-------
2.7% for respiratory-related mortality, per 10 (Jg/m3 increase in PM2.5 (U.S. EPA, 2004,
056905).
In the current review, PM2.5 risk estimates were found to be consistently positive, and
slightly larger than those reported for PM10 for all-cause, and respiratory- and
cardiovascular-related mortality. The risk estimates for all-cause (non-accidental) mortality
ranged from 0.29% (Dominici et al., 2007, 099135) to 1.21% (Franklin et al., 2007, 091257)
per 10 |ug/m3 increase in PM2.5. These associations were consistently observed at lag 1 and
lag 0*1, which have been confirmed through extensive analyses in PMicrmortality studies.
Cardiovascular-related mortality risk estimates were found to be similar to those for
all-cause mortality! whereas, the risk estimates for respiratory-related mortality were
consistently larger: 1.01% (Franklin et al., 2007, 091257) to 2.2% (Ostro et al., 2006,
087991) using the same lag (i.e., lag 1 and lag 0-1) and averaging indices. Regional and
seasonal patterns in PM2.5 risk estimates were observed with results similar to those
presented for PM10 (Dominici et al., 2007, 099135; Peng et al., 2005, 087463; Zeka et al.,
2006, 088749), with the greatest effects occurring in the eastern U.S. (Franklin et al., 2007,
091257; Franklin et al., 2008, 097426) and during the spring (Franklin et al., 2007, 091257;
Zanobetti and Schwartz, 2009, 188462). Of the studies evaluated, no U.S.-based multi-city
studies conducted a detailed analysis of the potential confounding of PM2.5 risk estimates by
gaseous pollutants, but Burnett et al. (2004, 086247) found mixed results, with possible
confounding by NO2 when analyzing gaseous pollutants in a multi-city Canadian-based
study. However, it should be noted that U.S.-based multi-city studies that focused on the
association between PM10 and mortality found that gaseous pollutants are not likely to
confound the PM-mortality relationship. An examination of effect modifiers (e.g.,
demographic and socioeconomic factors), specifically air conditioning use which is
sometimes used as a surrogate for decreased pollutant penetration indoors, has suggested
that PM2.5 risk estimates increase as the percent of the population with access to air
conditioning decreases (Franklin et al., 2007, 091257; Franklin et al., 2008, 097426).
Collectively, the epidemiologic evidence on the effect of short-term exposure to PM2.5 on
mortality is sufficient to conclude that a causal relationship is likely to exist at ambient
concentrations.
July 2009
6-317
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
6.5.3.2. PMio-2.5
The 2004 PM AQCD (U.S. EPA, 2004, 056905) found a limited body of evidence that
was suggestive of associations between short-term exposure to ambient PM10-2.5 and various
mortality outcomes (e.g., 0.08 to 2.4% increase in total [non-accidental] mortality per
10 (Jg/m3 increase in PM10-2.5). As a result, the AQCD concluded that PM10-2.5, or some
constituent component(s) (including those on the surface) of PM10-2.5, may contribute, in
certain circumstances, to increased human health risks.
The majority of studies evaluated in this review that examined mortality associations
with PM10-2.5 reported mixed results in terms of the relative impact of PM10-2.5 on mortality.
These studies were conducted in areas with mean 24-h avg concentrations ranging from
6.1-16.4 (Jg/m3. This can primarily be attributed to the majority of studies being conducted
in individual cities and the cityto-city variation in the chemical composition of PM10-2.5. A
new study of 47 U.S. cities (Zanobetti and Schwartz, 2009, 188462), which estimated
PM10-2.5 by calculating the difference between the county-average PM10 and PM2.5, found
associations between PM10-2.5 and mortality across the U.S., including regions where
PM10-2.5 levels are not high. One well conducted multicity Canadian study (Burnett et al.,
2004, 086247) also provides evidence for an association between short-term exposure to
PM10-2.5 and mortality. However, unlike PM2.5 not many of the PM10-2.5 studies have
investigated confounding by gaseous copollutants or the influence of model specification on
PM10-2.5 risk estimates. Zanobetti and Schwartz (2009, 188462) did provide preliminary
evidence for greater effects during the warmer months (i.e., spring and summer), which is
consistent with the PMio-mortality studies (Peng et al., 2005, 087463; Zeka et al., 2006,
088749). Overall, although more data is needed to adequately characterize the chemical
and biological components that may modify the potential toxicity of PM10-2.5, consistent
positive associations between short-term exposure to PM10-2.5 and mortality were observed
in the U.S. and Canadian-based multicity studies, as well as in single-city studies
conducted in these locations. Therefore, the epidemiologic evidence on the effect of
short-term exposure to PM10 2.5 on mortality is suggestive of a causal relationship at ambient
concentrations.
July 2009
6-318
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
6.5.3.3. Ultrafine PM
Limited evidence was available during the review of the 2004 PM AQCD (U.S. EPA,
2004, 056905) regarding the potential association between UFP and mortality. The lone
study evaluated was conducted in Germany and provided some evidence for an association,
but this association was reduced upon the inclusion of gaseous copollutants in a two-
pollutant model.
Only a few new studies, all of them from Europe, were identified during this review,
which examined the association between short-term exposure to UFP and mortality.
Inconsistencies were observed in the lag structure of association reported by each study in
terms of both the lag day with the greatest association and the number of lag days
considered in the study. Overall the studies consistently found that UFP were correlated
with gaseous pollutants derived from local combustion sources and that one or more of the
gaseous pollutants were also associated with mortality. The limited number of studies
available and the discrepancy in results between studies further confirms the need for
additional data to examine the UFP-mortality relationship. In conclusion, the epidemiologic
evidence on the effect of short-term exposure to UFP on mortality is inadequate to infer a
causal association at ambient concentrations.
6.6. Attribution of Ambient PM Health Effects to Specific
Constituents or Sources
From a mechanistic perspective, it is highly plausible that the chemical composition of
PM would be a better predictor of health effects than particle size. This would be consistent
with observed regional heterogeneity in PM-related health effects in some epidemiologic
studies. Also, data from the CSN demonstrate gradients in a number of PM2.5 components,
including EC, OC, nitrate, and S042~ (Section 3.5.1.1). Recent studies in epidemiology,
controlled human exposure, and toxicology have begun using apportionment of ambient PM
into chemical constituents and sources, in an attempt to link them to health outcomes and
endpoints, and thus examine their possible role in health effects.
This section focuses on studies that have assessed effects for a range of PM sources or
components. Some of the studies reviewed earlier in this chapter evaluated the relationship
between specific chemical constituents derived from ambient PM and health effects,
including mortality and cardiovascular and respiratory morbidity. However, many of these
July 2009
6-319
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
studies, as well as others only included in the Annexes, only considered one or a small
number of PM constituents. Controlled human exposure and toxicological studies that use a
single compound found in PM rather than ambient PM are also included in this category.
Additionally, studies that presented ambient PM composition and health data without
systematically and explicitly investigating relationships are also excluded from this section.
In contrast, other epidemiologic, controlled human exposure, and toxicological studies took
into consideration a large set of PM constituents (typically minerals, metals, EC, OC, and
ions such as SOr ), aiming to segregate which constituents or groups of constituents may
be responsible for the PM-related health effects observed. This section compiles these latter
studies and provides a review of their findings. The focus of this section is limited to those
studies that use ambient measurements of chemically speciated PM to examine
associations with health outcomes and endpoints. One of the most salient characteristics of
ambient PM speciation data is the large number of constituents that compose PM and the
strength of the correlation between each constituents.
Prior to the 2004 PM AQCD (U.S. EPA, 2004, 056905), only a handful of epidemiologic
studies had attempted to relate specific constituents or sources of ambient PM to health
outcomes without selecting constituents a priori. In this review, approximately 40 new
epidemiologic, controlled human exposure, and toxicological studies explore the health
effects attributed to chemical constituents and sources of ambient PM. The following
summary (Section 6.6.3) provides a synthesis of the findings, including discussions on the
robustness, coherence, and consistency of the results.
6.6.1. Evaluation Approach
Relating a large number of ambient PM constituents with a large number of health
outcomes presents difficulties that are related to both the nature of PM, and the methods of
quantitative analysis. First, the number of constituents that comprise PM is not only large,
but the correlations between them are inherently high. Reducing the correlation between
constituents has been accomplished in most of the recent studies through various forms of
factor analysis, which limits the correlations between constituents by grouping the most
highly correlated ambient PM constituents into less correlated groups or factors. Some
studies identify the resulting groups or factors with named sources of ambient PM, but
many do not draw explicit links between factors and actual sources. The methods for
estimating source contributions to ambient PM are reviewed in Section 3.5.4.
July 2009
6-320
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Most studies, regardless of discipline, were based on data for between 7 and 20
ambient PM constituents, with EC, OC, SO4, and NO3 most commonly measured. Most, but
not all of the studies, reduced the number of ambient PM constituents by grouping them
with various factorization or source apportionment techniques before using a separate
analysis to examine the relationship between the grouped PM constituents and various
health effects. However, not all studies labeled the constituent groupings according to their
presumed source. A few performed these steps simultaneously using Partial Least Squares
(PLS) procedures or Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). A small number of controlled
human exposure and toxicological studies did not apply any kind of grouping to the ambient
PM speciation data.
There are some differences in the type of PM constituent data used in epidemiologic,
controlled human exposure and toxicological studies. In epidemiologic studies, ambient PM
speciation data is obtained from atmospheric monitors! for controlled human exposure and
toxicological studies, the experimental exposure technique used determines the type of PM
data. Thus, all epidemiologic studies relied on monitor data, while all of the controlled
human exposure and the majority of the toxicological studies used CAPs. The remaining
toxicological studies used ambient PM samples collected on filters at various U.S. sites.
Further details on the studies included can be found in Appendix F.
Some important limitations in interpreting these studies together is that few, if any of
the results are easily comparable, due to: differences in the sets of ambient PM constituents
that make up each of the factors! the subjectivity involved in labeling factors as sources! the
numerous potential health effects examined in these studies, including definitive outcomes
(e.g., HAs) as well as physiological alterations (e.g., increased inflammatory response); and
the various statistical methods and analytical approaches used in the studies. There are no
well-established, objective methods for conducting the various forms of factor analysis and
source apportionment, leaving much of the model operation and factor assignment open to
judgment by the individual investigator. For example, the Al/Si factor identified in one
study may differ from the Al/Ca/Fe/Si factor from another study, and the "Resuspended
Soil" factor from a third study.
After factorization or apportionment of the ambient PM data, various methods were
used for analyzing the potential association between ambient PM constituents or sources
and health effects. Except for the studies that used PLS or SEM, controlled human
exposure and toxicological studies all used univariate mixed model regression for every
July 2009
6-321
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
identified PM factor or source. A number of toxicological studies followed the univariate
step with multivariate regression for all factors. Epidemiologic studies generally related
short-term exposure to sources with health outcomes through various forms of Poisson
regression; whereas, one long-term exposure study used time-to-event data analysis
(survival analysis) methodology.
6.6.2. Findings
The results that follow are organized by discipline, with epidemiologic studies
followed by controlled human exposure and toxicological studies. This section ends with a
summary table, Table 6-17. Table 6-17 is broken out by PM2.5 sources, and includes those
epidemiologic, controlled human exposure, and in vivo toxicological studies that either
grouped ambient PM2.5 constituents or used tracers for each source. The table does not
include all factors or sources examined in the studies listed: those factors or sources for
which no association with effects was found are excluded.
6.6.2.1. Epidemiologic Studies
Results from the 2004 PM AQCD
Three epidemiologic studies were evaluated in the 2004 PM AQCD (U.S. EPA, 2004,
056905) that examined the association between PM constituents or sources and specific
health effects. Of these studies, one study associated daily mortality with a mobile sources
PM factor in Knoxville, TN and St. Louis, MO and coal in Boston, MA; while the crustal
factor was not found to be significant for any of the six cities studied (Laden et al., 2000,
012102). Another study demonstrated an association between a regional SO42- factor and
total mortality at lag 0 in Phoenix and factors for regional SO42-, motor vehicles, and
vegetative burning with cardiovascular mortality at lags of 0, 1, and 3, respectively (Mar et
al., 2000, 001760; 2003, 042841). Negative associations were observed between total
mortality and regional SO42- at lag 3, along with local SO2 and soil factors (Mar et al., 2000,
001760: 2003, 042841). Finally, Tsai et al. (2000, 006251) identified significant associations
between PMis-derived industrial sources and total daily deaths in Newark and Camden,
NJ; SO r was also linked to cardiopulmonary deaths in both locations. Total mortality and
cardiopulmonary deaths were also significantly associated with PM from oil burning in
Camden (2000, 006251).
July 2009
6-322
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Comparative Analyses of Source Apportionment Methods
Hopke et al. (2006, 088390) conducted a comparative analysis of source
apportionment techniques used by investigators at multiple institutions, and subsequently
used in epidemiologic analyses (Ito et al., 2006, 088391; Mar et al., 2006, 086143). An
overarching conclusion of this set of analyses, reported in Thurston et al. (2005, 097949), is
that variation in the source apportionment methods was not a major source of uncertainty
in the epidemiologic effect estimates. In the primary analyses, mortality was associated
with secondary SOr in both Phoenix and Washington D.C., although lag times differed (0
and 3, respectively). The SO r effect was stronger for total mortality in Washington D.C.
and for cardiovascular mortality in Phoenix (Ito et al., 2006, 088391; Mar et al., 2006,
086143). In addition, Ito et al. (2006, 088391) found some evidence for associations with
primary coal and traffic with total mortality in Washington D.C. (Ito et al., 2006, 088391)
while copper smelter, traffic, and sea salt were associated with cardiovascular mortality in
Phoenix at various lag times (Mar et al., 2006, 086143). In contrast to Phoenix, sea salt and
traffic were not associated with mortality in Washington D.C. (Ito et al., 2006, 088391), but
in both locations no associations were observed between biomass/wood combustion and
mortality (Ito et al., 2006, 088391; Mar et al., 2006, 086143). In an additional study that
compared three source apportionment methods in Atlanta - PMF, modified CMB, and a
single-species tracer approach - found that the epidemiologic results were robust to the
analytic method used (Sarnat et al., 2008, 097972). There were consistent associations
between ED visits for cardiovascular diseases with PM2.5 from mobile sources (gasoline and
diesel) and biomass combustion (primarily prescribed forest burning and residential wood
combustion), whereas PM2.5 from secondary SO42- was associated with respiratory disease
ED visits (Sarnat et al., 2008, 097972). Sarnat et al. (2008, 097972) also found that the
primary power plant PM2.5 source identified by the CMB approach was negatively
associated with respiratory ED visits while no association was found for PM2.5 from soil and
secondary nitrates/ammonium nitrate. In these studies, effect estimates based on the
different source apportionment methods were generally in close agreement.
Source Apportionment Studies
A study that examined associations with mortality in Santiago, Chile identified a
motor vehicle source of PM2.5 as having the greatest association with total and cardiac
mortality at lag 1 (Cakmak et al., 2009, 191995). There was effect modification by age, with
July 2009
6-323
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
the total mortality relative risks associated with PM2.5 from motor vehicles being greatest
for those >85 yr. Soil and combustion sources were also associated with cardiac mortality
Risk estimates for respiratory mortality were the greatest for the motor vehicle source, with
combustion and soil source factors also demonstrating positive associations for lag 1
(Cakmak et al., 2009, 191995).
An epidemiologic study that evaluated respiratory ED visits was conducted in
Spokane, WA and used tracers as indicators of ambient PM2.5 sources (Schreuder et al.,
2006, 097959). In this study, only PM2.5 from vegetative burning (total carbon) was
associated with increased respiratory ED visits for lag 1, while PM2.5 indicators for motor
vehicles (Zn) and soil (Si) were not associated with cardiac hospital or respiratory ED visits.
Andersen et al. (2007, 093201) conducted a source apportionment analysis to identify the
sources of ambient PM10 associated with cardiovascular and respiratory hospital
admissions in older adults and children (ages 5-18) in Copenhagen, including two-pollutant
models with various sources of PM10. Andersen et al. (2007, 093201 Hound that secondary
and crustal sources of PM10 were associated with cardiovascular hospital admissions!
biomass sources were associated with respiratory hospital admissions! and vehicle sources
were associated with asthma hospital admissions.
Several panel epidemiologic studies have examined the association between PM
sources and physiological alterations in cardiovascular function. Lanki et al. (2006, 089788)
reported associations between PM2.5 from local traffic and ST-segment depression in elderly
adults in a study conducted in Helsinki, Finland. In an additional study, Yue et al. (2007,
097968) found that adult males with coronary artery disease in Erfurt, Germany
demonstrated changes in repolarization parameters associated with traffic-related PM2.5,
with increased vWF linked to traffic and combustion-generated particles, although the
source apportionment analysis was based solely on particle size distribution. In addition,
elevated CRP levels were associated with all sources of PM2.5 (soil, local traffic, secondary
aerosols from local fuel combustion, diesel, and secondary aerosols from multiple sources)
(Yue et al., 2007, 097968). Reidiker et al. (2004, 056992), in a study of young highway patrol
officers, found that the most significant effects (HRV, supraventricular ectopic beats,
hematological markers, vWF) were associated with a "speed-change" factor for PM2.5 (2004,
056992). In addition, the authors observed an association between crustal factor and
cardiovascular effects, but no health-related associations with steel wear or gasoline PM2.5
source factors.
July 2009
6-324
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Two recent studies have examined the associations between ambient PM2.5 sources
and respiratory symptoms and lung function. Positive associations with PM2.5 motor vehicle
and road dust sources were reported for respiratory symptoms and inhaler use in asthmatic
children in New Haven, CT, and negative associations with wheeze or inhaler use for
biomass burning at lag 0-2 (Gent et al., 2009, 180399). These positive effects for motor
vehicle and road dust sources were robust to the inclusion of a gaseous copollutant (NO2,
CO, SO2, or O3) in the regression model. Penittinen et al. (2006, 087988) in a study
consisting of asthmatic adults living in Helsinki, Finland, found that decrements in PEF
were associated with ambient PM2.5 soil, long-range transport, and local combustion sources
at lags from 0-5 days. In addition, negative associations with asthma symptoms and
medication use were reported for PM2.5 from sea salt and long-range transport sources
(Penttinen et al., 2006, 087988).
PM Constituent Studies
Some studies considered large sets of ambient PM constituents and attempted to
identify which were associated with various health effects, but without grouping them into
factors, or identifying sources. The majority of these studies focused on health effects
associated with short-term exposure to PM2.5. Peng et al. (2009, 191998) examined the
association between PM2.5 constituents (i.e., EC, OC, SO42", NO3", Si, Na, NH4"1") and
cardiovascular and respiratory hospital admissions in 119 U.S. cities. When including each
constituent in a multipollutant model, Peng et al. (2009, 191998) found that EC and OC
were robust to the inclusion of the other constituents at lag 0 for cardiovascular and
respiratory hospital admissions, respectively. Although this study did not conduct analyses
to identify sources of the constituents examined, EC and OC are often attributed to motor
vehicle emissions, particularly diesel engines, and wood burning (Peng et al., 2009, 191998).
Ostro et al. (2007, 091354; 2008, 097971) conducted two studies in six California counties to
examine the association between ambient PM constituents and mortality. In the 2007
analysis, Ostro et al. (2006, 087991) found associations for Cu and all-cause mortality! EC,
K, and Zn and CVD mortality! and Cu and Ti and respiratory mortality at lags ranging
from 0 to 3 days. Associations during the summer were only observed for K for both CVD
and respiratory mortality! and Al, CI, Cu, Pb, Ti, and Zn for respiratory mortality. Overall,
the most consistent associations were observed during the cool season. In a subsequent
analysis, Ostro et al. (2008, 097971) examined the association between ambient PM
July 2009
6-325
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
constituents and cardiovascular mortality in potentially susceptible subpopulations. The
authors found positive associations between EC, OC, NO3", SO42", K, Cu, Fe, and Zn and
cardiovascular mortality These associations were higher in individuals with lower
educational attainment and of Hispanic ethnicity In addition, similar to the 2007 analysis,
associations were observed at lags ranging from 0 to 3 days.
One study long-term exposure to PM2.5 has included evaluation of multiple PM2.5
components and an indicator of traffic density (Lipfert et al., 2006, 088756). Using health
data from a cohort of U.S. military veterans and PM2.5 data from EPA's CSN, Lipfert et al.
(2006, 088756) reported a positive association for mortality with sulfates. Positive
associations were found between mortality and long-term exposures to nitrates, EC, Ni and
V, as well as traffic density and peak O3 concentrations. In multipollutant models,
associations with traffic density remained significant, as did nitrates, Ni and V in some
models.
Evaluation of Effect Modification by PM Constituents
Several studies have conducted secondary analyses to examine the whether variation
in associations between PM2.5 and morbidity or PM10 and mortality reflects differences in
PM2.5 constituents. An assumption in these types of analyses, especially when examining
the effects on PMio-mortality risk estimates, is that the relative contributions of PM2.5 have
remained the same over time, since these studies used PM10 data for years prior to 2000,
while PM2.5 speciation data has only been routinely collected since about 2000. Bell et al.
(2009, 191997) found statistically significant associations between the county average
concentrations of V, Ni, and EC (106 counties) and effect estimates for both cardiovascular
and respiratory hospital admissions with short-term exposure to PM2.5. In this analysis the
authors only focused on those ambient PM2.5 constituents (i.e., NH4"1", EC, OC, NO3", and
SO42") that comprised the majority of PM2.5 total mass in the study locations. Bell et al.
(2009, 191997) also conducted a similar analysis for PMio-mortality risk estimates and
found that only Ni increased the risk estimate. However, in a sensitivity analysis, when
selectively dropping out the communities examined one-by-one, the Ni association was
diminished when removing New York City. Both Lippmann et al. (2006, 091165) and
Dominici et al. (2007, 099135) conducted similar analyses, albeit using a smaller subset of
cities and/or different years of PM10 data. In both studies, Ni and V were found to modify
the PMio-mortality risk estimates. In addition, Dominici et al. (2007, 099135) also found in
July 2009
6-326
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
a sensitivity analysis that the association with Ni and V was diminished when excluding
New York City from the analysis.
6.6.2.2. Controlled Human Exposure Studies
A few controlled human exposure studies employed PCA, although not all linked
groupings of PM constituents to the measured physiological parameters. Huang et al.
(2003, 087377) demonstrated associations between increased fibrinogen and Cu/Zn/V and
increased BALF neutrophils and Fe/Se/SCk in young, healthy adults exposed to RTP, NC
CAPs! however, only water-soluble constituents were analyzed. In the other study that
examined physiological cardiovascular effects, Fe and EC were associated with changes in
ST-segment, while SO r was associated with decreased SBP in asthmatic and healthy
human volunteers exposed to Los Angeles CAPs (2003, 087377). In Gong et al. (2003,
087365) the majority of the PM was in the thoracic coarse fraction. In the other study that
used Los Angeles CAPs, the only observed association was between SO42- content and
decreased lung function (FEVi and FVC) in elderly volunteers with and without COPD
(Gong et al., 2005, 087921). Two additional controlled human exposure studies that did not
perform grouping and employed Toronto CAPs plus O3 demonstrated increased DBP and
increased brachial artery vasoconstriction associated with carbon content (2004, 055629;
Urch et al., 2005, 081080).
6.6.2.3. Toxicological Studies
The only toxicological in vivo study that characterized PM sources corresponding to
identified sources was conducted in Tuxedo, NY, over a 5-month period. This study reported
that all sources (regional SO42~, resuspended soil, residual oil, traffic and other unknown
sources) were linked to HR or HRV changes in mice at one time or another during or after
daily exposure (Lippmann et al., 2005, 087453). In a similar in vitro study using CAPs from
the same location, NF-kB in BEAS-2B cells were correlated with the oil combustion factor (r
= 0.289 and 0.302 for V and Ni, respectively) (Maciejczyk and Chen, 2005, 087456). The
other in vitro toxicological study (Duvall et al., 2008, 097969) that named sources employed
samples from five U.S. cities and found a good fit for the regression model with increased
IL-8 release in primary human airway epithelium cells and coal combustion (R2 = 0.79),
secondary nitrate (R2 = 0.63), and mobile sources (R2 = 0.39). In addition, soil (R2 = 0.48),
residual oil combustion (R2 = 0.38), and wood combustion (R2 = 0.33) were associated with
July 2009
6-327
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
COX-2 effects! whereas, secondary SC>42~ (R2 = 0.51) was correlated with HOI. Wood
combustion and soil were negatively associated with HOI.
Several toxicological studies employed Boston CAPs and identified at least four
groupings of ambient PM2.5 constituents (V/Ni, S, Al/Si, and Br/Pb), but they named sources
only partially and tentatively (Batalha et al., 2002, 088109; Clarke et al., 2000, 011806;
Godleski et al., 2002, 156478; Nikolov et al., 2008, 156808; Saldiva et al., 2002, 025988;
Wellenius et al., 2003, 055691). When examining cardiovascular effects these studies
reported that Si was associated with changes in the ST-segment of dogs (Wellenius et al.,
2003, 055691) and decreased LAV ratio in rat pulmonary arteries (Batalha et al., 2002,
088109) in multivariate analyses. In addition, blood hematological results were associated
with V/Ni, Al/Si, Na/Cl, and S in dogs (Clarke et al., 2000, 011806). An examination of
respiratory effects in the latter study found that V/Ni and Br/Pb were associated with
increased inflammation in BALF for only the 3rd day of exposure (Clarke et al., 2000,
011806). Decreased respiratory rate and increased airway irritation (Penh) in dogs were
associated with road dust (Al) and motor vehicles (OC), respectively (Nikolov et al., 2008,
156808). Individual PM2.5 constituents associated with elevated neutrophils in BALF were
Br, EC, OC, Pb, and SC>42~ (Godleski et al., 2002, 156478), which is consistent with the
findings (Br, EC, OC, Pb, V, and CI) of Saldiva et al. (2002, 025988).
The toxicological studies that used PLS methodologies identified PM2.5 constituents
linked to respiratory parameters. Seagrave et al. (2006, 091291) demonstrated associations
between cytotoxic responses and a gasoline plus nitrates source factor (OC, Pb,
hopanes/steranes, nitrate, and As) along with inflammatory responses and a gasoline plus
diesel source factor (including major metal oxides) in rats exposed IT. In the other study,
Veranth et al. (2006, 087479) collected loose surface soil from 28 sites in the Western U.S.
and exposed BEAS-2B cells to PM2.5. In the multivariate redundancy analysis, OCi, OC3,
OC2, EC2, Br, ECi, and Ni correlated with IL-8 release, decreased IL-6 release, and
decreased viability at low and high doses (10 and 80 |Jg/cm2, respectively).
July 2009
6-328
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table 6-17. Study-specific PM2.5 factor/source categories associated with health effects.
Typ
Source Category
Location
Health Effects
Time
eol
Stu
dy1
Species
Reference
CRUSTAL/SOIL/ROAD DUST
Al, Si, Fe
Phoenix, AZ
negative association with
total mortality
Lag 2
E
Human
Maretal. (2000,001760)
Not provided
Washington, D.C.
fCV mortality
Lag 4
E
Human
ltoetal.(2006, 088391)
Al, Ca, Fe, Si
Santiago, Chile
fCV mortality
f respiratory mortality
Lag 1
E
Human
Cakmak et al. (2009,191995)
Al, Si, Ca, K, Fe
Helsinki, Finland
ST-segment depression
Lag 3
E
Human
Lanki et al. (2006, 089788)
Al, Si, Ca, K, Fe
Los Angeles, CA
I ST-segment voltage
2 days post-exposure
H
Human
Gong et al. (2003, 042106)
Al, Si
Boston, MA
ST-segment change
Following exposure
T
Dog
Wellenius et al. (2003,055691)
Al, Si, Ca
Boston, MA
I lumen/wall ratio
24 h post-exposure
T
Rat
Batalha et al. (2002, 088109)
Al, Si, Ti, Fe
Wake County, NC
T uric acid
T mean cycle length
Lag 15 h
E
Human
Riediker et al. (2004, 056992)
Al, Si, Ca, Fe
Tuxedo, NY
4 HR
t HR
t SDNN, t RMSSD
During exposure
Afternoon post-exposur
e. Night post-exposure
T
Mouse
Lippmann et al. (2005, 087453)
Al, Si
Boston, MA
t blood PMN %
I blood lymphocytes %
t WBC
Following exposure
T
Dog
Clarke et al.(2000, 011806)
Si, Fe, A I, Ca, Ba, Ti
New Haven, CT
T respiratory symptoms and
inhaler use
Lag 0-2
E
Human
Gent et al. (2009,180399)
Si, Al, Ca, Fe, Mn
Helsinki, Finland
I mean PEF
Lag 3
E
Human
Penttinen et al. (2006, 087988)
Al
Boston, MA
I airway irritation (penh)
During exposure
T
Dog
Nikolovet al. (2008,156808)
SALT
Not provided
Phoenix, AZ
fCV mortality
ftotal mortality
negative association with
total mortality
Lag 5
LagO
E
Human
Maretal. (2006,086143)
Na, CI
Helsinki, Finland
ST-segment depression
Lag 3
E
Human
Lanki et al. (2006, 089788)
Na, CI
Boston, MA
f blood lymphocyte %
Following exposure
T
Dog
Clarke et al.(2000, 011806)
Na, CI
Helsinki, Finland
Negatively associated with
bronchodilator use and
corticosteroid use
Lag 0-5 avg
E
Human
Penttinen et al. (2006, 087988)
Na, CI
Boston, MA
f lung PMN density
24 h post-exposure
T
Rat
Saldiva et al. (2002, 025988)
SECONDARY SO/ /
LONG RANGE TRANSPORT
S
Phoenix, AZ
f total mortality
negative association with
total mortality
LagO
Lag 5
E
Human
Maretal. (2000,001760)
Not provided
Washington, D.C.
f total mortality
Lag 3
E
Human
Itoetal. (2006, 088391)
Not provided
Phoenix, AZ
fCV mortality
Lag 0
E
Human
Maretal. (2006, 086143)
S, K, Zn, Pb
Helsinki, Finland
ST-segment depression
Lag 2
E
Human
Lanki et al. (2006, 089788)
July 2009
6-329
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Typ
Source Category
Location
Health Effects
Time
eof
Stu
dy1
Species
Reference
SO42-
Los Angeles, CA
4 SBP
4 h post exposure
H
Human
Gongetal. (2003, 042106)
S, Si, oc
Tuxedo, NY
4 HR
| SDNN, | RMSSD
Afternoon post-
exposure
Night post-exposure
T
Mouse
Lippmann et al. (2005, 087453)
s
Boston, MA
| RBC
| hemoglobin
Following exposure
T
Dog
Clarke et al. (2000,011806)
SO42-, NH4+, oc
Atlanta, GA
f respiratory ED visits
Lag 0
E
Human
Sarnat et al. (2008, 097972)
S, K, Zn, PM mass
Helsinki, Finland
J, mean PEF. Negative
association with asthma
symptom prevalence
Lag 1
Lag 3
E
Human
Penttinen et al. (2006, 087988)
SO42 (+NO2)
Los Angeles, CA
| FEVi
| FVC
Following exposure
H
Human
Gongetal. (2005, 087921)
TRAFFIC
Pb, Br, Cu
Harvard Six Cities
f total mortality
Lag 0-1
E
Human
Laden et al. (2000,012102)
Not provided
Phoenix, AZ
fCV mortality
Lag 1
E
Human
Maretal. (2006, 086143)
Mn, Fe, Zn, Pb, OC, EC,
CO.NO?
Phoenix, AZ
f CV mortality
Lag 1
E
Human
Maret al. (2000, 001760)
CO, NO?, EC, OC
Santiago, Chile
fCV mortality
f respiratory mortality
Lag 1
E
Human
Cakmak et al. (2009,191995)
Gasoline (OC, NO3', NH4+)
Atlanta, GA
t CVD ED visits
Lag 0
E
Human
Sarnat et al. (2008, 097972)
Diesel (EC, OC, NO3)
Atlanta, GA
t CVD ED visits
Lag 0
E
Human
Sarnat et al. (2008, 097972)
NOx, EC, ultrafine count
Helsinki, Finland
ST-segment depression
Lag 2
E
Human
Lanki et al. (2006, 089788)
Speed-change factor (Cu,
S, aldehydes)
Wake County, NC
f blood urea nitrogen
f mean red cell volume
t blood PMN %
J, blood lymphocytes %
f von Willebrand factor
(vWF)
4 protein C
f mean cycle length
t SDNN
t PNN50
| supraventricular ectopic
beats
Lag 15 h
E
Human
Riediker et al. (2004, 056992)
Motor vehicle/other (Br,
Pb, Se, Zn, N03-)
Tuxedo, NY
4 RMSSD
Afternoon post-
exposure
T
Mouse
Lippmann et al. (2005, 087453)
EC, Zn, Pb, Cu, Se
New Haven, CT
f respiratory symptoms
Lag 0-2
E
Human
Gent et al. (2009,180399)
Local combustion (NOx,
ultrafine PM, Cu, Zn, Mn,
Fe)
Helsinki, Finland
4 mean PEF
Lag 0-5 avg
E
Human
Penttinen et al. (2006, 087988)
Gasoline+secondary
nitrate*
Birmingham, AL;
Atlanta, GA;
Pensacola, FL;
Centreville, AL
cytotoxic responses
(potency)
24 h post-exposure
T
Rat
Seagrave et al. (2006, 091291)
Gasoline-t-diesel*
Birmingham, AL;
Atlanta, GA;
Pensacola, FL;
Centreville, AL
inflammatory responses
(potency)
24 h post-exposure
T
Rat
Seagrave et al. (2006, 091291)
July 2009
6-330
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Typ
Source Category
Location
Health Effects
Time
eof
Stu
dy1
Species
Reference
OIL COMBUSTION
V, Ni
Boston, MA
t blood PMN %
J, blood lymphocytes %
f BALF AM %
Following exposure
Following exposure
24 h post exposure
T
Dog
Clarke et al. (2000,011806)
V, Ni, Se
Tuxedo, NY
4 SDNN
4 RMSSD
Afternoon post-
exposure
T
Mouse
Lippmann et al. (2005, 087453)
Ni
Boston, MA
J, respiratory rate
During exposure
T
Dog
Nikolov et al. (2008,156808)
V, Ni
Boston, MA
f lung PMN density
24 h post-exposure
T
Rat
Saldiva et al. (2002, 025988)
COAL COMBUSTION
Se, S042-
Harvard Six Cities
f total mortality
Lag 0-1
E
Human
Laden et al. (2000,012102)
Not provided
Washington, D.C.
f total mortality
Lag 3
E
Human
Itoetal. (2006, 088391)
OTHER METALS
Cu smelter (not provided)
Phoenix, AZ
fCV mortality
ftotal mortality
LagO
E
Human
Maretal. (2006,086143)
Incinerator
Washington, D.C.
Negative association with
total and CV mortality
LagO
E
Human
Itoetal. (2006,088391)
Metal processing (SO42~,
Fe, NH4+, EC, 0C)
Atlanta, GA
t CVD ED visits
Lag 0
E
Human
Sarnat et al. (2008, 097972)
Combustion (Cr, Cu, Fe,
Mn, Zn)
Santiago, Chile
fCV mortality
f respiratory mortality
Lag 1
E
Human
Cakmak et al. (2009,191995)
WOODSMOKE/
VEGETATIVE BURNING
0C, K
Phoenix, AZ
f CV mortality
Lag 3
E
Human
Maret al. (2000, 001760)
0C,EC,K,NH4+
Atlanta, GA
t CVD ED visits
Lag 0
E
Human
Sarnat et al. (2008, 097972)
Total C
Spokane, WA
f respiratory ED visits
Lag 1
E
Human
Schreuderet al. (2006, 097959)
UNNAMED FACTORS
Zn-Cu-V
Chapel Hill, NC
f blood fibrinogen
18 h post-exposure
H
Human
Huang et al. (2003, 087377)
Fe-Se-S042-
Chapel Hill, NC
t BALF PMN
18 h post-exposure
H
Human
Huang et al. (2003, 087377)
Br, CI, Pb
Santiago, Chile
fCV mortality
f respiratory mortality
Lag 1
E
Human
Cakmak et al. (2009,191995)
Br, Pb
Boston, MA
t BALF PMN %
24 h post-exposure
T
Dog
Clarke et al.(2000, 011806)
Br, Pb
Boston, MA
f lung PMN density
24 h post-exposure
T
Rat
Saldiva et al. (2002, 025988)
"Constituents not provided.
1 E = Epidemiologic study; h = Controlled human exposure study; T = Toxicological study
An in vitro toxicological study that employed Chapel Hill PMio used PCAbut did not
name specific PM sources (Becker et al., 2005, 088590). In this study, the release of IL-6
from human alveolar macrophages and 11/8 from normal human bronchial epithelial cells
was associated with a PMio factor comprised of Cr, Al, Si, Ti, Fe, and Cu. No statistically
significant effects were observed for a second PMio factor (Zn, As, V, Ni, Pb, and Se).
July 2009
6-331
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Those toxicological studies that did not apply groupings to the ambient PM2.5
speciation data demonstrated a variety of results. Two Boston CAPs studies demonstrated
lung oxidative stress correlated with a number of individual PM2.5 constituents including,
Mn, Zn, Fe, Cu, and Ca (Gurgueira et al., 2002, 036535) (Gurgueira et al., 2002, 036535)
and Al, Si, Fe, K, Pb, and Cu (Rhoden et al., 2004, 087969) in rats using univariate
regression. The remaining toxicological study that did not use ambient PM constituent
groupings reported a correlation between Zn and plasma fibrinogen in SH rats when
constituents were normalized per unit mass of CAPs (Kodavanti et al., 2002, 035344).
6.6.3. Summary by Health Effects
Recent epidemiologic, toxicological, and controlled human exposure studies have
evaluated the health effects associated with ambient PM constituents and sources, using a
variety of quantitative methods applied to a broad set of PM constituents, rather than
selecting a few constituents a priori. As shown in Table 6-17, numerous ambient PM2.5
source categories have been associated with health effects, including factors for PM from
crustal and soil, traffic, secondary SO42-, power plants, and oil combustion sources. There is
some evidence for trends and patterns that link particular ambient PM constituents or
sources with specific health outcomes, but there is insufficient evidence to determine
whether these patterns are consistent or robust.
For cardiovascular effects, multiple outcomes have been linked to a PM
crustal/soil/road dust source, including cardiovascular mortality in Washington D.C. (Ito et
al., 2006, 08839 Dand Santiago, Chile (Cakmak et al., 2009, 191995) and ST-segment
changes in Helsinki (Lanki et al., 2006, 089788), Los Angeles (Gong et al., 2003, 042106),
and Boston (Wellenius et al., 2003, 055691). Interestingly, the ST-segment changes have
been observed in an epidemiologic panel study, a controlled human exposure study, and a
toxicological study, although the majority of the CAPs in the controlled human exposure
study was PM10-2.5. Further support for a crustal/soil/road dust source associated with
cardiovascular health effects comes from a PM10 source apportionment study in
Copenhagen that reported increased cardiovascular hospital admissions (Andersen et al.,
2007, 093201).
PM2.5 traffic and WS/vegetative burning sources have also been linked to
cardiovascular effects. Cardiovascular mortality in Phoenix (Mar et al., 2000, 001760; Mar
et al., 2006, 086143) and Santiago, Chile (Cakmak et al., 2009, 191995) was associated with
July 2009
6-332
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
traffic at lag 1. Gasoline and diesel sources were associated with ED visits in Atlanta for
cardiovascular disease at lag 0 (Sarnat et al., 2008, 097972). Cardiovascular mortality in
Phoenix (Mar et al., 2000, 001760) and ED visits in Atlanta (Sarnat et al., 2008, 097972)
were associated with WS/vegetative burning.
Studies that only examined the effects of individual PM2.5 constituents linked EC to
cardiovascular hospital admissions in a multicity analysis (Peng et al., 2009, 191998) and
cardiovascular mortality in California (Ostro et al., 2007, 091354; 2008, 097971).
These studies suggest that cardiovascular effects maybe associated with PIVL n from
motor vehicle emissions, wood or biomass burning, and PM (both PM2.5 and PM10-2.5) from
crustal or road dust sources. In addition, there are many studies that observed associations
between other sources (i.e., salt, secondary S042~/long-range transport, other metals) and
cardiovascular effects, but at this time, there does not appear to be a consistent trend or
pattern of effects for those factors.
There is less consistency in observed associations between PM sources and
respiratory health effects, which may be partially due to the fact that fewer studies have
been conducted that evaluated respiratory-related outcomes and measures. However, there
is some evidence for associations with secondary SC>42~ PM2.5. Sarnat et al. (2008, 097972)
found an increase in respiratory ED visits in Atlanta that was associated with a PM2.5
secondary SC>42~ factor. Decrements in lung function in Helsinki (Lanki et al., 2006, 089788)
and Los Angeles (Gong et al., 2005, 087921) in asthmatic and healthy adults, respectively,
were also linked to this factor. Health effects relating to the crustal/soil/road dust and
traffic sources of PM included increased respiratory symptoms in asthmatic children (Gent
et al., 2009, 180399) and decreased PEF in asthmatic adults (Penttinen et al., 2006,
087988). Inconsistent results were also observed in those PM2.5 studies that use individual
constituents to examine associations with respiratory morbidity and mortality, although
Cu, Pb, OC, and Zn were related to respiratory health effects in two or more studies.
A few studies have identified PM2.5 sources associated with total mortality. These
studies found an association between mortality and a PM2.5 coal combustion factor (Laden
et al., 2000, 012102). while others linked mortality to a secondary SO r /long-range
transport PM2.5 source (Ito et al., 2006, 088391; Mar et al., 2006, 086143). One long-term
exposure study reported an association between EC in PM2.5 and total mortality, and some
evidence for associations with Ni and V, in a cohort of U.S. veterans (Lipfert et al., 2006,
088756).
July 2009
6-333
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Recent studies have evaluated whether epidemiologic effect estimates from multicity
studies were related to the specific PM2.5 constituents in the cities (Bell et al., 2009, 191997;
Dominici et al., 2007, 099135; Lippmann et al., 2006, 091165). In all three studies, PMicr
mortality effect estimates were greater in areas with higher proportion of Ni in PM2.5, but
when New York City was excluded in a sensitivity analysis in two of the studies, the
association was diminished. A relationship was also found between V concentration in PM2.5
for PMicrmortality effect estimates as well as those for PM2.5 with respiratory and
cardiovascular hospital admissions (Bell et al., 2009, 191997).
Recent studies show that source apportionment methods have the potential to add
useful insights into which sources and/or PM constituents may contribute to different
health effects. Of particular interest are several epidemiologic studies that compared source
apportionment methods and the associated results. One set of studies compared
epidemiologic associations with PM2.5 source factors using several methods - PCA, PMF,
and UNMIX - independently analyzed by separate research groups (Hopke et al., 2006,
088390; Ito et al., 2006, 088391; Mar et al., 2006, 086143; Thurston et al., 2005, 097949).
Schreuder et al. (2006, 097959) compared UPM and two versions of UNMIX to derive
tracers and Sarnat et al. (2008, 097972) compared PMF, modified CMB, and a single-species
tracer approach. In all analyses, epidemiologic results based on the different methods were
generally in close agreement. The variation in risk estimates for daily mortality between
source categories was significantly larger than the variation between research groups (Ito
et al., 2006, 088391; Mar et al., 2006, 086143; Thurston et al., 2005, 097949). Additionally,
the variation in risk estimates based on the source apportionment model used had a much
smaller effect than the variation caused by the different source constituents. Further, the
most strongly associated source types were consistent across all groups. This supports the
general validity of such approaches, though integration of results would be simpler if the
methods employed for grouping PM constituents were more consistent across studies and
disciplines. Further research would aid understanding of the contribution of different
factors, sources, or source tracers of PM to health effects by increasing the number of
locations where similar health endpoints or outcomes are examined.
In summary, these findings are consistent with the conclusions of the 2004 PM AQCD
(U.S. EPA, 2004, 056905), that a number of source types, including motor vehicle emissions,
coal combustion, oil burning, and vegetative burning, are associated with health effects
(U.S. EPA, 2004, 056905). Although the crustal factor of fine particles was not associated
July 2009
6-334
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
with mortality in the 2004 PM AQCD (U.S. EPA, 2004, 056905), recent studies have
suggested that PM (both PM2.5 and PM10-2.5) from crustal, soil or road dust sources or PM
tracers linked to these sources are associated with cardiovascular effects. In addition,
secondary SC>42~ PM2.5 has been associated with both cardiovascular and respiratory effects.
Overall, the results displayed in Table 6-17 indicate that many constituents of PM can be
linked with differing health effects and the evidence is not yet sufficient to allow
differentiation of those constituents or sources that are more closely related to specific
health outcomes.
July 2009
6-335
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Chapter 6 References
Adamkiewicz Gi Ebelt Si Syring Mi Slater Ji Speizer FEi Schwartz Ji Suh Hi Gold DR. (2004). Association
between air pollution exposure and exhaled nitric oxide in an elderly population. Thorax, 59- 204-209.
087925
Adar SDi Adamkiewicz Gi Gold DRi Schwartz Ji Coull BAi Suh H. (2007). Ambient and microenvironmental
particles and exhaled nitric oxide before and after a group bus trip. Environ Health Perspect, 115- 507"
12.098635
Adar SDi Gold DRi Coull BAi Schwartz Ji Stone PHi Suh H. (2007). Focused exposures to airborne traffic
particles and heart rate variability in the elderly. Epidemiology, 18- 95-103. 001458
Aekplakorn Wi Loomis Di Vichit-Vadakan Ni Shy Ci Plungchuchon S. (2003). Acute effects of S02 and particles
from a power plant on respiratory symptoms of children, Thailand. , 34- 906-914. 089908
Alarie Y. (1973). Sensory irritation by airborne chemicals. , 2- 299-363. 191136
Albert CMi Rosenthal Li Calkins Hi Steinberg JSi Ruskin JNi Wang Pi Muller JEi Mittleman MA. (2007).
Driving and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Shocks for Ventricular Arrhythmias' Results From
the TOVA Study. J Am Coll Cardiol, 50: 2233-2240. 156201
Alexis NEi Lay JCi Zeman Ki Bennett WEi Peden DBi Soukup JMi Devlin RBi Becker S. (2006). Biological
material on inhaled coarse fraction particulate matter activates airway phagocytes in vivo in healthy
volunteers. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 117: 1396-1403. 154323
Allen RWi Mar Ti Koenig J; Liu LJi Gould Ti Simpson Ci Larson T. (2008). Changes in lung function and airway
inflammation among asthmatic children residing in a woodsmoke-impacted urban area. Inhal Toxicol, 20:
423-433. 156208
Analitis Ai Katsouyanni Ki Dimakopoulou Ki Samoli Ei Nikoloulopoulos AKi Petasakis Yi Touloumi Gi
Schwartz Ji Anderson HRi Cambra Ki Forastiere Fi Zmirou Di Vonk JMi Clancy Li Kriz Bi Bobvos Ji
Pekkanen J. (2006). Short-term effects of ambient particles on cardiovascular and respiratory mortality. ,
17: 230-233. 088177
Andersen ZJi Wahlin Pi Raaschou-Nielsen Oi Ketzel Mi Scheike Ti Loft S. (2008). Size distribution and total
number concentration of ultrafine and accumulation mode particles and hospital admissions in children
and the elderly in Copenhagen, Denmark. , 65: 458-66. 189651
Andersen ZJi Wahlin Pi Raaschou-Nielsen Oi Scheike Ti Loft S. (2007). Ambient particle source apportionment
and daily hospital admissions among children and elderly in Copenhagen. 625-636. 093201
Anderson HRi Bremner SAi Atkinson RWi Harrison RMi Walters S. (2001). Particulate matter and daily
mortality and hospital admissions in the west midlands conurbation of the United Kingdom: associations
with fine and coarse particles, black smoke and sulphate. Occup Environ Med, 58: 504-510. 017033
Anderson MEi Bogdan GM. (2007). Environments, indoor air quality, and children. Pediatr Clin North Am, 54:
295-307, viii. 156214
Anselme Fi Loriot Si Henry J-Pi Dionnet Fi Napoleoni J-Gi Thnillez Ci Morin J-P. (2007). Inhalation of diluted
diesel engine emission impacts heart rate variability and arrhythmia occurrence in a rat model of chronic
ischemic heart failure. Arch Toxicol, 81: 299-307. 097084
Antonini JMi Roberts JRi Jernigan MRi Yang H"Mi Ma JYCi Clarke RW. (2002). Residual oil fly ash increases
the susceptibility to infection and severely damages the lungs after pulmonary challenge with a bacterial
pathogen. Toxicol Sci, 70: 110-119. 035342
Antonini JMi Taylor MDi Leonard SSi Lawryk NJi Shi Xi Clarke RWi Roberts JR. (2004). Metal composition
and solubility determine lung toxicity induced by residual oil fly ash collected from different sites within
a power plant. Mol Cell Biochem, 255: 257-265. 097199
Arantes-Costa Fi Lopes Fi Toledo Ai Magliarelli-Filho Pi Moriya Hi Carvalho-Oliveira Ri Mauad Ti Saldiva Pi
Martins M. (2008). Effects of residual oil fly ash (ROFA) in mice with chronic allergic pulmonary
inflammation. Toxicol Pathol, 36: 680. 187137
Arbex MAi Martins LCi De Oliveira RCi Pereira LAi Arbex FFi Cancado JEi Saldiva PHi Braga AL. (2007). Air
pollution from biomass burning and asthma hospital admissions in a sugar cane plantation area in
Brazil. J Epidemiol Community Health, 61: 395-400. 091637
Note: Hyperlinks to the reference citations throughout this document will take you to the NCEA HERO database (Health
and Environmental Research Online) at http://epa.gov/hero. HERO is a database of scientific literature used by U.S. EPA in
the process of developing science assessments such as the Integrated Science Assessments (ISA) and the Integrated Risk
Information System (IRIS).
July 2009 6-336 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Arena VC; Mazumdar Si Zborowski JVi Talbott EOi He Si Chuang YHi Schwerha JJ. (2006). A retrospective
investigation of PM10 in ambient air and cardiopulmonary hospital admissions in Allegheny County,
Pennsylvania^ 1995-2000. J Occup Environ Med, 48: 38-47. 088631
Atiga WLi Calkins Hi Lawrence JHi Tomaselli GFi Smith JM; Berger RD. (1998). Beat-to-beat repolarization
lability identifies patients at risk for sudden cardiac death. , 9: 899-908. 156231
Atkinson RW; Anderson HR; Sunyer J; Ayres J; Baccini Mi Vonk JM; Boumghar Ai Forastiere Fi Forsberg Bi
Touloumi Gi Schwartz J; Katsouyanni K. (2001). Acute effects of particulate air pollution on respiratory
admissions^ results from APHEA 2 project. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 164: 1860-1866. 021959
Atkinson RW! Anderson HR; Sunyer J; Ayres J; Baccini M> Vonk JM; Boumghar A; Forastiere F> Forsberg Bi
Touloumi Gi Schwartz J; Katsouyanni K. (2003). Acute effects of particulate air pollution on respiratory
admissions. 042797
Atkinson RW; Bremner SA; Anderson HR; Strachan DP; Bland JM; Ponce de Leon A. (1999). Short-term
associations between emergency hospital admissions for respiratory and cardiovascular disease and
outdoor air pollution in London. Arch Environ Occup Health, 54: 398-411. 007882
Baccarelli A; Cassano P; Litonjua A; Park S; Suh H; Sparrow D; Vokonas P; Schwartz J. (2008). Cardiac
autonomic dysfunction: effects from particulate air pollution and protection by dietary methyl nutrients
and metabolic polymorphisms. , 117: 1802. 191959
Baccarelli A; Martinelli I; Zanobetti A; Grillo P; Hou LF; Bertazzi PA; Mannucci PM; Schwartz J. (2008).
Exposure to Particulate Air Pollution and Risk of Deep Vein Thrombosis. Arch Intern Med, 168: 920-927.
157984
Baccarelli A; Zanobetti A; Martinelli I; Grillo P; Hou L; Giacomini S; Bonzini M; Lanzani G; Mannucci PM;
Bertazzi PA; Schwartz J. (2007). Effects of exposure to air pollution on blood coagulation. J Thromb
Haemost, 5: 252-260. 090733
Baccarelli A; Zanobetti A; Martinelli I; Grillo P; Hou L; Lanzani G; Mannucci PM; Bertazzi PA; Schwartz J.
(2007). Air pollution, smoking, and plasma homocysteine. Environ Health Perspect, 115: 176-181. 091310
Bagate K; Meiring JJ; Gerlofs-Nijland ME; Vincent R; Cassee FR; Borm PJA. (2004). Vascular effects of
ambient particulate matter instillation in spontaneous hypertensive rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 197:
29-39. 087945
Ballester F; Rodriguez P; Iniguez C; Saez M; Daponte A; Galan I; Taracido M; Arribas F; Bellido J; Cirarda FB;
Canada A; Guillen JJ; Guillen-Grima F; Lopez E; Perez-Hoyos S; Lertxundi A; Toro S. (2006). Air
pollution and cardiovascular admisisons association in Spain: results within the EMECAS project. J
Epidemiol Community Health, 60: 328-336. 088746
Barclay JL; Miller BG; Dick S; Dennekamp M; Ford I; Hillis GS; Ayres JG; Seaton A. (2009). A panel study of
air pollution in subjects with heart failure: negative results in treated patients. Occup Environ Med, 66:
325-334. 179935
Barnett AG; Williams GM; Schwartz J; Best TL; Neller AH; Petroeschevsky AL; Simpson RW. (2006). The
effects of air pollution on hospitalizations for cardiovascular disease in elderly people in Australian and
New Zealand cities. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 1018-1023. 089770
Barnett AG; Williams GM; Schwartz J; Neller AH; Best TL; Petroeschevsky AL; Simpson RW. (2005). Air
pollution and child respiratory health: a case-crossover study in Australia and New Zealand. Am J Respir
Crit Care Med, 171: 1272-1278. 087394
Barraza-Villarreal A; Sunyer J; Hernandez-Cadena L; Escamilla-Nunez MC; Sienra-Monge JJ; Ramirez-Aguilar
M; Cortez-Lugo M; Holguin F; Diaz-Sanchez D; Olin AC; Romieu I. (2008). Air pollution, airway
inflammation, and lung function in a cohort study of Mexico City schoolchildren. Environ Health
Perspect, 116: 832-838. 156254
BarregardL; Sallsten G; Andersson L; Almstrand AC; Gustafson P; Andersson M; Olin AC. (2008).
Experimental exposure to wood smoke: effects on airway inflammation and oxidative stress. Occup
Environ Med, 65: 319-324. 155675
Barregard L; Sallsten G; Gustafson P; Andersson L; Johansson L; Basu S; Stigendal L. (2006). Experimental
exposure to wood-smoke particles in health humans: effects on markers of inflammation, coagulation,
and lipid peroxidation. Inhal Toxicol, 18: 845-853. 091381
Barrett EG; Henson RD; Seilkop SK; McDonald JD; ReedMD. (2006). Effects of hardwood smoke exposure on
allergic airway inflammation in mice. Inhal Toxicol, 18: 33"43. 155677
Bartoli CR; Wellenius GA; Coull BA; Akiyama I; Diaz EA; Lawrence J; Okabe K; Verrier RL; Godleski JJ.
(2009). Concentrated ambient particles alter myocardial blood flow during acute ischemia in conscious
canines. Environ Health Perspect, 117: 333-337. 179904
Bartoli CR; Wellenius GA; Diaz EA; Lawrence J; Coull BA; Akiyama I; Lee LM; Okabe K; Verrier RL; Godleski
JJ. (2009). Mechanisms of Inhaled Fine Particulate Air Pollution-Induced Arterial Blood Pressure
Changes. Environ Health Perspect, 117: 361-366. 156256
July 2009
6-337
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Bartzokas A; Kassomenos P; Petrakis M> Celessides C. (2004). The effect of meteorological and pollution
parameters on the frequency of hospital admissions for cardiovascular and respiratory problems in
Athens. Indoor Built Environ, 13- 271-275. 093252
Bastain TM; Gilliland FD; Li Y_F> Saxon A; Diaz-Sanchez D. (2003). Intraindividual reproducibility of nasal
allergic responses to diesel exhaust particles indicates a susceptible phenotype. , 109- 130-136. 098690
Batalha JR; Saldiva P H; Clarke RW! Coull BA; Stearns RC; Lawrence J; Murthy GG; Koutrakis P; Godleski JJ.
(2002). Concentrated ambient air particles induce vasoconstriction of small pulmonary arteries in rats.
Environ Health Perspect, 110: 1191-1197. 088109
Becker Si Mundandhara Si Devlin RBi Madden M. (2005). Regulation of cytokine production in human alveolar
macrophages and airway epithelial cells in response to ambient air pollution particles' further
mechanistic studies. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 207: 269-275. 088590
Beckett WSi Chalupa DFi Pauly-Brown Ai Speers DMi Stewart JCi Frampton MWi Utell MJi Huang LSi Cox Ci
Zareba Wi Oberdorster G. (2005). Comparing inhaled ultrafine versus fine zinc oxide particles in healthy
adults - A human inhalation study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 171: 1129-1135. 156261
Bedeschi Ei Campari Ci Candela Si Collini Gi Caranci Ni Frasca Gi Galassi Ci Francesca Gi Vigotti MA. (2007).
Urban air pollution and respiratory emergency visits at pediatric unit, Reggio Emilia, Italy. J Toxicol
Environ Health A, 70: 261-265. 090712
Behndig AFi Mudway ISi Brown JLi Stenfors N Helleday R Duggan STi Wilson SJi Boman C Cassee FRi Frew
AJi Kelly FJi Sandstrom T Blomberg A. (2006). Airway antioxidant and inflammatory responses to diesel
exhaust exposure in healthy humans. Eur Respir J, 27: 359-365. 088286
Bell Mi Ebisu Ki Peng Ri Samet J; Dominici F. (2009). Hospital Admissions and Chemical Composition of Fine
Particle Air Pollution. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 179: 1115-1120. 191997
Bell ML; Dominici F; Ebisu Ki Zeger SL; Samet JM. (2007). Spatial and Temporal Variation in PM2. 5 Chemical
Composition in the United States for Health Effects Studies. , 115: 989. 155683
Bell ML; Ebisu K; Peng RD; Walker J; Samet JM; Zeger SL; Dominic F. (2008). Seasonal and regional short-
term effects of fine particles on hospital admissions in 202 U.S. counties, 1999-2005. Am J Epidemiol,
168: 1301-1310. 156266
Bell ML; Levy JK; Lin Z. (2008). The effect of sandstorms and air pollution on cause-specific hospital admissions
in Taipei, Taiwan. Occup Environ Med, 65: 104-111. 091268
Bennett CM; McKendry IG; Kelly S; Denike K; Koch T. (2006). Impact of the 1998 Gobi dust event on hospital
admissions in the Lower Fraser Valley, British Columbia. Sci Total Environ, 366: 918-925. 088061
Berger A; Zareba W; Schneider A; Ruckerl R; Ibald-Mulli A; Cyrys J; Wichmann HE; Peters A. (2006). Runs of
ventricular and supraventricular tachycardia triggered by air pollution in patients with coronary heart
disease. J Occup Environ Med, 48: 1149-58. 098702
Berger RD; Kasper EE Baughman KL; Marban E; Calkins H; Tomaselli GF. (1997). Beat"to"Beat QT Interval
Variability : Novel Evidence for Repolarization Lability in Ischemic and Nonischemic Dilated
Cardiomyopathy. , 96: 1557-1565. 155688
Blomberg A; Sainsbury C, Rudell B; Frew AJ; Holgate ST; Sandstrom T; Kelly FJ. (1998). Nasal cavity lining
fluid ascorbic acid concentration increases in healthy human volunteers following short term exposure to
diesel exhaust. Free Radic Res, 28: 59"67. 051246
Blomberg A; Tornqvist H; Desmyter L; Deneys V; Hermans C. (2005). Exposure to diesel exhaust nanoparticles
does not induce blood hypercoagulability in an at-risk population. J Thromb Haemost, 3: 2103-2105.
191991
Boezen HM; Vonk JM; Van Der Zee SC; Gerritsen J; Hoek G; Brunekreef B; Schouten JP; Postma DS. (2005).
Susceptibility to air pollution in elderly males and females. Eur Respir J, 25: 1018-1024. 087396
Bosson J; Barath S; Pourazar J; Behndig AF; Sandstrom T; Blomberg A; Adelroth E. (2008). Diesel exhaust
exposure enhances the ozone-induced airway inflammation in healthy humans. Eur Respir J, 31: 1234"
1240. 156287
Bosson J; Pourazar J; Forsberg B; Adelroth E; Sandstrom T; Blomberg A. (2007). Ozone enhances the airway
inflammation initiated by diesel exhaust. Respir Med, 101: 1140-1146. 156286
Bourotte C; Curi-Amarante A"P; Forti M"C; APereira LA; Braga AL; Lotufo PA. (2007). Association between
ionic composition of fine and coarse aerosol soluble fraction and peak expiratory flow of asthmatic
patients in Sao Paulo city (Brazil). Atmos Environ, 41: 2036-2048. 150040
Bouthillier L; Vincent R; Goegan P; Adamson IYR; Bjarnason S; Stewart M; Guenette J; Potvin M;
Kumarathasan P. (1998). Acute effects of inhaled urban particles and ozone: lung morphology,
macrophage activity, and plasma endothelin-1. Am J Pathol, 153: 1873-1884. 087110
Brauner EV; Forchhammer L; Moller P; Simonsen J; Glasius M; Wahlin P; Raaschou-Nielsen O; Loft S. (2007).
Exposure to ultrafine particles from ambient air and oxidative stress-induced DNA damage. , 115: 1177-
82.188507
July 2009
6-338
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Briet Mi Collin Ci Laurent Si Tan Ai Azizi Mi Agharazii Mi Jeunemaitre Xi Alhenc-Gelas Fi Boutouyrie P.
(2007). Endothelial function and chronic exposure to air pollution in normal male subjects. Hypertension,
50: 970-976. 093049
Brook RDi Brook JR; Urch Bi Vincent R; Rajagopalan Si Silverman F. (2002). Inhalation of fine particulate air
pollution and ozone causes acute arterial vasoconstriction in healthy adults. , 105- 1534-1536. 024987
Brauner EV; Mortensen J; Moller Pi Bernard Ai Vinzents Pi Wahlin Pi Glasius Mi Loft S. (2009). Effects of
ambient air particulate exposure on blood-gas barrier permeability andlung function. Inhal Toxicol, 21-
38-47. 191179
Brauner EV; Moller Pi Barregard Li Dragsted LCK Glasius Mi Wahlin Pi Vinzents Pi Raaschou-Nielsen Oi Loft
S. (2008). Exposure to ambient concentrations of particulate air pollution does not influence vascular
function or inflammatory pathways in young healthy individuals. Part Fibre Toxicol, 5- 13. 191966
Burnett RT; Brook J; Dann Ti Delocla Ci Philips Oi Cakmak Si Vincent Ri Goldberg MS; Krewski D. (2000).
Association between particulate- and gas-phase components of urban air pollution and daily mortality in
eight Canadian cities. Inhal Toxicol, 12- 15-39. 010273
Burnett RT; Cakmak Si Brook JR. (1998). The effect of the urban ambient air pollution mix on daily mortality
rates in 11 Canadian cities. Can J Public Health, 89- 152-156. 029505
Burnett RT; Cakmak Si Brook JR.; Krewski D. (1997). The role of particulate size and chemistry in the
association between summertime ambient air pollution and hospitalization for cardiorespiratory
diseases. Environ Health Perspect, 105: 614-620. 084194
Burnett RT; Dales R; Krewski D; Vincent R; Dann T; Brook JR. (1995). Associations between ambient
particulate sulfate and admissions to Ontario hospitals for cardiac and respiratory diseases. Am J
Epidemiol, 142: 15-22. 077226
Burnett RT; Goldberg MS. (2003). Size-fractionated particulate mass and daily mortality in eight Canadian
cities. 042798
Burnett RT; Smith-Doiron M; Stieb D; Cakmak S; Brook JR. (1999). Effects of particulate and gaseous air
pollution on cardiorespiratory hospitalizations. Arch Environ Occup Health, 54: 130-139. 017269
Burnett RT; Stieb D; Brook JR; Cakmak S; Dales R; Raizenne M; Vincent R; Dann T. (2004). Associations
between short-term changes in nitrogen dioxide and mortality in Canadian cities. Arch Environ Occup
Health, 59: 228-236. 086247
Burtscher H. (2005). Physical characterization of particulate emissions from diesel engines: a review. J Aerosol
Sci, 36: 896-932. 155710
Cakmak S; Dales R; Vida C. (2009). Components of particulate air pollution and mortality in Chile. Int J Occup
Environ Health, 15: 152. 191995
Calderon-Garciduenas L; Maronpot RR; Torres-Jardon R; Henriquez-Roldan C; Schoonhoven R; Acuna-Ayala H;
Villarreal-Calderon A; Nakamura J; Fernando R; Reed W; Azzarelli B; Swenberg JA. (2003). DNA
damage in nasal and brain tissues of canines exposed to air pollutants is associated with evidence of
chronic brain inflammation and neurodegeneration. Toxicol Pathol, 31: 524-538. 156316
Calderon-Garciduenas L; Mora-Tiscareno A; Ontiveros E; Gomez-Garza G; Barragan-Mejia G; Broadway J;
Chapman S; Valencia-Salazar G; Jewells V; Maronpot RR; Henriquez-Roldan C; Perez-Guille B; Torres-
Jardon R; Herrit L; Brooks D; Osnaya-Brizuela N; Monroy M. (2008). Air pollution, cognitive deficits and
brain abnormalities: A pilot study with children and dogs. Brain Cognit, 68: 117-127. 156317
Caligiuri G; Levy B; Pernow J; Thoren P; Hansson GK. (1999). Myocardial infarction mediated by endothelin
receptor signaling in hypercholesterolemia mice. Presented at . 156318
Campbell A; Oldham M; Becaria A; Bondy SC; Meacher D; Sioutas C; Misra C; Mendez LB; KLeinman M. (2005).
Particulate matter in polluted air may increase biomarkers of inflammation in mouse brain.
Neurotoxicology, 26: 133-140. 087217
Campen MJ; Babu NS; Helms GA; Pett S; Wernly J; Mehran R; McDonald JD. (2005). Nonparticulate
components of diesel exhaust promote constriction in coronary arteries from ApoE -/- mice. Toxicol Sci,
88: 95-102. 083977
Campen MJ; McDonald JD; Reed MD; Seagrave J. (2006). Fresh gasoline emissions, not paved road dust, alter
cardiac repolarization in ApoE-/- mice. Cardiovasc Toxicol, 6: 199-210. 096879
Carlsten C; Kaufman JD; Trenga CA; Allen J; Peretz A; Sullivan JH. (2008). Thrombotic markers in metabolic
syndrome subjects exposed to diesel exhaust. Inhal Toxicol, 20: 917-921. 156323
Carlsten C; Kaufman Joel D; Peretz A; Trenga Carol A; Sheppard L; Sullivan Jeffrey H. (2007). Coagulation
markers in healthy human subjects exposed to diesel exhaust. , 120: 849-855. 155714
Cassee FR; Boere AJF; Fokkens PHB; Leseman DLAC; Sioutas C; Kooter IM; Dormans JAMA. (2005).
Inhalation of concentrated particulate matter produces pulmonary inflammation and systemic biological
effects in compromised rats. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 68: 773-796. 087962
July 2009
6-339
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Chahine Ti Baccarelli A; Litonjua A; Wright RO; Suh H; Gold DR; Sparrow D; Vokonas P; Schwartz J. (2007).
Particulate air pollution, oxidative stress genes, and heart rate variability in an elderly cohort. Environ
Health Perspect, 115: 1617-1622. 156327
Chan C-C; Chuang K-J; Chien LrC> Chen W-J; Chang W"T. (2006). Urban air pollution and emergency
admissions for cerebrovascular diseases in Taipei, Taiwan. Eur Heart J, 27: 1238-1244. 090193
Chan CC; Chuang KJ; Chen WJ; Chang WT; Lee CT; Peng CM. (2008). Increasing cardiopulmonary emergency
visits by long-range transported Asian dust storms in Taiwan. Environ Res, 106: 393-400. 093297
Chan CC; Chuang KJ; Shiao GM; Lin LY. (2004). Personal exposure to submicrometer particles and heart rate
variability in human subjects. Environ Health Perspect, 112: 1063-1067. 087398
Chang C-C; Hwang J-S; Chan C"C; Wang P-Y; Cheng T-J. (2007). Effects of concentrated ambient particles on
heart rate, blood pressure, and cardiac contractility in spontaneously hypertensive rats during a dust
storm event. Inhal Toxicol, 19: 973-978. 155719
Chang C-C; Hwang J-S; Chan C"C; Wang P-Y; Hu T"H; Cheng T-J. (2004). Effects of concentrated ambient
particles on heart rate, blood pressure, and cardiac contractility in spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Inhal Toxicol, 16: 421-429. 055637
Chang CC; Hwang JS; Chan CC; Wang PY; Hu TH; Cheng TJ. (2005). Effects of concentrated ambient particles
on heart rate variability in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Occup Health, 47: 471-480. 088662
Chardon B; Lefranc A; Granados D; Gremy I. (2007). Air pollution and doctors' house calls for respiratory
diseases in the greater Paris area (2000-3). Occup Environ Med, 64: 320-4. 091308
Che W; Zhang Z; Zhang H; Wu M; Liang Y; Liu F; Shu Y; Li N. (2007). Compositions and oxidative damage of
condensate, particulate and semivolatile organic compounds from gasoline exhausts. Environ Toxicol
Pharmacol, 24: 11-18. 096460
Checkoway H; Levy D; Sheppard L; Kaufman J; Koenig J; Siscovick D. (2000). A case-crossover analysis of fine
particulate matter air pollution and out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest. 015527
Chen C-H; Xirasagar S; Lin H"C. (2006). Seasonality in adult asthma admissions, air pollutant levels, and
climate: a population-based study. J Asthma, 43: 287-292. 087947
Chen J; Schwartz J. (2009). Neurobehavioral effects of ambient air pollution on cognitive performance in US
adults. Neurotoxicology, 30: 231-239. 179945
Chen LC; Hwang JS. (2005). Effects of subchronic exposures to concentrated ambient particles (CAPs) in mice
IV Characterization of acute and chronic effects of ambient air fine particulate matter exposures on
heart-rate variability. Inhal Toxicol, 17: 209-216. 087218
Chen Y; Yang Q; Krewski D; Burnett RT; Shi Y; McGrail KM. (2005). The effect of coarse ambient particulate
matter on first, second, and overall hospital admissions for respiratory disease among the elderly. Inhal
Toxicol, 17: 649-655. 087555
Chen Y; Yang Q; Krewski D; Shi Y; Burnett RT; McGrail K. (2004). Influence of relatively low level of
particulate air pollution on hospitalization for COPD in elderly people. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 21-25. 087262
Cheng M-F; Tsai S"S; Wu T-N; Chen P-S; Yang C-Y. (2007). Air pollution and hospital admissions for
pneumonia in a tropical city: Kaohsiung, Taiwan. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 70: 2021-6. 093034
Chevalier P; Burri H; Adeleine P; Kirkorian G; Lopez M; Leizorovicz A; Andre-Fouet X; Chapon P; Rubel P;
Touboul P. (2003). QT dynamicity and sudden death after myocardial infarction: results of a long-term
follow-up study. , 14: 227-233. 156338
Chimonas MA; Gessner BD. (2007). Airborne particulate matter from primarily geologic, non-industrial sources
at levels below National Ambient Air Quality Standards is associated with outpatient visits for asthma
and quick-relief medication prescriptions among children less than 20 years old enrolled in Medicaid in
Anchorage, Alaska. Environ Res, 70: 2021-2026. 093261
Chiu H; Tiao M; Ho S; Kuo H; Wu T; Yang C. (2008). Effects of Asian Dust Storm events on hospital admissions
for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Taipei, Taiwan. Inhal Toxicol, 20: 777-781. 191989
Chock DP; Winkler SL; Chen C. (2000). A study of the association between daily mortality and ambient air
pollutant concentrations in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 50: 1481-1500. 010407
Choi JH; Xu QS; Park SY; Kim JH; Hwang SS; Lee KH; Lee HJ; Hong YC. (2007). Seasonal variation of effect of
air pollution on blood pressure. J Epidemiol Community Health, 61: 314-318. 093196
Chuang K-J; Chan C"C; Chen N"T; Su T-C; Lin L-Y. (2005). Effects of particle size fractions on reducing heart
rate variability in cardiac and hypertensive patients. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 1693-1697. 087989
Chuang K-J; Chan C"C; Su T"C; Lee C-T; Tang C-S. (2007). The effect of urban air pollution on inflammation,
oxidative stress, coagulation, and autonomic dysfunction in young adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med,
176: 370-6. 091063
Chuang KJ; Chan CC; Shiao GM; Su TC. (2005). Associations between submicrometer particles exposures and
blood pressure and heart rate in patients with lung function impairments. J Occup Environ Med, 47:
1093-1098. 156356
July 2009
6-340
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Chuang KJi Coull BAi Zanobetti A; Suh Hi Schwartz J; Stone PHi Litonjua A; Speizer FEi Gold DR. (2008).
Particulate Air Pollution as a Risk Factor for ST-Segment Depression in Patients With Coronary Artery
Disease. 155731
Ciencewicki J; Gowdy Ki Krantz QTi Linak WPi Brighton Li Gilmour ML Jaspers I. (2007). Diesel exhaust
enhanced susceptibility to influenza infection is associated with decreased surfactant protein expression.
, 19: 1121-33. 096557
Clancy Li Goodman Pi Sinclair Hi Dockery DW. (2002). Effect of air pollution control on death rates in Dublin,
Ireland: an intervention study. Lancet, 360: 1210-1214. 035270
Clarke RW; Catalano Pi Coull B; Koutrakis Pi Krishna Murthy GG; Rice T; Godleski JJ. (2000). Age-related
responses in rats to concentrated urban air particles (CAPs). Presented at In: Phalen, R. F., ed.
Inhalation toxicology: proceedings of the third colloquium on particulate air pollution and human health
(first special issue); June, 1999; Durham, NC. Inhalation Toxicol. 12(suppl. l): 73"84. 011806
Coleridge HM! Coleridge JCG. (1994). Pulmonary Reflexes: Neural Mechanisms of Pulmonary Defense. Annu
Rev Physiol, 56: 69-91. 156362
Courtois A; Andujar Pi Ladeiro Yi Baudrimont L Delannoy Ei Leblais V; Begueret Hi Galland MABi Brochard Pi
Marano F. (2008). Impairment of NODependent Relaxation in Intralobar Pulmonary Arteries:
Comparison of Urban Particulate Matter and Manufactured Nanoparticles. Environ Health Perspect,
116: 1294. 156369
Cozzi Ei Hazarika Si Stallings HWi Cascio WEi Devlin RBi Lust RMi Wingard CJi Van Scott MR. (2006).
Ultrafine particulate matter exposure augments ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice. Am J Physiol, 291:
H894-H903.091380
Cruts Bi van Etten Li Tornqvist Hi Blomberg Ai Sandstrom Ti Mills NLi Borm PJ. (2008). Exposure to diesel
exhaust induces changes in EEG in human volunteers. Part Fibre Toxicol, 5- 4. 156374
Cardenas Mi Vallejo Mi Romano-Riquer Pi Ruiz-Velasco Si Ferreira-Vidal ADi Hermosillo AG. (2008). Personal
exposure to PM2.5 air pollution and heart rate variability in subjects with positive or negative head-up
tilt test. Environ Res, 108: 1-6. 191900
D'Ippoliti Di Forastiere Fi Ancona Ci Agabiti Ni Fusco Di Michelozzi Pi Perucci CA. (2003). Air pollution and
myocardial infarction in Rome: a case-crossover analysis. , 14: 528-535. 074311
Dales R. (2004). Ambient carbon monoxide may influence heart rate variability in subjects with coronary artery
disease. J Occup Environ Med, 46: 1217-21. 099036
Dales Ri Liu L; Szyszkowicz M; Dalipaj M; Willey J; Kulka R; Ruddy TD. (2007). Particulate air pollution and
vascular reactivity: the bus stop study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 81: 159-164. 155743
Daniels MJi Dominici Fi Zeger SLi Samet JM. (2004). The national morbidity, mortality, and air pollution study
Part III: PM10 concentration-response curves and thresholds for the 20 largest US cities. 087343
Danielsen PHi Brauner EVi Barregard Li Sallsten Gi Wallin Mi Olinski Ri Rozalski Ri Moller Pi Loft S. (2008).
Oxidatively damaged DNA and its repair after experimental exposure to wood smoke in healthy humans.
, 642: 37-42. 156382
Day KCi Reed MDi McDonald JDi Keilkop SKi Barrett EG. (2008). Effects of Gasoline Engine Emissions on
Preexisting Allergic Airway Responses in Mice. Inhal Toxicol, 20: 1145-1155. 190204
De Bruin MLi van Hemel NMi Leufkens HGi Hoes AW. (2005). Hospital discharge diagnoses of ventricular
arrhythmias and cardiac arrest were useful for epidemiologic research. , 58: 1325-1329. 155746
de Haar Ci Hassing Ii Bol Mi Bleumink Ri Pieters R. (2005). Ultrafine carbon black particles cause early airway
inflammation and have adjuvant activity in a mouse allergic airway disease model. , 87: 409-418. 097872
de Haar Ci Hassing Ii Bol Mi Bleumink Ri Pieters R. (2006). Ultrafine but not fine particulate matter causes
airway inflammation and allergic airway sensitization to co-administered antigen in mice. Clin Exp
Allergy, 36: 1469-1479. 144746
De Hartog JJi Hoek Gi Peters Ai Timonen KLi Ibald-Mulli Ai Brunekreef Bi Heinrich Ji Tiittanen Pi Van
Wijnen JHi Kreyling Wi Kulmala Mi Pekkanen J. (2003). Effects of fine and ultrafine particles on
cardiorespiratory symptoms in elderly subjects with coronary heart disease: the ULTRA study. Am J
Epidemiol, 157: 613-623. 001061
Delfino Ri Brummel Si Wu Ji Stern Hi Ostro Bi Lipsett Mi Winer Ai Street Di Zhang Li Tjoa T. (2009). The
relationship of respiratory and cardiovascular hospital admissions to the southern California wildfires of
2003. Occup Environ Med, 66: 189. 191994
Delfino RJi Chang Ji Wu Ji Ren Ci Tjoa Ti Nickerson Bi Cooper Di Gillen DL. (2009). Repeated hospital
encounters for asthma in children and exposure to traffic-related air pollution near the home. Ann
Allergy Asthma Immunol, 102: 138-44. 190254
Delfino RJi Coate BDi Zeiger RSi Seltzer JMi Street DHi Koutrakis P. (1996). Daily asthma severity in relation
to personal ozone exposure and outdoor fungal spores. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 154: 633-641. 080788
July 2009
6-341
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Delfino RJ; Gone H; Linn WS; Pellizzari ED; Hu Y. (2003). Asthma symptoms in Hispanic children and daily
ambient exposures to toxic and criteria air pollutants. Environ Health Perspect, 111 - 647-656. 050460
Delfino RJ; Gong H; Linn WS; Hu Y; Pellizzari ED. (2003). Respiratory symptoms and peak expiratory flow in
children with asthma in relation to volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath and ambient air. J
Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 13: 348-363. 090941
Delfino RJ; Murphy-Moulton AM; Becklake MR. (1998). Emergency room visits for respiratory illnesses among
the elderly in Montreal: association with low level ozone exposure. Environ Res, 76' 61-11. 093624
Delfino RJ; Quintana PJE; Floro J; Gastanaga VM; Samimi BS; KLeinman MT; Liu L-JS; Bufalino C; Wu OF;
McLaren CE. (2004). Association of FEV1 in asthmatic children with personal and microenvironmental
exposure to airborne particulate matter. Environ Health Perspect, 112: 932-941. 056897
Delfino RJ; Staimer N; Gillen D; Tjoa T; Sioutas C; Fung K; George SC; Kleinman MT. (2006). Personal and
ambient air pollution is associated with increased exhaled nitric oxide in children with asthma. Environ
Health Perspect, 114: 1736-1743. 090745
Delfino RJ; Staimer N; Tjoa T; Polidori A; Arhami M; Gillen DL; Kleinman MT; Vaziri ND; Longhurst J;
Zaldivar F; Sioutas C. (2008). Circulating biomarkers of inflammation, antioxidant activity, and platelet
activation are associated with primary combustion aerosols in subjects with coronary artery disease.
Environ Health Perspect, 116: 898-906. 156390
Delfino RJ; Zeiger RS; Seltzer JM; Street DH. (1998). Symptoms in pediatric asthmatics and air pollution:
differences in effects by symptom severity, anti"inflammatory medication use and particulate averaging
time. Environ Health Perspect, 106: 751-761. 051406
Delfino RJ; Zeiger RS; Seltzer JM; Street DH; McLaren CE. (2002). Association of asthma symptoms with peak
particulate air pollution and effect modification by anti-inflammatory medication use. Environ Health
Perspect, 110: A607-A617. 093740
DeMeo DL; Zanobetti A; Litonjua AA; Coull BA; Schwartz J; Gold DR. (2004). Ambient air pollution and oxygen
saturation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 170: 383-387. 087346
Desqueyroux H; Pujet J-G Prosper M; Squinazi F; Momas I. (2002). Short-term effects of low-level air pollution
on respiratory health of adults suffering from moderate to severe asthma. Environ Res, 89: 29"37. 026052
Deurloo DT; van Esch BO Hofstra CL; Nijkamp FP; van Oosterhout AJ. (2001). CTLA4"IgG reverses asthma
manifestations in a mild but not in a more "severe" ongoing murine model. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol, 25:
751-760. 156396
Devlin RB; Ghio AJ; Kehrl H; Sanders G; Cascio W. (2003). Elderly humans exposed to concentrated air
pollution particles have decreased heart rate variability. Eur Respir J, 40: 76S-80S. 087348
de Hartog JJ; Lanki T; Timonen KL; Hoek G; Janssen NA; Ibald-Mulli A; Peters A; Heinrich J; Tarkiainen TH;
van Grieken R; van Wijnen JH; Brunekreef B; Pekkanen J. (2009). Associations between PM2.5 and
heart rate variability are modified by particle composition and beta-blocker use in patients with coronary
heart disease. Environ Health Perspect, 117: 105-111. 191904
Diaz-Sanchez D; Garcia MP; Wang M; Jyrala M; Saxon A. (1999). Nasal challenge with diesel exhaust particles
can induce sensitization to a neoallergen in the human mucosa. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 104: 1183-1188.
011346
Diaz-Sanchez D; Tsien A; Fleming J; Saxon A. (1997). Combined diesel exhaust particulate and ragweed
allergen challenge markedly enhances human in vivo nasal ragweed-specific IgE and skews cytokine
production to a T helper cell 2"type pattern. J Immunol, 158: 2406-2413. 051247
Dick CA; Singh P; Daniels M; Evansky P; Becker S; Gilmour MI. (2003). Murine pulmonary inflammatory
responses following instillation of size-fractionated ambient particulate matter. J Toxicol Environ Health
A, 66: 2193-2207. 088776
Diez-Roux AV; Auchincloss AH; Astor B; Barr RG; Cushman M; Dvonch T; Jacobs DR Jr; Kaufman J; Lin X;
Samson Px. (2006). Recent exposure to particulate matter and Oreactive protein concentration in the
multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis x. Am J Epidemiol, 164: 437-448. 156400
Dockery DW; Luttmann-Gibson H; Rich DQ; Link MS; Mittleman MA; Gold DR; Koutrakis P; Schwartz JD;
Verrier RL. (2005). Association of air pollution with increased incidence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias
recorded by implanted cardioverter defibrillators. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 670-674. 078995
Dockery DW; Luttmann-Gibson H; Rich DQ; Link MS; Schwartz JD; Gold DR; Koutrakis P; Verrier RL;
Mittleman MA. (2005). Particulate air pollution and nonfatal cardiac events Part II Association of air
pollution with confirmed arrhythmias recorded by implanted defibrillators. 090743
Dominici F; McDermott A; Daniels M; Zeger SL; Samet J. (2003). Revised Analyses of Time-Series Studies of Air
Pollution and Health: Mortality Among Residents of 90 Cities. 156407
Dominici F; McDermott A; Zeger SL; Samet JM. (2002). On the use of generalized additive models in time-series
studies of air pollution and health. Am J Epidemiol, 156: 193-203. 030458
July 2009
6-342
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Dominici Fi Peng RD; Bell ML; Pham L; McDermott A; Zeger SL; Samet JL. (2006). Fine particulate air
pollution and hospital admission for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. JAMA, 295- 1127-1134.
088398
Dominici F> Peng RD; Ebisu K; Zeger SL; Samet JM; Bell ML. (2007). Does the effect of PM10 on mortality
depend on PM nickel and vanadium content? A reanalysis of the NMMAPS data. Environ Health
Perspect, 115: 1701-3. 099135
Dominici F; Peng RD; Zeger SL; White RH; Samet JM. (2007). Particulate air pollution and mortality in the
United States: did the risks change from 1987 to 2000?. Am J Epidemiol, 166: 880-8. 097361
Dubowsky SD; Suh H; Schwartz J; Coull BA; Gold DR. (2006). Diabetes, obesity, and hypertension may enhance
associations between air pollution and markers of systemic inflammation. Environ Health Perspect, 114:
992-998. 088750
Dusek R; Frank GP; Hildebrandt L; Curtius J; Schneider J; Walter S; Chand D; Drewnick F; Hings S; Jung D;
Borrmann S; Andreae MO. (2006). Size matters more than chemistry for cloud-nucleating ability of
aerosol particles. 1375-1378. 155756
Duvall RM; Norris GA; Dailey LA; Burke JM; McGee JK; Gilmour MI; Gordon T; Devlin RB. (2008). Source
apportionment of particulate matter in the US and associations with lung inflammatory markers. Inhal
Toxicol, 20: 671-83. 097969
Dvonch JT; Brook RD; Keeler GJ; Rajagopalan S; D'Alecy LG; Marsik FJ; Morishita M; Yip FY; Brook JR;
Timm EJ; Wagner JG; Harkema JR. (2004). Effects of concentrated fine ambient particles on rat plasma
levels of asymmetric dimethylarginine. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 473-480. 055741
Ebelt ST; Wilson WE; Brauer M. (2005). Exposure to ambient and nonambient components of particulate
matter: a comparison of health effects. Epidemiology, 16: 396-405. 056907
Elder A; Gelein R; Finkelstein J; Phipps R; Frampton M; Utell M; Kittelson DB; Watts WF; Hopke P; Jeong CH;
Kim E; Liu W; Zhao W; Zhuo L; Vincent R; Kumarathasan P; Oberdorster G. (2004). On-road exposure to
highway aerosols 2 Exposures of aged, compromised rats. Inhal Toxicol, 16 Suppl l: 41-53. 087354
Elder ACP; Gelein R; Azadniv M; Frampton M; Finkelstein J; Oberdorster G. (2004). Systemic effects of inhaled
ultrafine particles in two compromised, aged rat strains. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 461-471. 055642
Erbas B; Kelly A"M; Physick B; Code C; Edwards M. (2005). Air pollution and childhood asthma emergency
hospital admissions: estimating intra-city regional variations. Int J Environ Health Res, 15: 11-20.
073849
Fairley D. (2003). Mortality and air pollution for Santa Clara County, California, 1989-1996. 042850
Fakhri AA; Ilic LM; Wellenius GA; Urch B; Silverman F; Gold DR; Mittleman MA. (2009). Autonomic effects of
controlled fine particulate exposure in young healthy adults: Effect modification by ozone. Environ
Health Perspect, In Press: In Press. 191914
Fan Z; Meng Q; Weisel C; Laumbach R; Ohman-Strickland P; Shalat S; Hernandez M; Black K. (2008). Acute
exposure to elevated PM (2.5) generated by traffic and cardiopulmonary health effects in healthy older
adults. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 19: 525-533. 191979
Farraj AK; Haykal-Coates N; Ledbetter AD; Evansky PA; Gavett SH. (2006). Inhibition of pan neurotrophin
receptor p75 attenuates diesel particulate "induced enhancement of allergic airway responses in
C57/B16J mice. Inhal Toxicol, 18: 483-491. 088469
Farraj AK; Haykal-Coates N; Ledbetter AD; Evansky PA; Gavett SH. (2006). Neurotrophin mediation of allergic
airways responses to inhaled diesel particles in mice. , 94: 183-92. 141730
Fedulov AV; Leme A; Yang Z; Dahl M; Lim R; Mariani TJ; Kobzik L. (2008). Pulmonary exposure to particles
during pregnancy causes increased neonatal asthma susceptibility. , 38: 57"67. 097482
Ferdinands JM; Crawford CA; Greenwald R; Van Sickle D; Hunter E; Teague WG. (2008). Breath acidification
in adolescent runners exposed to atmospheric pollution: a prospective, repeated measures observational
study. Environ Health, 7: 10. 156433
Finnerty K; Choi J-E; Lau A; Davis-Gorman G; Diven C; Seaver N> Linak William P; Witten M; McDonagh Paul
F. (2007). Instillation of coarse ash particulate matter and lipopolysaccharide produces a systemic
inflammatory response in mice. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 70: 1957-1966. 156434
Fischer PH; Steerenberg PA; Snelder JD; Van Loveren H; Van Amsterdam JGC. (2002). Association between
exhaled nitric oxide, ambient air pollution and respiratory health in school children. Int Arch Occup
Environ Health, 75: 348-353. 025731
Fischer SL; Koshland CP. (2007). Daily and peak 1 h indoor air pollution and driving factors in a rural Chinese
village. Environ Sci Technol, 41: 3121-3126. 156435
Folino AF; Scapellato ML; Canova C; Maestrelli P; Bertorelli G; Simonato L; Iliceto S; Lotti M. (2009).
Individual exposure to particulate matter and the short-term arrhythmic and autonomic profiles in
patients with myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J, 30: 1614-1620. 191902
July 2009
6-343
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Forastiere F; Stafoggia M; Berti G; Bisanti L; Cernigliaro A; Chiusolo M; Mallone S; Miglio R; Pandolfi P;
Rognoni M; Serinelli M; Tessari R; Vigotti M; Perucci C. (2008). Particulate Matter and Daily Mortality:
A Case-Crossover Analysis of Individual Effect Modifiers. Epidemiology, 19: 571-580. 186937
Forastiere F; Stafoggia M; Picciotto S; Bellander T; D'Ippoliti D; Lanki T; Von Klot S; Nyberg F; Paatero P;
Peters A; Pekkanen J; Sunyer J; Perucci CA. (2005). A case-crossover analysis of out-of-hospital coronary
deaths and air pollution in Rome, Italy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 172: 1549-1555. 086323
Frampton MW. (2001). Systemic and cardiovascular effects of airway injury and inflammation: ultrafine particle
exposure in humans. Environ Health Perspect, 109: 529-532. 019051
Frampton MW; Stewart JC; Oberdorster G; Morrow PE; Chalupa D; Pietropaoli AP; Frasier LM; Speers DM;
Cox C; Huang LS; Utell MJ. (2006). Inhalation of ultrafine particles alters blood leukocyte expression of
adhesion molecules in humans. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 51-58. 088665
Franklin M; Koutrakis P; Schwartz J. (2008). PM25 composition & daily mortality in 25 US communities.
097426
Franklin M; Koutrakis P; Schwartz J. (2008). The role of particle composition on the association between PM2.5
and mortality. Epidemiology, 19: 680-689. 155779
Franklin M; Zeka A; Schwartz J. (2007). Association between PM2.5 and all-cause and specific-cause mortality
in 27 US communities. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 17: 279-287. 091257
Fung KY; Khan S; Krewski D; Chen Y. (2006). Association between air pollution and multiple respiratory
hospitalizations among the elderly in Vancouver, Canada. Inhal Toxicol, 18: 1005-1011. 089789
Fung KY; Luginaah IKMG; Webster G. (2005). Air pollution and daily hospitalization rates for cardiovascular
and respiratory diseases in London, Ontario. Int J Environ Stud, 62: 677-685. 093262
Galan I; Tobias A; Banegas JR; Aranguez E. (2003). Short-term effects of air pollution on daily asthma
emergency room admissions. Eur Respir J, 22: 802-808. 087408
Gavett SH; Haykal-Coates N> Copeland L B; Heinrich J; Gilmour MI. (2003). Metal composition of ambient
PM2.5 influences severity of allergic airways disease in mice. Environ Health Perspect, 111: 1471-1477.
053153
Gehlbach BE Geppert E. (2004). The pulmonary manifestations of left heart failure. , 125: 669-682. 155784
Geiser M; Rothen-Rutishauser B; Kapp N> Schurch S; Kreyling W', Schulz H; Semmler M; Im Hof V; Heyder J;
Gehr P. (2005). Ultrafine particles cross cellular membranes by nonphagocytic mechanisms in lungs and
in cultured cells. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 1555-1560. 087362
Gent JF; Koutrakis P; Belanger K; Triche E; Holford TR; Bracken MB; Leaderer BP. (2009). Symptoms and
medication use in children with asthma and traffic-related sources of fine particle pollution. Environ
Health Perspect, In Press: 1-41. 180399
Gent JF; Triche EW; Holford TR; Belanger K; Bracken MB; Beckett WS; Leaderer BP. (2003). Association of
low-level ozone and fine particles with respiratory symptoms in children with asthma. JAMA, 290: 1859"
1867. 052885
Gerlofs-Nijland ME; Rummelhard M; Boere AJF; Leseman DLAC; Duffin R; Schins RPF; Borm PJA; Sillanpaa
M; Salonen RO; Cassee FR. (2009). Particle induced toxicity in relation to transition metal and polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbon contents . Environ Sci Technol, In Press: 1-8. 190353
Gerlofs-Nijland ME; Dormans JA; Bloemen HJ; Leseman DL; John A; Boere F; Kelly FJ; Mudway IS; Jimenez
AA; Donaldson K; Guastadisegni C; Janssen NA; Brunekreef B; Sandstrom T; van Bree L; Cassee FR.
(2007). Toxicity of coarse and fine particulate matter from sites with contrasting traffic profiles. , 19:
1055-69. 097840
Ghelfi E; Rhoden CR; Wellenius GA; Lawrence J; Gonzalez-Flecha B. (2008). Cardiac oxidative stress and
electrophysiological changes in rats exposed to concentrated air particles are mediated by TRP"
dependent pulmonary reflexes. Toxicol Sci, 102: 328-336. 156468
Ghio AJ; Devlin RB. (2001). Inflammatory lung injury after bronchial instillation of air pollution particles. Am J
Respir Crit Care Med, 164: 704-708. 017122
Ghio AJ; Hall A; Bassett MA; Cascio WE; Devlin RB. (2003). Exposure to concentrated ambient air particles
alters hematologic indices in humans. Inhal Toxicol, 15: 1465-1478. 087363
Ghio AJ; Kim C; Devlin RB. (2000). Concentrated ambient air particles induce mild pulmonary inflammation in
healthy human volunteers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 162: 981-988. 012140
Gilliland FD; Li YF; Saxon A; Diaz-Sanchez D. (2004). Effect of glutathione-S-transferase Ml and PI genotypes
on xenobiotic enhancement of allergic responses: randomised, placebo-controlled crossover study. Lancet,
363: 119-125. 156471
Gilmour MI; McGee J; Duvall Rachelle M; Dailey L; Daniels M; Boykin E; Cho S"H; Doerfler D; Gordon T;
Devlin Robert B. (2007). Comparative toxicity of size-fractionated airborne particulate matter obtained
from different cities in the United States. , 19 Suppl l: 7" 16. 096433
July 2009
6-344
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Gilmour ML O'Connor Si Dick CAJi Miller CAi Linak WP. (2004). Differential pulmonary inflammation and in
vitro cytotoxicity of size-fractionated fly ash particles from pulverized coal combustion. J Air Waste
Manag Assoc, 54: 286-295. 057420
Gilmour PSi Ziesenis Ai Morrison ERi Vickers MAi Drost EMi Ford Ii Karg Ei Mossa Ci Schroeppel Ai Ferron
GAi Heyder J; Greaves Mi MacNee W', Donaldson K. (2004). Pulmonary and systemic effects of short-
term inhalation exposure to ultrafine carbon black particles. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 195: 35"44. 054175
Girardot SPi Ryan PBi Smith SMi Davis WTi Hamilton CBi Obenour RAi Renfro JR; Tromatore KA; Reed GD.
(2006). Ozone and PM25 exposure and acute pulmonary health effects: a study of hikers in the Great
Smoky Mountains National Park. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 612-617. 088271
Godleski JJi Clarke RWi Coull BAi Saldiva PHNi Jiang NFi Lawrence J; Koutrakis P. (2002). Composition of
inhaled urban air particles determines acute pulmonary responses. Ann Occup Hyg, 46: 419-424. 156478
Godleski JJi Verrier RLi Koutrakis Pi Catalano Pi Coull Bi Reinisch U> Lovett EG; Lawrence J; Murthy GG;
Wolfson JM; Clarke RW! Nearing BD; Killingsworth C. (2000). Mechanisms of morbidity and mortality
from exposure to ambient air particles. , 91: 5"88; discussion 89-103. 000738
Gold DR; Litonjua AA; Zanobetti A; Coull BA; Schwartz J; MacCallum G; Verrier RL; Nearing BD; Canner MJ;
Suh H; Stone PH. (2005). Air pollution and ST-segment depression in elderly subjects. Environ Health
Perspect, 113: 883-887. 087558
Goldberg MS; Giannetti N; Burnett RT; Mayo NE; Valois MF; Brophy JM. (2008). A panel study in congestive
heart failure to estimate the short-term effects from personal factors and environmental conditions on
oxygen saturation and pulse rate. Occup Environ Med, 65: 659-666. 180380
Gong H Jri Sioutas C; Linn WS. (2003). Controlled exposures of healthy and asthmatic volunteers to
concentrated ambient particles in metropolitan Los Angeles. 087365
Gong H; Sioutas C; Linn WS; Clark KW; Terrell SL; Terrell LL; Anderson KR; Kim S; Chang MC. (2000).
Controlled human exposures to concentarted ambient fine particles in metropolitan Los Angeles:
Methodology and preliminary health-effect findings. Inhal Toxicol, 12: 107-119. 155799
Gong H Jri Linn WS; Clark KW; Anderson KR; Geller MD; Sioutas C. (2005). Respiratory responses to
exposures with fine particulates and nitrogen dioxide in the elderly with and without COPD. Inhal
Toxicol, 17: 123-132. 087921
Gong H Jr; Linn WS; Clark KW; Anderson KR; Sioutas C; Alexis NE; Cascio WE; Devlin RB. (2008). Exposures
of healthy and asthmatic volunteers to concentrated ambient ultrafine particles in Los Angeles. Inhal
Toxicol, 20: 533-545. 156483
Gong H Jri Linn WS; Sioutas C; Terrell SL; Clark KW; Anderson KR; Terrell LL. (2003). Controlled exposures
of healthy and asthmatic volunteers to concentrated ambient fine particles in Los Angeles. Inhal Toxicol,
15: 305-325. 042106
Gong H Jri Linn WS; Terrell SL; Anderson KR; Clark KW; Sioutas C; Cascio WE; Alexis N; Devlin RB. (2004).
Exposures of elderly volunteers with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to
concentrated ambient fine particulate pollution. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 731-744. 087964
Gong H Jr; Linn WS; Terrell SL; Clark KW; Geller MD; Anderson KR; Cascio WE; Sioutas C. (2004). Altered
heart-rate variability in asthmatic and healthy volunteers exposed to concentrated ambient coarse
particles. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 335-343. 055628
Gordian ME; Choudhury AH. (2003). PM10 and asthma medication in schoolchildren. Arch Environ Occup
Health, 58: 42-47. 054842
Gowdy K; Krantz QT; Daniels M; Linak WP; Jaspers I; Gilmour MI. (2008). Modulation of pulmonary
inflammatory responses and antimicrobial defenses in mice exposed to diesel exhaust. Toxicol Appl
Pharmacol, 229(3): 310-319. 097226
Graff D; Cascio W; Rappold A; Zhou H; Huang Y; Devlin R. (2009). Exposure to concentrated coarse air pollution
particles causes mild cardiopulmonary effects in healthy young adults . Environ Health Perspect, 117:
1089-1094. 191981
Gurgueira SA; Lawrence J; Coull B; Murthy GGK; Gonzalez-Flecha B. (2002). Rapid increases in the steady-
state concentration of reactive oxygen species in the lungs and heart after particulate air pollution
inhalation. Environ Health Perspect, 110: 749-755. 036535
Hajat S; Haines A; Atkinson RW! Bremner SA; Anderson HR; Emberlin J. (2001). Association between air
pollution and daily consultations with general practitioners for allergic rhinitis in London, United
Kingdom. Am J Epidemiol, 153: 704-714. 016693
Halonen JI; Lanki T; Yli-Tuomi T; Kulmala M; Tiittanen P; Pekkanen J. (2008). Urban air pollution, and
asthma and COPD hospital emergency room visits. Thorax, 63: 635-41. 189507
Halonen JI; Lanki T; Yli-Tuomi T; Tiittanen P; Kulmala M; Pekkanen. (2009). Particulate air pollution and
acute cardiorespiratory hospital admissions and mortality among the elderly. Epidemiology, 20: 143-153.
180379
July 2009
6-345
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Hamada Ki Suzaki Y> Leme A; Ito T> Miyamoto Ki Kobzik L> Kimura H. (2007). Exposure of pregnant mice to an
air pollutant aerosol increases asthma susceptibility in offspring. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 70- 688"
695. 091235
Hamade AK; Rabold R; Tankersley CG. (2008). Adverse cardiovascular effects with acute particulate matter and
ozone exposures' interstrain variation in mice. Environ Health Perspect, 116- 1033-1039. 156515
Hanigan ICi Johnston FH; Morgan GG. (2008). Vegetation fire smoke, indigenous status and cardio respiratory
hospital admissions in Darwin, Australia, 1996-2005- a time-series study. , 7- 42. 156518
Hao Mi Cornier Si Wang Mi Lee James Ji Nel A. (2003). Diesel exhaust particles exert acute effects on airway
inflammation and function in murine allergen provocation models. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 112- 905-914.
096565
Hapcioglu Bi Issever Hi Kocyigit E> Disci R; Vatansever Si Ozdilli K. (2006). The effect of air pollution and
meteorological parameters on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at an Istanbul hospital. Indoor Built
Environ, 15: 147-153. 093263
Happo MS; Salonen RCK Halinen AI; Jalava PI; Pennanen AS; Kosma VM; Sillanpaa M; Hillamo R; Brunekreef
B; Katsouyanni K; Sunyer J; Hirvonen MR. (2007). Dose and time dependency of inflammatory responses
in the mouse lung to urban air coarse, fine, and ultrafine particles from six European cities. , 19: 227"
246. 096630
Harder V; Gilmour P; Lentner B; Karg E; Takenaka S; Ziesenis A; Stampfl A; Kodavanti U; Heyder J; Schulz H.
(2005). Cardiovascular responses in unrestrained WKY rats to inhaled ultrafine carbon particles. Inhal
Toxicol, 17: 29-42. 087371
Harkema JR; Keeler G; Wagner J; Morishita M; Timm E; Hotchkiss J; Marsik F; Dvonch T; Kaminski N; Barr
E. (2004). Effects of concentrated ambient particles on normal and hypersecretory airways in rats.
056842
Harrod KS; Jaramillo RJ; Berger JA; Gigliotti AP; Seilkop SK; Reed MD. (2005). Inhaled diesel engine
emissions reduce bacterial clearance and exacerbate lung disease to Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in
vivo. Toxicol Sci, 83: 155-165. 088144
Harrod KS; Jaramillo RJ; Rosenberger CL; Wang S"Z; Berger JA; McDonald JD; Reed MD. (2003). Increased
susceptibility to RSV infection by exposure to inhaled diesel engine emissions. , 28: 451-463. 097046
Hayek T; Oiknine J; Brook JG; Aviram M. (1994). Increased plasma and lipoprotein lipid peroxidation in apo E-
deficient mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 201: 1567-1574. 156527
Hedley AJ; Wong C"M; Thach TQ; Ma S; Lam T-H; Anderson HR. (2002). Cardiorespiratory and all-cause
mortality after restrictions on sulphur content of fuel in Hong Kong: an intervention study. Lancet, 360:
1646-1652. 040284
Heidenfelder BL; Reif DM; Harkema JR; Cohen Hubal EA; Hudgens EE; Bramble LA; Wagner JG; Morishita M;
Keeler GJ; Edwards SW; Gallagher JE. (2009). Comparative microarray analysis and pulmonary changes
in brown norway rats exposed to ovalbumin and concentrated air particulates. Toxicol Sci, 108: 207-221.
190026
Henneberger A; Zareba W', Ibald-Mulli A; Ruckerl R; Cyrys J; Couderc J-P; Mykins B; Woelke G; Wichmann H-
E; Peters A. (2005). Repolarization changes induced by air pollution in ischemic heart disease patients.
Environ Health Perspect, 113: 440-446. 087960
Henrotin JB; Besancenot JP; Bejot Y; Giroud M. (2007). Short-term effects of ozone air pollution on ischaemic
stroke occurrence: a case-crossover analysis from a 10-year population-based study in Dijon, France.
Occup Environ Med, 64: 439-445. 093270
Hinwood AL; De Klerk N> Rodriguez C; Jacoby P; Runnion T; Rye P; Landau L; Murray F; Feldwick M; Spickett
J. (2006). The relationship between changes in daily air pollution and hospitalizations in Perth, Australia
1992-1998: a case-crossover study. Int J Environ Health Res, 16: 27"46. 088976
Hirshon JM; Shardell M; Alles S; Powell JL; Squibb K; Ondov J; Blaisdell CJ. (2008). Elevated ambient air zinc
increases pediatric asthma morbidity. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 826-831. 180375
Hogervorst JG; de Kok TM; Briede JJ; Wesseling G; Kleinjans JC; van Schayck CP. (2006). Relationship
between radical generation by urban ambient particulate matter and pulmonary function of school
children. , 69: 245-62. 189460
Holguin F; Flores S; Ross Z; Cortez M; Molina M; Molina L; Rincon C; Jerrett M; Berhane K; Granados A;
Romieu I. (2007). Traffic-related exposures, airway function, inflammation, and respiratory symptoms in
children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 176: 1236-42. 099000
Holguin F; Tellez-Rojo MM; Hernandez M; Cortez M; Chow JC; Watson JG; Mannino D; Romieu I. (2003). Air
pollution and heart rate variability among the elderly in Mexico City. , 14: 521-527. 057326
Holloman CH; Bortnick SM; Morara M; Strauss WJ; Calder CA. (2004). A Bayesian hierarchical approach for
relating PM2.5 exposure to cardiovascular mortliaty in North Carolina. Environ Health Perspect, 112:
1282-1288. 087375
July 2009
6-346
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Hong Y-C; Hwang S-S; Kim JH; Lee K-H; Lee H-J; Lee K-H; Yu S-D; Kim D-S. (2007). Metals in particulate
pollutants affect peak expiratory flow of schoolchildren. Environ Health Perspect, 115- 430-434. 091347
Hopke PE Ito E Mar T; Christensen WF; Eatough DJ; Henry RC; Kim E; Laden F; Lall R; Larson TV; Liu H;
Neas L; Pinto J; Stolzel M; Suh H; Paatero P; Thurston GD. (2006). PM source apportionment and health
effects' 1 Intercomparison of source apportionment results. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 16- 275-286.
088390
Host S; Larrieu S; Pascal L; Blanchard M; Declercq C; Fabre P; Jusot JF; Chardon B; Le Tertre A; Wagner V;
Prouvost H; Lefranc A. (2007). Short-term Associations between Fine and Coarse Particles and
Cardiorespiratory Hospitalizations in Six French Cities. Occup Environ Med. 155851
Host S; Larrieu S; Pascal L; Blanchard M; Declercq C; Fabre P; Jusot JF; Chardon B; Le Tertre A; Wagner V;
Prouvost H; Lefranc A. (2008). Short-term associations between fine and coarse particles and hospital
admissions for cardiorespiratory diseases in six French cities. Occup Environ Med, 65- 544-551. 155852
Huang Y-CT; Ghio AJ; Stonehuerner J; McGee J; Carter JD; Grambow SC; Devlin RB. (2003). The role of
soluble components in ambient fine particles-induced changes in human lungs and blood. Inhal Toxicol,
15: 327-342. 087377
Huber SA; Sakkinen P; Conze D; Hardin N; Tracy R. (1999). Interleukin-6 exacerbates early atherosclerosis in
mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vase Biol, 19: 2364-2367. 156575
Hwang J-S; Chan C"C. (2002). Effects of air pollution on daily clinic visits for lower respiratory tract illness. Am
J Epidemiol, 155: M0. 023222
Hwang J-S; Nadziejko C; Chen LC. (2005). Effects of subchronic exposures to concentrated ambient particles
(CAPs) in mice: HI Acute and chronic effects of CAPs on heart rate, heart-rate fluctuation, and body
temperature. Inhal Toxicol, 17: 199-207. 087957
Ibald-Mulli A; Timonen KL; Peters A; Heinrich J; Wolke G; Lanki T; Buzorius G; Kreyling WG; De Hartog J;
Hoek G; Ten Brink HM; Pekkanen J. (2004). Effects of particulate air pollution on blood pressure and
heart rate in subjects with cardiovascular disease: a multicenter approach. Environ Health Perspect,
112: 369-377. 087415
Inoue K; Takano H; Yanagisawa R; Sakurai M; Ichinose T; Sadakane K; Yoshikawa T. (2005). Effects of nano
particles on antigen-related airway inflammation in mice. Respir Res, 16. 088625
Ito K. (2003). Associations of particulate matter components with daily mortality and morbidity in Detroit,
Michigan. 042856
Ito K; Christensen WF; Eatough DJ; Henry RC; Kim E; Laden F; Lall R; Larson TV; Neas L; Hopke PK;
Thurston GD. (2006). PM source apportionment and health effects: 2 An investigation of intermethod
variability in associations between source-apportioned fine particle mass and daily mortality in
Washington, DC. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 16: 300-310. 088391
Ito K; Thurston GD; Silverman RA;. (2007). Association between coarse particles and asthma emergency
department (ED) visits in New York City. 091262
Ito T; Okumura H; Tsukue N; Kobayashi T; Honda K; Sekizawa K. (2006). Effect of diesel exhaust particles on
mRNA expression of viral and bacterial receptors in rat lung epithelial L2 cells. , 165: 66-70. 096648
Ito T; Suzuki T; Tamura K; Nezu T; Honda K; Kobayashi T. (2008). Examination of mRNA expression in rat
hearts and lungs for analysis of effects of exposure to concentrated ambient particles on cardiovascular
function. Toxicol Sci, 243: 271-283. 096823
Jaffe DH; Singer ME; Rimm AA. (2003). Air pollution and emergency department visits for asthma among Ohio
Medicaid recipients, 1991-1996. Environ Res, 91: 21-28. 041957
Jalaludin B; Morgan G; Lincoln D; Sheppeard V; Simpson R; Corbett S. (2006). Associations between ambient
air pollution and daily emergency department attendances for cardiovascular disease in the elderly (65+
years), Sydney, Australia. , 16: 225-37. 189416
Jalaludin BB; O'Toole BI; Leeder SR. (2004). Acute effects of urban ambient air pollution on respiratory
symptoms, asthma medication use, and doctor visits for asthma in a cohort of Australian children.
Environ Res, 95: 32-42. 056595
Jalava PI; Salonen RO; Halinen AL Penttinen P; Pennanen AS; Sillanpaa M; Sandell E; Hillamo R; Hirvonen
M-R. (2006). In vitro inflammatory and cytotoxic effects of size-segregated particulate samples collected
during long-range transport of wildfire smoke to Helsinki. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 215: 341-353. 155872
Jalava PI; Salonen RO; Pennanen AS; Happo MS; Penttinen P; Halinen AL Sillanpaa M; Hillamo R; Hirvonen
MR. (2008). Effects of solubility of urban air fine and coarse particles on cytotoxic and inflammatory
responses in RAW 264.7 macrophage cell line. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 229: 146-60. 098968
Janes H; Sheppard L; Lumley T. (2005). Case-crossover analyses of air pollution exposure data: referent
selection strategies and their implications for bias. , 16: 717-726. 087535
July 2009
6-347
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Jansen KL; Larson TV; Koenig JQ; Mar TF; Fields Ci Stewart J; Lippmann M. (2005). Associations between
health effects and particulate matter and black carbon in subjects with respiratory disease. Environ
Health Perspect, 113: 1741-1746. 082236
Janssen NAH; Schwartz J; Zanobetti A; Suh HH. (2002). Air conditioning and source-specific particles as
modifiers of the effect of PM10 on hospital admissions for heart and lung disease. Environ Health
Perspect, 110: 43-49. 016743
Johnston FH; Bailie RS; Pilotto LS; Hanigan IC. (2007). Ambient biomass smoke and cardio-respiratory hospital
admissions in Darwin, Australia. , T- 240. 155882
Johnston FH; Webby RJ; Pilotto LS; Bailie RS; Parry DL; Halpin SJ. (2006). Vegetation fires, particulate air
pollution and asthma: a panel study in the Australian monsoon tropics. Int J Environ Health Res, 16:
391-404. 091386
Just J; Segala C; Sahraoui F; Priol G; Grimfeld A; Neukirch F. (2002). Short-term health effects of particulate
and photochemical air pollution in asthmatic children. Eur Respir J, 20: 899-906. 035429
Kannel WB; Abbott RD; Savage DD; McNamara PM. (1983). Coronary heart disease and atrial fibrillation: the
Framingham Study. Am Heart J, 106: 389-396. 156623
Katsouyanni K; Touloumi G; Samoli E; Petasakis Y; Analitis A; Le Tertre A; Rossi G; Zmirou D; Ballester F;
Boumghar A; Anderson HR; Wojtyniak B; Paldy A; Braunstein R; Pekkanen J; Schindler C; Schwartz J.
(2003). Sensitivity analysis of various models of short-term effects of ambient particles on total mortality
in 29 cities in APHEA2. 042807
Kelishadi R; Mirghaffari N; Poursafa P; Gidding S. (2009). Lifestyle and environmental factors associated with
inflammation, oxidative stress and insulin resistance in children. Atherosclerosis, 203: 311-319. 191960
Kettunen J; Lanki T; Tiittanen P; Aalto PP; Koskentalo T; Kulmala M; Salomaa V; Pekkanen J. (2007).
Associations of fine and ultrafine particulate air pollution with stroke mortality in an area of low air
pollution levels. Stroke, 38: 918-922. 091242
Kim SY; O'Neill MS; Lee JT; Cho Y; Kim J; Kim H. (2007). Air pollution, socioeconomic position, and emergency
hospital visits for asthma in Seoul, Korea. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 80: 701-710. 092837
Klein-Patel ME; Diamond G; Boniotto M; Saad S; Ryan LK. (2006). Inhibition of beta-defensin gene expression
in airway epithelial cells by low doses of residual oil fly ash is mediated by vanadium. , 92: 115-125.
097092
Kleinman MT; Araujo JA; Nel A; Sioutas C, Campbell A; Cong PQ; Li H; Bondy SC. (2008). Inhaled ultrafine
particulate matter affects CNS inflammatory processes and may act via MAP kinase signaling pathways.
Toxicol Lett, 178: 127-130. 190074
Kleinman MT; Hamade A; Meacher D; Oldham M; Sioutas C; Chakrabarti B; Stram D; Froines JR; Cho AK.
(2005). Inhalation of concentrated ambient particulate matter near a heavily trafficked road stimulates
antigen-induced airway responses in mice. , 55: 1277-88. 189364
Kleinman MT; Sioutas C; Froines JR; Fanning E; Hamade A; Mendez L; Meacher D; Oldham M. (2007).
Inhalation of concentrated ambient particulate matter near a heavily trafficked road stimulates antigen-
induced airway responses in mice. , 19 Suppl l: 117-26. 097082
Klemm RJ; Lipfert FW; Wyzga RE; Gust C. (2004). Daily mortality and air pollution in Atlanta: two years of
data from ARIES. Inhal Toxicol, 16 Suppl l: 131-141. 056585
Klemm RJ; Mason R. (2003). Replication of reanalysis of Harvard Six-City mortality study. 042801
Klemm RJ; Mason RM Jr. (2000). Aerosol Research and Inhalation Epidemiological Study (ARIES): air quality
and daily mortality statistical modeling-"interim results. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 50: 1433-1439.
010389
Knuckles T; Lund A; Lucas S; Campen M. (2008). Diesel exhaust exposure enhances venoconstriction via
uncoupling of eNOS. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 230: 346. 191987
Ko FWS; Tam W', Wong TW; Chan DPS. (2007). Temporal relationship between air pollutants and hospital
admissions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Hong Kong. Thorax, 62: 780-785. 091639
Ko FWS; Tam W; Wong TW; Lai CKW;. (2007). Effects of air pollution on asthma hospitalization rates in
different age groups in Hong Kong. Clin Exp Allergy, 37: 1312-1319. 092844
Kodavanti UP; Schladweiler MC; Ledbetter AD; Hauser R; Christiani DC; McGee J; Richards JR; Costa DL.
(2002). Temporal association between pulmonary and systemic effects of particulate matter in healthy
and cardiovascular compromised rats. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 65: 1545-1569. 025236
Kodavanti UP; Schladweiler MC; Ledbetter AD; McGee JK; Walsh L; Gilmour PS; Highfill JW; Davies D;
Pinkerton KE; Richards JH; Crissman K; Andrews D; Costa DL. (2005). Consistent pulmonary and
systemic responses from inhalation of fine concentrated ambient particles: roles of rat strains used and
physicochemical properties. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 1561-1568. 087946
July 2009
6-348
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Kodavanti UP; Schladweiler MCJ; Ledbetter AD; Hauser R; Christiani DC; Samet JM; McGee J; Richards JH;
Costa DL. (2002). Pulmonary and systemic effects of zinc-containing emission particles in three rat
strains' multiple exposure scenarios. Toxicol Sci, 70- 73"85. 035344
Koenig J; Allen R; Larson T; Liu S. (2005). Response to "Indoor- and Outdoor-Generated Particles and Children
with asthma" [letter]. Environ Health Perspect, 113: A581. 088999
Koenig JQ; Jansen K; Mar TF; Lumley T; Kaufman J; Trenga CA; Sullivan J; Liu LJ; Shapiro GG; Larson TV.
(2003). Measurement of offline exhaled nitric oxide in a study of community exposure to air pollution.
Environ Health Perspect, 111: 1625-1629. 156653
Koenig JQ; Mar TF; Allen RW; Jansen K; Lumley T; Sullivan JH; Trenga CA; Larson T; Liu LJ. (2005).
Pulmonary effects of indoor- and outdoor-generated particles in children with asthma. Environ Health
Perspect, 113: 499-503. 087384
Koken PJM; Piver WT; Ye F; Elixhauser A; Olsen LM; Portier CJ. (2003). Temperature, air pollution, and
hospitalization for cardiovascular diseases among elderly people in Denver. Environ Health Perspect,
111: 1312-1317. 049466
Kongerud J; Madden MC; Hazucha M; Peden D. (2006). Nasal responses in asthmatic and nonasthmatic
subjects following exposure to diesel exhaust particles. Inhal Toxicol, 18: 589-594. 156656
Kooter IM; Boere AJ; Fokkens PH; Leseman DL; Dormans JA; Cassee FR. (2006). Response of spontaneously
hypertensive rats to inhalation of fine and ultrafine particles from traffic: experimental controlled study.
Part Fibre Toxicol, 15: 3-7. 097547
Kuo HW; Lai JS; Lee MC; Tai RC; Lee MC. (2002). Respiratory effects of air pollutants among asthmatics in
central Taiwan. Arch Environ Occup Health, 57: 194-200. 036310
Laden F; Neas LM; Dockery DW; Schwartz J. (2000). Association of fine particulate matter from different
sources with daily mortality in six US cities. Environ Health Perspect, 108: 941-947. 012102
Lagorio S; Forastiere F; Pistelli R; Iavarone I; Michelozzi P; Fano V; Marconi A; Ziemacki G; Ostro BD. (2006).
Air pollution and lung function among susceptible adult subjects: a panel study. , 5: 11. 089800
Lai LW; Cheng WL. (2008). The impact of air quality on respiratory admissions during Asian dust storm
periods. Int J Environ Health Res, 18: 429-450. 180301
Langrish JP; Mills NL; Chan JK; Leseman DL; Aitken RJ; Fokkens PH; Cassee FR; Li J; Donaldson K; Newby
DE; Jiang L. (2009). Beneficial cardiovascular effects of reducing exposure to particulate air pollution
with a simple facemask. Part Fibre Toxicol, 6: 8. 191908
Lanki T; De Hartog JJ; Heinrich J; Hoek G; Janssen NAH; Peters A; Stolzel M; Timonen KL; Vallius M;
Vanninen E; Pekkanen J. (2006). Can we identify sources of fine particles responsible for exercise-
induced ischemia on days with elevated air pollution? The ULTRA study. Environ Health Perspect, 114:
655-660. 088412
Lanki T; Hoek G; Timonen K; Peters A; Tiittanen P; Vanninen E; Pekkanen J. (2008). Hourly variation in fine
particle exposure is associated with transiently increased risk of ST segment depression. Br Med J, 65:
782. 191984
Lanki T; Pekkanen J; Aalto P; Elosua R; Berglind N; D'Ippoliti D; Kulmala M; Nyberg F; Peters A; Picciotto S;
Salomaa V; Sunyer J; Tiittanen P; Von Klot S; Forastiere F; for the HEAPSS Study Group. (2006).
Associations of traffic-related air pollutants with hospitalisation for first acute myocardial infarction: the
HEAPSS study. Occup Environ Med, 63: 844-851. 089788
Larrieu S; Jusot J-F; Blanchard M; Prouvost H; Declercq C; Fabre P; Pascal L; Le Tertre A; Wagner V; Riviere
S; Chardon B; Borelli D; Cassadou S; Eilstein D; Lefranc A. (2007). Short term effects of air pollution on
hospitalizations for cardiovascular diseases in eight French cities: The PSAS program. Sci Total Environ,
387: 105-112. 093031
Larrieu S; Lefranc A; Gault G; Chatignoux E; Couvy F; Jouves B; Filleul L. (2009). Are the Short-term Effects of
Air Pollution Restricted to Cardiorespiratory Diseases?. Am J Epidemiol, 169: 1-8. 180294
Larsson B"M; Sehistedt M; Grunewald J; Skold CM; Lundin A; Blomberg A; Sandstrom T; Eklund A;
Svartengren M. (2007). Road tunnel air pollution induces bronchoalveolar inflammation in healthy
subjects. Eur Respir J, 29: 699-705. 091375
Last JA; Ward R; Temple L; Pinkerton KE; Kenyon NJ. (2004). Ovalbumin "induced airway inflammation and
fibrosis in mice also exposed to ultrafine particles. , 16: 93-102. 097334
Laupacis A; Boysen G; Connolly S. (1994). Risk factors for stroke and efficacy of antithrombotic therapy in atrial
fibrillation: Analysis of pooled data from five randomized controlled trials. , 154: 1449-1457. 190901
Laurent O; Pedrono G; Filleul L; Segala C; Lefranc A; Schillinger C; Riviere E; Bard D. (2009). Influence of
socioeconomic deprivation on the relation between air pollution and beta-agonist sales for asthma. Chest,
135: 717-723. 192129
July 2009
6-349
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Laurent 0> Pedrono G> Segala Ci Filleul L; Havard Si Deguen Si Schillinger Ci Riviere Ei Bard D. (2008). Air
pollution, asthma attacks, and socioeconomic deprivation- a small-area case-crossover study. Am J
Epidemiol, 168: 58-65. 156672
Lay JCi Bennett WD; Kim CS; Devlin RB; Bromberg PA. (1998). Retention and intracellular distribution of
instilled iron oxide particles in human alveolar macrophages. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol, 18: 687-695.
007683
Lay JCi Zeman KL; Ghio AJ; Bennett WD. (2001). Effects of inhaled iron oxide particles on alveolar epithelial
permeability in normal subjects. Inhal Toxicol, 13: 1065-1078. 020613
Le Tertre A; Medina S; Samoli E; Forsberg B; Michelozzi P; Boumghar A; Vonk JM; Bellini A; Atkinson R;
Ayres JG; Sunyer J; Schwartz J; Katsouyanni K. (2002). Short term effects of particulate air pollution on
cardiovascular diseases in eight European cities. J Epidemiol Community Health, 56: 773-779. 023746
Le Tertre A; Medina S; Samoli E; Forsberg B; Michelozzi P; Boumghar A; Vonk JM; Bellini A; Atkinson R;
Ayres JG; Sunyer J; Schwartz J; Katsouyanni K. (2003). Short-term effects of particulate air pollution on
cardiovascular diseases in eight European cities. 042820
Le Tertre A; Schwartz J; Touloumi G. (2005). Empirical Bayes and adjusted estimates approach to estimating
the relation of mortality to eposure of PM10. Risk Anal, 25: 711-718. 087560
Lee J-T; Kim H; Song H; Hong Y-C; Cho Y-S; Shin S-Y; Hyun Y-J; Kim Y-S. (2002). Air pollution and asthma
among children in Seoul, Korea. , 13: 481-484. 034826
Lee J-T; Son J-Y; Cho Y"S. (2007). A comparison of mortality related to urban air particles between periods with
Asian dust days and without Asian dust days in Seoul, Korea, 2000-2004. Environ Res, 105: 409-13.
093042
Lee JT; Kim H; Cho YS; Hong YC; Ha EH; Park H. (2003). Air pollution and hospital admissions for ischemic
heart diseases among individuals 64+ years of age residing in Seoul, Korea. , 58: 617-623. 095552
Lee SL; Wong WHS; Lau YL. (2006). Association between air pollution and asthma admission among children in
Hong Kong. Clin Exp Allergy, 36: 1138-1146. 090176
Lei Y-C; Chan C-C; Wang P-Y; Lee C-T; Cheng T-J. (2004). Effects of Asian dust event particles on
inflammation markers in peripheral blood and bronchoalveolar lavage in pulmonary hypertensive rats.
Environ Res, 95: 71-76. 087884
Lei YC; Chen MC; Chan CC; Wang PY; Lee CT; Cheng TJ. (2004). Effects of concentrated ambient particles on
airway responsiveness and pulmonary inflammation in pulmonary hypertensive rats. Inhal Toxicol, 16:
785-792. 087999
LeVine AM; Gwozdz J; Stark J; Bruno M; Whitsett J; Korfhagen T. (1999). Surfactant protein-A enhances
respiratory syncytial virus clearance in vivo. J Clin Invest, 103: 1015-1021. 156687
LeVine AM; Whitsett JA. (2001). Pulmonary collectins and innate host defense of the lung. , 3: 161-166. 155928
Levy D; Sheppard L; Checkoway H; Kaufman J; Lumley T; Koenig J; Siscovick D. (2001). A case-crossover
analysis of particulate matter air pollution and out-of-hospital primary cardiac arrest. , 12: 193-199.
017171
Lewis CW; Klouda GA; Ellenson WD. (2004). Radiocarbon measurement of the biogenic contribution to
summertime PM-2.5 ambient aerosol in Nashville, TN. Atmos Environ, 38: 6053-6061. 097498
Lewis CW; Norris GA; Conner TL; Henry RC. (2003). Source apportionment of Phoenix PM2.5 aerosol with the
Unmix Receptor model. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 53: 325-338. 088413
Lewis TC; Robins TG; Dvonch JT; Keeler GJ; Yip FY; Mentz GB; Lin X; Parker EA; Israel BA; Gonzalez L; Hill
Y. (2005). Air pollution-associated changes in lung function among asthmatic children in Detroit.
Environ Health Perspect, 113: 1068-1075. 081079
Li N; Wang M; Bramble LA; Schmitz DA; Schauer JJ; Sioutas C; Harkema JR; Nel AE. (2009). The adjuvant
effect of ambient particulate matter is closely reflected by the particulate oxidant potential . Environ
Health Perspect, 117: 1116-1123. 190457
Li Y-J; Kawada T; Matsumoto A; Azuma A; Kudoh S; Takizawa H; Sugawara I. (2007). Airway inflammatory
responses to oxidative stress induced by low-dose diesel exhaust particle exposure differ between mouse
strains. , 33: 227-244. 155929
Liao C-M; Chiang Y-H; Chio C-P. (2009). Assessing the airborne titanium dioxide nanoparticle-related exposure
hazard at workplace. J Hazard Mater, 162: 57"65. 157456
Liao D; Duan Y; Whitsel EA; Zheng Z-J; Heiss G; Chinchilli VM; Lin H-M. (2004). Association of higher levels of
ambient criteria pollutants with impaired cardiac autonomic control: a population-based study. Am J
Epidemiol, 159: 768-777. 056590
Liao D; Heiss G; Chinchilli VM; Duan Y; Folsom AR; Lin HM; Salomaa V. (2005). Association of criteria
pollutants with plasma hemostatic/inflammatory markers: a population-based study. J Expo Sci Environ
Epidemiol, 15: 319-328. 088677
July 2009
6-350
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Liao KJ; Tagaris E; Manomaiphiboon K; Napelenok SL; Woo JH; He S; Amar P; Russell AG. (2007).
Sensitivities of Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter Formation toEmissions under the Impact of Potential
Future Climate Change. Environ Sci Technol, 41- 8355-8361. 180272
Lin M; Chen Y; Burnett RT; Villeneuve PJ; Krewski D. (2002). The influence of ambient coarse particulate
matter on asthma hospitalization in children- case-crossover and time-series analyses. Environ Health
Perspect, 110: 575-581. 026067
Lin M; Stieb DM; Chen Y. (2005). Coarse particulate matter and hospitalization for respiratory infections in
children younger than 15 years in Toronto- a case-crossover analysis. , 116- 235-240. 087828
Linn WS; Szlachcic Y> Gong H Jr', Kinney PL; Berhane KT. (2000). Air pollution and daily hospital admissions
in metropolitan Los Angeles. Environ Health Perspect, 108: 427-434. 002839
Lipfert FW; Baty JD; Miller JP; Wyzga RE. (2006). PM2.5 constituents and related air quality variables as
predictors of survival in a cohort of U.S. military veterans. Inhal Toxicol, 18: 645-657. 088756
Lipfert FW; Morris SC; Wyzga RE. (2000). Daily mortality in the Philadelphia metropolitan area and size-
classified particulate matter. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 50: 1501-1513. 004088
Lippmann M. (2000). Environmental toxicants: human exposures and their health effects. 024579
Lippmann M; Hwang J; Maclejczyk P; Chen L. (2005). PM source apportionment for short-term cardiac function
changes in ApoE-/- mice. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 1575-1579. 087453
Lippmann M; Ito K; Hwang JS; Maciejczyk P; Chen LC. (2006). Cardiovascular effects of nickel in ambient air.
Environ Health Perspect, 114: 1662-9. 091165
Lippmann M; Ito K; Nadas A; Burnett RT. (2000). Association of particulate matter components with daily
mortality and morbidity in urban populations. 011938
Lipsett MJ; Tsai FC; Roger L; Woo M; Ostro BD. (2006). Coarse particles and heart rate variability among older
adults with coronary artery disease in the Coachella Valley, California. Environ Health Perspect, 114:
1215-1220. 088753
Lisabeth LD; Escobar JD; Dvonch JT; Sanchez BN; Majersik JJ; Brown DL; Smith MA; Morgenstern LB.
(2008). Ambient air pollution and risk for ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. , 64: 53"59.
155939
Liu J; Ballaney M; Al-Alem U; Quan C; Jin X; Perera F; Chen LC; Miller RL. (2008). Combined Inhaled Diesel
Exhaust Particles and Allergen Exposure Alter Methylation of T Helper Genes and IgE Production In
Vivo. Toxicol Sci, 102: 76-81. 156709
Liu L; Poon R; Chen L; Frescura AM; Montuschi P; Ciabattoni G; Wheeler A; Dales R. (2009). Acute effects of
air pollution on pulmonary function, airway inflammation, and oxidative stress in asthmatic children.
Environ Health Perspect, 117: 668-674. 192003
Liu L; Ruddy TD; Dalipaj M; Szyszkowicz M; You H; Poon R; Wheeler A; Dales R. (2007). Influence of personal
exposure to particulate air pollution on cardiovascular physiology and biomarkers of inflammation and
oxidative stress in subjects with diabetes. J Occup Environ Med, 49: 258-265. 156705
Liu SX; Hou FF; Guo ZJ; Nagai R; Zhang WR; Liu ZQ; Zhou ZM; Zhou M; Xie D; Wang GB; Zhang X. (2006).
Advanced oxidation protein products accelerate atherosclerosis through promoting oxidative stress and
inflammation. , 26: 1156-1162. 192002
Liu X; Meng Z. (2005). Effects of airborne fine particulate matter on antioxidant capacity and lipid peroxidation
in multiple organs of rats. Inhal Toxicol, 17: 467-473. 088650
Ljungman P; Bellander T; Schneider A; Breitner S; Forastiere F; Hampel R; Illig T; Jacquemin B; Katsouyanni
K; von Klot S. (2009). Modification of the interleukin-6 response to air pollution by interleukin-6 and
fibrinogen polymorphisms. Environ Health Perspect, x: x. 191983
Ljungman PLS; Berglind N> Holmgren C; Gadler F; Edvardsson N; Pershagen G; Rosenqvist M; Sjogren B;
Bellander T. (2008). Rapid effects of air pollution on ventricular arrhythmias. Eur Heart J, 29: 2894"
2901.180266
Llorca J; Salas A; Prieto-Salceda D; Chinchon-Bengoechea V; Delgado-Rodriguez M. (2005). Nitrogen dioxide
increases cardiorespiratory admissions in Torrelavega (Spain). J Environ Health, 68: 30-35. 087825
Lokken PR; Wellenius GA; Coull BA; Burger MR; Schlaug G; Suh HH; Mittleman MA. (2009). Air Pollution and
Risk of Stroke: Underestimation of Effect Due to Misclassification of Time of Event Onset. Epidemiology,
20: 137. 186774
Low RB; Bielory L; Qureshi AI; Dunn V; Stuhlmiller DF; Dickey DA. (2006). The relation of stroke admissions
to recent weather, airborne allergens, air pollution, seasons, upper respiratory infections, and asthma
incidence, September 11, 2001, and day of the week. , 37: 951-957. 090441
Lucking A; Lundback M; Mills N; Faratian D; Barath S; Pourazar J; Cassee F; Donaldson K; Boon N; Badimon
J. (2008). Diesel exhaust inhalation increases thrombus formation in man. Eur Heart J, 29: 3043. 191993
July 2009
6-351
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Luginaah IN; Fung KY; Gorey KM; Webster GJ Wills C. (2005). Association of ambient air pollution with
respiratory hospitalization in a government designated "area of concern"' the case of Windsor, Ontario.
Environ Health Perspect, 113- 290-296. 057327
Lund AE Lucero A; Lucas Si Madden MCi McDonald JDi Seagrave JCi Knuckles TLi Campen MJ. (2009).
Vehicular emissions induce vascular MMP-9 expression and activity associated with endothelial—
mediated pathways. Arterioscler Thromb Vase Biol, 29- 511-517. 180257
Lundback Mi Mills NLi Lucking Ai Barath Si Donaldson Ki Newby DEi Sandstrom Ti Blomberg A. (2009).
Experimental exposure to diesel exhaust increases arterial stiffness in man. Part Fibre Toxicol, 6- 7.
191967
Luttmann-Gibson Hi Suh HHi Coull BAi Dockery DWi Sarnet SEi Schwartz Ji Stone PHi Gold DR. (2006).
Short-term effects of air pollution on heart rate variability in senior adults in Steubenville, Ohio. J Occup
Environ Med, 48: 780-788. 089794
Maciejczyk Pi Chen LC. (2005). Effects of subchronic exposures to concentrated ambient particles (CAPs) in
mice: VIII source-related daily variations in in vitro responses to CAPs. Inhal Toxicol, 17: 243-253.
087456
Mar TFi Ito Ki Koenig JQ; Larson TV; Eatough DJ; Henry RC; Kim E> Laden F; Lall R; Neas Li Stolzel Mi
Paatero Pi Hopke PKi Thurston GD. (2006). PM source apportionment and health effects: 3 Investigation
of inter-method variations in associations between estimated source contributions of PM25 and daily
mortality in Phoenix, AZ. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, Epidemiol.16: 311-320. 086143
Mar TF; Jansen K; Shepherd K; Lumley T; Larson TV; Koenig JQ. (2005). Exhaled nitric oxide in children with
asthma and short-term PM25 exposure in Seattle. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 1791-1794. 088759
Mar TF; Koenig JQ; Jansen K; Sullivan J; Kaufman J; Trenga CA; Siahpush SH; Liu L-JS; Neas L. (2005). Fine
particulate air pollution and cardiorespiratory effects in the elderly. , 16: 681-687. 087566
Mar TF; Larson TV; Stier RA; Claiborn C; Koenig JQ. (2004). An analysis of the association between respiratory
symptoms in subjects with asthma and daily air pollution in Spokane, Washington. Inhal Toxicol, 16:
809-815. 057309
Mar TF; Norris GA; Koenig JQ; Larson TV. (2000). Associations between air pollution and mortality in Phoenix,
1995-1997. Environ Health Perspect, 108: 347-353. 001760
Mar TF; Norris GA; Larson TV; Wilson WE; Koenig JQ. (2003). Air pollution and cardiovascular mortality in
Phoenix, 1995-1997. 042841
Martins LC; Latorre MRDO; Saldiva PHN; Braga ALF. (2002). Air pollution and emergency room visits due to
chronic lower respiratory diseases in the elderly: an ecological time-series study in Sao Paulo, Brazil. J
Occup Environ Med, 44: 622-627. 035059
Masjedi MR; Jamaati HR; Dokouhaki P; Ahmadzadeh Z; Taheri SA; Bigdeli M; Izadi S; Rostamian A; Aagin K;
Ghavam SM. (2003). The effects of air pollution on acute respiratory conditions. Respirology, 8: 213-230.
052100
Matsumoto A; Hiramatsu K; Li Y; Azuma A; Kudoh S; Takizawa H; Sugawara I. (2006). Repeated exposure to
low-dose diesel exhaust after allergen challenge exaggerates asthmatic responses in mice. , 121: 227-235.
098017
McCreanor J; Cullinan P; Nieuwenhuijsen MJ; Stewart-Evans J; Malliarou E; Jarup L; Harrington R;
Svartengren M; Han I"K; Ohman-Strickland P; Chung KF; Zhang J. (2007). Respiratory effects of
exposure to diesel traffic in persons with asthma. , 357: 2348-2358. 092841
McDonald J; Barr E; White R; Kracko D; Chow J; Zielinska B; Grosjean E. (2008). Generation and
characterization of gasoline engine exhaust inhalation exposure atmospheres. Inhal Toxicol, 20: 1157-
1168.191978
McDonald JD; Barr EB; White RE Chow JC; Schauer JJ; Zielinska B; Grosjean E. (2004). Generation and
characterization of four dilutions of diesel engine exhaust for a subchronic inhalation study. Environ Sci
Technol, 38: 2513-2522. 055644
McQueen DS; Donaldson K; Bond SM; McNeilly JD; Newman S; Barton NJ; Duffin R. (2007). Bilateral
vagotomy or atropine pre-treatment reduces experimental diesel-soot induced lung inflammation. Toxicol
Appl Pharmacol, 219: 62-71. 096266
Medina-Ramon M; Zanobetti A; Schwartz J. (2006). The effect of ozone and PM10 on hospital admissions for
pneumonia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a national multicity study. Am J Epidemiol, 163:
579-588. 087721
Metzger KB; Klein M; Flanders WD; Peel JL; Mulholland JA; Langberg JJ; Tolbert PE. (2007). Ambient air
pollution and cardiac arrhythmias in patients with implantable defibrillators. Epidemiology, 18: 585-592.
092856
Metzger KB; Tolbert PE; Klein M; Peel JL; Flanders WD; Todd KH; Mulholland JA; Ryan PB; Frumkin H.
(2004). Ambient air pollution and cardiovascular emergency department visits. , 15: 46"56. 044222
July 2009
6-352
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Michaud J-P; Grove JS; Krupitsky D. (2004). Emergency department visits and "vog"-related air quality in Hilo,
Hawai'i. Environ Res, 95: 11-19. 089900
Middleton N> Yiallouros P; KLeanthous S> Kolokotroni Oi Schwartz J; Dockery DWi Demokritou P; Koutrakis P.
(2008). A 10-year time-series analysis of respiratory and cardiovascular morbidity in Nicosia, Cyprus: the
effect of short-term changes in air pollution and dust storms. , T- 39. 156760
Migliaretti Gi Cadum Ei Migliore Ei Cavallo F. (2005). Traffic air pollution and hospital admission for asthma: a
case-control approach in a Turin (Italy) population. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 78: 164-169. 088689
Migliaretti Gi Cavallo F. (2004). Urban air pollution and asthma in children. Pediatr Pulmonol, 38: 198-203.
087425
Mills NLi Robinson SD; Fokkens PHi Leseman DLi Miller MRi Anderson D> Freney EJ; Heal MR; Donovan RJ;
Blomberg A; Sandstrom T; MacNee W; Boon NA; Donaldson K; Newby DE; Cassee FR. (2008). Exposure
to concentrated ambient particles does not affect vascular function in patients with coronary heart
disease. Environ Health Perspect, 116; 709-715. 156766
Mills NL; Tornqvist H; Robinson SD; Gonzalez M; Darnley K; MacNee W; Boon NA; Donaldson K; Blomberg A;
Sandstrom T; Newby DE. (2005). Diesel exhaust inhalation causes vascular dysfunction and impaired
endogenous fibrinolysis. , 112: 3930-3936. 095757
Mills NL; Tornqvist H; Gonzalez MC; Vink E; Robinson SD; Soderberg S; Boon NA Donaldson K; Sandstrom T;
Blomberg A; Newby DE. (2007). Ischemic and thrombotic effects of dilute diesel-exhaust inhalation in
men with coronary heart disease. , 357: 1075-1082. 091206
Min KB; Min JY; Cho SI; Paek D. (2008). The relationship between air pollutants and heart-rate variability
among community residents in Korea. Inhal Toxicol, 4- 435-444. 191901
Mohr LB; Luo S; Mathias E; Tobing R; Homan S; Sterling D. (2008). Influence of season and temperature on the
relationship of elementalcarbon air pollution to pediatric asthma emergency room visits. J Asthma, 45:
936-943. 180215
Moolgavkar SH. (2000). Air pollution and daily mortality in three US counties. Environ Health Perspect, 108:
777-784. 012054
Moolgavkar SH. (2000). Air pollution and hospital admissions for diseases of the circulatory system in three US
metropolitan areas. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 50: 1199-1206. 010305
Moolgavkar SH. (2003). Air pollution and daily deaths and hospital admissions in Los Angeles and Cook
counties. 042864
Moolgavkar SH. (2003). Air pollution and daily mortality in two US counties: season-specific analyses and
exposure-response relationships. Inhal Toxicol, 15: 877-907. 051316
Moore KJ; Kunjathoor W; Koehn SL; Manning JJ; Tseng AA; Silver JM; McKee M; Freeman MW. (2005). Loss
of receptor-mediated lipid uptake via scavenger receptor A or CD36 pathways does not ameliorate
atherosclerosis in hyperlipidemic mice. J Clin Invest, 115: 2192-2201. 156780
Morishita M; Keeler G; Wagner J; Marsik F; Timm E; Dvonch J; Harkema J. (2004). Pulmonary retention of
particulate matter is associated with airway inflammation in allergic rats exposed to air pollution in
urban Detroit. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 663-674. 087979
Morris RD; Naumova EN. (1998). Carbon monoxide and hospital admissions for congestive heart failure:
evidence of an increased effect at low temperatures. Environ Health Perspect, 106: 649-653. 086857
Morrison D; Skwarski D; Millar AM; Adams W', MacNee W. (1998). A comparison of three methods of measuring
99mTc-DTPA lung clearance and their repeatability. Eur Respir J, 11: 1141-1146. 024924
Mortimer KM; Neas LM; Dockery DW; Redline S; Tager IB. (2002). The effect of air pollution on inner-city
children with asthma. Eur Respir J, 19: 699-705. 030281
Moshammer H; Hutter H"P; Hauck H; Neuberger M. (2006). Low levels of air pollution induce changes of lung
function in a panel of schoolchildren. Eur Respir J, 27: 1138-1143. 090771
Moshammer H; Neuberger M. (2003). The active surface of suspended particles as a predictor of lung function
and pulmonary symptoms in Austrian school children. Atmos Environ, 37: 1737-1744. 041956
Mudway IS; Stenfors N; Duggan ST; Roxborough H; Zielinski H; Marklund SL; Blomberg A; Frew AJ;
Sandstrom T; Kelly FJ. (2004). An in vitro and in vivo investigation of the effects of diesel exhaust on
human airway lining fluid antioxidants. Arch Biochem Biophys, 423: 200-212. 180208
Mudzinski SP; Rudofsky UH; Mitchell DG; Lawrence DA. (1986). Analysis of lead effects on in vivo antibody-
mediated immunity in several mouse strains. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 83: 321-330. 084184
Muggenburg BA; Barr EB; Cheng YS; Seagrave JC; Tilley LP; Mauderly JL. (2000). Effect of inhaled residual
oil fly ash on the electrocardiogram of dogs. Presented at In: Grant, L. D., ed. PM2000: particulate matter
and health. Inhalation Toxicol. 12(suppl. 4): 189-208. 010279
Murata A; Kida K; Hasunuma H; Kanegae H; Ishimaru Y; Motegi T; Yamada K; Yoshioka H; Yamamoto K;
Kudoh S. (2007). Environmental influence on the measurement of exhaled nitric oxide concentration in
school children: special reference to methodology. , 74: 30-36. 156787
July 2009
6-353
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Mutlu GM; Green D; Bellmeyer A; Baker CM; Burgess Z; Rajamannan N; Christman JW; Foiles N; Kamp DW;
Ghio AJ; Chandel NS; Dean DA; Sznajder JI; Budinger GR. (2007). Ambient particulate matter
accelerates coagulation via an IL"6"dependent pathway. , 117- 2952-61. 121441
Menache MG; Miller FJ; Raabe OG. (1995). Particle inhalability curves for humans and small laboratory
animals. Ann Occup Hyg, 39- 317-328. 006533
Nadziejko CJ Fang K; Chen LC; Cohen B; Karpatkin M; Nadas A. (2002). Effect of concentrated ambient
particulate matter on blood coagulation parameters in rats. 050587
Nadziejko Ci Fang K> Nadziejko E> Narciso SP; Zhong Mi Chen LC. (2002). Immediate effects of particulate air
pollutants on heart rate and respiratory rate in hypertensive rats. , 2- 245-252. 087460
Nadziejko Ci Fang Ki Narciso Si Zhong Mi Su WCi Gordon Ti Nadas Ai Chen LC. (2004). Effect of particulate
and gaseous pollutants on spontaneous arrhythmias in aged rats. Inhal Toxicol, 16- 373-380. 055632
Nascimento LFi Pereira LAi Braga ALi Modolo MCi Carvalho JA Jr. (2006). Effects of air pollution on children's
health in a city in southeastern Brazil. Rev Saude Publica, 40: 77-82. 093247
NCHS. (2007). Classification of Diseases, Functioning, and Disability...Monitoring the Nation's Health.
Retrieved , from #http7/www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd9.htm#RTF#. 157194
Neuberger Mi Schimek MGi Horak F Jri Moshammer Hi Kundi Mi Frischer Ti Gomiscek Bi Puxbaum Hi Hauck
Hi AUPHEP-Team. (2004). Acute effects of particulate matter on respiratory diseases, symptoms and
functions: epidemiological results of the Austrian Projects on Health Effects of Particulate Matter
(AUPHEP). Atmos Environ, 38: 3971-3981. 093249
New York State Department of Health. (2006). Study of ambient air contaminants and asthma in New York
City, parts A and B. 090132
Nightingale JAi Maggs Ri Cullinan Pi Donnelly LEi Rogers DFi Kinnersley Ri Chung KFi Barnes PJi Ashmore
Mi Newman-Taylor A. (2000). Airway inflammation after controlled exposure to diesel exhaust
particulates. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 162: 161-166. 011659
Nikolov MCi Coull BAi Catalano PJi Diaz Ei Godleski JJ. (2008). Statistical methods to evaluate health effects
associated with major sources of air pollution: a case-study of breathing patterns during exposure to
concentrated Boston air particles. J Roy Stat Soc C Appl Stat, 57: 357-378. 156808
Nordenhall Ci Pourazar Ji Ledin M"Ci Levin J-Oi Sandstrom Ti Adelroth E. (2001). Diesel exhaust enhances
airway responsiveness in asthmatic subjects. Eur Respir J, 17: 909-915. 025185
Nurkiewicz TRi Porter DWi Barger Mi Castranova Vi Boegehold MA. (2004). Particulate matter exposure
impairs systemic microvascular endothelium-dependent dilation. Environ Health Perspect, 112: 1299"
1306. 087968
Nurkiewicz TRi Porter DWi Barger Mi Millecchia Li Rao KMi Marvar PJi Hubbs AFi Castranova Vi Boegehold
MA. (2006). Systemic microvascular dysfunction and inflammation after pulmonary particulate matter
exposure. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 412-419. 088611
Nurkiewicz TRi Porter DWi Hubbs AFi Cumpston JLi Chen BTi Frazer DGi Castranova V. (2008). Nanoparticle
inhalation augments particle-dependent systemic microvascular dysfunction. Part Fibre Toxicol, 5- 1.
156816
Nurkiewicz TRi Porter DWi Hubbs AFi Stone Si Chen BTi Frazer DGi Boegehold MAi Castranova V. (2009).
Pulmonary nanoparticle exposure disrupts systemic microvascular nitric oxide signaling. , 110: 191-203.
191961
Nygaard UCi Samuelsen Mi Aase Ai Lovik M. (2004). The capacity of particles to increase allergic sensitization
is predicted by particle number and surface area, not by particle mass. Toxicol Sci, 82: 515-524. 058558
O'Connor GTi Neas Li Vaughn Bi Kattan Mi Mitchell Hi Crain EFi Evans R, 3rd; Gruchalla R; Morgan W', Stout
J; Adams GK; Lippmann M. (2008). Acute respiratory health effects of air pollution on children with
asthma in US inner cities. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 121: 1133-1139 e!131. 156818
O'Neill MS; Hajat S; Zanobetti A; Ramirez-Aguilar M; Schwartz J. (2005). Impact of control for air pollution and
respiratory epidemics on the estimated associations of temperature and daily mortality. Int J
Biometeorol, 50: 121-9. 098094
O'Neill MS; Veves A; Sarnat JA; Zanobetti A; Gold DR; Economides PA; Horton ES; Schwartz J. (2007). Air
pollution and inflammation in type 2 diabetes: a mechanism for susceptibility. Occup Environ Med, 64:
373-379. 091362
O'Neill MS; Veves A; Zanobetti A; Sarnat JA; Gold DR; Economides PA; Horton ES; Schwartz J. (2005).
Diabetes enhances vulnerability to particulate air pollution-associated impairment in vascular reactivity
and endothelial function. , 111: 2913-2920. 088423
Odajima H; Yamazaki S; Nitta H. (2008). Decline in peak expiratory flow according to hourly short-term
concentration of particulate matter in asthmatic children. Inhal Toxicol, 20: 1263. 192005
July 2009
6-354
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Oftedal B; Nafstad P; Magnus P; Bjorkly Si Skrondal A. (2003). Traffic related air pollution and acute hospital
admission for respiratory diseases in Drammen, Norway 1995-2000. Eur J Epidemiol, 18- 671-675.
055623
Okin PMi Devereux RB; Howard BVi Fabsitz RR; Lee ETi Welty TK. (2000). Assessment of QT interval and QT
dispersion for prediction of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in American Indians' The Strong
Heart Study. , 101: 61-66. 156002
Ostro B. (1995). Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in two Southern California counties. Environ Res,
70' 98-104. 079197
Ostro Bi Broadwin R; Green Si Feng W"Yi Lipsett M. (2006). Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in nine
California counties: results from CALFINE. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 29"33. 087991
Ostro Bi Feng W"Yi Broadwin Ri Green Si Lipsett M. (2007). The effects of components of fine particulate air
pollution on mortality in California: results from CALFINE. Environ Health Perspect, 115: 13"9. 091354
Ostro Bi Roth Li Malig Bi Marty M. (2009). The effects of fine particle components on respiratory hospital
admissions in children. Environ Health Perspect, 117: 475. 191971
Ostro BDi Broadwin Ri Lipsett MJ. (2003). Coarse particles and daily mortality in Coachella Valley, California.
042824
Ostro BDi Feng WY; Broadwin R; Malig BJ; Green RS; Lipsett MJ. (2008). The impact of components of fine
particulate matter on cardiovascular mortality in susceptible subpopulations. Occup Environ Med, 65:
750-756. 097971
Park SK; O'Neill MS; Vokonas PS; Sparrow D; Schwartz J. (2005). Effects of air pollution on heart rate
variability^ the VA normative aging study. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 304-309. 057331
Park SK; O'Neill MS; Vokonas PS; Sparrow D; Spiro A, 3rd; Tucker KL; Suh H; Hu H; Schwartz J. (2008).
Traffic-related particles are associated with elevated homocysteine: the VA normative aging study. Am J
Respir Crit Care Med, 178: 283-289. 156845
Park SK; O'Neill MS; Vokonas PS; Sparrow D; Wright RO; Coull B; Nie H; Hu H; Schwartz J. (2008). Air
pollution and heart rate variability: effect modification by chronic lead exposure. , 19: 111-120. 093027
Park SK; O'Neill MS; Wright RO; Hu H; Vokonas PS; Sparrow D; Suh H; Schwartz J. (2006). HFE genotype,
particulate air pollution, and heart rate variability A gene-environmental interaction. , 114: 2798-2805.
091245
Peacock JL; Symonds P; Jackson P; Bremner SA; Scarlett JF; Strachan DP; Anderson HR. (2003). Acute effects
of winter air pollution on respiratory function in schoolchildren in southern England. Occup Environ
Med, 60: 82-89. 042026
Peel JL; Metzger KB; Klein M; Flanders WD; Mulholland JA; Tolbert PE. (2007). Ambient air pollution and
cardiovascular emergency department visits in potentially sensitive groups. Am J Epidemiol, 165: 625"
633. 090442
Peel JL; Tolbert PE; Klein M; Metzger KB; Flanders WD; Knox T; Mulholland JA; Ryan PB; Frumkin H. (2005).
Ambient air pollution and respiratory emergency department visits. , 16: 164-174. 056305
Pekkanen J; Peters A; Hoek G; Tiittanen P; Brunekreef B; de Hartog J; Heinrich J; Ibald-Mulli A; Kreyling WG!
Lanki T; Timonen KL; Vanninen E. (2002). Particulate air pollution and risk of ST-segment depression
during repeated submaximal exercise tests among subjects with coronary heart disease: the exposure
and risk assessment for fine and ultrafine particles in ambient air (ULTRA) study. , 106: 933-938. 035050
Peled R; Friger M; Bolotin A; Bibi H; Epstein L; Pilpel D; Scharf S. (2005). Fine particles and meteorological
conditions are associated with lung function in children with asthma living near two power plants. Public
Health, 119: 418-425. 156015
Peng R; Bell M; Geyh A; McDermott A; Zeger S; Samet J; Dominici F. (2009). Emergency admissions for
cardiovascular and respiratory diseases and the chemical composition of fine particle air pollution.
Environ Health Perspect, 117: 957-963. 191998
Peng RD; Chang HH; Bell ML; McDermott A; Zeger SL; Samet JM; Dominici F. (2008). Coarse particulate
matter air pollution and hospital admissions for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases among Medicare
patients. JAMA, 299: 2172-2179. 156850
Peng RD; Dominici F; Pastor-Barriuso R; Zeger SL; Samet JM. (2005). Seasonal analyses of air pollution and
mortality in 100 US cities. Am J Epidemiol, 161: 585-594. 087463
Peng RD;Chang HH;Bell ML;McDermott A;Zeger SL;Samet JM;Dominici F. (2008). Coarse particulate matter
air pollution and hospital admissions for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases among Medicare
patients. , 299: 2172-9. 186787
Pennanen AS; Sillanpaa M; Hillamo R; Quass U; John AC; Branis MJ Hunova I; Meliefste K; Janssen NA;
Koskentalo T; Castano-Vinyals G; Bouso L; Chalbot MC; Kavouras IG; Salonen RO. (2007). Performance
of a high-volume cascade impactor in six European urban environments: mass measurement and
chemical characterization of size-segregated particulate samples. , 374: 297-310. 155357
July 2009
6-355
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Penttinen P; Vallius M> Tiittanen P; Ruuskanen J; Pekkanen J. (2006). Source-specific fine particles in urban
air and respiratory function among adult asthmatics. Inhal Toxicol, 18- 191-198. 087988
Pereira CEL; Heck TG; Saldiva PHN; Rhoden CR. (2007). Ambient particulate air pollution from vehicles
promotes lipid peroxidation and inflammatory responses in rat lung. , 40- 1353-1359. 156019
Peretz A; Kaufman JD; Trenga CA; Allen J; Carlsten C> Aulet MR; Adar SD; Sullivan JH. (2008). Effects of
diesel exhaust inhalation on heart rate variability in human volunteers. Environ Res, 107- 178-184.
156855
Peretz A; Peck EC; Bammler TK; Beyer RP; Sullivan JH; Trenga CA; Srinouanprachnah S; Farin FM; Kaufman
JD. (2007). Diesel exhaust inhalation and assessment of peripheral blood mononuclear cell gene
transcription effects' an exploratory study of healthy human volunteers. Inhal Toxicol, 19- 1107-1119.
156853
Peretz A; Sullivan JH; Leotta DF; Trenga CA; Sands FN; Allen J; Carlsten C; Wilkinson CW; Gill EA; Kaufman
JD. (2008). Diesel exhaust inhalation elicits acute vasoconstriction in vivo. Environ Health Perspect, 116:
937-942. 156854
Perez L; Tobias A; Querol X; Kunzli N; Pey J; Alastuey A; Viana M; Valero N; Gonzalez-Cabre M; Sunyer J.
(2008). Coarse particles from Saharan dust and daily mortality. , 19: 800-807. 156020
Peters A. (2005). Particulate matter and heart disease: evidence from epidemiological studies. Toxicol Appl
Pharmacol, 207: S477-S482. 087759
Peters A; Dockery DW! Muller JE; Mittleman MA. (2001). Increased particulate air pollution and the triggering
of myocardial infarction. , 103: 2810-2815. 016546
Peters A; Greven S; Heid I; Baldari F; Breitner S; Bellander T; Chrysohoou C; Illig T; Jacquemin B; Koenig W.
(2009). Fibrinogen Genes Modify the Fibrinogen Response to Ambient Particulate Matter. Am J Respir
Crit Care Med, 179: 484-491. 191992
Peters A; Liu E; Verrier RL; Schwartz J; Gold DR; Mittleman M; Baliff J; Oh JA; Allen G; Monahan K; Dockery
DW. (2000). Air pollution and incidence of cardiac arrhythmia. , 11: 11-17. 011347
Peters A; Von Klot S; Heier M; Trentinaglia I; Hormann A; Wichmann HE; Lowel H. (2004). Exposure to traffic
and the onset of myocardial infarction. , 351: 1721-1730. 087464
Petrovic S; Urch B; Brook J; Datema J; Purdham J; Liu L; Lukic Z; Zimmerman B; Tofler G; Downar E; Corey
P; Tarlo S; Broder I; Dales R; Silverman F. (2000). Cardiorespiratory effects of concentrated ambient
PM25: a pilot study using controlled human exposures. Inhal Toxicol, l: 173-188. 004638
Piedrahita JA; Zhang SH; Hagaman JR; Oliver PM; Maeda N. (1992). Generation of mice carrying a mutant
apolipoprotein E gene inactivated by gene targeting in embryonic stem cells. Presented at Proceedings of
the National Academy of Science, 5/15/1992. 156868
Pietropaoli AP; Frampton MWi Hyde RW; Morrow PE; Oberdorster G; Cox C; Speers DM; Frasier LM; Chalupa
DC; Huang LS; Utell MJ. (2004). Pulmonary function, diffusing capacity, and inflammation in healthy
and asthmatic subjects exposed to ultrafine particles. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 59"72. 156025
Pinkerton KE; Zhou Y; Teague SV; Peake JL; Walther RC; Kennedy IM; Leppert VJ; Aust AE. (2004). Reduced
lung cell proliferation following short-term exposure to ultrafine soot and iron particles in neonatal rats:
key to impaired lung growth?. Inhal Toxicol, l: 73-81. 087465
Pinkerton KE; Zhou Y; Zhong C; Smith KR; Teague SV; Kennedy IM; Menache MG. (2008). Mechanisms of
particulate matter toxicity in neonatal and young adult rat lungs. Health Effects Institute. Boston, MA.
135. 190471
Pirrone N; Keeler GJ; Warner PO. (1995). Trends of ambient concentrations and deposition fluxes of particulate
trace metals in Detroit from 1982 to 1992. Sci Total Environ, 162: 43-61. 089297
Pope C; Renlund D; Kfoury A; May H; Home B. (2008). Relation of heart failure hospitalization to exposure to
fine particulate air pollution. , 102: 1230-1234. 191969
Pope CA; Hansen ML; Long RW; Nielsen KR; Eatough NL; Wilson WE; Eatough DJ. (2004). Ambient
particulate air pollution, heart rate variability, and blood markers of inflammation in a panel of elderly
subjects. Environ Health Perspect, 112: 339-345. 055238
Pope CA III; Muhlestein JB; May HT; Renlund DG; Anderson JL; Home BD. (2006). Ischemic heart disease
events triggered by short-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. Circulation, 114: 2443-2448.
091246
Pourazar J; Blomberg A; Kelly FJ; Davies DE; Wilson SJ; Holgate ST; Sandstrom T. (2008). Diesel exhaust
increases EGFR and phosphorylated C-terminal Tyr 1173 in the bronchial epithelium. Part Fibre
Toxicol, 5:8. 156884
Pourazar J; Mudway IS; Samet JM; Helleday R; Blomberg A; Wilson SJ; Frew AJ; Kelly FJ; Sandstrom T.
(2005). Diesel exhaust activates redox-sensitive transcription factors and kinases in human airways. Am
J Physiol, 289: L724-L730. 088305
July 2009
6-356
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Power E Balmes J; Solomon C. (2008). Controlled exposure to combined particles and ozone decreases heart
rate variability. J Occup Environ Med, 50: 1253. 191982
Preutthipan A; Udomsubpayakul U> Chaisupamongkollarp Ti Pentamwa P. (2004). Effect of PM10 pollution in
Bangkok on children with and without asthma. Pediatr Pulmonol, 37: 187-192. 055598
Pritchett LC; Cooper JA. (1985). Aerosol Characterization Study of Anchorage, Alaska: Chemical Analysis and
Source Apportionment. 156886
Prystowsky EN; Benson DW Jr', Fuster V; Hart RG; Kay GN; Myerburg RJ; Naccarelli GV; Wyse DG. (1996).
Management of patients with atrial fibrillation. A Statement for Healthcare Professionals. From the
Subcommittee on Electrocardiography and Electrophysiology, American Heart Association. , 93: 1262"
1277. 156031
Raabe OG; Al-Bayati MA; Teague SV; Rasolt A. (1988). Regional deposition of inhaled monodisperse, coarse,
and fine aerosol particles in small laboratory animals. In Inhaled particles VP Proceedings of an
international symposium and workshop on lung dosimetry (pp. 53"63). Cambridge, United Kingdom:
Pergamon Press. 001439
Rabinovitch N; Strand M; Gelfand EW. (2006). Particulate levels are associated with early asthma worsening in
children with persistent disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 173: 1098-1105. 088031
Rabinovitch N; Zhang LN; Murphy JR; Vedal S; Dutton SJ; Gelfand EW. (2004). Effects of wintertime ambient
air pollutants on asthma exacerbations in urban minority children with moderate to severe disease. J
Allergy Clin Immunol, 114: 1131-1137. 096753
Ranzi A; Gambini M; Spattini A; Galassi C; Sesti D; Bedeschi M; Messori A; Baroni A; Cavagni G; Lauriola P.
(2004). Air pollution and respiratory status in asthmatic children: hints for a locally based preventive
strategy AIRE study. Eur J Epidemiol, 19: 567-576. 089500
Reed MD; Barrett EG; Campen MJ; Divine KK; Gigliotti AP; McDonald JD; Seagrave JC; Mauderly JL; Seilkop
SK; Swenberg JA. (2008). Health effects of subchronic inhalation exposure to gasoline engine exhaust.
Inhal Toxicol, 20: 1125-1143. 156903
Reed MD; Campen MJ; Gigliotti AP; Harrod KS; McDonald JD; Seagrave JC; Mauderly JL; Seilkop SK. (2006).
Health effects of subchronic exposure to environmental levels of hardwood smoke. Inhal Toxicol, 18: 523"
539. 156043
Reed MD; Gigliotti AP; McDonald JD; Seagrave JC; Seilkop SK; Mauderly JL. (2004). Health effects of
subchronic exposure to environmental levels of diesel exhaust. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 177-193. 055625
Rhoden CR; Ghelfi E; Gonzalez-Flecha B. (2008). Pulmonary inflammation by ambient air particles is mediated
by superoxide anion. Inhal Toxicol, 20: 11-15. 190475
Rhoden CR; Lawrence J; Godleski JJ; Gonzalez-Flecha B. (2004). N-acetylcysteine prevents lung inflammation
after short-term inhalation exposure to concentrated ambient particles. Toxicol Sci, 79: 296-303. 087969
Rhoden CR; Wellenius GA; Ghelfi E; Lawrence J; Gonzalez-Flecha B. (2005). PM"induced cardiac oxidative
stress and dysfunction are mediated by autonomic stimulation. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1725: 305-313.
087878
Rich DQ; Freudenberger RS; Ohman-Strickland P; Cho Y; Kipen HM. (2008). Right heart pressure increases
after acute increases in ambient particulate concentration. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 1167-1171.
156910
Rich DQ; Kim MH; Turner JR; Mittleman MA; Schwartz J; Catalano PJ; Dockery DW. (2006). Association of
ventricular arrhythmias detected by implantable cardioverter defibrillator and ambient air pollutants in
the St Louis, Missouri metropolitan area. Occup Environ Med, 63: 591-596. 089814
Rich DQ; Mittleman MA; Link MS; Schwartz J; Luttmann-Gibson H; Catalano PJ; Speizer FE; Gold DR;
Dockery DW. (2006). Increased risk of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation episodes associated with acute
increases in ambient air pollution. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 120-123. 088427
Rich DQ; Schwartz J; Mittleman MA; Link M; Luttmann-Gibson H; Catalano PJ; Speizer FE; Dockery DW.
(2005). Association of short-term ambient air pollution concentrations and ventricular arrhythmias. Am J
Epidemiol, 161: 1123-1132. 079620
Rich KE; Petkau J; Vedal S; Brauer M. (2004). A case-crossover analysis of particulate air pollution and cardiac
arrhythmia in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 363-372. 055631
Riediker M; Cascio WE; Griggs TR; Herbst MC; Bromberg PA; Neas L; Williams RW; Devlin RB. (2004).
Particulate matter exposure in cars is associated with cardiovascular effects in healthy young men. Am J
Respir Crit Care Med, 169: 934-940. 056992
Riediker M; Devlin RB; Griggs TR; Herbst MC; Bromberg PA; Williams RW; Cascio WE. (2004). Cardiovascular
effects in patrol officers are associated with fine particulate matter from brake wear and engine
emissions. Part Fibre Toxicol, l: 2. 091261
July 2009
6-357
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Riojas-Rodriguez Hi Escamilla-Cejudo JA; Gonzalez-Hermosillo JA; Tellez-Rojo MM; Vallejo Mi Santos-Burgoa
Ci Rojas-Bracho L. (2006). Personal PM2.5 and CO exposures and heart rate variability in subjects with
known ischemic heart disease in Mexico City. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 16- 131-137. 156913
Rodriguez Ci Tonkin Ri Heyworth J; Kusel Mi De Klerk Ni Sly PDi Franklin Pi Runnion Ti Blockley A; Landau
Li Hinwood AL. (2007). The relationship between outdoor air quality and respiratory symptoms in young
children. Int J Environ Health Res. 092842
Romieu Ii Garcia-Esteban Ri Sunyer Ji Rios Ci Alcaraz-Zubeldia Mi Velasco SRi Holguin F. (2008). The effect of
supplementation with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on markers of oxidative stress in elderly
exposed to PM(2.5). Environ Health Perspect, 116: 1237-1242. 156922
Romieu Ii Tellez-Rojo MMi Lazo Mi Manzano-Patino Cortez-Lugo Mi Julien Pi Belanger MCi Hernandez-Avila
MHolguin F. (2005). Omega-3 fatty acid prevents heart rate variability reductions associated with
particulate matter. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 172: 1534-1540. 086297
Rosenthal FSi Carney JPi Olinger ML. (2008). Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and airborne fine particulate
matter: a case-crossover analysis of emergency medical services data in Indianapolis, Indiana. Environ
Health Perspect, 116: 631-636. 156925
Routledge HCi Manney Si Harrison RMi Ayres JGi Townend JN. (2006). Effect of inhaled sulphur dioxide and
carbon particles on heart rate variability and markers of inflammation and coagulation in human
subjects. Heart, 92: 220-227. 088674
Rowan 3rd WHi Campen MJi Wichers LBi Watkinson WP. (2007). Heart rate variability in rodents: uses and
caveats in toxicological studies. Cardiovasc Toxicol, T- 28-51. 191911
Roy Di Talajic Mi Dubuc Mi Thibault Bi Guerra Pi Macle Li Khairy P. (2009). Atrial fibrillation and congestive
heart failure. Curr Opin Cardiol, 24: 29. 190902
Ruckerl Ri Greven Si Ljungman Pi Aalto Pi Antoniades Ci Bellander Ti Berglind Ni Chrysohoou Ci Forastiere Fi
Jacquemin Bi von Klot Si Koenig Wi Kuchenhoff Hi Lanki Ti Pekkanen Ji Perucci CAi Schneider Ai
Sunyer Ji Peters A. (2007). Air pollution and inflammation (interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, fibrinogen)
in myocardial infarction survivors. Environ Health Perspect, 115: 1072-1080. 156931
Ruckerl Ri Ibald-Mulli Ai Koenig WSchneider Ai Woelke Gi Cyrys Ji Heinrich Ji Marder Vi Frampton Mi
Wichmann HEi Peters A. (2006). Air pollution and markers of inflammation and coagulation in patients
with coronary heart disease. Environ Health Perspect, 173: 432-441. 088754
Rudell Bi Blomberg Ai Helleday Ri Ledin M"Ci Lundback Bi Stjernberg Ni Horstedt Pi Sandstrom T. (1999).
Bronchoalveolar inflammation after exposure to diesel exhaust: comparison between unfiltered and
particle trap filtered exhaust. Occup Environ Med, 56: 527-534. 001964
Rudell Bi Ledin M"Ci Hammarstrom Ui Stjernberg Ni Lundback Bi Sandstrom T. (1996). Effects on symptoms
and lung function in humans experimentally exposed to diesel exhaust. Occup Environ Med, 53: 658-662.
056577
Rundell KWi Caviston R. (2008). Ultrafine and fine particulate matter inhalation decreases exercise
performance in healthy subjects. , 22: 2-5. 191986
Rundell KWi Hoffman JR.; Caviston Ri Bulbulian Ri Hollenbach AM. (2007). Inhalation of ultrafine and fine
particulate matter disrupts systemic vascular function. Inhal Toxicol, 19: 133-140. 156060
Safar Mi Chamiot-Clerc Pi Dagher Gi Renaud JF. (2001). Pulse pressure, endothelium function, and arterial
stiffness in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension, 38: 1416-1421. 156068
Saldiva PHNi Clarke RWi Coull BAi Stearns RCi Lawrence Ji Krishna-Murthy GGi Diaz Ei Koutrakis Pi Suh Hi
Tsuda Ai Godleski JJ. (2002). Lung inflammation induced by concentrated ambient air particles is
related to particle composition. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 165: 1610-1617. 025988
Salvi Si Blomberg Ai Rudell Bi Kelly Fi Sandstrom Ti Holgate STi Frew A. (1999). Acute inflammatory
responses in the airways and peripheral blood after short-term exposure to diesel exhaust in healthy
human volunteers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 159: 702-709. 058637
Samet JMi Dominici Fi Zeger SLi Schwartz Ji Dockery DW. (2000). National morbidity, mortality, and air
pollution study Part I: methods and methodologic issues. 005809
Samet JMi Rappold Ai Graff Di Cascio WEi Berntsen JHi Huang YCi Herbst Mi Bassett Mi Montilla Ti Hazucha
MJi Bromberg PAi Devlin RB. (2009). Concentrated ambient ultrafine particle exposure induces cardiac
changes in young healthy volunteers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 179: 1034-1042. 191913
Samet JMi Zeger SLi Dominici Fi Curriero Fi Coursac Ii Dockery DWi Schwartz Ji Zanobetti A. (2000). The
national morbidity, mortality, and air pollution study Part II: morbidity, mortality, and air pollution in
the United States. 010269
Samoli Ei Analitis Ai Touloumi Gi Schwartz Ji Anderson HRi Sunyer Ji Bisanti Li Zmirou Di Vonk JMi
Pekkanen Ji Goodman Pi Paldy Ai Schindler Ci Katsouyanni K. (2005). Estimating the exposure-
response relationships between particulate matter and mortality within the APHEA multicity project.
Environ Health Perspect, 113: 88-95. 087436
July 2009
6-358
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Samoli E> Peng R; Ramsay Ti Pipikou Mi Touloumi Gi Dominici Fi Burnett Ri Cohen Ai Krewski Di Samet J.
(2008). Acute effects of ambient particulate matter on mortality in Europe and North America- results
from the APHENA study. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 1480. 188455
Santos Ui Terra-Filho Mi Lin C> Pereira Li Vieira Ti Saldiva Pi Braga A. (2008). Cardiac arrhythmia emergency
room visits and environmental air pollution in Sao Paulo, Brazil. J Epidemiol Community Health, 62:
267. 192004
Sarin Si Undem B> Sanico Ai Togias A. (2006). The role of the nervous system in rhinitis. , 118: 999-1016.
191166
Sarnat JAi Marmur A', Klein Mi Kim Ei Russell AG; Sarnat SE; Mulholland JA; Hopke PK; Tolbert PE. (2008).
Fine particle sources and cardiorespiratory morbidity: an application of chemical mass balance and factor
analytical source-apportionment methods. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 459-66. 097972
Sarnat SE; Suh HH; Coull BA; Schwartz J; Stone PH; Gold DR. (2006). Ambient particulate air pollution and
cardiac arrhythmia in a panel of older adults in Steubenville, Ohio. Occup Environ Med, 63: 700-706.
090489
Sauerzapf V; Jones AP; Cross J. (2009). Environmental factors and hospitalisation for chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease in a rural county of England. J Epidemiol Community Health, 63: 324-328. 180082
Schaumann F; Borm PJA; Herbrich A; Knoch J; Pitz M; Schins RPF; Luettig B; Hohlfeld JM; Heinrich J; Krug
N. (2004). Metal-rich ambient particles (particulate matter 25) cause airway inflammation in healthy
subjects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 170: 898-903. 087966
Schildcrout JS; Sheppard L; Lumley T; Slaughter JC; Koenig JQ; Shapiro GG. (2006). Ambient air pollution and
asthma exacerbations in children: an eight-city analysis. Am J Epidemiol, 164: 505-517. 089812
Schins RPF; Lightbody JH; Borm PJA; Shi T; Donaldson K; Stone V. (2004). Inflammatory effects of coarse and
fine particulate matter in relation to chemical and biological constituents. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 195:
1-11. 054173
Schmitz H; Hilgers U; Weidner M. (2000). Assimilation and metabolism of formaldehyde by leaves appear
unlikely to be of value for indoor air purification. New Phytol, 147: 307-315. 015623
Schneider A; Neas L; Herbst M; Case M; Williams R; Cascio W', Hinderliter A; Holguin F; Buse J; Dungan K.
(2008). Endothelial dysfunction: associations with exposure to ambient fine particles in diabetic
individuals. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 1666. 191985
Schreuder AB; Larson TV; Sheppard L; Claiborn CS. (2006). Ambient woodsmoke and associated respiratory
emergency department visits in Spokane, Washington. Int J Occup Environ Health, 12: 147-53. 097959
Schwartz J. (2003). Airborne particles and daily deaths in 10 US cities. 042800
Schwartz J. (2004). Is the association of airborne particles with daily deaths confounded by gaseous air
pollutants? An approach to control by matching. Environ Health Perspect, 112: 557-561. 053506
Schwartz J. (2004). The effects of particulate air pollution on daily deaths: a multi-city case crossover analysis. ,
61: 956-961. 188945
Schwartz J. (2004). The effects of particulate air pollution on daily deaths: a multi-city case crossover analysis.
Occup Environ Med, 61; 956-961. 078998
Schwartz J; Litonjua A; Suh H; Verrier M; Zanobetti A; Syring M; Nearing B; Verrier R; Stone P; MacCallum G;
Speizer FE; Gold DR. (2005). Traffic related pollution and heart rate variability in a panel of elderly
subjects. Thorax, 60: 455-461. 074317
Schwartz J; Marcus A. (1990). Mortality and air pollution in London: a time series analysis. Am J Epidemiol,
131: 185-194. 073222
Schwartz J; Morris R. (1995). Air pollution and hospital admissions for cardiovascular disease in Detroit,
Michigan. Am J Epidemiol, 142: 23-35. 046186
Schwartz J; Neas LM. (2000). Fine particles are more strongly associated than coarse particles with acute
respiratory health effects in schoolchildren. , 11: 6"10. 007625
Schwartz J; Park SK; O'Neill MS; Vokonas PS; Sparrow D; Weiss S; Kelsey K. (2005). Glutathione-S-transferase
Ml, obesity, statins, and autonomic effects of particles: gene-by-drug-by-environment interaction. Am J
Respir Crit Care Med, 172: 1529-1533. 086296
Seagrave J; Campen M; McDonald J; Mauderly J; Rohr A. (2008). Oxidative stress, inflammation, and
pulmonary function assessment in rats exposed to laboratory-generated pollutant mixtures. , 71: 1352.
191990
Seagrave JC; McDonald JD; Bedrick E; Edgerton ES; Gigliotti AP; Jansen JJ; Ke L; Naeher LP; Seilkop SK;
Zheng M; Mauderley JL. (2006). Lung toxicity of ambient particulate matter from southeastern US sites
with different contributing sources: relationships between composition and effects. Environ Health
Perspect, 114: 1387-93. 091291
Segala C; Poizeau D; Neukirch F; Aubier M; Samson J; Gehanno P. (2004). Air pollution, passive smoking, and
respiratory symptoms in adults. Arch Environ Occup Health, 59: 669-676. 090449
July 2009
6-359
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Shah AP; Pietropaoli AP; Frasier LM; Speers DM; Chalupa DC; Delehanty JM; Huang LS; Utell MJ; Frampton
MW. (2008). Effect of inhaled carbon ultrafine particles on reactive hyperemia in healthy human
subjects. Environ Health Perspect, 116- 375-380. 156970
Sheppard L. (2003). Ambient air pollution and nonelderly asthma hospital admissions in Seattle, Washington,
1987-1994. 042826
Sheppard L; Levy D; Norris G; Larson TV; Koenig JQ. (1999). Effects of ambient air pollution on nonelderly
asthma hospital admissions in Seattle, Washington, 1987-1994. , 10- 23-30. 086921
Shi JP; Harrison RM; Evans D. (2001). Comparison of ambient particle surface area measurement by
epiphaniometer and SMPS/APS. Atmos Environ, 35- 6193-6200. 078292
Sillanpaa M; Frey A; Hillamo R; Pennanen AS; Salonen RO. (2005). Organic, elemental and inorganic carbon in
particulate matter of six urban environments in Europe. , 5- 2869-2879. 156980
Simpson R; Williams G; Petroeschevsky A; Best T; Morgan G; Denison L; Hinwood A; Neville G. (2005). The
short-term effects of air pollution on hospital admissions in four Australian cities. Aust N Z J Public
Health, 29: 213-221. 087438
Sinclair AH; Tolsma D. (2004). Associations and lags between air pollution and acute respiratory visits in an
ambulatory care setting: 25-month results from the aerosol research and inhalation epidemiological
study. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 54: 1212-1218. 088696
Sirivelu MP; MohanKumar SMJ; Wagner JG; Harkema JR; MohanKumar PS. (2006). Activation of the stress
axis and neurochemical alterations in specific brain areas by concentrated ambient particle exposure
with concomitant allergic airway disease. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 870-874. 111151
Slaughter JC; Kim E; Sheppard L; Sullivan JH; Larson TV; Claiborn C. (2005). Association between particulate
matter and emergency room visits, hospital admissions and mortality in Spokane, Washington. J Expo
Sci Environ Epidemiol, 15: 153-159. 073854
Slaughter JC; Lumley T; Sheppard L; Koenig JQ; Shapiro GG. (2003). Effects of ambient air pollution on
symptom severity and medication use in children with asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 91: 346"
353. 086294
Smith AD; Taylor DR. (2005). Is exhaled nitric oxide measurement a useful clinical test in asthma?. Curr Opin
Allergy Clin Immunol, 5: 49-56. 192176
Smith KR; Kim S; Recendez JJ; Teague SV; Menache MG! Grubbs DE; Sioutas C; Pinkerton KE. (2003).
Airborne particles of the California Central Valley alter the lungs of healthy adult rats. Environ Health
Perspect, 111: 902-908. 042107
Smith KR; Veranth JM; Kodavanti UP; Aust AE; Pinkerton KE. (2006). Acute pulmonary and systemic effects of
inhaled coal fly ash in rats: comparison to ambient environmental particles. , 93: 390-9. 110864
Steerenberg P; Withagen C; Dalen W', Dormans J; Loveren H. (2004). Adjuvant Activity of Ambient Particulate
Matter in Macrophage Activity-Suppressed, N"Acetylcysteine-Treated, iNOS" and IL"4"Deficient Mice.
Inhal Toxicol, 16: 835-843. 087981
Steerenberg PA; Van Amelsvoort L; Lovik M; Hetland RB; Alberg T; Halatek T; Bloemen HJT; Rydzynski K;
Swaen G; Schwarze P; Dybing E; Cassee FR. (2006). Relation between sources of particulate air pollution
and biological effect parameters in samples from four European cities: an exploratory study. Inhal
Toxicol, 18: 333-346. 088249
Steerenberg PA; Withagen CE; van Dalen WJ; Dormans JA; Heisterkamp SH; van Loveren H; Cassee FR.
(2005). Dose dependency of adjuvant activity of particulate matter from five European sites in three
seasons in an ovalbumin-mouse model. Inhal Toxicol, 17: 133-145. 088649
Steerenberg PA; Withagen CET; van Dalen WJ; Dormans JAMA; Cassee FR; Heisterkamp SH; van Loveren H.
(2004). Adjuvant activity of ambient particulate matter of different sites, sizes, and seasons in a
respiratory allergy mouse model. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 200: 186-200. 096024
Steinvil A; Kordova-Biezuner L; Shapira I; Berliner S; Rogowski O. (2008). Short-term exposure to air pollution
and inflammation-sensitive biomarkers. , 106: 51-61. 188893
Stenfors N; Nordenhall C; Salvi SS; Mudway I; Soderberg M; Blomberg A; Helleday R; Levin JO; Holgate ST;
Kelly FJ; Frew AJ; Sandstrom T. (2004). Different airway inflammatory responses in asthmatic and
healthy humans exposed to diesel. Eur Respir J, 23: 82"86. 157009
Stevens T; Krantz QT; Linak WP; Hester S; Gilmour MI. (2008). Increased transcription of immune and
metabolic pathways in naive and allergic mice exposed to diesel exhaust. Toxicol Sci, 102: 359-370.
157010
Stolzel M; Peters A; Wichmann H"E. (2003). Daily mortality and fine and ultrafine particles in Erfurt,
Germany. 042842
Strand M; Vedal S; Rodes C', Dutton SJ; Gelfand EW! Rabinovitch N. (2006). Estimating effects of ambient
PM2.5 exposure on health using PM2.5 component measurements and regression calibration (vol 16, pg
30, 2006). J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 16: 471-471. 157017
July 2009
6-360
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Stolzel Mi Breitner Si Cyrys Ji Pitz Mi Wolke Gi Kreyling Wi Heinrich Ji Wichmann H"Ei Peters A. (2007).
Daily mortality and particulate matter in different size classes in Erfurt, Germany. J Expo Sci Environ
Epidemiol, 17: 458-467. 091374
Suglia SFi Gryparis A; Wright RCK Schwartz Ji Wright RJ. (2008). Association of black carbon with cognition
among children in a prospective birth cohort study. Am J Epidemiol, 167: 280-286. 157027
Sullivan Ji Ishikawa Ni Sheppard Li Siscovick Di Checkoway Hi Kaufman J. (2003). Exposure to ambient fine
particulate matter and primary cardiac arrest among persons with and without clinically recognized
heart disease. Am J Epidemiol, 157: 501-509. 043156
Sullivan Ji Sheppard Li Schreuder Ai Ishikawa Ni Siscovick Di Kaufman J. (2005). Relation between short-term
fine-particulate matter exposure and onset of myocardial infarction. , 16: 41-48. 050854
Sullivan JHi Hubbard Ri Liu SLi Shepherd Ki Trenga CAi Koenig JQi Chandler WLi Kaufman JD. (2007). A
community study of the effect of particulate matter on blood measures of inflammation and thrombosis in
an elderly population. Environ Health Perspect, 6: 3. 100083
Sullivan JHi Schreuder ABi Trenga CAi Liu SLi Larson TV; Koenig JQi Kaufman JD. (2005). Association
between short term exposure to fine particulate matter and heart rate variability in older subjects with
and without heart disease. Thorax, 60: 462"6. 109418
Sureshkumar V; Paul Bi Uthirappan Mi Pandey R; Sahu APi Lai K> Prasad AKi Srivastava Si Saxena Ai
Mathur Ni Gupta YK. (2005). Proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokine balance in gasoline
exhaust induced pulmonary injury in mice. Inhal Toxicol, 17: 161-168. 088306
Symons JMi Wang Li Guallar E> Howell E> Dominici F> Schwab Mi Ange BAi Samet Ji Ondov Ji Harrison D>
Geyh A. (2006). A case-crossover study of fine particulate matter air pollution and onset of congestive
heart failure symptom exacerbation leading to hospitalization. Am J Epidemiol, 164: 421-33. 091258
Szyszkowicz M. (2008). Ambient air pollution and daily emergency department visits for ischemic stroke in
Edmonton, Canada. Int J Occup Med Environ Health, 21: 295-300. 192128
Szyszkowicz M. (2009). Air pollution and ED visits for chest pain. Am J Emerg Med, 27: 165-168. 191996
Sorensen Mi Daneshvar Bi Hansen Mi Dragsted LOi Hertel O; Knudsen L; Loft S. (2003). Personal PM2.5
exposure and markers of oxidative stress in blood. Environ Health Perspect, 111: 161-166. 157000
Tamagawa Ei Bai N> Morimoto K> Gray Ci Mui T> Yatera K; Zhang X; Xing L> Li Y> Laher I. (2008). Particulate
matter exposure induces persistent lung inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. , 295: L79. 191988
Tan WC; Qiu D; Liam BL; Ng TP; Lee SH; Van Eeden SF; D'Yachkova Y; Hogg JC. (2000). The human bone
marrow response to acute air pollution caused by forest fires. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 161: 1213-
1217. 002304
Tankersley CG; Bierman A; Rabold R. (2007). Variation in heart rate regulation and the effects of particle
exposure in inbred mice. , 19: 621-9. 097910
Tankersley CG; Campen M; Bierman A; Flanders SE; Broman KW; Rabold R. (2004). Particle effects on heart-
rate regulation in senescent mice. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 381-390. 094378
Tankersley CG; Champion HC; Takimoto E; Gabrielson K; Bedja D; Misra V; El-Haddad H; Rabold R; Mitzner
W. (2008). Exposure to inhaled particulate matter impairs cardiac function in senescent mice. Am J
Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol, 295: R252-263. 157043
Tankersley CG; Irizarry R; Flanders SE; Rabold R; Frank R. (2003). Unstable heart rate and temperature
regulation predict mortality in AKR/J mice. Am J Physiol, 284: R742-R750. 053919
Tecer LH; Alagha O; Karaca F; Tuncel G; Eldes N. (2008). Particulate Matter (PM2.5, PM10-2.5, and PM10) and
Children's Hospital Admissions for Asthma and Respiratory Diseases: A Bidirectional Case-Crossover
Study. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 71: 512-520. 180030
TFESC. (1996). Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use.
Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology. North American Society of Pacing and
Electrophysiology. Eur Heart J, 17: 354-381. 003061
Thurston G; Ito K; Mar T; Christensen WF; Eatough DJ; Henry RC; Kim E; Laden F; Lall R; Larson TV; Liu H;
Neas L; Pinto J; Stolzel M; Suh H; Hopke PK. (2005). Results and implications of the workshop on the
source apportionment of PM health effects. , 16: S134-S135. 097949
Thurston GD; Ito K; Hayes CG; Bates DV; Lippmann M. (1994). Respiratory hospital admissions and
summertime haze air pollution in Toronto, Ontario: consideration of the role of acid aerosols. Environ
Res, 65: 271-290. 043921
Timonen KL; Hoek G; Heinrich J; Bernard A; Brunekreef B; De Hartog J; Hameri K; Ibald-Mulli A; Mirme A;
Peters A; Tiittanen P; Kreyling WG; Pekkanen J. (2004). Daily variation in fine and ultrafine particulate
air pollution and urinary concentrations of lung Clara cell protein CC16. Occup Environ Med, 61: 908"
914. 087915
July 2009
6-361
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Timonen KL; Vanninen Ei De Hartog J; Ibald-Mulli A; Brunekreef B; Gold DR; Henrich J; Hoek G> Lanki T>
Peters A; Tarkiainen Ti Tiittanen P; Kreyling Wi Pekkanen J. (2006). Effects of ultrafine and fine
particulate and gaseous air pollution on cardiac autonomic control in subjects with coronary artery
disease- the ULTRA study. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 16- 332-341. 088747
Tolbert PE; Klein M; Metzger KB; Peel J; Flanders WD; Todd K; Mulholland JA; Ryan PB; Frumkin H. (2000).
Interim results of the study of particulates and health in Atlanta (SOPHIA). J Expo Sci Environ
Epidemiol, 10: 446-460. 010320
Tolbert PE; KLeina MJ Peelb JL; Sarnata SE; Sarnata JA. (2007). Multipollutant modeling issues in a study of
ambient air quality and emergency department visits in Atlanta. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 24: 938"
945. 090316
Tornqvist H; Mills NL; Gonzalez M; Miller MR; Robinson SD; Megson IL; MacNee W; Donaldson K; Soderberg
S; Newby DE; Sandstrom T; Blomberg A. (2007). Persistent endothelial dysfunction in humans after
diesel exhaust inhalation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 176: 395-400. 091279
Trenga CA; Sullivan JH; Schildcrout JS; Shepherd KP; Shapiro GG; Liu LJ; Kaufman JD; Koenig JQ. (2006).
Effect of particulate air pollution on lung function in adult and pediatric subjects in a Seattle panel
study. , 129: 1614-22. 155209
Tsai FC; Apte MG; Daisey JM. (2000). An exploratory analysis of the relationship between mortality and the
chemical composition of airborne particulate matter. Inhal Toxicol, 12: 121-135. 006251
Tsai S-S; Cheng M"H; Chiu H-F; Wu T-N; Yang C-Y. (2006). Air pollution and hospital admissions for asthma in
a tropical city: Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Inhal Toxicol, 18: 549-554. 089768
Tsai S-S; Goggins WB; Chiu H"F; Yang C"Y. (2003). Evidence for an association between air pollution and daily
stroke admissions in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. , 34: 2612-2616. 080133
Tunnicliffe WS; Harrison RM; Kelly FJ; Dunster C; Ayres JG. (2003). The effect of sulphurous air pollutant
exposures on symptoms, lung function, exhaled nitric oxide, and nasal epithelial lining fluid antioxidant
concentrations in normal and asthmatic adults. Occup Environ Med, 60. 088744
U.S. EPA. (1982). Air quality criteria for particulate matter and sulfur oxides. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency. Washington, D.C.. 017610
U.S. EPA. (1996). Air quality criteria for particulate matter. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Research
Triangle Park, NC. EPA/600/P-95/001aF-cF. 079380
U.S. EPA. (2002). Health assessment document for diesel engine exhaust. 042866
U.S. EPA. (2004). Air quality criteria for particulate matter. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Research
Triangle Park, NC. EPA/600/P"99/002aF"bF. 056905
Ulirsch GV; Ball LM; Kaye W; Shy CM; Lee CV; Crawford-Brown D; Symons M; Holloway T. (2007). Effect of
particulate matter air pollution on hospital admissions and medical visits for lung and heart disease in
two southeast Idaho cities. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 17: 478-487. 091332
Upadhyay D; Panduri V; Ghio A; Kamp DW. (2003). Particulate matter induces alveolar epithelial cell DNA
damage and apoptosis: role of free radicals and the mitochondria. , 29: 180-187. 097370
Upadhyay S; Stoeger T; Harder V; Thomas RF; Schladweiler MC; Semmler-Behnke M; Takenaka S; Karg E;
Reitmeir P; Bader M; Stampfl A; Kodovanti U; Schulz H. (2008). Exposure to ultrafine carbon particles at
levels below detectablepulmonary inflammation affects cardiovascular performance inspontaneously
hypertensive rats. Part Fibre Toxicol, 5- 19. 159345
Urch B; Brook JR.; Wasserstein D; Brook RD; Rajagopalan S; Corey P; Silverman F. (2004). Relative
contributions of PM2.5 chemical constituents to acute arterial vasoconstriction in humans. Inhal Toxicol,
16: 345-352. 055629
Urch B; Silverman F; Corey P; Brook JR; Lukic KZ; Rajagopalan S; Brook RD. (2005). Acute blood pressure
responses in healthy adults during controlled air pollution exposures. Environ Health Perspect, 113:
1052-1055. 081080
Van der Werf GR; Randerson JT; Collatz J; Giglio L. (2003). Carbon emissions from fires in tropical and
subtropical ecosystems. , 9: 547-562. 089398
Vedal S; Rich K; Brauer M; White R; Petkau J. (2004). Air pollution and cardiac arrhythmias in patients with
implantable cardiovascular defibrillators. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 353-362. 055630
Vegni FE; Ros O. (2004). Hospital accident and emergency burden is unaffected by today's air pollution levels.
Eur J Emerg Med, 11: 86-88. 087448
Veranth JM; Moss TA; Chow JC; Labban R; Nichols WK Walton JC; Walton JG; Yost GS. (2006). Correlation of
in vitro cytokine responses with the chemical composition of soil-derived particulate matter. Environ
Health Perspect, 114: 341-349. 087479
Veronesi B; Makwana O; Pooler M; Chen LC. (2005). Effects of subchronic exposures to concentrated ambient
particles VII Degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in Apo E7- mice. Inhal Toxicol, 17: 235-241. 087481
July 2009
6-362
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Vigotti MA; Chiaverini F> Biagiola P; Rossi G. (2007). Urban air pollution and emergency visits for respiratory
complaints in Pisa, Italy. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 70- 266-269. 090711
Villeneuve PJ; Burnett RT; Shi Y> Krewski D; Goldberg MS; Hertzman C; Chen Y; Brook J. (2003). A time-
series study of air pollution, socioeconomic status, and mortality in Vancouver, Canada. J Expo Sci
Environ Epidemiol, 13: 427-435. 055051
Villeneuve PJ; Chen L; Stieb D; Rowe BH. (2006). Associations between outdoor air pollution and emergency
department visits for stroke in Edmonton, Canada. Eur J Epidemiol, 21; 689-700. 090191
Vincent R; Kumarathasan P; Goegan P; Bjarnason SG; Guenette J; Berube D; Adamson IY; Desjardins S;
Burnett RT; Miller FJ; Battistini B. (2001). Inhalation toxicology of urban ambient particulate matter:
acute cardiovascular effect in rats. 021184
Von KLot S; Peters A; Aalto P; Bellander T; Berglind N; D'Ippoliti D; Elosua R; Hormann A; Kulmala M; Lanki
T; Lowel H; Pekkanen J; Picciotto S; Sunyer J; Forastiere F; Health Effects of Particles on Susceptible
Subpopulations (HEAPSS) Study Group. (2005). Ambient air pollution is associated with increased risk
of hospital cardiac readmissions of myocardial infarction survivors in five European cities. Circulation,
112: 3073-3079. 088070
Von Klot S; Wolke G; Tuch T; Heinrich J; Dockery DW; Schwartz J; Kreyling WG; Wichmann HE; Peters A.
(2002). Increased asthma medication use in association with ambient fine and ultrafine particles. Eur
Respir J, 20: 691-702. 034706
Ward DJ; Roberts KT; Jones N; Harrison RM; Ayres JG; Hussain S; Walters S. (2002). Effects of daily variation
in outdoor particulates and ambient acid species in normal and asthmatic children. Thorax, 57: 489-502.
025839
Ward PA. (2003). Acute lung injury: how the lung inflammatory response works. Eur Respir J, 44: 22s-23s.
157111
Wegesser TC; Last JA. (2008). Lung response to coarse PM: bioassay in mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 230: 159-
166. 190506
Welin L; Eriksson H; Larsson B; Svardsudd K; Wilhelmsen L; Tibblin G. (1993). Risk Factors for Coronary
Heart Disease during 25 Years of Follow-Up. Cardiology, 82: 223-228. 156151
Wellenius GA; Batalha JRF; Diaz EA; Lawrence J; Coull BA; Katz T; Verrier RL; Godleski JJ. (2004). Cardiac
effects of carbon monoxide and ambient particles in a rat model of myocardial infarction. Toxicol Sci, 80:
367-376. 087874
Wellenius GA; Bateson TF; Mittleman MA; Schwartz J. (2005). Particulate air pollution and the rate of
hospitalization for congestive heart failure among medicare beneficiaries in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Am J Epidemiol, 161: 1030-1036. 087483
Wellenius GA; Coull BA; Batalha JRF; Diaz EA; Lawrence J; Godleski JJ. (2006). Effects of ambient particles
and carbon monoxide on supraventricular arrhythmias in a rat model of myocardial infarction. Inhal
Toxicol, 18: 1077-1082. 156152
Wellenius GA; Coull BA; Godleski JJ; Koutrakis P; Okabe K; Savage ST. (2003). Inhalation of concentrated
ambient air particles exacerbates myocardial ischemia in conscious dogs. Environ Health Perspect, 111:
402-408. 055691
Wellenius GA; Saldiva PHN; Batalha JRF; Murthy GGK; Coull BA; Verrier RL; Godleski JJ. (2002).
Electrocardiographic changes during exposure to residual oil fly ash (ROFA) particles in a rat model of
myocardial infarction. Toxicol Sci, 66: 327-335. 025405
Wellenius GA; Schwartz J; Mittleman MA. (2005). Air pollution and hospital admissions for ischemic and
hemorrhagic stroke among medicare beneficiaries. , 36: 2549-2553. 088685
Wellenius GA; Schwartz J; Mittleman MA. (2006). Particulate air pollution and hospital admissions for
congestive heart failure in seven United States cities. Am J Cardiol, 97: 404-408. 088748
Wellenius GA; Yeh GY; Coull BA; Suh HH; Phillips RS; Mittleman MA. (2007). Effects of ambient air pollution
on functional status in patients with chronic congestive heart failure: a repeated-measures study. , 6: 26.
092830
Welty LJ; Zeger SL. (2005). Are the acute effects of particulate matter on mortality in the National Morbidity,
Mortality, and Air Pollution study the result of inadequate control for weather and season? A sensitivity
analysis using flexible distributed lag models. Am J Epidemiol, 162: 80-88. 087484
Wheeler A; Zanobetti A; Gold DR; Schwartz J; Stone P; Suh HH. (2006). The relationship between ambient air
pollution and heart rate variability differs for individuals with heart and pulmonary disease. Environ
Health Perspect, 114: 560-566. 088453
Whitekus MJ; Li N> Zhang M; Wang M; Horwitz MA; Nelson SK; Horwitz LD; Brechun N; Diaz-Sanchez D; Nel
AE. (2002). Thiol antioxidants inhibit the adjuvant effects of aerosolized diesel exhaust particles in a
murine model for ovalbumin sensitization. , 168: 2560-2567. 157142
July 2009
6-363
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Whitsel E; Quibrera P; Christ S; Liao D; Prineas R; Anderson G; Heiss G. (2009). Heart rate variability,
ambient particulate matter air pollution, and glucose homeostasis' the environmental epidemiology of
arrhythmogenesis in the Women's Health Initiative. Am J Epidemiol, x- x. 191980
Wichmann H"E; Spix C; Tuch T; Wolke G; Peters A; Heinrich J; Kreyling WG; Heyder J. (2000). Daily mortality
and fine and ultrafine particles in Erfurt, Germany Part I- role of particle number and particle mass.
013912
Widdicombe J. (2006). Reflexes from the lungs and airways' historical perspective. J Appl Physiol, 101' 628.
155519
Widdicombe J; Lee L"Y. (2001). Airway reflexes, autonomic function, and cardiovascular responses. Environ
Health Perspect, 4- 579-584. 019049
Widdicombe JG. (2003). Overview of neural pathways in allergy and asthma. Pulm Pharmacol Ther, 16' 23-30.
157145
Wilson WE; Mar TF; Koenig JQ. (2007). Influence of exposure error and effect modification by socioeconomic
status on the association of acute cardiovascular mortality with particulate matter in Phoenix. J Expo Sci
Environ Epidemiol, 17: Sll. 157149
Win-Shwe TT; Yamamoto S; Fujitani Y> Hirano S; Fujimaki H. (2008). Spatial learning and memory function-
related gene expression in thehippocampus of mouse exposed to nanoparticle-rich diesel exhaust.
Neurotoxicology, 29: 940-947. 190516
Witten ML; Wong SS ; Sun NN; Keith I; Kweon C; Foster DE; Schauer JJ; Sherrill DL. (2005). Neurogenic
responses in rat lungs after nose-only exposure to diesel exhaust. 087485
Wong OM; Atkinson RW! Anderson HR; Hedley AJ; Ma S; Chau PY-K; Lam T"H. (2002). A tale of two cities:
effects of air pollution on hospital admissions in Hong Kong and London compared. Environ Health
Perspect, 110: 67-77. 023232
Wong SS; Sun NN; Keith I; Kweon C"B; Foster DE; Schauer James J; Witten ML. (2003). Tachykinin substance
P signaling involved in diesel exhaust-induced bronchopulmonary neurogenic inflammation in rats. , 77:
638-650. 097707
Wong TW; Lau TS; Yu TS; Neller A; Wong SL; Tam W', Pang SW. (1999). Air pollution and hospital admissions
for respiratory and cardiovascular diseases in Hong Kong. Occup Environ Med, 56: 679-683. 009172
Wong TW; Tam WS; Yu TS; Wong AHS. (2002). Associations between daily mortalities from respiratory and
cardiovascular diseases and air pollution in Hong Kong, China. Occup Environ Med, 59: 30-35. 025436
Wordley J; Walters S; Ayres JG. (1997). Short term variations in hospital admissions and mortality and
particulate air pollution. Occup Environ Med, 54: 108-116. 082745
Wu J; M Winer A; J Delfino R. (2006). Exposure assessment of particulate matter air pollution before, during,
and after the 2003 Southern California wildfires. Atmos Environ, 40: 3333-3348. 157156
Yan YH; Huang CH; Chen WJ; Wu MF; Cheng TJ. (2008). Effects of diesel exhaust particles on left ventricular
function in isoproterenol-induced myocardial injury and healthy rats. Inhal Toxicol, 20: 199-203. 098625
Yang C-Y; Chang C"C; Chuang H"Y; Tsai S"S; Wu T"N; Ho C"K. (2004). Relationship between air pollution and
daily mortality in a subtropical city: Taipei, Taiwan. Environ Int, 30: 519-523. 055603
Yang CY. (2008). Air pollution and hospital admissions for congestive heart failure in a subtropical city: Taipei,
Taiwan. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 71: 1085-1090. 157160
Yang CY; Chen CJ. (2007). Air pollution and hospital admissions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a
subtropical city: Taipei, Taiwan. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 70: 1214-9. 092847
Yang CY; Cheng MH; Chen CC. (2009). Effects of Asian Dust Storm Events on Hospital Admissions for
Congestive Heart Failure in Taipei, Taiwan. , 72: 324-328. 190341
Yang Q; Chen Y; Krewski D; Shi Y; Burnett RT; McGrail KM. (2004). Association between particulate air
pollution and first hospital admission for childhood respiratory illness in Vancouver, Canada. Arch
Environ Occup Health, 59: 14-21. 087488
Yeatts K; Svendsen E; Creason J; Alexis N; Herbst M; Scott J; Kupper L; Williams R; Neas L; Cascio W', Devlin
RB; Peden DB. (2007). Coarse particulate matter (PM25-10) affects heart rate variability, blood lipids,
and circulating eosinophils in adults with asthma. Environ Health Perspect, 115: 709-714. 091266
Yokota S; Seki T; Naito Y; Tachibana S; Hirabayashi N; Nakasaka T; Ohara N; Kobayashi H. (2008). Tracheal
instillation of diesel exhaust particles component causes blood and pulmonary neutrophilia and enhances
myocardial oxidative stress in mice. J Toxicol Sci, 33: 609-620. 190109
Yu O; Sheppard L; Lumley T; Koenig JQ; S. (2000). Effects of ambient air pollution on symptoms of asthma in
Seattle-area children enrolled in the CAMP study. Environ Health Perspect, 108: 1209-1214. 013254
Yue W; Schneider A; Stolzel M; Ruckerl R; Cyrys J; Pan X; Zareba W; Koenig W; Wichmann HE; Peters A.
(2007). Ambient source-specific particles are associated with prolonged repolarization and increased
levels of inflammation in male coronary artery disease patients. , 621: 50-60. 097968
July 2009
6-364
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Zabel Mi KLingenheben Ti Franz MRi Hohnloser SH. (1998). Assessment of QT Dispersion for Prediction of
Mortality or Arrhythmic Events After Myocardial Infarction • Results of a Prospective, Long-term
Follow-up Study. , 97: 2543-2550. 156176
Zanchi ACi Venturini CDi Saiki Mi Nascimento Saldiva PHi Tannhauser Barros HMi Rhoden CR. (2008).
Chronic nasal instillation of residual-oil fly ash (ROFA) induces brain lipid peroxidation and behavioral
changes in rats. Inhal Toxicol, 20: 795-800. 157173
Zanobetti Ai Canner MJi Stone PHi Schwartz Ji Sher Di Eagan-Bengston Ei Gates KAi Hartley LHi Suh Hi
Gold DR. (2004). Ambient pollution and blood pressure in cardiac rehabilitation patients. , 110: 2184"
2189. 087489
Zanobetti Ai Schwartz J. (2003). Airborne particles and hospital admissions for heart and lung disease. 043119
Zanobetti Ai Schwartz J. (2003). Airborne particles and hospital admissions for heart and lung disease. In:
Revised analyses of time-series studies of air pollution and health. Special Report. 157174
Zanobetti Ai Schwartz J. (2003). Multicity assessment of mortality displacement within the APHEA2 project.
042812
Zanobetti Ai Schwartz J. (2005). The effect of particulate air pollution on emergency admissions for myocardial
infarction: a multicity case-crossover analysis. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 978-982. 088069
Zanobetti Ai Schwartz J. (2006). Air pollution and emergency admissions in Boston, MA. J Epidemiol
Community Health, 60: 890-895. 090195
Zanobetti Ai Schwartz J. (2009). The effect of fine and coarse particulate air pollution on mortality: A national
analysis. Environ Health Perspect, 117: 1-40. 188462
Zareba Wi Couderc JPi Oberdorster Gi Chalupa Di Cox Ci Huang LSi Peters Ai Utell MJi Frampton MW.
(2009). ECG parameters and exposure to carbon ultrafine particles in young healthy subjects. Inhal
Toxicol, 21: 223-233. 190101
Zeka Ai Sullivan JRi Vokonas PS; Sparrow Di Schwartz J. (2006). Inflammatory markers and particulate air
pollution: characterizing the pathway to disease. Int J Epidemiol, 35: 1347-1354. 157177
Zeka Ai Zanobetti A; Schwartz J. (2005). Short term effects of particulate matter on cause specific mortality:
effects of lags and modification by city characteristics. Occup Environ Med, 62: 718-725. 088068
Zeka A; Zanobetti A; Schwartz J. (2006). Individual-level modifiers of the effects of particulate matter on daily
mortality. Am J Epidemiol, 163: 849-859. 088749
Zelikoff JT; Chen LC; Cohen MD! Fang K> Gordon T; Li Y; Nadziejko C; Schlesinger RB. (2003). Effects of
inhaled ambient particulate matter on pulmonary antimicrobial immune defense. Inhal Toxicol, 15: 131-
150. 039009
Zhang SH; Reddick RL; Piedrahita JA; Maeda N. (1992). Spontaneous hypercholesterolemia and arterial lesions
in mice lacking apolipoprotein E. , 258: 468-471. 157180
Zhang Z; Whitsel E; Quibrera P; Smith R; Liao D; Anderson G; Prineas R. (2009). Ambient Fine Particulate
Matter Exposure and Myocardial Ischemia in the Environmental Epidemiology of Arrhythmogenesis in
the Women?s Health Initiative (EEAWHI) Study. Environ Health Perspect, 117: 751. 191970
July 2009
6-365
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Chapter 7. Integrated Health Effects of
Long-Term PM Exposure
7.1. Introduction
This chapter summarizes reviews and integrates the evidence on relationships
between health effects and long-term exposures to various size fractions and sources of PM.
Cardiopulmonary health effects of long-term exposure to PM have been examined in an
extensive body of epidemiologic, human clinical, and toxicological studies. Both
epidemiologic and toxicological studies provide a basis for examining reproductive and
developmental and cancer health outcomes with regard to long-term exposure to PM. In
addition, there is a large body of epidemiologic literature evaluating the relationship
between mortality and long-term exposure to PM.
Conclusions from the 2004 PM AQCD are summarized briefly at the beginning of each
section, and the evaluation of evidence from recent studies builds upon what was available
during the previous review. For each health outcome (e.g., respiratory infections, lung
function), results are summarized for studies from the specific scientific discipline,
i.e., epidemiologic and toxicological studies. The sections conclude with summaries of the
evidence on the various health outcomes and integration of the findings that leads to
conclusions regarding causality based upon the framework described in Chapter 1.
Determination of causality is made for the overall health effect category, such as
cardiovascular effects, with coherence and plausibility being based upon the evidence from
across disciplines and also across the suite of related health outcomes. In these summary
sections, the evidence is summarized and independent conclusions drawn for relationships
with PM2.5, PM10-2.5, and ultrafine particles.
7.2. Cardiovascular and Systemic Effects
Studies examining associations between long-term exposure to ambient PM (over
months to years) and CVD morbidity had not been conducted and thus were not included in
the 1996 or 2004 PM Air Quality Criteria Documents (U.S. EPA, 1996, 079380; U.S. EPA,
2004, 056905). A number of studies were included in the 2004 PM AQCD that evaluated the
effect of long-term PM2.5 exposure on cardiovascular mortality and found consistent
associations. No toxicological studies examined chronic atherosclerotic effects of PM
Note- Hyperlinks to the reference citations throughout this document will take you to the NCEA HERO database (Health
and Environmental Research Online) at http• //epa.gov/hero. HERO is a database of scientific literature used by U.S. EPA in
the process of developing science assessments such as the Integrated Science Assessments (ISA) and the Integrated Risk
Information System (IRIS).
July 2009
7-1
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
exposure in animal models. However, a subchronic study that evaluated atherosclerosis
progression in hyperlipidemic rabbits was discussed and this study provided the foundation
for the subsequent work that has been conducted in this area (Suwa et al., 2002, 028588).
No previous toxicological studies evaluated effects of subchronic or chronic PM exposure on
diabetes measures, or HR or HRV changes, nor were there animal toxicological studies
included in the 2004 PM AQCD that evaluated systemic inflammatory or blood coagulation
markers following subchronic or chronic PM exposure.
Several new epidemiologic studies have examined the long-term PM-CVD association
among U.S. and European populations. The studies investigate the association of both
PM2.5 and PM10 exposures with a variety of clinical and subclinical CVD outcomes.
Epidemiologic and toxicological studies have provided evidence of the adverse effects of
long-term exposure to PM2.5 on cardiovascular outcomes, including atherosclerosis, clinical
and subclinical markers of cardiovascular morbidity, and cardiovascular mortality. The
evidence of these effects from long-term exposure to PM10-2.5 is weaker.
7.2.1. Atherosclerosis
Atherosclerosis is a progressive disease that contributes to several adverse outcomes,
including myocardial infarction and aortic aneurysm. It is multifaceted, beginning with an
early injury or inflammation that promotes the extravasation of inflammatory cells. Under
conditions of oxidative or nitrosative stress and high lipid or cholesterol concentrations, the
vessel wall undergoes a chronic remodeling that is characterized by the presence of foam
cells, migrated and differentiated smooth muscle cells, and ultimately a fibrous cap. The
advanced lesion that develops from this process can occlude perfusion to distal tissue,
causing ischemia, and erode, degrade, or even rupture, revealing coagulant initiators
(tissue factor) that promote thrombosis, stenosis, and infarction or stroke. Several detailed
reviews of atherosclerosis pathology have been published elsewhere (Ross, 1999, 156926;
Stocker and Keaney JF, 2004, 157013).
7.2.1.1. Epidemiologic Studies
Measures of Atherosclerosis
Although no study has examined the association between long-term PM exposure and
longitudinal change in subclinical markers of atherosclerosis, several cross sectional studies
have been conducted. Markers of atherosclerosis used in these studies include coronary
artery calcium (CAC), carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), ankle-brachial index (ABI),
and abdominal aortic calcium (AAC). These measures are descried briefly below.
CAC is a measure of atherosclerosis assessed by non-contrast, cardiac-gated electron
beam computed tomography (EBCT) or multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) of the
July 2009
7-2
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
coronary arteries in the heart (Greenland and Kizilbash, 2005, 156496; Hoffmann et al.,
2005, 156556; Mollet et al., 2005, 155988). The prevalence of CAC is strongly related to age.
Few people have detectable CAC in their second decade of life but the prevalence of CAC
rises to approximately 100% by age 80 (Ardehali et al., 2007, 155662). Previous studies
suggest that while the absence of CAC does not rule out atherosclerosis, it does imply a
very low likelihood of significant arterial obstruction (Achenbach and Daniel, 2001, 156189;
A rail et al., 1996, 155661; Shaw et al., 2003, 156083; Shemesh et al., 1996, 156085).
Conversely, the presence of CAC confirms the existence of atherosclerotic plaque and the
amount of calcification varies directly with the likelihood of obstructive disease (Ardehali et
al., 2007, 155662). CAC is a quantified using the Agatston method (Agatston et al., 1990,
156197). Its repeatability depends on the laboratory and the method of calculation
(O'Rourke et al. 2000). Agatston scores are frequently used to classify individuals into one
of five groups (zero! mild; moderate! severe! extensive) or according to age- and sex-specific
percentiles of the CAC distribution (Erbel et al., 2007, 155768).
CIMT is a measure of atherosclerosis assessed by high-resolution, B-mode
ultrasonography of the carotid arteries in the neck, the walls of which have inner (intimal),
middle (medial) and outer (adventitial) layers (Craven et al., 1990, 155740! O'Leary et al.,
1999, 156826! Wendelhag et al., 1993, 157136). CIMT estimates the distance in mm or jum
between the innermost (blood-intima) and outermost (media-adventitia) interfaces, often by
averaging over three arterial segments in the common carotid, carotid bulb, and internal
carotid artery (Amato et al., 2007, 155656). CIMT has been associated with atherosclerosis
risk factors (Heiss et al., 1991, 156535; O'Leary et al., 1992, 156825; Salonen and Salonen,
1991, 156938), prevalent coronary heart disease (Chambless et al., 1997, 156329;
Geroulakos et al., 1994, 155788), and incident coronary and cerebral events (O'Leary et al.,
1999, 156826; van der Meer et al., 2004, 156129). Several studies have indicated that CIMT
measurements are accurate (Girerd et al., 1994, 156474; Pignoli et al., 1986, 156026;
Wendelhag et al., 1991, 157135) and reproducible (Montauban van Swijndregt et al., 1999,
156777; Smilde et al., 1997, 156988; Willekes et al., 1999, 157147), especially for the
common carotid artery (Montauban van Swijndregt et al., 1999, 156777).
ABI, which is also known as the ankle-arm or resting (blood) pressure index, is a
measure of lower extremity arterial occlusive disease commonly caused by advanced
atherosclerosis (Weitz et al., 1996, 156150). It is assessed by continuous wave Doppler and
manual or automated oscillometric sphygmomanometry, the latter having been shown to
have higher repeatability and validity (Weitz et al., 1996, 156150). ABI is defined as the
unitless ratio of ankle to brachial systolic blood pressures measured in mmHg. As ankle
pressure is normally equal to or slightly higher than arm pressure (resulting in an ABI >
1.0), epidemiologic studies typically define the normal ABI range as 0.90 to 1.50 (Resnick et
al., 2004, 156048). Low ABI has been associated with all-cause and CVD mortality
July 2009
7-3
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
(Newman et al., 1993, 156805; Vogt et al., 1993, 157100), as well as myocardial infarction
and stroke (Karthikeyan and Lip, 2007, 156626).
AAC is a measure of atherosclerosis assessed by non-contrast, EBCT or MDCT of the
abdominal aorta. It is scored much like CAC (Agatston et al., 1990, 156197), but the age-
specific prevalence and extent of AAC is greater, particularly among women and at ages
>50 years. Although AAC has not been studied as extensively as CAC, it is associated with
carotid and coronary atherosclerosis as well as cardiovascular morbidity and mortality
(Allison et al., 2004, 156210; Allison et al., 2006, 155653; Hollander et al., 2003, 156562;
Khoury et al., 1997, 156636; Oei et al., 2002, 156820; Walsh et al., 2002, 157103; Wilson et
al., 2001, 156159; Witteman et al., 1986, 156161) and measurements are sufficiently
reproducible to allow serial investigations over time (Budoff et al., 2005, 192105).
Study Findings
Diez et al. (2008, 156401) conducted cross-sectional analyses of the association of
three of these subclinical markers of atherosclerosis (CAC, CIMT and ABI), collected from
2000 to 2003 during baseline examinations of participants enrolled in the Multi-Ethnic
Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA), with long-term exposure to PM2.5 and PM10. The study
population included 5,172 ethnically diverse people (53% female) residing in Baltimore,
MD; Chicago, IL; Forsyth County, NC; Los Angeles, CA; New York, NY; and St. Paul, MN
ranging in age from 45 to 84 years old. Authors used spatio-temporal modeling of pollutant
concentrations, weather and demographic data to impute 20-yr avg exposures to PM2.5 and
PM10. They reported small increases in CIMT of 1% (95% CP 0%-1.4%) and 0.5% (95%
CP 0%-l%), which correspond to absolute changes of 8 (95% CP 0-12) and 7 (95%
CP 0-14) jum, per 10 pg/m3 increase in 20-yr avg PM10 and PM2.5 concentration, respectively.
Evidence of age-, gender-, lipid- and smoking-related susceptibility was lacking. They also
reported weak, non-significant increases in the relative prevalence of CAC of 1% (95%
CP -2% to 4%) and 0.5% (95% CP -2% to 3%) per 10 pg/m3 increase in PM10 and PM2.5,
respectively. Among the subset of 2,586 participants with EBCT-identified calcification,
similarly weak associations were observed. There was little evidence of modification of the
CAC associations by demographic, socioeconomic or clinical characteristics. Finally, the
authors report no differences in mean ABI with PM10 or PM2.5 concentrations. The null
findings for ABI exhibited little heterogeneity among participant subgroups and were
similarly null when ABI was modeled as a dichotomous outcome using a cutpoint of 0.9
units.
MESA investigators also examined the chronic PM2.5-AAC association in a
residentially stable subset of 1,147 participants (mean age = 66 yr; 50% female) randomly
selected from all MESA centers, except Baltimore, MD for enrollment in its Aortic Calcium
Ancillary Study (Allen et al., 2009, 189644). The authors used kriging and inverse
residence-to-monitor distance-weighted averaging of EPAAQS data to estimate 2-yr mean
exposures to PM2.5. In cross-sectional analyses, the authors found a 6% (95% CP -4% to
July 2009
7-4
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
16%) excess risk of a non-zero Agatston score and an 8% (95% CP -30% to 46%) increase in
AAC, i.e., approximately 50 (95% CI: -251 to 385) Agatston units, per 10 pg/m3 increase in
PM2.5 concentration. These associations were stronger among users than non-users of anti-
hyperlipidemics.
Kunzli et al. (2005, 087387) used baseline data collected between 1998-2003 from two
randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials, the Vitamin E Atherosclerosis Progression
Study (VEAPS) and the B-Vitamin Atherosclerosis Intervention Trial (BVAIT), for their
ancillary cross-sectional analyses of the effect of long-term PM2.5 exposure on CIMT. The
study population included 798 residents of the greater Los Angeles, CA area who were more
than 40 years old at baseline and 44% were female. The authors used universal kriging of
PM2.5 data from 23 state and local monitors operating in 2000 to estimate 1-yr avg exposure
to PM2.5 at each participant's geocoded U.S. Postal Service ZIP code. They found a 4.2%
(95% CP -0.2% to 8.9%) or approximately 32 (95% CP -2 to 68) pm increase in CIMT per
10 pg/m3 increase in PM2.5 concentration. In contrast to findings from the relatively large,
ethnically diverse, yet geographically overlapping MESA ancillary study described above,
PM-related increases in CIMT were two- to three-fold larger among older and female
participants taking anti-hyperlipidemics in this study. PM-related increases in CIMT were
also higher in never smokers when compared with current or former smokers.
Hoffmann et al. (2007, 091163) conducted a cross-sectional analysis of data collected
at baseline (2000 to 2003) for 4,494 residents of Essen, Mulheim and Bochum, Germany
enrolled in the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study from 2000 to 2003. The age of particpants
ranged from 45-74 years and 51% were female. In this cross-sectional study the authors
used dispersion and chemistry transport modeling of emissions, climate and topography
data to estimate one-yr avg exposure to PM2 .5 in 2002 (the midpoint of the baseline exam. ) They reported
an imprecise 43% (95% CP -15% to 115%) or 102 (95% CP -77 to 273) Agatston unit increase
in CAC per 10 pg/m3 increase in PM2.5. Differences in strength of association between
subgroups defined by demographic and clinical characteristics were small. The authors
reported a more consistent association of CAC with traffic exposure (distance from a major
roadway) than with PM2.5 in this study.
In a subsequent analysis of these data, Hoffmann et al. (2009, 190376) examined the
PM-ABI association in this population. In this cross-sectional study, no changes in ABI were
observed in association with PM2.5 concentration nor was evidence of effect modification by
demographic and clinical characteristics apparent. As in the previous study, residing near a
major roadway was a stronger predictor of atherosclerotic changes. Absolute changes in ABI
of -0.024 (95% CP -0.047 to -0.001) were associated with living within 50 m of a major
roadway compared to living more than 200 m away.
Each of the studies described above relied on cross-sectional analyses examining
differences in long-term average PM2.5 concentrations across space (as well as time to the
extent baseline examinations were conducted over time). Such associations may reflect the
July 2009
7-5
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
effect of compositional differences in PM2.5 as well as the effect of higher PM2.5
concentrations. Most associations of PM2.5 with CAC (Diez Roux et al., 2008, 156401;
Hoffmann et al., 2007, 091163), CIMT (Diez Roux et al., 2008, 156401; Kunzli et al., 2005,
087387), ABI (Diez Roux et al., 2008, 156401; Hoffmann et al., 2009, 190376) and AAC
(Allen et al., 2009, 189644) reviewed in this section were weak and/or imprecise. However,
several factors including exposure measurement error, variation in baseline measures
atherosclerosis, as well as limited power may contribute to the insensitivity of these cross-
sectional studies to detect small differences in CAC, CIMT, ABI and AAC. The study by
Hoffmann et al. (2007, 091163), which reported large, imprecise and non-significant
increases in CAC in association with PM2.5, is not distinguished from the other studies
reviewed by a superior study design or larger sample size. The several fold difference in the
magnitude of CIMT associations reported by Kunzli et al. (2005, 087387) and Diez Roux et
al. (2008, 156401) may be related to differences between the study populations. The
ambient PM concentrations from these studies are characterized in Table 7-1.
7.2.1.2. Toxicological Studies
In the only study of this kind described in the 2004 PM AQCD, Suwa et al. (2002,
028588) demonstrated more advanced atherosclerotic lesions based on phenotype and
volume fraction in the left main and right coronary arteries of rabbits exposed to PM10 (5
mg/kg, 2 times/wk x 4 wks). Although this study was conducted using IT exposure
methodology at a relatively high dose, it provided the first experimental evidence that PM
exposure may result in progression of atherosclerosis. Recent toxicological studies
conducted using inhalation exposures have replicated these findings at relevant
concentrations and are discussed below.
CAPs
New studies have demonstrated increased atherosclerotic plaque area in aortas of
ApoE"'" mice exposed to PM2.5 CAPs for 4-6 months (6 h/day x 5 days/wk). Average CAPs
concentrations ranged from 85 to 138 pg/m3 and all were conducted in Tuxedo or
Manhattan, NY. Chen and Nadziejko (2005, 087219) reported that the percentage of aortic
intimal surface covered by atherosclerotic lesions in ApoE"'" mice was increased. In male
ApoE'/LDLR'" mice, both lesion area and cellularity in the aortic root were enhanced by
Tuxedo, NY CAPs exposure, although there was no change in lipid content. Genetic profiles
within plaques recovered from ApoE"'" mice included many of the molecular pathways
known to contribute to atherosclerosis, including inflammation (Floyd et al., 2009, 190350).
Sun (2005, 186814) similarly demonstrated an enhancement of atherosclerosis in ApoE"'"
mice exposed Tuxedo, NY CAPs. Plaque area in the aortic arch and abdominal aorta was
significantly increased in the PM-exposed, high fat-chow group compared to air-exposed,
high fat-chow group. Macrophage infiltration in the abdominal aorta was also observed in
July 2009
7-6
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
the groups exposed to CAPs. A study conducted in Manhattan for 4-months (5-9/2007)
showed that PM2.5 CAPs exposure increased atherosclerotic plaque area and led to higher
levels of macrophage infiltration, collagen deposition, and lipid composition in thoracic
aortas of ApoE"'" mice (Ying et al., 2009, 190111). which is consistent with the previous two
studies described that were conducted in Tuxedo, NY.
Alteration of vasomotor function has been observed in aortic rings of ApoE-'- mice on a
high fat diet with long-term exposure to CAPs (Sun et al., 2005, 186814; Ying et al., 2009,
190111). Sun (2005, 186814) reported that PM2.5-exposed animals exhibited increased
vasoconstrictor responsiveness to serotonin and PE. Increased ROS and elevated iNOS
protein expression in aortic sections of CAPs-exposed mice may have resulted alterations in
the NO pathway and generation of peroxynitirite that could have affected vascular
reactivity. In contrast, Ying, et al. (2009, 190111) demonstrated decreased maximum
constriction induced by PE following Manhattan CAPs exposure. Pretreatment with the
soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) inhibitor ODQ attenuated the response, indicating that
CAPs exposure resulted in abnormal NO/sGC signaling. iNOS mRNA and protein
expression was increased in aortas of CAPs-exposed mice, further supporting a role for NO
production. In conjunction with increased NO, aortic superoxide production was
demonstrated that appeared to be partially driven by increased NADPH oxidase activity.
The difference in vasoconstrictor responses between these two studies may be attributable
to varying durations (6 vs. 4 months, respectively) or CAPs compositions.
Sun (2005, 186814) and Ying et al. (2001, 019011) reported similar relaxation
responses to ACh for air- and CAPs-exposed mice. However, Manhattan CAPs-exposed mice
had a markedly decreased response to A23187, indicating that NO release occurred via
Ca2+-dependent mechanisms (Ying et al., 2009, 190111). Abnormal eNOS function is likely
responsible for the decreased relaxation response, as activation of eNOS (but not iNOS) is
Ca2+-dependent.
A recent study (Sun et al., 2008, 157033) that was part of the research described
above (Sun et al., 2005, 186814) investigated tissue factor (TF) expression in aortas, which
is a major regulator of hemostasis and thrombosis following vascular injury or plaque
erosion. In PM2.5-exposed ApoE"'" mice on a high-fat diet, TF was significantly elevated in
the plaques of aortic sections compared to air-exposed mice on the high-fat diet. TF
expression was generally detected in (l) the extracellular matrix surrounding macrophages
and foam cell-rich areas and (2) around smooth muscle cells.
One new study of CAPs PM2.5 or ultrafine PM derived from traffic was conducted.
Araujo et al. (2008, 156222) compared the relative impact of ultrafine (0.01-0.18 pm) and
fine (0.01-2.5 pm) PM inhalation on aortic lesion development in ApoE"'" mice following a
40"day exposure (5 h/day x 3 days/wk for 75 total hours). Animals were on a normal chow
diet and exposed to CAPs in a mobile inhalation laboratory parked 300 m from a freeway in
downtown Los Angeles. Exposure concentrations were -440 pg/m3 for PM2.5 and -110 pg/m3
July 2009
7-7
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
for ultrafine PM, and the number concentrations were roughly equivalent (4.56 x 105 and
5.59 x 10B particles/cm3 for PM2.5 and ultrafine PM, respectively). Significant increases in
plaque size (estimated by lesions at the aortic root) were reported for mice exposed to
ultrafine PM only. The lesions were largely comprised of macrophages with intracellular
lipid accumulation. Increased total cholesterol measured at the end of the exposure protocol
was observed only in the PM2.5 group. HDL isolated from the ultrafine PM-exposed mice
demonstrated decreased anti-inflammatory protective capacity against LDL-induced
monocyte chemotactic activity in an in vitro assay. The livers from the ultrafine
PM-exposed mice demonstrated significant increases in lipid peroxidation and several
stress-related gene products (catalase, glutathione S-transferase Ya, NADPH-quinone
oxidoreductasel, superoxide dismutase 2). Thus, ultrafine PM in these exposures had a
substantially greater impact on the systemic response than did PM2.5.
PM10
A study employing young BALB/c mice examined the effects of a 4-month exposure (24
h/day x 7 days/wk) to ambient air on arterial histopathology (Lemos et al., 2006, 088594).
Outdoor exposure chambers were located in downtown Sao Paulo, Brazil next to streets of
high traffic density. In the control chamber, PM10 and NO2 were filtered with 50% and 75%
efficiency, respectively. The average pollutant concentrations were 2.06 ppm for CO (8-h
mean), 104.75 pg/m3 for NO2 (24-h mean), 11.07 pg/m3 for SO2 (24-h mean), and 35.52 pg/m3
for PM10 (24-h mean) at a monitoring site within 100 m of the inhalation chambers. The
pulmonary and coronary arteries demonstrated significant decreases in LAV ratio for
animals exposed to the entire ambient mixture compared to controls, indicating thicker
walls in these vessels. There was no difference reported for the LAV ratio in renal arteries.
Morphologic examination suggested that the increases in LAV ratio were due to muscular
hypertrophy rather than fibrosis. The results of this study indicate vascular remodeling of
the pulmonary and coronary arteries, as opposed to changes in tone.
To examine the role of systemic inflammation and recruitment of monocytes into
plaque tissue as a possible pathway for accelerated atherosclerosis, Yatera et al. (2008,
157162) exposed female Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits (42 weeks old) to
Ottawa PM10 (EHC-93) via intratracheal instillation (5 mg/rabbit; approximately 1.56
mg/kg) twice a week for 4 wk. Transfusion of whole blood harvested to from exposed and
non-exposed animals to donor rabbits supplied labeled monocytes for assessment of
monocyte recruitment from the blood to the aortic wall. The fraction of aortic surface and
volume of aortic wall taken up by atherosclerotic plaque was increased and the number of
labeled monocytes in the atherosclerotic plaques was elevated in rabbits exposed to PM10.
In addition, labeled monocytes were attached onto the endothelium overlying
atherosclerotic plaques and the number that migrated into the smooth muscle underneath
plaques in aortic vessel walls was greater with PM10 exposure compared to control. These
July 2009
7-8
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
responses were not observed in normal vessel walls. ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 expression was
elevated in atherosclerotic lesions, likely indicating enhanced monocyte adhesion to
endothelium and migration into plaques. Monocytes in plaque tissue stained with
immunogold demonstrated foam cell characteristics, which were more numerous in the
rabbits exposed to PMio.
Gasoline Exhaust
Lund and colleagues (2007, 125741) used whole emissions from gasoline exhaust to
investigate changes in the transcriptional regulation of several gene products with known
roles in both the chronic promotion and acute degradation/destabilization of atheromatous
plaques. These 50-day exposures (6 h/day x 7 days/wk) employed ApoE"'" mice on high-fat
chow and the concentrations of the high exposure group were 61 pg/m3 for PM, 19 ppm for
NOx, 80 ppm for CO, and 12.0 ppm for total hydrocarbons. The average particle number
median diameter was approximately 15 nm (McDonald et al., 2007, 156746). Dilutions of
gasoline engine emissions induced a concentration-dependent increase in transcription of
matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) isoform 9, ET-1, and HOI in aortas! MMP-3 and -9 mRNA
levels were only increased in animals in the highest exposure group. Strong increases in
oxidative stress markers (nitrotyrosine and TBARS) in the aortas were also observed.
However, using a high-efficiency particle trap, they established that most of the effects were
caused by the gaseous portion of the emissions and not the particles. This study did not
directly address lesion area.
7.2.2. Venous Thromboembolism
One epidemiologic study examined the relationship between long term PMio
concentration, venous thromboembolism, and laboratory measures of hemostasis
(prothrombin and activated partial thomboplastin times [PT; PTT]). PT and PTT measure
the extrinsic and intrinsic blood coagulation pathways, the former activated in response to
blood vessel injury, the latter, key to subsequent amplification of the coagulation cascade
and propagation of thrombus (Mackman et al., 2007, 156723). Decreases in PT and PTT are
consistent with a hypercoagulable, prothrombotic state.
7.2.2.1. Epidemiologic Studies
Baccarelli et al. (2007, 090733) studied 2,081 residents (56% female) of the Lombardy
region of Italy whose ages ranged from 18 to 84 years old. In this case-control study of 871
patients with ultrasonographically or venographically diagnosed lower extremity deep vein
thrombosis (DVT) and 1,210 of their healthy friends or relatives (1995-2005), the authors
used arithmetic averaging of PMio data available at 53 monitors in nine geographic areas to
estimate one-yr avg residence-specific exposures. They found -0.09 (95% CP -0.16 to 0) and
July 2009
7-9
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
¦0.18 (95% CL -0.35 to 0) decreases in standardized correlation coefficients for PT as well as
0.02 (95% CL -0.05 to 0.06) and -0.11 (95% CI: -0.29 to 0.12) decreases in standardized
correlation coefficients for PTT among cases and controls, respectively, per 10 pg/m3
increase in PMio. Patients with DVT who were taking heparin or coumarin anticoagulants
were not asked to stop taking them before measurement of PT and aPTT. Of additional
note, PT was neither adjusted for differences in reagents used to determine it nor
conventionally reported as the International Normalized Ratio (INR). The ambient PM
concentrations from this study are characterized in Table 7-1.
7.2.3. Diabetes
7.2.3.1. Toxicological Studies
Diabetics as a potentially susceptible subpopulation have only recently been
evaluated. A toxicological study of a diet-induced obesity mouse model (C57BL/6 fed high-
fat chow for 10 wk) examined the effects of a 128-day PM2.5 CAPs exposure (mean mass
concentration 72.7 pg/m3; Tuxedo, NY) on insulin resistance, adipose inflammation, and
visceral adiposity (Sun et al., 2009, 190487). Elevated fasting glucose and insulin levels
were observed in CAPs-exposed mice compared to air-exposed during the glucose tolerance
test. Aortic rings of mice exposed to CAPs demonstrated decreased peak relaxation to ACh
or insulin, which was associated with reduced NO bioavailability. Additionally, insulin
signaling was impaired in aortic tissue via lowered endothelial Akt phosphorylation.
Increases in adipokines and systemic inflammatory markers (i.e., TNF-a, IL-6, E-selectin,
ICAM-1, PAP1, resistin, leptin) were reported for CAPs-exposed mice. CAPs resulted in
increased visceral and mesenteric fat mass, as well as greater adipose tissue macrophages
in epididymal fat pads and larger adipocyte size compared to mice in the filtered air group.
The results of this study demonstrate that PM2.5 exposure can exaggerate insulin
resistance, visceral adiposity, and inflammation in mice fed high-fat chow.
7.2.4. Systemic Inflammation, Immune Function, and Blood
Coagulation
7.2.4.1. Epidemiologic Studies
Chen and Schwartz (2008, 190106) studied 2,978 residentially stable participants in
33 U.S. communities (age range = 20-89 years! 49% female) who were examined during
phase 1 of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (1989-1991). In this
cross-sectional study, the authors used inverse-distance weighted averaging of U.S. EPA
AQS monitored data from participant and adjacent counties of residence to estimate one-
July 2009
7-10
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
yr avg exposures to PMio (median concentration within quartiles = 23.1, 31.2, 38.8 and 53.7
jug/m3). They found that after adjustment, residents of communities in quartile 1 had 138
(95% CP 2-273) fewer white blood cells (x 106/L) than residents of communities in quartiles
2-4. This difference increased with increasing number of metabolic abnormalities (insulin
resistance! hypertension! hypertriglyceridemia! low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol!
abdominal obesity) reported by the participant.
Forbes et al. (2009, 190351) studied approximately 25,000 adults (age > 16 yr! 53%
female) who were representatively sampled from 720 English postcode sectors and
participated in the Health Survey for England (1994, 1998 and 2003). In this fixed-effects
meta-analysis of year-specific cross-sectional findings, the authors used dispersion
modeling of emissions and weather data to estimate two-yr avg exposures to PMio at
participant postcode sector centroids (median in 1994, 1998 and 2003 = 19.5, 17.9 and 16.2
ug/ma). They found little evidence of a PMicrinflammatory marker association, i.e., only a -
0.08% (95% CP -0.25% to 0.10%) decease in fibrinogen concentration and a 0.14% (95%
CP -1.00% to 1.30%) increase in CRP concentration per 1 pg/m3 increase in PMio.
Calderon-Garciduenas et al. (2007, 091252) compared residentially stable, non-
smoking healthy children (age range: 6-13 yr) living and attending school between 2003-
2004 in Mexico City (historically high PM! altitude 2,250 m) and Polotitlan (historically low
PM! altitude 2,380 m). In this ecologic study, residents of Mexico City (n = 59! 93% female)
had fewer white blood cells and neutrophils (x 109/L) than residents of Polotitlan (n = 22!
69% female): unadjusted mean 6.2 (95% CP 5.7-6.6) versus 6.9 (95% CP 6.3-7.5) and 2.9
(95% CP 2.3-3.5) versus 3.8 (95% CP 3.2-4.4), respectively.
Calderon-Garciduenas et al. (2009) subsequently compared 37 unadjusted mean
measures of immune function and inflammation among an expanded number of these
participants. They found that under a two-sided type I error rate (a) = 0.05, sixteen (43%) of
the measures were significantly different in residents of southwest Mexico City (n = 66!
48% female) than those in Polotitlan (n = 93! 57% female). However, only eight measures
were significantly different after Bon Ferroni-correction (a = 0.05 / 37 = 0.001) and even
fewer would be after adjustment for reported correlation between the measures of immune
function and inflammation, e.g., CRP and lipopolysaccharide binding protein (Pearson's r =
0.71).
Only two cross-sectional analyses of PMio concentration and markers of immune
function or inflammation have been conducted with significant changes observed in the
NHANES population (stronger effects among those with metabolic disorders) but not in a
relative large survey of adults, which was conducted in England. Ecological analyses
comparing children in high versus low pollution regions in Mexico show differences in
unadjusted blood markers that may be related to PM concentration or other unmeasured
risk factors that differs across the communities studied.
July 2009
7-11
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
7.2.4.2. Toxicological Studies
In addition to the PM2.5 study mentioned previuosly that showed increased TF
expression (an important initiator of thrombosis) in aortas of ApoE"'" mice following
subchronic CAPs exposure (Sun et al., 2008, 157033). three recent studies examined
hematology and clotting parameters in rats and mice exposed to DE, gasoline exhaust, or
HWS for 1 week or 6 months (Reed et al., 2004, 055625; Reed et al., 2006, 156043; Reed et
al., 2008, 156903). In all studies, male and female F344 rats were exposed to the mixtures
by whole-body inhalation for 6 h/day, 7 day/wk. Respiratory effects for these studies are
presented in Section 7.3.3.
Diesel Exhaust
The target PM concentrations in the diesel exhaust study was 30, 100, 300, and
1000 pg/m3 and the MMAD was 0.10-0.15 pm (Reed et al., 2004, 055625). Male and female
rats exposed to DE at the highest concentration (NO concentration 45.3 ppm! NO2
concentration 4.0 ppm! CO concentration 29.8 ppm! SO2 concentration 365 ppb) for 6
months demonstrated decreased serum Factor VII, but no change in plasma fibrinogen or
TAT (Reed et al., 2004, 055625). White blood cells were decreased only in female rats in the
highest exposure group. Another DE study of shorter duration (4 wk, 4 h/day, 5day/wk; PM
mass concentration 507 or 2201 pg/m3, CO 1.3 and 4.8 ppm, NO <2.5 and 5.9 ppm, NO2
<0.25 and 1.2 ppm, SO2 0.2 and 0.3 ppm for low and high PM exposures, respectively) did
not demonstrate changes in hematologic parameters or those related to coagulation (i.e.,
plasma prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, plasma fibrinogen, D-
dimer) or inflammation (i.e., CRP) in SH or WKY rats (Gottipolu et al., 2009, 190360).
Together, these findings do not support a DE-related stimulation of blood coagulation
following 1 or 6 months of exposure.
Hardwood Smoke
The target PM concentrations in the HWS study was 30, 100, 300, and 1000 pg/m3
and the MMAD was 0.25-0.36 pm (Reed et al., 2006, 156043). In male rats exposed to HWS,
the mid-low group (PM concentration 113 pg/m3! NO, NO2, SO2 concentrations 0 ppm! CO
concentration 1832.3 ppm) had the greatest responses in hematology parameters, including
increased hematocrit, hemoglobin, lymphocytes, and decreased segmented neutrophils
(Reed et al., 2006, 156043). Platelets were elevated in male and female rats after 1 week of
exposure, but this response returned to control values following the 6 month exposure. No
changes were observed for any coagulation markers at 6 months.
Gasoline Exhaust
PM mass in the gasoline exhaust study ranged from 6.6 to 59.1 pg/m3, with the
corresponding number concentration between 2.6 x 104 and 5.0 x 105 particles/cm3; the
July 2009
7-12
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
dilutions for the gasoline exhaust were 1^10, 1^15 or 1:90 and filtered PM at the 1^10
dilution (Reed et al., 2008, 156903). Similar to the responses observed with HWS, male and
female rats in the mid and high gasoline exhaust exposure groups (NO concentrations 11.9
and 18.4 ppm! NO2 concentrations 0.5 and 0.9 ppm! CO concentration 73.2 and 107.3 ppm!
SO2 concentration 0.38 and 0.62 ppm, respectively) demonstrated elevated hematocrit and
hemoglobin; RBC count was also elevated in these groups (Reed et al., 2008, 156903). The
only response that appeared somewhat dependent on the presence of particles was
increased RBC in female rats at 6 months, although the authors attributed the observed
increases to the high concentration of CO.
Collectively, these studies do not indicate robust systemic inflammation or coagulation
responses in F344 rats following 6-month exposures to diesel, HWS, or gasoline exhaust.
The limited effects that were observed could possibly be due to the varying gas
concentrations in the exposure mixtures.
7.2.5. Renal and Vascular Function
Two recent epidemiologic studies have tested associations between PM exposure and
indicators of renal and vascular function (urinary albumin to creatinine ratio [UACR] and
blood pressure). UACR is a measure of urinary albumin excretion (National Kidney, 2008,
156796). When calculated as the ratio of albumin to creatinine concentrations in untimed
("spot") urine samples, UACR approximates 24-h urinary albumin excretion and can be
used to identify albuminuria, a marker of generalized vascular endothelial damage (Xu et
al., 2008, 157157). Values > 30 mg/g (3.5 mg/mmol) and > 300 mg/g (34 mg/mmol) usually
define micro- and macroalbuminuria, both of which are associated with increases in CVD
incidence and mortality (Bigazzi et al., 1998, 156272; Deckert et al., 1996, 156389; Dinneen
and Gerstein, 1997, 156403; Gerstein et al., 2001, 156466; Mogensen, 1984, 156769).
Several researchers have called the dichotomization of albuminuria into question, observing
that there is no threshold below which risk of cardiovascular and end-stage kidney disease
disappears (Forman and Brenner, 2006, 156439; Knight and Curhan, 2003, 179900;
Ruggenenti and Remuzzi, 2006, 156933).
Systolic, diastolic, pulse, and mean arterial blood pressures (SBP; DBP; PP; MAP) in
mmHg have also been used as measures of cardiovascular disease. Franklin et al. (1997,
156446) suggested that SBP and PP were the only two measures predictive of carotid
stenosis in a multivariable analysis considering all four measures, whereas Khattar et al.
(2001, 155896) suggested that their prognostic significance in hypertensive populations
may differ by age, with SBP and PP being most predictive among those > 60 and DBP
among those <60 years old (Khattar et al., 2001, 155896).
July 2009
7-13
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
7.2.5.1. Epidemiologic Studies
O'Neill et al. (2007, 156006) examined the association of UACR with PM2.5 and PM10
among members of the MESA population described previously (Diez Roux et al., 2008,
156401). For this study of UACR, which included cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses,
the study population was restricted to a subset of 3,901 participants (mean age = 63 yr! 52%
female) with complete covariate, outcome and exposure data at their first through third
exams (2000-2004). In cross-sectional analyses, the authors found that after adjustment for
demographic and clinical characteristics, 10 pg/m3 increases in 20-year imputed exposures
to PM2.5 and PM10 were associated with negligible 0.002 (95% CP -0.048 to 0.052) and -0.002
(95% CP -0.038 to 0.035) mean differences in baseline log UACR, respectively. Similarly,
small non-statistically significant decreases in the prevalence of microalbuminuria (defined
in this setting as > 25 mg/g) provided little evidence of an effect on renal function. These
largely null cross-sectional findings mirrored those based on the study's shorter-term (30-
and 60-day) PM2.5 and PM10 exposures. Moreover, longitudinal analyses revealed only a
weak association between three-year change in log UACR and 20-yr PM10 exposure.
Evidence of effect modification by demographic and geographic characteristics was not
apparent in either the cross-sectional or longitudinal analyses.
Auchincloss et al. (2008, 156234) focused on automated, oscillometric,
sphygmomanometric measures of blood pressures in mmHg (SBP; DBP; PP; MAP). Like
O'Neill (2007, 156006), Diez et al. (2008, 156401) and Allen et al. (2007, 156006),
Auchincloss et al. (2008, 156234) based their examination on the previously described
MESA population. The authors included 5,112 study participants (age range = 45-84 years!
52% female) who were free of clinically manifested CVD at their baseline exam in one of six
primarily urban U.S. locations (2000-2002). In this cross-sectional study, they used
arithmetic averaging of EPAAQS PM2.5 data available at the monitor nearest to each
participant's geocoded U.S. Postal Service ZIP code centroid to estimate 30- and 60-day avg
exposures to PM2.5. They found small nonsignificant increases of 1.5 (95% CP -0.2 to 3.2),
0.2 (95% CP -0.7 to 1.0), 1.3 (95% CP 0.1 to 2.6), and 0.6 (95% CP -0.4 to 1.7) mmHg
increases in SBP, DBP, PP and MAP, respectively, per 10 ug/m3 increase in 30-day avg PM2.5
exposure, Associations were slightly weaker for 60-day avg PM2.5 exposure and among
participants without hypertension, during cooler weather, in the presence of low NO2,
residing >300 m from a highway, or surrounded by lower road density.
Finally, the Calderon-Garciduenas et al. (2007, 091252) ecologic study introduced in
Section 7.2.3.1 also found that children residing in Mexico City had higher mean pulmonary
artery pressure as assessed by Doppler echocardiography and fasting plasma endothelin-1
(ET-l) than residents in Polotitlan: unadjusted mean 17.5 (95% CP 15.7-19.4) versus 14.6
(95% CP 13.8-15.4) mmHg and 2.23 (95% CP 1.93-2.53) versus 1.23 (95% CP 1.11-1.35)
pg/mL, respectively. Within Mexico City, ET-l was higher in residents of the Northeast
(historically higher PM2.5) than those of the Southwest (historically lower PM2.5).
July 2009
7-14
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
The MESA analyses of UACR (O'Neill et al., 2007, 156006) and the ecologic study of
children living in a highly polluted area of Mexico (Calderon-Garciduenas et al., 2007,
091252) provide little evidence that long-term exposure to PM2.5 had an effect on renal and
vascular function. Auchincloss et al. (2008, 156234) reports small nonsignificant
associations of blood pressure with 30 and 60 day avg PM2.5 concentrations. PM
concentrations from the analyses are characterized in Table 7-1.
Table 7-1. Characterization of ambient PM concentrations from studies of subclinical measures of
cardiovascular diseases.
Reference
Location
Mean Concentration (|JCj/m3)
Upper Percentile Concentrations
(|jg/m3)
PMia
Diez et al. (2008,156401)
MESA: 6 Cities U.S.
20 yr imputed mean: 34
NR
O'Neill etal. (2007,156006)
MESA: 6 Cities U.S.
Long-Term Exposure:
1982-2002: 34.7
1982-1987:40.5
1988-1992:38
1993-1997: 30.6
1998-2002: 29.7
Previous Month: 27.5
NR
Baccarelli et al. (2008,157984)
Lombardy Italy
Annual avg: 41
NR
Rosenlund et al. (2006, 089796)
Stockholm, Sweden
30-y avg PMio (traffic)
Cases: 2.6
Controls: 2.4
5th-95th %: 0.5-6
0.6-5.9
PMzs
Hoffmann et al.(2007, 091163)
HNRS, 3 Cities Germany
Annual avg: 22.8
NR
Allen etal. (2007,156006)
MESA: 5 Cities
Annual avg: 15.8
Min-Max: 10.6-24.7
Kunzlietal. (2005,087387)
VEAPS BVAIT
Annual avg: 20.3
Min-Max: 5.2-26.9
Auchincloss et al. (2008,156234)
MESA: 6 Cities
Prior 30 days: 16.8
Prior 60 days: 16.7
NR
O'Neill (2007,156006)
MESA: 6 Cities U.S.
Previous Month: 16.5
NR
Diez et al. (2008,156401)
MESA: 6 Cities U.S.
20-y imputed mean: 21.7
NR
Hoffmann et al. (2009,190376)
HNRS: 3 Cities Germany
Annual avg: 22.8
Min-max: 19.8-26.8
MESA: Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
HNRS: Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study
VEAPS: Vitamin E Atherosclerosis Progression Study
BVAIT: B-Vitamin Atherosclerosis Intervention Trial
7.2.5.2. Toxicological Studies
In a PM2.5 CAPs study of 10 wk (6 h/day x 5 days/wk) in Tuxedo, NY (mean mass
concentration 79.1 pg/m3), there was no difference in mean arterial pressure (MAP) in SD
rats between groups (Sun et al., 2008, 157032). When angiotensin II (Ang II) was infused
during the last week of exposure to induce systemic hyptertension, the MAP slope was
consistently greater in the CAPs-exposed rats compared to the filtered air group.
Furthermore, thoracic aortic rings were more responsive to phenylephrine-induced
constriction and less responsive to ACh-induced relaxation in the PM+Ang II vessels. In
July 2009
7-15
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
contrast to the latter findings, the relaxation response was exaggerated in the PM+Ang II
aortic segments with a Rho-kinase (ROCK) inhibitor. Superoxide production in aortic rings
increased in the PM+Ang II group compared to the filtered air group and the addition of
NAD(P oxidase inhibitor (apocymin) or a NOS inhibitor (L-NAME) attenuated the
superoxide generation. The levels of tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) were decreased in
mesenteric vasculature and the heart by 46% and 41% in the PM+Ang II group compared to
controls, respectively! furthermore, levels of BH4 in the liver were similarly reduced, which
is consistent with a systemic effect of CAPs. Together, these findings indicate that CAPs
potentiate Ang 11-induced hypertension and alter vascular reactivity, perhaps through
activated NADPH oxidase and eNOS uncoupling that result in oxidative stress generation
and triggering of the Rho/ROCK signaling pathway.
7.2.6. Autonomic Function
7.2.6.1. Toxicological Studies
Hwang et al. (2005, 087957) and Chen and Hwang (2005, 087218) used
radiotelemetry to examine the chronic changes in HR and HRV resulting from the same
CAPs exposures described previously (Chen and Nadziejko, 2005, 087219). The overall
average CAPs exposure concentration was 133 pg/m3 and results indicate differing
responses to CAPs between ApoE"'" mice and their genetic background strain, C57BL/6J
mice (Hwang et al., 2005, 087957). Using the time period of 1^30 to 4:30 a.m., C57BL/6J
mice showed a HR increase only over the last month of exposure. In contrast, ApoE '" mice
had chronic decreases of 33.8 beat/min for HR. Changes in HRV (SDNN and rMSSD) were
somewhat more complicated, with biphasic responses in ApoE"'" mice over the 5 month
period (initial increase over first 6 wk, decrease over next 12 wk, and slight upward turn for
remainder of the study)(Chen and Hwang, 2005, 087218). Increasing linear trends were
observed in C57BL/6J mice for SDNN and rMSSD. The average CAPs concentration for the
HRV study was 110 pg/m3. However, only 3 C57BL/6J mice in the exposure group were
included in the analysis compared to 10 ApoE"'" animals, thus making it difficult to
interpret the C57BL/6J mice responses (Chen and Hwang, 2005, 087218; Hwang et al.,
2005, 087957).
July 2009
7-16
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7.2.7. Cardiac changes
7.2.7.1. Toxicological studies
Two recent toxicological studies have evaluated the effects of PM on cardiac effects
including pathology and gene expression. Cardiac mitochondrial function has also been
evaluated following PM exposure in rats.
Diesel Exhaust
A recent study of DE exposure (PM mass concentration 507 or 2201 pg/m3, CO 1.3 or
4.8 ppm, NO <2.5 or 5.9 ppm, NO2 <0.25 or 1.2 ppm, SO2 0.2 or 0.3 ppm for low and high
PM exposures, respectively! geometric median number diameter 85 11m) indicated a
hypertensive "like cardiac gene expression in WKY rats that mimicked baseline patterns in
air-exposed SH rats (Gottipolu et al., 2009, 190360). Exposure to the high concentration of
DE for 4 wk (4 h/day, 5 day/wk) led to downregulation of genes involved in stress,
antioxidant compensatory response, growth and extracellular matrix regulation, membrane
transport of molecules, mitochondrial function, thrombosis regulation, and immune
function. No genes were affected by DE in SH rats. A dose-dependent inhibition of
mitochondrial aconitase activity in both rat starins was observed, indicating a DE effect on
oxidative stress. It should be noted that while DE-related cardiovascular effects were found
in WKY rats only, pulmonary inflammation and injury were observed in both strains (see
Sections 7.3.3.2. and 7.3.5.1.).
Model Particles
Wallenborn et al. (2008, 191171) examined the subchronic (5 h/day, 3 day/wk, 16 wk)
pulmonary, cardiac, and systemic effects of nose-only exposure to particulate ZnS04 (9, 35,
or 120 pg/m3) in WKY rats. Particle size was reported to be 31-44 nm measured as number
median diameter. Although changes in pulmonary inflammation or injury and cardiac
pathology were not observed, effects on cardiac mitochondrial protein and enzyme levels
were noted (i.e., increased ferritin levels, decrease in succinate dehydrogenase activity),
possibly indicating a small degree of mitochondrial dysfunction. Glutathione peroxidase, an
antioxidant enzyme, was also decreased in the cardiac cytosol. Gene expression analysis
identified alterations in cardiac genes involved in cell signaling events, ion channels
regulation, and coagulation in animals exposed to the highest ZnS04 concentration only.
This study demonstrates a possible direct effect of ZnS04 on extrapulmonary systems, as
suggested by the lack of pulmonary effects (see Section 7.3.3.2).
July 2009
7-17
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
7.2.8. Left Ventricular Mass and Function
Van Hee et al. (2009) studied 3,827 participants (age range = 45-84 yr! 53% female)
who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the heart at the baseline examination
of the MESA cohort (2000-2002). This cross-sectional study focused on two MRPbased
outcome measures^ left ventricular mass index (LVMI, g/m2) and ejection fraction (EF, %),
the former estimated using the DuBois formula for body surface area, the latter as the ratio
of stroke volume to end diastolic volume. The study also estimated annual mean exposures
to PM2.5 at participants' geocoded residential addresses in 2000 using ordinary kriging of
U.S. EPAAQS concentration data. In fully adjusted models, it found 3.8 (95% CP -6.1 to
13.7) g/m2 and -3.0% (-8.0% to 2.0%) differences in LVMI and EF per 10 jug/m3 increment in
PM2.5. The findings were small and imprecise, albeit suggestive of a slight, PM-associated
increase in the mass and decrease in the function of the left ventricle. The effect of living
within 50 m of a major roadway on LVMI was greater than the effect of PM2.5 (i.e., 1.4 g/m2
[95% CP 0.3-2.5] per 10 |ug/m3.)
Table 7-2. Characterization of ambient PM concentrations from studies of clinical cardiovascular
diseases.
Reference
Location
Mean Annual
Concentration ([jg/m3)
Upper Percentile
Concentrations (|jg/m3)
PMia
Puett et al. (2008,156891)
13 U.S. States
21.6
Zanobetti and Schwartz (2007, 091247)
21 U.S. Cities
28.8
Overall range NR
Rosenlund et al. (2006, 089796)
Stockholm, Sweden
30 y avg PMio (traffic)
5th-95th Percentile
Cases: 2.6
0.5-6.0
Controls: 2.4
0.6-5.9
Maheswaran et al. (2005, 090769)
Sheffield, U.K.
Range of means in each quintile: 16-23.3
NR
Baccarelli et al. (2007, 090733)
Lombardy, Italy
Sep-Nov: 51.2
148.9
Dec-Feb: 68.5
238.3
Mar-May:64.1
158.5
Jun-Aug: 44.3
94.7
PMzs
Miller et al. (2007, 090130)
WHI: 36 Metropolitan areas
Citywide avg (yr 2000): 13.5
Min-max: 4-19.3
Hoffmann et al. (2006, 091162)
HNRS: 2 Cities Germany
23.3
NR
WHI: Womens Health Initiative
HNRS: Hans Nixdorf Recall Study
7.2.9. Clinical Outcomes in Epidemiologic Studies
Several epidemiologic studies of U.S. and European populations have examined
associations between long-term PM exposures and clinical CVD events (Baccarelli et al.,
July 2009
7-18
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
2008, 157984; Hoffmann et al., 2006, 091162; Hoffmann et al., 2009, 190376; Maheswaran
et al., 2005, 088683; Maheswaran et al., 2005, 090769; Miller et al., 2007, 090130;
Rosenlund et al., 2006, 089796; Solomon et al., 2003, 156994; Zanobetti and Schwartz,
2007, 091247). Results from these studies are summarized in Figure 7-1. The ambient PM
concentrations from these studies are characterized in Table 7-2.
Coronary Heart Disease
Epidemiologic studies examining the association of coronary heart disease (CHD) with
long-term PM exposure are discussed below (Hoffmann et al., 2006, 091162; Maheswaran et
al., 2005, 090769; Miller et al., 2007, 090130; Rosenlund et al., 2006, 089796; Rosenlund et
al., 2009, 190309; Zanobetti and Schwartz, 2007, 091247). Cases of CHD were variably
defined in these studies to include history of angina pectoris, MI, coronary artery
revascularization (bypass graft; angioplasty! stent; atherectomy), and congestive heart
failure (CHF). Results pertaining to death from CHD are described in Section 7.6.
Miller et al. (2007, 090130) studied incident, validated MI, revascularization, and
CHD death, both separately and collectively, among 58,610 post-menopausal female
residents of 36 U.S. metropolitan areas (age range = 50-79 yr) enrolled in the Women's
Health Initiative Observational Study (WHI OS, 1994-1998). In this prospective cohort
study of participants free of CVD at baseline (median duration of follow-up = 6 yr), the
authors used arithmetic averaging of year 2000 EPAAQS PM2.5 data available at the
monitor nearest to each participant's geocoded U.S. Postal Service five-digit ZIP code
centroid to estimate one-yr avg exposures. They found 6% (95% CP -15% to 34%), 20% (95%
CP 0-43%) and 21% (95% CP 4-42%) increases in the overall risk of MI, revascularization,
and their combination with CHD death per 10 pg/m3 increase in PM2 .5, respectively. Hazards
were higher within than between cities and in the obese. For the combined CVD outcome
(MI, revascularization, stroke, CHD death, cerebrovascular disease), authors reported a
24% (95% CP 9-41%) increase in risk that was higher among participants at higher than
lower quintiles of body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist circumference. The
PM2.5-CVD association was stronger among non-diabetic than diabetic participants.
Puett et al. (2008, 156891) studied incident, validated CHD, CHD death, and non-
fatal MI among 66,250 female residents (mean age = 62 years) of metropolitan statistical
areas in thirteen northeastern U.S. states who were enrolled in the Nurses' Health Study
(NHS, 1992-2002). In this prospective cohort study of women without a history of non-fatal
MI at baseline (maximum duration of followup = 4 years), the authors used two-stage,
spatially smoothed, land use regression to estimate residence-specific, 1-yr ma PM10
exposures from U.S. EPAAQS and emissions, IMPROVE, and Harvard University monitor
data. They found a 10% (95% CP -6 to 29) increase in risk of first CHD event per 10 p/m3
increase in 1-yr avg PM10 exposure, while the association with MI was close to the null
value. The association with fatal CHD event of 30% (95% CP 0-71%) was stronger.
July 2009
7-19
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
Furthermore, associations with CHD death were higher in the obese and in the never
smokers.
Rosenlund et al. (2006, 089796) studied 2,938 residents of Stockholm County, Sweden
(age range = 45-70 years! 34% female). In this case-control study of 1,085 patients with
their first, validated non-fatal MI and an age-, gender- and catchment-stratified random
sample of 1,853 controls without MI (1992-1994), the authors used street canyon-adjusted
dispersion modeling of emissions data to estimate 30-yr avg exposure to PMio
(median = 2.4 pg/m3). They found that the OR for prevalent MI per 10 pg/m3 increase in
PMio was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.50-1.42). The OR for fatal MI was non-significantly elevated.
In a more recent study, Rosenlund et al. (2009, 190309) evaluated 554,340 residents
(age range = 15-79 years! 49% female) of Stockholm County, Sweden (1984-1996). In this
population-based, case-control study of 43,275 cases of incident, validated MI, the authors
used dispersion modeling of traffic emissions and land use data to estimate 5-yr avg
exposure to PMio. They found that after adjustment for demographic, temporal, and
socioeconomic characteristics, the OR for MI per 5 pg/m3 increase in PMio was 1.04 (95% CP
1.00-1.09). ORs were higher after restriction to fatal cases, in- or out-of-hospital deaths, and
participants who did not move between population censuses. Authors state that control for
confounding was superior in their previous study (Rosenlund et al., 2006, 089796) although
the size of the population was larger in this recent study (Rosenlund et al., 2009, 190309).
Zanobetti and Schwartz (2007, 091247) studied ICD-coded recurrent MI (ICD-9 410)
and post-infarction CHF (ICD-9 428) among 196,131 Medicare recipients (age > 65 years!
50% female) discharged alive following MI hospitalization in 21 cities from 12 U.S. states
(1985-1999). In this ecologic, open cohort study of re-hospitalization among MI survivors
(mean duration of followup = 3.6 and 3.7 years for MI and CHF, respectively), the authors
used arithmetic averaging of EPAAQS PMio data available in the county of hospitalization
to estimate one-yr avg exposures. They found 17% (95% CP 5-31%) and 11% (95% CP 3-
21%) increases in the risk of recurrent MI and post-infarction CHF, respectively, per
10 pg/m3 increase in PMio exposure. Hazards were somewhat higher among persons aged
>75 years.
Hoffmann et al. (2006, 091162) studied self-reported CHD (MI or revascularization)
among 3,399 residents of Essen and Mulheim, Germany (age range = 45-75 years! 51%
female) at the baseline exam of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study (2000-2003) introduced
previously. In this cross-sectional ancillary study, the authors used dispersion modeling of
emissions, climate and topography data to estimate 1-yr avg exposure to PM2.5
(mean = 23.3 pg/m3). They found little evidence of an association between PM2.5 and CHD in
these data. After adjustment for geographic, demographic and clinical characteristics, the
OR for prevalent CHD per 10 pg/m3 increase in exposure was 0.55 (95% CP 0.14-2.11).
July 2009
7-20
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Avg
Time
Risk Estimate
PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDIES
Miller et al.(2007, 090130)
1 yr
. Incident Ml
PM2.5
58,610 postmenopausal women enrolled in WHI,
incident, validated cases, 36 US cities
Revascularization
. Stroke
Cerebrovascular Disease
, All CVD
Puett et al. (2008,156891)
1 yr
1st CHD Event
PM11
75,809 women in the Nurses Health Study,
validated cases, 13 metro areas, NE states
CASE CONTROL STUDIES
Rosenlund et al. (2009,190309)
5 yr
. Fatal/Non-Fatal Ml
PM10
24,347 cases, l\l-276,926 randomly selected
population based controls, Stockholm, Sweden
Rosenlund et al. (2006, 089796)
30 yr
, Fatal/Non-Fatal Ml
2,246 cases, N-3,206 randomly selected
population controls, Stockholm, Sweden
Baccarelli et al. (2008,157984)
1 yr
, DVT
871 cases, N -1210 healthy friend controls,
Lombardy, Italy
OTHER STUDY DESIGNS
PM2.5
Hoffman et al. (2006, 091162)
1 yr
. Self-reported CHD
Hoffman et al. (2009,190376)
1 yr
_Self-reported PVD
Prevalent cases at baseline in 3,399 residents,
cross-sectional, 2 German cities
Zanobetti and Schwartz (2007, 091247)
1 yr
^Recurrent Ml Hospitalization
PM10
196,131 Ml survivors (ICD9 410), readmitted for
Ml or CHF, ecologic, open cohort, 21 US cities
Post-MI CHF Hospitalization
Maheswaran et al. (2005, 090769; 2005, 088683) 5 yr
_CHD Hospitalization
Hospital admissions among 199,682 residents,
ecologic design, Sheffield, UK
Stroke Hospitalization
I I I I I I II I I I I I I II I I I I I II
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.8 1.8 2.0 22 2.4
Risk estimates for the associations of clinical outcomes with long-term exposure to
ambient PM2.5 and PM10.
Figure 7-1.
1 In the study of 1030 census enumeration districts in Sheffield, U.K. described
2 previously, Maheswaran et al. (2005, 090769) studied 11,407 ICD-10-coded emergency
3 hospitalizations for CHD (ICD10 120-25) among 199,682 residents (age > 45 years! 45%
4 female). In this ecologic study, the authors used dispersion modeling of emissions and
5 climate data to estimate 5-yr avg exposure to PM10. They found that after adjusting for
July 2009
7-21
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
smoking prevalence, controlling for socioeconomic factors, and smoothing, the age- and
gender-standardized rate ratios for CHD admission were 1.01 (95% CI: 0.92-1.11), 1.04
(95% CI: 0.93-1.15), 0.97 (95% CI: 0.87-1.08), and 1.07 (95% CI: 0.95-1.20) across PMio
quintiles. The linear trend was somewhat stronger for CHD mortality (see Section 7.3).
The study of post-menopausal women enrolled in the WHI OS by Miller et al. (2007,
090130) was the only U.S. study to examine the effect of PM2.5 rather than PM10. This
study, which provides strong evidence of an association, was distinguished by its
prospective cohort design, validation of incident cases and large population. Puett et al.
(2008, 156891), the other U.S. study with comparable design features, provides evidence of
an association of incident CHD with long- term PM10 exposure. Findings from Swedish case
control studies of incident validated cases of MI were not consistent. A cross-sectional study
of self-reported CHD did not provide evidence of an association with PM2.5, while findings
from two ecologic studies of PM10 indicated positive associations of CHD hospitalizations
with PM10 (Maheswaran et al., 2005, 088683; Zanobetti and Schwartz, 2007, 091247).
Stroke
Miller et al. (2007, 090130) found 28% (95% CI: 2-61%) and 35% (95% CI: 8-68%)
increases in the overall risk of validated stroke and cerebrovascular disease, respectively,
per 10 pg/m3 increase in one-yr avg PM2.5 exposure. Risks were higher within than between
cities. In the study of 1030 Census of enumeration districts in Sheffield, U.K. described
previously, Maheswaran et al. (2005, 088683) studied 5,122 ICD-10-coded emergency
hospital admissions for stroke (160-69) among 199,682 residents (age > 45 yr! 45% female)
of 1,030 census enumeration districts in Sheffield, U.K. (1994-1999). In this ecologic study,
the authors used dispersion modeling of emissions and climate data to estimate five-yr avg
exposure to PM10. They found that the age- and gender-standardized rate ratios for stroke
admission were 1.05 (95% CI: 0.94-1.17), 1.07 (95% CI: 0.95-1.20), 1.06 (95% CI: 0.94-1.20),
and 1.15 (95% CI: 1.01-1.31) across PM10 quintiles. Linear trend was somewhat stronger for
stroke mortality (see Section 7.6).
These studies examining the long-term PM-stroke relationship provide evidence of
association. Maheswaran et al. (2005, 088683) examined emergency room HAs in Sheffield,
U.K. using an ecologic design while results reported by Miller et al. (2007, 090130) are
based on the prospective cohort study of the WHI OS population (both introduced
previously).
Peripheral Arterial Disease
The German Heinz Nixdorf Recall cross-sectional study described in Section 7.2.1.1
(Hoffmann et al., 2009, 190376) also evaluated the association between one-yr avg exposure
to PM2.5 and peripheral arterial disease (self-reported history of a surgical or procedural
intervention or an ABI <0.9 in one or both legs). The authors found no evidence of an
July 2009
7-22
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
increase in risk. The OR for peripheral arterial disease was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.57-1.34) per 3.9
pg/m3 increase in PM2.5. However, evidence of an association with traffic exposure was
present in these data. ORs of 1.77 (95% CI: 1.01-3.10), 1.02 (95% CI: 0.58-1.80), and 1.07
(95% CI: 0.68-1.68) for residing < 50, 50-100, and 100-200 m of a major road (reference
category: >200 m), respectively were observed. ORs were higher among participants with
CAC scores < 75th percentile, women, and smokers.
Deep Vein Thrombosis
The Italian case-control study (introduced in Section 7.2.1.2) also examined the
chronic PMicrDVT association (Baccarelli et al., 2008, 157984). The authors found a 70%
(95% CI: 30-223%) increase in the odds of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) per 10 pg/m3 increase
in one-yr avg PM10 exposure. This finding was consistent with the decreases in PT and PTT
also observed among controls in this context as well as the 47% (95% CI: 11*96%) increase
in the odds of DVT per inter-decile range (242 m) increase in the residence-to-major-
roadway distance observed among a subset of cases and controls (Baccarelli et al., 2009,
188183). The PMicrDVT and distance-DVT associations were both weaker among women
and among users of oral contraceptives or hormone therapy.
7.2.10. Cardiovascular Mortality
New epidemiologic evidence reports a consistent association between long-term
exposure to PM2.5 and increased risk of cardiovascular mortality. There is little evidence for
the long-term effects of PM10-2.5 on cardiovascular mortality. This section focuses on
cardiovascular mortality outcomes in response to long-term exposure to PM. The studies
that investigate long-term exposure and mortality due to any specific or all (non-accidental)
causes are evaluated in Section 7.6. A summary of the mean PM concentrations reported for
the studies characterized in this section is presented in Table 7-8, and the effect estimates
are presented in Figures 7-7 and 7-8.
A number of large, U.S. cohort studies have found consistent associations between
long-term exposure to PM2.5 and cardiovascular mortality. The American Cancer Society
(ACS) (Pope et al. 2004, 055880) reported positive associations with deaths from specific
cardiovascular diseases, particularly ischemic heart disease, and a group of cardiac
conditions including dysrhythmia, heart failure and cardiac arrest (RR for cardiovascular
mortality = 1.12 [95% CI: 1.08-1.15] per 10 |ug/m3 PM2.5). In an additional reanalysis that
extended the follow-up period for the ACS cohort to 18 years (1982-2000) (Krewski et al.,
2009, 191193), investigators found effect estimates that were similar, though generally
higher, than those reported in previous ACS analyses.
A follow-up to the Harvard Six Cities study (Laden et al., 2006, 087605) used updated
air pollution and mortality data and found positive associations between long-term
July 2009
7-23
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
exposure to PM2.5 and mortality. Of special note is a statistically significant reduction in
mortality risk reported with reduced long-term fine particle concentrations. This reduced
mortality risk was observed for deaths due to cardiovascular and respiratory causes, but
not for lung cancer deaths.
The WHI cohort study (Miller et al., 2007, 090130) (described previously) found that
each 10 |ug/m3 increase of PM2.5 was associated with a 76% increase in the risk of death
from cardiovascular disease (hazard ratio, 1.76 [95% CP 1.25-2.47]). The WHI study not
only confirms the ACS and Six City Study associations with cardiovascular mortality in yet
another well characterized cohort with detailed individual-level information, it also has
been able to consider the individual medical records of the thousands of WHI subjects over
the period of the study. This has allowed the researchers to examine not only mortality, but
also related morbidity in the form of heart problems (cardiovascular events) experienced by
the subjects during the study. These morbidity co*associations with PM2.5 in the same
population lend even greater support to the biological plausibility of the air pollution-
mortality associations found in this study.
In an analysis for the Seventh-Day Adventist cohort in California (AHSMOG), a
positive, association with coronary heart disease mortality was reported among females (92
deaths! RR = 1.42 [95% CP 1.06-1.90] per 10 |ug/m3 PM2.5), but not among males (53 deaths!
RR = 0.90 [95% CP 0.76-1.05] per 10 |ug/m3 PM2.5) (Chen et al., 2005, 087942). Associations
were strongest in the subset of postmenopausal women (80 deaths! RR = 1.49 [95% CP 1.17-
1.89] per 10 |ug/m3 PM2.5). The authors speculated that females maybe more sensitive to air
pollution-related effects, based on differences between males and females in dosimetry and
exposure. As was found with fine particles, a positive association with coronary heart
disease mortality was reported for PM10-25 and PM10 among females (RR = 1.38 [95% CP
0.97-1.95] per 10 |ug/m3 PM10-2&RR = 1.22 [95% CP 1.01-1.47] per 10 |u,g/m3 PM10), but not
for males (RR = 0.92 [95% CP 0.66-1.29] per 10 jug/m3 PMio-2&RR = 0.94 [95% CP 0.82-1.08]
per 10 |ug/m3 PM10); associations were strongest in the subset of postmenopausal women
(80 deaths) (Chen et al., 2005, 087942).
Two additional studies explored the effects of PM10 on cardiovascular mortality. The
Nurses' Health Study (Puett et al., 2008, 156891) is an ongoing prospective cohort study
examining the relation of chronic PM10 exposures with all-cause mortality and incident and
fatal coronary heart disease consisting of 66,250 female nurses in MSAs in the northeastern
region of the U.S. The association with fatal CHD occurred with the greatest magnitude
when compared with other specified causes of death (hazard ratio 1.42 [95% CP 1.11-1.81]).
The North Rhine-Westphalia State Environment Agency (LUANRW) initiated a cohort of
approximately 4,800 women, and assessed whether long-term exposure to air pollution
originating from motorized traffic and industrial sources was associated with total and
cause-specific mortality (Gehring et al., 2006, 089797). They found that cardiopulmonary
mortality was associated with PM10 (RR = 1.52 [95% CP 1.09-2.15] per 10 |u,g/m3 PM10).
July 2009
7-24
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
In summary, the 2004 PM AQCD concluded that there was strong evidence that long-
term exposure to PM2.5 was associated with increased cardiopulmonary mortality Recent
studies investigating cardiovascular mortality provide some of the strongest evidence for a
cardiovascular effect of PM. A number of large cohort studies have been conducted
throughout the U.S. and reported consistent increases in cardiovascular mortality related
to PM2.5 concentrations. The results of two of these studies have been replicated in
independent reanalyses. These effects are biologically plausible and coherent with
epidemiologic and toxicological studies of short-term exposure and CVD morbidity and
mortality and long-term exposure to PM2.5 and CVD morbidity.
7.2.11. Summary and Causal Determinations
7.2.11.1. PM2.5
Epidemiologic studies examining associations between long-term exposure to ambient
PM (over months to years) and CVD morbidity had not been conducted and thus were not
included in the 1996 or 2004 PM AQCDs (U.S. EPA, 1996, 079380; U.S. EPA, 2006, 157071).
A number of studies were included in the 2004 AQCD that evaluated the effect of long-term
PM2.5 exposure on cardiovascular mortality and found strong and consistent associations.
No toxicological studies had evaluated the effects of subchronic or chronic PM exposure on
CVD outcomes in the 2004 PM AQCD. Recently, epidemiologic and toxicological studies
have provided evidence of the adverse effects of long-term exposure to PM2.5 on
cardiovascular outcomes, including atherosclerosis and clinical and subclinical markers of
cardiovascular morbidity.
The strongest evidence for a CVD health effect related to long-term PM2.5 exposure
comes from epidemiologic studies of cardiovascular mortality. A number of large, multicity
U.S. studies (the ACS, Six Cities Study, WHI, and AHSMOG) provide consistent evidence of
an effect between long-term exposure to PM2.5 and cardiovascular mortality (Section 7.2.10).
These studies were conducted in urban areas across the U.S. where mean concentrations
ranged from 10.2-29.0 |ug/m3 (Table 7-8). An epidemiologic study investigating the
relationship between PM2.5 and clinical CVD morbidity among post-menopausal women
(Miller et al., 2007, 090130) provides evidence of an effect that is coherent with the
cardiovascular mortality studies. This large, prospective cohort study of incident, validated
cases found large increases in the adjusted risk of MI, revascularization, and stroke using a
1-yr avg PM2.5 concentration (mean = 13.5 pg/m3). Across-sectional analyses of self-reported
prevalence of CHD and peripheral arterial disease found no such increase in the odds of
CVD morbidity (Hoffmann et al., 2006. 091162); the inconsistency of these findings with
Miller et al. (2007, 090130) may be explained by differences in study design or location.
July 2009
7-25
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
The effect of long-term PM2.5 exposure on pre-clinical measures of atherosclerosis
(CIMT, CAC, AAC or ABI) has been studied in several populations using a cross-sectional
study design. The magnitude of the PM2.5 effects and their consistency across different
measures of atherosclerosis in these studies varies widely, and they may be limited in their
ability to discern small changes in these measures. Kunzli et al. (2005, 087387) observed a
non-significant 4.2% increase in CIMT associated with long-term PM2.5 exposure among
participants of a clinical trial in greater Los Angeles, which was several fold higher than
the 0.5% increase observed by Diez-Roux et al. (2008, 156401) in their analyses of MESA
baseline data. The associations in MESA of CAC and ABI with long-term PM2.5 exposure
were largely null (Diez Roux et al., 2008, 156401), while an increase in AAC with long-term
PM2.5 exposure was reported (Chang et al., 2008, 180393). By contrast, a 43% increase in
CAC was associated with long-term PM2.5 exposure in a German study but no similar
association with ABI was observed (Hoffmann et al., 2009, 190376). Although the number of
studies examining these relationships is limited, effect modification by use of
hyperlipidemics and smoking status was reported in more than one study of long-term PM
exposure.
Evidence of enhanced atherosclerosis development was demonstrated in new
toxicological studies that demonstrate increased plaque and lesion areas, lipid deposition,
and TF in aortas of ApoE '" mice exposed to CAPs (Section 7.2.1.2). In addition, alterations
in vasoreactivity were observed, suggesting an impaired NO pathway. Additional
toxicological studies of PM10 are consistent with these results. Further support is provided
by a study that reported decreased LAV ratio in the pulmonary and coronary arteries of
mice exposed to ambient air. However, PM2.5 CAPs derived from traffic in Los Angeles did
not affect plaque size (Araujo et al., 2008, 156222). Collectively, these toxicological studies
provide biological plausibility for the small effects observed in epidemiologic studies.
There is limited evidence for the effects of PM2.5 on renal or vascular function. Cross-
sectional and longitudinal epidemiologic analyses of PM2.5 and UACR revealed no evidence
of an effect (O'Neill et al., 2007, 156006) while small non-statistically significant increases
in BP with 30- and 60-day avg PM2.5 concentrations were reported (Auchincloss et al., 2008,
156234). A toxicological study did not show changes in MAP with CAPs, but indicated a
CAPs-related potentiation of experimentally-induced hypertension (Sun et al., 2008,
157032). In addition, CAPs has induced changes in insulin resistance, visceral adiposity,
and inflammation in a diet-induced obesity mouse model (Sun et al., 2009, 190487),
indicating that diabetics may be a potentially susceptible population to PM exposure.
In summary, a number of large U.S. cohort studies report associations of long-term
PM2.5 concentration with cardiovascular mortality. These studies provide the strongest
evidence for an effect of long-term PM2.5 exposure on CVD effects. Additional evidence
comes from a methodologically rigorous epidemiology study that demonstrates coherent
associations between long-term PM2.5 exposure and CVD morbidity among post-menopausal
July 2009
7-26
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
women. Toxicological studies demonstrate that this effect is biologically plausible and the
effect is coherent with studies of short-term PM2.5 exposure and CVD morbidity and
mortality and with long-term exposure to PM2.5 and CVD mortality. Associations between
PM2.5 and subclinical measures of atherosclerosis are inconsistent, but cross-sectional
studies may be limited in their ability to discern small changes in these measures. In
addition, potential modification of the PM2.5-CVD association by smoking status and the use
of anti-hyperlipidemics has been demonstrated in epidemiologic studies that used
individual-level data. Toxicological studies provide evidence for accelerated development of
atherosclerosis in ApoE"'" mice exposed to CAPs and show effects on coagulation factors,
experimentally-induced hypertension, and vascular reactivity. Available studies of clinical
cardiovascular disease outcomes report inconsistent results. Based on the above findings,
the epidemiologic and toxicological evidence is sufficient to infer a causal relationship
between long-term PM2.5 exposures and cardiovascular effects.
7.2.11.2. PM10-2.5
One epidemiologic study evaluated the relationship between long-term exposure to
PM10-2.5 and cardiovascular mortality and found a positive association with coronary heart
disease mortality among females, but not for males! associations were strongest in the
subset of postmenopausal women (Chen et al., 2005, 087942). No toxicological studies of
long-term exposure to ambient PM10-2.5 and cardiovascular effects have been conducted to
date. Evidence is inadequate to infer the presence or absence of a causal relationship.
7.2.11.3. Ultrafine PM
A few toxicological studies of long-term exposure to ultrafine PM have been
conducted. Increased plaque size was reported in mice exposed to ultrafine CAPs derived
from traffic (Araujo et al., 2008, 156222). Studies of diesel and gasoline exhaust reported
relatively few changes in hematologic or coagulation parameters (Section 7.2.4.2) and one
DE study demonstrated altered cardiac gene expression in normotensive rats that reflected
the development of hypertension (Gottipolu et al., 2009, 190360). Whole and filtered
gasoline exhaust induced increases in gene products involved in atheromatous plaque
formation and/or degradation, but these effects were largely due to the gaseous emissions
(Lund et al., 2007, 125741). Evidence from these studies alone is inadequate to infer the
presence or absence of a causal relationship due to a few studies being conducted without
gaseous co-pollutants.
July 2009
7-27
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
7.3. Respiratory Effects
Several cohort studies reviewed in the 2004 PM AQCD provided evidence for
relationships between long-term PM exposure and effects on the respiratory system, though
it did not rule out the possibility that the observed respiratory effects may have been
confounded by other pollutants. In 12 southern California communities in the Children's
Health Study (CHS), Gauderman et al. (2000, 012531; 2002, 026013) found that decreases
in lung function growth among schoolchildren were associated with long-term exposure to
PM. Declines in pulmonary function were reported with all three major PM size classes -
PMio, PMio-2.5 and PM2.5 - though the three PM measures were highly correlated. In
another analysis of data from the CHS cohort, McConnell et al. (1999, 007028). reported an
increased risk of bronchitis symptoms in children living in communities with higher PM10
and PM2.5 concentrations. These results were found to be consistent with results of cross-
sectional analyses of the 24-cities study by Dockery et al. (1996, 077269) and Raizenne et
al. (1996, 077268), that were assessed in the 1996 PM AQCD. These studies reported
associations between increased bronchitis rates and decreased peak flow with fine particle
sulfate and fine particle acidity. However, the high correlation of PM10, acid vapor and NO2
precluded clear attribution of the bronchitis effects reported by McConnell et al. (1999,
007028) to PM alone. In a prospective cohort study among a subset of children in the CHS
(n = 110) who moved to other locations during the study period, Avol et al. (2001, 020552)
reported that those subjects who moved to areas of lower PM10 showed increased growth in
lung function compared with subjects who moved to communities with higher PM10
concentrations. Finally, the 2004 PM AQCD concluded that there was strong epidemiologic
evidence for associations between long-term exposures to PM2.5 and cardiopulmonary
mortality, though the respiratory effects were not separated from the cardiovascular effects
in this conclusion.
The 2004 PM AQCD (U.S. EPA, 2004, 056905) concluded that the evidence for an
association between long-term exposure to PM and respiratory effects may be confounded
by other pollutants. Gauderman et al. (2002, 026013) reported declines for FEVi and
McConnell et al. (1999, 007028) reported increased ORs for bronchitic symptoms in
asthmatics for PM10 and PM2.5. Recent epidemiologic literature includes results from
several prospective cohort studies, which found consistent, positive associations between
long-term exposure to PM and respiratory morbidity. Associations were reported with PM2.5
and PM10, and the studies showing associations only with PM10 were conducted in locations
where the PM was predominantly fine particles, providing support for associations with
long-term exposure to fine particles. These results are summaraized below! further details
of these studies are summarized in Annex E.
Very few subchronic and chronic toxicological studies investigating respiratory effects
were available in the 2004 PM AQCD. However, the 2002 EPA Health Assessment
July 2009
7-28
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Document for DE reported that chronic exposure to DE was associated with histopathology
including alveolar histiocytosis, aggregation of alveolar macrophages, tissue inflammation,
increased polymorphonuclear leukocytes, hyperplasia of bronchiolar and Type 2 epithelial
cells, thickened alveolar septa, edema, fibrosis, emphysema and lesions of the trachea and
bronchi. Since then a number of animal toxicological studies have been conducted involving
inhalation exposure to CAPs, urban air, DE, gasoline exhaust, and woodsmoke. These
subchronic and chronic studies provide evidence of altered pulmonary function,
inflammation, histopathological changes and oxidative and allergic responses following
PM2.5 exposures. These results are summarized below! further details of these studies are
summarized in Annex D.
7.3.1. Respiratory Symptoms and Disease Incidence
7.3.1.1. Epidemiologic Studies
New longitudinal cohort studies provide the best evidence to evaluate the relationship
between long-term exposure to ambient PM and increased incidence of respiratory
symptoms or disease. A summary of the mean PM concentrations reported for the long-term
exposure studies characterized in this section is presented in Table 7-3.
Bayer-Oglesby et al. (2005, 086245) examined the decline of ambient pollution levels
and improved respiratory health demonstrated by a reduction in respiratory symptoms and
diseases in school children (n = 9,591) in Switzerland. Reduced air pollution exposure
resulted in improved respiratory health of children. Further, the average reduction of
symptom prevalence was more pronounced in areas with stronger reduction of air pollution
levels. The average decline of PM10 between 1993 and 2000 across the nine study regions
was 9.8 |ug/m3 (29%). Declining levels of PM10 were associated with declining prevalence of
chronic cough, bronchitis, common cold, nocturnal dry cough, and conjunctivitis symptoms,
but no significant associations were reported for wheezing, sneezing, asthma, and hay fever,
as shown in Figure 7*2. In Figure 7-2, Panel (B) illustrates that on an aggregate level
across region, the mean change in adjusted prevalence of chronic cough is associated with
the mean change in PM10 levels (r = 0.78; p = 0.02). Similar associations were seen for
nocturnal dry cough and conjunctivitis symptoms and PM10 levels. Roosli et al. (2000,
010296; 2001, 108738; 2005, 156923) have demonstrated that PM10 levels are
homogeneously distributed within regions of Basel, Switzerland and are not significantly
affected by local traffic, justifying the single-monitor approach for assignment of PM10
exposures. Based on parallel measurements of PM2.5 and PM10 at seven sites in
Switzerland, PM2.5 and PM10 at all sites are generally highly correlated (r2 ranging from
0.85 to 0.98 for the seven cities) (Gehrig and Buchmann, 2003, 139678), indicating that
PM10 is predominantly fine particles in these locations.
July 2009
7-29
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Schindler et al. (2009, 191950) reported that sustained reduction in ambient PMio
concentrations can lead to decreases in respiratory symptoms among Swiss adults in the
SAPALDLIA study. They compared baseline data in 1991 to a follow-up interview in 2002
after a substantial decline in PMio concentrations served as a natural experiment. Each
subject was assigned model-based estimates of PMio concentrations averaged over the 12
months preceding each health assessment with mean decline in PMio levels of 6.2 ug/m3
(SD = 3.9 |ug/m3). When the authors tested the joint hypothesis of no association between
the PMio difference and symptom incidence or persistence, positive results were obtained
for regular cough, chronic cough or phlegm and wheezing but not regular phlegm or
wheezing without a cold.
Pierse et al. (2006, 088757) studied the association between primary PMio (particles
directly emitted from local sources/traffic) and the prevalence and incidence of respiratory
symptoms in a randomly sampled cohort of 4,400 children (aged 1-5 years) in
Leicestershire, England surveyed in 1998 and again in 2001. Annual exposure to primary
PMio was calculated for the home address using the Airviro statistical dispersion model.
After adjusting for confounders, mean annual exposure to locally generated PMio was
associated with an increased prevalence of cough without a cold in both the 1998 (OR 1.21
[95% CI: 1.07-1.38], n = 2164) and 2001 surveys (OR 1.56 [95% CI: 1.32-1.84], n = 1756).
Nordling et al. (2008, 097998) examined the relationship between estimated PM
exposure levels and respiratory health effects in a Swedish birth cohort (n = 4089) of
preschool children. The spatial distributions of PM from traffic in the study area were
estimated with emission databases and statistical dispersion modeling. Children were
examined at 2 months and 1, 2, and 4 years of age. Using GIS methods, the average
contribution of traffic-generated PMio above regional background to the children's
residential outdoor air pollution levels was determined. To evaluate the exposure
assessment, the authors compared the estimated levels of traffic-generated PMio with PM2.5
measurements from 42 locations (Hoek et al., 2002, 042364) and reported modeled traffic-
generated PMio correlated reasonably well with measured PM2.5 (r = 0.61). Persistent
wheezing (cumulative incidence up to age 4) was associated with exposure to traffic-
generated PMio (OR 2.28 [95% CP 0.84-6.24] per 10 pg/m3 increase) while transient and
late onset wheezing was not associated. This study demonstrates that respiratory effects
may be present in preschool children.
July 2009
7-30
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table 7-3. Characterization of ambient PM concentrations from studies of respiratory
symptoms/disease and long-term exposures.
Reference
Location
Mean Annual Concentration (jjg/m3)
Upper Percentile
Concentrations
(|jg/m3>
PM2.5
Annesi Maesano et al. (2007, 093180)
6 French Cities
Range of means across sites: 8.7-23.0
Avg of means across sites: 15.5
Braueret al. (2007, 090691)
The Netherlands
16.9
75th: 18.1
90th: 19.0
Max: 25.2
Goss et al. (2004, 055624)
U.S.
13.7
75th: 15.9
Islam et al. (2007, 090697)
12 CHS/CA communities
Max: 29.5
Janssen et al. (2003,133555)
The Netherlands
20.5
75th: 22.1
Max: 24.4
Kim et al. (2004,087383)
San Francisco, CA
Range of means across sites: 11-15
Avg of means across sites: 12
McConnell et al. (2003, 049490)
12 CHS/CA communities
13.8
Max: 28.5
Morgenstern et al. (2008,156782)
Munich, Germany
11.1
PM,o
BaverOglesbv et al. (2005, 086245)
Nine study regions in Switzerland
Max: 46
Kunzli et al. (2009,191949)
Switzerland
21.5
Nord ling et al. (2008, 097998)
Sweden
4*
Schin dler et al. (2009,191950)
Switzerland
McConnell et al. (2003, 049490)
12 CHS/CA communities
30.8
Max: 63.5
Pierse et al. (2006, 088757)
Leicestershire,U.K.
1.33
75th: 1.84
"Source specific; PM10 from traffics
July 2009
7-31
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
0
t
1
f")
f
I
5
1.5
1.4 —|
1.3
1.2 H
1.1
1.0
0.9-
o.e
0.?
0 6 -
0.5 -
0.4 -
0.3-
0.2 —
0.1 -
0.0
_cF
*1
- / /
* * S J
{
0 g x
Is 1 S
¦c a w
m if?
1 1 o
ro O
Be.
-20 15 io ¦ r,
Mean change of annual
average PM10 (pg/m3)
T
0# ~ ~
/ / ^
«/
T~
#•
~
Source: Bayer Oglesby et al. (2005, 086245)
Figure 7-2. Adjusted ORs and 95% CIs of symptoms and respiratory diseases associated with a
decline of 10//g/m3 PM10 levels in Swiss Surveillance Program of Childhood Allergy
and Respiratory Symptoms1. Inset: Mean change in adjusted prevalence (1998-2001 to
1992-1993) versus mean change in regional annual averages of PM10 (1997-2000 to
1993) for chronic cough, across nine SCARPOL regions (An: Anieres. Be: Bern. Bi: Biel.
Ge: Geneva. La:, Langnau. Lu: Lugano. Mo: Montana. Pa: Payerne. Zh:
Zurich).
1 McConnell et al. (2003, 049490) conducted a prospective study examining the
2 association between air pollution and bronchitic symptoms in 475 school children with
3 asthma in 12 Southern California communities as part of the CHS from 1996 to 1999. They
4 investigated both the differences between- communities with 4-yr avg and within-
5 communities yearly variation in PM (i.e., PMio, PM2.5, PM10-2.5, EC, and OC). Based on a
6 10 pg/m3 change in PM2.5, within-communities effects were larger (OR 1.90 [95% CP 1.10-
7 2.70]) than those for between-communities (OR 1.30 [95% CP 1.10-1.50]). The OR for the
8 10 pg/m3 range in 4-yr avg PM2.5 concentrations across the 12 communities was 1.29 (95%
L Adjusted for age, sex, nationality, parental education, number of siblings! farming status, low birth weight, breastfeeding,
child who smokes, family history of asthma, bronchitis, and/or atopy, mother who smokes, indoor humidity, mode of heating
and cooking, carpeting, pets allowed in bedroom, removal of carpet and/or pets for health reasons, person who completed
questionnaire, month when questionnaire was completed, number of days with the maximum temperature <0°C, and belief
of mother that there is an association between environmental exposures and children's respiratory health
July 2009
7-32
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
CL 1.06-1.58). Similar results were reported for PMio and PM10-2.5 but the effect estimates
were smaller in magnitude and generally not statistically significant. Within-community
associations were not confounded by any time-fixed personal covariates. In two-pollutant
models, the within-community effect estimates for PM2.5 and OC were significant in the
presence of several other pollutants. While the within-community single-pollutant effect of
PM2.5 (13 = 0.085/pg/m3) was only modestly attenuated after adjusting for some pollutants, it
was markedly reduced after adjusting for NO2 or OC. The between-community effect
estimates generally were not significant in the presence of other pollutants in two-pollutant
models.
In the CHS already discussed, Islam et al. (2007, 090697) examined the hypothesis
that ambient air pollution attenuates the reduced risk for childhood asthma that is
associated with higher lung function (n = 2057). At each age a distribution of pulmonary
functions exists. Haland et al. (2006, 156511) found evidence that children with high lung
function have a reduced risk for asthma. Islam et al. (2007, 090697) used the CHS data to
study how the association of asthma incidence with lung function is modified by long-term
PM exposure. The incidence rate (IR) of newly diagnosed asthma increased from 9.5/1000
person-years for children with percent-predicted FEF25-75 values > 120% to 20.4/1000
person-years for children with FEF25-75 value < 100%. Over the 10th"90th percentile range
for FEF25-75 (57.1%), the hazard ratio of new onset asthma was 0.50 (95% CP 0.35-0.71). The
IR of asthma for FEF25-75> 120% in the "high" PM2.5 (13.7-29.5 jug/m3) communities was
15.9/1000 person-years compared to 6.4/1000 person-years in "low" PM2.5 (5.7-8.5 |ug/m3)
communities. Loss of protection by high lung function against new onset asthma in the
"high" PM2.5 communities was observed for all the lung function measures. Figure 7.3
shows the effect of PM2.5 on the association of lung function with asthma. Of all the
pollutants examined (NO2, PM10, PM2.5, acid vapor, O3, EC, and OC), PM2.5 appeared to
have the strongest modifying effect on the association between lung function with asthma
as it had the highest R2 value (0.42). Over the 10th-90th percentile range of FEF25-75, the
hazard ratio of new onset asthma was 0.34 (95% CP 0.21-0.56) in a community with low
PM2.5 (<13.7 pg/m3) and 0.76 (95% CP 0.45-1.26) in a community with high PM2.5
(> 13.7 pg/m3). The data do not indicate that PM exposure increased rates of incident
asthma among children with poor lung function at study entry because rates among those
with poor lung function were similar in both low and high pollution communities.
July 2009
7-33
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1.00
High PM2 5 - Communities
1.50-
UP
° 1.20-
Low PM25
Communities
ML
SD
0.90-
(8 ~
N
X 0.60 —J
¦o
w
LE
RV
LM
AT
BM
LB
r2 = 0.42
P = 0.01
AL
0.30 H
5 10 15 20 25 30
PM2,g(|jg/m3)
Source: Islam et al. (2007, 090697)
Figure 7-3. Effect of PM2.5 on the association of lung function with asthma. Community-specific
hazard ratio of newly diagnosed asthma over 10-90th percentile range (57.1%) of FEF25
75% by level of ambient PM2.5 ((Jg/m3). The 12 CHS communities are shown.
In a prospective birth cohort study (n = 4,000) in The Netherlands, Brauer et al.
(2007, 090691) assessed the development of asthma, allergic symptoms, and respiratory
infection during the first four years of life in relation to long-term PM2.5 concentration at
the home address with a validated model using GIS. PM2.5 was associated with doctor-
diagnosed asthma (OR = 1.32 [95% CP 1.04-1.69]) for a cumulative lifetime indicator. These
findings extend observations made at 2 years of age in the same cohort (Brauer et al., 2002,
035192) providing greater confidence in the association. No associations were observed for
bronchitis.
Kunzli et al. (2009, 191949) used the SAPALDIA cohort study discussed previously in
this section to evaluate the relationship between the 11-year change (1991-2002) in traffic-
related PM10 and asthma incidence-adult onset asthma. In a cohort of 2,725 never-smokers
without asthma at baseline (ages: 18-60 years in 1991), subjects reporting doctor-diagnosed
asthma at follow-up were considered incident cases. Modeled traffic-related PM10 levels
were used. Cox proportional hazard models for time to asthma onset were used with
adjustments for cofounders. The study findings suggest that PM contributes to asthma
development and that reductions in PM decrease asthma risk. A strong feature of
SAPALDIA is the ability to assign space, time, and source-specific pollution to each subject.
Further, Kunzli et al. (2008, 129258) discusses the impact of attributable health risk models
for exposures that are assumed to cause both chronic disease and its exacerbations. The
added impact of causing disease increases the risk compared to only exacerbations.
A matched case-control study of infant bronchiolitis (ICD 9 code 466.1) hospitalization
and two measures of long-term exposure - the month prior to hospitalization (subchronic)
and the lifetime average (chronic) - to PM2.5 and gaseous air pollutants in the South Coast
July 2009
7-34
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
Air Basin of southern California was conducted by Karr et al. (2007, 090719) among 18,595
infants born between 1995-2000. For each case, 10 controls matched on date were randomly
selected from birth records. Exposure was based on PM2.5 measurements collected every
third day. The mean distance between the subjects' residential ZIP code and the assigned
monitor was generally 4-6 miles with a maximum distance of 30 miles. For 10 pg/m3
increases in both sub-chronic and chronic PM2.5 exposure, an adjusted OR of 1.09 (95% CP
I.04-1.14) was observed. In multipollutant model analyses, the association with PM2.5 was
robust to the inclusion of gaseous pollutants. Also, in a cohort of children in Germany,
Morgenstern et al. (2008, 156782) modeled PM2.5 data at birth addresses found statistically
significant effects for asthmatic bronchitis, hay fever, and allergic senstation to pollen.
Goss et al. (2004, 055624) conducted a national study examining the relationship
between air pollutants and health effects in a cohort of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients (n =
II,484) over the age of 6 years (mean age = 18.4, SD = 10) enrolled in the Cystic Fibrosis
Foundation National Patient Registry in 1999 and 2000. Exposure was assessed by linking
air pollution values from the closest population monitor from the Air Quality System (AQS)
with the centroid of the patient's home ZIP code that was within 30 miles. The mean
distance from the patient's ZIP code to monitors for PM2.5 and PM10 was 10.8 miles (SD 7.8)
and 11.5 miles (SD 7.9), respectively. PM2.5 and PM10 24-h avg were collected every 1 to 12
days. CF diagnosis involves genetic screening panels and a common severe mutation used is
the loss of phenylalanine at the 508th position. Genotyping was available in 74% of the
population and of those genotyped, 66% carried one or more delta F508 deletions. After
adjusting for confounders, a 10 pg/m3 increase in PM2.5 or PMiowas associated with a 21%
(95% CP 7-33) or 8% (95% CP 2-15), respectively, increase in the odds of two or more
exacerbations defined as a CF-related pulmonary condition requiring admission to the
hospital or use of home intravenous antibiotics. The estimate for the associations between
pulmonary exacerbations and PM2.5 and PM10 were attenuated when the models were
adjusted for lung function. Brown et al. (2001, 012307) found that particle deposition was
increased in CF and that particle distribution in the lungs was enhanced in poorly
ventilated tracheobronchial regions in CF patients. Such focal deposition may partially
explain the association of PM and CF exacerbation.
Annesi-Maesano (2007, 093180) from 5,338 school children (10.4 ±0.7 years)
attending 108 randomly chosen schools in 6 French cities to the concentration of PM2.5
monitored in school yards. Atopic asthma was related to PM2.5 (OR 1.43 [95% CP 1.07-1.91])
when high PM2.5 concentrations (20.7 pg/m3) were compared to low PM2.5 concentrations
(8.7 pg/m3). The report is consistent with the results in an earlier paper (Penard'Morand et
al., 2005, 087951) in the same sample of children that related the findings to PM10.
Kim et al. (2004, 087383) conducted a school-based cross-sectional study in the San
Francisco metropolitan area in 2001 comprised of 10 neighborhoods to examine the
relationship between traffic-related pollutants and current bronchitic symptoms and
July 2009
7-35
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
asthma obtained by parental questionnaire (n = 1109). They related traffic-related
pollutants (PM) and bronchitic and asthma symptoms in the past 12 months. No
multipollutant models were evaluated because of the high interpollutant correlations. PM2.5
levels ranged across the school sites from 11 to 15 ug/m3.
Schikowski et al. (2005, 088637) examined the relationship between both long-term
air pollution exposure and living close to busy roads and COPD in the Rhine-Ruhr Basin of
Germany from 1985 to 1994 using consecutive cross-sectional studies. Seven monitoring
stations that were <8 km to a woman's home address provided TSP data that PM10 was
estimated from using a conversion factor (obtained from parallel measurement of TSP and
PM10 conducted at 7 sites in the Ruhr area). Distance to a major road was determined using
GIS. The results of the study suggest that long-term exposure to air pollution from PM10
and living near a major road might increase the risk of developing COPD and can have a
detrimental effect on lung function. All ORs for 5-yr exposures were stronger than those for
1-yr exposures.
In summary, the 2004 PM AQCD evaluated the available studies which primarily
related effects to bronchitic symptoms in school-age children. The new evidence is more
informative, as it includes longitudinal cohort studies that have been conducted in different
countries by different researchers that use different study designs. Some new studies are
using several different methods to include individual estimates of exposure to ambient PM
that may reduce the impact of exposure error. The strength and consistency of the outcomes
is enhanced by results being reported by several different researchers in different countries
using different designs. Most recent studies have focused on children, but a few studies
have also reported associations in adults.
The CHS (McConnell et al., 2003, 049490) provides evidence in a prospective
longitudinal cohort study that relates PM2.5 and bronchitic symptoms and reports larger
associations for within-community effects that are less subject to confounding than
between-community effects. Several new studies report similar findings with long-term
exposure to PM10 in areas where fine particles predominate PM10. In England, in a cohort of
4,400 children (aged 1-5), an association is seen with an increased prevalence of cough
without a cold. Further evidence includes a reduction of respiratory symptoms
corresponding to decreasing PM levels in "natural experiments" in both a cohort of Swiss
school children (Bayer-Oglesby et al., 2005, 086245) and adults (Schindler et al., 2009,
191950).
In a separate analysis of the CHS, Islam et al. (2007, 090697) showed that PM2.5 had
the strongest modifying effect on the association between lung function with asthma such
that loss of protection by high lung function against new onset asthma in high PM2.5
communities was observed for all the lung function measures from 10 to 18 years of age.
This relates new onset asthma to long-term PM exposure. In the Netherlands, Brauer et al.
(2007, 090691) augments the literature with data examining the first 4 years of life in a
July 2009
7-36
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
birth cohort showing an association with doctor-diagnosed asthma. Further, in an adult
cohort in the SALPALDIA study, Kunzli et al. (2009, 191949) relate PM to asthma
incidence.
7.3.2. Pulmonary Function
Several cohort studies reviewed in the 2004 PM AQCD provided evidence for
relationships between long-term PM exposure and effects on the respiratory system. In 12
southern California communities in the Children's Health Study (CHS), Gauderman et al.
(2000, 012531; 2002, 026013) found that decreases in lung function growth among school
children were associated with long-term exposure to PM. Declines in pulmonary function
were reported with all three major PM size classes - PMio, PM10-2.5 and PM2.5 - though the
three PM measures were highly correlated. These results were found to be consistent with
results of cross-sectional analyses of Raizenne et al. (1996, 077268), that was assessed in
the 1996 PM AQCD. That study reported associations between decreased peak flow with
fine particle sulfate and fine particle acidity. Finally, in a prospective cohort study among a
subset of children in the CHS (n = 110) who moved to other locations during the study
period, Avol et al. (2001, 020552) reported that those subjects who moved to areas of lower
PM10 showed increased growth in lung function compared with subjects who moved to
communities with higher PM10 concentrations who showed decrease growth in lung
function.
7.3.2.1. Epidemiologic Studies
New longitudinal cohort studies have evaluated the relationship between long-term
exposure to PM and changes in measures of pulmonary function (FVC, FEVi, and measures
of expiratory flow). Cross-sectional studies also offer supportive information (see Annex E)
and may provide insights derived from within community analysis. Lung function increases
continue through early adulthood with growth and development, then declines with aging
(Stanojevic et al., 2008, 157007; Thurlbeck, 1982, 093260; Zeman and Bennett, 2006,
157178). A summary of the mean PM concentrations reported for the long-term exposure
studies characterized in this section is presented in Table 7-4.
Table 7-4. Characterization of ambient PM concentrations from studies of FEVi and long-term
exposures.
Reference
Location
Mean Annual Upper Percentile
Concentration (ng/m3) Concentrations (ng/m3)
PM2.5
Gauderman et al. (2002, 026013)
12 CHS/CA communities
5-30
Gauderman et al. (2004, 056569)
12 CHS/CA communities
6-27
Goss et al. (2004, 055624)
U.S.
13.7 75th: 15.9
July 2009
7-37
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Reference
Location
Mean Annual
Concentration (ng/m3)
Upper Percentile
Concentrations (ng/m3)
Gotschi et al. (2008,180364)
21 European cities
Range of means across sites: 3.7-44.7
Avg of mean across sites: 16.8
PMm
Downs et al. (2007, 092853)
8 cities in Switzerland
Range of means across sites: 9-46
Avg of mean across sites: 21.6
Gauderman et al. (2002, 026013)
12 CHS/CA communities
Range of means across sites: 13-78
Avg of mean across sites: NR
Gauderman et al. (2004, 056569)
12 CHS/CA communities
Range of means across sites: 18-68
Avg of mean across sites: NR
Nordling et al. (2008, 097998)
Sweden
A vol et al. (2001,020552)
Southern CA/CHS
Rojas-Martinez (2007,188508)
Mexico City, Mexico
75.6
75th: 92.2
90th: 112.7
The CHS prospectively examined the relationship between air pollutants and lung
function (FVC, FEVi, MMEF) in a cohort (n = 1,759) of children between the ages of 10 and
18 years, a period of rapid lung development (Gauderman et al., 2004, 056569). Air
pollution monitoring stations provided data in each of the 12 study communities from 1994-
2000. The results for O3, PM10, NO2, PM2.5, acid vapor, and EC are depicted in Figure 7-4. In
general, two-pollutant models for any pair of pollutants did not provide a substantially
better fit to the data than the corresponding single-pollutant models due to the strong
correlation between most pollutants. The pollution-related deficits in the average growth in
lung function over the eight-yr period resulted in clinically important deficits in attained
lung function at the age of 18 years.
Downs et al. (2007, 092853) prospectively examined 9,651 randomly selected adults
(18-60 years of age) in 8 cities in Switzerland (see alsoAckermann-Liebrich et al., 1997,
077537) to ascertain the relationship between reduced exposure to PM10 and age-related
decline in lung function (FVC, FEVi, and FEF25-50). An evaluated statistical dispersion
model (Liu et al., 2007, 093093) provided spatially resolved concentrations of PM10 that
enabled assignment to residential addresses for the participant examinations in 1991 and
2002 that yielded a median decline of 5.3 |ug/m3 (IQR 4.1-7.5). Decreasing PM10
concentrations attenuated the decline in lung function. Effects were greater in tests
reflecting small airway function. No other pollutant relationships were evaluated, though a
related study indicated that levels of NO2 also declined over the same period (Ackermann-
Liebrich et al., 2005, 087826). Generalized cross-validation essentially chose a linear fit for
the the concentration-response curve for age-related decline in lung function.
These data show that improvement in air quality may slow the annual rate of decline
in lung function in adulthood indicating positive consequences for public health. Further
evidence on improvement in respiratory health with reduction in air pollution levels is
provided from studies conducted in East Germany related to dramatic emissions reductions
after the reunification in 1990 (Fryer and Collins, 2003, 156454; Heinrich et al., 2002,
July 2009
7-38
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
034825; Sugiri et al., 2006, 088760). This type of "natural experiment" provides additional
support for epidemiologic findings that relatively low levels of airborne particles have
respiratory effects.
In a prospective cohort study consisting of school-age children (n = 3,170) who were 8
years of age at the beginning of the study, had not been diagnosed with asthma, and were
located in Mexico City (Rojas-Martinez et al., 2007, 188508), evaluated the association
between long-term exposure to PMio, O3 and NO2 and lung function growth every 6 months
from April 1996 through May 1999. Exposure data were provided by 10 air quality monitor
stations located within 2 km of each child's school. The multipollutant model effect of PM10
over the age of 8 to 10 years of life in this cohort on FVC, FEVi, and FEF25-75 showed an
association. Single pollutant models showed an association between ambient pollutants (O3,
PM10 and NO2) and deficits in lung function growth. The association between PM10 and
FEF25-75 was not statistically significant. While the estimates from two-pollutant models
were not substantially different than single pollutant models, independent effects for
pollutants could not be estimated accurately because the traffic-related pollutants were
correlated. Although no PM2.5 data were presented in this study, Chow et al. (2002) in a
separate study report that for Mexico City during the winter of 1997 that approximately
50% of PM10 was in the PM2.5 fraction.
Gotschi et al. (2008, 156485) examined the relationship between air pollution and
lung function in adults in the European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS).
FEVi and FVC were assessed at baseline and after 9 years of follow-up from 21 European
centers (followed-up sample n = 5,610). No significant associations were found between city-
specific annual mean PM2.5 and average lung function levels which is in contrast to the
results seen by Ackermann-Liebrich (1997, 077537) (SAPALDIA) and Schikowski et al.
(2005, 088637) (SALIA) which compared across far more homogenous populations than for
the population assessed in the ECRHS. Misclassification and confounding may partially
explain the discrepancy in findings.
July 2009
7-39
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
H 10-1
I
g
R-0.04
P-0,89
~ LB
~ UP
SD
~ ML
~ RV
~ AT
~ SM ~ LM
~ AL
~ LE
<( LN
~ LA
25 35 45 55 65
Oj from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. (PPb}
75
J
OS
>
ID-
S'
.y 6-
2 <
0 4'
1 2.
oq 1
V
i
~ UP
R-0.66
P-0,02
~ 1
V
£
R-0.69
P-0,01
~ UP
~ SD
~ LN
4 6
Acid Vapor (ppb)
10
12
£. 10-
S
"5
>
R-0.74
P-0.006
~ LM
~ LN
~ UP
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.S 1.0
Elemental Carbon (f»g/m3)
1.2
1.4
Source: Adapted from Gauderman et al. (2004, 056569)
Figure 7-4. Proportion of 18-year olds with a FEVi below 80% of the predicted value plotted against
the average levels of pollutants from 1994 through 2000 in the 12 southern California
communities of the Children's Health Study (AL = Alpine; AT = Atascadero; LA = Lake
Arrowhead; LB = Long Beach; LE = Lake Elsinore; LM = Lompoc; Ll\l = Lancaster;
ML = Mira Loma; RV = Riverside; SD = San Dimas; SM = Santa Maria; UP = Uplannd.)
1 In a birth cohort (n = 2,170) in Oslo, Norway, Oftedal et al. (2008, 093202) examined
2 effects of exposure to PM2.5 and PMioon lung function (FVC, FEVi, FEFscm). Spirometry was
3 performed in 2,307 children aged 9-10 years old in 2001-2002. Residential air pollution
4 levels over the time period 1992-2002 were calculated using EPISODE dispersion models to
5 provide three time scales of exposure^ l) first year of life, 2) lifetime exposure, and 3) just
6 before the lung function test. Only single pollutant models were evaluated because air
7 pollutants were highly correlated (r = 0.83-0.95). PM exposure was associated with changes
8 in adjusted peak respiratory flow, especially in girls. No effect was found for forced volumes.
July 2009
7-40
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
Adjusting for contextual socioeconomic factors diminished associations. Results for PMio
were similar to those for PM2.5.
In an exploratory study, Mortimer et al. (2008, 187280) examined the association of
prenatal and lifetime exposure to air pollutants using geocoded monthly average PM10
levels with pulmonary function in a San Joaquin Valley, California cohort of 232 children
(aged 6" 11) with asthma. First and second trimester PM10 exposures (based on monthly
average concentrations) had a negative effect on pulmonary function and may relate to
prenatal exposures affecting the lungs as they begin to develop at 6 wk gestation.
Dales et al. (2008, 156378) in a cross-sectional prevalence study examined the
relationship of pulmonary function and PM measures, other pollutants, and indicators of
motor vehicle emissions in Windsor, Ontario, in a cohort of 2,402 school children. PM2.5 and
PM10 concentrations were estimated for each child's residence at the postal code level. Each
10 pg/m3 increase in PM2.5 was associated with a 7.0% decrease in FVC expressed in a
percentage of predicted.
In Leicester, England, investigators examined the carbon content of airway
macrophages in induced sputum in 64 of 114 healthy children 8 to 15 years of age (Grigg et
al., 2008, 156499; Kulkarni et al., 2006, 089257). The carbon content of airway
macrophages (Finch et al., 2002, 054603; Strom et al., 1990, 157020) was used as a marker
of individual exposure to PM10. Near each child's home, exposure to PM10 was estimated
using a statistical dispersion model (Pierse et al., 2006, 088757). The authors reported a
dose-dependent inverse association between the carbon content of airway macrophages and
lung function in children and found no evidence that reduced lung function itself causes an
increase in carbon content. Consistent results were obtained for both FVC and FEF25-75.
Caution should be used when interpreting these results as the accuracy of the estimates on
individual PM10 exposures were not validated! there is potential for confounding by ethnic
origin! and there is concern that the magnitude of the changes in pulmonary function
associated with increased particle area appear large (Boushey et al. 2008).
Nordling et al. (2008, 097998) discussed above in the respiratory symptoms section,
also reported that lower PEF at age 4 was associated with exposure to traffic-related PM10
(-8.93 L/min [95% CP -17.78 to -0.088]). Goss et al. (2004, 055624), discussed in the
respiratory symptoms section, found strong inverse relationships between FEVi and PM2.5
concentrations in both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.
In summary, recent studies have greatly expanded the evidence available for the 2004
PM. The earlier CHS studies followed young children for 2-4 years. New analyses have been
conducted that include longer follow-up periods of this cohort through 18 years of age
(considered early adulthood for lung development (Stanojevic et al., 2008, 157007) and
provide evidence that effects from exposure to PM2.5 persist into early adulthood.
Longitudinal studies follow effects over time and are considered to provide the best
evidence as opposed to studies across communities as in cross-sectional studies. The
July 2009
7-41
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
longitudinal cohort studies in the 2004 PM AQCD provided data for children in one location
in one study and new longitudinal studies have been conducted in other locations.
Gauderman et al. (2004, 056569) reported that PM2.5 exposure was associated with
clinically and statistically significant deficits in FEVi attained at the age of 18 years.
Clinical significance was defined as a FEVi below 80% of the predicted value, a criterion
commonly used in clinical settings to identify persons at increased risk for adverse
respiratory conditions. This clinical aspect is an important enhancement over the earlier
results reported in the 2004 PM AQCD. Further, the association reported in this study that
evaluated the 8-yr time period into early adulthood not only provided evidence for the
persistence of the effect, but in addition the strength and robustness of the outcomes were
more positive, larger, and more certain than previous CHS studies of shorter follow-up.
Supporting this result are new longitudinal cohort studies conducted by other
researchers in other locations with different methods. Though these studies report results
for PM10, available data discussed above indicate that the majority of PM10 is composed of
PM2.5U1 these areas. New studies provide positive results from Mexico City, Sweden, and a
national cystic fibrosis cohort in the U.S. One study reported null results in a European
cohort described as having potential misclassification and confounding concerns as well as
lacking a homogenous population potentially rendering the outcome as non-informative. A
natural experiment in Switzerland, where PM levels had decreased, reported that
improvement in air quality may slow the annual rate of decline in lung function in
adulthood, indicating positive consequences for public health. These natural experiments
are considered especially supportive.
The relationship between long-term PM exposure and decreased lung function is thus
seen during lung growth and lung development in school-age children into adulthood. At
adult ages studies continue to show a relationship between decreased lung function and
long-term PM exposure. Some newer studies attempting to study the relationship of long-
term PM exposure from birth through preschool are reporting a relationship. Thus, the
impact of long-term PM exposure is seen over the time period of lung function growth and
development and the decline of lung function with aging.
Overall, effect estimates from these studies are negative (i.e., indicating decreasing
lung function) and the pattern of effects are similar between the studies for FVC and FEVi.
Thus, the data are consistent and coherent across several designs, locations, and
researchers. With cautions noted, the results relating carbon content of airway
macrophages to decreased measures of pulmonary function add plausibility to the
epidemiologic findings. Some new studies are using individual estimates of exposure to
ambient PM to reduce the impact of exposure error (Downs et al., 2007, 092853; Jerrett et
al., 2005, 087381).
As was found in the 2004 PM AQCD, the studies report associations with PM2.5 and
PM10, while most did not evaluate PM10-2.5. Associations have been reported with fine
July 2009
7-42
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
particle components, particularly EC and OC. Source apportionment methods generally
have not been used in these long-term exposure studies. However, numerous studies have
evaluated exposures to PM related to traffic or motor vehicle sources. For example, Meng et
al. (2007, 093275) investigated the associations between traffic and outdoor pollution levels
and poorly controlled asthma among adults who were respondents to the California Health
Interview Survey and found associations for traffic density and PMio, but not PM2.5.
7.3.2.2. Toxicological Studies
Urban Air
An important new study evaluated the effects of chronic exposure to ambient levels of
urban particles on lung development in the mouse (Mauad et al., 2008, 156743). Both
functional and anatomical indices of lung development were measured. Male and female
BALB/c mice were continuously exposed to ambient or filtered Sao Paolo air for 8 months.
Concentrations in the "polluted chamber" vs. "clean chamber" were 16.8 vs. 2.9 ug/ma PM2.5.
Thus PM levels were reduced by filtration but not entirely eliminated. Ambient
concentrations of CO, NO2 and SO2 were 1.7 ppm, 89.4 jug/m3 and 8.1 |u,g/m3, respectively.
Concentrations of gaseous pollutants were assumed to be similar to ambient levels in both
chambers. After 4 months, the animals were mated and the offspring were divided into 4
groups to provide for a prenatal exposure group, a postnatal exposure group, a pre and
postnatal exposure group and a control group. Animals were sacrificed at 15 and 90 days of
age for histological analysis of lungs. Pulmonary pressure-volume measurements were also
conducted in the 90 day old offspring. Statistically significant reductions in inspiratory and
expiratory volumes were found in the pre and postnatal exposure group, but not in the
prenatal or postnatal exposure group, compared with controls. These changes in pulmonary
function correlated with anatomical changes which are discussed in Section 7.3.5.1.
Diesel Exhaust
Li et al. (2007, 155929) exposed BALB/c and C56BL/6 mice to clean air or to low dose
DE (at a PM concentration of 100 |u,g/m3) for 7 hs/day and 5 days/week for 1, 4 and 8 wk.
Average gas concentrations were reported to be 3.5 ppm CO, 2.2 ppm NO2, and less than
0.01 ppm SO2. AHR was evaluated by whole body plethysmography at Day 0 and after 1, 4
and 8 wk of exposure. Short-term responses are discussed in Section 6.3.2.3, 6.3.3.3 and
6.3.4.2. The increased sensitivity of airways to methacholine (measured as Penh) seen in
C57BL/6 but not BALB/c mice at 1 week was also seen at 4 wk but not at 8 wk. This study
suggests that adaptation occurs during prolonged DE exposure. Influx of inflammatory
cells, histopathology, markers of oxidative stress and effects of antioxidant intervention
were also evaluated (see Sections 7.3.3.2 and 7.3.4.1). Although no attempt was made in
this study to determine the effects of gaseous components of DE on the measured responses,
July 2009
7-43
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
concentrations of gases were very low suggesting that PM may have been responsible for
the observed effects.
In many animal studies changes in ventilatory patterns are assessed using whole
body plethysmography, for which measurements are reported as enhanced pause (Penh).
Some investigators report increased Penh as an indicator of AHR, but these are
inconsistently correlated and many investigators consider Penh solely an indicator of
altered ventilatory timing in the absence of other measurements to confirm AHR. Therefore
use of the terms AHR or airway responsiveness has been limited to instances in which the
terminology has been similarly applied by the study investigators.
Gottipolu et al. (2009, 190360) exposed WKY and SH rats to filtered air or DE
(particulate concentration 500 and 2000 |ug/m3) for 4 h/day and 5 days/week over a 4-week
period. Concentrations of gases were 1.3 and 4.8 ppm CO, NO <2.5 and 5.9 ppm NO, <0.25
and 1.2 ppm NO2, 0.2 and 0.3 ppm SO2 for low and high PM exposures, respectively. Particle
size, measured as geometric median number and volume diameters, was 85 and 220 nm,
respectively. No DE-related effects were found for breathing parameters measured by
whole-body plethysmography. Other pulmonary effects are described in Sections 7.3.3.2 and
7.3.5.1.
Woodsmoke
One study evaluated the effects of subchronic woodsmoke exposure on pulmonary
function in Brown Norway rats. Rats were exposed 3 h/day and 5 days/week for 4 and 12 wk
to air or to 1000-10,000 ug/ma concentrated wood smoke from the pinon pine which is native
to the U.S. Southwest (Tesfaigzi et al., 2002, 025575). PM concentrations in the woodsmoke
were 1,000 and 10,000 jug/m3 PM. The particles in this woodsmoke had a bimodal size
distribution with the smaller size fraction (74%) characterized by a MMAD of 0.405 um and
the larger size fraction (26%) characterized by a MMAD of 6.7-11.7 um. Many of these
larger particles would not be inhalable by the rat since 8 um MMAD particles are about
50% inhalable (Menache et al., 1995, 006533). Concentrations of gases were reported to be
15-106.4 ppm CO, 2.2-18.9 ppm NO, 2.4-19.7 ppm NOx and 3.5-13.8 ppm total hydrocarbon
in these exposures. Respiratory function measured by whole-body plethysmography
demonstrated a statistically significant increase in total pulmonary resistance in rats
exposed to 1000 |ug/m3 woodsmoke. Additional effects were found at 10,000 |u,g/m3.
Inflammatory and histopathological responses were also evaluated (see Sections 7.3.3.2 and
7.3.5.1).
July 2009
7-44
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
7.3.3. Pulmonary Inflammation
7.3.3.1. Epidemiologic Studies
One epidemiologic study examined the relationship of airway inflammation (eNO) and
PM measures, other pollutants, and indicators of motor vehicle emissions in Windsor,
Ontario (Dales et al., 2008, 156378). This cohort of 2,402 school children estimated PM2.5
and PM10-2.5 for each child's residence at the postal code level with an evaluated statistical
model (Wheeler et al., 2006, 103905). Each 10 pg/m3 increase in 1-yr PM2.5 was associated
with a 39% increase in eNO (p = 0.058). Associations between eNO and PM10-2.5 were
positive but not statistically significant.
7.3.3.2. Toxicological Studies
CAPs Studies
An important set of subchronic studies involved exposure of normal (C57BL1/6) mice,
ApoE"'" and the double-knockout ApoE'/LDLR"'" mice to Tuxedo, NY CAPs for 5-6 month
(March, April or May through September 2003 (Lippmann et al., 2005, 087452). The
average PM2.5 exposure concentration was 110 pg/m3. Animals were fed a normal chow diet
during the CAPs exposure period. No pulmonary inflammation was observed in response to
CAPs exposure as measured by BALF cell counts and histology. The lack of a persistent
pulmonary response may have been due to adaptation of the lung following repeated
exposures. In fact, a parallel study examined CAPs-related gene expression in the double-
knockout animals and found upregulation of numerous genes in lung tissue (Gunnison and
Chen, 2005, 087956). An in vitro study conducted simultaneously found daily variations in
CAPs-mediated NFkB activation in cultured human bronchial epithelial cells, suggesting
that transcription factor-mediated gene upregulation could occur in response to CAPs
(Maciejczyk and Chen, 2005, 087456). It should be noted that significant cardiovascular
effects were observed in these subchronic studies which are discussed in Section 7.2.1.2.
Araujo et al. (2008, 156222) compared the relative impact of ultrafine (0.01-0.18 pm)
versus fine (0.01-2.5 pm) PM inhalation in ApoE"'" mice following a 40 day exposure (5
hs/day x 3 days/week for 75 total hours). Animals were fed a normal chow diet and exposed
to PM from November 3-December 12, 2005 in a mobile inhalation laboratory that was
parked 300 m from the 110 Freeway in downtown Los Angeles. Particles were concentrated
to -440 pg/m3 for the fine exposures and -110 pg/m3 for the ultrafine exposures,
representing a roughly 15-fold increase in concentration from ambient levels! the number
concentration of PM in the fine and ultrafine chambers were roughly equivalent (4.56 x 105
and 5.59 x 10B particles/cm3, respectively). Over 50% of the ultrafine PM was comprised of
organic carbon compared to only 25% for PM2.5. No major increase in BALF inflammatory
July 2009
7-45
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
cells was found in response to PM. However ultrafine PM exposure resulted in significant
cardiovascular and systemic effects (see Section 7.3.5.2).
Diesel Exhaust
Gottipolu et al. (2009, 190360) exposed WKY and SH rats to filtered air or DE for
4 wk as described in Section 7.3.2.2. Previous studies from this laboratory have shown
enhanced effects of PM in SH compared with WKY rats. Although the main focus of this
recent study was on DE-induced mitochondrial oxidative stress and hypertensive gene
expression in the heart (see Section 7.2.7.1), some pulmonary effects were also found.
Subchronic exposure to DE resulted in a dose-dependent increase in BALF neutrophils in
both rat strains although levels of measured cytokines were not altered. Histopathological
analysis of lung tissue rats exposed to the higher concentration of DE demonstrated
accumulation of particle-laden macrophages as well as focal alveolar hyperplasia and
inflammation. Effect on indices of injury are discussed in Section 7.3.5.1.
Ishihara and Kagawa (2003, 096404) exposed Wistar rats to filtered air and DE
containing 200, 1,000 and 3,000 |ug/m3 PM for 16 h/day and 6 days/week for 6, 12, 18 or 24
months. The mass median particle diameter was reported to be between 0.3 and 0.5 |um.
Concentrations of gases ranged from 2.93-35.67 ppm NOx, 0.23-4.57 ppm SO2, 1.8-21.9 ppm
CO in the DE exposures. Statistically significant increases in total numbers of
inflammatory cells and neutrophils in BALF were observed beginning at 6-12 months of
exposure to DE containing 1,000 and 3,000 |u,g/m3 PM. When rats were exposed to DE
containing 1,000 ug/m3 PM, which was filtered to remove PM, the inflammatory cell
response was significantly diminished. These results implicate the PM fraction of DE as a
key determinant of the inflammation. The PM fraction was also found to mediate the
increase in protein levels, the decrease in PGE2 levels and alterations in mucus and
surfactant components observed in BALF (see Section 7.3.5.1).
Li et al. (2007, 155929) exposed BALB/c and C56BL/6 mice to low dose DE as
described in Section 7.3.2.2. for 1, 4 and 8 wk. Increases in numbers of BALF macrophages
and total inflammatory cells were observed in BALB/c mice at 8 wk but not 4 wk of DE
exposure. Persistent increases in numbers of BALF neutrophils and lymphocytes were
observed in both strains at 4 and 8 wk of DE exposure. Corresponding increases in BALF
cytokines differed between the two strains. These results should be interpreted with
caution since comparisons were made with Day 0 controls rather than age-matched
controls. No histopathological changes in the lungs were seen at any time point after DE
exposure. This study demonstrated differences in pulmonary responses to low dose DE
between 2 mouse strains. Altered AHR, pulmonary inflammation, markers of oxidative
stress and effects of antioxidant intervention were also evaluated (see Sections 7.3.2.2 and
7.3.4.1). Although no attempt was made in this study to determine the effects of gaseous
July 2009
7-46
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
components of DE on the measured responses, concentrations of gases were very low
suggesting that PM may have been responsible for the observed effects.
In a study by Hiramatsu et al. (2003, 155846), BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice were
exposed to DE (PM concentrations 100 and 3000 ug/m3) for 1 or 3 months. Concentrations of
gases were reported to be 3.5-9.5 ppm CO, 2.2-14.8 ppm NOx, and less than 0.01 ppm SO2.
Modest increases in BALF neutrophils and lymphocytes were observed in response to DE in
both mouse strains at 1 and 3 months. Histological analysis demonstrated DEP-laden
alveolar macrophages in alveoli and peribronchial tissues at both time points. Bronchus-
associated lymphoid tissue developed after 3 months exposure to the higher concentration
of DE in both mouse strains. Mac-1 positive cells (a marker of phagocytic activation of
alveolar macrophages) were also increased in BALF of BALB/c mice exposed to the higher
concentration of DE for 1 and 3 months. Increased expression of several cytokines and
decreased expression of iNOS mRNA was observed in DE-exposed mice at 1 and 3 months.
NFkB activation was also noted following 1 month exposure to the lower concentration of
DE. No attempt was made in this study to determine the responses to gaseous components
of the DE.
In a study by Reed et al. (2006, 156043), healthy Fisher 344 rats and A/J mice were
exposed to DE (PM concentration = 30, 100, 300 and 1000 |ug/m3) by whole body inhalation
for 6 h/day, 7 days/week for either 1 week or 6 months. Concentrations of gases were
reported to be 2.0-45.3 ppm NO, 0.2-4.0 ppm NO2, 1.5-29.8 ppm CO and 8-365 ppb SO2.
Short-term responses are discussed in Section 6.3.3.3 and 6.3.7.1, and sub-chronic systemic
effects are presented in Section 7.2.4.1. Six months of exposure resulted in no measurable
effects on pulmonary inflammation. However numerous black particles were observed
within alveolar macrophages after 6 months of exposure.
Seagrave et al. (2005, 088000) evaluated pulmonary responses in male and female
CDF (F-344)/CrlBR rats exposed 6 h/day for 6 months to filtered air or DE at concentrations
ranging from 30-1000 ug/m3 PM. Concentrations of gases were reported for the highest
exposure as 45.3 ppm NO, 4.0 ppm NO2, 29.8 ppm CO and 2.2 ppm total vapor
hydrocarbon. No changes in BALF cells were noted. A small decrease in TNFa was seen in
BALF of female rats exposed to the highest concentration of DE for 6 months. Pulmonary
injury also was evaluated (Section 7.3.5.1). Thus changes in BALF markers are modest and
gender specific.
Woodsmoke
Seagrave et al. (2005, 088000) also evaluated pulmonary responses in male and
female CDF (F344)/CrlBR rats exposed 6 h/day for 6 months to filtered air or HWS
concentrations ranging from 30-1000 ug/m3 PM. Concentrations of gases were reported for
the highest exposure as 3.0 ppm CO and 3.1 ppm total vapor hydrocarbon. A small increase
in BALF neutrophils was observed in male rats exposed to the lowest concentration of
July 2009
7-47
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
HWS. Female rats exhibited a decrease in BALF MIP-2 at the highest concentration of
HWS. Pulmonary injury also was evaluated (Section 7.3.5.1). In general, responses to HWS
were more remarkable than responses to DE seen in a parallel study. However these
gender-specific responses are modest and difficult to interpret.
In a study by Reed et al. (2006, 156043), Fisher 344 rats, SHR rats, A/J mice and
C57BL/6 mice were exposed to clean air or HWS (PM concentrations 30, 100, 300 and
1000 |ug/m3) by whole body inhalation for 6 h/day, 7 days/week for either 1 week or 6
months. Concentrations of gases ranged from 229.0-14887.6 mg/m3 for CO, 54.9-139.3 jug/m3
for ammonia, and 177.6- 3455.0 jug/m3 nonmethane VOC in these exposures. Short-term
responses are discussed in Section 6.3.7.2 and sub-chronic effects are presented in
Section 7.2.4.1. Histological analysis of lung tissue showed minimal increases in alveolar
macrophages. The effects of HWS on bacterial clearance are discussed below
(Section 7.3.7.2).
Another study evaluated the effects of subchronic woodsmoke exposure in Brown
Norway rats and is described in detail in Section 7.3.2.2 (Tesfaigzi et al., 2002, 025575).
Numbers of alveolar macrophages in BALF were significantly increased in rats exposed to
1000 jug/m3 woodsmoke for 12 wk, but no changes were seen in numbers of other
inflammatory cells. A large percent of BALF macrophages contained carbonaceous material.
Histological analysis of lung tissue showed minimal to mild inflammation in the epiglottis
of the larynx in rats exposed to both concentrations of woodsmoke.
Ramos et al. (2009, 190116) examined the effects of subchronic woodsmoke exposure
on the development of emphysema in guinea pigs. Inflammation is thought to be involved in
the pathogenesis of this form of COPD. Statistically significant increases in total numbers
of BALF cells were observed in guinea pigs exposed to smoke for 1-7 months, with numbers
of macrophages increased at 1-4 months and numbers of neutrophils increased at 4-7
months. At 4 months, alveolar mononuclear phagocytic and lymphocytic peribronchiolar
inflammation were observed by histopathological analysis of lung tissue. This study is
discussed in depth in Section 7.3.5.1.
Model Particles
Wallenborn et al. (2008, 191171) examined the pulmonary, cardiac and systemic
effects of subchronic exposure to particulate ZnSC>4. WKY rats were exposed nose-only to
10, 30, or 100 pg/m3 ultrafine particulate ZnSCk for 5 h/day and 3 day/wk over a 16-week
period. Particle size was reported to be 31-44 nm measured as number median diameter. No
changes in pulmonary inflammation or injury were observed although cardiac effects were
noted (see Section 7.2.7.1.). This study possibly demonstrates a direct effect of ZnSCk on
extrapulmonary systems, as suggested by the lack of pulmonary effects.
July 2009
7-48
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
7.3.4. Pulmonary Oxidative Response
7.3.4.1. Toxicological Studies
Urban Air
An interesting new study evaluated the effects of subchronic exposure to ambient
levels of urban particles on the development of emphysema in papain-treated mice (Lopes
et al., 2009, 190430). Since oxidative stress is thought to contribute to the development of
emphysema, 8-isoprostane levels were measured in lung tissue from the 4 groups of mice
used in this study A statistically significant increase in 8-isoprostane, a marker of oxidative
stress, was observed in lungs from mice treated with papain and exposed to ambient air
compared with the other groups of mice. This study is described in greater depth in
Section 7.3.5.1.
Diesel Exhaust
Li et al. (2007, 155929) exposed mice to low dose DE for 1, 4 and 8 wk as described in
Section 7.3.2.2. Markers of oxidative stress and effects of antioxidant intervention were
evaluated in this model. While HOI mRNA and protein were increased in lung tissues of
both mouse strains after 1 week of DE exposure (see Section 6.3.4.2), at 8 wk of DE
exposure, HOI protein levels remained high in C57BL/6 mice but returned to control
values in BALB/c mice. This study demonstrates differences in pulmonary responses to low
dose DE between two mouse strains. Furthermore, this study suggests that adaptation
occurs in BALB/c mice during prolonged DE exposure since the increase in HOI protein
seen in both strains at 1 week of exposure was only seen in C57BL/6 mice at 8 wk. Altered
AHR (Section 7.3.2.2) and pulmonary inflammation (Section 7.3.3.2) were also evaluated.
Although no attempt was made in this study to determine the effects of gaseous
components of DE on the measured responses, concentrations of gases were very low. This
suggests that PM may have been responsible for the observed effects.
7.3.5. Pulmonary Injury
7.3.5.1. Toxicological Studies
Urban Air
An important new study evaluated the effects of chronic exposure to ambient levels of
urban particles on lung development in the mouse (Mauad et al., 2008, 156743). Both
functional and anatomical indices of lung development were measured in mice exposed
July 2009
7-49
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
prenatally and/or postnatally as described in Section 7.3.2.2. Animals were sacrificed at 15
and 90 days of age for histological analysis of lungs. Histological analysis demonstrated the
presence of mild foci of macrophages containing black dots of carbon pigment in the
prenatal and postnatal exposure group at 90 days. In addition, the alveolar spaces of 15-day
old mice in the prenatal and postnatal exposure group were enlarged compared with
controls. Morphometric analysis demonstrated statistically significant decreases in surface
to volume ratio at 15 and 90 days in the pre and postnatal group compared with controls.
Since alveolarization is normally complete by 15 days of age, these results suggest
incomplete alveolarization in the 15-day old group and an enlargement of air spaces in the
90"day old group. These anatomical changes correlated with decrements in pulmonary
function which are discussed in Section 7.3.2.2.
Prolonged exposure to low levels of ambient air pollution beginning in early life has
been linked to secretory changes in the nasal cavity of mice, specifically increased
production of acidic mucosubstances (Pires-Neto et al., 2006, 096734). Six day-old Swiss
mice were continuously chamber exposed to ambient or filtered Sao Paulo air for 5 months.
Concentrations in the "polluted chamber" vs. "clean chamber" were (in ug/m3) 59.52 vs.
37.08 for NO2, 12.52 vs. 0 for BC, and 46.49 vs. 18.62 for PM2.5. Thus, pollutant levels were
reduced by filtration but not entirely eliminated. Compared to filtered air, exposure to
ambient air resulted in increased total mucus and acidic mucus in the epithelium lining the
nasal septum, but no statistically significant differences in other parameters (amount of
neutral mucus, volume proportions of neutral mucus, total mucus, or nonsecretory
epithelium, epithelial thickness, or ratio between neutral and acidic mucus). The
physicochemical properties of mucus glycoproteins are critical to the protective function of
the airway mucus layer. Acidified mucus is more viscous, and is associated with a decrease
in mucociliary transport. Thus acidic mucosubstances may represent impaired defense
mechanisms in the respiratory tract.
An interesting new study evaluated the effects of subchronic exposure to ambient
levels of urban particles on the development of emphysema in papain-treated mice (Lopes
et al., 2009, 190430). Emphysema is a form of COPD caused by the destruction of
extracellular matrix in the alveolar region of the lung which results in airspace
enlargement, airflow limitation and a reduction of the gas-exchange area of the lung.
Inflammation, oxidative stress, protease imbalance and apoptosis are thought to contribute
to the development of emphysema. In this study, male BALB/c mice were continuously
exposed to ambient or filtered Sao Paulo air for 2 months. Concentrations of PM2.5 in the
"polluted chamber" vs. "clean chamber" were 33.86 ± 2.09 vs. 2.68 ± 0.38 |u.g/m3. Thus
filtration reduced PM levels considerably. Ambient concentrations of CO and SO2 were 1.7
ppm and 16.2 ug/m3 respectively. No significant difference was observed in the
concentrations of NO2 in the "polluted chamber" vs "clean chamber" (60-80 ug/m3). Half of
the mice were pre-treated with papain by intranasal instillation in order to induce
July 2009
7-50
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
emphysema. Morphometric analysis of lung tissue demonstrated a statistically significant
increase in mean linear intercept, a measure of airspace enlargement, in papain-treated
mice compared with saline "treated controls exposed to filtered air. While exposure to
ambient air failed to increase mean linear intercept values in saline-treated mice, mean
linear intercept values were significantly increased in papain-treated mice exposed to
ambient air compaired with papain-treated mice exposed to filtered air. A similar pattern of
responses was observed for the volume proportion of collagen and elastin fibers in alveolar
tissue, which are markers of alveolar wall remodeling. Lung immunohistochemical analysis
demonstrated an effect of papain, but not ambient air, on macrophage cell density and
matrix metalloproteinase 12-positive cell density. No differences in caspase-3 positive cells,
a marker of apoptosis, were observed between the 4 groups of mice. Oxidative stress was
evaluated in this model as described in see Section 7.3.4.1. Taken together, results of this
study demonstrate that urban levels of PM, mainly from traffic sources, worsen protease-
induced emphysema in an animal model.
Pulmonary vascular remodeling, measured by a decrease in the lumen to wall ratio,
was observed in mice exposed to ambient Sao Paulo air for 4 months (Lemos et al., 2006,
088594). This study is described in greater detail in Section 7.2.1.2.
Kato and Kagawa (2003, 089563) exposed Wistar rats to roadside air contaminated
mainly with automobile emissions (55.7 to 65.2 ppb NO2 and 63 to 65 |ug/m3 suspended PM
[SPM]) and examined the effects on respiratory tissue after 24, 48, or 60 wk of exposure.
The surface of the lungs was light gray in color after all durations of exposure, and BC
particle deposits accumulated with prolonged exposure. These characteristics were not
evident in filtered air-exposed control animals, although filtered air contained low levels of
air pollutants (< 6.2 ppb NO2 and 15 jug/m3 SPM). The most common change observed using
transmission electron microscopy was the presence of particle laden (anthracotic) alveolar
macrophages, or anthracosis, in a wide range of pulmonary tissues, including the
submucosa, tracheal- and bronchiole-associated lymph nodes, alveolar wall and space,
pleura, and perivascular connective tissue. These changes were evident after 24 wk and
increased with duration of exposure. Other changes included increases in the number of
mucus granules in goblet cells, mast cell infiltration (but no degranulation) after 24 wk,
increased lysosomes in ciliated cells, some altered morphology of Clara cells, and
hypertrophy of the alveolar walls after 48 wk. No goblet cell proliferation was observed, but
slight, variable acidification of mucus granules appeared after 24 and 48 wk and
disappeared after 60 wk. Anthracotic macrophages were seen in contact with plasma cells
and lymphocytes in the lymphoid tissue, suggesting immune cell interaction in the
immediate vicinity of particles. Even after 60 wk, no lymph node anthracosis was observed
in the filtered air group.
In a post-mortem study of lung tissues from 20 female lifelong residents of Mexico
City, a high PM locale, histology demonstrated significantly greater amounts of fibrous
July 2009
7-51
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
tissue and muscle in the airway walls compared to subjects from Vancouver (Churg et al.,
2003, 087899), a city with relatively low PM levels. Electron microscopy showed
carbonaceous aggregates of ultrafine particles, which the authors conclude penetrate into
and are retained in the walls of small airways. The study shows an association between
retained particles and airway remodeling in the form of excess muscle and fibrotic walls.
The subjects were deemed suitable for examination based on never-smoker status, no use of
biomass fuels for cooking, no known occupational particle/dust exposure, death by cause
other than respiratory disease, and extended residence in each locale (lifelong for Mexico
City and >20 years for Vancouver). However, subjects from the two locales were not
matched with respect to ethnicity, sex (20 females from Mexico City vs. 13 females and 7
males from Vancouver), or mean age at death (66 ± 9 vs. 76 ± 11), and other possibly
influential factors such as exercise or diet were not considered.
Diesel Exhaust
Gottipolu et al. (2009, 190360) exposed WKY and SH rats to filtered air or DE as
described in Section 7.3.2.2. (Previous studies from this laboratory have shown enhanced
effects of PM in SH compared with WKY rats. Although the main focus of this recent study
was on DE-induced mitochondrial oxidative stress and hypertensive gene expression in the
heart (see Section 7.2.7.1), some pulmonary effects were found. Inflammatory effects are
described in Section 7.3.3.2. GGT activity in BALF was increased in both strains in
response to the higher concentration of DE. No DE-related changes were observed in BALF
protein or albumin. Histopathological analysis of lung tissue rats exposed to the higher
concentration of DE demonstrated accumulation of particle-laden macrophages as well as
focal alveolar hyperplasia and inflammation. No effects on indices of pulmonary function
were observed (see Section 7.3.2.2.)
Ishihara and Kagawa (2003, 096404) exposed rats to DE for up to 24 months as
described in Section 7.3.3.2. A statistically significant increase in BALF protein was
observed at 12 months of exposure to DE containing 1000 jug/m3 PM. This response was
attenuated when the DE was filtered to remove PM. Pulmonary inflammation was noted
and is described in Section 7.3.3.2.
Seagrave et al. (2005, 088000) evaluated pulmonary responses in rats exposed to DE
for up to 6 months as described in Section 7.3.3.2. A small increase in LDH was seen in
BALF of female rats exposed to the highest concentration of DE for 6 months. Pulmonary
inflammation was also evaluated (Section 7.3.3.2). The changes in BALF markers in this
study were modest and gender specific.
Gasoline Exhaust
Reed et al. (2008, 156903) examined a variety of health effects following subchronic
inhalation exposure to gasoline engine exhaust. Male and female CDF (F344)/CrlBR rats,
July 2009
7-52
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
SHR rats and male C57BL/6 mice were exposed for 6 h/day and 7 days/week for a period of
3 days to 6 months. The dilutions for the gasoline exhaust were L10, 1-15 and 1:90; filtered
PM was at the L10 dilution. PM mass ranged from 6.6 to 59.1 pg/m3, with the
corresponding number concentration between 2.6 x 104 and 5.0 x 105 particles/cm3.
Concentrations of gases ranged from 12.8-107.3 ppm CO, 2.0-17.9 ppm NO, 0.1-0.9 ppm
NO2, 0.09-0.62 ppm SO2 and 0.38-3.37 ppm NH3. Other effects for these studies are
presented in Sections 7.2.4.1.and 7.3.6.1. No pulmonary inflammation or histopathological
changes were noted in the F344 rats and A/J mice, except for a time-dependent increase in
the number of macrophages containing PM. However statistically significant increases of
47% and 29% in BALF LDH were observed in female and male F344 rats, respectively, after
6 months of exposure to the highest concentration of engine exhaust. This response was
absent when gasoline exhaust was filtered, implicating PM as a key determinant of this
response. In addition, exposure to the highest concentration of gasoline exhaust resulted in
statistically significant decreases in hydrogen peroxide and superoxide production in
unstimulated and stimulated BALF macrophages. Interestingly, hypermethylation of lung
DNA was observed in male F344 rats following 6 months of exposure to gasoline exhaust
containing 30 pg/m3 particulates. This response was PM-dependent since it was absent in
mice exposed to filtered gasoline exhaust. The significance of this epigenetic change in
terms of respiratory health effects is not known. However, alterered patterns of DNA
methylation can affect gene expression and are sometimes associated with altered immune
responses and/or the development of cancer.
Woodsmoke
Seagrave et al. (2005, 088000) also evaluated pulmonary responses in rats to HWS for
6 months as described in Section 7.3.3.2. Increases in BALF LDH and protein were seen in
male but not female rats Female rats exhibited a decrease in BALF glutathione at the
highest concentration of HWS. Decreases in BALF alkaline phosphatase were found in both
males and females exposed to 1000 |ug/m3 HWS. Male rats exposed to 100 and 300 |ug/m3
HWS exhibited a decrease in BALF 6-glucuronidase activity. Pulmonary inflammation was
also evaluated (Section 7.3.3.2). These changes in BALF markers in this study were modest
and gender specific.
Another study evaluated the effects of subchronic woodsmoke exposure in Brown
Norway rats as described in Section 7.3.2.2. (Tesfaigzi et al., 2002, 025575). Exposure to
1,000 ug/m3 woodsmoke for 12 wk resulted in a statistically significant increase in Alcian
Blue- (AB) and Periodic Acid Schiff- (PAS) positive airway epithelial cells compared to
controls, indicating an increase in mucous secretory cells containing neutral and acid
mucus, respectively. More significant histopathological responses were found following
exposure to 10,000 ug/m3 of DE. Pulmonary function and inflammation were evaluated also
July 2009
7-53
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
but are not discussed here due to the extremely high exposure level (Sections 7.3.2.2 and
7.3.3.2).
Ramos et al. (2009, 190116) examined the effects of subchronic woodsmoke exposure
on the development of emphysema in guinea pigs. In particular, the involvement of
macrophages and macrophage-derived matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) in woodsmoke-
related responses was investigated. Guinea pigs were exposed to ambient air or to whole
smoke from pine wood for 3 h/day and 5 days/week over a 7-month period. PMio and PM2.5
concentrations in the exposure chambers were reported to be 502 ± 34 and 363 ± 23 |u,g/m3,
respectively, while the concentration of CO was less than 80 ppm. COHb levels were
reported to be 6% in controls and 15-20% in smoke-exposed guinea pigs. Statistically
significant decreases in body weight were observed in guinea pigs exposed to smoke for 4 or
more months compared with controls. Statistically significant increases in total numbers of
BALF cells were observed in guinea pigs exposed to smoke for 1-7 months, with numbers of
macrophages increased at 1-4 months and numbers of neutrophils increased at 4-7 months.
At 4 months, alveolar mononuclear phagocytic and lymphocytic peribronchiolar
inflammation, as well as bronchiolar epithelial and smooth muscle hyperplasia, were
observed by histopathological analysis of lung tissue. Emphysematous lesions, smooth
muscle hyperplasia and pulmonary arterial hypertension were noted at 7 months.
Morphometric analysis of lung tissue demonstrated statistically significant increases in
mean linear intercept values, a measure of airspace enlargement, in guinea pigs at 6 and 7
months of exposure. Statistically significant increases in elastolytic activity was observed in
BAL macrophages and lung tissue homogenates at 1-7 months of exposure. Lung
collagenolytic activity was also increased at 4-7 months of exposure and corresponded in
time with the presence of active forms of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in lung tissue homogenates
and BALF. Furthermore, MMP-1 and MMP-9 immunoreactivity was detected in
macrophages, epithelial and interstitial cells in smoke-exposed animals at 7 months.
Increased levels of MMP-2 and MMP-9 mRNA were also found in smoke-exposed guinea
pigs after 3-7 months. Apoptosis was found in BAL macrophages (TUNEL assay) from
guinea pigs exposed to smoke for 3-7 months and in alveolar epithelial cells (caspase-3
immunore activity) after 7 months. Taken together, these results provide evidence that
subchronic exposure to woodsmoke leads to the development of emphysematous lesions
accompanied by the accumulation of alveolar macrophages, increased levels and activation
of MMP's, connective tissue remodeling and apoptosis. Unfortunately, the high levels of CO
and COHb reported in this study make it difficult to conclude that woodsmoke PM alone is
responsible for these dramatic effects.
July 2009
7-54
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
7.3.6. Allergic Responses
7.3.6.1. Epidemiologic Studies
A number of epidemiologic studies have found associations between PM and allergic
(or atopic) indicators. Allergy is a major driver of asthma, which has been associated with
PM in studies discussed in previous sections. In a study by Annesi-Maesano (2007, 093180)
(described in Section 7.3.1.1) atopic asthma was related to PM2.5 (OR 1.43 [95% CP
1.07-1.91]) and positive skin prick test to common allergens was also increased with higher
PM levels. This report is consistent with the results from an earlier study (Penard'Morand
et al., 2005, 087951) in the same sample of children that associated allergic rhinitis and
atopic dermatitis with PM10. Also, Morgenstern et al. (2008, 156782) found statistically
significant effects for asthmatic bronchitis, hay fever, and allergic sensitization to pollen in
a cohort of children in Germany examining modeled PM2.5 data at birth addresses. Distance
to a main road had a dose-response relationship with sensitization to outdoor allergens.
Nordling et al. (2008, 097998) (discussed above in Section 7.3.2.1) reported a positive
association of PM10 exposure during the first year of life with allergenic sensitization (igE
antibodies) to inhaled allergens, especially pollen. In a study by Brauer et al. (2007,
090691) (discussed above in Section 7.3.1.1) an interquartile range increase in PM2.5was
associated with an increased risk of sensitization to food allergens (OR 1.75 [95% CI
1.23-2.47]). A significant association was found for sensitization to any allergen, but none
was found for sensitization to specific indoor or outdoor aeroallergens or atopic dermatitis
(eczema). In a study by Janssen et al. (2003, 133555), PM2.5 was associated with allergic
indicators such as hay fever (ever), skin prick test reactivity to outdoor allergens, current
itchy rash, and conjunctivitis in Dutch children. These same outcomes were also associated
with proximity of the school to truck traffic but not car traffic, suggesting a role for diesel-
related pollution. Consistent with the aforementioned Dutch study by Brauer et al. (2007,
090691). PM2.5 was not associated with eczema.
Mortimer et al. (2008, 187280) examined the association between prenatal and early-
life exposures to air pollutants with allergic sensitization in a cohort of 170 children with
asthma, age 6-11, living in central California. Sensitization to at least one allergen was
associated with higher levels of PM10 and CO during the entire pregnancy and 2nd
trimester and higher PM10 during the first two years of life. Sensitization to at least one
indoor allergen was associated with higher exposures to PM10 and CO in during the entire
pregnancy and during the 2nd trimester. However, no significant associations remained for
PM10 after adjustment for co-pollutants, effect modifiers, or potential cofounders in addition
to year of birth. The authors advise that the large number of comparisons may be of concern
and this study should be viewed as an exploratory, hypothesis-generating undertaking. In
examining the National Health Interview Survey for the years 1997-2006, Bhattacharyya
July 2009
7-55
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
et al. (2009, 180154) found relationships between air quality and the prevalence of hay
fever and sinusitis. However, the air quality data were not clearly defined and as such
caution is required in interpretation of these results. In contrast, Bayer-Oglesby et al.
(2005, 086245) found no significant association between declining levels of PMio and hay
fever in Switzerland. In a study by Oftedal et al. conducted in Oslo, Norway (2007, 191948),
earlylife exposure to PMio or PM2.5 was generally not associated with sensitization to
allergens in 9-10-year-old children! lifetime exposures to PMio and PM2.5 were associated
with dust mite allergy, but the association was diminished by adjustment for socioeconomic
factors . In Norway, wood burning in the wintertime is thought to account for about half of
the PM2.5 levels. Although associations between PM and reactivity to specific allergens have
been reported in long-term studies, there is a consistent lack of correlation between PM and
total IgE levels, indicating a selective enhancement of allergic responses.
7.3.6.2. Toxicological Studies
Diesel Exhaust
Exposure to relatively low doses of DE has been shown to exacerbate asthmatic
responses in OVA sensitized and challenged BALB/c mice (Matsumoto et al., 2006, 098017).
Mice were intraperitoneally sensitized and intranasally challenged lday prior to inhalation
exposure to DE (PM concentration 100 jug/m3! CO, 3.5 ppm! NO2, 2.2 ppm! SO2 <0.01 ppm)
for 1 day or 1, 4, or 8 wk (7/h/day, 5 days/week, endpoints 12-h post DE exposure). Results
from the 1- and 4-week exposures are described in Section 6.3.6.3. It should be noted that
control mice were left in a clean room as opposed to undergoing chamber exposure to
filtered air. The significant increases in AHR and airway sensitivity observed following
shorter exposure periods did not persist at 8 wk. BALF cytokines were altered by DE
exposure with only RANTES significantly elevated after 8 wk. DE had no effect on OVA
challenge-induced peribronchial inflammatory or mucin positive cells. These results suggest
that adaptive processes may have occurred during prolonged exposure to DE.
Gasoline Exhaust
In a study by Reed et al. (2008, 156903), BALB/c mice were exposed to whole gasoline
exhaust diluted 1^10 (H), l: 15 (M), or 1:90 (L), filtered exhaust at the 1^10 (HF), or clean air
for 6 h/day (atmospheric characterization described in Section 6.3.6.3). GEE exposure from
conception through four weeks of age induced slight but non-significant increases in ova-
specific IgGl in offspring but had no significant effect on airway reactivity, BAL cytokine or
cell concentrations, although there were non-significant increases in lung neutrophils and
eosinophils. Significant increases in total serum IgE were observed, but this effect persisted
after filtration of particles and was thus attributed to gas phase components.
July 2009
7-56
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Woodsmoke
In a study by Tesfaigzi et al. (2005, 156116), Brown Norway rats were sensitized and
challenged with ovalbumin. Rats were exposed for 70 days to filtered air or to 1000 ug/m';
HWS. Particles were characterized by a MMAD of 0.36 |um. Concentrations of gases were
reported to be 13.0 ppm CO and 3.1 ppm total vapor hydrocarbon with negligible NOx.
Respiratory function was measured in anesthetized animals by whole-body
plethysmography and demonstrated a significant increase in functional residual capacity as
well as a significant increase in dynamic lung compliance in HWS-exposed animals
compared to controls. No change in total pulmonary resistance or airway responsiveness to
methacholine was observed. BALF inflammatory cells were not increased, although
histological analysis demonstrated focal inflammation including granulomatous lesion and
eosinophilic infiltrations in HWS-exposed rats. Alterations of several cytokines in BALF
and plasma were noted. Changes in airway epithelial mucus cells and intraepithelial stored
mucosubstances were modest and did not achieve statistical significance. Results of this
study demonstrate that subchronic exposure to HWS had minimal effects on pulmonary
responses in a rat model of allergen sensitization and challenge.
7.3.7. Host Defense
7.3.7.1. Epidemiologic Studies
Epidemiologic studies of respiratory infections indicate an association with PM. This
is more evident when considering short-term exposures (Chapter 6), but studies of long-
term exposures have observed associations with general respiratory symptoms often caused
by infection, such as bronchitis. In a birth cohort study of approximately 4,000 Dutch
children, Brauer et al. (2007, 09069lXdescribed in Section 7.3.1.1) found significant positive
associations for PM2.5 with ear/nose/throat infections and doctor-diagnosed flu/serious cold
in the first four years of life. These results are consistent with an earlier study by Brauer et
al. (2006, 090757), which found that an increase of 3 |ug/m3 PM2.5 was associated with
modestly increased risk for ear infections in the Netherlands [OR 1.13 (95% CI, 1.00-1.27)].
ASwiss study by Bayer-Oglesby et al. (2005, 086245), discussed in Section 7.3.1.1 above,
demonstrated that declining levels of PM10 were associated with declining prevalence of
common cold and conjunctivitis. Because traffic-related pollutants such as ultrafine
particles are high near major roadways and then decay exponentially over a short distance,
Williams, et al. (2009, 191945) assessed exposure according to residential proximity to
major roads in a Seattle area study of postmenopausal women. Proximity to major roads
was associated with a 21% decrease in natural killer cell function, which is an important
defense against viral infection and tumors. This finding was limited to women who reported
exercising near traffic! other markers of inflammation and lymphocyte proliferation did not
July 2009
7-57
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
consistently differ according to proximity to major roads. In the Puget Sound region of
Washington, Karr et al. (2009, 191946) reported that there may be a modest increased risk
of bronchiolitis related to PM2.5 exposure for infants born just before the peak respiratory
syncytial virus (RSV) season. Risk estimates were stronger when restricted to cases
specifically attributed to RSV and for infants residing closer to highways. Emerging
evidence suggests that respiratory infections, particularly infection by viruses such as RSV,
can cause asthma or trigger asthma attacks.
7.3.7.2. Toxicological Studies
Diesel Exhaust
DE may affect systemic immunity. The proliferative response of A/J mouse spleen
cells following stimulation with T cell mitogens was suppressed by 6 months of daily
exposure to DE at concentrations at or above 300 |u,g/m3 PM (Burchiel et al., 2004, 055557).
B cell proliferation was increased at 300 |ug/m3 but unaffected at higher concentrations (up
to 1000 |ug/m3). Concentrations of gases and were reported in the parallel study by Reed et
al. (2004, 055625), described in Section 7.3.3.2 Pulmonary Inflammation/Diesel exhaust.
The Reed study reported a decrease in spleen weight in male mice (27% reduction in the
300 jug/m3 exposure group). The immunosuppressive effects of DE were not due to PAHs or
benzo(ayrene (BaP)-quinones (BPQs) since there were little, if any, of these compounds
present in the chamber atmosphere. It should be noted that sentinel animals were negative
for mouse parvovirus at the start of the study, but seroconverted by the end of the study,
indicating possible infection. Parvovirus can interfere with the modulation of lymphocyte
mitogenic responses (Baker, 1998, 156245). A six month exposure (6h/day, 7d/week) to 30,
100, 300 or 1000 ug/m3 of PM in DE did not significantly affect bacterial clearance in
C57BL/6 mice infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, although all levels reduced bacterial
clearance when the exposure only lasted a week (Harrod et al., 2005, 088144).
Characterization of the exposure atmosphere was given by Reed et al. (2004, 055625)
(Section 7.3.3.2 Pulmonary Inflammation/Diesel exhaust).
Gasoline Exhaust
In a study by Reed et al. (2008, 156903) (described in Section 6.3.6.3) long-term
exposure to fresh gasoline exhaust (6h/day, 7d/week for 6 months) did not affect clearance of
P. aeruginosa from the lungs of C57BL/6 mice.
Hardwood Smoke
One study demonstrated immunosuppressive effects of HWS (Burchiel et al., 2005,
088090}. Exposure to HWS increased proliferation of T cells from A/J mice exposed daily to
100 jug/m3 PM for 6 months, but produced a concentration-dependent suppression of
July 2009
7-58
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
proliferation at PM concentrations >300 Lig/m:;. No effects on B cell proliferation were
observed. Concentrations of NO and NO2 were not detectable or <40 ppb for all exposure
levels. CO was reported to be 2, 4, and 13 ppm for the 100, 300 and 1000 |ug/m3 PM
concentrations, respectively. Exposure atmospheres contained significant levels of
naphthalene and methylated napthalenes, fluorene, phenanthrene, and anthracene, as well
as low concentrations of several metals (K, Ca, and Fe) (Burchiel et al., 2005, 088090). It
should be noted that serologic analysis of study sentinel animals indicated infection with
parvovirus , which can interfere with the modulation of lymphocyte mitogenic responses
(Baker, 1998, 156245). In another study by Reed et al. (2006, 156043) C57BL/6 mice were
exposed to 30-1000 |u.g/m3 HWS by whole body inhalation for 6 months prior to instillation
of P. aeruginosa. Exposure characterizations are described in Section 7.3.3.2. Although
there was a trend toward increased clearance with increasing exposure concentrations,
there was no statistically significant effect of HWS exposure on bacterial clearance.
7.3.8. Respiratory Mortality
Two large U.S. cohort studies examined the effect of long-term exposure to PM2.5 on
respiratory mortality with mixed results. In the ACS, Pope et al. (2004, 055880) reported
positive associations with deaths from specific cardiovascular diseases, but no PM2.5
associations were found with respiratory mortality. A followup to the Harvard Six Cities
study (Laden et al., 2006, 087605) used updated air pollution and mortality data and found
positive associations between long-term exposure to PM2.5 and mortality. Of special note is a
statistically significant reduction in mortality risk reported with reduced long-term fine
particle concentrations observed for deaths due to cardiovascular and respiratory causes,
but not for lung cancer deaths. There is some evidence for an association between PM2.5 and
respiratory mortality among post-neonatal infants (ages 1 mo to 1 yr) (see Section 7.4.1). In
summary, when deaths due to respiratory causes are separated from all-cause (non-
accidental) and cardiopulmonary deaths, there is limited and inconsistent evidence for an
effect of PM2.5 on respiratory mortality, with one large cohort study finding a reduction in
deaths due to respiratory causes associated with reduced PM2.5 concentrations, and another
large cohort study finding no PM2.5 associations with respiratory mortality.
7.3.9. Summary and Causal Determinations
7.3.9.1. PM2.5
The epidemiologic studies reviewed in the 2004 PM AQCD suggested relationships
between long-term PM10 and PM2.5 (or PM2.1) exposures and increased incidence of
respiratory symptoms and disease. One of these studies indicated associations with
July 2009
7-59
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
bronchitis in the 24-city cohort (Dockery et al., 1996, 077269). They also suggested
relationships between long-term exposure to PM2.5 and pulmonary function decrements in
the CHS (Gauderman et al., 2000, 012531; Gauderman et al., 2002, 026013). These findings
added to the database of the earlier 22-city study of PM2.1 (Raizenne et al., 1996, 077268)
that found an association between exposure to ambient particle strong acidity and
impairment of lung function in children. No long-term exposure toxicological studies were
reported in the 2004 PM AQCD.
Recent studies have greatly expanded the evidence available since the 2004 PM
AQCD. New analyses have been conducted that include longer follow-up periods of the CHS
cohort through 18 years of age and provide evidence that effects from exposure to PM2.5
persist into early adulthood. Gauderman et al. (2004, 056569) reported that PM2.5 exposure
was associated with clinically and statistically significant deficits in FEVi attained at the
age of 18 years. In addition the strength and robustness of the outcomes were larger in
magnitude, and more precise than previous CHS studies with shorter followup periods.
Supporting this result are new longitudinal cohort studies conducted by other researchers
in other locations with different methods. These studies report results for PM10 that is
dominated by PM2.5. New studies provide positive associations from Mexico City, Sweden,
and a national cystic fibrosis cohort in the U.S. A natural experiment in Switzerland, where
PM levels had decreased, reported that improvement in air quality may slow the annual
rate of decline in lung function in adulthood, indicating positive consequences for public
health. Thus, the data are consistent and coherent across several study designs, locations
and researchers. As was found in the 2004 PM AQCD, the studies report associations with
PM2.5 and PM10, while most did not evaluate PM10-2.5. Associations have been reported with
fine particle components, particularly EC and OC. Source apportionment methods generally
have not been used in these long-term exposure studies.
Coherence and biological plausibility for the observed associations with lung function
decrements is provided by recent toxicological studies (Section 7.3.2.2). A recent study
demonstrated that pre- and postnatal exposure to ambient levels of urban particles affected
mouse lung development, as measured by anatomical and functional indices (Mauad et al.,
2008, 156743). Another study suggested that the developing lung may be susceptible to PM
since acute exposure to ultrafine iron-soot decreased cell proliferation in the proximal
alveolar region of neonatal rats (Pinkerton et al., 2004, 087465) (Section 6.3.5.3). Impaired
lung development is a viable mechanism by which PM may reduce lung function growth in
children. Other animal toxicological studies have demonstrated alterations in pulmonary
function following exposure to DE and WS (Section 7.3.2.2).
An expanded body of epidemiologic evidence for the effect of PM2.5 on respiratory
symptoms and asthma incidence now includes prospective cohort studies conducted by
different researchers in different locations, both within and outside the U.S. with different
methods. The CHS provides evidence in a prospective longitudinal cohort study that relates
July 2009
7-60
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
PM2.5 and bronchitic symptoms and reports larger associations for within-community
effects that are less subject to confounding than between-community effects (McConnell et
al., 2003, 049490). Several new studies report similar findings with long-term exposure to
PMio in areas where fine particles predominate. In England, an association was seen with
an increased prevalence of cough without a cold. Further evidence includes a reduction of
respiratory symptoms corresponding to decreasing PM levels in natural experiments in
cohorts of Swiss school children (Bayer-Oglesby et al., 2005, 086245) and adults (Schindler
et al., 2009, 191950).
New studies examine the relationship between long-term PM2.5 exposure and asthma
incidence. PM2.5 had the strongest modifying effect on the association between lung function
with asthma in an analysis of the CHS (Islam et al., 2007, 090697). The loss of protection
by high lung function against new onset asthma in high PM2.5 communities was observed
for all the lung function measures. In the Netherlands, an association with doctor-
diagnosed asthma was found in a birth cohort examining the first 4 years of life (Brauer et
al., 2007, 090691) Further, findings from an adult cohort suggest that traffic-related PM10
contributes to asthma development and that reductions in PM decrease asthma risk
(Kunzli et al., 2009, 191949).
A large proportion of asthma is driven by allergy, and the majority of recent
epidemiologic studies examining allergic (or atopic) indicators found positive associations
with PM2.5 or PM10 (Section 7.3.6.1). Limited evidence for PM-mediated allergic responses is
provided by toxicological studies of DE and woodsmoke, while effects of gasoline exhaust
were attributed to gaseous components (Section 7.3.6.2).
Long-term PM2.5 exposure is associated with pulmonary inflammation and oxidative
responses. An epidemiologic study found a relationship between PM2.5 and increased
inflammatory marker eNO among school children (Dales et al., 2008, 156378). Toxicological
studies of pulmonary inflammation have demonstrated mixed results, with subchronic DE
exposures generating increases and CAPs and WS inducing little or no response (Section
7.3.3.2). The pulmonary inflammation observed with DE was attributable to the particle
fraction. Toxicological studies also reported evidence of oxidative responses (Section 7.3.4.1).
Adaptation to prolonged DE was observed for some oxidative responses in addition to some
allergic and pulmonary function responses (Section 7.3.2.2 and 7.3.6.2).
Additional support for the relationship between long-term PM2.5 exposures and
respiratory outcomes is provided by pulmonary injury responses observed in toxicological
studies (Section 7.3.5.1). Markers of pulmonary injury were increased in rats exposed to DE
and gasoline exhaust! and these changes were attributable to PM. Further, lung DNA
methylation was observed in the gasoline exhaust study. Histopathological changes have
also been reported following exposure to heavily-trafficked urban air and to woodsmoke.
Findings include nasal and airway mucous cell hyperplasia accompanied by alterations in
mucus production which can lead to a loss of mucus-mediated protective functions!
July 2009
7-61
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
exacerbation of protease-induced emphysema! and mast cell infiltration and hypertrophy of
alveolar walls. These results provide biological plausibility for adverse respiratory outcomes
following long-term PM exposure.
Limited information is available on host defense responses (Section 7.3.7) and
respiratory mortality (Section 7.3.8) resulting from PM2.5 exposure. Several recent
epidemiologic studies suggest a relationship between long-term exposure to PM2.5or PM10
and infection in children and infants (Section 7.3.7.1). A few toxicological studies suggest
that DE exposure affects systemic immunity and although impaired bacterial clearance is
associated with short-term exposures to DE, neither DE or gasoline exhaust seems to have
this effect after longer exposures (Section 7.3.7.2).
In summary the strongest evidence for a relationship between long-term exposure to
PM2.5 and respiratory morbidity is provided by epidemiologic studies demonstrating
associations with decrements in lung function growth in children and with respiratory
symptoms and disease incidence in adults. Mean PM2.5 concentrations in these study
locations ranged from 13.8 to 30 pg/m3 during the study periods. These studies provide
evidence for associations in areas where PM is predominantly fine particles. A major
challenge to interpreting the results of these studies is that the PM size fractions and
concentrations of other air pollutants are often correlated! however, the consistency of
findings across different locations supports an independent effect of PM2.5. Recent
toxicological studies provide support for the associations with PM2.5 and decreases in lung
function growth in children. Pre- and postnatal exposure to ambient levels of urban
particles was found to affect mouse lung development, which provides biological plausibility
for the epidemiologic findings. Recent subchronic and chronic toxicological studies also
demonstrate altered pulmonary function, mild inflammation, oxidative responses,
histopathological changes including mucus cell hyperplasia and enhanced allergic
responses in response to CAPs, DE, urban air and woodsmoke and provide further
coherence and biological plausibility. Exacerbation of emphysematous lesions was noted in
one study involving exposure to urban air in a heavily-trafficked area. Collectively, the
evidence is sufficient to conclude that the relationship between long-term PM2.5 exposure and
respiratory effects is likely to be causal.
7.3.9.2. PM10-2.5
The 2004 PM AQCD did not report long-term exposure studies for PM10-2.5. The only
recent study to evaluate long-term exposure to PM10-2.5 found positive, but not statistically
significant associations with eNO (Dales et al., 2008, 156378). The evidence is inadequate to
determine if a causal relationship exists between long-term PM10 2.5 exposures and respiratory
effects.
July 2009
7-62
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
7.3.9.3. Ultrafine PM
The 2004 PM AQCD did not report long-term exposure studies for ultrafine PM. The
current evidence for long-term ultrafine PM effects is limited to toxicological studies.
Generally, subchronic exposure to DE induced pulmonary inflammation, which was in
contrast to ultrafine CAPs exposure (Section 7.3.3.2) It appeared that the PM fraction was
responsible for the inflammatory response with DE exposure. Long-term exposure to DE
also resulted in oxidative and allergic responses, although lung injury was not remarkable
(Sections 7.3.4.1 and 7.3.6.2). The evidence is inadequate to determine if a causal relationship
exists between long-term UFP exposures and respiratory effects.
7.4. Reproductive, Developmental, Prenatal and Neonatal
Outcomes
7.4.1. Epidemiologic Studies
This section evaluates and summarizes the scientific evidence on PM and
developmental and pregnancy outcomes and infant mortality. Infants and fetal development
processes may be particularly vulnerable to PM exposure, and although the physical
mechanisms are not fully understood, several hypotheses have been proposed involving
direct effects on fetal health, altered placenta function, or indirect effects on the mother's
health (Bracken et al., 2003, 156288; Clifton et al., 2001, 156360; Maisonet et al., 2004,
156725; Schatz et al., 1990, 156073; Sram et al., 2005, 087442). Study of these outcomes
can be difficult given the need for detailed data and potential residential movement of
mothers during pregnancy. Two recent articles have reviewed methodological issues
relating to the study of outdoor air pollution and adverse birth outcomes (Ritz and Wilhelm,
2008, 156914; Slama et al., 2008, 156985). Some of the key challenges to interpretation of
these study results include the difficulty in assessing exposure as most studies use existing
monitoring networks to estimate individual exposure to ambient PM; the inability to
control for potential confounders such as other risk factors that affect birth outcomes (e.g.,
smoking); evaluating the exposure window (e.g., trimester) of importance! and limited
evidence on the physiological mechanism of these effects (Ritz and Wilhelm, 2008, 156914;
Slama et al., 2008, 156985). Another uncertainty is whether PM effects differ by the child's
sex. A review of pre-term birth and low birth weight studies found limited indication that
effects may differ by gender, however sample size was limited (Ghosh et al., 2007, 091233).
Previous summaries of the association between PM concentrations and pregnancy
outcomes and infant mortality were presented in previous PM AQCDs. The 1996 PM AQCD
concluded that although few studies had been conducted on the link between PM and infant
mortality, the research "suggested an association," particularly for post-neonates (U.S. EPA,
July 2009
7-63
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
1996, 079380). In the 2004 PM AQCD, additional evidence was available on PM's effect on
fetal and early postnatal development and mortality (U.S. EPA, 2004, 056905) and although
some studies indicated a relationship between PM and pregnancy outcomes, others did not.
Studies identifying associations found that exposure to PMio early during pregnancy (first
month of pregnancy) or late in the pregnancy (six weeks prior to birth) were linked with
higher risk of preterm birth, including models adjusted for other pollutants, and that PM2.5
during the first month of pregnancy was associated with interuterine growth restriction.
However, other work did not identify relationships between PM10 exposure and low birth
weight. The state of the science at that time, as indicated in the 2004 PM AQCD, was that
the research provided mixed results based on studies from multiple countries, and that
additional research was required to better understand the impact of PM on pregnancy
outcomes and infant mortality. Considering evidence from recent studies discussed below,
along with previous AQCD conclusions, epidemiologic studies consistently report
associations between PM10 and PM2.5 exposure and low birth weight and infant mortality,
especially during the post-neonatal period. Animal toxicological evidence supports these
associations with PM2.5, but provides little mechanistic information or biological
plausibility. Information on the ambient concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 in these study
sites can be found in Table 7-5.
Low Birth Weight
A large number of studies have investigated exposure to ambient PM and low birth
weight at term, including a U.S. national study, as well as two studies in the northeast
U.S., and four in California have been conducted. Parker and Woodruff (2008, 156846)
linked U.S. birth records for singletons delivered at 40 wk gestation in 2001-2003 during
the months of March, June, September and December to quarterly estimates of PM
exposure by county of residence and month of birth. They found an association between
PM10-2.5 and birthweight (-13 g [95% CP -18.3 to -7.6]) per 10 pg/m3 increase), but no such
association for PM2.5.
Maisonet et al. (2001, 016624) analyzed 89,557 births (1994-96) in six northeastern
cities (Boston and Springfield MA, Hartford CT, Philadelphia and Pittsburgh PA,
Washington DC). Each city had three PM10 monitors measuring every sixth day. Results
from multiple monitors were averaged in each city. Exposure was determined for each
trimester of pregnancy and categorized by quartiles (<25, 25-30, 31-35, 36-43 pg/m3) and
95th percentile (>43pg/m3). There was no increased risk for low birth weight at term
associated with PM10 exposure during any trimester of pregnancy. When birth weight was
considered as a continuous outcome, exposure to PM10 was not associated with a reduction
in mean birth weight.
July 2009
7-64
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table 7-5. Characterization of ambient PM concentrations from studies of reproductive,
developmental, prenatal and neonatal outcomes and long-term exposure.
Reference
Location
Mean Annual
Concentration (jjg/m3)
Upper Percentile
Concentrations (jjg/m3)
PM2.5
Basu et al. (2004, 087896)
CA
Range of means across sites: 14.5-18.2
Avg of means across sites: 16.2
Max: 26.3-34.1
Bell et al. (2007,091059)
CT&MA
22.3
Braueret al. (2008,156292)
Vancouver, Canada
5.3
Max: 37.0
Huvnhet al. (2006, 091240)
CA
Range of means across trimesters: 17.5-18.8
Avg of means across trimesters: 18.2
Jalaludin et al. (2007,156601)
Sydney, Australia
9.0
Liu (2007, 090429)
Multicity, Canada
12.2
75th: 15
Loomis et al. (1999, 087288)
Mexico City
27.4
Max: 85
Mannes et al. (2005, 087895)
Sydney, Australia
9.4
75th: 11.2; Max: 82.1
Parker et al. (2005, 087462)
CA
15.4
Ritz et al. (2007, 096146)
Los Angeles, CA
20.0
Wilhelm and Ritz (2005, 088668)
Los Angeles, CA
21.0
Max: 38.9-48.5
Woodruff et al. (2006, 088758)
CA
19.2"
75th: 22.7
Woodruff et al. (2008, 098386)
U.S.
Range of means across effects: 14.5-14.9°
Avg of means across effects: 14.8°
75th: 18.5-18.7
PM10-2.5
Parker etal. (2008.156013)
U.S.
13.2
75th: 17.5
PMm
Bell et al. (2007, 093256)
CT&MA
22.3
Braueret al. (2008,156292)
Vancouver, Canada
12.7
Max: 35.4
Chenet al. (2002, 024945)'
Washoe County, NV
31.53
75th: 39.35; Max: 157.32
Gilboaetal. (2005,087892)
TX
23.8"
75th: 29
Ha et al. (2003, 042552)
Seoul, South Korea
69.2
75th: 87.7; Max: 245.4
Hansen et al. (2006, 089818)
Brisbane, Australia
19.6
Max: 171.7
Hansen et al. (2007, 090703)
Brisbane, Australia
19.6
75th: 22.7; Max: 171.7
Jalaludin et al. (2007,156601)
Sydney, Australia
16.3
Kim etal. (2007,156642)
Seoul, Korea
Range of means across time: 88.7-89.7
Avg of means across time: 89.2
Lee et al. (2003, 043202)
Seoul, Korea
71.1
75th: 89.3; Max: 236.9
Leem et al. (2006, 089828)
Incheon, Korea
53.8"
75th: 64.6; Max: 106.39
Lipfert et al. (2000, 004103)
U.S.
33.1
Max: 59
Maisonet et al. (2001, 016624)
NE U.S.
31.0"
75th: 36.1; Max: 46.5
Mannes et al. (2005, 087895)
Sydney, Australia
16.8
75th: 19.9; Max: 104.0
Pereira et al. (1998, 007264)
Sao Paulo, Brazil
65.04
Max: 192.8
Ritz et al. (2000, 012068)
CA
49.3
Max: 178.8
Ritz et al. (2006, 089819)
CA
46.3
Max: 83.5
Rogers and Dunlop (2006, 091232)
GA
3.75
75th: 15.07
Romieu et al. (2004, 093074)
Ciudad Juarez, Mexico
33.0-45.9
July 2009
7-65
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Reference
Location
Mean Annual
Concentration (ng/m3)
Upper Percentile
Concentrations (ng/m3)
Sagivet al. (2005, 087468)
PA
Range of means across time: 25.3-27.1
Avg of means across time: 26.2
Max: 68.9-156.3
Salam et al. (2005, 087885)
CA
Range of means across trimesters: 45.4-46.6
Avg of means across trimesters: 45.8
Suh et al. (2008,192077)
Seoul, Korea
Range of means across trimesters: 54.6-61.1
Avg of means across trimesters: 58.27
75th: 62.8-67.8
Max: 85.1-107.36
Tsai et al. (2006, 090709)
Kaohsiung, Taiwan
81.5
75th: 111.5; Max: 232.0
Wilhelm and Ritz (2005, 088668)
Los Angeles, CA
38.1
Max: 74.6-103.7
Woodruff et al. (2008, 098386)
U.S.
Range of means across effects: 28.6-29.8°
Avg of means across effects: 29.1°
75th: 33.8-36.5
Yang et al. (2006, 090760)
Taipei, Taiwan
53.2
75th: 64.9; Max: 234.9
8Median concentration
In contrast, Bell et al. (2007, 093256) reported positive associations for both PM2.5 and
PM10 with birth weight in a study of births (n = 358,504) in Connecticut and Massachusetts
(1999-2002). Birth data indicated county, not street address or ZIP code, so women were
assigned exposure based on county residence at delivery. The difference in birth weight per
10 pg/m3 associated with PM2.5 was -66.8 (95% CP 77.7 to -55.9) gm. For PM10 it was -11.1
(95% CP -15.0 to -7.2) gm. The increased risk for low birth weight was OR = 1.054 (95% CP
1.022-1.087) for PM2.5 and OR = 1.027 (95% CP 0.991-1.064) for PM10, based on average
exposure during pregnancy. Reductions in birth weight were also associated with third
trimester exposure to PM10 and second and third trimester exposure to PM2.5. Comparing
this study to Maisonet et al. (2001, 016624), a larger sample size was able to detect a small
increase in risk. In addition, birth weight was reduced more by exposure to PM2.5 than by
exposure to PM10. Measured PM2.5 concentrations were not available in the earlier study.
The Children's Health Study is a population based cohort of children living in 12
southern California communities, selected on the basis of differing levels of air pollution
(Salam et al., 2005, 087885). as previously discussed in Section 7.3. The children in grades
4, 7 and 10 were recruited through schools. A subset of this cohort (n = 6,259) were born in
California from 1975-1987. Of these, birth certificates were located for 4,842, including
3,901 infants born at term and 72 cases of low birth weight at term. Using the mother's ZIP
code at the time of birth, exposure was determined by inverse distance weighting of up to 3
PM10 monitors within 50 km of the ZIP code centroid. If there was a PM10 monitor within 5
km of the ZIP code centroid (40% of data), exposure from that monitor was used. Exposure
was calculated for the entire pregnancy, and for each trimester of pregnancy. A 10 pg/m3
increase in PM10 during the third trimester reduced mean birth weight -10.9 g (95% CP
-21.1 to -0.6) in single pollutant models, but became non-significant in multipollutant
models controlling for the effects of O3. Increased risks of low birth weight (<2500 gm) were
not statistically significant (OR = 1.3 [95% CP 0.9-1.9]). A strength of this study was the
cohort data available included information on SES and smoking during pregnancy. A
July 2009
7-66
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
limitation is the assignment of exposure based on monitoring stations up to 50 km distant!
this may have introduced significant exposure misclassification obscuring some
associations.
Parker et al. examined births in California within 5 miles of a monitoring station
(n = 18,247) (Parker et al., 2005, 087462). Only infants born at 40 wk gestation were
included. Thus all infants were the same gestational age, and had been exposed in the same
year. Exposure to PM2.5 in quartiles (<11.9, 11.9-13.9, 14.0-18.4, >18.4) was associated with
decrements in birth weight. Infants exposed to >13.9 pg/m3 experienced reductions in birth
weight (third quartile -13.7 g (95% CP -34.2 to 6.9), fourth quartile -36.1 g (95% CP -55.8 to
-16.5). These are larger reductions than have been seen in some other studies. However,
this study reduced misclassification by including only women living within 5 miles of a
monitoring station, and only included births at 40 wk gestation. Reducing misclassification
should lead to a stronger association, if the association is causal.
The effects of spatial variation in exposure were also investigated by Wilhelm and
Ritz (2005, 088668). Their study included all women living in ZIP codes where 60% of the
ZIP code was within two miles of a monitoring station in the Southern California Basin,
and women with known addresses in Los Angeles County within 4 miles of a monitoring
station. Exposure to average PM10 in the third trimester was analyzed for increased risk of
low birth weight at term (> 37~wk gestation). Analysis at the ZIP code level did not detect
increased risk (per 10 pg/m3 PM10, OR = 1.03 [95% CP 0.97-1.09]). However the analysis
based on geocoded addresses indicated that increasing exposure to PM10 was associated
with increased risk of low birth weight for women living within 1 mile of the station where
PM10 was measured. For these women (n = 247 cases, 10,981 non-cases), each 10 pg/m3
increase in PM10 was associated with a 22% increase in risk of term low birth weight
(OR = 1.22 [95% CP 1.05-1.41]). In the categorical analysis, exposure to PM10 >44.4 pg/m3
was associated with a 48% increase in risk (OR = 1.48 [95% CP 1.00-2.19]). Increased risk
of low birth weight also was associated with exposure to CO in single pollutant models.
However, when multipollutant models were considered, the effects of CO were attenuated
but the effects of PM10 increased. Controlling for CO, NO2, and O3, each 10 pg/m3 increase
in exposure to PM10 increased risk of low birth weight 36% (OR = 1.36 [95% CP 1.12-1.65]).
Spatial variation in PM2.5 exposure was investigated by Basu et al. (2004, 087896).
They included only mothers who lived within 5 miles of a PM2.5 monitor and within a
California county with at least one monitor. To minimize potential confounding, they
included only white (n = 8597) or Hispanic (n = 8114) women, who were married, between
20-30 years of age, completed at least high school and were having their first child.
Consistently, PM2.5 exposure measured by the county monitor was more strongly associated
with reductions in birth weight than exposure measured by the neighborhood monitor. The
results were replicated in both the white and the Hispanic samples. Reductions in birth
weight ranged from 15.2 g to 43.5 g per 10 pg/m3 increase in PM2.5.
July 2009
7-67
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
In the remaining U.S. study, Chen et al. (2002, 024945) analyzed 33,859 birth
certificates of residents of Washoe County in northern Nevada (1991-1999). There were four
sites monitoring PMio during the study period, it appears (not stated) that exposure was
averaged over the county. A 10 pg/m3 increase in exposure to PMio during the third
trimester of pregnancy was associated with an 11 gm reduction in birth weight (95% CP
¦2.3 to -19.8). Effects on risk of low birth weight were not significant. For exposure in the
third trimester of 19.77 to 44.74 pg/m3 compared to <19.74 pg/m3 the odds ratio for low
birth weight was 1.05 (95% CP 0.81-1.36). Comparing exposure >44.74 to the same
reference category, the odds ratio was 1.10 (95% CP 0.71-1.71). Misclassification of exposure
may have occurred when exposure was averaged over a large geographic area (16,968 km2).
Recent international studies investigating effects of particles on low birth weight
include one in Munich (Slama et al., 2007, 093216), two in Canada (Brauer et al., 2008,
156292; Dugandzic RDodds et al., 2006, 088681), two in Australia (Hansen et al., 2007,
090703; Mannes et al., 2005, 087895), two in Taiwan (Lin et al., 2004, 089827; Yang et al.,
2003, 087886) one in Korea (Ha et al., 2003, 042552) and two in Sao Paulo, Brazil (Gouveia
et al., 2004, 055613; Medeiros and Gouveia, 2005, 089824). The majority of these studies
found that PM concentrations were associated with low birth weight, though two studies
(Hansen et al., 2007, 090703; Lin et al., 2004, 089827) found no associations. The effect
estimates were similar in magnitude to those reported in the U.S. studies.
Issues in Interpreting Results of Low Birth Weight Studies
Studies included subjects at distances from monitoring stations varying from as close
as 1 mile or 2 km, to as far as 50 km or the size of the county. However, studies that only
included subjects living within a short distance (l mile, 2 km) of the monitoring station
(thus likely reducing exposure measurement error) were more likely to find that PM
exposure was associated with increased risk of low birth weight. However, Basu et al.
(2004, 087896) reported a stronger association between PM2.5 exposure and birth weight
when exposure was estimated based on the county monitor, rather than the monitor within
5 miles of the residence. They suggest that county level exposure may be more
representative of where women spend their time, including not only home, but also other
time spent away from home. Other pollutants also appeared to influence the risk associated
with particle exposure. In one study, exposure to PMio in a single pollutant model reduced
birth weight by 11 g, but became non-significant in multipollutant models with O3 (Salam et
al., 2005, 087885). In another study the risk associated with PMio exposure increased from
22% to 36% when other pollutants were included in the model (Wilhelm and Ritz, 2005,
088668). All but one study in the U.S. found some association between particle exposure
and reduced birth weight (Maisonet et al., 2001, 016624). The results of international
studies were inconsistent. This might be related to the chemical composition of particles in
the U.S., or to differences in the pollutant mixture. Studies with null results must be
July 2009
7-68
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
interpreted with caution when the comparison groups have significant exposure. This was
certainly the situation in studies in Taiwan and Korea (Lee et al., 2003, 043202; Lin et al.,
2004, 089827; Yang et al., 2003, 087886). Differences in geographical locations, study
samples and linkage decisions may contribute to the diverse findings in the literature on
the association between PM and birthweight, even within the U.S. (Parker and Woodruff,
2008, 156846).
Preterm Birth
A potential association of exposure to airborne particles and preterm birth has been
investigated in numerous epidemiologic studies, including some conducted in the U.S. and
others in foreign countries. Three U.S. studies have been carried out by the same group of
investigators in California.
A natural experiment occurred when an open-hearth steel mill in Utah Valley was
closed from August 1986 through September 1987. Parker et al. (2008, 156013) compared
birth outcomes for Utah mothers within and outside of the Utah Valley, before, during, and
after the mill closure. They report that mothers who were pregnant around the time of the
closure of the mill were less likely to deliver prematurely than mothers who were pregnant
before or after. The strongest effect estimates were observed for exposure during the second
trimester (14% decrease in risk of preterm birth during mill closure). Preterm birth outside
of the Utah Valley did not change during the time of the mill closure.
In 2000, Ritz et al. (2000, 012068) published the first study investigating the
association of preterm birth with PM in the U.S. The study population was women living in
the southern California Basin. There were 8 monitoring stations measuring PMio every
sixth day during the study period. Birth certificates (1989-1993) were analyzed for women
living in zip codes within 2 miles of a monitoring station. Women with multiple gestations,
chronic disease prior to pregnancy and women who delivered by cesarean section were
excluded resulting in a study population of 48,904 women. The risk of preterm birth
increased by 4% (RR = 1.04 [95% CP 1.02-1.6]) per 10 pg/m3 increase in PMio averaged in
the 6 wk before birth. Exposure to PMio in the first month of pregnancy resulted in a 3%
increase in risk (RR = 1.03 [95% CP 1.01-1.05]). These results were robust in multipollutant
models.
Wilhelm and Ritz (2005, 088668) reinvestigated this association among women in the
same area in 2005, when air pollution had declined from a mean level near 50 pg/m3 to a
mean level near 40 pg/m3. Birth certificate data from 1994-2000 was analyzed for women
living in ZIP codes within 2 miles of a monitoring station, or with addresses within 5 miles
of the monitoring station. No significant effects of exposure to PMio were reported.
Exposure to PM2.5 6 wk before birth resulted in an increase in preterm birth (RR = 1.19
[95% CP 1.02-1.40]) for the highest quartile of exposure (PM2.5 >24.3 pg/m3). Using a
July 2009
7-69
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
continuous measure of PM2.5, there was a 10% increase in risk for each 10 pg/m3 increase in
PM2.5 (RR = 1.10 [95% CI: 1.00-1.21]).
There have been two major criticisms of air pollution studies using birth certificate
data. First, that birth certificates only indicate the address at birth and the exposure of
women who moved during pregnancy may be misclassified! second, that information about
some important confounders may not be available (e.g., smoking). To obtain more precise
information about these variables, Ritz et al. (2007, 096146) conducted a case control study
nested within a cohort of birth certificates (Jan 2003-Dec 2003) in Los Angeles County.
Births to women residing in ZIP codes (n = 24) close to monitoring stations or major
population centers or roadways (n = 87) were eligible (n = 58,316 births). All cases of low
birth weight or preterm birth and an equal number of randomly sampled controls in the 24
zip codes close to monitors were selected. In the other 87 ZIP codes, 30% of cases and an
equal number of controls were randomly sampled. Of 6,374 women selected for the case
control study, 2,543 (40%) were interviewed. The association of preterm birth with exposure
to PM2.5 differed between women responding to the survey and women who did not respond.
Among responders, exposure to each 10 pg/m3 increase in PM2.5 concentration in the first
trimester increased risk to preterm birth by 23% (RR = 1.23 [95% CP 1.02-1.48]). There was
no increase in risk among non-responders (RR = 0.95 [95% CP 0.82-1.10]), or in the entire
birth cohort (RR = 1.00 [95% CP 0.94-1.07]).
An additional case control study of preterm birth and PM2.5 exposure Huynh et al.
(2006, 091240) used California birth certificate data. Singleton preterm infants (24-36-wk
gestation) born in California (1999-2000) whose mothers lived within 5 miles of a PM2.5
monitor were eligible. Each of these 10,673 preterm infants were matched to three term
(39-44-wk gestation) controls (having a last menstrual period within 2 wk of the case
infant), resulting in a study population of 42,692. Controlling for maternal race/ethnicity,
education, marital status, parity and CO exposure, exposure to PM2.5 >17.7 pg/m3 increased
the risk of preterm birth by 14% (OR = 1.14 [95% CP 1.07-1.23]). Averaging PM2.5 exposure
over the first month of pregnancy, the last 2 wk before birth, or the entire pregnancy did not
substantially change the risk estimate.
Two additional studies of preterm birth and exposure to particulate air pollution have
been conducted in the U.S. Each has used a unique methodology. Sagiv et al. (2005, 087468)
used time series to analyze births in four Pennsylvania counties between January 1997 and
December 2001. In this analysis, exposure to PM10 is compared to the rate of preterm births
each day. Both acute exposure (on the day of birth) and longer term exposure (average
exposure for the preceding six weeks) were considered in the analysis. An advantage of this
analysis is that days, rather than individuals are compared, so confounding by individual
risk factors is minimized. For exposure averaged over the 6 wk prior to birth, there was a
non-significant increase in risk (RR = 1.07 [95% CP 0.98-1.18]); for acute exposure with a 2
July 2009
7-70
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
day lag (RR = 1.10 [95% CI: 1.00-1.21]) and 5 day lag (RR = 1.07 95% CI: 0.98-1.18]) results
were marginal.
Rogers and Dunlop (2006, 091232) examined exposure to particles and risk of delivery
of an infant weighing less than 1500 g (all of which were preterm) from 24 counties in
Georgia. The study included 69 preterm small for gestational age (SGA) infants, 59 preterm
appropriate for gestational age (AGA) infants and 197 term AGAcontrols. Exposure was
estimated using an environmental transport model that considered PMio emissions from 32
geographically located industrial point sources, meteorological factors, and geographic
location of the birth home. Exposure was categorized by quartiles. Comparing women who
delivered a preterm AGA infant to those who delivered a term AGA infant, exposure to
PMio>15.07 pg/m3 tripled the risk (OR = 3.68 [95% CI: 1.44-9.44]).
Brauer et al. (2008, 156292) evaluated the impacts of PM2.5 on preterm birth using
spatiotemporal exposure metrics in Vancouver, Canada. The authors found similar results
when they used a land-use regression model or inverse distance weighting as the exposure
metric. For preterm births <37 wk, they reported an OR of 1.06 (95% CI: 1.01-1.11), and for
preterm births <35 wk the OR increased to 1.12 (95% CI: 1.02-1.24). There were no
consistent trends for early or late gestational period to be more strongly associated with
preterm births.
Suh et al. (2008, 192077) conducted a study to determine if the effects of exposure to
PM10 during pregnancy on preterm delivery are modified by maternal polymorphisms in
metabolic genes. They analyzed the effects of the gene-environment interaction between the
GSTM1, GSTT1, CYPlal-T6235C and -1462V polymorphisms and exposure to PM10 during
pregnancy on preterm birth in a case-control study in Seoul, Korea. PM10 concentration >
75th percentile alone was significant in the third trimester fo pregnancy (OR = 2.33 [95%
CI: 1.33-4.80]), but not in the first or second trimester. The risk of preterm delivery
conferred by the GSTM1 null genotype was increased, and the highest risk was found
during the third trimester of pregnancy (OR = 2.58 [95% CI: 1.34-4.97]). There were no
statistical associations with the GSTT1 or CYP1A1 genotypes. When the gene-environment
interaction was analyzed, the risk for preterm birth was significantly higher for women who
carried the GSTM1 null genotype and were exposed to high levels of PM10 (> 75th
percentile) than for those who carried the GSTM1 positive genotype but were only exposed
to low levels of PM10 (<75th percentile) during the third trimester of pregnancy (OR = 6.22,
95% CI: 2.14-18.08).
In Incheon, Korea, Leem et al. (2006, 089828) estimated PM10 exposure spatially as
well as temporally. Exposure was based on 26 monitors and kriging was used to determine
exposure for 120 dongs (administrative districts, mean area 7.82 km2, median area 1.42
km3). The sample included 52,113 births, from 2001-2002. PM10 was very weakly correlated
with other pollutants. Exposure was compared in quartiles for the first and third trimester
of pregnancy. In the first trimester, relative risks for the second, third and fourth quartiles
July 2009
7-71
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
were RR = 1.14 (95% CI: 0.97-1.34), RR = 1.07 (95% CI: 0.94-1.37), and RR = 1.24 (95% CI:
1.09-1.41), respectively. Exposure to PMio in quartile one (reference group) was 26.9 -
45.9 pg/m3; fourth quartile exposure equaled 64.6-106.4 pg/m3. The p-value for trend was
0.02. Exposure in the third trimester was not related to preterm birth, however no
information was provided to determine how exposure in the third trimester was adjusted
for women who delivered preterm.
Two studies investigating risks of preterm birth related to particle exposure have
been reported from Australia. In Brisbane, Hansen et al. (2006, 089818) studied 28,200
births (2000-2003) in an area of low PMio concentrations. Exposure to an interquartile
range increase in PMio exposure in the first trimester resulted in a 15% increased risk of
preterm birth (OR = 1.15 [95% CI: 1.06-1.25]). This result was strongly influenced by the
effect of PMio exposure in the first month of pregnancy (OR = 1.19 [95% CI: 1.13-1.26]).
PMio was correlated with ozone r = (0.77) in this study and ozone also increased risk in the
first trimester. No effects were associated with exposure to PMio in the third trimester.
In Sydney, associations between exposure to particles and preterm birth varied by
season. Jalaludin et al. (2007, 156601) obtained information on all births in metropolitan
Sydney (1998-2000). Exposure to PM2.5 in the three months preceding birth was associated
with an increased risk of preterm birth (OR = 1.11 [95% CI: 1.04-1.19]). Additional effects
were dependent on season of conception. Both PMio (OR = 1.3 95% CI: 1.2-1.5]) and PM2.5
(OR = 1.4 [95% CI: 1.3-1.6]) were associated with increased risk for conceptions in the
winter. Conceptions in summer were associated with reductions in risk (PMio OR = 0.91
[95% CI: 0.88-0.93]) (PM2.5 OR = 0.87 [95% CI: 0.84-0.92]). Due to both positive and
negative findings, the authors recommend caution in interpreting their results.
Issues in Analyzing Environmental Exposures and Preterm Birth
A major issue in studying environmental exposures and preterm birth is selecting the
relevant exposure period, since the biological mechanisms leading to preterm birth and the
critical periods of vulnerability are poorly understood (Bobak, 2000, 011448). Exposures
proximate to the birth may be most relevant if exposure causes an acute effect. However,
exposure occurring in early gestation might affect placentation, with results observable
later in pregnancy, or cumulative exposure during pregnancy may be the most important
determinate. The studies reviewed have dealt with this issue in different ways. Many have
considered several exposure metrics based on different periods of exposure.
Often the time periods used are the first month (or first trimester) of pregnancy and
the last month (or six weeks) prior to delivery. Using a time interval prior to delivery
introduces an additional problem since cases and controls are not in the same stage of
development when they are compared. For example, a preterm infant delivered at 36 wk, is
a 32 wk fetus 4 wk prior to birth, while an infant born at term (40 wk) is a 36 wk fetus 4 wk
prior to birth. Only one study (Huynh et al., 2006, 091210) adjusted for this in the design.
July 2009
7-72
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
Many of these studies compare exposure in quartiles, using the lowest quartile as the
reference (or control) group. No studies use a truly unexposed control group. If exposure in
the lowest quartile confers risk, than it may be difficult to demonstrate additional risk
associated with a higher quartile. Thus negative studies must be interpreted with caution.
Preterm birth occurs both naturally (idiopathic preterm), and as a result of medical
intervention (iatrogenic preterm). Ritz et al. (2000, 012068S 2007, 096146) excluded all
births by Cesarean section, to limit their studies to idiopathic preterm. No other studies
attempted to distinguish the type of preterm birth, although PM exposure maybe associated
with only one type. This is a source of potential effect misclassification.
Growth Restriction
Low birth weight has often been used as an outcome measure because it is easily
available and accurately recorded on birth certificates. However, low birth weight may
result from either short gestation, or inadequate growth in utero. Most of the studies
investigating air pollution exposure and low birth weight, limited their analysis to term
infants to focus on inadequate growth. A number of studies were identified that specifically
addressed growth restriction in utero by identifying infants who failed to meet specific
growth standards. Usually these infants had birth weights less than the 10th percentile for
gestational age, using an external standard. Many of these studies have been previously
discussed, since they also examined other reproductive outcomes (low birth weight or
preterm delivery).
Three studies in the U.S. examined intrauterine growth. A recent study (Rich et al.,
2009, 180122) investigated very small for gestational age (defined as a fetal growth ratio
<0.75), small for gestational age (defined as > 75 and <85) and "reference" births (> 85) to
women residing in New Jersey and mean air pollutant concentrations during the first,
second and third trimesters. They reported an increased risk of SGA associated with first
and third trimester PM2.5 concentrations (1.116 [95% CP 1.012, 1.232], and 1.106 [1.008-
1.212], per 10 |ug/m3 PM2.5, respectively). Parker et al. (2005, 087462) reported a positive
association between exposure to PM2.5. Since this study only included singleton live births
at 40-wk gestation, birth weights less than 2872 g for girls and 2986 g for boys were
designated SGA, based on births in California. Infants exposed to the highest quartile PM2.5
(>18.4 pg/m3) compared to the lowest quartile PM2.5 (<11.9 pg/m3) were 23% more likely to
be small for gestational age (OR = 1.23 [95% CP 1.03-1.50]). Very similar results were found
for exposure in each of the three trimesters respectively (OR = 1.26 [95% CP 1.04-1.51],
OR = 1.24 [95% CP 1.04-1.49], OR = 1.21 [95% CP 1.02-1.43]). These results controlled for
exposure to CO, which did not increase risk for SGA.
In contrast, Salam et al. (2005, 087885) found no association between exposure to
PM10 and intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) in the California Children's Health
Study. IUGR was defined as less than the 15th percentile of predicted birth weight based on
July 2009
7-73
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
gestational age and sex in term infants. Apparently no external standard was used since
15% of infants in the study were designated as IUGR. An IQR increase in PMio exposure
was not significantly associated with IUGR for the whole pregnancy (OR =1.1 [95% CP 0.9-
1.3]) or for any specific trimester. Differences between this study and the study by Parker et
al. (2005, 087462) include measurement of PMio vs. PM2.5, a less stringent definition of
IUGR, and exposures determined by monitors located much farther away from the subjects'
residences (up to 50 km vs. within 5 miles). All of these factors could lead to
misclassification.
Two studies investigating particle exposure and SGA were conducted in Australia,
with differing results (Hansen et al., 2007, 090703; Mannes et al., 2005, 087895). Mannes et
al. (2005, 087895) defined SGA as birth weight less than two standard deviations below the
national mean birth weight for gestational age. In this study there was a statistically
significant effect of exposure to both PMio (OR = 1.10 [95% CP 1.00-1.48], per 10 pg/m3
increase) and PM2.5 (OR = 1.34 [95% CP 1.10-1.63], per 10 pg/m3 increase) for exposure
during the second trimester. When analysis was restricted to births within 5 km of the
monitoring station, the association for PMio became slightly stronger (OR = 1.22 [95% CP
1.10-1.34]). Exposure during other trimesters of pregnancy was not associated with IUGR.
In Brisbane, Hansen et al. (2007, 090703) examined head circumference (HC), crown
heel length (CHL) and risk of SGA, defined as less than the tenth percentile of weight for
gestational age and gender based on an Australian national standard. There was no
consistent relationship between PMio exposure and SGA, HC or CHL in any trimester of
pregnancy. PMio exposure was determined by averaging values from the five monitoring
stations. Due to the sample size and limited number of monitoring stations, it was not
possible to analyze the data for women living within 5 km of a monitoring station, as was
done in Sydney.
In Canada, Liu et al. (2007, 090429) investigated the effect of PM2.5 exposure on fetal
growth in three cities, Calgary, Edmonton and Montreal. Intrauterine growth retardation
(IUGR) was defined as birth weight below the tenth percentile, by sex and gestational week
(37-42) for all singleton live births in Canada between 1986 and 2000. Models were
adjusted for maternal age, parity, infant sex, season of birth, city of residence, and year of
birth. A 10 pg/m3 increase in PM2.5 was associated with an increased risk for IUGR
(OR = 1.07 [95% CP 1.03-1.10]) in the first trimester, and similar risks were associated with
exposure in the second or third trimesters. The effect of PM2.5 was reduced in
multipollutant models including CO and NO2.
Brauer et al. (2008, 156292) observed consistent increased risks of SGA for PM2.5,
PMio, NO2, NO and CO in Vancouver, Canada (20% increase in risk in PM2.5 and PMio per
10 pg/m3 increase). The effects were similar for exposure estimates based on nearest
monitor, inverse distance weighting, and land-use regression modeling. ORs for early or
July 2009
7-74
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
late pregnancy exposure windows were remarkably similar to those for the full duration of
pregnancy
Birth Defects
Four recent studies examined PM and birth defects. The Seoul, Korea study discussed
above also considered congenital anomalies, defined as a defect in the child's body structure
(Kim et al., 2007, 156642). PMio levels were associated with higher risk of birth defects for
the second trimester, with a 16% (95% CP 0-34) increase in risk per 10 jug/m3 in PMio.
Two U.S. studies examined air pollution and risk of birth defects. Data were collected
from the California Birth Defects Monitoring Program for four counties in Southern
California (Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Orange) for the period 1987 to
1993, although each county included a subset of this period (Ritz et al., 2002, 023227).
Cases (i.e., infants with birth defects) were identified as live birth infants and fetal deaths
from 2()-wk gestation to 1 year post birth, with isolated, multiple, syndrome, or
chromosomal cardiac or orofacial cleft defects. Cases were restricted to those with registry
data for gestational age and residence zip code, and those with residences <10 miles from
an air pollution monitor. Six types of categories were included: aortic defects! atrium and
atrium septum defects! endocrinal and mitral value defects! pulmonary artery and valve
defects! conotruncal defects! and ventricular septal defects not part of the conotruncal
category. PMio measurements were available every six days. While results indicated
increased risk of birth defects for higher levels of CO or O3, the authors determined that
results for PMio were inconclusive, finding no consistent trend of effect after adjustment for
CO and O3.
The other U.S. study examined birth defects through a case-control design in seven
Texas counties for the period 1997 to 2000 (Gilboa et al., 2005, 087892). Births were
excluded for parents <18 years and several non-air pollution risk factors known to be
associated with birth defects (e.g., maternal diabetes, holoprosencephaly in addition to oral
clef). Comparison of the highest (> 29.0 |u.g/m3) and lowest (<19.521 jug/m3) quartiles of PMio
for exposure defined as the third to eighth weeks of pregnancy generated an OR of 2.27
(95% CP 1.43-3.60) for risk of isolated artrial septal defects and 1.26 (95% CP 1.03-1.55) for
individual artrial septal defects. Including other pollutants (CO, NO2, O3, SO2) in the model
did not greatly alter results! numerical results for co-pollutant analysis were not provided.
Strong evidence was not observed for a relationship between PMio and the other birth
defect categories. Review articles have concluded that the scientific literature is not
sufficient to conclude a relationship between air pollution and birth defects (Sram et al.,
2005, 087442).
A recent study of oral clefts conducted in Taiwan found no association between this
birth defect and concentrations of PMio during the first or second gestational month
July 2009
7-75
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
(Hwang et al., 2006, 088971). This population-based case-control study included 653 cases
and a random sample of 6,530 controls born in Taiwan between 2001 and 2003.
Infant Mortality
Many studies have identified strong associations between exposure to particles and
increased risk of mortality in adults or the general population, including for short- and
long-term exposure (see Section 7.6). Less evidence is available for the potential impact on
infant mortality, although studies have been conducted in several countries. The results of
these infant mortality studies are presented here with the other reproductive and
developmental outcomes because it is likely that in vitro exposures contribute to this
outcome. Both long-term and short-term exposure studies of infant mortality are included
in this section. Results on PM and infant mortality includes a range of findings, with some
studies finding associations and many non-statistically significant or null effects. Yet, more
consistency is observed when results are divided into the type of health outcome based on
the age of infant and cause of death.
An important question regarding the association between PM and infant mortality is
the critical window of exposure during development for which infants are susceptible.
Several age structures have been explored: infants (<1 year); neonatal (<1 month); and
postneonatal (l month to 1 year). Within these various age categories, multiple causes of
deaths have been investigated, particularly total deaths and respiratory-related deaths.
The studies reflect a variety of study designs, particle size ranges, exposure periods,
regions, and adjustment for confounders.
Stillbirth
Only one study of stillbirths and PM was identified. A prospective cohort of pregnant
women in Seoul, Korea from 2001 to 2004 was examined with respect to exposure to PMio
(Kim et al., 2007, 156642). Gestational age was estimated by the last menstrual period or
by ultrasound. Whereas many of the previously discussed studies of PM and pregnancy
outcomes were based on national registries, this study examined medical records and
gathered individual information through interviews on socio-economic condition, medical
history, pregnancy complications, smoking, second-hand smoke exposure, and alcohol use.
Mother's exposure to PMio was based on residence for each month of pregnancy, each
trimester defined as a three month period, and the six weeks prior to death. Exposure was
assigned by the nearest monitor. A 10 ug/m3 increase in PMio in the third trimester was
associated with an 8% (95% CP 2-14) increase in risk of stillbirth.
In Sao Paulo, Brazil, Poisson regression of stillbirth counts for the period 1991 and
1992 found that a 10 |ug/m3 increase in PMio was associated with a 0.8% increase in
stillbirth rates (Pereira et al., 1998, 007264). When other pollutants (NO2, SO2, CO, O3)
were included simultaneously in the model, the association did not remain. Stillbirths were
defined as fetal loss at >28 wk of pregnancy age, weight >1000 g, or length of fetus >35 cm.
July 2009
7-76
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
As discussed below, there exists some limited evidence for a link between PM and
stillbirth.
Infant Mortality and Infant Respiratory Mortality, < lYear
A literature search did not reveal new studies on PM and infant mortality (<1 year)
since the previous PM AQCD. Previously conducted studies include a case-control study
that reported associations between infant mortality and TSP levels over the period between
birth and death for infants in the Czech Republic (Bobak and Leon, 1999, 007678). An
ecological study evaluated U.S. PMio data for the year 1990 using long-term pollution levels
in 180 U.S. counties (Lipfert et al., 2000, 004103). The authors found a 9.64% (95% CP 4.60-
14.9) increase in risk of infant mortality for non-low birth weight infants per 10 ug/m3
increase in PMio, a 13.4% (95% CP -10.3 to 43.5%) increase in non-low birth weight
respiratory-disease related deaths (ICD-9 460-519) and a 19.5% (95% CP 0.07-42.8)
increase in all non-low birth weight respiratory-related infant deaths (ICD 9 460-519, 769,
770).
Neonatal Mortality and Neonatal Respiratory Mortality, < 1 month
Studies on PM and neonatal mortality (<1 month) included a time-series analysis of
PMio for four years of data (1998-2000) for Sao Paulo, Brazil (Lin et al., 2004, 095787). The
analysis used daily counts of deaths from government registries and adjusted for temporal
trend, day of the week, weather, and holidays. Findings indicated that a 10 ug/m3 increase
in PMio was associated with a 1.71% (95% CP 0.31-3.32) increase in risk of neonatal death.
A case-crossover study of 11 years (1989-2000) in Southern California did not find an
association between PMio and neonatal deaths (Ritz et al., 2006, 089819). Quantitative
results were not provided. The authors considered adjustment for season, county, parity,
gender, prenatal care, and maternal age, education, and race/ethnicity. The overall levels of
PMio in these studies were similar.
These results add to previous work on PM and neonatal death, including studies
identifying higher risk of neonatal mortality with higher TSP in the Czech Republic in an
ecological analysis (Bobak and Leon, 1992, 044415) and case-crossover study (Bobak and
Leon, 1999, 007678), and a Poisson model study in Kagoshima City, Japan (Shinkura et al.,
1999, 156978). An ecological study evaluated U.S. PMio data for the year 1990 using long-
term pollution levels in 180 U.S. counties (Lipfert et al., 2000, 001103). Analysis considered
birth weight, sex, month of birth, location by state and county, prenatal care, and mother's
race, age, educational level, marital status, and smoking status. County-level variables
were included for socio-economic status, altitude, and climate. Results indicate a 13.1%
increase in neonatal mortality (95% CP 4.4-22.6) per 10 jug/m3 PMio for non-low birth
weight infants. Statistically significant associations were also observed considering all
infants or low birth weight infants. However, higher levels of SO2 were associated with
lower risk of infant mortality. When sulfate and an estimate of non-sulfate particles were
July 2009
7-77
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
included in the regression simultaneously, associations were observed with non-sulfate
particles and an inverse relationship with sulfate particles. Respiratory neonatal mortality
was not associated with higher TSP in the Czech Republic case-control study (Bobak and
Leon, 1999, 007678).
Postneonatal Mortality and Post-neonatal Respiratory Mortality, 1 Month-1 Year
Several studies have been conducted on PM and postneonatal mortality since the
previous PM AQCD, including three from the U.S., one from Mexico, and three from Asia.
Two case-control studies examined the risk of PM to postneonatal death in California.
Research focused on Southern California for the period 1989 to 2000 linked birth and death
certificates and considered PMio two months prior to death with adjustment for prenatal
care, gender, parity, county, season, and mother's age, race/ethnicity, and education (Ritz et
al., 2006, 089819). As previously noted, this study did not find an association between PMio
and neonatal mortality (<1 month), however an association was observed for postneonatal
mortality, with a 10 |ug/m3 increase in PMio associated with a 4% (95% CP 1-6) increase in
risk. The exposure period of 2 wk before death was also considered, producing effect
estimates of 5% (95% CP 1-10) for the same PMio increment. Even larger effect estimates
were observed for those who died at ages 4 to 12 months. When CO, NO2, and O3 were
simultaneously included with PMio in the model, the central estimate reduced to 2% for the
2-week exposure period and 4% for the 2-month exposure period, and both estimates lost
statistical significance. The other case-control study of California considered PM2.5 from
1999 to 2000 for infants born to mothers within five miles of a PM2.5 monitoring station
(Woodruff et al., 2006, 088758). Infants who died during the postneonatal period were
matched to infants with date of birth within two weeks and birth weight category. Exposure
was estimated from the time of birth to death. Models considered parity and maternal race,
education, age, and martial status. A 10 |ug/m3 increase in PM2.5 was associated with a 7%
(95% CP -7 to 24) increase in postneonatal death
County-level PMio and PM2.5 for the first two months of life for births in urban U.S.
counties (> 250,000 residents) from 1999 to 2002 were evaluated in relation to postneonatal
mortality with GEE models (Woodruff et al., 2008, 098386). Analyses were adjusted for
primiparity (first born), community-level poverty, region, month, year, and mother's race,
marital status, education, and age. Births were restricted to singleton births with
gestational age < 44 wk, same county of residence at birth and death, and non-missing data
on birth order, birth weight, and maternal race, education, and martial status. Higher
levels of either PM metric were associated with higher risk of postneonatal mortality, with
4% (95% CP -1 to 10) increase in mortality risk per 10 jug/m3 in PMio and 4% (95% CP -2
to 11) increase in mortality risk for the same increment of PM2.5. This work builds on a
previous study of 86 U.S. urban areas from 1989 to 1991, finding a 4% (95% CP 2-7)
increase in postneonatal mortality per 10 ug/m3 county-level PMio over the first two months
of life (Woodruff et al., 1997, 084271).
July 2009
7-78
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
In Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, a case-crossover approach was applied to data from 1997 to
2001 based on death certificates and the cumulative PMio for the day of death and previous
two days (Romieu et al., 2004, 093074). A case-crossover study of Kaohsiung, Taiwan from
1994-2000 compared the average of PMio on the day of death and two previous days to PMio
in control periods a week before and week after death (Tsai et al., 2006, 090709). A similar
approach was also applied to 1994 to 2000 data from Taipei, Taiwan, also using case-
crossover methods for the lag 0-2 PMio with referent periods the week before and after
death (Yang et al., 2006, 090760). In these case-crossover studies, season was addressed
through matching in the study design. A 10 ug/m3 increase in PMio was associated with a
2.0% (95% CP -2.8 to 7.0) increase in the Mexico study, a 0.59 (95% CP -15.0 to 18.8)
increase in postneonatal death in the Kaohsiung study, and a 1.02% (95% CP -13.2 to 17.6)
increase in the Taipei study. A study in Seoul, South Korea from 1995 to 1999 used time-
series approaches adjusted for temporal trend and weather, based on national death
registries excluding accidental deaths (Ha et al., 2003, 042552). A 10 |ug/m3 increase in PMio
was associated with a 3.14% (95% CP 2.16-4.14) increase in risk of death for postneonates.
A subset of the studies examining postneonatal mortality also considered the subset of
postneonatal deaths from respiratory causes. These include the time-series study in South
Korea, finding a 17.8% (95% CP 14.4 to 21.2) increase in respiratory-mortality per 10 jug/m3
increase in PMio (Ha et al., 2003, 042552) and the case-crossover study in Mexico, for which
the same increment in PMio was associated with a 1.5% (95% CP -14.1 to 13.0) decrease in
risk (Romieu et al., 2004, 093074). Both case-control California studies identified
associations, with a 5% (l, 10%) increase in risk in Southern California (Ritz et al., 2006,
089819) and 57.4% (95% CP 7.0-132) increase in California per 10 |ug/m3 PMio (Woodruff et
al., 2006, 088758). The U.S. study found this increment in PMio to be linked with a 16%
(95% CP 6.0-28.0) increase in respiratory postneonatal mortality, although effect estimates
for PM2.5 were not statistically significant (Woodruff et al., 2008, 098386). Earlier studies on
respiratory-related postneonatal mortality include the study of 86 U.S. urban areas, finding
statistically significant effects (Woodruff et al., 1997, 084271).
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
Three studies examining the relationship between PM and sudden infant death
syndrome have been published from 2002 onward. These studies examined infant mortality
and were thereby discussed in this section previously. A case-control study over a 12-yr
period (1989 to 2000) matched 10 controls to deaths (cases) in Southern California (Ritz et
al., 2006, 089819). A 10 |u.g/m3 increase in PMio the two months prior to death was
associated with a 3% (95% CP -1 to 8) increased in SIDS. Adjusted for other pollutants (CO,
NO2, and O3), the effect estimate reduced to 1% (95% CP -5 to 7).
A case-control study, also based in California, found an OR of 1.008 (95% CP 1.006-
1.012) per 10 |u,g/m3 increase in PM2.5, considering a SIDS definition of ICD 10 R95
(Woodruff et al., 2006, 088758). Due to changes in SIDS diagnosis, another SIDS definition
July 2009
7-79
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
was explored for ICD 10 R99 in addition to ICD 10 R95. Under this SIDS definition, the
effect estimate changed to 1.03 (95% CI: 0.79-1.35). The authors also examined whether the
relationship between PM2.5 and SIDS differed by season, finding no significant difference.
PM10 and PM10-2.5 were not associated with risk of SIDS; numerical results were not
provided for these PM metrics. The third recent study of PM and SIDS examined U.S.
urban counties from 1999 to 2002 (Woodruff et al., 2008, 098386). Non-statistically
significant relationships were observed between SIDS and PM10 or PM2.5 in the first two
months of life.
These studies add to earlier work, such as a U.S. study that found higher risk of SIDS
with higher annual PM2.5 levels, including in a separate analysis of normal birth weight
infants (Lipfert et al., 2000, 001103). and a U.S. study identifying a 12% (95% CP 7-17)
increase in SIDS risk per 10 ug/ma in PM10 for the first two months of life for normal weight
births (Woodruff et al., 1997, 084271). A study based on Taiwan found higher SIDS risk
with lower visibility (Knobel et al., 1995, 155905), whereas a 12 city Canadian time-series
study identified no significant associations (Dales et al., 2004, 087342).
Deaths by SIDS were identified by different methods in the studies, partly due to
transition from ICD 9 to ICD 10, but also due to different choices within the research
design. Two studies examined multiple approaches (ICD 10 R95, ICD 10 R95 and R99)
(Woodruff et al., 2006, 088758; Woodruff et al., 2008, 098386), and other studies
investigated ICD 9 798.0 and ICD 10 R95 (Ritz and Wilhelm, 2008, 156914), ICD 9 798.0
(Woodruff et al., 1997, 084271). ICD 9 798.0 and 799.0 (Knobel et al., 1995, 155905), as well
as a sudden unexplained death of infant <1 year for which an autopsy did not identify a
specific cause of death (Dales et al., 2004, 087342). These variations in the definition of
health outcomes add to differences in populations and study designs.
Although some findings indicate a potential effect of PM on risk of SIDS, with the
strongest evidence perhaps from the case-control study in California (Woodruff et al., 2006,
088758), others do not find an effect or observe an uncertain association. For the
relationship between PM and SIDS, a 2004 review article concluded consistent evidence
exists compared to evidence for other infant mortality effects (Glinianaia et al., 2004,
087898), whereas other reviews found weaker or insufficient evidence (Heinrich and Slama,
2007, 156534). Another review concluded that the scientific literature on air pollution and
SIDS suggests an effect, but that further research is needed to draw a conclusion (Tong and
Colditz, 2004, 087883).
Comparisons across Studies and Key Issues
Comparison of results across studies can be challenging due to several issues,
including differences in methodologies, populations and study areas, pollution levels, and
the exposure timeframes used. Given the large variation in study designs, the methods to
address potential confounders vary. For example, weather and season were addressed in
July 2009
7-80
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
the case-control studies by matching, in the time-series study through non-linear functions
of temperature and temporal trend, and in the ecological study through county-level
variables. All studies included consideration of seasonality and weather. Researchers used
different definitions of respiratory-related deaths, including ICD 9 460-519 (Bobak and
Leon, 1999, 007678; Lipfert et al., 2000, 004103); ICD 9 460-519, 769-770 (Lipfert et al.,
2000, 004103); ICD 9 codes 460-519, 769, 770.4, 770.7, 770.8, 770.9, and ICD 10 J00-J98,
P22.0, P22.9, P27.1, P27.9, P28.0, P28.4, P28.5, and P28.9 (Ritz et al., 2006, 089819); and
ICD 9 460-519 and ICD 10 J00-J99 for any cause on death certificate (Romieu et al., 2004,
093074); ICD 10 J00-99 and P27.1 excluding J69.0 (Woodruff et al., 2006, 088758; Woodruff
et al., 2008, 098386); and ICD 9 460-519 (Woodruff et al., 1997, 084271).
Socioeconomic conditions were included at the individual level, typically maternal
education, in many studies (e.g.,Bobak and Leon, 1999, 007678; Ritz and Wilhelm, 2008,
156914; Ritz et al., 2006, 089819; Woodruff et al., 1997, 084271; Woodruff et al., 2006,
088758) and at the community-level in others (e.g.,Bobak and Leon, 1992, 044415; Penna
and Duchiade, 1991, 073325) or for both individual and community-level data (e.g.,Lipfert
et al., 2000, 001103). The time-series approach is unlikely to be confounded by
socioeconomic and other variables that do not exhibit day-to-day variation. Similarly, case-
crossover methods use each case as his/her own control, thereby negating the need for
individual-level confounders such as socioeconomic status (e.g.,Romieu et al., 2004, 093074;
Tsai et al., 2006, 090709; Yang et al., 2006, 090760). All studies published after 2001
incorporated individual-level socioeconomic data or were of case-crossover or time-series
design. One study specifically examined whether socioeconomic status modified the PM and
mortality relationship, dividing subjects into three socioeconomic strata based on the zip
code of residence at death (Romieu et al., 2004, 093074). This work, based in Mexico, found
that at lower socio-economic levels the association between PMio and postneonatal
mortality increased. Although the overall association showed higher risk of death with
higher PMio with statistical uncertainty, for the lowest socio-economic group, a 10 ug/ma
increment in cumulative PMio over the two days before death was associated with a 60%
(95% CP 3-149) increase in postneonatal death. A trend of higher effect for lower socio-
economic condition is observed in all three lag structures.
Studies differ in terms of the timeframe of pregnancy that was used to estimate
exposure. Exposure to PM for infant mortality (<1 year) was estimated as the levels
between birth and death (Bobak and Leon, 1999, 007678), annual community levels (Lipfert
et al., 2000, 004103; Penna and Duchiade, 1991, 073325) and the 3 to 5 days prior to death
(Loomis et al., 1999, 087288). For neonatal deaths, exposure timeframes considered were
the time between birth and death (Bobak and Leon, 1992, 044415; Bobak and Leon, 1999,
007678), annual levels (Bobak and Leon, 1999, 007678; Lipfert et al., 2000, 004103),
monthly levels (Shinkura et al., 1999, 156978), the same day concentrations (Lin et al.,
2004, 095787), and the two months or two weeks prior to death (Ritz et al., 2006, 089819).
July 2009
7-81
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Postneonatal mortality was associated with PM concentrations based on annual levels
(Bobak and Leon, 1992, 044415; Lipfert et al., 2000, 004103), between birth and death
(Bobak and Leon, 1999, 007678; Woodruff et al., 2006, 088758), two months before death
(Ritz et al., 2006, 089819), the first two months of life (Woodruff et al., 1997, 084271;
Woodruff et al., 2006, 088758), the day of death (Ha et al., 2003, 042552), and the average of
the same day as death and previous two days (Romieu et al., 2004, 093074; Tsai et al., 2006,
090709; Yang et al., 2006, 090760). Thus, no consistent window of exposure was identified
across the studies.
PMio concentrations were highest in South Korea (69.2 jug/m3) (Ha et al., 2003,
042552) and Taiwan (81.45 |ug/m3) (Tsai et al., 2006, 090709), and lowest in the U.S.
(29.1 |ug/m3) (Woodruff et al., 2008, 098386) and Japan (21.6 |u,g/m3) (Shinkura et al., 1999,
156978). All studies used community level exposure information based on ambient
monitors, as opposed to exposure measured at the individual level (e.g., subject's home) or
personal monitoring.
Given similar sources for multiple pollutants (e.g., traffic), disentangling the health
responses of co-pollutants is a challenge in the study of ambient air pollution. Several
studies examined multiple pollutants, most by estimating the effect of different pollutants
through several univariate models. Some studies noted the difficulty of separating particle
impacts from those of other pollutants, but noted stronger evidence for particles than other
pollutants (Bobak and Leon, 1999, 007678). A few studies applied co-pollutant models by
including multiple pollutants simultaneously in the same model. Effect estimates for the
relationship between PMio and neonatal deaths in Sao Paulo were reduced to a null effect
when SO2 was incorporated (Lin et al., 2004, 095787). Associations between PMio and
postneonatal mortality or respiratory postneonatal mortality remained but lost statistical
significance in a multiple pollutant model with CO, NO2, and O3 (Ritz et al., 2006, 089819).
July 2009
7-82
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Neonatal
Neonatal
Figure 7-5. Percent increase in postneonatal mortality per 10 yug/m3 in PMio, comparing risk for
total and respiratory mortality.
Panel a (left) provides central estimates; panel b (right) also adds the 95% intervals. The points reflect
central estimates and the lines the 95% intervals. Solid lines represent statistically
significant effect estimates; dashed lines represent non-statistically significant
estimates.1
Several review articles in recent years have examined whether exposure to PM affects
risk of infant mortality, generally concluding that more consistent evidence has been
observed for postneonatal mortality particularly from respiratory causes (Bobak and Leon,
1999, 007678; Heinrich and Slama, 2007, 156534; Lacasana et al., 2005, 155914; Sram et
al., 2005, 087442). In one review authors identified 14 studies on infant mortality and air
pollution and determined that studies on PM and infant mortality do not provide consistent
results, although more evidence was present for an association for some subsets of infant
mortality such as postneonatal respiratory-related mortality (Bobak and Leon, 1999,
007678). The relationship between PM and postneonatal respiratory mortality was
concluded to be causal in one review (Sram et al., 2005, 087442). and strong and consistent
in another (Heinrich and Slama, 2007, 156534). Meta-analysis using inverse-variance
weighting of PMio studies found that a 10 |ug/m3 increase in acute PMio exposure was
associated with 3.3% (95% CP 2.4-4.3) increase in risk of postneonatal mortality, whereas
the same increment of chronic PMio exposure was linked with a 4.8% (95% CP 2.2-7.2)
1 Studies included are Bobak and Leon (1999, 007678). Ha et al. (2003, 042552). Ritz et al. (2006, 089819). Romieu et al. (2004,
093074). Romieu et al. (2008, 156922). Woodruff et al. (1997, 084271). Woodruff et al. (2006, 088758). Findings from Bobak
and Leon (1999, 007678) were based on TSP and were converted to PMio estimates assuming PMio/TSP = 0.8 as per
summary data in the original article (Bobak and Leon, 1999, 007678). Findings from Woodruff et al. (1997, 084271) for
respiratory-related mortality were based on non-low birth weight infants. Results for Woodruff et al. (2006, 088758) were
based on PM2.5 and were converted to PMio assuming PM2.5/PM10 = 0.6.
July 2009
7-83
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
increase in postneonatal mortality and a 21.6% (95% CP 10.2-34.2) increase for respiratory
postneonatal mortality (Lacasana et al., 2005, 155914).
Studies that examined multiple outcomes and ages of death allow a direct comparison
based on the same study population and methodologies, thereby negating the concern that
inconsistent results are due to underlying variation in population, approaches, etc. In this
review, one study finds higher effect estimates for postneonatal mortality, for both total and
respiratory-related mortality, and the other study found higher effects for risk in the
neonatal period. Another study, based in Southern California identified no association for
neonatal effects (numerical results not provided) but statistically significant results for
postneonatal mortaliy (Ritz et al., 2006, 089819). Figure 7.6 compares risk for the
postneonatal period for respiratory and total mortality. In six of the seven studies, higher
effect estimates were observed for respiratory-related mortality. Results from the neonatal
period found higher effects for total mortality compared to respiratory mortality (Bobak and
Leon, 1999, 007678) and the reverse for a study examining infant mortality (Lipfert et al.,
2000, 004103). Thus, there exists evidence for a stronger effect at the postneonatal period
and for respiratory-related mortality, although this trend is not consistent across all
studies.
Decrements in Sperm Quality
Limited research conducted in the Czech Republic on the effect of ambient air
pollution on sperm production has found associations between elevated air pollution and
decrements in proportionately fewer motile sperm, proportionately fewer sperm with
normal morphology or normal head shape, proportionately more sperm with abnormal
chromatin (Selevan et al., 2000, 012578), and an increase in the percentage of sperm with
DNA fragmentation (Rubes et al., 2005, 078091). These results were not specific to PM, but
for exposure to a high-, medium- or low-polluted air mixture. Similarly, in Salt Lake City,
Utah, fine particulate matter (PM2.5) was associated with decreased sperm motility and
morphology (Hammoud et al. 2009). Research in Los Angeles, California examined 5134
semen samples from 48 donors in relation to ambient air pollution measured 0"9, 10-14, 70-
90 days before semen collection over a 2-yr period (1996-1998). Ambient ozone during all
exposure periods had a significant negative correlation with average sperm concentration,
and no other pollutant measures were significantly associated with sperm quality
parameters, or presented quantitatively (Sokol et al., 2006, 098539).
7.4.2. Toxicological Studies
This section summarizes recent evidence on reproductive health effects reported with
exposure to ambient I'M! no evidence was presented in this area in the 2004 PM AQCD.
Studies from different toxicological rodent models allow for investigation of specific
mechanisms and modes of action for reproductive changes. Emphasis is placed here on
July 2009
7-84
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
results from different windows of development, i.e., if exposure in utero, neonatally or as an
adult can affect reproductive outcomes as an adult. In addition, studies evaluating whether
fertility is affected in female and/or male animals equally by a similar exposure, and how
exposures are transmitted to the fertility of the F1 offspring, are summarized. Hormonal
changes which can lead to decreased sperm count or changes in the estrous cycle are also of
interest. Pregnancy losses and placental sufficiency are also followed. Most recently, the
role of environmental chemicals in shifting sex ratios (also seen in epidemiologic studies)
and in affecting heritable DNA changes have become endpoints of interest.
7.4.2.1. Female Reproductive Effects
Significant work has been done in male rodent models to determine the effect of PM
exposure on reproductive success! fewer studies have been done on female rodents. Tsukue
et al. (2004, 096643) exposed pregnant C57-BL mice to DE 0.1 mg DEP/m3 diluted in
charcoal and HEPA-filtered clean air or to for 8 h/day GD 2-13 and at GD 14 collected the
female fetuses for analysis of mRNAfor Ad4BP-l/SF-l and MIS, and found no significant
changes. The concentration of the gaseous materials including NO, NOx, NO2, CO and SO2
are 2.2 + 0.34 ppm, 2.5 + 0.34 ppm, 0.0 ppm, 9.8 ± 0.69 ppm, and <0.1ppm (not detectable),
respectively. Work by Yoshida et al. (2006, 097015) showed changes in these two transcripts
in male ICR fetuses exposed to similar doses of DEP, albeit with different daily durations of
exposure. Further work by Yoshida et al. showed that of three mouse strains tested, ICR
male fetuses were the most sensitive to DE-dependent changes in these two genes.
Nonetheless, strain sensitivity to DEP may also differ by sex. Thus, it appears that female
mice exposed in utero to DE show a lack of response at the mRNA level of MIS or Ad4bP-
1/SF-l, important genes in male sexual differentiation that showed DE-dependent changes
in male pups from dams exposed in utero. Female fetuses do however show a decrease in
BMP-15, which is related to oocyte development. Possible ingestion exposure by the
animals during grooming cannot be ruled out in this study.
Windows of exposure are important in determining reproductive success as an adult.
Exposure as a neonate may have a drastically more profound impact than does a similar
adult exposure in females. To test this, female BALB/C mice were exposed to ambient air in
Sao Paulo as neonates or as adults and then were bred to non-exposed males (Mohallem et
al., 2005, 088657). Concentrations of pollutants in this ambient air including CO, NO2,
PM10, and SO2 as measured locally were 2.2 ± 1.0, 107.8 ± 42.3, 35.5 ± 12.8, and 11.2 ± 5.3,
respectively. They reported decreased fertility in animals exposed as newborn but not in
adult-exposed female BALB/c mice. There were a significantly higher number of liveborn
pups from dams housed in filtered chambers (PM removed as well as chemical substances)
versus animals exposed to ambient air as newborns. There was also a higher incidence of
implantation failures in dams reared as newborns in polluted chambers. Sex ratio (unlike
in epidemiologic studies), number of pregnancies per group, resorptions, fetal deaths, and
July 2009
7-85
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
fetal placental weights did not differ significantly by treatment group. Thus, in these
studies, exposure to ambient air pollution and its associated PM affected future
reproductive success of females if they were exposed as neonates and not if they are
exposed as adults.
Environmental chemicals have been shown to act as endocrine disruptors by acting on
the androgen pathway, including the phthalates, which have manifested their anti-
androgenic activity in numerous ways including decreased anogenital distance in male
rodents (Foster et al., 1980, 094701; Foster et al., 2001, 156442). To access the role of DE
exposure on reproductive success and anti-androgenic effects on offspring, Tsukue et al.
(2002, 030593) exposed 6-weeks-old female C57-BL mice to 4 months of DE (0.3, 1.0, or 3.0
mg/m3) or filtered air (controls). Some animals were euthanized at the end of this exposure!
DE-exposed estrous females from this group were found to have significantly decreased
uterine weight (1.0 mg/m3). Some of these DE-exposed females were bred to unexposed
males. It was determined that DE-exposure led to increased but not significant rates of
pregnancy loss in mated females (up to 25%). The rate of good nest construction of the
pregnant exposed dams at the highest dose group was significantly lower than control (3.0
mg DEP/m3). Offspring were weighed after birth with significant decreases in body weight
seen at 6 and 8 wk (males and females 1.0 and 3.0 mg DEP/m3) and in female offspring
(9 wk of age, 1.0 and 3.0 mg/m3). Anogenital distance, a sensitive marker of anti-androgen
activity in males, was significantly decreased in 30-day old DEP exposed male offspring (0.3
mg DEP/m3) v. controls. Thymus weight was significantly decreased in 30-day old female
offspring (3.0 mg DEP/m3) and remained decreased at 70 days (0.3 and 1.0 mg DEP/m3).
Ovary weight of female offspring was significantly decreased (3.0 mg DEP/m3) at 30 days,
but no longer significantly different at 70 days. In males at 70 days of age, body weights
were significantly decreased and AGD was significantly shorter (3.0 mg DEP/m3). In
females at 70 days of age, the 1.0 mg DEP/m3 group showed significantly lower organ
weights (adrenals, liver, and thymus) and the 3.0 mg DEP/m3 group had decreased body
weight. Thymus weight of the 0.3 mg/m3 females was significantly lower at 70 days. Also,
crown to rump length in females from dams exposed to DEP (1.0 and 3.0 mg DEP/m3) was
also significantly lower. In conclusion, adult exposure to DEP led to maternal-dependent
reproductive changes that affected outcomes in offspring manifesting as decreased pup body
weight, anti-androgenic effects like decreased AGD and decreased organ weight (which may
be confounded by changes in body weight).
7.4.2.2. Male Reproductive Effects
Rodent strains differ in their sensitivity and response to various environmental
chemicals. Studies were performed to determine PM-dependent strain sensitivity using
male steroidogenic enzymes as the model pathway. In utero exposure of 3 strains of
pregnant mice (ICR, C57B1/6J or ddY mice) via inhalation exposure of DE at 0.1 mg DE
July 2009
7-86
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
particles (DEP)/m3 in HEPA-filtered clean air occurred or clean air as controls continuously
over gestational days 2-13 (Yoshida et al., 2006, 156170). At gestational day 14, dams were
euthanized and fetuses were collected from the uteri. Male fetuses were collected from each
dam for mRNA analysis of genes related to male gonad development including mullerian
inhibiting substance (MIS), steroid transgenic factor (Ad4BP/SF-l), an enzyme in the
testosterone synthesis pathway, cytochrome P450 cholesterol side chain cleavage enzyme
(P450scc), and other steroidogenic enzymes [l76-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (HSD),
cytochrome P450 17-(rhydroxylase (P450cl7), and 3-6hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase
(3BHSD)]. There were significant decreases in MIS (ICR, and C57BL/6 mice) and
Ad4BP/SF-l (ICR mice) versus control at gestational day (GD) 14. SF-1 transcriptionally
regulates T secretion. MIS is crucial in for sexual differentiation including mullerian duct
regression in males. The ddY strain showed no significant changes in Ad4BP/SF-l or MIS
which the authors hypothesized may be due to changes in 3frh I ), which had marked
changes in expression in the ddY strain when compared to non-DE exposed controls. From
these studies, it appears that mouse strains with in utero exposure to DE show differential
sensitivity in gonadal differentiation genes (mRNA) expression in male offspring! ICR are
the most sensitive, followed by C57BL/6 with ddY mice the least sensitive.
Yoshida et al. (2006, 097015) also monitored changes in the male reproductive tract
after in utero exposure to DE. Timed-pregnant ICR dams were exposed during gestation
(2dpc to 16dpc) to continuous DE generated to concentrations of 0.3, 1.0 or 3.0 mg DEP/m3
in HEPA-filtered air or clean air as controls. PM deposition on the fur and ingestion of the
dams by grooming is another possible exposure route in this study. The reproductive tracts
of male offspring were monitored at 4 wk postnatally. These pups received possible
continued exposure through lactation as dams exposed to DE during gestation nursed pups.
There was a threshold effect! 0.3 mg/m3 had no effect on male reproductive organ weight or
serum testosterone (T). Exposure to the higher doses (1.0 and 3.0 mg/m3) of DEP led to
significant increases in reproductive gland weight [testis, prostate, seminal vesicle (3.0 mg
DEP/m3 only) and coagulating gland]. The intermediate dose of 1.0 mg DEP/m3 induced
significant increases in serum T. The organ weights are presented as absolute numbers and
not adjusted for body weight, which is sometimes problematic for complete representation
of hormonal changes as body weight may confound absolute organ weight changes.
Nonetheless, there were also significant decreases in mRNA for the steroidogenesis related
enzymes 36HSD (3.0 mg DEP/m3) and aromatase (3.0 mg DEP/m3). Transcripts relating to
male sexual differentiation [Mullerian inhibitory substance (mis) and steroid transgenic
factor (AD4BP/SF-1), 1.0 and 3.0 mg DEP/m3] were also significantly decreased. Sexual
differentiation is a tightly regulated process. For example, SF-1 missense mutations result
in XY individuals with external female genitalia. Thus the effect of environmental DE-
exposure should not be underscored.
July 2009
7-87
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
This study demonstrated effects of DE exposure on male spermatogenesis. Exposure
of pregnant ICR mice to DE (2 dpc-16 dpc continuous inhalation exposure to 1.0 mg DEP/m3
in filtered air or to filtered clean air) led to impaired spermatogenesis in offspring (Ono et
al., 2007, 156007). Male offspring were followed at PND 8, 16, 21 (3 wk), 35 (5 wk) and 84
(12 wk). After 16dpc but before termination of the study, all of the animals were transferred
to a regular animal care facility. No cross fostering was performed in this experiment, so
pups that were born to DE-exposed dams were also nursed on these dams and may have
received lactational exposure to DE from milk. The gaseous components of the diluted DE
included nitric oxide (NO), NO2, sulfur dioxide (SO2), and CO2 at concentrations of 11.75 ±
1.18, 4.62 ± 0.36, 0.21 ± 0.01, and 4922 ± 244 ppm, respectively. The average proportion of
sulfur in the fuel during this study was 0.043%. Body weight was significantly depressed at
PNDs 8 and 35. Accessory gland relative weight was significantly increased at PND 8 and
16 only. Serum testosterone was significantly decreased at 3 wk and at 12 wk was
significantly increased. At 5 and 12 wk, daily sperm production (DSP) was significantly
decreased. FSH receptor and star mRNA levels were significantly increased at 5 and 12 wk,
respectively. Relative testis weight and relative epididymal weight were unchanged at all
time points. All endpoints were measured at each time point and if not mentioned above,
those data reported no significant changes. Histological changes showed Sertoli cells with
partial vacuolization and a significant increase in testicular multinucleated giant cells in
the seminiferous tubules of DE exposed animals compared to control. This study indicates
that in utero exposure to DE had effects on spermatogenesis in offspring at the
histologically, hormonally and functionally.
In utero exposure to DE and its effect on adult body weight, sex ratio, and male
reproductive gland weight was measured by Yoshida et al. (2006, 097015). Pregnant ICR
mice were exposed by inhalation to DE (0.3, 1.0 or 3.0 mg DEP/m3 or to clean air) from 2dpc
to 16dpc. Pups were allowed to nurse in clean air on exposed dams until weaning and at
PND 28, male pups were sacrificed. At this time, serum testosterone and pup reproductive
gland weight was determined. Significant increases in relative reproductive organ weights
were reported at 1.0 and 3.0 mg DEP/m3 for the seminal vesicle, testis, epididymis,
coagulating gland, prostate and liver. Male pup serum testosterone was significantly
increased at 1.0 mg DEP/m3. Mean testosterone positively correlated with testis weight,
daily sperm production, aromatase and steroidogenic enzyme message level (P450cc, cl7
lyase, and P450 aromatase). Sex ratio did not differ in DE-exposed animals versus control.
Male pup body weight of DE-exposed animals was significantly increased at PND 28 (1.0
and 3.0 mg DEP/m3). These studies show that in utero DE-exposure led to increased serum
testosterone and increased reproductive gland weight in male offspring early in life.
The effects of DE on murine adult male reproductive function were studied by
exposing ICR male mice (6 wk of age) to DE (clean air control, 0.3, 1.0 or 3.0 mg DECP/m3)
for 12 h/day for 6 months with another group receiving a one month recovery of clean air
July 2009
7-88
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
exposure post-exposure (Yoshida and Takedab, 2004, 097760). After six months exposure,
there was a dose-dependent significant increase in degeneration of seminiferous tubules of
mice exposed to DEP. After six months, there was a significant decrease in daily sperm
production (DSP)/g of testis tissue in DEP exposed animals. After six months exposure to
DEP plus one month recovery with clean air exposure, significant decreases remained in
DSP at the higher doses! the effect was lost at 0.3 mg/m3. This adult exposure and other
work with in utero exposure to DE showed similar outcomes. The effect of ingestion of
deposited PM from the fur during grooming post-inhalation exposure cannot be ruled out as
a possible mechanism of exposure in this experiment.
Earlier studies showed an inverse correlation between environmental levels of PM
and sperm count in adult men (Mehta and Anad Kumar, 1997, 157197). To expand on PM-
dependent changes in spermatogenesis, an eloquent DE-exposure model was designed to
determine if PM or the gaseous phase of DE was responsible for changes in sperm
production in rodents (Watanabe, 2005, 087985). Pregnant dams (F344/DuCrj rats) exposed
to DE (6 hs/day exposure to 0.17 or 1.71 mg DEP/m3) or filtered air (removing PM only, high
dose filtered air and low dose filtered air) from GD7 to parturition produced adult offspring
with a decreased number of Sertoli cells and decreased daily sperm production (PND 96)
when compared to control mice exposed to clean air (Watanabe, 2005, 087985). The
concentrations of NO2 for the high filtered and low filtered exposure groups were 0.8 and
0.1 ppm, respectively. Because both filtered and DE-exposure groups showed the same
outcomes, the effects are likely due to gaseous components of DE.
Another source of PM emissions that is common around the world is motorcycle
exhaust. Adult male (8 weeks old) Wistar rats were exposed to motorcycle exhaust (ME) for
one hour in the morning and one hour in the afternoon Monday through Friday at L50
dilution in filtered clean air for 4 wk (group A) or 1:10 for 2 (group B) or 4 wk (group C) or to
clean air (Huang et al., 2008, 156574) via a head and nose inhalation chamber. After 4 wk of
exposure, both exposed groups had significantly decreased body weight v. control. All three
groups showed a decreased number of spermatids in the testis after ME exposure. Both
1:10 exposure groups also showed a decrease in caudal epididymal sperm counts. Group C
showed significant decreases in testicular weight. Group C had decreased mRNAfor the
cytochrome P450 substrate 7-ehtoxycoumarin Ode-ethylase, and increased IL-6, IL-1B,
and cox-2 mRNA control. Decreased protein levels of antioxidant superoxide dismutase and
increased IL-6 protein were reported for group C when compared to control. Serum
testosterone was significantly decreased in group C and co-treatment of group C with the
antioxidant vitamin E resulted in partial rescue of serum T levels and caudal epididymal
sperm counts (albeit still significantly decreased versus control), and returned IL-6, IL-16,
and COX-2 ME-exposure-dependent message levels to baseline. The glutathione
antioxidant system and lipid peroxidation were unchanged after these ME exposures at the
time points measured. Male animals exposed to ME in this experiment showed significant
July 2009
7-89
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
decrements in body weight, spermatid number, and serum testosterone with an increase in
inflammatory cytokines. Vitamin E co-treatment with ME-exposure led to an attenuation of
inflammation and a partial rescue of testosterone levels and sperm numbers. No filtration
was done in this experiment to determine if the effects were gas- or particle-dependent.
In summary, laboratory animals exposed to DE in utero or as adults manifest with
abnormal effects on the male reproductive system. In utero exposure to DE induced
increased reproductive gland weight and increased serum testosterone in early life
(PND28), which may lead to early puberty (albeit not measured in this study). With similar
in utero DE exposures, later life outcomes include decreased DSP, abberant sperm
morphology, and hormonal changes (T and FSHr decrements). Chronic exposure of adult
mice to DE also induced decreased DSP and seminiferous tubule degeneration. DE-
dependent effects on male reproductive function have been reported in multiple animal
models with only one model separating exposure based on particulate versus gaseous
components. DE and filtered air (gaseous phase only) exposure in utero induced Sertoli cell
and DSP decrements in both groups, indicating that the gaseous phase of DE was
causative. Adult male rats exposed to ME manifested with decreased spermatid number,
serum T, and an increase in inflammatory cytokines. Significant effects on the male
reproductive system have been demonstrated after exposure to ambient PM sources (DE,
ME, or PAHs). Nonetheless, these models often include a complex mixture of gaseous
component and PM exposure, which makes interpreting the contribution from PM alone
difficult.
7.4.2.3. Multiple Generation Effects
Multi-generational, chronic exposure to traffic-generated fine PM affects reproductive
and fetal outcomes in female mice including estrous cyclicity, follicle development, mating,
fertility, and pregnancy success. In this study, Veras et al. (2009, 190496) investigated
pregnancy and female reproductive outcomes in BalbC female mice exposed to ambient air
(NF) or filtered air (F) at one of two different time periods (before conception and during
pregnancy) at the University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine near an area of high traffic
density. The exposure system is described by Mohallem et al., earlier in this ISA. Two
groups of 2nd generation (G2) nulliparous female mice were continuously exposed to
filtered air (F) or non-filtered ambient air (NF) since birth. Estrous cyclicity and ovarian
follicle classification were followed at PND60 (reproductive maturation) in one group. A
further group was subdivided into 4 groups by exposures during pregnancy following
reproductive capability and pregnancy outcomes of the G2 mice. Exposure were 27.5 and
6.5 ug/m3PM2.5, respectively for NF and F chambers with 101 ug/m3 NO2, 1.81 ug/m3 CO,
and 7.66 ppm SO2 in both chambers (Veras et al., 2009, 190496).
The results of this study showed that animals exposed to NF air versus F air had an
extended time in estrous and thus a reduction in the number of cycles during the
July 2009
7-90
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
experiment study period. The number of antral follicles was significantly decreased in the
NF versus the F animals. Other follicular quantification (number of small, growing or
preovulatory follicles) showed no significant differences between the two chambers. There
was a significant increase in the time necessary for mating, a significant decrease in the
fertility index, and a significant increase in the pregnancy index in the NF group versus the
F group. Specifically, in the NF1 and NF2 groups, there was a significant increase in rate of
the post-implantation loss. However, there was no statistically significant change in
number of pups in the litter. Fetal weight was significantly decreased in all treatment
groups (F2, NF1, and NF2) when compared to F1 or animals raised entirely in filtered air,
showing that fetal weight was affected by both pre-gestational and gestational PM exposure
(Veras et al., 2009, 190496).
PM exposure prior to conception is associated with increased time in estrous, which in
other animal models can be related to ovarian hormone dysfunction and ovulatory
problems. These estrous issues can contribute to fecundity issues. There was no significant
difference in number of preovulatory follicles in this model, but there was a statistically
significant decrease in the number of antral follicles. Antral follicles are the last stage in
follicle development prior to ovulation, and a decrease in antral follicle number can be
related to premature reproductive senescence, premature ovarian failure, or early
menopause, which was not followed in this model (Veras et al., 2009, 190496).
From the experimental design, one sees that the males that were used to generate the
G1 and G2 generations were also exposed to NF or F air, and thus the reproductive
contribution of these males to the overall fertility and mating changes in the females
mentioned above cannot be totally eliminated as a possible confounder as the literature has
characterized PM exposure as being associated with adverse male reproductive outcomes.
Thus these effects are hard to differentiate as male or female-dependent and can thus
indicate a general loss of reproductive fitness. Interestingly, both pre and gestational
exposure to NF induced a significant loss in post-implantation of fetuses and this may be
related to placental insufficiency as has been described in other work by this lab (Veras et
al., 2008, 190493).
7.4.2.4. Receptor Mediated Effects
Arylhydrocarbon Receptor (AhR) and DEP
The AhR is often activated by chemicals classified as endocrine disrupting compounds
(EDCs), exogenous chemicals that behave as hormonally active agents, disrupting the
physiological function of endogenous hormones. DEPs are known to activate the AhR. A
recent study by Izawa et al. (2007, 190387) showed that certain polyphenols (quercetin from
the onion) and food extracts (Ginkgo biloba extract (GBE)) are able to attenuate DEP-
July 2009
7-91
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
dependent AhR activation when measured with the Ah-Immunoassay, thus possibly
attenuating the EDC activity of DEP.
7.4.2.5. Developmental Effects
Sex Ratio
A direct correlation between air pollution (PMio) exposure and a decrease in
standardized sex ratios (SSRs) has been reported in humans exposed to air pollution
(Lichtenfels et al., 2007, 097041; Wilson et al., 2000, 010288) pollution, with fewer numbers
of male births reported. To understand this shift, two groups (control and exposed) of male
Swiss mice were housed concurrently in Sao Paulo and received either ambient air
exposure or filtered air (chemical and particulate filtering) from PND10 for four months.
Filtration efficiency for PM2.5, carbon black, and NO2 inside the chamber was found to be
55%, 100%, and 35%, respectively. After this exposure, non-exposed females were placed in
either chamber to mate. After mating, the males were sacrificed and testes collected; males
exposed to ambient air showed decreased testicular and epididymal sperm counts,
decreased total number of germ cells, and decreased elongated spermatids, but no
significant change in litter size. Females were housed in the chambers and sacrificed on
GD19 when the number of pups born alive and the sex ratio were obtained. There was a
significant decrease in the SSR for pups born after living in the ambient air-exposed
chamber compared to the filtered chamber. In this study, a shift in SSR has been shown for
both humans and rodents exposed to air pollution, but other studies with DE exposure
(Yoshida et al., 2006, 156170) or ambient air in Sao Paulo (Mohallem et al., 2005, 088657)
showed no changes in rodent sex ratio. Possible exposure to PM and other components of
ambient air via ingestion during grooming cannot be ruled out in this rodent model.
Immunological Effect-Placenta
Placental insufficiency can lead to the loss of a pregnancy or to adverse fetal
outcomes. DE-exposure has been shown to induce inflammation in various models.
Fujimoto et al. (2005, 096556) assessed cytokine/immunological changes of DE-dependent
inhalation exposure on the placenta during pregnancy. Pregnant Sl<> CR mice were exposed
to DE (0.3, 1.0, or 3.0 mg DEP/m3 in HEPA and charcoal-filtered clean air from 2dpc to 13
dpc) or clean air in inhalation chambers! dams, placenta, and pups were collected at 14dpc.
There was a significant increase in the number of absorbed placentas in DE exposed
animals (0.3 and 3.0 mg DEP/m3) with a significant decrease in the number of absorbed
placentas in DE exposed animals at the middle dose (1.0 mg DEP/m3). Absorbed placentas
from DE exposed mice had undetectable levels of CYP1A1 and two fold increases in TNF-a!
CYP1A1 placental mRNAfrom healthy placentas of DE-exposed mice was unchanged
versus control. Interleukin (!L)-2, IL-5, IL-12a, IL-12-6 and granulocyte macrophage colony-
July 2009
7-92
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
stimulating factor (GM-CSF) mRNA significantly increased in placentas of DE-exposed
animals (0.3 and 3 mg DEP/m3). Placental IL-6 mRNA was increased ten-fold in DE-
exposed mice (3.0 mg DEP/m3). Fujimoto et al. reported DE-induced significant increases in
multiple inflammatory markers in the placenta with significant increases in the number of
absorbed placentas.
Immunological Effects: Asthma
In utero exposure may confer susceptibility to PM-induced asthmatic responses in
offspring. Exposure of pregnant BALB/c mice to aerosolized ROFAleachate by inhalation or
to DEP intranasally increases asthma susceptibility to their offspring (Fedulov et al., 2008,
097482; Hamada et al., 2007, 091235). The offspring from dams exposed for 30 min to 50
mg/mL ROFA 1, 3, or 5 days prior to delivery responded to OVA immunization and aerosol
challenge with airway hyperreactivity and increased antigen-specific IgE and IgGl
antibodies. Airway hyperreactivity was also observed in the offspring of dams intra-nasally
instilled with 50 |ug of DEP or Ti02, or 250 |ug CB, indicating that the same effect could be
demonstrated using relatively "inert" particles. Pregnant mice were particularly sensitive
to exposure to DEP or TiCh particles, and genetic analysis indicated differential expression
of 80 genes in response to Ti02 in pregnant dams. Thus pregnancy and in utero exposure
may enhance responses to PM, and exposure to even relatively inert particles may result in
offspring predisposed to asthma.
Placental Morphology and Urban PM Exposure
Exposure to ambient air pollution during pregnancy is associated with reduced fetal
weight in both human and animal models. The effect of particular urban air pollution on
the functional morphology of the mouse placenta was explored by exposing second
generation mice in one of four groups to urban Sao Paulo air (PM was 67% PM2.5, mainly of
vehicular origin) or filtered air (Veras et al., 2008, 190493). Experimental design follows
with group F-F being comprised of mice that were raised in filtered air chambers and
completed pregnancy in filtered air chambers! group F-nF was raised in filtered air and
pregnant in ambient air! group nF-nF was raised and completed pregnancy in non-filtered
air chambers! group nF-F mice were raised in ambient air and received filtered air during
pregnancy. Exposure was from PND20-PND60. At this time, the animals were mated and
then maintained in their respective chambers during pregnancy! pregnancy was terminated
at GD18 (near term) with placentas and fetuses collected then for analysis.
Exposure to ambient PM pregestationally or gestationally led to significantly smaller
fetal weight (total litter weight). Progestational exposure to ambient air induced significant
increases in fetal capillary surface area and in total mass-specific conductance. But
maternal/dam blood space and diameters were reduced. Gestational exposure to non-
filtered air was associated with reduced volume, diameter (caliber) and surface area of
July 2009
7-93
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
maternal blood space with compensatory greater fetal capillary surface and oxygen
diffusion conduction rates. Intravascular barrier thickness, a quantitative relationship
between trophoblast volume and the combined surfaces of maternal blood spaces and fetal
capillaries, was not reduced with ambient air exposure. Fetal/placental circulatory
adaptation to maternal blood deficits after ambient PM exposure seems to be insufficient to
overcome PM-dependent birth weight deficits in mice exposed to ambient air with the
magnitude of this effect greater in the gestationally exposed groups.
Placental Weights and Birth Outcomes
Pregnant female Swiss mice were exposed to ambient air (Sao Paulo) or filtered air
over various portions of gestation to determine if there was an association between fetal or
placental weight or birth outcomes with exposure to air pollution. The concentration of
various components of the ambient air as measured by a State Environmental Sanitation
Agency 100 m away from the rodent exposure chambers reported PMio (42 ± 17 pm/m3),
NO2 (97 ± 39 pg/m3), and SO2 (9 ± 4 pg/m3) concentrations. By using six windows of
exposure that covered one to three weeks of gestation, which is all of gestation in a mouse,
these authors (Silva et al., 2008, 156981) determined that a significant decrease in near-
term fetal weight(GD19) could be induced by ambient air-exposure at least during the first
week of gestation. Decreased placental weight could be induced by ambient air exposure
during any of the three weeks of gestation. These studies point to possible windows of
exposure that may be important in evaluating epidemiologic study results.
Neurodevelopmental Effects
The diagnosis of autism is on the rise in the Western world with its etiology mostly
unknown. Autism is associated cell loss in specific brain regions that is hypothesized to be
developmental in origin. Sugamata et al. (2006, 097166) exposed pregnant ICR mice to DE
(0.3 mg DEP/m3) continuously from 2 days post-coitus (dPC) to 16 dPC. Pups with in utero
exposure to DE were nursed in clean air chambers but may have received gastro-intestinal
exposure via lactational transfer of various components of DE. At 11 wk of age, cerebullar
brain tissue was collected. Twenty animals were in each group (10 females, 10 males) with
one group receiving clean air exposure and one receiving DE; no filtration was used to
compare PM v. gaseous DE exposure. Earlier work has shown that DEP (<0.1 pm) have
been detected in the brains (cerebral cortex and hippocampus) of newborn pups who were
born to dams who were exposed to DE during pregnancy (Sugamata et al., 2006, 097166).
Histological analysis of DE-exposed pup cerebella revealed significant increases in caspase-
3 (c-3) positive cells compared to control and significant decreases in cerebella Purkinje cell
numbers in DE-exposed animals versus control. The ratio of cells positive for apoptosis (c*3
positive) showed a nearly significant sex difference with males displaying increased
apoptosis versus females (p = 0.09). In humans with autism, the cerebellum has a decreased
July 2009
7-94
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
number of Purkinje cells, which is thought to be fetal and developmental in origin! further,
these authors speculate that humans maybe more sensitive to DE-dependent neuronal
brain changes as the human placenta is 2 layers thick whereas the mouse placenta is 4
layers thick.
Behavioral Effects
Body weight decrements at birth have recently been associated through the Barker
hypothesis with adverse adult outcomes. Thus, many publications have begun to focus on
decreased birth weight for gestational age and associated adult changes. Hougaard et al.
(2008, 156570) exposed 40 timed-pregnant C57BL/6 dams to DEP reference materials (aged
DE particulate extract) via inhalation chamber over GD7-GD19 of pregnancy. They found
significantly decreased pup weight at weaning, albeit not at birth. PM-dependent liver
changes were monitored by following various inflammatory and gentoxicityrelated mRNA
transcripts! there were no significant differences in pups at PND2. The comet assay from
PND2 pup livers showed no significant differences between DEP-exposed and control
animals. Thyroxine was unchanged in control and DEP-exposed dams and offspring at
weaning. At two months, female DEP-exposed pups required less time than controls to
locate the platform in its new location during the first trial of the spatial reversal learning
task in the Morris water maze (p < 0.05). DEP extract exposure during in utero
development led to decreased body weight at weaning and no changes in inflammatory
markers, or thyroid hormone levels.
The effect of in utero DE exposure on CNS motor function was evaluated in male pups
(ICR mice); dams received DE exposure 8hxd/5d/wk via total body inhalation GD2-GD17
(Yokota et al., 2009, 190518). Spontaneous motor activity was significantly decreased in
pups (PND35) as was the dopamine metabolite homovanillic acid (HVA) as measured in the
striatum and nucleus accumbens indicating decreased dopamine (DA) turnover. DA levels
were unchanged in the same areas of the brain. The authors conclude that these data
demonstrate that maternal exposure to DE induced hypolocomotion, similar to earlier
studies with adult and neonatal DEP exposure (Peters et al., 2000, 001756), with decreased
extracellular DA release. Concentrations of DE constituents in the Yokota study for DE
particle mass, CO, NO2, and SO2 are 1.0 mg/m3, 2.67 ppm, 0.23 ppm, and <0.01ppm,
respectively.
Lactation
Lactational exposure to various environmental compounds is an area of research that
is often overlooked. Breast milk is a complex matrix, which is essential for the survival of
many species. Compounds that are especially lipophilic are commonly found in breast milk
of exposed dams and this maternal load can be transferred to the developing neonate. PM
in DE adsorbs many chemicals, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which
July 2009
7-95
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
have been shown to have to be mutagenic and to be estrogenic/antiestrogenic and
antiandrogenic (Hirose et al., 2001, 156548; Kizu et al., 2003, 096196). Thus, Tozuka et al.
(2004, 090864) monitored the transfer of aromatic hydrocarbons to fetuses and breast milk
of Fisher 344 rats exposed to DE for 2 wk from GD7-GD 20 (minus four days of the weekend
with no exposures) for 6h/day with PMio concentration of 1.73 mg/m3. Concentrations of
individual PAHs were monitored in the inhalation chambers including Ace, Fie, Phe, Ant,
Flu, Pyr, BaA, Chr, BbF, BkF, BaP, DBA, BghiP, and IDP at 150 ± 34, 3160 ± 401,
2280 ± 291, 70.3 ± 10.9, 148 ± 19, 133 ± 5, 17.2 ± 2.7, 39.9 ± 6.8, 9.9 ± 2.1, 4.9 ± 1.1, 3.7 ± 0.5,
<1.4, <6.0, and 4.2 ±0.1 ng/m3, respectively. At PND 14, milk was collected from exposed
and control rats. Fifteen PAHs were monitored in DE-generated air. Seven of these were
quantified in dam blood with levels of phenanthrene (Phe), anthracene (Ant) and
benz[a]anthracene (BaA) in the DE group being significantly higher than control group. In
breast milk, acenaphthene (Ace), fluorene (Fie), Phe, Ant, fluoranthene (Flu), pyrene (Pyr),
BaA and chrysene (Chr) were quantified. Ant, Flu, Pyr and Chr showed significant
increases in the DE group compared to control milk. BaA tended to be about four fold
higher than the control group in breast milk, but the increase was not significant. PAHs in
dam livers of DE versus control were not significantly different. PAHs are transferred
across the placenta from the DE-exposed dam to the fetus. Lactational transfer through the
breast milk is also likely as PAHs are detected in dam breast milk, but this should be
confirmed in future studies that cross foster control and exposed dams and pups. The
lipophilicity of the PAH based on its structure affected its uptake to the dam from the air as
PAHs with 3 or 4 rings were found in maternal blood and PAHs with 5 or 6 rings were not
detected in dam blood.
Heritable DNA Changes and Heritable Epigenetic Changes
To address the role of ambient air exposure on heritable changes, Somers et al. (2004,
078098) exposed mice to ambient air in at a rural Canadian site or at an urban site near a
steel mill. They showed that offspring of mice exposed to ambient air in urban regions
inherited paternal-origin expanded simple tandem repeat (ESTR) mutations 1.9 to 2.1
times more frequently than offspring of mice exposed to HEPA filtered air or those exposed
to rural ambient air. Mouse expanded simple tandem repeat (ESTR) DNA is composed of
short base pair repeats which are unstable in the germline and tend to mutate by insertion
or deletion of repeat units. In vivo and in situ studies have shown that murine ESTR loci
are susceptible to ionizing radiation, and other environmental mutatgen-dependent
germline mutations, and are thus good markers of exposure to environmental
contaminants.
Expanding upon the above work and to determine if PM or the gaseous phase of the
urban air was responsible for heritable mutations, Yauk et al. (2008, 157164) exposed
mature male C57BlxCBAFl hybrid mice to either HEPA-filtered air or to ambient air in
July 2009
7-96
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada for three, ten, or 10 wk plus 6 wk of clean air exposure (16 wk).
Sperm DNA was monitored for expanded simple tandem repeat (ESTR) mutations. In
addition, male-germ line (spermatogonial stem cell) DNA methylation was monitored post-
exposure. This area in Hamilton is near 2 steel mills and a major highway. Air composition
provided by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment showed TSP concentration of
9.38 ± 17 |ug/m3, PAH concentration of 8.3 ± 1.7 ng/m3, and metal at 3.6 ± 0.7 mg/m3.
Mutation frequency at ESTR Ms6"hm locus in sperm DNA from mice exposed 3 or 10 wk
did not show elevated ESTR mutation frequencies, but there was a significant increase in
ESTR mutation frequency at 16 wk in ambient air exposed males versus HEPA-filter
exposed animals, pointing to a PM-dependent mechanism of action. When compared to
HEPA-filter air exposed males, ambient air exposed males manifested with
hypermethylation of germ-line DNA at 10 and 16 wk. These PM-dependent epigenetic
modifications (hypermethylation) were not seen in the halploid stage (3 wk) of
spermatogenesis, but were nonetheless seen in early stages of spermatogenesis (10 wk) and
remained significantly elevated in mature sperm even after removal of the mouse from the
environmental exposure (16 wk). Thus, these studies indicate that the ambient PM phase
and not the gaseous phase is responsible for the increased frequency of heritable DNA
mutations and epigenetic modifications.
7.4.3. Summary and Causal Determinations
7.4.3.1. PM2.5
The 1996 PM AQCD concluded that while few studies had been conducted on the link
between PM and infant mortality, the research "suggested an association," particularly for
post-neonates (U.S. EPA, 1996, 079380). In the 2004 PM AQCD, additional evidence was
available on PM's effect on fetal and early postnatal development and mortality and while
some studies indicated a relationship between PM and pregnancy outcomes, others did not
(U.S. EPA, 2004, 056905). Studies identifying associations found that exposure to PM10
early during pregnancy (first month of pregnancy) or late in the pregnancy (six weeks prior
to birth) were linked with higher risk of preterm birth, including models adjusted for other
pollutants, and that PM2.5 during the first month of pregnancy was associated with IUGR.
However, other work did not identify relationships between PM10 exposure and LBW. The
state of the science at that time, as indicated in the 2004 PM AQCD, was that the research
provided mixed results based on studies from multiple countries.
Building on the evidence characterized in the previous AQCDs, recent epidemiologic
studies conducted in the U.S. and Europe were able to examine the effects of PM2.5, and all
found an increased risk of LBW (Section 7.4.1). Exposure to PM2.5 was usually associated
with greater reductions in birth weight than exposure to PM10. All of the studies that
July 2009
7-97
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
examined the relationship between PM2.5 and preterm birth report positive associations,
and most were statistically significant. The studies evaluating the association between
PM2.5 and growth restriction all found positive associations, with the strongest evidence
coming when exposure was assessed during the first or second trimester (Section 7.4.1). For
infant mortality (<1 year), several studies examined PM2.5 and found positive associations
(Section 7.4.1).
Animal toxicological studies reported effects including decreased uterine weight,
limited evidence of male reproductive effects, and conflicting reports of reproductive
outcomes in male offspring, particularly in studies of DE (Section 7.4.2). Toxicological
studies also reported effects for several development outcomes, including immunological
effects in the placenta and related to asthma and neurodevelopmental and behavioral
effects (Section 7.4.2).
In summary evidence is accumulating from epidemiologic studies for effects on LBW
and infant mortality, especially due to respiratory causes during the post-neonatal period.
The mean PM2.5 concentrations during the study periods ranged from 5.3-27.4 ug/ma.
Exposure to PM2.5 was usually associated with greater reductions in birth weight than
exposure to PM10. Several U.S. studies of PM10 investigating fetal growth reported 11-g
decrements in birth weight associated with PM10 exposure. The consistency of these results
strengthens the interpretation that particle exposure may be causally related to reductions
in birth weight. Similarly, animal evidence supported an association between PM2.5 and
PM10 exposure and adverse reproductive and developmental outcomes, but provided little
mechanistic information or biological plausibility for an association between long-term PM
exposure and adverse birth outcomes, including LBW, or infant mortality. Epidemiologic
studies do not consistently report associations between PM exposure and preterm birth,
growth restriction, birth defects or decreased sperm quality. New evidence from animal
toxicological studies on heritable mutations is of great interest, and warrants further
investigation. Overall, the epidemiologic and toxicological evidence is suggestive of a causal
relationship between long-term exposures to PM2.5 and reproductive and developmental
outcomes.
7.4.3.2. PM10-2.5
Evidence is inadequate to determine if a causal relationship exists between long-term
exposure to PM 10-2.5 or other PM components and developmental and reproductive outcomes
because studies have not been conducted in sufficient quantity or quality to draw any
conclusion. A single study found an association between PM10-2.5 and birthweight (-13 g
[95% CP -18.3 to -7.6] per 10 pg/m3 increase), but no such association for PM2.5 (Parker et
al„ 2008, 156013).
July 2009 7-98 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
7.5. Cancer, Mutagenicity, and Genotoxicity
Evidence from epidemiologic and animal toxicological studies has been accumulating
for more than three decades regarding the mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of PM in the
ambient air. Diesel exhaust (DE) has been identified as one source of PM in ambient air,
and has been extensively studied for its carcinogenic potential. In 1989, the International
Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) found that there was sufficient evidence that
extracts of DEP were carcinogenic in experimental animals and that there was limited
evidence for the carcinogenic effect of DE in humans (IARC, 1989, 002958). This conclusion
was based on studies in which organic extracts of DEP were used to evaluate the effects of
concentrates of the organic compounds associated with carbonaceous soot particles. These
extracts were applied to the skin or administered by IT or intrapulmonary implantation to
mice, rats, or Syrian hamsters and an excess of tumors on the skin, lung or at the site of
injection were observed.
In 2002, the U.S. EPA reviewed over 30 epidemiologic studies that investigated the
potential carcinogenicity of DE. These studies, on average, found that long-term
occupational exposures to DE were associated with a 40% increase in the relative risk of
lung cancer (U.S. EPA, 2002, 042866). In the same report the U.S. EPA concluded that
extensive studies with salmonella had unequivocally demonstrated mutagenic activity in
both particulate and gaseous fractions of DE. They further concluded that DE may present
a lung cancer hazard to humans (U.S. EPA, 2002, 042866). The particulate phase appeared
to have the greatest contribution to the carcinogenic effect. Both the particle core and the
associated organic compounds demonstrated carcinogenic properties, although a role for the
gas-phase components of DE could not be ruled out. Almost the entire diesel particle mass
is < 10 pm in diameter (PMio), with approximately 94% of the mass of these particles
<2.5 pm in diameter (PM2.5), including a subgroup with a large number of ultrafine
particles (U.S. EPA, 2002, 042866). U.S. EPA considered the weight of evidence for potential
human carcinogenicity for DE to be strong, even though inferences were involved in the
overall assessment, and concluded that DE is "likely to be carcinogenic to humans by
inhalation" and that this hazard applies to environmental exposures (U.S. EPA, 2002,
042866).
Two recent reviews of the mutagenicity (Claxton et al., 2004, 089008) and
carcinogenicity (Claxton and Woodall GM, 2007, 180391) of ambient air have characterized
the animal toxicological literature on ambient air pollution and cancer. The majority of
these toxicological studies have been conducted using IT or dermal routes of exposure.
Generally, the toxicological evidence reviewed in this ISA has been limited to inhalation
studies conducted with lower concentrations of PM (<2 mg/m3), relevant to current ambient
concentrations and the current regulatory standard (See Section 1.3). This ISA focuses on
toxicological studies which use the inhalation route of exposure, therefore it is possible that
July 2009
7-99
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
important evidence for the role of PM in mutagenicity, tumorigenicity, and/or
carcinogenicity may be missed. In order to accurately characterize the relationship between
PM and cancer and be consistent with the EPA Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment
(U.S. EPA, 2005, 086237), these reviews (that include studies that employ IT and dermal
routes of exposure) are summarized briefly.
Claxton et al. (2004, 089008) reviewed the mutagenicity of air in the Salmonella
(Ames) assay, and showed that hundreds of compounds identified in ambient air from
varying chemical classes are mutagenic and that the commonly monitored PAHs could not
account for the majority of mutagenicity associated with most airborne particles. They
concluded that the smallest particles have the highest toxicity per particulate mass, with
the PM2.5 size fraction having greater mutagenic and cytotoxic potential than the PM10 size
fraction, which had a higher mutagenic potential than the TSP size fraction. One study
reviewed by Claxton et al. (2004, 089008) found that the cytotoxic potential of PM2.5 was
higher in wintertime samples than in summertime samples. A series of studies on source
apportionment for ambient particle mutagenic activity reviewed by Claxton et al. (2004,
089008) indicate that mobile sources (cars and diesel trucks) account for most of the
mutagenic activity.
Claxton and Woodall (2007, 180391) reviewed many studies that examined the rodent
carcinogenicity of extracts of ambient PM samples! the PM was of various size classes, often
from TSP samples. Among a variety of mouse and rat strains, application methods, and
samples employed, the authors found no pattern that would suggest the routine use of a
particular strain or protocol would be more informative than another. The primary
conclusion that comes from the analysis of rodent carcinogenicity studies is that the most
polluted urban air samples tested to date are carcinogenic! the contribution of PM and
different size classes of PM to the carcinogenic effects of ambient air has not been
delineated. The differences in response by the various strains of inbred mice indicate that
the genetic background of an individual influences how likely a tumorigenic response is to
occur. Studies examining different components of ambient PM (e.g., PAHs) confirm that
ambient air contains multiple carcinogens, and that the carcinogenic potential of particles
from different airsheds can be quite different. Therefore, one would expect the incidence of
cancers related to ambient air exposure in different metropolitan areas to differ.
Numerous epidemiologic and animal toxicological studies of ambient PM and their
contributing sources have been conducted to assess the relative mutagenic or genotoxic
potential. Studies previously reviewed in the 2004 PM AQCD (U.S. EPA, 2004, 056905)
provide evidence that ambient PM as well as PM from specific combustion sources (e.g.,
fossil fuels) is mutagenic in vivo and in vitro. Building on these results, data from recent
epidemiologic and animal toxicological studies that evaluated the carcinogenic, mutagenic
and/or genotoxic effects of PM, PM-constituents, and combustion emission source particles
are reviewed in this section.
July 2009
7-100
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
7.5.1. Epidemiologic Studies
The 2004 PM AQCD reported on original and follow-up analyses for three prospective
cohort studies that examined the relationship between PM and lung cancer incidence and
mortality. Based on these findings, as well as on the results from case-control and ecologic
studies, the 2004 PM AQCD concluded that long-term PM exposure may increase the risk of
lung cancer incidence and mortality. The largest of the three prospective cohort studies
included in the 2004 PM AQCD was the ACS study (Pope CAet al., 2002, 024689). This
study was the follow-up to the original ACS study (Pope CAet al., 1995, 045159), and
included a longer follow-up period and reported a statistically significant association
between PM2.5 exposure and lung cancer mortality.
A 14- to 16-yr prospective study conducted using the Six Cities Study cohort reported
a slightly elevated risk of lung cancer mortality for individuals living in the most polluted
city (mean PMio: 46.5 |ug/m3; mean PM2.5 29.6 ug/m3) as compared to the least polluted city
(mean PMio: 18.2 ug/m3; mean PM2.5 11.0 ug/m3) but the association was not statistically
significant (Dockery et al., 1993, 044457).
Re-analysis of the AHSMOG cohort, a study of non-smoking whites living in
California, concluded that elevated long-term exposure to PM10 was associated with lung
cancer incidence among both men and women (Beeson et al., 1998, 048890). The original
study had reported an excess of incident lung cancers only among women (Abbey et al.,
1991, 042668). Further reanalysis of this cohort revealed an association between PM10 and
lung cancer mortality among men but no association among women (Abbey et al., 1999,
047559). In addition, McDonnell et al. (2000, 010319) reported increases in lung cancer
mortality with long-term exposure to PM2.5 in the AHSMOG cohort! no association was seen
for PM10-2.5.
7.5.1.1. Lung Cancer Mortality and Incidence
The following sections will examine extensions of the above mentioned cohort studies
and new studies published since the 2004 PM AQCD. The section includes discussion of
both lung cancer incidence and mortality, as well as markers of exposure/susceptibility. A
summary of the mean PM concentrations reported for the new studies is presented in
Table 7.6. In addition, a summary of the associations for lung cancer mortality and
incidence are presented in Table 7.7 and Figure 7.8 (see Section 7.6) Further discussion of
all-cause and cause-specific mortality is presented in Section 7.6.
July 2009
7-101
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Table 7-6. Characterization of ambient PM concentrations from recent studies of cancer and long-
term exposures to PM.
Reference
Location
Pollutant
Mean Annual
Concentration (/^g/m31
Upper Percentile
Concentrations (/^g/m31
Brunekreef et al. (2009,191947)
The Netherlands
PM2.6
28.3
Max: 36.8
Bonner et al. (2005, 088993)
Western NY State
TSP
44
Jerret et al. (2005,189405)
Los Angeles, California
PM2.6
Max:27.1
Laden et al. (2006, 087605)
6 U.S. cities
PM2.6
Range of means across sites: 10.2-29.0
Avg of means across sites: 16.4
Naess et al. (2007, 090736)
Oslo, Norway
PM2.6
15
Max: 22
PM10
19
Max: 30
Palli et al. (2008,156837)
Florence, Italy
PM10
NR
Pedersen et al. (2006,156848)
Czech Republic
PM2.6
Max: 46-120
PM10
Max: 120-238.6
Sorensen et al. (2005,188901)
Copenhagen, Denmark
PM2.6
Range of means across sites: 12.6-20.7
Avg of means across sites: 16.7
75th: 24.3-27.7
Sram et al. (2007,188457)
Czech Republic
PM10
Max: 55
PM2.6
Max: 38
Sram et al. (2007,192084)
Czech Republic
PM10
Range of means across sites: 36.4-55.6
Avg of means across sites: 46.0
PM2.6
Range of means across sites: 24.8-44.4
Avg of means across sites: 34.6
Vineis et al. (2006,192089)
Multi-city, Europe
PM10
Range of means across sites: 19.9-73.4
Avg of means across sites: 35.4
Vinzents et al. (2005, 087482)
Copenhagen, Denmark
PM10
Range of means across sites: 16.9-23.5
Avg of means across sites: 20.2
A subset of the ACS cohort study from 1982-2000 that included only residents of Los
Angeles, California was used to examine the association between PM2.5 and lung cancer
mortality while adjusting for both individual and neighborhood covariates (Jerrett et al.,
2005, 189405). There was a positive association between PM2.5 and lung cancer mortality
when adjusting for 44 individual covariates [RR 1.44 (95% CI: 0.98-2.11) per 10 jug/m3
increase in PM2.5]. However, including all potential individual and neighborhood covariates
associated with mortality reduced the association [RR 1.20 (95% CI: 0.79-1.82) per 10 ug/m3
increase in PM2.5]. A recent re-analysis of the full ACS cohort by the Health Effects Institute
also demonstrated a positive association between PM2.5 and lung cancer mortality [RR 1.11
(95% CP 1.04-1.18)] (Krewski et al., 2009, 191193). The authors observed modification of
this risk by educational attainment, with those completing a high school degree or less
having greater risk. In addition to utilizing the ACS cohort for a nationwide analysis, this
same study conducted two regional assessments, one in the New York City area and the
other in the Los Angeles area. No association was detected between PM2.5 and lung cancer
July 2009
7-102
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
mortality in the analysis of the region included in the New York City analysis. A positive
association was observed in the Los Angeles-area analysis using an unadjusted model, but
this association did not persist after control for individual, ecologic, and co-pollutant
covariates.
The Six Cities Study was extended to include data from 1990-1998, a period including
1,368 deaths and 54,735 person-years (Laden et al., 2006, 087605). An elevated risk ratio
for lung cancer mortality was reported when the entire followup period (1974-1998) was
included in the analysis [RR 1.27 (95% CI 0.96, 1.69) per 10 |ug/m3 increase in average
annual PM2.5]. However, estimated decreases in PM2.5 were not associated with reduced
lung cancer mortality [RR 1.06 (95% CP 0.43-2.62) for every 10 ug/m3 reduction in PM2.5].
Naess et al. (2007, 090736) studied individuals aged 51-90 living in Oslo, Norway in
1992. Death certificate data were obtained for 1992-1998 and information on PM was
collected from 1992-1995. Women had a larger association of lung cancer mortality with
PM2.5 compared to men. Similar results were reported for PM10.
Most recently, Brunekreef et al. (2009, 191947) used the Netherlands cohort study
(NLCS) on diet and cancer to conduct a re-analysis of the research performed by Beelen et
al. (2008, 156263) examining the association between PM and both lung cancer mortality
and incidence. After ten years of followup, there was no association between PM2.5 and lung
cancer mortality for either the analysis of the full cohort (n = 105,296) [RR 1.06 (95% CI
0.82-1.38) per 10 |ug/m3 increase in PM2.5] or the case-cohort (n = 4075) [RR 0.87 (95% CP
0.52-1.47)]. There was also no association with black smoke or traffic density variables,
although living near a major roadway was associated with an elevated relative risk for lung
cancer in the full cohort analysis [RR 1.20 (95% CP 0.98-1.47)]. The association was not
present in the case-cohort analysis [RR 1.07 (95% CP 0.70-1.64)].
In addition to lung cancer mortality, Brunekreef et al. (2009, 191947) also examined
the association with lung cancer incidence using 11.3 years of followup data. In both the
full cohort and the case-cohort analyses no association was reported between PM2.5 and lung
cancer incidence [full cohort: RR 0.81 (95% CP 0.63-1.04); case-cohort: RR 0.67 (95% CP
0.41-1.10) per 10 jug/m3 increase in PM2.5]. The same was true for analyses of black smoke
and traffic density variables.
Table 7-7. Associations* between ambient PM concentrations from select studies of lung cancer
mortality and incidence.
Study
Cohort
Location
Yrs
Analysis subgroup Effect Estimate (95% CI)
MORTALITY PMzs
Dockerv et al. (1993, 044457)*
Six-Cities
Six cities across the U.S.
1974-1991
1.18(0.89-1.57)
Krewski et al. (2000,012281)*
Six-C it ies- Re-analy sis
Six cities across the U.S.
1974-1991
1.16(0.86-1.23)
Laden et al. (2006, 087605)
Six-Cities
Six cities across the U.S.
1974-1998
1.27 (0.96-1.69)
Beelen et al. (2008,156263)
NLCS
Netherlands
1987-1996
Full Cohort 1.06(0.82-1.38)
July 2009
7-103
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Cohort
Location
Yrs
Analysis subgroup
Effect Estimate (95% CI)
Beelen et al. (2008,156263)
NLCS
Netherlands
1987-1996
Case Cohort
0.87 (0.52-1.47)
Brunekreef et al. (2009,191947)
NLCS-Re-analysis
Netherlands
1987-1996
Full Cohort
1.06(0.82-1.38)
Brunekreef et al. (2009,191947)
NLCS-Re-analysis
Netherlands
1987-1996
Case Cohort
0.87 (0.52-1.47)
Pope et al. (1995, 045159)*
ACS
U.S.
1982-1989
1.01 (0.91-1.12)
Pope et al. (2002, 024689)*
ACS
U.S.
1982-2000
1.13(1.04-1.22)
Jerret et al. (2005,189405)
ACS-LA
Los Angeles
1982-2000
Intra-metro Los Angeles
1.44(0.98-2.11)
Krewski et al. (2009,191193)
ACS-Re-analysis
U.S.
1982-2000
1.11 (1.04-1.18)
Krewski et al. (2009,191193)
ACS-Re-analysis
New York City
1982-2000
Intra-metro New York City
0.90 (0.29-2.78)
Krewski et al. (2009,191193)
ACS-Re-analysis
Los Angeles
1982-2000
Intra-metro Los Angeles
1.31 (0.90-1.92)
McDonnell et al. (2000,010319)*
AHSM0G
California
1973-1977
Men
1.39 (0.79-2.46)
Naess et al. (2007, 090736)*
Oslo, Norway
1992-1998
Men, 51-70 yrs
1.18(0.93-1.52)
Naess et al. (2007, 090736)*
Oslo, Norway
1992-1998
Men, 71-90 yrs
1.18(0.93-1.52)
Naess et al. (2007, 090736)*
Oslo, Norway
1992-1998
Women, 51-70 yrs
1.83 (1.36-2.47)
Naess et al. (2007, 090736)*
Oslo, Norway
1992-1998
Women, 71-90 yrs
1.45 (1.05-2.02)
MORTALITY PMw
McDonnell et al. (2000,010319)*
AHSM0G
California
1973-1977
Men
1.23 (0.84-1.80)
Naess et al. (2007, 090736)*
Oslo, Norway
1992-1998
Men, 51-70 yrs
1.12(0.95-1.33)
Naess et al. (2007, 090736)*
Oslo, Norway
1992-1998
Men, 71-90 yrs
1.14(0.97-1.36)
Naess et al. (2007, 090736)*
Oslo, Norway
1992-1998
Women, 51-70 yrs
1.50 (1.23-1.84)
Naess et al. (2007, 090736)*
Oslo, Norway
1992-1998
Women, 71-90 yrs
1.29 (1.03-1.60)
INCIDENCE -PMzs
Beelen et al. (2008,155681)
NLCS
Netherlands
1987-1996
Full Cohort
0.81 (0.63-1.04)
Beelen et al. (2008,155681)
NLCS
Netherlands
1987-1996
Case Cohort
0.65 (0.41-1.04)
Brunekreef et al. (2009,191947)
NLCS-Re-analysis
Netherlands
1987-1996
Full Cohort
0.81 (0.63-1.04)
Brunekreef et al. (2009,191947)
NLCS-Re-analysis
Netherlands
1987-1996
Case Cohort
0.67 (0.41-1.10)
INCIDENCE - PMw
Beesn et al. (1998, 048890)
AHSM0G
California
1977-1992
Men
1.99 (1.32-3.00)
Vineis et al. (2006.192089)
GenAir
Europe
1993-1999
Case-Control
0.91 (0.70-1.18)
*per 10 /yg/m3 increase
tResults from the paper were standardized to10 /yg/m3 [For McDonnell et al. the non-standardized results were reported based on IQR increments (24.3 /yg/m3 for PM2.5 and 29.5 /yg/m3 for PM10).
For Naess et al. the original hazard ratios were calculated based on quartiles of PM exposure. The results were converted to10 /yg/m3 using the mean range of the four quartiles (3.95 /yg/m3 for
PM2.5 and 5.88 /yg/m3 for PM10)].
iStudy was included in the 2004 PM AQCD
The association between PM and incident lung cancers was examined in the European
Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study (EPIC) (Vineis et al., 2006,
192089). Within this cohort, a nested case-control study, the GenAir study, included cases of
incident cancer and controls matched on age, gender, smoking status, country of
recruitment, and time between recruitment and diagnosis. Only non-smokers and former
smokers who had quit smoking at least ten years prior were included. The study included
113 cases and 312 controls. No association was seen between PMio and lung cancer [OR
0.91 (95% CP 0.70-1.18) per 10 |ug/m3]. The OR was elevated when cotinine, a marker for
cigarette exposure, was included in the model but the authors state that this is probably
due to small study size [OR 2.85 (95% CP 0.97-8.33) comparing > 11 jug/m3 to <11 |ug/m3].
July 2009
7-104
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
Control for other potential confounders, such as BMI, education level, and intake of fruit
and vegetables, did not have a large impact on the estimate.
7.5.1.2. Other Cancers
Bonner et al. (2005, 088993) conducted a population-based, case-control study of the
association between ambient exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in early
life and breast cancer incidence among women living in Erie and Niagara counties in the
state of New York. Cases (n = 1166 of which 841 were post-menopausal) were women with
primary breast cancer, and controls (n = 2105 of which 1495 were post-menopausal) were
frequency matched to the cases by age, race, and county of residence. TSP was used as a
proxy for PAH exposure. Annual average TSP concentrations (1959-1997) were obtained
from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation for Erie and Niagara
Counties. Among postmenopausal women, exposure to high concentrations of TSP
(>140 |ug/m3) at birth was associated with an OR of 2.42 for breast cancer (95% CP 0.97-
6.09) relative to low concentrations of TSP (<84 jug/m3). ORs were elevated for pollution
exposures at age ofmenarche (OR: 1.45 [95% CP 0.74-2.87]) and age at first birth (OR: 1.33
[95% CP 0.87-2.06]) among postmenopausal women. Among premenopausal women,
exposure to high concentrations of TSP at birth was associated with an OR for breast
cancer incidence of 1.79 (95% CP 0.62-5.10) relative to low exposure levels, exposure at age
of menarche was associated with an OR of 0.66 (95% CP 0.38-1.16), and exposure at age of
first birth was associated with an OR of 0.52 (95% CP 0.22-1.20).
7.5.1.3. Markers of Exposure or Susceptibility
Several studies looked at markers of exposure or susceptibility as the outcome
associated with short-term exposure. These studies are included here because they may be
relevant to the mechanism that leads to cancer associated with long-term exposures.
A study performed in the Czech Republic compared 53 male policemen working at
least eight hours per day outdoors in urban air with age- and sex-matched controls who
spent at least 90% of their day indoors (n = 52) (Sram et al., 2007, 188457). During the
sampling period, two monitors from downtown and suburban areas detected levels of air
pollutants in the following ranges: PMio 32-55 |ug/m3, P2.5 27"38 |ug/m3, c-PAHs 18-22 ng/m3,
and B[a]P 2.5-3.1 ng/m3 using a VAPS monitor (measurements taken with a HiVol monitor,
which has a lower flow rate, had a mean for PM10 of 62.6 jug/m3). c-PAHs detected on
personal monitors during sampling days had a mean of 12.04 ng/m3 among the policemen
and 6.17 ng/m3 among the controls. No difference in percent of chromosomal aberrations
was observed between the policemen and control group using conventional cytogenetic
analysis. However, using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), a difference in
chromosomal aberrations between the policemen and control group was reported. For
example, the percentage of aberrant cells, as well as the genomic frequency of
July 2009
7-105
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
translocations per 100 cells, was about 1.4-fold greater in the policemen. This was largely
driven by a difference in chromosomal aberrations between nonsmoking policemen and
nonsmoking controls. A similar study that included only the policemen (n = 60), reported
that the mean exposure to c-PAHs and B[a]P for 40-50 days before sampling were
associated with chromosomal aberrations when analyzed with FISH (Sram et al., 2007,
192084). However, when included in a model with other covariates, the association with
these variables was null. No association was present with use of conventional cytogenetic
analysis.
Palli et al. (2008, 156837) investigated the correlation between ambient PMio
concentrations and individual levels of DNAbulky adducts. Study participants were 214
healthy adults aged 35-64 years at enrollment who resided in the city of Florence, Italy.
This study was conducted between 1993 and 1998. PMio exposure levels were based on
daily environmental measures provided by two types of urban monitoring stations (high-
traffic and lowtraffic). The researchers assessed correlation between DNAbulky adducts
measured in blood samples and PMio concentrations prior to blood sample collection. Time
windows of PMio exposure evaluated in this study were 0-5 days, 0-10 days, 0-15 days, 0-30
days, 0-60 days, and 0-90 days prior to blood sample collection. Overall, average PMio
concentrations decreased during the study period, with some fluctuations. Quantitative
values were not reported, but PMio appeared to range between approximately 30 and
100 ug/m3 lor high-traffic stations, and between approximately 20 and 50 ug/ma lor low-
traffic stations. This study found that levels of DNAbulky adducts among non-smoking
workers with occupational traffic exposure were positively correlated with cumulative PMio
levels from high-traffic stations during approximately 2 wk preceding blood sample
collection (0-5 days: r = 0.55, p = 0.03; 0-10 days: r = 0.58, p = 0.02; 0-15 days: r = 0.56,
p = 0.02). DNAbulky adducts were not associated with PMio levels among Florence
residents with no occupational exposure to vehicle emissions or among smokers. DNAbulky
adducts were not associated with PMio levels assessed by low-traffic urban monitoring
stations.
The association between personal exposure to water-soluble transition metals in PM2.5
and oxidative stress-induced DNA damage was investigated among 49 students from
Central Copenhagen, Denmark (Sorensen et al., 2005, 188901). Researchers assessed PM2.5
exposure by personal sampling over two weekday periods twice in 1-yr (November, 1999
and August, 2000), and determined the concentration of water-soluble transition metals (V.
Cr, Fe, Ni, Cu and Pt) in these samples. In addition, lymphocyte and 24-h urine samples
were analyzed for DNA damage by measuring 7-hydro-8-oxo-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodG).
Mean concentrations and corresponding IQR of these metals differed between months of
sample collection. This study found that 8-oxodG concentration in lymphocytes was
significantly associated with V and Cr concentrations, with a 1.9% increase in 8-oxodG per
1 jug/L increase in V concentration and a 2.2% increase in 8-oxodG per 1 jag/L increase in Cr
July 2009
7-106
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
concentration; these associations were independent of the PM2.5 mass concentration. The
other transition metals were not significantly associated with the 8-oxodG concentration in
lymphocytes, and none of the six measured transition metals was associated with the 8*
oxodG concentration in urine.
Vinzents et al. (2005, 087482) investigated the association between ultrafine particles
(UFP) and PM10 concentrations with levels of purine oxidation and strand breaks in DNA
using a crossover design. Study participants were 15 healthy nonsmoking individuals with
a mean age of 25. UFP exposure was evaluated using number concentration obtained in the
breathing zone by portable instruments in six 18"h weekday periods from March to June
2003. Ambient concentrations for PM10 and UFP were also measured on all exposure days
at curbside street stations and at one urban background station. Oxidative DNA damage
was assessed by evaluating strand breaks and oxidized purines in mononuclear cells
isolated from venous blood the morning after exposure measurement. Mean number
concentration of UFPs (street station) was 30.4 x 103UFPs/mL (standard deviation [SD]:
1.38), mean mass concentration of PM10 at a background monitoring station was 16.9 |ug/m3
(SD: 1.53), and mean mass concentration of PM10 at a street station was 23.5 |ug/m3 (SD:
1.48). Mean personal exposure to UFPs was 32.4 x 103 UFPs/mL (SD: 1.49) while bicycling
(5 occasions), 19.6 x 103 UFPs/mL (SD: 1.78) during other outdoor activities (6 occasions),
and 13.4 x 103 UFPs/mL (SD: 1.96) while indoors (6 occasions). The regression coefficients of
the mixed-effects models looking at level of purine oxidation were estimated as 1.50 x 10~3
(95% CI: 0.59 x 10~3 to 2.42 x 10~3; p = 0.002) for cumulative outdoor exposure and 1.07 x
10"3 (95% CI: 0.37 x 10-3 to 1.77 x 10~3! p = 0.003) for cumulative indoor exposure. Neither
cumulative outdoor nor cumulative indoor exposures to UFPs were associated with strand
breaks. Neither ambient air concentrations of PM10 nor number concentrations of UFPs at
monitoring stations were significant predictors of DNA damage.
Additionally, a number of studies employed ecologic study designs, comparing the
prevalence of biomarkers in populations from more polluted locations to those in less
polluted locations. In a pilot study conducted in the Czech Republic (Pedersen et al., 2006,
156848), children age 5-11 provided 5 mL blood samples and the frequency of micronuclei in
peripheral blood lymphocytes was analyzed for cytogenetic effects. Significantly higher
frequencies of micronuclei were found in younger children living in Teplice (PM2.5
concentration = 120 ug/m") than in Prachatice (PM2.5 concentration = 46 ug/m3). The levels
of c-PAHs were also much higher in Teplice (nearly 30 ng/m3 in Teplice and about 15 ng/m3
in Prachatice). The difference in micronuclei frequencies observed in the children from the
two locations may be attributable to differences in exposure to air pollution, but could also
be due to differences in diet or other environmental exposures. This finding is noteworthy
considering micronuclei formation in peripheral blood lymphocytes is thought to be
biologically relevant for carcinogenesis.
July 2009
7-107
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
Avogbe et al. (2005, 087811) showed that there appeared to be a correlation between
the level of oxidative DNA damage in individuals and exposure to ambient ultrafine
particulate matter. Formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase sensitive sites and the presence
of DNA strand breaks were assessed from blood and urine samples obtained from healthy,
non-smoking male volunteers that lived and worked in different areas of Cotonou, Benin.
Exposure to benzene was assessed by urinary excretion of S-phenylmercapturic acid. There
was a high degree of correlation between exposure to benzene and ultrafine particles and
the presence of DNA strand breaks and formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase sensitive
sites (rural subjects < suburban subjects < residents living near high traffic roads < taxi
drivers). Genotyping studies showed that the magnitude of the effects of benzene and
ultrafine particulates may be modified by polymorphisms in GSTP1 and NQOl genes.
Tovalin et al. (2006, 091322) evaluated the association between exposure to air
pollutants and the level of DNA damage using the single cell gel electrophoreis (comet)
assay. Mononuclear lymphocytes from outdoor and indoor workers from two areas in
Mexico, Mexico City (large city) and Puebla (medium size city), were evaluated. The
outcomes showed that the outdoor workers in Mexico City exhibited greater DNA damage
than indoor workers in the same region. Similar levels of DNA damage were observed
between indoor and outdoor workers in Puebla. The level of observed DNA damage was
correlated with exposure to ozone and PM2.5.
In summary, several recent studies have reported an association between lung cancer
mortality and long-term PM2.5 exposure. Although many of the estimates include the null in
the confidence interval, overall the results have shown a positive relationship. The two
recent studies that looked at lung cancer incidence did not report an association with PM2.5
(Brunekreef et al., 2009, 191947) or PM10 (Vineis et al., 2006, 192089). Studies of
exposure/susceptibility markers have reported inconsistent outcomes, with some markers
being associated with PM and others not.
7.5.2. Toxicological Studies
Over the past 30 years numerous mutagenicity and ge no toxicity studies of ambient
PM and their contributing sources have been conducted to assess the relative mutagenic or
genotoxic potential. Studies previously reviewed in the 2004 PM AQCD (U.S. EPA, 2004,
056905) provide compelling evidence that ambient PM and PM from specific combustion
sources (e.g., fossil fuels) are mutagenic in vivo and in vitro. Research cited in the 2004
AQCD demonstrated mutagenic activity of ambient PM from urban centers in California,
Germany and the Netherlands. These studies suggested that ubiquitous emission sources,
particularly motor vehicle emissions, rather than isolated point sources were largely
responsible for the mutagenic effects. In addition, the mutagenicity was dependent upon
the chemical composition of the PM with unsubstituted polyaromatic compounds and semi-
July 2009
7-108
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
polar compounds being highly mutagenic. Mutagenicity was also dependent on size, with
the fine fraction of urban PM having greater effects than the coarse fraction. Genotoxic
activity was demonstrated for ambient PM from two high traffic areas (one upwind and one
downwind) and a rural site. In addition, the 2004 AQCD reported that exhausts from
gasoline and diesel engines were mutagenic and that DE was more potent. More
mutagenicity was observed for exhaust from cold starts than starts at room temperature.
Both gaseous and particulate fractions of DE were found to be mutagenic. Sequential
fractionation of extracts from gasoline and diesel exhaust implicated the polar fractions,
especially nitrated polynuclear aromatic compounds, as contributing greatly to
mutagenicity. Among some of the other mutagenically active compounds found in the gas
phase of DE are ethylene, benzene, 1.3-butadiene, acrolein and several PAHs, all of which
are also present in gasoline exhaust. Also cited in the 2004 AQCD were studies
demonstrating mutagenic effects of emissions from wood/biomass burning, which were
primarily attributable to the organic fraction and not the condensate. It was noted that
wood smoke induced both frameshift mutations and base pair substitution but not DNA
adducts. Further, emissions from coal combustion in China were found to be mutagenic,
with both polar and aromatic fractions contributing to effects. Little data were available on
the mutagenicity of coal fly ash emissions from U.S. conventional combustion plants. In
conclusion, these studies provide evidence that ambient PM and combustion-derived PM
are mutagenic/genotoxic. The 2004 AQCD noted that there is not a simple relationship
between mutagenic potential and carcinogenic potential in animals or humans. No studies
evaluating carcinogenic effects of PM were reported in the 2004 AQCD.
Building on results of earlier studies in the 2004 PM AQCD, data from newly
published studies that evaluated the mutagenic, genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of PM,
1'M-constituents, and combustion emission source particles are reviewed. Pertinent studies
are described briefly in the following paragraphs. A summary table is provided in Annex D
(Tables D7-D9).
7.5.2.1. Mutagenesis and Genotoxicity
In Vitro Studies
In general, studies have focused on PM and PM extracts for mutagenicity testing
using bacteria and mammalian cell lines. PM and/or PM extracts from ambient air samples,
wood smoke, and coal, diesel, or gasoline combustion have all been reported to induce
mutation in S. typhimurium and in cultured human cells (Abou Chakra et al., 2007,
098819; Gabelova et al., 2007, 156457; Gabelova et al., 2007, 156458; Hannigan et al., 1997,
083598; Hornberg et al., 1998, 155849). In addition, effects associated with PM and PM-
associated constituents include induction of micronucleated reticulocytes (MN) formation,
DNA adduct formation, SCE, DNA strand breaks, frameshifts and inhibition of gap-
July 2009
7-109
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
junctional intercellular communication (Alink et al., 1998, 087159; Arlt et al., 2007, 097257;
Avogbe et al., 2005, 087811; Gabelova et al., 2007, 156457; Gabelova et al., 2007, 156458;
Healey et al., 2006, 156532; Hornberg et al., 1996, 087164; Hornberg et al., 1998, 155849;
Sevastyanova et al., 2007, 156969)
Constituents adsorbed onto individual particles play a large role in the genotoxic
potential of PM. Poma et al. (2006, 096903) showed that fine carbon black particles were
consistently less genotoxic than similar concentrations of PM2.5 extracts, suggesting that
the adsorbed components play a role in the genotoxic potential of PM. Total PAH and
carcinogenic PAH content is correlated with the genotoxic effects of PM (De Kok et al.,
2005, 088656; Sevastyanova et al., 2007, 156969). Comparison of different extracts (water
vs. organic) by Gutierrez-Castillo et al. (2006, 089030) indicated that water soluble extracts
were more genotoxic than the corresponding organic extracts. Sharma et al. (2007, 156975)
reported that mutagenic activity of extracted PM samples collected in and around a waste
incineration plant was attributed to the moderately polar and polar fractions. The polar and
crude fractions were mutagenic without metabolic activation, suggesting a direct mutagenic
effect. No mutagenic activity was observed from any of the nonpolar samples evaluated.
Arlt and colleagues (2007, 097257) have shown that the PM constituents 2-
nitrobenzanthrone and 3-nitrobenzanthrone were genotoxic in a variety of bacterial and
mammalian cell systems.
Conflicting data have been reported for the role of metabolic enzymes on the
genotoxicity of PM and their adsorbed constituents. Arlt et al. (2007, 097257) reported that
the PM constituent 2-nitrobenzanthrone (2-NB) was genotoxic in bacterial and mammalian
cells. However, metabolic activation with the human N-acetyl transferase 2 or
sulfotransferase (SULT1A1) enzyme was needed for the effect to be observed in human
cells. Erdinger et al. (2005, 156423) demonstrated that mutagenic activity was not affected
when metabolism was induced, de Kok et al. (2005, 088656) evaluated the relationship
between the physical, chemical, and genotoxic effects of ambient PM. TSP, PM10, and PM2.5
were sampled at different locations and the extracts were assessed for mutagenicity and
induction of DNA adducts in cells. Overall, induction of rat liver S9 metabolism generally
reduced the mutagenic potential via the Ames assay of the particle fractions and DNA
reactivity (induction of DNA adducts) was generally higher after metabolic activation.
Binkova et al. (2003, 156274) found that the addition of S9 increased PMicrdependent DNA
adduct formation.
Ambient Air
A limited number of studies evaluated the impact of the season on the genotoxic
effects of ambient PM. A few studies however have indicated that greater genotoxic effects
were associated with samples collected during the winter months compared to those
collected in the summer (Abou Chakra et al., 2007, 098819; Gabelova et al., 2007, 156457;
Gabelova et al., 2007, 156458). In contrast, Hannigan et al. (1997, 083598) indicated that
July 2009
7-110
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
no seasonal variation was observed. Studies have also shown that greater genotoxic effects
were associated with smaller particle size extracts (e.g., PM2.5>PMio) and from samples
collected in urban areas or closer to higher trafficked areas (Abou Chakra et al., 2007,
098819; Hornberg et al., 1998, 155849).
de Kok et al. (2005, 088656) found the direct mutagenicity (Ames assay) and the
direct DNA reactivity (DNA adduct formation) of the PM2.5 size fraction was significantly
higher than that of the larger size fractions (TSP, PM10) at most locations.
DNA damage was assessed by the Comet assay in A549 cells exposed to PM collected
from a high traffic area in Copenhagen, Denmark (TSP approximately 30 ug/m3) and
compared to the results from exposure of A549 cells to standard reference materials
(SRM1650 or SRM2975) at the same concentrations (2.5-250 |ug/ml) (Danielsen et al., 2008,
192092). All three particles induced strand breaks and oxidized purines in a dose-dependent
manner and there were no obvious differences in potency. In contrast, only the ambient PM
formed 8-oxo-7,8"dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodG) when incubated with calf thymus
DNA, which may be due to the levels of transition metals.
Diesel and Gasoline Exhaust
Automobile DEP (A-DEP) was tested in S. typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, and its
derivatives (e.g., TA98NR and YG1021) and found to be more mutagenic than forklift DEP
(i.e., SRM2975) particles, based on PM mass. A-DEP had 227 times more PAH-type
mutagenic activity and 8-45 times more nitroarene-type mutagenic activity due to the
different conditions for generating and collecting the two DEP samples (DeMarini et al.,
2004, 066329). Using a diesel engine without an oxidation catalytic converter (OCC), the
diesel engine exhaust particle (DEP) extract produced the highest number of revertant
colonies in strains TA98 and TA100 with and without S9 at several tested loads when
compared to extracts from lowsulfur diesel fuel (LSDF), rapeseed oil methyl ester (RME),
and soybean oil methyl ester (SME). When an OCC was installed in the exhaust pipe of the
engine, all extracts reduced the number of revertant colonies in both strains with and
without S9 at partial loads but increased the number of revertant colonies without S9 at
rated power. At idling, DEP extracts increased the number of revertant colonies with and
without S9 (Bunger et al., 2006, 156303). In a separate study, engine emissions (particle
extracts and condensates) from rapeseed (canola) oil were found to produce greater
mutagenic effects in S. typhimurium strains TA98 and TA100 than DEP (Bunger et al.,
2007, 156304). Additionally, DE extract (DEE) from diesel fuel containing various
percentages of ethanol was also observed to induce mutational response in two Salmonella
strains. Base diesel fuel DEE and DEE from fuel with 20% ethanol caused more significant
DNA damage in rat fibrocytes L-929 cells than extracts containing 5, 10, or 15% ethanol
(Song et al., 2007, 188903).
DE and gasoline engine exhaust particles, as well as their semi-volatile organic
compound (SVOC) extracts, induced mutations in the two S. typhimurium strains YG1024
July 2009
7-111
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
and YG1029 in the absence and presence of S9; the PM extracts were more mutagenic than
the SVOC extracts. Additionally, all extracts except the DE extract induced DNA damage
and MN in Chinese hamster lung V79 cells (Liu et al., 2005, 192098). Another study
demonstrated that gasoline engine exhaust significantly increased colony formation in
TA98 with and without S9 (Zhang et al., 2007, 157186).
Jacobsen et al. (2008, 156597) used the FEl-Muta™ Mouse lung epithelial cell line to
investigate putative mechanisms of DEP-induced mutagenicity. Mutation ion frequencies
and ROS were determined after cells were incubated with 37.5 or 75 ug/ml DEP (SRM1650)
for 72-h (n = 8). The mutation frequency at the 75 ug/ml dose was significantly increased
(l.55-fold; p<0.00l) in contrast to cells treated with 37.5 |ug/ml DEP. DEP induced ROS
generation 1.6-1.9-fold in the epithelial cell cultures after 3 hours of exposure compared
with the 3-10-fold increase in ROS production previously reported for carbon black. The
authors concluded that the mutagenic activity of DEP is likely attributable to activity from
the organic fraction that both contains reactive species and can generate ROS.
In human A549 and CHO-K1 cells, the organic fraction of DEP significantly increased
the amount of Comet and MN formation, respectively, in the presence and absence of SKF-
525A (a CYP450 inhibitor) and S9, respectively (Oh and Chung, 2006, 088296). The organic
base and neutral fractions of DEP also significantly induced DNA damage but only without
SKF-525A, and all fractions but the moderately polar fraction (phthalates and PAH
oxyderivatives) induced MN formation with and without S9 (Bao et al., 2007, 097258).
Gasoline engine exhaust significantly induced DNA damage as measured in the Comet
assay and increased the frequency of MN in human A549 cells (Zhang et al., 2007, 157186).
In human-hamster hybrid (Al) cells, DEP (SRM 2975) dose-dependently increased the
mutation yield at the CD59 locus! this was significantly reduced by simultaneous treatment
with phagocytosis inhibitors (Bao et al., 2007, 097258).
Wood Smoke
The mutagenicity of wood smoke (WS) and cigarette smoke (CS) extracts was assayed
in Salmonella typhimuriuni strains TA98 and TA100 (Ames assay) using the pre-incubation
assay with exogenous metabolic activation (rat liver S-9). Extracts of both samples (62.5 or
125 ug TPM equivalent/ml) were equally mutagenic to strain TA98 but the WS extract was
less mutagenic than the CS extracts in strain TA100 (Iba et al., 2006, 156582).
In vivo studies
Ambient Air
The contribution of ambient urban roadside air exposure (4, 12, 24, 48 or 60 wk) to
DNA damage was examined in the lungs, nasal mucosa, and livers of adult male Wistar
rats in Kawasaki, Japan (Sato et al., 2003, 096615). Messenger RNA levels of CYP450
enzymes that catalyze the transformation of PAHs to reactive metabolites were also
July 2009
7-112
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
evaluated. Concentrations of gases were reported to be 12-182 ppb NO and 0-9 ppb NO2 in
the filtered air chamber and 33-280 ppb NO and 42-81 ppb NO2 in the experimental group
chamber. Suspended PM concentrations were 11-19 ug/m3 in the filtered air chamber and
42-100 |ug/m3 (average 63 ug/m3) in the experimental group chamber. Body weight
significantly decreased in exposed animals at 24, 48 and 60 wk. Exposure of 4 wk to urban
roadside air resulted in significant increases in multiple DNA adducts (lung, nasal, and
liver DNA adducts). With longer exposures, there were significant increases in lung (48 wk),
nasal (60 wk), and liver DNA adducts (60 wk). Changes were seen in CYP1A2 mRNA at
4 wk with a 2.3 fold increase in exposed animals compared to the control group with no
change observed at 60 wk; CYP1A1 mRNA was unchanged. These results indicate that
exposure to ambient air in this roadside area could induce DNA adduct formation, which
may be important for carcinogenicity. Earlier studies (Ichinose et al., 1997, 053264) have
shown that 8-oxo-dG, a DNA adduct, is elevated along with tumor formation in a dose-
dependent manner in mice administered DEP. The finding of adducts in the liver indicated
that deposition of PM and its associated PAHs in the lung can have indirect effects on
extrapulmonary organs. It should be noted that PM deposition on the fur and ingestion
during grooming cannot be ruled out as a possible exposure route.
Another animal toxicological study employed "non-carcinogenic" particles obtained
from pooled non-cancerous lung tissue collected during surgical lung resection from three
non-smoking male patients diagnosed with lung adenocarcinomas (Tokiwa et al., 2005,
191952). Particles were partially purified to remove organic compounds. Morphologically
the particles were similar to DE or ambient air PM and the organic extracts from the
particles were directly mutagenic in S. typhimurium tester strains TA98, YG1021 and
YG1024. BALB/c and ICR mice were intratrachaelly instilled with particles at doses of 0.25,
0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 mg/mouse. After 24 hours, 8-oxo-dG was measured in lung DNA and found to
be increased in ICR mice in a dose-dependent manner, reaching a maximum of-2.75 8-oxo-
dG/105 dG at the 2.0 mg dose. The response was statistically significant at doses of 0.5, 1.0,
and 2.0 mg. The increased 8-oxo-dG levels observed in vivo was reported to be likely due to
hydroxyl radicals presumed to be involved in phagocytosis of non-mutagenic particles by
inflammatory cells that could induce hydroxylation of guanine residue on DNA.
Diesel Exhaust
An in vivo study employed gtp delta transgenic mice carrying the lambda EG10 on
each Chromosome 17 from a C57BL/6J background to investigate the effects of DEP on
mutation frequency (Hashimoto et al., 2007, 097261). Mice were exposed via inhalation to
DEP or via IT instillation to DEP or DEP extract and lambda EG10 phages were rescued!
E. coli YG6020was infected with the phage and screened for 6-thioguanine resistance. The
mutagenic potency (mutation frequency per mg) caused by DEP extract was twice that of
DEP, suggesting that the mutagenicity of DEP is attributed primarily to compounds in the
extract, since «50% of the weight of DEP was provided by the extract. Interestingly, there
July 2009
7-113
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
was no difference in mutation frequency between the 1 and 3 mg/m3 DEP groups after
12 wk of exposure.
Wood Smoke
One recent study measured the effect of freshly generated hard wood smoke (HWS) on
CYP1A1 activity based on ethoxyresorufin Odeethylase in pulmonary microsomes
recovered from male Sprague-Dawley rats exposed to HWS by nose-only inhalation
exposure (Iba et al., 2006, 156582). CYP1A1 activity in rat lung explants treated with
extracts of the total PM (TPM) from HWS samples and from freshly generated cigarette
smoke (CS) was also evaluated. Unlike CS, HWS did not induce pulmonary CYP1A1
activity or mRNA (assessed by northern blot analysis) nor did extracts of HWS TPM induce
CYP1A1 protein (assessed by western blot analysis) in cultured rat lung explants. The
results suggest that unique constituents that are activated by CYP1A1 may be present in
CS but not HWS.
7.5.2.2. Carcinogenesis
Studies published prior to the 2004 AQCD that evaluated the carcinogenicity of
ambient air were reviewed by Claxton and Woodall (2007, 180391). Five studies involved
chronic inhalation exposures in rodents. No statistically significant increase in
tumorigenesis was observed following chronic exposure to urban air pollution in Los
Angeles (Gardner, 1966, 015129; Gardner et al., 1969, 015130; Wayne and Chambers, 1968,
038537). However in a study conducted in Brazil, urban air pollution was found to enhance
the formation of urethane-induced lung tumors in mice (Cury et al., 2000, 192100; Reymao
et al., 1997, 084653).
Two recent studies evaluated the carcinogenic potential of chronic inhalation
exposures to DE (Reed et al., 2004, 055625) and hardwood smoke (HWS) (Reed et al., 2006,
156043). Two indicators of carcinogenic potential, formation of MN and tumorogenesis were
measured in strain A/J mice, which is a mouse model that spontaneously develops lung
tumors. Exposure to DE or HWS at concentrations of 1000 pg/m3 and below did not cause
increased formation of MN or an increased rate of lung tumors in this cancer-prone rodent
model. These studies are described below.
Diesel Exhaust
A/J mice were exposed to 30, 100, 300 and 1000 pg/m3 DE for 6 h/day and 7 days/wk
for 6 months (Reed et al., 2004, 055625). The concentration of gases in this including NOx,
NO2, CO, SO2, NH3, methane, non-methane VOC, and FID total hydrocarbon ranged from
control to high dose group values of 0 to 50.4 ± 0.6 ppm, 0.2 ± 0.2 to 6.9 ± 3.3 ppm, 0.3 ±0.1
to 30.9 ± 4.5 ppm, not detectable to 955.2 ± 58.4 ppb, 176.5 ± 8.8 to 9.1 ± 0.2 |ug/m3, 1406.5 ±
253.2 to 2642.1 ± 455.9 |ug/m3, 134.0 ± 52.1 to 1578.6 ± 256.2 |ug/m3, 0.1 ± 0.1 to 2.2 ± 0.2
ppm, respectively. Particle sizes in the 4 exposure groups ranged from 0.10-0.15 pm mass
July 2009
7-114
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
median aerodynamic diameter with geometric standard deviations of 1.4-1.8. Following the
6 month exposure and a 6 month recovery period, mice were collected and MN formation in
blood and tumor multiplicity and tumor incidence were measured in lungs. No increases in
formation of MN or numbers of lung adenomas were observed in DE-exposed mice
compared with controls.
Wood Smoke
A/J mice were exposed to 30, 100, 300 and 1000 pg/m3 HWS for 30, 100, 300 and 1000
pg/m3 DE for 6 h/day and 7 days/wk for 6 month (Reed et al., 2006, 156043). Gaseous
components of the HWS included CO, NH3, and non-methane VOC with concentrations
from control levels to high dose HWS exposure ranging from 229 ± 31 to 14887.6 ± 832.3
ppm, 139.3 ± 2.3 to 54.9 ± 1.2 jug/m3 and 177.6 ± 10.4 to 3455.0 ± 557.2 |ug/m3, respectively.
Concentrations of NOx, NO2 and SO2 were reported to be null. Particle sizes in the 4 exposure groups
ranged from 0.25-0.36 pm mass median aerodynamic diameter with geometric standard
deviations of 2.0-3.3. Following the 6 month exposure and a 6-month recovery period, mice
were collected and MN formation in blood and tumor multiplicity and tumor incidence were
measured in lungs. No increases in formation of MN or numbers of lung adenomas were
observed in HWS-exposed mice compared with controls. However, HWS from this study was
mutagenic in the Ames reverse mutation assay.
In summary, numerous new in vitro studies confirm and extend findings reported in
the 2004 AQCD that ambient PM from urban sites and combustion-derived PM are
mutagenic and genotoxic. A small number of new studies were conducted in vivo. One of
these studies demonstrated increased mutagenic potency in mice exposed to DEP and DEP
extract. Another study found increased formation of 8-oxo-dG, a DNA adduct, following
intratracheal instillation of PM in mice. A chronic inhalation study of rats exposed to urban
roadside air reported increased formation of DNA adducts in nose, lung, and liver and
induction of CYP1A2. Inhalation exposure of rats to HWS failed to induce CYP1A1 in
another study. Finally, two chronic inhalation studies found no evidence of carcinogenic
potential for DE and HWS in a cancer-prone mouse model. Collectively, these results
provide some evidence, mainly from in vitro studies, to support the biological plausibility of
ambient PM-lung cancer relationships observed in epidemiology studies.
7.5.3. Epigenetic Studies and Other Heritable DNA mutations
Two epidemiologic epigenetic studies examined the effect of PM on DNA methylation. Both
studies examined methylation of Alu and long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1) sequences, which
are located in repetitive elements. In previous studies, methylation of these sequences has been linked to
global genomic DNA methylation content (Weisenberger et al., 2005, 192101; Yang et al., 2004,
192102).
July 2009
7-115
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
The first study included men age 55 and older who were part of the Normative Aging Study in the
Boston area. A stationary monitoring site located 1 km from the examination site was used to estimate
ambient PM2 5 exposure for the duration of the study (1999-2007). During the study period, the median
level of PM25j averaged over 7 day periods, was 9.8 |ig/m3 (interquartile range 8.0-12.0 |ig/m3). There
was no association between PM25 and Alu methylation. LINE-1 methylation was associated with PM2 5
measured over the 7 days before the examinations.
The second study included 63 healthy men aged 27 to 55 working at an electric furnace steel
plant (Tarantini et al., 2009, 192010). Blood samples were taken twice, once in the morning after two
days of not working and once in the morning after three full days of work. PMi0 was measured in 11 work
areas and individuals completed daily logs about the amount of time spent in each area. On average,
individuals had an estimated exposure of 233.4 |ig/m3 PM10 (range 73.4-1220.2 |ig/m3). Short-term
exposure did not alter the methylation of Alu and LINE-1. To examine effects of long-term exposure,
both blood samples were considered independent of time, and Alu and LINE-1 were examined with
respect to overall estimated PMi0 exposure using mixed effects models. There was a negative association
between increasing levels of PMi0 exposure and Alu and LINE-1 methylation, indicating that PM10 causes
epigenetic changes to occur with long-term exposure. This study also looked at levels of inducible nitric
oxide synthase gene (iNOS), which is a gene suppressed by DNA methylation. iNOS expression was not
associated with long term exposure to PMi0 but was affected by methylation in the short term.
Animal toxicology studies evaluating the effect of PM exposure on changes in the
epigenome and other non-epigenetic heritable DNA changes have only recently been
conducted. After earlier work showed increased germline mutation rates in herring gulls
nesting near steel mills on Lake Ontario (Yauk and Quinn, 1996, 157163) further work was
conducted to address air-dependent contribution to germline mutations by housing male
and female Swiss Webster mice in the same area and comparing mutation rates in those
animals with mutation rates of animals housed in a rural setting with less air pollution
(Somers et al., 2002, 078100). To determine if PM or the gaseous phase of the urban air was
responsible for heritable mutations, Yauk et al. (2008, 157164) exposed mature male
C57BlxCBAFl hybrid mice to either HEPA-filtered air or to ambient air in Hamilton,
Ontario, Canada for 3 or 10 wk, or 10 wk plus 6 wk of clean air exposure (16 wk). Sperm
DNA was monitored for expanded simple tandem repeat (ESTR) mutations, testicular
sample bulky DNA adducts, and DNA single or double strand breaks. In addition, male-
germ line (spermatogonial stem cell) DNA methylation was monitored post-exposure. This
area in Hamilton is near 2 steel mills and a major highway. Air composition showed mean
concentrations for TSP of 93.8 ± 17 |ug/m3, PAH of 8.3 ± 1.7 ng/m3, and metal of 3.6 ± 0.7
pg/m3. Mutation frequency at ESTR Ms6"hm locus in sperm DNA from mice exposed 3 or
10 wk did not show elevated ESTR mutation frequencies, but there was a significant
increase in ESTR mutation frequency at 16 wk compared to HEPA-filter control animals,
pointing to a PM-dependent mechanism of action. No detectable DNA adducts were
observed in testes samples at any of the time points monitored. To verify inhalation
July 2009
7-116
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
exposure to particles, DNA adducts were reported in the lungs of mice exposed for 3 wk to
ambient-air! no other time points showed detectable DNA adduct formation.
Hypermethylation of germ-line DNA was also observed in mice exposed to ambient air for
10 and 16 wk. These PM-dependent epigenetic modifications (hypermethylation) were not
seen in the halploid stage (3 wk) of spermatogenesis, but were nonetheless seen in early
stages of spermatogenesis (10 wk) and remained significantly elevated in mature sperm
even after removal of the mouse from the environmental exposure (16 wk). Thus, these
studies indicate that the ambient PM phase and not the gaseous phase is responsible for
the increased frequency of heritable DNA mutations and epigenetic modifications.
Based on the limited evidence from these epigenetics studies, long-term exposure to
PMio may result in epigenetic changes. PM2.5 also potentially affects some DNA methylation
content. As epigenetic research progresses, future studies examining the relationship
between PM and DNA methylation will be important in more thoroughly characterizing
these associations.
The effect of ambient PM on heritable DNA mutations and the epigenome has been
well characterized in a Canadian steel mill area. Mice exposed to ambient PM plus gases
developed paternally-derived heritable DNA mutations and epigenetic changes in sperm
DNA that were not observed in mice exposed to ambient air that was HEPA-filtered. This is
the first animal toxicology study showing heritable effects of PM exposure on DNA
mutation and the epigenome. Because the epigenetics field is so new, further work in this
emerging area will expand on these PM-dependent methylation changes to determine if the
results can be recapitulated at other urban sites.
7.5.4. Summary and Causal Determinations
The 2004 PM AQCD reported on original and follow-up analyses for three prospective
cohort studies that reported positive relationships between PM2.5 and lung cancer mortality.
Several recent, well-conducted epidemiologic studies have extended the evidence for a
positive association between PM2.5 and lung cancer mortality (Section 7.5.1.1). Generally,
studies have not reported associations between long-term exposure to PM2.5 or PM10 and
lung cancer incidence (Section 7.5.1.1). Animal toxicological studies did not focus on specific
size fractions of PM, but rather examined ambient PM, woodsmoke, and DEP (Section
7.5.2). A number of recent studies indicate that ambient urban PM, emissions from
wood/biomass burning, emissions from coal combustion, and gasoline and DE are
mutagenic and that PAHs are ge no toxic (Section 7.5.2). These findings are consistent with
earlier studies that concluded that ambient PM and PM from specific combustion sources
are mutagenic and genotoxic and provide biological plausibility for the results observed in
the epidemiologic studies. A limited number of epidemiologic and toxicological studies on
the epigenome demonstrate that PM induces changes in methylation (Section 7.5.3), a new
July 2009
7-117
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
area of research that will likely be expanded in the future. However, it has yet to be
determined how these alterations in the genome could influence the initiation and
promotion of cancer. Overall, the evidence is suggestive of a causal relationship between
relevant PM2.5 exposures and cancer, with the strongest evidence from the epidemiologic studies
of lung cancer mortality. This evidence is limited by the non-specific measure of PM size
fraction in some of the epidemiologic studies and most of the animal toxicological studies,
and the inconsistency in evidence with recent epidemiologic studies for an effect on cancer
incidence. There is no epidemiologic evidence for cancer related to long-term exposure to
PM in organs or systems other than the lung. The evidence is inadequate to assess the
association between PM10-2.5 and UFP exposures and cancer.
7.6. Mortality Associated with Long-term Exposure
In the 1996 PM AQCD, results were presented for three prospective cohort studies of
adult populations: the Six Cities Study (Dockery et al., 1993, 044457); the American Cancer
Society (ACS) Study (Pope CAet al., 1995, 045159); and the California Seventh Day
Adventist (AHSMOG) Study (Abbey et al., 1995, 000669). The 1996 AQCD concluded that
the chronic exposure studies, taken together, suggested associations between increases in
mortality and long-term exposure to fine PM, though there was no evidence to support an
association with PM10-2.5 (U.S. EPA, 1996, 079380).
Discussions of mortality and long-term exposure to PM in the 2004 PM AQCD
emphasized the results of four U.S. prospective cohort studies, but the greatest weight was
placed on the findings of the ACS and the Harvard Six Cities studies, which had each
undergone extensive independent reanalysis, and which were based on cohorts that were
broadly representative of the U.S. population. The 2004 PM AQCD concluded that the
results from the Seventh-Day Adventist (AHSMOG) cohort provided some suggestive (but
less conclusive) evidence for associations, while results from the Veterans Cohort provided
inconsistent evidence for associations between long-term exposures to PM2.5 and mortality.
Collectively, the 2004 PM AQCD found that these studies provided strong evidence that
long-term exposure to PM2.5 was associated with increased risk of human mortality. Effect
estimates for all-cause mortality ranged from 6 to 13% increased risk per 10 ug/m3 PM2.5,
while effect estimates for cardiopulmonary mortality ranged from 6 to 19% per 10 ug/m3
PM2.5. For lung cancer mortality, the effect estimate was a 13% increase per 10 ug/m3 PM2.5,
based upon the results of the extended analysis from the ACS cohort (Pope CAet al., 2002,
024689). With regard to thoracic coarse particles, the 2004 PM AQCD reported that no
association was observed between mortality and long-term exposure to PM10-2.5 in the ACS
study (Pope CAet al., 2002, 024689), while a positive but statistically non-significant
association was reported in males in the AHSMOG cohort (McDonnell et al., 2000, 010319).
Thus, the 2004 PM AQCD concluded that there was insufficient evidence for associations
July 2009
7-118
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
between long-term exposure to thoracic coarse particles and mortality. Overall, the 2004
PM AQCD concluded that there was strong epidemiologic evidence for associations between
long-term exposures to PM2.5 and excess all-cause and cardiopulmonary mortality.
At the time of the 2004 PM AQCD, only a limited number of the chronic-exposure
cohort studies had considered direct measurements of constituents of PM, other than
sulfates. With regard to source-oriented evaluations of mortality associations with long-
term exposure, the 2004 PM AQCD noted only the study by Hoek et al. (2002, 042364), in
which the authors concluded that long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution may
shorten life expectancy. However, Hoek et al. (2002, 042364) also noted that living near a
major road might include other factors that contribute to mortality associations. There was
not sufficient evidence at the time of the 2004 PM AQCD to draw conclusions on effects
associated with specific components or sources of PM.
New epidemiologic evidence reports a consistent association between long-term
exposure to PM2.5 and increased risk of mortality. There is little evidence for the long-term
effects of PM10-2.5 on mortality. Although this section focuses on mortality outcomes in
response to long-term exposure to PM, it does not evaluate studies that examine the
association between PM and infant mortality. These studies are evaluated in Section 7.5-
"Reproductive, developmental, prenatal and neonatal outcomes associated with long-term
exposure to PM" because it is possible that in utero exposures contribute to infant
mortality. A summary of the mean PM concentrations reported for the studies characterized
in this section is presented in Table 7-8.
Table 7-8. Characterization of ambient PM concentrations from studies of mortality and long-term
exposures to PM.
Reference
Location
Mean Concentration
(*/fl/m31
Upper Percentile Concentrations (/^g/m31
PM2.5
Brunekreef et al. (2009,191947)
The Netherlands
28
95th: 32
99th: 33
Max: 37
Chen et al. (2005, 087942)
Multicity, CA
29.0
Eftim et al. (2008, 099104)
U.S.
13.6-14.1
Max: 19.1-25.1
Enstrom (2005, 087356)
CA
23.4
Max: 36.1
Goss et al. (2004, 055624)
U.S.
13.7
75th: 15.9
Janes et al. (2007, 090927)
U.S.
14.0
Jerrett et al. (2005,189405)
Los Angeles, CA
Max: 27.1
Krewski et al. (2009,191193)
U.S.
14.02
75th: 16.00
90th: 26.75
95th: 27.89
Max: 30.01
Laden et al. (2006, 087605)
Multicity, U.S.
10.2-29.0
July 2009
7-119
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Reference
Location
Mean Concentration
(j/g/m31
Upper Percentile Concentrations (/^g/m31
Lipfert et al. (2006, 088218)
U.S.
14.3
Miller et al. (2007, 090130)
U.S.
13.5
75th: 18.3
Max: 28.3
Pope et al. (2004, 055880)
U.S.
17.1
Schwartz et al. (2008,156963)
Multicity, U.S.
17.5
Max: 40
Zeper et al. (2007,157176)
U.S.
17.0
Zegeret al. (2008, 19 1 951)
U.S.
13.2
75th: 14.9
PM10-2.5
Chen et al. (2005, 087942)
Multicity, CA
25.4
Lipfert etal. (2006, 088218)
U.S.
16.0
PMio
Chen et al. (2005, 087942)
Multicity, CA
52.6
Gehring et al. (2006, 089797)
North Rhine,
Germany
43.7-48.0
Max: 52.5-56.1
Goss et al. (2004, 055624)
U.S.
24.8
75th: 28.9
Puett et al. (2008,156891)
NE U.S.
21.6
Zanobetti et al. (2008,156177)
U.S.
29.4
7.6.1. Recent Studies of Long-Term Exposure to PM and
Mortality
Studies since the last PM AQCD include results of new analyses and insights for the
ACS and Harvard Six Cities studies, further analyses from the AHSMOG and Veterans
study cohorts, as well as analyses of a Cystic Fibrosis cohort and subsets of the ACS from
Los Angeles and New York City In the original analyses of the Six Cities and ACS cohort
studies, no associations were found between long-term exposure to PM10-2.5 and mortality,
and the extended and followup analyses did not evaluate associations with PM10-2.5. The
historical and more recent results for PM2.5 of both the ACS and the Harvard Six Cities
studies are compiled in Figure 7-6. Moreover, since the last PM AQCD, there is a major new
cohort that investigates the effects of PM2.5on cardiovascular mortality in the literature^
the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study (Miller et al., 2007, 090130). Most recently, an
ecological cohort study of the nation's Medicare population has been completed (Eftim et al.,
2008, 099104). These new findings further strengthen the evidence linking long-term
exposure to PM2.5 and mortality, while providing indications that the magnitude of the
PM2.5 -mortality association is larger than previously estimated (Figure 7-7). Two recent
reports from the AHSMOG and Veterans study cohorts have provided some limited
evidence for associations between long-term exposure to PM10-2.5 and mortality. The original
analyses of the AHSMOG cohort study found positive associations between long-term
July 2009
7-120
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
concentrations of PMio and 15-yr mortality due to natural causes and lung cancer (Abbey et
al., 1999, 047559). McDonnell et al. (2000, 010319) reanalyzed these data and concluded
that previously observed association of long-term ambient PMio concentrations with
mortality for males were best explained by a relationship of mortality with the fine fraction
of PMio rather than the coarse fraction of PMio. Recent reports from the AHSMOG study
cohort, as well as the Nurses' Health Study and a cohort of women in Germany have
provided some evidence for associations between long-term exposure to PMio and mortality
among women.
Harvard Six Cities: A follow-up study has used updated air pollution and mortality
data! an additional 1,368 deaths occurred during the follow-up period (1990-1998) vs. 1,364
deaths in the original study period (1974-1989) (Laden et al., 2006, 087605). Statistically
significant associations are reported between long-term exposure to PM2.5 and mortality for
data for the two periods (RR = 1.16 [95% CP 1.07-1.26] per 10 |u,g/m3 PM2.5). Of special note
is a statistically significant reduction in mortality risk reported with reduced long-term fine
particle concentrations (RR = 0.73 [95% CP 0.57-0.95] per 10 |u,g/m3 PM2.5). This is
equivalent to an RR of 1.27 for reduced mortality risks with reduced long-term PM2.5
concentrations. This reduced mortality risk was observed for deaths due to cardiovascular
and respiratory causes, but not for lung cancer deaths. The PM2.5 concentrations for recent
years were estimated from visibility data, which introduces some uncertainty in the
interpretation of the results from this study. Coupled with the results of the original
analysis (Dockery et al., 1993, 044457), this study strongly suggests that a reduction in fine
PM pollution yields positive health benefits.
ACS Extended Analyses/Reanalysis II: Two new analyses further evaluated the
associations of long-term PM2.5 exposures with risk of mortality in 50 U.S. cities reported by
Pope and colleagues (2002, 024689), adding new details about deaths from specific
cardiovascular and respiratory causes (Krewski, 2009, 190075; Pope CAet al., 2004,
055880). Pope et al. (2004, 055880) reported positive associations with deaths from specific
cardiovascular diseases, particularly ischemic heart disease, and a group of cardiac
conditions including dysrhythmia, heart failure and cardiac arrest (RR for cardiovascular
mortality = 1.12, 95% CI 1.08-1.15 per 10 jug/m3 PM2.5), but no PM associations were found
with respiratory mortality.
In an additional reanalysis that extended the follow-up period for the ACS cohort to
18 years (1982-2000) (Krewski et al., 2009, 191193), investigators found effect estimates
that were similar, though generally higher, than those reported in previous ACS analyses.
This reanalysis also included data for seven ecologic (neighborhood-level) contextual (i.e.,
not individual-level) covariates, each of which represents local factors known or suspected
to influence mortality, such as poverty level, educational attainment, and unemployment.
The effect estimate for all cause mortality, based on PM2.5 concentrations measured in 1999
and 2000 was 1.03 (95% CP 1.01-1.05). The corresponding effect estimates for deaths due to
July 2009
7-121
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
IHD and lung cancer were 1.15 (95% CI: 1.04-1.18) and 1.11 (95% CI: 1.04-1.18),
respectively. In earlier analyses of this cohort, investigators found that increasing education
levels appeared to reduce the effect of PM2.5 exposure on mortality. Results from this
reanalysis show a similar pattern, although with somewhat less certainty, for all causes of
death except IHD, for which the pattern was reversed. Overall, although the addition of
random effects modeling and contextual covariates to the ACS model made most effect
estimates higher (but some lower), they were not statistically different from the earlier ACS
effect CPD=Cardio-Pulmonary Disease! CVD=Cardiovascular Disease! IHD=Ischemic Heart
estimates. Thus, these new analyses, with their more extensive consideration of potentially
confounding factors, confirm the published ACS PJVk.s'mortality results to be robust.
California Cancer Prevention Study: In a cohort of elderly people in 11 California
counties (mean age 73 years in 1983), an association was reported for long-term PM2.5
exposure with all-cause deaths from 1973-1982 (RR = 1.04 [95% CP 1.01-1.07] per 10 |ug/m3
PM2.5) (Enstrom, 2005, 087356). However, no significant associations were reported with
deaths in later time periods when PM2.5 levels had decreased in the most polluted counties
(1983-2002) (RR = 1.00 [95% CP 0.98-1.02] per 10 |ug/m3 PM2.5). The PM2.5 data were
obtained from the EPA's Inhalation Particle Network (collected 1979-1983), and the
locations represented a subset of data used in the 50-city ACS study (Pope CAet al., 1995,
045159). However, the use of average values for California counties as exposure surrogates
likely leads to significant exposure error, as many California counties are large and quite
topographically variable.
July 2009
7-122
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Cohort
Study
Years
Mean
Original
Dockery et al. (1993, 044457)
1974-1991
18.6
i—>
All Cause
Reanalysis
Krewski etal. (2000, 012281)
1974-1991
18.6
Temporal Changes
Villeneuve et al. (2002,042576)
1974-1991
18.6
1 "
Extended
Laden et al. (2006, 087605)
1974-1998
17.6
1 *
6-Cities Medicare
Eftim et al. (2008, 099104)
2000-2002
14.1
1
Original
Pope etal. (1995, 045159)
1982-1989
18.2
]
Reanalysis
Krewski et al.(2000, 012281)
1982-1989
18.2
j "Hh
Extended
Pope et al. (2002, 024689)
1979-1983
21.1
r«-
Extended
Pope et al. (2002, 024689)
1999-2000
140.
!^-
ACS
Intra-metro LA
Jerrett et al. (2005,189405)
1982-2000
19.0
)
ACS Medicare
Eftim et al. (2008, 099104)
2000-2002
13.6
~
Reanalysis II
Krewski et al. (2009,191193)
1982-2000
14.0
Reanalysis II - LA
Krewski et al. (2009,191193)
1982-2000
20.5
i i
Reanalysis II - NYC
Krewski etal. (2009,191193)
1982-2000
128
i
SCS
Original
Dockery etal. (1993, 044457)
1974-1991
18.6
i
i 1
CPD
Reanalysis
Krewski etal. (2000, 012281)
1974-1991
18.6
i —•
t
Original
Pope etal. (1995, 045159)
1982-1989
18.2
i m^mm
Reanalysis
Krewski etal. (2000, 012281)
1982-1989
18.2
Extended
Pope et al. (2002, 024689)
1979-1983
21.1
j™*"*
ACS
Extended
Pope et al. (2002, 024689)
1999-2000
14.0
J—«—
Intra-metro LA
Jerrett etal. (2005,189405)
1982-2000
19.0
* t
Reanalysis II
Krewski et al. (2009,191193)
1982-2000
14.0
Reanalysis II - LA
Krewski et al. (2009,191193)
1982-2000
20.5
Reanalysis II - NYC
Krewski et al. (2009,191193)
1982-2000
KM—•
1—
i
SCS
Extended
Laden et al. (2006, 087605)
1974-1998
17.6
i
i
CVD
arq
Reanalysis
Krewski et al. (2000,012281)
1982-1989
18.2
i
Extended
Pope et al. (2004, 055880)
1982-2000
17.1
i
Extended
Pope et al. (2004, 055880)
1982-2000
17.1
IHD
Intra-metro LA
Jerrett etal. (2005,189405)
1982-2000
19.0
i 9
ACS
Reanalysis II
Krewski et al. (2009,191193)
1982-2000
14.0
Reanalysis II - LA
Krewski et al. (2009,191193)
1982-2000
20.5
Reanalysis II - NYC
Krewski et al. (2009,191193)
1982-2000
12.8
i
Original
Dockery etal. (1993, 044457)
1974-1991
18.6
—1 '
Lung Cancer
SCS
Reanalysis
Krewski etal. (2000, 012281)
1974-1991
18.6
> *
Extended
Laden et al. (2006, 087605)
1974-1998
17.6
1 «
]
Original
Pope et al. (1995, 045159)
1982-1989
18.2
1
Extended
Pope etal. (2002, 024689)
1979-1983
21.1
i i
Extended
Popeet al. (2002, 024689)
1999-2000
14.0
i —i—
AL/O
Intra-metro LA
Jerrett etal. (2005,189405)
1982-2000
19.0
i
Reanalysis II
Krewski et al. (2009,191193)
1982-2000
14.0
J -MR—
Reanalysis II - LA
Krewski et al. (2009,191193)
1982-2000
20.5
J *
Reanalysis II - NYC
Krewski et al. (2009,191193)
1982-2000
m
—* 1
SCS
Extended
Laden et al. (2006, 087605)
1974-1998
17.6
¦—h—
i
Other
Extended
Pope et al. (2002, 024689)
1979-1983
21.1
i
Extended
Pope et al. (2002, 024689)
1999-2000
14.0
Intra-metro LA
Jerrett etal. (2005,189405)
1982-2000
19.0
i
Reanalysis II
Krewski et al. (2009,191193)
1982-2000
14.0
I 1 1
OJ U f,5
Figure 7-6. Mortality risk estimates associated with long-term exposure to PM2.5 from the
Harvard Six Cities Study (SCS) and the American Cancer Society Study (ACS).
July 2009
7-123
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Cohort
Subset
Mean
McDonnell et al. (2000,010319)
AHSMOG
Males
32.0
Brunekreef et al. (2009,191947)
NLCS-AIR
Full Cohort
28.3
Brunekreef et al. (2009,191947)
NLCS-AIR
Case Cohort
28.3
Enstrom (2005, 087356)
CA Cancer Prevention
1973-1982
23.4
Enstrom (2005, 087356)
CA Cancer Prevention
1983-2002
Enstrom (2005, 087356)
CA Cancer Prevention
1973-2002
Jerrett et al. (2005,189405)
ACS-LA
19.0
Krewski et al. (2009,191193)
ACS Reanalvsis II - LA
20.5
Laden et al. (2006, 087605)
Harvard 6-Cities
16.0
Lipfert et al. (2006, 088218)
Veterans Cohort
14.3
Lipfert et al. (2006, 088756)
Veterans Cohort
14.3
Eftim et al. (2008,099104)
Medicare Cohort
ACS Sites
13.6
Eftim et al. (2008,099104)
Medicare Cohort
6-Cities sites
14.1
Krewski et al. (2009,191193)
ACS Reanalvsis II
14.0
Goss et al. (2004, 055624)
U.S. Cvstic Fibrosis
13.7
Zegeret al. (2008,191951)
MCAPS
65+, Eastern
14.0
Zegeret al. (2008,191951)
MCAPS
65+, Central
10.7
Zegeret al. (2008,191951)
MCAPS
65+, Western
13.1
Zegeret al. (2008,191951)
MCAPS
65-74, Eastern
14.0
Zegeret al. (2008,191951)
MCAPS
65-74, Central
10.7
Zegeret al. (2008,191951)
MCAPS
65-74, Western
13.1
Zegeret al. (2008,191951)
MCAPS
65+, Eastern
14.0
Zegeret al. (2008,191951)
MCAPS
75-84, Central
10.7
Zegeret al. (2008,191951)
MCAPS
75-84, Western
13.1
Zegeret al. (2008,191951)
MCAPS
85+, Eastern
14.0
Zegeret al. (2008,191951)
MCAPS
85+, Central
10.7
Zegeret al. (2008,191951)
MCAPS
85+, Western
13.1
Krewski et al. (2009,191193)
ACS Reanalvsis II - NYC
12.8
Brunekreef et al. (2009,191947)
NLCS-AIR
Full Cohort
28.3
Brunekreef et al. (2009, 191947)
NLCS-AIR
Case Cohort
28.3
Pope et al. (2004, 055880)
ACS
17.1
Laden et al. (2006, 087605)
Harvard 6-Cities
16.0
Naess et al. (2007, 090736)
Oslo, Norwav
Men, 51-70 vrs
14.3
Naess et al. (2007,090736)
Oslo, Norwav
Men, 71-90 vrs
14.3
Naess et al. (2007,090736)
Oslo, Norwav
Women, 51-70
14.3
Naess et al. (2007,090736)
Oslo, Norwav
Women 71-90 vrs
14.3
Miller et al. (2007,090130)
WHI
Females
13.5
Chen et al. (2005, 087942)
AHSMOG
Females
29.0
Chen et al. (2005, 087942)
AHSMOG
Males
29.0
Jerrett et al. (2005, 189405)
ACS-LA
19.0
Krewski etal. (2009,190075)
ACS Reanalvsis II - LA
20.5
Pope et al. (2004, 055880)
ACS
17.1
Krewski et al. (2009,191193)
ACS Reanalvsis II
14.0
Krewski et al. (2009,191193)
ACS Reanalvsis II -NYC
12.8
McDonnell etal. (2000,010319)
AHSMOG
Males
32.0
Jerrett et al. (2005,189405)
ACS-LA
19.0
Krewski etal. (2009,191193)
ACS Reanalvsis II - LA
20.5
Krewski etal. (2009,191193)
ACS Reanalvsis II
14.0
Krewski etal. (2009,191193)
ACS Reanalvsis II -NYC
12.8
Brunekreef et al. (2009,191947)
NLCS-AIR
Full Cohort
28.3
Brunekreef et al. (2009, 191947)
NLCS-AIR
Case Cohort
28.3
Laden et al. (2006, 087605)
Harvard 6-Cities
16.0
McDonnell etal. (2000, 010319)
AHSMOG
Males
32.0
Brunekreef et al. (2009,191947)
NLCS-AIR
Full Cohort
28.3
Brunekreef et al. (2009,191947)
NLCS-AIR
Case Cohort
28.3
Jerrett et al. (2005,189405)
ACS-LA
19.0
Krewski etal. (2009, 191193)
ACS Reanalvsis II - LA
20.5
Laden et al. (2006, 087605)
Harvard 6-Cities
16.0
Naess et al. (2007, 090736)
Oslo, Norwav
Men, 51 -70 vrs
14.3
Naess et al. (2007,090736)
Oslo, Norwav
Men, 71 -90 vrs
14.3
Naess et al. (2007,090736)
Oslo, Norwav
Women, 51 -70
14.3
Naess etal. (2007,090736)
Oslo, Norwav
Women 71-90
14.3
Krewski etal. (2009,191193)
ACS Reanalvsis II
14.0
Krewski et al. (2009,191193)
ACS Reanalvsis II -
12.8
Brunekreef et al. (2009,191947)
NLCS-AIR
Full Cohort
28.3
Brunekreef et al. (2009,191947)
NLCS-AIR
Case Cohort
28.3
Jerrett et al. (2005,189405)
ACS-LA
19.0
Laden et al. (2006, 087605)
Harvard 6-Cities
16.0
Krewski etal. (2009,191193)
ACS Reanalvsis II
14.0
CV = Cardiovascular; CHD= Coronary Heart [
lisease; IHD = Ischemic Heart Dise
iase; CPD = Cardio-Pulmonary Disease
All Cause
!~
t
f
+
»
cv
CHD
IHD
CPD
Respiratorv
Lung Cancer
t
[.
[.
» i
i
Other
01 1.0 1.1 21
Figure 7-7. Mortality risk estimates associated with long-term exposure to PM2.5 in recent cohort
studies.
July 2009
7-124
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
AHSMOG: In this analysis for the Seventh-Day Adventist cohort in California, a
positive, statistically significant, association with coronary heart disease mortality was
reported among females (92 deaths! RR = 1.42 [95% CI: 1.06-1.90] per 10 |u,g/m3 PM2.5), but
not among males (53 deaths! RR = 0.90 [95% CI: 0.76-1.05] per 10 |ug/m3 PM2.5) (Chen et al.,
2005, 087942). Associations were strongest in the subset of postmenopausal women (80
deaths! RR = 1.49 [95% CI: 1.17-1.89] per 10 |ug/m3 PM2.5). The authors speculated that
females may be more sensitive to air pollution-related effects, based on differences between
males and females in dosimetry and exposure. As was found with fine particles, a positive
association with coronary heart disease mortality was reported for PM10-25 and PM10 among
females (RR = 1.38 [95% CI: 0.97-1.95] per 10 |ug/m3 PMio-2.5;RR = 1.22 [95% CI: 1.01-1.47]
per 10 |ug/m3 PM10), but not for males (RR = 0.92 [95% CI: 0.66-1.29] per 10 |ug/m3 PM10-2.5;
RR = 0.94 [95% CI: 0.82-1.08] per 10 |ug/m3 PM10); associations were strongest in the subset
of postmenopausal women (80 deaths) (Chen et al., 2005, 087942).
U.S. Cystic Fibrosis cohort: A positive, but not statistically significant, association was
reported for PM2.5 in this cohort (RR = 1.32 [95% CI: 0.91-1.93] per 10 jug/m3 PM2.5) in a
study that primarily focused on evidence of exacerbation of respiratory symptoms (Goss et
al., 2004, 055624). No clear association was reported for PM10. However, only 200 deaths
had occurred in the cohort of over 11,000 people (average age in cohort was 18.4 years), so
the power of this study to detect associations was relatively low.
Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Study: This nationwide cohort study considered 65,893
postmenopausal women with no history of cardiovascular disease who lived in 36 U.S.
metropolitan areas from 1994 to 1998 (Miller et al., 2007, 090130). The study had a median
subject followup time of six years. Miller and colleagues assessed each woman's exposure to
air pollutants using the monitor located nearest to their residence. Hazard ratios were
estimated for the first cardiovascular event, adjusting for age, race or ethnic group,
smoking status, educational level, household income, body-mass index, and presence or
absence of diabetes, hypertension, or hypercholesterolemia. Overall, this study concludes
that "long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution is associated with the incidence of
cardiovascular disease and death among postmenopausal women." In terms of effect size,
the study found that each increase of 10 |ug/m3 of PM2.5 was associated with a 24% increase
in the risk of a cardiovascular event (hazard ratio, 1.24 [95% CI: 1.09-1.41]) and a 76%
increase in the risk of death from cardiovascular disease (hazard ratio, 1.76 [95% CI: 1.25-
2.47]). While this study found results confirmatory to the ACS and Six Cities Study, it
reports much larger relative risk estimates per ug/ma PM2.5. In addition, since the study
included only women without pre-existing cardiovascular disease, it could potentially be a
healthier cohort population than that considered by the ACS and Six Cities Study. Indeed,
the WHI Study reported only 216 cardiovascular deaths in 349,643 women-years of
followup, or a rate of 0.075% deaths per year (Miller et al., 2007, 090130), while the ACS
Study reported that 10% of subjects died of cardiovascular disease over a 16 yr followup
July 2009
7-125
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
period, yielding a rate of 0.625% per year, or approximately 8 times the cardiovascular
mortality rate of the WHI population (Pope CAet al., 2004, 055880). Thus, PM2.5 impacts
may yield higher relative risk estimates in the WHI population because the PM2.5 risk is
being compared to a much lower prevailing risk of cardiovascular death in this select study
population.
The WHI study not only confirms the ACS and Six City Study associations with
mortality in yet another well characterized cohort with detailed individual-level
information, it also has been able to consider the individual medical records of the
thousands of WHI subjects over the period of the study. This has allowed the researchers to
examine not only mortality, but also related morbidity in the form of heart problems
(cardiovascular events) experienced by the subjects during the study. As reported in this
paper, this examination confirmed that there is an increased risk of cardiovascular
morbidity, as well (see Section 7.2.9). These morbidity co-associations with PM2.5 in the
same population lend even greater support to the biological plausibility of the air pollution-
mortality associations found in this study.
Medicare Cohort Studies: Using Medicare data, Eftim and co-authors (2008, 099104)
have assessed the association of PM2.5 with mortality for the same locations included in the
ACS and Six City Study. For these locations, they estimated the chronic effects of PM2.5 on
mortality for the period 2000-2002 using mortality data for cohorts of Medicare participants
and average PM2.5 levels from monitors in the same counties included in the two studies.
Using aggregate counts of mortality by county for three age groups, they estimated
mortality risk associated with air pollution adjusting for age and sex and area-level
covariates (education, income level, poverty, and employment), and controlled for potential
confounding by cigarette smoking by including standardized mortality ratios for lung
cancer and COPD. This study is, therefore, an ecological analysis, similar to past published
cross-sectional analyses, in that area-level covariates (education, income level, poverty, and
employment) are employed as controlling variables, since individual level information is not
available from the Medicare database (other than age and sex), which includes virtually all
Americans aged 65 or greater. Exposures are also ecological in nature, as central site data
are used as indices of exposure. These results indicated that a 10 ug/ma increase in the
yearly average PM2.5 concentration is associated with 10.9% (95% CP 9.0-12.8) and with
20.8% (95% CP 14.8-27.1) increases in all-cause mortality for the ACS and Six Cities Study
counties, respectively. The estimates are somewhat higher than those reported by the
original investigators, and there may be several possible explanations for this apparent
increase, especially that this is an older population than the ACS cohort. Perhaps the most
likely explanation is that the lack of personal confounder information (e.g., past personal
smoking information) led to an insufficient control for the effects of these other variables'
effects on mortality, inflating the pollution effect estimates somewhat, similar to what has
been found in the ACS analyses when only ecological-level control variables were included.
July 2009
7-126
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
The ability of the Eftim et al. (2008, 099104) study results to qualitatively replicate the
original individual-level cohort study (e.g., ACS and Six Cities Study) results suggests that
past ecological cross-sectional mortality study results may also provide useful insights into
the nature of the association, especially when used for consideration of time trends, or for
comparisons of the relative (rather than absolute) sizes of risks between different pollutants
or PM components in health effects associations.
Janes et al. (2007, 090927) use the same nationwide Medicare mortality data to
examine the association between monthly averages of fine particles (PM2.5) over the
preceding 12 months and monthly mortality rates in 113 U.S. counties from 2000 to 2002.
They decompose the association between PM2.5 and mortality into 2 components^ (l) the
association between "national trends" in PM2.5 and mortality! and (2) the association
between "local trends," defined as county-specific deviations from national trends. This
second component is posited to provide evidence as to whether counties having steeper
declines in PM2.5 also have steeper declines in mortality relative to the national trend. They
report that the exposure effect estimates are different at these 2 spatiotemporal scales,
raising concerns about confounding bias in these analyses. The authors assert that the
association between trends in PM2.5 and mortality at the national scale is more likely to be
confounded than is the association between trends in PM2.5 and mortality at the local scale
and, if the association at the national scale is set aside, that there is little evidence of an
association between 12-month exposure to PM2.5 and mortality in this analysis. However, in
response, Pope and Burnett (2007, 090928) point out that such use of long-term time trends
as the primary source of exposure variability has been avoided in most other air pollution
epidemiology studies because of such concerns about potential confounding of such time-
trend associations.
By linking monitoring data to the U.S. Medicare system by county of residence, Zeger
et al. (2007, 157176) analyzed Medicare mortality records, comprising over 20 million
enrollees in the 250 largest counties during 2000-2002. The authors estimated log-linear
regression models having age-specific county level mortality rates as the outcome and, as
the main predictor, the average PM2.5 pollution level in each county during 2000. Area-level
covariates were used to adjust for socio-economic status and smoking. The authors reported
results under several degrees of adjustment for spatial confounding and with stratification
into eastern, central and western U.S. counties. A 10 pg/m3 increase in PM2.5 was associated
with a 7.6% increase in mortality (95% CP 4.4-10.8). When adjusted for spatial
confounding, the estimated log-relative risks dropped by 50%. Zeger et al. (2007, 157176)
found a stronger association in the eastern counties than nationally, with no evidence of an
association in western counties.
In a subsequent report, Zeger et al. (2008, 191951) created a new retrospective cohort,
the Medicare Cohort Air Pollution Study (MCAPS), consisting of 13.2 million persons
residing in 4,568 ZIP codes in urban areas having geographic centroids within 6 miles of a
July 2009
7-127
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
PM2.5 monitor. Using this cohort, they investigated the relationship between 6-yr avg
exposure to PM2.5 and mortaility risk over the period 2000-2005. When divided by region,
the associations between long-term exposure to PM2.5 and mortality for the eastern and
central ZIP codes were qualitatively similar to those reported in the ACS and Six Cities
Study, with 11.4% (95% CP 8.8-14.1) and 20.4% (95% CP 15.0-25.8) increases per 10 |ug/m3
increase in PIVL.r, in the eastern and central regions, respectively. The MCAPS results
included evidence of differing PM2.5 relative risks by age and geographic location, where
risk declines with increasing age category until there is no evidence of an association
among persons > 85 years of age, and there is no evidence of a positive association for the
640 urban ZIP codes in the western region of the U.S.
Using hospital discharge data, Zanobetti et al. (2008, 156177) constructed a cohort of
persons discharged with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using Medicare data
between 1985 and 1999. Positive associations in the survival analyses were reported for
single year and multiple-year lag exposures, with a hazard ratio for total mortality of 1.22
(95% CP 1.17-1.27) per 10 jug/m3 increase in PM10 over the previous 4 years.
Veterans cohort: A recent reanalysis of the Veterans cohort data focused on exposure to
traffic-related air pollution (traffic density based on traffic flow rate data and road segment
length) reported a stronger relationship between mortality with long-term exposure to
traffic than with PM2.5 mass (Lipfert et al., 2006, 088218). A significant association was
reported between total mortality and PM2.5 in single-pollutant models (RR = 1.12 [95% CP
1.04-1.20] per 10 jug/m3 PM2.5). This risk estimate is larger than results reported in a
previous study of this cohort. In multipollutant models including traffic density, the
association with PM2.5 was reduced and lost statistical significance. Traffic emissions
contribute to PM2.5 so it would be expected that the two would be highly correlated, and,
thus, these multipollutant model results should be interpreted with caution. In a
companion study, Lipfert et al. (2006, 088218) used data from EPA's fine particle speciation
network, and reported findings for PM2.5 which were similar to those reported by Lipfert et
al. (2006, 088218). In this study (Lipfert et al., 2006, 088218), a significant association was
reported between long-term exposure to PM10-2.5 and total mortality in a single-pollutant
model (RR = 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.12 per 10 |u,g/m3 PM10-2.5). However, the association became
negative and not statistically significant in a model that included traffic density. As it would
be expected that traffic would contribute to the thoracic coarse particle concentrations, it is
difficult to interpret the results of these multipollutant analyses.
Nurses' Health Study Cohort: The Nurses' Health Study (Puett et al., 2008, 156891) is
an ongoing prospective cohort study examining the relation of chronic PM10 exposures with
all-cause mortality and incident and fatal coronary heart disease consisting of 66,250
female nurses in MSAs in the northeastern region of the U.S. All cause mortality was
statistically significantly associated with average PM10 exposures in the time period 3-48
months preceding death. The association was strongest with average PM10 exposure in the
July 2009
7-128
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
24 months prior to death (hazard ratio 1.16 [95% CP 1.05-1.28]) and weakest with exposure
in the month prior to death (hazard ratio 1.04 [95% CP 0.98-1.11]). The association with
fatal CHD occurred with the greatest magnitude with mean exposure in the 24 months
prior to death (hazard ratio 1.42 [95% CP 1.11-1.81]).
Netherlands Cohort Study (NLCS): The Netherlands Cohort Study (Brunekreef et al.,
2009, 191947) estimates the effects of traffic-related air pollution on cause specific mortality
in a cohort of approximately 120,000 subjects aged 55 to 69 year at enrollment. For a 10
iig/ma increase in PM2.5 concentration, the relative risk for natural-cause mortality in the
full cohort was 1.06 (95% CP 0.97-1.16), similar in magnitude to the results reported by the
ACS. In a case-cohort analysis adjusted for additional potential confounders, there were no
associations between air pollution and mortality.
German Cohort: The North Rhine-Westphalia State Environment Agency (LUANRW)
initiated a cohort of approximately 4,800 women, and assessed whether long-term exposure
to air pollution originating from motorized traffic and industrial sources was associated
with total and cause-specific mortality (Gehring et al., 2006, 089797). They found that
cardiopulmonary mortality was associated with PM10 (RR = 1.52 [95% CP 1.09-2.15] per
10 |ug/m3 PM10).
7.6.2. Composition and Source-Oriented Analyses of PM
As discussed in the 2004 PM AQCD, only a very limited number of the chronic
exposure cohort studies have included direct measurements of chemical-specific PM
constituents other than sulfates, or assessments of source-oriented effects, their analyses.
One exception is the Veterans Cohort Study, which looked at associations with some
constituents, and traffic.
Veterans Cohort: Using data from EPA's fine particle speciation network, Lipfert et al.
(2006, 088756) reported a positive association for mortality with sulfates. Using 2002 data
from the fine particle speciation network, positive associations were found between
mortality and long-term exposures to nitrates, EC, Ni and V, as well as traffic density and
peak ozone concentrations. In multipollutant models, associations with traffic density
remained significant, as did nitrates, Ni and V in some models.
Netherlands Cohort Study: Beelen et al. (2008, 156263) studied the association between
long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution and mortality in a Dutch cohort. They
used data from an ongoing cohort study on diet and cancer with 120,852 subjects who were
followed from 1987 to 1996. Exposure to BS, NO2, SO2, and PM2.5, as well as various
exposure variables related to traffic, were estimated at the home address. Cox analyses
were conducted in the full cohort, adjusting for age, sex, smoking, and area-level
socioeconomic status. Traffic intensity on the nearest road was independently associated
with mortality. Relative risks (95% confidence intervals) for a 10 ug/ma increase in BS
July 2009
7-129
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
concentrations (difference between 5th and 95th percentile) were 1.05 (95% CP 1.00-1.11)
for natural cause, 1.04 (95% CI: 0.95-1.13) for cardiovascular, 1.22 (95% CP 0.99-1.50) for
respiratory, 1.03 (95% CP 0.88-1.20) for lung cancer, and 1.04 (95% CI: 0.97-1.12) for
mortality other than cardiovascular, respiratory, or lung cancer. Results were similar for
NO2 and PM2.5, but no associations were found for SO2. Traffic-related air pollution and
several traffic exposure variables were associated with mortality in the full cohort, although
the relative risks were generally small. Associations between natural-cause and respiratory
mortality were statistically significant for NO2 and BS. These results add to the evidence
that long-term exposure to traffic-related particulate air pollution is associated with
increased mortality.
Given the general dearth of published source-oriented studies of the mortality impacts
of long-term PM exposure components, and given that the recent Medicare Cohort study
now indicates that such ecological cross-sectional studies can be useful for evaluating time
trends and/or comparisons across pollution components, it may well be that examining past
cross-sectional studies comparing source-oriented components of PM may be informative. In
particular, Ozkaynak and Thurston (1987, 072960), utilized the chemical speciation
conducted in the Inhalable Particle (IP) Network to conduct a chemical constituent and
source-oriented evaluation on long-term PM exposure and mortality in the U.S. They
analyzed the 1980 U.S. vital statistics and available ambient air pollution data bases for
sulfates and fine, inhalable, and TSP mass. Using multiple regression analyses, they
conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the association between various particle measures
and total mortality. Results from the various analyses indicated the importance of
considering particle size, composition, and source information in modeling of particle
pollution health effects. Of the independent mortality predictors considered, particle
exposure measures most related to the respirable fraction of the aerosols, such as fine
particles and sulfates, were most consistently and significantly associated with the reported
SMSA-specific total annual mortality rates. On the other hand, particle mass measures
that included thoracic coarse particles (e.g., total suspended particles and inhalable
particles) were often found to be non-significant predictors of total mortality. Furthermore,
based on the application of fine particle source apportionment, particles from industrial
sources and from coal combustion were indicated to be more significant contributors to
human mortality than fine soil-derived particles.
7.6.3. Within-City Effects of PM Exposure
Much of the exposure gradient in the national-scale cohort studies was due to city-to-
city differences in regional air pollution, raising the possibility that some or all of the
original PM-survival associations may have been driven instead by city-to-city differences
July 2009
7-130
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
in some unknown (non-pollution) confounder variable. This has been evaluated by three
recent studies.
ACS, Los Angeles: To investigate this issue, two new analyses using ACS data focused
on neighborhood-to-neighborhood differences in urban air pollutants, using data from 23
PM2.5 monitoring stations in the Los Angeles area, and applying interpolation methods
Jerrett et al. (2005, 189405) or land use regression methods (Krewski et al., 2009, 191193)
to assign exposure levels to study individuals. This resulted in both improved exposure
assessment and an increased focus on local sources of fine particle pollution. Significant
associations between PM2.5 and mortality from all causes and cardiopulmonary diseases
were reported with the magnitude of the relative risks being greater than those reported in
previous assessments. In general, the associations for PM2.5 and mortality using these two
methods for exposure assessment were similar, though the use of land use regression
resulted in somewhat smaller hazard ratios and tighter confidence intervals (see Table 7-9)
This indicates that city-to-city confounding was not the cause of the associations found in
the earlier ACS Cohort studies. This provides evidence that reducing exposure error can
result in stronger associations between PM2.5 and mortality than generally observed in
broader studies having less exposure detail.
Table 7-9:
Comparison of results from ACS intra-urban analysis of Los Angeles and new york city
using kriging or land use regression to estimate exposure
Cause of
Death
Los Angeles:
Hazard Ratio1 and 95% Confidence
Interval Using Kriging2
(Jerrett et al., 2005,189405)
Los Angeles:
Hazard Ratio1 and 95% Confidence
Interval Using Land Use Regression3
(Krewski et al., 2009,191193)
New York City:
Hazard Ratio1 and 95% Confidence
Interval Using Land Use Regression4
(Krewski et al., 2009,191193)
All Cause
1.11 (0.99-1.25)
1.13(1.01-1.25)
0.86 (0.63-1.18)
IHD
1.25(0.99-1.59)
1.26 (1.02-1.56)
1.56 (0.87-2.88)
CPD
1.07 (0.91-1.26)
1.09(0.94-1.26)
0.66 (0.41-1.08)
Lung Cancer
1.20 (0.79-1.82)
1.31 (0.90-1.92)
0.90 (0.29-2.78)
'Hazard ratios presented per 10/yg/m3 increase in PM2.5
2Model included parsimonious contextual covariates
3Model included parsimonious individual level (23) and ecologic (4) covariates
4Model included all 44 individual level and 7 ecologic covariates.
ACS, New York: Krewski et al. (2009, 191193) applied the same techniques used in the
land use regression analysis of Los Angeles to an investigation conducted in New York City.
Annual average concentrations were calculated for each of 62 monitors from 3 years of daily
monitoring data for 1999 through 2001. Those data were combined with land-use data
collected from traffic counting systems, roadway network maps, satellite photos of the study
area, and local government planning and tax-assessment maps to assign estimated
exposures to the ACS participants. The investigators did not observe elevated effect
estimates for all cause, CPD or lung cancer deaths, but IHD did show a positive association
with PM2.5 concentration. The difference between the 90th and 10th percentiles of the
3-yr avg PM2.5 concentration was 1.5 ug/m3 and the difference between the minimum and
July 2009
7-131
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
maximum values of the 3"yr avg PMa.5 concentration was 7.8 ug/nr1. This narrow range in
I'M2.5 exposure contrasts across the New York City metropolitan area may well account for
the inconclusive results in this city specific analysis. Relatively uniform exposures would
reduce the power of the statistical models to detect patterns of mortality relative to
exposure and estimate the association with precision.
WHI Study: This study also investigated the within- vs. between-city effects in its
cities. As shown in Figure 7*8, similar effects for both the within and between-city analyses
demonstrate that this association is not due to some other (non-pollution) confounder
differing between the various cities, strengthening confidence in the overall pollution-effect
estimates.
A Overall Effect
12-i
11-
10-
C Within-City Effect
12-i
11-
10-
B Between-City Effect
12-i
11-
10-
£ S
3 D
0 L.
w re
¦B g
o 0
Q w
w £
3 o
js
O 3
30
linii|ii mini ii|uiii|iuii| niii|uni|iiiii|Ti ni|)ii ii|
Source: Miller et al. (200/, 090130)
Figure 7-8. Plots of the relative risk of death from cardiovascular disease from the Women's Health
Initiative study displaying the between-city and within-city contributions to the overall
association between PM2.5 and cardiovascular mortality windows of exposure-effects.
7.6.4. Effects of Different Long-term Exposure Windows
The delay between changes in exposure and changes in health has important policy
implications. Schwartz et al. (2008, 156963) investigated this issue using an extended
July 2009
7-132
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
followup of the Harvard Six Cities Study. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to
control for smoking, body mass index, and other covariates. Penalized splines were fit in a
flexible functional form to the concentration response to examine its shape, and the degrees
of freedom for the curve were selected based on Akaike's information criterion (AIC). The
researchers also used model averaging as an alternative approach, where multiple models
are fit explicitly and averaged, weighted by their probability of being correct given the data.
The lag relationship by model was averaged across a range of unconstrained distributed lag
models (i.e., same year, year prior, two years prior, etc.). Results of the lag comparison are
shown in Figure 7"9 indicating that the effects of changes in exposure on mortality are seen
within two years. The authors also noted that the concentration-response curve was linear,
clearly continuing below the level of the current U.S. air quality standard of 15 ug/m3.
1.20
ec
.10
> 1.05
cr 1.00
Year before death
Source: Schwartz et al. (2008,156963)
Figure 7-9. The model-averaged estimated effect of a 10-/vg/m3 increase in PM2.5 on all-cause
mortality at different lags (in years) between exposure and death. Each lag is estimated
independently of the others. Also shown are the pointwise 95% CIs for each lag, based
on jacknife estimates.
Similarly, the effect of long-term exposure to PMioon the risk of death in a large
multicity study of elderly subjects discharged alive following an admission for COPD found
the effect was not limited to the exposure in each year of follow-up, and had larger
cumulative effects spread over the follow-up year and 3 preceding years (Zanobetti et al.,
2008, 156177).
Roosli et al. (2005, 156923) took an alternative approach to determining the window
over which the mortality effects of long-term pollution exposures occurred. They fit the
model shown in Figure 7-10 using k = 0.5 based on the Utah Steel Strike (Pope CA, 1989,
044461) and the Ireland coal ban study (Clancy et al., 2002, 035270). They found that
July 2009
7-133
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1 roughly 75% of health benefits are observed in the first 5 years, as shown in Table 7-10.
2 These results are consistent with the findings of Schwartz et al. (2008, 156963). Puett et al.
3 (2008, 156891) also compared different long-term lags, with exposure periods ranging from
4 1 month to 48 months prior to death. They found statistically significant associations with
5 average PMio exposures in the time period 3-48 months prior to death, with the strongest
6 associations in the 24 months prior to death and the weakest with exposure in the 1 month
7 prior to death.
io
O —
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
Time (years)
Source: Roosli et al. (2005,156923)
Figure 7-10. Time course of relative risk of death after a sudden decrease in air pollution exposure
during the year 2000, assuming a steady state model (solid line) and a dynamic model
(bold dashed line). The thin dashed line refers to the reference scenario. Table 7-10.
Distribution
of the effect of a hypothetical reduction of 10 yug/m3 PM10 in 2000 on all-cause mortality
2000-2009 in Switzerland.
Yr
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Proportion of total effect (%)
39.3
23.9
14.5
8.8
5.3
3.2
2.0
1.2
0.7
0.4
Relative risk (per 10/yg/m3 reduction in PMio)
1.0
0.9775
0.9863
0.9917
0.9950
0.9969
0.9981
0.9989
0.9993
0.9996
0.9997
Relative risk and proportion of total effect in each year are shown, assuming a time constant k of 0.5
Source: Roosli et al. (2005,156923)
July 2009
7-134
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
In the reanalysis of the ACS cohort, the investigators calculated time windows of
exposure as average concentrations during successive five-yr periods preceding the date of
death (Krewski et al., 2009, 191193). The investigators considered the time window with
the best-fitting model (judged by the AIC statistic) to be the period during which pollution
had the strongest influence on mortality. Overall, the differences between the time periods
were small and demonstrated no definitive patterns. High correlations between exposure
levels in the three periods may have reduced the ability of this analysis to detect any
differences in the relative importance of the time windows. The investigators did not
analyze any time periods smaller than five years, so the results are not directly comparable
to those reported by Schwartz et al. (2008, 156963), Roosli et al. (2005, 156923), and Puett
et al. (2008, 156891).
Generally, these results indicate a developing coherence of the air pollution mortality
literature, suggesting that the health benefits from reducing air pollution do not require a
long latency period and would be expected within a few years of intervention.
7.6.5. Summary and Causal Determinations
7.6.5.1. PM2.5
In the 1996 PM AQCD (U.S. EPA, 1996, 079380), results were presented for three
prospective cohort studies of adult populations: the Six Cities Study (Dockery et al., 1993,
044457); the American Cancer Society (ACS) Study (Pope CAet al., 1995, 045159); and the
California Seventh Day Adventist (AHSMOG) Study (Abbey et al., 1995, 000669). The 1996
AQCD concluded that the chronic exposure studies, taken together, suggested associations
between increases in mortality and long-term exposure to fine PM, though there was no
evidence to support an association with PM10-2.5 (U.S. EPA, 1996, 079380). Discussions of
mortality and long-term exposure to PM in the 2004 PM AQCD emphasized the results of
four U.S. prospective cohort studies, but the greatest weight was placed on the findings of
the ACS and the Harvard Six Cities studies, which had undergone extensive independent
reanalysis, and which were based on cohorts that were broadly representative of the U.S.
population. Collectively, the 2004 PM AQCD found that these studies provided strong
evidence that long-term exposure to PM2.5 was associated with increased risk of human
mortality.
The recent evidence is largely consistent with past studies, further supporting the
evidence of associations between long-term PM2.5 exposure and increased risk of human
mortality (Section 7.6) in areas with mean concentrations from 13.2 to 29 ug/ma
(Figure 7-7). New evidence from the Six Cities cohort study shows a relatively large risk
estimate for reduced mortality risk with decreases in PM2.5 (Laden et al., 2006, 087605).
The results of new analyses from the Six Cities cohort and the ACS study in Los Angeles
July 2009
7-135
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
suggest that previous and current studies may have underestimated the magnitude of the
association (Jerrett et al., 2005, 189405). With regard to mortality by cause-of-death, recent
ACS analyses indicate that cardiovascular mortality primarily accounts for the total
mortality association with PM2.5 among adults, and not respiratory mortality The recent
WHI cohort study shows even higher cardiovascular risks per pg/m.'i than found in the ACS
study, but this is likely due to the fact that the study included only women without pre-
existing cardiovascular disease (Miller et al., 2007, 090130). There is additional evidence for
an association between PM2.5 exposure and lung cancer mortality (Section7.5.1.l). The WHI
study also considered within vs. between city mortality, as well as morbidity co-associations
with PM2.5 in the same population. The first showed that the results are not due to between
city confounding, and the morbidity analyses show the coherence of the mortality
association across health endpoints, supporting the biological plausibility of the air
pollution-mortality associations found in these studies.
Results from a new study examining the relationship between life expectancy and
PM2.5 and the findings from a multiyear expert judgment study that comprehensively
characterizes the size and uncertainty in estimates of mortality reductions associated with
decreases in PM2.5 in the U.S draw conclusions that are consistent with an association
between long-term exposure to PM2.5 and mortality (Pope et al., 2009, 190107; Roman et
al., 2008, 156921). Pope et al. (2009, 190107) report that a decrease of 10 ug/m in the
concentration of PIVk.sis associated with an estimated increase in mean (± SE) life
expectancy of 0.61 ± 0.20 year. For the approximate period of 1980-2000, the average
increase in life expectancy was 2.72 years among the 211 counties in the analysis. The
authors note that reduced air pollution was only one factor contributing to increased life
expectancies, with its effects overlapping with those of other factors.
Roman et al. (2008, 156921) applied state-of-the-art expert judgment elicitation
techniques to develop probabilistic uncertainty distributions that reflect the broader array
of uncertainties in the concentration-response relationship. This study followed best
standard practices for expert elicitations based on the body of literature accumulated over
the past two decades. The resulting PM2.5 effect estimate distributions, elicited from 12 of
the world's leading experts on this issue, are shown in Figure 7-11. They indicate both
larger central estimates of mortality reductions for decreases in long-term PM2.5 exposure
in the U.S. (averaging almost 1% per pg/m3 PM2.5) than reported (for example) by the ACS
Study (i.e., 0.6% per jug/m3 PM2.5 in Pope et al. (2002, 024689), and a wider distribution of
uncertainty by each expert than provided by any one of the PM2.5 epidemiologic studies.
However, a composite uncertainty range of the overall mean effect estimate (i.e., based
upon all 12 experts' estimates, but not provided in Figure 7-11) would be much narrower,
and closer to that derived from the ACS study than indicated for any one expert shown in
Figure 7-11.
July 2009
7-136
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Group 1
Group 2
s
I
Range of PM2 5 Q -J e 1 1 f f 1 i 1 i \ I 1 i 1 1 ¦ f i
Concentration 4-30 4-10 >10-30 4*10 >10-30 4-30 4-30 4-30 4-16 >16-30 4-7 >7-30 4*30 4-30 4-30 4-30 pope OocKery
Causality Likelihood 99% 75% 99% 98% 98% 95% 95% 70% 35% 35% 100% 100% 99% 99% 95% 90% et al et al,
Expert E L B DIG K F CJAH 2002 1993
Key: Closed circle = median; Open circle = mean; Box = interquartile range; Solid line = 90% credible interval
Source: Roman et al. (2008,156921)
Figure 7-11. Experts' mean effect estimates and uncertainty distributions for the PM2.5 mortality
concentration-response coefficient for a 1 yug/m3 change in annual average PM2.5
Overall, recent evidence supports the strong evidence reported in the 2004 PM AQCD
(EPA, 2004, 056905) that long-term exposure to PM2.5 is associated with an increased risk
of human mortality. When looking at the cause of death, the strongest evidence comes from
mortality due to cardiovascular disease, with additional evidence supporting an association
between PM2.5 and lung cancer mortality (Figure 7-7). Fewer studies evaluate the
respiratory component of cardiopulmonary mortality, and the evidence to support an
association with long-term exposure to PM2.5 and respiratory mortality is weak (Figure 7-7).
Together these findings are consistent and coherent with the evidence from epidemiologic,
controlled human exposure, and animal toxicological studies for the effects of short- and
long-term exposure to PM on cardiovascular effects presented in Sections 6.2 and 7.2,
respectively. Evidence of short- and long-term exposure to PM2.5 and respiratory effects
(Sections 6.3 and 7.3, respectively) and infant mortality (Section 7.4) are coherent with the
weak respiratory mortality effects. Additionally, the evidence for short- and long-term
cardiovascular and respiratory morbidity provides biological plausibility for mortality due
to cardiovascular or respiratory disease. The most recent evidence for the association
between long-term exposure to PM2.5 and mortality is particularly strong for women.
Collectively, the evidence is sufficient to conclude that the relationship between long-term
PM2.5 exposures and mortality is likely to be causal.
July 2009
7-137
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
7.6.5.2. PMio-2.5
1 In the 2004 PM AQCD, results from the ACS and Six Cities study analyses indicated
2 that thoracic coarse particles were not associated with mortality. Evidence is still limited to
3 adequately characterize the association between PM10-2.5 and PM sources and/or
4 components. The new findings from AHSMOG and Veterans cohort studies provide limited
5 evidence of associations between long-term exposure to PM10-2.5 and mortality in areas with
6 mean concentrations from 16 to 25 jug/m3. The evidence for PM 10-2.5 is inadequate to determine
7 if a causal relationship exists between long-term exposures and mortality.
July 2009
7-138
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Chapter 7 References
Abbey DE; Lebowitz MD; Mills PE Petersen FF; Beeson WL; Burchette RJ. (1995). Long-term ambient
concentrations of particulates and oxidants and development of chronic disease in a cohort of nonsmoking
California residents. Presented at In- Phalen, R. F.i Bates, D. V., eds. Proceedings of the colloquium on
particulate air pollution and human mortality and morbidity; January 1994; Irvine, CA. Inhalation
Toxicol. 7: 19-34., Irvine, CA. 000669
Abbey DE; Mills PE Petersen FF; Beeson WL. (1991). Long-term ambient concentrations of total suspended
particulates and oxidants as related to incidence of chronic disease in California Seventh-Day Adventists.
Environ Health Perspect, 94- 43-50. 042668
Abbey DE; Nishino N; McDonnell WF; Burchette RJ; Knutsen SF; Beeson WL; Yang JX. (1999). Long-term
inhalable particles and other air pollutants related to mortality in nonsmokers. Am J Respir Crit Care
Med, 159: 373-382. 047559
Abou Chakra OR; Joyeux M; Nerriere E; Strub MP; Zmirou-Navier D. (2007). Genotoxicity of organic extracts of
urban airborne particulate matter- an assessment within a personal exposure study. Chemosphere, 66-
1375-81. 098819
Achenbach S; Daniel WG. (2001). Noninvasive coronary angiography--an acceptable alternative?. , 345- 1909"
1910. 156189
Ackermann-Liebrich U; Kuna-Dibbert B; Probst-Hensch NM; Schindler C; Dietrich DF; Stutz EZ; Bayer-
Oglesby L; Baum F; Brandli O; Brutsche M; Downs SH; Keidel D; Gerbase MWi Imboden M; Keller R;
Knopfli B; Kunzli Nellweger J-P; Leuenberger P; SALPADIA Team. (2005). Follow-up of the Swiss
Cohort study on air pollution and lung diseases in adults (SAPALDIA 2) 1991-2003- methods and
characterization of participants. Int J Public Health, 50- 245-263. 087826
Ackermann-Liebrich U; Leuenberger P; Schwartz J; Schindler C; Monn C; Bolognini B; Bongard JP; Brandli O;
Domenighetti G; Elsasser S; Grize L; Karrer W; Keller R; Keller-Wossidlo H; Kunzli N; Martin BW;
Medici TC; Pliger B; Wuthrich B; Zellweger JP; Zemp E. (1997). Lung function and long term exposure to
air pollutants in Switzerland. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 155: 122-129. 077537
Agatston AS; Janowitz WR; Hildner FJ; Zusmer NR; Viamonte M Jr; Detrano R. (1990). Quantification of
coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol, 15: 827-832. 156197
Alink GM; Sjogren M; Bos RP; Doekes G; Kromhout H; Scheepers PTJ. (1998). Effect of airborne particles from
selected indoor and outdoor environments on gap-junctional intercellular communication. Toxicol Lett,
96/97: 209-213. 087159
Allen RW; Criqui MH; Diez Roux AV; Allison M; Shea S; Detrano R; Sheppard L; Wong N; Hinckley Stukovsky
K; Kaufman JD. (2009). Fine particulate air pollution, proximity to traffic, and aortic atherosclerosis:
The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Epidemiology, 20: 254-264. 189644
Allison MA; Cheung P; Criqui MH; Langer RD; Wright CM. (2006). Mitral and aortic annular calcification are
highly associated with systemic calcified atherosclerosis. Circulation, 113: 861-866. 155653
Allison MA; Criqui MH; Wright CM. (2004). Patterns and risk factors for systemic calcified atherosclerosis.
Arterioscler Thromb Vase Biol, 24: 331-336. 156210
Amato M; Montorsi P; Ravani A; Oldani E; Galli S; Ravagnani PM; Tremoli E; Baldassarre D. (2007). Carotid
intima-media thickness by B-mode ultrasound as surrogate of coronary atherosclerosis: correlation with
quantitative coronary angiography and coronary intravascular ultrasound findings. Eur Heart J, 28:
2094-2101. 155656
Annesi-Maesano I; Moreau D; Caillaud D; Lavaud F; Le Moullec Y; Taytard A; Pauli G; Charpin D. (2007).
Residential proximity fine particles related to allergic sensitisation and asthma in primary school
children. Respir Med, 10L 1721-1729. 093180
Arad Y; Spadaro LA; Goodman K; Lledo-Perez A; Sherman S; Lerner G; Guerci AD. (1996). Predictive value of
electron beam computed tomography of the coronary arteries. 19-month follow-up of 1173 asymptomatic
subjects. Circulation, 93: 1951-1953. 155661
Araujo JA; Barajas B; Kleinman M; Wang X; Bennett BJ; Gong KW; Navab M; Harkema J; Sioutas C; Lusis AJ;
Nel AE. (2008). Ambient particulate pollutants in the ultrafine range promote early atherosclerosis and
systemic oxidative stress. Circ Res, 102: 589-596. 156222
Note: Hyperlinks to the reference citations throughout this document will take you to the NCEA HERO database (Health and
Environmental Research Online) at http://epa.gov/hero. HERO is a database of scientific literature used by U.S. EPA in the
process of developing science assessments such as the Integrated Science Assessments (ISA) and the Integrated Risk
Information System (IRIS).
July 2009 7-139 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Ardehali R; Nasir Ki Kolandaivelu A; Budoff MJ; Blumenthal RS. (2007). Screening patients for subclinical
atherosclerosis with non-contrast cardiac CT. Atherosclerosis, 192- 235-242. 155662
Arlt VM; Glatt H; Gamboa da Costa G; Reynisson J; Takamura-Enya T; Phillips DH. (2007). Mutagenicity and
DNA adduct formation by the urban air pollutant 2-nitrobenzanthrone. , 98- 445-57. 097257
Auchincloss AH; Roux AV; Dvonch JT; Brown PL; Barr RG; Daviglus ML; Goff DC; Kaufman JD; O'Neill MS.
(2008). Associations between Recent Exposure to Ambient Fine Particulate Matter and Blood Pressure in
the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Environ Health Perspect, 116- 486-491. 156234
Avogbe PH; Ayi-Fanou L; Autrup H; Loft S; Fayomi B; Sanni A; Vinzents P; Moller P. (2005). Ultrafine
particulate matter and high-level benzene urban air pollution in relation to oxidative DNA damage.
Carcinogenesis, 26- 613-620. 087811
Avol EL; Gauderman WJ; Tan SM; London SJ; Peters JM. (2001). Respiratory effects of relocating to areas of
differing air pollution levels. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 164: 2067-2072. 020552
Baccarelli A; Martinelli I; Pegoraro V; Melly S; Grillo P; Zanobetti A; Hou L; Bertazzi PA; Mannucci PM;
Schwartz J. (2009). Living near Major Traffic Roads and Risk of Deep Vein Thrombosis. Circulation, x: x.
188183
Baccarelli A; Martinelli I; Zanobetti A; Grillo P; Hou LF; Bertazzi PA; Mannucci PM; Schwartz J. (2008).
Exposure to Particulate Air Pollution and Risk of Deep Vein Thrombosis. Arch Intern Med, 168; 920-927.
157984
Baccarelli A; Zanobetti A; Martinelli I; Grillo P; Hou L; Giacomini S; Bonzini M; Lanzani G; Mannucci PM;
Bertazzi PA; Schwartz J. (2007). Effects of exposure to air pollution on blood coagulation. J Thromb
Haemost, 5: 252-260. 090733
Baker DG. (1998). Natural pathogens of laboratory mice, rats, and rabbits and their effects on research. Clin
Microbiol Rev, 11: 231-266. 156245
Bao L; Chen S; Wu L; Hei Tom K; Wu Y; Yu Z; Xu A. (2007). Mutagenicity of diesel exhaust particles mediated
by cell-particle interaction in mammalian cells. Toxicol Sci, 229: 91-100. 097258
Basu R; Woodruff TJ; Parker JD; Saulnier L; Schoendorf KC. (2004). Comparing exposure metrics in the
relationship between PM25 and birth weight in California. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 14: 391-396.
087896
Bayer-Oglesby L; Grize L; Gassner M; Takken-Sahli K; Sennhauser FH; Neu U; Schindler C; Braun-Fahrlander
C. (2005). Decline of ambient air pollution levels and improved respiratory health in Swiss children.
Environ Health Perspect, 113: 1632-1637. 086245
Beelen R; Hoek G; van den Brandt PA; Goldbohm RA; Fischer P; Schouten LJ; Armstrong B; Brunekreef B.
(2008). Long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution and lung cancer risk. , 19: 702-710. 155681
Beelen R; Hoek G; van den Brandt PA; Goldbohm RA; Fischer P; Schouten LJ; Jerrett M; Hughes E; Armstrong
B; Brunekreef B. (2008). Long-term effects of traffic-related air pollution on mortality in a Dutch cohort
(NLCS-AIR study). Environ Health Perspect, 116: 196-202. 156263
Beeson WL; Abbey DE; Knutsen SF. (1998). Long-term concentrations of ambient air pollutants and incident
lung cancer in California adults: results from the AHSMOG study. Environ Health Perspect, 106: 813-
823.048890
Bell ML; Ebisu K; Belanger K. (2007). Ambient air pollution and low birth weight in Connecticut and
Massachusetts. Environ Health Perspect, 115: 1118-24. 091059
Bell ML; Kim JY; Dominici F. (2007). Potential confounding of particulate matter on the short-term association
between ozone and mortality in multisite time-series studies. Environ Health Perspect, 115: 1591-1595.
093256
Bhattacharyya N. (2009). Air quality influences the prevalence of hay fever and sinusitis. Laryngoscope, 119:
429-433. 180154
Bigazzi R; Bianchi S; Baldari D; Campese VM. (1998). Microalbuminuria predicts cardiovascular events and
renal insufficiency in patients with essential hypertension. J Hypertens, 16: 1325-1333. 156272
Binkova B; Cerna M; Pastorkova A; Jeli'nek R; Benes I; Novak J; Sram RJ. (2003). Biological activities of
organic compounds adsorbed onto ambient air particles: comparison between the cities of Teplice and
Prague during the summer and winter seasons 2000—2001. , 525: 43"59. 156274
Bobak M. (2000). Outdoor air pollution, low birth weight, and prematurity. Environ Health Perspect, 108: 173-
176. 011448
Bobak M; Leon DA. (1992). Air pollution and infant mortality in the Czech Republic, 1986-1988. Lancet, 8826:
1010-1014. 044415
Bobak M; Leon DA. (1999). The effect of air pollution on infant mortality appears specific for respiratory causes
in the postneonatal period. , 10: 666-670. 007678
July 2009
7-140
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Bonner MR; Han D; Nie J; Rogerson P; Vena JE; Muti P; Trevisan M; Edge SB; Freudenheim JL. (2005). Breast
cancer risk and exposure in early life to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons using total suspended
particulates as a proxy measure. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 14- 53-60. 088993
Bracken MB; Triche EW; Belanger K; Saftlas A; Beckett WS; Leaderer BP. (2003). Asthma symptoms, severity,
and drug therapy- a prospective study of effects on 2205 pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol, 102- 739-753.
156288
Brauer M; Gehring U; Brunekreef B; De Jongste J; Gerritsen J; Rovers M; Wichmann H"E; Wijga A; Heinrich J.
(2006). Traffic-related air pollution and otitis media. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 1414-1418. 090757
Brauer M; Hoek G; Smit HA; De Jongste JC; Gerritsen J; Postma DS; Kerkhof M; Brunekreef B. (2007). Air
pollution and development of asthma, allergy and infections in a birth cohort. Eur Respir J, 29: 879-888.
090691
Brauer M; Hoek G; Van Vliet P; Meliefste K; Fischer PH; Wijga A; Koopman LP; Neijens HJ; Gerritsen J;
Kerkhof M; Heinrich J; Bellander T; Brunekreef B. (2002). Air pollution from traffic and the development
of respiratory infections and asthmatic and allergic symptoms in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med,
166: 1092-1098. 035192
Brauer M; Lencar C; Tamburic L; Koehoorn M; Demers P; Karr C. (2008). A cohort study of traffic-related air
pollution impacts on birth outcomes. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 680-686. 156292
Brown JS; Zeman KL; Bennett WD. (2001). Regional deposition of coarse particles and ventilation distribution
in healthy subjects and patients with cystic fibrosis. , 14: 443-454. 012307
Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett
M; van den Brandt P. (2009). Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory
and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: The NLCS-AIR Study. Health Effects Institute. Boston,
MA. 139. 191947
Budoff MJ; Takasu J; Katz R; Mao S; Shavelle DM; O'Brien KD; Blumenthal RS; Carr JJ; Kronmal R. (2005).
Reproducibility of CT measurements of aortic valve calcification, mitral annulus calcification, and aortic
wall calcification in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Acad Radiol, 13: 166-172. 192105
Bunger J; Krahl J; Weigel A; Schroder O; Bruning T; Muller M; Hallier E; Westphal G. (2006). Influence of fuel
properties, nitrogen oxides, and exhaust treatment by an oxidation catalytic converter on the
mutagenicity of diesel engine emissions. Arch Toxicol, 80: 540-546. 156303
Bunger J; Schappler-Scheele B; Hilgers R; Hallier E. (2007). A 5-year follow-up study on respiratory disorders
and lung function in workers exposed to organic dust from composting plants. Int Arch Occup Environ
Health, 80: 306-312. 156304
Burchiel SW; Lauer FT; Dunaway SL; Zawadzki J; McDonald JD; Reed MD. (2005). Hardwood smoke alters
murine splenic T cell responses to mitogens following a 6-month whole body inhalation exposure. Toxicol
Appl Pharmacol, 202: 229-236. 088090
Burchiel SW; Lauer FT; McDonald JD; Reed MD. (2004). Systemic immunotoxicity in AJ mice following 6"
month whole body inhalation exposure to diesel exhaust. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 196: 337-345. 055557
Calderon-Garciduenas L; Vincent R; Mora-Tiscareno A; Franco-Lira M; Henriquez-Roldan C; Barragan-Mejia G;
Garrido-Garcia L; Camacho-Reyes L; Valencia-Salazar G; Paredes R; Romero L; Osnaya H; Villarreal"
Calderon R; Torres-Jardon. (2007). Elevated plasma endothelin-1 and pulmonary arterial pressure in
children exposed to air pollution. Environ Health Perspect, 115: 1248-1253. 091252
Chambless LE; Heiss G; Folsom AR; Rosamond W; Szklo M; Sharrett AR; Clegg LX. (1997). Association of
coronary heart disease incidence with carotid arterial wall thickness and major risk factors: the
Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, 1987-1993. Am J Epidemiol, 146: 483-494. 156329
Chang J; Delfino RJ; Gillen D; Tjoa T; Nickerson B; Cooper D. (2008). Repeated respiratory hospital encounters
among children with asthma and residential proximity to traffic. J Occup Environ Med, 66: 90-98.
180393
Chen JC; Schwartz J. (2008). Metabolic syndrome and inflammatory responses to long-term particulate air
pollutants. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 612-617. 190106
Chen L; Yang W', Jennison BL; Goodrich A; Omaye ST. (2002). Air pollution and birth weight in northern
Nevada, 1991-1999. Inhal Toxicol, 14: 141-157. 024945
Chen LC; Hwang JS. (2005). Effects of subchronic exposures to concentrated ambient particles (CAPs) in mice
IV Characterization of acute and chronic effects of ambient air fine particulate matter exposures on
heart-rate variability. Inhal Toxicol, 17: 209-216. 087218
Chen LC; Nadziejko C. (2005). Effects of subchronic exposures to concentrated ambient particles (CAPs) in mice
V CAPs exacerbate aortic plaque development in hyperlipidemic mice. Inhal Toxicol, 17: 217-224. 087219
Chen LH; Knutsen SF; Shavlik D; Beeson WL; Petersen F; Ghamsary M; Abbey D. (2005). The association
between fatal coronary heart disease and ambient particulate air pollution: Are females at greater risk?.
Environ Health Perspect, 113: 1723-1729. 087942
July 2009
7-141
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Churg A; Brauer Mi del Carmen Avila-Casado Mi Fortoul Tli Wright JL. (2003). Chronic exposure to high levels
of particulate air pollution and small airway remodeling. Environ Health Perspect, 111- 714-718. 087899
Clancy Li Goodman Pi Sinclair Hi Dockery DW. (2002). Effect of air pollution control on death rates in Dublin,
Ireland- an intervention study. Lancet, 360- 1210-1214. 035270
Claxton LDi Matthews PPi Warren SH. (2004). The genotoxicity of ambient outdoor air, a review- Salmonella
mutagenicity. DNA Repair (Amst), 567- 347-399. 089008
Claxton LDi Woodall GM Jr. (2007). A review of the mutagenicity and rodent carcinogenicity of ambient air. ,
636: 36-94. 180391
Clifton VL; Giles WB; Smith R; Bisits AT; Hempenstall PA; Kessell CG; Gibson PG. (2001). Alterations of
placental vascular function in asthmatic pregnancies. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 164: 546-554. 156360
Craven TE; Ryu JE; Espeland MA; Kahl FR; McKinney WM; Toole JE; McMahan MR; Thompson CJ; Heiss G;
Crouse JR, 3rd. (1990). Evaluation of the associations between carotid artery atherosclerosis and
coronary artery stenosis. A case-control study. , 82: 1230-1242. 155740
Cury PM; Lichtenfels AJ; Reymao MS; Conceicjao GM; Capelozzi VL; Saldiva PH. (2000). Urban levels of air
pollution modifies the progression of urethane-induced lung tumours in mice. Pathol Res Pract, 196: 627"
633. 192100
Dales R; Burnett RT; Smith-Doiron M; Stieb DM; Brook JR. (2004). Air pollution and sudden infant death
syndrome. , 113: 628-631. 087342
Dales R; Wheeler A; Mahmud M; Frescura AM; Smith-Doiron M; Nethery E; Liu L. (2008). The Influence of
Living Near Roadways on Spirometry and Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Elementary Schoolchildren. Environ
Health Perspect, 116: 1423. 156378
Danielsen PH; Loft S; Moller P. (2008). DNA damage and cytotoxicity in type II lung epithelial (A549) cell
cultures after exposure to diesel exhaust and urban street particles. Part Fibre Toxicol, 5- 6. 192092
De Kok TM; Hogervorst JG; Briede JJ; Van Herwijnen MH! Maas LM; Moonen EJ; Driece HA; Kleinjans JC.
(2005). Genotoxicity and physicochemical characteristics of traffic-related ambient particulate matter.
Environ Mol Mutagen, 46: 71-80. 088656
Deckert T; Yokoyama H; Mathiesen E; Ronn B; Jensen T; Feldt-Rasmussen B; Borch-Johnsen K; Jensen JS.
(1996). Cohort study of predictive value of urinary albumin excretion for atherosclerotic vascular disease
in patients with insulin dependent diabetes. Br Med J, 312: 871-874. 156389
DeMarini DM; Brooks LR; Warren SH; Kobayashi T; Gilmour MI; Singh P. (2004). Bioassay-directed
fractionation and Salmonella mutagenicity of automobile and forklift diesel exhaust particles. Environ
Health Perspect, 112: 814-819. 066329
Diez Roux AV; Auchincloss AH; Franklin TG; Raghunathan T; Barr RG; Kaufman J; Astor B; Keeler J. (2008).
Long-term exposure to ambient particulate matter and prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis in the
Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Am J Epidemiol, 167: 667-675. 156401
Dinneen SF; Gerstein HC. (1997). The association of microalbuminuria and mortality in non-insulin-dependent
diabetes mellitus. A systematic overview of the literature. , 157: 1413-1418. 156403
Dockery DW; Cunningham J; Damokosh AI; Neas LM; Spengler JD; Koutrakis P; Ware JH; Raizenne M;
Speizer FE. (1996). Health effects of acid aerosols on North American children: respiratory symptoms.
Environ Health Perspect, 104: 500-505. 077269
Dockery DW; Pope CA III; Xu X; Spengler JD; Ware JH; Fay ME; Ferris BG Jr; Speizer FE. (1993). An
association between air pollution and mortality in six US cities. , 329: 1753-1759. 044457
Downs SH; Schindler C; Liu L-JS; Keidel D; Bayer-Oglesby L; Brutsche MH; Gerbase MWi Keller R; Kunzli N;
Leuenberger P; Probst-Hensch NM; Tschopp J-M; Zellweger J-P; Rochat T; Schwartz J; Ackermann-
Liebrich U;. (2007). Reduced exposure to PM10 and attenuated age-related decline in lung function. , 15:
185-204. 092853
Dugandzic RDodds L; Stieb D; Smith-Doiron M. (2006). The association between low level exposures to ambient
air pollution and term low birth weight: a retrospective cohort study. , 5- 3. 088681
Eftim SE; Samet JM; Janes H; McDermott A; Dominici F. (2008). Fine Particulate Matter and Mortality: A
Comparison of the Six Cities and American Cancer Society Cohorts With a Medicare Cohort. , 19: 209"
216. 099104
Enstrom JE. (2005). Fine particulate air pollution and total mortality among elderly Californians, 1973-2002.
Inhal Toxicol, 17: 803-816. 087356
Erbel R; Mohlenkamp S; Kerkhoff G; Budde T; Schmermund A. (2007). Non-invasive screening for coronary
artery disease: calcium scoring. Heart, 93: 1620-1629. 155768
Erdinger L; Durr M; Hopker KA. (2005). Correlations between mutagenic activity of organic extracts of airborne
particulate matter, NOx and sulphur dioxide in southern Germany: results of a two-year study. Environ
Sci Pollut Res Int, 12: 10-20. 156423
July 2009
7-142
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Fedulov AV; Leme A; Yang Z; Dahl M> Lim R; Mariani TJ; Kobzik L. (2008). Pulmonary exposure to particles
during pregnancy causes increased neonatal asthma susceptibility. , 38- 57"67. 097482
Finch GL; Hobbs CH; Blair LF; Barr EB; Hahn FF; Jaramillo RJ; Kubatko JE; March TH; White RE Krone JR;
Menache MG; Nikula KJ; Mauderly JL; Van Gerpen J; Merceica MD! Zielinska B; Stankowski L; Burling
K; Howell S> Mauderly JL. (2002). Effects of subchronic inhalation exposure of rats to emissions from a
diesel engine burning soybean oil-derived biodiesel fuel. Inhal Toxicol, 14- 1017-1048. 054603
Floyd HS; Chen LC; Vallanat B; Dreher K. (2009). Fine ambient air particulate matter exposure induces
molecular alterations associated with vascular disease progression within plaques of atherosclerotic
susceptible mice. Inhal Toxicol, 21: 394-403. 190350
Forbes LJ; Patel MDi Rudnicka AR; Cook DG; Bush Ti Stedman JR; Whincup PH; Strachan DP; Anderson RH.
(2009). Chronic exposure to outdoor air pollution and markers of systemic inflammation. Epidemiology,
20: 245-253. 190351
Forman JP; Brenner BM. (2006). 'Hypertension' and 'microalbuminuria': the bell tolls for thee. Kidney Int, 69:
22-28. 156439
Foster PMD; Mylchreest E; Gaido KW; Sar M. (2001). Effects of phthalate esters on the developing reproductive
tract of male rats. Hum Reprod Update, 7: 231-235. 156442
Foster PMD; Thomas LV; Cook MWi Gangolli SD. (1980). Study of the testicular effects and changes in zinc
excretion produced by some n-alkyl phthalates in the rat. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 54: 392-398. 094701
Franklin SS; Sutton-Tyrrell K; Belle SH; Weber MA; Kuller LH. (1997). The importance of pulsatile components
of hypertension in predicting carotid stenosis in older adults. J Hypertens, 15: 1143-1150. 156446
Fryer ME; Collins CD. (2003). Model intercomparison for the uptake of organic chemicals by plants. Environ Sci
Technol, 37: 1617-1624. 156454
Fujimoto A; Tsukue N; Watanabe M; Sugawara I; Yanagisawa R; Takano H; Yoshida S; Takeda K. (2005).
Diesel exhaust affects immunological action in the placentas of mice. , 20: 431-440. 096556
Gardner MB. (1966). Biological effects of urban air pollution III Lung tumors in mice. Arch Environ Occup
Health, 12: 305-313. 015129
Gardner MB; Loosli CG; Hanes B; Blackmore W', Teebken D. (1969). Histopathologic findings in rats exposed to
ambient and filtered air. Arch Environ Occup Health, 19: 637-647. 015130
Gauderman WJ; Avol E; Gilliland F; Vora H; Thomas D; Berhane K; McConnell R; Kuenzli N; Lurmann F;
Rappaport E; Margolis H; Bates D; Peters J. (2004). The effect of air pollution on lung development from
10 to 18 years of age. , 351: 1057-1067. 056569
Gauderman WJ; Gilliland GF; Vora H; Avol E; Stram D; McConnell R; Thomas D; Lurmann F; Margolis HG;
Rappaport EB; Berhane K; Peters JM. (2002). Association between air pollution and lung function
growth in southern California children: results from a second cohort. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 166:
76-84. 026013
Gauderman WJ; McConnell R; Gilliland F; London S; Thomas D; Avol E; Vora H; Berhane K; Rappaport EB;
Lurmann F; Margolis HG; Peters J. (2000). Association between air pollution and lung function growth in
southern California children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 162: 1383-1390. 012531
Gehrig R; Buchmann B. (2003). Characterising seasonal variations and spatial distribution of ambient PM10
and PM25 concentrations based on long-term Swiss monitoring data. Atmos Environ, 37: 2571-2580.
139678
Gehring U; Heinrich J; Kramer U; Grote V; Hochadel M; Sugiri D; Kraft M; Rauchfuss K; Eberwein HG;
Wichmann H"E. (2006). Long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and cardiopulmonary mortality in
women. , 17: 545-551. 089797
Geroulakos G; O'Gorman DJ; Kalodiki E; Sheridan DJ; Nicolaides AN. (1994). The carotid intima-media
thickness as a marker of the presence of severe symptomatic coronary artery disease. , 15: 781-785.
155788
Gerstein HC; Mann JF; Yi Q; Zinman B; Dinneen SF; Hoogwerf B; Halle JP; Young J; Rashkow A; Joyce C;
Nawaz S; Yusuf S. (2001). Albuminuria and risk of cardiovascular events, death, and heart failure in
diabetic and nondiabetic individuals. JAMA, 286: 421-426. 156466
Ghosh R; Rankin J; Pless-Mulloli T; Glinianaia S. (2007). Does the effect of air pollution on pregnancy outcomes
differ by gender? A systematic review. Environ Res, 105: 400-408. 091233
Gilboa SM; Mendola P; Olshan AF; Langlois PH; Savitz DA; Loomis D; Herring AH; Fixler DE. (2005). Relation
between ambient air quality and selected birth defects, seven county study, Texas, 1997-2000. Am J
Epidemiol, 162: 238-252. 087892
Girerd X; Mourad JJ; Acar C; Heudes D; Chiche S; Bruneval P; Mignot JP; Billaud E; Safar M; Laurent S.
(1994). Noninvasive measurement of medium-sized artery intima-media thickness in humans: in vitro
validation. J Vase Res, 31: 114-120. 156474
July 2009
7-143
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Glinianaia FV; Rankin J; Bell R; Pless-Mulloli Ti Howel D. (2004). Does particulate air pollution contribute to
infant death? A systematic review. Environ Health Perspect, 112- 1365-1371. 087898
Goss CH; Newsom SA; Schildcrout JS; Sheppard L; Kaufman JD. (2004). Effect of ambient air pollution on
pulmonary exacerbations and lung function in cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 169- 816-821.
055624
Gotschi T> Heinrich J; Sunyer J; Kunzli N. (2008). Long-term effects of ambient air pollution on lung function -
A review. , 19: 690-701. 156485
Gotschi Ti Sunyer J; Chinn Si de Marco Ri Forsberg Bi Gauderman JWi Garcia-Esteban Ri Heinrich Ji
Jacquemin Bi Jarvis Di Ponzio Mi Villani Si Kunzli N. (2008). Air pollution and lung function in the
European Community Respiratory Health Survey. Int J Epidemiol, 37: 1349-1358. 180364
Gottipolu RRi Wallenborn JGi Karoly ED; Schladweiler MC; Ledbetter AD; Krantz T; Linak WP; Nyska A;
Johnson JA; Thomas R; Richards JE; Jaskot RH; Kodavanti UP. (2009). One-month diesel exhaust
inhalation produces hypertensive gene expression pattern in healthy rats. Environ Health Perspect, 117:
38-46. 190360
Gouveia N> Bremner SA; Novaes HMD. (2004). Association between ambient air pollution and birth weight in
Sao Paulo, Brazil. J Epidemiol Community Health, 58: 11-17. 055613
Greenland P; Kizilbash MA. (2005). Coronary computed tomography in coronary risk assessment. , 25: 3-10.
156496
Grigg J; Kulkarni N; Pierse N; Rushton L; O'Callaghan C; Rutman A. (2008). Black-pigmented material in
airway macrophages from healthy children: association with lung function and modeled PM10. 156499
Gunnison A; Chen LC. (2005). Effects of subchronic exposures to concentrated ambient particles (CAPs) in mice
VI Gene expression in heart and lung tissue. Inhal Toxicol, 17: 225-233. 087956
Gutierrez-Castillo ME; Roubicek DA; Cebrian-Garcia ME; De Vizcaya-Ruiz A; Sordo-Cedeno M; Ostrosky-
Wegman P. (2006). Effect of chemical composition on the induction of DNA damage by urban airborne
particulate matter. Environ Mol Mutagen, 47: 199-211. 089030
Gabelova A; Valovicova Z; Bacova G; Labaj J; Binkova B; Topinka J; Sevastyanova O; Sram RJ; Kalina I;
Habalova V; Popov TA; Panev T; Farmer PB. (2007). Sensitivity of different endpoints for in vitro
measurement of genotoxicity of extractable organic matter associated with ambient airborne particles
(PM10). , 620: 103-113. 156458
Gabelova A; Valovicova Z; Labaj J; Bacova G; Binkova B; Farmer Peter B. (2007). Assessment of oxidative DNA
damage formation by organic complex mixtures from airborne particles PM(10). , 620: 135-144. 156457
Ha E-H; Lee J-T; Kim H; Hong Y-C; Lee. (2003). Infant susceptibility of mortality to air pollution in Seoul,
South Korea. , 111: 284-290. 042552
Haland G; Carlsen KC; Sandvik L; Devulapalli CS; Munthe-Kaas MC; Pettersen M; Carlsen KH. (2006).
Reduced lung function at birth and the risk of asthma at 10 years of age. , 355: 1682-1689. 156511
Hamada K; Suzaki Y; Leme A; Ito T; Miyamoto K; Kobzik L; Kimura H. (2007). Exposure of pregnant mice to an
air pollutant aerosol increases asthma susceptibility in offspring. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 70: 688"
695. 091235
Hannigan MP; Cass GR; Penman BW; Crespi CL; Lafleur AL; Busby WF Jr; Thilly WG. (1997). Human cell
mutagens in Los Angeles air. Environ Sci Technol, 31: 438-447. 083598
Hansen C; Neller A; Williams G; Simpson R. (2006). Maternal exposure to low levels of ambient air pollution
and preterm birth in Brisbane, Australia. BJOG, 113: 935-941. 089818
Hansen C; Neller A; Williams G; Simpson R. (2007). Low levels of ambient air pollution during pregnancy and
fetal growth among term neonates in Brisbane, Australia. Environ Res, 103: 383-389. 090703
Harrod KS; Jaramillo RJ; Berger JA; Gigliotti AP; Seilkop SK; Reed MD. (2005). Inhaled diesel engine
emissions reduce bacterial clearance and exacerbate lung disease to Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in
vivo. Toxicol Sci, 83: 155-165. 088144
Hashimoto AH; Amanuma K; Hiyoshi K; Sugawara Y; Goto S; Yanagisawa R; Takano H; Masumura K"L Nohmi
T; Aoki Y. (2007). Mutations in the lungs of gpt delta transgenic mice following inhalation of diesel
exhaust. , 48: 682-693. 097261
Healey K; Smith EC; Wild CP; Routledge MN. (2006). The mutagenicity of urban particulate matter in an
enzyme free system is associated with the generation of reactive oxygen species. , 602: 1-6. 156532
Heinrich J; Hoelscher B; Frye C; Meyer I; Pitz M; Cyrys J; Wjst M; Neas L; Wichmann H"E. (2002). Improved
air quality in reunified Germany and decreases in respiratory symptoms. , 13: 394-401. 034825
Heinrich J; Slama R. (2007). Fine particles, a major threat to children. Int J Hyg Environ Health, 210: 617-622.
156534
Heiss G; Sharrett AR; Barnes R; Chambless LE; Szklo M; Alzola C. (1991). Carotid atherosclerosis measured by
B-mode ultrasound in populations: associations with cardiovascular risk factors in the ARIC study. Am J
Epidemiol, 134: 250-256. 156535
July 2009
7-144
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Hiramatsu Ki Azuma A; Kudoh Si Desaki Mi Takizawa Hi Sugawara I. (2003). Inhalation of diesel exhaust for
three months affects major cytokine expression and induces bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue
formation in murine lungs. , 29- 607-622. 155846
Hirose Ti Morito Ki Kizu Ri Toriba Ai Hayakawa Ki Ogawa Si Inoue Si Muramatsu Mi Masamune Y. (2001).
Estrogenic/Antiestrogenic Activities of Benzo [a] pyrene Monohydroxy Derivatives. Eisei Kagaku, 47-
552-558. 156548
Hoek Gi Brunekreef Bi Goldbohm Si Fischer Pi Van den Brandt PA. (2002). Association between mortality and
indicators of traffic-related air pollution in the Netherlands' a cohort study. Lancet, 360- 1203-1209.
042364
Hoffmann Bi Moebus Si Kroger Ki Stang Ai Mohlenkamp Si Dragano Ni Schmermund Ai Memmesheimer Mi
Erbel Ri Jockel K"H. (2009). Residential exposure to urban pollution, ankle "brachial index, and
peripheral arterial disease. Epidemiology, 20- 280-288. 190376
Hoffmann Bi Moebus Si Mohlenkamp Si Stang Ai Lehmann Ni Dragano Ni Schmermund Ai Memmesheimer Mi
Mann Ki Erbel Ri Jockel K"Hi Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study Investigative Group. (2007). Residential
exposure to traffic is associated with coronary atherosclerosis. Circulation, 116- 489-496. 091163
Hoffmann Bi Moebus Si Stang Ai Beck E"Mi Dragano Ni Mohlenkamp Si Schmermund Ai Memmesheimer Mi
Mann Ki Erbel Ri Jockel K"Hi Heinz Nixdorf RECALL Study Investigative Group. (2006). Residence
close to high traffic and prevalence of coronary heart disease. Eur Heart J, 27- 2696-2702. 091162
Hoffmann MHi Shi Hi Schmitz BLi Schmid FTi Lieberknecht Mi Schulze Ri Ludwig Bi Kroschel Ui Jahnke Ni
Haerer Wi Brambs HJi Aschoff AJ. (2005). Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed
tomography. JAMA, 293: 2471-2478. 156556
Hollander Mi Hak AEi Koudstaal PJi Bots MLi Grobbee DEi Hofman Ai Witteman JCi Breteler MM. (2003).
Comparison between measures of atherosclerosis and risk of stroke: the Rotterdam Study. , 34: 2367"
2372.156562
Hornberg Ci Maciuleviciute Li Seemayer NH. (1996). Sister chromatid exchanges in rodent tracheal epithelium
exposed in vitro to environmental pollutants. Toxicol Lett, 88: 45"53. 087164
Hornberg Ci Maciuleviciute Li Seemayer NHi Kainka E. (1998). Induction of sister chromatid exchanges (SCE)
in human tracheal epithelial cells by the fractions PM-10 and PM-2.5 of airborne particulates. Toxicol
Lett, 96: 215-220. 155849
Hougaard KSi Jensen KAi Nordly Pi Taxvig Ci Vogel Ui Saber ATi Wallin H. (2008). Effects of prenatal
exposure to diesel exhaust particles on postnatal development, behavior, genotoxicity and inflammation
in mice. Part Fibre Toxicol, 5: 3. 156570
Huang JYi Liao JWi Liu YCi Lu SYi Chou CPi Chan WHi Chen SUi Ueng TH. (2008). Motorcycle exhaust
induces reproductive toxicity and testicular interleukin-6 in male rats. Toxicol Sci, 103: 137-148. 156574
Huynh Mi Woodruff TJi Parker JDi Schoendorf KC. (2006). Relationships between air pollution and preterm
birth in California. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 20: 454-461. 091240
Hwang B-Fi Jaakkola JJKi Lee Y"Li Lin Y"Ci Guo Y-LL. (2006). Relation between air pollution and allergic
rhinitis in Taiwanese schoolchildren. Respir Res, T- 23. 088971
Hwang J-Si Nadziejko Ci Chen LC. (2005). Effects of subchronic exposures to concentrated ambient particles
(CAPs) in mice: HI Acute and chronic effects of CAPs on heart rate, heart-rate fluctuation, and body
temperature. Inhal Toxicol, 17: 199-207. 087957
IARC. (1989). Diesel and gasoline engine exhausts. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer.
002958
Iba MMi Fung Ji Chung Li Zhao Ji Winnik Bi Buckley BTi Chen LCi Zelikoff JTi Kou YR. (2006). Differential
inducibility of rat pulmonary CYP1A1 by cigarette smoke and wood smoke. , 606: 1-11. 156582
Ichinose Ti Yajima Yi Nagashima Mi Takenoshita Si Nagamachi Yi Sagai M. (1997). Lung carcinogenesis and
formation of 8-hydroxy-deoxyguanosine in mice by diesel exhaust particles. Carcinogenesis, 18: 185-192.
053264
Ishihara Yi Kagawa J. (2003). Chronic diesel exhaust exposures of rats demonstrate concentration and time-
dependent effects on pulmonary inflammation. , 15: 473-492. 096404
Islam Ti Gauderman WJ; Berhane K; McConnell R; Avol Ei Peters JM; Gilliland FD. (2007). The relationship
between air pollution, lung function and asthma in adolescents. Thorax, 62: 957-963. 090697
Izawa Hi Watanabe Gi Taya Ki Sagai M. (2007). Inhibitory effects of foods and polyphenols on activation of aryl
hydrocarbon receptor induced by diesel exhaust particles. , 14: 149-156. 190387
Jacobsen NRi Mrller Pi Cohn CAi Loft Si Vogel Ui Wallin H. (2008). Diesel exhaust particles are mutagenic in
FEl-Muta™ Mouse lung epithelial cells. , 641: 54-57. 156597
Jalaludin Bi Mannes Ti Morgan Gi Lincoln Di Sheppeard Vi Corbett S. (2007). Impact of ambient air pollution
on gestational age is modified by season in Sydney, Australia. , 6: 16. 156601
July 2009
7-145
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Janes H; Dominici Fi Zeger SL. (2007). Trends in air pollution and mortality- an approach to the assessment of
unmeasured confounding. , 18: 416-23. 090927
Janssen NAH; Brunekreef B; van Vliet P; Aarts F; Maliefste E Harssema H; Fischer P. (2003). The relationship
between air pollution from heavy traffic and allergic sensitization, bronchial byperresponsiveness, and
respiratory symptoms in Dutch schoolchildren. , 111: 1512-1518. 133555
Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Pope 3rd CA; Krewski D; Newbold KB; Thurston G; Shi Y; Finkelstein N; Calle
EE; Thun MJ. (2005). Spatial analysis of air pollution and mortality in Los Angeles. Epidemiology, 16:
727-36. 189405
Jerrett M; Buzzelli M; Burnett RT; DeLuca PF. (2005). Particulate air pollution, social confounders, and
mortality in small areas of an industrial city. Soc Sci Med, 60: 2845-2863. 087381
Karr C; Lumley T; Schreuder A; Davis R; Larson T; Ritz B; Kaufman J. (2007). Effects of subchronic and chronic
exposure to ambient air pollutants on infant bronchiolitis. Am J Epidemiol, 165: 553-560. 090719
Karr C; Rudra C; Miller K; Gould T; Larson T; Sathyanarayana S; Koenig J. (2009). Infant exposure to fine
particulate matter and traffic and risk of hospitalization for RSV bronchiolitis in a region with lower
ambient air pollution. Environ Res, 109: 321-327. 191946
Karthikeyan VJ; Lip GYH. (2007). Peripheral artery disease and hypertension: the relation between ante-
brachial index and mortality. J Hum Hypertens, 21: 762-765. 156626
Kato A; Kagawa J. (2003). Morphological effects in rat lungs exposed to urban roadside air. Inhal Toxicol, 15:
799-818. 089563
Khattar RS; Swales JD; Dore C; Senior R; Lahiri A. (2001). Effect of aging on the prognostic significance of
ambulatory systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressure in essential hypertension. , 104: 783-789. 155896
Khoury Z; Schwartz R; Gottlieb S; Chenzbraun A; Stern S; Keren A. (1997). Relation of coronary artery disease
to atherosclerotic disease in the aorta, carotid, and femoral arteries evaluated by ultrasound. Am J
Cardiol, 80: 1429-1433. 156636
Kim JJ; Smorodinsky S; Lipsett M; Singer BC; Hodgson AT; Ostro B. (2004). Traffic-related air pollution near
busy roads: the East Bay children's Respiratory Health Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 170: 520-526.
087383
Kim OJ; Ha EH; Kim BM; Park HS; Jung WJ; Lee BE; Suh YJ; Kim YJ; Lee JT; Kim H; Hong YC. (2007). PM10
and pregnancy outcomes: a hospital-based cohort study of pregnant women in Seoul. J Occup Environ
Med, 49: 1394-1402. 156642
Kizu R; Okamura K; Toriba A; Mizokami A; Burnstein KL; KLinge CM; Hayakawa K. (2003). Antiandrogenic
activities of diesel exhaust particle extracts in PC3/AR human prostate carcinoma cells. , 76: 299-309.
096196
Knight EL; Curhan GC. (2003). Albuminuria: moving beyond traditional microalbuminuria cut-points. Current
Opinion Nephrol Hypertens, 12: 283-284. 179900
Knobel HH; Chen CJ; Liang KY. (1995). Sudden infant death syndrome in relation to weather and
optimetrically measured air pollution in Taiwan. , 96: 1106-1110. 155905
Krewski D. (2009). Evaluating the effects of ambient air pollution on life expectancy. N Engl J Med, 360: 413-
415. 190075
Krewski D; Burnett RT; Goldberg MS; Hoover K; Siemiatycki J; Jerrett M; Abrahamowicz M; White WH.
(2000). Reanalysis of the Harvard Six Cities study and the American Cancer Society study of particulate
air pollution and mortality: a special report of the Institute's Particle Epidemiology Reanalysis Project.
012281
Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi Y; Turner MC; Pope AC III; Thurston G; Calle EE;
Thun MJ. (2009). Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking
particulate air pollution and mortality. Health Effects Institute. Cambridge, MA. 140. 191193
Kulkarni N; Pierse N; Rushton L; Grigg J. (2006). Carbon in airway macrophages and lung function in children.
, 355: 21-30. 089257
Kunzli N; Bridevaux P-O; Liu S; Garcia-Esteban R; Schindler C; Gerbase M; Sunyer J; keidel D; Rochat T.
(2009). Traffic-related air pollution correlates with adult-onset asthma among never-smokers. Thorax, x:
x. 191949
Kunzli N; Jerrett MJ Mack WJ; Beckerman B; LaBree L; Gilliland F; Thomas D; Peters J; Hodis HN. (2005).
Ambient air pollution and atherosclerosis in Los Angeles. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 201-206. 087387
Kunzli N; Perez L; Lurmann F; Hricko A; Penfold B; McConnell R. (2008). An Attributable Risk Model for
Exposures Assumed to Cause Both Chronic Disease and its Exacerbations. , 19(2): 179-185. 129258
Lacasana M; Esplugues A; Ballester F. (2005). Exposure to ambient air pollution and prenatal and early
childhood health effects. , 20: 183-199. 155914
Laden F; Schwartz J; Speizer FE; Dockery DW. (2006). Reduction in fine particulate air pollution and mortality:
extended follow-up of the Harvard Six Cities study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 173: 667-672. 087605
July 2009
7-146
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Lee BE; Ha EH; Park HS; Kim YJ; Hong YC; Kim H; Lee JT. (2003). Exposure to air pollution during different
gestational phases contributes to risks of low birth weight. Hum Reprod, 18- 638-643. 043202
Leem J-H; Kaplan BM; Shim YK; Pohl HR; Gotway CA; Bullard SM; Rogers JF; Smith MM; Tylenda CA. (2006).
Exposures to air pollutants during pregnancy and preterm delivery. Environ Health Perspect, 114- 905"
910. 089828
Lemos M; Mohallen SJ Macchione MJ Dolhnikoff M; Assunaao J; Godleski J; Saldiva P. (2006). Chronic exposure
to urban air Pollution induces structural alterations in murine pulmonary and coronary arteries. Inhal
Toxicol, 18: 247-253. 088594
Li Y-J; Kawada T; Matsumoto A; Azuma A; Kudoh S; Takizawa H; Sugawara I. (2007). Airway inflammatory
responses to oxidative stress induced by low-dose diesel exhaust particle exposure differ between mouse
strains. , 33: 227-244. 155929
Lichtenfels AJFC; Gomes JB; Pieri PC; Miraglia SGEK; Hallak J; Saldiva PHN. (2007). Increased levels of air
pollution and a decrease in the human and mouse male-to-female ration in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Fertil
SterH, 87: 230-232. 097041
Lin C-M; Li C-Y; Mao I-F. (2004). Increased risks of term low "birth-weight infants in a petrochemical industrial
city with high air pollution levels. Arch Environ Occup Health, 59: 663-668. 089827
Lin CA; Pereira LAA; Nishioka DC; Conceicao GMS; Graga ALF; Saldiva PHN. (2004). Air pollution and
neonatal deaths in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Braz J Med Biol Res, 37: 765-770. 095787
Lipfert FW; Baty JD; Miller JP; Wyzga RE. (2006). PM2.5 constituents and related air quality variables as
predictors of survival in a cohort of U.S. military veterans. Inhal Toxicol, 18: 645-657. 088756
Lipfert FW; Wyzga RE; Baty JD; Miller JP. (2006). Traffic density as a surrogate measure of environmental
exposures in studies of air pollution health effects: long-term mortality in a cohort of US veterans. Atmos
Environ, 40: 154-169. 088218
Lipfert FW; Zhang J; Wyzga RE. (2000). Infant mortality and air pollution: a comprehensive analysis of US data
for 1990. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 50: 1350-1366. 004103
Lippmann M; Gordon T; Chen LC. (2005). Effects of subchronic exposures to concentrated ambient particles in
mice. IX. Integral assessment and human health implications of subchronic exposures of mice to CAPs.
Inhal Toxicol, 17: 255-261. 087452
Liu L-JS; Curjuric I; Keidel D; Heldstab J; Kunzli N; Bayer-Oglesby L; Ackermann-Liebrich U; Schindler C;
SAPALDIA team. (2007). Characterization of source-specific air pollution exposure for a large
population-based Swiss cohort (SAPALDIA). Environ Health Perspect, 115: 1638-1645. 093093
Liu S; Krewski D; Shi Y; Chen Y; Burnett R. (2007). Association between maternal exposure to ambient air
pollutants during pregnancy and fetal growth restriction. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 17: 426-432.
090429
Liu YQ; Keane M; Ensell M; Miller W', Kashon M; Ong TM; Mauderly J; Lawson D; Gautam M; Zielinska B;
Whitney K; Eberhardt J; Wallace W. (2005). In vitro genotoxicity of exhaust emissions of diesel and
gasoline engine vehicles operated on a unified driving cycle. J Environ Monit, T- 60-66. 192098
Loomis D; Castillejos M; Gold DR; McDonnell W; Borja-Aburto VH. (1999). Air pollution and infant mortality in
Mexico City. , 10: 118-123. 087288
Lopes FD; Pinto TS; Arantes-Costa FM; Moriya HT; Biselli PJ; Ferraz LF; Lichtenfels AJ; Saldiva PH; Mauad
T; Martins MA. (2009). Exposure to ambient levels of particles emitted by traffic worsens emphysema in
mice. Environ Res, 109: 544-551. 190430
Lund AK; Knuckles TL; Obot Akata C; Shohet R; McDonald JD; Gigliotti A; Seagrave JC; Campen MJ. (2007).
Gasoline exhaust emissions induce vascular remodeling pathways involved in atherosclerosis. , 95: 485"
94. 125741
Maciejczyk P; Chen LC. (2005). Effects of subchronic exposures to concentrated ambient particles (CAPs) in
mice: VIII source-related daily variations in in vitro responses to CAPs. Inhal Toxicol, 17: 243-253.
087456
Mackman N> Tilley RE; Key NS. (2007). Role of the extrinsic pathway of blood coagulation in hemostasis and
thrombosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vase Biol, 27: 1687-1693. 156723
Maheswaran R; Haining RP; Brindley P; Law J; Pearson T; Fryers PR; Wise S; Campbell MJ. (2005). Outdoor
air pollution and stroke in Sheffield, United Kingdom: a small-area level geographical study. , 36: 239"
243. 088683
Maheswaran R; Haining RP; Brindley P; Law J; Pearson T; Fryers PR; Wise S; Campbell MJ. (2005). Outdoor
air pollution, mortality, and hospital admissions from coronary heart disease in Sheffield, UK: a small-
area level ecological study. Eur Heart J, 26: 2543-2549. 090769
Maisonet M; Bush TJ; Correa A; Jaakkola JJK. (2001). Relation between ambient air pollution and low birth
weight in the northeastern United States. Environ Health Perspect, 1093: 351-356. 016624
July 2009
7-147
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Maisonet M> Correa A; Misra D; Jaakkola JJ. (2004). A review of the literature on the effects of ambient air
pollution on fetal growth. Environ Res, 95- 106-115. 156725
Mannes T> Jalaludin B; Morgan Gi Lincoln D; Sheppeard V; Corbett S. (2005). Impact of ambient air pollution
on birth weight in Sydney, Australia. Occup Environ Med, 62: 524-530. 087895
Matsumoto A; Hiramatsu Ki Li Yi Azuma A; Kudoh Si Takizawa Hi Sugawara I. (2006). Repeated exposure to
low-dose diesel exhaust after allergen challenge exaggerates asthmatic responses in mice. , 121: 227-235.
098017
Mauad Ti Rivero DHi de Oliveira RCi Lichtenfels AJi Guimaraes ETi de Andre PAi Kasahara Dli Bueno HMi
Saldiva PH. (2008). Chronic exposure to ambient levels of urban particles affects mouse lung
development. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 178: 721-728. 156743
McConnell Ri Berhane Ki Gilliland Fi London SJi Vora Hi Avol Ei Gauderman WJi Margolis HGi Lurmann Fi
Thomas DCi Peters JM. (1999). Air pollution and bronchitic symptoms in southern California children
with asthma. Environ Health Perspect, 107: 757-760. 007028
McConnell Ri Berhane Ki Gilliland Fi Molitor Ji Thomas Di Lurmann Fi Avol Ei Gauderman WJi Peters JM.
(2003). Prospective study of air pollution and bronchitic symptoms in children with asthma. Am J Respir
Crit Care Med, 168: 790-797. 049490
McDonald JDi Reed MDi Campen MJi Barrett EGi Seagrave Ji Mauderly JL. (2007). Health effects of inhaled
gasoline engine emissions. Inhal Toxicol, 19 Suppl l: 107-116. 156746
McDonnell WFi Nishino-Ishikawa Ni Petersen FFi Chen LHi Abbey DE. (2000). Relationships of mortality with
the fine and coarse fractions of long-term ambient PM10 concentrations in nonsmokers. J Expo Sci
Environ Epidemiol, 10: 427-436. 010319
Medeiros Ai Gouveia N. (2005). Relacao entre baixo peso ao nascer e a poluicao do ar no Municipio de Sao Paulo
[Relationship between low birthweight and air pollution in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil]. Rev Saude
Publica, 39: 65-72. 089824
Mehta RHi Anad Kumar TC. (1997). Declining semen quality in Bangaloreans: A preliminary report. Curr Sci,
72: 621-622. 157197
Menache MGi Miller FJi Raabe OG. (1995). Particle inhalability curves for humans and small laboratory
animals. Ann Occup Hyg, 39: 317-328. 006533
Meng YYi Wilhelm Mi Rull RPi English Pi Ritz B. (2007). Traffic and outdoor air pollution levels near
residences and poorly controlled asthma in adults. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 98: 455-63. 093275
Miller KAi Siscovick DSi Sheppard Li Shepherd Ki Sullivan JHi Anderson GLi Kaufman JD. (2007). Long-term
exposure to air pollution and incidence of cardiovascular events in women. , 356: 447-458. 090130
Mogensen CE. (1984). Microalbuminuria predicts clinical proteinuria and early mortality in maturity-onset
diabetes. , 310: 356-360. 156769
Mohallem SVi de Araujo Lobo DJi Pesquero CRi Assuncao JVi de Andre PAi Saldiva PHi Dolhnikoff M. (2005).
Decreased fertility in mice exposed to environmental air pollution in the city of Sao Paulo. Environ Res,
98: 196-202. 088657
Mollet NRi Cademartiri F; de Feyter PJ. (2005). Non -invasive multislice CT coronary imaging. Heart, 91: 401-
407. 155988
Montauban van Swijndregt AD; De Lange EE; De Groot E; Ackerstaff RG. (1999). An in vivo evaluation of the
reproducibility of intima-media thickness measurements of the carotid artery segments using B-mode
ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol, 25: 323-330. 156777
Morgenstern V; Zutavern A; Cyrys J; Brockow I; Koletzko S; Kramer U; Behrendt H; Herbarth O; von Berg A;
Bauer CP; Wichmann HE; Heinrich J. (2008). Atopic diseases, allergic sensitization, and exposure to
traffic-related air pollution in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 177: 1331-1337. 156782
Mortimer K; Neugebauer R; Lurmann F; Alcorn S; Balmes J; Tager I. (2008). Early-Lifetime exposure to air
pollution and allergic sensitizationin children with asthma. J Asthma, 45: 874-881. 187280
Naess O; Nafstad P; Aamodt G; Claussen B; Rosland P. (2007). Relation between concentration of air pollution
and cause-specific mortality: four-year exposures to nitrogen dioxide and particulate matter pollutants in
470 neighborhoods in Oslo, Norway. Am J Epidemiol, 165: 435-443. 090736
National Kidney Foundation. (2008). Chronic Kidney Disease: Evaluation, Classification, and Stratification. The
National Kidney Foundation . Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative. 156796
Newman AB; Sutton-Tyrrell K; Vogt MT; Kuller LH. (1993). Morbidity and mortality in hypertensive adults
with a low ankle/arm blood pressure index. JAMA, 270: 487-489. 156805
Nordling E; Berglind N; Melen E; Emenius G; Hallberg J; Nyberg F; Pershagen G; Svartengren M; Wickman M;
Bellander T. (2008). Traffic-related air pollution and childhood respiratory symptoms, function and
allergies. , 19: 401-8. 097998
July 2009
7-148
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
O'Leary DH; Polak JF; Kronmal RA; Kittner SJ; Bond MG; Wolfson SK, Jr.; Bommer W> Price TR; Gardin JM;
Savage PJ. (1992). Distribution and correlates of sonographically detected carotid artery disease in the
Cardiovascular Health Study. The CHS Collaborative Research Group. , 23- 1752-1760. 156825
O'Leary DH; Polak JF; Kronmal RA; Manolio TA; Burke GL; Wolfson SK, Jr. (1999). Carotid-artery intima and
media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. Cardiovascular
Health Study Collaborative Research Group. , 340- 14-22. 156826
O'Neill MS; Diez-Roux AV; Auchincloss AH; Franklin TG; Jacobs Jnr DR; Astor BC; Dvonch JT; Kaufman J.
(2007). Airborne particulate matter exposure and urinary albumin excretion- The Multi-Ethnic Study of
Atherosclerosis. Occup Environ Med. 156006
Oei HH; Vhegenthart R; Hak AE; Iglesias del Sol A; Hofman A; Oudkerk M; Witteman JC. (2002). The
association between coronary calcification assessed by electron beam computed tomography and
measures of extracoronary atherosclerosis' the Rotterdam Coronary Calcification Study. J Am Coll
Cardiol, 39: 1745-1751. 156820
Oftedal B; Brunekreef B; Nystad W; Madsen C; Walker S"E; Nafstad P. (2008). Residential outdoor air pollution
and lung function in schoolchildren. , 19: 129-137. 093202
Oftedal B; Brunekreef B; Nystad W', Nafstad P. (2007). Residential outdoor air pollution and allergen
sensitization in schoolchildren in Oslo, Norway. , 37: 1632. 191948
Oh S-M; Chung K"H. (2006). Identification of mammalian cell genotoxins in respirable diesel exhaust particles
by bioassay-directed chemical analysis. Toxicol Lett, 161: 226-235. 088296
Ono N; Oshio S; Niwata Y; Yoshida S; Tsukue N; Sugawara I; Takano H; Takeda K. (2007). Prenatal exposure
to diesel exhaust impairs mouse spermatogenesis. Inhal Toxicol, 19: 275-281. 156007
Ozkaynak H; Thurston GD. (1987). Associations between 1980 US mortality rates and alternative measures of
airborne particle concentration. Risk Anal, T- 449-461. 072960
Palli D; Saieva C; Munnia A; Peluso M; Grechi D; Zanna I; Caini S; Decarli A; Sera F; Masala G. (2008). DNA
adducts and PM10 exposure in traffic-exposed workers and urban residents from the EPIC"Florence City
study. Sci Total Environ, 403: 105-112. 156837
Parker JD; Mendola P; Woodruff TJ. (2008). Preterm birth after the utah valley steel mill closure: a natural
experiment. , 19: 820-823. 156013
Parker JD; Woodruff TJ. (2008). Influences of study design and location on the relationship between particulate
matter air pollution and birthweight. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 22: 214-227. 156846
Parker JD; Woodruff TJ; Basu R; Schoendorf KC. (2005). Air pollution and birth weight among term infants in
California. , 115: 121-128. 087462
Pedersen M; Vinzents P; Petersen JH; KLeinjans JC; Plas G; Kirsch-Volders M; Dostal M; Rossner P; Beskid O;
Sram RJ; Merlo DF; Knudsen LE. (2006). Cytogenetic effects in children and mothers exposed to air
pollution assessed by the frequency of micronuclei and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): a family
pilot study in the Czech Republic. , 608: 112-120. 156848
Penard-Morand C; Charpin D; Raherison C; Kopferschmitt C; Caillaud D; Lavaud F; Annesi-Maesano I. (2005).
Long-term exposure to background air pollution related to respiratory and allergic health in
schoolchildren. Clin Exp Allergy, 35: 1279-1287. 087951
Penna MLF; Duchiade MP. (1991). Air pollution and infant mortality from pneumonia in the Rio de Janeiro
metropolitan area. Bull Pan Am Health Organ, 25: 47-54. 073325
Pereira LAA; Loomis D; Conceicao GMS; Braga ALF; Areas RM; Kishi HS; Singer JM; Bohm GM; Saldiva PHN.
(1998). Association between air pollution and intrauterine mortality in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Environ Health
Perspect, 106: 325-329. 007264
Peters A; Skorkovsky J; Kotesovec F; Brynda J; Spix C; Wichmann HE; Heinrich J. (2000). Associations
between mortality and air pollution in central Europe. Environ Health Perspect, 108: 283-287. 001756
Pierse N; Rushton L; Harris RS; Kuehni CE; Silverman M; Grigg J. (2006). Locally-generated particulate
pollution and respiratory symptoms in young children. Thorax, 61: 216-220. 088757
Pignoli P; Tremoli E; Poli A; Oreste P; Paoletti R. (1986). Intimal plus medial thickness of the arterial wall: a
direct measurement with ultrasound imaging. , 74: 1399-1406. 156026
Pinkerton KE; Zhou Y; Teague SV; Peake JL; Walther RC; Kennedy IM; Leppert VJ; Aust AE. (2004). Reduced
lung cell proliferation following short-term exposure to ultrafine soot and iron particles in neonatal rats:
key to impaired lung growth?. Inhal Toxicol, l: 73-81. 087465
Pires-Neto RC; Lichtenfels AJ; Soares SR; Macchione M; Saldiva PHN; Dolhnikoff M. (2006). Effects of Sao
Paulo air pollution on the upper airways of mice. , 101: 356-361. 096734
Poma A; Limongi T; Pisani C; Granato V; Picozzi P. (2006). Genotoxicity induced by fine urban air particulate
matter in the macrophages cell line RAW 264.7. Toxicol In Vitro, 20: 1023-1029. 096903
Pope CA 3rd; Ezzati M; Dockery DW. (2009). Fine-particulate air pollution and life expectancy in the United
States. N Engl J Med, 360: 376-386. 190107
July 2009
7-149
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Pope CA III. (1989). Respiratory disease associated with community air pollution and a steel mill, Utah Valley.
Am J Public Health, 79: 623-628. 044461
Pope CA IIL Burnett RT. (2007). Confounding in air pollution epidemiology: the broader context. , 18: 424-426.
090928
Pope CA IIL Burnett RT; Thun MJ; Calle EE; Krewski D; Ito K; Thurston GD. (2002). Lung cancer,
cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. JAMA, 287: 1132"
1141. 024689
Pope CA IIL Burnett RT; Thurston GD; Thun MJ; Calle EE; Krewski D; Godleski JJ. (2004). Cardiovascular
mortality and long-term exposure to particulate air pollution: epidemiological evidence of general
pathophysiological pathways of disease. , 109: 71-77. 055880
Pope CA IIL Thun MJ; Namboodiri MM; Dockery DW; Evans JS; Speizer FE; Heath CW Jr. (1995). Particulate
air pollution as a predictor of mortality in a prospective study of US adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med,
151: 669-674. 045159
Puett RC; Schwartz J; Hart JE; Yanosky JD; Speizer FE; Suh H; Paciorek CJ; Neas LM; Laden F. (2008).
Chronic particulate exposure, mortality, and coronary heart disease in the nurses' health study. Am J
Epidemiol, 168: 1161-1168. 156891
Raizenne M; Neas LM; Damokosh AL Dockery DW; Spengler JD; Koutrakis P; Ware JH; Speizer FE. (1996).
Health effects of acid aerosols on North American children: pulmonary function. Environ Health
Perspect, 104: 506-514. 077268
Ramos C; Cisneros J; Gonzalez-Avila G; Becerril C; Ruiz V; Montano M. (2009). Increase of matrix
metalloproteinases in woodsmoke-induced lung emphysema in guinea pigs. Inhal Toxicol, 21: 119-132.
190116
Reed MD; Barrett EG; Campen MJ; Divine KK; Gigliotti AP; McDonald JD; Seagrave JC; Mauderly JL; Seilkop
SK; Swenberg JA. (2008). Health effects of subchronic inhalation exposure to gasoline engine exhaust.
Inhal Toxicol, 20: 1125-1143. 156903
Reed MD; Campen MJ; Gigliotti AP; Harrod KS; McDonald JD; Seagrave JC; Mauderly JL; Seilkop SK. (2006).
Health effects of subchronic exposure to environmental levels of hardwood smoke. Inhal Toxicol, 18: 523"
539. 156043
Reed MD; Gigliotti AP; McDonald JD; Seagrave JC; Seilkop SK; Mauderly JL. (2004). Health effects of
subchronic exposure to environmental levels of diesel exhaust. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 177-193. 055625
Resnick HE; Lindsay RS; McDermott MM; Devereux RB; Jones KL; Fabsitz RR; Howard BV. (2004).
Relationship of high and low ankle brachial index to all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality: the
Strong Heart Study. , 109: 733-739. 156048
Reymao MSF; Cury PM; Lichtenfels AJFC; Lemos M; Battlehner CN; Conceicao GMS; Capelozzi VL; Montes
GS; Junior MF; Martins MA; Bohm GM; Saldiva PHN. (1997). Urban air pollution enhances the
formation of urethane-induced lung tumors in mice. Environ Res, 74: 150-158. 084653
Rich DQ; Demissie K; Lu SE; Kamat L; Wartenberg D; Rhoads GG. (2009). Ambient air pollutant
concentrations during pregnancy and the risk of fetal growth restriction. J Epidemiol Community
Health, In Press: 1-9. 180122
Ritz B; Wilhelm M. (2008). Ambient air pollution and adverse birth outcomes: methodologic issues in an
emerging field. ,102: 182-190. 156914
Ritz B; Wilhelm M; Hoggatt KJ; Ghosh JK. (2007). Ambient air pollution and preterm birth in the environment
and pregnancy outcomes study at the University of California, Los Angeles. Am J Epidemiol, 166: 1045"
52.096146
Ritz B; Wilhelm M; Zhao Y. (2006). Air pollution and infant death in southern California, 1989-2000. , 118: 493-
502. 089819
Ritz B; Yu F; Chapa G; Fruin S. (2000). Effect of air pollution on preterm birth among children born in Southern
California between 1989 and 1993. , 11: 502-511. 012068
Ritz B; Yu F; Fruin S; Chapa G; Shaw GM; Harris JA. (2002). Ambient air pollution and risk of birth defects in
Southern California. Am J Epidemiol, 155: 17-25. 023227
Rogers JF; Dunlop AL. (2006). Air pollution and very low birth weight infants: a target population?. , 118: 156"
164. 091232
Rojas-Martinez R; Perez-Padilla R; Olaiz-Fernandez G; Mendoza-Alvarado L; Moreno-Macias H; Fortoul T;
McDonnell W; Loomis D; Romieu I. (2007). Lung function growth in children with long-term exposure to
air pollutants in Mexico City. , 176: 377-84. 188508
Roman HA; Walker KD; Walsh TL; Conner L; Richmond HM; Hubbell BJ; Kinney PL. (2008). Expert judgment
assessment of the mortality impact of changes in ambient fine particulate matter in the U.S. Environ Sci
Technol, 42: 2268-2274. 156921
July 2009
7-150
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Romieu L Garcia-Esteban R; Sunyer J; Rios C> Alcaraz-Zubeldia Mi Velasco SRi Holguin F. (2008). The effect of
supplementation with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on markers of oxidative stress in elderly
exposed to PM(2.5). Environ Health Perspect, 116: 1237-1242. 156922
Romieu Ii Ramirez "Aguilar Mi Moreno-Macias Hi Barraza-Villarreal Ai Miller Pi Hernandez-Cadena Li
Carbajal"Arroyo LAi Hernandez-Avila M. (2004). Infant mortality and air pollution: modifying effect by
social class. J Occup Environ Hyg, 46: 1210-1216. 093074
Rosenlund Mi Bellander Ti Nordquist Ti Alfredsson L. (2009). Traffic-generated air pollution and myocardial
infarction. Epidemiology, 20: 265-71. 190309
Rosenlund Mi Berglind Ni Pershagen Gi Hallqvist Ji Jonson Ti Bellander T. (2006). Long-term exposure to
urban air pollution and myocardial infarction. , 17: 383-390. 089796
Ross R. (1999). Atherosclerosis--an inflammatory disease. , 340: 115-126. 156926
Rubes Ji Selevan SGi Evenson DP; Zudova D; Vozdova M; Zudova Z; Robbins WA; Perreault SD. (2005).
Episodic air pollution is associated with increased DNA fragmentation in human sperm without other
changes in semen quality. Hum Reprod, 20: 2776-2783. 078091
Ruggenenti P; Remuzzi G. (2006). Time to abandon microalbuminuria?. Kidney Int, 70' 1214-1222. 156933
Roosli M; Braun-Fahrlander C; Kunzli N; Oglesby L; Theis G; Camenzind M; Mathys P; Staehelin J. (2000).
Spatial variability of different fractions of particulate matter within an urban environment and between
urban and rural sites. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 50: 1115-1124. 010296
Roosli M; Kunzli N> Braun-Fahrlander C> Egger M. (2005). Years of life lost attributable to air pollution in
Switzerland: dynamic exposure-response model. Int J Epidemiol, 34: 1029-1035. 156923
Roosli M; Theis G; Kunzli N; Staehelin J; Mathys P; Oglesby L; Camenzind M; Braun-Fahrlander C. (2001).
Temporal and spatial variation of the chemical composition of PM10 at urban and rural sites in the Basel
area, Switzerland. Atmos Environ, 35: 3701-3713. 108738
Sagiv SE Mendola P; Loomis D; Herring AH; Neas LM; Savitz DA; Poole C. (2005). A time-series analysis of air
pollution and preterm birth in Pennsylvania, 1997-2001. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 602-606. 087468
Salam MT Millstein J; Li Y-F; Lurmann FW; Margolis HG; Gilliland FD. (2005). Birth outcomes and prenatal
exposure to ozone, carbon monoxide, and particulate matter: results from the Children's Health Study.
Environ Health Perspect, 113: 1638-1644. 087885
Salonen JT Salonen R. (1991). Ultrasonographically assessed carotid morphology and the risk of coronary heart
disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vase Biol, 11: 1245-1249. 156938
Sato H; Suzuki Kazuo T; Sone H; Yamano Y; Kagawa J; Aoki Y. (2003). DNA-adduct formation in lungs, nasal
mucosa, and livers of rats exposed to urban roadside air in Kawasaki City, Japan. , 93: 36"44. 096615
Schatz M; Zeiger RS; Hoffman CP. (1990). Intrauterine growth is related to gestational pulmonary function in
pregnant asthmatic women. Kaiser-Permanente Asthma and Pregnancy Study Group. , 98: 389-392.
156073
Schikowski T; Sugiri D; Ranft U; Gehring U; Heinrich J; Wichmann HE; Kramer U. (2005). Long-term air
pollution exposure and living close to busy roads are associated with COPD in women. Respir Res, 22:
152-161. 088637
Schindler C; Keidel D; Gerbase MW; Zemp E; Bettschart R; Brandli O; Brutsche MH; Burdet L; Karrer W;
Knopfli B; Pons M; Rapp R; Bayer-Oglesby L; Kunzli N> Schwartz J; Liu L-JS; Ackermann-Liebrich U;
Rochat T; the SAPALDIA Team. (2009). Improvements in PM10 exposure and reduced rates of
respiratory symptoms in a cohort of swiss adults (SAPALDIA). , 179: 579-587. 191950
Schwartz J; Coull B; Laden F; Ryan L. (2008). The effect of dose and timing of dose on the association between
airborne particles and survival. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 64"69. 156963
Seagrave J; McDonald JD; Reed MD; Seilkop SK; Mauderly JL. (2005). Responses to subchronic inhalation of
low concentrations of diesel exhaust and hardwood smoke measured in rat bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.
Inhal Toxicol, 17: 657-670. 088000
Selevan SG; Borkovec L; Slott VL; Zudova Z; Rubes J; Evenson DP; Perreault SD. (2000). Semen quality and
reproductive health of young Czech men exposed to seasonal air pollution. Environ Health Perspect, 108:
887-894. 012578
Sevastyanova 0; Binkova B; Topinka J; Sram RJ; Kalina I; Popov T Novakova Z; Farmer PB. (2007). In vitro
genotoxicity of PAH mixtures and organic extract from urban air particles part II: human cell lines. , 620:
123-134. 156969
Sharma AK; Jensen KA; Rank J; White PA; Lundstedt S; Gagne R; Jacobsen NR; Kristiansen J; Vogel U; Wallin
H. (2007). Genotoxicity, inflammation and physico-chemical properties of fine particle samples from an
incineration energy plant and urban air. , 633: 95-111. 156975
Shaw LJ; Raggi P; Schisterman E; Berman DS; Callister TQ. (2003). Prognostic value of cardiac risk factors and
coronary artery calcium screening for all-cause mortality. Radiology, 228: 826-833. 156083
July 2009
7-151
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Shemesh J; Tenenbaum A; Fisman EZ; Apter Si Rath Si Rozenman Ji Itzchak Yi Motro M. (1996). Absence of
coronary calcification on double "helical CT scans' predictor of angiographic ally normal coronary arteries
in elderly women?. Radiology, 199- 665-668. 156085
Shinkura Ri Fijuyama Ci Akiba S. (1999). Relationship between ambient sulfur dioxide levels and neonatal
mortality near the Mt. Sakurajima volcano in Japan. , 9- 344-349. 156978
Silva PJi Erupe ME; Price D; Elias J; Malloy QG; Li Q; Warren B; Cocker DR, 3rd. (2008). Trimethylamine as
precursor to secondary organic aerosol formation via nitrate radical reaction in the atmosphere. Environ
Sci Technol, 42: 4689-4696. 156981
Slama R; Darrow L; Parker J; Woodruff TJ; Strickland M> Nieuwenhuijsen Mi Glinianaia Si Hoggatt KJi
Kannan Si Hurley Fi Kalinka Ji Sram Ri Brauer Mi Wilhelm Mi Heinrich Ji Ritz B. (2008). Meeting
report: atmospheric pollution and human reproduction. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 791-798. 156985
Slama Ri Morgenstern Vi Cyrys Ji Zutavern Ai Herbarth Oi Wichmann HEi Heinrich Ji LISA Study Group.
(2007). Traffic-related atmospheric pollutants levels during pregnancy and offspring's term birth weight:
a study relying on a land-use regression exposure model. Environ Health Perspect, 115: 1283-1292.
093216
Smilde TJi Wollersheim Hi Van Langen Hi Stalenhoef AF. (1997). Reproducibility of ultrasonographic
measurements of different carotid and femoral artery segments in healthy subjects and in patients with
increased intima-media thickness. Clin Sci (Lond), 93: 317-324. 156988
Sokol RZi Kraft Pi Fowler IMi Mamet Ri Kim E> Berhane KT. (2006). Exposure to environmental ozone alters
semen quality. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 360-5. 098539
Solomon Pi Baumann Ki Edgerton E> Tanner Ri Eatough Di Modey W> Marin Hi Savoie D> Natarajan Si Meyer
MB. (2003). Comparison of integrated samplers for mass and composition during the 1999 Atlanta
supersites project. J Geophys Res, 108: 8423. 156994
Somers CM; McCarry BE; Malek F; Quinn JS. (2004). Reduction of particulate air pollution lowers the risk of
heritable mutations in mice. , 304: 1008-1010. 078098
Somers CM; Yauk CL; White PA; Parfett CLJ; Quinn JS. (2002). Air pollution induces heritable DNA
mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 99: 15904-15907. 078100
Song CL; Zhou YC; Huang RJ; Wang YQ; Huang QF; Lu G; Liu KM. (2007). Influence of ethanol-diesel blended
fuels on diesel exhaust emissions and mutagenic and genotoxic activities of particulate extracts. , 149:
355-63. 188903
Sorensen M; Schins RP; Hertel O; Loft S. (2005). Transition metals in personal samples of PM2.5 and oxidative
stress in human volunteers. , 14: 1340-3. 188901
Sram R; Beskid O; Binkova B; Chvatalova I; Lnenickova Z; Milcova A; Solansky I; Tulupova E; Bavorova H;
Ocadlikova D. (2007). Chromosomal aberrations in environmentally exposed population in relation to
metabolic and DNA repair genes polymorphisms. , 620: 22"33. 188457
Sram RJ; Beskid O; Rossnerova A; Rossner P; Lnenickova Z; Milcova A; Solansky I; Binkova B. (2007).
Environmental exposure to carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons-"the interpretation of
cytogenetic analysis by FISH. Toxicol Lett, 172: 12-20. 192084
Sram RJ; Binkova B; Dejmek J; Bobak M. (2005). Ambient air pollution and pregnancy outcomes: a review of
the literature. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 375-382. 087442
Stanojevic S; Wade A; Stocks J; Hankinson J; Coates AL; Pan H; Rosenthal M; Corey M; Lebecque P; Cole TJ.
(2008). Reference ranges for spirometry across all ages: a new approach. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 177:
253-260. 157007
Stacker R; Keaney JF Jr. (2004). Role of oxidative modifications in atherosclerosis. Physiol Rev, 84: 1381-1478.
157013
Strom KA; Garg BD; Johnson JT; D'Arcy JB; Smiler KL. (1990). Inhaled particle retention in rats receiving low
exposures of diesel exhaust. J Toxicol Environ Health, 29: 377-398. 157020
Sugamata M; Ihara T; Takano H; Oshio S; Takeda K. (2006). Maternal diesel exhaust exposure damages
newborn murine brains. Eisei Kagaku, 52: 82"84. 097166
Sugiri D; Ranft U; Schikowski T; Kramer U. (2006). The influence of large-scale airborne particle decline and
traffic-related exposure on children's lung function. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 282-288. 088760
Suh YJ; Ha EH; Park H; Kim YJ; Kim H; Hong YC. (2008). GSTM1 polymorphism along with PM10 exposure
contributes to the risk of preterm delivery. , 656: 62"67. 192077
Sun Q; Wang A; Jin X; Natanzon A; Duquaine D; Brook RD; Aguinaldo J-GS; Fayad ZA; Fuster V; Lippmann M;
Chen Lung C; Rajagopalan S. (2005). Long-term air pollution exposure and acceleration of
atherosclerosis and vascular inflammation in an animal model. , 294: 3003-3010. 186814
July 2009
7-152
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Sun Q; Yue P; Deiuliis JA; Lumeng CN; Kampfrath T; Mikolaj MB; Cai Y; Ostrowski MC; Lu B; Parthasarathy
S> Brook RD; Moffatt-Bruce SD; Chen LC; Rajagopalan S. (2009). Ambient air pollution exaggerates
adipose inflammation and insulin resistance in a mouse model of diet-induced obesity. Circulation, 119:
538-546. 190487
Sun Q; Yue P; Kirk RI; Wang A; Moatti D; Jin X; Lu B; Schecter AD; Lippmann M; Gordon T; Chen LC;
Rajagopalan S. (2008). Ambient air particulate matter exposure and tissue factor expression in
atherosclerosis. Inhal Toxicol, 20- 127-137. 157033
Sun Q; Yue P; Ying Z; Cardounel AJ; Brook RD; Devlin R; Hwang JS; Zweier JL; Chen LC; Rajagopalan S.
(2008). Air Pollution Exposure Potentiates Hypertension Through Reactive Oxygen Species-Mediated
Activation of Rho/ROCK. Arterioscler Thromb Vase Biol, 28- 1760-1766. 157032
Suwa T; Hogg JC; Quinlan KB; Ohgami A; Vincent R; Van Eeden SF. (2002). Particulate air pollution induces
progression of atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol, 39: 935-942. 028588
Tarantini L; Bonzini M; Apostoli P; Pegoraro V; Bollati V; Marinelli B; Cantone L; Rizzo G; Hou L; Schwartz J;
Bertazzi PA; Baccarelh A. (2009). Effects of particulate matter on genomic DNA methylation content and
iNOS promoter methylation. Environ Health Perspect, 117: 217-222. 192010
Tesfaigzi Y; McDonald JD; Reed MD; Singh SP; De Sanctis GT; Eynott PR; Hahn FF; Campen MJ; Mauderly
JL. (2005). Low-level subchronic exposure to wood smoke exacerbates inflammatory responses in allergic
rats. , 88: 505-513. 156116
Tesfaigzi Y; Singh SP; Foster JE; Kubatko J; Barr EB; Fine PM; McDonald JD; Hahn FF; Mauderly JL. (2002).
Health effects of subchronic exposure to low levels of wood smoke in rats. Toxicol Sci, 65: 115-125. 025575
Thurlbeck WM. (1982). Postnatal human lung growth. Thorax, 37: 564-571. 093260
Tokiwa H; Sera N; Nakanishi Y. (2005). Involvement of alveolar macrophages in the formation of 8-
oxodeoxyguanosine associated with exogenous particles in human lungs. Inhal Toxicol, 17: 577. 191952
Tong S; Colditz P. (2004). Air pollution and sudden infant death syndrome: a literature review. Paediatr Perinat
Epidemiol, 18: 327-335. 087883
Tovalin H; Valverde M; Morandi MT; Blanco S; Whitehead L; Rojas E. (2006). DNA damage in outdoor workers
occupationally exposed to environmental air pollutants. Occup Environ Med, 63: 230-236. 091322
Tozuka Y; Watanabe N; Ohsawa M; Toriba A; Kizu R; Hayakawa K. (2004). Transfer of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons to fetuses and breast milk of rats exposed to diesel exhaust. Eisei Kagaku, 50: 497-502.
090864
Tsai S-S; Chen C"C; Hsieh H-J; Chang C-C; Yang C-Y. (2006). Air pollution and postneonatal mortality in a
tropical city: Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Inhal Toxicol, 18: 185-189. 090709
Tsukue N; Tsubone H; Suzuki AK. (2002). Diesel exhaust affects the abnormal delivery in pregnant mice and
the growth of their young. Inhal Toxicol, 14: 635-651. 030593
Tsukue N; Yoshida S; Sugawara I; Taked K. (2004). Effect of diesel exhaust on development of fetal
reproductive function in ICR female mice. Eisei Kagaku, 50: 174-80. 096643
U.S. EPA. (1996). Air quality criteria for particulate matter. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Research
Triangle Park, NC. EPA/600/P-95/001aF-cF. 079380
U.S. EPA. (2002). Health assessment document for diesel engine exhaust. 042866
U.S. EPA. (2004). Air quality criteria for particulate matter. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Research
Triangle Park, NC. EPA/600/P"99/002aF"bF. 056905
U.S. EPA. (2005). Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Just.
086237
U.S. EPA. (2006). Provisional Assessment of Recent Studies on Health Effects of Particulate Matter Exposure.
U.S. Environmental Protection AGency. Research Triangle Park, NC. 157071
Valentine R; Himmelstein MW. (2001). Overview of the acute, subchronic, reproductive, developmental and
genetic toxicology of "beta"-chloroprene. Chem Biol Interact, 135: 81-100. 019011
van der Meer IM; Bots ML; Hofman A; del Sol AI; van der Kuip DA; Witteman JC. (2004). Predictive value of
noninvasive measures of atherosclerosis for incident myocardial infarction: the Rotterdam Study.
Circulation, 109: 1089-1094. 156129
Veras MM; Damaceno-Rodrigues NR; Caldini EG; Maciel Ribeiro AA; Mayhew TM; Saldiva PH; Dolhnikoff M.
(2008). Particulate urban air pollution affects the functional morphology of mouse placenta. Biol Reprod,
79: 578-584. 190493
Veras MM; Damaceno-Rodrigues NR; Guimaraes Silva RM; Scoriza JN; Saldiva PH; Caldini EG; Dolhnikoff M.
(2009). Chronic exposure to fine particulate matter emitted by traffic affects reproductive and fetal
outcomes in mice. Environ Res, 109: 536-543. 190496
Villeneuve PJ; Goldberg MS; Krewski D; Burnett RT; Chen Y. (2002). Fine particulate air pollution and all-
cause mortality within the Harvard six-cities study: variations in risk by period of exposure. Ann
Epidemiol, 12: 568-576. 042576
July 2009
7-153
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Vineis P; Hoek G> Krzyzanowski M> Vigna-Taglianti Fi Veglia Fi Airoldi Li Autrup Hi Dunning Ai Garte Si
Hainaut Pi Malaveille Ci Matullo Gi Overvad Ki Raaschou-Nielsen Oi Clavel-Chapelon Fi Linseisen Ji
Boeing Hi Trichopoulou Ai Palli Di Peluso Mi Krogh Vi Tumino Ri Panico Si Bueno-De-Mesquita HBi
Peeters PHi Lund EEi Gonzalez CAi Martinez Ci Dorronsoro Mi Barricarte Ai Cirera Li Quiros JR.;
Berglund Gi Forsberg Bi Day NEi Key TJi Saracci Ri Kaaks Ri Riboli E. (2006). Air pollution and risk of
lung cancer in a prospective study in Europe. Int J Cancer, 119- 169-174. 192089
Vinzents PSi Moller Pi Sorensen Mi Knudsen LEi Herte LQi Jensen FPi Schibye Bi Loft S. (2005). Personal
exposure to ultrafine particles and oxidative DNA damage. Environ Health Perspect, 113- 1485-1490.
087482
Vogt MTi Cauley JAi Newman ABi Kuller LHi Hulley SB. (1993). Decreased ankle/arm blood pressure index
and mortality in elderly women. JAMA, 270- 465-469. 157100
Wallenborn JGi Evansky Pi Shannahan JHi Vallanat Bi Ledbetter AD; Schladweiler MC; Richards JHi
Gottipolu RRi Nyska A; Kodavanti UP. (2008). Subchronic inhalation of zinc sulfate induces cardiac
changes in healthy rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 232: 69"77. 191171
Walsh CR; Cupples LA; Levy D; Kiel DP; Hannan MJ Wilson PW; O'Donnell CJ. (2002). Abdominal aortic
calcific deposits are associated with increased risk for congestive heart failure: the Framingham Heart
Study. Am Heart J, 144: 733-739. 157103
Watanabe N. (2005). Decreased number of sperms and Sertoli cells in mature rats exposed to diesel exhaust as
fetuses. Toxicol Lett, 155: 51-58. 087985
Wayne LG; Chambers LA. (1968). Biological effects of urban air pollution: V a study of effects of Los Angeles
atmosphere on laboratory rodents. Arch Environ Occup Health, 16: 871-885. 038537
Weisenberger DJ; Campan M; Long TL Kim M; Woods C; Fiala E; Ehrlich M; Laird PW. (2005). Analysis of
repetitive element DNA methylation by MethyLight. Nucleic Acids Res, 33: 6823-36. 192101
Weitz JL Byrne J; Clagett GP; Farkouh ME; Porter JM; Sackett DL; Strandness DE Jr; Taylor LM. (1996).
Diagnosis and treatment of chronic arterial insufficiency of the lower extremities: a critical review.
Circulation, 94: 3026-3049. 156150
Wendelhag I; Gustavsson T; Suurkula M; Berglund G; Wikstrand J. (1991). Ultrasound measurement of wall
thickness in the carotid artery: fundamental principles and description of a computerized analysing
system. Clinical Physiol, 11: 565-577. 157135
Wendelhag I; Wiklund O; Wikstrand J. (1993). Atherosclerotic changes in the femoral and carotid arteries in
familial hypercholesterolemia. Ultrasonographic assessment of intima-media thickness and plaque
occurrence. Arterioscler Thromb Vase Biol, 13: 1404-1411. 157136
Wheeler AJ; Villeneuve P; Smith-Doiron M; Mahmud M; Dales R; Brook JR. (2006). Children's exposure to
ambient air pollution: the application of different exposure assessment methodologies. Epidemiology,
17(6): S33-S34. 103905
Wilhelm M; Ritz B. (2005). Local variations in CO and particulate air pollution and adverse birth outcomes in
Los Angeles County, California, USA. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 1212-1221. 088668
Willekes C; Brands PJ; Willigers JM; Hoeks AP; Reneman RS. (1999). Assessment of local differences in intima-
media thickness in the human common carotid artery. J Vase Res, 36: 222-228. 157147
Williams L; Ulrich C; Larson T; Wener M; Wood B; Campbell P; Potter J; McTiernan A; De Roos A. (2009).
Proximity to Traffic, Inflammation, and Immune Function among Women in the Seattle, Washington,
Area. Environ Health Perspect, 117: 373. 191945
Wilson PW; Kauppila LI; O'Donnell CJ; Kiel DP; Hannan M; Polak JM; Cupples LA. (2001). Abdominal aortic
calcific deposits are an important predictor of vascular morbidity and mortality. Circulation, 103: 1529"
1534. 156159
Wilson WE; Mage DT; Grant LD. (2000). Estimating separately personal exposure to ambient and nonambient
particulate matter for epidemiology and risk assessment: why and how. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 50:
1167-1183. 010288
Witteman JC; Kok FJ; van Saase JL; Valkenburg HA. (1986). Aortic calcification as a predictor of
cardiovascular mortality. Lancet, 2' 1120-1122. 156161
Woodruff TJ; Darrow LA; Parker JD. (2008). Air pollution and postneonatal infant mortality in the United
States, 1999-2002. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 110-5. 098386
Woodruff TJ; Grillo J; Schoendorf KC. (1997). The relationship between selected causes of postneonatal infant
mortality and particulate air pollution in the United States. Environ Health Perspect, 105: 608-612.
084271
Woodruff TJ; Parker JD; Schoendorf KC. (2006). Fine particulate matter (PM25) air pollution and selected
causes of postneonatal infant mortality in California. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 785-790. 088758
July 2009
7-154
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Xu J; Lee ET; Devereux RB; Umans JG; Bella JN; Shara NM! Yeh J; Fabsitz RR; Howard BY. (2008). A
longitudinal study of risk factors for incident albuminuria in diabetic American Indians' the Strong
Heart Study. Am J Kidney Dis, 51: 415-424. 157157
Yang AS; Estecio MR; Doshi K; Kondo Y; Tajara EH; Issa JP. (2004). A simple method for estimating global
DNA methylation using bisulfite PCR of repetitive DNA elements. Nucleic Acids Res, 32: e38. 192102
Yang C-Y; Hsieh H-J; Tsai S_S; Wu T_N; Chiu H_F. (2006). Correlation between air pollution and postneonatal
mortality in a subtropical city: Taipei, Taiwan. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 69: 2033-2040. 090760
Yang C-Y; Tseng Y"T; Chang C"C. (2003). Effects of air pollution on birthweight among children born between
1995 and 1997 in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 66: 807-816. 087886
Yatera K; Hsieh J; Hogg James C; Tranfield E; Suzuki H; Shih C"H; Behzad Ali R; Vincent R; van Eeden
Stephan F. (2008). Particulate matter air pollution exposure promotes recruitment of monocytes into
atherosclerotic plaques. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 294: H944-H953. 157162
Yauk C; Polyzos A; Rowan-Carroll A; Somers CM; Godschalk RW; Van Schooten FJ; Berndt ML; Pogribny IP;
Koturbash I; Williams A; Douglas GR; Kovalchuk O. (2008). Germ-line mutations, DNA damage, and
global hypermethylation in mice exposed to pa. Presented at . 157164
Yauk CL; Quinn JS. (1996). Multilocus DNA fingerprinting reveals high rate of heritable genetic mutation in
herring gulls nesting in an industrialized urban site. Presented at . 157163
Ying Z; Kampfrath T; Thurston G; Farrar B; Lippmann M; Wang A; Sun Q; Chen LC; Rajagopalan S. (2009).
Ambient particulates alter vascular function through induction of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species.
Toxicol Sci, l: 1-36. 190111
Yokota S; Mizuo K; Moriya N; Oshio S; Sugawara I; Takeda K. (2009). Effect of prenatal exposure to diesel
exhaust on dopaminergic system in mice. Neurosci Lett, 449: 38-41. 190518
Yoshida S; Ono N; Tsukue N; Oshio S; Umeda T; Takano H; Takeda K. (2006). In utero exposure to diesel
exhaust increased accessory reproductive gland weight and serum testosterone concentration in male
mice. , 13: 139-147. 097015
Yoshida S; Takedab K. (2004). The effects of diesel exhaust on murine male reproductive function. Eisei
Kagaku, 50: 210-4. 097760
Yoshida S; Yoshida M; Sugawara I; Takeda K. (2006). Mice strain differences in effects of fetal exposure to
diesel exhaust gas on male gonadal differentiation. , 13: 117-123. 156170
Zanobetti A; Bind MAC; Schwartz J. (2008). Particulate air pollution and survival in a COPD cohort. Environ
Health Perspect, 7: 48. 156177
Zanobetti A; Schwartz J. (2007). Particulate air pollution, progression, and survival after myocardial infarction.
Environ Health Perspect, 115: 769-775. 091247
Zeger S; Dominici F; McDermott A; Samet J. (2008). Mortality in the Medicare population and chronic exposure
to fine particulate air pollution in urban centers (2000-2005). Environ Health Perspect, 116: 1614.
191951
Zeger S; McDermott A; Dominici F; Samet J. (2007). Mortality in the medicare population and chronic exposure
to fine particulate air pollution. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 1614-1619. 157176
Zeman KL; Bennett WD. (2006). Growth of the small airways and alveoli from childhood to the adult lung
measured by aerosol-derived airway morphometry. J Appl Physiol, 100: 965-971. 157178
Zhang Z; Che W; Liang Y; Wu M; Li N; Shu Y; Liu F; Wu D. (2007). Comparison of cytotoxicity and genotoxicity
induced by the extracts of methanol and gasoline engine exhausts. Toxicol In Vitro, 21: 1058-1065.
157186
July 2009
7-155
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Chapter 8. Susceptible Subpopulations
8.1. Potentially Susceptible Subpopulations
Interindividual variation in human responses to air pollutants indicates that some
subpopulations are at increased risk for the detrimental effects of ambient exposure to PM
(Kleeberger and Ohtsuka, 2005, 130489). The NAAQS are intended to provide an adequate
margin of safety for both general populations and sensitive subpopulations, or those
subgroups potentially at increased risk for health effects in response to ambient air
pollution (see Section l.l). To facilitate the identification of subpopulations at the greatest
risk for PM-related health effects, studies have evaluated factors that contribute to the
susceptibility and/or vulnerability of an individual to PM. These terms have sometimes
been used interchangeably in the literature, and in other cases have been defined to
represent two different categories that could contribute to a subpopulation experiencing
increased risk to PM-related health effects, resulting in the lack of a clear and consistent
definition (see Table 8-1). Additionally, in some cases, "at-risk" has been used as a term
encompassing these concepts more generally.
In this ISA, the term 'susceptible' will be used to represent populations that have a
greater likelihood of experiencing health effects related to PM exposure. This increased
likelihood of response to PM can result from a multitude of factors, including genetic or
developmental factors, race, gender, age, lifestyle (e.g., smoking status and nutrition) or
preexisting disease states. Population-level susceptibility factors (e.g., socioeconomic status
[SES], which includes reduced access to health care and low educational attainment) are
also discussed within this section due to the fact their non-random distribution appears to
play a dominant role in influencing the pattern of health effects observed in response to PM
exposure (American Lung Association, 2001, 016626).
Table 8-1. Definitions of susceptible and vulnerable in the PM literature.
Definition
Reference
Susceptible: pred
Vulnerable: capal
isposed to develop a noninfectious disease
lie of being hurt: susceptible to injury or disease
Merriam-Webster (2009,192146)
Susceptible: greater likelihood of an adverse outcome given a specific exposure, in comparison with the general American Lung Association (2001, 016626)
population. Includes both host and environmental factors (e.g., genetics, diet, physiologic state, age, gender,
social, economic, and geographic attributes).
Vulnerable: periods during an individual's life when they are more susceptible to environmental exposures.
Note: Hyperlinks to the reference citations throughout this document will take you to the NCEA HERO database (Health
and Environmental Research Online) at http://epa.gov/hero. HERO is a database of scientific literature used by U.S. EPA in
the process of developing science assessments such as the Integrated Science Assessments (ISA) and the Integrated Risk
Information System (IRIS).
July 2009 8-1 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Definition
Reference
Susceptible: innate (e.g., genetic or developmental) or acquired (e.g., age, disease or smoking or smoking) factors
U.S. EPA. (2008,157072)
that make individuals more likely to experience effects with exposure to PM.
Vulnerable: PM-related effects due to factors including socioeconomic status (e.g., reduced access to health
care) or particularly elevated exposure levels.
Susceptible: greater or lesser biological response to exposure.
U.S. EPA (2009,192149)
Vulnerable: more or less exposed.
Vulnerable: to be susceptible to harm or neglect, that is, acts of commission or omission on the part of others
Adav, LA. (2001,192150)
that can wound.
Susceptible:may be those who are significantly more liable than the general population to be affected by a
U.S. EPA (2003,192145)
stressor due to life stage (e.g., children, the elderly, or pregnant women), genetic polymorphisms (e.g., the small
but significant percentage of the population who have genetic susceptibilities), prior immune reactions (e.g.,
individuals who have been "sensitized" to a particular chemical), disease state (e.g., asthmatics), or prior damage
to cells or systems (e.g., individuals with damaged ear structures due to prior exposure to toluene, making them
more sensitive to damage by high noise levels).
Vulnerable: differential exposure and differential preparedness (e.g., immunization).
Susceptible: intrinsic (e.g., age, gender, pre existing disease (e.g., asthma) and genetics) and extrinsic (previous
Kleeberger and Ohtsuka (2005,130489)
exposure and nutritional status) factors.
Susceptible:characteristics that contribute to increased risk of PM-related health effects (e.g., genetics, pre-
Pope and Dockerv (2006,156881)
existing disease, age, gender, race, socioeconomic status, healthcare availability, educational attainment, and
housing characteristics).
To examine whether PM differentially affects certain subpopulations, epidemiologic
studies conduct stratified analyses to identify the presence or absence of effect modification.
A thorough evaluation of potential effect modifiers may help identify subpopulations that
are more susceptible to PM. These analyses require the proper identification of confounders
and their subsequent adjustment in statistical models, which helps separate a spurious
association from a true causal association. Although the design of toxicological and
controlled human exposure studies do not allow for an extensive examination of effect
modifiers, the use of animal models of disease and the study of individuals with underlying
disease or genetic polymorphisms do allow for comparisons between subgroups. Therefore,
the results from these studies, combined with those results obtained through stratified
analyses in epidemiologic studies, contribute to the overall weight of evidence for the
increased susceptibility of specific subpopulations to PM.
This chapter discusses the epidemiologic, controlled human exposure, and
toxicological studies evaluated in Chapters 6 and 7 that provide information on potentially
susceptible subpopulations. The studies highlighted include only those studies that
presented stratified results (e.g., males vs. females or <65 vs. > 65). This approach allowed
for a comparison between subpopulations exposed to similar PM concentrations and within
the same study design. Although this chapter does not provide a comprehensive evaluation
of all the studies that examined the effect of PM on potentially susceptible subpopulations
it does summarize the trends in the associations or health effects observed within the
identified subpopulations. Table 8-2 provides an overview of the factors identified in the
current toxicological, controlled human exposure, and epidemiologic literature that have
been shown to contribute to the susceptibility of a subpopulation to PM-related health
effects.
July 2009
8-2
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table 8-2. Susceptibility Factors.
Factor
Exposure
PM Size Fraction Evaluated
Children (<18)16
Short-term
PM2.6, PM10-2.E
i, PM10
Older Adults (a 65)
Short-term
PM2.6, PM10-2.E
i, PM10
Long-term
PM2.6
Pregnancy and Developmental Effects
Long-term
PM2.6
Gender
Short-term
PM2.6, PM10
Long-term
PM2.6, PM10-2.E
i, PM10
Race/Ethnicity
Short-term
PM2.6, PM10
Genetic polymorphisms
Short-term
PM2.6
Long-term
PM10
Cardiovascular Diseases
Short-term
PM2.6, PM10
Long-term
PM2.6
Respiratory Illnesses
Short-term
PM2.6, PM10
Long-term
PM10
Respiratory Contributions to Cardiovascular Effects
Shot-term
PM2.6, PM10
Diabetes
Short-term
PM10
Obesity
Short-term
PM2.6
Health Status (e.g., Nutrition)
Short-term
PM2.6
Socioeconomic Status (SES)
Short-term
PM2.6, PM10-2.E
i, PM10
Educational Attainment
Short-term
PM2.6, PM10
Long-term
PM2.6
Residential Location
Short-term
PM10
8.1.1. Age
8.1.1.1. Older Adults
1 Evidence for PM-related health effects in older adults spans epidemiologic, controlled
2 human exposure, and toxicological studies. The 2004 PM AQCD found evidence for
3 increased risk of cardiovascular effects in older adults exposed to PM (U.S. EPA, 2004,
4 056905). Older adults represent a potentially susceptible subpopulation due to the higher
5 prevalence of pre-existing cardiovascular and respiratory diseases found in this age range
6 compared to younger age groups. The increased susceptibility in this subpopulation can
7 primarily be attributed to the gradual decline in physiological processes as part of the aging
8 process (U.S. EPA, 2006, 192082). Therefore, some overlap exists between potentially
9 susceptible older adults and the subpopulation that encompases individuals with pre-
15 The age range that defines a child varies from study to study. In some cases it is <21 years old while in others it is <18
years old (Firestone et al., 2007, 192071). For the purposes of this exercise children are defined as those individuals <18 years old
because the majority of epidemiologic studies consider individuals under the age of 18 children.
July 2009
8-3
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
existing diseases (Kan et al., 2008, 156621). Epidemiologic studies that conduct age
stratified analyses primarily focus on the association between short-term exposure to PM
and cardiovascular morbidity, but additional studies have examined the association
between PM and respiratory morbidity and mortality.
In recent publications, the epidemiologic evidence for cardiovascular effects in older
adults in response to short-term exposure to PM10-2.5 and PlVk.sis limited, but taken together
with evidence from studies of PM10 (e.g., Larrieu et al., 2007, 093031; Le Tertre et al., 2002,
023746), supports the increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity in older adults. Host et al.
(2007, 155851) found an increase in cardiovascular disease (CVD) hospital admissions
(HAs) in individuals >65 compared to all ages for short-term exposure to both PM10-2.5 and
PM2.5. Barnett et al. (2006, 089770) analyzed data from several cities across Australia and
New Zealand and found that the excess risk of hospitalizations for cardiac diseases,
congestive heart failure (CHF), ischemic heart disease (IHD), myocardial infarction (MI),
and all CVD was greater among patients aged > 65 as compared to those individuals <65
years in response to short-term exposure to PM2.5. U.S.-based studies that examined the
association between short-term exposure to PM and cardiovascular morbidity primarily
found no evidence for increased risk among older adults. Metzger et al. (2004, 011222)
found no evidence of effect modification by age for cardiovascular outcomes and short-term
exposure to PM2.5 in Atlanta, Georgia, which is supported by the results from other studies
that focused on short-term exposure to PM10 (Fung et al., 2005, 074322; Zanobetti and
Schwartz, 2005, 088069). However, Pope et al. (2008, 191969) observed an increased risk of
HF hospital admissions in older adults (i.e., > 65) in Utah, but the study used a 14-day
lagged cumulative moving average of PM2.5, which is much longer than the lags examined
by the other U.S.-based studies. Although studies have not consistently found an
association between short-term exposure to PM and respiratory-related health effects in
older adults, some studies have reported an increase in respiratory hospital admissions in
individuals 65 years of age and older (e.g., Fung et al., 2005, 093262).
Additional evidence for an increase in cardiovascular and respiratory effects among
older adults has been observed in controlled human exposure and dosimetric studies.
Devlin et al. (2003, 087348) found that older subjects exposed to PM2.5 concentrated
ambient particles (CAPs) experienced significant decreases in heart rate variability (HRV)
(both in time and frequency) immediately following exposure, when compared to healthy
young subjects. In addition, Gong et al (2004, 055628) reported that older subjects
demonstrated significant decreases in HRV when exposed to PM2.5 CAPs, but this study did
not compare the response in older subjects to those elicited by young, healthy individuals.
However, the study did find that healthy older adults were more susceptible to decreases in
HRV compared to those with an underlying health condition (i.e., chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease [COPD]) in response to PM exposure (Gong et al., 2004, 055628).
Dosimetric studies have shown a depression of PM2.5 and PM10-2.5 clearance in all regions of
July 2009
8-4
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
the respiratory tract with increasing age beyond young adulthood in humans and
laboratory animals. These results suggest that older adults are also susceptible to PM-
related respiratory health effects (Section 4.3.4.1).
Animal toxicological studies have attempted to characterize the relationship between
age and PM-related health effects through the development of models that mimic the
physiological conditions associated with older individuals. For example, Nadziejko et al.
(2004, 055632) observed arrhythmias in older, but not younger, rats exposed to PM2.5 CAPs.
In addition, another study (Tankersley et al., 2004, 094378) that used a mouse model of
terminal senescence observed various cardiovascular-related responses including altered
baseline autonomic tone in response to carbon black exposure that may subsequently affect
the quality and severity of cardiovascular responses (Tankersley, 2007, 188859).
Reductions in cardiac fractional shortening and significant pulmonary vascular congestion
upon exposure to carbon black were also reported in older mice (Tankersley et al., 2008,
157043). Overall, these studies provide biological plausibility for the increase in
cardiovascular effects in older adults observed in the controlled human exposure and
epidemiologic studies.
Recent epidemiologic studies have also found that individuals >65 years old are more
susceptible to all-cause (non-accidental) mortality upon short-term exposure to both PM2.5
(Franklin et al., 2007, 188502; Ostro et al., 2006, 087991) and PM10 (Samoli et al., 2008,
188455; Zeka et al., 2006, 088749), which is consistent with the findings of the 2004 PM
AQCD. Of note are the results from Ostro et al. (2006, 087991) that reported a slight
increase in mortality for older adults compared to all ages in single-pollutant models, but a
robust effect estimate in co-pollutant models with gaseous pollutants (i.e., PM2.5+CO and
PM2.5+NO2). These results differ from those in the all ages model (i.e., attenuation of the
effect estimate in co-pollutant models with CO and NO2), which suggests that older adults
are more susceptible to PM exposures, even though the age-stratified effect estimates in
single-pollutant models did not significantly differ. Epidemiologic studies that examined the
association between mortality and long-term exposure to PM (i.e., PM2.5) have found results
contradictory to those obtained in the short-term exposure studies. Villeneuve et al. (2002,
042576), Naess et al. (2007, 090736) and Zeger et al. (2008, 191951) report evidence of
differing PM2.5 relative risks by age, where risk declines with increasing age starting at age
60 until there is no evidence of an association among persons > 85 years of age.
The evidence from epidemiologic, controlled human exposure, and toxicological
studies that focused on exposures to PM2.5, PM10-2.5, and PM10, provide coherence and
biological plausibility for the association between PM and cardiovascular morbidity in older
adults. The clear pattern of positive associations only being observed in epidemiologic
studies conducted in non-U.S. locations brings into question the influence of PM
composition on health effects. However, the difference in effects observed between U.S. and
non-U.S. studies could also be due to possible differences in the identification of CVD-
July 2009
8-5
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
related morbidity and mortality between the studies evaluated. The additional evidence
from epidemiologic studies that focus on mortality and respiratory morbidity in response to
short-term exposure to PM also indicate that older adults represent a susceptible
subpopulation. As the demographics of the U.S. population shift over the next 20 years with
a larger percentage of the population (i.e., 13% of the population in 2011 and a projected
20% in 2030) encompassing individuals > 65 years (U.S. Census Bureau, 2000, 157064). an
increase in the number of PM-related health effects (e.g., cardiovascular and respiratory
morbidity, and mortality) in individuals > 65 years old could occur.
8.1.1.2. Children
Children have generally been considered more susceptible to PM exposure due to
multiple factors including more time spent outdoors, greater activity levels, exposures
resulting in higher doses per body weight and lung surface area, and the potential for
irreversible effects on the developing lung (U.S. EPA, 2004, 056905). The 2004 PM AQCD
found that studies which stratify results by age typically report associations between PM
and respiratory-related health effects in children, specifically asthma (U.S. EPA, 2004,
056905). Of the recent epidemiologic studies evaluated, only a few have examined the
association between PM10-2.5 and PM2.5 and respiratory effects in children. Mar et al. (2004,
057309) found increased respiratory effects (e.g., wheeze, cough, lower respiratory
symptoms) in children 7-12 years of age compared to individuals 20-51 years of age in
response to exposure to both PM10-2.5 and PMa.sin Spokane, Washingon. In addition, Host et
al. (2007, 155851) found an increase in respiratory-related hospital admissions with short-
term exposure to PM10-2.5 among children ages 0-14 years in 6 French cities. Further
support for these effects is provided by the results from studies that focused on PM10 (Mar
et al., 2004, 057309; Peel et al., 2005, 056305). A recent toxicological study provides
biological plausibility for the increase in PM-related respiratory effects in children observed
in the epidemiologic studies. Mauad et al. (2008, 156743) using both prenatal and
postneonatal mice exposed to ambient PM2.5 in a "polluted chamber" found evidence for
changes in lung function and pulmonary injury (e.g., incomplete alveolarization).
Additionally, Pinkerton et al. (2004, 087465; 2008, 190471) found evidence suggesting that
the developing lung is more susceptible to PM by demonstrating that neonatal rats exposed
to iron-soot PM had a reduction in cell proliferation in the lung. Overall, the evidence from
epidemiologic studies that have examined the health effects associated with all size
fractions of PM and toxicological studies that have examined individual PM components
provide additional support to the hypothesis that children are more susceptible to
respiratory effects from short-term exposure to PM.
July 2009
8-6
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
8.1.2. Pregnancy and Developmental Effects
While the majority of the literature focuses on epidemiologic studies that examine the
potential health effects (e.g., low birth weight, growth restriction) attributed to in utero
exposure to PM (see Section 7.4), it is unclear if the health effects observed are due to
soluble fractions of PM that cross the placenta or physiological alterations in the pregnant
woman. In the case of exposure to PM, adverse health effects in the offspring could be
mediated by potentially greater susceptibility in the pregnant woman. For example, an
inflammatory response leads to differential activation of multiple genes involved in immune
response and regulation, cell metabolism, and proliferation all of which can lead to health
effects in the developing fetus (Fedulov et al., 2008, 097482). Toxicological studies have
recently examined whether exposure to air pollutants during pregnancy leads to increased
allergic susceptiblity in the offspring. Fedulov et al. (2008, 097482) used an animal model
to examine the effect of diesel exhaust particles (DEPs) along with an immunologically
"inert" particle (TKb) on pregnant mice. The authors found that pregnant mice exhibited a
local and systemic inflammatory response when exposed to either DEP or Ti02, which was
not observed in control, non-pregnant mice. In addition, the offspring of exposed pregnant
mice developed AHR and allergic inflammation. This study suggests that exposure to PM2.5,
and even relatively inert particles, during pregnancy can potentially lead to increased
allergic susceptibility in offspring and susbequently the development of asthma.
8.1.3. Gender
The 2004 PM AQCD did not find consistent evidence for a difference in health effects
by gender. However, there appeared to be gender differences in the localization of particles
when deposited in the respiratory tract and the deposition rate due to differences in body
size, conductive airway size, and ventilatory parameters (U.S. EPA, 2004, 056905). For
example, females have proportionally smaller airways and slightly greater airway
reactivity than males (Yunginger et al., 1992, 192071).
Few recent epidemiologic studies have conducted gender-stratified analyses when
examining the association between either short- or long-term exposure to PMio-2.5or PM2.5.
Similar to the studies evaluated in the 2004 PM AQCD, the current literature has not found
a consistent pattern of associations by gender for any health outcome. Pope et al. (2006,
189048) observed a slightly larger, non-significant, association between short-term
exposure to PM2.5 and daily HA for acute IHD events in males. An examination of gender-
specific effects by both Ostro et al. (2006, 087991) and Franklin et al. (2007, 188502) found
conflicting associations by gender for multiple cause-specific mortality outcomes. The
inconsistency in associations between males and females is further highlighted in studies
that examined the health effects associated with long-term exposure to PM10-2.5 and PM2.5.
July 2009
8-7
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
Chen et al. (2005, 087942) found larger effects in females for congestive heart disease
(CHD) mortality upon long-term exposure to PMio a sin 3 California cities. Naess et al.
(2006, 189048). also observed slightly larger effect estimates in females for CVD and lung
cancer mortality upon long-term exposure to PM2.5, but for COPD mortality the greatest
association was found in males.
The majority of the epidemiologic studies that examined the association between
exposure to PM and gender focused on exposure to PM10. Although most of these studies do
not attribute the association to specific size fractions (i.e., PMio-2.5or PM2.5) or provide
insight as to whether one size fraction may be driving the observed effect, the studies of
PM10 provide further support that gender does not appear to differentially affect PM-related
health outcomes. Neither Zanobetti and Schwartz (2005, 088069) nor Wellenius et
al. (2006, 088748) found gender to be a significant effect modifier of the risk estimates
associated with short-term exposure to PM10 and cardiovascular hospital admissions. These
results are consistent with those found in other studies that examined the association
between short-term exposure to PM10 and both cardiovascular and respiratory hospital
admissions (Luginaah et al., 2005, 057327; Middleton et al., 2008, 156760). Additional
studies that examined the effects of short-term and long-term exposure to PM10 on
respiratory morbidity and mortality (Boezen et al., 2005, 087396; Chen et al., 2005, 087942;
Zanobetti and Schwartz, 2005, 088069; Zeka et al., 2006, 088749) found results that are
consistent with those reported in studies of PM10-2.5 and PM2.5 (i.e., gender is not likely to be
an effect modifier).
Although human clinical studies are not typically powered to detect differences in
response between males and females, one study did report significantly greater decreases in
blood monocytes, basophils, and eosinophils in females compared to males following
controlled exposures to UF EC (Frampton et al., 2006, 088665). Overall, the evidence from
primarily epidemiologic studies that examined the association between short- and long-
term exposure to PM10-2.5 and PM2.5, along with the supporting evidence from PM10 studies,
further confirms that although differences in dosimetry exist between males and females,
neither gender consistently exhibits a higher disposition for PM-related health effects.
8.1.4. RacefEthnicity
The 2004 PM AQCD did not evaluate the potential susceptibility of individuals of
different races and ethnicities to PM exposure. The results from epidemiologic studies
evaluated in this review that examined the potential effect modification of the PM-
morbidity and -mortality relationships by race and ethnicity varied depending on the study
location. In an analysis of the PM2.5-mortality relationship, Ostro et al. (2006, 087991)
stratified the association by race and ethnicity, and observed a positive and marginally
significant effect for whites and Hispanics, but not for blacks, in response to short-term
July 2009
8-8
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
exposure to PM2 .5 in 9 California counties. An additional analysis performed by Ostro et al. (2008,
097971) in 6 California counties using PM2.5 and various PM2.5 components, also found a
significant association between mortality, specifically cardiovascular mortality, and
Hispanic ethnicity (Ostro et al., 2008, 097971). It should be noted that neither study, Ostro
et al. (2006, 087991) nor Ostro et al. (2008, 097971), controlled for potential confounders
(e.g., SES factors and location of residence) of the association observed between PM2.5
exposure and Hispanic ethnicity. As a result, Ostro et al (2008, 097971) speculated that the
increased PM2.5-mortality risks observed for Hispanics could be due to a variety of factors
including, higher rates of non-high school graduates, obesity, no leisure-time activity, and
alcohol consumption within the Hispanic population in California. Additional evidence for
the potential susceptibility of individuals by race and ethnicity were derived from studies
on the health effects associated with short-term exposure to PM10. Wellenius et al. (2006,
088748) observed that race (i.e., white vs. other) did not significantly modify the association
between short-term exposure to PM10 and CHF hospital admissions. Additionally, Zeka et
al. (2006, 088749) did not observe any difference in mortality effect estimates when
stratifying by race (i.e., black and white) upon short-term exposure to PM10. To date,
dosimetric studies have not extensively examined differences in particle deposition between
races or ethnicities to confirm the epidemiologic findings. Although not extensively
analyzed, toxicological studies, have examined PM responses in different mouse and rat
strains have reported greater CV effects (Kodavanti et al., 2003, 051325; Tankersley et al.,
2007, 097910) and compromised host defense (Ohtsuka et al., 2000, 004409) for some
strains. These studies provide some support, in terms of biological plausibility, for
differences in PM-induced health effects by race or ethnicity. However, it is unclear how the
difference in the response to PM in different mouse or rat strains extrapolates to PM-
induced differences between races or ethnicities. Overall, the results from the studies that
examined the potential effect modification of PM associations by race and ethnicity provide
some evidence for increased risk of mortality in Hispanics upon short-term exposure to
PM2.5. However, the evidence for this association is from two studies conducted in
California, it is unclear if the studies adequately controlled for potential confounders, and
additional studies in other locations that stratified results by race and ethnicity have not
yet been conducted.
8.1.5. Gene-Environment Interaction
A consensus now exists that gene-environment interactions merit serious
consideration when examining the relationship between ambient exposures to air
pollutants and the development of health effects (Gilliland et al., 1999, 155792; Kauffmann
and Post Genome Respiratory Epidemiology, 2004, 090968). These potential interactions
were not evaluated in the 2004 PM AQCD. Inter-individual variation in human responses
July 2009
8-9
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
to air pollutants suggests that some subpopulations are at increased risk of detrimental
effects due to pollutant exposure, and it has become clear that the genetic makeup of an
individual can increase their susceptibility (Kleeberger and Ohtsuka, 2005, 130489).
Gene-environment interactions can result in health effects due to: genetic polymorphisms,
which result in the lack of a protein or a change that makes a functionally important
protein dysfunctional! or genetic damage in response to an exposure which potentially leads
to a health response (e.g., formation ofbenzo [a] pyrene DNAadducts in response to PM
exposure). In this review, the majority of studies examine gene-environment interactions
due to genetic polymorphisms. In order to establish useful links between polymorphisms in
candidate genes and adverse health effects, several criteria must be satisfied: the product of
the candidate gene must be significantly involved in the pathogenesis of the adverse effect
of interest! and polymorphisms in the gene must produce a functional change in either the
protein product or in the level of expression of the protein (U.S. EPA, 2008, 157075).
Further, the issue of confounding by other environmental exposures must be carefully
considered.
It has been hypothesized that the cardiovascular and respiratory health effects that
occur in response to short-term PM exposure are mediated by oxidative stress (see
Section 5.1.1). Research has examined this hypothesis by primarily focusing on the
glutathione-S transferase (GST) genes because they have common, functionally important
polymorphic alleles that significantly affect antioxidant defense function in the lung (e.g.,
homozygosity for the null allele at the GSTM1 and GSTT1 loci, homozygosity for the A105G
allele at the GSTP1 locus), and approximately half of the white population has a
polymorphic null allele, resulting a large potential study population (Schwartz et al., 2005,
086296). Exposure to free radicals and oxidants in air pollution leads to a cascade of events,
which can result in a reduction in glutathione (GSH), and an increase in the transcription
of GSTs. Individuals with genotypes that result in reduced or absent enzymatic activity are
likely to have reduced antioxidant defenses and potentially increased susceptibility to
inhaled oxidants and free radicals.
Numerous studies have examined the role of genetic polymorphisms on PM-related
cardiovascular health effects using the Normative Aging Study cohort. Schwartz et al.
(2005, 086296) and Chahine et al. (2007, 156327) found that individuals with null GSTM1
alleles had a larger decrease in HRV upon short-term exposure to PM2.5 compared to
individuals with at least one allele. Polymorphisms in the HO-1 promoter resulted in
lowered HRV upon short-term exposure to PM2.5 in individuals with the long repeat
polymorphism compared to those individuals with the short repeat polymorphism (Chahine
et al., 2007, 156327). In addition, Schneider et al. (2008, 191985) found that diabetic
individuals with null GSTM1 alleles had larger decrements in FMD (i.e., flow-mediated
dialation of the brachial artery), suggesting alterations in endothelial function. A controlled
human exposure study examined whether genetic polymorphisms increase the
July 2009
8-10
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
susceptibility of individuals to respiratory morbidity in response to PM exposure. Gilliland
et al. (2004, 156471) examined the effect of allergens and DEPs on individuals with either
null genotypes for GSTM1 and GSTT1 or GSTP1 codon 105 variants. The authors found
that individuals with the GSTM1 null or the GSTP11105 wildtype genotypes were more
susceptible to allergic inflammation upon exposure to allergen and DEPs. Additional genes
within the GST pathway have also been examined (e.g., NQOl), but the sample sizes are
relatively small, which prohibits the analysis of the potential effect modification of PM-
related health effects by these genes (e.g., Schneider et al., 2008, 191985).
The interaction between GST genes and PM exposure has recently been extended to
studies that examined the effect of PM exposure on birth outcomes. A recent study (Suh et
al., 2008, 192077) that examined the effect of high PM10 exposures during the third
trimester of pregnancy on the risk of preterm delivery, found that women with the GSTM1
null genotype were at an increased risk of preterm birth. When examining the interaction
between high PM10 concentrations during the third timester of pregnancy and the presence
of the GSTM1 null genotype on the risk of preterm delivery, there was evidence for a
synergistic gene-environment interaction in pregnant women. This effect could occur due to
oxidative stress induced by metals contained in PM10, which could be modified by
polymorphisms of the GSTM1 gene. This oxidative stress causes oxidative DNA damage in
fetal tissues, which may lead to preterm delivery by causing a reduction in placental blood
flow.
An examination of other genes outside the GST pathway have also been conducted to
determine if specific polymorphisms increase the susceptibility of individuals to PM.
Baccarelli et al. (2008, 157984) in the Normative Aging Study observed that individuals
with polymorphisms in MTHFR (C677T methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase), an
alteration associated with reduced enzyme activity, and cSHMT (cytoplasmic serine
hydroxymethyltransferase) (i.e., [CT/TT] MTHFR and [CC] cSHMT genotypes), alterations
associated with higher homocysteine levels, have a reduction in SDNN, upon exposure to
PM2.5. Peters et al. (2009, 191992) examined single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the
fibrinogen gene in myocardial infarction survivors to assess whether exposure to PM10
altered physologic levels of fibrinogen, which has been implicated in promoting
atherothrombosis. The authors found that individuals with single nucleotide
polymorphisms (SNPs) in the fibrinogen gene have higher steady state fibrinogen levels
which when combined with the inflammatory effects (i.e., increased fibrinogen levels)
associated with exposure to PM could increase their risk of PM-related cardiovascular
health effects. These results taken together suggest that individuals with null alleles or
specific polymorphisms in genes that mediate the antioxidant response to oxidative stress,
regulate enzyme activity, or regulate physiological levels of inflammatory markers are more
susceptible to PM. However, in some cases genetic polymorphisms may actually reduce an
individual's susceptibility to PM-related health effects. For example, Park et al. (2006,
July 2009
8-11
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
189099) found that individuals with two hemochromatosis (HFE) polymorphisms (C282Y
and H63D), which result in an increase in iron uptake, had smaller reductions in HRV upon
exposure to PM2.5. This effect could possibly be due to the reduction in free iron that enters
oxidation-reduction (redox) reactions and the subsequent reduction in reactive oxygen
species (ROS).
More recently studies have begun to focus on epigenetic effects associated with PM
exposure (i.e., the effect of PM on DNA methylation) due to the fact that DNA methylation
can result in gene alterations. The limited number of epidemiologic studies that examined
epigenetic effects have found some evidence that long-term exposure to PM2.5 and PM10 can
influence DNA methylation (Baccarelli et al., 2009, 188183: Tarantini et al., 2009, 192010).
Additionally, a toxicological study found some evidence of hypermethylation of
spermatogonial stem cells in response to the PM component of ambient urban air (Yauk et
al., 2008, 157164). Although epigenetic effects have been observed in response to PM
exposure in some studies additional research is needed to more accurately characterize
these associations.
Overall, the evidence suggests that specific genetic polymorphisms can potentially
increase the susceptibility of an individual to PM exposure, but protective polymorphisms
also exist, which may diminish the health effects attributed to PM exposure in some
individuals. In addition, the studies that examine genetic polymorphisms or epigenetics can
potentially provide additional information that can aid in identifying the specific pathways
and mechanisms by which PM initiates health effects.
8.1.6. Pre-Existing Disease
In 2004, the National Research Council (NRC) published a report that emphasized
the need to evaluate the effect of air pollution on susceptible and subpopulations, including
those with respiratory illnesses and cardiovascular diseases (NRC, 2004, 156814). The 2004
PM AQCD included epidemiologic evidence suggesting that individuals with pre-existing
heart and lung diseases, as well as diabetes may be more susceptible to PM exposure. In
addition, toxicological studies that used animal models of cardiopulmonary diseases and
heightened allergic sensitivity found evidence of enhanced susceptibility. More recent
epidemiologic and human clinical studies have directly examined the effect of PM on
individuals with pre-existing diseases and toxicological studies have employed disease
models to identify whether exposure to PM disproportionately effects certain
subpopulations.
8.1.6.1. Cardiovascular Diseases
The potential effect of underlying cardiovascular diseases on PM-related health
responses has been examined using epidemiologic studies that stratify effect estimates by
July 2009
8-12
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
underlying conditions or secondary diagnoses, and toxicological studies that use animal
models to mimic the physiological conditions associated with various cardiovascular
diseases (e.g., MI, ischemia, and atherosclerosis). A limited number of controlled human
exposure studies have also examined the potential relationship between cardiovascular
diseases and exposure to PM in individuals with underlying cardiovascular conditions, but
these studies have provided somewhat inconsistent evidence for these associations.
The majority of the epidemiologic literature that examined the association between
short-term exposure to PM and cardiovascular outcomes focuses on cardiovascular-related
hospital admissions and emergency department (ED) visits. Hypertension is the pre-
existing condition that has been considered to the greatest extent when examining the
association between short-term exposure to PM and cardiovascular-related HAs and ED
visits. Pope et al. (2006, 091246) found no evidence of effect modification of the IHD ED
visit association with PIVL.r, in individuals with secondary hypertension in Utah. This is
consistent with the results of both Wellenius et al. (2006, 088748) in 7 U.S. cities and Lee et
al. (2008, 192076) in Taipei, which found that hypertension did not modify the association
between PMio and cardiovascular-related health outcomes. These results differ from those
presented by Peel et al. (2007, 090442), in Atlanta, which observed that exposure to PMio
resulted in an increase in ED visits for arrhythmias and CHF in individuals with
underlying hypertension. An additional study conducted by Park et al. (2005, 057331) in
Boston found that underlying hypertension increased associations between HRV,
specifically a reduction in the HF parameter, and short-term exposure to PM2.5.
Park et al. (2005, 057331). in the analysis mentioned above, examined other
underlying cardiovascular conditions and found associations between PM2.5 and HRV in
individuals with pre-existing IHD. In a toxicological study, Wellenius et al. (2003, 055691)
examined the effects of PM2.5 CAPs exposure on induced myocardial ischemia in dogs,
which mimics the effects associated with IHD. The authors found that exposure to PM2.5
prior to the induced ischemia increased ST-segment elevation, indicating greater ischemia
than air-exposed animals. A follow-up study implicated impaired myocardial blood flow in
the response (Bartoli et al., 2009, 179904).
Additional studies examined the effects of PM on cardiac function in individuals with
dysrhythmia. Peel et al. (2007, 090442) observed some evidence for an increase in ED visits
for IHD for individuals with secondary dysrhythmia and PMio exposure. However, when
examining CHF hospital admissions in 7 U.S. cities, Wellenius et al. (2006, 088748) found
no evidence for effect modification of PMio exposure in individuals with secondary
dysrhythmia.
Limited evidence is available from epidemiologic studies that examined other pre-
existing cardiovascular conditions, such as CHF and MI. Pope et al. (2006, 091246)
observed an increase in hospital admissions for acute IHD in individuals with underlying
CHF upon short-term exposure to PM2.5. However, Peel et al. (2007, 090442) did not find that
July 2009
8-13
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
underlying CHF contributed to an increase in the association between IHD ED visits and
short-term exposure to PMio. Zanobetti and Schwartz (2005, 088069) also examined the
potential effect modification of the association between PMio and cardiovascular-related
health effects in individuals with CHF, but used MI hospital admissions as the outcome of
interest. Underlying CHF was not found to increase MI hospital admissions for exposure to
PMio in the cohort of more than 300,000 hospital admissions.
Wellenius et al. (2006, 088748) examined the effect of previous diagnoses of acute MI
on the association between CHF hospital admissions and short-term exposure to PMio in 7
U.S. cities. In this study, Wellenius et al. (2006, 088748) found no evidence of effect
modification of the relationship between PMio and CHF hospital admissions by previous
acute MI. Toxiciological studies have provided additional evidence for the cardiovascular
health effects associated with exposure to PM in individuals with underlying MI. Anselme
et al. (2007, 097084) and Wellenius et al. (2006, 156152) examined the arrhythmic effects of
PM on rats that experienced an MI using two different models. Wellenius et al. (2006,
156152) used a post-myocardium sensitivity model (acute MI) and observed that exposure
to PM2.5 CAPs decreased ventricular premature beats and spontaneous supraventricular
ectopic beats. In contrast, the MI model of chronic heart failure (i.e., rats that experienced
an MI 3 months prior to exposure), demonstrated a prominent increase in the incidence of
premature ventricular contraction when exposed to DE (Anselme et al., 2007, 097084). The
discrepancy in effects observed between studies could be due to differences in the MI model
or the PM exposure (i.e., CAPs vs. DE).
Additional toxicological studies examined the association between PM and
pre-existing cardiovascular diseases using a murine model of atherosclerosis (ApoE"'"
mouse). For example, Campen et al. (2005, 083977; 2006, 096879) examined the heart rate
and ECG effects of acute exposure to PM on ApoE"'" mice. With DE, dramatic bradycardia
and T-wave depression were observed that were attributable to the gases (Campen et al.,
2005, 083977), while whole gasoline emissions induced T-wave alterations that required
particles (Campen et al., 2006, 096879). However, these studies along with others that used
this mouse model (see Section 6.2 and 7.2) did not compare the effects observed with the
ApoE '" mouse to other non-diseased mouse models, so it is unclear if the responses would
differ if other strains underwent the same experimental protocol.
Controlled human exposure studies that examined the effect of pre-existing diseases
on cardiovascular outcomes with exposure to PM are less consistent and difficult to
interpret in the context of the results from the epidemiologic and toxicological studies. Mills
et al. (2007, 091206; 2008, 156766) investigated the effects of dilute DE, or fine and
ultrafine CAPs, respectively, on subjects with coronary artery disease and prior MI.
Exposure to dilute DE was found to promote exercise-induced ST-segment changes
indicating myocardial ischemia, as well as inhibit endogenous fibrinolytic capacity Mills et
al. (2007, 091206). The physiological responses observed in Mills et al. provides a measure
July 2009
8-14
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
of coherency with the cardiovascular effects observed in epidemiologic studies, including
increases in hospital admissions and ED visits for IHD and stroke associated with exposure
to PM. An examination of fine and ultrafine CAPs that were low in combustion derived
particles, were not found to exhibit any significant effects on vascular function (Mills et al.,
2008, 156766). Routledge et al. (2006, 088674) reported no change in HRV in a group of
adults with coronary artery disease following exposure to ultrafine carbon particles, which
may be explained in part by the use of medication (beta blockers) among the majority of the
subjects.
Although the epidemiologic studies did not examine potential effect modification of
pre-existing cardiovascular conditions on effects of long-term exposure to PM, a few
toxicological studies exposed animals with underlying cardiovascular conditions to PM for
months. In studies that focused on the cardiovascular effects following subchronic exposure
to PM in ApoE"'" mice, relatively consistent physiological effects were observed across
studies. Araujo et al. (Araujo et al., 2008, 156222) exposed mice to ultrafine CAPs and
observed enhanced size of early atherosclerotic lesions. Similarly, Chen and Nadziejko
(2005, 087219) and Sun et al. (2005, 186814; Sun et al., 2008, 157033) exposed mice to
PM2.5 CAPs with the same results. An additional long-term exposure study observed a
decreasing trend in heart rate, physical activity, and temperature along with biphasic
responses in HRV (SDNN and rMSSD) upon exposure to CAPs (Chen and Hwang, 2005,
087218).
While the majority of the literature examines the potential modification of the
association between PM and non-fatal cardiovascular health effects, a few new studies have
also examined effect modification in mortality associations. Zeka et al. (2006, 088749) found
an increase in risk estimates for associations between PM10 and mortality in individuals
with underlying stroke, while Bateson et al. (2004, 086244) found evidence for effect
modification of the PM-mortality association in individuals with CHF.
Collectively, the evidence from epidemiologic and toxicological, and to a lesser extent,
controlled human exposure studies indicates increased susceptibility of individuals with
underlying cardiovascular diseases to PM exposure. Although the evidence for some
outcomes was inconsistent across epidemiologic and toxicological studies, this could be due
to a variety of issues including the PM size fraction used in the study along with the study
location. Even with these caveats, a large proportion of the U.S. population has been
diagnosed with cardiovascular diseases (i.e., approximately 51.6 million people with
hypertension, 24.1 million with heart disease, and 14.1 million with coronary heart disease
[see Table 8-3]), and therefore represents a large subpopulation that is potentially more
susceptible to PM exposure than the general population.
July 2009
8-15
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Table 8-3. Percent of the U.S. population with respiratory diseases, cardiovascular diseases, and
diabetes.
Age
Regional
Adults (18+)*
18-44
45-64
65-74
75+
NE
MW
s
w
Chronic Condition/ Disease
Number (x 106)
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
RESPIRA TORY DISEASES
Asthma*
24.2
11.0
11.5
10.5
11.7
9.3
11.7
11.5
10.5
10.8
Asthma (< 18 yrs)
6.8*
CD
CO
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
COPD
Chronic bronchitis
9.5
4.3
2.9
5.5
5.6
6.7
3.8
4.4
4.9
3.5
Emphysema
4.1
1.8
0.3
2.4
5.0
6.4
1.4
2.3
1.9
1.6
CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
All heart disease
24.1
10.9
3.6
12.3
26.1
36.3
10.8
12.7
10.9
9.2
Coronary heart disease
14.1
6.4
0.9
7.2
18.4
25.5
6.4
7.6
6.6
4.7
Hypertension
51.6
23.4
77
32.4
52.7
53.5
22.2
23.7
25.3
20.6
Stroke
5.6
2.6
0.5
2.4
7.6
11.2
2.1
2.8
2.9
2.2
Diabetes
17.1
7.8
2.6
10.4
18.2
17.9
7.2
8.1
8.0
7.4
* All data for adults except asthma prevalence data for children under 18 years of age, from CDC (2008,156324; 2008,156325). For adults prevalence data based off
adults responding to "ever told had asthma."
Source: Pleis and Lethbridge Cejku (2007,156875); CDC (2008,156324; 2008,156325).
8.1.6.2. Respiratory Illnesses
Investigators have examined the effect of pre-existing respiratory illnesses on
multiple health outcomes (e.g., mortality, asthma symptoms, CHF) in response to exposure
to ambient levels of PM. Animal models have been developed and/or human clinical studies
conducted to examine the possible PM effects on pre-existing respiratory conditions in a
controlled setting.
Epidemiologic studies have examined the effect of short-term exposure to PM on the respiratory health of
asthmatic individuals measuring a variety of respiratory outcomes. Asthmatic individuals were found to
have an increase in medication use (Rabinovitch et al., 2006, 088031). respiratory symptoms (i.e., asthma
symptoms, cough, shortness of breath, and chest tightness (Gent et al., 2003, 052885). and asthma
symptoms (Delfino et al., 2002, 093740; 2003, 050460) with short-term exposure to PM2.5; and morning
symptoms (Mortimer et al., 2002, 030281) and asthma attacks (Desqueyroux et al., 2002, 026052) with
short-term exposure to PMi0.
Toxicological studies that have used ovalbumin-induced allergic airway disease models provide
evidence which supports the findings of the epidemiologic literature. Morishita et al. (2004, 087979) used
this model to assess the health effects of PM2.5 components. In response to a short-term exposure to CAPs
from Detroit, an area with pediatric asthma rates three times the national average, rats with allergic airway
disease were found to preferentially retain PM derived from identified local combustion sources in
association with eosinophil influx and BALF protein content after an acute exposure (Morishita et al.,
2004, 087979). These findings suggest that individuals with allergic airways conditions are more
July 2009
8-16
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
susceptible to allergic airways responses upon exposure to PM2.5, which may be partially attributed to
increased pulmonary deposition and localization of particles in the respiratory tract (Morishita et al.,
2004, 087979). An additional study (Heidenfelder et al., 2009, 190026) examined whether genes are
differentially expressed upon exposure to PM. They found that exposure to CAPs increased the
expression of genes associated with inflammation and airway remodeling in rats with allergic airway
disease. Although the evidence is much more limited, not all of the toxicological studies evaluated that
examined the effect of underlying respiratory conditions on PM-related respiratory morbidity focused on
allergic airways disease. Using an animal model of emphysema (i.e., papain-treated mice) Lopes et al.
(2009, 190430) found that papain-treated mice exposed to urban ambient PM demonstrated a statistically
significant increase in mean linear intercept, a measure of airspace enlargement, compared to saline-
treated controls exposed to filtered air. These results provide preliminary evidence, which suggests that
non-allergic respiratory morbidities may also increase the susceptibility of an individual to PM-related
respiratory effects.
The results from the epidemiologic and toxicological studies that focused on underlying allergic
airways disease is supported by a series of controlled human exposure studies which have shown that
exposure to DEPs increases the allergic inflammatory response in atopic individuals (Bastain et al., 2003,
098690; Diaz-Sanchez et al., 1997, 051247; Nordenhall et al., 2001, 025185). However, not all controlled
human exposure studies have found evidence for differences between the respiratory effects exhibited by
healthy and asthmatic individuals. Studies by Gong et al. (2003, 042106; 2004, 055628; Gong et al.,
2008, 156483) reported that healthy and asthmatic subjects exposed to coarse, fine and ultrafine CAPs,
exhibited similar respiratory responses. However, it should be noted that these studies excluded moderate
and severe asthmatics that would be expected to show increased susceptibility to PM exposure.
In addition to examining the association between exposure to PM and respiratory
effects in asthmatics, some studies examined whether individuals with COPD represent a
potentially susceptible subpopulation. Desqueyroux et al. (2002, 026052) did not observe an
increase in the exacerbation16 of COPD in response to short-term exposure to PM2.5.
However, studies that examined the effect of PM on lung function in individuals with COPD
(Lagorio et al., 2006, 089800; Trenga et al., 2006, 155209) observed declines in FEVi, and
FEVi and FVC, respectively in response to PM10 and/or PM2.5. Silkoff et al. (2005, 087471)
observed associations between PM10 and a reduction in FEVI and PM2.5 and a reduction in
PEF, in those with COPD, but only during one winter of the analysis. Only one controlled
human exposure study examined the effects of PM on COPD subjects and found no
significant difference in respiratory effects between healthy and individuals with COPD
upon exposure to PM2.5 CAPs (Gong et al., 2004, 055628). On the other hand the results
from dosimetric studies have shown that COPD patients have increased dose rates and
impaired mucociliary clearance relative to age matched healthy subjects, suggesting that
16 Desqueyroux et al. (2002, 026052) defined a COPD exacerbation as (a) decrease in "vesicular" breath sound, (b) bronchial
obstruction, (c) tachycardia or arrhythmia, or (d) cyanosis.
July 2009
8-17
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
individuals with COPD are potentially at a greater risk of PM-related health effects
(Sections 4.2.4.5 and 4.3.4.3).
A few of the epidemiologic studies examined the effect of underlying respiratory
illnesses on the association between short- and long-term exposure to PM and mortality.
Using different pre-existing respiratory illnesses, Zeka et al. (2006, 088749) and De Leon et
al. (2003, 055688) found that short-term exposure to PMio increased the risk of
non-accidental mortality for pneumonia and circulatory mortality for all respiratory
illnesses, respectively. Additionally, Zanobetti et al. (2008, 156177) observed an association
between long-term exposure to PMio and mortality in individuals that had previously been
hospitalized for COPD. Although these studies do not examine additional size fractions of
PM, together they highlight the potential effect of underlying respiratory illnesses on the
PM-mortality relationship.
Overall, the epidemiologic, controlled human exposure, and toxiciological studies
evaluated provide biological plausibility for the increased health effects observed in
epidemiologic studies among asthmatic individuals in response to PM exposure. Although,
the evidence from studies that examined associations between PM and health effects in
individuals with COPD is inconsistent, taken together individuals with COPD and asthma
represent a large percent of the U.S. population, which may be more susceptible to PM-
related health effects (Table 8-3).
8.1.6.3. Respiratory Contributions to Cardiovascular Effects
Although the majority of health effects observed in individuals with pre-existing
respiratory illnesses were associated with respiratory illness exacerbations, studies also
examined whether underlying respiratory illnesses can lead to cardiovascular effects with
PM exposure. Controlled human exposure and toxicological studies have also observed some
cardiovascular effects in individuals with pre-existing respiratory illnesses. Gong et al.
(2003, 042106) observed acute responses in the cardiovascular system and systemic
circulation among asthmatic individuals after exposure to PM2.5 CAPs. However,
respiratory disease has not consistently been observed to affect cardiovascular response in
controlled human exposure studies. In a toxicological study, Batalha et al. (2002, 088109),
using a chronic bronchitis animal model, found that the pulmonary artery lumen-to-wall
ratio was decreased in rats exposed to PM2.5 CAPs, although the induced bronchitis didn't
seem to affect the response. The majority of epidemiologic studies that examined whether
underlying respiratory illnesses contributed to the mainfestation of PM-related
cardiovascular hospital admission or ED visits, did not report increases in effects for a
variety of cardiovascular outcomes (e.g., IHD, arrhythmias, CHF, MI) for individuals with
underlying respiratory infection (Wellenius et al., 2006, 088748), pneumonia (Zanobetti and
Schwartz, 2005, 088069), or COPD (Peel et al., 2007, 090442; Wellenius et al., 2005,
087483). However, Yeatts et al. (2007, 091266), in a panel study, found evidence for
July 2009
8-18
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
cardiovascular effects, specifically reductions in HRV parameters, in asthmatic adults upon
short-term exposure to PM10-2.5. It must be noted that most of the aforementioned
epidemiologic studies focused on exposure to PM10, and, therefore, it is unclear how these
results compare to those found in the controlled human exposure and toxicological studies
that focused on exposure to PM2.5 (e.g., CAPs). Thus, it is unclear if individuals with
underlying respiratory illnesses represent a subpopulation that is potentially susceptible to
PM-related cardiovascular effects.
8.1.6.4. Diabetes and Obesity
It has been hypothesized that the systemic inflammatory cascade leads to an increase
in cardiovascular risk (Dubowsky et al., 2006, 088750). As a result, individuals with
conditions linked to chronic inflammation (i.e., diabetes and obesity), have been examined
to determine whether diabetes or obesity facilitate the manifestation of PM-mediated
health effects, and, therefore, represent a potentially susceptible subpopulation.
Epidemiologic studies have examined whether diabetes modifies the association
between cardiovascular health effects and PM exposure, but these studies have primarily
focused on short-term exposure to PM10. Time-series studies have provided evidence
through an examination of hospital admission and ED visits and mortality, which suggests
an increase in health effects in diabetic individuals in response to PM exposure. Multicity
studies have found upwards of 75% greater risk of hospitalization for cardiac diseases in
individuals with diabetes upon to exposure to PM10 (Zanobetti and Schwartz, 2002,
034821). Studies conducted in Atlanta, Georgia have also found increased risk for
cardiovascular-related ED visits in diabetics, specifically for IHD, arrhythmias, and CHF
(Peel et al., 2007, 090442). Additional studies found some evidence that individuals with
diabetes are at increased risk of mortality upon exposure to PM10 (Zeka et al., 2006,
088749) and PM2.5 (Goldberg et al., 2006, 088641). However, some studies (both multicity
and single-city) have not observed a modification of the risk of cardiovascular ED visits and
hospital admissions in response to exposure to PM10 in diabetics (Pope et al., 2006, 091246;
Wellenius et al., 2006, 088748; Zanobetti and Schwartz, 2005, 088069).
Panel and cohort studies have been conducted to determine the physiological changes
that occur in individuals with diabetes in response to PM exposure. These studies examined
both changes in inflammatory markers along with specific physiological alterations in the
cardiovascular system. Schneider et al. (2008, 191985) in a panel study of 22 individuals
with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Chapel Hill, NC found evidence that ambient exposure to
PM2.5 enhanced the reduction in various markers of endothelial function. Liu et al. (2007,
156705) observed an increase in end-diastolic FMD and end-systolic FMD, and decreases in
end-diastolic basal diameter and end-systolic basal diameter in diabetics upon exposure to
PM10. The authors also observed positive associations with FMD and blood pressure in
diabetic individuals. A controlled human exposure study conducted by Carlsten et al. (2008,
July 2009
8-19
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
156323) found that DE did not elicit any prothrombotic effects in subjects with metabolic
syndrome, which consists of physiological alterations similar to those observed in both
diabetic and obese individuals. An examination of biomarkers found mixed results, with
Liao et al. (2005, 088677) observing an increase in vWF; Liu et al. (2007, 156705) observing
an increase in TBARS, but not CRP or TNF-a! and Dubowsky et al. (2006, 088750)
observing an increase in CRP and WBCs. Overall, it is unclear how differences in each of
the aforementioned biomarkers contribute to the potential overall cardiovascular effect
observed in diabetic individuals! however, an increase in inflammation, oxidative stress,
and acute phase response may contribute to cardiovascular effects. A recent toxicological
study, also demonstrated the potential for PM-related health effects in diabetics. Sun et al.
(2009, 190487) found that PM2.5 CAPs exposure for 4 months can exaggerate insulin
resistance, visceral adiposity, and inflammation in a diet-induced obesity mouse model.
Overall, epidemiologic studies have reported evidence for increased effects in
diabetics in response to PM exposure, with preliminary evidence for physiological
alterations from toxicological studies. However, the limited evidence from toxicological and
controlled human exposure studies along with the lack of studies that examined additional
PM size fractions warrants additional research to confirm these associations and to identify
the biological pathway(s) that may result in a greater response to PM in diabetics. This
potentially susceptible subpopulation is large, with an estimated 17.1 million diabetic
individuals in the U.S. (Table 8-3).
In addition to diabetes, obesity has been examined as a health condition with the
potential to lead to an increase in PM-related health effects. Only a few recent studies have
examined the potential effect modification of PM risk estimates by obesity. Schwartz et al.
(2005, 086296) reported a change in HRV in obese (i.e., BMI > 30 kg/m2) compared to non-
obese subjects, while Dubowsky et al. (2006, 088750) observed an increase in inflammatory
markers (i.e., CRP, IL-6, and WBC) in response to short-term exposure to PM2 .5 among obese
individuals. Additionally, Schneider et al. (2008, 191985) found some evidence for a larger
reduction in FMD in individuals with a BMI >30 kg/m3 in response to PM2.5 exposure.
These effects could be due, in part, to a higher PM dose rate in obese individuals, which has
been demonstrated in children by Bennett and Zeman (2004, 155686). These investigators
also reported that tidal volume and resting minute ventilation increased with body mass
index. Although a limited amount of research has been conducted to examine PM-related
health effects in obese individuals there is an increasing trend of individuals within the
U.S. that have been defined as overweight or obese (BMI > 25.0) (56-65% between NHANES
III and NHANES [1999-2002]).
July 2009
8-20
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
8.1.7. Socioeconomic Status
Socioeconomic status (SES) is a composite measure that usually consists of economic
status, measured by income! social status measured by education! and work status
measured by occupation (Dutton and Levine, 1989, 192052). Based on data from the U.S.
Census Bureau in 2006, from among commonly-used indicators of SES, about 12% of
individuals and 11% of families are below the poverty line (U.S., 2009, 192117). Although
the measure of SES is composed of a multitude of determinants, each of these linked factors
can influence an individual's susceptibility to PM-related health effects. Additionally, low
SES individuals have been found to have a higher prevalence of pre-existing diseases!
inadequate medical treatment! and limited access to fresh foods leading to a reduced intake
of antioxidant polyunsaturated fatty acids and vitamins, which can increase this
subpopulations susceptibility to PM (Kan et al., 2008, 156621).
SES and individual determinants of SES, such as educational attainment, are not
mutually exclusive and together can influence the susceptibility of a population. Within the
U.S. approximately 16% of the population does not have a high school degree and only 27%
have a bachelor's degree or higher level of education (U.S., 2009, 192148). Educational
attainment generally coincides with an individual's income level, which is correlated to
other surrogates of SES, such as residential environment (Jerrett et al., 2004, 087379). Low
SES, and surrogates of SES such as educational attainment, have been shown in some
studies to modify health outcomes of PM exposure for a population. Franklin et al. (2008,
155779) noted an increased risk in mortality associated with short-term exposure to PM2.5
and its components for individuals with low SES while additional analyses stratified by
education level have also observed consistent trends of increased mortality for PM2.5 and
PM2.5 species for individuals with low educational attainment (Ostro et al., 2006, 087991!
Ostro et al., 2008, 097971! Zeka et al., 2006, 088749) This is further supported by a
reanalysis of the ACS cohort (Krewski et al., 2009, 191193), which found moderate evidence
for increased lung cancer mortality in individuals with a high school education or less
compared to individuals with more than a high school education in response to long-term
exposure to PM2.5.
Epidemiologic studies have also examined additional surrogates of SES, such as
residential location and nutritional status to identify their influence on the susceptibility of
a subpopulation. Jerrett et al. (2004, 087379) examined the modification of acute mortality
effects due to particulate air pollution exposure by residential location in Hamilton, Canada
using educational attainment as a surrogate for SES. The authors found that the area of
the city with the highest SES characteristics displayed no evidence of effect modification
while the area with the lowest SES characteristics had the largest health effects. Likewise,
Wilson et al. (2007, 157149) examined the effect of SES on the association between
mortality and short-term exposure to PM in Phoenix, but used educational attainment and
July 2009
8-21
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
income to represent SES. When stratifying Phoenix into central, middle, and outer rings of
varying urban density central Phoenix, the area with the lowest SES, was found to exhibit
the greatest association with PM2.5. However, the association with urban density differed
when examining PM10-2.5, with the greatest effect being observed for the middle ring.
Yanosky et al. (2008, 192081) examined whether long-term exposure to traffic-related
pollutants, using NO2 as a surrogate, varied by SES at the block group level. The authors
found higher levels of NO2 associated with lower SES areas, which suggests that lower SES
individuals are disproportionately exposed to traffic-related pollutants, which includes PM.
Nutritional deficiencies have been associated with increased susceptibility to a variety
of infectious diseases and chronic health effects. Low SES may decrease access to fresh
foods, and thus be related to nutritional deficiencies that could increase susceptibility to
PM-related health effects. Baccarelli et al. (2008, 157984) examined the association
between exposure to PM2.5 and HRV in individuals with polymorphisms in MTHFR and
cSHMT genes, which are associated with reduced enzyme activity and increased risk of
CVD. The authors found that when individuals with these genetic polymorphisms increased
their intake (above median levels) of B6, B12, or methionine no PM2.5 effect on HRV was
observed.
8.1.8. Summary
Upon evaluating the association between short- and long-term exposure to PM and various health
outcomes, studies also attempted to identify subpopulations that are more susceptible to PM. These
studies did so by: conducting stratified analyses; examining individuals with an underlying health
condition; or developing animal models that mimic the physiological conditions associated with an
adverse health effect. These studies identified a multitude of factors that could potentially contribute to
whether an individual is susceptible to PM (Table 8-2). Although studies have primarily used exposures
to PM10 or PM2 5, the available evidence suggests that the identified factors may also enhance
susceptibility to coarse fraction particles.
The majority of observations made during the evaluation of the literature reviewed in this ISA are
consistent with those reported in the 2004 PM AQCD. An evaluation of age-related health effects
suggests that older adults have heightened responses for cardiovascular morbidity with PM exposure. In
addition, epidemiologic and toxicological studies provide evidence, which indicates that children are at an
increased risk of PM-related respiratory effects. It should be noted that the health effects observed in
children could be initiated by exposures to PM that occurred during key windows of development, such as
in utero. Studies that focus on exposures during development have reported inconsistent findings (see
Section 7.4.), but a recent toxicological study suggests that inflammatory responses during pregnancy due
to exposure to PM could result in health effects in the developing fetus.
Epidemiologic studies have also examined whether additional factors, such as gender, race, or
ethnicity modify the association between PM and morbidity and mortality outcomes. Consistent with the
July 2009
8-22
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
findings of the 2004 PM AQCD, gender and race do not seem to modify the association between PM and
morbidity and mortality outcomes. However, some evidence, albeit from two studies conducted in
California, suggest that Hispanic ethnicity may modify the association between PM and mortality.
Recent epidemiologic and toxicological studies provided evidence that individuals with null alleles
or polymorphisms in genes that mediate the antioxidant response to oxidative stress (i.e., GSTM1),
regulate enzyme activity (i.e., MTHFR and cSHMT), or regulate physiological levels of inflammatory
markers (i.e., fibrinogen) are more susceptible to PM exposure. However, some studies have shown that
polymorphisms in genes (e.g., HFE) can have a protective effect upon PM exposure. Additionally,
preliminary evidence suggests that PM exposure can impart epigenetic effects (i.e., DNA methylation),
however, these require further investigation.
Collectively, the evidence from epidemiologic and toxicological, and to a lesser extent, controlled
human exposure studies indicate increased susceptibility of individuals with underlying cardiovascular
diseases and respiratory illnesses, specifically asthma, to PM exposure. Additional controlled human
exposure and toxicological studies provide some evidence for increased PM-related cardiovascular effects
in individuals with underlying respiratory health conditions. However, the results are not consistent with
epidemiologic studies, resulting in the need for further investigation.
Recently studies have begun to examine the influence of preexisting chronic inflammatory
conditions, such as diabetes and obesity, on PM-related health effects. These studies have found some
evidence for increased associations for cardiovascular outcomes along with physiological alterations in
markers of inflammation, oxidative stress, and acute phase response. However more research is needed to
thoroughly examine the effect of PM exposure on obese individuals and to identify the biological
pathway(s) that could lead to increased susceptibility of diabetic and obese individuals to PM.
There is also evidence that socioeconomic status (SES), measured using surrogates such as
educational attainment or residential location, modifies the association between PM and morbidity and
mortality outcomes. In addition, nutritional status, another surrogate of SES, has been shown to have
protective effects against PM exposure in individuals that have a higher intake in some vitamins and
nutrients.
Overall, the epidemiologic, controlled human exposure, and toxicological studies evaluated in this
review provide evidence for increased susceptibility for various subpopulations. Although the level of
evidence varies depending on the factor being evaluated collectively, it can be concluded that some
subpopulations are more susceptible than the general population.
July 2009
8-23
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Chapter 8 References
Aday LA. (2001). At Risk in America- The Health and Health Care Needs of Vulnerable Populations in the
United States . San Francisco, CA- Jossey-Bass, Inc. 192150
American Lung Association. (2001). Urban air pollution and health inequities' A workshop report. Environ
Health Perspect, 3: 357-374. 016626
Anselme Fi Loriot S; Henry J-P; Dionnet Fi Napoleoni J-Gi Thnillez Ci Morin J-P. (2007). Inhalation of diluted
diesel engine emission impacts heart rate variability and arrhythmia occurrence in a rat model of chronic
ischemic heart failure. Arch Toxicol, 81: 299-307. 097084
Araujo JAi Barajas Bi KLeinman Mi Wang X; Bennett BJi Gong KWi Navab Mi Harkema Ji Sioutas Ci Lusis AJi
Nel AE. (2008). Ambient particulate pollutants in the ultrafine range promote early atherosclerosis and
systemic oxidative stress. Circ Res, 102: 589-596. 156222
Baccarelli Ai Martinelli Ii Pegoraro Vi Melly Si Grillo Pi Zanobetti Ai Hou Li Bertazzi PAi Mannucci PMi
Schwartz J. (2009). Living near Major Traffic Roads and Risk of Deep Vein Thrombosis. Circulation, x: x.
188183
Baccarelli Ai Martinelli Ii Zanobetti Ai Grillo Pi Hou LFi Bertazzi PAi Mannucci PMi Schwartz J. (2008).
Exposure to Particulate Air Pollution and Risk of Deep Vein Thrombosis. Arch Intern Med, 168: 920-927.
157984
Barnett AGi Williams GMi Schwartz Ji Best TLi Neller AHi Petroeschevsky ALi Simpson RW. (2006). The
effects of air pollution on hospitalizations for cardiovascular disease in elderly people in Australian and
New Zealand cities. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 1018-1023. 089770
Bartoli CRi Wellenius GAi Coull BAi Akiyama Ii Diaz EAi Lawrence Ji Okabe Ki Verrier RLi Godleski JJ.
(2009). Concentrated ambient particles alter myocardial blood flow during acute ischemia in conscious
canines. Environ Health Perspect, 117: 333-337. 179904
Bastain TMi Gilliland FDi Li Y"Fi Saxon Ai Diaz-Sanchez D. (2003). Intraindividual reproducibility of nasal
allergic responses to diesel exhaust particles indicates a susceptible phenotype. Clin Immunol, 109: 130-
136. 098690
Batalha JRi Saldiva P Hi Clarke RWi Coull BAi Stearns RCi Lawrence Ji Murthy GGi Koutrakis Pi Godleski JJ.
(2002). Concentrated ambient air particles induce vasoconstriction of small pulmonary arteries in rats.
Environ Health Perspect, 110: 1191-1197. 088109
Bateson TFi Schwartz J. (2004). Who is sensitive to the effects of particulate air pollution on mortality? A case-
crossover analysis of effect modifiers. Epidemiology, 15: 143-149. 086244
Bennett WDi Zeman KL. (2004). Effect of body size on breathing pattern and fine-particle deposition in children.
J Appl Physiol, 97: 821-826. 155686
Boezen HMi Vonk JMi Van Der Zee SCi Gerritsen Ji Hoek Gi Brunekreef Bi Schouten JPi Postma DS. (2005).
Susceptibility to air pollution in elderly males and females. Eur Respir J, 25: 1018-1024. 087396
Campen MJi Babu NSi Helms GAi Pett Si Wernly Ji Mehran Ri McDonald JD. (2005). Nonparticulate
components of diesel exhaust promote constriction in coronary arteries from ApoE -/- mice. Toxicol Sci,
88: 95-102. 083977
Campen MJi McDonald JDi Reed MDi Seagrave J. (2006). Fresh gasoline emissions, not paved road dust, alter
cardiac repolarization in ApoE-/- mice. Cardiovasc Toxicol, 6: 199-210. 096879
Carlsten Ci Kaufman JDi Trenga CAi Allen Ji Peretz Ai Sullivan JH. (2008). Thrombotic markers in metabolic
syndrome subjects exposed to diesel exhaust. Inhal Toxicol, 20: 917-921. 156323
CDC. (2008). Table 3-1: Current Asthma Population Estimates, in thousands by Age, United States: National
Health Interview Survey, 2006. Retrieved , from . 156324
CDC. (2008). Table 4-1: Current Asthma Prevalence Percents by Age, United States: National Health Interview
Survey, 2006. Retrieved , from . 156325
Chahine Ti Baccarelli Ai Litonjua Ai Wright ROi Suh Hi Gold DRi Sparrow Di Vokonas Pi Schwartz J. (2007).
Particulate air pollution, oxidative stress genes, and heart rate variability in an elderly cohort. Environ
Health Perspect, 115: 1617-1622. 156327
Note: Hyperlinks to the reference citations throughout this document will take you to the NCEA HERO database (Health
and Environmental Research Online) at http://epa.gov/hero. HERO is a database of scientific literature used by U.S. EPA in
the process of developing science assessments such as the Integrated Science Assessments (ISA) and the Integrated Risk
Information System (IRIS).
July 2009
8-24
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Chen LC; Hwang JS. (2005). Effects of subchronic exposures to concentrated ambient particles (CAPs) in mice
IV Characterization of acute and chronic effects of ambient air fine particulate matter exposures on
heart-rate variability. Inhal Toxicol, 17: 209-216. 087218
Chen LC; Nadziejko C. (2005). Effects of subchronic exposures to concentrated ambient particles (CAPs) in mice
V CAPs exacerbate aortic plaque development in hyperlipidemic mice. Inhal Toxicol, 17- 217-224. 087219
Chen LH; Knutsen SF; Shavlik D; Beeson WL; Petersen F; Ghamsary M; Abbey D. (2005). The association
between fatal coronary heart disease and ambient particulate air pollution- Are females at greater risk?.
Environ Health Perspect, 113: 1723-1729. 087942
De Leon SF; Thurston GD; Ito K. (2003). Contribution of respiratory disease to nonrespiratory mortality
associations with air pollution. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 167: 1117-1123. 055688
Delfino RJ; Gone H; Linn WS; Pellizzari ED; Hu Y. (2003). Asthma symptoms in Hispanic children and daily
ambient exposures to toxic and criteria air pollutants. Environ Health Perspect, 111: 647-656. 050460
Delfino RJ; Zeiger RS; Seltzer JM; Street DH; McLaren CE. (2002). Association of asthma symptoms with peak
particulate air pollution and effect modification by anti"inflammatory medication use. Environ Health
Perspect, 110: A607-A617. 093740
Desqueyroux H; Pujet J-C; Prosper M; Squinazi F; Momas I. (2002). Short-term effects of low-level air pollution
on respiratory health of adults suffering from moderate to severe asthma. Environ Res, 89: 29"37. 026052
Devlin RB; Ghio AJ; Kehrl H; Sanders G; Cascio W. (2003). Elderly humans exposed to concentrated air
pollution particles have decreased heart rate variability. Eur Respir J, 40: 76S-80S.. 087348
Diaz-Sanchez D; Tsien A; Fleming J; Saxon A. (1997). Combined diesel exhaust particulate and ragweed
allergen challenge markedly enhances human in vivo nasal ragweed-specific IgE and skews cytokine
production to a T helper cell 2"type pattern. J Immunol, 158: 2406-2413. 051247
Dubowsky SD; Suh H; Schwartz J; Coull BA; Gold DR. (2006). Diabetes, obesity, and hypertension may enhance
associations between air pollution and markers of systemic inflammation. Environ Health Perspect, 114:
992-998. 088750
Dutton DB; Levine S. (1989). Overview, methodological critique, and reformulation. In JP Bunker; DS Gomby;
BH Kehrer (Ed.),Pathways to health (pp. 29"69). Menlo Park, CA: The Henry J. Kaiser Family
Foundation. 192052
Fedulov AV; Leme A; Yang Z; Dahl M; Lim R; Mariani TJ; Kobzik L. (2008). Pulmonary exposure to particles
during pregnancy causes increased neonatal asthma susceptibility. , 38: 57"67. 097482
Firestone M; Moya J; Cohen-Hubal E; Zartarian V; Xue J. (2007). Identifying childhood age groups for exposure
assessments and monitoring. Risk Anal, 27: 701-714. 192071
Frampton MW; Stewart JC; Oberdorster G; Morrow PE; Chalupa D; Pietropaoli AP; Frasier LM; Speers DM;
Cox C; Huang LS; Utell MJ. (2006). Inhalation of ultrafine particles alters blood leukocyte expression of
adhesion molecules in humans. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 51-58. 088665
Franklin M; Koutrakis P; Schwartz J. (2008). The role of particle composition on the association between PM2.5
and mortality. Epidemiology, 19: 680-689. 155779
Franklin M; Zeka A; Schwartz J. (2007). Association between PM2.5 and all-cause and specific-cause mortality
in 27 US communities. , 17: 279-87. 188502
Fung KY; Luginaah I; Gorey KM; Webster G. (2005). Air pollution and daily hospital admissions for
cardiovascular diseases in Windsor, Ontario. Can J Public Health, 96: 29"33. 074322
Fung KY; Luginaah IKMG; Webster G. (2005). Air pollution and daily hospitalization rates for cardiovascular
and respiratory diseases in London, Ontario. Int J Environ Stud, 62: 677-685. 093262
Gent JF; Triche EW; Holford TR; Belanger K; Bracken MB; Beckett WS; Leaderer BP. (2003). Association of
low-level ozone and fine particles with respiratory symptoms in children with asthma. JAMA, 290: 1859"
1867. 052885
Gilliland FD; Li YF; Saxon A; Diaz-Sanchez D. (2004). Effect of glutathione-S-transferase Ml and PI genotypes
on xenobiotic enhancement of allergic responses: randomised, placebo-controlled crossover study. Lancet,
363: 119-125. 156471
Gilliland FD; McConnell R; Peters J; Gong Jr H. (1999). A Theoretical Basis for Investigating Ambient Air
Pollution and Children's Respiratory Health. Environ Health Perspect, 107: 403-407. 155792
Goldberg MS; Burnett RT; Yale JF; Valois MF; Brook JR. (2006). Associations between ambient air pollution
and daily mortality among persons with diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Environ Res, 100: 255-267.
088641
Gong H Jr; Linn WS; Terrell SL; Clark KW; Geller MD; Anderson KR; Cascio WE; Sioutas C. (2004). Altered
heart-rate variability in asthmatic and healthy volunteers exposed to concentrated ambient coarse
particles. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 335-343. 055628
July 2009
8-25
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Gong H Jr; Linn WS; Clark KW; Anderson KR; Sioutas C; Alexis NE; Cascio WE; Devlin RB. (2008). Exposures
of healthy and asthmatic volunteers to concentrated ambient ultrafine particles in Los Angeles. Inhal
Toxicol, 20: 533-545. 156483
Gong H Jri Linn WS; Sioutas C', Terrell SL; Clark KW; Anderson KR; Terrell LL. (2003). Controlled exposures of
healthy and asthmatic volunteers to concentrated ambient fine particles in Los Angeles. Inhal Toxicol,
15: 305-325. 042106
Heidenfelder BL; Reif DM; Harkema JR; Cohen Hubal EA; Hudgens EE; Bramble LA; Wagner JG; Morishita M;
Keeler GJ; Edwards SW; Gallagher JE. (2009). Comparative microarray analysis and pulmonary changes
in brown norway rats exposed to ovalbumin and concentrated air particulates. Toxicol Sci, 108- 207-221.
190026
Host S; Larrieu S; Pascal L; Blanchard M; Declercq C; Fabre P; Jusot JF; Chardon B; Le Tertre A; Wagner V;
Prouvost H; Lefranc A. (2007). Short-term Associations between Fine and Coarse Particles and
Cardiorespiratory Hospitalizations in Six French Cities. Occup Environ Med. 155851
Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Brook J; Kanaroglou P; Giovis C; Finkelstein N; Hutchison B. (2004). Do socioeconomic
characteristics modify the short term association between air pollution and mortality? Evidence from a
zonal time series in Hamilton, Canada. J Epidemiol Community Health, 58- 31-40. 087379
Kan H; London SJ; Chen G; Zhang Y; Song G; Zhao N; Jiang L; Chen B. (2008). Season, sex, age, and education
as modifiers of the effects of outdoor air pollution on daily mortality in Shanghai, China- The Public
Health and Air Pollution in Asia (PAPA) Study. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 1183-1188. 156621
Kauffmann F; Post Genome Respiratory Epidemiology Group. (2004). Post-genome respiratory epidemiology: a
multidisciplinary challenge. Eur Respir J, 24: 471-480. 090968
Kleeberger SR; Ohtsuka Y. (2005). Gene-particulate matter-health interactions. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 207:
S276-S281. 130489
Kodavanti UP; Moyer CF; Ledbetter AD; Schladweiler MC; Costa DL; Hauser R; Christiani DC; Nyska A.
(2003). Inhaled environmental combustion particles cause myocardial injury in the Wistar Kyoto rat.
Toxicol Sci, 71: 237-245. 051325
Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi Y; Turner MC; Pope AC IIL Thurston G; Calle EE;
Thun MJ. (2009). Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking
particulate air pollution and mortality. Health Effects Institute. Cambridge, MA. 140. 191193
Lagorio S; Forastiere F; Pistelli R; Iavarone I; Michelozzi P; Fano V; Marconi A; Ziemacki G; Ostro BD. (2006).
Air pollution and lung function among susceptible adult subjects: a panel study. ,5: 11. 089800
Larrieu S; Jusot J-F; Blanchard M; Prouvost H; Declercq C; Fabre P; Pascal L; Le Tertre A; Wagner V; Riviere
S; Chardon B; Borelli D; Cassadou S; Eilstein D; Lefranc A. (2007). Short term effects of air pollution on
hospitalizations for cardiovascular diseases in eight French cities: The PSAS program. Sci Total Environ,
387: 105-112. 093031
Le Tertre A; Medina S; Samoli E; Forsberg B; Michelozzi P; Boumghar A; Vonk JM; Bellini A; Atkinson R; Ayres
JG; Sunyer J; Schwartz J; Katsouyanni K. (2002). Short term effects of particulate air pollution on
cardiovascular diseases in eight European cities. J Epidemiol Community Health, 56: 773-779. 023746
Lee IM; Tsai SS; Ho CK; Chiu HF; Wu TN; Yang CY. (2008). Air pollution and hospital admissions for
congestive heart failure: are there potentially sensitive groups?. Environ Res, 108: 348-353. 192076
Liao D; Heiss G; Chinchilli VM; Duan Y; Folsom AR; Lin HM; Salomaa V. (2005). Association of criteria
pollutants with plasma hemostatic/inflammatory markers: a population-based study. J Expo Sci Environ
Epidemiol, 15: 319-328. 088677
Liu L; Ruddy TD; Dalipaj M; Szyszkowicz M; You H; Poon R; Wheeler A; Dales R. (2007). Influence of personal
exposure to particulate air pollution on cardiovascular physiology and biomarkers of inflammation and
oxidative stress in subjects with diabetes. J Occup Environ Med, 49: 258-265. 156705
Lopes FD; Pinto TS; Arantes-Costa FM; Moriya HT; Biselli PJ; Ferraz LF; Lichtenfels AJ; Saldiva PH; Mauad
T; Martins MA. (2009). Exposure to ambient levels of particles emitted by traffic worsens emphysema in
mice. Environ Res, 109: 544-551. 190430
Luginaah IN; Fung KY; Gorey KM; Webster G; Wills C. (2005). Association of ambient air pollution with
respiratory hospitalization in a government designated "area of concern": the case of Windsor, Ontario.
Environ Health Perspect, 113: 290-296. 057327
Mar TF; Larson TV; Stier RA; Claiborn C; Koenig JQ. (2004). An analysis of the association between respiratory
symptoms in subjects with asthma and daily air pollution in Spokane, Washington. Inhal Toxicol, 16:
809-815. 057309
Mauad T; Rivero DH; de Oliveira RC; Lichtenfels AJ; Guimaraes ET; de Andre PA; Kasahara DI; Bueno HM;
Saldiva PH. (2008). Chronic exposure to ambient levels of urban particles affects mouse lung
development. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 178: 721-728. 156743
July 2009
8-26
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Merriam-Webster. (2009). Merriam-Webster on-line- httpV/www.merriam-webster.com/medical/sussceptible,
httpV/merriam-webster.com/medical/vulerable. Retrieved 15-JUN-09, from httpV/www.merrian-
webster.com/medical/. 192146
Metzger KB; Tolbert PE; Klein M; Peel JL; Flanders WD; Todd KH; Mulholland JA; Ryan PB; Frumkin H.
(2004). Ambient air pollution and cardiovascular emergency department visits. Epidemiology, 15- 46"56.
044222
Middleton N; Yiallouros P; Kleanthous S; Kolokotroni O; Schwartz J; Dockery DW! Demokritou P; Koutrakis P.
(2008). A 10-year time-series analysis of respiratory and cardiovascular morbidity in Nicosia, Cyprus' the
effect of short-term changes in air pollution and dust storms. , 7- 39. 156760
Mills NL; Robinson SD; Fokkens PH; Leseman DL; Miller MR; Anderson D; Freney EJ; Heal MR; Donovan RJ;
Blomberg A; Sandstrom T; MacNee W; Boon NA; Donaldson K; Newby DE; Cassee FR. (2008). Exposure
to concentrated ambient particles does not affect vascular function in patients with coronary heart
disease. Environ Health Perspect, 116- 709-715. 156766
Mills NL; Tornqvist H; Gonzalez MC; Vink E; Robinson SD; Soderberg S; Boon NA; Donaldson K; Sandstrom T;
Blomberg A; Newby DE. (2007). Ischemic and thrombotic effects of dilute diesel-exhaust inhalation in
men with coronary heart disease. , 357- 1075-1082. 091206
Morishita M; Keeler G; Wagner J; Marsik F; Timm E; Dvonch J; Harkema J. (2004). Pulmonary retention of
particulate matter is associated with airway inflammation in allergic rats exposed to air pollution in
urban Detroit. Inhal Toxicol, 16- 663-674. 087979
Mortimer KM; Neas LM; Dockery DW; Redline S; Tager IB. (2002). The effect of air pollution on inner-city
children with asthma. Eur Respir J, 19- 699-705. 030281
Nadziejko C; Fang K; Narciso S; Zhong M; Su WC; Gordon T; Nadas A; Chen LC. (2004). Effect of particulate
and gaseous pollutants on spontaneous arrhythmias in aged rats. Inhal Toxicol, 16- 373-380. 055632
Naess O; Nafstad P; Aamodt G; Claussen B; Rosland P. (2007). Relation between concentration of air pollution
and cause-specific mortality- four-year exposures to nitrogen dioxide and particulate matter pollutants in
470 neighborhoods in Oslo, Norway. Am J Epidemiol, 165- 435-443. 090736
Nordenhall C; Pourazar J; Ledin M"C; Levin J-O; Sandstrom T; Adelroth E. (2001). Diesel exhaust enhances
airway responsiveness in asthmatic subjects. Eur Respir J, 17- 909-915. 025185
NRC. (2004). Research priorities for airborne particulate matter- IV Continuing research progress. National
Academies Press . Washington, DC. 156814
Ohtsuka Y; Brunson KJ; Jedlicka AE; Mitzner W; Clarke RW; Zhang L"Y; Eleff SM; KLeeberger SR. (2000).
Genetic linkage analysis of susceptibility to particle exposure in mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol, 22- 574"
581. 004409
Ostro B; Broadwin R; Green S; Feng W"Y; Lipsett M. (2006). Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in nine
California counties: results from CALFINE. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 29"33. 087991
Ostro BD; Feng WY; Broadwin R; Malig BJ; Green RS; Lipsett MJ. (2008). The impact of components of fine
particulate matter on cardiovascular mortality in susceptible subpopulations. Occup Environ Med, 65:
750-756. 097971
Park SK,O'Neill MS,Wright RO,Hu H,Vokonas PS,Sparrow D,Suh H,Schwartz J. (2006). HFE Genotype,
Particulate Air Pollution, and Heart Rate Variability: A Gene-Environment Interaction. Circulation, 114:
2798-2805. 189099
Park SK; O'Neill MS; Vokonas PS; Sparrow D; Schwartz J. (2005). Effects of air pollution on heart rate
variability: The VA normative aging study. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 304-309. 057331
Peel JL; Metzger KB; Klein M; Flanders WD; Mulholland JA; Tolbert PE. (2007). Ambient air pollution and
cardiovascular emergency department visits in potentially sensitive groups. Am J Epidemiol, 165: 625"
633. 090442
Peel JL; Tolbert PE; Klein M; Metzger KB; Flanders WD; Knox T; Mulholland JA; Ryan PB; Frumkin H. (2005).
Ambient air pollution and respiratory emergency department visits. Epidemiology, 16: 164-174. 056305
Peters A; Greven S; Heid I; Baldari F; Breitner S; Bellander T; Chrysohoou C; Illig T; Jacquemin B; Koenig W.
(2009). Fibrinogen Genes Modify the Fibrinogen Response to Ambient Particulate Matter. Am J Respir
Crit Care Med, 179: 484-491. 191992
Pinkerton KE; Zhou Y; Teague SV; Peake JL; Walther RC; Kennedy IM; Leppert VJ; Aust AE. (2004). Reduced
lung cell proliferation following short-term exposure to ultrafine soot and iron particles in neonatal rats:
key to impaired lung growth?. Inhal Toxicol, l: 73-81. 087465
Pinkerton KE; Zhou Y; Zhong C; Smith KR; Teague SV; Kennedy IM; Menache MG. (2008). Mechanisms of
particulate matter toxicity in neonatal and young adult rat lungs. Health Effects Institute. Boston, MA.
135. 190471
Pleis JR; Lethbridge-Cejku M. (2007). Summary health statistics for US adults: National Health Interview
Survey, 2006. CDC. Maryland. 156875
July 2009
8-27
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Pope C> Renlund D; Kfoury A; May H; Home B. (2008). Relation of heart failure hospitalization to exposure to
fine particulate air pollution. , 102- 1230-1234. 191969
Pope CA, 3rd,Muhlestein JB,May HT,Renlund DG,Anderson JL,Horne BD. (2006). Ischemic heart disease
events triggered by short-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. , 114- 2443"8. 189048
Pope CA; Dockery DW. (2006). Health effects of fine particulate air pollution- Lines that connect. J Air Waste
Manag Assoc, 56: 709-742. 156881
Pope CA IIL Muhlestein JB; May HT; Renlund DG; Anderson JL; Home BD. (2006). Ischemic heart disease
events triggered by short-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. Circulation, 114: 2443-2448.
091246
Rabinovitch N; Strand M; Gelfand EW. (2006). Particulate levels are associated with early asthma worsening in
children with persistent disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 173: 1098-1105. 088031
Routledge HC; Manney S; Harrison RM; Ayres JG; Townend JN. (2006). Effect of inhaled sulphur dioxide and
carbon particles on heart rate variability and markers of inflammation and coagulation in human
subjects. Heart, 92: 220-227. 088674
Samoli E; Peng R; Ramsay T; Pipikou M; Touloumi G; Dominici F; Burnett R; Cohen A; Krewski D; Samet J.
(2008). Acute effects of ambient particulate matter on mortality in Europe and North America: results
from the APHENA study. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 1480. 188455
Schneider A; Neas L; Herbst M; Case M; Williams R; Cascio W', Hinderliter A; Holguin F; Buse J; Dungan K.
(2008). Endothelial dysfunction: associations with exposure to ambient fine particles in diabetic
individuals. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 1666. 191985
Schwartz J; Park SK; O'Neill MS; Vokonas PS; Sparrow D; Weiss S; Kelsey K. (2005). Glutathione-S-transferase
Ml, obesity, statins, and autonomic effects of particles: gene-by-drug-by-environment interaction. Am J
Respir Crit Care Med, 172: 1529-1533. 086296
Silkoff PE; Zhang L; Dutton S; Langmack EL; Vedal S; Murphy J; Make B. (2005). Winter air pollution and
disease parameters in advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease panels residing in Denver,
Colorado. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 115: 337-344. 087471
Suh YJ; Ha EH; Park H; Kim YJ; Kim H; Hong YC. (2008). GSTM1 polymorphism along with PM10 exposure
contributes to the risk of preterm delivery. , 656: 62"67. 192077
Sun Q; Wang A; Jin X; Natanzon A; Duquaine D; Brook RD; Aguinaldo J-GS; Fayad ZA; Fuster V; Lippmann M;
Chen Lung C; Rajagopalan S. (2005). Long-term air pollution exposure and acceleration of
atherosclerosis and vascular inflammation in an animal model. , 294: 3003-3010. 186814
Sun Q; Yue P; Deiuliis JA; Lumeng CN; Kampfrath T; Mikolaj MB; Cai Y; Ostrowski MC; Lu B; Parthasarathy
S; Brook RD; Moffatt-Bruce SD; Chen LC; Rajagopalan S. (2009). Ambient air pollution exaggerates
adipose inflammation and insulin resistance in a mouse model of diet-induced obesity. Circulation, 119:
538-546. 190487
Sun Q; Yue P; Kirk RI; Wang A; Moatti D; Jin X; Lu B; Schecter AD; Lippmann M; Gordon T; Chen LC;
Rajagopalan S. (2008). Ambient air particulate matter exposure and tissue factor expression in
atherosclerosis. Inhal Toxicol, 20: 127-137. 157033
Tankersley CG,Bierman A,Rabold R. (2007). Variation in heart rate regulation and the effects of particle
exposure in inbred mice. Inhal Toxicol, 19: 621-9. 188859
Tankersley CG; Bierman A; Rabold R. (2007). Variation in heart rate regulation and the effects of particle
exposure in inbred mice. , 19: 621-9. 097910
Tankersley CG; Campen M; Bierman A; Flanders SE; Broman KW; Rabold R. (2004). Particle effects on heart-
rate regulation in senescent mice. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 381-390. 094378
Tankersley CG; Champion HC; Takimoto E; Gabrielson K; Bedja D; Misra V; El-Haddad H; Rabold R; Mitzner
W. (2008). Exposure to inhaled particulate matter impairs cardiac function in senescent mice. Am J
Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol, 295: R252-263. 157043
Tarantini L; Bonzini M; Apostoli P; Pegoraro V; Bollati V; Marinelli B; Cantone L; Rizzo G; Hou L; Schwartz J;
Bertazzi PA; Baccarelli A. (2009). Effects of particulate matter on genomic DNA methylation content and
iNOS promoter methylation. Environ Health Perspect, 117: 217-222. 192010
Trenga CA; Sullivan JH; Schildcrout JS; Shepherd KP; Shapiro GG; Liu LJ; Kaufman JD; Koenig JQ. (2006).
Effect of particulate air pollution on lung function in adult and pediatric subjects in a Seattle panel
study. , 129: 1614-22. 155209
U.S. Census. (2009). Educational Attainment in the United States: 2007
(http://www.census.gov/prod/2009pubs/p20-560.pdf). U.S. Cenus Bureau, Economics and Statistics
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. Washington, DC. P20-560.
http://www.census.gov/prod/2009pubs/p20-560.pdf. 192148
U.S. Census. (2009). U.S. Census (2000)Poverty. Retrieved 01-JUL-09, from
http://www.census.gov/hhes/www.porvety/hispov/hstpov2.html. 192147
July 2009
8-28
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
U.S. EPA. (2003). Framework for cumulative risk assessment. National Center for Environmental Assessment,
Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC.
EPA/630/P-02/001F. 192145
U.S. EPA. (2009). Susceptible subpopulations. Retrieved 15"MAY"09, from
http '//www. epa.gov/nerl/goals/health/populations. html. 192149
U.S. Census Bureau PIO. (2000). Census Bureau proiects doubling of nation's population by 2100. Retrieved ,
from . 157064
U.S. EPA. (2004). Air quality criteria for particulate matter. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Research
Triangle Park, NC. EPA/600/P-99/002aF-bF. 056905
U.S. EPA. (2006). Aging and Toxic Response: I ssues Relevant to Risk Assessment (Final). U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. Washington, DC.httpV/cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?deid=156648. 192082
U.S. EPA. (2008). Integrated review plan for the national ambient air quality standards for particulate matter.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Center for
Environmental Assessment. Research Triangle Park, NC. 157072
U.S. EPA. (2008). Integrated Science Assessment for Sulfur Oxides?Health Criteria. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. Research Triangle Park, NC. 157075
Villeneuve PJ; Goldberg MS; Krewski D; Burnett RT; Chen Y. (2002). Fine particulate air pollution and all-
cause mortality within the Harvard six-cities study- variations in risk by period of exposure. Ann
Epidemiol, 12: 568-576. 042576
Wellenius GA; Bateson TF; Mittleman MA; Schwartz J. (2005). Particulate air pollution and the rate of
hospitalization for congestive heart failure among medicare beneficiaries in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Am J Epidemiol, 161: 1030-1036. 087483
Wellenius GA; Coull BA; Batalha JRF; Diaz EA; Lawrence J; Godleski JJ. (2006). Effects of ambient particles
and carbon monoxide on supraventricular arrhythmias in a rat model of myocardial infarction. Inhal
Toxicol, 18: 1077-1082. 156152
Wellenius GA; Coull BA; Godleski JJ; Koutrakis P; Okabe K; Savage ST. (2003). Inhalation of concentrated
ambient air particles exacerbates myocardial ischemia in conscious dogs. Environ Health Perspect, 111:
402-408. 055691
Wellenius GA; Schwartz J; Mittleman MA. (2006). Particulate air pollution and hospital admissions for
congestive heart failure in seven United States cities. Am J Cardiol, 97: 404-408. 088748
Wilson WE; Mar TF; Koenig JQ. (2007). Influence of exposure error and effect modification by socioeconomic
status on the association of acute cardiovascular mortality with particulate matter in Phoenix. J Expo Sci
Environ Epidemiol, 17: S11-S19. 157149
Yanosky JD; Schwartz J; Suh HH. (2008). Associations between measures of socioeconomic position and chronic
nitrogen dioxide exposure in Worcester, Massachusetts. , 71: 1593-1602. 192081
Yauk C; Polyzos A; Rowan-Carroll A; Somers CM; Godschalk RW; Van Schooten FJ; Berndt ML; Pogribny IP;
Koturbash I; Williams A; Douglas GR; Kovalchuk O. (2008). Germ-line mutations, DNA damage, and
global hypermethylation in mice exposed to particulate air pollution in an urban/industrial location. ,
105: 605-610. 157164
Yeatts K; Svendsen E; Creason J; Alexis N; Herbst M; Scott J; Kupper L; Williams R; Neas L; Cascio W', Devlin
RB; Peden DB. (2007). Coarse particulate matter (PM25-10) affects heart rate variability, blood lipids,
and circulating eosinophils in adults with asthma. Environ Health Perspect, 115: 709-714. 091266
Yunginger JW; Reed CE; O'Connell EJ; Melton LJ 3rd; O'Fallon WM; Silverstein MD. (1992). A community-
based study of the epidemiology of asthma. Incidence rates, 1964-1983. , 146: 888-894. 192074
Zanobetti A; Bind MAC; Schwartz J. (2008). Particulate air pollution and survival in a COPD cohort. Environ
Health Perspect, 7: 48. 156177
Zanobetti A; Schwartz J. (2002). Cardiovascular damage by airborne particles: are diabetics more susceptible?.
Epidemiology, 13: 588-592. 034821
Zanobetti A; Schwartz J. (2005). The effect of particulate air pollution on emergency admissions for myocardial
infarction: Amulticity case-crossover analysis. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 978-982. 088069
Zeger S; Dominici F; McDermott A; Samet J. (2008). Mortality in the Medicare population and chronic exposure
to fine particulate air pollution in urban centers (2000-2005). Environ Health Perspect, 116: 1614-1619.
191951
Zeka A; Zanobetti A; Schwartz J. (2006). Individual-level modifiers of the effects of particulate matter on daily
mortality. Am J Epidemiol, 163: 849-859. 088749
July 2009
8-29
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Chapter 9. Welfare Effects
9.1. Introduction
This chapter is a synthesis and evaluation of the most policy-relevant science used to
help form the scientific foundation for review of the secondary (welfare-based) NAAQS
aimed at protecting against welfare effects of ambient airborne PM. Specifically Chapter 9
assesses the effects of atmospheric PM on the environment, including: (a) effects on
visibility! (b) effects on climate! (c) ecological effects! and (d) effects on materials. These
sections initially highlight the conclusions from the 2004 PM AQCD (U.S. EPA, 2004,
056905). followed by an evaluation of recent publications and assessment of the expanded
body of evidence. In some sections, few new publications are available, and the discussion is
primarily a brief overview of the key conclusions from the previous review.
As discussed in Chapter 1, the effects of particulate NOx and SOx have recently been
evaluated in the ISA for Oxides of Nitrogen and Sulfur - Ecological Criteria (U.S. EPA,
2008, 157074). That ISA focused on the effects from deposition of gas- and particle-phase
pollutants related to ambient NOx and SOx concentrations that can lead to acidification
and nutrient enrichment, as well as on the potential for increased mercury methylation
from SO r deposition. Thus, emphasis in this document is placed on the effects of airborne
PM on visibility and climate, and on the deposition effects of PM constituents other than
NOx and SOx, primarily metals and carbonaceous compounds.
Chapter 2 of this assessment provides an integrative overview of the major welfare
effects evaluated. EPA's framework for causality, described in Chapter 1, is applied
throughout the evaluation and the causal determinations are highlighted.
Note- Hyperlinks to the reference citations throughout this document will take you to the NCEA HERO database (Health
and Environmental Research Online) at http7/epa.gov/hero. HERO is a database of scientific literature used by U.S. EPA in
the process of developing science assessments such as the Integrated Science Assessments (ISA) and the Integrated Risk
Information System (IRIS).
July 2009
9-1
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
9.2. Effects on Visibility
9.2.1. Introduction
In recent years, most visibility research involved characterizing visibility conditions
and trends over broad regional scales, improving the understanding of the atmospheric
processes and pollutants responsible for the regional impacts, and attribution of visibility-
impairing pollutants to emission sources, source types, and regions. The motivation for
much of this work has come from the visibility protection provisions of the 1977 Clean Air
Act Amendments (CAAA) that called for the development of regulations to address
reduction of regional haze in 156 national parks and wilderness areas to natural conditions,
and from the subsequent RHR (RHR) promulgated in 1999 by EPA in response to the CAA
mandate. Implementation of the RHR entails planned emissions reductions to reach
natural haze conditions in these protected areas by 2064 in six ten-yr planning steps.
Haze conditions caused solely by PM from natural sources are generally much lower
than contemporary conditions. The largest difference is between natural and current
conditions for the inorganic salts ammonium sulfate and ammonium nitrate, with natural
concentrations taken to be just a few tenths of a |u,g/m3 each (Trijonis et al., 1990, 157058),
while current conditions of both over large regions of the country are an order of magnitude
or more larger (DeBell, 2006, 156388). However, natural source PM can be substantial on
an episodic basis for crustal mineral PM components during high windblown dust
conditions and for carbonaceous PM from biogenic combustion during wildfire and
prescribed burning episodes. The need for information to generate RHR implementation
plans has resulted in extensive use of continental-scale air quality simulation modeling and
assessment of expanded ambient monitoring data sets.
Unlike the substantial remote-area visibility investigations that have been conducted
in response to the RHR, relatively little work on urban visibility effects has been done in
recent years. For example, there has been relatively little new research on the optical and
human perceptual aspects of atmospheric visibility over the last decade or more. These
topics have been the subjects of numerous earlier investigations that have been
summarized in detail elsewhere (U.S. EPA, 1979, 157065; Latimer and Ireson, 1980,
035723; Middleton, 1952, 016324; Tombach and McDonald, 2004, 157054; Trijonis et al.,
July 2009
9-2
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1990, 157058; Watson et al., 2002, 035623), including past criteria documents on PM, SO2
and NOx (U.S. EPA, 1982, 017610; U.S. EPA, 1993, 017649; U.S. EPA, 2004, 056905).
In spite of this fact, the understanding of urban visibility conditions has continued to
improve. By applying a well established algorithm that relates PM and haze conditions to
data currently collected from routine filter-based PM chemical speciation monitors located
in numerous urban areas (Jayanty, 2003, 156605). and to data collected from the more
recently deployed high time- and size-resolved PM speciation monitors located in several
cities such as those in the PM Supersites program (Solomon and Hopke, 2008, 156997)
urban visibility conditions can be better characterized. Comparisons between urban and
remote area data in the same region afford the opportunity to differentiate between
regional and local visibility impacts. The availability of better size and time resolution PM
composition data, compared to that available from the routine monitoring programs,
reduces the number of simplifying assumptions required to estimate visibility conditions in
these areas, thereby reducing the uncertainty of the estimates. Thus, the state of the
science supporting urban visibility assessments continues to improve.
The background section below contains an overview of long-available information to
help provide context to the more recently published literature summarized in subsequent
sections.
9.2.2. Background
Air pollution-induced visibility impairment is caused by the loss of image-forming
light (i.e., signal) and the addition of non-image forming light (i.e., noise) between an
observer and the object being viewed. These changes to the light reaching the observer are
a result of light being scattered and absorbed by particles and gases in the sight path (see
the schematic in Figure 9-1). Electromagnetic theory developed to characterize the
interaction of light with matter (Mie, 1908, 155983) permits the calculation of light
scattering and absorption by particles and gas molecules where the index of refraction and
shape of particles by size are known (Van de Hulst, 1981, 191972).
The ability of human observers to visually detect distant objects or identify changes in
their appearance depends on the apparent contrast of the object against its background.
The apparent contrast is affected by changes in the transparency of the atmosphere caused
by air pollution as well as factors not related to air quality such as length of the sight path,
scenic lighting and the physical characteristics of the viewed object and other elements of
July 2009
9-3
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
the scene. To rigorously determine the perceived visual effects of changes in the optical
properties of the atmosphere requires the use of radiative transfer modeling to determine
changes in light from the field of view experienced by the observer, followed by the use of
psychophysical modeling to determine the response to the light by the eye-brain system.
The complexity of such an approach discourages its common use.
Atmospheric light extinction is a fundamental atmospheric optics metric used to
characterize air pollution impacts on visibility. It is the fractional loss of intensity in a light
beam per unit distance due to scattering and absorption by the gases and particles in the
air. Light extinction (bext) can be expressed as the sum of light scattering by particles (/)-,/,),
scattering by gases (bs,g), absorption by particles (hn,) and absorption by gases (baJ. Light
extinction and its components are expressed in units of inverse length, typically either
inverse kilometers (km1) or, as will be the convention in this document, inverse
megameters (Mm1). Traditionally, for visibility-protection applications, the most sensitive
portion of the spectrum for human vision (550 11m) has been used to characterize light
extinction and its components.
July 2009
9-4
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
• Sunlight (Sun Angla)
• Cloud Cover (Overcast, Puffy, etc.)
• Skv
Image-forming
• Sunlight (Sun Angle)
• Cloud Cover (Overcast,
• Skv -A
Image-forming
Image-forming
light absorbed
Optical Characteristics of Illumination
Characteristics of Observer
Optical Characteristics of
tlcal Characteristics of
Intervenl
Viewed Target
• Color
• Contrast Detail (Texture)
• Form
• Brightness
• Detection Thresholds
• Psychological Response to
Incoming Light
• Value Judgements
Light from clouds
scattered Into
sight path y
• Light Added to Sight Path by
Particles and Gases
• Image-Forming Light Subtracted
from Sight Path by Scattering
and Absorption
light scattered /
out of sight path
si
Sunlight J0
scattered Ught ref)ected
from ground
scattered into
Source: Malm (1999, 026037).
Figure 9-1. Important factors involved in seeing a scenic vista are outlined. Image-forming
information from an object is reduced (scattered and absorbed) as it passes through the
atmosphere to the human observer. Air light is also added to the sight path by
scattering processes. Sunlight, light from clouds, and ground-reflected light all impinge
on and scatter from particulates located in the sight path. Some of this scattered light
remains in the sight path, and at times it can become so bright that the image
essentially disappears. A final important factor in seeing and appreciating a scenic vista
are the characteristics of the human observer.
A parametric analysis has shown that a constant fractional change in light extinction
results in a similar perceptual change regardless of baseline conditions (Pitchford et al.,
1990, 156871). From this assessment, the deciview haze index, which is a log
transformation of light extinction, similar in many ways to the decibel index for acoustic
measurements, was developed (Pitchford and Malm, 1994, 044922). A one deciview (ldv)
change is about a 10% change in light extinction, which is a small change that is detectable
for sensitive viewing situations. The haze index in deciview units is an appropriate metric
for expressing the extent of haze changes where the perceptibility of the change is an issue.
The RHR has adopted the deciview haze index as the metric for tracking long-term haze
July 2009 9-5 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
trends of visibility-protected federal lands (EPA, 2001, 157068). Light extinction and its
components are more useful metrics for characterizing the apportionment of haze to its
pollutant components due to the approximately linear relationship between pollutant
species concentrations and their contributions to light extinction.
July 2009
9-6
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
starlight
absorbed
moonlight
scattering
by particles
starlight
scattered
urban light pollution
particle
forward
scatter
wildlife
affected by
unnaturally
bright
nighttime
sky
observer in a non-urban setting
reflective cloud
reflective cloud
starlight
absorbed
particle
side
scatter
moonlight f
scattering
by panicles
starlight
scattered I
bright urban nighttime sky
/ particle
forward
scatter
Figure 9-2. Schematic of remote-area (top) and urban (bottom) nighttime sky visibility showing the
effects of PM and light pollution.
Daytime visibility has dominated the attention of those who have studied the
visibility effects of air pollution, though nighttime visibility is also known to be affected by
air pollution. Stargazing is a popular human activity in urban and remote settings. The
July 2009
9-7
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
reduction in visibility of the night sky is primarily dependent on the addition of light into
the sight path, the brightness of the night sky and the reduction in contrast of stars against
the background (see the schematic in Figure 9-2). These are controlled by the addition of
PM, which enhances scattering, and the addition of anthropogenic sources of light.
Scattering of anthropogenic light contributes to the "skyglow" within and over populated
areas, adding to the total sky brightness. The visual result is a reduction of the number of
visible stars and the disappearance of diffuse or subtle phenomena such as the Milky Way.
The extinction of starlight is a secondary and minor effect also caused by increased
scattering and absorption. Anthropogenic light sources include artificial outdoor lighting,
which varies dramatically across space. Natural sources include the Moon, planets, and
stars that have a predictable rhythm across time.
The nighttime visual environment has some important differences to note. Light
sources and ambient conditions are typically five to seven orders of magnitude dimmer at
night than in sunlight. Moonlight, like sunlight, introduces light throughout an observer's
sight path at a constant angle. On the other hand, dim starlight emanates from all over the
celestial hemisphere while artificial lights are concentrated in cities and illuminate the
atmosphere from below. Sight paths are often inclined upward at night as targets may be
nearby terrain features or celestial phenomena. Extinction behaves the same at night as
during the day, lowering the contrast of scenes through scattering and absorption!
nevertheless the different light sources will yield variable changes in visibility as compared
to what has been established for the daytime scenario. Little research has been conducted
on nighttime visibility. Even if the air quality-visibility interactions are shown to be similar
between day and night settings, the human psychophysical response at night is expected to
differ. Though recent advances in the ability to instrument and quantify nighttime scenes
(Duriscoe et al., 2007, 156411) have been made and can be utilized to evaluate nocturnal
visibility, the state of the science is not yet comparable to that associated with daytime
visibility impairment. The remainder of this document focuses exclusively on daytime
visibility.
9.2.2.1. l\lon-PM Visibility Effects
Light extinction due to the gaseous components of the atmosphere is relatively well
understood and well estimated for any atmospheric conditions. Absorption of visible light by
gases in the atmosphere is primarily by NO2, and can be directly and accurately estimated
July 2009
9-8
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
from NO2 concentrations by multiplying by the absorption efficiency. Scattering by gases is
described by the Rayleigh scattering theory. Rayleigh scattering occurs in a pollution-free
atmosphere as a result of light scattering by the gas molecules that compose the
atmosphere (i.e., N2, O2, CO2, etc.) and depends only on the density of the atmosphere, with
highest values at sea level (~12 Mm1) and diminishing with elevation (8 Mm1 at ~4 km),
and varies somewhat at any elevation due to atmospheric temperature and pressure
variations. Rayleigh scattering can be accurately determined for any elevation and
meteorological conditions.
NO2 absorbs more light in the short wavelength blue portion of the spectrum than at
longer wavelengths. For this reason a plume or layer of NO2 removes more of the blue light
from the scene viewed through the layer giving a yellow or brown appearance to the layer
or plume. This filtering of blue light by NO2 can deepen the brown appearance of hazes over
urban areas, although it is not the sole cause of such discoloration (EPA, 1993, 017649). The
photopic-weighted absorption efficiency at the 550 nm wavelength is incorporated into the
revised version of the algorithm for estimating light extinction from aerosol data that is
used for implementing the RHR (Pitchford et al., 2007, 098066). However, NO2 is not
routinely measured at any of the monitoring sites representing visibility protected areas
where its impacts are assumed to be inconsequential compared to those of PM. At
background concentrations NO2 absorption is generally less than five percent of the light
scattering by clean air (Rayleigh scattering), making it unperceivable. Plume visibility
models are available to assess both achromatic and discoloration associated with NO2 light
absorption, for point source emissions (Latimer and Ireson, 1980, 035723! Seigneur et al.,
1984, 156965).
9.2.2.2. PM Visibility Effects
Particle light extinction is more complex than that caused by gaseous components.
PM is responsible for most visibility impairment except under near-pristine conditions,
where Rayleigh scattering is the largest contributor to light extinction or in plumes of
combustion sources that are well-controlled for particulate emissions (e.g., coal-fired power
plants with bag houses), where light absorption by NO2 may dominate the light extinction.
Light-absorbing carbon (e.g., DE soot and smoke) and some crustal minerals are the
only commonly occurring airborne particle components that absorb light. All particles
scatter light, and generally particle light scattering is the largest of the four light extinction
July 2009
9-9
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
components. While a larger particle scatters more light than a similar shaped smaller
particle of the same composition, the light scattered per unit of mass concentration (i.e.,
mass scattering efficiency in units of Mm Vljig/m3] which reduces to m2/g) is greatest for
particles with diameters from ~0.3-1.0 pm. If the index of refraction, particle shape and
concentration as a function of particle size are well characterized, Mie theory can be used to
accurately calculate the light scattering and absorption by those particles. However, it is
rare that these particle properties are known, so assumptions are used in place of missing
information to develop a simplified calculation scheme that provides an estimate of the
particle light extinction from available data sets.
Particles composed of water soluble inorganic salts (i.e., ammoniated sulfate,
ammonium nitrate, sodium chloride, etc.) are hygroscopic in that they absorb water as a
function of relative humidity to form a liquid solution droplet. Aside from the chemical
consequences of this water growth, the droplets become larger when relative humidity
increases, resulting in increased light scattering. Hence, the same PM dry concentration
produces more haze. Figure 9-3 shows the effect of water growth as a function of relative
humidity on light scattering for two size distributions of ammonium nitrate and ammonium
sulfate particles as well as for internal and external mixtures (i.e., mixed within the same
particle and in separate particles, respectively) of the two components. This
figure illustrates a number of important points. The water growth effect is substantial with
an increase in light scattering by about a factor of ten between 40% and 97% relative
humidity for the same dry particle concentrations. The amount of scattering is significantly
dependent on the dry particle size distribution. However the growth curves for ammonium
sulfate, ammonium nitrate and mixtures of the two particle components are similar at any
of the dry particle size distributions. Water growth curves are also available for sodium
chloride, the major component in sea salt, which is an important PM component at coastal
locations.
July 2009
9-10
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
0.1
c
0)
'o
*-l—
Q)
O
o
O)
c
*1—
QJ
ro
o
CO
0.01
0.001
i—'—i—->—i—'—i—'—i—'—i—'—r
NHjNOj
- (NH4)2SO„
External Mixture
(55.5% nitrate + 44.5% sulfate) d/;
o Internal mixture
(0.3 (im, 1.5}^ ar/..-
40
50
(0.6 Mm, 1.5)
-JL-
60
70
% RH
80 90 100
Source: Tang (1996,157042).
Figure 9-3. Effect of relative humidity on light scattering by mixtures of ammonium nitrate and
ammonium sulfate.
Using Mie theory, the scattering and absorption of any wavelength of light by a
particle of known size and index of refraction (a function of the wavelength of light) can be
calculated (Van de Hulst, 1981, 191972). Particle density is used to convert the particle
light extinction to its mass extinction efficiency (i.e., the ratio of particle light extinction to
its mass). To expand the calculations from one particle at a time to the multitude of
particles in ambient aerosol, information about the aerosol size and composition
distributions are needed. Aerosol mixture refers to how the major components that make up
the particles are mixed. Methods have been developed to treat simple mixture models
ranging from external mixtures where the various components are assumed to be in
separate particles, to multi-component mixtures where individual particles contain several
components (Ouimette and Flagan, 1982, 025047). The latter includes internally mixed
particles where two or more components are mixed within the particles, and layered aerosol
with a core of one component covered by a shell of another component.
The Mie theory solution for an external mixture can be simplified to a linear
relationship where the light extinction is the sum of the mass concentration of each species
July 2009
9-11
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
multiplied by its specific mass extinction efficiency (Ouimette and Flagan, 1982, 025047).
This formulation promotes the concept of apportioning the light extinction among the
various PM species. For internally mixed aerosol, the light extinction response to adding or
removing mass of any component to the aerosol is dependent on how such changes would
affect the particle size, density and index of refraction distribution of the aerosol. However,
a number of investigators have shown that the differences among the calculated light
extinction values using external and various internal mixture assumptions are generally
less than about 10% (Lowenthal et al., 1995, 045134; Ramsey, 1966, 013946; Sloane, 1983,
025039; Sloane, 1984, 025040; Sloane, 1986, 045954; Sloane and Wolff, 1985, 045953; Wolff,
1985, 044680). This provides a basis to accept the apportionment of light extinction to the
PM components calculated using an external mixture assumption as a meaningful
surrogate for their contributions.
Ambient aerosols are usually a complex and unknown combination of both internal
and external mixtures of the particle components. Despite these complexities, PM light
scattering can be accurately calculated for any relative humidity if the chemical
composition as a function of dry particle size is known (Hand et al., 2002, 190367; Malm
and Pitchford, 1997, 002519). However, most routinely available ambient monitoring
programs do not include data with sufficient detail to make such calculations. The
IMPROVE network with its greater than 150 remote area monitoring sites (DeBell, 2006,
156388) and the CSN (Jayanty, 2003, 156605) with its greater than 150 urban area
monitoring sites collect 24-h duration fine particle samples (PM2.5) that are analyzed for the
major PM components including SO42 , nitrate, and carbonaceous particulate. CSN also
analyzes for ammonium ion, but does not monitor coarse mass (PM10-2.5), while IMPROVE
measures coarse mass but does not analyze for ammonium ion. Neither data set has
sufficient size resolution to make Mie theory calculations of light extinction, nor does either
program routinely monitor NO2 concentrations, which would be required to calculate its
contribution to light extinction by absorption.
A simple algorithm similar in form to the linear equation that results from Mie theory
applied with an external mixture assumption is frequently used to estimate light extinction
from the concentrations of the major components. The concentration of each of the major
aerosol components is multiplied by a dry extinction efficiency value and for the hygroscopic
components (e.g., ammoniated sulfate and ammonium nitrate) an additional multiplicative
term to account for the water growth to estimate that components contribution to light
July 2009
9-12
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
extinction. Both the dry extinction efficiency and water growth terms are developed by
some combination of empirical assessment and theoretical calculation using typical particle
size distributions associated with each of the major aerosol components, and they are
evaluated by comparing the algorithm estimates of light extinction with coincident optical
measurements. Summing the contribution of each component gives the estimate of total
light extinction. The most commonly used of these is referred to as the IMPROVE algorithm
because it was developed specifically to use the IMPROVE aerosol monitoring data and was
evaluated using IMPROVE optical measurements at the subset of sites that make those
measurements (Malm et al., 1994, 044920). The formula for the traditional IMPROVE
algorithm is shown below.
hex, ~ 3 x f (RH) x [Sulfate]
+ 3 x /(RH) x [Nitrate]
+ 4 x [Organic Mass]
+ 10 x [Elemental Carbon]
+ 1 x [Fine Soil]
+ 0.6 x [("oarse Mass]
+ 10
Equation 9-1
Light extinction (bext) is in units of Mm"1, the mass concentrations of the components
indicated in brackets are in pg/m3, and f(RH) is the unitless water growth term that
depends on relative humidity. The dry extinction efficiency for particulate organic mass is
larger than those for particulate SOr and nitrate principally because the density of the dry
inorganic compounds are higher than that assumed for the PM organic mass components.
Since IMPROVE does not include ammonium ion monitoring, the assumption is made that
all S042- is fully neutralized ammonium sulfate and all nitrate is assumed to be ammonium
nitrate. Though often reasonable, neither assumption is always true (see Section 9.2.3.1). In
the eastern U.S. during the summer there is insufficient ammonia in the atmosphere to
neutralize the SOr fully. Fine particle nitrates can include sodium or calcium nitrate,
which are the fine particle fraction of generally much coarser particles due to nitric acid
interactions with sea salt at near-coastal areas (sodium nitrate) or nitric acid interactions
with calcium carbonate in crustal aerosol (calcium nitrate). Despite the simplicity of the
algorithm, it performs reasonably well and permits the contributions to light extinction
July 2009
9-13
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
from each of the major components (including the water associated with the SOr and
nitrate compounds) to be separately approximated.
The f(RH) terms inflate the particulate SO r and nitrate light scattering for high
relative humidity conditions. For relative humidity below 40% the f(RH) value is 1, but it
increases to 2 at -66%, 3 at -83%, 4 at -90%, 5 at -93% and 6 at -95% relative humidity.
The result is that both particulate SO r and nitrate are more efficient per unit mass than
any other aerosol component for relative humidity above -85% where its total light
extinction efficiency exceeds the 10m2/g associated with EC. Based on this algorithm,
particulate SO r and nitrate are estimated to have comparable light extinction efficiencies
(i.e., the same dry extinction efficiency and f(RH) water growth terms), so on a per unit
mass concentration basis at any specific relative humidity they are treated as equally
effective contributors to visibility effects. The strong relationship demonstrated between
dry light scattering and fine PM mass concentration or ambient light extinction and fine
PM mass concentration under low relative humidity conditions noted by a number of
investigators (Charlson et al., 1968, 095355; Chow et al., 2002, 037784; Chow et al., 2002,
036166; McMurry, 2000, 081517; Samuels et al., 1973, 070601; Waggoner and Weiss, 1980,
070152; Waggoner et al., 1981, 095453) is reasonable based on this algorithm when the PM
fractional composition is either relatively constant or varies most among PM components
with similar dry extinction efficiency values (e.g., SO42~, nitrate and organic mass
efficiencies).
9.2.2.3. Direct Optical Measurements
Light extinction and its components (i.e., scattering and absorption by particles and
gases) can be determined directly by optical measurements using commercially available
instruments (Trijonis et al., 1990, 157058). Though these measurements are all wavelength
dependent, the convention for visibility monitoring purposes is to make measurement at or
near 550iim, which is the wavelength of maximum eye response. Direct PM light extinction,
scattering and absorption measurements offer a number of advantages compared to
estimates using an algorithm applied to PM speciation data. The direct optical
measurements are considered more accurate because they do not depend on the assumed
particle characteristics (e.g., size, shape, density, component mixture, etc.) thought to be
associated with the major PM species. Also the optical measurements are made with high
time resolution (e.g., minutes to hourly) compared with the filter composition based
July 2009
9-14
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
estimates that are typically 24-h duration, allowing the former to better characterize sub-
daily temporal patterns which can help in identifying influential source categories and
characterize atmospheric phenomenon. The higher time resolution attainable with direct
light extinction measurements are also more commensurate than the 24-h light extinction
estimates from PM samples with the short exposure time associated with perceived
visibility effects.
Path-averaged light extinction can be determined by long-path transmissometers that
monitors the intensity of light that has traversed a know distance from a known initial
intensity light source. Transmission (i.e., the ratio of the final to the initial light intensity)
is the natural logarithm of the product of the path-averaged light extinction and the
distance the light has traversed. Transmissometer path-length establishes the useful range
of light extinction over which the measurements can be accurately measured, with path-
lengths of 10km or more required for pristine conditions and less than 1km more
appropriate for hazier situations or to measure the visibility impacts associated with fogs or
precipitation events. The NP Service operated long-path transmissometers at up to 25
locations from 1986 through 2004 (DeBell, 2006, 156388), but have more recently
discontinued their use at all but one remote area location due to the cost of maintenance
and the difficulties of performing calibration. Transmissometers are currently in routine
service at five urban areas.
A number of instruments measure the light scattered by particles and gases from a
source of known intensity. These include forward scattering, back scattering, polar, and
integrating nephelometers. Of these the integrating nephelometers with its high sensitivity
and sample control options has been more widely used for air quality-related visibility and
PM monitoring purposes, while the robust design of the open air forward scattering
instruments have seen extensive use by the National Weather Service (NWS) Automated
Surface Observing System (ASOS) for characterizing visibility principally for
transportation safety purposes (NOAA, 1998). The potential utility of the ASOS visibility
network at about 900 locations for air quality monitoring has been established, but the lack
of resolution in the reported data is a serious impediment to this use of the data (Richards
et al„ 1996, 190476).
Integrating nephelometers draw air into a sample chamber, making it possible to
modify the sample either by changing its humidity or controlling the particle size range
that is measured. This feature makes it possible to use sample-controlled nephelometers to
July 2009
9-15
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
investigate the effects of ambient PM size and water growth characteristic on light
scattering (Covert et al., 1972, 072055; Rood et al., 1987, 046397; Malm and Day, 2001,
190431). For instance the coarse particle contribution to light scattering can be estimated
using a nephelometer that alternately samples through a 2.5pm size selective inlet and a
10pm size selective inlet. For routine monitoring, integrating nephelometers are typically
either used to measure the PM component of light scattering when operated at ambient
relative humidity or to measure dry PM light scattering as a high-time resolution surrogate
for PM mass concentration when operated with a heater or other sample air drier.
Integrating nephelometers operated at ambient conditions by the IMPROVE program have
replaced the long-path transmissometer as the principal optical measurement at about 30
locations (DeBell, 2006, 156388).
PM light absorption can also be inferred from measured changes in the light
transmitted through a filter used to sample the PM compared to an identical clean filter
(Bond et al., 1999, 156281). Such measurements can be made subsequent to sampling
(Campbell et al., 1995, 190171) or continuously during sampling by using specifically
designed sampler (Hansen et al., 1982, 190368; Hansen et al., 1984, 002396). All of the
filter-based methods require adjustments to the optical measurements to account for filter
and sampled particle light scattering effects associated with particles concentrated on and
within the matrix of the filters (Bond et al., 1999, 156281). Often PM light absorption
measurements are used to infer BC concentration by assuming it is the dominant PM
contributor to light absorption with a near constant absorption efficiency (Allen et al., 1999,
048923; Babich et al., 2000, 156239). In fact commercially available aethalometers
incorporate an absorption efficiency value so they can directly report BC concentrations.
Like nephelometers, commercially available aethalometers can be obtained with either
single or multiple-wavelength measurement capabilities, where the multi-wavelength data
can be used to better characterize the PM. More recently these have been used to
distinguish BC that absorbs light strongly over the full visible light spectrum (e.g., DE)
from brown carbon that absorbs appreciably more at shorter wavelengths than at long
wavelengths (e.g., WS) (Andreae and Gelencser, 2006, 156215).
Other approaches to measure light absorption include a photoacoustic instrument
that measures the heating associated with absorbed light by suspended PM (Arnott et al.,
1999, 020650; Moosmiiller et al., 1998, 192073), as well as by the difference between light
extinction and light scattering measurements (Bond et al., 1999, 156281).
July 2009
9-16
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
9.2.2.4. Value of Good Visual Air Quality
The term visual air quality (VAQ) is used here to refer to the visibility effects caused
solely by air quality conditions. For example, it excludes the reduced visibility caused by
fog. Two broadly different approaches have traditionally been used to define and quantify
the value of good VAQ. One approach assesses the monetary value associated with visibility
changes! the other assesses the psychological value of visual air quality. With respect to the
latter, reduced VAQ is considered an environmental stressor (Campbell, 1983, 190172) that
is associated with heightened amounts of anxiety, tension, anger, fatigue, depression, and
feelings of helplessness (Evans et al., 1987, 190347; Zeidner and Shechter, 1988, 191973).
Though the relationship between impaired VAQ and mental health is poorly understood,
there are greater emergency calls associated with psychiatric disturbances during periods
with reduced VAQ (Rotton and Frey, 1982, 190477). Studies have shown that reduced VAQ
affects people's behavior, including reductions in outdoor activities, and increased hostility
and aggressive behavior (Evans et al., 1982, 190521; Cunningham, 1979, 191974; Jones and
Bogat, 1978, 190396; Rotton et al., 1979, 190478).
The value of VAQ (both monetary and non-monetary) has been investigated in two
broadly different settings, non-recreational or urban settings and recreational settings,
such as the national parks and wilderness areas where visibility is protected by the RHR
(Trijonis et al., 1990, 157058). In urban settings, public surveys have shown that greater
than 80% of the participants are aware of poor VAQ conditions (Cohen et al., 1986, 190182),
though attitudes towards poor VAQ have been shown to vary by socio-economic status,
health, and length of residence in the urban setting (Barker, 1976, 072137). The economic
importance of urban visibility has been examined by a number of studies designed to
quantify the benefits (or willingness to pay) associated with potential improvements in
urban visibility. Urban visibility valuation research prior to 1997 was summarized in
Chestnut and Dennis (1997, 014525), and was also described in the 2004 Air Quality for PM
(EPA, 2004, 056905) and the 2005 OAQPS PM NAAQS Staff Paper (U.S. EPA, 2005,
090209). These reviews summarize 34 estimates (based on different cities or model
specifications) from six different studies. Since the mid 1990s, however, only one new
valuation study of urban visibility has been published (Beron et al., 2001, 156270)which is
summarized below (Section 9.1.4.6).
In recreational settings, experience based demand models have been developed using
on-site and mail-in surveys to judge the relative importance to national park visitors of
July 2009
9-17
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
various park attributes including good VAQ, to assess visitor awareness of VAQ conditions,
and to explore possible relationships between VAQ and visitor satisfaction (Ross et al.,
1987, 037420; Ross et al., 1985, 044287). At the three western and two eastern national
parks where this survey was conducted, visitors rated the attribute identified as "clean,
clear air" among the most important features of the parks. A random sample of 1800
visitors at one of the parks (Grand Canyon) showed that visitor awareness of VAQ impacts
increased as measured visibility conditions decreased, and that overall park enjoyment and
satisfaction decreased with reduced VAQ. Grand Canyon visitors when asked to indicate
how they would budget their time (e.g., between visiting an archaeological site or a view
lookout point) indicated that they would to be willing to significantly alter their behavior to
experience views under improved VAQ (Malm et al., 1984, 044292).
9.2.3. Monitoring and Assessment
Monitoring and the assessment of monitoring data serve a number of goals with
regard to the visibility effects of PM, including improving the understanding of the
physio/chemical/optical properties of the aerosol, characterizing spatial and temporal air
quality patterns, and assessing the causes (i.e., pollution sources and atmospheric
processes) that are responsible for visibility impairment. Information generated by special
studies employing sophisticated instrumentation are typically needed to advance the
understanding of aerosol properties, while characterizing trends is the product of analyzing
routine monitoring data, whereas assessing the causes of haze usually involves a
weight-of-evidence approach applied to special study and/or routine monitoring data sets
plus the use of air quality simulation modeling. This section summarizes recently available
information that is based on monitoring data.
9.2.3.1. Aerosol Properties
Particle size is the most influential physical property of aerosols with respect to their
dry light extinction efficiency. Chemical composition by size is used to ascertain density
(needed to convert aerodynamic to physical size and to determine particle mass as a
function of size) and to identify the water growth characteristics of the aerosol (needed to
calculate the particle size, density and index of refraction at ambient RH). To characterize
aerosol properties of interest for visibility effects, field monitoring programs typically
include particle size distribution monitoring, high size resolution particle sampling with
July 2009
9-18
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
subsequent compositional analysis, and optical monitoring. These generate data that
permit optical closure assessments where the light scattering and/or light extinction
estimates from the aerosol data are compared to corresponding optical data. Since
component contributions to visibility are generally assessed by applying the IMPROVE or
some similar algorithm to measured or modeled aerosol concentration data, this section will
include recent investigations that evaluate or address various assumptions inherent in the
use of these simple algorithms.
One component of the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational
(BRAVO) Study, conducted at Big Bend NP, TX in the summer and fall of 1999, entailed use
of detailed measurements of aerosol chemical composition, size distribution, water growth,
and optical properties to characterize the aerosol and assess the relationship between
aerosol physical, chemical and optical properties (Malm et al., 2003, 190434; Schichtel et
al., 2004, 179902). Fine ammoniated sulfate during the BRAVO Study was about half the
fine particle mass concentration and was shown to be responsible for about 35% of the light
extinction. Rayleigh scattering was the second largest contributor at about 25%, followed by
coarse particle (about 18%), and organic compounds (about 13%). There was little fine
particle nitrate (less than 5% of the mass concentration) and most of it is apparently in the
form of sodium nitrate and two thirds of it was found in the coarse mode where it comprises
about 8% of the coarse particle mass concentration. Both the composition of the nitrate and
the fact of much of it being in the coarse size mode (2.5 pm >D>10 pm) are inconsistent
with the implied assumptions of the IMPROVE algorithm.
A year-long special study of coarse particle speciation was conducted at nine
IMPROVE remote area monitoring sites during 2003 to 2004 to provide additional
information about the geographic and seasonal variations in coarse particle composition
(Malm et al., 2007, 156730). The same sampling and analytical methodologies procedures
were used for the PMio samples as are routinely used on the IMPROVE PM2.5 samples. The
IMPROVE coarse particle speciation study did not include ammonium analysis, so SO r
and nitrate ions were assumed to be ammonium sulfate and ammonium nitrate. As
expected crustal minerals were the largest contributors to coarse mass overall (about 60%),
though at Mt. Rainier the fraction of coarse PM that was organic exceeded the crustal
mineral by nearly two to one (i.e., 59.2% compared to 33.5%) On average across sites the
organic particulate contributed significantly at about one quarter of the coarse mass, while
ammonium nitrate was the third largest contributor to coarse mass (about 8%). Seas salt
July 2009
9-19
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
was negligible overall, but high at the one coastal site (i.e., 12% at Brigantine, NJ). The two
California sites, San Gorgonio and Sequoia, had the highest coarse nitrate concentrations,
0.74 pg/m3 and 0.69 pg/m3, and high fine nitrates concentrations on average, 2.66 pg/m3 and
2.14 pg/m3, respectively. Brigantine, a coastal site in New Jersey, had the highest fraction of
total nitrate in the coarse size range (36%). The authors speculate that Brigantine's
particulate nitrate is likely sodium nitrate, the result of nitric acid reactions with sodium
chloride. The nine-site average fraction of total nitrate in the coarse size range is 26%. By
contrast, coarse SOr concentrations are small with only about -1% of the total SOr in the
coarse fraction.
Routine IMPROVE monitoring data include the mass concentration, but not the
composition of the coarse PM fraction, so the algorithm used to estimate light extinction
does not include any provision for varied coarse PM composition as shown in this study.
This study shows that about 10% of the coarse mass across the nine monitoring sites is
composed of hygroscopic materials (i.e., ammonium sulfate, ammonium nitrate and sea
salt), which during high humidity conditions will scatter more light than estimated by the
current algorithm (e.g., -20% bias at -90% relative humidity). However, at coastal sites
such as the Brigantine, NJ, IMPROVE site where the combined concentration of the
inorganic salts (i.e., sea salt, nitrate and SOr ) constitute a significant fraction (-24% on
average) of the coarse mass concentration, the IMPROVE algorithm underestimation of
light extinction by coarse PM can be significant for high relative humidity conditions (-60%
at -90% relative humidity). The resulting underestimation of total light extinction is
typically much smaller since fine particle light extinction generally exceeds that
contributed by coarse particles. Another issue with regard to estimating light extinction
from coarse PM concentration when the composition is not crustal minerals, as has been
assumed, has to do with the lower average density of the coarse mode particles that results
in greater particle numbers and/or larger particles and therefore a greater light extinction
efficiency (Malm and Hand, 2007, 155962).
Special studies with more complete, higher time resolution and size resolved
particulate inorganic ion species chemistry and precursor gases were conducted at seven of
the nine sites with IMPROVE coarse particle speciation monitoring (Lee et al., 2008,
156686). This work confirmed the presence of sodium and calcium nitrate (referred to as
mineral nitrate) primarily in the coarse particle size range in addition to fine particle
ammonium nitrate where low temperatures, high humidity and excess ammonium (beyond
July 2009
9-20
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
that required to neutralize the particulate S() r ) favored particle phase equilibrium.
Figure 9-4 is a map showing the locations and sample times and estimated composition of
the total particulate nitrate for the seven locations for this special study. Sites with a high
fraction of ammonium nitrate (e.g., San Gorgonio, Bondville, and Brigantine) have the
highest nitrate contributions to total mass concentration and haze, whereas sites with high
mineral nitrates tend to have low total nitrate contributions. This work shows that the
common assumption that particulate nitrate is in the fine particle size range and consists
principally of ammonium nitrate is not necessarily true.
Grand Catwon (May. 2003)
Bondville (February, 2003)
San Gib ijimio (April, 2003)'
Yosemile (July/Aug, 700?)
Uriyariliiie (Novanber, 2003)
—GRSM (July/Aug, 7004)^1
San Gorgonio (July, 2003)
Kg (tend (July Oci, 1998)
Source: Lee et al. (2008,156686)
Figure 9-4. Estimated fractions of total particulate nitrate during each field campaign comprised of
ammonium nitrate, reacted sea salt nitrate (shown as NaNCh), and reacted soil dust
nitrate (shown as CafNQsh}.
Extinction efficiencies for individual particle species can be theoretically calculated
from sized'resolved aerosol measurements and can be inferred using multiple linear
regression applied to aerosol composition and light extinction measurement data. In a
recent publication, Hand and Malm (2007, 155825) reviewed the literature since 1990 in
which aerosol mass scattering efficiency values were calculated or inferred. From these
they have compiled normalized dry scattering efficiency values for the individual species.
July 2009
9-21
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Based on 93 separate determinations including marine, remote continental and urban
areas data sets, the average dry mass scattering efficiency for ammonium sulfate is
2.5 ± 0.6 m2/g. Average values tended to be somewhat lower for the marine aerosol (~2 m2/g)
than for remote continental (~2.7 m2/g) and urban (2.6 m2/g) areas, and values also tended
to be lower for fairly clean arid locations compared with more humid polluted areas.
Based on 48 separate determinations including remote area and urban area data sets,
the average dry mass scattering efficiency for ammonium nitrate is 2.7 ± 0.5 m2/g (Hand
and Malm, 2007, 155825). Average values were higher in remote locations (2.8 ± 0.5 m 2/g)
compared to urban locations (2.2 ± 0.5 m2/g) though this might be accounted for by the
predominate use of multiple linear regression for the remote areas, which can be biased
high, compared to the use of theoretical calculations for the urban data sets.
Organic fine PM extinction efficiency of 3.9 ± 1.5 m2/g is based on 58 separate
determinations, though much higher values (~6 m2/g) resulted for locations influenced by
industrial andbiomass combustion sources (Hand and Malm, 2007, 155825). These organic
fine PM extinction efficiency values were adjusted to use a consistent ratio of organic mass
to OC (OC) of 1.8 for each determination of the mass concentration. This value is generally
associated with aged organic PM, while for more freshly emitted PM, such as in an urban
environment, a smaller ratio (e.g., 1.4) would be more appropriate. This could explain the
discrepancy between two approaches used to estimate the organic PM light extinction
efficiency for Phoenix (Hand and Malm, 2006, 156517), which resulted in a significantly
lower value where a site specific regression method was used compared to the value
obtained from a method optimized for remote-area monitoring (2.47 m2/g compared to 3.71
m2/g). However in Fresno both the mass balance and light scattering balance was improved
by using a ratio of 1.8 instead of 1.4 to estimate the organic compound mass (Watson and
Chow, 2007, 157127). Another possible or partial factor with respect to urban light
extinction efficiency for organic PM may be that the size distribution of freshly emitted
organic PM in urban areas extends significantly into the ultra-fine particle size range
(Demerjian and Mohnen, 2008, 156392) that is less efficient per mass concentration at light
scattering than the generally larger-sized aged organic PM such as from a distant forest fire
as was measured at the Baltimore Supersite.
Hand and Malm (2007, 155825) also reviewed and made recommendation for
extinction efficiencies for the other PM components including for mixed coarse mode
(1.0 ± 0.9 m2/g based on 51 determinations) and fine mode dust or soil (3.3 ± 0.6 m2/g based
July 2009
9-22
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
on 23 determinations, but recommending 1.0 m2/g for use with data from realistic collection
efficiency samplers) and fine sea salt (4.5 ± 0.9 m2/g based on 25 determinations, but
recommending 1.0 m2/g to 1.3 m2/g for use with data from realistic collection efficiency
samplers). This work did not address light absorption efficiency of EC, CB, or crustal PM.
The Hand and Malm (2007, 155825) average dry mass light scattering efficiency
values are generally consistent with the values for the IMPROVE algorithm (as shown in
equation 9" 1). However the adoption of the IMPROVE algorithm by EPA for calculating the
haze metric used to track trends and assess the nominal pace of progress for the RHR (EPA,
2001, 157068) resulted in much greater scrutiny of its performance in estimating extinction
(Lowenthal and Kumar, 2003, 156712; Malm, 1999, 025037; Malm and Hand, 2007, 155962;
Ryan et al., 2005, 156934). Among the issues raised is that the algorithm tended to
underestimate the light extinction for the haziest conditions that occur principally during
the summer in the southeastern U.S. and overestimate for near pristine conditions that
tend to occur most often in the arid western U.S. Furthermore they showed the lack of mass
or light scattering closure at coastal sites due to sea salt that was not accounted for by the
IMPROVE algorithm. These assessments used mass concentration and light extinction
closure and regression analysis methods to infer that the dry extinction efficiency for the
major fine particle components would need to vary in order to avoid the biased estimates of
light extinction at the extremes. Theoretical calculations of S( )r dry extinction efficiencies
for 41 days of size-resolved chemical composition data for Big Bend, Texas, as part of the
BRAVO Study produced a range of results from ~2.4 m2/g to ~4.1 m2/g, with the larger dry
extinction efficiency values tending to be associated with higher ammonium sulfate mass
concentration and narrower size distributions (Schichtel et al., 2004, 179902).
In response to the technical concerns raised about the performance of the IMPROVE
algorithm, a revised algorithm was developed (Pitchford et al., 2007, 098066). The revised
version of the algorithm differs from the original algorithm by including a fine sea salt term
related to the measured chloride ion concentration, increases by about 30% the mass
concentration of the organic aerosol component by changing the ratio of organic compound
mass to OC mass from 1.4 to 1.8, uses site elevation dependent Rayleigh scattering in place
of 10 Mm 1 that had been used at every site, added a NO2 light absorption term and
employs a split component model for the secondary particulate components (i.e., SO42",
nitrate and organic species) with new water growth terms to better estimate their
July 2009
9-23
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
extinction at the high and low extremes of the range. The revised algorithm is displayed
below in Equation 9-2.
bext « 2.2 x /' (lilI) x [SmallSulfate + 4.8 x fL(RH) x [Large Sulfate]
+ 2.4 x /' (lill) x [Small Nitratd + 5.1 x fL(RLl) x [Large NitratA
+ 2.8 x [SmallOrganic Mas A + 6.1 x [Large OrganicMasA
+ 10 x [ElementalCarboA
+ 1 x [FineSoiA
+ 1.7 xfjEB x [SeaSalA
+ 0.6 x [Coarse Mas A
+ RayleighScattering (Site Sped fib
+ 0.33 x [N02 (ppH}\
Equation 9-2
Small and large SO42 , nitrate and organic mass are used to refer to the splitting of
the concentrations of each of those three species into two size distributions. This approach
accounts for increased light extinction efficiency with mass by using a simple mixing model
that assume that each of these three components are comprised of an external mixture of
small and large particle size modes. Conceptually, the large mode particles represent aged
or cloud-processed aerosol, while the small mode particles represent relatively newly
generated particles from the gas phase precursors. The former are more likely to be
associated with high concentrations while the latter are likely to be at relatively low
concentration.
The geometric mean diameter and standard deviations assumed for these two size
modes are 0.5 pm and 1.5 for the large mode particles and 0.2 pm and 2.2 for the small
mode particles. Mie theory applied to these size distributions for the three species results in
dry extinction efficiencies for the small and large mode ammonium sulfate (2.2 m2/g and 4.8
m2/g), ammonium nitrate (2.4 m2/g and 5.1 m2/g) and organic mass (2.8 m2/g and 6.1 m 2/g)-
Water growth terms specifically derived for the small and large size distribution using the
upper branch of the hygroscopic growth curves for ammonium sulfate are applied to both
the SO42- and nitrate PM. No water growth is assumed for organic PM.
A simple empirically developed apportionment approach that was evaluated by
testing the new algorithms estimated light scattering at the 21 IMPROVE sites that have
nephelometer-measured light scattering data. For each sample, the fraction of the fine
particle component (SO42 , nitrate, or organic mass) that is assigned to the large mode is
calculated by dividing the total concentration of the component by 20 pg/m3 (e.g., if the total
July 2009
9-24
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
fine particle nitrate concentration is 4 pg/m3, the large mode concentration is 1/5 of 4 pg/m3
or 0.8 pg/m3, leaving 3.2 pg/m3 in the small mode). If the total concentration of a component
exceeds 20 pg/m3, all of it is assumed to be in the large mode.
The performance of the original and revised IMPROVE algorithms was evaluated
using the data for 21 IMPROVE remote-area monitoring sites that also have nephelometer
monitoring of particle light scattering. Figures 9"5 and 9-6 are scatterplots of the estimated
versus measured light scattering for the two algorithms. The revised algorithm has
noticeably reduced bias at the upper and lower extremes. However, the new algorithm
estimates have somewhat reduced precision (i.e., the points are more broadly scattered).
States have adopted the new algorithm for the technical assessments that support their
RHR State Implementation Plans, but the revised algorithm was too recently developed to
be incorporated into any of the peer-reviewed technical literature reported on below. In
general the differences resulting from use of the original versus the revised IMPROVE
algorithm in identifying best and worst haze conditions and the apportionment of the
various PM components are small with exception of coastal locations where sea salt may be
a significant contributor.
July 2009
9-25
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
100 150 200 250
Measured Bsp
Source: Pitchford, et al. (2007, 098066)
Figure 9-5. A scatter plot of the original IMPROVE algorithm estimated particle light scattering
versus measured particle light scattering.
150 200
Measured Bsp
Source: Pitchford, et al. (2007, 098066).
Figure 9-6. Scatter plot of the revised algorithm estimates of light scattering versus measured light
scattering.
July 2009
9-26
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
9.2.3.2. Spatial Patterns
The IMPROVE network is the basis for much of what is known about particulate
species spatial and temporal patterns for remote areas of the U.S. Though IMPROVE
includes some urban monitoring sites, most of what is known about urban particle
speciation trends is based on the EPASpeciation Trend Network (STN) and other similarly
operated state particle speciation sites jointly referred to as the Chemical Speciation
Network (CSN) (Jayanty, 2003, 156605). The number of IMPROVE network sites has
increased considerably beginning in 2000, first to increase its ability to generate data
representative of the 156 visibility-protected national parks and wilderness areas, then
later as the states in the central U.S. requested additional remote-area monitoring to better
understand their contributions to regional haze. The expansion of the network into the
central U.S. significantly improved the understanding of spatial trends in a region of the
country that had little speciation monitoring. Except as otherwise noted most of the
information in this section was from the IMPROVE Report IV (DeBell, 2006, 156388) and
displays of data that are readily generated using the Visibility Information Exchange Web
Site (VIEWS). VIEWS, the ambient monitoring data system, is one of several websites (as
described in Table 9-1) sponsored by the Regional Planning Organizations (RPO) that
documents substantial, though often otherwise unpublished, technical information
generated to support implementation of the RHR.
Figure 9*7 shows maps of remote area light extinction estimates from PM speciation
data for two yr selected to demonstrate the additional information available due to the
expansion of the IMPROVE network into the central U.S. The locations of monitoring sites
supplying the data shown as color contours are shown as dot on the maps. Users of such
contour maps are usually cautioned that the contours are only there to guide the eye to
sites with similar measurements and that nothing should be implied about spatial patterns
where there are no monitoring sites. Certainly these plots give proof to the wisdom of such
warnings. Prior to 2001 there were no IMPROVE or any other remote-area aerosol
speciation monitoring sites in the central states between northern Minnesota and Michigan
to the north and Arkansas and Kentucky to the south. The lack of monitoring over such a
large region in the center of the country hid the presence of high average regional haze over
the Midwestern U.S. Smaller scale differences are seen in the rest of the country and some
of those are due to interannual variations as well as to better spatial resolution made
possible by a more dense monitoring network.
July 2009
9-27
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table 9-1. Regional Planning Organization websites with visibility characterization and source
attribution assessment information.
.. Name and Web Address RPO Information Content and Comments
Information
RPO Home Pages Western Regional Air Partnership WRAP Organizational structure, plans, projects, reports and links to other sites with
additional information.
http:llwww.wrapair.orgl
Central Regional Air Planning Association CENRAP
http:llwww.cenrap.orgl
Midwest Regional Planning Organization MRPO
MANE-VU works in close cooperation with Northeast States for Coordinated Air
Use Management (NESCAUM) and Mid-Atlantic Regional Air Management
Association (MARAMA) to develop the technical information for RHR in the
Northeast. All three web sites contain unique technical support information.
Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union MANE-VU
http:llwww.manevu.orgl NESCAUM
http:||www.nescaum.org|topics|regional-haze MARAMA
http:||www.marama.org|visibility|
Visibility - Air Quality
Monitoring Data
Visibility Information Exchange Web Site
http:Hvista.cira.colostate.edu/viewsl
All RPOs
All IMPROVE and most other PM speciation data, RHR compatible derived
parameters, and user-friendly tools to summarize and display data.
Emission Inventory
Data
Emissions Data Management System
http:ffwww.wrapedms.orgfdefault login.asp
WRAP
WRAP emission inventory data warehouse and tools that provides a consistent
approach to regional emissions tracking
Monitoring Data
Assessment
Causes of Haze Assessment
http:llwww.coha.dri.edu)
WRAP
CENRAP
Monitoring site-specific descriptive characterizations and maps, seasonal and
trends analysis, air flow analysis, & receptor modeling.
Visibility Modeling
U. of California-Riverside Modeling Center
http://pah.cert.ucr.edu/aqm/308/ WRAP
CENRAP
http://pah.cert.ucr.edu/aqm/cenrap/index.shtml vistas
Descriptions of input data, performance, and results of regional scale modeling
(CMAQ & CAMx) & source attribution for base and future yr regional haze.
http://pah.cert.ucr.edu/vistas/
Integrated Information
to Support RHR SIP
Preparations
Technical Support System
http://matar.cira.colostate.edu/tss/
WRAP
Provides access and common formats to display and summarize emissions
inventory information, monitoring data/ assessment and regional haze modeling
result to aid state and tribal analyst prepare RHR implementation plans.
http:llG4.27.125.175lmrpo.html
Visibility Improvement State and Tribal VISTAS
Association of the Southeast
http:llwww.vistas-sesarm.orgl
July 2009
9-28
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Source: VIEWS (http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/views/)
Figure 9-7. IMPROVE network PM species estimated light extinction for 2000 (left) and for 2004
(right).
Source: VIEWS (http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/views/)
Figure 9-8. Mean estimated light extinction from PM speciation measurements for the first (top
left), second (top right), third (bottom left), and fourth (bottom right) calendar quarters of
2004.
July 2009
9-29
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Figure 9"8 shows the seasonal pattern of PM species estimated light extinction using
maps of mean values for each of the calendar quarter for 2004. The first quarter has the
highest region of haze centered in the Midwestern U.S.! the warmer second and third
quarters have the region of highest haze over the Ohio River Valley! and the fourth quarter
is a composite with high haze in both the Midwest and Ohio River Valley. Smaller regions of
haze show up in the Columbia River Valley (border between Washington and Oregon) in the
colder first and fourth quarters and in Southern California in the warmer second and third
quarters.
The IMPROVE algorithm permits each PM component contribution to light extinction
to be separately estimated. Figures 9-9, 9-10 and 9-11 display the seasonal variation of the
percent contribution to aerosol light extinction by the various component estimates.
Figure 9"9 shows the contributions by SOr and nitrate particulate including the haze
enhancement caused by the absorbed water in humid conditions. As shown in Figures 9"9, a
large regional pattern of high contribution to haze by nitrate PM is centered in the
Midwest, and during the cooler months the nitrate PM is the dominant cause of haze in the
region responsible for a third to a half of the particulate light extinction. Midwestern
particulate nitrate is responsible for the regional pattern of the highest haze conditions
shifting from the Ohio River Valley during summer to the Midwest in the winter as shown
in Figure 9"8. Particulate nitrate is also a significant contributor to particulate light
extinction year-around in parts of California, where it generally contributes 20%-40%. The
Pacific Northwest, parts of Idaho and Utah experience large contributions to particulate
light extinction by nitrates during the colder seasons, with contributions of 20%-30%.
Figure 9-9 also shows that particulate S( )r is the predominate contributor in the eastern
U.S., where it contributes 40% or more on average and during the summer months up to
three quarters of the particulate light extinction over much of the East. In the western U.S.
particulate SO r generally contribute 20-50% of the particle light extinction. Regions of the
lowest fractional contributions by particulate S( )r and nitrate for any calendar quarter are
generally in the western U.S., and as are shown in the subsequent two figures have
significant contributions by crustal PM components (i.e., coarse mass and fine soil) and by
carbonaceous PM (i.e., organic mass and EC).
Figure 9" 10 shows the contributions to haze by the carbonaceous PM components (i.e.,
organic mass and EC). They show broadly similar patterns with the greatest contributions
in the western U.S. especially during the warmer months of the year. For the most part this
July 2009
9-30
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
spatial pattern results from the dominant contributions to haze by SO r and nitrate PM in
the eastern half of the U.S., leaving relatively little for other component contributions. The
fractional contribution to haze by organic PM is generally two to five times that of EC. In
absolute terms, both carbonaceous components tend to have two to three times higher
concentrations in the eastern U.S. than in the non-coastal western states.
July 2009
9-31
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Source: VIEWS (http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/views/)
Figure 9-9. Percent contributions of ammonium nitrate (left column) and ammonium sulfate (right
column) to particulate light extinction for each calendar quarter of 2004 (first through
fourth quarter arranged from top to bottom). Note that the contour intervals are not the
same for the two species contributions.
July 2009
9-32
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Source: VIEWS (http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/views/)
Figure 9-10. Percent contributions of organic mass (left column) and EC (right column) to particulate
light extinction for each calendar quarter of 2004 (first through fourth quarter arranged
from top to bottom). Note that the contour intervals are not the same for the two species
contributions.
July 2009 9-33 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Source: VIEWS (http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/views/)
July 2009
9-34
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Figure 9-11. Percent contributions of coarse mass (left column) and fine soil (right column) to
particulate light extinction for each calendar quarter of 2004 (first through fourth
quarter arranged from top to bottom). Note that the contour intervals are not the same
for the two species contributions.
Figure 9" 11 shows the contributions to haze by coarse mass and fine soil components.
As with the carbonaceous components, these crustal dom inated components have a similar
spatial pattern with regions of highest contribution to haze in the western U.S., and just as
for the carbonaceous PM, the explanation for low contributions in the eastern U.S. is the
dominant contributions to haze by SO r and nitrate PM leaving relatively little for other
components. The crustal components contribute more to haze in the arid regions of the west
including the southwestern deserts. In absolute terms, coarse mass concentrations are as
high in the rural areas of the center of the country (including Oklahoma, Arkansas, Kansas,
Missouri, and Iowa) as they are in the Desert Southwest. Typically coarse mass
contributions to haze exceed those of fine mass by a factor of 2-4.
9.2.3.3. Urban and Regional Patterns
Using a combination of IMPROVE and CSN data, it is possible to compare urban
PM2.5 concentrations and composition to corresponding remote-area regional values. These
are shown as paired color contours maps for IMPROVE and IMPROVE plus CSN (see
Figures 9-12 to 9-23). The degree of comparability of the data from these two networks was
assessed by an analysis of two yr of co-located IMPROVE and CSN data from six urban
areas. The CSN organic mass data were adjusted for a positive sampling artifact prior to
inclusion in this assessment, in a fashion similar to that used for the IMPROVE data set
(pages 29-30, DeBell, 2006, 156388). Note that the contour scales are different between the
two maps for each component pair of maps so that each contains as much information as
possible using ten concentration contours. To assess the degree to which urban areas have
higher PM component concentrations compared to regional background note how many
contour intervals surround the urban monitoring sites. The U.S. EPA (2004, 190219) used
the pairing of IMPROVE and CSN monitoring sites at 13 selected urban areas to separate
local and regional contributions of three major PM2.5 components as shown in Figure 9-24.
In Figures 9-12 and 9-13, urban PM2.5 concentrations are systematically higher than
those in the surrounding non-urban regions. The urban excess is generally much higher in
the western U.S. than in the East (e.g., there are five contour intervals separating Salt
Lake City from its remote regional area compared to only two for Indianapolis). This
July 2009
9-35
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
implies that eastern and western urban PM2.5 concentrations and resulting visibility are
less different than the eastern and western regional concentrations and visibility.
• IMPROVE Site
Hawaii
Alaska
¦ IMPROVE Urban Site
Puerto Rico /
Virgin Islands
_ 146
10 9
9.68
8 47
7.26
6.05
4.84
3.63
h 2.42
¦ 1 21
¦o.OO
|jg/m3
Source: Debell (2006,156388).
Figure 9-12. IMPROVE Mean PM2.5 mass concentration determined by summing the major
components for the 2000-2004.
July 2009
9-36
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
• IMPROVE Site
¦ IMPROVE Urban Site
Puerto Rico/
Virgin Islands
30 7
¦ 14.7
13 0
11.4
9.78
8.15
6,52
4 89
13.26
1.63
0.00
Mg/m3
Alaska
Hawaii
Source: Debell (2006,156388).
Figure 9-13. IMPROVE and CSN (STN) mean PM2.5 mass concentration determined by summing the
major components for 2000-2004
• IMPROVE Site
¦ IMPROVE Urban Site
Puerto Rico /
Virgin Islands
Alaska
Hawaii
Source: Debell (2006,156388).
Figure 9-14. IMPROVE mean ammonium nitrate concentrations for 2000-2004.
July 2009
9-37
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
• IMPROVE
¦ IMPROVE
Site
Urban
Puerto Rico /
Virgin Islands
Alaska
Hawaii
Site
Source: Debell (2006,156388).
Figure 9-15. IMPROVE and CSN (STN) mean ammonium nitrate concentrations for 2000-2004.
® Alaska
• IMPROVE Site
¦ IMPROVE Urban Site
Hawaii
6.63
5.46
4.86
4.25
3.64
13.04
2.43
1.82
11.21
0.61
0.00
Mg/m3
O
Puerto Rico /
Virgin Islands
Source: Debell (2006,156388).
Figure 9-16. IMPROVE mean ammonium sulfate concentrations for 2000-2004.
July 2009
9-38
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
A STN Site
• IMPROVE Site
¦ IMPROVE Urban Site
e e
Puerto Rico /
Virgin Islands
® Alaska
Hawaii
Source: Debell (2006,156388).
Figure 9-17. IMPROVE and CSN (STN) mean ammonium sulfate concentrations for 2000-2004.
Figures 9-14, 9-15, and 9-24 show the PM2.6 nitrate in remote and urban areas. Here
the western states have urban particulate nitrate concentrations that far exceed twice the
remote area regional concentrations. For the Central Valley of California and Los Angeles
areas, the urban excess of ammonium nitrate exceeds regional concentrations by 2 pg/m3 to
12 pg/m3. In the region of the Midwest nitrate bulge, the urban concentrations were less
than twice the regional concentrations for an annual urban excess of about 1 pg/m3.
Northeast and southeast of the Midwest nitrate bulge, annual urban particulate nitrate
concentrations are several tenths to about one ug/rrr above the remote area regional
concentrations, with warmer southern locations tending to have the smaller concentrations
of both regional and urban excess particulate nitrate.
As shown in Figures 9-16, 9-17, and 9-24, annual-averaged urban particulate SOr
concentrations are generally not much higher than the regional values, with urban excess
generally of less than about a half ug/m3. The exceptions apparent by comparing Figures
9-16 and 9-17 are in Texas and Louisiana where urban excess particulate SO r are greater
than 1 pg/m3, perhaps caused by local emissions (e.g., from oil refineries). Urban
contributions are a larger fraction of the total particulate S( ) r concentrations in the
western U.S. because the regional concentrations are much lower than in the East. The
modest additional particulate S( )r concentrations associated with urban areas suggests
July 2009
9-39
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
that most particulate SOr is regionally distributed, and that IMPROVE and CSN
monitoring sites can be used together to enhance the ability to delineate particulate SOr
spatial distributions. For example, note that the additional data from urban sites shown in
Figure 9" 17 extends north and south distribution of the high particulate SO r loading
shown in Figure 9" 16 over Tennessee and Kentucky, as well as the high loadings over
southern Pennsylvania, eastern West Virginia and northern Virginia. (The color-contour
suggested dip in concentrations between the two eastern particulate SOr high
concentrations regions may not exist in the atmosphere, but this cannot be verified without
speciation monitoring sites in southern Ohio, the boarder of Kentucky and West Virginia
and western Virginia.)
Urban and remote area carbonaceous PM2.5 are displayed in Figures 9-18 and 9-19
(organic mass), 9-20 and 9-21 (EC), and 9-24 (total carbon = organic + EC concentration).
Just as with particulate nitrate both organic mass and EC concentrations are more than
twice the remote-area background concentrations for western urban monitoring locations.
One of the more interesting pairing of sites is for the Virgin Islands compared to the urban
site at San Juan Puerto Rico (see the map cutout Figures 9-18 through 9"2l). The San Juan
urban excess OC is moderate, while the EC value is among the most extreme inferred in
this manner. For eastern urban areas, approximately half the total carbon is local while the
other half is regional. In eastern urban areas, carbonaceous and SO r particulate are the
two major components of PM2.5, with roughly equal contributions, and account for over 80%
of the mass concentration. Edgerton et al. (2004, 156413) showed that carbonaceous PM2.5
is responsible for most of the urban excess above regional concentrations at four
urban/rural paired Southeastern Aerosol Research and Characterization (SEARCH)
monitoring sites in the southeastern U.S. However, the higher overall light extinction
efficiency for SOr resulting from its hydrophilicity gives it ~ 2:1 dominance in
responsibility for eastern urban light extinction.
Urban and remote area fine soil PM2.5 concentrations are displayed in Figures 9-22
and 9"23. Urban fine soil concentrations are at most a few tenths of a ug/ma higher than the
regional background concentrations and in some regions they are much less. Just as with
carbonaceous PM2.5, the Virgin Island, San Juan, Puerto Rico pair are interesting for fine
soil. In this case the interesting feature is that both of these island monitoring sites have
high concentrations of fine soil, which is caused by their being in the trans-Atlantic
transport path of dust from Africa (Prospero, 1996, 156889).
July 2009
9-40
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
No urban-remote pair of coarse mass concentration maps is available because CSN
does not monitor coarse mass. In Malm et al. (2004, 156728) a map of annual mean coarse
mass concentration is shown for 2003 which includes the values for IMPROVE urban sites,
including two in the western U.S. with much more coarse mass than the nearby remote
areas monitoring sites (i.e., ~24 pg/m3 compared to ~9 pg/m3 for Phoenix, AZ, and ~6 pg/m3
compared to ~2 pg/m3 for Ptxget Sound, WA) and one eastern IMPROVE site at Washington,
DC with less coarse mass than the surrounding remote area values (~2 pg/m3 compared to
~4 pg/m3).
• IMPROVE Site
• Alaska
Hawaii
Puerto Rico /
Virgin Islands
— 5.79
¦ 3.72
3.30
2.89
2.48
2.07
1.65
1.24
10.83
0.41
0.00
pg/m3
¦ IMPROVE Urban Site
Source: Debell 12006,156388).
Figure 9-18. IMPROVE monitored mean organic mass concentrations for 2000-2004.
July 2009
9-41
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Hawaii
Alaska
• IMPROVE Site
¦ IMPROVE Urban Site
O
Puerto Rico/
Virgin Islands
12.4
6 47
5.75
5.03
4.31
3.60
2.88
2.16
11.44
0.72
0.00
|jg/m3
Source: Debell (2006,156388).
Figure 9-19. IMPROVE and CSN (STN) mean organic mass concentrations for 2000-2004.
• IMPROVE Site
0 96
0.44
0.39
0.34
0.29
0.25
0.20
0.15
10.10
0.05
0.00
pg/m3
Alaska
Hawaii
Puerto Rico I
Virgin Islands
v}
¦ IMPROVE Urban Site
Source: Debell (2006.156388).
Figure 9-20. IMPROVE mean EC concentrations for 2000-2004.
July 2009
9-42
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
o
Hawaii
Alaska
• IMPROVE Site
¦ Urban IMPROVE Site
• e
Puerto Rico /
Virgin Islands
Source: Debell (2006.156388).
Figure 9-21. IMPROVE and CSN (STN) mean EC concentrations for 2000-2004.
• IMPROVE Site
Hawaii
¦ IMPROVE Urban Site
Puerto Rico /
Virgin Islands
3.08
¦ 1.44
1.28
1.12
0.96
0.80
0.64
0.48
_ 0.32
I 0.16
¦o.oo
|jg/m3
Source: Debell (2006,156388).
Figure 9-22. IMPROVE mean fine soil concentrations for 2000-2004.
July 2009
9-43
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
A STN Site
• IMPROVE Site
• • IMPROVE Site
¦ IMPROVE Urban Site
e ©
Puerto Rico/
Virgin Islands
IU.ida
0.14
0.00
4 80
1.29
0.72
0.57
(jg/m3
0.43
0.29
1.14
1.00
0.86
® Alaska
Hawaii
Source: Debell (2006,156388).
Figure 9-23. IMPROVE and CSN (STN) fine soil concentrations, 2000-2004.
Figure 9-25 shows the remote area coarse mass concentrations as measured by the
IMPROVE network. The pattern of high coarse mass concentrations from Oklahoma to
Iowa is comparable to the high concentrations in the desert southwest, though as shown in
Figure 9-11 it contributes a smaller relative share of the light extinction because of the
higher contributions to haze by particulate nitrate and sulfate in this agricultural region of
the country Comparing Figures 9"22 and 9-25 shows that the coarse mass and fine soil
concentration patterns are similar for the desert southwest but there is a much lower fine
soil to coarse mass concentration ratio for the agricultural center of the country suggesting
a regional difference in the size distribution of the coarse mass, perhaps due to differences
in suspendable soil materials.
9.2.3.4. Temporal Trends
Visibility trend analysis requires relatively long data records to avoid having
meteorologically driven interannual variability obscure more meaningful emissions "driven
air quality trends. A requirement for long-term data limits the number of monitoring sites
useful for trend analysis. Maps that show haze trends for IMPROVE sites for the 10-yr
period from 1995 through 2004 for the mean of the 20% best and the 20% worst haze days
where sites are required to have a minimum of 6 complete yr of data during the 10-yr
July 2009
9-44
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
period are shown in Figures 9-26 and 9-27, respectively. The best haze days have improving
haze at most sites (32 of 47), no trend at several sites (10 of 47) and degrading visibility at
just one site (Great Sand Dunes, CO). The worst haze days have improving haze conditions
at several sites (13 of 47), no trend at most sites (30 of 47) and degrading visibility at a few
western sites (4 of 47).
July 2009
9-45
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Nitrates
Sulfates
Fresno
Missoula
I |
5aIt Lake City
WEST
Tulsa
¦
EAST
St. Louis
¦
Bi rmingham
XD
Indianapolis
Atlanta
X
Clweland
Charlotte
Richmond
=~
~ Regional
Contribution
Baltimore
~ Local
Contribution
New York City
_J |
~i 1 1 r~
10
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Annual Average Concentration
of Nitrates, ug/m3
Fresno
Missoula
Salt Lake City
Tulsa
St. Louis
Birmingham
Indianapolis
Atlanta
Cleveland
Charlotte
Richmond
Baltimore
New York City
XI
WEST
EAST
~ Regional
Contribution
~ Local
Contribution
i—r
2
~i—r
4 6 8
Annual Average Concentration
of Sulfates, ug/m3
"1—r
10
12
Carbon
Fresno
Missoula
Salt Lake City
Tulsa
St. Louis
Birmingham
Indianapolis
Atlanta
Cleveland
Charlotte
Richmond
Baltimore
New York City
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Annual Average Concentration
of Carbon, ng/m3
WEST
I I
EAST
I I
|
|
| |
I
1 ~ Regional
Contribution
|
~ Local
—1 Contribution
I
i 1 1 1 1 1 1 r
Source: U.S. EPA (2004,190219)
Figure 9-24. Regional and local contributions to annual average PM2.5 by particulate SO42", nitrate
and total carbon (i.e., organic plus EC) for select urban areas based on paired IMPROVE
and CSN monitoring sites.
July 2009
9-46 DRAFT-00 NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
• IMPROVE Site
Hawaii
¦ IMPROVE Urban Site
Puerto Rico /
Virgin Islands
Alaska
¦ 22 1
8.92
7.93
6.94
5.95
4.96
3.96
2.97
11.98
0.99
0.00
(jg/rrv
Source: Debell (2006,156388).
Figure 9-25. IMPROVE mean coarse mass concentrations for 2000-2004.
Eight- ten- and sixteen-yr trends analysis conducted for the Western Regional Air
Partnership (WRAP) as part of the Causes of Haze Assessment (htto 7/www.wrauair.or)
show that improving trends for the 20% best haze days for the sites in the western U.S.
generally correspond to improving trends for all of the major components with the exception
of particulate nitrate. Trends assessment for the worst haze days at western sites show
consistent reductions in particulate S( )r- , but otherwise have mixed increasing and
decreasing haze component trends, many of which are not statistically significant.
Substantial interannual and shorter term spatial and temporal wildfire activity variations
have been shown to have a significant impact on the variability of haze in the Western U.S.
(Park et al., 2006, 190469; Spracklen et al., 2007, 190485). Edgerton et al. (2004, 156413)
showed a decreasing trend in PMa.e of about 18% (corresponding to 1 pg/m3 to 2 pg/m3) for
four urban-rural paired SEARCH sites in the Southeastern U.S. corresponding to similar
reductions in SO#" and carbonaceous particulate.
July 2009
9-47
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
iMoosehorn
Greai Sai d Dunes
Weminuche
Smoky Mtns
¦ Handel
Petrified Forest
Ikefenokee
Improving Trend, p<=0.05
Improving Trend, 0.05
-------
Bridger
Improving Trend, p<=0.05
Improving Trend, 0.05
-------
than 10%. Others have shown similar decreasing particulate S( )r concentration trends
and a correspondence in trends between SO2 emissions and particulate SO42- concentration
by region (EPA, 2004, 056905; Holland et al., 1999, 092051).
Holland et al. (1999, 092051) developed and compared NOx emissions trends from
1989 to 1995 to corresponding trends in total nitrogen concentration (defined as particulate
nitrate plus gaseous nitric acid) for the eastern U.S. (states between Louisiana to
Minnesota and further east) based on data from 34 rural CASTNet dry deposition
monitoring sites. They found a decrease in nitrogen median values of about 8% associated
with a decrease of 5.4% in non-biogenic NOx emissions. Trends in haze associated with
particulate S( )r and nitrate concentrations should correspond fairly well with trends in
their concentration due to the simple relationship between concentration and light
extinction at any relative humidity. However, nitrogen as defined in the Holland et al.
(1999, 092051) trend analysis includes the nitrogen from particulate nitrate and gaseous
nitric acid, but nitric acid does not contribute to light extinction. For situations with limited
atmospheric ammonia or elevated temperatures, trends in nitrogen may be principally in
nitric acid with no net change in nitrate light extinction. Alternately with abundant
ammonia and low temperatures the trend in nitrogen may be principally in particulate
nitrate and the nitrate component of haze.
July 2009
9-50
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Western US
North Eastern US
1.15 5
m 0.75
0.5 1 1—1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.46
1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
South Middle US
3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 54
1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
South Eastern US
» 4.5
6.75
5,825
.2
M
3,375 |
O
m
2.25
1S88 1990 1982 1994 199® 1938
Sulfate Ion
1988 1S80 1992 1184 1988 1S98
SO: Emissions
Source: Malm et al. (2002,156727).
Figure 9-28. Ten-yr trends in the 80th percentile particulate S042" concentration based on IMPROVE
and CASTNet monitoring and net SO2 emissions from the National Emissions Trends
(NET) data base by region of the U.S.
Ten-yr trends (1994-2003) of particulate nitrate contribution to light extinction during
the 20% worst haze conditions conducted as part of the Causes of Haze Assessment (see the
link in Table 9"l) are shown in Figure 9-29. This indicates that haze from particulate
nitrates is increasing across the western U.S. at a rate of several Mm"1 per year in parts of
California and at a rate of several tenths of an Mm 1 across the Four-Corners states. A
similar particulate nitrate trends map (not shown here) for the 20% best haze conditions
that is available at the same web site shows decreasing particulate nitrate contribution to
light extinction at nearly all of the western monitoring sites. While statistically significant,
these trends for both the 20% worst and 20% best haze periods are influenced by an
unexplained nationwide period of depressed nitrate concentrations measured by the
July 2009
9-51
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
IMPROVE network during a 4-yr period from the winter of 1996-97 through the winter of
2000-01. Extensive examinations of plausible monitoring methodological explanations have
failed to offer any evidence that the data are invalid (McDade, 2006, 192075), but no
satisfactory atmospheric or emissions-related explanation has been offered to account for
this four-yr depression of nitrate. Similar analyses of particulate nitrate haze trends are
not available for the rest of the country.
Maps of remote-area 8-, 10-, and 16-yr trends for carbonaceous and crustal PM species
based on IMPROVE monitoring are available for the western U.S. conducted as part of the
Causes of Haze Assessment. Generally these show a broad range of results (i.e., a mixture
of statistically significant upward or downward trends and insignificant trends often with
neighboring sites having opposing trends) that vary considerably depending on the number
of years selected (i.e., 8, 10, or 16) and whether trends are for the best, worst, or middle of
the haze distribution data. The scatter in these results is undoubtedly due to the high
inter annual variability and varying locations of wildfire and wind-suspended dust
emissions that dominate the remote-area concentrations of the carbonaceous and crustal
PM species in the western U.S.
July 2009
9-52
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Source: http://www.coha.dri.edu/
Figure 9-29. Map of 10-yr trends (1994-2003) in haze by particulate nitrate contribution to haze for
the worst 20% annual haze periods. The orientation, size and color of the arrows
indicate the direction, magnitude and statistical level of significance of the trends.
These consistent upward trends may be a misleading result due to an unexplained
sampling issue (see text for additional information).
9.2.3.5. Causes of Haze
In order to attribute haze to emissions from individual sources, source types, or source
regions, scientists generally apply any of a number of receptor and air quality simulation
modeling approaches and when using multiple approaches they reconcile the results of each
using a weight-of-evidence methodology Commonly this methodology has been applied to
the extensive datasets generated by special studies designed to estimate source-receptor
relationships for a few receptor locations or for individual emission sources (Pitchford et al.,
1999, 156873; Pitchford et al., 2005, 156874; Schichtel et al., 2005, 156957). More recently
the Regional Planning Organizations (RPOs) have sponsored extensive regional haze source
attribution assessments using weight-of-evidence methodologies to reconcile attribution
results for virtually all of the remote-area IMPROVE sites to support the development of
State Implementation Plans for the RHR. Additionally, a number of recent urban special
Legend
WN Slope
ft 0.064 - 0.093
ft 0.094 - 0.170
Virgin Islands
Hawaii
July 2009
9-53
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
studies, including those sponsored by EPAPM Supersites program (Solomon and Hopke,
2008, 156997), have addressed the causes of and sources contributing to urban excess PM
concentrations above region concentrations. Attribution results uncertainties are generally
larger than those of the measurements upon which they are based because they also
include model uncertainties and assumptions, as well as issues of representativeness (e.g.,
How well does the data used in the analysis represent the typical emissions, air quality and
meteorological conditions of interest?). As such it is advisable to treat the attribution
results reported below as semi-quantitative.
The relative importance of the PM species that contribute to haze varies by region of
the U.S. and time of year as seen in Figures 9-9, 9-10 and 9-11, above. Generally haze in the
western half of the U.S. is not dominated by any one or two PM species. In the eastern half
of the U.S., SO42_, especially during summer and nitrate during the winter in the Midwest
are the dominant haze species. As described above, urban haze can be viewed as a
composite of the regional and local contributions where local contributions seem to be
dominated by carbonaceous and to a lesser extent nitrate and crustal PM components.
There have been far fewer urban investigations that explicitly consider visibility impacts,
though there are numerous studies of urban PM source attribution. The order of discussion
below on the cause of haze is by region beginning in the western U.S. and proceeding to the
east, analogous to dominant air flow patterns across the lower 48 states and will include
information from urban studies along side those of remote-area haze investigations.
Based on modeling of an episode (September 23-25, 1996) in the California South
Coast Air Basin (SCAB) and another episode (January 4-6, 1996) in the San Joaquin Valley
(SJV) by Ying and Kleeman (2006, 098359), about 80% of the particulate SC>42~ for both
regions are from upwind sources (i.e., thought to be principally from offshore sources
including marine shipping, long-range transport and natural marine sources), with most of
the remaining associated with diesel and high-sulfur fuel combustion. Kleeman et al. (1999,
011286), using a combination of measurements and modeling, showed that the upwind
particulate SO r source region for the SCAB was over the Pacific Ocean (confirmed by
measurements on Santa Catalina Island) and that these particles subsequently grew with
accumulation of additional secondary aerosol material, principally ammonium nitrate as
they traversed the SCAB. The majority of the nitric acid that forms particulate nitrate in
the SCAB is from diesel and gasoline combustion (-63%), while much of the ammonia is
from agricultural sources (-40%), catalyst equipped gasoline combustion (-16%), and
July 2009
9-54
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
upwind sources (-18%). The majority of the OC found in SCAB was attributed in this study
to primary emissions by transportation-related sources including diesel (-13%) and
gasoline (-44%) engines and paved road dust (-12%). At the Fullerton site in the middle of
the SCAB the concentration of locally generated organics is roughly double that of the
locally generated nitrates (-5.6 pg/m3 compared to -2.4 pg/m3), while at Riverside on the
east edge of the SCAB and near the large agricultural sources of ammonia emissions, the
particulate nitrate concentrations are nearly double that of organic PM (-17 pg/m3
compared to -10 pg/m3).
Ying and Kleeman (2006, 098359) showed that during the winter 1996 episode in the
SJV most of the nitric acid that forms particulate nitrate is from upwind sources (-57%)
with diesel and gasoline combustion contributing most of the rest (30%), while much of the
ammonia is from upwind sources (-39%) and a combination of area, soil and fertilizer
sources (-52%). In an assessment of PM particle size and composition in the SJV during the
winter of 2000-2001, Herner et al. (2006, 135981) showed that fresh emissions of
carbonaceous PM from combustion sources in urban locations (Sacramento, Modesto, and
Bakersfield, CA) move quickly from ultrafine particle size (i.e., diameter -0.1 pm) to
accumulation mode by condensation with accumulation mode (i.e., diameter -0.5 pm)
particles, and that secondary nitrate particle formation occurs preferentially on the surface
of hydrated ammonium sulfate particles during the afternoon when gas-phase nitric acid is
at peak photo-chemical production from NOx. Given the abundance of ammonia emissions
and low ambient temperatures, particulate nitrate production in this way is only limited by
the availability of nitric acid. Due to the cool winter conditions there was little secondary
organic aerosol production during this study. Sea salt was shown to dominate the larger
coarse particle mode during on-shore wind at the background coastal monitoring site at
Bodega Bay, north of San Francisco, CA.
Using a regression analysis to find the dependence of particulate SOr concentration
measured over a 3-yr period (2000-2002) at 84 western IMPROVE monitoring sites on the
modeled transport trajectories to the sites for each sample period, Xu et al. (2006, 102706)
were able to infer the source regions that supplied particulate SOr in the western U.S.
Among the source regions included in this analysis was the near coastal Pacific Ocean (i.e.,
a 300 km zone off the coast of California, Oregon, and Washington). Up to half of the
particulate S( )r measured at Southern California monitoring sites was associated with
this source region. As shown in Figure 9"30 the zone of impact from this source region
July 2009
9-55
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
included large regions of California, Arizona, and Nevada. The authors made the case that
high sulfur content fuel used in marine shipping and port emissions may be largely
responsible. As a result, the WRAP RPO emissions inventory was modified to include
marine shipping and a Pacific Offshore source region was added to source attribution by air
quality simulation modeling.
The SOr attribution results of the WRAP air quality modeling (results available on
the Technical Support System (TSS) website, see Table 9-1 for the web-link) credit the
Pacific offshore source region with somewhat smaller contributions than those from the
trajectory regression work by Xu et al. (2006, 102706) with concentrations at the peak
impact site in California that are about 45% compared to 50% by regressions and even
greater differences for more distant monitoring sites. Based on the modeling attribution the
Pacific offshore source region was responsible for 10%-20% of the nitrate measured in
Southern California.
^ •
1
Contribution of the Pacific Coast to Sulfate Concentration
<0.1
O.t - 0.2
0.2 - 0.4
¦ 0.4 - 0.6
¦ 0.6-0.8
¦ 0.8- 1.4
Source: Xuetal. (2006,102706).
Figure 9-30. Contributions of the Pacific Coast area to the ammonium sulfate (Llgjm3)
at 84 remote-area monitoring sites in western U.S. based on trajectory regression for all
sample periods from 2000-2002 (dots denote locations of the IMPROVE aerosol
monitoring sites).
A coordinated effort by federal, state, and county air quality organizations to
determine the causes of haze in the Columbia River Gorge (a deep and narrow gap in the
July 2009
9-56
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Cascade Mountains on the Washington/Oregon border) through extensive multiyear
measurements and high spatial resolution air quality modeling of typical episodes
demonstrated the multitude of emission sources that contribute to its impairment
(Pitchford et al., 2008, 180159). During the summer, gorge winds are generally from the
west and relatively dry More than half of the haze during a typical summer episode is from
a combination of international and other distant sources (-22% at the western end of the
gorge) plus regional natural sources including wildfire and secondary organic PM from
biogenic emissions (-39% at the eastern end of the gorge). The Portland/Vancouver
metropolitan area was responsible for a significant amount of the haze during the summer
(-20% on in the western end of the gorge), while sources within the gorge were responsible
for a moderate amount of haze (-6% and -9% at the western and eastern ends of the gorge).
The wind is much more often from the east during the winter. The highest haze conditions
in the gorge are during the winter and are associated with fog conditions that rapidly
convert precursor gaseous emissions of NOx and SO2 from local and regional combustion
sources and NH4 from local and regional agricultural activities to secondary nitrate and
SO42- PM that persist as a post-fog intense haze. Contributions by these sources east of the
gorge contribute -57% of the haze on the eastern end of the gorge, with half of the nitrate
and SO r particulate from electric utility emissions and most of the rest from
transportation sources. Other sources contributing during the winter haze at the eastern
end of the gorge are from sources outside the modeling domain (i.e., most of Washington
and Oregon) and within the gorge (-23% and -10%, respectively).
An assessment of concurrent measurements at the nearby Mt. Hood IMPROVE
monitoring site (45 km south of the Columbia River at 1531m ASL) shows that Columbia
River Gorge haze conditions and especially the wintertime high nilrale/SO r contributions
to haze are not typical of the generally higher elevation remote areas of the region
(Pitchford et al., 2008, 180159) . However Gorge-like high wintertime nitrate and SO42- are
found at the Hells Canyon IMPROVE site, which is similarly situated in a narrow canyon of
the Snake River almost 400 km east of the Gorge (from the VIEWS web site, see Table 9-1),
implying that there may be a substantial vertical concentration gradient during winter in
this complex terrain.
Several example monitoring locations distributed across the northern and southern
portions of the western U.S. have been selected to illustrate the attribution results from the
WRAP-sponsored attribution analysis tools that estimate the relative responsibility for
July 2009
9-57
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
haze of the various PM species by source region and source type. The selected sites include
Olympic NP (NP), WA; Yellowstone NP, WY; and Badlands NP, SD across the north, and
San Gorgonio Wilderness (W), CA; Grand Canyon NP, AZ and Salt Creek W, NM across the
south as shown in Figure 9"31.
Olympic N.P
Grand Canyon N.P.
2000-2004 Baseline Average
20% Worst Days
IMPROVE Aerosol Extinction (Mm-1)
Ammonium Sulfate
^ Ammonium Nitrate
Organic Material
^ Elemental Carbon
Soil
(Aj Coarse Material
20 60 100
* <3 years
Yellowstone N.P.
San Gorgonio W.
Badlands N.P.
Salt Creek W.
Source: From the TSS website.
Figure 9-31. Shows the IMPROVE monitoring sites in the WRAP region with at least three yr of valid
data and identifies the six sites selected to demonstrate the apportionment tools. Pie
diagrams show the composition for the mean of the 20% worst haze conditions and the
mean light extinction (Mm1) by the size of the circle (see figure key).
WRAP-sponsored CMAQ modeling for 2002 used virtual tracers of SOs and NOx
emissions that tracked the source region and category through the transport and
transformation processes to particulate IKS#" and nitrate. This was used to produce pie
diagrams of particulate SO#-* and nitrate attribution results by source region for each of
July 2009
9-58
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
these sites as shown in Figure 9-32 (produced using the TSS, see Table 9-1). Based on these
sites, over half of the particulate SO r in remote areas of the Pacific coastal states is from
outside of the U.S. (Pacific offshore and outside of the domain). The outside of the domain
values were derived by simulating the fate of the boundary condition concentrations, which
for the WRAP air quality modeling were obtained using output from the GEOS-CHEM
global air quality model (Fiore et al., 2003, 047805). The SO42- fraction from the region
labeled outside of domain was approximately uniform throughout the western U.S. with
site-to-site variation in the fraction caused mostly by variations in total SO r
concentration. The more northerly sites have impacts from Canadian emissions, while the
southern sites have impacts from Mexican emissions. Half of the Salt Creek, New Mexico
SO42- is from the domestic source emissions further to the east, which also contribute about
20% to Badlands particulate S( ) r concentrations. A breakout of the emission sources from
within the WRAP region by source type (not shown) has most of the emissions from point
sources, with the combination of motor vehicle, area and wildfire emissions contributing
from a few percent at the furthest eastern sites to about half at San Gorgonio.
By comparison, the particulate nitrate is much more from domestic regional emission
sources, with ~60%-80% being from emissions within the WRAP region. For the west coast
sites about 25% of the nitrate is from a combination of Pacific offshore emissions (i.e.,
marine shipping) and outside domain regions. Canadian emissions are responsible for about
10%-30% of the particulate nitrate for the three northern sites, but Mexican emissions do
not contribute appreciably to particulate nitrate for the three southern sites. Motor vehicles
are the largest contributing NOx source category responsible for particulate nitrate for
these six WRAP sites, with a combination of point, area and wildfire source categories also
contributing from about 10%"50% of the WRAP regional emissions.
WRAP only used the virtual tracer approach to investigate source locations and
categories for SO2 and NOx emissions. A different type of virtual tracer modeling tool was
used to track the various OC compounds and sort them into three groups for 2002. The first
group labeled primary organics includes all of the organics that are emitted directly as PM
from any source type and location. The second group labeled anthropogenic secondary
organics is PM produced in the atmosphere by aromatic VOCs. The third category labeled
biogenic secondary organics is PM produced in the atmosphere by biogenic VOCs. Organic
PM in the biogenic secondary category includes those that would functionally be considered
man-made emissions (e.g., those from agricultural crops and urban landscapes), though in
July 2009
9-59
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
most remote areas of the west these man-made VOC emissions are small compared to those
of the natural biogenic sources. Figures 9-33, 9-34 and 9-35 show the monthly averaged
apportionment of organic PM for the six selected monitoring locations.
July 2009
9-60
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
(a)
Olympic NP
Yellowstone NP
Badlands NP
WW
Pacific Offshore
2002
2002
2002
CENRAP
Sulfate 1.1 uq/m3
Sulfate 0.6 ua/m3
Sulfate 1.2 ua/m3
Eastern U.S.
Canada
Mexico
San Gorgonio W
Grand Canyon NP
Salt Creek W
Outside Domain
2352
2002
2002
Sulfate 0
.8 ua/m3
Sulfate 0.5 ua/m3
Sulfate 1A uq/m3
(b)
Olympic NP
Yellowstone NP
Badlands NP
/
WRAP
Pacific Offshore
2002
2002
2002
CENRAP
Nitrate 1.6 ua/m3
Nitrate 0.6 ua/m3
Nitrate t .2 ua/m3
Eastern U.S.
Canada
Mexico
San Gorgonio W
Grand Canyon NP
Salt Creek W
/ 1
Outside Domain
2002
2002
2002
Nitrate 1.5 ua/m3
Nitrate 0.4 ua/m3
Nitrate 0.5 ua/m3
Figure 9-32. Particulate SO42' (a} and nitrate (b) source attribution by region using CAMx
modeling for six western remote area monitoring sites: top left to right Olympic HIP, WA;
Yellowstone RIP, WY; Badlands NP, SD; bottom left to right San Gorgonio W, OA; Grand
Canyon NP, AZ; and Salt Creek W, NM. WRAP includes ND, SD, WY, CO, NM and all
states further west. CENRAP includes all states east of WRAP and west of the
Mississippi River including MN. Eastern U.S. includes all states east of CENRAP. The
Pacific Offshore extends 300km to the west of CA, OR, and WA. Outside Domain refers
to the modeling domain, which extend hundreds of kilometers into the Pacific and
Atlantic Oceans and from Hudson Bay Canada to just north of Mexico City. This
figure was assembled from site-specific diagrams produced on the TSS web site (see
Table 9 1) for 2002.
July 2009
9-61
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Organic Aerosol for All Days
Class I Area - Olympic NP, WA
3.20
^ 2.80
CO
f,2-40
2.00
0
1° 1.60
8 1.20
° 0.80
0.40
0.00
Organic Aerosol for All Days
Class I Areas - San Gorgonio W, CA: San Jacinto W, CA
2.80
f? 2-40
-i
g1 2.00
| 1.60
In
1 1.20
o
3 0.80
0.40
0.00
Source: From the TSS website, see Table 9-1.
Figure 9-33. Monthly averaged model predicted organic mass concentration apportioned into primary
and anthropogenic and biogenic secondary PM categories for the Olympic RIP (top) and
San Gorgonio Wilderness (bottom) monitoring sites.
Based on the modeling results for these six sites and confirmed by measurements
(see, e.g., Figure 9-10), a west to east decreasing gradient of organic mass exists with
annual concentrations from ~2 pg/m3 for the coastal state sites to ~1 pg/m3 for the
intermountain west sites to less than 1 pg/m3 for the sites just east of the Rocky Mountains,
discounting the large fire impacts for July at Yellowstone NP which raised its annual mean
to ~2 pg/m3. At all of these remote-area sites anthropogenic secondary PM is estimated to
be a small fraction of the organic mass, with the largest fractional contribution at the San
Gorgonio monitoring site immediately downwind of the major Southern California urban
areas, yet having less than 10% of the monthly mean organic mass from anthropogenic
Lllllllllllll
CN CO
i/j to
CO CO
Anthro. Secondary
Biogenic Secondary
| Anthro. & Bio. Primary
July 2009
9-62
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
secondary PM. Of the six selected monitoring sites, San Gorgonio has the highest fraction of
the organic PM from primary emissions (-57%), followed by Yellowstone (-55%), then the
two eastern-most sites (Badlands -42% and Salt Creek 41%), and with Grand Canyon and
Olympic national parks the lowest fraction by primary emissions (-37%). Yellowstone NP
would have had the lowest fraction of organic PM by primary emissions had it not been for
the month of July (the 11 month mean is 29%) when wild fire smoke contributed. Results
from recent chamber and field studies, and modeling would seem to call into question
apportionment of primary and secondary carbon done by traditional air quality model
simulations of OC, as described above, due to the combined effects of extensive evaporation
of semivolatile primary emissions when diluted and to photochemical reactions of low
volatility gas phase species that substantially increases the amount of secondary organic
PM (Robinson et al., 2007, 191975).
July 2009
9-63
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
14.00
12.00
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
Organic Aerosol for All Days
Class I Areas - Grand Teton NP, WY: Red Rock Lakes NWRW, MT: Teton W, WY: Yellowstone NP.WY
l 11 l 1 1 l
*3- Lj-J OIi
1.80
1.50
1.20
0.90
0.60
0.30
0.00
Organic Aerosol for All Days
Hopi Point#!
1
LJ-J CD h- CO CD O
] Anthro. Secondary
Biogenic Secondary
] Anthro. & Bio. Primary
Source: From the TSS website, see Table 9-1.
Figure 9-34. Monthly averaged model predicted organic mass concentration apportioned into primary
and anthropogenic and biogenic secondary PM categories for the Yellowstone RIP (top)
and Grand Canyon (Hopi Point) (bottom) monitoring sites.
July 2009
9-64
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
0.80
0.70
co 0.60
-I
3 0.50
| 0.40
| 0.30
C
8 0.20
0.10
0.00
Organic Aerosol for All Days
Class I Area - Badlands NP, SD
I MM
ilA ii i i i" i
Organic Aerosol for All Days
Class I Area - Salt Creek NWRW, NM
£ 0.40
0.20
0.00
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
] Anthro. Secondary
Tfr W CD hw
Biogenic Secondary
J Anthro. & Bio. Primary
Source: From the TSS website, see Table 9-1.
Figure 9-35. Monthly averaged model predicted organic mass concentration apportioned into primary
and anthropogenic and biogenic secondary PM categories for the Badland RIP (top) and
Salt Creek Wilderness (bottom) monitoring sites.
Radiocarbon (14C) dating techniques were used to group ambient PM carbon into fossil
and contemporary source categories at 12 IMPROVE monitoring sites across the U.S., 8 of
which are in the WRAP region (Schichtel et al., 2008, 156958). Results of this work showed
that contemporary carbon accounts for about half the carbon in urban areas, 70%"97% in
near-urban areas (i.e., San Gorgonio) and 82%-100% in remote areas. Comparing these
radiocarbon dating results with the WRAP virtual tracer modeling results for organic
aerosol (above), and presuming that the modeled anthropogenic secondary organic is fossil
carbon and the biogenic secondary is contemporary carbon, suggests that a large fraction of
July 2009
9-65
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
the model-determined regional primary organic PM is from contemporary carbon sources
(e.g., smoke from wildfires).
Schichtel et al. (2008, 156958) compared radiocarbon measurements at two sets of
urban/rural paired sites in the west (Mount Rainer/Seattle, and Tonto/Phoenix). Figure 9".'Hi
shows that most of total carbon urban excess (i.e., urban site concentration minus the
regional site concentration) in the summer is from fossil carbon sources (87% and 79%,
respectively), while in the winter there is a surprisingly high fraction of the urban excess at
both sites that is from contemporary carbon sources (41% and 47%, respectively). This
implies that urban, and therefore anthropogenic, activities generate almost as much PM2.5
carbon from contemporary sources (e.g., residential wood combustion) as from the fossil
sources during the winter for these two western urban areas.
July 2009
9-66
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Summer
I
ro o
O |-
|— TO
O
1*-
CO
£
O)
a.
ID
in
II
C0
X
E
O)
a.
CO
C\
o
E
0
c
o
o
5 -
E 4
3 3 H
|2
° 1
0
Summer
I
sS
H ®
O
ss
3
1
CO
E
2
CO
Ol
II
V
xs
¦
xs
Fossil
i
E
0)
c
O
o
Winter
TO S
(J
c/)
o
E
a)
c
o
O
Winter
Source: Schichtel et al. (2008,156958).
Comparison of carbon concentrations between Seattle (Puget Sound site) and Mt. Rainer
(left) and between Phoenix and Tonto (right) showing the background site concentration
(gray) and the urban excess concentration (black) for total, fossil and contemporary
carbon during the summer and winter studies.
9-67
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Proctor Maple
0.94
Great Smoky
Mountains
0.90
Tonto
Fraction Contemporary
Puget Sound
0.51
Mount
Sula
Briganline
0.79
O
| > 0.90 + 0.24
0.75 * 0.90 + 0.22
0.60 - 0.75 * 0.21
0.45 - 0.60 + 0.20
¦ < 0.45 + 0.19
Phoenix
0 56 0.84
O O
Proctor Maple
0.87
Rocky
Mountains
0.93
Tonto
Fraction Contemporary
Puget Sound
0.53
Mount
Kairif:r
BrlganOne
0.78
O
¦ > 0.90 t 0,15
0.75 - 0.90 + 0.14
0.60 - 0.75 t 0.13
0.45 - 0.60 + 0.12
¦ < 0.45 + 0.11
Phoenix
0.49 0.71
Q O
Great Smoky
Mounts ins
0.82
O
Figure 9-37. Average contemporary fraction of PM2.5 carbon for the summer (top) and winter
(bottom), estimated from IMPROVE monitoring data (6/04 to 2/06) based on EC/TC ratios.
The contemporary values from radiocarbon dating for the 12 monitoring sites are
indicated in by colored circles with the site names. Color contours are shown to aid in
showing sites with similar values. Site locations are indicated by circles for remote area
sites and triangles for urban sites.
July 2009
9-68
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Contemporary carbon estimates for all of the IMPROVE network monitoring sites for
data from two summer seasons (June, July and August, 2004/2005) and two winter seasons
(December, 2004/2005, January and February, 2005/2006) were calculated from the
measured EC to total carbon (EC/TC) ratios using the 12-site empirical relationship
between radiocarbon determined contemporary carbon fraction and IMPROVE measured
EC/TC ratio (Schichtel et al., 2008, 156958). The results are displayed in color contour maps
in Figure 9"37, which also shows the radiocarbon determined contemporary carbon for the
12 sites. The lowest contemporary carbon estimates (<60%) in both seasons are for urban
areas. In the rural West, most of the sites have over 90% of their PM carbon from
contemporary carbon sources during the summer and from 60%-over 90% during the
winter. In the rural East, most of the sites have 45%-90% of their PM carbon from
contemporary carbon sources during the summer and from 60%-over 90% in the winter.
Schichtel et al. (2008, 156958) showed a strong relationship between the site-averaged
EC/TC ratios and the site-averaged fraction of fossil carbon separately for the summer and
winter data sets (i.e., R2 of 0.71 and 0.87, respectively). Using regression analysis they
estimated that the summer and winter EC/TC ratios associated with purely fossil carbon
were 0.35 ± 0.039 and 0.46 ± 0.028, respectively, and for purely contemporary carbon the
EC/TC ratios were 0.12 ± 0.011 and 0.19 ± 0.0095. These ratios are shown to be consistent
with corresponding ratios from the literature for source testing primary fossil and
contemporary combustion sources respectively. They are also shown to be consistent with
the 90 percentile value of the EC/TC ratio from the urban IMPROVE monitoring sites (0.41
and 0.44 for summer and winter) and the 10th percentile values of the EC/TC ratio for
remote areas IMPROVE monitoring sites (0.07 and 0.16 for summer and winter), which
they argue are dominated by fossil and contemporary carbon, respectively.
The largest sources of contemporary carbon are primary emissions from biomass
burning and secondary organic aerosol from biogenic precursor gases (e.g., terpenes from
conifer forests). Schichtel et al. (2008, 156958) estimated the 12-site overall contribution by
secondary organic PM to the summer contemporary carbon fraction as 36 ± 6.4% by
assuming the EC/TC ratio for contemporary carbon during the winter represented the ratio
of primary emissions only (i.e., no secondary organic PM formation in the winter) and that
the EC/TC ratio for primary emissions is independent of seasons. This approach should
provide a lower bound estimate of the secondary OC species. The same method applied to
the fossil carbon fraction yielded an estimate of 23 ± 10% of the fossil carbon PM from
July 2009
9-69
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
secondary organic formation in the atmosphere during the summer. These estimates
correspond to over 40% of the contemporary and over 35% of the fossil OC being from
secondary PM formation.
July 2009
9-70
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
"E
o 50.00
Q_
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
Sources and Areas of Potential Organic Carbon Emissions on Worst 20% Visibility Days
Class I Area - Olympic NP, WA
o.oo l-1
WRAPTSS-3Q1J2EB
Sources and Areas of Potential Elemental Carbon Emissions on Worst 20% Visibility1 Days
Class I Area - Olympic NP, WA
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
¦
Jl
Bb
WRAPTSS-301flE5 ^
-------
Sources and Areas of Potential Organic Carbon Emissions on Worst 20% Visibility Days
Class I Areas - San Gorgonio W, OA: San Jacinto W, OA
no. no
HU LIU
a u. i J u
7IJ. IJIJ
aij.uu
" 50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00 ¦
WRAP TSS - 301J2IJB
CA - 2000-04
2018 PRP
PO - 2000-04
2018 PRP
Sources and Areas of Potential Elemental Carbon Emissions on Worst 20% Visibility Days
Class I Areas - San Gorgonio W, CA: San Jacinto W, CA
100.00
90.00
a U. U U
7IJ. IJIJ
bU.UU
" 50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00 ¦
WRAP TSS - 301J2IJB
CA - 2000-04
2018 PRP
PO - 2000-04
2018 PRP
Bra Dust ¦ Road Dust | On-Road Mobile ~ WRAP Area O&G ~ Biogenic BAnthroFire
~ Fugitive Dust Off-Road Mobile ~ Off-Shore []Area ~ Natural Fire |] Point
Source: From the TSS website (see Table 9-1).
Figure 9-39. Results of the weighted emissions potential tool applied to primary OC emissions (top)
and EC emissions (bottom) for the baseline and projected 2018 emissions
inventories for San Gorgonio W. Only source regions (WRAP states and other regions)
with the largest estimated contributions are shown (i.e., California and Pacific Off-Shore
from left to right). The scale is normalized (i.e., unitless) one over distance weighted
emissions multiplied by trajectory residence time.
July 2009
9-72
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
WRAP applied a weighted emissions potential analysis tool that combined gridded
emissions data with back-trajectory analysis that simulated the transport pathway to the
various monitoring sites to infer likely source region and emission categories for the 20%
best and 20% worst haze conditions for each of the IMPROVE PM speciation monitoring
locations in the West. Unlike the virtual tracer approach that uses a full regional air
quality simulation model, this method does not explicitly account for chemistry or removal
processes and it does not incorporate the sophisticated dispersion estimates (i.e., it uses one
over distance weighting for dispersion), so it should be considered a screening tool that has
been found to be helpful in identifying the likely sources contributing to haze. More
information on this approach is available elsewhere (see the link to the TSS in Table 9-1).
Primary organic and EC PM species results from the weighted emissions potential tool for
the worst 20% haze days using the 2000-2004 base years' emissions and trajectories, and
the same trajectories with 2018-projected emissions for each of the six selected western
monitoring locations are shown in Figures 9"38 through 9-43.
For Olympic NP (Figure 9"38), most of the primary organic as well as most of the EC
PM is likely to be from the state of Washington during the worst haze days. This is because
the multi-day trajectories that transport emissions on its worst days tend to be short
(within 200 km based on maps available on TSS, see Table 9-1). Area sources, which include
emissions from residential wood heating, watercraft, non-mobile urban and other sources
too small to be labeled as point sources, are the big contributors to primary organic, while
on- and off-road mobile emissions plus area sources are large contributors to the EC at
Olympic NP The 2018 projected growth in area sources and decrease in emissions of mobile
source emissions is anticipated to increase the haze by primary organic while reducing the
haze by EC at Olympic NP The same analysis applied to San Gorgonio (Figure 9-39), is
similar in that the majority of the emissions with the potential to contribute to primary
organic and EC PM is from the home state, California in this case. However, the likely
importance of natural fire emissions for carbonaceous PM species sites is substantially
greater at San Gorgonio W. than it was for Olympic NP
The weighted emissions potential results applied to Yellowstone NP and Grand
Canyon NP (Figures 9-40 and 9"4l) show the likely dominance of natural fire emissions in
the intermountain western U.S. to primary organic and EC PM during worst haze
conditions for these two locations. Numerous states have emissions that have the potential
to contribute noticeably to these carbonaceous species, due to relatively long multi-day
July 2009
9-73
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
trajectories (500 km to 1000 km) on worst haze days, though for both sites the home state
has the greatest potential based on this inverse distance weighting approach. On- and
off-road mobile sources in Arizona and California have significant potential to contribute to
Grand Canyon carbonaceous particles, especially EC concentrations, probably due to some
of the trajectories being over the populated areas of these two states to the south and
southwest of Grand Canyon.
July 2009
9-74
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Sources and Areas of Potential Organic Carbon Emissions on Worst 20% Visibility Days
Class I Areas - Grand Teton NP, WY: Red Rock Lakes NWRW, MT: Teton W, WY: Yellowstone NP, WY
70.00
60.00
50.00
1 40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
WRAP TSS - 3Q1JHDB
Sources and Areas of Potential Elemental Carbon Emissions on Worst 20% Visibility Days
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
WRAP TSS - 30U2DB
BWBDust ¦ Road Dust | On-Road Mobile ~ WRAP Area O&G ~ Biogenic BAnthroFire
~ Fugitive Dust Off-Road Mobile ~off-Shore []Area ~ Natural Fire |]Point
Source: From the TSS website (see Table 9-1).
Figure 9-40. Results of the weighted emissions potential tool applied to primary OC emissions (top)
and EC emissions (bottom) for the baseline and projected 2018 emissions inventories for
Yellowstone RIP. Only source regions (WRAP states and other regions) with the largest
estimated contributions are shown (i.e., California, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Utah,
Washington, and Wyoming from left to right). The scale is normalized (i.e., unitless) one
over distance weighted emissions multiplied by trajectory residence time.
July 2009
9-75
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
60.00
50.00
40.00
IE
^ 30.00 -H
20.00
10.00
0.00
Sources and Areas of Potential Organic Carbon Emissions on Worst 20% Visibility Days
Class I Area - Grand Canyon NP, AZ
WRAP TSS- 4/1ODS
Sources and Areas of Potential Elemental Carbon Emissions on Worst 20% Visibility Days
Class I Area - Grand Canyon NP, AZ
50.00
45.00 +
40.00
35.00
30.00 4-
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00 --
0.00
WRAP TSS -
|WB Dust | Road Dust | On-Road Mobile QWRAP Area O&G D Biogenic Q Anthro Fire
~ Fugitive Dust ~ Off-Road Mobile ~ Off-Shore DArea ~ Natural Fire |] Point
Source: From the TSS website (see Table 9-1).
Figure 9-41. Results of the weighted emissions potential tool applied to primary OC emissions (top)
and EC emissions (bottom) for the baseline and projected 2018 emissions inventories for
Grand Canyon RIP. Only source regions (WRAP states and other regions) with the largest
estimated contributions are shown (i.e., Arizona, California, Mexico, New Mexico,
Nevada, Oregon, Pacific Off-shore and Utah from left to right). The scale is normalized
(i.e., unitless) one over distance weighted emissions multiplied by trajectory residence
time.
July 2009
9-76
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
30.00
27.00
24.00
21.00
18.00
0)
2 15.00
a)
CL
12.00
9.00
6.00
3.00
0.00
WRAPTSS-aaiflDDS
Sources and Areas of Potential Organic Carbon Emissions on Worst 20% Visibility Days
Class I Area - Badlands IMP, SD
T—r
=
•¦=1-
Cl
"¦=}¦
Cl
¦•=1-
CL
Cl
Cl
-3-
Cl
Cl
¦*3"
o
Ctl
O
C£
O
CE
O
C£
O
CC
O
O
O
o
Cl
o
Cl
O
Cl
o
Cl
O
Cl
O
CL
o
LL
o
o
CO
o
CO
o
CO
o
CO
O
CO
O
CO
o
CO
o
o
o
o
o
O
o
o
o
CM
O
CN
CN
O
CN
CN
O
CN
CN
O
CN
CM
O
CN
CN
o
CN
CN
o
CN
CN
M
<
2
o
to
Q
1—
<
<
LU
o
3
2
a:
O
Sources and Areas of Potential Elemental Carbon Emissions on Worst 20% Visibility Days
Class I Area - Badlands NP, SD
30.00
27.00
24.00
21.00
18.00
0J
£ 15.00
CD
CL
12.00
9.00
6.00
3.00
0.00
mU
'
~n
Q
— =
aa
Ct O 0£ O
M
<
WRAP TSS-3GimE
<
'w'
CL
"¦=*-
Cl
"=1"
Cl
CL
Cl
Cl
¦¦=1-
Cl
-¦=1-
Cl
¦¦=1-
Cl
-¦=1-
Cl
Cl
•*=*"
Cl
Ltl
o
or
O
or
O
ctr
o
C£
O
Ctl
o
IT
o
CE
o
cc
O
O
C£
O
Ltl
Cl
o
Cl
o
CL
O
CL
o
CL
O
CL
o
CL
o
CL
o
Cl
O
CL
o
Cl
o
CL
CO
o
CO
o
CO
o
CO
o
CO
O
CO
o
CO
o
CO
o
CO
O
CO
o
CO
o
CO
o
o
o
o
O
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
CN
o
CN
O
CN
o
CN
O
CM
O
CN
O
CM
O
CN
O
CN
O
CN
O
CN
O
CN
i
CN
i
CN
i
CN
r
CN
i
CN
i
CN
i
CN
i
CN
i
CN
i
CN
i
CN
o
CO
Q
1—
Ci
>
CC
Cl
1—
<
C_5
3
LU
-Z.
IZ
o
to
Ci
£
HWBDust
Fugitive Dust
| Road Dust
Off-Road Mobile
| On-Road Mobile WRAP Area O&G Biogenic | Anthro Fire
Off-Shore [ Area C Natural Fire | Point
Source: From the TSS website (see Table 9-1).
Figure 9-42. Results of the weighted emissions potential tool applied to primary 0C emissions (top)
and EC emissions (bottom) for the baseline and projected 2018 emissions inventories for
Badlands RIP. Only source regions (WRAP states and other regions) with the largest
estimated contributions are shown (i.e., Arizona, California, Canada, CenRAP, Colorado,
eastern U.S., Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, Nevada, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah,
Washington, and Wyoming from left to right). The scale is normalized (i.e., unitless) one
over distance weighted emissions multiplied by trajectory residence time.
July 2009
9-77
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Sources and Areas of Potential Organic Carbon Emissions on Worst 20% Visibility Days
Class I Area - Salt Creek NWRW, NM
n
a
u
-
J
L.
=r
sJ
— —
M-
~~
nn
40.00
36.00
32.00
28.00
24 00
r
a."
a5
20.00
16.00
12.00
8.00
4.00
0.00
WRAP TSS-3G1OT33
36.00
33.00
30.00
Sources and Areas of Potential Elemental Carbon Emissions on Worst 20% Visibility Days
Class I Area - Salt Creek NWRW, NM
27.00
24. UU
21 .00
S 18.00
is.uu
12.00
nn
— —
= =
an
1=1
<
- 3C31SDS
<
U
o
u
X
LU
IE
O
BWB Dust | Road Dust | On-Road Mobile _| WRAP Area O&G Biogenic BAnthroFire
Fugitive Dust Off-Road Mobile Off-Shore Area Natural Fire [J] Point
July 2009
9-78
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Source: From the TSS website (see Table 9-1).
Figure 9-43. Results of the weighted emissions potential tool applied to primary OC emissions (top)
and EC emissions (bottom) for the baseline and projected 2018 emissions
inventories for Salt Creek W. Only source regions (WRAP states and other regions) with
the largest estimated contributions are shown (i.e., Arizona, California, CenRAP,
Colorado, eastern U.S., Idaho, Mexico, Montana, New Mexico, Nevada, Oregon, Utah,
and Wyoming from left to right). The scale is normalized (i.e., unitless) one over distance
weighted emissions multiplied by trajectory residence time.
For the most easterly of the selected WRAP sites, Badlands NP and Salt Creek, the
weighted emissions potential results for primary organic and EC (Figures 9-42 and 9-43)
show potential contributions from a greater number of states and multi-state regions than
for selected sites further to the west. This may be due in part to trajectories associated with
worst haze conditions for these two sites being moderately long (-500 km) and in multiple
directions. Natural fire emissions have the greatest potential to contribute to organic
species PM at Badlands NP, but are less likely to be dominant at Salt Creek or at either site
in its contribution to EC PM concentrations. The contributions by emissions from area and
mobile sources from the home states and states to the east (Central States Regional Air
Partnership states are labeled "CEN" in the figures) are potentially greater than by natural
fire! this is especially true for contributions to EC PM.
WRAP applied the weighted emissions potential tool to assess likely source types and
regions contributing to coarse mass concentrations. The results for the six selected
monitoring sites (not shown) are as follows. Most dust at Olympic NP is likely to be from
fugitive dust sources in Washington state, while at San Gorgonio it is likely more from road
dust with smaller amounts from fugitive dust sources. The amount from wind-blown dust is
small for both of these far westerly sites. Wind-blown dust is likely the largest source
contributing to coarse mass at Grand Canyon NP, Badlands NP and Salt Creek Wilderness
with most of it originating in the home-state for those sites. The weighted emissions
potential results for coarse mass at Yellowstone are different from those of the other five
selected sites in that Idaho and Montana each have a higher potential to contribute to
coarse mass on the worst haze days than the home state (Wyoming), and that wind-blown
and road dust both contribute substantially as does fugitive dust and natural fire.
In another WRAP-sponsored effort to better understand the causes of remote area
haze in the western U.S., each of the worst haze days for all western IMPROVE monitoring
sites where dust (defined as the sum of coarse mass and fine soil PM) was the largest
July 2009
9-79
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
contributor to light extinction was separately assessed to categorize the most likely dust
source (Kavouras et al., 2007, 156630; Kavouras et al., 2009, 191976) and the Causes of
Haze Website - see Table 9-1). Elemental composition was used to assess the likelihood that
the dust was associated with long-range transport from Asia. A regression analysis at each
site between dust concentrations and coincident local wind speed was used to generate
site-specific estimates of local windblown dust for each sample period. Finally, back
trajectory analysis combined with maps constructed of wind erosion potential
(i.e., developed by combining soil types and land cover classifications) are used in a manner
similar to the weighted emissions potential analysis to identify the likelihood of regionally
transported wind-blown dust as the source. These assessments were conducted on each of
the 610 so-called "worst dust haze days" at 70 monitoring sites for data from 2001-2003 to
classify each day by its likely contributions from Asian dust, local windblown dust, upwind
transport and undetermined. The undetermined category includes those sample periods
that failed to be classified into one of the other three source categories suggesting that
mechanically suspended dust activities (e.g., unpaved road dust, agricultural, construction
and mining activities) may be responsible.
Of the 610 "worst dust haze days" at the 70 WRAP monitoring sites, 55 sample
periods are classified as Asian dust influenced, almost exclusively in the spring! 201 sample
period are classified as local windblown dust, mostly in the spring but some in all seasons!
240 sample periods are classified as upwind transported dust, with a broader seasonal
distribution centered on summer and few instances during winter! and 114 are in the
undetermined category with most in summer and least in winter. Most dust days occurred
in the deserts of Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, western Texas and southern California,
and these were dominated by local and regionally transported wind-blown dust (e.g., 84%
for Salt Creek W). Asian dust caused only a few of the worst dust days during the 3-yr
assessment period, though it is an important source (i.e., 10-40% of the worst dust days) for
sites in the more northern regions of the West with greater vegetative land-cover where
local and regionally transported wind-blown dust was infrequent. The frequency of worst
dust events classified as undetermined was greatest for sites in the vicinity of large urban
and agricultural areas such as those in California and southern Arizona.
July 2009
9-80
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Sulfate Haze Source Attribution
Organics + LAC + Nitrates +
/ Fine Soil + Coarse
~ Carbon ¦ Other Mexico
¦ Texas ¦ Eastern US
~ Western US ¦ Other
Clear Air
August 9
September 9
October 9
Source: Pitchford et al. (2005,156874)
Figure 9-44. BRAVO study haze contributions for Big Bend NP, TX during a 4-mo period in 1999.
Shown are impacts by various particulate SO*2" sources, as well as the total light
extinction (black line) and Rayleigh or clear air light scattering.
July 2009
9-81
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
"ACAD 1
2.5
2.0
1.7
1.5
1.2
1.0
ug/rn3
2004 Annual
amrnN03f
Figure 9-45. Maps of spatial patterns for average annual particulate nitrate measurements (top), and
for ammonia emissions for April 2002 from the WRAP emissions inventory (bottom).
July 2009
9-82
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
N02
3.125
1.875
2.500
1.500
WRAP 36k base02a All Sources Emissions WRAP 36k base02a All Sources Emissions
2002 Yearly Total 2002 Yearly Total
PAbJE December 31,2002 0:00:00 PAbJE December 31,2002 0:00:00
mcnc Min= 0.000 at (4,1), Max= 4.995 at (130,68) MCnc Min= 0.000 at (4,1), Max= 4.041 at (130,68)
1 5.000112
4.375
¦ 3.000112
I 2.625
3.750
2.250
1.875
1.125
1.250
0.625
0.000 1
LOG(tons/yeaf)
0.750
0.375
0.000 1
LOG(tons/yeat)
Figure 9-46. Maps of spatial patterns of annual NO (left) and NO2 (right) emissions for 2002 from the
WRAP emissions inventory.
Source attribution of the particulate S()¦>'-- contribution to haze at Big Bend NP, TX
was a primary motivation for the BRAVO study. Schichtel et al. (2005, 156957) showed that
during the four-month field monitoring study (July-October, 1999) SOa emissions sources in
the U.S. and Mexico were responsible for -55% and -38% of the particulate SO;:; .
respectively. Among U.S. source regions, Texas was responsible for -16%, eastern U.S. -
30%, and the western U.S. -9%. A large coal fired power plant, the Carbon facility in
Mexico, just south of Eagle Pass, TX, was responsible for about -19%, making it the largest
single contributor. Pitchford et al. (2005, 156874) put these results into the context of other
component contributions to regional haze, plus seasonal and longer-term variations in haze
by particulate components. Figure 9-44 shows the temporal variation of the contributions
by the various SO2 emissions source regions plus the Carbon facility during the BRAVO
study period. The largest particulate SOr peak haze periods are dominated by infrequent
large contribution by emission sources in TX and eastern U.S., while Mexican sources
including the Carbon facility are more frequent contributors to haze, but at generally lower
light extinction values. Particulate nitrate contributions to haze at Big Bend NP are among
the lowest measured in the U.S. (-3% of light extinction on average and for worst haze
episodes).
Nitrate concentrations are a significant contributor to light extinction further to the
north of Texas in the center of the country. While SO r can be in particulate form though
not fully neutralized by ammonia, nitric acid from NOx emissions requires neutralization
July 2009
9-83
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
by ammonium to become particulate ammonium nitrate. One way to explore the causes of
the Midwest nitrate bulge is to compare its spatial distribution with the spatial
distributions of NOx and ammonia emissions. Figure 9-45 shows a map of the annual
average particulate nitrate concentrations (top) with a map of ammonia emissions directly
below it. Animal agriculture is responsible for most of the ammonia emissions in the
Midwest. The striking similarity between the ambient particulate nitrate concentration and
the ammonia emissions spatial patterns with regional maximum centered on Iowa is in
contrast to the NOx (i.e., NO + NO2) emissions spatial patterns, shown in Figure 9-46. NOx
emissions are high over a broad region of the country associated with the larger population
densities and greater numbers of fossil fuel electric generation plant generally to the east of
the Midwest nitrate bulge. While both ammonia and nitric acid are needed to form
particulate ammonium nitrate, the maps suggest the Midwest nitrate bulge is due
primarily to the abundance of free ammonia (i.e., the amount beyond what is required to
neutralize the acidic particulate SOr ). By contrast the region to the east of the Midwest
nitrate bulge should have plenty of nitric acid given the higher emissions of NOx, but
apparently has a deficiency of free ammonia. The few eastern monitoring sites with locally
high particulate nitrate (near southeastern PA) are located within a small region of high
density animal agricultural that shows up as a high ammonia emissions region in
Figure 9-45. Note that California's South Coast and Central Valley have both high
ammonia and high NOx emissions, explaining the high particulate nitrate contribution to
haze there.
To better understand the role of ammonia in the formation of the Midwest nitrate
bulge, the Midwest RPO and Central States Regional Air Partnership deployed a
measurement program from late 2003 through early 2005 at 10 locations (9 rural and 1
urban) in the region (see Figure 9*47) to monitor particulate SO r , nitrate, and ammonium
ions, plus the precursor gases sulfur dioxide, nitric acid, and ammonia (Kenski et al., 2004,
192078; Sweet et al., 2005, 180038). These data have been used as input for thermodynamic
equilibrium modeling to assess the changes in PM concentrations that would result from
changes to precursor concentrations (Blanchard and Tanenbaum, 2006, 192181; Blanchard
et al., 2007, 098659). Blanchard and Tanenbaum (2006, 192181) and Blanchard et al. (2007,
098659) conclude that the current conditions at nine of the ten sites are near the point of
transition between the precursor species (nitric acid and ammonia) that limits the
formation of particulate nitrate. If excess ammonia increases, either by greater ammonia
July 2009
9-84
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
emissions or by anticipated decreases in SO2 emissions, then nitric acid concentration
would need to be reduced (via lower NOx emissions) in order to reduce the particulate
nitrate concentration.
Given the comparability of particulate S() r and nitrate with regard to their light
extinction efficiencies, their visibility impacts are proportional to the sum of their mass
concentrations. A reduction in SO r caused by SO2 emission reductions would reduce the
particulate S() r concentration, though according to the thermodynamic equilibrium
modeling for these sites the particulate nitrate concentration will be increased somewhat.
However the total particulate SO r plus nitrate concentration would be reduced so
visibility impacts would be decreased. At current ammonium concentrations the predicted
response of changes to SC>42~ and nitric acid concentrations (i.e., SO2 and NOx emissions
changes) are similar in respect to the resulting magnitude of changes to the total
particulate S() r plus nitrate concentrations. At all but two sites the total particulate S() r
plus nitrate concentrations would decrease if either ammonia or nitric acid where reduced.
Figure 9-47. Midwest ammonia monitoring network.
A further degree of complications in understanding the response of particulate nitrate
to changes in precursor concentrations results from the temperature and humidity
dependence of the partition between particulate ammonium nitrate and the disassociated
Source: Kenski et al. (2004,192078)
July 2009
9-85
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
gaseous nitric acid and ammonia. This dependence causes seasonal and even diurnal
differences in the expected responses of particulate nitrate concentrations to changes in
precursor concentrations. As expected during the colder times of the year the total
particulate concentrations are more sensitive to changes in ammonia and nitric acid
concentrations than during the warmer seasons when SO-r ¦ concentrations are greater.
As shown in Figure 9-<18, results of an air transport assessment to identify emission
source areas associated with high particulate nitrate at five monitoring locations in the
East (four remote-area sites and Toronto, Canada) implicate the high ammonia emissions
region of the Midwest as a common source region (Canada-US Air Quality Committee,
Subcommittee 2: Scientific, 2004, 190519). This assessment does not preclude local sources
of the precursor gases responsible for particulate ammonium nitrate, but does suggest that
long-range transport of particulate nitrate or ammonia from the high emissions region of
the Midwest is also contributing to eastern nitrate episodes.
Upwind Probability Fields for Ammonium Nitrate
Lye Brook
Source: Canada-U.S. Air Committee (2004,190519).
Figure 9-48. Upwind transport probability fields associated with high particulate
nitrateconcentrations measured at Toronto, Canada; Boundary Water Canoe Area, MN;
Shenandoah NP, VA; Lye Brook, VT; and Great Smoky Mountains RIP, TN.
July 2009
9-86
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
In a similar air transport assessment for measurements at Underbill, VT and at
Brigantine, N J, Hopke et al. (2005, 156567) identified separate regions associated with
particulate SO#~ accompanied by trace particulate components associated with coal
burning (e.g., selenium) and accompanied by trace particulate components associated with
oil burning (e.g., vanadium). As shown in Figure 9-49, the coal-burning related particulate
S( ) i- for these two monitoring sites is associated with long-range transport from the Ohio
River Valley, while oil-burning related particulate SOi2 is from more nearby emissions in
the high population region of coastal New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and
Connecticut.
COAL
Hopke, et al. (2005,156567).
Figure 949. Trajectory probability fields for periods with high particulate SO42' measured at
Underbill, VT and Brigantine, NJ (shown as white stars) associated with oil-burning
trace components (left) and with coal-burning trace components (right). Shown for
comparison are the interpolated SO2 emissions areal density contours for oil combustion
sources (emissions times 10) and coal combustion sources, displayed as yellow and red
contour lines, respectively.
The Regional Aerosol Intensive Network (RAIN) was established by MANE-VU to
generate enhanced continuous visibility, plus fine particle mass and composition monitoring
data at a string of three monitoring locations along the transport path from the Ohio River
Valley to coastal Maine (NESCAUM, , 156802). The dominant role of particulate SO*- in
the northeast is well demonstrated by a scatter plot of RAIN data that shows the
July 2009
9-87
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
relationship between particulate S() r extinction, calculated using the IMPROVE
algorithm plotted against directly measured particle light scattering for hourly data over a
eight month period beginning in July 2004 at the Acadia NP, ME monitoring site (see
Figure 9-50). Particulate S() r explains 90% of the variance in particulate light scattering
even though it is responsible for only about 64% of the total light extinction (annual
averaged value from the VIEWS web site). Adding the contribution by the second-largest
regional contributor to light extinction, particulate OC with about 14%, does not improve
the variance explained, but does increase the slope to 0.78. The noticeable difference
between these two plots is that the particulate S() r alone underestimates light scattering
during low haze periods (points on the plot are below the regression line for light scattering
<70Mm"1), while the agreement is improved with the addition of particulate OC
contributions to haze (regression slope is nearer to one and reduced bias for low haze
periods). This implies that particulate S() r and any other co-varying PM species are
largely responsible for the highly impacted periods, while OC and other co-varying PM
species contribute more during the less extreme haze periods. Particulate nitrate
contribution to light extinction at Acadia is about 10% on average.
Nephelometer Bip versus SULFATE Bs
Nephelometer Bsp vs (SULFATE + OMC) Bsp
y = 0.64x - 1.87
R' = 0.90
2-Hour Nephelometer Bsp (1/Mmeters)
9
UJ
»-
<
y = 0.78x + 4.57
R2 = 0.89 OS ~
n = 1627 °
0
^ S-"b
££> 0
Mb
0
SO 100 150 200 250 300 3.
2-Hr Nephelometer (1/Mmeters)
Source: RAIN Preliminary Data Analysis Report (NESCAUM,, 156802)
Figure 9-50. Scatter plots of particulate SO42 (left) and particulate nitrate and organic mass (right)
versus nephelometer measured particle light scattering for Acadia RIP, ME.
Particulate nitrate concentrations are considerably lower in the SOr "dominated
warmer southeastern U.S. than in the Northeast and upper Midwest. Blanchard et al.
(2007, 098659) conducted thermodynamic equilibrium modeling on data from the eight
July 2009
9-88
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
SEARCH monitoring sites and found that total particulate nitrate plus S( )r is much more
responsive to changes in SO2 concentrations than to changes in nitric acid concentrations,
which in turn is more responsive than changes in ammonia concentrations.
The VISTAS RPO commissioned an emissions sensitivity study using CMAQ
modeling on winter and summer 2009 emissions projected from the 2002 emissions
inventory (NCDENR, 2007, 156798). Figure 9"51 contains bar plots for two North Carolina
Class I areas that indicate projected changes in light extinction for the worst haze day due
to 30% emissions reductions by particulate species, source types and location across the
Southeastern states modeling domain (i.e., as far west as Texas, as far north as
Pennsylvania, as far south as the Florida Keys, and as far east as -300 km from the North
Carolina coast). Great Smoky Mountains in the southern Appalachian Mountains has the
greatest sensitivity to changes by SO2 emissions from electrical generation units (EGU) and
to a lesser extent other SO2 emission sources in the region. Reductions of NOx emissions
from ground or point sources are not nearly as effective as SO2 reductions in reducing the
light extinction at Great Smoky Mountains. This is due principally to the worst days at
Great Smoky Mountains occurring during the summer, when temperatures are too high to
support high particulate nitrate concentrations. For the same reason, ammonia emission
reductions are also ineffective. Swanquarter Wilderness, NC is a coastal location where
some of the worst haze days are during the winter and include contributions from
particulate ammonium nitrate. Both SO2 and ammonia emissions reductions would be
effective at reducing worst haze days at the Swanquarter Wilderness, though NOx
emissions are not as effective presumably because the atmosphere is ammonia-limited for
particulate nitrate production.
July 2009
9-89
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Great Smoky Mtns, TN (20% Worst Days)
-12.00 r
-10.00 --
-8.00 -
-6.00 -
1
-4.00 -
CD
<
-2.00 -
0.00 ^
//,•,
¦ Bio VOC.
~ Anthro VOC
¦ BCs
¦ MRPO
¦ M-VU
~ CEN
¦ VISTAS
¦ wv
~ VA
~ TN
~ SC
¦ NC
¦ MS
~ KY
~ GA
¦ FL
~ AL
Swanquarter, NC (20% Worst Days)
¦ Bio VOC
~ Anthro VOC
¦ BCs
¦ MRPO
¦ M-VU
~ CEN
~ VISTAS
¦ WV
~ VA
~ TN
~ SC
¦ NC
~ MS
~ KY
~ GA
~ FL
~ AL
Source: NCDENR (2007.156798).
Figure 9-51. CMAQ air quality modeling projections of visibility responses on the 20% worst haze
days at Great Smoky Mountains RIP, l\IC (top) and Swanquarter Wilderness, l\IC (bottom)
to 30% reductions from a projected 2009 emission inventory of visibility-reducing
pollutants by source category and geographic areas.
9.2.4. Urban Visibility Valuation and Preference
The Clean Air Act §302(h) defines public welfare to include the effects of air pollution
on "...visibility, ... and personal comfort and wellbeing." Though good visibility conditions in
Class I (e.g., NPs) and wilderness areas have long been recognized as important to the
public welfare (see discussions in EPA (2004, 056905; 2005, 090209) and Chestnut and
July 2009
9-90
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Dennis (1997, 014525), visibility conditions in urban areas also contribute to the public
welfare. Although visibility impairment may be caused by either natural or manmade
conditions (or both), it is only impairment that occurs as a result of air pollution (either
alone or in combination with water vapor or other atmospheric conditions) that can be
mitigated by regulations such as the RHR (40 CFR 51.300 through 309) or the Secondary
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The term visual air quality (VAQ) is
used here to refer to the visibility effects caused solely by air quality conditions, so for
example it excludes the reduced visibility caused by fog. Visibly poor air quality causes
people to be concerned about substantive health risks, but degraded VAQ adversely affects
people in additional ways. These include the aesthetic and wellbeing benefits of better
visibility, improved road and air safety, and enhanced recreation in activities like hiking
and bicycling. Because the human health impacts of air pollution are assessed under the
Primary NAAQS, it is necessary to separate out these non-health components associated
with the visibility condition produced by a given amount of air pollution when assessing the
need for additional regulation to protect the public welfare effect of visibility under the
Secondary NAAQS. The degree to which previous human preference and valuation studies
for VAQ have adequately made this distinction and separation is an important issue in
applying results from available studies in a Secondary NAAQS (or benefits estimation for
any policy effecting VAQ) context. The remainder of this discussion is focused on those
aesthetic and wellbeing qualities associated with a given VAQ in urban areas.
The term "urban visibility" is used to refer to VAQ throughout a city or metropolitan
area. Urban visibility includes the VAQ conditions in all locations that people experience in
their daily lives, including scenes such as residential streets and neighborhood parks,
commercial and industrial areas, highway and commuting corridors, central downtown
areas, and views from elevated locations providing a broad overlook of the metropolitan
area. Thus urban visibility includes VAQ conditions in major cities and smaller towns and
encompasses all the VAQ an individual resident sees on a regular basis. Visibility
conditions in urban and suburban locations are therefore distinct from visibility in rural or
wilderness settings such as the Class 1 areas defined by the Clean Air Act, which include
NPs and similar natural settings.
Visibility has direct significance to people's enjoyment of daily activities and their
overall wellbeing. Visibility conditions can be described both as an aesthetic quality as well
as a scientifically measurable set of atmospheric conditions. Due to the subjective nature of
July 2009
9-91
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
aesthetics, people's preferences with respect to visibility are difficult to express or quantify,
but people have expressed in many different ways that they enjoy and value a clear view. A
number of social science disciplines have undertaken to link perceived urban visibility to an
array of effects reflecting the overall desire for good VAQ, and the benefits of improving
currently degraded VAQ. This wide range of diverse studies have identified types of benefits
of good VAQ in addition to those directly connected with air-pollution related health effects
such as respiratory diseases and premature mortality.
For example, psychological research has demonstrated that people are emotionally
affected by low VAQ such that their overall sense of wellbeing is diminished (e.g.,
Bickerstaff and Walker, 2001, 156271). Researchers have also shown that perception of
pollution is correlated with stress, annoyance, and symptoms of depression (Evans and
Jacobs, 1982, 179899; Jacobs et al., 1984, 156596; Mace et al., 2004, 180255). Sociological
research has demonstrated that VAQ is deeply intertwined with a "sense of place," effecting
people's sense of the desirability of a neighborhood quite apart from the actual physical
conditions of the area (e.g., ABT, 2002, 156186; Day, 2007, 156386; Elliot et al., 1999,
010716; Gilliland et al., 2004, 156471). Public policy research finds that people think it is
important to protect visibility, and accept the concept of setting standards to protect
visibility (e.g., ABT, 2001, 156185; BBC Research & Consulting, 2002, 156258; Ely et al.,
1991, 156417; Pryor, 1996, 056598). Finally, economic valuation research has measured the
amount of money that people are willing to pay to protect or improve both urban visibility
(e.g., summary review in Beron et al., 2001, 156270; Chestnut and Dennis, 1997, 014525)
and natural locations such as NPs and other locations defined by the Clean Air Act as Class
I visibility area (e.g., summary review in Chestnut and Dennis, 1997, 014525).
Urban visibility has been examined in two types of studies directly relevant to the
NAAQS review process: urban visibility preference studies and urban visibility valuation
studies. The purpose of the remainder of this section is to review four urban preference
studies, as well as one new urban visibility valuation study not previously discussed in
previous EPA Criteria Documents or OAQPS Staff Papers.
Both types of studies are designed to evaluate individuals' desire (or demand) for good
VAQ where they live, using different metrics to evaluate demand. Urban visibility
preference studies examine individuals' demand by investigating what amount of visibility
degradation is unacceptable while economic studies examine demand by investigating how
much one would be willing to pay to improve visibility.
July 2009
9-92
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
9.2.4.1. Urban Visibility Preference Studies
One group of urban visibility research projects focused on identifying preferences for
urban VAQ without necessarily estimating the economic value of improving visibility. This
group of preference studies used a common focus group method to estimate the visibility
impairment conditions that respondents described as "acceptable." The specific definition of
acceptable was largely left to each individual respondent, allowing each to identify their
own preferences.
There are three completed studies that used this method, and one additional pilot
study (designed as a survey instrument development project) that provided additional
information (Table 9-2). The completed studies were conducted in Denver, Colorado (Ely et
al., 1991, 156417), two cities in British Columbia, Canada (Pryor, 1996, 056598), and
Phoenix, Arizona (BBC Research & Consulting, 2002, 156258). The pilot study was
conducted in Washington, DC (ABT, 2001, 156185).
Each study collected information in a focus group setting, presenting slides depicting
various visibility conditions. All four studies used photographs of a single scene from the
study's city! each photo included images of the broad downtown area and spreading out to
the hills or mountains composing the scene's backdrop. The maximum sight distance under
good conditions varied by city, ranging from 8 kilometers in Washington, DC to mountains
hundreds of kilometers away in Denver. Multiple photos of the same scene were used to
present approximately 20 different visibility impairment conditions. The Denver and
British Columbia studies used actual photographs taken in the same location to depict
various visibility conditions. The Phoenix and Washington, DC pilot study used
photographs prepared using the WinHaze software from Air Resource Specialists (ARS).
WinHaze is a computer-imaging software program that simulates visual air quality
differences of various scenes, allowing the user to "degrade" an original near-pristine
visibility condition photograph to create a photograph of each desired VAQ condition.
A common characteristic of the three visibility preference studies was that each were
conducted in the West where distant mountains were shown in the photograph used to elicit
local participant responses about visibility. Among other issues, the Washington D.C. pilot
study was the first step in a process to expand the results to other regions where typical
scenes may have different sensitivity to perceived visibility changes in PM air quality and
where participants may have different acceptable visibility preference values.
July 2009
9-93
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
One notable finding of the three visibility preference studies and the one pilot study is
the general degree of consistency in the median preferences for an acceptable amount of
visibility degradation. The range of median acceptable preference values from the four
studies is 19-25 dv, the preferred measure of visibility impairment. Measured in terms of
visual range (VR), these median acceptable values are between 59 and 32 km.
Table 9-2.
Summary of urban visibility preference studies.
Denver, CO
Phoenix, AZ
2 British Columbia cities
Washington, DC (pilot)
Report Date
1991
2003
1996
2001
Duration of session
45 min
50 mins
2 h
Compensation
None (civic groups)
$50
None (class room exercise)
$50
# focus group sessions
17
27 total at 6 locations,
Including 3 in Spanish
4
1
# participants
214
385
180
9
Age range
adults
18-65 +
University students
27-58
Annual or seasonal
Wintertime
Annual
Summertime
Annual
# total scenes
presented
Single scene of downtown
with mountains in
background
Single scene of downtown and
mountains, 42 km maximum
distance
Single scene from each city
Single scene of DC Mall and
downtown, 8 km maximum sight
# of total visibility
conditions presented
20 conditions (+ 5
duplicates)
21 conditions (+ 4 duplicates)
20 conditions (10 each from each city)
20 conditions (+ 5 duplicates)
Source of slides
Actual photos taken between
9am and 3pm
WinHaze
Actual photos taken at 1 pm or 4pm
WinHaze
Medium of presentatior
i Slide projection
Slide projection
Slide projection
Slide projection
Ranking scale used
7 point scale
7 point scale
7 point scale
7 point scale
Visibility range
presented
11 to 40 dv
15 to 35 dv
13 to 25 dv (Chilliwack) 13.5 to 31.5 dv
(Abbotsford)
9 to 38 dv
Health issue directions
Ignore potential health
impacts; visibility only
Judge solely on visibility, do not
consider health
Judge solely on visibility, do not consider
health
Health never mentioned, "Focus
only on visibility"
Key Questions asked
a) Rank VAQ (1-7 scale)
a) Rank VAQ (1-7 scale)
a) Rank VAQ (1-7 scale)
a) Rank VAQ (1-7 scale)
b) Is each slide "acceptable"
b) Is each slide "acceptable"
b) Is each slide "acceptable"
b) Is each slide "acceptable"
c)"How much haze is too
much?"
c) How many days a yr would
this picture be "acceptable"
c) if this hazy, how many hs
would it be acceptable (3 slides
only)
d) valuation question
Mean dvfound
"acceptable"
20.3 dv
23 to 25 dv
— 23 dv(Chilliwack),
— 20 dv (range 20-25)
~ 19 dv(Abbotsford)
July 2009
9-94
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
9.2.4.2. Denver, Colorado Urban Visibility Preference Study
The Denver urban visibility preference study (Ely et al., 1991, 156417) was conducted
on behalf of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE). The
study conducted a series of focus group sessions with 17 civic and community groups in
which a total of 214 individuals were asked to rate slides. The slides depicted varying
values of VAQ for a well-known Denver vista, including a broad view of downtown Denver
with the mountains to the west composing the scene's background. The participants were
instructed to base their judgments on three factors^
1. The standard was for an urban area, not a pristine national park area where the standards might be
more strict;
2. The value of an urban visibility standard violation should be set at a VAQ value considered to be
unreasonable, objectionable, and unacceptable visually; and
3. Judgments of standards violations should be based on visibility only, not on health effects.
Participants were shown 25 randomly ordered slides of actual photographs. The
visibility conditions presented in the slides ranged from 11 to 40 dv, approximating the 10th
to 90th percentile of wintertime visibility conditions in Denver. The participants rated the
25 slides based on a scale of 1 (poor) to 7 (excellent), with 5 duplicates included. They were
then asked to judge whether the slide would violate what they would consider to be an
appropriate urban visibility standard (i.e., whether the amount of impairment was
"acceptable" or "unacceptable"). The individual's judgment of a slide's VAQ and whether the
slide violated a visibility standard were highly correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient
>80%), as were the VAQ ratings and the yes/no "acceptable" response. The participant's
median response was that a visibility condition of 20.3 dv (extinction coefficient
bext = 76Mm1, or VR ~51 km) was judged as "acceptable." The CDPHE subsequently
established a Denver visibility standard at this value (defined as bext = 76Mm"1), based on
the median 50% acceptability findings from the study.
9.2.4.3. Phoenix, Arizona Urban Visibility Preference Study
The Phoenix urban visibility preference study (BBC Research & Consulting, 2002,
156258) was conducted on behalf of the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality. The
Phoenix study patterned its focus group survey process after the Denver study. The study
July 2009
9-95
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
included 385 participants in 27 separate focus group sessions. Participants were recruited
using random digit dialing to obtain a sample group designed to be demographically
representative of the larger Phoenix population. Focus group sessions were held at six
neighborhood locations throughout the metropolitan area to improve the participation rate.
Three sessions were held in Spanish in one region of the city with a large Hispanic
population (25%), although the final overall participation of native Spanish speakers (18%)
in the study was modestly below the targeted value. Participants received $50 as an
inducement to participate.
Participants were shown a series of 25 images of the same vista of downtown Phoenix,
with South Mountain in the background at a distance of about 40 km. Photographic slides
of the images were developed using WinHaze. The visibility impairment conditions ranged
from 15-35 dv (the extinction coefficient, bext, range was approximately 45 Mm"1 to 330 Mm"
1, or a visual range of 87-12 km). Participants first individually rated the randomly shown
slides on a VAQ scale of 1 (unacceptable) to 7 (excellent). Participants were instructed to
rate the photographs solely on visibility, and to not base their decisions on either health
concerns or what it would cost to have better visibility. Next, the participants individually
rated the randomly ordered slides as "acceptable" or "unacceptable," defined as whether the
visibility in the slide is unreasonable or objectionable. Better visibility conditions (15 dv and
20 dv) were judged "acceptable" by 90% of all participants. At 24 dv nearly half of all
participants thought the VAQ was "unacceptable," with almost three-quarters judging 26 dv
as unacceptable.
The Phoenix urban visibility study formed the basis of the decision of the Phoenix
Visibility Index Oversight Committee for a visibility index for the Phoenix Metropolitan
Area (Arizona Department of Environmental, 2000, 019164). The Phoenix Visibility Index
establishes an indexed system with 5 categories of visibility conditions, ranging from
"Excellent" (14 dv or less) to "Very Poor" (29 dv or greater). The "Good" range is 15-20 dv.
The environmental goal of the Phoenix urban visibility program is to achieve continued
progress through 2018 by moving the number of days in lower quality categories into better
quality categories.
9.2.4.4. British Columbia, Canada Urban Visibility Preference Study
The British Columbia urban visibility preference study (Pryor, 1996, 056598) was
conducted on behalf of the Ministry of Environment. The study conducted focus group
July 2009
9-96
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
sessions that were also developed following the methods used in the Denver study.
Participants were students at the University of British Columbia, who participated in one
of four focus group sessions with between 7 and 95 participants. A total of 180 respondents
completed surveys (29 did not complete the survey).
Participants in the study were shown slides of two suburban locations in British
Columbia: Chilliwack and Abbotsford. Using the same general protocol as the Denver study
Pryor found that responses from this study found the acceptable level of visibility was 23 dv
in Chilliwack and 19 dv in Abbotsford. Pryor (1996, 056598) discusses some possible
reasons for the variation in standard visibility judgments between the two locations.
Factors discussed include the relative complexity of the scenes, potential bias of the sample
population (only University students participated), and the different amounts of
development at each location. Abbotsford (population 130,000) is an ethnically diverse
suburb adjacent to the Vancouver Metro area, while Chilliwack (population 70,000) is an
agricultural community 100 km east Vancouver in the Frazier Valley.
The British Columbia urban visibility preference study is being considered by the B.C.
Ministry of the Environment as a part of establishing urban and wilderness visibility goals
in British Columbia.
9.2.4.5. Washington, DC Urban Visibility Pilot Preference Study
The Washington, DC urban visibility pilot study (ABT, 2001, 156185) was conducted
on behalf of the EPA, and was designed to be a pilot focus group study, an initial
developmental trial run of a larger study. The intent of the pilot study was to study both
focus group method design and potential survey questions. Due to funding limitations, only
a single focus group session was held, consisting of one extended session with 9
participants. No further urban visibility focus group sessions were held in Washington, DC.
Due to the small number of participants, it is not possible to make statistical
inferences about the opinions of the general population. The study does, however, provide
additional useful information about urban visibility studies, potentially helping to both
better understand previous studies as well as design future studies.
The study also adopted the general Denver study method, modifying it as appropriate
to be applicable in an eastern urban setting which has substantially different visibility
conditions than any of the three western locations of the other preference studies.
Washington's (and the entire East) visibility is typically substantially worse than western
July 2009
9-97
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
cities, and has different characteristics. Washington's visibility impairment is primarily a
uniform whitish haze dominated by sulfates, relative humidity values are higher, the low
lying terrain provides substantially shorter maximum sight distances, and many residents
are not well informed that anthropogenic emissions impair visibility on hazy days.
The Washington focus group session included questions on valuation, as well as on
preferences. The focus group was asked to state its preferences measured in an increase in
the general cost of living for certain increments of improvement in visibility on a typical
summer day. A general cost of living approach is one payment vehicle approach that can be
used in willingness to pay studies, especially for environmental issues arising from multiple
diverse emission sources (e.g., transportation, electricity generation, industry, etc.) making
a specific price increase potentially misleading.
The first part of the focus group session was designed to be an hour long, and was
comparable to the focus group sessions in the Denver and Phoenix studies. A single scene
was used; a panoramic shot of the Potomac River, Washington mall and downtown
Washington, DC. In the first part of the session people were asked to rate the VAQ of 25
photographs (prepared using WinHaze, and projected on a large screen), judge the
acceptability of visibility condition in each slide, and answer the valuation questions. The
second half of the session, however, was a moderated discussion session about the format
and content of the first phase of the session. In this moderated discussion, participants
were asked about their understanding of each question asked in the first half of the session.
Particular issues in designing a focus group session were also explored. Important
participant comments included:
1. Participants had been asked how they reacted to the initial direction to base their answers only on
visibility, but health was never explicitly mentioned by the focus group moderator. Participants
strongly agreed with the decision to not mention that health effects are associated with visibility
impairment. They understood the directions as meaning they should ignore health issues, and said
their answers would have been different if they included health as well as visibility in their
judgments.
2. Differentiating between haze and weather conditions was difficult. Weather was not discussed in
the focus group session, and the photographs were WinHaze altered photos with identical weather
conditions. Participants mentioned they were still confused about the role of weather and
humidity in the different visibility conditions presented in the photos.
July 2009
9-98
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
3. Questions about how many hours an impairment level would be acceptable were confusing. Most
participants were normally indoors during most of the day, so questions about duration of outdoor
conditions were difficult to answer.
4. Participants strongly agreed that not mentioning the purpose of the study, or the sponsor, until the
very end (after all the questions were answered) was viewed as very important. Most felt this
information would have influenced their answers.
9.2.4.6. Urban Visibility Valuation Studies
The one recent urban visibility benefit assessment not included in earlier reviews is
"The Benefits of Visibility Improvement: New Evidence from the Los Angeles Metropolitan
Area" (Beron et al., 2001, 156270). Rather than a contingent valuation method (CVM)
technique used in the majority of other urban visibility valuation studies, Beron et al.
(2001, 156270) used a housing market hedonic technique. The housing hedonic methods
were used in previous urban visibility studies by Murdoch and Thayer (1988, 156788) and
Trijonis et al. (1985, 078468). A housing market hedonic study views a housing unit as
composed of a bundle of attributes, and uses housing sale price data from a large number of
units in a metropolitan area to estimate the value of each component. Hedonic pricing has
been used to estimate economic values for environmental effects that have a direct effect on
housing market values. It relies on the measurement of differentials in property values
under various environmental quality conditions including air pollution, visibility and other
environmental amenities such as access to nearby beaches and parks, as well as by physical
attributes of the house and attributes of the neighborhood.
Beron et al. (2001, 156270) obtained data on approximately 840,000 owner-occupied,
single family housing sales between 1980 and 1995 from the California South Coast Air
Basin (composed of Los Angeles and Orange Counties, and the portions of Riverside and
San Bernardino Counties in the greater metropolitan area). The real estate data included
information on the sale price of the house, 13 housing attributes (square footage, number of
bathrooms, etc.), 9 neighborhood attributes (percent poverty, school quality, FBI crime
index, etc.), and three air pollution variables: ozone, particulates (measured by total
suspended particulates, or TSP), and visibility. Visibility was measured as the annual
average of visual range, measured in miles, and was obtained from seven airports within
the study region. The visibility range was from 12.4 miles (Los Angeles International
July 2009
9-99
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Airport, 1991) to 31.9 miles (Palm Springs Airport, 1995). Ozone data (39 monitors) and
TSP data (40 monitors) were obtained from the South Coast Air Quality Management
District. Annual mean values for each year were calculated for ozone and TSP.
Beron et al. (2001, 156270) presented results for a hypothetical basin-wide 20%
visibility improvement, or an increase from 15.3 to 18.4 miles, which is equivalent to
approximately 27.6 dv to 25.8 dv. The initial results reflect the change in the purchase price
of a house associated with this difference in VAQ, which can be interpreted as a present
value of a stream of annual values over the lifetime of the house. The authors therefore
selected a time horizon (30 yr) and an interest rate (8%) to calculate an annual per
household benefit per dv ranging from $484 to $1,756. The Beron results are higher than
the CVM-based values summarized in Chestnut and Dennis (1997, 014525), which ranged
from $12 to $132 per dv. It should be noted that the $132 CVM values cited by Chestnut
and Dennis (1997, 014525) is from a study in the Los Angeles area (Brookshire, 1979,
156298). The Beron et al. (2001, 156270) results are also higher than the Trijonis et al.
(1990, 157058) hedonic study in the Los Angeles area, which had a range of $134 to $360
per dv per year. All values reported here are in terms of 1994 prices.
A critical question for all urban visibility valuation studies is the extent to which the
estimated values strictly reflect preferences for visibility, and do not include a component of
preferences for reducing health risk from air pollution. The ability to isolate the value of
visibility from within the collection of intertwined benefits from visual air quality, which is
inherently multi-attributed, is a challenge for all visibility valuation studies. Each study
attempts to isolate visibility from other effect categories, but different studies take different
approaches.
Beron et al. (2001, 156270) include two measures of air pollution directly related to
health effects in their housing market hedonic study, ozone and particulates (using TSP as
the metric for particulates), as well as visibility. They argue that the presence of the two
health-related pollution conditions results in an estimated hedonic demand function for
visibility that successfully separates the health component of demand for overall air quality
from the visibility component. An alternative interpretation is that the estimated visibility
function still includes a component of health risk because the housing market data does not
support completely isolating the demand for visibility (due to correlated variables, omitted
variables, measurement error, model specification error, etc.) from demand for health risk
reductions measured by the two health related air quality metrics.
July 2009
9-100
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
A key issue in interpreting the Beron et al. (2001, 156270) results is whether the
objective measures of air quality characteristics (e.g., visibility, PM concentrations, etc.)
capture people's perceptions of the different aspects of air quality in a given location. To the
extent the people simultaneously use what they see regarding VAQ as an indicator of the
overall air quality including potential health risks, then including all the measures in the
equation is not necessarily sufficient to isolate one effect from the other.
9.2.5. Summary of Effects on Visibility
Visibility impairment is caused by light scattering and absorption by suspended
particles and gases. NO2 is the only commonly occurring atmospheric pollutant gas that
absorbs visible spectrum radiation, though in most situations the amount of light
absorption by NO2 is overwhelmed by the higher amounts of particulate light extinction
(i.e., the combination of scattering and absorption) usually accompanying high NO2
concentrations. Light scattering by gases in a pollutant-free atmosphere provides a limit to
visibility in pristine conditions and is the largest contributor to the total light extinction
during the least visibility-impaired periods in remote regions of the western U.S. There is
strong and consistent evidence that PM is the overwhelming source of visibility impairment
in both urban and remote areas. Elemental carbon (EC) and some crustal minerals are the
only commonly occurring airborne particle components that absorb light. All particles
scatter light, and generally light scattering by particles is the largest of the four light
extinction components. Although a larger particle scatters more light than similarly shaped
smaller particle of the same composition, the light scattered per unit of mass is greatest for
particles with diameters from approximately 0.3-1.0 pm.
For studies where detailed data on particle composition by size data are available,
accurate calculations of light extinction can be made. However, routinely available PM
speciation data can be used to make reasonable estimates of light extinction using
relatively simple algorithms that multiply the concentrations of each of the major PM
species by its dry extinction efficiency and by a water growth term that accounts for particle
size change as a function of relative humidity for hygroscopic species (e.g., SO42-, nitrate,
and sea salt). This permits the visibility impairment associated with each of the major PM
components to be separately approximated from PM speciation monitoring data. There are
six major PM components^ PM2.5 SC>42~ usually assumed to be ammonium sulfate, PM2.5
July 2009
9-101
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
nitrate usually assumed to be ammonium nitrate, PM2.5 OC compound, PM2.5 EC, PM2.5
crustal material (referred to as fine soil), and PM10-2.5 or coarse mass.
Direct optical measurement of light extinction measured by transmissometer, or by
combining the PM light scattering measured by integrating nephelometers with the PM
light absorption measured by an aethalometer offer a number of advantages compared to
algorithm estimates of light extinction based on PM composition and relative humidity
data. The direct measurements are not subject to the uncertainties associated with
assumed scattering and absorption efficiencies used in the PM algorithm approach. The
direct measurements have higher time resolution (i.e., minutes to hours), which is more
commensurate with the visibility effects compared with calculated light extinction using
routinely available PM speciation data (i.e., 24-h duration).
Particulate SO r and nitrate are produced in the atmosphere from gaseous
precursors, making them secondary PM species. They both have comparable light
extinction efficiencies (haze impacts per unit mass concentration) at any relative humidity
value, their light scattering per unit mass concentration increases with increasing relative
humidity, and at sufficiently high humidity values (RH>85%) they are the most efficient
particulate species contributing to haze. Particulate S( )r is the dominant source of
regional haze in the eastern U.S. (>50% of the particulate light extinction) and an
important contributor to haze elsewhere in the country (>20% of particulate light
extinction).
Particulate nitrate is a minor component of remote-area regional haze in the
non-California western and eastern U.S., but an important contributor in much of
California and in the upper Midwestern U.S. especially during winter when it is the
dominant contributor to particulate light extinction. While both nitric acid (a reaction
product of NOx emissions) and ammonia are needed to form ammonium nitrate, the
apparent reason for the Midwest nitrate bulge (i.e., region of high winter PM nitrate) is an
abundance of atmospheric ammonia in this region principally from agricultural emissions.
There is evidence that transport from the Midwest nitrate bulge region is responsible for
some of the ammonium nitrate episodes experienced in downwind regions far to the east.
Urban particulate nitrate concentrations are significantly elevated above surrounding
remote-area background concentrations with the largest urban contributions in the western
U.S. Particulate ammonium nitrate concentrations in California and the Midwestern
nitrate bulge region are an order of magnitude greater than estimated natural ammonium
July 2009
9-102
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
nitrate concentrations. Thermodynamic and air quality simulation modeling show that
particulate nitrate concentrations are sensitive to changes in either NOx emissions (from a
combination of mobile and point sources) or ammonia emissions (principally from
agricultural sources), with the responsiveness of particulate nitrate to emissions changes
depending on the relative abundance of ammonia and nitric acid in the atmosphere.
EC and OC have the highest dry extinction efficiencies of the major PM species and
are responsible for a large fraction of the haze especially in the Northwestern U.S., though
absolute concentrations are as high in the eastern U.S. Both are a product of incomplete
combustion of fuels, including those used in internal combustion processes (gasoline and
diesel emissions) and open biomass burning (smoke from wild and prescribed fire). Organic
compound PM species are also produced by atmospheric transformation of precursor
gaseous emissions. Smoke plume impacts from large wildfires dominate many of the worst
haze periods in the western U.S. Carbonaceous PM is generally the largest component of
urban excess PM2.5 (i.e., the difference between urban and regional background
concentration). Western urban areas have more than twice the average concentrations of
carbonaceous PM than remote areas sites in the same region. In eastern urban areas PM2.5
is dominated by about equal concentrations of carbonaceous and SOr components, though
the usually high relative humidity in the East causes the hydrated SO r particles to be
responsible for about twice as much of the urban haze as that caused by the carbonaceous
PM.
Radiocarbon dating of carbonaceous PM from twelve sites (eight in the West, two of
which are urban) showed that about half of the urban area carbonaceous PM is from
contemporary as opposed to fossil sources, while in remote areas the fraction that is
contemporary ranges from 82%-100%. Summer urban excess carbonaceous PM is
dominated by fossil carbon for the two western urban areas (Phoenix, AZ and Seattle, WA),
but nearly half of the winter urban excess for these two urban areas are from contemporary
carbon sources (e.g., residential wood combustion). An empirical relationship between the
radiocarbon analysis results and the more widely measured elemental and OC data set was
used to estimate the fraction of contemporary carbon at about 150 monitoring locations
nationwide. The highest fraction of contemporary carbon is for the western remote areas
sites during the summer (>90% contemporary) and the least was for eastern urban areas
during the summer (<45% contemporary). Winter tended to have less extreme fractions of
contemporary carbon for both remote and urban areas. A lower bound estimate of 40% of
July 2009
9-103
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
the contemporary and 35% of the fossil carbon is from secondary conversion of gaseous
precursor during the summer at the twelve radiocarbon monitoring sites, suggesting that
primary carbonaceous PM whether from fossil or contemporary sources represent less than
two thirds of the total carbonaceous PM.
PM2.5 crustal material (referred to as fine soil) and coarse mass (i.e., PM10 minus
PM2.5) are significant contributors to haze for remote areas sites in the arid Southwestern
U.S. where they contribute a quarter to a third of the haze, with coarse mass usually
contributing twice that of fine soil. Coarse mass concentrations are as high in the Central
Great Plains as in the Southwestern deserts though there are no corresponding high
concentrations of fine soil as in the Southwest. Also, the relative contribution to haze by the
high coarse mass in the Great Plains is much smaller because of the generally higher haze
values caused by the high concentrations of S( )r and nitrate PM in that region.
A comprehensive assessment of the 610 worst haze sample periods over a 3-yr period
in the western U.S. where dust is the major contributor categorized each site/sampler
period into four causal groups: Asian dust, local windblown dust, transported regional
windblown dust, and undetermined dust (i.e., not in one of the three other groups). Most
dust days occurred at sites in Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, western Texas, and southern
California, and these were dominated by local and regionally transported wind-blown dust.
Asian dust caused only a few of the worst dust days during the 3-yr assessment period,
though it is an important source of dust for the more northerly regions of the West
(responsible for 10%-40% of their worst dust periods) were there is rarely any windblown
dust probably due to the greater ground cover. The frequency of worst dust events classified
as undetermined was greatest for sites in the vicinity of large urban and agricultural areas
such as those in California and Southern Arizona.
Visibility has direct significance to people's enjoyment of daily activities and their
overall sense of wellbeing. A number of social science disciplines have undertaken to link
perceived urban visibility to an array of effects reflecting the overall desire for good VAQ,
and the benefits of improving currently degraded VAQ. For example, psychological research
has demonstrated that people are emotionally affected by poor VAQ such that their overall
sense of wellbeing is diminished. Urban visibility has been examined in two types of studies
directly relevant to the NAAQS review process: urban visibility preference studies and
urban visibility valuation studies. Both types of studies are designed to evaluate
individuals' desire for good VAQ where they live, using different metrics. Urban visibility
July 2009
9-104
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
preference studies examine individuals' preferences by investigating the amount of
visibility degradation considered unacceptable, while economic studies examine the value
an individual places on improving VAQ by eliciting how much the individual would be
willing to pay for different amounts of VAQ improvement.
There are three urban visibility preference studies and one additional pilot study
(designed as a survey instrument development project) that have been conducted to date
that provide useful information on individuals' preferences for good VAQ in the urban
setting. The completed studies were conducted in Denver, Colorado (Ely et al., 1991,
156417), two cities in British Columbia, Canada (Pryor, 1996, 056598) and Phoenix, Arizona
(BBC Research & Consulting, 2002, 156258). The pilot study was conducted in Washington,
DC (ABT, 2002, 156186). One notable finding of the three visibility preference studies and
the one pilot study is the general degree of consistency in the median preferences for an
acceptable amount of visibility degradation. The range of median acceptable visibility
preference values from the four studies is 19-25 dv. Measured in terms of visual range (VR),
these median acceptable values are between 59 km and 32 km.
The economic importance of urban visibility has been examined by a number of
studies designed to quantify the benefits (or willingness to pay) associated with potential
improvements in urban visibility. Urban visibility valuation research prior to 1997 was
summarized in Chestnut and Dennis (1997, 014525), and was also described in the 2004
PM AQCD (EPA, 2004, 056905) and the 2005 OAQPS PM NAAQS Staff Paper (U.S. EPA,
2005, 090209). Since the mid-1990s, little new information has become available regarding
urban visibility valuation.
Collectively, the evidence is sufficient to conclude that a causal relationship exists
between PM and visibility impairment.
9.3. Effects on Climate
While most of this ISA is restricted to consideration of the emissions, transport and
transformation, resulting concentrations, and effects from PM in the U.S., because the
effects endpoint here is climate, a larger spatial domain is needed. However, this
assessment is not intended to be comprehensive even as a survey of the enormous range
and volume of science related to climate effects from PM; rather, particular attention has
been paid to data relevant to the U.S.
July 2009
9-105
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
The two principal sources for material in this section are Chapter 2, "Changes in
Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing," (Forster et al., 2007, 092936) in the
comprehensive Working Group I report in the Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) from the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Climate Change 2007: The Physical
Science Basis (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007, 092765), hereafter IPCC
AR4; and the U.S. Climate Change Science Program Synthesis and Assessment Product 2.3,
"Atmospheric Aerosol Properties and Climate Impacts," by Chin et al. (2009, 192130).
hereafter CCSP SAP2.3. The EPA is a constituent agency member of the U.S. federated
CCSP along with NOAA and NASA, which led production of CCSP SAP2.3 incorporating
significant sections from EPA data and reports related particularly to U.S. emissions and
measurements. Sections from each of these recent comprehensive reports are included here
in their entirety or as emended as noted where they represent the most thorough summary
of the climate effects of aerosols. (In the sections included from IPCC AR4 and CCSP
SAP2.3, 'aerosols' is more frequently used than "PM" and that word is retained.)
9.3.1. The Climate Effects of Aerosols
Section 9.3.1 comes directly from CCSP SAP2.3 Chapter 1 Section 1.2, with section, table,
and figure numbers changed to be internally consistent with this ISA.
Aerosols exert a variety of impacts on the environment. Aerosols (sometimes
referred to particulate matter or "PM," especially in air quality applications), when
concentrated near the surface, have long been recognized as affecting pulmonary
function and other aspects of human health. Sulfate and nitrate aerosols play a role in
acidifying the surface downwind of gaseous sulfur and odd nitrogen sources. Particles
deposited far downwind might fertilize iron-poor waters in remote oceans, and
Saharan dust reaching the Amazon Basin is thought to contribute nutrients to the
rainforest soil.
Aerosols also interact strongly with solar and terrestrial radiation in several
ways. Figure 9"52 offers a schematic overview. First, they scatter and absorb sunlight
(McCormick and Ludwig, 1967, 190528; Mitchell, 1971, 190546! Charlson and Pilat,
1969, 190025); these are described as "direct effects" on shortwave (solar) radiation.
Second, aerosols act as sites at which water vapor can accumulate during cloud
droplet formation, serving as cloud condensation nuclei or CCN. Any change in
number concentration or hygroscopic properties of such particles has the potential to
modify the physical and radiative properties of clouds, altering cloud brightness
(Twomey, 1977, 190 5 33) and the likelihood and intensity with which a cloud will
precipitate (Liou and Ou, 1989, 190407; Albrecht, 1989, 045783; e.g., Gunn and
Phillips, 1957, 190595). Collectively changes in cloud processes due to anthropogenic
aerosols are referred to as aerosol indirect effects. Finally, absorption of solar
radiation by particles is thought to contribute to a reduction in cloudiness, a
phenomenon referred to as the semi-direct effect. This occurs because absorbing
aerosol warms the atmosphere, which changes the atmospheric stability, and reduces
surface flux.
July 2009
9-106
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
The primary direct effect of aerosols is a brightening of the planet when viewed
from space, as much of Earth's surface is dark ocean, and most aerosols scatter more
than 90% of the visible light reaching them. The primary indirect effects of aerosols on
clouds include an increase in cloud brightness, change in precipitation and possibly an
increase in lifetime; thus the overall net impact of aerosols is an enhancement of
Earth's reflectance (shortwave albedo). This reduces the sunlight reaching Earth's
surface, producing a net climatic cooling, as well as a redistribution of the radiant and
latent heat energy deposited in the atmosphere. These effects can alter atmospheric
circulation and the water cycle, including precipitation patterns, on a variety of length
and time scales (e.g., Ramanathan et al., 2001, 042681; Zhang et al., 2006, 190933).
Scattering & Unperturbed Increased CDNC
Drizzle
Increased cloud height Increased cloud
absorption of
radiation
^ Direct effects J
cloud
(constant LWC)
(Twomey, 1974)
Cloud albedo effect/
1st indirect effect/ J
I Twomey effect I
suppression. (Pincus & Baker, 1994) lifetime
Increased LWC (Albrecht, 1989)
Vca
Cloud lifetime effect/ 2nd indirect effect/ Albrecht effect
Heating causes
cloud burn-off
(Ackerman et al., 2000)
Semi-direct effect
Surface
Source: IPCC (2007,190988) modified from Haywood and Boucher (2000,156531).
Figure 9-52. Aerosol radiative forcing. Airborne particles can affect the heat balance of the
atmosphere, directly, by scattering and absorbing sunlight, and indirectly, by altering
cloud brightness and possibly lifetime. Here small black dots represent aerosols, circles
represent cloud droplets, and straight lines represent short-wave radiation, and wavy
lines, long-wave radiation. LWC is liquid water content, and CDNC is cloud droplet
number concentration. Confidence in the magnitudes of these effects varies
considerably (see Chapter 3). Although the overall effect of aerosols is a net cooling at
the surface, the heterogeneity of particle spatial distribution, emission history, and
properties, as well as differences in surface reflectance, mean that the magnitude and
even the sign of aerosol effects vary immensely with location, season and sometimes
inter-annually. The human-induced component of these effects is sometimes called
"climate forcing."
Several variables are used to quantify the impact aerosols have on Earth's energy
balance; these are helpful in describing current understanding, and in assessing
possible future steps.
For the purposes of this report, aerosol radiative forcing (RF) is defined as the net
energy flux (downwelling minus upwelling) difference between an initial and a
perturbed aerosol loading state, at a specified level in the atmosphere. (Other
quantities, such as solar radiation, are assumed to be the same for both states.) This
difference is defined such that a negative aerosol forcing implies that the change in
Top of the
atmosphere
Indirect effect
on ice clouds
and contrails
July 2009
9-107
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
aerosols relative to the initial state exerts a cooling influence, whereas a positive
forcing would mean the change in aerosols exerts a warming influence.
There are a number of subtleties associated with this definition-
(1) The initial state against which aerosol forcing is assessed must be specified.
For direct aerosol radiative forcing, it is sometimes taken as the complete absence of
aerosols. IPCC AR4 (2001, 156587) uses as the initial state their estimate of aerosol
loading in 1750. That year is taken as the approximate beginning of the era when
humans exerted accelerated influence on the environment.
(2) A distinction must be made between aerosol RF and the anthropogenic
contribution to aerosol RF. Much effort has been made to distinguishing these
contributions by modeling and with the help of space-based, airborne, and surface-
based remote sensing, as well as in situ measurements. These efforts are described in
subsequent chapters (of the CCSP SAP2.3).
(3) In general, aerosol RF and anthropogenic aerosol RF include energy associated
with both the shortwave (solar) and the long-wave (primarily planetary thermal
infrared) components of Earth's radiation budget. However, the solar component
typically dominates, so in this document, these terms are used to refer to the solar
component only, unless specified otherwise. The wavelength separation between the
short" and long-wave components is usually set at around three or four micrometers.
(4) The IPCC AR4 (2007, 190988) defines radiative forcing as the net downward
minus upward irradiance at the tropopause due to an external driver of climate
change. This definition excludes stratospheric contributions to the overall forcing.
Under typical conditions, most aerosols are located within the troposphere, so aerosol
forcing at TOA and at the tropopause are expected to be very similar. Major volcanic
eruptions or conflagrations can alter this picture regionally, and even globally.
(5) Aerosol radiative forcing can be evaluated at the surface, within the
atmosphere, or at top-of-atmosphere (TOA). In this document, unless specified
otherwise, aerosol radiative forcing is assessed at TOA.
(6) As discussed subsequently, aerosol radiative forcing can be greater at the
surface than at TOA if the aerosols absorb solar radiation. TOA forcing affects the
radiation budget of the planet. Differences between TOA forcing and surface forcing
represent heating within the atmosphere that can affect vertical stability, circulation
on many scales, cloud formation, and precipitation, all of which are climate effects of
aerosols. In this document, unless specified otherwise, these additional climate effects
are not included in aerosol radiative forcing.)
(7) Aerosol direct radiative forcing can be evaluated under cloud-free conditions or
under natural conditions, sometimes termed "all-sky" conditions, which include
clouds. Cloud-free direct aerosol forcing is more easily and more accurately calculated;
it is generally greater than all-sky forcing because clouds can mask the aerosol
contribution to the scattered light. Indirect forcing, of course, must be evaluated for
cloudy or all-sky conditions. In this document, unless specified otherwise, aerosol
radiative forcing is assessed for all-sky conditions.
(8) Aerosol radiative forcing can be evaluated instantaneously, daily (24 h)
averaged, or assessed over some other time period. Many measurements, such as
those from polar-orbiting satellites, provide instantaneous values, whereas models
usually consider aerosol RF as a daily average quantity. In this document, unless
specified otherwise, daily averaged aerosol radiative forcing is reported.
(9) Another subtlety is the distinction between a "forcing" and a "feedback." As
different parts of the climate system interact, it is often unclear which elements are
"causes" of climate change (forcings among them), which are responses to these
causes, and which might be some of each. So, for example, the concept of aerosol
effects on clouds is complicated by the impact clouds have on aerosols; the aggregate is
often called aerosol-cloud interactions. This distinction sometimes matters, as it is
July 2009
9-108
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
more natural to attribute responsibility for causes than for responses. However,
practical environmental considerations usually depend on the net result of all
influences. In this report, "feedbacks" are taken as the consequences of changes in
surface or atmospheric temperature, with the understanding that for some
applications, the accounting may be done differently
RFTerrm
1
l'; - • ¦- ¦ ¦ j
Lemuel vied
p eisihoiHe 1
fijO "
i luic^i Lei i>
s
DO
~
CL
£
-T-
Diane StTiUMplwK
I nepOipTW riC
watw
vapour f-uiri CH,
S:..-fari- : ;h-r>do
R-nc L r.:r |if|ii
C3« SlKf#
IDirctii cifn.
A0-j|
Glctml
(VLa-fc-rtl
CfflWronjJ
-------
cd
-O
o
>
cu
&
warning
Irrrg Wrr. jTrsrrnnqitf
.^aes and azanft
lliLk.TPC Ul|B^
aeiltoiiiw.i
kfi»J nirrcsoi
~ - r.^-w H3*T«riL
I i Jr. .il Tj/G
|otA antfrcMMfpjfc rgefiHsrvB farong 1
t, g A u 1 * W fN
A 0
Radiative Forcing {W nr3)
Source: Adapted from IPCC (2007,190988).
Figure 9-54. Probability distribution functions (PDFs) for anthropogenic aerosol and GHG RFs.
Dashed red curve: RF of long-lived greenhouse gases plus ozone; dashed blue curve: RF
of aerosols (direct and cloud albedo RF); red filled curve: combined anthropogenic RF.
The RF range is at the 90% confidence interval.
In summary, aerosol radiative forcing, the fundamental quantity about which this
report is written, must be qualified by specifying the initial and perturbed, aerosol
states: for which the radiative flux difference is calculated, the altitude at which the
quantity is assessed, the wavelength regime considered, the temporal averaging, the
cloud conditions, and whether total or only human-induced contributions are-
considered- The definition given here, qualified as needed, is used throughout the
report.
Although the possibility that aerosols affect climate was recognized more than 40
yr ago, the measurements needed to establish the magnitude of such effects, or even
whether specific aerosol types warm or cool the surface , were lacking. Satellite
instruments capable of at least crudely monitoring aerosol amount globally were first
deployed in the late 1970s. But Scientific focus on this Subject grew substantially in
the 1990s (e.g.j.Charlson and Wigley, 1994, 192011. 1991, 045793. 1992, 045794:
Penner et al., 1992, 045825). in part because it was recognized that reproducing the
observed temperature trends over the industrial period with climate models requires
including net global cooling by aerosols in the calculation (IP<3C, 1995, 190991: 1996,
190990). along with the warming influence of enhanced atmospheric greenhouse gas
(i ill1 i) concentrations - mainly carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide,
chlorofluoroearbons, and ozone.
Improved satellite instruments, ground- and ship-based surface monitoring, more
sophisticated chemical transport and climate models, and field campaigns that
brought all these elements together with aircraft remote sensing and in situ sampling
for focused, coordinated study, began to fill in some of the knowledge gaps. By the
Fourth IP<3C Assessment Report, the scientific community consensus held that in
global average, the sum of direct and indirect top-of-atmosphere (T0A) forcing by
anthropogenic aerosols is negative (cooling) of about "1.3 W/m2 ("2.2 to -0.5 W/m2).
This is significant compared to the positive forcing by anthropogenic GHSs (including
ozone), about 2.9 ± 0.3 W/m2 (IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate, 2007,
190988). However, the spatial distribution of the gases and aerosols are very different,
and they do not simply exert compensating influences on climate.
July 2009
9-110
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
r
E
I
LLi
The ,IPCC aerosol forcing assessments are based largely on model calculations,
constrained as much as possible by observations. At present., aerosol influences are
not yet quantified adequately, according to Figure SHU, as scientific understanding is
designated as "Medium-Low" and "Low" for the direct and indirect climate forcing,
respectively. The 11 If V AIM (2007, 190988) concluded that uncertainties associated
with changes in Earth's radiation budget .due to anthropogenic aerosols make the
largest contribution to the overall uncertainty in radiative forcing of climate change
among the factors assessed over the industrial period (Figure U-~< I).
120
• 1ftQ
40
-60
-AO
*0
0
t
1
TOA
Surfac*
1
I
i
I
South
Antvri&n Africa
tftomass burning
&OUIH A.< 0,1 A ¦*- 0 .2 A -0,1. Nurlli Europe
0.35 America
M
x
Asi.i
Mineral a li 5t
PalLunon
Source: Adapted from Zhou et al. (2005,156183).
Figure 9-55. The clear-sky forcing efficiency En, defined as the diurnally averaged aerosol direct
radiative effect (W/m2) per unit A0D at 550 nm, calculated at both TOA and the surface,
for typical aerosol types over different geographical regions. The vertical black lines
represent ± one standard deviation of Ed for individual aerosol regimes and A is surface
broadband albedo.
Although AOD, aerosol properties, aerosol vertical distribution, and surface,
reflectivity all contribute to aerosol radiative forcing, AOD usually varies on regional
scales more than the other aerosol quantities involved. Forcing efficiency (Et) defined
as a ratio of direct aerosol radiative forcing to ADD at 550 nm, reports the sensitivity
of aerosol radiative forcing to AOD, and is useful for isolating the influences of particle
properties and other factors from that of AOD. /•-' is expected to exhibit a range of
values globally, because it is governed mainly by aerosol size distribution and
chemical composition (which determine aerosol single-scattering albedo and phase
function), surface reflectivity, and solar irradiance, each of which exhibits pronounced
spatial and temporal variations. To assess aerosol RF JKJgs multiplied by the ambient
AOD,
Figure 9-55 shows a range of A;. derived from AERONET surface sun photometer
network measurements of aerosol loading and particle properties;, representing
July 2009
9-111
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
different aerosol and surface types, and geographic locations. It demonstrates how
aerosol direct solar radiative forcing (with initial state taken as the absence of aerosol)
is determined by a combination of aerosol and surface properties. For example, _£rdue
to southern African biomass burning smoke is greater at the surface and smaller at
TOA than South American smoke because the southern African smoke absorbs
sunlight more strongly, and the magnitude of Eiior mineral dust for several locations
varies depending on the underlying surface reflectance. Figure 9"55 illustrates one
further point, that the radiative forcing by aerosols on surface energy balance can be
much greater than that at TOA. This is especially true when the particles have SSA
substantially less than 1, which can create differences between surface and TOA
forcing as large as a factor of five (e.g., Zhou, 2005, 156183).
Table 9-3. Top-of-atmosphere, cloud-free, instantaneous direct aerosol radiative forcing dependence
on aerosol and surface properties. Here TWP, SGP, and NSA are the Tropical West Pacific
island. Southern Great Plains, and North Slope Alaska observation stations maintained by
the DOE ARM program, respectively. Instantaneous values are given at specific solar
zenith angle. Upper and middle parts are from McComiskey et al. (2008,190523).
Representative, parameter-specific measurement uncertainty upper bounds for producing
1 W/m2 instantaneous TOA forcing accuracy are given in the lower part, based on
sensitivities at three sites from the middle part of the table.
Parameters
TWP
SGP
NSA
AEROSOL PROPERTIES (AOD, SSA, GJ, SOLAR ZENITH ANGLE (SZA), SURFACE ALBEDO (A), AND AEROSOL DIRECT RF A T TOA (F)
AOD
0.05
0.1
0.05
SSA
0.97
0.95
0.95
g
0.8
0.6
0.7
A
0.05
0.1
0.9
SZA
30
45
70
F (W/m2)
¦2.2
¦6.3
2.6
SENSITIVITY OF CLOUD FREE, INSTANTANEOUS, TOA DIRECT AEROSOL RADIATIVE FORCING TO AEROSOL AND SURFACE PROPERTIES, W/M2 PER UNIT
CHANGE IN PROPERTY
rfFMAOD)
¦45
¦64
51
rfFMSSA)
¦11
¦50
¦60
rfF/rfg
13
23
2
rfFM
8
24
6
REPRESENTATIVE MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY UPPER BOUNDS FOR PRODUCING 1 W/M2 ACCURACY OF AEROSOL RF
AOD
0.022
0.016
0.020
SSA
0.091
0.020
0.017
g
0.077
0.043
A
0.125
0.042
0.167
Table 9"3 presents estimates of cloud-free, instantaneous, aerosol direct RF
dependence on AOD, and on aerosol and surface properties, calculated for three sites
maintained by the U.S. Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement
(ARM) program, where surface and atmospheric conditions span a significant range of
July 2009
9-112
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
natural environments (McComiskey et al., 2008, 190523). Here aerosol RF is
evaluated relative to an initial state that is the complete absence of aerosols. Note
that aerosol direct RF dependence on individual parameters varies considerably,
depending on the values of the other parameters, and in particular, that aerosol RF
dependence on AOD actually changes sign, from net cooling to net warming, when
aerosols reside over an exceedingly bright surface. Sensitivity values are given for
snapshots at fixed solar zenith angles, relevant to measurements made, for example,
by polar-orbiting satellites.
The lower portion of Table 9"3 presents upper bounds on instantaneous
measurement uncertainty, assessed individually for each of AOD, SSA, g, and A, to
produce a 1 W/m2 top-of atmosphere, cloud-free aerosol RF accuracy. The values are
derived from the upper portion of the table, and reflect the diversity of conditions
captured by the three ARM sties. Aerosol RF sensitivity of 1 W/m2 is used as an
example! uncertainty upper bounds are obtained from the partial derivative for each
parameter by neglecting the uncertainties for all other parameters. These estimates
produce an instantaneous AOD measurement uncertainty upper bound between about
0.01 and 0.02, and SSA constrained to about 0.02 over surfaces as bright as or
brighter than the ARM Southern Great Plains site, typical of mid-latitude, vegetated
land. Other researchers, using independent data sets, have derived ranges of _£rand
aerosol RF sensitivity similar to those presented here, for a variety of conditions
(Zhou, 2005, 156183! Yu, 2006, 156173; Christopher and Jones, 2008, 189985).
These uncertainty bounds provide a baseline against which current and expected
near-future instantaneous measurement capabilities are assessed in Chapter 2 (of the
CCSP SAP2.3). Model sensitivity is usually evaluated for larger-scale (even global)
and longer-term averages. When instantaneous measured values from a randomly
sampled population are averaged, the uncertainty component associated with random
error diminishes as something like the inverse square root of the number of samples.
As a result, the accuracy limits used for assessing more broadly averaged model
results corresponding to those used for assessing instantaneous measurements would
have to be tighter, as discussed in Chapter 4 (of the CCSP SAP2.3).
In summary, much of the challenge in quantifying aerosol influences arises from
large spatial and temporal heterogeneity, caused by the wide variety of aerosol
sources, sizes and compositions, the spatial non-uniformity and intermittency of these
sources, the short atmospheric lifetime of most aerosols, and the spatially and
temporally non-uniform chemical and microphysical processing that occurs in the
atmosphere. In regions having high concentrations of anthropogenic aerosol, for
example, aerosol forcing is much stronger than the global average, and can exceed the
magnitude of GHG warming, locally reversing the sign of the net forcing. It is also
important to recognize that the global-scale aerosol TOA forcing alone is not an
adequate metric for climate change (National Research, 2005, 057409). Due to aerosol
absorption, mainly by soot, smoke, and some desert dust particles, the aerosol direct
radiative forcing at the surface can be much greater than the TOA forcing, and in
addition, the radiative heating of the atmosphere by absorbing particles can change
the atmospheric temperature structure, evolution, and possibly large-scale dynamical
systems such as the monsoons (Kim et al., 2006, 190917; Lau et al., 2008, 190229). By
realizing aerosol's climate significance and the challenge of charactering highly
variable aerosol amount and properties, the U.S. Climate Change Research Initiative
(CCRI) identified research on atmospheric concentrations and effects of aerosols
specifically as a top priority (National Research, 2001, 053303).
July 2009
9-113
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
9.3.2. Overview of Aerosol Measurement Capabilities
9.3.2.1. Satellite Remote Sensing
Section 9.3.2 with the exception of the final paragraph, comes directly from CCSP
SAP2.3 Chapter 2, Section 2.2 with section, table, and figure numbers changed to be
internally consistent with this ISA.
A measurement-based characterization of aerosols on a global scale can be
realized only through satellite remote sensing, which is the only means of
characterizing the large spatial and temporal heterogeneities of aerosol distributions.
Monitoring aerosols from space has been performed for over two decades and is
planned for the coming decade with enhanced capabilities (King et al., 1999, 190635;
Forster et al., 2007, 092936; Lee et al., 2006, 190358; Mischenko et al., 2007, 190543).
Table 9"4 summarizes major satellite measurements currently available for the
tropospheric aerosol characterization and radiative forcing research.
Early aerosol monitoring from space relied on sensors that were designed for
other purposes. The Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR), intended
as a cloud and surface monitoring instrument, provides radiance observations in the
visible and near infrared wavelengths that are sensitive to aerosol properties over the
ocean (Husar et al., 1997, 045900; Mishchenko et al., 1999, 190541). Originally
intended for ozone monitoring, the ultraviolet (UV) channels used for the Total Ozone
Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) are sensitive to aerosol UV absorption with little
surface interferences, even over land (Torres et al., 1998, 190503). This UV-technique
makes TOMS suitable for monitoring biomass burning smoke and dust, though with
limited sensitivity near the surface (Herman et al., 1997, 048393) and for retrieving
aerosol single-scattering albedo from space (Torres et al., 2005, 190507). (Anew
sensor, the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) aboard Aura, has improved on such
UVtechnique advantages, providing higher spatial resolution and more spectral
channels; see (Veihelmann et al., 2007, 190627). Such historical sensors have provided
multi-decadal climatology of aerosol optical depth that has significantly advanced the
understanding of aerosol distributions and long-term variability (e.g.,Geogdzhayev et
al., 2002, 190574; Massie et al., 2004, 190492; Mishchenko and Geogdzhayev, 2007,
190545; Mishchenko et al., 2007, 190542; Torres et al., 2002, 190505; Zhao et al., 2008,
190935).
Over the past decade, satellite aerosol retrievals have become increasingly
sophisticated. Now, satellites measure the angular dependence of radiance and
polarization at multiple wavelengths from UV through the infrared (IR) at fine spatial
resolution. From these observations, retrieved aerosol products include not only
optical depth at one wavelength, but also spectral optical depth and some information
about particle size over both ocean and land, as well as more direct measurements of
polarization and phase function. In addition, cloud screening is much more robust
than before and onboard calibration is now widely available. Examples of such new
and enhanced sensors include the MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer
(MODIS, see Box 2.1 of CCSP SAP2.3), the Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer
(MISR, see Box 2.2 of CCSP SAP2.3), Polarization and Directionality of the Earth's
Reflectance (POLDER, see Box 2.3 of CCSP SAP2.3), and OMI, among others. The
accuracy for AOD measurement from these sensors is about 0.05 or 20% of AOD
(Kahn RA Gaitley et al., 2005, 190966; Remer et al., 2005, 190221) and somewhat
better over dark water, but that for aerosol microphysical properties, which is useful
for distinguishing aerosol air mass types, is generally low. The Clouds and the Earth's
Radiant Energy System (CERES, see Box 2.4 of CCSP SAP2.3) measures broadband
solar and terrestrial radiances. The CERES radiation measurements in combination
July 2009
9-114
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
with satellite retrievals of aerosol optical depth can be used to determine aerosol
direct radiative forcing.
Table 9-4. Summary of major satellite measurements currently available for the tropospheric aerosol
characterization and radiative forcing research.
Category
Properties
Sensor/platform
Parameters
Spatial coverage Temporal coverage
Column-integrated
Loading
AVHRR/NOAA-series
MISR/Terra
OMI/Aura
Optical depth
TOMS/Nimbus, ADEOSI, EP
POLDER-1,2, PARASOL
MODIS/Terra. Aqua
-daily coverage of global
ocean
1981 present
-daily coverage of global
land and ocean
1979-2001
1997-present
2000-present (Terra)
2002-present (Aqua)
— weekly coverage of
global land and ocean,
including bright desert and
nadir sun-glint
-daily coverage of global
land and ocean
2000-present
2005-present
Size,
AVHRR/NOAA-series
POLDER-1,2, PARASOL
MODIS/T erra. Aqua
Angstrom exponent
Global ocean
1981 -present
Fine-mode fraction,
Angstrom exponent, non-
spherical fraction
Global land and ocean
1997-present
Fine-mode fraction
Angstrom exponent
Global land and ocean
(better quality over ocean)
Effective radium
Global ocean
Asymmetry factor
MISR/Terra Angstrom exponent, small,
medium large fractions,
non-spherical fractions
Global land and ocean
2000-present (Terra)
2002-present (Aqua)
2000-present
Absorption
TOMS/Nimbus, ADEOSI, EP
OMI/Aura
Absorbing aerosol index,
single-scattering albedo,
absorbing optical depth
Global land and ocean
MISR/Terra Single-scattering albedo (2-
4 bins)
1979-2001
2005-present
2000-present
Vertical-resolved
Loading, size, and
shape
GLAS/ICESat
CAUOP/CAUPSO
Extinction/backscatter
Extinction/backscatter,
color ratio, depolarization
ratio
Global land and ocean, 16-
day repeating cycle, single-
nadir measurement
2003-present
(~ 3 months/yr)
2006-present
Complementary to these passive sensors, active remote sensing from space is also
now possible and ongoing (see Box 2.5 of CCSP SAP2.3). Both the Geoscience Laser
Altimeter System (GLAS) and the Cloud and Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal
Polarization (CALIOP) are collecting essential information about aerosol vertical
distributions. Furthermore, the constellation of six afternoon-overpass spacecrafts (as
illustrated in Figure 9-60), the so-called A-Train (Stephens and et, 2002, 190412)
makes it possible for the first time to conduct near simultaneous (within 15 minutes)
July 2009 9-115 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
measurements of aerosols, clouds, and radiative fluxes in multiple dimensions with
sensors in complementary capabilities.
The improved accuracy of aerosol products (mainly AOD) from these new-
generation sensors, together with improvements in characterizing the earth's surface
and clouds, can help reduce the uncertainties associated with estimating the aerosol
direct radiative forcing (Yu H, et, 2006, 156173); and references therein). The
retrieved aerosol microphysical properties, such as size, absorption, and non-spherical
fraction can help distinguish anthropogenic aerosols from natural aerosols and hence
help assess the anthropogenic component of aerosol direct radiative forcing (Bellouin
et al., 2005, 155684; Christopher et al., 2006, 155729; Kaufman et al., 2005, 155891;
Yu H, et, 2006, 156173). However, to infer aerosol number concentrations and examine
indirect aerosol radiative effects from space, significant efforts are needed to measure
aerosol size distribution with much improved accuracy, characterize aerosol type,
account for impacts of water uptake on aerosol optical depth, and determine the
fraction of aerosols that is at the level of the clouds (Kapustin et al., 2006, 190961;
Rosenfeld, 2006, 190233). In addition, satellite remote sensing is not sensitive to
particles much smaller than 0.1 micrometer in diameter, which comprise of a
significant fraction of those that serve as cloud condensation nuclei.
Finally, algorithms are being developed to retrieve aerosol absorption or SSAfrom
satellite observations (e.g., Kaufman et al., 2002, 190955; Torres et al., 2005, 190507).
The NASA Glory mission, scheduled to launch in 2009 and to be added to the A"Train,
will deploy a multi-angle, multispectral polarimeter to determine the global
distribution of aerosol and clouds. It will also be able to infer microphysical property
information, from which aerosol type (e.g., marine, dust, pollution, etc.) can be
inferred for improving quantification of the aerosol direct and indirect forcing on
climate (Mischenko et al., 2007, 190543).
In summary, major advances have been made in both passive and active aerosol
remote sensing from space in the past decade, providing better coverage, spatial
resolution, retrieved AOD accuracy, and particle property information. However, AOD
accuracy is still much poorer than that from surface "based sun photometers
(0.01-0.02), even over vegetated land and dark water where retrievals are most
reliable. Although there is some hope of approaching this level of uncertainty with a
new generation of satellite instruments, the satellite retrievals entail additional
sensitivities to aerosol and surface scattering properties. It seems unlikely that
satellite remote sensing could exceed the sun photometer accuracy without
introducing some as-yet-unspecified new technology. Spacebased lidars are for the
first time providing global constraints on aerosol vertical distribution, and multi-angle
imaging is supplementing this with maps of plume injection height in aerosol source
regions. Major advances have also been made during the past decade in
distinguishing aerosol types from space, and the data are now useful for validating
aerosol transport model simulations of aerosol air mass type distributions and
transports, particularly over dark water. But particle size, shape, and especially SSA
information has large uncertainty; improvements will be needed to better distinguish
anthropogenic from natural aerosols using space-based retrievals. The particle
microphysical property detail required to assess aerosol radiative forcing will come
largely from targeted in situ and surface remote sensing measurements, at least for
the near-future, although estimates of measurement-based aerosol RF can be made
from judicious use of the satellite data with relaxed requirements for characterizing
aerosol microphysical properties.
MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer. MODIS performs near
global daily observations of atmospheric aerosols. Seven of 36 channels (between 0.47
and 2.13 ]im) are used to retrieve aerosol properties over cloud and surface-screened
areas (Martins et al., 2002, 190470; Li et al., 2004, 190386). Over vegetated land,
MODIS retrieves aerosol optical depth at three visible channels with high accuracy of
± 0.05 ± 0.2t (Kaufman and Fraser, 1997, 190958; Chu et al., 2002, 190001; Remer et
al., 2005, 190221; Levy et al., 2007, 190379). Most recently a deep blue algorithm (Hsu
July 2009
9-116
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
et al., 2004, 190622) has been implemented to retrieve aerosols over bright deserts on
an operational basis, with an estimated accuracy of 20-30%. Because of the greater
simplicity of the ocean surface, MODIS has the unique capability of retrieving not
only aerosol optical depth with greater accuracy, i.e., ± 0.03 ± 0.05x (Tanre et al., 1997,
190452; Remer et al., 2002, 190218; 2005, 190221; Remer and et, 2008, 190224). but
also quantitative aerosol size parameters (e.g., effective radius, fine-mode fraction of
AOD) (Kaufman et al., 2002, 190956; Remer et al., 2005, 190221; Kleidman et al.,
2005, 190175). The fine-mode fraction has been used as a tool for separating
anthropogenic aerosol from natural ones and estimating the anthropogenic aerosol
direct climate forcing (Kaufman et al., 2005, 155891). Figure 9"56 shows composites of
MODIS AOD and fine-mode fraction that illustrate seasonal and geographical
variations of aerosol types. Clearly seen from the figure is heavy pollution over East
Asia in both months, biomass burning smoke over South Africa, South America, and
Southeast Asia in August, heavy dust storms over North Atlantic in both months and
over Arabian Sea in August, and a mixture of dust and pollution plume swept across
North Pacific in April.
Multi-Angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer. MISR, aboard the sun-
synchronous, polar orbiting satellite Terra, measures upwelling solar radiance in four
visible-near-IR spectral bands and at nine view angles spread out in the forward and
aft directions along the flight path (Diner et al., 2002, 189967). It acquires global
coverage about once per week. A wide range of along-track view angles makes it
feasible to more accurately evaluate the surface contribution to the TOA radiances
and hence retrieve aerosols over both ocean and land surfaces, including bright desert
and sunglint regions (Diner et al., 1998, 189962; Kahn RAGaitley et al., 2005,
190966; Martonchik et al., 1998, 190472; 2002, 190490). MISR AODs are within 20%
or ± 0.05 of coincident AERONET measurements (Abdou et al., 2005, 190028; Kahn et
al., 2005, 189961). The MISR multi -angle data also sample scattering angles ranging
from about 60° to 160° in midlatitudes, yielding information about particle size (Chen
et al., 2008, 189984; Kahn et al., 1998, 190970; 2001, 190969; 2005, 190966) and
shape (Kalashnikova and Kahn, 2006, 190962). The aggregate of aerosol
microphysical properties can be used to assess aerosol airmass type, a more robust
characterization of MISR-retrieved particle property information than individual
attributes. MISR also retrieves plume height in the vicinity of wildfire, volcano, and
mineral dust aerosol sources, where the plumes have discernable spatial contrast in
the multi-angle imagery (Kahn et al., 2007, 190964). Figure 9"57 is an example that
illustrates MISR's ability to characterize the load, optical properties, and stereo
height of near-source fire plumes.
POLarization and Directionality of the Earth's Reflectance, polder is a
unique aerosol sensor that consists of wide field-of-view imaging spectro-radiometer
capable of measuring multi-spectral, multi-directional, and polarized radiances
(Deuze et al., 2001, 192013). The observed radiances can be exploited to better
separate the atmospheric contribution from the surface contribution over both land
and ocean. POLDER "1 and "2 flew onboard the ADEOS (Advanced Earth Observing
Satellite) from November 1996 to June 1997 and April to October of 2003, respectively.
A similar POLDER instrument flies on the PARASOL satellite that was launched in
December 2004.
Figure 9"58 shows global horizontal patterns of AOD and Angstrom exponent over
the oceans derived from the POLDER instrument for June 1997. The oceanic AOD
map (Figure 9"58.a) reveals near-coastal plumes of high AOD, which decrease with
distance from the coast. This pattern arises from aerosol emissions from the
continents, followed by atmospheric dispersion, transformation, and removal in the
downwind direction. In large-scale flow fields, such as the trade winds, these
continental plumes persist over several thousand kilometers. The Angstrom exponent
shown in Figure 9"58 exhibits a very different pattern from that of the aerosol optical
depth; specifically, it exhibits high values downwind of industrialized regions and
regions of biomass burning, indicative of small particles arising from direct emissions
July 2009
9-117
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
from combustion sources and/or gas-to-particle conversion, and low values associated
with large particles in plumes of soil dust from deserts and in sea salt aerosols.
July 2009
9-118
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Source: Adapted from (Chin et al., 2007,190062); original figure from Yoram Kaufman and Reto Stockli.
July 2009
9-119
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Figure 9-56. A composite of MODIS/Terra observed aerosol optical depth (at 550 nm, green light near
the peak of human vision) and fine-mode fraction that shows spatial and seasonal
variations of aerosol types. Industrial pollution and biomass burning aerosols are
predominately small particles (shown as red), whereas mineral dust and sea salt consist
primarily of large particles (shown as green). Bright red and bright green indicate heavy
pollution and dust plumes, respectively.
a b c
Source: taken from Kahn et al. (2007,190964).
Figure 9-57. Oregon fire on September 4, 2003 as observed by MISR: (a) MISR nadir view of the fire
plume, with five patch locations numbered and wind-vectors superposed in yellow; (b)
MISR aerosol optical depth at 558 nm; and (c) MISR stereo height without wind
correction for the same region.
9.3.2.2. Focused Field Campaigns
Over the past two decades, numerous focused field campaigns have examined the
physical, chemical, and optical properties and radiative forcing of aerosols in a variety
of aerosol regimes around the world, as listed in Table 9-5. These campaigns, which
have been designed with aerosol characterization as the main goal or as one of the
major themes in more interdisciplinary studies, were conducted mainly over or
downwind of known continental aerosol source regions, but in some instances in low-
aerosol regimes, for contrast. During each of these comprehensive campaigns , aerosols
were studied in great detail, using combinations of in situ and remote sensing
observations of physical and chemical properties from various platforms (e .g. , aircraft,
ships, satellites, and ground-based stations) and numerical modeling. In spite of their
relatively short duration, these field studies have acquired comprehensive data sets of
July 2009
9-120
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Angstrom Exponent
(X = -d In rId In >.
regional aerosol properties that have been used to understand the properties and
evolution of aerosols within the atmosphere and to improve the climatology of aerosol
microphysical properties used in satellite retrieval algorithms and CTMs.
a
Optical Depth
>. 865 nrn
Reproduced with permission of Laboratoire d'Optique Atmospherique (LOA), Lille, FR; Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de I'Environnement
(LSCE), Gif sur Yvette, FR; Centre National d'etudes Spatiales (CNES), Toulouse, FR; and NAtional Space Development Agency (NASDA), Japan.
Figure 9-58. Global maps at 18 km resolution showing monthly average (a) AOD at 865 nm and (hj
o
Angstrom exponent of AOD over water surfaces only for June, 1997, derived from
radiance measurements by the POLDER.
9.3.2.3. Ground-Based In Situ Measurement Networks
Major U.S."operated surface in situ and remote Sensing networks for tropospheric
aerosol characterization and climate, forcing research are listed in Table !H>. These
surface in situ stations provide information about long-term changes and trends in
aerosol concentrations and properties, the influence of regional sources on aerosol
properties, climatologies of aerosol radiative properties, and data for testing models
and satellite aerosol retrievals. The. MQAAEarth System Research Laboratory (ESRL)
aerosol monitoring network consists of baseline, regional, and mobile Stations. These
near-surface measurements include submicrometer and sub-10 micrometer scattering
and absorption coefficients from which the extinction coefficient and single-scattering
albedo can be derived. Additional measurements include particle concentration and, at
selected sites, OCN concentration, the hygroscopic growth factor, and chemical
composition.
July 2009
9-121
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Several of the stations, which are located across North America and world-wide,
are in regions where recent focused field campaigns have been conducted. The
measurement protocols at the stations are similar to those used during the field
campaigns. Hence, the station data are directly comparable to the field campaign data
so that they provide a longer-term measure of mean aerosol properties and their
variability, as well as a context for the shorter-duration measurements of the field
campaigns.
The Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environment (IMPROVE), which
is operated by the NP Service Air Resources Division, has stations across the U.S.
located within national parks (Malm et al., 1994, 044920). Although the primary focus
of the network is air pollution, the measurements are also relevant to climate forcing
research. Measurements include fine and coarse mode (PM2.5 and PM10) aerosol mass
concentration; concentrations of elements, sulfate, nitrate, organic carbon, and
elemental carbon! and scattering coefficients.
In addition, to these U.S.-operated networks, there are other national and
international surface networks that provide measurements of aerosol properties
including, but not limited to, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) Global
Atmospheric Watch (GAW) network
(httpy/www.wmo.int/pages/prog/arep/gaw/monitoring.html). the European Monitoring
and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) (http 7/www.emep .int/). the Canadian Air and
Precipitation Monitoring Network (CAPMoN) (http V/www.msc-
smc.ec.gc.ca/capmon/index e.cfm). and the Acid Deposition Monitoring Network in
East Asia (EANET) (httpV/www.eanet.cc/eanet.html).
Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System, ceres measures
broadband solar and terrestrial radiances at three channels with a large footprint
(e.g., 20 km for CERES/Terra) (Wielicki et al., 1996, 190637). It is co-located with
MODIS and MISR aboard Terra and with MODIS on Aqua. The observed radiances
are converted to TOAirradiances or fluxes using the Angular Distribution Models
(ADMs) that are functions of viewing angle, sun angle, and scene type (Loeb and Kato,
2002, 190432; Loeb et al., 2005, 190436; Zhang et al., 2005, 190929). Such estimates of
TOA solar flux in clear-sky conditions can be compared to the expected flux for an
aerosol-free atmosphere, in conjunction with measurements of aerosol optical depth
from other sensors (e.g., MODIS and MISR) to derive the aerosol direct radiative
forcing (Christopher et al., 2006, 155729; Loeb and Manalo-Smith, 2005, 190433;
Patadia et al., 2008, 190558; Zhang and Christopher, 2003, 190928; Zhang et al., 2005,
190930). The derived instantaneous value is then scaled to obtain a daily average. A
direct use of the coarse spatial resolution CERES measurements would exclude
aerosol distributions in partly cloudy CERES scenes. Several approaches that
incorporate coincident, high spatial and spectral resolution measurements (e.g.,
MODIS) have been employed to overcome this limitation (Loeb and Manalo-Smith,
2005, 190433; Zhang et al., 2005, 190930).
Active Remote Sensing of Aerosols. Following the success of a
demonstration of lidar system aboard the U.S. Space Shuttle mission in 1994, i.e.,
Lidar In-space Technology Experiment (LITE) (Winker et al., 1996, 190914). the
Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS) was launched in early 2003 to become the
first polar orbiting satellite lidar. It provides global aerosol and cloud profiling for a
one-month period out of every three-to-six months. It has been demonstrated that
GLAS is capable of detecting and discriminating multiple layer clouds, atmospheric
boundary layer aerosols, and elevated aerosol layers (e.g.,Spinhirne et al., 2005,
190410). The Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations
(CALIPSO), launched on April 28, 2006, is carrying a lidar instrument (Cloud and
Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization - CALIOP) that has been collecting
profiles of the attenuated backscatter at visible and near-infrared wavelengths along
with polarized backscatter in the visible channel (Winker et al., 2003, 192017).
CALIOP measurements have been used to derive the above-cloud fraction of aerosol
extinction optical depth (Chand et al., 2008, 189974). one of the important factors
July 2009
9-122
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
determining aerosol direct radiative forcing in cloudy conditions. Figure 9-59 shows
an event, of trans-Atlantic transport. of Saharan dust captured by CALIPSO. Flying in
formation with the Aqua, AURA, POLDER, and OloudSat satellites, the vertically
resolved information is expected to greatly improve passive aerosol and cloud
retrievals as well as allow the retrieval of vertical distributions of aerosol extinction,
fine- and coarse-mode separately (Huneeus and 0 Boucher, 2007, 190624' Kaufman et
al.. 2003, 190954; Leon et al., 2003, 190366).
Source: Liu et al. (2008,156709).
Figure 9-59. A dust event that originated in the Sahara desert on 17 August 2007 and was
transported to the Gulf of Mexico. Red lines represent back trajectories indicating the
transport track of the dust event. Vertical images are 532 nm attenuated backscatter
coefficients measured by 0ALI0P when passing over the dust transport track. The letter
"D" designates the dust layer, and "S" represents smoke layers from biomass burning in
Africa (17-19 August) and South America (22 August). The track of the high-spectral-
resolution-lidar (HSRL) measurement is indicated by the white line superimposed on the
28 August CALIPSO image. The HSRL track is coincident with the track of the 28 August
CALIPSO measurement off the coast of Texas between 28.75°N and 29.08°N.
July 2009
9-123
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
9.3.2.4. In Situ Aerosol Profiling Programs
In addition to long-term ground based measurements, regular long-term aircraft
in situ measurements recently have been implemented at several locations. These
programs provide a statistically significant data set of the vertical distribution of
aerosol properties to determine spatial and temporal variability through the vertical
column and the influence of regional sources on that variability. In addition, the
measurements provide data for satellite and model validation. As part of its long-term
ground measurements, NOAAhas conducted regular flights over Bondville, Illinois
since 2006. Measurements include light scattering and absorption coefficients, the
relative humidity dependence of light scattering, aerosol number concentration and
size distribution, and chemical composition. The same measurements with the
exception of number concentration, size distribution, and chemical composition were
made by NOAA during regular overflights of DOE ARM's Southern Great Plains
(SGP) site from 2000-2007 (IOM et al., 2004, 190058)
(http'//www. esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/aero/net/index.html).
In summary of Sections 9.3.2.2, 9.3.2.3, and 9.3.2.4, in situ measurements of
aerosol properties have greatly expanded over the past two decades as evidenced by
the number of focused field campaigns in or downwind of aerosol source regions all
over the globe, the continuation of existing and implementation of new sampling
networks worldwide, and the implementation of regular aerosol profiling
measurements from fixed locations. In addition, in situ measurement capabilities
have undergone major advancements during this same time period. These
advancements include the ability to measure aerosol chemical composition as a
function of size at a time resolution of seconds to minutes (e.g.,Jayne et al., 2000,
190978). the development of instruments able to measure aerosol absorption and
extinction coefficients at high sensitivity and time resolution and as a function of
relative humidity (e.g.,Baynard et al., 2007, 151669; Lack et al., 2006, 190203). and
the deployment of these instruments across the globe on ships, at ground-based sites,
and on aircraft. However, further advances are needed to make this newly developed
instrumentation more affordable and turn "key so that it can be deployed more widely
to characterize aerosol properties at a variety of sites worldwide.
July 2009
9-124 DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Figure 9-60. A constellation of five spacecraft that overfly the Equator at about 1:30 PM, the so-
called A-Train, carries sensors having complementary capabilities, offering
unprecedented opportunities to study aerosols from space in multiple dimensions.
Table 9-5. List of major intensive field experiments that are relevant to aerosol research in a variety
of aerosol regimes around the globe conducted in the past two decades.
Intensive Field Experiments
Aerosol Regimes Major References
Name Location Time Period
Anthropogenic aerosol and TARFOX North Atlantic July 1996 Russell et al. (1999, 190363)
boreal forest from North
America and West Europe NEAQS North Atlantic July-August 2002 Ouinn and Bates (2003, 049189)
SCAR-A North America 1993 Remeret al. (1997,190216)
CLAMS East Coast of U.S. July-August 2001 Smith et al. (2005,190401)
INlf X NA, ICARTT North America Summer 2004 Fehsenfeld et al. (2006, 190531)
DOE AI0P Northern Oklahoma May 2003 Ferrare et al. (2006,190561)
MILAGR0
Mexico City, Mexico
March 2006
Molina etal. (2008,192019)
TexAQS/GoMACCS
Texas and Gulf of Mexico
August-September 2006
Jiang et al. (2008, 156609);
Luet al, (2008, 190455)
ARCTS
North-central Alaska to
Greenland (Arctic haze)
March-April 2008
http:llwww.espo.nasa.gov/arctasl
ARCTAS
Northern Canada (smoke)
June-July 2008
MINOS
Mediterranean region
July-August 2001
Lelieveld et al. (2002,190361)
LACE98
Lindberg, Germany
July-August 1998
Ansmann et al, (2002)
July 2009
9-125
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Intensive Field Experiments
Aerosols99
Atlantic
January-February 1999
Bates et al. (2001, 043385)
Brown haze in South Asia
INDOEX
Indian subcontinent and
Indian Ocean
January-April 1998 & 1999
Ramanathan et al. (2001,190196)
ABC
South and East Asia
Ongoing
Ramanathan and Crutzen (2003,190198)
Anthropogenic aerosol and
EAST-AIRE
China
March-April 2005
Li et al. (2007,190392)
desert dust mixture from
East Asia
INTEX-B
Northeastern Pacific
April 2006
Singh et al. (2008,190394)
ACE-Asia
East Asian and Northwest
Pacific
April 2001
Huebert et al. (2003,190623);
Seinfeld et al. (2004,190388)
TRACE-P
March-April 2001
Jacob et al. (2003,190987)
PEM-West A & B
Western Pacific off East
Asia
September-October 1991
February-March 1994
Hoell et al. (1996,190607; 1997, 057373)
Biomass burning smoke in
BASE-A
Brazil
1989
Kaufman et al. (1992, 044557)
the tropics
SCAR-B
Brazil
August-September 1995
Kaufman et al. (1998, 089989)
LBA-SMOCC
Amazon basin
September-November 2002
Andreae et al. (2004,155658)
SAFARI2000
South Africa and South
August-September 2000
King et al. (2003, 094395)
SAFARI92
Atlantic
September-October 1992
Lindesav et al. (1996,190403)
TRACE-ADABEX
South Atlantic
September-October 1992
Fishman et al. (1996,190566)
DABEX
West Africa
January-February 2006
Haywood et al. (2008,190602)
Mineral dusts from North
SAMUM
Southern Morocco
May-June 2006
Heintzenberg et al. (2008,190605)
Africa and Arabian Peninsula
SHADE
West coast of North Africa
September 2000
Tanre et al. (2003,190454)
PRIDE
Puerto Rico
June-July 2000
Reid et al. (2003,190213)
UAE2
Arabian Peninsula
August-September 2004
Reid et al. (2008,190214)
Remote oceanic aerosol
ACE-1
Southern Oceans
December 1995
Bates et al. (1998,190063);
Quinn and Coffman (1998,190918)
Source: (Yu, 2006,156173) (Updated)
Table 9-6. Summary of major U.S. surface in situ and remote sensing networks for the tropospheric
aerosol characterization and radiative forcing research. All the reported quantities are
column-integrated or column-effective, except as indicated.
Surface Network
Measured/Derived Parameters
Loading Size, Shape Absorption Chemistry
Spatial Temporal
Coverage Coverage
In situ NOAA ESRL aerosol monitoring
Near-surface
Angstrom
Single-scattering
Chemical
5 baseline 1976 onward
(http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/aero/)
extinction
exponent,
albedo,
composition in
stations, several
coefficient,
hemispheric
absorption
selected sites and
regional
optical depth,
backscatter
coefficient
periods
stations,
CN/CNN number
fraction,
aircraft and
concentrations
asymmetry
factor,
hygroscopic
growth
mobile
platforms
July 2009
9-126
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Measured/Derived Parameters
NPSfEPA IMPROVE
(http:ff\rist8.eira.cnlo8tatB.8du)iroprov8j)
Near-surface
mass
concentrations
and derived
extinction
coefficients by
species
Fine and coarse
separately
Single-scattering
albedo,
absorption
coefficient
Ions, ammonium
SO42, ammonium
nitrate organics,
EC, fine soil
156 national
parks and
wilderness
areas in the
U.S.
1S88 onward
Remote NASA AERONET (http://aeronet-Hsfc.nasa.nov) Optical depth
Sensing
DOE ARM (http:ffwww.arm.gov)
NOAA SURFRAD
(http:ffwww.srrb. noaa.govfsurfradf)
AERONET-MAN
(http:ffaeronet.gsfc.nasa.govfmaritime aerosol
network.html)
Fine-mode
fraction,
Angstrom
exponents,
asymmetry
factor, phase
function, non-
spherical fraction
Single-scattering
albedo,
absorption optical
depth, refractive
indices
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
— 200 sites 1993 onward
over global land
and islands
6 sites and 1 1989 onward
mobile facility in
N. America,
Europe, and
Asia
7 sites in the
U.S.
1995 onward
Global Ocean 2004-present
periodically
NASA MP1.NET (http:ffmplnet.gsfc.n3sa.govf)
Vertical profiles N/A
of backscatterf
extinction
coefficient
N/A
N/A
— 30 sites in
major
continents,
usually
co-located with
AERONET and
ARM sites
2000 onward
Figure 9-61. Geographical coverage of active AERONET sites in 2006.
9.3.2.5. Ground-Based Remote Sensing Measurement Networks
The Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) program is a federated ground"based
remote sensing network of well-calibrated sun photometers and radiometers
(http 7/aeronet .gsfc .nasa.gov).
July 2009
9-127
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
AERONET includes about 200 sites around the world, covering all major
tropospheric aerosol regimes (Holben et al., 1998, 155848; 2001, 190618). as
illustrated in Figure 9"61. Spectral measurements of sun and sky radiance are
calibrated and screene d for cloud-free conditions (Smirnov et al., 2000, 190397).
AERONET stations provide direct, calibrated measurements of spectral AOD
(normally at wavelengths of 440, 670, 870, and 1020 nm) with an accuracy of ± 0.015
(Eck et al., 1999, 190390). In addition, inversion-based retrievals of a variety of
effective, column-mean properties have been developed, including aerosol single-
scattering albedo, size distributions, fine-mode fraction, degree of non-sphericity,
phase function, and asymmetry factor (Dubovik and King, 2000, 190197! Dubovik et
al., 2000, 190177; Dubovik et al., 2002, 190202; O'Neill et al., 2003, 180187). The SSA
can be retrieved with an accuracy of ± 0.03, but only for AOD >0.4 (Dubovik et al.,
2002, 190202). which precludes much of the planet. These retrieved parameters have
been validated or are undergoing validation by comparison to in situ measurements
(e.g.,Haywood et al., 2003, 190599; Leahy et al., 2007, 190232; Magi et al., 2005,
190468).
Recent developments associated with AERONET algorithms and data products
include-
¦ simultaneous retrieval of aerosol and surface properties using combined AERONET
and satellite measurements (Sinyuk and et, 2007, 190395) with surface reflectance
taken into account (which significantly improves AERONET SSA retrieval accuracy)
(Eck et al., 2008, 190409);
¦ the addition of ocean color and high frequency solar flux measurements; and
¦ the establishment of the Maritime Aerosol Network (MAN) component to monitor
aerosols over the World oceans from ships of- opportunity (Smirnov et al., 2006,
190400).
Because of consistent calibration, cloud-screening, and retrieval methods,
uniformly acquired and processed data are available from all stations, some of which
have operated for over 10 years. These data constitute a high-quality, ground-based
aerosol climatology and, as such, have been widely used for aerosol process studies as
well as for evaluation and validation of model simulation and satellite remote sensing
applications (e.g., Chin et al., 2002, 189996; Kahn RAGaitley et al., 2005, 190966;
Remer et al., 2005, 190221; Yu et al., 2003, 156171; 2006, 156173). In addition,
AERONET retrievals of aerosol size distribution and refractive indices have been used
in algorithm development for satellite sensors (Levy et al., 2007, 190377; Remer et al.,
2005, 190221). A set of aerosol optical properties provided by AERONET has been
used to calculate the aerosol direct radiative forcing (Procopio et al., 2004, 190571;
Zhou M, et, 2005, 156183). which can be used to evaluate both satellite remote
sensing measurements and model simulations.
AERONET measurements are complemented by other ground-based aerosol
networks having less geographical or temporal coverage, such as the Atmospheric
Radiation Measurement (ARM) network (Ackerman and Stokes, 2003, 192080).
NOAA's national surface radiation budget network (SURFRAD) (Augustine et al.,
2008, 189913) and other networks with multifilter rotating shadowband radiometer
(MFRSR) (Harrison et al., 1994, 045805; Michalsky et al., 2001, 190537). and several
lidar networks including-
¦ NASA Micro Pulse Lidar Network (MPLNET) (Welton et al., 2001, 157133) (2002,
190631);
¦ Regional East Atmospheric Lidar Mesonet (REALM) in North America (Hoff and
McCann, 2002, 190612; 2004, 190617);
¦ European Aerosol Research Lidar Network (EARLINET) (Matthias, 2004, 155971); and
¦ Asian Dust Network (AD-Net) (e.g.,Murayama T, et, 2001, 155992).
Obtaining accurate aerosol extinction profile observations is pivotal to improving
aerosol radiative forcing and atmospheric response calculations. The values derived
from these lidar networks with state-of-the-art techniques (Schmid et al., 2006,
190372) are helping to fill this need.
July 2009
9-128
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
9.3.2.6. Synergy of Measurements and Model Simulations
Individual approaches discussed above have their own strengths and limitations,
and are usually complementary. None of these approaches alone is adequate to
characterize large spatial and temporal variations of aerosol physical and chemical
properties and to address complex aerosol-climate interactions. The best strategy for
characterizing aerosols and estimating their radiative forcing is to integrate
measurements from different satellite sensors with complementary capabilities from
in situ and surface based measurements. Similarly, while models are essential tools
for estimating regional and global distributions and radiative forcing of aerosols at
present as well as in the past and the future, observations are required to provide
following, several synergistic approaches to studying aerosols and their radiative
forcing are discussed.
Closure Experiments. During intensive field studies, multiple platforms and
instruments are deployed to sample regional aerosol properties through a well-
coordinated experimental design. Often, several independent methods are used to
measure or derive a single aerosol property or radiative forcing. This combination of
methods can be used to identify inconsistencies in the methods and to quantify
uncertainties in measured, derived, and calculated aerosol properties and radiative
forcings. This approach, often referred to as a closure experiment, has been widely
employed on both individual measurement platforms (local closure) and in studies
involving vertical measurements through the atmospheric column by one or more
platforms (column closure) (Quinn et al., 1996, 192021 j Russell et al., 1997, 190359).
Past closure studies have revealed that the best agreement between methods
occurs for submicrometer, spherical particles such that different measures of aerosol
optical properties and optical depth agree within 10-15% and often better (e.g.,Clarke
et al., 1996, 190003; Collins et al., 2000, 190059; Schmid and et, 2000, 190369; Quinn
et al., 2004, 190937). Larger particle sizes (e.g., sea salt and dust) present inlet
collection efficiency issues and non-spherical particles (e.g., dust) lead to differences in
instrumental responses. In these cases, differences between methods for determining
aerosol optical depth can be as great as 35% (Doherty et al., 2005, 190027; Wang et al.,
2003, 157106). Closure studies on aerosol clear-sky DRF reveal uncertainties of about
25% for sulfate/carbonaceous aerosol and 60% for dust-containing aerosol (Bates et al.,
2006, 189912). Future closure studies could integrate surface- and satellite-based
radiometric measurements of AOD with in situ optical, microphysical, and aircraft
radiometric measurements for a wide range of situations. There is also a need to
maintain consistency in comparing results and expressing uncertainties (Bates et al.,
2006, 189912).
Constraining Models with In Situ Measurements. In situ measurements of
aerosol chemical, microphysical, and optical properties with known accuracy, based in
part on closure studies, can be used to constrain regional CTM simulations of aerosol
direct forcing, as described by Bates et al. (2006, 189912). A key step in the approach
is assigning empirically derived optical properties to the individual chemical
components generated by the CTM for use in a Radiative Transfer Model (RTM).
Specifically, regional data from focused, short-duration field programs can be
segregated according to aerosol type (sea salt, dust, or sulfate/carbonaceous) based on
measured chemical composition and particle size. Corresponding measured optical
properties can be carried along in the sorting process so that they, too, are segregated
by aerosol type. The empirically derived aerosol properties for individual aerosol
types, including mass scattering efficiency, single-scattering albedo, and asymmetry
factor, and their dependences on relative humidity, can be used in place of assumed
values in CTMs. Short-term, focused measurements of aerosol properties (e.g., aerosol
concentration and AOD) also can be used to evaluate CTM parameterizations on a
regional basis, to suggest improvements to such uncertain model parameters, such as
emission factors and scavenging coefficients (e.g., Koch et al., 2007, 190185).
Improvements in these parameterizations using observations yield increasing
July 2009
9-129
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
confidence in simulations covering regions and periods where and when
measurements are not available. To evaluate the aerosol properties generated by
CTMs on broader scales in space and time, satellite observations and long-term in situ
measurements are required.
Improved Model Simulations with Satellite Measurements. Global
measurements of aerosols from satellites (mainly AOD) with well-defined accuracies
offer an opportunity to evaluate model simulations at large spatial and temporal
scales. The satellite measurements can also be used to constrain aerosol model
simulations and hence the assessment of aerosol DRF through data assimilation or
objective analysis process (e.g., Collins et al., , 189987; Yu et al., 2003, 156171 j 2004,
190926; 2006, 156173; Liu et al., 2005, 190414; Zhang et al., 2008, 190932). Both
satellite retrievals and model simulations have uncertainties. The goal of data
integration is to minimize the discrepancies between them, and to form an optimal
estimate of aerosol distributions by combining them, typically with weights inversely
proportional to the square of the errors of individual descriptions. Such integration
can fill gaps in satellite retrievals and generate global distributions of aerosols that
are consistent with ground-based measurements (Collins et al., , 189987; Yu et al.,
2003, 156171; 2006, 156173; Liu et al., 2005, 190414). Recent efforts have also focused
on retrieving global sources of aerosol from satellite observations using inverse
modeling, which may be valuable for reducing large aerosol simulation uncertainties
(Dubovik et al., 2007, 190211). Model refinements guided by model evaluation and
integration practices with satellite retrievals can then be used to improve aerosol
simulations of the pre- and post-satellite eras. Current measurement-based
understanding of aerosol characterization and radiative forcing is assessed in
Section 9.3.3 through intercomparisons of a variety of measurement-based estimates
and model simulations published in literature. This is followed by a detailed
discussion of major outstanding issues in Section 9.3.4.
July 2009
9-130
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
E
s
Source: Bates et al. !2008,189912).
Figure 9-62. Comparison of the mean concentration (Clg/m3) and standard deviation of the modeled
(STEM) aerosol chemical components with shipboard measurements during INDOEX,
ACE Asia, and ICARTT.
Further complexity is added when attempting to relate surface PM2.5 to aerosol optical
depths. The main approach to derive surface PM2.5 from satellite optical depths from MISR
is based on the use of model derived profiles to determine ratios of aerosol optical depth to
surface PM2.5 (Liu and Koutrakis, 2007, 187007; 2007, 192180; Van Donkelaar et al., 2006,
192108). Van Donkelaar et al. (2006, 192108) derived r = 0.69 (MODIS) and 0.58 (MISR)
with annual average ground based PM2.5 across the U.S. and Canada, For comparison, r
between AERONET total AOD and surface measurements was 0.71. On average, MODIS
tended to overestimate surface PM2.5 by about 5 ug/m:;, while MISR estimates were biased
high by about 3 ,ug/m3. Liu et al. (2007, 187007; 2007, 192180) used MISR derived fractional
AODs in their analysis and found improvement in the retrievals when fractional AODs
were used instead of total AOD, allowing for better fits to the radiance data. They found
that fractional AODs can explain 13-62% of the variability in PM2.5 and its components in
the eastern U.S. and 28-56% of the variability in the western U.S. The models tended to
m SKM -BD€>.
~ Otrtervftfebf* - WOO
m STEW ACE Abu
B viHwtt -
m ST£M-IC4mr
C-3 CfcHfirvalmn - ItAHTT
Arnmon/wCTi
m STEM WDEIEX
E=3 GfcMrwADOH MDGEX
m STEM - ACE-Aam
S3 OfcBifvirten - ACE-A«*
mp gTSM CAFrTT
EZJ OhsBrvBtxni CARTT
¦II m,
Sulfate Ammonium BC
S^al0
POM
Sea Salt
July 2009
9-131
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
underpredict PM2.5 by ~7"8% in both the East and West. The relative errors in surface PM2.5
were estimated to be 30% in the East and 34% in the West. For AODs >0.15 (nominal
continental background values), dust particles could be distinguished from other particles
with an estimated error of 4%. Performance improves substantially over polluted urban
areas because they have much larger AOD. For example, Gupta et al. (2006, 137694)
derived a Pearson r between MODIS AOD and surface PM2.5 of 0.96 for several urban areas
around the world.
9.3.3. Assessments of Aerosol Characterization and Climate
Forcing
Sections 9.3.3 through 9.3.6 come directly from CCSP SAP2.3 Chapters 2, Section 2.3
through Chapter 3, Section 3.8, with section, table, and figure numbers changed to be
internally consistent with this ISA.
This section focuses on the assessment of measurement-based aerosol
characterization and its use in improving estimates of the direct radiative forcing on
regional and global scales. In situ measurements provide highly accurate aerosol
chemical, microphysical, and optical properties on a regional basis and for the
particular time period of a given field campaign. Remote sensing from satellites and
ground-based networks provide spatial and temporal coverage that intensive field
campaigns lack. Both in situ measurements and remote sensing have been used to
determine key parameters for estimating aerosol direct radiative forcing including
aerosol single scattering albedo, asymmetry factor, optical depth Remote sensing has
also been providing simultaneous measurements of aerosol optical depth and
radiative fluxes that can be combined to derive aerosol direct radiative forcing at the
TOA with relaxed requirement for characterizing aerosol properties. Progress in using
both satellite and surface-based measurements to study aerosol-cloud interactions and
aerosol indirect forcing is also discussed.
9.3.3.1. The Use of Measured Aerosol Properties to Improve Models
The wide variety of aerosol data sets from intensive field campaigns provides a
rigorous "testbed" for model simulations of aerosol properties and distributions and
estimates of DRF. As described in Section 9.3.2.6, in situ measurements can be used to
constrain regional CTM simulations of aerosol properties, DRF, anthropogenic
component of DRF, and to evaluate CTM parameterizations. In addition, in situ
measurements can be used to develop simplifying parameterizations for use by CTMs.
Several factors contribute to the uncertainty of CTM calculations of size-
distributed aerosol composition including emissions, aerosol removal by wet
deposition, processes involved in the formation of secondary aerosols and the chemical
and microphysical evolution of aerosols, vertical transport, and meteorological fields
including the timing and amount of precipitation, formation of clouds, and relative
humidity. In situ measurements made during focused field campaigns provide a point
of comparison for the CTM-generated aerosol distributions at the surface and at
discrete points above the surface. Such comparisons are essential for identifying areas
where the models need improvement.
July 2009
9-132
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
(Winter).
5.2 iigrtn
ISurnmur).
14.0 ug.m
PSf,, NY
12
13 pgkVn
Ho-tiS-ioik
T*
Wrtraai* gli
^ 2.1 Mg>Pn'
«
1 & yfli'm'1
12
TORCH 1. UK TOftCH 2, UK
T.ifi jig'm'
Hyyiia-la
Fnitencl,
2.0 M9>'ni
QUEST Tawny*, Q««m*ny
Finland ,
2.S Mg/m liM^Wt
31 pgftn
0
Mexico City
2.8
Duke Forest
NC
BS^yn"
ort Coast NE
US
Jungfimijoclh
Switzerland
• 0
Chejii Island Okinawa Island
Korea Japan
Mace Head
Ireland
Fukuc Island
Japan
| |Qrgarfccs Sutf-ato Nitrate jj^H ^nirnci^irn |HB Chiorkfe Urtwn Downwind Urban Rural - ftomofic
Source: Adapted from Zhang et al. (2007,189998).
Figure 9-63. Location of aerosol chemical composition measurements with aerosol mass
spectrometers. Colors for the labels indicate the type of sampling location: urban areas
(blue), < 100 miles downwind of major cites (black), and rural/remote areas > 100 miles
downwind (pink). Pie charts show the average mass concentration and chemical
composition: organics (green), Sth2' (red), nitrate (blue), ammonium (orange), and chloride
(purple), of non-refractory PMi.
Figure 9-62 shows a comparison of submicrometer and supermicromet'er aerosol
chemical components measured during INT.'1 >MX. AOEAsia, andlOARTT onboard a
ship and the same values; calculated with the STEM Model (e.g., Bates et al.. 2004,
189958. Garmichael et al., 2002, 148319: Carmichael et al., 2003, 190042: Streets et
al.. 2006, 157019: Tang ami el. 2003, 190441; Tang and et, 2004. 190445). To permit
direct comparison of the measured and modeled values;, the model was driven by
analyzed meteorological data and sampled at the times and locations of the shipboard
measurements every 80 rain along the cruise track. The best agreement was found for
submicrometer sulfate and BO. The agreement was best for sulfate; this is attributed
to greater accuracy in emissions, chemical conversion, and removal for this
component:. Underestimation of dust and sea salt is most likely due to errors in model-
calculated emissions. Large discrepancies between the modeled and measured values
occurred for submicrometer particulate organic matter (POM) (INDOEX), and for
particles in the supermicrometer size range such as dust (AGE-Asia), and sea salt (all
regions). The model underestimated the total mass of the supermicrometer aerosol by
about a factor of 3. POM makes up a large and variable fraction of aerosol mass
throughout the anthropogenically influenced northern hemisphere, ami yel models
have severe problems in properly representing this type of aerosol. Much of this
discrepancy follows from the models inability to represent the formation of secondary
organic aerosols (SOA) from the precursor volatile organic: compounds (VQC) . Figure
9-63 shows a summary of the results from aerosol mass spectrometer measurements;
July 2009
9-133
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
at 30 sites over North America, Europe, and Asia. Based on aircraft measurements of
urban-influenced air over New England, de Gouw et al. (2005, 190020) found that
POM was highly correlated with secondary anthropogenic gas phase species
suggesting that the POM was derived from secondary anthropogenic sources and that
the formation took one day or more,
1 -]¦
0
10
2D
30
P^otDCtwmiGal age (h I
i i i r
0,0 0,5 1.0 1.5
Acetylene (ppbv)
1 1 1 [
0 10 20 30
Iso-propyl nitrate (pptv)
Source: Adapted from de Guow et al. (2005,190020).
Figure 9-64. Scatterplots of the submicrometer POM measured during NEAQS versus A) acetylene
and Bj iso-propyl nitrate. The colors of the data points in A) denote the photochemical
age as determined by the ratios of compounds of known OH reactivity. The gray area in
A) shows the range of ratios between submicrometer POM and acetylene observed by
Kirchstetter et al. (1999, 010642) in tunnel studies.
Figure 9"64 shows seni lorplois of submicrometer POM versus acetylene (a gas
phase primary emitted \ < ><' species) and isopropyl nitrate (a secondary gas phase
organic species formed by atmospheric reactions). The increase in submicrometer
POM with increasing photochemical age could not be explained by the removal of
VOO alone, which are its traditionally recognized precursors. This result suggests
that other species must have contributed and/or that the mechanism for POM
formation is more efficient than assumed by models. Similar results were obtained
from the 2006 MILAGEQ field campaign conducted in Mexico City (IvLeinman et al.,
2008, 190074). and comparisons of GCM results with several long-term monitoring
stations also showed that the model underestimated organic aerosol concentrations
(Koch et; al,, 2007, 190185). Recent laboratory work suggests that isoprene may be a
major SOAsource missing from previous atmospheric models (Kroll et al., 2006,
190195; Henze and Seinfeld, 2006) 190606), but underestimating sources from certain
economic sectors may also play a role (Koch et al., 2007, 190185). Models also have
difficulty in representing the vertical distribution of organic aerosols, underpredicting
their occurrence in the free 'troposphere (FT) (Heakl et al., 2005, 190603). While
organic aerosol presents models with some of their greatest challenges, even the
distribution of well-characterized sulfate aerosol is not always estimated correctly in
models (Shindell el al.. 2008, 190391).
Comparisons of DRF and its anthropogenic component calculated with assumed
optical properties and values constrained by in situ measurements Can help identify
July 2009
9-134
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
areas of uncertainty in model parameterizations. In a study described by Bates et al.
(2006, 189912). two different CTMs (MOZART and STEM) were used to calculate dry
mass concentrations of the dominant aerosol species (sulfate, organic carbon, BC, sea
salt, and dust).
In situ measurements were used to calculate the corresponding optical properties
for each aerosol type for use in a radiative transfer model. Aerosol DRF and its
anthropogenic component estimated using the empirically derived and a priori optical
properties were then compared. The DRF and its anthropogenic component were
calculated as the net downward solar flux difference between the model state with
aerosol and of the model state with no aerosol. It was found that the constrained
optical properties derived from measurements increased the calculated AOD (34 ±
8%), TOA DRF (32 ± 12%), and anthropogenic component of TOA DRF (37 ± 7%)
relative to runs using the a priori values. These increases were due to larger values of
the constrained mass extinction efficiencies relative to the a priori^ alues. In addition,
differences in AOD due to using the aerosol loadings from MOZART versus those from
STEM were much greater than differences resulting from the apriorivs. constrained
RTM runs. In situ observations also can be used to generate simplified
parameterizations for CTMs and RTMs thereby lending an empirical foundation to
uncertain parameters currently in use by models. CTMs generate concentration fields
of individual aerosol chemical components that are then used as input to radiative
transfer models (RTMs) for the calculation of DRF. Currently, these calculations are
performed with a variety of simplifying assumptions concerning the RH dependence of
light scattering by the aerosol. Chemical components often are treated as externally
mixed each with a unique RH dependence of light scattering. However, both model
and measurement studies reveal that POM, internally mixed with water-soluble salts,
can reduce the hygroscopic response of the aerosol, which decreases its water content
and ability to scatter light at elevated relative humidity (e.g., Saxena et al., 1995,
077273; Carrico et al., 2005, 190052). The complexity of the POM composition and its
impact on aerosol optical properties requires the development of simplifying
parameterizations that allow for the incorporation of information derived from field
measurements into calculations of DRF (Quinn et al., 2005, 156033). Measurements
made during INDOEX, ACE-Asia, and ICARTT revealed a substantial decrease in
iasp (RH) with increasing mass fraction of POM in the accumulation mode. Based on
these data, a parameterization was developed that quantitatively describes the
relationship between POM mass fraction and iosp (RH)for accumulation mode sulfate-
POM mixtures (Quinn et al., 2005, 156033). This simplified parameterization may be
used as input to RTMs to derive values of iosp (RH) based on CTM estimates of the
POM mass fraction. Alternatively, the relationship may be used to assess values of
£>sp (RH) currently being used in RTMs.
9.3.3.2. Intercomparisons of Satellite Measurements and Model Simulation of Aerosol
Optical Depth
As aerosol DRF is highly dependent on the amount of aerosol present, it is of first-
order importance to improve the spatial characterization of AOD on a global scale.
This requires an evaluation of the various remote sensing AOD data sets and
comparison with model-based AOD estimates. The latter comparison is particularly
important if models are to be used in projections of future climate states that would
result from assumed future emissions. Both remote sensing and model simulation
have uncertainties and satellite-model integration is needed to obtain an optimum
description of aerosol distribution.
Figure 9"65 shows an intercomparison of annual average AOD at 550 nm from
two recent satellite aerosol sensors (MODIS and MISR), five model simulations
(GOCART, GISS, SPRINTARS, LMDZ-LOA, LMDZ-INCA) and three satellite-model
integrations (MO_GO, MI_GO, MO_MI_GO). These model-satellite integrations are
conducted by using an optimum interpolation approach (Yu et al., 2003, 156171) to
July 2009
9-135
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
constrain GOCART simulated AOD with that from MODIS, MISR, or MODIS over
ocean and MISR over land, denoted as MO_GO, MI_GO, and MO_MI_GO,
respectively. MODIS values of AOD are from Terra Collection 4 retrievals and MISR
AOD is based on early post launch retrievals. MODIS and MISR retrievals give a
comparable average AOD on the global scale, with MISR greater than MODIS by
0.01-0.02 depending on the season. However, differences between MODIS and MISR
are much larger when land and ocean are examined separately- AOD from MODIS is
0.02-0.07 higher over land but 0.03-0.04 lower over ocean than the AOD from MISR.
Several major causes for the systematic MODIS-MISR differences have been
identified, including instrument calibration and sampling differences, different
assumptions about ocean surface boundary conditions made in the individual retrieval
algorithms, missing particle property or mixture options in the look-up tables, and
cloud screening (Kahn et al., 2007, 190963). The MODIS-MISR AOD differences are
being reduced by continuous efforts on improving satellite retrieval algorithms and
radiance calibration. The new MODIS aerosol retrieval algorithms in Collection 5
have resulted in a reduction of 0.07 for global land mean AOD (Levy et al., 2007,
190379). and improved radiance calibration for MISR removed ~40% of AOD bias over
dark water scenes (Kahn et al., 2005, 190965).
The annual and global average AOD from the five models is 0.19 ± 0.02 (mean ±
standard deviation) over land and 0.13 ± 0.05 over ocean, respectively. Clearly, the
model-based mean AOD is smaller than both MODIS" and MISRderived values
(except the GISS model). A similar conclusion has been drawn from more extensive
comparisons involving more models and satellites (Kinne et al., 2006, 155903). On
regional scales, satellite-model differences are much larger. These differences could be
attributed in part to cloud contamination (Kaufman et al., 2005, 155891; Zhang et al.,
2005, 190931) and 3D cloud effects in satellite retrievals (Kaufman et al., 2005,
155891! Wen et al., 2006, 179964) or to models missing important aerosol
sources/sinks or physical processes (Koren et al., 2007, 190192). Integrated satellite-
model products are generally in-between the satellite retrievals and the model
simulations, and agree better with AERONET measurements (e.g.,Yu et al., 2003,
156171). As in comparisons between models and in situ measurements (Bates et al.,
2006, 189912). there appears to be a relationship between uncertainties in the
representation of dust in models and the uncertainty in AOD, and its global
distribution.
For example, the GISS model generates more dust than the other models
(Figure 9-66), resulting in a closer agreement with MODIS and MISR in the global
mean (Figure 9"65). However, the distribution of AOD between land and ocean is quite
different from MODIS" and MISRderived values.
Figure 9"66 shows larger model differences in the simulated percentage
contributions of individual components to the total aerosol optical depth on a global
scale, and hence in the simulated aerosol single-scattering properties (e.g., single-
scattering albedo, and phase function), as documented in Kinne et al. (2006, 155903).
This, combined with the differences in aerosol loading (as characterized by AOD)
determines the model diversity in simulated aerosol direct radiative forcing, as
discussed later. However, current satellite remote sensing capability is not sufficient
to constrain model simulations of aerosol components.
July 2009
9-136
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Lind ¦Ocean ¦ Global
Figure 9-65. Comparison of annual mean aerosol optical depth (AOD)
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
&
iSS
DU
POM
IBC
SU
&
-------
Global Distributions. Figure 9-67 shows global distributions of aerosol optical
depth at 550 nm (left panel) and diurnally averaged clear-sky TOA DRF (right panel)
for March-April-May (MAM) based on the different approaches. The DRF at the
surface follows the same pattern as that at the TOA but is significantly larger in
magnitude because of aerosol absorption. It appears that different approaches agree
on large-scale patterns of aerosol optical depth and the direct radiative forcing. In this
season, the aerosol impacts in the Northern Hemisphere are much larger than those
in the Southern Hemisphere. Dust outbreaks andbiomass burning elevate the optical
depth to more than 0.3 over large parts of North Africa and the tropical Atlantic. In
the tropical Atlantic, TOA cooling as large as "10 W/m2 extends westward to Central
America. In eastern China, the optical depth is as high as 0.6-0.8, resulting from the
combined effects of industrial activities and biomass burning in the south, and dust
outbreaks in the north. The Asian impacts also extend to the North Pacific, producing
a TOA cooling of more than "10 W/m2. Other areas having large aerosol impacts
include Western Europe, midlatitude North Atlantic, and much of South Asia and the
Indian Ocean. Over the "roaring forties" in the Southern Hemisphere, high winds
generate a large amount of sea salt. Elevated optical depth, along with high solar
zenith angle and hence large backscattering to space, results in a band of TOA cooling
of more than "4 W/m2. However, there is also some question as to whether thin cirrus
(e.g., Zhang et al., 2005, 190931) and unaccounted-for whitecaps contribute to the
apparent enhancement in AOD retrieved by satellite. Some differences exist between
different approaches. For example, the early post-launch MISR retrieved optical
depths over the southern hemisphere oceans are higher than MODIS retrievals and
GOCART simulations. Over the "roaring forties," the MODIS derived TOA solar flux
perturbations are larger than the estimates from other approaches.
Table 9-7. Summary of approaches to estimating the aerosol direct radiative forcing in three
categories: (A) satellite retrievals; (B) satellite-model integrations; and (C) model
simulations.
Category Product Brief Description Identified Sources of Uncertainty Major References
A Satellite MODIS Using MODIS retrievals of a linked set of Radiance calibration, cloudaerosol discrimination, Remer and Kaufman (2006,
retrievals AOD, Wo, and phase function consistently instantaneous-to-diurnal scaling, RTM parameterizations 190222)
in conjunction with a radiative transfer
model (RTM) to calculate TOA fluxes that
best match the observed radiances.
M0DIS A Splitting MODIS AOD over ocean into Satellite AOD and FMF retrievals, overestimate due to Bellouin et al. (2005,155684)
mineral dust, sea salt, and biomass-burning summing up the compositional direct forcing, use of a single
and pollution; using AER0NET AER0NET site to characterize a large region
measurements to derive the size
distribution and single-scattering albedo for
individual components.
CERESA Using CERES fluxes in combination with Calibration of CERES radiances, large CERES footprint,
standard MODIS aerosol.
CERES B Using CERES fluxes in combination with
N0AA NESDIS aerosol from MODIS
radiances.
CERES C Using CERES fluxes in combination with
MODIS (ocean) and MISR (non-desert land)
aerosol with new angular models for
aerosols.
satellite AOD retrieval, radiance-to-flux conversion (ADM),
' instantaneous-to-diurnal scaling, narrow-to-broadband
conversion
Loeb and Manalo-Smith (2005,
190433); Loeb and Kato (2002,
190432)
Zhang et al. (2005, 086743;
2005,157185); Zhang and
Christopher (2003,190928);
Christopher et al. (2006,155729);
Patadia et al. (2008,190558)
July 2009
9-138
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Category
Product
Brief Description
identified Sources of Uncertainty
Major References
POLDER
Using POLDER AOD in combination with
prescribed aerosol models (similar to
MODIS).
Similar to MODIS
Boucher and Tanre (2000,
190041); Bellouin et al. (2003,
189911)
B. Satellite-
MODISG
Using GOCART simulations to fill AOD gaps
Propagation of uncertainties associated with both satellite
"Aerosol single-scattering albedo
model
integrations
MISRG
in satellite retrievals.
retrievals and model simulations (but the model-satellite
integration approach does result in improved AOD quality for
and asymmetry factor are taken
from GOCART simulations
MOGO
Integration of MODIS and GOCART AOD.
MO GO, and O MI GO)
*Yu et al. (2003,156171:2004,
MOMIGO
Integration of GOCART AOD with retrievals
from MODIS (Ocean) and MISR (Land).
190926; 2006,156173)
SeaWiFS
Using SeaWiFS AOD and assumed aerosol
models.
Similar to MODIS G and MISR G, too weak aerosol
absorption
Chouet al. (2002,190008)
C. Model
GOCART
Offline RT calculations using monthly avg
Emissions, parameterizations of a variety of sub-grid aerosol
Chin et al. (2002,189996); Yu et
simulations
aerosols with a time step of 30 min
(without the presence of clouds).
processes (e.g., wet and dry deposition, cloud convection,
aqueous-phase oxidation), assumptions on aerosol size,
al. (2004,190926)
SPRINTARS Online RT calculations every 3 hrs (cloud
fraction - 0).
absorption, mixture, and humidification of particles,
Meteorology fields, not fully evaluated surface albedo
schemes, RT parameterizations
Takemura et al. (2002,190438;
2005,190439)
GISS
Online model simulations and weighted by
clear-sky fraction.
Koch and Hansen (2005,190183);
Koch et al. (2006,190184)
LMDZ-INCA
Online RT calculations every 2 hrs (cloud
fraction - 0).
Balkanski et al. (2007,189979);
Schulz et al. (2006,190381);
Kinne et al. (2006,155903)
LMDZ-LOA
Online RT calculations every 2 hrs (cloud
fraction - 0).
Reddv et al. (2005,190207;
2005,190208)
Source: Adapted
I from Yu et al. (2006,156173).
July 2009
9-139
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
MOD S
MODIS
MISR
j%v*.
¦^k *mAfy «¦ r*.r v.*-"
¦ • 'V'r"
MO_MI_GO
- - •
'***'' * " * -lllr
55" V •
GOCART
CERES A
: .
: vi>,
• - A-'~^-r-|S. -*-'..
, ,
MO Ml GO
-^Tv^
GOCART
^:',2
.0 .05 .1 .15 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .8 I. -30 -20 -IS -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 5Wm
Figure 9-67. Geographical patterns of seasonally (MAM) averaged aerosol optical depth at 550 nm
(left panel) and the diurnally averaged clear-sky aerosol direct radiative (solar spectrum)
forcing (W|m2) at the T0A (right panel) derived from satellite (Terra) retrievals. MODIS
(Remer et al., 2005,190221; Remer and Kaufman, 2006,190222); MISR (Kahn RA
Gaitley et al., 2005,190966); and CERESA (Loeb and Manalo-Smith, 2005,110433);
GOCART simulations (Chin et al., 2002,189996; Yu et al., 2004,190926); and GOCART
M0DIS-MISR integrations (M0 Ml GO) (Yu H, et, 2006,156173).
July 2009
9-140
DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Global Mean. Figure 9-68 summarizes the measurement- and model-based
.estimates of clear-sky annual-averaged DRF at both the TOA and surface from 60°S to
60°N. Seasonal DRF values for individual estimates are summarized in Table. 9-8 and
Table 9"9 for ocean and land, respectively. Mean, median and standard error e
(s=a/(n-1)1/2), where ois standard deviation and n is the number of methods) are
calculated for measurement- and model-based.estimates separately. Note that
although the standard deviation or standard error reported here is not a fully rigorous
measure of a true experimental uncertainty, it is indicative of the uncertainty because
independent approaches with independent sources of errors are used (see Table 9-7; in
the modeling community, this is called the "diversity ;" see Section 9.3.6).
Ocean: For the TOA DRF, a majority of measurement-based and satellite-model
integration "based estimates agree with each other within about 10%. On annual
average, the measurement-based estimates give, the DRF of -.5.5 ± 0.2 \Y. m:: (mean ± e)
at the TOA and -8.7 ±0.7 W in- at the surface. This suggests that the ocean surface,
cooling is. about 60% larger than the coohng at the TOA- Model simulations give wide
ranges of DRF estimates at both the TOA and surface. The ensemble of five models
gives the annual average DRF (mean ± s) of -3.2 ± 0.6 W/m2 and '4,9 ±0.8 W/m2 at the
TOA and surface, respectively. On: average, the surface cooling is about 37%.larger
than the TOA cooling, smaller than the measurement-based estimate of surface and
TOA difference of 60%, However, the 'measurement-based' estimate of surface DRF is
actually a: calculated value, using poorly constrained particle properties.
Land: It remains challenging to use satellite measurements alone for
characterizing complex aerosol properties over land surfaces with high accuracy. As
such , DRF estimates over land have to rely largely on model simulations and satellite-
model integrations. On a global and annual average, the satellite-model integrated
approaches derive a mean DRF of -4.9 W/m2 at the TOA and -11.9 W/m2 at the surface
respectively. The surface, coohng is more than a factor of 2 larger than the. TOA cooling
because of aerosol absorption. Note that the TOA DRF of -4.9 W/m2 agrees quite well
with the most recent satellite-based estimate of -5.1 ±1.1 W/m2 over non-desert land
based on coincident measurements of MISR AOD and GERES solar flux (I '.Ml adia el
al., 2008, 190558). For comparisons, an ensemble of five model simulations derives a
DRF (mean ± s) over land of -3.0 ± 0.6 W/m2 at the TOA and -7.6 ±0.9 W/m2 at the
surface, respectively. Seasonal variations of DRF over land, as derived from both
measurements and models, are larger than those over ocean.
- Jb
e
5
iu -4
K
o
<
D
I" -2
" MOD
-IS
41
1
a
I
-I
oBS
MOO
OCEAN
LAND
OCEAH
LANE
Figure 9-68. Summary of observation- and model-based (denoted as 0BS and MOD, respectively)
estimates of clear-sky, annual average DRF at the TOA and at the surface. The box and
vertical bar represent median and standard error, respectively (taken from Yu H, et,
2006,156173).
July 2009
9-141
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table 9-8. Summary of seasonal and annual average clear-sky DRF (W/m2) at the TOA and the surface
(SFC) over global OCEAN derived with different methods and data.
DJF MAM JJA SON ANN
Products
TOA SFC TOA SFC TOA SFC TOA SFC TOA SFC
MODIS -5.9 -5.8 -6.0 -5.8 -5.9
MODIXA*
¦6.0
¦8.2
¦6.4
¦8.9
¦6.5
¦9.3
¦6.4
¦8.9
¦6.4
¦8.9
CERESA
¦5.3
¦6.1
¦5.4
¦5.1
¦5.5
CERESB
¦3.8
¦4.3
¦3.5
¦3.6
¦3.8
CERESC
¦5.3
¦5.4
¦5.2
¦5.3
MODISG
¦5.5
¦9.1
¦5.7
¦10.4
¦6.0
¦10.6
¦5.5
¦9.8
¦5.7
¦10.0
MISRG**
¦6.4
¦10.3
¦6.5
¦11.4
¦7.0
¦11.9
¦6.3
¦10.9
¦6.5
¦11.1
M0G0
¦4.9
¦7.8
¦5.1
¦9.3
¦5.4
¦9.4
¦5.0
¦8.7
¦5.1
¦8.8
M0MIG0
¦4.9
¦7.9
¦5.1
¦9.2
¦5.5
¦9.5
¦5.0
¦8.6
¦5.1
¦8.7
POLDER
¦5.7
¦5.7
¦5.8
¦5.6
¦5.7
¦5.2***
¦7.7***
SeaWiFS
¦6.0
¦6.6
¦5.2
¦5.8
¦4.9
¦5.6
¦5.3
¦5.7
¦5.4
¦5.9
Obs. Mean
¦5.4
¦8.3
¦5.6
¦9.2
¦5.6
¦9.4
¦5.4
¦8.8
¦5.5
¦8.7
Obs. Median
¦5.5
¦8.1
¦5.7
¦9.3
¦5.5
¦9.5
¦5.4
¦8.8
¦5.5
¦8.8
Obs. a
0.72
1.26
0.64
1.89
0.91
2.10
0.79
1.74
0.70
1.65
Obs. ~
0.23
0.56
0.20
0.85
0.29
0.94
0.26
0.78
0.21
0.67
GOCART
¦3.6
¦5.7
¦4.0
¦7.2
¦4.7
¦8.0
¦4.0
¦6.8
¦4.1
¦6.9
SPRINTARS
¦1.5
¦2.5
¦1.5
¦2.5
¦1.9
¦3.3
¦1.5
¦2.5
¦1.6
¦2.7
GISS
¦3.3
¦4.1
¦3.5
¦4.6
¦3.5
¦4.9
¦3.8
¦5.4
¦3.5
¦4.8
LMDZ-INCA
¦4.6
¦5.6
¦4.7
¦5.9
¦5.0
¦6.3
¦4.8
¦5.5
¦4.7
¦5.8
LMDZLOA
¦2.2
¦4.1
¦2.2
¦3.7
¦2.5
¦4.4
¦2.2
¦4.1
¦2.3
¦4.1
Mod. Mean
¦3.0
¦4.4
¦3.2
¦4.8
¦3.5
¦5.4
¦3.3
¦4.9
¦3.2
¦4.9
Mod Median
¦3.3
¦41.
¦3.5
¦4.6
¦3.5
¦4.9
¦3.8
¦5.4
¦3.5
¦4.8
Mod. cr
1.21
1.32
1.31
1.84
1.35
1.82
1.36
1.63
1.28
1.60
Mod. £
0.61
0.66
0.66
0.92
0.67
0.91
0.68
0.81
0.64
0.80
Mod.; Obs.
.60
.51
.61
.50
.64
.52
.70
.61
.64
.55
July 2009
9-142
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
DJF MAM JJA SON ANN
* High bias may result from adding the DRF of individual components to derive the total DRF (Bellouin et al., 2005,155684).
** High bias most likely results from an overall overestimate of 20% in early post-launch MISR optical depth retrievals (Kahn RA Gaitley et al., 2005,190966).
*** Bellouin et al. (2003,189911) use AERONET retrieval of aerosol absorption as a constraint to the method in Boucher and Tanre (2000,190041), deriving aerosol direct radiative forcing both
at the T0A and the surface.
Sources of data: M0DIS (Remer & Kaufman, 2006), M0DIS_A (Bellouin et al., 2005,155684), POLDER (Boucher and Tanre, 2000,190041; Bellouin et al., 2003,189911), CERES_A and
CERES B (Loeb and Manalo-Smith, 2005,190433), CERES_C (Zhang et al., 2005,190930), M0DIS_G, MISR_G, M0_G0, M0_MI_G0 (Yu et al., 2004,190926; 2006,156173), SeaWiFS (Chou
et al., 2002,190008), GOCART (Chin et al., 2002,189996; Yu et al., 2004,190926), SPRINTARS (Takemura et al., 2002,190438), GISS (Koch and Hansen, 2005,190183; Koch et al., 2006,
190184), LMDZ-INCA (Kinne et al., 2006,155903; Schulz et al., 2006,190381), LMDZ-LOA (Reddy et al., 2005,190207; Reddy et al., 2005,190208). Mean, median, standard deviation (ct), and
standard error (£) are calculated for observations (Obs) and model simulations (Mod) separately. The last row is the ratio of model median to observational median (taken from Yu H, et, 2006,
156173).
Table 9-9. Summary of seasonal and annual average clear-sky DRF (W/m2) at the TOA and the surface
(SFC) over global LAND derived with different methods and data.
DJF MAM JJA SON ANN
TOA
SFC
TOA
SFC
TOA
SFC
TOA
SFC
TOA
SFC
MODISG
¦4.1
¦9.1
¦5.8
¦14.9
¦6.6
¦17.4
¦5.4
¦12.8
¦5.5
¦13.5
MISRG
¦3.9
¦8.7
¦5.1
¦13.0
¦5.8
¦14.6
¦4.6
¦101.7
¦4.9
¦11.8
MOGO
¦3.5
¦7.5
¦5.1
¦12.9
¦5.8
¦14.9
¦4.8
¦10.9
¦4.8
¦11.6
MOMIGO
¦3.4
¦7.4
¦4.7
¦11.8
¦5.3
¦13.5
¦4.3
¦9.7
¦4.4
¦10.6
Obs. Mean
¦3.7
¦8.2
¦5.2
¦13.2
¦5.9
¦15.1
¦4.8
¦11.0
¦4.9
¦11.9
Obs. Median
¦3.7
¦8.1
¦5.1
¦13.0
¦5.8
¦14.8
¦4.7
¦10.8
¦4.9
¦11.7
Obs. a
0.33
0.85
0.46
1.29
0.54
1.65
0.46
1.29
0.45
1.20
Obs. ~
0.17
0.49
0.26
0.74
0.31
0.85
0.27
0.75
0.26
0.70
GOCART
02.9
¦6.1
¦4.4
¦10.9
¦4.8
¦12.3
¦4.3
¦9.3
¦4.1
¦9.7
SPRINTARS
¦1.4
¦4.0
¦1.5
¦4.6
¦2.0
¦6.7
¦1.7
¦5.2
¦1.7
¦5.1
GISS
¦1.6
¦3.9
¦3.2
¦7.9
¦3.6
¦9.3
¦2.5
¦6.6
¦2.8
¦7.2
LMDZ-INCA
¦3.0
¦5.8
¦4.0
¦9.2
¦6.0
¦13.5
¦4.3
¦8.2
¦4.3
¦9.2
LMDZ-LOA
¦1.3
¦5.4
¦1.8
¦6.4
¦2.7
¦8.9
¦2.1
¦6.7
¦2.0
¦6.9
Mod. Mean
¦2.0
¦5.0
¦3.0
¦7.8
¦3.8
¦10.1
¦3.0
¦7.2
¦3.0
¦7.6
Mod Median
¦1.6
¦5.4
¦3.2
¦7.9
¦3.6
¦9.3
¦2.5
¦6.7
¦2.8
¦7.2
Mod. CT
0.84
1.03
1.29
2.44
1.61
2.74
1.24
1.58
1.19
1.86
Mod. £
0.42
0.51
0.65
1.22
0.80
1.37
0.62
0.79
0.59
0.93
Mod.; Obs.
0.43
0.67
0.63
0.61
0.62
0.62
0.53
0.62
0.58
0.62
Sources of data: M0DISG, MISRG, M0G0, MOMIGO (Yu et al., 2004,190926; 2006,156173), GOCART (Chin et al., 2002,189996; Yu et al., 2004,190926),
SPRINTARS (Takemura et al., 2002,190438), GISS (Koch and Hansen, 2005,190183; Koch et al., 2006,190184), LMDZ-INCA (Balkanski et al., 2007, 189979; Kinne et
al., 2006,155903; Schulz et al., 2006,190381), LMDZ-LOA (Reddy et al., 2005,190207; Reddy et al., 2005,190208). Mean, median, standard deviation (cr), and
standard error (£) are calculated for observations (Obs) and model simulations (Mod) separately. The last row is the ratio of model median to observational median. (Taken
from Yu H, et, 2006,156173).
July 2009
9-143
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
The above analyses show that, on a global average, the measurement-based
estimates of DRF are 55-80% greater than the model-based estimates. The differences
are even larger on regional scales. Such measurement-model differences are a
combination of differences in aerosol amount (optical depth), single-scattering
properties, surface albedo, and radiative transfer schemes (Yu H, et, 2006, 156173). As
discussed earlier, MODIS retrieved optical depths tend to be overestimated by about
10-15% due to the contamination of thin cirrus and clouds in general (Kaufman et al.,
2005, 155891). Such overestimation of optical depth would result in a comparable
overestimate of the aerosol direct radiative forcing. Other satellite AOD data may
have similar contamination, which however has not yet been quantified. On the other
hand, the observations may be measuring enhanced AOD and DRF due to processes
not well represented in the models including humidification and enhancement of
aerosols in the vicinity of clouds (Koren et al., 2007, 190192).
From the perspective of model simulations, uncertainties associated with
parameterizations of various aerosol processes and meteorological fields, as
documented under the AEROCOM and Global Modeling Initiative (GMI) frameworks
(Kinne et al., 2006, 155903; Textor et al., 2006, 190456; Liu et al., 2007, 190427).
contribute to the large measurement-model and model-model discrepancies. Factors
determining the AOD should be major reasons for the DRF discrepancy and the
constraint of model AOD with well evaluated and bias reduced satellite AOD through
a data assimilation approach can reduce the DRF discrepancy significantly. Other
factors (such as model parameterization of surface reflectance, and model-satellite
differences in single-scattering albedo and asymmetry factor due to satellite sampling
bias toward cloud-free conditions) should also contribute, as evidenced by the
existence of a large discrepancy in the radiative efficiency (Yu H, et, 2006, 156173).
Significant effort will be needed in the future to conduct comprehensive assessments.
9.3.3.4. Satellite-Based Estimates of Anthropogenic Component of Aerosol Direct
Radiative Forcing
Satellite instruments do not measure the aerosol chemical composition needed to
discriminate anthropogenic from natural aerosol components. Because anthropogenic
aerosols are predominantly sub-micron, the fine-mode fraction derived from POLDER,
MODIS, or MISR might be used as a tool for deriving anthropogenic aerosol optical
depth. This could provide a feasible way to conduct measurement-based estimates of
anthropogenic component of aerosol direct radiative forcing (Kaufman et al., 2002,
190956). Such method derives anthropogenic AOD from satellite measurements by
empirically correcting contributions of natural sources (dust and maritime aerosol) to
the sub-micron AOD (Kaufman et al., 2005, 155891). The MODISbased estimate of
anthropogenic AOD is about 0.033 over oceans, consistent with model assessments of
0.030-0.036 even though the total AOD from MODIS is 25-40% higher than the
models (Kaufman et al., 2005, 155891). This accounts for 21 ± 7% of the MODIS"
observed total aerosol optical depth, compared with about 33% of anthropogenic
contributions estimated by the models. The anthropogenic fraction of AOD should be
much larger over land (i.e., 47 ± 9% from a composite of several models) (Bellouin et
al., 2005, 155684). comparable to the 40% estimated by Yu et al. (2006, 156173).
Similarly, the non-spherical fraction from MISR or POLDER can be used to separate
dust from spherical aerosol (Kahn et al., 2001, 190969; Kalashnikova and Kahn, 2006,
190962). providing another constraint for distinguishing anthropogenic from natural
aerosols.
There have been several estimates of anthropogenic component of DRF in recent
years. Table 9"10 lists such estimates of anthropogenic component of TOA DRF that
are from model simulations (Schulz et al., 2006, 190381) and constrained to some
degree by satellite observations (Kaufman et al., 2005, 155891; Bellouin et al., 2005,
155684; Bellouin et al., 2008, 189999; Chung et al., 2005, 155733; Christopher et al.,
2006, 155729; Matsui et al., 2006, 190495; Yu H, et, 2006, 156173; Quaas et al., 2008,
July 2009
9-144
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
190916^ Zhao et al., 2008, 190936). The satellite-based clear-sky DRF by
anthropogenic aerosols is estimated to be -1.1 ± 0.37 W/m2 over ocean, about a factor
of 2 stronger than model simulated "0.6 W/m2. Similar DRF estimates are rare over
land, but a few studies do suggest that the anthropogenic DRF over land is much
more negative than that over ocean (Yu H, et, 2006, 156173; Bellouin et al., 2005,
155684; Bellouin et al., 2008, 189999). On global average, the measurement-based
estimate of anthropogenic DRF ranges from "0.9 to "1.9 W/m2, again stronger than the
model-based estimate of "0.8 W/m2. Similar to DRF estimates for total aerosols,
satellite-based estimates of anthropogenic component of DRF are rare over land.
On global average, anthropogenic aerosols are generally more absorptive than
natural aerosols. As such the anthropogenic component of DRF is much more negative
at the surface than at TOA. Several observation-constrained studies estimate that the
global average, clear-sky, anthropogenic component of DRF at the surface ranges from
-4.2 to "5.1 W/m2 (Yu et al., 2004, 190926; Bellouin et al., 2005, 155684; Chung et al.,
2005, 155733; Matsui et al., 2006, 190495), which is about a factor of 2 larger in
magnitude than the model estimates (e.g., Reddy et al., 2005, 190208).
Uncertainties in estimates of the anthropogenic component of aerosol DRF are
greater than for the total aerosol, particularly over land. An uncertainty analysis (Yu
H, et, 2006, 156173) partitions the uncertainty for the global average anthropogenic
DRF between land and ocean more or less evenly. Five parameters, namely fine-mode
fraction (if) and anthropogenic fraction of fine-mode fraction C/af) over both land and
ocean, and rover ocean, contribute nearly 80% of the overall uncertainty in the
anthropogenic DRF estimate, with individual shares ranging from 13-20% (Yu H, et,
2006, 156173). These uncertainties presumably represent a lower bound because the
sources of error are assumed to be independent. Uncertainties associated with several
parameters are also not well defined. Nevertheless, such uncertainty analysis is
useful for guiding future research and documenting advances in understanding.
Table 9-10. Estimates of anthropogenic components of aerosol optical depth (Tant) and clear-sky DRF at
the TOA from model simulations
Data Sources
Ocean
Land
Global
Estimated uncertainty or
Tant
DRF
(W/m2)
Tant
DRF
(W/m2)
Tant
DRF
(W/m2)
model diversity for DRF
Kaufman et al. (2005,155891)
0.033
¦1.4
30%
Bellouin et al. (2005,155684)
0.028
¦0.8
0.13
0.062
¦1.9
15%
Chunq et al. (2005,155733)
¦1.1
Yu et al. (2006,156173)
0.031
¦1.1
-.088
¦1.8
0.048
¦1.3
47% (ocean), 845 (land), and 62%
(global)
Christopher et al. (2006,155729)
¦1.4
65%
Matsui and Pielke (2006,190495)
¦1.6
30°S-30°N oceans
Quaas et al. (2008, 190916)
¦0.7
¦1.8
¦0.9
45%
Bellouin et al. (2008,189999)
0.021
¦0.6
0.107
¦3.3
0.043
¦1.3
Update to Bellouin et al. (2005)
with M0DIS Collection 5 data
Zhao et al. (2008,190936)
¦1.25
35%
Schulz et al. (2006,190381)
0.022
¦0.59
0.065
¦1.14
0.036
¦0.77
30-40%; same emissions
prescribed for all models
July 2009
9-145
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Ocean
Land
Global
Sources: Schulz et al., (2006,190381) approaches constrained by satellite observations, Kaufman et al. (2005,155891); Bellouin et al. (2005,155684) 2008; Chung et al. (2005,155733); Yu et
al. (2006,156173); Christopher et al. (2006,155729); Matsui and Pielke (2006,190495); Quaas et al. (2008,190916); Zhao et al. (2008,190936).
9.3.3.5. Aerosol-Cloud Interactions and Indirect Forcing
Satellite views of the Earth show a planet whose albedo is dominated by dark
oceans and vegetated surfaces, white clouds, and bright deserts. The bright white
clouds overlying darker oceans or vegetated surface demonstrate the significant effect
that clouds have on the Earth's radiative balance. Low clouds reflect incoming
sunlight back to space, acting to cool the planet, whereas high clouds can trap
outgoing terrestrial radiation and act to warm the planet. In the Arctic, low clouds
have also been shown to warm the surface (Garrett and Zhao, 2006, 190570). Changes
in cloud cover, in cloud vertical development, and cloud optical properties will have
strong radiative and therefore, climatic impacts. Furthermore, factors that change
cloud development will also change precipitation processes. These changes may alter
amounts, locations and intensities of local and regional rain and snowfall, creating
droughts, floods and severe weather.
Cloud droplets form on a subset of aerosol particles called cloud condensation
nuclei (CCN). In general, an increase in aerosol leads to an increase in CCN and an
increase in drop concentration. Thus, for the same amount of liquid water in a cloud,
more available CCN will result in a greater number but smaller size of droplets
(Twomey, 1977, 190533). A cloud with smaller but more numerous droplets will be
brighter and reflect more sunlight to space, thus exerting a cooling effect. This is the
first aerosol indirect radiative effect, or "albedo effect". The effectiveness of a particle
as a CCN depends on its size and composition so that the degree to which clouds
become brighter for a given aerosol perturbation, and therefore the extent of cooling,
depends on the aerosol size distribution and its size "dependent composition. In
addition, aerosol perturbations to cloud microphysics may involve feedbacks; for
example, smaller drops are less likely to collide and coalesce; this will inhibit growth,
suppressing precipitation, and possibly increasing cloud lifetime (Albrecht, 1989,
045783). In this case clouds may exert an even stronger cooling effect.
A distinctly different aerosol effect on clouds exists in thin Arctic clouds (LWP <25
g m-2) having low emissivity. Aerosol has been shown to increase the longwave
emissivity in these clouds, thereby warming the surface (Lubin and Vogelmann, 2006,
190466; Garrett and Zhao, 2006, 190570).
Some aerosol particles, particularly black carbon and dust, also act as ice nuclei
(IN) and in so doing, modify the microphysical properties of mixed-phase and ice-
clouds. An increase in IN will generate more ice crystals, which grow at the expense of
water droplets due to the difference in vapor pressure over ice and water surfaces. The
efficient growth of ice particles may increase the precipitation efficiency. In deep
convective, polluted clouds there is a delay in the onset of freezing because droplets
are smaller. These clouds may eventually precipitate, but only after higher altitudes
are reached that result in taller cloud tops, more lightning and greater chance of
severe weather (Rosenfeld and Lansky, 1998, 190230; Andreae et al., 2004, 155658).
The present state of knowledge of the nature and abundance of IN, and ice formation
in clouds is extremely poor. There is some observational evidence of aerosol influences
on ice processes, but a clear link between aerosol, IN concentrations, ice crystal
concentrations and growth to precipitation has not been established. This report
therefore only peripherally addresses ice processes. More information can be found in
a review by the WMO/IUGG International Aerosol-Precipitation Scientific Assessment
(Levin and Cotton, 2008, 190375).
July 2009
9-146
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
In addition to their roles as CCN and IN, aerosols also absorb and scatter light,
and therefore they can change atmospheric conditions (temperature, stability, and
surface fluxes) that influence cloud development and properties (Ackerman et al.,
2000, 002987; Hansen et al., 1997, 043104). Thus, aerosols affect clouds through
changing cloud droplet size distributions, cloud particle phase, and by changing the
atmospheric environment of the cloud.
9.3.3.6. Remote Sensing of Aerosol-Cloud Interactions and Indirect Forcing
The AVHRR satellite instruments have observed relationships between columnar
aerosol loading, retrieved cloud microphysics, and cloud brightness over the Amazon
Basin that are consistent with the theories explained above (Feingold et al., 2001,
190544; Kaufman and Fraser, 1997, 190958; Kaufman and Nakajima, 1993, 190959).
but do not necessarily prove a causal relationship. Other studies have linked cloud
and aerosol microphysical parameters or cloud albedo and droplet size using satellite
data applied over the entire global oceans (Han et al., 1998, 190594; Nakajima et al.,
2001, 190552; Wetzel and Stowe, 1999, 190636). Using these correlations with
estimates of aerosol increase from the pre-industrial era, estimates of anthropogenic
aerosol indirect radiative forcing fall into the range of "0.7 to "1.7 W/m2 (Nakajima et
al., 2001, 190552).
Introduction of the more modern instruments (POLDER and MODIS) has allowed
more detailed observations of relationships between aerosol and cloud parameters.
Cloud cover can both decrease and increase with increasing aerosol loading (Kaufman
et al., 2005, 155891; Koren et al., 2004, 190187; Koren et al., 2005, 190188; Matheson
et al., 2005, 190494; Sekiguchi et al., 2003, 190385; Yu and et, 2007, 093173). The
same is true of LWP (Han et al., 2002, 049181; Matsui et al., 2006, 190498). Aerosol
absorption appears to be an important factor in determining how cloud cover will
respond to increased aerosol loading (Jiang and Feingold, 2006, 190976; Kaufman and
Koren, 2006, 190951; Koren et al., 2008, 190193). Different responses of cloud cover to
increased aerosol could also be correlated with atmospheric thermodynamic and
moisture structure (Yu and et, 2007, 093173). Observations in the MODIS data show
that aerosol loading correlates with enhanced convection and greater production of ice
anvils in the summer Atlantic Ocean (Koren et al., 2005, 190188). which conflicts with
previous results that used AVHRR and could not isolate convective systems from
shallow clouds (Sekiguchi et al., 2003, 190385).
In recent years, surface-based remote sensing has also been applied to address
aerosol effects on cloud microphysics. This method offers some interesting insights,
and is complementary to the global satellite view. Surface remote sensing can only be
applied at a limited number of locations, and therefore lacks the global satellite view.
However, these surface stations yield high temporal resolution data and because they
sample aerosol below, rather than adjacent to clouds they do not suffer from "cloud
contamination". With the appropriate instrumentation (lidar) they can measure the
local aerosol entering the clouds, rather than a column-integrated aerosol optical
depth. Under well-mixed conditions, surface in situ aerosol measurements can be
used. Surface re mote-sen sing studies are discussed in more detail below, although the
main science issues are common to satellite remote sensing.
Feingold et al. (2001, 190544) used data collected at the ARM Southern Great
Plains (SGP) site to allow simultaneous retrieval of aerosol and cloud properties. A
combination of a Doppler cloud radar and a microwave radiometer was used to
retrieve cloud drop effective radius profiles in non-precipitating (radar reflectivity Z
<-17 dBZ), ice-free clouds. Simultaneously, sub-cloud aerosol extinction profiles were
measured with a lidar to quantify the response of drop sizes to changes in aerosol
properties. Cloud data were binned according to liquid water path (LWP) as measured
with a microwave radiometer, consistent with Twomey's (1977, 190533) conceptual
view of the aerosol impact on cloud microphysics. With high temporal/spatial
resolution data (on the order of 20s or 100s of meters), realizations of aerosol-cloud
July 2009
9-147
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
interactions at the large eddy scale were obtained, and quantified in terms of the
relative decrease in is in response to a relative increase in aerosol extinction (dn
iWcin extinction), as shown in Figure 9-69. Examining the dependence in this way
reduces reliance on absolute measures of cloud and aerosol parameters and minimizes
sensitivity to measurement error, provided errors are unbiased. This formulation
permitted these responses to be related to cloud microphysical theory Restricting the
examination to updrafts only (as determined from the radar Doppler signal) permitted
examination of the role of updraft in determining the response of |i to changes in
aerosol (via changes in drop number concent rat ion Ml). Analysis of data from 7 days
showed that turbulence intensifies the aerosol impact on cloud microphysics.
In addition to radar/microwave radiometer retrievals of aerosol and cloud
properties, measurements of cloud optical depth by surface based radiometers such as
the MFRSR (Michalsky et al., 2001, 190537) have been used in combination with
measurements of cloud I AVI' by microwave radiometer to measure an average value of
during dayhght. when the solar elevation angle is sufficiently high (Min and
Harrison, 1996,190538)., Using this retrieval, Kim et al. (2003, 155899) performed
analyses of the response to changes in aerosol at the same continental site, using a
surface measurement of the aerosol light scattering coefficient instead of using
extinction near cloud base as a proxy for QQN. Variance in LWP was shown to explain
most of the variance in cloud optical depth , exacerbating detection of an aerosol effect.
Although a decrease in w as observed with increasing scattering coefficient, the
relation was not strong, indicative of other influences on re and/or decoupling between
the surface and cloud layer. A similar study was conducted by Garrett et al. (2004,
190568) at a location in the Arctic.
1
i I i i mi i j i i i i ia
April 3 1998
_
: -
IE
¦
0,07
# LWP: 100—110 g
" 0.09
• IWP: 1 10-121 g m'1
0.09
- LWP 121-133 g m"2
J—
.1—1-JLJ.llil 1 J. _I_L_LJ_I_L
0.01 0.10 1.00
Aerosol extinction (km1)
Source: Adapted from Feingold et al. (2003,190551).
Figure 9-69. Scatter plots showing mean cloud drop effective radius (re) vs. aerosol extinction
coefficient (unit: km i) for various liquid water path (LWP) bands on April 3,1998 at ARM
SGP site.
July 2009
9-148
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
They suggested that summertime Arctic clouds are more sensitive to aerosol
perturbations than clouds at lower latitudes. The advantage of the MFRSR/microwave
radiometer combination is that it derives re from cloud optical depth and LWP and it
is not as sensitive to large drops as the radar is. A limitation is that it can be applied
only to clouds with extensive horizontal cover during daylight hours.
More recent data analyses by Feingold et al. (2003, 190551). Kim et al. (2008,
130785) and McComiskey et al. (2008, 190525) at a variety of locations, and modeling
work (Feingold, 2003, 190547) have investigated (i) the use of different proxies for
cloud condensation nuclei, such as the light scattering coefficient and aerosol index!
(ii) sensitivity of cloud microphysical/optical properties to controlling factors such as
aerosol size distribution, entrainment, LWP, and updraft velocity! (iii) the effect of
optical- as opposed to radar-retrievals of drop size! and (iv) spatial heterogeneity.
These studies have reinforced the importance of LWP and vertical velocity as
controlling parameters. They have also begun to reconcile the reasons for the large
discrepancies between various approaches, and platforms (satellite, aircraft in situ,
and surface-based remote sensing). These investigations are important because
satellite measurements that use a similar approach are being employed in GCMs to
represent the albedo indirect effect (Quaas and Boucher, 2005, 190573). In fact, the
weakest albedo indirect effect in IPCC (2007, 189430) derives from satellite
measurements that have very weak responses of n> to changes in aerosol. The
relationship between these aerosol-cloud microphysical responses and cloud radiative
forcing has been examined by McComiskey and Feingold (2008, 190 5 1 7). They
showed that for plane-parallel clouds, a typical uncertainty in the logarithmic
gradient of a /6-aerosol relationship of 0.05 results in a local forcing error of "3 to "10
W/m2, depending on the aerosol perturbation. This sensitivity reinforces the
importance of adequate quantification of aerosol effects on cloud microphysics to
assessment of the radiative forcing, i.e., the indirect effect. Quantification of these
effects from remote sensors is exacerbated by measurement errors. For example, LWP
is measured to an accuracy of 25 g m-2 at best, and since it is the thinnest clouds (i.e.,
low LWP) that are most susceptible (from a radiative forcing perspective) to changes
in aerosol, this measurement uncertainty represents a significant uncertainty in
whether the observed response is related to aerosol, or to differences in LWP. The
accuracy and spatial resolution of satellite "based LWP measurements is much poorer
and this represents a significant challenge. In some cases important measurements
are simply absent, e.g., updraft is not measured from satellite-based remote sensors.
Finally, cloud radar data from CloudSat, along with the A-train aerosol data, is
providing great opportunity for inferring aerosol effects on precipitation (e.g.,
Stephens and Haynes, 2007, 190413). The aerosol effect on precipitation is far more
complex than the albedo effect because the instantaneous view provided by satellites
makes it difficult to establish causal relationships.
9.3.3.7. In Situ Studies of Aerosol-Cloud Interactions
In situ observations of aerosol effects on cloud microphysics date back to the
1950s and 1960s (Gunn and Phillips, 1957, 190595! Squires, 1958, 045608! Warner,
1968, 157114! Warner and Twomey, 1967, 045616! Radke et al., 1989, 156034! Leaitch
et al., 1992, 045270! Brenguier et al., 2000, 189966! to name a few). These studies
showed that high concentrations of CCN from anthropogenic sources, such as
industrial pollution or the burning of sugarcane can increase cloud droplet number
concentration A&, thus increasing cloud microphysical stability and potentially
reducing precipitation efficiency. As in the case of remote sensing studies, the causal
link between aerosol perturbations and cloud microphysical responses (e.g., /& or AS)
is much better established than the relationship between aerosol and changes in cloud
fraction, LWC, and precipitation (see also Levin and Cotton, 2008, 190375).
In situ cloud measurements are usually regarded as "ground truth" for satellite
retrievals but in fact there is considerable uncertainty in measured parameters such
July 2009
9-149
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
liquid water content (LWC), and size distribution, which forms the basis of other
calculations such as drop concentration, re and extinction. It is not uncommon to see
discrepancies in LWC on the order of 50% between different instruments, and cloud
drop size distributions are difficult to measure, particularly for droplets <10 jim where
Mie scattering oscillations generate ambiguities in drop size. Measurement
uncertainty in ib from in situ probes is assessed, for horizontally homogeneous clouds,
to be on the order of 15" 20%, compared to 10% for MODIS and 15-20% for other
spectral measurements (Feingold et al., 2003, 190551). As with remote measurements
it is prudent to consider relative (as opposed to absolute) changes in cloud
microphysics related to relative changes in aerosol. An added consideration is that in
situ measurements typically represent a very small sample of the atmosphere akin to
a thin pencil line through a large volume. For an aircraft flying at 100 m/s and
sampling at 1 Hz, the sample volume is on the order of 10 cm3. The larger spatial
sampling of remote sensing has the advantage of being more representative but it
removes small-scale (i.e., sub sampling volume) variability, and therefore, may
obscure important cloud processes.
Measurements at a wide variety of locations around the world have shown that
increases in aerosol concentration lead to increases in A&. However the rate of this
increase is highly variable and always sub-linear, as exemplified by the compilation of
data in Ramanathan et al. (2001, 042681). This is because, as discussed previously, A&
is a function of numerous parameters in addition to aerosol number concentration,
including size distribution, updraft velocity (Leaitch et al., 1996, 190354). and
composition. In stratocumulus clouds, characterized by relatively low vertical velocity
(and low supersaturation) only a small fraction of particles can be activated whereas
in vigorous cumulus clouds that have high updraft velocities, a much larger fraction of
aerosol particles is activated. Thus the ratio of AS to aerosol particle number
concentration is highly variable.
In recent years there has been a concerted effort to reconcile measured A&
concentrations with those calculated based on observed aerosol size and composition,
as well as updraft velocity. These so-called "closure experiments" have demonstrated
that on average, agreement in A& between these approaches is on the order of 20%
(Conant et al., 2004, 190010). This provides confidence in theoretical understanding of
droplet activation, however, measurement accuracy is not high enough to constrain
the aerosol composition effects that have magnitudes <20%.
One exception to the rule that more aerosol particles result in larger A&is the
case of giant CCN (sizes on the order of a few microns), which, in concentrations on
the order of 1 cm3 (i.e., ~ 1% of the total concentration) can lead to significant
suppression in cloud supersaturation and reductions in A& (O'Dowd et al., 1999,
090414). The measurement of these large particles is difficult and hence the
importance of this effect is hard to assess. These same giant CCN, at concentrations
as low as 1/liter, can significantly affect the initiation of precipitation in moderately
polluted clouds (Johnson, 1982, 190973) and in so doing alter cloud albedo (Feingold et
al., 1999, 190540).
The most direct link between the remote sensing of aerosol-cloud interactions
discussed in Section 9.3.3.6 and in situ observations is via observations of
relationships between drop concentration A& and CCN concentration. Theory shows
that if /fe-CCN relationships are calculated at constant LWP or LWC, their logarithmic
slope is "1/3 that of the A&-CCN logarithmic slope (i.e., dn/fe/dnCCN = "1/3 dnA&/
dnCCN). In general, A&-CCN slopes measured in situ tend to be stronger than
equivalent slopes obtained from remote sensing — particularly in the case of satellite
remote sensing (McComiskey and Feingold, 2008, 190517). There are a number of
reasons for this- (i) in situ measurements focus on smaller spatial scales and are more
likely to observe the droplet activation process as opposed to remote sensing that
incorporates larger spatial scales and includes other processes such as drop
coalescence that reduce A&, and therefore the slope of the A&- CCN relationship
(McComiskey et al., 2008, 190525). (ii) Satellite remote sensing studies typically do
July 2009
9-150
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
not sort their data by LWP, and this has been shown to reduce the magnitude of the
/fe-CCN response (Feingold, 2003, 190547).
In conclusion, observational estimates of aerosol indirect radiative forcings are
still in their infancy. Effects on cloud microphysics that result in cloud brightening
have to be considered along with effects on cloud lifetime, cover, vertical development
and ice production. For in situ measurements, aerosol effects on cloud microphysics
are reasonably consistent (within ~ 20%) with theory but measurement uncertainties
in remote sensing of aerosol effects on clouds, as well as complexity associated with
three-dimensional radiative transfer, result in considerable uncertainty in radiative
forcing. The higher order indirect effects are poorly understood and even the sign of
the microphysical response and forcing may not always be the same. Aerosol type and
specifically the absorption properties of the aerosol may cause different cloud
responses. Early estimates of observationally based aerosol indirect forcing range
from "0.7 to -1.7 W/m2 (Nakajima et al., 2001, 190552) and "0.6 to -1.2 W/m2
(Sekiguchi et al., 2003, 190385). depending on the estimate for aerosol increase from
pre-industrial times and whether aerosol effects on cloud fraction are also included in
the estimate.
9.3.4. Outstanding Issues
Despite substantial progress, as summarized in Sections 9.3.2 and 9.3.3, most
measurement-based studies so far have concentrated on influences produced by the
sum of natural and anthropogenic aerosols on solar radiation under clear sky
conditions. Important issues remain-
¦ Because accurate measurements of aerosol absorption are lacking and land surface
reflection values are uncertain, DRF estimates over land and at the ocean surface are
less well constrained than the estimate of TOA DRF over ocean.
¦ Current estimates of the anthropogenic component of aerosol direct radiative forcing
have large uncertainties, especially over land.
¦ Because there are very few measurements of aerosol absorption vertical distribution,
mainly from aircraft during field campaigns, estimates of direct radiative forcing of
above-cloud aerosols and profiles of atmospheric radiative heating induced by aerosol
absorption are poorly constrained.
¦ There is a need to quantify aerosol impacts on thermal infrared radiation, especially for
dust.
¦ The diurnal cycle of aerosol direct radiative forcing cannot be adequately characterized
with currently available, sun-synchronous, polar orbiting satellite measurements.
¦ Measuring aerosol, cloud, and ambient meteorology contributions to indirect radiative
forcing remains a major challenge.
¦ Long-term aerosol trends and their relationship to observed surface solar radiation
changes are not well understood.
The current status and prospects for these areas are briefly discussed below.
Measuring Aerosol Absorption and Single-Scattering Albedo: Currently,
the accuracy of both in situ and remote sensing aerosol SSA measurements is
generally ± 0.03 at best, which implies that the inferred accuracy of clear sky aerosol
DRF would be larger than 1 W/m2 (see Chapter 1 of the CSSP SAP2.3). Recently
developed photoacoustic (Arnott et al., 1999, 020650) and cavity ring down extinction
cell (Strawa et al., 2002, 190421) techniques for measuring aerosol absorption produce
SSA with improved accuracy over previous methods. However, these methods are still
experimental, and must be deployed on aircraft. Aerosol absorption retrievals from
satellites using the UV"technique have large uncertainties associated with its
sensitivity to the height of the aerosol layer(s) (Torres et al., 2005, 190507). and it is
unclear how the UV results can be extended to visible wavelengths. Views in and out
of sunglint can be used to retrieve total aerosol extinction and scattering, respectively,
thus constraining aerosol absorption over oceans (Kaufman et al., 2002, 190955).
July 2009
9-151
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
However, this technique requires retrievals of aerosol scattering properties, including
the real part of the refractive index, well beyond what has so far been demonstrated
from space. In summary, there is a need to pursue a better understanding of the
uncertainty in SSAfrom both in situ measurements and remote sensing retrievals
and, with this knowledge, to synthesize different data sets to yield a characterization
of aerosol absorption with well-defined uncertainty (Leahy et al., 2007, 190232).
Laboratory studies of aerosol absorption of specific known composition are also needed
to interpret in situ measurements and remote sensing retrievals and to provide
updated database of particle absorbing properties for models.
Estimating the Aerosol Direct Radiative Forcing over Land: Land surface
reflection is large, heterogeneous, and anisotropic, which complicates aerosol
retrievals and DRF determination from satellites. Currently, the aerosol retrievals
over land have relatively lower accuracy than those over ocean (Section 9.3.2.5) and
satellite data are rarely used alone for estimating DRF over land (Section 9.3.3).
Several issues need to be addressed, such as developing appropriate angular models
for aerosols over land (Patadia et al., 2008, 190558) and improving land surface
reflectance characterization. MODIS andMISR measure land surface reflection
wavelength dependence and angular distribution at high resolution (Moody et al.,
2005, 190548; Martonchik et al., 1998, 190484; Martonchik et al., 2002, 190490). This
offers a promising opportunity for inferring the aerosol direct radiative forcing over
land from satellite measurements of radiative fluxes (e.g., CERES) and from critical
reflectance techniques (Fraser and Kaufman, 1985, 190567; Kaufman, 1987, 190960).
The aerosol direct radiative forcing over land depends strongly on aerosol absorption
and improved measurements of aerosol absorption are required.
Distinguishing Anthropogenic from Natural Aerosols: Current estimates
of anthropogenic components of AOD and direct radiative forcing have larger
uncertainties than total aerosol optical depth and direct radiative forcing, particularly
over land (see Section 9.3.3.4), because of relatively large uncertainties in the
retrieved aerosol microphysical properties (see Section 9.3.2). Future measurements
should focus on improved retrievals of such aerosol properties as size distribution,
particle shape, and absorption, along with algorithm refinement for better aerosol
optical depth retrievals. Coordinated in situ measurements offer a promising avenue
for validating and refining satellite identification of anthropogenic aerosols (Anderson
et al., 2005, 189993; 2005, 189991). For satellite-based aerosol type characterization,
it is sometimes assumed that all biomass-burning aerosol is anthropogenic and all
dust aerosol is natural (Kaufman et al., 2005, 155891). The better determination of
anthropogenic aerosols requires a quantification of biomass burning ignited by
lightning (natural origin) and mineral dust due to human induced changes of land
cover/land use and climate (anthropogenic origin). Improved emissions inventories
and better integration of satellite observations with models seem likely to reduce the
uncertainties in aerosol source attribution.
Profiling the Vertical Distributions of Aerosols: Current aerosol profile
data are far from adequate for quantifying the aerosol radiative forcing and
atmospheric response to the forcing. The data have limited spatial and temporal
coverage, even for current spaceborne lidar measurements. Retrieving aerosol
extinction profile from lidar measured attenuated backscatter is subject to large
uncertainties resulting from aerosol type characterization. Current space-borne Lidar
measurements are also not sensitive to aerosol absorption. Because of lack of aerosol
vertical distribution observations, the estimates of DRF in cloudy conditions and dust
DRF in the thermal infrared remain highly uncertain (Schulz et al., 2006, 190381;
Sokolik et al., 2001, 190404; Lubin et al., 2002, 190463). It also remains challenging to
constrain the aerosol-induced atmospheric heating rate increment that is essential for
assessing atmospheric responses to the aerosol radiative forcing (e.g., Yu et al., 2002,
190923; Feingold et al., 2005, 190550; Lau et al., 2006, 190223). Progress in the
foreseeable future is likely to come from (l) better use of existing, global, space-based
backscatter lidar data to constrain model simulations, and (2) deployment of new
instruments, such as high-spectral-resolution lidar (HSRL), capable of retrieving both
July 2009
9-152
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
extinction and backscatter from space. The HSRL lidar system will be deployed on the
EarthCARE satellite mission tentatively scheduled for 2013
(http7/asimov/esrin.esi.it/esaLP/ASESMYNW9SC Lpearthcare_l.html).
Characterizing the Diurnal Cycle of Aerosol Direct Radiative Forcing:
The diurnal variability of aerosol can be large, depending on location and aerosol type
(Smirnov et al., 2002, 190398). especially in wildfire situations, and in places where
boundary layer aerosols hydrate or otherwise change significantly during the day.
This cannot be captured by currently available, sun-synchronous, polar orbiting
satellites. Geostationary satellites provide adequate time resolution (TSI et al., 2002,
190031; Wang et al., 2003, 157106). but lack the information required to characterize
aerosol types. Aerosol type information from low earth orbit satellites can help
improve accuracy of geostationary satellite aerosol retrievals (Costa et al., 2004,
190006; 2004, 192022). For estimating the diurnal cycle of aerosol DRF, additional
efforts are needed to adequately characterize the anisotropy of surface reflection (Yu
et al., 2004, 190926) and daytime variation of clouds.
Studying Aerosol-Cloud Interactions and Indirect Radiative Forcing:
Remote sensing estimates of aerosol indirect forcing are still rare and uncertain.
Improvements are needed for both aerosol characterization and measurements of
cloud properties, precipitation, water vapor, and temperature profiles. Basic processes
still need to be understood on regional and global scales. Remote sensing observations
of aerosol-cloud interactions and aerosol indirect forcing are for the most part based
on simple correlations among variables, from which cause-and-effects cannot be
deduced. One difficulty in inferring aerosol effects on clouds from the observed
relationships is separating aerosol from meteorological effects, as aerosol loading itself
is often correlated with the meteorology. In addition, there are systematic errors and
biases in satellite aerosol retrievals for partly cloud-filled scenes. Stratifying aerosol
and cloud data by liquid water content, a key step in quantifying the albedo (or first)
indirect effect, is usually missing. Future work will need to combine satellite
observations with in situ validation and modeling interpretation. A methodology for
integrating observations (in situ and remote) and models at the range of relevant
temporal/spatial scales is crucial to improve understanding of aerosol indirect effects
and aerosol-cloud interactions.
Quantifying Long-Term Trends of Aerosols at Regional Scales: Because
secular changes are subtle and are superposed on seasonal and other natural
variability, this requires the construction of consistent, multi-decadal records of
climate-quality data. To be meaningful, aerosol trend analysis must be performed on a
regional basis. Long-term trends of aerosol optical depth have been studied using
measurements from surface remote sensing stations (e.g., Hoyt and Frohlich, 1983,
190621; Augustine et al., 2008, 189913; Luo et al., 2001, 190467) and historic satellite
sensors (Massie et al., 2004, 190492; Mishchenko et al., 2007, 190542; Mishchenko
and Geogdzhayev, 2007, 190545; Zhao et al., 2008, 190935). An emerging multiyear
climatology of high quality AOD data from modern satellite sensors (e.g., Remer and
et, 2008, 190224; Kahn RAGaitley et al., 2005, 190966) has been used to examine the
interannual variations of aerosol (e.g., Koren et al., 2007, 190189; Mishchenko and
Geogdzhayev, 2007, 190545) and contribute significantly to the study of aerosol
trends. Current observational capability needs to be continued to avoid any data gaps.
A synergy of aerosol products from historical, modern and future sensors is needed to
construct as long a record as possible. Such a data synergy can build upon
understanding and reconciliation of AOD differences among different sensors or
platforms (Jeong et al., 2005, 190977). This requires overlapping data records for
multiple sensors. A close examination of relevant issues associated with individual
sensors is urgently needed, including sensor calibration, algorithm assumptions, cloud
screening, data sampling and aggregation, among others.
Linking Aerosol Long-Term Trends with Changes of Surface Solar
Radiation: Anaiy sis of the long-term surface solar radiation record suggests
significant trends during past decades (e.g., Stanhill and Cohen, 2001, 042121; Wild et
July 2009
9-153
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
al., 2005, 156156; Pinker et al., 2005, 190569; Alpert et al., 2005, 190047). Although a
significant and widespread decline in surface total solar radiation (the sum of direct
and diffuse irradiance) occurred up to 1990 (so-called solar dimming), a sustained
increase has been observed during the subsequent decade. Speculation suggests that
such trends result from decadal changes of aerosols and the interplay of aerosol direct
and indirect radiative forcing (Stanhill and Cohen, 2001, 042121; Wild et al., 2005,
156156; Streets et al., 2006, 190425; Norris and Wild, 2007, 190555; Ruckstuhl and et,
2008, 190356). However, reliable observations of aerosol trends are required test these
ideas. In addition to aerosol optical depth, changes in aerosol composition must also
be quantified, to account for changing industrial practices, environmental regulations,
and biomass burning emissions (Novakov et al., 2003, 048398; Streets et al., 2004,
190423; Streets and Aunan, 2005, 156106). Such compositional changes will affect the
aerosol SSAand size distribution, which in turn will affect the surface solar radiation
(e.g., Qian et al., 2007, 190572). However such data are currently rare and subject to
large uncertainties. Finally, a better understanding of aerosol-radiation-cloud
interactions and trends in cloudiness, cloud albedo, and surface albedo is badly needed
to attribute the observed radiation changes to aerosol changes with less ambiguity.
9.3.5. Concluding Remarks
Since the concept of aerosol-radiation-climate interactions was first proposed
around 1970, substantial progress has been made in determining the mechanisms and
magnitudes of these interactions, particularly in the last 10 yr. Such progress has
greatly benefited from significant improvements in aerosol measurements and
increasing sophistication of model simulations. As a result, knowledge of aerosol
properties and their interaction with solar radiation on regional and global scales is
much improved. Such progress plays a unique role in the definitive assessment of the
global anthropogenic radiative forcing, as "virtually certainly positive" in IPCC AR4
(Haywood and Schulz, 2007, 190600).
In Situ Measurements of Aerosols: New in situ instruments such as aerosol
mass spectrometers, photoacoustic techniques, and cavity ring down cells provide high
accuracy and fast time resolution measurements of aerosol chemical and optical
properties. Numerous focused field campaigns and the emerging ground-based aerosol
networks are improving regional aerosol chemical, microphysical, and radiative
property characterization. Aerosol closure studies of different measurements indicate
that measurements of submicrometer, spherical sulfate and carbonaceous particles
have a much better accuracy than that for dust-dominated aerosol. The accumulated
comprehensive data sets of regional aerosol properties provide a rigorous "test bed"
and strong constraint for satellite retrievals and model simulations of aerosols and
their direct radiative forcing.
Remote Sensing Measurements of Aerosols: Surface networks, covering
various aerosol regimes around the globe, have been measuring aerosol optical depth
with an accuracy of 0.01-0.02, which is adequate for achieving the accuracy of 1 W/m2
for cloud-free TOADRF. On the other hand, aerosol microphysical properties retrieved
from these networks, especially SSA, have relatively large uncertainties and are only
available in very limited conditions. Current satellite sensors can measure AOD with
an accuracy of about 0.05 or 15-20% in most cases. The implementation of multi-
wavelength, multi-angle, and polarization measuring capabilities has also made it
possible to measure particle properties (size, shape, and absorption) that are essential
for characterizing aerosol type and estimating anthropogenic component of aerosols.
However, these microphysical measurements are more uncertain than AOD
measurements.
Observational Estimates of Clear-Sky Aerosol Direct Radiative
Forcing: Closure studies based on focused field experiments reveal DRF
uncertainties of about 25% for sulfate/carbonaceous aerosol and 60% for dust at
July 2009
9-154
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
regional scales. The high-accuracy of MODIS, MISR and POLDER aerosol products
and broadband flux measurements from CERES make it feasible to obtain
observational constraints for aerosol TOA DRF at a global scale, with relaxed
requirements for measuring particle microphysical properties. Major conclusions from
the assessment are-
¦ A number of satellite-based approaches consistently estimate the clear-sky diurnally
averaged TOA DRF (on solar radiation) to be about "5.5 ± 0.2 W/m2 (mean ± standard
error from various methods) over global ocean. At the ocean surface, the diurnally
averaged DRF is estimated to be "8.7 ± 0.7 W/m2. These values are calculated for the
difference between today's measured total aerosol (natural plus anthropogenic) and the
absence of all aerosol.
¦ Overall, in comparison to that over ocean, the DRF estimates over land are more poorly
constrained by observations and have larger uncertainties. A few satellite retrieval and
satellite-model integration yield the overland clear-sky diurnally averaged DRF of "4.9
± 0.7 W/m2 and -11.8 ± 1.9 W/m2 at the TOA and surface, respectively. These values
over land are calculated for the difference between total aerosol and the complete
absence of all aerosol.
¦ Use of satellite measurements of aerosol microphysical properties yields that on a
global ocean average, about 20% of AOD is contributed by human activities and the
clear-sky TOA DRF by anthropogenic aerosols is -1.1 ± 0.4 W/m2. Similar DRF
estimates are rare over land, but a few measurement-model integrated studies do
suggest much more negative DRF over land than over ocean.
¦ These satellite "based DRF estimates are much greater than the model-based estimates,
with differences much larger at regional scales than at a global scale.
Measurements of Aerosol-Cloud Interactions and Indirect Radiative
Forcing: In situ measurement of cloud properties and aerosol effects on cloud
microphysics suggest that theoretical understanding of the activation process for
water cloud is reasonably well-understood. Remote sensing of aerosol effects on
droplet size associated with the albedo effect tends to underestimate the magnitude of
the response compared to in situ measurements. Recent efforts trace this to a
combination of lack of stratification of data by cloud water, the relatively large spatial
scale over which measurements are averaged (which includes variability in cloud
fields, and processes that obscure the aerosol-cloud processes), as well as
measurement uncertainties (particularly in broken cloud fields). It remains a major
challenge to infer aerosol number concentrations from satellite measurements. The
present state of knowledge of the nature and abundance of IN, and ice formation in
clouds is extremely poor.
Despite the substantial progress in recent decades, several important issues
remain, such as measurements of aerosol size distribution, particle shape, absorption,
and vertical profiles, and the detection of aerosol long-term trend and establishment
of its connection with the observed trends of solar radiation reaching the surface, as
discussed in Section 9.3.4. Furthering the understanding of aerosol impacts on climate
requires a coordinated research strategy to improve the measurement accuracy and
use the measurements to validate and effectively constrain model simulations.
Concepts of future research in measurements are discussed in Chapter 4 "Way
Forward" (of the CCSP SAP2.3).
9.3.6. Modeling the Effect of Aerosols on Climate
9.3.6.1. Introduction
The IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) (Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate, 2007, 190988) concludes that man's influence on the warming climate is in
the category of "very likely". This conclusion is based on, among other things, the
July 2009 9-155 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
ability of models to simulate the global and, to some extent, regional variations of
temperature over the past 50-100 yr. When anthropogenic effects are included, the
simulations can reproduce the observed warming (primarily for the past 50 yr); when
they are not, the models do not get very much warming at all. In fact, all of the models
runs for the IPCC AIM assessment (more than 20) produce this distinctive result,
driven by the greenhouse gas increases that have been observed to occur.
These results were produced in models whose average global warming associated
with a doubled C02 forcing of 4 W/m2 was about 3°C. This translates into a climate
sensitivity (surface temperature change per forcing) of about 0.75°C/(W/m2). The
determination of climate sensitivity is crucial to projecting the future impact of
increased greenhouse gases, and the credibility of this projected value relies on the
ability of these models to simulate the observed temperature changes over the past
century. However, in producing the observed temperature trend in the past, the
models made use of very uncertain aerosol forcing. The greenhouse gas change by
itself produces warming in models that exceeds that observed by some 40% on average
(IPCC et al., 2007, 189430! IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate, 2007,
190988). Cooling associated with aerosols reduces this warming to the observed level.
Different climate models use differing aerosol forcings, both direct (aerosol scattering
and absorption of short and longwave radiation) and indirect (aerosol effect on cloud
cover reflectivity and lifetime), whose magnitudes vary markedly from one model to
the next. Kiehl (2007, 190949) using nine of the IPCC (2007, 189430; 2007, 190988)
AE.4 climate models found that they had a factor of three forcing differences in the
aerosol contribution for the 20th century. The differing aerosol forcing is the prime
reason why models whose climate sensitivity varies by almost a factor of three can
produce the observed trend. It was thus concluded that the uncertainty in IPCC
(2007, 190988) anthropogenic climate simulations for the past century should really
be much greater than stated (Schwartz et al., 2007, 188938; Kerr, 2007, 190950).
since, in general, models with low/high sensitivity to greenhouse warming used
weaker/stronger aerosol cooling to obtain the same temperature response (Kiehl,
2007, 190949). Had the situation been reversed and the low/high sensitivity models
used strong/ weak aerosol forcing, there would have been a greater divergence in
model simulations of the past century.
July 2009
9-156
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Figure 9-70. Sampling the Arcic Haze. Pollution and smoke aerosols can travel long distances, from
mid-latitudes to the Arctic, causing "Arctic Haze." Photo taken from the NASA DC-8
aircraft during the ARCTAS field experiment over Alaska in April 2008. Credit: Mian
Chin, NASA.
Therefore, the fact that a model has accurately reproduced the global
temperature change in the past does not imply that its future forecast is accurate.
This state of affairs will remain until a firmer estimate of radiative forcing (RF) by
aerosols, in addition to that by greenhouse gases, is available.
Two different approaches are used to assess the aerosol effect on climate,
"Forward modeling" studies incorporate different aerosol types and attempt to
explicitly Calculate the. aerosol RE, From this approach, IPCC (2007, 190988)
concluded that the best estimate of the global aerosol direct RF (compared with
preindustrial times) is -0,5 (-0.9 to -0.1) W/m2. The RF due to the cloud albedo or
brightness effect (also referred to as first indirect or Twomey effect) is estimated to be
-0.7 (-1.8 to -0,3) W/m2. Mo estimate was specified for the effect associated with cloud
lifetime. The total negative RF due to aerosols according to IPOG (2007, 190988)
estimates is then -1.3 (-2.2 to -0,5) W/m2. In comparison, the positive radiative: forcing
(RF) from greenhouse gases (including tropospheric ozone) is estimated to be +2.9 ±
0.3 W/m2; hence tropospheric aerosols reduce the influence: from greenhouse gases by
about 45% (15-85%). This approach however inherits large uncertainties in aerosol
amount, composition, and physical and optical properties in modeling of atmospheric
aerosols. The consequences of these uncertainties are discussed in the next section.
July 2009
9-157
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
The other method of calculating aerosol forcing is called the "inverse approach" —
it is assumed that the observed climate change is primarily the result of the known
climate forcing contributions. If one further assumes a particular climate sensitivity
(or a range of sensitivities), one can determine what the total forcing had to be to
produce the observed temperature change. The aerosol forcing is then deduced as a
residual after subtraction of the greenhouse gas forcing along with other known
forcings from the total value. Studies of this nature come up with aerosol forcing
ranges of "0.6 to -1.7 W/m2 (Knutti et al., 2002, 190178; Knutti et al., 2003, 190180);
IPCC AR.4 Chap.9); -0.4 to -1.6 W/m2 (Gregory et al., 2002, 190593); and -0.4 to -1.4
W/m2 (Stott, 2006, 190419). This approach however provides a bracket of the possible
range of aerosol forcing without the assessment of current knowledge of the
complexity of atmospheric aerosols.
This chapter of the CCSP SAP2.3 reviews the current state of aerosol RF in the
global models and assesses the uncertainties in these calculations. First
representation of aerosols in the forward global chemistry and transport models and
the diversity of the model simulated aerosol fields are discussed; then calculation of
the aerosol direct and indirect effects in the climate models is reviewed; finally the
impacts of aerosols on climate model simulations and their implications are assessed.
9.3.6.2. Modeling of Atmospheric Aerosols
The global aerosol modeling capability has developed rapidly in the past decade.
In the late 1990s, there were only a few global models that were able to simulate one
or two aerosol components, but now there are a few dozen global models that simulate
a comprehensive suite of aerosols in the atmosphere. As introduced in Chapter 1 (of
the CCSP SAP2.3), aerosols consist of a variety of species including dust, sea salt,
sulfate, nitrate, and carbonaceous aerosols (black and organic carbon) produced from
natural and man-made sources with a wide range of physical and optical properties.
Because of the complexity of the processes and composition, and highly
inhomogeneous distribution of aerosols, accurately modeling atmospheric aerosols and
their effects remains a challenge. Models have to take into account not only the
aerosol and precursor emissions, but also the chemical transformation, transport, and
removal processes (e.g., dry and wet depositions) to simulate the aerosol mass
concentrations. Furthermore, aerosol particle size can grow in the atmosphere
because the ambient water vapor can condense on the aerosol particles. This
"swelling" process, called hygroscopic growth, is most commonly parameterized in the
models as a function of relative humidity.
Estimates of Emissions. Aerosols have various sources from both natural and
anthropogenic processes. Natural emissions include wind-blown mineral dust, aerosol
and precursor gases from volcanic eruptions, natural wild fires, vegetation, and
oceans. Anthropogenic sources include emissions from fossil fuel and biofuel
combustion, industrial processes, agriculture practices, and human "induced biomass
burning.
Following earlier attempts to quantify manmade primary emissions of aerosols
(Turco et al., 1983, 190529; Penner et al., 1993, 045457) systematic work was
undertaken in the late 1990s to calculate emissions of black carbon (BC) and organic
carbon (OC), using fuel-use data and measured emission factors (Liousse et al., 1996,
078158; Cooke and Wilson, , 190046; Cooke et al., 1999, 156365). The work was
extended in greater detail and with improved attention to source-specific emission
factors in Bond et al. (2004, 056389). which provides global inventories of BC and OC
for the year 1996, with regional and source-category discrimination that includes
contributions from industrial, transportation, residential solid-fuel combustion,
vegetation and open biomass burning (forest fires, agricultural waste burning, etc.),
and diesel vehicles.
July 2009
9-158
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Emissions from natural sources—which include wind-blown mineral dust,
wildfires, sea salt, and volcanic eruptions—are less well quantified, mainly because of
the difficulties of measuring emission rates in the field and the unpredictable nature
of the events. Often, emissions must be inferred from ambient observations at some
distance from the actual source. As an example, it was concluded (Lewis and
Schwartz, 2004, 192023) that available information on size-dependent sea salt
production rates could only provide order-of-magnitude estimates. The natural
emissions in general can vary dramatically over space and time.
Aerosols can be produced from trace gases in the atmospheric via chemical
reactions, and those aerosols are called secondary aerosols, as distinct from primary
aerosols that are directly emitted to the atmosphere as aerosol particles. For example,
most sulfate and nitrate aerosols are secondary aerosols that are formed from their
precursor gases, sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NO and N02, collectively
called NOx), respectively. Those sources have been studied for many years and are
relatively well known. By contrast, the sources of secondary organic aerosols (SOA)
are poorly understood, including emissions of their precursor gases (called volatile
organic compounds, VOC) from both natural and anthropogenic sources and the
atmospheric production processes.
Globally, sea salt and mineral dust dominate the total aerosol mass emissions
because of the large source areas and/or large particle sizes. However, sea salt and
dust also have shorter atmospheric lifetimes because of their large particle size, and
are radiatively less active than aerosols with small particle size, such as sulfate,
nitrate, BC, and particulate organic matter (POM, which includes both carbon and
non-carbon mass in the organic aerosol), most of which are anthropogenic in origin.
Because the anthropogenic aerosol RF is usually evaluated (e.g., by the IPCC) as
the anthropogenic perturbation since the pre-industrial period, it is necessary to
estimate the historical emission trends, especially the emissions in the pre-industrial
era. Compared to estimates of present-day emissions, estimates of historical emission
have much larger uncertainties. Information for past years on the source types and
strengths and even locations are difficult to obtain, so historical inventories from
preindustrial times to the present have to be based on limited knowledge and data.
Several studies on historical emission inventories of BC and OC (e.g., Novakov et al.,
2003, 048398; Ito and Penne, 2005, 190626; Bond et al., 2007, 190050; Fernandes et
al., 2007, 190554; Junker and Liousse, 2008, 190971). SO2 (Stern, 2005, 190416). and
various species (Van Aardenne et al., 2001, 055564; Dentener et al., 2006, 088434) are
available in the literature; there are some similarities and some differences among
them, but the emission estimates for early times do not have the rigor of the studies
for present-day emissions. One major conclusion from all these studies is that the
growth of primary aerosol emissions in the 20th century was not nearly as rapid as
the growth in CO2 emissions. This is because in the late 19th and early 20th
centuries, particle emissions such as BC and POM were relatively high due to the
heavy use of biofuels and the lack of particulate controls on coal-burning facilities;
however, as economic development continued, traditional biofuel use remained fairly
constant and particulate emissions from coal burning were reduced by the application
of technological controls (Bond et al., 2007, 190050). Thus, particle emissions in the
20th century did not grow as fast as CO2 emissions, as the latter are roughly
proportional to total fuel use—oil and gas included. Another challenge is estimating
historical biomass burning emissions. A recent study suggested about a 40% increase
in carbon emissions from biomass burning from the beginning to the end of last
century (Mouillot et al., 2006, 190549). but it is difficult to verify.
July 2009
9-159
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table 9-11. Anthropogenic emissions of aerosols and precursors for 2000 and 1750.
Source
Species*
Emission*
Emission 1750
2000 (Tg/yr)
(Tg/yr)
Biomass burning
BC
3.1
1.03
POM
34.7
12.8
S
4.1
1.46
Biofuel
BC
9.1
0.39
POM
9.6
1.56
S
0.12
Fossil fuel
BC
3.0
POM
3.2
S
98.9
# Data source for 2000 emission: biomass burning - Global Fire Emission Dataset (GFED); biofuel BC and POM - Speciated Pollutant Emission Wizard (SPEW); biofuel sulfur - International Institute
for Applied System Analysis (NASA); fossil fuel BC and POM - SPEW; fossil fuel sulfur - Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR) and NASA. Fossil fuel emission of sulfur (S) is
the sum of emission from industry, power plants, and transportation listed in Dentener et al. (2006, 088434).
" S = sulfur, including SO2 and particulate S042". Most emitted as SO2, and 2.5% emitted as S042".
Source: Adapted from Dentener et al. (2006, 088434).
As an example, Table 9"11 shows estimated anthropogenic emissions of sulfur, BC
and POM in the present day (year 2000) and pre "industrial time (1750) compiled by
Dentener et al. (2006, 088434) These estimates have been used in the Aerosol
Comparisons between Observations and Models (AeroCom) project (Experiment B,
which uses the year 2000 emission! and Experiment PRE, which uses pre "industrial
emissions), for simulating atmospheric aerosols and anthropogenic aerosol RF. The
AeroCom results are discussed below and in Section 9.3.6.3.
Aerosol Mass Loading and Optical Depth. In the global models, aerosols are
usually simulated in the successive steps of sources (emission and chemical
formation), transport (from source location to other area), and removal processes (dry
deposition, in which particles fall onto the surface, and wet deposition by rain) that
control the aerosol lifetime. Collectively, emission, transport, and removal determine
the amount (mass) of aerosols in the atmosphere. Aerosol optical depth (AOD), which
is a measure of solar or thermal radiation being attenuated by aerosol particles via
scattering or absorption, can be related to the atmospheric aerosol mass loading as
follows-
AOD = MEE • M
Equation 9-3
where M is the aerosol mass loading per unit area (g m-2), MEE is the mass
extinction efficiency or specific extinction in unit of m2/g, which is
MEE = 3Qest «J
47rpreff
Equation 9-4
where Qex£ is the extinction coefficient (a function of particle size distribution and
refractive index), reff is the aerosol particle effective radius, p is the aerosol particle
density, and f is the ratio of ambient aerosol mass (wet) to dry aerosol mass M. Here,
M is the result from model-simulated atmospheric processes and MEE embodies the
aerosol physical (including microphysical) and optical properties. Since Qex^varies
July 2009
9-160
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
with radiation wavelength, so do MEE and AOD. AOD is the quantity that is most
commonly obtained from remote sensing measurements and is frequently used for
model evaluation (see Chapter 2 of the CCSP SAP2.3). AOD is also a key parameter
determining aerosol radiative effects.
Here the results from the recent multiple global" model studies by the AeroCom
project are summarized, as they represent the current assessment of model-simulated
atmospheric aerosol loading, optical properties, and RF for the present-day. AeroCom
aims to document differences in global aerosol models and com pare the model output
to observations. Sixteen global models participated in the AeroCom Experiment A
(AeroCom-A), for which every model used their own configuration, including their own
choice of estimating emissions (Kinne et al., 2006, 155903; Textor et al., 2006,
190456). Five major aerosol types' sulfate, BC, POM, dust, and sea salt, were included
in the experiments, although some models had additional aerosol species. Of those
major aerosol types, dust and sea-salt are predominantly natural in origin, whereas
sulfate, BC, and POM have major anthropogenic sources.
Table 9"12 summarizes the model results from the AeroCom-A for several key
parameters' Sources (emission and chemical transformation), mass loading, lifetime,
removal rates, and MEE and AOD at a commonly used, mid-visible, wavelength of 550
nanometer (nm). These are the globally averaged values for the year 2000. Major
features and conclusions are'
¦ Globally, aerosol source (in mass) is dominated by sea salt, followed by dust, sulfate,
POM, and BC. Over the non-desert land area, human activity is the major source of
sulfate, black carbon, and organic aerosols.
¦ Aerosols are removed from the atmosphere by wet and dry deposition. Although sea
salt dominates the emissions, it is quickly removed from the atmosphere because of its
large particle size and near-surface distributions, thus having the shortest lifetime.
The median lifetime of sea salt from the AeroCom-A models is less than half a day,
whereas dust and sulfate have similar lifetimes of 4 days and BC and POM 6"7 days.
¦ Globally, small-particle-sized sulfate, BC, and POM make up a little over 10% of total
aerosol mass in the atmosphere. However, they are mainly from anthropogenic
activity, so the highest concentrations are in the most populated regions, where their
effects on climate and air quality are major concerns.
¦ Sulfate and BC have their highest MEE at mid-visible wavelengths, whereas dust is
lowest among the aerosol types modeled. That means for the same amount of aerosol
mass, sulfate and BC are more effective at attenuating (scattering or absorbing) solar
radiation than dust. This is why the sulfate AOD is about the same as dust AOD even
though the atmospheric amount of sulfate mass is 10 times less than that of the dust.
¦ There are large differences, or diversities, among the models for all the parameters
listed in Table 9"12. The largest model diversity, shown as the % standard deviation
from the all-model-mean and the range (minimum and maximum values) in Table 9"12,
is in sea salt emission and removal; this is mainly associated with the differences in
particle size range and source parameterizations in each model. The diversity of sea
salt atmospheric loading however is much smaller than that of sources or sinks,
because the largest particles have the shortest lifetimes even though they comprise the
largest fraction of emitted and deposited mass.
Table 9-12. Summary of statistics of AeroCom Experiment A results from 16 global models.
Quantity
Mean
Median
Range
Stddev/mean*
SOURCES (TG/YR!
SO42-
179
186
98-232
22%
BC
11.9
11.3
7.8-19.4
23%
Organic matter
96.6
96.0
53-138
26%
Dust
1840
1640
672-4040
49%
July 2009
9-161
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Quantity
Mean
Median
Range
Stddev/mean*
Sea salt
16600
6280
2180-121000
199%
REMOVAL RATE (DAYJ
S042-
0.25
0.24
0.19-0.39
18%
BC
0.15
0.15
0.066-0.19
21%
Organic matter
0.16
0.16
0.09-0.23
24%
Dust
0.31
0.25
0.14-0.79
62%
Sea salt
5.07
2.50
0.95-35.0
188%
LIFETIME (DAY)
S042-
4.12
4.13
2.6-5.4
18%
BC
7.12
6.54
5.3-15
33%
Organic matter
6.54
6.16
4.3-11
27%
Dust
4.14
4.04
1.3-7.0
43%
Sea salt
0.48
0.41
0.03-1.1
58%
MASS LOADING (TG)
S042-
1.99
1.98
0.92-2.70
25%
BC
0.24
0.21
0.046-0.51
42%
Organic matter
1.70
1.76
0.46-2.56
27%
Dust
19.2
20.5
4.5-29.5
40%
Sea salt
7.52
6.37
2.5-13.2
54%
MEE AT550 NM (HfG'l
S042-
11.3
9.5
4.2-28.3
56%
BC
9.4
9.2
5.3-18.9
36%
Organic matter
5.7
5.7
3.7-9.1
26%
Dust
0.99
0.95
0.46-2.05
45%
Sea salt
3.0
3.1
0.97-7.5
55%
AOD AT550 NM
S042-
0.035
0.034
0.015-0.051
33%
BC
0.004
0.004
0.002-0.009
46%
Organic matter
0.018
0.019
0.006-0.030
36%
Dust
0.032
0.033
0.012-0.054
44%
Sea salt
0.033
0.030
0.02-0.067
42%
TOTAL AOT AT550 NM
0.124
0.127
0.0560.151
18%
* Stddev/mean was used as the term "diversity" in Textor et al. (2006,190456).
Source: Textor et al. (2006,190456) and Kinne et al. (2006,155903), and AeroCom website http:llnansen.ipsl.iussieu.fr/AEROCOMIdata.html
¦ Among the key parameters compared in Table 9"12, the models agree best for
simulated total AOD — the % of standard deviation from the model mean is 18%, with
the extreme values just a factor of 2 apart. The median value of the multi-model
simulated global annual mean total AOD, 0.127, is also in agreement with the global
mean values from recent satellite measurements. However, despite the general
agreement in total AOD, there are significant diversities at the individual component
level for aerosol optical thickness, mass loading, and mass extinction efficiency. This
indicates that uncertainties in assessing aerosol climate forcing are still large, and they
depend not only on total AOD but also on aerosol absorption and scattering direction
(called asymmetry factor), both of which are determined by aerosol physical and optical
July 2009
9-162
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
properties. In addition, even with large differences in mass loading and MEE among
different models, these terms could compensate for each other (Equation 9-1) to
produce similar AOD. This is illustrated in Figure 9-71. For example, model LO and LS
have quite different mass loading (44 and 74 mg m-2, respectively), especially for dust
and sea salt amount, but they produce nearly identical total AOD (0.127 and 0.128,
respectively).
¦ Because of the large spatial and temporal variations of aerosol distributions, regional
and seasonal diversities are even larger than the diversity for global annual means.
To further isolate the impact of the differences in emissions on the diversity of
simulated aerosol mass loading, identical emissions for aerosols and their precursor
were used in the AeroCom Experiment B exercise in which 12 of the 16 AeroConrA
models participated (Textor and et, 2007, 190458). The comparison of the results and
diversity between AeroConrA and —B for the same models showed that using
harmonized emissions does not significantly reduce model diversity for the simulated
global mass and AOD fields, indicating that the differences in atmospheric processes,
such as transport, removal, chemistry, and aerosol microphysics, play more important
roles than emission in creating diversity among the models. This outcome is
somewhat different from another recent study, in which the differences in calculated
clear-sky aerosol RF between two models (a regional model STEM and a global model
MOZART) were attributed mostly to the differences in emissions (Bates et al., 2006,
189912). although the conclusion was based on only two model simulations for a few
focused regions. It is highly recommended from the outcome of AeroCom "A and "B
that, although more detailed evaluation for each individual process is needed, multi-
model ensemble results, e.g., median values of multi-model output variables, should
be used to estimate aerosol RF, due to their greater robustness, relative to individual
models, when compared to observations (Textor et al., 2006, 190456) Textor and et,
2007, 190458; Schulz et al., 2006, 190381).
9.3.6.3. Calculating Aerosol Direct Radiative Forcing
The three parameters that define the aerosol direct RF are the AOD, the single
scattering albedo (SSA), and the asymmetry factor (g), all of which are wavelength
dependent. AOD is indicative of how much aerosol exists in the column, SSA is the
fraction of radiation being scattered versus the total attenuation (scattered and
absorbed), and the g relates to the direction of scattering that is related to the size of
the particles (see Chapter 1 of the CCSP SAP2.3). An indication of the particle size is
provided by another parameter, the Angstrom exponent (A), which is a measure of
differences of AOD at different wavelengths. For typical tropospheric aerosols, A tends
to be inversely dependent on particle size! larger values of A are generally associated
with smaller aerosols particles. These parameters are further related; for example, for
a given composition, the ability of a particle to scatter radiation decreases more
rapidly with decreasing size than does its ability to absorb, so at a given wavelength
varying A can change SSA. Note that AOD, SSA, g, A, and all the other parameters in
Equations 9.1 and 9.2 vary with space and time due to variations of both aerosol
composition and relative humidity, which influence these characteristics.
July 2009
9-163
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
s
w
c
a
iJ
- pi ku
LO UL 3P«T Ml EH NF QtQG IM OMGO Gl TM
MODEL
A19 £'
a
-a
a
a
i
m
£
*5
VJ
c
lu
I
1 QC»
fl(»
80
TO
GO
50
40
30
20
10
ft
m
I. 1, ,
¦ ¦ i ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ «i
U3 LS UL 3P C" Ml EH NF OT OG EM CMCG G| TM
MODEL
5
35
DO
•PQJV
•3a
¦su
Source: Kinne et al. (2006,155903)
Figure 9-71. Global annual averaged AOD (upper panel) and aerosol mass loading (lower panel) with
their components simulated by 15 models in AeroCom- A (excluding one model which
only reported mass). SU=S0*'~, BC=black carbon, POM=particulate OC, DU=dust,
SS=sea salt. Model abbreviations: L0 = L0A (Lille, Fra), LS=LSCE (Paris, Fra), UL=ULAQ
(L'Aquila, Ita), SP=SPRINTARS (Kyushu, Jap), CT=ARQM (Toronto, Can), MI=MIRAGE
(Richland, USA), EH=ECHAM5 (MPI Hamburg, Ger), NF=CCM Match (NCAR Boulder,
USA), 0T=0slo-CTM (Oslo, Nor), 0G=0LS0-GCM (Oslo, Nor) (prescribed background for
DU and SS], IM=IMPACT (Michigan, USA), GM=GFDLMozart (Princeton, NJ, USA),
G0=G0CART (NASA-GSFC, Washington DC, USA), GI=GISS (NASA-GISS, New York,
USA), TM=TM5 (Utrecht, Net). Also shown in the upper panel are the averaged
observation data from AERONET (Ae) and the satellite composite (S*).
In the recent AeroCom project. aerosol direct RF for the solar spectral
wavelengths (or shortwave) was assessed based on the 9 models that participated in
both Experiment B and PEE in which identical, prescribed emissions for present (year
2000) and predndustrial time (year 1750) listed in Table 9-11 were used across the
models (Schulz et al., 2006:, 190381). The anthropogenic direct RF was obtained by
subtracting Aero- Com-PRE from AeroCom-B simulated results. Because dust and sea
salt are predominantly from natural sources, they were not included in the
anthropogenic RF assessment although the land use practice can contribute to dust
emissions as "anthropogenic". Other aerosols that were not considered in the AeroCom
forcing assessment were natural sulfate (e.g., from volcanoes or ocean) and POM (e.g.,
from biogenic hydrocarbon oxidation), as well as nitrate. The aerosol direct forcing in
July 2009
9-164
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
the AeroCom assessment thus comprises three major anthropogenic aerosol
components sulfate, BC, and POM.
Table 9-13. S042~ mass loading, MEE and AOD at 550 nm, shortwave radiative forcing at the top of the
atmosphere, and normalized forcing with respect to AOD and mass. All values refer to
anthropogenic perturbation.
Model
Mass load MEE
(mg m2) (m2g')
AOD att
550 nm
TOA Forcing
(W/m2)
Forcing/AOD
(W/m2)
Forcing/Mass
(W g1)
PUBLISHED SINCE IPCC 2001
ACCM3
2.23
¦0.56
¦251
B GEOSCHEM
1.53 11.8
0.018
¦0.33
¦18
¦216
C GISS
3.30 6.7
0.022
¦0.65
¦30
¦197
DGISS
3.27
¦0.96
¦294
E GISS*
2.12
¦0.57
¦269
F SPRINTARS
1.55 9.7
0.015
¦0.21
¦135
GLMD
2.76
¦0.42
¦152
HLOA
3.03 9.9
0.03
¦0.41
¦14
¦135
IGATORG
3.06
¦0.32
¦105
JPNNL
5.50 7.6
0.042
¦0.44
¦10
¦80
K UIO-CTM
1.79 10.6
0.019
¦0.37
¦19
¦207
L UIO-GCM
2.28
¦0.29
¦127
AEROCOM: IDENTICAL EMISSIONS USED FOR YR 2000 AND 1750
MUMI 2.64 7.6
0.02
¦0.58
¦29
¦220
N UIO-CTM 1.70 11.2
0.019
¦0.36
¦19
¦212
0 LOA 3.64 9.6
0.035
¦0.49
¦14
¦135
PLSCE 3.01 7.6
0.023
¦0.42
¦18
¦140
Q ECHAMS-HAM 2.47 6.5
0.016
¦0.46
¦29
¦186
R GISS** 1.34 4.5
0.006
¦0.19
¦32
¦142
S UIO-GCM 1.72 7.0
0.012
¦0.25
¦21
¦145
T SPRINTARS 1.19 10.9
0.013
¦0.16
¦12
¦134
UULAQ 1.62 12.3
0.02
¦0.22
¦11
¦136
Average A-L 2.70 9.4
0.024
¦00.46
¦18
¦181
Average M-U 2.15 8.6
0.018
¦0.35
¦21
¦161
Minimum A-U 1.19 4.5
0.006
¦0.96
¦32
¦294
Maximum A-U 5.50 12.3
0.042
¦0.16
¦10
¦80
Std devA-L 1.09 1.9
0.010
0.202
7
68
StddevM-U 0.83 2.6
0.008
0.149
8
35
%Stddev/avg A-L 40% 20%
41%
44%
38%
385
%Stddev/avg M-U 39% 30%
45%
43%
37%
22%
July 2009
9-165
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Mass load MEE AODatt TOA Forcing Forcing/AOD Forcing/Mass
(mg m2) (m2g ') 550 nm (W/m2) (W/m2) (W g')
Model abbreviations: CCM3 = Community Climate Model; GEOSCHEM-Goddard Earth Observing System-Chemistry; GISS = Goddard nstitute for Space Studies; SPRINTARS = Spectral Radiation-
Transport Model for Aerosol Species; LMD = Laboratoire de Meteorologie Dynamique; L0A=Laboratoire d'Optique Atmospherique; GAT0RG = Gas, Aerosol Transport and General circulation model;
PNNL=Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; UI0-CTM = Univeristy of Oslo CTM; UIO-GCM = University of Oslo GCM; UMI = University of Michigan; LSCE = Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de
('Environment; ECHAMS5-HAM = European Centre Hamburg with Hamburg Aerosol Module; ULAQ=University of IL'Aquila.
Source: Adapted from IPCC AR4 (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate, 2007,190988) and Schulz et al. (2006,190381)
Table 9-14. Particulate organic matter (POM) and BC mass loading, AOD at 550 nm, shortwave
radiative forcing at the top of the atmosphere, and normalized forcing with respect to AOD
and mass.
Model
Mass
load
(mg m 2)
MEE
(m2g')
AOD at
550 nm
TOA
Forcing
(W/m2)
Forcing/
AOD
(W/m2)
Forcing/
Mass
(W g')
Mass
load (mg
m2)
MEE
(m2g')
AOD at
550 nm
TOA
Forcing
(W/m2)
Forcing/
AOD
(W/m2)
Forcing/
Mass
(W g')
PUBLISHED SINCE IPCC 2001
A SPRINTARS
¦0.24
¦107
0.36
BL0A
2.33
6.9
0.016
¦0.25
¦16
¦140
0.37
0.55
C GISS
1.86
9.1
0.017
¦0.26
¦15
¦161
0.29
0.61
DGISS
1.86
8.1
0.015
¦0.30
¦20
¦75
0.29
0.35
E GISS*
2.39
¦0.18
¦92
0.39
0.50
F GISS
2.49
¦0.23
¦101
0.43
0.53
G SPRINTARS
2.67
10.9
0.029
¦0.27
¦9
¦23
0.53
0.42
HGAT0RG
2.56
¦0.06
¦112
0.39
0.55
1 M0ZGN
3.03
5.9
0.018
¦0.34
¦19
JCCM
0.33
0.34
K UI0-CTM
0.30
0.19
AEROCOM: IDENTICAL EMISSIONS FOR YR 2000 & 1750
L UMI
1.16
5.2
0.0060
¦0.23
¦38
¦198
0.19
6.8
1.29
0.25
194
1316
M UI0-CTM
1.12
5.2
0.0058
¦0.16
¦28
¦143
0.19
7.1
1.34
0.22
164
1158
NL0A
1.41
6.0
0.0085
¦0.16
¦19
¦113
0.25
7.9
1.98
0.32
162
1280
0LSCE
1.50
5.3
0.0079
¦0.17
¦22
¦113
0.25
4.4
1.11
0.30
270
1200
PECHAMS-HAM
1.00
7.7
0.0077
¦0.10
¦13
¦100
0.16
7.7
1.23
0.20
163
1250
Q GISS**
1.22
4.9
0.0060
¦0.14
¦23
¦115
0.24
7.6
1.83
0.22
120
917
R UIO-GCM
0.88
5.2
0.0046
¦0.06
¦13
¦68
0.19
10.3
1.95
0.36
185
1895
S SPRINTARS
1.84
10.9
0.0200
¦0.10
¦5
¦54
0.37
9.5
3.50
0.32
91
865
TULAQ
1.71
4.4
0.0075
¦0.09
¦12
¦53
0.38
7.6
2.90
0.08
28
211
Average A-K
2.40
8.2
0.019
-0.24
-16
-102
0.37
0.44
1242
Average L-T
1.32
6.1
0.008
-0.13
-19
-106
0.25
7.7
1.90
0.25
153
1121
Minimum A-T
0.88
4.4
0.005
-0.34
-38
-198
0.16
4.4
1.11
0.08
28
211
Maximum A-T
3.03
10.9
0.029
-0.06
-5
-23
0.53
10.3
3.50
0.61
270
2103
Std dev A-K
0.39
1.7
0.006
0.09
4
41
0.08
0.06
384
Std dev L-T
0.32
2.0
0.005
0.05
10
46
0.08
1.6
0.82
0.09
68
450
%Stddev/avg A-K
16%
21%
30%
36%
26%
41%
22%
23%
31%
July 2009
9-166
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Model
Mass
load
(mg m2)
MEE
(m2g')
AOD at
550 nm
TOA
Forcing
(W/m2)
Forcing/
AOD
(W/m2)
Forcing/
Mass
(W g')
Mass
load (mg
m2)
MEE
(m2g')
AOD at
550 nm
TOA
Forcing
(W/m2)
Forcing/
AOD
(W/m2)
Forcing/
Mass
(W g')
%Stddev/avg L-T
25%
33%
56%
39%
52%
43%
32%
21%
43%
34%
45%
40%
Source: Based on IPCC AR4 (2007,190988) and Schulz et al. (2006,190381).
The IPCC AR.4 (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate, 2007, 190988) assessed
anthropogenic aerosol RF based on the model results published after the IPCC TAR. in
2001, including those from the AeroCom study discussed above. These results
(adopted from IPCC AR4) are shown in Table 9"13 for sulfate and Table 9"14 for
carbonaceous aerosols (BC and POM), respectively. All values listed in Table 9"13 and
9.14 refer to anthropogenic perturbation, i.e., excluding the natural fraction of these
aerosols. In addition to the mass burden, MEE, and AOD, Table 9"13 and 9.14 also list
the "normalized forcing", also known as "forcing efficiency", one for the forcing per
unit AOD, and the other the forcing per gram of aerosol mass (dry). For some models,
aerosols are externally mixed, that is, each aerosol particle contains only one aerosol
type such as sulfate, whereas other models allow aerosols to mix internally to
different degrees, that is, each aerosol particle can have more than one component,
such as black carbon coated with sulfate. For models with internal mixing of aerosols,
the component values for AOD, MEE, and forcing were extracted (Schulz et al., 2006,
190381).
Considerable variation exists among these models for all quantities in Table 9"13
and 9.14. The RF for all the components varies by a factor of 6 or more- Sulfate from
0.16 to 0.96 W/m2, POM from -0.06 to -0.34 W/m2, and BC from +0.08 to +0.61 W/m2,
with the standard deviation in the range of 30 to 40% of the ensemble mean. It should
be noted that although BC has the lowest mass loading and AOD, it is the only aerosol
species that absorbs strongly, causing positive forcing to warm the atmosphere, in
contrast to other aerosols that impose negative forcing to cool the atmosphere. As a
result, the net anthropogenic aerosol forcing as a whole becomes less negative when
BC is included. The global average anthropogenic aerosol direct RF at the top of the
atmosphere (TOA) from the models, together with observation-based estimates (see
Chapter 2 of the CCSP SAP2.3), is presented in Figure 9"72. Note the wide range for
forcing in Figure 9"72. The comparison with observation-based estimates shows that
the model estimated forcing is in general lower, partially because the forcing value
from the model is the difference between present-day and pre "industrial time,
whereas the observation-derived quantity is the difference between an atmosphere
with and without anthropogenic aerosols, so the "background" value that is subtracted
from the total forcing is higher in the models. The discussion so far has dealt with
global average values. The geographic distributions of multi-model aerosol direct RF
has been evaluated among the AeroCom models, which are shown in Figure 9"73 for
total and anthropogenic AOD at 550 nm and anthropogenic aerosol RF at TOA, within
the atmospheric column, and at the surface. Globally, anthropogenic AOD is about
25% of total AOD (Figure 9"73a and b) but is more concentrated over polluted regions
in Asia, Europe, and North America and biomass burning regions in tropical southern
Africa and South America. At TOA, anthropogenic aerosol causes negative forcing over
mid-latitude continents and oceans with the most negative values ("1 to "2 W/m2) over
polluted regions (Figure 9-73C). Although anthropogenic aerosol has a cooling effect at
the surface with surface forcing values down to "10 W/m2 over China, India, and
tropical Africa (Figure 9-73E), it warms the atmospheric column with the largest
effects again over the polluted and biomass burning regions. This heating effect will
change the atmospheric circulation and can affect the weather and precipitation (e.g.,
Kim et al., 2006, 190917).
July 2009
9-167
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
i
H
O
T
E-XI
8
B
t.
a
*j
ti
E
c
u
<
Asro&ul Direct Radiative Forcing
nr
Bfileuiftci* tiCi)
CNng u-f .
iu fJT # \iWt\
rasE 1 !• imp i—
-------
biomass burning) is "0.22 ± 0.18 W/m2 averaged globally, exerting a net cooling effect.
This value would represent the low-end of the forcing magnitude, since some
potentially significant anthropogenic aerosols, such as nitrate and dust from human
activities are not included because of their highly uncertain sources and processes.
IPCC AR4 had adjusted the total anthropogenic aerosol direct RF to "0.5 ± 0.4 W/m2 by
adding estimated anthropogenic nitrate and dust forcing values based on limited
modeling studies and by considering the observation-based estimates (see Chapter 2 of
the CCSP SAP2.3).
¦ Both sulfate and POM negative forcing whereas BC causes positive forcing because of
its highly absorbing nature. Although BC comprises only a small fraction of
anthropogenic aerosol mass load and AOD, its forcing efficiency (with respect to either
AOD or mass) is an order of magnitude stronger than sulfate and POM, so its positive
shortwave forcing largely offsets the negative forcing from sulfate and POM. This
points out the importance of improving the model ability to simulate each individual
aerosol components more accurately, especially black carbon. Separately, it is
estimated from recent model studies that anthropogenic sulfate, POM, and BC forcings
at TOA are "0.4, "0.18, +0.35 W/m2, respectively. The anthropogenic nitrate and dust
forcings are estimated at "0.1 W/m2 for each, with uncertainties exceeds 100%
(Intergovernmental Panel on Climate, 2007, 190988).
¦ In contrast to long-lived greenhouse gases, anthropogenic aerosol RF exhibits
significant regional and seasonal variations. The forcing magnitude is the largest over
the industrial and biomass burning source regions, where the magnitude of the
negative aerosol forcing can be of the same magnitude or even stronger than that of
positive greenhouse gas forcing.
¦ There is a large spread of model-calculated aerosol RF even in the global annual
averaged values. The AeroCom study shows that the model diversity at some locations
(mostly East Asia and African biomass burning regions) can reach ± 3 W/m2, which is
an order of magnitude above the global averaged forcing value of "0.22 W/m2. The large
diversity reflects the low level of current understanding of aerosol radiative forcing,
which is compounded by uncertainties in emissions, transport, transformation,
removal, particle size, and optical and microphysical (including hygroscopic) properties.
¦ In spite of the relatively small value of forcing at TOA, the magnitudes of
anthropogenic forcing at the surface and within the atmospheric column are
considerably larger- "1 to "2 W/m2 at the surface and +0.8 to +2 W/m2 in the
atmosphere. Anthropogenic aerosols thus cool the surface but heat the atmosphere, on
average. Regionally, the atmospheric heating can reach annually averaged values
exceeding 5 W/m2 (Figure 9-73D). These regional effects and the negative surface
forcing are expected to exert an important effect on climate through alteration of the
hydrological cycle.
July 2009
9-169
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Figure 9-73. Aerosol optical thickness and anthropogenic shortwave all-sky radiative forcing from
the AeroOom study. Shown in the figure: total AOD (A) and anthropogenic AOD (B) at
550 nm, and radiative forcing at TOA (C), atmospheric column (D)f and surface (E).
O.&O
~.SO
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
~.SO
0.00
0.0ft
0.04
0,02
0,00
- 1-SU .135 K> -45 0
Lonffftata
1.0
0.5
0,3
0.0
-0.2
-Q.S
-i.a
-2.a
Vi/m2
5.0
*.0
3.a
2.0
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.0
-0.2
-a.o
-i.a
-2.a
-j.a
-+.~
-5.0
Source: Schulz et al. (2006,190381) and AeroCom image catalog (http:// nansen.ipsl.jussieu.fr/AEROCOMIdata.html).
LnnplutH
D
-130 135 40 -45 0 45 M 1S6 lflO
Inn^tuin
WI'UKWM
0.3000
Q.2KJD
0.10Q0
~.0750
0.0500
o.oaso
0.0100
0.0050
0.DD25
0.0010
Q.OOQO
July 2009
9-170
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Raciialivs Forcing tram CJolkI Albodn Eftecl
lti
mri
t
Ci
a
¦jH
lv-l
¦>1
a
2
¦s
[— ' f 1 t ' 1
Mnomy fJanai «td 3QQ11
HBfJfe? iWMimw m . KWibl
1
CS»SO 'Tlntirav''' Mid Rammr. 2Q011
'n
(AW u< - XSOni
\
CSIRQ ami Uu. 2Q0®|
1
1
t MOJ (fliwul 4 WJM i
vMCZj^OLDES {Oftwi m m
i
1 1
GFDL I«hUtqM Hi. smabj
1
FDHAM ^L«^frn Hi m , Kffil
•H
PMNL
.Tl»,
IWDZ'MODia i.Oiim m Bimtfw ztwii
i #
L I
LA* fiitt i Cho ¦ ami £0001
1
UU V Chop qjljJ PfT*g|. 30061
UM 2 Qrrt2 and Furwaf. L>jl'ji
r J
H
IJMJJ i!Swr nnd Ptennw. XBel
UMJ) >;ci4«i and FsniMLr, JKi
UM_» |
t— -1
1 a 1 a 1 I 1
-SLO -1_S -t,Q -&5
RadiativB Fcfrci'ip (Wm"2J
Source: IPCC (2007. 190988).
Figure 9-74. Radiative forcing from the cloud albedo effect {1st aerosol indirect effect) in the global
climate models used from IPCC (2007,190988), Chapter 2, Figure 2.14, of the IPCC AR4.
Species included in the lower panel are S(h2", sea salt, organic and BC, dust and
nitrates; in the top panel, only Sth2", sea salt and OC are included.
July 2009
9-171
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
9.3.6.4. Calculating Aerosol Indirect Forcing
Aerosol Effects on Clouds. A subset of the aerosol particles can act as cloud
condensation nuclei (CCN) and/or ice nuclei (IN). Increases in aerosol particle
concentrations, therefore, may increase the ambient concentrations of CCN and IN,
affecting cloud properties. For a fixed cloud liquid water content, a CCN increase will
lead to more cloud droplets so that the cloud droplet size will decrease. That effect
leads to brighter clouds, the enhanced albedo then being referred to as the "cloud
albedo effect" (Twomey, 1977, 190533). also known as the first indirect effect. If the
droplet size is smaller, it may take longer to rainout, leading to an increase in cloud
lifetime, hence the "cloud lifetime" effect (Albrecht, 1989, 045783). also called the
second indirect effect. Approximately one-third of the models used for the IPCC 20th
century climate change simulations incorporated an aerosol indirect effect, generally
(though not exclusively) considered only with sulfates.
Shown in Figure 9"74 are results from published model studies indicating the
different RF values from the cloud albedo effect. The cloud albedo effect ranges from -
0.22 to "1.85 W/m2; the lowest estimates are from simulations that constrained
representation of aerosol effects on clouds with satellite measurements of drop size vs.
aerosol index. In view of the difficulty of quantifying this effect remotely (discussed
later), it is not clear whether this constraint provides an improved estimate. The
estimate in the IPCC AR4 ranges from +0.4 to -1.1 W/m2, with a "best-guess" estimate
of 0.7 W/m2.
The representation of cloud effects in GCMs is considered below. However, it is
becoming increasingly clear from studies based on high resolution simulations of
aerosol-cloud interactions that there is a great deal of complexity that is unresolved in
climate models. This point is examined below (High Resolution Modeling).
Most models did not incorporate the "cloud lifetime effect." Hansen et al. (2005,
059087) compared this latter influence (in the form of time-averaged cloud area or
cloud cover increase) with the cloud albedo effect. In contrast to the discussion in
IPCC (2007, 189430). they argue that the cloud cover effect is more likely to be the
dominant one, as suggested both by cloud-resolving model studies (Ackerman et al.,
2004, 190056) and satellite observations (Kaufman et al., 2005, 155891). The cloud
albedo effect may be partly offset by reduced cloud thickness accompanying aerosol
pollutants, producing a meteorological (cloud) rather than aerosol effect (see the
discussion in Lohman and Feichter, 2005, 155942). The distinction between
meteorological feedback and aerosol forcing can become quite opaque! as noted earlier,
the term feedback is restricted here to those processes that are responding to a change
in temperature. Nevertheless, both aerosol indirect effects were utilized in Hansen et
al. (2005, 059087). with the second indirect effect calculated by relating cloud cover to
the aerosol number concentration, which in turn is a function of sulfate, nitrate, black
carbon and organic carbon concentration. Only the low altitude cloud influence was
modeled, principally because there are greater aerosol concentrations at low levels,
and because low clouds currently exert greater cloud RF. The aerosol influence on high
altitude clouds, associated with IN changes, is a relatively unexplored area for models
and as well for process-level understanding.
Hansen et al. (2005, 059087) used coefficients to normalize the cooling from
aerosol indirect effects to between "0.75 and "1 W/m2, based on comparisons of
modeled and observed changes in the diurnal temperature range as well as some
satellite observations. The response of the GISS model to the direct and two indirect
effects is shown in Figure 9-75. As parameterized, the cloud lifetime effect produced
somewhat greater negative RF (cooling), but this was the result of the coefficients
chosen. Geographically, it appears that the "cloud cover" effect produced slightly more
cooling in the Southern Hemisphere than did the "cloud albedo" response, with the
reverse being true in the Northern Hemisphere (differences on the order of a few
tenths °C).
July 2009
9-172
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Model Experiments. There are many different factors that can explain the
large divergence of aerosol indirect effects in models (Figure 9-744). To explore this in
more depth, I Vnner et al. (2006, 190564) used three general circulation models to
analyze the differences between models for the first indirect effect, as well as a
combined first plus second indirect effect. The models all had different cloud and/or
convection parameterizations. In the first experiment, the monthly average aerosol
mass and size distribution of, effectively, sulfate aerosol were prescribed, and all
models followed the same prescription for parameterizing the cloud droplet number
concentration (OIDNC) as a function of aerosol concentration. In that sense, the only
difference among the models was their separate cloud formation and radiation
schemes. The different models all produced similar droplet effective radii, and
therefore shortwave cloud forcing, and change in net outgoing whole sky radiation
between pre-indust rial times and the present. Hence the first indirect effect was not a
strong function of the cloud or radiation scheme. The results for this and the following
experiments are presented in Figure 9-76, where the experimental results are shown
sequentially from left to right for the whole sky effect and in Table 9-15 for the clear-
sky and cloud forcing response as well,
AIE: CIdAlb {I Run
AIE: CSdAlb
AIE: CldCov
Cloud Cover (%)
Direct .16
Aerosol Direct arid Indirect Effects
Planetary Albedo (%)
.14
ATs (°C)
Direct {I E3 Run) -.32
All- r. V > K. ; : 4,
V -* j
-23'5 a -I -5-.2 2 .5 ! 2 5 19 -5 -2 -I -.S-.2 -.1,1 .2 .5 I 2 5
Source: Hansen et al. (2005,059087).
Figure 9-75. Anthropogenic impact on cloud cover, planetary albedo, radiative flux at the surface
(while holding sea surface temperatures and sea ice fixed} and surface air temperature
change from the direct aerosol forcing (top row), the first indirect effect (second row)
and the second indirect effect (third row). The temperature change is calculated from
years 81-120 of a coupled atmosphere simulation with the GISS model.
The change in cloud forcing is the difference between whole sky and clear sky
outgoing radiation in the present day minus pre-industrial simulation. The large
differences seen between experiments 5 and 6 are due to the inclusion of the clear sky
component of aerosol scattering and absorption (the direct effect) in experiment 6.
July 2009
9-173
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
In the second experiment, the aerosol mass and size distribution were again
prescribed, but now each model used its own formulation for relating aerosols to
droplets. In this case one of the models produced larger effective radii and therefore a
much smaller first indirect aerosol effect (Figure 9.76, Table !> I However, even in
the two models where the effective radius change and net global forcing were similar,
the spatial patterns of cloud forcing differ, especially over the biomass burning regions
of Africa and South America.
The third experiment allowed the models to relate the change in droplet size to
change in precipitation efficiency (i.e. < they were now also allowing the second indirect
.effect. — smaller droplets being less efficient rain producers — as well asthe first). The;
models utilized the same relationship for autoconversion of cloud droplets to
precipitation. Changing the precipitation efficiency results in all models producing an
increase in cloud liquid water path, although the effect on cloud fraction was smaller
than in the previous experiments. The net result was to increase the negative
radiative forcing in all three models, albeit with different magnitudes^ for two of the
models the net impact on outgoing shortwave radiative increased by about 20%,
whereas in the third model (which hadthe much smaller first indirect effect), it was
magnified by a factor of three..
Exp I Exp 2 Exp 3 Exp 4 Exp S Exp 6
(_AM-CHwl
LMD
i, cess
Source: Adapted from Penner et al. (2006,190564).
Figure 9-76. Global average present-day short wave cloud forcing at TOA (top) and change in whole
sky net outgoing shortwave radiation (bottom) between the present-day and pre-
industrial simulations for each model in each experiment.
July 2009
9-174
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table 9-15. Differences in present day and pre-industrial outgoing solar radiation (W/m2) in the
different experiments.
Model
EXP 1
EXP 2
EXP 3
EXP 4
EXP 5
EXP 6
WHOLESKY
CAM-Oslo
¦0.648
¦0.726
¦0.833
¦0.580
¦0.365
¦0.518
LMD-Z
¦0.682
¦0.597
¦0.722
¦1.194
¦1.479
¦1.553
CCSR
¦0.739
¦0.218
¦0.733
¦0.350
¦1.386
¦1.386
CLEARSKY
CAM-Oslo
¦0.063
¦0.066
¦0.026
0.014
¦0.054
¦0.575
LMD-Z
¦0.054
0.019
0.030
¦0.066
¦0.126
¦1.034
CCSR
0.018
¦0.007
¦0.045
¦0.008
0.018
¦1.160
CLOUDFORCING
CAM-Oslo
¦0.548
¦0.660
¦0.807
¦0.595
¦0.311
0.056
LMD-Z
¦0.628
¦0.616
¦0.752
¦1.128
¦1.353
¦0.518
CCSR
¦0.757
¦0.212
¦0.728
¦0.345
¦1.404
¦0.200
EXP1: tests cloud formation and radiation schemes
EXP2: tests formulation for relating aerosols to droplets
EXP3: tests inclusion of droplet size influence on precipitation efficiency
EXP4: tests formulation of droplet size influence on precipitation efficiency
EXP5: tests model aerosol formulation from common sources
EXP6: added the direct aerosol effect
Source: Adapted from Penner et al. (2006,190564).
In the fourth experiment, the models were now each allowed to use their own
formulation to relate aerosols to precipitation efficiency. This introduced some
additional changes in the whole sky shortwave forcing (Figure 9-76).
In the fifth experiment, models were allowed to produce their own aerosol
concentrations, but were given common sources. This produced the largest changes in
the RF in several of the models. Within any one model, therefore, the change in
aerosol concentration has the largest effect on droplet concentrations and effective
radii. This experiment too resulted in large changes in RF.
In the last experiment, the aerosol direct effect was included, based on the full
range of aerosols used in each model. While the impact on the whole-sky forcing was
not large, the addition of aerosol scattering and absorption primarily affected the
change in clear sky radiation (Table 9" 15).
The results of this study emphasize that in addition to questions concerning cloud
physics, the differences in aerosol concentrations among the models play a strong role
in inducing differences in the indirect effect(s), as well as the direct one.
Observational constraints on climate model simulations of the indirect effect with
satellite data (e.g., MODIS) have been performed previously in a number of studies
(e.g., Storlevmo et al., 2006, 190418; Lohmann et al., 2006, 190451; Quaas et al., 2006,
190915! Menon et al., 2008, 190534). These have been somewhat limited since the
satellite retrieved data used do not have the vertical profiles needed to resolve aerosol
and cloud fields (e.g., cloud droplet number and liquid water content); the temporal
resolution of simultaneous aerosol and cloud product retrievals are usually not
available at a frequency of more than one a day; and higher level clouds often obscure
low clouds and aerosols. Thus, the indirect effect, especially the second indirect effect,
remains, to a large extent, unconstrained by satellite observations. However,
improved measurements of aerosol vertical distribution from the newer generation of
July 2009
9-175
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
sensors on the A-train platform may provide a better understanding of changes to
cloud properties from aerosols. Simulating the top-of-atmosphere reflectance for
comparison to satellite measured values could be another way to compare model with
observations, which would eliminate the inconsistent assumptions of aerosol optical
properties and surface reflectance encountered when compared the model calculated
and satellite retrieved AOD values.
Additional Aerosol Influences. Various observations have empirically related
aerosols injected from biomass burning or industrial processes to reductions in
rainfall (e.g., Warner, 1968, 157114! Eagan et al., 1974, 190231; Andreae et al., 2004,
155658; Rosenfeld, 2000, 002234). There are several potential mechanisms associated
with this response.
In addition to the two indirect aerosol effects noted above, a process denoted as
the "semidirect" effect involves the absorption of solar radiation by aerosols such as
black carbon and dust. The absorption increases the temperature, thus lowering the
relative humidity and producing evaporation, hence a reduction in cloud liquid water.
The impact of this process depends strongly on what the effective aerosol absorption
actually is! the more absorbing the aerosol, the larger the potential positive forcing on
climate (by reducing low level clouds and allowing more solar radiation to reach the
surface). This effect is responsible for shifting the critical value of SSA (separating
aerosol cooling from aerosol warming) from 0.86 with fixed clouds to 0.91 with varying
clouds (Hansen et al., 1997, 043104). Reduction in cloud cover and liquid water is one
way aerosols could reduce rainfall.
More generally, aerosols can alter the location of solar radiation absorption within
the system, and this aspect alone can alter climate and precipitation even without
producing any change in net radiation at the top of the atmosphere (the usual metric
for climate impact). By decreasing solar absorption at the surface, aerosols (from both
the direct and indirect effects) reduce the energy available for evapotranspiration,
potentially resulting in a decrease in precipitation. This effect has been suggested as
the reason for the decrease in pan evaporation over the last 50 yr (Roderick and
Farquhar, 2002, 042788). The decline in solar radiation at the surface appears to have
ended in the 1990s (Wild et al., 2005, 156156). perhaps because of reduced aerosol
emissions in industrial areas (Kruger and Grasl, 2002, 190200). although this issue is
still not settled.
Energy absorption by aerosols above the boundary layer can also inhibit
precipitation by warming the air at altitude relative to the surface, i.e., increasing
atmospheric stability. The increased stability can then inhibit convection, affecting
both rainfall and atmospheric circulation (Ramanathan et al., 2001, 042681! Chung
and Zhang, 2004, 190054). To the extent that aerosols decrease droplet size and
reduce precipitation efficiency, this effect by itself could result in lowered rainfall
values locally.
In their latest simulations, Hansen et al. (2007, 190597) did find that the indirect
aerosol effect reduced tropical precipitation! however, the effect is similar regardless of
which of the two indirect effects is used, and also similar to the direct effect. So it is
likely that the reduction of tropical precipitation is because of aerosol induced cooling
at the surface and the consequent reduced evapotranspiration. Similar conclusions
were reached by Yu et al. (2002, 190923) and Feingold et al. (2005, 190550). In this
case, the effect is a feedback and not a forcing.
The local precipitation change, through its impacts on dynamics and soil
moisture, can have large positive feedbacks. Harvey (2004, 190598) concluded from
assessing the response to aerosols in eight coupled models that the aerosol impact on
precipitation was larger than on temperature. He also found that the precipitation
impact differed substantially among the models, with little correlation among them.
Recent GCM simulations have further examined the aerosol effects on
hydrological cycle. Ramanathan et al. (2005, 190199) showed from fully coupled
ocean-atmosphere GCM experiments that the "solar dimming" effect at the surface,
July 2009
9-176
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
i.e., the reduction of solar radiation reaching the surface, due to the inclusion of
absorbing aerosol forcing causes a reduction in surface evaporation, a decrease in
meridional sea surface temperature (SST) gradient and an increase in atmospheric
stability, and a reduction in rainfall over South Asia. Lau and Kim (2006, 190226)
examined the direct effects of aerosol on the monsoon water cycle variability from
GCM simulations with prescribed realistic global aerosol forcing and proposed the
"elevated heat pump" effect, suggesting that atmospheric heating by absorbing
aerosols (dust and black carbon), through water cycle feedback, may lead to a
strengthening of the South Asia monsoon. These model results are not necessarily at
odds with each other, but rather illustrate the complexity of the aerosol-monsoon
interactions that are associated with different mechanisms, whose relative importance
in affecting the monsoon may be strongly dependent on spatial and temporal scales
and the timing of the monsoon. These results may be model dependent and should be
further examined.
High Resolution Modeling. Largely by its nature, the representation of the
interaction between aerosol and clouds in GCMs is poorly resolved. This stems in
large part from the fact that GCMs do not resolve convection on their large grids
(order of several hundred km), that their treatment of cloud microphysics is rather
crude, and that as discussed previously, their representation of aerosol needs
improvement. Superparametrization efforts (where standard cloud parameterizations
in the GCM are replaced by resolving clouds in each grid column of the GCM via a
cloud resolving model) (e.g.,Grabowski, 2004, 190590) could lead the way for the
development of more realistic cloud fields and thus improved treatments of aerosol
cloud interactions in large-scale models. However, these are just being incorporated in
models that resolve both cloud and aerosols. Detailed cloud parcel models have been
developed to focus on the droplet activation problem (that asks under what conditions
droplets actually start forming) and questions associated with the first indirect effect.
The coupling of aerosol and cloud modules to dynamical models that resolve the large
turbulent eddies associated with vertical motion and clouds [large eddy simulations
(LES) models, with grid sizes of ~100 m and domains ~10 km] has proven to be a
powerful tool for representing the details of aerosol-cloud interactions together with
feedbacks (e.g., Feingold et al., 1994, 190535! Kogan et al., 1994, 190186; Stevens et
al., 1996, 190417! Feingold et al., 1999, 190540; Ackerman et al., 2004, 190056). This
section explores some of the complexity in the aerosol indirect effects revealed by such
studies to illustrate how difficult parameterizing these effects properly in GCMs could
really be.
The First Indirect Effect. The relationship between aerosol and drop
concentrations (or drop sizes) is a key piece of the first indirect effect puzzle. (It should
not, however, be equated to the first indirect effect which concerns itself with the
resultant RF). A huge body of measurement and modeling work points to the fact that
drop concentrations increase with increasing aerosol. The main unresolved questions
relate to the degree of this effect, and the relative importance of aerosol size
distribution, composition and updraft velocity in determining drop concentrations (for
a review, see Mcfiggans et al., 2006, 190532). Studies indicate that the aerosol number
concentration and size distribution are the most important aerosol factors. Updraft
velocity (unresolved by GCMs) is particularly important under conditions of high
aerosol particle number concentration.
Although it is likely that composition has some effect on drop number
concentrations, composition is generally regarded as relatively unimportant compared
to the other parameters (Fitzgerald, 1975, 095417; Feingold et al., 2003, 190551;
Ervens et al., 2005, 190527; Dusek et al., 2006, 155756). Therefore, it has been stated
that the significant complexity in aerosol composition can be modeled, for the most
part, using fairly simple parameterizations that reflect the soluble and insoluble
fractions (e.g., Rissler et al., 2004, 190225). However, composition cannot be simply
dismissed. Furthermore, chemical interactions also cannot be overlooked. Alarge
uncertainty remains concerning the impact of organic species on cloud droplet growth
kinetics, thus cloud droplet formation. Cloud drop size is affected by wet scavenging,
July 2009
9-177
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
which depends on aerosol composition especially for freshly emitted aerosol. And
future changes in composition will presumably arise due to biofuels/biomass burning
and a reduction in sulfate emissions, which emphasizes the need to include
composition changes in models when assessing the first indirect effect. The simple
soluble/insoluble fraction model may become less applicable than is currently the case.
The updraft velocity, and its change as climate warms, may be the most difficult
aspect to simulate in GCMs because of the small scales involved. In GCMs it is
calculated in the dynamics as a grid box average, and parameterized on the small
scale indirectly because it is a key part of convection and the spatial distribution of
condensate, as well as droplet activation. Numerous solutions to this problem have
been sought, including estimation of vertical velocity based on predicted turbulent
kinetic energy from boundary layer models (Lohmann et al., 1999, 190443; Larson et
al., 2001, 190212) and PDF representations of subgrid quantities, such as vertical
velocity and the vertically-integrated cloud liquid water ('liquid water path,' or LWP)
(Pincus and Klein, 2000, 190565! Golaz et al., 2002, 190587; 2002, 190589! Larson et
al., 2005, 190220). Embedding cloud-resolving models within GCMs is also being
actively pursued (Grabowski et al., 1999, 190592; Randall et al., 2003, 190201).
Numerous other details come into play! for example, the treatment of cloud droplet
activation in GCM frameworks is often based on the assumption of adiabatic
conditions, which may overestimate the sensitivity of cloud to changes in CCN
(Sotiropoulou et al., 2007, 190405! Sotiropoulou et al., 2006, 190406). This points to
the need for improved theoretical understanding followed by new parameterizations.
Other Indirect Effects. The second indirect effect is often referred to as the
"cloud lifetime effect", based on the premise that non-precipitating clouds will live
longer. In GCMs the "lifetime effect" is equivalent to changing the representation of
precipitation production and can be parameterized as an increase in cloud area or
cloud cover (e.g., Hansen et al., 2005, 059087). The second indirect effect hypothesis
states that the more numerous and smaller drops associated with aerosol
perturbations, suppress collision-induced rain, and result in a longer cloud lifetime.
Observational evidence for the suppression of rain in warm clouds exists in the form
of isolated studies (e.g., Warner, 1968, 157114) but to date there is no statistically
robust proof of surface rain suppression (Levin and Cotton, 2008, 190375). Results
from ship-track studies show that cloud water may increase or decrease in the tracks
(Coakley and Walsh, 2002, 192025) and satellite studies suggest similar results for
warm boundary layer clouds (Han et al., 2002, 049181). Ackerman et al. (2004,
190056) used LES to show that in stratocumulus, cloud water may increase or
decrease in response to increasing aerosol depending on the relative humidity of the
air overlaying the cloud. Wang et al. (2003, 157106) showed that all else being equal,
polluted stratocumulus clouds tend to have lower water contents than clean clouds
because the small droplets associated with polluted clouds evaporate more readily and
induce an evaporation-entrainment feedback that dilutes the cloud. This result was
confirmed by Xue and Feingold (2006, 190920) and Jiang and Feingold (2006, 190976)
for shallow cumulus, where pollution particles were shown to decrease cloud fraction.
Furthermore, Xue et al. (2008, 190921) suggested that there may exist two regimes'
the first, a precipitating regime at low aerosol concentrations where an increase in
aerosol will suppress precipitation and increase cloud cover (Albrecht, 1989, 045783);
and a second, non-precipitating regime where the enhanced evaporation associated
with smaller drops will decrease cloud water and cloud fraction.
The possibility of bistable aerosol states was proposed earlier by Baker and
Charlson (1990, 190016) based on consideration of aerosol sources and sinks. They
used a simple numerical model to suggest that the marine boundary layer prefers two
aerosol states' a clean, oceanic regime characterized by a weak aerosol source and less
reflective clouds! and a polluted, continental regime characterized by more reflective
clouds. On the other hand, study by Ackerman et al. (1994, 189975) did not support
such a bistable system using a somewhat more sophisticated model. Further
observations are needed to clarify the nature of cloud/aerosol interactions under a
variety of conditions.
July 2009
9-178
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Finally, the question of possible effects of aerosol on cloud lifetime was examined
by Jiang et al. (2006, 133165). who tracked hundreds of cumulus clouds generated by
LES from their formative stages until they dissipated. They showed that in the model
there was no effect of aerosol on cloud lifetime, and that cloud lifetime was dominated
by dynamical variability.
It could be argued that the representation of these complex feedbacks in GCMs is
not warranted until a better understanding of the processes is at hand. Moreover,
until GCMs are able to represent cloud scales, it is questionable what can be obtained
by adding microphysical complexity to poorly resolved clouds. Abetter representation
of aerosol-cloud interactions in GCMs therefore depends on the ability to improve
representation of aerosols and clouds, as well as their interaction, in the hydrologic
cycle. This issue is discussed further in the next chapter.
9.3.6.5. Aerosol in the Climate Models
Aerosol in the IPCC AR4 Climate Model Simulations. To assess the
atmospheric and climate response to aerosol forcing, e.g., changes in surface
temperate, precipitation, or atmospheric circulation, aerosols, together with
greenhouse gases should be an integrated part of climate model simulation under the
past, present, and future conditions. Table 9" 16 lists the forcing species that were
included in 25 climate modeling groups used in the IPCC AR4 (2007, 190988)
assessment. All the models included long-lived greenhouse gases, most models
included sulfate direct forcing, but only a fraction of those climate models considered
other aerosol types. In other words, aerosol RF was not adequately accounted for in
the climate simulations for the IPCC AR4. Put still differently, the current aerosol
modeling capability has not been fully incorporated into the climate model
simulations. As pointed out in Section 9.3.6.4, fewer than one-third of the models
incorporated an aerosol indirect effect, and most considered only sulfates.
The following discussion compares two of the IPCC AR4 climate models that
include all major forcing agencies in their climate simulation- the model from the
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) and from the NOAA Geophysical
Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL). The purpose in presenting these comparisons is
to help elucidate how modelers go about assessing their aerosol components, and the
difficulties that entail. A particular concern is how aerosol forcings were obtained in
the climate model experiments for IPCC AR4. Comparisons with observations have
already led to some improvements that can be implemented in climate models for
subsequent climate change experiments (e.g., Koch et al., 2006, 190184. for GISS
model). This aspect is discussed further in Chapter 4 of the CCSP SAP2.3.
July 2009
9-179
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table 9-16. Forcings used in IPCC AR4 simulations of 20th century climate change. This table is
adapted from SAP 1.1 Table 5.2 (compiled using information provided by the participating
modeling centers, see http://www.pcmdi.llnl.gov/ipcc/model-documentation/ipcc
model documentation.php) plus additional information from that website. Eleven different
forcings are listed: well-mixed greenhouse gases (G), tropospheric and stratospheric ozone
(0), SO42" aerosol direct (SD) and indirect effects (S), black carbon (BC) and organic carbon
aerosols (OC), mineral dust (MD), sea salt (SS), land use/land cover (LU), solar irradiance
(SO), and volcanic aerosols (V). Check mark denotes inclusion of a specific forcing. As used
here, "inclusion" means specification of a time-varying forcing, with changes on
interannual and longer timescales.
Model
Country
G
0
SD
SI
BC
OC
MD
SS
LU
so
V
1
BCC-CMI
China
¦V
¦V
V
2
BCCR-BCM2.0
Norway
-V
¦V
-V
V
3
CCSM3
USA
¦V
¦V
¦V
V
V
V
4
CGCM3.1 (T47)
Canada
¦V
¦V
5
CGCM3.1 (T63)
Canada
¦V
¦V
6
CNRM-CM3
France
¦V
¦V
7
CSIR0-Mk3.0
Australia
-V
¦V
8
CSIR0-Mk3.5
Australia
-V
¦V
9
ECHAMS/MPI-OM
Germany
¦V
¦V
V
10
ECHO-G
Germany/
Korea
~
~
~
~
~
~
11
FG0ALS-g1.0
China
~
~
12
GFDL-CM2.0
USA
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
13
GFDL-CM2.1
USA
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
14
GISS-AOM
USA
~
~
~
15
GISS-EH
USA
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
16
GISS-ER
USA
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
17
INGV-SXG
Italy
~
~
~
18
INM-CM3.0
Russia
~
~
~
19
IPSL-CM4
France
~
~
~
20
MICR0C3.2(hires)
Japan
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
21
MICR0C3.2(medres)
Japan
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
22
MRI-CGCM2.3.2
Japan
~
~
~
~
23
PCM
USA
¦V
¦V
¦V
V
V
24
UKM0-HasCM3
U.K.
¦V
-V
¦V
¦V
25
UKM0-HadGEM1
U.K.
¦V
¦V
¦V
V
V
The GISS Model . There have been many different configurations of aerosol
simulations in the GISS model over the years, with different emissions, physics
July 2009
9-180
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
packages, etc., as is apparent from the multiple GISS entries in the preceding figures
and tables. There were also three different GISS GCM submissions to IPCC AR4,
which varied in their model physics and ocean formulation.(Note that the aerosols in
these three GISS versions are different from those in the AeroCom simulations
described in Sections 9.3.6.2 and 9.3.6.3.) The GCM results discussed below all relate
to the simulations known as GISS model ER (Schmidt and et, 2006, 190373) (see
Table 9" 16). Although the detailed description and model evaluation have been
presented in Liu et al. (2006, 190422). below are the general characteristics of aerosols
in the GISS ER:
Aerosol lields-"Yhe aerosol fields used in the GISS ER is a prescribed
"climatology" which is obtained from chemistry transport model simulations with
monthly averaged mass concentrations representing conditions up to 1990. Aerosol
species included are sulfate, nitrate, BC, POM, dust, and sea salt. Dry size effective
radii are specified for each of the aerosol types, and laboratory-measured phase
functions are employed for all solar and thermal wavelengths. For hygroscopic
aerosols (sulfate, nitrate, POM, and sea salt), formulas are used for the particle
growth of each aerosol as a function of relative humidity, including the change in
density and optical parameters. With these specifications, the AOD, single scattering
albedo, and phase function of the various aerosols are calculated. While the aerosol
distribution is prescribed as monthly mean values, the relative humidity component of
the extinction is updated each hour. The global averaged AOD at 550 nm is about
0.15.
Global distribution-'When comparing with AOD from observations by multiple
satellite sensors of MODIS, MISR, POLDER, and AVHRR and surface based
sunphotometer network AERONET (see Chapter 2 of the CCSP SAP2.3 for detailed
information about data), qualitative agreement is apparent, with generally higher
burdens in Northern Hemisphere summer, and seasonal variations of smoke over
southern Africa and South America, as well as wind blown dust over northern African
and the Persian Gulf. Aerosol optical depth in both model and observations is smaller
away from land. There are, however, considerable discrepancies between the model
and observations. Overall, the GISS GCM has reduced aerosol optical depths
compared with the satellite data (a global, clear-sky average of about 80% compared
with MODIS and MISR data), although it is in better agreement with AERONET
ground-based measurements in some locations (note that the input aerosol values
were calibrated with AERONET data). The model values over the Sahel in Northern
Hemisphere winter and the Amazon in Southern Hemisphere winter are excessive,
indicative of errors in the biomass burning distributions, at least partially associated
with an older biomass burning source used (the source used here was from (Liousse et
al., 1996, 078158)).
Seasonal variation-' A comparison of the seasonal distribution of the globalAOD
between the GISS model and satellite data indicates that the model seasonal
variation is in qualitative agreement with observations for many of the locations that
represent major aerosol regimes, although there are noticeable differences. For
example, in some locations the seasonal variations are different from or even opposite
to the observations.
Particle size parameter' The Angstrom exponent Of), which is determined by the
contrast between the AOD at two or more different wavelengths and is related to
aerosol particle size (discussed in Section 9.3.6.3). This parameter is important
because the particle size distribution affects the efficiency of scattering of both short
and long wave radiation, as discussed earlier. A from the GISS model is biased low
compared with AERONET, MODIS, and POLDER data, although there are technical
differences in determining the A. This low bias suggests that the aerosol particle size
in the GISS model is probably too large. The average effective radius in the GISS
model appears to be 0.3-0.4 ]im, whereas the observational data indicates a value
more in the range of 0.2-0.3 jim (Liu et al., 2006, 190422).
July 2009
9-181
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Single scattering albedo-The model-calculated SSA (at 550 nm) appears to be
generally higher than the AERONET data at worldwide locations (not enough
absorption), but lower than AERONET data in Northern Africa, the Persian Gulf, and
the Amazon (too much absorption). This discrepancy reflects the difficulties in
modeling BC, which is the dominant absorbing aerosol, and aerosol sizes. Global
averaged SSA at 550 nm from the GISS model is at about 0.95.
Aerosol direct RF- The GISS model calculated anthropogenic aerosol direct
shortwave RF is "0.56 W/m2 at TOAand "2.87 W/m2 at the surface. The TOAforcing
(upper left, Figure 9-77) indicates that, as expected, the model has larger negative
values in polluted regions and positive forcing at the highest latitudes. At the surface
(lower left, Figure 9-77) GISS model values exceed "4 W/m2 over large regions. Note
there is also a longwave RF of aerosols (right column), although they are much weaker
than the shortwave RF.
There are several concerns for climate change simulations related to the aerosol
trend in the GISS model. One is that the aerosol fields in the GISS AR4 climate
simulation (version ER) are kept fixed after 1990. In fact, the observed trend shows a
reduction in tropospheric aerosol optical thickness from 1990 through the present, at
least over the oceans (Mishchenko and Geogdzhayev, 2007, 190545). Hansen et al.
(2007, 190597) suggested that the deficient warming in the GISS model over Eurasia
post" 1990 was due to the lack of this trend. Indeed, a possible conclusion from the
Penner et al. (2002, 190562) study was that the GISS model overestimated the AOD
(presumably associated with anthropogenic aerosols) poleward of 30°N. However,
when an alternate experiment reduced the aerosol optical depths, the polar warming
became excessive (Hansen et al., 2007, 190597). The other concern is that the GISS
model may underestimate the organic and sea salt AOD, and overestimate the
influence of black carbon aerosols in the biomass burning regions (deduced from
Penner et al., 2002, 190562; Liu et al., 2006, 190422). To the extent that is true, it
would indicate the GISS model underestimates the aerosol direct cooling effect in a
substantial portion of the tropics, outside of biomass burning areas. Clarifying those
issues requires numerous modeling experiments and various types of observations.
The GFDL Model . A comprehensive description and evaluation of the GFDL
aerosol simulation are given in Ginoux et al. (2006, 190582). Below are the general
characteristics'
Aerosol Gelds-"Yhe aerosols used in the GFDL climate experiments are obtained
from simulations performed with the MOZART 2 model (Model for Ozone and Related
chemical Tracers) (Horowitz et al., 2003, 057770! Horowitz, 2006, 190620). The
exceptions were dust, which was generated with a separate simulation of MOZART 2,
using sources from Ginoux et al. (2001, 190579) and wind fields from NCEP/NCAR
reanalysis data! and sea salt, whose monthly mean concentrations were obtained from
a previous study by Haywood et al. (1999, 040453). It includes most of the same
aerosol species as in the GISS model (although it does not include nitrates), and, as in
the GISS model, relates the dry aerosol to wet aerosol optical depth via the model's
relative humidity for sulfate (but not for organic carbon); for sea salt, a constant
relative humidity of 80% was used. Although the parameterizations come from
different sources, both models maintain a very large growth in sulfate particle size
when the relative humidity exceeds 90%.
Global distributions-' Overall, the GFDL global mean aerosol mass loading is
within 30% of that of other studies (Chin et al., 2002, 189996; Tie and et, 2005,
190459; Reddy et al., 2005, 190207). except for sea salt, which is 2 to 5 times smaller.
However, the sulfate AOD (0.1) is 2.5 times that of other studies, whereas the organic
carbon value is considerably smaller (on the order of 1/2). Both of these differences are
influenced by the relationship with relative humidity. In the GFDL model, sulfate is
allowed to grow up to 100% relative humidity, but organic carbon does not increase in
size as relative humidity increases. Comparison of AOD with AVHRR and MODIS
data for the time period 1996-2000 shows that the global mean value over the ocean
(0.15) agrees with AVHRR data (0.14) but there are significant differences regionally,
July 2009
9-182
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
with the model overestimating the value in the northern mid latitude oceans and
underestimating it in the southern ocean. Comparison with MODIS also shows good
agreement globally (0.1-5.), but in this case indicates large disagreements over land,
with the model producing excessive A1 >1) over industrialized countries and
underestimating the effect over Worn ass burning regions. Overall, the global averaged
AOD at 550 nm is 0.17, which is higher than the maximum values in the AeroConvA
experiments (Table 9-12/ and exceeds the observed value too (Ae and S* in Figure
9-71).
net thermal BOA
ml_.ji_.l_j. i i — .. i i i —
A -J -2 -I 0 \ 1 3 4 5 -5 -A -J -.2 -J 0 .1 3 5.7 I.I
Source: Figure provided by A. Lacis, GISS.
Figure 9-77. Direct radiative farcing by anthropogenic aerosols in the GISS model (including sulfates,
BC, 0C and nitrates). Short wave forcing at TOA and surface are shown in the top left
and bottom left panels. The corresponding thermal forcing is indicated in the right hand
panels.
Composition¦ Comparison of GPDL modeled species with in situ data over North
America, Europe, and over oceans has revealed that the sulfate is overestimated in
spring and summer and underestimated in winter in many regions, including Europe
and North America, Organic and black carbon aerosols are also overestimated in
polluted regions by a factor of two, whereas organic carbon aerosols are elsewhere
underestimated by factors of 2 to •">. Dust concentrations at the surface agree with
observations to within a factor of 2 in most places where significant dust exists,
although over the southwest U.S. it is a factor of 10 too large. Surface concentrations
of sea salt are underestimated by more than a factor of 2, Over the oceans, the
excessive sulfate AOD compensates for the low se.a salt values except in the southern
oceans. Size and single -scattering albedo* No specific comparison was given for
July 2009
9-183
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
particle size or single-scattering albedo, but the excessive sulfate would likely produce
too high a value of reflectivity relative to absorption except in some polluted regions
where black carbon (an absorbing aerosol) is also overestimated.
As in the case of the GISS model, there are several concerns with the GFDL
model. The good global-average agreement masks an excessive aerosol loading over
the Northern Hemisphere (in particular, over the northeast U.S. and Europe) and an
underestimate over biomass burning regions and the southern oceans. Several model
improvements are needed, including better parameterization of hygroscopic growth at
high relative humidity for sulfate and organic carbon! better sea salt simulations!
correcting an error in extinction coefficients; and improved biomass burning emissions
inventory (Ginoux et al., 2006, 190582).
Comparisons between GISS and GFDL Model. Both giss and gfdl
models were used in the IPCC AR.4 climate simulations for climate sensitivity that
included aerosol forcing. It would be constructive, therefore, to compare the
similarities and differences of aerosols in these two models and to understand what
their impacts are in climate change simulations. Figure 9"78 shows the percentage
AOD from different aerosol components in the two models.
Sulfate-"The sulfate AOD from the GISS model is within the range of that from all
other models (Table 9"13), but that from the GFDL model exceeds the maximum value
by a factor of 2.5. An assessment in SAP 3.2 (CCSP, 2008, 192028; Shin dell et al.,
2008, 190393) also concludes that GFDL had excessive sulfate AOD compared with
other models. The sulfate AOD from GFDL is nearly a factor of 4 large than that from
GISS, although the sulfate burden differs only by about 50% between the two models.
Clearly, this implies a large difference in sulfate MEE between the two models.
BC and POM-' Compared to observations, the GISS model appears to overestimate
the influence of BC and POM in the biomass burning regions and underestimate it
elsewhere, whereas the GFDL model is somewhat the reverse- it overestimates it in
polluted regions, and underestimates it in biomass burning areas. The global
comparison shown in Table 9"14 indicates the GISS model has values similar to those
from other models, which might be the result of such compensating errors. The GISS
and GFDL models have relatively similar global-average black carbon contributions,
and the same appears true for POM.
Sea salt-"Yhe GISS model has a much larger sea salt contribution than does
GFDL (or indeed other models).
Global and regional distributions-' Overall, the global averaged AOD is 0.15 from
the GISS model and 0.17 from GFDL. However, as shown in Figure 9"78, the
contribution to this AOD from different aerosol components shows greater disparity.
For example, over the Southern Ocean where the primary influence is due to sea salt
in the GISS model, but in the GFDL it is sulfate. The lack of satellite observations of
the component contributions and the limited available in situ measurements make
the model improvements at aerosol composition level difficult.
Climate simulations-' With such large differences in aerosol composition and
distribution between the GISS and GFDL models, one might expect that the model
simulated surface temperature might be quite different. Indeed, the GFDL model was
able to reproduce the observed temperature change during the 20th century without
the use of an indirect aerosol effect, whereas the GISS model required a substantial
indirect aerosol contribution (more than half of the total aerosol forcing; (Hansen et
al., 2007, 190597). It is likely that the reason for this difference was the excessive
direct effect in the GFDL model caused by its overestimation of the sulfate optical
depth. The GISS model direct aerosol effect (see Section 9.3.6.6) is close to that
derived from observations (Chapter 2 of the CCSP SAP2.3); this suggests that for
models with climate sensitivity close to 0.75°C/(W/m2) (as in the GISS and GFDL
models), an indirect effect is needed.
July 2009
9-184
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Blank Cii'Wui
OrawulL Caption
Sea Salt
33.30
Figure 9-78. Percentage of aerosol optical depth in the GISS, left, based on Liu et al.
(2006,190422), provided by A. Lacis, GISS, and GFDL, right, from Ginoux et al. (2006,
190582). Models associated with the different components: S(h2~ (1st row), BC (2nd
row), 00 (3rd row), sea-salt (4th row), dust (5th row), and nitrate (last row). Nitrate not
available in GFDL model). Numbers on the GISS panels are global average, but on the
GFDL panels are maximum and minimum.
min-13 I Sulphate ADD Frartkm
ma* =95 9
rnln=OQO Sea Say AOD Fraction max^B.?
mirigt-S< OCjADD Fraction , rrtftx= 37.0
nun=0.9fc BC AOD Fraction max—19.6
rnwv»D 06 Dim AOD franrtpn. max BO,7
180 I2GW 6DW 0
July 2009
9-185
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Additional Considerations. Long wave aerosol forcing- So far only the aerosol
RF in the shortwave (solar) spectrum has been discussed. Figure 9"77 (right column)
shows that compared to the shortwave forcing, the values of anthropogenic aerosol
long wave (thermal) forcing in the GISS model are on the order of 10%. Like the
shortwave forcing, these values will also be affected by the particular aerosol
characteristics used in the simulation.
Aerosol vertical distribution-' Vertical distribution is particularly important for
absorbing aerosols, such as BC and dust in calculating the RF, particularly when
longwave forcing is considered (e.g., Figure 9-77) because the energy they reradiate
depends on the temperature (and hence altitude), which affects the calculated forcing
values. Several model inter-comparison studies have shown that the largest difference
among model simulated aerosol distributions is the vertical profile (e.g., Lohmann et
al., 2001, 190448; Penner et al., 2002, 190562; Textor et al., 2006, 190456)). due to the
significant diversities in atmospheric processes in the models (e.g., Table 9"12). In
addition, the vertical distribution also varies with space and time, as illustrated in
Figure 9"79 from the GISS ER simulations for January and July showing the most
probable altitude of aerosol vertical locations. In general, aerosols in the northern
hemisphere are located at lower altitudes in January than in July, and vice versa for
the southern hemisphere.
Mixing state-'Most climate model simulations incorporating different aerosol
types have been made using external mixtures, i.e., the evaluation of the aerosols and
their radiative properties are calculated separately for each aerosol type (assuming no
mixing between different components within individual particles). Observations
indicate that aerosols commonly consist of internally mixed particles, and these
"internal mixtures" can have very different radiative impacts. For example, the GISS"
1 (internal mixture) and GISS-2 (external mixture) model results shows very different
magnitude and sign of aerosol forcing from slightly positive (implying slight warming)
to strong negative (implying significant cooling) TOA forcing (Figure 9-72), due to
changes in both radiative properties of the mixtures, and in aerosol amount. The more
sophisticated aerosol mixtures from detailed microphysics calculations now being
used/developed by different modeling groups may well end up producing very different
direct (and indirect) forcing values.
Cloudy sky vs. clear sty-'The satellite or AERONET observations are all for clear
sky only because aerosol cannot be measured in the remote sensing technique when
clouds are present. However, almost all the model results are for all-sky because of
difficulty in extracting cloud-free scenes from the GCMs. So the AOD comparisons
discussed earlier are not completely consistent. Because AOD can be significantly
amplified when relative humidity is high, such as near or inside clouds, all-sky AOD
values are expected to be higher than clear sky AOD values. On the other hand, the
aerosol RF at TOA is significantly lower for all-sky than for clear sky conditions; the
IPCC AR4 and AeroCom RF study (Schulz et al., 2006, 190381) have shown that on
average the aerosol RF value for all-sky is about 1/3 of that for clear sky although
with large diversity (63%). These aspects illustrate the complexity of the system and
the difficulty of representing aerosol radiative influences in climate models whose
cloud and aerosol distributions are somewhat problematic. And of course aerosols in
cloudy regions can affect the clouds themselves, as discussed in Section 9.3.6.4.
July 2009
9-186
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
m i ; i i
100 360 420 480 540 400 660 720 780 540 900
Source: A. Lacis, GISS.
Figure 9-79. Most probable aerosol altitude (in pressure, hPa) from the GISS model in January (top)
and July (bottom).
9.3.6.6. Impacts of Aerosols on Climate Model Simulations
Surface Temperature Change. It was noted in the introduction that aerosol
cooling is essential in order for models to produce the observed global"temperature
rise over the last century, at least models with climate sensitivities in the range of 3°C
for doubled C02 (or ~0.759C;/(W/m2)) . The implications of this are discussed here in
somewhat more detail. Hansen et Si, (2007, 190597) show that in the CSlSS model,
well-mixed greenhouse gases produce a warming of close to 1°C between 1880 and the
present (Table !)-1 7). The direct effect of tropospheric aerosols as calculated in that
model produces cooling of close to "0.3°C between those same years, while the indirect
effect (represented in that study as cloud cover change) produces an additional cooling
of similar magnitude (note that the general model result quoted in IPOG AR4 is that
the indirect RF is twice that of the direct effect).
July 2009
9-187 DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table 9-17. Climate forcings (1880-2003) used to drive GISS climate simulations, along with the
surface air temperature changes obtained for several periods.
Forcing Agent
Forcing w M-2 (1880-2003)
AT Surface °C (yr to 2003)
Fi
Fa
Fs
Fe
1880
1900
1950
1979
Well-mixed GHGs
2.62
2.50
2.65
2.72
0.96
0.93
0.74
0.43
Stratospheric H2O
0.06
0.05
0.03
0.01
0.05
0.00
0s
0.44
0.28
0.26
0.23
0.p08
0.05
0.00
¦0.01
Land use
¦0.09
¦0.09
¦0.05
¦0.p07
¦0.04
¦0.02
Snow albedo
0.05
0.05
0.14
0.14
0.03
0.00
0.02
¦0.01
Solar irradiance
0.23
0.24
0.23
0.22
0.07
0.07
0.01
0.02
Stratospheric aerosols
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
¦0.08
¦0.03
¦0.06
0.04
Trop. aerosol direct forcing
¦0.41
¦0.38
¦0.52
¦0.60
¦0.28
¦0.23
¦0.18
¦0.10
Trop. aerosol indirect forcing
¦0.87
¦0.77
¦0.27
¦0.29
¦0.14
¦0.05
Sum of above
1.86
1.90
0.49
0.44
0.40
0.30
All forcings at once
1.77
1.75
0.53
0.61
0.44
0.29
Source: Hansen et al. (2007,190597). Instantaneous (/I), adjusted (fa), fixed SST (fs) and effective (fe) forcings are defined in Hansen et al. (2005,059087).
The time dependence of the total aerosol forcing used as well as the individual
species components is shown in Figure 9"80. The resultant warming, 0.53 (± 0.04) °C
including these and other forcings (Table 9-17), is less than the observed value of
0.6-0.7°C from 1880-2003. Hansen et al. (2007, 190597) further show that a reduction
in sulfate optical thickness and the direct aerosol effect by 50%, which also reduced
the aerosol indirect effect by 18%, produces a negative aerosol forcing from 1880-2003
of "0.91 W/m2 (down from "1.37 W/m2 with this revised forcing). The model now warms
0.75°C over that time. Hansen et al. (2007, 190597) defend this change by noting that
sulfate aerosol removal over North America and western Europe during the 1990s led
to a cleaner atmosphere. Note that the comparisons shown in the previous
section suggest that the GISS model already underestimates aerosol optical depths! it
is thus trends that are the issue here.
The magnitude of the indirect effect used by Hansen et al. (2005, 190596) is
roughly calibrated to reproduce the observed change in diurnal temperature cycle and
is consistent with some satellite observations. However, as Anderson et al. (2003,
054820) note, the forward calculation of aerosol negative forcing covers a much larger
range than is normally used in GCMsi the values chosen, as in this case, are
consistent with the inverse reasoning estimates of what is needed to produce the
observed warming, and hence generally consistent with current model climate
sensitivities. The authors justify this approach by claiming that paleoclimate data
indicate a climate sensitivity of close to 0.75 (± 0.25)°C/(W/m2), and therefore
something close to this magnitude of negative forcing is reasonable. Even this stated
range leaves significant uncertainty in climate sensitivity and the magnitude of the
aerosol negative forcing. Furthermore, IPCC (2007, 189430) concluded that
paleoclimate data are not capable of narrowing the range of climate sensitivity,
nominally 0.375-1.13 °C/(W/m2), because of uncertainties in paleoclimate forcing and
response! so from this perspective the total aerosol forcing is even less constrained
than the GISS estimate. Hansen et al. (2007, 190597) acknowledge that "an equally
good match to observations probably could be obtained from a model with larger
July 2009
9-188
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
sensitivity and smaller net forcing, or a model with smaller sensitivity and larger
forcing".
NiiTrnifS
Sulfa: pi
- RC Industrial
UC tJiomiis
OC InduarnaJ
OC fluoriasi
NiMBS
S«j Ifirc-s.
i«?4 1590 IKS (910
Sum ejf AJjiivn Anraxrjk
- Tbtt I
Sua Salt
Soili'Dua
— - BC laduacml
- - - SC. Btamaw
- OC Industrial
OC &OT1IS
Slack Carbon forcings
B.eil«set»vie Aerosol FortKvgs
Ali Aerosat?
Source: Hansen et al. (2007,190597).
Figure 9-80. Time dependence of aerosol optical thickness (left) and climate forcing (right). Note that
as specified, the aerosol trends are all "flat" from 1990-2000.
The GFDL model results for global mean ocean temperature change (down to
3 km depth) for the time period 186Q-20D0 is shown in Figure 9"81, along with the
different contributing factors (Delworth et al., 2005, 190055). This is the same GFDL
model whose aerosol distribution was discussed previously. The aerosol forcing
produces a cooling on the order of 50% that of greenhouse warming (generally similar
to that calculated by the GISS model, Table 9-17). Note that this was achieved
without any aerosol indirect effect .
The general model response noted by IPCO, as discussed in the introduction, was
that the total aerosol forcing of -1,3 W/m2 reduced the greenhouse forcing of near 3
W/m2 by about 45%, in the neighborhood of the GFDL and GISS forcings. Since the
average model sensitivity was close to 0.75 °C/(W/m2), similar to the sensitivities of
these models, the necessary negative forcing is therefore similar. The agreement
cannot therefore be used to validate the actual aerosol effect until climate sensitivity
itself is better known.
Is I here some way to distinguish between greenhouse gas and aerosol forcing that
would allow the observational record to indicate how much of each was really
occurring? This question of attribution has been the subject of numerous papers, and
the full scope of the discussion is beyond the range of this (OCSP SAP2.3) report. It
might be briefly noted that Zhang et al. (2006, 157722) using results from Several
climate models and incluchng both spatial and temporal patterns, found that the
climate responses to greenhouse gases and sulfate aerosols are correlated, and
separation is possible only occasionally, especially at global scales. This conclusion
appears to be both model and method"dependent^ using time-space distinctions as
opposed to trend detection may work differently in different models (Gillett et al.,
July 2009
9-189
DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
2002, 190576). Using multiple models helps primarily by providing larger-ensemble
sizes for statistics (Gillett at al., 2002. 190578). However, even separating between the
effects of different aerosol types is difficult, Jones et al. (2005, 155885) concluded that
currently the pattern of temperature change due to black carbon is indistinguishable
from the sulfate aerosol pattern. In contrast, Hansen et al, (2005, 059087) found that
absorbing aerosols produce a different global response than other forcings, and so may
be distinguishable , Overall, the similarity in response to all these very different
forcings is undoubtedly due to the importance of climate feedbacks in amplifying the
forcing, whatever its nature.
¦
fi£L lilHd IBSiti 1UL IrMJ «.J
Source: Delworth et al. (2005,190055).
Figure 9-81. Change in global mean ocean temperature (left axis) and ocean heat content (right axis)
for the top 3000 m due to different forcings in the GFDL model. WMGG includes all
greenhouse gases and ozone; NATURAL includes solar and volcanic aerosols (events
shown as green triangles on the bottom axis). Observed ocean heat content changes are
shown as well.
Distinctions in the climate response do appear to arise in the vertical, where
absorbing aerosols produce warming that is exhibited throughout the troposphere and
into the stratosphere, whereas reflective aerosols cool the troposphere but warm the
stratosphere (Hansen et al., 2005, 0590871 IPOfJ (intergovernmental Panel on
Climate, 2007, 190988). Delworth et al. (2005, 190055) noted I hat in the ocean, the
cooling effect of aerosols extended to greater depths, due to the thermal instability
associated with cooling the ocean surface, Hen.ce. the temperature response at.le.yels
both above and below the surface may provide an additional constraint on the
magnitudes of each of these forcings, as may the difference between Northern and
Southern Hemisphere changes UJ'< V et al., 2007, 189430. Chapter 9). The profile of
atmospheric temperature response will be useful to the extent that the vertical profile
of aerosol absorption, an important parameter to measure, is known.
Implications for Climate Model Simulations. The comparisons in Sections
9:3.6.2 and 9.3.6.3 suggest, that there are large differences in model calculated aerosol
distributions, mainly because of the large uncertainties in modeling the aerosol
atmospheric processes in addition to the uncertainties in emissions. The, fact that the
total optical depth is in better agreement between models than the individual
components means that even with similar optical depths, the aerosol direct forcing
effect can be quite different, as shown in the Aeroi \>m studies. Because the diversity
July 2009
9-190
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
among models and discrepancy between models and observations are much larger at
the regional level than in global average, the assessment of climate response (e.g.,
surface temperature change) to aerosol forcing would be more accurate for global
average than for regional or hemispheric differentiation. However, since aerosol
forcing is much more pronounced on regional than on global scales because of the
highly variable aerosol distributions, it is insufficient or even misleading to just get
the global average right. The indirect effect is strongly influenced by the aerosol
concentrations, size, type, mixing state, microphysical processes, and vertical profile.
As shown in previous sections, very large differences exist in those quantities even
among the models having similar AOD. Moreover, modeling aerosol indirect forcing
presents more challenges than direct forcing because there is so far no rigorous
observational data, especially on a global scale, that one can use to test the model
simulations. As seen in the comparisons of the GISS and GFDL model climate
simulations for IPCC AR4, aerosol indirect forcing was so poorly constrained that it
was completely ignored by one model (GFDL) but used by another (GISS) at a
magnitude that is more than half of the direct forcing, in order to reproduce the
observed surface temperature trends. A majority of the climate models used in IPCC
AR4 do not consider indirect effects; the ones that did were mostly limited to highly
simplified sulfate indirect effects (Table 9"16). Improvements must be made to at least
the degree that the aerosol indirect forcing can no longer be used to mask the
deficiencies in estimating the climate response to greenhouse gas and aerosol direct
RF.
9.3.6.7. Outstanding Issues
Clearly there are still large gaps in assessing the aerosol impacts on climate
through modeling. Major outstanding issues and prospects of improving model
simulations are discussed below.
Aerosol composition. Many global models are now able to simulate major
aerosol types such as sulfate, black carbon, and POM, dust, and sea salt, but only a
small fraction of these models simulate nitrate aerosols or consider anthropogenic
secondary organic aerosols. And it is difficult to quantify the dust emission from
human activities. As a result, the IPCC AR4 estimation of the nitrate and
anthropogenic dust TOA forcing was left with very large uncertainty. The next
generation of global models should therefore have a more comprehensive suite of
aerosol compositions with better-constrained anthropogenic sources.
Aerosol absorption. One of the most critical parameters in aerosol direct RF
and aerosol impact on hydrological cycles is the aerosol absorption. Most of the
absorption is from BC despite its small contribution to total aerosol short and long-
wave spectral ranges, whereas POM absorbs in the near UV. The aerosol absorption or
SSA, will have to be much better represented in the models through improving the
estimates of carbonaceous and dust aerosol sources, their atmospheric distributions,
and optical properties.
Aerosol indirect effects. The activation of aerosol particles into CCN depends
not only on particle size but chemical composition, with the relative importance of size
and composition unclear. In current aerosol-climate modeling, aerosol size distribution
is generally prescribed and simulations of aerosol composition have large
uncertainties. Therefore the model estimated "albedo effect" has large uncertainties.
How aerosol would influence cloud lifetime/ cover is still in debate. The influence of
aerosols on other aspects of the climate system, such as precipitation, is even more
uncertain, as are the physical processes involved. Processes that determine aerosol
size distributions, hygroscopic growth, mixing state, as well as CCN concentrations,
however, are inadequately represented in most of the global models. It will also be
difficult to improve the estimate of indirect effects until the models can produce more
realistic cloud characteristics.
July 2009
9-191
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Aerosol impacts on surface radiation and atmospheric heating.
Although these effects are well acknowledged to play roles in modulating atmospheric
circulation and water cycle, few coherent or comprehensive modeling studies have
focused on them, as compared to the efforts that have gone to assessing aerosol RF at
TOA. They have not yet been addressed in the previous IPCC reports. Here, of
particular importance is to improve the accuracy of aerosol absorption.
Long-term trends of aerosol. To assess the aerosol effects on climate change
the long-term variations of aerosol amount and composition and how they are related
to the emission trends in different regions have to be specified. Simulations of
historical aerosol trends can be problematic since historical emissions of aerosols have
shown large uncertainties—as information is difficult to obtain on past source types,
strengths, and even locations. The IPCC AR4 simulations used several alternative
aerosol emission histories, especially for BC and POM aerosols.
Climate modeling. Current aerosol simulation capabilities from CTMs have not
been fully implemented in most models used in IPCC AR4 climate simulations.
Instead, a majority employed simplified approaches to account for aerosol effects, to
the extent that aerosol representations in the GCMs, and the resulting forcing
estimates, are inadequate. The oversimplification occurs in part because the modeling
complexity and computing resource would be significantly increased if the full suite of
aerosols were fully coupled in the climate models.
Observational constraints. Model improvement has been hindered by a lack
of comprehensive datasets that could provide multiple constraints for the key
parameters simulated in the model. The extensive AOD coverage from satellite
observations and AERONET measurements has helped a great deal in validating
model-simulated AOD over the past decade, but further progress has been slow. Large
model diversities in aerosol composition, size, vertical distribution, and mixing state
are difficult to constrain, because of lack of reliable measurements with adequate
spatial and temporal coverage (see Chapter 2 of the CCSP SAP2.3).
Aerosol radiative forcing. Because of the large spatial and temporal
differences in aerosol sources, types, emission trends, compositions, and atmospheric
concentrations, anthropogenic aerosol RF has profound regional and seasonal
variations. So it is an insufficient measure of aerosol RF scientific understanding,
however useful, for models (or observation-derived products) to converge only on
globally and annually averaged TOARF values and accuracy. More emphasis should
be placed on regional and seasonal comparisons, and on climate effects in addition to
direct RF at TOA.
9.3.6.8. Conclusions
From forward modeling studies, as discussed in the IPCC (2007, 190988) , the
direct effect of aerosols since pre "industrial times has resulted in a negative RF of
about "0.5 ± 0.4 W/m2. The RF due to cloud albedo or brightness effect is estimated to
be "0.7 (-1.8 to -0.3) W/m2. Forcing of similar magnitude has been used in some
modeling studies for the effect associated with cloud lifetime, in lieu of the cloud
brightness influence. The total negative RF due to aerosols according to IPCC (2007,
190988) estimates is therefore -1.3 ("2.2 to -0.5) W/m2. With the inverse approach, in
which aerosols provide forcing necessary to produce the observed temperature change,
values range from -1.7 to "0.4 W/m2 (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate, 2007,
190988) . These results represent a substantial advance over previous assessments
(e.g., IPCC TAR), as the forward model estimated and inverse approach required
aerosol TOA forcing values are converging. However, large uncertainty ranges
preclude using the forcing and temperature records to more accurately determine
climate sensitivity.
There are now a few dozen models that simulate a comprehensive suite of
aerosols. This is done primarily in the CTMs. Model inter-comparison studies have
July 2009
9-192
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
shown that models have merged at matching the global annual averaged AOD
observed by satellite instruments, but they differ greatly in the relative amount of
individual components, in vertical distributions, and in optical properties. Because of
the great spatial and temporal variations of aerosol distributions, regional and
seasonal diversities are much larger than that of the global annual mean. Different
emissions and differences in atmospheric processes, such as transport, removal,
chemistry, and aerosol microphysics, are chiefly responsible for the spread among the
models. The varying component contributions then lead to differences in aerosol direct
RF, as aerosol scattering and absorption properties depend on aerosol size and type.
They also impact the calculated indirect RF, whose variations are further amplified by
the wide range of cloud and convective parameterizations in models. Currently, the
largest aerosol RF uncertainties are associated with the aerosol indirect effect. Most
climate models used for the IPCC AR4 simulations employed simplified approaches,
with aerosols specified from stand-alone CTM simulations. Despite the uncertainties
in aerosol RF and widely varying model climate sensitivity, the IPCC AR4 models
were generally able to reproduce the observed temperature record for the past
century. This is because models with lower/higher climate sensitivity generally used
less/more negative aerosol forcing to offset the greenhouse gas warming. An equally
good match to observed surface temperature change in the past could be obtained
from a model with larger climate sensitivity and smaller net forcing, or a model with
smaller sensitivity and larger forcing (Hansen et al., 2007, 190597). Obviously, both
greenhouse gases and aerosol effects have to be much better quantified in future
assessments.
Progress in better quantifying aerosol impacts on climate will only be made when
the capabilities of both aerosol observations and representation of aerosol processes in
models are improved. The primary concerns and issues discussed in this chapter of
the CCSP SAP2.3 include-
¦ Better representation of aerosol composition and absorption in the global models
¦ Improved theoretical understanding of subgrid-scale processes crucial to aerosol-cloud
interactions and lifetime
¦ Improved aerosol microphysics and cloud parameterizations
¦ Better understanding of aerosol effects on surface radiation and hydrological cycles
¦ More focused analysis on regional and seasonal variations of aerosols
¦ More reliable simulations of aerosol historic long-term trends
¦ More sophisticated climate model simulations with coupled aerosol and cloud processes
¦ Enhanced satellite observations of aerosol type, SSA, vertical distributions, and aerosol
radiative effect at TO A; more coordinated field experiments to provide constraints on
aerosol chemical, physical, and optical properties. Progress in better quantifying
aerosol impacts on climate will only be made when the capabilities of both aerosol
observations and representation of aerosol processes in models are improved.
9.3.7. Fire as a Special Source of PM Welfare Effects
Much interest has developed in defining more precisely the role of pyrogenic C in the
boreal C cycle. This is due to: (l) the resistance of pyrogenic C to decomposition! (2) its
influence on soil processes! and (3) the absorption of solar radiation by soot aerosols
(Preston and Schmidt, 2006, 156030).
Preston and Schmidt (2006, 156030) reviewed the current state of knowledge
regarding atmospheric emissions of pyrogenic C in the boreal zone. They considered
chemical structures, analytical methods, formation, characteristics in soil, loss
mechanisms, and longevity. Biomass is largely converted to gaseous forms during burning,
July 2009
9-193
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
but up to several percent is converted to pyrogenic C, and this includes charcoal and BC.
Charcoal is defined visually! BC is defined chemically by its resistance to oxidation in the
laboratory.
Andreae and Gelencser (2006, 156215) reviewed a different category of
light-absorbing carbon, referred to as brown carbon. Operational methods used to measure
all light-absorbing carbon are estimated to have a factor of 2 at present.
Within the boreal zone, fire is a critical driver of ecosystem process and nutrient
cycling (Hicke et al., 2003, 156545). For example, Bachelet et al. (2005, 156241) estimated
that 61% of the C gained in Alaska by primary production of boreal forests between 1922
and 1996 was lost to fire.
An updated modeling effort to evaluate the radiative effects of aerosols was presented
by Stier et al. (2007, 157012). Inclusion of refractive indices recommended by (2005,
155696) significantly increased aerosol RF and resulted in better agreement with
sun-photometer estimates. Although this stage of climate modeling improved the
representation of aerosols, large uncertainties remain regarding the effects of aerosol
mixing and aerosol-cloud interactions. Furthermore, Stier et al. (2007, 157012) emphasized
that these types of modeling efforts are dependent upon emission estimates that are likely
to vary by a factor of 2 or more.
One important reason for the acknowledged uncertainty in estimating global
emissions of carbonaceous aerosols is the influence of intermittent fires that can occur at
scales large enough to affect hemispheric aerosol concentrations. To better quantify the
effects of large-scale fire, Generoso et al. (2007, 155786) used satellite observations of boreal
fires in Russia in 2003 to evaluate the performance of a global chemistry and transport
model in simulating aerosol optical thickness, transport, and deposition. Emissions
estimates of BC and OC were adjusted in the model to better match satellite observations of
pollutant transport over the North Pacific. This resulted in an increase in optical thickness
and BC deposition by a factor of 2. The adjusted model estimated that the fires contributed
16-33% of the optical thickness and 40-56% of BC deposition north of 75° N in the spring
and summer of 2003.
Large fires also occurred over the Iberian Peninsula and Mediterranean coast during
2003. Ameso-scale atmospheric transport model was used with ground-based
measurements and satellite optical measurements to characterize the dispersion of emitted
smoke particles and quantify radiative effects across Europe (Hodzic et al., 2007, 156553).
July 2009
9-194
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
The modeled wildfire emissions resulted in increases in PM2.5 concentrations from 20 to
200%. The increased aerosol concentration was estimated to increase radiative forcing by
10-35 W/m2 during the period of strong fire influence. Absorption of radiation by BC was
also estimated to decrease rates of photolysis by 30%. In this simulation, all particles were
assumed to be internally mixed, and secondary aerosol formation was not considered.
Meteorological conditions in Europe during the exceptionally hot summer of 2003 were
linked to enhanced photochemically derived pollutants, increased wild fires, and elevated
aerosol concentrations in an analysis by (Vautard et al., 2007, 106012).
In addition to incidental fires, routine biomass burning, usually associated with
agriculture in eastern Europe, also has been shown to contribute to hemispheric
concentrations of carbonaceous aerosols. In the spring of 2006, the most severe air pollution
levels in the Arctic to date were recorded (Stohl et al., 2006, 156100). Atmospheric transport
modeling coupled with satellite fire detection data identified biomass burning for
agriculture as the primary cause of the high pollution levels. Concentrations of PM2.5
peaked during the pollution episode at values of an order of magnitude greater than those
recorded prior to the episode. The increased transport of pollution into the Arctic during
2006 was attributed to weather conditions that delayed preparations for crop planting into
May. Weather patterns favorable for pollutant transport into the Arctic were related to
unusually warm weather in late April and May, when the majority of agricultural biomass
burning took place that year.
In the summer of 2004, 2.7 million ha were burned by wildfire in Alaska and 3.1
million ha were burned in Canada. Effects on atmospheric air quality were measured
throughout the Arctic, although the concentrations of particulates varied considerably.
Aerosol optical depths were also increased at all measurement stations, which indicated
that the fires were likely to have had a significant effect on the atmospheric radiation
budget for the Arctic (Stohl et al., 2006, 156100). At one site, a pronounced drop in albedo
was observed due presumably to high deposition of light absorbing particulates on the snow
surface by the North American fires in 2004.
Investigations of the effects of large fires on climate forcing have typically focused on
the absorptive effects of BC. However, these fires also release large amounts of CO2 and
CH4, as well as light scattering compounds such as OC, and can enhance cloud formation.
These fires also increase radiative surface absorption through BC deposition on snow and
ice, and alter surface albedo and ecosystem energy budgets within the burn perimeter.
July 2009
9-195
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Randerson et al. (2006, 156038) estimated the net climate forcing of greenhouse gases,
aerosols, BC deposition on snow and ice and changes in albedo for the year subsequent to a
fire and for 80 yr in the future in interior Alaska. The net effect of the fire in the first year
was an increase in radiative forcing, but over the 80-yr recovery period, average net annual
radiative forcing was decreased by the fire.
9.3.8. Radiative Effects of Volcanic Aerosols
Section 9.3.8.1. comes directly from IPCC AR4 Chapter 2, Section 2.7.2, with section,
table, and figure numbers changed to be internally consistent with this ISA.
9.3.8.1. Explosive Volcanic Activity
Radiative Effects of Volcanic Aerosols. Volcanic sulfate aerosols are formed
as a result of oxidation of the sulfur gases emitted by explosive volcanic eruptions into
the stratosphere. The process of gas-to-particle conversion has an e-folding time of
roughly 35 days (Bluth et al., 1992, 192029; Read et al., 1993, 192031). The e-folding
time (by mass) for sedimentation of sulfate aerosols is typically about 12 to 14 months
(Baran and Foot, 1994, 192032; Barnes and Hofmann, 1997, 192044; Bluth et al.,
1997, 192045; Lambert et al., 1993, 192231). Also emitted directly during an eruption
are volcanic ash particulates (siliceous material). These are particles usually larger
than 2 jim that sediment out of the stratosphere fairly rapidly due to gravity (within
three months or so), but could also play a role in the radiative perturbations in the
immediate aftermath of an eruption. Stratospheric aerosol data incorporated for
climate change simulations tends to be mostly that of the sulfates (Ammann et al.,
2003, 192057; Hansen et al., 2002, 049177; Ramachandran et al., 2000, 192050; Sato
et al., 1993, 192046; Stenchikov et al., 1998, 192049; Tett et al., 2002, 192053). As
noted in the Second Assessment Report (SAR) and the TAR, explosive volcanic events
are episodic, but the stratospheric aerosols resulting from them yield substantial
transitory perturbations to the radiative energy balance of the planet, with both
shortwave and longwave effects sensitive to the microphysical characteristics of the
aerosols (e.g., size distribution).
Long-term ground-based and balloon-borne instrumental observations have
resulted in an understanding of the optical effects and microphysical evolution of
volcanic aerosols (Deshler et al., 2003, 192058; Hofmann et al., 2003, 192062).
Important groundbased observations of aerosol characteristics from pre-satellite era
spectral extinction measurements have been analysed by Stothers (2001, 192233;
2001, 192232). but they do not provide global coverage. Global observations of
stratospheric aerosol over the last 25 years have been possible owing to a number of
satellite platforms, for example, TOMS and TOVS have been used to estimate SO2
loadings from volcanic eruptions (Krueger et al., 2000, 192234; Prata et al., 2003,
192235). The Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE) and Stratospheric
Aerosol Measurement (SAM) projects (e.g., McCormick and Trepte, 1987, 192328)
have provided vertically resolved stratospheric aerosol spectral extinction data for
over 20 years, the longest such record. This data set has significant gaps in coverage
at the time of the El Chichon eruption in 1982 (the second most important in the 20th
century after Mt. Pinatubo in 1991) and when the aerosol cloud is dense; these gaps
have been partially filled by lidar measurements and field campaigns (e.g., Antuna et
al., 2003, 192251; Thomason and Peter, 2006, 192248).
July 2009
9-196
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Volcanic aerosols transported in the atmosphere to polar regions are preserved in
the ice sheets, thus recording the history of the Earth's volcanism for thousands of
years (Kruysse, 1971, 192236; Mosley-Thompson et al., 2003, 192255; Palmer et al.,
2002, 192319). However, the atmospheric loadings obtained from ice records suffer
from uncertainties due to imprecise knowledge of the latitudinal distribution of the
aerosols, depositional noise that can affect the signal for an individual eruption in a
single ice core, and poor constraints on aerosol microphysical properties. The best-
documented explosive volcanic event to date, by way of reliable and accurate
observations, is the 1991 eruption of Mt. Pinatubo. The growth and decay of aerosols
resulting from this eruption have provided a basis for modeling the RF due to
explosive volcanoes. There have been no explosive and climatically significant volcanic
events since Mt. Pinatubo. As pointed out in Ramaswamy et al. (2001, 156899).
stratospheric aerosol concentrations are now at the lowest concentrations since the
satellite era and global coverage began in about 1980. Altitude dependent
stratospheric optical observations at a few wavelengths, together with columnar
optical and physical measurements, have been used to construct the time-dependent
global field of stratospheric aerosol size distribution formed in the aftermath of
volcanic events. The wavelength "dependent stratospheric aerosol single-scattering
characteristics calculated for the solar and longwave spectrum are deployed in climate
models to account for the resulting radiative (shortwave plus longwave) perturbations.
Using available satellite- and ground-based observations, Hansen et al. (2002,
049177) constructed a volcanic aerosols data set for the 1850-1999 period (Sato et al.,
1993, 192046). This has yielded zonal mean vertically resolved aerosol optical depths
for visible wavelengths and column average effective radii. Stenchikov et al. (2006,
192260) introduced a slight variation to this data set, employing UARS observations
to modify the effective radii relative to Hansen et al. (2002, 049177). thus accounting
for variations with altitude. Ammann et al. (2003, 192057) developed a data set of
total aerosol optical depth for the period since 1890 that does not include the
Krakatau eruption. The data set is based on empirical estimates of atmospheric
loadings, which are then globally distributed using a simplified parameterization of
atmospheric transport, and employs a fixed aerosol effective radius (0.42 ]im) for
calculating optical properties. The above data sets have essentially provided the bases
for the volcanic aerosols implemented in virtually all of the models that have
performed the 20th-century climate integrations (Stenchikov et al., 2006, 192260).
Relative to Sato et al. (1993, 192046). the Ammann et al. (2003, 192057) estimate
yields a larger value of the optical depth, by 20 to 30% in the second part of the 20th
century, and by 50% for eruptions at the end of 19th and beginning of 20th century, for
example, the 1902 Santa Maria eruption (Figure 9"82).
The global mean RF calculated using the Sato et al. (1993, 192046) data yields a
peak in radiative perturbation of about "3 W/m2 for the strong (rated in terms of
emitted SO2) 1860 and 1991 eruptions of Krakatau andMt. Pinatubo, respectively.
The value is reduced to about "2 W/m2 for the relatively less intense El Chichon and
Agung eruptions (Hansen et al., 2002, 049177). As expected from the arguments
above, Ammann's RF is roughly 20 to 30% larger than Sato's RF.
Not all features of the aerosols are well quantified, and extending and improving
the data sets remains an important area of research. This includes improved
estimates of the aerosol size parameters (Bingen et al., 2004, 192262). a new approach
for calculating aerosol optical characteristics using SAGE and UARS data (Bauman et
al., 2003, 192265). and intercomparison of data from different satellites and
combining them to fill gaps (Randall et al., 2001, 192268). While the aerosol
characteristics are better constrained for the Mt. Pinatubo eruption, and to some extent
for the El Chichon and Agung eruptions, the reliability degrades for aerosols from
explosive volcanic events further back in time as there are few, if any, observational
constraints on their optical depth and size evolution.
The radiative effects due to volcanic aerosols from major eruptions are manifest
in the global mean anomaly of reflected solar radiation; this variable affords a good
July 2009
9-197
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
estimate of radiative effects that can actually be tested against observations.
However, unlike RF, this variable contains effects due to feedbacks (e.g., changes in
cloud distributions) so that it is actually more a signature of the climate response. In
the case of the Mt, Pinal ubo eruption, with apeak global visible optical depth of about
0,18, simulations yield a large negative perturbation as noted above of about -3 W/m2
(Hansen et al., 2002, 049177; Ramachandran et al.. 2:000, 192050) (see also Section 9.2
of the IPCO AR4), This modeled estimate of reflected solar radiation compares
reasonably with Kli'lJS observations (Minnis et al., 1993, 190539). However, the ERBS
observations were for a relatively short duration, and the model-observation
comparisons are likely affected by differing cloud effects in simulations and
measurements, It is interesting to note (Stenchikov et al. , 2006.. 192260) that, in the
Mt, Pinatubo case, the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) models that use
the Sato et al. (1993, 192046) data: yield an even greater solar reflection than the
National Qenter for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) model that uses the larger
(Ammann jgfe al., 2003, 192057) opt ical depth estimate.
0.2 <
0.18-
o.ia-
0.1
£ 0.12-
O.
<3
o M-
§
o"0.oe-
0.06-
0.04-
0.02-
0^
Figure 9-82. Visible (wavelength 0.55 Dm) optical depth estimates of stratospheric SO*2" aerosols
formed in the aftermath of explosive volcanic eruptions that occurred between 1860 and
2000. Results are shown from two different data sets that have been used in recent
climate model integrations. Note that the Ammann et al. (2003,192057) data begins in
1890.
Volcanic Aerosol Total Visible Optical Depth
Sato et al. (1993)
Ammann et al. (2003)
1870 1880 1800 1000 1010 1020 1030 1040 1090 1060 1970 1900 1W0
Time (years)
July 2009
9-198
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Thermal, Dynamical and Chemistry Perturbations Forced by Volcanic
Aerosols. Four distinct mechanisms have been invoked with regards to the climate
response to volcanic aerosol RF. First, these forcings can directly affect the Earth's
radiative balance and thus alter surface temperature. Second, they introduce
horizontal and vertical heating gradients; these can alter the stratospheric
circulation, in turn affecting the troposphere. Third, the forcings can interact with
internal climate system variability (e.g., El Nino-Southern Oscillation, North Atlantic
Oscillation, Quasi" Biennial Oscillation) and dynamical noise, thereby triggering,
amplifying or shifting these modes (see Section 9.2 of the IPCC AR4) (Yang and
Schlesinger, 2001, 192270; Stenchikov et al., 2004, 192274). Fourth, volcanic aerosols
provide surfaces for heterogeneous chemistry affecting global stratospheric ozone
distributions (Chipperfield et al., 2003, 192275) and perturbing other trace gases for a
considerable period following an eruption. Each of the above mechanisms has its own
spatial and temporal response pattern. In addition, the mechanisms could depend on
the background state of the climate system, and thus on other forcings (e.g., due to
well-mixe d gases) (Meehl et al., 2004, 192279). or interact with each other.
The complexity of radiative "dynamical response forced by volcanic impacts
suggests that it is important to calculate aerosol radiative effects interactively within
the model rather than prescribe them (Andronova et al., 1999, 192286; Broccoli et al.,
2003, 192283). Despite differences in volcanic aerosol parameters employed, models
computing the aerosol radiative effects interactively yield tropical and global mean
lower-stratospheric warmings that are fairly consistent with each other and with
observations (Ramachandran et al., 2000, 192050; Hansen et al., 2002, 049177; Yang
and Schlesinger, 2001, 192270; Stenchikov et al., 2004, 192274; Ramaswamy et al.,
2006, 192284); however, there is a considerable range in the responses in the polar
stratosphere and troposphere. The global mean warming of the lower stratosphere is
due mainly to aerosol effects in the longwave spectrum, in contrast to the flux changes
at the TOAthat are essentially due to aerosol effects in the solar spectrum. The net
radiative effects of volcanic aerosols on the thermal and hydrologic balance (e.g.,
surface temperature and moisture) have been highlighted by recent studies (Free and
Angell, 2002, 192281; Jones et al., 2003, 192278) (see Chapter 6 of the IPCC AR4). See
Chapter 9 (of the IPCC AR4) for significance of the simulated responses and model-
observation comparisons for 20th-century eruptions. A mechanism closely linked to
the optical depth perturbation and ensuing warming of the tropical lower stratosphere
is the potential change in the cross-tropopause water vapour flux (Joshi and Shine,
2003, 192327) (see Section 2.3.7 of the IPCC AR4).
Anomalies in the volcanic-aerosol induced global radiative heating distribution
can force significant changes in atmospheric circulation, for example, perturbing the
equator-to-pole heating gradient (Ramaswamy et al., 2006, 192273; Stenchikov et al.,
2002, 192277) (see Section 9.2 of the IPCC AR4) and forcing a positive phase of the
Arctic Oscillation that in turn causes a counterintuitive boreal winter warming at
middle and high latitudes over Eurasia and North America (Miller et al., 2005,
192258; Perlwitz and Graf, 2001, 192271; Perlwitz and Harnik, 2003, 192264; Rind et
al., 2005, 192261; Shin dell et al., 2003, 192069; Shindell et al., 2004, 192267;
Stenchikov et al., 2002, 192277; Stenchikov et al., 2004, 192274; Stenchikov et al.,
2006, 192260).
Stratospheric aerosols affect the chemistry and transport processes in the
stratosphere, resulting in the depletion of ozone (Brasseur and Granier, 1992, 192256;
Chipperfield et al., 2003, 192275; Solomon et al., 1996, 192252; Tie et al., 1994,
192253). Stenchikov et al. (2002, 192277) demonstrated a link between ozone
depletion and Arctic Oscillation response; this is essentially a secondary radiative
mechanism induced by volcanic aerosols through stratospheric chemistry.
Stratospheric cooling in the polar region associated with a stronger polar vortex
initiated by volcanic effects can increase the probability of formation of polar
stratospheric clouds and therefore enhance the rate of heterogeneous chemical
destruction of stratospheric ozone, especially in the NH (Tabazadeh et al., 2002,
July 2009
9-199
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
192250). The above studies indicate effects on the stratospheric ozone layer in the
wake of a volcanic eruption and under conditions of enhanced anthropogenic halogen
loading. Interactive microphysics-chemistry-climate models (Dameris et al., 2005,
192238; Rozanov et al., 2002, 192247; Rozanov et al., 2004, 192245; Shindell et al.,
2003, 192069; Timmreck et al., 2003, 192254) indicate that aerosol-induced
stratospheric heating affects the dispersion of the volcanic aerosol cloud, thus
affecting the spatial RF. However the models' simplified treatment of aerosol
microphysics introduces biases; further, they usually overestimate the mixing at the
tropopause level and intensity of meridional transport in the stratosphere (Douglass
et al., 2003, 057260; Schoeberl et al., 2003, 057262). For present climate studies, it is
practical to utilize simpler approaches that are reliably constrained by aerosol
observations.
Because of its episodic and transitory nature, it is difficult to give a best estimate
for the volcanic RF, unlike the other agents. Neither a best estimate nor a level of
scientific understanding was given in the TAR. For the well-documented case of the
explosive 1991 Mt. Pinatubo eruption, there is a good scientific understanding.
However, the limited knowledge of the RF associated with prior episodic, explosive
events indicates a low level of scientific understanding.
9.3.9. Other Special Sources and Effects
International shipping has been identified as an additional source of carbonaceous
aerosols. Simulations with a climate model that included aerosol effects and 3 different
emissions inventories showed that shipping contributed 2.3-3.6% of the total S( ) r
atmospheric aerosol content and 0.4-1.4% of the total BC atmospheric aerosol content,
based on global means in 2000. This modeling also showed that aerosol optical thickness
over the Indian Ocean, the Gulf of Mexico, and the northeastern Pacific Ocean varied by 8
to 10%. The corresponding all-sky (that includes both cloudy and clear skies) direct
radiative forcings ranged from -0.011 W/m2 to -0.013 W/m2. The greatest effect of aerosols
emitted from global shipping is likely to be an increase in cloud formation and the resulting
change in reflectivity of shortwave radiation. Aerosols from shipping were estimated to
contribute 17-39% of the total anthropogenic aerosol radiation forcing effect.
When BC is deposited to the surface of ice or snow, solar absorption and heating occur
at the surface. This can melt additional snow or ice at the surface and the reflectivity of the
surface can change. Both factors affect aspects of climate. Jacobson (2003, 155866; 2004,
155870) and Jacobson et al. (2004, 180362) estimated the warming due to fossil fuel BC and
organic matter using the Gas, Aerosol, Transport, Radiation, General Circulation,
Mesoscale and Ocean Model (GATOR-GCMOM). The modeling effort included consideration
of the BC cycle, accounting for emissions, transport, aerosol coagulation, aerosol growth,
cloud activation, aerosol-cloud coagulation, cloud-cloud coagulation, rainout, washout, dry
deposition, and processes of precipitated and dry-deposited BC in snow and sea ice. Results
July 2009
9-200
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
suggested that BC absorption in snow and sea ice increased near-surface temperatures over
a 10-yr simulation by about 0.06°K (Jacobson, 2003, 189421).
BC soot is a potentially important agent of climate warming in the Arctic, and
northern boreal wildfires may contribute substantially to this effect. Soot is approximately
twice as effective as CO2 in altering surface air temperature, and can reduce sea ice
formation and snow albedo (Hansen and Nazarenko, 2004, 156521).
Kim et al. (2005, 155900) investigated the relationships between northern boreal
wildfires and reductions in Arctic sea ice and glacial coverage. They modeled the
FROSTFIRE boreal forest control burn (Hinzman et al., 2003, 155845) with respect to BC
aerosol transport, dispersion, and deposition. Model results suggested that boreal wildfires
could be a major source of BC soot to sea ice and glaciers in Alaska. This may exacerbate
summer melting of sea ice and reduce recruitment of first-year ice into multiyear ice,
thereby leading to an overall reduction in sea ice. Similarly, increased BC soot on glaciers
would be expected to increase summer melting and lead to an overall reduction in glacial
coverage (Kim et al., 2005, 155900).
Jacobson (2002, 155865) proposed, based on model simulations with 12 identifiable
effects of aerosol particles on climate, emission reductions of fossil fuel particulate BC and
associated organic matter could potentially slow warming for a specific period more than
reduction of CO2 or CH4 for a specific period. Jacobson's (2006, 156599) calculations
suggested that fossil fuel BC plus organic matter emissions reductions could eliminate 8 to
18% of total anthropogenic warming, and 20 to 45% of net warming after accounting for
aerosol cooling, within a period of 3-5 yr (Chock et al., 2003, 155727). See also conflicting
discussions (Feichter et al., 2003, 155772; Penner, 2003, 156851); and further responses
(Jacobson, 2003, 155867; Jacobson, 2003, 155868; Jacobson, 2003, 155869; Penner, 2003,
156851).
Bond and Sun (2005, 156282) reviewed published data regarding the warming
potential of BC, compared with CO2 and other GHG. Climatic effects of GHG are generally
compared on the basis of top-of-the-atmosphere, globally averaged changes in radiative
balance. On that basis, BC is one of the largest individual warming agents, after CO2 and
perhaps CH4 (Bond and Sun, 2005, 156282; Jacobson, 2000, 056378; Sato et al., 2003,
156947).
Reddy and Boucher (2007, 156042) conducted an analysis that provided regional
estimates of BC emissions from fossil fuels andbiofuels. These estimates indicated that
July 2009
9-201
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
East and Southeast Asia contributed over 50% of the global BC burden and its associated
direct radiative forcing. Europe was found to be the largest BC contributor in the northern
latitudes. The indirect effect of BC deposition on snow was also estimated to be highest for
Europe.
To improve understanding of the role of aerosols in climate forcing, Chung and
Seinfeld (2002, 155732) estimated the global distribution of BC, primary organic particles
(those directly emitted from combustion), secondary organic particles (primary organic
compounds partially oxidized in the atmosphere), and SOr aerosols to model the overall
radiative forcing of these groups of compounds. The model was run with the assumption
that the BC particles do not combine with OC or SO r particles (termed an external
mixture), and with the assumption that the particles are represented by a core of BC
surrounded by a shell of light scattering aerosols. Modeling results suggested an overall
radiative cooling effect from aerosols ranging from -0.39 to "0.78 W/m2.
Roberts and Jones (2004, 156052) used a climate modeling approach to compare
possible effects of BC on climate warming to those attributable to emissions from
greenhouse gases. Results suggested that the warming effect from atmospheric BC aerosols
may not be large relative to that from greenhouse gases. A different modeling approach by
Roeckner et al. (2006, 156920) evaluated the effects of BC and primary OC on climate
under two scenarios of carbonaceous aerosol emissions. In the first scenario, BC and
primary OC emissions decreased over Europe and China, but increased at lower latitudes.
In the second scenario, emissions were frozen at 2000 levels. The effects of both scenarios
on mean global temperature were found to be small, but higher aerosol emissions at low
latitudes did result in atmospheric heating and corresponding land surface cooling that led
to increased precipitation and runoff in this simulation.
Study of BC effects in tropical climates was undertaken by Wang (2007, 156147).
Substantial effects of direct radiative forcing by BC on the tropical Pacific were shown in
model results that were similar to the El Nino Southern Oscillation activities both in the
nature and scale of effects with enhancement of the Indian monsoon circulation. The model
suggested that atmospheric heating by radiation absorption by BC can form temperature
and pressure anomalies that favor propagation of convection from western to central and
eastern Pacific. More work will be needed to distinguish between the aerosol signal and
natural factors in controlling tropical precipitation in this region.
July 2009
9-202
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table 9-18.
Overview of the different aerosol indirect effects and their sign of the net radiative flux
change at the top of the atmosphere (TOA).
Effect
Cloud Types
Affected
Process
Sign of Change in
TOA Radiation
Potential
Magnitude
Scientific
Understanding
Cloud albedo
effect
All clouds
For the same cloud water or ice content more but smaller cloud
particles reflect more solar radiation
Negative
Medium
Low
Cloud lifetime
effect
All clouds
Smaller cloud particles decrease the precipitation efficiency
thereby presumably prolonging cloud lifetime
Negative
Medium
Very low
Semi-direct effect
All clouds
Absorption of solar radiation by absorbing aerosols affects static
stability and the surface energy budget, and may lead to an
evaporation of cloud particles
Positive or Negative
Small
Very low
Glaciation indirect
effect
Mixed-phase
clouds
An increase in IN increases the precipitation efficiency
Positive
Medium
Very low
Thermodynamic
effect
Mixed-phase
clouds
Smaller cloud droplets delay freezing causing super-cooled clouds
to extend to colder temperatures
Positive or Negative
Medium
Very low
Source: Denman (2007,156394)
Table 9-19. Overview of the different aerosol indirect effects and their implications for the global
mean net shortwave radiation of the surface Fsfc (columns 2-4) and for precipitation
(columns 5-7).
Effect
Sign of Change
in Fsfc
Potential
Magnitude
Scientific
Understanding
Sign of Change in
Precipitation
Potential
Magnitude
Scientific
Understanding
Cloud albedo effect
Negative
Medium
Low
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
Cloud lifetime effect
Negative
Medium
Very low
Negative
Small
Very low
Semi-direct effect
Negative
Large
Very low
Negative
Large
Very low
Glaciation indirect
effect
Positive
Medium
Very low
Positive
Medium
Very low
Thermodynamic
effect
Positive or Negative
Medium
Very low
Positive or Negative
Medium
Very low
Source: Denman (2007,156394)
There are several other kinds of climate effects from aerosol PM. None is well
understood or well quantified. The semi-direct effect, which involves absorption of solar
radiation by soot particles followed by re-emission as thermal radiation, is expected to heat
the air mass and increase its static stability relative to the surface. The semi-direct effect
can also cause evaporation of cloud droplets, thereby partially offsetting the cloud albedo
indirect effect. The glaciation effect involves an increase in IN, which is expected to cause
rapid glaciation of a super-cooled liquid water cloud due to the differences in vapor pressure
over ice and water. Unlike cloud droplets, these ice crystals can quickly reach precipitation
size, with the potential to turn a non-precipitating cloud into a precipitating cloud. The
thermodynamic effect involves a delay in freezing by the smaller cloud droplets, which can
July 2009
9-203
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
cause super cooled clouds to occur under colder temperatures. The possible consequences to
radiative flux of all of the processes are outlined in Table 9-18 (top of the atmosphere
effects) and Table 9-19 (surface radiative and precipitation effects) (Denman et al., 2007,
156394), though significant uncertainties remain. Nevertheless, the individual processes
cannot be considered in isolation because of the numerous feedbacks, and because
atmospheric aerosol concentrations and climate are intimately coupled (Denman et al.,
2007, 156394; Dentener et al., 2006, 088434).
9.3.9.1. Glaciers and Snowpack
Organic compounds are incorporated into snow by wet and dry deposition processes
(Lei and Wania, 2004, 127880; Roth et al., 2004, 056431). Atmospherically deposited
organics appear to be ubiquitous in snowpacks at appreciable concentrations (Grannas et
al., 2007, 156492). Examples include PAHs, phthalates, alkanes, phenols, low molecular
weight carbonyls, POPs, and low molecular weight organic acids (Halsall, 2004, 155822;
Nakamura et al., 2000, 156792; Villa et al., 2003, 156139). Humic-like substances found in
the snowpack may release VOCs into the atmosphere via photo-oxidation (Grannas et al.,
2004, 155803; Grannas et al., 2007, 156492). Several thousand organic species were
identified by Grannas et al. (2006, 155804), based on molecular weight, from a single ice
core collected in Russia. Little information is available, however, regarding the chemical
properties of these chemical constituents. In addition to the diversity of chemicals that are
deposited into the snowpack, there are also biological organisms, including bacteria and
algae. Their role in influencing snow chemistry and volatilization processes is not
understood (Grannas et al., 2007, 156492).
Recent research has explored connections between the atmosphere and the cryosphere
(land or sea covered by snow or ice). A seasonal maximum of 40% of the Earth's land surface
is covered by snow or ice, as well as several percent of the oceans. Particulate deposition to
snow and ice surfaces can affect melting rates. Deposition of PM to glacial ice surfaces can
affect the subsequent rate of melting. A thin cover of debris contributes to accelerated
melting. A thicker cover of debris, such as may result from a volcanic eruption, retards
melting. The difference is due to the changing balance between enhanced absorption of
shortwave radiation by PM and conductive heat flow (insulation) through a buildup of
material having low heat conduction (Kirkbride and Dugmore, 2003, 156645).This issue is
particularly important for deposition of large quantities of volcanic material. To a lesser
July 2009
9-204
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
extent, however, the same principles apply to PM deposition derived from air pollution.
Under a thin layer of debris, ablation rates are higher than for clean ice. However, as the
thickness of the debris layer increases, ablation rates systematically decline (Nicholson and
Benn, 2006, 156806). The threshold debris thickness that separates ablation increase from
decrease is site specific and depends on local climate and the nature of the debris particles.
Nicholson and Benn (2006, 156806) presented a surface energy balance model to calculate
ice melt beneath a surface debris layer, based on meteorological data and basic debris
characteristics. Modeled melting rates matched observed rates, suggesting that the model
produced useful results.
Long-range atmospheric transport of PM delivers a large fraction of the total input of
POPs to the Arctic region (Halsall, 2004, 155822). These contaminants can accumulate in
Arctic food webs and have become the focus of international research and concern.
Nevertheless, fate and transport of POPs within terrestrial and marine Arctic ecosystems
are not well understood and are strongly affected by the presence of snow and ice. Sea ice
provides a barrier to air-water exchange, and this hinders volatilization and re-emission of
previously deposited contaminants (Halsall, 2004, 155822). Thus, the effects of greenhouse
gasses and PM on climate in the Arctic region have feedbacks to POP fate, transport, and
toxicity. The transfer of POPs among the major abiotic environmental compartments in the
Arctic are summarized in Figure 9-83 from Halsall (2004, 155822). Recent studies detailing
rate and transport of POPs are summarized in Table 9-20.
Table 9-20. Recent studies highlighting POP occurrence and fate in the major arctic
compartments.
ATMOSPHERE
1
Annual time-series of 0C and PCB concentrations in the Norwegian Arctic
Oehme et al. (1996,156001)
2
Long-term analysis of the chlordane-group and their input to the Arctic with changing sources
Bidleman et al. (2002,155691)
3
PAH occurrence at monitoring sites across the Arctic, seasonality and gas/particle partitioning
Halsall et al. (1997,155821)
4
PCB occurrence at monitoring sites across the Arctic, spatial differences and seasonality
Stern et al. (1997,156096)
5
Long-term analysis of PCB and 0C trends in the Canadian Arctic and seasonal patterns
Hung et al. (2001,155856; 2002,155857)
6
Trans-Pacific LRAT and impact of Asian sources on the western Canadian Arctic
Bailey et al. (2000,155670)
FRESHWATER
1
Annual avg water concentrations in major Russian rivers for selected 0C pesticides
Alexeeva et al. (2001,155651)
8
Long-term (decades) PCB deposition profile in Arctic lake sediments
Muir et al. (1996,155991)
9
Mass balance of selected OCs in Canadian Arctic lake conducted with data collected over 3 yrs
Helm et al. (2002,155835)
10
Examining the biodegradation of HCHs in Canadian Arctic watersheds
Helm et al. (2000,155834)
July 2009
9-205
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
ATMOSPHERE
MARINE
11
Transport and entry of p-HCH into western Arctic Ocean via Pacific surface waters
Li etal. (2002,156691)
12
Occurrence of current use pesticides in air, fog and surface seawater in the western Arctic Ocean
Chermyak et al. (1996,155726)
13
Resolving petrogenic and anthropogenic PAH input to marine sediments in coastal Arctic seas
Yunkeretal. (1996,156175)
14
Quantifying abiotic and biotic degradation of HCHs in the Arctic Ocean water column
Harneret al. (2000,155829)
15
PCBs and OCs in surface ocean water-Bering and Chukchi seas
Strachan et al. (2001,156103)
16
Spatial patterns of HCHs and toxaphene in Arctic Ocean surface water
Jantunen and Bidleman (1998,155877)
SNOW/AIR FRESHWA TER
17
PAHs (and inorganics) in surface snow layers (snowpit) at Summit, Greenland
Masclet et al. (2000,155966)
18
PAHs measured in snow and ice layers on Agassiz ice cap, Ellesmere Island, Canada
Peters et al. (1995,156856)
19
Modeling OC behaviour and fate in the surface seasonal snow pack at Amituk Lake, Canada
Wania et al. (1998,156148)
20
OCs, PCBs and PAHs in snow and ice of the Ob-Yenisey watershed of the Russian Arctic
Melnikov et al. (2003,156753)
OCEAN/AIR
21
Transfer of a-HCH across the air/water interface in the western Arctic ocean
Jantunen and Bidleman (1996,155876)
22
Calculated seasonality of OC air/water fluxes in the Canadian high Arctic
Hargrave et al. (1997,155827)
OCEAN/ICE
23
Transport potential of contaminants across the Arctic ocean via sea-ice drift
Pfirman et al. (1997,156864)
24
The importance of eastern Arctic sea-ice drift as a source of contaminants to the Norwegian sea
Korsneset al. (2002,156657)
Source: Halsall (2004,155822)
July 2009
9-206
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Atmosphere
LRAT
(21-22)
(19)
LROT
Snow/sea ice
Snow/ice caps
Terrestrial (20)
Catchment <7-1 O)
(11-16) JL?
Surface
Ocean nA
rivers
Deep Ocean
Figure 9-83. The transfer of POPs between the major abiotic compartments of the Arctic. Shaded
arrows represent inputs/outputs of POPs to the Arctic. The numbers refer to selected
studies detailing the occurrence and behavior of POPs, and are listed in Table 9-20.
Question marks represent those areas that are least well understood. LRAT-long range
atmospheric transport; LROT - long range oceanic transport.
9.3.9.2. Radiative Forcing by Anthropogenic Surface Albedo Change: BC in Snow and
Ice
Section 9.3.9.2. comes directly from IPCC AR4 Chapter 2, Section 2.5.4, with section,
table, and figure numbers changed to be internally consistent with this ISA.
The presence of soot particles in snow could cause a decrease in the albedo of
snow and affect snowmelt. Initial estimates by Hansen et al. (2000, 042683) suggested
that BC could thereby exert a positive RF of +0.2 W/m2. This estimate was refined by
Hansen and Nazarenko (2004, 156521). who used measured BC concentrations within
snow and ice at a wide range of geographic locations to deduce the perturbation to the
surface and planetary albedo, deriving an RF of +0.15 W/m2. The uncertainty in this
estimate is substantial due to uncertainties in whether BC and snow particles are
internally or externally mixed, in BC and snow particle shapes and sizes, in voids
within BC particles, and in the BC imaginary refractive index. Jacobson (2004,
155870) developed a global model that allows the BC aerosol to enter snow via
precipitation and dry deposition, thereby modifying the snow albedo and emissivity.
They found modeled concentrations of BC within snow that were in reasonable
agreement with those from many observations. The model study found that BC on
snow and sea ice caused a decrease in the surface albedo of 0.4% globally and 1% in
July 2009 9-207 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
the NH, although RFs were not reported. Hansen et al. (2005, 059087) allowed the
albedo change to be proportional to local BC deposition according to Koch (2001,
192054) and presented a further revised estimate of 0.08 W/m2. They also suggested
that this RF mechanism produces a greater temperature response by a factor of 1.7
than an equivalent C02 RF, that is, the 'efficacy' may be higher for this RF mechanism
(see Section 2.8.5.7 of the IPCC AR4). This report adopt s a best estimate for the BC on
snow RF of +0.10 ± 0.10 W/m2, with a low level of scientific understanding
(Section 2.9, Table 2.11, of the IPCC AR4).
9.3.9.3. Effects on Local and Regional Climate
Most effects of PM on climate, as assessed by IPCC (Stohl et al., 2007, 157015) and
summarized in this assessment, focus on global-scale processes and responses. In addition,
it is also possible that PM emissions contribute to local and regional climate changes. These
might include short-term cycles in rainfall or temperature and rainfall suppression,
especially near cities and for orographic precipitation. Rainfall suppression, in particular, is
believed to exacerbate water supply problems which are substantial in many regions,
especially in the western U.S.
Aerosol particles, directly and through cloud enhancement, may reduce near-surface
wind speeds locally. Slower winds, in turn, reduce evaporation. The overall impact can be a
reduction in local precipitation. Jacobson and Kaufman (2006, 090942) investigated the
effects of PM on spatially-distributed wind speeds and resulting feedbacks to precipitation
using the GATOR-GCMOM (Jacobson, 2001, 155864) and supporting evidence from satellite
data. The study focused on the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) in California during
February and August, 2002-2004. The modeled precipitation decrease over land in
California was 2% of the baseline 1.5 mm/day due to emissions of anthropogenic aerosol
particle and precursor gasses in the SCAB domain. However, the reduction over much of
the Sierra Nevada, where most precipitation falls, was up to 0.5 mm/day, or 4 to 5% of the
baseline 10 to 13 mm/day in that mountainous region (Jacobson, 2006, 156599). The
probable mechanism was described as follows. Aerosol particles and aerosol-enhanced
clouds reduce wind speeds below them by stabilizing the air, reducing the vertical transport
of horizontal momentum. In turn, the reduced wind speeds, and associated reduced
evaporation and increased cloud lifetime, contributes to reduced local and regional
precipitation (Jacobson, 2006, 156599).
Effects of air pollution on regional precipitation were quantified by Givati and
Rosenfeld (2004, 156475). They found a 15-25% reduction in the orographic component of
precipitation downwind of major coastal urban areas during the 20th century. Their study
focused on orographically-forced clouds because these short-lived, shallow clouds are
July 2009
9-208
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
expected to exhibit the largest effect of air pollution on precipitation. Substantially larger
precipitation suppression due to aerosol particulate pollution was found between Fresno
and Sacramento in California by Givati and Rosenfeld (2004, 156475). Precipitation losses
over topographical barriers in the Sierra Nevada amounted to 15%-25% of the annual
precipitation at elevations less than 2,000 m. This precipitation suppression occurred
mainly in the relatively shallow orographic clouds within the cold air mass of cyclones. The
suppression that occurred on the upslope side of the mountains was coupled with similar
percentage (but lower absolute volume) enhancement on the drier downslope eastern side
(Givati and Rosenfeld, 2004, 156475). Similar results were found in studies by Griffith et al.
(2005, 156497), Jirak and Cotton (2006, 156612), Rosenfeld and Givati (2006, 156924), and
Rosenfeld et al. (2007, 156057). At all of these study locations (California, Israel, Utah,
Colorado, China), orographic precipitation decreased by 15-30% downwind of pollution
sources, likely due to creation of more and smaller cloud droplets and resulting suppression
of precipitation.
The study of Givati and Rosenfeld (2004, 156475) was the first to quantify the
microphysical effect of mesoscale precipitation. Following the findings of Givati and
Rosenfeld (2004, 156475), the effects of aerosol air pollution on precipitation at high
elevation sites in the Front Range of Colorado adjacent to urban areas were investigated by
Jirak and Cotton (2006, 156612). Examination of precipitation trends showed that the ratio
of upslope precipitation during easterly flows at high elevation west of Denver and Colorado
Springs to the upwind urban sites decreased by about 30% over the past half century. These
results provide further support for the hypothesis that aerosol pollution suppresses
orographic precipitation downwind of pollution source areas.
Griffith et al. (2005, 156497) found similar reductions in mountainous precipitation in
Utah, downwind of Salt Lake City and Provo. The ratio of precipitation at mountain
stations located in rural settings in Utah and Nevada remained stable, supporting the
hypothesis that air pollution decreases Ro (the ratio of precipitation at the downwind site to
precipitation at the upwind pollution source) over the mountains to the east of Salt Lake
City.
Rosenfeld and Givati (2006, 156924) extended the investigation of the suppression of
precipitation by aerosol pollutants to a larger scale by examining the ratio between
precipitation amounts over the hills to precipitation over upwind lowland areas throughout
the western U.S. from the Pacific Coast to the Rocky Mountains. They found in these paired
July 2009
9-209
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
analyses a pattern of decreasing precipitation by as much as 24% from the Mexican border
to central California, with no decrease in northern California and Oregon and smaller
decrease of 14% in Washington east of Seattle and Puget Sound. Similar decreases were
found over Arizona and New Mexico (Rosenfeld, 2006, 190233), Utah (Griffith et al., 2005,
156497), and the east slope of the Colorado Rockies (Jirak and Cotton, 2006, 156612).
Suppression of winter orographic precipitation appears to occur up to hundreds of
kilometers inland of coastal urban areas (Rosenfeld, 2006, 190233). Decreases in this
precipitation ratio occurred during winter orographic precipitation, but not during
convective summer precipitation over the same mountain ranges. This finding agrees with
the expectation that aerosol-induced changes in the rate of precipitation formation would
cause a decrease in precipitation from shallow and short-lived orographic clouds, but not
necessarily from deeper and longer-lived thermally-driven convective clouds.
Results of these studies of aerosol effects on orographic precipitation suggest that
human-caused air pollution, and fine particles in particular, have had a large effect on
precipitation well beyond the local scales of the pollution sources (Rosenfeld, 2006, 190233).
9.3.10. Summary of Effects on Climate
Aerosols affect climate through direct and indirect effects. The direct effect is
primarily realized as planet brightening when seen from space because most aerosols
scatter most of the visible spectrum light that reaches them. The IPCC AR4 reported that
the radiative forcing from this direct effect was -0.5 (±0.4) W/m2 and identified the level of
scientific understanding of this effect as 'Medium-low'. The global mean direct radiative
forcing from individual aerosol components varies from strongly negative for S( ) r to
positive for BC with weaker positive or negative effects for other components, all of which
can vary strongly over space and time and with aerosol size. The indirect effects are
primarily realized as an increase in cloud brightness (termed the "first indirect" or
"Twomey" effect), changes in precipitation, and possible changes in cloud lifetime. The IPCC
AR4 reported that the radiative forcing from the Twomey effect was -0.7 (range: -1.1 to +4)
and identified the level of scientific understanding of this effect as "Low'". The other
indirect effects from aerosols were not considered to be radiative-forcing.
Taken together, direct and indirect effects from aerosols increase Earth's shortwave
albedo or reflectance, thereby reducing the radiative flux reaching Earth's surface from the
Sun. This produces net climate cooling from aerosols. The current scientific consensus
July 2009
9-210
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
reported by IPCC AIM is that the direct and indirect radiative forcing from anthropogenic
aerosols computed at the top of the atmosphere, on a global average, is about -1.3 (range: -
2.2 to -0.5) W/m2. Although the magnitude of this negative radiative forcing appears large
in comparison to the analogous IPCC AIM estimate of positive radiative forcing from
anthropogenic GHG of about 2.9 (±0.3) W/m2, the spatial and temporal distributions of
these two very different radiative forcing agents are dissimilar! therefore, they do not
simply cancel and regional differences can be large. These differences result from the much
shorter atmospheric lifetime of aerosols than for the radiatively important trace gases,
implying that the radiative effects of aerosols respond much more quickly to changes in
emissions than do the effects from the gas-phase forcing agents Moreover, the effect of
present-day aerosols is to cool Earth's surface but, on average, to heat the atmosphere
itself within the atmospheric column, the radiative forcing effect from aerosols is estimated
to range from +0.8 to +2 W/m2.
Considerable progress has been made with in situ and remotely-sensed aerosols
concentrations including the MODIS, MISR, POLDER, and OMI satellite instruments! see
the discussion in Section 3.4.1.6. The accuracy for aerosol optical depth (AOD) measured
with these global-coverage remote sensing instruments is on the order of 0.05 or 20% of the
AOD, but is still much lower than for the limited-area surface-based sun photometers
which have accuracy in the range of 0.01-0.02. The differences remaining between surface
and remotely sensed AOD and between estimates computed from measurements and from
numerical model predictions are important because AOD is a significant element in
determining radiative forcing. Hence, uncertainty and error in AOD measurements and
modeling propagate into the range of estimates for total radiative forcing reported here.
Numerical modeling of aerosol effects on climate has also sustained remarkable
progress since the 2004 PM AQCD (EPA, 2004, 056905), though model solutions still
display large heterogeneity in their estimation of the direct radiative forcing effect from
anthropogenic aerosols. Differences among models are due in large measure to differences
in: emissions of PM and precursors to secondary PM formation! in the representation of
aerosol microphysical and optical processes! in regional- and global-scale transport and
transformation; as well as in the effects of aerosol radiative forcing. The clear-sky direct
radiative forcing over ocean due to anthropogenic aerosols is estimated from satellite
instruments to be on the order of -1.1 (±0.37) W/m2 while model estimates are -0.6 W/m2.
The models' low bias over ocean is carried through for the global average: global average
July 2009
9-211
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
direct radiative forcing from anthropogenic aerosols is estimated from measurements to
range from -0.9 to -1.9 W/m2, larger than the estimate of -0.8 W/m2 from the models. Spatial
heterogeneity in radiative forcing is expected to exert significant effects on regional climate,
but because the effects of climate warming and cooling are not strictly co-located spatially
or temporally with radiative forcing or with emissions in particular for precursors for
secondary PM formation, assessments of effects for sub-global domains are even more
uncertain than the global averages reported here.
Overall, the evidence is sufficient to conclude that a causal relationship exists between
PM and effects on climate, including both direct effects on radiative forcing and indirect effects
that involve cloud feedbacks that influence precipitation formation and cloud lifetimes.
9.4. Ecological Effects of PM
9.4.1. Introduction
PM is heterogeneous with respect to chemical composition and size, therefore it can
cause a variety of ecological effects, which have been previously described by the U.S. EPA
(2004, 056905) and by Grantz et al. (2003, 155805). Atmospheric PM has been defined, for
regulatory purposes, mainly by size fractions and less clearly so in terms of chemical
nature, structure, or source. Both fine and coarse-mode particles may affect plants and
other organisms, however PM size classes do not necessarily relate to ecological effects
(U.S. EPA, 1996, 079380). More often the chemical constituents drive the ecosystem
response to PM (Grantz et al., 2003, 155805).
The previous PM assessment (U.S. EPA, 2004, 056905) included the acidifying effects
of particulate N and S. The2008 NOxSOx ISA (U.S. EPA, 2008, 157074) assessed the effects
of particle- and gas-phase N and S pollution on acidification, N enrichment, and Hg
methylation. Acidification of ecosystems is driven primarily by deposition resulting from
SOx, NOx, and NHx pollution. Acidification from the deposition resulting from current
emission levels causes a cascade of effects that harm susceptible aquatic and terrestrial
ecosystems, including slower growth and injury to forests and localized extinction of fishes
and other aquatic species. In addition to acidification, atmospheric deposition of reactive N
resulting from current NOx and NHx emissions along with other non-atmospheric sources
(e.g., fertilizers and wastewater), causes a suite of ecological changes within sensitive
July 2009
9-212
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
ecosystems. These include increased primary productivity in most N-limited ecosystems,
biodiversity losses, changes in C cycling, and eutrophication and harmful algal blooms in
freshwater, estuarine, and ocean ecosystems. In some watersheds, additional S042~from
atmospheric deposition increases Hg methylation rates by increasing both the number and
activity of S-reducing bacteria. Methylmercury is a powerful toxin that can bioaccumulated
to toxic amounts in food webs at higher trophic levels. Effects of particulate metals and
organics on ecosystems and ecosystem receptors are the focus in this PM ISA.
This assessment of PM effects on ecosystems considers both direct and indirect
exposure pathways. Atmospheric PM may affect ecological receptors directly following
deposition on surfaces or indirectly by changing the soil chemistry or by changing the
amount of radiation reaching the Earth's surface. Indirect effects acting through the soil
are often thought to be most significant because they can alter nutrient cycling and inhibit
nutrient uptake (EPA, 2004, 056905). The U.S. EPA (2004, 056905) reported that the effects
of PM can be both chemical and physical. Physical effects of particle deposition on
vegetation may include abrasion and radiative heating. Chemical effects may be more
significant (U.S. EPA, 2008, 157074).
In general, anthropogenic stressors can result in damaged ecosystems that do not
recover readily (Odum, 1993, 076742; Rapport and Whitford, 1999, 004595). Ecosystems
sometimes lack the capacity to adapt to an anthropogenic stress and are unable to maintain
their normal structure and functions unless the stressor is removed (Rapport and Whitford,
1999, 004595). These stresses result in a process of ecosystem degradation marked by a
decrease in biodiversity, reduced primary and secondary production, and a lower capacity to
recover and return to the original ecosystem state. In addition, there can be an increased
prevalence of disease, reduced nutrient cycling, increased dominance of exotic species, and
increased dominance by smaller, short-lived opportunistic species (Odum, 1985, 039482;
Rapport and Whitford, 1999, 004595).
Ecosystems are often subjected to multiple stressors, of which atmospheric PM
deposition is only one. Additional stressors are also important, including O3 exposure,
climatic variation, natural and human disturbance, the occurrence of invasive non-native
plants, native and non-native insect pests, disease, acidification, and eutrophication among
others. PM deposition interacts with these other stressors to affect ecosystem patterns and
processes.
July 2009
9-213
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
The possible effects of particulate (and other) air pollutants on ecosystems have been
categorized by Guderian (1977, 004150) as follows:
¦ accumulation of pollutants in plants and other ecosystem components (such as soil
and surface- and groundwater),
¦ damage to consumers as a result of pollutant accumulation,
¦ changes in species diversity because of shifts in competition,
¦ disruption of biogeochemical cycles,
¦ disruption of stability and reduction in the ability to self-regulate,
¦ breakdown of stands and associations, and
¦ expansion of denuded zones.
The general conclusion of the last PM assessment (U.S. EPA, 2004, 056905) was that
ecosystem response to PM can be difficult to determine because the changes are often
subtle. For example, changes in the soil may not be observed until pollutant deposition has
occurred for many decades, except in the most severely polluted areas around heavily
industrialized point sources. The presence of co-occurring pollutants generally makes it
difficult to attribute ecological effects to PM alone or to one constituent in the deposited
PM. In other words, the potential for alteration of ecosystem function and structure exists
but can be difficult to quantify except in cases of extreme amounts of deposition, especially
when there are other pollutants present in the ambient air that may produce additive or
synergistic responses.
New information on the ecological effects of coarse and fine particle PM is presented
in the following discussion in the context of effects that were known from the last PM
AQCD (EPA, 2004, 056905). The general effects of the chemical constituents of PM are
discussed; however, a rigorous assessment of each chemical constituent (e.g., Hg, Cd, Pb,
etc.) is not given. Both direct and indirect effects will be discussed and the strength of the
scientific evidence will be evaluated using the causality framework.
July 2009
9-214
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
9.4.1.1. Ecosystem Scale, Function, and Structure
Information presented in this section was collected at multiple scales, ranging from
the physiology of a given species to population, community, and ecosystem-level
investigations. For this assessment, "ecosystem" is defined as a functional entity consisting
of interacting groups of living organisms and their abiotic (chemical and physical)
environment. Ecosystems cover a hierarchy of spatial scales and can comprise the entire
globe, biomes at the continental scale, or small, well-circumscribed systems such as a small
pond.
Ecosystems have both structure and function. Structure may refer to a variety of
measurements including the species richness, abundance, community composition and
biodiversity as well as landscape attributes. Competition among and within species and
their tolerance to environmental stresses are key elements of survivorship. When
environmental conditions are shifted, for example, by the presence of anthropogenic air
pollution, these competitive relationships may change and tolerance to stress may be
exceeded. "Function" refers to the suite of processes and interactions among the ecosystem
components and their environment that involve nutrient and energy flow as well as other
attributes including water dynamics and the flux of trace gases. Plant processes including
photosynthesis, nutrient uptake, respiration, and C allocation, are directly related to
functions of energy flow and nutrient cycling. The energy accumulated and stored by
vegetation (via photosynthetic C capture) is available to other organisms. Energy moves
from one organism to another through food webs, until it is ultimately released as heat.
Nutrients and water can be recycled. Air pollution alters the function of ecosystems when
elemental cycles or the energy flow are altered. This alteration can also be manifested in
changes in the biotic composition of ecosystems.
There are at least three levels of ecosystem response to pollutant deposition: (l) the
individual organism and its environment! (2) the population and its environment! and (3)
the biological community composed of many species and their environment (Billings, 1978,
034165). Individual organisms within a population vary in their ability to withstand the
stress of environmental change. The response of individual organisms within a population
is based on their genetic constitution, stage of growth at time of exposure to stress, and the
microhabitat in which they are growing (Levine and Pinto, 1998, 029599). The range within
which organisms can exist and function determines the ability of the population to survive.
Those able to cope with the stresses survive and reproduce. Competition among different
July 2009
9-215
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
species results in succession (community change over time) and, ultimately, produces
ecosystems composed of populations of species that have the capability to tolerate the
stresses (Guderian R, 1985, 019325; Rapport and Whitford, 1999, 004595). Available
information on individual, population and community response to PM will be discussed.
9.4.1.2. Ecosystem Services
Ecosystem structure and function may be translated into ecosystem services.
Ecosystem services identify the varied and numerous ways that ecosystems are important
to human welfare. Ecosystems provide many goods and services that are of vital importance
for the functioning of the biosphere and provide the basis for the delivery of tangible
benefits to human society. Hassan et al. (2005, 092759) define these to include supporting,
provisioning, regulating, and cultural services^
¦ Supporting services are necessary for the production of all other ecosystem services.
Some examples include biomass production, production of atmospheric O2, soil
formation and retention, nutrient cycling, water cycling, and provisioning of habitat.
Biodiversity is a supporting service that is increasingly recognized to sustain many
of the goods and services that humans enjoy from ecosystems. These provide a basis
for three higher-level categories of services.
¦ Provisioning services, such as products (Gitay et al., 2001, 092761), i.e., food
(including game, roots, seeds, nuts and other fruit, spices, fodder), fiber (including
wood, textiles), and medicinal and cosmetic products (including aromatic plants,
pigments).
¦ Regulating services that are of paramount importance for human society such as (a)
C sequestration, (b) climate and water regulation, (c) protection from natural
hazards such as floods, avalanches, or rock-fall, (d) water and air purification, and
(e) disease and pest regulation.
¦ Cultural services that satisfy human spiritual and aesthetic appreciation of
ecosystems and their components.
July 2009
9-216
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
9.4.2. Deposition of PM
Deposition of PM is discussed in Chapter 3.3.3. Additional material specifically
related to ecosystems is discussed in this section.
9.4.2.1. Forms of Deposition
Research summarized by the previous NAAQS PM assessment illustrated the
complexity of deposition processes. Airborne particles, their gas-phase precursors, and their
transformation products are removed from the atmosphere by wet and dry deposition
processes. These deposition processes transfer PM pollutants to other environmental media
where they can alter the structure, function, diversity, and sustainability of complex
ecosystems. Dry deposition of PM is most effective for coarse particles. These include
primary geologic materials and elements such as iron and manganese. By contrast, wet
deposition is more effective for fine particles of secondary atmospheric origin and elements
such as cadmium, chromium, lead, nickel, and vanadium (Reisinger, 1990, 046737; Smith,
1990, 084015; U.S. EPA, 2004, 056905). The relative magnitudes of the different deposition
modes vary with ecosystem type, location, elevation, and chemical burden of the
atmosphere (U.S. EPA, 2004, 056905). There are differences in the deposition behavior of
fine and coarse particles. Coarse particles generally settle nearer their site of formation
than do fine particles. In addition, the chemical constitution of individual particles is
correlated with size. For example, much of the base cation and heavy metal burden is
present on coarse particles.
Fine PM is often a secondary pollutant that forms within the atmosphere, rather than
being directly emitted from a pollution source. It derives from atmospheric gas-to-particle
conversion reactions involving nucleation, condensation, and coagulation, and from
evaporation of water from contaminated fog and cloud droplets. Fine PM may also contain
condensates of VOCs, volatilized metals, and products of incomplete combustion, including
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and BC (soot) (EPA, 2004, 056905).
Fine PM may act as a carrier for materials such as herbicides that are phytotoxic.
Fine PM provides much of the surface area of particles suspended in the atmosphere,
whereas coarse PM provides much of the mass of airborne particles. Surface area can
influence ecological effects associated with the oxidizing capacity of fine particles, their
interactions with other pollutants, and their adsorption of organic compounds. Fine and
July 2009
9-217
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
coarse particles also respond to changes in atmospheric humidity, precipitation, and wind,
and these can alter their deposition characteristics.
Coarse PM is mainly a primary pollutant, having been emitted from pollution sources
as fully formed particles derived from abrasion and crushing processes, soil disturbances,
desiccation of marine aerosol emitted from bursting bubbles, hygroscopic fine PM
expanding with humidity to coarse mode, and/or gas condensation directly onto preexisting
coarse particles. Suspended primary coarse PM may contain iron, silica, aluminum, and
base cations from soil, plant and insect fragments, pollen, fungal spores, bacteria, and
viruses, as well as fly ash, brake lining particles, and automobile tire fragments. Coarse
mode particles can be altered by chemical reactions and/or physical interactions with
gaseous or liquid contaminants.
Exposure to a given mass concentration of PM may lead to widely differing phytotoxic
and other environmental outcomes depending upon the particular mix of PM constituents
involved. Especially important in this regard are S and N components of PM, which are
addressed in the 2008 NOxSOx ISA, and effects of particulate heavy metals and organic
contaminants. This variability has not been characterized adequately. Though effects of
specific chemical fractions of PM have been described to some extent, there has been
relatively little research aimed at defining the effects of unspeciated PM on plants or
ecosystems.
9.4.2.2. Components of PM Deposition
Trace Metals
Atmospheric deposition can be the primary source of some metals to some watersheds.
Metal inputs can include the primary crustal elements (Al, Ca, K, Fe, Mg, Si, Ti) and the
primary anthropogenic elements (Cu, Zn, Cd, Cr, Mn, Pb, V, Hg). The crustal elements are
derived largely from weathering and erosion, whereas the anthropogenic elements are
derived from combustion, industrial sources, and other man-made sources (Goforth and
Christoforou, 2006, 088353).
Heavy metal deposition to ecosystems depends on their location as well as upwind
emissions source strength. The deposition velocity tends to be dependent on particle size
and chemical species. Larger particles deposit more efficiently than smaller particles.
Heavy metals preferentially associate with fine particles. Fine particles also have the
July 2009
9-218
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
longest atmospheric residence times. Depending on climate and topography, fine particles
may remain airborne for days to months and may be transported thousands of kilometers
from their source.
Ecosystems immediately downwind of major heavy metal emissions sources may
receive locally heavy dry deposition. Trace element investigations conducted in roadside,
industrial, and urban environments have also shown that substantial amounts of
particulate heavy metals can accumulate on surfaces.
A significant trace metal component of PM is mercury (Hg). Mercury is toxic and can
move readily through environmental compartments. Atmospheric and depositional inputs of
Hg include both natural and anthropogenic sources. Natural geologic contributions to Hg in
the environment include geothermal and volcanic activity, geologic metal deposits, and
organic-rich sedimentary rocks. These natural emissions combine with anthropogenic
emissions from such sources as power plants, landfills, sewage sludge, mine waste, and
incineration (Gustin, 2003, 155816; Schroeder and Munthe, 1998, 014559). Emissions from
natural sources are controlled by geologic features, including substrate Hg content, rock
type, the degree of hydrothermal activity, and the presence of heat sources (Gustin, 2003,
155816). The significance of natural Hg sources relative to anthropogenic sources varies
geographically. For example, Nevada occurs within a global mercuriferous belt, with area
emissions about three times higher than the value assumed for global modeling (Gustin,
2003, 155816). In Nevada, natural and anthropogenic Hg emissions are approximately
equal (Gustin, 2003, 155816).
The U.S. EPA (1997, 157066) compiled an assessment of the sources and
environmental effects of Hg in the U.S. A variety of factors were found to influence Hg
deposition, fate and transport (Table l). Such factors relate in particular to speciation of the
Hg that is emitted, the forms in which it is deposited from the atmosphere, and
transformations that occur within the atmosphere and within the aquatic, transitional, and
terrestrial compartments of the receiving watershed. There have been studies that have
reconstructed, from lake sediment records, the atmospheric depositional history of trace
metals and PAHs in lakes adjacent to coal-fired power plants. For example, Donahue et al.
(2006, 155751) analyzed sediment from Wababun Lake, which is located in Alberta, Canada
in proximity (within 35 km) to 4 power plants built since 1950. Trace metal concentrations
of Hg, Cu, Pb, As, and Se in lake sediment increased by 1.2- to 4-fold. The total PAH flux to
surface sediments was 730 to 1100 pg/m2/yr, which was two to five times higher than in 2
July 2009
9-219
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
lakes situated 20 km to the north and 70 km to the south. Further discussion of Hg effects
on ecosystems can be found in Section 9.4.5.
Table 9-21. Factors potentially important in estimating mercury exposure.
Factor Importance and Possible Effect on Mercury Exposure
Type of anthropogenic source of mercury
Different combustion and industrial process sources are anticipated to have different local scale impacts due to
physical source characteristics (e.g., stack height), the method of waste generation (e.g., incineration or mass burn) or
mercury control devices and their effectiveness.
Mercury emission rates from stack
Increased emissions will result in a greater chance of adverse impacts on environment.
Mercury species emitted from stack
More soluble species will tend to deposit closer to the source.
Form of mercury emitted from stack Transport properties can be highly dependent on form.
Deposition differences between vapor and Vapor-phase forms may deposit significantly faster than particulate-bound forms,
particulate-bound mercury
Transformations of mercury after emission from Relatively nontoxic forms emitted from source may be transformed into more toxic compounds,
source
Transformation of mercury in watershed soil Reduction and revolatilization of mercury in soil limits the buildup of concentration.
Transport of mercury from watershed soils to water Mercury in watershed soils can be a significant source to water bodies and subsequently to fish,
body
Transformation of mercury in water body Reduction, methylation, and demethylation of mercury in water bodies affect the overall concentration and the MHg
fraction, which is bioaccumulated in fish.
Facility locations Effects of meteorology and terrain may be significant.
Location relative to local mercury source Receptors located downwind are more likely to have higher exposures. Influence of distance depends on source type.
Contribution from non local sources of mercury Important to keep predicted impacts of local sources in perspective.
Uncertainty Reduces confidence in ability to estimate exposure accurately.
Source: Modified from U.S. EPA (1997,157066)
Organics
Organic compounds that may be associated with deposited PM include persistent
organic pollutants (POPs), pesticides, SOCs, polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and flame
retardants among others. Organic compounds partition between gas and particle phases,
and organic particulate deposition depends largely on the particle sizes available for
adsorption (EPA, 2004, 056905). Dry deposition of organic materials is often dominated by
the coarse fraction. Gas-particle phase interconversions are important in determining the
amount of dry deposition.
Most persistent organic pollutants (POPs) enter the biosphere via human activities,
including synthetic pesticide application, output of polychlorinated dibenzo dioxins (PCDD)
from incinerators, and accidental release of PCBs from transformers (Lee, 2006, 088968).
Once they are introduced into the environment, their accumulation and magnification in
biological systems are determined by physiochemical properties and environmental
July 2009
9-220
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
conditions (Section 9.4.5.7). Uptake by plants can occur at the soil/plant interface and at the
air/plant interface. For lipophilic POPs, such as PCDDs and PCBs, the air/plant response
route generally dominates (Lee, 2006, 088968; Thomas et al., 1998, 156118), but uptake
through above-ground plant tissue also occurs. In a study of zucchini (Cucurbitapepo), Lee
et al. (2006, 088968) found chlordane pesticide components in all vegetation tissues
examined: root, stem, leaves, fruits.
Many pesticides and SOCs are carcinogenic or estrogenic and pose potential threats to
aquatic and terrestrial biota. Although deposition of SOCs was previously reported for the
Sierra Nevada Mountains in California and the Rocky Mountains in Colorado, little was
previously known about the occurrence, distribution, or sources of SOCs in alpine,
sub-Arctic, and Arctic ecosystems in the western U.S. The snowpack is efficient at
scavenging of both particulate and gas phase pesticides from the atmosphere (Halsall, 2004,
155822; Lei and Wania, 2004, 127880). Analysis of pesticides in snowpack samples from
seven national parks in the western U.S. by Hageman et al. (2006, 156509) illustrated the
deposition and fate of 47 pesticides and their degradation products. Correlation analysis
with latitude, temperature, elevation, PM, and two indicators of regional pesticide use
suggested that regional patterns in historic and current agricultural practices are largely
responsible for the distribution of pesticides in the national parks. Pesticide deposition to
parks in Alaska was attributed to long-range atmospheric transport.
PAHs include hundreds of different compounds that are characterized by possessing
two or more fused benzene rings. They are widespread contaminants in the environment,
and are formed by incomplete combustion of fossil fuels and other organic materials. Eight
PAHs are considered carcinogenic and 16 are classified by EPA as priority pollutants. They
are common air pollutants in metropolitan areas, derived from vehicular traffic and other
urban sources. Especially high concentrations have been found near Soderberg aluminum
production industries and areas where wood heating during winter is common. Other
sources, in addition to gasoline and diesel engines, include forest fires and various forms of
fossil fuel combustion (Sanderson and Farant, 2004, 156942).
The behavior of PAHs is strongly determined by their chemical characteristics,
especially their nonpolarity and hydrophobicity. They readily adsorb to particulates in the
air and to sediments in water. Srogi (2007, 180049) provided a thorough review of PAH
concentrations in various environmental compartments and their use for assessing
environmental risks and possible effects on ecosystems and human health.
July 2009
9-221
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Deposition and fate of PAH has been an important area of research. Because they are
carcinogenic, PAHs are important environmental contaminants. Root-soil behavior of PAHs
is an area of active study. Soil-bound PAHs are associated with soil organic matter and are
therefore generally not easily available for root uptake. PAHs are readily adsorbed to root
surfaces but there seems to be little movement to the interior of the root or movement up to
the shoots (Gao and Zhu, 2004, 155782). Paddy rice is the main food crop planted in China.
As an aquatic plant having aerial roots, the movement of PAHs into rice roots may be
different than their movement into more widely studied land-grown food crops. PAH
concentrations in the rice roots were more correlated with the water and air compartments
than with the soil (Jiao et al., 2007, 155879).
The total PAH concentration in grasses adjacent to a highway have been measured to
be about eight times higher than in grasses from reference sites not close to a highway
(Crepineau et al., 2003, 155741). Howe et al. (2004, 155854) found that concentrations of
PAHs and hexachlorobenzene (HCB) in spruce (Picea spp.) needles at 36 sites in eastern
Alaska varied by an order of magnitude. Samples collected near the city of Fairbanks
generally had higher concentrations than samples collected from rural areas. The relative
importance of combustion sources versus petrogenic sources was highest in the near-coastal
areas, as reflected in variation in the concentration of ratios of isomeric PAHs.
Use of flame retardants has increased in recent years in response to fire product
safety regulations. However, some flame retardant chemicals are toxic and are readily
transported atmospherically. Use of some has been banned in Europe and some of the
United States because of their persistence and tendency to bioaccumulate (Hoh et al., 2006,
190378).
Base Cations
With respect to ecosystem effects from PM deposition, the inclusion of base cations
(especially Ca, Mg, and K) in atmospheric deposition is generally considered to be a positive
effect. Base cations are important plant nutrients that are in some locations present in
short supply and that are further depleted by the acidic components of deposition.
Increased base cation deposition can help to ameliorate adverse effects of acidification of
soils and surface waters and reduce the toxicity of inorganic Al to plant roots and aquatic
biota. These topics are covered in detail in the recent 2000 NOxSOx ISA (U.S. EPA, 2008,
157074). Calcium supply is also well known to be important for breeding success in
July 2009
9-222
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
passerine bird species. Eggshell thickness, egg size, clutch size, and hatchability of pied
flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) were found to be depressed near the Cu smelter at
Harjavalta, SW Finland (Eeva and Lehikoinen, 2004, 155762). Availability of Ca-rich food
to the birds was estimated by counting snail shells in the nests postfledging. The number of
snail shells correlated positively with the Ca concentration of nestling feces and adult
breeding success. In addition, the negative impact of Cu on the number of fledglings was
stronger at locations where Ca concentration was low (Eeva and Lehikoinen, 2004, 155762).
Although the effects of base cation deposition inputs to terrestrial ecosystems are
most commonly considered to be positive, under very high base cation deposition, plant
health can be adversely affected. Dust that is high in base cations can settle on leaves and
other plant structures and remain for extended periods of time. This is especially likely in
arid environments because rainfall can serve to wash dry deposited materials off the
foliage. Extended dust coverage can result in a variety of adverse impacts on plant
physiology (Grantz et al., 2003, 155805). For example, van Heerden et al. (2007, 156131)
documented decreased chlorophyll content, inhibition of CO2 assimilation, and uncoupling
of the oxygen-evolving complex in desert shrubs exposed to high limestone dust deposition
near a limestone quarry in Namibia.
Based on the Integrated Forest Study (IFS) data, the U.S. EPA (2004, 056905)
concluded that particulate deposition has a greater effect on base cation inputs to soils than
on base cation losses associated with the inputs of sulfur, nitrogen, and H+. These
atmospheric inputs of base cations have considerable significance, not only to the base
cation status of these ecosystems, but also to the potential of incoming precipitation to
acidify or alkalize the soils in these ecosystems. This topic is discussed in detail in the
recent NOxSOx ISA (U.S. EPA, 2008, 157074).
9.4.2.3. Magnitude of Dry Deposition
Using Vegetation for Estimating Atmospheric Deposition
Whereas direct real-time measurement of deposition or air concentrations of
atmospheric contaminants is desirable, it is not always practical (Howe et al., 2004,
155854). Instead, passive time-integrative methods are frequently used. These can involve
analysis of vegetative tissues as a record of pollutant exposure, or analysis of lake sediment
cores or ice cores to determine changes in pollutant input over time. There is a general
July 2009
9-223
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
assumption that the concentration of an analyte in vegetation reflects the time-integrated
concentration of that analyte in the air. The development of deposition layers in sediment
or ice cores allows the possibility of determining the effects of changes in the atmospheric
concentration over periods of years, decades, or longer.
Biomonitoring methods are important in air pollution assessment and provide a
complement for more typical instrumental analyses. It is well known that mosses can
accumulate large amounts of heavy metals in response to atmospheric deposition. Mosses
accumulate dissolved materials and PM deposited from the atmosphere and have been used
extensively in Europe as surrogate collectors for estimating bulk (wet plus dry) deposition
of metals. The ease and low cost of this method has enabled regional assessments to be
conducted throughout Europe.
Despite its wide use, however, several papers have pointed out complications in the
use of mosses to quantify metal deposition rates. Zechmeister (1998, 156178) found that the
uptake efficiency for 12 heavy metals in 3 species of moss was similar, but that uptake
efficiency in a fourth species was uncorrelated with the other species for about half the
metals considered. Zechmeister (1998, 156178) also showed that productivity of an
individual species can vary greatly among sites. To calculate atmospheric deposition of
metals from accumulation in mosses, both the metal concentration and the rate of biomass
production is needed. Further complication was shown in the study of Shakya et al. (2008,
156081), which revealed that accumulation of Cu, Zn and Pb decreased chlorophyll content.
Sites with greater deposition amounts may therefore have lower rates of productivity than
cleaner sites.
Differences in uptake efficiencies among species and productivity among sites has led
to the use of a single moss species placed in mesh bags that can be distributed to areas
where that species of moss does not grow naturally. Studies to standardize this passive
deposition monitoring approach have been limited. Adamo et al. (2007, 155644) evaluated
the effects of washing with water, oven drying, and acid washing as preteatments and
found little difference in uptake efficiencies, although the ratio of the collecting surface area
to mass was found to be a key factor in uptake efficiency.
Couto et al. (2004, 155739) investigated dry versus bulk deposition of metals using
transplanted moss bags. This study showed that at some sites dry deposition exceeded bulk
deposition, a likely outcome of wash-off of dry deposited particles. This study also
documented intercationic displacement and leaching as a result of acidic precipitation. The
July 2009
9-224
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
authors concluded that the accumulated metal concentration represented an unstable
equilibrium between inputs and outputs of elements that were a function of the local
environment and weather during the exposure period. They also concluded that it was not
possible to extrapolate calibrations between metal accumulation in moss and atmospheric
deposition of metals to areas with different weather conditions, precipitation pH, and air
contaminant concentrations. Zechmeister et al. (2003, 157175) also presented results
demonstrating the problems with dry deposited particles that can be washed off by rain.
These studies indicate that moss is not a completely effective collector of total particle
deposition. Deposition estimates from moss accumulation probably represent values that
fall between wet deposition and total deposition.
A European moss biomonitoring network has been in place since 1990 (Harmens et
al., 2007, 155828). Sampling surveys are repeated every 5 yr. The survey conducted in
2005/2006 occurred in 32 countries at over 7000 sites. The network reports metal
concentrations associated with live moss tissue. Trends analysis of these data showed
statistically significant decreases over time in moss concentrations for As, Cu, V, and Zn.
Trends were not observed for Cr, Fe, or Ni. Results for individual countries participating in
the survey have also been published. In Hungary, major pollution sources were readily
detected by moss sampling (Otvos, 2003). Somewhat higher metal concentrations in mosses
in 1997 than in other European countries were attributed to the use of a different moss
species in the Hungarian survey (Otvos, 2003). Similar sampling in Romania showed
regions with contamination that were among the highest in Europe. These results were
consistent with known air quality problems in Romania (Lucaciu et al., 2004, 155947).
Because particulate deposition is not well characterized using this method, spatial patterns
and temporal trends for particulate metal deposition in Europe only provide crude
estimates of relative deposition patterns.
The use of moss to assess heavy metal deposition has received much less attention in
the U.S. than in Europe. A study conducted in the Blue Ridge Mountains, VA, found that
metal concentrations in moss were related to elevation and canopy species at some sites
(Schilling and Lehman, 2002, 113075). However, metal concentrations in moss were not
related to concentrations in the O horizon of the soil. Other measurement methods for trace
metal deposition were not available to compare with moss concentrations.
Epiphytic lichens have also been used to evaluate heavy metal accumulation. Helena
et al. (2004, 155833) found substantially increased concentrations of metals in lichens
July 2009
9-225
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
transplanted from a relatively clean region to an area in proximity to a metal smelter. The
presence of specific species of bryophyte or lichen can serve as an effective bioindicator of
metal contamination (Cuny et al., 2004, 155742). In some studies, tree bark has been used
as a biomonitor for atmospheric deposition of heavy metals (Baptista et al., 2008, 155673;
Pacheco and Freitas, 2004, 156011; Rusu et al., 2006, 156062).
Biomonitoring using mosses, lichens, or other types of vegetation has been well
established as a means of identifying spatial patterns in atmospheric deposition of heavy
metals in relation to power plants, industry, and other point and regional emissions
sources. More recently, a number of studies (Lopez Alonso et al., 2002, 155943; 2003,
155944; 2003, 155945) have used cattle that have been reared predominantly on local
forage as a means of monitoring atmospheric inputs of Cu, Ar, Zn, and Hg. For example, Hg
emissions from coal fired power plants in Spain had a substantial effect on Hg
accumulation by calves (Lopez Alonso et al., 2003, 155944). Accumulation of Hg by cattle
extended to -140-200 km downwind from the source.
Yang and Zhu (2007, 156168) investigated the effectiveness of pine needles as passive
air samplers for SOCs, such as PAHs, that are partially or completely particle-associated in
the atmosphere. PAH distribution patterns are complicated by their properties, which span
a broad range of octanol-air partition coefficients. This allows them to be present in both
vapor and particle phases. In addition, the air-plant partitioning of PAHs is affected by air
temperature and atmospheric stability (Yang and Chen, 2007, 092847). DeNicola et al.
(2005, 155747) documented the suitability of a Mediterranean evergreen oak (Quercus ilex)
to serve as a passive biomonitor for atmospheric contamination with PAH in Italy.
Deposition to Canopies
Tree canopies have been shown to increase dry deposition from the atmosphere,
including deposition of PM. Dry deposition rates in the canopy are commonly estimated by
the difference between throughfall deposition and deposition measured by an open collector,
although the use of this approach to specifically quantify particulate deposition is
complicated by gaseous deposition to leaf surfaces and, for some elements, leaching and
uptake. Avila and Rodrigo (2004, 155664) found that trace metal deposition in throughfall
in a Spanish oak forest were higher than bulk deposition for Cu, Pb, Mn, V, and Ni, but not
for Cd and Zn. This study also found that dry deposition of Cu, Pb, Zn, Cd and V occurred,
but that canopy uptake of Zn and Cd also occurred. Leaching of Mn and Ni from the foliage
July 2009
9-226
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
was observed as well. Leaching of Ni, Cu, Mn, Rb, and Sr from a red spruce-balsam fir
canopy by acidic cloud water was also measured in a study by Lawson et al. (2003, 089371).
These studies suggest that leaching of trace metals from forest canopies varies with tree
species and the acidity of precipitation. Throughfall therefore cannot be assumed to
represent total deposition of heavy metals without evaluating uptake and leaching at the
specific study site.
Physical models have provided an alternative to estimating dry deposition to canopies
with throughfall measurements. Recently, Pryor and Binkowski (2004, 116805) identified
an additional complication in that models typically hold particle size constant.
Nevertheless, there maybe significant modification of particle size distributions during the
deposition process. Condensation processes in the vicinity of the canopy can increase
particle size and may explain discrepancies between observations and modeled dry
deposition that is based on air sampling of particulates above the canopy.
The use of pine and oak canopies as bioindicators of atmospheric trace metal pollution
was investigated by Aboal et al. (2004, 155642). Metal concentrations in leaves were found
to be one to three orders of magnitude lower than in mosses collected in this study. As an
ecosystem pool, metals in leaves were likely to be much more important than those in
mosses. The authors concluded, however, that these tree species were not effective
bioindicators of atmospheric deposition of heavy metals.
The effectiveness of tree canopies in capturing particulates was investigated as a
method for improving air quality by Freer-Smith et al. (2004, 156451). This study showed
that with consideration of planting design, location of pollution source, and tree species,
planting of trees can be effective at reducing particulate air pollution. However, this
approach does not address the possible effects of the captured pollution on trees, soils and
surface waters.
High-elevation forests generally receive larger particulate deposition loadings than
equivalent low elevation sites. Higher wind speeds at high elevation enhance the rate of
aerosol impaction. Orographic effects enhance rainfall intensity and composition and
increase the duration of occult deposition. High-elevation forests are often dominated by
coniferous species with needle-shaped leaves that enhance impaction and retention of PM
delivered by all three deposition modes.
July 2009
9-227
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Deposition to Soil
As with mosses, accumulation of heavy metals in surface soils provides a general
reflection of the spatial distribution of industrial pollution. The distribution of toxic
elements in urban soils has been an important area of study (Madrid et al., 2002, 155956;
Markiewicz Patkowska et al., 2005, 155963). Generally, Cu, Pb, Zn, and Ni have
accumulated in urban soils compared with their rural counterparts (Yuangen et al., 2006,
156174). In the study of Romic and Romic (2003, 156055), relationships were found between
urban activities and concentrations of metals in soils in developed areas surrounding
Zagreb, Croatia. Goodarzi et al. (2002, 155801) compared deposition estimated by moss
bags to concentrations of metals in A-horizon soils in the vicinity of a large smelter.
Statistically significant correlations were observed between the moss bag deposition
estimates and the soil metal concentrations for Cd, Pb, Zn, and in some cases also Cu.
These correlations suggested that atmospheric deposition of metals caused elevated metal
concentrations in the upper mineral horizon of these soils. No correlations were found for
Hg or As in this study.
Studies have also looked at metal accumulation in peat because of the tendency of
most metals to be immobilized through binding with organic matter. Steinnes et al. (2005,
156095) presented geographical patterns of metal concentrations in surface peat
throughout Norway that corresponded to pollution sources, although the peat samples were
collected in 1979. Zaccone et al. (2007, 179930) found that variations of metal
concentrations with depth in a single Swiss peat core corresponded with the depositional
history that would be expected from the industrial revolution, although Cs137 activity
exhibited a distribution in the profile that was not fully consistent with the Chernobyl
nuclear reactor accident. A detailed study of Finish peat showed that relationships between
depth profiles of metal concentrations and deposition history can match well for some
metals at some sites, but not well for the same metals at other sites (Roberts et al., 2003,
156051). They also found that Zn and Cd accumulation rates were independent of
deposition history at each of three study sites.
Metal deposition to soil is also a significant concern adjacent to roadways. Urban
stormwater can be rich in heavy metals and other contaminants derived from atmospheric
deposition, and can be a major source of pollutant inputs to water bodies in urban settings.
Urban stormwater runoff can also be toxic to aquatic biota, partly due to trace metal
concentrations (Greenstein et al., 2004, 155808! Sabin et al., 2005, 088300; Schiff et al.,
July 2009
9-228
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
2002, 156959). These processes are largely a function of the impervious nature of much of
the ground surface in urban areas (i.e., buildings, roads, sidewalks, parking lots,
construction sites). Dry-deposited pollutants can build up, especially in arid and semi-arid
environments, and then be washed into surface waters with the first precipitation event.
The concentrations of Cd, Ca, Cu, Pb, and Zn in road runoff were found to be significantly
higher during winter in Sweden. This seasonal pattern was attributed to the intense
wearing of the pavement that occurred during winter due to the use of studded tires in
combination with chemical effects of deicing salts (Backstrom et al., 2003, 156242).
9.4.3. Direct Effects of PM on Vegetation
Exposure to airborne PM can lead to a range of phytotoxic responses, depending on
the particular mix of deposited particles. This was well known at the time of the previous
PM criteria assessment, as summarized below. Most direct phytotoxic effects occur in
severely polluted areas surrounding industrial point sources, such as limestone quarries
and other mining activities, cement kilns, and metal smelting facilities (U.S. EPA, 2006,
090110). Experimental application of PM constituents to foliage typically elicits little
response at the more common ambient concentrations. The diverse chemistry and size
characteristics of ambient PM and the lack of clear distinction between effects attributed to
phytotoxic particles and to other air pollutants further confound understanding of the
direct effects on foliar surfaces.
Deposition of PM can cause the accumulation of heavy metals on vegetative surfaces.
Low solubility limits foliar uptake and direct heavy metal toxicity because trace metals
must be brought into solution before they can enter into the leaves or bark of vascular
plants. In those instances when trace metals are absorbed, they are frequently bound in
leaf tissue and are lost when the leaf drops off (Hughes, 1981, 156578).
Depending on the size of the particles, the PM deposited on the leaf surface can affect
the plant's metabolism and photosynthesis by blocking light, obstructing stomatal
apertures, increasing leaf temperature and altering pigment and mineral content (Naidoo
and Chirkoot, 2004, 190449) (see Section 9.4.3.1.). Fine PM has been shown to enter the
leaf through the stomata and penetrate into the mesophyll layers where it alters leaf
chemistry (Da Silva et al., 2006, 190190). Kuki et al. (2008, 155346) also showed increased
leaf permeability and increased activity of enzymes in response to fine PM lead (see
discussion in Section 9.4.5.).
July 2009
9-229
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Studies of the direct toxic effects of particles on vegetation have not yet advanced to
the stage of reproducible exposure experiments. In general, phytotoxic gases are deposited
more readily assimilated more rapidly and lead to greater direct injury of vegetation as
compared with most common particulate materials. The dose-response functions obtained
in early experiments following the exposure of plants to phytotoxic gases generally have not
been observed following the application of particles (EPA, 2004, 056905).
9.4.3.1. Effects of Coarse-mode Particles
The current state of scientific knowledge regarding the direct effects of coarse PM on
plants has not changed since publication of the previous PM criteria assessment (EPA,
2004, 056905). The summary provided here is taken from that report. In many rural areas
and some urban areas, the majority of the mass in the coarse particle mode derives from
the elements silicon, aluminum, calcium, and iron, suggesting a crustal origin as fugitive
dust from disturbed land, roadways, agriculture tillage, or construction activities. Large
particles tend to deposit near their source (Grantz et al., 2003, 155805) and rapid
sedimentation of coarse particles tends to restrict their direct effects on vegetation largely
to roadsides and forest edges, which often receive the greatest deposition (EPA, 2004,
056905)
Dust
Dust can cause both physical and chemical effects. Consequences are often mediated
via impacts on leaf cuticles and waxes. Deposition of inert PM on above-ground plant
organs sufficient to coat them with a layer of dust may result in changes in radiation
received, a rise in leaf temperature, and the blockage of stomata. Crust formation can
reduce photosynthesis and the formation of carbohydrates needed for normal growth,
induce premature leaf-fall, damage leaf tissues, inhibit growth of new tissue, and reduce
starch storage. Dust may decrease photosynthesis, respiration, and transpiration! and it
may result in the condensation and reactivity of gaseous pollutants with PM, thereby
causing visible injury symptoms and decreased productivity (EPA, 2004, 056905). Leaves
with trichomes may be more prone to the accumulation of dust on leaf surfaces (Kuki et al.,
2008, 155346).
The chemical composition of PM is usually the key phytotoxic factor leading to plant
injury. For example, cement-kiln dust liberates calcium hydroxide on hydration. It can then
July 2009
9-230
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
penetrate the epidermis and enter the mesophyll, causing an increase in leaf surface pH. In
turn, surface pH can be important for surface microbial colonization and wax formation and
degradation.
Salt
Sea-salt particles can serve as nuclei for the absorption and subsequent reaction of
other gaseous and particulate air pollutants. Direct effects on vegetation reflect these
inputs and salt injury caused by the sodium and chloride that constitute the bulk of these
particles. The source of most salt spray is aerosolized ocean water. Sea salt can cause
damage to plants! however, it is not covered in this assessment because it is not of
anthropogenic origin. However particulate salt may be input to an ecosystem from deicing
salt.
Injury to vegetation from the application of deicing salt is caused by salt spray blown
or drifting from the highways (Viskari and Karenlampi, 2000, 019101). The most severe
injury is often observed nearest the highway. Conifers planted near roadway margins in the
eastern U.S. often exhibit foliar injury due to toxic amounts of saline aerosols deposited
from deicing solutions (EPA, 2004, 056905).
Exposure of vegetation to atmospheric PM deposition can lead to varying levels of
effects, depending on PM deposition amounts and the chemical make-up of the deposited
materials. Nevertheless, most of the well-documented examples of direct PM effects have
been caused largely by coarse particles deposited in close proximity to industrial point
sources, such as limestone quarries, cement kilns, and metal smelting facilities (Grantz et
al., 2003, 155805). Fine particles tend to have wider atmospheric distribution, and their
direct effects have not been as clearly demonstrated.
9.4.4. PM and Diffuse Light Effects
Atmospheric PM can affect ambient radiation, which can be considered in both its
direct and diffuse components. Foliar interception by canopy elements occurs for both up-
and down-welling radiation. Therefore, the effect of atmospheric PM on atmospheric
turbidity influences canopy processes both by radiation attenuation and by changing the
efficiency of radiation interception in the canopy through conversion of direct to diffuse
radiation (Hoyt, 1978, 046638). Diffuse radiation is more uniformly distributed throughout
the canopy and increases canopy photosynthetic productivity by distributing radiation to
July 2009
9-231
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
lower leaves. The enrichment in photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) present in
diffuse radiation appears to offset a portion of the effect of an increased atmospheric albedo
due to atmospheric particles.
The effects of regional haze on the yield of crops because of reduction in solar
radiation were examined by Chameides et al. (1999, 011184) in China, where regional haze
is especially severe. They estimated that approximately 70% of crops were being depressed
by at least 3 to 5% by regional scale air pollution and its associated haze (Chameides et al.,
1999, 011184; EPA, 2004, 056905).
The net effect of PM on photosynthesis depends on the balance between the reduction
in total PAR (which decreases photosynthesis) and the increase in the diffuse fraction of
PAR (which tends to increase photosynthesis). The 'global dimming' period occurred
between 1950 and 1980 and was characterized by reduced PAR and increased diffuse light
caused by anthropogenic aerosols. Mercado et al. (2009, 190444) estimate the effects of
variations in diffuse light on the terrestrial carbon sink during the last century using a
global model. The results indicate that the terrestrial carbon sink increased by
approximately 25% during the "global dimming'" period, likely driven by increased diffuse
light despite decreased PAR. However under a future scenario in which S( ) r and BC
aerosols decline, the diffuse-radiation and the associated terrestrial C sink also decline.
9.4.5. Effects of Trace Metals on Ecosystems
Trace metals may enter the ecosystems as both fine and coarse particles. All but 10 of
the 90 elements that comprise the inorganic fraction of the soil occur at concentrations of
<0.1% (1000 pg/g) and are termed "trace" elements or trace metals. Trace metals with a
density greater than 6 g/cm3, referred to as "heavy metals" (e.g., Cd, Cu, Pb, Cr, Hg, Ni, Zn),
are of particular interest because of their potential toxicity to plants and animals. Although
some trace metals are essential for vegetative growth or animal health, they are all toxic in
large quantities. Most trace elements exist in the atmosphere in particulate form as metal
oxides (Ormrod, 1984, 046892). Aerosols containing trace elements derive predominantly
from industrial activities. Generally, only the heavy metals Cd, Cr, Ni, and Hg are released
from stacks in the vapor phase (McGowan et al., 1993, 046731). Atmospherically deposited
PM can interact with a variety of biogeochemical processes. The potential pathways of
accumulation of trace metals in terrestrial ecosystems, as well as the possible consequences
of trace metal deposition on ecosystem functions, are summarized in Figure 9"84 (U.S. EPA,
July 2009
9-232
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
2004, 056905). A number of mass balance approaches (Macleod et al., 2005, 155954; Toose
and Mackay, 2004, 156123), and metal speciation and transport models (Bhavsar et al.,
2004, 155689; Bhavsar et al., 2004, 155690; Gandhi et al., 2007, 155781) have been
developed in recent years.
Atmospheric Pb is a component of PM in some regions. The effects of Pb on
ecosystems were discussed in the 2006 Pb AQCD (U.S. EPA, 2006, 090110). which
concluded that, due to the deposition of Pb from past human practices (e.g., leaded gasoline,
ore smelting) and the long residence time of Pb in many aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems,
a legacy of environmental Pb burden exists, over which is superimposed much lower
contemporary atmospheric Pb loadings. The potential for ecological effects of the combined
legacy and contemporary Pb burden to occur is a function of the bioavailability or
bioaccessibility of the Pb. This, in turn, is highly dependent upon numerous site factors
(e.g., soil OC content, pH, water hardness). Although the more localized ecosystem impacts
observed around smelters are often striking, effects generally cannot be attributed solely to
Pb, because of the presence of many other stressors (e.g., other heavy metals, oxides of
sulfur and nitrogen) that can also act singly or in concert with Pb to cause readily
observable environmental impacts (U.S. EPA, 2008, 157074; EPA, 2004, 056905).
Effects of fine particle trace elements were described by the U.S. EPA (2004, 056905).
and some additional more recent research has also been conducted, especially on the topic
of vegetative uptake of trace elements from the soil. The state of scientific understanding as
presented by the U.S. EPA (2004, 056905) as well as a discussion of more recent research
findings are presented below.
July 2009
9-233
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
9. Retranslocation
Atmosphere
1. Wet/Dry Deposition
Above-
Ground
Storage,
Metabolism
2. Foliar Uptake
Plant Surface
Phyllosphere
3, Lrtterfall, Res us pension,
Deposition, Leaching,
Stem Flow
8, Volatile Loss
4. Translocation
Biologically
Available >
Biologically
Unavailable
10, Root
\ Turnover
5. Mass Flow,
_ Diffusion
11. Mineralization
IX.
Soil Organic
Upper Soil
VI.
Root Storage,
Metabolism
7. Leaching
Rhizosphere/
Rhizoplane
6. Root
Uptake
12. Weathering
VII.
Lower Soi
Primary
Minerals
5. Mass Flow,
Diffusion
7. Leaching
VIII.
Groundwater
Source: U.S. EPA (2004, 056905)
Figure 9-84. Relationship of plant nutrients and trace metals with vegetation. Compartments (roman
numerals) represent potential storage sites; whereas arrows (Arabic numerals)
represent potential transfer routes.
9.4.5.1. Direct Effects of Metals
Direct effects of trace elements on vegetation can result from their deposition and
residence on foliar surfaces. Direct metal phytotoxicity can occur only if the metal can move
from the surface into the leaf or directly from the soil into the root. Low solubility limits
entry into plant tissue. Trace metals absorbed into leaf tissue are eventually transferred to
the soil litter layer where they can affect litter decomposition, an important source of soil
nutrients. Fungi and microorganisms living on leaves aid in leaf decomposition after leaves
are dropped to the forest floor. Changes in litter decomposition processes in response to
July 2009
9-234
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
metal toxicity can influence nutrient cycling in the soil and limit the supply of essential
nutrients.
Foliar Effects
Da Silva et al. (2006, 190190) have shown that PM had anatomical and physiological
effects on plants growing near an iron pelletization factory in Brazil. The effects of PM
occurred due to foliar uptake. Structural characteristics such as peltate trichomes, probably
formed a barrier lessening the penetration of metallic iron into the mesophyll in some
species. Iron was shown to penetrate the trichomes, epidermic cells (adaxial and abaxial
surfaces), stomata, xylem cells, collenchyma, endodermis and mesophyll tissues. Once
entering the stomata, the PM penetrates within the mesophyll, it may modify the chemical
balance of the mesophyll (Da Silva et al., 2006, 190190).
A greenhouse study evaluated the combined effects of iron dust on restinga vegetation
(coastal vegetation of Brazil) that commonly grows near iron ore industries simulated field
conditions. Kuki et al. (2008, 155346) found that iron dust had differing effects on gas
exchange, chlorophyll content, iron content and antioxidant enzyme activity on two plant
species common to the restinga. Schinus terebinthifolius (an invasive exotic in the U.S.)
was not affected by the iron dust. However, Sophora tomentosa showed increased iron
content and membrane permeability to the leaves, increased activity of antioxidant
enzymes. These results showed that the plants used different strategies to cope with PM
pollution, S. terebinthifolius avoided stress, while S. tomentosa used antioxidant enzyme
systems to partially neutralize oxidative stress.
Toxicity to Mosses and Lichens
At the time of the most recent air quality criteria report for PM (EPA, 2004, 056905),
trace metal toxicity to lichens had been demonstrated in relatively few cases. Nash (1975,
016763) documented Zn toxicity in the vicinity of a Zn smelter near Palmerton, PA.
Experimental data had suggested that lichen tolerance to Zn and Cd generally ranges
between 200 and 600 ppm (Nash TH, 1975, 016763).
The effects of deposited metals on the mosses have not been well studied. Tremper et
al. (2004, 156126) exposed mosses of two species to roadside conditions and sampled them
over a period of three months. Under field conditions, chlorophyll concentrations in moss
tissue were not affected by metal contamination and accumulation
July 2009
9-235
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Mosses and lichens readily take up metals from atmospheric deposition. Otnyukova
(2007, 156009) demonstrated vertical gradients within a coniferous forest canopy in the
fruticose lichen genus Usnea with respect to lichen thallus morphology and heavy metal
concentration. Abnormal thalli at the tree-top level contained higher concentrations of Al,
Fe, Zn, F, Sr, and Pb. This vertical pattern within the tree canopy is in general accordance
with known deposition of PM to plants (Otnyukova, 2007, 156009).
There is an extensive literature on the use of mosses and lichens for estimating
deposition (biomonitors) and indicating metal exposure in ecosystems (bioindicators) (see
Section 9.4.2.3.).
9.4.5.2. Effects on Soil Chemistry
Trace metals are naturally found in small amounts in soils, ground water, and
vegetation. Many are essential micronutrients required for growth by plants and animals.
Naturally occurring mineralization can produce metal concentrations in soils and
vegetation that are high compared to atmospheric sources. Many metals are bound by
chemical processes in the soil, reducing their availability to biota. However, epiphytic or
parasitic root colonizing microorganisms can solubilize and transport metals for root uptake
(Lingua et al., 2008, 155935). It can be difficult to assess the extent to which observed
heavy metal concentrations in soil are of anthropogenic origin. This is because soil parent
material, pedogenesis, and anthropogenic inputs all influence the amounts and distribution
of trace elements in soil. Trace element concentrations in some natural soils that are remote
from air pollution can be higher than soils derived from other parent materials that receive
anthropogenic inputs (Burt et al., 2003, 155709). The general effects of metals from
atmospheric deposition are presented in the following discussion.
There is not a standard method available for quantifying the bioavailability of heavy
metals in soil. A variety of models, isotopic studies, and sequential extraction methods have
been used (Shan et al., 2003, 156972; Collins et al., 2003, 155737; Feng et al., 2005,
155774). Total metal concentration in soil does not give a good indication of potential
biological effects because soils vary in their ability to bind metals in forms that are not
bioavailable. There are various methods available for assessing bioavailability of metals,
but soils are heterogeneous and there is no ideal method for evaluating what conditions the
soil biota experience. Almas et al. (2004, 155654) argued that the actual measurement of
biological effects is the best criterion for determining bioavailability. In particular, the
July 2009
9-236
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
replacement of metal-sensitive microorganisms by metal-tolerant organisms within each
functional group may be one of the most sensitive indicators of metal exposure. An increase
in microbial trace metal tolerance per se would not be problematic if it was not for the fact
that this increase in tolerance is generally accompanied by a decrease in microbial diversity
(Lakzian et al., 2002, 156671; Almas AR et al., 2004, 155654).
Heavy metals deposited from the atmosphere to forests accumulate either in the
organic forest floor or in the upper mineral soil layers and metal concentration tends to
decrease with soil depth. The accumulation of heavy metals in soil is influenced by a variety
of soil characteristics, including pH, Fe and Al oxide content, amount of clay and organic
material, and cation exchange capacity (CEC) (Hernandez et al., 2003, 155841). Thus, the
pattern of distribution of heavy metals in soils depends on both the soil characteristics and
the metal characteristics.
Burt et al. (2003, 155709) investigated the concentrations and chemical forms of trace
metals in smelter-contaminated soils collected in the Anaconda and Deer Lodge Valley area
of Montana, one of the major mining districts of the world for over a century (1864-1983).
The relative distributions of trace metals within the more soluble soil extraction forms were
similar to their respective total concentrations. This suggested a relationship between the
concentrations of total trace elements and concentrations of soluble mobile fractions.
Sequential extractions do not provide direct characterization of trace metal speciation, but
rather an indication of chemical reactivity (Burt et al., 2003, 155709; Ramos et al., 1994,
046736). Soluble and exchangeable forms are considered readily mobile and bioavailable.
Those bound to clay minerals or organic matter are considered generally unavailable.
There is concern that Pb contamination of forest soil could move into groundwater.
This would be important in view of the large quantity of Pb deposited from the atmosphere
in the 1960s and 1970s in response to combustion of leaded gasoline. This issue was
investigated by Watmough et al. (2004, 077809) who applied a stable isotope (207Pb) to the
forest floors of white pine (Pinus strobus) and sugar maple (Acer saccharuni) stands. Added
Pb was rapidly lost from the forest floor, likely due to high litter turnover in these forest
types. However, Pb concentrations in the upper 30 cm of mineral soil were strongly
correlated with soil OM, suggesting that Pb does not readily move down the soil profile to
the ground water, but rather is associated with the organic content of the upper soil layers
(Watmough et al., 2004, 077809).
July 2009
9-237
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
The upper soil layers are typically an active site of litter decomposition and plant root
uptake, both processes may be affected by metal components of PM. Surface litter
decomposition is reduced in soils having high metal concentrations. This is likely due to the
sensitivity to metals of microbial decomposers and reduced palatability of plant litter
having high metal concentration (Johnson and Hale, 2008, 155881). Root decomposition is a
key component of nutrient cycling. Johnson and Hale (2008, 155881) measured in situ fine
root decomposition at Sudbury, Ontario and Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec. Elevated soil metal
concentrations (Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn) did not necessarily reduce fine root decomposition. Only at
sites having high concentrations of metals did decomposing roots show increased metal
concentrations over time.
9.4.5.3. Effects on Soil Microbes and Plant Uptake via Soil
Upon entering the soil environment, PM pollutants can alter ecological processes of
energy flow and nutrient cycling, inhibit nutrient uptake, change ecosystem structure, and
affect ecosystem biodiversity. Many of the most important effects occur in the soil. The soil
environment is one of the most dynamic sites of biological interaction in nature. It is
inhabited by microbial communities of bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes. These organisms
are essential participants in the nutrient cycles that make elements available for plant
uptake. Changes in the soil environment that influence the role of the bacteria and fungi in
nutrient cycling determine plant and ultimately ecosystem response.
Many of the major indirect plant responses to PM deposition are chiefly soil-mediated
and depend on the chemical composition of the individual components of deposited PM.
Effects may result in changes in biota and in soil conditions that affect ecological processes,
such as nutrient cycling and uptake by plants.
The soil environment is rich in biota. Bacteria and fungi are usually most abundant in
the rhizosphere, the soil around plant roots that all mineral nutrients must pass through.
Bacteria and fungi benefit from the nutrients that are present in root exudates and make
mineral nutrients available for plant uptake. The soil-mediated ecosystem impacts of PM
are largely determined by effects on the growth of bacteria and mycorrhizal fungi that are
involved in nutrient cycling and plant nutrient uptake.
July 2009
9-238
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Soil Nutrient Cycling
Accumulation of heavy metals in litter can interfere with nutrient cycling.
Microorganisms are responsible for decomposition of organic matter, which contributes to
soil fertility. Toxic effects on the microflora can be caused by Zn, Cd, and Cu. The U.S. EPA
(2004, 056905) judged that addition of only a few mg of Zn per kg of soil can inhibit
sensitive microbial processes. Enzymes involved in the cycling of N, P, and S (especially
arylsulfatase and phosphatase) seem to be most affected (Kandeler et al., 1996, 094392).
Soil organic matter cycling is known to be sensitive to disturbance due to heavy metal
pollution. This can cause increased litter accumulation at sites close to metal emissions
point sources. The relative importance of the various processes that might be responsible
for this observation is poorly known. Boucher et al. (2005, 155699) conducted CO2 evolution
studies in microcosms having metal-rich and metal-poor plant materials. Their results
suggested that there was a pool of less readily decomposable C that appeared to be
preferentially preserved in the presence of high metal (Zn, Pb, Cd) concentrations in the
leaves of the metallophyte Arabidopsis halleri. An additional possibility is that increased
lignification of the cell walls increased the amount of insoluble C (Mayo et al., 1992,
155974).
Yuangen et al. (2006, 156174) found that urban soil basal respiration rates were
positively correlated with soil acetic acid-extractable Cd, Cu, Ni, and Zn. The soil microbial
biomass was negatively correlated with the concentrations of Pb fractions, but not with
other metals. Overall microbial biomass was lower for urban soils as compared with rural
soils (Yuangen et al., 2006, 156174).
Metal Toxicity to Microbial Communities
It is believed that increased accumulation of litter in metal-contaminated areas is due
to the effects of metal toxicity on microorganisms. Smith (1991, 042566) reported the effects
of Cd, Cu, Ni, and Zn on the symbiotic activity of fungi, bacteria, and actinomycetes. In
particular, the formation of mycorrhizae has been shown to be reduced when Zn, Cu, Ni,
and Cd were added to the soil.
Most studies of the effects of heavy metals on soils have been conducted under
laboratory conditions. However, Oliveira and Pampulha (2006, 156827) performed a field
study to evaluate long-term changes in soil microbiological characteristics in response to
heavy metal contamination. Dehydrogenase activity, soil ATP content, and enumeration of
July 2009
9-239
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
major soil microbial groups illustrated the effects of contamination. There was a marked
decrease in total numbers of the different microbial groups. In particular, asymbiotic
nitrogen-fixers and heterotrophic bacteria were found to be sensitive. Dehydrogenase
activity was confirmed to be a good assay for determining the effect of heavy metals on
physiologically active soil microbial biomass.
The toxic effects of heavy metals on soil microorganisms are well known. However,
less is known about the relative sensitivity of different types of soil microorganisms
(Rajapaksha et al., 2004, 156035). Vaisvalavicius et al. (2006, 157080) assessed the toxicity
of high concentrations of Pb (839 mg/kg), Zn (844 mg/kg), and Cu (773 mg/kg) in the upper 0
to 0.1 m soil layer. Microbial abundance of all groups was reduced and enzymatic activity
was lower than for uncontaminated soil. In particular, actinomycetes, oligonitrophobic and
mineral N assimilating bacteria were most affected.
Effects of heavy metals in soil on microbes depends on soil pH, organic content, and
the type of heavy metal exposure (Kucharski and Wyszkowska, 2004, 156662). Some studies
have shown that heavy metals inhibit microbial activity in soil (Smejkalova et al., 2003,
156987; Vasundhara et al., 2004, 156133). However, Wyszkowska et al. (2007, 179948)
showed that heavy metals can either inhibit or stimulate the growth of soil microbes.
Populations of Azotobacter spp. decreased, but populations of oligotrophic and copiotrophic
bacteria, actinomyces, and fungi increased in response to heavy metal exposure. Acute
metal stress causes a decrease in microbial biomass as metal-sensitive microbes are
inhibited (Joynt et al., 2006, 155887).
Studies of the impacts of metal stress on the microbial community composition in soil
have generally been based on microbial culturing techniques that can select only a subset of
the natural soil population of microbes. More recent culture-independent studies have been
conducted using phospholipids or nucleic acid biomarkers to reveal information regarding
changes in microbial community structure (Joynt et al., 2006, 155887). Using this approach,
Joynt et al.(2006, 155887) demonstrated that soils contaminated with both metals (Pb, Cr)
and organic solvent compounds over a period of several decades had undergone changes in
community composition, but still contained a phytogenetically diverse group of bacteria.
This may reflect adaptation to the potentially toxic conditions through such processes as
natural selection, gene exchange, and immigration. Comparison between a severely
contaminated soil with a similar soil that had much lower amounts of contamination
showed considerably lower microbial diversity in the contaminated soil, particularly for
July 2009
9-240
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
asymbiotic nitrogen fixers and heterotrophic bacteria (Oliveira and Pampulha, 2006,
156827).
As pollution increases, it is expected that the more sensitive species will be lost and
the more tolerant species remain. This gives rise to the concept of pollution-induced
community tolerance (PICT), which has been demonstrated for populations of bacteria and
fungi (Davis et al., 2004, 155744). These researchers assessed the effects of long-term Zn
exposure on the metabolic diversity and tolerance to Zn of a soil microbial community
across a gradient of Zn pollution. PICT was found to correlate better with total soil Zn than
with the concentration of Zn in soil pore water.
Soil Microbe Interactions with Plant Uptake of Metals
Atmospherically-deposited metals accumulate in upper soil horizons where fine roots
are most developed. The availability for plant uptake of metals in soil depends on metal
speciation and soil pH. In addition, metal binding to dissolved organic matter (DOM)
reduces bioavailability (Sauve, 2001, 156948). Because organic matter typically decreases
with soil depth, the affinity of metals for organic matter can influence metal bioavailability
at different soil depths. Fine roots (<2 mm diameter) provide the major site of uptake and
transport to the above-ground plant and generally contain a large proportion of the total
metals found in plants (Gordon and Jackson, 2000, 155802).
Fine roots are often colonized by mycorrhiza and interact with other soil microbes.
Recent published evidence supports that mycorrizha and bacteria influence plant uptake
and tolerance of metals. Mycorrhiza are fungi that colonize plant roots to form a symbiosis.
Mycorrhiza uptake nutrients from the soil and transfer them to the plant in exchange for
carbon from the plant. Like plants, some species and strains of mycorrhiza are more
tolerant of metals in the soil (Ray et al., 2005, 190473), so that unpolluted and polluted
sites may host different species and strains of mycorrhiza (Vogel-Mikus et al., 2005,
190501).
Mycorrhiza have been observed to cause a range of effects on plants. In some cases,
plants colonized with mycorrhiza showed improved nutrient uptake and decreased metal
uptake (Berthelsen et al., 1995, 078058; Vogel-Mikus et al., 2006, 190502; Nogueira et al.,
2004, 190460). Mycorrhiza have been shown to accumulate metals and act as a sink
(Berthelsen et al., 1995, 078058; Carvalho et al., 2006, 155715) often preventing the metals
in the roots from allocation to shoots (Kaldorf et al., 1999, 190399; Zhang et al., 2005,
July 2009
9-241
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
192083; Soares and Siqueira, 2008, 190482). For example, estuarine salt marshes are often
located close to urban and industrial areas and receive elevated amounts of trace metal
contaminants from point and nonpoint (including atmospheric deposition) sources.
Vegetation is important in the retention and accumulation of heavy metals in salt marshes.
Carvalho et al. (2006, 155715) conducted experiments on the effects of arbuscular
mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on the uptake of Cd and Cu by Aster tripolium, a common plant
species in polluted salt marshes and a host of AMF. Carvalho et al. (2006, 155715) found
that AMF colonization increased metal accumulation in the root system of Aster tripolium
without enhancing translocation to the shoot. By trapping toxic metals in the roots, this
plant species may reduce the extent of vegetative stress caused by metal exposure and act
as an effective sink for these metals. In a review paper Christie et al. (2004, 190171)
concluded that mycorrhiza may directly improve plant tolerance to metals by binding and
immobilizing metals and indirectly improve plant tolerance by improving uptake of
nutrients that increase plant growth.
There is recent evidence that bacteria and mycorrhiza act together to improve plant
tolerance to metals. Like mycorrhiza some bacteria are more tolerant to metals than others
(Vivas et al., 2003, 190499). Combined inoculation of Trifnlium sp. by the arbuscular
mycorrhiza Glomus mosseae and the bacterium Brevivacillus sp. conferred tolerance to Cd
by increasing nutrient status and rooting development and by creasing Cd uptake by the
plant (Vivas et al., 2003, 190499). A similar results was observed for Zn uptake (Vivas et al.,
2006, 190500).
In some cases mycorhizzae will not prevent metal uptake (Weissenhorn et al., 1995,
073826). In fact mycorrhiza may facilitate the accumulation of metals in plants and
mycorrhiza will enhance the translocation of metals from the root to the shoot (Vogel-Mikus
et al., 2005, 190501; Citterio et al., 2005, 190176; Zimmer et al., 2009, 192085). There is
evidence of variable responses depending on the combination of mycorrhiza and bacteria
species. Zimmer et al. (2009, 192085) recently showed that the willow tree Salix sp.
colonized with the ectomycorrhizal fungus Hebeloma crustuliniforme and the bacteria
Microcuccus luters increased total Cd and Zn accumulation due to enhanced mycorrhizal
formation. In these cases where soil microbes cause increased metal accumulation, there is
a potential to use the system for phytoremediation.
Plants also vary in the extent to which they take up heavy metals from the soil.
Variability has been shown to occur in response to different plant species and different
July 2009
9-242
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
metals. For example, Szabo and Fodor (2006, 156109) exposed winter wheat (Triticum
aestivuni), maize (Zen mays) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus) to a variety of
micro-pollutants. Cadmium accumulation was significant in both vegetative and
reproductive plant parts. Vegetative winter wheat accumulated substantial amounts of Hg,
but the other species did not. Lead, Cu, and Zn showed only moderate enrichment in crops
(Szabo and Fodor, 2006, 156109).
There is some evidence to support that shallowrooted plant species are most likely to
take up metals from the soil (Martin and Coughtrey, 1981, 047727). However, there is little
evidence confirming this observation. It may be more likely that shallow roots of species are
likely to take up metals because the metal often accumulates in shallow soil layers. Even
though atmospheric PM will usually deposit on soils before being taken up by plants, it
could also be deposited to aquatic systems with subsequent transfer to terrestrial plants.
Contamination of stream sediments by heavy metals can impact adjacent terrestrial
ecosystems when high flows cause resuspension and subsequent streamside deposition of
sediment particles. For example, Ozdilek et al. (2007, 156010) showed that metal
concentrations in vegetation along the Blackstone River in Massachusetts and Rhode
Island were generally inversely related to the distance from the riverbank, with higher
metal concentrations in plant tissues located near the river. The ability of plants to take up
metals from soil is an important part of metal cycling in the environment. This uptake
process allows the metals to enter the food web, where they might exert mutagenic,
carcinogenic, and teratogenic effects (Hunaiti et al., 2007, 156579).
9.4.5.4. Plant Response to Metals
Some metals, including Cu, Co, Ni, and Zn, are essential micronutrients needed for
plant growth. Others, including Hg, Cd, and Pb are not essential for plants. Though all
heavy metals can be directly toxic at sufficiently high concentrations, only Cu, Ni, and Zn
have been documented as being frequently toxic to plants (EPA, 2004, 056905), while
toxicity due to Cd, Co, and Pb has been observed less frequently (Smith, 1990,
046896).Toxic doses depend on the type of ion, ion concentration, plant species and the
stage of plant growth (Memon and Schroder, 2009, 190442). Toxicity response is also
dependent on the nutritional status of the plant and the development of mycorrhizae
(Strandberg et al., 2006, 156105). Plants respond to high concentrations of metals in soil
through a variety of mechanisms and there are substantial differences among plant species
July 2009
9-243
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
in their response to heavy metal exposure. Mechanisms of metal tolerance included
exclusion or excretion rates, genetics (Patra et al., 2004, 081976; Yang et al., 2005, 192104),
mycorrhizal interactions (Gohre and Paszkowski, 2006, 190355), storage capability and
accumulation (Clemens, 2006, 190179), and various cellular detoxification mechanisms
(Hall, 2002, 190365; Gratao et al., 2005, 190364).
One of the most important mechanisms that increases plant tolerance to metals is
chelation with phytochelatins, such as metallothioneins and peptide ligands that are
synthesized within the plant from glutathione (Memon and Schroder, 2009, 190442).
Phytochelatins are intracellular metal-binding peptides that act as specific indicators of
metal stress. Because they are produced by plants as a response to sublethal concentrations
of heavy metals, they can indicate that heavy metals play a role in forest decline (Gawel et
al., 1996, 012278). Phytochelatin concentrations have previously been measured in
coniferous trees in the northeastern U.S. The U.S. EPA (2004, 056905) and Grantz et al.
(2003, 155805) summarized studies indicating that both the number of dead red spruce
trees and phytochelatin concentrations increased sharply with elevation in the
northeastern U.S. Red spruce stands showing varying degrees of decline indicated a
systematic and significant increase in phytochelatin concentrations associated with the
extent of tree injury. These data suggest that metal stress might contribute to tree injury
and forest decline in the northeastern U.S. The extent to which low to moderate amounts of
heavy metal deposition, which might occur at locations that are not in close proximity to a
large point source, contribute to adverse impacts on forest vegetation is not known.
Although the phytochelatin data suggest a linkage, more direct experimental data would be
needed to confirm such a finding.
In general plant growth is negatively correlated with trace metal and heavy metal
concentration in soils and plant tissue (Audet and Charest, 2007, 190169). Trace metals,
particularly heavy metals can influence forest growth. Growth suppression of foliar
microflora has been shown to result from Fe, Al, and Zn. These three metals can also inhibit
fungal spore formation, as can Cd, Cr, Mg, and Ni (see Smith, 1990, 046896). Metals cause
stress and decreased photosynthesis (Kucera et al., 2008, 190408) and disrupt numerous
enzymes and metabolic pathways (Strydom et al., 2006, 190486). Excessive concentrations
of metals result in phytotoxicity through: (i) changes in the permeability of the cell
membrane! (ii) reactions of sulfydryl (-SH) groups with cations! (iii) affinity for reacting
July 2009
9-244
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
with phosphate groups and active groups of ADP or ATP; and (iv) replacement of essential
ions (Patra et al., 2004, 081976).
In addition to disrupting photosynthesis and other metabolic pathways, metals have
been shown to alter frost hardiness and impair nutrition. A recent review by Taulavuori
(2005, 190489) suggests that metal- induced stress reduces frost hardiness of plants, a
particular concern at high elevation sites. Kim et al. (2003, 155899) found decreased
concentration of K in needles and Ca in stems of Pinus sylvestris seedlings exposed to Cd
addition. This response suggests a disturbance of nutrition in response to Cd.
Pollutant-caused needle loss can reduce the interception of pollutants from the atmosphere,
and therefore reduce their concentrations in stemflow. This may be responsible for the
observation that species diversity of lichens is sometimes higher on trees affected by
die-back (Hauck, 2003, 155830).
Plant foliage can accumulate elemental Hg over time in response to air exposure and
concentrations in soil (Frescholtz et al., 2003, 190352; Ericksen et al., 2003, 155769). A
mesocosm experiment was conducted by Ericksen et al. (2003, 155769) where aspen trees
were grown in gas-exchange chambers in Hg-enriched soil (12.3 ± 1.3 pg/g) and the Hg
content in the foliage was analyzed. Foliar Hg increased with leaf age for two to three
months and then stabilized at leaf concentrations near 150 ng/g. About 80% of the Hg found
in above-ground biomass was present in the leaves. The concentration of Hg in trees grown
in the same mesocosms in containers of low Hg soil (0.03 ± 0.01 pg/g) exhibited foliar Hg
concentrations that were similar to those of trees grown in Hg-enriched soil. Almost all of
the foliar Hg originated from the atmosphere. Clearly, plant foliage can be a major sink for
airborne Hg, which can subsequently enter the soil after litterfall (Ericksen et al., 2003,
155769). However, this study did not determine the extent to which atmospheric Hg was
dry-deposited on the foliage, as opposed to gaseous uptake through the stomata. Foliar/air
Hg exchange has been shown to be dynamic and bi-directional (Millhollen et al., 2006,
190447). These investigators compared foliar Hg accumulation over time in three tree
species with fluxes measured using a plant gas-exchange system subsequent to soil
amendment with HgCb. Root tissue Hg concentrations were strongly correlated with soil
Hg concentrations, suggesting that below-ground accumulation of Hg by roots may be an
important process in the biogeochemical cycling of Hg in soil systems. Nevertheless,
measured foliar Hg fluxes indicated that deposition of atmospheric Hg constituted the
dominant flux of Hg to the leaf surface (Millhollen et al., 2006, 190447). Grigal (2003,
July 2009
9-245
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
155811) also found that Hg in vegetation is derived almost exclusively from the atmosphere.
Mercury uptake from soil is limited, partly because roots adsorb Hg but transport it to
foliage very poorly (Grigal, 2002, 156498). Grigal (2003, 155811) provided a thorough review
of the sequestration of Hg in forest and peatland ecosystems. A fundamental aspect of Hg
cycling is its strong relationship to organic matter. For that reason, peatlands sequester
much larger quantities of Hg than would be expected on the basis of their land area. Thus,
if global climate change affects C storage, it may indirectly affect Hg storage because of the
strong relationship between Hg and organic matter (Grigal, 2003, 155811).
Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi can play important roles in mitigating toxicity of
heavy metals in plants. For example, AM symbiosis is known to be involved in plant
adaptation to As-contaminated soils. Higher plants that are adapted to As contaminated
soils are generally associated with mycorrhizal fungi (Gonzalez-Chavez et al., 2002,
155800). It has also been shown that AM symbioses can influence plant coexistence and
community diversity (O'Connor, 2002). Some plants associated with AM fungi can
successfully colonize sites that are heavily contaminated by heavy metals (Pennisi, 2004,
156018).
Dong et al. (2008, 192106) cultivated white clover (Trifolium repens) and ryegrass
(Lolium perenne) in As-contaminated soil (water extractable As 82.7 mg/kg). The growth
and P nutrition of both species largely depended on AM symbiosis. The AM-inoculated
plants showed selective uptake and transfer of P over As.
PM pollution has the potential to alter species composition over long time scales. Kuki
et al. (2009, 190111) showed that early establishment stages of Sophora tomentosa species
were negatively affected by the combination of iron ore and acidifying particles. The
deleterious effects of the PM included deficient germination and toxic concentrations in
roots. In contrast, S. terebinthifolius was not affected by the PM revealing species
resistance to the pollution. The difference among species response suggests that over a long
time period the imbalance will likely change the species composition (Kuki et al., 2009,
190111).
The process of removing toxins from soil or water using photoautotrophs is referred to
as phytoremediation. Some plant species have good ability to extract heavy metals from
soil, thereby offering potential for phytoremediation (Clemens, 2006, 190179; Hooda, 2007,
190382; Padmavathiamma and Li, 2007, 190465) . For example, several species of willow
CSk/ixspp.) accumulate high concentrations of Zn and Cd in aboveground biomass
July 2009
9-246
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
(Lunackova et al., 2003, 155948; Meers et al., 2007, 155977; Rosselli et al., 2003, 156058). A
first estimation of the order of magnitude of potential metal removal by willow was 2 to 27
kg/ha/yr of Zn and 0.25 to 0.65 kg/ha/yr for Cd (Meers et al., 2007, 155977). Build-up of high
concentrations of trace metals in soil is difficult to remediate because of the long residence
times of metals in the environment. Plants that survive on heavy metal-contaminated soils
have been studied to elucidate the mechanisms that allow them to tolerate such conditions
and interactions between soil contamination and vegetation composition (Becker and
Brandel, 2007, 156260; Hall, 2002, 190365). There are numerous other plants that have
been investigated for application to phytoremediation. Plants that hyperaccumulate metals
have special potential for remediation of metal-contaminated sites. About 400 species have
been reported. Brassicaceae has the largest numbers of taxa, with 11 genera and 87 species
known to hyperaccumulate one or more metal contaminants (Prasad and De Oliveira
Freitas, 2003, 156885).
Plant uptake is often the first step for a metal to enter higher levels of the food web.
Consumers of vegetation may often receive heavy loading of metals from their diets. Metals
may also bioaccumulate in some species and tissue concentrations are magnified at the
higher trophic levels, so-called biomagnifications (see Section 9.4.5.7.on Biomagnification).
9.4.5.5. Effects on Aquatic Ecosystems
The atmospheric deposition of PM into the ocean has important implications for
primary productivity and carbon sequestration. This is because metals in PM deposition
limit phytoplankton growth in parts of the ocean (Crawford et al., 2003, 156370). In
particular, Fe and Zn can influence the productivity of algae that are involved in CaC03
production. The production of both particulate organic C and CaC03 drive the ocean's
biological carbon pump (Shulz et al., 2004, 156087). Thus, in oceanic areas of trace metal
limitation, changes in trace metal atmospheric deposition can affect biogenic calcification,
with potential consequences for CO2 partitioning between the ocean and atmosphere.
A study by Sheesley et al. (2004, 156084) illustrated the value ofbioassay procedures
to provide an initial screening of ambient PM toxicity. They used two species of green algae
and two extraction methods to compare the toxicities of atmospheric PM collected at two
urban/industrial sites and one rural site near the southern shore of Lake Michigan.
Toxicities varied by site, by extraction solvent, and by bioassay. Results suggested that
toxicity was not related to the total mass of PM in the extract, but to the chemical
July 2009
9-247
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
components of the PM. It is noteworthy that the concentrations of contaminants in PM in
this type of short-term and acute toxicity testing are much higher than would be found in
the natural environment. Thus, the purpose of this type of testing is to provide an initial
screening-level comparison of relative toxicities of atmospheric PM from different source
areas. It does not provide the data that would be needed to assess risk (Sheesley et al.,
2004,156084)-
9.4.5.6. Effects on Animals
There has been little work focusing on animal indicators of PM effects in the field.
However, there have been several recent studies on snails, amphibians, earthworms, and
bivalves that are discussed below.
Bioindicator organisms can be especially useful for monitoring PM effects over
geographical and temporal scales. Terrestrial invertebrates have been used to monitor
contaminants in both air and soil. Snails {Helix spp.) accumulate trace metals and
agrochemicals, and can be used as effective biomonitors for urban air pollution (Beeby and
Richmond, 2002, 155680)(Viard et al., 2004, 055675)(Regoli et al., 2006, 156046).
Demonstrated biological effects include growth inhibition, impairment of reproduction, and
induction of metallothioneins that are involved in metal detoxification (Gomot'de Vaufleury
and Kerhoas, 2000,155798)(Regoli et al., 2006, 156046). The use of sentinel species to
detect the effects of complex mixtures of air pollutants is of particular value because the
chemical constituents are difficult to characterize, exhibit varying bioavailability, and are
subject to various synergistic effects.
Regoli et al. (2006, 156046) caged land snails (Helix aspersa) at five locations in the
urban areas of Ancona, Italy. After four weeks of exposure to ambient air pollution, the
snails were analyzed for trace metals and PAHs. Biomarkers were measured that
correlated with contaminant accumulation, including concentrations of metallothioneins,
activity of biotransformation enzymes, and peroxisomal proliferation. In addition,
indicators of oxidative stress were measured, such as oxyradical scavenging capacity, onset
of cellular damage, and loss of DNA integrity. Results documented substantial
accumulation of metals and PAHs in snail digestive tissues in urban areas having high
traffic congestion. Cellular reactivity was also found, suggesting that this species is an
effective bioindicator for multipollutant air quality and PM monitoring.
July 2009
9-248
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Some amphibian ecotoxicological research has focused on heavy metal exposure.
Contaminant uptake can occur by oral, pulmonary, and dermal exposure (Lambert, 1997,
155916)(Johnson et al., 1999, 155880)(James et al., 2004, 155874). This is potentially
important because of documented declines in amphibian populations in the U.S. and
elsewhere in recent decades (Houlahan et al., 2000, 155853). Toads were shown to be fairly
tolerant of Cd exposure (James et al., 2004, 155874). It is not clear whether current
amounts of terrestrial metal contamination pose an increased risk to amphibians in
general.
Estuarine and marine bivalves provide potential bioindicators for Hg
bioaccumulation. For example, Coelho et al. (2006, 190181) investigated Hg concentrations
in Scrobiculariaplana, a long-lived, deposit-feeding bivalve in southern Europe. Annual
bioaccumulation rates were shown to be strongly correlated with Hg concentrations in
suspended particulate matter (SPM), a response to their deposit-feeding tactics (Verdelhos
et al., 2005, 190497). The ability to predict annual accumulation rates for indicator species,
such as this bivalve, may facilitate management actions to avoid deleterious effects on
humans through consumption of bivalves above a certain age/size class.
Earthworms often constitute a large percentage of soil animal biomass and they are
considered to be relatively sensitive indicators of soil metal contamination. They are
continuously exposed to the soil via dermal contact in the soil solution or ingestion of large
quantities of soil pore water, polluted food and/or soil particles (Lanno et al., 2004, 190415).
Hobbelen et al. (2006, 190371) determined the important metal pools for bioaccumulation
by earthworms Lumbricus rubellus, which live in the upper 5cm of soil and Aporrectodea
caliginosa, which live in the upper 25 cm of soil. Soil concentration explained much of
earthworm concentrations, however Cd concentration in A. calinginosa was best explained
by pore water concentrations and no variable tested explained Zn tissue concentrations.
Massicotte et al. (2003, 155968) compared the cell viability and phagocytic potential of
three earthworm species (Lumbricus terrestris, Eisenia andrei, and Aporrectodea
tuberculata) in response to atmospheric emissions of metals from a cement factory in
Quebec, Canada. Cell viability actually increased in proximity (0.5 km) to the cement
factory for A. tuberculata, and this might have been due to beneficial effects of increased Ca
deposition. There were no significant differences observed for the other two species
(Massicotte et al., 2003, 155968).
July 2009
9-249
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Biogeochemical cycling of Hg in the Arctic has been investigated, in part because
observed Hg concentrations in marine animals may pose health risks for local human
populations. The lifetime of gaseous elemental Hg (GEM) in the atmosphere, which
constitutes about 95% of atmospheric Hg, is generally about 1-yr (Lin and Pehkonen, 1999,
190426). However, during spring (typically March through June), the lifetime of GEM in
the Arctic is much shorter, and atmospheric GEM can be depleted in less than one day
during atmospheric Hg depletion episodes (MADE) (Lindberg et al., 2002, 190429) (Skov et
al., 2004, 190481). During the AMDE, GEM is rapidly oxidized to reactive gaseous Hg that
can be deposited to the ground surface (Skov et al., 2004, 190481). Because of the increased
solar flux to the Arctic during spring and seasonal melting of sea ice, there may be an
increased efficiency of Hg bio accumulation in Arctic food webs than would be expected
based on data collected at mid-latitudes. Skov et al. (2004, 190481) developed a simple
parameterization for AMDE and included it in the Danish Eulerian Hemispheric Model
(DEHM). The model was shown to reproduce the general structure of AMDE, suggesting
that the limiting factor for AMDE may be the surface temperature of sea ice.
9.4.5.7. Biomagnification across trophic levels
Biomagnification is the progressive accumulation of chemicals with increasing trophic
level (LeBlanc, 1995, 155921). Organic Hg is the most likely metal to biomagnify, in part
because organisms can efficient assimilate methylmercury and it is slowly eliminated
(Croteau et al., 2005, 156373; Reinfelder et al., 1998, 156047). Of the trace metals, there is
also evidence that Cd, Pb, Zn, Cu and Se biomagnify.
The study of trophic transfer and biomagnification is limited by the difficulty in
discriminating food webs and the uncertainty associated with assignment of trophic
position to individual species (Croteau et al., 2005, 156373). Use of stable isotopes can help
to establish linkages. However, it is difficult to determine the extent to which
biomagnification occurs in a given ecosystem without thoroughly investigating physiological
biodynamics, habitat, food web structure, and trophic position of relevant species. Thus,
development of an understanding of ecosystem complexity is necessary to determine what
species might be at greatest risk from toxic metal exposure (Croteau et al., 2005, 156373).
July 2009
9-250
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Terrestrial
Bioaccumulation of heavy metals can occur through the plant-herbivore and
litter-detrivore food webs. The U.S. EPA (2004, 056905) concluded that Cd and Zn can
bioaccumulate in earthworms. Other invertebrates inhabiting soil litter may also
accumulate metals. Although food web accumulation of a metal may not result in mortality,
it might reduce breeding potential or result in other non-lethal effects that adversely affect
organism responses to environmental cues.
Metal accumulation in litter can be found mainly around brass works and Pb and Zn
smelters. Organisms that feed on earthworms living in soils with elevated metal
concentrations may also accumulate Pb and Zn. Increased concentrations of heavy metals
have been found in a variety of mammals living in areas with elevated heavy metal
concentrations in the soils.
The transfer of metals from plants to terrestrial snails is an interesting system for
biomagnifications because snails accumulate metals in their soft tissue and can contribute
significantly to the transfer of pollutants to primary consumers and terrestrial predators
(Dallinger et al., 2001, 192109). Notten et al. (2005, 190461) studied the transfer of Cu, Zn,
Cd and Pb in terrestrial soil-plant-snail food chains in metal-polluted soils of the
Netherlands. The food chain included perennial plant species Urtica dioica and the
herbivorous snail Cepaea nemoralis. The transfer of metal from the soil to the plant
compartment was low (coefficient of determination R2 = 0.20). Total concentration of metals
in soils was a poor predictor of leaf concentration. Low metal concentration in the leaves
was thought to be due to low pore water metal concentrations and was also thought to be
partly caused by low translocation from roots within the plant. The Cu, Zn and Cd
concentrations in the snails were always higher than concentrations in the leaves
indicating bioaccumulation. The metal transfer from the leaf to snail was highest among all
routes tested, suggesting that transfer from diet is important. Similar results were found by
Beeby and Richmond (2002, 155680) with the snail Helix aspersa and the plant Taraxacum
sp. for Zn, Pb, Cd, but not for Cu.
Many types of predators including shrews, thrushes and beetle larvae include snails
as part of their diet (Gomot-De Vaufleury and Pihan, 2002, 190357; Seifert et al., 1999,
190480). Seifert et al. (1999, 190480) found the shrews eating snails with elevated Cd had
critical levels of Cd in their kidneys. Scheifler et al. (2007, 190379) found that Cd in snails
lead to toxic levels in beetle larvae that caused increased amounts of mortality.
July 2009
9-251
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Aquatic
In general, it has been assumed that metal biomagnification in aquatic ecosystems is
an exception rather than the rule (Gray, 2002, 155806). More recent research has
demonstrated aquatic biomagnification of certain metals. For example, Stewart et al. (2004,
156097) used stable isotopes of C and N to show biomagnification of Se in San Francisco
Bay food webs. Croteau et al. (2005, 156373) identified trophic position of estuarine
organisms and food web structure in the delta of San Francisco Bay to document Cd
biomagnification in invertebrates that live on macrophytes and also in fish. Concentrations
of Cd were biomagnified 15 times within two trophic links in each food web. In contrast, no
tendency towards biomagnification was observed for Cu.
In aquatic ecosystems, biomagnification of trace metals does not necessarily occur.
Nguyen et al. (2005, 155997) found biodiminution for most metals in Lake Balaton,
Hungary, with the exception of slight enrichment of Zn from PM to zooplankton and of Cd
from sediment to mussel.
Once transported to aquatic ecosystems, trace metals often preferentially bind to
sediment particles. Some of these sediment-bound metals may be unavailable to biota! in
contrast, metals bound to sediment organic matter may exhibit varying degrees of
bioavailability (Di Toro et al., 2005, 155750). Piol et al. (2006, 156028) studied the
bioavailability of sediment-bound Cd to the freshwater oligochaete Lumbriculus variegatus.
They found that Cd uptake depended on the amount of free dissolved Cd(II), and the Cd
contribution from sedimentary particles to biological uptake was negligible.
Marine bivalve mollusks bioaccumulate trace metals and other contaminants
(LaBrecque et al., 2004, 155913) and therefore may be used as bioindicators of
contamination. In addition, they constitute an important link to human health by virtue of
their importance as a food source (Cheggour et al., 2005, 155723! Li et al., 2002, 156691).
9.4.5.8. Effects near Smelters and Roadsides
The high PM concentrations in proximity to mining, smelting, roadsides and other
industrial sources result in heavy metal loadings that may be particularly damaging to
nearby ecosystems.
July 2009
9-252
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Smelters
The Harjavalta region is one of the most intensively studied heavy metal polluted
areas in the world. Kiikkila et al. (2003, 156637) reviewed available data on heavy metal
deposition and environmental effects in this area. Emissions from the smelter were as high
as 1100 t/yr of dust, 140 t/yr Cu, 96 t/yr Ni, 162 t/yr Zn, and 94 t/yr Pb in 1987. Deposition
amounts decreased substantially after 1990, to only a few percent of the amounts that
occurred during the 1980s.
Kiikkila (2003, 156637) investigated the effects of heavy metal pollution in proximity
to a Cu-Ni smelter at Harjavalta, Finland. The deposition of heavy metals increased within
30 km of the smelter. Only slight changes in the understory vegetation were observed at
distances greater than 8 km from the smelter. At 4 km distance, species composition of
vegetation, insects, birds, and soil microbiota changed and tree growth was reduced. Within
about 1 km, only the most resistant organisms were surviving.
The number of soil organisms clearly decreased and their community structure was
altered close to the Harjavalta smelter (Kiikkila, 2003, 156637). However, this effect was
only pronounced within about 2 km of the smelter. This suggests that the soil microfauna
are relatively resistant to metal pollution effects.
Soil microbial activity decreased close to the Harjavalta smelter (Kiikkila, 2003,
156637), as reflected by microbial respiration, distribution of species within physiological
groups, and microbial and fungal biomass. The fungi appeared to be more sensitive to metal
contamination than the bacteria (Pennanen et al., 1996, 156016). The rate of litter
decomposition decreased, causing an accumulation of needle litter on top of the forest floor
near the smelter (Fritze et al., 1989, 079635).
Inhibition of nutrient cycling and displacement by Cu and Ni of base cations from
cation exchange sites on the soil resulted in a decrease in base cation concentrations in the
organic soil layer (Derome and Lindroos, 1998, 155749; Kiikkila, 2003, 156637) close to the
Harjavalta smelter. In addition, Mg, Ca, and Mn concentrations in Scots pine needles were
low, and this was attributed by Kiikkila (2003, 156637) to the toxic effects of Cu and Ni to
plant fine roots and also to ectomycorrhizal root tips (Helmisaari et al., 1999, 155836).
Nutrient translocation during fall was also affected close to the smelter! as a consequence
needle concentrations of K were relatively high (Nieminen et al., 1999, 155998).
Tree growth (Scots pine) has been poor (Malkonen et al., 1999, 155961) and most
vegetation was absent within 0.5 km of the smelter. Effects on plant species occurrence
July 2009
9-253
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
close to the smelter were almost entirely negative. In contrast, some animal species
responded positively, including a leaf miner, three species of aphid, and some ants, beetles,
and spiders.
Salemaa et al. (2004, 156069) investigated heavy metal concentrations in understory
plant species growing at varying distances from the Harjavalta Cu-Ni smelter. Heavy metal
concentrations (except Mn) were highest in bryophytes, followed by lichens, and were
lowest in vascular plants. Vascular plants are generally able to restrict the uptake of toxic
elements, and therefore were able to grow closer to the smelter than lichens. A pioneer moss
(Pohlia nutans) was unusual in that it survived close to the smelter despite its
accumulation of high amounts of Cu and Ni.
Changes in breeding success of cavity-nesting passerine birds close to the Harjavalta
smelter were attributed by Kiikkila (2003, 156637) to habitat changes in response to metal
toxicity. In particular, there was an apparent decrease in the proportion of green insect
larvae in the diet of nestlings. In addition, pollution stress was inferred from increased
heavy metals and decreased Ca in the diet of the pied fly catcher (Ficedula hypoleuca)
(Eeva et al., 2000, 155761).
Documentation of effects on individual species, such as was reported above, does not
reveal what the impacts might be on ecosystem function. Nevertheless, the mere fact that
multiple species, operating at different trophic levels, have been shown to be affected by the
ambient deposition in proximity to the smelter suggests that effects on ecosystem function
may indeed have occurred. More research is needed, however, to fully evaluate effects on
function as opposed to abundance of individual species.
Roadsides
Heavy metal particles are important constituents of road dust. These particles
accumulate on the road surface from brake linings, road paint, tire debris, DE, road
construction materials, and catalyst materials. Road dust can be suspended in the
atmosphere and contribute metals to soil, air, and urban runoff (Adachi and Tainosho, 2004,
081380; Davis et al., 2001, 024933; Smolders and Degryse, 2002, 156091). In particular, Zn
oxide comprises 0.4 to 4.3% of tire tread (Smolders and Degryse, 2002, 156091) and tire
wear is a substantial source of environmental Zn pollution. Adachi and Tainosho (2004,
081380) used a field emission screening electron microscope equipped with an energy
dispersive x-ray spectrometer to characterize heavy metal particles embedded in tire dust.
July 2009
9-254
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Samples were classified into four likely source categories, based on cluster analysis. Based
on morphology and chemical composition, the samples were identified as having derived
from yellow paint (CrPbCh particles), brake dust (particulate Ti, Fe, Cu, Sb, Zr, Ba and
heavy minerals [Y, Zr, La, Ce]), and tire tread (Zn oxide).
Since publication of EPA's 2004 PM criteria assessment, some additional research has
been conducted on the effects of windblown PM. Effects on physical, chemical, and
biological attributes of both plants and animals have been documented (Englert, 2004,
087939; Gleason et al., 2007, 155794; Kappos et al., 2004, 087922). Experiments by Gleason
et al. (Gleason et al., 2007, 155794) suggest that most direct effects on plants of windblown
PM originating from on-road surfaces occur within 40 m of the source. Windblown PM from
roads or agriculture can cover plant photosynthetic structures (Sharifi et al., 1999, 156082),
cause impact damage (Armbrust and Retta, 2002, 156225), or interfere with physiological
mechanisms (Burkhardt et al., 2002, 155708). As previously discussed in Section 9.4.4.6
land snails in urban areas have been shown to be a good indicator of traffic pollution.
9.4.6. Organic Compounds
VOCs in the atmosphere are partitioned between the gas and particle phases. As
described by the U.S. EPA (2004, 056905), the partitioning depends on vapor pressure,
temperature, surface area of the particles, and the nature of the particles and of the
chemical being adsorbed. A wide variety of organic contaminants are deposited from the
atmosphere. These include chemicals such as DDT, PCBs, and PAHs.
Important organic atmospheric contaminants are generally those that are transported
long distances in the atmosphere, subsequently deposited into remote locations, and
bioaccumulated to sufficient concentrations that they can affect humans, wildlife, or other
biota (Swackhamer et al., 2004, 190488). Certain physical and chemical properties facilitate
the movement of these contaminants from land and water surfaces into the atmosphere,
provide stability, and enhance accumulation in lipids. Some, including the relatively small
(up to 4 rings) PAHs degrade relatively rapidly in the atmosphere or at the surface
subsequent to atmospheric deposition. Below is a summary of the findings of the U.S. EPA
(2004, 056905), followed by discussion of more recent research findings.
Plants may be used as passive monitors to compare the deposition of organic
compounds between sites. Vegetation can be used semi-quantitatively to indicate organic
pollutant amounts if the mechanism of accumulation is considered. Organic compounds can
July 2009
9-255
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
enter the plant via the roots or be deposited as particles on the leaves and be taken up
through the cuticle or stomata. The pathways depend on the chemical and its physical
properties. These include, for example, lipophilicity, water solubility, vapor pressure, and
Henry's law constant. Environmental conditions can also be important, including
temperature and organic content of soil, plant species, and the foliar surface area and lipid
content.
Organic particulates in the atmosphere are diverse in their makeup and sources.
Vegetation itself is an important source of hydrocarbon aerosols. Terpenes, particularly
a-pinene, 6-pinene, and limonene, released from tree foliage may react in the atmosphere to
form submicron particles. These naturally generated organic particles contribute
significantly to the blue haze aerosols formed naturally over forested areas (Geron et al.,
2000, 019095; U.S. EPA, 2004, 056905).
The low water solubility and high lipo-affinity of many organic xenobiotics control
their interaction with the vegetative components of natural ecosystems. Foliar surfaces are
covered with a waxy cuticle layer that helps reduce moisture loss and short-wave radiation
stress. This epicuticular wax consists largely of long-chain esters, polyesters, and paraffins,
which accumulate lipophilic compounds. Organic air contaminants in the particulate or
vapor phase can be adsorbed to, and accumulate in, the epicuticular wax of leaf surfaces.
Direct uptake of organic contaminants through the cuticle and vapor-phase uptake through
the stomata are not well characterized for most trace organics.
Topographic and vegetative characteristics exert different influence on deposition
modes. In general, dry deposition is most affected by plant morphology (Grantz et al., 2003,
155805). The potential effects of PM on vegetation include the full range of biological
organization, with exposures occurring through the soil and through vegetative surfaces. In
general, soil-mediated exposure is thought to be more significant (Grantz et al., 2003,
155805). Soil acts as an important storage compartment for POPs, including PCBs and
PAHs. There is a continuous process of partitioning between the soil pool and the
atmosphere, and this controls the regional and global transport of these compounds (Backe
et al., 2004, 155668; Wania and Mackay, 1993, 157110). Over time, POPs move towards
equilibrium between the environmental compartments, and this process can be described
using the fugacity concept (Backe et al., 2004, 155668; Mackay, 1991, 042941). Fugacity
reflects the tendency of a chemical constituent to escape one environmental compartment
and move to another. When an equilibrium distribution is achieved, the fugacity quotient
July 2009
9-256
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
values in each compartment will be equal. Soil/air partitioning is controlled by a variety of
factors. These include soil properties, such as organic matter content, moisture, porosity,
texture, and structure, as well as the physiochemical properties of the pollutant, including
vapor pressure and water solubility.
The accumulation of PAHs in vegetation, due to their lipophilic nature, could
contribute to human and other animal exposure via food consumption. As a result, plant
uptake of PAHs has been an important area of research (Gao and Zhu, 2004, 155782). Most
bioaccumulation of PAHs by plants occurs by leaf uptake (Tao et al., 2006, 156112). Root
uptake also occurs. It appears that roots preferentially accumulate the lower molecular
weight PAHs due to their greater water solubility (Wild and Jones, 1992, 156155).
Various models have been developed to simulate plant uptake of organic
contaminants. The simple partition-limited model of Chiou et al. (2001, 156342) has been
further expanded to increase complexity and to include root uptake pathways (e.g., Fryer
and Collins, 2003, 156454; Yang et al., 2005, 192104; Zhu et al., 2004, 156184).
In evaluating receptor choice for studies of contaminant exposure to plants, and also
remediation potential, it is important to consider differences among species. For example,
Parrish et al. (2006, 156014) assessed the bioavailability of PAHs in soil. During the first
growing season, zucchini (Cucurbitapepo ssp. pepo) accumulated significantly more PAHs
than did other related plant species, including up to three orders of magnitude greater
concentrations of the six-ring PAHs. Parrish et al. (2006, 156014) also noted differences in
PAH uptake by two different species of earthworm.
The leaves of Quercus ilex have been shown to readily accumulate PAHs in situ.
Young leaves accumulated PAHs within three weeks of bud break. Mature leaves showed
seasonality, with higher PAH concentrations during winter (Alfani et al., 2005, 154319).
It is difficult to discriminate between PAHs that are adsorbed to plant root surfaces as
opposed to those that are actually taken up by the roots. In general, soil bound PAHs are
associated with soil organic matter and are therefore not readily available for root uptake
(Fismes et al., 2002, 141156; Jiao et al., 2007, 155879). Wild et al. (2005, 156156) used
two-photon excitation microscopy to visualize the uptake and transport of two PAHs
(anthracene and phenanthrene) from a contaminated soil into living wheat and maize roots.
Jiao et al. (2007, 155879) developed a sequential extraction method to discriminate between
PAH adsorption in rice roots.
July 2009
9-257
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Maize roots and tops of plants have been shown to directly accumulate PAHs from
aqueous solution and from air in proportion to exposure amounts. Root concentration
factors are log-linear functions of log-based octanol-water partition coefficients (log Kow);
similarly, leaf concentration factors are log-linear functions of log-based octanol-air
partition coefficients (log Koa) (Lin et al., 2007, 155933). Although the bulk concentrations of
PAHs in various plant tissues can differ greatly, the observed differences disappear after
they are normalized to lipid content (Lin et al., 2007, 155933). This suggests that the lipid
content of different plant tissues may influence PAH distribution within the plant.
Previously, there was relatively little information available regarding incorporation of
atmospherically deposited PAHs into aquatic food webs. It is known that PAHs can be
transferred to higher trophic levels, including fish, and that this transfer can be mediated
by aquatic invertebrates, which generally comprise an important part of fish diets. High
mountain lakes offer an effective receptor for quantification of biomagnification in aquatic
ecosystems from atmospheric PM deposition. There are typically no sources of organic
contaminants in their watersheds, and atmospheric inputs dominate as sources of
contamination. In addition, such lakes tend to have relatively simple food webs. Vives et al.
(2005, 157099) investigated PAH content of brown trout (Salmo trutta) and their food items.
Total PAH concentrations tended to be highest in organisms that occupy littoral habitats,
and lowest in pelagic organisms. This may reflect more efficient transfer of PAHs to
underlying sediments in shallower water and associated degradation within the water
column.
Some atmospheric organic contaminants have been shown to accumulate in biota at
remote locations. For example, polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), which are man-
made chemicals used as flame retardants in materials manufacturing, have been found to
accumulate in lichens and mosses collected at King George Island, maritime Antarctica
(Yogui and Sericano, 2008, 189971). Because contaminant concentrations were not
statistically different at sites close to and distant from human facilities in Antarctica, the
authors concluded that long-range atmospheric transport was the likely primary source of
PBDEs to King George Island. Law et al. (2003, 190420) reviewed available data for
accumulation of PBDEs and other brominated flame retardants in wildlife. These
compounds have become widely distributed in the environment, including in the deep-
water, oceanic food webs.
July 2009
9-258
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Ohyama et al. (2004, 190462) chose salmonid fish, mainly rainbow trout
(Oncorhyncus mykiss), as an indicator species to evaluate the transport and
bioaccumulation of organochloride compounds in the northern and central Sierra Nevada.
They found that elevation was an important factor affecting residual concentrations of
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in fish muscle tissue. On this basis, Ohyama et al. (2004,
190462) concluded that PCB residue in rainbow trout, a widely distributed salmonid
species, provided a good monitoring tool for studying the effects of mountainous topography
on the long-range transport and distribution of persistent organic pollutants.
Semivolatile compounds can undergo repeated volatilization on surfaces, such as
plant foliage, in response to diel changes in temperature. As a consequence, such
compounds can be deposited, re-emitted, and re-deposited multiple times. This behavior can
cause these compounds to move large distances in a leap-frog fashion. It is believed that
POPs can be atmospherically transported throughout the world because of their volatility
and response to changes in temperature. This "global distillation theory" (Holmqvist et al.,
2006, 190380; Wania and Mackay, 1993, 157110) predicts that POPs in the northern
hemisphere are generally transported towards the Arctic, and in the southern hemisphere
they are transported toward the Antarctic. In general, POP concentrations measured in the
Arctic are higher than in the Antarctic. They have been detected in all levels of the Arctic
food web (Oehme et al., 1995, 011267). Bioconcentration of organochlorines has been shown
in the Arctic food web, including fish, seals, and polar bears (Oehme et al., 1995, 011267).
Concentrations measured in Arctic polar bears are especially high (Arctic Monitoring and
Assessment Programme, 2004, 190168).
Holmqvist et al. (2006, 190380) measured levels of PCBs in longfin eels (Anguilla
dieffenbachil) in 17 streams on the west coast of South Island, New Zealand. The PCBs
were at low levels, and were believed to originate from atmospheric transport from
industrial areas in Asia. Characteristics of the longfin eel that make it susceptible to
bioaccumulation of lipophilic persistent pollutants include high lipid content (up to 40%),
long lifespan (up to 90 yr), and position near the top of the food chain (Holmqvist et al.,
2006, 190380).
Long-range transport of atmospherically deposited contaminants can be augmented
by biotransport. A good example of this phenomenon was documented by Ewald et al. (1998,
190348), who showed that biotransport by migrating sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka)
in the Copper River watershed, Alaska, had a greater influence than atmospheric transport
July 2009
9-259
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
on bioaccumulation of PCBs and DDT in lake food webs. Organic pollutants accumulated by
salmon during their ocean residence were effectively transferred 410 km inland to their
spawning lake. Arctic grayling (Thymallus arcticus) in the salmon spawning lake were
found to contain organic pollutants more than twice as high as arctic grayling in a near-by
salmon-free lake. The pollutant composition of the grayling in the salmon spawning lake
was similar to that of the migrating salmon (Ewald et al., 1998, 190348). suggesting that
salmon migration contributed to bioaccumulation of organic contaminants in the lake used
for spawning by the salmon.
An assessment of the ecological effects of airborne metals and SOCs was conducted for
eight NPs by the Western Airborne Contaminants Assessment Project (WACAP) (Landers et
al., 2008, 191181). From 2002-2007, WACAP researchers conducted analysis of the
biological effects of airborne contaminants in seven ecosystem compartments^ air, snow,
water, sediments, lichens, conifer needles and fish. The goals were to identify where the
pollutants were accumulating, identify ecological indicators for those pollutants causing
ecological harm, and to determine the source of the air masses most likely to have
transported the contaminants to the parks.
The results from WACAP were summarized by Landers et al. (2008, 191181). which
concluded that bioaccumulation of SOCs were observed throughout park ecosystems.
Vegetation tended to accumulate PAHs, CUPs, and HCHs. Conifer needles were a good
indicator of pesticides, however the ecological consequences of this accumulation are un-
examined. SOCs in vegetation and air showed different patterns, possibly because each
medium absorbs different types of SOCs with varying efficiencies. Mean ammonium nitrate
concentration in ambient fine particulates <2.5 urn diameter was a good predictor of
dacthal, endosulfan, chloradane, trifluralin, DDT and PAH concentrations in vegetation.
Concentrations of SOCs were five to seven orders of magnitude higher in fish tissue
than in sediments. Fish accumulated more PCBs, chlordanes, DDT and dieldrin than
vegetation. Fish lipid and age were the most reliable predictors of SOC concentrations.
Most fish appeared normal during field necropsies! however, individuals with both male
and female reproductive organs were collected at two sites. The incidence of this condition
has increased since the pre-organic pollutant era. Additionally, elevated concentrations of
vitellogenin, a female protein involved in egg production, were found in male fish from
three sites, and directly related to the concentration of several organochlorines at one site.
July 2009
9-260
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
The lake sediment records showed steadily increasing mercury deposition over time at
lakes in two parks, Mt. Ranier NP and Rocky Mountain NR Apportionment of the mercury
to its atmospheric sources is not quantified at this time! however, the pattern in the
sediment suggests a local source rather than a global source. Mercury concentrations in fish
exceeded contaminant health thresholds for some piscivorous fish, mammals and birds in
most parks. The average mercury concentration in fish from one site and individual fish
from three additional sites exceeded the U.S. EPA contaminant health thresholds for
humans.
Although this assessment focuses on chemical species that are components of PM it
does not specifically assess the effects of particulate vs. gas-phase forms, therefore in most
cases it is difficult to apply the results to this assessment based on particulate
concentration and size fraction.
9.4.7. Summary of Ecological Effects of PM
Ecological effects of PM include direct effects to metabolic processes of plant foliage!
contribution to total metal loading resulting in alteration of soil biogeochemistry, plant and
animal growth and reproduction! and contribution to total organics loading resulting in
bioaccumulation and biomagnification across trophic levels. These effects were well-
characterized in the 2004 PM AQCD (U.S. EPA, 2004, 056905). Thus, the summary below
builds upon the conclusions provided in that review.
PM deposition comprises a heterogeneous mixture of particles differing in origin, size,
and chemical composition. Exposure to a given concentration of PM may, depending on the
mix of deposited particles, lead to a variety of phytotoxic responses and ecosystem effects.
Moreover, many of the ecological effects of PM are due to the chemical constituents (e.g.,
metals and organics) and their contribution to total loading within an ecosystem.
Investigations of the direct effects of PM deposition on foliage have suggested little or
no effects on foliar processes, unless deposition levels were higher than is typically found in
the ambient environment. However, consistent and coherent evidence of direct effects of PM
has been found in heavily polluted areas adjacent to industrial point sources such as
limestone quarries, cement kilns, and metal smelters (Sections 9.4.3. and 9.4.5.8.). Where
toxic responses have been documented, they generally have been associated with the
acidity, trace metal content, surfactant properties, or salinity of the deposited materials.
July 2009
9-261
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
An important characteristic of fine particles is their ability to affect the flux of solar
radiation passing through the atmosphere directly, by scattering and absorbing solar
radiation, and, indirectly, by acting as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) that, in turn,
influence the optical properties of clouds. Regional haze has been estimated to diminish
surface solar visible radiation. Crop yields can be sensitive to the amount of sunlight
received, and crop losses have been attributed to increased airborne particle concentrations
in some areas of the world. PM has been observed to cause a decrease in photosynthetically
active radiation (PAR) via thick haze occurring in China that decreases plant growth in the
diffuse light portion of PAR. However, a global model showed that PM can increase the
diffuse light fraction of PAR. On a global scale, the diffuse light fraction of PAR has been
shown to increase growth. Consequently, it was shown that when PM is decreased, plant
growth and C storage are also decreased. Further research is needed to determine net
effects of PM alteration of light conditions on the growth of vegetation in the U.S.
The deposition of PM onto vegetation and soil, depending on its chemical composition,
can produce responses within an ecosystem. The ecosystem response to pollutant deposition
is a direct function of the level of sensitivity of the ecosystem and its ability to ameliorate
resulting change. Many of the most important ecosystem effects of PM deposition occur in
the soil. Upon entering the soil environment, PM pollutants can alter ecological processes of
energy flow and nutrient cycling, inhibit nutrient uptake, change ecosystem structure, and
affect ecosystem biodiversity. The soil environment is one of the most dynamic sites of
biological interaction in nature. It is inhabited by microbial communities of bacteria, fungi,
and actinomycetes, in addition to plant roots and soil macro-fauna. These organisms are
essential participants in the nutrient cycles that make elements available for plant uptake.
Changes in the soil environment can be important in determining plant and ultimately
ecosystem response to PM inputs.
There is strong and consistent evidence from field and laboratory experiments that
metal components of PM alter numerous aspects of ecosystem structure and function.
Changes in the soil chemistry, microbial communities and nutrient cycling, can result from
the deposition of trace metals. Exposures to trace metals are highly variable, depending on
whether deposition is by wet or dry processes. Although metals can cause phytotoxicity at
high concentrations, few heavy metals (e.g., Cu, Ni, Zn) have been documented to cause
direct phytotoxicity under field conditions. Exposure to coarse particles and elements such
as Fe and Mg are more likely to occur via dry deposition, while fine particles are more likely
July 2009
9-262
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
to contain elements such as Ca, Cr, Pb, Ni, and V. Ecosystems immediately downwind of
major emissions sources can receive locally heavy deposition inputs. Phytochelatins
produced by plants as a response to sublethal concentrations of heavy metals are indicators
of metal stress to plants. Increased concentrations of phytochelatins across regions and at
greater elevation have been associated with increased amounts of forest injury in the
northeastern U.S.
Overall, the ecological evidence is sufficient to conclude that a causal relationship is
likely to exist between deposition of PM and a variety of effects on individual organisms and
ecosystems, based on information from the previous review and limited new findings in this
review. However, in many cases, it is difficult to characterize the nature and magnitude of
effects and to quantify relationships between ambient concentrations of PM and ecosystem
response due to significant data gaps and uncertainties as well as considerable variability
that exists in the components of PM and their various ecological effects.
9.5. Effects on Materials
Effects of air pollution on materials are related to both aesthetic appeal and physical
damage. Deposited particles, primarily carbonaceous compounds, cause soiling of building
materials and culturally important items, such as statues and works of art. Physical
damage from dry deposition of PM also can accelerate natural weathering processes. The
major deterioration phenomenon affecting building materials in response to atmospheric
deposition is probably sulfation, leading to secondary salt crystallization which forms
gypsum (Marinoni et al., 2003, 092520).
This section (a) summarizes information on exposure-related effects on materials
associated with particulate pollutants as addressed in the 2004 PM AQCD (U.S. EPA, 2004,
056905) and (b) presents relevant information derived from very limited research conducted
and published since completion of that document. Most recent work on this topic has been
conducted outside the U.S.
There is a variety of factors that contribute to the deterioration of monuments and
buildings of cultural significance. They include^ (l) biodeterioration processes! (2)
weathering of materials exposed to the air! and (3) air pollution from both anthropogenic
and natural sources (Herrera and Videla, 2004, 155843). Because of the diversity in climate,
July 2009
9-263
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
proximity to marine aerosol sources, and pollution of various types, the magnitude and
relative importance of these causal agents vary by location.
Much existing literature on damage to structural materials of cultural heritage has
not seriously considered the importance of biodeterioration processes and the relationship
that often exists between environmental characteristics and the microbial communities
that colonize monuments and buildings. In general, high humidity, high temperature, and
air pollution often enhance the biodeterioration hazard. Herrera and Videla (2004, 155843)
concluded that heterotrophic bacteria, fungi, and cyanobacteria were the main microbial
colonizers of buildings that they investigated in Latin America. Their analyses suggested
that the major deterioration mechanism of limestone at the Mayan site of Uxmal in a
non-polluted rural environment was biosolubilization induced by metabolic acids produced
by bacteria and fungi. The rock decay at Tulum, near the seashore, was mainly attributed
to the marine influence. At Medellin, it appeared that biodeterioration effects from microbes
synergistically enhanced the effects of atmospheric factors on material decay. Deterioration
of structural material in the Cathedral of La Plata, located in a mixed urban/industrial
environment, was attributed mainly to atmospheric pollutants (Herrera and Videla, 2004,
155843).
Ambient particles can cause soiling of man-made surfaces. Soiling generally is
considered an optical effect. Soiling changes the reflectance from opaque materials and
reduces the transmission of light through transparent materials. Soiling can represent a
significant detrimental effect, requiring increased frequency of cleaning of glass windows
and concrete structures, washing and repainting of structures, and, in some cases, reduces
the useful life of the object. Particles, especially carbon, may also help catalyze chemical
reactions that result in the deterioration of materials (U.S. EPA, 2004, 056905).
Soiling is dependent on atmospheric particle concentration, particle size distribution,
deposition rate, and the horizontal or vertical orientation and texture of the exposed surface
(Haynie, 1986, 157198). The chemical composition and morphology of the particles and the
optical properties of the surface being soiled will determine the time at which soiling is
perceived by human observers (Nazaroff and Cass, 1991, 044577).
Ferm et al. (2006, 155135) reported development of a simple passive particle collector
for estimating dry deposition to objects of cultural heritage. The observed mass of deposited
particles mainly belonged to the coarse particulate mode. The sampler collects particles
July 2009
9-264
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
from all directions. It replicates at least some of the complexity of particle deposition to
actual objects, and is easier to analyze than a precious object (Ferm et al., 2006, 155135).
Soiling of urban buildings constitutes a visual nuisance that leads to the loss of
architectural value. Soiling can include reversible darkening of the building surfaces and
also irreversible damage. Water runoff patterns on the building surfaces are influenced by
the type of surface material, architectural elements, and climate. Therefore, soiling does not
occur uniformly across the building. Public perception of soiling entails complex
interactions between the extent of soiling, architecture, and aesthetics (Grossi and
Brimblecombe, 2004, 155813).
One of the most significant air pollution damage features affecting urban buildings
and monuments is the formation of black crusts. Quantification of different forms of carbon
in black crusts is difficult. There is often a carbonate component which is derived from the
building material, plus OC and EC, derived from air pollution. EC is considered to be a
tracer for combustion sources, whereas OC may derive from multiple sources, including
atmospheric deposition of primary and secondary pollutants, and the decay of protective
organic treatments (Bonazza et al., 2005, 155695). Bonazza et al. (2005, 155695) quantified
OC and EC in damage layers on European cultural heritage structures. OC predominated
over EC at almost all locations investigated. Traffic appeared to be the major source of fine
carbonaceous particles, with organic matter as the main component (Putaud et al., 2004,
055545). Viles and Gorbushina (2003, 156138) found that soiling in Oxford, U.K. showed a
relationship with traffic and NO2 concentrations.
In addition to the soiling effects of EC, much soiling appears to be largely of
microbiological origin (Viles and Gorbushina, 2003, 156138). Microbial biofilms, composed
mainly of fungi, can stain exposed rock surfaces with yellow, orange, brown, gray, or black
colors. Microorganisms may be able to trap PM more efficiently than the stone surface
itself. In addition, microbial growth may be stimulated by organic or nutrient constituents
in PM deposition.
Viles et al. (2002, 156137) investigated the nature of soiling on limestone tablets in
relation to ambient air pollution and climate at 3 contrasting sites in Great Britain over
periods of 1-8 yr. Spectrophotometer and microscope observations suggested that there were
not consistent trends in soiling over time at the study sites. Each site behaved differently in
terms of the temporal development of soiling and the differences between sheltered and
July 2009
9-265
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
exposed limestone tablets. In addition, organisms played important roles in the soiling
response, even at the highly polluted site.
Some work has been conducted on public perception regarding the lightness of historic
buildings and the aesthetic need for cleaning subsequent to soiling by air pollution.
Brimblecombe and Grossi (2005, 155703) found a strong relationship between the perceived
lightness of a building and the opinion that it was dirty. This relationship was used to
establish levels of blackening that might be publicly acceptable.
Recently, the importance of organic contaminant deposition to the overall air pollution
damage to building materials has been recognized. Low molecular weight organic anions
such as formate, acetate, and oxalate are ubiquitous in black crusts in damage layers on
stones and mortars sampled from monuments and buildings throughout Europe (Sabbioni
et al., 2003, 049282). This has been observed at urban, suburban, and rural sites.
9.5.1. Effects on Paint
Studies have evaluated the soiling effects of particles on painted surfaces (U.S. EPA,
2004, 056905). Particles composed of EC, acids, and various other constituents are
responsible for the soiling of structural painted surfaces. Coarse-mode particles (>2.5 pm)
initially contribute more soiling of horizontal and vertical painted surfaces than do
fine-mode particles (<2.5 pm), but are more easily removed by rain (Haynie and Lemmons,
1990, 044579). Rain interacts with coarse particles, dissolving the particle and leaving
stains on the painted surface (Creighton et al., 1990, 044578; Haynie and Lemmons, 1990,
044579). Particle deposition contributes to increased frequency of cleaning of painted
surfaces and physical damage to the painted surface. Air pollution affects the durability of
paint finishes by promoting discoloration, chalking, loss of gloss, erosion, blistering, and
peeling (U.S. EPA, 2004, 056905). There have been no new developments in this field
subsequent to the review of the U.S. EPA (2004, 056905).
9.5.2. Effects on Metal Surfaces
Metals undergo natural weathering processes. The effects of air pollutants on natural
weathering processes depend on the nature of the pollutant(s), the deposition rate, and the
presence of moisture (U.S. EPA, 2004, 056905). Pollutant effects on metal surfaces are
governed by such factors as the presence of protective corrosion films and surface
July 2009
9-266
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
electrolytes, the orientation of the metal surface, and surface moisture. Surface moisture
facilitates particulate deposition and promotes corrosive reactions. Formation of
hygroscopic salts increases the duration of surface wetness and enhances corrosion.
A corrosion film, such as for example the rust layer on a metal surface, provides some
protection against further corrosion. Its effectiveness in retarding the corrosion process is
affected by the solubility of the corrosion layer and the pollutant exposure. Other than the
effects of acidifying compounds, there has not been additional research conducted in recent
years on the effects of PM deposition on metal corrosion.
9.5.3. Effects on Stone
Air pollutants can enhance the natural weathering processes on building stone. The
development of crusts on stone monuments has been attributed to the interaction of the
stone's surface with pollutants, wet or dry deposition of atmospheric particles, and dry
deposition of gypsum particles. Because of a greater porosity and specific surface, mortars
have a high potential for reacting with environmental pollutants (Zappia et al., 1998,
012037).
Most research evaluating the effects of air pollutants on stone structures has
concentrated on gaseous pollutants (U.S. EPA, 2004, 056905). The dark color of gypsum is
attributed to soiling by carbonaceous particles. A lighter gray colored crust is attributed to
soil dust and metal deposits (Ausset et al., 1998, 040480; Camuffo, 1995, 076278; Lorusso et
al., 1997, 084534; Moropoulou et al., 1998, 040485). Lorusso et al. (1997, 084534) attributed
the need for frequent cleaning and restoration of historic monuments in Rome to exposure
to total suspended particulates.
Grossi et al. (2003, 155812) investigated the black soiling rates of building granite,
marble, and limestone in two urban environments with different climates. Horizontal
specimens were exposed, both sheltered and unsheltered from rainfall. Limestone showed
soiling proportional to the square root of the time of exposure, but granite and marble did
not.
Black soiling is caused mainly by particulate EC (PEC). For that reason, it is most
prevalent in urban environments due to the formation of carbonaceous fine particles from
the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels. Traffic emissions, especially from diesel engines,
and wood burning are important sources of PEC (Grossi et al., 2003, 155812).
July 2009
9-267
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Kamh (2005, 155888) studied the effects of weathering on Conway Castle, an
historical structure in Great Britain built about 1289 AC. The weathering was identified as
honeycomb, blackcrust, exfoliation, and discoloration, with white salt efflorescence at some
parts. These features are diagnostic for salt weathering (Goudie et al., 2002, 156486), and
this was confirmed by laboratory analyses, including scanning electron microscopy and
x-ray diffraction. The authors concluded that the salt was derived from three sources^ sea
spray, chemical alteration of the carbonate in mortar into SOr salts by acidic deposition,
and wet deposition of air pollutants on the stone surface. The salt content on the rock
surface fills the rock pores and then exerts high pressure on the rock texture due to
hydration of the salt in the cold humid environment. In particular, CaSCk and Na2S04 exert
enough pressure on hydration as to deteriorate construction rock at both the micro- and
macroscale (Moses and Smith, 1994, 156785).
9.5.4. Summary of Effects on Materials
Building materials (metals, stones, cements, and paints) undergo natural weathering
processes from exposure to environmental elements (wind, moisture, temperature
fluctuations, sunlight, etc.). Metals form a protective film of oxidized metal (e.g., rust) that
slows environmentally induced corrosion. However, the natural process of metal corrosion is
enhanced by exposure to anthropogenic pollutants. For example, formation of hygroscopic
salts increases the duration of surface wetness and enhances corrosion.
A significant detrimental effect of particle pollution is the soiling of painted surfaces
and other building materials. Soiling changes the reflectance of opaque materials and
reduces the transmission of light through transparent materials. Soiling is a degradation
process that requires remediation by cleaning or washing, and, depending on the soiled
surface, repainting. Particulate deposition can result in increased cleaning frequency of the
exposed surface and may reduce the usefulness of the soiled material. Attempts have been
made to quantify the pollutant exposure at which materials damage and soiling have been
perceived. However, to date, insufficient data are available to advance the knowledge
regarding perception thresholds with respect to pollutant concentration, particle size, and
chemical composition. Nevertheless, the evidence is sufficient to conclude that a causal
relationship exists between PM and effects on materials.
July 2009
9-268
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Chapter 9 References
Abdou W; Diner D; Martonchik J; Bruegge C; Kahn R; Gaitley B; Crean K; Remer L; Holben B. (2005).
Comparison of coincident Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer and Moderate Resolution Imaging
Spectroradiometer aerosol optical depths over land and ocean scenes containing Aerosol Robotic Network
sites. , 110. 190028
Aboal JR; Fernandez JA; Carballeira A. (2004). Oak leaves and pine needles as biomonitors of airborne trace
elements pollution. Environ Exp Bot, 51: 215-225. 155642
ABT. (2001). Assessing Public Opinions on Visibility Impairment Due to Air Pollution: Summary Report.
156185
ABT. (2002). Sense of Place and Stewardship: Final Focus Group Report. 156186
Ackerman A; Kirkpatrick M; Stevens D; Toon O. (2004). The impact of humidity above stratiform clouds on
indirect aerosol climate forcing. Nature, 432: 1014-1017. 190056
Ackerman AS; Toon OB; Stevens DE; Heymsfield AJ; Ramanathan V; Welton EJ. (2000). Reduction of tropical
cloudiness by soot. , 288: 1042-1047. 002987
Ackerman T; Stokes G. (2003). The atmospheric radiation measurement program. , 56: 38"44. 192080
Adachi K; Tainosho Y. (2004). Characterization of heavy metal particles embedded in tire dust. Environ Int, 30:
1009-1017. 081380
Adamo P; Crisafulli P; Giordano S; Minganti V; Modenesi P; Monaci F; Pittao E; Tretiach M; Bargagli R. (2007).
Lichen and moss bags as monitoring devices in urban areas. Part II: Trace element content in living and
dead biomonitors and comparison with synthetic materials. , 146: 392-399. 155644
Albrecht B. (1989). Aerosols, cloud microphysics, and fractional cloudiness. , 245: 1227-1230. 045783
Alexeeva LB; Strachan WMJ; Shlychkova W; Nazarova AA; Nikanorov AM; Korotova LG. (2001).
Organochlorine pesticides and trace metal monitoring of Russian rivers flowing to the Arctic Ocean. Mar
Pollut Bull, 43: 71-85. 155651
Alfani A; De Nicola F; Maisto G; Prati MV. (2005). Long-term PAH accumulation after bud break in Quercus
ilex L leaves in a polluted environment. Atmos Environ, 39: 307-314. 154319
Allen GA; Lawrence J; Koutrakis P. (1999). Field validation of a semi-continuous method for aerosol black
carbon (aethalometer) and temporal patterns of summertime hourly black carbon measurements in
southwestern PA. Atmos Environ, 33: 817-823. 048923
Almas AR; Bakken LR; Mulder J. (2004). Changes in tolerance of soil microbial communities in Zn and Cd
contaminated soils. Soil Biol Biochem, 36: 805-813. 155654
Alpert P; Kishcha P; Kaufman Y; Schwarzbard R. (2005). Global dimming or local dimming?: Effect of
urbanization on sunlight availability. , 32: 17. 190047
Ammann CM; Meehl GA; Washington WM; Zender CS. (2003). A monthly and latitudinally varying volcanic
forcing dataset in simulations of 20th century climate. Geophys Res Lett, 30: 1657. 192057
Anderson HR; Atkinson RW! Bremner SA; Marston L. (2003). Particulate air pollution and hospital admissions
for cardiorespiratory diseases: are the elderly at greater risk?. Eur Respir J, 40: 39s-46s. 054820
Anderson T; Charlson R; Bellouin N; Boucher O; Chin M; Christopher S; Haywood J; Kaufman Y; Kinne S;
Ogren J. (2005). An "A-Train" strategy for quantifying direct climate forcing by anthropogenic aerosols. ,
86: 1795-1809. 189993
Anderson T; Wu Y; Chu D; Schmid B; Redemann J; Dubovik O. (2005). Testing the MODIS satellite retrieval of
aerosol fine-mode fraction. , 110: D18204. 189991
Andreae MO; Gelencser A. (2006). Black carbon or brown carbon? The nature of light-absorbing carbonaceous
aerosols. , 6: 3131-3148. 156215
Andreae MO; Rosenfeld D; Artaxo P; Costa AA; Frank GP; Longo KM; Silva-Dias MAF. (2004). Atmospheric
science: smoking rain clouds over the Amazon. , 303: 1337-1341. 155658
Andronova NG; Rozanov EV; Yang F; Schlesinger ME; Stenchikov GL. (1999). Radiative forcing by volcanic
aerosols from 1850 to 1994. J Geophys Res, 104: 16807—16826. 192286
Antuna JC; Robock A; Stenchikov G; Zhou J; David C; Barnes J; Thomason L. (2003). Spatial and temporal
variability of the stratospheric aerosol cloud produced by the 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruption. J Geophys
Res, 108: 4624. 192251
Note: Hyperlinks to the reference citations throughout this document will take you to the NCEA HERO database (Health and
Environmental Research Online) at http://epa.gov/hero. HERO is a database of scientific literature used by U.S. EPA in the
process of developing science assessments such as the Integrated Science Assessments (ISA) and the Integrated Risk
Information System (IRIS).
July 2009
9-269
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP). (2004). AMAP Assessment 2002- Persistent Organic
Pollutants in the Arctic. AMAP. Oslo, Norway. 190168
Arizona Department of Environmental Quality. (2000). Phoenix metropolitan area visibility briefing paper.
019164
Armbrust DV; Retta A. (2002). Wind and sandblast damage to growing vegetation. , 39: 273-284. 156225
Arnott WP; Moosmuller H; Rogers CF; Jin T> Bruch R. (1999). Photoacoustic spectrometer for measuring light
absorption by aerosol; instrument description. Atmos Environ, 33: 2845-2852. 020650
Audet P; Charest C. (2007). Heavy metal phytoremediation from a meta-analytical perspective. , 147: 231-237.
190169
Augustine J; Hodges G> Dutton Ei Michalsky J; Cornwall C. (2008). An aerosol optical depth climatology for
NOAA's national surface radiation budget network (SURFRAD). , 113: D11204. 189913
Ausset P; Bannery Fi Del Monte M> Lefevre RA. (1998). Recording of pre "industrial atmospheric environment by
ancient crusts on stone monuments. Atmos Environ, 32: 2859-2863. 040480
Avila A; Rodrigo A. (2004). Trace metal fluxes in bulk deposition, throughfall and stemflow at two evergreen
oakstands in NE Spain subject to different exposure to the industrial environment. Atmos Environ, 38:
171-180. 155664
Babich P; Wang PY; Allen G> Sioutas C> Koutrakis P. (2000). Development and Evaluation of a Continuous
Ambient PM2.5 Mass Monitor. Aerosol Sci Technol, 32: 309-324. 156239
Bachelet D; Lenihan J; Neilson R; Drapek R; Kittel T. (2005). Simulating the response of natural ecosystems
and their fire regimes to climatic variability in Alaska. Can J For Res, 35: 2244-2257. 156241
Backe C; Cousins IT; Larsson P. (2004). PCB in soils and estimated soil-air exchange fluxes of selected PCB
congeners in the south of Sweden. Environ Pollut, 128: 59"72. 155668
Bailey R; Barrie LA; Halsall CJ; Fellin PJ Muir DCG. (2000). Atmospheric organochlorine pesticides in the
western Canadian Arctic: evidence of trans-Pacific transport. J Geophys Res, 105: 11805-11811. 155670
Baker M; Charlson R. (1990). Bistability of CCN concentrations and thermodynamics in the cloud-topped
boundary layer. 190016
Balkanski Y; Schulz M; Claquin TJ Guibert S. (2007). Reevaluation of mineral aerosol radiative forcings
suggests a better agreement with satellite and AERONET data. , !'¦ 95. 189979
Baptista MS; Vasconcelos MTSD; Cabral JP; Freitas MC; Pacheco AMG. (2008). Copper, nickel and lead in
lichen and tree bark transplants over different periods of time. Environ Pollut, 151: 408-413. 155673
Baran AJ; Foot JS. (1994). New application of the operational sounder HIRS in determining a climatology of
sulphuric acid aerosol from the Pinatubo eruption. J Geophys Res, 99: 25673-25679. 192032
Barker ML. (1976). Planning for environmental indices: observer appraisals of air quality. In K Craig; E Zube
(Ed.),Perceiving Environmental Quality (pp. 175-203). New York: Plenum Press. 072137
Barnes JE; Hofmann DJ. (1997). Lidar measurements of stratospheric aerosol over Mauna Loa Observatory.
Geophys Res Lett, 24: 1923?1926. 192044
Bates T; Anderson T; Baynard T; Bond T; Boucher O; Carmichael G; Clarke A; Erlick C', Guo H; Horowitz L.
(2006). Aerosol direct radiative effects over the northwest Atlantic, northwest Pacific, and North Indian
Oceans: estimates based on in-situ chemical and optical measurements and chemical transport modeling.
, 6: 175-362. 189912
Bates T; Huebert B; Gras J; Griffiths B; Durkee P. (1998). The International Global Atmospheric Chemistry
(IGAC) Project's First Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE l)"Overview. , 103: 16297-16318.
190063
Bates T; Quinn P; Coffman D; Covert D; Miller T; Johnson J; Carmichael G; Uno I; Guazzotti S; Sodeman D.
(2004). Marine boundary layer dust and pollutant transport associated with the passage of a frontal
system over eastern Asia. , 109. 189958
Bates TS; Quinn PK; Coffman DJ; Johnson JE; Miller TL; Covert DS; Wiedensohler A; Leinert S; Nowak A;
Neususs C. (2001). Regional physical and chemical properties of the marine boundary layer aerosol
across the Atlantic during Aerosols99: an overview. J Geophys Res, 106: 20,767-20,782. 043385
Bauman JJ; Russell PB; Geller MA; Hamill P. (2003). A stratospheric aerosol climatology from SAGE II and
CLAES measurements: 2. Results and comparisons. J Geophys Res, 108: 4383. 192265
BaumgarcLner RE Jr; Isil SS; Bowser JJ; Fitzgerald KM. (1999). Measurements of rural sulfur dioxide and
particle sulfate: analysis of CASTNet data, 1987 through 1996. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 49: 1266-1279.
011308
Baynard T; Lovejoy ER; Pettersson A; Brown SS; Lack D; Osthoff H; Massoli P; Ciciora S; Dube WP;
Ravishankara AR. (2007). Design and application of a pulsed cavity ring-down aerosol extinction
spectrometer for field measurements. Aerosol Sci Technol, 41: 447-462. 151669
July 2009
9-270
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
BBC Research & Consulting. (2002). Phoenix Area Visibility Survey. Draft Report. Available at
http '//www. azdeq.gov/environ/air/download/vis_021903f.pdf. 156258
Becker Ti Brandel M. (2007). Vegetation-environment relationships in a heavy metal-dry grassland complex. ,
42: H-28. 156260
Beeby A; Richmond L. (2002). Evaluating Helix aspersa as a sentinel for mapping metal pollution. , l: 261-270.
155680
Bellouin N> Boucher 0> Haywood J; Reddy MS. (2005). Global emissions of aerosol direct radiative forcing from
satellite measurements. , 438: 1138-1141. 155684
Bellouin N> Boucher 0> Tanre D> Dubovik O. (2003). Aerosol absorption over the clear-sky oceans deduced from
POLDER-1 and AERONET observations. , 30: 1748. 189911
Bellouin N> Jones A; Haywood J; Christopher S. (2008). Updated estimate of aerosol direct radiative forcing
from satellite observations and comparison against the Hadley Centre climate model. , 113. 189999
Beron K> Murdoch J; Thayer M. (2001). The Benefits of Visibility Improvement: New Evidence from the Los
Angeles Metropolitan Area. , 22: 319-337. 156270
Berthelsen BO; Olsen RA; Steinnes E. (1995). Ectomycorrhizal heavy metal accumulation as a contributing
factor to heavy metal levels in organic surface soils. Sci Total Environ, 170: 141-149. 078058
Bhavsar SP; Diamond ML; Evans LJ; Gandhi N; Nilsen J; Antunes P. (2004). Development of a coupled metal
speciation—fate model for surface aquatic systems. Environ Toxicol Chem, 23: 1376— 1385. 155689
Bhavsar SP; Diamond ML; Gandhi N> Nilsen J. (2004). Dynamic coupled metal transport—speciation model:
application to assess a zinc-contaminated lake. Environ Toxicol Chem, 23: 2410—2420. 155690
Bickerstaff K; Walker G. (2001). Public understandings of air pollution: the 'localisation'of environmental risk.
Global Environ Change, 11: 133-145. 156271
Bidleman TF; Jantunen LMM; Helm PA; Bronstrom-Lunden E; Juntto S. (2002). Chlordane isomers and
enantiomers suggest changing sources in Arctic air. Environ Sci Technol, 36: 539-544. 155691
Billings WD. (1978). Plants and the ecosystem. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc. 034165
Bingen C; Fussen D; Vanhellemont F. (2004). A global climatology of stratospheric aerosol size distribution
parameters derived from SAGE II data over the period 1984?2000: 2. Reference data . J Geophys Res,
102: DQ6202. 192262
Blanchard CL; Tanenbaum S. (2006). Weekday/Weekend differences in ambient air pollutant concentrations in
atlanta and the southeastern United States. , 56: 271-284. 192181
Blanchard CL; Tanenbaum S; Hidy GM. (2007). Effects of sulfur dioxide and oxides of nitrogen emission
reductions on fine particulate matter mass concentrations: regional comparisons. J Air Waste Manag
Assoc, 57: 1337-50. 098659
Bluth GJS; Doiron SD; Schnetzler CC; Krueger AJ; Walter LS. (1992). Global tracking of the S02 clouds from
the June, 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruptions . Geophys Res Lett, 19: 151-154. 192029
Bluth GJS; Rose WL Sprod IE. (1997). Stratospheric loading of sulfur from explosive volcanic eruptions. , 105:
671-683. 192045
Bonazza A; Sabbioni C; Ghedini N. (2005). Quantitative data on carbon fractions in interpretation of black
crusts and soiling on European built heritage. Atmos Environ, 39: 2607-2618. 155695
Bond T; Bhardwaj E; Dong R; Jogani R; Jung S; Roden C; Streets D; Trautmann N. (2007). Historical emissions
of black and organic carbon aerosol from energy-related combustion, 1850-2000. Global Biogeochem
Cycles, 21. 190050
Bond TC; Anderson TL; Campbell D. (1999). Calibration and Intercomparison of Filter-Based Measurements of
Visible Light Absorption by Aerosols. Aerosol Sci Technol, 30: 582-600. 156281
Bond TC; Bergstrom RW. (2005). Light absorption by carbonaceous particles: an investigative review. Aerosol
Sci Technol, 39: 1-41. 155696
Bond TC; Streets DG; Yarber KF; Nelson SM; Woo J-H; KLimont Z. (2004). A technology-based global inventory
of black and organic carbon emissions from combustion. J Geophys Res, 109: D14203. 056389
Bond TC; Sun H. (2005). Can reducing black carbon emissions counteract global warming?. Environ Sci Technol,
39: 5921-5926. 156282
Boucher 0; Tanre D. (2000). Estimation of the aerosol perturbation to the Earth's radiative budget over oceans
using POLDER satellite aerosol retrievals. Geophys Res Lett, 27: 1103-1106. 190041
Boucher U; Balabane M; Lamy I; Cambier P. (2005). Decomposition in soil microcosms of leaves of the
metallophyte Arabidopsis halleri: Effect of leaf-associated heavy metals on biodegradation. , 135: 187-
194. 155699
Brasseur G; Granier C. (1992). Mount Pinatubo aerosols, chlorofluorocarbons, and ozone depletion. , 257: 1239"
1242. 192256
July 2009
9-271
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Brenguier J; Chuang Pi Fouquart Yi Johnson Di Parol Fi Pawlowska Hi Pelon J; Schuller Li Schroder Fi Snider
J. (2000). An overview of the ACE-2 CLOUDYCOLUMN closure experiment. , 52: 815-827. 189966
Brimblecombe Pi Grossi CM. (2005). Aesthetic thresholds and blackening of stone buildings. Sci Total Environ,
349: 175-189. 155703
Broccoli AJi Dixon KWi Delworth TLi Knutson TRi Stouffer RJi Zeng F. (2003). Twentieth-century temperature
and precipitation trends in ensemble climate simulations including natural and anthropogenic forcing. J
Geophys Res, 108: 4798. 192283
Brookshire D. (1979). Methods Development for Assessing Air Pollution Control Benefits. Volume 2'
Experiments in Valuing Nonmarket Goods. A Case Study of Alternative Benefit Measures of Air
Pollution in the South Coast Air Basin of Southern California 156298
Burkhardt J; Kaiser Hi Kappen Li Goldbach HE. (2002). The possible role of aerosols on stomatal conductivity
for water vapour. , 2' 351-364. 155708
Burt R; Wilson MA; Mays MD; Lee CW. (2003). Major and trace elements of selected pedons in the USA. J
Environ Qual, 32: 2109-2121. 155709
Backstrom Mi Nilsson Ui Hakansson Ki Allard Bi Karlsson S. (2003). Speciation of heavy metals in road runoff
and roadside total deposition. Water Air Soil Pollut, 147: 343-366. 156242
Campbell Di Copeland Si Cahill T. (1995). Measurement of Aerosol Absorption Coefficient from Teflon Filters
using Integrating Plate and Integrating Sphere Techniques. Aerosol Sci Technol, 22: 287-292. 190171
Campbell FW. (1983). Ambient Stressors. , 15: 355-380. 190172
Camuffo D. (1995). Physical weathering of stones. Presented at In: Saiz-Jimenez, C., ed. The deterioration of
monuments: proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on biodeterioration and biodegradationi
January 1994i Sevilla, Spain. Sci. Total Environ. 167: 1-14. 076278
Canada-US Air Quality Committee, Subcommittee 2' Scientific Cooperation. (2004). Canada-United States
transboundary particulate matter science assessment. Meteorological Service of Canada. Toronto,
Ontario, Canada. En56"203/2004E. http://www.msc-smc.ec.gc.ca/saib/smog/transboundary/toc_e.html.
190519
Carmichael Gi Tang Yi Kurata Gi Uno Ii Streets Di Thongboonchoo Ni Woo Ji Guttikunda Si White Ai Wang T.
(2003). Evaluating regional emission estimates using the TRACE-P observations. , 108: 10.1029. 190042
Carmichael GRi Calori Gi Hay ami Hi Uno Ii Cho SYi Engardt Mi Kim SBi Ichikawa Yi Ikeda Yi Woo JHi Ueda
Hi Amann M. (2002). The MICS-Asia study: model intercomparison of long-range transport and sulfur
deposition in East Asia. Atmos Environ, 36: 175-199. 148319
Carrico Ci Kreidenweis Si Malm Wi Day Di Lee Ti Carrillo Ji McMeeking Gi Collett J. (2005). Hygroscopic
growth behavior of a carbon-dominated aerosol in Yosemite National Park. Atmos Environ, 39: 1393"
1404. 190052
Carvalho LMi Cacjador Ii Martins-Lou
-------
Chen W; Kahn R; Nelson D; Yau Ki Seinfeld J. (2008). Sensitivity of multiangle imaging to the optical and
microphysical properties of biomass burning aerosols. , 113. 189984
Chernyak SM; Rice CP; McConnell LL. (1996). Evidence of currently used pesticides in air, ice, fog, seawater
and surface microlayer in the Bering and Chukchi Seas. Mar Pollut Bull, 32- 410-419. 155726
Chestnut LG; Dennis RL. (1997). Economic benefits of improvements in visibility- acid rain Provisions of the
1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 47: 395-402. 014525
Chin M> Diehl T; Ginoux P; Malm W. (2007). Intercontinental transport of pollution and dust aerosols:
implications for regional air quality. , T- 5501-5517. 190062
Chin M> Ginoux P; Kinne Si Torres Oi Holben Bi Duncan Bi Martin Ri Logan Ji Higurashi Ai Nakajima T.
(2002). Tropospheric aerosol optical thickness from the GOCART model and comparisons with satellite
and Sun photometer measurements. J Trace Elem Med Biol, 59: 461-483. 189996
Chin Mi Kahn RAi Remer LAi Yu Hi Rind Di Feingold Gi Quinn PKi Schwartz SEi Streets DGi DeCola Pi
Halthorne R. (2009). Atmospheric aerosol properties and climate impacts. Synthesis and assesment
product 2.3. A report by the U.S. Climate Change ScienceProgram and the Subcommittee on Global
Change Research. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Washington, DC. 192130
Chiou CTi Sheng Gi Manes M. (2001). A partition-limited model for the plant uptake of organic contaminants
from soil and water. Environ Sci Technol, 35: 1437—1444. 156342
Chipperfield MP; Randel WJi Bodeker GEi Johnston P. (2003). Global ozone: past and future. In Scientific
Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2002 (pp. 4.1?4.90). Geneva: World Meteorological Organization. 192275
Chock DPi Song Q; Hass H; Schell B; Ackermann I. (2003). Comment on "Control of fossil-fuel particulate black
carbon and organic matter, possibly the most effective method of slowing global warming" by Jacobson,
M. Z. J Geophys Res, 108: ACH12.1-ACH13.4. 155727
Chou M; Chan P; Wang M. (2002). Aerosol radiative forcing derived from SeaWiFS-retrieved aerosol optical
properties. J Trace Elem Med Biol, 59: 748-757. 190008
Chow JC; Watson JG; Edgerton SA; Vega E. (2002). Chemical composition of PM10 and PM25 in Mexico City
during winter 1997. Sci Total Environ, 287: 177-201. 036166
Chow JC; Watson JG; Lowenthal DH; Richards LW. (2002). Comparability between PM25 and particle light
scattering measurements. Environ Monit Assess, 79: 29"45. 037784
Christie P; Li XL; Chen BD. (2004). Arbuscular mycorrhiza can depress translocation of zinc to shoots of host
plants in soils moderately polluted with zinc. Plant Soil, 261: 209-217. 190174
Christopher S; Jones T. (2008). Short -wave aerosol radiative efficiency over the global oceans derived from
satellite data. , 60: 636-640. 189985
Christopher SA; Zhang J; Kaufman YJ; Remer L. (2006). Satellite "based assessment of the top of the
atmosphere anthropogenic aerosol radiative forcing over cloud-free oceans. Geophys Res Lett, 111:
L15816.155729
Chu D; Kaufman Y; Ichoku C; Remer L; Tanre D; Holben B. (2002). Validation of MODIS aerosol optical depth
retrieval over land. , 29: 8007. 190001
Chung C; Zhang G. (2004). Impact of absorbing aerosol on precipitation: Dynamic aspects in association with
convective available potential energy and convective parameterization closure and dependence on aerosol
heating profile. , 109. 190054
Chung CE; Ramanathan V; Kim D; Podgorny IA. (2005). Global anthropogenic aerosol direct forcing derived
from satellite and ground-based observations. J Geophys Res, 110: D24207. 155733
Chung SH; Seinfeld JH. (2002). Global distribution and climate forcing of carbonaceous aerosols. J Geophys Res,
107: 4407. 155732
Citterio S; Prato N; Fumagalli P; Aina R; Massa N; Santagostino A; Sgorbati S; Berta G. (2005). The arbuscular
mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae induces growth and metal accumulation changes in Cannabis sativa
L. Chemosphere, 59: 21-29. 190176
Clarke A; Porter J; Valero F; Pilewskie P. (1996). Vertical profiles, aerosol microphysics, and optical closure
during the Atlantic Stratocumulus Transition Experiment: Measured and modeled column optical
properties. , 101: 4443-4453. 190003
Clemens S. (2006). Toxic metal accumulation, responses to exposure and mechanisms of tolerance in plants.
Biochimie, 88: 1707-1719. 190179
Coakley JA; Walsh CD. (2002). Limits to the aerosol indirect radiative effect derived from observations of ship
tracks. J Trace Elem Med Biol, 59: 668-680. 192025
Coelho JP; Rosa M; Pereira E; Duarte A; Pardal MA. (2006). Pattern and annual rates of Scrobicularia plana
mercury bioaccumulation in a human induced mercury gradient (Ria de Aveiro, Portugal). , 69: 629-635.
190181
July 2009
9-273
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Cohen Si Evans GWi Stokols Di Krantz DS. (1986). Behavior, Health, and Environmental Stress. New York-
Plenum Press. 190182
Collins Di Johnsson Hi Seinfeld J; Flagan R; Gasso Si Hegg Di Russell Pi Schmid Bi Livingston J; Ostrom E.
(2000). In situ aerosol -size distributions and clear-column radiative closure during ACE-2. , 52- 498-525.
190059
Collins RNi Merrington G> McLaughlin MJ; Morel JL. (2003). Organic ligand and pH effects on isotopically
exchangeable cadmium in polluted soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 67- 112-121. 155737
Collins W> Rasch P; Eaton B> Khattatov Bi Lamarque J; Zender C. 0- Simulating aerosols using a chemical
transport model with assimilation of satellite aerosol retrievals' Methodology for INDOEX. ,106. 189987
Conant W> VanReken Ti Rissman T> Varutbangkul V; Jonsson H> Nenes A; Jimenez J; Delia A; Bahreini R;
Roberts G. (2004). Aerosol-cloud drop concentration closure in warm cumulus. , 109. 190010
Cooke W; Wilson J. (). A global black carbon aerosol model. , 101. 190046
Cooke WF; Liousse C> Cachier Hi Feichter J. (1999). Construction of a 1 0 x 1 0 fossil fuel emission data set for
carbonaceous aerosol and implementation and radiative impact in the ECHAM 4 model. J Geophys Res,
104: 22137-22162. 156365
Costa Mi Silva Ai Levizzani V. (2004). Aerosol characterization and direct radiative forcing assessment over the
ocean. Part I: Methodology and sensitivity analysis. , 43: 1799-1817. 190006
Costa MJi Levizzani V; Silva AM. (2004). Aerosol characterization and direct radiative forcing assessment over
the ocean. Part IP Application to test cases and validation. , 43: 1818-1833. 192022
Couto JA; Fernandez JA; Aboal JR.; Carballeira A. (2004). Active biomonitoring of element uptake with
terrestrial mosses: a comparison of bulk and dry deposition. Sci Total Environ, 324: 211-222. 155739
Covert DS; Charlson RJ; Ahlquist NC. (1972). A study of the relationship of chemical composition and humidity
to light scattering by aerosols. ,11: 968-976. 072055
Crawford DW; Lipsen MS; Purdie DA; Lohan MC; Statham PJ; Whitney FA; Putland JN; Johnson WK
Sutherland N; Peterson TD; Harrison PJ; Wong CS. (2003). Influence of zinc andiron enrichments on
phytoplankton growth in the northeastern subarctic Pacific. Limnol Oceanogr, 48: 1583-1600. 156370
Creighton PJ; Lioy PJ; Haynie FH; Lemmons TJ; Miller JL; Gerhart J. (1990). Soiling by atmospheric aerosols
in an urban industrial area. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 40: 1285-1289. 044578
Croteau MN! Luoma SN; Stewart AR. (2005). Trophic transfer of metals along freshwater food webs: Evidence
of cadmium biomagnification in nature. Limnol Oceanogr, 50: 1511-1519. 156373
Crepineau C; Rychen G; Feidt C; Le Roux Y; Lichtfouse E; Laurent F. (2003). Contamination of pastures by
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the vicinity of a highway. J Agric Food Chem, 51: 4841-4845.
155741
Cunningham M. (1979). Weather, mood, and helping behavior: Quasi experiments with the sunshine
Samaritan. , 37: 1947-1956. 191974
Cuny D; Denayer FO; De Foucault B; Schumacker R; Colein P; Van Haluwyn C. (2004). Patterns of metal soil
contamination and changes in terrestrial cryptogamic communities. Environ Pollut, 129: 289-297. 155742
Da Silva LC; Oliva MA; Azevedo AA; De Araujo JM. (2006). Responses of restinga plant species to pollution
from an iron pelletization factory. , 175: 241-256. 190190
Dallinger R; Wang Y; Berger B; Mackay EA; Kagi JH. (2001). Spectroscopic characterization of metallothionein
from the terrestrial snail, Helix pomatia. , 268: 4126-4133. 192109
Dameris M; Grewe V; Ponater M; Deckert R; Eyring V; Mager F; Matthes S; Schnadt C; Stenke A; Steil B; Bruhl
C; Giorgetta MA. (2005). Long-term changes and variability in a transient simulation with a chemistry-
climate model employing realistic forcing. , 5- 2121-2145. 192238
Davis AP; Shokouhian M; Ni S. (2001). Loading estimates of lead, copper, cadmium, and zinc in urban runoff
from specific sources. Chemosphere, 44: 997-1009. 024933
Davis MRH; Zhao FJ; McGrath SP. (2004). Pollution-induced community tolerance of soil microbes in response
to a zinc gradient. Environ Toxicol Chem, 23: 2665-2672. 155744
Day R. (2007). Place and the experience of air quality. Health Place, 13: 249-260. 156386
De Gouw J; Middlebrook A; Warneke C; Goldan P; Kuster W', Roberts J; Fehsenfeld F; Worsnop D; Canagaratna
M; Pszenny A. (2005). Budget of organic carbon in a polluted atmosphere: Results from the New England
Air Quality Study in 2002. ,110. 190020
De Nicola F; Maisto G; Prati MV; Alfani A. (2005). Temporal variations in PAH concentrations in Quercus ilex
L. (holm oak) leaves in an urban area. Chemosphere, 61: 432-440. 155747
DeBell L. (2006). Spatial and seasonal patterns and temporal variaibility of haze and its constituents in the
United States: Report IV. ICooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere. Colorado State
University Fort Collins, CO. 156388
July 2009
9-274
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Delworth T> Ramaswamy V; Stenchikov G. (2005). The impact of aerosols on simulated ocean temperature and
heat content in the 20th century. , 32. 190055
Demerjian KL; Mohnen VA. (2008). Synopsis of the temporal variation of particulate matter composition and
size. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 58- 216-233. 156392
Denman KL; Brasseur G> Chidthaisong A; Ciais P; Cox PM; Dickinson RE; Hauglustaine D; Heinze C; Holland
E; Jacob D; Lohmann U; Ramachandran S; da Silva Dias PL; Wofsy SC; Zhang X. (2007). Couplings
Between Changes in the Climate System and Biogeochemistry. • . 156394
Dentener F; Stevenson D; Ellingsen K; Van Noije T; Schultz MJ Amann M; Atherton CJ Bell NJ Bergmann D;
Bey L Bouwman L; Butler T> Cofala J; Collins B; Drevet J; Doherty R; Eickhout B; Eskes H; Fiore A;
Gauss Mi Hauglustaine Di Horowitz Li Isaksen ISA; Josse B; Lawrence M; Krol M; Lamarque JE;
Montanaro V; Muller JF; Peuch VH; Pitari G; Pyle J; Rast S; Rodriguez J; Sanderson M; Savage NH;
Shindell D; Strahan S; et al. (2006). The global atmospheric environment for the next generation.
Environ Sci Technol, 40: 3586-3594. 088434
Derome J; Lindroos A"J. (1998). Effects of heavy metal contamination on macronutrient availability and
acidification parameters in forest soil in the vicinity of the Harjavalta Cu-Ni smelter, SW Finland.
Environ Pollut, 99: 225-232. 155749
Deshler T; Hervig ME; Hofmann DJ; Rosen JM; Liley JB. (2003). Thirty years of in situ stratospheric aerosol
size distribution measurements from Laramie, Wyoming (41°N), using balloon-borne instruments . J
Geophys Res, 108: 4167. 192058
Deuze J; Breon F; Devaux C; Goloub P; Herman M; Lafrance B; Maignan F; Marchand A; Nadal F; Perry G.
(2001). Remote sensing of aerosols over land surfaces from POLDER-ADEOS-1 polarized measurements.
, 106: x. 192013
Di Toro DM; McGrath JH; Berry WJ; Paquin PR; Mathew R; Wu KB; Santore RC. (2005). Predicting sediment
metal toxicity using a sediment biotic ligand model: Methodology and initial application. Environ Toxicol
Chem, 24: 2410-2427. 155750
Diner D; Beckert J; Bothwell G; Rodriguez J. (2002). Performance of the MISR instrument during its first 20
months in Earth orbit. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 40: 1449-1466. 189967
Diner D; Beckert J; Reilly T; Bruegge C; Conel J; Kahn R; Martonchik J; Ackerman T; Davies R; Gerstl S.
(1998). Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer(MISR) instrument description and experiment overview.
IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 36: 1072-1087. 189962
Doherty S; Quinn P; Jefferson A; Carrico C; Anderson T; Hegg D. (2005). A comparison and summary of aerosol
optical properties as observed in situ from aircraft, ship, and land during ACE-Asia. , 110. 190027
Donahue WF; Allen EW! Schindler DW. (2006). Impacts of coal-fired power plants on trace metals and polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in lake sediments in central Alberta, Canada. J Paleolimnol, 35: 111-128.
155751
Dong Y; Zhu YG; Smith FA; Wang Y; Chen B. (2008). Arbuscular mycorrhiza enhanced arsenic resistance of
both white clover (Trifolium repens Linn.) and ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) plants in an arsenic-
contaminated soil. Environ Pollut, 155: 174-181. 192106
Douglass AR; Schoeberl MR; Rood RB; Pawson S. (2003). Evaluation of transport in the lower tropical
stratosphere in a global chemistry and transport model. J Geophys Res, 108D9. 057260
Dubovik O; Holben B; Eck TF; Smirnov A; Kaufman YJ; King MD; Tanre D;Slutsker I. (2002). Variability of
absorption and optical properties of key aerosol types observed in worldwide locations . J Trace Elem
Med Biol, 59: 590-608. 190202
Dubovik O; King MD. (2000). A flexible inversion algorithm for retrieval of aerosol optical properties from sun
and sky radiance measurements. J Geophys Res, 105: 20673-20696. 190197
Dubovik O; Lapyonok T; Kaufman Y; Chin M; Ginoux P; Sinyuk A. (2007). Retrieving global sources of aerosols
from MODIS observations by inverting GOCART model. , 7: 3629-3718. 190211
Dubovik O; Smirnov A; Holben BN; King MDiKaufman YJ; Eck TF; Slutsker I. (2000). Accuracy assessments of
aerosol optical properties retrieved from AERONET sun and sky radiance measurements. J Geophys Res,
105: 9791-9806. 190177
Duriscoe DM; Luginbuhl CB; Moore CA. (2007). Measuring Night-Sky Brightness with a Wide-Field CCD
Camera. , 119: 192-213. 156411
Dusek R; Frank GP; Hildebrandt L; Curtius J; Schneider J; Walter S; Chand D; Drewnick F; Hings S; Jung D;
Borrmann S; Andreae MO. (2006). Size matters more than chemistry for cloud-nucleating ability of
aerosol particles. 1375-1378. 155756
Eagan RC; Hobbs PV; Radke LF. (1974). Measurements of cloud condensation nuclei and cloud droplet size
distributions in the vicinity of forest fires. , 13: 553-557. 190231
July 2009
9-275
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Eck TF; Holben BN; Reid JS; Dubovik O; Smirnov A; O'Neill NT; Slutsker I; Kinne S. (1999). Wavelength
dependence of the optical depth of biomass burning, urban, and desert dust aerosols . J Geophys Res,
104: 31333-31350. 190390
Eck TF; Holben BN; Reid JS; Sinyuk A; Dubovik O; Smirnov A; Giles D; O'Neill NT; Tsay SC; Ji Q; Mandoos
AAI; Khan MR; Reid EA; Schafer JS; Sorokine M; Newcomb W', Slutsker I. (2008). Spatial and temporal
variability of column- integrated aerosol optical properties in the southern Arabian Gulf and United Arab
Emirates in summer. J Geophys Res, 113: in press. 190409
Edgerton ES; Hartsell BE; Jansen JJ; Hansen DA; Waid CJ; Kandasamy K. (2004). 5-Year Trend Analysis of
PM2.5 Data from the SEARCH Network. Presented at , . 156413
Eeva T; Lehikoinen E. (2004). Rich calcium availability diminishes heavy metal toxicity in Pied Flycatcher.
Funct Ecol, 18: 548-553. 155762
Eeva T; Tanhuanpaa S; Rabergh C; Airaksinen S; Nikinmaa M; Lehikoinen E. (2000). Biomarkers and
fluctuating asymmetry as indicators of pollution- induced stress in two hole-nesting passerines. Funct
Ecol, 14: 235-243. 155761
Elliot SJ; Cole DC; Krueger P; Voorberg N; Wakefield S. (1999). The power of perception: health risk attributed
to air pollution in an urban industrial neighborhood. Risk Anal, 19: 621-634. 010716
Ely DW; Leary JT; Stewart TR; Ross DM. (1991). The Establishment of the Denver Visibility Standard.
Presented at . 156417
Englert N. (2004). Fine particles and human health - a review of epidemiological studies. Toxicol Lett, 149: 235"
242. 087939
EPA. (2000). National air pollutant emission trends, 1900-1998. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Washington, D.C.. . . 012211
EPA. (2001). Draft Guidance for tracking progress under the regional haze rule. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency. Washington, D.C.. . . 157068
Ericksen JA; Gustin MS; Schorran DE; Johnson DW; Lindberg SE; Coleman JS. (2003). Accumulation of
atmospheric mercury in forest foliage. Atmos Environ, 37: 1613-1622. 155769
Ervens B; Feingold G; and SMKreidenweis SM. (2005). The influence of water-soluble organic carbon on cloud
drop number concentration. J Geophys Res, 110: D18211.l-D18211.14. 190527
Evans GW; Jacobs SV. (1982). Air Pollution and Human Behavior. In Evans, GW (Ed.),Environmental Stress
(pp. 105-132). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 179899
Evans GW; Jacobs SV; Dooley D; Catalano R. (1987). The Interaction of Stressful Life Events and Chronic
Strains on Community Mental Health. , 15: 23"24. 190347
Evans GW; Jacobs SV; Frager NB. (1982). Behavioral responses to air pollution. In A Baum! J Singer
(Ed.),Advances in Environmental Psychology (pp. 237-269). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 190521
Ewald G; Larsson P; Linge H; Okla L; Szarzi M. (1998). Biotransport of organic pollutants to an inland Alaska
lake by migrating sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). , 51: 40-47. 190348
FehsenfeldFC | Ancellet G | Bates TS | Goldstein AH | Hardesty RM | Honrath R | Law KS; Lewis AC;
Leaitch R; McKeen S; Meagher J; Parrish DD; Pszenny AAP; Russell PB; Schlager H; Seinfeld J; Talbot
R; Zbinden R. (2006). International consortium for atmospheric research on transport and transformation
(ICARTT): North America to Europe -overview of the 2004 summer field study . J Geophys Res, 111:
D23S01.1-D23S01.36. 190531
Feichter J; Sausen R; GraBl H; Fiebig M. (2003). Comment on "Control of fossil-fuel particulate black carbon
and organic matter, possibly the most effective method of slowing global warming" by M. Z. Jacobson. J
Geophys Res, 108 (D24), 4767, doi:i0.1029/2002JD003223. 155772
Feingold G. (2003). Modeling of the first indirect effect: Analysis of measurement requirements. Geophys Res
Lett, 30: ASC7.1-ASC7.4. 190547
Feingold G; Furrer R; Pilewskie P; Remer LA; Min Q; Jonsson; Haflidi. (2003). Aerosol indirect effect studies at
southern great plains during the May 2003 intensive operations period . J Geophys Res, 111: D5. 190551
Feingold G; Jiang H; Harrington J. (2005). On smoke suppression of clouds in Amazonia. Geophys Res Lett, 32:
L02804.1-L02804.4. 190550
Feingold G; Remer LA; Ramaprasad J; Kaufman YJ. (2001). Analysis of smoke impact on clouds in Brazilian
biomass burning regions: An extension of Twomey's approach. J Geophys Res, 106: 22907-22922. 190544
Feingold G; Stevens B; Cotton WR; Walko RL. (1994). An explicit microphysics/LES model designed to simulate
the Twomey Effect. , 33: 207-233. 190535
Feingold GW; Cotton WR; Kreidenweis SM; Davis JT. (1999). The impact of giant cloud condensation nuclei on
drizzle formation in stratocumulus: Implications for cloud radiative properties. J Trace Elem Med Biol,
56: 4100-4117. 190540
July 2009
9-276
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Feng MH; Shan XQ; Zhang SZ; Wen B. (2005). Comparison of a rhizosphere-based method with other one-step
extraction methods for assessing the bioavailability of soil metals to wheat. Chemosphere, 59- 939-949.
155774
Ferm Mi Watt Ji O'Hanlon Si De Santis F- Varotsos C. (2006). Deposition measurement of particulate matter in
connection with corrosion studies. Anal Bioanal Chem, 384- 1320-30. 155135
Fernandes SDi Trautmann NMi Streets DGi Roden CAi Bond TC. (2007). Global biofuel use, 1850-2000. Global
Biogeochem Cycles, 21: GB2019.1-GB2019.15. 190554
Ferrare Ri Feingold Gi Ghan Si Ogren J Schmid Bi Schwartz SEi Sheridan P. (2006). Preface to special section:
Atmospheric radiation measurement program May 2003 intensive operations period examining aerosol
properties and radiative influences . J Geophys Res, 111: D05S01. 190561
Fiore AMi Jacob DJi Mathur Ri Martin RV. (2003). Application of empirical orthogonal functions to evaluate
ozone simulations with regional and global models. J Geophys Res, 108D14: . 047805
Fishman Ji Hoell JMi Bendura RDi McNeal RJi Kirchhoff V. (1996). NASA GTE TRACE A experiment
(September- October 2002): Overview. J Geophys Res, 101: 23865-23880. 190566
Fismes Ji Perrin-Ganier Ci Empereur-Bissonnet Pi Morel JL. (2002). Soil-to-root transfer and translocation of
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by vegetables grown on industrial contaminated soils. , 31: 1649-1656.
141156
Fitzgerald JW. (1975). Approximation formulas for the equilibrium size of an aerosol particle as a function of its
dry size and composition and the ambient relative humidity. , 14: 1044-1049. 095417
Forster Pi Ramaswamy Vi Artaxo Pi Betss Ri Fahey DWi Haywood Ji Lean Ji Lowe DCi Myhre Gi Nganga Ji
Prinn Ri Raga Gi Schultz Mi Van Dorland R. (2007). Changes in atmospheric constituents and in
radiative forcing. In Solomon, S.i Qin, D.i Manning, M.i Chen, Z.i Marquis, M.i Averyt, K. B.i Tignor, M.i
Miller, H. L. (Ed.),Climate Change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to
the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on: . 092936
Fraser Ri Kaufman Y. (1985). The relative importance of aerosol scattering and absorption in remote sensing.
IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, GE-23: 625-633. 190567
Free Mi Angell JK. (2002). Effect of volcanoes on the vertical temperature profile in radiosonde data. J Geophys
Res, 107: 4101. 192281
Freer-Smith PHi El-khatib Ai Taylor G. (2004). Capture of particulate pollution by trees: a comparison of
species typical of semi-arid areas (Ficus nitida and Eucalyptus globulus) with European and North
American species. Water Air Soil Pollut, 155: 173-187. 156451
Frescholtz TFi Gustin MSi Schorran DEi Fernandez GCJ. (2003). Assessing the source of mercury in the foliar
tissue of quaking aspen. Environ Toxicol Chem, 22: 2114-2119. 190352
Fritze Hi Niini Si Mikkola Ki Makinen A. (1989). Soil microbial effects of a Cu-Ni smelter in southwestern
Finland. , 8: 87-94. 079635
Fryer MEi Collins CD. (2003). Model intercomparison for the uptake of organic chemicals by plants. Environ Sci
Technol, 37: 1617-1624. 156454
Gandhi Ni Bhavsar SPi Diamond MLi Kuwabara JSi Marvin-DiPasquale Mi Krabbenhoft DP. (2007).
Development of a mercury speciation, fate, andbiotic uptake (BIOTRANSPEC) model: Application to
Lahontan Reservoir (Nevada, USA). Environ Toxicol Chem, 26: 2260-2273. 155781
Gao YZi Zhu LZ. (2004). Plant uptake, accumulation and translocation of phenanthrene andpyrene in soils.
Chemosphere, 55: 1169-1178. 155782
Garrett Ti Zhao Ci Dong X; Mace Gi Hobbs P. (2004). Effects of varying aerosol regimes on low-level Arctic
stratus. Geophys Res Lett, 31: L17105.1-L17105.4. 190568
Garrett TJi Zhao C. (2006). Increased Arctic cloud longwave emissivity associated with pollution from mid-
latitudes. Nature, 440: 787-789. 190570
Gawel JEi Ahner BA; Friedland AJ; Morel FMM. (1996). Role for heavy metals in forest decline indicated by
phytochelatin measurements. , 381: 64"65. 012278
Generoso S; Bey I; Attie J-L; Breon F"M. (2007). A satellite- and model-based assessment of the 2003 Russian
fires: impact on the arctic region. J Geophys Res, 112: 5302. 155786
Geogdzhayev L Mishchenko M; Rossow W; Cairns B; Lacis AA. (2002). Global two-channel AVHRR retrievals of
aerosol properties over the ocean for the period of NOAA-9 observations and preliminary retrievals using
NOAA-7 and NOAA-11 data. J Trace Elem Med Biol, 59: 262-278. 190574
Geron C; Rasmussen R; Arnts RR; Guenther A. (2000). A review and synthesis of monoterpene speciation from
forests in the United States. Atmos Environ, 34: 1761-1781. 019095
Gillett NP; Hegerl GC; Allen MR; Stott PA; Schnur R. (2002). Reconciling two approaches to the detection of
anthropogenic influence on climate. J Clim, 15: 326-329. 190576
July 2009
9-277
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Gillett NP; Zwiers FW; Weaver AJ; Hegerl GC; Allen MR; Stott PA. (2002). Detecting anthropogenic influence
with a multi-model ensemble. J Geophys Res, 29- 31.1-31.4. 190578
Gilliland FD; Li YF; Saxon A; Diaz-Sanchez D. (2004). Effect of glutathione-S-transferase Ml and PI genotypes
on xenobiotic enhancement of allergic responses' randomised, placebo-controlled crossover study. Lancet,
363: 119-125. 156471
Ginoux P; Chin M> Holben B; Lin SJ; Tegen L Prospero JM; Dubovik O. (2001). Sources and distributions of
dust aerosols simulated with the GOCART model. J Geophys Res, 20: 20255-20273. 190579
Ginoux P; Horowitz LW; Ramaswamy V; Geogdzhayev IV; Holben BN; Stenchikov GJ Tie X. (2006). Evaluation
of aerosol distribution and optical depth in the geophysical fluid dynamics laboratory coupled model
CM2.1 for present climate. J Geophys Res, 111: D22210. 190582
Gitay Hi Brown Si Easterling Wi Jallow B. (2001). Ecosystems and their goods and services. In Climate change
2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the third assessment
report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 237-342). Cambridge, United Kingdom:
Cambridge University Press. 092761
Givati Ai Rosenfeld D. (2004). Quantifying precipitation suppression due to air pollution. , 43: 1038-1056.
156475
Gleason SMi Faucette DTi Toyofuku MM; Torres CA; Bagley CF. (2007). Assessing and mitigating the effects of
windblown soil on rare and common vegetation. Environ Manage, 40: 1016-1024. 155794
Goforth MR; Christoforou CS. (2006). Particle size distribution and atmospheric metals measurements in a
rural area in the South Eastern USA. Sci Total Environ, 356: 217-227. 088353
Gohre V; Paszkowski U. (2006). Contribution of the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis to heavy metal
phytoremediation. Planta, 223: 1115-1122. 190355
Golaz JC; Larson VE; Cotton WR. (2002). A PDF based model for boundary layer clouds. Part I: Method and
model description. J Trace Elem Med Biol, 59: 3540-3551. 190587
Golaz JC; Larson VE; Cotton WR. (2002). A PDF-Based Model for Boundary Layer Clouds. Part II: Model
Results. J Trace Elem Med Biol, 59: 3552-3571. 190589
Gomot-de Vaufleury A; Kerhoas I. (2000). Effects of cadmium on the reproductive system of the land snail Helix
aspersa. , 64: 434-442. 155798
Gomot-De Vaufleury A; Pihan F. (2002). Methods for toxicity assessment of contaminated soil by oral or dermal
uptake in land snails: Metal bioavailability and bioaccumulation. Environ Toxicol Chem, 21: 820-827.
190357
Gonzalez-Chavez C; Harris PJ; Dodd J; Meharg AA. (2002). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi confer enhanced
arsenate resistance on Holcus lanatus. New Phytol, 155: 163-171. 155800
Goodarzi F; Sanei H; Garrett RG; Duncan WF. (2002). Accumulation of trace elements on the surface soil
around the Trail smelter, British Columbia, Canada. , 43: 29"38. 155801
Gordon W; Jackson R. (2000). Nutrient concentrations in fine roots. Ecology, 81: 275-280. 155802
Goudie AS; Elaine W; Viles HA. (2002). The roles of salt and fog in weathering: a laboratory simulation of
conditions the northern Atacama Desert, Chile. Catena, 48: 255—266. 156486
Grabowski WW. (2004). An improved framework for superparameterization. [embedding of cloud-resolving
model in each column of large-scale model for small-scale and mesoscale processes representation] . J
Trace Elem Med Biol, 61: 1940-1952. 190590
Grabowski WW; Wu X; Moncrieff MW. (1999). Cloud resolving modeling of tropical cloud systems during phase
III of GATE. Part III: Effects of cloud microphysics . J Trace Elem Med Biol, 56: 2384-2402. 190592
Grannas AM; Hockaday WC; Hatcher PG; Thompson LG; Mosley-Thompson E. (2006). New revelations on the
nature of organic matter in ice cores. J Geophys Res, 111, D04304, doi:i0.1029/2005JD006251. 155804
Grannas AM; Jones AE; Dibb J; Ammann M; Anastasio C; Beine HJ; Bergin M; Bottenheim J; Boxe CS; Carver
G; Chen G; Crawford JH; Domine F; Frey MM; Guzman MI; Heard DE; Helmig D; Hoffmann MR;
Honrath RE; Huey LG; Hutterli M; Jacobi HW; Klan P; Lefer B; McCo. (2007). An overview of snow
photochemistry: evidence, mechanisms and impacts. , T- 4329-4373. 156492
Grannas AM; Shepson PB; Filley TR. (2004). Photochemistry and nature of organic matter in Arctic and
Antarctic snow. Global Biogeochem Cycles, 18(l), GB1006, doi:i0.1029/2003GB002133. 155803
Grantz DA; Garner JHB; Johnson DW. (2003). Ecological effects of particulate matter. Environ Int, 29: 213-239.
155805
Gratao PL; Polle A; Lea PJ; Azevedo RA. (2005). Making the life of heavy metal-stressed plants a little easier.
Funct Plant Biol, 32: 481-494. 190364
Gray JS. (2002). Biomagnification in marine systems: The perspective of an ecologist. Mar Pollut Bull, 45: 46"52.
155806
July 2009
9-278
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Greenstein D; Tiefenthaler L; Bay S. (2004). Toxicity of parking lot runoff after application of simulated rainfall.
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol, 47: 199-206. 155808
Gregory JM; Stouffer RJ; Raper SCB; Stott PA; Rayner NA. (2002). An observationally based estimate of the
climate sensitivity. J Clim, 15: 3117-3121. 190593
Griffith DA; Solak ME; Yorty DP. (2005). Is air pollution impacting winter orographic precipitation in Utah?
Weather modification association. J Weather Modif, 37: 14-20. 156497
Grigal DF. (2002). Inputs and outputs of mercury from terrestrial watersheds: a review. , 10: 1—39. 156498
Grigal DF. (2003). Mercury sequestration in forests and peatlands: A review. J Environ Qual, 32: 393-405.
155811
Grossi CM; Brimblecombe P. (2004). Aesthetics of simulated soiling patterns on architecture. Environ Sci
Technol, 38: 3971-3976. 155813
Grossi CM; Esbert RM; Diaz-Pache F; Alonso FJ. (2003). Soiling of building stones in urban environments. , 38:
147-159. 155812
Guderian R ed. (1985). Air pollution by photochemical oxidants: formation, transport, control, and effects on
plants. New York: Springer-Verlag. 019325
Guderian R. (1977). Accumulation of pollutants in plant organs. In Air pollution: phytotoxicity of acidic gases
and its significance in air pollution controlBerlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. 004150
Gunn R; Phillips BB. (1957). An experimental investigation of the effect of air pollution on the initiation of rain.
J Trace Elem Med Biol, 14: 272-280. 190595
Gupta P; Christopher SA; Wang J; Gehrig R; Lee Y; Kumar N. (2006). Satellite remote sensing of particulate
matter and air quality assessment over global cities. Atmos Environ, 40: 5880-5892. 137694
Gustin MS. (2003). Are mercury emissions from geologic sources significant? A status report. Sci Total Environ,
304: 153-167. 155816
Hageman KJ; Simonich SL; Campbell DH; Wilson GR; Landers DH. (2006). Atmospheric deposition of current-
use and historic-use pesticides in snow at national parks in the western United States. Environ Sci
Technol, 40: 3174-3180. 156509
Hall JL. (2002). Cellular mechanisms for heavy metal detoxification and tolerance. J Exp Bot, 53: 1-11. 190365
Halsall CJ. (2004). Investigating the occurrence of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in the Arctic: their
atmospheric behaviour and interaction with the seasonal snow pack. Environ Pollut, 128: 163-175.
155822
Halsall CJ; Barrie LA; Fellin P; Muir DCG; Rovinski FY; Kononov EY. (1997). Spatial and temporal variation of
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the arctic atmosphere. Environ Sci Technol, 31: 3593-3599. 155821
Han Q; Rossow WB; Chou J; Welch RM. (1998). Global survey of the relationship of cloud albedo and liquid
water path with droplet size using ISCCP. J Clim, 11: 1516-1528. 190594
Han Q; Rossow WB; Zeng J. (2002). Three different behaviors on liquid water path of clouds in aerosol-cloud
interactions. J Trace Elem Med Biol, 59: 726-735. 049181
Hand JL; Kreidenweis SM; Sherman DE; Collett JL Jr; Hering SV; Day DE; Malm WC. (2002). Aerosol size
distributions and visibility estimates during the big bend regional aerosol visibility and observational
study (BRAVO). Atmos Environ, 36: 5043-5055. 190367
Hand JL; Malm WC. (2006). Review of the IMPROVE Equation for Estimating Ambient Light Extinction
Coefficients-Final Report 156517
Hand JL; Malm WC. (2007). Review of aerosol mass scattering efficiencies from ground-based measurements
since 1990. J Geophys Res, 112: . 155825
Hansen AC; Zhang Q; Lyne PWL. (2005). Ethanol-diesel fuel blends--a review. Bioresour Technol, 96: 277-285.
059087
Hansen AD; Rosen AH; Novakov T. (1982). Real-Time Measurement of the Absorption Coefficient of Aerosol
Particles. Appl Opt, 21: 3060-3062. 190368
Hansen ADA; Rosen H; Novakov T. (1984). The aethalometer - an instrument for the real-time measurement of
optical absorption by aerosol particles. Sci Total Environ, 36: 191-196. 002396
Hansen J; Nazarenko L. (2004). Soot climate forcing via snow and ice albedos. Presented at , . 156521
Hansen J; Sato M; Mazarenko L; Ruedy R; Lacis A; Koch D; Tegen I; Hall T; Shindell D; Santer B; Stone P;
Novakov T; Thomason L; Wang R; Wang Y; Jacob D; Hollandsworth S; Bishop L; Logan J; Thompson A;
Stolarski R; Lean J; Willson R; Levitus S; Antonov J; Rayner N; Parker D; Christy J. (2002). Climate
forcings in Goddard Institute for Space Studies S12000 simulations. J Geophys Res, 107. 049177
July 2009
9-279
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Hansen J; Sato M> Ruedy R; Kharecha P; Lacis A; Miller R; Nazarenko L; Lo K> Schmidt GA; Russell G> Aleinov
L Bauer S> Baum Ei Cairns Bi Canuto V; Chandler M> Cheng Y> Cohen A; Del Genio A; Faluvegi G>
Fleming E; Friend A; Hall T; Jackman C; Jonas J; Kelley M; Kiang NY; Koch D; Labow G; Lerner J;
Menon S> Novakov T> Oinas V; Perlwitz JA; Perlwitz Jui Rind Di Romanou A; Schmunk R; Shindell D>
Stone P; Sun Si Streets Di Tausnev Ni Thresher Di Unger Ni Yao Mi Zhang S. (2007). Climate
simulations for 1880-2003 with GISS modelE. , 29- 661-696. 190597
Hansen Ji Sato Mi Ruedy Ri Lacis Ai Oinas V. (2000). Global warming in the twenty-first century- an
alternative scenario. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 97: 9875-9880. 042683
Hansen Ji Sato Mi Ruedy Ri Nazarenko Li Lacis Ai Schmidt GAi Russell Gi Aleinov Ii Bauer Mi Bauer Si Bell Ni
Cairns Bi Canuto Vi Chandler Mi Cheng Yi Del Genio Ai Faluvegi Gi Fleming Ei Friend Ai Hall Ti
Jackman Ci Kelley Mi Kiang Ni Koch Di Lean Ji Lerner Ji Lo Ki Menon Si Miller Ri Minnis Pi Novakov
Ti Oinas Vi Perlwitz JA; Perlwitz Jui Rind D; Romanou A; Shindell D; Stone P; Sun Si Tausnev Ni
Thresher Di Wielicki Bi Wong Ti Yao Mi Zhang S. (2005). Efficacy of climate forcings. J Geophys Res,
110: D18104.190596
Hansen JEi Sato Mi Ruedy R. (1997). Radiative forcing and climate response. J Geophys Res, 102: 6831-6864.
043104
Hargrave BTi Barrie LAi Bidleman TFi Welch HE. (1997). Seasonality in exchange of organochlorines between
arctic air and seawater. Environ Sci Technol, 31: 3258-3266. 155827
Harmens Hi Norris DAi Koerber GRi Buse Ai Steinnes Ei Riihling A. (2007). Temporal trends in the
concentration of arsenic, chromium, copper, iron, nickel, vanadium and zinc in mosses across Europe
between 1990 and 2000. Atmos Environ, 41: 6673-6687. 155828
Harner Ti Jantunen LMMi Bidleman TFi Barrie LAi Kylin Hi Strachan WMJi Macdonald RW. (2000). Microbial
degradation is a key elimination pathway of hexachlorocyclohexanes from the Arctic Ocean. Geophys Res
Lett, 27: 1155-1158. 155829
Harrison Li Michalsky Ji Berndt J. (1994). Automated multifilter rotating shadow-band radiometer: an
instrument for optical depth and radiation measurements. Appl Opt, 33: 5118-5125. 045805
Harvey LDD. (2004). Characterizing the annual-mean climatic effect of anthropogenic C02 and aerosol
emissions in eight coupled atmosphere-ocean GCMs. , 23: 569-599. 190598
Hassan Ri Scholes Ri Ash N. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends, volume 1.
092759
Hauck M. (2003). Epiphytic lichen diversity and forest dieback: The role of chemical site factors. Bryologist, 106:
257-269. 155830
Haynie FH. (1986). Environmental factors affecting corrosion of weathering steel. Presented at Materials
degradation caused by acid rain: developed from the 20th state-of-the-art symposium of the American
Chemical Society; June 1985; Arlington, VA., Washington, DC. 157198
Haynie FH; Lemmons TJ. (1990). Particulate matter soiling of exterior paints at a rural site. Aerosol Sci
Technol, 13: 356-367. 044579
Haywood J; Boucher O. (2000). Estimates of the direct and indirect radiative forcing due to tropospheric
aerosols: A review. Rev Geophys, 38: 513-543. 156531
Haywood J; Francis P; Osborne S; Glew M; Loeb N; Highwood E; Tanre D; Myhre G; Formenti P; Hirst E.
(2003). Radiative properties and direct radiative effect of Saharan dust measured by the C-130 aircraft
during SHADE: 1. Solar spectrum : The Saharan Dust Experiment (SHADE). , 108: SAH 4-1. 190599
Haywood J; Schulz M. (2007). Causes of the reduction in uncertainty in the anthropogenic radiative forcing of
climate between IPCC (2001) and IPCC (2007). Geophys Res Lett, 34: L20701. 190600
Haywood JM; Pelon J; Formenti P; Bharmal N; Brooks M; Capes G; Chazette P; Chou C; Christopher S; Coe H;
Cuesta J; Derimian Y; Desboeufs K; Greed G; Harrison M; Heese B; Highwood EJ; Johnson B; Mallet M;
Marticorena B; Marsham J; Milton S; Myhre G; Osborne SR; Parker DJ; Rajot JL; Schulz M; Slingo A;
Tanre D; Tulet P. (2008). Overview of the dust and biomass burning experiment and African monsoon
multidisciplinary analysis special observing Period"0. J Geophys Res, 113: D00C17. 190602
Haywood JM; Ramaswamy V; Soden BJ. (1999). Tropospheric aerosol climate forcing in clear-sky satellite
observations over the oceans. , 283: 1299-1303. 040453
Heald CL; Jacob DJ; Park RJ; Russell LM; Huebert BJ; Seinfeld JH; Liao H; Weber RJ. (2005). A large organic
aerosol source in the free troposphere missing from current models. Geophys Res Lett, 32: L18809.1"
L18809.4. 190603
HEL Ackerman A; Toon O; Hobbs P. (1994). Reassessing the dependence of cloud condensation nucleus
concentration on formation rate. Nature. 189975
Heintzenberg J. (2008). The SAMUM-1 experiment over Southern Morocco: overview and introduction. , 61: 2-
11. 190605
July 2009
9-280
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Helena P; Franc B; Cvetka RL. (2004). Monitoring of short-term heavy metal deposition by accumulation in
epiphytic lichens (Hypogymnia Physodes (L.) Nyl.). , 49' 223-230. 155833
Helm PA; Diamond ML; Semkin R; Bidleman TF. (2000). Degradation as a loss mechanism in the fate of a-
hexachlorocyclohexane in Arctic watersheds. Environ Sci Technol, 34- 812-818. 155834
Helm PA; Diamond ML; Semkin R; Strachan WMJ; Teixeira C', Gregor D. (2002). A mass balance model
describing multi-year fate of organochlorine compounds in a high arctic lake. Environ Sci Technol, 36-
996-1003. 155835
Helmisaari H"S; Makkonen K; Olsson M; Viksna A; Malkonen E. (1999). Fine-root growth, mortality and heavy
metal concentrations in limed and fertilized Pinus silvestris (L.) stands in the vicinity of a Cu_Ni smelter
in SW Finland. Plant Soil, 209- 193-200. 155836
Henze DK; Seinfeld JH. (2006). Global secondary organic aerosol from isoprene oxidation. Geophys Res Lett, 33-
L09812.1-L09812.4. 190606
Herman JR; Bhartia PK; Torres O; Hsu C; Seftor C; Celarier E. (1997). Global distribution of UV-absorbing
aerosols from Nimbus 7/TOMS data. J Geophys Res, 102- 16911-16922. 048393
Hernandez L; Probst A; Probst JL; Ulrich E. (2003). Heavy metal distribution in some French forest soils-
Evidence for atmospheric contamination. Sci Total Environ, 312- 195-219. 155841
Herner JD; Ying Q; Aw J; Gao O; Chang DPY; Kleeman MJ. (2006). Dominant Mechanisms that Shape the
Airborne Particle Size and Composition Distribution in Central California. Aerosol Sci Technol, 40- 827"
844. 135981
Herrera LK; Videla HA. (2004). The importance of atmospheric effects on biodeterioration of cultural heritage
constructional materials. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation, 54- 125-134. 155843
Hicke JA; Asner GP; Kasischike ES; French NHF; Randerson JT; Collatz GJ; Stocks BJ; Tucker CJ; Los SO;
Field CB. (2003). Postfire response of North American boreal forest net primary productivity analysed
with satellite observations. , 9: 1145-1157. 156545
Hinzman LD; Fukuda M; Sandberg DV; Chapin III FS; Dash D. (2003). FROSTFIRE: an experimental approach
to predicting the climate feedbacks from the changing boreal fire regime. J Geophys Res, 108 (Dl), 8153,
doi:i0.1029/2001JD000415: . 155845
Hobbelen PHF; Koolhaas JE; van Gestel CAM. (2006). Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in the earthworms
Lumbricus rubellus and Aporrectodea caliginosa in relation to total and available metal concentrations
in field soils. , 144: 639-646. 190371
Hodzic A; Madronich S; Bohn B; Massie S; Menut L; Wiedinmyer C. (2007). Wildfire particulate matter in
Europe during summer 2003: meso-scale modeling of smoke emissions, transport and radiative effects. ,
7: 4043-4064. 156553
Hoell JM; Davis DD; Liu SC; Newell R; Shipham M; Akimoto H; McNeal RJ; Bemdura RJ; Drewry JW. (1996).
Pacific exploratory mission-west A (PEM-WEST A): September- October, 1991. J Geophys Res, 101: 1641"
1653. 190607
Hoell JM; Davis DD; Liu SC; Newell RE; Akimoto H; McNeal RJ; Bendura RJ. (1997). The Pacific exploratory
mission-west phase B: February-March, 1994. J Geophys Res, 102: 28223-28239. 057373
Hoff R; EngeLCox J; Krotkov N; Palm S; Rogers R; McCann K; Sparling L; Jordan N; Torres O; Spinhirne J.
(2004). Long-range transport observations of two large forest fire plumes to the northeastern U.S. In
Proceedings of the 22nd International Laser Radar Conference (pp. 683-686.). Paris: European Space
Agency. 190617
Hoff RM; McCann KJ. (2002). Regional East Atmospheric Lidar Mesonet: REALM. In L. Bissonette; G Roy; G
Vallee (Ed.),Lidar Remote Sensing in Atmospheric and Earth Sciences (pp. 281-284). Val-Belair, Quebec:
Def. R&D Can. Valcartier. 190612
Hofmann D; Barnes J; Dutton E; Deshler T; Jager H; Keen R; Osborn M. (2003). Surface-based observations of
volcanic emissions to stratosphere. In Volcanism and the Earth's Atmosphere (pp. 57—73). Washington,
DC: American Geophysical Union. 192062
Hoh E; Zhu L; Hites RA. (2006). Dechlorane plus, a chlorinated flame retardant, in the Great Lakes. Environ
Sci Technol, 40: 1184-1189. 190378
Holben BN; Eck TF; Slutsker I; Tanre D; Buis JP; Setzer A; Vermote E; Reagan JA; Kaufman YJ; Nakajima T;
Lavenu F; Jankowiak I; Smirnov A. (1998). AERONET: A federated instrument network and data
archive for aerosol characterization. , 66: 1-16. 155848
Holben BN; Smirnov A; Eck TF; Slutsker I; Abuhassan N; Newcomb WW; Schafer JS; Tanre D; Chatenet B;
Lavenu F. (2001). An emerging groundbased aerosol climatology: aerosol optical depth from AERONET.
J Geophys Res, 106: 12067-12098. 190618
Holland EA; Dentener FJ; Braswell BH; Sulzman JM. (1999). Contemporary and pre-industrial global reactive
nitrogen budgets. , 46: 7-43. 092051
July 2009
9-281
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Holmqvist Mi Stenroth Pi Berglund Oi Nystrom Pi Olsson Ki Jellyman Di Mcintosh AR; Larsson P. (2006). Low
levels of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in New Zealand eels reflect isolation from atmospheric
sources. Environ Pollut, 141: 532-538. 190380
Hooda V. (2007). Phytoremediation of toxic metals from soil and waste water. J Environ Biol, 28: 367-376.
190382
Hopke PKi Zhou Li Poirot RL. (2005). Reconciling Trajectory Ensemble Receptor Model Results with Emissions.
Environ Sci Technol, 39: 7980-7983. 156567
Horowitz L. (2006). Past, present, and future concentrations of tropospheric ozone and aerosols: Methodology,
ozone evaluation, and sensitivity to aerosol wet removal. J Geophys Res, 111: D22211.l-D22211.16.
190620
Horowitz LW; Walters Si Mauzerall DLi Emmons LKi Rasch PJi Granier Ci Tie Xi Lamarque J-Fi Schultz MGi
Tyndall GSi Orlando JJi Brasseur GP. (2003). A global simulation of tropospheric ozone and related
tracers: description and evaluation of MOZART, version 2. J Geophys Res, 108: in press. 057770
Houlahan JEi Findlay CSi Schmidt BRi Meyer AHi Kuzmin SL. (2000). Quantitative evidence for global
amphibian population declines. , 404: 752—755. 155853
Howe TSi Billings Si Stolzberg RJ. (2004). Sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and hexachlorobenzene
in spruce needles of eastern Alaska. Environ Sci Technol, 38: 3294-3298. 155854
Hoyt Di Frohlich C. (1983). Atmospheric transmission at Davos, Switzerland 1909-1979. Clim Change, 5: 61-71.
190621
Hoyt DV. (1978). A model for the calculation of solar global insolation. , 21: 27"35. 046638
Hsu NCi Tsay SCi King MDi Herman JR. (2004). Aerosol properties over bright-reflecting source regions. IEEE
Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 42: 557-569. 190622
Huebert BJi Bates Ti Russell PBi Shi Gi Kim YJi Kawamura Ki Carmichael Gi Nakajima T. (2003). An overview
of ACE-Asia: Strategies for quantifying the relationships between Asian aerosols and their climatic
impacts. J Geophys Res, 108: 8633. 190623
Hughes MK. (1981). Cycling of trace metals in ecosystems. : . 156578
Hunaiti AAi Al-Oqlah Ai Shannag NMi Abukhalaf IKi Silvestrov NAi Von Deutsch DAi Bayorh MA. (2007).
Toward understanding the influence of soil metals and sulfate content on plant thiols. J Toxicol Environ
Health A, 70: 559-567. 156579
Huneeus Ni O Boucher O. (2007). One-dimensional variational retrieval of aerosol extinction coefficient from
synthetic LIDAR and radiometric measurements. J Geophys Res, 112: D14303.l-D14303.14. 190624
Hung HHi Halsall CJi Blanchard P. (2001). Are PCBs in the Canadian Arctic atmosphere declining? Evidence
from 5 years of monitoring. Environ Sci Technol, 35: 1303-1311. 155856
Hung HHi Halsall CJi Blanchard Pi Li HHi Fellin Pi Stern Gi Rosenberg B. (2002). Temporal trends of
organochlorine pesticides in the Canadian Arctic atmosphere. Environ Sci Technol, 36: 862-868. 155857
Husar RBi Prospero JMi Stowe LL. (1997). Characterization of tropospheric aerosols over the oceans with the
NOAA advanced very high resolution radiometer optical thickness operational product. J Geophys Res,
102: 16,889-16,909. 045900
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). Climate change 2007: the physical science basis
Contribution of Working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change. 092765
IOMi Andrews Ei Sheridan Pi Ogren Ji Ferrare R. (2004). In situ aerosol profiles over the Southern Great Plains
cloud and radiation test bed site: 1. Aerosol optical properties. , 109: D06208. 190058
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (1996). Radiative forcing of climate change. In Climate
Change 1995 (pp. np). New York: Cambridge University Press. 190990
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2007). Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in
Radiative forcing. In Climate Change 2007 (pp. np). New York: Cambridge University Press. 190988
IPCC. (1995). Radiative forcing of climate change and an evaluation of the IPCC IS92 emission scenarios. In
Climate Change 1994 (pp. np). New York: Cambridge University Press. 190991
IPCC. (2001). Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. 156587
IPCCi IOMi Inoue K"ii Takano Hi Yanagisawa Ri Sakurai Mi Ueki Ni Yoshikawa T. (2007). Effects of diesel
exhaust particles on cytokine production by splenocytes stimulated with lipopolysaccharide. J Appl
Toxicol, 27: 95-100. 189430
Ito Ai Penne JE. (2005). Historical emissions of carbonaceous aerosols from biomass and fossil fuel burning for
the period 1870-2000. Global Biogeochem Cycles, 19: GB2028.1-GB2028.14. 190626
Jacob DJi Crawford JH; Kleb MM; Connors VS; Bendura RJ; Raper JL; Sachse GW; Gille JC; Emmons L; Heald
CL. (2003). The Transport and Chemical Evolution over the Pacific (TRACE-P) aircraft mission: design,
execution, and first results. J Geophys Res, 108: 9000. 190987
July 2009
9-282
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Jacobs SV; Evans GW; Catalano R; Dooley D. (1984). Air pollution and depressive symptomatology- Exploratory
analyses of intervening psychosocial factors. , 7- 260-272. 156596
Jacobson MZ. (2000). A physically-based treatment of elemental carbon optics' implications for global direct
forcing of aerosols. Geophys Res Lett, 27- 217-220. 056378
Jacobson MZ. (2001). GATOR-GCMM: a global through urban scale air pollution and weather forecast model- 1.
Model design and treatment of subgrid soil, vegetation, roads, rooftops, water, sea ice, and snow. J
Geophys Res, 106: 5385-5402. 155864
Jacobson MZ. (2002). Control of fossil-fuel particulate black carbon and organic matter, possibly the most
effective method of slowing global warming. J Geophys Res, 107: 4410. 155865
Jacobson MZ. (2003). Development of mixed-phase clouds from multiple aerosol size distributions and the effect
of the clouds on aerosol removal. J Geophys Res, 108 D8, 4245, doi:i0.1029/2002JD002691. 155866
Jacobson MZ. (2003). Reply to comment by D. P. Chock et al. on "Control of fossil-fuel particulate black carbon
and organic matter, possibly the most effective method of slowing global warming". J Geophys Res, 108
D24, 4770, doi:i0.1029/2003JD003707. 155867
Jacobson MZ. (2003). Reply to comment by J. E. Penner on "Control of fossil-fuel particulate black carbon and
organic matter, possibly the most effective method of slowing global warming". J Geophys Res, 108 (D24),
4772, doi:i0.1029/2003JD003403. 155868
Jacobson MZ. (2003). Reply to comment by J. E. Penner on "Control of fossil-fuel particulate black carbon and
organic matter, possibly the most effective method of slowing global warming. J Geophys Res, 108 (D24),
4772, doi:i0.1029/2003JD003403. 189421
Jacobson MZ. (2003). Reply to comment by J. Feichter et al. on "Control of fossil-fuel particulate black carbon
and organic matter, possibly the most effective method of slowing global warming". J Geophys Res, 108
D24, 4768, doi:i0.1029/2002JD003299,. 155869
Jacobson MZ. (2004). Climate response of fossil fuel and biofuel soot, accounting for soot's feedback to snow and
sea ice albedo and emissivity. J Geophys Res, 109, D21201, doi:i0.1029/2004JD004945. 155870
Jacobson MZ. (2006). Effects of externally-through-internally-mixed soot inclusions within clouds and
precipitation on global climate. J Phys Chem B, 110: 6860-6873. 156599
Jacobson MZ; Kaufman YJ. (2006). Wind reduction by aerosol particles. Geophys Res Lett, 33. 090942
Jacobson MZ; Seinfeld JH; Carmichael GR; Streets DG. (2004). The effect on photochemical smog of converting
the U.S. fleet ofgasoline vehicles to modern diesel vehicles. Geophys Res Lett, 31: L02116. 180362
James SM; Little EE; Semlitsch RD. (2004). Effects of multiple routes of cadmium exposure on the hibernation
success of the American toad (Bufo americanus). Arch Environ Contam Toxicol, 46: 518-527. 155874
Jantunen LMM; Bidleman TF. (1996). Air-water gas exchange of hexachlorocyclohexanes (HCHs) and the
enantiomers of crHCH in Arctic regions. J Geophys Res, 101: 28837-28846. 155876
Jantunen LMM; Bidleman TF. (1998). Organochlorine pesticides and enantiomers of chiral pesticides in Arctic
Ocean water. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol, 35. 155877
Jayanty R. (2003). Overview of PM2.5 chemical speciation network program. Presented at . 156605
Jayne JT; Leard DC; Zhang X; Davidovits P; Smith KA; Kolb CE; Worsnop DR. (2000). Development of an
aerosol mass spectrometer for size and composition analysis of submicron particles. Aerosol Sci Technol,
33: 49-70. 190978
Jeong MJ; Li Z; Chu DA; Tsay SC. (2005). Quality and Compatibility Analyses of Global Aerosol Products
Derived from the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer and Moderate Resolution Imaging
Spectroradiometer. J Geophys Res, 110: np. 190977
Jiang H; Feingold G. (2006). Effect of aerosol on warm convective clouds: Aerosol-cloud-surface flux feedbacks in
a new coupled large eddy model. J Geophys Res, 111: D01202. 190976
Jiang J; Oberdrster G; Elder A; Gelein R; Mercer P; Biswas P. (2008). Does nanoparticle activity depend upon
size and crystal phase?. , 2: 33"42. 156609
Jiang W; Smyth S; Giroux E; Roth H; Yin D. (2006). Differences between CMAQ fine mode particle and PM 25
concentrations and their impact on model performance evaluation in the lower Fraser valley. Atmos
Environ, 40: 4973-4985. 133165
Jiao XC; Xu FL; Dawson R; Chen SH; Tao S. (2007). Adsorption and absorption of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons to rice roots. , 148: 230-235. 155879
Jirak IL; Cotton WR. (2006). Effect of air pollution on precipitation along the Front Range of the Rocky
Mountains. , 45: 236-245. 156612
Johnson D; Hale B. (2008). Fine root decomposition and cycling of Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn at forest sites near
smelters in Sudbury, ON, and Rouyn-Noranda, QU, Canada. , 14: 41-53. 155881
Johnson DB. (1982). The role of giant and ultragiant aerosol particles in warm rain initiation. , 39: 448-460.
190973
July 2009
9-283
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Johnson MS; Franke LS; Lee RB; Holladay SD. (1999). Bioaccumulation of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene and
polychlorinated biphenyls through two routes of exposure in a terrestrial amphibian- Is the dermal route
significant?. Environ Toxicol Chem, 18: 873-878. 155880
Jones GS; Jones A; Roberts DL; Stott PA; Williams KD. (2005). Sensitivity of global-scale climate change
attribution results to inclusion of fossil fuel black carbon aerosol. Geophys Res Lett, 32, L14701,
doi:i0.1029/2005GL023370. 155885
Jones JW; Bogat GA. (1978). Air pollution and human aggression. Psychol Rep, 43: 721-722. 190396
Jones PD; Moberg A; Osborn TJ; Briffa KR. (2003). Surface climate responses to explosive volcanic eruptions
seen in long European temperature records and mid-to-high latitude tree-ring density around the
Northern Hemisphere. In Robock A; Oppenheimer C (Ed.),Volcanism and the earth's atmosphere (pp.
239-254). Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union. 192278
Joshi M; Shine K. (2003). A GCM study of volcanic eruption s as a cause of increased stratospheric water vapor.
J Clim, 16: 3525-3534. 192327
Joynt J; Bischoff M; Turco R; Konopka A; Nakatsu CH. (2006). Microbial community analysis of soils
contaminated with lead, chromium and petroleum hydrocarbons. Microb Ecol, 51: 209-219. 155887
Junker C; Liousse C. (2008). A global emission inventory of carbonaceous aerosol from historic records of fossil
fuel and biofuel consumption for the period 1860-1997. ,8- 1195-1207. 190971
Kahn R; Banerjee P; McDonald D. (2001). The sensitivity of multiangle imaging to natural mixtures of aerosols
over ocean. J Geophys Res, 106: 18219-18238. 190969
Kahn R; Banerjee P; McDonald D; Diner D. (1998). Sensitivity of multiangle imaging to aerosol optical depth,
and to pure-particle size distribution and composition over ocean. J Geophys Res, 103: 32195-32213.
190970
Kahn R; Gaitley B; Martonchik J; Diner D; Crean K; Holben B. (2005). Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer
(MISR) global aerosol optical depth validation based on 2 years of coincident Aerosol Robotic Network
(AERONET) observations. J Geophys Res, 110: D10S04. 189961
Kahn R; Li W', Martonchik J; Bruegge C; Diner D; Gaitley B; Abdou W; Dubovik 0; Holben B; Smirnov A; Jin Z;
Clark D. (2005). MISR low-light-level calibration, and implications for aerosol retrieval over dark water. ,
62: 1032-1052. 190965
Kahn R; Li W', Moroney C; Diner D; Martonchik J; Fishbein E. (2007). Aerosol source plume physical
characteristics from space-based multiangle imaging. J Geophys Res, 112: D11205. 190964
Kahn RA Gaitley BJ; Martonchik JV; Diner DJ Crean KA; Holben B. (2005). MISR global aerosol optical depth
validation based on two years of coincident AERONET observations. J Geophys Res, 110: D10S04.
190966
Kahn RA Garay MJ; Nelson DL; Yau KK Bull M; Gaitley BJ; Martonchik JV; Levy R. (2007). Satellite-derived
aerosol optical depth over dark water from MISR and MODIS: Comparisons with AERONET and
implications for climatological studies. J Geophys Res, 112: D18205. 190963
Kalashnikova O; Kahn R. (2006). Ability of multiangle remote sensing observations to identify and distinguish
mineral dust types: Part 2 Sensitivity over dark water. J Geophys Res, 111: D11207. 190962
Kaldorf M; Kuhn AJ; Schroder WH; Hildebrandt U; Bothe H. (1999). Selective element deposits in maize
colonized by a heavy metal tolerance conferring arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. J Plant Physiol, 154:
718-728. 190399
Kamh GME. (2005). The impact of landslides and salt weathering on Roman structures at high latitudes -
Conway Castle, Great Britain: A case study. , 48: 238-254. 155888
Kandeler E; Kampichler C; Horak O. (1996). Influence of heavy metals on the functional diversity of soil
microbial communities. , 23: 299-306. 094392
Kappos AD; Bruckmann P; Eikmann T; Englert N; Heinrich U; Hoppe P; Koch E; Krause GH; Kreyling WG;
Rauchfuss K; Rombout P; Schulz-KLemp V; Thiel WR; Wichmann HE. (2004). Health effects of particles
in ambient air. Int J Hyg Environ Health, 207: 399-407. 087922
Kapustin VN; Clarke AD; Shinozuka Y; Howell S; V Brekhovskikh V; Nakajima T; Higurashi A. (2006). On the
determination of a cloud condensation nuclei from satellite: Challenges and possibilities. J Geophys Res,
111: DQ4202.190961
Kaufman Y. (1987). Satellite sensing of aerosol absorption. J Geophys Res, 92: 4307-4317. 190960
Kaufman Y; Boucher O; Tanre D; Chin M; Remer L; Takemura T. (2005). Aerosol anthropogenic component
estimated from satellite data. Geophys Res Lett, 32: L17804. 155891
Kaufman Y; Fraser R. (1997). The effect of smoke particles on clouds and climate forcing. , 277: 1636-1639.
190958
Kaufman Y; Haywood J; Hobbs P; Hart W', KLeidman R; Schmid B. (2003). Remote sensing of vertical
distributions of smoke aerosol off the coast of Africa. Geophys Res Lett, 30: 1831. 190954
July 2009
9-284
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Kaufman YD; Tanre D; Boucher O. (2002). A satellite view of aerosols in the climate system. Nature, 419- 215"
223. 190956
Kaufman YJ; Hobbs PV; Kirchoff VWJH; Artaxo P; Remer LA; Holben BN; King MD; Ward DE; Prins EM;
Longo KM; Mattos LF; Nobre CA; Spinhirne JD; Ji Q; Thompson AM; Gleason JF; Christopher SA; Tsay
S"C. (1998). Smoke, clouds, and radiation-'Brazil (SCAR-B) experiment. J Geophys Res, 103- 31783"
31808. 089989
Kaufman YJ; Koren I. (2006). Smoke and pollution aerosol effect on cloud cover. , 313- 655-658. 190951
Kaufman YJ; Martins JV; Remer LA; Schoeberl MR; Yamasoe MA. (2002). Satellite retrieval of aerosol
absorption over the oceans using sunglint. Geophys Res Lett, 29- 34.1-34.4. 190955
Kaufman YJ; Nakajima T. (1993). Effect of Amazon smoke on cloud microphysics and albedo—Analysis from
satellite imagery. , 32: 729-744. 190959
Kaufman YJ; Setzer A; Ward D; Tanre D; Holben BN; Menzel P; Pereira MC; Rasmussen R. (1992). Biomass
Burning Airborne and Spaceborne Experiment in the Amazonas (BASE-A). J Geophys Res, 97: 14581-
14599. 044557
Kavouras IG; Etyemezian V; DuBois DW! Xu J; Pitchford M. (2009). Source reconciliation of atmospheric dust
causing visibility impairment in Class I areas of the western United States. , 114: x. 191976
Kavouras IG; Etyemezian V; Xu J; DuBois DW; Green M; Pitchford M. (2007). Assessment of the local
windblown component of dust in the western United States. J Geophys Res, 112: . 156630
Kenski DM; Gay D; Fitzsimmons S. (2004). Ammonia and its role in midwestern haze. Presented at Regional
and Global Perspectives on Haze: Causes, Consequences and Controversies Visibility Specialty
Conference, Asheville, NC. 192078
Kerr R. (2007). Another global warming icon comes under attack. , 317: 28"29. 190950
Kiehl JT. (2007). Twentieth century climate model response and climate sensitivity. Geophys Res Lett, 34: np.
190949
Kiikkila O. (2003). Heavy-metal pollution and remediation of forest soil around the Harjavalta Cu_Ni smelter, in
SW Finland. , 37: 399-415. 156637
Kim CG; Bell JNB; Power SA. (2003). Effects of soil cadmium on Pinus sylvestris L. seedlings. Plant Soil, 257:
443-449. 155899
Kim MK; Lau KM; Chin M; Kim KM; Sud Y; Walker GK. (2006). Atmospheric teleconnection over Eurasia
induced by aerosol radiative forcing during boreal spring. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 19: 4700-4718.
190917
Kim SW; Yoon SC; Kim J. (2008). Columnar Asian dust particle properties observed by sun/sky radiometers
from 2000 to 2006 in Korea. Atmos Environ, 42: 492-504. 130785
Kim Y; Hatsushika H; Muskett RR; Yamazaki K. (2005). Possible effect of boreal wildfire soot on Arctic sea ice
and Alaska glaciers. Atmos Environ, 39: 3513-3520. 155900
King M; Kaufman Y; Tanre DiNakajima T. (1999). Remote sensing of tropospheric aerosols from space: Past,
present, and future. , 80: 2229-2259. 190635
King MD; Platnick S; Moeller CC; Revercomb HE; Chu DA. (2003). Remote sensing of smoke, land, and clouds
from the NASA ER-2 during SAFARI 2000. J Geophys Res, 108: SAF38.1-SAF38.12. 094395
Kinne S; Schulz M; Textor C; Guibert S; Balkanski Y; Bauer SE; Berntsen T; Berglen TF; Boucher O; Chin M;
Collins W; Dentener F; Diehl T; Easter R; Feichter J; Fillmore D; Ghan S; Ginoux P; Gong S; Grini A;
Hendricks J; Herzog M; Horowitz L; Isaksen I; Iversen T; Kirkevag A; Kloster S; Koch D; Kristjansson
JE; Krol M; Lauer A; Lamarque JF; Lesins G; Liu X; Lohmann U; Montanaro V; Myhre G; Penner J;
Pitari G; Reddy S; Seland O; Stier P; Takemura T; Tie X. (2006). An AeroCom initial assessment—optical
properties in aerosol component modules of global models. , 6: 1815-1834. 155903
Kirchstetter TW; Harley RA; Kreisberg NM; Stolzenberg MR; Hering SV. (1999). On-road measurement of fine
particle and nitrogen oxide emissions from light" and heavy-duty motor vehicles. Atmos Environ, 33:
2955-2968. 010642
Kirkbride MP; Dugmore JA. (2003). Glaciological response to distal tephra fallout from the 1947 eruption of
Hekla, south Iceland. , 49: 420-428. 156645
Kleeman MJ; Hughes LS; Allen JO; Cass GR. (1999). Source contributions to the size and composition
distribution of atmospheric particles: southern California in September 1996. Environ Sci Technol, 33:
4331-4341. 011286
Kleidman R; O'Neill N; Remer L; Kaufman Y; Eck T; Tanre D; Dubovik O; Holben B. (2005). Comparison of
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET)
remote-sensing retrievals of aerosol fine mode fraction over ocean. J Geophys Res, 110: 1"16. 190175
July 2009
9-285
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
KLeinman MT; Araujo JA; Nel A; Sioutas Ci Campbell A; Cong PQ; Li H; Bondy SC. (2008). Inhaled ultrafine
particulate matter affects CNS inflammatory processes and may act via MAP kinase signaling pathways.
Toxicol Lett, 178: 127-130. 190074
Knutti R; Stocker TF; Joos F; Plattner GK. (2002). Constraints on radiative forcing and future climate change
from observations and climate model ensembles. Nature, 416: 719-723. 190178
Knutti R; Stocker TF; Joos F> Plattner GK. (2003). Probabilistic climate change projections using neural
networks. , 21: 257-272. 190180
Koch D. (2001). Transport and direct radiative forcing of carbonaceous and sulfate aerosols in the GISS GCM. J
Geophys Res, 106: 20311-20332. 192054
Koch D; Bond TC; Streets D; Unger Ni van der Werf GR. (2007). Global impact of aerosols from particular
source regions and sectors. J Geophys Res, 112: D02205. 190185
Koch D; Hansen J. (2005). Distant origins of Arctic black carbon: A Goddard Institute for Space Studies ModelE
experiment. J Geophys Res, 110: D04204. 190183
Koch D; Schmidt G> Field C. (2006). Sulfur, sea salt, and radionuclide aerosols in GISS ModelE. J Geophys Res,
111: DQ6206.190184
Kogan YL; Lilly DK; Kogan ZN; Filyushkin V. (1994). The effect of CCN regeneration on the evolution of
stratocumulus cloud layers. , 33: 137-150. 190186
Koren L Kaufman YJ; Remer LA; Martins JV. (2004). Measurement of the effect of Amazon smoke on inhibition
of cloud formation. Science, 303: 1342-1345. 190187
Koren I; Kaufman YJ; Rosenfeld D; Remer LA; Rudich Y. (2005). Aerosol invigoration and restructuring of
Atlantic convective clouds. Geophys Res Lett, 32: L14828. 190188
Koren I; Martins JV; Remer LA; Afargan H. (2008). Smoke invigoration versus inhibition of clouds over the
Amazon. , 321: 946-949. 190193
Koren I; Remer KA; Kaufman YJ; Rudich Y; Martins JV. (2007). On the twilight zone between clouds and
aerosols. Geophys Res Lett, 34: L08805. 190192
Koren I; Remer LA; Longo K. (2007). Reversal of trend of biomass burning in the Amazon. Geophys Res Lett, 34:
L20404. 190189
Korsnes R; Pavlova O; Godtliebsen F. (2002). Assessment of potential transport of pollutants into the Barents
Sea via sea ice--an observational approach. Mar Pollut Bull, 44: 861-869. 156657
Kroll JH; Ng NL; Murphy SM; Flagan RC; Seinfeld JH. (2006). Secondary organic aerosol formation from
isoprene photooxidation. Environ Sci Technol, 40: 1869-1877. 190195
Krueger AJ; Schaefer SJ; Krotkov N; Bluth G; Barker S. (2000). Ultraviolet remote sensing ofvolcanic
emissions. In Remote Sensing of Active Volcanism (pp. 25-43). Washington, DC: American Geophysical
Union. 192234
Kruger O; Grasl H. (2002). The indirect aerosol effect over Europe. Geophys Res Lett, 29: 1925. 190200
Kruysse A. (1971). Acute inhalation toxicity of acrolein in hamsters. Central Institute for Nutrition and Food
Research. The Netherlands. R 3516. 192236
Kucera T; Horakova H; Sonska A. (2008). Toxic metal ions in photoautotrophic organisms. , 46: 481-489. 190408
Kucharski J; Wyszkowska J. (2004). Inter-relationship between number of microorganisms and spring barley
yield and degree of soil contamination with copper. , 50: 243—249. 156662
Kuki KN; Oliva MA; Costa AC. (2009). The simulated effects of iron dust and acidity during the early stages of
establishment of two coastal plant species. , 196: 287-295. 190411
Kuki KN; Oliva MA; Pereira EG; Costa AC; Cambraia J. (2008). Effects of simulated deposition of acid mist and
iron ore particulate matter on photosynthesis and the generation of oxidative stress in Schinus
terebinthifolius Radii and Sophora tomentosa L. , 403(l"3): 207-214. 155346
LaBrecque JJ; Benzo Z; Alfonso JA; Cordoves Manuelita Quintal PR; Gomez CV Marcano E. (2004). The
concentrations of selected trace elements in clams, Trivela mactroidea along the Venezuelan coast in the
state of Miranda. Mar Pollut Bull, 49: 659-667. 155913
Lack D; Lovejoy E; Baynard T; Pettersson A; Ravishankara A. (2006). Aerosol absorption measurements using
photoacoustic spectroscopy: sensitivity, calibration, and uncertainty developments. Aerosol Sci Technol,
40: 697-708. 190203
Lakzian A; Murphy P; Turner A; Beynon JL; Giller KE. (2002). Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae
populations in soils with increasing heavy metal contamination: abundance, plasmid profiles, diversity
and metal tolerance. Soil Biol Biochem, 34: 519-529. 156671
Lambert A; Grainger RG; Remedios JJ; Rodgers CD; Corney M; Taylor FW. (1993). Measurements of the
evolution of the Mt. Pinatubo aerosol cloud by ISAMS. Geophys Res Lett, 20: 1287-1290. 192231
July 2009
9-286
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Lambert MRK. (1997). Environmental effects of heavy spillage from a destroyed pesticide store near Hargeisa
(Somaliland) assessed during the dry season, using reptiles and amphibians as bioindicators. Arch
Environ Contam Toxicol, 32- 80—93. 155916
Landers DH; Simonich SL; Jaffe DA; Geiser LH; Campbell DH; Schwindt AR; Schreck CB; Kent ML; Hafner
WD; Taylor HE; Hageman KJ; Usenko S; Ackerman LK; Schrlau JE; Rose NL; Blett TF; Erway MM.
(2008). The Fate, Transport and Ecological Impacts of Airborne Contaminants in Western National
Parks (USA). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, NHEERL,
Western Ecology Division. Corvallis, Oregon. 191181
Lanno R; Wells J; Conder J; Bradham K; Basta N. (2004). The bioavailability of chemicals in soil for
earthworms. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 57- 39"47. 190415
Larson VE; Golaz J-C; Jiang H; Cotton WR. (2005). Supplying local microphysics parameterizations with
information about subgrid variability- Latin hypercube sampling. J Trace Elem Med Biol, 62- 4010-4026.
190220
Larson VE; Wood R; Field PR; Golaz J-C. (2001). Small-scale and mesoscale variability of scalars in cloudy
boundary layers' One-dimensional probability density functions. J Trace Elem Med Biol, 58- 1978-1996.
190212
Latimer DA; Ireson RG. (1980). Workbook for estimating visibility impairment. U.S. Enviornmental Protection
Agency. Research Triangle Park, NC. EPA-450/4-80-031. 035723
Lau K-M; Kim K"M. (2006). Observational relationships between aerosol and Asian monsoon rainfall, and
circulation. Geophys Res Lett, 33: L21810. 190226
Lau K-M; Kim K"M; Walker G; Sud G. (2008). A GCM study of the possible impacts of Saharan dust heating on
the water cycle and climate of the tropical Atlantic and Caribbean regions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, in
press^ in press. 190229
Lau K; Kim M; Kim K. (2006). Asian summer monsoon anomalies induced by aerosol direct forcing—the role of
the Tibetan Plateau. , 36: 855-864. 190223
Law RJ; Alaee M; Allchin CR; Boon JP; Lebeuf M; Lepom P; Ster GA. (2003). Levels and trends of
polybrominated diphenylethers and other brominated flame retardants in wildlife. Environ Int, 29: 757"
770. 190420
Lawson ST; Scherbatskoy TD; Malcolm EG; Keeler GJ. (2003). Cloud water and throughfall deposition of
mercury and trace elements in a high elevation spruce-fir forest at Mt Mansfield, Vermont. J Environ
Monit, 5: 578-583. 089371
Leahy L; Anderson T; Eck T; Bergstrom R. (2007). A synthesis of single scattering albedo of biomass burning
aerosol over southern Africa during SAFARI 2000. Geophys Res Lett, 34: L12814. 190232
Leaitch WR; Banic CM; Isaac GA; Couture MD; Liu PSK; Gultepe I; et al. (1996). Physical and chemical
observations in marine stratus during the 1993 North Atlantic Regional Experiment: Factors controlling
cloud droplet number concentrations. J Geophys Res, 101: 29123-29135. 190354
Leaitch WR; Isaac GA; Strapp JW; Banic CM; Wiebe HA. (1992). The relationship between cloud droplet
number concentrations and anthropogenic pollution: observations and climatic implications. J Geophys
Res, 97: 2463-2474. 045270
LeBlanc GA. (1995). Trophic-level differences in the bioconcentration of chemicals: Implications in assessing
environmental biomagnification. Environ Sci Technol, 29: 154-160. 155921
Lee JK. (2006). Toxicity and tissue distribution of magnetic nanoparticles in mice [erratum]. Toxicol Sci, 90:
267. 088968
Lee T; Yu XY; Ayres B; Kreidenweis SM; Malm WC; Collett JL. (2008). Observations of fine and coarse particle
nitrate at several rural locations in the United States. Atmos Environ, 42: 2720-2732. 156686
Lee TE; Miller SD; Turk FJ; Schueler C; Julian R; Deyo S; et al. (2006). The NPOESS VIIRS day/night visible
sensor. , 87: 191-199. 190358
Lei YD; Wania F. (2004). Is rain or snow a more efficient scavenger of organic chemicals?. Atmos Environ, 38:
3557-3571. 127880
Lelieveld J; Berresheim H; Borrmann S; Crutzen PJ; Dentener FJ; Fischer H; et al. (2002). Global air pollution
crossroads over the Mediterranean . , 298: 794-799. 190361
Levin Z; Cotton WR. (2008). Report from the WMO/ IUGG International Aerosol Precipitation Science,
Assessment Group (IAPSAG). In Aerosol pollution impact on precipitation: A scientific review (pp. 482).
Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization. 190375
Levine JS; Pinto JP. (1998). The production of CO by biomass burning. Presented at . 029599
Levy R; Remer L; Dubovik O. (2007). Global aerosol optical properties and application to MODIS aerosol
retrieval over land. J Geophys Res, 112: D13210. 190377
July 2009
9-287
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Levy Ri Remer Li Mattoo Si Vermote Ei Kaufman Y. (2007). Second-generation algorithm for retrieving aerosol
properties over land from MODIS spectral reflectance. J Geophys Res, 112- D13211. 190379
Lewis ERi Schwartz SE. (2004). Sea salt aerosol production- Mechanisms, methods, measurements and models'
A critical review. Washington, DC- American Geophysical Union. 192023
Li R-Ri Kaufman YJi Hao WMi Salmon JMi Gao B"C . (2004). A technique for detecting burn scars using
MODIS data. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 42- 1300-1308. 190386
Li Y-F; MacDonald RW; Jantunen LMMi Harner T; Bidleman TFi Stachen WMJ. (2002). The transport of 8"
hexachlorocyclohexane to the western Arctic Ocean- a contrast to aHCH. Sci Total Environ, 291- 229-246.
156691
Li Zi Chen Hi Cribb Mi Dickerson Ri Holben Bi Li Ci et al. (2007). Preface to special section on East Asian
studies of tropospheric aerosols' An international regional experiment (EAST-AIRE). J Geophys Res, 112-
D22S00.190392
Lin CJi Pehkonen SO. (1999). The chemistry of atmospheric mercury- a review. Atmos Environ, 33- 2067-2070.
190426
Lin Hi Tao Si Zuo Qi Coveney RM. (2007). Uptake of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by maize plants. Environ
Pollut, 148: 614-619. 155933
Lindberg SEi Brooks Si Linn CJi Scott KJi Landis MSi Stevens RKi Goodsite Mi Richter A. (2002). Dynamic
oxidation of gaseous mercury in the Arctic troposphere at polar sunrise. Environ Sci Technol, 36: 1245"
1256. 190429
Lindesay JAi Andreae MOi Goldammer JGi Harris Gi Annegarn HJi Garstang Mi et al. (1996). International
Geosphere Biosphere Programme/International Global Atmospheric Chemistry SAFARI "92 field
experiment: Background and overview. J Geophys Res, 23521-23530: 101. 190403
Lingua Gi Franchin Ci Todeschini Vi Castiglione Si SBiondii Burlando Bi Parravicini Vi PTorrigianii GBerta.
(2008). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi differentially affect the response to high zinc concentrations of two
registered poplar clones. , 153: 137-147. 155935
Liou KNi Ou S"C. (1989). The role of cloud microphysical processes in climate: an assessment from a one-
dimensional perspective. J Geophys Res, 94: 8599-8607. 190407
Liousse C> Penner JEi Chuang Ci Walton JJi Eddleman Hi Cachier H. (1996). A global three-dimensional model
study of carbonaceous aerosols. J Geophys Res, 101: 19,411-19,432. 078158
Liu Hi Pinker Ri Holben B. (2005). A global view of aerosols from merged transport models, satellite, and
ground observations. J Geophys Res, 110: D10S15. 190414
Liu J; Ballaney Mi Al-Alem Ui Quan Ci Jin Xi Perera Fi Chen LCi Miller RL. (2008). Combined Inhaled Diesel
Exhaust Particles and Allergen Exposure Alter Methylation of T Helper Genes and IgE Production In
Vivo. Toxicol Sci, 102: 76-81. 156709
Liu Li Lacis AAi Carlson BEi Mishchenko ML Cairns B. (2006). Assessing Goddard Institute for Space Studies
ModelE aerosol climatology using satellite and ground-based measurements. J Geophys Res, 111:
D20212.190422
Liu Xi Penner Ji Das Bi Bergmann Di Rodriguez Ji Strahan Si et al. (2007). Uncertainties in global aerosol
simulations: Assessment using three meteorological data sets. J Geophys Res, 112: D11212. 190427
Liu Yi Koutrakis P. (2007). Estimating Fine Particulate Matter Component Concentrations and Size
Distributions Using Satellite- Retrieved Fractional Aerosol Optical Depth: Part 1—Method Development.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 57: 1351-1359. 187007
Liu, Yi Franklin, Mi Kahn, Ri Koutrakis, P. (2007). Using aerosol optical thickness to predict ground-level PM
sub(2) sub(.) sub(5) concentrations in the St. Louis area: A comparison between MISR and MODIS . , 107:
33-44. 192180
Loeb Ni Kato S. (2002). Top-of-atmosphere direct radiative effect of aerosols over the tropical oceans from the
Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) satellite instrument. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,
15: 1474-1484. 190432
Loeb Ni Manalo-Smith N. (2005). Top-of-Atmosphere direct radiative effect of aerosols over global oceans from
merged CERES and MODIS observations. J Clim, 18: 3506-3526. 190433
Loeb NGi Kato Si Loukachine Ki Smith NM. (2005). Angular distribution models for top-of-atmosphere radiative
flux estimation from the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System instrument on the Terra
Satellite, part I: Methodology. , 22: 338—351. 190436
Lohman Ui Feichter J. (2005). Global indirect aerosol effects: a review. , 5- 715-737. 155942
Lohmann Ui Feichter Ji Chuang CCi Penner JE. (1999). Prediction of the number of cloud droplets in the
ECHAM GCM. J Geophys Res, 104: 9169-9198. 190443
Lohmann Ui Koren Ii Kaufman YJ. (2006). Disentangling the role of microphysical and dynamical effects in
determining cloud properties over the Atlantic. Geophys Res Lett, 33: L09802. 190451
July 2009
9-288
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Lohmann Ui Leaitch WR; Barrie L; Law K; Yi Y> Bergmann D; et al. (2001). Vertical distributions of sulfur
species simulated by large scale atmospheric models in COSAM- Comparison with observations. , 53- 646
- 672. 190448
Lorusso Si Marabelli Mi Troili M. (1997). Air pollution and the deterioration of historic monuments. J Environ
Pathol Toxicol Oncol, 16: 171-173. 084534
Lowenthal DHi Kumar N. (2003). PM2.5 mass and light extinction reconstruction in IMPROVE. J Air Waste
Manag Assoc, 53: 1109-1120. 156712
Lowenthal DHi Rogers CFi Saxena Pi Watson JGi Chow JC. (1995). Sensitivity of estimated light extinction
coefficients to model assumptions and measurement errors. Atmos Environ, 29: 751-766. 045134
Lu M-Li Feingold Gi Jonsson Hi Chuang Pi Gates Hi Flagan RCi Seinfeld JH. (2008). Aerosol-cloud
relationships in continental shallow cumulus. J Geophys Res, 113: D15201. 190455
Lubin Di Vogelmann AM. (2006). A climatologically significant aerosol longwave indirect effect in the Arctic.
Nature, 439: 453-456. 190466
Lubin DSi Satheesh Si McFarquar Gi Heymsfield A. (2002). Longwave radiative forcing of Indian Ocean
tropospheric aerosol. J Geophys Res, 107: 8004. 190463
Lucaciu Ai Timofte Li Culicov Oi Frontasyeva MVi Oprea Ci Cucu-Man Si Mocanu Ri Steinnes E. (2004).
Atmospheric deposition of trace elements in Romania studied by the moss biomonitoring technique. , 49:
533-548. 155947
Lunackova Li Masarovicova Ei Kraova Ki Stresko V. (2003). Response of fast growing woody plants from family
Salicaceae to cadmium treatment. , 70: 576-585. 155948
Luo Yi Lu Di Zhou X> Li W> He Q. (2001). Characteristics of the spatial distribution and yearly variation of
aerosol optical depth over China in last 30 years. J Geophys Res, 106: 14501. 190467
Leon Ji Tanre D; Pelon J; Kaufman Yi Haywood Ji Chatenet B. (2003). Profiling of a Saharan dust outbreak
based on a synergy between active and passive remote sensing. J Geophys Res, 108: 8575. 190366
Lopez Alonso Mi Benedito JLi Miranda Mi Castillo Ci Hernandez Ji Shore RF. (2002). Cattle as biomonitors of
environmental semi-metal and trace metal concentrations in Galicia (NW Spain). Arch Environ Contam
Toxicol, 43: 103-108. 155943
Lopez Alonso Mi Benedito JLi Miranda Mi Castillo Ci Hernandez Ji Shore RF. (2003). Mercury concentrations in
cattle from NW Spain. Sci Total Environ, 302: 93-100 . 155945
Lopez Alonso Mi Benedito JLi Miranda Mi Fernandez JAi Castillo Ci Hernandez Ji Shore RF. (2003). Large-
scale spatial variation in mercury concentrations in cattle in NW Spain. Environ Pollut, 125: 173-181.
155944
Mace BLi Bell PA; Loomis RJ. (2004). Visibility and Natural Quiet in National Parks and Wilderness Areas:
Psychological Considerations. , 36: 5-31. 180255
Mackay D. (1991). Multimedia environmental models: the fugacity approach. Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers.
042941
Macleod M; McKone TE; Mackay D. (2005). Mass balance for mercury in the San Francisco Bay area. Environ
Sci Technol, 39: 6721-6729. 155954
Madrid L; Diaz-Barrientos E> Madrid F. (2002). Distribution of heavy metal contents of urban soils in parks of
Seville. Chemosphere, 49: 1301—1309. 155956
Magi B; Hobbs P; Kirchstetter T> Novakov T> Hegg D; Gao Si et al. (2005). Aerosol properties and chemical
apportionment of aerosol optical depth at locations off the United States East Coast in July and August
2001. J Trace Elem Med Biol, 62: 919-933. 190468
Malm W; Bell P; McGlothin GE. (1984). Field testing a methodology for assessing the importance of good visual
air quality. Presented at . 044292
Malm WC. (1999). Introduction to visibility. 025037
Malm WC; Day DE. (2001). Estimates of aerosol species scattering characteristics as a function of relative
humidity. Atmos Environ, 35: 2845-2860. 190431
Malm WC; Day DE; Kreidenweis SM; Collett JL; Lee T. (2003). Humidity dependent optical properties of fine
particle during the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational Study (BRAVO). , 108: 4279.
190434
Malm WC; Hand JL. (2007). An examination of the physical and optical properties of aerosols collected in the
IMPROVE program. Atmos Environ, 41: 3407-3427. 155962
Malm WC; Pitchford ML. (1997). Comparison of calculated sulfate scattering efficiencies as estimated from size-
resolved particle measurements at three national locations. Atmos Environ, 31: 1315-1325. 002519
Malm WC; Pitchford ML; McDade C; Ashbaugh LL. (2007). Coarse particle speciation at selected locations in
the rural continental United States. Atmos Environ, 41: 2225-2239. 156730
July 2009
9-289
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Malm WC; Schichtel BA; Ames RB; Gebhart KA. (2002). A ten-Year spatial and temporal trend of sulfate across
the United States. J Geophys Res, : . 156727
Malm WC; Schichtel BA; Pitchford ML; Ashbaugh LL; Eldred RA. (2004). Spatial and monthly trends in
speciated fine particle concentration in the United States. J Geophys Res, 109- 3306. 156728
Malm WC; Trijonis J; Sisler J; Pitchford M; Dennis RL. (1994). Assessing the effect of S02 emission changes on
visibility. Atmos Environ, 28: 1023-1034. 044920
Marinoni N> Birelli MP; Rostagno C; Pavese A. (2003). The effects of atmospheric multipollutants on modern
concrete. Atmos Environ, 37: 4701-4712. 092520
Markiewicz Patkowska J; Hursthouse A; Przybyla-Kij H. (2005). The interaction of heavy metals with urban
soils: sorption behaviour of Cd, Cu, Cr, Pb and Zn with a typical mixed brownfield deposit. Environ Int,
31: 513-521. 155963
Martin MH; Coughtrey PJ. (1981). Impact of metals on ecosystem function and productivity. In Lepp, N. W.
(Ed.),Effect of heavy metal pollution on plants: volume 2, metals in the environment (pp. 119-158).
Barking, United Kingdom: Applied Science Publishers. 047727
Martins J; Tanre D; Remer L; Kaufman Y; Mattoo S; Levy R; et al. (2002). MODIS cloud screening for remote
sensing of aerosol over oceans using spatial variability. Geophys Res Lett, 29: MOD4. 190470
Martonchik J; Diner D; Crean K; Bull M. (2002). Regional aerosol retrieval results from MISR. IEEE Trans
Geosci Remote Sens, 40: 1520-1531. 190490
Martonchik J; Diner D; Pinty B; Verstraete M; Myneni R; Knjazikhin Y; Gordon H. (1998). Determination of
land and ocean reflective, radiative, and biophysical properties using multiangle imaging. IEEE Trans
Geosci Remote Sens, 36: 1266-1281. 190484
Martonchik JD; Diner D; Kahn R; Verstraete M; Pinty B; Gordon H; Ackerman T. (1998). Techniques for the
Retrieval of aerosol properties over land and ocean using multiangle data. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote
Sens, 36: 1212-1227. 190472
Masclet PP; Hoyau V; Jaffrezo JL; Cachier H. (2000). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons deposition on the ice
sheet of Greenland. Part I. Superficial snow. Atmos Environ, 34: 3195-3207. 155966
Massicotte R; Robidoux PY; Sauve S; Flipo D; Fournier M; Trottier B. (2003). Immune response of earthworms
(Lumbricus terrestris, Eisenia andrei and Aporrectodea tuberculata) following in situ soil exposure to
atmospheric deposition from a cement factory. J Environ Monit, 5- 774-779. 155968
Massie S; Torres O; Smith S. (2004). Total ozone mapping spectrometer (TOMS) observations of increases in
Asian aerosol in winter from 1979 to 2000. J Geophys Res, 109: D18211. 190492
Matheson MA Coakley JA; Tahnk WR. (2005). Aerosol and cloud property relationships for summertime
stratiform clouds in the northeastern Atlantic from Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer
observations. J Geophys Res, 110: D24204. 190494
Matsui T; Masunaga H; Kreidenweis SM; Pielke RA; Tao W"K; Chin M; et al. (2006). Satellite-based assessment
of marine low cloud variability associated with aerosol, atmospheric stability, and the diurnal cycle. J
Geophys Res, 111: D17204. 190498
Matsui T; Pielke R;. (2006). Measurement-based estimation of the spatial gradient of aerosol radiative forcing.
Geophys Res Lett, 33: LI 1813. 190495
Matthias I, et al.. (2004). Multiyear aerosol observations with dual wavelength Raman lidar in the framework of
EARLINET. J Geophys Res, 109, D13203, doi:i0.1029/2004JD004600: . 155971
Mayo JM; Legge AH; Yeung EC; Krupa SV; Bogner JC. (1992). The effects of sulphur gas and elemental sulphur
dust deposition on Pinus contorta x Pinus banksiana: Cell walls and water relations. , 76: 43-50. 155974
McComiskey A; Feingold G. (2008). Quantifying error in the radiative forcing of the first aerosol indirect effect.
Geophys Res Lett, 35: L20810. 190517
McComiskey A; Feingold G; Frisch AS; Turner D; Miller M; Chiu JC; et al. (2008). An assessment of aerosol-
cloud interactions in marine stratus clouds based on surface remote sensing. J Geophys Res, 114:
D09203.190525
McComiskey A; Schwartz SE; Schmid B; Guan H; Lewis ER; Ricchiazzi P; et al. (2008). Direct aerosol forcing:
Calculation from observables and sensitivity to inputs. J Geophys Res, 113: D09202. 190523
McCormick M; Trepte C. (1987). Polar stratospheric optical depth observed between 1978 and 1985. J Geophys
Res, 92: 4297-4306. 192328
McCormick R; Ludwig J. (1967). Climate modification by atmospheric aerosols. , 9: 1358 - 1359. 190528
McDade C. (2006). Summary of IMPROVE Nitrate Measurements. Retrieved 29-JUL-09, from
http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/publications/GrayLit/gray_literature.htm. 192075
Mcfiggans G; Artaxo P; Baltensperger U; Coe H; Facchini MC;Feingold G; et al. (2006). The effect of physical
and chemical aerosol properties on warm cloud droplet activation. , 6: 2593-2649. 190532
McGowan TF; Lipinski GE; Santoleri JJ. (1993). New rules affect the handling of waste fuels. 122-128. 046731
July 2009
9-290
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
McMurry PH. (2000). A review of atmospheric aerosol measurements. Atmos Environ, 34- 1959-1999. 081517
Meehl GA; Washington WM; Ammann CM; Arblaster JM; Wigley TML; Tebaldi C. (2004). Combinations of
natural and anthropogenic forcings in twentieth-century climate. J Clim, 17- 3721—3727. 192279
Meers E> Vangronsveld J; Tack FMG; Vandecasteele B; Ruttens A. (2007). Potential of five willow species (Salix
spp.) for phytoextraction of heavy metals. Environ Exp Bot, 60- 57"68. 155977
Melnikov Si Carroll Ji Gorshkov Ai Vlasov Si Dahle S. (2003). Snow and ice concentrations of selected persistent
organic pollutants in the Ob-Yenisey River watershed. Sci Total Environ, 306- 27"37. 156753
Memon ARi Schroder P. (2009). Implications of metal accumulation mechanisms to phytoremediation. Environ
Sci Pollut Res Int, 16: 162-175. 190442
Menon Si Del Genio ADi Kaufman Yi Bennartz Ri Koch Di Loeb Ni Orlikowski D. (2008). Analyzing signatures
of aerosol cloud interactions from satellite retrievals and the GISS GCM to constrain the aerosol indirect
effect. J Geophys Res, 113: D14S22. 190534
Mercado LMi Bellouin Ni Sitch Si Boucher Oi Huntingford Ci Wild Mi Cox PM. (2009). Impact of changes in
diffuse radiation on the global land carbon sink. Nature, 458: 1014-U1087. 190444
Michalsky Ji Schlemmer Ji Berkheiser Wi. (2001). Multiyear measurements of aerosol optical depth in the
Atmospheric Radiation Measurement and Quantitative Links program. J Geophys Res, 106: 12099"
12108. 190537
Middleton WEK. (1952). Vision through the atmosphere. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
016324
Mie G. (1908). Beitrage zur Optik triiber Medien, speziell kolloidaler Metallosungen. , 330: 377-445. 155983
Miller RLi Schmidt GAi Shindell DT. (2005). Forced annular variations in the 20th century Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report models. J Geophys Res, 111: D18101. 192258
Millhollen AGi Gustin MSi Obrist D. (2006). Foliar mercury accumulation and exchange for three tree species.
Environ Sci Technol, 40: 6001-6006. 190447
Min Qi Harrison LC. (1996). Cloud properties derived from surface MFRSR measurements and comparison with
GEOS results at the ARM SGP site. Geophys Res Lett, 23: 1641- 1644. 190538
Minnis Pi Harrison EFi Stowe LLi Gibson GGi Denn FMi Doelling DRi Smith WL Jr. (1993). Radiative Climate
Forcing by the Mount Pinatubo Eruption. , 259: 1411-1415. 190539
Mischenko Mi Cairns Bi Kopp G> Schueler CFi Fafaul BAi Hansen JEi et al. (2007). Accurate monitoring of
terrestrial aerosols and total solar irradiance. , 88: 677-691. 190543
Mishchenko ML Geogdzhayev IV. (2007). Satellite remote sensing reveals regional tropospheric aerosol trends. ,
15: 7423-7438. 190545
Mishchenko ML Geogdzhayev IV; Cairns Bi Rossow WBi Lacis AA. (1999). Aerosol retrievals over the ocean by
use of channels 1 and 2 AVHRR data: sensitivity analysis and preliminary results. Appl Opt, 38: 7325"
7341. 190541
Mishchenko ML Geogdzhayev IV; Rossow WBi Cairns Bi Carlson BE; Lacis AA; Liu L; Travis LD. (2007). Long-
term satellite record reveals likely recent aerosol trend. , 315: 1543. 190542
Mitchell JM Jr. (1971). The effect of atmospheric aerosols on climate with special reference to temperature near
the Earth's surface. , 10: 703-714. 190546
Molina LT; Madronich S; Gaffney JS; Singh HB. (2008). Overview of MILAGRO/INTEX-B Campaign.
International Global Atmospheric Chemistry (Newsletter). Seattle,
WA.http ://www .igac.noaa.gov/newsletter/igac38/Apr_2008_IGAC_38 .pdf. 192019
Moody E; King M; Platnick S; Schaaf C; Gao F. (2005). Spatially complete global spectral surface albedos: value-
added datasets derived from Terra MODIS land products. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 43: 144-158.
190548
Moosmiiller H; Arnott WP; Rogers CF; Chow JC; Frazier CA; Sherman LE; Dietrich DL. (1998). Photoacoustic
and filter measurements related to aerosol light-absorption during the nothern front range air quality
study (Colorado 1996/1997). J Geophys Res, 103: 28149-28157. 192073
Moropoulou A; Bisbikou K; Torfs K; Van Grieken R; Zezza FJ Macri F. (1998). Origin and growth of weathering
crusts on ancient marbles in industrial atmosphere. Atmos Environ, 32: 967-982. 040485
Moses CA; Smith BJ. (1994). Limestone weathering in the supratidal zone: an example from Mallorca. : . 156785
Mosley-Thompson E; Mashiotta TA; Thompson LG. (2003). High resolution ice core records of Late Holocene
volcanism: Current and future contributions from the Greenland PARCA cores. In Volcanism and the
Earth's Atmosphere (pp. 153—164). Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union. 192255
Mouillot F; Narasimha A; Balkanski Y; Lamarque J-F. (2006). Global carbon emissions from biomass burning in
the 20th century. Geophys Res Lett, 33: L01801. 190549
July 2009
9-291
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Muir DCG; Omelchenko A; Grift NP; Savoie DA; Lockhart WL; Wilkinson P; Brunskill GJ. (1996). Spatial
trends and historical deposition of polychlorinated biphenyls in Canadian midlatitude and arctic lake
sediments. Environ Sci Technol, 30- 3609-3617. 155991
Murayama T, et al. (2001). Ground-based network observation of Asian dust events of April 1998 in East Asia. J
Geophys Res, 106: 18345-18360. 155992
Murdoch JC; Thayer MA. (1988). Hedonic price estimation of variable urban air quality. J Environ Econ
Manage, 15: 143-146. 156788
Malkonen Ei Derome J; Fritze H; Helmisaari H"S; Kukkola Mi Kyto Mi Saarsalmi Ai Salemaa M. (1999).
Compensatory fertilization of Scots pine stands polluted by heavy metals. , 55: 239—268. 155961
Naidoo Gi Chirkoot D. (2004). The effects of coal dust on photosynthetic performance of the mangrove,
Avicennia marina in Richards Bay, South Africa. , 127: 359-366. 190449
Nakajima Ti Higurashi Ai Kawamoto Ki Penner JE. (2001). A possible correlation between satellite-derived
cloud and aerosol microphysical parameters. Geophys Res Lett, 28: 1171-1174. 190552
Nakamura Ki Nakawo Mi Ageta Yi Goto-Azuma Ki Kamiyam K. (2000). Post-depositional loss of nitrate in
surface snow layers of the Antarctic ice sheet. , 17: 11-16. 156792
Nash TH III. (1975). Influence of effluents from a zinc factory on lichens. Ecol Monogr, 45: 183-198. 016763
National Research Council. (2001). Climate change science: an analysis of some key questions. 053303
National Research Council. (2005). Radiative forcing of climate change: expanding the concept and addressing
uncertainties. 057409
Nazaroff WWi Cass GR. (1991). Protecting museum collections from soiling due to the deposition of airborne
particles. Atmos Environ, 25: 841-852. 044577
NCDENR. (2007). Technical Analyses Supporting Regional Haze State Implementation Plan 156798
NESCAUM. (0). Regional Aerosol Intensive Network (RAIN) Preliminary Data Analysis 156802
Nguyen HL; Leermakers MJ Elskens Mi De Ridder Fi Doan THi Baeyens W. (2005). Correlations, partitioning
and bioaccumulation of heavy metals between different compartments of Lake Balaton. Sci Total
Environ, 341: 211-226. 155997
Nicholson Li Benn DI. (2006). Calculating ice melt beneath a debris layer using meteorological data. , 52: 463"
470. 156806
Nieminen Ti Derome Ji Helmisaari H"S. (1999). Interactions between precipitation and Scots pine canopies
along a heavy-metal pollution gradient. Environ Pollut, 106: 129—137. 155998
Nogueira MAi Magalhaes GCi Cardoso EJBN. (2004). Manganese toxicity in mycorrhizal and phosphorus-
fertilized soybean plants. , 27: 141-156. 190460
Norris Ji Wild M. (2007). Trends in aerosol radiative effects over Europe inferred from observed cloud cover,
solar "dimming", and solar "brightening". J Geophys Res, 112: D08214. 190555
Notten MJMi Oosthoek AJPi Rozema Ji Aerts R. (2005). Heavy metal concentrations in a soil-plant-snail food
chain along a terrestrial soil pollution gradient. Environ Pollut, 138: 178-190. 190461
Novakov Ti Ramanathan Vi Hansen JEi Kirchstetter TWi Sato Mi Sinton JEi Sathaye JA. (2003). Large
historical changes of fossil-fuel black carbon aerosols. Geophys Res Lett, 30. 048398
O'Dowd Ci McFiggans Gi Creasey DJi Pirjola Li Hoell Ci Smith MHi Allan BJi Plane JMCi Heard DEi Lee JDi
Pilling MJi Kulmala M. (1999). On the photochemical production of new particles in the coastal boundary
layer. Geophys Res Lett, 26: 1707-1710. 090414
O'Neill NT; Eck TF; Smirnov A; Holben BN; Thulasiraman S. (2003). Spectral discrimination of coarse and fine
mode optical depth. J Geophys Res, 108: 4559. 180187
Odum EP. (1985). Trends expected in stressed ecosystems. , 35: 419-422. 039482
Odum EP. (1993). Major ecosystem types of the world. In Odum, E. P. (Ed.),Ecology and our endangered life-
support systemsSunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc. 076742
Oehme M; Biseth A; Schlabach M; Wiig O. (1995). Concentrations of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins,
dibenzofurans and non-ortho substituted biphenyls in polar bear milk from Svalbard (Norway). Environ
Pollut, 90: 401-407. 011267
Oehme M; Haugen J-E; Schlabach M. (1996). Seasonal changes and relation between levels of organochlorines
in Arctic ambient air: First results from an all-round-year monitoring program at Ny-Alesund, Norway.
Environ Sci Technol, 30: 2294-2304. 156001
Ohyama K; Angermann J; Dunlap DY; Matsumura F. (2004). Distribution of polychlorinated biphenyls and
chlorinated pesticide residues in trout in the Sierra Nevada. J Environ Qual, 33: 1752-1764. 190462
Oliveira A; Pampulha ME. (2006). Effects of long-term heavy metal contamination on soil microbial
characteristics. , 102: 157-161. 156827
Ormrod DP. (1984). Impact of trace element pollution on plants. In Treshow, M. (Ed.),Air pollution and plant
lifeChichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 046892
July 2009
9-292
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Otnyukova T. (2007). Epiphytic lichen growth abnormalities and element concentrations as early indicators of
forest decline. , 146: 359-365. 156009
Ouimette JR.; Flagan RC. (1982). The extinction coefficient of multicomponent aerosols. Atmos Environ, 16:
2405-2420. 025047
Ozdilek HG; Mathisen PP; Pellegrino D. (2007). Distribution of heavy metals in vegetation surrounding the
Blackstone River, USA: Considerations regarding sediment contamination and long term metals
transport in freshwater riverine ecosystems. J Environ Biol, 28: 493-502. 156010
Pacheco AMG; Freitas MC. (2004). Are lower epiphytes really that better than higher plants for indicating
airborne contaminants? An insight into the elemental contents of lichen thalli and tree bark by INAA.
Journal of Radioanal Chem, 259: 27"33. 156011
Padmavathiamma PK; Li LY. (2007). Phytoremediation technology: Hyper-accumulation metals in plants. , 184:
105-126. 190465
Palmer AS; Morgan VI; Curran MAJ; van Ommen TD; Mayewski PA. (2002). Antarctic volcanic flux ratios from
Law Dome ice cores. Ann Glaciol, 35: 329-332. 192319
Park RJ; Jacob DJ; Kumar N> Yantosca RM. (2006). Regional visibility statistics in the United States: Natural
and transboundary pollution influences, and implications for the regional haze rule. Atmos Environ, 40:
5405-5423. 190469
Parrish ZD; White JC; Isleyen M; Gent MPN; Iannucci-Berger W; Eitzer BD; Kelsey JW; Mattina MI. (2006).
Accumulation of weathered polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by plant and earthworm species.
Chemosphere, 64: 609-618. 156014
Patadia F; Gupta P; Christopher SA. (2008). First observational estimates of global clear-sky shortwave aerosol
direct radiative effect over land. J Geophys Res, 35: L04810. 190558
Patra M; Bhowmik N> Bandopadhyay B; Sharma A. (2004). Comparison of mercury, lead and arsenic with
respect to genotoxic effects on plant systems and the development of genetic tolerance. Environ Exp Bot,
52: 199-223. 081976
Pennanen T; Frostegard A; Fritze H; Baath E. (1996). Phospholipid fatty acid composition and heavy metal
tolerance of soil microbial communities along two heavy metal-polluted gradients in coniferous forests.
Appl Environ Microbiol, 62: 420-428. 156016
Penner J; Quaas J; Storelvmo T; Takemura T; Boucher O; Guo H; et al. (2006). Model intercomparison of
indirect aerosol effects. , 6: 3391-3405. 190564
Penner JE. (2003). Comment on "Control of fossil-fuel particulate black carbon and organic matter, possibly the
most effective method of slowing global warming. J Geophys Res, 108: 4771. 156851
Penner JE; Dickinson RE; O'Neill CA. (1992). Effects of aerosol from biomass burning on the global radiation
budget. , 256: 1432-1433. 045825
Penner JE; Eddleman H; Novakov T. (1993). Towards the development of a global inventory for black carbon
emissions. Atmos Environ, 27: 1277-1295. 045457
Penner JE; Zhang SY; Chin M; Chuang CC; Feichter J; Geogdzhayev IV; et al. (2002). A comparison of model"
and satellite derived aerosol optical depth and reflectivity. J Trace Elem Med Biol, 59: 441-460. 190562
Pennisi E. (2004). The secret life of fungi. , 304: 1620-1622. 156018
Perlwitz J; Graf HF. (2001). Trosposphere-stratosphere dynamic coupling under strong and weak polar vortex
conditions . Geophys Res Lett, 28: 271-274. 192271
Perlwitz J; Harnik N. (2003). Observational evidence of a stratospheric influence on the troposphere by
planetary wave reflection. J Clim, 16: 3011-3026. 192264
Peters AJ; Gregor DJ; Teixeira CF; Jones NP; Spencer C. (1995). The recent depositional trend of polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons and elemental carbon to the Agassiz Ice cap, Ellesmere Island, Canada. Sci Total
Environ, 160/161: 167-179. 156856
Pfirman SL; Kogeler JW; Rigor I. (1997). Potential for rapid transport of contaminants from the Kara Sea. Sci
Total Environ, 202: 111-122. 156864
Pincus R; Klein SA. (2000). Unresolved spatial variability and microphysical process rates in large-scale models.
J Geophys Res, 105: 27059-27065. 190565
Pinker R; Zhang B; Dutton E. (2005). Do satellites detect trends in surface solar radiation?. , 308: 850-854.
190569
Piol MN; Lopez AG; Mino LA; Dos Santos Afonso M; Verrengia Guerrero NR. (2006). The impact of particle-
bound cadmium on bioavailability and bioaccumulation: A pragmatic approach. Environ Sci Technol, 40:
6341-6347. 156028
Pitchford M; Green M; Kuhns H; Tombach I; Malm W', Scruggs M; Farber R; Mirabella V; White WH; McDade
C. (1999). Project MOHAVE Final Report. 156873
July 2009
9-293
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Pitchford M> Maim W; Schichtel B; Kumar Ni Lowenthal D; Hand J. (2007). Revised algorithm for estimating
light extinction from IMPROVE particle speciation data. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 57' 1326-36. 098066
Pitchford ML; Green MC; Morris R; Emery C; Sakata R; Swab C', Mairose PT. (2008). Columbia River Gorge Air
Quality Study- Science Summary Report. Southwest Clean Air Agency. Vancouver, WA. 180159
Pitchford ML; Malm WC. (1994). Development and applications of a standard visual index. Atmos Environ, 28-
1049-1054. 044922
Pitchford ML; Polkowsky BV; McGown MR; Malm WC; Molenar JV; Mauch L. (1990). Percent change in
extinction coefficient- A proposed approach for federal visibility protection strategy. • . 156871
Pitchford ML; Schichtel BA; Gebhart KA; Barna MG; Malm WC; Tombach IH; Knipping EM. (2005).
Reconciliation and Interpretation of the Big Bend National Park Light Extinction Source Apportionment-
Results from the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational Study- Part II. J Air Waste
Manag Assoc, 55: 1726-1732. 156874
Prasad MNV; De Oliveira Freitas HM. (2003). Metal hyperaccumulation in plants - Biodiversity prospecting for.
Electron J Biotechnol, 6: 110-146. 156885
Prata A; Rose W', Self S; O'Brien D. (2003). Global, long-term sulphur dioxide measurements from TOVS data: a
new tool for studying explosive volcanism and climate. In Volcanism and the Earth's Atmosphere (pp.
75-92). Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union. 192235
Preston CM; Schmidt MWI. (2006). Black (pyrogenic) carbon: a synthesis of current knowledge and
uncertainties with special consideration of boreal regions. , 3: 397-420. 156030
Procopio AS; Artaxo P; Kaufman YJ; Remer LA; Schafer JA; Holben BN. (2004). Multiyear analysis of
Amazonian biomass burning smoke radiative forcing of climate. J Geophys Res, 31: L03108. 190571
Prospero JM. (1996). Saharan dust transport over the North Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean: an overview. In
Guerzoni S; Chester R (Ed.),The Impact of Desert Dust Across the Mediterranean (pp. 133—152). The
Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 156889
Pryor SC. (1996). Assessing public perception of visibility for standard setting exercises. Atmos Environ, 30:
2705-2716. 056598
Pryor SC; Binkowski FS. (2004). An analysis of the time scales associated with aerosol processes during dry
deposition. Aerosol Sci Technol, 38: 1091-1098. 116805
Putaud J-P; Raes F; Van Dengenen R; Bruggemann E; Facchini M"C; Decesari S; Fuzzi S; Gehrig R; Huglin C;
Laj P; Lorbeer G; Maenhaut W', Mihalopoulos N; Muller K; Querol X; Rodriguez S; Schneider J; Spindler
G; ten Brink H; Torseth K; Wiedensohler A. (2004). A European aerosol phenomenology--2' chemical
characteristics of particulate matter at kerbside, urban, rural and background sites in Europe. Atmos
Environ, 38: 2579-2595. 055545
Qian Y; Wang W; Leung L; Kaiser D. (2007). Variability of solar radiation under cloud-free skies in China: The
role of aerosols. Geophys Res Lett, 34: L12804. 190572
Quaas J; Boucher O. (2005). Constraining the first aerosol indirect radiative forcing in the LMDZ GCM using
POLDER and MODIS satellite data. Geophys Res Lett, 32: L17814. 190573
Quaas J; Boucher O; Bellouin N; Kinne S. (2008). Satellite- based estimate of the direct and indirect aerosol
climate forcing. J Geophys Res, 113: D05204. 190916
Quaas J; Boucher O; Lohmann U. (2006). Constraining the total aerosol indirect effect in the LMDZ GCM and
ECHAM4 GCMs using MODIS satellite data. , 5: 9669-9690. 190915
Quinn PK; Anderson T; Bates T; Dlugi R; Heintzenberg J; Von Hoyningen-Huene W; Kumula M; Russel P;
Swietlicki E. (1996). Closure in tropospheric aerosol-climate research : A review and future needs for
addressing aerosol direct shortwave radiative forcing. , 69: 547-577. 192021
Quinn PK; Bates TS. (2003). North American, Asian, and Indian haze: similar regional impacts on climate?.
Geophys Res Lett, 30. 049189
Quinn PK; Bates TS; Baynard T; Clarke AD; Onasch TB; Wang W', Rood MJ; Andrews E; Allan J; Carrico CM;
Coffman D; Worsnop D. (2005). Impact of particulate organic matter on the relative humidity dependence
of light scattering: A simplified parameterization. Geophys Res Lett, 32: 1-4. 156033
Quinn PK; Coffman D; Kapustin V; Bates TS; Covert DS. (1998). Aerosol optical properties in the marine
boundary layer during ACE 1 and the underlying chemical and physical aerosol properties. J Geophys
Res, 103: 16547-16563. 190918
Quinn PK; Coffman DJ; Bates TS; Welton EJ; Covert DS; Miller TL; et al. (2004). Aerosol optical properties
measured aboard the Ronald H. Brown during ACE "Asia as a function of aerosol chemical composition
and source region. J Geophys Res, 109: 109. 190937
Radke LF; Coakley JA; King MD. (1989). Direct and remote sensing observations of the effects of ships on
clouds. , 246: 1146-1149. 156034
July 2009
9-294
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Rajapaksha R; MT"K; Baath E. (2004). Metal toxicity affects fungal and bacterial activities in soil differently.
Appl Environ Microbiol, 5- 2966 — 2973. 156035
Ramachandran S> Ramaswamy V; Stenchikov GL; Robock A. (2000). Radiative impact of the Mount Pinatubo
volcanic eruption- Lower stratospheric response. J Geophys Res, 105- 24409-24429. 192050
Ramanathan V; Crutzen P. (2003). Atmospheric Brown "Clouds". Atmos Environ, 37- 4033-4035. 190198
Ramanathan V; Crutzen P; Lelieveld J; et al. (2001). Indian Ocean Experiment- An integrated analysis of the
climate forcing and effects of the great Indo-Asian haze. J Geophys Res, 106- 28371-38398. 190196
Ramanathan V; Crutzen PJ; Kiehl JT; Rosenfeld D. (2001). Aerosols, climate and the hydrological cycle. , 294-
2119-2124. 042681
Ramanathan V; et al. (2005). Atmospheric brown clouds' Impact on South Asian climate and hydrologic cycle. ,
102: 5326-5333. 190199
Ramaswamy V; Boucher Oi Haigh J; Hauglustaine D; Haywood J; Myhre Gi Nakajima Ti Shi G> Solomon Si
Betts RE. (2001). Radiative Forcing of Climate Change: PNNL"SA"39648. New York: Cambridge
University Press. 156899
Ramaswamy Vi Ramachandran Si Stenchikov Gi Robock A. (2006). A model study of the effect of Pinatubo
volcanic aerosols on the stratospheric temperatures+. In Kiehl JTi Ramanathan V (Ed.),Frontiers of
climate modeling (pp. 152—178). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 192273
Ramaswamy Vi Schwarzkopf MDi Randel WJi Santer BDi Soden BJi Stenchikov GL. (2006). Anthropogenic and
natural influences in the evolution of lower stratospheric cooling. , 311: 1138-1141. 192284
Ramos Li Hernandez LMi Gonzalez MJ. (1994). Sequential fractionation of copper, lead, cadmium and zinc in
soils from or near Donana National Park. J Environ Qual, 23: 50-57. 046736
Ramsey JM. (1966). Concentrations of carbon monoxide at traffic intersections in Dayton, Ohio. Arch Environ
Occup Health, 13: 44-46. 013946
Randall CEi Bevilacqua RMi Lumpe JDi Hoppel KW. (2001). Validation of POAM III aerosols: Comparison to
SAGE II and HALOE. J Geophys Res, 106: 27525-27536. 192268
Randall Di Khairoutdinov Mi Arakawa Ai Grabowski W. (2003). Breaking the cloud parameterization deadlock.
, 84: 1547-1564. 190201
Randerson JTi Liu Hi Flanner MGi Chambers SDi Jin Yi Hess PGi Pfister Gi Mack MCi Treseder KKi Welp LRi
Chapin FSi Harden JWi Goulden MLi Lyons Ei Neff JCi Schuur EAGi Zender CS. (2006). The impact of
boreal forest fire on climate warming. , 314: 1130-1132. 156038
Rapport DJi Whitford WG. (1999). How ecosystems respond to stress: common properties of arid and aquatic
systems. , 49: 193-203. 004595
Ray Pi Reddy UG; Lapeyrie Fi Adholeya A. (2005). Effect of coal ash on growth and metal uptake by some
selected ectomycorrhizal fungi in vitro. , T- 199-216. 190473
Read WG; Froidevaux L; Waters JW. (1993). Microwave limb sounder measurement of stratospheric S02 from
the Mt. Pinatubo Volcano. Geophys Res Lett, 20: 1299-1302. 192031
Reddy Mi Boucher Oi Balkanski Yi Schulz M. (2005). Aerosol optical depths and direct radiative perturbations
by species and source type. Geophys Res Lett, 32: L12803. 190208
Reddy Mi Boucher Oi Bellouin Ni Schulz Mi Balkanski Yi Dufresne Ji Pham M. (2005). Estimates of multi-
component aerosol optical depth and direct radiative perturbation in the LMDZT general circulation
model. J Geophys Res, 110: D10S16. 190207
Reddy MSi Boucher O. (2007). Climate impact of black carbon emitted from energy consumption in the world's
regions. Geophys Res Lett, 34: 1802. 156042
Regoli Fi Gorbi Si Fattorini Di Tedesco Si Notti Ai Machella Ni Bocchetti R; Benedetti Mi Piva F. (2006). Use of
the land snail Helix aspersa sentinel organism for monitoring ecotoxicologic effects of urban pollution: An
integrated approach. , 114: 63"69. 156046
Reid J. (2008). An overview of UAE2 flight operations: Observations of summertime atmospheric
thermodynamic and aerosol profiles of the southern Arabian Gulf. J Geophys Res, 113: D14213. 190214
Reid Ji Kinney J; Wesphal D; et al. (2003). Analysis of measurements of Saharan dust by airborne and ground-
based remote sensing methods during the Puerto Rico Dust Experiment (PRIDE). J Geophys Res, 108:
8586. 190213
Reinfelder JR; Fisher NS; Luoma SN; Nichols JW; Wang W"X. (1998). Trace element trophic transfer in aquatic
organisms: A critique of the kinetic model approach. Sci Total Environ, 219: 117-135. 156047
Reisinger LM. (1990). Analysis of airborne particles sampled in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Water Air
Soil Pollut, 50: 149-162. 046737
Remer L; et al. (2008). An emerging aerosol climatology from the MODIS satellite sensors. J Geophys Res, 113:
D14S01.190224
July 2009
9-295
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Remer L; Gassoi Hegg D; Kaufman Y> Holben B. (1997). Urban/industrial aerosol- ground based sun/sky
radiometer and airborne in situ measurements. J Geophys Res, 102- 16849-16859. 190216
Remer L; Kaufman Y. (2006). Aerosol direct radiative effect at the top of the atmosphere over cloud free ocean
derived from four years of MODIS data. , 6: 237-253. 190222
Remer L; Kaufman Y> Tanre D; Mattoo Si Chu Di Martins Ji Li Ri Ichoku Ci Levy Ri Kleidman Ri Eck Ti
Vermote Ei Holben B. (2005). The MODIS aerosol algorithm, products and validation. J Trace Elem Med
Biol, 62: 947-973. 190221
Remer Li Tanre Di Kaufman Yi Ichoku Ci Mattoo Si Levy Ri Chu Di Holben Bi Dubovik Oi Smirnov Ai Martins
Ji Li Ri Ahman Z. (2002). Validation of MODIS aerosol retrieval over ocean. Geophys Res Lett, 29: 8008.
190218
Richards LW; Dye TS; Arthur M; Byars MS. (1996). Analysis of ASOS Data for Visibility Purposes, Final Report
. Systems Applications International, Inc.. San Rafael, CA. STI-996231-1610-FR. 190476
Rind D; Perlwitz J; Lonergan P. (2005). AO/NAO response to climate change: 1. Respective influences of
stratospheric and tropospheric climate changes. J Geophys Res, 110: D12107. 192261
Rissler J; Swietlicki E; Zhou J; Roberts G; Andreae MO; Gatti LV; Artaxo P. (2004). Physical properties of the
sub-micrometer aerosol over the Amazon rain forest during the wet-todry season transition—comparison
of modeled and measured CCN concentrations. , 4- 2119-2143. 190225
Roberts DL; Jones A. (2004). Climate sensitivity to black carbon aerosol from fossil fuel combustion. J Geophys
Res, 109: 6202. 156052
Roberts ES; Richards JH; Jaskot R; Dreher KL. (2003). Oxidative stress mediates air pollution particle-induced
acute lung injury and molecular pathology. Inhal Toxicol, 15: 1327-1346. 156051
Robinson A; Donahue N; Shrivastava M; Weitkamp E; Sage A; Grieshop A; Lane T; Pierce J; Pandis S. (2007).
Rethinking organic aerosols: Semivolatile emissions and photochemical aging. , 315: 1259. 191975
Roderick ML; Farquhar GD. (2002). The cause of decreased pan evaporation over the past 50 years. , 298: 1410"
1411. 042788
Roeckner E; Stier P; Feichter J; KLoster S; Esch M; Fischer-Bruns L. (2006). Impact of carbonaceous aerosol
emissions on regional climate change. , 27: 553-571. 156920
Romic M; Romic D. (2003). Heavy metals distribution in agricultural topsoils in urban area. , 43: 795-805.
156055
Rood MJ; Covert DS; Larson TV. (1987). Hygroscopic properties of atmospheric aerosol in Riverside, California.
Tellus B Chem Phys Meteorol, 39B: 383-397. 046397
Rosenfeld D. (2000). Suppression of rain and snow by urban and industrial air pollution. , 287: 1793-1796.
002234
Rosenfeld D. (2006). Aerosols, clouds, and climate. , 312: 1. 190233
Rosenfeld D; Dai J; Yu X; Yao Z; Xu X; Yang X; Du C. (2007). Inverse relations between amounts of air pollution
and orographic precipitation. , 315: 1396-1398. 156057
Rosenfeld D; Givati A. (2006). Evidence of orographic precipitation suppression by air pollution-induced aerosols
in the western United States. , 45: 893-911. 156924
Rosenfeld D; Lansky I. (1998). Satellite-based insights into precipitation formation processes in continental and
maritime convective clouds. , 79: 2457-2476. 190230
Ross DM; Malm WC; Loomis RJ. (1985). The psychological valuation of good visual air quality by national park
visitors. Presented at Presented at: 78th annual meeting of the Air Pollution Control Association; June;
Detroit, MI. Pittsburgh, PA: Air Pollution Control Association; paper no. 85-10.4. 044287
Ross DM; Malm WC; Loomis RJ. (1987). An examination of the relative importance of park attributes at several
national parks. In Bhardwaja, P. S. (Ed.),Visibility protection: research and policy aspects, an APCA
international specialty conferenceGrand Teton National Park, WY; Pittsburgh, PA: Air Pollution Control
Association. 037420
Rosselli W; Keller C; Boschi K. (2003). Phytoextraction capacity of trees growing on a metal contaminated soil.
Plant Soil, 256: 265-272. 156058
Roth CM; Goss K-U; Schwarzenbach RP. (2004). Sorption of diverse organic vapors to snow. Environ Sci
Technol, 38: 4078-4084. 056431
Rotton J; Barry T; Milligan M; Fitzpatrick M. (1979). The air pollution experience and interpersonal aggression.
, 9: 397-412. 190478
Rotton J; Frey J. (1982). Atmospheric conditions, seasonal trends, and psychiatric emergencies. In Replications
and Extensions (pp. Unknown). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 190477
Rozanov EV; Schlesinger ME; Andronova NG; Yang F; Malyshev SL; Zubov VA; Egorova TA; Li B. (2002).
Climate/chemistry effects of the Pinatubo volcanic eruption simulated by the UIUC
stratosphere/troposphere GCM with interactive photochemistry. J Geophys Res, 107: 4594. 192247
July 2009
9-296
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Rozanov EV; Schlesinger ME; Egorova TA; Li B; Andronova N> Zubov VA. (2004). Atmospheric response to the
observed increase of solar UV radiation from solar minimum to solar maximum simulated by the
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign climate-chemistry model . J Geophys Res, 109- D01110.
192245
Ruckstuhl C> et al. (2008). Aerosol and cloud effects on solar brightening and recent rapid warming. Geophys
Res Lett, 35: L12708. 190356
Russell P; Kinne S> Bergstrom R. (1997). Aerosol climate effects: local radiative forcing and column closure
experiments. J Geophys Res, 102: 9397-9407. 190359
Russell P; Livingston J; Hignett P; Kinne S> Wong J; Chien A; Bergstrom R; Durkee P; Hobbs P. (1999). Aerosol-
induced radiative flux changes off the United States mid"Atlantic coast: comparison of values calculated
from sun photometer and in situ data with those measured by airborne pyranometer. J Geophys Res,
104: 2289-2307. 190363
Rusu A-M; Jones GC; Chimonides PDJ; Purvis OW. (2006). Biomonitoring using the lichen Hypogymnia
physodes and bark samples near Zlatna, Romania immediately following closure of a copper ore-
processing plant. Environ Pollut, 143: 81-88. 156062
Ryan PA; Lowenthal D; Kumar N. (2005). Improved light extinction reconstruction in interagency monitoring of
protected visual environments. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 55: 1751-1759. 156934
Sabbioni C; Ghedini N; Bonazza A. (2003). Organic anions in damage layers on monuments and buildings.
Atmos Environ, 37: 1261-1269. 049282
Sabin LD; Lim JH; Stolzenbach KD; Schiff KC. (2005). Contribution of trace metals from atmospheric deposition
to stormwater runoff in a small impervious urban catchment. Water Res, 39: 3929-3937. 088300
Salemaa M; Derome J; Helmisaari HS; Nieminen T; Vanha-Majamaa I. (2004). Element accumulation in boreal
bryophytes, lichens and vascular plants exposed to heavy metal and sulfur deposition in Finland. Sci
Total Environ, 324: 141-160. 156069
Samuels HJ; Twiss SJ Wong EW. (1973). Visibility, light scattering and mass concentration of particulate
matter: report of the California Tri-City Aerosol Sampling Project. 070601
Sanderson EG; Farant JP. (2004). Indoor and outdoor polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in residences
surrounding a Soderberg aluminum smelter in Canada. Environ Sci Technol, 38: 5350-5356. 156942
Sato M; Hansen J; Koch D; Lucis A; Ruedy R; Dubovik O; Holben B; Chin M; Novakov T. (2003). Global
atmospheric black carbon inferred from AAEONET. Presented at Proceedings of the National Academy of
Science. 156947
Sato M; Hansen JE; McCormick MP; Pollack JB. (1993). Stratospheric aerosol optical depths, 1850-1990. J
Geophys Res, 98: 22987-22994. 192046
Sauve S. (2001). Speciation of metals in soils. Presented at , Pensacola, FL. 156948
Saxena P; Hildemann LM; McMurry PH; Seinfeld JH. (1995). Organics alter hygroscopic behavior of
atmospheric particles. J Geophys Res, 100: 18,755-18,770. 077273
Schichtel BA; Gebhart K; Barna MG; Malm WC; Green MC. (2004). Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility
Observational (BRAVO) Study Results: Air Quality Data and Source Attribution Analyses Results from
the National Park Service 179902
Schichtel BA; Gebhart KA; Malm WC; Barna MG; Pitchford ML; Knipping EM; Tombach IH. (2005).
Reconciliation and interpretation of big bend national park particulate sulfur source apportionment:
Results from the big bend regional aerosol and visibility observational study-part I. J Air Waste Manag
Assoc, 55: 1709-1725. 156957
Schichtel BA; Malm WC; Bench G; Fallon S; McDade CE; Chow JC; Watson JG. (2008). Fossil and
contemporary fine particulate carbon fractions at 12 rural and urban sites in the United States. J
Geophys Res, 113: . 156958
Schiff K; Bay S; Stransky C. (2002). Characterization of stormwater toxicants from an urban watershed to
freshwater and marine organisms. , 4- 215-227. 156959
Schilling JS; Lehman ME. (2002). Bioindication of atmospheric heavy metal deposition in the Southeastern US
using the moss Thuidium delicatulum. Atmos Environ, 36: 1611-1618. 113075
Schmid B; et al. (2000). Clearsky closure studies of lower tropospheric aerosol and water vapor during ACE"2
using airborne sunphotometer, airborne in situ, space-borne, and ground-based measurements. , 52: 568"
593. 190369
Schmid B; Ferrare R; Flynn C; et al. (2006). How well do stateof- the-art techniques measuring the vertical
profile of tropospheric aerosol extinction compare?. J Geophys Res, 111: 0. 190372
Schmidt GA; et al. (2006). Present-day atmospheric simulations using GISS Model E: Comparison to in situ,
satellite and reanalysis data. J Clim, 19: 153-192. 190373
July 2009
9-297
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Schoeberl MR; Douglass AR; Zhu Z; Pawson S. (2003). A comparison of the lower stratospheric age spectra
derived from a general circulation model and two data assimilation systems. J Geophys Res, 108D3.
057262
Schroeder WHJ Munthe J. (1998). Atmospheric mercury -- an overview. Atmos Environ, 32- 809-822. 014559
Schulz Mi Textor Ci Kinne Si et al. (2006). Radiative forcing by aerosols as derived from the AeroCom present-
day and preindustrial simulations. , 6- 5225-5246. 190381
Schwartz Ji Zanobetti Ai Bateson TFi Schwartz Ji Sarnat JAi Coull BAi Wilson WE. (2007). Effects of exposure
measurement error on particle matter epidemiology- a simulation using data from a panel study in
Baltimore, MD. , 17: S2. 188938
Seifert Mi Anke Si Holzinger Si Jaritz Mi Arnhold Wi Anke M. (1999). Cadmium and strontium content of mice,
shrews, and some invertebrates. , 17: 357-365. 190480
Seigneur Ci Johnson CDi Latimer DAi Bergstrom RWi Hogo H. (1984). Users manual for the Plume Visibility
Model (PLUVUE II). Final report 23 Feb-29 Aug 83 156965
Seinfeld JHi Carmichael GRi Arimoto Ri et al. (2004). ACEAsia: Regional climatic and atmospheric chemical
effects of Asian dust and pollution. , 85: 367-380. 190388
Sekiguchi Mi Nakajima Ti Suzuki Ki et al. (2003). A study of the direct and indirect effects of aerosols using
global satellite data sets of aerosol and cloud parameters. J Geophys Res, 108 D22: 4699. 190385
Shakya Ki Chettri MKi Sawidis T. (2008). Impact of heavy metals (copper, zinc, and lead) on the chlorophyll
content of some mosses. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol, 54: 412-421. 156081
Shan XQi Wang ZW; Wang WS; Zhang SZ; Wen B. (2003). Labile rhizosphere soil solution fraction for prediction
of bioavailability of heavy metals and rare earth elements to plants. Anal Bioanal Chem, 375: 400-407.
156972
Sharifi MR; Gibson AC; Rundel PW. (1999). Phenological and physiological responses of heavily dusted creosote
bush (Larrea tridentata) to summer irrigation in the Mojave Desert. , 14: 369—378. 156082
Sheesley RJ; Schauer JJ; Hemming JD; Barman MA; Geis SW; Tortorelli JJ. (2004). Toxicity of ambient
atmospheric particulate matter from the Lake Michigan (USA) airshed to aquatic organisms. Environ
Toxicol Chem, 23: 133-140. 156084
Shindell DT; Chin M; Dentener F; et al. (2008). A multi-model assessment of pollution transport to the Arctic. ,
8: 5353-5372. 190391
Shindell DT; Levy H; Schwarzkopf II MD; Horowitz LW; Lamarque JF; Faluvegi G. (2008). Multimodel
projections of climate change from short-lived emissions due to human activities. J Geophys Res, 113:
D11109.190393
Shindell DT; Schmidt GA; Mann ME; Faluvegi G. (2004). Dynamic winter climate response to large tropical
volcanic eruptions since 1600. J Geophys Res, 109: D05104. 192267
Shindell DT; Schmidt GA; Miller RL; Mann M. (2003). Volcanic and solar forcing of climate change during the
preindustrial era. J Clim, 16: 4094—4107. 192069
Shulz KG; Zondervan I; Gerringa LJA; Timmermans KR; Veldhuls MJW; Riebesell U. (2004). Effect of trace
metal availability on coccolithophorid calcification. , 430: 673-676. 156087
Singh HB; Brune WH; Crawford JH; Flocke F; Jacob DJ. (2008). Chemistry and Transport of Pollution over the
Gulf of Mexico and the Pacific: Spring 2006 INTEX-B Campaign Overview and First Results. , 0: 0.
190394
Sinyuk A; et al. (2007). Simultaneous retrieval of aerosol and surface properties from a combination of
AERONET and satellite data. , 107: 90-108. 190395
Skov H; Christensen JH; Goodsite ME; Heidam NZ; Jensen B; Wahlin P; Geernaert G. (2004). Fate of elemental
mercury in the Arctic during atmospheric mercury depletion episodes and the load of atmospheric
mercury to the Arctic. Environ Sci Technol, 38: 2373-2382. 190481
Sloane CS. (1983). Optical properties of aerosols--comparison of measurements with model calculations. Atmos
Environ, 17: 409-416. 025039
Sloane CS. (1984). Optical properties of aerosols of mixed composition. Atmos Environ, 18: 871-878. 025040
Sloane CS. (1986). Effect of composition on aerosol light scattering efficiencies. Atmos Environ, 20: 1025-1037.
045954
Sloane CS; Wolff GT. (1985). Prediction of ambient light scattering using a physical model responsive to relative
humidity: validation with measurements from Detroit. Atmos Environ, 19: 669-680. 045953
Smejkalova M; Mikanova O; Boruvka L. (2003). Effects of heavy metal concentrations on biological activity of
soil microorganisms. , 49: 321?326. 156987
Smirnov A; Holben B; Eck T; Dubovik O; Slutsker I. (2000). Cloud screening and quality control algorithms for
the AERONET database. , 73: 337-349. 190397
July 2009
9-298
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Smirnov A; Holben B; Eck T> Slutsker L Chatenet B; Pinker R. (2002). Diurnal variability of aerosol optical
depth observed at AERONET (Aerosol Robotic Network) sites. Geophys Res Lett, 29: 2115. 190398
Smirnov A; Holben B; Sakerin Si et al. (2006). Shipbased aerosol optical depth measurements in the Atlantic
Ocean, comparison with satellite retrievals and GOCART model. Geophys Res Lett, 33: L14817. 190400
Smith Jr WLi et al. (2005). EOS Terra aerosol and radiative flux validation: An overview of the Chesapeake
Lighthouse and aircraft measurements from satellites (CLAMS) experiment. J Trace Elem Med Biol, 62:
903-918. 190401
Smith WH. (1990). Forest nutrient cycling: toxic ions. In Air pollution and forests: interactions between air
contaminants and forest ecosystemsNew York, NY: Springer-Verlag. 046896
Smith WH. (1990). Forests as sinks for air contaminants: vegetative compartment. In Air pollution and forests:
interactions between air contaminants and forest ecosystems (pp. 147-180). New York, NY: Springer-
Verlag. 084015
Smith WH. (1991). Air pollution and forest damage. Chem Eng News, 6945: 30-43. 042566
Smolders Ei Degryse F. (2002). Fate and effect of zinc from tire debris in soil. Environ Sci Technol, 36: 3706—
3710. 156091
Soares CRFSi Siqueira JO. (2008). Mycorrhiza and phosphate protection of tropical grass species against heavy
metal toxicity in multi-contaminated soil. , 44: 833-841. 190482
Sokolik Ii Winker Di Bergametti Gi et al. (2001). Introduction to special section: outstanding problems in
quantifying the radiative impacts of mineral dust. J Geophys Res, 106: 18015-18027. 190404
Solomon PA; Hopke PK. (2008). A Special I ssue of JA&WMA Supporting Key Scientific and Policy-and Health-
Relevant Findings from EPA's Particulate Matter Supersites Program and Related Studies: An
Integration and Synthesis of Results. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 58: 137. 156997
Solomon S; Portmann RW! Garcia RR; Thomason LW; Poole LR; McCormick MP. (1996). The role of aerosol
variations in anthropogenic ozone depletion at northern midlatitudes. J Geophys Res, 101: 6713-6727.
192252
Sotiropoulou REP; Medina J; Nenes A. (2006). CCN predictions: is theory sufficient for assessments of the
indirect effect?. Geophys Res Lett, 33: L05816. 190406
Sotiropoulou REP; Nenes A; Adams PJ; Seinfeld JH. (2007). Cloud condensation nuclei prediction error from
application of Kohler theory: Importance for the aerosol indirect effect. J Geophys Res, 112: D12202.
190405
Spinhirne J; Palm S; Hart W; Hlavka D; Welton E. (2005). Cloud and Aerosol Measurements from the GLAS
Space Borne Lidar: initial results. Geophys Res Lett, 32: L22S03. 190410
Spracklen DV; Logan JA; Mickley LJ; Park RJ; Yevich R; Westerling AL; Jaffe DA. (2007). Wildfires drive
interannual variability of organic carbon aerosol in the western U.S. in summer. Geophys Res Lett, 34:
L16816. 190485
Squires P. (1958). The microstructure and colloidal stability of warm clouds: Part I - the relation between
structure and stability. , 10: 256-261. 045608
Srogi. (2007). Monitoring of environmental exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: a review. , 5' 169-195.
180049
Stanhill G; Cohen S. (2001). Global dimming: a review of the evidence for a widespread and significant
reduction in global radiation with discussion of its probable causes and possible agricultural
consequences. , 107: 255-278. 042121
Steinnes E; Hvatum 00; Bolviken B; Varskog P. (2005). Atmospheric supply of trace elements studied by peat
samples from ombrotrophic bogs. J Environ Qual, 34: 192-197. 156095
Stenchikov G; Hamilton K; Robock A; Ramaswamy V; Schwarzkopf MD. (2004). Arctic Oscillation response to
the 1991 Pinatubo eruption in the SKYHI GCM with a realistic quasi-biennial oscillation. J Geophys Res,
109: D03112. 192274
Stenchikov G; Hamilton K; Stouffer RJ; Robock A; Ramaswamy V; Santer B; Graf H"F. (2006). Arctic Oscillation
response to volcanic eruptions in the IPCC AR4 climate models. J Geophys Res, 111: D07107. 192260
Stenchikov G; Robock A; Ramaswamy V; Schwarzkopf MD; Hamilton K; Ramachandran S. (2002). Arctic
Oscillation response to the 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruption: Effects of volcanic aerosols and ozone
depletion. J Geophys Res, 107: D24. 192277
Stenchikov GL; Kirchner I; Robock A; Graf H"F; Antuna JC; Grainger RG; Lambert A; Thomason L. (1998).
Radiative forcing from the 1991 Mount Pinatubo volcanic eruption. J Geophys Res, 103: 13837-13857.
192049
Stephens G; et al. (2002). The CloudSat mission and the A-Train. , 83: 1771-1790. 190412
Stephens GL; Haynes JM. (2007). Near global observations of the warm rain coalescence process. Geophys Res
Lett, 34: L20805. 190413
July 2009
9-299
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Stern DI. (2005). Global sulfur emissions from 1850 to 2000. Chemosphere, 58- 163-175. 190416
Stern GA; Halsall CJ; Barrie LA; Muir DCG; Fellin P; Rosenberg B. (1997). Polychlorinated biphenyls in arctic
air. 1. Temporal and spatial trends' 1992-1994. Environ Sci Technol, 31- 3619-3628. 156096
Stevens B; Feingold G> Walko RL; Cotton WR. (1996). On elements of the microphysical structure of numerically
simulated non-precipitating stratocumulus. J Trace Elem Med Biol, 53- 980-1006. 190417
Stewart AR; Luoma SN; Schlekat CE; Doblin MA; Hieb KA. (2004). Food web pathway determines how
selenium affects aquatic ecosystems. Environ Sci Technol, 38- 4519-4526. 156097
Stier P; Seinfeld JH; Kinne S; Boucher O. (2007). Aerosol absorption and radiative forcing. , 7- 5237-5261.
157012
Stohl A; Andrews E; Burkhart JF; Forster C; Herber A; Hoch SW; Kowal D; Lunder C; Mefford T; Ogren JA;
Sharma S; Spichtinger N; Stebel K; Stone R; Strom J; Torseth K; Wehrli C; Yttri KE. (2006). Pan-Arctic
enhancements of light absorbing aerosol concentrations due to North American boreal forest fires during
summer 2004. J Geophys Res, 111, D22214, doi:i0.1029/2006JD007216: . 156100
Stohl A; Berg T; Burkhart JF; Fjeeraa AM; Forster C; Herber A; Hov 0; Lunder C; McMillan WW; Oltmans S;
Shiobara M; Dimpson D; Solberg S; Stebel K; Strom J; Torseth K; Treffeisen R; Virkkunen K; Yttri KE.
(2007). Arctic smoke - record high air pollution levels in the European Arctic due to agricultural fires in
Eastern Europe in spring 2006. , 7: 511-534. 157015
Storlevmo T; Kristjansson JE; Myhre G; Johnsud M; Stordal F. (2006). Combined observational and modeling
based study of the aerosol indirect effect. , 6- 3583-3601. 190418
Stothers RB. (2001). A chronology of annual mean effective radii of stratospheric aerosols from volcanic
eruptions during the twentieth century as derived from ground-based spectral extinction measurements.
J Geophys Res, 106: 32043-32049. 192233
Stothers RB. (2001). Major optical depth perturbations to the stratosphere from volcanic eruptions: Stellar
extinction period, 1961—1978. J Geophys Res, 106: 2993—3003. 192232
Stott PA. (2006). Observational constraints on past attributable warming and predictions of future global
warming. J dim, 19: 3055-3069. 190419
Strachan WMJ; Burniston DA; Williamson M; Bohdanowicz H. (2001). Spatial difference in persistent
organochlorine pollutant concentrations between the Bering and Chukchi Seas. Mar Pollut Bull, 43: 132-
142. 156103
Strandberg B; Axelsen JA; Pedersen MB; Jensen J; Attrill MJ. (2006). Effect of a copper gradient on plant
community structure. Environ Toxicol Chem, 25: 743-753. 156105
Strawa A; Castaneda R; Owano T; Baer P; Paldus B. (2002). The measurement of aerosol optical properties
using continuous wave cavity ring-down techniques. , 20: 454-465. 190421
Streets D; Bond T; Lee T; Jang C. (2004). On the future of carbonaceous aerosol emissions. J Geophys Res, 109:
D24212.190423
Streets D; Wu Y; Chin M. (2006). Two-decadal aerosol trends as a likely explanation of the global
dimming/brightening transition. Geophys Res Lett, 33: L15806. 190425
Streets DG; Aunan K. (2005). The importance of China's household sector for black carbon emissions. Geophys
Res Lett, 32. 156106
Streets DG; Zhang Q; Wang L; He K; Hao J; Wu Y; Tang Y; Carmichael GR. (2006). Revisiting China?s CO
emissions after the Transport and Chemical Evolution over the Pacific (TRACE-P) mission: Synthesis of
inventories, atmospheric modeling, and observations. J Geophys Res, 111: D14306. 157019
Strydom C; Robinson C; Pretorius E; Whitcutt JM; Marx J; Bornman MS. (2006). The effect of selected metals
on the central metabolic pathways in biology: A review. , 32: 543-554. 190486
Swackhamer DL; Paerl HW! Eisenreich SJ; Hurley J; Hornbuckle KC; McLachlan M; Mount D; Muir D;
Schindler D. (2004). Impacts of atmospheric pollutants on aquatic ecosystems. , 12: 1-24. 190488
Sweet C; Caughey M; Gay D. (2005). Midwest Ammonia Monitoring Project: Summary for October 2003 through
November 2004. Illinois State Water Survey. Illinois. 180038
Szabo L; Fodor L. (2006). Uptake of microelements by crops grown on heavy metal-amended soil. Commun Soil
Sci Plant Anal, 37: 2679-2689. 156109
Tabazadeh A; Drdla K; Schoeberl MR; Hamill P; Toon OB. (2002). Arctic " ozone hole" in a cold volcanic
stratosphere. , 99: 2609-2612. 192250
Takemura T; Nakajima T; Dubovik O; Holben B; Kinne S. (2002). Single -scattering albedo and radiative forcing
of various aerosol species with a global three-dimensional model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 15: 333-352.
190438
Takemura T; Nozawa T; Emori S; Nakajima T; Nakajima T. (2005). Simulation of climate response to aerosol
direct and indirect effects with aerosol transport-radiation model. J Geophys Res, 110: D02202. 190439
July 2009
9-300
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Tang IN. (1996). Chemical and size effects of hygroscopic aerosols on light scattering coefficients. J Geophys
Res, 101: 245-219. 157042
Tang Y> et al. (2003). Influences of biomass burning during the Transport and Chemical Evolution Over the
Pacific (TRACE-P) experiment identified by the regional chemical transport model. J Geophys Res, 108:
8824. 190441
Tang Y> et al. (2004). Three-dimensional simulations of inorganic aerosol distributions in East Asia during
spring 2001. J Geophys Res, 109: D19S23. 190445
Tanre D; et al. (2003). Measurement and modeling of the Saharan dust radiative impact: Overview of the
Saharan Dust Experiment (SHADE). J Geophys Res, 108: 8574. 190454
Tanre D; Kaufman Yi Herman Mi Mattoo S. (1997). Remote sensing of aerosol properties over oceans using the
MODIS/ EOS spectral radiances. J Geophys Res, 102: 16971-16988. 190452
Tao Si Jiao Xi Chen Si Xu Fi Li Yi Liu F. (2006). Uptake ofvapor and particulate polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons by cabbage. Environ Pollut, 140: 13—15. 156112
Taulavuori Ki Prasad MNVi Taulavuori Ei Laine K. (2005). Metal stress consequences on frost hardiness of
plants at northern high latitudes: a review and hypothesis. , 135: 209-220. 190489
Tett SFBi Jones GSi Stott PA; Hill DC; Mitchell JFB; Allen MR; Ingram WJ; Johns TC; Johnson CE; Jones A;
Roberts DL; Sexton DMH; Woodage MJ. (2002). Estimation of natural and anthropogenic contributions
to twentieth century temperature change. J Geophys Res, 107: 4306. 192053
Textor C; et al. (2007). The effect of harmonized emissions on aerosol properties in global models—an AeroCom
experiment. , T- 4489-4501. 190458
Textor C; Schulz M; Guibert S; et al. (2006). Analysis and quantification of the diversities of aerosol life cycles
within AEROCOM. , 6: 1777-1813. 190456
Thomas GO; Smith KEC; Sweetman AJ; Jones KC. (1998). Further studies of the air-pasture transfer of
polychlorinatedbiphenyls. , 102: 119-128. 156118
Thomason LW; Peter T. (2006). Assessment of Stratospheric Aerosol Properties (ASAP): Report on the
Assessment Kick"Off Workshop, Paris, France, 4"6 November 2001. Presented at Assessment of
Stratospheric Aerosol Properties , Paris, France. 192248
Tie X; et al. (2005). Assessment of the global impact of aerosols on tropospheric oxidants. J Geophys Res, 110: 0.
190459
Tie XX; Brasseur GP; Briegleb B; Granier C. (1994). Two-dimensional simulation of Pinatubo aerosol and its
effect on stratospheric ozone. J Geophys Res, 99: 20545-20562. 192253
Timmreck C; Graf HF; Steil B. (2003). Aerosol chemistry interactions after the Mt. Pinatubo eruption. In
Robock A; Oppenheimer C (Ed.),Volcanism and the earth's atmosphere (pp. 213-227). Washington, DC:
American Geophysical Union. 192254
Tombach I; McDonald K. (2004). Visibility and Radiative Balance Effects. In P.H. McMurry MFS, and J.S.
Vickery (Ed.),Particulate Matter Science for Policy Makers: A NARSTO Assessment: Cambridge
University Press. 157054
Toose LK; Mackay D. (2004). Adaptation of fugacity models to treat speciating chemicals with constant species
concentration ratios. Environ Sci Technol, 38: 4619—4626. 156123
Torres O; Bhartia P; Herman J; Ahmad Z; Gleason J. (1998). Derivation of aerosol properties from satellite
measurements of backscattered ultraviolet radiation: Theoretical bases. J Geophys Res, 103: 17009"
17110. 190503
Torres O; Bhartia P; Herman J; Sinyuk A; Ginoux P; Holben B. (2002). A long-term record of aerosol optical
depth from TOMS observations and comparison to AERONET measurements. J Trace Elem Med Biol,
59: 398-413. 190505
Torres O; Bhartia P; Sinyuk A; Welton E; Holben B. (2005). Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer measurements
of aerosol absorption from space: Comparison to SAFARI 2000 groundbased observations. J Geophys Res,
110: D10S18. 190507
Tremper AH; Agneta M; Burton S; Higgs DEB. (2004). Field and laboratory exposures of two moss species to low
level metal pollution. , 49: 111-120. 156126
Trijonis J; Thayer M; Murdoch J; Hagemen R. (1985). Air quality benefit analysis for Los Angeles and San
Francisco based on housing values and visibility 078468
Trijonis JC; Malm WC; Pitchford M; White WH; Charlson R. (1990). Acidic deposition: State of science and
technology. Report 24. Visibility: Existing and historical conditions-causes and effects. Final report.
157058
TSL Christopher S; Zhang J. (2002). Daytime variation of shortwave direct radiative forcing of biomass burning
aerosols from GOES-8 imager. J Trace Elem Med Biol, 59: 681-691. 190031
July 2009
9-301
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Turco RP; Toon OB; Whitten RC; Pollack JB; Hamill P. (1983). The global cycle of particulate elemental carbon:
a theoretical assessment. In Pruppacher HR (Ed.),Precipitation Scavenging, Dry Deposition, and
Resuspension (pp. 1337" 1351). New York: Elsevier Science. 190529
Twomey S. (1977). The influence of pollution on the shortwave albedo of clouds. J Trace Elem Med Biol, 34:
1149-1152. 190533
U.S. EPA,Zhang Q,Jimenez J,Canagaratna M,Allan J,Coe H,Ulbrich I,Alfarra M,Takami A,Middlebrook A,Sun
Y. (2007). Ubiquity and dominance of oxygenated species in organic aerosols in anthropogenically-
influenced Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes. , 34: L13801. 189998
U.S. EPA. (1979). Protecting Visibility, an EPA Report to Congress. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Washington, D.C.. 157065
U.S. EPA. (1982). Air quality criteria for particulate matter and sulfur oxides. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency. Washington, D.C.. 017610
U.S. EPA. (1993). Air quality criteria for oxides of nitrogen. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Washington, D.C.. 017649
U.S. EPA. (1996). Air quality criteria for particulate matter. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Research
Triangle Park, NC. EPA/600/P-95/001aF-cF. 079380
U.S. EPA. (1997). Mercury Study Report to Congress. 157066
U.S. EPA. (2004). Air quality criteria for particulate matter. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Research
Triangle Park, NC. EPA/600/P-99/002aF-bF. 056905
U.S. EPA. (2005). Review of the national ambient air quality standards for particulate matter: Policy
assessment of scientific and technical information OAQPS staff paper. U.S. EPA. Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina. 090209
U.S. EPA. (2006). Air quality criteria for lead. 090110
U.S. EPA. (2008). Integrated science assessment for oxides of nitrogen and sulfur: Ecological criteria. EPA.
Research Triangle Park, NC. EPA/600/R-08/082F. 157074
US Environmental Protection Agency. (2004). The Particle Pollution Report: Current Understanding of Air
Quality and Emissions through 2003. US EPA. Research Triangle Park, NC. EPA 454-R-04-002. 190219
Vaisvalavicius R; Motuzas A; Prosycevas L Levinskaite L; Zakarauskaite D; Grigaliuniene K; Butkus V. (2006).
Effect of heavy metals on microbial communities and enzymatic activity in soil column experiment. Arch
Agron SoH Sci, 52: 161-169. 157080
Van Aardenne JA; Dentener FJ; Olivier JGJ; Klein Goldewijk CGM; Lelieveld J. (2001). A l"degree" x l"degree"
resolution data set of historical anthropogenic trace gas emissions for the period 1980-1990. Global
Biogeochem Cycles, 15: 909-928. 055564
Van de Hulst H. (1981). Light scattering by small particles. New York: Dover. 191972
van Heerden PDR; Kriiger GHJ; Kilbourn Louw M. (2007). Dynamic responses of photosystem II in the Namib
Desert shrub, Zygophyllum prismatocarpum, during and after foliar deposition of limestone dust. , 146:
34-45. 156131
Van Donkelaar A; Martin RV; Park RJ. (2006). Estimating ground-level PM2.5 using aerosol optical depth
determined from satellite remote sensing . J Geophys Res, 111: D21. 192108
Vasundhara G> Jayashree G> Muraleedhara-Kurup G. (2004). Sequestration of nickel and copper by Azotobacter
chroococcum SB1. , 72: 1122-1127. 156133
Vautard R; Maidi Mi Menut Li Beekmann Mi Colette A. (2007). Boundary layer photochemistry simulated with
a two-stream convection scheme. Atmos Environ, 41: 8275-8287. 106012
Veihelmann Bi Levelt PFi Stammes Pi Veefkind JP. (2007). Simulation study of the aerosol information content
in OMI spectral reflectance measurements. , 7' 3115-3127. 190627
Verdelhos Ti Neto JMi Marques JCi Pardal MA. (2005). The effect of eutrophication abatement on the bivalve
Scrobicularia plana. , 63: 261-268. 190497
Viard Bi Pihan Fi Promeyrat Si Pihan J-C. (2004). Integrated assessment of heavy metal (Pb, Zn, Cd) highway
pollution: bioaccumulation in soil, graminaceae and land snails. Chemosphere, 55: 1349-1314. 055675
Viles HAi Gorbushina AA. (2003). Soiling and microbial colonisation on urban roadside limestone: A three year
study in Oxford, England. , 38: 1217-1224. 156138
Viles HA; Taylor MP; Yates TJS; Massey SW. (2002). Soiling and decay of N.M.E.P. limestone tablets. Sci Total
Environ, 292: 215-229. 156137
Villa S; Vighi M; Maggi V; Finizio A; Bolzacchini E. (2003). Historical trends of organochlorine pesticides in an
Alpine glacier. , 46: 295-311. 156139
Viskari E"L; Karenlampi L. (2000). Roadside Scots pine as an indicator of deicing salt use - a comparative study
from two consecutive winters. Water Air Soil Pollut, 122: 405-419. 019101
July 2009
9-302
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Vivas A; Barea JM; Biro B; Azcon R. (2006). Effectiveness of autochthonous bacterium and mycorrhizal fungus
on Trifolium growth, symbiotic development and soil enzymatic activities in Zn contaminated soil. J Appl
Microbiol, 100: 587-598. 190500
Vivas A; Voros A; Biro B; Barea JM; Ruiz-Lozano JM; Azcon R. (2003). Beneficial effects of indigenous Cd-
tolerant and Cd-sensitive Glomus mosseae associated with a Cd-adapted strain of Brevibacillus sp in
improving plant tolerance to Cd contamination. , 24- 177-186. 190499
Vives I; Grimalt JO; Ventura M; Catalan J. (2005). Distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the food
web of a high mountain lake, Pyrenees, Catalonia, Spain. Environ Toxicol Chem, 24- 1344-1352. 157099
Vogel-Mikus K; Drobne D; Regvar M. (2005). Zn, Cd and Pb accumulation and arbuscular mycorrhizal
colonisation of pennycress Thlaspi praecox Wulf. (Brassicaceae) from the vicinity of a lead mine and
smelter in Slovenia. , 133- 233-242. 190501
Vogel-Mikus K; Pongrac P; Kump P; Necemer M; Regvar M. (2006). Colonisation of a Zn, Cd and Pb
hyperaccumulator Thlaspi praecox Wulfen with indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal mixture
induces changes in heavy metal and nutrient uptake. , 139- 362-371. 190502
Waggoner AP; Weiss RE. (1980). Comparison of fine particle mass concentration and light scattering extinction
in ambient aerosol. Atmos Environ, 14- 623-626. 070152
Waggoner AP; Weiss RE; Ahlquist NC; Covert DS; Will S; Charlson RJ. (1981). Optical characteristics of
atmospheric aerosols. Atmos Environ, 15- 1891-1909. 095453
Wang C. (2007). Impact of direct radiative forcing of black carbon aerosols on tropical convective precipitation.
Geophys Res Lett, 34: 5709. 156147
Wang Y-Z; Ingram JL; Walters DM; Rice AB; Santos JH; Van Houten B; Bonner JC. (2003). Vanadium-induced
STAT-1 activation in lung myofibroblasts requires H202 and P38 MAP kinase. Free Radic Biol Med, 35:
845-855. 157106
Wania F; Hoff JT; Jia CQ; Mackay D. (1998). The effects of snow and ice on the environmental behaviour of
hydrophobic organic chemicals. , 102: 43-51. 156148
Wania F; Mackay D. (1993). Global fractionation and cold condensation of low volatility organochlorine
compounds in polar regions. Ambio, 22: 10-18. 157110
Warner J. (1968). A reduction in rainfall associated with smoke from sugar-cane fires—an inadvertent weather
modification?. , T- 247-251. 157114
Warner J; Twomey S. (1967). The production of cloud nuclei by cane fires and the effect on cloud droplet
concentration. J Trace Elem Med Biol, 24: 704-706. 045616
Watmough SA; Hutchinson TC; Dillon PJ. (2004). Lead dynamics in the forest floor and mineral soil in south-
central Ontario. , 71: 43-68. 077809
Watson JG; Chow JC. (2007). Receptor models for source apportionment of suspended particles. In Introduction
to Environmental Forensics (pp. x). x: x. 157127
Watson JG; Zhu T; Chow JC; Engelbrecht J; Fujita EM; Wilson WE. (2002). Receptor modeling application
framework for particle source apportionment. Chemosphere, 49: 1093-1136. 035623
Weissenhorn I; Leyval C; Berthelin J. (1995). Bioavailability of heavy metals and abundance of arbuscular
mycorrhiza in a soil polluted by atmospheric deposition from a smelter. , 19: 22"28. 073826
Welton E; Voss K; Quinn P; Flatau P; Markowicz K; Campbell J; Spinhirne J; Gordon H; Johnson J. (2002).
Measurements of aerosol vertical profiles and optical properties during INDOEX 1999 using micro-pulse
lidars. J Geophys Res, 107: 8019. 190631
Welton EJ; Campbell JR; Spinhirne JD; Scott VS. (2001). Global monitoring of clouds and aerosols using a
network of micro-pulse lidar systems. : . 157133
Wen T; Wang Y; Chang SY; Liu G. (2006). On-line Measurement of Water-Soluble Ions in Ambient Particles. ,
23: 586-592. 179964
Wetzel MA; Stowe LL. (1999). Satellite-observed patterns in stratus microphysics, aerosol optical thickness, and
shortwave radiative forcing. J Geophys Res, 104: 31287-31299. 190636
Wielicki B; Barkstrom B; Harrison E; Lee R; Smith G; Cooper J. (1996). Clouds and the Earth's radiant energy
system (CERES): An Earth observing system experiment. , 77: 853-868. 190637
Wild E; Dent J; Thomas GO; Jones KC. (2005). Direct observation of organic contaminant uptake, storage, and
metabolism within plant roots. Environ Sci Technol, 39: 3695-3702. 156156
Wild SR; Jones KC. (1992). Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons uptake by carrots grown in sludge amended soil.
J Environ Qual, 21: 217- 225. 156155
Winker D; Couch R; McCormick M. (1996). An overview of LITE: NASA's Lidar In-Space Technology
Experiment. , 84: 164-180. 190914
Winker DM; Pelon J; McCormick MP. (2003). The CALIPSO mission: spaceborne lidar for observation of
aerosols and clouds. , 4893: 1-11. 192017
July 2009
9-303
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Wolff GT. (1985). Characteristics and consequences of soot in the atmosphere. Environ Int, 11- 259-269. 044680
Wyszkowska J; Boros Ei Kucharski J. (2007). Effect of interactions between nickel and other heavy metals on
the soil microbiological properties. , 53- 544-552. 179948
Xu J; DuBois D; Pitchford M; Green M; Etyemezian V. (2006). Attribution of sulfate aerosols in Federal Class I
areas of the western United States based on traiectory regression analysis. Atmos Environ, 40- 3433"
3447. 102706
Xue H; Feingold G. (2006). Large eddy simulations of tradewind cumuli- Investigation of aerosol indirect effects.
J Trace Elem Med Biol, 63: 1605-1622. 190920
Xue H; Feingold G; Stevens B. (2008). Aerosol effects on clouds, precipitation, and the organization of shallow
cumulus convection. J Trace Elem Med Biol, 65: 392" 406. 190921
Yang CY; Chen CJ. (2007). Air pollution and hospital admissions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a
subtropical city: Taipei, Taiwan. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 70' 1214-9. 092847
Yang F; Schlesinger M. (2001). Identification and separation of Mount Pinatubo and El Nino-Southern
Oscillation land surface temperature anomalies. J Geophys Res, 106: 14757—14770. 192270
Yang XE; Jin XF; Feng Yi Islam E. (2005). Molecular mechanisms and genetic basis of heavy metal
tolerance/hyperaccumulation in plants. , 47: 1025-1035. 192104
Yang Z; Zhu L. (2007). Performance of the partition-limited model on predicting ryegrass uptake of polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons. Chemosphere, 67: 402-409. 156168
Ying Q; Kleeman MJ. (2006). Source contributions to the regional distribution of secondary particulate matter
in California. Atmos Environ, 40: 736-752. 098359
Yogui G> Sericano J. (2008). Polybrominated diphenyl ether flame retardants in lichens and mosses from King
George Island, maritime Antarctica. Chemosphere, 73: 1589-1593. 189971
Yu H, et al. (2006). A review of measurement-based assessments of the aerosol direct radiative effect and
forcing. , 6: 613-666. 156173
Yu H; Dickinson R; Chin M; Kaufman Y; Zhou M; Zhou L; Tian Y; Dubovik O; Holben B. (2004). The direct
radiative effect of aerosols as determined from a combination of MODIS retrievals and GOCART
simulations. J Geophys Res, 109: D03206. 190926
Yu H; Liu S; Dickinson R. (2002). Radiative effects of aerosols on the evolution of the atmospheric boundary
layer. J Geophys Res, 107: 4142. 190923
Yu IJ; Park JD; Park ES; Song KS; Han KT; Han JH; Chung YH; Choi BS; Chung KH; Cho MH. (2003).
Manganese distribution in brains of Sprague-Dawley rats after 60 days of stainless steel welding-fume
exposure. Neurotoxicology, 24: 777-785. 156171
Yui et al. (2007). Translocation and effects of gold nanoparticles after inhalation exposure in rats. , 2' 713-717.
093173
Yuangen Y> Campbell CD; Clark L; Camerson CM; Paterson E. (2006). Microbial indicators of heavy metal
contamination in urban and rural soils. Chemosphere, 63: 1942-1952. 156174
Yunker MB; Snow don LR; MacDonald RW; Smith JN; Fowler MG; Skibo DN. (1996). Polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbon composition and potential sources for sediment samples from the Beufort and Barents Seas.
Environ Sci Technol, 30: 1310-1320. 156175
Zaccone C; Cocozza C; Cheburkin AK; Shotyk W; Miano TM. (2007). Highly Organic Soils as "Witnesses" of
Anthropogenic Pb, Cu, Zn, and 137Cs Inputs During Centuries. Water Air Soil Pollut, 186: 263-271.
179930
Zappia G; Sabbioni C; Riontino C; Gobbi G; Favoni O. (1998). Exposure tests of building materials in urban
atmosphere. Sci Total Environ, 224: 235-244. 012037
Zechmeister HG. (1998). Annual growth of four pleurocarpous moss species and their applicability for
biomonitoring heavy metals. Environ Monit Assess, 52: 441-451. 156178
Zechmeister HG; Hohenwallner D; Riss A; Hanus-Illnar A. (2003). Variation in heavy metal concentrations in
the moss species Abietinella abietina (Hedw.) Fleisch. according to sampling time, within site variability
and increase in biomass. Sci Total Environ, 301: 55"65. 157175
Zeidner M; Shechter M. (1988). Psycological responses to air polution: Some personality and demographic
correlates. , 8: 191-208. 191973
Zhang J; Christopher S. (2003). Longwave radiative forcing of Saharan dust aerosols estimated from MODIS,
MISR, and CERES observations on Terra. Geophys Res Lett, 30: 2188. 190928
Zhang J; Christopher S; Remer L; Kaufman Y. (2005). Shortwave aerosol radiative forcing over cloud-free
oceans from Terra. I: Angular models for aerosols. J Geophys Res, 110: D10S23. 190929
Zhang J; Christopher S; Remer L; Kaufman Y. (2005). Shortwave aerosol radiative forcing over cloud-free
oceans from Terra. II: Seasonal and global distributions. J Geophys Res, 110: D10S24. 190930
July 2009
9-304
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Zhang J; Reid JS; Holben BN. (2005). An analysis of potential cloud artifacts in MODIS over ocean aerosol
optical thickness products. Geophys Res Lett, 32- L15803. 190931
Zhang J; Reid JS; Westphal DL; Baker NL; Hyer EJ. (2008). A system for operational aerosol optical depth data
assimilation over global oceans. J Geophys Res, 113- D10208. 190932
Zhang KM; Wexler AS; Niemeier DA; Zhu YF; Sioutas W; Sioutas C. (2005). Evolution of particle number
distribution near roadways Part III- traffic on-road size resolved particulate emission factors. Atmos
Environ, 39: 4155-4166. 086743
Zhang Q; Jimenez JL; Canagaratna MR; Jayne JT; Worsnop DR. (2005). Time- and size-resolved chemical
composition of submicron particles in Pittsburgh: Implications for aerosol sources and processes. J
Geophys Res, 110: 1-19. 157185
Zhang X; Zwiers FW; Stott PA. (2006). Multi-model multisignal climate change detection at regional scale. J
Clim, 19: 4294-4307. 190933
Zhang XH; Zhu YG; Chen BD; Lin AJ; Smith SE; Smith FA. (2005). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi contribute to
resistance of upland rice to combined metal contamination of soil. , 28: 2065-2077. 192083
Zhang XZ; Sun HW; Zhang ZY. (2006). [Bioaccumulation of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in carp]. , 27: 1631-5.
157722
Zhao TXP; Laszlo I; Guo W', Heidinger A; Cao C; Jelenak A; Tarpley D; Sullivan J. (2008). Study of long-term
trend in aerosol optical thickness observed from operational AVHRR satellite instrument. J Geophys Res,
113: DQ7201.190935
Zhao TXP; Yu H; Laszlo I; Chin M; Conant WC. (2008). Derivation of component aerosol direct radiative forcing
at the top of atmosphere for clear-sky oceans. , 109: 1162-1186. 190936
Zhou M, et al.. (2005). A normalized description of the direct effect of key aerosol types on solar radiation as
estimated from aerosol robotic network aerosols and moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer
albedos. J Geophys Res, 110, D19202, doi:i0.1029/2005JD005909: . 156183
Zhu Y; Hinds WC; Shen S; Sioutas C. (2004). Seasonal trends of concentration and size distribution of ultrafine
particles near major highways in Los Angeles. Aerosol Sci Technol, 38: 5-13. 156184Zimmer D; Baum C;
Leinweber P; Hrynkiewicz K; Meissner R. (2009). Associated bacteria increase the phytoextraction of
cadmium and zinc from a metal-contaminated soil by mycorrhizal willows. ,11: 200-213. 192085
July 2009
9-305
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Annex A. Atmospheric Science
A.1. Ambient Air Particle Monitoring
A.1.1. Measurements and Analytical Specifications
Table A-1.
Summary of integrated and continuous samplers included in the field comparison.
Abbreviation
i Instrument
Manufacturer / Research Institute
INTEGRATED PARTICLE OR GAS/PARTICLE INSTRUMENTS
Dichot
Dichotomous Sampler with Virtual Impactor
Andersen Instruments (Smyrna, GA
AND-241 Dichot
Thermo Andersen Series 241 Dichotomous Sampler
Andersen Instruments
AND-246 Dichot
Thermo Andersen SA-246B Dichotomous Sampler
Andersen Instruments
AI\ID-hlV0L10FRM
Thermo Andersen GMW-1200 HiVol PMio FRM Sampler
Andersen Instruments
ARA-PCM
ARA Particle Composition Monitor
Atmospheric Research and Analysis Inc. (Piano, TX)
CMU
CMU Speciation Sampler
Carnegie Mellon University (CMU), (Pittsburgh, PA)
DRI-SFS
DRI Sequential Filter Sampler
Desert Research Institute (Reno, NV)
HEADS (or HI)
Harvard EPA Annular Denuder System (or Harvard Impactor)
Harvard School of Public Health (Boston, MA)
IMPROVESS"
IMPROVE Speciation Sampler
URG Corp. (Chapel Hill, NC)
URG-3000Nb
Modined IMPROVE Module C Sampler for Carbon
URG Corp.
MASS-400b
URG Mass Aerosol Speciation Sampler Model 400
URG Corp.
MASS-450b
URG MASS Model 450
URG Corp.
MiniVol
Battery-Powered Portable Low-Volume Sampler
Air Metrics Inc. (Eugene, OR)
PC-BOSS
Particle Concentrator-Brigham Young University Organic
Brigham Young University (Provo, UT)
SAMPLING SYSTEM
PQ-200 FRM
BGI PQ-200 FRM Sampler
BGI Inc. (Waltham, MA)
PQ-200 FRMA
BGI PQ-200A FRM Audit Sampler
BGI Inc.
R&P-ACCU
R&P-Automated Cartridge Collector Unit Sampler
Rupprecht & Patashnick, Co. (Albany, NY
R&P-2000 FRM
R&P Partisol-2000 FRM Sampler
Rupprecht & Patashnick, Co.
R&P-2000 FRMA
R&P Partisol-2000 FRM Audit Sampler
Rupprecht & Patashnick, Co.
R&P-2025 Dichot"
R&P Partisol 2025 Dichotomous Sequential Air Sampler
Rupprecht & Patashnick, Co.
R&P-2025 FRM
R&P Partisol-Plus Model 2025 PM2.6 Sequential Samplers
Rupprecht & Patashnick, Co.
R&P-2300b
R&P Partisol 2300 Chemical Speciation Sampler
Rupprecht & Patashnick, Co.
Note- Hyperlinks to the reference citations throughout this document will take you to the NCEA HERO database (Health
and Environmental Research Online) at http • I lev a. go v/her o. HERO is a database of scientific literature used by U.S. EPA in
the process of developing science assessments such as the Integrated Science Assessments (ISA) and the Integrated Risk
Information System (IRIS).
July 2009
A-l
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Abbreviation
Instrument
Manufacturer / Research Institute
RAAS-100 FRM Thermo Andersen Reference Ambient Air Sampler Model 100 Andersen Instruments
FRM SAMPLER
RAAS-200 FRM
Thermo Andersen RAAS Model 200 FRM Audit Sampler
Andersen Instruments
RAAS-300 FRM
Thermo Andersen RAAS Model 300 FRM Sampler
Andersen Instruments
RAAS-400b
Thermo Andersen RAAS Model 400 Speciation Sampler
Andersen Instruments
SASSb
MetOne Spiral Ambient Speciation Sampler
Met One Instruments (Grants Pass, OR)
SCS
PM2.E Sequential Cyclone Sampler
New York University (New York, NY)
URG-PCMb
URG Particle Composition Monitor
URG Corp. (Chapel Hill, NC)
VAPS
URG Versatile Air Pollution Sampler
URG Corp.
CONTINUOUS MASS INSTRUMENTS
BAM
B-Attenuation Monitor Model 1020
Met One Instruments
nano-BAM
Met One BAM Model 1020 with 150 nm impactor
Met One Instruments
CAMM
Continuous Ambient Mass Monitor
Developed by Harvard School of Public Health, comercialized by
Thermo Andersen Instruments; now withdrawn from market
RAMS
Real-Time Ambient Mass Sampler (modined Tapered Element Oscillation
Microbalance with diffusion denuder and Nanon dryer)
Brigham Young University
TEOM
Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance
Rupprecht 81 Patashnick, Co.
30 °C-TE0M
TEOM operated at 30 °C
Rupprecht 81 Patashnick, Co.
50 °C-TE0M
TEOM operated at 50 °C
Rupprecht 81 Patashnick, Co.
SESTEOM
TEOM 1400a Series with Sample Equilibration System
Rupprecht 81 Patashnick, Co.
D-TEOM
Differential TEOM
Rupprecht 81 Patashnick, Co.
FDMS-TEOM
Filter Dynamics Measurement System TEOM
Rupprecht 81 Patashnick, Co.
ACCU-TEOM
TEOM 1400 Series with an automated cartridge collection unit
Rupprecht 81 Patashnick, Co.
CONTINUOUS PARTICLE LIGHT SCA TTERING INSTRUMENTS
Dust Trak
Dust Trak nephelometer
TSI Inc. (Shoreview, MN)
EcoTech
EcoTech Model M9003 nephelometer
EcoTech Pty Ltd., Australia (American EcoTech, Warren, Rl)
NGN
NGN-2 nephelometer
Optec Inc. (Lowell, Ml)
RR-M903
Radiance Research Nephelometer Model M903
Radiance Research Inc. (Seattle, WA)
CONTINUOUS ELEMENT INSTRUMENTS
GFAAS
Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry-aerosol collection
as preconcentrate slurry
University of Maryland (College Park, MD)
SEAS
Semicontinuous Elements in Aerosol Sampler
University of Maryland
CONTINUOUS NITRA TE INSTRUMENTS
ADI-N
Aerosol Dynamics Inc. dash volatilization analyzer
Aerosol Dynamics Inc. (Berkeley, CA)
ARAN
Atmospheric Research and Analysis NO3 analyzer
Atmospheric Research and Analysis Inc.
R&P-8400N
R&P-8400N Flash Volatilization Continuous NO3' Analyzer
Rupprecht 81 Patashnick, Co.
CONTINUOUS SULFA TE INSTRUMENTS
ADI-S
Aerosol Dynamics Inc. Flash Volatilization Analyzer
Aerosol Dynamics Inc.
CASM
Continuous Ambient Sulfate Monitor (prototype of the TE-5020 by
Thermo Electron [Franklin, MA])
Harvard School of Public Health
July 2009
A-2
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Abbreviation
Instrument
Manufacturer / Research Institute
R&P-8400S R&P-8400S Flash Volatilization Continuous SO42' Analyzer Rupprecht & Patashnick, Co.
TE-5020
Thermo Electron Model 5020 SO42' Particulate Analyzer
Thermo Electron Corp. (Franklin, MA)
CONTINUOUS MUL Tl ION INSTRUMENTS
AIM
Ambient Ion Monitor Model 9000 (CI',N02',N03',P043',
S042", NH4+,Na+,Mg2+,K+,Ca2+)
URG Corp.
~ionex-IC
Dionex Ion Chromatograph (F, CI", NO2', Br',N03', PO43', SO42', Li+,
NH4+ ,Na+,Mg2+,K+,Ca2+)
Dionex Corp.
ECN
Energy Research Center of the Netherlands IC-based sampler (CI , NO3',
S042+,NH4+,Na+,Mg2+,K+,Ca2+)
Energy Research Center of the Netherlands (Petten, the
Netherlands
PILS-IC
Particle into Liquid Sampler, coupled with IC (CI, NO2', NO3', PO43',
S042+,NH4+,Na+,Mg2+,K+,Ca2+)
Georgia Institute of Technology (Atlanta, GA)
TT
Texas Tech IC-based sampler (NO3', S042+)
Texas Tech University (Lubbock, TX)
CONTINUOUS CARBON INSTRUMENTS
OC and EC
ADI-C
ADI Flash Volatilization Carbon Analyzer
Aerosol Dynamics Inc.
RU-OGI
Rutgers University/Oregon Graduate Institute in-situ carbon analyzer
(OC, EC)
Rutgers University (Camden, NJHOregon Graduate Institute
(Beaverton, OR)
R&P-5400
R&P-5400 continuous ambient carbon analyzer
Rupprecht 81 Patashnick, Co.
Sunset OCEC
Sunset Semi-Continuous Real-Time Carbon Aerosol Analysis Instrument
Sunset Laboratory, Inc. (Tigard, OR)
BC
Aethalometer
Magee Scientinc Co. (Berkeley, CA)
AE-16
Magee AE-16 aethalometer (BC)
Magee Scientinc Co.
AE-20
Magee AE-20 dual wavelength aethalometer (BC)
Magee Scientinc Co.
AE-21
Magee AE-21 dual-wavelength aethalometer (BC)
Magee Scientinc Co.
AE-31
Magee AE-31 seven color aethalometer (BC)
Magee Scientinc Co.
DRI-PA
DRI Photoacoustic Analyzer (BC)
Droplet Measurement Technologies, Inc. (Boulder, CO)
MAAP
Multi-Angle Absorption Photometer, Model 5012 (BC)
Thermo Scientinc Corp. (Franklin, MA)
PSAP
Particle Soot Absorption Photometer (BC)
Radiance Research Inc. (Seattle, WA)
OTHER CARBON
PASPAH
Photo-lonization Monitor for PAHs (Model PAS 2000)
EcoChem Analytics (League City, TX)
PILS-WSOC
PILS-WSOC Analyzer, combination of PILS and total organic analyzer
(TOA)
Georgia Institute of Technology
PARTICLE SIZING INSTRUMENTS FOR MASS AND CHEMICAL SPECIA TION
DRUM-3
Davis Rotating-Drum Uniform Size-Cut Monitor (0.1-2.5/jm in three
stages)
University of California-Davis (Davis, CA)
DRUM-8
Davis Rotating-Drum Uniform Size-Cut Monitor (0.09- > 5.0/jm in
eight stages)
University of California-Davis
ELPI
Electrical Low Pressure Impactor (0.007-10 //m in 12 stages)
Dekati (Tampere, Finland)
LPI
Low Pressure Impactor (0.03-10 /jm in 13 stages)
Aerosol Dynamics, Inc.
MOUDI
Micro Orince Uniform Deposit Impactor
MSP Corp. (Minneapolis, MN)
MOUDI-100
MOUDI Model 100 (0.18-18/jm in eight stages)
MSP Corp.
M0UDI-110
MOUDI Model 110 (0.056-18/jm in 10 stages)
MSP Corp.
July 2009
A-3
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Abbreviation
Instrument
Manufacturer / Research Institute
Nano-MOUDI
Nano M0UDI (0.010-0.056//m in three stages coupled to M0UDI
Model 110)
MSP Corp.
PARTICLE NUMBER/ VOLUME INSTRUMENTS
APS
Aerodynamic Particle Sizer
TSI Inc.
APS-3320
TSI Model 3320 (0.5-20//m)
TSI Inc.
APS-3321
TSI Model 3321 (0.5-20 fjm; replaced TSI Model 3320)
TSI Inc.
DMA
Differential Mobility Analyzer
TSI Inc.
DMA-3081
TSI Model 3081 (0.01-1.0 m)
TSI Inc.
DMA-3085
TSI Model 3085 (0.002-0.15//m)
TSI Inc.
EEPS
Engine Exhaust Particle Sizer (EEPS 0.056-0.56//m)
TSI Inc.
FMPS
Fast Mobility Particle Sizer (FMPS 0.056-0.56//m)
TSI Inc.
GRIMM-1108
Optical Particle Counter (OPC; 0.3-20 //m)
GRIMM Technologies, Inc. (Douglasville, GA)
SMPS
Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer
TSI Inc.
SMPS-3936
TSI Model 3936L (0.01-1.0//m)
TSI Inc.
Nano-SMPS-3936 TSI Model 3936N (0.002-0.15 //m)
TSI Inc.
SMPS + C
SMPS and Condensation Nucleus Counter (0.005-0.35 or 0.01-0.875
/jm)
GRIMM Technologies, Inc.
SMPS-custom
DMA Model 3071 and CPC Model 3010
TSI Inc.
WPS
Wide-Range Particle Spectrometer (0.01-10.0//m)
MSP Corp.
SINGLE PARTICLE INSTRUMENTS
AMS
Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (0.04-2//m)
Aerodyne Research Inc. (Billerica, MA)
AT0FMS
Aerosol Time of Flight Mass Spectrometer (0.3-2.5 //m)
TSI Inc.
CNC, CPC
Condensation Nucleus Counters, Condensation Particle Counter
Various vendors
DAASS
Dry-Ambient Aerosol Size Spectrometer consisting of two SMPS and
One APS (0.003—10 //m)
Carnegie Mellon University
LIBS
Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy
National Research Council, Industrial Materials Institute
(Boucherville, Quebec, Canada)
PALMS
Particle Analysis by Laser Mass Spectrometer (0.22-2.5//m)
NOAA (Boulder, CO)
RSMS-II
Rapid Single Particle Mass Spectrometer -II (0.035-1.1 //m)
University of Delaware (Newark, DE)
RSMS-III
Rapid Single Particle Mass Spectrometer RSMS-III (0.01 -2.0 //m)
University of Delaware
LABORA TORY INSTRUMENTS
DRI Model 2001
DRI Model 2001 Thermal/Optical Carbon Analyzer (OC, EC, Eight Carbon
Fractions with renectance and transmittance laser correction)
Atmoslytic, Inc. (Calabasas, CA)
SEM
Scanning Electron Microscopy
Various vendors
8Now with Thermo Scientific, Franklin, MA.
bEPA-approved speciation sampler used in the Speciation Trends Network (STN).
eNow commercialized by Applikon Analytical, the Netherlands, and marketed under the name "MARGA" (Monitor for Aerosols and Gases in Ambient Air).
dNot available.
Source: Chow et al. (2008,156355)
July 2009
A-4
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table A-2. Summary of PM2.5 and PM10 FRM and FEM samplers.
Manufacturer3
Sampler
Name
Size
Cut"
Description
FRM or
FEMC
Designation #
FRN
BGI Inc.
PQ-100
PM10
Louvered PMio inlet; operates at flow rate of 16.7 L/min; 24-h integrated
sampler; uses a mass flow meter to adjust to equivalent volumetric flow at
FRM
RFPS-1298-124
Vol. 63, p. 69625,
12/17/98
BGI Inc.
PQ-200
PM10
ambient temperature and pressure.
FRM
RFPS-1298-125
Vol. 63, p. 69625,
12/17/98
BGI Inc.
PQ-200
PM2.B
Identical to PMio sampler, but uses a WINS9 impactor downstream of the
PMio inlet for PM2.6 fractionation at 16.7 L/min; 24-h integrated sampler.
FRM
RFPS-0498-116
Vol. 63, p. 18911,
04/16/98
Vol. 63, p. 31993,
06/11/98
BGI Inc.
PQ-200VSCC
PM2.B
Same as BGI PQ200 PM2.6 sampler, but with BGI VSCC instead of WINS
FEM (II)
EQPM-0202-142 Vol. 67, p. 15567,
or PQ-200A-
impactor; PQ200A is a portable audit sampler, similar in design to PQ-200,
04/02/02
VSCC
but more compact in nature.
R&P
R&P-2000
PM10
R&P Partisol FRM Model 2000 PMio sampler with louvered PMio inlet;
operates at flow rate of 16.7 L/min; 24-h integrated sampler; uses a mass
flow meter to adjust to equivalent volumetric flow at ambient temperature
and pressure; single-channel sampler.
FRM
RFPS-1298-126
Vol. 63, p. 69625,
12/17/98
R&P
R&P-2000
PM2.B
R&P Partisol FRM Model 2000 PM2.6 sampler, identical to PMio sampler, but
uses a WINS impactor downstream of the PMio inlet for PM2.6 fractionation
FRM
RFPS-0498-117
Vol. 63, p. 18911,
04/16/98
R&P
R&P2000A
PM2.6
at 16.7 L/min; 24-h integrated sampler; R&P2000A is a portable audit
sampler.
FRM
RFPS-0499-129
Vol. 64, p. 19153,
04/19/99
R&P
R&P-2025
PM10
R&P Partisol-Plus Model 2025 PMio sequential sampler with louvered PMio
inlet; operates at 16.7 L/min; 24-h integrated sampler; uses a mass flow
meter to adjust to equivalent volumetric flow at ambient temperature and
pressure; sequential sampler with a capacity of 16 filter cassettes, allowing
for two weeks of unattended daily sampling; filter exchange is performed
pneumatically.
FRM
RFPS-1298-127
Vol. 63, p. 69625,
12/17/98
R&P
R&P-2025
PM2.B
R&P Partisol-Plus Model 2025 PM2.6 sequential sampler, identical to R&P-
2025 PMio sampler, but uses a WINS impactor downstream of the PMio inlet
for PM2.6 fractionation at 16.7 L/min.
FRM
RFPS-0498-118
Vol. 63, p. 18911,
04/16/98
R&P
R&P2000-
PM2.B
Same as R&P-2000 PM2.6 sampler, but with BGI VSCC, instead of WINS
FEM (II)
EQPM-0202-143 Vol. 67, p. 15567,
VSCC
impactor for PM2.6 separation.
04/02/02
R&P
R&P2000A-
PM2.B
Same as R&P-2000A PM2.6 sampler, but with BGI VSCC instead of WINS
FEM (II)
EQPM-0202-144 Vol. 67, p. 5567,
VSCC
impactor for PM2.6 separation.
04/02/02
R&P
R&P-2025-
PM2.B
Same as R&P-2025 PM2.6 sampler, but with BGI VSCC instead of WINS
FEM (II)
EQPM-0202-145 Vol. 67, p. 15567,
VSCC
impactor, for PM2.6 separation.
04/02/02
Andersen
RAAS-100
PM10
Andersen Instruments, Inc. Model RAAS10-100 PMio sampler with louvered
PMio inlet; operates at flow rate of 16.7 L/min; 24-h integrated sampler;
volumetric flow measured by dry test meter at pump outlet modulates pump
speed to maintain flow rate; single-channel.
FRM
RFPS-0699-130
Vol. 64, p. 33481,
06/23/99
Andersen
RAAS-100
PM2.B
Graseby Andersen Model RAAS2.5-100 PM2.6 sampler, similar to RAAS-100
PMio with a WINS impactor for PM2.6 separation.
FRM
RFPS-0598-119
Vol 63, p. 31991,
06/11/98
Andersen
RAAS200A
PM10
Andersen Instruments, Inc. Model RAAS10-200 and RAAS2.5-100 Audit
Samplers, portable compact version; similar to RAAS-100.
FRM
RFPS-0699-131
Vol. 64, p. 33481,
06/23/99
Andersen
RAAS-200A
PM2.B
FRM
RFPS-0299-128
Vol. 64, p. 12167,
03/11/99
Andersen
RAAS-300
PM10
Andersen Instruments, Inc. Model RAAS10-300, sequential sampler with
louvered PMio inlet, operates at 16.7 L/min; capacity to hold eight
filter-holders for multiple day operation.
FRM
RFPS-0699-132
Vol. 64, p. 33481,
06/23/99
July 2009
A-5
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Manufacturer3
Sampler
Name
Size
Cut"
Description
FRM or
FEMC
Designation# FRN
Andersen
RAAS-300
PM2.6
Graseby Andersen Model RAAS2.5-300 PM2.6 sampler, similar to RAAS-300
PM10 sampler with a WINS impactor for PM2.6 separation.
FRM
RFPS-0598-120 Vol. 63, p. 31991,
06111198
Thermo Scientific,
Inc.
CAPS
PM2.6
Model 605 Computer Assisted Particle Sampler (CAPS), 24-h integrated. Not
available commercially.
FRM
RFPS-1098-123 Vol. 63, p. 8036,
10129198
Thermo Scientific,
Inc.
RAAS 100-
VSCC
PM2.6
Same as RAAS-100 PM2.6 sampler, but with BGI VSCC, instead of WINS
impactor.
FEM (II)
EQPM-0804-153 Vol. 69, p. 47924,
08106104
Thermo Scientific,
Inc.
RAAS 200-
VSCC
PM2.6
Same as RAAS-200 PM2.6 sampler, but with BGI VSCC instead of WINS
impactor.
FEM (II)
EQPM-0804-154 Vol. 69, p. 47924,
08106104
Thermo Scientific,
Inc.
RAAS 300-
VSCC
PM2.6
Same as RAAS-300 PM2.6 sampler, but with BGI VSCC instead of WINS
impactor.
FEM (II)
EQPM-0804-155 Vol. 69, p. 47925,
08106104
URG Corp.
MASS-100
PM2.6
Model MASS100 PM2.6 sampler with louvered PM10 inlet followed by WINS
impactor, operates at 16.7 L/min; 24-h integrated, volumetric flow measured
by dry test meter at pump outlet modulates pump speed to maintain flow
rate; single channel.
FRM
RFPS-0400-135 Vol. 65, p. 26603,
05108100
URG Corp.
MASS-300
PM2.6
Model MASS300 PM2.6 sampler with louvered PM10 inlet followed by WINS
impactor, operates at 16.7 L/min; 24-h integrated, sequential sampler with
circular tray holding six filters.
FRM
RFPS-0400-136 Vol. 65, p. 26603,
05108100
Tisch Environ-
mental, Inc.
TE-6070
HiVol
PM10
Model TE-6070 PM10 High-Volume Sampler, with TE-6001 PM10 size
selective inlet; 8" x 10" filter holder.
FRM
RFPS-0202-141 Vol. 67, p. 15566,
04102102
Met One
BAM
PM10
Models BAM 1020, GBAM 1020, BAM 1020-1, and GBAM 1020-1, with
BX-802 inlet; glass-fiber filter tape with 1-h filter change frequency.
FEM
EQPM-0798-122 Vol. 63, p. 41253,
08103198
8 BGI Inc.: BGI Incorporated, Waltham, MA. R&P: Rupprecht & Patashnick Company, Inc., Albany, NY, now Thermo Scientific, Inc., Franklin, MA. Andersen: Graseby Andersen, later Andersen
Instruments, Inc., Smyrna, GA, now Thermo Scientific, Inc., Franklin, MA. Thermo Environmental Instruments, Inc., now Thermo Scientific, Inc., Franklin, MA. URG Corp.: URG Corporation, Chapel
Hill, NC. Tisch Environmental, Inc., Cleves, OH. Met One Instruments, Inc., Grants Pass, OR
bThe efficiency of an inlet3 is determined by its 50% cut-point (d50, the diameter at which half of the particles penetrate through the inlet, while the other half is retained by the inlet) and
eFRM: Federal Reference Method; FEM: Federal Equivalent Method. Roman numeral within parenthesis indicates FEM class.
8Particle separation in WINS is achieved by means of a single-jet round nozzle with flow directed into an impaction reservoir. The impaction surface consists of a Gelman Type A/E glass-fiber filter
immersed in 1 mL of Dow Corning (Midland, Ml) 704 diffusion pump oil housed in a reservoir.
Note: The geometric standard deviation (GSD, which is an indicator of the sharpness of the separation, and is derived by the square root of the ratio of particle diameters at penetrations of 16%
and 84%, [d16/d84]0.5).
Source: Chow (1995, 077012); Watson and Chow (2001,157123).
Table A-3. Measurement and analytical specifications for filter analysis of mass, elements, ions, and
carbon.
Observable
Analytical
Accuracy'
Precision11
Minimum Detectable
Limit (MDL)
Interferences
Comparability
Data
Completeness
PM2.6 mass
± 5%'
± 10%4
0.04/yg/m3 cto
~1//gfm3d6'e
Electrostatic charges need to be Within 20% "
neutralized before measurement;
positive (e.g., 0C adsorption)
and negative artifacts (e.g.,
nitrate volatilization)
90 to 100% 0-7
July 2009
A-6
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Observable
Analytical
Accuracy'
Precision
Minimum Detectable
Limit (MDL)
Interferences
Comparability
Data
Completeness
Elements
± 2-5%4
± 10% 4
XRF: 0.4-30 ng/m3 0 8 PIXE: Volatile compounds may evap- 10 to 30% depending 90 to 100%h E
6-360 ng/m3dB ICP/MS:
0.004-25 nglm310 0.05-
11.7 ng/m39'" AAS: 0.02-
7.15 nglm312
orate from filters due to vacuum on species
in XRF and PIXE Potential
contamination during extraction
and incomplete extraction effi-
ciency for ICP-MS and AAS
Matrix interference and peak
overlap may occur on heavily
loaded samples.
Nitrate
± 6% with spiked
± 5 to 10% on repli-
0.06//g/m3 8 to 0.2//g/m3d
Subject to volatilization from
Within 35% and
85 to 100% 0-7
concentrations on
cate analysis4'13'14 co-
1,6,17
Teflon or quartz-fiber filters
probably greater4
Teflon4 and ± 1-14%
located precision ± 5-
on nylon filters13
7%,4',e
Sulfate
±5% 4
±6 to 10% V4'16
0.06 //g/m3" to 0.2 //g/m3 d
1,6,13
n/a
Typically within 10%;
MOUDIs13 to 20%
lower than speciation
samplers4,17,0
85 to 100%
6,7,26,21
Ammonium
±5% 4
± 10% 4
0.06 //g/m3 0 to
0.07//g/m3 d,'e
Subject to volatilization from
Teflon or quartz-fiber filters
Within 30% 4
86 to 100% e'7
OC, EC,TC
± 5% for TC and
OC. No standard
OC: ± 20%
OC: 0.1 //g/m3fto
0.8//g/m3 d
Subject to adsorption (positive
artifact) and volatilization
OC: Within 20 to 50%
86 to 100%8-7
exists to determine
EC accuracy
EC: ± 20%
EC: 0.03//g/m3"to
0.1 //g/m3f
(negative artifact) of organic
gases to and from quartz-fiber
filters
EC: Within 20 to
200%
TC: ± 10% 4
TC: 0.8//g/m3d,'e
TC: Within 20% 4'17'22
Total mass of
DRI Model 2001
DRI Model 2001
DRI Model 2001 Carbon
Extraction efficiency and volume
Within 17% 20
n/a
WSOC
Carbon
Analyzer: ± 5%23
TOA: ± 3-7%24,26
Carbon
Analyzer: ± 10%23
Sunset Carbon
Analyzer: ± 3%2e
TOA: ±5-10% 27
Analyzer: 0.1 ¦ 0.23//g
C/m323
Sunset Carbon Analyzer:
0.05-0.22//g C/m3 20'28
Elemental High TOC II:
0.05//g C/m320
TOA: 0.12//g C/m3 20
reduction steps
Elements in
carbon: 1.5%;
± 2%30
carbon: 0.3//g/m3
Contamination during sample
n/a
n/a
water soluble
hydrogen: 3%;
hydrogen:0.09 //g/m3
drying step
matter: carbon,
nitrogen: 3%; sulfur:
nitrogen: 0.03 //g/m3
hydrogen,
5% 30
sulfur: 0.10 //g/m3 30
nitrogen, and
sulfur
Dissolved organic
n/a
± 5-30%31
0.001 jjg N/m3 while
Concentration of inorganic
Good correlation
n/a
nitrogen
inorganic nitrogen is low; a
0.071 jjg N/m3 while
inorganic nitrogen is high31
nitrogen
between UV and
persulfate oxidation
methods (R2 - 0.87)
31
Neutral polyols
GC/MS: ± 4-8% 32
GC/MS: ± 23% 33'34
GC/MS: Levoglucosan: 10
GCMS: Extraction recovery
IC/PAD: Good
n/a
and polyether
Typically ± 20%,
ng/m340
interfered by sample matrix
correlation
ranged from ± 10
to ± 30%i32'36'30'37'38
HPLC/MS: ± 5-26%39
2.08 ng/m3'31
0.01-0.03 ng/m3 33'41
HPLC/MS: 9-648 pg/m330
Derivatization efficiency
IC/PAD: Overlapping peaks in
chromatogram
(R2 - 0.97) with
HPLC/MS: and
(R2 - 0.89) with
GC/MS Method42
Mono- and
Di-carboxylic
acids
n/a GC/MS: ±5-11% on GC/MS: 0.04-1.12 ng/m3
,in 10:0.01-0.12 nglm347
3 replicates, ± 8 [
avg43,44
IC: ± 10-15%
45
GC/MS: Extraction recovery
interfered by sample matrix
Derivatization efficiency
IC: Overlapping peaks in
chromatogram
GC/MS: Within 50%
for less volatile
compounds40
n/a
July 2009
A-7
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Analytical n . . h Minimum Detectable . „ .Data
Observable . a Precision .. Interferences Comparability
Accuracy Limit (MDL) Completeness
Amino acids n/a ±9%48 1.65-23.6 Derivatization efficiency n/a n/a
P9'm Stability of derivatives
Overlapping peaks in
chromatogram
Mass of humic- n/a n/a 0.083 ng/m3'49 Separation efficiency n/a n/a
like substances
(HULIS)
8 Accuracy is the ability of analytical methods to quantify the observable of a standard reference material correctly; it does not refer to measurement accuracy if no standards available.50
b Refers to precision of co-located measurements, unless specified otherwise
e Based on 1 /vg/filter limit of detection for 24-h samples, assuming a flow rate of 16.7 L/min
d Based on field blanks collected with FRM samplers; /yg/filter converted to /yg/m3 basis assuming a flow rate of 16.7 L/min for 24-h
8Based on h of a 47-mm filter extracted in 15 mL deionized-distilled water (DDW) for 24-h samples, assuming a flow rate of 16.7 L/min
1 Based on 0.2 /yg/cm2 detection limit and 13.8 cm2 deposit area for a 47-mm filter, assuming a flow rate of 16.7 L/min for 24-h
9 Based on 24-h samples at a flow rate of 16.7 L/min and analyzed by XRF
h Except for samples from one FRM sampler at Atlanta Supersite, for which data recovery was 50%7; reason not reported.
'Reported as uncertainty in literature
1 Based on 24-h samples at a flow rate of 16.7 L/min
k Based on 13.8 cm2 deposit area for a 47-mm filter and extracted into a final volume of 200/yL, assuming a flow rate of 16.7 L/min for 24-h and molecular weight of amino acid = 150
' Based on 13.8 cm2 deposit area for a 47-mm filter and extracted into a final volume of 200/yL, assuming a flow rate of 16.7 L/min for 24-h
n/a: Not available
'Chow (1995,077012); 2Watson and Chow (2001,157123);3 Watson et al. (1983, 045084); 4Fehsenfeld et al. (2004,156432); 'Solomon et al. (2001,156993); GMikel (2001,156762); 7Mikel
(2001,156762); 8Watson et al. (1999, 020949); 9Solomon and Sioutas (2006,156995); ,0Graney et al. (2004,053756); "Tanaka et al. (1998,157041); ,2Pancras et al. (2005, 098120); ,3John
et al. (1988,045903); "Hering and Cass (1999, 084958); ,5Fritz et al. (1989,077387); 1GHering et al. (1988,036012); "Solomon et al. (2003,156994); ,8Cabada et al. (2004,148859); 19Fine et
al. (2003,155775); 20Hogrefe et al. (2004, 099003); 2,Drewnick et al. (2003, 099160); 22Watson et al. (2005,157125); 23Ho et al. (2006,156552); 24Decesari et al. (2005,144536); 25Mayol-
Bracero et al. (2002, 045010); 2GYang et al. (2003,156167);21 Tursic et al. (2006,157063); 28Mader et al.(2004,156724); 29Xiao and Liu (2004, 056801); 30Kiss et al. (2002,156646); 3,Cornell
and Jickells (1999,156367);32 Zheng et al. (2002, 026100); 33Fraser et al. (2002,140741);34 Fraser et al. (2003,042231) 35Schauer er al. (1996, 051162); 30Fine et al. (2004); 3JYue et al.
(2004); 38Rinehart et al. (2006,115184); 39Wan and Yu (2006,157104); 40Poore (2000, 012839); 4,Fraser et al. (2003a); 42Engling et al. (2006,156422); 43Yu et al. (2005); 44Tran et al. (2000);
45Yao et al. (2004,102213); 4GLi and Yu (2005,156692); Penning et al. (2003,156539); 48Zhang and Anastasio (2003,157182); 49Emmenegger et al. (2007,156418); 50Watson et al. (1989,
157119)
Source: Chow et al. (2008,156355
Table A-4. Measurement and analytical specifications for filter analysis of organic species.
Organic
Species
Analytical
Accuracy
Precision
MDL
Interferences
TD Solvent
Extraction
TD
Solvent
Extraction
TD
Solvent
Extraction
TD
Solvent
Extraction
Comparability
PAHs
± 2.8-
24.1 %B1
±4.4-
29.4%62
13.8-
26.5%63
± 0.5-
12.9%64
0.05-
4.83%66
Z-score
values 0 to -
1.9 60
± 4-8%32
± 6.5-
22%"
Avg ± 3.2%, Avg ± 8%,
ranged ranged from ± 3.8
from ± 0.05 to to ± 15%6e
±11.5%55 + 23%60 Avg
± 2.6%, ranged
from ± 0.6 to
± 9.5%67
typically
± 20%, ranged
from ± 10 to
± 30%c32*37
0.016-0.48
ng/m3 8 68
0.030-0.45
ng/m3 8 66
0.83-1.66
ng/m3b38
0.033-3.85
ng/m3 b 60
0.01-0.03
ng m ' '
0.76-276
pgfm3b67
Fragmentation of
labile com-
pounds
Possible contami-
nants from solvents
and complicated
extraction
procedures Loss of
volatile compounds
during the ex-
traction and pre-
treatment steps
Possible carryover
from injection port
R2s for solvent
extraction were
0.9 5 68, 0.9 7 66,
and 0.98 60
n-Alkanes
n/a
± 4-8
Avg ± 3.2%,
ranged
from ± 0.05
to ± 11.5%66
± 23%60
Typically ± 20%,
from ± 10
to ± 30%c 32,36 37
0.081-0.86
ng/m3 8 68
0.061-0.97
ng/m3 8 66
0.01-0.03
.3 33,34,37
Same as PAHs Same as PAHs
ng/m3
R2s for solvent
extraction are 0.94
68, and 0.98 66'60
July 2009
A-8
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Analytical
Accuracy
Precision
MDL
Interferences
Hopanes
n/a
n/a
Avg ± 3.2%,
ranged
from ± 0.05
to ± 11.5%66
± 23%6e
Typically ± 20%,
from ± 10
to ± 30%c 32,36 37
0.030-0.14
ng/m3a66
0.83-1.66
ng/m3b38
0.01-0.03
ng/m3 33,41
0.01 ng/m337
Same as PAHs
Same as PAHs
R2s for solvent
extraction are 0.99
66 and 0.998 60
Steranes
n/a
n/a
Avg ± 3.2%,
n/a
0.018-
0.83-1.66
Same as PAHs
Same as PAHs
R2s for solvent
ranged
0.063
ng/m3 b 00
extraction are 0.97
from ± 0.05
ng/m3a66
66 and 0.998 60
to ± 11.5%61
Organic acids
(including n-
alkanoic acids, n-
alkenoic acids,
alkane dicarboxylic
acids, aromatic
carboxylic acids,
resin acids)
n/a
±4-8
± 10
to ± 29%66
± 24%41
± 23%6e
Typically ± 20%,
from ± 10
to ± 30%c 32,36 37
Mono-
carboxylic
acids (C8,
C12, and
C16):
0.79, 2.0,
and 3.2
ng/m3 8 64
0.01-0.03
nq/m3 33,41
Fragmentation of
labile compounds
Loss of polar
species due to
absorption onto
the surface of the
injector
Improper station-
ary phase column
used during TD
analysis
Incomplete ther-
mal desorption of
analytes because
of strong affinity
with filter matrix
Possible conta-
minants from sol-
vents and com-
plicated extraction
procedures
Loss of volatile
compounds during
the extraction and
pretreatment steps
Possible carryover
from injection port
Low derivatization
efficiency
Correlation with
solvent extraction
method
R2 - 0.731 60
Polyols and sugars.
n/a
± 4-8%32
n/a
± 23%56
n/a
Levoglucosa: Same as organic
Same as organic
n/a
including guaiacol
and substituted
Typically ± 20%,
10 ng/m3 01 acids
acids
guaiacols, syringol
from ± 10
2.08 ng/m3b
and substituted
O
l+
GO
O
syringols.
0.01-0.03
anhydrosugars
ng/m3 33,41
8 Assumes 2.9 cm2 filter used in analysis from a deposit area of 13.8 cm2, and sample collection at a flow rate of 16.7 Llmin for 24-h
b Assumes sample collection at a flow rate of 16.7 Llmin for 24-h.
e Reported as uncertainty in literature.
d Assumes a final extract volume of 1 mL and sample collection at a flow rate of 16.7 Llmin for 24-h. nla: Not available
Source: 'Chow (1995,077012); 2Watson and Chow (2001,157123);3 Watson et al. (1983, 045084); "Fehsenfeld et al. (2004,156432); 'Solomon et al. (2001,156993); sMikel (2001,156762);
'Mikel (2001,156762); "Watson et al. (1999,020949); 'Solomon and Sioutas (2006,156995); '"Graney et al. (2004, 053756); "Tanaka et al. (1998,157041); "Pancras et al. (2005,098120);
"John et al. (1988,045903); "Hering and Cass (1999, 084958); "Fritz et al. (1989, 077387); '"Hering et al. (1988, 036012); "Solomon et al. (2003,156994); "Cabada et al. (2004,148859);
"Fine et al. (2003,155775); 20Hogrefe et al. (2004, 099003); 2,Drewnick et al. (2003, 099160); 22Watson et al. (2005,157125); 23Ho et al. (2006,156552); 24Decesari et al. (2005,144536);2S
Mayol-Bracero et al. (2002, 045010); 2sYang et al. 2003;21 Tursic et al. (2006,157063); 2"Mader et al.(2004,156724); 29Xiao and Liu (2004, 056801); 3°Kiss et al. (2002,156646); ''Cornell and
Jickells (1999,156367);32 Zheng et al. (2002, 026100); 33Fraser et al. (2002,140741);34 Fraser et al. (2003, 042231) 3sSchauer er al. (1996, 051162); 3sFine et al. (2004); 3,Yue et al. (2004);
3BRinehart et al. (2006,115184); 39Wan and Yu (2006,157104); 40Poore (2000, 012839); "Fraser et al. (2003a); 42Engling et al. (2006,156422); 43Yu et al. (2005); 44Tran et al. (2000); 4sYao et al.
(2004,102213); 4sLi and Yu (2005,156692); "Henning et al. (2003,156539); 4"Zhang and Anastasio (2003,157182); "Enmenegger et al. (2007,156418); s0(Watson et al., 1989,157119);
"Greaves et al. (1985,156494); "Waterman et al. (2000,157116); s3Waterman et al. (2001,157117); s4Falkovich and Rudich (2001,156427); ssChow et al. (2007,156354); "Miguel et al.
(2004,123260); "Crinmins and Baker (2006, 097008); s"Ho and Yu (2004,156551); s9Jeon et al. (2001,016636); ""Mazzoleni et al. (2007, 098038); s,Poore (2000, 012839); ^Butler et al.
(2003); G3Chow et al. (2006c); "Russell et al. (2004, 082453); ssGrover et al. (2006); "Graver et al. (2005, 090044); "Schwab et al. (2006b); ""Hauck et al. (2004); s9Jaques et al. (2004,
155878); '"Rupprecht and Patashrick (2003,157207); "Pang et al (2002, 030353); "Eatough et al. (2001,010303); ,3Lee et al. (2005,128139); ,4Lee et al. (2005,156680); ,sBabich et al.
(2000,156239);; ,sLee et al. (2005c); "Lee et al. (2005,128139); "Anderson and Ogren (1998,156213); ,9Chung et al. (2001,156357); ""Kidwell and Ondov (2004,155898); "'Litt^ow et al.
(2004,126616); ""Weber et al. (2003,157129); "'Harrison et al. (2004); "Rattigan et al. (2006,115897); "sWittig et al. (2004,103413); ""Vaughn et al. (2005,157089); "'Chow et al. (2005,
099030); ""Weber et al (2001,024640); ""Schwab et al. (2006a); "°Lim et al. (2003,156697); "'Watson and Chow (2002, 037873); ""Venkatachari et al. (2006,105918); '"Bae et al. (2004a);
"Arhami et al. (2006,156224); "'Park et al. (2005,156843); ""Bae et al. (2004b); "Chow et al. (2006a); ""Arnott et al. (2005); ""Bond et al. (1999); '""Virkkula et al. (2005,157097); '"'Petzold et
al. (2002,156863); ™Park et al. (2006); "3Arnott et al. (1999, 020650); '"Peters et al. (2001); '"'Pitchford et al. (1997,156872); '""Rees et al. (2004, 097164); '"'Watson et al. (2000); '""Lee et
al. (2005,156680); '""Hering et al. (2004,155837); ""Watson et al. (1998); "'Chakrabarti et al. (2004); "2Mathai et al. (1990,156741); '"Kidwell and Ondov (2001, 017092); '"Stanier et al.
(2004); '"Khlystov et al. (2005,156635); ""Takahama et al. (2004,157038); "'Chow et al. (2005,156348); ""Zhang et al. (2002); ""Subramanian et al. (2004, 081203); ,2°Chow et al. (2006b);
"'Birch and Cary (1996); ,22Birch (1998, 024953); ,23Birch and Cary (1996); ""NIOSH (1996,156810); "sNI0SH (1999,156811); ""Chow et al. (1993); "'Chow et al. (2007); ""Ellis and Novakov
(1982,156416); ""Peterson and Richards (2002,156861); ""Schauer et al. (2003); "'Middlebrook et al. (2003, 042932); ,32Wenzel et al. (2003,157139); "3Jimenez et al. (2003); ,34Phares et al.
(2003,156866); "sQin and Prather (2006,156895); ""Zhang et al. (2005); "'Bein et al. (2005,156265); ""Drewnick et al. (2004a); ""Drewnick et al. (2004b); ""Lake et al. (2003,156669);
"'Lake et al. (2004,088411)
July 2009
A-9
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table A-5. Measurement and analytical specifications for continuous mass and mass surrogate
instruments.
Instrument and
Measurement Principle
Averaging
Time
Analytical „ . . h
Precision
Accuracy
MDL
Data
Interferences Comparability „ , .
Completeness
INERTIA INSTRUMENTS
TEOM Air is drawn through a size- 10 min-24
selective inlet onto the filter mounted h
on an oscillating hollow tube. The
oscillation frequency changes with
mass loading on the filter, which is
used to calculate mass concentration
by calibrating measured frequency
with standards.
loss of semi-
volatile species
± 0.75%c ± 5//g/m for 0.01//g, which is Loses semi-volatile Underestimated 99% to 92%
10-minavgcd 0.06//g/m3for 1-h species at both FRM mass by 20 6
±1.5//g/m3for av9c 30°Cand50°C. to 35% 02 «
1-h avgc-'
SESTE0M, while
less sensitive to
relative humidity,
does not com-
Dletelv eliminate
FDMSTE0M. A self-referencing 1-h - 24 h ± 0.75%c < 1O%06
TEOM with a filter at 4 °C that
accounts for volatile species. It is
equipped with a diffusion Nafion
dryer to remove particle-bound water.
The Teflon (PTFE)-coated borosilicate
glass-fiber filter that is maintained at
4 °C removes particles during the
reference flow cycle. The flow
alternates between a base and refer-
ence flow every 6 min. If a negative
mass is measured during the
reference flow, due to loss of
volatiles from the filter, it is added to
the mass made during the prior parti-
cle-laden samples to obtain total
PM2.6 concentration.
0.01 //g, which is n/a 9 to 30% higher 95 to 99%06'08
0.06//g/m3 than FRM mass 57 to 65%07
for 1-h avgc Within 10% of
mass by D- TEOM,
PC- BOSS, RAMS
and BAM ee'07
Differential Tapered Element 1-h - 24 h ± 0.75%c < 10%Be6'e9'70 0.01 //g, or n/a Within 10% of 86%®
Oscillating Microbalance (D-TEOM) 0.06//g/m3 for 1-h FDMS-TEOM 06 00
Similar to FDMS, but an electrostatic av9
precipitator is used in place of the
glass-fiber filter to remove particles
during the 6 min reference flow cycle.
RAMS 10 min-24
A TEOM with a cyclone inlet, dif- ^
fusion denuders, and Nafion dryer.
Particles are collected on a "sand-
wich" filter (Teflon followed by car-
bon-impregnated glass-fiber filter) on
the tapered oscillating element. The
various denuders remove gas phase
organic compounds, nitric acid, sulfur
dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, ammonia,
and ozone, which could otherwise be
adsorbed by the TEOM filter.
n/a < 10%f71 ± 1 to 2 //g/m3 for
30-min avg 72
n/a 10 to 20% higher n/a
than avg®72FRM
mass73'74
July 2009
A-10
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Instrument and
Measurement Principle
Averaging
Time
Analytical „ . . h
Precision
Accuracy
MDL
Data
Interferences Comparability „ , .
Completeness
PRESSURE DROP INSTRUMENT
Continuous Ambient Mass Monitor 1 -h — 24 h
(CAMM)
Air is drawn through a Teflon-
membrane filter tape and the pressure
drop across the filter is monitored
continuously. The proportion of
pressure drop to aerosol loading is
related to the PM concentration. The
filter tape advances every 30-60 min
to minimize volatilization and ad-
sorption artifacts during sampling.
n/a
28.1% for 1-h
avg
15.9% for 24-h
avg
(~ 3.5 //g/m3)
< 5 //g/m3 for 1 h
avg 76
Needs effective
sealing for good
performance; even
slight leaks may
result in highly
variable baseline.
Probably less
sensitive than D-
TEOMor RAMS.
Varied perfor-
mance: within 2%
of SES-TEOMand
FRM at Houston,
TX, while not
correlated with D-
TEOMor FRM at
Rubidoux, OA.76"
n/a
BA TTENUA TION INSTRUMENT
B Attenuation Monitor (BAM)
B rays electrons) are passed through
a quartz-fiber filter tape on which
particles are collected. The loss of
electrons (B attenuation) caused by
the particle loading on the filter is
converted to mass concentration,
after subtraction of blank filter
attenuation.
1-h-24 h
± 3 //g for ±2//g/m3c'h
5/yg/m3 for 1-h avg1 Water absorption
Up to 30% higher
24-h avg
by particles may
than FRM mass
concentrations
result in higher
and within 2% of
< 100/yg/m3
mass measure-
FDMS-TEOM 03'07
and 2% for 100
ments; maybe
to 1,000/yg/m3
important at RH
± 8/yg
>85%
< 100/yg/m3
and 8% for 100
to 1000/yg/m3
(1-h
93 to 99%e'e6'07
LIGHT SCA TTERING INSTRUMENT
Nephelometers (including DustTrak)
A light source illuminates the sample
air and the scattered light is detected
at an angle (usually 90°) relative to
the source. The signal is related to
the concentration of the particles
giving an estimate of the particle light
scattering coefficient. Zero air
calibrations can be performed using
particle-free air.
5 min - 24
h
n/a
Nephelometers:
< 5% for TSI
and NGNi
nephelometers
78,79
DustTrak:
Greater of 0.1%
or 1 /yg/m3c'h
Nephelometer:
< 1.5 Mm-1
DustTrak: ± 1 //g|m3
for 24-h avg'
Conversion factor
to calculate mass
concentration from
bscat may vary
depending on
particle size, shape
and composition.
Light scattering by
DustTrak propor-
tional to dp 6 for
dp < 0.25/ym 70
Typically good
correlation with
SES-TEOM and D-
TEOM (R2
>0.80).
Comparability
depends on
conversion factor
used.
>80 to 98% for
NGN2, RR-M903
and GreenTek
Nephelometers6
>80% for
DustTrak 006 to
98% for GRIMM
optical particle
counter06
July 2009
A-11
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Instrument and Averaging Analytical n . . h „ .... Data
. „ . . , . a Precision MDL Interferences Comparability -
Measurement Principle Time Accuracy _ Completeness
a Accuracy is the ability of analytical methods to quantify the observable of a standard reference material correctly; does not refer to measurement accuracy, since no standards available,
b Refers to precision of co-located measurements, unless specified otherwise,
c Manufacturer-specified measurement parameter.
d Details not available on how the precision was obtained and whether it refers to co-located precision,
e Includes a combination of estimates: based on co-located precision and based on regression slopes,
f Co-located precision with respect to PC-BOSS reconstructed PM2.5 mass,
g Using glass-fiber "sandwich" filter,
h Specified as "resolution" by the manufacturer.
i Co-located precision estimate based on regression slope for NGN nephelometer (slope = 1.01, intercept = -1.04/yglm3, R2 = 0.99).
j Specified as "Zero stability" by the manufacturer,
nla: Not available.
Source: 'Chow (1995,077012): 2Watson and Chow (2001,157123);3 Watson et al. (1983, 045084); "Fehsenfeld et al. (2004,150432); 'Solomon et al. (2001,150993); sMikel (2001,150702);
'Mikel (2001,150702); "Watson et al. (1999,020949); 'Solomon and Sioutas (2000,150995); "Graney et al. (2004, 053750); "Tanaka et al. (1998,157041); "Pancras et al. (2005,098120);
"John et al. (1988,045903); "Hering and Cass (1999, 084958); "Fritz et al. (1989, 077387); '"Hering et al. (1988, 030012); "Solomon et al. (2003,150994); "Cabada et al. (2004,148859);
"Fine et al. (2003,155775); 2°Hogrefe et al. (2004, 099003); 2,Drewnick et al. (2003, 099100); 22Watson et al. (2005,157125); 23Ho et al. (2000,150552); 24Decesari et al. (2005,144530);2S
Mayol-Bracero et al. (2002, 045010); 2sYang et al. 2003;21 Tursic et al. (2000,157003); 2"Mader et al.(2004,150724); 29Xiao and Liu (2004, 050801); 30Kiss et al. (2002,150040); 3,Cornell and
Jickells (1999,150307);32 Zheng et al. (2002, 020100); 33Fraser et al. (2002,140741);34 Fraser et al. (2003, 042231) 3sSchauer er al. (1990, 051102); 3sFine et al. (2004); 3,Yue et al. (2004);
3BRinehart et al. (2000,115184); 39Wan and Yu (2000,157104); 40Poore (2000, 012839); "Fraser et al. (2003a); 42Engling et al. (2000,150422); 43Yu et al. (2005); 44Tran et al. (2000); 4sYao et al.
(2004,102213); 4sLi and Yu (2005,150092); "Henning et al. (2003,150539); 4"Zhang and Anastasio (2003,157182); "Enmenegger et al. (2007,150418); s0(Watson et al., 1989,157119);
"Greaves et al. (1985,150494); "Waterman et al. (2000,157110); s3Waterman et al. (2001,157117); s4Falkovich and Rudich (2001,150427); ssChow et al. (2007,150354); "Miguel et al.
(2004,123200); "Crinmins and Baker (2000, 097008); s"Ho and Yu (2004,150551); s9Jeon et al. (2001,010030); 60Mazzoleni et al. (2007, 098038); 6,Poore (2000, 012839); ^Butler et al.
(2003); s3Chow et al. (2000c); "Russell et al. (2004, 082453); ssGrover et al. (2000); ssGrover et al. (2005, 090044); "Schwab et al. (2000b); ""Hauck et al. (2004); s9Jaques et al. (2004,
155878); '"Rupprecht and Patashrick (2003,157207); "Pang et al (2002, 030353); "Eatough et al. (2001,010303); ,3Lee et al. (2005,128139); ,4Lee et al. (2005,150080); ,sBabich et al.
(2000,150239); ,sLee et al. (2005c); "Lee et al. (2005,128139); '"Anderson and Ogren (1998,150213); ,9Chung et al. (2001,150357); ""Kidwell and Ondov (2004,155898); "'Lithgow et al.
(2004,120010); ""Weber et al. (2003,157129); "'Harrison et al. (2004); "Rattigan et al. (2000,115897); "sWittig et al. (2004,103413); ""Vaughn et al. (2005,157089); "'Chow et al. (2005,
099030); ""Weber et al (2001,024040); ""Schwab et al. (2000a); "°Lim et al. (2003,150097); "'Watson and Chow (2002,037873); ""Venkatachari et al. (2000,105918); "3Bae et al. (2004a);
"Arhami et al. (2000,150224); "'Park et al. (2005,150843).
Table A-6. Measurement and analytical specifications for continuous elements.
Instrument and
Measurement Averaging Time
Principle
Analytical
Accuracy3
Precision
MDL
Interferences Comparability
Data
Completeness
Semi-continuous
Elements in Aerosol
System (SEAS)
Particles are
collected at 30-min
interval for
subsequent
laboratory atomic
absorption analysis
for elements.
Aerosol collection is
through
condensational
growth by direct
steam injection.
The grown particles
are separated from
the airstream using
virtual impactor.
The droplets
accumulate in a
slurry that is
pumped to a
separate sample
vial for each time
period.
15-30 min
± 10%b for Mn, 20 to 43%c8°
Al: 440 pg
Spectral
Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Se,
Cr: 6.7 pg
interferences limit
Cd, and Sb
Mn: 9.9 pg
the number of
± 20%bfor Cr, As,
Fe: 85 pg
elements detected
and Pb 80
Ni: 42 pg
simultaneously
Cu: 26 pg
Zn: 43 pg
As: 27 pg
Se: 33 pg
Cd: 3.2 pg
Sb 160 pg
Pb: 31 pg80
n; a
n/a
July 2009
A-12
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Instrument and
Measurement Averaging Time
Principle
Analytical
Accuracy3
Precision
MDL
Interferences Comparability
Data
Completeness
Laser-Induced
Breakdown
Spectroscopy
(LIBS)
Used for in-situ
single particle
analysis. A high-
power pulsed laser
is projected into
particles producing
high-temperature
plasma. Photons
emission from
relaxing atoms in
the excited states
provides
characteristics of
individual elements.
A few seconds
n/a
n/a
Na: 143 fg
Mg: 53 fg
Al: 184 fg
Ca: 50 fg
Cr: 166 fg
Mn: 176 fg
Cu: 15 fg81
n/a
n/a
n/a
8 Accuracy is the ability of analytical methods to quantify the observable of a standaid reference material correctly; does not refer to measurement accuracy, since no standards are available.
b Based on analysis of standard reference material (SRM) 1643d from National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
c Based on error propagation,
n/a: Not available
Source: ""(Kidwell and Ondov, 2004,155898); "'(Lithgow et al., 2004,126616).
Table A-7. Measurement and analytical specifications for continuous NO3.
Instrument and Measurement Averaging Analytical
Principle Time Accuracy
Precision
MDL
Interferences Comparability
Data
Completion
FLASH VOLA TIZA TION INSTRUMENTS
Aerosol Dynamics Inc. continuous nitrate
analyzer (ADIN)
Particle collection by humidification and
impaction followed by flash volatilization and
detection of the evolved gases in a
chemiluminescent NOx analyzer.
10 min
n/a
n/a
0.1 /yg/m3 for
10-min avg 82
n/a
Within 30% of filter
and continuous NO3 -
. See Weber et al.82
for details.
93%7
Rupprecht and Patashnick continuous nitrate
analyzer (R&P-8400N)
Particle collection by impaction followed by
flash volatilization and detection of the
evolved gases in a chemiluminescent NOx
analyzer. A carbon honeycomb denuder,
installed at the inlet to the Nafion humidifier
removes nitric acid and ammonia vapor.
10 min
n/a
6.3%-23%b
0.17 to
0.3 /yg/m3for
24-h avg 83'84
0.24/yg/m3 to
0.45/yg/m3 for
10-min avg
Conversion and
volatilization efficiency
appears to depend on
ambient composition;
extent of underestimation
increases with higher
concentrations.84,80
20 to 45% lower
than filter NOs"20'82"
85,87
>80 to
>94%w
July 2009
A-13
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Instrument and Measurement Averaging Analytical „ Data
„ . . . . Precision MDL Interferences Comparability „ , ..
Principle Time Accuracy _ Completion
DENUDERDIFFERENCE INSTRUMENT
Atmospheric Research and Analysis nitrate
analyzer (ARAN)
Sampled air passes through a 350°C
molybdenum (Mo) mesh that converts
particulate nitrate into NO. A pre-split stream
with a Teflon filter installed upstream of an
identical converter (i.e., particle-free air) is
used as a reference. NO in both streams is
quantified by chemiluminescence and their
difference determines the particulate nitrate
concentration. The instrument inlet contains a
potassium iodide- coated denuder to remove
HNOs and NO?.
30 sec
n/a
n/a
0.5/yg/m3 for
30-sec avg 82
n/a
Within 30% of filter
and continuous NO3 -
. See Weber et al.82
for details.
76%7
SAMPLE DISSOLUTION FOLLOWED BY IC ANAL YSIS INSTRUMENTS
Energy Research Center of the Netherlands
(EON) 10-based ion analyzer Oollects particles
into water drops using a steam jet aerosol
collector, via cyclone. The combined flow from
collected droplets containing dissolved aerosol
components and wall steam condensate is
directed to an anion 10 for analysis of nitrate.
Interfering gases are pre-removed by a rotating
wet annular denuder system.
1-h
n/a
n/a
0.1//g/m3
n/a
Within 30% of filter
and continuous NO3 -
. See Weber et al.82
for details.
100%7
Texas Tech University (TT) ion analyzer
Particles in the sample stream are processed
through a cyclone and a parallel plate wet
denuder, then collected alternatively on one of
two 2.5 cm pre-washed glass fiber filters for a
period of 15 min. The particles on the freshly
sampled filter are automatically extracted for
6.5 min with water and analyzed for nitrate by
IC.
15-30 min n/a
n/a
0.010//g/m3 n/a
Within 30% of filter
and continuous NO3 -
. See Weber et al.82
for details.
97%7
Particle into Liquid Sampler-Ion 1h n/a 10%-15%c 0.05 to Consistent water quality Within 10% of nylon- 65 to 70%2°
Chromatography (PILS-IC) 7'82'88 0.1 //g/m3 is essential for good filter NO3 - and 37%
Ambient particles are mixed with saturated 2°'82'88 Precision- higher than R&P-
o4nni\i 20
water vapor to produce droplets collected by
impaction. The resulting liquid stream is
analyzed with an IC to quantify aerosol ionic
components.
Dionex-IC The gas-denuded air stream enters 1-h n/a 14%de6 n/a Consistent water quality Bias of < 10% n/a
the annular channel of a concentric nozzle, is essential for good relative to filter NO3
where deionized water generates a spray that precision. -0E
entrains the particles. The flow is then drawn
through a 0.5//m pore size PTFE filter. The
remaining solution is aspirated by a peristaltic
pump and sent to IC for ion analysis.
Ambient Ion Monitor (AIM; Model 9000) Air is 1-h n/a n/a 0.1 //g/m3 for n/a n/a n/a
drawn through a size-selective inlet into a li- 1-h avg9
quid diffusion denuder where interfering gases
are removed. The stream enters a super-
saturation chamber where the resulting
droplets are collected through impaction. The
collected particles and a fraction of the
condensed water are accumulated until the
particles can be injected into IC for hourly
analysis.
July 2009
A-14
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Instrument and Measurement Averaging Analytical „ Data
„ . . . . Precision MDL Interferences Comparability „ , ..
Principle Time Accuracy _ Completion
PARTICLE MASS SPECTROMETER INSTRUMENT
Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS) A few
Air stream is drawn through an aerodynamic secon[
lens and focused into a beam in a vacuum
chamber. This aerosol beam is chopped by a
mechanical chopper and the flight time of the
particles through a particle-sizing chamber is
determined by the time-resolved mass
spectrometer measurement. The particle
impacts onto a 600 °C heated plate where it
decomposes and is analyzed by a quadruple
mass spectrometer. The nitrate ion, along with
other ions, is detected by the mass
spectrometer.
8 Accuracy is the ability of analytical methods to quantify the observable of a standaid reference material correctly; does not refer to measurement accuracy, since no standards are available.
b Overall uncertainty estimated by error propagation.
c Uncertainty estimated from uncertainties in flow rates and calibrations; does not refer to co-located precision.
d Co-located precision with respect to PC-BOSS PM2.5 total particulate NO3 (the sum of the denuded front filter [non-volatilized NO3-] and HN03-absorbing backup filter [volatilized NO3]).
e Manufacturer specified measurement parameter
nla: Not available.
Source: 'Chow (1995,077012); 2Watson and Chow (2001,157123);3 Watson et al. (1983, 045084); "Fehsenfeld et al. (2004,150432); 'Solomon et al. (2001,150993); sMikel (2001,150702);
'Mikel (2001,150702); "Watson et al. (1999,020949); 'Solomon and Sioutas (2000,150995); '"Graney et al. (2004, 053750); "Tanaka et al. (1998,157041); "Pancras et al. (2005,098120);
"John et al. (1988,045903); "Hering and Cass (1999, 084958); "Fritz et al. (1989, 077387); '"Hering et al. (1988, 030012); "Solomon et al. (2003,150994); '"Cabada et al. (2004,148859);
"Fine et al. (2003,155775); 2"Hogrefe et al. (2004, 099003); 2'Drewnick et al. (2003, 099100); 22Watson et al. (2005,157125); 23Ho et al. (2000,150552); 24Decesari et al. (2005,144530);2S
Mayol-Bracero et al. (2002, 045010); 2syang et al. 2003;21 Tursic et al. (2000,157003); 2"Mader et al.(2004,150724); 29Xiao and Liu (2004, 050801); 3"Kiss et al. (2002,150040); ''Cornell and
Jickells (1999,150307);32 Zheng et al. (2002, 020100); 33Fraser et al. (2002,140741);34 Fraser et al. (2003, 042231) 3sSchauer er al. (1990, 051102); 3sFine et al. (2004); 3,yue et al. (2004);
3BRinehart et al. (2000,115184); 39Wan and yu (2000,157104); 40Poore (2000, 012839); "Fraser et al. (2003a); 42Engling et al. (2000,150422); 43yu et al. (2005); 44Tran et al. (2000); 4iTao et al.
(2004,102213); 4sLi and yu (2005,150092); "Henning et al. (2003,150539); 4"Zhang and Anastasio (2003,157182); "Enmenegger et al. (2007,150418); s0(Watson et al., 1989,157119);
"Greaves et al. (1985,150494); "Waterman et al. (2000,157110); s3Waterman et al. (2001,157117); s4Falkovich and Rudich (2001,150427); ssChow et al. (2007,150354); "Miguel et al.
(2004,123200); "Crinmins and Baker (2000, 097008); s"Ho and yu (2004,150551); s9Jeon et al. (2001,010030); 60Mazzoleni et al. (2007, 098038); 6,Poore (2000, 012839); ^Butler et al.
(2003); G3Chow et al. (2000c); "Russell et al. (2004, 082453); ssGrover et al. (2000); "Graver et al. (2005, 090044); "Schwab et al. (2000b); ""Hauck et al. (2004); s9Jaques et al. (2004,
155878); '"Rupprecht and Patashrick (2003,157207); "Pang et al (2002, 030353); ,2Eatough et al. (2001,010303); ,3Lee et al. (2005,128139); ,4Lee et al. (2005,150080); ,sBabich et al.
(2000,150239); ,sLee et al. (2005c); "Lee et al. (2005,128139); '"Anderson and Ogren (1998,150213); ,9Chung et al. (2001,150357); ""Kidwell and Ondov (2004,155898); "'Lithgow et al.
(2004,120010); ""Weber et al. (2003,157129); "'Harrison et al. (2004); "Rattigan et al. (2000,115897); "sWittig et al. (2004,103413); ""Vaughn et al. (2005,157089); "'Chow et al. (2005,
099030); ""Weber et al (2001,024040); ""Schwab et al. (2000a); "°Lim et al. (2003,150097); "'Watson and Chow (2002,037873); ""Venkatachari et al. (2000,105918); 93Bae et al. (2004a);
"Arhami et al. (2000,150224); "'Park et al. (2005,150843); ""Bae et al. (2004b); "Chow et al. (2000a); ""Arnott et al. (2005); ""Bond et al. (1999); '""Virkkula et al. (2005,157097); '"'Petzold et
al. (2002,150803); ,02Park et al. (2000); "3Arnott et al. (1999, 020050); '"Peters et al. (2001); '"'Pitchford et al. (1997,150872); '""Rees et al. (2004, 097104); '"'Watson et al. (2000); '""Lee et
al. (2005,150080); '""Hering et al. (2004,155837); ""Watson et al. (1998); "'Chakrabarti et al. (2004); "2Mathai et al. (1990,150741); '"Kidwell and Ondov (2001, 017092); '"Stanier et al.
(2004); "sKhlystov et al. (2005,150035); ""Takahama et al. (2004,157038); "'Chow et al. (2005,150348); ""Zhang et al. (2002); ""Subramanian et al. (2004, 081203); ,2°Chow et al. (2000b);
"'Birch and Cary (1990); ,22Birch (1998, 024953); ,23Birch and Cary (1990); ""NIOSH (1990,150810); "sNI0SH (1999,150811); ""Chow et al. (1993); "'Chow et al. (2007); ""Ellis and Novakov
(1982,150410); ""Peterson and Richards (2002,150801); ""Schauer et al. (2003); "'Middlebrook et al. (2003, 042932); ,32Wenzel et al. (2003,157139); "3Jimenez et al. (2003); ,34Phares et al.
(2003,150800); "sQin and Prather (2000,150895); ""Zhang et al. (2005); "'Bein et al. (2005,150205); ""Drewnick et al. (2004a); ""Drewnick et al. (2004b); ""Lake et al. (2003,150009);
"'Lake et al. (2004,088411).
n/a n/a 0.03/yg/m Subject to interferences Within 10% of nylon- 94 to 98%
from fragments of other filter NO3 -, and
species with mass to within 15% of PILS-
charge ratio in the same IC and 30% of R&P-
range as fragments of 8400N20
nitrate. Highly refractory
materials are not
detected.
Table A-8. Measurement and analytical specifications for continuous SO42 .
Instrument and Measurement Principle Averaging Analytical precjsjon |\/|Q|_ Interferences Comparability „ ",ata
_ Time Accuracy _ Completeness
FLASH VOLA TILIZA TION INSTRUMENTS
Aerosol Dynamics, Inc. continuous sulfate analyzer (ADI- 10 min
S)
Particle collection by impaction followed by flash
volatilization and detection of the evolved gases by a UV-
fluorescence SO2 analyzer.
n/a n/a 0.4/yg/m n/a Within 15% of 100%
82 filter and
continuous
S042"
See Weber et al.
82 for details
July 2009
A-15
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Instrument and Measurement Principle
Averaging Analytical
Time Accuracy'
Precision MDL Interferences Comparability
Data
Completeness
Rupprecht and Patashnick continuous sulfate analyzer
(R&P-8400S)
Particle collection by impaction followed by flash
volatilization and detection of the evolved gases by a UV-
fluorescence SO2 analyzer. An activated carbon denuder
at the inlet to the Nafion humidifier removes SO2.
10 min
n/a
25% on avg
< 15% at
conc.
>9/yg/m3
and >30%
at conc.
< 2/yg/m3
0.48 /yg/m3
S042 to SO2
conversion and
volatilization
efficiency appears
to depend on
ambient
composition 84
10 to 30% lower
than filter SO42'
84 to
95%0'20'21'8
THERMAL REDUCTION INSTRUMENTS
Continuous Ambient Sulfate Monitor (CASM) Sampled air 15 min
passes through a NayCO:; coated annular denuder to
remove ambient SO2 and is subsequently split into
independent sample and filter flows. The sample flow
passes through a quartz tube containing a stainless steel
rod maintained at 1000 °C that reduces sulfate to SO2.
The flow then passes through a PTFE filter and into a
trace-level SO2 fluorescence analyzer.
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Up to 25% lower
than filter SO42'
and within 6% of
R&P8400S, PILS-
IC andAMS20'21
80 to 98%20-21
Thermo Electron Model 5020 sulfate particulate analyzer 15 min
(TE-5020)
The commercial version of CASM, with slight changes in
the sample flow path.
n/a
< 10% c8
0.3/yg/m3
for 24-h
avg 80
0.5/yg/m3
for 15-min
avgd
S042 to SO
conversion
efficiency
on ambient
composition
-20% lower 88 to 9O%80
than filter SO42'80
SAMPLE DISSOLUTION FOLLOWED BY IC ANAL YSIS INSTRUMENTS
Energy Research Center of the Netherlands (ECN) IC-
based ion analyzer
Entrains particles into water drops using the steam jet
aerosol collector. The drops are collected using a cyclone
and the combined flow from collected droplets containing
dissolved aerosol components and wall steam
condensate is directed to an anion IC for analysis of
sulfate. Interfering gases are pre-removed by a rotating
wet annular denuder system.
1-h
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Within 15% of
filter and
continuous SO42'
See Weber et al.
82 for details.
100%7
Texas Tech University (TT) ion analyzer
Particles in the sample stream, after being processed
through a cyclone and a parallel plate wet denuder, are
collected alternatively on one of two 2.5 cm pre-washed
glass fiber filters for a period of 15 min. The particles on
the freshly sampled filter are automatically extracted for
6.5 min with water and analyzed for sulfate by IC.
30 min
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Within 15% of
filter and
continuous SO42'
See Weber et al.
82 for details.
100%7
Particle into Liquid Sampler-Ion Chromatography (PILS-
IC)
Ambient particles are mixed with saturated water vapor
to produce droplets collected by impaction. The resulting
liquid stream is analyzed with an IC to quantify aerosol
ionic components.
1-h
n/a
10%-15%B
0.1 to
O.'Vg/m3
Consistent water
quality is essential
for good precision.
Within 30% of
filter and other
continuous SO42'
65 to 7O%20-21
~ionex-IC
The gas-denuded air stream enters the annular channel of
a concentric nozzle, where deionized water generates a
spray that entrains the particles. The flow is then drawn
through a 0.5/ym pore size PTFE filter. The remaining
solution is aspirated by a peristaltic pump and sent to IC
for ion analysis.
1-h n/a 11 %f06 n/a Consistent water Within 10% of
quality is essential filter SO42'86
for good precision.
n/a
July 2009
A-16
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Instrument and Measurement Principle
Averaging Analytical
Time Accuracy'
Precision MDL Interferences Comparability
Data
Completeness
Ambient Ion Monitor (AIM; Model 9000)
Air is drawn through a size-selective inlet into a liquid
diffusion denuder where interfering gases are removed.
The stream enters a super saturation chamber where the
resulting droplets are collected through impaction. The
collected particles and a fraction of the condensed water
are accumulated until the particles can be injected into IC
for hourly analysis.
1-h
n/a
n/a
0.1 /yg/m3
for 1-h
avgd
n/a
n/a
n/a
PARTICLE MASS SPECTROMETER
Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS)
Airstream is drawn through an aerodynamic lens and
focused into a beam in a vacuum chamber. This aerosol
beam is chopped by a mechanical chopper and the flight
time of the particles through a particle-sizing chamber is
determined by the time-resolved mass spectrometer
measurement. The particle impacts onto a 600 °C
heated plate where it decomposes and is analyzed by a
quadruple mass spectrometer. The sulfate ion, along with
other ions, is detected by the mass spectror
A few
seconds
n/a
n/a
n/a
Subject to
Up to 30% lower 93 to 98%20-21
interferences from
than filter SO42'
fragments of other
and within 5% of
species with mass
R&P8400S, PILS-
to charge ratio in
IC and CASM 20'21
the same range as
fragments of
sulfate. Highly
refractory
materials are not
detected.
8 Accuracy is the ability of analytical methods to quantify the observable of a standaid reference material correctly; does not refer to measurement accuracy, since no standards available.
b Overall uncertainty estimated by error propagation.
c Co-located precision estimate based on regression slope (slope = 0.95, intercept = 0.01 to 0.2, R2 > 0.98).
d Manufacturer specified measurement parameter.
e Uncertainty estimated from uncertainties in flow rates and calibrations; does not refer to co-located precision,
f Co-located precision with respect to PC-BOSS PM2.5 SO42
n/a: Not available
Source: 'Chow (1995,077012); 2Watson and Chow (2001,157123);3 Watson et al. (1983, 045084); "Fehsenfeld et al. (2004,156432); 'Solomon et al. (2001,156993); sMikel (2001,156762);
'Mikel (2001,156762); "Watson et al. (1999,020949); 'Solomon and Sioutas (2006,156995); ,0Graney et al. (2004, 053756); "Tanaka et al. (1998,157041); "Pancras et al. (2005,098120);
"John et al. (1988,045903); "Hering and Cass (1999, 084958); "Fritz et al. (1989, 077387); '"Hering et al. (1988, 036012); "Solomon et al. (2003,156994); '"Cabada et al. (2004,148859);
"Fine et al. (2003,155775); 2°Hogrefe et al. (2004, 099003); ''Drewnick et al. (2003, 099160); 22Watson et al. (2005,157125); 23Ho et al. (2006,156552); 24Decesari et al. (2005,144536);2S
Mayol-Bracero et al. (2002, 045010); 2"yang et al. 2003;21 Tursic et al. (2006,157063); 2"Mader et al.(2004,156724); 29Xiao and Liu (2004, 056801); "Kiss et al. (2002,156646); ''Cornell and
Jickells (1999,156367);32 Zheng et al. (2002, 026100); 33Fraser et al. (2002,140741);34 Fraser et al. (2003, 042231) 3sSchauer er al. (1996, 051162); 3sFine et al. (2004); 3,yue et al. (2004);
"Rinehart et al. (2006,115184); 39Wan and yu (2006,157104); 40Poore (2000, 012839); "Fraser et al. (2003a); 42Engling et al. (2006,156422); 43yu et al. (2005); 44Tran et al. (2000); 4syao et al.
(2004,102213); 4sLi and yu (2005,156692); "Henning et al. (2003,156539); 4"Zhang and Anastasio (2003,157182); "Enmenegger et al. (2007,156418); s0(Watson et al., 1989,157119);
"Greaves et al. (1985,156494); "Waterman et al. (2000,157116); s3Waterman et al. (2001,157117); s4Falkovich and Rudich (2001,156427); ssChow et al. (2007,156354); "Miguel et al.
(2004,123260); "Crinmins and Baker (2006, 097008); s"Ho and yu (2004,156551); s9Jeon et al. (2001,016636); "Mazzoleni et al. (2007, 098038); s,Poore (2000, 012839); ^Butler et al.
(2003); "3Chow et al. (2006c); "Russell et al. (2004, 082453); ssGrover et al. (2006); "Graver et al. (2005, 090044); "Schwab et al. (2006b); "Hauck et al. (2004); s9Jaques et al. (2004,
155878); '"Rupprecht and Patashrick (2003,157207); "Pang et al (2002, 030353); "Eatough et al. (2001,010303); ,3Lee et al. (2005,128139); ,4Lee et al. (2005,156680); ,sBabich et al.
(2000,156239); ,sLee et al. (2005c); "Lee et al. (2005,128139); '"Anderson and Ogrend998,156213); ,9Chung et al. (2001,156357); "Kidwell and Ondov (2004,155898); "'Litt^ow et al.
(2004,126616); ""Weber et al. (2003,157129); "'Harrison et al. (2004); "Rattigan et al. (2006,115897); "sWittig et al. (2004,103413); ""Vaughn et al. (2005,157089); "'Chow et al. (2005,
099030); ""Weber et al (2001,024640); ""Schwab et al. (2006a); "Lim et al. (2003,156697); "'Watson and Chow (2002,037873); ""Venkatachari et al. (2006,105918); 93Bae et al. (2004a);
"Arhami et al. (2006,156224); ^Park et al. (2005,156843); 9"Bae et al. (2004b); "Chow et al. (2006a); "Arnott et al. (2005); "Bond et al. (1999); '""Virkkula et al. (2005,157097); '"'Petzold et
al. (2002,156863); ,02Park et al. (2006); "3Arnott et al. (1999, 020650); '"Peters et al. (2001); '"Pitchford et al. (1997,156872); '"Rees et al. (2004, 097164); '"'Watson et al. (2000); '""Lee et
al. (2005,156680); '"Hering et al. (2004,155837); ""Watson et al. (1998); "'Chakrabarti et al. (2004); "2Mathai et al. (1990,156741); '"Kidwell and Ondov (2001, 017092); '"Stanier et al.
(2004); "sKhlystov et al. (2005,156635); ""Takahama et al. (2004,157038); "'Chow et al. (2005,156348); ""Zhang et al. (2002); '"Subramanian et al. (2004, 081203); ,2"Chow et al. (2006b);
"'Birch and Cary (1996); ,22Birch (1998, 024953); ,23Birch and Cary (1996); ""NIOSH (1996,156810); "sNI0SH (1999,156811); ""Chow et al. (1993); "'Chow et al. (2007); ""Ellis and Novakov
(1982,156416); ""Peterson and Richards (2002,156861); ""Schauer et al. (2003); "'Middlebrook et al. (2003, 042932); ,32Wenzel et al. (2003,157139); "3Jimenez et al. (2003); ,34Phares et al.
(2003,156866); "s0in and Prather (2006,156895); ""Zhang et al. (2005); "'Bein et al. (2005,156265); ""Drewnick et al. (2004a); ""Drewnick et al. (2004b); ""Lake et al. (2003,156669);
"'Lake et al. (2004,088411)
July 2009
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table A-9. Measurement and analytical specifications for ions other than NO3 and SO42-.
Instrument & Measurement Principle
Averaging Analytical
Minimum
Data
Time
, Precision Detectable Interferences Comparability „
AcCUraCV Limit (Mdl) Completeness
SAMPLE DISSOLUTION FOLLOWED BY IC ANAL YSIS INSTRUMENTS
N02'by Particle into Liquid Sampler-Ion
Chromatography (PILS-IC)
Ambient particles are mixed with saturated
water vapor to produce droplets collected by
impaction. The resulting liquid stream is analyzed
with an IC to quantify aerosol ionic components.
1-h
n/a
10%b
0.14/yg/m3
Consistent water
quality is essential
for good precision
n/a
n/a
NH4+ by Particle into Liquid Sampler-Ion
Chromatography (PILS-IC)
Ambient particles are mixed with saturated
water vapor to produce droplets collected by
impaction. The resulting liquid stream is analyzed
with an IC to quantify aerosol ionic components.
1-h
n/a
10%b
0.05 /yg/m3
Consistent water
quality is essential
for good precision
— 5% lower than
all-sampler avgc at
Atlanta 7
n/a
CI", Na+, K+, Ca++ by Particle into Liquid
Sampler-Ion Chromatography (PILS-IC)
Ambient particles are mixed with saturated
water vapor to produce droplets collected by
impaction. The resulting liquid stream is analyzed
with an IC to quantify aerosol ionic components.
1-h
n/a
10%b
0.1 /yg/m3
Consistent water
quality is essential
for good precision
n/a
n/a
CI , NO?", NOs-, PO43, SO42 , NH4+, Na+, Mg++,
K+, Ca++ by Ambient Ion Monitor (AIM; Model
9000)
Air is drawn through a size-selective inlet into a
liquid diffusion denuder where interfering gases
are removed. The stream enters a super
saturation chamber where the resulting droplets
are collected through impaction. The collected
particles and a fraction of the condensed water
are accumulated until the particles can be
injected into IC for hourly analysis.
1-h
n/a
n/a
0.1 /yg/m3 for
1-h avgd
n/a
n/a
n/a
July 2009
A-18
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Avera in Anal tical Minimum
Instrument & Measurement Principle „ Precision Detectable Interferences Comparability „
Time Accuracy Completeness
8 Accuracy is the ability of analytical methods to quantify the observable of a standard reference material correctly; does not refer to measurement accuracy, since no standards are available.
b Uncertainty estimated from uncertainties in flow rates and calibrations; does not refer to co-located precision.
c All-sampler avg appears to include a combination of 10 integrated and 3 continuous samplers, although specific details are missing 7. Performance evaluations at sites dominated by semi-volatile
ammonium nitrate are needed.
d Manufacturer specified measurement parameter
Source: 'Chow (1995,077012); 2Watson and Chow (2001,157123);3 Watson et al. (1983, 045084); "Fehsenfeld et al. (2004,156432); 'Solomon et al. (2001,156993); sMikel (2001,156762);
'Mikel (2001,156762); "Watson et al. (1999,020949); 'Solomon and Sioutas (2006,156995); '"Graney et al. (2004, 053756); "Tanaka et al. (1998,157041); "Pancras et al. (2005,098120);
"John et al. (1988,045903); "Hering and Cass (1999, 084958); "Fritz et al. (1989, 077387); '"Hering et al. (1988, 036012); "Solomon et al. (2003,156994); "Cabada et al. (2004,148859);
"Fine et al. (2003,155775); 2°Hogrefe et al. (2004, 099003); ''Drewnick et al. (2003, 099160); 22Watson et al. (2005,157125); 23Ho et al. (2006,156552); 24Decesari et al. (2005,144536);2S
Mayol-Bracero et al. (2002, 045010); 2sYang et al. 2003;21 Tursic et al. (2006,157063); 2"Mader et al.(2004,156724); 29Xiao and Liu (2004, 056801); 3°Kiss et al. (2002,156646); ''Cornell and
Jickells (1999,156367);32 Zheng et al. (2002, 026100); 33Fraser et al. (2002,140741);34 Fraser et al. (2003, 042231) 3sSchauer er al. (1996, 051162); 3sFine et al. (2004); 3,Yue et al. (2004);
3BRinehart et al. (2006,115184); 39Wan and Yu (2006,157104); 40Poore (2000, 012839); "Fraser et al. (2003a); 42Engling et al. (2006,156422); 43Yu et al. (2005); 44Tran et al. (2000); 4sYao et al.
(2004,102213); 4sLi and Yu (2005,156692); "Henning et al. (2003,156539); 4"Zhang and Anastasio (2003,157182); "Enmenegger et al. (2007,156418); s0(Watson et al., 1989,157119);
"Greaves et al. (1985,156494); "Waterman et al. (2000,157116); s3Waterman et al. (2001,157117); s4Falkovich and Rudich (2001,156427); ssChow et al. (2007,156354); "Miguel et al.
(2004,123260); "Crinmins and Baker (2006, 097008); s"Ho and Yu (2004,156551); s9Jeon et al. (2001,016636); ""Mazzoleni et al. (2007, 098038); s,Poore (2000, 012839); ^Butler et al.
(2003); s3Chow et al. (2006c); "Russell et al. (2004, 082453); ssGrover et al. (2006); ssGrover et al. (2005, 090044); "Schwab et al. (2006b); ""Hauck et al. (2004); s9Jaques et al. (2004,
155878); '"Rupprecht and Patashrick (2003,157207); "Pang et al (2002, 030353); "Eatough et al. (2001,010303); ,3Lee et al. (2005,128139); ,4Lee et al. (2005,156680); ,sBabich et al.
(2000,156239); ,sLee et al. (2005c); "Lee et al. (2005,128139); '"Anderson and Ogren (1998,156213); ,9Chung et al. (2001,156357); ""Kidwell and Ondov (2004,155898); "'Lithgow et al.
(2004,126616); ""Weber et al. (2003,157129); "'Harrison et al. (2004); "Rattigan et al. (2006,115897); "sWittig et al. (2004,103413); ""Vaughn et al. (2005,157089); "'Chow et al. (2005,
099030); ""Weber et al (2001,024640); ""Schwab et al. (2006a); "°Lim et al. (2003,156697); "'Watson and Chow (2002,037873); ""Venkatachari et al. (2006,105918); "3Bae et al. (2004a);
"Arhami et al. (2006,156224); "'Park et al. (2005,156843); ""Bae et al. (2004b); "Chow et al. (2006a); ""Arnott et al. (2005); ""Bond et al. (1999); '""Virkkula et al. (2005,157097); '"'Petzold et
al. (2002,156863); ™Park et al. (2006); "3Arnott et al. (1999, 020650); '"Peters et al. (2001); '"'Pitchford et al. (1997,156872); '""Rees et al. (2004, 097164); '"'Watson et al. (2000); '""Lee et
al. (2005,156680); '""Hering et al. (2004,155837); ""Watson et al. (1998); "'Chakrabarti et al. (2004); "2Mathai et al. (1990,156741); '"Kidwell and Ondov (2001, 017092); '"Stanier et al.
(2004); "sKhlystov et al. (2005,156635); ""Takahama et al. (2004,157038); "'Chow et al. (2005,156348); ""Zhang et al. (2002); ""Subramanian et al. (2004, 081203); ,2°Chow et al. (2006b);
"'Birch and Cary (1996); ,22Birch (1998, 024953); ,23Birch and Cary (1996); ""NIOSH (1996,156810); "sNI0SH (1999,156811); ""Chow et al. (1993); "'Chow et al. (2007); ""Ellis and Novakov
(1982,156416); ""Peterson and Richards (2002,156861); ""Schauer et al. (2003); "'Middlebrook et al. (2003, 042932); ,32Wenzel et al. (2003,157139); "3Jimenez et al. (2003); ,34Phares et al.
(2003,156866); "sQin and Prather (2006,156895); ""Zhang et al. (2005); "'Bein et al. (2005,156265); ""Drewnick et al. (2004a); ""Drewnick et al. (2004b); ""Lake et al. (2003,156669);
"'Lake et al. (2004,088411)
Table A-10. Measurement and analytical specifications for continuous carbon.
Instrument and Measurement Principle
Averaging Analytical
Time Accuracy3
Minimum
Precision Detectable Interferences Comparability
Limit
Data
Completeness
PARTICLE COLLECTION ONIMPACTOR FOLLOWED BY FLASH VOLATILIZA TION INSTRUMENT
Aerosol Dynamic Inc. continuous carbon analyzer
(ADI-C)
Particle collection by impaction followed by flash
oxidation and detection of the evolved gases by a
non-dispersive infrared CO2 analyzer. OC is
estimated as twice the oxidizable carbon. EC is not
quantified.
10 min
n/a
n; a
0C:2//g/m3 n/a
EC, TC: not
applicable,
since it
measures only
OC 90
15 to 22% lower
OC than that by
R&P-5400 and Rll-
OGI
83%7
PARTICLE COLLECTION ONFIL TER/IMPACTOR FOLLOWED BYHEA TING/ANAL YSIS INSTRUMENTS
Rupprecht and Patashnick 5400 continuous ambient
carbon analyzer (R&P-5400)
Particles collected on an impactor, which is heated
to 275 °C to 350 °C, then to 700 °C after sample
collection is complete. Evolved C02 is measured by
an infrared detector. OC is defined as the carbon
measured at the lower temperature, and EC is the
remaining carbon measured at the higher
temperature.
1-h
n/a
n/a
OC: 0.5/yg/m3
EC: 0.5/yg/m3
TC: 0.5/yg/m3
n/a
20 to 60% lower
TC than filter TC
by TOR or
TOT.9',92
56 to 6O%0'01
July 2009
A-19
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Instrument and Measurement Principle
Averaging Analytical
Time Accuracy3
Precision
Minimum
Detectable
Limit
Interferences Comparability
Data
Completeness
Rutgers University-Oregon Graduate Institute (RU-
OGI) in-situ thermal/optical transmittance carbon
analyzer.
Air is sampled through a quartz-fiber filter for 1 -h
and then analyzed by heating through different
temperature steps to determine OC and EC. Sample
flow is pre-split into two identical systems that
alternate every hour between sampling and analysis
mode to achieve continuous measurements.
30 min
n/a
3%b'
0.3/yg/m3 n/a
0.5/yg/m3
0.4/yg/m3
8% higher 00 and
20% lower EC than
R&P5400 00
86%7
Sunset semi-continuous realtime carbon aerosol
analysis instrument (Sunset OCEC)
Particles collected on a quartz-fiber filter are subject
to heating temperature ramps following the NIOSH
5040 TOT protocol and the resulting CO2 is analyzed
by nondispersive infrared (NDIR) detector to quantify
OC and EC. Instrument is alternated between
sampling and analytical mode.
1-h
n/a
OC: 10%c
EC: 20%c
TC: 10%c
OC: n/a
EC: n/a
TC: 0.4/yg/m3
(1-havg)96
n/a
Within 7 to 25% of
filter OC and EC
and within 15% for
TC. Wide variation
due to differentces
in temperature and
analysis protocols.
80 to 89%6,95
LIGHT ABSORPTION INSTRUMENTS
Aethalometer (AE-16, AE-21, AE-31) 5 min
n/a
5 to
BC e:
Subject to multiple
Within ± 25% of 75 to 90%6
Attenuation of light transmitted through a quartz-
10%d'7'97
0.1 /yg/m300
scattering effects
RU-OGI, Sunset
fiber filter tape that continuously samples aerosol is
by particle and
and filter EC by
TOR/TOT.00"02
measured and converted to a BC mass concentration
filter matrix
using cjabs of 14625/A (m2/g).
resulting in
absorption en-
hancement. Em-
pirical corrections
have been proposed
98 that can correct
for such effects.
Particle Soot Absorption Photometer (PSAP)
Attenuation of light transmitted through a glass-
fiber filter that continuously samples aerosol is
measured to quantify light absorption (bate).
1 min
n/a
6 to
BC f:
0.1 /yg/m300
Instrument includes
an empirical
correction for
scattering and
loading effects 99
and adjustments
have been proposed
for the three wave-
length model100
— 50% lower than
AE-16, RU-OGI and
R&P-5400 EC.00
n/a
Multi-Angle Absorption Photometer (MAAP) Light
transmittance at 0° and reflectance from a glass-
fiber filter at 130° and 165° from the illumination
direction are used in a radiative transfer model to
estimate bate and is converted to BC using crate of
6.6 m2/g.
1 min
n/a
12%°'101
BC h:
0.05 /yg/m3
(or bate - 0.33
Mm-1 for 10-
min avg)
0.02 /yg/m3
(or bate - 0.13
Mm-1 for 30-
min avg)101
The instrument is
designed to mini-
mize multiple scat-
tering and loading
effects by mea-
suring both trans-
mittance and
reflectance and
using a two-stream
approximation
radiative transfer
model to calculate
Within 18% of
filter EC by
IMPROVETOR
(R2 - 0.96) and up
to 40% higher than
Sunset EC. 102
n/a
July 2009 A-20 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Instrument and Measurement Principle
Averaging Analytical
Time Accuracy3
Precision
Minimum
Detectable
Limit
Interferences Comparability
Data
Completeness
DRI Photoacoustic Analyzer (DRI-PA)
Light absorption by particles in air results in a
heating of the surrounding air. The expansion of the
heated air produces an acoustic (sound wave) signal
which is detected by a microphone to determine bate,
which is converted to BC using (Tabs - 5 m2/g for
the 1047 nm instrument and (Tabs - 10 m2/g for the
532 nm instrument.
5 sec
n/a
n/a
BC i:
At 532 nm, absor-
Good correlation
0.04 /yg/m3(or
bance by NO2
(R2 >0.80), but
babs = 0.4
interferes with that
more than 40%
Mm-1 for 10-
by particles. Ac-
lower than
min avg) at
counted by either
aethalometer,
532 nm103
removing NO2 from
MAAP and filter
sample line using
IMPROVE TOR
denuders or by
EC. Suggests need
doing a periodic
for a different (Tabs.
background
102
(particle-free air)
subtraction.
n/a
PHOTOIONIZA TION INSTRUMENTS
Photoionization monitor for 91 %6T polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAS PAH) The air stream is
exposed to UV radiation, which ionizes the particle-
bound PAH molecules. The charged particles are
collected on a filter element and the piezoelectric
current is proportional to the particle-bound PAH.
5 min
n/a
n/a
-3ng/m3i,k n/a
n/a
> 91 %6t
8 Accuracy is the ability of analytical methods to quantify the observable of a standairi reference material correctly; does not refer to measurement accuracy, since no standards are available.
b No specific details on how the precision was estimated; appears to be based on replicate analysis, may not represent overall co-located measurement precision
c Co-located precision estimates based on variation in avg ratios of replicate analysis using laboratory instrument and regression slopes (Slopes for OC = 1.01, EC = 0.82, TC = 0.94; R2 = 0.97 -
0.99) of co-located field measurements.
d Estimated using co-located AE-21 and AE-31 BC measurements at Fresno, CA.97
e While the default manufacturer recommended conversion factor (or mass absorption efficiency, aabs) is 16.6 m2/g at 880 nm, Lim et al. (2003) assumed a value of 12.6 m2/g.
f Assuming a aabs of 10 m2/g.
B Co-located precision estimate based on the variability of the avg ratio (0.99 ± 0.12).
h Assuming a aabs of 6.5 rrv7g.
'Assuming a aabs of 10 m2/g at 532 nm and 5 m2/g at 1047 nm.
1 Specified by manufacturer as "lower threshold"; needs to be calibrated with site-specific PAH. Typically used as a relative measure in terms of electrical output in femtoamps.
k Manufacturer specified measurement parameter
n/a: Not available.
Source: 'Chow (1995,077012); 2Watson and Chow (2001,157123);3 Watson et al. (1983, 045084); "Fehsenfeld et al. (2004,156432); 'Solomon et al. (2001,156993); sMikel (2001,156762);
'Mikel (2001,156762); "Watson et al. (1999,020949); 'Solomon and Sioutas (2006,156995); ,0Graney et al. (2004, 053756); "Tanaka et al. (1998,157041); "Pancras et al. (2005,098120);
"John et al. (1988,045903); "Hering and Cass (1999, 084958); "Fritz et al. (1989, 077387); '"Hering et al. (1988, 036012); "Solomon et al. (2003,156994); '"Cabada et al. (2004,148859);
"Fine et al. (2003,155775); 20Hogrefe et al. (2004, 099003); 2,Drewnick et al. (2003, 099160); 22Watson et al. (2005,157125); 23Ho et al. (2006,156552); 24Decesari et al. (2005,144536);2S
Mayol-Bracero et al. (2002, 045010); 2sYang et al. 2003;21 Tursic et al. (2006,157063); 2"Mader et al.(2004,156724); 29Xiao and Liu (2004, 056801); "Kiss et al. (2002,156646); ''Cornell and
Jickells (1999,156367);32 Zheng et al. (2002, 026100); 33Fraser et al. (2002,140741);34 Fraser et al. (2003, 042231) 3sSchauer er al. (1996, 051162); 3sFine et al. (2004); 3,Yue et al. (2004);
3BRinehart et al. (2006,115184); 39Wan and Yu (2006,157104); 40Poore (2000, 012839); "Fraser et al. (2003a); 42Engling et al. (2006,156422); 43Yu et al. (2005); 44Tran et al. (2000); 4sYao et al.
(2004,102213); 4sLi and Yu (2005,156692); "Henning et al. (2003,156539); 4"Zhang and Anastasio (2003,157182); "Enmenegger et al. (2007,156418); s0(Watson et al., 1989,157119);
"Greaves et al. (1985,156494); "Waterman et al. (2000,157116); s3Waterman et al. (2001,157117); s4Falkovich and Rudich (2001,156427); ssChow et al. (2007,156354); "Miguel et al.
(2004,123260); "Crinmins and Baker (2006, 097008); s"Ho and Yu (2004,156551); s9Jeon et al. (2001,016636); "Mazzoleni et al. (2007, 098038); s,Poore (2000, 012839); ^Butler et al.
(2003); G3Chow et al. (2006c); "Russell et al. (2004, 082453); ssGrover et al. (2006); "Graver et al. (2005, 090044); "Schwab et al. (2006b); "Hauck et al. (2004); s9Jaques et al. (2004,
155878); '"Rupprecht and Patashrick (2003,157207); "Pang et al (2002, 030353); ,2Eatough et al. (2001,010303); ,3Lee et al. (2005,128139); ,4Lee et al. (2005,156680); ,sBabich et al.
(2000,156239); ,sLee et al. (2005c); "Lee et al. (2005,128139); '"Anderson and Ogren (1998,156213); ,9Chung et al. (2001,156357); "Kidwell and Ondov (2004,155898); "'Lithgow et al.
(2004,126616); ""Weber et al. (2003,157129); "'Harrison et al. (2004); "Rattigan et al. (2006,115897); "sWittig et al. (2004,103413); ""Vaughn et al. (2005,157089); "'Chow et al. (2005,
099030); ""Weber et al (2001,024640); ""Schwab et al. (2006a); "Lim et al. (2003,156697); "'Watson and Chow (2002,037873); ""Venkatachari et al. (2006,105918); "3Bae et al. (2004a);
"Arhami et al. (2006,156224); "'Park et al. (2005,156843); "Bae et al. (2004b); "Chow et al. (2006a); "Arnott et al. (2005); ""Bond et al. (1999); '"Virkkula et al. (2005,157097); '"'Petzold et
al. (2002,156863); ,02Park et al. (2006); "3Arnott et al. (1999, 020650); '"Peters et al. (2001); '"'Pitchford et al. (1997,156872); '"Rees et al. (2004, 097164); '"'Watson et al. (2000); '""Lee et
al.(2005,156680); '""Hering et al. (2004,155837); ""Watson et al. (1998); "'Chakrabarti et al. (2004); "2Mathai et al. (1990,156741); '"Kidwell and Ondov (2001, 017092); '"Stanier et al.
(2004); "sKhlystov et al. (2005,156635); ""Takahama et al. (2004,157038); "'Chow et al. (2005,156348); ""Zhang et al. (2002); ""Subramanian et al. (2004, 081203); ,2°Chow et al. (2006b);
"'Birch and Cary (1996); ,22Birch (1998, 024953); ,23Birch and Cary (1996); ""NIOSH (1996,156810); ,2sNI0SH (1999,156811); ""Chow et al. (1993); "'Chow et al. (2007); ""Ellis and Novakov
(1982,156416); ""Peterson and Richards (2002,156861); ""Schauer et al. (2003); "'Middlebrook et al. (2003, 042932); ,32Wenzel et al. (2003,157139); "'Jimenez et al. (2003); ,34Phares et al.
(2003,156866); "sQin and Prather (2006,156895); ""Zhang et al. (2005); "'Bein et al. (2005,156265); ""Drewnick et al. (2004a); ""Drewnick et al. (2004b); ""Lake et al. (2003,156669);
"'Lake et al. (2004,088411)
July 2009
A-21
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table A-11. Summary of mass measurement comparisons.
Site I Period I Sampler I Configuration
Summary of Findings
1. Birmingham, AL (11/04/96 To 11/23/96)
2. Denver-Adams City, CO (12/11/96 To 1/7/97)
3. Bakersfield, CA (1/21/97 To 3/19/97)
4. Denver-Welby, Co (12/12/96 To 12/21/96)
5. Phoenix, AZ (12/06/96 To 12/21/96)
6. Azusa, CA (3/25/97 To 5/19/97)
7. Research Triangle Park (RTP), NC (1/17/97 To 8/14/97)
8. Rubidoux, CA (1/6/99 To 2/26/99)
9. Atlanta, GA (8/3/99 To 8/31/99)
SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
FILTER TYPE'
DENUDER"
RAAS2.5-100 PM2.6
FRM
16.7
Teflon (n/a)
None
RAAS2.5-300 PM2.1,
FRM
16.7
Teflon (n/a)
None
RAAS2.5-200 PM2.1,
FRM
16.7
Teflon (n/a)
None
R&P Partisol 2000
PM2.6 FRM
16.7
Teflon (n/a)
None
R&P Partisol-plus
2025 PM2.6 FRM
16.7
Teflon (n/a)
None
BGI PQ200 PM2.6
FRM
16.7
Teflon (n/a)
None
Sierra Instruments
SA-244 Dichot
16.7
Teflon (n/a)
None
IMPROVE PM2.6
22.8
Teflon (n/a)
None
Harvard PM2.6
Impactor
10
Teflon (n/a)
None
Airmetrics battery
powered PM2.6
MiniVol
5
Teflon (n/a)
None
ATLANTA SUPERSITE, GA: 8/3/99 TO 9/1/99
4 km NW of downtown, within 200 m of a bus maintenance yard and several warehouse
facilities, representative of a mixed commercial-residential neighborhood.
Sampler
Flow
Rate
(L/Min)
Filter Type"
Denuder1
R&P-2000 FRM
16.7
Teflon (P)
None
RAAS-100 FRM
16.7
Teflon (P)
None
RAAS-400
24
Teflon (P)
None
SASS
6.7
Teflon (P)
None
MASS-400
16.7
Teflon (P)
Na2C03
R&P-2300
10
Teflon (P)
None
R&P-2025 Dichot:
PM2.6
15
Teflon (P)
None
PM 10-2.6
1.67
Polycarbonate
None Na2C03/Citric
Peters et al., (2001,017108)'": Pitchford et al., (1997,156872)1"5
dataset
Co-located precision (CV) for the RAAS2.5-100 samplers ranged from 1.5%
at Bakersfield to 6.2% at Birmingham.
In Birmingham, CV for two co-located Harvard Impactor was 1% and for
three Dichots was 6.2%. The IMPROVE samplers had greater variability, with
a CV of 11.3% (Denver-Adam City) and 10.8% (Bakersfield).
Partisol and RAAS showed the strongest pairwise comparison
' (slope — 1.0 ± 0.06, intercept — 0.26 ± 1.81, and correlation - 1.0),
within the EPA equivalency criteria. Strong relationships (correlation > 0.96;
slope - 0.9 - 1.12, intercept < 3ct) were observed for other samplers in
reference to the RAAS.
" At Denver-Welby, 6 RAAS samplers were deployed (3 with and 3 without
temperature compensation for flow control). The units with temperature
compensation had a positive bias relative to the non-temperature
compensated units.
Non-FRM samplers did not meet the EPA equivalency criteria, despite strong
- linear relationships with the FRM sampler.
Peters et al.10*: RTP 97 dataset
¦ CV was 1.7%, 2.3%, 3.4%, 6.4% for the PQ200, Partisol 2000, RAAS2.5-
100, and Dichot, respectively. Dichot flows were valve controlled and set
visually by the operator using rotameters.
Good one-to-one correspondence was observed for FRM comparisons. The
FRM averages were within -1.2% to 3.2%, within the acceptable ± 10%
- range
Peters et al. 104: Rubidoux 99 and Atlanta 99 dataset
¦ In Rubidoux, the precision for PQ200 was 6.1 %, higher than at RTP 97. In
Atlanta, the grouped data from PQ200, RAAS2.5-300, and Partisol yielded a
' precision of 1.7%.
Linear regression results met the EPA equivalency criteria for all FRMs.
Solomon et al.17
PM2.5 mass from individual samplers was compared to all-sampler avgs,
called the filter relative reference (filter RR) value. Overall agreements were
within ± 20% of filter RR.
FRM samplers were within 3.5% of filter RR.
Avg mass measured by RAAS-400, SASS and URG-PCM were within ± 10%
of filter RR. Avg mass measured by MASS-400, R&P-2300 and R&P-2025
dichot were greater than filter RR but within ± 20%. Avg mass measured by
PC-BOSS (BYU) and ARA-PCM were lower than filter RR within ±10%.
All samplers except PC-BOSS (TVA) had R2 > 0.80, relative to filter RR.
While avg mass for each sampler was within 20%, daily variability was
>50% of filter RR.
Glycerol in the Na2C03 denuder may have contaminated the filter in the
MASS-400 sampler resulting in higher PM2.6 values.
PC-BOSS samplers removed particles < 0.1 pm aerodynamic diameter from
PM2.6 measurements. Corrections were made using sulfate (SO42 )
concentrations in the major flow or immediately after the PM2.6 inlet, but
before the flow split-up. This was insufficient to bring PC-BOSS mass close
to filter RR. PC-BOSS was also equipped with upstream denuders ahead of
July 2009
A-22
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Site I Period I Sampler I Configuration
URG-PCM
16.7
Teflon (P)
Acid
ARA-PCM
16.7
Teflon (n/a)
Na2C03/Citric acid
PC-BOSS (operated
by TVA)
105
Teflon (W)
CIF
PC-BOSS (operated
by BYU)
150
Teflon (W)
CIF
PM2.5 CONTINUOUS
SAMPLER
FLOW
BATE
(L/MIN)
INLET TEMPEBATUBE DBYEB
OTHEB
TEOM
16.7
30 °C
Nafion
PM2.6
ATLANTA SUPEBSITE, GA: 11/21/01 TO 12/23/01
PM2.5 SAMPLEB
FLOW
BATE
(L/MIN)
FILTEB TYPE1
DENUDES1
R&P-2025 FRM
16.7
Teflon (n/a)
None
PM2.5 CONTINUOUS
SAMPLEB
FLOW
BATE
(L/MIN)
INLET
TEMPEBATUBE
DBYEB
OTHEB
TEOM
16.7
30 °C
Nafion
PM2.6
SESTEOM
16.7
30 °C
Nafion
PM2.6
CAMM
0.3
n/a
Nafion
PM2.6
RAMS
16.7
30 °C
Nafion
PM2.6
TEA & CIF
denuders With
particle
concentrator
Summary of Findings
the filters, which may have enhanced loss of semi-volatile components,
resulting in a lower mass on the filter.
Butler et al.62
The sum of individual species accounted for —78% of the RAAS-100 FRM
PM2.6 mass concentration.
TEOM explained ~ 82 to 92% of the species sum of RAAS with R2 - 0.86.
Lee et al.73
RAMS PM2.E adjusted using particle concentrator efficiency of 0.5.
Good correlation between SESTEOM and Radiance Research M903s
(R2 - 0.80), while medium correlation was found between CAMM and
Radiance Research M903 (R2 - 0.64) or RAMS and Radiance Research
M903 (R2 - 0.63).
CAMM - (0.75 ± 0.03) SESTEOM + (2.51 ± 0.51); R2 - 0.78; N - 196
RAMS - (0.85 ± 0.06) SESTEOM + (5.34 ± 1.04); R2 - 0.52; N - 96
RAMS - (0.91 ± 0.07) CAMM + (5.71 ± 1.20); R2 - 0.43; N - 196
Semi-volatile material explains the difference between RAMS and SES
TEOM.
CAMM - (0.75 ± 0.08) R&P-2025 FRM + (2.47 ± 1.02); R2 - 0.76;
N - 31
RAMS - (0.97 ± 0.22) R&P-2025 FRM + (2.39 ± 3.42); R2 - 0.64;
N - 13
SES TEOM - (1.07 ± 0.05) R&P-2025 FRM + (-1.34 ± 0.71); R2 - 0.95;
N - 26
CAMM vs. FRM yielded lower slopes (0.75) with high intercepts.
Radiance Research
M903
n/a
n/a
Nafion
bscat
Radiance Research
M903
n/a
n/a
None
bscat
PITTSBURGH SUPEBSITE, PA: 7/1/01 to 6/1/02 6 km east of downtown in a park on the Cabada et al;1S: Bees et al.1
top of a \
SAMPLEB
FLOW
BATE
(L/MIN)
FILTEB TYPEa
DENUDEB
MOUDI-110
30
Teflon (P,d)
None
And-241 Dichot
16.7
Teflon (P
None
R&P-2000 PM2.6
FRM
16.7
Teflon (W)
None
PM2.5 CONTINUOUS
SAMPLEB
FLOW
BATE
(L/MIN)
INLET TEMPEBATUBE
DBYEB OTHEB
SESTEOM
16.7
30 °C
Nafion PM2.6
DAASS
n/a
30 °C
Nafion or PM2.6
None
M0UDI PM10 - 0.80 Dichot PM10, R2 - 0.85
M0UDI PM2.6 - 1.03 Dichot PM2.6, R2 - 0.78
M0UDI PM2.6 - 1.01 FRM PM2.6, R2 - 0.78
Dichot PM2.6 - 0.97 FRM PM2.1, + 0.02; R2 - 0.94
Good agreement for PM2.6 FRM, Dichot, and M0UDI. Lower slope for PM10
suggests loss of coarse particles in the MOUDI sampler.
Ultrafine (< 100 nm) mass (PM0.10) measurements had high uncertainties
(-30%)
Ultrafine mass by MOUDI showed no correlation with ultrafine volume
(V0.10) by DAASS. Ratio of PM0.10/PM2.6 mass ratio showed reasonable
agreement with volume ratio (V0.10/V2.5, R2 - 0.55, slope - 0.76). Bounce
of large particles to smaller stages in MOUDI was small, since mass ratio
(PM0.10/PM2.6) did not exceed volume ratio (V0.10/V2.5). Low correlation
between ultrafine mass and volume could be due to the ultrafine mass
measurement uncertainty or due to fundamental differences in the
measurement methods employed by MOUDI and DAASS. Ambient conditions
and characteristics of the aerosols (such as non-spherical shapes of fresh
particles) could also influence these estimates.
July 2009
A-23
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Site I Period / Sampler / Configuration Summary of Findings
Rees etal.106
SES-TEOM PM2.6 - 1.02 FRM PM2.6 + 0.65; R2 - 0.95
Volatilization did not affect SES-TEOM performance when PM2.6 mass >20-
30/yglm3. When ambient temperature was < -6 °C, and when mass was
low, SES-TEOM was lower (up to 50%) than FRM or Dichot.
FRESNO SUPERSITE, CA and other CRPAQS sites; 12/2/99 to 2/3/01. Some
comparisons included data till 12/29/03 . Fresno Supersite was located 5.5 km northeast of
downtown in a mixed residential-commercial neighborhood. 107
SAMPLER
FLOW
RATE
(L/MIN)
FILTER TYPEa
DENUDER
RAAS-100 PM2.6
FRM
16.7
Teflon (P)
None
RAAS-300 PM2.6
FRM
16.7
Teflon (P)
None
R&P-2000 PM2.6
FRM
16.7
Teflon (P)
None
R&P-2025 PM2.6
FRM
16.7
Teflon (P)
None
RAAS-400 PM2.6
24
Teflon (P)
None
SASS PM2.6
6.7
Teflon (P)
None
And-246 Dichot
PM2.6
15
Teflon (P)
None
PM 10-2.6
1.67
Teflon (P)
None
DRI-SFS PM2.1,
113
Teflon (P)
None
MiniVol PM2.6
5
Teflon (P)
None
MOUDI-100
30
FEPb Teflon (P)
None
And-hlVOL PM10 FRM
1130
Teflon (P)
None
Chow etal.63
PM2.6 measurements from the 11 filter samplers were within ~ 20% of each
other, except for MiniVols, which were 20 to 30% lower than RAAS-300
FRM.
All the FRM samplers were within ± 10% of each other.
All the filter samplers were well correlated with each other (R2 > 0.901.e
DRI-SFS (with HNO3 denuder) and And-246 Dichot PM2.6 were lower (~ 5%
and 7%, respectively, on avg) than FRM, possibly due to nitrate (NO3-)
volatilization.
Poor correlation (R2) found between TE0M PM2.6 concentrations and RAAS-
100 FRM. TE0M PM2.6 was lower than RAAS-100 FRM by 22%. Heating of
TE0M inlet to 50 °C resulted in loss of semi-volatile components such as
ammonium nitrate (NH4N03) and possibly some semi-volatile organic
compounds.
TE0M PM10 concentrations were 28% lower than the And-hlV0L10 FRM on
avg, ranging from 13% in summer to 43% in winter.
TE0M was neither equivalente nor comparablee to the FRM sampler for
PM2.6 or PM10.
BAM PM2.6 concentrations showed high correlation (R2 > 0.90) with the
RAAS-100 and RAAS-300 FRM samplers, with slopes ranging from 0.92 to
0.97. BAM PM2.6 was typically higher than FRM (17 to 30%) except at
Bakersfield, CA, where it was 21 % lower, suggesting a BAM calibration
difference between Bakersfield and other sites.
BAM PM10 concentrations were 26% higher than And-hlVOL PM10 FRM
concentration on avg (R2 >0.92).
Higher BAM measurements were attributed to water absorption by
hygroscopic particles. BAM PM2.6 and PM10 deviations were larger for
concentrations < 25/yg/m3.
Grover et al.65
(0.88 ± 0.04) FDMS-TE0M + (6.7 ± 4.3); R2 - 95;
(1.11 ± 0.07) D-TE0M + (7.5 ± 6.1); R2 - 0.90; n - 29
¦ (0.80 ± 0.01) TE0m30C + (1.1 ± 3.1); R2 - 0.91;
¦ (0.50 ± 0.01) FDMS-TE0M -(1.7 ± 6.9); R2 - 0.68;
PC-BOSS PM2.6 ¦
n - 29
PC-BOSS PM2.6 ¦
TE0M50C PM2.6 ¦
n - 507
TE0m30C PM2.1, ¦
n - 516
Heated GRIMM PM concentrations were lower than FDMS-TEOM and
ambient temperature GRIMM, suggesting loss of semi-volatile matter.
Data recovery was greater than 95% for all continuous instruments, except
for D-TEOM, which had 86% recovery.
Reasonable agreement was seen between FDMS-TEOM, D-TEOM, BAM, and
GRIMM PM2.E when semi-volatile matter was dominated by NH4NO3.
However, the FDMS-TEOM was higher than the other instruments during
high concentration periods, associated with days with a high fraction of
semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs). Possible differences in SVOCs may
have contributed to the differences between FDMS and other instruments.
CONTINUOUS SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
INLET
TEMPERATURE
DRYER
OTHER
TEOM
16.7
50 °C
None
PM2.6 and PM10
BAM
16.7
Ambient
None
PM2.6 and PM10
July 2009
A-24
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Site I Period I Sampler I Configuration
Summary of Findings
SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (LfMIN) FILTER TYPEa
PC-BOSS PM2.6
150
Teflon (W)
DENUDERb
CIF
CONTINUOUS SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
INLET
TEMPERATURE
DRYER
OTHER
TEOM
16.7
50 °C
None
PM2.6
TEOM
16.7
30 °C
None
PM2.6
FDMSTEOM
16.7
30 °C
Nafion
PM2.6
D-TEOM
16.7
30 °C
Nafion
PM2.6
GRIMM1100
1.2
Ambient
None
bscat
GRIMM1100
1.2
80 °C heater,
resulting in aerosol
temperature
Heater
bscat
BAM
16.7
Ambient
None
PM2.6
HOUSTON SUPERSITE, TX; 1/1/00 to 2/28/02
The Houston Supersite included three sites located in southeast Texas including one on the grounds of a
municipal airport at the edge of a small community, one adjacent to the highly industrial ship channel and one on
the grounds of a middle school in a suburban community.
Russell et al.Lee et al.103
Good correlations between 24-h SES-TEOM PM2.6 and
R&P-2025 FRM mass.
CAMM - (0.93 + 0.03) RAMS + (3.14 + 0.74);
R2 - 0.81
PM2.5 SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
FILTER TYPE1
DENUDER
R&P-2025 FRM
16.7
Teflon (n/a)
None
SES-TEOM - (0.92 ± 0.03) RAMS + (1.52 ± 0.77);
. R2 - 0 80
SES-TEOM - (1.01 ± 0.03) CAMM + (-1.91 ± 0.79);
CONTINUOUS SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
INLET
TEMPERATURE
DRYER
OTHER"
R2 - 0.83
Correlation of Radiance Research M903 and SES-TEOM
- was good (R2 - 0.95), while that of Radiance Research
M903 with CAMM or RAMS was poor (R2 ~ 0.4).
TEOM
16.7
50 °C
None
PM2.6
SES-TEOM
16.7
30 °C
Nafion
PM2.6
Aug-Sep '00
RAMS > SES-TEOM at high temperature and low RH
(< 60%), suggesting loss of water and particulate N03-
-from SES-TEOM.
CAMM - (1.02 ± 0.08) R&P-2025 + (1.62 ± 1.35);
R2 - 0.89
CAMM
0.3
Ambient
Nafion
PM2.6
Aug-Sep '00
RAMS
16.7
30 °C
Nafion
PM2.6
TEA & CIF
denuders; Aug-
Sep '00
RAMS - (1.10 ± 0.08) R&P-2025 + (0.68 ± 1.28);
R2 - 0.89
SES-TEOM - (1.09 ± 0.07) R&P-2025 + (0.21 ± 1.27);
R2 - 0.94
Radiance Research M903
n/a
n/a
Nafion
Bscat Aug-Sep
'00
Integrated mass < Continuous PM2.6 mass. Difference
possibly related to loss of SVOCs and N03- from
integrated sampler
LOS ANGELES SUPERSITE, CA; 9/01 to 8/02
The Los Angeles Supersite consisted of multiple sampling locations in the South Coast Air Basin to provide wide
geographical and seasonal coverage, including urban "source" sites and downwind "receptor" sites.
SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
FILTER TYPE1
DENUDER"
R&P-2025 Dichot
PM2.6
15
Teflon (P)
None
PM 10-2.6
16.7
n/a
None
MOUDI-110
30
Teflon (P
None
HEADS PM2.1,
10
Teflon (n/a)
NaHCOs
Jaques et al.E9; Hering et al.109
Dichot PM2.6 - 0.83 MOUDI + 1.23; R2 - 0.83 (n - 37)
Dichot PM2.E showed higher N03- loss than MOUDI,
consistent with anodized aluminum surfaces serving as
efficient denuders that remove volatilized N03-.2.110.
D-TEOM PM2.6 - 1.18 MOUDI - 1.28; R2 - 0.86
(n - 20)
Over-estimation of D-TEOM may be due to particle losses
in the MOUDI.
PM2.6 by D-TEOM during ESP-off phase (net artifact
effect) tracked well with the N03- concentrations.
NOs- vaporization from the TEOM was caused by the
temperature of the TEOM filter (— 30 - 50 0C) rather
July 2009
A-25
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Site I Period I Sampler I Configuration
Summary of Findings
CONTINUOUS SAMPLER FLOW RATE (L/MIN) INLET DRYER
TEMPERATURE
OTHER
D-TEOM
16.7
30 °C
Nafion
PM2.6
Nano-BAM
16.7
Ambient
None
— 150 nm cut-
(BAM-1020 with d50
point at 16.7
148 ± 10 nm inlet)
L/min
SMPS-3936
0.3
Ambient
None
Number to mass
assuming
spherical
particles of 1.6
g/cc density
than the pressure drop across the filter.
Vaporization from the TEOM had a time constant between
10 to 100 min, depending on ambient and TEOM filter
temperatures; the vapor pressure, and the extent of vapor
saturation upstream and downstream of the TEOM filter.
The mass measured during 5 min periods (ESP-on and off
cycle in D-TEOM) provides an estimate of the dynamic
vaporization losses.
Chakrabarti et al.111
Good agreement between MOUDI PM0.15 and Nano-BAM
PM0.15 (MOUDI PM0.15 - 0.97 Nano-BAM PM0.15 +
0.60; R2 - 0.92; n - 24)
Nano-BAM captured peak PM0.15 concentrations not
quantified by SMPS. Potential particle agglomeration
(with resulting high surface areas) caused SMPS to
include particles in the accumulation- rather than
ultrafine-mode, since mobility diameter is a function of
surface area.
RUBIDOUX, CA; 08/15/01 to 09/07/01, 07/01/03 to 07/31/03. Rubidoux is located in the eastern section of
the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB) in the north-west corner of Riverside County, 78 km downwind of the
central Los Angeles metropolitan area and in the middle of the remaining agricultural production area in SoCAB.
SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
FILTER TYPE1
DENUDER"
PC-BOSS PM2.6
150
Teflon (W)
CIF
R&P-2025 PM2.6 FRM
16.7
Teflon (n/a)
None
CONTINUOUS SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
INLET
TEMPERATURE
DRYER
OTHER
TEOM
16.7
50 °C
None
PM2.6
FDMS-TEOM
16.7
30 °C
Nafion
PM2.6
D-TEOM
16.7
30 °C
Nafion
PM2.6
RAMS
16.7
30 °C
Nafion
PM2.6
Denuders used
CAMM
0.3
n/a
None
PM2.6
Radiance Research M903
n/a
n/a
Nafion
bscat
Radiance Research M903 n/a
n/a
None
bscat
Grover et al.66 (2003 measurements):
D-TEOM - (0.98 ± 0.02) FDMS-TEOM + (-0.6 ± 5.3);
R2-0.85; n - 426; excludes 38 data points when FDMS-
TEOM PM2.6 was higher than DTEOM PM2.6 by
— 21 /yg/m3.
RAMS - (0.93 ± 0.02) FDMS-TEOM + (2.4 ± 8.2);
R2 - 0.81; n - 337
FDMS-TEOM - (0.96 ± 0.06) PC-BOSSconstructed mass
+ (-0.3 ± 3.9); R2 - 0.90; n - 33
R&P-2025 FRM - (0.96 ± 0.06) FDMS-TEOM +
(-9.3 ± 3.9); R2 - 0.90; n - 29
The R&P-2025 FRM PM2.6 was, on avg, ~ 32% lower
than FDMSTEOM. Losses of NH4NO3 and organics can
account for the difference.
TEOM @ 50 °C PM2.6 was consistently lower than FDMS-
TEOM, DTEOM or RAMS and was, on avg, ~ 50% lower
than FDMS TEOM. This difference is due to loss of semi-
volatile NOs- and organics from the heated TEOM.
FDMS-TEOM and D-TEOM needed little attention from
site operators.
Lee et al.76 ( 2 0 01 measurements)
D-TEOM PM2.6 and Radiance Research M903s light
July 2009 A-26 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Site I Period I Sampler I Configuration
Summary of Findings
scattering (with and without dryers) showed good
correlation.
D-TEOM - (3.69 ± 0.09) Radiance Research M903no-
dryer + (2.74 ± 0.89); R2 - 0.84; n - 299
D-TEOM - (3.79 ± 0.10) Radiance Research M903dryed
+ (4.08 ± 0.84); R2 - 0.83; n - 312
Radiance Research M903no-dryer - (1.03 ± 0.01)
Radiance Research M903dryed + (0.34 ± 0.05);
R2 - 0.98; n - 513; absorbed water did not affect
relationship to PM2.6.
CAMM and RAMS compared poorly (R2 - 0 to 0.25) with
D-TEOM, Radiance Research M903s and among
themselves.
RAMS correlated well with D-TEOM for PM2.6
> 30/yglm3 due to RAMS's efficient particle collection of
larger particle sizes (historically associated with high
mass loadings at this site) in the PM2.6 size range.
D-TEOM PM2.6 correlated well with ADI-N sized NO3
(R2 - 0.62) and 0C by Sunset OCEC (R2 - 0.61)
suggesting that D-TEOM measured PM2.6 mass with
minimum loss of SVOCs. RAMS showed R2 of 0.20 (IMO3-)
to 0.30 (OC), while CAMM showed no correlation.
LINDON, UT; 01/29/03 to 02/12/03
Grover etal.66
SAMPLER FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
FILTER TYPE1
DENUDER1
RAMS required regular maintenance.
" RAMS - (0.92 ± 0.03) FDMS-TEOM + (1.3 ± 3.9);
R2 - 0.69; n - 332
PC-BOSS PM2.1, 150
Teflon (W)
CIF
PC-BOSS constructed mass - (0.89 ± 0.21) FDMS-
-TEOM + (1.8 ± 2.8); R2 - 0.66; n - 11
TEOM @ 30 °C PM2.6 was consistently lower than FDMS-
. TEOM and the difference was consistent with
CONTINUOUS SAMPLER FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
INLET
TEMPERATURE
DRYER
OTHER
TEOM 16.7
30 °C
None
PM2.6
concentrations SVOCs and NH4NO3 measured by PC-
- BOSS.
FDMS-TEOM 16.7
30 °C
Nafion
PM2.6
RAMS 16.7
30 °C
Nafion
PM2.6 Denuder
used
PHILADELPHIA, PA; 07/02/01 to 08/01/01 At water treatment center in a grassy field surrounded by mixed
deciduous and pine trees on three sides and a river on the other. Within 0.5 km of Interstate I-95 and within 30
km from downtown Philadelphia.
Lee et al.73
Radiance Research M903dryer - (0.78 ± 0.01) Radiance
Research M903no dryer + (0.30 ± 0.03); R2 - 0.95
SAMPLER FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
FILTER TYPE1
DENUDER"
Radiance Research M903s vs. CAMM, R2 - 0.78
Harvard Impactor PM2.B 10
Teflon (n/a)
n/a
Radiance Research M903s vs. RAMS, R2 - 0.63
Radiance Research M903svs. SES-TEOM, R2 - 0.72
CAMM - (0.60 + 0.03) SES-TEOM + (2.0 + 0.42);
R2 - 0.71; N - 185
RAMS - (0.71 ± 0.04) SES-TEOM + (2.51 ± 0.59);
CONTINUOUS SAMPLER FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
INLET
TEMPERATURE
DRYER
OTHER
SES-TEOM 16.7
35 °C
Nafion
PM2.6
R2 - 0.63; N - 185
- RAMS - (0.93 ± 0.06) CAMM + (2.44 ± 0.68);
R2 - 0.55; N - 185
CAMM 0.3
n/a
Nafion
PM2.6
RAMS 16.7
30 °C
Nafion
PM2.6 TEA & CIF
denuders With
particle
concentrator
Both RAMS and CAMM under-measured ambient PM2.6.
CAMM - (0.70 ± 0.06) HI + (0.16 ± 0.96); R2 - 0.87;
N - 22
SES-TEOM - (1.0 ± 0.10) HI + (-0.68 ± 1.74);
Radiance Research M903 n/a
n/a
Nafion
bscat
R2 - 0.89; N - 15
Radiance Research M903 n/a
n/a
None
bscat
BALTIMORE SUPERSITE, MD; 05/17/01 to 06/11/01. Located near;
1 freeway and bus yard.
Lee et al.73
SAMPLER FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
FILTER TYPE
DENUDER
Radiance Research M903dryed - (0.65 ± 0.02) Radiance
July 2009
A-27
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Site 1 Period / Sampler / Configuration
Summary of Findings
RAAS-100 PM2.1, FRM 16.7
Teflon
None
Research M903no dryer + (1.80 ± 0.20); R2 - 0.75,
suggesting influence from particle-bound water.
High correlation (R2 - 0.75) between Radiance Research
CONTINUOUS SAMPLER FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
INLET
TEMPERATURE
DRYER
OTHER
M903s.
Poor correlation among the continuous instruments.
SESTEOM 16.7
35 °C
Nafion
PM2.6
Radiance Research M903s did not follow PM2.6
concentrations measured by other continuous
instruments.
CAMM 0.3
n/a
Nafion
PM2.6
RAMS 16.7
30 °C
Nafion
PM2.6 TEA & CIF
denuders; No
particle
" CAMM - (0.32 ± 0.07) SES TEOM + (9.45 ± 1.61);
R2 - 0.14; N - 120
RAMS - (0.82 ± 0.10) SES-TEOM + (6.41 ± 2.09);
R2 - 0.38; N - 120
Radiance Research M903 n/a
n/a
Nafion
bscat
RAMS - (0.71 ± 0.12) CAMM + (11.3 ± 2.23);
Radiance Research M903 n/a
n/a
None
bscat
' R2 - 0.21; N - 120
CAMM - (0.80 ± 0.29) RAAS-100 FRM +
(¦0.83 ± 5.85); R2 - 0.60; N - 7
RAMS - (1.05 ± 0.12) RAAS-100 FRM + (4.80 ± 2.60);
R2 - 0.90; N - 11
SESTEOM - (0.86 ± 0.10) RAAS-100 FRM +
(2.96 ± 1.99); R2 - 0.90; N - 10
SEATTLE, WA; 01/28/01 to 02/21/01
Urban area near major highway and interstate, 8 km southeast of downtown.
SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
FILTER TYPE'
1
DENUDER"
MASS PM2.6
16.7
Teflon (n/a)
NayCO:; denuder
CONTINUOUS SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
INLET
TEMPERATURE
DRYER
OTHER
SESTEOM
16.7
30 °C
Nafion
PM2.6
CAMM
0.3
Ambient
Nafion
PM2.6
RAMS
16.7
30 °C
Nafion
PM2.6 TEA & CIF
denuders
Radiance Research M903
n/a
n/a
Nafion
bscat
Radiance Research M903
n/a
n/a
None
bscat
NEW YORK SUPERSITE, NY; 01/01/03 to 12/31/04
Urban site located at Queens College, NY, about 14 km west of Manhattan, within 2 km of freeways, and within
12 km of international airports. A rural site was located at Pinnacle State Park surrounded by golf course, picnic
areas, undeveloped forest lands, and no major cities within 15 km.
SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
FILTER TYPE'
1
DENUDER"
R&P-2025 PM2.6 FRM
16.7
Teflon (n/a)
None
R&P-2300 PM2.6
16.7
Teflon (n/a)
None
CONTINUOUS SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
INLET
TEMPERATURE
DRYER
OTHER
TEOM
16.7
50 °C
None
PM2.6
FDMS-TEOM
16.7
30 °C
Nafion
PM2.6
BAM
16.7
"smart" heater on @ RH >44%
PM2.6
Lee et al.108
Radiance Research M903dryed - 0.94 ± 0.00 Radiance
Research M903no dryer; R2 - 1.0.
Correlation of Radiance Research M903 vs. SES TEOM,
R2 - 0.80, while that of Radiance Research M903 with
CAMM was R2 - 0.84 and with RAMS was R2 - 0.72.
CAMM - (1.07 ± 0.05) RAMS + (1.03 ± 0.55);
R2 - 0.61
SES TEOM - (0.95 ± 0.03) RAMS + (1.24 ± 0.38);
R2 - 0.72
SES TEOM - (0.87 ± 0.03) CAMM + (0.55 ± 0.37);
R2 - 0.74
SES TEOM likely lost semi-volatile organic matter.
Continuous PM2.6 samplers were similar to filter PM2.6
sampler. Number of samples was small (~ 7).
Some SES TEOM mass values were less than MASS filter
values suggesting that loss of mass is likely for a SES-
TEOM at 30 °C, particularly during the cold season.
Schwab et al.67
FDMS-TE0M had operational difficulties resulting in low
data capture (65% at urban site and 57% at rural site).
BAM had data captures greater than 95% at both sites.
Urban site:
BAM - (1.02 ± 0.02) FDMS-TEOM + 1.72; R2 - 0.93;
n - 244
FDMS-TEOM - (1.25 ± 0.02) FRM - (0.63 ± 0.26);
R2 - 0.95; n - 238
BAM - (1.28 ± 0.03) FRM + (1.27 ± 0.38); R2 - 0.88;
n - 320
Rural site:
FDMS-TEOM - (1.09 ± 0.02) FRM - (0.004 ± 0.18);
R2 - 0.95; n - 349
PM2.6 FDMS-TEOM >FRM >TE0M50°C, suggesting
that FRM captured a fraction, but not all, of the volatile
components. TE0M50°C volatilizes PM2.6, particularly
during winter.
July 2009 A-28 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Site I Period / Sampler / Configuration
Summary of Findings
aFilter Manufacturer in parentheses - W: Whatman, Clifton, NJ; P: Pall-Gelman, Ann Arbor, Ml; S: Schleicher & Schnell. Keene, NH; nla: not available or not reported.
bNa2C(k Sodium carbonate; NaHC03: Sodium bicarbonate CIF: Charcoal Impregnated Filter; FEP: Fluorinated Ethylene Propylene copolymer; TEA: Triethanolamine; TSP: Total Suspended PM.
e37 mm filter.
d37-mm after-filter for stages smaller than 0.16 fjm and 47-mm for higher stages.
"Equivalence requires correlation coefficient (r) > 0.97, linear regression slope 1.0 ± 0.05 and an intercept 0 ± 1 /yglm3; Comparability requires r > 0.9 and linear regression slope equal 1 within 3
standard errors and intercept equal zero within 3 standard errors; Predictability requires r > 0.9. 91,112
Source: 'Chow (1995,077012); 2Watson and Chow (2001,157123);3 Watson et al. (1983, 045084); "Fehsenfeld et al. (2004,156432); 'Solomon et al. (2001,156993); 6Mikel (2001,156762);
'Mikel (2001,156762); "Watson et al. (1999,020949); 'Solomon and Sioutas (2006,156995); '"Graney et al. (2004, 053756); "Tanaka et al. (1998,157041); "Pancras et al. (2005,098120);
"John et al. (1988,045903); "Hering and Cass (1999, 084958); "Fritz et al. (1989, 077387); '"Hering et al. (1988, 036012); "Solomon et al. (2003,156994); '"Cabada et al. (2004,148859);
"Fine et al. (2003,155775); 2°Hogrefe et al. (2004, 099003); 2,Drewnick et al. (2003, 099160); 22Watson et al. (2005,157125); 23Ho et al. (2006,156552); 24Decesari et al. (2005,144536);2S
Mayol-Bracero et al. (2002, 045010); 26Yang et al. 2003;21 Tursic et al. (2006,157063); 2"Mader et al.(2004,156724); 29Xiao and Liu (2004, 056801); 30Kiss et al. (2002,156646); ''Cornell and
Jickells (1999,156367);32 Zheng et al. (2002, 026100); 33Fraser et al. (2002,140741);34 Fraser et al. (2003, 042231) 3sSchauer er al. (1996, 051162); 3sFine et al. (2004); 3,Yue et al. (2004);
3"Rinehart et al. (2006,115184); 39Wan and Yu (2006,157104); 40Poore (2000, 012839); "Fraser et al. (2003a); 42Engling et al. (2006,156422); 43Yu et al. (2005); 44Tran et al. (2000); 4sYao et al.
(2004,102213); 4sLi and Yu (2005,156692); "Henning et al. (2003,156539); 4"Zhang and Anastasio (2003,157182); "Enmenegger et al. (2007,156418); s0(Watson et al., 1989,157119);
"Greaves et al. (1985,156494); "Waterman et al. (2000,157116); s3Waterman et al. (2001,157117); s4Falkovich and Rudich (2001,156427); ssChow et al. (2007,156354); "Miguel et al.
(2004,123260); "Crinmins and Baker (2006, 097008); s"Ho and Yu (2004,156551); s9Jeon et al. (2001,016636); ""Mazzoleni et al. (2007, 098038); s,Poore (2000, 012839); ^Butler et al.
(2003); G3Chow et al. (2006c); "Russell et al. (2004, 082453); ssGrover et al. (2006); ssGrover et al. (2005, 090044); "Schwab et al. (2006b); ""Hauck et al. (2004); s9Jaques et al. (2004,
155878); '"Rupprecht and Patashrick (2003,157207); "Pang et al (2002, 030353); "Eatough et al. (2001,010303); ,3Lee et al. (2005b); ,4Lee et al. (2005,156680); ,sBabich et al. (2000,
156239); ,6Lee et al. (2005c); "Lee et al. (2005b); '"Anderson and Ogren (1998,156213);,9Chung et al. (2001,156357); ""Kidwell and Ondov (2004,155898); "'Lithgow et al. (2004,126616);
•"Weber et al. (2003,157129); B3Harrison et al. (2004); "Rattigan et al. (2006,115897); BSWittig et al. (2004,103413); ""Vaughn et al. (2005,157089); "'Chow et al. (2005b); "Weber et al
(2001, 024640); "Schwab et al. (2006a); "Lim et al. (2003,156697); 9,Watson and Chow (2002,037873); ^Venkatachari et al. (2006,105918); 93Bae et al. (2004a); "Arhami et al. (2006,
156224); 9sPark et al. (2005,156843); ""Bae et al. (2004b); 9,Chow et al. (2006a); ""Arnott et al. (2005); "Bond et al. (1999); '""Virkkula et al. (2005,157097); ""Petzold et al. (2002,156863);
,02Park et al. (2006); ""Arnott et al. (1999, 020650); ""Peters et al. (2001,017108); "Pitchford et al. (1997,156872); '""Rees et al. (2004,097164); ""Watson et al. (2000); '""Lee et al.(2005,
156680); ,09Hering et al. (2004,155837); ""Watson et al. (1998); '"Chakrabarti et al. (2004); "2Mathai et al. (1990,156741); '"Kidwell and Ondov (2001, 017092); '"Stanier et al. (2004);
'"Khlystov et al. (2005,156635); ""Takahama et al. (2004,157038); '"Chow et al. (2005,156348); ""Zhang et al. (2002); ""Subramanian et al. (2004, 081203); ,2°Chow et al. (2006b); "'Birch
and Cary (1996); ,22Birch (1998, 024953); ,23Birch and Cary (1996); ,24NI0SH (1996,156810); ,2sNI0SH (1999,156811); ,2"Chow et al. (1993); ,2,Chow et al. (2007); ""Ellis and Novakov (1982,
156416); ""Peterson and Richards (2002,156861); ""Schauer et al. (2003); "'Middlebrook et al. (2003, 042932); ,32Wenzel et al. (2003,157139);133Jimenez et al. (2003); ,34Phares et al. (2003,
156866); "sQin and Prather (2006,156895); ""Zhang et al. (2005); "'Bein et al. (2005,156265); ""Drewnick et al. (2004a); ""Drewnick et al. (2004b); "Lake et al. (2003,156669); ,4,Lake et
al. (2004,088411)
Table A-12. Summary of element and liquid water content measurement comparisons.
SITE/PERIOD/SAMPLER
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
College Park, MD; 11/18/1999 to 11/19/1999, 11/22/1999
Adjacent to a parking lot in the University of Maryland campus,
influenced by motor vehicles, coal-fired power plants and
incinerators —21 km southwest of site and regionally transported
material.
Concentrated Slurry/Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption
Spectrometry (GFAAS) (collectively known as Semi-
Continuous Elements in Aerosol Sampler, SEAS)
Ambient air is pulled in at a flow rate of 170 L/min. Particles are
grown using steam injection to about 3 to 4 pm in diameter, which
are then concentrated and separated from the air stream in the form
of a slurry using impactors. The slurry is collected in glass sample
vials, which are subsequently analyzed by GFAAS in the laboratory.
Kidwell and Ondov (2004,155898; 2001, 017092)
Overall collection efficiency (of the entire system) measured using latex particles was 40% for
particles initially 0.1 to 0.5 pm in diameter, increasing with size to 68% for particles 3 //m in
diameter. Major losses were in the virtual impactor major flow channel and in the condensers.
Six elements were detected simultaneously, limited by spectral interference and the minimum
detectable limit (MDL). Twelve elements (Al, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, In, As, Se, Cd, Sb, and Pb) were
measured.
MDLs ranged from 3.2 picogram (pg - 10'12 gram) to 440 pg.
Comparison with NIST standards showed good agreement, except for Al, Cr and Fe, due to poor
atomization. The method was valid for dissolved solutions, but not for large particles (>
Overall avg relative standard deviation (RSD) was 20 to 43% by error propagation, mainly due to the
collection and analytical efficiencies.
There were possible memory effects due to particle adhesion to impactor collection surfaces.
Lower MDLs may be possible through redesign and introduction of a wash cycle between samples. A
2.5 fjm inlet might improve analytical efficiency by removing coarse particles.
Pittsburgh Supersite, PA; 08/26/2002 to 09/02/2002
6 km east of downtown in a park on the top of a hill.
Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS)
Ambient air was concentrated using a PM2.6 inlet and a virtual
impactor. The concentrated stream was transported through a
Teflon tube to the sample cell of the LIBS system. The sample cell
was excited using a Nd: YAG laser. The resulting plasma was
collected and focused into a spectrometer, generating spectra
characteristic of different elements.
Lithgow et al. (2004,126616)
Calibration was done by sampling particle-laden streams with known metal concentrations. Good
linear fits with correlation coefficients 0.97 to 0.99
Seven metals (Na, Mg, Al, Ca, Cr, Mn, and Cu) were analyzed.
The MDLs were in the order of femtograms (fg - 10'16 gram) per sample.
This system has the capability of identifying the components, quantifying them and also giving a
particle size distribution. Mass was underestimated because of missing small particles.
July 2009
A-29
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
SITE I PERIOD I SAMPLER
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
Pittsburgh Supersite, PA; 07/01/2001 to 08/31/2001,
01/01/2002 to 07/01/2002.
6 km east of downtown in a park on the top of a hill.
Dry Ambient Aerosol Size Spectrometer (DAASS)
Measures the aerosol size distribution (using nano-SMPS, SMPS and
APS) alternatively, at ambient relative humidity (RH) (ambient
channel) and at low RH (18 ± 6%) (dry channel). A comparison of
the two size distributions provides information on the water
absorption and change in size due to RH.
Stanier et al. (2004, 095955); Khlystov et al. (2005,156635)
Measured water content ranging from less than 1 //g|m3 to 30 //g|m3, constituting < 5% to 100% of
the dry aerosol mass.
Small differences between dry and ambient channels of the DAASS. Number concentrations were
within 5% of each other.
Additional sources of error are associated with temperature differences between measured outdoor
ambient temperature and the temperature at which the ambient measurement channel was
maintained. Although the measurement system was placed in a ventilated enclosure, it was ~4 °C
higher than ambient temperature during July 2001. During winter, the system was maintained at a
minimum temperature of 9 °C, while the outdoor temperature dropped to -5 °C. This caused
differences in RH sensed by the system in the ambient channel versus the actual outdoor RH.
RH differences cause underestimation of the particle number at sizes < 200 nm and an
overestimation at sizes > 200 nm. This causes the volume growth factor to be higher by 2 to 14%,
with the highest bias occurring at high RH and low temperature (92% outside RH and -5 °C|.
The difference in temperature might also lead to evaporation of semi-volatile components such as
NH4N03. For the winter period, it was estimated that, for the worst case, the volume growth factor
would be underestimated by about 10% for 60 ¦ 90% RH.
Insufficient purging of dry air between the dry and ambient cycles (implying the need for supplemental
vacuum power during the vent stages) causes uncertainties in estimated growth factors. Correction
factors were between 0.97 and 1.03.
Water content estimated by DAASS can be used to evaluate the thermodynamic models. For the
Pittsburgh study, the models underestimated the water content by 37%.
Data from DAASS showed that the aerosol was wet even at ambient RH less than 30%.
Table A-13. Summary of PM2.5 l\IO3 measurement comparisons.
SITE I PERIOD I SAMPLER I CONFIGURATION
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
ATLANTA SUPERSITE, GA: 8/3/99 to 9/1/99 4 km NW of downtown, within 200 m of a bus maintenance yard and
several warehouse facilities, representative of a mixed commercial-residential neighborhood.
SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
FILTER TYPE1
DENUDER"
R&P-2000 FRM
16.7
Quartz (P)
None
RAAS-400
24
Nylon (P)
MgO
SASS
6.7
Nylon (P)
MgO
MASS-400
16.7
Teflon (P)-Nylon (P
NayCO:;
MASS-450
16.7
Quartz (P)
None
R&P-2300
10
Nylon (P)
Na2C03
VAPS
15
Polycarbonatec (front 81 back-up)
NayCO:;
URG-PCM
16.7
Teflon (P)-Cellulose-fiber (W
NayCO:!
ARA-PCM
16.7
Teflon (n/a)-Nylon (n/a)
NayCOii/Citric acid
PC-BOSS (TVA)
105
Teflon (W)-
Nylon (P)
CIF
PC-BOSS (BYU)
150
Teflon (W)-
Nylon (P)
CIF
PC-BOSS (BYU)
150
Quartz (P)-
CIF (S)
CIF
MOUDI-100
30
Teflon (n/a-
Quartz (n/a
None
Solomon et al
PM2.E N0:i from each sampler was compared to
the all-sampler avgs, called the filter relative
reference (filter RR) value. Overall agreements
were within 30-35% of filter RR.
Wide scatter from paired comparisons, possibly
due to volatilized NO3 , differences in denuder
design and filter types, and low concentrations
(close to analytical uncertainty).
A small positive artifact (few tenths of /yg/m3)
might be present when using Na2
CO:; impregnated filters, due to possible
collection (and subsequent oxidation) of HONO
and NO2 on carbonate-impregnated filters. In
addition, glycerol in Na2C03 coated denuders
may contaminate the filters downstream.
PM2.6 NOs" R&P-2000 FRM and M0UDI-100
samplers are consistently lower than other
samplers.
Weber et al.82
Hourly PM2.6 N0:i were compared to all-sampler
averages (continuous RR), similar to the
approach used for integrated filter samplers.
Overall agreements were within ± 20-30%
(or ± 0.2 /yg/m3) except for ARA-N.
Except for ARA N, good correlations
(R2 - 0.70 to 0.90) were found during the
July 2009
A-30
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
SITE I PERIOD I SAMPLER / CONFIGURATION
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
CONTINUOUS SAMPLER FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
DENUDER
ANALYSIS METHOD"
ADI-N 1
Activated Carbon
NOx Chemiluminescence
ARAN 3
Potassium iodide (Kl)
and dual sodium
chlorite (NaCIOz)
NOx Chemiluminescence
PILS-IC 5
Two URG annular glass
denuders in series
containing citric acid
and CaC03
IC
ECN 16.7
Rotating annular wet
denuder system
IC
TT 5
Wet parallel plate
denuder
IC
PITTSBURGH SUPERSITE, PA; 7/1/01 to 8/1/02 6km east of downtown in a park on the top of a hill
SAMPLER FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
FILTER TYPE1
DENUDER"
MOUDI-110 30
Teflon (W
Teflon (W)-
None
CMU 16.7
Nylon (W)
MgO/Citric acid
R&P-2000 FRM 16.7
Teflon (W)
None
second half of the study. The poor performance
of ARA N was probably due to an inefficient
denuder (25-60% efficient) resulting in high
background.
Large discrepancies between continuous and
filter RR, probably due to low ambient
concentrations (study avg - 0.5 /yg/m3) near
the detection limit ( — 0.1 //g|m3, except for
ARA-N, which had 0.5//g|m3).
The ARA-N was within 13%, ADI-N, ECN and
PILS-IC within 18% and TT within 26% of filter
RR (all < 0.2/yg/m3 difference).
Filter samples showed more variability (Relative
Standard Deviation, RSD - 22%) than
continuous measurements (RSD - 13%). This is
probably due to sampling artifacts in filter
samples; NOs'volatilization in continuous
monitors is expected to be minimal due to
shorter averaging times and rapid stabilization
in solutions.
Cabada et al.Is; Takahama et al.116
More than 70% (— 0.5 /yglm3) of NO3 mass
was lost from MOUDI samplers during summer.
MOUDI NOs - 0.27 CMU; R2 - 0.40; Summer
MOUDI NOs - 0.99 CMU; R2 - 0.49; winter
85
Wittig et al.
Avg conversion efficiency to NOx (tested using
NH4NO3 solution) was 0.85 ± 0.08. Gas
analyzer efficiency was stable at 0.99 ± 0.04.
Corrections were made for instrument offset,
software calculation error, conversion
efficiency, gas analyzer efficiency, vacuum
drift, and sample flow drift. The overall avg
correction was 8%, ranging from -62% to 93%.
Data Recovery > 80%. Data loss was
associated with vacuum pump failures and
excessive flash strip breakage.
R&P-8400N - 0.83 CMU + 0.20//gfm3;
R2 - 0.84
Under estimation in the R&P-8400N could be
due to incomplete particle collection or
incomplete conversion of various forms of NO3'.
Used co-located filter measurements for final
calibration.
FRESNO SUPERSITE, CA and other CRPAQS sites; 12/2/99 to 2/3/01
Located 5.5 km northeast of downtown in a mixed residential-commercial neighborhood.
SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
FILTER TYPE1
DENUDER
DRISFS
113
Quartz (Pellulose
AI2O3
RAAS-400
24
Quartz (P)-Nylon (P)
NayCO:!
RAAS-400
24
Quartz (P)-Quartz (P)
None
RAAS-100 FRM
16.7
Quartz (P)
None
CONTINUOUS SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
DENUDER
ANALYSIS METHOD"
R&P-8400N
Activated Carbon
NOx Chemiluminescence
Chow et al.87
Maximum NO3' volatilization was observed
during summer (Jun - Aug), while the lowest
volatilization was observed during winter
(Dec-Feb).
Seasonal avg volatilized NO3' in particulate NO3'
(PN0:i , the sum of non-volatilized and volatilized
NO3) ranged from less than 10% during winter
to more than 80% during summer.
Volatilized NH4NO3 accounted for 44% of actual
PM2.E mass (i.e., measured mass plus volatilized
NH4NO3) in Fresno during summer.
Front-quartz non-volatilized NO3' concentrations
were similar for DRISFS (0.52 ± 0.26 /yglm3)
July 2009 A-31 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
SITE I PERIOD I SAMPLER / CONFIGURATION
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
FILTER TYPE1
DENUDER
PC-BOSS
150
Teflon (W)- Nylon (P)
CIF
CONTINUOUS SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
DENUDER
ANALYSIS METHOD"
R&P-8400N
5
Activated Carbon
NOx Chemiluminescence
Dionex-IC
5
Parallel plate wet denuder
IC
and RAAS-100 FRM (0.81 ± 0.33 //g/m3) for
warm months (May-Sep). With preceding
denuders, the DRI-SFS
PNO3 concentration (3 ± 1.9 //g/m3) was much
higher than the RAAS100 FRM NO3', suggesting
that the FRM sampler removed gaseous nitric
acid (HNO3) resulting in NO3' volatilization. FRM
Teflon-membrane filters are subject to similar
N03'losses.
Chow etal.117
High correlation (R2 >0.90) between 24-h avg
R&P-8400N NOs and SFS filter NOs"
concentrations, but R&P-8400N NOs'was 7 to
25% lower than filter NO3'.
Limited comparison (n < 15) with filter
samples at Bakersfield showed that the slopes
were close to unity during early morning hours,
while they decreased during the afternoon
hours, indicating possible loss of NO3 by the
R&P-8400N instrument.
The R&P-8400N required substantial
maintenance and careful operation.
Grover et al.65
Dionex-IC NOs - (0.71 ± 0.04) PC-BOSS NOs
+ (3.2 ± 1.1); R2 - 0.91; n - 29
R&P-8400N - (1.10 ± 0.06) PC-BOSS NOs ¦
(0.8 ± 1.8); R2 - 0.93; n - 29
R&P-8400N - (0.55 ± 0.01) Dionex-IC +
(1.4 ± 1.8); R2 - 0.75; n - 493
R&P-8400N measured less than DIONEX IC,
particularly at high RH. R&P-8400N may suffer
incomplete flash vaporization under conditions
of high RH.
BALTIMORE SUPERSITE, MD; 2/14/02 to 11/30/02
Adjacent to a parking lot in the University of Maryland campus, influenced by motor vehicles, coal-fired power plants and
incinerators —21 km southwest of site and regionally transported material.
SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
FILTER TYPE1
DENUDER
SASS
6.7
Nylon (n/a)
MgO
CONTINUOUS SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
DENUDER
ANALYSIS METHOD"
R&P-8400N
Activated Carbon
NOx Chemiluminescence
Harrison etal.33
Corrections were made to R&P-8400N data for
software calculation error, conversion
efficiency, gas analyzer efficiency, vacuum drift
and sample flow drift.
The relative uncertainty of R&P-8400N
measurements averaged 8.7%, ranging from
6.3% to 23%.
Data capture >95%.
R&P-8400N underestimated SASS filter NO3' by
July 2009 A-32 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
SITE I PERIOD I SAMPLER / CONFIGURATION
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
~ 33%, attributed to variations in conversion
efficiency, matrix effects, and impaction
efficiency. This suggested a true conversion
efficiency of 68% as compared to an avg
conversion efficiency of R&P-8400N to NOx
(tested using potassium nitrate solution) of
0.90 ± 0.04.
Large errors occurred when the concentrations
were near the detection limit, when the
temperature difference (between instrument
and ambient) was large, and when the ambient
relative humidity (RH)was < 40%. Ridged
flash strips produced lower dissociation losses
than flat strips.
Reliable measurements were obtained when the
instrument-outdoor temperature differences
were minimal and when grooved/ridged flash
strips were used. A co-located filter
measurement was used for final corrections.
NEW YORK SUPERSITE, NY; 06/29/01 to 08/05/01 and 07/09/02 to 08/07/02
Urban site located at Queens College, NY, about 14 km west of Manhattan, within 2 km of freeways, and within 12 km of
international airports. Rural site located at Whiteface mountain, 600 m above sea level, in a clearing surrounded by
deciduous and evergreen trees and no major cities within 20 km of the site.
SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
FILTER TYPE1
DENUDER
R&P-2300
10
Nylon (n/a)
Na2C03
CONTINUOUS SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
DENUDER
ANALYSIS METHOD"
R&P-8400N
5
Activated Carbon
NOx Chemiluminescence
PILS-IC
5
Na2C03 and citric
acid
IC
AMS
0.1
None
Mass Spectrometry
NEW YORK SUPERSITE, NY; 10/01 to 07/05 (urban), 07/02 to 07/05 (rural) Urban site located at a school in South
Bronx, NY in a residential area, within a few kilometers away from major highways and a freight yard (experiencing
significant truck traffic). Rural site located at Whiteface mountain, 600 m above sea level, in a clearing surrounded by
deciduous and evergreen trees and no major cities within 20 km of the site.
SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
FILTER TYPEA
DENUDER"
R&P-2300
10
Nylon (n/a)
NayCO:!
TEOM-ACCU
16.7
Zefluor
None
CONTINUOUS SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
DENUDER
ANALYSIS METHOD"
R&P-8400N
5
Activated Carbon
NOx Chemiluminescence
Hogrefe et al.20
Data completeness: 86 ¦ 88% for R&P-8400N,
94 -98% for AMS, and 65 ¦ 70% for PILS-IC.
Some PILS measurements were invalidated
owing to larger aqueous flow caused by bigger
tubing. Larger aqueous flow and inconsistent
water quality affected NO3' concentrations.
R&P-8400N NO3' was lower than R&P-2300
filter NOs". PILS-IC was within 5% of R&P-2300
filter NO3' concentrations.
At the urban site, AMS was within 10% of the
filter N03concentration. At the rural site, AMS
had a slope of 0.51 and R2 of 0.46, compared
with filter NO3'.
Rattigan et al.84
Data capture was more than 94%.
Data were adjusted for span and zero drifts,
conversion efficiency, flow drift, and blanks.
R&P-8400N NO3' was systematically lower
than R&P-2300 filter N03over all concentration
ranges, except at < 1 /yglm3.
Urban: R&P-8400N - 0.59 R&P-2300 NOs +
0.28; R2 - 0.88; n - 305
Rural: R&P-8400N - 0.73 R&P-2300 NOs +
0.01; R2 - 0.90; n — 161; however
concentrations were low with 95% of data
< 1 Z^g/m3.
Required weekly or biweekly maintenance by
trained personnel.
LOS ANGELES SUPERSITE, CA; 7/13/01 to 9/15/01 (Rubidoux) and 9/15/01 to 2/10/02 (Claremont)
Multiple sampling locations in the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB), including urban "source" sites and downwind "receptor"
sites.
SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
FILTER TYPEa
DENUDER'
MOUDI
30
Teflon (P
None
HEADS
10
Teflon (n/a) ¦
Carbonate
GF-GF
Fine et al.19
MOUDI - 0.68 HEADS: R2 - 0.88
ADI-N Sized - 0.80 HEADS: R2 - 0.79
ADI-N Sized - 1.12 MOUDI: R2 - 0.53
ADI-N NO3' showed better agreement with
HEADS at lower concentrations, the ADI-N
deviated (biased low) from the HEADS
concentrations at higher NO3 concentrations.
July 2009
A-33
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
SITE I PERIOD I SAMPLER I CONFIGURATION
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
This deviation was attributed to NO3'
vaporization, loss of NO3' associated with
particles less than 0.1 fjm not collected by the
ADI-N sampler, or loss of particles in the ADI-N
inlet tubing.
The underestimation of NO3' by MOUDI
compared to HEADS may be due to NO3'
volatilization from MOUDI stages, since SO42'
comparisons showed MOUDI to explain 85% of
HEADS S042"
ADI-N and MOUDI showed better correlation
(R2 - 0.67) for the 1 to 2 /jm size range NO3
relative to other size ranges (R2< - 0.56).
This is possibly due to NO3' in the form of non-
volatilized sodium nitrate (NaN03) than
volatilized NH4NO3 in the 1-2 //m size range.
Single particle analysis also indicated this
possibility of NaN03 in the 1 to 2/ym range.
Grover et al.66
R&P-8400N - (0.65 ± 0.07) PC-BOSS +
(3.3 ± 2.4); R2 - 0.73; n - 31
At higher concentrations (No numerical value
reported), R&P-8400N N03'was lower than PC-
BOSS NO3 , possibly due to incomplete
volatilization of NH4NO3 in R&P-8400N at
higher concentrations (and higher relative
humidity).
At the urban site, the continuous instruments
correlated well with filter NO3 - measurements
and among themselves (R2 a 0.89). At the rural
site, R2 ranged from 0.61 to 0.83, except for
the AMS versus R&P2300 comparison, with an
R2 of 0.46.
SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
FILTER TYPE"
DENUDER"
PC-BOSS
150
Teflon (W)-Nylon (P)
CIF
CONTINUOUS SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
DENUDER
ANALYSIS METHOD"
R&P-8400N
5
Activated Carbon
NOx Chemiluminescence
R&P-8400N
5
Activated Carbon
NOx Chemiluminescence
PILS-IC
5
Na2C03 and Citric acid
IC
AMS
0.1
None
Mass Spectrometry
July 2009 A-34 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
CONTINUOUS SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
DENUDER
ANALYSIS METHOD"
ADI-N Sized
0.9
Activated Carbon
NOx Chemiluminescence
RUBIDOUX, CA; 07/01/03 to 07/31/03
Located in the eastern section of SoCAB in the north-west corner of Riverside County, 78 km downwind of the central Los
Angeles metropolitan area and in the middle of the remaining agricultural production area in SoCAB.
-------
SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
FILTER TYPE"
DENUDED
aFilter Manufacturer in parenthesis - W: Whatman, Clifton, NJ; P: Pall-Gelman, Ann Arbor, Ml; S: Schleicher & Schnell. Keene, NH; nla: not available or not reported.
bAb03: Aluminum oxide; GF: Na2C03 impregnated Glass Fiber Filters; IC: Ion chromatography; MgO: Magnesium oxide; Na2C03: Sodium carbonate; NaHC03: Sodium bicarbonate NOx: Oxides of
nitrogen; CIF: Charcoal Impregnated Filter; FEP: Fluorinated Ethylene Propylene copolymer; TEA: Triethanolamine; TSP: Total Suspended PM.
cNa2C03 impregnated.
d37-mm filter.
Source: 'Chow (1995,077012); 2Watson and Chow (2001,157123);3 Watson et al. (1983, 045084); "Fehsenfeld et al. (2004,150432); 'Solomon et al. (2001,150993); sMikel (2001,150702);
'Mikel (2001,150702); "Watson et al. (1999,020949); 'Solomon and Sioutas (2000,150995); '"Graney et al. (2004, 053750); "Tanaka et al. (1998,157041); "Pancras et al. (2005,098120);
"John et al. (1988,045903); "Hering and Cass (1999, 084958); "Fritz et al. (1989, 077387); '"Hering et al. (1988, 030012); "Solomon et al. (2003,150994); "Cabada et al. (2004,148859);
"Fine et al. (2003,155775); 2°Hogrefe et al. (2004, 099003); 2,Drewnick et al. (2003, 099100); 22Watson et al. (2005,157125); 23Ho et al. (2000,150552); 24Decesari et al. (2005,144530);2S
Mayol-Bracero et al. (2002, 045010); 2sYang et al. 2003;21 Tursic et al. (2000,157003); 2"Mader et al.(2004,150724); 29Xiao and Liu (2004, 050801); 3°Kiss et al. (2002,150040); 3,Cornell and
Jickells (1999,150307);32 Zheng et al. (2002, 020100); 33Fraser et al. (2002,140741);34 Fraser et al. (2003, 042231) 3sSchauer er al. (1990, 051102); 3sFine et al. (2004); 3,Yue et al. (2004);
3BRinehart et al. (2000,115184); 39Wan and Yu (2000,157104); 40Poore (2000, 012839); "Fraser et al. (2003a); 42Engling et al. (2000,150422); 43Yu et al. (2005); 44Tran et al. (2000); 4sYao et al.
(2004,102213); 4sLi and Yu (2005,150092); "Henning et al. (2003,150539); 4"Zhang and Anastasio (2003,157182); "Enmenegger et al. (2007,150418); s0(Watson et al., 1989,157119);
"Greaves et al. (1985,150494); "Waterman et al. (2000,157110); s3Waterman et al. (2001,157117); s4Falkovich and Rudich (2001,150427); ssChow et al. (2007,150354); "Miguel et al.
(2004,123200); "Crinmins and Baker (2000, 097008); s"Ho and Yu (2004,150551); s9Jeon et al. (2001,010030); 60Mazzoleni et al. (2007, 098038); 6,Poore (2000, 012839); ^Butler et al.
(2003); s3Chow et al. (2000c); "Russell et al. (2004, 082453); ssGro»er et al. (2000); ssGro»er et al. (2005, 090044); "Schwab et al. (2000b); ""Hauck et al. (2004); s9Jaques et al. (2004,
155878); '"Rupprecht and Patashrick (2003,157207); "Pang et al (2002, 030353); "Eatough et al. (2001,010303); ,3Lee et al. (2005b); ,4Lee et al.(2005,150080); ,sBabich et al. (2000,
150239); ,sLee et al. (2005c); "Lee et al. (2005b); '"Anderson and Ogren (1998,150213);,9Chung et al. (2001,150357); ""Kidwell and Ondo» (2004,155898); "'Lithgow et al. (2004,120010);
""Weber et al. (2003,157129); "'Harrison et al. (2004); "Rattigan et al. (2000,115897); "sWittig et al. (2004,103413); ""Vaughn et al. (2005,157089); "'Chow et al. (2005b); ""Weber et al
(2001, 024040); "Schwab et al. (2000a); 90Lim et al. (2003,150097); 9,Watson and Chow (2002,037873); ^Venkatachari et al. (2000,105918); 93Bae et al. (2004a); "Arhami et al. (2000,
150224);95Park et al. (2005,150843); ""Bae et al. (2004b); 9,Chow et al. (2000a); ""Arnott et al. (2005); "Bond et al. (1999); '""Virkkula et al. (2005,157097); ""Petzold et al. (2002,150803);
,02Park et al. (2000); ,raArnott et al. (1999, 020050); ""Peters et al. (2001); ,osPitchford et al. (1997,150872); ,osRees et al. (2004, 097104); ""Watson et al. (2000); ,0BLee et al.(2005,150080);
'""Hering et al. (2004,155837); ""Watson et al. (1998); '"Chakrabarti et al. (2004); "2Mathai et al. (1990,150741); '"Kidwell and Ondo» (2001,017092); '"Stanier et al. (2004); '"Khlystov et
al. (2005,150035); ""Takahama et al. (2004,157038); '"Chow et al. (2005,150348); ""Zhang et al. (2002); ""Subramanian et al. (2004, 081203); ,20Chow et al. (2000b); "'Birch and Cary
(1990);122Birch (1998,024953); ,23Birch and Cary (1990); ""NIOSH (1990,150810); "sNI0SH (1999,150811); ,2"Chow et al. (1993); "'Chow et al. (2007); ""Ellis and No»ako» (1982,150410);
""Peterson and Richards (2002,150801); ""Schauer et al. (2003); ,3,Middlebrook et al. (2003,042932); ,32Wenzel et al. (2003,157139);133Jimenez et al. (2003); "4Phares et al. (2003,150800);
"sQin and Prather (2000,150895); "Zhang et al. (2005); "'Bein et al. (2005,150205); ""Drewnick et al. (2004a); ""Drewnick et al. (2004b); ""Lake et al. (2003,150009); "'Lake et al. (2004,
088411)
Table A-14. Summary of PM2.5 SO42 measurement comparisons
SITE/PERIOD/SAMPLER/ CONFIGURATION
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
ATLANTA SUPERSITE, GA: 08/03/99 to 09/01/99
4 km NW of downtown, within 200 m of a bus maintenance yard and several warehouse facilities, representative of;
mixed commercial-residential neighborhood.
SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
FILTER TYPE1
DENUDER"
R&P-2000 FRM
16.7
Quartz (P)
None
RAAS-400
24
Teflon (P)
None
SASS
6.7
Teflon (P)
None
MASS-450
16.7
Quartz (P)
None
R&P-2300
10
Quartz (P)
NOne
VAPS
15
Quartz (P)
XAD-4
URG-PCM
16.7
Teflon (P)-Cellulose-fiber (W
ARA-PCM
16.7
Teflon (n/a)
NayCOii/Citric acid
ARA-PCM
16.7
Nylon (n/a)
Na2C03/Citric acid
PC-BOSS (TVA)
105
Teflon (W)
CIF
PC-BOSS (TVA)
105
Quartz (P)
CIF
PC-BOSS (BYU)
150
Teflon (W)
CIF
PC-BOSS (BYU)
150
Quartz (P)
CIF
MOUDI-100
30
Teflon (n/a-
Quartz (n/a
None
Solomon et al.17
PM2.6 S042'from each sampler was compared to all-
sampler averages, called the filter relative reference
(filter RR) value. The samplers agreed to within
10% of filter RR, except for the PC-BOSS (TVA)
and MOUDI-100.
While avg mass was within 10%, daily variability
was >50% of filter RR.
All samplers, except for the PC-BOSS (TVA),
correlated well (R2 > 0.90) with daily filter RR.
PC-BOSS (TVA) had instrument leaks.
The R&P-2000 FRM, on avg, agreed within 1% of
filter RR.
MOUDI-100 was ~ 13% low compared to filter RR.
Weber et al.32; Zhang et al.113
Hourly PM2.6 S042'were compared to all-sampler
averages (continuous RR), similar to the approach
used for filter samplers. Overall agreement was
within 16% or 2 /yglm3.
Good correlations (R2 - 0.76 to 0.94) were found
during the second half of the study, except for TT
versus ADI.
Good correlation (R2 - 0.84) was found between
continuous and filter-based S042': Continuous
RR - (1.15 ±0.15), Filter RR +(0.41 ± 1.73)
Variability among continuous SO42 instruments
July 2009
A-35
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
SITE/PERIOD/SAMPLER/ CONFIGURATION
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
CONTINUOUS SAMPLER
FLOW RATE
(L/min)
DENUDER
ANALYSIS METHOD"
ADI-S
2.7
Activated Carbon
SO2, UV Fluorescence
PILS-IC
5
Two URG annular glass
denuders in series
containing citric acid 81
CaC03
IC
ECN
16.7
Rotating annular wet
denuder system
IC
TT
5
Wet parallel plate denuder
IC
(RSD - 13%) was similar to that for NO3
instruments. Filter sample variability was low
(RSD - 8%) indicating more uniformity among
samplers.
The ECN and TT instruments were within 15%,
PILS-IC was within 20% and ADI-S was within
26% of filter RR.
PITTSBURGH SUPERSITE, PA; 070/1/01 to 08/01/02
6km east of downtown in a park on the top of a hill
SAMPLER
FLOW RATE
FILTER TYPE1
DENUDER'
(L/MIN)
MOUDI-110
30
Teflon (W
None
CMU
16.7
Teflon (W)
MgO/Citric acid
R&P-2000 FRM 16.7 Teflon (W) None
CONTINUOUS SAMPLER FLOW RATE DENUDER ANALYSIS METHOD"
(L/min)
R&P-8400S 5 Activated Carbon SO2 UV Fluorescence
Cabada et al„ ls; Takahama et al„ 116
MOUDI S042" 0.80 CMU; R2 - 0.95; Summer
MOUDI S042" 0.97 CMU; R2 - 0.48; winter
Wittig et al.85
Avg conversion efficiency to SO2 (tested using
ammonium sulfate [(NHihSOi] solution) was
0.65 ± 0.07. Gas analyzer efficiency was stable at
0.99 ± 0.06.
Corrections were made for instrument offset,
software calculation error, conversion efficiency,
gas analyzer efficiency, vacuum drift, and sample
flow drift. The overall correction was, on avg, -1 %
and ranged from -90% to 100% for individual
samples.
Data Recovery > 90%. Data loss was associated
with vacuum pump failures or excessive flash strip
breakage.
R&P-8400S (S042 ) - 0.71 CMU + 0.42/yg/m3;
R2 - 0.83
Underestimation is attributed to incomplete particle
collection or incomplete conversion of various forms
of S042"
Used co-located filter measurements for final
calibration.
LOS ANGELES SUPERSITE, CA; 07/13/01 to 09/15/01 (Rubidoux) and 09/15/01 to 02/10/02 (Claremont)
Multiple sampling locations in the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB), including urban "source" sites and downwind
"receptor" sites.
Fine et al.19
MOUDI explained 85% of HEADS SO42 (R2 - 0.89;
n - 40)
SAMPLER
FLOW RATE
FILTER TYPE1
DENUDER
(L/MIN)
MOUDI
30
Teflon (P
None
HEADS
10
Teflon (n/a) -GFC-GFC
Carbonate
NEW YORK SUPERSITE, NY; 06/29/01 to 08/05/01 and 07/09/02 to 08/07/02 Drewnick et al. Hogrefe et al.20
Urban site located at Queens College, NY, about 14 km west of Manhattan, within 2 km of freeways, and within 12 pata comp|eteness- 89 ¦ 93% for R&P-8400S 94 ¦
km of international airports. Rural site located at Whiteface mountain, 600m above sea level, in a clearing surrounded gg% jor 81-98% for CASM and 65-70% for
by deciduous and evergreen trees and no major cities within 20 km of the site. PILS-IC
SAMPLER
FLOW RATE
(L/MIN)
FILTER TYPE1
DENUDER"
The urban site data showed good correlations
(R2 - 0.87 to 0.94) with slopes ranging from 0.97
R&P-2300
10
Nylon (n/a)
NayCO:!
to 1.01. Al the rural site, the variability was large
(R2 - 0.73 to 0.91) with slopes ranging from 0.76
SCS
42
Zefluor (n/a)
None
to 1.32. SO4 from PILS-IC was overestimated by
July 2009
A-36
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
SITE/PERIOD/SAMPLER/ CONFIGURATION
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
TEOM-ACCU
16.7
Zefluor (n/a)
None
CONTINUOUS SAMPLER
FLOW
RATE
(L/min)
DENUDER
ANALYSIS METHOD"
R&P-8400S
5
Activated Carbon
SO2 UV Fluorescence
PILS-IC
5
Na2C03 and Citric acid
IC
AMS
0.1
None
Mass Spectrometry
CASM
5
Na2C03 and Carbon and a
Nafion dryer
SO2 UV Fluorescence
~ 25% when compared to the AMS at the rural
site.
Filter samples were within 5% of each other,
except for comparison of ACCU with R&P-2300 at
the rural site, with high correlations (R2 - 0.97 to
1.0). ACCU underestimated SO42'by —15%.
Continuous versus six-h SCS filter comparisons
showed high R2 (0.91 to 0.95) at the urban site.
Continuous instruments consistently measured
lower SO42'concentrations compared to the SCS
filter measurements (slopes 0.68 to 0.73)
On avg, 85% of the filter-based S042'was measured
by the continuous instruments with consistent
relationships. At the rural site, PILS-IC
overestimated SO42' concentrations (slopes 1.11 to
1.15), AMS and R&P-8400S showed slopes of
0.71-0.74 against SCS and ACCU, while it ranged
from 0.53- 0.68 against R&P-2300.
Error estimates:
Sampling losses: 2-3% for AMS and PILS-IC, 5-10%
for R&P-8400S and none for CASM.
Continuous instruments probably experienced more
inlet transport losses (~ 25%) than filter samplers
due to longer inlet lines.
Small (< 2%) positive artifact was found in filters.
NEWYORK SUPERSITE, NY; 10/01 to 07/05 (urban), 07/02 to 07/05 (rural)
Urban site located at a school in South Bronx, NY in a residential area, within a few kilometers from major highways
and a freight yard (experiencing significant truck traffic). Rural site located at Whiteface mountain, 600m above sea
level, in a clearing surrounded by deciduous and evergreen trees and no major cities within 20 km of the site. The
study by Schwab et al.89 was based at a rural site located at Pinnacle State Park surrounded by golf course, picnic
areas and undeveloped forest lands and no major cities within 15 km.
INTEGRATED SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/MIN)
FILTER TYPE1
DENUDER"
R&P-2300
10
Nylon (n/a)
NayCO:!
TEOM-ACCU
16.7
Zefluor
None
CONTINUOUS SAMPLER
FLOW RATE (L/min)
DENUDER
ANALYSIS METHOD"
R&P-8400S
5
Activated Carbon
SO2 pulsed fluorescence
TE-5020
(07114104 to 11101104)
5
Na2C03
SO2 pulsed fluorescence
Rattigan etal.84
Data capture was above 85%. Data loss was
primarily due to frequent flash strip failures, every
2 weeks and without warning.
Data were adjusted for span and zero drifts,
measured conversion efficiency, flow drift, and
blanks.
Calibrations used aqueous standards of (NH4)2S04
and oxalic acid solution in 1: 4 ratio. Lower
fractions of oxalic acid showed lower conversion
efficiencies.
Urban South Bronx site:
R&P-8400S - 0.82 TEOM-ACCU + 1.15;
R2 - 0.84; n - 513
R&P-8400S - 0.74 R&P-2300 + 1.14; R2- 0.81;
n - 322
Rural Whiteface mountain:
R&P-8400S - 0.75 TEOM-ACCU + 0.22;
R2 - 0.95; n - 207
R&P-8400S - 0.78 R&P-2300 + 0.17;
R2 - 0.85; n - 198
Required weekly or biweekly maintenance by
trained personnel
Schwab et al.39
TE-5020 - 0.78 ACCU - 0.2; R2 - 0.94
Similar studies at St. Louis, MO, show slopes near
unity. This suggests that the instrument is sensitive
to aerosol composition.
Low maintenance and calibration requirements for
TE-5020 compared to PILS-IC and R&P-8400S.
July 2009 A-37 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
SITE/PERIOD/SAMPLER/CONFIGURATION
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
FRESNO SUPERSITE.CA; 12/01/03 to 12/23/03
Located 5.5 km northeast of downtown in a mixed residential-commercial neighborhood. Flow Sampler (L/min) Filter
a b
Type Denuder
SAMPLER FLOW RATE (L/MIN) FILTER TYPE1 DENUDER"
PC-BOSS 150 Teflon (W)-Nylon (P) CIF
Grover et al.65
Dionex-IC S042" (1.03 ± 0.03) PC-BOSS S04 +
(0.2 ± 0.3); R2 - 0.98; n - 27
R&P-8400S S042" (0.95 ± 0.05) Dionex-IC SO4 +
(0.3 ± 0.6); R2 - 0.68; n - 195
CONTINUOUS SAMPLER FLOW RATE (L/min) DENUDER ANALYSIS METHOD"
R&P-8400S 5 Activated Carbon SO2 pulsed fluorescence
Dionex-IC 5 Parallel plate wet IC
denuder
aFilter Manufacturer in parentheses - W: Whatman, Clifton, NJ; P: Pall-Gelman, Ann Arbor, Ml; S: Schleicher & Schnell. Keene, NH; nla: not available.
bAb03: Aluminum oxide; IC: Ion chromatography; CIF: Charcoal Impregnated Filter; FEP: Fluorinated Ethylene Propylene copolymer; MgO: Magnesium oxide; Na2C(k Sodium carbonate; NaHC03:
Sodium bicarbonate NOx: Oxides of nitrogen; SO2: Sulfur dioxide; TEA: Triethanolamine; TSP: Total Suspended PM; UV: Ultraviolet; XAD-4: Hydrophobic, non-polar polyaromatic resin.
eNa2C03 impregnated.
d37-mm filter.
Source: 'Chow (1995,077012); 2Watson and Chow (2001,157123);3 Watson et al. (1983, 045084); "Fehsenfeld et al. (2004,150432); 'Solomon et al. (2001,150993); sMikel (2001,150702);
'Mikel (2001,150702); "Watson et al. (1999,020949); 'Solomon and Sioutas (2000,150995); '"Graney et al. (2004, 053750); "Tanaka et al. (1998,157041); "Pancras et al. (2005,098120);
"John et al. (1988,045903); "Hering and Cass (1999, 084958); "Fritz et al. (1989, 077387); '"Hering et al. (1988, 030012); "Solomon et al. (2003,150994); '"Cabada et al. (2004,148859);
"Fine et al. (2003,155775); 2"Hogrefe et al. (2004, 099003); 2'Drewnick et al. (2003, 099100); 22Watson et al. (2005,157125); 23Ho et al. (2000,150552); 24Decesari et al. (2005,144530);2S
Mayol-Bracero et al. (2002, 045010); 2sYang et al. 2003;21 Tursic et al. (2000,157003); 2"Mader et al.(2004,150724); 29Xiao and Liu (2004, 050801); 3"Kiss et al. (2002,150040); ''Cornell and
Jickells (1999,150307);32 Zheng et al. (2002, 020100); 33Fraser et al. (2002,140741);34 Fraser et al. (2003, 042231) 3sSchauer er al. (1990, 051102); 3sFine et al. (2004); 3,Yue et al. (2004);
3BRinehart et al. (2000,115184); 39Wan and Yu (2000,157104); 40Poore (2000, 012839); "Fraser et al. (2003a); 42Engling et al. (2000,150422); 43Yu et al. (2005); 44Tran et al. (2000); 4sYao et al.
(2004,102213); 4sLi and Yu (2005,150092); "Henning et al. (2003,150539); 4"Zhang and Anastasio (2003,157182); "Enmenegger et al. (2007,150418); s0(Watson et al., 1989,157119);
"Greaves et al. (1985,150494); "Waterman et al. (2000,157110); s3Waterman et al. (2001,157117); s4Falkovich and Rudich (2001,150427); ssChow et al. (2007,150354); "Miguel et al.
(2004,123200); "Crinmins and Baker (2000, 097008); s"Ho and Yu (2004,150551); s9Jeon et al. (2001,010030); ""Mazzoleni et al. (2007, 098038); s,Poore (2000, 012839); ^Butler et al.
(2003); G3Chow et al. (2000c); "Russell et al. (2004, 082453); ssGrover et al. (2000); "Graver et al. (2005, 090044); "Schwab et al. (2000b); ""Hauck et al. (2004); s9Jaques et al. (2004,
155878); '"Rupprecht and Patashrick (2003,157207); "Pang et al (2002, 030353); ,2Eatough et al. (2001,010303); ,3Lee et al. (2005b); ,4Lee et al. (2005,150080); ,sBabich et al. (2000,
150239); ,GLee et al. (2005c); "Lee et al. (2005b); '"Anderson and Ogren (1998,150213);,9Chung et al. (2001,150357); ""Kidwell and Ondov (2004,155898); "'Lithgow et al. (2004,120010);
'"Weber et al. (2003,157129); "'Harrison et al. (2004); "Rattigan et al. (2000,115897); "sWittig et al. (2004,103413); ""Vaughn et al. (2005,157089); "'Chow et al. (2005b); ""Weber et al
(2001, 024040); ""Schwab et al. (2000a); ""Lim et al. (2003,150097); "'Watson and Chow (2002,037873); ""Venkatachari et al. (2000,105918); 93Bae et al. (2004a); "Arhami et al. (2000,
150224);95Park et al. (2005,150843); ""Bae et al. (2004b); 9,Chow et al. (2000a); 9"Arnott et al. (2005); "Bond et al. (1999); '""Virkkula et al. (2005,157097); '"'Petzold et al. (2002,150803);
""Park et al. (2000); ""Arnott et al. (1999, 020050); ""Peters et al. (2001); ,osPitchford et al. (1997,150872); '""Rees et al. (2004, 097104); ""Watson et al. (2000); '""Lee et al. (2005,150080);
'""Hering et al. (2004,155837); ""Watson et al. (1998); "'Chakrabarti et al. (2004); "2Mathai et al. (1990,150741); '"Kidwell and Ondov (2001,017092); '"Stanier et al. (2004); '"Khlystov et
al. (2005,150035); ""Takahama et al. (2004,157038); '"Chow et al. (2005,150348); ""Zhang et al. (2002); ""Subramanian et al. (2004, 081203); ,2°Chow et al. (2000b); "'Birch and Cary
(1990);122Birch (1998,024953); ,23Birch and Cary (1990); ""NIOSH (1990,150810); ,2sNI0SH (1999,150811); ,2"Chow et al. (1993); "'Chow et al. (2007); ""Ellis and Novakov (1982,150410);
""Peterson and Richards (2002,150801); ""Schauer et al. (2003); "'Middlebrook et al. (2003,042932); ,32Wenzel et al. (2003,157139); "'Jimenez et al. (2003); "4Phares et al. (2003,150800);
"sQin and Prather (2000,150895); ""Zhang et al. (2005); "'Bein et al. (2005,150205); ""Drewnick et al. (2004a); ""Drewnick et al. (2004b); ""Lake et al. (2003,150009); "'Lake et al. (2004,
088411)
Table A-15. Summary of PM2.5 carbon measurement comparisons.
SITE/PERIOD/SAMPLER/ CONFIGURATION
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
ATLANTA SUPERSITE, GA: 08/03/99 to 09/01/99
4 km NW of downtown, within 200 m of a bus maintenance yard and several warehouse facilities, representative
of a mixed commercial-residential neighborhood.
SAMPLER
FLOW RATE
(L/MIN)
FILTER
TYPE1
DENUDER"
ANALYSIS METHOD'
R&P-2000 FRM
16.7
Quartz (P)
None
NIOSH 5040-T0T
RAAS-400
24
Quartz (P)
None
NIOSH 5040-T0T
SASS
6.7
Quartz (P)-
Quartz (P)
None
NIOSH 5040-T0T
MASS-450
16.7
Quartz (P)
None
NIOSH 5040-T0T
Solomon et al.17
Organic Carbon (OC);
PM2.E OC from each sampler was compared to the all-
sampler avg, called the relative reference (RR) value.
The samplers agreed to within 20 to 50% of RR. Only
front filter OC is reported without artifact correction.
Denuded samplers showed lower OC (20 to 35%) than
RR, while non-denuded sampler OC was higher (5 to
35%).
Among non-denuded samplers, as filter face velocity
decreased, OC increased, with the exception of R&P-
2300.
July 2009
A-38
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
SITE/PERIOD/SAMPLER/ CONFIGURATION
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
R&P-2300
10
Quartz (P)-
Quartz (P)
None
NIOSH 5040-T0T
VAPS
15
Quartz (P)
XAD-4
NIOSH 5040-T0T
URG-PCM
16.7
Quartz (P)-
Quartz (P)
XAD-4
Front: NIOSH 5040-T0T;
Backup: custom-TOTd
ARA-PCM
16.7
Quartz (n/a)-
Quartz (n/a)
CIF
IMPROVETOR
PC BOSS (TVA)
150
Quartz (P)-
CIF (n/a)
CIF
Front: IMPROVE TOR;
Backup: TPV
PC BOSS (BYU)
150
Quartz (P)-CIF
(S)
CIF
TPB
MOUDI-100
30
Al Foilf-Quartz
(n/a
None
Custom-TOR to suit Alc
CONTINUOUS
SAMPLER
FLOW RATE
(L/min)
DENUDER
OC
EC
COMMENTS
ADI-C
2.7
Activated
Carbon
Not known
n/a
Part of SO42' instrument
W/CO2 non-dispersive
infrared (NDIR) analyzer;
data corrected for avg field
blank; OC - 2 oxidized OC
RU-OGI
16.1
None
700 in He
850 in 2% O2
TOT; Dynamic blank for
adsorption correction
R&P-5400
16.7
None
275 in air
750 in air
No pyrolysis correction
PSAP
1.26
None
babs@
565
nm
10m2/g factor
AE-16
4
None
babs@
880 nm
12.6 m2/g factor
OC positive artifacts ranged from 2 to 4/yg/m
EC:
PM2.E EC from each sampler was compared to the all-
sampler avg, called the relative reference (RR) value.
The samplers agreed to within 20 to 200% of RR.
TOT samples showed less EC than RR by 15 to 30%,
while TOR samples showed more EC than RR by 40 to
90%. PCBOSS (BYU) > RR value by 140%. EC by TOR
is —twice EC by TOT.
Major difference in EC is due to the carbon analysis
protocol and optical monitoring correction
(i.e., transmittance, reflectance).
Lim et al. (2003)
TC concentrations measured by the RU-OGI and R&P-
5400 correlated reasonably well (R2 - 0.83), with a
slope of 0.96. The ratio of the mean RU-OGI to mean
R&P-5400 TC was 1.02.
R&P-5400 OC was 8% lower than the RU-OGI
(R2 - 0.73), while the R&P-5400 EC was 20% higher
than RU-OGI (R2 - 0.74).
OC measured by ADI-C was lower than R&P-5400 and
RUOGI by 15% and 22%, respectively.
EC from PSAP and AE-16 correlated well (R2 - 0.97).
PSAP was lower by ~ 50%, compared with AE-16,
R&P-5400 and RU-OGI.
EC measured byAE-16was —12% higher than RU-
OGI. Calibration factors for the light absorption
instruments need to be adjusted for better correlation.
Calibration factor might be non-linear over the range of
absorbance measured.
The mean OC from R&P-5400 and RU-OGI were within
10% of filter RR values. Mean ADI-C OC was 14%
lower than filter RR OC.
EC from continuous instruments was 2-2.5 times filter
RR EC; continuous TC was also greater than filter RR
TC by 17% (R&P-400) to 27% (RU-OGI).
PITTSBURGH SUPERSITE, PA; 06/01/01 to 07/31/02
Six km east of downtown in a park on the top of a hill.
SAMPLER FLOW FILTER TYPE / PACK1 DENUDER ANALYSIS METHOD'
CMU Custom-1 16.7 Non-denuded Teflon (P/W)- None NIOSH 5040-T0T
sample Quartz (P) (QBT)
16.7 Non-denuded Quartz (P)-Quartz None NIOSH 5040-T0T
sample (P) (QBQ)
CMU Custom-2 16.7 Denuded sample Denuder-Quartz Activated Carbon NIOSH 5040-T0T
(P)-CIG (S)
16.7 Dynamicblank Teflon (P/W)- Activated Carbon NIOSH 5040-T0T
(DYN! Denuder-Quartz
(P)-CIG (S)
Subramanian et al.119
Particulate OC (POC) was estimated from denuded
sample (Quartz OC + CIG OC) after subtracting DYN
POC.
Denuder efficiency (1 -DYN POC/UDB POC) was
94 ± 3%. No seasonal variability or deterioration in
denuder performance was observed.
Positive artifact due to denuder breakthrough was
18.3 ± 12.5% of the denuded sample POC.
Negative artifact (CIGsample-CIGDYN) was, on avg,
6.3 ± 6.2% of POC.
Positive artifact was 34 ± 10% from QBT, and was
13 ±5% from QBQ. QBT > >QBQ.
July 2009
A-39
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
SITE/PERIOD/SAMPLER/ CONFIGURATION
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
16.7
Non-denuded
blank fUDBJ
Teflon (P/W)-
Quartz (P)-CIG
(S)
None
NIOSH 5040-T0T
QBT over-corrected the positive artifact by 20%. OC
volatilization from the front Teflon filter that
subsequently-adsorbed on the back-up quartz filter,
resulted in an overestimation of the positive artifact.
Non-denuded QBQ provided a more representative
estimate of the positive artifact on the non-denuded
front quartz filter for 24-h samples. However, it was
not suitable for 4-6 h samples, because the filters were
not in equilibrium with the air stream.
Positive artifact dominated when sampling with a non-
denuded quartz filter.
Comparison of 24-h avg non-denuded front quartz OC
versus denuded POC over the year showed an intercept
of 0.53/yg/m3, indicative of a positive artifact on
quartz filter samples.
The artifacts were higher in summer on an absolute
basis; however, they showed no seasonal variation
when expressed as a fraction of POC.
ST. LOUIS SUPERSITE, IL, MO; 01/01/02 to 12/31/02
Three km east of St. Louis, MO City center, also impacted by industrial sources, and located in a mixed residential
light commercial neighborhood.
SAMPLER
FLOW
RATE
(Lmin)
FILTER
TYPE/PACK1
DENUDER1
I
ANALYSIS METHOD'
University of
24
Quartz (P)
None
ACE Asia TOT
Wisconsin Custom-1
Denuder-Quartz
(P)
CIF
ACE Asia TOT
University of
Wisconsin Custom-2
24
Denuder-Quartz
(P)
CIF
ACE Asia TOT
Teflon (n/a)-
Denuder-Quartz
(P)
CIF
ACE Asia TOT
CONTINUOUS
SAMPLER
FLOW
RATE
(L/min)
DENUDER
OC
EC
COMMENTS
Sunset OCEC
8
CIF
340,
500,615,
870 °C in
100% He
550, 625, 700,
775, 850, 900
°C in 2% O2,
98% He
ACE Asia TOT; CH4 FID
detector
Bae et al. 93 96
Denuder breakthrough was 0.17 ± 0.15/yg/m3, and
constituted less than 5% of annual avg OC
concentration.
Non-denuded OC - (1.06 ± 0.02) x denuded OC +
(0.34 ± 0.10)
Equivalence of OC intercept and denuder breakthrough
implies that the low-level artifact is caused by denuder
breakthrough.
Non-denuded EC - (1.04 ± 0.03) x denuded EC +
(0.07 ± 0.03), indicating negligible EC artifact.
Results suggested higher summer-time OC artifact, on
an absolute basis.
Comparison of continuous Sunset TC and OC with 24-h
filter samples showed good correlations (R2) of 0.89
and 0.90, respectively.
Continuous Sunset TC in//g|m3 - (0.97 ± 0.02) x
filter TC + (0.83 ± 0.11), indicating comparability with
the filter measurements.
Continuous Sunset OC - (0.93 ± 0.02) x filter OC +
(0.94 ± 0.09)
Positive intercept was interpreted to be a blank
correction for the continuous measurements.
EC comparison was poor with large scatter in data
(R2 - 0.60), probably due to low EC concentrations
(avg - 0.70/yg/m3), close to the detection limit
(0.5/yg/m3).
FRESNO SUPERSITE, CA and other CRPAQS sites; 12/02/99 to 02/03/01, 12/1/03 to 11/30/04
Fresno Supersite was located 5.5 km northeast of downtown in a mixed residential-commercial neighborhood.
SAMPLER
FLOW
RATE
(Lmin)
FILTER TYPE/PACK1
DENUDER"
ANALYSIS METHOD'
DRI-SFS
113
Quartz (P)
None
IMPROVETOR
Teflon (P)-Quartz
None
IMPROVETOR
RAAS-400
24
(P) (QBT) Quartz (P)-
Quartz (P) (QBQ)
None
IMPROVETOR
RAAS-400
24
Quartz (P)-Quartz (P)
(QBQ)
XAD-4 / CIF
IMPROVETOR
Watson and Chow91; Chow et al.Chow et al.
12°; Watson et al.'; Parket al.102
Non-denuded RAAS-400 and RAAS-100 FRM measured
equivalent TC. DRI-SFS, RAAS-400 and RAAS-100
FRM samplers showed comparability for front filter TC,
OC and EC measurements.
Positive OC artifact was 1.62 ± 0.58/yglm3 (~ 24%
of non-denuded front quartz OC) from QBT, and
1.12 ± 0.91 //g/m3 (— 17% of non-denuded front
quartz OC) from QBQ. QBT >>QBQ
Results from CRPAQS showed, on avg, a positive OC
artifact of 34% (of the non-denuded front quartz OC)
from QBT and 17.5% (of the non-denuded front quartz
July 2009
A-40
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
SITE/PERIOD/SAMPLER/ CONFIGURATION
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
RAAS-100 FRM 16.7 Quartz (P)
None
IMPROVE TOR
CONTINUOUS
SAMPLER
FLOW RATE
(L/min)
DENUDER
OC EC
COMMENTS
R&P-5400
16.7
None
275 °C in air 750 °C in
air
No pyrolysis correction
Sunset OCEC
8.5
CIG
250,500,650, 650,750,
850 °C in He 850, 940
°C in 2%
O2 in He
Transmittance
MAAP
16.7
None
babs 0
670 nm
Transmittance 6.5 m2/g
factor
AE-16
6.8
None
babs 0
880 nm
Transmittance
14625/A m2/g factor, where
AE-21
6.8
None
babs 0
370, 880
nm
A is in nm
AE-31
6.8
None
babs @
370, 470,
520, 590,
660, 880
and 950
nm
DRI-PA
3
None
babs @
1047 nm
Absorption, 5 m2/g factor
SAMPLER
FLOW RATE
(L/min)
FILTER
TYPE/PACK1
DENUDER"
ANALYSIS METHOD'
PC-BOSS
150
Quartz (P)-CIG (S)t CIF
TPV
OC) from QBQ.
Positive artifact was higher during summer than winter.
Negative artifact was, on avg, 0.61 ± 0.58 /yglm3
(— 10% of POC) at Fresno. Over all the CRPAQS sites,
it ranged from 2.3% in winter to 11 % in summer, with
an avg of 4.9%.
Positive artifact is estimated to be 0.5 /yglm3.
No difference in denuded quartz backup OC was found
between using XAD and CIF denuders.
Comparison of R&P-5400 TC, OC, and EC against filter
samples showed poor correlation (R2 < 0.55).
TC from R&P-5400 was 40-60% higher than filter TC
by TOR. None of the R&P-5400 versus TOR filter
comparisons were comparable or predictable, due to
several frequent instrument malfunctions during the
experiment and the small data set (~ 35 data points).
IMPROVETOR EC was consistently 20-25% higher
than aethalometer BC.
IMPROVE TOR EC was comparable to MAAP BC.
Comparison of light absorption (babs) from DRI-PA (1047
nm), MAAP (670 nm), and AE (880 nm) analyzers with
the filter IMPROVE TOR EC, gave a crabs of 2.3, 5.5
and 10 m2fg, differing from the default conversion
factors of 5, 6.5, and 16.6 m2/g used for each
instrument at the specified wavelength.
Grover et al.65
R&P-5400 TC - (0.50 ± 0.01) Sunset TC +
(3.6 ± 1.5); R2 - 0.73; n - 480
Sunset TC - (0.63 ± 0.05) PC-BOSS TC +
(4.1 ± 3.2); R2 - 0.86; n - 29
R&P-5400 TC - (0.41 ± 0.02) PC-BOSS TC +
(6.7 ± 1.6); R2- 0.91; n - 29
CONTINUOUS
SAMPLER
R&P-5400
Sunset OCEC
FLOW RATE
(L/min)
DENUDER1 OC
EC
COMMENTS
16.7
None
375 °C in air 750 0C in No pyrolysis
air
8.0
CIG
250, 500, 650, 750, NIOSH 5040 T0T
650, 850 °C 850 °C in ND|R C02 detector
in He
2% 0? &
98% He
BALTIMORE SUPERSITE, MD; 02/15/2002 to 11/30/2002
East of downtown in an urban residential area. Within 91 m of bus maintenance facility.
SAMPLER
FLOW RATE
(L/min)
FILTER
TYPE/PACK1
DENUDER'
ANALYSIS METHOD'
SASS
6.7
Quartz (P)-
Quartz (P)
None
STNTOT
CONTINUOUS
SAMPLER
FLOW RATE
(L/min)
DENUDER"
OC EC
COMMENTS
Park et al.95
Data capture 93.8%
Compared to SASS, Sunset underestimated OC and EC
by 22% and ~ 11.5%, respectively.
Higher OC in SASS was attributed to the absence of a
denuder (i.e., positive artifact by gaseous adsorption)
and to temperature differences between the STNTOT
and Sunset TOT carbon analysis temperature
protocols.
EC discrepancy was probably related to the differences
July 2009
A-41
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
SITE/PERIOD/SAMPLER/ CONFIGURATION
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
Sunset OCEC
Carbon 600 °C, then 870 °C in TOT; CH4 FID detector;
870 °C in He 2% O2 in Denuder breakthrough ~
He 0.5 - 1 //g C/m3; Used 0.5
to correct OC
concentrations
in temperature protocol.
G rover et al.66
RUBIDOUX, CA; 07/13/03 to 07/26/03
Rubidoux is located in the eastern section of the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB) in the north-west corner of gunset gcEC TC - (0 90 + 0 06) PC-BOSS
Riverside County, 78 km downwind of the central Los Angeles metropolitan area and in the middle of the
remaining agricultural production area in SoCAB.
(2.0 ±2.1); R2 = 0.93; n = 21
SAMPLER
FLOW
RATE
(L/min)
FILTER
TYPE/PACK
a
DENUDER"
ANALYSIS METHOD0
PC-BOSS
150
Quartz (P)-CIG (S)
CIF
TPB (CIG heated to 450 °C in N2)
CONTINUOUS
SAMPLER
FLOW
RATE
(L/min)
DENUDER1'
OC
EC
COMMENTS
Sunset OCEC
8
CIF
n/a
n/a
TOT; NDIR detector; NIOSH 5040
protocol
Sunset OCEC
8
CIF
n/a
Not meas-
ured
TOT; has blank quartz filter before
entering analyzer. Used as "blank"
stream for quantifying OC artifacts;
3-step analysis only in He.
NEW YORK SUPERSITE, NY; 01/12/04 to 02/05/04
Urban site located at Queens College, NY, about 14 km west of Manhattan, within 2 km of freeways, and
within 12 km of international airports.
INTEGRATED
SAMPLER
FLOW
RATE
(L/min)
FILTER
TYPE/PACK
a
DENUDER"
ANALYSIS METHOD0
R&P-2300
10
Quartz
None
STN_TOT
CONTINUOUS
SAMPLER
FLOW
RATE
(L/min)
DENUDER"
OC
EC
COMMENTS
R&P-5400
16.7
None
340 °C
in air
750 °C in air
No pyrolysis correction
Sunset OCEC
n/a
CIF
600,
870 °C
in He
870 "Cat 10%
O2 in He
Transmittance
AE-20
n/a
None
babs @ 370,
880 nm
Transmittance, 14625/0 nf/g factor,
where D is in nm
AMS
n/a
None
n/a
n/a
~ 1 pm cut-point
Sunset TC was adjusted for carbon artifacts
measured by second (blank) instrument.
Venkatachari et al.
Regression of OC from Sunset OCEC against PM2.5
mass concentration yielded an intercept of
1.14 pg/m3, which was used as a measure of the
positive artifact on the Sunset data. The Sunset OC
data was corrected for this artifact.
AE-20 BC concentrations were -86% of Sunset EC
and R&P2300 filter EC concentrations.
AE-20 versus R&P-5400 showed high scatter.
Sunset Optical EC = 0.58 ± 0.05 Sunset Thermal
EC; R2 = 0.86; n = 506
Sunset Optical EC = 0.62 ± 0.05 AE-20 BC;
R2 = 0.96; n = 539
R&P-5400 TC tracked filter TC closely, but differed
widely for OC and EC.
Sunset OC = (0.75 ± 0.76) R&P-2300 OC +
(0.08 ±0.36); R2 = 0.67;n = 16
Sunset OC = (0.98 ±0.11) R&P-5400 OC -
(0.47 ±0.17); R2 = 0.44; n = 327
R&P-5400 OC = (0.60 ± 0.47) R&P-2300 OC +
(0.58 ±0.82); R2 = 0.58;n = 17
July 2009
A-42
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
RUBIDOUX, CA; 07/13/03 to 07/26/03
Rubidoux is located in the eastern section of the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB) in the north-west corner of
Riverside County, 78 km downwind of the central Los Angeles metropolitan area and in the middle of the
remaining agricultural production area in SoCAB.
Organic matter measurements by AMS showed
reasonable correlation (R2 = 0.76) with filter (R&P-
2300) OC, while being poorly correlated with
continuous OC by Sunset (R2 = 0.32) and R&P-
5400 (R2 = 0.36)
Sunset EC = (1.21 ± 0.44) R&P-2300 EC -
(0.03 ±0.13); R2 = 0.94; n = 16
Sunset EC = (1.35 ± 0.12) R&P-5400 EC +
(0.06 ±0.04); R2 = 0.61; n = 327
R&P-5400 EC = (0.49 ± 0.46) R&P-2300 EC +
(0.09 ±0.26); R2 = 0.77;n = 15
Sunset TC = (0.86 ± 0.39) R&P-2300 TC -
(0.06 ±0.69); R2 = 0.77;n = 16
Sunset TC = (1.31 ± 0.10) R&P-5400 TC -
(1.15 ±0.15); R2 = 0.59; n = 327
R&P-5400 TC = (0.77 ± 0.58) R&P-2300 TC +
(0.35 ±1.37); R2 = 0.83;n = 16
aFilter Manufacturer in parentheses - W: Whatman, Clifton, NJ; P: Pall-Gelman, Ann Arbor, Ml; S: Schleicher & Schnell. Keene, NH; nla: not available. QBT: quartz backup filter behind Teflon front
filter. QBQ: quartz backup filter behind Quartz front filter.
bAb03: Aluminum oxide; IC: Ion chromatography; CIF: Charcoal Impregnated Filter; CIG: Charcoal Impregnated Glass-Fiber Filter; FEP: Fluorinated Ethylene Propylene copolymer; MgO: Magnesium
oxide; Na2C03: Sodium carbonate; NaHC03: Sodium bicarbonate NOx: Oxides of nitrogen; SO2: Sulfur dioxide; TEA: Triethanolamine; TSP: Total Suspended PM; UV: Ultraviolet; XAD-4: (hydrophobic,
non-polar polyaromatic resin.
eNI0SH 5040_T0T: National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health Method 5040 Thermal Optical Transmittance Protocol.12,1,22, ]n m'0C: 250, 500, 050, 850 °C for 0C1, 0C2, 0C3, and
0C4 fractions, respectively, for 00, 00, 00, 90 sec respectively, in 100% He atmosphere. EC: 050, 750,850, 940 °C for EC1, EC2, EC3, and EC4 fractions, respectively, 30, 30, 30, > 120 sec
respectively, in 98% He and 2% O2 atmosphere. OPT: Pyrolysis correction by transmittance. IMPR0VE_T0R: Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments Thermal Optical Reflectance
Protocol. ""0C fractions: 120, 250,450, 550 °C for 001, 002, 003, and 0C4 fractions, respectively, until a well defined peak has evolved at each step, with a time limit of min 80 sec and max of
580 sec, in 100% He atmosphere. EC fractions: 550, 700, 800 °C for EC1, EC2, and EC3 fractions, respectively, until a well defined peak has evolved at each step, with a time limit of min 80 sec
and max of 580 sec, in 2% O2 and 98% He atmosphere. 0PR: Pyrolysis correction for pyrolyzed organic carbon (OP) by reflectance. 0C = 0C1 +0C2 + 0C3 + 0C4 + 0P EC = EC1+ EC2 + EC3-0P
TC = 0C + EC. IMPR0VE_A TOR: "' Note that as of May, 2007, the U.S. EPA is switching samples from the Speciation Trends Network thermal optical transmittance protocol to the IMPR0VE_A
protocol. 0C: 140, 280, 480, 580 °C for 0C1, 002, 003, and 0C4, fractions, respectively, until a well defined peak has evolved at each step, with a time limit of 80 sec and max of 580 sec, in
100% He atmosphere EC: 580, 740, 840 °C for EC1, EC2, and EC3 fractions, respectively, until a well defined peak has evolved at each step, with a time limit of min 80 sec and max of 580 sec, in
2% O2 and 98% He atmosphere. 0PR: Pyrolysis correction for pyrolyzed organic carbon (OP) by reflectance. OPT: Pyrolysis correction by transmittance. TPV: Temperature Programmed
Volatilization. ""For CIF Filters: Heated from 50 °C to 300 °C at a ramp rate of 10 °C/min in N2. For Quartz filters: Heated from 50 °C to 800 °C at a ramp rate of 28 °C/min in 70% N2 and
30% O2; EC estimated from high temperature peak (> 450 °C) on thermogram obtained from quartz-fiber filter analysis; No pyrolysis correction. STN_T0T: Speciation Trends Network Thermal
Optical Transmittance Protocol.129 0C: 310, 480, 015, 920 °C for 00, 00, 00, 90 sec respectively, in 100% He atmosphere. EC: 000, 075, 750, 825, 920 °C for 45, 45, 45, 45,120 sec
respectively, in 98% He and 2% O2 atmosphere. ACE Asia TOT: Aerosol Characterization Experiments in Asia Thermal Optical Transmittance Protocol.138 0C: 340, 500, 015, 870 °C for 00, 00, 00,
90 sec respectively, in 100% He atmosphere. EC: 550, 025, 700, 775, 850,900 °C for45, 45, 45, 45, 45,120 sec respectively, in 98% He, 2% O2. Pyrolysis correction by transmittance.
dCustom TOT: XA0-4 impregnated quartz, analyzed in He-only atmosphere with a maximum temperature 176 °C; EC is not measured.
eCustom TOR to suit Al substrate; details not reported.
f37-mm filter
Source: 'Chow (1995,077012); 2Watson and Chow (2001,157123);3 Watson et al. (1983, 045084); "Fehsenfeld et al. (2004,150432); 'Solomon et al. (2001,150993); 8Mikel (2001,150702);
'Mikel (2001,150702); "Watson et al. (1999,020949); 'Solomon and Sioutas (2000,150995); '"Graney et al. (2004, 053750); "Tanaka et al. (1998,157041); "Pancras et al. (2005,098120);
"John et al. (1988,045903); "Hering and Cass (1999, 084958); "Fritz et al. (1989, 077387); '"Hering et al. (1988, 030012); "Solomon et al. (2003,150994); '"Cabada et al. (2004,148859);
"Fine et al. (2003,155775); 20Hogrefe et al. (2004, 099003); 2,0rewnick et al. (2003, 099100); 22Watson et al. (2005,157125); 23Ho et al. (2000,150552); 240ecesari et al. (2005,144530);2S
Mayol-Bracero et al. (2002, 045010); 2sYang et al. 2003;21 Tursic et al. (2000,157003); 2"Mader et al.(2004,150724); 29Xiao and Liu (2004, 050801); 30Kiss et al. (2002,150040); ''Cornell and
Jickells (1999,150307);32 Zheng et al. (2002, 020100); 33Fraser et al. (2002,140741);34 Fraser et al. (2003, 042231) 3sSchauer er al. (1990, 051102); 3sFine et al. (2004); 3,Yue et al. (2004);
3BRinehart et al. (2000,115184); 39Wan and Yu (2000,157104); 40Poore (2000, 012839); "Fraser et al. (2003a); 42Engling et al. (2000,150422); 43Yu et al. (2005); 44Tran et al. (2000); 4sYao et al.
(2004,102213); 4sLi and Yu (2005,150092); "Henning et al. (2003,150539); 4"Zhang and Anastasio (2003,157182); "Enmenegger et al. (2007,150418); s0(Watson et al., 1989,157119);
"Greaves et al. (1985,150494); "Waterman et al. (2000,157110); s3Waterman et al. (2001,157117); s4Falkovich and Rudich (2001,150427); ssChow et al. (2007,150354); "Miguel et al.
(2004,123200); "Crinmins and Baker (2000, 097008); s"Ho and Yu (2004,150551); s9Jeon et al. (2001,010030); 60Mazzoleni et al. (2007, 098038); 6,Poore (2000, 012839); ^Butler et al.
(2003); s3Chow et al. (2000c); "Russell et al. (2004, 082453); ssGrover et al. (2000); "Graver et al. (2005, 090044); "Schwab et al. (2000b); ""Hauck et al. (2004); s9Jaques et al. (2004,
155878); '"Rupprecht and Patashrick (2003,157207); "Pang et al (2002, 030353); ,2Eatough et al. (2001,010303); ,3Lee et al. (2005b); ,4Lee et al. (2005,150080); ,sBabich et al. (2000,
150239); ,sLee et al. (2005c); "Lee et al. (2005b); '"Anderson and Ogren (1998,150213); ,9Chung et al. (2001,150357); ""Kidwell and Ondov (2004,155898); "'Lithgow et al. (2004,120010);
'"Weber et al. (2003,157129); "'Harrison et al. (2004); "Rattigan et al. (2000,115897); "sWittig et al. (2004,103413); ""Vaughn et al. (2005,157089); "'Chow et al. (2005b); ""Weber et al
(2001, 024040); ""Schwab et al. (2000a); ""Lim et al. (2003,150097); "'Watson and Chow (2002,037873); ""Venkatachari et al. (2000,105918); "3Bae et al. (2004a); "Arhami et al. (2000,
150224);95Park et al. (2005,150843); ""Bae et al. (2004b); "'Chow et al. (2000a); ""Arnott et al. (2005); "Bond et al. (1999); '""Virkkula et al. (2005,157097); '"'Petzold et al. (2002,150803);
""Park et al. (2000); ""Arnott et al. (1999, 020050); ""Peters et al. (2001); ,osPitchford et al. (1997,150872); '""Rees et al. (2004, 097104); ""Watson et al. (2000); '""Lee et al. (2005,150080);
'""Hering et al. (2004,155837); ""Watson et al. (1998); "'Chakrabarti et al. (2004); "2Mathai et al. (1990,150741); '"Kidwell and Ondov (2001,017092); '"Stanier et al. (2004); '"Khlystov et
al. (2005,150035); ""Takahama et al. (2004,157038); "'Chow et al. (2005,150348); ""Zhang et al. (2002); ""Subramanian et al. (2004, 081203); ,2°Chow et al. (2000b); "'Birch and Cary
(1990);122Birch (1998,024953); ,23Birch and Cary (1990); ""NIOSH (1990,150810); ,2sNI0SH (1999,150811); ,2"Chow et al. (1993); "'Chow et al. (2007); ""Ellis and Novakov (1982,150410);
""Peterson and Richards (2002,150801); ""Schauer et al. (2003); "'Middlebrook et al. (2003,042932); ,32Wenzel et al. (2003,157139); "'Jimenez et al. (2003); "4Phares et al. (2003,150800);
"sQin and Prather (2000,150895); ""Zhang et al. (2005); "'Bein et al. (2005,150205); ""Orewnick et al. (2004a); ""Orewnick et al. (2004b); ""Lake et al. (2003,150009); "'Lake et al. (2004,
088411)
July 2009
A-43
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table A-16. Summary of particle mass spectrometer measurement comparisons.
Spectrometer
Inlet Characteristics3 (Flow
Rate [L/Min] Size Inlet Dryer
Aerodynamic Diameter, /jm
Particle Sizing Method)
Volatilization/
Ionization
Method3
Hit Rates'1 Mass Spectrometer'
Particle Analysis/
Classification
Other
PALMS nfa
PM2.6 cyclone
Nation (17 days) I None (4 days)
0.35-2.5
Light scattering
LDI,
ArF 193 nm
2x109 to 5x109
W/cm2
14 to 100%,
overall 87%
Single T0F reflectron; Ion
polarity needs to be pre-
selected
Peak ID/regression tree
analysis
AT0FMS
1
None
None
02-2.5
Aerosol T0F
LDI, Nd: YAG 266
nm laser
~ 1x108 W|cm2
25-30%, Dual T0F reflectron;
occasionally as Detects both positive and
low as 5% negative ions
Aerosol T0F
RSMS-II nfa
None
Nation
0.015-1.3
Aerodynamic focusing Need to pre-
select sizes to be analyzed
LDI, Arf laser, 193
nm
1x108 to 2x108
W/cm2
nfa
Single linear T0F; Ion
polarity needs to be pre-
selected
Peak ID/artificial neural
network
Pure sulfuric acid
(H2S04),
(NH4>2S04, and
water (H2O)
have relatively
' high ionization
thresholds (i.e.
difficult to
ionize). Fraction
of molecules
ionized in the
particles is on
the order of 10'6
to 10e.
AMS
nfa
PM2.6 cyclone
None
0.05-2.5
Aerosol TOF
T ~ 550 °C/ El
nfa
~uadrupole;
Mass weighted size
distributions on pre-
selected positive ions
only.
ID using standard
El ionization databases
Does not detect/
analyze highly
refractory
materials such
as metals, sea
salt, soot etc.
Fraction of
molecules ionized
in the particles is
on the order of
106 to 10"7
Middlebrook et al.131; Wenzel et al.I32; Jimenez et al.133
Particle sizing is approximate in PALMS, while ATOFMS, RSMS-II and AMS provide relatively accurate particle sizing.
Particle transmission in AMS is ~ 100% (i.e., it uses all particles in the sampled air) between 60 and 600 nm, while that for PALMS, ATOFMS and RSMS-II range from 10'e
for submicron particles to 2% for supermicron (> 0.8 //m) particles.
AMS has fewer matrix effects (due to separate volatilization and ionization steps) compared to single-step LDI instruments.
While four major particle classifications (organic/ SO42', sodium/potassium sulfate, soot/hydrocarbon and mineral) were observed by all three laser instruments, they differed
in the classification frequencies. Differences in frequencies that are detected and grouped are related to the differences in the laser ionization conditions (e.g., wavelength),
particle transmission, sizing method and the way the spectra were classified.
Shorter ionization wavelengths are able to produce ions more easily than longer ones.
Low hit rates in ATOFMS corresponded to periods of high SO42' concentrations. Low hit rates in PALMS were related to a variety of factors including high SO42'
concentrations, differing laser fluence and laser position relative to particle beam. Use of a dryer in PALMS enhanced ionization of particles that were difficult to ionize at
high ambient RH.
The RSMS-II and ATOFMS were less sensitive to S042'and hence may have fewer organic/S042'particles (i.e., underestimate SO42', pure sulfuric acid etc.).
The PALMS, ATOFMS and RSMS (laser based instruments) are qualitative, while the AMS can be quantitative. The relative ratio of ion intensities from the laser
instruments, however, may be indicative of relative concentrations, thus giving semi-quantitative information.
Comparison of the ratio of NO3 to SO4 peaks with the results from the semi continuous instruments showed better correlation with the AMS (R2 - 0.93) than PALMS
(R2 - 0.65 for non-dry particles to 0.70 for dry particles). While reasonable correlations between the PALMS and the composite semi-continuous data indicate the
possibility for calibration of laser-based data for certain ions, the calibration factors may vary depending on the particle matrix, water content and laser ionization
parameters, and averaging the spectra according to these factors may minimize these effects.
Comparison of AMS SO4 with PILS SOi showed good correlation (R2 - 0.79), and the data uniformly scattered around a 1:1 line. NO3 comparison was poor (R2 - 0.49)
because of the low signal to noise ratio at low concentrations
The continuum between particle classifications indicates that the particles were not adequately represented by non-overlapping classifications.
July 2009
A-44
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Spectrometer
Inlet Characteristics3 (Flow
Rate [L/Min] Size Inlet Dryer
Aerodynamic Diameter, /jm
Particle Sizing Method)
Volatilization/
Ionization
Method3
Hit Rates'1 Mass Spectrometer'
Particle Analysis/
Classification
Other
HOUSTON SUPERSITE, TX; 08/23/00 to 09/18/00
Houston Regional Monitoring Site was located < 1.0 km north of the Houston ship channel, where chemical and other industries are present. The site was located between
a railway to the south and a chemical plant to the north. Major freeways were located just to the north and east of the sampling site.
SPECTROMETER INLET CHARACTERISTICS
(FLOW RATE [L/MIN]
SIZE INLET
DRYER AERODYNAMIC
DIAMETER,/jM PARTICLE SIZING
METHOD)
VOLATILIZATION!
IONIZATION
METHOD"
HIT RATES'
MASS
SPECTROMETER'
PARTICLE ANALYSIS! OTHER
CLASSIFICATION
RSMS-II n!a
None
Nafion
0.035 - 1.14
Aerodynamic focusing; Need to pre-
select sizes to be analyzed
LDI, ArF laser,
193 nm
nfa
Single linear TOF; Ion
polarity needs to be pre-
selected
Peak ID/artificial neural
network
At each size
point, aerosol
was sampled in
each cycle for
either 10 min or
until mass
spectra for 30
particles per
major class were
collected,
whichever came
first.
Phares et al.134
27,000 spectra were classified using a neural network into 15 particle types
Fifteen particle type mass spectra were presented along with their size distribution, avg time of day occurrence, and wind direction dependence
Major classes were a K dominant, Si/Silicon Oxide, Carbon, Sea Salt, Fe, Zn, Amines, Lime, Vanadium, Organic Mineral, Pb and K, Al, and a Pb salt particle type.
FRESNO SUPERSITE, CA: 11/30/00 to 2/4/01
Urban location in a residential neighborhood.
SPECTROMETER INLET CHARACTERISTICS VOLATILIZATION! HIT RATES" MASS PARTICLE ANALYSIS! OTHER
(FLOW RATE [L/MIN] IONIZATION SPECTROMETER' CLASSIFICATION
SIZE INLET METHOD"
DRYER AERODYNAMIC
DIAMETER,/jM PARTICLE SIZING
METHOD)
ATOFMS
1
None
None
0.3-2.5
Aerodynamic
LDI, ND: YAG
266 nm
n!a
Dual reflectron TOF
Peak ID/artificial
neural network
ATOFMS
unsealed
detected
particles tracked
B attenuation
monitor PM2.6
mass
concentration
Qin and Prather135
Biomass burning particles reached a maximum at night and a minimum during the day. These particles were less than 1 //m in diameter and accounted for more than 60% of
the particles detected at night.
Another particle class characterized by high mass carbon fragments had a similar diurnal pattern. These particles were larger than 1 //m and were interpreted as biomass
particles that have undergone gas to particle conversion of semi-volatile species followed by dissolution in a water droplet.
PITTSBURGH SUPERSITE, PA; 09/07/02 TO 09/22/02 FOR AMS; 09/20/01 to 09/26/02 for RSMS-III
6 km east of downtown in a park on the top of a hill
July 2009
A-45
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Spectrometer
Inlet Characteristics3 (Flow
Rate [L/Min] Size Inlet Dryer
Aerodynamic Diameter, /jm
Particle Sizing Method)
Volatilization/
Ionization
Method3
Hit Rates'1 Mass Spectrometer'
Particle Analysis/
Classification
Other
SPECTROMETER INLET CHARACTERISTICS
(FLOW RATE [L/MIN]
SIZE INLET
DRYER AERODYNAMIC DIAMETER,/jM
PARTICLE SIZING METHOD)
VOLATILIZATION!
IONIZATION
METHOD"
MASS
SPECTROMETER"
OTHER
AMS 1.4 eels T - 600 °C/ El
PM2.6 cyclone
None
0.05-1.0
Aerosol TOF
Quadrupole; Particle size-cut of — 1 fjm
Mass weighted size distributions on pre-
selected positive ions only.
RSMS-IM n/a
None
Nation
0.03-1.1
Aerodynamic focusing; Need to pre select
sizes to be analyzed.
LDI, ArF laser, 193 Dual TOF feflectron; Detects both positive
nm and negative ions
At each size point, aerosol was
sampled in each cycle for either 10
min or until mass spectra for 30
particles per major class were
collected, whichever came first
136 137
Zhang etal. ; Bein et al.
The AMS observed 75% of the SO42' measured by R&P-8400S (R2 - 0.69).
Collection efficiency (CE) of 0.5 used for SO42', NO3 and NH4+ and 0.7 for organics to correct mass concentrations for incomplete detection. Use of a constant CE
irrespective of size and shape may overestimate accumulation mode (mostly, oxygenated) organics (true CE ~ 0.5) and underestimate smaller mode (primary) organics (true
CE ~ 1.0).
Comparison of AMS organics (organic matter, OM) with OC measured by a continuous Sunset OCEC instrument showed good correlation (R2 - 0.88) with a slope of 1.69.
A 24-h avg comparison, showed a slope of 1.45. These values are in the typical range of 1.2 to 2.0 for OMfOC ratios.
AMS could be used along with the SMPS to estimate particle density. The AMS did not always agree with SMPS, probably due to non-spherical particles (irregular) such as
soot from fresh traffic emissions, whose mass may be overestimated by the SMPS.
Comparison of AMS mass with the MOUDI, showed differences for aerodynamic diameters > 600 nm, probably due to the AMS transmission being less than unity for
particles larger than 600 nm.
For RSMS-III, 54% of the detected particles were assigned to one class (carbonaceous ammonium nitrate). This class was preferentially detected during the colder months
and was detected from many different wind directions.
The next largest RSMS-III class was EC/OC/K class at 11%, and is believed to be from biomass burning.
An unidentified organic carbon RSMS-III class (3.3% of all detected particles) was seen to be highly dependent on wind direction dependence and was primarily detected
during August and September of 2002. These particles likely originated from a landfill.
NEW YORK SUPERSITE; 06/30/01 to 08/05/01 (urban); 07/09/02 to 08/07/02: (rural)
Urban Site: Queens College, Queens, New York, located at the edge of a parking lot and within 1 km from expressways and highways in New York City Metropolitan area.
Rural Site: Whiteface Mountain, New York, located in a cleared area surrounded by mix of deciduous and evergreen trees, ~ 2 km away from the closest highway with no
major cities within 20 km.
SPECTROMETER
INLET CHARACTERISTICS
(FLOW RATE [L/MIN]
SIZE INLET
DRYER AERODYNAMIC
DIAMETER,/jM PARTICLE
SIZING METHOD)
VOLATILIZATION!
IONIZATION
METHOD"
MASS
SPECTROMETER'
OTHER
AMS
0.1
PM2.6 cyclone
None
0.02-2.5
Aerosol TOF
T - 700 °C| El
Quadrupole;
Mass weighted size
distributions on pre selected
positive ions only.
Data are 10-min averages
July 2009
A-46
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Inlet Characteristics3 (Flow
Rate [L/Min] Size Inlet Dryer v®latlllzatlon' Particle Analysis/
Spectrometer . . Ionization Hit Rates Mass Spectrometer „. ... .. Other
Aerodynamic Diameter, um Classification
n J- I n- ¦ n fl -i j\ Method3
Particle Sizing Method)
Drewnick et al.138'139; Hogrefe et al.20
Transport losses were 1.3% on avg.
Inlet losses (at the inlet of AMS) were 1.9%, on avg, ranging from 11 % for a 20 nm particle to 9% for a 2.5 fjm particle, with a minimum of 0.7% for a 350 nm particle
Overall measurement uncertainty of particle diameter was —11%.
The AMS was reliable with proper calibration, care, and maintenance. Valid 10 min averages were obtained for all components more than 93% of the time.
The mass to charge ratios (m/z) of fragments from different components may overlap (e.g., NH+, a fragment of NH4+ and CH3+, a fragment of organic species, have
mfz - 15) resulting in an interference (called as isobaric interference) Interfering signals were not used to calculate concentrations. This loss in concentration was adjusted
by applying a correction factor determined from laboratory studies.
Typical interferences were from fragments of organic species, water and oxygen.
With adjustments, the SO42', NO:; , and ammonium concentrations measured by the AMS were consistently lower than that measured by other co-located instruments,
probably due to incomplete focusing of the (NH4)2S04 and NH4NO3 particles by the aerodynamic lens.
At the urban site, AMS NO3 was within 10% of the filter NO3 concentration. At the rural site, it had a slope of 0.51 and R2 of 0.46.
AMS SO4showed good agreement with R&P-8400S at both the rural and urban locations (R2 - 0.89 to 0.92, slope - 0.99, n - 407 to 695) and was within 70 to 85% of
filter SO42' concentration.
Comparison of the total non-refractory mass measured by the AMS with the PM2.6 TE0M mass (operated at 50 °C or with dryer) at the urban location, showed good
correlation (R2 - 0.91) with near zero intercept (0.22 /yglm3). On avg, the AMS observed 64% of the mass measured by the TE0M.
The unexplained mass (36%) was attributed to transport losses, transmission and optical losses, and refractory components in the aerosol sample (e.g., metals, EC). The
mass closure was within the estimated uncertainty of the AMS mass measurements (5 to 10%).
BALTIMORE SUPERSITE, MD; 04/01/02 to 11/30/02
East of downtown in an urban residential area. Within 91 m of a bus maintenance facility.
SPECTROMETER INLET CHARACTERISTICS VOLATILIZATION/ MASS OTHER
(FLOW RATE [L/MII\I] IONIZATION SPECTROMETER"
SIZE INLET METHOD"
DRYER AERODYNAMIC
DIAMETER,/jM PARTICLE
SIZING METHOD)
RSMS-III 0.2 - 18, based on particle size
chosen
None
Nafion
0.045- 1.3
Aerodynamic focusing; Need to
pre select sizes to be analyzed
Lakeet al.140"1
Utilizing both positive and negative ion detection enables detection of more species. However, detection efficiencies of negative ions decreased for smaller particles.
S04+ concentration (number or mass) was not accurately quantified.
RSMS-III was most efficient in 0.050 to 0.77 fjm range.
Particle compositions could be related to specific source categaories.
LDI, ArF laser, 193 nm TOF with dual ion polarity At each size set point,
aerosol was sampled in
each cycle for either 10
min or until mass spectra
from 30 particles were
collected, whichever
came first.
July 2009
A-47
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table A-17. Summary of particle mass spectrometer measurement comparisons.
Inlet Characteristics3 (Flow
Rate [L/Min] Size Inlet Volatilization/
Spectrometer Dryer Aerodynamic Ionization
Diameter, /jm Particle Method3
Sizing Method)
Hit Rates'1
Mass
Spectrometer'
Particle
Analysis/
Classification
Other
PALMS
n/a
PM2.6 cyclone
Nation (17 days) I
0.35-2.5
Light scattering
None (4 days)
LDI,
ArF 193 nm
2x109 to 5x109
W/cm2
14 to 100%,
overall 87%
Single T0F reflectron;
Ion polarity needs to be
preselected
Peak ID/regression
tree analysis
AT0FMS
1
None
None
02-2.5
Aerosol T0F
LDI, Nd: YAG 266
nm laser
~ 1x108 W|cm2
25-30%, Dual T0F reflectron;
occasionally as Detects both positive
low as 5% and negative ions
Aerosol T0F
Pure sulfuric acid (H2SO4),
(NH4>2S04, and water (H2O)
have relatively
high ionization thresholds (i.e.
difficult to ionize). Fraction of
molecules ionized in the
particles is on the order of 10 !l
to 100.
RSMS-II n/a
None
Nafion
0.015-1.3
Aerodynamic focusing Need to
pre select sizes to be analyzed
LDI, Arf laser, 193 n/a
nm
1x108 to 2x108
W/cm2
Single linear T0F; Ion
polarity needs to be pre-
selected
Peak ID/artificial
neural network
AMS
n/a
PM2.6 cyclone
None
0.05-2.5
Aerosol TOF
T — 550 °C/EI
n/a
~uadrupole;
ID using standard Does not detect! analyze highly
Mass weighted size El ionization
distributions on pre- databases
selected positive ions
only.
refractory materials such as
metals, sea salt, soot etc.
Fraction of molecules ionized in
the particles is on the order of
106 to 10"7
Middlebrook et al.131; Wenzel et al.I32; Jimenez et al.133
Particle sizing is approximate in PALMS, while ATOFMS, RSMS-II and AMS provide relatively accurate particle sizing.
Particle transmission in AMS is ~ 100% (i.e., it uses all particles in the sampled air) between 60 and 600 nm, while that for PALMS, ATOFMS and RSMS-II range from 10'e
for submicron particles to 2% for supermicron (> 0.8 //m) particles.
AMS has fewer matrix effects (due to separate volatilization and ionization steps) compared to single-step LDI instruments.
While four major particle classifications (organic/ SO42', sodium/potassium sulfate, soot/hydrocarbon and mineral) were observed by all three laser instruments, they differed
in the classification frequencies. Differences in frequencies that are detected and grouped are related to the differences in the laser ionization conditions (e.g., wavelength),
particle transmission, sizing method and the way the spectra were classified.
Shorter ionization wavelengths are able to produce ions more easily than longer ones.
Low hit rates in ATOFMS corresponded to periods of high SO42' concentrations. Low hit rates in PALMS were related to a variety of factors including high SO42'
concentrations, differing laser fluence and laser position relative to particle beam. Use of a dryer in PALMS enhanced ionization of particles that were difficult to ionize at
high ambient RH.
The RSMS-II and ATOFMS were less sensitive to S042'and hence may have fewer organic/S042'particles (i.e., underestimate SO42', pure sulfuric acid etc.).
The PALMS, ATOFMS and RSMS (laser based instruments) are qualitative, while the AMS can be quantitative. The relative ratio of ion intensities from the laser
instruments, however, may be indicative of relative concentrations, thus giving semi-quantitative information.
Comparison of the ratio of NO3 to SO4 peaks with the results from the semi continuous instruments showed better correlation with the AMS (R2 - 0.93) than PALMS
(R2 - 0.65 for non-dry particles to 0.70 for dry particles). While reasonable correlations between the PALMS and the composite semi-continuous data indicate the
possibility for calibration of laser-based data for certain ions, the calibration factors may vary depending on the particle matrix, water content and laser ionization
parameters, and averaging the spectra according to these factors may minimize these effects.
Comparison of AMS SO4 with PILS SOi showed good correlation (R2 - 0.79), and the data uniformly scattered around a 1: 1 line. NO3 comparison was poor (R2 - 0.49)
because of the low signal to noise ratio at low concentrations
The continuum between particle classifications indicates that the particles were not adequately represented by non-overlapping classifications.
HOUSTON SUPERSITE, TX; 08/23/00 to 09/18/00
Houston Regional Monitoring Site was located < 1.0 km north of the Houston ship channel, where chemical and other industries are present. The site was located between
a railway to the south and a chemical plant to the north. Major freeways were located just to the north and east of the sampling site.
July 2009
A-48
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Spectrometer
Inlet Characteristics3 (Flow
Rate [L/Min] Size Inlet
Dryer Aerodynamic
Diameter, /jm Particle
Sizing Method)
Volatilization/
Ionization
Method3
Hit Rates'1
Mass
Spectrometer'
Particle
Analysis/
Classification
Other
SPECTROMETER
INLET CHARACTERISTICS
(FLOW RATE [L/MIN]
SIZE INLET
DRYER AERODYNAMIC
DIAMETER,/jM PARTICLE
SIZING METHOD)
VOLATILIZATION!
IONIZATION
METHOD"
HIT RATES'
MASS
SPECTROMETER'
PARTICLE
ANALYSIS!
CLASSIFICATION
OTHER
RSMS-II
n/a
None
Nafion
0.035 - 1.14
Aerodynamic focusing; Need to
pre select sizes to be analyzed
LDI, ArF laser,
193 nm
nfa
Single linear TOF; Ion
polarity needs to be pre-
selected
Peak ID/artificial
neural network
At each size point, aerosol was
sampled in each cycle for either
10 min or until mass spectra
for 30 particles per major class
were collected, whichever
came first.
Phares et al.134
27,000 spectra were classified using a neural network into 15 particle types
Fifteen particle type mass spectra were presented along with their size distribution, avg time of day occurrence, and wind direction dependence
Major classes were a K dominant, Si/Silicon Oxide, Carbon, Sea Salt, Fe, Zn, Amines, Lime, Vanadium, Organic Mineral, Pb and K, Al, and a Pb salt particle type.
FRESNO SUPERSITE, CA: 11/30/00 to 2/4/01
Urban location in a residential neighborhood.
SPECTROMETER INLET CHARACTERISTICS VOLATILIZATION! HIT RATES" MASS PARTICLE OTHER
(FLOW RATE [L/MIN] IONIZATION SPECTROMETER' ANALYSIS!
SIZEINLET METHOD" CLASSIFICATION
DRYER AERODYNAMIC
DIAMETER,/jM PARTICLE
SIZING METHOD)
ATOFMS
1
None
None
0.3-2.5
Aerodynamic
LDI, ND: YAG
266 nm
n)a
Dual reflectron TOF
Peak ID/artificial
neural network
ATOFMS unsealed detected
particles tracked B attenuation
monitor PM2.6 mass
concentration
Qin and Prather135
Biomass burning particles reached a maximum at night and a minimum during the day. These particles were less than 1 //m in diameter and accounted for more than 60% of
the particles detected at night.
Another particle class characterized by high mass carbon fragments had a similar diurnal pattern. These particles were larger than 1 //m and were interpreted as biomass
particles that have undergone gas to particle conversion of semi-volatile species followed by dissolution in a water droplet.
PITTSBURGH SUPERSITE, PA; 09/07/02 TO 09/22/02 FOR AMS; 09/20/01 to 09/26/02 for RSMS-III
6 km east of downtown in a park on the top of a hill
SPECTROMETER INLET CHARACTERISTICS VOLATILIZATION! MASS SPECTROMETER" OTHER
(FLOW RATE [L(MIN] IONIZATION
SIZE INLET METHOD"
DRYER AERODYNAMIC DIAMETER,/jM
PARTICLE SIZING METHOD)
AMS 1.4 eels T ¦ 600 °C/ El
PM2.6 cyclone
None
0.05-1.0
Aerosol TOF
Quadrupole; Particle size-cut of — 1 fjm
Mass weighted size distributions on
pre selected positive ions only.
July 2009
A-49
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Inlet Characteristics3 (Flow
Rate [L/Min] Size Inlet Volatilization/
Spectrometer Dryer Aerodynamic Ionization
Diameter, /jm Particle Method3
Sizing Method)
Hit Rates'1
Mass
Spectrometer'
Particle
Analysis/
Classification
Other
RSMS-III n/a
None
Nation
0.03-1.1
Aerodynamic focusing; Need to pre-
select sizes to be analyzed.
LDI.ArF laser, 193
nm
Dual TOF feflectron; Detects both
positive and negative ions
At each size point, aerosol was sampled in
each cycle for either 10 min or until mass
spectra for 30 particles per major class were
collected, whichever came first
136 137
Zhang etal. ; Bein et al.
TheAMS observed 75% of the SO42' measured by R&P-8400S (R2 - 0.69).
Collection efficiency (CE) of 0.5 used for SO42', NO3 and NH4+ and 0.7 for organics to correct mass concentrations for incomplete detection. Use of a constant CE
irrespective of size and shape may overestimate accumulation mode (mostly, oxygenated) organics (true CE ~ 0.5) and underestimate smaller mode (primary) organics (true
CE ~ 1.0).
Comparison of AMS organics (organic matter, 0M) with 0C measured by a continuous Sunset 0CEC instrument showed good correlation (R2 - 0.88) with a slope of 1.69.
A 24-h avg comparison, showed a slope of 1.45. These values are in the typical range of 1.2 to 2.0 for 0IW0C ratios.
AMS could be used along with the SMPS to estimate particle density. The AMS did not always agree with SMPS, probably due to non-spherical particles (irregular) such as
soot from fresh traffic emissions, whose mass may be overestimated by the SMPS.
Comparison of AMS mass with the M0UDI, showed differences for aerodynamic diameters > 600 nm, probably due to the AMS transmission being less than unity for
particles larger than 600 nm.
For RSMS-III, 54% of the detected particles were assigned to one class (carbonaceous ammonium nitrate). This class was preferentially detected during the colder months
and was detected from many different wind directions.
The next largest RSMS-III class was EC/0C/K class at 11%, and is believed to be from biomass burning.
An unidentified organic carbon RSMS-III class (3.3% of all detected particles) was seen to be highly dependent on wind direction dependence and was primarily detected
during August and September of 2002. These particles likely originated from a landfill.
NEW YORK SUPERSITE; 06/30/01 to 08/05/01 (urban); 07/09/02 to 08/07/02: (rural)
Urban Site: Queens College, Queens, New York, located at the edge of a parking lot and within 1 km from expressways and highways in New York City Metropolitan area.
Rural Site: Whiteface Mountain, New York, located in a cleared area surrounded by mix of deciduous and evergreen trees, ~ 2 km away from the closest highway with no
major cities within 20 km.
SPECTROMETER INLET CHARACTERISTICS VOLATILIZATION! MASS OTHER
(FLOW RATE [L/MIN] l0NIZATI0N SPECTROMETER"
SIZE INLET METHOD"
DRYER AERODYNAMIC
DIAMETER,/jM PARTICLE
SIZING METHOD)
AMS
0.1
PM2.6 cyclone
None
0.02-2.5
Aerosol TOF
T - 700 °C/ El
Quadrupole;
Mass weighted size
distributions on pre-
selected positive ions
only.
Data are 10-min averages
July 2009
A-50
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Inlet Characteristics3 (Flow
Rate [L/Min] Size Inlet
Spectrometer Dryer Aerodynamic
Diameter, /jm Particle
Sizing Method)
Drewnick et al.138'139; Hogrefe et al.20
Transport losses were 1.3% on avg.
Inlet losses (at the inlet of AMS) were 1.9%, on avg, ranging from 11 % for a 20 nm particle to 9% for a 2.5 fjm particle, with a minimum of 0.7% for a 350 nm particle
Overall measurement uncertainty of particle diameter was —11%.
The AMS was reliable with proper calibration, care, and maintenance. Valid 10 min averages were obtained for all components more than 93% of the time.
The mass to charge ratios (m/z) of fragments from different components may overlap (e.g., NH+, a fragment of NH4+ and CH3+, a fragment of organic species, have
mfz - 15) resulting in an interference (called as isobaric interference) Interfering signals were not used to calculate concentrations. This loss in concentration was adjusted
by applying a correction factor determined from laboratory studies.
Typical interferences were from fragments of organic species, water and oxygen.
With adjustments, the SO42', NO:; , and ammonium concentrations measured by the AMS were consistently lower than that measured by other co-located instruments,
probably due to incomplete focusing of the (NH4)2S04 and NH4NO3 particles by the aerodynamic lens.
At the urban site, AMS NO3 was within 10% of the filter NO3 concentration. At the rural site, it had a slope of 0.51 and R2 of 0.46.
AMS SO4showed good agreement with R&P-8400S at both the rural and urban locations (R2 - 0.89 to 0.92, slope - 0.99, n - 407 to 695) and was within 70 to 85% of
filter SO42' concentration.
Comparison of the total non-refractory mass measured by the AMS with the PM2.6 TE0M mass (operated at 50 °C or with dryer) at the urban location, showed good
correlation (R2 - 0.91) with near zero intercept (0.22 /yglm3). On avg, the AMS observed 64% of the mass measured by the TE0M.
The unexplained mass (36%) was attributed to transport losses, transmission and optical losses, and refractory components in the aerosol sample (e.g., metals, EC). The
mass closure was within the estimated uncertainty of the AMS mass measurements (5 to 10%).
BALTIMORE SUPERSITE, MD; 04/01/02 to 11/30/02
East of downtown in an urban residential area. Within 91 m of a bus maintenance facility.
SPECTROMETER INLET CHARACTERISTICS VOLATILIZATION! MASS OTHER
(FLOW RATE [L/MIN] l0NIZATI0N SPECTROMETER"
SIZE INLET METHOD"
DRYER AERODYNAMIC
DIAMETER, fjM PARTICLE
SIZING METHOD)
RSMS-III 0.2 - 18, based on particle
size chosen
None
Nafion
0.045- 1.3
Aerodynamic focusing; Need
to pre select sizes to be
analyzed
Lakeet al.140"1
Utilizing both positive and negative ion detection enables detection of more species. However, detection efficiencies of negative ions decreased for smaller particles.
S04+ concentration (number or mass) was not accurately quantified.
RSMS-III was most efficient in 0.050 to 0.77 fjm range.
Particle compositions could be related to specific source categaories.
Volatilization/ .. Particle
Mass
Ionization Hit Rates'1 „ r Analysis/ Other
Method3 Spectrometer c|assjfication
LDI, ArF laser, 193 nm TOF with dual ion polarity At each size set point, aerosol was
sampled in each cycle for either 10 min
or until mass spectra from 30 particles
were collected, whichever came first.
July 2009
A-51
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Inlet Characteristics3 (Flow
Rate [L/Min] Size Inlet Volatilization/ „„ Particle
Macs
Spectrometer Dryer Aerodynamic Ionization Hit Rates'1 Analysis/ Other
Diameter, //m Particle Method3 Classification
Sizing Method)
aEI: Electon Impact; LDI: Laser Desorption / Ionization
bHit rate refers to the number of particles with a mass spectrum as a fraction of the number of particles detected. It does not apply to RSMS and AMS because there is no separate detection
eT0F: Time fo Flight
ATLANTA SUPERSITE, GA; 08/03/99 to 09/01/99
4 km NW of downtown, within 200 m of a bus maintenance yard and several warehouse facilities, representative of a mixed commercial-residential neighborhood.
Source: 'Chow (1995,077012); 2Watson and Chow (2001,157123);3 Watson et al. (1983, 045084); "Fehsenfeld et al. (2004,156432); 'Solomon et al. (2001,156993); sMikel (2001,156762);
'Mikel (2001,156762); "Watson et al. (1999,020949); 'Solomon and Sioutas (2006,156995); '"Graney et al. (2004, 053756); "Tanaka et al. (1998,157041); "Pancras et al. (2005,098120);
"John et al. (1988,045903); "Hering and Cass (1999, 084958); "Fritz et al. (1989, 077387); '"Hering et al. (1988, 036012); "Solomon et al. (2003,156994); "Cabada et al. (2004,148859);
"Fine et al. (2003,155775); 2°Hogrefe et al. (2004, 099003); 2,Drewnick et al. (2003, 099160); 22Watson et al. (2005,157125); 23Ho et al. (2006,156552); 24Decesari et al. (2005,144536);2S
Mayol-Bracero et al. (2002, 045010); 2sYang et al. 2003;21 Tursic et al. (2006,157063); 2"Mader et al.(2004,156724); 29Xiao and Liu (2004, 056801); 3°Kiss et al. (2002,156646); 3,Cornell and
Jickells (1999,156367);32 Zheng et al. (2002, 026100); 33Fraser et al. (2002,140741);34 Fraser et al. (2003, 042231) 3sSchauer er al. (1996, 051162); 3sFine et al. (2004); 3,Yue et al. (2004);
3BRinehart et al. (2006,115184); 39Wan and Yu (2006,157104); 40Poore (2000, 012839); "Fraser et al. (2003a); 42Engling et al. (2006,156422); 43Yu et al. (2005); 44Tran et al. (2000); 4sYao et al.
(2004,102213); 4sLi and Yu (2005,156692); "Henning et al. (2003,156539); 4"Zhang and Anastasio (2003,157182); "Enmenegger et al. (2007,156418); s0(Watson et al., 1989,157119);
"Greaves et al. (1985,156494); "Waterman et al. (2000,157116); s3Waterman et al. (2001,157117); s4Falkovich and Rudich (2001,156427); ssChow et al. (2007,156354); "Miguel et al.
(2004,123260); "Crinmins and Baker (2006, 097008); s"Ho and Yu (2004,156551); s9Jeon et al. (2001,016636); 60Mazzoleni et al. (2007, 098038); 6,Poore (2000, 012839); ^Butler et al.
(2003); G3Chow et al. (2006c); "Russell et al. (2004, 082453); ssGro»er et al. (2006); ssGro»er et al. (2005, 090044); "Schwab et al. (2006b); ""Hauck et al. (2004); s9Jaques et al. (2004,
155878); '"Rupprecht and Patashrick (2003,157207); "Pang et al (2002, 030353); "Eatough et al. (2001,010303); ,3Lee et al. (2005b); ,4Lee et al. (2005,156680); ,sBabich et al. (2000,
156239); ,sLee et al. (2005c); "Lee et al. (2005b); '"Anderson and Ogren (1998,156213); ,9Chung et al. (2001,156357); ""Kidwell and Ondo» (2004,155898); "Lithgow et al. (2004,126616);
""Weber et al. (2003,157129); "'Harrison et al. (2004); "Rattigan et al. (2006,115897); "sWittig et al. (2004,103413); ""Vaughn et al. (2005,157089); "'Chow et al. (2005b); ""Weber et al
(2001, 024640); "Schwab et al. (2006a); 90Lim et al. (2003,156697); 9,Watson and Chow (2002,037873); ^Venkatachari et al. (2006,105918); 93Bae et al. (2004a); "Arhami et al. (2006,
156224); 9sPark et al. (2005,156843); ""Bae et al. (2004b); 9,Chow et al. (2006a); ""Arnott et al. (2005); "Bond et al. (1999); '""Virkkula et al. (2005,157097); ""Petzold et al. (2002,156863);
,02Park et al. (2006); ,raArnott et al. (1999, 020650); ""Peters et al. (2001); ,osPitchford et al. (1997,156872); ,osRees et al. (2004, 097164); ""Watson et al. (2000); ,0BLee et al. (2005,156680);
'""Hering et al. (2004,155837); ""Watson et al. (1998); '"Chakrabarti et al. (2004); "2Mathai et al. (1990,156741); '"Kidwell and Ondo» (2001,017092); '"Stanier et al. (2004); '"Khlystov et
al. (2005,156635); ""Takahama et al. (2004,157038); '"Chow et al. (2005,156348); ""Zhang et al. (2002); ""Subramanian et al. (2004, 081203); ,2°Chow et al. (2006b); "'Birch and Cary
(1996);122Birch (1998,024953); ,23Birch and Cary (1996); ""NIOSH (1996,156810); "sNI0SH (1999,156811); ,2"Chow et al. (1993); "'Chow et al. (2007); ""Ellis and No»ako» (1982,156416);
""Peterson and Richards (2002,156861); ""Schauer et al. (2003); ,3,Middlebrook et al. (2003,042932); ,32Wenzel et al. (2003,157139);133Jimenez et al. (2003); "4Phares et al. (2003,156866);
"sQin and Prather (2006,156895); "Zhang et al. (2005); "'Bein et al. (2005,156265); ""Drewnick et al. (2004a); ""Drewnick et al. (2004b); ""Lake et al. (2003,156669); "'Lake et al. (2004,
088411)
Source: Chow et al. (2008,156355
Table A-18. Summary of key parameters for TD-GC/MS and pyrolysis-GC/MS.
Reference
Sample Type
TD Unit
Analytical Instrument
Total Analysis
Time
TD-GC/MS WITHRESISTIVELYHEATED EXTERNAL OVEN
Greaves et al. (1985, 156494;
1987,156495); Veltkamp et al.
(1996,081594)
Aerosol sample and NIST SRM 1649
A cylindrical aluminum block containing
a heating cartridge connected to a
thermocouple
HP 5892A GC/MS in El mode
ambient sample:
55.5 min NIST
standard: 45.5 min
Waterman et al. (2000,157116)
NIST SRM 1640a
External oven mounted on the top of
the GC/MS system
HP 5890 GC/Fisons
MD 800 MS, scan
range: 40-520 amu
90 min
Waterman et al. (2001,157117)
NIST SRM 1649a
Same as above
HP 5890 GC/Fisons
MD 800 MS, scan
range: m/z 40 to 520
90 mins
Sidhu et al. (2001,155202)
Aerosol collected on glass nber niters
from combustion of alternative diesel
fuel.
A stainless steel tube (0.635 cm
O.D.laced in a GC oven
Two GCs and one MS. The nrst
GC is used as the TE unit. The
second GC separates the
desorbent.
Ua
Havs et al. (2003,156529;
2004,156530); Dong et al.
(2004,156409)
Aerosol collected from residential wood
combustion, residential oil furnace and
~replace appliance
A glass tube placed in an external oven
(TDS2 Gerstel Inc.)
Aglient 6890 GC/5793 MSD,
scan range: 50 to 500 amu
99 min
July 2009
A-52
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Sample Type
TD Unit
Analytical Instrument
Total Analysis
Time
CURIE POINT TDGC/MS
Jeon et al. (2001, 016636)
High-volume PMio ambient samples
collected along the U.S.fMexico border
Curie point pyrolyzer
HP 5890 GC/5792 MSD
Ua
Neususs et al. (2000,156804)
Ambient aerosol collected during the 2nd
Aerosol Characterization Experiment
Curie point pyrolyzer
Fisons Trio 1000
35 min
IN INJECTION PORT TED GC/MS
Helmiq et al. (1990,156536)
Aerosol samples collected on glass-fiber
filters at a forest site
GC injector port, with modified septum
cap
Carlo Erba Mega 5160 GC/VG
250/70 SE MS, scan range: 45-
400 amu
47 min
Hall et al. (1999,156512)
NIST SRM 1649
Micro-scale sealed vessel placed inside
the injector port
HP 5890 GC/Fisons MD 800
MS, scan range: 40-500 amu
82.5 min
Blanchard and Hopper (1997)
(1997,157195); Blanchard et al.
(2002,189737)
Aerosol samples collected on quartz-and-
glass filters in Ontario
A GC injection port was added with
three minor components, including a
small T-connector, 3-way valve, and
needle valve
HP 5892A GC/5972A MS in El
mode
71 min
Falkovich and Rudich (2001,
156427); Falkovich et al. (2004,
156428); Graham et al. (2004,
156490)
NIST SRM 1649a; urban aerosols
collected with an 8-stage impactor in
Tel-Aviv, Israel
Direct Sample Introduction (DSI) device
(ChromatoProbe, Varian Co.)
Varian Saturn 3400 GC/MS
64.2 min
Ho and Yu (2004,156551); Yanq
et al. (2005,102388)
Ambient aerosol samples collected on
Teflon-impregnated glass-fiber filters in
Hong Kong and on quartz filters at
Nanjing, China
Conventional GC injection port. No
modification of GC injector and liner
HP 5890 GC/5791 MSD, scan
range: 50-650 amu
41.5 min
TD-GCX GC-MS
Welthagen et al. (2003,
104056); Schnelle-Kreis et al.
(2005,112944)
Ambient samples in Augsburg, Germany
Injection port Optic III with autoloader
(ATAS-GL, Veldhoven, NL)
Agilent 6890 GC/LECO Pegasus
III TOF/MS with a LECO
Pegasus 4D GCxGC modulator
175 min
Hamilton et al. (2004,156516)
PM2.E aerosol collected in London
Conventional GC injection port
The same as above, scan range:
20-350 amu
93.7 min
Hamilton et al. (2005, 088173)
Secondary organic aerosol formed during
the photo-oxidation of toluene with OH
radicals
The same as above
The same above
102.5 min
IN SITU SEMI CONTINUOUS AND CONTINUOUS TD SYSTEMS
Williams et al. (2006,156157)
In situ aerosol samples collected in
Berkley, CA
Collection-TE cell with conventional GC
injection port
Agilent 6890 GC/5793 MSD,
scan range: 29-550 amu
59 min
PYROLYSIS TD GC/MS
Voorheeset al. (1991,157101)
PM0.6 and PM>o.4b collected on quartz
fiber in pristine regions of Colorado
A tube furnace directly interfaced to an
GC/MS
Extrel Simulscan GC/MS, scan
range: 35-450 amu
31.7 min
Subbalakshmi et al. (2000,
157023)
Ambient aerosol collected on glass-fiber
filters in Jakarta, Indonesia
A pyroinjector
Agilent 6890 GC/5973 MS,
scan range: 50-550 amu
63.5 min
Fabbri et al. (2002,156426)
PM10 collected on glass-fiber filters in an
industrial are of Italy
A pyrolyzer directly connected to the
GC injector port through an interface
heated at 250° C
Varian 3400 GC/Saturn II ion
trap MS, scan range: 45-400
amu
57 min
Blazso et al. (2003,156278)
PM2.6 collected on quartz-fiber filters
and size-segregated aerosol sampled
collected on A1 foils in Brazil
A pyrolyzer
Agilent 6890 GC/5973 MS
30.3 min
Labbanet al. (2006,156665)
PM10 of re-suspended soil collected on
quartz-fiber filters
Curie point pyrolyzer
HP 5890 GC/5972 MS
25.5. min
July 2009
A-53
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference Sample Type TD Unit Analytical Instrument Total Analysis
Total analysis time could not be determined because of insufficient experimental details
Source: Chow et al. (2007,157209)
A. 1.2. Networks
Table A-19. Relevant Spatial Scales for PM10l PM2.5, and PM102.5 Measurement
Spatial
Scales
PM10
PM2.5
PMio 2.5
Microscale
(~ 5 - 100 m)
This scale would typify areas such as downtown
street canyons, traffic corridors, and fence line
stationary source monitoring locations where the
general public could be exposed to maximum
PM10 concentrations. Microscale particulate
matter sites should be located near inhabited
buildings or locations where the general public
can be expected to be exposed to the
concentration measured. Emissions from
stationary sources such as primary and
secondary smelters, power plants, and other
large industrial processes may, under certain
plume conditions, likewise result in high ground
level concentrations at the microscale. In the
latter case, the microscale would represent an
area impacted by the plume with dimensions
extending up to approximately 100 meters. Data
collected at microscale sites provide information
for evaluating and developing hot spot control
measures.
This scale would typify areas such as downtown
street canyons and traffic corridors where the
general public would be exposed to maximum
concentrations from mobile sources. In some
circumstances, the microscale is appropriate for
particulate sites; community-oriented SLAMS sites
measured at the microscale level should, however,
be limited to urban sites that are representative of
long-term human exposure and of many such
microenvironments in the area. In general,
microscale particulate matter sites should be located
near inhabited buildings or locations where the
general public can be expected to be exposed to the
concentration measured. Emissions from stationary
sources such as primary and secondary smelters,
power plants, and other large industrial processes
may, under certain plume conditions, likewise result
in high ground level concentrations at the
microscale. In the latter case, the microscale would
represent an area impacted by the plume with
dimensions extending up to approximately 100
meters. Data collected at microscale sites provide
information for evaluating and developing hot spot
control measures. Unless these sites are indicative
of population-oriented monitoring, they may be more
appropriately classified as SPM.
This scale would typify relatively small areas
immediately adjacent to: Industrial sources;
locations experiencing ongoing construction,
redevelopment, and soil disturbance; and heavily
traveled roadways. Data collected at microscale
stations would characterize exposure over areas
of limited spatial extent and population exposure,
and may provide information useful for evaluating
and developing source-oriented control measures.
Middle Scale Much of the short-term public exposure to coarse
(~100- fraction particles (PMio) is on this scale and on
500 ml "1S neighborhood scale. People moving through
downtown areas or living near major roadways or
stationary sources, may encounter particulate
pollution that would be adequately characterized
by measurements of this spatial scale. Middle
scale PMio measurements can be appropriate for
the evaluation of possible short-term exposure
public health effects. In many situations,
monitoring sites that are representative of micro-
scale or middle-scale impacts are not unique and
are representative of many similar situations.
This can occur along traffic corridors or other
locations in a residential district. In this case, one
location is representative of a neighborhood of
small scale sites and is appropriate for evaluation
of long-term or chronic effects. This scale also
includes the characteristic concentrations for
other areas with dimensions of a few hundred
meters such as the parking lot and feeder streets
associated with shopping centers, stadia, and
office buildings. In the case of PMio, unpaved or
seldomly swept parking lots associated with
these sources could be an important source in
addition to the vehicular emissions themselves.
People moving through downtown areas, or living
near major roadways, encounter particle
concentrations that would be adequately
characterized by this spatial scale. Thus,
measurements of this type would be appropriate for
the evaluation of possible short-term exposure public
health effects of particulate matter pollution. In
many situations, monitoring sites that are
representative of microscale or middle-scale impacts
are not unique and are representative of many
similar situations. This can occur along traffic
corridors or other locations in a residential district.
In this case, one location is representative of a
number of small scale sites and is appropriate for
evaluation of long-term or chronic effects. This scale
also includes the characteristic concentrations for
other areas with dimensions of a few hundred
meters such as the parking lot and feeder streets
associated with shopping centers, stadia, and office
buildings.
People living or working near major roadways or
industrial districts encounter particle
concentrations that would be adequately
characterized by this spatial scale. Thus,
measurements of this type would be appropriate
for the evaluation of public health effects of
coarse particle exposure. Monitors located in
populated areas that are nearly adjacent to large
industrial point sources of coarse particles
provide suitable locations for assessing maximum
population exposure levels and identifying areas
of potentially poor air quality. Similarly, monitors
located in populated areas that border dense
networks of heavily-traveled traffic are
appropriate for assessing the impacts of
resuspended road dust. This scale also includes
the characteristic concentrations for other areas
with dimensions of a few hundred meters such as
school grounds and parks that are nearly
adjacentto major roadways and industrial point
sources, locations exhibiting mixed residential
and commercial development, and downtown
areas featuring office buildings, shopping
centers, and stadiums.
July 2009
A-54
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Spatial
Scales
PMio
PM2.5
PM102.5
Neighborhood
Scale
( — 500 m-
4 l
-------
Network
Lead
Agency
Number of
Sites
Initiated
Measurement
Parameters
Location of Information and/or Data
SLAMS1 - State and Local
EPA
-3000
1978
O3, NOxINO?, SO2,
http:ffwww.epa.govfairfoaqpsfqafmonprog.html
Ambient Monitoring
PM2.BIPM10, CO, Pb
Stations
STN-PM2.6 Speciation
EPA
300
1999
PM2.6, PM2.6 speciation,
http:))www.epa.qov)ttnamti1 fspecqen.html
Trends Network
major Ions, metals
PAMS-Photochemical
EPA
75
1994
O3, NOx/NOy, CO, speciated
http:ffwww.epa. govfairfoaqpsfpamsf
Assessment Monitoring
VOCs, carbonyls, surface
Network
meteorology 81 Upper Air
IMPROVE—Interagencv
NPS
110 plus
1988
PM2.6/PM10, major ions,
http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/IMPROVE/
Monitoring of Protected
67 protocol
metals, light extinction,
Visual Environments
sites
scattering coefficient
CASTNet - Clean Air
EPA
80 +
1987
O3, SO2, major ions,
http:/)www.epa.qov)castnet)
Status and Trends
calculated dry deposition,
Network
wet deposition, total
deposition for
sulfur/nitrogen, surface
meteorology
GPMN-Gaseous Pollutant
NPS
33
1987
O3, N0x/N0/N02, SO2, CO,
http://www2.nature.nps.goV/air/Monitoring/network.cfm#data
Monitoring Network
surface meteorology, (plus
enhanced monitoring of CO,
NO, NOx, NOy, and SO2 plus
canister samples for VOC at
3 sites)
POMS-Portable Ozone
NPS
14
2002
O3, surface meteorology,
http://www2.nature.nps.qov/air/studies/port03.cfm
Monitoring Stations
with CASTNet-protocol
filter pack (optional) sulfate,
nitrate, ammonium, nitric
acid, sulfur dioxide
Passive Ozone Sampler
NPS
43
1995
O3 dose (weekly)
http://www2.nature.nps.qov/air/Studies/Passives.cfm
Monitoring Program
NADP/NTN—National
USGS
200 +
1978
Major Ions from
http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/
Atmospheric Deposition
precipitation chemistry
Program / National Trends
Network
NADP/MDN—National
None
90 +
1996
Mercury from precipitation
http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/mdn/
Atmospheric Deposition
chemistry
Program / Mercury
Deposition Network
AIRMoN—National
NOAA
8
1992
Major Ions from
http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/AIRMoN/
Atmospheric Deposition
precipitation chemistry
Program / Atmospheric
Integrated Research
Monitoring Network
Note: some sites began in
1976 as part of the DOE
MAP3S program; early data
are archived on NADP and
ARL servers.
IADIM—Integrated
EPA
20
1990
PAHs, PCBs, and
http://www.epa.qov/qlnpo/monitorinq/air/
Atmospheric Deposition
organochlorine compounds
Network
are measured in air and
precipitation samples
NAPS—National Air
Canada
152 +
1969
SO2, CO, Os, NO, NO2, NOx,
http://www.etc-cte.ec.qc.ca/NAPS/index e.html
Pollution Surveillance
VOCs, SVOCs, PM10, PM2.6,
Network
TSP, metals
July 2009
A-56
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Network
Lead
Agency
Number of
Sites
Initiated
Measurement
Parameters
Location of Information and/or Data
CAPMoN-Canadian Air
Canada
29
2002
03, NO, NO?, NOy, PAN,
http://www.msc.ec.qc.ca/capmon/index e.cfm
and Precipitation
NHs, PM2.6, PM10 and coarse
Monitoring Network
fraction mass, PM2.6
speciation, major ions for
particles and trace gases,
precipitation chemistry for
major ions
Mexican Air Quality
Mexico
52-62
Late
O3, NOx, CO, SO2, PM10,
http://www.ine.gob.mx/dgicur/calaire/indicadores.html
Network
1960's
TSP.VOC
Mexican City Ambient Air
Mexico
49
Late
O3, NOx, CO, SO2, PM10,
http://www.ine.gob.mx/dgicur/calaire/indicadores.html
Quality Monitoring
1960's
TSP.VOC
Network
AIR TOXICS MONITORING NETWORKS
NATTS—National Air
EPA
23
2005
VOCs, Carbonyls, PM10
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/airtoxpg.html
Toxics Trends Stations
metalsc, Hg
State/Local Air Toxics
EPA
250 +
1987
VOCs, Carbonyls, PM10
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/airtoxpg.html
Monitoring
metalsc, Hg
NDAMN-National Dioxin
EPA
34
1998 -
CDDs, CDFs, dioxin-like
http://cfpub.epa.qov/ncea/CFM/recordisplav.cfm7deid-54811
Air Monitoring Network
2005
PCBs
TRIBAL MONITORING NETWORKS
Tribal Monitoring9
EPA
120 +
1995
O3, N0x|N02, SO2,
PM2.BIPM10, CO, Pb
http://www.epa. qov/air/tribal/airproqs.html#ambmon
Industry / Research Networks
New Source Permit
None
variable
variable
O3, N0x|N02, SO2,
Contact specific industrial facilities
Monitoring
PM2.BIPM10, CO, Pb
HRM Network-Houston
None
9
1980
O3, NOx, PM2.BIPM10, CO,
http://hrm.radian.com/houston/how/index.htm
Regional Monitoring
SO2, Pb, VOCs, surface
Network
meteorology
ARIES / SEARCH—Aerosol
None
8
1992
O3, NO/NO2/NOY, SO2, CO,
http://www.atmospheric-research.com/studies/SEARCH/index.html
Research Inhalation
PM2.6/PM10, PM2.6
Epidemiology Study /
speciation, major Ions, NH3,
SouthEastern Aerosol
HNO3, scattering
Research and
coefficient, surface
Characterization Study
meteorology
experiment
SOS - SERON-Southern
EPA
-40
1990
O3, NO, NOy, VOCs, CO,
http://www.ncsu.edu/sos/pubs/sos3/State of SOS 3.pdf
Oxidant Study -
surface meteorology
Southeastern Regional
Oxidant Networks
NA TIONAL/GLOBAL RADIA TION NETWORKS
RadlMet—formerly
EPA
200 +
1973
Radionuclides and radiation
http://www.epa.qov/enviro/html/erams/
Environmental Radiation
Ambient Monitoring
System (ERAMS)
SASP ¦¦ Surface Air
DHS
41
1963
89Sr, 90Sr, naturally
http://www.eml.st.dhs.qov/databases/sasp/
Sampling Program
occurring radionuclides,
7Be, 21 OPb
NEWNET—Neighborhood
DOE
26
1993
Ionizing gamma radiation,
http://newnet.lanl.gov/
Environmental Watch
surface meteorology
Network
Solar Radiation Networks
July 2009
A-57
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Network
Lead
Agency
Number of
Sites
Initiated
Measurement
Parameters
Location of Information and/or Data
UV Index - EPA Sunrise
EPA
-50 U.S.
2002
Calculated UV radiation
http:llwww.epa.govlsunwiseluvindex.html
Program'
cities
index
UV Net ¦¦ Ultraviolet
EPA
21
199512004
Ultraviolet solar radiation
http://www.epa.gov/uvnet/access.html
Monitoring Program
(UV-B and UV-A bands),
irradiance, ozone, NO2
NEUBrew (NOAA-EPA
NOAA
6
2005
Ultraviolet solar radiation
http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/grad/neubrew/
Brewer Spectrophotometer
(UV-B and UV-A bands),
UV and Ozone Network
irradiance, ozone, SO2
UV-B Monitoring and
USDA
35
1992
Ultraviolet-B radiation
http://uvb.nrel.colostate.edu/UVB/index.isf
Research Program
SURFRAD - Surface
NOAA
7
1993
Solar and infrared radiation,
http://www.srrb.noaa.gov/surfrad/index.html
Radiation Budget Network
direct and diffuse solar
radiation, photosynthetically
active radiation, UVB,
spectral solar, and
meteorological parameters
AERONET-Aerosol
NASA co-
22 + other
1998
Aerosol spectral optical
http://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/index.html
RObotic NETwork
MPLNET - Micro-pulse
Lidar Network
located
networks
participants
8
2000
depths, aerosol size
distributions, and
precipitable water
Aerosols and cloud layer
heights
http://mplnet.gsfc.nasa.gov/
PRIMENet ¦¦ Park Research
NPS
14
1997
ozone, wet and dry
http://www.cfc.umt.edu/primenet/Assets/Announcements/99PReport.pdf
& Intensive Monitoring of
Ecosystems NETwork®
deposition, visibility, surface
meteorology, and ultraviolet
radiation
aNCore is a network proposed to replace NAMS, as a component of SLAMS; NAMS are currently designated as national trends sites.
bsurface meteorology includes wind direction and speed, temperature, precipitation, relative humidity, solar radiation (PAMS only).
ePMio metals may include arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, lead, manganese, nickel, and others.
dSome networks listed separately may also serve as subcomponents of other larger listed networks; as a result, some double counting of the number of individual monitors is likely.
"The number of sites indicated for tribal monitoring is actually the number of monitors, rather than sites. The number of sites with multiple monitors is probably < 80.
1 Sunrise program estimates UV exposure levels through modeling - does not include measurements.
9NEUBREW is a subset Original UV brewer network (UV Net); PRIMENET participated in UV Net program.
July 2009
A-58
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
All Monitor Distribution with Respect to Population Density
2005 Population Density
Atlanta PM2.5 Monitors (15 km buffer)
Population perSq Km
0 - 89
90 - 177
178 - 886
887 - 1772
1773 - 4431
4432 - 17722
] Kilometers
0 5 10 20 30 40 50
] Kilometers
0 15 30 60 90 120 150
Figure A-1. I M ¦ monitor distribution in comparison with population density, Atlanta, GA.
July 2009 A-59 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Kilometers
1 Kilometers
Figure A-2. PMio monitor distribution in comparison with population density, Atlanta, GA.
July 2009
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
2005 Population Density
Atlanta PM10 Monitors (15 km buffer)
Population per Sq Km
0-89
90 -177
178-886
887- 1772
1773-4431
4432-17722
-------
] Kilometers
0 5 10 20 30 40 50
1 Kilometers
0 15 30 60 90 120 150
Figure A-3. PM2.5 monitor distribution in comparison with population density, Birmingham, AL.
2005 Population Density
Birmingham PM2.5 Monitors {15 km buffer)
Population per Sq Km
4-23
24-47
48 - 235
236 - 469
470- 1173
1174-4692
July 2009 A-61 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
2005 Population Density
Birmingham PM10 Monitors (15 km buffer)
Population per Sq Km
4-23
24-47
48 - 235
236 - 469
470-1173
1174-4692
] Kilometers
0 5 10 20 30 40 50
1 Kilometers
0 15 30 60 90 120 150
Figure A-4. PMio monitor distribution in comparison with population density, Birmingham, AL.
July 2009
A-62
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1 Kilometers
0 15 30 60 90 120 150
Figure A-5. PM2,5 monitor distribution in comparison with population density, Chicago, IL.
2005 Population Density
Chicago PM2 5 Monitors (15 km buffer)
Population per Sq Km
0-220
221 -441
442 - 2204
2205 - 4407
4408- 11019
11020-44074
July 2009 A-63 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
D Kilometers
0 5 10 20 30 40 50
2005 Population Density
Chicago PM10 Monitors (15 km buffer)
Population per Sq Km
0-220
221 - 441
442 - 2204
2205 - 4407
4408- 11019
11020-44074
J Kilometers
0 15 30 60 90 120 150
Figure A-6. PMio monitor distribution in comparison with population density, Chicago, IL.
July 2009
A-64
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
] Kilometers
0 5 10 20 30 40 50
2005 Population Density
Denver PM2.5 Monitors {15 km buffer)
Population per Sq Km
0-67
68-135
136-673
674-1347
1348-3364
3365- 13456
] Kilometers
0 15 30 60 90 120 150
Figure A-7. PM2,5 monitor distribution in comparison with population density, Denver, CO.
July 2009 A-65 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
e)
*
4
$
] Kilometers
0 5 10 20 30 40 50
1
2005 Population Density
Denver PM10 Monitors (15km buffer)
Population per Sq Km
| 0-67
68-135
136-673
674- 1347
1348 - 3364
I 3365-13456
] Kilometers
0 15 30 60 90 120 150
Figure A-8. PMio monitor distribution in comparison with population density, Denver, CO.
July 2009 A-66 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Kilometers
] Kilometers
0 15 30 60 90 120 150
Figure A-9. PM2.5 monitor distribution in comparison with population density, Detroit, Ml.
2005 Population Density
Detroit PM2.5 Monitors (15 km buffer)
Population per Sq Km
| 0-164
Q 165-327
328-1637
1638 - 3274
3275 -8185
8186-32741
July 2009
A-67
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Kilometers
2005 Population Density
Detroit PM10 Monitors (15 km buffer)
Population per Sq Km
| 0-164
| 165-327
328-1637
1638 - 3274
3275-8185
I 8186- 32741
0 15 30
60
90
120
] Kilometers
150
Figure A-10. PMio monitor distribution in comparison with population density, Detroit, Ml.
July 2009
A-68
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
of
f /*
3 Kilometers
0 5 10 20 30 40 50
] Kilometers
2005 Population Density
Houston PM2.5 Monitors (15 km buffer)
Population per Sq Km
| 0- 182
| 183-364
365- 1822
1823-3644
3645-9109
I 9110-36435
0 15 30 60 90 120 150
Figure A-11. PMio monitor distribution in comparison with population density, Detroit, Ml.
July 2009
A-69
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Kilometers
0 5 10 20 30 40 50
2005 Population Density
Houston PM10 Monitors (15 km buffer)
Population per Sq Km
I 0 - 182
9110-36435
Kilometers
0 15 30 60 90 120 150
Figure A-12. PMio monitor distribution in comparison with population density, Houston, TX.
July 2009 A-70 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
] Kilometers
0 15 30 60 90 120 150
Figure A-13. I M ¦ monitor distribution in comparison with population density, Los Angeles, CA.
3 Kilometers
5 10 20 30 40 50
2005 Population Density
Los Angeles PM2.5 Monitors (15 km buffer)
Population per Sq Km
0-271
272 - 542
543-2711
2712-5422
5423- 13556
13557-54222
July 2009 A-71 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
~ Kilometers
5 10 20 30 40 50
I Kilometers
0 15 30 60 90 120 150
Figure A-14. PMio monitor distribution in comparison with population density, Los Angeles, CA.
2005 Population Density
Los Angeles PM10 Monitors (15km buffer)
Population per Sq Km
0-271
272 - 542
543 - 2711
2712 - 5422
5423- 13556
13557-54222
July 2009 A-72 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
0 5 10 20 30 40 50
2005 Population Density
New York PM2.5 Monitors (15 km buffer)
Population per Sq Km
I 0 - 832
|' 833- 1664
1665-8319
8320 - 16637
16638 -41593
I 41594- 166371
3 Kilometers
0 1530 60 90 120 150
Figure A-15. PM2.5 monitor distribution in comparison with population density. New York City, NY.
July 2009
A-73
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
•'*-> •
i Kilometers
0 5 10 20 30 40 50
2005 Population Density
I New York PM10 Monitors (15 km buffer)
Population per Sq Km
| 0-832
| 833 - 1664
1665- 8319
8320 - 16637
16638 -41593
I 41594 - 166371
] Kilometers
0 15 30 60 90 120 150
Figure A-16. PMio monitor distribution in comparison with population density, New York City, NY.
July 2009
A-74
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Kilometers
2005 Population Density
Philadelphia PM2.5 Monitors (15 km buffer)
Population per Sq Km
I 0-183
9145 - 36577
] Kilometers
0 15 30 60 90 120 150
Figure A-17. I M ¦ monitor distribution in comparison with population density, Philadelphia, PA.
July 2009
A-75
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1 M I Kilometers
0 5 10 20 30 40 50
2005 Population Density
Philadelphia PM10 Monitors (15 km buffer)
Population perSq Km
¦ 0 -183
Kilometers
0 15 30 60 90 120 150
Figure A-18. PMio monitor distribution in comparison with population density, Philadelphia, PA.
July 2009 A-76 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
«r
] Kilometers
0 5 10 20 30 40 50
2005 Population Density
Phoenix PM2.5 Monitors (15 km buffer)
Population per Sq Km
| 0-80
| 81 - 159
160-795
796- 1591
1592-3977
¦ 3978- 15907
] Kilometers
0 15 30 60 90 120 150
Figure A-19. PMz.s monitor distribution in comparison with population density. Phoenix, AZ.
July 2009 A-77 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Kilometers
~ Kilometers
0 15 30 60 90 120 150
2005 Population Density
Phoenix PM10 Monitors (15 km buffer)
lation per Sq Km
| 0-80
81 -159
160-795
796-1591
1592-3977
3978- 15907
July 2009
A-78
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
0 5 10
20 30
40
I Kilometers
50
n>
r
2005 Population Density
Pittsburgh PM2 5 Monitors (15 km buffer)
Population per Sq Km
| 6 - 204
| 205 - 409
410-2045
2046 - 4090
4091 - 10225
I 10226-40898
0 15 30
] Kilometers
60 90
120 150
Figure A-21. PM2,5 monitor distribution in comparison with population density, Pittsburgh, PA.
July 2009
A-79
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
0 5 10 20
30
40
zd Kilometers
50
2005 Population Density
Pittsburgh PM10 Monitors (15 km buffer)
Population per Sq Km
| 6 - 204
| 205 - 409
410-2045
2046 - 4090
4091 - 10225
I 10226-40898
0 15 30
60
90
120
3 Kilometers
150
Figure A-22. PMio monitor distribution in comparison with population density, Pittsburgh, PA.
July 2009
A-80
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
I Kilometers
0 5 10 20 30 40 50
TO
2005 Population Density
Riverside PM2.5 Monitors (15 km buffer)
Population perSq Km
| 0-89
| 90-178
179-892
893- 1784
1785-4460
¦ 4461 - 17838
] Kilometers
012.35 50 75 100 125
Figure A-23. PM.-.i monitor distribution in comparison with population density. Riverside, OA.
July 2009
A-81
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1 Kilometers
0 5 10 20 30 40 50
Of
c
3
2005 Population Density
Riverside PM10 Monitors (15 km buffer)
Population per Sq Km
| 0-89
| 90-178
179-892
893- 1784
1785 -4460
¦ 4461 -17838
1 Kilometers
0)2.95 50 75 100 125
Figure A-24. PMio monitor distribution in comparison with population density, Riverside, CA.
July 2009
A-82
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
] Kilometers
0 5 10 20 30 40 50
] Kilometers
0 15 30 60 90 120 150
Figure A-25. PM2.5 monitor distribution in comparison with population density, Seattle, WA.
2005 Population Density
Seattle PM2.5 Monitors (15km buffer)
ation per Sq Km
0-120
121 -240
241 -1201
1202 - 2402
2403 - 6006
6007 - 24022
July 2009 A-83 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
~ Kilometers
0 5 10 20 30 40 50
2005 Population Density
Seattle PM10 Monitors (15 Km buffer)
Population per Sq Km
0-120
121 - 240
241 -1201
1202 - 2402
2403 - 6006
6007 - 24022
I Kilometers
Figure A-26. PM2.5 monitor distribution in comparison with population density, Seattle, WA.
July 2009 A-84 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
' v
I Kilometers
0 5 10 20 30 40 50
2005 Population Density
St Louis PM2.5 Monitors (15 km buffer)
Population per Sq Km
| 0-54
55-109
110-544
545-1088
1089 - 2720
I 2721 - 10878
3 Kilometers
0 15 30 60 90 120 150
Figure A-27. PM2.5 monitor distribution in comparison with population density, St. Louis, M0.
July 2009
A-85
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
r
] Kilometers
0 5 10 20 30 40 50
2005 Population Density
St Louis PM10 Monitors (15 km buffer)
Population per Sq Km
| 0- 54
[ 55-109
110 - 544
545 - 1088
1089-2720
I 2721 - 10878
~ Kilometers
0 15 30 60 90 120 150
Figure A-28. PMio monitor distribution in comparison with population density, St. Louis, MO,
July 2009
A-86
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
A.2.
A.2.1.
Ambient PM Concentration
Speciation Trends Network Site Data
Copper — Annual
0 0
•° • 0
•
2* e
\ .
X. •
0
0
° ' * 'V„-;: *
•••
0 • 0 «° f ••
° « 0 0 40
!• ^
3 °8 ° J
. • •« 7°"°
©
. T v •
-•
,0"
~
s
0 0 #
•
ccpper(ug/m3): <=0.002
>0.002 to 0.004 >0.004 to 0.006 >0.006- 0.008
>o.ooe
Copper - Spring
o* •
0 •
"" ' ' : * f
° * ® 5 us *
t 0
x. •
0
• % °
* °a
f *• •
»
•
CQBHNW"n3) <*c.a»
O m m
>0 00? too ocm >oaMtooooe >0 oos-o one >oooe
Copper - Fall
•° •
1" 8
1.
Xe •
•
•
S • •
.
° • © ®°"o °
% " °»9 ofq#' o
* •0 IV?
.• bps
f " *
•
0 • #
cocp«ftua«>3) c»o oro
>Q CO? to 0 UW >0 OW to 0 006 >0006-0006 >DOtB
Copper - Summer
0
e
V
• o**c
•e °<*>
o D ^
<* °
o _ u A©® O
i
cnppffiuym3l '-onii? >0 OB? to POM ¦QQiMtn OOCfe >0 0(^-0 008 -POOS
Copper - Whiter
£b e
I •
Xc
0 • a "®
o e
o
0 V*
(Q«ar;tO»3J oOBK> >a nco to0flew >00MW0ta6 >0M-Q0CB >0008
Figure A-29. Three-vr avg of 24-h PM2.5 Ou concentrations measured at CSN sites across the U.S.,
2005-2007.
July 2009
A-87
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Iron - Annual
©
oo
CP
o*
0°
» •
*• *
o • «„
O O o®1
>P ° O
r°o° <
o o O
lron(ugAn3): <=0.05 >0.05 to 0.075 >0.075 lo 0.1
Iran - Spring
M
i
. • O' o9- *
A • =• '
°
• . P o*~ ©
05 to 0075 >0 075 Id 01
• •
>0.10125 >0.126
•* >
• •»
j0.05»CHJ75 •0.075(00-1 >01-0125 »0115
Iron - Summer
5 o v
s
°Q
I •
•
• t
o»
a*
0°. £*
O B oj
<8o° 0
O o
® O cgoo?
V
• ••
cgOa*
ft?.
<^0 05 "-O05 to 00 75
O
>0 075toQ1
>0.1-0125 >0125
Iron - Winter
C»
V
"m c "®L
° °-0075 «»0.1 >01*0-125 >0135
Three-yr avg of 24-h PM2.5 iron concentrations measured at DSN sites across the U.S.,
2005-2007
A-8
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
&
K
Ni - Annual
9
\
o
©
o° '
o
® cg©°
oo
O O
0 O
6
O 0
O°°o °°#
O O
8f*
G
o
Nickel[ug/m3): <=0.0005 >0.0005 to 0.001 >0.001 to 0.0015 >0.0015-0.002 >0.002
NI - Spring
• 0(9
® » #oZ°° '•
°° . r,o o >
¦ •• °
o
^ °
N.chC^U9frn3> <=00005 >0.0005 to OjOOI »0.001 to 0.0015 >00015-0002 >0002
NI - Fall
9
S
6 f- ¦ A ^
® 0 ePO O ® ©
oo ^ c
© -%•!
NiCk^ug^) « =00005 >0 0005 to 0 001 >0.001 to 0.0015 > 00015-0 002 >0.002
NI - Summer
K
*s
-o
»icka(ua»3); <-0.0005 >oooo5too.ooi >ooottoooots >0.0019-0002 .0.00:
NI - Winter
O
r v. ;•
5 - °4 .?4*>
°»9 °?
O ' •
X
§ )•
0 0©
o
o%*>
Nlckel(ogAn3). c^o.0005 > 0 0005 toOOOl >00011000015 >00015-0 002 >0 002
Figure A-31. Three-vr avg of 24-h PM2.5 nickel concentrations measured at CSN sites across the U.S.,
2005-2007
July 2009
A-89
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Lead -
Annual
& 0 0
0 0
0 0
&
e © «
a
kR
0 0
o°° 3
O O
0 0 a
„ 8
• 0 0
0 V-
0 °a & °
0 S&
tml
r%>
O
O
0 \ik'
* & go
t 0 a 0
0 OO o
0 u
a
<*><>
6 0 a>
0
0
0 O
O *
Q0
0 0 °o
•
I }°8
O O
O 00/ 9 •JP
o 0 0
0 0
0
0 A * 3-
0 V'.
\ #*"
. ®
0
0
0
• •
Lea0.005 to 0.01
>0.01 10 0.015
>0.015-0.02 >0.02
DO
%
Lead - Spring
° °° \ < a* J*
o *3 O r
<9 u OB f
® Q? V 0
a a ^ O
. * •••
L^aJ(n^rn3j <=0005 >0005 »Q01 >001100015 >0010-002 >0,02
Lead - Fall
•s
d
BO
%
a
%0
U»00150 0? >00?
Lead - Summer
A
<% « ® " oJb°
• D«VsSr
0 CPA
s 4..;°
• *» i
a -
(P°
LC3djUfl»i>3l <3)005 >0005 M 0.01 >001 to 0.015 >C01frOQ2 >002
Lead - Winter
e
%
.. • •• ^ °z$T
« <^3 **
0OO5ioQOt sfiOlMO-OlS >001W»0?
Figure A-32. Three-vr avg of 24-h PM2.5 lead concentrations measured at CSN sites across the U.S.
2005-2007
July 2009 A-90 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Selenium - Annual
% <£
oO
GO ° o
«b„
9
O cPg
@ cg©o
O "(V op
°c oGf
o 0 b 0 0
® O O
Oo ®
Selemum(ug/m3): <=0.001 >0.001 to 0.002 >0.002 to 0.003 >0.003-0.004 >0.004
Selenium - Spring
O
o
%
o •
j9 0 * °J»
««:w
8 <9«>=- "
"•5 of-l".
0 • D » 0 o
SriB>tum(u^rt3) *-Q 001 >0.001 to 0 002 ¦" 00." jo QQ03 .-0 OCO-O 00*1 >0 OM
t-o
» ,
Fall
* 9 # o°cO o
°"2 ¦>"?.£ *.
0 . • *«S °«°
so o 9 9
SeieniumCugmiS) <=0001 >0 001 to 0 003 >0 003io0003 >0003-0 004 >0 001
Selenium - Summer
jgS
ore.
°» «>0° W
8
J ^ C5 O
ow o 0 oir o
S<*erHum(u9*ft3) <=0.001 >0.001 to 0002 >0 00210 0003 >0 003-0 004 >OOW
Selenium - Winter
°Q
a
0.
'• „ ^„0 001 to 0 003 >0 Oft? In 0 003 >0 0030 004 >0 OOj
Figure A-33. Three-yr avg of 24-h PM2.5 selenium concentrations measured at CSN sites across the
U.S., 2005 2007
July 2009
A-91
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Vanadium - Annual
<9
o o
8
V» f ° c
4. o ® %o O,
0 *g°
1 £°° 00
o
o o ^3 rp
°e o o °£
a o„0 0 °
Vana(fum(ug/hn3): *=0.004 >0.004 to 0,006 >0.006 to 0.008 >0.008-0.01 >0.01
Vanadium - Spring
O
. *f* =
s ;•
o _» a> jP o
°o • 0 ojr ©
. .
so O • #
vanadlum(ug/m3> <*0(KM >0 004to0 0fl6 >0006 to 0 008 >0008-0 01 >001
Vanadium — Fall
%
9 „ ffi
« » + t
* f £
& a o
© 0
I
9 •
vanadium (ug/in 3) <=0.0(M > 0 004 to 0 0
>0 00610 0 008 >0 008-0 01 >0 01
Vanadium - Summar
.y
* i » -
o o °
O ° o® 00(Mto0 006 >OOO6toOOO0 >0 006-0 01 >0 01
•%
<>0
I.
a
Vanadium - Winter
o rf> I » -
* « J."" •
O 0 ® a° a*® ff> «
° o "® • D '
. • »o!
Vana*um{ugfrn3) <=0 004 > 0004 to 0 006 >000610 0 003 >0 008-0 01 >0.01
Figure A-34. Three-yr avg of 24-h PM2.5 vanadium concentrations measured at DSN sites across the
U.S., 2005 2007
July 2009
A-92
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
A.2.2. Intraurban Variability
The following figures and tables exemplify the intraurban variability among PM2.5,
PMio'2.5 and PM10 measurements for select CSAs/CBSAs (2005-2007) including Atlanta,
Birmingham, Chicago, Denver, Detroit, Houston, New York City, Philadelphia, Phoenix,
Riverside, Seattle and St. Louis. Maps are included to show monitor locations relative to
major roadways. Box plots show the median and interquartile range of concentrations with
whiskers extending to the 5th and 95th percentiles at each site during (l) winter
(December-February); (2) spring (March-May); (3) summer (June-August); and (4) fall
(September-November). Tables of inter-sampler comparison statistics and scatter plots of
inter-sampler correlation vs. distance illustrate variability present in each area.
July 2009
A-93
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
July 2009
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
Figure A-35. Pib.s monitor distribution and major highways, Atlanta, GA.
• Atlanta PM2.5 Monitors
Atlanta Interstates
Atlanta Major Highways
Atlanta
0 10 20 40 60 80 100
3 Kilometers
-------
Site A 13-063-0091
Site B 13-067-0003
SiteC 13-067-0004
Site D 13-089-0002
SiteE 13-089-2001
Site F 13-121-0032
SiteG 13-135-0002
SiteH 13-139-0003
Site I 13-223-0003
0
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
Mean
1
16.2
16.2
15.4
15.3
15.2
15.7
15.2
13.9
14.4
Obs
2
351
352
339
1014
946
1036
221
336
344
SD
3
7.5
7.9
7.7
7.2
7.6
8.2
7.1
6.9
7.6
40 -
30 -
CT>
3.
c.
O 20 '
4-»
ro
+-'
c
en
u
c
o
° 10
1=wiriter
2=spring Q _
3=summer
4=fall 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 123 4
Figure A-36. Box plots illustrating the seasonal distribution of 24-h avg PM2.5 concentrations for
Atlanta, GA.
Table A-t. Inter-sampler correlation statistics for each pair of PM2.5 monitors reporting to AQS for
Atlanta, GA.
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
A
1.00
0.88
0.87
0.93
0.89
0.91
0.85
0.72
0.85
(0.0,0.00)
(5.2,0.11)
(6.2,0.12)
(3.9,0.11)
(5.3,0.12)
(4.6,0.11)
(6.9,0.15)
(8.7,0.19)
(7.2,0.15)
351
330
310
330
315
334
207
319
326
B
1.00
0.96
0.89
0.88
0.91
0.88
0.78
0.88
(0.0,0.00)
(4.1,0.08)
(5.7,0.12)
(4.6,0.10)
(3.6,0.08)
(5.6,0.13)
(9.0,0.17)
(6.5,0.13)
352
309
327
314
333
205
313
321
C
1.00
0.87
0.86
0.88
0.85
0.79
0.90
(0.0,0.00)
(5.2,0.12)
(5.6,0.11)
(4.4,0.10)
(5.8,0.13)
(7.9,0.17)
(4.5,0.11)
339
315
304
324
193
298
303
D
CT
1.00
0.89
0.80
0.87
0.74
0.82
(0.0,0.00)
(4.8,0.12)
(3.7,0.11)
(5.8,0.13)
(8.3,0.18)
(7.3,0.15)
1014
883
978
208
314
322
E
1.00
0.79
0.88
0.74
0.83
(0.0,0.00)
(3.8,0.11)
(5.3,0.12)
(7.8,0.17)
(6.4,0.14)
946
904
208
305
309
F
R
1.00
0.88
0.70
0.84
(P90, COD)
(0.0,0.00)
(5.3,0.12)
(8.5,0.19)
(6.3,0.14)
N
1036
213
321
327
G
1.00
0.73
0.79
(0.0,0.00)
(8.8,0.17)
(7.4,0.15)
221
195
198
H
1.00
0.76
(0.0,0.00)
(8.7,0.17)
336
309
I 1.00
(0.0,0.00)
344
July 2009
A-95
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1.00
0.80
~ ~ ~
~ « ti
~ 4*
~
0.60
o
o
0.40
0.20
0.00 ^ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Distance Between Samplers (km)
Figure A-37. PM2.5 inter-sampler correlations as a function of distance between monitors for Atlanta,
GA.
July 2009
A-96
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
a
r
Birmingham PM2.5 Monitors
Birmingham Interstates
Birmingham Major Highways
Birmingham
0 10 20 40 60 80
100
n Kilometers
Figure A-38. FM2.5 monitor distribution and major highways, Birmingham, AL
July 2009
A-97
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Site A
Site B
SiteC
Site D
Site E
Site F
SiteG
Site H
Site!
Site J
AQS Site ID
01-073-0023
01-073-1005
01-073-1009
01-073-1010
01-073-2003
01-073-2006
01-073-5002
01-073-5003
01-117-0006
01-127-0002
A
Mean 18.9
Obs 1087
SD 102
50
40
30
20
c
Ol
u
c
o
u
10
1=winter
2=spring
3=summer 0
4=fall
B
15.9
363
363
C
14 1
359
8.2
D
16.2
182
8.1
E
17.7
1079
9.4
8.2
15,4
364
7.8
G
14.8
363
7.9
H
14.9
360
8.3
I
14.6
361
7.6
J
14 4
351
7.5
1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234
Figure A-3S. Box plots illustrating the seasonal distribution of 24-h avg PM2.5 concentrations for
Birmingham, AL.
July 2009
A-98
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table A-2. Inter-sampler correlation statistics for each pair of pm2.5 monitors reporting to AQS for
Birmingham, AL.
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
A
1.00
0.91
0.86
0.91
0.88
0.91
0.87
0.88
0.88
0.84
(0.0,0.00)
(10.4,0.15)
(13.7,0.21)
(9.7,0.13)
(8.1,0.13)
(10.8,0.15)
(12.6,0.18)
(11.7,0.18)
(12.3,0.18)
(12.5,0.19)
1087
360
356
182
1072
361
360
357
358
348
B
1.00
0.93
0.93
0.85
0.96
0.91
0.93
0.93
0.89
(0.0,0.00)
(5.3,0.12)
(4.7,0.09)
(8.3,0.15)
(3.6,0.08)
(5.4,0.11)
(5.1,0.11)
(4.9,0.10)
(6.1,0.12)
363
356
181
359
358
360
355
358
348
C
1.00
0.93
0.81
0.93
0.91
0.94
0.90
0.90
(0.0,0.00)
(5.9,0.13)
(10.1,0.20)
(4.6,0.12)
(4.3,0.12)
(4.0,0.10)
(4.9,0.12)
(4.9,0.11)
359
180
355
354
355
350
353
343
D
1.00
0.88
0.96
0.95
0.95
0.93
0.89
(0.0,0.00)
(7.9,0.12)
(3.6,0.08)
(3.8,0.09)
(4.7,0.10)
(4.7,0.10)
(6.1,0.12)
182
179
179
181
179
180
174
E
1.00
0.87
0.85
0.85
0.86
0.81
(0.0,0.00)
(8.1,0.15)
(8.7,0.16)
(8.8,0.17)
(9.2,0.16)
(10.6,0.18)
1079
360
359
356
357
347
F
R
1.00
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.90
(P90, COD)
(0.0,0.00)
(3.9,0.09)
(4.1,0.10)
(3.4,0.09)
(5.6,0.11)
N
364
359
354
357
348
G
1.00
0.96
0.92
0.89
(0.0,0.00)
(3.3,0.08)
(4.5,0.10)
(4.9,0.11)
363
356
359
350
H
1.00
0.91
0.93
(0.0,0.00)
(5.0,0.11)
(4.3,0.09)
360
354
344
I
1.00
0.87
(0.0,0.00)
(5.8,0.12)
361
349
J
1.00
(0.0,0.00)
351
40 50 60
Distance Between Samplers (km)
100
Figure A-40. PM2.5 inter-sampler correlations as a function of distance between monitors for
Birmingham, AL.
July 2009
A-99
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
m
r
* Chicago PM2.5 Monitors
Chicago Interstates
Chicago Major Highways
Chicago
0 10 20 40 60 80
100
3 Kilometers
Figure A-41. PM2.5 monitor distribution and major highways, Chicago, It
July 2009
A-100
DRAFT-00 NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Site A
Site B
SiteC
SiieD
Site E
Site F
SiteG
SteH
Site I
Site J
SiteK
AGS Site 10
17-031-0022
17-031-0050
17-031-0052
17-031-0057
17-031-0076
17-031-1016
17-031-2001
17-031-3103
17-031-3301
17-031-4007
17-0314201
Mean 15.3
Obs 178
SO 88
50 •
40
fr-
E
30
e
0
S 20
s
c
u
1 10
1---winter
2=spring
3=summer
4=fall
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
i
J
K
14 7
15.6
15.1
14.8
16,4
146
15.9
152
12.6
13.2
343
984
333
351
345
350
335
361
356
361
84
89
90
6.2
91
82
85
8.3
7.8
8,2
1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 123 4
Site L
Site M
SteN
SfeO
SfeP
Site Q
SieR
SteS
SieT
SieU
AQS Site ID
17-031-6005
17-043-4002
17-089-0003
17-089-0007
17-097-1007
17-111-0001
17-197-1002
17-197-1011
18-089-0006
18-089-0022
sr
£
t
Mean 15.1
Obs 331
SD 87
50
40 ~
c
O
c
at
u
c
o
u
30 -
20 -
10 -
1=w inter
2=spring
3=summer
4=fall
M
14.0
179
85
N
13.5
176
8.5
0
143
174
8.9
P
12.1
181
8.2
Q
12.3
347
7.5
R
14.0
175
8.5
S
11.7
164
7.2
T
144
330
7.7
U
15.6
351
8.2
1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234
July 2009
A-101
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
SiteV
SiteW
SiteX
SrteY
SiteZ
AGS Site ID
18-089-0026
18-089-0027
18-089-1003
18-089-2004
18-089-2010 50
SiteAA 18-091-0011
Site AB 18-091-0012
Site AC 18-127-0020
Site AD 18-127-0024 40
Site AE 55-059-0019
ST
E
cn
3 30
c
.2
TO
£ 20
u
c
Q
u
10 H
V
W
X
Y
Z
AA
AB
AC
AD
AE
Wean
16.5
13.7
14,1
140
140
12.4
12.6
12.6
13,4
12,9
Obs
333
328
334
340
347
532
348
336
346
355
SD
88
7,4
77
7,5
8.1
7.5
7.5
7,5
8.1
7,8
1-winter
2=spring
3=summer
4-fail
123 4 1234 1234 12 34 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234
Figure A-42. Box plots illustrating the seasonal distribution of 24-h avg PM2.5 concentrations for
Chicago, IL.
Table A-3. Inter-sampler correlation statistics for each pair of PM2.5 monitors reporting to AQS for
Chicago, IL.
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N 0
A
1.00 0.98
0.93
0.94
0.97
0.95
0.97
0.94
0.96
0.91
0.95
0.95
0.91
0.92
0.89
(0.0,0.00) (3.1,0.08)
(5.5,0.12)
(4.7,0.11)
(3.9,0.09)
(5.7,0.13)
(3.9,0.09)
(4.6,0.12)
(4.2,0.11)
(6.8,0.16)
(5.8,0.14)
(4.6,0.12)
(5.7,0.15)
(6.6,0.15)
(6.0,0.16)
178 156
176
149
154
154
151
156
164
163
166
141
165
152
156
B
1.00
0.94
0.95
0.97
0.95
0.97
0.95
0.96
0.93
0.93
0.95
0.92
0.93
0.90
(0.0,0.00)
(4.6,0.11)
(3.6,0.10)
(3.3,0.08)
(5.2,0.13)
(2.7,0.07)
(4.3,0.11)
(3.4,0.09)
(6.3,0.16)
(6.5,0.15)
(4.0,0.10)
(5.1,0.15)
(5.8,0.14)
(5.2,0.15)
343
320
276
300
296
296
289
312
315
306
288
157
152
150
C
1.00
0.96
0.92
0.91
0.90
0.94
0.92
0.90
0.91
0.92
0.88
0.92
0.86
(0.0,0.00)
(4.4,0.11)
(5.7,0.11)
(4.8,0.11)
(6.0,0.12)
(4.3,0.11)
(5.5,0.11)
(8.8,0.18)
(7.2,0.17)
(4.5,0.12)
(7.5,0.16)
(7.9,0.16)
(7.5,0.17)
984
313
325
318
324
312
336
332
337
311
178
175
173
D
1.00
0.94
0.93
0.94
0.95
0.94
0.93
0.93
0.92
0.89
0.96
0.88
(0.0,0.00)
(3.8,0.10)
(4.2,0.12)
(3.8,0.10)
(4.1,0.13)
(3.3,0.10)
(6.2,0.15)
(5.2,0.14)
(3.6,0.10)
(5.3,0.14)
(5.1,0.13)
(4.5,0.15)
333
286
280
283
270
299
296
289
273
151
146
145
E
1.00
0.95
0.98
0.95
0.98
0.92
0.92
0.95
0.95
0.94
0.92
(0.0,0.00)
(5.0,0.11)
(2.4,0.06)
(4.5,0.11)
(2.6,0.07)
(5.8,0.16)
(5.7,0.15)
(4.4,0.10)
(4.8,0.11)
(5.0,0.11)
(4.6,0.13)
351
306
304
292
320
321
313
286
159
154
152
F
1.00
0.95
0.95
0.96
0.89
0.91
0.94
0.94
0.94
0.94
(0.0,0.00)
(5.1,0.12)
(4.5,0.12)
(4.5,0.10)
(8.5,0.20)
(7.9,0.19)
(5.7,0.12)
(7.0,0.15)
(7.9,0.17)
(7.9,0.16)
345
301
294
322
323
311
285
161
157
154
G
1.00
0.95
0.97
0.90
0.91
0.94
0.95
0.95
0.95
(0.0,0.00)
(4.9,0.12)
(3.0,0.07)
(6.3,0.15)
(5.8,0.14)
(4.7,0.10)
(4.2,0.11)
(5.0,0.12)
(4.4,0.12)
350
284
315
318
309
287
154
149
148
H
1.00
0.95
0.91
0.92
0.94
0.93
0.94
0.91
(0.0,0.00)
(4.3,0.11)
(7.4,0.19)
(6.4,0.18)
(4.4,0.13)
(6.4,0.16)
(7.1,0.16)
(5.9,0.17)
335
311
309
302
275
164
157
156
I
1.00
0.90
0.92
0.96
0.96
0.95
0.93
(0.0,0.00)
(6.7,0.17)
(5.9,0.16)
(3.9,0.10)
(4.6,0.12)
(5.3,0.13)
(4.6,0.14)
361
341
328
304
173
169
166
J
1.00
0.92
0.90
0.91
0.94
0.89
July 2009 A-102 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N 0
(0.0,0.00)
(4.7,0.13)
(7.0,0.17)
(5.7,0.14)
(4.4,0.12)
(5.4,0.16)
356
330
304
171
165
164
K
1.00
0.93
0.94
0.96
0.92
R
(0.0,0.00)
(5.9,0.15)
(5.2,0.13)
(4.0,0.10)
(4.9,0.15)
(P90, COD)
361
292
173
166
167
L
N
1.00
0.94
0.95
0.92
(0.0,0.00)
(6.4,0.13)
(5.9,0.13)
(6.0,0.14)
331
147
142
142
M
1.00
0.97
0.95
(0.0,0.00)
(3.9,0.09)
(2.7,0.11)
179
160
165
N
1.00
0.95
(0.0,0.00)
(3.8,0.11)
176
152
0
1.00
(0.0,0.00)
174
1.
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
AA
AB
AC
AD
AE
A
0.90
0.89
0.91
0.83
0.96
0.83
0.93
0.95
0.96
0.95
0.98
0.94
0.93
0.95
0.94
0.88
(8.0,0.19)
(7.5,0.19)
(5.6,0.16)
(8.0,0.24)
(4.4,0.11)
(7.2,0.16)
(5.9,0.13)
(4.7,0.12)
(4.4,0.10)
(4.5,0.12)
(3.4,0.10)
(5.8,0.17)
(6.8,0.17)
(6.0,0.16)
(5.4,0.15)
(7.1,0.17)
166
151
157
145
154
162
159
149
156
160
160
154
159
158
159
162
B
0.90
0.90
0.91
0.83
0.95
0.81
0.94
0.95
0.96
0.96
0.98
0.94
0.92
0.93
0.87
0.87
(8.0,0.20)
(6.7,0.17)
(5.5,0.16)
(8.0,0.24)
(3.9,0.10)
(6.7,0.15)
(5.2,0.11)
(5.0,0.11)
(4.0,0.10)
(4.2,0.11)
(2.9,0.09)
(5.9,0.17)
(6.8,0.17)
(6.5,0.18)
(5.3,0.16)
(7.2,0.17)
159
290
153
143
292
310
300
289
292
300
309
288
308
299
305
311
C
0.89
0.91
0.86
0.78
0.90
0.76
0.89
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.93
0.87
0.88
0.88
0.84
0.79
(10.2,0.22)
(8.3,0.19)
(7.1,0.17)
(10.4,0.25)
(6.9,0.13)
(8.5,0.18)
(6.4,0.13)
(7.7,0.15)
(7.1,0.14)
(7.9,0.15)
(6.7,0.15)
(8.6,0.20)
(8.9,0.20)
(9.6,0.21)
(8.7,0.18)
(8.5,0.20)
180
324
172
164
309
327
315
305
311
317
323
491
323
313
323
333
D
0.90
0.94
0.89
0.80
0.92
0.74
0.91
0.94
0.93
0.93
0.95
0.92
0.90
0.90
0.85
0.87
(7.6,0.19)
(6.5,0.16)
(5.5,0.14)
(8.6,0.22)
(5.0,0.12)
(7.8,0.19)
(5.9,0.13)
(5.4,0.13)
(5.4,0.13)
(5.8,0.13)
(4.8,0.13)
(6.4,0.17)
(6.9,0.18)
(7.0,0.19)
(6.2,0.17)
(6.9,0.17)
153
278
147
135
280
294
283
273
282
284
292
274
291
287
290
297
E
0.91
0.92
0.94
0.87
0.94
0.77
0.94
0.96
0.95
0.96
0.96
0.93
0.91
0.90
0.86
0.87
(8.3,0.18)
(5.6,0.16)
(4.9,0.12)
(7.1,0.20)
(4.1,0.10)
(7.5,0.17)
(5.6,0.12)
(4.3,0.10)
(4.4,0.11)
(3.9,0.09)
(3.9,0.11)
(5.8,0.17)
(6.9,0.17)
(6.8,0.18)
(6.3,0.16)
(7.3,0.17)
160
294
155
142
300
320
310
299
303
310
317
292
314
304
313
318
F
0.91
0.92
0.92
0.87
0.90
0.74
0.93
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.93
0.91
0.90
0.87
0.83
0.84
(10.5,0.23)
(8.6,0.20)
(8.5,0.17)
(10.0,0.25)
(6.9,0.14)
(9.2,0.19)
(5.4,0.11)
(8.2,0.16)
(7.2,0.15)
(7.6,0.15)
(6.3,0.16)
(8.5,0.22)
(9.4,0.21)
(9.1,0.23)
(8.3,0.20)
(9.3,0.21)
163
295
159
144
302
320
308
297
305
311
316
292
317
306
317
322
G
0.91
0.91
0.95
0.88
0.94
0.76
0.95
0.97
0.96
0.97
0.96
0.92
0.92
0.90
0.87
0.85
(7.9,0.19)
(5.9,0.16)
(4.1,0.12)
(7.1,0.21)
(3.9,0.10)
(7.5,0.17)
(4.7,0.10)
(3.7,0.09)
(3.6,0.09)
(3.5,0.08)
(3.4,0.11)
(5.7,0.17)
(6.8,0.16)
(6.8,0.18)
(5.9,0.15)
(7.5,0.17)
156
292
154
140
293
315
303
293
296
303
312
288
311
300
308
314
H
0.91
0.93
0.92
0.82
0.92
0.78
0.92
0.91
0.92
0.92
0.93
0.90
0.89
0.88
0.83
0.88
(9.3,0.23)
(7.1,0.20)
(6.6,0.17)
(9.6,0.26)
(5.7,0.13)
(7.5,0.17)
(6.1,0.13)
(6.8,0.15)
(5.9,0.15)
(6.7,0.14)
(5.9,0.15)
(7.7,0.22)
(8.1,0.22)
(8.3,0.22)
(8.1,0.20)
(7.6,0.20)
165
284
158
145
287
307
297
288
292
299
303
281
301
293
301
307
I
0.91
0.92
0.95
0.87
0.93
0.78
0.94
0.95
0.94
0.95
0.95
0.92
0.91
0.89
0.85
0.86
(8.2,0.21)
(6.1,0.17)
(4.7,0.12)
(7.7,0.22)
(4.2,0.10)
(7.1,0.17)
(5.0,0.10)
(4.6,0.11)
(4.8,0.11)
(4.7,0.10)
(4.2,0.13)
(6.5,0.18)
(6.8,0.18)
(7.4,0.19)
(6.6,0.17)
(7.0,0.18)
175
314
168
154
318
338
327
316
322
328
335
306
334
323
334
339
J
0.92
0.91
0.90
0.85
0.89
0.73
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.91
0.89
0.88
0.87
0.82
0.87
(5.6,0.14)
(5.1,0.14)
(6.2,0.16)
(6.7,0.21)
(6.1,0.17)
(8.6,0.22)
(8.7,0.20)
(6.0,0.16)
(6.3,0.16)
(6.2,0.16)
(5.9,0.16)
(5.6,0.16)
(5.8,0.16)
(6.3,0.17)
(6.3,0.17)
(6.4,0.15)
173
313
167
153
319
341
329
317
327
329
337
307
335
327
336
340
K
0.94
0.93
0.93
0.86
0.91
0.78
0.89
0.91
0.90
0.91
0.92
0.92
0.91
0.90
0.85
0.91
(5.2,0.12)
(4.2,0.12)
(6.1,0.16)
(7.2,0.20)
(5.1,0.16)
(8.0,0.21)
(8.4,0.19)
(5.2,0.15)
(5.5,0.15)
(5.2,0.15)
(5.4,0.14)
(5.2,0.15)
(4.9,0.15)
(5.3,0.16)
(5.3,0.16)
(5.1,0.13)
176
298
169
155
310
327
319
304
313
319
325
301
325
315
323
328
L
0.90
0.92
0.93
0.86
0.93
0.75
0.92
0.93
0.93
0.92
0.95
0.92
0.92
0.90
0.85
0.89
(9.3,0.20)
(6.7,0.17)
(6.7,0.14)
(8.9,0.21)
(5.5,0.12)
(8.2,0.19)
(6.2,0.13)
(5.7,0.13)
(5.8,0.13)
(6.2,0.13)
(5.0,0.13)
(7.2,0.17)
(7.6,0.17)
(7.4,0.18)
(7.3,0.16)
(7.1,0.17)
151
285
144
132
285
301
290
282
286
293
299
277
299
286
294
301
M
0.92
0.95
0.96
0.88
0.91
0.74
0.90
0.94
0.92
0.93
0.92
0.91
0.91
0.88
0.89
0.89
(6.2,0.16)
(4.5,0.14)
(3.4,0.09)
(6.3,0.19)
(5.9,0.14)
(9.0,0.22)
(8.0,0.17)
(4.7,0.12)
(5.2,0.14)
(5.0,0.13)
(5.8,0.16)
(6.4,0.17)
(5.5,0.15)
(6.9,0.19)
(6.2,0.17)
(6.9,0.17)
175
157
165
152
162
171
166
159
164
168
169
158
168
165
168
171
N
0.92
0.98
0.94
0.89
0.92
0.81
0.91
0.92
0.91
0.93
0.93
0.91
0.91
0.88
0.89
0.90
(5.4,0.13)
(2.8,0.08)
(4.1,0.12)
(5.8,0.17)
(6.2,0.13)
(7.9,0.20)
(8.3,0.17)
(4.9,0.12)
(5.6,0.14)
(4.6,0.13)
(4.9,0.15)
(5.4,0.15)
(4.9,0.14)
(6.5,0.17)
(5.4,0.16)
(6.0,0.14)
162
151
153
140
156
165
160
157
158
162
165
153
162
158
161
165
0
0.88
0.92
0.93
0.86
0.89
0.75
0.89
0.92
0.90
0.91
0.90
0.89
0.90
0.87
0.87
0.87
(7.5,0.18)
(4.9,0.15)
(3.8,0.13)
(6.5,0.20)
(5.9,0.15)
(8.8,0.22)
(7.6,0.17)
(5.1,0.13)
(5.8,0.15)
(5.5,0.14)
(5.6,0.16)
(6.1,0.17)
(5.7,0.16)
(7.0,0.19)
(6.2,0.17)
(7.0,0.18)
166
152
157
145
155
166
161
154
158
161
162
151
161
159
162
166
P
1.00
0.92
0.90
0.84
0.88
0.73
0.87
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.90
0.89
0.90
0.89
0.89
0.92
(0.0,0.00)
(5.2,0.13)
(7.1,0.17)
(7.2,0.20)
(8.5,0.20)
(12.0,0.26)
(10.9,0.24)
(6.7,0.18)
(7.4,0.18)
(6.9,0.18)
(7.6,0.19)
(6.1,0.16)
(5.7,0.15)
(6.3,0.17)
(6.4,0.17)
(5.7,0.13)
181
159
166
152
164
174
168
160
166
169
171
158
170
167
170
173
Q
1.00
0.92
0.85
0.88
0.71
0.89
0.90
0.88
0.90
0.90
0.89
0.88
0.86
0.82
0.91
(0.0,0.00)
(5.4,0.16)
(7.2,0.19)
(6.1,0.18)
(9.3,0.24)
(9.1,0.21)
(5.5,0.16)
(6.5,0.16)
(5.5,0.16)
(6.3,0.16)
(5.3,0.16)
(5.3,0.16)
(6.3,0.18)
(5.9,0.17)
(5.5,0.14)
347
154
139
290
309
296
289
294
302
306
292
303
293
303
310
R
1.00
0.91
0.93
0.76
0.90
0.94
0.93
0.94
0.91
0.92
0.92
0.88
0.89
0.89
(0.0,0.00)
(5.8,0.18)
(5.1,0.13)
(8.6,0.22)
(7.5,0.17)
(4.4,0.11)
(5.0,0.13)
(4.0,0.12)
(5.8,0.17)
(6.2,0.17)
(5.6,0.16)
(7.1,0.19)
(6.4,0.17)
(7.1,0.17)
175
143
157
167
161
153
160
161
164
153
164
160
163
166
S
1.00
0.83
0.66
0.81
0.86
0.83
0.87
0.83
0.84
0.84
0.81
0.82
0.80
(0.0,0.00)
(8.5,0.22)
(11.3,0.28)
(11.6,0.26)
(6.7,0.20)
(8.0,0.21)
(7.2,0.19)
(7.3,0.22)
(6.1,0.21)
(7.4,0.20)
(7.8,0.23)
(7.1,0.22)
(9.0,0.22)
164
144
153
148
143
146
148
151
141
151
149
148
153
T
1.00
0.81
0.93
0.95
0.97
0.96
0.97
0.92
0.91
0.92
0.87
0.85
(0.0,0.00)
(5.9,0.15)
(6.2,0.12)
(3.4,0.10)
(3.2,0.09)
(2.9,0.08)
(3.2,0.12)
(5.2,0.17)
(5.5,0.16)
(5.4,0.18)
(4.9,0.15)
(6.6,0.18)
330
318
307
297
302
305
315
284
312
311
313
319
U
1.00
0.77
0.79
0.81
0.81
0.81
0.78
0.76
0.79
0.74
0.69
(0.0,0.00)
(7.6,0.17)
(6.6,0.17)
(6.0,0.15)
(6.3,0.16)
(6.4,0.17)
(8.1,0.22)
(8.4,0.22)
(7.2,0.21)
(7.0,0.19)
(10.0,0.23)
351
327
319
322
326
336
305
334
324
333
338
V
1.00
0.96
0.97
0.95
0.95
0.93
0.91
0.90
0.88
0.83
(0.0,0.00)
(5.9,0.11)
(4.8,0.10)
(5.8,0.12)
(5.7,0.14)
(7.7,0.20)
(8.6,0.20)
(8.3,0.21)
(6.9,0.17)
(9.3,0.22)
339
306
314
316
325
292
323
314
321
325
W
1.00
0.98
0.98
0.96
0.95
0.93
0.92
0.89
0.85
(0.0,0.00)
(2.8,0.06)
(2.5,0.07)
(3.6,0.11)
(4.5,0.15)
(4.8,0.15)
(5.4,0.16)
(3.9,0.13)
(6.9,0.17)
July 2009
A-103
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
AA
AB
AC
AD
AE
328
299
306
312
281
310
306
311
316
X
1.00
0.98
0.97
0.95
0.93
0.94
0.91
0.85
(0.0,0.00)
(2.3,0.07)
(3.3,0.10)
(4.6,0.14)
(4.9,0.14)
(4.9,0.15)
(3.6,0.11)
(6.8,0.17)
334
311
318
286
319
305
316
321
Y
1.00
0.97
0.95
0.93
0.92
0.89
0.85
(0.0,0.00)
(3.6,0.11)
(4.7,0.16)
(5.0,0.15)
(5.3,0.17)
(4.4,0.14)
(6.7,0.18)
340
322
296
322
311
321
326
Z
1.00
0.95
0.93
0.94
0.89
0.86
(0.0,0.00)
(4.6,0.15)
(5.3,0.15)
(4.9,0.15)
(4.1,0.14)
(6.8,0.17)
347
305
331
321
328
335
AA
1.00
0.98
0.97
0.89
0.88
(0.0,0.00)
(2.4,0.07)
(2.9,0.08)
(3.2,0.11)
(5.9,0.17)
532
305
287
300
304
AB
1.00
0.96
0.89
0.86
(0.0,0.00)
(3.1,0.09)
(3.7,0.11)
(6.5,0.17)
346
317
328
333
AC
1.00
0.91
0.85
(0.0,0.00)
(2.8,0.10)
(6.7,0.17)
336
320
322
AD
1.00
0.79
(0.0,0.00)
(7.2,0.18)
346
332
AE
1.00
(0.0,0.00)
355
~ **• ~ ~ .*?+ «, * *
~ ~ ~ • ~ * ~ ~*~
~
~
10 20 30 40 50 60
Distance Between Samplers (km)
70
80
90
100
Figure A-43. PM2.5 inter-sampler correlations as a function of distance between monitors for Chicago,
IL.
July 2009
A-104
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
q)\
• Denver PM2.5 Monitors
Denver Interstates
Denver Major Highways
Denver
0 10 20 40 60 80
100
I Kilometers
Figure A-44. FM2.5 monitor distribution and major highways, Denver, CO.
July 2009
A-105
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Site A
Site B
SiteC
Site D
Site E
Site F
SiteG
Site H
AGS Site ID
08-001-0008
08-005-0005
08-013-0003
08-013-0012
08-031-0002
08-031-0023
08-123-0008
08-123-0008
Mean
Obs
SD
40 -
30
cn
a.
c
o
M
£ 20
c
U
c
o
u
10
1=winter
2 -spring
3=summer ~
4=fail
A
B
C
D
E
F
6
11.6
12.9
13.8
13.9
13.5
13.7
14.0
356
308
342
308
303
350
1049
7.5
9.4
9.1
9.5
9.9
8.9
8.9
II §
1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234
Figure A-45. Box plots illustrating the seasonal distribution of 24-h avg PM2.5 concentrations for
Denver, CO.
Table A-4. Inter-sampler correlation statistics for each pair of PM2.5 monitors reporting to AQS for
Denver, CO.
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
A
1.00
0.74
0.84
0.68
0.86
0.91
0.76
0.83
(0.0,0.00)
(6.0,0.21)
(5.4,0.17)
(7.9,0.26)
(4.1,0.14)
(3.0,0.11)
(5.9,0.19)
(4.6,0.14)
369
353
347
332
362
339
341
325
B
1.00
0.58
0.76
0.92
0.84
0.50
0.49
(0.0,0.00)
(5.7,0.19)
(3.9,0.17)
(3.2,0.13)
(4.4,0.17)
(7.8,0.23)
(6.6,0.21)
363
344
328
356
336
337
323
C
1.00
0.74
0.71
0.75
0.83
0.88
(0.0,0.00)
(4.4,0.19)
(4.5,0.17)
(5.4,0.18)
(3.5,0.14)
(3.7,0.13)
361
326
354
336
333
320
D
1.00
0.82
0.77
0.54
0.57
(0.0,0.00)
(5.6,0.21)
(6.0,0.24)
(7.2,0.24)
(6.4,0.24)
354
347
332
318
305
E
1.00
0.94
0.64
0.60
(0.0,0.00)
(2.3,0.09)
(7.1,0.21)
(5.6,0.18)
R
1046
969
353
330
F
(P90, COD)
1.00
0.68
0.69
N
(0.0,0.00)
(6.6,0.21)
(5.9,0.17)
1006
333
317
G
1.00
0.88
(0.0,0.00)
(3.4,0.13)
359
313
H
1.00
July 2009
A-106
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
A E
) C
D E
F G
H
(0.0,0.00)
334
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Distance Between Samplers (km)
Figure A-46. PM2.5 inter-sampler correlations as a function of distance between monitors for Denver,
CO.
July 2009
A-107
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
q!\
r
0 10 20
40
60
80
100
~ Kilometers
Figure A-47. PM2.5 monitor distribution and major highways, Detroit, Ml.
• Detroit PM2.5 Monitors
Detroit Interstates
Detroit Major Highways
Detroit
July 2009
A-108
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Obs
SO
SO •
AGS Site ID
Site A 26-049-0021 Mean
SfeB 26-099-0009
SiteG 26-115-0005
SifeD 26-125-0001
Site F 26-147-0005
Site F 26-161-0008
SiteG 26-163-0001
40 •
c
o
Qj 20 •
c
o
A
11.6
356
7.5
B
C
D
E
F
G
12.9
13.8
13.9
13.5
13.7
14.0
306
342
308
303
350
1049
9.4
9.1
9,5
9.9
8.9
8.9
1=winter
2-spring
4=fall
1 2 3 4 1
2 3 4 12 3 4
12 3 4
12 3 4
12 3 4
12 3 4
AOS Site ID
H
I
J
K
L
M
Site H
26-163-0015
Mean
155
150
14 4
134
17.2
143
Sitel
26-163-0016
Obs
342
572
308
301
344
342
Site J
26-163-0019
SD
Site K
26-163-0025
94
10.5
99
92
10.1
8.8
Site L 26-163-0033
Site M 26-163-0036
40
30
ar
E
1
c
o
S 20
2
o
10
1=winter
2=spring
3=surnroer
4=fail 1 2 3 4 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234
Figure A-48. Box plots illustrating the seasonal distribution of 24-h avg PM2.5 concentrations for
Detroit, Ml.
July 2009
A-109
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table A-5. Inter-sampler correlation statistics for each pair of PM2.5 monitors reporting to AQS for
Detroit, Ml.
A B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
A
1.00 0.91
0.86
0.91
0.89
0.90
0.89
0.88
0.89
0.91
0.92
0.87
0.88
(0.0,0.00) (5.9,0.17)
(7.8,0.19)
(6.7,0.17)
(7.6,0.18)
(5.9,0.18)
(8.1,0.20)
(8.3,0.22)
(8.0,0.19)
(7.3,0.17)
(5.5,0.16)
(11.0,0.26)
(7.8,0.21)
356 299
333
301
296
341
349
334
284
301
293
336
333
B
1.00
0.90
0.94
0.92
0.92
0.93
0.90
0.92
0.91
0.92
0.89
0.91
(0.0,0.00)
(6.8,0.17)
(5.3,0.14)
(5.9,0.16)
(5.8,0.17)
(6.2,0.18)
(7.5,0.21)
(5.8,0.18)
(4.9,0.16)
(5.4,0.17)
(10.2,0.24)
(6.1,0.19)
306
286
296
290
294
300
288
277
297
286
292
288
C
1.00
0.90
0.87
0.91
0.93
0.90
0.91
0.90
0.89
0.87
0.93
(0.0,0.00)
(7.0,0.16)
(8.8,0.20)
(5.5,0.15)
(5.9,0.14)
(7.2,0.17)
(6.3,0.16)
(6.2,0.14)
(6.2,0.16)
(10.4,0.20)
(4.9,0.13)
342
289
284
326
335
320
273
286
279
321
319
D
1.00
0.93
0.94
0.96
0.92
0.94
0.94
0.94
0.91
0.92
(0.0,0.00)
(6.3,0.15)
(4.5,0.14)
(4.3,0.13)
(5.8,0.16)
(4.5,0.12)
(3.8,0.11)
(3.6,0.13)
(8.2,0.18)
(6.2,0.15)
308
292
296
303
291
281
297
291
290
290
E
1.00
0.90
0.90
0.89
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.87
0.87
(0.0,0.00)
(7.5,0.18)
(7.3,0.20)
(8.2,0.22)
(7.0,0.19)
(6.4,0.18)
(6.9,0.18)
(10.7,0.25)
(7.7,0.21)
303
291
297
286
276
292
284
288
288
F
1.00
0.95
0.90
0.92
0.92
0.95
0.89
0.93
(0.0,0.00)
(4.5,0.13)
(6.2,0.17)
(5.7,0.15)
(5.2,0.14)
(3.9,0.12)
(9.8,0.21)
(5.7,0.15)
350
343
326
280
297
288
329
326
G
1.00
0.94
0.95
0.92
0.93
0.90
0.95
(0.0,0.00)
(5.1,0.14)
(4.9,0.12)
(4.5,0.14)
(5.6,0.16)
(8.2,0.18)
(4.7,0.12)
1049
336
549
302
295
337
335
H
1.00
0.93
0.91
0.89
0.91
0.91
(0.0,0.00)
(4.8,0.15)
(5.4,0.15)
(6.9,0.18)
(7.6,0.16)
(6.1,0.15)
342
273
290
288
321
319
I
1.00
0.92
0.90
0.92
0.93
R
(0.0,0.00)
(4.4,0.13)
(6.1,0.14)
(7.9,0.18)
(5.8,0.14)
(P90, COD)
572
279
271
274
274
J
N
1.00
0.91
0.90
0.91
(0.0,0.00)
(5.3,0.15)
(8.1,0.17)
(5.6,0.13)
308
288
291
291
K
1.00
0.88
0.91
(0.0,0.00)
(9.5,0.21)
(6.3,0.16)
301
281
283
L
1.00
0.91
(0.0,0.00)
(8.5,0.17)
344
322
M
1.00
(0.0,0.00)
342
July 2009
A-110
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
0.6
o
o
0.4
0.2
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Distance Between Samplers (km)
Figure A-49. PM2.5 inter-sampler correlations as a function of distance between monitors for Detroit,
Ml.
July 2009
A-111
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
d\
r
• Houston PM2.5 Monitors
Houston Interstates
Houston Major Highways
Houston
0 10 20 40 60 80 100
i Kilometers
Figure A-50. PM2.5 monitor distribution and major highways, Houston, TX.
July 2009
A-112
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Site A
Site B
AQS Site ID
48-201-0058
48-201-1035
Mean
Obs
SD
40
30
£
cn
c
o
4-»
ro
4->
c
-------
Table A-6. Inter-sampler correlation statistics for each pair of PM2.5 monitors reporting to AQS for
Houston, TX.
A
B
A
1.00
0.66
(0.0,0.00)
(10.0,0.24)
326
310
B
1.00
(0.0,0.00)
1016
R
(P90, COD)
N
1
0.8
0.6
o
o
0.4
0.2
0 , , , , , , , , ,
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Distance Between Samplers (km)
Figure A-52. PM2.5 inter-sampler correlations as a function of distance between monitors for Houston,
TX.
July 2009
A-114
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
• New York PM2.5 Monitors
New York Interstates
New York Major Highways
New York
0 10 20 40 60 80 100
~ Kilometers
PM25 monitor distribution and major highways, New York City, NY.
A-115
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Site A
Site B
SiteC
Site D
Site E
Site F
Site G
SiteH
Site!
Site J
AQS Site ID
09-001-0010
09-001-1123
09-001-3005
09-001-9003
09-005-0005
09-009-0026
09-009-0027
09-009-1123
09-009-2008
09-009-2123
E
I
c
o
Mean
Obs
SD
50
40
A
13.2
349
8.7
B
12.5
339
8,3
C
12.3
332
8.1
D
11.2
585
7,6
E
8.0
341
6.8
F
121
341
8.0
G
12.4
992
8.1
H
12.8
338
8.5
i
11.1
344
7.5
J
12.8
352
8.2
30
t 20
Site K
Site L
SiteM
Site N
Site 0
SiteP
Site Q
SiteR
SiteS
Site T
c
at
u
c
o
u
1= winter
2=spring
3=summer
4—fall
AQS Site ID
34-003-0003
34-013-0015
34-017-1003
34-021-0008
34-021-8001
34-023-0008
34-027-0004
34-027-3001
34-029-2002
34-031-0005
10
12 3 4
12 3 4
12 3 4
12 3 4
12 3 4
12 3 4
12 3 4
12 3 4
12 3 4
1 2 3
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
Mean
13.2
133
13.7
12.3
108
12.1
11.3
10.0
10.8
12.9
Obs
345
334
559
545
313
336
336
357
550
330
SD
8.9
8.8
8.5
7.7
7,0
7.7
7.7
7.4
6.8
8,7
50
40
30
3
c
o
+-~
fT5
£ 20
c
m
u
c
o
u
10
l=winter
2-spring
3=summer
4—fall
i
III
¦
ill
1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234
July 2009
A-116
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
AQS Site ID
u
V
W
X
Y
Z
AA
AB
AC
AD
SiteV
34-039-0006
Mean
14.5
13.2
12.9
15.5
13.0
13.0
14.0
11.4
15.9
13.5
SiteW
34-039-2003
Obs
1017
352
332
349
359
1059
342
337
357
363
SiteX
36-005-0080
Site Y
36-005-0083
SO
8.7
8.4
8.4
S.1
8.2
8.2
8.4
7.5
8.9
8.4
SiteZ 38-005-0110 50
Site AA 36-047-0122
SifeAB 38-059-0008
Site AC 36-081-0056
Site AD 36-061-0079 40 -
ST
£
oi
3 30 -
1=winter
2=spring
3=summer 0 -j | | | | | | | |
4=fall 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234
SiteAE 36-081-0128
SiteAF 36-071-0002
Site AG 36-081-0124
Site AH 36-085-0055
Site Al 38-085-0067
Site A J 36-119-1002
AE
Mean 15 3
Chs 34;
60
50
40
30
ST
E
en
3
c
o
Z3
res
£ 20
u
c
o
w
10
1 =winter
2=spring
3=summer 0
4—fall
AF
10 B
342
76
AG
116
m
15
AH
113
337
8 0
Al
114
33b
AJ
11 7
355
7 a
12 3 4 12 3 4
234 1234 1234 1234
Figure A-54. Box plots illustrating the seasonal distribution of 24-h avg PM2.5 concentrations for New
York City, NY.
July 2009
A-117
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table A-7. Inter-sampler correlation statistics for each pair of PM2.5 monitors reporting to AQS for
New York City, NY.
Site
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
0
P
Q
R
A
1.00
0.89
0.97
0.97
0.82
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.93
0.91
0.91
0.92
0.88
0.84
0.87
0.89
0.84
(0.0,
0.00)
(5.3,
0.15)
(3.6,
0.09)
(4.8,
0.11)
111.8,
0.33)
(3.8,0.11)
(4.0,0.11)
(3.4,0.10)
(4.6,
0.12)
(5.1,0.12)
(5.8,0.12)
(5.7,0.12)
(5.5,0.13)
(6.6,0.16)
(9.1,
0.19)
(8.3,0.16)
(7.6,
0.16)
(9.3,
0.21)
349
322
316
322
325
328
321
324
326
335
329
316
331
301
296
321
318
316
B
1.00
0.93
0.91
0.78
0.91
0.92
0.91
0.91
0.92
0.83
0.84
0.85
0.82
0.79
0.82
0.82
0.78
(0.0,
0.00)
(4.5,
0.13)
(5.3,
0.14)
110.4,
0.32)
(4.7,0.13)
(4.6,0.13)
(4.6,0.14)
(5.0,
0.14)
(4.5,0.13)
(7.3,0.17)
(7.1,0.17)
(7.8,0.19)
(7.2,0.19)
(7.7,
0.20)
(7.6,0.18)
(6.6,
0.18)
(8.4,
0.22)
339
312
315
319
316
313
313
315
330
319
305
321
291
292
310
307
305
C
1.00
0.98
0.82
0.96
0.95
0.96
0.97
0.94
0.91
0.91
0.91
0.89
0.84
0.88
0.89
0.84
(0.0,
0.00)
(3.4,
0.08)
(10.8,
0.32)
(3.9,0.10)
(4.1,0.11)
(3.6,0.10)
(4.0,
0.11)
(4.8,0.11)
(5.7,0.13)
(5.8,0.14)
(6.5,0.15)
(5.4,0.15)
(6.9,
0.17)
(6.3,0.14)
(6.2,
0.15)
(8.2,
0.20)
332
314
309
310
308
307
310
319
314
299
316
287
289
307
305
297
D
1.00
0.85
0.96
0.96
0.94
0.96
0.92
0.90
0.89
0.91
0.88
0.87
0.89
0.90
0.86
(0.0,
0.00)
(8.4,0.29)
(3.4,0.11)
(3.8,0.11)
(5.0,0.13)
(3.0,
0.10)
(5.5,0.13)
(7.1,0.15)
(6.9,0.15)
(6.7,0.18)
(6.3,0.17)
(6.5,
0.16)
(6.0,0.15)
(5.5,
0.14)
(6.6,
0.18)
565
314
316
532
315
313
325
319
308
517
506
288
311
309
330
E
1.00
0.82
0.82
0.79
0.83
0.81
0.80
0.77
0.76
0.76
0.79
0.78
0.87
0.87
(0.0,0.00)
(10.0,
0.31)
(10.7,
0.33)
(11.4,
0.33)
(8.8,
0.28)
(10.3,
0.32)
(12.5,
0.34)
(13.0,
0.34)
(13.8,
0.39)
(11.6,
0.35)
(9.1,
0.30)
(10.4,
0.32)
(7.9,
0.28)
(7.3,
0.24)
341
321
313
317
319
330
322
305
323
294
291
316
311
305
F
1.00
0.99
0.98
0.98
0.94
0.88
0.89
0.89
0.86
0.85
0.88
0.87
0.83
(0.0,0.00)
(2.1,0.07)
(2.9,0.09)
(2.8,
0.09)
(4.7,0.11)
(6.7,0.14)
(6.8,0.15)
(6.8,0.16)
(6.4,0.17)
(6.8,
0.18)
(6.1,0.15)
(7.3,
0.16)
(7.5,
0.21)
341
314
319
321
328
321
308
323
293
295
312
310
308
G
1.00
0.96
0.98
0.93
0.88
0.89
0.89
0.84
0.84
0.86
0.87
0.82
(0.0,0.00)
(2.9,0.10)
(3.6,
0.11)
(5.2,0.12)
(7.1,0.15)
(6.7,0.15)
(6.9,0.16)
(6.9,0.18)
(8.0,
0.19)
(7.6,0.16)
(8.1,
0.17)
(8.4,
0.23)
992
315
319
326
319
309
526
513
286
310
306
327
H
1.00
0.98
0.94
0.88
0.89
0.89
0.84
0.82
0.85
0.85
0.79
(0.0,0.00)
(3.7,
0.10)
(3.7,0.10)
(7.1,0.14)
(7.1,0.14)
(6.6,0.16)
(6.7,0.18)
(8.1,
0.20)
(7.8,0.17)
(7.5,
0.17)
(9.2,
0.23)
338
320
324
318
303
321
292
285
310
307
304
I
1.00
0.95
0.89
0.90
0.89
0.87
0.85
0.87
0.88
0.83
(0.0,
0.00)
(4.1,0.11)
(7.0,0.16)
(7.0,0.16)
(7.7,0.20)
(6.4,0.18)
(6.6,
0.17)
(6.5,0.16)
(6.5,
0.15)
(7.6,
0.19)
344
327
324
307
323
296
291
313
313
310
J
1.00
0.87
0.87
0.87
0.84
0.79
0.82
0.84
0.79
(0.0,0.00)
(7.0,0.16)
(7.2,0.16)
(8.5,0.17)
(6.9,0.18)
(7.9,
0.20)
(8.1,0.18)
(7.5,
0.17)
(9.0,
0.22)
352
332
316
334
303
299
321
322
316
K
1.00
0.95
0.93
0.88
0.86
0.90
0.92
0.86
R
IP90,
(0.0,0.00)
(3.4,0.09)
(4.5,0.12)
(6.4,0.15)
(7.5,
0.17)
(5.7,0.13)
(5.8,
0.14)
(8.7,
0.20)
COD)
345
314
330
301
296
317
319
312
L
N
1.00
0.97
0.91
0.86
0.94
0.93
0.87
(0.0,0.00)
(4.1,0.10)
(6.4,0.14)
(8.0,
0.18)
(5.2,0.12)
(5.9,
0.13)
(8.3,
0.20)
334
321
289
288
309
303
301
M
1.00
0.91
0.86
0.93
0.92
0.85
(0.0,0.00)
(5.5,0.14)
(8.4,
0.21)
(6.7,0.15)
(7.5,
0.18)
(9.7,
0.25)
559
499
300
326
318
337
N
1.00
0.93
0.95
0.91
0.88
(0.0,0.00)
(4.7,
0.14)
(4.1,0.11)
(5.8,
0.15)
(7.2,
0.20)
545
270
293
292
316
0
1.00
0.93
0.91
0.94
(0.0,
0.00)
(4.3,0.12)
(4.9,
0.14)
(4.3,
0.14)
313
294
287
279
P
1.00
0.94
0.91
(0.0,0.00)
(4.9,
0.12)
(5.5,
0.16)
336
308
303
Q
1.00
0.95
(0.0,
0.00)
(3.8,
0.13)
336
307
R 1.00
(0.0,
0.00)
357
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
AA
AB
AC
AD
AE
AF
AG
AH
Al
AJ
A 0.75
0.89
0.90
0.90
0.88
0.92
0.94
0.93
0.93
0.88
0.89
0.94
0.88
0.89
0.93
0.90
0.89
0.96
(10.4,
(6.1,
(7.1,
(6.0,
(7.2,
(7.2,
(4.0,
(4.7,
(5.5,
(7.6,
(7.3,
(4.4,
(7.2,
(6.7,
(5.1,
(6.2,
(7.5,
(4.4,
0.21)
0.13)
0.15)
0.13)
0.15)
0.16)
0.11)
0.12)
0.13)
0.18)
0.18)
0.11)
0.19)
0.16)
0.12)
0.15)
0.16)
0.12)
323
315
337
299
316
332
342
348
325
320
340
346
326
323
299
317
318
338
B 0.68
0.84
0.83
0.83
0.84
0.84
0.88
0.85
0.84
0.81
0.81
0.86
0.81
0.92
0.84
0.87
0.86
0.88
July 2009
A-118
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
S T U V W X V Z AA AB AC AD AE AF AG AH Al AJ
(10.8,
(5.9,
(8.6,
(6.5,
(6.8,
(9.0,
(5.9,
(6.8,
(7.3,
(7.9,
(8.4,
(7.0,
(8.8,
(5.8,
(6.6,
(6.8,
17.1,
(5.5,
0.23)
0.16)
0.20)
0.18)
0.18)
0.21)
0.16)
0.17)
0.18)
0.20)
0.22)
0.17)
0.23)
0.16)
0.17)
0.18)
0.18)
0.15)
314
307
328
290
305
325
334
338
317
313
331
336
315
316
292
311
309
329
c
0.76
0.89
0.88
0.89
0.89
0.92
0.95
0.93
0.92
0.89
0.88
0.93
0.88
0.89
0.93
0.91
0.89
0.96
(8.5,
16.1,
(7.8,
(6.4,
(6.0,
(7.8,
(4.4,
(5.4,
(5.6,
16.1,
(7.5,
(5.3,
(7.4,
(6.7,
(4.7,
(5.7,
(6.0,
(3.5,
0.20)
0.14)
0.18)
0.15)
0.15)
0.18)
0.11)
0.13)
0.15)
0.16)
0.20)
0.12)
0.20)
0.15)
0.11)
0.14)
0.15)
0.10)
307
304
321
283
297
317
326
331
311
306
325
330
308
312
282
305
302
322
D
0.80
0.88
0.88
0.87
0.88
0.89
0.94
0.92
0.91
0.89
0.87
0.92
0.85
0.90
0.92
0.90
0.91
0.96
(7.7,
(7.3,
18.1,
17.1,
(6.9,
(9.7,
(5.6,
(6.2,
(7.0,
(5.9,
(9.6,
(6.6,
(9.2,
(5.4,
(4.8,
(6.5,
(5.3,
(3.7,
0.19)
0.16)
0.20)
0.17)
0.17)
0.21)
0.14)
0.15)
0.17)
0.16)
0.23)
0.15)
0.23)
0.14)
0.12)
0.16)
0.14)
0.10)
509
306
537
326
304
324
332
548
315
313
330
336
315
313
496
308
310
328
E
0.67
0.79
0.74
0.76
0.75
0.75
0.80
0.78
0.76
0.73
0.74
0.79
0.70
0.88
0.77
0.75
0.80
0.84
(9.8,
111.3,
114.9,
111.7,
112.1,
115.2,
111.5,
113.1,
(13.9,
110.1,
115.7,
113.1,
(15.0,
(7.6,
111.3,
112.5,
(9.4,
(9.8,
0.32)
0.34)
0.40)
0.36)
0.36)
0.41)
0.34)
0.36)
0.38)
0.33)
0.43)
0.35)
0.42)
0.26)
0.32)
0.36)
0.31)
0.29)
315
306
329
290
307
324
334
340
319
314
332
338
316
316
294
310
309
331
F
0.79
0.87
0.86
0.86
0.87
0.89
0.93
0.91
0.90
0.90
0.87
0.91
0.86
0.89
0.93
0.89
0.89
0.94
(7.9,
(6.7,
(8.5,
(6.8,
(6.6,
(8.2,
(5.0,
(6.4,
(6.7,
(5.6,
(8.4,
(6.3,
(8.0,
(6.4,
(4.6,
(5.7,
(5.3,
14.1,
0.19)
0.15)
0.19)
0.16)
0.16)
0.19)
0.12)
0.14)
0.15)
0.16)
0.20)
0.14)
0.21)
0.16)
0.12)
0.15)
0.15)
0.12)
316
306
329
293
309
325
335
340
320
317
334
339
319
317
290
312
310
332
G
0.77
0.87
0.87
0.86
0.88
0.89
0.92
0.90
0.90
0.88
0.86
0.91
0.85
0.88
0.90
0.89
0.88
0.93
(8.7,
(6.3,
(7.8,
(7.0,
(6.3,
(8.3,
(5.4,
(5.7,
17.1,
(7.5,
18.1,
(6.4,
(8.2,
(6.7,
(5.2,
16.1,
16.1,
(5.0,
0.21)
0.15)
0.18)
0.16)
0.15)
0.17)
0.13)
0.14)
0.15)
0.17)
0.19)
0.14)
0.20)
0.17)
0.13)
0.15)
0.16)
0.14)
513
304
928
327
303
319
329
958
315
308
327
333
314
311
856
312
309
325
H
0.74
0.86
0.86
0.87
0.87
0.90
0.92
0.89
0.90
0.88
0.87
0.91
0.86
0.88
0.90
0.88
0.86
0.93
(9.6,
(6.6,
(8.4,
17.1,
(6.9,
(7.5,
(5.2,
(5.6,
(6.4,
(7.3,
(7.9,
(5.7,
(7.3,
(6.9,
(5.6,
(6.8,
(6.4,
(5.0,
0.22)
0.15)
0.18)
0.16)
0.16)
0.17)
0.13)
0.14)
0.15)
0.19)
0.19)
0.13)
0.20)
0.17)
0.14)
0.16)
0.17)
0.13)
314
304
326
289
306
322
331
337
315
310
329
335
313
313
290
308
308
327
I
0.76
0.88
0.87
0.88
0.88
0.90
0.93
0.92
0.91
0.87
0.87
0.92
0.86
0.90
0.93
0.89
0.89
0.94
18.1,
17.1,
(8.7,
(7.4,
(6.9,
(9.4,
(5.7,
(6.5,
(7.2,
(6.2,
(9.6,
(6.3,
(9.2,
(5.5,
15.1,
(6.7,
(5.8,
14.1,
0.20)
0.17)
0.21)
0.17)
0.17)
0.22)
0.15)
0.16)
0.18)
0.17)
0.24)
0.16)
0.24)
0.13)
0.14)
0.18)
0.16)
0.12)
315
308
332
293
309
326
334
343
323
313
332
338
318
319
296
310
311
330
J
0.67
0.84
0.85
0.86
0.86
0.88
0.90
0.88
0.86
0.81
0.85
0.89
0.84
0.90
0.88
0.87
0.84
0.91
(11.1,
(6.6,
(9.0,
(6.7,
(6.8,
(8.8,
(6.1,
[7.1,
[7.3,
(8.2,
(9.0,
(6.9,
(8.9,
(6.4,
(6.4,
[7.5,
[7.7,
(5.6,
0.22)
0.16)
0.19)
0.16)
0.17)
0.19)
0.14)
0.16)
0.17)
0.19)
0.21)
0.15)
0.22)
0.16)
0.15)
0.16)
0.18)
0.14)
327
316
343
301
318
337
345
351
330
324
343
349
327
329
301
321
320
341
K
0.74
0.94
0.92
0.95
0.92
0.92
0.93
0.92
0.93
0.84
0.90
0.93
0.88
0.89
0.90
0.91
0.89
0.92
(10.9,
(3.9,
(5.7,
(3.4,
(4.3,
(6.0,
(3.8,
(4.2,
(4.3,
(8.5,
(6.2,
(3.8,
(6.2,
(7.4,
(5.9,
(5.0,
(6.5,
(4.8,
0.21)
0.11)
0.14)
0.10)
0.12)
0.15)
0.12)
0.12)
0.12)
0.19)
0.17)
0.11)
0.18)
0.17)
0.13)
0.13)
0.15)
0.13)
320
317
336
302
317
330
339
344
324
318
338
343
321
321
294
318
314
335
L
0.78
0.94
0.97
0.98
0.95
0.94
0.93
0.94
0.95
0.86
0.91
0.95
0.91
0.89
0.92
0.96
0.92
0.92
(9.8,
(3.9,
(4.5,
(2.9,
(4.0,
(6.3,
(4.5,
(4.2,
14.1,
18.1,
(6.3,
(4.2,
(5.9,
(6.8,
(5.4,
(4.0,
(6.4,
(5.4,
0.20)
0.11)
0.12)
0.08)
0.10)
0.15)
0.12)
0.11)
0.11)
0.18)
0.17)
0.10)
0.17)
0.17)
0.12)
0.11)
0.14)
0.13)
313
303
325
292
303
314
323
333
306
305
322
327
309
306
283
305
299
319
M
0.80
0.93
0.97
0.97
0.96
0.95
0.95
0.96
0.97
0.88
0.94
0.96
0.93
0.88
0.95
0.96
0.93
0.93
(9.9,
(5.4,
(3.8,
(3.5,
(4.7,
(4.9,
(4.7,
(3.5,
(3.4,
(8.3,
(4.5,
(3.5,
(4.5,
(8.5,
(5.0,
(4.3,
(6.8,
(5.7,
0.22)
0.13)
0.09)
0.09)
0.11)
0.11)
0.12)
0.10)
0.09)
0.20)
0.12)
0.10)
0.13)
0.21)
0.14)
0.10)
0.16)
0.17)
504
318
534
341
319
331
342
545
326
320
339
345
326
323
484
319
318
338
N
0.88
0.86
0.90
0.91
0.91
0.86
0.90
0.89
0.91
0.89
0.85
0.90
0.85
0.85
0.91
0.92
0.92
0.90
(6.4,
(6.5,
(6.5,
(5.7,
(4.5,
(8.2,
(5.9,
(5.4,
(5.3,
(5.6,
18.1,
(5.3,
(7.7,
(7.5,
(4.9,
(4.6,
(5.3,
(5.4,
0.17)
0.16)
0.15)
0.13)
0.13)
0.18)
0.14)
0.15)
0.14)
0.17)
0.18)
0.14)
0.18)
0.20)
0.14)
0.13)
0.14)
0.16)
492
287
519
313
290
301
309
529
297
289
308
313
294
292
477
292
293
306
0
0.87
0.82
0.86
0.87
0.88
0.84
0.87
0.86
0.88
0.89
0.82
0.88
0.81
0.84
0.88
0.89
0.92
0.88
(5.6,
(7.2,
(9.9,
(7.3,
(6.4,
111.1,
(6.7,
(8.6,
(8.2,
(5.2,
(10.3,
(8.4,
(10.6,
(7.0,
16.1,
16.1,
(4.7,
(5.4,
0.16)
0.18)
0.22)
0.18)
0.16)
0.24)
0.18)
0.19)
0.20)
0.15)
0.25)
0.18)
0.25)
0.18)
0.16)
0.18)
0.14)
0.16)
295
289
302
280
284
299
308
312
292
295
307
311
290
290
269
290
283
304
P
0.86
0.89
0.92
0.94
0.95
0.88
0.90
0.89
0.92
0.89
0.87
0.91
0.87
0.87
0.91
0.94
0.95
0.91
(6.2,
(6.2,
(7.4,
(5.0,
(4.0,
(8.9,
(5.9,
(6.8,
(6.4,
(5.3,
(8.9,
(6.4,
(8.3,
(6.7,
(5.5,
(4.7,
(3.5,
(5.0,
0.15)
0.14)
0.17)
0.12)
0.11)
0.19)
0.14)
0.15)
0.14)
0.14)
0.21)
0.14)
0.20)
0.16)
0.13)
0.12)
0.10)
0.14)
312
307
325
296
305
319
329
335
312
309
327
333
313
311
285
307
306
326
Q
0.79
0.92
0.91
0.93
0.92
0.89
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.83
0.90
0.91
0.87
0.91
0.89
0.90
0.91
0.92
18.1,
(5.0,
(8.2,
(6.2,
(5.4,
(9.7,
(6.3,
(7.3,
(7.3,
(6.9,
(9.9,
(6.9,
(9.5,
(4.8,
(6.0,
(6.3,
(5.3,
(5.5,
0.19)
0.14)
0.20)
0.14)
0.15)
0.22)
0.16)
0.17)
0.18)
0.19)
0.24)
0.16)
0.24)
0.14)
0.15)
0.17)
0.14)
0.13)
313
303
327
287
304
321
328
335
314
306
329
332
311
312
287
303
302
324
R
0.82
0.86
0.84
0.85
0.87
0.82
0.87
0.84
0.86
0.83
0.81
0.86
0.78
0.88
0.86
0.87
0.90
0.88
(6.5,
(7.6,
(10.9,
(8.2,
(7.0,
111.6,
(8.6,
(10.0,
19.1,
(7.0,
111.2,
(9.5,
111.0,
(6.2,
(7.6,
(7.8,
(5.7,
(6.3,
0.20)
0.21)
0.26)
0.21)
0.20)
0.28)
0.21)
0.23)
0.24)
0.21)
0.30)
0.22)
0.30)
0.17)
0.20)
0.22)
0.17)
0.17)
330
296
347
291
304
314
323
355
309
301
324
327
309
308
304
298
302
320
S
1.00
0.69
0.77
0.75
0.78
0.72
0.78
0.79
0.82
0.88
0.74
0.78
0.73
0.69
0.85
0.82
0.88
0.79
(0.0,
110.4,
(10.5,
(10.5,
(9.2,
112.5,
(8.6,
(9.3,
(9.4,
(5.0,
111.6,
(9.9,
111.5,
(10.3,
(7.2,
(8.5,
(5.5,
18.1,
0.00)
0.22)
0.24)
0.21)
0.19)
0.25)
0.19)
0.21)
0.20)
0.16)
0.26)
0.20)
0.25)
0.22)
0.17)
0.18)
0.14)
0.19)
550
306
525
324
306
325
336
536
319
314
333
339
322
316
478
310
312
331
T
1.00
0.92
0.93
0.93
0.92
0.91
0.91
0.90
0.80
0.87
0.93
0.85
0.89
0.88
0.90
0.86
0.91
(0.0,
(6.0,
(4.5,
(4.8,
(6.7,
(5.2,
(4.9,
(5.6,
(8.4,
(6.9,
(4.9,
(7.2,
(6.3,
(6.2,
(5.8,
(7.3,
(5.9,
0.00)
0.15)
0.12)
0.13)
0.16)
0.14)
0.13)
0.14)
0.20)
0.18)
0.12)
0.20)
0.17)
0.14)
0.14)
0.17)
0.14)
330
319
293
301
313
323
329
308
303
321
327
306
308
281
306
298
319
U
1.00
0.98
0.97
0.92
0.91
0.93
0.94
0.84
0.91
0.94
0.90
0.86
0.90
0.96
0.91
0.90
(0.0,
(3.9,
(5.0,
(5.4,
(6.9,
[5.2,
(4.9,
(9.9,
(5.0,
[5.2,
(5.9,
(9.6,
(6.9,
(5.8,
(8.4,
[7.5,
0.00)
0.10)
0.12)
0.12)
0.15)
0.13)
0.12)
0.22)
0.12)
0.12)
0.14)
0.23)
0.17)
0.12)
0.18)
0.19)
1017
341
325
337
347
987
332
326
346
351
330
330
878
325
323
343
V
1.00
0.97
0.93
0.92
0.92
0.94
0.83
0.90
0.94
0.91
0.88
0.89
0.96
0.91
0.91
(0.0,
(2.8,
16.1,
(5.0,
(4.4,
(4.2,
(8.2,
(6.6,
(4.3,
16.1,
(7.0,
(5.8,
(4.0,
(6.4,
(5.3,
0.00)
0.09)
0.14)
0.13)
0.12)
0.12)
0.19)
0.16)
0.11)
0.16)
0.18)
0.15)
0.10)
0.15)
0.15)
352
288
300
307
351
294
290
305
311
294
290
301
291
287
304
W
1.00
0.90
0.91
0.91
0.92
0.85
0.89
0.93
0.88
0.87
0.89
0.96
0.92
0.90
July 2009
A-119
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
S T U V W
X
Y
Z
AA
AB
AC
AD
AE
AF
AG
AH
Al
AJ
(0.0,
0.00)
(7.0,
0.16)
(5.5,
0.13)
(5.3,
0.13)
(4.8,
0.13)
(7.0,
0.18)
(6.8,
0.17)
(5.0,
0.12)
(6.9,
0.18)
(6.8,
0.18)
(5.1,
0.14)
[3.7,
0.10)
(4.9,
0.13)
(5.0,
0.15)
332
316
325
331
310
309
323
328
308
310
281
304
303
320
X
1.00
0.96
0.97
0.95
0.86
0.94
0.97
0.93
0.88
0.93
0.92
0.88
0.93
(0.0,
0.00)
(5.8,
0.13)
(4.4,
0.11)
(5.0,
0.11)
(10.0,
0.23)
(3.3,
0.09)
(4.5,
0.11)
14.1,
0.11)
(9.8,
0.24)
(6.9,
0.17)
(6.5,
0.14)
(9.2,
0.20)
(8.2,
0.19)
349
344
349
328
324
342
348
326
326
301
319
319
340
Y
1.00
0.97
0.96
0.90
0.93
0.98
0.93
0.89
0.97
0.93
0.92
0.97
(0.0,
0.00)
(3.2,
0.08)
(3.9,
0.09)
(6.5,
0.16)
(5.4,
0.15)
(2.8,
0.08)
(5.4,
0.15)
(6.5,
0.18)
(3.3,
0.09)
(4.9,
0.12)
(5.3,
0.13)
(3.5,
0.11)
359
359
338
333
352
358
337
335
308
328
329
350
Z
1.00
0.97
0.90
0.94
0.98
0.92
0.88
0.95
0.93
0.91
0.95
(0.0,
0.00)
(2.9,
0.09)
(7.2,
0.17)
(4.4,
0.13)
11.8,
0.07)
(4.6,
0.14)
(7.8,
0.19)
(4.0,
0.10)
(4.7,
0.11)
16.1,
0.14)
(4.9,
0.14)
1059
342
337
357
363
341
342
919
337
335
355
AA
1.00
0.92
0.94
0.98
0.93
0.87
0.97
0.95
0.94
0.95
(0.0,
0.00)
17.1,
0.18)
(3.8,
0.11)
(2.9,
0.07)
14.1,
0.11)
18.1,
0.20)
(4.0,
0.11)
(4.3,
0.10)
(6.6,
0.15)
15.1,
0.15)
342
317
336
341
319
319
292
313
312
335
AB
1.00
0.85
0.89
0.86
0.79
0.95
0.90
0.93
0.90
(0.0,
0.00)
(9.2,
0.24)
(7.2,
0.17)
(9.0,
0.23)
18.1,
0.20)
14.1,
0.13)
16.1,
0.16)
(3.8,
0.12)
(5.5,
0.16)
337
330
337
316
313
291
310
310
329
AC
1.00
0.95
0.98
0.84
0.96
0.91
0.89
0.91
(0.0,
0.00)
(4.4,
0.13)
(3.0,
0.08)
110.4,
0.26)
(6.6,
0.18)
(6.6,
0.15)
(9.3,
0.21)
(7.4,
0.22)
357
356
334
336
304
326
326
348
AD
1.00
0.93
0.89
0.97
0.95
0.93
0.96
(0.0,
0.00)
(4.6,
0.14)
17.1,
0.18)
(4.0,
0.10)
(4.4,
0.10)
(6.0,
0.13)
(4.6,
0.13)
363
341
339
311
333
333
354
AE
1.00
0.82
0.94
0.92
0.89
0.89
(0.0,
0.00)
(10.0,
0.26)
(6.2,
0.18)
(5.6,
0.15)
(8.4,
0.20)
(8.0,
0.22)
341
319
290
313
314
332
AF
1.00
0.86
0.87
0.87
0.91
(0.0,
0.00)
(7.0,
0.16)
17.1,
0.18)
(6.4,
0.16)
(5.5,
0.14)
342
289
310
313
331
AG
1.00
0.93
0.94
0.96
(0.0,
0.00)
(4.8,
0.12)
(4.5,
0.11)
(3.7,
0.11)
951
289
283
304
AH
1.00
0.97
0.92
(0.0,
0.00)
14.1,
0.10)
(4.9,
0.15)
337
307
327
_A| 1.00 0.92
(0.0, (4.8,
0.00) 0.14)
335 324
AJ L00_
(0.0,
om_
355
July 2009
A-120
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
~ s^/i 7yGv"<:/V* ~~~~ Ct* ^
~ * . ~ ~~ *~ ~ * ~.~~ ~
~~* ~ .*
~
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Distance Between Samplers (km)
Figure A-55 PM2.5 inter-sampler correlations as a function of distance between monitors for New
York City, NY.
July 2009
A-121
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
0/
r
• Philadelphia PM2.5 Monitors
Philadelphia Interstates
Philadelphia Major Highways
Philadelphia
0 10 20 40 60 80
100
~ Kilometers
Figure A-56. PM2,5 monitor distribution and major highways, Philadelphia, PA.
July 2009
A-122
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
AOS Site ID A
Site A 10-003-1003 yearl 134
Site B 10-003-1007 0bs
SiteC 10-003-1012
SiteD 10-003-2004 11
Site E 24-015-0003 60 '
Site F 34-007-0003
Site G 34-007-1007
Site H 42-017-0012
40 •
ST*
S
30
S 20
c
o
10
1=winter
2=spring
3=summer
4~fali
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
12,8
13.5
14.7
12.5
13,5
13.5
13.2
346
331
999
348
539
340
317
7.4
7.7
8.3
7.4
8.0
8,5
8.2
1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234
Site!
Site J
Site K
Site L
Site M
Site N
SitoO
AOS Site ID
42-029-0100
42-045-0002
42-091-0013
42-101-0004
42-101-0024
42-101-0047
42-101-0138
sr
E
Mean 14.2
Obs 277
5° 8,3
50 '
40
— 30
c
o
c
*
u
c
o
u
20 -
10
1=winter
2=spring
3=summer
4=falt
J
K
L
M
N
O
150
12.6
13.8
12,8
14.9
13.4
331
307
890
805
596
780
8,1
7,7
8,4
80
8,3
77
1234 12 3 4 1234 1234 12 3 4 1234 12 3 4
Figure A-57. Box plots illustrating the seasonal distribution of 24-h avg PM2.5 concentrations for
Philadelphia, PA.
July 2009
A-123
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table A-8. Inter-sampler correlation statistics for each pair of PM2.5 monitors reporting to AQS for
Philadelphia, PA.
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNO
A 1.00 034 056 038 052 056 053 059 035 052 056 096 096 095 0.97
(0.0,0.00) (4.7,0.12) (3.1,0.08) (3.2,0.08) (4.8,0.12) (3.5,0.10) (4.2,0.11) 15.3,0.13) (4.2,0.12) (4.6,0.14) (4.7,0.15) (3.5,0.08) (3.7,0.10) (4.5,0.12) (3.2,0.08)
335 305 282 318 311 312 308 289 247 298 277 283 243 236 236
_B UN) 055 053 054 092 088 083 050 057 051 051 052 058 0.89
(0.0,0.00) (4.3,0.12) (6.4,0.15) (3.4,0.11) (5.2,0.14) (6.0,0.15) (6.8,0.17) (6.7,0.17) (6.5,0.18) (5.9,0.18) (6.5,0.14) (5.0,0.14) (7.3,0.17) (5.9,0.13)
346 288 329 318 313 31_5 293 253 302 285 293 253 238 246
_C 150 056 055 054 058 058 053 058 054 053 053 051 0.93
(0.0,050) (4.3,0.09) (3.5,0.11) (4.7,0.12) (5.3,0.14) (6.0,0.14) (3.5,0.12) (6.6,0.16) (5.5,0.17) (5.0,0.12) (4.8,0.13) (6.0,0.14) (4.6,0.11)
331 312 289 292 286 270 242 278 261 281 245 225 237
_D 150 051 054 052 058 054 050 055 055 053 053 0.95
(0.0,050) (6.5,0.15) (4.9,0.12) (5.0,0.14) (6.3,0.15) (4.1,0.12) (5.3,0.14) (5.8,0.18) (4.3,0.11) (5.6,0.14) (4.2,0.10) (4.5,0.11)
999 325 490 31_7 297 257 312 287 801 732 540 704
J 150 051 057 053 050 056 056 058 050 057 0.89
(0.0,050) (5.6,0.14) (6.1,0.15) (6.7,0.16) (6.6,0.16) (7.1,0.19) (5.7,0.15) (6.8,0.15) (5.3,0.13) (7.0,0.18) (5.7,0.13)
348 320 321 301 255 310 287 296 255 242 254
_F 150 055 050 052 059 057 056 056 055 0.96
(05,0.00) (3.4,0.09) (5.3,0.13) (5.4,0.14) (5.9,0.16) (4.4,0.15) (3.7,0.10) (3.6,0.10) (4.5,0.13) (3.4,0.09)
539 31_7 296 261 309 284 466 437 £4 396
_G 150 050 050 057 055 053 057 052 0.96
(0.0,050) (4.8,0.14) (5.9,0.16) (6.2,0.17) (4.7,0.16) (3.7,0.09) (3.1,0.09) (5.7,0.13) (3.5,0.08)
340 295 258 305 289 288 251 235 240
_H 150 054 053 059 050 054 057 0.89
(05,0.00) (5.7,0.16) (8.0,0.19) (4.4,0.13) (5.0,0.13) (4.0,0.12) (5.9,0.17) (4.8,0.13)
31_7 240 288 275 273 234 21_5 227
J 150 057 051 051 052 050 0.92
(05,0.00) (5.5,0.17) (5.7,0.17) (4.9,0.14) (5.4,0.15) (5.2,0.16) (5.1,0.14)
R 277 248 228 235 215 196 195
J (P90, COD) 150 079 059 059 059 0.91
N (0.0,050) (7.4,0.21) (5.8,0.15) (6.4,0.17) (5.7,0.13) (5.0,0.14)
331 278 282 246 237 231
_K 150 057 055 054 0.86
(05,0.00) (4.7,0.15) (3.7,0.13) (6.8,0.20) (4.3,0.13)
307 268 230 211 212
_L 150 058 055 0.97
(0.0,050) (3.1,0.09) (3.7,0.11) (3.4,0.07)
890 672 512 630
M LOO 055 0.96
(0.0,050) (4.7,0.14) (3.2,0.09)
805 495 563
J LOO 0.97
(0.0,050) (3.5,0.10)
596 447
_0 1.00
(0.0,050)
780
July 2009
A-124
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
• *%#*»•~~~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
% ~ ~ ~~ A t
\ ~ ~ f ~
~ ~
* ^ ~~
~
~ %
0.6
o
o
0.4
0.2
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Distance Between Samplers (km)
Figure A-58. PM2.5 inter-sampler correlations as a function of distance between monitors for
Philadelphia, PA.
July 2009
A-125
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Q)
• Phoenix PM2.5 Monitors
Phoenix Interstates
Phoenix Major Highways
Phoenix
0 10 20 40 60 80 100
~ Kilometers
Figure A-59. PM2,5 monitor distribution and major highways. Phoenix, AZ.
July 2009
A-126
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
AGS Site ID
Site A 04-013-0019'
Site B 04-013-4003
SiteC 04-013-9997
Site D 04-021-0001
Site E 04-021-3002
Mean
Obs
SD
50
40
E
cn
c
o
+¦»
to
0>
u
c
o
u
30
20
10
1=winter
2 spring
3 summer q
4=fall
A
12.3
370
7,8
B
12.6
352
7.3
C
9.8
360
5.5
D
8.9
227
4.4
E
5.9
325
2.8
1234 1234 1234 1234 1234
Figure A-60. Box plots illustrating the seasonal distribution of 24-h avg PM2.5 concentrations for
Phoenix, AZ.
Table A-9. Inter-sampler correlation statistics for each pair of PM2.5 monitors reporting to AQS for
Phoenix, AZ.
A
B
C
D
E
A
1.00
0.87
0.92
0.50
0.12
(0.0,0.00)
(6.4,0.15)
(6.5,0.16)
(10.4,0.25)
(14.4,0.40)
370
345
355
222
321
B
1.00
0.89
0.54
0.23
(0.0,0.00)
(6.8,0.17)
(9.6,0.25)
(13.2,0.40)
352
338
212
307
C
1.00
0.54
0.18
(0.0,0.00)
(7.2,0.20)
(9.3,0.33)
July 2009
A-127
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
A
B C
D
E
360
216
315
D
1.00
0.51
(0.0,0.00) (7.8,0.27)
227 200
1.00
(0.0,0.00)
40 50 60
Distance Between Samplers (km)
100
Figure A-61. PM2.5 inter-sampler correlations as a function of distance between monitors for Phoenix,
AZ.
July 2009
A-128
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
q!\
*
• Riverside PM2.5 Monitors
Riverside Interstates
Riverside Major Highways
Riverside
0 1020 40 60 80 100
^¦=1 Kilometers
Figure A-62. PM2,5 monitor distribution and major highways. Riverside, CA.
July 2009
A-129
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Site A
Site B
SiteC
Site D
Site E
Site F
SiteG
AQS Site ID
06-065-1003
06-065-2002
06-065-8001
06-071-0025
06-071-0306
06-071-2002
06-071-9004
cn
c
o
ro
c
(U
u
c
o
u
A
Mean 17.7
Obs 314
SD 11.6
70 r_
60
50
40
30
20
10
1--winter
2=spring
3=summer g
4—fall
B
9.9
310
4.9
C
19.7
934
12.7
D
18.4
319
10.9
E
9.9
236
4.4
F
18.4
328
11.9
I
f
G
17.7
310
12.2
1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234
Figure A-63. Box plots illustrating the seasonal distribution of 24-h avg PM2.5 concentrations for
Riverside, CA.
July 2009
A-130
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table A-10. Inter-sampler correlation statistics for each pair of PM2.5 monitors reporting to AQS for
Riverside, CA.
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
A
1.00
0.45
0.96
0.92
0.36
0.94
0.90
(0.0,0.00)
(20.6,0.32)
(5.0,0.10)
(7.2,0.13)
(22.1,0.35)
(6.0,0.12)
(5.7,0.13)
314
269
297
282
191
281
273
B
1.00
0.49
0.49
0.42
0.49
0.50
(0.0,0.00)
(22.7,0.35)
(20.9,0.34)
(8.2,0.25)
(19.7,0.33)
(18.8,0.31)
310
289
270
203
285
266
C
1.00
0.91
0.37
0.92
0.91
(0.0,0.00)
(8.2,0.14)
(26.6,0.37)
(6.9,0.12)
(7.6,0.12)
934
300
227
302
287
D
1.00
0.36
0.93
0.82
(0.0,0.00)
(20.1,0.35)
(6.7,0.14)
(9.6,0.17)
319
195
289
274
E
R
1.00
0.40
0.41
(P90, COD)
(0.0,0.00)
(21.1,0.36)
(21.6,0.34)
N
236
201
190
F
1.00
0.90
(0.0,0.00)
(6.7,0.12)
328
276
G
1.00
(0.0,0.00)
310
~ ~
~
~ ««
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Distance Between Samplers (km)
Figure A-64. PM2.5 inter-sampler correlations as a function of distance between monitors for
Riverside CA.
July 2009
A-131
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Q)
r
• Seattle PM2.5 Monitors
Seattle Interstates
Seattle Major Highways
Seattle
0 10 20 40 60 80
100
~ Kilometers
Figure A-65. PM2.5 monitor figudistribution and major highways, Seattle, WA.
July 2009
A-132
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Site A
Site B
SiteC
AGS Site ID
53-033-0024
53-053-0029
53-061-1007
A
B
c
Mean
8.9
10.2
9.2
Obs
352
354
591
SD
7,3
10.1
7.9
1!
c
.2
ro
fin -
50
40
30
c
(L>
U
§ 20
10
1 =winter
2=spring
3=summer 0
4—fali
1234 1234 1234
Figure A-66. Box plots illustrating the seasonal distribution of 24-h avg PM2.5 concentrations for
Seattle, WA.
Table A-11. Inter-sampler correlation statistics for each pair of PM2.5 monitors reporting to AQS for
Seattle, WA.
A
B
C
A
1.00
0.89
0.86
(0.0,0.00)
(6.3,0.16)
(4.5,0.14)
352
337
331
B
R
1.00
0.80
(P90, COD)
(0.0,0.00)
(7.8,0.20)
N
354
335
C
1.00
(0.0,0.00)
591
July 2009
A-133
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
10 20 30 40 50 60
Distance Between Samplers (km)
70
80
90
100
Figure A-67. PM2.5 inter-sampler correlations as a function of distance between monitors for Seattle,
WA.
July 2009
A-134
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Interstates
Louis Major Highways
Louis
100
ZD Kilometers
Figure A-68. FM2.5 monitor distribution and major highways, St. Louis, MO.
July 2009
A-135
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Site A
SiteB
SiteC
SrteD
SiteE
Site F
AGS Site ID
17-083-1001
17-119-1007
17-118-2009
17-119-3007
17-183-0010
17-183-4001
Mean
Obs
SO
50
A
13,2
173
7.9
B
16.5
329
82
C
14.6
163
7.7
D
14.4
349
7.5
E
15.8
186
7.8
F
14.2
34S
7.1
ST
E
c
o
c
0>
u
c
o
u
40
30
20
10
1=winter
2=$prirtg
3=summer
4=fall
0 -
!i
Site G
SiteH
Site I
Site J
Site K
Site L
AOS Site ID
29-099-0012
29-183-1002
29-189-2003
29-510-0007
29-510-0085
29-510-0087
12 3 4
6
Mean 13.9
Obs 1040
SD 74
50 '
-------
Table A-12. Inter-sampler correlation statistics for each pair of PM2.5 monitors reporting to AQS for St.
Louis, MO.
Site
A
K
L
A
1.00
0.85
0.93
0.89
0.88
0.86
0.85
0.93
0.86
0.84
0.84
0.88
(0.0,0.00)
(10.5,0.23)
(4.7,0.17)
(5.0,0.17)
(7.3,0.20)
(6.2,0.18)
(4.8,0.17)
(4.1,0.13)
(4.4,0.16)
(6.0,0.18)
(5.7,0.19)
(5.3,0.17)
173
156
129
162
146
156
167
158
162
168
169
166
1.00
0.89
0.86
0.85
0.82
0.88
0.89
0.88
0.86
0.87
0.89
(0.0,0.00)
(8.6,0.16)
(7.4,0.16)
(7.7,0.16)
(8.6,0.17)
(7.8,0.17)
(8.2,0.18)
(7.9,0.17)
(7.7,0.17)
(7.5,0.16)
(6.8,0.14)
329
135
301
156
306
312
305
318
316
316
315
1.00
0.94
0.91
0.88
0.90
0.96
0.94
0.90
0.89
0.94
(0.0,0.00)
(4.0,0.11)
(6.4,0.13)
(5.7,0.13)
(5.5,0.13)
(3.9,0.11)
(5.3,0.11)
(5.7,0.13)
(5.6,0.14)
(4.4,0.11)
163
139
124
133
158
141
144
158
160
156
1.00
0.89
0.84
0.89
0.94
0.92
0.89
0.88
0.92
(0.0,0.00)
(5.7,0.13)
(6.0,0.15)
(4.9,0.12)
(4.3,0.12)
(4.5,0.11)
(4.7,0.13)
(4.6,0.12)
(3.9,0.11)
349
156
314
331
315
326
335
332
336
1.00
0.90
0.91
0.90
0.91
0.93
0.91
0.95
(0.0,0.00)
(5.5,0.12)
(6.2,0.13)
(5.8,0.16)
(5.3,0.14)
(5.1,0.13)
(4.9,0.13)
(3.7,0.10)
166
152
159
153
157
160
163
160
1.00
0.89
0.86
0.88
0.88
0.85
0.88
(0.0,0.00)
(5.4,0.12)
(6.1,0.16)
(5.4,0.13)
(5.3,0.14)
(5.6,0.14)
(5.4,0.13)
349
333
317
332
337
332
334
1.00
0.93
0.94
0.96
0.93
0.94
(P90, COD)
(0.0,0.00)
(4.3,0.10)
(3.3,0.08)
(2.9,0.08)
(3.9,0.10)
(3.8,0.10)
N
1040
533
586
994
987
992
1.00
0.96
0.95
0.95
0.96
(0.0,0.00)
(3.0,0.08)
(4.1,0.12)
(3.8,0.12)
(4.0,0.11)
566
550
552
546
544
1.00
0.96
0.95
0.96
(0.0,0.00)
(3.1,0.09)
(3.1,0.10)
(3.4,0.09)
619
605
599
598
1.00
0.96
0.97
(0.0,0.00) (2.5,0.09) (2.5,0.08)
1049 1001 1007
K UN] 0.97
(0.0,0.00) (1.9,0.07)
1038 991
_L 1.00
(0.0,0.00)
1046
10 20
40 50 60
Distance Between Samplers (km)
Figure A-70 PM2.5 inter-sampler correlations as a function of distance between monitors for St.
Louis, MO.
July 2009
A-137
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Atlanta PM10 Monitors
A
Atlanta Interstates
Atlanta Major Highways
Atlanta
100
in Kilometers
Figure A-71. PMio monitor distribution and major highways, Atlanta, GA.
July 2009
A-138
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
AGS Site ID
Site A 13-089-2001
Site B 13-097-0003
SiteC 13-121-0001
SiteD 13-121-0032
SiteE 13-121-0043
Site F 13-255-0002
50
cn
3
c 40
o
m
c 30
0)
u
c
o
u 20
10
1-winter
2 spring
3-summer*
4—fall
A
Mean 24,7
Obs 172
SD 13.0
70
60
B
21.4
178
9.3
C
23.4
171
9.5
0
26.6
174
11.8
E
25.0
995
11.5
F
21.6
178
9.7
1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 12 3 4
Figure A-72. Box plots illustrating the seasonal distribution of 24-h avg PM10 concentrations for
Atlanta, GA.
Table A-13. Inter-sampler correlation statistics for each pair of PM10 monitors reporting to AQS for
Atlanta, GA.
Site
A
B
C
D
E
F
A
1.00
0.69
0.74
0.78
0.70
0.59
(0.0,0.00)
(18.0,0.22)
(15.0,0.20)
(13.0,0.20)
(16.0,0.22)
(20.0,0.24)
172
169
162
165
158
164
B
1.00
0.88
0.79
0.71
0.82
(0.0,0.00)
(6.0,0.12)
(14.5,0.17)
(16.0,0.18)
(10.0,0.14)
178
167
170
162
169
C
1.00
0.88
0.84
0.82
(0.0,0.00)
(9.0,0.13)
(10.0,0.13)
(9.0,0.15)
171
162
155
161
D
1.00
0.75
0.74
R
(0.0,0.00)
(12.0,0.15)
(15.0,0.20)
(P90, COD)
174
158
166
E
N
1.00
0.67
(0.0,0.00)
(17.0,0.19)
995
163
F 1.00
(0.0,0.00)
178
July 2009
A-139
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Distance Between Samplers (km)
90 100
Figure A-73. PM10 inter-sampler correlations as a function of distance between monitors for Atlanta,
GA.
July 2009
A-140
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
QJ
r
• Birmingham PM10 Monitors
Birmingham Interstates
Birmingham Major Highways
Birmingham
0 10 20 40 60
80
100
~ Kilometers
Figure A-74. PMio monitor distribution and major highways, Birmingham, AL.
July 2009
A-141
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Site A
SfeB
Site C
Site 0
SiteE
SieF
SileG
SifeH
Site I
Site J
AOS Site ID
01-073-0002
01-073-0023
01 073-0034
01-073-1003
01-073-1008
01-073-1010
01-073-2003
01-073-6002
01-073-6003
01-07340(14
1 winter
2 spring
3 -summer
4=fa!l
A
B
C
O
E
F
G
H
i
J
29 J
32.9
26.5
27.1
278
24?
20.0
28.8
38.0
48.2
180
1095
224
183
179
179
1090
181
1087
1080
126
20 0
If 4
11.8
143
11,0
14,0
12.0
29 5
30.0
f H
1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 123 4 1234 1234
Figure A-75. Box plots illustrating the seasonal distribution of 24-h avg PM10 concentrations for
Birmingham, AL.
Table A-14. Inter-sampler correlation statistics for each pair of PM10 monitors reporting to AQS for
Birmingham, AL.
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
A
1.00
0.80
0.88
0.86
0.78
0.84
0.77
0.78
0.41
0.29
(0.0,0.00)
(23.0,0.16)
(11.0,0.11)
(12.0,0.13)
(12.0,0.14)
(13.0,0.13)
(15.0,0.18)
(14.0,0.15)
(41.0,0.30)
(68.0,0.34)
180
180
174
180
176
171
180
178
179
177
B
1.00
0.82
0.74
0.61
0.73
0.75
0.71
0.26
0.23
(0.0,0.00)
(23.0,0.17)
(25.0,0.21)
(26.0,0.20)
(26.0,0.19)
(25.0,0.20)
(25.0,0.22)
(51.0,0.33)
(57.0,0.36)
1095
224
183
179
179
1090
181
1087
1080
C
1.00
0.84
0.66
0.78
0.74
0.80
0.33
0.41
(0.0,0.00)
(10.0,0.12)
(15.0,0.16)
(12.0,0.14)
(14.0,0.17)
(13.0,0.15)
(43.0,0.32)
(62.0,0.34)
224
175
171
168
224
173
222
221
D
1.00
0.67
0.79
0.76
0.84
0.45
0.41
(0.0,0.00)
(15.0,0.17)
(12.0,0.15)
(14.0,0.17)
(11.0,0.12)
(42.0,0.30)
(65.5,0.34)
183
178
173
183
180
182
180
E
1.00
0.67
0.64
0.56
0.33
0.12
(0.0,0.00)
(16.0,0.15)
(18.0,0.18)
(19.0,0.20)
(45.0,0.32)
(71.0,0.39)
179
169
179
176
178
176
F
1.00
0.75
0.74
0.36
0.21
(0.0,0.00)
(14.0,0.16)
(15.0,0.17)
(43.0,0.32)
(71.0,0.38)
179 179 171 178 177
1.00 076 OJ59 0.15
(0.0,0.00) (15.0,0.19) (43.0,0.27) (63.0,0.39)
1090
181
1083
1075
H
1.00
0.58
0.50
(0.0,0.00)
(38.0,0.27)
(59.0,0.31)
181
180
178
I
1.00
0.05
(0.0,0.00)
(72.0,0.40)
1087
1072
J
1.00
(0.0,0.00)
1080
July 2009
A-142
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Distance Between Samplers (km)
90 100
Figure A-76 PM10 inter-sampler correlations as a function of distance between monitors for
Birmingham, AL.
July 2009
A-143
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
cj\
Chicago PM10 Monitors
Chicago Interstates
Chicago Major Highways
Chicago
0 10 20 40 60 80
100
~ Kilometers
Figure A-77. PMio monitor distribution and major highways, Chicago, IL.
July 2009
A-144
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
AQS Site ID
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
Site A
17-031-0001
Mean
22,4
24,7
30.4
32.4
24.5
27.2
26.9
21.8
Site 8
17-031-0022
Obs
179
1077
176
1058
174
178
174
176
SiteC
17-031-0060
SD
10,9
13,1
15.1
17.3
11,9
13.4
12,3
12.3
Site D 17-031-1016 80 -
SfeE 17-031-1901
Site F 17-031-2001
Site 6 17-031-3301
SteH 17-197-1002
60 -
1 =winter
2=spring _
3=summer
4=fa|| 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234
AOS Site ID
Site I 18-089-0006 Mean
Site J 18-089-0022
Site K 18-089-0023
Site I 18-089-2010
SiteM 18-127-0022
Site N 18-127-0023
Site 0 18-127-0024
Obs
SD
60 -
70
S-
£
88
50
c
o
2 40
30
20
10
1-- winter
2=ipring
3=5ummer g
4- fall
I
28 2
f 82
138
J
27$
1059
16 1
K
26 4
172
95
18,6
189
91
M
172
173
112
N
24 J
1051
151
0
18 3
'89
107
I
1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234
Figure A-78. Box plots illustrating the seasonal distribution of 24-h avg PM10 concentrations for
Chicago, IL.
July 2009
A-145
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table A-15. Inter-sampler correlation statistics for each pair of PM10 monitors reporting to AQS for
Chicago, IL.
Site
A B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
0
A
1.00 0.78
0.68
0.83
0.93
0.92
0.86
0.79
0.75
0.14
0.69
0.89
0.55
0.27
0.75
(0.0,0.00) (15.0,0.18)
(23.0,0.24)
(25.0,0.22)
(8.0,0.10)
(11.0,0.13)
(12.0,0.17)
(12.0,0.18)
(13.0,0.18)
(22.0,0.28)
(15.0,0.21)
(13.0,0.22)
(21.0,0.30)
(16.0,0.24)
(15.0,0.23)
179 176
173
174
171
173
171
167
179
173
169
166
170
171
166
B
1.00
0.66
0.74
0.76
0.84
0.79
0.74
0.68
0.36
0.73
0.81
0.66
0.33
0.77
(0.0,0.00)
(23.0,0.23)
(23.0,0.21)
(14.0,0.17)
(12.0,0.15)
(13.0,0.18)
(17.0,0.23)
(16.0,0.19)
(22.0,0.24)
(16.0,0.19)
(18.0,0.27)
(23.0,0.31)
(19.0,0.25)
(20.0,0.26)
1077
173
1040
171
173
171
173
179
1041
169
166
170
1033
166
C
1.00
0.63
0.72
0.74
0.64
0.62
0.62
0.19
0.49
0.66
0.39
0.27
0.61
(0.0,0.00)
(26.0,0.23)
(21.0,0.21)
(18.5,0.19)
(19.0,0.21)
(22.0,0.27)
(23.0,0.20)
(26.5,0.28)
(24.0,0.23)
(29.0,0.37)
(33.0,0.40)
(26.0,0.26)
(31.0,0.35)
176
171
169
170
168
164
176
170
166
163
167
168
163
D
1.00
0.79
0.85
0.79
0.74
0.70
0.23
0.69
0.82
0.61
0.29
0.76
(0.0,0.00)
(27.0,0.21)
(19.0,0.17)
(23.0,0.19)
(27.0,0.28)
(20.0,0.19)
(32.0,0.29)
(24.0,0.23)
(31.0,0.36)
(36.0,0.39)
(31.0,0.29)
(31.0,0.33)
1058
169
171
169
171
177
1022
168
166
168
1020
164
E
1.00
0.93
0.84
0.86
0.74
0.17
0.70
0.89
0.53
0.34
0.73
(0.0,0.00)
(9.0,0.10)
(13.0,0.16)
(10.0,0.16)
(13.0,0.16)
(22.0,0.26)
(15.0,0.19)
(15.0,0.25)
(22.0,0.33)
(17.0,0.22)
(18.0,0.25)
174
168
166
163
174
168
164
161
166
166
163
F
1.00
0.84
0.86
0.77
0.21
0.75
0.89
0.62
0.32
0.80
(0.0,0.00)
(12.0,0.15)
(13.0,0.19)
(12.0,0.14)
(23.0,0.25)
(16.0,0.17)
(18.0,0.28)
(25.0,0.34)
(20.0,0.23)
(20.0,0.27)
176
169
165
176
170
166
163
167
168
163
G
1.00
0.77
0.69
0.28
0.74
0.86
0.52
0.33
0.70
(0.0,0.00)
(15.0,0.22)
(14.0,0.18)
(23.0,0.26)
(14.0,0.18)
(19.0,0.31)
(24.0,0.36)
(19.0,0.24)
(22.0,0.30)
174
162
174
168
165
161
165
166
163
H
1.00
0.71
0.18
0.66
0.83
0.59
0.36
0.76
(0.0,0.00)
(16.0,0.23)
(27.0,0.30)
(18.0,0.25)
(13.0,0.23)
(19.0,0.29)
(17.0,0.25)
(14.0,0.22)
176
170
169
161
157
161
168
157
I
1.00
0.24
0.69
0.75
0.50
0.39
0.68
(0.0,0.00)
(22.0,0.24)
(12.0,0.15)
(20.0,0.32)
(26.0,0.37)
(16.0,0.21)
(21.0,0.30)
182
176
172
169
173
174
169
J
R
1.00
0.49
0.38
0.22
0.48
0.22
(P90, COD)
(0.0,0.00)
(15.0,0.20)
(25.0,0.34)
(28.0,0.36)
(22.0,0.21)
(27.0,0.33)
N
1059
166
163
168
1018
164
K
1.00
0.80
0.54
0.49
0.65
(0.0,0.00)
(17.0,0.32)
(24.0,0.35)
(14.0,0.19)
(21.0,0.31)
172
161
165
164
162
L
1.00
0.60
0.33
0.78
(0.0,0.00)
(15.0,0.26)
(19.0,0.31)
(10.0,0.20)
169
161
161
158
M
1.00
0.24
0.84
(0.0,0.00)
(21.0,0.35)
(8.0,0.16)
173
165
161
N
1.00
0.31
(0.0,0.00)
(19.0,0.29)
1051
161
0
1.00
(0.0,0.00)
169
July 2009
A-146
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
0.6
~ ~ , ~~
• ~ ~ ~ «
~t 4 * ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ *
l »A . A* ~ ^
~ ~"
~
o
o
0.4
0.2
~
~
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Distance Between Samplers (km)
Figure A-79. PM10 inter-sampler correlations as a function of distance between monitors for Chicago,
IL.
July 2009
A-147
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
m
Denver PM10 Monitors
Denver Interstates
Denver Major Highways
Denver
0 10 20 40 60 80
100
~ Kilometers
Figure A-80. PMm monitor distribution and major highways, Denver, CO.
July 2009
A-148
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
AQS Site ID
08-001-0006
08-001-3001
SiteC 08-013-0012
SiteD 08-031-0002
08-031-0017
08-123-0006
Site A
Site B
Site E
Site F
A
B
C
D
E
F
Mean
36.0
28.2
19.8
24.2
25.8
22.2
Obs
1043
1074
169
1039
1028
353
SD
18.3
13.2
9.7
10.6
11.5
11.2
90
80
70 -
E 60
01
n
c 50
o
2 40
4->
c
a>
c 30
o
u
20
1=winter
2=spring
3=summer
4=fa 11
10
1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234
Figure A-81. Box plots illustrating the seasonal distribution of 24-h avg PM10 concentrations for
Denver, CO.
Table A-16. Inter-sampler correlation statistics for each pair of PM10 monitors reporting to AQS for
Denver, CO.
Site
A
B
C
D
E
F
A
1.00
0.84
0.43
0.70
0.72
0.67
(0.0,0.00)
(20.0,0.16)
(36.0,0.34)
(29.0,0.24)
(26.0,0.21)
(27.0,0.28)
1043
1022
164
987
980
339
B
1.00
0.57
0.72
0.74
0.72
(0.0,0.00)
(28.0,0.27)
(17.0,0.18)
(15.0,0.16)
(18.0,0.22)
1074
169
1019
1007
348
C
1.00
0.75
0.72
0.51
(0.0,0.00)
(17.0,0.23)
(16.0,0.23)
(16.0,0.23)
169
169
156
164
D
R
1.00
0.89
0.52
(P90, COD)
(0.0,0.00)
(9.0,0.13)
(17.0,0.22)
N
1039
976
341
E
1.00
0.58
(0.0,0.00)
(17.0,0.23)
1028
330
F 1.00
July 2009
A-149
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Site
A B
C
D
E F
(0.0,0.00)
353
~
~
10 20 30 40 50 60
Distance Between Samplers (km)
70 80 90 100
Figure A-82. PM10 inter-sampler correlations as a function of distance between monitors for Denver,
CO.
July 2009
A-150
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
• Detroit PM10 Monitors
Detroit Interstates
Detroit Major Highways
Detroit
0 10 20 40 60 80 100
i—i—^^— i Kilometers
Figure A-83. PMio monitor distribution and major highways, Detroit, Mi.
July 2009
A-151
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
AGS Site ID
Site A 26-163-0001
Site B 26-163-0015
SiteC 26-163-0033
10
1=winter
2=spring
3=summer 0
4=fall
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
Figure A-84. Box plots illustrating the seasonal distribution of 24-h avg PM10 concentrations for
Detroit, Ml.
Table A-17. Inter-sampler correlation statistics for each pair of PM10 monitors reporting to AQS for
Detroit, Ml.
Site
A
B
C
A
1.00
0.77
0.74
(0.0,0.00)
(14.0,0.18)
(28.0,0.26)
174
169
172
B
1.00
0.79
(0.0,0.00)
(21.0,0.21)
176
174
C
R
1.00
(P90, COD)
N
(0.0,0.00)
1057
July 2009
A-152
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
0.8 #
«
~
0.6
o
o
0.4
0.2
10 20 30 40 50 60
Distance Between Samplers (km)
70
80
90
100
Figure A-85. PM10 inter-sampler correlations as a function of distance between monitors for Detroit,
Ml.
July 2009
A-153
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
•G
\Pj
q!\
r
Houston PM10 Monitors
Houston Interstates
Houston Major Highways
Houston
0 10 20 40 60 80 100
I Kilometers
Figure A-8S. PM10 monitor distribution and major highways, Houston, TX.
July 2009
A-154
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
AQS Site ID
Site A 48-201-0024
SiteB 48-201-0047
Site C 48-201-0082
Site D 48-201-0068
Site E 48-201-0071
Site F 48-201-1035
Site 6 48-201-1039
Mean
Obs
SD
170
160
150
140
130
sr 120
| 110
§L 100
c
o
+-»
<0
*¦*
c
HI
u
c
o
u
1=winter
2=spring
3-summer
4--fall
90
80
70
80
SO
40
30
20
10
0
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
24,5
24.0
23.4
22.3
22,7
54.8
15,8
174
178
174
175
174
359
163
9.7
9.1
9.7
10.0
9.3
35.5
7.7
1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234
Figure A-87. Box plots illustrating the seasonal distribution of 24-h avg PM10 concentrations for
Houston, TX.
Table A-18. Inter-sampler correlation statistics for each pair of PM10 monitors reporting to AQS for
Houston, TX.
SITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
A
1.00
0.84
0.78
0.76
0.43
0.56
0.75
(0.0,0.00)
(9.0,0.12)
(11.0,0.16)
(12.0,0.16)
(15.0,0.20)
(77.0,0.37)
(17.0,0.28)
174
163
158
165
167
159
156
B
1.00
0.86
0.86
0.38
0.52
0.79
(0.0,0.00)
(9.0,0.11)
(9.0,0.12)
(15.0,0.19)
(74.0,0.39)
(16.0,0.26)
178
156
160
163
158
152
C
1.00
0.83
0.41
0.38
0.85
(0.0,0.00)
(10.0,0.14)
(17.0,0.19)
(74.0,0.40)
(14.5,0.25)
174
156
159
151
150
D
1.00
0.32
0.43
0.76
(0.0,0.00)
(18.0,0.20)
(81.0,0.43)
(16.0,0.23)
175
163
155
154
E
1.00
0.15
0.38
(0.0,0.00)
(78.0,0.43)
(20.0,0.28)
R
174
158
157
F
(P90, COD)
1.00
0.37
N
(0.0,0.00)
(92.0,0.54)
359
149
G
1.00
(0.0,0.00)
163
July 2009
A-155
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
60 -
50 -
Figure A-88. Box plots illustrating the seasonal distribution of 24-h avg PM10 concentrations for New
York City, NY.
Table A-19. Inter-sampler correlation statistics for each pair of PM10 monitors reporting to AQS for
New York City, NY.
Site A
B
C
A 1.00
0.88
0.82
(0.0,0.00)
(11.0,0.20)
(12.0,0.16)
167
156
164
B
1.00
0.74
(0.0,0.00)
(18.0,0.25)
R
169
166
C (P90, COD)
1.00
N
(0.0,0.00)
178
July 2009
A-156
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
0.8
0.6
o
o
0.4
0.2
0 -I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Distance Between Samplers (km)
Figure A-89. PM10 inter-sampler correlations as a function of distance between monitors for New
York City, NY.
July 2009
A-157
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
q!\
• Philadelphia PM10 Monitors
Philadelphia Interstates
Philadelphia Major Highways
Philadelphia
0 10 20 40 60
80
100
~ Kilometers
Figure A-90. PM10 monitor distribution and major highways, Philadelphia, PA.
July 2009
A-158
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
AQS Site ID
Site A 10-003-2004 Mean
Site B 42-017-0012 Obs
SiteC 42-045-0002 SD
Site D 42-091-0013 60 •
A
B
G
D
22.8
17.1
19.9
17.6
1059
1040
1059
1049
117
9.3
9.4
9.8
50 -
£ 40
§L
c
o
«-<
to
c
(U
u
c
o
u
30
20
10
1-winter
2=spring
3=summer
4=fail
1234 1234 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
Figure A-91. Box plots illustrating the seasonal distribution of 24-h avg PM10 concentrations for
Philadelphia, PA.
Table A-20. Inter-sampler correlation statistics for each pair of PM10 monitors reporting to AQS for
Philadelphia, PA.
Site
A
B
C
D
A
1.00
0.81
0.64
0.84
(0.0,0.00)
(13.0,0.21)
(14.0,0.19)
(12.0,0.20)
1059
1005
1025
1013
B
1.00
0.71
0.93
(0.0,0.00)
(11.0,0.20)
(6.0,0.12)
1040
1006
994
C
1.00
0.73
(0.0,0.00)
(11.0,0.19)
R
1059
1014
D
(P90, COD)
1.00
N
(0.0,0.00)
1049
July 2009
A-159
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
~
0.6
o
o
0.4
0.2
0 , , , , , , , , ,
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Distance Between Samplers (km)
Figure A-92. PM10 inter-sampler correlations as a function of distance between monitors for
Philadelphia, PA.
July 2009
A-160
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
q!\
• Phoenix PM10 Monitors
Phoenix interstates
Phoenix Major Highways
Phoenix
0 10 20 40 60 80 100
~ Kilometers
Figure A-93. PMio monitor distribution and major highways, Phoenix, AZ.
July 2009
A-161
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
AGS Site ID
Site A 04-013-0019
SiteB 04-013-1003
SiteC 04-013-1004
SiteD 04-013-3002
Site E 04-013-3003
Site F 04-013-3010
Site 6 04-013-4003
SiteB 04-013-4004
sr-
E
1
c
o
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
Mean
486
309
32 8
408
32 5
515
568
34 7
Obs
790
179
182
1084
182
780
336
181
SO
23.0
14-5
146
20 0
15.2
23.1
25.8
17.0
240
220
200
180
180
140
120
I 100
y
e 80
u
60 H
40 -
1 -winter
2=$pring
3=summer
4=fall
AQS Site ID
Site I 04-013-4008
Site J 04-013-4009
SiteK 04-013-4010
Site L 04-013-4011
SiteM 04-013-8008
SiteN 04-013-3812
SiteO 04-013-999?
SiteP 04-021-0001
sr
£
20 -
260
240
220
200
180
3 160
c ho
O
2 120
§ 100
u
O 80
u
60
40
1=wir»ter
2—spring
3=symmer
4=fal
20
12 3 4
12 3 4
12 3 4
12 3 4
12 3 4
12 3 4
12 3 4
12 3 4
l
J
K
L
M
N
o
P
556
75 6
32 5
53 0
58.4
65.5
343
49 7
1073
1083
178
1O30
1?4
1080
toe?
4or
30 9
3S5
16 1
27®
WS
34 9
213
54 2
ill
i|
1234 12 3 4 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234
July 2009
A-162
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Site Q 04-021-300
SiteR 04-021-300
SiteS 04-021-300
Site T 04-021-300/
Site U 04-021-3008
SiteV 04-021-3011
SiteW 04-021-3012
SiteX 04-021-7004
Obs
SD
260
240
220
?00
180
160
140
120
u 100
60
40
1=wir>ter 20
2-spring
3=summer o
4=fall
G
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
20.8
38.8
117
27.0
80.8
747
21.5
54.3
172
171
172
175
476
475
170
322
10.0
21.4
8.8
17.1
72.5
137.5
12.5
36.3
1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234
Figure A-94. Box plots illustrating the seasonal distribution of 24-h avg PM10 concentrations for
Phoenix, AZ.
Table A-21. Inter-sampler correlation statistics for each pair of PM10 monitors reporting to AQS for
Phoenix, AZ.
Site
A B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
A
1.00 0.71
0.85
0.85
0.67
0.94
0.86
0.77
0.73
0.83
0.77
0.70
0.87
(0.0,0.00) (38.0,0.25)
(33.0,0.21)
(21.0,0.12)
(38.0,0.23)
(14.0,0.09)
(22.0,0.13)
(34.0,0.21)
(35.0,0.18)
(59.0,0.24)
(34.0,0.24)
(30.0,0.17)
(28.5,0.16)
790 178
181
788
181
779
335
180
772
781
177
789
170
B
1.00
0.84
0.82
0.85
0.67
0.74
0.81
0.67
0.68
0.75
0.60
0.63
(0.0,0.00)
(13.0,0.12)
(23.0,0.19)
(11.0,0.11)
(37.0,0.29)
(47.0,0.30)
(13.0,0.13)
(49.0,0.30)
(84.0,0.43)
(16.0,0.15)
(51.0,0.31)
(56.0,0.32)
179
179
177
179
175
179
178
175
176
175
178
164
C
1.00
0.88
0.81
0.78
0.80
0.81
0.70
0.73
0.81
0.63
0.75
(0.0,0.00)
(20.0,0.16)
(12.0,0.11)
(38.0,0.27)
(44.0,0.28)
(13.0,0.13)
(48.0,0.29)
(84.0,0.41)
(15.0,0.14)
(49.0,0.29)
(55.0, 0.30)
182
180
182
178
182
181
178
179
178
181
167
D
1.00
0.76
0.88
0.81
0.82
0.76
0.78
0.79
0.65
0.83
(0.0,0.00)
(23.0,0.17)
(22.0,0.14)
(29.0,0.16)
(18.0,0.17)
(39.0,0.20)
(71.0,0.31)
(22.0,0.19)
(35.0,0.20)
(42.0,0.21)
1084
180
778
334
179
1062
1072
176
1080
172
E
1.00
0.64
0.68
0.74
0.66
0.59
0.67
0.51
0.61
(0.0,0.00)
(40.0,0.27)
(47.0,0.29)
(16.0,0.14)
(48.0,0.29)
(88.0,0.42)
(15.0,0.15)
(49.0,0.30)
(58.0,0.31)
182
178
182
181
178
179
178
181
167
F
1.00
0.83
0.76
0.75
0.86
0.74
0.69
0.87
(0.0,0.00)
(22.0,0.13)
(36.0,0.25)
(32.0,0.17)
(54.0,0.21)
(41.0,0.28)
(30.0,0.17)
(25.0,0.15)
780
331
177
762
772
175
779
167
G
1.00
0.77
0.65
0.78
0.71
0.65
0.80
(0.0,0.00)
(44.0,0.26)
(38.0,0.19)
(48.0,0.19)
(46.0,0.30)
(36.0,0.19)
(33.0,0.16)
336
181
326
333
178
335
169
H
1.00
0.79
0.81
0.79
0.69
0.72
(0.0,0.00)
(47.0,0.26)
(79.0,0.39)
(16.0,0.14)
(43.0,0.27)
(53.0,0.29)
181 177 178 177 180 167
1.00 079 076 0£9 0.68
(0.0,0.00) (52.0,0.22) (48.0,0.29) (33.0,0.17) (38.0,0.20)
1073
1061
174
1068
171
J
1.00
0.78
0.73
0.80
(0.0,0.00)
(83.0,0.42)
(57.0,0.23)
(51.0,0.22)
1083
175
1078
171
K
1.00
0.72
0.68
(0.0,0.00)
(45.0,0.29)
(56.0,0.32)
178
177
164
L
1.00
0.63
(0.0,0.00)
(42.0,0.20)
1090
173
M
1.00
(0.0,0.00)
174
July 2009
A-163
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Site A B C D E F G H I J K L M
Table A-40, continued
N
0
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
A
0.87
0.68
0.47
0.53
0.68
0.40
0.69
0.50
0.27
0.56
0.65
(39.0,0.18)
(28.0,0.17)
(29.0,0.19)
(49.0,0.42)
(34.0,0.27)
(64.0,0.57)
(40.0,0.34)
(82.0,0.31)
(49.0,0.27)
(48.0,0.43)
(31.0,0.20)
784
783
406
171
171
171
174
475
474
169
262
B
0.59
0.75
0.75
0.73
0.63
0.55
0.59
0.53
0.66
0.65
0.64
(67.0,0.37)
(15.0,0.15)
(22.0,0.17)
(23.0,0.27)
(30.0,0.25)
(32.0,0.43)
(21.0,0.24)
(94.0,0.41)
(62.0,0.34)
(24.0,0.30)
(46.0,0.29)
178
179
175
169
168
169
172
172
177
167
155
C
0.70
0.87
0.80
0.70
0.71
0.48
0.64
0.56
0.71
0.62
0.60
(69.0,0.35)
(11.0,0.12)
(19.0,0.15)
(24.0,0.28)
(26.0,0.24)
(36.0,0.44)
(22.0,0.24)
(91.0,0.40)
(59.0,0.32)
(28.0,0.31)
(43.0,0.28)
181
182
178
172
171
172
175
175
180
170
157
D
0.78
0.86
0.73
0.63
0.68
0.49
0.65
0.66
0.45
0.58
0.70
(57.0, 0.25)
(15.0,0.12)
(30.0,0.19)
(38.0,0.38)
(27.0,0.25)
(46.0,0.53)
(31.0,0.31)
(87.0,0.34)
(59.0,0.30)
(38.0,0.39)
(32.0,0.21)
1075
1056
405
170
169
170
173
474
473
168
318
E
0.60
0.73
0.68
0.72
0.64
0.43
0.48
0.42
0.69
0.51
0.52
(67.0,0.35)
(14.0,0.14)
(21.0,0.17)
(21.0,0.28)
(27.0,0.24)
(33.0,0.44)
(21.0,0.25)
(93.0,0.41)
(63.0,0.32)
(25.0,0.32)
(46.0,0.28)
181
182
178
172
171
172
175
175
180
170
157
F
0.91
0.68
0.46
0.48
0.63
0.38
0.63
0.47
0.28
0.42
0.66
(35.0,0.14)
(31.0,0.21)
(30.0,0.22)
(60.0,0.46)
(37.0,0.30)
(68.0,0.60)
(45.0,0.39)
(80.0,0.31)
(50.0,0.27)
(57.0,0.47)
(34.0,0.22)
774
773
403
169
167
168
172
470
469
166
259
G
0.77
0.57
0.47
0.55
0.65
0.46
0.62
0.49
0.44
0.57
0.64
(35.0,0.16)
(41.0,0.25)
(36.5,0.24)
(61.0,0.47)
(41.0,0.30)
(73.0,0.61)
(58.0,0.41)
(78.0,0.28)
(45.0,0.24)
(59.0,0.48)
(32.0,0.22)
332
336
330
172
171
172
175
329
334
170
185
H
0.70
0.75
0.82
0.63
0.74
0.55
0.62
0.60
0.76
0.64
0.76
(66.0,0.33)
(15.0,0.14)
(18.0,0.15)
(29.0,0.31)
(24.5,0.22)
(37.0,0.46)
(24.0,0.25)
(84.0,0.38)
(58.0,0.29)
(30.0,0.33)
(39.0,0.25)
180
181
177
171
170
171
174
174
179
169
156
1
0.76
0.61
0.52
0.57
0.71
0.51
0.58
0.59
0.37
0.51
0.80
(42.0,0.18)
(49.0,0.27)
(39.0,0.22)
(66.0,0.47)
(41.0,0.27)
(77.0,0.60)
(60.0,0.40)
(72.0,0.27)
(46.0,0.23)
(63.0,0.47)
(30.0,0.16)
1064
1045
397
169
168
168
171
461
461
167
314
J
0.91
0.58
0.41
0.48
0.65
0.48
0.65
0.51
0.28
0.46
0.74
(29.0,0.12)
(83.0,0.38)
(68.0,0.31)
(103.0,0.58)
(75.0,0.40)
(115.0,0.69)
(92.0,0.51)
(69.0,0.26)
(59.0,0.27)
(101.0,0.58)
(62.0,0.27)
1074
1055
404
169
168
169
172
473
472
167
319
K
0.69
0.71
0.75
0.52
0.64
0.52
0.62
0.71
0.68
0.55
0.68
(73.0,0.36)
(16.0,0.16)
(19.0,0.18)
(28.0,0.29)
(27.0,0.23)
(34.0,0.44)
(22.0,0.24)
(89.0,0.40)
(59.0,0.33)
(28.0,0.32)
(44.0,0.29)
177
178
174
168
167
168
171
171
176
166
153
L
0.68
0.55
0.51
0.47
0.57
0.48
0.49
0.59
0.33
0.50
0.68
(48.0,0.20)
(44.0,0.26)
(37.0,0.22)
(66.0,0.47)
(44.5,0.29)
(71.0,0.60)
(62.0,0.40)
(75.0,0.27)
(53.0,0.24)
(67.0,0.48)
(29.0,0.18)
1081
1063
406
171
170
171
174
475
474
169
321
M
0.86
0.81
0.75
0.48
0.64
0.37
0.62
0.46
0.65
0.44
0.59
(32.0,0.16)
(53.0,0.29)
(47.0,0.30)
(74.0,0.48)
(51.0,0.32)
(80.0,0.61)
(58.5,0.41)
(62.0,0.31)
(48.0,0.26)
(68.0,0.49)
(42.0,0.24)
173
174
165
157
158
158
160
165
168
156
145
N
1.00
0.58
0.41
0.48
0.67
0.42
0.63
0.42
0.26
0.40
0.60
(0.0,0.00)
(66.0,0.32)
(51.0,0.27)
(88.0,0.53)
(62.5, 0.35)
(98.0,0.65)
(75.0,0.46)
(71.0,0.29)
(55.0, 0.27)
(88.0,0.54)
(48.0,0.24)
1086
1059
403
171
170
171
174
470
469
169
319
0
1.00
0.90
0.61
0.64
0.39
0.60
0.72
0.59
0.55
0.64
(0.0,0.00)
(35.0,0.22)
(28.0,0.31)
(25.0,0.24)
(38.0,0.47)
(22.0,0.26)
(94.0,0.39)
(69.0,0.35)
(29.0,0.33)
(44.0,0.26)
1067
407
172
171
172
175
475
473
170
317
P
1.00
0.67
0.81
0.58
0.78
0.82
0.64
0.71
0.67
(0.0,0.00)
(32.0,0.29)
(22.0,0.19)
(44.0,0.45)
(21.0,0.21)
(80.0,0.30)
(52.0,0.23)
(32.0,0.31)
(39.0,0.24)
407
169
170
169
172
400
404
167
197
Q
1.00
0.72
0.65
0.57
0.36
0.58
0.68
0.47
(0.0,0.00)
(40.0,0.33)
(15.0,0.28)
(23.0,0.24)
(104.0,0.53)
(78.0,0.46)
(15.0,0.22)
(62.0,0.43)
172
162
163
167
165
171
161
148
R
1.00
0.66
0.68
0.53
0.82
0.68
0.68
(0.0,0.00)
(55.0,0.48)
(32.0,0.27)
(75.0, 0.35)
(47.0,0.25)
(40.0,0.34)
(39.0,0.24)
171
162
165
164
171
160
148
S
1.00
0.60
0.46
0.59
0.72
0.52
(0.0,0.00)
(28.0,0.35)
(115.0,0.65)
(86.0,0.59)
(19.0,0.28)
(74.0,0.58)
172
167
165
171
162
149
T
1.00
0.56
0.66
0.68
0.61
(0.0,0.00)
(94.0,0.47)
(71.0,0.39)
(18.0,0.24)
(51.5,0.37)
175
169
174
165
150
U
1.00
0.54
0.52
0.71
(0.0,0.00)
(66.0,0.24)
(101.0,0.53)
(61.0,0.25)
476
464
165
204
V
1.00
0.60
0.64
(0.0,0.00)
(78.0,0.47)
(35.0,0.20)
475
169
206
W
1.00
0.56
(0.0,0.00)
(63.0,0.44)
170
145
1.00
(0.0,0.00)
322
July 2009
A-164
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
~~ )
~ ~~
~
>%
~ *
~
*
~ - 47 ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ "
~* ~•~•~~• 4 ~ A ~~ 4
4 4^ *4^44 ~ A
14 * # ~ ~ >4 444
~ W0# 4 ~ ~ ~ 4 ~
i ~ ~~~!~ ~ ~ •~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~< * * ~
~ ~ ~ ~*~~~ ~ ~ ~ % ~ ~~•~% » ~~
40 50 60
Distance Between Samplers (km)
100
Figure A-95. PM10 inter-sampler correlations as a function of distance between monitors for Phoenix,
AZ.
July 2009
A-165
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
rJ\
• Riverside PM10 Monitors
Riverside Interstates
Riverside Major Highways
Riverside
0 1020 40 60 80 100
^¦=1 Kilometers
Figure A-96. PM10 monitor distribution and major highways. Riverside, CA.
July 2009
A-166
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
AGS Site ID
Site A 08-065-0003
SiteB 08-065-2002
SiteC 08-065-5001
SiteD 08-085-6001
SiteE 08-065-8001
Site F 08-071-0013
SiteG 08-071-0025
E
A
Mean 37 6
Obs 174
SO 27 9
1 JO
120
110
100
. 90
SO
70
60
50
40
30
20
1=winter
2=sprlng 10
3=$ummer
4=fal! U
0
C
D
E
F
G
52 3
280
536
551
24.8
435
315
170
173
358
177
131
2? 4
21 1
319
35 4
20 9
24.8
AGS Site ID
Site H 06-071-0306
Site I 08-071-1234
Site J 08-071-2002
SieK 06-071-4001
SfteL 06-0714003
SiteM 08-071-9004
20 6
1015
154
Ol
ZL
c
o
c
©
o
c
o
o
l=winter
2~spring
3-summer g
4=faII
1234 1234 1234
H I
Mean 314
Obs 1060
SD 20.2
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
80
SO
40
30
20
10
J
54.4
178
29.5
12 3 4 12 3
K
23,8
173
136
12 3 4
L
36.5
178
20.2
2 3 4
M
477
175
24 3
I
1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234
Figure A-97. Box plots illustrating the seasonal distribution of 24-h avg PM10 concentrations for
Riverside, CA.
July 2009
A-167
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table A-22. Inter-sampler correlation statistics for each pair of PM10 monitors reporting to AQS for
Riverside, CA.
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
A
1.00
0.09
0.15
0.90
0.94
0.25
0.94
0.24
0.12
0.83
0.27
0.46
0.78
(0.0,0.00)
(50.0,0.31)
(36.0,0.32)
(33.0,0.19)
(37.0,0.24)
(41.0,0.38)
(16.0,0.13)
(25.0,0.22)
(40.0,0.39)
(38.5,0.24)
(30.0,0.23)
(32.0,0.25)
(33.0,0.21)
174
170
155
165
172
169
171
174
173
160
158
169
164
B
1.00
0.86
0.07
0.13
0.31
0.12
0.32
0.29
0.13
0.31
0.35
0.29
(0.0,0.00)
(48.0,0.37)
(47.0,0.28)
(45.0,0.27)
(57.0,0.47)
(49.0,0.26)
(48.0,0.33)
(55.0,0.49)
(51.0,0.25)
(49.0,0.35)
(51.0,0.31)
(44.0,0.24)
315
161
167
298
173
176
309
302
172
163
173
168
C
1.00
0.13
0.21
0.36
0.20
0.34
0.36
0.23
0.38
0.50
0.40
(0.0,0.00)
(49.0,0.37)
(58.0,0.42)
(24.0,0.31)
(40.0,0.35)
(27.0,0.28)
(24.0,0.30)
(57.5,0.41)
(24.0,0.27)
(30.0,0.25)
(41.0,0.34)
170
151
162
156
160
170
168
150
147
159
154
D
1.00
0.93
0.19
0.83
0.11
0.05
0.73
0.13
0.38
0.69
(0.0,0.00)
(29.0,0.17)
(52.0,0.43)
(23.0,0.17)
(38.0,0.27)
(52.0,0.46)
(26.0,0.18)
(43.0,0.30)
(40.0,0.26)
(24.5,0.16)
173
169
167
168
173
172
157
155
165
160
E
1.00
0.23
0.93
0.26
0.16
0.86
0.27
0.57
0.82
(0.0,0.00)
(63.0,0.48)
(27.0,0.17)
(46.0,0.33)
(63.5,0.51)
(18.0,0.13)
(54.0,0.36)
(40.0,0.28)
(26.0,0.15)
358
174
179
351
340
175
165
175
171
F
1.00
0.27
0.73
0.32
0.35
0.43
0.44
0.48
(0.0,0.00)
(44.0,0.41)
(28.0,0.33)
(27.0,0.32)
(57.0,0.46)
(24.5,0.32)
(35.0,0.35)
(46.0,0.43)
177
173
177
176
162
160
170
164
G
1.00
0.27
0.20
0.90
0.35
0.58
0.85
(0.0,0.00)
(30.0,0.25)
(46.5,0.45)
(25.0,0.16)
(34.0,0.27)
(29.0,0.24)
(24.0,0.15)
181
181
180
165
163
174
168
H
1.00
0.26
0.47
0.48
0.40
0.44
(0.0,0.00)
(27.0,0.33)
(45.0,0.32)
(18.0,0.18)
(29.0,0.25)
(34.0,0.26)
1060
983
178
172
178
175
I
1.00
0.20
0.45
0.38
0.35
(0.0,0.00)
(62.0,0.51)
(25.0,0.32)
(41.0,0.39)
(48.0,0.46)
1015
177
172
177
173
J
R
1.00
0.42
0.70
0.85
(P90, COD)
(0.0,0.00)
(49.0,0.35)
(37.0,0.27)
(20.0,0.15)
N
178
155
163
157
K
1.00
0.49
0.48
(0.0,0.00)
(30.0,0.26)
(38.0,0.29)
173
162
157
L
1.00
0.84
(0.0,0.00)
(24.0,0.20)
178
167
M
1.00
(0.0,0.00)
175
July 2009
A-168
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
40 50 60
Distance Between Samplers (km)
100
Figure A-98. PM10 inter-sampler correlations as a function of distance between monitors for
Riverside, CA.
July 2009
A-169
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
q!\
r
• Seattle PM10 Monitors
Seattle Interstates
Seattle Major Highways
Seattle
0 10 20 40 60 80
100
~ Kilometers
Figure A-99. PMio monitor distribution and major highways, Seattle, WA.
July 2009
A-170
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
AQS Site ID
A
B
Site A
53-033-0057
Mean
21.9
15.7
Site B
53-033-2004
Obs
1059
1077
SD
9.9
8.6
60 -
50 -
c
-------
1
0.8
0.6
o
o
0.4
0.2
10 20 30
40 50 60
Distance Between Samplers (km)
70 80 90 100
Figure A-101. PM10 inter-sampler correlations as a function of distance between monitors for Seattle,
WA.
July 2009
A-172
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
0 10 20 40 60 80 100
I Kilometers
PM10 Monitors
Interstates
Major Highways
St Louis
St Louis
St Louis
St Louis
Figure A-102. PMio monitor distribution and major highways, St. Louis, MO.
July 2009
A-173
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
AQS Site ID
A
B
C
O
E
F
G
H
I
Site A
17-117-0002
Mean
22,8
35.4
28,3
34.0
20.5
28.2
22,7
29.5
40.3
Site B
17-119-0010
Obs
171
173
174
178
185
176
179
180
1050
SrteC
17-119-3007
SD
9,4
15.5
12,2
14.7
14,4
11,7
10,4
12.8
28.5
Site D 17-183-0010 130 "
Site E: 29-189-5001 120 _
Site F 29-510-0085
Site G 29-510-0088 110 -
SiteH 29-510-0087
Site I 29-510-0088
ST 90 -
E
"oi 80 -
3
c 70 -
o
<5 60 -
1 - winter
2=spring
3-summer
1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234
Figure A-103. Box plots illustrating the seasonal distribution of 24-h avg PM10 concentrations for St.
Louis, M0.
Table A-24. Inter-sampler correlation statistics for each pair of PM10 monitors reporting to AQS for St.
Louis, M0.
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
A
1.00
0.50
0.75
0.67
0.47
0.65
0.67
0.73
0.55
(0.0,0.00)
(30.0,0.28)
(14.0,0.17)
(23.0,0.24)
(16.0,0.29)
(16.0,0.18)
(13.0,0.17)
(18.0,0.19)
(52.0,0.33)
171
161
158
156
158
163
166
168
164
B
1.00
0.65
0.63
0.46
0.68
0.68
0.64
0.52
(0.0,0.00)
(20.0,0.21)
(20.0,0.19)
(37.0,0.42)
(23.0,0.20)
(28.0,0.28)
(22.0,0.20)
(36.0,0.28)
173
161
158
160
167
169
170
166
C
1.00
0.75
0.57
0.80
0.76
0.82
0.65
(0.0,0.00)
(17.0,0.17)
(23.0,0.33)
(12.0,0.13)
(13.0,0.18)
(12.0,0.13)
(41.0,0.27)
174
157
158
165
169
169
168
D
1.00
0.44
0.82
0.81
0.80
0.59
(0.0,0.00)
(30.0,0.40)
(16.0,0.15)
(21.0,0.24)
(14.0,0.15)
(36.0,0.27)
176
157
163
165
166
169
E
1.00
0.53
0.62
0.56
0.34
(0.0,0.00)
(22.0,0.34)
(17.0,0.26)
(25.0, 0.35)
(55.0,0.42)
185
164
166
167
179
F
1.00
0.89
0.86
0.67
(0.0,0.00)
(11.0,0.16)
(12.0,0.11)
(41.0,0.27)
R
176
173
174
169
G
(P90, COD)
1.00
0.83
0.65
N
(0.0,0.00)
(16.0,0.19)
(47.0,0.32)
179
177
173
H
1.00
0.64
(0.0,0.00)
(41.0,0.27)
180 173
I 1.00
(0.0,0.00)
1050
July 2009
A-174
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1
0.2
0 , , , , , , , , ,
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Distance Between Samplers (km)
Figure A-104. PM10 inter-sampler correlations as a function of distance between monitors for St.
Louis, M0.
Table A-25. Correlation coefficients of hourly and daily average particle number, surface and volume
concentrations in selected particle size ranges.
Size range (nm)
Hourly averages
Oaily avg
All days IN = 5481)
Sundays IN = 701)
Weekdays IN = 3227)
Event days (N = 577)
No events (N = 4904)
All days IN = 263)
3-10
0.40
0.24
0.42
0.73
0.37
0.32
10-30
0.35
0.22
0.31
0.57
0.33
0.27
30-50
0.38
0.42
0.29
0.56
0.36
0.36
50-100
0.46
0.56
0.39
0.57
0.45
0.46
100-500
0.55
0.65
0.49
0.62
0.55
0.55
500-800
0.73
0.75
0.70
0.76
0.72
0.71
10-100
0.31
0.28
0.24
0.52
0.29
0.24
10-800
0.55
0.65
0.49
0.62
0.55
0.55
Total number
0.30
0.24
0.24
0.58
0.28
0.20
Total surface
0.57
0.63
0.51
0.65
0.56
0.57
Total volume
0.66
0.69
0.62
0.73
0.65
0.67
Source: Tuch et al. (2006)
July 2009
A-175
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
A.2.3.
Speciation
Atlanta, GA FRM PMJ S speciation • 4-Season Avg
Atlanta, GA
Atlanta, GA
I 1
Sulfate
OCM
Atlanta, GA FRKPMzbapeciaion • T_fali Atlanta, GA FRK PM1S spectator) - winter
Figure A-105. Seasonally averaged PMLs speciation data for 2005-2007 for a) annual, bj winter,
c) spring, d) summer and e) fall derived using the SANDWICH method in Atlanta, GA.
July 2009
A-176
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Birmingham, AL
FRM PM2.5specia6on • 4-SeasoriAvg
i i Sulfate Nitrate
I I OCM Crustal
SANDWICH sulfate and ivtrate include ammonium and water
Birmingham, AL
FRM PM2.5 speciality Spring
Birmingham, AL
FRM PM 2 5 special ion Summer
Birmingham, AL frmpm 2s special-wwer
Sulfate
Figure A-106. Seasonally averaged PM.-* speciation data for 2005-2007 for a) annual, b) winter, c)
spring, d) summer and e) fall derived using the SANDWICH method in Birmingham, AL
FRM PM2.5 speciation • T_Fall
Birmingham, AL
July 2009
A-177
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Boston, MA/NH
Boston, MA/NH
Boston, MA/NH
Boston, MA/NH
Boston, MA/NH
Boston, MA/NH
Figure A-107. Seasonally averaged PM2.5 speciation data for 2005-2007 for a) annual, b) winter, c}
spring, d) summer and e) fall derived using the SANDWICH method in Boston, MA.
July 2009
A-178
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Chicago, IL/IN
frm PM2.5speclallon - 4-SeasonAvg
we
•Jitrate EC
I 1 OCM M
SANDWICH sulfate and nitrate include ammonium and water
-jo-'
Chicago, IL/IN
FRM PM2.5 speciation - Spring
Chicago, IL/IN
FRM PM 2.5 speciation - Summer
J it ra e ec
SANDWICH sulfate and nitrate include ammonium and water
-rustal
SANDWICH sulfate and titrate include ammonium and water
Chicago, IL/IN
FRM PM2.5 spectatlon - T_Fali
Chicago, IL/IN FRM PM 2 5 speciation - Winter
] OCM Cru!
?
18 _ 10
SAICWICH sulfate and nirate include amrromum and water
1=3 Sulfate ¦
I 1 OCM Crustal
SANDWICH sulfate and nitrate include amrronium and water
Figure A-108. Seasonally averaged PM2.5 speciation data for 2005-2007 for a) annual, b) winter, c)
spring, d) summer and e) fall derived using the SANDWICH method in Chicago, IL,
July 2009
A-179
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Denver, C^^ FRMPM2.5speeiation • 4-SeasonAvg
Denver, GO FRMPM2.5spectation- spring DenVeT, GO FRMPMZSspecaten-Surmw'r
Sulfate
Nitrat
Crustal
i i Sulfate
Nitrate
Denver, CO FRMPM2.5speciation- T_Fail DenVeT, CO FRM PM25ap«iaBon • Winter
Sulfate
OCM
Figure A-109. Seasonally averaged PM2.5 speciation data for 2005-2007 for a) annual, b) winter, ci
spring, d) summer and e) fall derived using the SANDWICH method in Denver, CO.
July 2009
A-180
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Detroit, Ml
FRM PM2.5 speciatlon - 4-SeasonAvg
SANDWICH sulfate and nitrate include ammonium and water
Detroit, Ml
FRM PM2.5 speciation - Spring
i i Sulfate Nitrate
I I OCM Crust;
SANDWICH sulfate and nitrate in
Detroit, Ml
i i Sulfate Nitrate
I 1 OCM Crust; I
SANDWICH sulfate and nitrate hclutie ammonium
I I OCM Crustal
SANDWICH sulfate and nitrate include ammonium and water
Detroit, Ml
FRM PM2.5 speciatlon - T_Fall
Detroit, Ml
FRM PM2.5 speciatson - Winter
i i Sulfate Nitrate
I 1 OCM Crustal
SANDWICH sutfate and nitrate ttclude ammonium and water
Figure A-110. Seasonally averaged PM2.5 speciation data for 2005-2007 for a) annual, b) winter, c)
spring, d) summer and e) fall derived using the SANDWICH method in Detroit, ML
July 2009
A-181
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Houston, TX
SANDWICH sulfate and nitrate include ammonium and water
Houston, TX
rustal
Houston, TX
Houston, TX
Houston, TX
FRM PM2.5speclation • Winter
Sulfate
Sulfate
OCM
SANDWICH sulfate and nilrate iixlude ammonium and waiei
SANDWICH sulfate and nitrate include
Figure A-111. Seasonally averaged PM2.5 speciation data for 2005-2007 for a) annual, b) winter, c)
spring, d) summer and e) fall derived using the SANDWICH method in Houston, TX.
July 2009
A-182
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
LOS Angeles, OA FRMPM2,5speciafion- 4-8easonAv9
Los Angeles, OA frmpm2.5 specie*)- spring
LOS AngeleS, OA FRMPM2.5;{>eciation- Sumner
Los Angeles, OA
Sulfate
Nitrate
OCM
Figure A-112. Seasonally averaged PM2.5 speciation data for 2005-2007 for a} annual, b) winter, c)
spring, d) summer and e) fall derived using the SANDWICH method in Los Angeles, CA.
Los Angeles, CA FRM PM 2.5 speciation - Whter
i 1 Sulfate Nitrate ¦¦ EC
1 1 OCM Crustal
SANDWICH sulfate and nitrate include amrnorium
July 2009
A-183
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
New York, NY/NJ/OT- PM2 5
-------
Philadelphia, PA/N3,MPM25speciauon-4SeasonAV9
rsiiiui nibble"
I I OCM Crustal
SANDWICH sulfate and nitrate hclude
Philadelphia, PA/NJ
Philadelphia, PA/NJ
I 1 OCM Crustal
SANDWICH stftate and nitrate irclude ammonium and water
3"'julldlu I III jLl
I 1 OCM HM Crustal
SANDWICH sulfate ane rttrate Include armronium and voter
Philadelphia, PA/NJ
FRM PM2.5 specialist* • T.Fall
Sulfate
' ' OCM Crustal
SANDWICH sdfate and nitrate include ammonium and w»er
Philadelphia, PA/NJ
' ' OCM Crustal
SANDWICH sulfate and ntrate Include
Figure A-114. Seasonally averaged pm** speciation data for 2005-2007 for a) annual, bj winter, c)
spring, d) summer and e) fall derived using the SANDWICH method in Philadelphia.
July 2009
A-185
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Phoenix, AZ
FRM pM2,5speciallon - ^-Season Avg
Ni-mte
Crustal
SANDWICH sulfate and nitrate Include ammonium and water
Phoenix, AZ
FRM PM2.5 speciatlon - Spring
Phoenix, AZ
FRM PM 2.5 speclation - Summer
iulfate ¦¦¦ Nitrate MM EC
3 CM MM Crystal
SANDWICH sulfate and lit rate Inslude ammonium aid water
^ Q
~ a rate
Nitrate
~ OCM
81 NDVrtCH sulfate and nitrate nciude
Phoenix, AZ
FRM PM2.5 speciatlon - T_Ftll
Fhoenix, AZ
FRM PM 2.5 speclation - wntei
1 Jr.alP
Crustal
SANDWICH sulfate and nlrate include ammonium and water
IZZD S> Ifate t
ocm i
S# NDWICH sulfate and nitrate include ammonium s
I Crystal
Q
Figure A-115. Seasonally averaged pm». speciation data for 2005-2007 for a) annual, bj winter, c)
spring, d) summer and e) fall derived using the SANDWICH method in Phoenix, AZ.
July 2009
A-186
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Pittsburgh PA FRMPM2.5speetation- 4-SeasonAvg
Crustal
SANDWICH sulfate
Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
FRM PM 2.5 special ion - Summer
I I OCM Crustal
SANDWICH sulfate and nBrate include ammonium and water
I 1 OCM Crustal
SANDWICH sulfate and nutate nciude ammortum and valet
Pittsburgh, PA
FRM PM2.5 specialltn - T_Fall
Pittsburgh, PA
FRM PM25 speciatlon - V
Sulfate
Crustal
Crustal
SANDWICH sulfate and nitrate
Figure A-116. Seasonally averaged pm** speciation data for 2005-2007 for a) annual, bj winter, c)
spring, d) summer and e) fall derived using the SANDWICH method in Pittsburgh, PA.
July 2009 A-187 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Riverside, OA FRMPM2.5spedation- 4-SeasonAvg
3 Sulfate hh Nitrate '*¦ EC
I I OCM Crustal
SANDWICH sulfate and nitrate include ammonium and water
Riverside. CA
FRM PM2.5 speciatlon - Spring
Riverside, CA
FRM PM 2.5 spec lation - Summer
i ) Sulfate Nitrate "¦¦¦ EC
i 1 OCM Crustal
SANDWCH sulfate and nirate include
S'lNr- L 3 flri.rP MMI EC
i i OCM Crustal
SANDWICH sulfate and nitrate iiclude arrmorium and water
Riverside. CA
FRM PM2.5 speciatlon - T_Fall
Riverside, CA
FRM PM2.5 stieclation - Winter
i i Sulfate
i 1 OCM Crustal
SANDWICH sulfate and nirate include
Nitrate -E<
i i Sulfate Nitrate
' 1 OCM Crustal
SANDWICH sulfate and nitrate incline
Figure A-117. Seasonally averaged pm». speciation data for 2005-2007 for a) annual, bj winter, c)
spring, d) summer and e) fall derived using the SANDWICH method in Riverside, OA.
July 2009
A-188
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Seattle, WA FRMPM25 3ieciatldn . s-irinf;
Seattle, WA
Seattle, WA
FRM PM2.6 speciation - T_Fall
Sulfate
Sulfate
Crustal
Crustai
SANDWICH sufate and i
SANDWICH sulfate ana rflrate
Figure A-118. Seasonally averaged pm** speciation data for 2005-2007 for a) annual, bj winter, c)
spring, d) summer and e) fall derived using the SANDWICH method in Seattle, WA.
July 2009
A-189
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
St. Louis, MO/IL FRM PM2.Sspeclation - 4-SeasonAvg
1=1 Sulfate
Crus al
St. Louis, MO/IL
Crus al
St. Louis, MO/IL
Nitra-c
St. Louis, MO/IL
J?-*
St. Louis, MO/IL
FRM PM2.5 speclatlon - T_Fall
Sulfate
Mitra'e
Figure A-119. Seasonally averaged pm** speciation data for 2005-2007 for a) annual, bj winter, c)
spring, d) summer and e) fall derived using the SANDWICH method in St. Louis, MO,
July 2009
A-190
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Figure A-120. Seasonal patterns in pm2.5 chemical composition from city-wide monthly average values
for Atlanta, GA, 2005-2007. The gray line represents the difference in OCM calculated
using material balance and blank corrected OC x 1.4.
Figure A-121. Seasonal patterns in pm2.5 chemical composition from city-wide monthly average values
for Birmingham, AL, 2005-2007. The gray line represents the difference in OCM
calculated using material balance and blank corrected OC x 1.4.
July 2009
A-191
~RAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
30-
25-
c
c
o
Q.
E
p
"D
Q-
0.0
-5-
4
Chem I I Sulfate mass Nitrate mass EC
Figure A-122. Seasonal patterns in pm2.5 chemical composition from city-wide monthly average values
for Boston, MA, 2005-2007. The gray line represents the difference in OCM calculated
using material balance and blank corrected OC x 1.4.
30 -
25 -
jr
i 5.o-BPbi-
i
. •
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Figure A-123. Seasonal patterns in pm2.5 chemical composition from city-wide monthly average values
for Chicago, IL, 2005-2007. The gray line represents the difference in OCM calculated
using material balance and blank corrected OC x 1.4.
July 2009
A-192
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
2 3
_J Sulfate m
9 10 11 12
Figure A-124. Seasonal patterns in pm2.5 chemical composition from city-wide monthly average values
for Denver, CO, 2005-2007. The gray line represents the difference in OCM calculated
using material balance and blank corrected OC x 1.4.
£ 15-
a r*-l
/V
HI
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Figure A-125. Seasonal patterns in pm2.5 chemical composition from city-wide monthly average values
for Detroit, Ml, 2005-2007. The gray line represents the difference in OCM calculated
using material balance and blank corrected OC x 1.4.
July 2009
A-193
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
9 10 11 12
Figure A-126. Seasonal patterns in pm2.5 chemical composition from city-wide monthly average values
for Houston, TX, 2005-2007. The gray line represents the difference in OCM calculated
using material balance and blank corrected OC x 1.4.
9 0 2
Figure A-127. Seasonal patterns in pm2.5 chemical composition from city-wide monthly average values
for Los Angeles, CA, 2005-2007. The gray line represents the difference in OCM
calculated using material balance and blank corrected OC x 1.4.
July 2009
A-194
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
30
£ 15
2 3
_J Sulfate m
9 10 11 12
Figure A-128. Seasonal patterns in PM2.5 chemical composition from city-wide monthly average values
for New York City, NY, 2005-2007. The gray line represents the difference in 0CM
calculated using material balance and blank corrected 0C x 1.4.
£ 15
ill:
9 10 11 12
Figure A-129. Seasonal patterns in PM2.5 chemical composition from city-wide monthly average values
for Philadelphia, PA, 2005-2007. The gray line represents the difference in 0CM
calculated using material balance and blank corrected 0C x 1.4.
July 2009
A-195
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
30
JflJTftt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Chem I I Sulfate mass I \
9 10 11 12
Figure A-130. Seasonal patterns in pm2.5 chemical composition from city-wide monthly average values
for Phoenix, AZ, 2005-2007. The gray line represents the difference in 0CM calculated
using material balance and blank corrected 0C x 1.4.
1 8 9 10 11 12
Figure A-131. Seasonal patterns in pm2.5 chemical composition from city-wide monthly average values
for Pittsburgh, PA, 2005-2007. The gray line represents the difference in 0CM
calculated using material balance and blank corrected 0C x 1.4.
July 2009
A-196
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Figure A-132. Seasonal patterns in pm2.5 chemical composition from city-wide monthly average values
for Riverside, CA, 2005-2007. The gray line represents the difference in OCM calculated
using material balance and blank corrected OC x 1.4.
25-
20-
15-
10-
5.0-
0.0-
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Chem Sulfate mass Nitrate mass EC
Figure A-133. Seasonal patterns in pm2.5 chemical composition from city-wide monthly average values
for Seattle, WA, 2005-2007. The gray line represents the difference in OCM calculated
using material balance and blank corrected OC x 1.4.
July 2009
A-197
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
30--T
£ 15-
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Chem I I Sulfate mass I \
9 10 11 12
Figure A-134. Seasonal patterns in pm2.5 chemical composition from city-wide monthly average values
for St. Louis, MO, 2005-2007. The gray line represents the difference in OCM calculated
using material balance and blank corrected OC x 1.4.
A.2.4. Diel Trends
to
c\i
77 i
58 -
38 -
19
1
Weekday (N = 5156)
T~
6
1 I 1
12
1$T
24
77 -j
58 -
38 -
19 -
1
Weekend (N = 2086)
12
18
24
Median
Mean
90'th & 10 th
95'th & 5'th
Figure A-135. Diel plots generated from all available hourly FRM-like pm2.5 data, stratified by weekday
(left) and weekend (right), in Atlanta, GA. Included are the number of monitor days (N)
and the median, mean, 5th, 10th, 90th and 95th percentiles for each hour.
July 2009
A-198
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Weekday(N =1975)
in
CN
77
58
38
19 -
1
12
18
24
Weekend (N = 797)
77 -j
58 -
38
19 -j
1
12
18
24
• Median
¦ Mean
-- 90th & 10'th
95th & 5th
Figure A-136. Diel plots generated from all available hourly FRM-like pm2.5 data, stratified by weekday
(left) and weekend (right), in Chicago, IL. Included are the number of monitor days (N) and
the median, mean, 5th, 10th, 90th and 95th percentiles for each hour.
IT)
csi
11 -j
58 -
38 -
19 -
Weekday(N = 7032)
—T—
6
12
18
24
Weekend (N = 2854)
77 -i
58 -
38 -
19 -
1
~~r^
6
12
18
24
• Median
Mean
90th & 10th
95th & 5th
Figure A-137. Diel plots generated from all available hourly FRM-like pm2.5 data, stratified by weekday
(left) and weekend (right), in Houston, TX. Included are the number of monitor days (N)
and the median, mean, 5th, 10th, 90th and 95th percentiles for each hour.
July 2009
A-199
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
m
CN
Weekday(N = 3348)
77
58
38
19
—
6
12
18
24
77 -j
58 -
38 -
19 -
1
Weekend (N = 1364)
~ I " '
12
18
24
¦ Median
Mean
90'th & 10'th
95'th & 5'th
Figure A-138. Diel plots generated from all available hourly FRM-like pm2.5 data, stratified by weekday
(left) and weekend (right), in New York City, NY. Included are the number of monitor
days (N) and the median, mean, 5th, 10th, 90th and 95th percentiles for each hour.
in
CN
77
58 H
38
19
1
Weekday(N =981)
12
—i—
18
24
Weekend (N =407)
77 -j
58 -
38 -
19 -
1
12
18
24
¦ Median
¦ Mean
90'th & 10'th
95'th & 5'th
Figure A-139. Diel plots generated from all available hourly FRM-like pm2.5 data, stratified by weekday
(left) and weekend (right), in Pittsburgh, PA. Included are the number of monitor days (N)
and the median, mean, 5th, 10th, 90th and 95th percentiles for each hour.
July 2009
A-200
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
m
csi
77 i
58 ¦
38 -
19 -
Weekday(N = 5775)
—i—
6
—i—
12
—i—
18
—i
24
77 -j
58 -
38 -
19 -
Weekend (N = 2332)
1
—i—
6
—i—
12
—i—
18
24
Median
Mean
90'th & 10'th
95'th & 5th
Figure A-140. Diel plots generated from all available hourly FRM-like pm2.5 data, stratified by weekday
(left) and weekend (right), in Seattle, WA. Included are the number of monitor days (N)
and the median, mean, 5th, 10th, 90th and 95th percentiles for each hour.
Lf)
cn
77 n
58 -
38 -
19 -
Weekday (N = 1727)
12
18
24
Weekend (N = 692)
77 n
58 -
38 -
19 -
12
18
24
¦ Median
Mean
90'th & 10th
95'th & 5'th
Figure A-141. Diel plots generated from all available hourly FRM-like PM2.5 data, stratified by weekday
(left) and weekend (right), in St. Louis, MO. Included are the number of monitor days (N)
and the median, mean, 5th, 10th, 90th and 95th percentiles for each hour.
July 2009
A-201
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Weekday (N = 715)
Weekend (N = 293)
291 i
218
145 ¦
73 ¦
12 18 24
291 i
218
145 -
73 -
0 -P
¦ Median
¦ Mean
90th & 10'th
95th & 5th
1 6 12 18 24
Figure A-142. Diel plot generated from all available hourly FRM/FEM PM10 data, stratified by weekday
(left) and weekend (right), in Atlanta, GA. Included are the number of monitor days (N)
and the median, mean, 5th, 10th, 90th and 95th percentiles for each hour.
Weekday(N =1971)
291 n
218
145 -
73 -
» — •_ — *
Weekend (N = 793)
1
12 18
24
291
218 -j
145
73 -
0 -P
1
12 18
24
¦ Median
¦ Mean
90'th & 10'th
95'th & 5th
Figure A-143. Diel plot generated from all available hourly FRM/FEM PM10 data, stratified by weekday
(left) and weekend (right), in Chicago, IL. Included are the number of monitor days (N) and
the median, mean, 5th, 10th, 90th and 95th percentiles for each hour.
July 2009
A-202
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
291 n
218
145 -
73 -
Weekday (N = 1310)
1
12 18 24
Weekend (N = 529)
291 i
218 -
145 -
73 -
1
' I '
6
Median
Mean
90'th & 10'th
95'th & 5'th
12 18
24
Figure A-144. Diel plot generated from all available hourly FRM/FEM PM10 data, stratified by weekday
(left) and weekend (right), in Denver, CO. Included are the number of monitor days (N)
and the median, mean, 5th, 10th, 90th and 95th percentiles for each hour.
291 i
218 -
145 -
73 -
Weekday (N = 756)
Weekend (N = 302)
291 n
218
145 -
73
1
12 18 24
1 6 12 18 24
¦ Median
Mean
90'th & 10'th
95'th & 5'th
Figure A-145. Diel plot generated from all available hourly FRM/FEM PM10 data, stratified by weekday
(left) and weekend (right), in Detroit, Ml. Included are the number of monitor days (N) and
the median, mean, 5th, 10th, 90th and 95th percentiles for each hour.
July 2009
A-203
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Weekday(N =692)
Weekend (N = 277)
291
218
145
291
218
145 1
73 -
0
1 6
12
18
24
¦ Median
Mean
90'th & 10'th
95'th & 5th
Figure A-146. Diel plot generated from all available hourly FRM/FEM PM10 data, stratified by weekday
(left) and weekend (right), in Los Angeles, CA. Included are the number of monitor days
(N) and the median, mean, 5th, 10th, 90th and 95th percentiles for each hour.
291 i
218 -
145
73 -
Weekday (N = 742)
o r--r
1 6
12
18
24
291 i
218 -
145
73
Weekend (N = 303)
1
12
18
24
¦ Median
Mean
90'th & 10'th
95'th & 5th
Figure A-147. Diel plot generated from all available hourly FRM/FEM PM10 data, stratified by weekday
(left) and weekend (right), in Philadelphia, PA. Included are the number of monitor days
(N) and the median, mean, 5th, 10th, 90th and 95th percentiles for each hour.
July 2009
A-204
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Weekday(N =1532)
Weekend (N = 618)
291
218 -
145 -
291
218 ¦
145 -
73 -
1
—I—
6
12
TfT
"* I
24
¦ Median
Mean
90th & 10'th
95'th & 5th
Figure A-148. Diel plot generated from all available hourly FRM/FEM PM10 data, stratified by weekday
(left) and weekend (right), in Phoenix, AZ. Included are the number of monitor days (N)
and the median, mean, 5th, 10th, 90th and 95th percentiles for each hour.
291
218 -
145 -
73 ¦
Weekday(N = 6385)
— _ — — *
1
12
—i
24
Weekend (N = 2600)
291 -j
218 -
145
73
1
6
' I 1
12
18
—1
24
Median
Mean
90 th & 10 th
95'th & 5th
Figure A-149. Diel plot generated from all available hourly FRM/FEM PM10 data, stratified by weekday
(left) and weekend (right), in Pittsburgh, PA. Included are the number of monitor days (N)
and the median, mean, 5th, 10th, 90th and 95th percentiles for each hour.
July 2009
A-205
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Weekday (N = 1660)
291
218
145
73
Weekend (N = 673)
291 n
218 ¦
145 ¦
73 -
1
12 18
24
0 P"
Median
Mean
90'th & 10 th
95'th & 5th
1
12 18 24
Figure A-150. Diel plot generated from all available hourly FRM/FEM PM10 data, stratified by weekday
(left) and weekend (right), in Riverside, CA. Included are the number of monitor days (N)
and the median, mean, 5th, 10th, 90th and 95th percentiles for each hour.
291
218
145 ¦
73
0
Weekday (N = 752)
1
12 18 24
291 i
218 -
145 -
73
Weekend (N = 309)
o r.T?r
1 6
12 18 24
¦ Median
Mean
90'th & 10'th
95'th & 5'th
Figure A-151. Diel plot generated from all available hourly FRM/FEM PM10 data, stratified by weekday
(left) and weekend (right), in Seattle, WA. Included are the number of monitor days (N)
and the median, mean, 5th, 10th, 90th and 95th percentiles for each hour.
July 2009
A-206
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Weekday(N =1741)
291
218 -
145 -j
73
0
N — — — ,
1
1 I '
6
¦I I 1
12 18
24
Weekend(N = 706)
291
218 -I
145
73 +
¦ Median
Mean
90'th & 10'th
95'th & 5'th
o r i'
1 6
~X2 18 24
Figure A-152. Diel plot generated from all available hourly FRM/FEM PM10 data, stratified by weekday
(left) and weekend (right), in St. Louis, MO. Included are the number of monitor days (N)
and the median, mean, 5th, 10th, 90th and 95th percentiles for each hour.
A.2.5. Copollutant Measurements
Winter
Spring
PM-; j • (daw jivgi
SO; {daly arg)
NO; {daly
O j (daman 8-r*>
' »» ^ * * * + 4 * .
Summer
tr & tp 4> ^ if (?
PM - (daty wg)
Sa* sw g)
SO; (daly avg}
NO; (daly wg>
CO (daly wg)
O) (defy max B-hr)
Fall
PM* (daly avg)
* 4
PM* (daly avg)
*
, (daly avg)
PM-*,» (da* avfl)
4
SO; (daly »g)
SO; (daly avg)
NO, (da*y wg)
m
NO; (daly wg)
4 4
CO (daly avg)
4
4
00 (daly wg)
4 4
0] (daly max 8-hr)
49
Oj (daly max 8-hr)
4 * 4
i (correlrton coofcnnO
Figure A-153. Correlations between 24-h PM2.5 and co-located 24-h avg PM10, PMio 2.5, SO2, I\I0 2 and CO
and daily maximum 8-h avg O3 for Atlanta, GA, stratified by season (2005-2007). One
point is included for each available monitor pair.
July 2009
A-207
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Winter
*>»-- **>
SO; «a*y «<$
ms
r!l ill » 1
> ! > 1 < 1 t
e # #
& >f '? »*
Spring
SO; tm was
NO,
CO
Figure A-154. Correlations between 24-h PM2.5 and co-located 24-h avg PMio, PMio2.5, SO2, NO2 and CO
and daily maximum 8-h avg O3 for Birmingham, AL, stratified by season (2005-2007).
One point is included for each available monitor pair.
Writer Spring
PU
I 4 $
* M*
PM" . . 1*5a% »BS
m
80, i«Wy
* * • w *
wmm * * »
m i<«r
1 att dsMtt
m *
«5 4^w#
1 * m
co >
** * *
O- «*#, f*»
* *
0. >«B* W» IMv>
m *m *
'
¦' .¦ ¦ '¦¦¦ ¦¦¦' /-
'
„ + ,> * * ,> * * -
Summer
Fall
PM.,
1 ****
pw* im »*$.'
T *
pvwtmtH#
*
~ *| m * *
S& »»
> W ~ *
I « ** *
W, I.Mf »0
* 4i
m '.0* m-
* it *
co fsMy »$<
* «• m
0) >.
i>" i," (.'k K* <¦" fr" !>' '
k
Figure A-155. Correlations between 24-h PWh* and co-located 24-h avg PMio, PM102.5, SO2, I\I02 and CO
and daily maximum 8-h avg O3 for Boston, MA, stratified by season (2005-2007). One
point is included for each available monitor pair.
July 2009
A-208
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
r*sf iui1? «»»)
Pits-: i Ntiir »m)
SBJ toil; >TI)
m Nsilj S?|J
U«!lj S.Jf
n«:s? *f *-»' »»§>
¦ >* f? »' f? »fc »? •& |»V ft* »S H?" I? •»* V •
r (correlation coeffSciant)
• j? „*¦ ^ *> # «? ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
C cwt® I at i on coefficient)
summer
fall
PKSS f< a i If »•»}
Pm»-1 5 (iS • I 5 J Jtg)
sdi { If
£tt Null; jrji
Sj»»« iin i ly #t* l-»r svg>
? V ? >v ? V o" .V V ,» «* ¦
r (correlation coefficient)
,» «« ^ >*
5."* J.' J? S.V 1? »v «V i* A* •.» V ,» .?
r (corre1at i oo coefficient)
Figure A-156. Correlations between 24-h PWh* and co-located 24-h avg PM10, PM102.5, SO2, l\IO 2 and CO
and daily maximum 8-h avg O3 for Chicago, IL, stratified by season (2005-2007). One
point is included for each available monitor pair.
Writer
Spring
Su-nmer
Fall
-S? «»• ^ *» 5? ^
Figure A-157. Correlations between 24-h pm2.5 and co-located 24-h avg PMio, PM102.5, SO2, l\IO 2 and CO
and daily maximum 8-h avg O3 for Denver, CO, stratified by season (2005-2007). One
point is included for each available monitor pair.
July 2009
A-209
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Writer
Spring
Summer
«
Fail
Figure A-158. Correlations between 24-h PWh* and co-located 24-h avg PM10, PM102.5, SO2, l\IO 2 and CO
and daily maximum 8-h avg O3 for Houston, TX, stratified by season (2005-2007). One
point is included for each available monitor pair.
Winter
Spring
SO. !(** m®
-» »""i i" 'i" li t
J
Summer
Fall
(do*
* *m *
PU,t tiesiPf m.yj
# »1 * **
m,-., „ i d&>>
so? am
**
SO;. (csa%- wtfr
* *
m (m <*¦&
("MM# *
»: m* m
****
CO (iMf
GO i
cm®nnfffmis-m
Q-A
-------
Winter
Spring
t.«My
*xj>
SO; f «*|f *><»
*
1
1
a
ser ym*>»
«nr *m*n
a*** ms
mem
id*
00
*
t m
CO «** wsi 1
*•
G, (Jot, inrn. »-m
—
G.Wttfc «**»»*•) J
1#* »* t * *«
*v # -s* ,
Figure A-160. Correlations between 24-h PM2.5 and co-located 24-h avg PM10, PM102.5, SO2, NO2 and CO
and daily maximum 8-h avg O3 for Philadelphia, PA, stratified by season (2005-2007).
One point is included for each available monitor pair.
Winte?
Spring
to* t
-------
Winter
Spring
t.cwy
*m,„ im
SO; f «*|f *><»
mt a*** ms
Qo vm
V ' I ? S 8 1 "1 8 t *
mm, skm
,imt m». s i*)
r«j id* w®
»» ¦ .
Fail
¦p ' >,• #
Wh <«*»
Figure A-162. Correlations between 24-h PM2.5 and co-located 24-h avg PMio, PM102.5, SO2, NO2 and CO
and daily maximum 8-h avg O3 for Pittsburgh, PA, stratified by season (2005-2007). One
point is included for each available monitor pair.
Winter Spring
* ~ **
m nm*
MK„Ma*»e
SO,****#
: « *
t >* m
* * *
* ** *
co i ti&Qf 1 I
mm*
>> **
Summer Fall
f >1 m
>a*
*****
PM.c .
< i«My 4»85
SO, EtW
* * #
m>.~ mi
4
no, m. < t
* * *
no, <**«$
* * «
CO (*», * ,<
• * *
CO 50W* w®
£>•
1 * m**
O. ™ *•*>
* *
* >1
.»* ,* ,j» ,p „<> ,* - „» <* «'¦
Figure A-163. Correlations between 24-h pm2.5 and co-located 24-h avg PM10, PM102.5, SO2, l\IO 2 and CO
and daily maximum 8-h avg O3 for Riverside, CA, stratified by season (2005-2007). One
point is included for each available monitor pair.
July 2009
A-212
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Winter
(•¥, CO* j
».« , (-itffy #*JJ J
SO, <** w$ I
r"'"r
¦¦¦ .v /. ¦¦ . .. * # ,y **
Summer
* \ * *
no,*****!
SO «My w#|
o, ema ma* mn
so, km**#.
NO. «**»*.
CO iCWy m®.
Spring
* *
*1* *
"'r"r"r","r'T"T,"i r,'*-"T"-"r"'"? rr^T-r-r-r-^
Faff
* *
* * «<
! i*
Figure A-164. Correlations between 24-h PM2.5 and co-located 24-h avg PM10, PMio2.5, SO2, NO2 and CO
and daily maximum 8-h avg O3 for St. Louis, MO, stratified by season (2005-2007). One
point is included for each available monitor pair.
Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall
a'- V-P 5? 6* ^ »V ,J ^
s (corcslsCon c-aetkfinSj
-o* # -,P # tP *fc ^
-------
Winter
Spring
CO {Ciaiy avgi
Summer
NO: (daily avg).
c? ^ e"' v> «"•' c* ^
! (£OKfaatQ«coefte«(iti
•s? o* «¦> '
Figure A-166. Correlations between 24-h PM10 and co-located 24-h avg pm2.5, PM102.5 SO2, l\IO 2 and CO
and daily maximum 8-h avg O3 for Birmingham, AL, stratified by season (2005-2007).
One point is included for each available monitor pair.
Winter
Spring
so- imi
MC'j *<#»% JKffl
CO i• c®
«ice" niters e:
v,fe ,»• ^ ^ *•< #
Figure A-167. Correlations between 24-h PM10 and co-located 24-h avg pm2.5, PM102.5 SO2, l\IO2 and CO
and daily maximum 8-h avg O3 for Boston, MA, stratified by season (2005-2007). One
point is included for each available monitor pair.
July 2009
A-214
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Winter
Spring
PMss (Oaty avg)
PM.b1a (daly avg)
SO? (daily avg)
NO? Maty wg)
CO (ctely 8wg)
Os (daty ma* 8-hr)
Summer
PMi- idssy ava)
(Saty avg)
SO- (daily avg)
CO (daily avs)
Oj (daiy max 6-hr)
PM;. (dafy aval
PMm.= , {daly avg).
SOv (daly avg).
NO; (dafy svg£
CO (daily avgj
Os (cJaity max fi-in i
Figure A-168. Correlations between 24-h PM10 and co-located 24-h avg pm2.5, PMio2.5 SO2, l\IO 2 and CO
and daily maximum 8-h avg O3 for Chicago, IL, stratified by season (2005-2007). One
point is included for each available monitor pair.
Winter
Spring
PM- > idafy-
SO.. iOety swgt
NQi ¦fSfttf?
co i&*t
O. {dnV fnm 8 (rV
PM, •. (ete%r ijagS,
PM- ; . , (W®.
SO; <««* ®*B>.
f©! «•#,
CO tcwy avgi'.
C-, {<*#t ">»
*¥ **
(iMff avffi.
CO
itwy maw
Summer
;dMy iwal
*KS; ?Ka«y ami
4 m
1,0
O, (
-------
Spring
Summer
rtai% awg)
dai^ fwg}
tiaiy aval
daily avg)
daily avg)
PM? 3 (daiy avg!
* Nk
HMio.-s {ttetty swffl
SO; ftKSty avg)
CO idaky avg}
Figure A-170. Correlations between 24-h PM10 and co-located 24-h avg PM^, PM102.5 SO2, NO2 and CO
and daily maximum 8-h avg O3 for Detroit, Ml, stratified by season (2005-2007). One
point is included for each available monitor pair.
Spring
(itoly avg}
PM«,;s fdsily nvg)
SO2 (daily sa-g)
NO? (daily
CO fOaly avg)
O.. (daily ma* frhr)
Q, («>•
SO;
ty augJ
CO tasty avg)
Oj (ctefy ma* 8-lhr)
daty a
Summer
Fall
(dsiy avg) -
*
PM.W. (risiy avg).
SO2 {Bafy avg),
*
*
NO, {etaiy avg).
CO (daily avg).
I**
m *
Q> ftSaiy ma* 8-he) -
*
m
—1—1—1—r~
~i—1—!—1—1—1—r~
Figure A-171. Correlations between 24-h PM10 and co-located 24-h avg pm2.5, PMio2.5 SO2, l\IO 2 and CO
and daily maximum 8-h avg O3 for Houston, TX, stratified by season (2005-2007). One
point is included for each available monitor pair.
July 2009
A-216
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall
pm;5
da«y avg}
PM.ms
daty awgj
SO,
cMy avg)
fCh.
eft®? avg)
CO
daily avg)
0. (daiy
max 3-itt)
** * * **
# * * H »W *
PM,< (daily avg) .
PMic^ , (il3*y avg) „
SO-; (Safty avg) .
NO- (daiy avg) ,
CO (daily avg) .
Oj (daily max 8-3ir) •
s*»f # >~ »* *
H*** H # >~
t j*e *
r (ceiTe-tsBM coeSc»«(i
—i—i—i—i—i—i—s—i—s—I—?—i—i—i—r—r=
r teorrelslon coe*c«*nn
Figure A-172. Correlations between 24-h PM10 and co-located 24-h avg pm2.5, PMio2.5 SO2, l\IO 2 and CO
and daily maximum 8-h avg O3 for Los Angeles, CA, stratified by season (2005-2007).
One point is included for each available monitor pair.
Winter
PM„
daily avg)
daily avgj
so?
daily swal
NO,-
dafy avg}
co
daty avg)
0; (daty
IT® 8-hr)
Spring
-1—1—1—1—1—1—i—r
PMi, (daty avg
PM.J.H (daily av£
SO; (daily avg
NO? (daily avg
CO {dsSy avg
0;, mat 8-h?
"I 1—I 1—I 1—I 1—I 1
* >* *
* H
1 1—I 1—I 1—I 1 1—I 1—I 1—I 1—I i 1—i~
Summer
Fail
PMjt,
daily avg)
PM.S...3
daily avgj}
SO:
dafiyavgf
NOi
daHy avgj
CO
dssly avg)
Oj. (daily
ma* 0-lif)
PM;;, (daily avg
PM,j. (daily avg
* *
t>0; i/iaify avg.
NO; (daily SW£
Q (ssty sag
Oi Ma>ly mas 8-hr
f (cotrelason cm*.-»r>r)
1 (r.orrefaton coe1feient>
Figure A-173. Correlations between 24-h PM10 and co-located 24-h avg pm2.5, PMio2.5 SO2, I\I0 2 and CO
and daily maximum 8-h avg O3 for New York City, NY, stratified by season (2005-2007).
One point is included for each available monitor pair.
July 2009
A-217
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Winter
Spring
NO? (daily avcj)
Summer
Fall
Figure A-174. Correlations between 24-h PM10 and co-located 24-h avg PM2.5, PMio2.5 SO2, NO2 and CO
and daily maximum 8-h avg O3 for Philadelphia, PA, stratified by season (2005-2007).
One point is included for each available monitor pair.
Winter
Spring
(daily *vg)'
pm,mi (aafy wg) •
SO: (doty svgs •
NO. fdaty avg) ¦
CO itfstty (dB«y »
SOi (daSy avg) ¦
UQ, awgi.
CO {daily sifgj -
On (tteJy max S-r*) •
* * *
* * #
#* * * »~ 4* ~*
*»* ** * *** *
Figure A-175. Correlations between 24-h PM10 and co-located 24-h avg pm2.5, PMio2.5 SO2, l\IO2 and CO
and daily maximum 8-h avg O3 for Phoenix, AZ, stratified by season (2005-2007). One
point is included for each available monitor pair.
July 2009
A-218
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Winter
Spring
PM?. ftfesty avg)
PM.'.;;. (daly awg!
SO; {daily swg)
NO? (daily avg}
CO (dsay avg>
Oj (Oai!y max Q+tr>
' 1 I I ! J I ! i ! I I I I I I F
1—I—I—!—I—I—r-
Summer
Fall
PM, s (daily w
PM )5, [, (daily avg) .
SO? W»V swa) •
NO? (dafy avg) ,
CO ( ¦
* ** >1
PM;. I'OMy avg? .
PMi»f j (dedy ava1 .
SOj (d»ty a«g) .
MO; (dials*®
GO (daify avg),
Oj (daily ma* 8-hr).
H * ** ** H
* *t *
** 3* sfc *
9* ## *
i—r—i—i—i—i—I—i
Figure A-176. Correlations between 24-h PM10 and co-located 24-h avg PM2.5, PMio2.5 SO2, l\IO 2 and CO
and daily maximum 8-h avg O3 for Pittsburgh, PA, stratified by season (2005-2007). One
point is included for each available monitor pair.
PM:s ftfefy avg)
PM..;,;V (daily avg)
SO, (dsty avg)
MO-j (daty avai
CO (dally avg)
0? (daily i3!«* 8-lirS
PM.'i (dSlty =3Vg)
PM1 >tm **
Summer
Fall
»* ** »t si#
(6 »We *
>i M H, *
¥¥ ** **>* *
PMj.. (daily cwg) -
PMsw, (dafty avg).
SO; fcJaSy avgf.
NO; (efesfy avg).
CO (daily w
O, (fla% mas 8-!»>.
+H >~ * *
S * # 5#e
~»* * *
=* »* *
** *
Figure A-177. Correlations between 24-h PM10 and co-located 24-h avg pm2.5, PMio2.5 SO2, l\IO 2 and CO
and daily maximum 8-h avg O3 for Riverside, CA, stratified by season (2005-2007). One
point is included for each available monitor pair.
July 2009
A-219
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Winter
Spring
PM-v. {daSy avgi-j
(dafyava)-|
SO; (claiy *
(daty avgj4
CO (daisy svgH
Or. i'cls«y max ft-m-j
~1—J—1—!—f—r
h *t m
-1—\—i—e—r~
# * **
* H
** * * *
Summer
Fall
SO; (dsiy a
NO;. (daily a*g> i
CO (iiaSy avgsi
O. idaly max 8-hf) -j
~ * **
PE(fl.,s Waits' augi
PM»?> (da% avgl
80^ (da% awft!
NO, (dally a
CO {(SBily a
Gs (daily max S-lir)
* *
**
Figure A-178. Correlations between 24-h PM10 and co-located 24-h avg PM2.5, PMio2.5 SO2, l\IO 2 and CO
and daily maximum 8-h avg O3 for St. Louis, MO, stratified by season (2005-2007). One
point is included for each available monitor pair.
July 2009
A-220
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
A.3. Source Apportionment
A.3.1. Type of Receptor Models
Table A-46. Different receptor models used in the Supersite source apportionment studies: chemical
mass balance.
Receptor Model
Description
Strengths and Weaknesses
Effective Variance CMB 42,121
(Note that all models based on eq 1 or 2
are CMB equations. The term CMB used
here rejects the historical solution in
which source proxies are explicitly used
as model input and a single sample
effective variance solution is reported.)
CMB software is currently distributed by
EPA. The most recent version is the CMB
8.2, which is run in the Microsoft
Windows system.
Principle
Ambient chemical concentrations are expressed as the sum of products of species
abundances in source emissions and source contributions (eq 1 or 2). These equations are
solved for the source contribution estimates when ambient concentrations and source
pronles are input. The single-sample effective variance least squares122 is the most
commonly used solution method because it incorporates uncertainties of ambient
concentrations and source proxies in the estimate of source contributions and their
uncertainties. This reduced to the tracer solution when it is assumed that there is one
unique species for each source. Choices of source proxies should avoid collinearity, which
occurs when chemical compositions of various source emissions are not sufficiently
different.121
Data Needs
CMB requires source proxies, which are the mass fractions of particulate or gas species in
source emissions. The species and particle size fraction measured in source emissions
should match those in ambient samples to be apportioned. Several sampling and analysis
methods provide time-integrated speciation of PM2.6 and volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
for CMB. Source proxies are preferably obtained in the same geographical region as the
ambient samples, although using source proxies from different regions is commonly
practiced in the literature. The practitioner needs to decide the source proxies and species
being included in the model, on the basis of the conceptual model and model performance
measures.
Output
Effective variance CMB determines, if converged, source contributions to each sample in
terms of PM or VOC mass. CMB also generates various model performance measures,
including correlation R2, deviation n2, residue/ uncertainty ratio, and MPIN matrix that are
useful for renning the model inputs to obtain the best and most meaningful source
apportionment resolution.
Strengths
Software available providing a
good user interface.
Provides quantitative uncertainties
on source contribution estimates
based on input concentrations,
measurement uncertainties, and
collinearity of source pronles.
Quantities contributions from
source types with single particle
and organic compound
measurements.
Weaknesses
Completely compatible source and
receptor measurements are not
commonly available.
Assumes all observed mass is due
to the sources selected in advance,
which involves some subjectivity.
Chemically similar sources may
result in collinearity without more
specinc chemical markers.
Typically does not apportion
secondary particle constituents to
sources. Must be combined with
pronle aging model to estimate
secondary PM.
2 Hidy and Friedlander (1972,156546)
21 Watson et al. (1997,157121) l22(1984,045693)
Source: Watson et al. (2008,157128)
July 2009
A-221
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table A-47. Different receptor models used in the Supersites source apportionment studies: factor
analysis.
Receptor Model
Description
Strengths and Weaknesses
PMF123,124
PMFx (PMF2 and PMF3) software
is available from Dr. Pentti Paatero
at the University of Helsinki,
Finland. This software is a
Microsoft DOS application. EPA
distributes EPA PMF76 version 1.1
as a Microsoft Windows
application with better user
interface.
Principle Strengths
PMFx contains PMF2 and PMF3. PMF2 solves the CMB equations (i.e., eqs 2 and 3) using an Software available,
iterative minimization algorithm. Source proxies F, and contribution Sit are solved simultaneously.
The non-negativity constraint is implemented in the algorithm to decrease the number of possible
solutions (local minimums) in the PMF analyses, because both source pronle and contribution should
not contain negative values. There is rotational ambiguity in all two-way factor analyses (i.e., F; and
Sit matrices may be rotated and still nt the data). PMF2 allows using the FPEAK parameter to
control the rotation. A positive FPEAK value forces the program to search such solutions where
there are many zeros and large values but few intermediate values in the source matrix Fii.Fkgy can
further bind individual elements in Fn to zero. On the basis of a similar algorithm, PMF3 solves a
three-way problem.
PMFx and UNMIX estimate Fijand Sjt by minimizing:
Qorx2
=IIR-1- FiW
(A-1)
Where the weighing factor, ait, represents the magnitude of Eit, PMFx limits solutions of eq 2 to
non-negative Fij and Sjt.
Data Needs
A large number of ambient samples (usually much more than the number of factors in the model) are
required to produce a meaningful solution. Species commonly used in PMF are also those in CMB.
Weighting factors associated with each measurement need to be assigned before analysis. The
practitioner also needs to decide the number of factors, FPEAK, and Fksy in the model.
Output
PMFx reports all the elements in Fij and Sjt matrices (PMF2). It also calculates model performance
measures such as deviation n2 and standard deviation of each matrix element. The practitioner
needs to interpret the results linking them to source proxies and source contributions.
Can handle missing or below-
detection-limit data.
Weights species concentrations
by their analytical precisions.
Downweight outliers in the
robust mode.
Derives source proxies from
ambient measurements as they
would appear at the receptor
(does not require source
measurements).
Weaknesses
Requires large (> 100) ambient
datasets.
Need to determine the number of
retaining factors.
Requires knowledge of source
pronles or existing proxies to
verify the representativeness of
calculated factor proxies and
uncertainties of factor
contributions.
Relies on many parameters/initial
conditions adjustable to model
input; sensitive to the preset
parameters.
ME2125
ME2 code is available from Dr.
Pentti Paatero at the University of
Helsinki, Finland as a Microsoft
DOS application.
Principle
The PMFx algorithm is derived from ME2. Unlike PMFx that is limited to questions in the form of eq
1 or 2, ME2 solves all models in which the data values are ntted by sums of products of unknown
(and known) factor elements. The nrst part of the algorithm interprets instructions from the user
and generates a table that specines the model. The second part solves the model using an iterative
minimization approach. Additional constraints could be programmed into the model to reduce the
ambiguity in source apportionment. These constraints may include known source proxies and/or
contributions (e.g., contributions are known to be zero in some cases).
Data Needs
Data needs are similar to those of PMFx but are more nexible. In theory, any measured or unknown
variables may be included in the model as long as they satisfy linear relationships. The users need
to specify the model structure, the input, and the output.
Output
ME2 calculates and reports all unknown variables in the model.
Strengths
Software available.
Can handle user-specined models.
Possibility to include all measured
variables into the model, such as
speciated concentration over
different time scales, size
distributions, meteorological
variables, and noise parameters.
Weaknesses
Require substantial training to
access the full feature of the
software and develop a model.
Generally requires large ambient
datasets.
Need to assume linear
relationships between all
variables.
Relies on many parameters/initial
conditions adjustable to model
input; sensitive to the preset
parameters.
July 2009
A-222
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Receptor Model
Description
Strengths and Weaknesses
UNMIX 20A,2e
UNMIX code is available from Dr.
Ron Henry at the University of
Southern California as an MatLab
application. A stand alone version
(UNMIX version 6) is also available
from EPA.
Principle
UNMIX views each sample as a data point in a multidimensional space with each dimension
representing a measured species. UNMIX solves eqs 2 and 3 by using a principle component
analysis (PCA) approach to reduce the number of dimensions in the space to the number of factors
that produce the data, followed by an unique "edge detection" technique to identify "edges" denned
by the data points in the space of reduced dimension (e.g., Figures 1 and 3). The number of factors
is estimated by the NUMFACT algorithm in advancel 27, which reports the R2 and signal-to-noise
(S|N) ratio associated with the nrst N principle components (PCs) in the data matrix. The number of
factors should coincide with the number of PCs with SfN ratio > 2. Once the data are plotted on
the reduced space, an edge is actually a hyperplan that signines missing or small contribution from
one or more factors. Therefore, UNMIX searches all the edges and uses them to calculate the
vertices of the simplex, which are then converted back to source composition and contributions.
Geometrical concepts of self-modeling curve resolution are used to ensure that the results obey (to
within error) non-negativity constraints on source compositions and contributions.
Data Needs
A large number of ambient samples (usually much more than the number of factors in the model) are
required to achieve a meaningful solution. Species commonly used in UNMIX are also those in CMB.
The measurement precision is not required. The practitioner needs to specify the number of factors
on the basis of the NUMFACT results.
Output
UNMIX determines all the elements in the factor (Fij) and contribution (Sjt) matrices. It also
calculates the uncertainty associated with the factor elements and model performance measures
including: (1) R2, (2) SfN ratio, and (3) strength.
Strengths
Software available with graphical
user interface.
Does not require source
measurements.
Provide graphical problem
diagnostic tools (e.g., species
scatter plot).
Provide evaluation tools (e.g., R2,
S|N ratio).
Weaknesses
Requires large (> 100) ambient
datasets.
Need to assume or predetermine
number of retained factors.
Does not make explicit use of
errors or uncertainties in ambient
measurements.
Cannot use samples containing
missing data in any species.
Limited to a maximum of 7 or 14
(UNMIX version 6) factors.
Can report multiple or no
solutions.
Requires knowledge of existing
source proxies to evaluate the
solutions.
July 2009
A-223
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Receptor Model
Description
Strengths and Weaknesses
PDRM07 Principle
PDRM was developed under the PDRM estimates contributions from selected stationary sources for a receptor site using high time-
Supersites Program and requires resolution measurements and meteorological data. In PDRM, eq 2 is modined to:
MatLab or equivalent software to
perform the calculation. ft = 2 I + ^
i !
(A-2)
where is interpreted as the emission rate of species i from stationary source j and (n/O,t is the
meteorological dispersion factor averaged over the time interval t. Equation 4 is solved for ER(\ and
/n/Q,t simultaneously by a nonlinear nt minimizing the objective function, FUN:
1 " " r /v\™»
iil§) -
11=1 pi l ^
(A-3)
Because the number of solutions for a product of unknowns is innnite, additional constraints are
set up for (n/Q,i on the basis of the Gaussian plume model, thus:
/vA** /Y\*<
mi. -(i). -«ti
' |1 ' |,1 !,1
(x\m _ 1
U/i( 2Sfj
1 (i + h\2
(A-4)
Eqs 6 and 7 limit the solution of eq 5 within the lower (LB) and upper (UB) bound of those predicted
by the Gaussian plume model using different parameterizations.
Data Needs
PDRM requires speciated measurements at a higher time-resolution than typical CMB or PMF
applications because of the fast-changing meteorological parameters. PDRM also requires data for
eq 7: transport speed (u), lateral and vertical dispersion parameters (cry and ai), and stack height
(A).
Output
PDRM determines emission rates and contributions from each point source considered in the model
at the same time resolution as the measurement.
Strengths
Explicitly include meteorological
information and stack
connguration of stationary
sources into the model.
Do not require source
measurements.
Do not need to interpret the
relations between factors and
sources.
Commercial software (e.g.,
MatLab) available for performing
nonlinear Dt.
Suitable for high time-resolution
measurement.
Weaknesses
Can only handle stationary
sources but not area or mobile
sources.
Need to assume that only
stationary sources are considered
in the model contribute
signincantly for a measurement
at the receptor site.
Do not account for uncertainty in
the measurement.
Meteorological data may not be
always available or accurate.
Gaussian plume model may not be
representative of the actual
atmospheric dispersion.
Sensitive to the imposed
constraints (UB and LB).
July 2009
A-224
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Receptor Model
Description
Strengths and Weaknesses
PLS128
Principle
PLS examines the relationships between a set of predictor (independent) and response (dependent)
variables. It assumes that the predictor and response variables are controlled by independent
"latent variables" less in number than either the predictor or the response variables. In recent
applications,90 PM chemical composition and size distribution are used as predictor [X) and
response (K) variables, respectively. Eq 2 is modined to:
* = 2¥h + f»
«. = E¥i.+ °i
(A-5)
(A-6)
where T and U are matrices of so-called "latent variables," and P and C are loading matrices. If /
and Kare correlated to some degree, Tand //would show some similarity. Equations 8 and 9 are
solved by an iterative algorithm "NIPALS," which attempts to minimize E,D, and the difference
between 7" and f simultaneously. If T and U end up being close enough, the / and Yvariables can
be explained by the same latent variables. These latent variables may then be interpreted as source
or source categories.
Data Needs
Typical applications of PLS require both chemical speciated and size-segregated measurements. The
practitioner needs to decide the number of latent variables on the basis of the correlation of
resulting Tand //matrices.
Output
PLS calculates latent variables, which are common factors best explaining the predictor and
response variables, and the residues from ~tting. R> and Ry,
Strengths
Fit two types of measurements
(e.g., chemistry and size) with
common factors. Provide more
information to identify sources.
Analyze strongly collinear and
noisy dataset.
Do not require source
measurements.
Weaknesses
Requires large (> 100) ambient
datasets.
Difncult to relate latent variables
to any physical quantities.
Do not provide quantitative
source contribution estimates.
Need to decide the number of
latent variables.
Do not explicitly make use of
measurement uncertainties.
R, = 1 - wr(EV»ar(A)
R, = 1 - wwymrfy)
indicate the degree to which variables / and Y are explained by the latent variables.
Oan result in no solution.
(A-7)
(A-8)
9 Henry (1997,020941)
4 Lewis etal. (2003, 088413)
6Ogulei etal. (2006,119975)
1 Park et al. (2005,156844)
23 Paatero (1997, 087001)
24 Paatero et al. (2002,156836)
25 Paatero (1999,156835)
26 Henry (2003,156540)
Source: Watson et al. (2008,157128)
July 2009
A-225
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table A-48. Different receptor models used in the Supersites source apportionment studies: tracer-
based methods.
Receptor Model
Description
Strengths and Weaknesses
£p 129,130
The EF method may use a MLR
algorithm, which is available in most
statistical and spreadsheet software
Principle
A tracer (or marker) for a particular source or source category is a species enriched heavily
in the source emission against other species and other sources. Using EFs-, concentration
of the ith pollutant at a receptor site at time t (i.e., Ci.t) can be expressed as:
! i V
(A-7)
where the enrichment factor EFi.pj is the ratio of emission rate of the pollutant of interest
(Fii) and tracer species (Fn) from source j. Cpj.t is the concentration of tracer species for
source j at time t, and Zi,t represents contributions from all other sources (including the
background level). The solution for eq 12 is situation-dependent. EFi,n is usually unknown
but may be estimated from source proxies, edges of a two-way scatter plot (e.g., Figures
1 and 3), or the ratio of Ci.tto Cw,t for a particular period when it is believed that a single
source is dominant. In cases where Zi.t is a constant, EFi,n may be derived from MLR.
Data Needs
The minimum data needs include concentrations of all primary tracers at the receptor site.
Known EFs or background levels are helpful.
Output
The EF method determines contributions to species i from each source considered in the
model.
Strengths
No special software needed.
Indicate presence or absence of particular
emitters.
Provides evidence of secondary PM
formation and changes in source impacts
by changes in ambient composition.
Could use a large (> 100) dataset or a
small (e.g., < 10) dataset.
Weaknesses
Semiquantitative method, not specinc
especially when the EFs are unknown in
advance.
Limited to sources with unique markers.
Tracer species must be exclusively from
the sources or source categories
examined.
Provide very limited error estimates.
More useful for sourcefprocess
identincation than for quantisation.
NNLS
The MatLab Optimization Toolbox
provides a function "Isqnonneg" for
performing the NNLS calculation.
Principle
NNLS also solves the EF equation (eq 12 or equivalent) with known target species and
tracer concentrations. Conventional MLR solutions to eq 12 may lead to negative EFs due
to the uncertainty in measurements or colinearity in source contributions. This is avoided in
the NNLS approach since additional non-negative constraints are built into the algorithm,
i.e.:
(A-8)
Utilizing orthogonal decomposition, a NNLS problem can be reduced to the more familiar
least-distance programming and solved by a set of iterative subroutines developed and
tested by Lawson and Hanson.131 In a more general sense, NNLS linearly relates a response
variable to a set of independent variables with only non-negative coefncients.
Data Needs
When applied to EF or MLR problems, NNLS requires the concentration of target (response)
and tracer (independent) species.
Output
NNLS generates non-negative regression coefncients for an EFfMLR problem and these
coefncients can be related to the source contributions.
Strengths
Implemented by many statistical
software packages.
Generate only non-negative EFs or
regression coefncients.
Do not require source measurements.
Possible to include meteorological or
other (besides chemistry) data into the
model.
Weaknesses
Require a large (> 100) set of ambient
measurements.
Semiquantitative method, not specinc.
Do not explicitly consider measurement
uncertainties.
Tracer species must be exclusively from
the sources or source categories
examined.
Non-negative constraints may not be
appropriate in some cases.
July 2009
A-226
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Receptor Model
Description
Strengths and Weaknesses
FAC1
Principle
FAC provides a simple mean of estimating the SOA production rate using the emission
inventories of primary precursor VOCs. FAC is actually a source-oriented modeling
technique but it does not take into account all the atmospheric processes. FAC is denned
as the fraction of SOA that would result from the reactions of a particular VOC:
1 = V
FAC, x ((VQCJ) x fraction of VOC (feasted)
(A-9)
where [VOCijo is the emission rate of VOCi and [SOA] is the formation rate of SOA.
Equation 14 can be viewed as an extension of eq 12 but concentrations are replaced with
emission rates and EFs are replaced with FACs. FAC and the fraction of VOC reacted under
typical ambient conditions have been developed for a large number of hydrocarbons
>C6111 The most signincant SOA precursors are aromatic compounds (especially toluene,
xylene, and trimethylbenzenes) and terpenes. In most applications, these FACs are used
directly to estimate SOA.
Data Needs
FAC requires the VOC emission inventory in the region of interest. The knowledge of O3
and radiation intensity is also helpful for slight modincations of the FACs.
Output
FAC method estimates the total production rate of SOA.
Strengths
Link SOA to primary VOC emissions so
that SOA can also be treated as primary
particles in the PM modeling.
Simple and inexpensive.
Weaknesses
Ignore the innuence of aerosol
concentration and temperature-dependent
gas-particle partitioning on SOA yield.
Limited by the accuracy of VOC emission
inventory.
Do not directly infer the contribution of
each source to ambient SOA
concentration.
Difncult to verify.
"Grosjean and Seinfeld (1989, 045643)
BDarnsetal. (1970,156379)
30Reimann and De Caritat (2000,013269)
3,Lawson and Hanson (1974)
32 Wang and Hopke (1989)
Source: Watson et al. (2008)
July 2009
A-227
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table A-49. Different receptor models used in the Supersites source apportionment studies:
meteorology-based methods.
Receptor Model
Description
Strengths and
Weaknesses
CPF 1
Principle
CPF estimates the probability that a given source contribution from a given wind direction will exceed a
predetermined threshold criterion (e.g., upper 25th percentile of the fractional contribution from the source of
interest). The calculation of CPF uses source contributions (i.e., S{t in eq 2) determined for the receptor site and
local wind direction data matching each of the source contributions in time. These data are then segregated to
several sectors according to wind direction and the desired resolution (usually 36 sectors at a 10° resolution).
Data with very low wind speed (e.g., < 0.1 mfsec) are usually excluded from analysis because of the uncertain
wind direction. CPF is then determined by:
CPFi H'i
"A»
'•Ai
(A-10)
where mnn is the number of occurrences in the direction sector ~~~ + ~~ that exceeds the specked threshold,
and nnn is the total number of wind occurrences in that sector. Because wind direction is changing rapidly, high-
time resolution measurements (e.g., minutes to hours) are preferred for a CPF analysis. If the calculated source
contributions represent long-term averages, wind direction needs to be averaged over the same duration. In
addition to source contribution, CPF can be applied directly to pollutant concentration measurements at a
receptor site.
Data Needs
CPF requires the time series of source contributions at a receptor site, which is usually determined by CMB or
factor analysis methods using speciated measurements at the site. CPF also requires wind direction and wind
speed data averaged over the same time resolution as the sampling duration.
Output
CPF reports the probability of "high" contribution from a particular source or factor occurring within each wind
direction sector. The results are often presented in a wind rose plot (e.g., Figure 6a).
Strengths
Infer the direction of
sources or factors
relative to the
receptor site.
Provide vesication
for the source
identincation made by
factor analysis
method.
Easy to implement.
Weaknesses
Criterion for the
threshold is
subjective.
Absolute source
contribution (or
fractional
contribution) may be
innuenced by other
factors besides wind
direction (e.g., wind
speed, mixing height).
Local and near-
surface wind direction
only has a limited
implication for long-
range transport.
Easy to be biased by a
small number of wind
occurrences in a
particular sector.
Work better for
stationary sources
than area or mobile
sources.
July 2009
A-228
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Receptor Model
Description
Strengths and
Weaknesses
NPR 136,137 Principle
NPR calculates the expected (averaged) source contribution as a function of wind direction following:
/ a — Wr\
m= v,fi£ir
ai ;
(A-11)
where Wi is the wind direction for the ith sample and Si is the contribution from a specinc source to that sample,
determined from measurements at the receptor site. K is a weighting function called the kernel estimator. There
are many possible choices for K. Henry et al.130 recommend either Gaussian or Epanechnikov functions. The
most important decision in NPR is the choice of the smoothing parameter ~~. If ~~ is too large, S(n) will be too
smooth and meaningful peaks could be lost. If it is too small, S(n) will have too many small, meaningless peaks.
~~ needs to be chosen according to the project-specinc spatial distribution of sources. NPR also estimates the
conndence intervals of S(n) based on the asymptotic normal distribution of the kernel estimates, thus:
t;-i /8 - W\ ,
2, *1—x is, - s#))1
Asw= ' /„ /E-Wiu'
f^KNr
(A-12)
Data Needs
NPR requires the same data as the CPF method, including the time series of source/factor contributions (or
fractional contributions) at the receptor site and local wind direction data matching the sampling duration in
time.
Output
NPR reports the distribution of source contribution as a function of wind direction and the conndence level
associated with it.
Strengths
Infer the direction of
sources or factors
relative to the
receptor site.
Provide verincation
for the source
identincation made by
factor analysis
method.
Require no
assumption about the
function form of the
relationship between
wind direction and
source contribution.
Provide uncertainty
estimates.
Easy to implement.
Weaknesses
Choices for the kernel
estimator and
smoothing factor are
subjective.
Absolute source
contribution (or
fractional
contribution) may be
innuenced by other
factors besides wind
direction (e.g., wind
speed, mixing height).
Local and near-
surface wind direction
only has a limited
implication for long-
range transport.
Easy to be biased by a
small number of wind
occurrences in a
particular sector.
Work better for
stationary sources
than area or mobile
sources.
July 2009
A-229
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Receptor Model
Description
Strengths and
Weaknesses
TSA 138
TSA requires the calculation of air
parcel back trajectory, which is
often accomplished using the HY-
SPLIT model.115,139 HY-SPLIT
version 4.5 is available at
http://www.arl.noaa.gov/-
ready/hysplit4.html.
Principle
Similar to CPF, TSA clusters the measured pollutant concentration or calculated source contribution according
to the wind pattern. However, air parcel back trajectory, rather than local wind direction, is used. A back
trajectory traces the air parcel backward in time from a receptor. The initial height is often between 200 and
1000 m above ground level where the wind direction could differ from the surface wind direction substantively.
For each sample i, TSA obtains one or more trajectories and calculates their total residence time in the jth
directional sector (ny, i.e., the total number of 1 -h trajectory end points that fall into the sector). The pollutant
concentration or source contribution in the sample, Si, is then linearly apportioned into each directional sector
according to Dm and averaged over all samples to produce the directional dependent pollutant
concentration/source contribution for the period of interest:
«s =
i ^ M |
(A-13)
where N is the number of samples. Compared with CPF and NPR, TSA considers the entire air mass history
rather than just the wind direction at the receptor.
Data Needs
TSA requires the time series of pollutant concentration or source contribution at the receptor site, and back
trajectories initiated over the site during the sampling duration. Trajectory is usually calculated once every hour
so TSA is more suitable for analyzing measurements of > 1-h resolution.
Output
TSA reports the avg pollutant concentration or source contribution as a function of wind direction based on back
trajectory calculations.
Strengths
Infer the direction of
sources or factors
relative to the
sampling site.
Provide verincation
for the source
identincation made by
factor analysis
method.
Account for air mass
transport over
hundreds to
thousands of
kilometers and on the
order of several days.
Can represent plume
spread from vertical
wind shear at
different hours of day
by adjusting the initial
height of back
trajectories.
Weaknesses
Need to generate and
analyze the back
trajectory data.
Uncertainty in back
trajectory calculation
increases with its
length in time.
Source contribution
depends on not only
trajectory residence
time but also
entrainment
efnciency, dispersion,
and deposition.
Difncult to resolve the
direction of more
localized sources.
July 2009
A-230
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Receptor Model
Description
Strengths and
Weaknesses
PSCF 140
PSCF requires the calculation of
air parcel back trajectory, which
is often accomplished using the
HY-SPLIT model. 115,139 HY-
SPLIT version 4.5 is available at
http://www.arl.noaa.gov/-
ready/hysplit4.html.
Principle
Ensemble air parcel trajectory analysis refers to the statistical analysis on a group of trajectories to retrieve
useful patterns regarding the spatial distribution of sources. Uncertainties associated with individual trajectory
calculations largely cancel out for a sufncient number of trajectories or trajectory segments. As a popular
ensemble back trajectory analysis, PSCF estimates the probability that an upwind area contributes to high
pollutant concentration or source contribution. Back trajectories are nrst calculated for each sample at the
receptor site. To determine the PSCF, a study domain containing the receptor site is divided into an array of grid
cells. Trajectory residence time (the time it spends) in each grid cell is calculated for all back trajectories and for
a subset of trajectories corresponding to "high" pollutant concentration or source contribution at the site. PSCF
in cell (i,j) is then denned as:
Sum o( "htah" residence time in ell n i
PSCf *
11 Sum of aN residence time In i h|| ( , i
(A-14)
The criterion for high pollutant concentration or source contribution is critical for the PSCF calculation. The 75th
or 90th percentile of the concentration or factor is often used.,,3',4U42 Residence time can be represented by
the number of trajectory end points in a cell.
Data Needs
Similar to TSA, PSCF calculation requires the time series of pollutant concentration or source contribution at the
receptor site, and back trajectories initiated over the site during the sampling period. Trajectories should be
calculated with 1 -to 3-h segment to reduce the uncertainty from interpolation (if needed).
Output
PSCF reports the probability that an upwind area contributes to high pollutant concentrations or source
contribution at the downwind receptor site. The results are often presented as a contour plot on the map. A high
probability usually suggests potential source region (e.g., Figure 4b).
Strengths
Infer the location of
sources or factors
relative to the
sampling site.
Provide verincation
for the source
identincation made by
factor analysis
method
Account for air mass
transport over
hundreds to
thousands of
kilometers and on the
order of several days.
Resolve the spatial
distribution of source
strength
(qualitatively).
Weaknesses
Need to generate and
analyze the back
trajectory data.
Need to correct for
the central tendency
(residence time
always increases
toward the receptor
site regardless of
source contribution).
Uncertainty in back
trajectory calculation
increases with its
length in time.
Source contribution
depends on not only
trajectory residence
time but also
entrainment
efnciency, dispersion,
and deposition.
Difncult to resolve the
location of more
localized sources.
July 2009
A-231
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Receptor Model
Description
Strengths and
Weaknesses
SQTBA ,17'143
SQTBA requires the calculation of
air parcel back trajectory, which
is often accomplished using the
HY-SPLIT model. 115,139 HY-
SPLIT version 4.5 is available at
http://www.arl.noaa.gov/'
ready/hysplit4.html.
Principle
SQTBA is another type of ensemble air parcel trajectory analysis. The concept of SQTBA is to estimate the
"transport neld" for each trajectory ignoring the effects of chemical reactions and deposition. Back trajectories
are nrst calculated for each sample at the receptor site, and a study domain containing the receptor site is
divided into an array of grid cells. SQTBA assumes that the transition probability that an air parcel at (x',y',t'|,
where x' and y' are spatial coordinates and t' means time, will reach a receptor site at (x,y,t) is approximately
normally distributed along the trajectory with a standard deviation that increases linearly with time
upwind144'146, thus:
Ok. y, ?i*', y',z') ¦
1
-j asp
¦=; 11 —
ut'
-y'a i
i i
(A-15)
where (X,Y) is the coordinate of the grid center, a is the dispersion speed, and x'(t') and x' ft') represent the
trajectory. The probability neld, Q, for a given trajectory is then integrated over the upwind period, ~, to produce
a two-dimensional "natural" (nonweighted) transport neld:
y') =-
Oft, y, !fr", f, z')
dr
(A-16)
After the transport neld for each trajectory is established, they are weighted by the corresponding pollutant
concentration or source contribution at the receptor site and summed to yield the overall SQTBA neld.117
Data Needs
SQTBA requires the time series of pollutant concentration or source contribution at the receptor site, and back
trajectories initiated over the site during the sampling period. Trajectories should be calculated with 1 to 3-h
segment to reduce the uncertainty from interpolation (if needed).
Output
SQTBA put more weight on trajectories associated higher pollutant concentration or source contribution and
therefore the resulting neld may imply the major transport path.
Strengths
Imply the location of
sources or factors
relative to the
sampling site.
Account for air mass
transport over
hundreds to
thousands of
kilometers and on the
order of several days.
Resolve the spatial
distribution of source
strength
(qualitatively).
Weaknesses
Need to generate and
analyze the back
trajectory data.
Need to correct for
the central tendency
(residence time
always increases
toward the receptor
site regardless of
source contribution).
Need to estimate
dispersion velocity.
Involve complicated
calculations.
Physical meaning of
the SQTBA neld is
unclear.
Difncult to resolve the
location of more
localized sources.
July 2009
A-232
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Receptor Model
Description
Strengths and
Weaknesses
RTWC 146
RTWC requires the calculation of
air parcel back trajectory, which
is often accomplished using the
HY-SPLIT model. 115,139 HY-
SPLIT version 4.5 is available at
http://www.arl.noaa.gov/
ready/hysplit4.html
Principle
As an ensemble air parcel trajectory analysis, RTWC requires back trajectories calculated for each sample at the
receptor site, and a study domain containing the receptor site divided into an array of grid cells. RTWC assumes
that no major pollutant sources are located along "clean" (associated with low pollutant concentrations)
trajectories and that "polluted" trajectories picked up emissions along their paths. In practice, RTWC distributes
pollutant concentrations at the receptor to upwind grid cells along the back trajectories according to the
trajectory residence times in those cells.117 ,40
% = st
resident time In cell
aferage residence lime in each ceil
(A-17)
where Sk is the pollutant concentration or source contribution determined upon the arrival of trajectory k and Si>
is the redistributed pollutant concentration or source contribution for cell i upwind.
RTWC is known for the problem of "tailing effect," i.e., spurious source areas can be identined when cells are
crossed by a very small number of trajectories. Although some corrections were proposed147 these approaches
are purely empirical.
Strengths
Imply the location of
sources or factors
relative to the
sampling site.
Account for air mass
transport over
hundreds to
thousands of
kilometers and on the
order of several days.
Resolve the spatial
distribution of source
strength
(qualitatively).
Weaknesses
Need to generate and
analyze the back
trajectory data.
Need to correct for
the central tendency
and tailing effect.
The amount of
emission entrainment
should not be
proportional to the
residence time of
trajectories (so there
is no linear
relationship between
RTWC neld and
source strength).
Physical meaning of
the RTWC neld is
unclear.
Difncult to resolve the
location of more
localized sources.
113 (Pekney et al„ 2006,086115)
117 (Zhou et al„ 2004.157190)
134 (Ashbaugh, 1983.156229)
135 (Ashbaugh et al„ 1984, 045148)
136 (Henry et al.. 2002.136097)
137 (Yu et al., 2004.101779)
138 (Parekhand Husain, 1981.156840)
140 (Hopke et al., 1995.156566)
143 (Keeler and Samson, 1989,156633)
144 (Samson. 1978,156941)
145 (Samson. 1980, 073010)
146 (Stohl, 1996,157014)
147 (Cheng et al.. 1993, 052294)
Source: (Watson et al., 2008,157128)
July 2009
A-233
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
A.3.2. Source Profiles
Table A-50. Source Profiles: Part I
Element
Symbol
Motor Vehicle Exhaust ¦ Gasoline
Coal Combustion
Highway Road Dust
Unpaved Road Dust
Refinery
Weight %
Uncertainty
Weight % Uncertainty Weight % Uncertainty Weight % Uncertainty Weight % Uncertainty
Aluminum
Al
0.1
¦99
5.968
0.5247
5.729
0.4058
7.4822
0.9315
8.4853
2.3478
Antimony
Sb
0.01
¦99
0
0.0625
0
0.0335
0
0.1601
0
0.0285
Arsenic
As
0
0.0164
0
0.0123
0
0.0226
0
0.0045
Barium
Ba
0.01
¦99
1.3315
1.0801
0.1377
0.1027
0
0.5473
0
0.0979
Cadmium
Cd
0
0.0341
0
0.019
0
0.0881
0
0.0155
Calcium
Ca
0.42
¦99
3.4536
1.0411
2.5657
0.1388
2.163
1.0444
0.1236
0.056
Chloride ion
CI"
0.39
¦99
Chromium
Cr
0.01
¦99
0.0176
0.0041
0.0271
0.0023
0.0312
0.0161
0.0443
0.0127
Cobalt
Co
0
0.0432
0
0.0668
0
0.0869
0
0.0218
Copper
Cu
0.02
¦99
0.0179
0.0112
0.0219
0.0101
0.0474
0.0307
0.0299
0.0082
Total carbon
TC
4.2763
4.2579
14.3927
2.3449
4.2671
3.7193
0
1.6175
Gallium
Ga
0.014
0.014
0
0.005
0
0.0233
0
0.0059
Gold
Au
Indium
In
0
¦99
0
0.0404
0
0.022
0
0.1041
0
0.0183
Iron
Fe
1.27
¦99
2.916
0.3827
4.5713
0.2661
5.5128
2.1152
1.4708
0.2216
Lanthanum
La
0
¦99
0
0.2462
0
0.1341
0
0.6521
0
0.1146
Lead
Pb
0.08
¦99
0.068
0.0336
0.067
0.0074
0.0288
0.0284
0.0097
0.0063
Magnesium
Mg
0.14
¦99
Manganese
Mn
0.01
¦99
0.0284
0.0139
0.087
0.009
0.1372
0.0509
0.016
0.002
Mercury
Hg
0
¦99
0
0.0154
0
0.0083
0
0.0383
0
0.0073
Molybdenum
Mo
0
0.0134
0
0.0071
0
0.0331
0.0079
0.0088
Nickel
Ni
0.01
¦99
0.0072
0.0019
0.0081
0.0015
0.0091
0.0057
0.04
0.0065
Nitrate
NOs"
0.06
¦99
0
0.2116
0
0.094
0
0.6371
0
0.0772
Organic carbon OC
59.37
¦99
0
2.9263
12.7127
2.1296
4.2671
2.2637
0
1.5288
Palladium
Pd
0
0.0263
0
0.0151
0
0.0701
0
0.0127
Phosphorus
P
0.27
¦99
0.9372
0.6322
0
0.0324
0.1603
0.044
0.0689
0.0144
Potassium
K
0.01
¦99
0.4644
0.0602
2.7161
0.3069
2.8299
0.4949
0.0825
0.0234
Rubidium
Rb
0.0053
0.0043
0.0184
0.0023
0.0184
0.0093
0
0.002
Selenium
Se
0.0406
0.0407
0
0.0024
0
0.0108
0
0.0021
Silicon
Si
1.61
¦99
9.0112
0.5675
17.596
1.4183
24.2969
4.0089
17.9733
5.1834
Silver
Ag
0
0.0312
0
0.0175
0
0.083
0
0.0151
Sodium
Na
0.01
¦99
Strontium
Sr
0.1964
0.0686
0.0395
0.0078
0.0313
0.0112
0.0094
0.0031
July 2009
A-234
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Motor Vehicle Exhaust -
Gasoline Coal Combustion
Highway Road Dust
Unpaved Road Dust
Refinery
Sulfate
sor
10.1716
8.9405
1.1604 0.2003
0.8688 1.3788
2.3243
3.4523
Sulfur
S
0.37 -99
2.948
2.729
0.598 0.0509
0.2808 0.3884
0.6304
0.9627
Thallium
Tl
Tin
Sn
0
0.0527
0 0.0298
0 0.1464
0
0.0254
Titanium
Ti
0.4315
0.0651
0.3612 0.0313
0.5258 0.1289
0.6178
0.0711
Uranium
U
Vanadium
V
0
0.0734
0.0288 0.0074
0 0.0646
0.0432
0.0084
Yttrium
Y
0
0.006
0.0046 0.0012
0 0.0146
0
0.0029
Zinc
Zn
0.49 -99
0.0797
0.0341
0.0932 0.0256
0.0502 0.021
0.0166
0.003
Zirconium
Zr
0.0247
0.0043
0.0128 0.0025
0.0219 0.0168
0.0166
0.0022
Ammonium
NH4+
0.34 -99
0.3476
0.1352
0 0.025
0 0.1317
0.3281
0.5565
Sodium ion
Na+
Carbonate
C03 -
Organic carbon 0C2
II
Organic carbon 0C3
III
Organic carbon 0C4
IV
EC I
EC1
Chlorine atom
cr
0.0629
0.0221
3.4403 0.5505
0.1519 0.0755
0.0186
0.0074
EC III
EC3
EC
EC
16.44 -99
4.2763
3.0931
1.68 0.9817
0 2.9512
0
0.5283
Bromine Atom
Br
0.0147
0.0154
0.0037 0.0011
0 0.0078
0
0.0017
Organic carbon 0C1
I
EC II
EC2
Sulfur dioxide
SO?
7262.6687
7677.5681
Potassium ion
K+
0.1109
0.0571
0.2295 0.1046
0.1263 0.0744
0.0115
0.0059
Source: USA EPA Speciate database http:llwww.epa.govlttnchie1lsoftwarelspeciatelindex.html
Part II
Element
Symbol
Residential Wood Burning
Oil Combustion
DE
Fly Ash
Incinerator
Weight %
Uncert-ainty
Weight %
Uncert-ainty
Weight %
Uncert-ainty
Weight %
Uncert-ainty Weight %
Uncert-ainty
Aluminum
Al
0.0034
0.0103
0
0.05
0
0.01
1.5708
0.4755
1.15
0.83
Antimony
Sb
0.0002
0.0108
0
0.01
0
0.01
0.007
0.0218
0.01
0.15
Arsenic
As
0.0003
0.0016
0.02
0
0
0
0.001
0.0023
0
0.04
Barium
Ba
0.0093
0.0369
0
0.03
0.01
0.04
0.0303
0.0655
0.14
0.55
Cadmium
Cd
0.0013
0.0058
0
0.01
0
0.01
0
0.0154
0.01
0.08
Calcium
Ca
0.0664
0.0165
0
0.04
0.01
0.01
10.1398
1.7825
2.37
0.62
Chloride ion
ci-
0.0028
0.0004
17.5498
1.5419
July 2009
A-235
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Residential Wood Burning
Oil Combustion
DE
Fly Ash
Incinerator
Chromium
Cr
0.0003
0.0012
0.01
0.01
0
0
0.0054
0.001
0.02
0.02
Cobalt
Co
0.0005
0.0005
0.05
0.01
0
0
0.0015
0.0128
0
0.03
Copper
Cu
0.0002
0.0007
0.01
0.01
0
0
0.017
0.0013
0.08
0.1
Total carbon
TC
70.6416
7.1435
3.55
1.0855
98.94
17.859
1.4329
0.2009
55.79
27.5948
Gallium
Ga
0
0.0016
0.01
0
0
0
0.0013
0.0018
0
0.02
Gold
Au
0.0008
0.0033
Indium
In
0.0021
0.0069
0
0.01
0
0.01
0
0.0164
0.01
0.1
Iron
Fe
0.0038
0.0017
0.68
0.1
0
0
0.8306
0.059
1.72
0.31
Lanthanum
La
0.0086
0.0431
0
0.04
0.02
0.05
0.0046
0.0868
8.43
61.15
Lead
Pb
0.0031
0.0018
0
0
0
0
0.0031
0.0031
14.56
11.69
Magnesium
Mg
0.4455
0.0465
Manganese
Mn
0.003
0.0013
0
0
0
0
0.0426
0.0033
0.04
0.01
Mercury
Hg
0.0004
0.0027
0
0
0
0
0.0008
0.0025
27.63
47.27
Molybdenum
Mo
0
0.0024
0
0
0
0
0.0041
0.001
0.01
0.04
Nickel
Ni
0.0002
0.0005
2.36
0.23
0
0
0.0028
0.0004
0.01
0
Nitrate
NOs-
0.2025
0.0156
0
0
0.06
0.01
0
0.2192
5.5
4.55
Organic carbon
OC
49.4961
5.481
1.71
0.56
90.8
14.79
1.4329
0.1592
37.21
18.03
Palladium
Pd
0.0006
0.0047
0
0
0
0
0
0.0126
0.02
0.07
Phosphorus
P
0
0.0051
0
0.65
0.01
0.02
0.5808
0.2447
0.05
0.16
Potassium
K
0.6346
0.1008
0
0
0
0
24.4341
5.0076
1.28
0.86
Rubidium
Rb
0.0007
0.0007
0
0
0
0
0.0351
0.0026
0
0.02
Selenium
Se
0.0001
0.0008
0.03
0
0
0
0.0018
0.0003
0.01
0.01
Silicon
Si
0.0443
0.0167
0
0.09
0.01
0.01
4.0201
1.2886
4.42
1.82
Silver
Ag
0.0023
0.0054
0
0
0
0.01
0
0.0143
0.02
0.08
Sodium
Na
2.8137
0.2174
Strontium
Sr
0.0006
0.0009
0
0
0
0
0.0406
0.0029
0.02
0.01
Sulfate
S042"
0.4553
0.0359
25.29
5.62
0.53
0.07
8.0717
0.6409
10.46
2.6
Sulfur
S
0.1533
0.0173
16.48
1.62
0.59
0.21
2.6349
0.1873
3.16
0.63
Thallium
Tl
0.0011
0.0025
Tin
Sn
0.0006
0.0092
0
0.01
0
0.01
0.0067
0.0198
0.04
0.14
Titanium
Ti
0.001
0.012
0.01
0.01
0
0.01
0.058
0.0093
0.11
0.17
Uranium
U
0.0021
0.0052
Vanadium
V
0.0007
0.005
0.4
0.04
0
0.01
0.0038
0.011
0.01
0.07
Yttrium
Y
0.0001
0.0011
0
0
0
0
0.0013
0.0021
0
0.02
Zinc
Zn
0.0762
0.0054
0.01
0
0.02
0.02
0.031
0.0023
0.57
0.39
Zirconium
Zr
0
0.0014
0
0
0
0
0.0039
0.0008
0
0.02
Ammonium
NH4 +
0.1132
0.014
0.84
0.24
0.03
0.01
0.0234
0.022
7.41
7.81
Sodium ion
Na+
0.11
0.02
0
0.01
4.7518
0.3438
1.81
2.63
Carbonate
C03 -
0
0.0214
0.2577
0.4463
July 2009
A-236
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Residential Wood Burning
Oil Combustion
DE
Fly Ash
Incinerator
Organic carbon II
0C2
7.513
0.6675
Organic carbon III
0C3
8.9627
1.4665
Organic carbon IV
0C4
2.7683
1.1919
EC I
EC1
20.342
2.9324
Chlorine atom
CI'
0.2874
0.0404
0.05
0.01
0.03
0.01
27.5797
8.1193
6.35 10.46
EC III
EC3
2.2878
0.4252
EC
EC
21.1455
4.5813
1.84
0.93
8.14
10.01
0
0.1227
18.58 20.89
Bromine Atom
Br
0.0029
0.0011
0
0
0
0
0.0441
0.0032
0.19 0.3
Organic carbon I
0C1
25.1452
4.6648
EC II
EC2
2.9362
1.2422
Sulfur dioxide
SO?
Potassium ion
K+
0.5208
0.0795
0.01
0.01
0
0.01
14.5473
1.3393
1.01 0.42
Source: U.S. EPA SPECIATE database http:llwww.epa.govlttnchie1lsoftwarelspeciatelindex.html
A.3.3. Receptor Model Results
Table A-51. PM10 receptor model results
% Contribution
Sampling Site
Wood
Smoke
Diesel
Gasoline
Vehicles
Natural Gas
Combustion
Vegetative
Detritus
Tire Wear
Debris
Total %
Allocated
Apline, CA, 1994-1995
15.00
33.19
46.46
5.31
6.91
99.955752
Apline, CA, 1995
9.92
58.78
11.47
19.63
9.43
99.795918
Apline, CA, 1995
10.97
65.64
10.81
12.66
5.31
100.07722
Atascadero, CA, 1994-1995
44.22
22.16
26.44
99.733333
Atascadero, CA, 1995
21.36
38.99
12.41
17.89
100.08772
Atascadero, CA, 1995
73.45
18.11
3.14
100.01241
Lake Arrowhead, CA, 1994-1995
6.86
46.55
33.92
2.73
9.85
20.42
99.896907
Lake Arrowhead, CA, 1995
4.85
65.20
7.40
4.95
17.65
100.04902
Lake Arrowhead, CA, 1995
9.91
38.90
46.70
0.79
3.66
28.01
99.955947
Lake Elsinore, CA, 1994-1995
12.72
44.01
18.61
4.21
9.78
99.967638
Lake Elsinore, CA, 1995
17.13
74.72
0.26
7.81
29.17
99.924528
Lake Elsinore, CA, 19952
6.84
38.48
10.85
0.21
15.55
11.93
99.946809
Lancaster, CA, 1994-1995
22.49
43.14
20.56
0.45
3.73
26.38
100.14006
Lancaster, CA, 1995
3.69
46.18
12.66
0.20
8.21
100.09967
Lancaster, CA, 1995
34.89
37.30
7.33
0.61
7.78
99.839228
Lompoc, CA, 1994-1995
18.16
49.65
5.89
26.00
100.07092
Lompoc, CA, 1995
13.09
51.27
14.73
20.73
14.11
99.818182
July 2009
A-237
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
% Contribution
Lompoc, CA, 1995
79.42
10.19
10.87
16.61
100.48077
Long Beach, CA, 1994-1995
10.12
43.24
16.49
0.13
3.97
19.52
99.955423
Long Beach, CA, 1995
2.38
70.25
5.47
0.86
6.79
15.71
99.865643
Long Beach, CA, 1995
14.32
56.80
6.15
0.72
5.34
9.85
99.939832
Mira Loma, CA, 1994-1995
4.68
48.87
18.10
8.82
20.31
100
Mira Loma, CA, 1995
5.20
53.72
6.65
18.79
19.06
100.07092
Mira Loma, CA, 1995
27.97
41.88
8.87
11.50
20.17
100.07519
Riverside, CA, 1994-1995
14.14
46.67
12.03
6.83
99.972222
Riverside, CA, 1995
6.20
52.15
7.93
0.16
14.54
7.85
100.0409
Riverside, CA, 1995
25.28
47.65
6.91
8.15
100
San Dimas, CA, 1995
7.62
71.35
4.87
0.15
8.35
12.78
100.17308
San Dimas, CA, 1995
22.01
61.34
4.48
0.23
3.70
15.05
99.919463
Santa Maria, CA, 1994-1995
18.66
23.99
22.03
5.58
14.70
100.14493
Santa Maria, CA, 1995
12.94
52.57
11.87
0.27
9.63
11.25
100.05348
Santa Maria, CA, 1995
12.24
48.13
10.79
0.47
18.04
9.81
104.71963
Upland, CA, 1994-1995
20.33
46.39
14.08
4.49
100
Upland, CA, 1995
7.33
68.69
3.50
0.17
9.19
100.12891
Upland, CA, 1995
28.10
46.52
4.90
0.33
10.30
99.952774
Source: Manchester-Neesvig et al. (2003, 098102)
Table A-52. PM2.5 receptor model results
Sampling Site
Measured PM2.5
Concentration
Vegetative
Burning
R°aSoMUSt ,NH4'2S°4 NH4N03 NaCL Tailpipe
Brake
Wear
Total %
Allocated
Albany, NY 2000-2004
34.9
7.60
11.70 2.70
4.90
11.70
2.90
118.91
Birmingham, AL, 2000-2004
24.1
3.90
8.40 3.70
2.70
0.10
5.70
101.66
Houston, TX, 2000-2004
17.6
3.10
6.90 1.60
2.50
0.10
3.80
106.25
Long Beach, CA, 2000-2004
46.8
4.60
9.60 2.10
18.90
0.80
6.50
3.50
98.29
Source: Abu-Allaban et al. (2007,098575)
July 2009
A-238
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
A.4. Exposure Assessment
A.4.1. Exposure Assessment Study Findings
Table A-53. Exposure Assessment Study Summaries
Abou Chakra et al. (2007,098819)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Component(s)
Primary Findings
Experimental, in vitro. HeLa cells incubated with organic extracts of personal PMio and PM2.6 samples
NR
3 French metropolitan areas (Paris, Rouen, Strasbourg) with varying air quality and emission sources
Individuals from urban areas with varying air pollution levels and emissions sources
Children ages 6-13. Ages of adults not given
NR
Harvard multi-pollutant Chempass personal exposure sampler placed in backpacks with BGI pump operating at 1.8 l/min.
PM10, PM2.6
NR
NR
Organic extracts of PM 10, organic extracts of PM2.6
Genotoxic effects were stronger for organic extracts of PM2.6 than for PM 10 and greater in winter than summer. Greater effects for winter
samples may be attributed to elevated winter PAH concentrations.
Abu-Allaban et al. (2004,156187)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Component(s)
Primary Findings
Exposure assessment of real world motor vehicle emissions
May 18-22,1999
Tuscarosa Mountain Tunnel, Pennsylvania Turnpike
Highway tunnel
No personal exposure assessment was conducted.
0.01-0.5 fjm
NR
NR
Monitoring sessions with the highest fraction heavy-duty vehicles had the highest particle concentrations; Observed particle size distribution
was a combination of 2 bimodal log-normal distributions a dominant nucleation mode (86% of area under the curve).
Adar et al. (2007,098635)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Periods
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Cohort
March 2002-June 2002
St. Louis, Missouri
Senior citizens exposed to traffic-related PM
60
NR
Samples of FeNO were collected between 8:00 and 9:00 a.m. on the mornings before and after each trip. In the hours surrounding these
samples, group-level measurements of particle concentrations also were collected using several continuous instruments installed on two
portable carts. These carts were first positioned in a central location inside the participants' living facilities 24-h before each trip. The carts
remained at the facilities until it was time for the trips, at which point they followed the participants from the health testing room, onto the
bus, to the group activity, and to lunch. After the trip home aboard the bus, the carts were returned to the central location in the living
facility where they remained until the conclusion of the health testing on the following morning. Continuous measurements of ambient
particles and gases also were collected from a central monitoring station in East St. Louis, Illinois.; Specifics-; Two portable carts containing
continuous air pollution monitors were used to measure group-level micro-environmental exposures to traffic related pollutants, including fine
particulate mass (<2.5 |Jm aerodynamic diameter; PM2.6), BC, and size-specific particle counts. PM2.6 concentrations were measured
continuously using a DustTrak aerosol monitor model 8520 with a Nafion diffusion dryer. Integrated samples of PM2.6 mass also were
collected using a Harvard Impactor for daily calibration of the trip and facility (missing items?)
Continuous BC concentrations were measured using a portable aethalometerwith a 2.5-|Jm impaction inlet. Particle counts were measured
using a model CI500 optical particle counter with a modified flow rate of 0.1 cubic feet per minute.
NR
PM2.6
July 2009
A-239
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Ambient Size PM2.6; PMio
Component(s) BC; Pollen and Mold also assessed
Primary Findings Fine particle exposures resulted in increased levels of FeNO in elderly adults, suggestive of increased airway inflammation. These associations
were best assessed by microenvironmental exposure measurements during periods of high personal particle exposures.In pre-trip samples,
both microenvironmental and ambient exposures to fine particles were positively associated with FeNO. For example, an interquartile
increase of 4/yglm3 in the daily microenvironmental PM2.6 concentration was associated with a 13% [95% CI: 2-24) increase in FeNO. After
the trips, however, FeNO concentrations were associated predominantly with microenvironmental exposures, with significant associations
for concentrations measured throughout the whole day. Associations with exposures during the trip also were strong and statistically
significant with a 24% (95% CI: 15-34) increase in FeNO predicted per interquartile increase of 9 //gfnv1 in PM2.6. Although pre-trip findings
were generally robust and the post-trip findings were generally robust, the post-trip findings were sensitive to several influential days.
Adgate et al. (2002, 030676)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Component(s)
Primary Findings
Comparison of outdoor, indoor and personal PM2.6 in three communities.
April-June, June-August, September-November, 1999
Battle Creek, East St. Paul, and Phillips, Minnesota, constituting the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area.
adults in urban areas
mean age 42 ±10, range 24-64 yr
No
Inertial impactors (PEM) in a foam-insulated bag with shoulder strap with the inlet mounted on the front.
PM2.6
PM2.6
PM2.6
NR
The relative level of concentrations report in other studies was duplicated. Outdoor < indoor < personal. On days with paired samples
(n - 29), outdoor concentrations were significantly lower (mean difference 2.9 /yglm3, p - 0.026) than outdoor at home.
Adgate etal. (2007,156196)
Study Design NR
Period 1999-; April 26-June 20, June 21 -August 11, September 23-November 21
Location Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area
Population NR
Indoor Source Cigarette smoke, resuspension of house dust from carpets, furniture and clothes, and emissions from stoves and kerosene heaters (Leaderer
et al., 1993: Ferro et al., 2004).
Personal Method Personal monitoring was conducted using a and consisted of two consecutive days, and was conducted so that the two 24-h averages
matched indoor (I) and personal (P) measurements were collected in concert with 0 samples in each community. Gravimetric concentrations
for P and I were collected using inertial impactor environmental monitoring inlets and air sampling pumps. To obtain I measurements,
monitors were placed inside each residence in a room where the participants reported spending the most waking hours. P measurements
were obtained by carrying personal pumps in small bags.: Outdoor central site samples (0) were collected near the approximate geographic
center of each neighborhood and monitors ran from midnight to midnight for two consecutive 24-h periods, followed by a day to change
filters. Gravimetric 0 PM2.6 concentrations were obtained using a federal reference method sampler.
Personal Size PM2.B-broken down into TE
Microenvironment Size PM2.B-broken down into TE
Ambient Size PM2.B-broken down into TE
Component(s) Ag, A I, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cs, Cu, Fe, K, La, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Pb, S, Sb, Sc, Ti, Tl, V, Zn
Primary Findings The relationships among P, I, and 0 concentrations varied across TEs. Unadjusted mixed-model results demonstrated that 0 monitors are
more likely to underestimate than overestimate exposure to many of the TEs that are suspected to play a role in the causation of air
pollution related health effects. These data also support the conclusion that TE exposures are more likely to be underestimated in the lower
income and centrally located PHI community than in the comparatively higher income BC K community. Within the limits of statistical power
for this sample size, the adjusted models indicated clear seasonal and community related effects that should be incorporated in long-term
exposure estimates for this population.
Adgate etal. (2003,040341)
Study Design Time-series epidemiologic study
Period April-November 1999: spring: 26 April-20 June: summer: 21 June-11 August: fall: 23 September-21 November
Location Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota
Population Healthy non-smoking results
Age Groups 24-64 yr (mean age 42 ± 10)
Indoor Source NR
July 2009
A-240
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Component(s)
Primary Findings
Personal and indoor gravimetric PM concentrations were collected using PM2.6 inertial impactor environmental monitoring inlets and air
sampling pumps. Monitors were placed inside each participant's residence in the room where he/she reported spending the majority of their
waking hours to obtain indoor (I) measurements. Participants also carried personal pumps in small bags to obtain personal (P) measurements.
Start times for indoor and personal monitors were always within a few minutes of each other. Gravimetric outdoor (0) and central site PM2.6
concentrations were obtained using a federal reference method sampler and EPA site requirements for ambient sampling. Gravometric
samples were collected near the approximate geographic center of each neighborhood, and monitors ran from midnight to midnight for 2
consecutive 24-h periods, followed by a day to change filters.
Personal (P) PM2.6 concentrations were higher than indoor (I) concentrations, which were higher than outdoor (0) concentrations. In healthy
non smoking adults, moderate median PI; modest median 10; and minimal median PO longitudinal correlation coefficients were observed for
PM2.6 measurements. A sensitivity analysis indicated that correlations did not increase if the days with exposures to environmental tobacco
smoke or occupational exposures were excluded. In the sample population neither P nor I monitors provided a highly correlated estimate of
exposure to 0 PM2.6 over time. These results suggest that the studies showing relatively strong longitudinal correlation coefficients between
P and 0 PM2.E for individuals sensitive to air pollution health effects do not necessarily predict exposure to PM2.6 in the general population.
Alander etal. (2004,055650)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Component(s)
Primary Findings
Exposure assessment, characterization of effects of fuel reformulation, engine design, and exhaust after-treatment on PM emissions
NR
Laboratory
Diesel-powered passenger cars of different engine types and different formulations of diesel fuel
No personal exposure assessment was conducted
NR
Total carbon, organic carbon, elemental carbon, sulfate, nitrate, chloride
Reformulated low sulfur diesel fuel produced 40% less total carbon mass compared to standard fuel. Organic carbon constituted 27-61%
carbon mass from an indirect ignition engine. Low sulfur fuel reduced organic carbon mass by 10-55%, depending on engine.
Allen et al. (2003,053578)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Component(s)
Primary Findings
Use of continuous light scattering data to separate indoor PM into indoor- and outdoor-generated components to enhance knowledge of the
outdoor contribution to total indoor and personal PM exposures.
November 1999-May 2001
Seattle, WA
Elderly people and children spending most of their time (up tp 70%) indoors.; The study included healthy elderly subjects, elderly with COPD
and coronary heart disease (CHD), and child subjects with asthma.
Age n; 0-29 25; 30-59 36; > 60 22; unknown 2
Suggested (not identified)
NR. Indoor and outdoor sampling conducted
NR
PM2.6
PM2.6
Sulfur
A recursive mass balance model can be successfully used to attribute indoor PM to its outdoor and indoor components and to estimate an avg
P, a, k, and NH4+ for each residence.
Allen et al. (2007,154226)
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Component(s)
Heating season
Seattle, WA
October-February; Non-heating season March-September; (Year not specified)
Indoor and outdoor PM2.6 was measured using a 10-lfmin single-stage Harvard Impactor (HI) with 37-mm Teflon filters. The relationship
between particle mass concentration and light scattering coefficient (bsp) was also measured on a continuous basis indoors and outdoors
using nephelometers (model 902 and 903).
NR
PM2.6
PM2.6
Sulfur (measured by XRF)
July 2009
A-241
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Primary Findings The authors showed that RM can reliably estimate Fint. Simulation results suggest that the RM Fuestimates are minimally impacted by
measurement error. In addition, the average light scattering response per unit mass concentration was greater indoors than outdoors.
Results show that the RM method is unable to provide satisfactory estimates of the individual components of Fm. Iliu et ndividual homes
vary in their infiltration efficiencies, thereby contributing to exposure misclassification in epidemiologic studies that assign exposures using
ambient monitoring data. This variation across homes indicates the need for home-specific estimation methods, such as RM or sulfur tracer,
instead of techniques that give average estimates of infiltration across homes.
Allen et al. (2007,156207)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Component(s)
Primary Findings
Primarily a study of exposure to indoor PBDE congeners.
Jan-Mar 2006
Greater Boston area, Massachusetts
Urban dwellers
No particulate sampled
No particulate sampled
No particulate sampled
Polybrominated diphenyls (PBDEs), divided into 13 congeners and total BDE (SBDE), which includes both vapor and particulate phase.
Total personal air concentrations (particulate ± vapor) were 469 pg/m3 for non-209 BDEs and 174 pg/m3 for BDE 209, significantly higher
than bedroom and main living room concentrations (p - 0.01). The ratio of personal air to room air increased from 1 for vapor-phase
congeners to 4 for fully particulate-bound congeners, indicating a personal cloud effect.
Andresen et al. (2005,156216)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Component(s)
Primary Findings
Residential exposure assessment personal and indoor
June-July 2002 to December 2002
Mysore, India
Women working at home, non-smoking, and primary household cook
18-50 yr old
Cooking fuel source
PM2.6 gravimetric filter measurement
PM2.6
Using kerosene for cooking was associated with higher personal PM2.B exposure in both winter and summer compared to LPG.; Kerosene use
during winter was associated with higher personal PM2.6 compared to summer.; LPG use was associated with comparable personal PM2.6
across both seasons.; Indoor PM2.6 measurements followed similar patterns by fuel-type and season.; Socioeconomic status, age, season,
and income were significant predictors of cooking fuel choice.
Annesi-Maesano et al. (2007,093180)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Component(s)
Primary Findings
Population based
March 1999 to October 2000
Bordeaux, France; Clermont-Ferrand, France; Creteil, France; Marseille, France; Strasbourg, France; Reims, France
School children
10.4 ± 0.7 yr
NR
PM2.E was monitored simultaneously in both schoolyards (proximity level) and fixed-site monitoring stations (city level) using 4L/min battery
operated pumps attached to polyethylene filter sampling cartridges.
NR
NR
PM2.6
NR
Results show an increased risk for EIB and flexural dermatitis at the period of the survey, past year atopic asthma and SPT positivity to
indoor allergens in children exposed to high levels of traffic-related air pollution (PM2.6 concentrations exceeding 10 //gfnv1]. Population based
findings are also consistent with experimental data that have demonstrated that inhalation of traffic-related air pollutants either individually
or in combination, can enhance the immune responses and airway response to inhaled allergens, such as pollens or house dust mites, in
atopic subjects.
Balakrishnan et al. (2002,156247)
Study Design Exposure assessment
Period July-December 1999 (20 weeks)
Location 50 villages, Tamil Nadu, India
Population Men and women in rural households; children exempt
July 2009
A-242
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Component(s)
Primary Findings
All, children exempt
Yes
Personal sampler for cooks during cooking time
Respirable Particulates (based on NIOSH protocol)
Respirable Particulates (based on NIOSH protocol)
Respirable Particulates (based on NIOSH protocol)
NR
Fuel type, type and location of the kitchen, and the time spent near the kitchen while cooking are the most important determinants of
exposure across rural households.
Balasubramanian and Lee (2007,156248)
Study Design Case study of 3 rooms of 1 flat on the 8th floor, and "outside the home.'
May 12-23,2004
Singapore
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Primary Findings
Residents of an urban area in a densely populated country.
NR
Time-activity logs identified tobacco smoking, cooking, household cleaning and general resident movements.
NR
NR
PM2.6
PM2.6
Indoor/outdoor ratios (I/O) suggest that chemicals such as chloride, sodium aluminum, cobalt, copper, iron, manganese, titanium vanadium,
zinc, elemental carbon were derived from the migration of outdoor particles (I/O <1 or ~ 1).
Barn etal. (2008,156252)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Component(s)
Primary Findings
Measure indoor infiltration factor (FiaC) of PM2.6 from forest fires/wood smoke, effectiveness of high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter
air cleaners in reducing indoor PM2.6, and to analyze the home determinants of Fia and air cleaner effectiveness (ACE).
2004-2005 (summer 2004 and 2005, winter 2004)
British Columbia, Canada
homes affected by either forest fire smoke or residential wood smoke
Pdr (Personal Data Ram) for ambient air sampling
Indoor home PM2.6
NR
Outdoor home PM2.6
NR
Use of HEPA filter air cleaners can dramatically reduce indoor PM2.6 concentrations. Number of windows and season predict indoor
infiltration Fia (p< 0.001).
Baxter et al. (2007, 092726)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Part of a prospective birth cohort study performed by the Asthma Coalition for Community, Environment, and Social Stress
(ACCESS)
2003-2005. Non-heating season- May to October; Heating season- December to March
Boston (urban)
Lower socio-economic status (SES) households
NR
NR
PM2.5 samples were collected with Harvard personal environmental monitors (PEM).; NO concentrations were measured using
Yanagisawa passive filter badges.
NR
PM2.5
PM2.5
EC
The authors' regression models indicated that PM2.5 was influenced less by local traffic but had significant indoor sources, while EC
was associated with local traffic and NO2 was associated with both traffic and indoor sources. However, local traffic was found to be
a larger contributor to indoor NO2 where traffic density is high and windows are opened, whereas indoor sources are a larger
contributor when traffic density is low or windows are closed. Similarly, traffic contributed up to 0.2 mg/m3 to indoor EC for homes
with open windows, with an insignificant contribution for homes where windows were closed.; Comparing models based on p-values
and using a Bayesian approach yielded similar results, with traffic density volume within a 50m buffer of a home and distance from
a designated truck route as important contributors to indoor levels of NO2 and EC, respectively. However, results from the Bayesian
approach also suggested a high degree of uncertainty in selecting the best model. The authors concluded that by utilizing public
databases and focused questionnaire data they could identify important predictors of indoor concentrations for multiple air
pollutants in a high-risk population.
July 2009
A-243
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Baxter et al. (2007, 092725)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Copollutant(s)
Primary Findings
Simultaneous indoor and outdoor samples taken in 43 low SES homes in heating and non-heating seasons. Homes were selected
from a prospective birth cohort study of asthma etiology (n = 25). Non-cohort homes were in similar neighborhoods (n = 18).
2003-2005
Boston, Massachusetts
Lower SES populations in urban areas
Home type, year built, tobacco smoke, opening windows, time spent cooking, use of candles or air freshener, cleaning activities, air
conditioner use.
NR
NR
PM2.5
NR
EC (rrv1 x 10-5); Ca (ng/m3); Fe (ng/m3); K (ng/m3); Si (ng/m3); Na (ng/m3); CI (ng/m3); Zn (ng/m3); S (ng/m3); V (ng/m3)
NO2
The effect of Indoor Sources may be more pronounced in high-density multi-unit dwellings. Cooking times, gas stoves, occupant
density and humidifiers contributed to indoor pollutants.
BeruBeetal. (2004,189731)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
6 homes in Wales and Cornwall were monitored four times per year, inside samples in the living areas and outside the home.
NR but < 2003
Wales and Cornwall, UK
urban, suburban, and rural homes
Tobacco smoke, pets, cleaning, traffic load
NR
NR
PM10 mass
NR
NR
There are greater masses of PM10 indoors, and that the composition of the indoor PM10 is controlled by outdoor sources and to a
lesser extent by indoor anthropogenic activities, except in the presence of tobacco smokers. The indoor and outdoor PM10 collected
was characterized as being a heterogeneous mixture of particles (soot, fibers, sea salt, smelter, gypsum, pollen and fungal spores).
Branis et al. (2005,156290)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Human exposure assessment in a university lecture hall
Oct. 8, 2001-Nov. 11,2001
Prague, Czech Republic
University students
NR
Presence of people identified as a source of course (PM2.5-10) particles; outdoor air identified as a source of indoor fine particles
(PMtoand PM2.5)
Harvard impactors with membrane Teflon filters
PM1, PM2.5, PM10
PM1, PM2.5, PM10
PM10
NR
Presence of people is an important source of coarse particles indoors; Outdoor air may be an important source of fine indoor
particles
Brauer et al. (2006, 090757)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Copollutant(s)
Primary Findings
Cohort study of otitis media and traffic related air pollution
Dec. 1997-Jan 1999
Netherlands and Munich, Germany
Children living near high traffic roads
0-2 yr
Environmental tobacco smoke at home, gas cooking, indoor moulds and dampness, number of siblings, breast-feeding, and pets
indoor.
NR
NR
NR
PM2.5; Light absorbing carbon
Light absorbing carbon
NO2
These findings indicate an association between exposure to traffic-related air pollutants and the incidence of otitis media.
July 2009
A-244
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Brauer et al. (2007, 090691)
Study Design
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Copollutant(s)
Primary Findings
Cohort study from birth to 5 yr Exposure obtained from stationery monitors identified as closest to birth home.
The Netherlands
Children
0-5 yr
NR
NR
NR
PM2.5 and Soot/filter absorbance
NO2
Adjusted odds ratios for wheeze, doctor-diagnosed asthma, ENT infections and flu indicated positive associations with air pollution.
No associations for eczema and bronchitis. Findings at age 4 confirm findings at age 2 in the cohort.
Brunekreef et al. (2005, 090486)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Exposure assessment
Winter and spring 1998-1999
Amsterdam and Helsinki
Elderly
50-84 yr
NR
Amsterdam Gillian with made to fit bags with belt withGK2.05 cyclone samplers 4L/min; Helsinki BGI with shoulder strap or
backpack with GK2.05 cyclone samplers 4L/min
PM2.5
PM2.5
PM2.5
Sulfate
In both cities personal and indoor PM2.5 were lower than highly correlated with outdoor concentrations. For most elements, personal
and indoor concentrations were also highly correlated with outdoor concentrations.
Cao et al. (2005,156321)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Case study: 2 roadside homes (RS), 2 urban (UR), 2 rural (RU).
March-April 2004
Hong Kong, China
All
NR
NR
PM2.5
PM2.5
OC, EC
PM2.5 concentrations were roadside >urban >rural. Indoor PM2.5 has an avg of 24.4-36.8% OC and 3.6-6.9% EC.
Chakrabarti etal. (2004,147867)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
This is an evaluation of the active-flow pDR for PM2.5 against the D Attenuation Monitor (BAM) and the gravimetric pDR
NR
Los Angeles, California
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
PM2.5
NR
The personal pDR can be deployed as a personal monitor. The PM2.5 cyclone prevents larger particles from biasing the results.
Along with a wearable humidity and temperature monitor for correcting the readings, the results correlate highly with other methods.
The samples can be taken every 15 min to provide a more accurate picture of personal exposure in various settings.
Chang etal. (2007,156331)
Study Design Panel study
Period 2003 to 2005
Location Taipei County, Taipei
Population Elderly people
July 2009
A-245
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
53-75yr (median = 66.2 ± 6.5)
NR
Personal exposures to PM were measured simultaneously with ECG in real-time for twenty-four hours by using a personal dust
monitor (DUSTcheck portable dust monitor, model 1.108) which recorded 1-min mass concentrations of PMi, PM2.5, and PM10, as
well as ambient temperature and relative humidity. To measure subjects' personal PM exposures, all subjects were instructed to
keep the DUSTt check monitor with them at all times.; Details were reported previously (Chuang et al. 2005)
PM10; PM2.5-10; PM2.5; PM1-2.5; PM1
NR
NR
NR
Short-term and medium-term PM exposures were associated with the reduction of HRV in the elderly, with stronger effects found for
coarse particles in comparison with particles of other size ranges. In general, increase was observed with PM for H and the LF/HF
ratio, where the strongest significant effects on H were found at short-term intervals (1 -4 h) for PM2.5-10 and at medium-term duration
(5-8 h) for particles smaller than 2.5 Im in diameter. On the other hand, among the different-sized particles, PM2.5-10 exposures
showed the strongest significant association with decreases in time-domain (SDNN, r- MSSD) and frequency-domain parameters
(LF, HF) in most averaging Periods. Especially for the longer duration of 5-8 h, the strongest association was found for the 6-h
moving average of PM2.5-10 exposures.
Charron et al. (2007,156333)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Copollutant(s)
Primary Flndlng(s)
Environmental PM exposure assessment. In this article, a total of 185 days with daily PM10 concentrations exceeding the limit value
of 50 pg/m3 measured between January 2002 and December 2004 are discussed.
January 2002 and December 2004
Marylebone Road, Westminster, London
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
PM2.5 PM10
NO3-; SO42-; OC; EC
NOx; CO
The regional background was the largest contributor to PM10 concentrations measured at Marylebone Road between January 2002
and December 2004
Chillrud etal. (2004,
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
054799)
Repeated measures on a cohort of high school students in New York City
Summer and winter of 1999 (eight weeks each)
Manhattan, Bronx, Queens, Brooklyn, NY
Persons traveling the subway
14-18 yr
No
Sampling packs carried by subjects
PM2.5
PM2.5; Home indoor and home outdoor
PM2.5. Urban fixed-site and upwind fixed site operated for three consecutive 48-h periods each week.
Elemental iron, manganese, and chromium are reported in this study out of 28 elements sampled.
Personal samples had significantly higher concentration of iron, manganese, and chromium than home indoor and ambient samples.
The ratios of Fe (ng/pg of PM2.5) vs Mn (pg/pg PM2.5) showed personal samples to be twice the ratio for crustal material. Similarly
for the Cr/Mn ratio. The ratios and strong correlations between pairs of elements suggested steel dust as the source. Time-activity
data suggested subways as a source of the elevated personal metal levels.
Chuang et al. (2005,087989)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Panel Study
Taipei, Taiwan
Individuals with CHD, prehypertension, and hypertension
No
Yes, a technician carrying a DUSTcheck; monitor accompanied each patient
PMo.3-1.Ol PM1.0-2.5; PM2.5-10
NR
NR
NR
HRV reduction in susceptible population was associated with PM0.3-1.0 but was not; associated with either PM1.0-2.5 or PM2.5-10.;
PM0.3-1.0 exposures at 1- to 4-h moving averages were associated with SDNN and r-MSSD in both cardiac and hypertensive;
patients. For an interquartile increase in PM0.3-1.0, there were 1.49-4.88% decreases in SDNN and 2.73-8.25% decreases in r-
July 2009
A-246
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
MSSD. PMo.3-1.0 exposures were also associated with decreases in LF; and HF for hypertensive patients at 1- to 3-h moving
averages except for cardiac patients at moving averages of 2 or 3 h.
Cohen at al (2004,056909)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Field evaluation study to test performance of new technology to measure number concentration of acidic ultrafine particles (UFP)
July 1999-September 2000
New York City and nearby suburban location
4 outdoor rural sites and 1 indoor rural site (cafeteria) in Tuxedo, NY. 1 suburban residential site in Newburgh, NY. 1 outdoor urban
site in New York City
NR
NR
No personal exposure assessment was conducted.
NR
Ultrafine (UFP)
Ultrafine (UFP)
Acidic UFP, Hydrogen ions, sulfate ions, ammonium ions
Iron nanofilm detectors can be used with confidence under a range of ambient conditions. Concentrations of UFP determined by
atomic force microscopy analysis of detectors in MOI-EAS and UDM appeared to underestimate number concentrations of total
UFP and [missing items?]
Connell et al. (2005,089458)
Study Design Times-series
Period May 2000-May 2002
Location Steubenville, Ohio = ST; Saint Vincent College, Latrobe, PA (eastern site) = E; Tomlinson Run State Park, New Manchester, WV
(northern site) = N; Hopedale, OH (western site) = W; Jesuit Univ., Wheeling, WV (southern site) = S
Population NR
Age Groups No
Indoor Source NR
Personal Method NR
Personal Size NR
Ambient Size PM10 & PM2.5
Components) Ammonium, sulfate, nitrate, chloride, and 21 elements, elemental carbon and organic carbon.
Copollutant(s) SOx, NOx, Co, and O3.
Primary Findings The average PM2.5 in Steubenville was 18.4 pg/m3, 3.4 pg/m3 above the annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
Conner and Williams (2004,156364)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Primary Finding(s)
This is part of the EPA Baltimore PM Study of the Elderly.
July-August, 1998
Towson, Maryland
65+ adults
65+yr
Personal sampling devices (PEM)
PM2.5
PM2.5
NR
NR
A greater variety of particles was observed in the personal samples compared to the fixed-location apartment samples.
Cortez-Lugo et al. (2008,156368)
Study Design Cohort
Period Feb-Nov 2000
Location Mexico City, Mexico
Population Ambulatory adults with moderate to severe COPD, active smokers excluded
Age Groups Adults
Indoor Source carpeting, aerosol sprays used, boiler use and location, animals, mold, tobacco smoking, windows closed
Personal Method Personal pumps with 37-mm TefIon filters, flow rate 4 l/min in a bag with shoulder strap. The impactor was near the breathing zone
Personal Size PM2.5
Microenvironment Size PM2.5&PM10
Ambient Size PM2.5&PM10
Components) NR
Primary Findings Indoor PM2.5 concentrations explained 40% of the variability of personal exposure.; The best predictors of personal exposure were
indoor contact with animals (12%, 1 -25), mold (27%, 11 -48), being present during cooking (27,12-43), and aerosol use (17%, 4-
31).
July 2009 A-247 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Crist et al. (2008,156372)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Indoor, outdoor, and personal monitoring
January 1999-August 2000
Ohio
Fourth & fifth-grade children
9-11 yr old
Filter, portable pump
Filter, PM2.5
Indoor school; Filter, PM2.5
Outdoor school; Filter, PM2.5
NR
Cyrys etal. (2003, 042232)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Exposure assessment, source apportionment of urban aerosol
September 1,1995-December 21,1998
Erfurt, Germany
Urban Populations
NR
NR
No personal exposure assessment was conducted
NR
NR
Ultrafine (UFP, 0.01-2.5 pm), PM2.5, PM10
Si, Al, Ti, Ca, Fe, Cr, Mg, Na, K, Mn, Ni, V, Co, Sc, Cu, Zn, Pb, Br, S
Low correlation between UFP number concentration and fine particle mass and differences in their diurnal patterns suggest that
different sources contribute to particles in the 2 size ranges. Elements Si, Al, Ti and Ca were highly correlated and had low e
Cyrys et al. (2006,156376)
Study Design
Period
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Exposure assessment, evaluation of sampling methodologies
Sept 1 2000-August 31, 2001
Indoor
No personal monitoring was conducted
NR
NR
NR
Restricted sampling scheme (covering 23% of study period) was able to estimate reliable annual and winter averages in Erfurt,
Germany. Daily PM2.5 means measured by EPA-WINS were higher than those measured by HI, but differences between samplers
were small.
Delfina et al. (2004)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Copollutant(s)
Primary Findings
Panel study with repeated measures
Sep-Oct 1999 or Apr-Jun 2000
Alpine, California
Children
9-19 yr
No
Personal dataRAM (pDR) carried at waist level using a fanny pack, shoulder harness, or vest.
PM2.5 (approximate); 0.1-10 range
PM10 & PM2.5; measured immediately outside the house and in the living room of the home.
PM10
O3 and NO2 measured at central site
Percent predicted FEV1 was inversely associated with personal exposure to fine particles. Also with indoor, outdoor and central site
gravimetric PM2.4, PM10, and with hourly TEOM PM10.
Delfino etal. (2006,090745)
Study Design Cohort. Measured daily expired NO (FeNO)
Period Aug-Dec 2003
Location Riverside and Whittier, California
Population Children with asthma exacerbations in previous 12 months, non-smokers, non-smoking households
Age Groups 9-18 yr
Indoor Source No
July 2009
A-248
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Personal Method Wore a backpack during waking hours for PM2.5, EC and OC, NO2, temperature, and relative humidity. Exhaled air collected in Mylar
bags to analyze for NO.
24-h PM2.5; 1 -h max PM2.5; 8-h max PM2.5; 24-h NO2
NR
24-h PM2.5; 24-h PM10; 8-h max O3; 8-h max NO2; 24-h NO2; 8-h max CO
24-h PM2.5 EC; 24-h PM2.5 OC
PM associations with airway inflammation in asthmatics may be missed using ambient particle mass.; The strongest positive
associations were between eNO and 2-day avg pollutant concentrations. Per IQR increases 1.1 ppb FeNO/24 pg/m3 personal
PM2.5.; 0.7 ppb FeNO/O.6 pg/m3 personal EC; 1.6 ppb FeNO /17 ppb personal NO2; Ambient PM2.5 and personal and ambient EC
were significant only when subjects were taking inhaled corticosteroids.; Subjects taking both inhaled steroids and antileukotrienes
had no significant associations.; Distributed lag models showed personal PM2.5 in the preceding 5 h was associated with FeNO.
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Demokritou et al. (2002,156393)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Exposure assessment, evaluation of newly developed personal cascase impactor
NR
Laboratory chamber
Newly developed personal PM sampler
NR
NR
No personal exposure assessment was conducted
NR
9.6-20 pm, 2.6-9.6 pm, 1.0-2.6, 0.5-1.0
NR
NR
The first stage showed excellent separation of particles larger than 9.6 pm from the airstream. In the second stage, for particles
above 4.0 pm, the collection efficiency was greater than 95%. In the third stage, the collection efficiency for particles a
Dermentzoglou et al. (2003,156395)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Sampled rooms in 1 apartment for 2 h and compared to ambient air.
NR, but winter < 2003
Thessaloniki, Greece
Urban apartment dwellers
NR
Woodburing fireplace, cigarette smoking, cooking fish, chicken, sausage & potato.
NR
NR
PM3.0
NR
PAHs, Pb, Cd, Cu, Mn, Ni, VAs
Smoking could be associated with the highest indoor concentration of total and carcinogenic PAHs.The highest level of pyrens, and
phnanthrenes were during fish frying. Smoking and fish frying had significant effect on Cd in indoor air, while woodburning had no
effect of PAH or heavy metal levels.
Diapouli et al. (2007
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
,156397)
Exposure assessment. Sampling of schools, residence, private vehicle
Schools- 11/2003-02/2004 and 10/2004-12/2004.; Residence-10/2004; Vehicle- 10/204-12/2004
Athens, Greece
Primary school children
NR
NR
Handheld portable Condensation Particle Counters (TSI, Model 3007) were used for all sampling locations. Primary schools indoor
measurements were primarily conducted inside classrooms, at table height. However, at three of the schools, rooms of different
uses were selected. These included a teachers' office (where smoking was permitted), a computer day lab (used by students only
part of the day), and a library and gymnasium (where intense activity took place almost all day long). Outdoor measurements took
place in the yard of each school. Residence samples were taken in a bedroom at breathing height and on the terrace, for indoor
and outdoor samples, respectively. In-vehicle samples were taken by placing the CPC 3700 on the passenger seat while the
vehicle drove along predetermined routes.
NR
0.01-1 pm
0.01-1 pm
NR
The results showed that children attending primary schools in the Athens area are exposed to significant PM concentration levels,
both indoors and outdoors, Vehicular emissions seem to be a major contributor to the measured outdoor concentration levels at the
studied sites. Indoor PM concentrations appeared to be influenced by both vehicular emissions and indoor sources including
July 2009
A-249
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
cleaning activities, smoking, a high number of people in relation to room volume and furniture material (i.e., carpet.).; UFPs
concentrations diurnal variation, both outside the schools and the residence, supports the close relation of UFPs levels with traffic
density. Indoor concentrations within schools exhibited variability during the school day only when there were significant changes in
room occupancy. 24-h variation of indoor concentrations at the residence followed quite well (R2 = 0.89) the outdoor one, with a
delay of 1 -h or less.
Diapouli et al. (2008,190893)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Indoor, outdoor air monitoring of PM. To determine children exposure in school environment. To evaluate relationship between
indoor and outdoor levels.
Athens, Greece
Primary schools
NR
Indoor PM2.5 and PM10presence of children and activities of children in classrooms PMivehicles
Harvard PEM, Teflon filters Dust Trak Condensation particle counter
NR
Weight concentration PM2.5, PM10 Number concentration PM1
Weight concentration PM2.5, PM10 Number concentration PM1
N03-, SO42-
High levels of PM10 and PM2.5 measured indoors and outdoors. PM10 more variable spatially than PM2.5. Indoor/Outdoor ratio for
PM10 and PM2.5 close to 1 at almost all sites. Ratio of PMismaller than 1 in all cases. Vehicular traffic presumed to be the main
source of PM1. Indoor PM2.5 and PM10 levels dependent on the amount of activity in classroom and outdoor levels. Indoor SO42-
concentrations strongly associated with outdoor levels. Result suggests that SO42- can be used as a proper surrogate for indoor PM
of outdoor origin.
Dills et al. (2006,156402)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Dose-response, variability, and applicability of methoxyphenols as biomarkers in a realistic exposure situation mimicking indoor
open fire cooking
August. Year not specified
Seattle, WA
Non-smokers exposed to woodsmoke
20-65 yr
Not required. Subjects exposed to wood smoke. One subject fitted with an integrating nephelometer for a continuous estimate of
particle exposure, and a continuous monitor for CO, CO2, and temperature. For 24-h prior to the exposure, subjects collected all
urine voids at 'will in separate containers for a baseline ofmethoxyphenol excretion. Subjects then collected all urine voids at will for
48 h postexposure for measuring wood smoke biomarker elimination.
Air collected at breathing level using Harvard Personal Environmental Monitor for PM2.5 (HPEM2.5)
PM2.5
NA. No microenvironmental studied
NR
22 methoxyphenols, levoglucosan, and 17 polynuclear hydrocarbons for personal filter samples and urine samples.
According to the authors "A 12-h avg creatinine-adjusted methoxyphenol concentration is a practical metric for the biomarker
exposure to woodsmoke." Propylguaiacol, syringol, methylsyringol, ethylsyringol, and ropylsyringol had peak urinary concentrations
after the woodsmoke exposure.
Dimitroulopoulou et al. (2006, 090302)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Exposure assessment. Development of a model to predict indoor PM2.5 concentrations under various emissions scenarios
1997-1999
5 sites in the UK Harwell, Birmingham East, Bradford, Bloomsbury, Marylebone Rd.
Indoor environments within homes
NR
Smoking, cooking
No personal exposure assessment was conducted.
NR
PM10, PM2.5
PM10, PM2.5
NR
Modeled mean concentrations were most sensitive to variation in outdoor concentrations, air exchange rates, and deposition
velocity. Modeled peak concentrations were most sensitive to variations in emissions rates and room size. Cooking activities incre
Ebelt et al. (2005, 056907)
Study Design Personal exposure assessment related to health outcomes for a sensitive sub-population
Period Summer 1998
Location Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
July 2009
A-250
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Mlcroenvlronment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
16 persons who had COPD
Mean subject age 74 yr, Range 54 to 86
Separated total personal exposure into "ambient" and "non-ambient" based on sulfate results and modeling.
"Subjects wore a PM2.5 sampler that provided 24-h integrated personal PM2.5 exposure data." No other details reported.
PM2.5
"ambient exposure" PM2.5, PM10, PM2.5-10; "non-ambient exposure" PM2.5
PM2.5, PM10, PM2.5-10
Ambient sulfate,; ambient non-sulfate,; personal sulfate,; personal ambient non-sulfate
Ambient exposures and (to a lesser extent) ambient concentrations were associated with health outcomes; total and nonambient
particle exposures were not.
Farmer et al. (2003,089017)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Mlcroenvlronment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
case control
12 months
Prague, Czech Republic (2 sites); Kosice, Slovak republic; Sofia, Bulgaria
Policeman and Busdrivers usually working through busy streets in 8-1 Oh shifts and a Control Population.
Variable, range not stated
NR
Personal Monitoring Devices; Blood and Urine Samples; Stationary Versatile Air Pollution Samplers (VAPS)
PM10
NR
PM10; PM2.5 (not reported)
EOM; EOM2; B[a]P; c-PAHs
Extractable organic matter (EOM) per PM10 was at least 2-fold higher in winter than in summer, and c-PAHs over 10-fold higher in
winter than in summer. Personal exposure to B[a]P and to total c-PAHs in Prague ca. was 2-fold higher in the exposed group
compared to the control group, in Kosice ca. 3-fold higher, and in Sofia ca. 2.5-fold higher.
Farmer et al. (2003,089017)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Mlcroenvlronment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Molecular epidemiology studies of carcinogenic environmental pollutants, particularly PAHs
NR
Prague, Czech Rep.; Kosice, Slovak Rep.; Sofia, Bulgaria
Policemen and bus drivers
NR
No
"Personal monitors for PM10"; Extraction by dichloromethane and analyzed for PAH by HPLC with fluorimetric detection.
PM10
NR
PM10; Extractable organic material (EOM); B[a]P; cPAHs
Benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P); Carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (cPAHs)
Personal exposure to B[a]P and to total carcinogenic PAHs in Prague was twofold higher in the exposed group compared to
controls, in Kosice three fold higher, and in Sofia 2.5-fold higher.
Ferro etal. (2004, 055387)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Personal Method
Personal Size
Mlcroenvlronment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Case study, 1 home
Redwood City, California
NR
NR
NR
Co-located real-time particle counters and integrated filter samplers (Met-One Model 237B) were used to measure personal (PEM),
indoor (SIM) and outdoor (SAM) PM concentrations. The PEM was attached to a backpack frame and worn by the investigator
while performing prescribed activities. The SIM was attached to a six foot step-ladder with the intake at breathing height. The SAM
was located under a two-sided roofed shed in the backyard of the home with the filter samplers supported by a metal stand and the
real-time particle counters sitting on a table.
PM5
PM2.5; PMs
PM2.5; PMs
NR
The results of this study indicate that house dust resuspended from a range of human activities increases personal PM
concentrations and this resuspension effect significantly contributes to the personal cloud. The results of this study also suggest
that normal human activities that resuspend house dust may contribute significantly to the strong correlations found between
personal exposure and indoor PM concentrations in previous studies. The PEM/SIM ratios for human activity presented in this
paper are also in the range of those reported by previous studies.
July 2009
A-251
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Ferro et al. (2004, 055676)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Modeling of PM source strengths from human activities
April 2000
Redwood City, CA
Residential home occupants
NR
Yes. Vacuuming resulted in the maximum PM2.5 source strength while two persons walking around and sitting on furniture resulted in
the maximum PM5 source strength.
Met-One Model 237B laser particle counters (2.8 Lpm); AIHL design cyclone samplers with filters (21 and 11 Lpm for PM2.5 and PM5
respectively)
PM2.5, PM5
PM2.5, PM5
PM2.5, PM5
NR
The source strengths were found to be a function of the number of persons performing the activity, the vigor of the activity, and the
type of flooring. Proximity to the source played a large role in the observed differences between indoor concentration and personal
exposure.
Fromme et al. (2007
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Copollutant(s)
Primary Findings
,156453)
Explorative analysis
Winter session December 2004-March 2005; summer session May to July 2005
Munich (and surrounding districts), Germany
Primary and secondary school children
NR
NR
Filter-based measurements of PM2.5 in the classrooms were conducted with a medium volume sampler using a flow controlled pump
(Derenda, Teltow, Germany). The sample inlet was a PM2.5 sampler, having a 50% collection efficiency for particles with a 2.5 mm
aerodynamic diameter. A Munktell 47mm binder free glass fibre filter with a pore size of 2 mm was used. Continuous
measurements of PM (e.g. PM10, PM4, PM2.5) were also done using an optical laser aerosol spectrometer (LAS) (Dust monitor
1.108). A TSI model 3034 scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS) (TSI Inc., Shoreview, MN, USA) was used to measure particle
number concentrations (PNC) for a discrete size distribution of aerosols. Indoor carbon dioxide was measured using a continuously
monitoring infrared sensor (Testo 445).; The sampling and measuring position in the classroom was opposite to the black board,
about one meter above floor level, the level at which the pupils would normally inhale.
NR
PM2.5; PM4; PM10
PM10, PN (particle number)
CO2
Results clearly showed that exposure to PM in school is high. This study identified parameters correlated with increased
concentrations of PM such as high CO2 concentrations and low class level. Strong seasonal variability was observed, with air
quality being particularly poor in winter. The influence of season on PM concentrations observed has been reported before from the
US (Keeler et al., 2002). This difference is most likely due to the different ventilation practice in summer and winter. Further
parameters correlated with increased concentrations of PM were small room size, high number of occupants, high CO2
concentrations and low class level. No significant differences between PM and values in classrooms with carpets and those with
hard surface floorings were reported. The number of fine and ultra fine particles measured in classrooms was in the same range or
lower as the results from residences or outdoor monitoring sites (reported in similar studies) and show little variation.
Gadkari and Pervez
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
(2007,156459)
Evaluation of relative source contribution estimates of various routes of personal RPM in different urban residential environments.
Summer 2004 (March 15-June 15)
Chattisgarh, India
All likely. Not specified
21 -61 yr, average age 40 ± 15 yr
No
Personal respirable dust samplers (RDS) with GFF
RPM
NR
RPM
Fe, Ca, Mg, Na K, Cd, Hg, Ni, Cr, Zn, As, Pb, Mn and Li
Authors concluded that "(1) indoor activities and poor ventilation qualities are responsible for major portion of high level of indoor
RPM, (2) majority of personal RPM is greatly correlated with residential indoor RPM, (3) time-activity diary of individuals has much
impact on relationship investigations of their personal RPM with their respective indoor and ambient-outdoor RPM levels; as
reported in earlier reports and (4) residential indoors, local road-traffic and soil-borne RPMs are the dominating routes of personal
exposure compared to ambient outdoor RPM levels."
July 2009
A-252
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Gauvin et al. (2002, 034893)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Fine particle exposure assessment for children in French urban environments, part of VESTA study
March 1998-December 2000
Paris, Grenoble, Toulouse, France
Children aged 8-14 yr
Yes-ETS from mother, rodents at home.
SKC pump 4 Lpm with PM2.5 inlet and 37 mm, 2 micron Teflon filter
PM2.5
NR
PM10
NR
The final model explains 36% of the between subjects variance in PM2.5 exposure, with ETS contributing more than a third to this.
Geyh etal. (2004,156467)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Primary Finding(s)
An evaluation of a modified personal monitoring pump (PMASS)
NR
Fresno, CA and Baltimore, Maryland
Persons for personal sampling
NR
PMASS and PEM "adjusted mass measurements downward by 22% to eliminate measurement bias with the Harvard impactor."
Particle mass
Particle mass
NR
EC, OC, nitrate
PMASS measurements of mass showed a significant bias of -24% compared to the reference sampler.; For microenvironmental
sampling the PMASS for mass concentrations again had a bias of -34%, but for EC, OC and nitrate were much closer but still with a
bias of 6.6-17.5%.
Geyh etal. (2005,186949)
Study Design
Period
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Copollutant(s)
Primary Findings
Exposure assessment- representative population (WTC truck drivers) study
October 2001 and April 2002
Indoor
Each driver was given two monitors consisting of small portable pumps and battery packs worn at the waist, and sampling cartridges
worn on the shoulder within the breathing zone. Monitoring was conducted across a work shift on all days of the week during both
day and night shifts (6:00am to 6:00pm, and 6:00pm to 6:00am, respectively). Drivers were asked to wear their monitors at all
times. If they were planning to sleep in their trucks, they were told they could remove the pumps from their belts and place them on
the seat beside them.; Area monitoring was also conducted at the site at four locations around the perimeter of the disaster site on
streets approximately representing the north, east, and south/southwest boundaries of the debris field. In addition, monitoring was
also conducted directly in the debris pile for several days. The set of monitors were hung at head height either from scaffolding,
from a chain link fence, or placed on supports, such as tank cages in the debris pile.; Sampling pumps used for particle sampling
were either SKC Universal pumps(model 223-PCXR4), BGI personal sampling pumps (model 400S0, or ELF personal sampling
pumps (MSA Inc). VOC sampling was conducted with SKC pocket pumps (Personal Packet Pump 210 series).
TD; PM10; PM2.5
NR
TD; PM10; PM2.5
EC; OC
VOC(s)
During October, the median personal exposure to TD was 346 pg/m3. The maximum area concentration 1742 pg/m3, was found in
the middle of the debris. The maximum TD concentration found at the perimeter was 392 pg/m3 implying a strong concentration
gradient from the middle of debris outward. PM2.5 /PM10 ratios ranged from 23% to 100% suggesting significant fire activity during
some of the sampled shifts. During April, the median personal exposure to TD was 144 pg/m3, and the highest area concentration,
195 pg/m3, was found at the perimeter. Although the overall concentrations on PM at the site were significantly lower in April, the
relative contributions of fine particles to the PM10, and EC and OC to the TD were similar. During both months, volatile organic
compounds concentrations were low. Comparison of recorded EC and OC values from October 2001 and April 2002 with previous
studies suggests that the primary source of exposure to EC for the WTC truck drivers was emissions from their own vehicles.
Goyal and Sidhartha (2004,156487)
Study Design Actual air monitoring measurements are compared with a model.
Period 1998-1999
Location Delhi, India
Population Residents near coal-fired power plants (BTPS)
Age Groups NR
Indoor Source NR
July 2009
A-253
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
NR
NR
NR
Suspended PM (SPM)
NR
Measured SPM values are higher during the day than at night. This is because "point sources dominate during the daytime
convective conditions. At night the small depth of the nocturnal boundary layer prevents the dispersion of the pollutants from the
elevated point source to reach the surface. Convective turbulence breaks up the surface-based inversion and the fumigation
process leads to an increased contribution from the point sources."
Graney et al. (2004, 053756)
Study Design
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
The study was designed to assess the trace metal quantification abilities of several analytical methods to measure the total as well
as soluble amounts of metals with PM2.5 collected from indoor and PM samples. (X-ray fluorescence and instrumental neutron
activation analysis)
Retirement facility in Towson, Maryland
Retirement facility with subjects who spent 94% of their time indoors
Mean age = 84 yr
No, this was not the objective of the study
Measured using personal exposure monitors (MSP Inc) with nozzle to remove particles >4 pg/m3
PM2.5
PM2.5
NR
42 elements were analyzed for in the PM2.5 samples collected from personal and well as indoor samples
1) Most of the extractable components of the metals were in a water-soluble form suggesting a high potential for bioavailability of
elements from respiratory exposure to PM2.5. 2) based on comparison of trace metals in central indoor site vs. PE samples, resident
activities result in exposure to higher cone of soluble trace metals.
Guo et al. (2004,156506)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Human exposure assessment
Sept. 2001-Jan. 2002
Hong Kong
Shoppers at food markets
NR
Yes. Elevated concentrations of PM at three markets probably due to outdoor particulates from vehicular exhaust. Poultry stalls in
the markets had higher PM10 due to live chickens.
TSI Dust Trak Model 8520.1 n some locations an Anderson Hi-Vol sampler with filters weighed by electronic microbalance were used
to calibrate the Dust Trak.
PM10
PM10
PM10
NR
Indoor PM10 concentrations at the markets were generally below Hong Kong Indoor Air Quality Objectives. Outdoor sources were
dominant at the five markets, with elevated levels at three markets due to vehicular exhaust.
Hanninen et al. (2004,056812)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
EXPOLIS-human exposure assessment
1996-2000
Athens, Greece; Basle, Switzerland; Helsinki, Finland; Prague, Czech Republic
Residential homes
NR
Yes. Sources identified in statistical analysis wooden building material, use of stove other than electric, PVC floors, attached garage
Pump & filter with gravimetric analysis; Elemental composition using energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence
PM2.5
NR
PM2.5
PM2.5 -bound sulfur
Associated with indoor concentration wooden building material, city, building age, floor of residence (ground, 1st, etc.), and use of
stove other than electric.
Haverinen-Shaughnessy et al. (2007,156526)
Study Design Cross-sectional
Period Winter, year not reported
Location Eastern Sweden
July 2009
A-2 54
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Population
Age Groups
Personal Method
Personal Size
Mlcroenvlronment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Elementary school teachers
NR
Button inhalable aerosol samplers
Particle mass
Particle mass
NR
Absorbance coefficient/m x 10-5; Total fungi (spores/m3); Total bacteria (cells/m3); Viable fungi MEA (CFU/m3); Viable fungi DG18
(CFU/m3); Viable bacteria (CFU/m3)
The recall period of 7 days provided the most reliable data for health effect assessment. Both personal exposure and concentrations
of pollutants at home were more frequently associated with health symptoms than work exposures.
Hazenkamp-von Arx et al. (2003,136487)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Mlcroenvlronment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Exposure assessment
November 2000-February 2001
21 European cities Antwerp City, Antwerp South, Albacete, Barcelona, Basel, Erfurt, Galdakao, Grenoble, Goteborg, Huelva,
Ipswich, Norwich, Ovledo, Pavia, Paris, Reykjavik, Tartu, Turin, Umea, Uppsala, Verona
European urban environments
NR
NR
No personal exposure assessment was conducted
NR
NR
NR
NR
Winter mean PM2.5 concentrations were lowest in Iceland and Sweden and highest in Northern Italy (Turin, Verona). Cities also
varied in daily concentrations. Geographical differences may be explained by differences in emissions (proximity of monitor to
traffic.
Henderson et al. (2007, 090675)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Mlcroenvlronment Size
Ambient Size
Copollutant(s)
Primary Findings
Land use regression was employed to model oxides of nitrogen and fine particulates using two measures of traffic (road length and
vehicle density)
Sampling was conducted from Feb 24 through Mar 14 and Sep 8 through Sep 26, 2003
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
NR
NA
NR
Personal monitoring was not conducted. Ambient fine particles were collected on PTFE filters using Harvard Impactors. Flow rate
was 4 L/min Absorption coefficients were also calculated
NR
NR
PM2.5
NO, NO2
Adjusted R2 for the linear regression models predicting NO, NO2, PM2.5, and ABS from fifty-five variables describing each sampling
site ranged from 0.39 to 0.62. The resulting maps show the distribution of NO to be more heterogeneous than that of NO2,
supporting the usefulness of land use regression for assessing spatial patterns of traffic-related pollution
Hertel et al. (2008,156543)
Study Design
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Mlcroenvlronment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Exposure assessment
Denmark
Bicycle commuters
NR
No
NR
PM2.5, PM10
NR
NR
NO2
It is possible to significantly reduce the accumulated air pollution exposure during the daily bicycle route between home and work by
following the low exposure route. Travelling outside the rush hour time periods significantly reduced the accumulated air pollution
exposure along the routes through the city.
Ho et al. (2004,056804)
Study Design Human exposure assessment
July 2009
A-255
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
25 Sept. 2002 to 8 March 2003
Hong Kong
Occupied buildings located near major roadways
NR
Yes. Regression of indoor versus outdoor concentrations of OC and EC revealed an indoor source of OC not present for EC,
presumably due to such activities of cooking, smoking, and cleaning.
Co-located mini-volume samplers (flow rate 5 L/min) and Partisol model 2000 sampler with 2.5 micron inlet. All samples on 47 mm
Whatman quartz microfiber filters, weighed on an electronic microbalance. Analyzed for OC and EC using DRI Model 2001
Thermal/Optical Carbon Analyzer.
PM2.5
NR
PM2.5
OC; EC; OM; TCA
The major source of indoor EC, OC, and PM2.5 appears to be penetration of outdoor air, with a much greater attenuation in
mechanically ventilated buildings.
Hoek etal. (2008,156554)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Exposure assessment, characterizing indoor/outdoor particle relationships
October 2002-March 2004
4 European cities Amsterdam, Athens, Birmingham, Helsinki
Urban populations
NR
Smoking, candle burning, cooking/frying
No personal exposure assessment was conducted
NR
PM10, PM2.5, PMio-2.5, Ultrafine (UFP)
PM10, PM2.5, PMio-2.5, Ultrafine (UFP)
soot, sulfate
Correlation between 24-avg [should this be 24-h avg?] central site and indoor concentrations was lower for UFP than for PM2.5, soot,
or sulfate, probably related to greater losses during infiltration due to smaller particle size. Infiltration factors for UFP and PM2.5 were
low.
Holguin et al. (2003,057326)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Component(s)
Primary Findings
Longitudinal analysis (repeated measures) of local PM2.5 and biological markers of cardiovascular dysregulation
3 months (Feb 8-Apr 30, 2000)
Mexico City, Mexico
Elderly residents of a nursing home (non-smokers)
60-96
Sources of indoor PM concentrations may be idling buses parked for a few hours close to living areas at least 3 times per week
Mini-vol portable air samplers operating at 4 l/min used to monitor outdoor and indoor PM2.5 concentrations at a nursing home.
Gravimetric analysis of filters. Personal exposure calculated using time-weighted averages of outdoor and indoor concentration
NR
NR
NR
NR
Increases in personal PM2.5 concentrations were associated with significant decreases in the high-frequency component of heart
rate variability (HRV-hF) among elderly. Associations remained significant after adjusting for ozone; Indoor and outdoor PM2.5
Hopkeetal. (2003,095544)
Study Design Epidemiology-Exposure study
Period 26 July to 22 August 1998
Location Retirement facility in Towson, MD
Population "A potentially susceptible elderly subpopulation"
Age Groups Mean age of 84
Indoor Source Ammonium sulfate and ammonium nitrate, secondary sulfate, OC, and motor vehicle exhaust
Personal Method Personal exposure samples were collected on 37mm Teflon filters using inertial impactor PEM in the breathing zone of the subjects.
A "scalper" (MSP, PEM-019) nozzle was used on the PEM to exclude particles >4mm in order to reduce the potential of
overloading the impactor. Centralized indoor sampling was conducted in an unoccupied apartment on the fifth floor of the retirement
facility (central indoor). The windows of the apartment were kept closed and the front door was kept open to the common hallway
with a small fan providing active air exchange. Residential outdoor sampling at the retirement facility was conducted from the
rooftop of an attached three-story nursing care facility (outdoor). PM2.5 measurements at an ambient site in Towson, MD were made
on the roof of a sampling shelter approximately four meters off the ground (community). Daily community, outdoor, and central
indoor PM2.5 samples were collected with VAPS samplers.
Personal Size PM2.5
July 2009
A-256
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Microenvironment Size PM2.5
Ambient Size PM2.5
Components) NR
Primary Findings VAPS and PEM data from the BPMEES were separately analyzed by different receptor models. These two approaches were
complementary and allowed for evaluation of all of the available data. A three-way analysis of the VAPS data provided four sources
of PM2.5, nitrate-sulfate, sulfate, OC, and MV exhaust. The largest contribution to the community, outdoor, and central indoor
sampling locations was the sulfate source. Infiltration of the sources varied depending on the source and ranged from 38% to 4%
for the Sulfate, and Nitrate-Sulfate sources, respectively. In addition, MV exhaust had a penetration rate similar to Sulfate (32%).
The OC source had little variability compared to the other sources and contributed approximately 8% of the community and outdoor
PM and 18% of the central indoor PM.; The PEM data were analyzed using a complex model with a target for soil that included
factors that are common to all of the types of samples (external factors) and factors that only apply to the data from the individual
and apartment samples (internal factors). From these results, the impact of outdoor sources and indoor sources on indoor
concentrations were assessed. The identified external factors were sulfate, soil, and an unknown factor. Internal factors were
identified as gypsum or wall board, personal care products, and a factor representing variability not explained by the other indoor
sources. The latter factor had a composition similar to outdoor particulate matter and explained 36% of the personal exposure.
External factors contributed 63% to personal exposure with the largest contribution from sulfate (48%).
Jacquemin et al. (2007,156600)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Assessment of relationship between outdoor and personal concentrations of PM25] absorbance and sulfur among post-myocardial
infarction patients
January 2004-June 2004
Barcelona, Spain
Survivors of a myocardial infarction exposed to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS)
n = 38 (males 32 (84%), age over or equal to 65 [something missing here] 15 (39%)
Not identified in this study. Results from other studies discussed.
Personal samplers (BGI GK2.05 cyclones and battery operated BGI AFC400S pumps)
PM2.5
NA
PM2.5
Sulfur (S)
Authors suggest that "outdoor measurements of absorbance and sulfur can be used to estimate both the daily variation and levels of
personal exposures also in Southern European countries, especially when exposure to ETS has been taken into account. For PM2.5,
indoor sources need to be carefully considered."
Janssen et al. (2005, 088692)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Panel Study
Amsterdam 11 /2/1998-6/18/1999; Helsinki 11/1/1998-4/30/1999
Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Helsinki, Finland
Elderly Cardiovascular Patients
50-84 yr
No
Personal PM2.5GK2.05; cyclones; indoor & outdoor Harvard Impactors; Reflectance EEL 43 reflectometers; Elemental Composition
Tracor Spectrace 5000 ED-XRF system
PM2.5
PM2.5
PM2.5
Estimated Elemental Carbon (Abs); Elemental composition of a subset of personal, indoor and outdoor samples
For most elements, personal and indoor; concentrations were lower than and highly correlated with outdoor concentrations. The
highest correlations (median r.0.9) were found for sulfur and particle absorbance (EC), which both represent fine; mode particles
from outdoor origin. Low correlations were observed for elements that represent the coarser part of the PM2.5 particles (Ca, Cu, Si,
CI).
Jansen et al. (2005,082236)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Panel Study
Winter 2002-2003
Seattle, Washington, USA
Elderly Respiratory Disease Patients (asthma/COPD)
71-86 yr
No
Personal PM10MPEMIO; Indoor home and Outdoor home PM2.5, PM10 Single-stage inertial Harvard Impactors and 37-mm Teflon
filters
PM10
PM10, PM2.5, fine particles (-PM1)
PM10, PM2.5
July 2009
A-257
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Components) BC, as an estimate of elemental carbon (EC)
Primary Findings For 7 subjects with asthma, a 10 pg/m3 increase in 24-h avg outdoor PM10; and PM2.5 was associated with a 5.9 [95% CI: 2.9-8.9]
and 4.2 ppb (95% CI: 1.3-7.1) increase in FeNO, respectively. A 1 pg/m3 increase in outdoor, indoor, and personal BC was
associated with increases in FeNO of 2.3 ppb (95% CI: 1.1-3.6), 4.0 ppb (95% CI: 2.0-5.9), and 1.2 ppb (95% CI: 0.2-2.2),
respectively. No significant association was found between; PM or BC measures and changes in spirometry, blood pressure, pulse
rate, or Sa02 in these subjects.
Jaques et al. (2004,155878)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Exposure assessment, field evaluation of continuous PM2.5 monitor in comparison to integrated samplers
February-August 2002
Claremont, California
Continuous PM2.5 sampler, time-integrated PM2.5 samplers
NR
NR
No personal exposure assessment was conducted
NR
NR
PM2.5
NR
PM2.5 mass measurements using the Differential TEOM monitor are consistent with those of the MOUDI and Partisol. Differences
can be explained by loss of ammonium nitrate from reference time-integrated samplers. Partisol underestimates MOUDI measured
mass.
Jedrychowski et al. (2006,156606)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Prospective cohort
11/2000-3/2003
Krakow, Poland
Non-smoking pregnant women
Yes
Personal; Exposure Monitor Sampler (PEMS, Harvard; School of Public Health) with
PM2.5
NR
PM10
NR
The contribution of the background ambient PM10 level was very strong determinant of the total personal exposure to PM2.5 and it
explained about 31 % of variance between the subjects.
Jo and Lee(2006,156613)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Case study
Winter of 2004 and summer of 2005
Daegu, Korea
Residents of high-rise apartment buildings
NR
All of the surveyed apartments were constructed with concrete and iron frames. The apartments used liquid petroleum gas for
cooking and as their primary heating system. The exhaust gas generated from heating or cooking was mechanically vented out of
the apartments.
The PM10 concentrations were measured using real-time light scattering PM10 monitors (HAZDUST Model EPAM-500). The CO
concentrations were measured using a CO dosimeter (CMCD-1 OP) equipped with an activated charcoal-Purafil prefilter.; From each
building, one lower-floor apartment (first or second floor) and one higher-floor apartment (between 10th and 15th floor) were
simultaneously surveyed. The concentrations of CO and PM10 were measured at the breathing height in the main living area where
the participants spent most of their time and from the apartment balconies outdoors.
NR
PM10
PM10
CO
This study found that the outdoor air concentrations of CO and PM10 were higher for lower-floor apartments than for higher-floor
apartments situated in residential areas. In addition, the concentrations were significantly higher in winter and in summer,
regardless of the floor height of the apartments. The indoor concentrations in the lower- and higher-floor apartments, however, were
not consistent with the outdoor concentrations. Proximity to a major roadway was found to increase the indoor and outdoor
concentrations of PM10 in high-rise apartments and therefore cause elevated exposures of the residents during presence at home.
This was not observed for CO. Atmospheric stability was found to elevate indoor and outdoor air pollutant concentrations and was
therefore determined to be another important factor regarding the level of exposure to CO and PM10.
July 2009
A-258
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Johannesson et al.
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
(2007,156614)
Cohort
Spring and fall seasons of 2002 and 2003
Gothenburg, Sweden
General adult population
23-51 yr
NR
Fine particles were measured for 24 h using both personal and stationary monitoring equipment. Personal monitoring of PM2.5 and
PM1 was carried out simultaneously with parallel measurements of PM2.5 and PM1 indoors in living rooms and outside the house on
a balcony, porch, etc. In addition, urban background PM2.5 levels were measured. Personal monitoring was performed in two ways.
The 20 randomly selected subjects carried personal monitoring equipment for PM2.5 only, while the 10 staff members carried two
pieces of personal monitoring equipment at the same time. On the first measuring occasion, the staff members carried one PM2.5
cyclone and one PM1 cyclone. On the second occasion, duplicate monitors for PM2.5 were used. For personal and residential
monitoring, the BGI Personal Sampling Pump was used together with the GK2.05 cyclone for PM2.5 sampling and the Triplex
cyclone SCC1.062 for PMisampling. The personal sampling pump was placed in a small shoulder bag and the cyclone attached to
the shoulder strap near the subject's breathing zone. The personal monitoring equipment was carried by the subject during awake
time. During the night, it was placed in the living room. For indoor monitoring in living rooms, cyclones (PM2.5 and PM1) were placed
at about 1.5 m above the floor. The same setup was used for residential outdoor monitoring. The urban background monitor was
placed on top of a roof somewhat south of the city center but not near any major highway.
PM2.5; PM1
PM2.5; PM1
PM2.5; PM1
BS
Personal exposure of PM2.5 correlated well with indoor levels, and the associations with residential outdoor and urban background
concentrations were also acceptable. Statistically significantly higher personal exposure compared with residential outdoor levels of
PM2.5was found for nonsmokers. PM1 made up a considerable proportion (about 70-80%) of PM2.5. For BS, significantly higher
levels were found outdoors compared with indoors, and levels were higher outdoors during the fall than during spring. There were
relatively low correlations between particle mass and BS. The urban background station provided a good estimate of the residential
outdoor concentrations of both PM2.5 and BS2.5 within the city. The air mass origin affected the outdoor levels of both PM2.5 and
BS2.5; however, no effect was seen on personal exposure or indoor levels.
Jones and Harrison
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
(2006,155886)
NR
January 2002-December 2004
England London Marylebone Road (Located beside arterial road in street canyon carrying approximately 80,000 vehicles per day);
London North Kensington (In grounds of school in west London suburb); Harwell (On western side of business park surrounded by
agricultural land)
NR
NR
NR
No personal monitoring.
NR
NR
PM10
NaCI; Strongly bound H20; Secondary organic material
Using existing co-located and coincident data it has been possible to show that the removal of three natural components—sea salt
(NaCI), strongly bound water and secondary organic matter—would reduce the number of days on which the PM10 concentration
exceeds 50 pg/m3 by about 50%. At each site, amongst the three natural components considered, the strongly bound water makes
the greatest contribution to the mean or median concentrations of PM10, followed by NaCI, and SOC respectively. Strongly bound
water was shown to have the biggest effect on the number of days on which the PM10 concentrations exceeded a value of 50 pg/m3;
however, removal of estimated NaCI and SOC components also had a noteworthy effect on reducing PM10 concentrations.
Therefore, application of this proposed measure would make a very major difference to the likelihood of compliance or otherwise
with the 24-h limit value for PM10.
Jones et al. (2007,156615)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Monitoring living room, child's bedroom, cot, and at 2 heights 1.4 & 0.2 m above the floor
NR but probably 2006
Perth, Australia
Children 0-2 yr
0-2 yr
House age, house type, building material, # of stories, attached garage, main heating fuel, air conditioning
NR
NR
PM10, PM2.5, PMT
July 2009
A-259
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Ambient Size NR
Component(s) NR
Primary Findings No difference between samples at 0.2 and 1.4 m from floor in 3 PM fractions, no difference between living room, child's bedroom,
and crib. Large variability between homes.
Kaur et al. (2005, 086504)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Exposure assessment, evaluation of exposures between modes of transport, routes, timing
April 28-May 23, 2003
Street canyon intersection in Central London, UK
Users of an urban street canyon intersection
NR
NR
PM2.5 measured usnig high-flow gravimetric personal samplers (PM2.5) operating at a flow rate of 16 l/min carried in a backpack with
sampling head positioned in personal breathing zone; Ultrafine particles measured using TSI P-TRAK Ultrafine Particle Counters in
which ambient aerosol mixes with isopropyl alcohol. Alcohol condenses to form droplets that can be easily counted by a
photodetector as they pass through a laser beam.
PM2.5, Ultrafine particles (UFP, 0.02-1 .Oum)
PM2.5, Ultrafine particles (UFP, 0.02-1 .Oum)
PM2.5
NR
Personal exposures to PM2.5 while walking were significantly lower then while riding in a car or taxi, likely a function of greater
distance to roadside. No significant differences in PM2.5 were observed between exposures on the high traffic road compared with
the backroad. Personal exposure levels were lowest during midday measurements for PM2.5 and highest in the early evening.
Personal exposures to ultrafine particles were lowest while walking and highest while riding the bus. Exposures to ultrafine particles
were also significantly higher on the high traffic road and during morning measurements. Exposure to ultrafine particles were
highest in the morning, likely the result of peak traffic density in the morning. Exposure assessment also revealed that the
background and curbside monitoring stations were not representative of the personal exposure of individuals to PM2.5 and CO at
and around a street canyon intersection.
Kaur, et al. (2005,088175)
Study Design Personal exposure assessment of pedestrians walking along high-traffic urban road
Period April 19, 2004-June 11, 2004
Location Central London, UK
Population Pedestrians
Age Groups NR (adults, presumably)
Indoor Source NR
Personal Method PIVksgravimetric filter measurement; Ultrafine PM (0.02-1 pm) P-TRAK device; Reflectance reflectometer measurement of PM2.5
filter
Personal Size PM2.5; Ultrafine PM (0.02-1 pm); Reflectance ("blackness") of PM2.5 filter
Microenvironment Size NR
Ambient Size PM2.5; Ultrafine PM (0.02-1 pm); Reflectance ("blackness") of PM2.5 filter
Components) NR
Primary Findings PM2.5 pedestrian exposure was well correlated with and above background fixed-site monitoring levels. PM pedestrian exposure was
influenced by proximity to curbside and the side of the road walked on.
Kim et al. (2005,156640)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Panel study
8/1999-11/2001
Toronto, Canada
Cardiac-compromised patients
Mean age 64 yr
Yes. Tracer molecules/elements were used to investigate sources of indoor PM, including regional long range transport,
combustion, local crustal materials. All were statistically significantly associated with indoor PM2.5
Rupprecht and Patashnick ChemPass Personal Sampling System
PM2.5
NR
PM2.5
Sulfate, Elemental carbon (EC), Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, Sodium.
Kim et al. (2005,156640)
Study Design Panel study
Period 8/1999-11/2001
Location Toronto, Canada
July 2009
A-260
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Mlcroenvlronment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Cardiac-compromised patients
Mean age 64 yr
Gas range (68%); indoor grill (11%); outdoor barbeque (30%); Gas heating fuel (68%); Oil heating fuel (7%)
Rupprecht and Patashnick ChemPass Personal Sampling System
PM2.5
NR
PM2.5
NR
Personal PM2.5 exposures were higher than outdoor ambient levels. Personal PM2.5 exposures levels were correlated with ambient
levels, mean r = 0.58
Koenig et al. (2003,156653)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Personal Method
Personal Size
Mlcroenvlronment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Comprehensive exposure assessment. "The research was part of an intensive exposure assessment and health effects panel study
of susceptible sub-populations in Seattle from; 1999 through 2002 (Liu et al., 2003, 073841)."
10-day monitoring session winter 2000-2001; 10-day monitoring session spring 2001
Seattle, WA
Asmatic children
6-13 yr
Harvard personal environmental monitors; Continuous PM monitors (nephelometers); Harvard Impactors; TEOM monitors; and
exhaled breath measurements into an NO-inert Mylar balloon
PM2.5
PM2.5
PM2.5
NR
This study found a consistent relationship between daily eNO values in children with asthma and daily PM2.5 measured at fixed sites
and on subjects. As hypothesized, the authors found that the use of ICS therapy modified the association between eNO and PM2.5.
Including ambient NO values for the hour of the home visit from a central site in the model and discarding high NO days (>100 ppb)
attenuated the magnitude but did not alter the association between PM2.5 and eNO in all analyses. Same-day outdoor, indoor,
personal, and central PM2.5 levels were associated with eNO in either analysis. These data suggest ambient PM2.5 exposure in
Seattle is associated with an increase in eNO in children with asthma. Because eNO is a marker of airway inflammation, and PM
has been shown to cause inflammation in animal studies, this result is biologically plausible. This finding also agrees with previous
asthma research in Seattle that showed associations between PM2.5 and lung function decrements in children with asthma.
Koistinen et al. (2004,156655)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Mlcroenvlronment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Representative Population-based study
Oct 1996-Dec 1997
Helsinki, Finland
Non-smoking adults not exposed to environmental tobacco smoke.
Adults 25-55 yr
Soil from outdoors, cooking, smoking, aerosol cleaners, sea salt, combustion sources
Aluminum briefcase with personal sampling monitor
PM2.5; BS
PM2.5; BS
PM2.5; BS
% contribution to PM2.5; Outdoor-I ndoor-Work-Personal; CoPM * 35 28 32 33; Secondary" 46 36 37 31; Soil 16 27 27 27;
Detergents 0 6 2 6; Sea Salt 3212
Population exposure assessment of PM2.5, based on outdoor fixed-site monitoring, overestimates exposures to outdoor sources like
traffic and long-range transport and does not account for the contribution of significant indoor sources.
Kousa et al. (2001,025270)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Population based exposure assessment
October 1996 to June 1998
Helsinki, Finland; Basel, Switzerland; Prague, Czech Republic; Athens, Greece
Adult urban populations
25-55 yr
NR, Workplace and residential outdoor samples could not be collected for every participant. The number of non-ETS-exposed
participants was particularly small in Prague (12) and Athens (29), and therefore, these results from these cities should be
interpreted with caution. The population sampling and sample representativity issues are described in detail in Rotko et al. (2000,
0121181. and, for the Basel sample, in Oglesby et al. (2000, 0018321.
The 48 h PM2.5 exposure was measured by a personal exposure monitor (PEM). Two filter holders were provided for each
participant. One 'workday filter' for work and commuting, about 2 8-10 h, and one "leisure time filter" for the remaining time.
Microenvironmental PM2.5 monitors (MEMs) were placed at the participant's home outdoors and indoors and in their workplaces.
The pumps were programmed to run at home outdoors and indoors during the expected leisure time hours and at workplace during
July 2009
A-261
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
expected working hours of each participant. The personal and microenvironmentai PM2.5 sampling methods and QA/QC results are
presented in detail in Koistinen et al. (1999, 010628).
PM2.5
PM2.5
PM2.5; PM10
NR
In Helsinki the concentration associations are high between the outdoor air concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 measured
simultaneously at different locations. The highest exposure correlations are observed between the personal exposures and the
respective indoor air concentrations. Correlations between the personal exposures and outdoor/ambient air concentrations are
considerably lower (all centers). Personal exposures during leisure time correlate better with outdoor/ambient concentrations than
during the workday (Helsinki and Prague). Leisure time and workday exposures correlate poorly with each other (all centers).
Removing ETS improved the correlations between personal (indoor) air and ambient (outdoor) air, but decreased the correlations
between personal exposures and indoor air concentrations and also between the personal exposures during workday and leisure
time. In spite of these generalizations, there are considerable differences between the cities.
Koutrakis et al. (2005,095800)
Study Design Panel study
Period Baltimore 6/28/98-8/22/98 (summer), 2/1/99-3/16/99 (winter); Boston 6/13/99-7/23/99 (summer), 2/1/00-3/12/00 (winter)
Location Baltimore, MD Boston, MA
Population Healthy older adults, children, adults with COPD
Age Groups Children 9-13 y/o; Seniors 65+y/o; COPD Subjects NR
Indoor Source No
Personal Method Personal exposure samples of PM2.5; were collected using a specially designed multipollutant sampler (Demokritou et al. 2001).
PM2.5was collected using personal environmental monitors (PEMs) and 37-mm; Teflon filters (Teflo, Gelman Sciences, Ann Arbor
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
PM2.5
NR
PM2.5
Elemental Carbon (EC); SO42-
Ambient PM2.5 and SO4 are strong predictors of respective personal exposures. Ambient SO4 is a strong predictor of personal
exposure to PM2.5. Because PM2.5 has substantial indoor sources and SO4 does not, the investigators; concluded that personal
exposure to SO4 accurately reflects exposure to ambient PM2.5 and therefore the ambient component of personal exposure to PM2.5
as well.
Kulkarni and Patil (2003,156664)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Personal exposure assessment of toxic metals
NR
Mumbai, India; Two localities or sites, namely, Marol and Sakinaka, denoted as Sites 1 and 2 respectively
Outdoor workers- low-income group population working and residing in industrial areas
NR
low grade cooking fuel and inadequate ventilation
A personal sampler (Cassela/ SKC make), which consists of a diaphragm pump and operates on rechargeable batteries, was used
along with a cyclone to measure personal exposure to respirable PM (RPM). The device was fitted to the waist belt of the
respondent and connected by a flexible tube to the cyclone, which can be clipped to the shirt collar. The inlet of the cyclone was
kept near the breathing level of the respondent. After working hours, the personal sampler was worn by the respondent in his/ her
residence. Before sleeping, the sampler was removed from the waist and kept in the "on" condition as close to the breathing level
as possible.; The RPM in ambient air was measured simultaneously by using high volume sampler (HVS) with a cyclone
attachment for removal of particles with size greater than 10 pm.
PM5
NR
PM5
Lead; Nickel; Cadmium; Copper; Chromium; Potassium; Iron; Manganese
All listed metals were detected in the ambient air where as only Lead, Cadmium, Manganese, and Potassium were detected in
personal exposures. Mean daily exposure to lead exceeds the Indian NAAQS by a factor of 4.2. However, ambient concentration of
lead conforms to this standard. There is a rising trend in the personal exposures and ambient levels of cadmium. However, they are
low and do not pose any major health risk as yet. Personal exposures to toxic metals exceed the corresponding ambient levels by a
large factor ranging from 6.1 to 13.2. Thus, ambient concentrations may underestimate health risk due to personal exposure of toxic
metals. Outdoor exposure to toxic metals is greater than the indoor (ratios ranging from 2.3 to 1.1) except for potassium (ratio 0.77).
However, there is no significant correlation between these two.
Kumar etal. (2006,129347)
Study Design Use of one year's 24-h monitoring data to model exposure to vehicular emissions.
Period Apr 1991-Feb 1992
Location Mumbai, India
July 2009
A-262
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Mlcroenvlronment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
exposure to lead at busy intersections
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Suspended PM (SPM)
Ai As Ca Cu Cr Fe Hg K Mg Mn Na Ni NO2 Pb O2 SO4 SPM "Concentration in ng/m3, number of samples = 45.
Application of a hybrid, receptor cum dispersion model is one possible way to evaluate effective emission factors for vehicles in
different operating conditions like those at traffic-junctions. The composite approach of receptor and dispersion model gives realistic
effective emission factors and will be useful for air quality management.
Laietal. (2006,090262)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Mlcroenvlronment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Population-based assessment of urban adult exposures. Identifying determinants of indoor PM concentrations
1996-2000
Athens, Basel, Helsinki, Milan, Oxford, Prague
Homes of urban adults
NR
Number of people smoking at home, duration of gas stove use. A previous paper is cited for full details on sampling methodology
(Jantunenet al, 1998)
No personal exposure assessment was conducted.
NR
NR
NR
BS
Number of people smoking at home, outdoor PM2.5 conc., wind speed, duration of gas stove use, and outdoor temperature were
significant determinants of indoor PM2.5. City-specific effects included outdoor PM2.5 conc., smoking, and wind speed. Outdoor BS,
Laietal. (2004,056811)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Mlcroenvlronment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Personal exposure study
December 1998-February 2000
Oxford, UK
Adults
25-55 yr(avg = 41)
Cooking, active smoking, passive smoking heating by gas heater
Personal exposure monitors (PEM) were carried by the participant for 48-h personal sampling, and microenvironmental monitors
(MEM) were placed inside the participant's home (residential indoor), outside the home (residential outdoor) and in the participant's
workplace (workplace indoor).; The PM2.5 samplers used were GK2.05 cyclones (KTL) with 2um pore Gelman Teflo filters, and
WINS PM2.5 impactors for personal exposure and residential outdoor samples, respectively. VOC sampling was accomplished with
Perkin Elmer Tenax-TA tubes, CO Enhanced Measurer T15s were used for CO samples, and NO2 passive sampling badges were
used to sample NO2. No residential outdoor CO or NO2 samples were taken.
PM2.5
PM2.5
PM2.5
Ag Cr Mn Si; Al Cu Na Sm; As Fe Ni Sn; Ba Ga P Sr; Br Ge Pb Ti; Ca Hg Rb Tl; Cd I S Tm; CI K Sb V; Co Mg Se Zn; Zr
Both the indoor and outdoor environments have sources that elevated the indoor concentrations in a different extent, in turn led to
higher personal exposures to various pollutants.; Geometric mean (GM) of personal and home indoor levels of PM2.5,14 elements,
total VOC (TVOC) and 8 individual compounds were over 20% higher than their GM outdoor levels. Those of NO2, 5 aromatic
VOCs, and 5 other elements were close to their GM outdoor levels. For PM2.5 and TVOC, personal exposures and residential indoor
levels (in GM) were about 2 times higher among the tobacco-smoke exposed group compared to the non-smoke exposed group,
suggesting that smoking is an important determinant of these exposures. Determinants for CO were visualized by real-time
monitoring and that the peak levels of personal exposure to CO were associated with smoking, cooking and transportation
activities. Moderate to good correlations were only found between the personal exposures and residential indoor levels for both
PM2.5 (r = 060; p< 0 001) and NO2 (r = 047; p = 0 003).
Laietal. (2004,156666)
Study Design Longitudinal exposure assessment
Period January 4-14, 2001
Location Taipei, Taiwan; (highway toll station)
Population Highway toll station workers
Age Groups 19.3-43.6 yr; mean = 25.7 ± 5.71
Indoor Source Indirect exposure assessment was based on information on (a) lane-specific traffic density (available for all lanes throughout the
study period), (b) estimated relationships between lane- and shift-specific traffic density and the average PM2.5 concentrations, and
(c) information on time periods spent by individuals in different working environments.
July 2009
A-263
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Personal Method Direct exposure assessments were conducted by installing battery-operated personal PM2.5 monitors (University Research
Glassware Corp.) in the booth near the breathing zone of the workers.
PM2.5
NR
NR
NR
Toll workers on Taipei highways are exposed high concentrations of PM2.5. Mean PM2.5 concentration per vehicle in the truck and
bus lanes was 6.4 and 3.7 times higher, respectively, than that of ticket- or car-payment car lanes. There was a statistically
significant correlation between traffic density and PM2.5 concentrations in car lanes with ticket payments and truck and bus lanes.
Wind speed and humidity had a significant inverse association withPIVks concentration in car lanes with ticket and cash payments.
Bus and truck lane was the strongest determinant of log (PM2.5). The results of this study show that personal exposure to PM2.5 can
be reliably estimated using indirect traffic approaches.
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Larson et al. (2004, 098145)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Time-series epidemiologic study
Sep 26, 2000-May 25, 2001
Seattle, Washington
"Susceptible Populations"
Time-activity diary
Harvard Personal Environmental Monitor
PM2.5
PM2.5 outside subject's residence, and inside residence
PM2.5 at Central outdoor site (downtown Seattle)
Light absorbing carbon (LAC) and trace elements
Five sources of PM2.5 identified vegetative burning, mobile emissions, secondary sulfate, a source rich in chlorine, and crustal-
derived material. The burning of vegetation (in homes) contributed more PM2.5 mass on average than any other sources in all
microenvironments.
Lee et al. (2006,098249)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Exposure assessment for instrument development
11/2003, 5/2004
Boston, MA
NR
No
A new personal respirable particulate sampler (PRPS), operating at 5L/min. Sampler is designed to collect PM0.5, PM1.0, PM2.5,
PM4.5; and PM10 as well as O3, SO2, and NO2. Sampler consists of 5 impaction stages, a backup filter, and two diffusion passive
samplers. Particles are collected onto a polyurethane foam (PUF) substrate.
NR
NR
PM>10, PM10-2.5, PM2.5
NR
In the field, the PM10, PM2.5, and sulfate concentrations measured by PRPS were in a very good agreement with those obtained from
the; reference samplers.; In the lab, the size distributions measured by the PRPS were found to be much closer to those; measured
by the real-time particle sizing instruments than to those measured by the MOI.
Lee et al. (2006,188450)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Cross-sectional
NR, but prior to 2006
Charleston, Ottawa, Clarksville, Ohio
Farmers
NR, but prior to 2006
Hogs, poultry, cattle, feed, bedding
The dust & microorganisms passed thru an optical particle counter and a filter sampler to collect airborne microorganisms.
0.7-1 pm; 1-2 pm; 2-3 pm; 3-5 pm; 5-10 pm; Total dust
NR
NR
Fungal spores and bacteria
The highest contribution of large particles (3-10 pm) in total particles was found during grain harvesting. In animal confinements the
particles were dominated by smaller particles <3 pm. A high proportion of the particles between 2 and 10 pm were fungal spores.
Lewne et al. (2006,189293)
Study Design Personal exposure study to investigate the occurrence of systematic differences in the PE exposure to motor exhaust and to study if
these are influenced by the choice of exposure indicator gaseous or particulate
July 2009
A-264
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Components)
Primary Findings
Sep 1997 to Oct 1999
Stockholm, Sweden
Taxi, bus, and lorry drivers
NR
NR
PM was measured with a logging instrument Data-RAM, using nephelometric monitoring (Data-RAM measures PM 0.1 to 10 pm)
PM10
NR
PM10
NR
N02
1) Lorry drivers experienced the highest exposure and taxi drivers the lowest with bus drivers in an intermediate position, regardless
of whether NO2 or particles were used as exposure indicator; 2) The levels of both NO2 and particles were higher for bus drivers in
the city than for them driving in the suburbs; 3) Using diesel or petrol as a fuel for taxis had no influence on the exposure for the
drivers, indicating that the taxi drivers' exposure mainly depends on exhaust from surrounding traffic.
Lewne et al. (2007,156690)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
7 groups of occupations defined by common or high exposure to DE
Oct 2002-June 2004
Stockholm, Sweden
Persons exposed to DE
Vehicle exhaust
Pump units and gravitmetric for PM1& PM2.5 and real-time monitoring of elemental carbon and total carbon. Diffusive samplers for
NO2 as an indicator of the gas phase of exhaust.
PM1, PM2.5, and DataRAM (PM0.1-10)
NR
NR
elemental carbon (EC), total carbon (TC)
Tunnel construction workers had the highest levels of exposure for all indicators, followed by diesel-exposed garage workers. The
other 5 groups were significantly lower with no difference between the groups.
Li et al. (2003, 047845)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Primary Findings
Concurrent 10-min avg indoor and outdoor concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 were recorded for 2 days each in 10 homes with
swamp coolers
Summer 2001
El Paso, Texas
Cooking, cleaning, walking
NR
NR
PM2.5 and PM10; indoor and outdoor; tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM) instruments. 2 days were monitored for
PM2.5, and2forPMio.
NR
NR
Evaporative coolers were found to act as PM filters, creating indoor concentrations approximately 40% of outdoor PM10 and 35% of
outdoor PM2.5, regardless of cooler type.
Liao et al. (2006,188451)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Case study
January 18-27, 2003
Changhwa, Central Taiwan
Traditional Taiwanese residences
Chinese style cooking, incense burning, cleaning, and people's moving
A portable laser dust monitor (DM1100) was used to analyze the indoor and outdoor PM characteristics. The DM1100 was placed in
a single indoor location, 1.5 m above the floor, adjacent to areas of the kitchen, altar, and living room where the housing activities
occurred.
NR
PMo.5-5
PMo.5-5
NR
Results indicate that only 2.6-8% of indoor particles are from outdoor sources. Both indoor and outdoor PM concentrations increase
with PM size intervals, as do the deposition rates from cooking events; Authors suggest that "results revealed that cooking and
incense burning events were major contributors to indoor concentrations for the particle sizes 1-5 pm. Results demonstrated the
importance of knowing the time-activity data and the real-time indoor and outdoor particle size distribution information for
July 2009
A-265
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
understanding exposure to particles of indoor sources. More importantly, this research illustrates that an exposure assessment
based on PM0.5-5 measured indoors can provide valuable information on the fate of indoor particles and hazard to human health."
Liu etal. (2003,073841)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Part of a larger exposure assessment and health effect panel study
Winter 2000-2001 and spring 2001
Seattle, WA
Children with asthma
6-13 yr
NR
Personal PM2.5 measurements were collected from each subject using the Harvard personal environmental monitors.
PM2.5
PM2.5
PM2.5
NR
The ambient-generated component of PM2.5 exposure was consistently associated with increases in eNO and the indoor-generated
component was less strongly associated with eNO. As a result, the eNO results support the hypothesis that PM2.5 of outdoor origin
could be more potent per unit mass than particles of indoor origin. However, the lung function data indicate that PM2.5 of indoor
origin might be more potent per unit mass in resulting in decrements of lung functions, although the results across functional tests
were not consistent. The authors tentatively concluded that partitioning personal exposure into indoor- versus outdoor-generated
particles is useful in understanding the health effects of sources of personal PM2.5 and that the effects of indoor- versus outdoor-
generated particles differ for different health points.
Liu etal. (2005,156704)
Study Design Exposure assessment, validation set within a prospective occupational cohort (boiler workers)
Period NR (healthy working adults)
Population
Personal Method Yes, A personal environmental monitor (PEM, Model 200, MSP Co, Shoreview, MN) with a pump at 4L/min
Personal Size PM10
Microenvironment Size PM10
Ambient Size NR
Components) Metals Vanadium (V), Nickel (Ni), Iron (Fe), Chromium (Cr), Cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), Manganese (Mn)
Primary Findings The validation demonstrated good approximations of actual exposures with differences less than 5% for PM.
Liu etal. (2003,073841)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Primary Findings
Comprehensive exposure assessment
1999-2001
Seattle, WA
High-risk sub populations
Children 6-13 yr; elderly 65-90 yr (one person was below 65 but not specified)
Personal PM2.5 exposures were determined using the Harvard Personal Environmental Monitor for PM2.5 (HPEM2.5). Each subject
carried an HPEM2.sin the breathing zone for 24 h, except while sleeping, showering, or using the restroom. The monitor was
attached to the shoulder strap of either a backpack or a fanny pack that contained the air pump. When the monitor was not worn, it
was placed at an elevation of 3-5 feet (e.g., on a table) close to the subjects.; The indoor and outdoor PM concentrations were
measured with single-stage inertial Harvard Impactors (HI) and 37 mm Teflon filters for PM«and PM2.5. One HI2.5-HI10 pair was
located inside each home in the main activity room and connected to a Medo pump (model vp0935a). Concurrently, one HI2.5-HI10
pair was located outside each home and connected to a Gast pump (model DOA-V191-AA). All HI sampling periods were for 24 h
at a flow rate of 10 L/min. HI2.5, Hho, and HPEM2.5 were also co-located with the federal reference method monitor for PM2.5 (FRM2.5)
at the central Beacon Hill site, which is located in a semiresidential area (elevation, 300 feet) and is maintained by the Washington
State Department of Ecology.
PM2.5; PM10
PM2.5; PM10
PM2.5; PM10
The average personal exposures to PM2.5 were similar to the average outdoor PM2.5 concentrations but significantly higher than the
average indoor concentrations. Indoor and outdoor PM2.5, PM10, and the ratio of PM2.5 to PM10 were significantly higher during the
heating season. The increase in outdoor PM10 in winter was primarily due to an increase in the PM2.5 fraction. A similar seasonal
variation was found for personal PM2.5. The children in the study experienced the highest indoor PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations.
Personal PM2.5 exposures varied by study group, with elderly healthy and CHD subjects having the lowest exposures and asthmatic
children having the highest exposures. Within study groups, the PM2.5 exposure varied depending on residence because of different
particle infiltration efficiencies; PM2.5 exposures among the COPD and CHD subjects can be predicted with relatively good power
with a microenvironmental model composed of three microenvironments. The prediction power is the lowest for the asthmatic
children.
July 2009
A-266
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Lonati etal. (2005,126171)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Comparison sampling of an urban background site, UB during cold season and warm season with no traffic and a vehicle tunnel
(TU) cold season.
Aug 2002-Nov 2003
Milan, Italy
Urban population
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
PM2.5
EC, OC, Particulate organic matter (OM); Total mass; Chloride, Nitrate, Sulfate, Ammonium, Crustal elements, Metals,
undefined+F12
Higher PM2.5 during the cold season, about twice the warm season. Tunnel data are 7 times the urban background. The vehicle
contribution to PM2.5 is 11 % in the warm season and 6% in the cold season.
Lung etal. (2007,156719)
Period
Location
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Weekdays between Nov 1998 and Feb 1999
6 communities in Taiwan, China 2 in Taipei, 2 in Taichung, and 2 in Kaohsiung. Sites are industrial, commercial, residential and
mixed.
18 to >70
Being in kitchen, park, major boulevard, stadium, incense burning, household work, factory, environmental tobacco smoke, traffic,
ventilation conditions
Personal Environmental Monitor with a SKC personal pump at 2 L/min, 37 mm Teflon filters
PM10
PM10
PM10
None
Outdoor rather than indoor levels contributed significantly to personal exposure.; Important factors include time spend outdoors and
on transportation, riding a motorcycle, passing by factories, cooking or being in the kitchen, incense burning at home.
Magari et al. (2002,034813)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Cross-sectional study of boilermakers
NR
NR
NR, probably metal tradesmen
No
Gil-Air 5 personal pump
PM2.5
NR
NR
V, Nr, Cr, Mn, Cu, Pb
There were statistically significant mean increase in the standard deviation of the normal-to-normal heart rate index (SDNN) of 11.30
msec and 3.98 msec for every 1 pg/m3 increase in the lead and vanadium concentrations after adjusting for mean heart rate, age,
and smoking status.
Maitre etal. (2002,156726)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Personal (occupational) and ambient (in traffic area) PM and particle-bound PAH exposure assessment. This study evaluates
individual airborne exposure to gaseous and particulate carcinogenic pollutants in a group of policemen working close to traffic in
the center of Grenoble, France.
Summer (June); winter (January) (year not indicated)
City of Grenoble, located in the southeast of France
Non-smoking policemen working outdoors on foot
NR
NR
Cyclone and filter with personal sampling pump (SKC, United Kingdom)
Respirable particles (defined in this paper as the mass of particles that pass through a size selective orifice with a 50% collection
efficiency at a cut-off aerodynamic diameter of 4 pm)
NR
Respirable particles (defined in this paper as the mass of particles that pass through a size selective orifice with a 50% collection
efficiency at a cut-off aerodynamic diameter of 4 pm)
July 2009
A-267
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Components) PAH, benxene-toluene-xylenes (BTX), aldehydes; Personal BaP; Personal PAHc; Personal PAH; Personal Benzene; Personal
Toluene; Personal Xylene; Personal BTX; Personal Formaldehyde; Personal Acetaldehyde; Personal Aldehydes; Stationary BaP;
Stationary PAHc; Stationary PAH; Stationary Benzene; Stationary Toluene; Stationary Xylene; Stationary BTX; Stationary
Formaldehyde; Stationary Acetaldehyde; Stationary Aldehydes
Primary Findings The occupational exposure of policemen does not exceed any currently applicable occupational or medical exposure limits.
Individual particulate levels should preferably be monitored in Grenoble in winterto avoid underestimations.
Malm at al. (2005,156729)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Primary Finding(s)
Exposure assessment, characterization of physical and optical properties of carbonaceous aerosol species, and comparison of
several semi-continuous monitoring systems
July 15-September 4, 2002
Yosemite National Park at the Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) monitoring site
Different monitoring instruments to quantify ambient aerosol concentrations
NR
No personal exposure assessment was conducted
NR
NR
NR
Inorganic ions (sulfate, nitrate), organic carbon in PM10 and PM2.5 size ranges, elemental carbon
70% of the organic mass was made up of elemental carbon. 24-h bulk measurements of various aerosol species compared more
favorably with each other than with the semi-continuous data.; Semi-continuous sulfate (PILS) correlated well with 24-h measurem
Mar at al. (2005,087566)
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
1999-2001
Seattle, WA USA
"Older subjects" (< 57 y/o), non-smokers
Age 57+ yr
No
Harvard impactor
PM2.5
PM2.5, PM10
PM2.5, PM10
NR
Healthy subjects; taking no medications had decreases in heart rate associated with; indoor and outdoor PM2.5 and PM10. Healthy
subjects on medication; had small increases in systolic blood pressure associated with indoor; PM2.5 and outdoor PM10.
McCormack, et al. (2007,156745)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Primary Findings
Stratified analysis of subjects in the BIESAK study
NR but < 2003
East Baltimore, Maryland
low-income children with asthma
2-6 yr
sweeping, vacuuming, smoking, stove use, burned food, oven, candles/incense, open windows, space heater
NR
NR
PM10 and PM2.5; in child's bedroom
PM10 and PM2.5; central monitoring site
Indoor concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 were twice as high as the ambient; Sweeping, smoking, and ambient PM contributed
significantly to higher indoor concentrations. Sweeping (not vacuuming) increased the PM10 by 3-4 pg/m3.
Meng et al. (2005,081194)
Study Design 3 Cohorts, one in New Jersey, 1 in Los Angeles, and 1 in Houston.; Personal, home indoor, and home outdoor samples taken for
PM2.5.
Period Summer, 1999-spring, 2001
Location Houston, Texas; Los Angeles, California; and Elizabeth, New Jersey
Population
Personal Method MSP monitors on the front strap of the sampling bag near the breathing zone. Pump, battery, and motion sensor were on the hip or
back.
Personal Size PM2.5
Microenvironment Size PM2.5
Ambient Size NR
Components) NR
July 2009
A-268
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Primary Findings The median contribution of ambient sources to indoor PM2.5 using the mass balance approach was 56% for all study homes, 63% for
California, 52% for New Jersey, and 33% for Texas.
Meng at al.. (2005, 081194)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Evaluation of the use of central-site PM, rather than actual exposure, in PM epidemiology
Summer 1999-spring 2001
3 cities: Houston (TX), Los Angeles County (CA), and Elizabeth (NJ)
People suffering from cardiovascular and respiratory morbidity likely. Not specified
All age groups possible, not specified
Likely sources mentioned, not identified
NR. Indoor and outdoor sampling conducted
PM2.5
NA
NR
EC, OC, S, Si
Use of central-site PM2.5 as an exposure surrogate underestimates the bandwidth of the distribution of exposures to PM of ambient
origin.
Meng etal. (2005,058595)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
RIOPA study matched indoor home & outdoor exposure assessment
May-October (hot); November-April (cool); (1999-2001)
Los Angeles County, CA; Elizabeth, NJ; Houston, TX
Non-smoking homes
Combustion (primary); atmospheric (secondary); sulfate, organics, nitrates; mechanically (abrasion) generated.
Filter (not specified)
NR
Indoor home.; PM2.5
PM2.5, outdoor home
Organic and elemental carbon; 24 elements (metals).
Mihaltan et al. (2006,156761)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Indoor air monitoring. To assess the effect of smoking on air quality in hospitality venues (restaurant, pubs and bars).
NR
Romania
Restaurant/pubs/bars
NA
Smoking
Personal aerosol monitor
NR
Respirable suspended particles, PM2.5
NR
NR
Hospitality venues allowing indoor smoking are significantly more polluted than indoor smoke-free venues and outdoor air in
Romania.
Miller etal. (2007,156765)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Exposure Assessment, evaluation study of effectiveness and accuracy of a nephelometer (portable, direct reading photometer) to
measure tailpipe emissions of elemental carbon from diesel engines
NR
In laboratory
2 Exposure assessment methods to measure elemental carbon
NR
NR
No personal exposure assessment was conducted.
NR
NR
NR
EC, Total Carbon
EC measurements made with a Thermo Electron Personal DataRAM 1200 direct reading nephelometer showed good correlation
with EC mass concentrations quantified by thermal optical analysis of PM2.5 and PM1 samples collected on quartz filters (reference
NIOS
July 2009
A-269
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Miller etal. (2007,156764)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Comprehensive study of key contaminants
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
NR
NR
NR
PM2.5 and PM10 filter samples were collected in the living room of each home for 7 days, using SKC sampler model 200 PEM on
tared teflon filters. Concurrent PM2.5 samples were collected on 47-mm Teflo 2- pm filters with MiniVol air samplers mounted on a
tripod ~2 m in front of the house. Particulate samples for analysis of airborne endotoxin, ergosterol, and 31, 3-D-glucan were
collected on a three-piece cartridge equipped with an endotoxin-free polycarbonate filter in the living room sand bedrooms of each
home. In the living room, samplers were located at a height between 1.22 m and 1.83 m from the floor and no closer than 0.5 m to
surfaces. In bedrooms, the samples were collected form as close to the beds as feasible. BC concentrations were continuously
recorded for 7 days with a Magee Scientific Aethalometer in the living room of each house.
NR
PM2.5; PM10
NR
BC; Also assessed: Endotoxin; Ergosterol; Glucan; Dust samples Dust >300; Der p1; Der f1; Fel d1;
Airborne concentrations of the contaminants measured generally were unremarkable, although the mass of settled dust per square
meter was well above that associated with increased asthma and comfort symptoms clinical response, particularly in urban homes.
When co-occurrence of inflammatory agents and dust mite allergen burdens in the houses was considered, three homes had higher
relative amounts of the agents considered. Based on what is known about clinical interactions between, for example, endotoxin and
dust mite allergens, a combined exposure possibly results in an increased relative risk of allergic disease.
Molnaretal. (2005,156772)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Indoor/outdoor exposure assessment related to domestic wood burning
10 February to 12 March 2003
Hagfors, Sweden
Adult residents of Haqfors
NR
NR
Identical sets of equipment were used for both personal exposure and indoor sampling a GK2.05 (KTL) cyclone connected to a BGI
400S Personal Sampling Pump with a flow rate of 4 I min 1. Each person was equipped with an easily carried shoulder bag with the
cyclone and pump attached to it. The cyclone was attached to the shoulder strap and placed near the breathing zone. The personal
sampler was worn all day, and at night it was placed next to the stationary indoor sampler in the living room, owing to the noise of
the pump.; Two different types of impactors were used for the outdoor sampling one Sierra Andersen series 240, dichotomous
virtual impactorthat separates particles into two size ranges, coarse and fine particles (PM10-2.5 and PM2.5, respectively); and one
EPA-WINS impactor (PQ100 EPA-WINS Basel PM2.5 Sampler) for collecting PM2.5 particles. The outdoor measurements were
made at a single location on the roof of a single car garage, belonging to one of the subjects, in the middle of the study area.
PM2.5
PM10-2.5; PM2.5
PM10-2.5; PM2.5
BS; S; CI; K; Ca; Mn; Fe; Cu; Zn; Br; Rb; Pb
Statistically significant contributions of wood burning to personal exposure and indoor concentrations have been shown for K, Ca,
and Zn. Increases of 66-80% were found for these elements, which seem to be good wood-smoke markers. In addition, CI, Mn, Cu,
Rb, Pb, and BS were found to be possible wood-smoke markers, though not always to a statistically significant degree for personal
exposure and indoor concentrations. For some of these elements subgroups of wood burners had clearly higher levels which could
not be explained by the information available. Sulfur, one of the more typical elements mentioned as a wood-smoke marker,
showed no relation to wood smoke in this study due to the large variations in outdoor concentrations from LDT air pollution. This
was also the case for PM2.5 mass. Personal exposures and indoor levels correlated well among the subjects for all investigated
species, and personal exposures were generally higher than indoor levels. The correlations between the outdoor and personal or
ind
Molnaretal. (2006,156773)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Cross-sectional
Autumn and spring in 2002 and 2003
Goteborg, Sweden,
Persons living in urban settings
20 subjects 20-50 yr randomly selected from the population and 10 from departmental colleagues.
Nr
The volunteer subjects had a small shoulder bag with one PM2.5 cyclone and a pump attached. Intake was in the breathing zone.
Pump was carried during the day and placed next to the indoor cyclone during the night.; Ten subjects from their staff wore 2 sets
of sampling equipment near the breathing zone. A GK2.05 cyclone for PM2.5 and a Triplex cyclone for PMiin a small shoulder bag.
PM2.5 and PM1
NR
July 2009
A-270
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Ambient Size NR
Components) S; CI; K; Ca; Ti; V; Mn; Fe; Ni Cu; Zn Br Pb.
Primary Findings PM2.5 personal exposures were significantly higher than both outdoor and urban background for the elements CI, K, Ca, Ti, Fe, and
Cu.; Personal exposure was also higher tan indoor levels of CI, Ca, Ti, Fe, and Br, but lower than outdoor Pb. Residential outdoor
levels were significantly higher than the corresponding indoor levels for Br and Pb, but lower for Ti and Cu. The residential levels
were also significantly higher than the urban background for most elements.
Molnar et al. (2007,
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
156774)
Microenvironmental monitoring of PM and elements in 10 schools, 10 preschools, and 20 non-smoking homes.
1 Dec 2003- 1 July 2004
Stockholm, Sweden
Children
6-11 yr (no pre-school children) but sampling was conducted at 10 preschools.
Smoking, gas stoves,
NR
NR
NR
NR
S; K; Ca; Ti; V; Cr; Mn; Fe; Ni; Cu; Zn; Br; Pb
Significantly lower indoor concentrations of S, Ni, Br and Pb, elements from long-range transported air masses, were found in all
locations. Only Ti was significantly higher indoors in all locations, probably because of Ti02 in paint pigment. Similar differences
were found during both seasons for homes and schools. At preschools the infiltration of the long-range transported elements S, Br
and Pb was lower in winter than in spring, and also the crustal elements Ti, Mn and Fe had higher indoor concentrations during
spring. There were spatial differences outdoors, with significantly lower concentrations of elements of crustal and traffic origin in the
background area community.
Monkkonen et al. (2005,156775)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Human exposure assessment in homes in India
Nagpur Mar to Oct 2002; Mysore Aug to Dec 2002
Nagpurand Mysore, India
Residential homes in India
NR
Yes; cooking w/ kero. and LPG; Toaster; Burning incense; Infiltration of outdoor air; Burning coconut husks
TSI Condensation Particle Counter Model 3007 (CPC counts all particles >10 nm); TSI Model 8520 Dust Trak; PM2.5 Environmental
Monitor with Whatman PTFE membrane filters and gravimetric analysis
PM2.5 for mass (pg/m3); Total PM for counts (particles/cm3)
PM2.5 for mass (pg/m3); Total PM for counts (particles/cm3)
Total PM for counts (particles/cm3)
NR
The maximum concentrations observed in most cases were due to indoor combustion sources. Besides cooking stoves that use
LPG or kerosene as the main fuel, high indoor concentrations can be explained by poor ventilation systems.
Mwaiselage et al. (2006,156789)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Cross-sectional; personal monitoring. To determine the effects of cement exposure on acute respiratory health.
June-August 2001
Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Cement factory workers
NR
Cement production
Cellulose Acetate Filter, Sidekick pump
Respirable dust, total dust
NR
NR
Ca, Al, Fe, K
Results of Cox Regression analysis showed that prevalence ratios for cough, short breathness and stuffy nose for high exposed
workers in the production department compared to low exposed workers in the low exposed workers working in the maintenance
department and the administration building are 6.7, 4.5 and 1.9 respectively. Cross shift decrease in PEF was more in the higher
among high exposed workers (7.6%) than low exposed workers (2.7%). The observed acute acute respiratory health effects are
most likely related to exposure of workers to high concentrations of irritant cement dust.
Na and Cocker (2005,156790)
Study Design
Human exposure assessment
Period Sept. 2001 -January 2002
July 2009
A-271
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Mira Loma, CA
Residential homes and a hiqh school
NR
Indoor EC (elemental carbon) concentrations primarily of outside origin; Indoor PM2.5 significantly influenced by indoor OC (organic
carbon) sources, including indoor smoking.
PM2.5 Particle trap impactor with 47 mm Teflo substrates; EC/OC Particle trap impactor with 47 mm QAT Tissuquartz quartz
fiber filter, analysis by thermal.optical carbon aerosol analyzer (NIOSH Method 5040)
PM2.5
NR
PM2.5
EC (Elemental carbon); OC (Organic carbon)
Indoor PM2.5 was significant influenced by indoor OC sources. Indoor EC sources were predominantly of outdoor origin.
Naumova et al. (2002, 026105)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Exposure assessment
6/1999-5/2000
Los Angeles County, CA; Houston, TX; Elizabeth, NJ
US. General population
NR
No
None-area sampling only (in home and outdoors)
NR
PM2.5
PM2.5
PAH (total and specific)
See Component Column. Many of the study findings pertain to combined particle-bound and gas-phase PAHs, and are not
presented here.
Naumova et al. (2003, 089213)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
RIOPA Study-PAH partitioning indoor and outdoor. To evaluate the hypothesis that outdoor air pollution contributed strongly to
indoor air pollution.
July 1999-June 2000
Los Angeles, CA, Houston, TX, Elizabeth, NJ
Houses
NR
NR
Modified MSP Samplers, 37 mm quartz filter
NR
Filter, PM2.5
Filter, PM2.5
Organic Carbon (OC), Elemental Carbon (EC)
Multiple linear regression (MLR) log PAH particulate partition coefficient (kp) vs log vapor pressure coefficient (std) 0.888 (0.009)
fraction of elemental carbon in PM coefficient (std) 3.686 (0.238) fraction of elemental carbon in PM coefficient (std) 0.469 (0.055)
temperature coefficient (std) -0.0456 (0.002) intercept (std) 8.398 (0.604) R2 = 0.845. Both EC and OC carbon are important
predictors of gas/particle partitioning of PAHs, with EC being a better predictor. Because EC is highly correlated with (and is a good
tracer of) primary combustion-generated OC, this result suggests that PAHs more readily sorb on combustion-generated aerosol
containing EC. Enrichment of the indoor aerosol in nin-combustion OC suggests that sorption of PAHs is more important in the
indoor air compared to the outdoor air. The MLR developed in this work will improve prediction of gas/particle partitioning of PAHs
in indoor and outdoor air.
Nerriere et al. (2005,088630)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Exposure assessment
2001 -2003; Lung cancer mortality 1999
4 French Cities (Grenoble, Paris, Rouen, Strasbourg)
6-13 y/o children not exposed to passive smoke; 30-71 y/o adults (average age ~40y/o) not occupational^ exposed
yes, using Harvard Chempass worn in a backpack
PM2.5
NR
PM2.5
NR
Number of cases attributable to PM2.5 exposure (95% CI); attributable Fraction (%) (95% CI) Paris 303 (42-553); 8 (1 -16); Grenoble
12 (3-22); 10 (3-19); Rouen 19 (3-35); 10 (2-19); Strasbourg 43 (7-71); 24 (4-10).
July 2009
A-272
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Nerriere et al. (2005,089481)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Copollutant(s)
Primary Findings
Exposure assessment, stratified sampling of children and adults in 3 environments high traffic emissions, local industrial sources,
and urban background.
"Hot" season May-June and "cold" season Feb-Mar. Grenoble in 2001, Paris in 2002, Rouen in 2002-2003, Strasbourg 2003.
Grenoble, Paris, Rouen, and Strasbourg, France
Persons living, working, or going to school in 3 urban areas one highly exposed to traffic emissions, one influenced by local
industrial sources, and a background urban environment. Industrial sources of pollution were present in each city.
6-13 yr and 20-71 yr. All non-smokers and not exposed to environmental tobacco smoke or industrial air pollution.
Daily activity diaries used to do
Rucksack with Harvard ChemPass
PM2.5, PM10
NR
PM2.5, PM10
NO2
The difference between ambient air concentrations and average total exposure is pollutant specific. PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations
underestimate population exposures across almost all cities, season, and age groups, the opposite is true for NO2.
Ng et al. (2005,155996)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Study is to model the dispersion of the 911 WTC destruction cloud to areas of the city and boroughs using "representative persons."
Input data are from extant monitoring stations throughout the area.
14 Sep., 2001 to 30 Sep., 2001
Lower Manhattan, New York City, NY
NYC residents
NR, but both adults and children
Smoking, cooking
Simulated
PM2.5
PM2.5
PM2.5
NR
Although the outdoor PM2.5 was lower than the NAAQS value, personal exposure levels were higher than outdoor and might be of
concern.
Nikasinovic et al. (2006,156807)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Copollutant(s)
Primary Findings
cross-sectional
Oct 1999-Jun 2002
Paris, France
Asthmatic children
7-14 yr
Presence of pets, smoking in the home, house dust mites, home ventilation frequency, allergies to grass, cats, pollen, gas cooking,
barometric pressure.
Active sampler in a rucksack carried by the children whenever they moved.
PM2.5
NR
PM10
Ozone
Pollutant concentrations did not differ between the 2 groups. In asthmatic children only personal PM2.5 levels were correlated to
nasal markers after adjustment for age, sex, house mites, pollens, cat, tobacco smoke, barometric pressure, and respiratory
infection.
Noullett etal (2006,155999)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Cohort
5 February to 16 March 2001
Prince George, British Columbia
Children
10-12 yr
NR, Each child completed a time activity diary every 30 min on the days that they carried the monitor. A motion sensor (HOBO,
Onset Computer Corporation) was also placed in each pack and data from the sensor was downloaded each morning and then
compared to each child's time activity diary as a quality assurance measure.
PM2.5 Harvard Personal Environment Monitors (HPEM2.5) with a PTFE Teflon filter (Pall Gelman R2PJ037) were used for both the
ambient and personal sampling. At ambient sampling sites, the HPEM2.5 was suspended approximately 4 ft above the school
rooftop (20 ft from the ground at all schools), connected to a large flow controlled pump and situated in an open area on the roof
free of air vents, exhausts or intakes. BGI air sampling pumps and battery packs (BGI-400S and BGI-401) were used for the
July 2009
A-273
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
personal monitoring and were contained in a child-size backpack. The sampler was attached to the strap of the backpack in the
breathing zone of the child with the inlet facing downwards and protected by a 4-in piece of plastic tubing. Subjects were required to
wear the pack whenever possible and otherwise to keep the pack close to them and as close to their breathing zone as possible
PM2.5
NR
PM2.5
SO4; ABS (light absorbing carbon)
In Prince George, a combination of topography, meteorological conditions and location of ambient sources resulted in episodic
levels of fine PM during the short study period in the winter of 2001. Thermal inversions were moderately associated with both high
ambient levels and personal exposures and were likely responsible for the spatial variation and, in combination with wind, the
temporal variation in ambient concentrations throughout the city. The clear link between thermal inversions and both high ambient
levels and measured personal exposures during PM2.5 episodes support management strategies to reduce ambient sources during
periods of limited dispersion in an effort to reduce exposure levels. Despite the significant spatial variation found in ambient levels
throughout the city for all three measures, there was a high correlation between the outdoor sites suggesting that a single monitor
would represent temporal trends. Similar to the findings in other studies, both sulfate and light
O'Neill et al. (2004, 087429)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Time-series epidemiologic study of PMio-associated mortality, comparison of different samplers
January 1,1994-December 30,1998
5 sites in Mexico City, Mexico
Urban environments
NR
NR
No personal exposure assessment was conducted
NR
NR
PM10, PM2.5
NR
PM10 levels were higher in the winter. PM10 levels measured using different methods were not well correlated with each other. Re-
analysis of associations between PM2.5 and mortality with sensitivity analyses (non-parametric modeling) produced lower eff
Offenberg et al. (2004,156821)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Exposure assessment
6/1999-5/2000
Los Angeles County, CA; Houston, TX; Elizabeth, Nj
US. General population
NR
No
None-area sampling only (in home and outdoors)
NR
PM2.5
PM2.5
Chlordane
Geometric mean particle-bound chlordane concentrations were higher indoors relative to outdoors, suggesting indoor sources.
Ogulei et al. (2006,156823)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Exposure Assessment
11/1999-3/2000
Reston, VA
US homes
NR
Yes. Nine primary sources of PM were identified gas burner; use (boiling water), deep-frying tortillas and miscellaneous; cooking of
dinner, burning of citronella candle, combined gas burner and gas oven use (broiling salmon), sweeping/vacuuming, use of electric
toaster; oven, traffic, wood smoke, and pouring of kitty litter.
None
NR
A range 0.01-20.0 mm
NR
NR
Each particle source identified in the study produces distinct particle size distributions.
Pang etal. (2002,037057)
Study Design Field test of prototype Personal Particulate Organic and Mass Sampler
July 2009
A-274
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
November 2000-May 2001
Seattle, WA
NR
NR
NR
Outdoor sampling for PM2.5 massThe PPOMS was co-located with two Federal Reference Method (FRM) samplers and a HPEM
sampler at the Beacon Hill EPA Air Quality and Particulate Speciation Monitoring Site. Samples were collected on each sample day
for 24 h, starting at 0:00 PST. Indoor sampling for particulate carbon the PPOMS was co-located with an integrated particle sampler
and a Harvard impactor (HI2.5) inside of two residences. Five samples were collected at each house over the course of several
days.
NR
NR
PM2.5
EC; OC
"This study shows that the PPOMS design provides a 2.5 pm size-selective inlet that also prevents the adsorption of gas-phase
SVOC onto quartz filters, thus eliminating the filter positive artifacts. The PPOMS meets a significant current challenge for indoor
and personal sampling of particulate organic carbon. The PPOMS design can also simplify accurate ambient sampling for PM2.5."
Paschold etal. (2003,156847)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Concurrent 48-h indoor and outdoor concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 in 10 homes with swamp coolers
Summer of 2001
El Paso, Texas
Homes with evaporative coolers
NR
NR
NR
NR
PM10 and PM2.5
NR
Geologic material; Sodium; Magnesium; Aluminum; Potassium; Calcium; Titanium; Manganese; Iron; Trace metals; Copper; Zinc;
Barium; Lead
Indoor elemental concentrations in PM10 were approximately 50-70% lower than outdoor concentrations in 9 of 10 homes,
consistent with the PM10 indoor/outdoor (I/O) mass concentrations previously reported. PM2.51/ O ratio correlations were not as
strong as for PM10; however, reduced correlations could be attributed to a pattern of recurring outlier data pairs, consisting of the
same 3 or 4 elements in all 10 homes.
Polidori et al. (2007,156877)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
time-series epidemiologic study
Site A (Group 1 [G1 ]); -Phase 1 July 6 to August 20, 2005; -Phase 2 October 19 to December 10, 2005; Site B Group 2 [G2]); -
Phase 1 August 24 to October 15, 2005; -Phase 2 January 4 to February 18, 2006
Los Angeles, California (Two Retirement homes)
Elderly residents of Los Angeles, California retirement homes
NR
No
Two identical sampling stations were installed at each location, one indoors and one outdoors. The indoor sampling station at site A
was located in the recreational area of the first community's main building, adjacent to a construction site where work was ongoing.
The indoor sampling area at site B was situated in the dining room of the second community's main building. At both sites, the
outdoor station, set up inside a movable trailer, was positioned within 300m from the indoor station. Two D-attenuation mass
monitors (BAMS) (Model 1020) were used at each indoor and outdoor sampling station to measure hourly PM2.5 mass
concentrations. Continuous NO, NO2, and CO measurements were taken indoors and outdoors using Thermo Environmental NOX
analyzers (Model 42), and Dasibi CO Analyzers (Model 3008) respectively. O3 concentrations were also monitored at each
sampling station by using API Ozone Analyzers (Model 400A). At both indoor and outdoor sampling areas, a water-based
condensation particle counter (CPC model 3785), and a semicontinuous OC-EC analyzer (Model 3F) were operated side by side. A
modified National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) analysis protocol was used here to evolve particulate OC
and EC.
NR
PM2.5
PM2.5, PN
OC; EC; OC1;OC2-4
Measured indoor and outdoor concentrations of PM2.5, OC, EC, PN, O3, CO, and NOX were generally comparable, although at G2, a
substantial peak in indoor OC, PN, and PM2.5 (probably from cooking) was typically observed between 6:00 and 9:00 am. The study
average percentage contribution of outdoor SOA to outdoor particulate OC was 40% and varied between 40% and 45% in the
summer (during G1P1) and 32% and 40% in the winter (during G2P2). The low AERs (0.25-0.33 h-1) calculated for G1 and G2 are
consistent with the structural characteristics of the sampling sites, the low number of open windows and doors, and the presence of
central air conditioners. F«estimates were highest for EC and also for OC. Lower lvalues were obtained for PM2.5 and PN,
July 2009
A-275
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
because these compounds are composed of both volatile and nonvolatile inorganic and organic compounds. Based on a single
compartment mass balance model, it was found that 13-17% (G2P2) to 16-26% (G1P1) of measured indoor OC was emitted or
formed indoors. Although the G2 indoor site was characterized by higher indoor morning OC peaks because of cooking, the overall
contribution of indoor sources to measured indoor OC was higher at the G1 site. The modeling results also showed that the
measured indoor PM2.5 emitted or formed indoors was highly variable (from 6-21 % at G1P1 to 45-51 % at G1P2). The average
percentage contribution of indoor SOA of outdoor origin to measured indoor OC varied from -35% (at site 1) to -45% (at site 2).
Also, outdoor-generated primary OC composed, on average, 36-44% of measured indoor OC during G2P1 and G1P1 respectively.
Poupard etal. (2005, 074025)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Explore relationships between indoor and outdoor air quality
NR
La Rochelle, France
School buildinqs
NR
No
GRIMM 1.108 analyzer
15 size intervals from 0.3 to 15 microns
NR
15 size intervals from 0.3 to 15 microns
NR
Influence of room occupancy on particle concentrations indoors changes with particle size; Indoor ozone and particle concentrations
are negatively correlated.
Price et al. (2003, 098082)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Exposure assessment, comparison of PM10 samplers
November 2000 to August 2001
Sunderland, England (northeast England), monitoring at curbside
Urban Populations near high traffic areas
NR
NR
No personal exposure assessment was conducted
NR
NR
PM10
NR
Correlation between TEOM and partisol appeared to be seasonal, with strongest correlation in the summer when ambient PM10
concentrations were relatively low. In the winter and spring, when PM10 levels are higher, the Partisol sampler records grea
Ramachandran et al. (2003,190112)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Matched PM2.5 24-h and 15-min averages at 9-10 residences in each of 3 communities and at 3 central sites, in 3 seasons.
The measurements were made over 3 seasons—spring (April 26-June 2), summer (June 20-August 10), and fall (September 23-
November 20) of 1999.
Phillips, East St. Paul, and Battle Creek, Metropolitan Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota
Urban residential communities
23 females, 9 males; mean age 42 ± 10, range 24-64 yr
No
NR
NR
PM2.5 in residences
At 3 central sites, PM2.5
NR
Outdoor PM2.5 concentrations across the Minneapolis- St. Paul area appear to be spatially homogeneous on a 24-h time scale as
well as on a 15-min time scale. Short-term average outdoor PM2.5 concentrations can vary by as much as an order of magnitude
within a day.
Riojas-Rodriguez et al. (2006,156913)
Study Design Panel Study
Period 12/2001-4/2002
Location Mexico City, Mexico
Population Patients with heart disease
Age Groups Avg Age 55 yr (range 25-76)
Indoor Source Nub
July 2009
A-276
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Yes, using nephelometers (personal data ram (PDR) model 1200, Monitoring Instruments for the Environment, Inc) connected to a
4L/min pump
PM2.5
NR
NR
NR
Authors found a decrease in HRV measured as high frequency (Ln) (coefficient =-0.008, 95% confidence interval (CI) to -0.015,
0.0004) for each 10 microg/m3 increase of personal PM2.5 exposure.
Robinson et al. (2007,156054)
Study Design A pollution mapping exercise was undertaken to measure average pollution levels on a number of transects across the New South
Wales Valley and the variation with height and land use was determined. Spatial variation was then used to predict population
exposure to PM2.5 pollution and the effect on health.
Period Pollution measurements were made between 17 July 1996 and 10 September 1996
Location Armidale, New South Wales, Australia
Population Armidale, New South Wales, Australia
Age Groups NA
Indoor Source NR
Personal Method A portable Radiance Research M903 integrating nephelometer was used to measure ambient air pollution at four transects; Ambient
air pollution was also measured using a fixed site Belfort nephelometer
Personal Size NR
Microenvironment Size NR
Ambient Size PM2.5
Components) NR
Primary Findings 1) Considerable variability was observed in winter woodsmoke pollution levels; 2) A small number of badly operated heaters can
have a large influence on local air quality; 3) Pollution was generally higher in residential areas; 4) Annual exposure to PM2.5
pollution in Armidale from woodsmoke was double that from all sources in Sydney.
Rojas-Bracho et al. (2004,054772)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Cohort, repeated measures. 18 COPD patients in non-smoking homes were sampled either in winter 1996 or 1997.16 of these also
were sampled in the summer. All subjects were sampled for 6 consecutive days in winter, and one or two sets of 6 consecutive
days in the summer.
1996-1997
Boston, Massachusetts
COPD patients
Housecleaning, cooking, transport in motor vehicles, low-effort home activities, moderate-effort home activities, activities in public
places, and resting or sleeping.
PEM attached to shoulder strap of a bag (near breathing zone) containing the pump and batteries.
PM2.5, PM10, & PM2.5-10
PM2.5, PM10, & PM2.5-10
NR
NR
During both seasons personal exposures were higher than indoor or outdoor means, except the winter indoor concentrations were
higher than the personal or outdoor.
Rotko et al. (2002,037240)
Study Design European multi-city air pollution study
Period Athens, Greece (A) 26 January 1997-4 June 1998; Basel, Switzerland (B) 3 February 1997-23 January 1998; Milan, Italy (M) 10
March 1997-23 May 1998; Oxford, UK (O) November 1998-7 October 1999; Prague, Czech Republic (P) 3 June 1997-4 June
1998; Helsinki, Finland (H) 26 September 1996-10 December 1997
Location Athens, Greece (A); Basel, Switzerland (B); Milan, Italy (M); Oxford, UK (O); Prague, Czech Republic (P); Helsinki, Finland (H)
Population Adults
Age Groups 25-55 yr
Indoor Source NR
Personal Method Personal PM2.5 exposures were collected on two different filters one for the working hours including commuting (personal work) and
the other for the remaining hours of 48-h measurement period (personal leisure time). In addition to personal exposure monitoring,
PM2.5 concentrations were measured in each home (indoors and outdoors) and workplace (indoors). The PM2.5 concentration
measured at work was the avg of two consecutive workdays and at home of the remaining hours of the 48-h monitoring period.
PM2.5 personal cyclones were used as pre-separators at flow rate of 4 I min 1 [this seems wrong] and the EPA-WINS impactors
were employed at 16.7 I min 1 for the microenvironment measurements with Gelman Teflo filters (37 and 47 mm, respectively).
Personal Size PM2.5
Microenvironment Size PM2.5
Ambient Size PM2.5
Copollutant(s) NO2
July 2009
A-277
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Primary Findings * There was a large variation in the levels of air pollution annoyance between the six studied cities. The highest annoyance levels
were experienced while in traffic. "The significant determinants of air pollution annoyance were the city, self-reported sensitivity to
air pollution and respiratory symptoms, downtown residence and gender of the subject.; * No consistent or significant correlations
were seen between the individual levels of annoyance and exposure concentrations to either PM2.5 or NO2. * High air pollution
annoyance in traffic, however, was significantly associated with home outdoor concentrations of both PM2.5 and NO2 and downtown
living (NO2- model). "When average annoyance levels and concentrations were averaged for each city, the perceived annoyance
levels at home correlated highly with the measured personal 48-h PM2.5 and NO2 exposures and home indoor NO2 concentration,
annoyance at work correlated with personal workday exposure and workplace PM2.5 concentrations, and annoyance in traffic wi
Salma et al. (2005,
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
156937)
2 types of samplers collected aerosols in an urban area. 23 samples were collected with each device separately for day and night.
Spring 2002
Budapest, Hungary
urban dwellers
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
See direct quote in the note below
Al; Si; Ca; Ti; Fe; CI; Zn; Na; Mn; Ni; Cu; Pb; K; S; Br
The variation in the overall size distributions and RMCs for the various elements indicated the existence of multiple sources,
including vehicular (both combustion and frictional) and industrial emissions, resuspension of road and soil dust, and long-range
transport of air masses. The significant coarse mode for some typical anthropogenic elements (Cu and Zn) and the observed
coarse mode concentration differences between daytime periods and nights (e.g., for Ca) point to the importance of frictional
sources and road dust resuspension in cities, which are both primarily related to road traffic.
Salma etal. (2007,113850)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
examination of aerosol air quality and its temporal variation in the Budapest metro
April 20 and 21,2006
Budapest, Hungary
underground metro commuters
NR
No. Air monitoring equipment consisted of a tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM), a wind monitor (Campbell), and a
laboratory-made Gent-type stacked filter unit (SFU) aerosol sampler. OM was equipped with a PM10 inlet facing upwards and was
operated with the filter heated to 401C to prevent moistening. The sampling station was ventilated without filtration by drawing air
from the opposite platform to the roof level of a 12-story building next to the station.
No personal monitoring. In situ aerosol measurement and sample collection at the metro station.
PM10-2.O and PM2.0
NA
NR
30 elements (Na, Mg, Al, Si, P, S, CI-, K, Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ga, Ge, As, Se, Br, Rb, Sr, Y, Zr, Nb, Mo, Ba, and Pb)
The concentrations observed in the Astoria underground station were clearly lower (by several orders of magnitude) than the
corresponding workplace limits.
Sanderson and Farant (2004,156942)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Indoor and outdoor air monitoring of PAH. Investigate the relationship between indoor and outdoor PAH.
NR
Canada
Residential homes in neighborhoods around aluminum smelting plant
NR
NR
Indoor quartz filter, XAD-2 Resin Outdoor glass fiber filter
NR
NR
NR
4-6 ring PAHs on indoor particle
Indoor concentration of 4-6-ring PAH linked to outdoor sources in residences without any major indoor source, but with industrial
facility as the main outdoor source. Study suggests that simultaneous measurements of indoor and outdoor concentrations of PAH
>4 rings predominantly associated with fine PM could provide useful estimates of particle infiltration efficiency.
Sarnat et al. (2006, 089166)
Study Design Outdoor-indoor pollutant infiltration, occupied residences
July 2009
A-278
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Period
Location
Population
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
July 28, 2001 -February 25, 2002
Los Anqeles, CA
NR
Yes; cleaning, cooking, home ventilation (open windows/doors), kitchen fans, air conditioner/heating usage, number of occupants,
nearby roadways
NR
NR
PM2.5, Particle number
PM2.5
BC (nonvolatile component); N03 (volatile component)
1) Infiltration rate for PM2.5 was intermediate, while BC was highest, N03 lowest; 2) Infiltration rate varied with particle size, air
exchange rate, outdoor N03; 3) PM2.5 infiltration was lowest for volatile component; 4) Outdoor volatile PM2.5 components may be
less representative of indoor exposure to volatile PM2.5 of ambient origin; 5) Outdoor nonvolatile PM2.5 components may be more
representative of indoor exposure to nonvolatile PM2.5 of ambient origin.
Sarnat et al. (2006, 090489)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Personal and ambient exposure assessment
June 14-August 18 (summer); Sep 24-Dec 15 (fall), 2000
Steubenville, OH
Non-smokinq, older adults
No
Integrated filter gravimetric measurement
PM2.5
NR
PM2.5
S04; EC
1) 24-h ambient measurements more representative of personal particle exposure than gases; 2) ventilation is an important
exposure modifier.
Sarnat et al. (2005, 087531)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Copollutant(s)
Primary Findings
Time-series epidemiologic study
Summer 1999 and winter 2000
Boston, MA. Comparisons to a previous study in Baltimore are made.
School children and seniors
NR
PM2.5
NR
PM2.5
S04,
O3, NO2, SO2
Substantial correlations between ambient PM2.5 concentrations and corresponding personal exposures.; Summertime gaseous
pollutant concentrations may be better surrogates of personal PM2.5 exposures (especially personal exposures to PM2.5 of ambient
origin) than they are surrogates of personal exposures to the gases themselves.
Sax et al. (2006,156950)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Primary Finding(s)
2 Cohorts, one in NYC and 1 in LA.; Personal, home indoor, and home outdoor samples taken for PM2.5, VOCs, and aldehydes.
1999-2000, winter and summer in NYC, winter and fall in LA.
New York City, New York, and Los Angeles, California
13-19 yr
No
Customized backpack
NR
NR
NR
NR
Most VOCs has median upper-bound lifetime cancer risks that exceeded the USEPA benchmark of 1 x 10 6 and were generally
greater that the EPA modeled estimates, more so for compounds with predominant indoor sources, chromium, nickel, and arsenic
had median personal cancer risks above the benchmark with exposures largely from outdoors and other microenvironments. The
EPA model overestimate risks for beryllium and chromium and underestimate risks for nickel and arsenic.
July 2009
A-279
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Scheepers et al. (2003,156955)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Field Study
Pilot Study; March 15-18,1999, and March 22-25,1999 (coal mine); April 12-14,1999 (oil shale mine); Main Study; June 5-22, 2000
Pilot Study; Ostrava, Czech Republic (black coal mine); Kohtla-Jarve, Estonia (oil shale mine); Main Study; Kohtla-Jarve, Estonia (oil
shale mine)
Coal miners with high exposures to Diesel-powered machinery
NR
NR
Personal sampling was accomplished by each individual worker carrying personal air sampling equipment (GSA 200 or Gillian)
during two shifts in the same work week (1 shift for the main study). The air sampling pumps operated in the breathing zones of the
individual workers and operated at an electronically controlled flow rate of 2.0l/min.; Inhalable dust samples were collected using a
sampler head developed by the Institute fur Gefahrstoff Forschung der Bergbau Berufsgenossenschaft (IGF). Respirable dust was
collected using an elutriator pre-separator type MPGII (IGF). Particles were collected on polystyrene membrane filters with a Teflon
coating. All samples were taken at a height of -1.5 m above the floor.
NR
NR
NR
1 -nitropyrene (1-NP)
This study confirms that 1-NP in black coal and oil shale mines is mostly associated with respirable particles and that mining
operations involving diesel-powered engines exposures to DEP may be 3- to 10-fold higher for underground miners than workers
on the surface. Furthermore, measurements of particle-associated 1-NP is a more sensitive and discriminating indicator o exposure
to DEP than inhalable or respirable particles because of the relatively high concentrations of mine dust in mining operations.;
Respirable dust concentration were 2- to 3-fold higher in the breathing zone than at fixed sampling locations while 1-NP
concentrations were found to be 2.5-fold and 10-fold higher in the coal mine and oil shale mine respectively. This is thought to be
due to location of fixed sampling points as well as wind and humidity levels within the mines themselves. For these reasons and
others, personal air sampling is preferred over air sampling at fixed sites.
Shalat et al. (2007,
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
156971)
Indoor home exposure assessment; sampling technology demonstration
Winter heating season
Residential home
Children
Pre-toddler (6- to 12-month-old) children
Mobile robotic and stationary. Filter and real-time nephelometer.
Floor; Filter inhalable particles (approximately < 100 pm)
Indoor home; Nephelometer total suspended particles.
NR
NR
Shao et.al. (2007,156973)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Exposure assessment
July and Winter 2003
Beijing, China
General population
NR
Soot aggregates, coal fly ash, minerals, unknown fine particles
PM10 selective inlet heads 30L/min flow rate with polycarbonate filters
PM,o
PM,o
PM,o
NR
Plasmid scission assay, coupled with the image analysis, can be used to evaluate the relationship between particle physico-
chemistry and toxicity.
Shilton et al. (2002, 049602)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Respirable particulates inside and outside of a building were collected and compared
24-h sampling from 12:45 pm Mondays to Fridays between 9/19/00 to 5/01/01
Wolverhampton city center, University of Wolverhamptom, UK
Building near traffic dominated by heavy-duty diesel vehicles
Outdoor (primary); Mn,AI, N03, CI- (wind-blown dust); Cu and Zn-(traffic emissions)
Active sampling using Casella sampler (filter)-
Respirable PM (inside and outside)
Respirable PM (inside)
July 2009
A-280
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Ambient Size Respirable PM (outside)
Components) Respirable PM, metals (Zn, Cu, Mn, Al), sulfate, nitrate, and chloride
Primary Findings The indoor particulate concentration was driven by ambient concentration; meteorological-induced changes in ambient PM were
detected indoors.
Simons et al. (2007,
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Primary Finding(s)
156982)
NR
Baltimore, Maryland; and surrounding counties
Children with asthma
Inner city-6-12 yr; Surrounding counties 6-17 yr
Gas stoves, cats, dogs, smokers, mold/mildew carpet, outside PM, dryer vents
Indoor air was collected from the child's bedroom with 4 L/min MSP impactors over a72-h Period.
NR
PM2.5; PM10
PM2.5; PM10
Allergens were also assessed Dust mite; Bla/g; Mus/m; Fel/d; Can/ f; Airborne Mus/m
Compared with the homes of suburban children with asthma, the homes of inner city Baltimore children with asthma had higher
levels of airborne pollutants (including PM, NO2 and O3 amongst others) and home characteristics that predispose to greater
asthma morbidity. In the inner city homes, median andGM PM10 levels were almost three times as high and the GM PM2.5 levels
were more than three times higher than in the suburban homes. Median GM NO2 andGM O3 levels were found in similar ratios. It is
important to note that PM10 levels were found to be markedly higher in homes on arterial streets compared to those not on arterial
streets. Although standards specific for home indoor air quality have not been established, the authors found that the inner city
children were exposed to home pollutant levels in excess of the Environmental Protection Agency's National Ambient Air Quality
standards.
Smith et al. (2006,156990)
Study Design
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Location U.S.
Trucking industry
working age
Diesel tractors, cigarette smoking, site pollution
Terminal workers had samplers in a special harness; Drivers had a sampling box placed in the cab.
PM2.5
PM2.5; Area samplers in the offices, freight dock, or shop.
PM2.5; Samplers were located in the yard upwind of the terminal.
Elemental carbon (EC); Organic carbon (OC)
Sorensen et al. (2005, 083053)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
panel study
11/1999, 8/2000
Copenhagen, Denmark
Healthy young adults, nonsmokers
20-33 yr, median age = 24yr
No
International Gravity Bureau (BGI, Toulouse; France) (Kenny and Gussman 1997), aKTL; PM2.5 cyclone (Jantunen et al. 1998), a;
BGI400 pump (BGI Inc., Waltham, MA; USA) (flow 4 L/min)
PM2.5
NR
NR
Transition metals (vanadium; chromium, iron, nickel, copper, and platinum)
The 8-oxodG concentration in; lymphocytes was significantly associated with vanadium and chromium concentrations with a 1.9%
increase in; 8-oxodG per 1 Mg/L increase in vanadium and a 2.2% increase in 8-oxodG per 1 Mg/L increase chromium.
Sorensen et al. (2003, 042700)
Study Design Epidemiologic personal exposure study
Period Autumn- November 1999; Winter- January to February 2000; spring- April to May 2000; summer- August 2000
Location Central Copenhagen
Population University students
Age Groups 20-33 yr (median = 24 yr)
Indoor Source NR
Personal Method Particles were sampled using a KTL PM2.5 cyclone developed for the European EXPOLIS study (17), a International Gravity Bureau
400 pump (4l/min), and a battery pack. The equipment was placed in a backpack, which the subjects carried or placed nearby when
they were indoor. Sampling was done on 37-mm Teflon filters.; Urban background concentrations of PM2.5 were measured on the
rooftop of a building (20 meters above the ground) on the Copenhagen University campus.
July 2009
A-281
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
PM2.5
NR
PM2.5
BS
Personal PM2.5 exposure was found to be a predictor of 8-oxodG in lymphocyte DNA. No other associations between exposure
markers and biomarkers could be distinguished. ETS was not a predictor of any biomarker in the present study. The current study
suggests that exposure to PM2.5 at modest levels can induce oxidative DNA damage and that the association to oxidative DNA
damage was confined to the personal exposure, whereas the ambient background concentrations showed no significant
association.; For most of the biomarkers and external exposure markers, significant differences between the seasons were found.
Similarly, season was a significant predictor of SBs and PAH adducts, with average outdoor temperature as an additional significant
predictor.
Sorensen et al. (2005, 089428)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Copollutant(s)
Primary Findings
Repeated measures cohort study.
Nov 1999-Aug 2000
Copenhagen, Denmark
residents of downtown Copenhagen
20-33 yr old, all non-smokers
Used a questionnaire to get time exposed to environmental tobacco smoke, burning candles, frying food, open windows
wore a backpack, or placed nearby when indoors.
PM2.5 and BS
Bedroom and front door; PM2.5 and BS
Street monitoring station and roof of a campus building; PM2.5 and BS
NO2
For NO2 there was a significant association between personal exposure and the bedroom, the front door and the background,
whereas for PM2.5 and BS only the bedroom and the front door concentrations, and not the background, were significantly
associated with personal exposure. The bedroom concentration was the strongest predictor of all three pollution measurements.
The association between the bedroom and front door concentrations was significant for all three measurements, and the
association between the front door and the background concentrations was significant for PM2.5 and NO2, but not for BS, indicating
greater spatial variation tbr BS than for PM2.5 and NO2. For NO2, the relationship between the personal exposure and the front door
concentration was dependent upon the "season," with a stronger association in the warm season compared with the cold season,
and for PM2.5 and BS the same tendency was seen. Time exposed to burning candles was a significant predictor of personal PM2.5,
BS and NO2 exposure, and time exposed to ETS only associated with personal PM2.5 exposure. These findings imply that the
personal exposure to PM2.5, BS and NO2 depends on many factors besides the outdoor levels, and that information on season or
outdoor temperature and residence exposure, could improve the accuracy of the personal exposure estimation. Regression
coefficients for personal exposure and front door PM2.5 in warm season was 0.67 *, and in the cold season, 0.28. Front door BS in
warm season was 0.86 *, and in the cold season, 0.45.* Front door NO2 in warn season was 0.68 *, and cold season 0.32.*
Sram etal. (2007,188457)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Exposure-Control study 53 policemen (exposed) and 52 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers (control) were enrolled. Ambient
and PE PM10, PM2.5, and c-PAHs were monitored and chromosomal aberrations were analyzed.
Feb 6-20, 2001
Prague, Czech Republic
Policemen working outdoors in Prague
NA
Personal monitoring using personal samplers (name of instrument not stated)
PM10 PM2.5
NR
PM10 PM2.5
c-PAHs, B[a]P
Ambient air exposure to c-PAHs increased fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) cytogenetic parameters in non-smoking policemen
exposed to ambient PM
Srivasta et al (2007,157004)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Exposure assessment of indoor environment
April 5-June 26, 2000
Laboratory in Delhi, India
Building occupants
NR
Re-entrainment of existing dust on floor and other surfaces
No personal exposure assessment was conducted
NR
Suspended PM (SPM)
NR
July 2009
A-282
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Components) metals Ca, Mg. Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni
Primary Findings Gravimetric analysis and atomic absorption spectrometry results indicated that the suspended PM (SPM) and metal (lead)
concentrations were higher than the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Delhi, India and SPM standards for residential and
sensitive areas. The maximum concentrations of SPM were observed to be due to penetration of outdoor particles originating from
wind-blown crustal dust and vehicular pollution. Scanning electron microscopy analysis of particles showed dominance of crystalline
silicon and spherical soot particles in samples.
Stein et al. (2002,157008)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Primary Finding(s)
Exposure assessment, evaluation of an aerodynamic particle sizerto accurately measure size-distributed particle mass from
number concentrations
NR
laboratory
PM monitoring devices
NR
No personal exposure assessment was conducted
NR
1.0-13 pm
NR
NR
Significant errors were observed in APS size-distribution measurements with measured mass median diameters (MMAD) as much
as 17 times higher than from cascade impactors. Analysis of APS-correlated time of flight and light scattering data indicated that th
Strand etal. (2007,157018)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Cohort
Winter of 1999-2000; winter of 2000-2001
Denver, Colorado, USA
Asthmatic Children
No
Modeling/Extrapolation from fixed-site ambient monitoring (multiple methods)
No
NR
PM2.5
NR
Using modeled or extrapolated personal ambient PM exposure results in a deattenuation of decrements in FEV1 associated with PM
exposure, relative to use of fixed-site ambient monitoring PM levels. Associations between FEV1 decrements and the various
estimation procedures (modeling and extrapolation) were similar to each other.
Tang at al. (2007,091269)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Cohort Study
12/2003-2/2005
Sin-Chung City, Taiwan
Asthmatic children
6-12 yr
No
Portable particle monitor; DUSTcheck Portable Dust Monitor, model 1.108, GRIMM Labortechnik Ltd., Germany
PM10, PM2.5, PM1, PM2.5-IO, PM1-2.5
NR
PM10, PM2.5, PM2.5-10
NR
Results of linear mixed-effect model analysis suggested that personal PM data was more suitable for the assessment of change in
children's PEFR than ambient monitoring data.
Tatum etal. (2002,157046)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Methodological in this study, the performance of the gravimetric version of the RespiCon was examined in various forest products
industry facilities. The precision of the RespiCon was assessed and its performance was compared with that of both a respirable
cyclone and an inhalable dust sampler. In addition, some RespiCon samples were examined using scanning electron microscopy to
determine physical particle size distribution.
NA
Various forest products industry facilities
occupational
NA
No
NR
July 2009
A-283
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
NR
Respirable (< PM4 pm), Thoracic (< PM10 um), and Inhalable fractions (all PM) of airborne PM.
NR
NR
The RespiCon is a useful sampling device for those situations in which it is important to simultaneously collect either personal or
area samples of the respirable, thoracic, and inhalable fractions of airborne PM.
Thomaidis et al. (2003,044193)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Exposure assessment (chemical characterization of PM2.5 aerosols, source apportionment)
March 1995-March 1995
Two sites in Athens, Greece 1) Patisson in Athens city center and mainly affected by local traffic; 2) Rentis located in a semi-urban
industrial area 5 km outside city center and mainly influenced by small industries
Urban Populations
NR
NR
No personal exposure sampling.
NR
NR
PM2.5
Pb, Cd, Ni, As
Pb exhibited higher values during the winter, possibly due to increased diesel oil combustion from central heating and motor
vehicles. No seasonal variation was observed for other metals. Annual mean levels of Pb at both sites were below the European
Union guidelines.
Thornburg et al. (2004,157052)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
PM exposure studies RTP PM Panel Study; Tampa Asthmatic Children's Study
RTP summer 2000-spring 2001; Tampa October-November 2002
Research Triangle Park (RTP), NC and; Tampa, FL
Residential home occupants
NR
Yes. Resuspension of PM10 from a carpet was identified as a major source in one home (a trailer), while cooking was identified as a
source in many homes.
20 Lpm Harvard impactors and 2 Lpm Personal Exposure Monitors both with 37 mmTeflo filters and gravimetric analysis.; Also, MIE
pdrl 000 nepholometer.
PM2.5, PM10
NR
PM2.5, PM10
NR
The association of duty cycle with indoor-outdoor (I/O) ratio was confounded by the short time span of ventilation system operation
and the presence of strong indoor sources.
Toivola et al. (2002,026571)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Random sample of teachers
Nov 1998-Mar 1999 and Nov-Dec 1999
2 cities in eastern Finland
Elementary school teachers
Button inhalable aerosol sampler
Particle Mass; BS
Particle Mass; BS
NR
Total fungi, total bacteria, viable fungi, viable bacteria
Personal BS exposure correlated with both home and work BS exposures. BS concentrations explained best the variation of particle
mass in personal and home concentrations.
Tovalin etal. (2006,091322)
Study Design Biomarker (DNA damage in blood) exposure assessment
Period Mexico City and Puebla, Mexico
Location Occupational^ exposed outdoor workers
Population 18-60 years old
Age Groups NA
Personal Method Personal integrated filter gravimetric measurement. Questionnaire
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
PM2.5
NR
July 2009
A-284
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Ambient Size NR
Components) NR
Primary Findings 1) In Mexico City, outdoor workers had greater DNA damage than indoor (median tail length 46.8 vs. 30.1 pm); 2) In Mexico City,
outdoor workers had a greater proportion of cells with high DNA damage (tail length = 41 pm); 3) In Puebla, outdoor and indoor
workers had similar damage; 4) DNA damage was correlated with PM2.5 and ozone exposure; 5) High DNA damage in workers was
associated with ozone, PM2.5, and 1 -ethyl-2-methyi benzene (VOC) exposure.
Tovalin-Ahumada et
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
al. (2007,190165)
Point study
April and May, 2002
Mexico City (Ne and SE) and Puebla, Mexico
Indoor and outdoor workers in large urban areas
18 years of age and older
NR, The exposures described in this report were monitored as part of a larger study directed at evaluating the association between
personal exposures to PM2.5 and VOCs and genetic damage in outdoor and indoor workers reported elsewhere (Tovalin et al.,
2006).
Personal exposures to PM2.5 were monitored using 37mm Teflon filters (Model 225-9006, SKC Inc.), fitted to a single stage personal
impactor (Model PEM-761-203A, SKC) and personal sampling pumps (Model PCXR4, SKC). Two PM2.5 personal air samples
(occupational and nonoccupational) were obtained during a 24-h period for each worker in Mexico City and for the indoor workers in
Puebla. Only one PM2.5 personal sample could be obtained during a 24-h period (an overall exposure) for the bus drivers in Puebla
because of their work shift (from 4AM to 8 PM) with rotating start and end times. At the beginning of the work shift, each participant
was asked to carry a backpack holding the pump; the impactor was attached to the backpack strap, in the breathing zone. At the
end of the work shift, the impactor and pump were removed, and replaced with a new sampling setup that was worn by the worker
until the beginning of the next day work shift.
PM2.5
NR
NR
Si; S; K; Ca; Cl(e); Ti; V; Cr; Mn; Fe; Co; Ni; Cu; Zn; Mo(e); Cd(e); Se; Br; Rb; Sr(e); As; Pb
The results of this study suggest that outdoor workers in both Mexican cities experienced higher exposures to PM2.5 than indoor
workers, and that these exposures are well above either the 35 pg/m3 US-EPA or the 65 pg/m3 24-h Mexican standards for PM2.5.
Both subgroups experienced higher occupational than non-occupational exposures. Mexico City outdoor workers had higher
exposures to Soil, Fuels and Industrial emission-related elements than Puebla outdoor workers did. However, Mexico City outdoor
workers had half the exposure to soil dust-related elements and fuel related elements than Puebla outdoor workers. However the S
exposure was similar in all groups but high, product of the high vehicles density in the areas, responsible for 60% of the emission in
Mexico City (Secretaria del Medio Ambiente, 2005). This study of Mexico City results correlates well with a previous PM2.5
emissions inventory results, which determined that 81.14% of particles are released from mobile sources
Trenga et al. (2006,
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
155209)
Panel study with repeated measures
3 sampling periods Oct 1999-Aug 2000, Oct 2000-May 2001, Oct 2001 -Feb 2002
Seattle, Washington
Adults with and without COPD and children with asthma
adults ages 56-89 and children ages 6-13
NR
Carrying personal monitor (Harvard Personal Environmental Monitor for PM2.5)
PM2.5
PM2.5
Coarse (PM10-PM2.5) and PM2.5 for residential outdoor, PM2.5 for central site
NR
FEV1 decrements associated with 1 -day lagged central site PM2.5 in adult subjects with COPD. Associations between PM and lung
function decrements were significant only in asthmatic children not receiving anti-inflammatory medication. Same day central s
Turpin et al. (2007,157062)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
RIOPA Study 24-h integrated indoor, outdoor, and personal samples collected in 3 cites.
Summer 1991-spring 2001
Elizabeth, NJ, Houston, TX, and Los Angeles County, CA
309 adults and 118 children (89-18)
NR
PEM on the front strap of a harness near the breathing zone. The bag on the hip contained the pump, battery pack, and motion
sensor
PM2.5
PM2.5, in the main living area (not kitchen)
PM2.5, in the front or back yard
18 volatile organics, 17 carbonyl, PM2.5 mass and >23 PM2.5 species, organic carbon, elemental carbon, and PAHs
July 2009
A-285
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Primary Findings The best estimate of the mean contribution of outdoor to indoor PM2.5 was 73% and the outdoor contribution to personal was 26%.
Urch etal. (2004,055629)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
The study was a crossover design in which each participant received a 2-h exposure to filtered air (FA) and CAP+O3, assigned
randomly and on separate occasions. Study objective is to examine the relationship between total and constituent PM2.5 mass
concentrations and acute vascular response.
2000-2001; not explicitly stated
Downtown Toronto, Canada
24 young (35 ±10 yr) healthy, nonasthmatic, nonsmoking people
35 ± 10years
NR
During exposures a sample was collected immediately upstream to the participant on a 47 mm Gelman Teflon filter with a 2 pm pore
size at an airflow of 15 L/min.
PM2.5
NR
PM2.5
Total carbon (elemental carbon, organic carbon), N03-, SO42-. NIV, K+, CI-, Ca, Fe, Al, Mg, Zn, Mn, Pb, Cu, Ba, Se, Cr, Ni, V, Ar,
Cd all have median, min, and max reported for ambient levels. N03-, SO42-. NIV all have median, min, and max reported for
directly measured personal exposure levels. Total carbon (elemental carbon, organic carbon), Ca, K+, Fe, CI-, Al, Mg, Zn, Pb, Mn,
Cu, Ba, Se, Cr, Ni, V, Ar, Cd all have median, min, and max reported for estimated personal exposure
A significant negative association between both the organic and elemental carbon concentrations and the difference in the post-
exposure change in the BAD between CAP+O3 and FA exposure days.
Vallejo etal. (2006,157081)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
4/2002-8/2002
Mexico City, Mexico
Health young, non-smoking adults
Mean age 27 yr
No
pDR nephelometric method (personal DataRam, pDR1200)
PM2.5
NR
NR
NR
Mean personal PM2.5 level was 74 mg/m3
Vallejo etal. (2006,157081)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Pilot Study
April-August 2002
Mexico City, Mexico
Healthy residents of Mexico City
21-40 yr
NR
The participant carried a personal PM2.5 monitor (DataRAM 1200) during a single 13-h period starting at 9:00 a.m. Indoor situations
included activities at home, at work, at school, or in public places such as theaters, stores, restaurants coffee shops, and subway
transportation. Outdoor activities included walking, standing, or sitting in an open space, driving a car or using public transportation
(bus or taxi).
NR
PM2.5
PM2.5
NR
The descriptive analysis showed that overall outdoor median concentration of PM2.5 was higher than the indoor one. In the indoor
microenvironment, the highest concentrations occurred in the subway followed by the school, and the lowest was at home. The
outdoor microenvironment with the highest concentrations was the public transportation (bus), while the automobile had the lowest.
It was found that PM2.5 concentration levels had a circadian-like behavior probably related to an increase in the population daily
activities during the morning hours, which decrease in the evening, especially at indoor microenvironments. The Center city area
was found to have the highest concentrations of PM2.5.; Multivariate analysis corroborated that PM2.5 concentrations are mainly
determined by geographical locations and hour of the day, but not by the type of microenvironment.
van Roosbroeck et al. (2006, 090773)
Study Design Personal exposure assessment, effect of traffic-related pollutants
Period March-June 2003
Location Amsterdam, The Netherlands
July 2009
A-286
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Mlcroenvlronment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Schoolchildren
9-12 yr
Environmental tobacco smoke, cooking
Integrated filter gravimetric measurement. Light absorbance.
PM2.5 absorbance = "soot"" EC (see Notes)
NR
PM2.5 absorbance = "soot"" EC (see Notes)
NR
Children living near busy roads had 35% higher personal exposure to 'soot' than children living in urban background locations.
van Roosbroeck etal. (2006, 090773)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Mlcroenvlronment Size
Ambient Size
Copollutant(s)
Primary Findings
Exposure assessment
9 months (no year provided)
Utrecht, The Netherlands
School children
10-12 yr
NR
PM2.5 GK2.05 cyclones 4 L/min in a custom made backpack; NO2 and NOX Ogawa passive samplers
PM2.5
NR
PM2.5
NO2
Increased personal exposure to the traffic-related air pollutants soot and NOX was seen in children at the Freeway school. No
increased personal exposure in any of the studied air pollutants was found for children at Ring School.
van Roosbroeck etal. (2006, 090773)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Mlcroenvlronment Size
Ambient Size
Copollutant(s)
Primary Findings
Exposure assessment
9 months (no year provided)
Utrecht, The Netherlands
School children
10-12 yr
NR
PM2.5 GK2.05 cyclones 4 L/min in a custom made backpack; NO2 and NOX Ogawa passive samplers
PM2.5
NR
PM2.5
NOX
Increased personal exposure to the traffic-related air pollutants soot and NOX was seen in children at the Freeway school. No
increased personal exposure in any of the studied air pollutants was found for children at Ring School.
Verma et al. (2003,157093)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Mlcroenvlronment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Task-based exposure assessment of current occupational exposures to chemical agents of Ontario construction workers
June 2000
Ontario, Canada
Ontario construction workers
NR
known source construction activities
Air samples personal sampling pumps and collection media. Direct-reading particulate monitor DustTrak
respirable, inhalable, total, and silica dust; man-made mineral fibers (MMMF)
NR
NR
NR
Authors state "Ontario construction workers are exposed to potentially hazardous levels of chemical agents."
Vinzents et al. (2005, 087482)
Study Design Panel Study
Period 3/2003-6/2003
Location Copenhagen, Denmark
Population Healthy young adults
Age Groups Mean age = 25 yr
Indoor Source No
Personal Method
July 2009
A-287
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Personal Size Ultra-fine particles (UFP) condensation particle counters; (TSI 3007; TSI, St. Paul,
Microenvironment Size UFP (10-100 nm)
Ambient Size PM10
Primary Findings NR
, USA)
Wallace (2005,157102)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Exposure Assessment (Indoor, outdoor air monitoring for concentration of ultrafine particles. To determine indoor source of ultrafine
particles-determine the contribution of vented gas clothes dryer)
Not specifically stated. An 18 month period including 2000.
NR
NR
NR
Vented gas clothes dryer
Scanning mobility particle sizer, differential mobility analyzer, condensation particle counter
NR
Ultrafine (PM 0.01-0.45)
Ultrafine (PM 0.01-0.45)
NR
Vented gas clothes dryer was determined to be a major source of indoor ultrafine particles. It consistently produced an order of
magnitude increase in ultrafine particle concentration compared to times when there was no indoor source.
Wallace and Williams (2005,057485)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Cohort
2000-2001
Raleigh, North Carolina
African-American persons with elevated risk from exposure to particles.
NR
NR
PEM PM2.5 monitor
PM2.5
Indoors PM2.5
Outdoors near residence PM2.5 PM2.5
Sulfur
Using outdoor particles to determine the effect on health is not accurate. The infiltration factor is a good estimator for personal
exposure. Indoor and outdoor measurements of sulfur could be used in the absence of personal exposure measurement to
estimate the contribution of outdoor fine particles to personal exposures.
Wallace etal. (2006,088211)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Time series continuous monitoring of subjects with controlled hypertension or implanted defibrillators were monitored for 7
consecutive days in 4 seasons.
2000-2001
North Carolina, probably near Research Triangle Park
Health-compromised adults, non-smokers
Adults [range not specified]
Cooking, cleaning, personal care, smoking
PEM
PM2.5
PM2.5; Indoor and outdoor
NR
NR
Use of continuous particle measuring instruments allowed more precise identification of sources, frequency and magnitude of short-
term peaks, and more accurate calculation of individual personal clouds.
Wallace etal. (2003,053553)
Study Design Inner City Air Pollution (ICAP) study- Randomized controlled trial
Period NR
Location Bronx, NY; Manhattan, NY; Boston, MA; Chicago, IL; Dallas, TX; Seattle, WA; Tucson, AZ
Population Asthmatic children and their residences
Age Groups 5-11 yr
Indoor Source Combustion-related particles smoking, cooking, use of a wood stove or fireplace, use of candles or incense, gas or kerosene space
heaters or stoves.
Personal Method NR
July 2009
A-288
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
NR
0.10 pg-5 pg; (see note below)
PM2.5
NR
Geometric mean values of indoor concentrations in the seven locations differed by less than a factor of 2, and the shape of the
distributions was very similar across cities, both for the nominal 2-week averages and for hourly averages. The hourly averages
exceeded 100 pg/m3 for at least 2% of all measurements in all cities, and exceeded 1,000 pg/m3 on at least a few occasions in each
city. The most important particle source in these homes was smoking. A second, less powerful source was cooking, particularly
frying/ sauteing or reporting a smoky cooking event. Use of incense also led to significant increases in particle concentrations.
Dusting frequently also led to higher concentrations, possibly considerably higher than indicated by the pDR because of its lack of
sensitivity for coarse particles. Infiltration of outdoor air added about half of the outdoor air concentration to the concentrations
produced by the indoor sources, a result similar to that found by previous studies. Most of the observed variance in indoor
concentrations was day to day, with roughly similar contributions to the variance from visit to visit and home to home within a city
and only a small contribution made by variance among cities. The small variation among cities and the similarity across cities of the
observed indoor air particle distributions suggest that sources of indoor concentrations do not vary considerably from one city to the
next, and thus that simple models can predict indoor air concentrations in cities having only outdoor measurements. A new finding
from this study was the observation that concentrations of fine particles peak in the late evening in homes with smoking, perhaps
reflecting the influence of after dinner smoking.
Wang et al. (2006,157108)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Exposure assessment, identification of sources of outdoor and indoor PM and trace elements
Aug 4-Sep 10, 2004
Guangzhou, China
4 hospitals
NR
NR
No personal exposure assessment was conducted.
NR
PM10, PM2.5
PM10, PM2.5
Trace elements Na, Al, Ca, Fe, Mg, Mn, Ti, K, V, Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd, Sn, Pb, As, Se
High correlation between PM2.5 and PM10 suggest that they came from similar emission sources. Outdoor infiltration could lead to
direct transportation of PM indoors. Human activities and ventilation types could also influence indoor PM. levels.
Ward et al. (2007,157112)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Indoor air sampling to determine size fractionated concentrations of PM, OC, EC, and total carbon
Jan-Mar 2005
Libby, Montana
Children exposed to wood-burning stoves in elementary and middle schools
Burning wood in stoves for heating
NR
NR
PM >2.5,1.0-2.5, 0.5-1.0, 0.25-0.5, and < 0.25 pm
PM >2.5,1.0-2.5, 0.5-1.0, 0.25-0.5, and < 0.25 pm
Organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) in 5 size fractions >2.5,1.0-2.5, 0.5-1.0, 0.25-0.5, and < 0.25 pm
Total measured PM mass concentrations were much higher inside the elementary schools, with particle size fraction (>2.5, 0.5-1.0,
0.25-0.5, and < 0.25 mm) concentrations between 2 and 5 times higher when compared to the middle school. The 1.0-2.5 mm
fraction had the largest difference between the two sites, with elementary school concentrations nearly 10 times higher than the;
middle school values. Weichenthal et al. (2006)
Cross-sectional survey comparing heating systems
Dec2005-Mar 2006
Montreal, Quebec, Pembroke, Ontario, Canada
NR
Yes, by questionnaire on age/size of home, cleaning frequency, type of stove and other cooking appliances, use of kitchen exhaust
fan, number of smokers, burning candles, use of candles, portable heaters, natural gas clothes dryer.
NR
NR
Ultrafine Particles < 100 nm in diameter, PM4
NR
Ultrafine Particles < 100 nm in diameter
Weiseletal. (2005,157131)
Study Design Matched indoor, outdoor, and personal concentrations in proximity to pollution sources.
Period May 1999-Feb 2001
July 2009
A-289
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Elizabeth, NJ, Houston, TX, and Los Angeles County, CA
urban children and adults
Child 6-19 yr; adult 17-89 yr
Age of house, recent renovations (< 1 yr), type of home (single, multiple family), attached garage, carpet indoors, local pollution
sources.
PEM on a harness with inlet near breathing zone.
PM2.5
PM2.5
PM2.5
NR
Personal PM2.5 was significantly higher than indoor and outdoor by one-way ANOVA and Sheffe test (p < 0.001).
Wichmann et al. (2005, 086240)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Exposure assessment; Ambient (indoor); Personal
November 29,1993-March 30,1994; October 17,1994-December 22,1994
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Adults and schoolchildren living near high-traffic or low-traffic roads.
Adults (50-70 yr); Schoolchildren (10-12 yr)
No
Personal impactor
Absorbance coefficient measurements of PM10 filter samples
Absorbance coefficient measurements of PM10 filter samples
Absorbance coefficient measurements
NR
Found tentative support for using type of road as a proxy for indoor and personal exposure to traffic-related absorbance (PM).
Williams etal. (2003,053338)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Cohort study, longitudinal
Summer 2000, fall 2000, winter 2001, and spring 2001
SE Raleigh, North Carolina; Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Elderly persons
50 yr
NR. While no smokers were enrolled into the study, 18 participants occasionally recorded passive exposures to environmental
tobacco smoke. Since this study attempted to determine the effects of ambient PM upon personal and residential settings, and ETS
exposures typically overwhelm ambient contributions, gravimetric values believed to have been heavily influenced by ETS were
excluded from the analysis.
A number of filter-based PM monitors widely used in other PM studies were employed here as described below in Table 1. A nylon
vest, matched to the body size of the participant, was used to support and retain all of the personal monitoring equipment. All of the
personal monitoring equipment was located in the participants breathing zone (chest area) with the exception of the nephelometer
which was secured to the front pocket of the vest with the inlet fully exposed. Each participant was asked to wear the vest at all
times with the exception of sleeping, bathing or the changing of clothes. In those instances, they were asked to secure the vest on
nearby furniture or fixture. A local State of North Carolina AIRS monitoring platform in Raleigh, NC was selected to serve as the
ambient monitoring site.
PM2.5
PM2.5; PM10; PM10-2.5
PM2.5; PM10; PM10-2.5
NR
No statistical difference in personal PM2.5 concentration exposures existed between the two cohorts. Neither seasonality nor
community settings were determined to be critical factors in aggregate personal PM2.5 exposures in the two subpopulations. PM2.5,
and to a lesser extent PM10, mass concentrations were determined to be generally homogeneous across a large spatial area. The
lack of a seasonal effect observed in the RTP was unexpected due to the historically higher PM2.5 levels observed in central North
Carolina during the spring and summertime when automotive traffic is highest and regional power plant demands for electricity are
greatest (and subsequent release of emissions). PM2.5 personal cloud estimates in the current study were in agreement with those
observed in other PM studies involving susceptible subpopulations having more sedentary lifestyles. Mean personal PM2.5
exposures in the current study had a moderate Pearson correlation relative to ambient or residential outdoor mass concentrations i
Wilson and Zawar-Resa (2006,088292)
Study Design Exposure assessment using Advanced Dispersion Modeling to estimate long-term personal PM exposures in small areas within £
city
Period July 2003 and June 2004-2 winter months
Location Christchurch, New Zealand
Population urban environments
Age Groups NR
Indoor Source NR
July 2009
A-290
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
No personal exposure assessment was conducted
NR
NR
PM,o
NR
Despite the area's high intraurban PM concentration variability and meteorological and topographical complexity, the model
performed satisfactorily overall, except for the Mount Pleasant site. The mean of observed measurements across all sites was close
Wilson and Brauer (2006,088933)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Exposure assessment; Ambient (outdoor); Ambient (indoor infiltrating from outdoors); Non-ambient (indoor from indoor sources and
"personal cloud')
April-September 1998
Vancouver, Canada
Subjects with physician-diagnosed COPD
54-86-years-old
No
Personal integrated filter gravimetric measurement; TEOM outdoor ambient
PM2.5
NR
NR
NR
1) Measured ambient PM2.5 exposure comprised 71 % ambient PM2.5 exposure was 71 % of measured ambient concentration and
44% of measured total personal exposure; 2) Non-ambient exposure was independent of ambient exposure; 3) Pearson
correlations of longitudinal estimated ambient exposure with ambient concentration averaged 0.88 (0.77-0.92).
Wu etal. (2006,157156)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Panel study/exposure assessment
9/3/2002-11/1/2002 (The fall agricultural burning season
Pullman, WA
Asthmatic adults
(mean age = 27y/o, min = 18, max = 52 y/o)
No
Yes, using two co-located Harvard; Personal Environmental Monitors (HPEM2.5; Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA),
each connected to its own pump (BGI; AFC 400S, Waltham, MA) operated at 4 L/min
PM2.5
PM2.5
PM2.5
Levoglucosan (LG); Elemental Carbon (EC); Organic Carbon (OC)
Wu etal. (2005,086397)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Panel study with repeated measures
1999-2000
Alpine, CA
Asthmatic children
9-17 yr
No
pDR, continuously and 1 -min concentrations (passive), in a fanny pack.
PM2.5
PM2.5, Home inside & home outside
PM2.5
NR
Personal exposure was higher than those at fixed sites. Subjects received only 45.0% of their exposure indoors at, even though they
spent more than 60% of their time there. In contrast, 29.2% of their exposure was received at school where they spent only 16.4%
of their time. Thus, exposures in microenvironments with high PM levels where less time is spent can make significant contributions
to the total exposure.
Wu etal. (2005,157155)
Study Design
Location
Population
Age Groups
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Modeling of individual exposure using ambient data from a 10-yr longitudinal study.
Southern California Lancaster, San Dimas, Upland, Mira Loma, Riverside, Long Beach and Lake Elsinore.
Children
NR
No measurements presented in this study
NR
July 2009
A-291
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Yeh and Small (2002,040077)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Comparative assessment of AME and IES models
1997 (364 days) spring March-May, summer June-August, Fall September-November, winter December-February
Los Angeles County, CA
General population; ETS and Non ETS Homes
NR
Indoor Cooking, ETS, Other sources and unexplained particulates that maybe generated with engaging in various activities
NR
PM10 PM2.5
NR
PM10 PM2.5
NR
Adjusting from outdoor concentrations to personal exposures and correcting dose-response bias are nearly equal. Roughly the
same premature mortalities associated with short-term exposure to both ambient PM2.5 and PM10 are predicted by both models
Yeh and Small (2002,040077)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
December-February
Comparative assessment of AME and IES models
1997 (364 days) spring March-May, summer June-August, Fall September-November, winter
Los Angeles County, CA
general Population; ETS and Non ETS Homes
NR
Indoor Cooking, ETS, Other sources and unexplained particulates that maybe generated with engaging in various activities
NR
PM10 PM2.5
NR
PM10 PM2.5
NR
Adjusting from outdoor concentrations to personal exposures and correcting dose-response bias are nearly equal. Roughly the
same premature mortalities associated with short-term exposure to both ambient PM2.5 and PM10 are predicted by both models
Yeh and Small (2002,040077)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Comparative assessment of AME and IES models
1997 (364 days) spring March-May, summer June-August, Fall September-November, winter December-February
Los Angeles County, CA
General population; ETS and Non ETS Homes
NR
Indoor Cooking, ETS, Other sources and unexplained particulates that maybe generated with engaging in various activities
NR
PM10
NR
PM10
NR
Adjusting from outdoor concentrations to personal exposures and correcting dose-response bias are nearly equal. Roughly the
same premature mortalities associated with short-term exposure to both ambient PM2.5 and PM10 are predicted by both models
Yip etal. (2004,157166)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Periods. Children were stratified into
A panel study with repeated measures with personal & home monitoring for 8 2-week
smoking and non-smoking households.
2000-2001
Detroit, Michigan
School-age children with asthma
7-11 yr
PEM in a backpack
PM10
PM10; indoor at home & indoor at school
PM10
NR
Personal PM concentrations were significantly correlated with home environment (r = 0.38 to 0.70), with the strongest relationships
in home with non-smokers.
Zhang etal. (2005,157185)
Study Design Several co-located instruments were used to simultaneously sample air at the Pittsburgh EPA Supersite for 15 days
July 2009
A-292
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
7-22 Sep 2002
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
urban Population
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Nonrefractory-PM1
Sulfate, Ammonium, Nitrate, Organics, Chloride
Reasonably good agreement was observed on particle concentrations, composition, and size distributions between the AMS data
and measurements from co-located instruments (given the difference between the PMiand PM2.5 size cuts), including TEOM,
semicontinuous sulfate, 2-h- and 24-h-averaged organic carbon, SMPS, 4-h-averaged ammonium, and micro-orifice uniform
deposit impactor.
Zhao etal. (2006,156181)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Aerosol source apportionment under four environments (personal, residential indoor, residential outdoor and ambient) to evaluate
the relationship between different environments through exposure analysis, and to demonstrate the utility of the combined receptor
model on air quality studies of various environments.
June 2000 to May 2001
Raleigh and Chapel Hill, NC
NR. People with respiratory ailments most likely.
NR
Yes (4 main sources to residential indoor PM Cu-factor mixed with indoor soil, secondary sulfate, Personal care and activity, ETS
and its mixture)
Personal Exposure Monitors (PEM) and Harvard Impactor monitors (HI)
NR
NR
NR
OC, EC, and elements
As per the authors "Secondary sulfate was the largest source for both residential outdoor and ambient PM. Cooking and personal
care activity were two major internal sources for personal and residential indoor PM samples. In this study, secondary sulfate and
motor-vehicle emission contributed significantly to the personal and residential indoor PM.
Zhao etal. (2007,156182)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Components)
Primary Findings
Comprehensive analysis of the sources of PM15 exposure on children with moderate to severe asthma in urban-poor settings.
Two winter periods (October 2002-March 2003 and October 2003-March 2004)
Elementary school for children with significant asthma, Denver, CO
Schoolchildren in urban-poor settings suffering from moderate to severe asthma
6-13 yr (60% in the range 10-13 yr, rest in the range 6-9 yr)
Yes, House cleaning compounds, and smoking were identified as primary internal sources.
Personal Exposure Monitor (PEM)
PM2.5
PM2.5
PM2.5
EC, CI, Si, N03
Four external sources and three internal sources were resolved in this study. Secondary nitrate and motor vehicle were two major
outdoor PM2.5 sources. Cooking was the largest contributor to the personal and indoor samples. Indoor environmental tobacco
smoking also has an important impact on the composition of the personal exposure samples.
Zhuetal. (2005,157191)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Indoor Source
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Components)
Primary Findings
4 apartments near the freeway were monitored at 2 times for 6 consecutive days, 24 h per day. Subjects did not enter the bedrooms
where the samplers were, no cooking, cleaning, children, or pets.
Oct. 2003-Dec. 2003 and Dec. 2003-Jan. 2004
Los Angles, CA
Urban Populations near major freeways.
NR
NR
NR
Indoor and Outdoor ultrafine particles (6-220 nm)
NR
CO
The size distributions of indoor aerosols showed less variability than the adjacent outdoor aerosols. Indoor to outdoor ratios for
ultrafine particle concentrations depended strongly on particle size. I/O ratios were dependent on the indoor ventilation mechanisms
July 2009
A-293
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
applied. Size-dependent particle penetration factors and deposition rates were predicted from data by fitting a dynamic mass
balance model.
Zollner etal. (2007,157192)
Study Design
Period
Location
Population
Age Groups
Personal Method
Personal Size
Microenvironment Size
Ambient Size
Primary Findings
PM exposure was investigated in and outside of schools
Winter Period of 2005 and 2006
Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany
School children
NR
No personal monitoring done. PM2.5 was collected with filter device LVS 6.01 and analyzed gravimetrically; fifteen particle fractions
(0.30 pm to >20 pm) were recorded with laser particle counters; >0.02 pm particles were recorded using condensation particle
counters
NR
They only reported concentrations for PM2.5. PM 0.02 to >20 were collected and analyzed but only PM2.5 concentration were
reported.
They only reported concentrations for PM2.5. PM 0.02 to >20 were collected and analyzed but only PM2.5 concentration were
reported.
1) The impaction of PM was strongly influenced by specific weather conditions; 2) Time resolution of measurements in classrooms
showed variation in particle concentration depending on the type of building and indoor activities; 3) Concentrations of very small
particles indoors and in ambient air measured by condensation particle counter were influenced by traffic emissions.
Table A-53. Examples of studies showing developments with UFP sampling methods since the 2004
PM AQCD.
Reference
PM Size
Ranges
PM
Constituents
Instruments
Primary Findings
Biswas et al.
(2005,150694)
CPC (water)
Water-based CPC performance eval
Feldpausch et al.
(2006,155773)
20-100
nm
Carbonaceous
aerosols
DS with CPC, compared with DMA
The DS with CPC compared fairly well with the DMA for particle sizes up to 40 nm
with 20 - 40% underestimation depending on discharge frequency settings. The
DS sampling period is 3 - 5 s in comparison with the 1 min scanning time of the
DMA.
Hering et al.
(2005,155838)
CPC (water)
Water-based CPC performance eval
Hermann et al.
(2007,155840)
3 - 40 nm
Ag, NaCI
CPC (water and butanol)
Roughly 95% collection efficiency for d >5 nm for TSI models 3776 and 3786,
95% efficiency for d > 20 nm for model 3775, near 90% efficiency for d > 20 nm
for model 3785, near 90% efficiency for d > 25 nm for model 3772.
Kinsey et al. 10nm-5 DE
(2006,130654) pm
TE0M, SMPS, CPC, DustTrak, E- TE0M best comparison with gravimetric filter among mass concentration
BAM, ELPI, integrated filter samples analyzers, ELPI and SMPS comparable for differential number distribution but ELPI
not useful for gravimetric analysis because mass is not significant at small end of
distribution.
Kulmala et al.
(2007,097838)
CPC
Changing temperature difference between saturator and condenser within CPC
allowed for differences in cut-off diameters.
Kulmala et al.
(2007,155911)
2-20nm Atmospheric
aerosol, Ag
Battery of CPCs (water, butanol, n-
butanol)
Used the battery to discriminate between water-soluble, water-insoluble, butanol-
soluble, and butanol-insoluble nucleation-mode particles
Ntziachristos 7 nm - 1 Automobile
and Samaras |jm exhaust
(2006,116722)
5 instruments used simultaneously to
reduce uncertainty: Teflon-coated
filter downstream of constant volume
sampling, ELPI with thermodenuder,
CPC, SMPS, diffusion charger
Use of four reduced variables combining output from all instruments (ratio of
particle number concentration from CPC and ELPI, estimated mean geometric
mobility diameter from signal of diffusion charger and number concentration from
CPC, ratio of signal of diffusion charger to constant volume sampler mass, ratio of
constant volume sampler mass to volume collected by ELPI) resulted in
identification of clear outliers and factors related to driving and fuel properties
rather than measurement errors.
Olfert et al. 30 - 100 NaCI, ambient
(2008,156004) nm
FIMS (compared with SMPS)
Particle number concentrations reported by the FIMS were 8 - 23% higher than
the SMPS using an inversion technique designed to correct for particle residence
time in the FIMS, which operates at 0.1 s resolution.
July 2009
A-294
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
PM Size PM
n p » Instruments
Ranges Constituents
Primary Findings
Petaja et al.
(2006,156021)
CPC (water)
Water-based CPC performance eval
Winkler et al. 1.5-4 Tungsten oxide CPC (n-Propanol) Authors remove excess charge on particles with ion trap to detect particles down
(2008,156160) nm to — 1 nm (by eliminating electrostatic attraction to agglomerate).
Table A-54. Summary of in-vehicle studies of exposure assessment.
Reference
Study Design
Mode of Transport
Exposures
Primary Findings
Rossneret al.
(2008,156927)
Measured PM2.6 exposure of 50
city bus drivers and 50 controls in
Prague, Czech Republic using
personal samplers (type not
specified) and VOCs using passive
samplers. PM2.6 filters analyzed for
c-PAHs. Focus of study is oxidative
stress biomarkers in drivers. Study
period: winter 2005, summer
2006, winter 2006.
Bus
Units: ng/m3
winter 2005:
Bus
c-PAH
7.1
B[a]P
1.3
summer 2006:
Bus
c-PAH
1.8
B[a]P
0.2
winter 2006:
Bus
c-PAH
CJ1
B[a]P
1.0
c-PAH and B[a]P exposure to bus
drivers was significantly higher in
Winter 2006, but control exposure
was significantly higher in Winter
2005 for c-PAH and B[a]P and in
summer 2006 for c-PAH. No
significant difference in V0C
exposure between bus drivers and
controls was observed. Oxidative
stress markers were significantly
higher in bus drivers than controls
for all seasons.
Fruin et al. On-road zero emissions vehicle
(2008, driven on 33-mi arterial road and
097183); 75-mi freeway was equipped
Westerdahl et measured UFP (CPCs, SMPS, EAD),
al. (2005, BC (aethalometer), NOx
086502) [Note: (chemiluminescence), PM-bound
same data PAHs (UV-photoionization), CO (~-
presented.] Trak). DVD analysis of traffic
density and car speed. Study
Period: Feb-Apr 2003 for 2- to 4-h
periods.
Car
Arterial range of medians:
UFP (1000p/cm3) 13-43
PM2.6 (jjg/m3) 7.9-45
BC (jjg/m3) 0.74-3.3
Freeway range of medians:
UFP (1000p/cm3) 47-190
PM2.6 (jjg/m3) 25-110
BC (jjglm3) 2.4-13
Measurements of freeway UFP, BC,
PM-bound PAH, and NO
concentrations were roughly one
order of magnitude higher than
ambient measurements. Multiple
regression analysis suggests these
concentrations were a function of
truck density and total truck count.
(Only PM measurements reported
here).
Briggs et al.
(2008,156294)
UFP (P-Trak) and PM10, PM2.6, and
PM1 (OSIRIS light scatter) were
operated in a car while driving or
walking on one of 48 routes in
London. Trips ranged 1.5-15 min by
car and were repeated up to 5
times to improve statistics. Study
Period: Weekdays in May and June
2005.
Car
Units: PM1 - PM10 (jjg/m3), UFP (p cm-3)
Walking Avg Car Exposure:
PM10 5.87 (3.09)
PM2.6 3.01(1.10)
PM1 1.82(1.10)
UFP 21639(14379)
Avg Walking Exposure:
PM10
PM2.6
PM1
UFP
27.56 (13.16)
6.59(3.12)
3.37 (3.40)
30334 (17245)
ln-car concentrations of PM2.6,
PM1, and UFP correlated well with
walking concentrations
(R - 0.806,0.800, 0.799
respectively). Avg walking
concentrations were 1.4 - 4.7
times higher than avg in-car
concentrations. Cumulative walking
exposures (not shown here) were
4.4 - 15.2 times higher than those
in cars, likely resulting from longer
transit times for walking.
July 2009
A-295
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Study Design
Mode of Transport
Exposures
Primary Findings
Gomez-Pe rales
PM2.E (personal filter pump), CO
Bus
Units: PM2.6 mass (|jg|m3), components
(% of mass)
Buses and minibuses had similar
et al. (2007,
(T15 electrochemical cell), and
Minibus
Bus:
concentration levels for PM2.6
138816)
benzene (canister) were measured
Metro
mass, and metro exposures were
on transit routes, and PM2.6 filters
PM2.6
20-58
lower. CO and benzene
were analyzed for mass, OC/EC,
(NH4O3
5-8
concentrations were higher on
SO42', NO3', and trace metals.
(NH4)2S04
10-18
minibuses than buses. OC was the
Study period: 3-h morning and
OC
17-39
largest PM constituent for all
evening rush hour Jan - March
modes of transport. Measured
2003
EC
8-20
concentrations were higher in the
Crustal
15-18
morning than in the evening rush
Non-crustal
2-3
hour periods. Maximum historical
wind speeds (1995-2003) appeared
Unknown
6-24
to be inversely associated with
measured concentration.
Minibus:
PM2.6
25-55
(NH4O3
4-13
(NH4)2S04
7-22
OC
22-37
EC
9-19
Crustal
12-13
Non-crustal
3-3
Unknown
4-26
Metro:
PM2.6
24-41
(NH4O3
5-8
(NH4)2S04
10-21
OC
35-42
EC
9-13
Crustal
10-16
Non-crustal
2-4
Unknown
5-20
Diapouli et al.
UFP (CPC) concentrations were
"In-vehicle" (not specified)
15-min median (1000p/cm3):
In-vehicle UFP concentrations were
(2007,156397)
measured at school, residential,
School indoor
13.6
roughly 3.5 - 7 times higher than
and in-vehicle environments in
school or residence concentrations.
Athens, Greece. Study Period:
School outdoor
16.6
Indoor concentration diel patterns
school hours, Nov 2003 - Feb
Residence indoor
11.2
were also shown to follow outdoor
2004 and Oct - Dec 2004
Residence outdoor
24.0
levels, which suggests that indoor
In-vehicle
78.0
levels are of outdoor origin.
Gulliver and
TSP, PM10, PM2.6, and PM1
Car
Mean cone (jjg/m3):
Walking exposures larger than car
Briggs (2007,
sampled (OSIRIS light-scatter
Walk
Walk
and background, and car exposures
155814)
devices) in a car while driving or
TSP-PMio
19.1 (19.8)
were generally larger than
walking on one of 48 routes in
background except for PM1. Peak
London. Trips ranged 1.5-15 min by
PM10 2.5
22.1 (22.8)
exposures during walking were
car and were repeated up to 4
PM2.6 1
10.9(10.4)
significantly higher than peak in-car
times to improve statistics. Study
PM1
4.8 (3.4)
exposures.
Period: Jan - Mar 2005.
July 2009
A-296
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Study Design
Mode of Transport
Exposures
Primary Findings
Sabin et al. BC (aethalometer), particle-bound
School bus (diesel, diesel with
In-bus mean concentration, Units: BC (jjg/m3)
, PAH (ng/m3)
Mean concentrations on diesel
(2005, 088300) PAH (UV-photoionization), and NO
particle trap (TO), compressed
Windows closed:
buses without newer emissions
(luminol reaction) were measured
gas (CNG))
BC
control technologies were 2 - 4.4
on 3 diesel school buses, 1 diesel
times higher than background. On
school bus with a particle trap, and
BG
2.5
buses with particle traps,
one compressed gas bus during
CNG
2.3
concentrations were 1.2 - 2.5
before- and after-school commutes.
TO
7.1
times higher than background,
Study Period: May - June 2002.
while concentrations on
diesel
11
compressed gas-fueled school
Windows open:
buses were actually lower than
background.
BC
BG
1.9
CNG
1.5
TO
2.3
diesel
3.9
Gulliver and
PMio, PM2.6, and PM1 sampled
Car
Walk
ln-car PM10 concentrations were
Briggs (2004,
(OSIRIS light-scatter devices) in a
Walk
PM10
38.2
elevated compared with walking
053238)
car while driving or walking on
PM2.6
15.1
and background. PM2.6 and PM1
northern corridor of Northhampton
concentrations were comparable
UK. Study Period: 1-h interval of
PM1
7.1
for walking and background.
morning and evening rush hour
Periods of elevated PM2.6 compared
during Winter 1999 - 2000.
with PM10 generally corresponded
to times when S042~ levels were
also high.
Gomez-Pe rales
PM2.E (personal filter pump), CO
Bus
PM2.6 (jjg/m3):
Generally, PM2.6 concentration was
et al. (2004,
(T15 electrochemical cell), and
Minibus
Bus
68
higher in the morning than evening
054418)
benzene (canister) were measured
Metro
rush hour, but variability was
on transit routes, and PM2.6 filters
Minibus
71
higher for minibuses than other
were analyzed for mass, OC/EC,
Metro
61
modes of transport. Wind speed
SO42, NO3', and trace metals.
was found to be associated with
Study period: 3-h morning and
PM2.E concentration on minibuses.
evening rush hour May - June
2002
July 2009
A-297
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table A-55. Summary of personal PM exposure studies with no indoor source during 2002-2008.
Reference / Location
Personal
Micro
Ambient
SOUTHWEST
Delfino et al. (2006,
090745)
Riverside and Whittier,
California
Method: PEM
Riverside:
n
24-h PM2.6
1-h max PM2.6
8-h max PM2.6
Whittier:
n
24-h PM2.6
1-h max PM2.B
8-h max PM2.6
13
32.78(21.84)
97.94 (70.29)
47.21 (30.0)
32
36.2(21.84)
93.63 (75.19)
51.75(36.88)
Method: FRM
Riverside:
24-h PM2.6
(23.46)
24-h PM10
(29.36)
Whittier:
24-h PM2.6
(12.14)
24-h PM10
(16.6)
36.63
70.82
18.0
35.73
Delfino et al. (2004,
056897)
Alpine, California
Method: pDR
Last 2-h PM2.6
(33.7)
Diurnal PM2.6
(31.6)
Nocturnal PM2.6
(13.6)
1-h max PM2.6
(120.3)
4-h max PM2.6
(55.3)
8-h max PM2.6
(39.0)
24-h PM2.6
(19.9)
34.4
55.7
22.3
151.0
87.5
67.6
37.9
Method: HI
Indoor 24-h PM10
3(11.9)
Indoor 24-h PM2.6
1 (5.4)
Outdoor 24-h PM10
9(10.4)
Outdoor 24-h PM2.6
0 (5.4)
30.
12.
25.
Method: TE0M
Diurnal PM10
5.1 (11.3)
Nocturnal PM10
3.3 (8.4)
1-h max PM10
4.4 (13.8)
4-h max PM10
4.5(12.4)
8-h max PM10
9.8(11.2)
24-h PM10
3.6(9.1)
24-h PM2.B
0.3(5.6)
Wu et al. (2005,157155) Method: pDR
Alpine, CA n
Avg of 24-h PM2.6
11
11.4 (7.8)
Method: pDR
n
Avg of 24-h PM2.6
Method: HI
n
Avg of 24-h PM2.6
14
Method: pDR
n
5.6 (2.9) Avg of 24-h PM2.1,
(11.4)
14
9.8(2.5)
Method: HI
n
Avg of 24-h PM2.6
(7.8)
14.0
14.3
July 2009
A-298
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference / Location
Personal
Micro
Ambient
Turpin et al. (2007,
157062)
Los Angeles County, CA
(and Elizabeth, NJ,
Houston, TX)
Method: PEM
Avg of 48-h PM2.6
Child
Adult
40.2
29.2
Method: HI
Avg of 48-h PM2.6:
16.2
Method: HI
Avg of 48-h PM2.6:
19.2
NORTWEST
Jansen et al. (2005,
082236)
Seattle, Washington, USA
Method: PM
Results
Method: HI
Indoor home:
PM10
PM2.6
Method: HI
PM10
11.93 PM2.6
7.29
18.0
14.0
Outdoor home:
PM10
PM2.6
13.47
10.47
Mar et al. (2005, 087566) Method: HI
Seattle, WA USA PM2.1,:
Method: HI
PM2.6:
PM10:
Healthy:
7 (7.8)
CVD:
2(11.3)
COPD:
1 (6.6)
Method: HI
PM2.6:
Healthy:
9.3 (8.4)
Healthy:
7.4 Healthy:
9.0
CVD:
10.8(8.4)
(4.8)
(4.6)
COPD:
10.5(7.2)
CVD:
9.5 CVD:
(6.8)
12.
COPD:
8.5 ? (7 9)
(5.1)
COPD:
9.2
12.
16.
14.
(5.1)
PM10:
Healthy:
5 (7.0)
CVD:
0 (9.0)
COPD:
3 (6.8)
14.
18.
14.
Wu et al. (2006,157156) During non-burning times: 13.8 (11.1)
Pullman, WA During burning episodes: 19.0 (11.8)
July 2009
A-299
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference / Location
Personal
Micro
Ambient
Trenga et al. (2006,
155209)
Seattle, Washington
Method: PEM
Median PM2.6
Child 11.3
Adult 8.5
Method: HI
Median PM2.6
Child
Adult
Method: HI
Residential Outdoor
7.5 Median PM2.6
7.6 Child
Adult
Residential Outdoor
Median PMcoarse
Child
Adult
Residential Outdoor
Median PM2.6 central site
Child
Adult
9.6
8.6
4.7
5.0
11.2
10.3
Koenig et al. (2003,
156653)
Seattle, WA
13.4 ± 3.2/yg/m3
Inside homes - 11.1 ±4.9
Outside homes — 13.3 ± 1.4
3 Central-sites - 10.1 ± 5.7
Liu S et al. (2003,
073841)
Seattle, WA
Summary of PM concentrations (//g|m3) between October Summary of PM concentrations (//g|m3)
Summary of PM concentrations (//g|m3)
1999 and May 2001 by study group.
Group Mean ± SD Personal PM2.6
COPD 10.5 ± 7.2 Healthy 9.3 ± 8.4 Asthmatic
13.3 ± 8.2 CHD 10.8 ±8.4
between October 1999 and May 2001 by study between October 1999 and May 2001 by study
group.
Group Mean ± SD
Indoor
PM2.6
COPD 8.5 ±5.1
Healthy 7.4 ± 4.8 Asthmatic 9.2 ± 6.0 CHD
9.5 ± 6.8
PM10
COPD 14.1 ± 6.6 Healthy 12.7 ± 7.8
Asthmatic 19.4 ±11.1 CHD 16.2 ± 11.3
group.
Location Pollutant
Group Mean ± SD
Outdoor PM2.6
COPD 9.2 ± 5.1 Healthy 9.0 ± 4.6 Asthmatic
11.3 ± 6.4 CHD 12.7 ± 7.9 PM10
COPD 14.3 ± 6.8 Healthy 14.5 ± 7.0
Asthmatic 16.4 ± 7.4
CHD 18.0 ± 9.0
SOUTH CENTRAL
Turpin et al. (2007,
Houston
Houston: 17.1
Houston: 14.7
157062)
Child: 36.6
Houston (and Elizabeth,
Adult: 37.2
NJ, and Los Angeles
County, CA)
MIDWEST
Sarnat et al. (2006,
Mean (SD): PM2.6
Mean (SD): PM2.6
089784)
Summer
Summer
Steubenville, OH
n - 169
n - 65
mean (SD) - 19.9 (9.4)
mean (SD) - 20.1 (9.3)
Fall
Fall
mean (SD) - 20.1 (11.6)
mean (SD) - 19.3 (12.2)
July 2009 A-300 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference / Location
Personal
Micro
Ambient
Adgate et al. (2002,
Battle Creek
Battle Creek
Battle Creek
030676)
All Seasons: 118, 22.7, (25.71,16.2(2.2)
All Seasons: 108,10.6(6.6), 9.0(1.8)
All Seasons: 88 9.4 (6.21,7.8(1.8)
Battle Creek, East St.
Paul, and Phillips,
Minnesota, constituting
Spring: 41, 26.3 (25.7), 19.4 (2.1)
summer: 31, 28.5 (36.1), 20.3 (2.1)
Spring: 25,12.7 (7.71,11.0(1.7)
summer: 36, 8.9 (3.8), 8.1 (1.5)
Spring: 36,10.5(7.11,8.5(2.0)
summer: 22, 8.7 (4.4), 7.8 (1.6)
the Minneapolis-St. Paul
Fall 46,15.5 (13.4),11.9 (2.1)
Fall: 47,10.9(7.4), 8.8(2.0)
Fall: 30, 8.4(6.21,7.1 (1.7)
metropolitan area.
E. St. Paul
E. St. Paul
E. St. Paul
All Seasons: 107, 30.5(38.71,20.6(2.3)
All Seasons: 97,17.4(20.31,12.2(2.2)
All Seasons: 95,10.8(6.6), 9.3(1.8)
Spring: 44, 33.9 (34.4), 23.9 (2.3)
Spring: 30, 20.7(26.41,13.6(2.4)
Spring: 36,12.0(7.31,10.1 (1.9)
summer: 25, 20.5(15.01,17.2(1.8)
summer: 26,15.8 (11.4), 13.7 (1.6)
summer: 25, 8.5 (3.2), 7.8 (1.6)
Fall: 38,33.1(51.9), 19.5(2.5)
Fall 41 16.019.610.4 2.4
Fall: 34,11.3(7.5), 9.6(1.8)
Phillips
Phillips
Phillips
All Seasons: 107, 26.5 (24.3), 20.9 (2.0)
All Seasons: 89,14.2(13.01,11.3(1.9)
All Seasons: 88,10.0(5.8), 8.7,(1.7)
Spring: 28, 37.5(37.61,30.0(1.8)
Spring: 15,16.9 (14.2), 13.0 (2.1)
Spring: 30 (12.11,7.2(10.5)
summer: 40, 22.7 (15.31,19.2(1.7)
summer: 36,13.2(6.41,11.4(1.7)
summer: 30, 8.6 (3.8), 7.8 (1.6)
Fall: 39,22.7 (16.71,17.6(2.1)
Fall: 38,14.4 (16.7), 10.6(2.0)
Fall: 28, 9.3(5.5), 8.1 (1.7)
Crist et al. (2008,
Athens (rural): 17.61 (17.81)
Indoor
Outdoor
156372)
Koebel (urban): 14.59 (13.05)
Athens (rural): 17.20 (13.56)
Athens (rural): 13.66 (8.91)
Ohio River Valley near
Columbus
New Albany (suburb): 13.93 (12.25)
Koebel (urban): 14.98 (12.30)
New Albany (suburb): 16.52 (13.53)
Koebel (urban): 13.89 (9.29)
New Albany (suburb): 12.72 (8.86)
SOUTHEAST
Wallace and Williams
PM2.6 pers - 23.0 (16.4)
PM2.6 in - 19.4(16.5)
PM2.6 out - 19.5(8.6)18.1 (8.1)
(2005, 057485)
PM2.6 pers/PM2.6 out - 1.31 (0.99)
PM2.6 in/PM2.6 out - 1.08 (1.05)
Raleigh, North Carolina
Williams et al. (2003,
Pooled PM mass concentrations (/L/g|m3) across all
Pooled PM mass concentrations (/L/g|m3) across
Pooled PM mass concentrations (/^g/m3) across
053338)
subjects, residences, seasons, and cohorts
all subjects, residences, seasons, and cohorts
all subjects, residences, seasons, and cohorts
SE Raleigh, North Carolina
Variable N Geo mean Mean RSD(a)
Variable N Geo mean Mean RSD(a)
Variable N Geo mean Mean RSD(a)
Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Personal PM2.6 (b) 712 19.2 23.0 70.1
Indoor PM2.1, (c) 761 15.3 19.1 80.1
Ambient PM2.5 (c) 746 17.3 19.2 44.9
(a) Relative standard deviation of the presented
Outdoor PM2.1, (c) 761 17.5 19.3 43.7
Ambient PMio(b) 752 27.9 31.4 51.5
arithmetic mean.
Indoor PMio(b) 761 23.2 27.7 70.6
Ambient PM102.5(d) 210 8.6 10.0 62.3
(beasured using PEMs.
Outdoor PMio(b) 761 27.5 30.4 46.4
Indoor PM10 2.5(d) 761 6.3 8.6 111.8
Outdoor PM10 2.5(d) 761 8.5 11.1 86.9
(a) Relative standard deviation of the presented
(a) Relative standard deviation of the presented
arithmetic mean.
(beasured using PEMs.
(ceasured using HI samplers.
(deasured by difference in PEM PM10 monitor
arithmetic mean ant' co'ocated HI PM2.6 mass concentrations.
(beasured using PEMs.
(ceasured using HI samplers.
(deasured by difference in PEM PM10 monitor
and co-located HI PM2.6 mass concentrations.
July 2009
A-301
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference / Location
Personal
Micro
Ambient
NORTHEAST
Koutrakis et al. (2005,
PM2.6:
PM2.6:
095800)
(Baltimore, Boston)
(Baltimore, Boston)
Baltimore, MD Boston,
Winter: Seniors: 15.1 (14.6), 14.1 (6.0)
Winter:
MA
Children: 24.0(21.81,18.5(12.8)
COPD: 16.4 (12.7), NR
All: 20.1 (9.41,11.6(6.8)
Summer: Seniors: 22.1 (10.1), 18.8 (9.7)
summer:
Children: 18.6(8.1), 30.3(14.2)
Seniors: 25.2(11.51,12.7(5.4)
COPD: NR, NREC:
Children: 23.2(14.01,17.0(11.5)
(Baltimore, Boston)
COPD: NR, NREC:
Winter: Seniors: NR, 1.4 (0.9)
(Baltimore, Boston)
Children: 2.8(1.81,1.6(1.6)
COPD: 2.0(1.2), NR
Winter:
Summer: Seniors: NR, NR
All: 1.2(0.6)
Children: NR, NR
summer: NR, NRSO4:
COPD: NR, NRSO4:
(Baltimore, Boston)
(Baltimore, Boston)
Winter:
Winter: Seniors: 1.9 (1.1), 1.9 (1.2)
Children: NR, 2.3(1.7)
All: 4.0 (1.7), 3.1 (1.8)
COPD: 1.5(0.8), NR
summer:
Summer: Seniors: 5.7 (3.5), 2.9 (1.9)
Seniors: 10.5 (7.1), 3.1 (1.8)
Children: NR, NR
Children: NR, 6.5 (6.0)
COPD: NR, NR
Turpin et al. (2007,
Elizabeth Elizabeth: 20.1
Elizabeth: 20.4
157062)
Child: 54.0
Elizabeth, NJ, (and
Adult: 44.8
Houston, TX, and Los
Angeles County, CA +
Sarnat et al. (2005,
Winter-Children: NR
Winter:
087531)
PM2.1,: 17.4-25.8
PM2.1,: 6.5-15.5
Boston, Massachusetts.
SO4: 1.6-3.3
SO4:1.7-4.2
Comparisons to a previous
Winter-Seniors:
Summer:
study in Baltimore are
PM2.1,: 10.8-16.2
PM2.6:11.9-21.4
made.
SO4: 1.6-2.6
SO4: 3.6-9.0
Summer-Children
PM2.6: 25.4-32.8
S(k 2.7-3.3
Summer-Seniors
PM2.1,: 17.8-20.5
S(k 2.7-3.3
Table A-56. Summary of PM species exposure studies.
Reference
Particle Sizes Measured
Component
Results
Primary Findings
Gadkari et al. (2007,156459)
Personal: RPM
Micro: NR
Ambient: RPM
Fe, Ca, Mg, Na K, Cd, Hg, Ni,
Cr, Zn, As, Pb, Mn and Li
Source contributions varied
widely among 12 sites.
Indoor: 0-95%
Ambient: 0-26%
Road: 0-94%
Soil: 0-75%
Authors conclude that "(1) indoor
activities and poor ventilation
qualities are responsible for
major portion of high level of
indoor RPM, (2) majority of
personal RPM is greatly
correlated with residential indoor
RPM, (3) time-activity diary of
individuals has much impact on
relationship investigations of
their personal RPM with their
July 2009
A-302
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Particle Sizes Measured
Component
Results
Primary Findings
respective indoor and ambient-
outdoor RPM levels
as reported in earlier reports and
(4) residential indoors, local road-
traffic and soil-borne RPMs are
the dominating routes of
personal exposure compared to
ambient outdoor RPM levels.
Koistinen et al. (2004,156655)
Personal, Micro, and Ambient:
PM2.6
Black smoke, SO42, Nth-, NH4+,
Al, Ca, CI, Cu, K, Mg, P, S, Si, Zn
% contribution to PM2.6
Outdoor ¦ Indoor ¦ Work ¦ Pers
CoPM * 35 28 32 33
Secondary** 46 36 37 31
Soil 16 27 27 27
Detergents 0 6 2 6
Sea Salt 3 2 12
* CoPM is the difference
between total mass and other
identified components; i.e.,
primary combustion particles,
nonvolatile primary and
secondary organic particles, and
particles from tire wear, water,
etc. ** Secondary particles are
the sum of sulfate, nitrate, and
ammonium.4 factors were
identified for each exposure type
(residential indoor, residential
outdoor, workplace indoor, and
personal). The factors contained
the elements Al, Ca, CI, Cu, K,
Mg, P, S, Si, Zn, and black
smoke, (insert in cell to left after
consolidating PM size)
Population exposure assessment
of PM2.E, based on outdoor fixed-
site monitoring, overestimates
exposures to outdoor sources
like traffic and long-range
transport and does not account
for the contribution of significant
indoor sources.
Turpin et al. (2007,157062)
Personal: PM2.6
Micro: PM2.6, in the main living
area (not kitchen)
Ambient: PM2.6, in the front or
back yard
18 volatile organics, 17
carbonyl, PM2.6 mass and > 23
PM2.E species, organic carbon,
elemental carbon, and PAHs
For Los Angeles
Carbon (/^gC/m3)
EC 1.4
OC 4.1
Elements (ng/m3)
Ag 0.5; Al 24.7; As 0.5; Ba
22.9; Br 5.3; Ca 80.9; Cd 0.4; CI
62.0;
Co ND; Cr 0.6; Cu 5.5; Fe 162.9;
Ga 0.1; Ge 0.1; Hg 0.1; In 0.3;
K 74.1; La 2.3; Mn 2.9; Mo 0.4;
Ni 2.0; Pb 4.7; Pd 0.3; P 0.1; Rb
0.1;
S 1022.9; Sb 2.1; Se 1.4; Si
128.9; Sn 7.9; Sr 1.8; Ti 10.4; V
5.3;
Y 0.1; ;Zn 16.4; Zr 0.5
The best estimate of the mean
contribution of outdoor to indoor
PM2.6 was 73% and the outdoor
contribution to personal was
26%.
Delfino et al. (2006, 090745) Personal: 24-h PM2.6 24-h PM2.6 EC
Mean (SD), units: jjg/m3:
PM associations with airway
1-hmaxPM2.B 24-h PM2.6 OC
Riverside
inflammation in asthmatics may
8-h max PM2.6
be missed using ambient particle
Ambient: 24-h PM2.6
24-h PM2.6 EC - 1.61 (0.78)
mass.
24-hPMio
24-h PM2.6 OC - 6.88(1.86)
The strongest positive
(also 24-h NO2, 8-h max O3, 8-h
Whittier
associations were between eNO
max NO2, 24-h NO2, 8-h max CO)
24-h PM2.6 EC - 0.71 (0.43)
and 2-day avg pollutant
concentrations. Per IQR
24-h PM2.6 OC - 3.93(1.49)
increases: 1.1 ppb
FEN0/24/yg/m3 personal PM2.6.
0.7 ppb FEPJ0/0.6 //g/m3
personal EC
1.6 ppb FENO /17 ppb personal
July 2009
A-303
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Particle Sizes Measured
Component
Results
Primary Findings
NO?
Ambient PM2.6 and personal and
ambient EC were significant only
when subjects were taking
inhaled corticosteroids.
Subjects taking both inhaled
steroids and antileukotrienes had
no significant associations.
Distributed lag models showed
personal PM2.6 in the preceding 5
h was associated with FENO.
Salma et al. (2007,113852)
Personal: PMio-2.0 and PM2.0
Micro: NA
Ambient: NR
30 elements (Na, Mg, Al, Si, P,
S, CI, K, Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni,
Cu, Zn, Ga, Ge, As, Se, Br, Rb,
Sr, Y, Zr, Nb, Mo, Ba, and Pb)
Units: ng/m3:
PM10-2 o; PM2 o; Mg 296 130; Al
531 93; Si 2.09 442; S 978
828;
CI 305 104; K 318127; Ca 2.57
413; Ti 47 25; Cr 35 15; Mn
310 148; Fe 33.5 15.5; Ni 29 8;
Cu 496 190; Zn 118 50; Br 13
DL; Ba 145 DL; Pb 47 21; PM
83.6 33.0
The concentrations observed in
the Astoria underground station
were clearly lower (by several
orders of magnitude) than the
corresponding workplace limits.
Lai et al. (2004, 056811)
Personal, Micro, and Ambient:
PM2.6
Ag Cr Mn Si
Al Cu Na Sm
As Fe Ni Sn
Ba Ga P Sr
Br Ge Pb Ti
Ca Hg Rb TI
Cdl STm
CIKSbV
Co Mg Se Zn
Zr
GM (GSD), units: ng/m3
P
RO
Wl I/O
Al
As
Br
Ca
Cd
CI
Cu
Fe
Ga
K
Mg
Mn
Na
Ni
Both the indoor and outdoor
environments have sources that
elevated the indoor
concentrations in a different
extent, in turn led to higher
personal exposures to various
pollutants.
Geometric mean (GM) of
personal and home indoor levels
of PM2.6,14 elements, total VOC
(TVOC) and 8 individual
compounds were over 20%
higher than their GM outdoor
levels. Those of NO2, 5 aromatic
VOCs, and 5 other elements
were close to their GM outdoor
levels. For PM2.6 and TVOC,
personal exposures and
residential indoor levels (in GM)
were about 2 times higher
among the tobacco-smoke
exposed group compared to the
non-smoke exposed group,
suggesting that smoking is an
important determinant ofthese
exposures. Determinants for CO
were visualised by real-time
monitoring, and the authors
showed that the peak levels of
personal exposure to CO were
associated with smoking,
cooking and transportation
activities. Moderate to good
correlations were only found
between the personal exposures
and residential indoor levels for
both PM2.6 (r - 0: 60; p< 0:
001) and NO2 (r - 0: 47; p - 0:
003).
July 2009
A-304
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Particle Sizes Measured
Component
Results
Primary Findings
P
Pb
S
Se
Si
Sn
Ti
V
Zn
Adgate et al. (2007,156196)
Personal, Micro, and Ambient:
PM2.6 ¦ broken down into TE
Ag, Al, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cs, Cu,
Fe, K, La, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Pb, S,
Sb, Sc, Ti, TI, V, Zn
Median, units: ngfm3:
0
I
s
334.4
272.1
351.6; Ca
232.285.0
174.1; Al
96.3
23.3
58.6;
Na
33.1
20.6
31.9;
Fe
12.6
43.1
78.6; Mg
10.9
16.3
27.5;
K
3.2
38.4
47.5; Ti
3.0
0.8
1.4;
Zn
2.7
6.5
9.6; Cu
2.4
1.5
4.9;
Ni
NA
¦0.1
1.8; Pb
1.5
2.4
3.2;
Mn
0.6
1.5
2.3; Sb
0.08
0.21
0.30;
Cd
0.05
0.12
0.14; V
0.05
0.12
0.16;
La
0.02
0.05
0.11; Cs
0.00
0.00
0.00;
Th
0.00
0.00
0.00; Sc
0.00
0.00
0.01;
Ag
0.00
0.07
0.08; Co
NA
0.02
0.07;
Cr
¦0.09
1.2
2.6
The relationships among P, I, and
0 concentrations varied across
TEs. Unadjusted mixed-model
results demonstrated that 0
monitors are more likely to
underestimate than overestimate
exposure to many of the TEs
that are suspected to play a role
in the causation of air pollution
related health effects. These
data also support the conclusion
that TE exposures are more
likely to be underestimated in the
lower income and centrally
located PHI community than in
the comparitively higher income
BC K community. Within the
limits of statistical power for
this sample size, the adjusted
models indicated clear seasonal
and community related effects
that should be incorporated in
long-term exposure estimates for
this population.
Ebelt et al. (2005, 056907)
Personal: PM2.6
Micro: "ambient exposure":
PM2.6, PM10, PM2.6 -10;
"non-ambient exposure": PM2.6
Ambient: PM2.6, PM10, PM2.6 -10
Ambient sulfate,
ambient non-sulfate,
personal sulfate,
personal ambient non-sulfate
Mean (SD), units jjg/m3
Ambient sulfate: 2.0 (1.1),
ambient non-sulfate: 9.3 (3.7),
personal sulfate: 1.5 (0.9),
personal ambient non-sulfate:
6.5 (3.0)
Ambient exposures and (to a
lesser extent) ambient
concentrations were associated
with health outcomes; total and
nonambient particle exposures
were not.
Farmer et al. (2003, 089017)
Personal: PM10
Micro: NR
Ambient: PM10
Extractable organic material
(EOM)
Benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P)
Carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons (cPAHs)
Units: ng/m3:
Exposed, controls:
Prague:
cPAHs - 12.04(11.101,6.17
(3.48)
Personal exposure to B[a]P and
to total carcinogenic PAHs in
Prague was two fold higher in
the exposed group compared to
controls, in Kosice three fold
higher, and in Sofia 2.5 fold
July 2009
A-305
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Particle Sizes Measured
Component
Results
Primary Findings
B[a]P
B[a]P - 1.79(1.671,0.84(0.60) higher.
cPAHs
Kosice:
cPAHs - 21.72(3.12), 6.39
(1.56)
B[a]P - 2.94(1.441,1.07(0.66)
Sofia:
cPAHs - 93.84 (55.0) police,
94.74 (120.34) bus drivers,
41.65 (33.36)
B[a]P - 4.31 (2.6) police, 5.4
(3.18) bus drivers, 1.96 (1.53)
Jansen et al. (2005, 082236)
Personal: PMio BC, as an estimate of elemental
Micro: PMio, PM2.6, fine particles car']on (EC)
(— PM1)
Ambient: PMio, PM2.6
Mean (IQ Range), units: jjg/m3:
BC
Indoor: 1.34 (1.12)
Outdoor 2.01 (1.68)
Personal 1.64 (2.05)
For 7 subjects with asthma, a
10/yg/m3 increase in 24-h avg
outdoor PMio
and PM2.E was associated with a
5.9 [95% CI, 2.9-8.9] and 4.2
ppb (95% CI, 1.3-7.1) increase
in FENO, respectively. A 1 //g|m3
increase in outdoor, indoor, and
personal BC was associated
with increases in FENO of 2.3
ppb (95% CI, 1.1-3.6), 4.0 ppb
(95% CI,2.0-5.9), and 1.2 ppb
(95% CI, 0.2-2.2), respectively.
No significant association was
found between PM or BC
measures and changes in
spirometry, blood pressure, pulse
rate, or Sa02 in these subjects.
Sorensen et al. (2003,157000) Personal: PM2.6
Micro: NR
Ambient: PM2.6
BS (black smoke)
Units: 10'e/m
n Median Q25-Q75
All 177 6.8 (5.0-13.2)
Autumn 42 7.1 (6.5-17.2)
Winter 46 8.2(5.1-13.3)
Spring 46 12.6 (5.4-10.4)
Summer 47 8.1 (3.4-9.0)
Personal PM2.6 exposure was
found to be a predictor of 8-
oxodG in lymphocyte DNA. No
other associations between
exposure markers and
biomarkers could be
distinguished. ETS was not a
predictor of any biomarker in the
present study. The current study
suggests that exposure to PM2.6
at modest levels can induce
oxidative DNA damage and that
the association to oxidative DNA
damage was confined to the
personal exposure, whereas the
ambient background
concentrations showed no
significant association.
For most of the biomarkers and
external exposure markers,
significant differences between
the seasons were found.
Similarly, season was a
significant predictor of SBs and
PAH adducts, with avg outdoor
temperature as an additional
significant predictor.
Molnar et al. (2005,156772) Personal: 2.5
Micro and Ambient: PMio-2.5
and PM2.6
BS (black smoke)
S
CI
K
Ca
Median, unit - ng/m3
Wood burners Ref 1 -sided p-
value
BS 0.97 0.74 0.053
Statistically significant
contributions of wood burning to
personal exposure and indoor
concentrations have been shown
for K, Ca, and Zn. Increases of
July 2009
A-306
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Particle Sizes Measured
Component
Results
Primary Findings
Mn
Fe
Cu
Zn
Br
Rb
Pb
S 880 650 0.500
CI 200 160 0.036
K 240 140 0.024
Ca 76 43 0.033
Mn 4.8 3.5 0.250
Fe 64 49 0.139
Cu 8.9 2.4 0.016
Zn 38 22 0.033
66-80% were found for these
elements, which seem to be good
wood-smoke markers. In
addition, CI, Mn, Cu, Rb, Pb, and
BS were found to be possible
wood-smoke markers, though
not always to a statistically
significant degree for personal
exposure and indoor
concentrations. For some of
these elements subgroups of
wood burners had clearly higher
levels which could not be
explained by the information
available.
Sulphur, one of the more typical
elements mentioned as a wood-
smoke marker, showed no
relation to wood smoke in this
study due to the large variations
in outdoor concentrations from
LDT air pollution. This was also
the case for PM2.6 mass.
Personal exposures and indoor
levels correlated well among the
subjects for all investigated
species, and personal exposures
were generally higher than
indoor levels. The correlations
between the outdoor and
personal or ind
Johannesson et al. (2007,
156614)
Personal, Micro, and Ambient:
PM2.6, PM1
BS- Black Smoke
BS2.5 Mean SD
Personal 0.65 0.47
Exclusively smokers 0.62 0.47
Residential indoor 0.56 0.47
Exclusively smokers 0.52 0.46
Residential outdoor 0.68 0.51
Exclusively smokers 0.71 0.54
Urban background 0.63 0.37
All measurements 0.68 0.40
PM1/BS1
Personal 0.55 0.20
Residential indoor 0.54 0.45
Exclusively smokers 0.49 0.43
Residential outdoor 0.66 0.51
Exclusively smokers 0.68
Personal exposure of PM2.6
correlated well with indoor
levels, and the associations with
residential outdoor and urban
background concentrations were
also acceptable. Statistically
significantly higher personal
exposure compared with
residential outdoor levels of
PM2.6 was found for
nonsmokers. PM1 made up a
considerable proportion (about
70-80%) of PM2.6. For BS,
significantly higher levels were
found outdoors compared with
indoors, and levels were higher
outdoors during the fall than
during spring. There were
relatively low correlations
between particle mass and BS.
The urban background station
provided a good estimate of the
residential outdoor
concentrations of both PM2.6 and
BS2.5 within the city. The air
mass origin affected the outdoor
levels of both PM2.6 and BS2.5;
however, no effect was seen on
personal exposure or indoor
levels.
Sram et al. (2007,192084)
Personal: PM10, PM2.6
Micro: NR
c-PAHs, B[a]P
B[a]P: exposed 1.6 ng/m3,
control 0.8 ng/m3; c-PAHs:
exposed 9.7 nglm3, control 5.8
Ambient air exposure to c-PAHs
increased fluorescent in situ
hybridization (FISH) cytogenetic
July 2009
A-307
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Particle Sizes Measured
Component
Results
Primary Findings
Ambient: PM10, PM2.6
ng/m3
parameters in non smoking
policemen exposed to ambient
PM
Na and Cocker (2005,156790)
Personal: PM2.6
Micro: NR
Ambient: PM2.6
EC (Elemental carbon)
OC (Organic carbon)
Mean (SD), units - jjg/m3
Residential homes: EC 2.0 (NR)
OC 14.8 (NR)
High school (EC):
Weekday samples 1.1 (0.9)
Weekend samples 1.0 (0.5)
High school (OC):
Weekday samples 8.8 (4.7)
Weekend samples 7.4 (2.4)
Indoor PM2.6 was significant
influenced by indoor OC sources.
Indoor EC sources were
predominantly of outdoor origin.
Geyh et al. (2005,186949)
Personal: TD, PMio, PM2.6
Micro: NR
Ambient: TD, PM10, PM2.6
EC
OC
VOC also
Mean (SD), units - jjg/m3:
Summary Statistics by Area
Location October 2001:
Albany and West
EC 5.9 (NA) OC 36 (NA)
Liberty and Greenwich
EC 5.3 (59) OC 30 (56)
Park Place and Greenwich
EC 14.5 (5.4) OC 72(26)
Church and Dey
EC 7.9 (3.3) OC 48 (15)
April 2002:
Liberty and West
EC 4.2 (2.1) OC 26(13)
Barclay and Greenwich
EC 4.0 (2.6) OC 18(14)
Church and Dey
EC 4.5(1.9) OC 27 (15)
Middle of the Pile
EC 6.7 (1.0) OC 40 (25)
During October, the median
personal exposure to TD was
346 /yglm3. The maximum area
concentration 1742 //g|m3, was
found in the middle of the debris.
The maximum TD concentration
found at the perimeter was
392/yg/m3 implying a strong
concentration gradient from the
middle of debris outward. PM2.6
/PM10 ratios ranged from 23% to
100% suggesting significant fire
activity during some of the
sampled shifts. During April, the
median personal exposure to TD
was 144/yg/m3, and the highest
area concentration, 195 /yglm3,
was found at the perimeter.
Although the overall
concentrations on PM at the site
were significantly lower in April,
the relative contributions of fine
particles to the PM10, and EC
and OC to the TD were similar.
During both months, volatile
organic compounds
concentrations were low.
Comparison of recorded EC and
OC values from October 2001
and April 2002 with previous
studies suggests that the
primary source of exposure to EC
for the WTC truck drivers was
emissions from their own
vehicles.
Zhao et al. (2007,156182)
Personal, Micro, and Ambient:
PM2.6
EC, CI, Si, NOs
Units - jjg/m3:
Personal: EC: 1.64 NOs: 0.135,
Si: 0.176, CI: 0.116; Indoor: EC:
1.819 NOs: 0.013, Si: 0.051, CI:
0.024; Outdoor: EC: 1.876 NOs:
0.292, Si: 0.115, CI: 0.013
Four external sources and three
internal sources were resolved in
this study. Secondary nitrate and
motor vehicle were two major
outdoor PM2.E sources. Cooking
was the largest contributor to
the personal and indoor samples.
Indoor environmental tobacco
smoking also has an important
impact on the composition of the
personal exposure samples.
Meng et al. (2005, 081194)
Personal: PM2.6
Micro: NA
Ambient: NR
EC, OC, S, Si
Mean (SD), units - ng/m3:
Indoor: EC: 1165.9 (2081.0) OC:
7725.5(9359.3) S: 902.3
(602.2) Si: 124.0 (79.0)
Use of central-site PM2.6 as an
exposure surrogate
underestimates the bandwidth of
the distribution of exposures to
July 2009
A-308
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Particle Sizes Measured
Component
Results Primary Findings
Outdoor: EC: 1144.1 (968.1) OC: PM of ambient origin.
3777.7 (2520.1) S: 1232.3
(633.2) Si: 141.1 (171.3)
Smith et al. (2006,156990)
Personal: PM2.6
Elemental carbon (EC)
Work Area
Micro: PM2.6
Organic carbon (OC)
Office
Area samplers in the offices,
Dock
freight dock, or shop.
Yard
Ambient: PM2.6
Shop
Samplers were located in the
yard upwind of the terminal.
Non-smokers on-site:
Clerk
Dock worker
Mechanic
Hostler
Non-smokers off-site
Pickup/deliver driver
Long haul driver
Smokers On-Site
Clerk
Dock worker
Mechanic
Hostler
Smokers off-site
Pickup & Delivery drivers
Long haul drivers
Koutrakis et al. (2005, 095800) Personal: PM2.6
Micro: NR
Ambient: PM2.6
Elemental Carbon (EC),
SO42-
Mean (SD) data are provided for
Baltimore and Boston,
units - jjg/m3:
EC:
(Baltimore, Boston)
Winter:
Seniors: NR, 1.4 (0.9)
Children: 2.8 (1.8), 1.6(1.6)
COPD: 2.0(1.2), NR
SO4:
(Baltimore, Boston)
Winter:
Seniors: 1.9 (1.1), 1.9(1.2)
Children: NR, 2.3 (1.7)
COPD: 1.5(0.8), NR
Summer:
Seniors: 5.7 (3.5), 2.9 (1.9)
Ambient PM2.6 and SO4 are
strong predictors of respective
personal exposures. Ambient SO4
is a strong predictor of personal
exposure to PM2.6. Because
PM2.E has substantial indoor
sources and SO4 does not, the
investigators
concluded that personal
exposure to SO4 accurately
reflects exposure to ambient
PM2.E and therefore the ambient
component of personal exposure
to PM2.6 as well.
Chillrud et al. (2004, 054799)
Personal: PM2.6
Micro: PM2.6
Home indoor and home outdoor
Ambient: Urban fixed-site and
upwind fixed site operated for
three consecutive 48-h periods
each week.
Elemental iron, manganese, and
chromium are reported in this
study out of 28 elements
sampled.
Mean of duplicate samples:
PM2.6: 62 jjg/m3
Fe: 26 jjg/m3
Mn: 240 ng/m3
Cr: 84 ng/m3
Variability: 1-15%
Personal samples had
significantly higher concentration
of iron, manganese, and
chromium than home indoor and
ambient samples. The ratios of
Fe (ng//yg of PM2.6) vs Mn
(pgl fjg PM2.E) showed personal
samples to be twice the ratio for
crustal material. Similarly for the
Cr/Mn ratio.
The ratios and strong
correlations between pairs of
elements suggested steel dust as
the source. Time-activity data
suggested subways as a source
July 2009
A-309
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Particle Sizes Measured
Component
Results
Primary Findings
of the elevated personal metal
levels.
Jansen et al. (2005, 082236) Personal, Micro, and Ambient: Estimated Elemental Carbon Mean (SD), units - jjg/m3:
PM2.6 (Abs)
Elemental composition of a
subset of personal, indoor and
outdoor samples PM2.6
Abs
S
Zn
Fe
K
Ca
Cu
Si
CI
For most elements, personal and
indoor
concentrations were lower than
and highly correlated with
outdoor concentrations. The
highest correlations (median
r.0.9) were found for sulfur and
particle absorbance (EC), which
both represent fine
mode particles from outdoor
origin. Low correlations were
observed for elements that
represent the coarser part of the
PM2.6 particles (Ca, Cu, Si, CI).
Molnar et al. (2006,156773)
Personal: PM2.6 and PM1
Micro and Ambient: NR
S
CI
K
Ca
Ti
V
Mn
Fe
Ni
Cu
Zn
Br
Pb
Urban background PM2.6
mean, median, range
S 620 320 95-1900
CI 97 54 25-460
K 55 50 32-130
Ca 21 17 6.6-6.2
Ti 2.1 1.9 1.3-3.8
V 3.4 2.41.0-13
Mn 1.6 1.4 0.67- 3.8
Fe 36 33 7.1-100
Ni 1.6 1.2 0.33- 5.7
Cu 2.1 1.4 0.33-11
Zn 14 11 2.8-38
Br 1.7 1.4 0.47-44.3
Pb 3.3 2.1 0.94-11
Personal PM2.6
mean, median, range
S- < 470 270-1400
CI 270 170 60-920
K 140 96 39-690
Ca 110 80 27-670
Ti 11 9.5 3.7-27
V4.7 4.0 2.7-9.4
Mn ¦ ¦ ¦
Fe 68 69 23-150
Ni 4.2 2.6 0.89-46
Cu 10 6.6 1.1-81
Zn 21 16 6.6-70
Br 2.01.3 0.91-14
Pb 2.9 2.6 0.92-8.3
Personal PM1
S- < 470 240-1200
CI - < 110 54-160
K 80 82 50-130
Ca 32 23 8.4-87
Ti6.5 6.3 3.7-11
V- < 4.2 2.8-8.9
Mn ¦ ¦ ¦
Fe 28 25 7.6-68
Ni 8.2 1.2 0.83-58
Cu 5.0 4.4 1.6-14
Zn 15 14 7.6-37
PM2.E personal exposures were
significantly higher than both
outdoor and urban background
for the elements CI, K, Ca, Ti,
Fe, and Cu.
Personal exposure was also
higher tan indoor levels of CI, Ca,
Ti, Fe, and Br, but lower than
outdoor Pb./ Residential outdoor
levels were significantly higher
than the corresponding indoor
levels for Br and Pb, but lower
for Ti and Cu. The residential
levels were also significantly
higher than the urban
background for most elements.
July 2009
A-310
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference Particle Sizes Measured Component
Results
Primary Findings
Br 1.6 1.5 0.83-4.4
Pb 3.6 2.8 1.1-11
Residential Outdoor PM2.6
mean, median, range
S 640 460 190-1800
CI 6.3 140 57-840
K 200 78 32-200
Ca 82 28 4.6-85
Ti 34 5.2 3.3-21
V 6.3 3.9 2.1-14
Mn
Fe 5.5 31 8.8-200
Ni 45 < 1.6 0.65-5.5
Cu 2.6 1.3 0.65-17
Zn 22 15 5.5-85
Br 2.0 >450 0.91-51
Pb 4.6 2.6 0.90-20
Residential Outdoor PM1
S - 1.3 24-2000
CI- < 11044-170
K 76 68 34-170
Ca- < 125.1-78
Ti- < 5.0 2.2-9.5
V 5.6 4.47 2.2-14
Mn
Fe 23 14 3.7-140
Ni 3.3 1.4 0.73-28
Cu- < 1.1 0.73-12
Zn 15 14 5.2-30
Br 1.5 1.40.78-4.3
Pb 4.1 1.51.0-17
Kulkarni and Patil (2003, Personal: PM5
Lead
Personal samples:
All listed metals were detected
156664) Micro: NR
Nickel
Cadmium
Mean ± SD
in the ambient air where as only
Lead, Cadmium, Manganese, and
Ambient: PM5
Copper
Type
Potassium were detected in
Chromium
Lead
personal exposures. Mean daily
Potassium
Occupational
exposure to lead exceeds the
Iron
4.384 ± 7.766/yg/m3
Indian NAAQS by a factor of 4.2.
Manganese
Residential
4.093 ± 5.925/yg/m3
24-h integrated
4.205 ± 1.523/yg/m3
Cadmium
However, ambient concentration
of lead conforms to this
standard. There is a rising trend
in the personal exposures and
ambient levels of cadmium.
However, they are low and do
Occupational
0.201 ± 0.158/yg/m3
not pose any major health risk as
yet. Personal exposures to toxic
metals exceed the corresponding
Residential
ambient levels by a large factor
0.111 ± 0.165/yg/m3
ranging from 6.1 to 13.2. Thus,
24-h integrated
ambient concentrations may
0.134 ± 0.140 //g/m3
underestimate health risk due to
Manganese
personal exposure of toxic
metals. Outdoor exposure to
Occupational
toxic metals is greater than the
1.979 ± 7.842/yglm3
indoor (ratios ranging from 2.3 to
Residential
1.1) except for potassium (ratio
0.180 ± 0.261 /yglm3
0.77). However, there is no
24-h integrated
significant correlation between
1.983 ± 6.824/yg/m3
these two.
Potassium
Occupational
3.473 ± 4.691 //gfm3
July 2009
A-311
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Particle Sizes Measured
Component
Results
Primary Findings
Residential
4.589 ± 4.619/yg/m3
24-h integrated Check
Wu et al. (2006,179950)
Personal: PM2.6
Micro: PM2.6
Ambient: PM2.6
levoglucosan (LG)
Elemental Carbon (EC)
Organic Carbon (OC)
Mean personal exposure:
LG: 0.018 (0.024)
EC: 0.4(0.5)
OC: 8.5 (2.7).
Ambient: check component
Authors "found a significant
between-subject variation
between episodes and non-
episodes in both the Exposure
during agricultural burning
estimates and subjects' activity
During non-burning times: 0.026
(0.030)
During burning episodes: 0.010
(0.012)
patterns. This suggests that the
LG measurements at the central
site may not always represent
individual exposures to
agricultural burning smoke
"Evidence of "Hawthorne
Effect": During declared episodes
(i.e. real and sham), subjects
spent less time indoors at home
and more time in transit or
indoors away from home than
during non-declared episode
periods. The differences
remained even when limited to
weekdays only.
Larson et al. (2004, 098145) Personal: PM2.6
Micro: PM2.6 outside subject's
residence, and inside residence
Ambient: PM2.6 at Central
outdoor site (downtown Seattle)
Light absorbing carbon (LAC) and
trace elements
Personal Rl RO Central Mass
10,500 10,250 12,693 11,970
Al 32 19 21 31
As 1 1 2 2
LAC * 1439 01105 1830 1741
Br 3 2 3 3
Ca 72 46 36 50
CI 248 173 75 78
Cr 2 2 1 2
Cu 3 4 2 3
Fe 63 35 61 95
K 57 54 78 67
Mn 2 2 3 6
Ni
Five sources of PM2.6 identified:
vegetative burning, mobile
emissions, secondary sulfate, a
source rich in chlorine, and
crustal-derived material. The
burning of vegetation (in homes)
contributed more PM2.6 mass on
avg than any other sources in all
microenvironments.
Brunekreef et al. (2005,
090486)
Personal, Micro & Ambient:
PM2.6
Nitrate
Mean (SD), units - ng/m3:
Amsterdam:
Personal 1389(1965)
Indoor 1348(1843)
outdoor 4063(4435)
Helsinki:
Personal 161(202)
Indoor 267(215)
Outdoor 1276(1181)
In both cities personal and indoor
PM2.6 were lower than highly
correlated with outdoor
concentrations. For most
elements, personal and indoor
concentrations were also highly
correlated with outdoor
concentrations.
Sorenson et al. (2005, 089428)
Personal: PM2.6 & Black smoke
(BS)
Micro: PM2.6 & Black smoke (BS)
Ambient: Street monitoring
station and roof of a campus
building PM2.6 81 Black smoke
(BS)
Black Smoke (also NO2)
Mean, IQR, Units - jjg/m3:
Personal:
Cold Season: 10.2 (5.6-14.8)
Warm Season: 7.1 (5.5-11.4)
Micro:
Cold Season
Home Indoor: 6.2 (5.5-11.4)
Home front door: 10.8 (7.4-16.3)
Warm Season
Home Indoor: 6.1 (3.7-7.6)
Home front door: 8.8 (5.6-11.54)
Ambient:
Cold Season: Street Station:
Indoor sources of PM and BS (as
well as NO2) were shown to be
greatly influenced by indoor
sources.
July 2009
A-312
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Particle Sizes Measured
Component
Results
Primary Findings
31.6 (27.5-34.0)
Urban Background: 7.7 (5.9-
11.0)
Warm Season:
Street Station: 30.6 (24.7-36.0)
Urban Background: 6.8 (4.6-8.6)
Ho et al. (2004, 056804)
Personal: PM2.6
OC
Mean, unit - jjg/m3
The major source of indoor EC,
Micro: NR
EC
Indoors:
OC, and PM2.6 appears to be
Ambient: PM2.6
OM
TCA
OM - 18.1; TCA - 22.9
Outdoors:
OM - 20.1; TCA - 26.5
penetration of outdoor air, with
a much greater attenuation in
mechanically ventilated
buildings.
Maitreetal. (2002,156726)
Personal: PM4
Micro: NR
Ambient: PM4
PAH, benxene-toluene-xylenes
(BTX), aldehydes, BaP
PAHc, formaldehyde,
Median
Resp jjg/m3
BaP ng/m3
PAHc ng/m3
PAH ng/m3
Benzene
Mg/m3
Toluene jjg/m3
Xylene jjg/m3
BTX jjg/m3
Formaldehyde jjg/m3
Acetaldehyde jjg/m3
Aldehyde jjg/m3
The occupational exposure of
policemen does not exceed any
currently applicable occupational
or medical exposure limits.
Individual particulate levels
should preferably be monitored in
Grenoble in winter to avoid
underestimations.
Farmer et al. (2003, 089017)
Personal: PM10
PM10
Prague-SM
Extractable organic matter
Micro: NR
EOM
EOM (/yg/m3)
(EOM) per PM10 was at least 2-
E0M2
fold higher in winter than in
Ambient: PM10
B[a]P
E0M2 (%)
summer, and c-PAHs over 10-
PM2.6 (not reported)
c-PAHsb
B[a]P (/yg/m3)
fold higher in winter than in
c-PAHsb (/yg/m3)
summer. Personal exposure to
Prague-LB
B[a]P and to total c-PAHs in
Prague ca. was 2-fold higher in
EOM (/yg/m3)
the exposed group compared to
E0M2 (%)
the control group, in Kosice ca.
B[a]P (/yg/m3)
3-fold higher, and in Sofia ca.
2.5-fold higher.
c-PAHsb (/yg/m3)
Kosice
EOM (/yg/m3)
E0M2 (%)
B[a]P (/yg/m3)
c-PAHsb (/yg/m3)
Sofia
EOM (/yg/m3)
E0M2 (%)
B[a]P (/yg/m3)
c-PAHsb (/yg/m3)
Hanninen et al. (2004, 056812)
Personal: PM2.6
PM2.E -bound sulphur
Associated with indoor
Micro: NR
Athens
concentration: wooden building
material, city, building age, floor
Ambient: PM2.6
Basel
of residence (i.e. ground, 1st,
Helsinki
etc.), and use of stove other than
electric.
July 2009
A-313
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference Particle Sizes Measured Component
Results
Primary Findings
Shilton et al. (2002, 049602)
Personal, Micro, and Ambient:
Respirable PM
Respirable PM, metals (Zn, Cu,
Mn, Al), sulphate, nitrate, and
chloride
Prague
Indoor
Outdoor
Zn (ng/m3) 241.1 179.5
Cu (ng/m3) 43.3 24.99
Mn (ng/m3) 15.6 4.18
Al (ng/m3) 305.2 52.90
S04 (ng/m3) 4.72 3.47
CI (ng/m3) 1.08 0.15
NO3 (ng/m3).35 1.08
Measurement Mean s.d.
Ambient SO4 2.72* 3.11
Ambient ABS 1.4** 1.0
Personal SO41.33* 1.47
Personal ABS 1.0** 1.7
* Mean SO4 values reported
in/yg/m3
** Mean ABS values reported in
10'6/m-1
Mean (SD), units - jjg/m3:
Personal
Ambient
S04
Summer
5.9 (4.2)
7.7 (4.8)
Fall
4.4 (3.3)
6.2 (4.7)
EC
Summer
1.1 (0.6)
1.1 (0.5)
Fall
1.2(0.7)
1.1 (0.7)
The indoor particulate cone was
driven by ambient cone;
meteorological-induced changes
in ambient PM were detected
indoors;
SO4 and light absorbing carbon
concentrations had higher
personal-ambient correlations
and less variability. This
indicates that SO4 and ABS were
of outdoor origin, while PM2.B
mass was of varied indoor and
outdoor origin.
High association between
personal and ambient S042~ and
EC, especially for SO42 for
which there is no significant
indoor source.
Noulett et al. (2006,155999) Personal: PM2.6 SO4
iyijcro. [y|fj ABS (light absorbing carbon)
Ambient: PM2.6
Sarnat et al. (2006, 089784) Personal: PM2.6 SO4
Micro: NR
Ambient: PM2.5
EC
Sarnat et al. (2005 RMID 9171) Personal: PM2.6
(2005,08Z531) Micm:n)a
Ambient: PM2.6
SO4, O3, NO2, SO2
Correlations between personal
PM2.E and ambient gas
O3 correlated in summer.
Spearman's R ~ 0.4, anti-
correlated in winter, R ~ 0.3-0.1.
NOx somewhat correlated in
summer. R ~ 0.3
Winter, R — 0.2-0.4
SO2 not well correlated in
summer or winter. R ~ 0-0.1.
CO somewhat correlated in
summer. R nO.1-0.3.
Correlated in winter R ~ 0.2-0.3.
No results were significant.
Substantial correlations between
ambient PM2.6 concentrations
and corresponding personal
exposures.
Summertime gaseous pollutant
concentrations may be better
surrogates of personal PM2.6
exposures (especially personal
exposures to PM2.6 of ambient
origin) than they are surrogates
of personal exposures to the
gases themselves.
Brunekreef et al. (2005, Personal, Micro, and Ambient: SO42, N03-
Mean, units - jjg/m3:
In both cities personal and indoor
July 2009
A-314
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Particle Sizes Measured
Component
Results
Primary Findings
090486)
PM2.6
SO42-:
Amsterdam
Helsinki
NOs-:
PM2.B were lower than highly
correlated with outdoor
concentrations. For most
elements, personal and indoor
concentrations were also highly
correlated with outdoor
concentrations.
Amsterdam
Helsinki
Kimetal. (2005,156640)
Personal: PM2.6
Micro: NR
Ambient: PM2.6
Sulfate, Elemental carbon (EC),
Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium,
Sodium
Mean (SD), units -
SO42-: 2.7 (3.2)
Ca2+: 0.12(0.12)
Mg2+: 0.02 (0.01)
K: 0.07 (0.08)
Na+: 0.09(0.20)
EC: 0.60 (0.54)
jjg/m3: Traffic-related combustion,
regional, and local crustal
materials were found to
contribute 19% ± 17%,
52% ±22%, and 10% ±7%,
respectively.
Among participants that spent
considerable time indoors,
exposure to outdoor PM2.6
includes a greater relative
contribution from combustion
sources, compared with outdoor
(ambient) PM2.6 measurements.
Wallace and Williams (2005,
Personal: PM2.6
Sulfur
Mean (SD), units - ng/m3:
Generally, infiltration factor
057485)
Indoor Micro: PM2.6
Outdoor Micro: PM2.6
Personal: 1046 (633)
Indoor: 1098 (652)
Outdoor: 1951 (1137)
provides a reliable estimate of
personal exposure. Sulfur can be
used in lieu of personal exposure
to PM because it is derived from
outdoors.
Jacquemin et al. (2007,192372)
Personal: PM2.6
Sulfur
Mean, units - jjg/m3:
Authors suggest that"outdoor
Micro: NA
Ambient: PM2.6
Personal: 1.3 outdoor: 1.2
measurements of absorbance
and sulphur can be used to
estimate both the daily variation
and levels of personal exposures
also in Southern European
countries, especially when
exposure to ETS has been taken
into account. For PM2.6, indoor
sources need to be carefully
considered."
July 2009
A-315
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table A-57. Summary of personal PM exposure source apportionment studies.
Reference
Study Design
Results
Primary Findings
Hopke et al. (2003, 095544)
Source apportionment of personal (PEM)
and indoor central and apartment (VAPS)
and outdoor (VAPS) PM2.6, Baltimore
retirement home with 10 elderly subjects,
July-Aug 1998.
% contr
External
Secondary
S042"
Unknown
Soil
Internal
Gypsum
Activity
Personal care
63% of personal exposure could be
attributed to outdoor sources (with 46%
from sulfate), and resuspension of indoor
PM during vacuuming, cleaning, or other
activities contributed 36% of personal
exposure.
Larson et al. (2004, 098145)
Source apportionment of personal (PEM)
and residences (HI) and central outdoor
(HI) PM2.E around Seattle with 10 elderly
subjects and 10 asthmatic children, Sep
2000 and May 2001. The purpose of the
article was to compare PMF2 and PMF3
methods.
PMF2:
% contr
Veg burn
Mobile
Fuel oil
S, Mn, Fe
Secondary
CI-rich
Crustal
Crustal2
Results showed that vegetative burning
was the largest contributor to personal
exposure and that was related to outdoor
combustion. Crustal exposures were
related to indoor activities.
PMF3:
% contr
Veg burn
Mobile
Secondary
Crustal
Zhao et al. (2006,156181)
Source apportionment of personal (PEM)
and residential indoor (HI) and residential
outdoor (HI) and central outdoor (HI)
PM2.E, Raleigh and Chapel Hill NC with 38
subjects, summer 2000 and Spring 2001.
% contr
Motor vehicle
Soil
Secondary S042~
Secondary N03-
ETS
Personal care
and activity
CU-factor mix
w indoor soil
Cooking
Secondary sulfate was the largest
ambient source and the largest ambient
contribution to personal exposure.
Cooking produced the largest contribution
to personal and indoor concentrations.
Note that sums over 100% because
multiple sources obscured PMF resolution
July 2009
A-316
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Study Design
Results
Primary Findings
Meng et al. (2007, 091197)
Source apportioned infiltration for
personal (PEM) and residential indoor (HI)
and residential outdoor (HI) and central
outdoor (HI) PM2.E, Los Angeles, Houston,
and Elizabeth, NJ with 100 non-smoking
residences and residents in each city, in
each season between summer 1999 and
spring 2001 (RI0PA).
% contr
(Outdoor
Origin)
Mechanically generated
Primary Combustion
Secondary Formation*
"excludes nitrates
Differential infiltration of the PM2.6
resulted in a reduction of secondary
formation products relative to outdoors.
Reff et al. (2007,156045)
Functional group distinction for personal
(PEM) and residential indoor (HI) and
residential outdoor (HI) and central
outdoor (HI) PM2.E, Los Angeles, Houston,
and Elizabeth, NJ with 100 non-smoking
residences and residents in each city, in
each season between summer 1999 and
spring 2001 (RIOPA). PM2.6 samples from
219 homes were used for this analysis.
SO42':
R
0
1
P
C - 0:
The main finding was that indoor and
personal levels of CH in organic carbons
were found to be substantially higher
than outdoors. This reduced the polarity
of indoor and personal organic carbons
CH:
R
0
1
P
Zhao et al. (2007,156182)
Source apportionment of personal (PEM) % contr
and indoor school (FRM) and outdoor
school (FRM) PM2.6, Denver with 56
asthmatic children, Oct 2002-March
2003 and Oct 2003-March 2004.
% contr
The largest personal exposure was from
Secondary SO42'
cooking (54.8%), but motor vehicle
emissions were the largest outdoor
Soil
contributor (13.3%) to personal exposure.
Secondary NO3'
Secondary nitrate comprised the largest
Motor vehicle
outdoor source but accounted for only
Cl-based cleaning
9.4% of personal exposure.
Cooking
ETS
Strand et al. (2006, 089203) Using positive matrix factorization and an Estimation method, Mean (SD, range): Similar results were found with each
extrapolation method to estimate PM2.B PMF-7 42 (1 93 3 43-12 89) technique.
based on SO42 and Fe components.
Extrapolation Method:
Using sulphate: 6.38 (1.60, 3.20 ¦ 10.97)
Using sulphate & iron: 6.50 (1.36, 3.54 ¦
10.12)
Using sulphate 81 iron, temperature
adjusted: 7.02 (1.48, 3.79 - 11.02)
Using sulphate (no gamma): 8.23 (2.06,
4.12-14.14)
July 2009 A-317 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table A-54. Summary of PM infiltration studies.
Reference
Study Design
Finf
Allen et al. (2003, 053578)
Objective: Enhance knowledge of the
outdoor contribution to total indoor and
personal PM exposures.
Methods: Continuous light scattering
monitoring.
Subjects: Elderly and children spending
most of their time indoors. Healthy
individuals, elderly with COPD or CHD
and children with asthma. 44 residences
measured for 55 10-day sessions.
Seattle, WA.
PM2.6 avg- 0.65 ± 0.21;
Non-heating season- 0.79 ± 0.1 £
Heating season- 0.53 ± 0.16;
Open windows (mean)- 0.69;
Closed windows (mean)- 0.58;
All days (mean)- 0.65
Light scattering (whole peak): 0.75 ±
0.25;
Light scattering (uncensored data): 0.77
± 0.24;
Sulfur concentration (slope): 0.65 ± 0.01
Arhami et al. (2009,190096)
Objective: To examine associations
between size-segregated PM, their
particle components, and gaseous co-
pollutants.
Methods: Data analyzed with linear
mixed-effect models.
Subjects: Four different retirement
communities in San Gabriel Valley, CA
and Riverside, CA. 2005-2007.
PM2.6: 0.38-0.57
EC: 0.64-0.82
OC: 0.60-0.98
n/a
Balasubramanian et al. (2007,156248)
Objective: PM monitoring and
assessment based on analysis of
chemical and physical characteristics or
indoor and outdoor particles.
Methods: Particle number and mass
concentrations measured using real-time
particle counter and low-volume
particulate sampler.
Subjects: 3 residential indoor and 1
residential outdoor environments in Choa
Chu Kang, Singapore. May 12-May 23,
2004.
n/a
PM2.1,: 0.93-1.90
Chemical Species: CI': 0.35-0.45,
NO?-: 2.50-4.13,
NOs": 1.41-5.41,
S042:1.21-1.70,
Na+: 0.43-0.74,
NH4: 1.43-2.39,
EC: 0.75-0.96,
OC: 1.04-1.92,
Al: 1.04-1.92,
Co: 0.86-1.32,
Cr: 1.35-2.90,
Cu: 0.50-0.69,
Fe: 0.30-0.42,
Mn: 0.23-0.42,
Pb: 0.40-2.47,
Zn: 0.59-0.81,
Cd: 0.74-1.75,
Ni: 0.71-1.32,
Ti: 0.73-0.78,
V: 1.01-1.05
Barn et al. (2008,156252) Objective: Measure infiltration factor
PM2.6 (mean)- Summer: HEPA- 0.19 ±
Mean- Summer: HEPA- 0.43, Unfiltered-
from PM2.6 from forest fires and
0.20, Unfiltered- 0.61 ± 0.27
0.77
determine effectiveness of HEPA filter.
Winter: HEPA-0.10 ± 0.08, Unfiltered-
Winter: HEPA-0.21, Unfiltered- 0.36
Methods: pDR for ambient air sampling.
0.28 ± 0.18
Both: HEPA- 0.25, Unfiltered- 0.47
Subjects: Homes affected by forest fire
Both: HEPA-0.13 ± 0.14, Unfiltered-
or residential wood smoke. British
0.42 ± 0.27
Columbia, Canada. 38 homes sampled
(valid samples: 19 winter, 13 summer).
July 2009
A-318
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Study Design
Finf
Baxter et al. (2007, 092726)
Objective: To develop predictive models
of residential indoor air pollutant
concentrations for lower SES, urban
households. Part of ACCESS cohort study
of asthma etiology.
Methods: Regression analysis; mass
balance model; Finf from slope in
univariate regression analyses.
Subjects: Lower SES populations. 43
homes, 23 homes monitored in both
seasons, 15 in the non-heating season
(May-Oct) only, 5 in heating season (Dec-
Mar) only; 2003-2005.
PM2.b: 0.91 ±0.23
Chemical species: EC: 0.72 ± 0.49;
Ca: 0.56 ± 0.30;
Fe: 0.38 ± 0.26;
K: 0.83 ± 0.52;
Si: 0.02 ± 0.00;
Na: 0.46 ± 0.43;
CI: 0.40 ± 0.12;
Zn: 0.85 ± 0.28;
S: 0.95 ± 0.78;
V: 0.60 ± 0.77
PM2.6 (coefficient of variation (CV)): 1.14
(0.71)
Chemical species (coefficient of variation
(CV)): EC (CV): 0.89 (0.64);
Ca (CV): 1.16 (1.90);
Fe (CV): 0.69(1.40);
K (CV): 1.10(0.95);
Si (CV): 1.04(1.31);
Na (CV): 1.05(1.84);
CI (CV): 3.18(3.79);
Zn (CV): 0.83 ± (1.13);
S (CV): 0.76 ± (0.32);
V (CV): 0.76 ± (0.46)
Baxter et al. (2007, 092725)
Objective: To predict residential indoor
concentrations of traffic-related air
pollutants in lower SES urban households.
Part of ACCESS cohort study of asthma
etiology.
Methods: Regression modeling, Bayesian
variable selection I/O is slope from
multivariate model
Subjects: Lower statuses, urban
households in Boston, MA. 43 sites
among 39 households, 66 sampling
sessions, nonheating (May-Oct) and
heating (Dec-Mar) 2003-2005
n/a
PM2.E: Ambient Concentrations X Open
Windows- 0.98;
Ambient Concentrations X Closed
Windows- 0.64
EC: Ambient Concentrations- 0.38
Brown et al. (2008,190894)
Objective: To examine if ambient, home
outdoor, and home indoor particle
concentrations can be used as proxies of
corresponding personal exposure.
Methods: Associations characterized
using univariate mixed effects models
that included a random subject term.
Subjects: 15 participants in Boston, MA
in winter (Nov. 1999-Jan. 2000) and
summer (June-July 2000).
n/a
PM2.6: Winter- Median: 1.2, Range: 0.8-
1.8; Summer- Median: 0.9, Range: 0.6-
1.2
EC: Winter- Median: 1.1, Range: 0.7-4.5;
Summer- Median-1.0, Range: 0.9-1.3
SO42': Winter- Median: 0.5, Range: 0.3-
0.8; Summer- Median: 0.8, Range: 0.4-
1.0
Cao et al. (2005,156321)
Objective: To determine relationships
and distributions of indoor and outdoor
PM2.6, OC, and EC. To determine
indoor/outdoor sources to indoor
carbonaceous aerosol.
Methods: Gravimetric analysis to
determine PM2.6 concentrations. OC and
EC determined by TOR following
IMPROVE protocol.
Subjects: 6 residences in Hong Kong (2
roadside, 2 urban, 2 rural). March 6-April
18,2004.
n/a
20min PM2.b- Roadside: 0.7-4.0, Urban:
0.9-6.7, Rural: 0.5-1.7
24h PM2.b- Roadside: 0.8-1.4, Urban: 1.2-
2.0, Rural: 1.0-1.8
OC (average and range)- Roadside: 1.9
(1.1-2.3), Urban: 2.3 (1.5-4.0), Rural: 1.3
(1.2-2.2)
EC (average and range)- Roadside: 1.0
(0.9-1.1), Urban: 1.1 (0.8-1.3), Rural: 1.1
(0.9-1.8)
July 2009
A-319
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Study Design
Finf
Cortez-Lugo et al. (2008,156368)
Objective: To determine personal PM2.6 n/a
and its relationship with outdoor and
indoor PM2.6and PM10.
Methods: Linear regression model used
to compare personal and indoor PM2.6. I/O
variation studied using analysis of
variance and predictors determined by
generalized estimating equation models.
I/O PM2.6 ratio transformed into natural
logarithm.
Subjects: 38 nonsmoking long time
Mexico residents with COPD. Mexico
City, Mexico. Feb-Nov 2000.
PM2.6: Average- 1.2, Range- 0.05-6.1
Crist et al. (2008,156372)
Objective: To examine correlations
between personal, indoor, and outdoor
PM2.E exposures in children.
Methods: Indoor and personal samples
by Whatman Teflon filters. Ambient
samples taken by TEOMs.
Subjects: Fourth and fifth-grade children.
1 school in Athens, OH and 2 schools
inColumbus, OH. No pre-existing health
conditions. 90 children (30 at each site),
3 of which had personal monitors. 194-
332 days of indoor, outdoor, and personal
samples. N samples taken at schools
range 31-235.
n/a
Mean PM2.6 Mass Concentrations
(|jg/m3)- Athens: school-day- 2.61 ±
5.76, Non-school-day- 0.8 ± 0.7
Koebel: school-day-1.71 ± 3.17, non-
school-day- 1.27 ±1.16
New Albany: school-day- 2.98 ± 5.47,
non-school-day- 0.82 ± 0.6
Diapouli et al. (2008,190893)
Objective: To characterize the PM10, n/a
PM2.6, UFP concentrations at primary
schools. To examine the relationship
between indoor and outdoor
concentrations.
Methods: Chemical analysis of collected
filters. Regressions to examine
correlations between indoor and outdoor
concentrations.
Subjects: 7 primary schools with
different characterizations of urbanization
and traffic density in Athens, Greece. No
ventilation system. Nov. 2003-Feb. 2004
and Oct.-Dec. 2004.
PM10: 0.54-2.46
PM2.5- 0.67-2.77
UFP- 0.33-0.74
Dimitroulopoulou et al. (2006, 090302)
Objective: T0 develop a probabilistic n/a
indoor air model (INDAIR).
Methods: INDAIR predicts frequency
distributions of concentrations of up to 4
pollutants simultaneously (NO2, CO, PM10,
PM2.6). 3 scenarios- no source, gas
cooking, smoking.
Subjects: 5 UK sites- Harwell (rural),
Birmingham East (urban background),
Bradford (urban center), Bloomsbury
(urban center), Marylebone Road
(roadside). Winter (October 1-March 31),
summer (April 1 -September 30), 1997-
1999.
No source- PM10: 0.5-0.65;
PM2.6: 0.6-0.7
Gas cooking- PM10: 0.6-0.9 (bedroom),
1.0-2.0 (lounge), 1.6-4.3 (kitchen);
PM2.6: 0.74-0.9 (bedroom), 0.9-1.6
(lounge), 1.6-2.9 (kitchen)
Smoking- PM10: 0.7-1.1 (bedroom), 1.1-
2.7 (lounge), 1.1-2.5 (kitchen);
PM2.6: 0.8-1.3 (bedroom), 1.3-2.8
(lounge), 1.4-2.6 (kitchen)
July 2009
A-320
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Study Design
Finf
Fromme et al. (2008,155147)
Objective: To characterize the chemical n/a
and morphological properties of PM in
classrooms and in corresponding outdoor
air.
Methods: PM Finf derived from sulfate Finf
and a correction factor that results from
division of B™ (increase of indoor PM per
outdoor PM, linear relationship) by Bsulf
(increase of indoor sulfate per outdoor
sulfate, linear relationship). If no indoor
source, the sulfate Fm is equal to the
sulfate I/O.
Subjects: Primary school in northern
Munich. Densely populated residential
area 160m away from a very busy street.
Classrooms had 21-23 students.
Sampling during teaching hours. Oct.-Nov.
2005.
PMio: Sulfate- 0.3,
Nitrate- 0.1,
CI- 0.6,
Na- 0.9,
Ammonium- 0.1,
Mg- 0.6,
Ca-1.4,
EC- 0.7,
0C- 1.1
PM2.6:
Sulfate- 0.4,
Nitrate- 0.2,
CI- 0.5,
Na- 0.6,
Ammonium- 0.3,
Mg- 0.5,
Ca-1.6
Guoet al. (2004,156506)1
Objective: To investigate pollutant
concentrations at air-conditioned and non-
air-conditioned markets. To compare
indoor air quality with the Hong Kong
standard.
Methods: PM10 concentrations measured
by Hi-Vol sampler correlated with
corresponding levels measured by Dust-
Trak monitor.
Subjects: 3 non-air-conditioned and 2 air-
conditioned markets in Hong Kong. Sept.
2001-Jan. 2002.
n/a
PM10: Non-air-conditioned-
conditioned- —0.98
- 0.7, Air-
Hanninenet al. (2004, 056812)2
Objective: T0 assess indoor PM2.6 by
origin and potential determinants.
Methods: Part of EXPOLIS study. Pump
and filter with gravimetric analysis.
Univariate single and stepwise-multiple
regression analyses.
Subjects: Residential homes in Athens,
Greece; Basle, Switzerland; Helsinki,
Finland; Prague, Czech Republic. Homes
by city: Athens 50, Basle 50, Helsinki
189, Prague 49.
PM2.6 (mean): Athens- 0.70 ± 0.12,Basle-
0.63 ± 0.15,Helsinki- 0.59 ±
0.17,Prague- 0.61 ± 0.14
Sulfur (mean): Athens- 0.82 ± 0.14,
Basle- 0.80 ± 0.19, Helsinki- 0.70 ±
0.20, Prague- 0.72 ± 0.16
PM2.6: Athens- —0.84, Basle- —1.37,
Helsinki- —1.30, Prague- —1.33
Sulfur: Athens- — 0.70, Basle- — 0.80,
Helsinki- —0.74, Prague- —0.77
Ho et al. (2004, 056804)3
Objective: PM2.6, OC, and EC exposure
assessment of occupied buildings located
near major roadways under natural
ventilation (NV) and mechanical
ventilation (MV).
Methods: Co-located mini-volume
samplers and Partisol model 2000
sampler with 2.5 micron inlet. IMPROVE
TOR carbon analysis.
Subjects: Occupants of MV (1 classroom
and office) and NV (3 residences)
buildings located within 10m of major
roadway; Hong Kong, China. Sep. 2002-
Feb. 2003.
PM2.6: 0.42
EC- MV: 0.42, NV: 0.76
OC- MV: 0.66, NV: 0.71
PM2.6 (average)- 0.2-1.6; MV (average)-
< 0.7; NV (average)- 0.6-1.6
EC- Range: 0.5±0.1 - 1.1 ±0.4
OC- Range: 0.6±0.2- 1.5±1.0
July 2009
A-321
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Study Design
Finf
Hoeketal. (2008,156554)
Objective: Exposure assessmentof
indoor/outdoor particle
relationships.RUPIOH study.
Methods: Sampling by condensation
particle counters and Harvard impactors.
Gravimetric analysis and reflectance.
Calculations performed for 24h avg
concentrations. Finf estimated by linear
regression analysis.
Subjects: 4 European cities (Helsinki,
Finland; Athens, Greece; Amsterdam, The
Netherlands; Birmingham, England).
Urban populations. >35yrs. Asthma or
COPD. Non smoking households. Work
< 16h/wk outside home. 153 homes
sampled Oct. 2002-Mar. 2004.
Regression slope for indoor vs. central n/a
site outdoor- PM2.6: 0.30-0.51;
PM10: 0.17-0.41;
PM10 2.B: 0.01-0.17;
Sulfate: 0.59-0.78,;
Soot: 0.43-0.87
Regression slope for indoor vs. residential
outdoor- PM2.6: 0.34-0.48;
PM10: 0.26-0.44;
PMio-2.b: 0.11-0.16;
Soot: 0.63-0.84
Hopke et al. (2003, 095544)
Objective: To use advanced factor
analysis models to identify and quantify
PM sources. 1998 BPMEES data.
Methods: PEM, outdoor and indoor
sampling of unoccupied apartment in
retirement facility. PMF used to derive
source contributions. Multilinear Engine
used to derive joint factors.
Subjects: 10 non-smoking elderly
subjects of mean age 84 who did not
cook.Towson, MD. July 26-Aug. 22,
1998.
Nitrate-sulfate- 0.03;
Sulfate- 0.38;
0C- 0.77;
MV Exhaust- 0.32
n/a
Hystad et al. (2008,190890)
Objective: To explore the feasibility of
modeling residential PM2.6 Finf for occupied
residences using data readily available for
most of North America.
Methods: Fm calculated by recursive
mass balance model where Finf is a
function of penetration efficiency,
particle removal rate, and air exchange.
Subjects: 46 residences in Seattle, WA
1999-2003. 38 nonsmoking residences in
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada 2006.
Heating (Oct.-Feb.) and nonheating
(March-Sept.).
Seattle: Mean (all)- 0.59 ± 0.21, Mean
(detached residences)- 0.60 ± 0.20
Victoria: Mean (all)- 0.62 ± 0.22, Mean
(detached residences)- 0.59 ± 0.22
n/a
Klinmalee et al. (2008,190888)
Objective: T0 monitor indoor and outdoor n/a
pollution in an university campus and
shopping center.
Methods: PM measured by PEM and
quartz filters. Analyzed for mass, water
soluble ions by ion chromatography, and
black carbon by a smokestain
reflectometer. I/O calculated for each
sample pair then average taken.
Subjects: University campus and
shopping center in northern suburb of
Bangkok, Thailand. Dec. 2005-Feb. 2006.
PM2.6: University- Weekdays: 0.6,
Weekends: 0.5; Shopping center-
Weekdays: 1.5, Weekends: 2.0
BC in PM2.6: University- 0.9, Shopping
center- 0.67
July 2009
A-322
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Study Design
Finf
Koistinen et al. (2004,156655)
Objective: To identify PM2.6 sources in
personal exposures with principal
component analysis of the elemental
compositions in residential outdoor,
indoor, and workplace indoor
microenvironments. Part of EXPOLIS
study.
Methods: Principal component analysis
to identify sources of microenvironmental
and personal PM2.6 exposure. Specific
mass contributions of sources calculated
by source reconstruction.
Subjects: Non smoking, 25-55yrs.
Helsinki, Finland. Oct. 1996-Dec. 1997.
n/a
Median seasonal- PM2.6: Winter- 0.77,
Spring- 1.03, Summer- 0.95, Fall- 0.92,
Total- 0.92
Pb: Winter- 0.67, Spring- 0.56, Summer-
0.86, Fall- 0.69, Total- 0.67
S: Winter- 0.60, Spring- 0.63, Summer-
0.90, Fall- 0.75, Total- 0.69
Br: Winter- 0.57, Spring- 0.72, Summer-
0.98, Fall- 0.89, Total- 0.77
Black Smoke: Winter- 0.65, Spring- 0.67,
Summer- 0.91, Fall- 0.88, Total- 0.79
Zn: Winter- 0.58, Spring- 0.75, Summer-
0.66, Fall- 0.75, Total- 0.68
Fe: Winter- 0.52, Spring- 0.96, Summer-
0.90, Fall- 0.95, Total- 0.83
K: Winter- 0.95, Spring- 1.05, Summer-
1.01, Fall- 1.08, Total- 1.05
CI: Winter- 1.01, Spring- 1.24, Summer-
1.37, Fall- 1.74, Total- 1.24
Al: Winter- 1.19, Spring- 1.08, Summer-
1.41, Fall- 2.20, Total-1.27
Li et al. (2003, 047845)
Objective: T0 establish effects of
evaporative coolers on indoor PM
concentrations.
Methods: Concurrent 10min avg indoor
and outdoor concentrations recorded for
2 days.I/O determined by equation based
on mass conversation principles.
Subjects: 10 homes with evaporative
coolers. El Paso, TX. June 22-Aug. 23,
2001.
n/a
PMio- All: 0.60, Cooler On: 0.57, Cooler
Off: 0.66
PM2.b- All: 0.65, Cooler On: 0.63, Cooler
Off: 0.73
Lunden et al. (2008,155949)
Objective: To investigate the
physiochemical processes that influence
the transport and fate of outdoor
particles to the indoor environment.
Methods: I/O calculated from
measurements of aerosols collected on
quartz filters.
Subjects: 3-bedroom single-story
unoccupied house in Clovis, CA. 3
periods: Oct. 9-23, 2000; Dec. 1-19,
2000; Jan. 12-23,2001.
n/a
PM2.6: Oct.- 0.46 ± 0.2, Dec.- 0.39 ±
0.2, Jan.- 0.38 ± 0.3, All periods- 0.41
± 0.2
Carbon: Oct.- 0.50 ± 0.1, Dec.- 0.46 ±
0.1, Jan.- 0.52 ± 0.2, All periods- 0.50
± 0.2
OC: Oct.- 0.48 ± 0.1, Dec.- 0.44 ± 0.1,
Jan.- 0.50 ± 0.2, All periods- 0.47 ± 0.2
Black carbon: Oct.- 0.60 ± 0.2, Dec.-
0.60 ± 0.2, Jan.- 0.65 ± 0.2, All
periods- 0.61 ± 0.2
Macintosh et al. (2009,190887)
Objective: T0 estimate the potential for
residential air cleaning systems to
mitigate exposure to fine particles of
ambient origin.
Methods: Multi-zone indoor air quality
model to examine annual, 24h avg and
diurnal concentrations of outdoor PM2.6 in
residential indoor air.
Subjects: Homes in Cincinnati,
Cleveland, and Columbus, OH that have
natural ventilation, forced air heating and
cooling with conventional in-duct
filtration, or forces air heating and
cooling with high-efficiency in-duct air
cleaning. 2005.
n/a
PM2.6 (range): Natural ventilation- 0.23-
0.97; Forced air - conventional filtration-
0.13-0.94; Forced air - high-efficiency
electrostatic- 0.02-0.80
July 2009
A-323
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Study Design
Finf
Martuzevicius et al. (2008,190886)
Objective: To determine the contribution
of traffic-related PM to the indoor
aerosols.
Methods: Receptor modeling based on a
PARAFAC model.
Subjects: 6 houses 30-300m from a
highway, with conventional windows,
central HVAC, and with smoking and
cooking allowed. Spring: Mar. 30-May
14, 2004. Fall: Sept. 13-0ct. 22, 2004.
Cincinnati, OH.
n/a
¦ PM2.6: Spring- 0.5 ± 0.2 - 2.9 ±
1.2; Fall- 0.7 ± 0.1 -4.7 ± 6.9
EC: Spring-0.3 ± 0.1 -2.2 ± 1.7:
Winter- 0.6 ± 0.1 - 1.3 ± 0.7
OC: Spring-1.0 ± 0.7 - 6.9 ± 3.9:
Winter- 1.2 ± 0.1 - 7.6 ± 10
Si: Spring- 0.4 ± 0.1 - 5.1 ± 3.9:
Winter- 0.5 ± 0.1 - 5.3 ± 4.5
S: Spring- 0.4 ± 0.1 - 0.7 ± 0.1: Winter-
0.5 ± 0.1 - 0.9 ± 0.4
Mn: Spring- 0.3 ± 0.2 - 0.8 ± 0.6:
Winter- 0.3 ± 0.2- 1.0 ± 0.2
Fe: Spring- 0.3 ± 0.0 - 1.3 ± 0.8:
Winter- 0.4 ± 0.1 - 0.9 ± 0.6
Zn: Spring- 0.3 ± 0.1 - 0.7 ± 0.6:
Winter- 0.6 ± 0.1 - 1.1 ± 0.8
Br: Spring- 0.3 ±0.1 -1.0 ± 0.5:
Winter- 0.2 ± 0.1 - 0.9 ± 0.6
Pb: Spring- 0.3 ± 0.3 - 0.9 ± 0.6:
Winter- 0.2 ± 0.2- 1.9 ± 2.3
Meng et al. (2005, 058595)
Objective: Analyses of RIOPA data,
which investigated relationships between
indoor, outdoor, and personal exposure
for several air pollutants.
Methods: PM measured on Teflon filters
collected by PEMs for 48h. The mass
balance model and RCS statistical model
used to estimate indoor and and personal
PM concentrations.
Subjects: 212 nonsmoking homes
sampled. Houston, TX: Los Angeles
County, CA: Elizabeth, NJ. Summer
1999-spring 2001, all 4 seasons.
PM2.5- 0.46
Los Angeles: PM2.b- Mean: 0.84, Median:
0.90:
EC- Mean: 0.93, Median: 0.92:
OC- Mean: 1.32, Median: 1.31
Elizabeth: PM2.b- Mean: 0.99, Median:
0.86:
EC- Mean: 1.0, Median: 0.85:
OC- Mean: 2.4, Median: 1.8
Houston: PM2.b- Mean: 1.16, Median:
1.02:
EC- Mean: 1.0, Median: 0.71:
OC- Mean: 2.25, Median: 2.35
Molnar et al. (2007,156774) Objective: To characterize and compare
indoor and outdoor PM2.6 trace element
concentrations in difference
microenvironments related to children.
Methods: Elemental concentrations
analyzed using X-ray fluorescence
spectroscopy.
Subjects: 40 sampling sites (10
classrooms in 5 schools, 10 preschools,
20 non-smoking homes). 3 communities in
Stockholm, Sweden. Sampled once during
spring and once during winter. Dec. 1,
2003-July 1,2004.
PM2.E (containing sulfur or lead): 0.4-0.9 Sulfur (median): Both seasons- 0.61
(homes), 0.53 (schools), 0.69
(preschools):
Winter- 0.47 (homes), 0.36 (schools),
0.63 (preschools):
Spring- 0.63 (homes), 0.55 (schools),
0.90 (preschools)
Lead (median): Both seasons- 0.70
(homes), 0.59 (schools), 0.70
(preschools):
Winter- 0.62 (homes), 0.43 (schools),
0.63 (preschools):
Spring- 0.70 (homes), 0.64 (schools),
0.75 (preschools)
July 2009
A-324
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Study Design
Finf
Nn et al. (2005,155996)
Objective: To estimate PM exposures
following the September 11, 2001 attack
in NYC.
Methods: Outdoor PM2.6 interpolated and
used in a deterministic micro-
environmental model (INTAIR) to simulate
analytically concentrations in indoor
micro-environments. Linear regression
equations used.
Subjects: Lower Manhattan residents
divided into representative individuals -
home-maker, office/shop-worker,
student/child. Estimates Sept. 14-31.
n/a
Mean I/O in home simulated with INTAIR-
No Source: 0.6, Smoking: 1.9, Cooking:
1.3, Smoking and Cooking: 2.3:
I/O of micro-environments simulated by
analytical and empirical methods (no
indoor source)- Office/Shop: 0.4,
Classroom: 0.9, Transport Area: 1.9,
Store: 1.2
Paschold et al. (2003,156847) Objective: To identify PM sources inside
homes with evaporative coolers.
Methods: PM element composition
analysis by ICP-MS.
Subjects: 10 residences. El Paso, TX.
Summer 2001.
n/a PMio: Na- 0.33, Mg- 0.43, Al- 0.50, K-
0.48, Ca- 0.40, Ti- 0.52, Mn- 0.48, Fe-
0.46, Cu- 0.74, Zn- 0.52, Ba- 0.54, Pb-
0.76
PM2.b: Na- 0.20, Mg- 0.29, Al- 0.34, K-
0.30, Ca- 0.52, Ti- 0.40, Mn- 0.35, Fe-
0.30, Cu- 0.67, Zn- 0.34, Ba- 0.47, Pb-
0.51
Polidori et al. (2007,156877) Objective: To investigate the PM2.6: July 6-Aug. 20- 0.71 ±0.10: Aug. Only l/O's n1 considered
relationships of indoor and outdoor PM2.6, 24-0ct. 15- 0.60 ± 0.05: Oct. 19-Dec.
its components, seasonal variations, and 10- 0.59 ± 0.07: Jan. 4-Feb. 18- 0.45 ±
gaseous copollutants. 0.06
Methods: Finf estimated by analysis of OC: July 6-Aug. 20- 0.86 ± 0.05: Aug.
I/O's and a recursive model technique. 24 0ct. 15- 0.77 ± 0.09: Oct. 19-Dec.
Subjects: 2 retirement facilities in Los
Angeles, CA. July 6-Aug. 20, 2005. Aug.
24-Oct. 15, 2005. Oct. 19-Dec. 10, EC: July 6-Aug. 20- 0.73 ± 0.07: Aug.
2005. Jan. 4-Feb. 18, 2006. 24-0ct. 15- 0.71 ± 0.05: Oct. 19-Dec.
10-0.82 ± 0.07: Jan. 4-Feb. 18- 0.64 ±
0.10
10-0.77 ± 0.06; Jan. 4-Feb. 18- 0.64 ±
0.10
Ramachandran et al. (2003,188454) Objective: T0 examine variability in
measurements of 24h avg and 15min avg
PM2.6 concentrations.
Methods: Linear regression of
gravimetric measurements.
n/a 24h avg: Mean-1.7, Median-1.3,
Standard deviation- 1.6
15min avg: Mean- 2.7, Median- 1.2,
Standard deviation- 8.7
Subjects: 3 urban residential
neighborhoods in Minneaopolis-St. Paul,
MN. 9-10 nonsmoking residences. Spring
(April 26-June 2), summer (June 20-Aug.
10), fall (Sept. 23-Nov. 20) of 1999.
Rojas-Bracho et al. (2004, 054772) Objective: T0 examine determinants of
personal exposure to PM2.6, PM10, PM2.b-
10.
Methods: 2 sets of mixed models.
Personal exposures modeled as dependent
variables. Subject variability modeled
using random effects. Explanatory
variables and season modeled as fixed
effects.
n/a PM2.6: Winter- Mean: 1.58, Median: 2.11;
Summer- Mean: 1.08, Median: 0.88
PM10: Winter- Mean: 2.02, Median: 3.77;
Summer-Mean: 1.14, Median: 1.05
PM2.B-10: Winter- Mean: 2.65, Median:
3.59; Summer- Mean: 1.26, Median: 1.39
Subjects: 18 COPD subjects in
nonsmoking households. Boston, MA.
Winters of 1996 and 1997, summer of
1996.
July 2009
A-325
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Study Design
Finf
Sarnat et al. (2006, 089166)
Objective: To assess the ability of
outdoor PM2.E, its volatile and nonvolatile
components and particle sizes to infiltrate
indoors.
Methods: PM2.Bmass contributions
estimated by the mean concentration
ratio between each component and PM2.B.
Indoor and outdoor particle
concentrations relationships examined by
Spearman correlation coefficient. I/O
concentration ratios used during
overnight (nonsource) period to estimate
fraction of ambient particles remaining
airborne indoors (Finf).
Subjects: 17 occupied, nonsmoking Los
Angeles, CA residences. July 28, 2001 -
Feb. 25, 2002.
PM2.6: Median- 0.48, Interquartile range-
0.39-0.57
BC: Median- 0.84, Interquartile range-
0.70-0.96
UFP (0.02-0.03 |jm): Median- 0.50,
Interquartile range- 0.39-0.60
UFP (0.08-0.3 |jm): Median- -0.75
Coarse particles (5-10 Mm): Median-
<0.17
PM2.6: Overnight- 0.40-0.57, Morning-
0.43-0.74, Afternoon- 0.45-0.90,
Evening- 0.42-0.82
BC: Overnight- 0.70-0.97, Morning- 0.67-
0.98, Afternoon- 0.77-1.04, Evening-
0.70-1.01
Stranger et al. (2008,190884)
Objective: To assess indoor air quality
by determining indoor and outdoor PM2.B
mass concentrations, elemental
composition, and gaseous compounds.
Methods: PM mass concentrations
determined gravimetrically.
Subjects: 27 primary schools in city
center and suburbs of Antwerp, Belgium.
Dec. 2002 and June 2003.
n/a
PM2.6: Urban- Range: 0.3-6.9, Average:
1.3: Suburban- Range: 0.2-8.8, Average:
2.3
V, Ni, Zn, Pb, Br, Mn: < 1
CI, Ca, Al, Si, K, Ti, Fe: >1
Black smoke: Urban- Average: Dec.- 0.7
± 0.1, June- 1.1 ± 0.3: Suburban: Dec.-
0.8 ± 0.2, June-1.0 ± 0.4
Stranger et al. (2009,190883)
Objective: To assess indoor air quality in
residences by quantifying various
gaseous pollutants, and PM mass
concentrations, elemental composition,
and water-soluble ionic content.
Methods: PM mass concentrations
gravimetrically determined. Elemental
bulk analysis on filters.
Subjects: 19 residential homes in
Antwerp, Belgium that were a subset of
participants in the ECRHS II study.
n/a
PMi: Houses 1-15- Average: 2.0, Range:
0.3-9.6; Smokers: Average- 3.9, Range-
1.2-9.7; Non-smokers: Average: 0.8,
Range- 0.3-14
PM2.6: Houses 1-15- Average: 1.5, Range:
0.4-5.4, Smokers average: 2.5, Smokers
range: 1.2-5.4, Non-smokers average:
0.8, Non-smokers range: 0.4-1.3; Houses
16-19- Average: 2.6, Range: 0.3-3.9
PM10: Houses 1-15- Average: 1.3, Range:
0.4-4.1, Smokers average: 2.1, Smokers
range: 1.1-4.1, Non-smokers average:
0.8, Non-smokers range: 0.4-1.2
Ca, Ti, V,Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Zn, Pb, Si, S, CI:
<1
K, Cu, Br, Al: >1
Turpin et al. (2007,157062)
Objective: To characterize and compare
outdoor, indoor, personal PM2.6 exposure.
Identify indoor and personal PM2.B
sources. Estimate outdoor PM2.6 effect on
indoor and personal PM2.B. RIOPA study.
Methods: Fm calculated in three ways:
RCS model used to obtain constant Finf.
Mass balance model shows Finf varying
with AER. Robust regression uses major
PM2.6 species for home-specific Finf.
Subjects: 309 nonsmoking adults and
118 children with no preexisting
conditions. 219 homes sampled. Elizabeth
NJ, Houston TX, and Los Angeles County
CA.
PM2.b- RCS model: 0.46; Least-Trimmed
Squared Regression- Mean: 0.69, Median-
0.70, SD: 0.23; Mass Balance Model-
-0.08--0.85
Los Angeles: PM2.b- Mean: 0.84, Median:
0.90;
EC- Mean: 0.93, Median: 0.92;
0C- Mean: 1.32, Median: 1.31
Elizabeth: PM2.b- Mean: 0.99, Median:
0.86;
EC- Mean: 1.0, Median: 0.85;
0C- Mean: 2.4, Median: 1.8
Houston: PM2.b- Mean: 1.16, Median:
1.02;
EC- Mean: 1.0, Median: 0.71;
0C- Mean: 2.25, Median: 2.35
July 2009
A-326
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Study Design
Finf
I/O
Wallace and Williams (2005, 057485)
Williams et al. (2003, 053338)
Williams et al. (2008,191201)
Wilson and Brauer (2006, 088933)
Wu et al. (2006,179950)
Objective: To estimate the contribution
of outdoor PM2.E to personal exposure in
high-risk subpopulations.
Methods: Longitudinal regressions of
estimated indoor and outdoor PM2.6for
Finf.
Subjects: 29 African-Americans with
hypertension and 8 with implanted
cardiac defibrillators. Measured
7d/season, 4 seasons in 2000-2001.
Raleigh, NC.
Objective: To estimate ambient PM2.6
contributions to personal and indoor
residential PM mass concentrations.
Methods: Fm estimated from least
squares, regression analysis, and mixed
model slope.
Subjects: Nonsmoking, ambulatory, a
50yrs. 2 cohorts: mostly Caucasian with
implanted cardiac defibrillators in Chapel,
NC; 30 African-Americans with controlled
hypertension in low-to-moderate SES
neighborhoods in Raleigh, NC. 7d/season,
4 seasons in 2000-2001.
Objective: To examine the spatial
variability of PM2.6 and PM10-2.B and their
components to determine the suitability
of conducting health outcome studies
using a central site monitor in a
metropolitan area having multiple source
impacts.
Methods: Gravimetric analysis of PM
mass concentrations. ED-XRF analysis of
PM elements.
Subjects: Non-smoking, ambulatory, and
living in detached homes and non-smoking
households. Detroit, Ml.
Objective: To provide additional insight
into factors affecting exposure to
airborne PM and the resultant health
effects.
Methods: Fm estimated by mass balance
equation.
Subjects: 16 nonsmoking subjects with
COPD. 54-86yrs. Vancouver, British
Columbia. April-Sept. 1998.
Objective: To assess personal PM2.6
exposures from ambient sources and
agriculture burning smoke.
Methods: Fnfestimated by RCS model.
Application of Robust regression
algorithm.
Subjects: 33 adult asthmatics. 18-
52yrs. Pullman, WA. Sept. 3, 2002-Nov.
1,2002.
Range: 0.35-0.87
Regression analysis: 0.43 ± 0.06
Mixed model slope: Mean- 0.45 ± 0.21,
Range- 0.05-0.94
PM2.6: Range- 0.16-6.45, Mean- 0.7 ±
0.33, Median- 0.70 (indicate indoor sulfur
source when Finf > 1)
Sulfate: 0.72
Range: 0.25-0.94
PM2.6: Mean- 1.08 ± 1.05, Median- 0.75,
Range- 0.24-9.48
Sulfur: Mean- 0.59 ± 0.16, Median-
0.58, Range- 0.17-1.06
n/a
n/a
Least squares estimate of indoor filtration n/a
factors: Mean- 0.42 ± 0.38, Range- ¦
0.55 to 1.62
July 2009
A-327
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Study Design
Finf
Yang et al. (2009,190885)
Objective: To characterize the
concentrations of different indoor air
pollutants.
Methods: PMio collected on pall flex
membrane filer using MiniVol portable air
samplers. Arithmetic and geometric
means calculated for indoor
concentrations. Differences in
concentrations measured by Kruskal-
Wallis test.
Subjects: 55 schools in 6 metropolitan
areas in Korea. Samples from a
classroom, laboratory, and computer
classroom. 3 seasons, July-Dec. 2004.
n/a
PMio: Classroom- Summer: 1.98,
Autumn: 2.25, Winter: 2.07, Total: 2.06
Laboratory- Summer: 1.33, Autumn:
1.32, Winter: 1.72, Total: 1.46
Computer classroom: Summer- 0.77,
Autumn: 1.43, Winter: 2.08, Total: 1.43
Zhao and Hopke (2004,100956) Objective: To characterize airborne n/a n/a
particle sources that are common to
personal, residential indoor, residential
outdoor, and ambient environments. To
study relationships between PM2.6
exposure and emission sources.
Methods: Expanded receptor model.
Subjects: Nonsmoking, ambulatory,
£50yrs. 2 cohorts: mostly Caucasian
with implanted cardiac defibrillators in
Chapel, NC; 30 African-Americans with
controlled hypertension in low-to-
moderate SES neighborhoods in Raleigh,
NC. 7d/season, 4 seasons in 2000-2001.
Zhu et al. (2005,190081) Objective: T0 determine penetration
behavior of outdoor ultrafine particles
into indoor environments in areas close to
freeways.
Methods: Dynamic mass balance model.
Subjects: 4 2-bedroom apartments
within 60m from the center of the 405
Freeway in Los Angeles, CA. Non-
smoking tenants. 2 sampling periods (non-
cooking, non-cleaning): Oct.-Dec. 2003
and Dec. 2003-Jan. 2004.
n/a Highest (largest ultrafine particles- 70-
100nm): 0.6-0.9
Lowest (smallest ultrafine particles-10-
20nm): 0.1-0.4
1. I/O estimated from Figure 8 in study.
2. I/O calculated from indoor and outdoor concentrations in Table 1 in study.
3. Fint measured by coefficient of determination, R2.
4. RIOPA calculated l/O's.
5. I/O calculated from mean and median indoor and outdoor concentrations listed in Table 1 of study.
6.1/O's estimated from Figure 3 in study.
7. Mean and median I/O concentrations calculated from all residences in study.
8. Fint estimated from Figure 2 in study.
9. Fm presented in box plot (Figure 8), however data is difficult to deduce. No numeric values reported.
July 2009
A-328
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table A-55. Summary of PM - copollutant exposure studies.
Reference
PM metric
Copollutant metric
Association between PM
and copollutant
Primary findings
Fruin etal. (2008,097183)
In-vehicle UFP, BC, PM-bound
PAH
In-vehicle NOx, CO
R UFP PM2.6 NO BC
CO CO?
UFP 1 0.71 0.97 0.95 0.63
0.72
PM2.6 1 0.69 0.89
0.66 0.68
NO 1 0.91 0.78
0.85
BC 1 0.65
0.74
CO 1
0.94
CO?
1
Note that these correlations are
computed from data presented
by Fruin et al. (2008, 097183)
for mean concentrations at
different loc ations.
Measurements of freeway UFP,
BC, PM-bound PAH, and NO
concentrations were roughly one
order of magnitude higher than
ambient measurements. Multiple
regression analysis suggests
these concentrations were a
function of truck density and
total truck count.
Schwartz et al. (2007, 090220)
Ambient and personal PM2.6 data
from the Baltimore panel study
Ambient and personal O3 and
NO2 data from the Baltimore
panel study.
Median fB for regressions:
Ambient PM2.6 Ambient O3
Ambient NO2
Personal PM2.B 0.0143
0.0016 0.0115
Personal PM2.6 of ambient origin
0.0183 -0.0037
0.0124
Personal S042~ 0.0051
0.0035 0.0006
Results suggest that ambient O3
exposure may be related to
personal SO42' exposure but not
to personal PM2.6 exposure on
the whole. Ambient NO2
exposure was associated with
personal PM2.6 exposure,
possibly because both have
traffic sources.
Personal O3 0.0014
0.0010 0.0009
Personal NO2 0.0015
0.0009 0.0010
July 2009
A-329
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
PM metric
Copollutant metric
Association between PM
and copollutant
Primary findings
Tolbert et al. (2007,090316)
Ambient PMio, PMio-2.5, PM2.6,
EC, 0C, TC, SO42', water-soluble
metals, oxygenated
hydrocarbons
Ambient O3, NO2, CO, SO2
PMm03
PMc PM2.
NO2
5
CO
SO2
PM10I.O
Os 0.6
1.0
NO2 0.5
0.4
1.0
CO 0.5
0.3
0.7
1.0
SO2 0.2
0.2
0.4
0.3
1.0
PMc 0.7
1.0
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.2
PM2.6
0.2
0.8
0.5
0.6
1.0
0.6
0.4
S042 0.7
0.3
0.6
0.8
0.1
0.1
0.1
EC 0.6
0.5
0.4
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.2
OC 0.7
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.2
TC 0.7
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.2
Metals
0.1
0.7
0.5
0.4
0.7
0.3
0.4
OHC 0.5
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.2
0.3
0.1
Low correlations were seen
between SO2 and PM
constituents. Components were
used in a multi-pollutant model to
predict emergency department
visits in Atlanta. CO was found
to be the most significant
predictor of cardiovascular
disease visits in one-, two-, and
three-pollutant models, and O3
was the most significant
predictor of respiratory disease
visits in one-, two-, and three-
pollutant models.
S042 EC OC TC
Metals OHC
SO421.0
EC 0.3 1.0
OC 0.3 0.8 1.0
TC 0.3 0.9 1.0 1.0
Metals 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.5
1.0
OHC 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5
1.0
July 2009
A-330
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
PM metric
Copollutant metric
Association between PM
and copollutant
Primary findings
Brook et al. (2007, 091153)
Anbient PMio, PMio-2.5, PM2.6,
SO42', and trace metals in 10
Canadian cities.
Ambient NO2, NO
R with NO2 (min, Max)
NO? 1.00(1.00,1.00)
NO 0.67(0.51,0.77)
PM2.6 0.54(0.45,0.71)
PMio-2.5 0.31 (0.04, 0.50)
PMio0.50 (0.23, 0.70)
SO42- 0.33(0.10,0.48)
Fe
Zn
Ni
Mn
As
Al
Cu
Pb
Si
Se
0.44 (0.29, 0.56)
0.39 (0.28, 0.52)
0.20 (0.06, 0.40)
0.51 (0.37, 0.62)
0.21 (0.07, 0.39)
0.07 (-0.17, 0.18)
0.03 (-0.07, 0.15)
0.28(0.16, 0.39)
0.19(0.00, 0.32)
0.14 (-0.04, 0.35)
NO2 showed the strongest
association with mortality, but it
is unclear if this association is
due to health effects of NO2 or
health effects of copollutant PM.
Ito et al. (2007,156594)
Ambient PM2.6
Ambient O3, NO2, SO2, CO
Shown in figure format only.
Authors tested relationship
between meteorological
variables and copollutants to
determine if multi-pollutant
models are impacted by spatial
or temporal variation or by
meteorological conditions.
Multicollinearity varied by
pollutant and season.
Kaur et al. (2005, 086504)
Fixed-site and personal PM2.6,
personal UFP
Fixed site and personal CO
Personal R:
PM2.6
UFP
CO
PM2.
5 1
0.5
0.2
UFP
0.5 1
0.7
CO
0.2 0.7
1
Fairly low correlation was
observed between PM2.6 and CO
and between PM2.6 and UFP,
stronger correlations between
UFP and CO.
Kauretal. (2005,088175)
Fixed-site and personal PM2.6
analyzed post-sample for light
absorbance (as indicator for
carbonaceous aerosol), personal
UFP
Fixed site and personal CO
Personal R:
R
PM2.!
Abs
CO
UFP
PM2J
5
1
0.3
¦0.1
0.0
Abs
0.3
1
0.2
0.7
CO
¦0.1
0.2
1
0.1
UFP
0.0
0.7
0.1
1
Strongest correlation observed
between UFP and absorption,
which is reasonable given that
much absorptive carbonaceous
aerosol is in the ultrafine range.
Sorenson et al. (2005, 089428)
Personal, indoor residential, and
outdoor residential PM2.6 and BC
Personal, indoor residential, and
outdoor residential NO2
Personal exposure regression
coefficients to:
PM2.6 BC NO2
Bedroom 0.72 0.47 0.70
Front door0.46 0.61 0.60
Background 0.29 0.03 0.56
Personal NO2 concentration is
more strongly influenced by
background than PM2.6 or BC.
Sabin et al. (2005, 087728)
BC, particle-bound PAH on a
school bus.
NO2 on a school bus.
BC PB-PAH NO2
BC 1 0.94 0.49
PB-PAH 1 0.37
NO2 1
Note that these correlations are
computed from data presented
by Sabin et al. for mean
concentrations when the test
bus travelled behind different
vehicles.
Less correlation was observed
between NO2 and PM species.
This study was aimed more at
fuel choices and control
technologies for children's
exposures on school buses.
July 2009
A-331
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
pollutants shown.
„ Association between PM „ .
Reference PM metric Copollutant metric , . Primary findings
and copollutant ' _
Lai et al. (2004, 0568111 Microenvironmental and personal Microenvironmental and personal R PM2.6 TVOC NO2 The EXPOLIS Oxford study was
PM2.6 and trace elements VOCs, NO2, and CO. j^qq g 21 more focused on the indoor-
outdoor exposure relationship,
"¦21 but the correlation results
0.41 showed no important
0 22 relationships between the
NO2 -0.1
¦0.02
¦0.16
0.09-0.11
¦0.01
¦0.23
0.03
CO 0.07
0.07
0.3
Correlation coefficients listed (in
order) for personal exposure,
residential indoor, residential
outdoor, and workplace indoor.
Morning and evening
measurements of PM2.6 were on
avg higher and more variable
than for benzene and CO (in
order). Benzene and CO had
higher and more variable
concentrations for minibuses
than for buses and metros,
respectively, while PM2.6
concentrations were not
substantially different for buses
and minibuses.
Sarnat et al. (2001, 019401) Fixed site and personal PM2.6 Ambient O3, NO2, SO2, and CO R PM2.6
monitors. CO
PM2.6 1
0.15
Os -0.72
¦0.06
NO2 0.75 0.71 1
0.75
SO2 -0.17 0.41-0.17
1 -0.32
CO 0.69-0.67 0.76-0.12
1
Gomez-Perales et al. (2007,
138816; 2004, 054418)
Microenvironmental PM2.6 with
S042", NOs-, EC, OC.
Microenvironmental CO.
Ratio of Cone PM2.6 CO
Benzene
Minibus/Bus 1.041.54 2.01
1.20 1.40 1.33
Minibus/Metro 1.70 2.02 3.20
1.43 3.03 3.10
O3 NO2 SO2 Strong association between
ambient NO2 and personal PM2.6
0 67 0 37 ¦ suggests that ambient gas may
be a suitable surrogate for
personal exposure.
July 2009
A-332
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table A-56. Summary of studies relating PM, SES, and mortality and/or morbidity.
Reference
Population Studied
Data
interval
Metrics Used
(health; pollutant; SES
variable)
Study Outcome
Bateson and
Schwartz (2004,
086244)
Residents (>65) of Cook
Co. IL with prior cardiac or
respiratory hospitalization,
1988-1991
Days
All-cause mortality; PM10; median
household income, % with bachelor's
degree, % not speaking English at
home
No significant change in mortality with a 10 |jg|m3 increase in PM10
with SES variables.
Cifuentes et al.
(2000,010351)
Residents (aged 25-64) of
Santiago, Chile, 1988-1996
Days
Non-trauma mortality; PM2.6;
educational level
Relative risks of non-trauma mortality were at or near significance in
the group having only elementary education.
Filleul et al.
(2003, 087403)
Residents (aged >65) of
Bordeaux, France, 1988-
1997
Days
Non-trauma mortality; BC (10th or
90th percentile levels); education
level, previous occupation (domestic,
skilled, intellectual)
No significant effect between BC and non-trauma mortality was
observed for either SES variable.
Filleul et al.
(2004, 087404)
Residents (aged >65) of
Bordeaux, France, 1988-
1997
Days
Non-trauma mortality, cardio-
respiratory mortality; BC;
educational level, previous
occupation (never worked, white-
collar, blue collar)
Blue collar SES group had a significant odds ratio of non-trauma
mortality; high education level had a significant odds ratio for cardio-
respiratory mortality.
Filluel et al.
(2005,087357)
Adults (aged 25-59 at
enrollment) in 7 French
cities, 1974-2000
Years
Non-trauma mortality; BC, TSP;
educational level
No trend as a function of education level.
Finkelstein et al.
(2003, 056117)
Adults (aged >40) in
Hamilton-Burlington,
Canada, 1992-2001
Years
Non-trauma mortality; TSP; mean
household income
Significantly higher relative risk as a function of TSP exposure for
low and high income strata
Finkelstein et al.
(2003, 056117)
Adults (aged >40) in
Hamilton-Burlington,
Canada, 1992-2001
Years
Cardio-vascular mortality; Pollution
index (TSP and SO2) (regional, urban,
near-road), traffic proximity;
deprivation index
No significant relative risk as a function of pollution index or traffic
proximity.
Gouveia 81
Fletcher (2000,
012132)
Residents (aged >65) of
Sao Paulo, Brazil, 1991-
1993
Days
Non-trauma mortality; PM10;
composite SES index
Non-significant results show relative risk of non-trauma mortality as
a function of PM10 slightly higher in advantaged neighborhoods.
Gwynn &
Thurston (2001,
017206)
Residents of NY City, 1988-
1990
Days
Respiratory hospital admissions;
PM10, sulfate; race, insurance
Higher but non-significant relative risk for non-whites than whites
but neither with relative risk significantly different from 1 for PM10;
relative risk significantly higher than 1 for sulfate among non-whites.
Hoel et al. (2002,
042364)
Adults (aged 55-69 at
enrollment) in The
Netherlands, 1992-2000
Years
Non-trauma mortality; BC (regional,
urban, near-road); educational level
No significant difference in relative risk as a function of BC exposure
for education level
Ito and Thurston
(1996, 078841)
Residents of Cook County,
IL, 1985-1990
Days
Mortality; PM10; race, sex
Mortality increased with PM10, effects of sex and race were noted
with black females > white females > black males > white males
Krewski et al.
(2000,012281)
Adults (aged 25-74 at
enrollment) in Six Cities
cohort, 1974-1991
Years
Non-trauma mortality, cardio-
pulmonary mortality; PM2.6, sulfates;
educational level
Relative risk significantly greater than 1 for non-trauma mortality
among those with less than high school education caused by
increased PM2.6 and sulfate exposures
Krewskietal. Adults (aged >30 at
(2000, 012281) enrollment) in American
Cancer Society cohort,
follow-up 1982-1989
Years Non-trauma mortality, cardio-
pulmonary mortality; PM2.6, sulfates;
educational level
Relative risk significantly greater than 1 for non-trauma and cardio-
pulmonary mortality as a function of PM2.6 exposure for less than
high school and high school education; relative risk significantly
greater than 1 for non-trauma and cardio pulmonary mortality as a
function of sulfate exposure for less than high school education.
Lee et al. (2006, Children (aged < 15) in Days Hospitalized for asthma; PM10; SES
098248) Seoul, Korea, 2002 (listed as "high," "medium," or "low"
of monitor site without explanation
of criteria)
PM10 level does not vary linearly with increasing SES. Relative risk
significantly greater than 1 for high and low SES.
July 2009
A-333
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Population Studied
Data
interval
Metrics Used
(health; pollutant; SES
variable)
Study Outcome
Linn et al. (1999,
011680)
Residents of South Coast
Air Basin, CA, 1992-1995
Days
Respiratory and cardiovascular
hospital admissions; PMio; sex,
ethnicity (white, black, Hispanic,
other)
Impact of PMio on cardiovascular effects increased in blacks and
whites relative to Hispanics and others.
Martins et al.
(2004, 087457)
Residents (aged >60) of
six zones of Sao Paulo,
Brazil, 1997-1999
Days
Respiratory mortality; PMio; % with
college education, % families with
monthly income > $3500, % living
in slums
% with college education and % families with monthly income
> $3500 have negative impact of effect of PMio on respiratory
mortality, % people living in slums had positive effect.
Norris et al.
(2000, 087104)
Children (aged < 18) in
Seattle, WA, 1995-1996
Days
Emergency room visits for asthma;
PMio; high vs. low emergency room
use
Relationship between PMio and emergency room visits not
significantly impacted by overall emergency room use.
O'Neill et al.
(O'Neill et al.,
2004, 055597)
Residents (aged >65) of
Mexico City, Mexico, 1996-
1998
Days
Non-trauma mortality; PMio and O3;
% homes with electricity, % homes
with piped water, % literacy, %
indigenous language speakers
PMio not associated with non-trauma mortality (but significant
associations for O3).
Ou et al. (2008,
189955)
Residents (aged >30) of
Hong Kong, 1998
Days
Non-trauma mortality; PMio; housing
type, occupational level, education
level
Housing type and blue-collar caused significantly greater impact of
PMio on mortality compared with single family housing or white-
collar and never employed, respectively.
Pope et al.
(2002, 024689)
Adults (aged >30 at
enrollment) in American
Cancer Society cohort,
follow-up 1982-1989
Years
Mortality; PM2.6; education level
Non-trauma mortality increased with PM2.6 increase; greatest impact
among those with less than high school education.
Romieu (2004,
093074)
Children (1 mo. - 1 yr.) in
Ciudad Juarez, Mexico,
1997-2001
Days
Total mortality, respiratory
mortality; PMio; composite SES
index
No significant association between pollutants and total mortality;
significant odds ratio for respiratory mortality and PMio for lowest
SES; nearly significant association between SES and PMio
Samet et al.
(2000,013132)
Residents (all ages) of 20
US cities, 1987-1994
Days
Non-trauma mortality; PMio (adj for
O3, SO2, NO2, CO); % high school
graduates, % annual income
< $12,675, % annual income
>$100,000
No significant association between PMio-related non-trauma
mortality and SES variables.
Schwartz (2000,
002470)
Residents (all ages) of 10
US cities, 1986-1993
Days
Non-trauma mortality; PMio;
unemployment rate, % below
poverty level; % with college degree
No significant difference in the effect of poverty, college degree, or
unemployment rate on the influence of PM on mortality, but
unemployment rate effect slightly higher.
Tolbert et al.
(2000, 001993)
Children (aged < 16) in
Atlanta, GA, 1993-1995
Days
Emergency room visits for asthma;
PMio; race, Medicaid status, sex
Impact of PMio on asthma emergency room visits was not impacted
by any SES variable.
Villeneuve et al.
(2003, 055051)
Residents (aged >65) of
Vancouver, Canada, 1986-
1999
Days
Non-trauma mortality; TSP, PMio,
and PM2.E; mean family income
Significantly higher non-trauma mortality as a function of TSP for
high and low income.
Wheeler & Ben-
Schlomo (2005,
089860)
Respondents to Health
Survey of England, 1995-
1997
n/a
Decreased lung function, asthma
prevalence; air quality index based
on PMio, NO2, SO2, benzene; social
class, sex
In urban areas, lower SES significantly associated with poor air
quality; in rural areas, higher SES significantly associated with poor
air quality. Lower SES was shown to impact the relationship
between PMio and lung function among men but not women.
Wilson et al.
(2007,157149)
Residents (all ages) of
Phoenix, AZ, 1995-1997
Days; lag 0-
5, 6-day
moving avg
Non-trauma mortality,
cardiovascular mortality; PM2.6,
PMio-2.5; % < HS diploma, % below
poverty level, location within city
The lower SES region of Central Phoenix had higher risk of mortality
as a function of PM2.6 exposure. Modification of the effect of PMio-
2.5 on mortality was observed for the higher SES region.
Wojtyniak et al.
(2001,090372)
Residents (aged 0-70 or
>70) of Cracow, Lodz,
Poznan, and Wrockrw
(Poland), 1990-1996
Days
Non-trauma and cardiovascular
mortality; BC; educational level
Non-trauma and cardiovascular mortality was significantly
associated with BC for those with less than secondary education.
July 2009
A-334
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Population Studied
Data
interval
Metrics Used
(health; pollutant; SES
variable)
Study Outcome
Wong et al.
(2008,157151)
Residents of 209 tertiary
planning units (smallest
classification for a town),
1996-2002
Days
Non-trauma and cardiovascular
mortality; PMio; social deprivation
index
Significant associations between PMio and non-trauma and
cardiovascular mortality for medium and high social deprivation
index.
Zanobetti et al.
(2000,011979)
Residents of 10 US cities,
1985-1994
Days
Respiratory and cardiovascular
hospital admissions; PMio; %
poverty, % non-white
No significant effect of SES factors on relationship between hospital
admissions and PMio.
Zanobetti et al.
(2000,012187)
Medicare recipients in Cook
County, IL, 1985-1994
Days
Respiratory and cardiovascular
hospital admissions; PMio; race, sex
No significant effect of SES factors on relationship between hospital
admissions and PMio.
Zanobetti &
Schwartz (2000,
010198)
Residents (all ages) of
Chicago, Detroit,
Minneapolis-St. Paul, and
Pittsburgh, 1986-1993
Days
Non-trauma mortality; PMio Higher but non-significant % increase in non-trauma mortality with
(excluding days when concentrations 10 jjg/m3 increase in PMio for people with less than high school
exceeded 150 jjg/m3); education education,
below or above high school
Zeka et al.
(2006, 088749)
Residents (all ages) of 20
US cities, 1989-2000
Days
Non-trauma mortality, respiratory
mortality, cardiac mortality,
mortality from infarction, mortality
from stroke; PMio; educational level
No significant relationship between increased mortality (any type)
with 10 jjg/m3 increase in PMio for any SES factors.
Some studies measured constituents other than PM; those metrics and results are not reported here.
Source: Adapted from Laurent et al. (2008,156672) and O'Neill et al. (2003, 090310).
July 2009
A-335 DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Annex A References
Abou Chakra OR; Joyeux Mi Nerriere Ei Strub MPi Zmirou-Navier D. (2007). Genotoxicity of organic extracts of
urban airborne particulate matter- an assessment within a personal exposure study. Chemosphere, 66-
1375-81. 098819
Abu-Allaban Mi Gillies JAi Gertler AWi Clayton Ri Proffitt D. (2007). Motor vehicle contributions to ambient
PM10 and PM2.5 at selected urban areas in the USA. Environ Monit Assess, 132: 155-63. 098575
Abu-Allaban Mi Rogers CFi Gertler AW. (2004). A quantitative description of vehicle exhaust particle size
distributions in a highway tunnel. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 54: 360-366. 156187
Adar SDi Adamkiewicz Gi Gold DRi Schwartz Ji Coull BAi Suh H. (2007). Ambient and microenvironmental
particles and exhaled nitric oxide before and after a group bus trip. Environ Health Perspect, 115: 507"
12. 098635
Adgate JLi Mongin SJi Pratt GCi Zhang Ji Field MPi Ramachandran Gi Sexton K. (2007). Relationships
between personal, indoor, and outdoor exposures to trace elements in PM(2.5). Sci Total Environ, 386: 21-
32.156196
Adgate JLi Ramachandran Gi Pratt GCi Waller LAi Sexton K. (2002). Spatial and temporal variability in
outdoor, indoor, and personal PM25 exposure. Atmos Environ, 36: 3255-3265. 030676
Adgate JLi Ramachandran Gi Pratt GCi Waller LAi Sexton K. (2003). Longitudinal variability in outdoor,
indoor, and personal PM25 exposure in healthy non-smoking adults. Atmos Environ, 37: 993-1002.
040341
Alander TJAi Leskinen APi Raunemaa TMi Rantanen L. (2004). Characterization of diesel particles: effects of
fuel reformulation, exhaust aftertreatment, and engine operation on particle carbon composition and
volatility. Environ Sci Technol, 38: 2707-2714. 055650
Allen JGi Webster TFi McClean MDi Stapleton HMi Nelson JW. (2007). Personal exposure to Polybrominated
Diphenyl Ethers (PBDEs) in residential indoor air. Environ Sci Technol, 41: 4574-4579. 156207
Allen Ri Larson T> Sheppard L> Wallace LLiu L-JS. (2003). Use of real-time light scattering data to estimate the
contribution of infiltrated and indoor-generated particles to indoor air. Environ Sci Technol, 37: 3484"
3492.053578
Allen R; Wallace L> Larson T> Sheppard L> Liu L-JS. (2007). Evaluation of the recursive model approach for
estimating particulate matter infiltration efficiencies using continuous light scattering data. J Expo Sci
Environ Epidemiol, 17: 468-477. 154226
Anderson TL; Ogren JA. (1998). Determining Aerosol Radiative Properties Using the TSI 3563 Integrating
Nephelometer. Aerosol Sci Technol, 29: 57"69. 156213
Andresen PR; Maynard A; Ramachandran G; Pai P. (2005). Women's personal and indoor exposures to PM2.5 in
Mysore, India: Impact of domestic fuel usage. Atmos Environ, 39: 5500-5508. 156216
Annesi-Maesano I; Moreau D; Caillaud D; Lavaud F; Le Moullec Y; Taytard A; Pauli G; Charpin D. (2007).
Residential proximity fine particles related to allergic sensitisation and asthma in primary school
children. Respir Med, 101: 1721-1729. 093180
Arhami M; Kuhn T; Fine PM; Delfino RJ; Sioutas C. (2006). Effects of Sampling Artifacts and Operating
Parameters on the Performance of a Semicontinuous Particulate Elemental Carbon/Organic Carbon
Monitor. Environ Sci Technol, 40: 945-954. 156224
Arhami M; Polidori A; Delfino RJ; Tjoa T; Sioutas C. (2009). Associations between personal, indoor, and
residential outdoor pollutant concentrations: implications for exposure assessment to size-fractionated
particulate matter. , 59: 392-404. 190096
Arnott WP; Moosmuller H; Rogers CF; Jin TJ Bruch R. (1999). Photoacoustic spectrometer for measuring light
absorption by aerosol; instrument description. Atmos Environ, 33: 2845-2852. 020650
Ashbaugh LL. (1983). A statistical trajectory technique for determining air pollution source regions. J Air Pollut
Control Assoc, 33: 1096-1098. 156229
Ashbaugh LL; Myrup LO; Flocchini RG. (1984). A principal component analysis of sulfur concentrations in the
western United States. Atmos Environ, 18: 783-791. 045148
Babich P; Wang PY; Allen G; Sioutas C; Koutrakis P. (2000). Development and Evaluation of a Continuous
Ambient PM2.5 Mass Monitor. Aerosol Sci Technol, 32: 309-324. 156239
Balakrishnan K; Sankar S; Parikh J; Padmavathi R; Srividya K; Venugopal V; Prasad S; Pandey VL. (2002).
Daily average exposures to respirable particulate matter from combustion of biomass fuels in rural
households of southern India. Environ Health Perspect, 110: 1069-1075. 156247
Balasubramanian R; Lee SS. (2007). Characteristics of indoor aerosols in residential homes in urban locations: a
case study in Singapore. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 57: 981-990. 156248
July 2009
A-336
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Barn P; Larson T> Noullett Mi Kennedy Si Copes Ri Brauer M. (2008). Infiltration of forest fire and residential
wood smoke- an evaluation of air cleaner effectiveness. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 18- 503-511.
156252
Bateson TFi Schwartz J. (2004). Who is sensitive to the effects of particulate air pollution on mortality? A case-
crossover analysis of effect modifiers. Epidemiology, 15- 143-149. 086244
Baxter LKi Clougherty JEi Laden Fi Levy JI. (2007). Predictors of concentrations of nitrogen dioxide, fine
particulate matter, and particle constituents inside of lower socioeconomic status urban homes. J Expo
Sci Environ Epidemiol, 17: 433-444. 092726
Baxter LKi Clougherty JEi Paciorek CJi Wright RJi Levy JI. (2007). Predicting residential indoor
concentrations of nitrogen dioxide, fine particulate matter, and elemental carbon using questionnaire
and geographic information system based data. Atmos Environ, 41- 6561-6571. 092725
Bein KJi Zhao Yi Wexler ASi Johnston MV. (2005). Speciation of size-resolved individual ultrafine particles in
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. J Geophys Res, 110: D07S05. 156265
Birch ME. (1998). Analysis of carbonaceous aerosols' interlaboratory comparison. Analyst, 123- 851-857. 024953
Biswas Si Fine PMi Geller MDi Hering SVi Sioutas C. (2005). Performance evaluation of a recently developed
water-based condensation particle counter. Aerosol Sci Technol, 39- 419-427. 150694
Blanchard Pi Hopper JF. (1997). Concentrations and distributions of PAHs and n-alkanes in atmospheric
aerosols at non-urban sites in Ontario, Canada. Presented at 6th International Conference on
Carbonaceous Particles in the Atmosphere; Vienna, Austria. 157195
Blanchard P; Brook JR; Brazal P. (2002). Chemical characterization of the organic fraction of atmospheric
aerosol at two sites in Ontario, Canada. J Geophys Res, 107- D21. 189737
Blazso M> Janitsek S> Gelencser A; Artaxo P; Graham B; Andreae MO. (2003). Study of tropical organic aerosol
by thermally assisted alkylation-gas chromatography mass spectrometry. J Anal Appl Pyrol, 68- 351-369.
156278
Branis M; Rez cov P; Domasov M. (2005). The effect of outdoor air and indoor human activity on mass
concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, and PMI in a classroom. Environ Res, 99: 143-149. 156290
Brauer Mi Gehring Ui Brunekreef Bi De Jongste Ji Gerritsen Ji Rovers Mi Wichmann H"Ei Wijga Ai Heinrich J.
(2006). Traffic-related air pollution and otitis media. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 1414-1418. 090757
Brauer Mi Hoek Gi Smit HAi De Jongste JCi Gerritsen Ji Postma DSi Kerkhof Mi Brunekreef B. (2007). Air
pollution and development of asthma, allergy and infections in a birth cohort. Eur Respir J, 29: 879-888.
090691
Briggs DJi de Hoogh Ki Morris Ci Gulliver J. (2008). Effects of travel mode on exposures to particulate air
pollution. Environ Int, 34: 12-22. 156294
Brook JRi Burnett RT; Dann TF; Cakmak S; Goldberg MS; Fan X; Wheeler AJ. (2007). Further interpretation of
the acute effect of nitrogen dioxide observed in Canadian time-series studies. J Expo Sci Environ
Epidemiol, 17 : S36-S44. 091153
Brown K; Sarnat J; Suh H; Coull B; Spengler J; Koutrakis P. (2008). Ambient site, home outdoor and home
indoor particulate concentrations as proxies of personal exposures. J Environ Monit, 10: 1041-1051.
190894
Brunekreef B; Janssen N; De Hartog J; Oldenwening M; Meliefste K; Hoek G; Lanki T; Timonen K; Vallius M;
Pekkanen J; Van Grieken R. (2005). Personal, indoor, and outdoor exposures to PM2.5 and its
components for groups of cardiovascular patients in Amsterdam and Helsinki. , 127: 1-70. 090486
BeruBe KA; Sexton KJ; Jones TP; Moreno T; Anderson S; Richards RJ. (2004). The spatial and temporal
variations in PM10 mass from six UK homes. , 324: 41-53. 189731
Cabada JC; Rees S; Takahama S; Khlystov A; Pandis SN; Davidson CI; Robinson AL. (2004). Mass size
distributions and size resolved chemical composition of fine particulate matter at the Pittsburgh
supersite. Atmos Environ, 38: 3127-3141. 148859
Cao JJ; Lee SC; Chow JC; Cheng Y; Ho KF; Fung K; Liu SX; Watson JG. (2005). Indoor/outdoor relationships
for PM2.5 and associated carbonaceous pollutants at residential homes in Hong Kong - case study. Indoor
Air, 15: 197-204. 156321
Chakrabarti B; Fine PM; Delfino R; Sioutas C. (2004). Performance evaluation of the active-flow personal
DataRAM PM25 mass monitor (Thermo Anderson pDR-1200) designed for continuous personal exposure
measurements. Atmos Environ, 38: 3329-3340. 147867
Chang LT; Tang CS; Pan YZ; Chan CC. (2007). Association of Heart Rate Variability of the Elderly with
Personal Exposure to PMI, PM1-2.5, and PM2.5-10. 552-556. 156331
Charron A; Harrison RM; Quincey P. (2007). What are the sources and conditions responsible for exceedences of
the 24 h PM10 limit value (50 μg m-3) at a heavily trafficked London site?. Atmos Environ, 41: 1960"
1975. 156333
July 2009
A-337
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Cheng M-D; Hopke PK; Zeng Y. (1993). A receptor-oriented methodology for determining source regions of
particulate sulfate observed at Dorset, Ontario. J Geophys Res, 98: 16,839-16,849. 052294
Chillrud SN; Epstein D; Ross JM; Sax SN; Pederson D; Spengler JD; Kinney PL. (2004). Elevated airborne
exposures of teenagers to manganese, chromium, and iron from steel dust and New York City's subway
system. Environ Sci Technol, 38: 732-737. 054799
Chow JC. (1995). Measurement methods to determine compliance with ambient air quality standards for
suspended particles. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 45: 320-382. 077012
Chow JC. (2007). The application of thermal methods for determining chemical composition of carbonaceous
aerosols^ A review. , 42: 1521-1541. 157209
Chow JC; Chen L"WA; Lowenthal DH; Doraiswamy P; Park K; Kohl S; Trimble DL; Watson JG. (2005).
California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study (CRPAQS) - Initial data analysis of field program
measurements. 156348
Chow JC; Doraiswamy P; Watson JG; Chen LW; Ho SS; Sodeman DA. (2008). Advances in integrated and
continuous measurements for particle mass and chemical composition. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 58:
141-163. 156355
Chow JC; Watson JG; Chen LW; Chang MC; Robinson NF; Trimble D; Kohl S. (2007). The IMPROVE_A
temperature protocol for thermal/optical carbon analysis: maintaining consistency with a long-term
database. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 57: 1014-1023. 156354
Chow JC; Watson JG; Lowenthal DH; Magliano KL. (2005). Loss of PM2.5 nitrate from filter samples in central
California. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 55: 1158-68. 099030
Chuang K-J; Chan C"C; Chen N"T; Su T-C; Lin L-Y. (2005). Effects of particle size fractions on reducing heart
rate variability in cardiac and hypertensive patients. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 1693-1697. 087989
Chung A; Chang DP; KLeeman MJ; Perry KD; Cahill TA; Dutcher D; McDougall EM; Stroud K. (2001).
Comparison of real-time instruments used to monitor airborne particulate matter. J Air Waste Manag
Assoc, 51: 109-120. 156357
Cifuentes LA; Vega J; Kopfer K; Lave LB. (2000). Effect of the fine fraction of particulate matter versus the
coarse mass and other pollutants on daily mortality in Santiago, Chile. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 50:
1287-1298. 010351
Cohen BS; Heikkinen MSA; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M. (2004). Field evaluation of nanofilm
detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air. , 121: 1-35. 056909
Connell DP; Withum JA; Winter SE; Statnick RM; Bilonick RA. (2005). The Steubenville Comprehensive Air
Monitoring Program (SCAMP): associations among fine particulate matter, co-pollutants, and
meteorological conditions. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 55: 481-496. 089458
Conner TL; Williams RWE. (2004). Identification of possible sources of particulate matter in the personal cloud
using SEM/EDX. Atmos Environ, 38: 5305-5310. 156364
Cornell SE; Jickells TD. (1999). Water-soluble organic nitrogen in atmospheric aerosol: a comparison of UV and
persulfate oxidation methods. Atmos Environ, 33: 833-840. 156367
Cortez-Lugo M; Moreno-Macias H; Holguin-Molina F; Chow JC; Watson JG; Gutierrez-Avedoy V; Mandujano F;
Hernandez-Avila M; Romieu I. (2008). Relationship between indoor, outdoor, and personal fine particle
concentrations for individuals with COPD and predictors of indoor-outdoor ratio in Mexico city. J Expo
Sci Environ Epidemiol, 18: 109-115. 156368
Crimmins BS; Baker JE. (2006). Improved GC/MS methods for measuring hourly PAH and nitro-PAH
concentrations in urban particulate matter. Atmos Environ, 40: 6764-6779. 097008
Crist KC; Liu B; Kim M; Deshpande SR; John K. (2008). Characterization of fine particulate matter in Ohio:
Indoor, outdoor, and personal exposures. Environ Res, 106: 62-71. 156372
Cyrys J; Pitz M; Hazenkamp-von Arx ME; Kunzli N; Heinrich J. (2006). Evaluation of a sampling strategy for
estimation of long-term PM2.5 exposure for epidemiological studies. Environ Monit Assess, 119: 161-171.
156376
Cyrys J; Stolzel M; Heinrich J; Kreyling WG; Menzel N; Wittmaack K; Tuch T; Wichmann H"E. (2003).
Elemental composition and sources of fine and ultrafine ambient particles in Erfurt, Germany. Sci Total
Environ, 305: 143-156. 042232
Dams R; Rahn KA; Robbins JA; Nifong GD; Winchester JW. (1970). Multi-Element Analysis of Air Pollution
Particulates by Nondestructive Neutron Activation. Presented at . 156379
Decesari S; Facchini MC; Fuzzi S; McFiggans GB; Coe H; Bower KN. (2005). The water-soluble organic
component of size-segregated aerosol, cloud water and wet depositions from Jeju Island during ACE"
Asia. Atmos Environ, 39: 211-222. 144536
July 2009
A-338
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Delfino RJ; Quintana PJE; Floro J; Gastanaga VM; Samimi BS; KLeinman MT; Liu L-JS; Bufalino Ci Wu C-F;
McLaren CE. (2004). Association of FEV1 in asthmatic children with personal and microenvironmental
exposure to airborne particulate matter. Environ Health Perspect, 112- 932-941. 056897
Delfino RJ; Staimer N> Gillen D; Tjoa T> Sioutas C> Fung K George SC; KLeinman MT. (2006). Personal and
ambient air pollution is associated with increased exhaled nitric oxide in children with asthma. Environ
Health Perspect, 114: 1736-1743. 090745
Demokritou P; Gupta T> Ferguson Si Koutrakis P. (2002). Development and laboratory performance evaluation
of a personal cascade impactor. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 52: 1230-1237. 156393
Dermentzoglou Mi Manoli Ei Voutsa Di Samara C. (2003). Sources and patterns of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons and heavy metals in fine indoor particulate matter of Greek houses. , 12: 1511-1519.
156395
Diapouli Ei Chaloulakou Ai Mihalopoulos Ni Spyrellis N. (2008). Indoor and outdoor PM mass and number
concentrations at schools in the Athens area. , 136: 13-20. 190893
Diapouli Ei Chaloulakou Ai Spyrellis N. (2007). Levels of ultrafine particles in different microenvironments--
implications to children exposure. Sci Total Environ, 388: 128-136. 156397
Dills RLAi Paulsen Mi Ahmad Ji Kalman DAAi Elias FNAi Simpson CD. (2006). Evaluation of urinary
methoxyphenols as biomarkers of woodsmoke exposure. Environ Sci Technol, 40: 2163-2170. 156402
Dimitroulopoulou Ci Ashmore MRi Hill MTRi Byrne MAi Kinnersley R. (2006). INDAIR: a probabilistic model of
indoor air pollution in UK homes. Atmos Environ, 40: 6362-6379. 090302
Dong Yi Hays MDi Dean Smith Ni Kinsey JS. (2004). Inverting cascade impactor data for size-resolved
characterization of fine particulate source emissions. J Aerosol Sci, 35: 1497-1512. 156409
Drewnick F> Schwab JJi Hogrefe Oi Peters Si Husain Li Diamond Di Weber Ri Demerjian KL. (2003).
Intercomparison and evaluation of four semi-continuous PM2.5 sulfate instruments. Atmos Environ, 37:
3335-3350. 099160
Eatough DJi Eatough NL; Obeidi F; Pang Y; Modey W', Long R. (2001). Continuous determination of PM25
mass, including semi-volatile species. Aerosol Sci Technol, 34: 1-8. 010303
Ebelt ST; Wilson WE; Brauer M. (2005). Exposure to ambient and nonambient components of particulate
matter: a comparison of health effects. Epidemiology, 16: 396-405. 056907
Ellis EC; Novakov T. (1982). Application of thermal analysis to the characterization of organic aerosol particles.
Sci Total Environ, 23: 227-238. 156416
Emmenegger C; Reinhardt A; Hueglin C; Zenobi R; Kalberer M. (2007). Evaporative light scattering: A novel
detection method for the quantitative analysis of humic-like substances in aerosols. Environ Sci Technol,
41: 2473-2478. 156418
Engling G; Carrico CM; Kreidenweis SM; Collett JL; Day DE; Malm WC; Lincoln E; Min Hao W; Iinuma Y;
Herrmann H. (2006). Determination of levoglucosan in biomass combustion aerosol by high-performance
anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection. Atmos Environ, 40: 299-311.
156422
Fabbri D; Prati S; Vassura I. (2002). Molecular characterisation of organic material in air fine particles (PM10)
using conventional and reactive pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Environ Monit, 4-
210-215. 156426
Falkovich AH; Rudich Y. (2001). Analysis of semivolatile organic compounds in atmospheric aerosols by direct
sample introduction thermal desorption GC/MS. Environ Sci Technol, 35: 2326-2333. 156427
Falkovich AH; Schkolnik G; Ganor E; Rudich Y. (2004). Adsorption of organic compounds pertinent to urban
environments onto mineral dust particles. J Geophys Res, 109: D02208. 156428
Farmer PB; Singh R; Kaur B; Sram RJ; Binkova B; Kalina I; Popov TA; Garte S; Taioli E; Gabelova A;
Cebulska-Wasilewska A. (2003). Molecular epidemiology studies of carcinogenic environmental
pollutants: effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in environmental pollution on exogenous
and oxidative DNA damage. , 544: 397-402. 089017
Fehsenfeld FC; Hastie D; Chow JC; Solomon PA. (2004). Particle and gas measurements. : . 156432
Feldpausch P; Fiebig M; Fritzsche L; Petzold A. (2006). Measurement of ultrafine aerosol size distributions by a
combination of diffusion screen separators and condensation particle counters. J Aerosol Sci, 37: 577-597.
155773
Ferro AR; Kopperud RJ; Hildemann LM. (2004). Elevated personal exposure to particulate matter from human
activities in a residence. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, l: S34-S40. 055676
Ferro AR; Kopperud RJ; Hildemann LM. (2004). Source strengths for indoor human activities that resuspend
particulate matter. Environ Sci Technol, 38: 1759-1764. 055387
Filleul L; Baldi I; Dartigues J-F; Tessier J-F. (2003). Risk factors among elderly for short term deaths related to
high levels of air pollution. Occup Environ Med, 60: 684-688. 087403
July 2009
A-339
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Filleul L; Le Tertre A; Baldi I; Tessier J-F. (2004). Difference in the relation between daily mortality and air
pollution among elderly and all-ages populations in southwestern France. Environ Res, 94- 249-253.
087404
Filleul L; Rondeau V; Vandentorren Si Le Moual Ni Cantagrel Ai Annesi-Maesano Ii Charpin Di Declercq Ci
Neukirch Fi Paris Ci Vervloet Di Brochard Pi Tessier JFi Kauffmann Fi Baldi I. (2005). Twenty five year
mortality and air pollution - results from the French PAARC survey. Occup Environ Med, 62- 453-460.
087357
Fine PMi Jaques PAi Hering SVi Sioutas C. (2003). Performance Evaluation and Use of a Continuous Monitor
for Measuring Size-Fractionated PM 2.5 Nitrate. Aerosol Sci Technol, 37- 342 - 354. 155775
Finkelstein MMi Jerrett Mi DeLuca Pi Finkelstein Ni Verma DKi Chapman Ki Sears MR. (2003). Relation
between income, air pollution and mortality- a cohort study. CMAJ, 169- 397-402. 056117
Fitz Di Chan Mi Cass Gi Lawson Di Ashbaugh L. (1989). A multi-component size-classifying aerosol and gas
sampler for ambient air monitoring. Presented at Presented at- 82nd annual meeting of the Air & Waste
Management Association; June! Anaheim, CA. Pittsburgh, PA- Air & Waste Management Association!
paper no. 89-140.1. 077387
Fraser MP; Yue ZW; Buzcu B. (2003). Source apportionment of fine particulate matter in Houston, TX, using
organic molecular markers. Atmos Environ, 37: 2117-2123. 042231
Fraser MP; Yue ZW; Tropp RJ; Kohl SD; Chow JC. (2002). Molecular composition of organic fine particulate
matter in Houston, TX. Atmos Environ, 36: 5751-5758. 140741
Fromme H; Diemer J; Dietrich S; Cyrys J; Heinrich J; Lang W', Kiranoglu M; Twardella D. (2008). Chemical and
morphological properties of particulate matter (PM10, PM25) in school classrooms and outdoor air.
Atmos Environ, 42(27): 6597-6605. 155147
Fromme H; Heitmann D; Schierl R; Liebl B; RDden H; Twardella D; Dietrich S. (2007). Particulate matter in
the indoor air of classrooms-exploratory results from Munich and surrounding area. Atmos Environ, 41:
854-866. 156453
Fruin S; Westerdahl D; Sax T; Sioutas C; Fine PM. (2008). Measurements and predictors of on-road ultrafine
particle concentrations and associated pollutants in Los Angeles. Atmos Environ, 42: 207-219. 097183
Gadkari NM; Pervez S. (2007). Source investigation of personal particulates in relation to identify major routes
of exposure among urban residentials. Atmos Environ, 41: 7951-7963. 156459
Gauvin S; Reungoat P; Cassadou S; Dechenaux J; Momas I; Just J; Zmirou D. (2002). Contribution of indoor and
outdoor environments to PM2.5 personal exposure of children-'VESTA study. Sci Total Environ, 297:
175-181. 034893
Geyh A; Chillrud S; Wiliams D; Herbstman J; Symons J; Rees K; Ross J; Kim S; Lim H; Turpin B; Breysse P.
(2005). Assessing truck driver exposure at the World Trade Center disaster site: personal and area
monitoring for particulate matter and volatile organic compounds during October 2001 and April 2002. J
Occup Environ Hyg, 2' 179-193. 186949
Geyh AS; Hering S; Kreisberg N> John W. (2004). Evaluation of a personal and microenvironmental aerosol
speciation sampler (PMASS). 1"22. 156467
Gomez-Perales JE; Colvile RN; Fernandez-Bremauntz AA; Gutierrez "Ave doy V; Paramo-Figueroa VH; Bianco-
Jimenez S; Bueno-Lopez E; Bernabe-Cabanillas R; Mandujano F; Hidalgo "Navarro M; Nieuwenhuijsen
MJ. (2007). Bus, minibus, metro inter-comparison of commuters' exposure to air pollution in Mexico City.
Atmos Environ, 41: 890-901. 138816
Gomez-Perales JE; Colvile RN; Nieuwenhuijsen MJ; Fernandez-Bremauntz A; Gutierrez-Avedoy VJ; Paramo-
Figueroa VH; Bianco-Jimenez S; Bueno-Lopez E; Mandujano F; Bernabe-Cabanillas R; Ortiz-Segovia E.
(2004). Commuters' exposure to PM25, CO, and benzene in public transport in the metropolitan area of
Mexico City. Atmos Environ, 38: 1219-1229. 054418
Gouveia N; Fletcher T. (2000). Time series analysis of air pollution and mortality: effects by cause, age and
socioeconomic status. J Epidemiol Community Health, 54: 750-755. 012132
Goyal P; Sidhartha. (2004). Modeling and monitoring of suspended particulate matter from Badarpur thermal
power station, Delhi. , 19: 383-390. 156487
Graham B; Falkovich AH; Rudich Y; Maenhaut W; Guyon P; Andreae MO. (2004). Local and regional
contributions to the atmospheric aerosol over Tel Aviv, Israel: a case study using elemental, ionic and
organic tracers. Atmos Environ, 38: 1593-1604. 156490
Graney JR; Landis MS; Norris GA. (2004). Concentrations and solubility of metals from indoor and personal
exposure PM25 samples. Atmos Environ, 38: 237-247. 053756
Greaves RC; Barkley RM; Sievers RE. (1985). Rapid sampling and analysis of volatile constituents of airborne
particulate matter. Anal Chem, 57: 2807-2815. 156494
July 2009
A-340
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Greaves RC; Barkley RM! Sievers RE; Meglen RR. (1987). Covariations in the concentrations of organic
compounds associated with springtime atmospheric aerosols. Atmos Environ, 21- 2549-2561. 156495
Grosjean D; Seinfeld JH. (1989). Parameterization of the formation potential of secondary organic aerosols.
Atmos Environ, 23: 1733-1747. 045643
Grover BD; KLeinman M; Eatough NL; Eatough DJ; Hopke PK; Long RW; Wilson WE; Meyer MB; Ambs JL.
(2005). Measurement of total PM25 mass (nonvolatile plus semivolatile) with the Filter Dynamic
Measurement System tapered element oscillating microbalance monitor. J Geophys Res, 110D07S03.
090044
Gulliver J; Briggs DJ. (2004). Personal exposure to particulate air pollution in transport microenvironments.
Atmos Environ, 38: 1-8. 053238
Gulliver J; Briggs DJ. (2007). Journey-time exposure to particulate air pollution. Atmos Environ, 41: 7195-7207.
155814
Guo H; Lee SC; Chan LY. (2004). Indoor air quality investigation at air-conditioned and non-air-conditioned
markets in Hong Kong. Sci Total Environ, 323: 87"98. 156506
Gwynn RC; Thurston GD. (2001). The burden of air pollution: impacts among racial minorities. Environ Health
Perspect, 1094: 501-506. 017206
Hall PA; Watson AFR; Garner GV; Hall K; Smith S; Waterman D; Horsfield B. (1999). An investigation of
micro-scale sealed vessel thermal extraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (MSSV"GC"MS#)
and micro-scale sealed vessel pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry applied to a standard
reference material of an urban dust. Sci Total Environ, 235: 269-276. 156512
Hamilton JF; Webb PJ; Lewis AC; Hopkins JR; Smith S; Davy P. (2004). Partially oxidised organic components
in urban aerosol using GCXGC-TOF/MS. , 4- 1279-1290. 156516
Hamilton JF; Webb PJ; Lewis AC; Reviejo MM. (2005). Quantifying small molecules in secondary organic
aerosol formed during the photo-oxidation of toluene with hydroxyl radicals. Atmos Environ, 39: 7263"
7275. 088173
Hanninen OO; Lebret E; Ilacqua V; Katsouyanni K; Kunzli N; Sram RJ; Jantunen M. (2004). Infiltration of
ambient PM2.5 and levels of indoor generated non-ETS PM2.5 in residences of four European cities.
Atmos Environ, 38: 6411-6423. 056812
Haverinen-Shaughnessy U; Toivola M; Aim S; Putus T; Nevalainen A. (2007). Personal and microenvironmental
concentrations of particles and microbial aerosol in relation to health symptoms among teachers. J Expo
Sci Environ Epidemiol, 17: 182-190. 156526
Hays MD; Smith ND; Dong Y. (2004). Nature of unresolved complex mixture in size "distributed emissions from
residential wood combustion as measured by thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass
spectrometry. J Geophys Res, 109: D16S04. 156530
Hays MD; Smith ND; Kinsey J; Dong Y; Kariher P. (2003). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon size distributions in
aerosols from appliances of residential wood combustion as determined by direct thermal desorption—
GC/MS. J Aerosol Sci, 34: 1061-1084. 156529
Hazenkamp-von Arx ME; Fellmann TG; Oglesby L; Ackermann-Liebrich U; Gislason T; Heinrich J; Jarvis D;
Luczynska C; Manzanera AJ; Modig L; Norback D; Pfeifer A; Poli A; Ponzio M; Soon A; Vermeire P;
Kunzli N. (2003). PM2.5 assessment in 21 European study centers of ECRHS II: Method and first winter
results. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 53: 617-628. 136487
Helmig D; Bauer A; Mueller J; Klein W. (1990). Analysis of particulate organics in a forest atmosphere by
thermodesorption GC/MS. Atmos Environ, 24: 179-184. 156536
Henderson SB; Beckerman B; Jerrett M; Brauer M. (2007). Application of land use regression to estimate long-
term concentrations of traffic-related nitrogen oxides and fine particulate matter. Environ Sci Technol,
41: 2422-2428. 090675
Henning S; Weingartner E; Schwikowski M; Gaggeler HW; Gehrig R; Hinz KP; Trimborn A; Spengler B;
Baltensperger U. (2003). Seasonal variation of water-soluble ions of the aerosol at the high-alpine site
Jungfraujoch (3580 m asl). J Geophys Res, 108: 4030. 156539
Henry RC. (1997). History and fundamentals of multivariate air quality receptor models. , 37: 37"42. 020941
Henry RC. (2003). Multivariate receptor modeling by N-dimensional edge detection. , 65: 179-189. 156540
Henry RC; Chang YS; Spiegelman CH. (2002). Locating nearby sources of air pollution by nonparametric
regression of atmospheric concentrations on wind direction. Atmos Environ, 36: 2237-2244. 136097
Hering S; Cass G. (1999). The magnitude of bias in the measurement of PM2.5 arising from volatilization of
particulate nitrate from Teflon filters. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 49: 725-733. 084958
Hering S; Fine PM; Sioutas C; Jaques PA; Ambs JL; Hogrefe O; Demerjian KL. (2004). Field assessment of the
dynamics of particulate nitrate vaporization using differential TEOM® and automated nitrate monitors.
Atmos Environ, 38: 5183-5192. 155837
July 2009
A-341
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Hering SV; Lawson DR; Allegrini I; Febo A; Perrino C; Possanzini M; Sickles JE II; Anlauf KG; Wiebe A; Appel
BR; John W; Ondo J; Wall S; Braman RS; Sutton R; Cass GR; Solomon PA; Eatough DJ; Eatough NL;
Ellis EC; Grosjean D; Hicks BB; Womack JD; Horrocks J; Knapp KT; Ellestad TG; Paur RJ; Mitchell WJ;
Pleasant M; Peake E; MacLean A; Pierson WR; Brachaczek W', Schiff HI; Mackay GI; Spicer CW;. (1988).
The nitric acid shootout- field comparison of measurement methods. Atmos Environ, 22: 1519-1539.
036012
Hering SV; Stolzenburg MR; Quant FR; Oberreit DR; Keady PB. (2005). A Laminar-Flow, Water-Based
Condensation Particle Counter (WCPC). Aerosol Sci Technol, 39- 659-672. 155838
Hermann M; Wehner B; Bischof O; Han HS; Krinke T; Liu W', Zerrath A; Wiedensohler A. (2007). Particle
counting efficiencies of new TSI condensation particle counters. J Aerosol Sci, 38- 674-682. 155840
Hertel O; Storm L; Stausgaard L; Hvidberg M; Ketzel M. (2008). A proper choice of route significantly reduces
air pollution exposure - A study on bicycle and bus trips in urban streets. Sci Total Environ, 389- 58-70.
156543
Hidy GM; Friedlander SK. (1972). The nature of the Los Angeles aerosol. Presented at . 156546
Ho KF; Cao JJ; Harrison RM; Lee SC. (2004). Indoor/outdoor relationships of organic carbon (OC) and elemental
carbon (EC) in PM2.5 in roadside environment of Hong Kong. Atmos Environ, 38- 6327-6335. 056804
Ho KF; Chow JC; Watson JG; Fung K; Lee SC; Cao JJ; Li YS. (2006). Variability of organic and elemental
carbon, water soluble organic carbon, and isotopes in Hong Kong. , 6- 4579-4600. 156552
Ho SSH; Yu JZ. (2004). In-injection port thermal desorption and subsequent gas chromatography—mass
spectrometric analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and n-alkanes in atmospheric aerosol
samples. J Chromatogr, 1059- 121-129. 156551
Hoek G; Brunekreef B; Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Van den Brandt PA. (2002). Association between mortality and
indicators of traffic-related air pollution in the Netherlands' a cohort study. Lancet, 360- 1203-1209.
042364
Hoek G; de Hartog J; Meliefste K; ten Brink H; Katsouyanni K; Karakatsani A; Lianou M; Kotronarou A;
Kavouras I; Pekkanen J; Vallius M; Kulmala M; Puustinen A; Thomas S; Meddings C; Ayres J; van
Wijnen J; Hameri K; Kos G; Harrison R. (2008). Indoor-outdoor relationships of particle number and
mass in four European cities. Atmos Environ, 42- 156-169. 156554
Hogrefe O; Schwab JJ; Drewnick F; Lala GG; Peters S; Demerjian KL; Rhoads K; Felton HD; Rattigan OV;
Husain L; Dutkiewicz VA. (2004). Semicontinuous PM2.5 sulfate and nitrate measurements at an urban
and a rural location in New York- PMTACS-NY summer 2001 and 2002 campaigns. J Air Waste Manag
Assoc, 54: 1040-60. 099003
Holguin F; Tellez-Rojo MM; Hernandez M; Cortez M; Chow JC; Watson JG; Mannino D; Romieu I. (2003). Air
pollution and heart rate variability among the elderly in Mexico City. Epidemiology, 14: 521-527. 057326
Hopke PK; Li CL; Ciszek W; Landsberger S. (1995). The use of bootstrapping to estimate conditional probability
fields for source locations of airborne pollutants. , 30: 69"79. 156566
Hopke PK; Ramadan Z; Paatero P; Norris GA; Landis MS; Williams RW; Lewis CW. (2003). Receptor modeling
of ambient and personal exposure samples: 1998 Baltimore Particulate Matter Epidemiology-Exposure
Study. Atmos Environ, 37: 3289-3302. 095544
Hystad P; Setton E; Allen R; Keller P; Brauer M. (2008). Modeling residential fine particulate matter
infiltration for exposure assessment. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, In Press: In Press. 190890
Ito E Thurston GD. (1996). Daily PMlO/mortality associations: an investigation of at-risk subpopulations. J
Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 6: 79-95. 078841
Ito K; Thurston GD; Silverman RA. (2007). Characterization of PM2.5, gaseous pollutants, and meteorological
interactions in the context of time-series health effects models. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 17 Suppl
2: S45-60. 156594
Jacquemin B; Cabrera L; Querol X; Bellander T; Moreno N; Peters A; Pey J; Pekkanen J; Lanki T; Sunyer J.
(2007). Levels of outdoor PM2.5, absorbance and sulphur as surrogates for personal exposures among
post-myocardial infarction patients in Barcelona, Spain. Atmos Environ, 41: 1539-1549. 156600
Jacquemin B; Sunyer J; Forsberg B; Gotschi T; Bayer-Oglesby L; Ackermann-Liebrich U; de Marco R; Heinrich
J; Jarvis D; Toren K; Kiinzli N. (2007). Annoyance due to air pollution in Europe. Int J Epidemiol, 10: 1-
12.192372
Jansen KL; Larson TV; Koenig JQ; Mar TF; Fields C; Stewart J; Lippmann M. (2005). Associations between
health effects and particulate matter and black carbon in subjects with respiratory disease. Environ
Health Perspect, 113: 1741-1746. 082236
Janssen NA; Lanki T; Hoek G; Vallius M; De Hartog JJ; Van Grieken R; PekkanenJ; Brunekreef B. (2005).
Associations between ambient, personal, and indoor exposure to fine particulate matter constituents in
Dutch and Finnish panels of cardiovascular patients. Occup Environ Med, 62: 868-877. 088692
July 2009
A-342
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Jaques PA; Ambs JL; Grant WL; Sioutas C. (2004). Field evaluation of the differential TEOM monitor for
continuous PM 2.5 mass concentrations. Aerosol Sci Technol, 38- 49"59. 155878
Jedrychowski WA; Perera FP; Pac A; Jacek R; Whyatt RM; Spengler JD; Dumyahn TS; Sochacka-Tatara E.
(2006). Variability of total exposure to PM2.5 related to indoor and outdoor pollution sources Krakow
study in pregnant women. Sci Total Environ, 366- 47"54. 156606
Jeon SJ; Meuzelaar HLC; Sheya SAN; Lighty JS; Jarman WM! Kasteler C> Sarofim AF; Simoneit BRT. (2001).
Exploratory studies of PM10 receptor and source profiling by GC/MS and principal component analysis of
temporally and spatially resolved ambient samples. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 51- 766-784. 016636
Jo WE Lee JY. (2006). Indoor and outdoor levels of respirable particulates (PM10) and Carbon Monoxide (CO)
in high-rise apartment buildings. Atmos Environ, 40- 6067-6076. 156613
Johannesson Si Gustafson Pi Molnar Pi Barregard Li Sallsten G. (2007). Exposure to fine particles (PM2.5 and
PMl) and black smoke in the general population- personal, indoor, and outdoor levels. J Expo Sci
Environ Epidemiol, 17- 613-624. 156614
John Wi Wall SMi Ondo JL. (1988). A new method for nitric acid and nitrate aerosol measurement using the
dichotomous sampler. Atmos Environ, 22- 1627-1635. 045903
Jones AM; Harrison RM. (2006). Assessment of natural components of PM10 at UK urban and rural sites.
Atmos Environ, 40: 7733-7741. 155886
Jones J; Stick S; Dingle P; Franklin P. (2007). Spatial variability of particulates in homes: implications for
infant exposure. Sci Total Environ, 376: 317-323. 156615
Kaur S; Nieuwenhuijsen MJ Colvile R. (2005). Personal exposure of street canyon intersection users to PM25,
ultrafine particle counts and carbon monoxide in central London, UK. Atmos Environ, 39: 3629-3641.
086504
Kaur S; Nieuwenhuijsen MJ; Colvile RN. (2005). Pedestrian exposure to air pollution along a major road in
Central London, UK. Atmos Environ, 39: 7307-7320. 088175
Keeler GJ; Samson PJ. (1989). Spatial representativeness of trace element ratios. Environ Sci Technol, 23:
1358-1364. 156633
Khlystov A; Stanier CO; Takahama S; Pandis SN. (2005). Water content of ambient aerosol during the
Pittsburgh Air Quality Study. J Geophys Res, 110: D07S10. 156635
Kidwell CB; Ondov JM. (2001). Development and evaluation of a prototype system for collecting sub-hourly
ambient aerosol for chemical analysis. Aerosol Sci Technol, 35: 596-601. 017092
Kidwell CB; Ondov JM. (2004). Elemental Analysis of Sub-Hourly Ambient Aerosol Collections. Aerosol Sci
Technol, 38: 205-218. 155898
Kim D; Sass-Kortsak A; Purdham JT; Dales RE; Brook JR. (2005). Sources of personal exposure to fine particles
in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 55: 1134-1146. 156640
Kinsey JS; Mitchell WA; Squier WC; Linna K; King FG; Logan R; Dong Y; Thompson GJ; Clark NN. (2006).
Evaluation of methods for the determination of diesel-generated fine particulate matter: Physical
characterization results. J Aerosol Sci, 37: 63"87. 130654
Kiss G; Varga B; Galambos I; Ganszky I. (2002). Characterization of water-soluble organic matter isolated from
atmospheric fine aerosol. J Geophys Res, 107: 8339. 156646
Klinmalee A; Srimongkol K; Kim Oanh NT. (2008). Indoor air pollution levels in public buildings in Thailand
and exposure assessment. Environ Monit Assess, In Press: In Press. 190888
Koenig JQ; Jansen K; Mar TF; Lumley T; Kaufman J; Trenga CA; Sullivan J; Liu LJ; Shapiro GG; Larson TV.
(2003). Measurement of offline exhaled nitric oxide in a study of community exposure to air pollution.
Environ Health Perspect, 111: 1625-1629. 156653
Koistinen KJ; Edwards RD; Mathys P; Ruuskanen J; Kunzli N; Jantunen MJ. (2004). Sources of fine particulate
matter in personal exposures and residential indoor, residential outdoor and workplace
microenvironments in the Helsinki phase of the EXPOLIS study. Scand J Work Environ Health, 30
Suppl 2: 36-46. 156655
Koistinen KJ; Kousa A; Tenhola V; Hanninen O; Jantunen MJ; Oglesby L; Kuenzli N; Georgoulis L. (1999). Fine
particle (PM25) measurement methodology, quality assurance procedures and pilot results of the
EXPOLIS study. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 49: 1212-1220. 010628
Kousa A; Monn C; Rotko T; Aim S; Oblesby L; Jantunen MJ. (2001). Personal exposures to N02 in the
EXPOLIS-study: relation to residential indoor, outdoor and workplace concentrations in Basel, Helsinki
and Prague. Atmos Environ, 35: 3405-3412. 025270
Koutrakis P; Suh HH; Sarnat JA; Brown KW; Coull BA; Schwartz J. (2005). Characterization of particulate and
gas exposures of sensitive subpopulations living in Baltimore and Boston. , 131: 1-65. 095800
July 2009
A-343
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Krewski D; Burnett RT; Goldberg MS; Hoover K; Siemiatycki J; Jerrett MJ Abrahamowicz MJ White WH.
(2000). Reanalysis of the Harvard Six Cities study and the American Cancer Society study of particulate
air pollution and mortality- a special report of the Institute's Particle Epidemiology Reanalysis Project.
Health Effects Institute. Cambridge, MA. 012281
Kulkarni MM; Patil RS. (2003). Personal exposure to toxic metals in an Indian metropolitan region. , 84- 23"29.
156664
Kulmala M; Mordas G; Petaja T; Gronholm T; Aalto PP; Vehkamaki H; Hienola AI; Herrmann E; Sipila M;
Riipinen I. (2007). The condensation particle counter battery (CPCB)' A new tool to investigate the
activation properties of nanoparticles. J Aerosol Sci, 38- 289-304. 155911
Kulmala M; Riipinen I; Sipila M; Manninen HE; Petaja T; Junninen H; Maso MD; Mordas G; Mirme A; Vana M;
Hirsikko A; Laakso L; Harrison RM; Hanson I; Leung C; Lehtinen KE; Kerminen VM. (2007). Toward
direct measurement of atmospheric nucleation. , 318- 89"92. 097838
Kumar R; Elizabeth A; Gawane AG. (2006). Air quality profile of inorganic ionic composition of fine aerosols at
two sites in Mumbai City. Aerosol Sci Technol, 40- 477-489. 129347
Labban R; Veranth JM; Watson JG; Chow JC. (2006). Feasibility of soil dust source apportionment by the
pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry method. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 56- 1230-1242.
156665
Lai CH; Liou SH; Shih TS; Tsai PJ; Chen HL; Chang YC; Buckley TJ; Strickland P; Jaakkola JJ. (2004).
Exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) among highway toll station workers in taipei- direct and
indirect exposure assessment. , 59- 138-148. 156666
Lai HK; Bayer-Oglesby L; Colvile R; Gotschi T; Jantunen MJ; Kunzli N; Kulinskaya E; Schweizer C;
Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. (2006). Determinants of indoor air concentrations of PM25, black smoke and N02 in
six European cities (EXPOLIS study). Atmos Environ, 40: 1299-1313. 090262
Lai HK; Kendall M; Ferrier H; Lindup I; Aim S; Hanninen 0; Jantunen M; Mathys P; Colvile R; Ashmore MR;
Cullinan P; Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. (2004). Personal exposures and microenvironment concentrations of
PM25, VOC, N02 and CO in Oxford, UK. Atmos Environ, 38: 6399-6410. 056811
Lake DA; Tolocka MP; Johnston MV; Wexler AS. (2003). Mass Spectrometry of Individual Particles between 50
and 750 nm in Diameter at the Baltimore Supersite. Environ Sci Technol, 37: 3268-3274. 156669
Lake DA; Tolocka MP; Johnston MV; Wexler AS. (2004). The character of single particle sulfate in Baltimore.
Atmos Environ, 38: 5311-5320. 088411
Larson T; Gould T; Simpson C; Liu LJ; Claiborn C; Lewtas J. (2004). Source apportionment of indoor, outdoor,
and personal PM2.5 in Seattle, Washington, using positive matrix factorization. J Air Waste Manag
Assoc, 54: 1175-87. 098145
Laurent O; Pedrono G; Segala C; Filleul L; Havard S; Deguen S; Schillinger C; Riviere E; Bard D. (2008). Air
pollution, asthma attacks, and socioeconomic deprivation: a small-area case-crossover study. Am J
Epidemiol, 168: 58-65. 156672
Lee JH; Hopke PK; Holsen TM; Polissar AV. (2005). Evaluation of Continuous and Filter-Based Methods for
Measuring PM 2.5 Mass Concentration. Aerosol Sci Technol, 39: 290-303. 156680
Lee JH; Hopke PK; Holsen TM; Polissar AV; Lee DW; Edgerton ES; Ondov JM; Allen G. (2005). Measurements
of fine particle mass concentrations using continuous and integrated monitors in Eastern US Cities.
Aerosol Sci Technol, 39: 261-275. 128139
Lee JT; Son JY; Kim H; Kim SY. (2006). Effect of air pollution on asthma-related hospital admissions for
children by socioeconomic status associated with area of residence. Arch Environ Occup Health, 61: 123-
30. 098248
Lee SA; Adhikari A; Grinshpun SA; McKay R; Shukla R; Reponen T. (2006). Personal exposure to airborne dust
and microorganisms in agricultural environments. , 3: 118-30. 188450
Lee SJ; Demokritou P; Koutrakis P; Delgado-Saborit JM. (2006). Development and evaluation of personal
respirable particulate sampler (PRPS). Atmos Environ, 40: 212-224. 098249
Lewis CW; Norris GA; Conner TL; Henry RC. (2003). Source apportionment of Phoenix PM2.5 aerosol with the
Unmix Receptor model. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 53: 325-338. 088413
Lewne M; Nise G; Lind ML; Gustavsson P. (2006). Exposure to particles and nitrogen dioxide among taxi, bus
and lorry drivers. , 79: 220-226. 189293
Lewne M; Plato N> Gustavsson P. (2007). Exposure to particles, elemental carbon and nitrogen dioxide in
workers exposed to motor exhaust. Ann Occup Hyg, 51: 693-701. 156690
Li W-W; Paschold H; Morales H; Chianelli J. (2003). Correlations between short-term indoor and outdoor PM
concentrations at residences with evaporative coolers. Atmos Environ, 37: 2691-2703. 047845
July 2009
A-344
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Li YC; Yu JZ. (2005). Simultaneous Determination of Mono-and Dicarboxylic Acids, o-Oxo-carboxylic Acids,
Midchain Ketocarboxylic Acids, and Aldehydes in Atmospheric Aerosol Samples. Environ Sci Technol, 39-
7616-7624. 156692
Liao CM; Chen SC; Chen JW; Liang HM. (2006). Contributions of Chinese-style cooking and incense burning to
personal exposure and residential PM concentrations in Taiwan region. , 358- 72"84. 188451
Lim HJ; Allen G> Maring H; Solomon P; Turpin BJ; Edgerton Ei Hering SV. (2003). Semicontinuous aerosol
carbon measurements' Comparison of Atlanta supersite measurements. J Geophys Res, 108- SOS-SOS.
156697
Linn WS; Gong H Jr. (1999). The 21st century environment and air quality influences on asthma. Curr Opin
Pulm Med, 5: 21-26. 011680
Lithgow GA; Robinson AL; Buckley SG. (2004). Ambient measurements of metal-containing PM25 in an urban
environment using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Atmos Environ, 38- 3319-3328. 126616
Liu L-J; Box Mi Kalman Di Kaufman Ji Koenig Ji Larson Ti Lumley Ti Sheppard Li Wallace L. (2003). Exposure
assessment of particulate matter for susceptible populations in Seattle. Environ Health Perspect, 11-
909-918. 073841
Liu Yi Woodin MAi Hauser Ri Williams PLi Herrick RFi Christiani DCi Smith TJ. (2005). Estimation of
personal exposures to particulate matter and metals in boiler overhaul work. J Occup Environ Med, 47-
68-78. 156704
Lonati Gi Giugliano Mi Butelli Pi Romele Li Tardivo R. (2005). Major chemical components of PM25 in Milan
(Italy). Atmos Environ, 39- 1925-1934. 126171
Lunden MMi Kirchstetter TWi Thatcher TLi Hering SVi Brown NJ. (2008). Factors affecting the indoor
concentrations of carbonaceous aerosols of outdoor origin. Atmos Environ, 42- 5660-5671. 155949
Lung SCi Mao IF; Liu LJ. (2007). Residents' particle exposures in six different communities in Taiwan. Sci Total
Environ, 377: 81-92. 156719
Macintosh D; Minegishi T; Kaufman M; Baker B; Allen J; Levy J; Myatt T. (2009). The benefits of whole-house
in-duct air cleaning in reducing exposures to fine particulate matter of outdoor origin: A modeling
analysis. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, x: x. 190887
Mader BT; Yu JZ; Xu JH; Li QF; Wu WS; Flagan RC; Seinfeld JH. (2004). Molecular composition of the water-
soluble fraction of atmospheric carbonaceous aerosols collected during ACE"Asia. J Geophys Res, 109:
D06206.156724
Magari SR; Schwartz J; Williams PL; Hauser R; Smith TJ; Christiani DC. (2002). The association of particulate
air metal concentrations with heart rate variability. Environ Health Perspect, 110: 875-880. 034813
Maitre A; Soulat JM; Masclet P; Stoklov M; Marques M; de Gaudemaris R. (2002). Exposure to carcinogenic air
pollutants among policemen working close to traffic in an urban area. Scand J Work Environ Health, 28:
402-410. 156726
Malm WC; Collett Jr; McMeeking G; Lee T; Carrillo J; Schichtel B; Day DE; Carrico C; Kreidenweis SM. (2005).
Intercomparison and closure calculations using measurements of aerosol species and optical properties
during the Yosemite aerosol characterization study. J Geophys Res, 110: 1-21. 156729
Manchester-Neesvig JB; Schauer JJ; Cass GR. (2003). The distribution of particle-phase organic compounds in
the atmosphere and their use for source apportionment during the Southern California Children's Health
Study. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 53: 1065-79. 098102
Mar TF; Koenig JQ; Jansen K; Sullivan J; Kaufman J; Trenga CA; Siahpush SH; Liu L-JS; Neas L. (2005). Fine
particulate air pollution and cardiorespiratory effects in the elderly. Epidemiology, 16: 681-687. 087566
Martins MCH; Fatigati FL; Vespoli TC; Martins LC; Martins MA; Saldiva PHN; Braga ALF. (2004). Influence of
socioeconomic conditions on air pollution effects in elderly people an analysis of six regions in Sao Paolo,
Brazil. J Epidemiol Community Health, 58: 41-46. 087457
Martuzevicius D; Grinshpun S; Lee T; Hu S; Biswas P; Reponen T; LeMasters G. (2008). Traffic-related PM2. 5
aerosol in residential houses located near major highways: Indoor versus outdoor concentrations. Atmos
Environ, 27: 6575-6585. 190886
Mathai CV; Watson Jr JG; Rogers CF; Chow JC; Tombach I; Zwicker JO; Cahill T; Feeney P; Eldred R. (1990).
Intercomparison of ambient aerosol samplers used in western visibility and air quality studies. Environ
Sci Technol, 24: 1090-1099. 156741
Mayol-Bracero OL; Guyon P; Graham B; Roberts G; Andreae MO; Decesari S; Facchini MC; Fuzzi S; Artaxo P.
(2002). Water-soluble organic compounds in biomass burning aerosols over Amazonia: 2 Apportionment
of the chemical composition and importance of the polyacidic fraction. J Geophys Res, 107. 045010
Mazzoleni LR; Zielinska B; Moosmuller H. (2007). Emissions of Levoglucosan, Methoxy Phenols, and Organic
Acids from Prescribed Burns, Laboratory Combustion of Wildland Fuels, and Residential Wood
Combustion. Environ Sci Technol, 41: 2115-2122. 098038
July 2009
A-345
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
McCormack MC; Breysse PN; Hansel NN; Matsui EC; Tonorezos ES; CurtirrBrosnan J; Williams DL; Buckley
TJ; Eggleston PA; Diette GB. (2007). Common household activities are associated with elevated
particulate matter concentrations in bedrooms of inner-city Baltimore pre-school children. Environ Res,
106: 148-155. 156745
Meng QY; Turpin BJ; Korn L; Weisel CP; Morandi M; Colome S; Zhang J; Stock T; Spektor D; Winer A; Zhang
L; Lee JH; Giovanetti R; Cui W; Kwon J; Alimokhtari S; Shendell D; Jones J; Farrar C; Maberti S.
(2005). Influence of ambient (outdoor) sources on residential indoor and personal PM2.5 concentrations:
analyses of RIOPA data. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 15: 17-28. 058595
Meng QY; Turpin BJ; Lee JH; Polidori A; Weisel CP; Morandi M; Colome S; Zhang JF; Stock T; Winer A. (2007).
How does infiltration behavior modify the composition of ambient PM2.5 in indoor spaces? An analysis of
RIOPA data. Environ Sci Technol, 41: 7315-7321. 091197
Meng QY; Turpin BJ; Polidori A; Lee JH; Weisel C> Morandi M; Colome S; Stock T; Winer A; Zhang J. (2005).
PM2.5 of ambient origin: estimates and exposure errors relevant to PM epidemiology. Environ Sci
Technol, 39: 5105-5112. 081194
Middlebrook AM; Murphy DM; Lee S"H; Thomson DS; Prather KA; Wenzel RJ; Liu D"Y; Phares DJ; Rhoads KP;
Wexler AS; Johnston MV; Jimenez JL; Jayne JT; Worsnop DR; Yourshaw I; Seinfeld JH; Flagan RC.
(2003). A comparison of particle mass spectrometers during the 1999 Atlanta Supersites project. J
Geophys Res, 108D7. 042932
Miguel AH; Eiguren-Fernandez A; Jaques PA; Froines JR; Grant BL; Mayo PR; Sioutas C. (2004). Seasonal
variation of the particle size distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and of major aerosol species
in Claremont, California. Atmos Environ, 38: 3241-3251. 123260
Mihaltan F; Munteanu I; Higbee C; Travers M; Hyland A; Cummings KM; Dresler C. (2006). Global air
monitoring study: a multi-country comparison of levels of indoor air pollution in different workplaces.
Results from Romania, May 2006. Pneumologie, 55: 156-160. 156761
Mikel DK. (2001). Quality assurance final report for the Southern Oxidant Study Atlanta Supersite Field
Experiment August 3 - September 1, 1999. 156762
Miller AL; Habjan MC; Park K. (2007). Real-time estimation of elemental carbon emitted from a diesel engine.
Environ Sci Technol, 41: 5783-5788. 156765
Miller JD; Dugandzic R; Frescura AM; Salares V. (2007). Indoor- and outdoor-derived contaminants in urban
and rural homes in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 57' 297-302. 156764
Molnar P; Bellander T; Sallsten G; Boman J. (2007). Indoor and outdoor concentrations of PM2.5 trace elements
at homes, preschools and schools in Stockholm, Sweden. J Environ Monit, 9' 348-357. 156774
Molnar P; Gustafson P; Johannesson S; Boman J; Barregard L; Sallsten G. (2005). Domestic wood burning and
PM sub(2.5) trace elements: Personal exposures, indoor and outdoor levels. Atmos Environ, 39: 2643"
2653. 156772
Molnar P; Johannesson S; Boman J; Barregard L; Sallsten G. (2006). Personal exposures and indoor, residential
outdoor, and urban background levels of fine particle trace elements in the general population. J Environ
Monit, 8: 543-551. 156773
Monkkonen P; Pai P; Maynard A; Lehtinen KE; Hameri K; Rechkemmer P; Ramachandran G; Prasad B;
Kulmala M. (2005). Fine particle number and mass concentration measurements in urban Indian
households. Sci Total Environ, 347: 131-147. 156775
Mwaiselage J; Moen B; Bratveit M. (2006). Acute respiratory health effects among cement factory workers in
Tanzania: an evaluation of a simple health surveillance tool. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 79' 49"56.
156789
Na K; Cocker DR. (2005). Organic and elemental carbon concentrations in fine particulate matter in residences,
schoolrooms, and outdoor air in Mira Loma, California. Atmos Environ, 39: 3325-3333. 156790
Naumova YY; Eisenreich SJ; Turpin BJ; Weisel CP; Morandi MT; Colome SD; Totten LA; Stock TH; Winer AM;
Alimokhtari S; Kwon J; Shendell D; Jones J; Maberti S; Wall SJ. (2002). Polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons in the indoor and outdoor air of three cities in the US. Environ Sci Technol, 36: 2552-2559.
026105
Naumova YY; Offenberg JH; Eisenreich SJ; Meng QY; Polidori A; Turpin BJ; Weisel CP; Morandi MT; Colome
SD; Stock TH; Winer AM; Alimokhtari S; Kwon J; Maberti S; Shendell D; Jones J; Farrar C. (2003).
Gas/particle distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in coupled outdoor/indoor atmospheres.
Atmos Environ, 37: 703-719. 089213
Nerriere E; Zmirou-Navier D; Blanchard O; Momas I; Laclner J; Le Moullec Y; Personnaz M"B; Lameloise P;
Delmas V; Target A; Desqueyroux H. (2005). Can we use fixed ambient air monitors to estimate
population long-term exposure to air pollutants? The case of spatial variability in the Genotox ER study.
Environ Res, 97: 32-42. 089481
July 2009
A-346
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Nerriere E> Zmirou-Navier D; Desqueyroux P; Leclerc N> Momas L Czernichow P. (2005). Lung cancer risk
assessment in relation with personal exposure to airborne particles in four French metropolitan areas. J
Occup Environ Med, 47: 1211-1217. 088630
Neususs C> Weise D> Birmili W> Wex Hi Wiedensohler Ai Covert DS. (2000). Size-segregated chemical,
gravimetric and number distribution-derived mass closure of the aerosol in Sagres, Portugal during ACE"
2. Tellus B Chem Phys Meteorol, 52: 169-184. 156804
Ng SPi Kendall Mi Dimitroulopoulou C> Grossinho Ai Chen LC. (2005). PM2.5 exposure assessment of the
population in Lower Manhattan area of New York City after the World Trade Center disaster. Atmos
Environ, 39: 1979-1992. 155996
Nikasinovic Li Just J; Sahraoui Fi Seta Ni Grimfeld Ai Momas I. (2006). Nasal inflammation and personal
exposure to fine particles PM2.5 in asthmatic children. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 117: 1382-1388. 156807
NIOSH. (1996). NIOSH Method 5040 Issue 1 (Interim): Elemental Carbon (diesel exhaust). 156810
NIOSH. (1999). NIOSH Method 5040 Issue 3 (Interim): Elemental Carbon (diesel exhaust). 156811
Norris G> Larson Ti Koenig J; Claiborn C> Sheppard Li Finn D. (2000). Asthma aggravation, combustion, and
stagnant air. Thorax, 55: 466-470. 087104
Noullett Mi Jackson PLi Brauer M. (2006). Winter measurements of children's personal exposure and ambient
fine particle mass, sulphate and light absorbing components in a northern community. Atmos Environ,
40: 1971-1990. 155999
Ntziachristos Li Samaras Z. (2006). Combination of aerosol instrument data into reduced variables to study the
consistency of vehicle exhaust particle measurements. Atmos Environ, 40: 6032-6042. 116722
O'Neill MSi Jerrett Mi Kawachi Ii Levy Jli Cohen AJi Gouveia Ni Wilkinson Pi Fletcher Ti Cifuentes Li
Schwartz Ji with input from participants of the Workshop on Air Pollution and Socioeconomic
Conditions. (2003). Health, wealth, and air pollution: advancing theory and methods. Environ Health
Perspect, 111: 1861-1870. 090310
O'Neill MSi Loomis D; Borja Aburto VH; Gold D; Hertz-Picciotto I; Castillejos M. (2004). Do associations
between airborne particles and daily mortality in Mexico City differ by measurement method, region, or
modeling strategy?. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 14: 429-439. 087429
O'Neill MS; Loomis D; Borja-Aburto VH. (2004). Ozone, area social conditions, and mortality in Mexico City.
Environ Res, 94: 234-242. 055597
Offenberg JH; Naumova YY; Turpin BJ; Eisenreich SJ; Morandi MT; Stock T; Colome SD; Winer AM; Spektor
DM; Zhang J; Weisel CP. (2004). Chlordanes in the indoor and outdoor air of three U.S. cities. Environ
Sci Technol, 38: 2760-2768. 156821
Oglesby L; Kunzli N; Roosli M; Braun-Fahrlander C; Mathys P; Stern W; Jantunen M; Kousa A. (2000). Validity
of ambient levels of fine particles as surrogate for personal exposure to outdoor air pollution-results of
the European EXPOLIS-EAS study (Swiss Center Basel). J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 50: 1251-1261.
001832
Ogulei D; Hopke PK; Chalupa DC; Utell MJ. (2006). Modeling Source Contributions to Submicron Particle
Number Concentrations Measured in Rochester, New York. Aerosol Sci Technol, 41: 179-201. 119975
Ogulei D; Hopke PK; Wallace LA. (2006). Analysis of indoor particle size distributions in an occupied townhouse
using positive matrix factorization. Indoor Air, 16: 204-215. 156823
Olfert JS; Kulkarni P; Wang J. (2008). Measuring aerosol size distributions with the fast integrated mobility
spectrometer. J Aerosol Sci, 39: 940-956. 156004
Ou CQ; Hedley AJ; Chung RY; Thach TQ; Chau YE Chan KP; Yang U Ho SY; Wong CM; Lam TH. (2008).
Socioeconomic disparities in air pollution-associated mortality. Environ Res, 107: 237-244. 189955
Paatero P. (1997). Least squares foumulation of robust non-negative factor analysis. , 37: 23"35. 087001
Paatero P. (1999). The Multilinear Engine: A Table-Driven, Least Squares Program for Solving Multilinear
Problems, including the n-Way Parallel Factor Analysis Model. , 8: 854-888. 156835
Paatero P; Hopke PK; Song XH; Ramadan Z. (2002). Understanding and controlling rotations in factor analytic
models. , 60: 253-264. 156836
Pancras JP; Ondov JM; Zeisler R. (2005). Multi-element electrothermal AAS determination of 11 marker
elements in fine ambient aerosol slurry samples collected with SEAS-II. Anal Chim Acta, 538: 303-312.
098120
Pang Y; Eatough NL; Modey WKi Eatough DJ. (2002). Evaluation of the RAMS continuous monitor for
determination of PM2.5 mass including semi-volatile material in Philadelphia, PA. J Air Waste Manag
Assoc, 52: 563-572. 030353
Pang Y; Gundel LA; Larson T; Finn D; Liu L-JS; Claiborn CS. (2002). Development and evaluation of a personal
particulate organic and mass sampler. Environ Sci Technol, 36: 5205-5210. 037057
July 2009
A-347
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Parekh PP; Husain L. (1981). Trace element concentrations in summer aerosols at rural sites in New York state
and their possible sources. Atmos Environ, 15- 1717-1725. 156840
Park SS; Harrison D; Pancras JP; Ondov JM. (2005). Highly Time-Resolved Organic and Elemental Carbon
Measurements at the Baltimore Supersite in 2002. J Geophys Res, 110- D07S06. 156843
Park SS; Pancras JP; Ondov J; Poor N. (2005). A new pseudodeterministic multivariate receptor model for
individual source apportionment using highly time-resolved ambient concentration measurements. J
Geophys Res, 110: D07S15. 156844
Paschold H; Maciejewska B; Li WW; Morales H; Pingitore NE. (2003). Elemental analysis of airborne
particulate matter and cooling water in west Texas residences. Atmos Environ, 37- 2681-2690. 156847
Pekney NJ; Davidson CI; Bein KJ; Wexler AS; Johnston MV. (2006). Identification of sources of atmospheric PM
at the Pittsburgh supersite, part I- single particle analysis and filter-based positive matrix factorization.
Atmos Environ, 2' 411-423. 086115
Peters TM; Gussman RA; Kenny LC; Vanderpool RW. (2001). Evaluation of PM25 size selectors used in
speciation samplers. Aerosol Sci Technol, 34: 422-429. 017108
Peterson MR; Richards MH. (2002). Thermal-optical-transmittance analysis for organic, elemental, carbonate,
total carbon, and OCX2 in PM2.5 by the EPA/NIOSH method. Presented at Symposium on Air Quality
Measurement Methods and Technology, Pittsburgh. 156861
Petzold A; Kramer H; Schonlinner M. (2002). Continuous Measurement of Atmospheric Black Carbon Using a
Multi-angle Absorption Photometer. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 4- 78"82. 156863
Petaja T. (2006). Detection Efficiency of a Water-Based TSI Condensation Particle Counter 3785. Aerosol Sci
Technol, 40: 1090-1097. 156021
Phares DJ; Rhoads KP; Johnston MV; Wexler AS. (2003). Size -resolved ultrafine particle composition analysis
2. Houston. J Geophys Res, 108: 8420. 156866
Pitchford ML; Chow JC; Watson JG; Moore CT; Campbell DE; Eldred RA; Vanderpool RW; Ouchida P; Hering
SV; Frank NH. (1997). Prototype PM2.5 federal reference method field studies report - An EPA staff
report. 156872
Polidori A; Arhami M; Sioutas C; Delfino RJ; Allen R. (2007). Indoor/Outdoor relationships, trends, and
carbonaceous content of fine particulate matter in retirement homes of the Los Angeles Basin. J Air
Waste Manag Assoc, 57: 366-379. 156877
Poore MW. (2000). Oxalic acid in PM2.5 particulate matter in California. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 50: 1874"
1875. 012839
Pope CA III; Burnett RT; Thun MJ; Calle EE; Krewski D; Ito K; Thurston GD. (2002). Lung cancer,
cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. JAMA, 287: 1132-
1141. 024689
Poupard O; Blondeau P; Iordache V; Allard F. (2005). Statistical analysis of parameters influencing the
relationship between outdoor and indoor air quality in schools. Atmos Environ, 39: 2071-2080. 074025
Price M; Bulpitt S; Meyer MB. (2003). A comparison of PM10 monitors at a Kerbside site in the northeast of
England. Atmos Environ, 37: 4425-4434. 098082
Qin X; Prather KA. (2006). Impact of biomass emissions on particle chemistry during the California Regional
Particulate Air Quality Study. Int J Mass Spectrom, 258: 142-150. 156895
Ramachandran G; Adgate J; Pratt G; Sexton K. (2003). Characterizing indoor and outdoor 15 minute average
PM 2.5 concentrations in urban neighborhoods. Aerosol Sci Technol, 37: 33"45. 188454
Ramachandran G; Adgate JL; Pratt GC; Sexton K. (2003). Characterizing indoor and outdoor 15 minute average
PM 2.5 concentrations in urban neighborhoods. Aerosol Sci Technol, 37: 33"45. 190112
Rattigan OV; Hogrefe O; Felton HD; Schwab JJ; Roychowdhury UK; Husain L; Dutkiewicz VA; Demerjian KL.
(2006). Multi-year urban and rural semi-continuous PM25 sulfate and nitrate measurements in New
York state: Evaluation and comparison with filter based measurements. Atmos Environ, 40: 192-205.
115897
Rees SL; Robinson AL; Khlystov A; Stanier CO; Pandis SNSN. (2004). Mass balance closure and the Federal
Reference Method for PM2.5 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Atmos Environ, 38: 3305-3318. 097164
Reff A; Weisel CP; Zhang J; Morandi M; Stock T; Colome S; Winer A; Turpin BJ; Offenberg JH. (2007). A
functional group characterization of organic PM2.5 exposure: Results from the RIOPA study. Atmos
Environ, 41: 4585-4598. 156045
Reimann C; De Caritat P. (2000). Intrinsic flaws of element enrichment factors (EFs) in environmental
geochemistry. Environ Sci Technol, 34: 5084-5091. 013269
Rinehart LR; Fujita EM; Chow JC; Magliano K; Zielinska B. (2006). Spatial distribution of PM 2.5 associated
organic compounds in central California. Atmos Environ, 40: 290-303. 115184
July 2009
A-348
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Riojas-Rodriguez Hi Escamilla-Cejudo JA; Gonzalez-Hermosillo JA; Tellez-Rojo MM; Vallejo Mi Santos-Burgoa
Ci Rojas-Bracho L. (2006). Personal PM2.5 and CO exposures and heart rate variability in subjects with
known ischemic heart disease in Mexico City. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 16- 131-137. 156913
Robinson DLi Monro JMi Campbell EA. (2007). Spatial variability and population exposure to PM2.5 pollution
from woodsmoke in a New South Wales country town. Atmos Environ, 41' 5464-5478. 156054
Rojas-Bracho Li Suh HH; Catalano PJ; Koutrakis P. (2004). Personal exposures to particles and their
relationships with personal activities for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients living in Boston.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 54: 54:207-217. 054772
Romieu L Ramirez-Aguilar Mi Moreno-Macias Hi Barraza-Villarreal A> Miller Pi Hernandez-Cadena Li
Carbajal"Arroyo LA; Hernandez-Avila M. (2004). Infant mortality and air pollution: modifying effect by
social class. J Occup Environ Hyg, 46: 1210-1216. 093074
Rossner Pi Svecova V; Milcova A> Lnenickova Zi Solansky Ni Sram RJ. (2008). Seasonal variability of oxidative
stress markers in city bus drivers - Part I. Oxidative damage to DNA. , 642: 14-20. 156927
Rotko Ti Oglesby Li Kunzli Ni Carrer Pi Nieuwenhuijsen MJi Jantunen M. (2002). Determinants of perceived
air pollution annoyance and association between annoyance scores and air pollution (PM25, N02)
concentrations in the European EXPOLIS study. Atmos Environ, 36: 4593-4602. 037240
Rotko T> Oglesby Li Kunzli Ni Jantunen MJ. (2000). Population sampling in European air pollution exposure
study, EXPOLIS: comparisons between the cities and representativeness of the samples. J Expo Sci
Environ Epidemiol, 10: 355-364. 012118
Rupprecht & Patashnick Co. (2003). Innovative instrument for an ambient air particulate mass measurement
stadard. 157207
Russell Mi Allen DTi Collins DRi Fraser MP. (2004). Daily, seasonal and spatial trends in PM25 mass and
composition in southeast Texas. Aerosol Sci Technol, l: 14-26. 082453
Sabin LDi Kozawa Ki Behrentz Ei Winer AMi Fitz DRi Pankratz DVi Colome SDi Fruin SA. (2005). Analysis of
real-time variables affecting children's exposure to diesel-related pollutants during school bus commutes
in Los Angeles. Atmos Environ, 39: 5243-5254. 087728
Sabin LDi Lim JHi Stolzenbach KDi Schiff KC. (2005). Contribution of trace metals from atmospheric deposition
to stormwater runoff in a small impervious urban catchment. Water Res, 39: 3929-3937. 088300
Salma Ii Maenhaut Wi Ocskay Ri Raes N. (2005). Fine structure of mass size distributions in an urban
environment. Atmos Environ, 39: 5363-5374. 156937
Salma Ii Ocskay Ri Chi Xi Maenhaut W. (2007). Sampling artefacts, concentration and chemical composition of
fine water-soluble organic carbon and humic-like substances in a continental urban atmospheric
environment. Atmos Environ, 41: 4106-4118. 113852
Salma Ii Weidinger Ti Maenhaut W. (2007). Time-resolved mass concentration, composition and sources of
aerosol particles in a metropolitan underground railway station. Atmos Environ, 41: 8391-8405. 113850
Samet JMi Dominici Fi Curriero FCi Coursac Ii Zeger SL. (2000). Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in
20 US cities, 1987-1994. , 343: 1742-1749. 013132
Samson PJ. (1978). Ensemble trajectory analysis of summertime sulfate concentrations in New York State.
Atmos Environ, 12: 1889-1893. 156941
Samson PJ. (1980). Trajectory analysis of summertime sulfate concentrations in the northeastern United
States. , 19: 1382-1394. 073010
Sanderson EGi Farant JP. (2004). Indoor and outdoor polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in residences
surrounding a Soderberg aluminum smelter in Canada. Environ Sci Technol, 38: 5350-5356. 156942
Sarnat JAi Brown KWi Schwartz Ji Coull BAi Koutrakis P. (2005). Ambient gas concentrations and personal
particulate matter exposures: implications for studying the health effects of particles. , 16: 385-395.
087531
Sarnat JAi Schwartz Ji Catalano PJi Suh HH. (2001). Gaseous pollutants in particulate matter epidemiology:
confounders or surrogates?. Environ Health Perspect, 109: 1053-1061. 019401
Sarnat SEi Coull BAi Ruiz PAi Koutrakis Pi Suh HH. (2006). The influences of ambient particle composition and
size on particle infiltration in Los Angeles, CA residences. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 56: 186-196. 089166
Sarnat SEi Coull BAi Schwartz Ji Gold DRi Suh HH. (2006). Factors affecting the association between ambient
concentrations and personal exposures to particles and gases. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 649-654.
089784
Sarnat SEi Suh HHi Coull BAi Schwartz Ji Stone PHi Gold DR. (2006). Ambient particulate air pollution and
cardiac arrhythmia in a panel of older adults in Steubenville, Ohio. Occup Environ Med, 63: 700-706.
090489
July 2009
A-349
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Sax SN; Bennett DH; Chillrud SN; Ross J; Kinney PL; Spengler JD. (2006). A cancer risk assessment of inner-
city teenagers living in New York City and Los Angeles. Environ Health Perspect, 114- 1558-1566.
156950
Schauer JJ; Rogge WF; Hildemann LMJ Mazurek MA; Cass GR. (1996). Source apportionment of airborne
particulate matter using organic compounds as tracers. Atmos Environ, 30- 3837-3855. 051162
Scheepers PT; Micka V; Muzyka V; Anzion R; Dahmann D; Poole J; Bos RP. (2003). Exposure to dust and
particle-associated 1-nitropyrene of drivers of diesel-powered equipment in underground mining. Ann
Occup Hyg, 47: 379-388. 156955
Schnelle-Rreis J; Sklorz M; Peters A; Cyrys J; Zimmermann R. (2005). Analysis of particle-associated semi-
volatile aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons in urban particulate matter on a daily basis. Atmos
Environ, 39: 7702-7714. 112944
Schwartz J. (2000). The distributed lag between air pollution and daily deaths. , 11: 320-326. 002470
Schwartz J; Sarnat JA; Coull BA; Wilson WE. (2007). Effects of exposure measurement error on particle matter
epidemiology: a simulation using data from a panel study in Baltimore, MD. J Expo Sci Environ
Epidemiol, 17: S2-S10. 090220
Shalat SL; Lioy PJ; Schmeelck K; Mainelis G. (2007). Improving estimation of indoor exposure to inhalable
particles for children in the first year of life. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 57: 934-939. 156971
Shao L; Yang S; Li H; Li W', Jones T; Sexton K; B,ruB, K; Li J; Zhao H. (2007). Associations between particle
physicochemical characteristics and oxidative capacity: An indoor PM10 study in Beijing, China. Atmos
Environ, 41: 5316-5326. 156973
Shilton V; Giess P; Mitchell D; Williams C. (2002). The relationships between indoor and outdoor respirable
particulate matter: meteorology, chemistry and personal exposure. Indoor Built Environ, 11: 266-274.
049602
Sidhu S; Graham J; Striebich R. (2001). Semi-volatile and particulate emissions from the combustion of
alternative diesel fuels. Chemosphere, 42: 681-90. 155202
Simons E; Curtin-Brosnan J; Buckley T; Breysse P; Eggleston PA. (2007). Indoor environmental differences
between inner city and suburban homes of children with asthma. J Urban Health, 84: 577-590. 156982
Smith TJ; Davis ME; Reaser P; Natkin J; Hart JE; Laden F; Heff A; Garshick E. (2006). Overview of particulate
exposures in the US trucking industry. J Environ Monit, 8: 711-720. 156990
Solomon P; Baumann K; Edgerton E; Tanner R; Eatough D; Modey W', Marin H; Savoie D; Natarajan S; Meyer
MB. (2003). Comparison of integrated samplers for mass and composition during the 1999 Atlanta
supersites project. J Geophys Res, 108: 8423. 156994
Solomon PA; Norris G; Landis M; Tolocka M. (2001). Chemical analysis methods for atmospheric aerosol
components. : . 156993
Solomon PA; Sioutas C. (2006). Continuous and semi-continuous methods for PM mass and composition. 17-23.
156995
Sorensen M; Daneshvar B; Hansen M; Dragsted LO; Hertel 0; Knudsen L; Loft S. (2003). Personal PM25
exposure and markers of oxidative stress in blood. Environ Health Perspect, 111: 161-165. 042700
Sorensen M; Schins RPF; Hertel O; Loft S. (2005). Transition metals in personal samples of PM25 and oxidative
stress in human volunteers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 14: 1340-1343. 083053
Sram R; Beskid O; Binkova B; Chvatalova I; Lnenickova Z; Milcova A; Solansky I; Tulupova E; Bavorova H;
Ocadlikova D. (2007). Chromosomal aberrations in environmentally exposed population in relation to
metabolic and DNA repair genes polymorphisms. , 620: 22"33. 188457
Sram RJ; Beskid O; Rossnerova A; Rossner P; Lnenickova Z; Milcova A; Solansky I; Binkova B. (2007).
Environmental exposure to carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons-"the interpretation of
cytogenetic analysis by FISH. Toxicol Lett, 172: 12-20. 192084
Srivastava A; Jain VK. (2007). A study to characterize the suspended particulate matter in an indoor
environment in Delhi, India. , 42: 2046-2052. 157004
Stanier CO; Khlystov AY; Chan WR; Mandiro M; Pandis SN. (2004). A Method for the In Situ Measurement of
Fine Aerosol Water Content of Ambient Aerosols: The Dry-Ambient Aerosol Size Spectrometer (DAASS).
Aerosol Sci Technol, 38: 215 - 228. 095955
Stein SW; Myrdal PB; Beck TJ; Gabrio BJ; Oberreit D; Hairston P. (2002). An evaluation of mass-weighted size
distribution measurements with the Model 3320 aerodynamic particle sizer. Aerosol Sci Technol, 36: 845"
854. 157008
Stohl A. (1996). Trajectory statistics-A new method to establish source-receptor relationships of air pollutants
and its application to the transport of particulate sulfate in Europe. Atmos Environ, 30: 579-587. 157014
July 2009
A-350
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Strand M> Hopke PKi Zhao W> Vedal Si Gelfand Ei Rabinovitch N. (2007). A study of health effect estimates
using competing methods to model personal exposures to ambient PM2.5. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol,
17: 549-558. 157018
Strand Mi Vedal Si Rodes Ci Dutton SJi Gelfand EWi Rabinovitch N. (2006). Estimating effects of ambient
PM25 exposure on health using PM2.5 component measurements and regression calibration. J Expo Sci
Environ Epidemiol, 16: 30-38. 089203
Stranger Mi Potgieter-Vermaak Si Van Grieken R. (2008). Characterization of indoor air quality in primary
schools in Antwerp, Belgium. Indoor Air, l: 454-4863. 190884
Stranger Mi Potgieter-Vermaak Si Van Grieken R. (2009). Particulate matter and gaseous pollutants in
residences in Antwerp, Belgium. Sci Total Environ, 1182-1192: 407. 190883
Subbalakshmi Yi Patti AFi Lee GSHi Hooper MA. (2000). Structural characterisation of macromolecular organic
material in air particulate matter using Py-GC-MS and solid state 13 C-NMR. J Environ Monit, 2' 561-
565. 157023
Subramanian Ri Khlystov AYi Cabada JCi Robinson AL. (2004). Positive and negative artifacts in particulate
organic carbon measurements with denuded and undenuded sampler configurations. Aerosol Sci Technol,
l: 27-48. 081203
Sorensen Mi Daneshvar Bi Hansen Mi Dragsted LOi Hertel Oi Knudsen Li Loft S. (2003). Personal PM2.5
exposure and markers of oxidative stress in blood. Environ Health Perspect, 111: 161-166. 157000
Sorensen Mi Loft Si Andersen HVi Raaschou-Nielsen Oi Skovgaard LTi Knudsen LEi Nielsen IVi Hertel O.
(2005). Personal exposure to PM25, black smoke and N02 in Copenhagen: relationship to bedroom and
outdoor concentrations covering seasonal variation. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 15: 413-422. 089428
Takahama Si Wittig AEi Vayenas DVi Davidson Cli Pandis SN. (2004). Modeling the diurnal variation of
nitrate during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study. J Geophys Res, 109: D16S06. 157038
Tanaka Si Yasushi Ni Sato Ni Fukasawa Ti Santosa SJi Yamanaka Ki Ootoshi T. (1998). Rapid and
simultaneous multi-element analysis of atmospheric particulate matter using inductively coupled plasma
mass spectrometry with laser ablation sample introduction. J Anal At Spectrom, 13: 135-140. 157041
Tang C-Si Chang L"Ti Lee H"Ci Chan C-C. (2007). Effects of personal particulate matter on peak expiratory flow
rate of asthmatic children. Sci Total Environ, 382: 43-51. 091269
Tatum Vi Ray AEi Rovell-Rixx D. (2002). Performance of the RespiCon personal aerosol sampler in forest
products industry workplaces. AIHA J, 63: 311-316. 157046
Thomaidis NSi Bakeasa EBi Siskos PA. (2003). Characterization of lead, cadmium, arsenic and nickel in PM25
particles in the Athens atmosphere, Greece. Chemosphere, 52: 959-966. 044193
Thornburg JWi Stevens CD; Williams RW; Rodes CE; Lawless PA. (2004). A pilot study of the influence of
residential HAC duty cycle on indoor air quality. Atmos Environ, 38: 1567-1577. 157052
Toivola Mi Aim Si Reponen Ti Kolari Si Nevalainen A. (2002). Personal exposures and microenvironmental
concentrations of particles and bioaerosols. J Environ Monit, 4- 166-174. 026571
Tolbert PEi KLeina Mi Peelb JLi Sarnata SEi Sarnata JA. (2007). Multipollutant modeling issues in a study of
ambient air quality and emergency department visits in Atlanta. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 24: 938"
945. 090316
Tolbert PEi Mulholland JAi Macintosh DLi Xu Fi Daniels Di Devine OJi Carlin BPi Klein Mi Dorley Ji Butler
AJi Nordenberg DFi Frumkin Hi Ryan PBi White MC. (2000). Air quality and pediatric emergency room
visits for asthma in Atlanta, Georgia. Am J Epidemiol, 151: 798-810. 001993
Tovalin Hi Valverde Mi Morandi MTi Blanco Si Whitehead Li Rojas E. (2006). DNA damage in outdoor workers
occupationally exposed to environmental air pollutants. Occup Environ Med, 63: 230-236. 091322
Tovalin"Ahumada Hi Whitehead Li Blanco S. (2007). Personal exposure to PM2.5 and element composition- A
comparison between outdoor and indoor workers from two Mexican cities. Atmos Environ, 41: 7401-7413.
190165
Trenga CAi Sullivan JHi Schildcrout JSi Shepherd KPi Shapiro GGi Liu LJi Kaufman JDi Koenig JQ. (2006).
Effect of particulate air pollution on lung function in adult and pediatric subjects in a Seattle panel
study. Chest, 129: 1614-22. 155209
Turpin BJi Weisel CPi Morandi Mi Colome Si Stock Ti Eisenreich Si Buckley B. (2007). Relationships of Indoor,
Outdoor, and Personal Air (RIOPA): Part II. Analyses of concentrations of particulate matter species.
157062
Tursic Ji Podkrajsek Bi Grgic Ii Ctyroky Pi Berner A> Dusek Ui Hitzenberger R. (2006). Chemical composition
and hygroscopic properties of size-segregated aerosol particles collected at the Adriatic coast of Slovenia.
Chemosphere, 63: 1193-1202. 157063
July 2009
A-351
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Urch B; Brook JR; Wasserstein D; Brook RD; Rajagopalan Si Corey Pi Silverman F. (2004). Relative
contributions of PM2.5 chemical constituents to acute arterial vasoconstriction in humans. Inhal Toxicol,
16: 345-352. 055629
Vallejo Mi Ruiz Si Hermosillo AGi Borja-Aburto VHi Cardenas M. (2006). Ambient fine particles modify heart
rate variability in young healthy adults. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 16: 125-130. 157081
Van Roosbroeck Si Wichmann Ji Janssen NAHi Hoek Gi Van Wijnen JHi Lebret Ei Brunekreef B. (2006). Long-
term personal exposure to traffic-related air pollution among school children, a validation study. Sci
Total Environ, 368: 565-573. 090773
Vaughn Di O'Brien Ti Roberts PTi Rice J. (2005). Comparison of integrated filter and semi-continuous
measurements of PM2.5 nitrate, sulfate, and carbon aerosols in the Speciation Trends Network (STN).
157089
Veltkamp PRi Hansen KJi Barkley RMi Sievers RE. (1996). Principal component analysis of summertime
organic aerosols at Niwot Ridge, Colorado. J Geophys Res, 101: 19,495-19,504. 081594
Venkatachari Pi Zhou Li Hopke Pi Schwab Ji Demerjian Ki Weimer Si Hogrefe Oi Felton Di Rattigan O. (2006).
An intercomparison of measurement methods for carbonaceous aerosol in the ambient air in New York
City. Aerosol Sci Technol, 40: 788-795. 105918
Verma DKi Kurtz LAi Sahai Di Finkelstein MM. (2003). Current chemical exposures among Ontario
construction workers. Appl Occup Environ Hyg, 18: 1031-1047. 157093
Villeneuve PJi Burnett RTi Shi Yi Krewski Di Goldberg MSi Hertzman Ci Chen Yi Brook J. (2003). Atime-
series study of air pollution, socioeconomic status, and mortality in Vancouver, Canada. J Expo Sci
Environ Epidemiol, 13: 427-435. 055051
Vinzents PSi Moller Pi Sorensen Mi Knudsen LEi Herte LQi Jensen FPi Schibye Bi Loft S. (2005). Personal
exposure to ultrafine particles and oxidative DNA damage. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 1485-1490.
087482
Virkkula Ai Ahlquist NCi Covert DSi Arnott WPi Sheridan PJi Quinn PKi Coffman DJ. (2005). Modification,
Calibration and a Field Test of an Instrument for Measuring Light Absorption by Particles. Aerosol Sci
Technol, 39: 68-83. 157097
Voorhees KJi Schulz WDi Kunen SMi Hendricks LJi Currie LAi Klouda G. (1991). Analysis of Insoluble
Carbonaceous Materials from Airborne Particles Collected in Pristine Regions of Colorado. J Anal Appl
Pyrol, 18: 189-205. 157101
Wallace L. (2005). Ultrafine particles from a vented gas clothes dryer. Atmos Environ, 39: 5777-5786. 157102
Wallace Li Williams R. (2005). Use of personal-indoor-outdoor sulfur concentrations to estimate the infiltration
factor and outdoor exposure factor for individual homes and persons. Environ Sci Technol, 39: 1707-1714.
057485
Wallace Li Williams Ri Rea Ai Croghan C. (2006). Continuous weeklong measurements of personal exposures
and indoor concentrations of fine particles for 37 health-impaired North Carolina residents for up to four
seasons. Atmos Environ, 40: 399-414. 088211
Wallace LAi Mitchell Hi O'Connor GTi Neas Li Lippmann Mi Kattan Mi Koenig Ji Stout JWi Vaughn BJi
Wallace Di Walter Mi Adams Ki Liu L-JS. (2003). Particle concentrations in inner-city homes of children
with asthma: the effect of smoking, cooking, and outdoor pollution. Environ Health Perspect, 111: 1265"
1272. 053553
Wan ECHi Yu JZ. (2006). Determination of sugar compounds in atmospheric aerosols by liquid chromatography
combined with positive electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr, 1107: 175-181. 157104
Wang X; Fu J; Bi X; Sheng G. (2006). Hospital indoor PM10/PM2.5 and associated trace elements in
Guangzhou, China. Sci Total Environ, 366: 124-135. 157108
Ward TJ; Noonan CW; Hooper K. (2007). Results of an indoor size fractionated PM school sampling program in
Libby, Montana. Environ Monit Assess, 130: 163-171. 157112
Waterman D; Horsfield B; Leistner F; Hall Ki Smith S. (2000). Quantification of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons in the NIST Standard Reference Material (SRM1649A) urban dust using thermal
Desorption GC/MS. Anal Chem, 72: 3563-3567. 157116
Waterman Di Smith Si Green Di Horsfield Bi Hall K. (2001). The application of a thermal desorption GCMS
technique for the organic analysis of airborne particulate matter. Adv Mass Spectrom, 14: 887-888.
157117
Watson JGi Chen LWi Chow JCi Doraiswamy Pi Lowenthal DH. (2008). Source apportionment: findings from
the U.S. Supersites Program. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 58: 265-288. 157128
Watson JGi Chow JC. (2001). Ambient air sampling. In Baron PA; Willeke K (Ed.),Aerosol measurement:
principles, techniques, and applications (pp. 821-844). New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 157123
July 2009
A-352
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Watson JG; Chow JC. (2002). Comparison and evaluation of in situ and filter carbon measurements at the
Fresno Supersite. J Geophys Res, 107. 037873
Watson JG; Chow JC; Chen LWA. (2005). Summary of organic and elemental carbon/black carbon analysis
methods and intercomparisons. Aerosol Air Qual Res, 5- 69—102. 157125
Watson JG; Chow JC; Frazier CA. (1999). X-ray fluorescence analysis of ambient air samples. In Landsberger,
S.; Creatchman, M. (Ed.),Elemental analysis of airborne particlesAmsterdam, The Netherlands' Gordon
and Breach Science Publishers. 020949
Watson JG; Chow JC; Shah JJ; Pace TG. (1983). The effect of sampling inlets on the PM-10 and PM-15 to TSP
concentration ratios. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 33- 114-119. 045084
Watson JG; Cooper JA; Huntzicker JJ. (1984). The effective variance weighting for least squares calculations
applied to the mass balance receptor model. Atmos Environ, 18- 1347-1355. 045693
Watson JG; Robinson NF; Lewis CW; Coulter CT; Chow JC; Fujita EM; Lowenthal DH; Corner TL; Henry RC;
Willis RD. (1997). Chemical mass balance receptor model version 8 (CMB) users manual. 157121
Watson JG; Turpin BJ; Chow JC. (1989). The measurement process- Precision, accuracy, and validity. • . 157119
Weber RJ; Orsini D; Daun Y; Lee Y-NJ Kotz PJ; Brechtel F. (2001). A particle-into-liquid collector for rapid
measurement of aerosol bulk chemical composition. Aerosol Sci Technol, 35- 718-727. 024640
Weber RJ; Orsini D; Duan Y; Baumann K; Kiang CS; Chameides W', Lee YN; Brechtel F; Klotz P; Jongejan P.
(2003). Intercomparison of near real time monitors of PM2. 5 nitrate and sulfate at the US
Environmental Protection Agency Atlanta Supersite. J Geophys Res, 108- 8421. 157129
Weisel CP; Zhang J; Turpin BJ; Morandi MT; Colome S; Stock TH; Spektor DM; Korn L; Winer AM; Kwon J;
Meng QY; Zhang L; Harrington R; Liu W', Reff A; Lee JH; Alimokhtari S; Mohan K; Shendell D; Jones J;
Farrar L; Maberti S; Fan T. (2005). Relationships of Indoor, Outdoor, and Personal Air (RIOPA): Part I.
Collection methods and descriptive analyses. , 130- 1-107. 157131
Welthagen W; Schnelle-Rreis J; Zimmermann R. (2003). Search criteria and rules for comprehensive two-
dimensional gas chromatography "time-of-flight mass spectrometry analysis of airborne particulate
matter. J Chromatogr, 1019- 233-249. 104056
Wenzel RJ; Liu DY; Edgerton ES; Prather KA. (2003). Aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometry during the
Atlanta Supersite Experiment- 2. Scaling procedures. J Geophys Res, 108- 8426. 157139
Westerdahl D; Fruin S; Sax T; Fine PM; Sioutas C. (2005). Mobile platform measurements of ultrafine particles
and associated pollutant concentrations on freeways and residential streets in Los Angeles. Atmos
Environ, 39: 3597-3610. 086502
Wheeler BW; Ben-Shlomo Y. (2005). Environmental equity, air quality, socioeconomic status, and respiratory
health: a linkage analysis of routine data from the Health Survey for England. J Epidemiol Community
Health, 59: 948-954. 089860
Wichmann J; Janssen NAH; Van Der Zee S; Brunekreff B. (2005). Traffic-related differences in indoor and
personal absorption coefficient measurements in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Atmos Environ, 39: 7384"
7392. 086240
Williams B; Goldstein A; Kreisberg N; Hering S. (2006). An In-Situ Instrument for Speciated Organic
Composition of Atmospheric Aerosols: Thermal Desorption Aerosol GC/MS-FID (TAG). Aerosol Sci
Technol, 40: 627-638. 156157
Williams R; Rea A; Vette A; Croghan C; Whitaker D; Stevens C; McDow S; Fortmann R; Sheldon L; Wilson H;
Thornburg J; Phillips M; Lawless P; Rodes C; Daughtrey H. (2008). The design and field implementation
of the Detroit Exposure and Aerosol Research Study. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, x: 1"17. 191201
Williams R; Suggs J; Rea A; Sheldon L; Rodes C; Thornburg J. (2003). The Research Triangle Park particulate
matter panel study: modeling ambient source contribution to personal and residential PM mass
concentrations. Atmos Environ, 37: 5365-5378. 053338
Wilson JG; Zawar-Reza P. (2006). Intraurban-scale dispersion modelling of particulate matter concentrations:
applications for exposure estimates in cohort studies. Atmos Environ, 40: 1053-1063. 088292
Wilson WE; Brauer M. (2006). Estimation of ambient and non-ambient components of particulate matter
exposure from a personal monitoring panel study. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 16: 264-274. 088933
Wilson WE; Mar TF; Koenig JQ. (2007). Influence of exposure error and effect modification by socioeconomic
status on the association of acute cardiovascular mortality with particulate matter in Phoenix. J Expo Sci
Environ Epidemiol, 17: S11-S19. 157149
Winkler PM; Steiner G; Vrtala A; Vehkamaki H; Noppel M; Lehtinen KEJ; Reischl GP; Wagner PE; Kulmala M.
(2008). Heterogeneous Nucleation Experiments Bridging the Scale from Molecular Ion Clusters to
Nanoparticles. , 319: 1374. 156160
July 2009
A-353
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Wittig AE; Takahama S; Khlystov AY; Pandis SN; Hering S; Kirby B; Davidson C. (2004). Semi-continuous
PM25 inorganic composition measurements during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study. Atmos Environ, 38-
3201-3213. 103413
Wojtyniak B; Rabczenko D; Stokwiszewski J. (2001). Does air pollution have respect for the socio-economic
status of people?. 090372
Wong CM; Ou CQ; Chan KP; Chau YE Thach TQ; Yang U Chung RY; Thomas GN; Peins JS; Wong TW;
Hedley AJ; Lam TH. (2008). The effects of air pollution on mortality in socially deprived urban areas in
Hong Kong, China. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 1189-1194. 157151
Wu C-F; Delfino RJ; Floro JN; Quintanai. (2005). Exposure assessment and modeling of particulate matter for
asthmatic children using personal nephelometers. Atmos Environ, 39: 3457-3469. 086397
Wu CF; Delfino RJ; Floro JN; Samimi BS; Quintana PJ; Kleinman MT; Liu LJ. (2005). Evaluation and quality
control of personal nephelometers in indoor, outdoor and personal environments. J Expo Sci Environ
Epidemiol, 15: 99-110. 157155
Wu CF; Jimenez J; Claiborn C; Gould T; Simpson CD; Larson T; Liu LJS. (2006). Agricultural burning smoke in
Eastern Washington: Part II. Exposure assessment. Atmos Environ, 40: 5379-5392. 179950
Wu J; M Winer A; J Delfino R. (2006). Exposure assessment of particulate matter air pollution before, during,
and after the 2003 Southern California wildfires. Atmos Environ, 40: 3333-3348. 157156
Xiao H-Y; Liu C-Q. (2004). Chemical characteristics of water-soluble components in TSP over Guiyang, SW
China, 2003. Atmos Environ, 38: 6297-6306. 056801
Yang H; Jian ZY; Hang Ho SS; Xu J; Wu WS; Chun HW; Wang X; Wang L. (2005). The chemical composition of
inorganic and carbonaceous materials in PM25 in Nanjing, China. Atmos Environ, 39: 3735-3749. 102388
Yang H; Li Q; Yu JZ. (2003). Comparison of two methods for the determination of water-soluble organic carbon
in atmospheric particles. Atmos Environ, 37: 865-870. 156167
Yang W; Sohn J; Kim J; Son B; Park J. (2009). Indoor air quality investigation according to age of the school
buildings in Korea. J Environ Manage, 90: 348-354. 190885
Yao X; Fang M; Chan CK; Ho KF; Lee SC. (2004). Characterization of dicarboxylic acids in PM25 in Hong Kong.
Atmos Environ, 38: 963-970. 102213
Yeh S; Small MJ. (2002). Incorporating exposure models in probabilistic assessment of the risks of premature
mortality from particulate matter. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 12: 389-403. 040077
Yip FY; Robins TG; Parker EA; Israel BA; Brake field-Caldwell W', Keeler GJ; Dvonch JTE. (2004). Personal
exposures to particulate matter among children with asthma in Detroit, Michigan. Atmos Environ, 38:
5227-5236. 157166
Yu KN; Cheung YP; Cheung T; Henry RC. (2004). Identifying the impact of large urban airports on local air
quality by nonparametric regression. Atmos Environ, 38: 4501-4507. 101779
Zanobetti A; Schwartz J. (2000). Race, gender, and social status as modifiers of the effects of PM10 on mortality.
J Occup Environ Med, 42: 469-474. 010198
Zanobetti A; Schwartz J; Dockery DW. (2000). Airborne particles are a risk factor for hospital admissions for
heart and lung disease. Environ Health Perspect, 108: 1071-1077. 011979
Zanobetti A; Schwartz J; Gold D. (2000). Are there sensitive subgroups for the effects of airborne particles?.
Environ Health Perspect, 108: 841-845. 012187
Zeka A; Zanobetti A; Schwartz J. (2006). Individual-level modifiers of the effects of particulate matter on daily
mortality. Am J Epidemiol, 163: 849-859. 088749
Zhang Q; Anastasio C. (2003). Free and combined amino compounds in atmospheric fine particles (PM2. 5) and
fog waters from Northern California. Atmos Environ, 37: 2247-2258. 157182
Zhang Q; Jimenez JL; Canagaratna MR; Jayne JT; Worsnop DR. (2005). Time- and size-resolved chemical
composition of submicron particles in Pittsburgh: Implications for aerosol sources and processes. J
Geophys Res, 110: 1-19. 157185
Zhao W; Hopke PK. (2004). Source apportionment for ambient particles in the San Gorgonio wilderness. Atmos
Environ, 38: 5901-5910. 100956
Zhao W; Hopke PK; Norris G; Williams R; Paatero P. (2006). Source apportionment and analysis on ambient
and personal exposure samples with a combined receptor model and an adaptive blank estimation
strategy. Atmos Environ, 40: 3788-3801. 156181
Zhao W; Rabinovitch N; Hopke PK; Gelfand EW. (2007). Use of an expanded receptor model for personal
exposure analysis in schoolchildren with asthma. Atmos Environ, 41: 4084-4096. 156182
Zheng M; Cass GR; Schauer JJ; Edgerton ES. (2002). Source apportionment of PM2.5 in the southeastern
United States using solvent-extractable organic compounds as tracers. Environ Sci Technol, 36: 2361"
2371. 026100
July 2009
A-3 54
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Zhou L; Hopke PE Liu W. (2004). Comparison of two trajectory based models for locating particle sources for
two rural New York sites. Atmos Environ, 38: 1955-1963. 157190
Zhu Y> Hinds WC; Krudysz M> Kuhn T> Froines J; Sioutas C. (2005). Penetration of freeway ultrafine particles
into indoor environments. J Aerosol Sci, 36^ 303-322. 190081
Zhu Y> Kuhn T> Mayo P; Hinds WC. (2005). Comparison of Daytime and Nighttime Concentration Profiles and
Size Distributions of Ultrafine Particles near a Major Highway. Environ Sci Technol, 39^ 2531-2536.
157191
Zollner I. (2007). Concentrations of Particulate Matter in Schools in Southwest Germany. Inhal Toxicol, 19^ 245"
249. 157192
July 2009
A-355
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Annex B. Dosimetry
B.1. Ultrafine Disposition
Table B-1. Ultrafine disposition in humans.
Reference Study Group Aerosol
Study Protocol
Observations
Mills et
Healthy
Carbon -
al.(2006,
nonsmokers
99mTc
088770)
(5 M, 5 F;
108 nm
21-24 yrs)
CMD
(CJa - 2.2)
Technegas
Generator
Moller et al.
Healthy
Carbon -
(2008)
nonsmokers
99mTc
(n - 9;
— 100 nm
50 ± 11 yrs)
CMD
Smokers
Technegas
(n - 10;
Generator
51 ± 10 yrs)
COPD patients
(n - 7;
69 ±10 yrs)
Lung activity in the lung was measured at
0,1, and 6 h post aerosol inhalation.
On avg, lung activity decreased 3.2 ± 0.7% during the first h and
1.2 ± 1.7% over the next 5 h. With 95.6% of the particles in the
lungs at 6 h post inhalation and no accumulation of radioactivity
detected over the liver or spleen, findings did not support rapid
translocation from the lungs into systemic circulation.
On two separate occasions, subjects
inhaled 100 mL aerosol boli to target front
depths of 150 and 800 mL into the lungs to
target the airways and alveoli, respectively.
Retention measured at 10 min, 1.5, 5.5, 24
and 48 h post inhalation. Isotope (99mTc)
leaching from particles assessed via filters
in saline, blood, and urine. 81mKr utilized to
assess ventilation.
Shallow airways boli - Total deposition in airways (shallow boli)
similar between groups. Pattern of deposition was significantly
more central in the healthy subjects which was thought due to
non uniform ventilation distribution in smokers and COPD patients
as visualized by gamma-camera scans. Airway retention after 1.5
h was significantly lower in healthy subjects (89 ± 6%) than
smokers (97 ± 3%) or COPD patients (96 ± 6%). At 24 and 48 h,
retention significantly remained higher in COPD patients (86 ± 6%
and 82 ± 6%) than healthy subjects (75 ± 10% and 70 ± 9%).
Deep alveolar boli -Total deposition in alveoli (deep boli)
significantly greater in smokers (64 ±11 %) and COPD patients
(62 ± 5%) than healthy subjects (50 ± 8%). Alveolar retention of
particles similar at all times between groups. For example, at 48 h,
97 ± 3% in healthy subject, 96 ± 3% in smokers, and 96 ± 2% in
COPD patients. Retention at 24 and 48 correlated with isotope
leaching, suggesting that the small amount of clearance primarily
reflected the disassociation of 99mTc from the particles with little
transport of particles from the lungs.
Wiebert et al. Subjects having Carbon- Technegas system was modified to reduce
(2006,
156154)
varied health
status (9M, 6F;
46-74 yrs)
6 healthy
5 asthmatic
4 smokers
99mTc
87 nm
CMD
((Jb - 1.7)
Technegas
Generator
leaching of 99mTc radiolabel from
particles. The avg tidal volume during
aerosol inhalation was 1.8 L (range 0.8 -
3.3). Activity in chest region measured at
0, 2, 24, 46, and 70 h after inhalation.
Leaching assessed in vitro and via urine
collection.
Lung function not significantly different between healthy and
affected lungs. The aerosol deposition fraction was 41 ± 10%.
Lung retention was 99 ± 3%, 99 ± 5%, and 99 ± 10% at 24,46,
and 70 h post inhalation. Cumulative in vitro leaching by 70 h was
2.6 ± 0.96%. Except for radiotracer leaching from particles
(1.0 ± 0.6% of initially deposited activity in urine by 24 h), there
was not significant clearance from the lungs by 70 h. Individual
leaching was not correlated with individual retention.
Note: Hyperlinks to the reference citations throughout this document will take you to the NCEA HERO database
(Health and Environmental Research Online) at http://epa. gov/hero. HERO is a database of scientific literature
used by U.S. EPA in the process of developing science assessments such as the Integrated Science Assessments
(ISA) and the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS).
July 2009
B-1
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference Study Group Aerosol
Study Protocol
Observations
Wiebert et al.
Healthy
Carbon -
(2006,
subjects (4M,
99mTc
157146)
5F; 56 ± 9 yrs)
34 nm
Asthmatics
CMD
(2M, 3F;
(tJB - 1.5)
59 ± 6 yrs)
Technegas
Control (1M;
Generator
50 yrs)
Slow deep aerosol inhalations with 10s
breath hold. Mean inhalation time of 6 min.
Control subject inhaled aerosol with loosely
bound radiolabel. Retention scans at 10
min, 60 min, 100 min, and 24 h post
inhalation. Leaching assessed in vitro and
via collection of blood and urine.
Avg deposition fraction of 60 ± 17% which was correlated with
tidal volume during aerosol inhalation (p - 0.01). Activity excreted
in urine over 24-h post inhalation was 51 % in the control subject
(high 99mTc disassociation) and 3.6 ± 0.9% of deposited activity.
In the blood of the control subject, activity was 30%, 31 %, and
5% of the deposited activity at 20 min, 80 min, and 24-h
(respectively), whereas it was only 0.9 ± 0.6%, 1.1 ± 0.4%, and
1.5 ± 0.5% the other 13 subjects at these times. Lung retention in
the control subject was 30% at 1-h and 18% at 24 h. In the
remainder of subjects, lung retention was approximately 100%
through 24 h.
Table B- 2. Ultrafine disposition in animals.
Reference Study Group
Aerosol
Study Protocol
Observations
Bermudez et
al. (2004,
189730)
Fischer 344 rats,
females (6 wks)
B3C3F1 mice,
females (6 wks)
Hamsters,
females (6 wks)
Ti02:1.29-1.44/ym
MMAD
(erg - 2.46-3.65), 21
nm primary particles
Animals exposed 6 h/day, 5
day/wk, for 13 weeks to 0.5, 2
and 10 mgfm3. Control animals
exposed to filtered air. Animals
sacrificed at 0, 4,13, 26, and 56
(49 for hamsters) postexposure.
Groups of 25 animals per species
and time point.
HO2 pulmonary retention half-times for the low-, mid-, and high-
exposure groups, respectively: 63,132, and 365 days in rats;
48, 40, and 319 days in mice; and 33, 37, and 39 days in
hamsters.
Burden of HO2 in lymph nodes increase with time postexposure
in mid- and high-dosed rats; in high-dosed mice; but was
unaffected in hamsters at any time or dosage group. In
high-exposure groups of mice, epithelial permeability remained
elevated (— 2 x control groups) out to 52 weeks without signs
of recovery. Epithelial permeability was 3-4x control in high
exposed rats through 4 weeks post exposure, but approached
control by 13 weeks. Epithelial permeability was unaffected in
all groups of hamsters.
Chen et al.
(2006,
087947)
Sprague-Dawley
male rats
(220 ± 20 g)
Polystyrene
1251 radiolabel
Ultrafine: 56.4 nm
Fine: 202 nm
Intratracheal instillation of
particles in healthy rats or those
pretreated with LPS (12 h before
particle instillation). Healthy rats
sacrificed between 0.5-2 h and at
24 or 48 h post-instillation. LPS
treated rats were sacrificed 0.5-2
h post-instillation.
In healthy rats, there were no marked differences in lung
retention or systemic distribution between the ultrafine and
fine particles. Results for healthy animals focused on ultrafine
particles which were primarily retained in lungs (72 ± 10% at
0.5-2 h; 65 ± 1 % at 1 day; 62 ± 5% at 5 days). Initially, there
was rapid particle movement into the blood (2 ± 1% at 0.5-2 h;
0.1 ± 0.1 % at 5 days) and liver (3 ± 2% at 0.5-2 h; 1 ± 0.1 %
at 5 days). At 1 day post-instillation, about 13% of the
particles where in the urine or feces. Following LPS treatment,
ultrafine accessed the blood (5 vs. 2%) and liver (11 vs. 4%) to
a significantly greater extent than fine particles.
Geiseretal. Wistar rats 20 Ti02 (22 nm CMD, 1.7 Rats exposed 1-h via endotracheal Distributions of particles among lung compartments followed
(2005,
087362)
Also included
in vitro study
adult males
(250 ± 10 g)
ag)
Spark generated
0.11 mg/m3
7.3 x 106
particles/cm3
tube while anesthetized and
ventilated at constant rate. Lungs
fixed at 1 or 24-h postexposure.
the volume distribution of compartments and did not differ
significantly between 1 and 24-h post-inhalation. On avg,
79.3 ± 7.6% of particles were on the luminal side of the
airway surfaces, 4.6 ± 2.6% in epithelial or endothelial cells,
4.8 ± 4.5% in connective tissues, and 11.3 ± 3.9% within
capillaries. Particles within cells were not membrane-bound.
Kapp et al.
(2004,
156624)
Charles River
rats
5 young adult
male
(250 ± 10 g)
Ti02 (22 nmCMD, 1.7
ag)
Spark generated
-Rats exposed 1-h via
endotracheal tube while
anesthetized and ventilated at
constant rate. Lungs fixed
immediately postexposure.
Of particles in tissues, 72% were aggregates of 2 or more
particles; 93% of aggregates were in round or oval shape
aggregates, 7% were needle-like. The size distribution of
particles in lung tissues (29 nm CMD, 1.7 erg) was remarkably
similar to the aerosol; the small discrepancy may have been due
to differences sizing techniques. A large 350 nm aggregate was
found in a type II pneumocyte, a 37 nm particle in a capillary
close to the endothelial cells, and a 106 nm particle within the
surface-lining layer close to the alveolar epithelium.
July 2009
B-2
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table B- 3. In vitro studies of ultrafine disposition.
Reference Animal
Particles
Study Protocol
Observations
Edetsberger
et al. (2005,
155759)
Human cervix
carcinoma cells
(HeLa cells)
Polystyrene spheres
(0.020 |jm)
Cells incubated with polystyrene
particles having negative surface
charges. Cell cultures were naive or
treated with Genistein or Cytochalasin
B (CytB) prior to particle application.
Genistein inhibits endocytotic
processes, expecially caveolae
internalization. CytB inhibits actin
polymerization and phagocytosis.
Particles translocated into cells by first measurement (~ 1
min after particle application) independent of treatment
group. In naive cells, agglomerates of 88-117 nm were
seen by 15-20 minutes and of 253-675 nm by 50-60
minutes after particle application. Intracellular aggregates
thought to be result from particle incorporation into
endosomes or similar structures. In treated cells, only a
small number of agglomerates (161-308 nm) were found
and only by 50-60 minutes. At 50-60 minutes, 90% and
98% of particles were in the 20-40 nm range in naive and
treated cells, respectively. Particles did not translocate into
dead cells, rather they attached to outside of the cell
membrane.
Geiser et al.
(2005,
087362)
Also included
inhalation
study
Porcine lung
macrophages (106
cell/mLuman red
blood cells (RBC; 8
x 106 cells/mL)
Fluorescent
polystyrene spheres
(0.078, 0.2, and
1 Mm)
Gold shheres
(0.025 |jm)
Cells cultured for 4 h with each sized
polystyrene spheres. RBC were
employed as a model of nonphagocytic
cells. Some macrophages cultures were
treated with cytochalasin D (cytD) to
inhibit phagocytosis. In addition, RBC
were also cultured with gold particles.
Of the non-cytD treated macrophages, 77 ± 15%,
21 ±11%, and 56 ± 30% contained 0.078, 0.2, and
1 |jm particles, respectively. CytD treatment of
macrophages effectively blocked the phagocytosis of 1 |jm
particles, but did not alter the uptake of the 0.078 and
0.2 |jm particles. Human RBC were found to contain 0.078
and 0.2 |jm polystyrene spheres as well as the 0.025 |jm
gold particles, which were not membrane bound. In
contrast, the RBC did not contain the larger 1 |jm
polystyrene spheres. Results suggest that ultrafine and fine
(0.078 and 0.2 |jm diameter) particles cross cellular
membranes by a non-endocytic (i.e. not involving vesicle
formation) mechanisms such as adhesive interactions and
diffusion.
Geys et al.
(2006,
155789)
Human alveolar
(A549) and
bronchial (Calu-3)
epithelial cellsRat
primary type II
pneumocytes
Amine- and
carboxyl-modified
fluorescent
polystyrene (46 nm)
Cells cultured in clear polyester
transwells with 0.4 or 3 |jm pores.
Monolayer considered "tight" when
< 1 % sodium fluorescein moved from
apical to basolateral compartment.
Particle translocation assessed in
transwells with and without cells. Cells
incubated with particles for 14-16 h to
assess translocation from apical to
basolateral compartment.
Without cells, 13.5% of carboxyl-modified particles passed
through the 0.4 |jm pores (n - 7) and 67.5% through 3 |jm
pores (n - 3). Movement of the amine-modified particles
was 4.2% through 0.4 |jm pores (n - 7) and 52.7%
through 3 |jm pores (n - 3). The integrity of the monolayer
was insufficient for translocation studies using the A549
cells (0.4 and 4 |jm pore size) and rat pneumocytes
(0.3 |jm pore). Using 0.4 |jm pores, there was no
detectable translocation through either Calu-3 or rat
pneumocyte monolayers. Using 3 |jm pores, —6% of both
particle types passed through the Calu-3 monolayer;
however, results were highly variable with no translocation
in 2 (of 5) and 3 (of 6) trials with carboxyl- or
amine-modified particles, respectively.
July 2009
B-3
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
B.2. Olfactory Translocation
Table B-4. Olfactory particle translocation.
Reference Study Group Aerosol
Study Protocol
Observations
DeLorenzo
(1970,
156391)
Squirrel monkeys Silver-coated colloidal
young males gold (50 nm)
(1 kg)
Intranasal instillation of 1 mL particle
suspension. Animals sacrificed at 0.25,
0.5,1, and 24-h after instillation.
Rapid movement (30-60 min) into olfactory bulbs. Within
30 min of being placed on nasal mucosa, particle
aggregates were seen in axoplasm of the fila olfactoria
Within 1 h, particles were in olfactory glomerulus.
Particles in the olfactory bulb were located preferentially
in mitochondria and not free in the cytoplasm.
Dorman et
al. (2001,
055433)
Crl: CD rats
Males (6 wks
old)
Soluble and insoluble
Mn particle types;
MMAD - 1.3-2.1 fjm;
GSD<2
Whole body exposure (6 h/day, 14
consecutive days) to 0, 0.03, 0.3, and
3 mg Mn/m3. Tissues analyzed in six
animals per concentration exposed to
soluble (MnS04) or insoluble (Mn304)
aerosols.
Increased Mn levels in olfactory bulb observed following
MnS04 of a 0.3 mg Mn/m3 and following Mn304 of 3 mg
Mn/m3. At 3 mg Mn/m3, Mn levels were significantly
greater in olfactory bulb (1.4-fold) and striatum (2.7-fold)
following soluble Mn04 than insoluble Mn304. Mn levels in
the cerebellum were unaffected following all exposures.
Dorman et
al. (2004,
155752)
Crl: CD rats
Males (6 wks
old)
Soluble and insoluble
Mn particle types;
MMAD - 1.5-2/ym;
GSD - 1.4-1.6
Whole body exposure (6 h/day, 5
days/wk, 13 wks) to MnS04 at 0, 0.01,
0.1, and 0.5 mg Mn/m3. Compared to
Mn phosphate (as hureaulite) exposure
of 0.1 mg Mn/m3. Brain Mn levels
assessed immediately following 90
days of exposure or 45 days
postexposure.
Relative to air, the insoluble hureaulite was significantly
increased at 90 days of exposure in the olfactory bulb, but
not striatum or cerebellum. The soluble Mn phosphate
showed a dose dependent increase in olfactory bulb Mn
levels at 90 days. At 0.1 mg Mn/m3, Mn levels following
Mn phosphate were significantly increased in the olfactory
bulb and striatum relative to hureaulite and air exposures.
At 45 days postexposure, relative to air, olfactory bulb Mn
levels only remained increased Mn phosphate group at 0.5
mg Mn/m3.
Elder et al.
(2006,
089253)
Fisher 344 rats
Males (200-250
Mn oxide ( — 30 nm
equivalent sphere with
3-8 nm primary
particles)
Spark generated
0.5 mg/m3
18 x 10e particles/cm3
Whole body inhalation exposure to
either filtered air or Mn oxide for 12
days (6 h/day, 5 days/wk) with both
nares open or Mn oxide for 2 days (6
h/day) with right nostril blocked.
Intranasal instillation in left nostril of
Mn oxide particles or soluble MnCl2
suspended in 30 |jL saline. Analyzed
Mn in the lung, liver, olfactory bulb, and
other brain regions.
After 12 day exposure via both nostrils, Mn in the
olfactory bulb increased 3.5-fold, whereas in the lung Mn
concentrations doubled; there were also increases in the
striatum, frontal cortex, and cerebellum. After the 2 days
exposure with the right nostril blocked, Mn accumulated in
the mainly in the left olfactory bulb (— 2.4-fold increase)
in to a lesser extent in the right olfactory bulb (1.2-fold
increase). At 24-h post instillation, the left olfactory bulb
contained similar amounts of the poorly soluble Mn oxide
(8.2 ± 0.7%) and soluble MnCh (8.2 ± 3.6%) as a
percent of the amount instilled.
Oberddrster
et al. (2004,
055639)
Fisher 344 rats
Males (14 wks;
284 ± 9 q)
,3C (36 nmCMD, 1.7
CTg)
Spark generated
Rats (n - 12, 3 per time point) exposed
to 160 jjg/m3 for 6 h in whole-body
chamber and sacrificed at 1, 3, 5, and 7
day postexposure. Lung, olfactory bulb,
cerebrum, and cerebellum removed for
,3C analysis. Tissue ,3C-levels were
determined by isotope ratio mass
spectroscopy and background corrected
for ,3C levels in unexposed controls
(n - 3).
At 1 day postexposure, the lungs of rats exposed to
ultrafine ,3C particles contained 1.34 ± 0.22 jjg of ,3C
(1.39 jjg/g-lung) following background corrected. By 7
days postexposure, the 13C concentration had decreased
to 0.59 jjg/g-lung. There was a significant and persistent
increase in 13C in the olfactory bulb of 0.35 jjg/g on day
1, which increased to 0.43 jjg/g by day 7. Day 1
concentrations of 13C in the cerebrum and cerebellum
were also significantly increased but the increase was
inconsistent, possibly reflecting translocation of particles
from the blood across the blood-brain barrier into brain
regions.
Persson et Sprague-Dawley "'ZnCly dissolved in 0.1 Rats: intransal (0.03//g Zn in 10//L) or Zn uptake in olfactory epithelium and transport along
al. (2003,
051846)
male rats (150 g) M HCI
Freshwater Pike
female (3 kg)
intraperitoneally (0.03 /yg Zn in
100 //L); autoradiography and y spec
at 1 day or 1, 3, or 6 weeks
postexposure.
Pike: instilled (0.12 /yg Zn in 10 //L) in
right or both olfactory chambers,
assayed 2 weeks postexposure
olfactory neurons to olfactory bulb. Zn continued into
interior of olfactory bulb and in rat went into anterior
olfactory cortex. Zn found bound to both cellular
constituents and cytosolic components. Some Zn bound to
metallothionein in olfactory mucosa and olfactory bulb.
July 2009 B-4 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference Study Group Aerosol
Study Protocol
Observations
Wang et al.
(2007,
156147)
CD-1 (ICR) mice
Rutile Ti02
21 and 80 nm
Anatase Ti02 155 nm
Twenty mice (n - 5 per group) exposed Rutile particles were observed to be column/fiber shaped,
0 or 0.01 g-Ti02 per mL Dl. Instilled whereas anatase was octahedral. Ti02 particles taken up
25 /jL each day for 5 days, then inhaled by olfactory bulb via the olfactory nerve layer, olfactory
10 //L every other day. Mice sacrificed ventricle, and granular cell layer of the olfactory bulb. Fine
after one month. Ti02 showed greater entry into the olfactory bulb
presumably due to aggregation of smaller rutile particles
that was not seen for the fine anatase particles.
Yu et al. Sprague-Dawley Stainless steel
(2003, male rats, 6 wks welding-fume
156171) old (218 ± 10 g) <0 5/ym
Whole body exposure 2 h/day for 1,15,
30, or 60 days
Low: 64 ± 4 mg/m3 (1.6 mg/m3 Mn)
High: 107 ± 6 mg/m3 (3.5 mg/m3 Mn)
Significant increases in cerebellum Mn at 15 - 30 days of
exposure.
Slight increases in Mn in substantia nigra, basal ganglia,
temporal cortex, and frontal cortex after 60 days.
Significant increase at 30 days in basal ganglia at low
dose. Authors suggested that pharmacokinetics and
distribution of welding fume Mn differs from pure Mn.
B.3. Clearance and Age
Table B-5. Studies of respiratory tract mucosal and macrophage clearance as a function.
Reference Animal
Particles
Study Protocol
Observed Effect(s)
NASAL AND TRACHEAL CLEARANCE
Ho et al. Human, Not applicable
(2001, males and
156549) females
Ninety subjects (47 M, 43 F; 52 ± 23 yrs)
between 11 and 90 years of age were
recruited to measure nasal saccharine
clearance and ciliary beat frequency.
Ciliary beat frequency (n - 90; r - -0.48, p
< 0.0001) and nasal mucociliary clearance
time (n - 43; r - 0.64,p < 0.001) were
correlated with subject age. Nasal clearance
times were significantly \p < 0.001) faster in
individuals under 40 years of age (9.3 ± 5.2
min) versus older subjects (15.4 ± 5.0
minutes). Results similar between males and
females.
Goodman et
al. (1978,
071130)
Humans,
males and
females
Radiolabed Teflon disks (1 mm
diameter, 0.8 mm thick)
Tracheal mucus velocity following delivery via
bronchoscope to the tracheal mucosa. Ten
young (2 M, 8 F; 23 ± 3 yrs) and ten elderly (2
M, 5 F; 63 ± 5 yrs) nonsmokers served as
control subjects. Measurements were also
made in young smokers, ex-smokers, and
individuals with chronic bronchitis.
Young nonsmokers had a tracheal mucus
velocity of 10.1 ± 3.5 mm/min which was
significantly faster than the velocity of
5.8 ± 2.6 observed in the elderly nonsmokers.
Whaley et al.
(1987,
156153)
Beagle Macroaggregated albumin99mTc
labelled
males and
females
Intratracheal instillation of 10- //I droplet of
labelled albumin in saline. Tracheal clearance
followed 25 minutes. Longitudinal measure
measurements in 5 males and 3 females when
young adults (2.8-3 yr), middle-aged (6.7-6.9
yr), and mature (9.6-9.8 yr). Additional 5
females and 3 males comprised immature
group (9-10 mo) and 4 males and 4 females
used as aged group (13-16 yr).
Tracheal mucus velocity significantly
\p < 0.05) greater in young (9.7 ± 0.6 [SE]
mm/min) and middle-aged (6.9 ± 0.5) groups
than in immature (3.6 ± 0.4), mature
(3.5 ± 0.8), and aged (2.9 ± 0.5) dogs.
July 2009
B-5
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference Animal
Particles
Study Protocol
Observed Effect(s)
Yeates et al. Humans, Radioaerosols 99mTc labelled
(1981, males and
095391) females
Tracheal mucus velocities compiled for 74
healthy non-smoking subjects (60 M, 14F;
10-65 yrs, mean 30 yrs) from prior studies.
Forty-two (32 M, 10 F) inhaled albumin in
saline droplets (6.2-6.5//m MMAD), Yeates et
al. (1975); twenty-two (21 M, 1 F) inhaled iron
oxide (4.2 /jm MMAD), Yeates et al. (1981 b);
and ten (7 M, 3 F) inhaled monodisperse iron
oxide aerosol (7.5 /jm MMAD), Leikauf et al.
(1981). Inhalations were via a mouthpiece with
an inspiratory flow of ~ 1 liter/sec.
A lognormal distribution of tracheal mucus
velocities was reported. Age did not appear to
affect velocities, e.g., 4.7 ± 2.5 mm/min in
18-24 yrs olds vs. 4.6 ± 3.2 mm/min in
individuals > 30 yrs of age. However, it
should be noted that only 2 subjects were
greater than 45 yrs of age and that the data
was complied from three studies using
differing experimental techniques. Rather
similar tracheal mucus velocities in males
(4.7 ± 3.0 mm/min) and females (4.9 ± 2.4
mm/min).
BRONCHI AND BRONCHIOLES CLEARANCE
Puchelle et
al. (1979,
006863)
Human,
males
7.4 fm MMAD99mTc labelled
resin
Mucociliary clearance measured for 1 h post
aerosol inhalation in 19 healthy non-smoking
males (21-69 yrs of age). Clearance measure
on two occasions in 16 individuals.
Negative correlation (r - -0.472,/; < 0.05)
between mucociliary clearance and age.
Younger subjects (n - 9; 21-37 yrs) had 1-h
clearance of 34 ± 14% which was
significantly greater than the 22 ± 8% found
in the older subjects (n - 5; > 54 yrs).
Separated by 5.4 wks (on avg), there was a
good correlation between repeated clearance
measurements (r - 0.65,/; <0.001)
Svartengren
et al. (2005,
157034)
Humans,
males and
females
6//m MMAD111ln labelled Teflon
Small airway clearance measured in five age
groups (~ 24 yrs, n - 13; 25-29 yrs, n - 8;
30-49 yrs, n - 7; 50-64, n - 9; > 65 yrs,
n - 9) of healthy subjects. Aerosol inhaled via
mouthpiece at extremely slow rate of 0.05 L/s.
Activity in lungs measured at 1 day, 2 days,
and 1, 2, and 3 wks post-exposure. Under the
presumption that most large airway clearance
was complete by 24 h, retention at 24 h was
normalized to 100%.
Large and small airway clearance slowed with
increasing age. Clearance correlated with age
at all times (r - -0.46 to -0.50, -0.55, -0.66,
and-0.70 at 1 day, 2 days, 1 wk, 2 wks, and
3 wks, respectively). Based on linear
regression, the clearance from 1 to 21 days
post-exposure was 47% in a 20 yr-old versus
23% in an 80 yr-old. Lung function was not a
significant predictor of clearance when age
considered.
Vastag et al. Humans, Monodisperseerythrocytes99mTc
(1985, males and labelled
157088) females
Clearance measured for 1-h post-inhalation in Clearance significantly associated with age.
eighty healthy (59 M, 21 F; 43 ±17 yrs) Based on linear regression, total mucociliary
subjects who had never smoked. Smokers and clearance at 1-h post-exposure was 46% in a
ex-smokers also studied. Aerosol inhalation not 20-yr-old versus 23% in an 80 yr-old. Similar
described. results for males and females.
ALVEOLAR CLEARANCE
Muhle et al.
(1990,
006853)
Fischer 3.5//m MMAD 85Sr labelled
344 rats polystyrene latex
Control animals compared across several Typical alveolar clearance half-time of 45
studies. Aerosol inhaled by short-term nose days in 5-month-old rats compared to 74 days
only exposure. Alveolar clearance determined in 23-month-old rats. Statistical significance
by exponential fit to thoracic activity measured of findings not proved,
over 75-100 days excluding the first 15 days
post-exposure.
July 2009 B-6 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Annex B References
Bermudez E; Mangum JB; Wong BA; Asgharian B; Hext PM; Warheit DB; Everitt JI. (2004).
Pulmonary Responses of Mice, Rats, and Hamsters to Subchronic Inhalation of Ultrafine
Titanium Dioxide Particles. , 77- 347-357. 189730
Chen OH; Xirasagar S; Lin H"C. (2006). Seasonality in adult asthma admissions, air pollutant levels,
and climate- a population-based study. J Asthma, 43- 287-292. 087947
DeLorenzo AJD. (1970). The olfactory neuron and the blood-brain barrier. In Taste and Smell in
Vertebrates (pp. 151-175). London- Churchill Livingstone. 156391
Dorman DC; McManus BE; Parkinson CU; Manuel CA; McElveen AM; Everitt JI. (2004). Nasal
Toxicity of Manganese Sulfate and Manganese Phosphate in Young Male Rats Following
Subchronic (13-Week) Inhalation Exposure. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 481-488. 155752
Dorman DC; Struve MF; James RA; Marshall MW; Parkinson CU; Wong BA. (2001). Influence of
particle solubility on the delivery of inhaled manganese to the rat brain: manganese sulfate and
manganese tetroxide pharmacokinetics following repeated (l4"day) exposure. Toxicol Appl
Pharmacol, 170: 79-87. 055433
Edetsberger M; Gaubitzer E; Valic E; Waigmann E; Kohler G. (2005). Detection of nanometer-sized
particles in living cells using modern fluorescence fluctuation methods. Biochem Biophys Res
Commun, 332: 109-116. 155759
Elder A; Gelein R; Silva V; Feikert T; Opanashuk L; Carter J; Potter R; Maynard A; Ito Y; Finkelstein
J; Oberdorster G. (2006). Translocation of inhaled ultrafine manganese oxide particles to the
central nervous system. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 1172-1178. 089253
Geiser M; Rothen-Rutishauser B; Kapp N; Schurch S; Kreyling W', Schulz H; Semmler M; Im Hof V;
Heyder J; Gehr P. (2005). Ultrafine particles cross cellular membranes by nonphagocytic
mechanisms in lungs and in cultured cells. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 1555-1560. 087362
Geys J; Coenegrachts L; Vercammen J; Engelborghs Y; Nemmar A; Nemery B; Hoet PHM. (2006). In
vitro study of the pulmonary translocation of nanoparticles A preliminary study. Toxicol Lett,
160: 218-226. 155789
Goodman RM; Yergin BM; Landa JF; Golinvaux MH; Sackner MA. (1978). Relationship of smoking
history and pulmonary function tests to tracheal mucous velocity in nonsmokers, young
smokers, ex-smokers, and patients with chronic bronchitis. Am Rev Respir Dis, 117: 205-214.
071130
Ho JC; Chan KN; Hu WH; Lam WE Zheng L; Tipoe GL; Sun J; Leung R; Tsang KW. (2001). The effect
of aging on nasal mucociliary clearance, beat frequency, and ultrastructure of respiratory cilia.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 163: 983-988. 156549
Kapp N; Kreyling W; Schulz H; Im Hof V; Gehr P; Semmler M; Geiser M. (2004). Electron energy loss
spectroscopy for analysis of inhaled ultrafine particles in rat lungs. Microsc Res Tech, 63: 298"
305. 156624
Mills NL; Amin N; Robinson SD; Anand A; Davies J; Patel D; de la Fuente JM; Cassee FR; Boon NA;
Macnee W; Millar AM; Donaldson K; Newby DE. (2006). Do inhaled carbon nanoparticles
translocate directly into the circulation in humans?. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 173: 426-431.
088770
Muhle H; Creutzenberg 0; Bellmann B; Heinrich U; Mermelstein R. (1990). Dust overloading of lungs:
investigations of various materials, species differences, and irreversibility of effects. , l: Slll"
S128. 006853
Oberdorster G; Sharp Z; Atudorei V; Elder A; Gelein R; Kreyling W; Cox C. (2004). Translocation of
inhaled ultrafine particles to the brain. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 437-445. 055639
Persson E; Henriksson J; Tallkvist J; Rouleau C; Tjalve H. (2003). Transport and subcellular
distribution of intranasally administered zinc in the olfactory system of rats and pikes.
Toxicology, 191: 97-108. 051846
Note: Hyperlinks to the reference citations throughout this document will take you to the NCEA HERO database
(Health and Environmental Research Online) at http://epa. gov/hero. HERO is a database of scientific literature
used by U.S. EPA in the process of developing science assessments such as the Integrated Science Assessments
(ISA) and the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS).
July 2009
B-7
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Puchelle E> Zahm J-M; Bertrand A. (1979). Influence of age on bronchial mucociliary transport. , 60-
307-313. 006863
Svartengren Mi Falk Ri Philipson K. (2005). Long-term clearance from small airways decreases with
age. Eur Respir J, 26- 609-615. 157034
Vastag Ei Matthys Hi Kohler Di Gronbeck Li Daikeler G. (1985). Mucociliary clearance and airways
obstruction in smokers, ex-smokers and normal subjects who never smoked. , 139- 93-100.
157088
Wang C. (2007). Impact of direct radiative forcing of black carbon aerosols on tropical convective
precipitation. Geophys Res Lett, 34' 5709. 156147
Whaley SLi Muggenburg BAi Seiler FA; Wolff RK. (1987). Effect of aging on tracheal mucociliary
clearance in beagle dogs. J Appl Physiol, 62: 1331-1334. 156153
Wiebert P; Sanchez-Crespo A; Falk R; Philipson K> Lundin A; Larsson Si Moller Wi Kreyling Wi
Svartengren M. (2006). No Significant Translocation of Inhaled 35-nm Carbon Particles to the
Circulation in Humans. Inhal Toxicol, 18: 741-747. 156154
Wiebert Pi Sanchez-Crespo Ai Seitz Ji Falk Ri Philipson Ki Kreyling WGi Moller Wi Sommerer Ki
Larsson Si Svartengren M. (2006). Negligible clearance of ultrafine particles retained in healthy
and affected human lungs. Eur Respir J, 28: 286-290. 157146
Yeates DBi Gerrity TRi Garrard CS. (1981). Particle deposition and clearance in the bronchial tree.
Ann Biomed Eng, 9: 577-592. 095391
Yu IJi Park JDi Park ES; Song KS; Han KT; Han JH; Chung YH; Choi BS; Chung KH; Cho MH. (2003).
Manganese Distribution in Brains of Sprague—Dawley Rats After 60 Days of Stainless Steel
Welding-Fume Exposure. , 24: 777-785. 156171
July 2009
B-8 DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Annex C. Controlled Human
Exposure Studies
Table C-1.
Cardiovascular Effects
Study
Pollutant Exposure
Findings
Reference:
Barregard et al.
Wood smoke
Particle Size: Session 1:
(2006, 091381) GMD 42 nm; Session 2.
Subjects: 13
healthy adults
Gender: 6 Ml 7
F
Age: 20-56 yrs
GMD 112 nm
Particle Number/Count:
Session 1: 180,000/cm3;
Session 2: 95,000/cm3
Concentration: Session
1: median: 279 //g|m3;
Session 2: median
243/yg/m3
Subjects exposed in two groups for 4 h to
filtered air, followed a wk later by a 4-h exposure
to wood smoke. Exposures conducted with two
25-min periods of light exercise. Other measured
combustion products:
Session 1: NO2 (0.08 ppm), CO (13 ppm),
formaldehyde (114/yg/m3), acetaldehyde
(75 /yglm3), benzene (30 /yglm3), 1,3-butadiene
(6.3/yg/m3);
Session 2: NO2 (0.09 ppm), CO (9.1 ppm),
formaldehyde (64/yg/m3), acetaldehyde
(40 /yglm3), benzene (20 /yglm3), 1,3-butadiene
(3.9/yg/m3).
Time to analysis: Immediately following
exposure as well as 3 and 20 h post-exposure.
Statistically significant increase in plasma factor VIII 20 h
post wood smoke exposure relative to filtered air. The factor
Vlllfvon Willebrand ratio in plasma was increased with wood
smoke relative to filtered air at 0, 3, and 20 h post-exposure.
Wood smoke exposure increased the urinary excretion of free
8-iso-prostaglandin2n relative to clean air 20 h post-exposure
(n - 9). These findings were more pronounced in session 1
than session 2 (similar mass concentration but higher number
concentration in session 1).
Reference:
Beckett et al.
(2005,156261)
Subjects: 12
healthy adults
Gender: 6 M/6
F
Age: 23-52 yrs
Ultrafine and fine zinc
oxide
Particle Size: UF:
< 0.1 /jm; Fine: 0.1-
1.0 /jm
Particle Number/Count:
UF: 4.6 x 107/cm3; Fine:
1.9 x 106|cm3
Concentration:
500/yg/m3
Subjects exposed via mouthpiece for 2 h during
rest to filtered air, ultrafine, and fine zinc oxide in
a randomized crossover study design. Exposures
were separated by at least 3 wks.
Time to analysis: Immediately following
exposure and 3, 6,11, 23, and 24 h after
exposure.
Exposure to ultrafine and fine zinc oxide did not affect HRV
(time and frequency domain parameters) relative to clean air
immediately following exposure, or at 3, 6,11, and 23 h
post-exposure. Exposure did not affect blood pressure
through 24 h post-exposure. No effects of exposure to either
fine or ultrafine zinc oxide observed on factor VII, von
Willebrand factor (vWf), tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA),
or fibrinogen. No effect of exposure observed on peripheral
blood cell counts or levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines.
DE
Concentration:
Reference:
Blomberg et al.
(2005.191991) 300/yglm3
Subjects: 15
older adults
(former
smokers) with
COPD
Age: 56-72 yrs
Subjects exposed for 1 h with intermittent
exercise to DE and filtered air in a randomized
crossover study design.
Time to analysis: 6 and 24 h post-exposure.
DE was not observed to affect blood levels of C-reactive
protein, fibrinogen, D-Dimer, prothrombin factor 1-2, or von
Willebrand factor activity at 6 and 24 h post-exposure.
Note: Hyperlinks to the reference citations throughout this document will take you to the NCEA HERO database
(Health and Environmental Research Online) at http://epa. gov/hero. HERO is a database of scientific literature
used by U.S. EPA in the process of developing science assessments such as the Integrated Science Assessments
(ISA) and the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS).
July 2009
C-1
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Findings
Reference:
Brauner et al.
(2007,188507)
Subjects: 29
healthy adults
Gender: 20
M/9 F
Age: 20-40 yrs
Urban traffic particles
Particle Number/Count:
6-700nm: 10,067|cm3
Concentration: PM2.6:
9.7/yg/m3; PM2.6 -10:
12.6/yg/m3
Subjects exposed to urban traffic particles and
filtered air for 24 h with and without two 90-min
periods of light exercise in a randomized
crossover study design. Concentrations of NOx
and NO were low and did not differ between
filtered and unfiltered exposures. CO
concentrations were higher with filtered air (0.35
and 0.41 ppm), while ozone concentrations were
lower with filtered air (12.08 and 4.29 ppb).
Time to analysis: 6 and 24 h after the start of
exposure.
An increase in DNA strand breaks and
formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase sites in peripheral
blood mononuclear cells were observed after 6 and 24 h of
exposure to urban particulates. The particle concentration at
the 57nm mode was shown to be the major contributor to
these effects.
Reference: Indoor air particles
Brauner et al. partic|e Number/Count:
(2008,156293) ^0.700 nm. 0 016)cm3
Subjects. 42 Concentration: Coarse:
healthy older g.4/yg/m3. Fine:
adults (21 12.6/yg/m3
couples)
Age: 60-75 yrs
Exposures consisted of two 48 h periods in the
home of each subject with or without the use of
a HEPA filter (randomized crossover design).
HEPA filters reduced coarse concentration from
9.4 to 4.6/yglm3, and fine concentration from
12.6 to 4.7 /yglm3. Concentrations of NO2 did
not differ between the 2 sessions (20 ppb).
Time to analysis: After the completion of each
48 h session.
The use of HEPA filters significantly improved microvascular
function (p - 0.04) after 48 h (reactive hyperemia-peripheral
arterial tonometry). Microvascular function was assessed
using a scoring system representing the extent of reactive
hyperemia. The reduction in PM concentration through the
use of HEPA filters did not significantly affect blood pressure
following the 48-h exposures. Lowering PM concentration did
not significantly affect inflammatory response markers in
peripheral venous blood (IL-6, TNF-n, C-reactive protein,
plasma amyloid A).
Urban traffic particles
Particle Number/Count:
Reference:
Brauner et al.
(2008,191966) 6.700 nm. 0,067|cm3
Subjects. 29 Concentration: PM2.6:
healthy adults g.7/yg,m3. PM26 ,o:
Gender: 20 M, 12.6/yglm3
9 F
Age: M avg 27
yrs, F avg 26
yrs
Subjects exposed to urban traffic particles and
filtered air for 24 h with and without two 90-min
periods of light exercise in a randomized
crossover study design. Concentrations of NOx
and NO were low and did not differ between
filtered and unfiltered exposures. CO
concentrations were higher with filtered air (0.35
and 0.41 ppm), while ozone concentrations were
lower with filtered air (12.08 and 4.29 ppb).
Time to analysis: 6 and 24 h after the start of
exposure.
Exposure to urban traffic particles was not observed to
affect microvascular function (digital peripheral artery tone)
at 6 or 24 h after the start of exposure. No difference in
various blood markers of coagulation, inflammation, or
protein oxidation (e.g., fibrinogen, platelet count, CRP, IL-6,
TNF- ~) were demonstrated between particle and filtered air
exposure.
DE
2002 Cummins B-series
(2007,155714) diese| engine (6BT5 gG6
Reference:
Carlsten et al.
Subjects: 13
healthy adults
Gender: 11
M/2 F
Age: 20-42 yrs
5.9 L) operating at load
Concentration: Fine PM:
100, 200/yg/m3
Subjects exposed for 2 h at rest to filtered air
and each of the two DEPs concentrations in a
randomized crossover study design. Exposures
were separated by at least 2 wks. Other diesel
emissions measured: NO2 (10-35 ppb), CO (0.7-
1.8 ppm).
Time to analysis: 3, 6, and 22 h after the start
of exposure.
No statistically significant changes in plasminogen activator
inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), vWf, D-dimer, or platelet count observed
3, 6, or 22 h following exposure to DE relative to filtered air.
Non-statistically significant increases in D-dimer, vWf, and
platelet count was observed at 6 h following the start of
exposure (4 h post-exposure). No diesel-induced increase in
C reative protein observed in relative to filtered air in
peripheral venous blood at 1 or 20 h post-exposure.
Reference:
Carlsten et al.
DE
2002 Cummins B-series
(2008,156323) diese| engine (6BT5 gG6
Subjects: 16
adults with
metabolic
syndrome
Gender: 10
M/6 F
Age: 25-48 yrs
5.9 L)
Concentration: Fine PM:
100, 200/yg/m3
Subjects exposed for 2 h at rest to filtered air
and each of the two DE particle concentrations
in a randomized crossover study design.
Exposures were separated by at least 2 wks.
Other diesel emissions measured: NO2 (30 ppb),
NO (1.69 ppm), CO (0.65 ppm).
Time to analysis: 3, 7, and 22 h after the start
of exposure.
At 5 h after the end of diesel exposure (fine particulate
concentration 200 //gfm3), the authors observed a significant
decrease in vWf in peripheral venous blood. No other changes
in thrombotic markers (vWf, D-dimer, PAI-1) were observed at
either concentration between 1 and 20 h post-exposure.
July 2009 C-2 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Findings
Reference:
Danielsen et al.
(2008,156382)
Subjects: 13
healthy adults
Gender: 6 Ml 7
F
Age: 20-56 yrs
Wood smoke
Particle Size: Session 1:
GMD 42 nm; Session 2:
GMD 112 nm
Particle Number/Count:
Session 1: 180,000/cm3;
Session 2: 95,000/cm3
Concentration: Session
1: median: 279 /yg/m3;
Session 2: median
243/yg/m3
Subjects exposed in two groups for 4 h to Exposure to wood smoke increased the mRNA levels of
filtered air, followed a wk later by a 4-h exposure hOGGI in PBMCs relative to filtered air 20 h after exposure.
to wood smoke. Exposures conducted with two
25-min periods of light exercise. Other measured
combustion products:
Session 1: NO2 (0.08 ppm), CO (13 ppm),
formaldehyde (114/yg/m3), acetaldehyde
(75 /yg/m3), benzene (30 /yg/m3), 1,3-butadiene
(6.3/yg/m3);
Session 2: NO2 (0.09 ppm), CO (9.1 ppm),
formaldehyde (64/yg/m3), acetaldehyde
(40 /yg/m3), benzene (20 /yg/m3), 1,3-butadiene
(3.9/yg/m3).
Time to analysis: 3 and 20 h post-exposure.
DNA strand breaks were shown to decrease in PBMCs 20 h
after wood smoke exposure.
Fine CAPs (Chapel Hill, NC) Exposures conducted for 2 h at rest to filtered CAPs exposure resulted in statistically significant reductions
Reference:
Devlin et al.
(2003, 087348) 40.5/yg/m3, Range: desi9
Concentration: Mean:
air and CAPs in a randomized crossover study
n.
Subjects: 10
healthy older
adults
Gender: 7 Ml 3
F
Age: Avg 66.9
yrs
21.2-80.3 /yg/m3 Time to analysis: Immediately following
exposure and 24 h post-exposure.
(p < 0.05) in time domain (PNN50) and frequency domain
(HF power) parameters relative to clean air immediately
following exposure. These relative decreases were still
apparent 24 h after exposure (p < 0.08).
Reference:
Fakhri et al.
Fine CAPs (Toronto)
Concentration: 127 ±
(2009,191914) 62/yg/m3 with and
Subjects: 50
adults (40
healthy, 10
asthmatic)
Gender: 24
M/26 F
Age: 19-48 yrs
without co-exposure to
ozone (114 ± ppb)
Exposures conducted through a facemask which
covered the subject's nose and mouth. Subjects
were exposed to CAPs, ozone, CAPs + ozone
and filtered air for 2 h at rest in a randomized
crossover study design.
Time to analysis: Every 30 min during
exposure, with the final measurement made
immediately prior to the end of the exposure.
Exposure to CAPs or ozone, alone or in combination, resulted
in no significant changes in HRV or blood pressure relative to
filtered air. However, a negative concentration response
relationship was reported between CAPs concentration with
co-exposure to ozone and SDNN, rMSSD, HF power and LF
power (statistically significant for LF power). Diastolic blood
pressure was observed to increase with exposure to CAPs +
ozone, but not with either pollutant alone. There was no
difference in response between asthmatics and healthy
subjects.
Reference:
Frampton et al.
(2006, 088665)
Subjects: 16
asthmatic
adults, 40
healthy adults
Gender:
Asthmatics: 8
M/8 F, Healthy:
20 M/20 F
Age: 18-40 yrs
Ultrafine elemental carbon
Particle Size: CMD —25
nm
Particle Number/Count:
10/yg/m3: -2.0 x
106/cm3; 25/yg/m3: -7.0
x 106/cm3; 50/yg/m3:
-10.8 x 106/cm3
Concentration: 10, 25,
and 50 /yg/m3
Study conducted using a randomized crossover
design with 2-h exposures. Asthmatics (n - 16)
exposed to filtered air and 10 /yg/m3. 12 healthy
adults exposed to filtered air and 10 /yg/m3 at
rest; 12 healthy adults exposed to filtered air, 10
and 25 /yg/m3 with intermittent exercise: 16
healthy adults exposed to filtered air and
50/yg/m3 with intermittent exercise. Exposures
were conducted via mouthpiece.
Time to analysis: Immediately following
exposure as well as 3.5, 21, and 45 h post-
exposure.
No effect of ultrafine particle exposure on leukocyte counts
or leukocyte expression of adhesion molecules observed in
healthy subjects exposed at rest to 10/yg/m3. Among healthy
adults exposed to ultrafine carbon during exercise, monocyte
expression of adhesion molecules CD54 and CD18 decreased
relative to filtered air immediately following exposure. An
ultrafine particle-induced decrease in PMN expression of
CD18was also observed 0-21 h post-exposure. Expression of
CD11b on monocytes and eosinophils was reduced following
exposure to ultrafine particles in exercising asthmatics
0-21 h post-exposure. A decrease in total leukocyte count
was observed following ultrafine particle exposure in
exercising healthy and asthmatic subjects.
July 2009 C-3 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Findings
Reference:
Gong et al.
(2004, 087964)
Subjects: 13
older adults
with COPD, 6
healthy older
adults
Gender: COPD:
5 Ml 8 F,
Healthy: 2 M/4
F
Age: COPD: avg
68 yrs, Healthy:
avg 73 yrs
Fine CAPs (Los Angeles)
Particle Size: 85% of
mass between 0.1 and
2.5 /jm
Concentration: Mean:
194/yg/m3,
135-229 //g/m3
Exposures to CAPs and filtered air (randomized
crossoveronducted for 2 h with intermittent light
exercise (four 15-min periods). Exposures were
separated by at least 2 wks.
Time to analysis: Immediately following
exposure as well as 4 and 22 h post exposure.
SDNN shown to decrease following CAPs exposure relative
to filtered air in healthy older adults (4-22 h post-exposure).
No CAPs-induced changes in HRV were observed in older
adults with COPD. Ectopic heart beats were observed to
increase slightly with CAPs relative to filtered air among
healthy subjects, but decreased among subjects with COPD.
Exposure to CAPs did not affect platelet or white blood cell
count, or levels of fibrinogen, vWF, or factor VII.
Reference:
Gong et al.
(2004, 055628)
Subjects: 12
adult
asthmatics, 4
healthy adults
Gender:
Asthmatics: 4
M/8 F, Healthy:
2 M/2 F
Coarse CAPs (Los Angeles) Exposures to CAPs and filtered air (randomized SDNN shown to decrease following CAPs exposure relative
Particle Size: 80% of
mass between 2.5 and
10 /jm, 20% of mass
<2.b/jm
Concentration: Mean:
157/yg|m3,
56-218 //g/m3
crossoveronducted for 2 h with intermittent light to filtered air in healthy adults (4-22 h post-exposure).
exercise (four 15-min periods). Exposures were
separated by at least 2 wks.
Time to analysis: Immediately following
exposure as well as 4 and 22 h post-exposure.
Decrease in PNN50 also observed in healthy adults at 4 h
post-exposure. No CAPs-induced decreases in HRV
demonstrated in asthmatics.
Asthmatics: avg
38 yrs, Healthy:
avg 32 yrs
Reference:
Gong et al.
(2008,156483)
Subjects: 14
adult
asthmatics, 17
healthy adults
Gender:
Asthmatics: 9
M/5 F, Healthy:
5 M/12 F
Ultrafine CAPs (Los
Angeles)
Particle Number/Count:
145,000/cm3, Range
39,000-312,0001cm3
Concentration: Mean-
100/yglm3, Range-
13-277 //g/m3
Subjects exposed for 2 h during intermittent
exercise (15-min periods) to both CAPs and
filtered air in random order. The first 7 subjects
underwent whole body exposure, while the
remaining subjects were exposed through a
facemask. Facemask exposures had higher
particle counts but lower particle mass than
whole body exposures. Exposures were
separated by at least 2 wks.
Time to analysis: Immediately following
exposure as well as 4 and 22 h post-exposure.
Relative to filtered air, exposure to ultrafine CAPs resulted in
a transient decrease in LF power 4 h post-exposure. This
effect of CAPs on HRV was not influenced by health status.
CAPs exposure was not observed to affect any other
measures of HRV, blood pressure, or blood markers of
inflammation or coagulation. There were no differences in
response observed between facemask and whole body
exposures.
Asthmatics:
34 ± 12 yrs,
Healthy:
24 ± 8 yrs
Reference:
Graff et al.
(2009,191981)
Subjects: 14
healthy adults
Gender: 8 M/6
F
Age: 20-34 yrs
Coarse CAPs (Chapel Hill,
NC)
Concentration: 89
± 49.5 /yglm3 (estimated
inhaled dose ~ 67% of
measured particle mass)
Subjects exposed for 2 h with intermittent
exercise (15-min periods) to coarse CAPs and
filtered air in a randomized crossover design.
Exposures were separated by at least 2 mos.
Time to analysis: 0-1 and 20 h post-exposure.
At 20 h post-exposure, tPA was observed to decrease by
32.9% from baseline (pre-exposure) per 10/yglm3 increase in
CAPs concentration \p - 0.01). D-dimer concentration
decreased 11.3% per 10/yg/m3, a change of marginal
statistical significance \p - 0.07). No other coarse CAPs-
induced changes in blood biomarkers of coagulation (e.g.,
vWF, factor VII, plasminogen, fibrinogen, or PAI-1) or
inflammation (e.g., CRP) were observed. At 20 h post-
exposure, overall HRV (SDNN) was shown to decrease by
14.4% relative to pre-exposure measurements per 10/yg/m3
increase in CAPs concentration. No other changes in HRV
were observed following exposure to coarse CAPs.
July 2009 C-4 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Findings
Reference:
Fine CAPs (Chapel Hill, NC) Subjects exposed to CAPs (n - 30) or filtered air The increase in blood fibrinogen following exposure to fine
Huang et al. Concentration:
(2003,087377) 23.1-311.1 //g/m3
Subjects: 38
healthy adults
Gender: 36
M/2 F
Age: Avg
26.2 ± 0.7 yrs
(n - 8) for 2 h with intermittent exercise
(subjects did not serve as their own controls).
Component data of CAPs was available for 37 of
the 38 subjects.
Time to analysis: 18 h after exposure.
CAPs reported by Ghio et al. (2000, 012140) was shown to
be associated with copper, zinc, and vanadium content in the
CAPs.
Reference:
Larsson et al.
(2007,189320)
Subjects: 16
healthy adults
Gender: 10
M/6 F
Age: 19-59 yrs
Traffic particles (road
tunnel)
Particle Size: PM2.6,
PMio; PM2.6 mass
constituted —36% of
PM10 mass
Particle Number/Count:
20-1,000 nm: 1.1 x
105/cm3, < 100 nm:
0.85 x 105/cm3
Concentration: PM2 e-
46-81 //g/m3; PMio-
130-206 //g/m3
Exposures were conducted for 2 h with
intermittent exercise in a room adjacent to a
busy road tunnel. Study used a randomized
crossover design with each subject also exposed
to normal air (control). Exposures were separated
by 3-10 wks. No exposures to filtered air were
conducted. Other traffic emissions measured: NO
(874//g/m3), NO? (230 //g/m3), CO (5.8 //g/m3
reported, likely 5.8 mg/m3).
Time to analysis: 14 h post-exposure.
No change in plasma levels of fibrinogen or PAI-1 observed
14 h post exposure.
Reference:
Lucking et al.
(2008,191993)
Subjects: 20
healthy adults
Gender: M
Age: 21 -44 yrs
DE
Protocol 1 (n — 8): idling
Deutz diesel engine
(F3M2011, 2.2 L, 500
rpm) using gas oil
Protocol 2 (n — 12): idling
Volvo diesel engine (TD45,
4.5 L, 4 cylinders, 680
rpm) using Gasoil E10
Particle Number/Count:
Protocol 1: 1.2 x 10e/cm3;
Protocol 2:1.26 x
10e/cm3
Concentration: Protocol
1: 348//g/m3, Protocol 2:
330//g/m3
In both protocols, exposures were conducted
with intermittent exercise (15-min periods) to DE
and filtered air in a randomized crossover design
with exposures separated by at least one wk.
Protocol 1 (n — 8): Exposures conducted for 2 h.
Other diesel emissions measured: NOx (0.58
ppm), NO2 (0.23 ppm), NO (0.36 ppm), CO (3.54
ppm), total hydrocarbon (2.8 //g/m3).
Time to analysis: 6 h post-exposure.
Protocol 2 (n -12): Exposures conducted for 1 h.
Other diesel emissions measured: NOx (2.78
ppm), NO2 (0.62 ppm), NO (2.15 ppm), CO (3.08
ppm), total hydrocarbon (1.58 //g/m3).
Time to analysis: 2 and 6 h post-exposure.
Thrombus formation was observed to increase with diesel 2
and 6 h post-exposure using an ex vivo perfusion chamber.
Both platelet-neutrophil and platelet-monocyte aggregates
increased relative to filtered air 2 h following exposure to
diesel (only evaluated in Protocol 2). Plasma concentrations
of soluble CD40L were also observed to increase with diesel.
Exposure to diesel was not shown to affect total leukocyte,
monocyte, or platelet counts.
DE
Idling Cummins diesel
(2009,191159) engjne (5 g L) using
Reference:
Lund et al.
Subjects: 10
healthy adults
Gender: 4 M/6
F
commercial No. 2 fuel
Particle Size: MMAD
0.10//m
Concentration:
e: 18-40 yrs 100//g/m3
Subjects exposed for 1 h with intermittent
exercise (15-min periods) to DE and filtered air in
a randomized crossover study design. Other
diesel emissions measured: NOx (4.7 ppm), NO2
(0.8 ppm), CO (2.8 ppm), total hydrocarbons (2.4
ppm).
Time to analysis: 30 min and 24 h post-
exposure.
Exposure to diesel resulted in an increase in MMP-9 plasma
concentration and activity as well as an increase in
endothelin-1 plasma concentration at both 30 min and 24 h
post-exposure.
Reference:
Lundback et al.
(2009,191967)
Subjects: 12
healthy adults
Gender: M
Age: 21-30 yrs
DE
Idling Volvo diesel engine
(TD45, 4.5 L, 4 cylinders,
680 rpm) using Gasoil E10
Particle Number/Count:
1.26 x 106/cm3
Concentration:
330//g/m3
Subjects exposed for 1 h with intermittent
exercise (15-min periods) to DE and filtered air in
a randomized crossover study design. Exposures
were separated by at least one wk. Other diesel
emissions measured: NOx (2.78 ppm), NO2 (0.62
ppm), NO (2.15 ppm), CO (3.08 ppm), total
hydrocarbon (1.58//g/m3).
Time to analysis: 10, 20, 30, and 40 min post-
exposure.
Diesel-induced increase in arterial stiffness (increases in
augmentation pressure and augmentation index, as well as
decrease in time to wave reflection) observed at 10 and 20
min post-exposure using radial artery pulse wave analysis. No
effect of diesel observed on carotid-femoral pulse wave
velocity which was assessed 40 min post-exposure, but not
at earlier time points. No effect of diesel observed on blood
pressure 10-30 min post-exposure.
July 2009 C-5 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Findings
Reference:
Mills et al.
(2005,188557)
Subjects: 30
healthy adults
Gender: M
Age: 20-38 yrs
DE
Idling 1991 Volvo diesel
engine (TD45, 4.5 L, 4
cylinders, 680 rpm)
Particle Number/Count:
1.2 x 106/cm3
Concentration:
300 /yglm3
Subjects exposed for 1 h with intermittent
exercise (15-min periods) to DE and filtered air in
a randomized crossover study design. Exposures
were separated by two wks. Other diesel
emissions measured: NO2 (1.6 ppm), NO (4.5
ppm), CO (7.5 ppm), total hydrocarbon (4.3 ppm),
formaldehyde (0.26/yg/m3).
Time to analysis: 2-4 h post exposure for 15
subject; 6-8 h post exposure for the other 15
subjects.
Forearm blood flow increase (induced by bradykinin,
acetylcholine, and sodium nitroprusside) was attenuated by
DE 2 and 6 h post exposure. A 6 mmHg increase in diastolic
blood pressure (p - 0.08) 2 h following exposure to DE was
observed relative to filtered air control. Bradykinin-induced
release of t-PA was attenuated by diesel exposure 6 h
post exposure. DE did not affect the release of t-PA 2 h
post-exposure. No diesel-induced changes in serum IL-6 or
TNF-n observed 6 h post-exposure.
Reference:
Mills et al.
(2007,091206)
Subjects: 20
older adults
with prior
myocardial
infarction
Gender: M
Age: 60 ± 1
yrs
DE
Idling 1991 Volvo diesel
engine (TD45, 4.5 L, 4
cylinders, 680 rpm) using
low sulfur gas-oil E10
Particle Size: Median
particle diameter 54 nm,
Range 20-120 nm
Particle Number/Count:
1.26 x 106/cm3
Concentration:
300/yg/m3
Subjects exposed for 1 h with intermittent
exercise (15-min periods) to DE and filtered air in
a randomized crossover study design. Exposures
were separated by at least two wks. Other diesel
emissions measured: NOx (4.45 ppm), NO2 (1.01
ppm), NO (3.45 ppm), CO (2.9 ppm), total
hydrocarbon (2.8 ppm).
Time to analysis: During exposure and 6-8 h
post-exposure.
A greater increase in exercise induced ST-segment depression
and ischemic burden was observed during exposure to DE
than clean air. No diesel-induced effects on vasomotor
dysfunction observed 6 h post-exposure. Bradykinin-induced
release of t-PA was attenuated by diesel exposure relative to
filtered air 6 h post-exposure. Effect of diesel on t-PA release
was not evaluated at earlier times post-exposure. No
diesel-induced changes in blood leukocyte counts or serum
C-reactive protein 6 h post-exposure.
Reference:
Mills et al.
(2008,156766)
Subjects: 12
adults with
coronary heart
disease, 12
healthy adults
Gender: M
Age: CHD:
59 ± 2 yrs,
Healthy:
54 ± 2 yrs
Fine CAPs (Edinburgh,
Scotland, UK)
Particle Size: Mean
1.23/ym
Particle Number/Count:
99,400/cm3
Concentration:
190 ± 37 /yglm3
Exposures conducted for 2 h with intermittent
exercise. Subjects exposed to CAPs and filtered
air using a randomized crossover design with
exposures separated by at least 2 wks.
Time to analysis: 2, 6-8, and 24 h post-
exposure.
CAPs exposure had no significant effect on vascular function
in healthy adults or adults with coronary heart disease 6-8 h
post-exposure (i.e., no change in forearm blood flow as
assessed using venous occlusion plethysmography). The
authors attributed this lack of response to a low
concentration of combustion-derived particles. Small increase
in blood platelet and monocyte concentration observed
following CAPs exposure. Exposure to CAPs did not affect
serum CRP concentration or total leukocyte or neutrophil
count.
Reference:
Peretz et al.
(2007,189082)
Subjects: 5
healthy adults
Gender: M
Age: 20-31 yrs
DE
2002 Cummins B-series
diesel engine (6BT5.9G6,
5.9 L); operating at 75%
of rated capacity
Concentration: Fine PM
50,100, 200/yg/m3
Subjects exposed for 2 h at rest to filtered air
and each of the three DE particle concentrations
in a randomized crossover study design.
Exposures were separated by at least 2 wks.
Other diesel emissions measured, 200 //gfm3
exposure: NO2 (23 ppb), NO (1.75 ppm), CO (1.58
ppm).
Time to analysis: 6 and 22 h after the start of
exposure.
PBMC expression of 10 genes involved in the inflammatory
response were observed to be significantly affected by
exposure to DE at the highest concentration tested (8
upregulated, 2 downregulated) 6 h after the start of
exposure. The expression of 4 genes (1 upregulated, 3
downregulated) associated with the inflammatory response
showed significant changes 22 h after diesel exposure.
PBMC expression of 5 genes involved in the oxidative stress
pathways showed significant changes at 6 h after the start
of diesel exposure at the highest concentration tested (4
upregulated, 1 downregulated). 7 genes involved in the
oxidative stress pathways showed significant changes at
22 h following exposure (4 upregulated, 3 downregulated).
July 2009 C-6 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Findings
Reference:
Peretz et al.
(2008,156854)
Subjects: 17
adults with
metabolic
syndrome, 10
healthy adults
Gender:
Metabolic
syndrome: 11
M/6 F, Healthy:
8 M/2 F
Age: Metabolic
syndrome: 20-
48 yrs, Healthy:
20-42 yrs
DE
2002 Cummins Bseries
diesel engine (6BT5.9G6,
5.9 L) using No. 2 undyed
on-highway fuel: operating
at 75% of rated capacity
Particle Size: Median
particle diameter 1.04/ym
Concentration: Fine PM
100, 200/yg|m3
Subjects exposed for 2 h at rest to both
concentrations of DE as well as filtered air in a
randomized crossover design. Exposures were
separated by at least 2 wks. Other diesel
emissions measured, 100 //gfm3 exposure: NO2
(16.5 ppb), NO (0.96 ppm), CO (0.51 ppm):
200 /yglm3 exposure: NO2 (24.7 ppb), NO (1.54
ppm), CO (0.89 ppm).
Time to analysis: Immediately following
exposure (within 30 min post exposure) and 3 h
from the start of exposure.
Exposure to 200 //gfm3 elicited a statistically significant
decrease in brachial artery diameter relative to filtered air
immediately following exposure. A smaller decrease in
brachial artery diameter was also observed following
exposure to DE at 100/yg/m3. Plasma levels of endothelin-1
were observed to increase following DE exposure
(200 /yglm3). The observed effects were more pronounced in
healthy subjects than in subjects with metabolic syndrome.
DE did not affect endothelium-dependent flow-mediated
dilatation. No effect of DE on blood pressure was
demonstrated immediately following exposure.
Reference:
Peretz et al.
(2008,156855)
Subjects: 13
adults with
metabolic
syndrome, 3
healthy adults
Gender:
Metabolic
syndrome: 8
M/5 F, Healthy:
3 M/0 F
Age: Metabolic
syndrome:
31-48 yrs,
Healthy: 24-39
yrs
DE
2002 Cummins B series
diesel engine (6BT5.9G6,
5.9 L) using No. 2 undyed
on-highway fuel: operating
at 75% of rated capacity
Concentration: Fine PM
100, 200/yg/m3
Subjects exposed for 2 h at rest to both
concentrations of DE as well as filtered air in a
randomized crossover design. Exposures were
separated by at least 2 wks. Other diesel
emissions measured, 100 //gfm3 exposure: NO2
(20.6 ppb), NO (0.95 ppm), CO (0.47 ppm):
200 /yglm3 exposure: NO2 (28.3 ppb), NO (1.63
ppm), CO (0.74 ppm).
Time to analysis: 1, 3, 6, and 22 h from the
start of exposure.
Exposure to 200 //gfm3 increased HF power and decreased
the LF/HF ratio 1h post-exposure: however, this effect was
not consistent across subjects. No effect of DE was observed
at later time points. Subjects with metabolic syndrome did
not experience greater changes in HRV than healthy subjects.
Reference:
Power et al.
(2008,191982)
Subjects: 5
adults with
mild-to-
moderate
allergic asthma
Gender: 1 M/4
F
Age: 28-51 yrs
Carbon and ammonium
nitrate particles
Concentration:
With co-exposure to
0.2ppm O3: 255/yg/m3,
Without co-exposure to
0.2ppm O3: 313/yg/m3
Subjects exposed for 4 h with intermittent
exercise (30-min periods) to filtered air, particles,
and particles + ozone in a crossover study
design. Exposures were separated by at least 3
wks.
Time to analysis: 3 h 40 min from the start of
exposure.
Time and frequency domain HRV parameters were not
affected by particle exposure relative to filtered air.
However, exposure to particles with ozone resulted in a
significant decrease in SDNN as well high and low frequency
power normalized to the difference between total and very
low frequency power.
July 2009 C-7 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Pollutant
Exposure
Findings
Reference:
Routledge et al.
(2006, 088674)
Subjects: 20
older adults
with coronary
artery disease,
20 healthy older
adults
Gender: CAD:
17M/3 F,
Healthy: 10
M/10F
Age: CAD:
52-74 yrs,
Healthy: 56-75
yrs
Ultrafine carbon
Particle Size: < 10-300
nm; mode at 20-30 nm
Concentration: Ultrafine
carbon: 50 //g|m3; SO2:
200ppb
Exposures conducted (head dome system) to
filtered air, ultrafine carbon, SO2, and ultrafine
carbon + SO7 for 1 h at rest using a randomized
crossover study design.
Time to analysis: Immediately following
exposure as well as 3 and 23 h post-exposure.
No PM-induced changes in HRV observed among subjects
with coronary artery disease. Among healthy subjects, small
increase in HRV (RR, SDNN, rMSSD, and LF power)
demonstrated immediately post-carbon exposure. Relative to
filtered air control, exposure to ultrafine carbon did not
significantly affect blood pressure in healthy adults or adults
with coronary artery disease 0-3 h post-exposure. Exposure
to ultrafine carbon, either alone or with S02, did not affect
plasma levels of fibrinogen or D-dimer at 3 or 23 h
post-exposure. Exposure to ultrafine carbon did not affect
peripheral blood leukocyte count or C-reactive protein levels 3
or 23 h post-exposure.
Reference:
Rundell and
Caviston (2008,
191986)
Subjects: 15
healthy college
athletes
Gender: M
Age: Avg 19.5
yrs
Gasoline emissions
2.5 hp gasoline engine
running 10 s each min
during exposure and in the
min prior to exposure
Particle Size: PM1.0
Particle Number/Count:
Trial 1: 336,730 ±
149,206/cm3;
Trial 2: 396,200 ±
82,564/cm3
Subjects were exposed twice to both clean air
and dilute gasoline exhaust during 6-min periods
of maximal exercise on a cycle ergometer. Clean
air exposures occurred first and were separated
by 3 days. Gasoline exhaust exposures were also
separated by 3 days, with the first occurring 7
days after the second clean air exposure. Other
emissions measured: CO (6.3 ± 3.4 ppm).
Time to analysis: 6 min
There was no difference in total work done (kJ) between the
clean air exposures or between the clean air exposures and
the first exposure to gasoline exhaust. However, the second
gasoline exhaust exposure was demonstrated to significantly
decrease work accumulated over the 6min exercise period
compared with either of the other exposure conditions (p <
0.01).
Reference:
Samet et al.
(2007,156940)
Subjects:
Ultrafine CAPs:
20 healthy
adults, Coarse
CAPs: 14
healthy adults
Gender:
Ultrafine CAPs:
11 M/9 F,
Coarse CAPs: 8
M/6 F
Age: Ultrafine
CAPs: 18-35
yrs, Coarse
CAPs: 18-35
yrs
CAPs (Chapel Hill, NC)
Particle Size: Ultrafine
0.049 ± 0.009 /jm;
Coarse 3.59 ± 0.58/ym
Concentration: Ultrafine
47.0 ± 20.2/yg|m3:
Coarse 89.0 ± 49.5/yg/m3
Preliminary report comparing effects of
controlled exposures to coarse, fine, and
ultrafine CAPs among healthy adults (3 separate
studies). A randomized crossover design was
used in evaluating effects of coarse CAPs
(n — 14) and ultrafine CAPs (n-20) relative to
filtered air following 2-h exposures with
intermittent exercise. Results compared with
previous study of controlled exposure to fine
CAPs (Chapel Hill, NC) where subjects did not
serve as their own controls (Ghio et al., 2000,
012140).
Time to analysis: 0-20 h post-exposure.
Statistically significant decrease in SDNN observed 20 h
following exposure to coarse CAPs relative to filtered air.
Subjects in the high ultrafine CAPs group experienced a
decrease in SDNN based on an analysis of 24 h ambulatory
Holter monitoring relative to filtered air. Fine CAPs did not
significantly affect HRV. Increased levels of D-dimer observed
18 h following exposure to ultrafine CAPs. No CAPs-induced
changes in plasma factor VII, plasminogen, fibrinogen, PAI-1,
vWf, or t-PA. No CAPs-induced changes in C-reactive protein
levels were observed.
July 2009
C-8
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Findings
Reference:
Samet et al.
(2009,191913)
Subjects: 19
healthy adults
Gender: 10
M/9 F
Age: 18-35 yrs
Ultrafine CAPs (Chapel
Hill, NC)
Particle Size: <
0.16/ym
Particle Number/Count:
120,662 ± 48,232
particles/cm3
Concentration: 49.8 ±
20/yg/m3
Subjects exposed for 2 h with intermittent 15
periods of exercise to UF CAPs and filtered air
using a randomized crossover study design.
Time to analysis: Immediately following
exposure and 1 and 18 h post exposure.
UF CAPs exposure resulted in an increase in plasma
concentrations of D-dimer both immediately following
exposure (20.6% increase per 10E particles/cm3) as well as
18 h post-exposure (18.2% increase per 106 particles/cm3).
Plasma concentration of PAI1 also increased with UF CAPs,
although this increase was not statistically significant (24%
increase,/; - 0.1). No UF CAPs-induced changes observed in
plasma concentrations of tPA, vWF, CRP, fibrinogen,
plasminogen, or Factor VII. HF and LF power were both
observed to increase with UF CAPs exposure relative to
filtered air at 18 h post-exposure (41.8% and 36%,
respectively, per 106 particles/cm3 increase in UF CAPs). UF
CAPs expressed as mass concentration was not observed
have a statistically significant effect in HF total power. UF
CAPs was not observed to affect time domain measures of
HRV over 24 h. The QT interval was shown to decrease both
immediately following and at 18 h post exposure (not
statistically significant immediately following exposure).
Reference:
Shah et al.
Ultrafine elemental carbon Exposures conducted via mouthpiece for 2 h with Exposure to ultrafine carbon attenuated peak forearm blood
Particle Number/Count:
(2008,156970) 10.8 ± 1.7 x 10e/cm3
Subjects: 16 Concentration:
50/yg/m3
healthy adults
Age:
26.9 ± 6.9 yrs
intermittent exercise to filtered air and ultrafine
carbon in a randomized crossover study design.
Time to analysis: Immediately following
exposure as well as 3.5, 21, and 45 h post-
exposure.
flow after ischemia relative to filtered air 3.5 h
post-exposure. Venous nitrate levels were significantly lower
at 21 h following exposure to UF carbon compared with
filtered air exposure. PM exposure was not observed to
affect blood pressure relative to filtered air at times 0-45 h
post-exposure.
Reference: DE
Tornqvist et al. |d|ing 1 ggl Volvo diesel
(2007, 091279) engine (TD45i 4 5 L 4
Subjects: 15
healthy adults
Gender: M
Age: 18-38 yrs
cylinders, 680 rpm)
Concentration:
300 /yglm3
Subjects exposed for 1 h with intermittent
exercise (15-min periods) to DE and filtered air in
a randomized crossover study design. Exposures
were separated by at least two wks. Other diesel
emissions measured: NOx (4.44 ppm), NO2 (0.82
ppm), NO (3.62 ppm), total hydrocarbon (2.21
ppm).
Time to analysis: 24 h post-exposure.
DE was observed to significantly attenuate
endothelium-dependent vasodilation 24 h post-exposure.
Endothelium-independent vasodilation was not affected by
diesel exposure. Exposure to DE did not affect blood pressure
relative to filtered air 24 h after exposure. DE significantly
increased plasma levels of IL-6 and TNF-n 24 h following
exposure. Exposure to diesel resulted in an increase in total
antioxidant capacity of plasma relative to filtered air 24 h
post-exposure.
Reference:
Urch et al.
(2004, 055629)
Subjects: 24
healthy adults
Gender: 14
M/10 F
Age: 35 ±10
yrs
Fine CAPs (Toronto)
Concentration:
150 /yglm3 (range
101-257 //g/m3) with 120
ppb ozone
Exposures conducted through a facemask which CAPs + ozone exposure resulted in a significant decrease in
covered the subject's nose and mouth. Subjects
were exposed to CAPs + ozone and filtered air
for 2 h at rest in a randomized crossover study
design. Exposures were separated by at least 2
days.
Time to analysis: Immediately following
exposure.
brachial artery diameter immediately post-exposure (Brook et
al., 2002, 024987), which was demonstrated to be
associated with both the organic and elemental carbon
fractions of the CAPs.
Reference:
Urch et al.
(2005,081080)
Subjects: 23
healthy adults
Gender: 13
M/10 F
Age: 32 ± 10
yrs
Fine CAPs (Toronto);
Concentration:
150 /yglm3 (range
102-214/yg/m3) with 120
ppb ozone
Exposures conducted through a facemask which An increase in diastolic blood pressure of 6 mmHg was
covered the subject's nose and mouth. Subjects
were exposed to CAPs + ozone and filtered air
for 2 h at rest in a randomized crossover study
design.
Time to analysis: Every 30 min during
exposure, with the final measurement made
immediately prior to the end of the exposure.
observed at the end of CAPs + ozone exposure, which was
statistically different from the change in blood pressure
experienced during exposure to filtered air (1 mmHg). This
effect was associated with the organic fraction of PM2.6.
July 2009 C-9 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Pollutant
Exposure
Findings
Reference: Ultrafine elemental carbon
Zareba et al. Particle Size: Count
(2009,190101) me(|jan diameter 25 nm
Subjects: 24 Partic|e Number/Count:
2x10efcm3 (10//g/m3),
7x10efcm3 (25//g/m3)
Concentration: 10 //g/m3;
healthy adults
Gender: 12
M/12F
e: 18-40 yrs 25//g/m
Protocol 1 (n — 12, 6 M/6 F): Subjects exposed to
10 //g/m3 UF carbon and filtered air for 2 h at
rest in a randomized crossover design. Exposures
were separated by at least 2 wks.
Protocol 2 (n — 12, 6 M/6 F): Subjects exposed to
10 //g/m3, 25 //g/m3, and filtered air for 2 h with
intermittent exercise (15-min periods) in a
restricted randomized crossover design (all
subjects exposed to 10 //g/m3 before 25 //g/m3).
Exposures were separated by at least 2 wks.
Time to analysis (both protocols): Immediately
following exposure and 3.5 and 21 h post-
exposure.
Exposure to 10 //g/m3 at rest resulted in no change in HRV
frequency domain parameters relative to filtered air exposure.
Time domain parameters were observed to increase slightly
with UF carbon exposure (10 //g/m3 at rest), however, only
the increase in rMSSD was statistically significant \p -
0.032). Some trends toward less shortening of QT interval,
increase in ST segment, and increase in variability of
repolarization (variability of T wave complexity) were
observed with exposure to 10 //g/m3 at rest, none of which
were statistically significant.
In Protocol 2, exposure to 10 //g/m3 UF carbon was observed
to slightly increase HRV time domain parameters as was
demonstrated in Protocol 1. However, this was not observed
at the higher concentration (25 //g/m3). As with exposure at
rest, exposure to UF carbon during exercise was observed to
affect repolarization (reduction in QT duration and increase in
T-wave amplitude), although this effect was not statistically
significant.
Table C-2. Respiratory effects
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Findings
Reference: Alexis et al.
(2006, 088636)
Subjects: 9 healthy
adults
Gender: 3 M/6 F
Age: 18-35 yrs
Coarse fraction particles
(Chapel Hill, NC)
Heat-treated (biologically
inactive) and non-heated
particles
Particle Size: MMAD
5 //m
Concentration: 0.65 mg
per subject
Subjects were administered heat-treated PM2.6 Both heat-treated and non-heated coarse PM were
-io, non-heated PM2.6 -10, and 0.9% saline
(control) via nebulization in a randomized
crossover study design. Exposures were
separated by at least 1 wk.
Time to analysis: 2-3 h post-inhalation.
observed to increase neutrophil counts in induced
sputum 2-3 h post-inhalation. Biologically active PM
(non-heated) induced an increase expression of
macrophage TNF-a mRNA, eotaxin, and immune
surface phenotypes on macrophages (mCD14,
CD11b/CR3, and HLA-DR).
Reference: Barregard et
al. (2008,155675)
Subjects: 13 healthy
adults
Gender: 6 M/ 7 F
Age: 20-56 yrs
Wood smoke
Particle Size:
Session 1: geometric
mean diameter 42 nm,
Session 2: geometric
mean diameter 112 nm
Particle Number/Count:
Session 1: 180,000/cm3;
Session 2: 95,000/cm3
Concentration: Session
1: median 279//g/m3;
Session 2: median
243//g/m3
Subjects exposed in two groups for 4 h to
filtered air, followed a wk later by a 4-h
exposure to wood smoke. Exposures conducted
with two 25-min periods of light exercise.
Other measured combustion products:
Session 1: NO2 (0.08 ppm), CO (13 ppm),
formaldehyde (114//g/m3), acetaldehyde
(75 //g/m3), benzene (30 //g/m3), 1,3-butadiene
(6.3//g/m3);
Session 2: NO2 (0.09 ppm), CO (9.1 ppm),
formaldehyde (64 //g/m3), acetaldehyde
(40 //g/m3), benzene (20 //g/m3), 1,3-butadiene
(3.9//g/m3).
Time to analysis: Immediately following
exposure as well as 3 and 20 h post-exposure.
Relative to filtered air, exposure to wood smoke was
observed to increase levels of eNO 3 h post-exposure.
Serum Clara cell protein increased 20 h after wood
smoke exposure. Wood smoke was observed to
increase levels of malondialdehyde in breath
condensate immediately after as well as 20 h
post-exposure. Effects of wood smoke on eNO and
malondialdehyde levels were similar between the two
sessions of wood smoke exposure. However, serum
Clara cell protein was significantly increased with
wood smoke in session 1 (higher particle count) but
not in session 2.
Reference: Bastain et al.
(2003, 098690)
Subjects: 18 nonsmoking
adults with positive
allergy skin test to short
ragweed
Gender: 7 M/11 F
Age: 18-38 yrs
DEP
Isuzu diesel engine, 4
cylinder, 4JB1
Concentration: 0.3 mg in
200 //I saline
Subjects underwent nasal provocation
challenge (intranasal spray) with allergen and
either DEP or placebo (saline) in a randomized
crossover study design. Challenges were
separated by 30 days. This protocol was then
repeated 30 days after the last exposure.
Time to analysis: 24 h post-exposure and 4
and 8 days after exposure.
DEP significantly increased allergic responses to short
ragweed. Relative to allergen + placebo, allergen +
DEP increased allergen specific IgE 4days following
exposure, and increased IL-4 1 day post-exposure. The
enhancement of allergic response with DEP was
observed to be reproducible within subjects.
July 2009
C-10
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Findings
Reference: Beckett et al.
(2005,156261)
Subjects: 12 healthy
adults
Gender: 6 M/6 F
Age: 23-52 yrs
Ultrafine and fine zinc
oxide
Particle Size: UF:
< 0.1 /jm; Fine: 0.1-
1.0/ym
Particle Number/Count:
UF: 4.6 x 107/cm3; Fine:
1.9 x 10W
Concentration:
500/yg/m3
Subjects exposed via mouthpiece for 2 h during
rest to filtered air, ultrafine, and fine zinc oxide
in a randomized crossover study design.
Exposures were separated by at least 3 wks.
Time to analysis: 11 and 24 h after exposure.
No changes observed in neutrophil count in induced
sputum. No PM (zinc oxide)-induced changes in
respiratory symptoms observed 0-24 h post exposure.
Reference: Behndig et al.
(2006, 088286)
Subjects: 15 healthy
adults
Gender: 8 M/7 F
Age: 21-27 yrs
DE
Idling 1991 Volvo diesel
engine (TD45, 4.5 L, 4
cylinders, 680 rpm)
Particle Size: PMio;
majority of PM mass
made up of particles <
1 //m in diameter
Concentration:
100/yg/m3
Exposures conducted for 2 h with intermittent
exercise to both DE and filtered air in a
randomized crossover design. Exposures were
separated by at least 3 wks. Other diesel
emissions measured: NOx (1.8 ppm), NO2 (0.4
ppm), NO (1.3 ppm), CO (10.4 ppm), total
hydrocarbons (1.3 ppm).
Time to analysis: 18 h post-exposure.
Exposure to DE increased neutrophil and mast cell
numbers in bronchial mucosa at 18 h post-exposure.
Neutrophils, IL-8, and myeloperoxidase observed to
increase in bronchial lavage fluid following exposure
relative to filtered air. No inflammatory response
observed in the alveolar compartment. Exposure to DE
increased urate and reduced glutathione
bronchoalveolar lavage at 18 h post-exposure.
Reference: Blomberg et DE
al. (2005,191991) Concentration:
Subjects: 15 older adults 300 //gfm3
(former smokers) with
COPD
Age: 56-72 yrs
Subjects exposed for 1 h with intermittent
exercise to DE and filtered air in a randomized
crossover study design.
Time to analysis: 6 and 24 h post-exposure.
DE was not observed to affect levels of Clara cell
protein in peripheral blood at 6 and 24 h post-
exposure.
Reference: Bosson et al. DE
(2007,156286)
Subjects: 16 healthy
adults
Gender: 7 M/9 F
Age: 20-28 yrs
Subjects exposed to DE for 1 h followed 5 h The percentage of neutrophils and concentration of
Idling Volvo diesel engine
Concentration: PM
300/yg/m3 followed by
exposure to filtered air or
0.2 ppm ozone
later by a 2-h exposure to either filtered air or
ozone (0.2 ppm) using a randomized crossover
study design. All exposures were conducted
with subjects engaged in intermittent exercise.
Time to analysis: 18 h after second exposure
(filtered air or ozone).
myeloperoxidase in induced sputum (18 h
post-ozone/air exposure) was significantly higher
following diesel + ozone than diesel + air.
Reference: Bosson et al. DE
(2008,156287)
Subjects: 14 healthy
adults
Gender: 9 M|5 F
Age: 21-29 yrs
Idling 1991 Volvo diesel
engine (TD45, 4.5 L, 4
cylinders)
Concentration: PM
300/yg/m3 or filtered air
followed by exposure to
0.2 ppm ozone
Subjects exposed to DE or filtered air for 1 h
followed 5 h later by a 2-h exposure to ozone
(0.2 ppm) using a randomized crossover study
design. All exposures were conducted with
subjects engaged in intermittent exercise.
Other diesel emissions measured: NO2 (0.51
ppm), NO (1.65 ppm), total hydrocarbons (1.18
ppm).
Time to analysis: 24 h after the start of the
initial exposure.
Neutrophil and macrophage numbers in bronchial wash
were significantly increased 16 h following ozone
exposure when preceded by exposure to diesel,
compared to ozone exposure preceded by exposure to
filtered air.
Reference: Brauner et al.
(2009,190244)
Subjects: 29 healthy
adults
Gender: 20 M, 9 F
Age: M avg 27 yrs, F avg
26 yrs
Urban traffic particles
Particle Size: PM2.6,
PM2.6 -10
Particle Number/Count:
6-700 nm: 10,067|cm3
Concentration: PM2.6:
9.7/yglm3, PM2.6 -io:
12.6/yg/m3
Subjects exposed to urban traffic particles and
filtered air for 24 h with and without two
90-min periods of light exercise in a
randomized crossover study design.
Concentrations of NOx and NO were low and
did not differ between filtered and unfiltered
exposures. CO concentrations were higher with
filtered air (0.35 and 0.41 ppm), while ozone
concentrations were lower with filtered air
(12.08 and 4.29 ppb).
Time to analysis: 2.5, 6, and 24 h after the
start of exposure.
Epithelial membrane integrity and blood-gas barrier
permeability, assessed using pulmonary clearance of
"To-labeled diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid
(DTPA), was observed to increase with exercise, but
was not affected by exposure to urban particles (2.5 h
of exposure). Exposure to urban particles was not
shown to affect plasma or urine concentration of
Clara cell 16 protein at 6 and 24 h after the start of
exposure. No relationship between exposure and
pulmonary function was observed at 2.5 h.
Reference: Gilliland et al.
(2004,156471)
Subjects: 19 adults with
allergic rhinitis and
positive skin test to
ragweed, GSTM1 (14
null, 5 present): GSTT1 (9
null, 10 present): GSTP1
codon 105 variants (13
III, 6 l/V, 0 V/V)
Gender: 7 M/12 F
Age: 20-34 yrs
DEP
Isuzu diesel engine, 4
cylinder, 4JB1
Concentration: 0.3 mg
DEP in 300 //L saline
Subjects were challenged intranasal^ with
allergen and placebo (saline) as well as allergen
plus DEP in saline in a randomized crossover
design. Challenges were separated by at least
6 wks.
Time to analysis: 10 min, 24 h, and 72 h
post-challenge.
Subjects who were GSTM1 null or homozygous for
GSTP1 1105 wild-type allele experienced significantly
greater increase in nasal IgE and histamine with diesel
plus allergen compared to subjects with functional
GSTM1 or who were heterozygous for GSTP1
l/V(105).
July 2009 C-11 DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Findings
Reference: Gong et al.
(2004, 087964)
Subjects: 13 older adults
with COPD, 6 healthy
older adults
Gender: COPD: 5 Ml 8 F,
Healthy: 2 M/4 F
Age: COPD: avg 68 yrs,
Healthy: avg 73 yrs
Fine CAPs (Los Angeles)
Particle Size: 85% of
mass between 0.1 and
2.5/ym
Concentration: Mean:
194/yg/m3,
135-229 //g/m3
Exposures to CAPs and filtered air (randomized
crossover) for 2 h with intermittent light
exercise (four 15-min periods). Exposures were
separated by at least 2 wks.
Time to analysis: Immediately following
exposure as well as 4 and 22 h post exposure.
No CAPs-induced respiratory symptoms observed in
healthy older adults or older adults with COPD at 0,4,
or 22 h post exposure. Exposure to CAPs did not
significantly affect FVC or FEVi. CAPs exposure
caused a decrease in arterial oxygen saturation 4 h
post exposure which was more pronounced in healthy
older adults than in older adults with COPD. Exposure
to CAPs was not observed to affect the levels of
white blood cells, columnar epithelial cells, IL-6, or IL-
8 in induced sputum.
Reference: Gong et al.
(2004, 055628)
Subjects: 12 adult
asthmatics, 4 healthy
adults
Gender: Asthmatic: 4
M/8 F, Healthy: 2 M/2 F
Age: Asthmatic: avg 38
yrs, Healthy: avg 32 yrs
Coarse CAPs (Los
Angeles)
Particle Size: 80% of
mass between 2.5 and
10 /jm, 20% of mass
< 2.5/ym
Concentration: Mean:
157/yg/m3;
56-218 //g/m3
Exposures to CAPs and filtered air (randomized
crossover) for 2 h with intermittent light
exercise (four 15-min periods). Exposures were
separated by at least 2 wks.
Time to analysis: Immediately following
exposure as well as 4 and 22 h post-exposure.
No effect of CAPs exposure on spirometry or arterial
oxygen saturation was observed 0,4, or 22 h
post-exposure. No respiratory symptoms reported
0-22 h post-exposure in either healthy or asthmatic
adults. Sputum cell counts at 22 h post-exposure did
not differ between CAPs and filtered air.
Reference: Gong et al.
(2005,087921)
Fine CAPs (Los Angeles)
Concentration: CAPs:
Subjects: 18 older adults 200 /yg/m3; NO2: 0.4 ppm
with COPD, 6 healthy
older adults
Gender: COPD: 9 M/9 F,
Healthy: 2 M/4 F
Age: COPD: avg 72 yrs,
Healthy: avg 68 yrs
Each subject was exposed to CAPs, NO2, CAPs
+ NO2, and filtered air for 2 h with
intermittent exercise. Exposure order was not
fully counterbalanced as NO2 exposures were
conducted after the majority of the CAPs and
filtered air exposures had been completed.
Exposures were separated by at least 2 wks.
Time to analysis: Immediately following
exposure as well as 4 and 22 h post-exposure.
Exposure to CAPs was observed to decrease maximal
mid-expiratory flow and arterial oxygen saturation
relative to filtered air 4-22 h post-exposure. This
response was more pronounced in healthy older adults
than in older adults with COPD. Concomitant exposure
to NO2 did not enhance the response. No other
respiratory responses (symptoms, spirometry, sputum
cell counts) were affected by exposure to CAPs.
Reference: Gong et al.
(2008,156483)
Subjects: 14 adult
asthmatics, 17 healthy
adults
Gender: Asthmatics: 9
M/5 F, Healthy: 5 M/12 F
Age: Asthmatics:
34 ± 12 yrs,
Healthy:24 ± 8 yrs
Ultrafine CAPs (Los
Angeles)
Particle Number/Count:
145,000/cm3, Range
39,000-312,000/cm3
Concentration: Mean:
100/yg/m3, Range:
13-277 //g/m3
Subjects exposed for 2 h during intermittent
exercise (15-min periods) to both CAPs and
filtered air in random order. The first 7
subjects underwent whole body exposure,
while the remaining subjects were exposed
through a facemask. Facemask exposures had
higher particle counts but lower particle mass
than whole body exposures. Exposures were
separated by at least 2 wks.
Time to analysis: Immediately following
exposure as well as 4 and 22 h post-exposure.
No significant differences in respiratory symptoms
observed between filtered air and ultrafine CAPs
exposures. Individuals exposed to higher particle
counts tended to experience greater symptoms with
CAPs than with filtered air. An ultrafine CAPs-induced
decrease in arterial oxygen saturation (0.5%) was
observed at 0,4, and 22 h post-exposure. A decrease
in FEVi (2%) was also observed 22 h post-exposure
relative to filtered air. Responses were not
significantly different between healthy and asthmatic
adults. CAPs exposure was not observed to affect
total sputum cell counts or cytokine levels. There
were no differences in response observed between
facemask and whole body exposures.
Reference: Graff et al. Coarse CAPs (Chapel I
(2009,191981) NC)
Subjects: 14 healthy
adults
Gender: 8 M/6 F
Age: 20-34 yrs
Concentration: 89
± 49.5/yg/m3 (estimated
inhaled dose ~ 67% of
measured particle mass)
Subjects exposed for 2 h with intermittent
exercise (15-min periods) to coarse CAPs and
filtered air in a randomized crossover design.
Exposures were separated by at least 2 mos.
Time to analysis: 0-1 and 20 h post-exposure.
Pulmonary function (FVC, FEVi, and carbon moNOxide
diffusing capacity) was not affected by exposure to
coarse CAPs either immediately following exposure or
20 h post-exposure. A significant increase in percent
PMNs (10.7% increase per 10/yg/m3 coarse CAPs)
was observed in BAL fluid 20 h post-exposure.
Percent monocytes in BL fluid were slightly decreased
at 20 h post-exposure (2.0% decrease per 10/yg/m3
CAPs:p - 0.05). Total protein in BAL fluid was also
observed to decrease following CAPs exposure (1.8%
decrease per 10/yg/m3 CAPs). Markers of
inflammation in BAL and BL fluids including IL-6, IL-8,
and PGE2 were not affected by exposure to coarse
CAPs.
Reference: Huang et al. Fine CAPs (Chapel \
(2003,087377) NC)
Subjects: 38 healthy Concentration:
adults 23.1-311.1/yg/m3
Gender: 36 M/2 F
Age: Avg 26.2 ± 0.7 yrs
Subjects exposed to CAPs (n - 30) or filtered
air (n - 8) for 2 h with intermittent exercise
(subjects did not serve as their own controls).
Component data of CAPs was available for 37
of the 38 subjects.
Time to analysis: 18 h after exposure.
The increase in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
neutrophils observed by Ghio et al. (2000, 012140)
following exposure to fine CAPs was shown to be
associated with iron, selenium, and sulfate content of
the CAPs.
July 2009
C-12
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Findings
Reference: Kongerud et
al. (2006,156656)
Subjects: 17 asthmatic
adults, 46 healthy adults
Gender: Asthmatics- 6
M/11 F, Healthy- 24
MI22F
Age: Asthmatics: avg 23
yrs, Healthy: avg 26 yrs
DEP
NIST 1650, heavy duty
diesel engine
Concentration:
Untreated and treated
with 0.1 ppm ozone (48
h); 300 /yg per nostril
DEP (with and without ozone pre-treatment)
were intranasal^ instilled, using the saline
vehicle as control. Subjects did not serve as
their own controls (not a crossover design).
Time to analysis: 4 and 96 h post-instillation.
Exposure to DEP was not observed to alter markers of
inflammation in nasal lavage fluid (e.g., cell counts,
IL-8, IL-6) at 4 or 96 h post-instillation.
Reference: Larsson et al.
(2007,189320)
Subjects: 16 healthy
adults
Gender: 10 M/6 F
Age: 19-59 yrs
Traffic particles (road
tunnel)
Particle Size: PM2.6,
PMio; PM2.6 mass
constituted —36% of
PM10 mass
Particle Number/Count:
20-1,000 nm: 1.1 x
105/cm3, < 100 nm:
0.85 x 105/cm3
Concentration: PM2 e-
46-81 /yg/m3; PMio-
130-206 //g/m3
Exposures were conducted for 2 h with
intermittent exercise in a room adjacent to a
busy road tunnel. Study used a randomized
crossover design with each subject also
exposed to normal air (control). Exposures
were separated by 3-10wks. No exposures to
filtered air were conducted. Other traffic
emissions measured: NO (874/yg/m3), NO2
(230 /yg/m3), CO (5.8 /yg/m3 reported, likely
5.8 mg/m3).
Time to analysis: 14 h post-exposure.
An increase in bronchoaveolar lavage fluid cell
number, lymphocytes, and alveolar macrophages were
observed 14 h after road tunnel exposure relative to
control. Traffic particulate exposure was not shown
to effect cytokine or adhesion molecule expression in
bronchial tissues. Respiratory symptoms were
reported to increase during exposure to road tunnel air
relative to pre exposure symptom ratings. Exposure to
road tunnel air was not shown to affect lung function.
Reference: Mudway et
al. (2004,180208)
Subjects: 25 healthy
adults
Gender: 16 M/9 F
Age: 19-42 yrs
DE
Idling 1991 Volvo diesel
engine (TD45, 4.5 L, 4
cylinders, 680 rpm)
Concentration: PMio
100 /yg/m3
Subjects exposed to DE and filtered air for 2 h
with intermittent exercise (15-min periods) in a
randomized crossover design. Exposures were
separated by at least 3 wks. Other diesel
emissions measured: NO2 (0.2 ppm), NO (0.6
ppm), CO (1.7 ppm), total hydrocarbons (1.4
ppm), formaldehyde (43.5 /yg/m3).
Time to analysis: 1 h after the start of
exposure, immediately following exposure, and
6 h post-exposure.
DE caused mild throat irritation in some subjects and a
significant increase in airways resistance (Raw) during
or immediately following exposure. No changes in
FEVi or FVC were observed following exposure to
diesel. Neutrophil numbers in the bronchial airways
tended to increase following exposure to DE, however,
this increase was highly variable between subjects
and did not reach statistical significance. Exposure to
DE did not affect levels of SOD or malondialdehyde in
the airways. An increase in levels of ascorbate and
GSH in nasal lavage fluid was observed 6 h following
exposure to DE.
Reference: Pietropaoli et
al. (2004,156025)
Subjects: 16 asthmatic
adults, 40 healthy adults
Gender: Asthmatic: 8
M/8 F, Healthy: 20 M/20
F
Age: 18-40 yrs
Ultrafine elemental carbon
Particle Size: CMD
— 25 nm
Particle Number/Count:
10/yg/m3: —2.0 x
10e/cm3; 25 /yg/m3:
-7.0 x 106/cm3;
50 /yg/m3: -10.8 x
106/cm3
Concentration: 10, 25,
and 50 /yg/m3
Study conducted using a randomized crossover
design with 2-h exposures. Asthmatics
(n - 16) exposed to filtered air and 10 /yg/m3.
12 healthy adults exposed to filtered air and
10 /yg/m3 at rest; 12 healthy adults exposed to
filtered air, 10 and 25/yg/m3 with intermittent
exercise; 16 healthy adults exposed to filtered
air and 50 /yg/m3 with intermittent exercise.
Exposures were conducted via mouthpiece.
Time to analysis: Immediately following
exposure as well as 3.5, 21, and 45 h post-
exposure.
No PM-induced changes in eNO or cell counts, IL-6, or
IL-8 in induced sputum were observed in any of the
protocols 21 h following exposure. Ultrafine carbon
was not observed to increase respiratory symptoms in
any of the study protocols. Healthy adults experienced
an ultrafine PM-induced reduction in maximal
mid-expiratory flow and CO diffusing capacity relative
to filtered air 21 h following exposure.
Reference: Pourazar et
al. (2005, 088305)
Subjects: 15 healthy
adults
Gender: 11 M/4 F
Age: 21-28 yrs
DE
Idling Volvo diesel engine
Particle Number/Count:
4.3 x 106/cm3
Concentration: PMio
300 /yg/m3
Subjects exposed to DE and filtered air for 1 h
with intermittent exercise (randomized
crossover study design). Other diesel emissions
measured: NO2 (1.6 ppm), NO (4.5 ppm), CO
(7.5 ppm), total hydrocarbons (4.3 ppm),
formaldehyde (0.26 mg/m3).
Time to analysis: 6 h post-exposure.
Exposure to DE significantly increased nuclear
translocation of NF-kB, AP-1, phosphorylated p38,
and phosphorylated JNK in bronchial epithelium
6 h post-exposure.
Reference: Pourazar et
al. (2008,156884)
Subjects: 15 healthy
adults
Gender: 11 M/4 F
Age: 21-28 yrs
DE
Idling Volvo diesel engine
Particle Number/Count:
4.3 x 106/cm3
Concentration: PMio
300 /yg/m3
Subjects exposed to DE and filtered air for 1 h
with intermittent exercise (randomized
crossover study design). Other diesel emissions
measured: NO2 (1.6 ppm), NO (4.5 ppm), CO
(7.5 ppm), total hydrocarbons (4.3 ppm),
formaldehyde (0.26 mg/m3).
Time to analysis: 6 h post-exposure.
Exposure to DE observed to enhance epidermal growth
factor receptor (EGFR) expression in bronchial
epithelium 6 h post-exposure.
Reference: Riechelmann
et al. (2004,180120)
Subjects: 30 healthy
adults
Gender: 11 M/19F
Age: 22-32 yrs
Urban dust
NIST SRM 1649a
Concentration: 150,
500/yg/m3
Subjects exposed to both concentrations of An increase in nasal secretion (nasal cytology) of IL-6
urban dust (nose only exposure system) as well and IL-8 were observed 24 h after exposure to
as filtered air for 3h at rest in a randomized 500 /yg/m3 urban dust,
crossover design. Exposures were separated by
at least 1 wk.
Time to analysis: 30 min, 8 h, and 24 h post-
exposure.
July 2009
C-13
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Findings
Reference: Samet et al.
(2007,156940)
Subjects: Ultrafine
CAPs: 20 healthy adults,
Coarse CAPs: 14 healthy
adults
Gender: Ultrafine CAPs:
11 M/9 F, Coarse CAPs:
8 M/6 F
Age: 18-35 yrs
CAPs (Chapel Hill, NC)
Particle Size: Ultrafine:
0.049 ± 0.009 /jm,
Coarse: 3.59 ± 0.58/jm
Concentration: Ultrafine:
47.0 ± 20.2/yg|m3,
Coarse:
89.0 ± 49.5/yg/m3
Preliminary report comparing effects of
controlled exposures to coarse, fine, and
ultrafine CAPs among healthy adults (3
separate studies). A randomized crossover
design was used in evaluating effects of
coarse CAPs (n — 14) and ultrafine CAPs
(n — 20) relative to filtered air following of 2-h
exposures with intermittent exercise. Results
compared with previous study of controlled
exposure to fine CAPs (Chapel Hill, NC) where
subjects did not serve as their own controls
(Ghio et al„ 2000, 012140)
Time to analysis: 0-20 h post-exposure.
As was shown with fine CAPs, exposure to coarse
CAPs increased the percentage of neutrophils in
bronchoalveolar lavage fluid 20 h following exposure.
Unlike fine CAPs, coarse CAPs did not increase the
percent of monocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.
Ultrafine CAPs were not shown to affect any markers
of pulmonary inflammation in bronchoalveolar lavage
fluid 18 h after exposure. No CAPs-induced changes in
lung function were observed.
Reference: Samet et al.
(2009,191913)
Subjects: 19 healthy
adults
Gender: 10 M/9 F
Age: 18-35 yrs
Ultrafine CAPs (Chapel
Hii.NC)
Particle Size: <
0.16/ym
Particle Number/Count:
120,662 ± 48,232
particles/cm3
Concentration: 49.8 ±
20/yg/m3
Subjects exposed for 2 h with intermittent 15
periods of exercise to UF CAPs and filtered air
using a randomized crossover study design.
Time to analysis: Immediately following
exposure and 1 and 18 h post-exposure.
No effect of UF CAPs observed on pulmonary function
immediately following exposure or 18 h post-exposure.
IL-8 in BAL fluid was observed to increase with UF
CAPs 18 h post exposure. UF CAPs was not shown to
alter any other inflammatory markers in BAL fluid.
Reference: Schaumann
et al. (2004, 087966)
Subjects: 12 healthy
adults
Gender: 4 M/8 F
Age: Avg 27 ± 2.5 yrs
Fine PM
Collected (filter) from
industrialized and
non-industrialized areas in
Germany
Concentration: 100 /yg
per subject
Bronchoscopic instillation of particles collected Particles collected from the industrialized area
from both areas was conducted in
contralateral lung segments for each subject.
Time to analysis: 24 h post-instillation.
(transition metal-rich) increased the percentage of
monocytes and oxidant radical generation in
bronchoalveolar lavage fluid 24 h after exposure
compared with PM containing less metal.
Reference: Stenfors et
al. (2004,157009)
Subjects: 15 asthmatic
adults, 25 healthy adults
Gender: Asthmatic: 10
M/5 F, Healthy: 16 M/9 F
Age: Asthmatic: 22-52
yrs, Healthy: 19-42 yrs
DE
Volvo diesel engine
Concentration: PMii
108/yg/m3
Subjects were exposed for 2 h with
intermittent exercise to DE and filtered air
using a randomized crossover study design.
Other diesel emissions measured: NO2 (0.7
ppm).
Time to analysis: 1 h after the start of
exposure, immediately following exposure, and
6 h post-exposure.
DE was observed to increase neutrophilia and IL-8 in
bronchial lavage fluid among healthy subjects 6 h
after exposure. Among asthmatic subjects, exposure
to DE did not cause an increase in inflammatory
markers. No diesel-induced change in pulmonary
function was observed during or immediately
following exposure.
Reference: Tunnicliffe et Aerosols of ammonium
al. (2003, 088744)
Subjects: 12 asthmatic
adults, 12 healthy adults
Gender: Asthmatics: 7
M/5 F, Healthy: 5 M/7 F
Age: Asthmatics: avg
35.7 yrs, Healthy: avg
34.5 yrs
bisulfate and sulfuric acid
Particle Size: MMD
0.3/ym
Concentration: 200,
2,000 /yg/m3
Subjects were exposed for 1 h at rest to
ammonium bisulfate (low and high
concentrations), sulfuric acid (low and high
concentrations) and filtered air in a randomized
crossover design. Exposures were separated by
at least 2 wks and were conducted using a
head dome exposure system.
Time to analysis: Immediately following
exposure as well as 5.5-6 h post-exposure.
Neither ammonium bisulfate nor aerosolized sulfuric
acid were not observed to affect lung function or
respiratory systems following exposures to 200 or
2,000 /yglm3 among healthy or asthmatic adults.
Exposures to ammonium bisulfate at both
concentrations resulted in a significant increase in
eNO in the asthmatic subjects.
Table C- 3. Central Nervous System Effects
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Findings
Reference: Cruts DE
et al. (2008,
156374)
Subjects: 10
healthy adults
Gender: M
Age: 18-39 yrs
Idling Volvo diesel engine
(TD45, 4.5 L, 4
cylinders, 680 rpm)
Particle
Number/Count: 1.2 x
106/cm3
Concentration:
300/yg/m3
Subjects were exposed to DE and filtered air for 1 h at rest in Exposure to DE was observed to significantly
a randomized crossover study design. Exposures were
separated by 2-4 days. Other diesel emissions measured: NO2
(1.6 ppm), NO (4.5 ppm), CO (7.5 ppm), total hydrocarbons
(4.3 ppm).
Time to analysis: From onset of exposure until 1 h post-
exposure.
increase the median power frequency (MPF) in
the frontal cortex during exposure, as well as in
the hour following the completion of the
exposure.
July 2009
C-14
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Annex C References
Alexis NE; Lay JC; Zeman KL; Geiser M; Kapp N; Bennett WD. (2006). In vivo particle uptake by
airway macrophages in healthy volunteers. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol, 34- 305-313. 088636
Barregard L; Sallsten G; Andersson L; Almstrand AC; Gustafson P; Andersson M; Ohn AC. (2008).
Experimental exposure to wood smoke- effects on airway inflammation and oxidative stress.
Occup Environ Med, 65- 319-324. 155675
Barregard L; Sallsten G; Gustafson P; Andersson L; Johansson L; Basu S; Stigendal L. (2006).
Experimental exposure to wood-smoke particles in health humans' effects on markers of
inflammation, coagulation, and lipid peroxidation. Inhal Toxicol, 18- 845-853. 091381
Bastain TM; Gilliland FD; Li Y-FJ Saxon A; Diaz-Sanchez D. (2003). Intraindividual reproducibility of
nasal allergic responses to diesel exhaust particles indicates a susceptible phenotype. , 109- 130-
136. 098690
Beckett WS; Chalupa DF; Pauly-Brown A; Speers DM; Stewart JC; Frampton MWi Utell MJ; Huang
LS; Cox C; Zareba W; Oberdorster G. (2005). Comparing inhaled ultrafine versus fine zinc oxide
particles in healthy adults - A human inhalation study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 171- 1129-
1135. 156261
Behndig AF; Mudway IS; Brown JL; Stenfors N Helleday R Duggan ST; Wilson SJ; Boman C Cassee
FR; Frew AJ; Kelly FJ; Sandstrom T Blomberg A. (2006). Airway antioxidant and inflammatory
responses to diesel exhaust exposure in healthy humans. Eur Respir J, 27- 359-365. 088286
Blomberg A; Tornqvist H; Desmyter L; Deneys V; Hermans C. (2005). Exposure to diesel exhaust
nanoparticles does not induce blood hypercoagulability in an at-risk population. J Thromb
Haemost, 3: 2103-2105. 191991
Bosson J; Barath S; Pourazar J; Behndig AF; Sandstrom T; Blomberg A; Adelroth E. (2008). Diesel
exhaust exposure enhances the ozone-induced airway inflammation in healthy humans. Eur
Respir J, 31: 1234-1240. 156287
Bosson J; Pourazar J; Forsberg B; Adelroth E; Sandstrom T; Blomberg A. (2007). Ozone enhances the
airway inflammation initiated by diesel exhaust. Respir Med, 10L 1140-1146. 156286
Brauner EV; Forchhammer L; Moller P; Barregard L; Gunnarsen L; Afshari A; Wahlin P; Glasius M;
Dragsted LO; Basu S; Raaschou-Nielsen O; Loft S. (2008). Indoor particles affect vascular
function in the aged: an air filtration-based intervention study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 177:
419-425. 156293
Brauner EV; Forchhammer L; Moller P; Simonsen J; Glasius M; Wahlin P; Raaschou-Nielsen O; Loft S.
(2007). Exposure to ultrafine particles from ambient air and oxidative stress-induced DNA
damage. , 115: 1177-82. 188507
Brauner EV; Mortensen J; Moller P; Bernard A; Vinzents P; Wahlin P; Glasius M; Loft S. (2009).
Effects of ambient air particulate exposure on blood-gas barrier permeability and lung function. ,
21: 38-47. 190244
Brook RD; Brook JR; Urch B; Vincent R; Rajagopalan S; Silverman F. (2002). Inhalation of fine
particulate air pollution and ozone causes acute arterial vasoconstriction in healthy adults. ,
105: 1534-1536. 024987
Brauner EV; Moller P; Barregard L; Dragsted LO; Glasius M; Wahlin P; Vinzents P; Raaschou-Nielsen
O; Loft S. (2008). Exposure to ambient concentrations of particulate air pollution does not
influence vascular function or inflammatory pathways in young healthy individuals. Part Fibre
Toxicol, 5:13. 191966
Carlsten C; Kaufman JD; Trenga CA; Allen J; Peretz A; Sullivan JH. (2008). Thrombotic markers in
metabolic syndrome subjects exposed to diesel exhaust. Inhal Toxicol, 20: 917-921. 156323
Carlsten C; Kaufman Joel D; Peretz A; Trenga Carol A; Sheppard L; Sullivan Jeffrey H. (2007).
Coagulation markers in healthy human subjects exposed to diesel exhaust. , 120: 849-855.
155714
Note: Hyperlinks to the reference citations throughout this document will take you to the NCEA HERO database
(Health and Environmental Research Online) at http://epa. gov/hero. HERO is a database of scientific literature
used by U.S. EPA in the process of developing science assessments such as the Integrated Science Assessments
(ISA) and the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS).
July 2009
C-15
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Cruts B; van Etten L; Tornqvist H; Blomberg A; Sandstrom T; Mills NL; Borm PJ. (2008). Exposure to
diesel exhaust induces changes in EEG in human volunteers. Part Fibre Toxicol, 5- 4. 156374
Danielsen PH; Brauner EV; Barregard L; Sallsten G; Wallin M; Ohnski R; Rozalski R; Moller P; Loft S.
(2008). Oxidatively damaged DNA and its repair after experimental exposure to wood smoke in
healthy humans. , 642- 37"42. 156382
Devlin RB; Ghio AJ; Kehrl H; Sanders G; Cascio W. (2003). Elderly humans exposed to concentrated air
pollution particles have decreased heart rate variability. Eur Respir J, 40- 76S-80S. 087348
Fakhri AA; Ilic LM; Wellenius GA; Urch B; Silverman F; Gold DR; Mittleman MA. (2009). Autonomic
effects of controlled fine particulate exposure in young healthy adults' Effect modification by
ozone. Environ Health Perspect, In Press- In Press. 191914
Frampton MWi Stewart JC; Oberdorster G; Morrow PE; Chalupa D; Pietropaoli AP; Frasier LM;
Speers DM; Cox C; Huang LS; Utell MJ. (2006). Inhalation of ultrafine particles alters blood
leukocyte expression of adhesion molecules in humans. Environ Health Perspect, 114- 51-58.
088665
Ghio AJ; Kim C; Devlin RB. (2000). Concentrated ambient air particles induce mild pulmonary
inflammation in healthy human volunteers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 162- 981-988. 012140
Gilliland FD; Li YF; Saxon A; Diaz-Sanchez D. (2004). Effect of glutathione-S-transferase Ml and PI
genotypes on xenobiotic enhancement of allergic responses' randomised, placebo-controlled
crossover study. Lancet, 363' 119-125. 156471
Gong H Jri Linn WS; Clark KW; Anderson KR; Geller MD! Sioutas C. (2005). Respiratory responses to
exposures with fine particulates and nitrogen dioxide in the elderly with and without COPD.
Inhal Toxicol, 17: 123-132. 087921
Gong H Jr; Linn WS; Clark KW; Anderson KR; Sioutas C; Alexis NE; Cascio WE; Devlin RB. (2008).
Exposures of healthy and asthmatic volunteers to concentrated ambient ultrafine particles in
Los Angeles. Inhal Toxicol, 20: 533-545. 156483
Gong H Jr; Linn WS; Terrell SL; Anderson KR; Clark KW; Sioutas C; Cascio WE; Alexis N> Devlin RB.
(2004). Exposures of elderly volunteers with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
(COPD) to concentrated ambient fine particulate pollution. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 731-744. 087964
Gong H Jr; Linn WS; Terrell SL; Clark KW; Geller MD; Anderson KR; Cascio WE; Sioutas C. (2004).
Altered heart-rate variability in asthmatic and healthy volunteers exposed to concentrated
ambient coarse particles. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 335-343. 055628
Graff D; Cascio W', Rappold A; Zhou H; Huang Y; Devlin R. (2009). Exposure to concentrated coarse air
pollution particles causes mild cardiopulmonary effects in healthy young adults . Environ Health
Perspect, 117: 1089-1094. 191981
Huang Y-CT; Ghio AJ; Stonehuerner J; McGee J; Carter JD; Grambow SC; Devlin RB. (2003). The role
of soluble components in ambient fine particles-induced changes in human lungs and blood.
Inhal Toxicol, 15: 327-342. 087377
Kongerud J; Madden MC; Hazucha M; Peden D. (2006). Nasal responses in asthmatic and
nonasthmatic subjects following exposure to diesel exhaust particles. Inhal Toxicol, 18: 589-594.
156656
Larsson BM; Sehlstedt M; Grunewald J; Skold CM; Lundin A; Blomberg A; Sandstrom T; Eklund A;
Svartengren M. (2007). Road tunnel air pollution induces bronchoalveolar inflammation in
healthy subjects. , 29: 699-705. 189320
Lucking A; Lundback M; Mills N; Faratian D; Barath S; Pourazar J; Cassee F; Donaldson K; Boon N;
Badimon J. (2008). Diesel exhaust inhalation increases thrombus formation in man. Eur Heart
J, 29: 3043. 191993
Lund AK; Lucero J; Lucas S; Madden MC; McDonald JD; Seagrave JC; Knuckles TL; Campen MJ.
(2009). Vehicular emissions induce vascular MMP-9 expression and activity associated with
endothelin-l-mediatedpathways. , 29: 511-7. 191159
Lundback M; Mills NL; Lucking A; Barath S; Donaldson K; Newby DE; Sandstrom T; Blomberg A.
(2009). Experimental exposure to diesel exhaust increases arterial stiffness in man. Part Fibre
Toxicol, 6:7. 191967
Mills NL; Robinson SD; Fokkens PH; Leseman DL; Miller MR; Anderson D; Freney EJ; Heal MR;
Donovan RJ; Blomberg A; Sandstrom T; MacNee W', Boon NA; Donaldson K; Newby DE; Cassee
FR. (2008). Exposure to concentrated ambient particles does not affect vascular function in
patients with coronary heart disease. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 709-715. 156766
July 2009
C-16
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Mills NL; Tornqvist H; Robinson SD; Gonzalez M; Darnley K; MacNee W; Boon NA; Donaldson K;
Blomberg A; Sandstrom T; Newby DE. (2005). Diesel exhaust inhalation causes vascular
dysfunction and impaired endogenous fibrinolysis. Circulation, 112- 3930-6. 188557
Mills NL; Tornqvist H; Gonzalez MC; Vink E; Robinson SD; Soderberg S; Boon NA; Donaldson K;
Sandstrom T; Blomberg A; Newby DE. (2007). Ischemic and thrombotic effects of dilute diesel"
exhaust inhalation in men with coronary heart disease. , 357- 1075-1082. 091206
Mudway IS; Stenfors N; Duggan ST; Roxborough H; Zielinski H; Marklund SL; Blomberg A; Frew AJ;
Sandstrom T; Kelly FJ. (2004). An in vitro and in vivo investigation of the effects of diesel
exhaust on human airway lining fluid antioxidants. Arch Biochem Biophys, 423- 200-212.
180208
Peretz A,Peck EC,Bammler TK,Beyer RP,Sullivan JH,Trenga CA,Srinouanprachnah S,Farin
FM,Kaufman JD. (2007). Diesel exhaust inhalation and assessment of peripheral blood
mononuclear cell gene transcription effects' an exploratory study of healthy human volunteers. ,
19: 1107-19. 189082
Peretz A; Kaufman JD; Trenga CA; Allen J; Carlsten C', Aulet MR; Adar SD; Sullivan JH. (2008).
Effects of diesel exhaust inhalation on heart rate variability in human volunteers. Environ Res,
107: 178-184. 156855
Peretz A; Sullivan JH; Leotta DF; Trenga CA; Sands FN; Allen J; Carlsten C; Wilkinson CW; Gill EA;
Kaufman JD. (2008). Diesel exhaust inhalation elicits acute vasoconstriction in vivo. Environ
Health Perspect, 116: 937-942. 156854
Pietropaoli AP; Frampton MW; Hyde RW; Morrow PE; Oberdorster G; Cox C; Speers DM; Frasier LM;
Chalupa DC; Huang LS; Utell MJ. (2004). Pulmonary function, diffusing capacity, and
inflammation in healthy and asthmatic subjects exposed to ultrafine particles. Inhal Toxicol, 16:
59-72. 156025
Pourazar J; Blomberg A; Kelly FJ; Davies DE; Wilson SJ; Holgate ST; Sandstrom T. (2008). Diesel
exhaust increases EGFR and phosphorylated C"terminal Tyr 1173 in the bronchial epithelium.
Part Fibre Toxicol, 5: 8. 156884
Pourazar J; Mudway IS; Samet JM; Helleday R; Blomberg A; Wilson SJ; Frew AJ; Kelly FJ; Sandstrom
T. (2005). Diesel exhaust activates redox-sensitive transcription factors and kinases in human
airways. Am J Physiol, 289: L724-L730. 088305
Power K; Balmes J; Solomon C. (2008). Controlled exposure to combined particles and ozone decreases
heart rate variability. J Occup Environ Med, 50: 1253. 191982
Riechelmann H; Rettinger G; Lautebach S; Schmittinger S; Deutschle T. (2004). Short-term exposure to
urban dust alters the mediator release of human nasal mucosa. J Occup Environ Med, 46: 316-
322. 180120
Routledge HC; Manney S; Harrison RM; Ayres JG; Townend JN. (2006). Effect of inhaled sulphur
dioxide and carbon particles on heart rate variability and markers of inflammation and
coagulation in human subjects. Heart, 92: 220-227. 088674
Rundell KW! Caviston R. (2008). Ultrafine and fine particulate matter inhalation decreases exercise
performance in healthy subjects. , 22: 2-5. 191986
Samet JM; Graff D; Berntsen J; Ghio AJ; Huang YC; Devlin RB. (2007). A comparison of studies on the
effects of controlled exposure to fine, coarse and ultrafine ambient particulate matter from a
single location. Inhal Toxicol, 19 Suppl l: 29"32. 156940
Samet JM; Rappold A; Graff D; Cascio WE; Berntsen JH; Huang YC, Herbst M; Bassett M; Montilla T;
Hazucha MJ; Bromberg PA; Devlin RB. (2009). Concentrated ambient ultrafine particle
exposure induces cardiac changes in young healthy volunteers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 179:
1034-1042. 191913
Schaumann F; Borm PJA; Herb rich A; Knoch J; Pitz M; Schins RPF; Luettig B; Hohlfeld JM; Heinrich
J; Krug N. (2004). Metal-rich ambient particles (particulate matter 25) cause airway
inflammation in healthy subjects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 170: 898-903. 087966
Shah AP; Pietropaoli AP; Frasier LM; Speers DM; Chalupa DC; Delehanty JM; Huang LS; Utell MJ;
Frampton MW. (2008). Effect of inhaled carbon ultrafine particles on reactive hyperemia in
healthy human subjects. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 375-380. 156970
Stenfors N; Nordenhall C; Salvi SS; Mudway I; Soderberg M; Blomberg A; Helleday R; Levin JO;
Holgate ST; Kelly FJ; Frew AJ; Sandstrom T. (2004). Different airway inflammatory responses
in asthmatic and healthy humans exposed to diesel. Eur Respir J, 23: 82"86. 157009
July 2009
C-17
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Tornqvist H; Mills NL; Gonzalez M; Miller MR; Robinson SD; Megson IL; MacNee WJ Donaldson K;
Soderberg S> Newby DE; Sandstrom T> Blomberg A. (2007). Persistent endothelial dysfunction in
humans after diesel exhaust inhalation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 176- 395-400. 091279
Tunnicliffe WS; Harrison RM; Kelly FJ; Dunster C; Ayres JG. (2003). The effect of sulphurous air
pollutant exposures on symptoms, lung function, exhaled nitric oxide, and nasal epithelial lining
fluid antioxidant concentrations in normal and asthmatic adults. Occup Environ Med, 60.
088744
Urch B; Brook JR; Wasserstein D; Brook RD; Rajagopalan S> Corey P; Silverman F. (2004). Relative
contributions of PM2.5 chemical constituents to acute arterial vasoconstriction in humans. Inhal
Toxicol, 16: 345-352. 055629
Urch B; Silverman F; Corey P; Brook JR; Lukic KZi Rajagopalan S; Brook RD. (2005). Acute blood
pressure responses in healthy adults during controlled air pollution exposures. Environ Health
Perspect, 113: 1052-1055. 081080
Zareba W', Couderc JP; Oberdorster G; Chalupa D; Cox C; Huang LS; Peters A; Utell MJ; Frampton
MW. (2009). ECG parameters and exposure to carbon ultrafine particles in young healthy
subjects. Inhal Toxicol, 21: 223-233. 190101
July 2009
C-18
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Annex D. Toxicological Studies
Table D-1.
Cardiovascular effects.
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Anselme
et al. (2007, 097084)
Species:
Rat
Gender:
Male
Strain: Wistar
Age: Adult
Weight: 200-225g
DE: monocylinder Diesel engine using
Euro 4 ELF 85A reference gasoline
Particle Size: DE: 10-650 nm (85
nm mean mobility diameter)
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: DE: 0.5 mgfm3; Other
emissions measured: non-methane
hydrocarbons (7.7 ppm), NO2 (1.1 ppm), CO
(4.3 ppm)
Time to Analysis: Experiments started 3
months after L coronary artery ligation. ECG
started at tO and the DE exposure at t30 min
for a 3h period; ventricular premature beats
(VPBs) and RMSSD calculated every 30 min
during clean room air exhaust and PE periods.
Early (t210-300 min) and late (t480-540 min)
PE were analyzed.
Immediate decrease in RMSSD was observed in
both healthy and CHF rats PE. Immediate
increase in VPBs observed in CHF rats only:
which lasted 4-5h after exposure ceased.
Whereas HRV progressively returned to
baseline values within 2.5 h post-exposure (PE),
the proarrhythmic effect persisted as late as 5
h PE termination in CHF rats
Reference:
al. (2004, 055638)
Species:
Rat
Gender:
Male
Strain: SH
Age: 13-15wks
et LPS and EHC-93 (PM): Urban Air Route: IT Instillation
collected at the Health Effects
Institute Ottawa, Canada
Particle Size: EHC-93: 0.8-0.4/ym
(mean) (range: < 3 //m)
Dose/Concentration: PM: 10 mg/kg of bw;
LPS- 350 EU/animal
Time to Analysis: Sacrificed 4 or 24 h post-
instillation
PM and LPS elicited a significant increase in
receptor-dependent vasorelaxation of the aorta
compared to saline-instilled rats.
Reference: Bagate et EHC-93 (PM),
al. (2004, 055638)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SH
Age: 13-15wks
CB-V or CB-Fe, LPS
Particle Size: EHC-93: 0.8-0.4/ym
(mean) (range: < 3/ym)
Route: Aortic Suspension Fluid
Dose/Concentration: Cumulative
concentrations of EHC-93, CB-V and CB-Fe
(10,25, 50, 75,100//g/mL)
CB 1.5-2.0 nm (mean) (range < 5//m)
Time to Analysis: Immediately post-exposure
of aortic rings to cumulative concentrations of
EHC-93, CB-V, CB-Fe and LPS.
CB-V particles induced more relaxation than
CB-Fe particles or EHC-93 in a dose-dependent
manner. PM and LPS had an acute transient
effect on the receptor dependent
vasorelaxation. PM and LPS attenuated ACh-
elicited vasocontraction in denuded aortic rings
(DARs).
Note: Hyperlinks to the reference citations throughout this document will take you to the NCEA HERO database
(Health and Environmental Research Online) at http://epa. gov/hero. HERO is a database of scientific literature
used by U.S. EPA in the process of developing science assessments such as the integrated Science Assessments (ISA)
and the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS).
July 2009
D-1
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: E
al. (2004, 055638)
Species:
Rat
Gender:
Male
Strain: Wistar Kyoto
Aqe: 13-15wks
EHC-93 (PM): Urban Air collected at
the Health Effects Institute Ottawa,
Canada.
EHC-93 filtrate (PMF)
Zn2+ and Cu2+ particles (10,000 and
845 //g PM respectively)
Particle Size: PM: 4.6 //m
(GSD - 3.2)
Route: In Vitro
Dose/Concentration: PM Suspensions: 10-
100//glmL; CuS04/ZnS04 1-100//mol; Phe 2
//m; arbacol: 10//m
Time to Analysis: Measured immediately
after maximum response for each cumulative
dose was achieved.
PM-lnduced Contraction: No effect of
suspension or filtrate seen on resting tension of
aorta and SMRA.
PM- and Metal-Induced Vasorelaxation:
Cumulative concentrations (10-100 //g/mL) of
PM suspension and its water soluble
components (PMF) elicited dose-dependent
relaxation in aorta. Relaxation induced by
particle suspension was higher than relaxation
induced by free filtrate. The difference was
significant at 100 //glmL. In SMRA, vasore-
laxation similar to aorta's was observed, and
the activity of the particle suspension was
stronger than the filtrate, with the difference
being significant starting at 30 //g/mL. Both
Zn2+ and Cu2+ in sulfate salts (10-100//mol)
induced relaxation in pre-contracted aortic
rings, with Cu2+ having a greater effect than
Zn at the same concentration. Ions didn't
affect ACh relaxation.
Effect of PM on a-Adrenergic Contraction:
Phenylephrine-induced dose-response
contraction, starting at 1//M with max at 100
//mol. Pretreatment of SMRA did not change
the phenylephrine-induced contraction.
Reference: Bagate et
al. (2006, 097608)
Species:
Rat
Gender:
Male
Strain: Wistar Kyoto
(WKY) and SH
Age: 13-15wks
EHC-93 (PM)
EHC-93 (Filtrate)
Cu2+ and Zn2+ solutions
Particle Size: PM: 4.6 //m
(GSD - 3.2)
Route: In Vitro
Dose/Concentration: PM and PMF
Suspensions: 10-100//g/mL; CuS04 or
ZnS04:10-100 //mol; Phenylephrine: 2 //m;
Carbacol: 10//m
Time to Analysis: Responses evaluated at
maximum of each dose-response.
PM and its soluble components elicited
endothelium-independent vasodilation in rat
aorta rings. This response is a result of the
activation of sGC since its inhibition by
NS2028 practically eliminated relaxation. PM
suspensions stimulated cGMP production in
purified isolated sGC. Neither receptor nor their
signaling pathways played a significant role in
the direct relaxation by PM or metals.
Vasodilation responses were significantly
higher in SH than WKY control rats.
Reference: Bagate et
al. (2006, 096157)
Species:
Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SH/NHsd
Age: 11-12 wks
Weight: 250-350g
pretreated with PM or LPS the isolated heart
had a reduced ability to recover to baseline
levels after occlusion, in comparison with saline
treated rats. After occlusion was released CF
went back to baseline values. Saline and LPS
treated rats, showed a gradual decrease in CF
noted during the reperfusion period. Isolated
hearts from PM-exposed SH showed a
complete restoration of CF and no gradual
decrease. The increase of Zn2+ elicited a rapid
decrease of LDVP and HR. The impairment of
cardiac function measured by LDVP and HR
started immediately upon Zn2+ infusion and
remained the same during the perfusion period
(no Zn2 + was present in the perfusate).
EHC-93 (PM): Urban Air collected at Route: IT Instillation
the Health Effects Institute Ottawa,
Canada.
EHC-93 (Filtrate),
Zinc (in PM), LPS
Particle Size: PM: 4.6//m
(GSD - 3.2)
Dose/Concentration: PM: 10 mg/kg of bw;
LPS: 350 EU/animal (0.5 mL)
Time to Analysis: 4h post-exposure
Effect of Pretreatment on Baseline
parameters of Isolated Perfused Heart:
After PM exposure a slight increase of baseline
coronary flow (CF) and heart rate (HR) was
noted. In contrast, a significant decrease of left
developing ventricular pressure (LDVP) was
observed in SH. LPS also elicited a non-
significant decrease in LVDP.
Effect of Pretreatment and Ischemia on
Cardiac Function: When SH rats were
Reference: Bagate et
al. (2006, 096157)
Species:
Rat
Strain: H9c2 (EACC),
EHC-93 (PM) Filtrate: Urban Air col-
lected at the Health Effects Institute
Ottawa, Canada,
ZnS04
Particle Size: PM: 4.6 //m
Route: In Vitro
Dose/Concentration: PM: 1, 50,100 //g/mL;
ZnS04: 50 //mol
Time to Analysis: 30min incubation
Effect of EHC-93 filtrate on Ca2+ Uptake
in Cardiomyocytes: Both PMF and Zn2 +
inhibited ATP or ionophore-stimulated Ca2 +
influx in cardiomyocytes.
cardiomyocyte cells (GSD - 3.2); Carbon Particles: 44nm
July 2009
D-2
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Bartoli et
al. (2009,156256)
Species: Dog
Gender: Female
Strain: Mixed breed
Age: 2-12yrs
Weight: Average:
15.7kg, Range: 13.6-
18.2kg
CAPs (Boston: Harvard Ambient
Particle Concentrator)
Particle Size: Diameter: 0.15-2.5
/jm
Route: Permanent Tracheostomy
Dose/Concentration: Concentration range
and mean: CAPs: 94.1-1557(358.1 ±306.7)
/yg/m3, BC: 1.3-32(7.5±6.1)/yg/m3, Particle
count: 3000-
69300(18230 ±13.151 articles/cm3
Time to Analysis: Preanesthetized.
Tracheostomy. 5h exposures separated by
minimum 1wk. Prazosin administered in 8 of
13 dogs 30-60min before exposure. 55
exposure days.
CAPs significantly increased SBP, DBP, mean
arterial pressure, HR and rate-pressure product.
Prazosin (o-adrenergic antagonist) decreased
these CAPs-induced effects. CAPs mass, BC,
particle number concentrations were positively
and significantly associated with each of the
cardiovascular parameters except for pulse
pressure.
Reference: Bartoli et
al. (2009,179904)
Species: Dog
Gender: Female
Strain: Mixed breed
Age: Adult
Weight: 14-18kg
CAPs (Boston: Harvard Ambient
Particle Concentration)
Particle Size: Diameter: ~2.5/ym
Route: Permanent Tracheostomy
Dose/Concentration: Concentration range
and mean: CAPs: 94.1-1556.8 (349±282.6)
/yg/m3, BC: 1.3-32 (7.5±5.6)/yg/m3, Particle
number: 3000-69300 (20381 ±13075)//g/m3
Time to Analysis: Tracheostomy. Minimum
3wk recovery. Acclimatized. Exposed 5h. 2
5min occlusions of LAD coronary artery
separated by 20min rest. Exposure days
separated by 1wk minimum.
During coronary artery occlusion, CAPs
exposure reduced myocardial blood flow and
increased coronary vascular resistance, SBP
and DBP. CAPs effects were greater in
ischemic tissue than nonischemic. Increases in
CAPs mass, particle number and BC
concentrations were significantly associated
with decreased myocardial blood flow and
increased coronary vascular resistance.
Reference: Campen
et al. (2005, 083977)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: C57BL/6J and
Apo E'1'
Age: 10-12wks
High Whole DE (HWDE); Low Whole
DE (LWDE): High PM Filtered (HPMF);
Low PM Filtered (LPMF)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Whole-body Inhalation Chambers and
Ex-vivo Exposures (isolated, pressurized septal
coronary arteries)
Dose/Concentration: HWDE: PM - 3.6
mg/m3: NOx - 102 ppm
LWDE: PM - 0.512 mg/m3; NOx - 19 ppm:
PM - 0.770 mg/m3: NOx - 105 ppm
LPMF: PM - 0.006 mg/m3: NOx - 26 ppm
Time to Analysis: Whole-body Exposures: DE
or PFDE for 6h/day for 3 days, euthanized at
the end of last exposure.
Coronary Vessels Exposure: PSS bubbled with
DE to expose coronary vessels to the soluble
contents of DE. Analysis occurred
immediately post exposure.
Whole-body Exposure on ApoE': During DE
exposure, ApoE'1' mice HR consistently
decreased during high concentration exposures,
compared to the C57BL/6J strain.
Coronary Vascular Effects on ApoE': DE
had no significant effects on the resting
myogenic tone of isolated septal coronary
arteries. Control coronary arteries showed
constrictive responses to ET-1 and dilatory
responses to SNP. DE exposed PSS vessels
responses to ET-1 enhanced compared to
control. SNP-induced dilation blunted in vessels
resting in diesel-exposed saline.
Reference: Campen
et al.(2003, 055626)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male and
Female
Strain: SH
Aqe: 4 m
DE: generated by either of two
Cummins (2000 model) 5.9-L ISB
turbo engines fueled by Number 2
Diesel Certification Fuel.
Particle Size: 0.1-0.2 /jm
aerodynamic diameter
Route: Whole-body exposure
Dose/Concentration: 0, 30,100, 300,1000
/yg/m3
Time to Analysis: 6 h/day for 7 days: ECG
measurements taken 4 days post-exposure.
HR: Significantly higher in exposed animals and
not concentration-dependent. More substantial
results seen in male rats.
ECG: The PQ interval was significantly
prolonged among exposed animals in a
concentration-dependent manner.
Reference: Campen
et al. (2006, 096879)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: ApoE1
Age: 10wks
Road dust from paved surfaces
(Reno, NV)
Gasoline engine emissions, containing
PM, NOx, CO and HC
Particle Size: Road dust: 1.6 //in
(Standard Deviation 2.0)
Gasoline engine emissions: Average
particle diameter of 15 nm
Route: Whole-body inhalation
Dose/Concentration: Road dust: 0.5 and 3.5
mg/m3:
Gasoline engine emissions: 5 to 60 /yg/m3 (at
dilutions of 10:1,15:1, and 90:1)
Mean concentrations of PM: 61 /yg/m3; NOx:
18.8 ppm: CO: 80 ppm.
Time to Analysis: 6h/d for 3d. Sacrificed
18h post-exposure.
ET-1: Gasoline exhaust significantly
upregulated ET-1 in a dose-dependent manner.
ET-1 increased levels in the PM filtered group
and decreased in the low levels of road dust.
ECG: HR consistently decreased from beginning
to end of exposure in all groups. No significant
HR effects on road dust or gasoline exposure
was observed. No significant effects on P-
wave, PQ-interval, QRS-interval, or QT-interval
were observed in either treatment.
T-wave: Mice exposed to whole gasoline
exhaust displayed significant increases in T-
wave morphology from the beginning of
exposures: this effect was consistent on all
exposure days.
July 2009 D-3 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Cascio et
al. (1987, 007583)
Species:
Mouse
Gender:
Male
Strain: ICR
Aqe: 6-10wks
UFPM: Ultra fine PM, EPA Chapel
Hill, NC
Particle Size: <0.1 /ym
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 100 //g in 100 ul
Time to Analysis: 24h post exposure (single
exposure)
UFPM exposure double the size of myocardial
infarction attendant to an episode of ischemia
and reperfusion while increasing post ischemic
oxidant stress. UFPM alters endothelium-
dependent/independent regulation of systemic
vascular tone; increases platelet number,
plasma fibrinogen, and soluble P-selectin levels;
reduces bleeding time.
Reference: Chang et
al. (2007,155720)
Species:
Rat
Gender:
Male
Strain: SH
Aqe: 60d
UfCB: Ultra fine carbon blackFerric
sulfate Fe2(S04>3
Nickel sulfate NiS04
Particle Size: UfCB
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: UfCB: 415 and 830 //g
Ferric Sulfate: 105 and 210 /yg
Nickel Sulfate: 263 and 526 /yg
Combined UfCB and ferric sulfate: 830 /yg
UfCB + 105/yg Ferric Sulfate
Combined UfCB with Nickel Sulfate: 830 /yg
UfCB + 263 /yg Nickel Sulfate
Time to Analysis: Single dose,
radiotelemetry readings recorded for 72h post
exposure.
Both high/low-dose UfCB decreased ANN
(normal-to-normal intervals) slightly around the
30th hour, concurrent increases of LnSDNN.
LnRMSSD returned to baseline levels after
small initial increases. Minor effects observed
after low-dose Fe and Ni instilllation; biphasic
changes occurred after high-dose instillations.
Combined exposures of UfCB and either Fe or
Ni resulted in HRV trends different from values
estimated from individual-component effects.
Reference: Chang et
al. (2007,155720)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SH
Aqe: 10wks
CAPs: collected during a dust storm
from Chung-Li, Taipei
Particle Size: PM2.6
Route: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 315.55 //g/m3
Time to Analysis: 6h
A linear mixed-effects model revealed sigmoid
increases in HR and a sigmoid decrease of QAI
during exposure, after an initial incubation
period.
Reference: Chang et
al. (2004, 055637)
Species:
Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SH
Aqe: 60d
CAPs collected in Chung-Li, Taipei
(spring and summer periods)
Particle Size: PM2.6
Route: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: Spring exposure: 202.0
± 68.8 /yg/m3; Mean number concentration:
2.30 x 106 particles/cm3 (range: 7.12 x 103 -
8.26 x 106)
Summer exposure: 141.0 ± 54.9/yg/m3;
Mean number concentration: 2.78 x 106
particles/cm3 (range: 7.76 x 103 - 8.87 x 106)
Time to Analysis: 4d of spring exposure and
6d of summer exposure for 5h each exposure.
Parameters measured throughout duration of
exposures.
During spring exposures, the maximum increase
of heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were
51.6 bpm and 8.5 mmHg respectively. The
maximum decrease of QAI (measures cardiac
contractility) noted at the same time was 1.6
ms. Similar pattern was observed during
summer exposure, however., the responses
were less prominent.
Reference: Chang, et CAPs collected in Chung-Li, Taipei
al. (2005, 097776) Partjc|e Sjze. pM26 (o.1-2.5/ym)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SH
Weight: 200g
Route: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 202.0 ± 68.8 /yglm3
Time to Analysis: 5hfd for 4d
During the inhalation stage, crude effects of
both LnSDNN and LnRMSSD for exposure and
control groups decreased from the baseline
values. Immediately after the experiments, both
LnSDNN and LNRMSSD decreased due to
stresses produced by release from the exposure
system, then returned to the baseline values.
Reference: Chauhan
et al. (2005,155722)
Tumor Cell Line:
A549 derived from
alveolar type II
epithelial cells
SRM-1879 (Si02) and SRM-154b
(Ti02) from the NIST
EHC-93 from Ontario, Canada
(EHCsol, EHCinsol)
Particle Size: EHC-93 median
physical diameter: 0.4 /ym; Ti02 and
SiCh particle size distribution: 0.3-0.6
/ym
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 0,1, 4, and 8 mg EHC
total equivalent per 5 mL
Time to Analysis: Culture medium was
removed from flasks and replaced wI 5 mL of
the particle suspension media. Plates were
incubated for 24h. After 24h cell culture
supernatants were collected and analyzed.
The decreased expression of preproET-1 in
A549 cells suggests that epithelial cells may
not be the source of higher pulmonary ET -1
spillover in the circulation measured in vivo in
response to inhaled urban particles. However,
higher levels ECE-1 in A549 post-exposure to
particles suggests an increased ability to
process bigET-1 into mature ET-1 peptide,
while increased receptor expression implies
responsiveness. The increased release of II-8
and VEGF by epithelial cells in response to
particles could possibly up regulate ET-1
production in the adjacent pulmonary capillary
endothelial cells, with concomitant increased
ET-1 spillover in the systemic circulation.
July 2009 D-4 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Chen et
al. (2005, 087218)
Species: Mouse
Strain: Normal (C57)
and ApoE"1
CAPs (NYU, NY)
Particle Size: PM2.B
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 10 x ambient
concentrations
19.7/yglm3 average concentration over 5
months (daily average exposure concentration
was 110/yg/m3)
Time to Analysis: 6hfd, 5 dfwk, for 5m.
Parameters measured continuously
throughout.
Significant decreasing patterns of HR, body
temperature, and physical activity for ApoE'1'
mice, with nonsignificant changes for C57
mice. SDNN and RMSSD in the late afternoon
and overnight for ApoE'1' mice showed a gradual
increase for the first 6 weeks, a decline for
about 12 more weeks, and a slight turn upward
at the end of the study period. For C57 mice,
there were no chronic effect changes in SDNN
or RNSSD in the late afternoon, and a slight
increase after 6 weeks for the overnight period.
Reference: Chen LC
and Nadziejkov C,
(2005,087219)
Species: Mouse
Strain: Normal (C57),
ApoE'1',
Age: 26-28wks (C57),
39-41 wks (ApoE 1),
and 18-20wks (LDLr
[DK])
CAPs (NYU, NY)
Particle Size: PM2.6
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: Mean exposure
concentration: 110/yg/m3
Time to Analysis: 6hfd, 5dfwk for up to 5m.
Sacrificed 3 to 6d after last exposure.
All DK mice developed extensive lesions in the
aortic sinus regions. In male DK mice, the lesion
areas appeared to be enhanced by CAPs
exposure. Plaque cellularity was increased, but
there were no CAPs-associated changes in the
lipid content. ApoE '' and DK mice showed
prominent areas of severe atherosclerosis.
Quantitative measurements showed that CAPs
increased the percentage of aortic intimal
surface covered by grossly discernible
atherosclerotic lesion.
Reference: Corey LM
et al. (2006,15G3GG)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: ApoE1
Age: 11-12m
Weight: 32.84g (avg)
PM collected November - March
between 1996-1999(Seattle, WA)
Silica (U.S. Silica Company, Berkeley
Springs, WV)
Particle Size: PM2.6
Route: Nasal Instillation
Dose/Concentration: PM: 1.5 mg/kg; Saline:
50ul; Silica: Min-u-Sil 5 in 50 ul saline
Time to Analysis: Mice monitored for 1 d
baseline prior to and for 4d following
exposure.
After an initial increase in both HR and activity
in all groups, there was delayed bradycardia
with no change in activity of the animals in the
PM and silica exposed groups. In addition, with
PM and silica exposure, there was a decrease
in HRV parameters.
Reference: Cozzi et
al. (2006, 091380)
Species: Mouse
Strain: ICR
Aqe: 6-10wks
Ultrafine PM (collected continuously
over 7 day periods in Oct 2002 in
Chapel Hill, NC)
Particle Size: < 150nm
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 100 /yg of PM in
vehicle
Time to Analysis: 24h post-exposure
Ischemia-Reperfusion: PM exposure doubled
the relative size of myocardial infarction com-
pared with the vehicle control. No difference
was observed in the percentage of the vehicle
at the risk of ischemia. PM exposure increased
the level of oxidative stress in the myocardium
after l-R. The density of neutrophils in the
reperfused myocardium was increased by PM
exposure, but differences in the numbers of
blood leukocytes, expression of adhesion
molecules on circulating neutrophils, and acti-
vation state of circulating neutrophils, 24 h
after PM exposure, could not be correlated to
the increase l-R injury observed.
Isolated Aortas: Aortas isolated from PM-
exposed animals exhibited a reduced
endothelium-dependent relaxation response to
ACh.
Reference: Dvonch
JT et al. (2004,
055741)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Brown
Norway
CAPs, Detroit, Ml
Particle Size: PM2.6
Route: Whole-body Inhalation Chamber
Dose/Concentration: Average concentration
354 /yglm3
Time to Analysis: 8hfd for 3 consecutive
days; plasma samples collected 24h post-
exposure.
Plasma concentrations of asymmetric
dimethylarginine (ADMA) were significantly
elevated in rats exposed to CAPs versus
filtered air.
July 2009
D-5
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Elder et
al. (2004, 055642)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Fischer 344
and SH
Age: 23m (Fischer);
11 -14m (SH)
Weight: NR
UFP ¦ Ultrafine carbon particles;
LPS (Sigma)
Particle Size: UFP: 36nm (median
size)
Route: Intraperitoneal Injection (ip) for saline
and LPS
Whole-body exposure for inhaled particles
Dose/Concentration: Particles: 150 mgfm3;
LPS: 2mg/kg bw
Time to Analysis: Single 6h exposure to
particles. Sacrificed 24h after ip LPS
exposure.
BAL fluid cells: Neither inhaled UFP nor ip LPS
cause a significant increase in BAL fluid total
cells or the percentage of neutrophils in either
rat strain. No significant exposure-related
alteration in total protein concentration or the
activites of LDH and b-glucuronidase.
Peripheral blood: In both rat strains ip LPS
induced significant increase in the number and
percentage of circulating PMNs. When
combined with inhaled UFP, PMNs decreased,
significantly for F-344 rats. Plasma fibrinogen
increased with ip LPS in both rat strains with
the magnitude of change greater in SH rats.
UFP alone decreased plasma fibrinogen in SH
rats. Combined UFP and LPS response was
blunted, but significantly higher than controls.
Hematocrit was not altered in either rat strain
by any treatment.
TAT complexes: With all exposure groups
averaged, plasma TAT complexes in SH rats
were 6.5 times higher than in F-344 rats. LPS
caused an overall increase in TAT complexes
for F-344 rats that was further augmented by
inhaled UFP. UFP alone decreased response. In
SH rats, UFP alone significant increased
response and LPS decreased response.
ROS in BAL cells: In F-344 rats both UFP and
LPS have independent and significant effects
on DCFD oxidation. Effects were in opposite
directions; particles decreased ROS, LPS
increased ROS.
Reference: Finnerty
et al. (2007,156434)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: C57BL/6
Age: 9 wks
Weight: 22-2g
Coal Fly Ash (U.S. EPA), Analysis:
(PM2.E samples) low unburned carbon
(0.53 wt%), moderate levels of
transition metals, including (in //gig):
Fe (30, 400), Mg (31, 200), Ti (6,
180 ), Mn (907), and V (108).
Particle Size: 1.8 and 2.5/ym
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: PM: 200/yg; PM + 10
/yg LPS: 200/yg; PM + 100/yg LPS: 200 //g
Time to Analysis: 18h after IT instillation
Plasma: TNF-a significantly increased in both
PM+LPS10 and PM+LPS100 treatments. For
plasma IL-6, all groups tended to rise with a
significant increase in the PM+LPS100 group.
Reference: Floyd et
al. (2009,190350)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: ApoE'1'
Aqe: 20wks
CAPs: PM2.6 concentrated from
Tuxedo, NY (April-Sept 2003)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: Avg 120 //gfm3
(n-6/group)
Time to Analysis: 6h/d x 5dfwk * 5m
Gene Expression: Microarry gene expression
identified 395 genes downregulated and 216
genes upregulated in the aortic plaques.
Ontologic analysis identified a list of functional
processes associated with gene expression and
included: inflammation, tissue development,
cellular movement, cellular growth and
proliferation, hematological system
development and function, lipid metabolism,
cardiovascular system function, cellular
assembly and organization, and cell death.
Reference: Floyd et
al. (2009,190350)
Species: Mouse
Gender: NR
Strain: ApoE'
Age: 6wks
Weight: NR
CAPs (Tuxedo, NY) (April-September
2003) (modified VACES system)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Exposure Chamber
Dose/Concentration: Average concentration:
120 /yglm3
Time to Analysis: Exposed 6hfd, 5dfwk, 5m.
CAPs altered 611 genes of which 306 were
significantly related to alterations in molecular
pathways and associated with biological
pathways. The 50 most significant biological
function alterations related to CVD. Further
analysis of recent literature showed that some
CAPs-altered genes were the same as genes
altered by CVD or unstable-human plaque gene
expression.
Reference: Folkmann
et al. (2007, 097344)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: Wild type and
ApoE'1'
Age: 11-13wks
Weight: 21 g (avg)
DEP: SRM2975 (particulate fraction
of exhaust from a filtering system
designed for diesel-powered
forklifts).
Particle Size: DEP: NR
Route: Intraperitoneal Injection
Dose/Concentration: 0, 50, 500, 5,000 /yg
DEP/kg of bw
Time to Analysis: 6 or 24 h post-ip injection
The expression of inducible nitric oxide
synthase (iNOS) mRNA was increased in the
liver 6h post-ip injection. The level of oxidized
purine bases, determined by formami-
dopyrimidine DNA glycosylase sites increased
significantly in the liver after 24 h in in mice
injected w/ 50/yg/kg of bw. There was no
indication of systemic inflammation determined
as the serum concentration of nitric oxide and
iNOS expression, and DNA damage was not
increased in the aorta.
July 2009 D-6 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Furuyama
et al. (2006, 097056)
Species: Rat
Cell Type: Heart
Micro vessel
Endothelial (RHMVE)
Cells
OE-DEP, OE-UFP (from Urawa,
Saitama, Japan)
OE - Organic Extracts
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 0, 5,10, 25//gfmL of
OE-DEP or OE-UFP
Time to Analysis: Exposed for 0, 6,12, 24,
or 36h
The cell monolayer exposed to 10 /yglmL OE-
UFP produced a larger amount of HO-1 than
cells exposed to 10 /yglmL OE-UFP. OE-DEP and
OE-UFP exposure reduced PAI-1 production by
the cells but did not affect the production of
thrombomodulin, tissue-type PA, or urokinase-
type PA. Increased PAI-1 synthesis in response
to treatment with 1 ng/mL TNF-a or 0.5ng/mL
TGF (31 was reduced by OE-DEP exposure.
Suppression of PAI-1 production by OE-DEP
exposure was mediated through oxidative
stress and was independent of HO-1 activity.
Reference: Gerlofs-
Nijland et al. (2009,
190353)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SH
Age: 12wks
Weight: 200-300g
PM (Prague, Czech Republic;
Duisburg, Germany; Barcelona, Spain)
(Prague and Barcelona coarse PM
organic extracts)
Particle Size: Coarse: 2.5-10/ym,
Fine: 0.2-2.5 fjm
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 7mg PM/kg body
weight
Time to Analysis: DTPA added to some PM
samples preinstillation. Instilled with PM.
Necropsy 24h postexposure.
Inflammation (LDH, protein, albumin),
cytotoxicity (NAG, MP0, TNF-a), and
fibrinogen were increased by PM, and were
greatest in the coarse PM fraction. Metal-rich
PM had greater inflammatory and cytotoxic
effects, and increased fibrinogen and vWF and
decreased ACE. PAH content influenced greater
inflammation (including neutrophils),
cytotoxicity, and fibrinogen. Generally, whole
PM and coarse PM were more potent than
organic extracts and fine PM, respectively.
Reference: Ghelfi et
al. (2008,156468)
Species: Rat
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Aqe: Adult
CAPs
CPZ (Capsazepine) (Axxora LLC, San
Diego, CA)
Particle Size: PM2.6
Route: CAPs: Inhalation via Whole-body
Exposure; CPZ: IP Injection or Aerosol
Dose/Concentration: CAPs: mean mass
concentration: 218 ±23/yglm3; CPZ:
10mg/kg (ip), 500 /ymol (aerosol)
Time to Analysis: Experiment 1: CPZ ip or
20min aerosol pretreatment immediately prior
to CAPs exposure. Single CAPs exposure for
5h. Parameters measured immediately
following exposure.
Experiment 2: CPZ ip pretreatment prior to
CAPs exposure. Exposed to CAPs for 5h/day
for4mths. Parameters measured throughout
duration of experiment.
CPZ (ip or aerosol) decreased CAPs-induced
chemiluminescence (CL), lipid thiobarbituric acid
reactive substances (TBARS), and edema in the
heart, indicating that blocking TRP receptors,
systemically or locally, decreases heart CL.
CAPs exposure led to significant decreases in
HR and in the length of QT, RT, Pdur and Tpe
intervals. These changes were observed
immediately upon exposure, and were
maintained throughout the 5h period of CAPs
inhalation. Changes in cardiac rhythm and ECG
morphology were prevented by CPZ.
Reference: Gilmouret
al. (2004, 054175)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar (Crl:
Wl) BR
ufCB (Printex 90 from Frankfurt,
Germany)
fCB (Huber 990 from UK)
Particle Size: ufCB: 114 nm
(MMAD); fCB: 268 nm (MMAD).
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: ufCB: 1.66 mgfm3;
fCB: 1,40mg/m3
Time to Analysis: Single exposure for 7h
Sacrified and samples taken at 0,16, and 48h equivalent antioxidant status
post-exposure.
Exposure to ultrafine, but not fine, CB particles
was also associated with significant increases
in the total number of blood leukocytes. Plasma
fibrinogen factor VIII and vWF were unaffected
by particle treatments as was plasma Trolox
Reference: Gilmour
PS et al.(2005,
087410)
Species: Human
Cell Types: Primary
Human Monocyte
Derived Macrophages
(MP); Human Umbilical
Vein Endothelial Cells
(HUVEC); A549 cells;
Human Bronchial
Epithelial Cells
(16HBE)
PM in: (Carbon Black from Degussa
Ltd, Frankfurt, Germany)
Particle Size: PMio
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: PMio: 50 and
100/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: 6 and 20h
The culture media from MPs and 16HBE cells
but not A549 cells, exposed to PMio had an
enhanced ability to cause clotting. H202 also
increased clotting activity. Apoptosis was
significantly increased in MPs exposed to PMio
and LPS as shown by annexin V binding. TF
gene expression was enhanced in MPs exposed
to PMio and HUVEC tissue factor. tPA gene
and protein expression were inhibited.
July 2009
D-7
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Gilmour et Zinc Sulfate
al. (2006,156472) (ZnS04 in saline solution)
Species: Rat Particle Size: NR
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar Kyoto
Age: 12-14wks
Weight: 280-340g
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 131 /yglkg of bw (2
//mol/kg)
Time to Analysis: 1, 4, 24, 48h
Zinc levels in plasma and tissue: At 1 -24 h
post exposure, zinc plasma levels increased to
nearly 20% above baseline.
mRNA expression: Cardiac tissues demon-
strated similar temporal increases in
expressions of TF, PAI-1 and thrombomodulin
mRNA, following pulmonary instillation of Zn.
Cardiac histopathology: Mild and focal acute,
myocardial lesions developed in a few Zn ex-
posed rats. No changes in fibrin deposition or
troponin disappearance were observed. At 24
and 48h PE to Zn, increases occurred in levels
of systemic fibrinogen an the activated partial
thromboplastin time.
Reference: Gong et
al. (2007, 091155)
Species: Human and
Mouse
Cell Type: Human
Microvascular
Endothelial Cells
(HMEC)
Strain: C57BL/6J
Gender: Male (mouse)
Age: 2m (mouse)
Organic DEP extract: collected from
exhaust in a 4JB1 -type LD, 2.74
liter, 4-cylinder Isuzu diesel engine
(provided by Masaru Sagai, Tsukuba,
Japan)
ox-PAPC: (provided by Judith
Berliner, UCLA, CA)
In vivo validation: Ultrafine (ufp) and
fine (fp) particulate matter
Particle Size: DEP < 1 /jm
(diameter)
Route: Cell culture; In vivo validation via
Whole-body inhalation
Dose/Concentration: ox-PAPC: 10, 20, and
40/yglmL; DEP: 5,15, and 25//gfmL; DEP (5
/yg/mL)+ox-PAPC: 10 or 20/yglmL
In Vivo Valudation: Ufp: 3.24x106/cm3; fp:
2.7x106|cm3
In vivo validation: Ufp: <0.18//m;fp: <2.5
/jm
Time to Analysis: 4h
In vivo validation: Exposed to CAPs for
5h/day, 3d/wk for 8wks. Sacrificed 24h after
last CAPs exposure.
Gene-expression profiling showed that both
DEP extract and ox-PAPC co-regulated a large
number of genes. U sinfg network analysis to
identify co-expressed gene modules, led to the
discovery of three modules that were highly
enriched in genes that were differentially
regulated by the stimuli. These modules were
also enriched in synergistically co-regulated
genes and pathways relevant to vascular
inflammation.
In vivo validation: Results were validated by
demonstrating that hypercholesterolemic mice
exposed to ambient ultrafine particles inhibited
significant upregulation of the module genes in
the liver.
Reference: Goto et al
(2004,088100)
Species: Rabbit
Gender: Female
Strains: NZW
Age: NR
Weight: 2.3 kg
Cytokine release: EHC stimulation increased
the release of GM-CSF, IL-6, IL-1(3, TNF-a, IL-8
and MCP-1. No effect on m-CSF and MIP-1 p.
CC particles induced increases in IL-6 and TNF-
a; other cytokine levels did not differ from
control.
Supernatant instillation: AM + EHC increased
circulating WBC and band cell counts.
Circulating monocyte counts were unaffected.
AM+EHC showed a major increase in fraction
and amount of monocyte released as well as
faster clearance when compared to control.
The BM monocyte pool was similar in all
groups.
Monocyte transit time through BM:
Exposure to EHC, CC only shortened the transit
time of monocytes as compared to controls.
AM+EHC also shortened monocyte transit time
whereas AM+CC had a nonsignificant effect.
EHC-93 (Ottawa, ON,Canada)
CC: Coilloidal Carbon (obtained from
Hamburg, Germany)
Particle Size: EHC-93: PMio; CC: <
1 /jm
Route: Intrabronchial Instillation
Dose/Concentration: AMs incubated with
EHC-93 or CC: 0.6 ml/kg
EHC-93 alone: 1 mL (500//g/ mL)
CC alone: 1mL (1% CC)
Time to Analysis: WBC counts measured 4 -
168h after BrdU injection. Sacrificed 7d post
instillation.
Lung distribution of PMio: PM-containing
AMs were distributed diffusely. PM-containing
AMs were more prevalent in the PM exposed
animals. There was no AM-containing particle
difference between the CC-exposed and EHC-
93-exposed groups.
Monocyte release from Bone Marrow: EHC
exposure increased WBC and band cell counts
from 12hours after instillation. Monocyte count
was not affected. Labeled monocytes peaked
more quickly after DEP exposure (12h vs 16 h
for control). There was no observed change in
BM monocyte pool.
July 2009
D-8
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Gottipolu
RR et al.(2009,
190360)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar Kyoto
(WKY), SH
Age: 14-16wks
Weight: NR
DE (30-kW (40hp) 4-cylinder indirect
injection Deutz diesel engine) (O2-
20%, CO- 1.3-4.8ppm, NO- <2.5-
5.9ppm, N02- < 0.25-1.2ppm, S02-
0.2-0.3ppm, 0C/EC- 0.3±0.03)
Particle Size: Number Median
Diameter: Low- 83±2nm, High-
88.2nm; Volume Median Diameter:
Low- 207±2nm, High- 225±2nm
Route: Exposure Chamber
Dose/Concentration: Low- 507±4//g/m3,
High- 2201 ±14//g/m3
Time to Analysis: Exposed 4hfd, 5d/wk,
4wks. Necropsied 1d postexposure.
DE increased neutrophils in a concentration-
dependent manner, and GGT activity at the
high dose. Particle-laden macrophages were
found in DE-exposed rats. DE dose-dependently
inhibited mitochondrial aconitase activity. DE
caused 377 genes to be differentially
expressed within WKY rats, most of which
were downregulated, but none in SH rats.
However, WKY rats had an expression pattern
shift that mimicked baseline expression of SH
rats without DE. These genes regulated
compensatory response, matrix metabolism,
mitochondrial function, and oxidative stress
response.
Reference: Graff et Zinc (Zn); Vanadium (
al. (2005, 087956) Partjc|e Sjze. NR
Species: Rat
Cell Type: Ventricular
Myocytes
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 0, 6.25,12.5, 25, or
50 //m
Time to Analysis: Toxicity: 24h post
exposure
Beat Rate: 0.5,1, 2, 4, and 24h PE
PCR: 6 and 24h PE
Beat Rate: There were statistically significant
reductions in spontaneous beat rate 4 and 24 h
post-exposure (greater reductions were
observed with Zn).
Inflammation: Exposure to Zn or V (6.25-50
//m) for 6h produced significant increases in IL-
6, IL-a, heat shock protein 70, and connexin 43
(Cx43).
Impulse Conduction: 24 h post-exposure, Zn
induced significant changes in the gene ex-
pression of Kv4.2 and KvQLt, a-1 subunit of L-
type Ca channel, Cx43, IL-6, and IL-1 a. V pro-
duced a greater effect on Cx43 and affected
only KvLQT 1.
Reference: Gunnison
and Chen (2005,
087956)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: F2 generation
DK (ApoE1, LDLr'1')
Age: 18-20wks
CAPs (Tuxedo, NY)
Copollutants measured: O3 and NO2.
Particle Size: 389 ± 2nm
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: CAPs: 131 ±99
//g/m3
(range 13-441 //g/m3)
0:i: 10 ppb
NO2: 4.4 ppb
Time to Analysis: 6h/d, 5d/wk for
approximately 4m. Tissue collection was
performed 3-4d after the last day of
exposure.
Gene expression: In CAPs-exposed heart
tissue, the expression of Limdl and Rex3 were
the most consistently affected genes among
the exposed mice. Limdl was down regulated
by 1.5-fold or greater from moderate baseline
expression. Rex3 showed a relatively small
increase in absolute expression.
Reference: Gurgueira
et al. (2002, 036535)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Weight: 250-300g
CAPs:
Carbon Black (CB from Fisher
Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA): C (85.9 ±
0.2%); 0(13 ± 0.2%); S (1.17 ±
0.02%)
ROFA: obtained from an oil-fired
power plant (Boston, MA)
Particle Size: CAPs size range: 0.1-
2.5 //m; CB and ROFA (PM2.6)
Route: Whole-body Exposure Chamber
Dose/Concentration: CAPs: average mass
concentration: 300 ± 60//g/m3; ROFA: 1.7
mg/m3; CB: 170 //g/m3
Time to Analysis: CAPs: 1, 3, and 5h; ROFA:
30min; CB: 5h
Oxidative stress: Rats breathing CAPs
aerosols for 5 h showed significant oxidative
stress, determined as in situ
chemiluminescence (CL) in the lung, heart, but
not in the liver. ROFA also triggered increases
in oxidant levels but not particle-free air or CB.
Increases in CL showed strong associations
with the CAPs content of Fe, Al, Si and Ti in
the heart. The oxidant stress imposed by 5h
exposure to CAPs was associated with slight,
but significant increases in the lung and heart
water content, with increased serum levels of
lactate dehydrogenase, indicating mild damage
to tissues. CAPs inhalation also led to tissue-
specific increases in the activities of SOD and
catalase.
Reference: Gursinsky
et al. (1976, 015607)
Species: Rat
Cell Type: Fibroblasts
isolated from adult
male Wistar rats
hearts
Fly ash (TAF98)
Particle Size: Nl
Route: In Vitro
Dose/Concentration: TAF98: 0,1, 2 3,10,
25, 50,100, 200 //g/mL
Time to Analysis: 0, 5,10, 30, 60,120min
Brief treatment of fibroblasts with fly ash
triggered the immediate formation of ROS.
Using phosphospecific antibodies the activation
of p38 MAP kinase, p44/42 MAP kinase
(ERK1/2) and p70S6 kinase. Prolonged
incubation with fly ash increased the
expression of collagen 1 and TGF-(31, but
decreased mRNA levels of MMP9 and TNF-a.
Cell proliferation was inhibited at high
concentrations of fly ash. An increase in the
level of advanced glycation end product
modification of various cellular proteins was
observed.
July 2009 D-9 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Hansen et DEP: SRM-2975 (NIST)
al. (2007, 090703)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: ApoEand
C57BL/6J ApoE+l+
Aqe: 11-13wks
Particle Size: DEP: 215nm
(geometric mean diameter)
Route: Intraperitoneal Injection
Dose/Concentration: DEP: 0, 0.5 and 5
mg/kg of bw; Aorta segments incubated with
0,10 and 100 f/g DEP/mL
Time to Analysis: Sacrificed 1h after ip
injection.
Exposure to 0.5 mg/kg DEP caused a decrease
in the endothelium-dependent Ach elicited
vasorelaxation in ApoE'1' mice, whereas the re-
sponse was enhanced in ApoE+/+ mice. No
significant changes were observed after
administration of 5 mg/kg DEP. K+ or
phenylephrine induced constriction was not af-
fected.
Reference: Hansen et
al. (2007, 090703)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: ApoE ' and
C57BL/6J ApoE+l+
Use: Aorta rings used
for in-vitro studies
DEP: SRM-2975 (NIST)
Particle Size: DEP: 215nm
(geometric mean diameter)
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 0,10 and 100/yg
DEP/mL
Time to Analysis: Basal tone measured at 5
different points throughout experiment.
Exposure to 100//g DEP/mL enhanced ACh-
induced relaxation and attenuated
phenylephrine-induced constriction.
Vasodilatation induced by sodium nitroprusside
was not affected by any DEP exposure.
Reference: Harder et
al. (2005, 087371)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar Kyoto
Age: 12-15wks
Carbon UFPs ((generated by Electric
Spark Generator GFG 1000; Palas,
Karlsruhe, Germany)
Particle Size: 37.6 ± 0.7nm (mean)
Route: Whole-body Exposure
ChamberDose/Concentration: 180 /yg/m3
Time to Analysis: Days 1-3: baseline read-
ing,
Day 4: exposure to UFPs or filtered air for 4
or 24h then sacrificed immediately following
exposure period OR
Sacrificed following 1 -3d recovery period.
Cardiovascular Performance: Mild but
consistent increase in heart rate (HR), which
was associated with a significant decrease in
HR variability during exposure (particle-induced
alteration of cardiac autonomic balance,
mediated by a pulmonary receptor activation).
Lung Inflammation and Acute-Phase Re-
sponse: BALF revealed significant but low-
grade pulmonary inflammation.
Effects on Blood: There was no evidence of
an inflammation-mediated increase in blood
coagulability; no changes in plasma fibrinogen
or factor Vila.
Pulmonary and Cardiac Histopathology:
Sporadic accumulation of particle-laden
macrophages found in the alveolar region. No
signs of cardiac inflammation or cardio-
myopathy.
mRNA Expression Levels: No significant
changes in the lung or heart.
Reference: Harder et
al. (2005, 087371)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar Kyoto
Age: 14-17wks
Weight: NR
Carbon UFP
Particle Size: Diameter:
37.6±0.7nm
Route: Exposure Chamber
Dose/Concentration: 180/yg/m3
Time to Analysis: Telemeter implanted into
peritoneal cavity. 10d recovery. 3d baseline
reading. 24h exposure. 3d recovery.
Carbon UFP mildly but significantly elevated HR
compared to the control. SDNN was
significantly decreased during exposure. UFP
induced mild pulmonary inflammation,
significantly increased PMN, and increased the
total protein and albumin concentrations.
Particle-laden macrophages sporadically
accumulated in the alveolar region.
Reference: Hirano et Organic Extracts of DEP (DEP) and
al. (2003, 097345) Organic Extracts of Ultra Fine
Species: Rat Particles (UFP).
Cell Types: Heart (Urawa CitV' Saitama' JaPan'
Microvessel Particle Size: DEP and UFP: < 2.0
Endothelial Cells /jm
(RHMVE)
Route: Cells Culture
Dose/Concentration: NAC effects on
viability: DEP: 25 /yg/ml; UFP: 50 /yg/ml
mRNA levels for DEP and UFP: 0,1,3,10
/yg/ml
cell monolayer exposed to DEP and UFP:
1,10,100 //g/ml
Time to Analysis: mRNA levels measured
after 6h incubation with DEP or UFP. Other
parameters measured after 24h.
Cytotoxicity and Oxidative Stress: LC50
values were 17 and 34/yg/mL for DEP and UFP
respectively. The viability of DEP and UFP
exposed cells was ameliorated by N-acetyl-L-
cysteine (NAC).
mRNA levels: mRNA levels increased dose-
dependently with DEP and H0-1 mRNA showed
the most marked response to DEP. mRNA
levels of antioxidant enzymes and heat shock
protein 72 (HSP72) in DEP-exposed cells were
higher than UFP exposed cells at the same
concentration. The transcription levels of H0-1
and HSP72 in DEP and UFP-exposed cells were
also reduced by NAC.
July 2009 D-10 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Hwang et
al. (2005, 089454)
Species: Mouse
Strain: Normal (C57)
and ApoE"1
CAPs (Tuxedo, NY)
Particle Size: 389 ± 2nm
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: CAPs Range: 5-627
/yg/m3. Mean CAPs Concentration: 133//g/m:
Mean Concentrations of Ozone and Nitrogen
in CAPs: 10 and 4.4 ppb respectively.
Time to Analysis: 6hfday, 5dfwk for 5m.
Long-term Analysis: Significant decreasing
patterns of heart rate (HR), body temperature
^ (T), and physical activity (PA) in ApoE'1' mice.
Nonsignificant changes for C57 mice. The
chronic effect changes for HR, T, and PA for
ApoE'1' mice were maximal in the last three
weeks.
Short-term Analysis: Dose-dependent
relationship for HR variations in ApoE'1' mice.
Heart Rate Fluctuation: HR fluctuations in
Apo E : mice during the period of 3-6 h
increased by 1.35 fold at the end of the
exposure and during a 15 min period increases
by 0.7 fold at the end of the exposure.
Reference: Inoue et DEP (obtained from a 4Jb1-type light- Route: IT Instillation
al. (2006,190142) duty, 4-cylinder, 2.74-L Isuzu diesel
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: ICR
Age: 6-7wks
engine)
Washed DEP (carbonaceous nuclei of
DEP after extraction) and DEP-0C
(organic chemicals in DEP extracted
with CH2CI2); Washed DEP + LPS and
DEP-0C+LPS
Particle Size: PM2.6
Dose/Concentration: Washed DEP: 4mgfkg
bw. DEP-0C: 4mg/kg bw. LPS: 2.5mg/kg.
Washed DEP+LPS and DEP-0C +LPS:
respective additions of LPS to each
component prior-experimentation.
Time to Analysis: Sacrificed 24h post single
dose instillation.
Both DEP components exacerbated vascular
permeability. The increased fibrinogen and E-
selectin levels induced by LPS. This
exacerbation was more prominent with washed
DEP than with DEP-0C. Washed DEP+LPS
significantly decreased protein C and
antithrombin-lll and elevated circulatory levels
of IL-6, KC and LPs without significance.
Reference: Ito et al.
(2008, 096823)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar Kyoto
(Specific pathogen-
free)
Age: 13-14 wks
CAPs (f-PM) from Inhalation Facility
in Yokohama City, Japan.
Particle Size: 0.1-2.5 /jm
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 0.6-1.5 mgfm3
Time to Analysis: Three groups exposed to:
(1) filtered air for 4d, (2) filtered air for 3d
and CAPs for 1 d or (3) CAPs for 4d. All
groups exposed for a maximum of 4.5hfd for 4
consecutive days.
mRNA expression and cardiovascular
function: In samples of heart tissue, the mRNA
of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1B1, heme
oxygenase-1 (HO-1), and endothelin A (ETa)
receptor were up-regulated by CAPs; their
levels were significantly correlated with the
cumulative weight of CAPs in the exposure
chamber. The up-regulation of ETa receptor
mRNA was significantly correlated with the
increase in H0-1 mRNA and weakly with the
increase in MBP.
Reference: Khandoga
A et al. (2004,
087928)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: C57B1/6
Age: 5-7wks
UFPs: Ultra fine carbon black
particles (Printex 90)
Particle Size: 14nm diameter (60 [
<100nm)
Route: Aortic Infusion
Dose/Concentration: 1x10' and 5x10'
total particles infused
300 m2/g surface area
Time to Analysis: Single exposure, analysis
2h post exposure
Platelet effects: Application of UFPs caused
significantly enhanced platelet accumulation on
endothelium of postsinusodal venules and
sinusoids in healthy mice. UFP-induced platelet
adhesion was not preceded by platelet rolling
but was strongly associated with fibrin deposi-
tion and an increase in vWF expression on the
endothelial surface.
Inflammatory effects: In contrast,
inflammatory parameters such as the number
of rolling/adherent leukocytes, P-selectin
expression/translocation, and the number of
apoptotic cells were not elevated. UFPs did not
affect sinusoidal perfusion and Kupffer cell
function.
Reference: Knuckles
et al. (2007,156652)
Species: Rat
Gender: Female
(Pregnant, purchased
at gestation day 19)
Strain Sprague-
Dawley:
Age: 60-90d
Weight: 300g
Use: RMCs were
harvest from 1d old
neonatal pups using
the neonatal rat
cardiomyocyte
isolation kit
ROFA-L: Leachate
Particle Size: < 0.2/jm
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 3.5 //gfmL
Time to Analysis: 1h
ROFA-L induced alterations to the RCM
transcriptosome: 38 genes were suppressed
and 44 genes were induced PE. Genomic
alterations in pathways related to IGF-1, VEGF,
IL-2, PI3/AKT, CVD, and free radical scavenging
were detected. Global gene expression was
altered in a manner consistent with cardiac
myocyte electrophysiological remodeling,
cellular oxidative stress and apoptosis.
ROFA-L induced alterations to the RCM
transcription factor proteome: ROFA-L
altered the transcription factor proteome by
suppressing activity of 24 and activating 40
transcription factors out of 149.
July 2009 D-11 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Knuckles
et al. (2008,191987)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: C57BL/6
Age: 8-10wks
Weight: NR
DE (single cylinder Yanmar diesel
generator burning #2 certified diesel
fuel (Chevron-Phillips, Borger, TX)
under 100% load)
Particle Size: PM2.6
Route: Whole-body Exposure. Ex Vivo.
Dose/Concentration: In vivo: 350//g/m3; Ex
vivo: PM2.6 concentration 2-3mg/m3 flow rate
500mL/min
Time to Analysis: Exposed 4h. Ex vivo
assays.
Veins: DE increased vascular reactivity to ET-
1. Ex vivo exposed vessels had greater
vasoconstriction. L-NAME (an arginine blocker)
did not promote constriction in DE-exposed rats
but did so in controls.
Arteries: DE did not significantly alter vascular
reactivity. Carbonyls or alkanes alone or with
DE did not alter vasoconstriction.
Reference: Kodavanti
et al. (2008,155907)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar Kyoto
(WKY)
Age: 12-14wks
G1: saline (control); G2: Mount Saint
Helen's ash (SH); G3: whole suspen-
sion of oil combustion PM at high
concentration (PM-HD); G4: whole
suspension of oil combustion PM at
low concentration (PM-LD); G5:
saline-leachable fraction of PM high-
concentration suspension; G6: ZnS
7H20
Particle Size: PM2.6
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: Doses (mg/kg/week)
are for 8 and 16 weeks (PM-solid and soluble
Zn) respectively. G1: 0.00-0.00 and 0.00-
0.00; G2: 4.60-0.00 and 2.30-0.00; G3: 4.60-
66.8 and 2.30-33.4; G4: 2.30-33.4 and 1.15-
16.7; G5: 0.00-66.8 and 0.00-33.4; G6: 0.00-
66.8 and 0.00-33.4
Time to Analysis: 1 x/wk for 8 or 16wks;
analyzed 48h after last instillation.
DNA damage (left ventricular tissue): All
groups except MSH caused varying degrees of
damage relative to control. Total cardiac
aconitase activity was inhibited in rats
receiving soluble Zn. Analysis of heart tissue
revealed modest changes in mRNA for genes
involved in signaling, ion channels function, oxi-
dative stress, mitochondrial fatty acid metabo-
lism, and cell cycle regulation in Zn, but not
MSH-exposed rats.
Reference: Kyoso M DE
etal. (2005,186998) pM and N0
x exposures
Species: Rat Particle Size: NR
Gender: NR
Strain: NR
Age: 15m
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: PM (mgfm3): 0.01,
0.109,0.54,1.09, 0.01 (from 1.09 con-
centration w/o PM)
NOx (ppm): 0.19, 0.59, 2.60, 5.53, 5.47 (w/o
PM)
Time to Analysis: Exposed 16h/d (from 5pm-
9am) for 7m
All of the resting R-R intervals before exposure
were lower at night than during the day, but
few changes were found after exposure.
Reference: Lei YC et
al. (2005, 088660)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Weight: 200-250g
(upon arrival)
Use: ip STZ (60 mg/kg
bw) dissolved in citric
acid buffer admin-
istered to 8 rats to
induce diabetes; ip
citric acid buffer
administered to 8 non-
diabetic rats
CAPs: Hsin-Chuang, Taipei
Particle Size: PM: 0.01 ¦ 2.5/jm
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: PM2.6: 200/yg in 0.5
mL saline. Components (/L/g/m3):
Organic Carbon (9.8-SD 2.4)),
Elemental Carbon (3.6-SD 3.2),
Sulfate (4.8-SD 1.2), Nitrate (6.3-SD 3.4)
Time to Analysis: Single dose. Animals
sacrificed 24h post instillation.
Effects of Diabetes: Body weight (bw) of
diabetic (D) rats (397.5g) was lower than non-
diabetic (ND) rats (483.1 g). Mean plasma
glucose level was 163 mg/dL in ND rats and
448.2 mg/dL in D rats. D rats had significant
greater levels of 8-OHdG in plasma compared to
ND rats. D rats had significantly increased
levels of plasma [nitrate+nitrite]. No observ-
able changes in TNF-a for D and ND rats.
Effects of PM Exposure ND Rats: Increase in
plasma levels of 8-OHdG and plasma IL-6, TNF-
a, and serum CRP. Significant reduction of
plasma [nitrate+nitrite]. No significant effect
on plasma ET-1.
Effects of PM Exposure STZ-D Rats:
Significant elevation of plasma ET-1. Decrease
in plasma [nitrate+nitrite] Plasma 8-OHdG and
TNF-a significantly increased. No significant
alterations in IL-6 and CRP.
Reference: Lemos M
et al. (2006, 088594)
Species: Mouse
Gender: NR
Strain: BALB/c
Age: 1d (neonatal)
n: 10
Weight: 4-6g
PM10, CO, NO2, and SO2 from
Universidade de Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Particle Size: PM10
Route: Inhalation via Whole-body exposure
Dose/Concentration: Mean (± SD)
concentrations were: CO2: 2.06 ± 0.08ppm
(8h mean); NO2: 104.75 ± 42.62/yg/m3 (24h
mean); SO2:11.07 ± 5.32/yg/m3 (24h mean);
PM10: 35.52 ± 12.84/yg/m3 (24h mean)
Time to Analysis: 24 h/d, 7d/wk for 4m
Morphometric measurements of the ratio
between the lumen and the wall (L/W) areas
were performed on transverse sections of
renal, pulmonary and coronary arteries. A
significant decrease of L/W with exposure to
air pollution was detected in pulmonary and
coronary arteries, whereas no effects of air
pollution were observed in renal vessels.
July 2009 D-12 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Li et al.
(2005, 088647)
Species: Human and
Rat
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley Rats
Tissues/Cell Types:
Cultured HPAECs;
Pulmonary Artery
Rings (PARs)
Urban Particles (UPs SRM 1648)
Major Constituents (mass fraction in
%): Al (3.4), Fe (3.9), K (1.1).
Minor Constituents (mass fraction in
%): Na (0.43), Pb (0.66), Zn (0.48).
Trace Constituents (ng/mg): As (115),
Cd (75), Cr (403), Cu (609),
Mn (786), Ni (82), Se (27), U (5.5),
V (127).
Particle Size: NR
Route: PARs: In vitro organ model HPAECs:
grown to 80% confluence
Dose/Concentration: PARs and HPAECs: 1
to 100 /yglmL; Losartan treatment: 0.2 /ymol
Captopril treatment: 100 /ymol
Time to Analysis: PARs were exposed to
increasing doses of UPs from 1 to 100/yglmL.
Maximum tension was recorded within 5min
after each UPs dose. HPAECs: exposed to
UPs from 1 to 100 /yglmL for up to 20min
Effects of UPs on the constriction of isolated
rat pulmonary PARs and the activation of
extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2
(ERK1/2I and p38 mitogen-activated protein
kinases (MAPKs) in HPAECs with or without
Losartan at 1 -100 //gf'niL induced acute
vasoconstriction. UPs also produced a time-
and dose-dependent increase in phosphorylation
of ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK. Losartan pre-treat-
ment inhibited both vasoconstriction and
activation of ERK1/2 and p38. The water
soluble fraction of UPs was sufficient for in-
ducing ERK1/2 and p38 phosphorylation, which
was also inhibited by Losartan. Cu (CuS04) and
V (VOSOi), induced pulmonary vasoconstriction
and phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and p38, but
only phosphorylation of p38 was inhibited by
Losartan. UPs induced activation of ERK1/2
and p38 was attenuated by Captopril.
Reference: Li et al.
(2006,156693)
Species: Rat, Rabbit,
and Human
Tissues/Cell Types:
Pulmonary Artery
Rings (PARs) (rat);
isolated buffer-infused
lungs (rabbits) and
cultured HPAECs
Strain: Sprague
Dawley Rats, New
Zealand White Rabbits
Weight: Rat: 200-
350g; Rabbit: 2.5-
3.0kg
Urban Particles (UPs SRM 1648).
Major Constituents (mass fraction in
%): Al (3.4), Fe (3.9), K (1.1).
Minor Constituents (mass fraction in
%): Na (0.43), Pb (0.66), Zn (0.48).
Trace Constituents (ng/mg): As (115),
Cd (76), Cr (403), Cu (609),
Mg (786), Ni (82), Se (27), U (5.5), V
(127).
Particle Size: NR
Route: In Vitro
Dose/Concentration: PARs and HPAECs: 1
to 100/yg/mL;
Time to Analysis: PARs: treatment given
15min prior to exposure. Exposed to
increasing doses of UPs from 1 to 100/yglmL.
Maximum tension was recorded within 5min
after each UPs dose. HPAECs: exposed to
UPs from 1 to 100 /yglmL for 20 and 120min.
Effects of UP on H2O2 release: Within
minutes after UPs treatment, HPAEC increased
H202 production that could be inhibited by DPI,
AP0, and NaN3. The water soluble fraction of
UPs as well as its two transition metal
components Cu and V, also stimulated H202
production. NaN3 inhibited H202 production
stimulated by Cu and V, whereas DPI and AP0
inhibited only Cu-stimulated H202 production.
Inhibitors of other H202-producing enzymes,
including N-methyl-L-arginine, indomethacin,
allopurinol, cimetidine, rotenone, and antimycin,
had no effects.
Effects of UP-induced H2O2 on MAPK
activation: DPI but not NaN3 attenuated UPs-
induced pulmonary vasoconstriction and
phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and p38 MAPKs.
Knockdown of p47phox gene expression by
small interfering RNA attenuated UPs-induced
H202 production and phosphorylation of
ERK1/2 and p38 MAPKs.
Reference: Lippmann
et al. (2005, 087453)
Species: Mouse
Strain: C57 and
ApoE'1'
(March-September 2003). Chemical
Composition: regional secondary
sulfate (SS) characterized by high S,
Si, and organic C; resuspended soil
(RS) characterized by high
concentrations of Ca, Fe, Al, and Si;
RO-fired powered emissions of the
Eastern U.S. identified by the
presence of V, Ni, and Se; and motor
vehicle (MV) traffic and other
sources. Contributors to Average
Mass: SS (56.1%), RS (11.7%), RO
combustion (1.4%), MV traffic and
other sources (30.9%)
Particle Size: PM2.6
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: PM2.6 concentrated
ten-fold, producing an average of 113/yg/m3
Time to Analysis: 6hfd, 5dfwk for 5m.
Parameters measured daily: during exposure,
the afternoon after exposure, and late at
night
Associations between sources and short-
term Heart Rate changes: There were no
significant associations betweeb SS, RS, R0,
and MV factors and HR in C57 mice at any of
the three intervals. There were significant as-
sociations between PM2.6 and the RS source
factor and decreases in HR for the ApoE'1' mice
during the daily CAPs exposures but no
associations with the other factors. There was
no residual association of HR with PM2.6 or the
RS factor later in the afternoon or late at night.
In the afternoon, there was a significant asso-
ciation between decreases in HR and the SS
factor for the ApoE'1' mice that had not been
present during exposure and did not persist into
the night time period. MV traffic and others
were not significantly associated with HR
during any of these three time periods. For the
C57 mice, there were no significant associa-
tions of HR with PM2.6 or any of its
components during any of the three daily time
periods.
Associations between sources and short-
term HRV changes: Signal noise during
exposures did not permit reliable analyses of
HRV changes during the hours of CAP
exposure.
July 2009 D-13 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Lippmann
et al. (2005, 087453)
Species: Mouse
Gender: NR
Strain: ApoE'1', ApoE'1'
LDLr'1', C57BL/6
Age: NR
Weight: NR
CAPs (Sterling Forest, spring-summer
2003)
Particle Size: PM2.6
Route: Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: PM2.6 average
concentration: 110 uglm3, Long-term
average: 19.7 /yglm
Time to Analysis: Exposed 6hfd, 5dfwk, 5 or
6m. Semicontinuous EKG recordings.
HR increased in ApoE'1'mice but not C57 mice.
HRF increased over the duration of the
experiment. Atherosclerotic plaque deposits
and coronary artery disease lesions occurred in
both CAPs-exposed mice and controls, but
invasive lesions were only present in CAPs-
exposed mice. A gene affecting circadian
rhythm was upregulated in double knockout
mice. CAPs activated NF-kB. No inflammation
occurred in the pulmonary system.
Reference: Lippman
M et al. (2006,
091165)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: ApoE'
Age: 6wks
CAPs from Tuxedo, NY. Component
of interest: Ni.
Particle Size: PM2.6
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: Average daily CAPs:
85.6/yglm3 Average daily Ni: 43 ng/m3
Time to Analysis: 6hfd, 5dfwk, for 6m (July
2004-January 2005). 10-second ECG, HR,
activity, and body temperature data were
sampled every 5min for the duration of the
experiment.
For the CAPs-exposed mice, on 14 days there
were Ni peaks at approximately 175 ngfm3 and
usually low CAPs and V. For those days back-
trajectory analysis identified a remote Ni point
source. ECG measurements on CAPs-exposed
and sham-exposed mice showed Ni to be
significantly associated with acute changes in
HR andHRV.
Reference: Lund et al.
(2007,125741)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: ApoE1
Age: 10wks
Use: Mice were
placed on a high fat at
the beginning of the
exposure.
Varying dilutions of gasoline emis-
sions: (generated using two 1996
model 4.3L General Motors V-6
engines, fueld with conventional,
unleaded, non-oxygenated gasoline,
equipped with stock exhaust
systems).
Composition for Hi, Med, and Lo
dilutions:
PM, NOx, CO, and Total
Hydrocarbons (THC)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: FA: PM (2 //gfnr1), NOx
(0 ppm), CO (0.1 ppm), HC (0.1 ppm);
Low (1: 90 dilution of exhaust): PM (8 /yglm3),
NOx (2 ppm), CO (9 ppm), HC (0.9 ppm);
Mid (1: 20): PM (39 //gfm3), NOx (12 ppm),
CO (50 ppm), HC (8.4 ppm);
High (1: 12): PM (61 //gfm3), NOx (19 ppm),
CO (80 ppm), HC (12 ppm);
High-filtered (1:12): PM (2 //gfm3), NOx (18
ppm), CO (80 ppm), HC (12.7 ppm).
Time to Analysis: 6hfd, 7dfwk for 7wks.
Mice were sacrificed within 16h PE. During
the study period all animals concurrently
exposed to the following: FA: 8 /yglm3 and 40
/yg/m3; PM Whole Exhaust: 60 //g|m3; or
Filtered Exhaust wf gases matching the 60
/yg/m3 concentration.
Inhalation exposure to gasoline engine
emissions resulted in increased aortic mRNA
expression of matrix metalloproteinase-3
(MMP-3), MMP-7, and MMP-9, tissue inhibitor
of MMP-2, ET-1 and HO-1 in ApoE'1' mice;
increased aortic MMP-9 protein levels were
confirmed through immunochemistry. Elevated
R0S were also observed in arteries from
exposed animals, despite absence of plasma
markers. Similar findings were also observed in
the aortas ApoE'1' mice exposed to particle
filtered atmosphere, implicating the gaseous
components of the whole exhaust in mediating
the expression of markers associated with
vasculopathy.
Reference:Lund AK
et al. (2009,191159)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: ApoE1
Age: 10wks
Weight: NR
GEE (conventional unleaded,
nonoxygenated, nonreformulated
gasoline- ChevronPhillips Specialty
Fuels Division)
Particle Size: PM: MMAD- 0.150
fj m
Route: Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: PM: 60//gfm3, NO2:
2ppm, NO: 16ppm, CO: 80ppm, THC:
12.7ppm
Time to Analysis: Mice fed high-fat diet 30d
before exposure. Exposed 6hfd, 1 or 7d. Some
groups dosed with Tempol or BQ-123. Killed
within 18h of last exposure.
Aorta gelatinase activity increased with GEE
exposure time. MMP-2/9 activity spread
throughout the vasculature by day 7. 7d GEE
exposure significantly increased the aorta
protein expression of MMP-9, MMP-2, TIMP-2,
and plasma MMP-9. Generally, in GEE-exposed
mice, Tempol decreased TBARS and vascular
ET-1, and BQ-123 decreased vascular ROS, ET-
1, MMP-9, and gelatinase activity.
Reference:Lund AK
et al. (2009,191159)
Species: Human
Gender: Male, Female
Strain: -
Age: 18-40yrs
Weight: NR
GEE (Cummins engine- 5.9L, 205hp,
at or near idle conditions,
ChevronPhillips- certified commercial
#2 fuel)
Particle Size: PM: MMAD-
0.10 ±0.02 /jm
Route: Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: PM: 100 //gfm3, NO2:
0.4ppm, NO: 3.5ppm, CO: 9ppm, THC:
0.9ppm
Time to Analysis: Exposed 2h on separate
occasions. 4 cycles of 15min rest then 15min
on exercise bike. Blood collected preexposure
and 30min and 24h postexposure. Plasma
samples collected.
GEE significantly increased plasma MMP-9
activity and concentration uniformly among the
subjects. DE significantly upregulated plasma
ET-1 and NOx.
Reference: Montiel-
Davalos et al.(2007,
156778)
Species: Human
Cell Types: HUVEC
(from primary human
endothelial cells) and
U937 (human
leukemia pro-
monocyte) cell
cultures.
PM2.6 and PM10 from Mexico City
Particle Size: PM2.6, PM10
Route: In Vitro
Dose/Concentration: HUVEC TNF-a (10
ng/mL), and a PM range of 5,10, 20, and 40
/yg/cm2 concentrations.
Time to Analysis: 6 or 24 h (early and late
adhesion molecules respectively)
Results showed that both PM2.6 and PM10
induced the adhesion of U937 cells to HUVEC,
and their maximal effect was observed at 20
/yglcm2. This adhesion was associated wf an in-
crease in the expression of all adhesion
molecules evaluated for PM10, and E-selectin,
P-selectin, and ICAM-1 for PM2.6. In general the
maximum expression of adhesion molecules in-
duced by PM2.6 and PM10 was obtained wI 20
fjglcm2; however PMio-induced expression was
observed from 5/yglcm2. E-selectin and ICAM-1
had the strongest expression in response to
particles.
July 2009 D-14 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Moyer et
al. (2002, 052222)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male and
Female
Strain: B6C3F1
In phosphide (InP), Co sulfate hep-
tahydrate (C0SO47H2O), Vanadium
pentoxide(V20E) Gallium arsenide
(GaAs), Ni oxide (NiO), Ni subsulfide
(NiiiSy], Ni sulfate hexahydrate
(NiSOi - 6H2O), talc, and Mo trioxide
((M0O3)
Particle Size: MMAD particle size
U/m): InP (1.1-1.3), C0SO47H2O (1.5-
1.8), V2OB: (1.0), GaAs: (1.0)
Route: Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: High-Dose Con-
centration in Chronic Studies, Male (/^glm3):
InP: 0.3, C0SO47H2O: 3.0, V2O1,: 4.0, GaAs:
1.0
High-Dose Concentration in Sub-Chronic
Studies, Male or Female (/^glm3): InP: 100,
C0SO47H2O: 30, V20b: 16, GaAs: 75
Time to Analysis: Phase One: Evaluation of
heart, kidney and lung tissues from all control
and high dose male B6C3F1 mice exposed by
inhalation to 9 particulate compounds for a
2yr period. Phase Two: evaluated heart, lung,
kidney and mesentery tissues of control and
high dose male and female B6C3F1 mice from
the 90d studies of the 4-compounds demon-
strating arteritis after a 2yr period.
Phase One: High-dose males developed signifi-
cantly increased incidences of arteritis over
controls in 2 of the 9 studies (InP and
C0SO47H2O), while marginal increases of
arteritis were detected in 2 additional studies
(V20Eand GaAs). In contrast, arteritis of the
muscular arteries of the lung was not observed.
Morphological features of arteritis in these
studies included an influx of mixed inflamma-
tory cells including neutrophils, lymphocytes,
and macrophages. Partial and complete
effacement of the normal vascular wall archi-
tecture, often with the extension of the
inflammatory process into the periarterial con-
nective tissue, was observed.
Phase Two: Results showed that arteritis did
not develop in the 90-day studies, suggesting
that long-term chronic exposure to lower-dose
metallic PM may be necessary to induce or
exacerbate arteritis.
Reference: Mutlu GM
et al. (2007,121441)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: 57BL/6
(IL6+I+ and IL61)
Age: 6-8wks
Weight: 20-25g
PM in from ambient air in Dusseldorf,
Germany
Particle Size: PM10
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: PM10: 10//g;
Clodronate: 120mg
Time to Analysis: For alveolar macro|
depletion, clodronate instilled into mice lungs
following endotracheal intubation 48h prior to
instillation of PM. Parameters measured 24h
post-exposure.
Mice treated with PM10 exhibited a shortened
bleeding time, decreased prothrombin and
partial thromboplastin times (decreased plasma
clothing times), increased levels of fibrinogen,
and increased activity of factors II, VIII, and X.
This prothrombotic tendency was associated
with increased generation of intravascular
thrombin, an acceleration of arterial
thrombosis, and an increase in BALF concentra-
tion of prothrombotic IL-6. IL-6'1' mice were
protected against PM-induced intravascular
thrombin formation and the acceleration of
arterial thrombosis. Depletion of macrophages
by the IT administration of liposomal clodronate
attenuated PM-induced IL-6 production and the
resultant prothrombotic tendency.
Reference: Nadziejko
et al. (2002, 050587)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SH Wistar
Kyoto
Age: 16wks
CAPs (PM2.6) from Tuxedo, NY. (SO2,
NO2 0:i and NH3 were removed prior
to exposure).
H2SO4 (fine and ultrafine)
Particle Size: Ultrafine H2SO4 mass
median diameter: 50-75nm
Route: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: CAPs: 80 and 66
/yglm3 (avg 73); Fine H2SO4: 299, 280,119,
and 203//g|m3 (avg 225); Ultrafine H2SO4:
140, 565,416, 750/yglm3 (avg 468)
Time to Analysis: 4h/exposure
Exposure to CAPs caused a striking decrease in
respiratory rate that was apparent soon after
the start of exposure and stopped when
exposure to CAPs ceased. The decrease in
respiratory rate was accompanied by a
decrease in HR. Exposure of the same animals
to fine-particle-size sulfuric acid aerosol also
caused a significant decrease in respiratory
rate similar to the effect of CAPs. Ultrafine
acid had the opposite effect on respiratory rate
compared to CAPs.
Reference: Naziejko
C et al. (2004,
055632)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: F344
Age: 18m
PM/CAPs (Tuxedo, NY)
UFC (lab generated)
SO2
Particle Size: PM (Size Range): 0.5-
2.5um; UFC (MMAD): 30-50nm
Route: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: PM (/^gfm3): 161-200,
avg. 180; UFC (^g|m3): 500-1280, avg. 890;
SO2 (ppm): 1.2,1.2, avg. 1.2
Time to Analysis: A total of 8 exposures
were performed: 2 exposures to CAPs, 2
exposures to UFC, 4 exposures to SO2. All
three pollutants were tested wf a crossover
design so that each group alternated exposure
to air and to pollutant. Exposures lasted 4h
and were performed at least 1wk apart.
Parameters measured throughout duration of
experiment.
Old F344 rats had many spontaneous
arrhythmias. There was a significant increase
in the frequency of irregular and delayed beats
after exposure to CAPs. The same rats were
subsequently exposed to UFC, SO2 or air with
repeated crossover design. In these
experiments there was no significant change in
the frequency of any category of spontaneous
arrhythmia following exposure to UFC or SO2.
Reference: Nemmar DEP (SRM 2975)
et al. (2008, 096566)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar Kyoto
Weight: 440 ± 14g
Particle Size: < 1 fjm
Route: Intravenous via the tail vein
Dose/Concentration: DEP: 0.02mg or 0.1mg
DEP/kg (corresponding to about 8 //g or 44
/yg DEP/rat)
Time to Analysis: 48h following systemic
administration of saline or DEP
Intravenous administration of DEP (0.1 mg/kg)
triggered systemic inflammation characterized
by an increase in monocyte an granulocyte
numbers. Both doses of DEP caused a
reduction of RBC numbers and hemoglobin con-
centration. TEM analysis of RBC safter in vitro
incubation (5 //gj'niL] or in vivo administration
of DEP, revealed the presence of ultrafine-sized
aggregates of DEP within the RBC. Larger
aggregates were also taken up by the RBC. The
myocardial morphology and capillary bed were
not affected by DEP exposure.
July 2009 D-15 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Nemmar A DEP (SRM 2975)
et al. (2007,156800) partjc|e size: NR
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar Kyoto
Age: 16wks
Weight: 424 ± 8g
Route: Tail Vein Injection
Dose/Concentration: 8, 42, or 212 //g
DEP/rat (150ul of 0.02, 0.1, or 0.5 mg/kg bw)
Time to Analysis: 24h
Effect of DEP on Blood Pressure: Significant
decrease on BP in DEP-exposed rats at doses
of 0.02 mg/kg bw, compared with mean BP
observed in controls.
Effect of DEP onHR: Doses of 0.02, 0.1, and
0.5 mg/kg bw in rats, resulted in significant
reduction of HR compared to controls.
Effect of DEP on Tail Bleeding Time:
Shortening of tail bleeding time in rats exposed
to 0.02, 0.1, and 0.5 mg/kg bw. The shortening
was significant at the dose of 0.02 and 0.5
mg/kg compared w/ controls. Platelet counts in
blood did not significantly increased post-DEP
administration.
Effect of DEP on WBC and RBC numbers:
No significant effect of DEP at doses of 0.02,
0.1 and 0.5 mg/kg on the numbers of
granulocytes, monocytes, or lymphocytes
compared with control.
Reference: Nemmar
et al. (2003, 096567)
Species: Hamster
Gender: Male and
Female
Weight: 100-110g
DEP (SRM 1650)
Particle Size: NR
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 120 /yl (5, 50, or 500
/yg/animal)
Time to Analysis: ln-vivo: formation and
embolization of thrombus were continuously
monitored for 40min. Ex-vivo: animals were
ITly instilled w/ DEPs (0 or 50 /yg per animal),
and blood was collected 5,15, 30, and 60min
post-instillation. In-vitro: Saline or saline-
containing DEPs (0.1, 0.5,1, and 5/yg/mL)
was added to venous blood from untreated
hamsters, and closure time was measured in
the PFA-100 after 5min/animal.
Doses of 5 - 500 /yg enhanced experimental
arterial and venous platelet-rich thrombus
formation in vivo. Blood samples taken from
hamsters 30 and 60 min after instillation of 50
/yg of DEPs yielded accelerated aperture
closure (platelet activation) ex-vivo, when
analyzed in the PFA-100. The direct addition of
as little as 0.5 /yg/mL DEPs to untreated
hamster blood significantly shortened closure
time in vitro.
Reference: Nemmar
et al. (2004, 087959)
Species: Hamster
Gender: Male and
Female
Weight: 100-110g
DEP (SRM 1650); Positively Charged
Polystyrene Particles (PCPSP)
Particle Size: PCPSP: 400 nm; DEP:
NR
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: DEP: 50 /yg/animal, or
PCPSP: 500/yg/animal
Time to Analysis: Pretreatment Phase:
Hamsters were pretreated w/ Dexametasone
IP (5mg/kg) or IT (0.1 or 0.5mg/kg) or Sodium
Cromoglycate given IP (40mg/kg), 1h before
DEP or vehicle instillation. Thrombosis: In-vivo
thrombogenesis assessed 24h post-instillation
of DEP or vehicle.
DEP increased thrombosis without elevating
plasma vWF. The IT instillation of PCPSP
equally produced histamine release and
enhanced thrombosis. Histamine in plasma
resulted from basophil activation. IP
pretreatment with Dexametasone abolished the
DEP-induced histamine increase in BALF and
plasma and abrogated airway inflammation and
thrombogenicity. The IT pretreatment with
Dexametasone showed a partial but parallel
inhibition of all these parameters. Pretreatment
with Sodium Cromoglycate strongly inhibited
thrombogenicity, and histamine release.
Reference: Nemmar
et al. (2003, 097487)
Species: Hamster
Gender: Male and
Female
Weight: 100-110g
Ultrafine Particles: Unmodified
Polystyrene Particles (UPSPs); Nega-
tively Charged Carboxylate-Modified
Polystyrene Particles (NCC-MPSPs);
Positively-Charged Amine Modified
Polystyrene Particles (PCA-MPSPs)
Particle Size: UPSPs: 60nm; NCC-
MPSPs: 60nm; PCA-MPSPs: 60 or
400nm
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 5, 50, and 500
/yg/animal in 120 ul saline
Time to Analysis: 1 h post-instillation
Unmodified and negative UFPs did not modify
thrombosis. Positive UFPs increased
thrombosis at 500 and 50 /yg/animal, but not
at 5 /yg/animal. Positive 400 nm particles (500
/yg/animal) did not affect thrombosis. PFA-100
analysis showed that platelets were activated
by the in-vitro addition of positive UFPs and
400 nm particles to blood.
Reference: Nemmar
et al. (2003, 087931)
Species: Hamster
Weight: 100-110g
DEP (SRM 1650)
Particle Size: NR
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 50 /yg/animal in 120 ul
saline
Time to Analysis: 1, 3, 6, and 24h
At 1, 6, and 24 h after instillation of 50 /yg
DEPs, the mean size of in vivo induced and
quantified venous thrombosis was increased by
480, 770, and 460%, respectively. Platelets
activation in blood was confirmed by a short-
ened closure time in the PFA-100 analyzer. In
plasma, histamine was increased only at 6 and
24 h. Pre-treatment with a H1 receptor
antagonist (diphenhydramine, 30 mg/kg
intraperitoneally) did not affect DEP-induced
thrombosis or platelet activation at 1 h;
however both were markedly reduced at 6 and
24 h.
July 2009 D-16 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Niwa et
al. (2007, 091309)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: LDLR/KO
Age, Use: 6 weeks (n
- 20), IT CB
dispersion; 10-14wks
acute effect of CB
dispersion on
circulating CRP
Carbon Black
Particle Size: 23-470nm (mean size
120.7nm)
Route: IT Dispersion
Dose/Concentration: IT CB Dispersion
Study: 1 mg per animal/week; Acute Effect of
CB Dispersion on Circulating CRP Study:
1 mg/animal (single administration)
Time to Analysis: IT CB Dispersion Study:
1x/wk for 10wks;
Acute Effect of CB Dispersion on Circulating
CRP Study: Single CB administration, blood
samples collected 24h post-administration
IT CB Dispersion Study: Although no
difference in body weight (bw) between the
four groups was observed at baseline, and all
mice experienced an increase in bw with
advancing age, the mice treated with CB
tended to be smaller than those treated with
vehicle (air). No significant differences were
observed in cholesterol and TG levels among
the for groups. Development of aortic lipid-rich
lesions occurred in mice under a 0.51 %
cholesterol diet with or without CB infusion,
but not in the mice fed a 0% cholesterol diet.
Acute Effect of CB Dispersion on
Circulating CRP Study: Circulating levels of
CRP were significantly higher in mice exposed
to CB versus those exposed to air, indicating an
acute inflammatory response. Although the
presence of CB in pulmonary macrophage-like
cells in CB treated mice under 0.51%
cholesterol diet was confirmed, CB was not
detected in aortas, livers, kidneys, or spleens.
Reference: Niwa et
al. (2007, 091309)
Species: Mouse
Cell Types:
Macrophages Cell
Lines (RAW264.7)
Carbon Black (CB); Water-Soluble
Fullerene
(C60(0H)24); Fluoresbrite
Carboxylate Microspheres; 0x-LDL;
Acetylated-LDL
Particle Size: Carbon Black and
C6o(OH)24: 7.1 nm (SD 2.4);
Fluoresbrite Carboxylate
Microspheres: 6nm
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: CB: 1,10,100/yg|mL;
C6o(OH)24: 20, 10Ong/mL
Time to Analysis: RAW264.7 +CB
for 24h, 13d, and 50d;
RAW264.7 +C60(0H)24 for 24h or 10d;
RAW264.7 +C60(0H)24 for 8d, then co-
treated wf Ox-LDL for an additional 48h;
RAW264.7 -t-Ox-LDL for 5d, and then co-
cultured wI C60(0H|24 for an additional 48h;
RAW264.7 + 6nm beads: 3d, the Ox-LDL or
acetylated-LDL added for 24h
CB alone had no significant effects on
RAW264.7 cell growth. C60(0H)24 alone or CB
and C60(0H)24 together wI Ox-LDL induced
cytotoxic morphological changes, such as Ox-
LDL uptake-induced foam cell-like formation
and decreased cell growth, in a dose-dependent
manner. C60(0H)24 induced L0X-1 protein
expression, pro-matrix metalloprotease-9
protein secretion, and tissue factor mRNA
expression in lipid-laden macrophages. Although
CB or C60(0H)24 alone did not induce platelet
aggregation, C60(0H)24 facilitated ADP-
induced platelet aggregation. C60(0H)24 also
acted as a competitive inhibitor of ADP
receptor antagonists in ADP-mediated platelet
aggregation.
Reference: Niwa Y et
al. (2008,156812)
Species: Rat
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Age: 6wks
CB from Kyoto, Japan
Particle Size: Mean size (nm) ± SD
determined at 1, 8,15, 22, and 29d
post-exposure was 118.1 ± 2.4,
119.1 ± 2.7,122.2 ± 2.0,122.4 ±
2.5 and 121.0 ± 3.6 respectively
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 15.6 ± 3.5mgfm3
Time to Analysis: 6hfd, 5dfwk, for a total of
4wks. BP and HR were measured by tail-cuff
plethysmography at 1,14, and 28d post ¦
exposure. Sacrificed At 1, 7,14, 28, and 30d
post-exposure
Although the presence of CB was confirmed in
pulmonary macrophages, electron microscopic
survey did not detect CB in other tissues
including, liver, spleen and aorta. CB exposure
raised blood pressure levels in a exposure-time
dependent manner. Levels of circulating
inflammatory marker proteins, including
monocyte chemo attractant protein-1, IL-6,
andCRP, were higher in the CB treated groups
than in control groups.
Reference:
Nurkiewicz TR et al.
(2004, 087968)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Age: 7-8wks
R0FA (from Everett, MA) Major metal
contaminants are: Fe, Al, V, Ni, Ca,
and Z. Main soluble metals are: Al,
Ni, and Ca.
Particle Size: R0FA mean count
diameter: 2.2 /jm
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: R0FA group: 0.1, 0.25,
1, or 2mgfrat. Vehicle control group: 300 ul
saline. Particle control group: Ti02
0.25mg/rat.
Time to Analysis: After single IT instillation
of a particular dose, all rats recovered for
24h.
Saline Treated Rats: A23187 dilated
arterioles up to 72 ± 7% max.
ROFA and Ti02 Exposed Rats: A23187-
induced dilation was significantly attenuated.
Sensitivity of Arteriolar Smooth Muscle to
NO: Similar in saline treated and ROFA exposed
rats.
Other: Significant increase in venular leuko-
cyte-adhesion and rolling observed in ROFA
exposed rats.
July 2009 D-17 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Nurkiewicz et al.
(2006,088611)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Aqe: 7-8wks
ROFA from Everett, MA
Particle Size: ROFA mean count
diameter: 2.2 /jm; Ti02 mean
diameter: 1.0 /jm
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: ROFA group: 0.1 or
0.25 mg/rat. Vehicle control group: 300 ul
saline. Particle control group: Ti02 0.1 or 0.25
mg/rat.
Time to Analysis: After single IT instillation
of a particular dose, all rats recovered for
24h.
ROFA or Ti02 Exposure and Arteriolar
Dilation: Exposure caused a dose-dependent
impairment of endothelium-dependent arteriolar
dilation.
ROFA or Ti02 Exposure and Arteriolar
Constriction: Exposure did not affect
microvascular constriction in response to PHE.
ROFA and Ti02 and Leukocyte Rolling and
Adhesion: Exposure significantly increased
leukocyte rolling and adhesion in aired venules,
and these cells were identified as PMN
leukocytes.
ROFA and Ti02 and MPO: MP0 was found in
PMN leukocytes, adhering to the systemic mi-
crovascular wall. Evidence suggests that some
of this MPO had been deposited in the
microvascular wall. There was also evidence of
oxidative stress in the microvascular wall.
Reference:
Nurkiewicz TR et al.
(2008,156816)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SD
Age: 6-7wks
Weight: NR
Ti02 (DeGussa, Sigma-Aldrich;
powders put through fluidized-bed
aerosol generator)
Particle Size: Fine- 1 fjm, UF- 21 nm
Route: Whole-body Exposure
Dose/Concentration: Concentrations: Fine-
3-16mg/m3; UF- 1.5-12mg/m3; Dose: Fine- 8,
20, 36, 67, 90 //g; UF- 4, 6,10,19, 30 //g
Time to Analysis: Acclimated 5d. Exposed 4-
12h. Sacrificed 24h postexposure.
Particle accumulation within AMs, anuclear
macrophages, particle-laden AMs intimately
associated with the alveolar wall were all
present in exposed rats. Calcium ionophore
impaired arteriolar dilation in a dose-dependent
manner in UF and fine exposed rats. UF
produced greater systemic microvascular
dysfunction. Microvascular dysfunction was
the same for three groups of rats exposed to
30 /yg UF Ti02 under different conditions.
Reference:
Nurkiewicz et al.
(2009,191961)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SD
Age: 7-8wks
Weight: NR
Fine Ti02 (Sigma-Aldrich- (titanium
(IV)) oxide, 224227, St. Louis, M0)
( — 99% rutile)
TiOy nanoparticles (DeGussa-
Aeroxide Ti02 P25, Parsippany, NJ)
(80% anatase, 20% rutile)
Particle Size: Fine Ti02- Primary
size: < 5 /jm, MMAD: 402nm, CMD:
710nm; Nano-Ti02- Primary size:
21nm, MMAD: 138nm, CMD: 100nm
Route: Aerosol Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 1.5-16mgfm3
Time to Analysis: Acclimated 5d. Exposed
240-720min. Anesthetized 24h postexposure.
Intravital microscopy, NO measurement,
microvascular oxidative stress measurement,
nitrotyrosine staining.
Arteriolar Dilation: Nano-Ti02 significantly
impaired endothelium-dependent arteriolar
dilation. Equivalent levels of arteriolar
dysfunction were found in fine and nano-Ti02.
Arteriolar dilation in response to abluminal
microiontophretic application of SNP was not
different from the controls or between the
exposure groups. Arteriolar dilation was
partially restored by radical scavenging with
TEMP0L and catalase, NADPH oxidase with
apocynin, and MPO inhibition with ABAH.
Microcirculation: R0S increased in both
groups. Nano-Ti02 significantly increased the
area of tissue containing nitrotyrosine in the
lung and spinotrapezius microcirculation.
NO: Fine and nano-Ti02 significantly and dose-
dependently decreased stimulated NO
production in isolated microvessels. NO
production was increased by radical scavenging
with TEMP0L and catalase or NADPH oxidase
with apocynin, and was largest in the fine Ti02
group.
July 2009 D-18 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Okayama
et al. (2006,156824)
Species: Rat
Cell Type: Ventricular
Cardiac Myocytes
from Wistar Rats, ap-
proximately 3d old
DEP (Tsukuba, Japan)
DEPE: 5g of DEP in 5 mL PBS
containing 0.05% Tween 80.
Others: Catalase, LDH, MPG and
SOD.
Particle Size: DEP mass median
diameter: 0.34 /ym.
Route: In Vitro
Dose/ Concentration: DEPE: 0-100 /yg/mL;
MPG: 0-1 mM; SOD: 800 U|mL: Catalase:
500 U/mL
Time to Analysis: Long-Term Exposure to
DEPE: cells were incubated for 24 or 48h.
Short-Term Exposure to DEPE: 1, 2, 4, or 8 h
and then medium containing DEPE was
replaced by serum-free medium, and incubated
for an additional 24 h.
LDH Activity of Supernatant: 24 h post-DEPE
exposure.
SOD, Catalase, MPG on DEPE-induced
Toxicity: SOD, catalase or MPG was added to
cells w/ or w/o DEPE & incubated for 4 or
24h. Medium then replaced wfserum-free &
cells incubated for another 24h to analysis.
Cytotoxic Effects of DEPE on Cardiac
Myocytes: DEPE above 20 /yg/mL damaged
cardiac myocytes in a time and concentration-
dependent manner in both long- and short-term
exposure conditions. However damage was
greater after long-term exposure. LDH activity
showed a concentration-dependent increase at
higher levels of exposure (greater than 20
/yg/mL).
Effects of ROS Scavenging Enzymes and
Antioxidant on DEPE-induced Cell Damage:
SOD or catalase attenuated 50 /yg/mL DEPE-
induced cell damage compared with DEPE-
treated groups lacking antioxidant enzymes.
Co-incubation with SOD and catalase showed
more protective effects towards DEPE-induced
cell damage, although these effects were not
statistically significant from cells treated with
SOD only. MPG attenuated 50 /yg/mL DEPE-
induced cell damage in a concentration-
dependent manner in both long and short-term
exposure conditions. Especially in long-term
exposure MPG showed strong protective
effects against DEPE-induced cell damage. Cell
viability was not affected by SOD, catalase, or
MPG.
Reference: Proctor et
al. (2006, 088480)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Age: 12wks
Use: Thoracic Aorta
from cp/cp and +/?
Male Rats
cp/cp - homozygous
for cp gene. Prone to
obesity and insulin
resistant.
+/? - heterozygous
for either +/cp or
+/+. Lean and
metabolically normal.
R0FA from Birmingham, AL
Particle Size: 1.95 ± 0.18/ym
aerodynamic diameter of R0FA
Route: Protocol 1: Used two aorta rings per
each experimental treatment group (4 groups
total). Protocol 2: Used four rings.
Dose/Concentration: Protocol 1: exposed to
12.5/yg/mL R0FA-L (at 10mg/mL).
Protocol 2: exposed to 1.56, 3.25, 6.26,12.5
/yg/mL R0FA-L (at 10mg/mL).
Time to Analysis: Protocol 1: Cells treated
with 12.5/yg/mL R0FA-L and/or 104mol/L L-
NAME for 20min
Protocol 2: Parameters measured after R0FA-
L only treatment
Contractile response to phenylephrine (PE)
was measured
R0FA-L (12.5/yg/mL) increased PE-mediated
contraction in obese, but not in lean rat aortae.
Effect was exacerbated by L-NAME, and it
reduced ACh-mediated relaxation in obese and
lean aortae. Initial exposure of aortae to R0FA-
L caused a small contractile response, which
was markedly greater on second exposure in
the obese aortae but marginal in lean.
Reference: Radomski
A et al. (2005,
091377)
Species: Rat Strain:
Wistar-Kyoto
Use: Vascular
Thrombosis
Carbon Nano Particles (CNPs)
(purchased from SES Research,
Houston, TX): Multiplewall
Nanotubes (MWNT); Singlewall
Nanotubes (SWNT); C60 Fullerenes
(C60CS); Mixed Carbon
Nanoparticles (MCN)
PM: (SRM1648) (NIST)
Particle Size: CNPs: NR;PM:1.4
//m average size
Route: Simultaneous single PM injection into
femoral vein as FeCh injected to induce
carotid thrombosis
Dose/Concentration: 0.5 mL suspension of
50/yg/mL of PM in 0.9% NaCI solution.
Time to Analysis: Blood flow continuously
monitored for 900 seconds.
Vascular Thrombosis: FeCh induced carotid
artery thrombosis and MCN had an amplifying
effect in the development of thrombosis.
Infusions of MCN, SWNT, and MWNT signifi-
cantly accelerated the time and rate of
development of carotid artery thrombosis in
rats. SRM1648 was less effective than CNPs
in inducing thrombosis, while C60CS exerted
no significant effect on the development of
vascular thrombosis.
Reference: Radomski
A et al. (2005,
091377)
Species: Human
Cell Types: Platelets
Use: Human |
aggregation
Carbon Nano Particles (CNPs)
(purchased from SES Research,
Houston, TX): Multiplewall
Nanotubes (MWNT); Singlewall
Nanotubes (SWNT): C60 Fullerenes
(C60CS); Mixed Carbon
Nanoparticles (MCN);
PM (SRM1648)
Particle Size: CNPs: NR;PM:1.4
//ni average size
Route: Cell Culture (2.5X108 platelets/mL)
Dose/Concentration: CNPs: 0.2-300/yg/mL;
PM: 5 ¦ 300 /yg/mL
Time to Analysis: Prostacyclin (PGI2), S-ni-
troso-glutathione (GSN0), aspirin, 2-methyl-
thio-AMP, phenanthroline, EDTA and Go6976
were pre-incubated w/ platelets fori min
before particle addition. Particles added to
platelets and platelet aggregation studied for
8min.
Platelet Aggregation: All CNPs, except
C60CS, stimulated platelet aggregation (MCN
> SWNT > MWNT > SRM1648). All particles
resulted in upregulation of GPIIb/llla in
platelets. In contrast, particles differentially
affected the release of platelet granules, as
well as the activity of thromboxane-, ADP,
matrix metalloproteinase- and protein kinase C-
dependent pathways of aggregation. Particle-
induced aggregation was inhibited by
prostacyclin and GSN0, but not by aspirin.
July 2009 D-19 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Reed MD
et al. (2008,156903)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male, Female
Strain: CDF
(F344)/CrlBR, SHR
Age: NR
Weight: NR
GEE (two 1996 General Motors 4.3-L
V-6 engines; regular, unleaded, non-
oxygenated, non-reformulated
Chevron-Phillips gasoline, U.S.
average consumption for summer
2001 and winter 2001-2002)
Particle Size: MMAD: 150nm
Route: Inhalation Exposure Chamber
Dose/Concentration: PM: Low- 6.6±3.7
/yg/m3, Medium- 30.3±11.8/yg/m3, High-
59.1 ±28.3 //g/m3
Time to Analysis: 2wk quarantine period in
chamber. Exposed 6h/d, 7d/wk, 3d-6m. SHR-
surgery to implant telemeter in peritoneal
cavity. 4wks recovery. ECG data obtained
every 15min beginning 3d preexposure, 7d
exposure, 4d postexposure.
Organ Weight: At 6m exposure, the heart
weights of male and female rats increased and
male rats' seminal vesicle weight decreased.
Histopathology: PM-containing macrophages
increased by 6m.
Serum Chemistry: Serum alanine
aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase,
and phosphorus decreased in medium and high-
exposure females.
Hematology, Clotting Factors: Hematocrit,
red blood cell count, and hemoglobin dose-
dependently increased for both genders at both
time points. Plasma fibrinogen increased at
1wk in males.
Lung DNA Damage: Hypermethylation
occurred in medium- and high-exposure male
rats at 6m.
BAL: For both genders in the high-exposure
group, LDH and MIP-2 significantly increased at
6m. R0S decreased at 1wk and 6m. Generally,
the production of hydrogen peroxide and
superoxide decreased in the high-exposure
group and medium- and high-exposure groups,
respectively.
CV effects in SHR: Lipid peroxides were
significantly increased in males in the high
exposure group. TAT complexes decreased in
females in the high exposure group.
Removal of Emission PM: The removal of
emission PM strongly linked PM to increased
seminal vesicle weight, red blood cell counts,
LDH, lipid peroxides, and methylation.
Reference: Rhoden et
al. (2005, 087878)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Age:A dult
Weight: 300g
Urban Ambient Particles (UAPs):
SRM-1649; CAPs (from Boston, MA)
Particle Size: NR
Route: UAPs: IT Instillation. CAPs: Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: UAPs: 750 /yg
suspended in 300 ul saline; CAPs: 700 ± 180
//g/m3
Time to Analysis: UAPs: 30min post-instil-
lation. CAPs: immediately after 5h exposure
period
Oxidative Stress and HR Function: UAPs
instillation led to significant increases in heart
oxidants. HRincreased immediately after
exposure and returned to basal levels over the
next 30 min. SDNN was unchanged
immediately after exposure, but significantly in-
creased during the recovery phase.
Role of ROS in Cardiac malfunction: Rats
were treated with 50 mg/kg NAC 1 h prior to
UAPs instillation or CAPs inhalation. NAC
prevented changes in heart rate and SDNN in
UAPs-exposed rats.
Role of the Autonomic Nervous System in
PM-induced Oxidative Stress: Rats were
given 5 mg/kg atenolol, 0.30 mg/kg gly-
copyrrolate, or saline immediately before CAPs
exposure. Both atenolol and glycopyrrolate
effectively prevented CAPS-induced cardiac
oxidative stress.
Reference: Rivero DH
et al. (2005, 088653)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar
Age: 3m
Weight: ~250g
PM2.6, collected from heavy traffic
area in Sao Paulo, Brazil. PM2.6
Composition (%): S (3.05), As (0.30),
Br (0.21), CI (2.09), Co (2.65), Fe
(2.67), La (5.42), Mn (0.64), Sb
(0.21), Sc (3.25), Th (8.14)
Particle Size: PM2.6
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 100 or 500 /yg of
PM2.6.
Time to Analysis: 24h post-instillation
Blood: Total reticulocytes significantly
increased at both PM2.6 doses, while
hematocrit levels increased in the 500 /yg
group. Quantification of segmented neutrophils
and fibrinogen levels showed a significant
decrease, while lymphocytes counting
increased with 100 /yg of PM2.6.
Pulmonary vasculature: Significant dose-de-
pendent decrease of intra-acinar pulmonary
arteriole lumen/wall ratio was observed in both
PM2.6 groups.
Wet-to Dry Weight Ratio: Significant
increase in heart wet-to-dry weight ratio was
observed in the 500 /yg group.
July 2009 D-20 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Rodriquez
Ferreira Rivero DH et
al. (2005, 088659)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar
Age: 3m
Weight: — 250g
PM2.6, collected from heavy traffic
area in Sao Paulo, Brazil. PM2.6
Composition (%): S (3.05), As (0.30),
Br (0.21), CI (2.09), Co (2.65),
Fe (2.67), La (5.42), Mn (0.64),
Sb (0.21), Sc (3.25), Th (8.14)
Particle Size: PM2.6
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 50 and 100/yg of
PM2.6.
Time to Analysis: HR and SDNN were
assessed immediately before instillation, 30
and 60min post-instillation.
HR decreased significantly with time, but no
significant effect of treatment or interaction
between time and treatment was observed. In
contrast, there was a significant SDNN
interaction between time and treatment. The
SDNN decreased 60 min after instillation with
PM2.5 concentration of 50 and 100 /yg.
Reference: Seagrave
et al. (2008,191990)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SD
Age: 10-12wks
Weight: 250-300g
GEE (2 1996 General Motors 4.3-L
V6 gasoline engines; conventional
Chevron Phillips gasoline, U.S.
average composition) (CO, NO, NO2,
SO2, THC) (PM2.6 composition- EC,
OC, S04, NH4, NOs)
Simulated downwind coal emission
atmospheres (SDCAs) (fly ash, gas-
phase pollutants, sulfate aerosols,
NO, NO2, SO2)
Paved Road Dust (RD) (Los Angeles,
CA; New York City, NY; Atlanta, GA)
Particle Size: GEE: MMAD- 150nm,
RD: 2.6±1.7 fjm, SDCA: 0.1-1.0//m
Route: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: GEE: 60 //gfm3,
SDCAs: 317-1072//g/m3, RD: 306-954
/yg/m3; GEE: CO- 104ppm, NO- 16.7ppm, N02-
1.1ppm, S02- 1.0ppm,THC- 12ppm; SDCAs:
CO- < 1 ppm, NO- 0.19-0.62ppm, N02- 0.10-
0.37ppm, S02- 0.07-0.24ppm, THC- < 1ppm
Time to Analysis: Quarantined 2wks. 6h
exposure then ip injected. Cannula ligated into
trachea and connected to rodent ventilator.
Thorax and abdomen opened. Killed after
measurements taken.
GEE produced CL in the lungs, heart, and liver.
RD produced a significant effect in the heart at
the low dose. SDCAs had no effect on CL. RD
significantly increased the heart's oxidative
stress, as demonstrated by the TBARS levels.
GEE did not affect the amount of macrophages
or PMN. SDCAs increased macrophages. The
RD low dose increased macrophages and PMN.
SDCAs increased Pur* values and tidal volumes.
Reference:
Simkhovich et al.
(2007, 096594)
Species: Rat
Gender: Female
Strain: Fischer 344 x
Brown Norway hybrid
Age: 4, 26 m
Use: Study performed
in isolated Langen-
dorff-perfused rat
hearts
Ultra Fine Particles (UFPs) isolated
from industrial diesel reference PM
2975
Particle Size: UFPs ~ 0.1 /jm
Route: Heart Perfusion (ex-vivo)
Dose/Concentration: UFPs 12.5, 25, and
37.5 mg.
Time to Analysis: Hearts perfused wI UFPs
for 30 minutes and analysis conducted every
10min.
Young adult and old hearts demonstrated equal
functional deterioration in response to direct
infusion of UFPs. Developed pressure in young
adult UFPs-treated hearts fell from 101 ± 4 to
68 ± 8 mmHg. In the old UFPs-treated hearts
developed pressure fell by 35%. Positive dP/dt
was equally affected in the young adult and old
UFPs-treated hearts and was decreased by
28% in both groups.
Reference: Sun ~ et
al. (2005,186814)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: ApoE1
Aqe: 16wks
CAPs: PM2.6 from Tuxedo, NY.
HFCD: High Fat Chow Diet
NCD: Normal Chow Diet
Particle Size: PM2.6
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: PM2.6: 85//gfm:l; Daily
concentration: 10.6 (SD 3.4) //g|m3 (mean)
Average exposure over 6 mth period: 15.2
/yg/m3.
Time to Analysis: Study diets fed for at
least 10wk prior to exposure to PM2.6 or FA.
Exposed for 6h/d, 5d/wk for 6m. Sacrificed
15-47d after exposure.
Vasomotor Function: Mice fed HFCD and
exposed to PM2.6 demonstrated an increase in
the half-maximal dose for dilation to ACh with
no changes in peak relaxation compared to the
mice exposed to FA and fed HFCD and NCD.
Atherosclerosis Burden with PM2.5: In vivo
MRI imaging of atherosclerosis burden in the
abdominal aorta revealed significantly in-
creased plaque burden in the mice fed HFCD
compared with the mice fed NCD. Mean (SD)
plaque areas in the mice exposed to PM2.6 and
fed HFCD vs. mice exposed to FA and fed HFCD
were 33 (10) vs. 27 (13) units, respectively.
PM2.5 and Vascular Inflammation: A 2.6-fold
higher inducible NOS content was apparent in
the mice exposed to PM2.6 and fed HFCD com-
pared with the mice exposed to FA and fed
HFCD chow and a 4-fold increase in the mice
exposed to PM2.6 and fed NCD compared with
the mice exposed to FA and fed NCD.
July 2009
D-21
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Sun
(2008,157033)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: ApoE1
Age: 6wks
et al. CAPs PM2.6
Collected from Sterling Forest State
Park, Tuxedo NY (40 miles NW of
Manhattan)
Particle Size: PM2.6
Route: Inhalation Chamber
Dose/Concentration: Average Concentration
of: 85 /yglm3 CAPs in chamber.
Average exposure over 6m - 15.2/yg/m3.
Time to Analysis: 6hfd, 5dfwk for 6m.
Mice received two different diets, high-fat
chow and normal-chow.
Macrophage and Tissue Factor Expression
in Aortic Segments: Tissue Factor (TF)
expression was noted predominantly in the
extracellular matrix surrounding macrophages,
foam cell-rich areas and around smooth muscle
cells.
1. High-Fat Diet: Increased TF and increased
macrophage infiltration was observed in the
plaques of high-fat chow mice exposed to PM
compared to mice exposed to air and high fat
diet.
2. Normal Diet: PM-exposed mice saw an
increase in CD68 expression compared to air-
exposed. However TF expression was not
significantly different in PM exposed normal
diet mice compared to control normal diet mice.
Reference: Sun et al.
(2008,157033)
Species: Human
Cell Lines: Human
Bronchial Epithelial
Cells (BEAS-2B);
Vascular Smooth
Muscle Cells (hSMCs);
and
Monocytes (THP-1)
Ambient Particles collected from
Sterling Forest State Park, Tuxedo,
NY (24 hid for4wks)
Particle Size: Particle size ranges:
1. < 0.18/ym
2.1.8 ¦ 2.5 /jm or
3. 2.5 ¦ 10/ym
Route: In vitro
Dose/Concentration: 10-300//gj ml
Time to Analysis: Doses were tested for
durations up to 24 h.
Dose durations tested for up to 24-h did not
indicate detectable effects on cell viability.
Effect of PM on TF Expression and Activity
in hSMCs: In the PM size range of 1-3 //m,
significant increases in TF expression was
observed at doses of 100 and 300/jm fniL. In
the < 0.18 /jm size range, significant increase
in TF expression was observed at all doses. The
particles with sizes 0.18 - 1.0 /jm did not
induce significant change in TF expression.
Effect of PM on TF Expression and Activity
in Monocyte Cells: TF protein expression
increased with < 0.18/ym and the 1- 3/jm
range particles. Expression was increased in
the 0.18-1.0/ym particle range but it was
limited compared to the other PM size ranges.
In general TF expression was higher in
monocytes than in hSMCs cells, but not
significantly.
Effect on TF Expression and Activity in
Bronchial Epithelial Cells: 100 //gfmL of the
1-3/jm and < 0.18/ym particles significantly
increased TF expression.
TF mRNA Expression: TF mRNA was
increased rapidly within the first hour in
response to SRM-1694a PM. The lowest dose
of SRM PM in //cj'niL induced highest levels of
mRNA in hSMCs, no further increase was
observed at higher concentrations.
Reference: Sun et al. PM2.6, Ultra Fine Particle (UFP) or FA Route: Inhalation via Whole-body Exposure
(2008,157032)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Age: 500-650g
Particle Size: PM2.6; UFP: < 0.1 fjm Dose/Concentration: Mean PM2.6
concentration: 79.1 ±7.4/yg/m3. Normalized
PM2.6 over 10wk period: 14.1 //g|m3.
Time to Analysis: 6hfday, 5dfweek random
exposure to PM2.6, UFP, or FA for a total of
10 weeks. At the end of week 9 exposure,
rats were infused wI 0.75 mg/kg/d of All for
7 days. PM2.6, UFP, or FA, continued during
All infusion period.
All - angiotensin II
Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP): after All
infusion, MAP was significantly higher in PM2.6
-All vs. FA-AII group. Aortic Vasoconstriction to
PE was potentiated with exaggerated relaxa-
tion to the Rho-kinase (ROCK) inhibitor Y-
27632 and increase in R0CK-1 mRNA levels in
the PM2.E -All group. Superoxide production in
the aorta was increased in the PM2.6. All group
compared to FA-AII group, inhabitable by
apocynin and L-NAME with coordinate
upregulation of NAD(PR oxidase subunits
p22phox and p47phox and depletion of
tetrahydrobipterin.
Reference: Sun et al.
(2008,157032)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Age: 500-650g
Use: Primary Rat
Aortic Smooth Muscle
Cells (RASMCs),
passages 4 to 8 used
for the experiment.
PM2.6; Ultra Fine Particle (UFP) or
Filtered Air (FA)
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: UFP, PM2.6: 10 or 50
Particle Size: PM2b; UFP: <0.1 /jm /yglmL; All: 100 nmol/L
Time to Analysis: Exposed to UFP or PM2.6
and parameters measured at 0,1, 3, 6, and
15min.
All - angiotensin II
Exposure to UFPs and PM2.6 was associated
with an increase in ROCK activity, phosphory-
lation of myosin light chain, and MYPT1.
Pretreatment with N-Acetylcysteine and the
Rho kinase inhibitors (Fasudil and Y-27632)
prevented MLC and MYPT-1 phosphorylation by
UFPs suggesting a Superoxide-mediated
mechanism for PM2.6 and UFPs effects.
July 2009 D-22 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Sun ~ et
al. (2009,190487)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: C57BL/6, c-
finsm (transgenic,
yellow fluorescent
protein under
monocyte-specific
promoter)
Age: 8,10wks
Weight: NR
PM (concentrated- northeastern
regional background; Tuxedo Park,
NY)
Particle Size: Diameter: 2.5 /jm
Route: Whole-body Exposure. IT Instillation.
Dose/Concentration: Exposure chamber
(mean): 72.7 /yglm3, IT: 1.6mg/kg
Time to Analysis: C57BL/6 mice equilibrated
2wks, fed high-fat chow 10wks. Exposed in
vivo 6h/d, 5d, 128d. fins'" rendered diabetic
or fed normal chow 10wks. IT instilled with
PM 5min, 2X/wk, 10wks.
Metabolic Impairment: PM induced insulin,
homeostasis model assessment indexes,
elevated glucose, and abnormalities in lipid
profile consistent with the IR phenotype.
Vascular Endothelium: PM decreased peak
relaxation and EDboto ACH and peak relaxation
to insulin. Lower levels of NO release were
seen.
Insulin Signaling: PM reduced the
phosphorylation of Akt in intact aorta. PKC-
P11 was the only PKC isoform to increase.
Adipose Inflammation, Visceral Adiposity:
PM significantly increased TNF-a, IL-6, E-
selectin, ICAM-1, plasminogen activator
inhibitor-1, and restin. PM increased visceral
and mesenteric fat mass. F4/80+macrophages
in fat tissue and adipocyte size increased. PM
downregulated IL-10 and glactose-N-
acetylgalactosamine-specific lectin.
YFP Cell Adhesion and Infiltration: PM
increased YFP cells in the adipose tissue, YFP
cell infiltration in the mesenteric fat, and YFP
cell adhesion to endothelium.
Reference:
Tamagawa et al.
(2008,191988)
Species: Rabbit
Gender: Female
Strain: New Zealand
White
Age: 12wks
Weight: Acute
(average)- 2.4±0.2kg,
Chronic (average)-
2.7 ±0.3kg
PM in (urban; Ottawa, Canada)
Particle Size: Mean diameter:
0.8±0.4/ym
Route: Intrapharyngeal Instillation
Dose/Concentration: Acute- 2.6mg/kg,
Chronic- 2mg/kg
Time to Analysis: Acute animals exposed
days 1, 3, 5. Chronic animals exposed 2x
4wks. Killed postexposure.
Inflammation: PMio induced more
macrophages, AMs, positive and activated
AMs, and fewer tissue macrophages. NO, WBC
and PMN were only significantly higher in the
first two weeks and IL-6 in the first week.
Vascular endothelial function: PMio
significantly reduced Ach-stimulated relaxation
and did not alter SNP-stimulated relaxation. A
significant inverse relationship between IL-6
and Ach-induced relaxation occurred at week 1
in the acute model and weeks 1 and 2 in the
chronic model.
AMs: The chronic model had a significant
correlation between IL-6 and both positive and
activated AMs at week 1. A significant inverse
relationship occurred between Ach and both
the volume fraction of positive and activated
AMs.
Reference:
Tankersley et al.
(2008,157043)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: C57BL/6,
C3H/HeJ, B6C3F1
Age: 18, 28m
Weight: NR
Carbon black (CB) (Wright dust feed
particle generator - BGI, Waltham,
MA)
Particle Size: 0.1-1.0/ym
Route: Inhalation Chamber
Dose/Concentration: Average PM2.6
concentration- 401 ±46/yglm3, Average PMio
concentration- 553±49/yg/m3
Time to Analysis: Exposed 3hfd 4d.
Hemodynamics: CB significantly elevated
right atrial and ventricular pressures,
pulmonary arterial pressure and vascular
resistance, all of which were more pronounced
in the 28m-old mice. RV contractility
(specifically, the ejection fraction and maximum
change in pressure over time) reduced in CB-
exposed 28m-old mice.
Heart tissue: CB significantly declined Ca2+-
dependent N0S activity and was more
pronounced in 28m-old mice, who also had
N0S2 upregulated. CB enhanced ROS
generation and NOS-uncoupling and was
greatest in 28m-old mice. CB also increased
MMP2, MMP9, ANP, BNP, which were
greatest in 28m-old mice. CB also reduced
PKG-1 in 28m-old mice.
July 2009 D-23 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Tankersley et al.
(2007,097910)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain:C3HfHeJ and
C57BL/6J
Age: 10wks
Weight: 22-26g
Carbon Black (CB) and Filtered Air
(FA)
Particle Size: CB: 2.4/ym (MMAD)
(GSD 2.75 //m).
Route: CB: Whole-body Inhalation Chamber;
Sympathetic (S) & Parasympathetic (PS)
blockade: IP Injection
Dose/Concentration: CB: 159 ± 12//gfm:l;
PS (atropine): 0.5mgfkg; S(propanolol):
1 mg/kg
Time to Analysis:Successive 3h CB and FA
Exposures: conducted from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m.,
or at least 3h after dark-to-light transition
(exposure period selected based on the nadir
in circadian pattern in HR responses).
Subgroups of both strains exposed to PS & S
blockade.
FA Exposure with Saline: A significantly
greater 3 h average response occurred in C3
compared with B6 mice.
PS Blockade: No evident strain difference
between C3 and B6 was observed.
S Blockade: 3 h average HR responses for C3
mice were significantly reduced compared with
saline.
CB Exposure: HR responses were significantly
elevated in C3 compared with B6 mice, but
these HR responses were not different relative
to FA exposure.
S Blockade: HR was significantly elevated in
B6 mice during CB relative to FA, but was not
changed in C3 mice.
Reference:
Tankersley CG et al.
(2004, 094378)
Species: Mice
Strain:AKRfJ
Age: — 180d
Use: Age matched
animals
Carbon Black (CB) and Filtered Air
(FA)
Particle Size: CB: 0.1 to 1um.
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: CB average
concentration: 160 ± 22/yg/m3
Time to Analysis: FA exposure on day 1, CB
exposure 3hfd for 3 consecutive days (days 2-
4)
On day 1, HR was significantly depressed
during FA in terminally senescent mice. By day
4, HR had significantly slowed due to the
effects of 3 days CB exposure. The combined
effects of terminal senescence and CB
exposure acted to depress HR to an average (±
SEM) 445 ± 40 bpm, ~ 80 bpm lower com-
pared to healthy HR responses. The change in
rMSSD was significantly greater on day 1 and
day 4 in terminally senescent mice, compared
to healthy mice. LF/HF ratio was significantly
depressed in terminally senescent mice on day
1. By day 4, significant increases in LF/HF were
evident in healthy mice during CB exposure.
Terminally senescent mice modulated a lower
HR without change in the LH/HF ratio during
CB exposure.
Reference: Thomson
et al. (2005, 087554)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Fischer-344
Weight: 200-250g
Urban Ambient Particles (EHC-93)
from Ottawa, Canada; Ozone
Particle Size: Respirable Modes
(aerodynamic diameter): 1.3 and 3.6
fjm. Non-respirable Mode
(aerodynamic diameter): 15/ym
Route: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: EHC-93: 0, 5, 50
mg/m3;
Ozone: 0, 0.4, 0.8ppm
Time to Analysis: 4h to particles, ozone, or
combination of particles and ozone.
Both pollutants individually increased preproET-
1, ET -1 and endothelia N0S mRNA levels in the
lungs shortly after exposure, consistent wI the
concomitant increase in plasma of ET-1 [1 -21 ].
Prepro ET 1 mRNA remained elevated 24 h
post-exposure to particles but no after ozone.
Both pollutants transiently increased ET-B
receptor mRNA expression, while ozone
decreased ET A receptor mRNA levels.
Coexposure to particles plus ozone increased
lung preproET-1 mRNA but not plasma ET-1 [1 -
21], suggesting alternative processing or
degradations of endothelins. This coincided wf
an increase of MMP-2 in the lungs (this enzyme
cleaves bigET-1 to ET-1[1-32]).
Reference: Thomson
E et al. (2006,
097483)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Fischer-344
Weight: 200-250g
Urban Ambient Particles (EHC-93)
from Ottawa, Canada; Ozone
Particle Size: NR
Route: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: EHC-93: 0, 50 mgfm3;
Ozone: 0, 0.8ppm
Time to Analysis: 4h to particles, ozone, or
combination of particles and ozone. Sacrificed
immediately following exposure or following
24h recovery.
Circulating levels of both ET -1 [1 -21 ] and ET-
3[1 -21 ] were increased immediately after
exposure to PM and ozone. While expression of
preproET-1 mRNA in the lungs increased,
expression of preproET-3 mRNA decreased
immediately after exposure. PreproET-2 mRNA
was not detected in the lungs, and exposure to
either pollutant did not affect plasma ET-2
levels. Coexposure to ozone and particles, while
altering lung preproET-1 and preproET-3 mRNA
levels in a fashion similar to ozone alone, did
not cause changes in the circulating levels of
the two corresponding peptides.
July 2009
D-24
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Totlandsdal et al.
(2008,157056)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: WKYINCrl and
Crl: Wl (Han)
Age: Adult
Weight: 220-300 g,
WKYINCrl; 250-300 g,
Crl: Wl (Han)
Use: Isolation of
Primary Rat Epithelial
Lung Cells (PRELCs):
from WKYINCrl rats.
Isolation of Rat
Ventricular
Cardiomyocytes and
Cardiofibroblasts
(RVCMs and RVCFBs)
from Crl: Wl (Han)
rats.
Pigment Black Printex 90 (Frankfurt,
Germany): PM: SRM 1648
Particle Size: Printex 90:12-17nm;
PM: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: Printex 90: 0, 50,100,
200 or 400 /yglmL; PM: 0, 200 /yglmL
Time to Analysis: 20h
Lung cell cultures: Both particles induced
release of IL-6 and IL-1 p, whereas TNF a was
only detected upon exposure to PM.
Cardiac Cell Cultures: IL-6 release was
strongly enhanced upon exposure to
conditioned media, and markedly exceeded the
response to direct particle exposure. IL-1, but
not TNF-a, seemed necessary, but not
sufficient, for this enhanced IL-6 release. The
role of IL-1 was demonstrated by use the use
of an IL-1 receptor antagonist that partially
reduced the effect of the conditioned media,
and by a stimulating effect on the cardiac cell
release of IL-6 by exogenous addition of IL-1 a
and IL-1 p.
Reference: Tzeng H P
et al. (2007, 097883)
Species: Rat
Strain: Wistar
Cell Type: Primary
Vascular Smooth
Muscle Cell Culture
(VSMCs): isolated
from thoracic aortas
from 200-250g rats.
which was attenuate by antioxidants (NAC,
PDTC). The level of translocation of NF-
kappaB-p65 in the nuclei of VSMCs was also
increased during MEPE exposure. The
potentiating effect of MEPE in serum-induced
VSMC proliferation was abolished by COX-2
selective inhibitor NS-398, specific ERK
inhibitor PD98059, and antioxidants (NAC,
PTDC).
Motorcycle Exhaust Particulate
Extract (MEPE) collected from a
Yamaha motorcycle with a 50 cm3
two-stroke engine using 95% octane
unleaded gasoline.
Particle Size: PM1, PM2.6, PM10
Route: In vitro
Dose/Concentration: 10-100 //g/mL
Time to Analysis: 3d
Exposure of VSMCs to MEPE (10-100/yglmL),
enhanced serum-induced VSMC proliferation.
The expression of proliferating cell antinuclear
antigen was also enhanced in the presence of
MEPE. VSCMs treated with MEPE induced
increase COX-2 mRNA, protein expression, and
PGE2 production, whereas the level of C0X-1
protein was unchanged. MEPE increased the
production of R0S in VSMCs, in a dose-
dependent manner. MEPE triggered time-
dependent ERK1/2 phosphorylation in VSMCs
Reference: Tzeng H P Motorcycle Exhaust Particulate
et al. (2003, 097247)
Species: Rat
Strain: Wistar
Cell Type: Primary
Vascular Smooth
Muscle Cell Culture
(VSMCs)
Extract (MEPE) collected from a
Yamaha motorcycle with a 50 cm3
two-stroke engine using 95% octane
unleaded gasoline.
Particle Size: NR
Route: In vitro
Dose/Concentration: MEPE: 10 //g/mL;
Nifedipine: 10 //mol; Manganese Acetate:
100/ymol; Staurosporine: 1-2 nM; Chel-
erythrine: 1 /jm
Time to Analysis: 18h
MEPE induced a concentration-dependent
enhancement of vasoconstriction elicited by
phenylephrine in the organ cultures of intact
and endothelium-denuded aortas for 18h.
Nifedipine, manganese acetate, and
staurosporine, but not chelerythrine, inhibited
the enhancement of vasoconstriction by MEPE.
ML-9 inhibited the enhancement of
vasoconstriction by MEPE. MEPE enhanced the
phosphorylation of 20k-Da in rat vascular
smooth muscle cells. N-acetylcysteine
significantly inhibited the enhancement of vaso-
constriction by MEPE. A time-dependent
increase in R0S production by MEPE was also
detected in primary cultures of VSMCs.
July 2009
D-25
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Upadhay Ultrafine Carbon Particles (UFCP)
S et al. (2008,
159345)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SHR
Age: 6m
Weight: NR
Particle Size: Size- 31 ±0.3nm,
MMAD- 46nm, Surface area
concentration- 0.139
m2(particle)/m3(air), Mass specific
surface area- 807m2/g
Route: Whole-body Exposure
Dose/Concentration: 172//gfm:l
Time to Analysis: Acclimatized 2d. 1 d
baseline. 24h exposure. 4d recovery.
Sacrificed 1st or 3,d day of recovery.
Cardiophysiology: The mean arterial BP and
HR increased but returned to baseline levels by
the 4th recovery day. SDNN and HRV
decreased. RMSSD and LF/HF decreased but
were not significant.
Pulmonary Inflammation: UFCP did not
cause pulmonary inflammation.
Pulmonary and Cardiac Tissue: HO-1, ET-1,
ETA, ETB, TF, PAI-1 significantly increased in
the lung on the 3,d recovery day. HO-1 was
repressed in the heart, but the other markers
had slight, nonsignificant increases.
Systemic Responses: Neutrophil and
lymphocyte cell differentials significantly
increased on the 1st recovery day. Other blood
parameters were unaffected. The plasma renin
concentration increased on the first 2 recovery
days. Ang I and II concentrations increased on
the 1st recovery day but was not significant.
Reference:
Wallenborn et al.
(2008,191171)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar Kyoto
(WKY)
Age: 13wks
Weight: NR
Zinc Sulfate (ZnS04, aerosolized)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 9.0±2.1 fjg zinc/m3,
35 ±8.1 /yg zinc/m3,123.2 ±29.6 /yg zinc/m3
Time to Analysis: Exposed 5h/d, 3d/wk,
16wks. Half of the rats used for
plasma/serum analysis, other half for isolation
of cardiac mitochondria.
A trend toward increased BALF protein was
seen. Cardiac mitochondrial ferritin had a small,
significant increase. Mitochondrial succinate
dehydrogenase and glutathione peroxidase had
small, significant decreases. Subchronic
exposure to 100 /yg/m3 caused expression
changes of cardiac genes involved with cell
signaling events, ion channels regulation, and
coagulation. No pulmonary-related effects were
seen.
Reference: Wellenius
GA et al. (2003,
055691)
Species: Dog
Gender: Female
Strain: Mixed mongrel
Age: NR
Weight: 14-17kg
CAPs
Particle Size: 0.26±0.04/ym
Route: Permanent Tracheostomy
Dose/Concentration: Median: 285.7 /yg/m3,
Range: 161.3-957.3/yg/m3
Time to Analysis: Thoracotomy and
tracheostomy performed. 5-13wks recovery.
Pairs of subjects: exposed 6h/d either 2nd or
3>d exposure time and filtered air other days.
5min preconditioning occlusion. 20min rest
interval. 5min experimental occlusion. Some
dogs exposed 6h/d, 4d (consecutive), filtered
air on day 4.
CAPs increased the ST-segment elevation and
remained elevated 24h after exposure. This
increase was seen in precordial leads V4and Ve.
Multivariate regression analyses showed that
the mass concentration of Si was significantly
associated with the peak ST-segment elevation
and integrated ST-segment change. Univariate
regression analyses showed Pb to also be
significantly associated with these measures.
CAPs had no effect on peak heart rate during
occlusion or the maximum occlusion-induced
increase in heart rate.
Reference: Wellenius
GA et al. (2004,
087874)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Age: Adult
Weight: —250 g
Use: Rat Model for
Acute Myocardial
Infarction (AMI): Left-
ventricular Ml induced
by thermocoagulation.
Animals allowed to
recover for at least
12h after surgery.
CAPs:
CO
Particle Size: CAPs: PM2.6
Route: Whole-body Inhalation Chambers
Dose/Concentration: CO: 35ppm; CAPs
(median concentration): 350.5/yg.m3;
CAPs+CO: (CAPs median concentration):
318.2 /yg/m3
Time to Analysis: 1 h exposure to CAPs or
CAPs+CO for 1h. Exposure to pollutants was
preceded and followed by 1h exposure to FA.
Exposure experiments were performed during
the period of 07/2000 and 01/2003
CO exposure reduced the ventricular premature
beat (VPB) frequency by 60.4% during the
exposure time compared to controls. This
effect was modified by both infarct type and
the number of pre exposure VPBs, and was
mediated through changes in hear rate (HR).
Overall, CAPs exposure increased VPB
frequency during the exposure period, but this
did not reach statistical significance. This ef-
fect was modified by the number of pre-
exposure VPBs. In rats with a high number of
pre exposure VPB, CAPS exposure significantly
decreased VPB frequency (67.1%). Overall,
neither CAPs nor CO had any effect on HR, but
CAPs increased HR in specific subgroups. No
significant interactions were observed between
the effects of CO and CAPs.
July 2009
D-26
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Wellenius
et al. (2006,156152)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Age: Adult
Weight: — 250g
Use: Rat Model for
Acute Myocardial
Infarction (AMI): Left-
ventricular Ml induced
by thermocoagulation.
Animals allowed to
recover for at least
12h after surgery.
CAPs: (Boston, MA)
Particle Size: CAPs: PM2.6
Route: Whole-body Inhalation Chambers
Dose/Concentration: CO: 35ppm; CAPs
(median concentration): 645.7//g.m3;
CAPs+CO: 37.9ppm
Time to Analysis: CAPs or CAPs+CO
exposure for 1h. Exposure to pollutants was
preceded and followed by 1h exposure to FA.
Among rats in the CAPs group, the probability
of observing supraventricular arrhythmias
(SVA) decreased from the baseline to exposure
and post-exposure periods. The pattern was
significantly different than that observed for
the FA group during the exposure period. In the
subset with one or more SVA during the
baseline period, the change in SVA rate from
baseline to exposure period was significantly
lower in the CAPs and CO groups only, when
compared to the FA group. No significant
effects were observed in the group si-
multaneously exposed to CAPs and CO.
Reference: Wichers
et al. (2004, 055636)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SH
Aqe: 75d
HP-12 (oil-combustion derived PM
obtained from inside wall of a Boston
power plant stack burning residual oil
(number 6).
Water-leachable constituents
(//gfmg): SO4 (217.3); Zn (11.4); Ni
(6.9); Fe (0.0); V (1.3); Cu (0.2); Pb
(0.0)
1M HCI-leachable constituents
Wmg): SO4 (220.6); Zn (15.5); Ni
(14.8); Fe (15.6); V (32.9); Cu (1.1);
Pb (1.7)
Particle Size: 3.76/ym (MMAD)
(GSD2.16)
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: HP-12 (mg/kg): 0.00
(saline control), 0.83 (low), 3.33 (mid), 8.33
(high)
Time to Analysis: Single-dose Sacrificed 96h
or 192h post-IT.
Exposures to mid and high-dose HP-12 induced
large decreases in HR, BP, and body
temperature. The decreases in HR and BP were
most pronounced at night and did not return to
pre-IT values until 72h (HR) and 48h (BP) after
dosing. ECG abnormalities (rhythm
disturbances, bundle branch block) were
observed primarily in the high dose group.
Reference: Wold et UFPs from either ambient air (UFAAs) Route: IV Infusion (in vivo study)
al. (2006, 097028)
Species: Rat
Gender: Female
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Use: L jugular vein
and R carotid artery
were canulated.
or diesel engine exhaust (UFDGs);
UFIDs from industrial forklift exhaust
and soluble fraction UFID suspension,
particle free (SF-UFID)
Particle Size: UFAAs diameter ~
150 nm; UFDGs diameter ~ 10Onm
Dose/Concentration: UFDG (50//gjm|
Time to Analysis: Infused wfUFAA or UFDG.
Monitored continuously for 1 h then sacrificed.
Infusion of UFDGs caused ventricular prema-
ture beats (VPBs) in 2 out of 3 rats. Ejection
fraction increased slightly in rats receiving
UFAA and was unchanged in the UFDG and
saline groups.
Reference: Wold LE
et al. (2006, 097028)
Species: Rat
Gender: Female
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Use: Heart
Langendorff-perfusion
apparatus
UFPs from either ambient air (UFAAs)
or diesel engine exhaust (UFDGs);
UFIDs from industrial forklift exhaust
and soluble fraction UFID suspension,
particle free (SF-UFID)
Particle Size (Distribution): UFAAs
diameter; n150 nm; UFDGs diameter:
~100nm
Route: Lagendorff Heart Perfusion (in vitro)
Dose/Concentration: UFDG (100 /yg /2ml);
UFID (12.5 /yg/l in perfusate); SF-UFID (12.5
Afg/D
Time to Analysis: Lagendorff 1: Treated
w/UFDG. Lagendorff 2: Treated with UFID &
SFUFID. Both experiments were monitored
continuously for 1h after injection.
UFDGs caused a marked increase in left-
ventricular and end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP)
after 30 min of exposure. UFIDs caused a
significant decrease in left-ventricular systolic
pressure (LVSP) at 30min after the start of
infusion. This effect was absent when SF UFID
was studied.
Reference: Yatera et EHC-93 from Ottawa, Canada
al. (2008,157162) partic|e size: NR
Species: Rabbit
Gender: Female
Strain: WHHL
Age: 42wks
Weight: 3.2 ± 0.1 kg
(avg)
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: PMm suspension: 5mg
EHC-93 in 1 ml saline
Time to Analysis: Exposed 2xfwk for 4 wks.
Acute effects observed at 0.5,1, 2, 4, 8,12,
and 24h after initial instillation. Chronic
effects observed 1x/wk for 4 wks.
Exposure to PM10 caused progression of
atherosclerotic lesions in thoracic and
abdominal aorta. It also decreased circulating
monocytes expressing high levels of CD31 and
CD49d, and increased expression of CD54
(ICAM-1) and CD106 (VCAM-1) in plaques.
Exposure to PM10 increased the number of
BrdU-labeled (*) monocytes into plaques and
into smooth muscle underneath plaques.
("onocytes labeled with BrdU in donor rabbits
were transfused to recipient rabbits as whole
blood, and the recruitment of BrdU-labeled cells
into vessel walls and plaques in recipients was
measured by quantitative histological
methodology.
July 2009
D-27
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Ying Z et
al. (2001,019011)
Species: Mice
Gender: Male
Strain: ApoE'1'
Age: 16wks
CAPs: PM2.6, New York City
(Manhattan), NY; May-Sept 2007
Particle Size: NR
Route: Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 138.4 ± 83.7 //gfm3
Time to Analysis: 6h/d x 5dfwk * 4m
Vascular tone: Significant decrease in PE-
induced maximum contraction of aortic rings in
CAPsexposed mice. No difference in sensitivity
to PE between groups. Treatment with the
soluble guanylate cyclase inhibitor 0DQ
restored the response to PE in CAPs aortic
rings. No significant differences in relaxation
induced by ACh. CAPs abolished the relaxation
induced by Ca ionophore A23187. CAPs
exposure slightly (but significantly) decreased
maximum relaxation induced by SNP.
Protein expression: iNOS mRNA expression
was increased in the aortas of CAPs exposed
mice. eNOS and GTPCH levels were unchanged.
Distribution of inOS protein expression was
limited to plaque in air-exposed mice and was
found in the plaque and media for CAPs-
exposed mice.
Superoxide production: Superoxide levels in
CAPs exposed mice were increased in the aorta
compared to air-exposed mice. The addition of
L-NAME significantly increased superoxide
production. Extensive protein nitration in aortas
of CAPs mice. NADPH subunits Rac1 and p47
phox mRNA expression was increased in aortas
of mice exposed to CAPs.
Atherosclerosis: Significant increase in
area of CAPs exposed mice. Higher levels of
macrophage infiltration, collagen deposition,
and lipid composition of plaques from CAPs-
expsoed mice.
Reference: Ying Z et
al. (2001,019011)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: ApoE1
Age: 6wks
Weight: NR
CAPs (New York, NY) (May-Sept.
2007)
Particle Size: Diameter: < 2.5 /jm
Route: Exposure Chamber
Dose/Concentration: Ambient PM2.6:
23±75.9/yg/m3, Chamber PM2.6: 138.4±
83.7 /yglm3
Time to Analysis: Fed high-fat chow 10wks.
Exposed 6h/d, 4m.
Vascular: Constriction responses to KCI were
similar between CAPs exposed and control
mice. PE-induced maximum contraction
significantly decreased in CAPs mice, which
was attenuated by the soluble guanine cyclase
inhibitor 0QD. CAPs prevented calcium
ionophore A23187-induced relaxation. CAPs
decreased SNP-induced maximal relaxation.
iNOS, Aortic O2 : iNOS mRNA expression
increased. Aortic O2 increased and was further
increased by N0S inhibitor L-NAME.
Atherosclerosis: The only NADPH oxidase
subunits affected were Rac1 and p47pl"™,
which increased. Atherosclerotic burden in the
thoracic aorta, macrophage infiltration,
collagen deposition, and lipid composition in the
aorta all increased.
Reference: Yokota S
et al. (2004, 096516)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley (IGS)
Weight: 345-498.2g
DEP (obtained from the Japan
Automobile Research Institute)
Particle Size: NR
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: Group 1: DEP:
1 mg/0.1 ml
Group 2: DEP: 0.2 ml (10, 12.5 or 25 mg/ml)
Group 3: DEP 2.5 or 5mg/0.2ml
Time to Analysis: DEP pre-treatment 24-72h
before ischemia/reperfusion.
DEP effects on myocardial
Ischemia/Reperfusion-induced arrhythmia:
An increased mortality was observed in the
DEP group compared to the vehicle-treated
group. 46% of the animals in DEP died during
the first 3 min reperfusion period. The animals
of other groups were intratracheal^ instilled
with DEP at the beginning of ische-
mia/reperfusion experiment, or were pretreated
with polyethylene glycol-conjugated SOD (1000
lU/kg, iv). In these animals, incidences of both
arrhythmia and mortality were similar to those
in the animals treated with the vehicle.
DEP effects on the biochemical and
hematological parameters: Neutrophil count
was elevated by a higher dose (5 mg) of DEP at
24 h after the IT instillation, and oxygen radical
production, which was induced by 12-0-
tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate, was
enhanced at 72h.
July 2009 D-28 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Yokota S
et al. (2005, 096003)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley (IGS)
Weight: 303-472.2g
Use: Rats were used
after a 7-day
acclimation period
DEP from Japan
Particle Size: NF
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: Vehicle: 0.2 mLfanimal
DEP: 5 mg/animal
Time to Analysis: Single exposure 0.5,1, 2,
3, 6,12, 24, 48h.
At 12 and 24 h post-instillation, circulatory
neutrophil counts in the 5 mg DEP group were
significantly elevated, and were 2.1 -fold (12h|
and 2.3 fold (24 h) in vehicle treated animals. 1
mg DEP caused an increase of approximately
0.4-fold in CNC at 6h. 12-0-
tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate induced
oxyradical production (0RP) in the isolated
neutrophil was enhanced at 12 and 24 h after
instillation with 5 mg DEP. In Serum, a marked
elevation of CINC-1 and a slight elevation of
MIP-2 were also observed, while TNF a was
not detected. GM-CSF was not detected in
serum 24 h post-instillation.
Reference: Yokota S
et al. (2008,190109)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: ddy
Age: NR
Weight: 39.6-46.Og
DEP (DMSC (dichloromethane
soluble-component), RPC (residual
particle-component))
Particle Size: NR
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 5mgfkg, 10mg/kg
Time to Analysis: DMSC and RPC extracted
from DEP. Mice acclimatized 7d. DEP, DMSC,
or RPC instilled. BALF and blood obtained and
G-CSF, GM-CSF, IL-6 measured 2, 4,12, 24h
post instillation.
Inflammation: At 5mgfkg DEP increased the
total cell and macrophage count. DEP or RPC
increased neutrophils at 5 and 10mg/kg.
10mg/kg DEP or RPC increased macrophages
at 4h and decreased at 12h.
Hematology: Compared to 5mg/kg DEP, RPC
increased RBC, WBC, and neutrophils. 10mg/kg
RPC or DEP caused sustained increases in RBC,
WBC, and neutrophils.
Cytokines: 5mgfkg RPC markedly increased G-
CSF and IL-6. Other cytokine increases at this
dose were transient. 10mg/kg DEP increased
IL-6 at 4h, and DEP or RPC increased G-CSF
and IL-6 at 12h. DEP or RPC also increased IL-
1p.
Myocardium: Myocardial MPO activity
significantly increased in 5mg/kg RPC at 12
and 24h. Myocardial MIP-2 increased the most
in 5mg/kg RPC, while LIX tended to be lowered
by RPC.
Table D-2. Respiratory effects: in vitro studies.
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Aam BB
and Fonnum F, (2007,
155123)
Species: Human, Rat
Tissues/Cell Types:
Human-Neutrophil
Granulocytes (NG);
Rat- Alveolar
Macrophages (AM)
DEP: SRM 1975
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: NG:
280 /yglmL
AM: 140, 280/yg/mL
Vitamin E - 5//M
Time to Analysis: 1h
ROS of NG: Formation of ROS in NG decreased
with increased doses of DEP. Lucigenin
chemiluminescence of ROS formation diminished
25% at 8.8/yglmL DEP and luminol
chemiluminescence 32% with 17.5/yglmL DEP.
DCF fluorescence required much higher doses of
DEP. Controls without PMA stimulation had highly
reduced lucigenin and luminol with DEP dose of
140/yglmL while DCF increased 116%.
ROS of AM: 280/yglmL of DEP decreased ROS
level by 19% with DCF. DEP with PMA-
unstimulated cells increased 24% with DCF.
Necrosis: NG cell death was DEP dose-dependent.
At 280 /yglmL, cell death increased 5.4% as
compared to control. LDH concentration increased
1.6% with 70/yglmL DEP and 3.9% with 280
/yg/mL after 1h.
July 2009
D-29
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Agopyan
et al. (2003, 056065)
Species: Human
Tissues/Cell Types:
BEAS-2B, NHBE,
SAEC
PC: synthetic carboxylate-modified particles
Particle Size: 2,10//m
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration:
PC2 - 0.83 glmL or 3.4x109 par-
ticles/mL
PC10 - 0.8 g/mL or 3x10e parti-
cles/mL
Time to Analysis:
PC2 - 12, 24, 8h
PC10 - 2, 6,12, 24h
Calcium Imaging: PC10 induced increase of
Ca2+ concentration in all capsaicin-sensitive cells
100%. Similar reaction observed in cells exposed
to PC2. However, more than 3-PC2s were required
to induce a Ca increase unlike PC10. CPZ (1 Oum)
and amiloride could fully block PC-induced
response.
cAMP: Post 6h, a dose-dependent increase in
cAMP was observed. Again, CPZ blocked increase
by 70-90% depending on cell type: SAEC > NHBE
~ BEAS-2B.
Apoptosis: PC10 and PC2 induced apoptosis
time-dependently. PC2 was slower in induction
than PC10. Post 48h, 80-95% cells were
apoptotic in all cell types. Noncapaisin-sensitive
cells (which did not bind to particles) did not
exhibit apoptosis. CPZ reduced apoptosis by 97%
BEAS-2B, 96% NHBE and 98% SAEC. Amiloride
did not block apoptosis.
Necrosis: Induction of necrosis by PC2 and PC 10
was negligible. A slight increase from 1 % to 2%
was observed at 24-48h in NHBE and SAEC.
BEAS-2B showed slight decrease from 3% to 4%
in same time i
Reference: Agopyan R0FA
et al. (2004,156198) MSHA: Mt St He|en Ash
Species: Human, Particle Size: NR
Mouse
Tissues/Cell Types:
Human-NHBE, SAEC;
Mouse-Wildtype and
TRPV1 (-/-) Terminal
Ganglion Neurons
(TG)
-257 Wildtype
Neurons
-187 TRPV (¦/¦)
Neurons
Apoptosis: R0FA or MSHA induced time-
dependent apoptosis, peaking at 24 h. CPZ again
inhibited this response. Neurons bound to PM
(< 25um) induced apoptosis in TRPV1 (+/+). Cells
without bound PM or bound with PM (> 25 //m)
showed no effect. No apoptosis occurred in the
absence of Ca2+.
Necrosis: Necrosis for any of the cell types was
negligible.
PKA: Inhibition of PKA resulted in 90+%
apoptosis in NHBE and SAEC. Again, no apoptosis
was observed in a Ca2+ free environment.
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 100 //glmL
R0FA or MSHA
Time to Analysis: ROFAfMSHA
in NHBE and SAEC - 2,6,24,
48 h
ROFAfMSHA in TG - 24 h
cAMP measurements with NHBE
and SAEC exposed to
R0FA/MSHA - 6h
Calcium Imaging in NHBE and SAEC: In 100%
of reactive cells, ROFAfMSHA induced an increase
in Ca2+. Levels remained elevated as long as PM
bound to plasma membrane. Washing and
disjoining PM from membrane caused Ca2+ to
slowly decline to baseline. CPZ (or CPZ and
amiloride) reversibly inhibited PM-induced rises in
Ca2+.
Calcium Imaging in TRPV1 (+ /+) and (-/-) mice
sensory neurons: All sensitive neurons in
TRPV1 (+/ +) increased Ca2+ in response to
R0FA. No effect of R0FA in TRPV1 (¦!¦).
cAMP: R0FA and MSHA induced increases in
Ca2+ in NHBE and SAEC cells, which was
completely blocked by cAMP.
Reference: Ahn E-K
et al. (2008,156199)
Species: Human
Tissues/Cell Types:
A549
DEP: (6 cyl, 11L, turbo-charged, heavy-duty
diesel engine, South Korea)
Dex: anti-inflammatory (Sigma, St. Louis, M0)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentrations: 0,1, 5,
10, 50 and 100 //g/mL of DEP
Some cells pre-treated with 10,
20, 40, 50 pg/mL of Dex.
Time to Analysis: 24h
COX-2 Expression: Cells expressed dose-
dependent increases in C0X-2 expression after
treatment with 10-100 //glmL of DEP. Treatment
of 50 //glmL for 24 h induced statistically
significant C0X-2 expression in both mRNA and
protein levels. Pre-treatment with Dex
significantly reduced expression of C0X-2 mRNA
and protein. Dex treatment induced dose-
dependent suppression of DEP-induced protein
levels.
PGE2 Levels: Levels of the inflammatory
mediator, PGE2, increased when were cells
exposed to 50//glmL of DEP. Pre-treatment with
50/yg fniL Dex completely inhibited DEP-induced
release of PGE2.
July 2009
D-30
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Ahsan
(2005,156200)
Species: Human
Tissues/Cell Types:
T rx-1 -transfected
Clone of Murine L-
929 cells; Control
Clone (L-929-l\leo1);
A549
DEP: provided by Dr. Masaru Sagai, University Route: Cell Culture
of Health and Welfare, Aomori, Japan Dose/Concentration:
Particle Size: NR
DEP: 50 //g/mL
hTrx-1 ¦ or L-929-Neo1: 40 /yglmL
Pretreatment: rhTrx-1 (10/yg/mL)
or DM-rhT rx-1 (NR)
Time to Analysis: Pretreatment
for 1 h. Parameters measured 3h
post exposure.
ROS: DEP induced significant increases of R0S in
L929-Neo1 cells. hTRx-1 cells showed no affect.
RT-PCR revealed hT rx-1 mRNA expression in
transfected cells but not control L929-Neo1 cells.
Endogenous murine Trx-1 mRNA expression
increased in control cells, but not in hT rx-1 cells.
A549 cells had increased ROS levels but these
levels were suppressed with rhTrx-1 pretreatment.
Pretreatment with DM-rhT rx-1 increased ROS
levels more.
Akt (antiapoptotic molecule): Phosphorylated
Akt prevents apoptosis. DEP induced
phosphorylation of Akt in control cells after 3h
and ^phosphorylation after 5h. In hT rx-1 cells,
Akt remained phosphorylated after 5h. In A549
cells, Akt phosphorylated at 3h and slowly turned
off at 12-24 h. Pre-treatment with rhTrx-1
blocked dephosphorylation. This suggests that
Trx-1 preserves active form of Akt and thereby
protects against cytotoxicity from DEP.
Reference: Alfaro-
Moreno et al. (2002,
156204)
Species: Human,
Mouse, Rat
Strain: Human-A549;
Mouse-J7 74A.1,
BALB-c
Tissues/Cell Types:
HUVEC, Mouse
Fibroblasts, Rat Lung
Fibroblasts (RLF)
PMni: Collected from 3 zones in Mexico City:
North (industrial), Center (business) and South
(residential)
Particle Size: PMio
Route: Cell Culture
15000 cells/cm2 except:
Cytotoxicity: Confluent Cultures
180,000 cells/cm2.
DNA Breakage: 20,000 cells/well.
Cytokine Assays: 180,000
cells/cm2
Dose/Concentration:
Cytotoxicity: 10, 20,40, 80,160
/yg/cm2
Apoptosis: 160/yg/cm2
DNA Breakage: 2.5, 5,10, 20, 40
/yg/cm2
Cytokine Assays: 10, 20, 40, 80
/yg/cm2
E-Selectin Expression: 40 /yglcm2
Time to Analysis: Cytotoxicity:
24, 48, 72h; Apoptosis: 24 h;
DNA Breakage: 72h; Cytokine
Assays: 24 h
Cytotoxicity: Cytotoxic effect exhibited dose-
dependency after 72h in proliferating cells of
J774A.1, BALB-c and RLF cell lines.
Proliferating Cells: Northern particles induced a
statistically larger effect than central or southern
particles. J774A.1 was more susceptible while
BALB-c was less susceptible. A549 was most
resistant to decreased viability during exposure.
No significant variation in viability was observed
when compared to the control. Particles were not
cytotoxic among confluent cell growth for any cell
lines when exposed to 20-160 /yglcm2.
Apoptosis: Overall, particles induced low rates of
cell death via apoptosis. J774A.1 depicted similar
levels of apoptosis when exposed to three PM
zones, ~ 15% apoptotic cells measured. BALB-c
was not reported. Results for the A549 measured
apoptotic cells were: South- 4%, Central- 11 % and
North- 15%. HUVEC cells indicated an increase in
apoptosis with northern particles.
DNA Breakage: PMio from all zones induced DNA
breakage. A dose-dependent relationship was
established with PM2.6 particles at concentrations
of 10 /yglcm2. The Southern zone required a higher
dose of PM (10/yg/cm2) to produce the same
effect as other zones (2.5/yg/cm2).
Cytokines: Particles induced TNF-a and IL-6
secretion in J774A.1 cells dose-dependently. IL-6
increased significantly with central particles.
PGE2 secretion in RLF cells induced by exposure
to PM showed dose-dependent responses. PM
from the central zone induced the most PGE2
secretion. Max secretion was observed at doses
of 40 /yglcm2 from all three PM zones.
E-Selectin Expression: HUVEC cells showed a
25% increase in E-selectin expression after
exposure to 40 /yglcm2 of PM.
July 2009 D-31 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Amakawa
et al. (2003,156211)
Species: Mouse,
Human
Strain: Mouse-ICR
Tissues/Cell Types:
AMs
Gender: Mouse-Male;
Human-Male
Age: Mouse 6-7wks;
Human 20-24yrs
DEP
(obtained from a 4JB1, Isuzu, 1500 rpm, 4cyl
diesel engine)
DEPE - DEP Extract (methanol)
CB - Charcoal (Sigma)
Particle Size: DEP- 0.4/ym, CB- 0.7/jm
Route: Cell Culture
Mouse: 5X106 cells/mL Human:
3X106 cells/mL
Dose/Concentration: DEP - 1 or
10/yg/mL:DEPE - 1 or 10//g/mL;
CB - 1,10,100//g/mL
Time to Analysis: Human cells
pre-treated with LPS 1 /yglmL.
Murine cells pre-treated with SOD
300 lll/mL. Parameters measured
24h post exposure.
Cells: For mice, more than 90% of the cells were
macrophages and over90% were viable. For
humans, 96% of the cells were macrophages, 3%
lymphocytes and 1 % neutrophils: over95% of the
human cells were viable.
DEP Cytotoxicity: None observed
Cytokines: DEP (10//gfmL) suppressed release of
TNF-a and IL-6 for both mice and humans in a
dose-dependent manner. Murine cells pre-treated
with LPS or IFN-y released even less TNF-a and
IL-6. IL-10 was unaffected. Human macrophages
pre-treated with LPS also released lower levels of
TNF-a, IL-6 and IL-8.
ROS: Pre-treatment of SOD on murine cells
partially attenuated the suppressive effect of DEP
as well as decreased the production of ROS
generated by DEP (10/yg/mL).
Carbon: Carbon particles did not suppress TNF-a
or IL-6 release from murine AMs; however,100
/yg/mL of CB stimulated TNF-a production.
Methanol: No cytotoxicity nor cytokine release
effects were observed.
DEPE: DEPE suppressed TNF-a and IL-6 release in
a similar way as DEP.
Reference: Amara et
al. (2007,156212)
Species: Human
Cell Lines: A549,
NCI-H292
DEP - SRM 2975
CSC - cigarette smoke condensates
(collected from Kentucky standard cigarettes,
2R4F; University of Kentucky)
DC - DEP + CSC
CB (Degussa, Frankfurt, Germany)
Particle Size: CB: 95nm; DEP: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: DEP -
10/yg/cm2
CB - 10/yg/cm2
CSC - 10/yg/cm2
Time to Analysis: 6 or 24h
Inflammatory Markers: LDH of A549 was
unaffected at either time point with DEP or CB.
LDH increased with CSC at concentrations high
than 10/yg|mL at both time points. DC had no
effect.
Proteases: MMP-1 mRNA expression showed a
dose dependent increase with DEP in A549 cells.
DEP also increased MMP-1 in NCI-H292 cells. CB
and CSC had no effect. MMP-1 mRNA expressions
were inhibited by N-acetylcysteine antioxidant.
Similar inhibition was observed with N0X4
oxidase. DC induced a similar effect to DEP. MMP-
1 protein expression increased post 24 h with
DEP. MMP-2, TIMP-1, TIMP-2 mRNA expression
was unaffected.
TGF: TGF (3 mRNA expression was unaffected.
ROS: DEP and DC increased ROS formation after
1h. DEP effect was inhibited by N-acetylcysteine
antioxidant pre-treatment.
MAP-Kinase: DEPinduced MMP-1 expression
increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation after 10 min,
peaking at 30min, and returning to normal levels
at 60min. Treatment with CBPs did not increase
ERK1/2 phosphorylation whereas treatment with
CSC resulted in phosphorylation. Only inhibitors of
ERK1/2 reduced DEP induced MMP-1 activity. P38
and JNK inhibitors had no effect.
Reference: Anseth et
al. (2005, 088646)
Species: Human
Cell Lines: A549;
A549-p0 (lacking
mitrochondria)
s-ROFA: soluble portion
Particle Size: 1.95 ± 0.18 /jm
Route: Cell Culture (3X10E
cells.i'niL)
Dose/Concentration: 100 //gfmL
Time to Analysis: Experiments
conducted by spreading monolayer
of Infasurf (calf lung surfactant
extract on PBS, PBS+R0FA or
conditioned media from A549
AEC. Parameters measured after
16h incubation period.
Lung Surfactant Gelation: R0FA alone and
A549 conditioned media alone did not significantly
alter Infasurf rheology. However, conditioned
media from A549 AEC at 16h induced a
significant increase in elastic storage and viscous
loss moduli. Inhibiting ROS production lowered
effect, indicating s-ROFA gelation mediated
through ROS.
ROS: ROS mediated through mitochondria as
evidenced by the effect of R0FA-AEC on
surfactant gelation in the presence of
mitochondria ROS inhibitors as well as A549-p0
cells.
July 2009 D-32 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Auger et
al. (2006,156235)
Species: Human
Tissue/Cell Type:
Nasal Epithelial Cells
DEP: SRM1650
PM2.6: (obtained from a highway in Paris,
France)
Particle Size: DEP: 400 nm (mean diameter);
PM2.6
Route: Cell Culture (2-3.5x104
cells/cm2)
Dose/Concentration: 10-80
/yg/cm2
Time to Analysis: Cells treated
on apical side. Parameters
measured 24h following
treatment.
Cytotoxicity (LDH): No cytotoxicity for DEP or
PM2.6 (80/yg/cm2).
Cytokines: In non-stimulated ALI cultures, IL-8
was the most abundantly secreted cytokine,
followed by GM-CSF, TNF-a, and IL-6 in
decreasing levels of production. Amphiregulin was
moderately, but consistently, secreted. After
treatment, both DEP and PM2.6 induced IL-8 and
amphiregulin release in a dose-dependent manner
through the basolateral surface. PM2.6 stimulated
IL-6 and GM-CSF release through the apical
surface.
ICAM-1 expression: No effect from DEP or
PM2.6.
ROS: DEP and PM2.6 both increased R0S
production in a dose-dependent manner.
Reference: Bachoual
et al. (2007,155667)
Species: Mouse
Cell Type: RAW
264.7
PM10 from two Paris, France subway sites:
RER and Metro
CB (Frankfurt, Germany)
Ti02 (Calais, France)
DEP: SRM1650 (NIST)
Particle Size: CB: 95nm; Ti02:150um; DEP:
NR;
RER PM10: 79% < 0.5 fjm, 20% 0.5-1 fim;
Metro PM10: 88% <0.5 fjm, 11 % 0.5-1 fjm.
Route: Cell Culture (40,000
cellsfmL)
Dose/Concentration: All
particles: 0.01, 0.1,1,10/yg/cm2
Time to Analysis: 3, 8, 24h
Cell Viability: No effects from any particulate at
concentrations up to 10 /yglcm2 for 24 h.
Inflammatory Effect: Exposure of cells to
10/yg/cm2 of RER or Metro induced time-
dependent increase in TNF-a and MIP-2 protein
release. This effect was similar to both locations.
No effect was observed at low concentrations of
PM10. No effect of CB, Ti02 or DEP was observed.
GM-CSF or KC production: RER and Metro PM10
did not induce any effect at any concentration.
Effect on Protease mRNA Expression: Exposure
of cells to 10/yglcm2 RER or Metro PM10 did not
modify mRNA expression of MMP-2 or -9 or their
inhibitors TIMP-1 and -2. MMP-12 expression
significantly increased after exposure to RER or
Metro PM10 for 8h.
Effects on HO-1 Protein Expression: Exposure
to 10 /yglcm2 of RER or Metro PM10 for 24 h
induced positive cytoplasmic staining for H0-1.
Reference: Batalha
et al. (2002, 088109)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SD
Age: NR
Weight: 200-250g
CAPs (Harvard Ambient Particle Concentrator)
Particle Size: Mean: 2.7 fjm
Route: Inhalation Chamber
Dose/Concentration: Range:
73.5-733 //g/m3
Time to Analysis: CAPs exposure
5h/d, 3d (consecutive). SO2
exposure to induce CB 5hfd,
5d/wk, 6wks. Killed 24h
postexposure.
Histopathology: CAPs slightly increased the wall
thickness of small pulmonary arteries and edema
in the adventitia and hyperplasia of the terminal
bronchiole and alveolar ducts epithelium.
L/W ratio: The L/W ratio decreased in CAPs-
exposed rats as particle mass, Si, Pb, SO42 , EC
and 0C increased. Univariate analyses showed
significant negative correlations between the L/W
ratio and Si and SO42 in normal rats and Si and 0C
in CB rats. Multivariate analysis showed only Si to
be significant in both groups.
July 2009 D-33 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Baulig et
al. (2007,151733)
Species: Human
Cell Line: 16-
HBE14o-
WUB: Winter Urban Background Particles
(obtained from Vitry-sur-Seine, suburb of
Paris, France)
SUB: summer Urban Background Particles
Vitry-sur-Seine)
WC: Winter Curbside Particles, SRM1648
(obtained from Porte-d'Auteuil, ring road of
Paris, France)
SC: summer Curbside Particles, SRM 1648
(Porte-d'Auteuil)
DEP: SRM 1650a (NIST)
DPL (control)
Particle Size: WUB, SUB: PM? b; WC, SC,
DEP: NR
Route: Cell Culture (20,000
cells/cm2)
Dose/Concentration: 10 //gjcnr
Time to Analysis: 18 or 24h
EGF: All native PM2.6 induced similar AR secretion
by bronchial epithelial cells (in decreasing order
WC, WUB, SC, SUB), but this release was
significantly greater than the release induced by
DEP. Pcellulin increased with SC, WUB and WC.
No data was available forSUB or DEP.
Interleukins: IL-1 a increased significantly with
WUB, WC,SC, DEP, DPL (in decreasing order). No
data was available for SUB. Exposure to WUB
caused IL-1 (3 to increase to induction factor of
over 2. IL-11 R a decreased significantly with
SUB.
Cytokines: Exposure to WUB caused G-CSF to
increase with an induction factor of over 2.Though
not statistically significant, TNF-R1 also
increased.
Proteases: TIMP-2 decreased with WUB but
significantly increased with SUB. Overall, SUB
downregulated integrins and interleukins seen
with other particles while upregulating
neurotrophic factors, chemokine receptors and
adhesion molecules. MMPs were not measured.
Chemokines: CCR-3 significantly increased with
SUB. GRO-y and GRO-a increased with WC at
both 18 and 24h. DEP had no effect with GRO-a.
Removal of metal from particles lowered response
of GRO-a.
Reference: Bayram DEP: (obtained from a 4JB1 -type, light-duty, 4 Route: Cell Culture
et al. (2006, 088439) cyl, 2.74-L Isuzu diesel engine)
Species: Human DEP-FCS: DEP + FCS
Cell Type: A549 DEP-NAC: DEP + N-acetylcystine, antioxidant
DEP-A: DEP +AE0L10113, catalytic
antioxidant
DEP-S: DEP + SP600125, inhibitor of JNK
DEP-N: DEP + SN50, inhibitor of NF-kB
Particle Size: DEP: 0.4/ym (mean diameter)
Dose/Concentration: DEP: 0, 5,
10, 50,100, 200/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: 24,48, 72h
Cell Growth: With 10% FCS (as a positive
control), A549 cells exhibited time dependent
growth. A mixture of FCS and DEP did not affect
cell growth for up to 48h. With DEP alone, cell
growth was prevented from cell number reduction
due to removal of serum at 48 and 72h. A dose of
10//gjmL induced a maximum proliferation effect.
Cell Cycle: DEP increased the percentage of
serum-starved cells in S phase at 48h. DEP
decreased the percentage in G0/1 phase and G2/M
phase.
Apoptosis: DEP prevented the increase in
apoptotic, serum-starved cells.
Protein Expression: p21 CIP1 /WAF1 expression
increased at 48h. DEP dose-dependently
decreased this expression.
NAC: NAC alone, at 33 mM, induced an increase
in cell numbers. DEP-NAC inhibited cell numbers at
48h. DEP-NAC inhibited cell numbers in S phase;
thus, cells in G0/1 phase increased. DEP-NAC
induced a further decrease of cells in G2/M phase.
AEOL10113: DEP-A caused a dose-dependent
decrease in cell numbers.
SP600125: Alone, SP600125 increased cell
numbers at 33mM. DEP-S decreased cell numbers.
Reference: Becheret SPM - suspended PM SRM-1648
al. (2007, 097125)
2007 #8030}
Species: Rat
Strain: CrlfWky
Cell Type: Alveolar
Macrophages,
Alveolar Type II
Gender: Male
Weight: 200g
Particle Size: SPM: 6-8 fjm
Route: Cell Culture (1.5x100
cells/well AM; 6x106 cells/well
Type II)
Dose: 200/yg/mL - 20/yg/cm2
Time to Analysis: 20h
Cytokines in Macrophages: SPM increased TNF-
a and MIP-2. NADPH inhibitor DPI reduced MIP-2
response, whereas iNOS inhibitor 1400W did not
affect either.
Cytokines in Type 2 Cells: SPM increased IL-6
and MIP-2 significantly. This SPM effect was
inhibited by DPI, whereas1400W reduced the IL-6
response significantly.
ROS in Type 2 Cells: SPM significantly increased
R0S formation. DPI largely blocked this SPM
effect.
ROS in Macrophages: No significant increases
were observed.
July 2009 D-34 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Becker et
al. (2005, 088590)
Species: Human
Gender: Male and
Female
Age: 18-35yrs
Cell T ypes: Alveolar
Macrophages, NHBE
PM (Coarse, Fine, Ultrafine): (EPA, Chapel H
NC, Chem Vol Cascade)
Particle Size: PM C: PMib; PM-F: PM0.1;
PM-UF: < 0.1/ym
Route: Cell Culture (0.5-1 x 10!l
cells/well NHBE; 2-3 x 10B/mL AM)
Dose/Concentation: NH BE: 25,
50,100, 250/yg|mLof PM;AMs:
50 /yglmL of DEP or 10ng/mL of
LPS
Time to Analysis: 18h for NHBE;
overnight for AMs
Cytokines: All 3 fractions induced dose-
dependent increases in IL-8 secretion with PM-c,
PM-F, PM-UF (in order of decreasing effects). TLR-
2 antibody blocked these particle induced IL-8
effects.
Inhibitors of Endotoxin effects and TLR-4
activation: No effects were observed in NHBE,
but all 3 fractions repressed the IL-6 release in
AMs.
TLR mRNA Expression: PM did not affect TLR-2
mRNA in NHBEs. PM-C and PM-F induced a slight
increase in TLR-4 mRNA in NHBEs while PM-UF
induced a substantial increase. PM-C increased
TLR-2 mRNA in AMs and decreased TLR-4 mRNA
in AMs.
Induction of Hsp70: PM-C and PM-F induced
Hsp70 in NHBE dose-dependently. Hsp70 was not
induced in AM following particle stimulator.
Reference: Becker et PM (Coarse, Fine, Ultrafine): (EPA, Chapel I
al. (2005, 088592)
Species: Human
Gender: Male
Age: 18-35yrs
Cell Types: Alveolar
NC, Chem Vol Cascade)
R0FA
Fe, Si, Cr Components
Oct 2001, Jan 2002, April 2002, July 2002
Particle Size: PM-C: 2.5-10/ym; PM-F:
Macrophages, NHBE < 0.1 //m; PM-UF: < 0.1 fjm
Route: Cell Culture (3-5x10E
cells/well NHBE; 2-3X106 cellsfmL
AM)
Dose/Concentration: NHBE: 11
/yg/mL of PM; AM: 50 /yglmL of
PM
Time to Analysis: 18-24h NHBE;
18h AM
IL-8 Release in NHBE: PM-C and PM-UF induced
effects. No effects from PM-F (all 4 dates).
IL-6 Release in AM: All 3 fractions induced
increase with later dates having generally lower
effects.
ROS (DCF): NHBE, at lower exposures, were
observed to be more responsive to PM than AMs.
AM exhibited highly variable results over time.
ROS (DHR): NHBE cells were observed to be more
responsive to PM than AMs. AM responsiveness
to PM increased over 4 time periods; this was not
observed in NHBE.
Seasonal Variability: Coarse particles were
more potent than F and UF regardless of the
month, and the potency for PM to induce IL-6/IL-8
production varied significantly. Coarse particles
induced a 5-25 fold change in IL-6 release for AMs
and a 3-6 fold change in IL-8 release for NHBEs.
Metal Correlation to IL-6/8 induction: Fe and Si
were positively associated with IL-6 release in
AMs incubated with the coarse fraction. Cr was
positively associated with IL-8 release in NHBE
cells incubated with F or UF.
Reference: Beck-
Speier et al. (2005,
156262)
Species: Human,
Canine (Beagle)
Cell Types: Human
AMs, Canine AM
(CAM)
DEP - SRM 1650a (NIST)
EC - Ultrafine Elemental Carbon (spark
discharge)
P90 - Printex 90 (Carbon Black, Degussa)
PG - Printex G (Carbon Black, Degussa)
Particle Size: (in diameter) DEP: 20-40nm;
EC: 5-1 Onm; P90:14nm; PG: 51 nm
Route: Cell Culture (1X106
cellsfmL AM)
Dose/Concentration: All
particles: 1 (EC only), 3.2,10,
100/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: 60min
Phagocytosis: All particles were phagocytosed
by CAM within 60 min.
Oxidative Potential: EC showed a very high
32, effect. DEP, P90 and PG had no effect
Formation of Lipid Mediators: DEP, EC P90 and
PG increased arachidonic acid and PGE2/TXB2 in
CAM in a dose-dependent manner. Only EC
increased LTB4 and 8-isoprostane.
ROS Activation: All particles increased activity in
canine macrophages with EC, P90 and PG
increasing activity in a dose-dependent manner.
DEP increased activity in canine macrophages.
Similar results were observed human alveolar
macrophages but only EC and P90 were tested.
Particle Mass vs Particle Surface Area:
PGE2/TXB2 effects were highly correlated with
particle surface area.
July 2009
D-35
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Bitterle
et al. (2006,156276)
Species: Human
Cell Type: A549
C-UFP - ultrafine carbonaceous particles
(obtained from a spark discharge aerosol
generator GFG 1000, Palas, Karlsruhe,
Germany)
Particle Size: 90nm (count median mobility
diameter)
Route: Cell Culture (3 x 107 cells)
Dose/Concentration: 44 ± 4
ng/cm2; 87 ± 23 ng/cm2; 230 ±
70 ng/cm2
(ng/cm2 - total mass of deposited
particles per cm2 cell monolayer
after 6h exposure)
Time to Analysis: 6h
Cell Viability: Exposure to clean air resulted in a
93.7 ± 9.1% viability. Exposure to low, mid nad
high doses of C-UFP resulted in a 94.9 ± 9.5%
viability. Thus C-UFP had no effect on cell
viability.
Interleukins: Clean air controls induced a 2-3 fold
increase in IL-6 and IL-8 production vs submersed
control. U-CFP exposures induced a similar effect
on IL-8 and IL-6 levels.
Antioxidant enzyme HO-1: The mid dose
increased transcription of H0-1 by 2.7 fold. There
was no observed effect at the high dose level
which indicates possible cytotoxcity.
Reference: Blanchet
et al. (2004, 087982)
Species: Human
Cell Type:16HBE
PM2.6
(Vitry-sur-Seine, Paris, France)
DEP - SRM1650a
CB - Carbon Black (Degussa)
Ti02 (Huntsman)
Particle Size: CB: 95 nm; Tith: 150 nm
Route: Cell Culture (45,000
cells/cm2)
Dose/Concentration: All
particles: 0.1,1,10, 30/yg/cm2
Time to Analysis: 6,18, 24, 30h
Amphiregulin Expression: DEP and PM2.6 both
increased AR mRNA expression from 6 to 30h,
with PM2.E inducing higher expression levels than
DEP. Both DEP and PM2.6 increased AR protein
secretion. No observed effect for CB and Ti02.
PM2.E induced protein secretion dose-dependently.
Signal Pathways in AR Secretion: MAP kinase
and tyrosine kinase inhibitors reduced effects of
DEP and PM2.6 but p38MAP kinase inhibitor did
not.
Role of Oxidative Stress: N-Acetylcysteine
blocked AR secretion following PM2.6. Antioxidant
enzyme catalase had no effect.
Cytokines: DEP induced a significantly high
release of GM-CSF, higher than PM2.6. EGFR
antibody reduced GM-CSF release at 0.25/yg/mL
dose.
Reference: Bonvallot DEP: SRM 1650
et al. (2001,
156283)1,
2001 #7852}
Species: Human
Cell Type:
16HBE14o-
0E-DEP: dichloromethane extract (2x) of DEP
nDEP: native DEP
sDEP: nDEP - 0E-DEP
CB: Carbon Black FR103 (Degussa)
BaP: Benzo[a]pyrene
CB: 95nm
NR
Particle Size: CB: 95nm; DEP: NR
Route: Cell Culture (3 x 10e cells)
Dose/Concentration: DEP, sDEP,
nDEP and CB - 10/yg/cm2
0E-DEP - 15/yg/mL
BaP - 0.25, 50 and 250/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: 24h
Proinflammatory Response: At 10/yg/cm2, nDEP
induced GM-CSF release by 4.7 fold. 0E-DEP
increased GM-CSF by 3.7 fold. BaP and sDEP also
induced increases of CN-CSF but had smaller
effect. CB had no effect.
NF-kB Activation: nDEP and 0E-DEP induced
enhanced degradation of IkB at 2-4h and 1 h
respectively. NF-kB DNA binding was enhanced by
0E-DEP (15/yg/mL, peak < 1 h) and nDEP (10
/yg/cm2, peak at 2-h with plateau till 4 h). Both
0E- and nDEP enhanced NF-kB DNA binding levels
were higher than BaP enhanced binding levels.
CYP1A1 mRNA: The CYP1A1 mRNA level was
markedly increased in nDEP and 0E-DEP treated
cells in comparison with their respective controls.
Radical Scavengers (decreased ROS in situ):
Increases of GM-CSF and NF-kB DNA binding by
nDEP and 0E-DEP was attenuated by radical
scavengers.
MAPK Activation: Increases by nDEP and 0E-
DEP of GM-CSF was inhibited by Erk1/2 inhibitor
but not by p38 inhibitors. Both nDEP and 0E-DEP
triggered Erk1/2 and p38 phosphorylation. sDEP
affected p38 phosphorylation only.
Reference: Brown et
al. (2007,156300)
Species: Human,
Mouse
Cell Type: PBMC,
A549 (Human):
J774A.1 (Mouse)
PM10 (London, England)
CM from PMio-treated human monocytes
Particle Size: PM10
Route: Cell Culture (1 x 10e
cells/mL J774A.1; 5X100 cells/mL
PBMC: 5X106 cells/well A549)
Dose/Concentration: PM10: 75//I
(10 /yg/mL); CM: 250 /y|; tBHP:
12.5/ym (in J774); TNF: 0,
500pg, 1 ng, 10ng ,
Time to Analysis: tBHP:1, 2, 4h;
PM: 4h; TNF: 18h
Cytokines: PM10 induced release TNF-a protein
from PBMCs at 10/yg/mL for 4h. Further inhibited
by verapamil and BAPTA-AM. Calmodulin inhibitor
W-7 had no effect. CM increased IL-8 from A549
cells 3 fold. Verapamil, BAPTA-AM and W-7
significantly inhibited IL-8 release induced by CM.
ICAM-1: A549 cells treated with TNF-a showed
dose-dependently effect of TNF-a on ICAM-1
upregulation at 18h. CM also induced
upregulation. Verapamil, BAPTA-AM and W-7 fully
inhibited CM-induced upregulation.
July 2009 D-36 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Calcabrini PM2.6 (Rome, Italy)
et al. (2004, 096865) Partic|e Size: PMis
Species: Human
Cell Type: A549
Route: Cell Culture (5 x 10"
cells/well)
Dose/Concentration: 30, 60
/yg/cm2 (aliquot of 0.1 /yglul)
Time to Analysis: 5, 24, 48, 72h
Particle Characterization: Components
measured include C-rich particles, Ca sulfates,
silica, silicates, Fe-rich particles, metals.
Carbonaceous particles made up majority of PM.
Cell Surface Changes: PM deposited on the cell
surface showed dose and time-dependent
increases in microvilli rearrangement and cell
shape alterations without affecting apoptotic
markers for up to 72 h.
PM internalization: At 24 h with the low dose,
aggregates of PM in cytoplasm or surrounded by
membrane was observed. With the high dose, large
particle aggregates often close to nuclear
envelopes were observed.
Cytoskeleton: At 72h PM induced dose-
dependent alterations from
rearrangementfinterweaving of microtubules to
bundling of microtubules with some
shortening/disruption.
Cell Growth: PM decreased cell growth in a dose
and time -dependently manner
ROS: PM increased R0S at the high dose for 5h
but not at 24 h or with the low low dose.
Cytokines: PM induced TNF-a peaked at 5h at
high dose and 48h at low dose, both ND at 72h.
PM induced IL-6 starting at 24 h thru 72h in time
and dose dependent manner.
Reference: Cao et al.
(2007,156322)
Species: Human
Cell Type: HAEC
NIST-DEP: collected using a diesel forklift and
hot bag filter system. (NIST, Minneapolis, MN)
C-DEP: obtained from a 30-kw (40 hp) four-
cylinder Deutz BF4M1008 diesel engine (U.S.
EPA)
Organic extract fraction of particles
NIST- DEP 2%
C-DEP 20%
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture (5 x 10E cells)
Dose/Concentration: NIST-DEP,
C-DEP: 0,12.5, 25,50,100, 200
/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: 1-4h
Cell Viability: DEP had no effect.
Stat3: Both DEPs induced time-dependent
phosphorylization of Stat3 in cytoplasm. NIST-
DEP induced phosphorylization dose-dependently
from 12.5 to 50/yglmL but stayed level at 100
and 200//gfmL. p-Stat3 induction was inhibited
by antioxidant BHA though it was reactivated
with exposure to H202. Reaction induced by
H202 was similar to that of DEP.
pStat3 Nuclear Transport: NIST-DEP induced
cytoplasmic pStat3 to move from cytoplasm into
nucleus.
pEGFR Dephosphorylation: After 4h of NIST-
DEP exposure, dephosphorylation was inhibited for
up to 90 min.
Reference: Chang C-
C et al. (2005,
097776)
Species: Human
Cell Type: A540,
THP-1
UfCB (Printex 90, Degussa)
Particle Size: 14nm diameter
Route: Cell Culture (7 x 10E cells)
Dose/Concentration: 100 //gfmL
Time to Analysis: 4h
ROS in THP-1 and A549: UFCB increased ROS.
NAC pretreatment blocked most of the UFCB-
induced ROS production.
VEGF in THP-1: UFCB increased VEG. NAC
decreased the UFCB effects below those of the
control.
VEGF in A549: Produced similar, but less marked,
results as with THP-1.
Reference: Chauhan
et al. (2004, 096682)
Species: Mouse
Strain: BALB/c
Cell Type: RAW
264.7 (leukemia virus
transformed
macrophages);
J774A.1 (from a
tumor); WR19M.1
(leukemia virus
transformed
macrophages)
EHC-T: total EHC-93 (Env Health Ctr, Ottawa,
Canada)
EHC-I: insoluble EHC
EHC-S: soluble EHC
SRM1648: urban particulate St.Louis (NIST)
SRM1649: urban dust/organics Washington
(NIST)
VERP: fine PM2.6 (Vermillion, Ohio)
Cristobalite: SRM 1879 (NIST)
TKk SRM 154b (NIST)
Particle Size: EHC-93: 0.5/jm (median
diameter); Cristobalite, SRM 1648, SRM
1649, Ti02,:NR; VERP: PM2.6
Route: Cell Culture (15000
cells/well)
Dose/Concentration: Particle
suspensions: 20, 50,100 /yg/well
LPS: 0-5 /yglmL
IFN-y: 0-1000 U|mL
Time to Analysis: Particles
added to culture at Oh, LPS and
IFN-y added at 2h. Parameters
measured after 22h incubation
period.
Stimulation with LPS/IFN-y: LPS and IFN-y each
induced NO release. Combination of LPS and IFN-y
produced larger effect in all cell lines. L-NMMA,
N0S inhibitor, suppressed most of the NO
production with 1OOnmol/L.
Cellular Viability and Cytotoxicity: Exposure of
cells to particulates did not result in overt
cytotoxicity or excessive loss of cellular material.
There was no correlation between the cytotoxicity
of the particles in the surviving cells and the loss
of protein mass in monolayers.
Nitrite Production: EHC-T, EH-93-I, SRM1648
and SRM 1649 produced dose-dependent
decreases. Cristobalite only decreased at higher
doses. No effect from EHC-S, VERP or Ti02.
iNOS: EHC-I, EHC-T, Crisobalite and SRM1648
inhibited iNOs expression. Ti02 had no effect. EHC
sol, SRM 1649 and VERP were not tested.
July 2009 D-37 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Chauhan
et al. (2005,155722)
Species: Human
Cell Type: A549
EHC-T: total EHC-93
EHC-I: insoluble EHC
EHC-S: soluble EHC
Cristobalite (Si02): SRM-1879
TiO?: SRM-154b
Particle Size: EHC-93: 0.4/ym (median
physical diameter): Tith, Si02: 0.3-0.6/jm
Route: Cell Culture (150000
cells/flask)
Dose/Concentration: All
particles: 0,1, 4, 8 mg/5ml
Time to Analysis: 24h
Cellular Viability: Decreased after exposure to
EHC-T, EHC-I and cristobalite. Rate of reduction
was not consistent across doses. EHC-S and Ti02
had no effect on viability.
ET-1: Release of ET-1 peptide decreased dose-
dependently for EHC-T, S and -I. Fractions of
EHC-S and EHC-I were more potent than EHC-T.
Ti02 and Cristobalite also reduced ET-1 secretion
although this was not consistent across the dose
range.
Cytokines: Results showed no detectable
amounts of GM-CSF, IL-1 (3 or TNF-a in cell
culture supernatants. IL-8 increased dose-
dependently with EHC-T, EHC-I and cristobalite.
VEGF: VEGF significantly increased dose-
dependently with EHC-T, EHC-S and cristobalite.
EHC-S induced a significant decrease in VEGF.
Gene Expression: mRNA levels for preproET-1
reduced at 24 h for all particle types. EHC-S
induced a significant decrease in ET-1 expression
at this high dose. ECE-1 mRNA expression
increased with EHC-T and EHC-I. Cither particles
had no effect. ETaR mRNA increased with EHC-T,
EHC-S, and Tith in biphasic manner where the
highest expression of mRNA was seen at the
middle dose levels. EHC-S had no effect. ETbR
mRNA increased with a low dose of EHC-T and
decreased with a high dose of EHC-T. EHC-S, EHC-
I and cristobalite induced an increase of ETbR.
Ti02 induced a significant decrease.
Proteases: mRNA levels for MMP-2 reacted
similarly to preproET-1. mRNA levels for TIMP-2
was significantly induced with EHC-I. EHC-T and
EHC-S induced small effects.
Reference: Cheng et
al. (2003,156337)
Species: Human
Cell Type: A549
DEP-h: DEP with high sulfur
DEP-LS: DEP with low sulfur
GEP: gasoline engine exhaust particles
Primed cells pretreated with TNF-a
Particle Size: DEP-h: 15.9nm; DEP-
LS: 17.7nm; GEP: 8.3nm
Route: In Vitro Cellular Exposure
(Exhaust flow-through cell culture
with air-cell-interface, exhaust
diluted 10-15x with 8x105
cellsfmL)
Dose/Concentration: DEP (total):
1.5-3.5x10e particles/cm3 air; GEP
(total): 1-2x100 particles/cm3 air;
TNF-y: 5ml (25 ng/ml)
Time to Analysis: 60-360 min
IL-8: DEP-h induced a 3 fold increase in IL-8 than
that of the control. DEP-LS also induced increases.
Primed cell cases had higher levels (1 Ox) than
unprimed when exposed to DEP-LS. DEP-h induced
higher levels of IL-8 than DEP-LS. This response
lasted for up to 6h. GEP induced a statistically
insignificant increase of IL-8 in unprimed cells.
With primed cells, GEP induced levels of IL-8 that
exceeded those of DEP-h and DEP-LS. This
response lasted for 1-2 h.
Reference: Chin et
al. 2002
Species: Rat, Human
Cell Line/Type: RAW
264.7 (Rat), MHS
Alveolar Macrophage
Cell Line (Rat), A549
(Human)
CB: (N339, with benzo[a]pyrene absorbed on
surface. Manufactured in Cabot, Boston, MA)
BaP
Benzo [a] pyrene 1, 6-quinone: BP-1.6-Q
(obtained from NCI, Kansas City, M0)
Particle Size: CB 0.1 /jm (mean diameter)
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration:
CB: 1, 2,4/yg/mL
BaP: 2/yg/mL
BP-1.6-Q: 1//M
Time to Analysis: 1-24h
HO-1 mRNA Expression: In RAW264.7, H0-1
mRNA levels increased with 2 and 4//gfmL at 2h.
Increases continued to 8h and declined by 24h.
BaP had no effect. BP-1.6-Q increased H0-1
mRNA after 1h and was maintained until 8h. In
A549 and MHS, H0-1 mRNA increased after 1 h,
peaking at 8h in A549 and 4h in MHS.
HO-1 Protein Expression: An increase of protein
was observed from 4-8h in RAW264.7.
AP-1: Increases in binding activity were observed
in RAW 264.7 cells at 2h.
July 2009 D-38 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Churg A
et al. (2005, 088281)
Species: Rat
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Weight: 250g
Cell Type: Epithelial
Cells of Tracheal
Explants
EHC93 (Ottawa Urban Air Particles)
TiFe - Iron-loaded fine Ti02 (obtained from
Aldrich Chemicals, Milwaukee, Wl)
3-4um EHC93
0.12 ± 1.4/ym Ti02
Particle Size: EHC-93: 3-4/ym (MMAD);
TiFe: 0.12 ± 1.4/ym (geometric mean
diameter)
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: EHC-93,
TiFe: 500 /yglcm2
Time to Analysis: 1, 24h. Some
experiments (referred to as 2h)
explants transferred to different
dish and incubated for additional
hour. Pre-treated with
InhibitorsfChelators for 2h.
Activation of NF-kB: Both particle types
increased nuclear translocation of NF-kB. TiFe and
EHC-93 increased NF-kB 1.5 fold at 1 h. TiFe
increased NF-kB 3.5 fold at 2h. EHC-93 increased
NF-kB more than 2 fold. Ti02 by itself did not
increase NF-kB at any exposure duration.
Activation of NF-kB into tracheal epithelial
cells:No evidence of dust particles was observed
(EHC-93 or Ti02> in the epithelial cell cytoplasm at
2h. No evidence of morphologic cell damage from
particles was observed.
Colchicine: Treatment with colchicine did not
prevent NF-kB activation.
Inhibitors/Activators: Tetramethylthiourea
(TMTU) (membrane-permeable active oxygen
scavenger), Deferoxamine (redox-inactive metal
chelator), PPS (Src inhibitor) AG1478 (epidermal
growth factor receptor inhibitor) prevented NF-kB
activation in both EHC93 and TiFe exposed-cells.
Iron-containing citrate extract of both dusts
increased NF-kB activation in both EHC93 and
TiFe exposed-cells.
Reference: Courtois
et al. (2008,156369)
Species: Rat
Strain: Wistar
Cell Line: Dissected
intrapulmonary
arteries from rats
used in corresponding
in vivo experiments
PM (SRM 1648)
(63% inorganic carbon, 4-7% organic carbon,
mass fraction > 1 %: Si, S, Al, Fe, K, Na)
UF carbon black (FW2, P60)
Particle Size: SRM 1648 mean diameter 0.4
/ym; ultrafine carbon black: FW2- 13nm, P60-
21nm
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 100, 200
/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: 24h incubation
NO: Generally, Ach-induced relaxation in
intrapulmonary arteries decreased, Ach-induced
cGMP accumulation decreased, and relaxation by
SNP or DEA-N0 also decreased. UF carbon black
did not affect NO responsiveness.
Oxidative Stress, Inflammatory:
Dexamethasone prevented SRM 1648-induced
impairment of the Ach relaxation response but
antioxidants did not. TNF-a, MIP2, IL-8 increased.
R0S was not affected.
Reference: Dagher et
al., (2007, 097566)
Species: Human
Cell Type: L132
(Normal Lung
Epithelial Cells)
LC10, LC50 - PM2.6
(collected Jan-Sept in Dunkerque, France)
Particle Size: cumulative frequency: 0.5/ym:
34%; 1 /ym: 64%; 1.5/ym: 79%; 2/ym: 87%;
2.5/ym: 92%; 5/ym: 98%; 10/ym: 100%
Route: Cell Culture (3 x 10e, 1.5 x
106, 0.75 x 106 cells/20mL)
Dose/Concentration: LC10:19
/yglmL; LC50: 75/yglmL
Time to Analysis: 24, 48 or 72h
p65 Protein: Phosphorylation of p65 increased in
PM-exposed L132 cells in dose-dependent manner.
IkBa Protein: Phosphorylated IkBa protein
concentrations increased in cytoplasm with both
particle types at all time points.
p65 and p50 DNA: p65 DNA binding increased at
24h with LC10 and LC50, at 48h with LC10, and
at 72h with LC10 and LC50. p50 DNA binding
increased at all time points with LC10 and LC50.
Reference: Dai et al
(2003, 087944)
Species: Rat
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Weight: 250g
Cell Type: Tracheal
Explants
gene expression but this increase was completely
prevented by SN50 and MAP kinase inhibitors
(SB203580 and PD98059). Neither TMTU or DFX
has any effect.
TGFpi : Treatment of explant with EHC93
approximately doubled gene expression for
TGFpi.Treatment with SN50, TMTU and fetuin
(TGFp antagonist) blocked increase. DFX, MAP
kinase inhibitors (SB203580 and PD98059) had
no effect. DEP roughly doubled TGFpi
expression.SN50 and MAP kinase inhibitors
(SB203580 and PD98059) fully blocked this
effect. TMTU and DFX had no effect.
EHC-93 (Environmental Health Center,
Ottawa)
DEP: SRM 1650a (NIST)
Particle Size: EHC-93: 3-4/ym (MMAD): DEP
1.55 ± 0.04/ym (CMD)
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: ECH, DEP:
500 /yglcm2
Time to Analysis: Exposed for
1h. Parameters measured
following a 7d incubation period.
Hydroxyproline: EHC93 induced an almost 3 fold
increase in explant hydroxyproline. DEP increased
tissue hydroxyproline 2.5 fold.
Procollagen: EHC-93 doubled gene expression of
procollagen. Procollagen gene expressioncould be
fully inhibited by SN50, TMTU or treatment of the
PM with DFX. Treatment of explants with p38 or
ERK (inhibitors) had no effect on procollagen
expression. DEP induced an increase in procollagen
July 2009
D-39
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Doherty
SP et al. (2007,
096532)
Species: Rat
Strain: NR8383
Cell Types: AMs
Ratios of: V: Fe; Al: Fe; Mn: Fe
V - sodium vanadate (NaV03)
Al - aluminum chloride hexahydrate (AlCh)
Mn - manganese chloride tetrahydrate
(M11CI2)
Fe - ferric chloride hexahydrate (FeCh)
Ratios based on PM2.6 measurements from
NYC, LA and Seattle
Particle Size: Metals from PM2.6 samples
Route: Cell Culture (2X10E
cells.i'niL)
Dose/Concentration: Fe - 16
/ymol (equivalent to urban NYC
500 /yg PM2.6); V and Mn tested in
molar rations of 0.02 to 0.4
relative to Fe; Al tested in molar
ratios of 0.125 to 8 relative to Fe.
Time to Analysis: 20h
IRP: Addition of V increased IRP activity 5 to 9
fold. Though there was no seeming dose
responsivity, IRP activity remained strongly
elevated over the range of V:Fe ratios tested.
Addition of Mn only resulted in an effect at 0.1
molar ratio (two-fold), not at higher or lower
ratios. Al resulted in peak increases of 5 fold at
molar ratios 2 while declining to 2 fold at molar
ratios 4 and 8.
Cytoxicity: Al was cytotoxic at molar ratios of 4
and 8. All other Al, V, Mn ratios had no effect.
Mixtures: The combination of metals tested at
NYC PM ratios and V drove all the Fe transport
activity. Combinations of V+Mn and V+AI
increased activity more than V:Fe alone.
Reference:
Doornaert, et al.
(2003,156410)
Species: Human
Cell Line/Type:
16HBE14o-; P-HBE
DEP: SRM 1650 (NIST)
CB: (Sigma, France)
DPC: Dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine (positive
control)
0.5um
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture (106-2x106)
Dose/Concentration: DEP and
CB: 1- 100/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: Parameters
measured 24, 48, 72h post
exposure. 1-HBE Cell Deadhesion
Capacity: 24h, evaluation of
detachment performed every 5min
for 40min after. Cell Wound Repair
Capacity: 24 h, repair evaluated
3.5, 7, 24 h after.
Cytotoxicity: DEP was cytotoxic at 100/yg/mL
at all time points in a time-dependent manner. CB
and DPC cytotoxicity was substantially lower but
significant at 72h.
Phagocytosis: 1-HBE cell levels that were in
contact with DEP or CB or have phagocytized
those particles increased in a dose-dependent
manner. DEP induced greater levels of cell contact
and phagocytosis than CB.
F-actin: Only DEPs were engulfed by F-actin
stained cell fragments.
Actin CSK Stiffness: DEP (5, 20,100/yglmL)
induced net dose-dependent decrease in
cytoskeleton stiffness and a dose-dependent
decrease in actin cytoskeleton stiffness. CB
produced no significant decrease.
Adhesion Molecules: DEP induced a concomitant
reduction of both CD49 (a3) and CD29 ((31)
integrin subunits and a decrease in level of CD44
(HBE cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion molecule) at
both 20 and 100/yg/mL.
Proteases: DEP also induced an isolated decrease
in MMP-1 expression without change in tissue
inhibitor of TIMP-1 or TIMP-2 at 100 /yglmL. CB
produced no change or insignificant results.
1-HBE Cell Deadhesion Capacity: DEP exposure
induced a dose-dependent amplification of cell
detachment at 5min of incubation and onward.
Cell Wound Repair Capacity: DEP inhibited
wound repair/wound closure in a dose-dependent
manner.
Reference: Dostert Asbestos
et al. (2008,155753)
Species: Human
Cell Line/Type:
THP1, monocyte-
derived macrophages
Silica
DEP
CSE: cigarette smoke extract
MSU: monosodium urate crystals
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: Asbestos:
0.1, 0.2 mg/mL; Silica: 0.1, 0.2,
0.25, 0.5 mglmL; DEP: 0.2, 0.25,
0.5 mglmL; CSE: 5%, 10% in
solution mg/mL; MSU: 0.1, 0.2
mg/mL
Time to Analysis: 1, 3, 6h
IL-10: Increased levels of IL-1p with asbestos
and silica were observed in THP1 at 6h. CSE and
DEP had no effect. MM also had increased levels
with asbestos, silica and MSU at high dose levels
only.
Caspase-1: Asbestos increased caspase-1
activity.
ROS: Asbestos doses in THP1 exhibited an
increase in ROS formation.
Reference: Doyle, et
al. (2004, 088404)
Species: Human
Cell Type: A549
from non-smoking
adults
BD: 1,3-butadiene, known carcinogen
Acrolein: photochemical and NO product of BD
in atmosphere
Acetaldehyde: photochemical and NO product
of BD in atmosphere
Formaldehyde: photochemical and NO product
of BD and ISO in atmosphere
ISO: isoprene, 2-methyl analog of BD
Methacrolein: photochemical and NO product
of ISO in atmosphere
Methyl vinyl ketone: photochemical and NO
product of ISO in atmosphere
Particle Size: NR
Route: Environmental Irradiation
(smog) Chambers
Dose/Concentration: 50 ppb NO;
200 ppbVISO, BD
Time to Analysis: Exposed to
gases for 5h. Analysis 9h post
exposure.
Cytotoxicity: ISO + NO and BD+NO induced small
increases of LDH in A549. However,
ISO+NO+light and BD+NO+light increased LDH
levels 4-6 fold indicating photochemical products
of ISO and BD are highly cytotoxic. LDH levels of
each combination were equivocal.
IL-8 Protein: Methacrolein, methyl vinyl ketone
and formaldehyde (products of ISO) increased IL-8
protein levels significantly. ISO+NO had no effect.
BD photochemical products (acrolein,
acetaldehyde and formaldehyde) also increased IL-
8 protein, more than doubling the photochemical
products induced by ISO. BD+NO had no effect.
IL-8 mRNA: IL-8 mRNA expression also increased
with photochemical products of ISO and BD but
did not reach a statistically significant level.
July 2009
D-40
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Duvall,
R.M. (2008, 097969)
Norris, G.A.
Dailey, L.A.
2008
Species: Human
Cell Type: Airway
Epithelial Cells
PM-F, -C, -UF
Particles collected from: Seattle, WA (PM-S);
Salt Lake City, LIT (PM-SL); Phoenix, AZ (PM-
P); South Bronx, NY (PM-SB); Hunter College,
NY (PM-HRterling Forest, NY (PM-SF)
Particle Size: Coarse: > 2.5/jm; Fine:
< 2.5 fjm; Ultrafine: < 0.1 fjm
Route: Cell Culture (100,000
cells/cm2)
Dose/Concentration: 5 mgfml
Time to Analysis: 1, 24h post
exposure
Particle Characterization: PM-HR, PM-SL and
PM-S contained the highest UF, F, and C
concentrations. PM-SB and PM-HR had similar F
and C concentrations. Sulfate was highest in PM-F
for all sites except in PM-SB and PM-HR. Wood
combustion was highest in PM-SL, PM-S, PM-P.
Soil dust was highest in PM-SL and PM-S.
IL-8: PM-UF induced a greater increase in IL-8
than other types of PM except PM-P. PM-UF is
associated with vanadium, lead, copper, sulfate.
PM-F-HR caused the greatest increase followed by
PM-SB. PM-F-SF and PM-F-P was least effective.
PM C also caused an increase in IL-8 levels and
was associated with vanadium and elemental
carbon.
COX-2: PM-F-S induced the greatest increase in
COX-2 expression. Other PM-F sites induced
similar increases. UF PM had no effect. PM-C,
associated with elemental carbon, induced
increases.
HO-1: PM-F-SF induced the greatest increase in
H0-1. PM-F-SL was the least effective. UF PM
had no effect. PM-C, associated with copper,
barium and elemental carbon, caused an increase.
Reference: Dybdahl
M et al. (2004,
089013)
Species: Human
Cell Type: A549
DEP: SRM 1650 (NIST)
Particle Size: 90nm (MMAD)
Route: Cell Culture (10E cells/mL)
Dose/Concentration: 0,10, 50,
100, 500 /yglmL
Time to Analysis: 2, 5, or 24h
Cytokines: DEP induced dose-dependent
increases of IL-1a, IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-a at 24 h.
Cytokines increased between 4 and 18 fold at the
highest DEP dose as compared to controlled cells.
DEP also increased IL-6 mRNA expression levels in
a dose and time-dependent manner.lL-6 mRNA
levels increased 14 fold at 24 hours, 8 fold at 5
hours, and 2 fold at 2 hours.
Cell Viability: DEP exposure did not decrease cell
viability at any dose tested.
Reference: Dybdahl
M et al. (2004,
089013)
Species: Mouse
Strain: BALB/CJ
Gender: Female
Age: 10wks
Weight: ~20g
DEP: SRM 1650 (NIST)
Particle Size: 90nm (MMAD)
Route: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: Single
exposure: 20 or 80 mg/m3; 4
exposures: 5 or 20 mg/ m3
Time to Analysis: Single 90min
or four 90min exposures.
Inflammation: DEP induced a dose- and time-
dependent expression of pro-inflammatory
cytokines. A single high dose of DEP induced an
increase in IL-6 mRNA levels persisting for at least
22 hours. However, at the same cumulative dose
given as 4 doses, the IL-6 level was only increased
1 hour after exposure.
Cytokines: Only IL-6 was induced after DEP
exposure. A single 90 minute inhalation (at 20
mgfm3) increase IL-6 gene levels dose-dependently
in the lung and was significantly higher than
control levels at both 1 and 22 hours post
exposure. Repeated exposures at 5 mgfm3 did not
affect IL-6 levels.
BAL Cells: Inhalation of DEP did not decrease
viability of BAL cells. 1 hour after the last dose,
mice exposed to 20 mgfm3 exhibited a 3 fold
increase in total cell numbers as compared to
control. The number of total cells and neutrophils
in BAL fluid were still increased 22 hours after
exposure to 20 mgfm3 DEP. BAL cell population
was not affected by repeated exposures to 5
mg/m3DEP. Lymphocyte numbers were also
unchanged by DEP.
July 2009
D-41
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Fritsch,
S.Diabate, S. (2006,
156452)
Species: Mouse
Cell Type: RAW
264.7
MAF02: incinerator fly ash (collected by
electrostatic precipitation in commercial
municipal waste incinerator facility)
composition representing 12% of total mass
(mg/g):
Fe (9.1); Pb (23.3); Zn (75.7); C (7.5)
Particle Size: 165nm (modal value)
Route: Cell Culture (1 x 10e
cells/well)
Dose/Concentration: 6.3-188
/yg/cm2 for Toxicity; 2.6, 6.5,
13.2/yglcm2 for Arachidonic Acid;
13.2/yglcm2 for MAPK Pathway;
Other doses noted in Effect of
Particles
Time to Analysis: 1, 2.5, 5, 24 h
Toxicity: Viability decreased from 99% to 18% at
62.5-188/yglcm2. Lower doses had no effect.
Arachidonic Acid: At 2.5h, AA level increased 2
fold for 6.5 /yglcm2 and 6 fold for 13.2/yglcm2.
No increase was observed after 5h.
MAPKs: Cells pretreated with PD98059, an
inhibitor of MEK-1, inhibited AA liberation due to
MAF02 treatment of 13.2 /yglcm2
COX-2: A time-dependent increase of COX-2
protein expression was exhibited at 2.5 and 5h.
ROS: A dose-dependent increase in ROS formation
was observed at concentrations greater than 31.3
/yg/cm2 after 3 hours.
GSH: There was an observed increase of
production at 20h. Doses greater than 60 //gfcm2
reduced total glutathione.
HO-1: There was an observed dose-dependent
increase in expression at 4 hours.
Reference: Fujii et al.
(2002, 036478)
Species: Human
Cell Type: HBEC
(from current
smokers), AMs, Co-
Culture: AMs + HBEC
Age: HBEC: 48-70yrs
PMio: EHC-93 (Ottawa, Canada)
Particle Size: PMio
Route: Cell Culture (HBEC: 2.5-3 x
10e cells/well); (AMs: 1.0 x107
total)
Dose/Concentration: 100, 500
/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: 2, 8, 24h
Viability: Over 90% of HBEC were viable after a
24 hour exposure of up to 500 /yglmL of PM. AMs
incubated with and without 100/yg|mL saw no
significant difference in viability.
Cytokine mRNA: TNF-a, GM-CSF, IL-1(3, IL-6,
LIF, 0SM and IL-8 mRNA expression increased in
co-culture with 100/yglmL at 2 and 8h. In AMs,
TNF-a, IL-1 (3, IL-6 mRNA expression increased
with 100/yglmL at 2h. IN HBECs, IL-1 p and LIF
increased with 100//gfmL at 2h. HBECs added to
AMs exposed to PMio, further increase in mRNA
of IL-1 (3, LIF and IL-8.
Cytokine Protein: In co-culture and AMs,
significant increase in protein production of GM-
CSF, IL-8, IL-1(3, IL-6 and TNF-a in dose-
dependent manner. GM-CSF and IL-6 production
significantly higher in co-culture then AM or HBEC
alone.
Bone Marrow: Co-culture instillation of
supernatants increased circulating band cell
counts at 6 and 24 h with 100 /yglmL.
Reference: Fujii, T.
Hayashi, S.
Hogg J.C. (2001,
156455)
2001
Species: Human
Cell Type: HBEC
from current smokers
Age: 48-70yrs
PMio:EHC93 (Ottawa, Canada)99% < 3.0um
Particle Size: PMio( 99% < 3.0/ym)
Route: Cell Culture (2.5-3 x 10e
cells/dish)
Dose/Concentration: 10,100,
500 /yglmL
Time to Analysis: 2, 8, 24h
Phagocytosis: 18.6% of cells engulfed particles
when exposed to 100 /yglmL. Over 90% remained
viable.
Cytokine mRNA: LIF mRNA increased dose-
dependently at 2h but declined at 8 and 24 h. GM-
CSF increased dose-dependently at 8h and peaked
at 24 h. IL-1 a increased at 2h, increased dose-
dependently at 8 h and peaked at 24 h. M-CSF,
MCP-1, IL-8 were unaffected.
Cytokine Protein: LIF, GM-CSF, IL-1 p and IL-8
increased dose-dependently. Soluble fraction of
100 /yglmL PMio did not affect cytokine
production.
July 2009
D-42
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Garcon,
G. Dagher, Z.
Zerimech, F. (2006,
096633)
Species: Human
Cell Type: L132
(Embryonic Lung
Epithelium)
PM2.6 (collected in Dunkerque, France for Elmo,
Jan-Sept)
Particle Size: PM2 6 0-0.5um (33.63%), 0.5-
1.0um (30.61%), 1.0-1.5um (14.33%), 1.5-
2.0um (8.69%), 2.0-2.5um (4.89%), > 2.5um
(7.87 %)
Route: Cell Culture: 3 x 10e
cells/20ml (24 h); 1.5 x 106
cells/20ml (48h); 0.75 x 100
cells/20ml (72h)
Dose/Concentration: 18.84,
37.68, 56.52,75.36,150.72
//g/mL; LC10- 18.84//g/mL; LC50-
75.36 //g/mL
Time to Analysis: 24, 48 or 72h
Cytotoxicity: PM induced dose-dependent
(R2 -.9907) cytotoxic effect in proliferating L132
cells.
LDH: Increase at 72 h with 56.52 and 75.36
//g/mL.
Oxidative Stress: A decrease in MDF activity
was observed at all exposure levels at 24, 48, and
72 h (72-h < 5 % of control). MDA levels showed
increase concentration after 72 h.both LC10 and
LC50. LC10 and LC50 saw an increase in SOD
activity at 24 h; LC50 saw a decrease in activity
after 48 and 72 h. 8-OHdG and PARP exhibited
increases at all time points with LC10 and LC50.
Inflammatory Response: Increases of TNF-a
concentration was exhibited at 24 h at LC50, and
at 48 h and 72 h at LC10 and LC50. ilMOS activity
increase at all time points at LC10 and LC50.N0
concentration exhibited increases at all time points
after exposure to LC10 and LC50.
Reference:
Geng H et al. (2005,
096689)
Species: Rat
Strain: Wistar
Tissue/Cell Type:
Lung macrophages
BPM: Blowing PM2.6
NPM: Non Blowing Normal PM2.B
Particle Size: PM2.6 PM collected from
Wuwei City, Gansu Province, China (Blowing
days correspond to desert storm days)
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 0, 33,100,
300 //g/mL
Time to Analysis: 4h
NOTE: Unless otherwise noted, results are
identical for BPM and NPM.
Cytotoxicity: Dosages greater than 150 //g/mL
decreased cell viability.
Plasma Membrane Fluidity: Dose-dependent
decrease had no effect on membrane lipid
hydrophilic region.
Plasma Membrane Permeability: LDH enzyme
activity and extracellular AP activity increased
dose-dependently, indicating increased membrane
permeability, but this was only statistically
significant at 300 //g/mL dose. NPM may affect
some parameters at 100//g/mL. Overall, NPM
induced a slightly higher increase than BPM.
Intracellular Ca2+: A dose-dependent increase
was observed.
Lipid Peroxidation (TBA): An increase was
observed only at 300 //g/mL.
Antioxidant (GSH): A decrease was observed
only at 300//g/mL.
Reference:
Geng H et al. (2006,
097026)
Species: Rat
Strain: Wistar
Tissue/Cell Type:
Lung macrophages
DPM: dust storm samples
NPM: normal PM
Particle Size: PM2.6 PM collected from
Baotou City, Inner Mongolia, China in March
2004
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 0, 33,100,
300 //g/mL
Time to Analysis: 4h
NOTE: Unless otherwise noted, results are
identical for BPM and NPM
Cytotoxicity: MTT reduction assay revealed a
significant decrease in cell viability at 150 //g/mL
and 300 //g/mL. LDH enzyme activity significantly
increased at 150 and 300 //g/mL.
GSH levels: Significant decreases were seen in
cellular GSH levels and increases in TBARS levels
in both groups with a 300 //g/mL dose.
Plasma Membrane Activity: In the plasma
membrane, Na.KATPase were significantly
inhibited. Ca2+Mg2+ -ATPase were unaffected.
Plasma Membrane Lipid Fluidity: Results
indicate that DPM could increase the surface
fluidity of membrane lipid.
Intracellular Ca2+: A dose-dependent increase in
free intracellular Ca2+ levels was observed.
Reference: Ghio et
al. (2005, 088272)
Species: Human
Cell/Tissue Type:
BEAS-2B
FAC: ferric ammonium citrate
(component of R0FA)
VOSO4: vanadyl sulfate
(component of R0FA)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 100//M
FAC - preexposed before metal
compounds or oil fly ash
50//M V0S04- preexposed before
metal compounds or oil fly ash
100//g/mL R0FA
Time to Analysis: 0-1 h, 4h
IRE DMT1: FAC increased mRNA and protein
expression for -IRE DMT 1. VOSO4 decreased
mRNA and protein expression for -IRE DMT 1.
+IRE DMT1 unaffected by any treatment.
Metal transport: Uptake of iron increased after
pre exposure to FAC and decreased after pre-
exposure to VOSO4. Pre exposure to FAC again
increase the uptake of both iron and vandium.
VOSOi induced opposite effect, decreasing Fe
uptake.
ROS: Increased acetaldehyde, indicating increased
oxidative stress. ROS decreased with FAC
pretreatment. ROS increased with VOSO4
pretreatment.
July 2009
D-43
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Gilmour
et al. (2004, 057420)
Species: Rat
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Cell/Tissue Type:
Alveolar macrophage
Coal Fly Ash
Mil - Montana Ultrafine
MF - Montana Fine
MC - Montana Coarse
KF - West Kentucky Fine
KC - West Kentucky Coarse
Coal combustion using a laboratory-scale
down-fired furnace rated at 50kW. Montana
subbituminous coal and western Kentucky
bituminous coal
Particle Size: Coarse: >2.5//m; Fine:
< 2.5/ym; Ultrafine: < 0.2/ym
Route: Cell Culture (2X10E
cells.i'niL)
Dose/Concentration: 125 //gfmL
or 250 /yglmL
Time to Analysis: 4 or 24h
LDH: Mid and high doses of Montana ultrafine
particles showed significant increase after 4 h
exposure vs control. Other particle types had no
effect. After 24 h, LDH level was not statistically
significant between particles tested and control.
Cytokines: Treatment with Montana ultrafine
particles resulted in a significant production
increase of TNF-a. MIP-2 showed increases in all
the fine and ultrafine treatments, with Montana
ultrafine and W. Kentucky fine PM showing the
highest increases. IL-6 increased with Montana
ultrafine particles although there was some
variability and the increases were not statistically
significant.
Reference: Gilmour PMio: Collected from the Marylebone and
et al. (2005, 087410) Bloomsbury monitoring sites in London, UK
Species: Human
Cell/Tissue Types:
monocyte derived
macrophages,
HUVECs, A549,
16HBE
Particle Size: PMio
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 50//gfmL
Time to Analysis: 4h, 6h, 20h
IL-8: PMio at 50//gfmL induced a significant
increase in IL-8mRNA and protein expression in
PMM and 16HBE at 6 and 20h. A less substantial
increase was also observed in A549.
Procoagulant Activity: PMio induced a
significant decrease in macrophage mediated
clotting time in 16HBE. Other cell types were
unaffected.
Annexin V Binding: At 100//gfmL, PMio induced
a significant increase in binding macrophages at 4
and 20h. There was no effect at 50 /yglmL.
Tissue Factor mRNA Expression: Expression
was increased in macrophages at 6 h only.
tPA Expression: mRNA expression decreased at
6h. Protein expression decreased at 4 h and 20 h
in a dose-dependent manner.
TF Expression: TF mRNA expression increased in
a dose-dependent manner at 6 h in HUVECs.
Protein levels also increased at 4 h but declined to
basal levels by 20h.
Reference: Gilmour
et al. (2003, 096959)
Species: Human
Cell/Tissue Type:
A549
PMio: Collected from the Marylebone and
Bloomsbury monitoring sites in London, UK
TSA
H202
NAC
Mannitol
Provided by Sigma Chemical, Poole, UK or
GIBCO-BRL, Paisley, UK
Particle Size: PMio
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: PMio: 100
/yg/mL; TSA: 100 nglmL; H202:
200//M; NAC and Mannitol: 5 mM
Time to Analysis: 24h
IL-8: PMio, TSA and H202 treatment induced an
increase of IL-8. Concomitant exposure of TSA
with PMio or H202 significantly increased IL-8
release when compared to PMio or H202 alone. IL-
8 mRNA expression with PMio or H202 exposure
and TSA coincubation caused significant
increases. Silver staining of PCR products
indicated that the IL-8 gene promoter was
associated with acetylated H4 following TSA,
PMio and TNF treatment.
H4: PMio exposure significantly increased
acetylation levels of H4 over controls. Increased
acetylated H4 was mediated by PMio in a dose-
dependent manner. Treatment with PMio and
H202 increased HAT activity associated with H4
by 245% and 166% respectively. Significant
increases in acetylation of H4 following treatment
of cells with TSA, PMio and H202 for 24 h was
observed. PMioinduced HAT activity was
significantly decreased in the presence of NAC
and mannitol. Nuclear presence of HDAC2 protein
was significantly reduced by exposure to both
HDAC inhibitor and PMio. There was a decreasing
trend in HDAC2 gene expression following TSA
and PMio treatment.
NF-I
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Graff DW
et al. (2007,156488)
Species: Human
Cell/Tissue Type:
HAEC
PM
-UF: ultrafine
¦F: fine
¦C: coarse
Particles collected from Seattle, WA (-S), Salt
Lake City, LIT (-SL), Phoenix, AZ (-P), South
Bronx, NY (-SB), Hunter College, NY (¦
H), Sterling Forest, NY (-SF)
Particle Size: UF: <0.1 /jm; F: 0.1 ¦ 2.5/jm;
C: 2.5-10/ym
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 250//gfmL
Time to Analysis: 6h, 24h
Gene Expression: PM-UF, PM-F, and PM C both
upregulated and downregulated genes in the
HAECs though downregulation was far more
common for all the three PM fractions. PM-F
affected the greatest number of transcripts,
followed by the UF and C fractions.
IL-8: mRNA expression increased, with PM-F-S
having the greatest impact. Aluminum, strontium,
manganese and potassium were highly associated
with expression. Wood combustion was
moderately associated.
HOX-1: mRNA expression increased, with PM-F-
SF having the greatest impact. Potassium,
manganese, strontium and wood combustion were
highly associated with expression. Aluminum and
vanadium were moderately associated.
Reference: Gualtieri
M et al. (2005,
097841)
Species: Human
Cell Type: A549
TD: Tire debris extracted in methanol,
constituent of PMio
(generated by spinning a new automotive tire
against abrasive surface)
Particle Size: 10-80/ym
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 10, 50, 60,
75/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: 24,48, 72h
Cytotoxic Effect: Treated cells presented
inhibitory effect on reduction of MTT which
appeared to be dose and time-dependent. A
statistically significant reduction was observed at
48 and 72 h. Trypan blue showed a significant PM
lethality as well as a dose-dependent increase in
mortality.
DNA Damage: At 24 and 72 h, DNA damage
increase dose dependently in damaged and ghost
cells.
Cell Cycle Analysis: At 24 h, TD extract-treated
cells presented a significant increase in the
percentage of cells in G1 phase when compared
with control. This increase was associated with a
decrease in the percentage of cells in S phase. At
48 and 72 h, the increase in percentage of cells in
G1 was associated with a decrease in the
percentage of cells in both S and G2/M phases.
Cells exposed to TD extracts presented changed
morphology. Modifications most obvious at 72 h.
The highest dost produced increased vacuolization
in cytoplasm and apoptotic nuclear images.
Reference: Hetland PMC - Coarse
et al. (2005, 087887) p|yp = pjne
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: CrlfWky
Cell Type: AMs
¦A - Amsterdam
¦L - Lodz
¦R - Rome
¦0 - Oslo
Coexposures PAH, Fe, Al, Zn, Cu, V
Particle Size: PMC: 2.5-10 fjm; PMF: 0.2-
2.5/ym
Route: Cell Culture (1.5x100
cells/well)
Dose/Concentration: 50,100
/yg/mL PM
Time to Analysis: 20h
IL-6: PMC from all cities exhibited increases in IL-
6 release with spring and summer roughly equal
and both inducing higher levels than the winter
PMC. For the Spring and Summer samples, PMC-L
exhibited the highest IL-6 releases (440% and
460% respectively) followed by Rome,
A'dam/Oslo, and Oslo/A'dam. For the winter
samples, Rome and Amsterdam induced higher IL-6
levels (340% and 300% respectively) than Lodz
and Oslo (165% and 160%). The fine fractions did
not induce any significant cytokine release.
TNF-a: PMC from all cities increased TNF-a
release with 50//g/mL generally inducing a slightly
higher increase than 100 //gfmL.
Constituent Correlation: Levels of Fe, Al, Zn, Cu
and V as well as PAH (total and fractions) showed
no correlation with IL-6 release.
Endotoxin Correlation with IL-6 release: A
confirmatory test revealed no correlation.
July 2009
D-45
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Hetland
RB et al. (2004,
097535)
Species: Rat, Human
Cell Type: Alveolar
Macrophages (Rat),
A549 (Human)
Strain: WkylNHsd
(Rat)
Gender: Male (Rat)
Weight: 180-230g
(Rat)
AMC - Ambient Coarse
AMF - Ambient Fine
AMUF - Ambient Ultrafine
(AM samples taken at a suburban site,
without a dominating PM source, near
Utrecht, Netherlands)
Road PM: PMio, (collected in a road tunnel
with predominating road abrasion due to use
of studded tires in Trondheim, Norway)
Particle Size: AMC: 2.5-10/jm; AMUF:
< 0.1 fjm
Route: Cell Culture (1 x 10e
cells/well)
Dose/Concentration: 0,100,
200, 400, 600, 800,1000 //g/mL
Time to Analysis: 20h (Type 2
cells): 40h (A549 cells)
IL-8: All 3 AM fractions showed dose-dependent
increases in A549 cells until 600//gfmL; at that
concentration, levels declined. AMC showed the
most pronounced decline which correlates with
decreased viability. Road PM showed a near linear
response until 1000/yglmL, whereas DEP
plateaued at 600 //gfmL in A549.
MIP-2: AMC and AMUF had no effect on Type 2
cells. DEP induced increases at 200//gfmL,
whereas Road PM induced the strongest increase,
peaking at 600 //gfmL in Type 2 cells.
IL-6: AMC induced increases at 100/yg|mL in Type
2, but levels declined below normal at 200 //gfmL.
AMUF induced a decline of IL-6 levels. Road PM
induced significant increases in Type 2. DEP had a
slight effect. AM fractions induced increases in
A549 cells, peaking at 600/yglmL with AMF. DEP
and Road PM induced a dose-dependent increase.
Cell Survival: AMC showed major effects at 200
//g/ml_ in Type 2. AMUF showed effects at 400
/yglmL. Road PM and DEP showed a gradual
decline from 75% to 50% at 800 /yglmL in Type
2. All AM fractions induced a decrease in viability
after 600/yg/mL in A549 with AMC inducing a
larger decrease than AMUF and AMF; AMUF and
AMF induced similar levels. Road PM and DEP had
no effect on A549.
Apoptosis: AMC elicited a marked induction of
apoptosis 200 /yglmL in Type 2 cells. AMF
showed a dose-dependent increase in A549. Other
AM fractions showed some slight increases in
both cell types. Statistical significance was
reached for all particles except for Road PM.
Reference: Holder AL DEP: generated from a single cylinder diesel
et al. (2008, 093322) engine using , commercial certified #2 diesel
fuel
Species: Human
Cell Type:
16HBE14o
Copollutants: NOx 7 ppm, CO2 0.1%
Particle Size: Suspension: 223nm (mean
diameter); ALL 122nm (mean diameter)
Route: Suspension (1x106
cells/cm2). Air Liquid Interface
(ALI, 1x10B cells/cm2)
Dose/Concentration: Suspension:
0.13, 0.24,1.88, 2.5, and 12.5
/yg/cm2;ALI: 1 g/cm3 (total number
of particles: 2.3 x 107
particles/cm2)
Time to Analysis: Exposure for
6h. Parameters measured 20h
postexposure.
ALI vs Tracheal Bronchial (TB) Deposition: The
TB region deposition is 1.5 nominally x ALI, but
particle diameter deposited in the TB was 62 nm
(geometric mean diameter) as compared to the
particle deposition in the ALI, measuring 260 nm.
Inflammatory Response: Suspended DEP
decreased viability at concentrations of 2.5
/yg/cm2or higher. IL-8 release (corrected for
viability) increased at concentrations of 1.88
/yglcm or higher in a dose-dependent manner. IL-8
exhibited intermediate levels of secretion between
in vitro levels of 0.25 and 1.88 /yglcm2. No
statistically significant results were observed in
ALI. Viability for ALI was near 100% (75%
uncorrected).
Reference: Huang et
al. (2003, 087376)
Species: Human,
Mouse
Cell Type: BEAS-2B
(human), RAW 264.7
(mouse)
PMC: PM coarse
PMF: PM fine
PMSM: PM submicron
Collected between September-December 2000
from 4 ambient monitoring stations in Taiwan
that represented background, urban, traffic,
and industrial sites
Particle Size: PMC: 2.5-10 fjm; PMF: 1 -2.5
/jm; PMSM: < 1 /jm
Route: Cell Culture (5X10E
cells.i'niL)
Dose/Concentration: All PM: 50,
70,100/yg|mL
Time to Analysis: BEAS-2B: 8h;
RAW 264.7: 16h
Viability: None of the PM fractions affected cell
viability.
IL-8: Only PMSM induced a significant IL-8
increase in BEAS-2B. IL-8 response was
associated with a combination of Mn and Cr
(R2 - 0.28). Response was also correlated with
nitrate, although significance disappeared when 1
extreme nitrate value was removed.
Lipid Peroxidation: Only PMSM enhanced lipid
peroxidation in BEAS-2B, correlating with both
elemental and organic carbon.
TNF-a: In RAW264.7, PMSM increased TNF
production. Polymixin pretreatment significantly
reduced TNF levels for all 3 PMs which indicates
an endotoxin role in macrophage response. TNF
production (after polymixin pretreatment only) was
associated with Cr and Fe content.
July 2009
D-46
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Hutchison PMio: Samples collected for 7d during closure
et al. (2005, 097750) (-C) and reopening of steel plant (-R)
Species: Mouse PMT: PM total (aqueous sonicate)
Cell Line: J774.1A PMS: PM soluble aqueous
PMI: PM insoluble aqueous
Particle Size: PMio
Route: Suspension
Dose/Concentration: 500/j\
(estimated concentrations of 112,
143,156,180, 233, 255 //g/1 ml
water)
Time to Analysis: 4h
Particle Characterization: Reopening of the
plant showed a significant increase in the total
and acid extractable metal content of PM.
Aqueous extractable metal content did not
change. Soluble zinc, copper and manganese also
increased significantly post reopening. Iron was
the most abundant in acid extractable metals and
increased greatly at the reopening.
TNF-a: PMT-R and PMT-C induced a statistically
significant increase. Treatment with chelation
agent reduced effect to control levels.
Reference: Imrich A UAP: SRM 1649 (positive control)
et al. (2007,155859) Ti02. Partic|e contm|
Species: Rat
Gender: Female
Age: 12-14wks
Cell Type: AM
CAPs (Boston, MA)
All cells primed with LPS
Coexposure with NAC, dimethylthiourea
(DMTU), H202 or catalase
Particle Size: CAPs: n2.5/jm; UAP: PM2.6;
TiO2: ~ 1 /jm
Route: Cell Culture (2 X10!l
cells/well)
Dose/Concentration: Caps
100/yg/mL; UAP: 50 or 100
/yglmL; LPS 250 nglmL; NAC,
DMTU: 2,10, 20mM; Catalase: 1,
5,10mM; H202 0-50/ym/hr
Time to Analysis: 18-20h
TNF: DMTU at 20mM reduced TNF in LPS-primed
cells in control and UAPtreated groups. NAC at
20mM reduced TNF release but this was not
statistically significant. Catalase significantly
inhibited TNF in control and UAP treated groups.
CAPs (especially the insoluble portion) significantly
increased TNF unless co-exposed with NAC,
DMTU or catalase. All three reduced levels back to
around basal levels. DMTU was particularly
effective at diminishing TNF release. H202
increased TNF release in CAPs-exposed cells. Ti02
had no increased ability to induced cytokine
release when mixed with H202.
Cell Death: Viability decreased substantially
when exposed to H202 + CAPs. The soluble
fraction of CAPs showed to be more effective
with H202 than the insoluble portion. Ti02 had no
significant effect.
NO: Some CAPs induced slight increases when
mixed with H202. No difference was observed
between soluble and insoluble portions of CAPs.
DFO: DF0 at 0.05mM completely inhibited
oxidation induced with soluble CAPs + H202.
Insoluble CAPs + H202was also DFO-sensitive.
DFO was ineffective against the insoluble CAPs
induction of TNF and MIP-2.
Reference: Ishii et al.
(2004,088103)
Species: Human
Cell Type: A549
(collected from 6
lobectomy or
pneumonectomy
smokers), HBEC
EHC-93:PMio (obtained from Environmental
Health Directorate, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada)
Particle Size: PMio
Route: Cell Culture (1x10E7 cells)
Dose/Concentration: 100 //gfmL
Time to Analysis: 3, 6, 24h
Cytokines: TNF-a, IL-1(3, GM-CSF, IL-6, and IL-8
levels were significantly increased in A549 cells.
mRNA Expression: MCP-1, ICAM-1 and IL-8
mRNA expression increased in untreated AM
supernatants at 3h. Only the MCP-1 levels were
statistically significant at 3h. Levels declined by
6h. When A549 cells were exposed to PMio
exposed AM, levels of RANTES, TNF-a, ICAM-1,
IL-1 p, and LIF increased. Except for RANTES
mRNA, these differences were less in the 6h
samples. VEGF increased as well, but this increase
was not statistically significant.
TNF-a and IL-1 p-neutralizing Antibodies: IL-
1 p antibody alone or in combination with TNF-a
significantly reduced expression of all eight
mRNAs. Combinations for some mRNAs reduced
expression by up to 1/2. This effect was not
observed when A549 was treated with the control
AM.
Transcription Factor Binding Activity: Binding
of AP-1 and Sp1 increased when A549 treated
with supernatants from PMio-exposed AM, but not
from control AM.
July 2009
D-47
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Ishii H et
al. (2005, 096138)
Species: Human
Cell Type: AMs
(obtained from 10
smokers who stopped
smoking 6wks prior),
HBEC
EHC-93: PMio (obtained from Environmental
Health Directorate, Ontario, Canada)
Particle Size: PMio
Route: Cell Culture (HBEC: 2.5-
3.0x106 cells: AM: 1x107 cells: co-
culture of AM/HBEC: 5x100 cells)
Dose/Concentration: 100 //gfmL
Time to Analysis: 2, 24h
mRNA Expression after 2h exposure: AM or
HBEC exhibited no effect. In contrast, co-culture
increased expression of MIP-1 p, GM-CSF, M-CSF,
IL-6, MCP-1 and ICAM-1-mRNA.
mRNA Expression after 24 h exposure: AMs
exhibited no effect. HBEC increased levels of GM-
CSf, LIF and ICAM-1. Co-culture, on the other
hand, increased expression of MIP-1 p, GM-CSF,
M-CSF and ICAM-1 mRNA.
Protein Levels: AM and HBEC both increased
GM-CSF, IL-6 and MIP-1 p release into the
supernatant. Co-culture effect was not additive
but synergistic (i.e., higher than expected). MCP-1
levels did not increase significantly. Co-culture
appeared to decrease protein levels for both the
control and PM values. M-CSF levels increased for
co-culture only.
Surface Expression of ICAM-1: Upon 24h
exposure to PM, HBEC exhibited an increase in
expression. Expression in AMs were not affected
by 2h PM stimulation.
ICAM-1 Inhibitors: IgG or anti-CDUb antibody
was unaffected in co-culture.
Reference: Jalava P
et al. (2005, 088648)
Species: Mouse
Cell Type: RAW
264.7
UPM: SRM1649a (Washington, DC)
DEP: SRM1650 (NIST)
EHC-93: Ottawa dust (Environmental Health
Center, Ottawa, Canada)
HFP-00: Pooled ambient air PM2.6 sample from
Helsinki, Finland
M-UPM: methanol extract of UPM
Particle Size: SRM 1649a, SRM 1650, EHC-
93: NR; HFP-00: PM2.1,
Route: Cell Culture (5 X10!l
cells.i'niL)
Dose/Concentration: 150 //gfmL
Time to Analysis: Methanol
treatment of PM samples: 24h;
Exposure to ambient PM samples:
2,4, 8,16, or 24h.
TNF-a: All the PM samples increased TNF-a.
Cell Viability: SRM1649a exhibited the most
cytotoxicity, followed by HFP-00 and EHC-93.
Methanol significantly affected cytotoxicity of the
EHC-93 sample only.
Cytokines: TNF-a concentrations in the cell
culture medium significantly increased at all time
points between 2 and 24 h. The highest increase
was seen in EHC-93. IL-6 production also
increased at different levels with the highest
increase observed in EHC-93. No response was
observed for IL-10.
Cell Viability: Duration of exposures had no
significant effect on any of the samples. A 2h
exposure time was sufficient to induce the typical
reductions in cell viability.
Reference: Jalava PI
et al. (2006,155872)
Species: Mouse
Cell Type: RAW
264.7
PM: Collected east of Helsinki, Finland
between Aug 23 and Sept 23, 2002
Divided in 12 groups (4 sizes by 3 exposure
types):
¦S: seasonal average
¦W: wildfire
¦M: mixed
¦B: blank
Particle Size: PMio 2.5; PM2.B-1: PM1-0.2;
PM0.2
Route: Cell Culture (5x106
cellsfmL)
Dose/Concentration: 15, 50,
150 and 300/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: 24h
Particulate Mass Concentrations in HVCL Size
Ranges: The largest increase of PM
concentrations was observed in PM1-0.2.
NO: All 12 samples increased NO production when
compared to corresponding unexposed controls.
Peaks were observed at 150 /yglmL, except in
PM1-0.2.
Cytokines: All 12 samples increased TNF-a and
IL-6 production. PMio-2.5 and PM2.B-I produced a
much larger response than PM1-0.2 and PM0.2.
IL-6 production for PM0.2 was not measured.
MIP-2 production also increased with similar
trends.
Cytotoxicity: All 12 samples induced dose-
dependent decreases in cell viability. PMio-2.5
were the least active inducers of apoptosis while
PM0.2 showed the highest activity (4-17% of
apoptotic cells).
July 2009
D-48
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Jalava et
al. (2007, 096950)
Species: Mouse
Cell Type: RAW
264.7
Urban background PM
PMio, PM2.6, and PM0.2 collected from 6
European cities during different times of the
year from October 2002 to July 2003:
D: Duisburg (Fall)
P: Prague (Winter)
A: Amsterdam (Winter)
HR: Helsinki (spring),
B: Barcelona (spring)
AT: Athens (summer)
Particle Size: PM10: 2.5-10 /jm; PM2 b: 0.2-
2.5/jm; PM0.2: <0.2//m
Route: Cell Culture (5 X10!l
cells.i'niL)
Dose/Concentration: 15, 50,
150, 300/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: 24h
PM Characterizations: The highest mass
concentrations of PM10 and PM0.2 were
measured in Athens. Prague had the highest PM2.6
concentrations.
NO: All PM fractions induced statistically
significant NO production in macrophages. PM2.6 -
P and PM2.6 -AT produced significantly larger
responses, though all samples at 150 and 200
/yglmL induced statistically significant production.
When compared to the other PM0.2 samples, -P
and HR produced significantly larger responses.
Cytokines: PM10 showed average cytokine
production to be 7.8 fold and 83 fold for TNF-a,
and 4.4 fold and 530 fold for MIP-2 when
compared to PM2.6 and PM0.2 respectively. PM10
induced statistically significant increases in
production of TNF-a, MIP-2 and IL-6. PM2.6, with
exception of Prague, caused significant increases
in cytokines. PM0.2-A and -AT showed small yet
statistically significant increases in TNF-a. An
increase in MIP-2 was observed with -P and -HR.
IL-6 increased significantly with PM10 and slightly
with PM2.6. In the PM0.2 range, only the -A and -
AT samples caused a small, statistically
significant TNF- a production. MIP-2 production
was only detected from the -P and -HR samples.
PM0.2 effects on IL-6 response were negligible.
Cytotoxicity: The average cytotoxicity of PM10
and PM2.6 were roughly equal, but PM0.2 were
less cytotoxic with the exception of -P. The dose-
response trends for most of the samples were
linearly declining, with PM10 and PM2.6 exhibiting
statistically significant declines in viability.
Reference: Jimenez PM10: Collected from London and Edinburgh
et al. (2002,156610) air particulate monitoring stations.
Species: Human Ti02
Cell Type/Line: UFTi02 Both fine and ultra fine Ti02 fractions
A549, THP-1, Mono obtained from Tioxide Europe (London, UK)
Mac 6 (DSMZ) and Degussa-Huls (Cheshire, UK)
Particle Size: PM10, Titk 200nm; UFTi02:
20nm
Route: Cell Culture (110,625
cells/well)
Dose/Concentration: PM10, TiOy,
UFTi02: 100 //g/mL; TNF-a:
10ng/mL
Time to Analysis: 4h
NF-I
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Jung et
al. (2006,132421)
Species: None
Type: Surrogate Lung
Fluid
Soot Particles: Generated using a co-flow,
laminar, diffusion flame system
CB (Degussa)
PM2.E: Collected using IMPROVE air pollution
samplers
Particle Size: Soot: 185nm; CB: 25nm, PM2 t
Route: Surrogate Lung Fluid
Dose/Concentration: Soot: 0-
30mg: CB: 5-1 Omg: PM2.6: 50 or
100/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: Parameters
measured continuously over 2h.
OH Radical Formation: Formation occurred with
linear dependence on soot mass. Average response
was 0.89nmol OH produced per mg of soot.
Formation also occurred with soot + hydrogen
peroxide. Hydrogen peroxide alone did not form OH
radicals.
Fe: Average Fe concentration in soot particles
was 305 ± 172nM. Observed negative correlation
between amount of Fe and amount of OH radical
formation. DSF inhibited iron-induced increase in
OH radical formation.
Carbon Black: OH radical generation by carbon
black was significantly less than soot. OH
generation by CB was observed to be linearly
proportional to PM mass, but CB was much less
efficient at generating the OH radical.
PM2.5: A high variability in the increase of OH
radicals was observed with PM2.6. Pretreatment
with DSF partially blocked OH radical production,
but a significant level remained. This may be due
to PM2.E containing high levels of Fe and Cu.
Reference: Kafoury
and Madden (2005,
156617)
Species: Mouse
Cell Type: RAW
264.7
DEP: SRM 1975 (purchased from NIST,
Rockville, MD)
BAY11-7082, NF-kB inhibitor (coexposure)
IL-1B: obtained from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA)
Particle Size: DEP: 0.3/ym (mean diameter)
Route: Cell Culture (3-4x106 cells) TNF-a: DEP induced a significant release of TNF-a
Dose/Concentration: DEP 25,
100, or 250 /yglmL; IL-1B: 100
ng/mL
Time to Analysis: DEP: 4h pre-
treated with BAY11 -7082 for
1.5h; IL-1B: 4h
at 100 and 250 //gfmL dose-dependently.
Exposure at 25/yg/mL had no effect. IL-1 (3
containing PM samples at 100 //gfmL also
resulted in a significant release of TNF-a.
NF-I
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Katterman ME et al.
(2007, 096358)
Species: Rat
Cell Type/Line: RLE-
6TN (Alveolar
Epithelial Cell Line)
PM: Oils: OAAF, Oil Q, Oil III, NF2
PM: Coal Germany and Ohio
Diesel particulates: ZODDA (doped with Zn),
ZSDDA (doped with Zn and S): S: PMs
washed in solution; F: Fresh samples;L:
Leached
AI2O3, Fe203, Si02, Ti02,Zn0 also tested
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture (cytotoxicity:
50,000 cells/well; SEM: 25,000
cells)
Dose/Concentration: Oils
0.2mg/mL; Coals 0.7mg/mL; Diesel
0.01 mg/mL; AI203 0.5mg/mL;
Fe203 0.7mg/mL; Si02 0.7mg/mL;
Ti02 0.7mg/mL; ZnO 0.05mg/mL
Time to Analysis: 24h
Metabolic Activity: For oils comprised of 3/4
fresh and 1|4 leached, metabolism decreased.
Coals (fresh and leached) had no effect. ZODDA-F
and ZSDDA-F both induced decreases in activity.
ZSDDA-L had no effect.
Cellular Morphology: PM S had a minimal effect.
PM-F induced widespread cell damage.
Constituent Differences between PM-F and
PM-L: In oil samples Cu, Ti and Ca salts were
removed upon washing. Fe, Al, Si remained
constant.
Grinding Effects: Coal toxicity increased upon
grinding, whereas diesel PM toxicity decreased
upon grinding.
Metal Oxide Effects: Only Si02, and ZnO (much
higher at lower concentrations than other metal
oxides) decreased metabolic activity. Fresh,
washed and sonicated samples exhibited similar
results. Grinding only affected Ti02 (increase) and
ZnO (decrease).
Reference: Kendall et
al. (2004,156634)
Species: Human
Tissue Type: BALF
(obtained by
bronchoscope from 6
nonsmokers and 3
smokers)
PM2.6 sample sites; 2 schools in Bronx, NY, 6
background urban, 6 urban roadside. Sampling
occurred 24h/day for 12d.
Particle Surface Chemistry: 79-87%
carbonaceous material (Ch, COO, C-(0,N)), 10-
17% 0 (01 s), 1.5-4% N (NH4+, N-C, NOs 2-),
0.6-1% S, and 0.3-2% Si.
Only NO3 - higher in roadside samples.
NH4 and NO3 - correlated with NO and NOx in
air but not NO2.
Particle Size: PM2.6
Route: BALF treatment
Dose/Concentration: 5-10ml of
0.5M NaClor BALF
Time to Analysis: Filters treated
with BALF for 4h
Saline Washing: Removed particles and
decreased NH4, N0:i,0 and S relative to C1.
BALF treatment (XPS): PM2.6 surfaces interacted
strongly with BALF within hours of contact.
Specific surface components of PM2.6 immersed in
BALF were desorbed while biomolecules from
BALF were adsorbed to particles. N-C on the PM
surface increased 3 fold for smokers and 4 fold
for nonsmokers (range 1.4-7.4). This is most likely
related to protein-like adsorption on PM.
Treatment also induced a slight increase in COO
and decreases in NH4, NO3, 0 and S.
ToF-SIMS - Organics: Particle loading and
surface hydrocarbons showed a linear correlation.
Loss of hydrocarbons from PM2.6 surface averaged
55% (10-75) after undergoing saline and BALF
washes. In only 3/12 samples BALF removed less
hydrocarbon. BALF treatment increased the amino
acid and phospholipid content of the PM2.6
surface.
ToF-SIMS - Inorganic: Saline washing appeared
to increase Al and Si but with extreme variability;
this increase was not statistically significant.
Both saline and BALF washing decreased NhU and
Na levels to a similar extent. BALF washing did
not affect Al or Si.
Reference: Kim et al. Zn2 +
(2005, 088454) Particle Size: NA
Species: Human
Cell Type/Line:
BEAS-2B
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 15, 50,
100/ymol
Time to Analysis: 1-20h
Cell Viability: At 50//M for 20h, no apoptosis
was induced.
IL-8: At 12h, IL-8 increased in dose-dependent
manner. At 15 or 50//M, Zn2 + increased protein
1.6 and 4.6 fold respectively. IL-8 mRNA
expression increased dose-dependently, reaching
statistical significance at 2 h and continuing until
4h.
EGFP (adenoviral IL-8 promoter): Levels
increased 2.4 fold with 50//M Zn2 + .
Proteases: With 50//M Zn2 +, phosphorylation of
MAPKs ERK, JNK and p38 increased by 15min
and continued increasing up to 2h. Pre exposure of
inhibitors of MEK, JNK, before Zn2 + exposure
caused inhibition of Zn-induced IL-8 mRNA and
protein production. Inhibitor of p38 had no effect.
Dephosphorylation of ERK and JNK was partially
inhibited with exposure to Zn2+.
July 2009 D-51 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Kleinman
et al. (2003, 087938)
Species: Rat
Strain: Wistar,
Fischer 344
Age: 22-24m, 10wks
Cell Type/Line: AMs
UF1: Utrecht 1 Fine (urban freeway)
UC1: Utrecht 1 Coarse
UF2: Utrecht 2 Fine (urban, freeway, light
industrial)
UC2: Utrecht 2 Coarse
SRM 1650
SRM 1648
Particle Size: UF1: 0.2-2.5 fjm; UC1: 2.5-10
/jm; UF2: 0.2-2.5/jm; UC2: 2.5-10/ym
Route: Cell Culture (10E cells/well
at 10e cells/mL)
Dose/Concentration: 1.2 to
1200 ng/106 cells
Time to Analysis: 4,18h
Macrophage PMA-stimulated respiratory
burst activity: SRM 1648 and 1650 induced
dose-dependent decreases approaching 0 at 50 -
100/yg|10E cells. Large dose-dependent decreases
from old rat AMs exposed to fine PM exposure
were followed by young rat AMs exposed to fine
PM. However, no age-related effects were
statistically significant.
Free radical production: All coarse particles
depressed free radical production in a semi-dose-
dependent manner, with UC2 exhibiting more
potency than UC1. Both fine particles also showed
dose-dependent responses but UF1 and UF2
responses were greater than the control at 3
/yg/10e cells.
PM Characterization: Ratios between coarse
and fine PM were similar for metals tested (Al, Fe,
Mn, Zn). Al was higher in coarse samples and Zn
higher in fine PM, although large variability was
observed. Fe and Mn results were roughly
equivalent for all samples.
Reference: Kocbach,
A.
Namork, E.
Schwarze, P.E.
2008
Species: Human
Cell Type/Line: THP-
1
PMW: Wood smoke particles
Collected from conventional Norwegian wood
stove burning birch
PMT+: Traffic-derived particles
Collected from road tunnel in winter when
studded tires were used
PMT-: Traffic-derived particles
Collected from road tunnel in summer without
studded tires
DEP: SRM2975
Porphyr: fine grain syenite porphyry (prepared
by SINTEF, Trondheim, Norway)
Polymyxin B Sulphate (endotoxin inhibitor)
Particle Size: PMW, PMT, DEP: NR; Porphyr
8 /jm (mean)
Route: Cell Culture (1,000,000
cellsfmL)
Dose/Concentration: 30-280
/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: 2, 5,12h
Particle Characterization: PMT + contained a
high mineral particle content. PMT- contained
carbon aggregates, organic carbon and polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH). PMW and DEP
contained carbon aggregates. PAH content of
PMW was greater than DEP. Porphyr was not
included in the analysis.
Cytokines: PMT± induced releases of TNF-a, IL-
1 (3, and IL-8 with 30 or 70/yglmL. PMW similarly
induced TNF-a and IL-8. DEP induced IL-1 p and
IL-8. Porphyr induced IL-8 increases. IL-4, IL-6 and
IL-10 were unaffected. Overall, the order of
effective cytokine induction from most to least
effective was PMT±, PMW, DEP, and Porphyr.
mRNA expression of TNF-a, IL-1 (3, IL-8, and IL-10
increased with 140 /yglmL of PMT ± and slightly
for PMW.
LDH: PMT ± induced small but statistically
significant increases at low doses. DEP increased
LDH at 280/yg/mL only.
Polymyxin B Sulphate: The endotoxin inhibitor
significantly inhibited LPS-induced cytokine
release by 80-90% and reduced PMT ± induction
by 50-60%.
Organic Extraction: PMT + washed and native
particles showed equivocal induction of cytokine
release. PMT + organic extract had no effect.
PMT- and PMW organic extracts significantly
increased TNF-a and IL-8. Washed particles
induced less signficant increases of IL-8. DEP
organic extract had no effect.
Reference: Kristovich CP: carbon particle (carbonaceous negative
R et al. (2004,
087963)
Species: Human
Cell Type/Line:
HUVEC, HPAEC,
HPMVEC, HPBMC
image of zeolite)
CFE: C/Fe particulate (synthesized)
CFE + : C-Fe/F-AI-Si particulate (synthesized)
CFA: Coal Fly Ash (Coal-fired power plant,
N0S)
DEP: (exhaust pipe of diesel powered truck)
CP, CFE, CFE+ approx 1 /jm (resembling
zeolite)
Particle Characterization (Surface chemistry):
CP - 88% C, 1% Si, 10% 0,1% N.
CFE -80% C, 2% Fe, 2% Si, 16% 0.
CFE+ - 20% C, 6% Al, 3% Si, 50% F, 6% 0,
11 % N, 4% Na. CFA - 25% C, 3% Fe, 13%
Al, 17% Si, 41% 0,1 % N. DEP - 70% C, 3%
Fe, 24% 0,1%N, 2% S.
Particle Size: CP, CFE, CFE+: approximately
1 /jm (resembling zeolite): CFA: < 2 fjm; DEP:
150nm
Route: Cell Culture (4x10E6
cells/well)
Dose/Concentration: CP: 5-50
/yg/cm2: CFE: 2.5-25/yglcm2;
CFE+: 2.5-25/yglcm2; CFA: 10-
100/yglcm2; DEP: 2.5-25/yglcm2
Time to Analysis: 4, 8, or 24h
Cytotoxicity: CP exhibited no effects. DEP and
CFE exhibited intermediate toxicities in the range
of 50-70/yglcm2. No toxicity was apparent when
treated with CFA (up to 200/yglcm ) or
synthesized C particulates.
Endothelial Activation: ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and E-
selectin were activated dose-dependently by DEP,
CFE, and CFE +. No effects observed for CFA or
CP. These effects were not the result of endotoxin
Individual Variability: Donors (humans) showed
variability in responses especially for CFA. 3/9 had
a medium response negated by ND responses in
6|9.
July 2009 D-52 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Kubatova, A.
Dronen, L.C.
Picklo, M.J.
2006
Species: Rat, Human
Cell Type/Line: RAW
264.7 (rat), BEAS-2B
(human)
PMW: Wood Smoke
Collected from airtight wood stove burning
hardwoods
¦P: Polar (fraction extracted from 25-50 C)
¦MP: Mid Polar (fraction extracted from 100-
150 C)
¦NP: Nonpolar (fraction extracted from 200-
300 C)
¦C: P + MP + NP
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture (RAW 264.7:
10e cells/mL; BEAS-2B: 106
cellsfmL)
Dose/Concentration: 50,100,
200 /yglmL
Time to Analysis: 12h
GSH: PMW-MP and PMW-NP induced GSH
depletion substantially in a dose dependent
manner starting at 50 //gfmL in both cell types.
DMS0 had no effect.
Cytotoxicity: PMW-MP and PMW-NP increased
cytotoxicity at 200/yglmL in RAW 264.7. BEAS-
2B was unaffected.
Particle Characterization: PMW-MP contained
higher concentrations of oxy-PAHs, disyringyls,
syringylguaiacyls and PAHs. oxy-PAHs include 9-
fluorenone, 1 -phenalenone, 9,10-anthraquinone
and hydroxycadalene. PAHs included
phenanthrene, fluoranthene and pyrene.
Effects of Individual Components of PMW-MP
on GSH: 1,8-dihydroxy-9-1 Oanthraquinone and
9,10-phenanthraquinone depleted GSH. 9,10-
anthraquione, anthrone, 1 -hydroxypyrene
increased GSH. Phenanthrene, 1-methylpyrene, 9-
fluorenone and xanthone had no effect.
Reference: Kubatova
et al. (2004, 087986)
Species: Monkey
Cell Type/Line:
African green monkey
kidney cells
designated COS-1
(CV-1 cells with origin
¦defective mutants of
SV40), E coli PQ 37
(SOS Chromotest)
DEP: Obtained from diesel bus
PMW: Wood smoke particulates obtained from
airtight wood stove burning hardwood
HSF: Hot pressure fractionation
¦C: P + MP + NP
¦P: Polar
¦MP: Mid Polar
¦NP: Nonpolar
OE: Organic Extraction
¦HNP: n hexane nonpolar
¦MEP: methanol polar
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture (10,000
cells/180 ul)
Dose/Concentration: 0, 50,100,
150, 200, 250, 300/yg|mL
Time to Analysis: Cytotoxicity:
24h; Chomotest: 2h SOS
Cytoxicity: PMW induced cytotoxicity in a dose-
dependent manner. PMW-HNP induced low
cytotoxicity, followed by PMW-C (intermediate)
and PMW-MEP (highest). Levels above 25/yg/mL
were cytotoxic. DEP-HNP induced cytotoxicity but
was not dose-dependent. Results similar for all 3
fractions (highly variable). All fractions with
concentrations higher than 100 //g/mL were
cytotoxic.
Extraction Water Temperature Effect: PMW
was cytotoxic at temperatures over 50 C. DEP
was cytotoxic at temperatures higher than 200n
C. At 250n, cytotoxicity between DEP and PMW
was similar. At 300n C, PMW cytotoxicity
declined and DEP stayed high, resulting in DEP
inducing higher cytotoxicity than PMW.
SOS Chromotest: fB-Galactosidase formation
increased, peaked at 200n C with DEP and
declined to control at 300n C. Individual fractions
showed linear dose response from 25-200 //gfmL
with 150n C and 200n C extracts significantly
higher.
Reference: Lee et al.
(2005,156682)
Species: Human
Cell Type/Line: A549
MEP: Motorcycle Exhaust Particles (Yamaha
Cabin engine, 95 octane unleaded
gasoline,150 rpm)
MEPE: MEP Particle Free
MEP 0.5//m
MEPE < 0.2//m
Particle Size: MEP 0.5um; MEPE < 0.2/jm
Route: Cell Culture (1x106
cells/well)
Dose/Concentration: MEP 0.02,
0.2, 0.2, 2, 20/yglmL; MEPE 20
/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: 24h
IL-8: MEP induced IL-8 at concentrations greater
than 0.2 /yglmL. Levels increased 2fold at 24 h
with 20 /ygfmL. MEPE induced similar responses
at 20/ygfmL. Induction of IL-8 mRNA expression
was dose-dependent with MEP and MEPE.
Cytotoxicity: Exposure to particles did not affect
cytotoxicity.
NFkB: MEP (20 //gfl) induced time-dependent
activation for 2h and continued at same level for
up to 6h. Pretreatment of PDTC (1 mM) fully
inhibited MEP induction.
MAP Kinase: MEP induced time-dependent
activation up to 30 min and stayed elevated for at
least 60 min.
ROI: MEP treatment induced a time-dependent
increase in ROI for up to 1 h and then continued
the at same level for up to 6h.
July 2009 D-53 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Lee, C.C.
Kang, J.J.
2002
Species: Mouse
Strain: Peritnoeal
Macrophages, RAW
264.7
Species: Rat
Strain: AMs
MEP Yamaha 2-stroke engine using unleaded
gas)
MEPE(particle-free MEP)
Particle Size: 0.5 /jm
Route: Cell Culture (5 X10!l
cells/mL (Cytotoxicity), 3 X106
cellsfmL (Apoptosis), 2 X106 cells
(MMP and ROD, 1 X107 cells
(GSH)
Dose/Concentraion: 5,10, 50,
100,300,1000/yglmL
Time to Analysis: 6,12,18, 24h
Cytotoxicity: Viability decreased dose and time-
dependently in all cell types at 24h.
Apoptosis: subG1 significantly and dose-
dependently increased at the 300 MEP //gfmL
dose in all cell types, indicating increased
apoptosis. MEPE induced similar results. Inhibition
was successful against MEP-induced apoptosis by
calcium chelators EGTA, BAPTA-AM, cyclosporin
A and antioxidants NAC, GSH, catalase and SOD.
Ca2+: MEP and MEPE increased Ca2+ at 300
/yglmL. BAPTA-AM completely inhibited induction.
ROI: MEP increased R0I in a time-dependent
manner. Calcium chelators and antioxidants
substantially attenuated induction.
GSH: MEP significantly decreased GSH.
MMP: Mitochondria membrane potential
decreased dose-dependently with MEP 100 /yglmL
and 300 //gfmL. Calcium chelators and
antioxidants partially inhibited reduction.
Reference: Li et al.
(2002, 042080)
Species: Mouse
Cell Line: RAW
264.7, THP-1
Species: Murine
Cell Line: RAW
264.7
VACES (Biosampler PMio in Downey, CA -DEP
concentrate in water)
DEPM (DEP methanol extract)
DEPME (DEP methylene chloride extracts)
DEPAL (DEPME aliphatic (hexane))
DEPAR (DEPME aromatic (hexane/methlene
chloride))
DEPP0 (DEPME polar (methylene
chloride/methanol))
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture (2 X10'!
cells/well Mouse RAW 264.7 and
THP-1; 0.67 X106 cells/well
Murine RAW 264.7)
Dose/Concentration: 10 - 200
/yg/mL
JNK Activation and IL-8
Production: THP-1 cells- 0,10, 25,
50,100/yg|mLDEPM; THP-1
cells- 0,10,25, 50,100 //g/mL of
DEP; RAW264.7 cells- 10-100
DEP/yg/mL
Cytotoxicity: 1,10, 25 (THP-1
cells only), 50,100, 200 /yglmL
GHS/GSSG: 0,10,25, 50,100
/yg/mL
H0-1 Expression: 0, 25, 50,100,
200 /yglmL
Time to Analysis: GHS/GSSG:
DEPM, whole DEP (RAW
264.7only) 8h.
H0-1, MnSOD Expression: RAW
264.7, THP-1 7h. RAW 264.7
cells exposed to whole DEP 16h.
JNK Activation, IL-8 Production:
THP-1 cells 30min, 16h. RAW
264.7 cells 90min.
Cytotoxicity: RAW264.7, THP-1
18h.
GSH/GSSG Ratio: DEPM induced dose-dependent
decrease in GSH/GSSG ratios in both cell lines.
DEP induced decreases at comparable doses to
DEPM.
HO-1 Expression: Cells exhibited dose-dependent
increases in H0-1 expression.
HO-1 Expression in Murine RAW 264.7:
VACES-F consistently induced H0-1 expression
over a 9m period, whereas VACES-C was effective
in inducing H0-1 during fall and winter. H0-1
induction positively correlated to higher 0C and
PAHs that were represented in VACES-F, but also
seen with a rise in PAHs in VACES-C during winter
months.
MnSOD: At doses of 2.5/yglmL, DEPM increased
MnSOD in THP-1 cells.
JNK Activation: DEPM dose-dependently
increased JNK phosphorylation but did so without
a change in the JNK expression level. DEP-exposed
mouse RAW264.7 cells exhibited similar increases
in JNK phosphorylation but without increasing
JNK expression.
IL-8: Exposure to DEPM elicited dose-dependent
increase in IL-8 levels of THP-1 cells.
July 2009
D-54
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Li et al.
(2002,087451)
Species: Human
Cell Line: BEAS-2B,
NHBE, THP-1
macrophages
Species: Murine
Cell Line: RAW
264.7, macrophages
DEPM (DEP methanol extract)
DEPME (DEP methylene chloride extracts)
DEPAL (DEPME aliphatic (hexane))
DEPAR (DEPME aromatic (hexane/methlene
chloride))
DEPPO (DEPME polar (methylene
chloridefmethanol))
Particle Size: 0.05-1 /ym
Route: Cell Culture (10I! cells/mL) ROS: BEAS-2B cells demonstrated increased HE
50,100 /yg/mL
Time to Analysis: 30, 60,
120min
fluorescence, indicating increased ROS formation.
THP-1 cells were unaffected.
GSH/GSSG Ratio: DEPM dose-dependently
decreased GSH/GSSG in THP-1 and BEAS-2B
cells. Similar changes occurred with NHBE cells.
THP-1 cells maintained a higher ratio of
GSH/GSSG than BEAS-2B and NHBE cells.
NAC on GSH/GSSG Ratio: Exposure to DEPM in
the presence of NAC did not affect the GSH/GSSG
ratio in BEAS-2B and NHBE cells. In THP-1 cells,
NAC prevented a decline in the GSH/GSSG ratio.
MnSOD and HO-1: THP-1, BEAS-2B and NHBE
cells showed constitutive MnSOD expression and
dose-dependent expression of HO-1 protein and
mRNA. No change occurred in the expression of fB-
actin.
DEPAL, DEPAR, DEPPO, CoPP on HO-1
Expression: DEPPO was more potent than
DEPAR. DEPAL lacked activity for THP-1 and
BEAS-2B cells. The potency of DEPPO was
sufficient to affect cellular viability and HO-1.
CoPP induction of HO-1 failed in THP-1 cells, but
succeeded in BEAS-2B cells. However, it did not
protect against the oxidizing effects of DEPM.
JNK: JNK activation increased in DEP-exposed
THP-1 and BEAS-2B cells.JIMK isoforms were
observed at doses of a 25 /yg/mL. In BEAS-2B
cells a high rate of cell death diminished this
response at 100/yg/mL. NHBE also showed
increased JNK phosphorylation at doses 50 -100
/yg/mL.
NAC on JNK: NAC led to inhibition of JNK
activation.
IL-8: THP-1 cells showed dose-dependent
increases of IL-8. NHBE cells showed incremental
increases followed by rapid decline at 100/yg/mL
attributed to apoptosis. BEAS-2B cells responded
to 10 /yg/mL with increased IL-8, but cellular
toxicity and cell death led to a drop in IL-8
production at higher doses.
Cytotoxicity: Comparing cytotoxicity at 25
/yg/mL DEP, BEAS-2B cells had a higher rate of
cell death than THP-1 cells. BEAS-2B cells showed
a significant rise in cell death at doses larger than
10/yg/mL. In THP-1 cells, it took doses of 25
/yg/mL or more before significant increases
occurred.
In BEAS-2B, cell death began at 2h. In THP-1,
increases in cell death prolonged for 8h or longer.
NHBE cells also showed increase rates of
cytotoxicity compared to macrophages. NAC in
THP-1 interfered with a generation of
cytotoxicity, but NAC did not have any decreasing
effect on cell death in BEAS-2B or NHBE cells.
July 2009
D-55
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Lindbom
et al. (2007,155934)
Species: Mouse
Cell Line/Type: RAW
264.7
PMio:
-ST: Street
¦S: Subway
¦G: Granite
¦Q: Quartzite
(-G and -~ generated by road simulator at
Swedish National Road and Transport
Research Institute)
Bimodal with peaks around 4-5um and 7-8um.
Particle Size: PMio
Route: Cell Culture (130000
cells/cm2)
Dose/Concentration: 1,10 or
100/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: 18, 24h
Analysis of Arachidonic Release
(AA):
Cells pre-incubated wf 1 uCI
Cellular Viability: Viability was not influenced by
any particle types and in all cases exhibited 90%
or higher viability, except for the combination of
subway particles and NAC where viability dropped
to 20%.
Cytokines: All particles induced TNF-a secretion
in a dose-dependent fashion. PM-S was most
potent at 1 /yglmL. PM-G and PM-ST induced
effects at 10/yg/mL. PM-Q induced increase of
tritium marked for AA and washed TNF-a at 100/yg/mL.PM-ST induced IL-6 release
exposed to 10, 50,100 and 250 at 10/yg/mL. PM-G, PM-Q, PM-S induced IL-6
//g/mL secretion at 100/yg/mL. DFX inhibited TNF-a in
cells exposed to PM-S and PM-ST. DFX induced
increase of TNF-a with PM-Q. For all PM types
(except PM-ST) DFX inhibited induced IL-6
secretion.
NO: PM-ST and PM-G induced a significant
release of NO, with PM-ST inducing a higher NO
release than PM-G.
NAC: NAC treatment significantly inhibited both
TNF-a and IL-6 secretion with all PM particles.
L-NAME: L-NAME caused a decrease in NO
secretion at 100 /yglmL of PM-ST. L-NAME did
not have an effect on granite-induced NO
secretion at 100/yg/mL.
Cytokine Gene Expression: TNF-a mRNA
showed a trend to increase for -ST, but this did
not reach significance. IL-6 gene expression
increased for PM-Q, PM-ST, PM-S but not for PM-
Q.
AA Release: PM-S exposure at 100 and 250
/yglmL was the only PM to induce AA release.
Lipid Peroxidation: All particle types induced
lipid peroxidation. PM-S and PM-ST induced
significantly higher lipid peroxidation as compared
to PM-Q and PM-G.
ROS: All particle types induced R0S formation.
PM-S and PM-ST induced significantly higher
formation at 10/yg/mL. PM-Q and PM-G induced
small but significant decreases in absorption at
100/yg/mL. Both PM-ST and PM-S had significant
dose responses for all concentrations tested. No
difference was observed between PM-G and PM-
Q. PM-S and PM-ST pretreated with DFX had a
lower ability to induce ROS formation.
Endotoxin Content: Only PM-ST showed positive
results for endotoxin content.
July 2009 D-56 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Liu et al.
(2005, 088304)
2005
Species: Human
Cell Type: HPAECs
SE: Wood Smoke Extract
(Generated using a stainless steel receptacle
containing 10Og of dry wood dust)
Particle Size: NA
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 40 //gfmL
Time to Analysis: 0-4h;
Mitochondrial Membrane
Destabilization: 0-60min; DNA
Defragmentation: 0-6h;
Cytotoxicity: 24h
Viability: SE exposure reduced cell viability dose-
dependently. Reduction reached —38% of
control.
Effect on Oxidative Stress/ Antioxidant
Enzymes: SE caused an increase in ROS levels, in
particular 02- and H202 in a time-dependent
manner. Exposure to SE for up to 4 h caused a
decrease in GSH levels in a time-dependent
manner. Increased expression of Cu/Zn SOD
mRNA and HO-1 mRNA was observed. Catalase or
GPx mRNA expression was unaffected.
Upregulation of Cu/Zn SOD and HO-1 occurred in a
time-dependent manner
Mitochondrial Translocation/ Capsase-
Independent Apoptosis/DNA fragmentation:
Exposure for up to 60 min caused an increase in
the percentage of annexin V-FITC-pos cells but not
Pl-pos cells. At 4h, FDA-pos cells was unaffected.
SE exposure caused a loss of mitochondrial
membrane potential (indicated by the change in
JC-1 fluorescence). Cytosolic bax levels increased
after exposure for 1 or 2h and returned to basal
level at 4 h after exposure. Levels of procaspase-3
and caspase-9 were unaltered by SE exposure
after 4h. Procaspase-3 increased and caspase-9
decreased by H202 exposure. SE exposure
increased levels of AIF and EndoG (exposure up to
4 h). At 6h, increased DNA defragmentation was
observed. Pre-treatment with caspase inhibitors
(CMK and Z-VAD-FMK) failed to suppress SE-
induced apoptosis.
NAC: Treatment with NAC prevented ROS
increase in cells exposed to SE for 60 min. NAC
addition prevented the reduction of GSH by SE.
NAC decreased nuclear levels of AIF and EndoG
and completely reduced DNA-fragmentation. NAC
alleviated the SE-induced reduced viability. GSH
and DNA fragmentation were unaffected by NAC.
Reference: Long et
al. (2005, 087454)
Species: Human
Cell Types: Human,
Peripheral blood
mononuclear cells
(PBMCs)
differentiated into
MDMs (90-95 %
CD14+) and T
lymphocytes
Synthetic C and C/Fe particles (phenol and
paraformaldehyde polymers on a zeolite
template)
C/Fe analysis Al 1.38 %, Si 0.33 %, Fe 0.46%
Particle Size: 1 //m
Route: Cell Culture (5 x 10e cells
(2 mL /well) MDMs
Dose/Concentration: 5 //gjcnr
Time to Analysis: 2-24h
ROSs release: Oxidative burst form C/Fe maxes
out at 20 min with no effect from C particles.
Cellular particulate actions: C particulates were
present within lysosomes with small clumps
forming after 24 h outside of lysosomes with no
evidence of organelle lysis and/or agglomeration.
C/Fe particulates showed similar initial effects
progressing at 24-h total organelle lysis extending
to the outer cell membrane.
T cell effects: No effects from C or C/Fe particles
Medium Effect: Particle agglomeration appears to
be a direct result of serum present within a
cellfree medium
Hydroxyl radical formation: C/Fe particles
showed an order of magnitude of higher hydroxyl
formation as compared to C particles
July 2009
D-57
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Ma et al.
(2004,088417)
Species: Mouse
Cell Line: JB6P +
(Epidermal Cell Line)
DEP: SRM 1975
Particle Size: 0.5 /jm
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: Non-
cytotoxic: 5,10, 20 /yglmL;
Cytotoxic: 0,10, 20, 40, 80,100,
160/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: 24,48h;
NF-kB and AP-1:12h
Phosphorylation of Akt: 5- 120
min.
Effect of LY294002 on DEP: Cells
pretreated with LY294002 (0 or
10//M) for 30 min and then
exposed to DEP for 0-60min.
Viability: Below 20/yglmL, DEP had no effect. At
concentrations greater than 20 /yglmL, DEP
caused apoptosis.
NF-kB and AP-1: DEP stimulated NF-kB activity
at 5 and 10 /yglmL. At 20 /yglmL, NF-kB activity
decreased, but was still greater than the control.
DEP had no effect on AP-1 activity.
P13K/Al
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Matsuo,
M.
Shimada, T.
Uenishi, R.
2003
Species: Human
Cell Type: NHBE,
NHPAE, TIG-1, TIG-7
(normal human lung
embryonic fibroblasts)
DEP: prepared at National Institute for
Environmental Studies (Tsukuba, Japan)
RDEP: residual DEP (after sequential
extraction with hexane (NOS), benzene,
dichloromethane, methanol, 1N ammonium
hydroxide)
Particle Size: 0.4//m (MMAD)
Route: Cell Culture (NHBE: 5x10"
cells/cm2; NHPAE: 3x103
cells/cm2; TIG-1 and TIG-7: 3x103
cells/cm2; Apoptosis: 2x106
cells/cm2; ROS/NO: 2x10"
cells/cm2; Cytoxicity Modulating
Agent: 3x10" cells/cm2; GSH:
3x10" cells/cm2)
Dose/Concentration: 25, 50,
100,200,300, 400, 500 //g/mL
Time to Analysis: 1h
Cytoxicity in NHBE: Both DEP and RDEP
exhibited dose-dependent cytotoxicity at
concentrations beginning from 50 //g/mL and
higher. RDEP was less cytotoxic than DEP. DEP
exposure resulted in necrosis, not apoptosis.
Comparative Cytotoxicity: The order of LCeo
values (50% lethal concentration) was: NHBE
(118//g/ml), NHPAE (137 //g/ml), TIG (270
//g/ml). NHBE's susceptibility was higher than the
susceptibility of NHPAE and TIG cells.
ROS/NO: DEP induced dose-
at 25 and 50 //g/mL.
Reduced Glutathione: DEP induced dose-
dependent decreases. At 200 or 300 //g/mL, GSH
levels decreased by 55.2 or 97.3%, respectively.
Antioxidant Effects: Various antioxidants either
decreased DEP cytotoxicity (PMC, Ebselen, EUK-8)
or had no effect on DEP cytotoxicity (SOD,
catalase, GSH, o-tocopherol)
Chelating Agents: DEP became less cytotoxic
when lon-chelating agents were preincubated for
24h. No effect on DEP cytotoxicity was observed
when chelating agents were administered to cells
immediately after sonication.
Endocytosis inhibitors: Decreased DEP toxicity
was observed in a dose-dependent manner.
Reference:
Matsuzaki, T.
Amakawa, K.
Yamaguchi, K.
2006
Species: Human
Cell Type: Peripheral
neutrophils
Gender: Male and
Female
Age: 20-40yrs
DEP: generated from a 4JB1 -type, 4 cyl Isuzu
diesel engine
me-DEP: methanol extract of DEP (40 % of
DEP by dry weight)
Particle Size: 0.4 //m
Route: Cell Suspensions (5 X106
cellsfmL)
Dose/Concentration: all me-DEP
f-actin: 1, 5,10//g/mL
CD11 b: 5,10, 30 //g/mL
IL-8: 5,10, 30 //g/mL
H202:5,10, 30, 60//g/mL
MMP-9, LTB-4: 5,10, 30, 60
//g/mL
Time to Analysis: f-Actin: 15min
CD11 b: 2h
IL-8: 2 or 24h
H202: 30min
MMP-9, LTB-4: 2 or 24h
F-Actin: Treatment with me-DEP showed a dose-
dependent increase in the f-actin content of
neutrophils and this increase was significantly
higher at 5 and 10//g/mL.
CD-11 b: Treatment increased CD-11 b expression
two-fold at 30 //g/mL.
IL-8: Minimal response was observed after 2h. A
significant increase was observed (243%) at 24 h
with 30//g/mL.
LTB-4: At 2h, LTB4 increased to 115% and 119%
with 30 and 60 //g/mL me-DEP respectively. At
24 h with 60 //g/mL me-DEP, LTB-4 increased
to153%.
H202: Exposure to 30 and 60//g/mL of me-DEP
induced large dose-dependent increases of 563%
and 1220%, respectively.
MMP-9: A significant increase at 2 and 24 h were
observed. In both exposure periods, 30 //g/mL
induced larger increases than 60 //g/mL.
Reference: Molinelli,
A.R.
Santacana, G.E.
Madden, M.C.
2006
Species: Human
Cell Type: NHBE,
BEAS-2b
(transformed
bronchoepithelial
cells)
PMH: PMio extracts in hexane
PMA - PMio extracts in acetone of residue
after hexane extraction
¦G: Guaynabo(Urban) and
¦F: Fajardo (Preservation Area),
PR, USA
1999
Particle Size: PMio
PMio extracts collected by Puerto Rico
Environmental Quality Board
Route: Cell Culture (3x103
cells/well)
Dose/Concentration: NHBE
exposed to 0-100//g/mL of PMio
BEAS-2B exposed to 10,100, 250
//g/mL of PMio
Time to Analysis: 48h
Metal analysis: Hexane extracts Cu, V, Ni all
higher in winter than summer. For hexane extracts
within the same season, metal concentrations
were higher in the Fajardo extracts. On the other
hand, the acetone extracts from Guaynabo
generally had higher metal concentrations than
Fajardo.
Cytotoxicity NHBE: The order of most to least
toxic for PM extracted with hexane is: winter-
G, winter-F, summer -G , summer-F. The order of
most to least toxic for PM extracted with acetone
is: summer-G, summer-F, winter-g.
Cytotoxicity BEAS-2: For PM extracted with
hexane, the cytotoxicity order is: winter-G, winter-
F, summer-G, summer-F. The order for acetone
extracted PM is: summer-G , summer-F, winter-F,
winter-G. Effects trend similar to metal levels (no
analysis). Summer extracts showed linear dose-
response curves. Winter extracts exhibited more
equivocal results, especially for Fajardo. Results
suggest that NHBE cells are more sensitive than
the BEAS-2B cells to PM extracts.
July 2009
D-59
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Moller et
al. (2002, 036589)
Species: Canine,
Mouse
Cell Type:
Dog Alveolar
Macrophages (BD-
AM), J774A.1 (from
cell line BALB/c/NIH)
fTi02 (origin NR)
ufTi02 (origin NR)
ufP-G: carbon black (Printex-G, Degussa,
Frankfurt, Germany)
ufP90: carbon black (Printex90, Degussa,
Frankfurt, Germany)
ufEC90: elemental carbon (produced by
electrical spark generator under standardized
conditions with low impurities)
DEP (SRM 1650)
UrbD: Urban Dust (SRM 1649a)
Particle Size: (in diameter) Ti02: 220nm;
ufTi02: 20nm; ufP-G: 51 nm; ufP90:12nm;
ufEC90: 90nm; DEP: 120nm; UrbD: NR
Route: Cell Suspension
Dose/Concentration: 10, 32,
100, 320/yg|mL
Time to Analysis: 24h
Cytoskeleton of J774A.1: At doses of 32//gfmL
or less, the particles did not significantly influence
relaxation and stiffness. fTi02and ufP90 had no
effect at any dose. ufTi02 at 320 /yglmL induced
retarded relaxation and significant stiffening.
ufEC90 induced dose-dependent retardation of
relaxation and increased stiffening. DEP and UrbD
induced similar results.
Cytoskeleton of BD-AM: ufTi02 and fTi02 both
induced some retarded relaxation and increased
stiffening at 100 /yglmL dose. ufTi02 appears to
increase stiffening in a dose-dependent manner.
ufEC90 induced dose-dependent acceleration of
relaxation due to the carbon content of ufEC90.
DEP also induced acceleration of relaxation as
well as a decrease in stiffness.
Phagocytosis: At 24 h, ufTi02 and fTi02
significantly reduced phagocytotic ability in
J774A.1 but not in BD-AM. All carbonaceous
particles induced significant impairment in
J774A.1. All ultrafine carbon particles inhibited
BD-AMs.
Cell Proliferation: ufTi02 significantly inhibited
proliferation compared to the control and fTi02 at
100/yglmL in J774A.1. ufEC90 and ufP90
inhibited proliferation slightly with ufEC90
inducing slightly greater inhibition than ufP90.
UrbD and DEP also significantly reduced
proliferating.
Apoptosis: All particles induced decreased
viability at 100 //gfmL in both cell types. With
ufTi02 inducing greater apootosis than fTi02,
ufEC90 than ufP90 and ufEC90 than ufP-G.
Reference: Mutlu GM
et al. (2006,155994)
Species: Human, Rat
Cell Type: A549,
Primary Alveolar Type
II Epithelial Cells
PMio
(Collected by baghouse from ambient air in
Dusseldorf, Germany) Particle Size: PMio
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 0.05, 0.5,
5. 50/yg/cm2
Time to Analysis: 24h
Na.K-ATPase Plasma Membrane Protein: PMio
induced a decrease of protein in the plasma
membrane of A549 cells. Total Na.K-ATPase
levels were unaffected.
ROS: Pretreatment with EUK-134, superoxide
dismutase and catalase mimetic, inhibited the
decrease of GSH. Furthermore, it attenuated the
decrease of NA.K ATPase in A549 cells.
I\IA, K-ATPase Activity: PMio induced a dose-
dependent decrease in ouabain-sensitive liberation
of 32P from AT32P in primary rat alveolar type II
cells. This effect was inhibited with pretreatment
with EUK-134.
Reference: Nam,
HR.Y.
Choi, B.HR.
Lee, J.Y.
2004
Species: Human
Cell Type: A549
PM2.6
Collected from hospital rooftop, Seoul, South
Korea
Particle Size: PM2.B
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 0.5,1,10,
25, 50 /yglcm2
Time to Analysis: 6, 24h
NFkB/IkBo: 50/yglcm2 DEP induced iKBa
degradation which peaked at 2h and recovered
after 4h. Treatment with increasing amount of
PM2.6 resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in
IKBa. PM2.E increased NFkB in a dose-dependent
manner up to 10 //g/cm2. NFkB induction peaked
at 12h.
IL-8: PM2.6 treatment increased protein level more
than 3 fold with 100/yglcm2 PM2.6. mRNA levels
also increased.
iNOS Inhibitor: PM2.6 induced IL-8 elevation was
completely blocked by iNOS inhibitor. iNOS
inhibitor also negated PM2.6 induction of NFkB
activity. Antioxidants and iNOS inhibitor reduced
PM-induced IkBq degradation.
Reference: Nozaki Jl
et al. (2007, 097862)
Species: Mouse
Cell Line: LA-4
(Alveolar Epithelial
Cells)
PM: PM Rooftop 5story, urban, Japan
PME: dichloromethane extract of PM filtered
P90: Printex 90 (carbon black) (Degussa)
Particle Size: PM: 0.22 /jm; PME: 2.5 /jm;
P90: 14nm
Route: Cell Culture (1.4x 104
cells/cm2)
Dose/Concentration: 1.1 //gfcm2
Time to Analysis: 24, 28, 72h
Cytotoxicity: P90 had no effect. PM and PME
were cytotoxic at similar levels.
Protein Expression: All particles affected protein
expression (no specific protein- 2D gel
electrophoresis).
July 2009 D-60 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Obot et
al. (2002, 042370)
Species: Mouse
Cell Line: BALB/c
Cell Type: AMs
PM: SRM 1648
PM-100: PM heated to 100 C
PM-500: PM heated to 500 C
PM-PH: PM acid digestion
PMAC: Acetone extraction
PMCH: Cyclohexane extraction
PMH20: Water extraction
All extract fraction used as residual particles
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture (5 X10!l
cells.i'niL)
Dose/Concentration: PM: 200
//g/mL; PM-100: 188//g/mL; PM-
500: 130 mg/l; PM-PH: 94//g/mL;
PMAC: 173//g/mL; PMCH: 171
//g/mL; PMH20: 188 //g/mL
Fraction doses adjusted for mass
loss during fraction treatment
Time to Analysis: 4h
Cytotoxicity: All 7 fractions had cytotoxic
effects. PM had highest cytotoxicity. PM-500,
PM-PH, PMAC less toxic than PM.
Apoptosis: All 7 fractions significantly increased
apoptosis. The PM fractions that induced the
greatest apoptosis in descending order are: PM,
PMH20, PM-100, PM-500, PMAC, PMCH and
PM-PH. PM-induced apoptosis (only PM, PM-500
and PMAC tested) was blocked by poly I or 2F8
antibody (scavenger receptors).
Particle Characterization: Untreated PM and
PM-100 did not have measurable amounts of
transition metals on its surface. Measured
components include carbon, 02, N, S, Si, Ca, A I, P,
CI. PM-PH mostly contained 02 and Si. PM-500
had increased 02, Si compared to PM and
measurable amounts of Na, K„ Zn, Co, Pb, Fe.
Included increased surface density of S, P, Al.
PMCH lacked nonpolar organic compounds.
Reference: Obot et
al. (2004, 095938)
Species: Mouse (7-
9wks), Human
Cell Line: Mouse-
BALB/c
Cell Type: AMs
PM: SRM 1648 (collected by bag-hosue in St.
Louis, M0).
PM-100: PM heated to 100n C
PM-500: PM heated to 500n C
PM-PH: PM acid digestion
PMAC: Acetone extraction
PMCH: Cyclohexane extraction
PMH20: Water extraction
All of the 6 extract fractions from PM1648
PM2.6: Collected in Houston, TX
Particle Size: PM1648: NR; PMz.b
Route: Cell Culture (5 X10E
cellsi'niL)
Dose/Concentration: PM: 200
//g/mL; PM-100: 188//g/mL; PM-
500: 130 mg/l: PM-PH: 94//g/mL;
PMAC: 173//g/mL; PMCH: 171
//g/mL; PMH20: 188//g/mL
Fraction doses adjusted for mass
loss during fraction treatment
PM2.6 - 50,100,150, 200 //g/mL
Time to Analysis: Mouse-4h;
Human-24h.
Human AM Viability: Only PM, PM-100, PMAC
and PMH20 decreased viability.
Human AM Apoptosis: PM, PM-100 and PMH20
increased apoptosis. PM induced greater apoptosis
than PM-100 and PMH20.
Regression Analysis Mouse vs Human:
Although individual fractions differed somewhat,
cell viability and apoptosis of all 7 fractions
showed linear regression
Human and Mouse AM Viability with PM2.5:
Nearly identical dose-dependent decrease was
exhibited starting at 50 //g/mL
Human and Mouse AM Apoptosis with PM2.5:
Nearly identical dose-dependent increases were
exhibited with human AM responses peaking at
150 //g ;inL and declining at 200 //g/mL (no mouse
data for 200//g/mL).
Regression Analysis with PM2.5: Excellent
correlation of mouse and human responses for
viability and apoptosis was exhibited.
Reference: Okeson et CG: Coal ash, Germany
al. (2003, 042292)
Species: Rat
Cell Type: RLE-6TN
(Type II Alveolar
Epithelial Cells)
CU: Coal ash, USA
5C: PM # 5 Oil fly ash coarse
5F: PM #5 Oil fly ash fine
6MSC: PM #6 Oil med sulfur fly ash coarse
6HSC: PM # 6 Oil high sulfur fly ash coarse
6HSF: PM # 6 Oil high sulfur fly ash fine
Particle Size: CG, CU: NR; 5C, 6MSC, 6HSC
> 2.5 //m; 5F, 6HSF < 2.5 //m
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: Coal Fly
Ash 12.5, 25,50,125, 250
//g/mL
Oil Fly Ash ¦ 100//g/mL
Time to Analysis: 24h
Oil PM Characterization: Generally, the fine
fractions had higher metal levels than the coarse
fractions except for Zn. High sulfur had a higher
metal content than med sulfur. Carbon percent
weight was stable across all 5 fractions.
Coal Ash Cytotoxicity: CG treatment exhibited
similar cytototoxic results as CU. Cytotoxic
effects were exhibited at concentrations of 12.5
//g/mL and above. Effects remained steady at
concentrations above 50 //g/mL.
Oil Ash Cytotoxicity: Cytotoxic effects were
induced by all. The order of PM fractions inducing
the most cytotoxicity to the least is the following:
5F, 6HSF, 6HSC, 5C, 6MSC.
Correlation of Metal Content and
Cytotoxicity: Fe, V showed a reasonable
correlation. Zn had no correlation.
Cell Metabolism: An inhibitory effect was
observed with 100 //g/mL coal ash after 6h. After
12h of exposure, CU, unlike CG, does not continue
to inhibit cell metabolism. Oil ash was generally
less effective than coal ash. The order of PM
fractions inhibiting metabolism the most to the
least is the following: 5F, 6HSC, 5C, 6MSC. 6HSF
not tested.
July 2009 D-61 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Okeson et
al. (2004, 087961)
Species: Rat
Cell Type: RLE-6TN
(Type II Alveolar
Epithelial Cells)
Zn, V, Fe chloride as salts (valence state not
reported i.e., Fe II or Fe III)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture (50000
cells/well)
Dose/Concentration: 0.001,
0.01,0.1,1.0,10 mM
Time to Analysis: 24h
Cytotoxicity: All metals cytotoxic at
concentrations greater than 0.1 mM. V is 5 times
less cytotoxic than Zn, and Fe is 7 times less
cytotoxic than Zn with a ECbo of 3mM and 4mM,
respectively. At 10 mM of each metal, no
surviving cells were present.
NCS: Incubation with NCS (5 or 10 %) decreased
toxicity of Zn, especially at 0.1 mM, but had no
effect on Fe or V toxicity.
Albumin: BSA decreased Zn toxicity at equivalent
concentrations but to a lesser extent than NCS.
Reference: Osornio-
Vargas et al. (2003,
052417)
Species: Mouse
Cell Line/Type:
J774A.1, L929
(Mesenchymal Cells)
PMio
PM2.6
¦N - Northern (industrial)
¦SE - Southeastern (lake basin dust) sites,
both heavy vehicular traffic, Mexico City,
Mexico
Particle Size: PM10; PM2.6
Route: Cell Culture (J774A.1:
15000 cells/cm2; L929: 30,000
cells/well)
Dose/Concentration: 20, 40, 80
/yg/cm2
Time to Analysis: 24-72h
PM Characterization: Elements similar in particle
types with elements in PM10 more abundant.
Northern particles contained more Co, Zn, Ni, Pb.
Endotoxin: All PM samples had detectable
amounts of endotoxin. PM2.6 -N had 22 EU/mg.
PMio-N had 30 EU/mg. PM2.6 -SE had 12 EU/mg.
PM10-SE had 59 EU/mg.
Cytotoxicity (J774A.1): The two northern
samples, PM2.6 and PM10, both induced similar
cytotoxic effects at 40% survival. PMio-SE and
PM2.6 SE induced dose-dependent responses. In
general, the northern samples had a higher
cytotoxic effect than the southern samples.
Apoptosis (J774A.1): Northern samples induced
more apoptosis than did the southeastern samples.
There was no difference between PM10 and PM2.6
induced apoptosis.
TNF-a and IL-6 (J774A.1): TNF-a and IL-6
induced dose-dependent increases. At 80 /yg/cm2,
PM in -SE induced the most production of IL-6
followed by PM2.6 -SE, PMio-N , and PM2.6 -N.
J774A.1 Supernatant Toxicity (L929):
Conditioned medium from J774A.1 pre-exposed to
each PM type reduced cell viability in L929 cells.
This was correlated with TNF-a level in
supernatants.
Reference: Pei,
X.HR. Nakanishi, Y.
Inoue, HR. 2002
Species: Human
Cell Type: A549
B[a]P
1-NP: 1 -nitropyrene
Both purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co.,
Ml, USA.
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: B[a]P:
10//M; 1-NP: 5/ymol
Time to Analysis: 4, 8, or 24h
IL-8: IL-8 mRNA increased by B[a]P and 1-NP in a
time-dependent manner with 1-NP increasing
higher levels than B[a]P at half the molarity.
NK-I10um
BDS-W: solvent washed
Graphite
Composition:
< 2.5um - 92%
2.5- 10um - 5%
>10um - 3%
Particle Size: BDS-P1: < 2.5/jm; BDS-P2:
2.5-10//m; BDS-P3: >10//m
Route: Cell Culture (1 -1.5x106
cells)
Dose/Concentration: 3mg BDS
Time to Analysis: 5min-72h
Particle Characterization: By weight, elemental
carbon makes up 94% of BDS, hydrogen 2%,
nitrogen and sulfur 1%, and oxygen less than
0.1%.
PAH Components of BDS: 13 prominent PAHs:
acenaphthylene, fluorene, anthracene,
cyclopentaphenanthrene, fluoranthene,
acephenanthrylene, pyrene, benzofluorenes,
acepyrene, chrysene, benzopyrenes, perylene,
benzoperylene.
BDS Activity: At 60-120min, BDS was observed
in the cells. At 4h, fluorescence observed in
cytoplasmic vesicles and increased during the first
24 h then plateaued for the next 72h. BDS-W
appeared in vesicles sooner than BDS.
July 2009 D-62 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Pozzi et al. (2005,
088610)
Species: Mouse
Cell Type: RAW
264.7
PM: Collected continuously for 15 days, 8-
10m from street, Sept 1999, Rome, Italy
¦F - Fine particulate
¦C - Coarse particulate
CB (Degussa Huber NG90)
Particle Size: PM-F: 0.4-2.5 fjm; PM C: 2.5-
10 /jm; CB: 200-250nm
Route: Cell Culture (1.3x10E
cells/well)
Dose/Concentration: 30 //gfmL;
14/yg/cm2
120/yg/mL; 54/yg/cm2
Time to Analysis: 5, 24h
Cytotoxicity: For 24h, lower levels of PM-F, PM-
C, and CB had no effect on cell viability. Higher
levels of PM C and CB induced a significant
release of LDH.
Arachidonic Acid (AA): Both fractions of PM
increased AA release in a dose-dependent manner
at 5h. CB increased a release only at the higher
concentrations although, in terms of magnitude,
the CB-induced release was much less than the
ambient PM-induced release. Pretreatment with
deferoxamine was not effective in decreasing AA
release.
TNF-a: TNF-a levels increased significantly for
both concentrations and time periods for PM. PM-
C at 24 h was significantly lower than at 5h for
both concentrations. PM-C at 30//gfmL induced a
much greater TNF-a release than PM-F at 5h.
IL-6: PM-F significantly increased at 5h for both
concentrations. Elevated IL-6 levels were exhibited
at both PM-C doses at 24 h. At 5h, only the high
dose elevated IL-6 levels. CB was devoid of an
effect on IL-6. LPS-induced IL-6 response was
similar to coarse PM at the high dose, with the
response being greater at 24 h than at 5h.
Reference: Prophete Ambient PM2.6
et al. (2006,156888) NYC. st and 26 Stj NYc
Species: Rat
Cell Type: NR8383
AMs
LA: San Gabriel foothills, Claremont, CA
SEA: 15th Ave S and S.Charleston, Seattle,
WA
V, Mn, Al, Fe levels in PM
added metals to cells
V: Na3V04
Al: AICb.6H20
Mn: MnCl2.4H20
Fe: FeCh.6H20
Particle Size: PM2.6
Route: Cell Culture (2 X10!l
cells.i'niL)
Dose/Concentration: Fe(lll) 16
/ymol
V, Mn, and Fe(lll) mixtures with V
or Mn in molar ratios 0.02, 0.08,
0.2 and 0.4 X Fe(lll)
Al and Fe(lll) mixtures with Al in
molar ratios 0.37, 0.75, 2, 7.5 X
Fe(lll)
Time to Analysis: 20h
Particle Characterization: Fe and metal to F
ratios based on ratios observed in PM2.6 from LA,
SEA and NYC sites. V: Fe ratios remarkably similar
among sites. Fe levels fixed at NYC level of 16/ym
(highest).
IRP: Coexposure with 3 metals increased IRP
binding activity relative to Fe III alone, by up to
3.5 fold for Al (1.5-3 ratio), 2 fold for Mn (0.08-
0.2 ratio) and 7 fold for V (0.2 ratio). IRP activity
dropped at higher ratios. A drop in IRP activity at
higher ratios may be result of cytotoxicity for Al,
but not for V and Mn.
iNOS: Al induced iNOS expression dose-
dependently. There was no observed effect for Mn
and V.
Induction of Hypoxia-inducible Factor (HIF-
1a): Only V and Al induced HIF-1a.
Activation of ERK1 and -2: V and Al induced
pERK1, but only V induced pERK2. Mn had no
increasing effects, but data indicated a decreasing
induction.
Reference: Ramage
and Guy (2004,
055640)
Species: Human
Cell Type: A549
PM10: Collected in Wolverhampton, UK
ufCB: Ultrafine Carbon Particles
(Origin not reported)
Particle Size: PM10, ufCB: < 100 nm
(diameter)
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 80//gfmL
Time to Analysis: 0, 0.5, 3, 6,
18h
CRP: Treatment with ufCB or PM10 produced an
increase in CRP expression with similar effects
noted after 6h. PM10 induced greater increases
than ufCB. Both the cytoplasm and nucleus
contained CRP.
Hsp70: PM 11 and ufCB induced increased levels at
all time points with ufCB inducing greater levels
than PM10. Hsp70 expression was observed in the
cytoplasm and nucleus.
Antioxidants of CRP and Hsp70: Coincubation
of ufCB with Nacystelin and Trolox caused a small
reduction in CRP and Hsp 70.
Reference: Rao et al.
(2005, 095756)
Species: Rat
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Cell Type: AMs and
cultured lung
fibroblasts
DEP: SRM 2975 (NIST)
Particle Size: 0.5/ym
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 200//gfmL
Time to Analysis: Measured
after 4h incubation.
mRNA Expression: No change in IL-1 (3 or iNOS
were observed. Data suggests that the lung
fibroblasts is the main source of IL-6 and MCP-1 in
BAL fluid because of their comparatively high
message levels. Due to the extreme variability in
results, the cause of an increase on co-culture
with AMs and/or DEPs was not assessed.
July 2009
D-63
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Reibman
et al. (2003,156905)
Species: Human
Cell Type: HBEC,
BEAS-2B
UFPM: Ultrafine PM
FPM: Fine PM
IPM: Intermediate PM
CPM: Coarse PM
CB: Carbon black
All PM collected 8th floor, 26th St and 1st
Ave, New York City, NY
Particle Size: UFPM: <0.18 fjm; FPM: 0.18
¦ 1.0/jm; IPM: 1.0 ¦ 3.2/jm; CPM: > 3.2/jm
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 11 //gfcnr;
100/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: 6,18h
Cytotoxicity: After treatment, cells were more
than 90% viable. UFPM and FPM caused no gross
alterations in cell morphology or adhesion.
MIP3a/CCL20 mRNA (6h): Stimulation of mRNA
released by HBEC upon exposure to UFPM
appeared similar to that provided by TNF-a (5
/yg/mL) and IL-1 p (10 mg/mL).
MIP30/CCL2O protein in HBEC |18h): TNF a
and IL-1 (3 induced a dose-dependent increase in
MIP3a/CCL20 protein (0-10 ng/mL), whereas II-4
and IL-13 induced MIP3afCCL20 protein release
that reached maximum levels at 1 ngfmL. No
release of MIP1 a/CCL3 nor RANTES/CCL-5 was
observed upon stimulation with cytokines.
Secretion of MIP3a/CCL20 in response to PM
(18h): All PM fractions less than 2.5 /jm resulted
in the release of MIP3afCCL20 protein in HBEC
roughly equivalent amounts. CB similar in size to
UF/fine PM did not result in the release of
MIP3a/CCL20, nor did LPS (0.01-1.0//gfmL). No
release of MIP1 a/CCL3 nor RANTES/CCL 5 was
observed upon stimulation by PM fractions.
Activation of MAPK (ERK1/2 and p38): ERK1/2
and p38 was activated by TNF-a, IL-1 (3, IL-4 and
IL-13 within 15 min and was sustained for at least
60 min. Erk1f2 and p38 inhibitors reduced
MIP3a/CCL20 release in BEAS-2B cells in
response to cytokines.
Reference: Riley et
al. (2003, 053237)
Species: Rat
Cell Type: RLE-6TN
(Type II Alveolar
Epithelial Cells)
Metabolism Inhibition Time Course Response
(Cu and Zn only): At high (1 mM] concentrations,
Zn toxicity peaked at 36-48h followed by a 2-fold
recovery by 72h. Cu showed a faster, steady
decline plateauing after 36h. At low
concentrations (0.1 mM), Cu showed a steady
slow decline. At 48h, Zn decreased faster to max
activity and returned to control by 72h.
IL-6 Secretion: Zn and Cu both decreased IL-6
secretion. Decreases were very similar for both
metals and concentrations when expressed as
secretion per viable cell ratio except for Zn at 1.0
mM.
Metal Combinations: Zn and Cu gave variable
results. Zn protected against V cytotoxicity. Zn
and Cu had an additive response. Zn did not affect
Fe toxicity.
Zn: ZnCI2
Cu: CuCI2
Fe: FeCI2
V: VCI4
Ni: NiCI2
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 0.01, 0.1,
1.0,10 mM
Time to Analysis: 2, 4, 24, 72h
Cytotoxicity (SDH): All particles were cytotoxic
in a dose-dependent manner. Zn and V were
cytotoxic at 0.05 mM, Cu at 0.5mM, Ni at 0.8mM
and Fe at 2 mM. For Zn, cell death (LDH) had a
biphasic response: a slow logslope until approx
0.1 mM at which point it rapidly accelerated to a
peak at 5mM with a small decline at 10mM. Most
of Zn cytotoxicity was not due to apoptosis. LPS
did not affect either Zn or Cu cytotoxicity.
July 2009
D-64
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Riley et
al. (2005, 096452)
Species: Rat, Human
Cell Type: RLE-6TN,
NR8383 Alveolar
Macrophages, A549
Fe: FeCI2
Ni: NiCI2
Cu: CuC12
V: VCI2
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture (5 x104
cells/well Alveolar Cells; 1.2x10E
cells/well NR8383)
Dose/Concentration: AMs: 0.02,
0.05, 0.07, 0.08 mM;
RLE-6TN: 0.1,0.2, 0.6,1.0,6.0
mM;
A549: 0.5, 0.8, 4.4, 4.8 mM
Time to Analysis: 2-48h
Relative Sensitivity of Cell Strains to Metal
Chloride: NR8383 was more sensitive than RLE-
6TN and A549 except for V where
NR8383 and RLE-6TN were both more sensitive
than A549.
Relative sensitivity of Cell Strains to Metal
Chloride vs Sulfate: With the exception of Cr,
sulfate was generally more cytotoxic than chloride
(note V valence state).
A549 Cytotoxicity Time Course: Zn cytotoxicity
takes 24 h to develop whereas Cu cytotoxicity
develops within 2 h. LDH release for Cu, however,
develops in 24h.
RLE Cytotoxicity Time Course: Zn starts at 2 h
and develops until 24 h. Cu develops within 2 h
and continues until 24 h where it is less toxic than
Zn. Both release equivalent amounts of LDH after
24 h.
NR8383 Cytotoxicity Time Course: Both Zn and
Cu exhibit time dependent toxicity beginning as
early as 4h. LDH release maximizes at 12 h and
either remains steady or declines.
Reference: Ritz, S.A.
Wan, J.
Diaz-Sanchez, D.
2007
Species: Human
Cell Type: BEAS-2B,
NHBEC
DX: Extract of DEP (generated from a light
duty four-cylinder diesel engine 4JB1 type
Isuzu Automobile)
Particle Size: < 1//m (diameter)
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 0, 20, 50,
100/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: 24h
NQ01 (Sentinel Phase II Enzyme): Cells
transfected with NQ01 reduced induction of IL-8
by DX exposure.
Sulfurophane: Increased gene expression of
phase II enzymes, particularly NQ01, was
observed in both cell types. Gene expression in
BEAS-2B was greater than that of NHBEC.
Sulfurophane did not upregulate GSTM1 in BEAS-
2B but induced a 2-fold increase in NHBEC.
Pretreatment also inhibited DX-induction of IL-8 in
both cell types.
Cytokines: DX induced significant increase of IL-8
in both cell types at concentrations of 10 //gf'niL
or higher. GM-CSF and IL-8 remained unaffected in
BEAS-2B. GM-CSF and IL-8 Increased in NHBECs
and reached statistical significance at 25 //g/mL.
Reference: Rosas
Perez et al. (2007,
097967)
Species: Mouse
Cell Type: J774A.1
PMio
Collected in Mexico City, Mexico from
January-June, 2002
North: Iztacala, manufacturing industry;
Center: Merced, heavy traffic;
South: Ciudad Universitaria, residential
Principal Component Analysis of Air Pollution
Data:
Group 1:S/K/Ca/Ti/Mn/Fe/Zn/Pb (43% of
variance);
Group 2: Cl/Cr/Ni/Cu (16%);
Group 3: Endotoxins/OC/EC (14%).
For all 3 sites: Averages of Group 1 is
statistically different among the center, north
and south sites with the central site producing
the highest values. Group 2 is similar among
the sites and, for Group 3, the north had a
lower average than the center and south sites.
Particle Size: PMio
Route: Cell Culture (1.5x104
cells/cm2)
Dose/Concentration: 20, 40 or
80/yg/cm2
Time to Analysis: 72h
Cytotoxicity: Responses were dose-dependent;
there was no observed site interaction.
Cytotoxicity seems to be a result of of the
following components: S/K/Ca/Ti/Mn/Fe/Zn/Pb.
IL-6: Only the center site at 40 //gfcm2 induced an
increase. Induction of higher IL-6 levels seems to
be related to high values of S/K/Ca/Ti/Mn/Fe/Zn/Pb
and endotoxins/OC/EC.
TNF- a: Production was induced by all samples in
a dose-dependent manner. Similar to IL-6,
induction of higherTNF-a levels seems to be a
result of high values of S/K/Ca/Ti/Mn/Fe/Zn/Pb and
endotoxins/OC/EC.
p53: Only south PM had effect. Induction of p54
seems to depend on high levels of Cl/Cr/Ni/Cu and
low levels of S/K/Ca/Ti/Mn/Fe/Zn/Pb.
July 2009
D-65
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Sakamoto et al.
(2007, 096282)
Species: Human
Age: 58-82y
(Smokers)
Cell Type: HBEC
PMio: EHC-93 (Obtained from Health Canada,
Canata)
Particle Size: PMio
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 100, 300
and 500 /yglmL
Time to Analysis: Calcium
responses: up to 60min; cytokines:
6 or 24h
Intracellular [Ca2+]: [Ca] concentration slowly
increased, elevating after 10 and 30 min for 500
and 300 mg/mL, respectively. The response
plateaued at 35 min for 500 //gfmL.
Extracellular [Ca2*]: Starting at 20 min, the
removal of extracellular Ca decreased the PMio
response significantly. Calcium channel blocker
(10//M or 1mM) LaCI3 and (5mM) NiCI2
significantly blocked the PM-induced intracellular
Ca. Lacl2 administration (1 mM] inhibited the PM-
induced Ca2+ response in a dose-dependent
manner.
Mode of Action: Intracellular Ca induced by ATP
declined more slowly in the cells exposed by PMio.
This indicates that PMio blocks Ca clearance via
the calcium pumps.
Cytokines: PMio induced a dose-dependent
increase in cytokine mRNA levels and cytokines IL-
1 p, LIF, IL-8 and GM-CSF. Cytokine expression
was unaffected by the reduction of extracellular
Ca2+. Preincubation with the calcium chelator
reduced responses for IL-1 (3 and IL-8 but not LIF
or GM-CSF.
Reference: Salnikow
et al. (2004, 087469)
Species: Human
Cell Line: 1HAEo-
FeSOi
FeCIs
N i S 0i
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 0.25mM
Fe exposures also contained 60
/yg/mL apotransferrin
Time to Analysis: 24h
Cytotoxicity: Both Fe had no effect. NiCL2
caused marginal cytotoxicity (75%).
Hypoxic Stress: At 20h, NiSOi (at
concentrations of 0.25 or 0.5mM) induced NDRG-
1fCap43 protein production indicating hypoxic
stress. DFX and DMOG induced a similar effect.
IL-8: NiS04 induced IL-8 time-dependently for up
to 48h. At 48h, the increase was 6 + fold.
Coexposure (Ni + Fe) on Fe uptake: Fe III
uptake was greater than Fe II uptake. NiS04 had
no effect. Ni uptake was greater than Fe uptake
but was decreased by coexposure to Fe.
Coexposure also did not effect hypoxic stress.
Coexposure with Fe did reduce Ni-induced IL-8
production.
Reference: Salonen
et al. 2004 (2004,
187053)
Species: Mouse
Cell Type: RAW
264.7
PMio (urban traffic) Finland
(filter sonicated in water and methanol,
extracted with methanol)
Pooled as winter (W) spring I (SI) or spring II
(Sll) based on componentftime considerations
HVLI slit impactor
Particle Size: PMio: 0.12-10nm
Route: (2x106 cells/well)
Dose/Concentration: 15,50,
150,500,1000/yglmL
Time to Analysis: 0, 24h
Air quality parameters: Winter and spring I did not
differ.
Sll much lower PM2.6
PMio W - 18.6 ± 10.1; SI - 28.0 ± 5.5;
Sll - 20.3 ± 2.4/yg/m3
Metal data equivocal as well as highly variable
resuspension rates
Total PAHs: W - 303; SI - 233; Sll - 204
ngfmg PMio (ppbnflammation (IL-6, TNF, NO)
/Cytotoxicity: A dose-dependent increase was
observed for TNF, IL-6 and NO except for SI. The
IL-6 levels, of those particles exposed to SI,
decreased at 1000 /yglmL.
TNF, IL-6: SI - Sll > >W>control.
NO production: W> -Sl> - Sll
Cell Viability: W - SI - Sll toxic at 500 and
1000/yg/mL
Watersoluble vs Insoluble: TNF and IL-6 were
nearly entirely the result of insoluble components
of PMio. Cytotoxicity was driven by both soluble
and insoluble components.
Metal Chelation: The addition of metal chelators
did not modify IL-6, TNF or cytotoxicity
LPS inhibitor: Treatment with the LPS inhibitor
eliminated the IL-6 response and, perhaps, slightly
reduced the TNF response but not cytotoxicity
Hydroxy radicals: A dose-dependent induction of
hydroxy radicals and induction of hydroxy radical
lesions (at 500 and 1000 //gfm3) in the calf
thymus DNA were observed.
July 2009 D-66 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Samet et
al. (2003,113782)
Species: Human
Cell Type: A431
(Epidermoid Cells)
As: NaAS03
V: V0S04
Zn: ZnS04
(obtained from Sigma, St. Louis, MO)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 500//M
Time to Analysis: 20, 30 or
90min
EGFR Dimerization: Zn, V or As did not induce
EGFR dimerization in a cell free system i.e., no
direct crosslinking. Zn did not induce dimerization
in whole cells either.
Phosphorylation of EGFR: Zn induced
phosphorylation at 3 sites similar to EGF. As and V
had no effect.
EGFR Kinase Inhibitor: While EGF action was
blocked, Zn continued to induce phosphorylation
and was independent of EGFR kinase activity.
c-Src: Blocking of c-Src tyrosine kinase
(transactivator of phosphorylation) negated all Zn-
induced phosphorylation but only had a slight
effect on EGF stimulated cells.
ERK1/2 Phosphorylation: Zn increased levels of
ERK1/2. Pretreatment with EFGR kinase inhibitor
reduced both Zn and EGF effect. This effect was
not blocked by the c-Src blocker.
Reference: Santini et DEP: PM2.6
al. (2004, 087879) Collected adjacent to moderate traffic in
Species: Mouse Rome, Italy
Cell Type: RAW Particle Size: PM2.6
264.7
Route: Cell Culture (2.5 X10!l
cells.i'niL)
Dose/Concentration: 0.01, 0.1,
1.0/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: 24h
500 MHz results (no 1 /jg/mL): DEP induced a
dose-dependent increase in choline compounds, a-
and fBgamma- glutaminefglutamate (0.01 >0.1
/yg/mL), lactate, and CH2, CH3 moieties of fatty
acids. DEP decreased inositol and
(phosphoreatinine.
700 MHz results (no 1 /jg/mL): DEP induced
similar results, except a-, fBgamma-glutamine
were dose-dependent. Inositol showed no effect.
Taurine slightly increased. Results were confirmed
after eliminating biological interferences via
perchloric acid.
Growth Curves/Cell Cycle Analyses/Cell
Morphology: DEP had no effect.
Cytokines: IL-6 levels increased at 0.1 and 1
/yg/mL. TNF-a was unaffected.
Species: Mouse
Cell Type: RAW
264.7
Reference: Saxena et DEP: SRM 1650
al. (2003, 096986) co. Cmde 0rganic Extract of DEp
Fractionated into
asphaltene (pentane/hexane),
saturated hydrocarbon,
less polar (aromatic) hydrocarbon,
more polar (aromatic) hydrocarbon,
resins, residual (resins)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture (2.5 X10'
cells.i'niL)
Dose/Concentration: DEP, CO 5,
10,15,20, 25 //g/mL
IFNy 10 ng/mL
LPS 1 mg/mL
Time to Analysis: 1 -3d
Cytotoxicity: No cytotoxic effects were
observed.
NO: DEP alone induced NO in a dose-dependent
manner which peaked after 1 d and plateaued for
days 2 and 3. IFNy + DEP showed dose- and time-
dependency. LPS + DEP showed no effect at 1 d,
but dose-dependently reduced NO production on
day 2 and 3. Addition of BC G eliminated the
effect of DEP at 2d but showed a dose-dependent
decrease at 3d.
Effectiveness of Particulate Components: The
carbonaceous core of DEP did not affect BC G-
stimulated NO production. CO significantly
inhibited BC G-stimulated NO production. Study
indicated that the extract of aromatic
hydrocarbons and resins caused an inhibitory
effect in a dose-dependent manner.
July 2009 D-67 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Seagrave
et al. (2007, 097549)
Species: Human
Gender: Male (3
donors)
Age: 16, 23yrs
Cell Type:
Differentiated A549
DE: Generated by DE 5500 watt generator
using #2 certification oil performed under
5000w load. Emissions diluted to 3 mgfm3
total particulate matter.
Particle Size: 0.14 - 0.5 /jm
Route: Air Liquid Interface
Dose/Concentration: 8.33
mLfminfwell
Time to Analysis: 3h; 1 or 21 h
postexposure
Particle Deposition: 140 and 500 nm
microspheres demonstrated uniform deposition of
approx. 10%
Transepithelial Electric Resistance: No effect
of DE; rather, more effect was observed from air
controls
Macromolecular permeability: DE caused an
increase 1-h but returned to control at 21 h.
LDH/Cytotoxicity: DE had a highly variablefdonor
specific) effect at 1-h and returned to control
levels at 21 h
Mitochondrial activity (WST): DE reduced
activity at 1-h and possibly increased activity at
21 h (high donor-to-donor variability)
MucusLike Substance Excretion: There was
high donor to donor variability; no overall effects
were observed.
Alkaline Phosphatase (AP): DE decreased at 1-h
and perhaps increased at 21 h
Glutathione: DE caused a large decrease at 1-h
but returned to normal at 21 h.
HO-1: After DE exposure, levels increased but
were still lower than air exposed controls
Cytokines: No differences for IL- 8 or 12, TNFa,
GM-GSF, IL-1 a, or IFNy were observed. IL-4 and 6
were decreased upon DE exposure.
Reference: Seagrave DPM: SRM2975 (NIST)
et al. (2004, 087470) qpi\/|.q: 0p|\/| organic extract (acetone/DCM)
Species: Human CB. Carbon B|ack (E|f,ex.12, Cabot)
Cell Type. A549 Particle Size: CB: 37nm; Stokes diameter
198nm
Route: Cell Culture (1x106
cells/well)
Dose/Concentration: 0.03 -
1,000 /yglcm2
Time to Analysis: 0,18h
IL-8 release: DPM increased semi dose-
dependently (perhaps steady based on error range)
up to 1 //gjcnr after which IL-8 declined dose
dependently to zero (control - 100%) at 300 and
1000 /yglcm2. LDH release was steady which
indicates no cytotoxicity.
DPM interaction with IL-8: DPM depletes IL-8
from solution in a dose-dependent manner
(cellfree). BSA preincubation reduced the slope of
the dose response but not the final result. CB has
no effect.
DPM-0 residuals act identical to DPM.
Increasing NaCI concentrations reduced DPMs
depletion of IL-8
Neutrophil responses: DPM and bound IL-8
together caused a marked aggregation of cells
resulting in spindle shapes. DEM or IL-8 alone did
not cause this aggregation although DEP did
recruit neutrophils
July 2009 D-68 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Seagrave
et al. (2003, 054979)
Species: Human, Rat
Cell Line: F344jCrl
BR (mouse)
Age: 11 wks (mouse)
Weight: 250g
Cell Type: A549,
AMs
PM filter collection
Collected from diesel or gasoline powered
vehicles as follows:
BG: Black Smoke Gasoline
G30: Normal Emitter gasoline (30F)
G: Normal emitter gasoline (72F)
HD: High Emitter Diesel
D30: current technology diesel (30F)
D: current technology diesel (72F)
WG: White Smoke Gasoline
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture (1x106
cells/well)
Dose/Concentration: 0.03 -
10,000 /yglcm2
Time to Analysis: 16-18h
Cytotoxicity: LDH activity increased in A549
cells. The types of pollutants that are most toxic,
in decreasing order of cytotoxicity, are the
following: BG, G30, and G which are significantly
different from HD, D30, D, WG which are also
significantly different from DS. LDH activity also
increased in rat macrophages. G, G30, and BG
were the most toxic. HD and D30 were
intermediately toxic and D, WG, and DS were the
least toxic. In both cell types, gasoline was more
cytotoxic than diesel.
Cytokines: All particle types except DS increased
IL-8 levels in A549 though not all increases were
statistically significant. Also, many particle
samples at high concentrations produced an
apparent suppression of IL-8 release.
Alkaline Phosphatase: G30 and G were more
potent than the other particle samples in A549.
WG and D30 induced no significant effects. For
A549 cells, activity increased at low
concentrations and was suppressed at higher
concentrations.
Macrophage Peroxide Production: In rat AMs,
peroxide production was often the highest at the
lowest concentrations and the lowest production
caused by the highest concentrations. D30
followed this trend and induced the highest
production as well as the greatest suppression.
Using two different statistical methods, D30 > 6
others which in turn > DS. Using the second
method D30 and D > all other 6. Order of potency
between two methods completely different.
Authors noted that in vitro potency quite different
from in vivo potency (previous paper).
Reference: Seaton. PM2.6 from London
et al. 2005
Species: Human
Cell Type: A549
PMn from Manchester (positive control)
PM from Holland Park, Hampstead and Oxford
Circus stations (HP, HR and OC)
PM2.6 monitoring
Holland Park, Hampstead and Oxford Circus
PM had a median diameter of 0.4/ym. 80% of
the particles had a diameter less than 1 //m.
Particle Size: PM2.6, PM10, Holland Park,
Hampstead and Oxford Circus PM had a
median diameter of 0.4 fjm. 80% of the
particles had a diameter less than 1 //m.
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 1-100
/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: Cytotoxicity:
24h; IL-8: 8h; Generation of
hydroxy radicals: 8h
Cytotoxicity: Dust from all three tunnels (Holland
Park, Hampstead and Oxford Circus) were able to
cause cell death (LDH). The release of LDH
indicated a dose-dependent relationship. The
highest dose of Holland Park PM induced the
— 17% release of LDH, Hampstead triggered —
13% and Oxford Circus — 3% (no different than
control). PM10 from Manchester caused a 7% LDH
release at the highest dose. The negative control
(Ti02) caused no response (2% release at highest
dose).
IL-8: All three tunnel PMs induced a dose-
dependent release of IL-8. At the highest dose, all
three tunnel dusts induced IL-8 stimulation more
so than the control site PM2.6. HP induced a 3 fold
increase. Also, the highest Ti02 concentration
caused the least IL-8 stimulation.
Hydroxy Radical Generation/ DNA Plasmid
assay: The plasmid assay indicated that the
tunnel dusts induce more free radical activity than
the Manchester PM10 and Ti02.
HP nearly doubled the percentage of DNA damage
with intermediate results for HR and OC. Results
for PM10, Ti02 and control were identical
July 2009
D-69
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Singal et
al. 2005
Species: Human,
Mouse
Cell Type/Line:
A549Luc1 lung
adenocarcinoma
epithelial cell line
(human), MLE15Luc1
and MLE15Luc2
(mouse)
All cells contain
human cytokine IL-8
controlling firefly
luciferase
AE2: Aerosil 200, amorphous silica (Degussa)
CI: Carbon iron particles (25 % Fe)
Particle Size: AE2: 12nm surface area
-200 ± 25 m2/g: CI: ~40nm
Route: Cell Culture (5x106
cells/well)
Dose/Concentration: 18 //gfniL,
36 /yglmL, 72 /yglmL all in 1 mL
/well
Time to Analysis: 24h
Luc activity: Luciferase enzyme activity is
significantly less in MLE15Luc2 cells than in
MLE15Luc1 cells. For both cells, luciferase
activity is time- and dose-dependent peaking at 4-
8 hours.
Aerosil 200: AE2 induced dose- and time-
dependent Luc response which peaked at 3 h and
decreased thereafter in a similar way as TNF.
Contrary to TNF, AE2 induced much cytotoxicity
starting at 6h.
Effect of proteasomal inhibitors (MG-132):
Inhibitor reduced AE2 Luc activity to near control
levels. Similarly, LDH-cytotoxicity was halved
A549 human cell response: AE2 acted similarly
to the MLE response. CI particles showed slightly
less activity without peaks. AE2 increased
cytotoxicity after 12 h, whereas CI had no effect.
Contrary to MLE mouse, MG_132 did not affect
Luc activity but PD98059 (selective
noncompetitive inhibitor of the MAP pathway) and
SN50 (NF- kB inhibitor) reduced AE 2 and CI-
induced activity.
Reference: Song et
al. (2008,156093)
Species: Rat
Cell Type: RAW
264.7
DEP collected from a 4JB1 -type, light-duty
(2740 cc), four-cylinder diesel engine operated
using standard diesel fuel at speeds of 1500
rpm under a load of 10 torque.
Particle Size: 0.4 /jm (mean diameter)
Route: Cell Culture (5 X 10E cells
seeded on a 24-well plate)
Dose/Concentration: 50//gfmL
Time to Analysis: Nitrate
production: 72h.
Nitrite Production: 50//gfmL of DEP induced
production when compared to the control. Over
the 72-h period, a general trend was not observed,
but maximal induction of nitrite occurred at 4 h
after stimulation.
Reference:
Steerenberg et al.
(2006, 088249)
Species: Rat, Human
Cell Line: Crl/WKY
(rat)
Cell Type: AMs (rat),
alveolar epithelium
cells (rat), A549
PMC: PM Coarse
PMF: PM fine
Ambient air samples collected from Rome,
Italy: Oslo, Norway: Lodz, Poland: Amsterdam,
the Netherlands; De Zilk, the Netherlands.
Particle Size: PMC: 2.35 ¦ 8.5/jm; PMF:
0.12 ¦ 2.35/ym
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: NR
Time to Analysis: 20h
Crustal material (metals and endotoxin but not Ti,
As, Cd, Zn, V, Ni, Se) were positively associated
with on vitro rat macrophage IL-6 and TNFa and
in vitro Type 2 (rat alveolar) MP-2 and II-6. Sea
spray (Na and CI) was also correlated with
Macrophage IL-6
Reference: Tal et al.
(2006,108588)
Species: Human
Cell Type: HAEC
100 mM Zn(ll) or V(IV) stock solutions (N0S)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 500/ymol
Time to Analysis: 5, 20min
Zn-mediated EGFR phosphorylation: EGFR
kinase activity was required but not EFGR ligand
binding. EGFR Kinase inhibition reduced Zn
mediated EGFR activation, (authors NOTE:
complete reverse of results in B82L and A431
cells). Src Kinase is not required. Zn inhibiting Src
kinase was nearly total after 20 min.
EGFR-specific protein tyrase phosphatase
(PTP): Zn inhibited PTPs, similar to V(IV) resulting
in a decrease of exogenous EGFR
dephosphorylation
Reference: Tamaoki
et al. (2004,157040)
Species: Human
Cell Type: HBEC
UFCB: Ultrafine Carbon Black
Japan)
FCB: Fine Carbon Black (Tokai Carbon, Japan)
Particle Size: UFCB: 11 ± 0.5 nm (mean
diameter)
FCB: 250 ± 16nm (mean diameter)
(Tokai Carbon, Route: Cell Culture (10' cells/well)
Dose/Concentration: 6.1,12.3,
18.4,24.5, 30.7/yg|cm2
Time to Analysis: Up to 72h
DNA synthesis/ Protein synthesis: Synthesis
increased by UFCB (30.7) for up to 72 h and
flattened after 48 h. FCB had no effect. UFCB
also showed a dose-dependent response beginning
at 12.3 /yg.cm2 up to 24.5 whereafter the
response plateaued. The addition of Cu/Zn Super
oxide dismutase (SOD) or a NADPH oxidase
inhibitor completely inhibited the UFCB effects.
Similarly, two different EGFR tyrosine kinase
inhibitors, and a Me inhibitor all reduced UFCB
response to control levels.
ERK activation: UFCB caused phosphorylation of
ERK beginning at 2 min, peaking at 5 min and
decreasing at 10 min. ERK activation was
inhibited by EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor Cu/Zn
SOD and neutralizing body for HB-EGF but not by
PDGF-R kinase inhibitor.
HB (polyclonal heparin binding)-EGF release:
UFCB induced rapid cell surface loss with recovery
after 20 min and nearly full recovery at 360 min.
Metalloproteinase inhibitor and Cu/Zn SOD both
prevented HB-EGF release.
July 2009
D-70
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Tao and Kobzik
(2002,157044)
Species: Rat
Cell Type: RLE-6TN
(Alveolar Type II
Epithelial Cells), Fetal
Lung Fibroblasts
(RFL), AMs
UAP: Urban Air Particles - SRM 1649
HO2: Titanium dioxide
SiO?
ROFA
Particle Size: Titk ~1//m;Si02: ~1//m;
ROFA: NR
Route: Cell Cuilture (1x10E5 cells
AM
1.4x10E5 cells RLE/RFL)
Dose/Concentration: 1 -50 //cj/mL
Time to Analysis: 24h
Cytokines: TNF-a and MIP-2 in RLE was
unaffected by any particle samples. TNF-a and
MIP-2 in AM significantly increased with 25
/yg/mL UAP. TNF-a and MIP-2 in the co-culture of
AM + RLE increased with each particle. The order
of particles in decreasing order are as follows:
SiO? at 25/yg/mL, UAP at 12.5/yglmL, ROFA at
25 /yglmL, and Ti02 at 50 /yglmL. Except for Si02,
the blocking of effects caused by LPS absorbed on
the particles did not affect the cytokine response.
For Si02, the response was reduced but still above
the control.
Co-culture: Physically separating AM and RLE
cells and adding PM completely negated the co-
culture's response to PMs. This indicates that cell
to cell contact is required for co-culture
potentiation of PM effects.
Inhibitors: Various inhibitors of cell adhesion
molecules (heparin, f3 -1, 2 or 3 integrin) had no
effect on UAP-induced cytokine release.
Reference: Veranth
et al. (2007, 090346)
Species: Human
Cell Type: BEAS-2B,
A549, NHBE
Artificial particles and PMs
N-AI: nano alumina AI2O3
M-AI: Micro AI2O3
N-Ce: nano Ce02
M-Ce: micro Ce02
N-Fe: nano Fe203
M-Fe: micro Fe203
N-Ni: nano NiO
M-Ni: micro NiO
N-Si: nano Si02
M-Si: micro Si02
N-Ti: nano Ti02
M-Ti: micro Ti02
KLN: kaolin
MUS: Min-U-Sil (ground crystalline silica)
DD: desert rural soil Utah PM2.6
JE: Juarez, urban street PM2.6
MNC: Mancos, rural Utah PM2.6
LPS: lipopolysaccharide
V: VOSO4 (soluble) (19 /yglmL)
TNFa (0.01 /yglmL)
Particle Size: Surface mean diameter/
surface
N-AI: 6nm (261 m2|g)
M-AI: 210nm (7.7)
N-Ce: 14nm (71)
M-Ce: 1500nm (0.6)
N-Fe: 5nm (221)
M-Fe: 10Onm (12)
N-Ni: 6nm (145)
M-Ni: 16nm (57)
N-Si: 19nm (127)
M-Si: 440nm (5.4)
N-Ti: 6nm (242)
M-Ti: 41 Onm (3.5)
KLN: 10Onm (24.3)
MUS (NOS <5//m)
DD: 400nm (6.2)
JE (NOS < 3/ym)
MNC: 200nm (13.0)
Route: Cell Culture (35,000
cells/cm2 BEAS; 2500 cells/cm2
NHBE: 20,000 cm2 A549)
Dose/Concentration: 0.53, 5.3
and 53/yg/cm2
(- 1,10,100/yg/mL)
Time to Analysis: 24h
Cell Viability: Except for Ni and V no cytotoxicity
was observed at the highest concentration.
IL-6 secretion in BEAS-2 B cells: Nano and
micro sizes of the same metal showed no
differences in response (high experiment to
experiment variability). In general, the soil-derived
dusts (JE, DD, MNC) were more potent than the
metal and ceramic oxide particles. In KGM media,
BEAS-2B cells are more responsive to vanadium
and other soluble metals and less responsive to
LPS, but this relationship is reversed in LHC-9
media.
IL-8 secretion in BEAS/LHC vs NHBE in BEGM
cells:
Levels were much higher in NHBE cells than BEAS-
2B cells. For BEAS-2B, the nano size Si and both
sizes of Ni induced levels statistically greater than
the control. For NHBE, only Si and Ni (for both
sizes) were statistically greater than control.
IL-6 in NHBE: The nano and micro sized particles
of Al, Ce, Fe and nano sized Si all induced
statistically significant increases. Control levels of
IL-6 were much higher in NHBE cells than in BEAS-
2B cells. Secretion induced by pure oxide particles
was small for both the mid and high concentration
levels (5.3 and 53 /yg/cm2).
BSA/ Bovine serum addition effect: In a fixed
solution nano-Ni, nano-Ti and KLN all reduced the
measured IL-6 by 60+ percent. Addition of BSA or
bovine serum dose dependently reduced the action
of the particles to near control levels.
PM effects (without added protein) on IL-6 in
solution: Increasing metal concentration did not
affect a fixed IL-6 concentrration until the 100 or
316/yg/mL levels.
July 2009 D-71 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Veranth
et al. (2007, 090346)
Species: Human,
mouse, rat
Cell Type: A549,
BEAS-2B (types E and
U), RAW 264.7,
Primary macrophages
S: desert dust (collected from unpaved desert
road in Utah, PM2.6 enriched)
V: vanadium soluble (prepared from VOSO4,
Alfa Aesar, Ward Hill, MA))
C: Coal fly ash (PM2.6 enriched and derived
from commercial power plant burning Utah
bituminous coal)
D: Diesel PM (tail pipe particles collected from
high emitting black smoker on-road light duty
truck)
L: Lipopolysaccharide
T: Titanium dioxide (Alfa Aesar)
K: Kaolin (purchased from Capitol Ceramics,
UT)
Particle Size: BET surface (m2fg)
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentrations: Maximum
concentrations:
S - 100/yg/cm2
V - 100/yg/cm2
C - 100 /yglcm2
D - 32/yg/cm2
L - 1000 EU/mL
T - 100 /yglcm2
K - 100 /yglcm2
Time to Analysis: 24h
6.2 (PM2.6 enriched)
NA
5.4 (PM2.6 enriched)
NR
NA
3.5 (1-2/ym)
K: 24 (< 200 mesh - 74/ym)
Viability: Generally, cell viability was greater than
75% of the control post treatment. Vanadium, at
the highest concentration, induced less than 50%
of control viability whereas kaolin, also at the
highest concentration, induced cell death.
Cytokine IL-6: BEAS-2B E or U in LHC-9 showed
a response to S and L. BEAS-2B (U) was in LHC-9
medium with added serum (FBS). This resulted in a
doubling of response coupled with at least an 8
fold increase in control levels. BEAS-2B (E)
showed response for S and V but not L. A549
showed response to S and K. RAW 264.7 and Rat
macrophages showed responses to Sfvery low)
and L. In general, the IL-6 responses in A549
and RAW 264.7 were similar and significantly
lower than the responses in rat macrophages or
BEAS-2B.
Effect of culture media composition (BEAS-
2B): Varying ratios of LHC-9 and KGM media
resulted in a near 10 fold increase in control rate
once LHC was 33% or more of the media. Upon
Soil Dust (NOS) exposure IL-6 increased linearly
with % LHC-9 in culture/exposure media. Addition
of calf serum (0.1-10 %) raised control IL-6 levels
at least 40 fold. At a steady PM concentration,
the addition of serum resulted in a log-linear
increase in IL-6 release which blocked any PM
effect.
Reversibility of media effect: Changing media
with every passage showed that media effects do
not persist once media are changed.
Culture Well Size: Going from a 6 well to 96
well plate (decreasing well size) increased IL-6
control values about ten fold, while the positive
control (TNF) response increased 3 fold. Hence the
sensitivity of the test (i.e., positive/control
response) declined from 11 fold to 3 fold with
increasing well number I decreasing well size.
Because cell seeding density and the like were
held constant, these changes suggest that edge
effects are the cause of the IL-6 changes.
Reference: Veranth
et al. (2006, 087479)
Species: Human
Cell Type: BEAS-2B
PM2.6 samples from 28 samples from 8
locations in Utah, New Mexico and Texas
(rural, industrial, road side, military)
2 coal fly ash samples (a product of
combustion using Utah bituminous coal and
New Mexico bituminous coal)
Ti02
kaolin clay
Particle Size: PM2.6; Ti02: 1-2/jm
Route: Cell Culture (35,000 cells/
cm2 in KGM media)
Dose/Concentration: 10, 20,40,
80/yg/cm2
Time to Analysis: 24h
Cell assays: In sample soils viability declined dose
dependently while IL-6 increased dose-
dependently. IL-8 was highly variable (peak at 20
/ygll, dose-dependent increase or flat response.)
IL-6 assays for all soil PMs: Soils ranged across
an order of magnitude greater than LPS, coal fly
ash, Ti02 or kaolin samples. One soil even
exceeded the pos V control at equal
concentrations
Correlation with cell viability: Correlation was
strong for Mn (p < 0.001) and weak for EC3, K,
Se, and Hg (0.01 < p < 0.05).
IL-6 -10 //g/cm2: Correlation was medial for 0C-
1 (Organic Carbon) and P at 0.001 < p< 0.01.
IL-6 80 fjgl cm2: Correlation was strong for 0C3,
OP (pyrolized Carbon), 0C, EC1, TC and
intermediate for 0C2, 0C4, Zn and weak for
Ca2+, EC2, Si, Ca, Ca: Al.
IL-8 10 //g/cm2: Correlation was weak for EU
(Endotoxin), C03, Si, and Br.
IL-8 80 //g/cm2: Correlation was medial for C03,
Sr and weak for K +, EC3, Mg, Si.
IL-8 trend (corr over 10-80 range): Correlation
was strong for EC, intermediate for 0C4, EC1,
EC2, EC3, TC, Ni and weak for OP, 0C, Cr, and
Sr. IL-6 and II-8 were not correlated nor were IL-6
and cell viability. Authors noted that weak
correlations (0.01
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Veranth
et al. (2004, 087480)
Species: Human
Cell Type: BEAS-2B
Veranth et al. 2004
PM2.E enriched soil samples
DD: desert dust, unpaved road, Utah
WM: West Mesa, sandy grazing site, NM
R40: Range 40 gravel soil, TX
UN: Uinta, sandy soil, UT
Particle Size: 0.4 - 3//m
Route: Cell Culture (20,000/cm2)
Dose/Concentration: 10, 20,40,
80,160 /yglcm2
Time to Analysis: 24h
Elemental Analysis of PM's: Major differences
UN generally lower in major minerals but high Fe
content and high EC. High Mn. Low Pb and Zn
Cytotoxicity: UN and WM were the most
cytotoxic at all dose levels, followed by R40 and
DD. All particles showed a dose-dependent
cytotoxic response.
IL-6 Release: DD and R40 (up to the 160//gfcm2)
showed dose-dependent responses and induced an
8-fold increase at the highest concentration levels.
WM peaked at 40//gfcm2 and UN induced similar
responses above 10 /yglcm2.
IL- 8 release: DD induced a dose-dependent
response. WM peaked at 10 /yglcm2. Release
induced by DD and WM seemed to be limited by
toxicity. There was no treatment with R40.
TNF-a: DD, WM and UN induced release was not
detected at the 40 or 80 /yglcm2 concentrations.
LPS: LPS was the primary factor in inducing IL-6
release when exposed to LPS-containing mixtures.
LPS alone induced lesser responses than
treatment to the environmental dust particles.
TiLPS induced a less than two-fold increase in IL-6
versus the over seven-fold increase induced by soil
dust positive control. LPS treatments were less
cytotoxic than DD. Limited IL-6 and IL-8 responses
were observed at 2000 EU/mL compared with DD
at 80 /yglcm2
Endotoxin: Inverse relationship between
endotoxin content and IL-6 release was observed.
Viability vs Physical Modification of Dust
Sample (no UN): Only leaching in a variety of
water based vehicles increased viability minimally
(generally < 25 %). Heat treatment (150-, 300,
550F) and methanol extraction had no effect
IL-6 release vs Physical Modification of Dust
Sample (no UN): One hour thermal treatment at
150n F had no effect on IL-6 response. All other
treatments reduced IL-6 release (heat 350a 500n
and extractions).
Reference: Veronesi
et al. (2002, 024599)
Species: Human
Cell Type: BEAS-2B
Ambient PM
- St. Louis: Urban particulates
- Ottawa: Urban particulates
¦MSH: Volcanic dust from Washington state's
Mt. St. Helen
¦Woodstove: Woodstove particles from
conventional fireplace burner
¦CFA: Coal fly ash from western U.S.
powerplant
-OFA: Oil fly ash from Niagara, NY
¦ A: Total Fractions
- B: Soluble Fractions
¦ C: Washed Fractions
Particle Size: PM > 2.5/ym; PM: 2-10/jm;
PM > 10/ym
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 50//gfmL;
30/yg/cm2
100/yg/mL; 60/yg/cm2
Time to Analysis: 4,16h
Ca: Calcium increased significantly with all
particles types.
IL-6: At 50 and 100//gfmL, IL-6 increased with all
particle types at 4 and 16h. Overall, fraction -A
was the most potent.
Surface charge: Surface charge correlated
strongly with increases in both Ca2+ and IL-6
levels. OFA, however, was unmeasurable due to
technical difficulties.
July 2009 D-73 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Vogel et
al. (2005, 087891)
Species: Human
Cell Type: U937
(ATCC) monocytes
(macrophage
differentiation)
UDP: SRM 1649 (NIST)
UDP-OE: DCM extract of SRM-1649, 0.45 fjm
filter
sLIDP: stripped particles UDP
DEP: SRM 2975 (NIST)
DEP-OE: DCM extract of SRM-2975, 0.45 fjm
filter
sDEP: stripped particles DEP
CB95: Carbon Black (Degussa)
Particle Size: UDP, DEP: NR; CB95: 95nm
Route: Cell Culture (2 X106 - 2
X10e cellsfmL)
Dose/Concentration: DEP, UDP:
2.5,10 or 40 /yglcm2
(eq to 12.5,40, 200 /yglmL)
DEP-OE, UDP- OE: 10/yg/cm2
(particle equivalent)
Time to Analysis: 24h
Effect on mRNA expression (COX-2, TNFa, IL-
6, IL-8, C/EBPP, CRP, CYP1a1): All DEP and
UDP induced dose-dependent increases. IL-6
tended to plateau at 10/yg/cm2. Generally, with
the exception of C0X-2, UDP effects on genes
were stronger than DEP.
Cytotoxicity: Both DEP and UDP were cytotoxic
at 40 /yglcm2
Fractionation and mRNA expression: For COX-
2, TNFa, IL-8 mRNA fractions were much more
active than parent particles and consequently
stripped particles were much less active than
parent particles. CB95 had no effect. The reverse
effect occurred for IL-6 and CRP mRNA
expression. The particles that induced mRNA
expression in decreasing order are: sUDP, UDP,
UDP-OE.
Inhibition of mRNA expression: CRP:
pretreatment with IgG and wortmannin (Fey
receptor binding and ingestion dependent inhibitors
respj blocked the effects of DEP, UDP and sDEP
and sUDP. Luteolin (AhR inhibitor) had no effect.
COX-2: Only luteolin inhibited C0X-2 expression
for DEP, DEP-OE, UDP, and UDP-OE.
CYP1 a 1: Luteolin also inhibited OE-DEP and OE-
DUP effects (only those two particles tested).
Cholesterol accumulation: DEP, UDP and UDP-
OE and DEP-OE at 10 /yg/cm2 all increased
cholesterol accumulation by at least 2 fold
Reference: Wang et
al. (2003,157106)
Species: Rat
Cell Type: Lung
Myofibroblasts
V20e: (Aldrich Chemical Co., Wisconsin)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture (1 X10!l
cells/100 mm dish; 3.2 X104
cells/cm2)
Dose/Concentration: 400 fjm
Time to Analysis: 0.5,1, 4, 24h
H2O2 drives STAT-1 activation: Pretreatment
with NAC or catalase reduced V2OB—induced STAT
activation by more than 90% and completely
abolished H202-induced STAT activation. Within 5
min of V2O6 treatment, H2O2 was significantly
decreased in the supernatants of cultured
myofibroblasts and suppression of H2O2 levels
continued for up to 24h post V2O6 treatment. This
supports the findings that myofibroblast-generated
H2O2 is required for V2OB—induced STAT
activation.
Temporal STAT-1 activation: H2O2 induced
rapid activation within minutes whereas activation
by V2OE occurred more slowly (beginning 8h post
treatment).
p38, ERK, EGFR: p38 and EGFR are required for
H2O2- or V2OB—induced STAT-1 activation whereas
ERK is not required
Reference: Whitekus
et al. (2002,157142)
Species: Mouse
Cell Line: RAW
264.7
DEP (light-duty, four-cylinder engine- 4JB1
type, Isuzu Automobile, Japan; standard diesel
fuel) (extracts)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 50//gfmL
Time to Analysis: DEP extracts
suspended in methanol and
sonicated 20min. Centrifuged
10min. Dried DEP resuspended
and stored -20°C. Cell cultures
maintained 37 °C. Exposed to
antioxidants 5h. H0-1 western
blot, determination of cellular
GSH:GSSG ratios, carbonyl protein
content, lipid hydroperoxides
performed.
DEP significantly reduced the GSH:GSSG ratio.
This effect was prevented by adding thiol
antioxidants NAC or BUC. DEP increased lipid
peroxide levels, but the addition of all antioxidants
decreased these levels. DEP increased carbonyl
groups. NAC, BUC, and luteolin reduced HO-1
expression.
July 2009 D-74 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Wilson et CB: Carbon Black, Printex 90 (Degussa)
al. (2007, 097268) FeC|3
Species: Mouse
Cell Type: J774
ZnCI2
Particle Size: CB: 14 nm
Route: Cell Culture (4 X10!l
cells.i'niL at 1 mL/well)
Dose/Concentration: CB 1.9-31
//g/mL; FeCIs, ZnCI2 0.01 ¦ 100
//mo
Time to Analysis: 4h
ROS production in cells: CB alone increased
R0S. Coexposure with ZnCI2 did not affect ROS.
ROS production - cell free: CB induced a
significant increase in ROS. ZnCI2 had no effect.
Coexposure CB/Zn also had no effect.
TNFa production (Fe -Zn 0.01-100 /rniol):
Coexposure of CB over a range of metals gave no
change over CB alone for Fe. For Zn, only at the
concentration of 100 //mol was there a small
interaction between Zn and CB.
Similar results were seen at metal concentrations
between 20 -100 //mol. Synergism was observed
between Zn and CB and no observed effect of Fe.
Macrophage cytoskeleton: CB resulted in black
vacuoles. Co-treatment of cells with Zn and CB
increased the severity of Zn effects. Fe exhibited
no synergism.
Apoptosis /necrosis: No synergism of CB with
either Fe or Zn
Phagocytosis: Only at 31 //mol CB and 50/ymol
Zn did a synergistic effect occur; it resulted in a 4-
fold reduction
Reference: Wottrich
et al. (2004, 094518)
Species: Human
Cell Type: A549,
THP-1, Mono Mac 6
Fe: hematite a-Fe203
Si60: silicasol (SiOy, amorphous silica)
Si100: silicasol
~: crystalline quartz DQ12
Particle Size: Fe: 50 ¦ 90nm; Si60: 60nm;
Si100: 80 -110 nm; Q <5 /jm
Route: Cell Culture (2 X10'
cells/well. Co-culture: 2 X104
A549 and 2 X103 Macrophages)
Dose/Concentration: A549 light
microscopy hematite 100/yg/mL
(23/yg/cm )
TEM hematite 50//g/mL (16
//g/cm2)
Cytotoxicity 10, 50,100 and 200
//g/mL (6.1, 30, 61 and 121
//g/cm2)
Cytokines 50 and 200//g/mL
Time to Analysis: 24 h
Particle Uptake: Hematite agglomeration was
observed in all 3 cell lines. TEM confirmed cytosol
aggregates as well as single particles, which
includes particles transported intracellular^ to
basolateral membrane of epithelial cells.
Cytotoxicity: LDH increased significantly in
A549. In decreasing order, Q, Fe, S60, and
S100 (which exhibited levels similar to controls)
all induced cytotoxicity. THP-1 cells appeared the
most sensitive with Q, Fe, S60, S100, control
inducing cytotoxicity in decreasing order. Mono
Mac 6 cells were the least sensitive with Fe, S60,
Q, S100.
Cytokines: IL-6 and IL-8 released from A549 cells
upon exposure to all particles. No response was
observed in Mono Mac 6 or in THP-1 cells.
Co-cultures: Mix of A549 with either Mono Mac
6 or THP-1 led to a large (ten fold) increase in
response to particles. Ten fold increases were
observed in IL-6 and IL-8 levels with the Mono
Mac 6 co-culture and the THP-1 co-culture,
respectively.
July 2009 D-75 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Wu et al. ZnSOi (Sigma)
(2007, 098412) Particle Size: NR
Species: Human
Cell Line: B82L
Cell Type: B82L- par
(parental fibroblasts),
B82L-wt (wild type
EGFR), B82L-K721M
(kinase defective
EGFR), B82L-c*958
(COOH-terminally
truncated EGFR at
Tyr-958)
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: Zn: 500
/ymol
EGF: 10Ong/mL
Time to Analysis: 20min
EGFR mutations: EGFR-wt has a
functional tyrosine kinase domain,intact Src
phosphorylation (Tyr 845) and 5 tyrosine
autophosphorylation sites. EGFR-c'958 lacks all 5
tyrosine autophosphorylation sites. EGFR-
K721M lacks tyrosine kinase (ATP binding). EGFR-
Y845F lacks Src autophosphorylation (Tyr 845)
and, instead, has a receptor at Tyr 845 that is
phosphorylated by nonreceptor Tyrosine kinase
Src.
Zn Induced Ras (MAPK signaling protein): No
effect was observed in B82L-par cells. Zn had an
effect in -wt, -c'958, and -K721M which confirms
the need for EGFR. This indicates that neither
tyrosine kinase nor autophosphorylation sites
were required for Zn effects. No observed
increase for Y845F indicated that EGFR tyrosine
845 (phosphorylated by c-Src) is required for Zn
effects. However, it was not required for EGF
effects.
Src Kinase requirement: Using a Src blocker
drastically reduced Zn effect but not the EGF
effect. Src activation occurred independent of
EGFR Tyr-845.
Zn induced association of EGFR with Src: Zn
induced a physical association in all 4 mutants;
EGF did not.
Zn induced phosphorylation of EGFR at Tyr-
845: Zn induced phosporylation of EGFR at Tyr-
845 in B82L-wt,-c'958 and -K721M. EGF
exhibited similar effects. Src blockers significantly
reduced phosphorylation induced by Zn but not for
EGF. Neither Zn or EGF induced phosphorylation in
B82L-Y845F cells.
Reference: Wu, W. Zinc Ion: Zn2+
Wang, X. Particle Size: NR
Zhang, W.
2003
Species: Human
Cell Type: BEAS-2B
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 10, 25, 50
/ymol
Time to Analysis: 0-8h
Cytotoxicity: Exposure to 50 /ymol Zn2+ for 8h
did not result in significant alterations in cell
viability.
PTEN Protein Levels: 50 /ymol Zn2 + for 4 and
8h significantly decreased levels in a dose-
dependent manner. Exposure to 50//M vanadyl
sulfate (tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor) had
minimal effects on PTEN. 100 ng/mL of non-
specified EGF receptor ligand for 1-8h did not
exhibit any significant effects on PTEN levels.
P13K/AI
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Wu et al. Zinc Ion: In2*
(2004, 096949) Particle Size: NR
Species: Human
Cell Type: NHBE
Route: Cell Culture Cell Viability: After 2 h of exposure, Zn2+
Dose/Concentration: 100//mol indu^d e'fe,cuts in NfnE cells at 100 and 200
/ymol levels (but not 50/ymol). Continuing
Time to Analysis: 2h exposure to 100/ymol Zn2+ for 4 and 6 h did not
significantly alter cell viability. Thus, in all
subsequent studies, NHBE cells were treated with
100 /ymol Zn2+.
Induced EGFR Phosphorylation: Exposure to
100//M Zn2+ for 1-4 h induced phosphorylation
of EGFR in NHBE cells. EGFR kinase inhibitor
PD153035 (to determine ifphosphorylation of
EGFR was the result of autophosphorylation of
activated EGFR tyrosine kinase activity) caused
Zn2 + induced phosphorylation to subside. Zn2 +
activity requires tyrosine kinase activity.
EGFR Phosphorylation Pathway: To test
whether Zn exposure results in ligand release,
which in turn can activate phosphorylation, NHBE
cells were pretreated with LA1 blocking antibody.
Results showed significant suppression of Zn2 +
induced phosphorylation, therefore Zn2 +
phosphorylation might be initiated by the release
of EGFR ligands.
HB-EGF, TGF-a , EGF: To examine the
involvement of specific ligands (HB-EGF. TGF-a
and EGF) in the phosphorylation pathway, cells
were exposed to anti-HB-EGF, anti-TGF-a and
anti-EGF. Results showed that anti-HB-EGF
reduced Zn2+ induced phosphorylation
significantly, anti-TGF-a produced partial
inhibition and anti-EGF had no inhibitory effect.
Exposure with blocking antibody LA1 was tested
to determine if it caused an increase in soluble HB-
EGF. HB-EGF mRNA expression was also elevated
in cells exposed to Zn2+. Previous studies indicate
metalloproteinase (MMP) involvement in cleaving
ligand precursors. It was found that MMP-3
inhibitor partially blocks Zn2+ induced HB-EGF
release. (MMP-2 and MMP-9 did not show similar
inhibition patterns) Zn2+exposure increased the
release of MMP-3 from HNBE cells.
July 2009
D-77
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Wu et al.
(2005, 097350)
Species: Human
Cell Line: Subclone
S6
Cell Type: BEAS-2B
Zinc Ion: Zn2+
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 50/ymol
Zn2+
Time to Analysis: 4 or 8h; EGFR
phosphorylation: 30, 60,120, 240
min
Cell viability: Exposure to 50/ymol Zn2+ for 8 h
did not result in significant alterations in cell
viability (assessed by LDH release).
P13K/AI
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Zhang et
al. (2007,156179)
Species: Human, Rat
Cell Type: A549,
RLE-6TN (Alveolar
Type II Epithelial
Cells)
PM2.E: Collected by baghouse from Dusseldorf,
Germany
Particle Characterization: Carbon 20%,
Hydrogen 1.4%, Nitrogen < 0.5%, Oxygen
14.1%, Sulfur 2.1%, Ash 63.2%.
Particle Size: PM2.6
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 100 //gfcm2
Time to Analysis: 24h
Apoptosis: At 100 //gfmL for 24 h, PM induced a
2.5 fold increase in apoptosis in A549.
Mitochondrial Membrane Potential: A
significant reduction in AEC mitochondrial
membrane potential was observed.
Caspase -3 & -9: Increased activity of both
enzymes in both cell types was observed. More
specifically, a 2- to 2.5-fold increase of caspase -3
and -9 in A549 and an 8-fold increase of caspase-
9 and 4-fold increase of caspase-3 in RLE-6TN
were observed.
BIM: Downregulation of BIM by RNA interference
inhibited PM-induced apoptosis. An inhibited
decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential and
activation of both caspases were observed.
Reference: Zhang et
al. (2004,157183)
Species: Mice
Cell Line/Type: C10
(alveolar type ll-like
epithelial cell line)
~EP: SRM 1650a
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 5 or 25
/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: 30-360min
fra expression: DEP induces fra-1 but not fra-2
expression. mRNA induction peaks around 180
min DEP affects fra-1 mRNA expression at the
transcriptional level.
ERK/JI\IK/p38 MAPK signaling pathways: 3
inhibitors (PD-98059, SB-202190 or SP-600125)
all reduced DEP stimulated fra-1 induction to near
control levels. DEP stimulated phosphorylation of
the MAPKs which peaks at 60 min but stays
elevated at 180 min.
MMP-9 promoter activity: fra-1 upregulation
may play a role in DEP induced increases in MMP-
9 promoter activity as fra-1 appears to bind at the
¦79 TRE sequence of the MMP-9 promoter.
Study 6203 cell lines: BEAS-2B (A) HR. Bronch.
Epith ATCC # CRL-9609 passage 44
BEAS-2B (E) HR. bronch. Epith. U.S. EPA passage
76-87
BEAS-2C (U) HR. bronch. Epith U. Utah sample
passage 89-97
A 549 HR. alveolar epith U. Utah sample starts at
passage 84
RAW 264.7 M. macrophage ATCC # TIB-71
1 macrophages Rat lung lavage primary cells
Study 6203 culture media
LHC-9 Lechner and Laveck medium Invitrogen
KGM Keratinocyte growth medium Lonza
DMEM/F12 50 % Dulbecco's modification of
Eagle's medium, 50% Ham's F12 medium Gibco
FBS Fetal bovine serum (added to media
formulations) Invitrogen
Table D-3. Respiratory effects: in vivo studies.
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Adamson et al.
(2003, 087943)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Weight: 150g
PMio: EHC-93W (whole dust)
EHC-93S (soluble)
EHC-93L (leached)
EHC-2KW, -S, -L
Measured components Zn, Mg,
Pb, Fe, Cu, Al
Particle Size: EHC-93W, -93S,
¦93L, -2KW, -2KS, -2KL: PMio
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 5 mg/rat; 33.3 mg/kg
Time to Analysis: 4h, 1 d, 3d, 7d, 14d
BALF Cells: The greatest increase in cell numbers
was observed with EHC-93W. Activity peaked at 1 d
with a return to normal levels by 7d. EHC-93L also
induced an increase in cell numbers, more so than
EHC-93S, but both particles induced statistically
significant increases. However, these increases were
mostly attributable to an increase in the AM and
PMN populations.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: Metallo-
proteinase (MMP) 2 and 9 both increased, peaking at
1d and 4h respectively. MMP2 activity appears
related to the soluble fraction whereas MMP-9
activity appears to be related to the leachable
fraction.
July 2009
D-79
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Ahn et
al. (2008,156199)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: BALB/C1
Age: 6wks
Weight: 19-24g
DEP: Collected using a turbo-
charged, intercooler, 6-cylinder,
heavy-duty, diesel engine
(model year 2000
DPBS: control
Particle Size: NR
Route: Oropharyngeal Aspiration
Dose/Concentration: 1,10, 25 mg/kg per day;
Those receiving 25 mg/kg DEP also received pre-
treatment of Dex (1, 5 mg/kg) 1 h prior
Time to Analysis: 5 consecutive days; 72h post
final exposure
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: Lung injury
was more severe in mice exposed to 25 mg/kg of
DEP than when compared to mice exposed to 1
mg/kg DEP. However, lung injury caused by exposure
to 25 mg/kg DEP could be completely prevented with
pre-treatment of 5mg/kg Dex. Treatment with 1
mg/kg Dex prior to exposure to 25 mg/kg DEP
depicted partial reduction in lung injury.
BALF Cells: Treatment with DEP over a 5d period
caused an increase in total number of cells
(macrophages, neutrophils and lymphocytes) when
compared to control.
Total Cells: Control ¦ 5.33 ± 0.44 cells
1 mg/kg DEP ¦ 6.26±0.87 cells
10mg/kg DEP ¦ 14.40 ± 1.90 cells
25 mg/kg DEP ¦ 47.20 ±3.40 cells
COX-2 Expression: Exposure to DEP lead to a dose-
dependent increase in C0X-2 levels; specifically,
treatment with 25 mg/kg significantly increased
C0X-2 levels. This effect was completely reduced by
treatment with 5mg/kg of Dex.
Reference: Ahsan DEP: Obtained from Dr. Masaru Route: Intratrachael Instillation
et al. (2005,
156200)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male and
Female
Strains: hTrx-1-
transgenic and
C57BL/6 (control)
Aqe: 8-8.5wks
Sagai (Amori, Japan)
Particle Size: NR
Dose/Concentration: Lung Damage: 0.1
mg/mouse; Survival Analysis: 0.2 mg/mouse;
ESR: 0.05 mg/mouse
Time to Analysis: 24h
ESR: hTrx-1 induced 0.05 mg generation of hydroxyl
radicals in the lungs (mid thorax ESR spectra)
compared to control.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: hTrx-1
attenuated cellular damage from 0.1 mg DEP. Control
mice showed massive edema with neutrophilic
infiltration, hemorrhagic alveolar damage and
collapsed air spaces. hTrx-1 mice showed
mild/moderate edema with clear demarcation of air
spaces.
Viability: After 4,12 and 24 h, survival was 32, 24
and 12% respectively as compared to 80, 52 and
40% for hTrx-1 mice.
Reference: Andre
et al. (2006,
091376)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: BALB/cJ
Aqe: 10-12 wks
UFCP: Ultra Fine Carbon
Particles
(electric spark generator, Model
GFG 1000; Palas, Karlsruhe,
Germany)
Measured Component:
UFCP > 96% elemental carbon
Particle Size: 49nm
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 380//gfm:l
Time to Analysis: 4 and 24h; 0 and 24h post-
exposure
BALF Cells: A small increase in PMN number
suggests a minor inflammatory response after 24 h
exposure. Number of macrophages did not increase.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: Total protein
concentration significantly increased post 24 h
inhalation. Post 4h, heat shock proteins were
induced. Post 24 h, immunomodulatory proteins
(osteopontin, galectin-3 and lipocalin-2) significantly
increased in alveolar macrophages and septal cells.
236 (1.9%) genes was increased and 307 (2.5%)
genes were decreased with upregulated genes being
primarily related to the inflammatory process.
Reference:
Antonini et al.
(2004,097199)
Species: Rats
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley Weight:
— 250g
ROFA-P: Precipitator
¦S: Soluble (0.22/ym filter),
Components: Fe, Al, Ni, Ca,
Mg, Zn
¦I: insoluble, Components: Fe,
Al, Ni, Ca, Mg, Zn,V
¦T: total
R0FA-AH: Air Heater
¦S: Soluble (0.22/jm filter),
Components: Fe, V, Ni, AL
-I: Insoluble, Components: Fe,
V, Ni, AL
¦T: Total
Particle Size: mean diameter:
< 3/jm
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 1 mg/1 OOg bw in 300 //I
saline; 60mg/kg
Time to Analysis: 24h; Clearance Experiment:
two single exposures day 0 and 3 observed at
day 6, 8 and 10
ESR: Only ROFA-P contained free radicals, primarily
in R0FA-P-S.
BALF Cells: No effects on alveolar macrop
were observed, but all ROFA-P fractions increased
lung neutrophils. R0FA-P-S and R0FA-P-I effects
combined roughly equaled R0FA-P-T.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: ROFA-AH-T
and ROFA-AH-I increased LDH. ROFA-P and -AH
increased albumin for T and I fractions.
Pulmonary Clearance (Listeria Monocytogenes):
R0FA-P-T and ROFA-P-S significantly slowed
bacteria clearance from lungs. ROFA-AH and ROFA-P-
I had no effect.
July 2009 D-80 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Arimoto et al.
(2007,097973)
Species: Mouse
Strain: ICR
Gender: Male
Age: 6wks
Weight: 29-33g
DEP (collected using a 4JB1 4-
cyl, 2.74L Isuzu diesel engine)
DEP-OC: organic chemical
extracts
LPS
DL - DEP + LPS
DOL - DEP-OC + LPS
Particle Size: 0.4/ym
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: DEP or DEP-OC: 4mg/kg;
LPS: 2.5 mg/kg; DL or DOL: NR
Time to Analysis: 24h
Cytokines: DEP-OC or DEP alone did not change
levels of MIP-1a, MCP-1 or MIP-2. DL induced
significant increases in MIP-1, MIP-2 and MCP-1.
LPS: LPS and DOL induced increases in MCP-1
though the increase induced by DL was greater. No
effect on MIP-1 a or MIP-2 was observed.
Reference:
Bachoual et al.
(2007,155667)
Species: Mouse
Strain: C5B17
Gender: Male
Age: 7wks
Weight: 22.3 ±
0.73g
RER: PMio
Paris, France subway
CB
TiO?
DEP
Particle Size: RER: 79% <
0.5/ym; 20%: 0.5-1 fjm
CB: 95nm
Ti02: 150 fjm
DEP: NR
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 5, 50,100 //gfmouse,
0.22, 2.2, 4.5 mg/kg
Time to Analysis: 8 or 24h
BALF Cells: 100/yg RER and 100/yg DEP increased
total cell count and neutrophil influx after 8h and
returned to normal by 24 h. Smaller doses of RER
and DEP induced no effect. CB induced no effect.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: 100/yg RER
increased BALF protein after 8 h. No effect was
observed after 24 h nor with smaller doses of PM.
RER significantly increased MMP-12 mRNA level
after 8h and HO-1 total lung mRNA content. No
effects on MMP-2 or-9 or TIMP-1 or -2 expression
were observed. No effects from CB or DEP were
observed.
Cytokines: 100/yg RER increased BAL, TNF-a and
MIP-2 protein content after 8 h.
Reference: Becher Suspended PM: SRM-1648
et al. (2007, Particle Size: NR
097125)
Species: Mouse
Strain: CrlfWky
(iNOS(-M) and
C57BI/6,
Gender: Male
Age: 8-14wks
Weight: 25g
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 1.6 //cj/kincj: 64 mg/kg
Time to Analysis: 20h
Cytokines: In both wild and KO strains, all particles
caused increases of IL-6, MIP-2 and TNF-a levels.
NADPH-oxidase KO mice showed significantly lower
levels of IL-6 and MIP-2 responses to SPM compara-
tively to wildtype. iNOS KO mice showed
significantly reduced IL-6, TNF-a, MIP-2 responses
to SPM comparatively to wildtype.
Free Radicals: SPM induced significant increases in
free radical formation in alveolar type 2 cells but
could be inhibited by DPI.
Reference: Douglas Fir Wood Smoke
Bhattacharyya et (generated by burning wood at
al. (2004, 088095) 400nC in crucible oven)
Species: Mouse
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Weight: 200-250g
Particle Size: NR
Route: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 25gfmouse
Time to Analysis: Various exposure periods (0,
5,1 0,15, 20 min). Parameters measured after
24h recovery period.
Biochemical Parameters: Lipid peroxidation
increased after 20 min of woodsmoke inhalation as
did Myeloperoxidase at 20 min. No effects were
observed at other times or for total antioxidant
status, reduced or oxidized glutathione.
Antioxidant Enzyme Activities: No effect was
observed.
Histology: Dose-dependent damage progressing from
loss of cilia (5 min), degeneration of mucosal
epithelium, loss of mucosal epithelium to disrupted
mucosal epithelium with submucosal edema and
inflammation. Changes persisted for up to 4 days.
Reference: Cao et
al. (2007, 097491)
Species: Rat
Strain: SH and
WKY
Aqe: 12wks
PM2.6
(Thermo Anderson G-2.5
sampler, Shanghai, China)
Components: As, Cd, Cr, Cu,
Fe, Ni, Pb, Zn, V, Ba, Se, Mg,
Co, Mn
Particle Size: PM2.6
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 1.6, 8.0 and 40 mg/kg
Time to Analysis: Exposed 1fd for 3d,
sacrificed 24h following last exposure
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: LDH activity
and TBARs increased a in dose-dependent manner.
Notably, activity in SH rats was much higher than
WKY at the same dose exposed for each dose level.
BALF Cells: PM decreased macrophages and
increased neutrophils and lymphocytes in a dose-
dependent manner. For the same exposed dose, WKY
rats had a higher percentage than SH but a smaller
percentage of neutrophils and lymphocytes.
Cytokines: PM induced pro-inflammatory cytokine
release (IL-ip, TNF-a, CD44, MIP-2, TLR-4, OPN).
Again, SH cytokine level was greater than WKY at all
dose levels. PM induced anti-inflammatory cytokines
CC16 and HO-1 in a similar manner but at much
lower rate.
July 2009
D-81
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Carter
et al. (2006,
095936)
Species: Rat,
Mouse, Hamster
Gender: Female
Strain: F-344 (rat),
B6C3F1 (mouse),
Syrian Golden
(hamster)
Age: 7-10wks (all)
CB: Printex 90
Paritcle Size: primary size:
17nm; 1.2-1.6 /ym (aerosol
aerodynamic diameter)
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 1, 7, 50 mgfm3
Time to Analysis: 6hfday for 5dfwk for 13
wks; 1 d, 3m, 11 m post exposure
Superoxide: Levels rose in all species at 50mg dose.
Hamsters had no increase at 7 and 1mg doses. Mice
also increased at 7mg. Rats significantly increased at
all dose levels. Rats maintained elevation except for
the 50mg dose at 11 mo postexposure; it declined but
was still higher than control. Mice maintained
elevation at 50mg while 7 mg returned to control
levels by 3mo postexposure.
H202: At 50mg, increased levels in all species, with
the highest in rat, were observed. At 7mg, increased
levels in rats and mice were initially seen but levels
returned to baseline by 11 mo. Hamster levels were
not significant. At 1 mg, no significant changes were
observed.
NO: Induced similar reactions as H202. Rat response
continued through the study while mice and hamsters
returned to baseline by 11 mo postexposure. Rats
produced significantly higher levels at all times than
other species.
BALF Cells: CB induced significant increases in
neutrophils at 7 and 50mg for all species. Rats had
the highest and most prolonged PMN response. Mice
and hamsters had very similar reactions.
Cytokines: TNF-a, MIP-2 and IL-10 increased in a
dose-dependent manner in rats and mice. Hamsters
increased for IL-10 only. MIP-2 levels were highest in
rats. TNF-a level were similarl in all three species at
50mg, but hamsters started with a markedly higher
basal level.
Glutathione Peroxidase: Hamsters were the most
responsive with significant increases at all levels.
Rats and mice increased at 50mg and continued to
increase for up to 11 mo. Hamster levels declined
with time but continued to be higher than control.
Glutathione Reductase: Rats increased only at
50mg and remained elevated for up to 11 mo. Mice
increased at 7 and 50mg and remained elevated for
up to 11 mo. Hamsters increased at all levels at
11 mo, but at 50mg, levels only increased post 1 d.
Superoxide Dismutase: All species reacted in a
dose-dependent manner. Rats were the least
responsive. Rat SOD activity increased over time
while rat and mouse activity decreased at 50mg.
Data were consistent with cytokine data.
Summary: Rats appear to produce proinflammatory
responses while mice and hamsters produce
antiinflammatory responses.
Reference: Cassee
et al. (2005,
087962)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar
(SPFHsdCpb: WU)
and SH/NHsd
Age: 7 wks and 8-
12wks
CAPs: PM2.6
Netherland suburban, industrial
and freeway tunnel site
collections
Wistar rats pre-exposed to
ozone
SO4, NO:; and NH4 ions:
54±4% suburban, 53±7%
industrial and 35±5% freeway
site cone of total CAPS mass
Particle Size: PM2.6
(0.15 < PM < 2.5 //m)
Route: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: PM 365-3720//gfm3
(results from 16 different exposures 2000,
2002); O3: 1600 /yglm3 (0.8 ppm)
Time to Analysis: 8h O3 pre exposure; 6h CAPS
exposure; 48h post-exposure
BALF Cells: Wistar exhibited increased protein,
albumin, NAG and decreased ALP activity and
macrophage numbers. Wistar showed increased
PMNs due to ozone, but was not significantly
increased with additional CAPs exposure. SH showed
no effect of CAPS except for the increased PMNs.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: No effect on
AL, LDH, Glutathione, GSSG, GSH, Uric Acid was
observed.
Cytokines: No effect on IL-6, MIP-2 or TNF-a was
observed. CAPs induced an increase in CC16 plasma
of SH rats.
Hematology: CAPS induced an increase in RBC,
HGB and HCT of Wistar rats and fibrinogen of SH
rats.
Histology: Wistar and SH rats had no obvious lung
abnormalities. Small changes include increased
macrophages and cellularity of centriacinar septa of
ozone-only rats. Both ozone-only and ozone+CAPS
showed bronchial epithelium hypertrophy and
perivascular influx of PMNs.
BrdU Labeling Index of Terminal Bronchiolar
Epithelium: No CAPs effects were observed.
July 2009
D-82
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference Pollutant
Reference: Chang UFCB: Ultrafine CarbonBlack -
et al. (2005, Printex 90 (Degussa)
0977761 Particle Size: 14nm
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: ICR
Age: 5wks
Weight: 25-30g
Exposure
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 200//gf1 OOulfmouse
Time to Analysis: Parameters measured 4,16,
21,42h post single exposure
Effects
BALF Cells: Neutrophil number was at control level
at 4h, increased after 16h, peaked at 21 h and
returned to normal at 42h. No effect was observed
for the macrophage count.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: UfCB
increased total protein with peak at 21 h.
Cytokines: TNF-a increased at 4h and returned to
normal at 16h.
VEGF (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor|:
Increased at 4h and peaked at 16h but remained
elevated at 21 and 42h. VEGF and total protein in
BALF were correlated (R2 - 0.7352).
ROS: Pretreatment with NAC (ROS inhibitor)
decreased induction of BALF VEGF and total protein
by UfCB but did not fully block its effect.
Histology: Thickened alveolar walls in lungs of
UfCB-treated mice 16h post-IT was observed.
Reference: Chang
et al. (2007,
097475)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: ICR
Age: 5wks
Weight: 25-30g
UFCB: Ultrafine Carbon Black -
Printex 90 (Degussa)
Particle Size: 14nm diameter
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 200//gjmouse;
8mg/kg
Time to Analysis: Pretreatment with NAC (N-
acetylcysteine) ip 320 mg/kg, 2-h before UFCB
IT. Parameters measured 24h post exposure.
BALF Cells: Increased relative lung weight, total
protein (2 fold), total cells (11 fold) and number of
neutrophils were observed. BALF AM count was not
affected.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: Of the 33
identified proteins, the following 6 were confirmed
and validated: Cp (ceruluplasmin), albumin, EGFR,
LIFR (leukemia inhibitory factor receptor), a2M and
fB actin. All were increased following UFCB exposure.
The following were also identified: 3 membrane
proteins, 3 intracellular proteins, 10 protease
inhibitors and 6 antioxidants. UfCB increased LIFR
and EGFR in BALF. UfCB significantly reduced EGFR
and LIFR in lung homegenate. UfCB did not affect
EGFR protein but down-regulated LIFR in A549 cells
treated with UfCB.
Antioxidant: Pretreatment with NAC reduced the
intensity of albumin and a2M bands in BALF as well
as most other proteins.
Statistical analysis showed positive correlation
between VEGF and albumin (R2 - 0.796) and VEGF
and a2M (R2 - 0.7331) in BALF.
Reference: Cho et ROFA: Obtained from Power
al. (2005,156344) unit 4, Boston, MA
Species: Mouse Absent of LPS
Gender: Male Particle Size: NR
Strains: DBA/2J,
129P3/J,
C57BL/6J,
BALB/cJ, A/J,
C3H/HeJ,
C3H/He0uJ
Age: 6-8wks
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 6mg/kg bw (150/yg in
50//I/ 25g)
Time to Analysis: 24h; Additional HeJ and OuJ
mice: single: 1.5, 3 and 6h (compare TLR-
mediated molecular events)
BALF Cells: Significant genetic effects on number of
macrophages and PMNs after ROFA challenge. For
PMNs, DBA/2J, C57BL/6J, BALB/cJ, and 129P3/J
all induced increases significantly higher than
C3H/HeJ. For macrophages, only the A/J strain
induced increases significantly higher than
C57BL/6J. Total protein, PMNs and macrophages all
increased with HeOuJ inducing increases
significantly different from HeJ.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: Significant
genetic effect on mean total protein concentration
was observed. In decreasing order, DBA/2J, 129P3/J
and C57BL/6J all induced increases significantly
higher than C3H/HeJ.
TLR4 mRNA Expression: A significant decrease
was observed in TLR4 transcript level in HeJ- ROFA
exposed mice post 1,5h. Post 6h, TLR4 levels were
greater than the control levels. OuJ expression
increased beginning 1.5h post exposure.
TLR4 Protein Level: Protein level of OuJ mice
significantly exceeded (~ 2-3 fold) HeJ mice at 1.5,
3 and 6h.
Activation of Downstream Signal Molecules:
Greater activation of MYD88, TRAF6, IRAK-1, NF-
KB, MAPK, and AP-1 was observed in OuJ mice than
in HeJ mice before the development of ROFA-
induced pulmonary injury.
Cytokines: IL-1(3, LT (3, IL-1a, IL-7, IL-13, IL-16
increased in both strains (OuJ and HeJ). Levels of all
cytokines above were significantly higher in OuJ than
in HeJ.
July 2009
D-83
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Churg
et al. (2003,
087899)
Species: Human
Gender: Female
(Mexico City); Male,
Female (Vancouver)
Strain: -
Age: 66±9yrs
(Mexico City);
76 ± 11 yrs
(Vancouver)
Weight: NR
PM (Mexico City- high PM
region, Vancouver- low PM
region)
Particle Size: Geometric mean
size of individual particles in
tissue: 0.040-0.067/ym;
Aggregates in tissue: 0.34-0.54
fjm; Mexico City: 2.5,10/ym
Route: Ambient Air Exposure. Autopsy Tissue.
Dose/Concentration: 10- > 1000X106g dry
tissue; Mexico City: PMio: 66/yglm3, Vancouver:
PMio: 25/yg, PM2.6:15/yg
Time to Analysis: Lung samples taken from
deceased lifelong Mexico City residents and
Vancouver residents > 20yrs. Subjects were
never-smokers, did not work in dust occupations
or cook with biomass fuels.
The lungs from Mexico City residents showed
increased muscle and fibrous tissue in the
membranous bronchioles and respiratory bronchioles
compared to the Vancouver residents. Pigmented
dust, lumental distortion and carbonaceous
aggregates of UFPs were present in the Mexico City
lungs.
Reference: Costa
et al. (2006,
088438
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Age: 60d
ROFA
FP&L plant #6 oil, 1% sulfur
Particle Size: ~1.95/ym
Route: ITInstillation vs Nose-only Inhalation (
Dose/Concentration: IT -110/yg/rat
IH - 12 mg/m3
Time to Analysis: IT - single
IH - 6h
24,48, 96h
(histopath 24 and 48 only)
ROFA distribution: IH and IT resulted in equivocal
distribution (/yg/g lung tissue) in 5 different lung
lobes.
Airway Hyperactivity: IT resulted in doubled
airway hyperreactivity at 24 h which was sustained
for 96h. IH hyperreactivity did not reach statistically
significant level.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: IH and IT
showed very similar responses (R2 - 0.98). Time-
dependent increases were observed for protein and
LDH.
BALF Cells: Neutrophils peaked at 24 h and slowly
declined at 48 and 96h.
Lung Pathology: IT showed more alveolitis,
bronchial inflammatory and fibrinous fluid infiltrate.
IH showed relatively more congestion of small
airways and alveolar hemorrhage.
Reference:
Courtois et al.
(2008,156369)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar
Age: 12-14wks
Weight: NR
PM (SRM 1648; 63%
inorganic carbon, 4-7% organic
carbon, > 1 % mass fraction-
Si, S, A I, Fe, K, Na)
Carbon black (FW, P60)
UF, fine Ti02
Particle Size: PM mean
diameter: 0.4/ym; Carbon
black: FW- 13nm, P60- 21 nm;
Ti02 mean diameter: 0.14/ym
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 5mg PM or Tith
Time to Analysis: I.P injected then instilled. 6-
72h recovery period then killed and lungs
removed.
Particles were present in lung parenchyma that was
removed 12 and 72h post instillation. The Ach
relaxation response significantly decreased in the
12h recovery period group but not in the other
groups. Fine Ti02 did not alter Ach relaxation.
Reference: Dick et
al. (2003, 036605)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: CD1
Age: 8-10wks
Weight: 20-25g
CO: PM Coarse
Fl: PM Fine
FU: PM ultrafine
PM collected in RTP, NC
Particle Size: CO: 3.5 - 20
//m; Fl: 1.7- 3.5/ym;FU: <1.7
fj m
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 10 /yg, 50 /yg, 100
/yg/mouse; 0.5, 2.5, 5.0mg/kg
Time to Analysis: DMTU 500 mg/kg bw 30 min
pre exposure for some mice. Parameters
measured 18h post-exposure.
Particle Characteristics: S increased (CO-
33.20/yg/mg, Fl- 49.44/yg/mg FU- 122.79/yg/mg)
with decreasing particle size (mostly in the water-
soluble fraction). Fe and Cu higher in coarse and fine
fractions (mostly present in the insoluble). CO PM
contained more nickel (in both soluble and insoluble)
than Fl or FU particles. Also, endotoxin levels similar
in CO and Fl; much lower in FU (0.165 EU/mg).
BALF Cells: PMN increased with exposure for all 3
fractions except 100 /yg Fl.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: Albumin
increased only at 100 /yg Fl. No differences in NAG
or LDH observed.
Cytokines: IL-6 increased at 100 /yg dose for all 3
fractions with similar responses. TNF-a increased a
100 /yg dose of fine PM vs control.
Effect of PM After Pre-treatment w/ DMTU:
Systemic administration of DMTU alone depicted a
two-fold increase in total antioxidant capacity.
DMTU halved neutrophil response observed with
PMs alone: No fractions were increased over DMTU
alone which was at least two-fold saline control. IL-6
concentrations were drastically reduced in the DMTU
group for the mice exposed to coarse particles (all
fractions were reduced but only coarse had a
significant response). TNF-a levels were decreased
after treatment with particles and DMTU but
treatment with particles and saline (control)
produced similar results.
July 2009 D-84 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Dybdahl et al.
(2004,089013)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: BALB/CJ or
transgenic
(MutaMouse)
Age: 9-10wks
Weight: — 20g
DEP: SRM 1650 (NIST)
Particle Size: DEP: NR;
Control: PM 0.13 fjm diameter
Route: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: I: 20 & 80 mgfm3
II: 5 & 20 mgfm3
Time to Analysis: I: single exposure 90min; II:
90 min/day for 4d; I & II: parameters measured
1, 3, or 22h post exposure
Cytokines: A single 90-min DEP exposure increased
IL-6 gene level dose-dependently in the lung. For 80
mgfm3 DEP, significantly higher IL-6 gene level was
observed, both 1 and 22h post exposure. For 20
mg/m3 DEP, a significantly higher IL-6 level was
observed at 1 h post exposure but normalized at 3h.
BALF Cells: Inhalation of DEP did not decrease
viability of BAL cells (see Tablel). For mice exposed
to 20 mg/m3 DEP, at 1 h post exposure in BAL fluid
there was 3 fold increase in total cell number.
DNA Damage: Level of 8-oxodG increased post
single exposure with 80 mgfm3 inducing levels
significantly higher than controls. Repeated
exposures were associated with significantly higher
DNA strand breaks.
Reference: Elder et
al. (2004, 055642)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Fisher344,
SH
Age: 23m (Fisher),
11 -14m (SH)
UFP: argon-filled chamber with
electric arc discharge (TSI, Inc.,
St. Paul, MN)
Particle Size: 36nm
Route: Whole-body Inhalation. Intraperitoneal
(ip) for saline and LPS
Dose/Concentration: UFP: 150/yg/m3 bw; LPS:
2 mg/kg
Time to Analysis: Parameters measured post
single exposure of 6h, 18h
BALF Cells: Neither inhaled UFP nor LPS cause a
significant increase in BAL fluid total cells or
percentage of neutrophils in either rat strain. No
significant exposure-related alteration in total protein
concentration was observed. In both rat strains LPS
induced a significant increase in the amount of
circulating PMNs. When combined with inhaled UFP,
PMNs decreased: for F-344 rats, this decrease was
significant.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: Plasma
fibrinogen increased with LPS in both rat strains with
the magnitude of change greater in SH rats. UFP
alone decreased plasma fibrinogen in SH rats.
Combined UFP and LPS response was blunted but
significantly higher than controls. Hematocrit was
not altered in either rat strain by any treatment. No
change in activites of LDH and b-glucuronidase was
observed.
TAT complexes: With all exposure groups averaged,
plasma TAT complexes in SH rats were 6.5 times
higher than in F-344 rats. LPS caused an overall
increase in TAT complexes for F-344 rats which was
further augmented by inhaled UFP. UFP alone
induced a decreased response. In SH rats, UFP alone
exhibited a significantly increased response and LPS
exhibited a decreased response.
ROS in BALF: In F-344 rats, both UFP and LPS have
independent and significant effects on DCFD
oxidation. Effects were in opposite directions;
particles decreased ROS whereas LPS increased
ROS.
Reference: Elder et
al. (2004, 087354)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: F344
Age: 21m
Freshly generated vehicle
exhaust emissions from I-90
between Rochester and
Buffalo, NY
Particle Size: NR
Route: Whole-body Inhalation; (IT Instillation:
Influenza)
Dose/Concentration: Vehicle exhaust: 0.95-
3.13 x 106 particles/cm3
Endotoxin: 84 EU
Influenza (IV): 10, 000 EID 50 in 250ul
Time to Analysis: 1x6h, 3x6h or both.
Parameters measured 18h post-exposure. 48h
prior to on-road exposures, instilled
intratracheally with IV. Immediate pre exposure
of priming agent endotoxin.
EXPERIMENTS
1: LPS + PM 6h
2: LPS + PM 6h, 3 x 6h
3: IV + PM 6 h
4: IV + PM 6h, 3x 6 h
No departures from normal baseline cellular or
biochemical values were observed, suggesting that
on-road exposures were well tolerated by the rats.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: Increase in
total protein concentration, LDH and B-glucuronidase
activities were observed.
Specific results according to groups 1-4 are as
follows:
Experiment 1: No endpoints revealed significant
differences between groups of rats exposed to gas
phase only versus the gas-phase/particle mixture.
Experiment 2: Combination of endotoxin and
particles produced greater inflammatory responses
than those treated with saline and particles post 1 d.
After 3 days, no statistically significant changes
were noted.
Experiment 3: Influenza virus significantly increased
ROS release in BAL cells.
Experiment 4: Influenza virus significantly increased
both percentage of PMNs in lavage fluid and BAL cell
ROS release.
July 2009 D-85 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Elder et
al. (2005, 088194)
Species: Rat,
Mouse, Syrian
Golden Hamster
Gender: Female
Strain: F-344,
B6C3F1, FIB
HSCb: Printex-90 high surface
area carbon black, Deguss-
Huels (Trostberg, Germany).
LSCb: Sterling V, low surface
area carbon black, Cabot
(Boston, MA)
Particle Size: HSCb - 14nm,
LSCb - 70nm
Reference: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 0,1, 7, 50 mgfm3 HSCb;
50 mg/m3 LSCb (rats only)
Time to Analysis: 6 h/d, 5 dfwk for 13wks.
Parameters measured 1 d, 3mo, 11 mo post-
exposure
Body Weight: Environmental changes pre and post-
exposure affected test subjects' life spans,
particularly hamsters. Hamsters also experienced
significant loss of body weight when exposed to high
doses of HSCb.
Effects of Carbon Black: In rats, lung weight of the
high dose HSCb doubled. After 11 mo, analysis of all
lungs showed no significant difference. Mice had the
highest relative lung burdens at the end of exposure
time but also cleared particles faster at high doses
than rats. However, clearance slowed over the 11 mo
recovery period, especially in high dose mice.
Hamsters showed significant elevations in lung
carbon black burden for all exposures at all time
points. Hamsters exposed to high dose HSCb
exhibited impaired clearance.
BALF Cells: Presence of PMNs was limited to the
mid and high dose groups. Overall maximal response
was reached in mice and hamsters, but not in rats
with increasing mass dose of HSCb.
Reference: Evans
et al. (2006,
097066)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
DEP: collected under dry,
outdoor, ambient conditions
from tractor exhaust pipe
(1985, Japanese ISEK11500
cc tractor) burning Esso 2000
diesel and 20130 mixture of
Esso light engine oil.
10% UF, 90% fine
Cabosil: amorphous silicon
dioxide
16% UF, 84% fine
Particle Size: DEP: 30nm;
Cabosil: 7nm
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 1 mg/rat DEP; 1 mg/rat
Cabosil
Time to Analysis: Pretreatment with 0.5 unit
of bleomycin; IT 3 or 7d after pre treatment;
1wk post-IT
Lung permeability: In bleomycin-treated group,
obvious inflammatory status and edema within the
lung was observed. This was shown by significant
increases in acellular protein and free cells.
Changes in lung: Body weight ratio, lung surface
protein content, free cell counts, and apical surface
protein of rat type I cells were only altered by
bleomycin treatment and not particle exposure.
Reference:
Finnerty et al.
(2007,156434)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: C57BL/61
Age: 12 wks
Weight: 24.3
±0.3g
Coal Fly Ash (generated at U.S
EPA National Risk Management
Research Laboratory by burning
Montana subbituminous coal
under conditions simulating full-
scale utility boiler conditions)
Transition metals of Coal Fly
Ash: Fe, Mg, Ti, Mn, V
Particle Size: >PM2 b
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: PM: 200mg PMfmouse;
9.1 mg/kg
PM+LPS10: 200mg PM + 10mg LPS
PM+LPS100: 200mg PM + 100mg LPS
LPS: 100 /yg
Time to Analysis: Parameters measured 18h
post single exposure
BALF Cells: No significant differences in |
concentration or white blood cell count in any groups
were observed. The percentage of neutrophils in-
creased significantly with PM+LPS100. PMN rose in
PM groups and increased further with LPS
treatment. Increases in PM+LPS were groups
statistically significant. More leukocytes were
present in the alveolar space in PM+LPS10
compared to the PM group. The most severe
response was in the PM+LPS100 group.
Cytokines: Plasma TNF-a and IL-6 significantly
increased for the PM+LPS100 group. An additive
effect of LPS and PM for IL-6 was observed. For
saline and PM groups, pulmonary TNF-a was below
detection range. A synergistic effect for TNF-a was
observed. A less than additive effect for IL-6 was
observed. Pulmonary TNF-a significantly increased in
the PM+ LPS100 group. Pulmonary IL-6 significantly
increased in both PM+LPS groups.
Reference:
Fujimaki et al.
(2006,096601)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: IL-6(-/-) and
WT: B6J129Sv
(control)
Age: 5-6wks
DEP: collected from a 4-
cylinder, 2.74 L, Isuzu diesel
engine
Particle Size: 0.4 /jm
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 1.0, 3.0 mgfm3
Time to Analysis: 12 h/d for 4wks. Parameters
measured 1d post-exposure
BALF Cells: Treatment significantly increased BAL
cells from WT mice at both dose levels. The increase
of macrophages and neutrophils were dose-
dependent. An increase in lymphocytes were present
in WT mice with the low dose. No significant
increase in cells were observed from IL-6 (¦/¦).
Cytokines: TNF-a largely increased in IL-6(-/-) mice
exposed to 3 mg/m3 compared to WT mice. IL-6
production increased in WT mice exposed to 3
mg/m3. CCL3 increased in both WT and IL-6(-/-) at
high dose. IL-1 (3 remained at the control level.
July 2009 D-86 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Gerlofs-Nijland et
al. (2005, 088652)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SH/NHsd
Age: 11-12wks
Weight: 250-350g
RTD: road tunnel dust
(obtained from a Motorway
tunnel in Hendrik-ldo-Ambacht,
Netherlands)
EHC-93
(Ottawa, Canada)
Particle Size: Coarse: 2.5 - 10
fjm; fine: 0.1- 2.5 /jm
Route:IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 0.3,1, 3,10 mg/kg
EHC-93 10 mg/kg
Time to Analysis: Parameters measured
4, 24, 48h post single exposure
BALF Cells: PMN significantly increased in RTD (3
and 10 mg/kg dose) and EHC-93 exposed animals at
24 h and decreased by 48h but remained statistically
significant. AM numbers decreased for 3 mg/kg RTD
group at 4h.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: Myelop-
eroxidase (measured at 24 h in 1, 3,10 mg/kg RTD
groups) was elevated in a dose-dependent manner.
RTD induced time-dependent increases in LDH
activity at 24 and 48h, although these increases
were less than EHC-93 values at the same time
points. Alkaline phosphatase increased dose-
dependently for RTD at 48h. GSH decreased at 24 h
to approximately the same levels in 0.3,1, and 3
mg/kg RTD dose groups. Uric acid only decreased in
1 mg/kg RTD group at 24 h.
Cytokines: IL-6 levels were elevated only at 10
mg/kg for RTD and EHC-93 at 4 and 24 h; it
remained elevated for EHC-93 at 48h. A dose-
dependent increase in TNF-a at 4h for RTD was
observed. TNF-a levels remained elevated only for
the 10 mg/kg groups at 24 h and returned to control
levels by 48h. A dose-dependent increase in MIP-2
for all RTD dose groups were observed and remained
elevated through 48h for both PM types (although
values were returning to control levels).
Hematology: No significant changes in plasma for
bigET-1 or von Willebrand factor were observed. At
the highest dose, fibrinogen levels significantly
increased at 24 and 48h for both PM types.
Pulmonary histopathology: A dose-dependent
increase in the number of inflammatory foci at 24
and 48h for 3 and 10 mg/kg RTD groups was
observed. The response was even greater for the
EHC-93 exposed group at similar time points.
July 2009
D-87
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Gerlofs-Nijland et
al. (2007, 097840)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SH/NHsd
Age: 13wks
Weight: 250-350g
PM samples collected from:
1. MOB high traffic density
2. HIA high traffic density
3. ROM high traffic density
4. DOR moderate traffic
density
5 MGH low traffic density
6 LYC low traffic density
Particle Size: Ooarse: 2.5-10
fjm; Fine: 0.1 ¦ 2.5 fjm
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 3,10mg/kg
Time to Analysis: 24h
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: LDH was
significantly increased for all doses of coarse PM and
for the high dose of fine PM. BALF protein
concentration was observed predominantly at the
high dose of coarse PM. Location ROM had evidence
of attenuated responses with fine PM. Ascorbate
concentrations were reduced but were only
significant for rats exposed to the highest dose of
coarse PM fractions from the locations MOD, HIA,
and LYC.
BALF Cells: Pulmonary inflammation was induced in
a significant and dose-dependent manner for both
dose levels. Inflammation in the BALF included
airway neutrophilia, increased macrophage numbers
and mild lymphocytosis. Both coarse and fine PM
caused dose-dependent aveolitis. Fine PM from LYO
(1 Omg/kg dose) also caused some bronchiolitis.
Cytokines: TNF-a concentrations increased for all
coarse samples with the exception of DOR and LYC.
Fine PM induced similar responses for all sites. MIIP-
2 concentrations increased only at certain sites for
coarse but not fine PM.
Hematology: Fibrinogen responses of SH rats
increased significantly at the high dose of both
fractions of all PM samples, except fine PM from
DOR.
Location-related differences: Coarse PM from
MOB, HIA and MGH induced higher LDH responses
than other locations. Coarse PM from HIA produced
BALF protein concentrations higher than LYC and
ROM. MGH induced greater amounts of BALF protein
than ROM. Coarse PM from LYC lowered fibrinogen
values more than PM from location MOB, HIA, and
MGH. Fine PM showed less differences among the
various sites.
Particle Correlation: Fine PM exhibited significant
correlation between zinc content and BALF
cytotoxicity markers protein and LDH - mainly from
HIA. Fine PM also exhibited positive correlations with
copper and barium. Coarse PM showed positive
correlation with barium and copper, mainly from
MOB.
Reference:
Gerlofs-Nijland et
al. (2009,190353)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SH
Age: 12wks
Weight: 200-300g
PM (Prague, Czech Republic;
Duisburg, Germany; Barcelona,
Spain) (Prague and Barcelona
coarse PM organic extracts)
Particle Size: Coarse: 2.5-10
fjm, Fine: 0.2-2.5/ym
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 7mg PM/kg body weight
Time to Analysis: DTPA added to some PM
samples preinstillation. Instilled with PM.
Necropsy 24h postexposure.
Inflammation (LDH, protein, albumin), cytotoxicity
(NAG, MPO, TNF-a), and fibrinogen were increased
by PM, and were greatest in the coarse PM fraction.
Metal-rich PM had greater inflammatory and
cytotoxic effects, and increased fibrinogen and vWF
and decreased ACE. PAH content influenced greater
inflammation (including neutrophils), cytotoxicity, and
fibrinogen. Generally, whole PM and coarse PM were
more potent than organic extracts and fine PM,
respectively.
Reference: Ghio et
al. (2005, 088272)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: N8 b/b
Belgrade rats and
N8+ lb Belgrade
controls
Oil Fly Ash (Southern Research
Institute, Birmingham, AL)
Particle Size: 1.95 ± 0.18
/jm (MMAD)
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 500//g/rat; 2mg/kg
Time to Analysis: 24h
BALF Cells: Homozygous Belgrade with mutation
G185R had higher levels of Fe and V 24 h post-
exposure. This may demonstrate a decreased ability
to remove Fe and V from the lower respiratory tract
than heterozygous +lb littermates. This also
indicates that DMT1 is normally responsible for at
least some Fe and V uptake; thus, a defective DMT1
transports less.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: Increased
protein and LDH concentrations in the homozygous
strain were observed when compared to control
July 2009
D-88
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference Pollutant
Reference: Ghio et Ferric ammonium citrate (FAC)
al. (2005, 088275) Vanady| su|fate (V0Sq4)
Species: Rat Particle Size: NR
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Age: 60d
Weight: 250-300g
Exposure
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 0.5 mL 100//m FAC/rat;
0.5 mL 10 fjm V0S04/rat; 500 /yg oil fly ash; 2
mg/kg
Time to Analysis: Single or double exposure
with 24 h rest period. Parameters measured 15,
30, 60 min, 24h post exposure.
Effects
DMT1 immunohistochemistry and lung injury:
FAC increased and V0S04 decreased -IRE DMT 1
staining. Same exposures had no effect on +IRE
DMT1. -IRE DMT1 expression in macrophages,
airway and alveolar epithelial cells increased with
increased Fe exposure. Vanadium nearly eliminated
staining except in alveolar macrophages. Increased
metal clearance with pre exposure to FAC. Less
metal clearance with pre exposure to VOSO4. Pre-
exposure to iron diminished lung injury whereas pre-
exposure to vandium increased lung injury after oil fly
ash instillation. Lung injury measured by
concentration of protein and LDH in BAL.
Reference: Gilmour
et al. (2007,
096433)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: BALB/c
Age: 10-12wks
Weight: 20-22g
PM-C0, Fl, UF
(obtained from U.S. Seattle (S),
Salt Lake City (SL), South
Bronx (SB), Sterling Forest
(SF))
SB: included 35% sulfate, 22%
gasoline, diesel and brake
wear.
SF: 48% sulfate.
SL: 34% wood combustion and
28% sulfate
S: 39% wood combustion and
29% sulfate
Residual oil combustion and soil
dust less than 5% for all sites.
Particle Size: CO: 2.5-10/ym;
Fl: ~ 2.5/jm; UF: ~ 0.1/ym
Route: Oropharyngeal Aspiration
Dose/Concentration: 25//g or 100/yg PM; 1.25
or 5 mg/kg
Time to Analysis: 18h
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: Seattle CO
fractions showed no dose-dependent effect on
protein concentration. Results for other locations
were distinctly higher with 100 /yg dose than 25 /yg
and saline doses. SL CO high dose induced the most
significant increase. LDH response was weakly dose-
related. Only SB showed a statistically significant
increase for LDH with the high dose UF.
BALF Cells: PMN increased with the high dose of
CO samples from SB, SL, S, but not SF. No
significant increases from Fl were observed, though
the high dose induced increased PMN. UF from SL
caused a highly variable response.
Cytokines: MIP-2 was similar to PMN response. SB
CO induced the most significant response. SL UF was
highly variable.
Particle Characteristics: LPS was higher in S (CO,
Fl, UF) and SL (CO, Fl, UF). Zn levels were highest in
SB (CO, Fl, UF). Fe was higher in all CO and Fl
samples with SB CO inducing the highest.
Reference:
Gilmour et al.
(2004, 057420)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: CD1
Age: 8-10wks
Weight: 20-25g
Coal Fly Ash
MU: Montana Ultrafine
MF: Montana Fine
MC: Montana Coarse
KF: W.Kentucky Fine
KC: W. Kentucky Coarse
Particle Characteristics:
Montana Sulfur 0.83%, Ash
11.72%. Trace amounts of Be
P, Sr, V, Nb, Cd, Se, Ga, Cu.
Depleted in Si, Al, Fe, Mg, Ti.
Kentucky Sulfur 3.11 %, Ash
8.07%
Particle Size: Coarse:
fj m;
Fine: <2.5//m;
Ultrafine: < 0.2 fjm
Route: Oropharyngeal Aspiration
Dose/Concentration: 25ug or 100//gfmouse
Time to Analysis: 18h
>2.5
BALF Cells: PMN highly increased for MU at both
doses. The level was comparable to the positive
control. PMN also increased with KF at high dose.
Coarse particles caused no significant increase in
PMN. Number of macrophages did not change, but
NAG increased significantly with MU for both dose
levels and with KF and MF at high dose level.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: Total protein
and LDH was not significantly elevated. Albumin
concentration increased significantly after treatment
with the fine high dose of both particle types.
Cytokines: MU particles caused a significant
increase in TNF-a. MIP-2 increased in all fine and
ultrafine PM-instilled animals with the highest in the
MU and KF at both doses. IL-6 was detectable only
in the BALF of MU and KF with substantial
variability. The IL-6 levels were not significant.
July 2009
D-89
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Gilmour PM (collected from precipitator
et al. (2004,
087948)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SH/NQIBR,
WKY
Age: 12wks
Weight: 280-340g
unit of an oil burning power
plant in Boston)
Measured Components of PM:
S, Zn, Ni, V, Al, Cu, Pb, Fe, Ca,
Na, K, Mg, Endotoxin
Particle Size: NR
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 0.0, 0.83, 3.3, and 8.3
mg/kg in SH rats; 0.0 or 3.3 mg/kg in WKY and
SH rats
Time to Analysis: 24h
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: LDH activity
increased in a dose-related manner; this was
observed in SH rats after exposure to 0.83, 3.33 and
8.3 mg/kg PM. SH rats showed greater lung
permeability following PM exposure than WKY rats.
SH rats showed acute lung inflammatory response
after exposure to PM when compared to WKY rats.
BALF Cells: No increase in macrophage number was
observed in either rat strain following saline or PM
exposure at 24 h.
Cytokines: MIP2 mRNA expression increased
significantly in SH PM exposure group only. No
significant differences in TNF-a RNA expression in
either WKY, SH rats or control treatment groups
were observed.
CD14: A significant increase in lung CD14 protein
was observed only in SH rats exposed to PM.
TLR4: A significant increase in TLR4 protein in SH
rats exposed to PM was observed.
NF-kB: A significant increase in NF-kB binding
protein in the nuclei of SH rats exposed to PM was
observed. This effect was not observed in the control
of PM-exposed WKY rats.
Reference: Gilmour ufCB: Ultrafine carbon black
et al. (2004,
054175)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar
Age: 12wks
(Printex 90 (Degussa)
CB: (Huber 990, HR. Haeffner
and Co)
Particle Size: ufCB: 14nm;
CB: 260nm (primary particle
diameter)
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: ufCB: 1.66 mgfm3
fCB: 1.40 mgfm3
Number concentrations
ufCB: 52380 particles/cm3
fCB: 3800 particles/cm3
Time to Analysis: Exposed for 7 h. Sacrificed
0,16 or 48h post exposure.
BAL Cells: Total number of cells increased
significantly in UfCB-exposed rats at 0 and 16 h.
Recruitment of cells did not occur in response to CB
exposure. PMNs increased significantly in the BALF
of ufCB-exposed rats at 16 h. Leukocytes remained
unchanged following CB exposure but increased
significantly at 0 and 48 h post exposure to ufCB.
Cytokine mRNA: A significant increase in BALF
MIP-2 mRNA expression was observed at 48 h. No
differences in MIP-2 mRNA levels were observed in
the whole lung tissue.
Reference:
Godleski et al.
(2002,156478)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SD
Age: NR
Weight: 200-250g
CAPs (Boston; Harvard
Ambient Particle Concentrator)
Particle Size: 0.27±2.3/jm
(diameter)
Route: Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 73.5-733//gfm3
Time to Analysis: Exposed 5hfd, 3d
(consecutive). BAL 24h postexposure
PMNs significantly increased with CAPs exposure
and also in relation to CAPs mass, Br, SO42', EC, 0C
and Pb. An overall increase in pro-inflammatory
mediators and decrease in immune enhancer and
evidence of vascular endothelial responses occurred
with CAPs exposure.
Reference:
Gottipolu et al.
(2009,190360)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar
Kyoto (WKY), SH
Age: 14-16wks
Weight: NR
DE (30-kW (40hp) 4-cylinder
indirect injection Deutz diesel
engine) (02- 20%, CO-1.3-
4.8ppm, NO- <2.5-5.9ppm,
NO?- < 0.25-1,2ppm, S02- 0.2-
0.3ppm, OC/EC- 0.3±0.03)
Particle Size: Number Median
Diameter: Low- 83±2nm, High-
88.2nm; Volume Median
Diameter: Low- 207 ±2nm,
High- 225±2nm
Route: Exposure Chamber
Dose/Concentration: Low- 507 ±4/yg/m3, High-
2201 ±14 //g/m3
Time to Analysis: Exposed 4hfd, 5dfwk, 4wks.
Necropsied 1d postexposure.
DE increased neutrophils in a concentration-
dependent manner, and GGT activity at the high
dose. Particle-laden macrophages were found in DE-
exposed rats. DE dose-dependently inhibited
mitochondrial aconitase activity. DE caused 377
genes to be differentially expressed within WKY rats,
most of which were downregulated, but none in SH
rats. However, WKY rats had an expression pattern
shift that mimicked baseline expression of SH rats
without DE. These genes regulated compensatory
response, matrix metabolism, mitochondrial function,
and oxidative stress response.
Reference:
Gunnison and Chen
(2005, 087956)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: DK (ApoE
LDLr'1')
Age: 18-20wks
CAPS
(Northeastern regional back-
ground)
Ambient air copollutants
measured O3, NO?
Particle Size: 389 ± 211 m
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: CAPS — 131 ± 99//g/m3
including O3 - 10 ppb and NO2 - 4.4 ppb
Time to Analysis: 6h/d, 5d/wk for 4m (5/12/03-
9/5/03). Sacrified 3-4d post exposure.
Microarray Data: 13 genes in the heart tissue and
47 genes in the lung tissue were identified as
possibly affected. Strict standards (1.5 fold
response, 10 % false discovery rate) resulted in
responses by only 1/13 genes (Rex3 - no known
heart physiology) in the heart tissue and 0/47 genes
in the lung tissue. Using more liberal response
(nonstatistical) standards (1.5 fold only) and
comparison of each CAPS animal with all 3 control
animals (3x3 array) resulted in possible effects on 7
additional genes in the heart tissue and 37 genes in
the lung tissue.
July 2009 D-90 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Gurgueira et al.
(2002, 036535)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Weight: 250-300g
CAPs
(Harvard Ambient Particle
Concentrator)
CB
(C198 Fischer Scientific, Pitts-
burg, PA USA)
Composed of 85.9± 0.2%
Carbon, 13.0± 0.2% 02,
1.17± 0.2% Sulfur
ROFA
(Boston, MA USA oil-fired
power plant)
Particle Size: CAPs: 1-2.5
/jm; CB: < 2.5/jm; ROFA:
< 2.5 /jm
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 300 ± 60 //gfm3
Time to Analysis: 1, 3, 5h CAPs Exposure
followed by immediate post-exposure analysis.
5h CB, immediate analysis.
30min ROFA, Immediate analysis.
In situ Chemiluminescence(CL): Data show a
significant increase in lung and heart CL at 5h. Lung
CL increased linearly with time of exposure.
Oxidants: CAPs-initiated oxidative stress was not
detectable in those rats allowed to recover in room
air after the simulated "peak" in particulate air
pollution. Rats breathing particle-free filtered air for
3 days had significantly lower levels of oxidants.
Exposure to inert CB did not exert oxidant effects on
the heart and lung.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: The water
content of the lung and heart increased significantly
upon exposure to CAPs but not to filtered air and
increased as a function of length of exposure. Rats
breathing CAPs also showed increases in LDH and
CPK as a function of length of exposure.
Antioxidant enzymes: Data showed an increase in
SOD and catalase activities in both the lung and
heart. The pattern of increase was tissue specific.
Reference: Hamoir PSC: Polystyrene particles, Route: IT Instillation
et al. (2003,
096664)
Species: Rabbit
Strain: New
Zealand
Age: 12-16 wks
Weight: 2.8 ±
0.5kg
Carboxylate modified, 3 types
PSA: Polystyrene particles,
Amine modified, 1 type
Particle Size: PSC: 24,110 or
190nm (PSC24, PSC 110,
PSC190); PSA: 190nm
Dose/Concentration: PSC24: 0.04 or 4
mg/rabbit
PSC110, PSC190, PSA190: 4mgfrabbit
Time to Analysis: 0, 30, 60, 90,120min
Capillary Filtration Coefficient: A time-c
increase correlating to total number of
particles/surface area, not particle size, was
observed.PSA induced a significant increase in mi-
crovascular permeability as compared to PSC. This
suggests that the number of particles exposed should
be considered an important parameter for measuring
air quality rather than total particle surface area.
July 2009 D-91 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Happo
et al. (2007,
096630)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: C57BL/6J
Weight: 19-30g
Age: 10-11 wks
PMC (Coarse)
PMF (Fine)
PMUF (Ultrafine)
Collected in 6 European cities:
Duisburg, Prague, Amsterdam,
Helsinki, Barcelona, Athens
Particle Size: PMC: PMio2.5;
PMF: PM2.B.0.2: PMUF: PM0.2
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: PMC: 5.9-29.6//g/m3;
PMF: 8.3-25.2//g/m3; PMUF: 2.7-6.7 //g/m3
Dose-response: 1, 3,10mg/kg
Time course: 10 mg/kg
Time to Analysis: 1. Dose-Response study:
parameters measured 24h post exposure. 2.
Time course study: parameters measured 4,12,
24 h post single exposure (at 10 mg/kg).
Total Cell Numbers: 1. For the dose-response
study, all the PMC samples exhibited dose-dependent
increases of total cell numbers. The 3 and 10 mg/kg
doses of PMC induced statistically significant
increases. At 10 mg/kg, only 2/6 samples induced
statistically significant increases. No PMUF samples
induced effects at any dose. 2. For the time-response
study, no increases in cell numbers were shown at 4
h. Though the levels induced by PMC at 24 h were
lower than at 12 h, both levels were statistically
significant. PMF induced statistically significant
increases only at 12 h for 4/6 samples. PMUF
induced only 1 significant increase at 12 h; the 24 h
time point was not tested.
Total Protein/LDH: 1. The lower doses of 1 and 3
mg/kg did not induce significant increases in any of
the PM samples, except for PMUF-Athens. All 6
samples of PMC, at 10 mg/kg, induced significant
increases. At 10 mg/kg, 4/6 PMF samples induced
significant increases. 2. At 4 h, none of the samples
increased protein concentration. The PMC samples,
excluding Prague, induced significantly higher
concentrations at 12 h. At 24 h, only 3/6 PMC
samples induced significant increases. Only 2 PMF
samples induced significant increases at 12 and 24
h. At 12 h, effects induced by PMUF were minimal
and inconsistent: the 24 h time point was not tested.
Cytokine: 1. Only PMC induced dose-dependent
responses that reached statistical significance at 10
mg/kg. PMF and PMUF induced minimal and
inconsistent responses.
TNF-a levels: 2. TNF-a levels increased
significantly at 4 and 12 h by PMC. At 24 h, TNF-a
levels returned to near control levels. PMF, at 4 h,
induced statistically significant increases for 3/6
samples and significant increases in 2/6 samples at
12 h. No PMUF samples significantly increased TNF-
a levels.
IL-6: 2. PMC induced the highest IL-6 levels at 4 h.
Levels at 12 and 24 h were reduced with 6/6 and 3/6
samples showing statistically significant increases,
respectively. PMF showed a similar trend with 4 h
inducing the highest levels that were reduced at 12
and 24 h. Of the PMUF samples, only the Helsinki
and Duisburg samples induced statistically significant
results at 4 and 12 h. Generally, the PMUF responses
were negligible when compared to PMC and PMF.
KC production: 2. All PMC samples induced the
highest levels at 4 h. At 12 and 24 h, levels were
reduced but 4/6 samples induced statistically
significant levels. PMF showed a similar trend- the
highest levels were induced at 4 h (in 3/6 samples).
PMUF at 4 h showed small, though not significant,
increases. At 12 h, only 2 samples showed
statistically significant differences from the control:
the 24 h time point was not tested.
Reference: Harder Carbon UFP
et al. (2005,
087371)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar
Kyoto
Age: 14-17wks
Weight: NR
Particle Size: Diameter:
37.6±0.7nm
Route: Exposure Chamber
Dose/Concentration: 180/yg/m3
Time to Analysis: Telemeter implanted into
peritoneal cavity. 10d recovery. 3d baseline
reading. 24h exposure. 3d recovery.
Carbon UFP mildly but significantly elevated HR
compared to the control. SDNN was significantly
decreased during exposure. UFP induced mild
pulmonary inflammation, significantly increased
PMN, and increased the total protein and albumin
concentrations. Particle-laden macrophages
sporadically accumulated in the alveolar region.
July 2009 D-92 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Harkema et al.
(2004, 056842)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: F344, BN
Age: 10-12wks
Weight: NR
CAPs (Detroit; July-Sept.
2000; Harvard Ambient Fine
Particle Concentrator)
Particle Size: 2.5 /jm
(diameter)
Route: Inhalation Exposure Chamber. IT
Instillation.
Dose/Concentration: 4d concentration:
676±288//g/m3, 5d concentration: 313±119
/yg/m3, July concentration: 16-185 //g|m3,
September concentration: 81 -755/yglm3; IT
Instillation- 200 /jl (soluble and insoluble)
Time to Analysis: F344 rats sensitized to
endotoxin, BN rats to OVA. Exposed 10h/d 1,4,
5d (consecutive). Another group of rats i.t
instilled. Both groups killed 24h postexposure.
The retention of PM in the airways was enhanced by
allergic sensitization. Recovery of anthropogenic
trace elements was greatest for CAPs-exposed rats.
Temporal increases in these elements were
associated with eosinophil influx, BALF protein
content and increased airway mucosubstances. A
mild pulmonary neutrophilic inflammation was
observed in rats instilled with the insoluble fraction
but instillation of total, soluble or insoluble PM2.6 in
allergic rats did not result in differential effects.
Reference: Elder et
al. (2004, 055642)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Fisher344,
SH
Age: 23m (Fisher),
11 -14m (SH)
UFP: argon-filled chamber with
electric arc discharge (TSI, Inc.,
St. Paul, MN)
Particle Size: 36nm
Route: Whole-body Inhalation. Intraperitoneal
(ip) for saline and LPS
Dose/Concentration: UFP: 150/yg/m3 bw; LPS:
2 mg/kg
Time to Analysis: Parameters measured post
single exposure of 6h, 18h
BALF Cells: Neither inhaled UFP nor LPS cause a
significant increase in BAL fluid total cells or
percentage of neutrophils in either rat strain. No
significant exposure-related alteration in total protein
concentration was observed. In both rat strains LPS
induced a significant increase in the amount of
circulating PMNs. When combined with inhaled UFP,
PMNs decreased; for F-344 rats, this decrease was
significant.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: Plasma
fibrinogen increased with LPS in both rat strains with
the magnitude of change greater in SH rats. UFP
alone decreased plasma fibrinogen in SH rats.
Combined UFP and LPS response was blunted but
significantly higher than controls. Hematocrit was
not altered in either rat strain by any treatment. No
change in activites of LDH and b-glucuronidase was
observed.
TAT complexes: With all exposure groups averaged,
plasma TAT complexes in SH rats were 6.5 times
higher than in F-344 rats. LPS caused an overall
increase in TAT complexes for F-344 rats which was
further augmented by inhaled UFP. UFP alone
induced a decreased response. In SH rats, UFP alone
exhibited a significantly increased response and LPS
exhibited a decreased response.
ROS in BALF: In F-344 rats, both UFP and LPS have
independent and significant effects on DCFD
oxidation. Effects were in opposite directions;
particles decreased ROS whereas LPS increased
ROS.
Reference: Elder et
al. (2004, 087354)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: F344
Age: 21m
Freshly generated vehicle
exhaust emissions from I-90
between Rochester and
Buffalo, NY
Particle Size: NR
Route: Whole-body Inhalation; (IT Instillation:
Influenza)
Dose/Concentration: Vehicle exhaust: 0.95-
3.13 x 106 particles/cm3
Endotoxin: 84 EU
Influenza (IV): 10, 000 EID 50 in 250ul
Time to Analysis: 1x6h, 3x6h or both.
Parameters measured 18h post-exposure. 48h
prior to on-road exposures, instilled
intratracheally with IV. Immediate pre exposure
of priming agent endotoxin.
EXPERIMENTS
1: LPS + PM 6h
2: LPS + PM 6h, 3 x 6h
3: IV + PM 6 h
4: IV + PM 6h, 3x 6 h
No departures from normal baseline cellular or
biochemical values were observed, suggesting that
on-road exposures were well tolerated by the rats.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: Increase in
total protein concentration, LDH and B-glucuronidase
activities were observed.
Specific results according to groups 1-4 are as
follows:
Experiment 1: No endpoints revealed significant
differences between groups of rats exposed to gas
phase only versus the gas-phase/particle mixture.
Experiment 2: Combination of endotoxin and
particles produced greater inflammatory responses
than those treated with saline and particles post 1 d.
After 3 days, no statistically significant changes
were noted.
Experiment 3: Influenza virus significantly increased
ROS release in BAL cells.
Experiment 4: Influenza virus significantly increased
both percentage of PMNs in lavage fluid and BAL cell
ROS release.
July 2009 D-93 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Elder et
al. (2005, 088194)
Species: Rat,
Mouse, Syrian
Golden Hamster
Gender: Female
Strain: F-344,
B6C3F1, FIB
HSCb: Printex-90 high surface
area carbon black, Deguss-
Huels (Trostberg, Germany).
LSCb: Sterling V, low surface
area carbon black, Cabot
(Boston, MA)
Particle Size: HSCb - 14nm,
LSCb - 70nm
Reference: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 0,1, 7, 50 mgfm3 HSCb;
50 mg/m3 LSCb (rats only)
Time to Analysis: 6 h/d, 5 dfwk for 13wks.
Parameters measured 1 d, 3mo, 11 mo post-
exposure
Body Weight: Environmental changes pre and post-
exposure affected test subjects' life spans,
particularly hamsters. Hamsters also experienced
significant loss of body weight when exposed to high
doses of HSCb.
Effects of Carbon Black: In rats, lung weight of the
high dose HSCb doubled. After 11 mo, analysis of all
lungs showed no significant difference. Mice had the
highest relative lung burdens at the end of exposure
time but also cleared particles faster at high doses
than rats. However, clearance slowed over the 11 mo
recovery period, especially in high dose mice.
Hamsters showed significant elevations in lung
carbon black burden for all exposures at all time
points. Hamsters exposed to high dose HSCb
exhibited impaired clearance.
BALF Cells: Presence of PMNs was limited to the
mid and high dose groups. Overall maximal response
was reached in mice and hamsters, but not in rats
with increasing mass dose of HSCb.
Reference: Evans
et al. (2006,
097066)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
DEP: collected under dry,
outdoor, ambient conditions
from tractor exhaust pipe
(1985, Japanese ISEK11500
cc tractor) burning Esso 2000
diesel and 20130 mixture of
Esso light engine oil.
10% UF, 90% fine
Cabosil: amorphous silicon
dioxide
16% UF, 84% fine
Particle Size: DEP: 30nm;
Cabosil: 7nm
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 1 mg/rat DEP; 1 mg/rat
Cabosil
Time to Analysis: Pretreatment with 0.5 unit
of bleomycin; IT 3 or 7d after pre treatment;
1wk post-IT
Lung permeability: In bleomycin-treated group,
obvious inflammatory status and edema within the
lung was observed. This was shown by significant
increases in acellular protein and free cells.
Changes in lung: Body weight ratio, lung surface
protein content, free cell counts, and apical surface
protein of rat type I cells were only altered by
bleomycin treatment and not particle exposure.
Reference:
Finnerty et al.
(2007,156434)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: C57BL/61
Age: 12 wks
Weight: 24.3
±0.3g
Coal Fly Ash (generated at U.S
EPA National Risk Management
Research Laboratory by burning
Montana subbituminous coal
under conditions simulating full-
scale utility boiler conditions)
Transition metals of Coal Fly
Ash: Fe, Mg, Ti, Mn, V
Particle Size: >PM2 b
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: PM: 200mg PMfmouse;
9.1 mg/kg
PM+LPS10: 200mg PM + 10mg LPS
PM+LPS100: 200mg PM + 100mg LPS
LPS: 100 /yg
Time to Analysis: Parameters measured 18h
post single exposure
BALF Cells: No significant differences in |
concentration or white blood cell count in any groups
were observed. The percentage of neutrophils in-
creased significantly with PM+LPS100. PMN rose in
PM groups and increased further with LPS
treatment. Increases in PM+LPS were groups
statistically significant. More leukocytes were
present in the alveolar space in PM+LPS10
compared to the PM group. The most severe
response was in the PM+LPS100 group.
Cytokines: Plasma TNF-a and IL-6 significantly
increased for the PM+LPS100 group. An additive
effect of LPS and PM for IL-6 was observed. For
saline and PM groups, pulmonary TNF-a was below
detection range. A synergistic effect for TNF-a was
observed. A less than additive effect for IL-6 was
observed. Pulmonary TNF-a significantly increased in
the PM+ LPS100 group. Pulmonary IL-6 significantly
increased in both PM+LPS groups.
Reference:
Fujimaki et al.
(2006,096601)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: IL-6(-/-) and
WT: B6J129Sv
(control)
Age: 5-6wks
DEP: collected from a 4-
cylinder, 2.74 L, Isuzu diesel
engine
Particle Size: 0.4 /jm
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 1.0, 3.0 mgfm3
Time to Analysis: 12 h/d for 4wks. Parameters
measured 1d post-exposure
BALF Cells: Treatment significantly increased BAL
cells from WT mice at both dose levels. The increase
of macrophages and neutrophils were dose-
dependent. An increase in lymphocytes were present
in WT mice with the low dose. No significant
increase in cells were observed from IL-6 (¦/¦).
Cytokines: TNF-a largely increased in IL-6(-/-) mice
exposed to 3 mg/m3 compared to WT mice. IL-6
production increased in WT mice exposed to 3
mg/m3. CCL3 increased in both WT and IL-6(-/-) at
high dose. IL-1 (3 remained at the control level.
July 2009 D-94 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Gerlofs-Nijland et
al. (2005, 088652)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SH/NHsd
Age: 11-12wks
Weight: 250-350g
RTD: road tunnel dust
(obtained from a Motorway
tunnel in Hendrik-ldo-Ambacht,
Netherlands)
EHC-93
(Ottawa, Canada)
Particle Size: Coarse: 2.5 - 10
fjm; fine: 0.1- 2.5 /jm
Route:IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 0.3,1, 3,10 mg/kg
EHC-93 10 mg/kg
Time to Analysis: Parameters measured
4, 24, 48h post single exposure
BALF Cells: PMN significantly increased in RTD (3
and 10 mg/kg dose) and EHC-93 exposed animals at
24 h and decreased by 48h but remained statistically
significant. AM numbers decreased for 3 mg/kg RTD
group at 4h.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: Myelop-
eroxidase (measured at 24 h in 1, 3,10 mg/kg RTD
groups) was elevated in a dose-dependent manner.
RTD induced time-dependent increases in LDH
activity at 24 and 48h, although these increases
were less than EHC-93 values at the same time
points. Alkaline phosphatase increased dose-
dependently for RTD at 48h. GSH decreased at 24 h
to approximately the same levels in 0.3,1, and 3
mg/kg RTD dose groups. Uric acid only decreased in
1 mg/kg RTD group at 24 h.
Cytokines: IL-6 levels were elevated only at 10
mg/kg for RTD and EHC-93 at 4 and 24 h; it
remained elevated for EHC-93 at 48h. A dose-
dependent increase in TNF-a at 4h for RTD was
observed. TNF-a levels remained elevated only for
the 10 mg/kg groups at 24 h and returned to control
levels by 48h. A dose-dependent increase in MIP-2
for all RTD dose groups were observed and remained
elevated through 48h for both PM types (although
values were returning to control levels).
Hematology: No significant changes in plasma for
bigET-1 or von Willebrand factor were observed. At
the highest dose, fibrinogen levels significantly
increased at 24 and 48h for both PM types.
Pulmonary histopathology: A dose-dependent
increase in the number of inflammatory foci at 24
and 48h for 3 and 10 mg/kg RTD groups was
observed. The response was even greater for the
EHC-93 exposed group at similar time points.
July 2009
D-95
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Gerlofs-Nijland et
al. (2007, 097840)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SH/NHsd
Age: 13wks
Weight: 250-350g
PM samples collected from:
1. MOB high traffic density
2. HIA high traffic density
3. ROM high traffic density
4. DOR moderate traffic
density
5 MGH low traffic density
6 LYC low traffic density
Particle Size: Ooarse: 2.5-10
fjm; Fine: 0.1 ¦ 2.5 fjm
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 3,10mg/kg
Time to Analysis: 24h
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: LDH was
significantly increased for all doses of coarse PM and
for the high dose of fine PM. BALF protein
concentration was observed predominantly at the
high dose of coarse PM. Location ROM had evidence
of attenuated responses with fine PM. Ascorbate
concentrations were reduced but were only
significant for rats exposed to the highest dose of
coarse PM fractions from the locations MOD, HIA,
and LYC.
BALF Cells: Pulmonary inflammation was induced in
a significant and dose-dependent manner for both
dose levels. Inflammation in the BALF included
airway neutrophilia, increased macrophage numbers
and mild lymphocytosis. Both coarse and fine PM
caused dose-dependent aveolitis. Fine PM from LYO
(1 Omg/kg dose) also caused some bronchiolitis.
Cytokines: TNF-a concentrations increased for all
coarse samples with the exception of DOR and LYC.
Fine PM induced similar responses for all sites. MIIP-
2 concentrations increased only at certain sites for
coarse but not fine PM.
Hematology: Fibrinogen responses of SH rats
increased significantly at the high dose of both
fractions of all PM samples, except fine PM from
DOR.
Location-related differences: Coarse PM from
MOB, HIA and MGH induced higher LDH responses
than other locations. Coarse PM from HIA produced
BALF protein concentrations higher than LYC and
ROM. MGH induced greater amounts of BALF protein
than ROM. Coarse PM from LYC lowered fibrinogen
values more than PM from location MOB, HIA, and
MGH. Fine PM showed less differences among the
various sites.
Particle Correlation: Fine PM exhibited significant
correlation between zinc content and BALF
cytotoxicity markers protein and LDH - mainly from
HIA. Fine PM also exhibited positive correlations with
copper and barium. Coarse PM showed positive
correlation with barium and copper, mainly from
MOB.
Reference:
Gerlofs-Nijland et
al. (2009,190353)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SH
Age: 12wks
Weight: 200-300g
PM (Prague, Czech Republic;
Duisburg, Germany; Barcelona,
Spain) (Prague and Barcelona
coarse PM organic extracts)
Particle Size: Coarse: 2.5-10
fjm, Fine: 0.2-2.5/ym
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 7mg PM/kg body weight
Time to Analysis: DTPA added to some PM
samples preinstillation. Instilled with PM.
Necropsy 24h postexposure.
Inflammation (LDH, protein, albumin), cytotoxicity
(NAG, MPO, TNF-a), and fibrinogen were increased
by PM, and were greatest in the coarse PM fraction.
Metal-rich PM had greater inflammatory and
cytotoxic effects, and increased fibrinogen and vWF
and decreased ACE. PAH content influenced greater
inflammation (including neutrophils), cytotoxicity, and
fibrinogen. Generally, whole PM and coarse PM were
more potent than organic extracts and fine PM,
respectively.
Reference: Ghio et
al. (2005, 088272)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: N8 b/b
Belgrade rats and
N8+ lb Belgrade
controls
Oil Fly Ash (Southern Research
Institute, Birmingham, AL)
Particle Size: 1.95 ± 0.18
/jm (MMAD)
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 500//g/rat; 2mg/kg
Time to Analysis: 24h
BALF Cells: Homozygous Belgrade with mutation
G185R had higher levels of Fe and V 24 h post-
exposure. This may demonstrate a decreased ability
to remove Fe and V from the lower respiratory tract
than heterozygous +lb littermates. This also
indicates that DMT1 is normally responsible for at
least some Fe and V uptake; thus, a defective DMT1
transports less.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: Increased
protein and LDH concentrations in the homozygous
strain were observed when compared to control
July 2009
D-96
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference Pollutant
Reference: Ghio et Ferric ammonium citrate (FAC)
al. (2005, 088275) Vanady| su|fate (V0Sq4)
Species: Rat Particle Size: NR
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Age: 60d
Weight: 250-300g
Exposure
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 0.5 mL 100//m FAC/rat;
0.5 mL 10 fjm V0S04/rat; 500 /yg oil fly ash; 2
mg/kg
Time to Analysis: Single or double exposure
with 24 h rest period. Parameters measured 15,
30, 60 min, 24h post exposure.
Effects
DMT1 immunohistochemistry and lung injury:
FAC increased and V0S04 decreased -IRE DMT 1
staining. Same exposures had no effect on +IRE
DMT1. -IRE DMT1 expression in macrophages,
airway and alveolar epithelial cells increased with
increased Fe exposure. Vanadium nearly eliminated
staining except in alveolar macrophages. Increased
metal clearance with pre exposure to FAC. Less
metal clearance with pre exposure to VOSO4. Pre-
exposure to iron diminished lung injury whereas pre-
exposure to vandium increased lung injury after oil fly
ash instillation. Lung injury measured by
concentration of protein and LDH in BAL.
Reference: Gilmour
et al. (2007,
096433)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: BALB/c
Age: 10-12wks
Weight: 20-22g
PM-C0, Fl, UF
(obtained from U.S. Seattle (S),
Salt Lake City (SL), South
Bronx (SB), Sterling Forest
(SF))
SB: included 35% sulfate, 22%
gasoline, diesel and brake
wear.
SF: 48% sulfate.
SL: 34% wood combustion and
28% sulfate
S: 39% wood combustion and
29% sulfate
Residual oil combustion and soil
dust less than 5% for all sites.
Particle Size: CO: 2.5-10/ym;
Fl: ~ 2.5/jm; UF: ~ 0.1/ym
Route: Oropharyngeal Aspiration
Dose/Concentration: 25//g or 100/yg PM; 1.25
or 5 mg/kg
Time to Analysis: 18h
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: Seattle CO
fractions showed no dose-dependent effect on
protein concentration. Results for other locations
were distinctly higher with 100 /yg dose than 25 /yg
and saline doses. SL CO high dose induced the most
significant increase. LDH response was weakly dose-
related. Only SB showed a statistically significant
increase for LDH with the high dose UF.
BALF Cells: PMN increased with the high dose of
CO samples from SB, SL, S, but not SF. No
significant increases from Fl were observed, though
the high dose induced increased PMN. UF from SL
caused a highly variable response.
Cytokines: MIP-2 was similar to PMN response. SB
CO induced the most significant response. SL UF was
highly variable.
Particle Characteristics: LPS was higher in S (CO,
Fl, UF) and SL (CO, Fl, UF). Zn levels were highest in
SB (CO, Fl, UF). Fe was higher in all CO and Fl
samples with SB CO inducing the highest.
Reference:
Gilmour et al.
(2004, 057420)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: CD1
Age: 8-10wks
Weight: 20-25g
Coal Fly Ash
MU: Montana Ultrafine
MF: Montana Fine
MC: Montana Coarse
KF: W.Kentucky Fine
KC: W. Kentucky Coarse
Particle Characteristics:
Montana Sulfur 0.83%, Ash
11.72%. Trace amounts of Be
P, Sr, V, Nb, Cd, Se, Ga, Cu.
Depleted in Si, Al, Fe, Mg, Ti.
Kentucky Sulfur 3.11 %, Ash
8.07%
Particle Size: Coarse:
fj m;
Fine: <2.5//m;
Ultrafine: < 0.2 fjm
Route: Oropharyngeal Aspiration
Dose/Concentration: 25ug or 100//gfmouse
Time to Analysis: 18h
>2.5
BALF Cells: PMN highly increased for MU at both
doses. The level was comparable to the positive
control. PMN also increased with KF at high dose.
Coarse particles caused no significant increase in
PMN. Number of macrophages did not change, but
NAG increased significantly with MU for both dose
levels and with KF and MF at high dose level.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: Total protein
and LDH was not significantly elevated. Albumin
concentration increased significantly after treatment
with the fine high dose of both particle types.
Cytokines: MU particles caused a significant
increase in TNF-a. MIP-2 increased in all fine and
ultrafine PM-instilled animals with the highest in the
MU and KF at both doses. IL-6 was detectable only
in the BALF of MU and KF with substantial
variability. The IL-6 levels were not significant.
July 2009
D-97
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Gilmour PM (collected from precipitator
et al. (2004,
087948)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SH/NQIBR,
WKY
Age: 12wks
Weight: 280-340g
unit of an oil burning power
plant in Boston)
Measured Components of PM:
S, Zn, Ni, V, Al, Cu, Pb, Fe, Ca,
Na, K, Mg, Endotoxin
Particle Size: NR
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 0.0, 0.83, 3.3, and 8.3
mg/kg in SH rats; 0.0 or 3.3 mg/kg in WKY and
SH rats
Time to Analysis: 24h
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: LDH activity
increased in a dose-related manner; this was
observed in SH rats after exposure to 0.83, 3.33 and
8.3 mg/kg PM. SH rats showed greater lung
permeability following PM exposure than WKY rats.
SH rats showed acute lung inflammatory response
after exposure to PM when compared to WKY rats.
BALF Cells: No increase in macrophage number was
observed in either rat strain following saline or PM
exposure at 24 h.
Cytokines: MIP2 mRNA expression increased
significantly in SH PM exposure group only. No
significant differences in TNF-a RNA expression in
either WKY, SH rats or control treatment groups
were observed.
CD14: A significant increase in lung CD14 protein
was observed only in SH rats exposed to PM.
TLR4: A significant increase in TLR4 protein in SH
rats exposed to PM was observed.
NF-kB: A significant increase in NF-kB binding
protein in the nuclei of SH rats exposed to PM was
observed. This effect was not observed in the control
of PM-exposed WKY rats.
Reference: Gilmour ufCB: Ultrafine carbon black
et al. (2004,
054175)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar
Age: 12wks
(Printex 90 (Degussa)
CB: (Huber 990, HR. Haeffner
and Co)
Particle Size: ufCB: 14nm;
CB: 260nm (primary particle
diameter)
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: ufCB: 1.66 mgfm3
fCB: 1.40 mgfm3
Number concentrations
ufCB: 52380 particles/cm3
fCB: 3800 particles/cm3
Time to Analysis: Exposed for 7 h. Sacrificed
0,16 or 48h post exposure.
BAL Cells: Total number of cells increased
significantly in UfCB-exposed rats at 0 and 16 h.
Recruitment of cells did not occur in response to CB
exposure. PMNs increased significantly in the BALF
of ufCB-exposed rats at 16 h. Leukocytes remained
unchanged following CB exposure but increased
significantly at 0 and 48 h post exposure to ufCB.
Cytokine mRNA: A significant increase in BALF
MIP-2 mRNA expression was observed at 48 h. No
differences in MIP-2 mRNA levels were observed in
the whole lung tissue.
Reference:
Godleski et al.
(2002,156478)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SD
Age: NR
Weight: 200-250g
CAPs (Boston; Harvard
Ambient Particle Concentrator)
Particle Size: 0.27±2.3/jm
(diameter)
Route: Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 73.5-733//gfm3
Time to Analysis: Exposed 5hfd, 3d
(consecutive). BAL 24h postexposure
PMNs significantly increased with CAPs exposure
and also in relation to CAPs mass, Br, SO42', EC, 0C
and Pb. An overall increase in pro-inflammatory
mediators and decrease in immune enhancer and
evidence of vascular endothelial responses occurred
with CAPs exposure.
Reference:
Gottipolu et al.
(2009,190360)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar
Kyoto (WKY), SH
Age: 14-16wks
Weight: NR
DE (30-kW (40hp) 4-cylinder
indirect injection Deutz diesel
engine) (02- 20%, CO-1.3-
4.8ppm, NO- <2.5-5.9ppm,
NO?- < 0.25-1,2ppm, S02- 0.2-
0.3ppm, OC/EC- 0.3±0.03)
Particle Size: Number Median
Diameter: Low- 83±2nm, High-
88.2nm; Volume Median
Diameter: Low- 207 ±2nm,
High- 225±2nm
Route: Exposure Chamber
Dose/Concentration: Low- 507 ±4/yg/m3, High-
2201 ±14 //g/m3
Time to Analysis: Exposed 4hfd, 5dfwk, 4wks.
Necropsied 1d postexposure.
DE increased neutrophils in a concentration-
dependent manner, and GGT activity at the high
dose. Particle-laden macrophages were found in DE-
exposed rats. DE dose-dependently inhibited
mitochondrial aconitase activity. DE caused 377
genes to be differentially expressed within WKY rats,
most of which were downregulated, but none in SH
rats. However, WKY rats had an expression pattern
shift that mimicked baseline expression of SH rats
without DE. These genes regulated compensatory
response, matrix metabolism, mitochondrial function,
and oxidative stress response.
Reference:
Gunnison and Chen
(2005, 087956)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: DK (ApoE
LDLr'1')
Age: 18-20wks
CAPS
(Northeastern regional back-
ground)
Ambient air copollutants
measured O3, NO?
Particle Size: 389 ± 211 m
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: CAPS — 131 ± 99//g/m3
including O3 - 10 ppb and NO2 - 4.4 ppb
Time to Analysis: 6h/d, 5d/wk for 4m (5/12/03-
9/5/03). Sacrified 3-4d post exposure.
Microarray Data: 13 genes in the heart tissue and
47 genes in the lung tissue were identified as
possibly affected. Strict standards (1.5 fold
response, 10 % false discovery rate) resulted in
responses by only 1/13 genes (Rex3 - no known
heart physiology) in the heart tissue and 0/47 genes
in the lung tissue. Using more liberal response
(nonstatistical) standards (1.5 fold only) and
comparison of each CAPS animal with all 3 control
animals (3x3 array) resulted in possible effects on 7
additional genes in the heart tissue and 37 genes in
the lung tissue.
July 2009 D-98 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Gurgueira et al.
(2002, 036535)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Weight: 250-300g
CAPs
(Harvard Ambient Particle
Concentrator)
CB
(C198 Fischer Scientific, Pitts-
burg, PA USA)
Composed of 85.9± 0.2%
Carbon, 13.0± 0.2% 02,
1.17± 0.2% Sulfur
ROFA
(Boston, MA USA oil-fired
power plant)
Particle Size: CAPs: 1-2.5
/jm; CB: < 2.5/jm; ROFA:
< 2.5 /jm
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 300 ± 60 //gfm3
Time to Analysis: 1, 3, 5h CAPs Exposure
followed by immediate post-exposure analysis.
5h CB, immediate analysis.
30min ROFA, Immediate analysis.
In situ Chemiluminescence(CL): Data show a
significant increase in lung and heart CL at 5h. Lung
CL increased linearly with time of exposure.
Oxidants: CAPs-initiated oxidative stress was not
detectable in those rats allowed to recover in room
air after the simulated "peak" in particulate air
pollution. Rats breathing particle-free filtered air for
3 days had significantly lower levels of oxidants.
Exposure to inert CB did not exert oxidant effects on
the heart and lung.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: The water
content of the lung and heart increased significantly
upon exposure to CAPs but not to filtered air and
increased as a function of length of exposure. Rats
breathing CAPs also showed increases in LDH and
CPK as a function of length of exposure.
Antioxidant enzymes: Data showed an increase in
SOD and catalase activities in both the lung and
heart. The pattern of increase was tissue specific.
Reference: Hamoir PSC: Polystyrene particles, Route: IT Instillation
et al. (2003,
096664)
Species: Rabbit
Strain: New
Zealand
Age: 12-16 wks
Weight: 2.8 ±
0.5kg
Carboxylate modified, 3 types
PSA: Polystyrene particles,
Amine modified, 1 type
Particle Size: PSC: 24,110 or
190nm (PSC24, PSC 110,
PSC190); PSA: 190nm
Dose/Concentration: PSC24: 0.04 or 4
mg/rabbit
PSC110, PSC190, PSA190: 4mgfrabbit
Time to Analysis: 0, 30, 60, 90,120min
Capillary Filtration Coefficient: A time-c
increase correlating to total number of
particles/surface area, not particle size, was
observed.PSA induced a significant increase in mi-
crovascular permeability as compared to PSC. This
suggests that the number of particles exposed should
be considered an important parameter for measuring
air quality rather than total particle surface area.
July 2009 D-99 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Happo
et al. (2007,
096630)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: C57BL/6J
Weight: 19-30g
Age: 10-11 wks
PMC (Coarse)
PMF (Fine)
PMUF (Ultrafine)
Collected in 6 European cities:
Duisburg, Prague, Amsterdam,
Helsinki, Barcelona, Athens
Particle Size: PMC: PMio2.5;
PMF: PM2.B.0.2: PMUF: PM0.2
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: PMC: 5.9-29.6//g/m3;
PMF: 8.3-25.2//g/m3; PMUF: 2.7-6.7 //g/m3
Dose-response: 1, 3,10mg/kg
Time course: 10 mg/kg
Time to Analysis: 1. Dose-Response study:
parameters measured 24h post exposure. 2.
Time course study: parameters measured 4,12,
24 h post single exposure (at 10 mg/kg).
Total Cell Numbers: 1. For the dose-response
study, all the PMC samples exhibited dose-dependent
increases of total cell numbers. The 3 and 10 mg/kg
doses of PMC induced statistically significant
increases. At 10 mg/kg, only 2/6 samples induced
statistically significant increases. No PMUF samples
induced effects at any dose. 2. For the time-response
study, no increases in cell numbers were shown at 4
h. Though the levels induced by PMC at 24 h were
lower than at 12 h, both levels were statistically
significant. PMF induced statistically significant
increases only at 12 h for 4/6 samples. PMUF
induced only 1 significant increase at 12 h; the 24 h
time point was not tested.
Total Protein/LDH: 1. The lower doses of 1 and 3
mg/kg did not induce significant increases in any of
the PM samples, except for PMUF-Athens. All 6
samples of PMC, at 10 mg/kg, induced significant
increases. At 10 mg/kg, 4/6 PMF samples induced
significant increases. 2. At 4 h, none of the samples
increased protein concentration. The PMC samples,
excluding Prague, induced significantly higher
concentrations at 12 h. At 24 h, only 3/6 PMC
samples induced significant increases. Only 2 PMF
samples induced significant increases at 12 and 24
h. At 12 h, effects induced by PMUF were minimal
and inconsistent: the 24 h time point was not tested.
Cytokine: 1. Only PMC induced dose-dependent
responses that reached statistical significance at 10
mg/kg. PMF and PMUF induced minimal and
inconsistent responses.
TNF-a levels: 2. TNF-a levels increased
significantly at 4 and 12 h by PMC. At 24 h, TNF-a
levels returned to near control levels. PMF, at 4 h,
induced statistically significant increases for 3/6
samples and significant increases in 2/6 samples at
12 h. No PMUF samples significantly increased TNF-
a levels.
IL-6: 2. PMC induced the highest IL-6 levels at 4 h.
Levels at 12 and 24 h were reduced with 6/6 and 3/6
samples showing statistically significant increases,
respectively. PMF showed a similar trend with 4 h
inducing the highest levels that were reduced at 12
and 24 h. Of the PMUF samples, only the Helsinki
and Duisburg samples induced statistically significant
results at 4 and 12 h. Generally, the PMUF responses
were negligible when compared to PMC and PMF.
KC production: 2. All PMC samples induced the
highest levels at 4 h. At 12 and 24 h, levels were
reduced but 4/6 samples induced statistically
significant levels. PMF showed a similar trend- the
highest levels were induced at 4 h (in 3/6 samples).
PMUF at 4 h showed small, though not significant,
increases. At 12 h, only 2 samples showed
statistically significant differences from the control:
the 24 h time point was not tested.
Reference: Harder Carbon UFP
et al. (2005,
087371)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar
Kyoto
Age: 14-17wks
Weight: NR
Particle Size: Diameter:
37.6±0.7nm
Route: Exposure Chamber
Dose/Concentration: 180/yg/m3
Time to Analysis: Telemeter implanted into
peritoneal cavity. 10d recovery. 3d baseline
reading. 24h exposure. 3d recovery.
Carbon UFP mildly but significantly elevated HR
compared to the control. SDNN was significantly
decreased during exposure. UFP induced mild
pulmonary inflammation, significantly increased
PMN, and increased the total protein and albumin
concentrations. Particle-laden macrophages
sporadically accumulated in the alveolar region.
July 2009
D-100
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: CAPs (Detroit; July-Sept.
Harkema et al. 2000; Harvard Ambient Fine
(2004, 056842) Particle Concentrator)
Species: Rat Particle Size: 2.5/jm
Gender: Male (diameter)
Strain: F344, BN
Age: 10-12wks
Weight: NR
Route: Inhalation Exposure Chamber. IT
Instillation.
Dose/Concentration: 4d concentration:
676±288//g/m3, 5d concentration: 313±119
/yg/m3, July concentration: 16-185 //g/m3,
September concentration: 81 -755/yglm3; IT
Instillation- 200 /jl (soluble and insoluble)
Time to Analysis: F344 rats sensitized to
endotoxin, BN rats to OVA. Exposed 10h/d 1,4,
5d (consecutive). Another group of rats i.t
instilled. Both groups killed 24h postexposure.
The retention of PM in the airways was enhanced by
allergic sensitization. Recovery of anthropogenic
trace elements was greatest for CAPs-exposed rats.
Temporal increases in these elements were
associated with eosinophil influx, BALF protein
content and increased airway mucosubstances. A
mild pulmonary neutrophilic inflammation was
observed in rats instilled with the insoluble fraction
but instillation of total, soluble or insoluble PM2.6 in
allergic rats did not result in differential effects.
Reference: DE: generated by 2369-cc
Hiramatsu et al. diesel engine (Isuzu) at 1050
(2003,155846) rpm and 80% load with
Species: Mouse commercial light oil
Gender: Female
Strain: BALB/c and
C57BL/6
Age: 8wks
Weight: 17-22g
Particle Size: NR
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: DEP: 10O/zg/nv1 or 3
mg/m3; S02< 0.01 ppm; NO2 2.2 ±0.3 or 15
±1.5 ppm; CO 3.5 ± 0.1 or 9.5 ± 0.6 ppm
Time to Analysis: 7hfd, 5dfwk for 4 or 12wks,
Immediate
BALF Cells: Alveolar macrophages (AMs) increased
dose-dependently at 30 and 90d. High DE exposure
resulted in bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue
(BALT) around DEP-AMs; this was less conspicuous
in C57BL/6 than in BALB/c mice. B- and T-cell
populations were found in the BALT with no
significant differences observed between the strains.
Lympohocytes and neutrophils increased time- and
dose-dependently with agreater increase in BALB/c
than C57BL/6 observed. No eosinophils or basophils
were observed. Mac-1 -positive cells exposed to high
DE levels increased in both strains at 1 month
(33.8%) and 3 months (20.3%) vs. low dose group
(5.3 and 7% respectively).
Cytokines: At 30d, TNF-a, IL-12p40, IL-4 and IL-10
mRNA increased, IL1b and iNOS decreased. IFNy
increased in BALB/c but decreased in C57BL/c. IL-6
mRNA was not affected. At 90d, IL-4 and IL-10
mRNA similarly increased in C57BL/6 mice exposed
to low DE level but decreased at high DE level.
Reference:
Hollingsworth et al.
(2004,097816)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strains:
C57BL//6TLR+I+,
C57BL//6tlri
Aqe: 8-9 wks
R0FA
Particle Size: NR
Route: Oropharyngeal Aspiration
Dose/Concentratin: 50 ul of 1/yg/mL
suspension per mouse
Time to Analysis: Parameters measured post
single exposure of 6 and 24h.
TLR4-Knocl
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:Inoue
et al.
(2006)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: NCfNga
Age: 10wks
DEP (derived from 4 cyl, 2.74I
light duty diesel)
Particle Size: NR
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: lOO/zg/mouse
Time to Analysis: 1fwk for 6wks. Parameters
measured 24h after last administration
BALF Cells: DEP significantly increased total cells,
neutrophils and mononuclear cells but did not induce
an effect on eosinophils.
Cytokines: DEP increased IL-4, KC and MIP-1. The
increase in IL-5 was not statistically significant.
Reference:
Ishihara et al.
(2003, 096404)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar
Age: 5wks
DE
(from 2 engines, produced on
site)
¦L - low level DE
¦M - medium level
¦MG - DE w/o particulates
¦HR - high level
Measured Components: NO2,
S04, SO2, CO, CO2, NOx, NO,
HTHC, HCHO, 02
Particle Size: L: 0.33 -0.50
fj m
M: 0.35 ¦ 0.40 fjm
HR: 0.42- 0.45/m
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: L: 0.18- 0.21 mgfm3
M: 0.92-1.18 mglm3
MG: 0.01 mg/m3
HR: 2.57 - 2.94 mglm3
Time to Analysis: 16h/d, 6d/wk, for 6,12,18
& 24 m. Parameters measured immediately
following last exposure.
Morbidity and Mortality: Weight gain in HR group
was less than other groups at 18 and 24 mo. This
indicates a significant difference between the HR
and C group. Mortality during the study was
frequent. C group experienced an 8% mortality rate,
L group 12%, M group 15%, MG group 12% and HR
group 23%.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: Significant
differences were seen among groups with respect to
number of total cells and percentages of cell
differential, total protein, fucose, sialic acid,
phospholipid and prostoglandin E2. Total protein
increase was observed in both M and HR dose groups
with the HR group increasing time-dependently.
BALF Cells: The HR group showed a significant
increase in total cell count from 6 to 18mo. The
percentage of PMN increased at 6mo in M, MG and
HR group. M group lymphocytes significantly
increased at 6,12, and 24mo of exposure.
Macrophages decreased at 6mo for the M and HR
groups.
Mucus and Surfactant: The HR group showed a
significant increase from 12 to 18mo.
Reference: Jones,
HR.A.
Hamacher, K.
Clark, J.C.
2005
Species: Rabbit
Strain: New
Zealand
Weight: 2.5- 3.5kg
Ml u vvi\o, 1 iui uuiaoio VVCIC O IIII pic OC III.
At 13 wks, active scarring and raised neutrophil
macrophage counts were still present.
ASP: At 15h, neurophils increased. Macrophages
tripled and remained increased for 3wks.
At 4d, macrophages bore particles.
At 13d, neutrophils decreased significantly.
By 25d, silica spheres were gradually removed from
lungs.
PET Scanning: 18F-fluoroproline showed increased
activity beginning at 14d and peaking at 41 -54d (left
lung control vs right lung challenged).
Microautoradiography: 3h-proline at 13 weeks
showed radiolabel localization to fibroblasts in the
challenged lung
ASP: Amorphous silica particles Route: Intrapulmonary Instillation (Right upper MCSP: At 6h, neutrophils increased. Macrophages
(Hypersil)
MCSP: Microcrystalline silica
particles
Particle Size: ASP: 5(m;
MCSP: 5/ym
lobe of lung)
Dose/Concentration: 50mg in 0.5mL saline
Time to Analysis: Parameters measured at
varying times from 6h to 91 d post treatment.
increased 3 fold.
At 60h, neutrophils were pyknotic and the lungs
displayed a thickened interstitium containing silica
particles.
At 5d, collagen deposition appeared.
AT 8d, fibroblastic activity and necrosis were
observed.
At 15d, aggregation of silica particles and necrotic
debris were apparent.
July 2009
D-102
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Kato
and Kagawa (2003,
089563)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Jcl Wistar
Aqe: 5wks
Roadside air
(Prefectural T okyo-Danishi-
Yokohama highway, Yokohama-
Haneda Airport Metropolitan
expressway and Satsukibashi-
Mizuecho city road, Japan)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: Exposed group: 55.7 ppb
NO2,
62.7/yg|m3 PM;
Control group: 5.1 ppb NO2,
14.3/yg/m3 PM
Time to Analysis: Exposed for 24,48, 60 wks.
Parameters measured immediately following
exposure.
Respiratory tissue: Post 24wks, the lung surface
was light gray with some BC particle deposits. Post
48-60wks, however, the surface was scattered with
particle deposits in addition to its light gray color.
Airway changes: After 60 wks, no remarkable
changes seen in the epithelium. The structure of the
airways remained normal.
Cells: No proliferation or ectopic growth of goblet
cells were noted. Mast cells increased in epithelial
intercellular space. No mast cell degranulation was
observed. Lysosomes increased in cilitated cells post
48wks. Clara cells were unaffected.
Lymph nodes: Deposition of carbon particles were
noted in the trachea and bronchiole-associated lymph
nodes post 24wks.
Alveolar changes: No changes in morphology of
broncho-alveolar junctions were noted. Anthracosis
observed within alveolar walls and pleura post
24wks and became progressively marked with
increased exposure. No change in the number of
alveolar holes between exposure and control groups
were observed.
Reference: Kato,
T.
Yashiro, T.
Murata, Y.
2003
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Age: 7wks
Weight: 190-220g
Polystyrene latex suspension of Route: IT Instillation with nebulizer
latex beads (Japan Synthetic
Rubber Co.), uncoated or
coated with lecithin
Particle Size: 240nm
Dose/Concentration: 5ml of 0.2% suspension
administered over 20 min at flow rate of
0.25ml/min
Time to Analysis: Exposed for 20min.
Parameters measured 30min following
treatment.
Alveolar Macrophages: Following treatment, AMs
appeared undamaged. AMs ingested more uncoated
than coated beads, but both were ingested. Ingestion
of beads differed as coated beads were engulfed
individually while uncoated beads were engulfed
individually or in aggregates.
Epithelial Cells: Type I cells incorporated coated
beads within a layer of cytoplasm. Type II cells
incorporated beads in lamellar bodies. Uncoated
beads were not incorporated.
Other: Neither type of beads were incorporated into
endothelial cells, fibroblasts or interstitium of
alveolar wall
Monocytes: Only the coated beads were
incorporated by the monocytes. They were found
inside and outside phagosomes and lysosomes of
monocytes. PMNs did not incorporate any beads.
Reference:
Kleinman et al.
(2003, 053535)
Species: Rat
Gender: NR
Strain: F344n-NIA
Age: 22-24m
0s
CCL: O3 + Ammonium bisulfate
(ABS) + Elemental Carbon (EC)
CCH: 0s + ABS + EC
Purified Air (control)
Particle Size: CCL: 0.30 ±
2.5 fjm
CCH: 0.29 ±2.3//m
Route: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: O3: 0.2ppm
CCL: 50//g/m3 EC + 70//gfm3ABS ¦
0s
0.2 ppm
140 /yglm3 ABS + 0.2
CCH: 100/yg/m3 EC
ppm O3
Time to Analysis: 4hfd, 3 consecutive dfwk for
4wks
DNA Replication: O3 caused a slight effect of 20-
40% increase. CCL and CCH caused between 250 ¦
340% increase for interstitial and epithelial cells.
CCL induced greater reactions than the high dose.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: Total protein,
mucus glycoprotein and albumin were somewhat
elevated in all exposure groups but only reached
statistically significance for CCL and protein (very
high variability). CCL and CCH both depressed Fc
receptor side binding.No effect for O3 was observed.
BALF Cells: CCL and CCH induced macrophage
respiratory burst activity. The effect induced by O3
was not significant.
Reference:
Kleinman and
Phalen (2006,
088596)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Age: 6 wks
Weight: 200g
L03: Low O3
H03: High Os
LS: Low H2SO4
HS: High H2SO4
L0LS:Low O3 + Low H2SO4
LOHS: Low Os + High H2SO4
HOLS: High Os + low H2SO4
HOHS: High Os + high H2SO4
Particle Size: LS - 0.23
/ym±2.3
HS - 0.28/ym±2.1
LOLS - 0.23//m ±2.3
LOHS - 0.28/ym ± 2.1
HOLS - 0.23//m ± 2.3
HOHS - 0.28/ym ± 2.1
Route: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: L03 - 0.30ppm
H03 - 0.61ppm
LS - 0.48mg/m3
HS - I.OOmgfm3
LOLS - 0.31 ppm + 0.41 mg/m3
LOHS - 0.31 ppm +1.04mg/m3
HOLS - 0.60ppm + 0.52mg/m3
HOHS - 0.60ppm + 0.86mg/m3
Time to Analysis: Exposed for 4h. Parameters
measured 42h post-exposure.
Inflammatory Lesions in Lung Parenchyma:
Neither Type 1 or 2 lung lesions were affected by
sulfuric acid alone. H03 doubled Type 1 lesions and
increased Type 2 lesions 25-fold. Additions of H2SO4
to O3 appeared to have a dose-dependent protective
effect for both types of lesions.
DNA Synthesis in Nasal, Tracheal and Lung
Tissue: Increased DNA synthesis was observed at all
high O3 exposures but was not affected by
coexposure to H2SO4.
Macrophage FcR binding: No effects were
observed (no data for L03 and H03).
Macrophage Phagocytosis: All levels of exposure
(no data for L03 and H03) decreased phagocytosis.
July 2009
D-103
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Kodavanti et al.
(2005, 087946)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: WKY and
SH/NCrlBR
Aqe: 11-14wks
CAPs (EPA, NC)
Measured components included
Al, Be, Ba, Co, Cu, Zn, Pb, Mn,
Ni, Ag, Ti, As.
Particle Size: 1 d: 1.07-1.19
/jm; 2d: 1.27-1.48 /jm
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 1d study: 1138-1765
z^g/m3
2d study: 144-2758//g|m3
Time to Analysis: 4hr (SH only); 4hrfday, 2d
(WKY and SH)
Post-exposure: 1d: 3h except study #4,18-20h;
2d: 18-20h
Breathing Parameters: In a paired analysis of
control SH and treated SH, treated SH showed an
increase in expiratory and inspiratory time due to
CAPs. The treated and control groups of WKY rats
did not show significant differences.
BALF Cells: In the 2d study, WKY rats showed
decreases in total cells; this decrease was
associated with decreased macrophages.WKY
showed an increase in neutrophils.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: Total protein
and albumin in WKY rats decreased whereas SH rats
maintained the same approximate level. LDH activity
lowered slightly in both strains.
Cell Membrane Integrity: SH rats showed
increased GGT (membrane bound enzyme) activity
and plasma fibrinogen for 5/7 exposures but these
increases did not appear to be dose-dependent.
Cytokines: Levels were undetermined in SH rats.
WKY showed slight increases in IL-6, TNF-a, and
MIP-2 but these increases were not statistically
significant.
Reference: Kooter
et al. (2006,
097547)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SH
Age: 12-14wks
CAP-F - fine (Site I)
CAP-UF - fine + ultrafine (Site
II)
(Netherlands)
Some measured Components:
Ammonium, nitrate, sulphate
ions: 56± 16% CAP-F mass,
17 ± 6% CAP-UF mass
Particle Size: 0.15 < CAP-
F < 2.5
0.65-0.75 /jm
CAP-UF< 2.5
0.58-1.41 fjm
Route: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: CAP-F 399- 3613//g/m3
CAP-UF 269-556//g/m3
Time to Analysis: 6hfd for 2d consecutive, 18h
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: Based on
unchanged levels of LDH and ALP, no cytotoxicity
was noted. No significant change in the levels of
total cells were observed. MDA (malondialdehyde)
decreased with CAP-UF. Ho-1 increased with CAP-UF
and CAP-F.
Cytokines: CC16 decreased at 457/yg/m3 of CAP-F
and increased at 3613 /yglm3 of CAP-F.
Hematology: WBC and lymphocytes decreased with
both CAP-F and CAP-UF. MPV and MPC (mean
platelet volume and component) increased with CAP-
UF.
BALF Cells: A decrease in absolute neutrophils as
well as percentages of reticulocytes and percentages
of neutrophils were observed with CAP-F. Increased
percentages of lymphocytes were observed with
CAP-F.
Pathology. No changes were observed.
Reference: Kumar
et al. (2004,
096655)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar
Weight: 150±20g
Fly Ash (Obra Thermal power Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Station, India)
Particle Size: PM < 5 /jm
(90%)
Dose/Concentration: 14.4±1.77 mg/m3
(fluid bed generator)
Time to Analysis: 4hfd for 28d. Parameters
measured immediately following last exposure.
Lung Weight: Lung body weight increased 25.58%
relative to controls. Total body weight slightly
decreased in the treated group.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: LDH, GGT,
ALP and lavagable protein increased by 140,450,
160 and 50%, respectively.
BALF Cells: Only eosinophils(%) increased 95% over
controls.Congestion and focal infiltration of
monocytes in alveolar area was seen. Fly ash laden
macrophages in alveoli combined with hypertrophy of
epithelial lining cells was observed.
Reference:Lei et
al. (2004, 087999)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Weight: 318 ± 8g
CAPs
(Yaipei, Taiwan)
Particle Size: PM: 0.01- 2.5
fj m
Reference: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 371 ± 208//gfm:l
Time to Analysis: 6hfd for 3d,
5h post-exposure pulmonary function.
2d post-exposure for BALF collection
Pulmonary hypertension induced 2wks pre-
exposure
Respiratory Effects: Decreased respiratory
frequency and increased tidal volume for both
experimental and control groups were observed.
However, only the experimental group levels were
statistically significant. There was an increase in
airway responsiveness (Penh/methacholine) for CAPs
group when compared to the control.
BALF Cells: A massive increase in total cell number
and percent neutrophils was observed. There were
no changes in percent macrophages, lymphocytes
and eosinophils.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: Total protein
and LDH increased in the CAPs group.
Cytokines: TNF-a and IL-6 were not affected.
July 2009
D-104
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:Lei et
al. (2004, 087884)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Weight: 300-350g
CAPs from Asian dust storm
(Taiwan)
Measured Components: Si, Al,
S, Ca, K, Mg, Fe, As, Ni, W, V,
organic carbon, elemental
carbon, SO2, NO2, nitrate,
sulfate
Particle Size: PM: 0.01- 2.5
fj m
Route: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 315.6 //gfm3 (Low)
or 684.5 //g/m3 (High)
Time to Analysis: Low: Exposed for 6h.
Sacrified 36h post exposure
High: Exposed for 4.5h. Sacrified 36h post-
exposure
Pulmonary hypertension induced 2wk pre-
exposure
Hematology: PM induced a dose-dependent increase
in WBCs. No change was seen in RBCs. Platelet
results were highly variable.
BALF Cells: PM induced dose-dependent increases in
total cells and percentage of neutrophils. No change
in macrophages, lymphocytes or eosinphils occurred.
Basophils were highly variable.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: Dose-
dependent increases were observed for total protein
andLDH.
Cytokines: IL-6 increased dose-dependently.
(control: 33.5 ± 7.5, LOW 165.1 ± 117.2,273.6 ±
62.8 pg/mL)
Reference: Li et al. DEP (2369-cc diesel engine Route: Exposure Chamber
(2007,155929)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: BALB/c,
C57BL/6
Age: 9wks
Weight: NR
manufactured by Isuzu Motor,
operated at 1050 rpm, 80%
load, commercial light oil)
Particle Size: NR
Dose/Concentration: DEP: 103.1 ±9.2//g/m3,
CO: 3.5±0.1ppm, NO2: 2.2±0.3ppm, SO2:
<0.01ppm
Time to Analysis: Protocol 1: Exposed 7hfd,
5d/wk. Sacrificed at day 0, week 1, 4, 8.
Protocol 2: DE alone or DE+NAC 7h/d, 1-5d.
Airway hyperresponsiveness: Penh values
increased in BALB/c mice compared to the control at
day 0, but no significant changes occurred after this
time. Penh values increased in C57BL/6 mice at 1wk
compared to the control but returned to control levels
at 8wks.
BALF: Compared to the other strain, the total
number of cells and macrophages increased
significantly at 1wk in C57BL/6 mice and at 8wks in
BALB/c mice. Neutrophils, lymphocytes, MCP-1, IL-
12, IL-10, IL-4, IL-13 increased significantly for both
strains. No eosinophils were found. IL-1f3 and IFN-y
increased significantly in BALB/c mice compared to
C57BL/6 mice.
HO-1 mRNA and protein: HO-1 mRNA was more
marked in BALB/c mice at 1wk and C57BL/6 mice at
4 and 8wks. H0-1 protein percentage changes from
the control were greater in BALB/c mice at 1 wk and
C57BL/c mice at 8wks.
NAC: NAC inhibited the increased Penh values, total
number of cells and macrophages in C57BL/6 mice at
1wk and neutrophils and lymphocytes in both strains.
Reference: Liu et
al. (2008,156709)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: BALB/c
Age: 11wks
Weight: NR
DEP (5500-watt single-
cylinder diesel engine generator
(Yanmar, Model YDG 5500E),
406 cc displacement air-cooled
engine, Number 2 Diesel
Certification Fuel, 40 weight
motor oil)
Particle Size: —0.1 /jm
(MMAD)
Route: Intranasal Exposure
Dose/Concentration: Average particle
concentration: 1.28mg/m3
Time to Analysis: Four groups: saline+air
control, saline+DEP,A fumigatus+w,
A. fumigatus+U£P. A. fumigatus exposure every
4d for 6 doses. DEP exposure 5h/d for 3wks
concurrent with A. fumigatus exposure.
A.fumigatus+DEP increased IgE, the mean BAL
eosinophil percentage, goblet cell hyperplasia, and
eosinophilic and mononuclear cell inflammatory
infiltrate around the airways and blood vessels
compared to the A. fumigatus or DEP treatments.
A.fumigatus+DEP also caused methylation at the
IFN-y promoter sites CpG'63, CpG'46, and CpG'206.
Reference: Lopes
et al. (2009,
190430)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: BALB/c
Age: 6-8wks
Weight: NR
PM (high density traffic: winter
2004; Sao Paulo, Brazil) (NO2,
CO, SO2)
Particle Size: Diameter: 10
fj m
Route: Open-Top Exposure Chamber
Dose/Concentration: 33.86 ±2.09 /yg/m3
Time to Analysis: Some rats pretreated with
papain. Exposed to UAP or filtered air 24h/d,
7d/wk, 2m.
The papain+UAP treatment increased Lm values,
collagen fibers, and decreased the density of elastin
fibers over the papain+filtered air treatment. The
papin+UAP treatment increased 8-isoprotane more
than any other group.
July 2009
D-105
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Mangum et al.
(2004, 097326)
Species: Rat
Gender: Female
Strain: CDF
(F344)/CrlBR
Aqe: 7wks
TiCb pigment grade (DuPont)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 10, 50 or 250mgfm3
Time to Analysis: 6hfd x 5d/wk for 13wks.
Parameters measured 0, 4,13, 26, 52 wks post-
exposure.
OPN (osteopontin) Expression: At 0 wks, 0PN
mRNA expression exhibited a dose-dependent
increase. Low dose induced a 2-fold increase while
the high dose induced an almost 100 -fold increase.
At 4 wks, the mid-dose and high-dose elevated OPN
mRNA levels. At 13wks, the high dose elevated OPN
mRNA levels.No significant elevation with mid dose
level was observed. At 26wks, the mid and high dose
induced elevated OPN mRNA levels. At 52wks, rats
in the low, mid and high dose groups all indicated
elevated levels of OPN mRNA. Specifically, the low,
mid and high doses induced a 3-fold increase, 7-fold
increase and 400-fold increase, respectively.
OPN Protein in BALF: Data was not reported at 0
and 4 wks. At 13 wks, protein increased 9-fold
(— 800 pg/mL OPN) at mid dose and 100 -fold
(~ 8000 pg/mL OPn) at high dose. At 26 wks, the
mid and high dose groups remained elevated. At 52
wks, protein increased by 2.5 fold in low dose, 7-fold
in mid dose and 166-fold in high dose group.
Histopathology: At 52wks, slight OPN
immunoreactivity was observed in control and low
dose group (immunostaining mostly limited to
intraalveolar MACSI.Trichrome-stained lung sections
from control and low dose groups showed no
increase in collagen. Rats exposed to mid or high
dose groups showed areas of lesions.
Reference: Martin UAP-BA: Urban Air particles
et al. (2007,
096366)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: BALB/c
Aqe: 1-2 mo
(Buenos Airs, Argentina)
Particle Size: < 2.5/ym
Route: Intranasal Installation
Dose/Concentration: 0.17 mg/kg bw
Time to Analysis: 3xday, 3dfwk, 2d apart (1, 4,
7d). Parameters measured 1h post-exposure.
Particle Characteristics: 3 types, ultrafines
< 0.2um (inorganics ND), bunched agglomerates of
ultrafines and <40um with aluminum silicates, ions
and trace metals.
Morphometry: Induced focal inflammatory lesions.
Accumulation of refractile material in upper and
lower respiratory tract. PM in phagocytes of
bronchiolar lumen and alveolar space. No evidence of
fibrosis and/or collagen changes.
BALF Cells: Increased amount of phagocytes in
alveolar area, reducing airspace percentage (control
52.9% ± 1.39, UAP-BA 24.7% ± 2.87). Increased
number of PAS positive cells.
Reference: Mauad PM (busy traffic street Sao
et al. (2008, Paulo, Brazil; Aug. 2005-April
156743) 2006) (NO?, SO?, CO)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male,
Female
Strain: BALB/c
Age: 10d
Weight: Parental:
21,4±4.0 -
26.3 ± 2.8g; 15d-old
offspring: 7.8±1.1
- 9.0 ± 1,0g; 90d-
old offspring:
20.3±2.3 -
27.4±1.8q
Particle Size: 2.5,10/ym
(diameter
Route: Open-Top Chamber
Dose/Concentration: PM2.6: filtered chamber-
2.9±3.0/yglm3, nonfiltered chamber- 16.9±8.3
/yg/m3; Outdoor concentration: PMio- 36.3 ± 15.8
/yglm3, CO- 1.7±0.7ppm, NO- 89.4±31.9//gfm3,
SO?- 8.1 ±4.8//g/m3
Time to Analysis: Nonfiltered exposure 24hfd
4m. Mated at 120d exposure. After birth, 30
females and offspring transferred to filtered or
nonfiltered chamber. Killed 15 or 90d of age.
Mild foci of macrophage accumulations containing
black dots of carbon pigment occurred in the alveolar
areas on 90d-old mice. Surface-to-volume ratio
decreased from 15 to 90d of age and was higher in
mice exposed to air pollution. PM exposure reduced
inspiratory and expiratory volumes at higher levels of
transpulmonary pressure.
Reference:
McDonald et al.
(2004, 087459)
Species: Mouse
Strain: C57BL/6
Aqe: 8-10wks
DEE: high load, No 2, No cat
(620: 1 dilution)
DEE-ER (Control): Emissions
Reduced (high load, low sulfur
ECD1) (same dilution)
(Yanmar diesel generator, 406
cc, 5500 watt load)
Particle Size: DEE: 11 Onm;
DEE-ER: NR
Route: IT Installation
Dose/Concentration: DEE PM: 236 //gfm3
DEE-ER PM: 7/yg|m3
Time to Analysis: DEE: 6hfd for 7d.
DEE-ER: 6h/d for 7d. RSV administered post-
exposure for some: single, 4d. Those not
infected with RSV sacrificed immediately upon
last exposure.
Differences in Exposure Conditions: CO, PM,
elemental carbon, organic carbon, nitrate, alkyne, c2-
c212 alkenes, phenanthrenes, total particle PAHs,
total Oxy-PAHs, benzene, pyrene, benzo(ayrene, zinc
were reduced by 90-100% in the emissions reduction
case. Most other components were reduced by
around 60%.
DEE vs. DEE-ER Effects: DEE increased viral
retention and lung histopathology. DEE-ER increases
were not statistically significant.
Cytokines: DEE increased TNF-a, IL-6, IFN-y and
HO-1. DEE-ER responses were not statistically
significant (significantly higher variability in DEE-ER
controls vs. DEE controls).
July 2009
D-106
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
McQueen et al.
(2007,096266)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar
Weight: 228-500g
DEP: SRM 2975 (NIST) Route: IT Instillation
Particle Size: NR Dose/Concentration: 0.5 mL/rat of 1 mgfmL; 1-
2.2 mg/kg
Time to Analysis: Single exposure, sacrificed
6h post exposure. Pre exposure: Vagotomy
(sectioning of vagus nerve) or
Atropine 1 mg/kg i.p. administered 30 min prior, 2
and 4h post.
BALF Cells: A 9-fold increase in neutrophils with
high individual variability in response was observed.
Bilateral vagotomy prior to DEP reduced neutrophil
increase to 3 fold. Vagotomy with saline instillation
had no effect. Atropine reduced neutrophils to levels
similar to saline response. No differences were
observed between DEP response in anesthetized
when compared to conscious animals. Macrophages,
eosinophils and lymphocytes remain unchanged.
Respiratory Response: RMV increased post DEP.
Vagatomy reduced response by one-third. Atropine
pre-treatment did not have effect.
Cardiovascular Response: Blood pressure and
heart rate were unaffected. Average arterial 02
increased after DEP, but not when compared for
each animal. CO2 and pH were not affected
Reference:
Medeiron et al.
(2004,096012)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: BALB/c
Age: 60d
Weight: 20-30g
CP: Carbon particles
PSA: R0FA (solid waste
incinerator hospital Sao Paulo,
Brazil)
PSB: electric precipitator, steel
plant, Brazil)
PSA/PSB Characteristics:
Generally, PSB had greater
component concentrations than
PSA: Br (100+x), Cr (3x), Fe
(10+x), Mn (2x), Rb (60+x), Se
(7x), Zn(4x). PMA>PMB: Ce
(3x), Co (10+x), La (1 OOx), Sb
(15x), V (50x).
Particle Size: CP: 1.7 ± 2.5
/ym (78% < 2.5/ym)
PMA: 1.2 ±2.2/ym(98
% < 2.5 /ym)
PMB: 1.2 ± 2.2/ym
(98% < 2.5 /ym)
Reference: Intranasal Instillation
Dose/Concentration: CP: 10/yg/mouse;
0.5mg/kg
PSA: 0.1,1 or 10/yg/mouse; 0.005, 0.05, 0.5
mg/kg
PSB: 0.1,1 or 10/yg/mouse; 0.005, 0.05, 0.5
mg/kg
Time to Analysis: Single, 24h
Hematology: PSA and PSB decreased leukocyte
count (all 3 doses) and platelet count (2 high doses).
No effect on hemoglobin, erythrocytes and
reticulocytes was observed. Fibrinogen levels
increased for both PSB and PSA with PSB seeing a
higher increase. None of the effects were dose-
dependent.
Bone Marrow: Erythroblasts increased for PSA at
all dose levels and PSB at mid and high dose levels
(high variability).
BALF Cells: No change in BAL cell count was seen.
Quantitative cellular counts increased for
perivascular area for both groups at all dose levels.
Inflammatory cells in alveolar septum area only
increased for PSA.
Reference:
Mutlu et al. (2006,
155994)
Species: Mouse
Strain: C57BL/6
Age: 6-8wks
Weight: 20-25g
PM10
Collected by baghouse from
Dusseldorf, Germany
Particle Size: NR
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 100 ng/mouse; 1
/yg/mouse; 10/yg/mouse; 100/yg/mouse
Time to Analysis: 1-7d
Alveolar Fluid Clearance: At 100 /yg/mouse,
decreased clearance peaked at 24 h and recovered at
7d.
Histology: Evidence of mild lung injury at doses of
100 /yg/mouse or more was seen.
BALF Cells: Significant increase in total cell number
was observed. Neutrophils increased but this was
not statistically significant.
Wet/Dry Ratio: Exposure did not induce any effects.
Na, K-ATPase: At 100/yg/mouse, decreased activity
of Na, K-ATPase in basolateral membranes was
observed.
Reference:
Nadziejko, et al.
(2002, 087460)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SHR
(spontaneously
hypertensive rats)
Aqe: 16wks
CAPs: produced at Tuxedo, NY
laboratory using centrifugal
aerosol concentrator
FA: Fine Particle Sulfuric Acid
Aerosol
UFA: Ultra-Fine Particle
Sulfuric Acid Aerosol
Particle Size: CAPs: PM2.6;
FA: 160nm; UFA: 50-75nm
Route: Nose-only Inhalation (implanted blood
pressure transmitters)
Dose/Concentration: CAPS 80, 66/yg/m3; avg
73/yg/m3
FA 299, 280,119, 203 /yg/m3; avg 225 /yg/m3
UFA 140, 565, 416, 750 /yg/m3; avg 468 /yg/m3
Time to Analysis: 10 exposures of 4h each,
each exposure at least 1 wk apart.
(2 exposures to CAPs, 4 to FA and 4 to UFA)
Respiratory rate: CAPs decreased the respiratory
rate as did FA at all dose levels. However, the FA-
induced respiratory rate was not statistically
significant unless the data was combined. UFA
increased this rate significantly.
Heart Rate: CAPS depressed the heart rate
significantly during exposures (data only significant
when combined) but returned to normal post-
exposure. FA induced a decrease as well with
continuation 7h post-exposure. UFA increased heart
rate.
Diastolic Blood Pressure: Caps and FA induced a
decrease but this was not statistically significant.
UFA induced a slight increase.
July 2009
D-107
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Nemmaret al.
(2007,156800)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar
Kyoto
Age: 16wks
Weight: 424 ± 8
DEP: SRM 2975
Particle Size: < 1/ym
Route: Intravenous Injection
Dose/Concentration: 0.02, 0.1 or 0.5 mg/kg
Time to Analysis: single, 24h
Cardiovascular: DEP depressed blood pressure at all
doses approximately equally. DEP depressed heart
rate at all doses equally.
Hematology: No effect on number of platelets,
granulocytes, monocytes, lymphocytes or RBC s. Tail
bleeding time (associated with platelet activity)
decreased at doses of 0.02 and 0.5mgfkg.
BALF Cells: Marked cellular influx at all dose levels
Was observed. Macrophages increased at the high
dose, but this was not statistically significant. PMN
increased significantly at all dose levels.
Wet/Dry Ratio: All dose levels induced increases.
Reference:
Nemmaret al.
(2003,087931)
Species: Hamster
Gender: Male and
Female
Weight: 100-110g
PS: Polystyrene particles
PSC: Polystyrene particles,
Carboxylate modified
PSA: Polystyrene particles,
Amine modified
Particle Size: PS, PSC, PSA-
60: 60nm; PSA-400: 400nm
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 5, 50 or 500 //gfanimal;
0.05, 0.5, 5mg/kg
Time to Analysis: Single, 10min post-exposure
Rose Bengal administered to induce thrombosis,
immediate study thereafter
Thrombosis: Only PSA-60 at 50 and 500 levels
enhanced thrombus formation but not in a dose-
dependent manner. At 500 /yg, PSA-60 showed
evidence of pulmonary thrombosis. No effect with
PSA-400 was seen.
BALF Cells: Both PSA-60 and PSA-400 (PSA-
60 > PSA-400) induced a massive influx of PMNs.
PSA-60 effect may exhibit some dose-dependency.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: Small
increases in total protein were seen at 500 fjg level
for both PSA-60 and PSA-400. LDH was increased at
all PSA-60 levels but not for 500ug PSA-400.
Histamine increased for all PSA-60 levels and PSA-
400 but due to high variability only the effect at 500
/yg PSA-60 was statistically significant.
Hematology: PSA-60 and PSA-400 had an effect on
platelet closure time at very low concentrations: 3
and 9//gfl respectively and plateaued thereafter..
Reference:
Nemmaret al.
(2003, 097487)
Species: Hamster
Gender: NR
Weight: 100-110g
DEP: SRM 1650
Particle Size: NR
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 50 //gfanimal
Time to Analysis: Single exposure, parameters
measured 1, 3, 6 or 24h post exposure.
BALF Cells: DEP led to a significant PMN flux at 1 h
(13% of total cell number), 6 h (22%) and 24 h
(37%).
Thrombosis: DEP induced a significant increase in
the cumulative mass of in vivo generated thrombus
when compared to control subjects.
Hematology: No decrease in platelet count was
observed. Consistent (non time-dependent) decrease
in closure time signified increased platelet activation
for DEP-exposed groups.
Histamine: Concentrations in BALF were
consistently elevated starting at 1 h. Plasma
histamine did not increase until 6 h.
Pretreatment with histamine receptor
antagonist: A major decrease in DEP induced PMN
infiltration was seen. Thrombogenicity was
decreased after 6h as was closure time shortening.
No effect on histamine in BALF or plasma was
observed.
Reference:
Nurkiewicz et al.
(2009,191961)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SD
Age: 7-8wks
Weight: NR
Fine Ti02 (Sigma-Aldrich-
(titanium (IV)) oxide, 224227,
St. Louis, M0) (~ 99% rutile)
TiO/ nanoparticles (DeGussa-
Aeroxide Ti02 P25, Parsippany,
NJ) (80% anatase, 20% rutile)
Particle Size: Fine Ti02-
Primary size: < 5 fjm, MMAD:
402nm, CMD: 710nm; Nano-
Ti02- Primary size: 21 nm,
MMAD: 138nm.CMD: 100nm
Route: Aerosol Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 1.5-16mg/m3
Time to Analysis: Acclimated 5d. Exposed 240-
720min. Anesthetized 24h postexposure.
Intravital microscopy, NO measurement,
microvascular oxidative stress measurement,
nitrotyrosine staining.
Arteriolar Dilation: Nano-Ti02 significantly impaired
endothelium-dependent arteriolar dilation. Equivalent
levels of arteriolar dysfunction were found in fine
and nano-Ti02. Arteriolar dilation in response to
abluminal microiontophretic application of SNP was
not different from the controls or between the
exposure groups. Arteriolar dilation was partially
restored by radical scavenging with TEMP0L and
catalase, NADPH oxidase with apocynin, and MP0
inhibition with ABAH.
Microcirculation: R0S increased in both groups.
Nano-Ti02 significantly increased the area of tissue
containing nitrotyrosine in the lung and
spinotrapezius microcirculation.
NO: Fine and nano-Ti02 significantly and dose-
dependently decreased stimulated NO production in
isolated microvessels. NO production was increased
by radical scavenging with TEMP0L and catalase or
NADPH oxidase with apocynin, and was largest in
the fine Ti02 group.
July 2009
D-108
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Pereira Ambient Particles
et al. (2007,
156019)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar
Aqe: 3m
(Porto Allegre, Brazil)
Particle Size: < 10/ym
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: P-6: 34, 22 or 225 /yglm3
P-20: 139 or 112 //g/m3
P-l: 99/yglm3
Time to Analysis: P-6: single/continuous for 6h
P-20: single/continuous for 20h
P-l: intermittent (5h) periods per day for 4d
consecutively
Parameters measured 0 or 24 h post-exposure
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: An increase
in lipid peroxidation was statistically significant only
for the 20 h continuously exposed group.Leukocytes
also increased at P-20. No change at P-6. Total
protein remained unaffected at all dose levels.
Wet to Dry Ratio (Oh): No effect was observed.
Reference:
Pinkerton et al.
(2004, 087465)
Species: Rat
Gender: Female
(pregnant),
Offspring- NR
Strain: SD
Age: 10d (pups),
Pregnant females-
10-14d of gestation
Weight: NR
PM (Fe and soot from
combustion of acetylene and
ethylene in a laminar diffusion
flame system)
Particle Size: Median
diameter: 72-74nm; size range:
10-50nm
Route: Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: Mean mass
concentration: 243 ±34/yglm3; Average Fe
concentration: 96 /yglm3
Time to Analysis: Exposed 10d postnatal a
6hfd, 3d (consecutive). Bromodeoxyuridine
injected 2h before necropsy.
A significant reduction of cell proliferation occurred
only within the proximal alveolar region of exposed
animals compared to controls. There were no
significant differences between the groups for
alveolar formation and separation within the proximal
alveolar region.
Reference:
Pinkerton et al.
(2002, 087645)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male,
Female
Strain: SD
Age: 11-13wks
(adult male), 10-
12d (neonatal)
Weight: NR
PM (Fe, Soot) (ethylene, iron
pentacarbonyl, acetylene
combined: Fe203; soot: 60%
EC, 40% OC)) (CO, NO,)
Particle Size: Fe (diameter)-
40nm; Soot (primary particles,
diameter)- 20-40nm
Route: Whole-body Exposure
Dose/Concentration: Adult males: Fe- 57, 90
/yglm3, Soot- 250 /yglm3, Fe+Soot- Fe: 45
/yglm3, Total PM: 250 /yglm3; Neonates:
Fe+Soot- Low: Fe- 30 /yglm3, Total PM: 250
/yglm3, High: Fe- 100 /yglm3, Total PM: 250
/yglm3
Time to Analysis: Adult males exposed to Fe,
soot, Fe+Soot, or filtered air. Exposed 6h/d, 3d
(consecutive). BAL performed within 2h
postexposure, lung tissue evaluations 24h
postexposure. Pregnant dams housed from GD 3
to weaning at 21 d-old. Neonatal rats exposed to
Fe+Soot 10-12d-old and 23-25d-old.
Fe: Only the high dose had significant effects. This
dose increased total protein in the lavage fluid,
decreased total antioxidant power, induced GST
activity, and induced a non-significant, increasing
trend of GSH and GSSG. IL-1 (3, intracellular ferritin,
and NF-kB increased.
Fe+Soot, Soot: Fe+Soot significantly reduced the
total antioxidant power in BALF and supernatant
from lung tissue homogenate. Fe+Soot significantly
increased GSSG, IL-1(3, NF-kB, CYP1A1, and
CYP2E1. CYP2B1 increased but was not significant.
Soot alone was not significant for anything.
Neonates: The high-dose significantly decreased cell
viability, increased LDH activity, and increased IL-1 (3
and ferritin. Both doses significantly increased
GSSG, GRR, and GST, and decreased total
antioxidant power.
Reference: Pires-
Neto et al. (2006,
096734)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: Swiss Age:
6d
Ambient Air: PM2.6, NO2 and CB
(Sao Paulo, Brazil)
Particle Size: PM2.6
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: PM2 e: 46.49 /yglm3
Control: 18.62 /yglm3
NO2: 59.52/yglm3
Control: 37.08/yglm3
CB: 12.52/yglm3
Control: 0/yglm3
Time to Analysis: 24h|d, 7d|wk for 5mo
(weaned at 21 d into exposure - mothers
removed)
Nasal Cavity: Increased total mucus and acidic
mucus at proximal and medial areas of cavity.
Nonsecretory epithelium declined. No significant
changes in amount of neutral mucus, volume
proportion of neutral mucus, volume proportion of
total mucus, thickness of epithelium, volume
proportion of nonsecretory epithelium or ratio
between neutral and acidic mucus were observed.
Types of Acidic Mucus Cells: Proximal and medium
cells increased. Effects on distal cells were
equivocal.
Reference:
Pourazar et al.
(2005, 088305)
Species: Human
Gender: Male and
Female (nonatopic
81 nonsmokers)
Age: 21 -28yrs
DEP: generated from idling
Volvo diesel engine
DEP 300 /yglm3 comprised of:
NO21.6ppm
NO 4.5ppm
CO 7.5ppm
Hydrocarbons 4.3ppm
Formaldehyde 0.26mg|m3
Suspended particulates
4.3x10"6|cm3
Particle Size: < 10/ym
Route: Whole-body exposure chamber
Dose/Concentration: DEP 300 /yglm3
Time to Analysis: Single exposure for 1 h.
Parameters measured 6h post exposure.
Transcription Factors: Exposure induced increased
cytoplasmic and nuclear immunoreactivity of phos-
phorylated p38 MAPK in bronchial epithelium.
Increased nuclear translocation of phosphorylated
p38 and JNK MAPK as well as increased nuclear
phosphorylated tyrosine immunoreactivity were
observed. No change in total or nuclear c-fos
immunoreactivity was seen. Exposure induced
increased nuclear translocation of phosphorylated
JNK significantly associated with phosphorylation of
nuclear c-jun and also resulted in an increase in
nuclear p65.
Cytokines: Expression of IL-8 was positively
associated with nuclear phosphorylated p38 post-
exposure.
July 2009
D-109
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Pradhan et al.
(2005,096128)
Species: Rat
Gender: Female
Strain: Wistar
Albino
Weight: 120-180
RSPM: Respirable Suspended
PM
(Lucknow, India)
Quartz dust (positive control)
Particle Size: < 5/ym
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 2.5, 5.0, or 10.Omg/
0.05ml; 20, 42, 83 mg/kg
Time to Analysis: Sacrificed 15d post single
exposure.
Relative Lung Weight: A dose-dependent increase
in total lung weight of RSPM-instilied animals was
observed.
BALF Cells: Exposure induced a dose-dependent
increase in total cells dose-dependent with the low
and mid dose levels. PMNs increased massively at all
dose levels with RSPM inducing less of an increase
than Quartz. Exposure at low dose levels resulted in
an influx of inflammatory cells (predominantly
macrophages into lumen of alveolar ducts and
alveoli). Reaction at the high dose was more intense
than that seen in mid dose-exposed lungs.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: A significant
dose-dependent increase in LDH and NO was
observed, but the Quartz-induced increase was
greater than the RSPM-induced increase. An increase
in protein was significant at the mid dose level for
RSPM and significant at the high dose level for both
RSPM and Quartz.
Lung biochemistry: An increase in lipid peroxidation
was dose-dependent. Superoxide dismutase (SOD)
enzyme levels showed a dose-dependent decrease.
Reference: Ramos
et al. (2009,
190116)
Species: Guinea
Pig
Gender: NR
Strain: -
Age: NR
Weight: 330-370g
WS (Pine wood)
(C0(<80ppm), 002(0.35%),
02(20.1%), PM2.6, PM10)
Particle Size: PM2.6, PM10
Route: Whole-body Inhalation Chamber
Dose/Concentration: WS: 60g, PM2.6: 363±23
/yg/m3, PM10: 502±34/yg/m3
Time to Analysis: Exposed 3h, 5dfwk for 1, 2,
3, 4, 6, 7m.
WS significantly decreased body weight between 4
and 7m exposure. The concentration of blood
carboxyhemoglobin increased. Recovered BAL cells
were higher in WS-exposed pigs. Macrophages and
neutrophils increased. Inflammation in the lungs was
seen. Pulmonary arterial hypertension and
emphysematous lesions were observed. Macrophage
and lung tissue homogenate elastolysis increased.
Collagenolysis increased. Generally, MMP-2, MMP-9,
and MMP-1 increased. BAL macrophage apoptosis
increased with time.
Reference: Rao et DEP: SRM 2975
al. (2005, 095756) partjc|e Sjze: g 5/ym
Species: Rat
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Weight: 175g
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 5, 35, 50mg/kg bw
Time to Analysis: Sacrificed 1, 7, 30d post
single exposure. Cytokines measured after 24h
incubation (in vitro).
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: Increased
albumin at 1 and 30d at all dose levels. Increased
LDH except at low dose at 7d.
BALF Cells: Macrophages unaffected. Increased
PMNs at 1 d for all dose levels, sustained elevation at
7d for mid and high dose and at 30d for all dose
levels.
Cytokines: The high dose induced a significant
increase of mRNA expression for IL-1 (3, iNOS, MCP-
1, and MIP-2 in BAL cells. MCP-1 mRNA sustained
high levels at 7d for mid and high dose and at 30d for
all dose levels. mRNA expression of IL-6, IL-10, TGF-
(31, TNF-a were unaffected. However, IL-6 and
MCP-1 proteins increased significantly in BALF at 1d
for mid and high dose, returning to basal levels at 7d.
MIP-2 increased for all dose levels at all time points.
NO level unaffected.
July 2009
D-110
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Reed et
al. (2006,156043)
Species: Rat,
Mouse
Gender: Male and
Female
Strain: CDF
(F344)/CrlBR (rat),
SH (rat), A/J
(mouse), and
C57BL/6 (mouse)
Age: 6-12wks
HWS (burned mix of hardwood
in noncertified wood stove
using a Pineridge model 27000,
Heating and Energy Systems,
Inc. Clackamas, OR)
Measured Components: EC,
OM, NO3, SO4, NH4, metals
Particle Size: ~0.25//m
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: Low: 30 //gfm3
Mid-low: 100 /yglm3
Mid-high: 300/yg/m3
High: 1000 //g|m3
Time to Analysis: 6hrfd, 7dfwk for 1 wk or 6m.
Immediate post-exposure analysis.
Organ weights: Liver declined in rats of both
genders at 1 wk and female rats at 6m. Lung volume
increased and lung weight decreased in female rats
at 6m. Spleen weight increased in female mice and
rats at 1wk. Thymus weight decreased in male rats
at 1wk.
Clinical Chemistry: Cholesterol decreased at the
high dose for male rats at 1wk and 6m and increased
at mid-low and mid-high doses for female rats at 6m.
ALP decreased for rats of both genders at 1wk and
6m for mid-low, mid-high and high dose levels (14-
38%). AST decreased by 24% in male rats at 1wk
with high dose. No effect on females. Creatinine
serum levels decreased in males at 1wk at mid-high
and high dose by 13%. No effect observed at 6m.
BUNfCre ratio decreased in females at 1wk (25%)
and both genders at 6m at mid-high and high dose
(18-19%).
Hematology: Hemoglobin and hematocrit increased
in 6mo male rats. Bilirubin increased in female rats at
6m at high dose. Platelets increased for male and
female rats at 1wk (21%, 19% respectively). No
effect observed at 6m. WBC increased in males at
1wk.
Cells: Eosinphils decreased and lymphocytes
increased in males at 6m. Neutrophils decreased at
6m in both genders. Minimal increases in alveolar
macrophages and sparse brown-appearing
macrophages in all species.
Bacterial Clearance: Mice instilled with bacteria
were mostly unaffected by exposure, except for a
decline in histopathology summary score after 6m.
Tumorigenesis: No values for exposed groups
differed significantly from controls. There was no
evidence of progressive exposure related trend.
Reference: Reed et DE: generated from two 2000
al. (2004, 055625) model 5.9 L Cummins ISM
turbo diesel engines
Co-expoure to 8 gas and 8 solid
exhaust components measured
Particle Size: 0.10 ¦ 0.15/ym
Species: Rat,
Mouse
Gender: Male and
Female
Strain: CDF
(F344)/CrlBR (rat),
A/J (mouse)
Age: 12wks
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: Low: 30 //gfm3
Mid-low: 100 /yglm3
Mid-high: 300/yg/m3
High: 1000 /yglm3
Time to Analysis: 6hfd, 7dfwk for 1wk or 6m.
Analyzed 1d post-exposure.
Organ weights: Kidney weight increased after 6m
for both males and female rats at the high dose.
Kidney and liver weight increased for female mice at
all dose levels at 6m. Lung weight increased at high
dose at 6m for female mice and male rats. Spleen
weight decreased in male mice at the low and mid-
high levels.
Clinical Chemistry: There was a massive decrease
in cholesterol (24%) for rats of both genders after
1wk and a smaller decrease for male rats at 6m.
GGT significantly increased at 6m for male and
female rats at the mid-high and high dose. ALP
increased in male rats at 1 wk by 10%. AST
decreased at mid-high (15%) and high dose in female
rats at 6m. BUN and BUN/Creatine declined (19%,
17%) in female rats at mid-high and high doses after
6m. BUN increased by 21% at mid-low, mid-high and
high doses in male rats at 1wk.
Hematology: WBC decreased in high females after
6m. Factor VII (blood clotting) decreased in MH and
HR males after 1wk and male and female HR after
6m. Thrombin-antithrombin complex declined
massively but only in males after 1wk.
Cells: Minimal increases in alveolar macrophages and
PM within the macrophages were seen.
Cytokines: TNF-a decreased in female rats after
6m.
Tumorigenesis: No significant effect was observed.
July 2009
D-111
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Reed et al. (2008,
156903)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male,
Female
Strain: C57BL/6,
A/J, BALB/c
Age: NR
Weight: NR
GEE (2 1996 General Motors
4.3-L V-6 engines; unleaded
gasoline)
Particle Size: 150nm (MMAD)
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: Control: 2.5±2.9, Low-
exposure: 6.6 ± 3.7, Mid-exposure: 30.3 ±11.8,
High-exposure: 59.1 ±28.3, High filtered
exposure: 2.3 ± 2.6 /yglm3
Time to Analysis: Exposed 6hfd, 7dfwk, 3d-6m.
Body and organ weight and histopathology in
A/J: Kidney weight decreased, but no effects
pertaining to weight were significant. No visible
inflammatory changes were seen.
Lung Damage in A/J: No significant effect was
seen, but hypomethylation was seen in females at
1wk, and methylation was reduced in all exposed
female groups.
Bacteria in lungs of C57BL/6: Exposure did not
affect the clearance of bacteria from the lung.
Respiratory allergic response in BALB/c:
Exposure had little effect, but serum total IgE
increased significantly for the high-exposure group.
Increasing trends were seen in OVA-specific serum
IgE and lgG1, as well as neutrophils and eosinophils.
Reference: Reed et GEE (2 1996 General Motors
al. (2008,156903) 4.3-L V-6 engines: unleaded
Species: Rat gasoline)
Gender: Male,
Female
Strain: CDF
(F344)/CrlBR, SH
Age: NR
Weight: NR
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: Control: 2.5±2.9//g/m3.
Low-exposure: 6.6±3.7/yglm3, Mid-exposure:
30.3± 11.8//g/m3. High-exposure: 59.1 ±28.3
/yg/m3, High filtered exposure: 2.3±2.6/yglm3
Particle Size: 150nm (MMAD)
Time to Analysis: Exposed 6hfd, 7dfwk, 3d-6m.
Body and organ weight and histopathology in
F344: There were no significant effects pertaining to
weight, but heart weight increased and seminal
vesicle weight decreased. No visible inflammatory
changes were seen.
Serum chemistry, hematology, clotting factors
in F344: Serum alanine aminotransferase, aspartate
aminotransferase and phosphorous decreased in
females at 6m in the mid- and high-exposure groups.
Hematocrit, red blood cell count and hemoglobin
increased at 1wk and 6m in males and females in the
mid- and high-exposure groups. Plasma fibrinogen
increased in males at 1wk in the mid-exposure group.
Lung DNA Damage in F344: No significant effect
was seen, but hypermethylation occurred in male
rats at 6m in the mid- and high-exposure groups.
BALF in F344: Generally, in the high-exposure
group, increases were seen in LDH and MIP-2, and
decreases were seen in hydrogen peroxide produced
by unstimulated macrophages and superoxide by both
stimulated and unstimulated macrophages.
SH: HR or ECG parameters were not affected. In the
high-exposure group, lipid peroxides increased in
males and TAT decreased in males and females.
Reference: Reed et
al. (2008,156903)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male,
Female (only
BALB/c)
Strain: C57BL/6,
A/J, BALB/c
Age: NR
Weight: NR
GEE (two 1996 General Motors
4.3-L V-6 engines: regular,
unleaded, non-oxygenated, non-
reformulated gasoline blended
to US average consumption for
summer 2001 and winter
2001-2002-Chevron-Phillips)
Particle Size: MMAD: 150nm
Route: Inhalation Exposure Chamber
Dose/Concentration: PM: Low- 6.6±3.7
/yg/m3, Medium- 30.3 ± 11.8 /yglm3, High-
59.1 ±28.3//g/m3
Time to Analysis: A/J- 2wk quarantine period in
chamber. Exposed 6h/d, 7d/wk, 3d-6m. C57BL/6-
1wk exposure. Instillation of P. aeruginosa.
Killed 18h postinstillation. BALB/c- Conditioned
to exposure chambers and mated. Pregnant
females exposed GD 1 and throughout gestation.
Offspring exposures continued until 4wks-old.
Half of offspring sensitized to OVA. Tested for
airway reactivity by methacholine challenge 48h
post instillation and euthanized.
The kidney weight of female A/J mice decreased at
6m and was strongly related to PM by the removal of
emission PM. PM-containing macrophages increased
by 6m. Hypomethylation occurred in females at 1wk.
The clearance of P. aeruginosa was unaffected by
exposure. Serum total IgE significantly and dose-
dependently increased. OVA-specific IgE and lgG1
gave slight exposure-related evidence but were not
significant.
July 2009
D-112
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Reed et
al. (2008,156903)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male,
Female
Strain: CDF
(F344)/CrlBR, SHR
Age: NR
Weight: NR
GEE (two 1996 General Motors
4.3-L V-6 engines; regular,
unleaded, non-oxygenated, non-
reformulated Chevron-Phillips
gasoline, U.S. average
consumption for summer 2001
and winter 2001-2002)
Particle Size: MMAD: 150nm
Route: Inhalation Exposure Chamber
Dose/Concentration: PM: Low- 6.6±3.7
/yg/m3, Medium- 30.3 ± 11.8 /yg/m3, High-
59.1 ±28.3//g/m3
Time to Analysis: 2wk quarantine period in
chamber. Exposed 6h/d, 7d/wk, 3d-6m. SHR-
surgery to implant telemeter in peritoneal cavity.
4wks recovery. ECG data obtained every 15min
beginning 3d preexposure, 7d exposure, 4d
postexposure.
Organ Weight: At 6m exposure, the heart weights
of male and female rats increased and male rats'
seminal vesicle weight decreased.
Histopathology: PM-containing macrophages
increased by 6m.
Serum Chemistry: Serum alanine aminotransferase,
aspartate aminotransferase, and phosphorus
decreased in medium and high-exposure females.
Hematology, Clotting Factors: Hematocrit, red
blood cell count, and hemoglobin dose-dependently
increased for both genders at both time points.
Plasma fibrinogen increased at 1wk in males.
Lung DNA Damage: Hypermethylation occurred in
medium- and high-exposure male rats at 6m.
BAL: For both genders in the high-exposure group,
LDH and MIP-2 significantly increased at 6m. R0S
decreased at 1wk and 6m. Generally, the production
of hydrogen peroxide and superoxide decreased in the
high-exposure group and medium- and high-exposure
groups, respectively.
CV effects in SHR: Lipid peroxides were
significantly increased in males in the high exposure
group. TAT complexes decreased in females in the
high exposure group.
Removal of Emission PM: The removal of emission
PM strongly linked PM to increased seminal vesicle
weight, red blood cell counts, LDH, lipid peroxides,
and methylation.
Reference:
Rengasamy et al.
(2003,156907)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Weight: — 200g
DEP: SRM1650
CB Elftex-12 furnace black,
Cabot, Boston, MA
Particle Size: NR
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 5,15, or 35 /yg/kg bw
Time to Analysis: single; 1, 3, 5, 7d post
exposure
CYP1A1: DEP at all doses significantly increased
CYP1A1 protein, was maximal at 1d, and normalized
at 5d. CB had no effect.
CYP2B1: DEP and CB at 15 and 35 mg/kg inhibited
activity at 1 d.
Protein level significantly decreased at 1 d with 5,
15 and 35 mg/kg DEP and at 15 and 35 mg/kg CB. A
time dependent decrease was shown at 35mg/kg for
both DEP and CB.
Reference:
Renwick et al.
(2004, 056067)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar
Weight: 370-470g
FCB: Fine Carbon Black (Huber
990)
UCB: Ultrafine Carbon Black
(Printex 90, Degussa)
FT0: Fine Titanium Dioxide
(Tioxide)
UT0: Ultrafine Titanium dioxide
(Degussa)
Particle Size: FCB: 260nm;
UCB: 14nm; FT0: 250nm;
UT0:29nm
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 125 or 500 /yg/rat
Time to Analysis: Single, 24h
BALF Cells: UT0 and UCB induced a large dose-
dependent increase in percent neutrophils (only
statistically significant at 500 /yg for UT0).
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: UT0 and UCB
also increased total protein content only at the 500
/yg dose. UCB induced LDH release at 125 and 500
/yg, UT0 and CB at 500/yg. UT0 and UCB induced
large dose-dependent increases in GGT activity (only
statistically significant at 500 /yg for UT0).
Phagocytosis: All 4 particles decreased but only at
the 500 /yg level.
Chemotaxis: Only UT0 and UCB at 500 /yg/l
increased chemotactic migration.
Reference: Rhoden
et al. (2004,
087969)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Weight: 250-300g
CAPs
(Boston, MA)
Particle Size: CAPS: 0.1-2.5
/ym
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 1060 ± 300/yg/m3
Time to Analysis: Single exposure for 5h.
Analyzed 24 h post exposure.
(CAPS-NAC - CAPS with 50mg/kg bw NAS (N-
acetylcysteine) pretreatment)
Particle Characteristics: Major components did not
appear to show any correlation to total particle
mass. Included Na, Mg, A I, Si, S, CI, K, Ca, Ti, V, Cr,
Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Br, Ba, Pb. Metals Al, Si and Fe
(somewhat less for Pb, Cu, K) correlated with
TBARS.
Oxidative Stress: CAPS increased TBARS and
oxidized protein by 2 + fold. NAS fully prevented the
increase in TBARS and partially prevented an
increase in protein carbonyl.
Tissue Damage: Wet/dry ratio increased with CAPS
but significantly decreased with NAC.
BALF Cells: CAPS increased PMN 4 fold. NAS
treatment reduced this increase to control levels.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: LDH and total
protein not affected. Histology confirms slight
inflammation with CAPS and no inflammation with
CAPs-NAC.
July 2009
D-113
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Rhoden
et al. (2008,
190475)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SD
Age: NR
Weight: 300g
Urban Air Particles (UAP) (SRM
1649)
Particle Size: NR
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 1 mg in 100 //L saline
Time to Analysis: Some rats pre-treated with
MnTBAP 2h prior to UAP exposure. Instilled with
UAP. CL analysis 15min postexposure.
Anesthetized 4h postexposure for BAL
measurements.
UAP significantly increased the total cell number,
PMN, MP0 activity, and protein levels. MnTBAP
prevented UAP-induced lung inflammation. UAP
increased oxidants in lung CL, which was prevented
by MnTBAP.
Reference: Rivero Ambient Air
et al. (2005, (Sao Paulo, Brazil)
088653)
Particle Size: < 2.5/ym
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar
Age: 3m
Weight: 250g
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 100 or 500 //gfrat; 0.4 or
2mg/kg
Time to Analysis: single, 24h
Hematology: Reticulocytes increased at both doses.
At the high dose, hematocrit, percent segmented,
percent neutrophils increased and percent
lymphocytes decreased (relative to control or 100 -
very high variability). Fibrinogen decreased at low
dose but not at high dose.
Histopathology: At both doses, acute alveolar
inflammation was observed and was more
pronounced in the 500 /yg group.
Lung Morphometry: Lumen wall ratio values show
a dose-dependent increase in peribronchial as well as
intra-acinar pulmonary arterioles. No effect in
myocardial arterioles were observed.
Tissue Damage: Increase in the heart wet/dry ratio
at high dose was observed. Lung wet/dry ratios were
unaffected.
Technology: Laser capture microdissection of
airway cells were used to analyze results.
Protein: pERK1/2: ERK1/2 ratio increased by 60%
at 6h and 80% at 24 h. NFkB activity increased at
6h but was not statistically significant.
Reference:
Roberts, E.S.
Charboneau, L.
Espina, V.
2004
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Age: 60-90d
Weight: 300-350g
R0FA: SRI (cyclone power
plant)
Particle Size: NR
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 0.5 mg/rat; 1.67mgfkg
Time to Analysis: Single, 6 and 24 h
Reference: Saber
et al. (2005,
097865)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: TNF(-I-)
(B6,129S-
Tnftm1Gk1),
C57/BL
Age: 9-10wks
DEP: SRM 2975
CB: Printex 90 (Degussa)
Particle Size: DEP: 215nm;
CB: 90nm
Route: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: DEP: 20 mgfm3; CB: 20
mg/m3
Time to Analysis: 90minfd for 4d
consecutively, 1h
BALF Cells: Neutrophils increased significantly to
15% when compared to control (4%) with DEP
exposure. No response difference was observed
between TNF (+/+) and TNF(-/-). CB did not induce
any changes in neutrophil numbers.
Cytokines: IL-6 increased 2-3 fold in DEP and CB
exposure in both normal and knockout mice. IL-1f3
was unaffected.
mRNA: In TNF (+/+) mice, DEP and CB increased
expression of TNF mRNA 2- fold. IL-6 mRNA
expression was high in DEP-exposed knockout mice
when compared to normal mice.
DNA: DNA strand breaks increased in both strains.
Knockout mice showed a higher response to CB and
DEP exposure. For normal mice, only CB induced a
statistically significant effect.
Reference: Schins Soluble fractions
et al. (2004,
054173)
Species: Rat
Gender: Female
Strain: Wistar
Weight: 350-550g
PMC: PMio-2.5
PMF: PM2.6
¦B: Borken, Germany (rural)
¦D: Duisburg, Germany
(industrialized)
Particle Size: PM10 2.5, PM2.6
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 0.32 ± 0.01 mg/rat;
0.91 ± 0.58 mg/kg
Time to Analysis: single, 18h
Radical Formation: Formation of hydroxl radicals
increased with exposure. Relative intensity is as
follows: PMC-D, PMF-D, PMC-B, PMF-B, and control.
Cytokines: TNF-a and IL-8 increased with PMC
from both sites. PMF induced a slight increase in IL-8
but did not induce an increase in TNF-a.
BALF cells: Both PMC showed a massive increase in
neutrophils. PMC-B induced the greatest increase
followed by PMC-D. Both PMF did not induce a
significant increase.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: PMC from
both sites induced markedly higher endotoxin
concentration vs PMF as follows in decreasing order:
PMC-B, PMC-D, PMF-B, PMF-D, control. Glutathione
decreased only for PMC-B. LDH and total protein
were unaffected.
July 2009
D-114
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Seagrave et al.
(2005, 088000)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: F344/DCrl
BR
Aqe: 11 ±1 wk
PM from 3 sources:
NT: New Technology bus,
Detroit Diesel 50G, exhaust
oxidation catalyst, 216 miles,
2002 model - in use
NE: Normal emitter bus, Detroit
Diesel 50G, no catalyst,
134259 miles, 1997 model ¦ in
use
HE: High Emitter bus, Cummins
L1OG, no catalyst, > 250, 000
miles, 1992, retired
Fuel composition very similar
for 3 vehicles: methane (96-
96.8%), ethane (1.6-1.9%),
carbon dioxide (0.9-1.1%),
nitrogen (0.6-0.8%), traces of
other gases
Particle Size: NR
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 0.25 - 2.2 mg/rat in
0.5mL saline
Time to Analysis: Sacrificed 24h post single
instillation.
Engine Specific Emission data: HE had
significantly higher PM and SV0C recovered emission
rates than NE and NT.
Organic mass in PM: The following PM sources are
listed in decreasing order of percent of total mass:
HE, NE, NT.
Total PAH: The following PM sources are listed in
decreasing order of total mass: HE, NT, Control, NE.
Nitro PAH: The following PM sources are also listed
in decreasing order of total mass: NE, HE, Control,
NT. Authors note confounding technical issues
(mostly technique related) with mostly mild effects.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: LDH showed
dose-dependent increases withHE inducing higher
increases than NT and NE. Total protein exhibited
dose-dependent increases with HE, NT and the
positive control SRM2975 inducing higher levels than
NE.
Potency Factors Cytotoxicity and Inflammation:
HE was significantly more potent than NT and NE,
with NT also showing significant potency.
Lung Toxicity: The results were highly variable but
the general toxicity levels in increasing order is the
following: NE, NT, HE, Normal gasoline, diesels, and
high gasolines, though individual factors may differ
greatly.
Reference:
Seagrave et al.
(2006,091291)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: F344|Crl
BR,
Aqe: 11 ±1 wk
PM2.6 sources: BHM: Birming-
ham, Alabama; urban
JST: Jefferson Street, Atlanta,
Georgia; urban
PNS: Pensacola, Florida; urban/
residential
CTR: Centreville, Alabama;
rural
"smoke" - downwind of forest
fires/burns (NR)
Particle Size: PM2.6
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 0.75,1.5, 3 mg/rat
Time to Analysis: Sacrificed 24h post single
instillation.
BALF Total cells and PMN: In general, the winter
samples induced greater increases in potency than
the summer samples except for PNS. For the winter
samples, the samples that induced the greatest
increases, in descending order, are: JST, BHM, CTR,
PNS and Smoke. For the summer, the samples that
induced increases, in descending order, are: BHM,
JST, PNS, and CTR.
BALF macrophages: For the winter, the BHM and
JST samples significantly increased potency whereas
the PNS sample induced significantly negative
potency. For the summer, only the BHM sample
significantly induced potency.
BALF lymphocytes: Only the JST-W and BHM-W
significantly increased potency. The BHM-S, CTR-S
and PNS-S also significantly increased potency.
Histopathological Inflammation: All the winter
and summer samples, excepting PNS, significantly
induced potency.
Lung weight/body weight ratio: In general, for all
end points, JST-S was significantly less potent than
JST-W. The summer samples of BHM and CTR were
also generally more potent than their winter
counterparts.
July 2009
D-115
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Seagrave et al.
(2005, 088000)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male,
Female
Strain: CDF(F-
344)/CrlBR
Age: 10-12wks
DE:
(Two 6 cyl Cummins ISB turbO)
HWS - hardwood smoke
(mixed black/white oak,
uncertified conventional wood
stove)
DE:
EC - 557
OC - 269/yg/m3
NO - 45 ppm
NO2 - 4 ppm
CO - 30 PPM
THV - 2 ppm
HWS:
EC - 43
OC - 908/yg/m3
NO or NO2 - 0 ppm
CO - 13 ppm
THV - 3 ppm
Particle Size: DE: 0.14 ± 1.8
fj m
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 30,100, 300,1000
/yg/m3TPM
HWS: 0.36 ± 2.1 fjm (MMAD + GSD
Time to Analysis: 6hfd, 7dfwk for 6m. 1d post-
exposure
Particle Characteristics: Major differences K:
HWS > > DE; Ca DE > > HWS; Zn: DE > > HWS.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: LDH was
unaffected by DE. Exposure to HWS induced an
increase for males only at 100 and 300 but not at
1000/yglm3. Protein was unaffected by DE. HWS
exposure showed male-only effects at 100 and 300
/yg/m3 but not at 1000. AP was unaffected by DE or
HWS except for slight decline induced by HWS at
1000 /yglm3 for both genders.
Other: P glucose was unaffected by DE. HWS-
exposed females showed decreased fB-glucose at
100 and 300 but not at 1000/yg/m3.
BALF GSH to (GSH+ GSSG): No effects for DE
were observed. HWS significantly decreased the
ratio in both males and females at 1000 //gfm3. The
effect for females was greater than the male effect.
BALF Cells: No effects were observed except for an
increase in macrophages at 30 /yglm3 for HWS males
exposed to HWS.
Cytokines: IL-1 (3 was unaffected by DE or HWS.
MIP-2 decreased for both genders at 1000 HWS.
TNF-a decreased in females with DE exposure. No
TNF-a effects for HWS were observed.
Reference:
Seagrave et al.
(2008,191990)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SD
Age: 10-12wks
Weight: 250-300g
GEE (2 1996 General Motors
4.3-L V6 gasoline engines;
conventional Chevron Phillips
gasoline, U.S. average
composition) (CO, NO, NO2,
SO2, THC) (PM2.6 composition-
EC, 0C, S04, NH4, NOs)
Simulated downwind coal
emission atmospheres (SDCAs)
(fly ash, gas-phase pollutants,
sulfate aerosols, NO, NO2, SO2)
Paved Road Dust (RD) (Los
Angeles, CA; New York City,
NY; Atlanta, GA)
Particle Size: GEE: MMAD-
150nm, RD: 2.6 ± 1.7 fjm,
SDCA: 0.1-1.O^/m
Route: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: GEE: 60//gfm3, SDCAs:
317-1072/yglm3, RD: 306-954//gfm3; GEE: CO-
104ppm, NO- 16.7ppm, N02- 1.1 ppm, S02-
1 .Oppm, THC- 12ppm; SDCAs: CO- < 1 ppm, NO-
0.19-0.62ppm, N02- 0.10-0.37ppm, S02- 0.07-
0.24ppm, THC- < 1ppm
Time to Analysis: Quarantined 2wks. 6h
exposure then ip injected. Cannula ligated into
trachea and connected to rodent ventilator.
Thorax and abdomen opened. Killed after
measurements taken.
GEE produced CL in the lungs, heart, and liver. RD
produced a significant effect in the heart at the low
dose. SDCAs had no effect on CL. RD significantly
increased the heart's oxidative stress, as
demonstrated by the TBARS levels. GEE did not
affect the amount of macrophages or PMN. SDCAs
increased macrophages. The RD low dose increased
macrophages and PMN. SDCAs increased Pur* values
and tidal volumes.
Reference: Singh
et al. (2004,
087472)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: CD-1
Age: 6-8wks
A-DEP
(4cyl light duty 2.7I Isuzu diesel
at 6 kgfni]
DEP: SRM 2975
Particle Size: A-DEP >50
fj m
Route: Oropharyngeal Aspiration
Dose/Concentration: 25 or 100//gfmouse
Time to Analysis: single, 4h
(18h post-exposure measurements taken but NR
due to similar results)
Particle Characteristics: DEP had 60% EC vs 9%
in A-DEP. A-DEP had 50% OC vs 5% in DEP.
Phenanthrene and Fluoranthene fractions were much
more prevalent in PAH from DEP than A-DEP.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: Microalbumin
increased for both pollutants except DEP induced
increases only at 100/yg. Endotoxin increased
microalbumin. NAG increased with 100 /yg A-DEP.
BALF Cells: PMNs significantly increased dose-
dependently with DEP and remained elevated at 18h.
Endotoxin induced the greatest increases of PMNs.
Macrophages increased with A-DEP and were
unaffected by DEP.
Cytokines: Endotoxin induced massive responses for
IL-6, MIP-2 and TNF-a but no response from IL-5. A-
DEP increased all 4 cytokines but only at the 100//g
dose level. Similarly, DEP only increased IL-6 at the
100/yg dose level.
July 2009
D-116
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Smith CAPs
et al. (2003, (Fresno, CA)
042107)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Aqe: 11-12wks
Particle Size: <2.5//m
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 6 exp in 2 sets of 3:
FalM - 847 /yglm3
Fall2 - 260/yg|m3
Fall3 - 369/yg|m3
Winterl - 815/yg/m3
Winter2 - 190/yg/m3
Winter3 - 371 /yglm3
Time to Analysis: 4hfd for 3 consecutive days.
Parameters measured immediately following last
exposure.
Particle Characteristics: Nitrate showed the
highest variability near 10 fold, followed by Si, S and
EC. 0C concentration was relatively consistent.
Metals otherwise appeared proportionate to the
concentrations.
BALF Cells: Total cells increased at wk1. Percent of
macrophages reduced in wk2 with CAPs. Number of
neutrophils increased with CAPs, but only achieved
statistical significance during wk1 of the fall and
winter. Lymphocytes increased but were not
statistically significant.
BAL cell permeability: Upon CAPs exposure, the
proportion of nonviable cells were increased up to
242% when compared to controls. The fall of wk2
induced the highest significant increases followed by
fall wk1, fall wk3, and winter wk3.
Reference: Smith CFA: Coal Fly Ash (400 MW, Route: Nose-only Inhalation
et al. (2006,
110864)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Age: 8wks
Weight: 260-270g
Wasatch Plateau, Utah)
(aerodynamic separation)
Particle Size: 0.4-2.5 /jm
Dose/Concentration: 1400 //gfm3 PM2.6
including 600/yg/m3 PM1
Time to Analysis: 4hfd for 3 consecutive days.
Parameters measured 18 or 36h post-exposure.
BALF Cells: Percent and total number of neutrophils
in BALF and blood increased significantly at both 18
and 36h. Percent of macrophages decreased slightly
while number of macrophages increased in
bronchiole-alveolar duct regions at both time periods.
Cytokines: MIP-2 and transferrin increased at 18h.
IL-1 (3 increased at 36h.
Hematology: Plasma protein increased at 18h.
Lymphocyte and hematocrit percentage decreased at
36h.
Other: Gamma glutamyl transferase decreased at
36h. Lung antioxidant increased at 18h.
Reference: Song et DEP collected from a 4JB1 -
al. (2008,156093) type, light-duty (2740 cc), four-
Species: Mouse, cV.linder diesel engine operated
using standard diesel fuel at
Gender: Ffemale, speeds of 1500 rpm under a
Strain: BALB/c, load of 10 torque.
e: 5-6wks
Particle Size: 0.4 fjm (mean
diameter)
Route: Intranasal Instillation (days 1-5), Whole-
body Exposure Chamber (days 6-8)
Dose/Concentration: O.Gmg/mL in 50 /jl of
saline (days 1 -5), 6mg/m3 for 1 h/d for 3d (days
6-8).
Time to Analysis: Enhanced Pause (Penh),
measured on day 9. BAL and lung tissues
collected on day 10.
Airway Hyper-Responsiveness: Intranasal
exposure plus aerosolized DEP caused a significant
increase in methacholine-induced Penh over the
control.
BAL Fluid Analysis: There was no significant
increase in IFN-y in the BAL fluid following DEP
treatment but there was a significant increase in IL-4
levels compared to the control. (IL-4 increase could
indicate that DEP modulates Th-2 cytokines in the
mouse model). DEP also induced an increase in total
neutrophils and lymphocytes in the BAL when
compared to the control. The nitrite concentration in
BAL (indicating NO generation) was significantly
greater in the DEP exposed group than the control.
Histological Assessment: Peribronchial and
perivascular infiltrates were more common in the
group exposed to DEP than the control.
Ym1 and Ym2 Expression: (see explanation in
comments section) Ym1 and Ym2 transcripts were
upregulated in response to DEP exposure in mice.
Reference:
Steerenberg et al.
(2006, 088249)
Species: Rat
Strain: Crl/WKY
Ambient air samples
PMC, PMF:
¦I: Rome, Italy
¦N: Oslo, Norway
¦PL: Lodz, Poland
¦NL: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Measured Components: Li, Be,
B, Na, Mg, A I, K, Ca, Ti, V,Cr,
Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Se,
Sr, Mo, Cd, Sn, Sb, Ba, Ce, Nd,
Sm, Au, Hg, TI, Pb, Bi, U, Si,
Endotoxins, CI, NO-, SO4
Particle Size: PMC: 2.35-8.5
fjm; PMF: 0.12-2.35 fim
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 1 and 2.5mgfanimal
Time to Analysis: Parameters measured 24h
post single exposure
Particle Characteristics: Concentrations of metals
were highest in Rome. Amsterdam was noted for
high Mg and V. Lodz was noted for high Pb, Zn, PAH.
More of PMC was composed of Fe, Mn, Al, Cr, Cu.
More of PMF, on the other hand, was composed of
Zn, Pb, Ni, V.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: CC16
decreased substantially. Crustal material (endotoxin,
Na, CI and metals but not Ti, As, Cd, Zn, V, Ni, Se)
was positively associated with short term CC16.
Albumin increased.
Cytokines: MIP-2 increased dose-dependently. TNF-
a also increased.
BALF Cells: PMNs increased.
July 2009
D-117
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Stinn
et al. (2005,
088307)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male and
Female
Strain: Crl: (WIU
BR
Aqe: 40d
DE
(generated from 1.6 L VW
diesel under USFTP 72)
CO: 10, 37 ppm
CO2: 2170, 6540 ppm
NO: 7.0, 22.8 ppm
NOx: 8.6, 28.3 ppm
SO2: 0.83, 3.09 ppm
NH4: ND
Measured Major Components:
NO, SO2,1 -nitropyrene, Zi.
50% by DE weight is elemental
carbon.
Particle Size: 3mg/m3: 0.19
fjm (MMAD)
Route: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 3 and 10 mgfm3
10 mg/m3: 0.21 /jm
(MMAD)
Time to Analysis: 6hfd, 7dfwk for 24m; 6 m
postexposure
Body Weight: Mean weight increased substantially
during the first few weeks in all groups. Food
consumption decreased in 1-24mo but was recovered
in 24-30mo. Body weight decreased at 23mo in all
categories, but recovered except in high dose males
at 30mo.
Organ Weight: Absolute weight of lungs, larynx and
trachea increased from 0 to 12 to 24mo and stayed
elevated at 30 mo: Low < Hi, male ~ female.
Pulmonary Parameters: Respiratory frequency,
tidal volume, and minute volume were unaffected in
any group measured between 3 and 24mo.
Elemental carbon increased dose-dependently in
exposure groups. No maleffemale difference was
observed, but increases were greater at 24 mo than
at 18 mo.
BALF Cells: PMNs and lymphocytes showed dose
and time-dependent effects at 18 and 24 mo (no
data at 30 mo). Lymphocytes increased 50 fold in
high dose males at 24mo. Peripheral monocytes and
neutrophils increased 3 fold in DE groups at the end
of the study. Particle-filled macrophages in alveolar
lumen and interstitium increased at 12, 24, 30mo in
both genders at all dose levels.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: LDH
increased in dose and time-dependent manner.
Hematology: Erythrocytes were unaffected (12, 24,
30) except in high dose females at 24 and 30 mo.
Hemoglobin and hematocrit increased dose-
dependently with no gender differences. Leukocytes
increased in a dose- and time-dependent manner.
Nasal Cavity Histopathology: All effects were
resolved at 30 mo. Nasal cavity hyperplasia
increased at the high dose at 12 and 24mo in both
genders. Squamous metaplasia of respiratory
epithelium increased in high dose females (12,
24mo).
Larynx Histopathology: No effects were observed.
Lung Histopathology: Alveolar region hyperplasia of
alveolar epithelium increased at 12, 24, 30mo in both
genders at all dose levels except for 12mo low dose
males and females. Above lung histopathology was
not time-dependent, though perhaps some small
dose-dependence was observed.The following
histopathology findings showed strong dose- and
time-dependent increases that occurred in both
genders (24-30 mo): goblet cell hyperplasia of
bronchial epithelia, cuboidalfcolumnar hyperplasia of
alveolar epithelium, chronic active inflammation and
septal fibrosis.
Tumorigenicity: Lung tumors were more prevalent
in females than males and appeared to be dose-
dependent. The major 3 types of tumors are the
following:: bronchio-alveolar adenoma, bronchiolo-
alveolar adenoma and benign keratinizing cystic cell
tumors. Enhanced effects in females versus males
may be the result of enhanced metabolism (body
volume versus body weight) and increased repiratory
volumefbw for females.
July 2009
D-118
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Sureshkumar et al.
(2005, 088306)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: Swiss
Age: 10-12wks
Weight: 20-25g
GE: Gasoline Exhaust
(Honda generator EBK 1200,
four stroke one cyl)
Including: SO2 - 0.11 mg/m3
NOx - 0.49 mg/m3
CO - 18.7 ppm
Particle Size: GE
>4/ym - 34.1 %
3-4/ym - 15.8%
2-3/ym - 15.8%
1.5-2 /jm - 10.6%
0.5-1.5//m - 5.3%
< 0.5 fjm - 18.4 %
Route: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 0.635 mgfm3
Time to Analysis: 15min/d 7,14 or 21 d.
Parameters measured
less than 1h post-exposure
Cytokines: GE caused time-dependent increases in
TNF-a and IL-6. IL-10 and IL-1 (3 were unaffected.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: y-GGT, ALP
and LDH increased after 2wks of GE exposure and
stayed stable at 21 d. Total protein slightly increased
on 14 and 21 d, though these increases were not
statistically significant.
BALF Cells: Neutrophils (%) increased at 7,14 and
21 d (stable). Total cell count, macrophages and
eosinophils were unaffected. Leukocytes and
lymphocytes increased, though not significantly.
Histopathology: Minor changes at 7d, mild edema in
alveolar region at 14d and sloughing of epithelial
cells in bronchiolar region and focal accumulation of
inflammatory cells in alveolar region at 21 d were
observed in a time-dependent manner.
Reference:
Tesfaigzi et al.
(2002, 025575)
Species: Rat
Gender: NR
Strain: Brown-
Norway
Age: 7-8wks
Weight: 310-330g
WS (wood stove- Vogelzang
Boxwood Stove, Model BX-
42E, wood- Pinus edulis) (CO,
NO, N0>, total hydrocarbon)
Particle Size: Smaller size
fraction: 0.405-0.496/jm,
larger size fraction: 6.7-11.7
fj m
Route: Whole-body Exposure
Dose/Concentration: Target concentration
(low, high exposure): 1,10mg/m3; CO-15-
106.4ppm, NO- 2.2-18.9ppm, NOx- 2.4-19.7ppm,
total hydrocarbon- 3.5-13.8ppm
Time to Analysis: Exposed 3hfd, 5dfwk, 4 or
12wks.
Respiratory: Total pulmonary resistance increased
for exposure groups and was significant for the low-
exposure group. In exposed groups, forced expiratory
flows and quasistatic compliance were lower and
dynamic lung compliance higher, the latter being
significant for the high-exposure group. For the high-
exposure group, vital capacity slightly decreased,
residual volume slightly increased, and CO-diffusing
capacity had a slight, significant decrease.
Histopathology: WS caused minimal to mild chronic
inflammation in the epiglottis of the larynx. PAS-
positive cells increased in the 30d high-exposure
group. AMs increased with time and concentration.
Particle-laden macrophages were seen after 90d. AB-
and PAS-positive epithelial cells increased for the
90d low-exposure group.
BALF: Macrophages decreased significantly in the
high-exposure group. Particle-laden macrophages
increased with concentration. Lymphocytes and
neutrophils slightly increased in the high-exposure
group.
Cytokines: LDH increased slightly and protein levels
decreased slightly in the high-exposure group.
Cytokines were below detectable levels.
Reference: Tin-Tin-
Win-Shwe et al.
(2006,088415)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: BALB/c
Age: 7wks
CB14: Printex 90 (Degussa)
CB90: Flammruss 101
(Degussa)
Particle Size: CB14:14nm
CB95: 95 nm
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 25,125, 625 //gfmouse;
approx. 1, 5, 25mg/kg
Time to Analysis: 1fwk for 4wks. mRNA
expression in lungs and mediastinal lymph nodes
measured 4h post exposure
Body weight, thymus, spleens, splenic cell
count: No effects were observed.
BALF Cells: Increased total cell numbers were
observed for 125, 625/yg CB14 (dose-dependent)
and 625/yg CB95. Total cell count was twice as high
for CB14 at 125 and 625 //g compared to CB95. AM
numbers exhibited a dose-dependent response for
both CB14 and CB95 for all doses except 125//g.
Lymphocyte numbers increased at 125 and 625/yg
for CB14 and 625/yg for CB95. PMN numbers
increased at 125 and 625/yg for CB14 and CB95,
but the response was greater with CB14. PMN
numbers were proportional to dose surface area for
both PM sizes.
BALF Cytokines: CB14 and CB95 induced dose-
dependent increases in IL-1 (3. TNF-a increased at
125 and 625/yg dose in CB14 with the 125 dose
inducing a slightly greater increase. CB14 and CB95
induced CCL-3 increases 125 and 625/yg.
Chemokine mRNA in lung and lymph nodes: CCL-
3 mRNA increased for CB14 but not CB95 4h
following the last exposure. CCL-2 was unchanged.
Mediastinal lymph nodes: The number of CB-laden
phagocytes increased in a dose-dependent manner
for CB14 and CB95. CB14 had higher numbers at all
doses compared to CB95.
July 2009
D-119
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Tong et
al. (2006, 097699)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: KP600 CD-
1
Weight: 22-26g
PM2.E (collected from stacked
filter air sampler in Shanghai,
China)
Fe: FeS04
Zn: ZnS04
PMF: PM2.6 + FeS04
PMFZ: PM2.B + FeS04 +
ZnS04
Major Measured Components:
Fe 26ppm, Zn 9ppm, S 61 ppm
Particle Size: PM2.6
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: PM: 25mgfmL,
1mg|mouse
Fe: 15mg/mL, 0.6 mg/mouse
Zn: 15mg/mL, 0.6 mg/mouse
PMF: PM 25mg/mL + Fe 15mg/mL,
1.6mg|mouse
PMFZ: PM 25 mglmL + Fe15mg|mL,
1.6mg|mouse
Time to Analysis: Instilled twice at 0 and 24h.
Parameters measured 24h following last
exposure (at 48h).
Synchrotron X-ray imaging (in vivo): PMFZ
showed the greatest increase in alveolar changes. Fe
induced more hemorrhagic changes, whereas Zn
induced more nonuniformity of lung texture. This
suggests that Zn induces PBMC in a dose-dependent
manner which releases IL-1, IL-6, TNF-a, and IFN-y.
Histopathology: PMFZ induced the most severe
changes including serious inflammation/pus in
bronchia and bronchial epidermal cell hyperplasia. For
Fe or PMF hemorrhagic changes predominated but
were less severe than PMFZ.
Reference:
Upadhyay et al.
(2008,159345)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SHR
Age: 6m
Weight: NR
Ultrafine Carbon Particles
(UFCP)
Particle Size: Size-
31 ±0.3nm, MMAD- 46nm,
Surface area concentration-
0.139 m2(particle)/m3(air),
Mass specific surface area-
807m2/g
Route: Whole-body Exposure
Dose/Concentration: 172//gfm:l
Time to Analysis: Acclimatized 2d. 1 d baseline.
24h exposure. 4d recovery. Sacrificed 1st or 3,d
day of recovery.
Cardiophysiology: The mean arterial BP and HR
increased but returned to baseline levels by the 4th
recovery day. SDNN and HRV decreased. RMSSD
and LF/HF decreased but were not significant.
Pulmonary Inflammation: UFCP did not cause
pulmonary inflammation.
Pulmonary and Cardiac Tissue: HO-1, ET-1, ETA,
ETB, TF, PAI-1 significantly increased in the lung on
the 3,d recovery day. HO-1 was repressed in the
heart, but the other markers had slight,
nonsignificant increases.
Systemic Responses: Neutrophil and lymphocyte
cell differentials significantly increased on the 1st
recovery day. Other blood parameters were
unaffected. The plasma renin concentration
increased on the first 2 recovery days. Ang I and II
concentrations increased on the 1st recovery day but
was not significant.
Reference:
Wallenborn et al.
(2007,156144)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: WKY,
SHRWKY, and
stroke-prone SH
(SHRSP)
Age: 12-15wks
PM: precipator unit power
plant residual oil combustion
Particle Size: PM: 3.76/ym
(bulk) ± 2.15
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: WKY vs SHRSP: 1.11,
3.33, 8.33 mg/kg
SH vs SHRSP: 3.33, 8.33 mg/kg
Time to Analysis: WKY vs SHRSP: single
exposure, parameters measured 24h post-
exposure.
SH vs SHRSP: single exposure, parameters
measured 24h post-exposure.
Note: 4h post exposure study done on WKY vs
SHRSP but not published.
BALF Cells: A dose-dependent increase in total cells
and neutrophils was observed. Equal response for all
3 strains except for SH, for both concentrations was
observed.
BALF inflammation/Injury Markers: LDH exhibited
a dose-dependent increase in equal response for all 3
strains. WKY had higher baseline levels of NAG
activity but, upon PM exposure, SHRSP induced
higher increases than WKY. GGT exhibited a dose-
dependent response for all 3 strains. SHRSP showed
the highest increase followed by WKY and SH.
Protein levels increased at the high dose level with
SHRSP exhibiting the highest increases followed by
SH and WKY. Albumin levels were inconsistent
between experiments.
Oxidative Stress - Lung: (WKY vs SHRSP only):
SOD decreased following increased exposure levels
with SHRSP levels generally higher than WKY.
Ferritin levels declined only in SHRSP.
Oxidative Stress - Cardiac: SOD increased in the
SHRSP vs WKY experiment only. Only SHRSP at
8.33 mg/kg showed a significant increase when
compared to the control.
GPx: No action but SHRSP levels were similar to
SHR and, in the WKY vs SHRSP experiment, SHRSP
exhibited higher activity level than WKY.
Ferritin: Equivocal results were observed. Levels
decreased at the high dose for WKY and SHRSP but
increased at medium doses for SH and SHRSP.
ICDH: Levels increased for WKY and decreased for
SHRSP.
July 2009
D-120
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Wallenborn et al.
(2008,191171)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar
Kyoto (WKY)
Age: 13wks
Weight: NR
Zinc Sulfate (ZnS04,
aerosolized)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 9.0 ±2.1 fjg zinc/m3,
35 ±8.1 /yg zinc/m3,123.2 ±29.6 /yg zinc/m3
Time to Analysis: Exposed 5h/d, 3d/wk,
16wks. Half of the rats used for plasma/serum
analysis, other half for isolation of cardiac
mitochondria.
A trend toward increased BALF protein was seen.
Cardiac mitochondrial ferritin had a small, significant
increase. Mitochondrial succinate dehydrogenase and
glutathione peroxidase had small, significant
decreases. Subchronic exposure to 100/yg/m3
caused expression changes of cardiac genes involved
with cell signaling events, ion channels regulation,
and coagulation. No pulmonary-related effects were
seen.
Reference: Ambient PM2.6 PM10
Wegesser and Last Collected from San Joaquin
(2008,190506) Valley, CA
Species: Mouse Particle Size: PM10 2 E
Gender: Male
Strain: BALB/c
Aqe: 8-10wks
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 25-50 /yg/mouse
Time to Analysis: 3, 6,18, 24, 48, 72h post IT
instillation.
BALF Cells: Increased amount of viable cells found
in PM-exposed mice with dose-response relationship
between dose of PM and number of total cells
recovered in BALF. At 6h, increased numbers of
macrophages at both 25 and 50/yg/mouse. Increased
percentage of neutrophils observed with 50
/yg/mouse PM only. Furthermore, both macrophages
and neutrophils increased with longer time period
from instillation, peaking at 24 h.
MIP-2: At 50/yg/mouse, MIP-2 concentrations
increased, peaking at 3h, though not statistically
significant and returned to basal levels by 6h.
Positive correlation observed between MIP-2
concentration and increased neutrophil counts. No
correlation found between MIP-2 and macrophages.
Reference:
Whitekus et al.
(2002,157142)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: BALB/c
Age: 6-8wks
Weight: NR
DEP (light-duty, four-cylinder
engine- 4JB1 type, Isuzu
Automobile, Japan; standard
diesel fuel) (extracts)
Particle Size: 0.5-4/ym
Route: Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 200, 600, 2000/yg/m3
Time to Analysis: Exposed 1 h/d 10d. Animals
receiving OVA had 20min OVA exposure after
DEP exposure.
DEP+0VA dose-dependently increased IgE and IgG 1,
being more effective than the OVA-alone treatment.
This effect was significantly suppressed by thiol
antioxidants NAC or BUC. DEP + 0VA increased
carbonyl protein and lipid peroxide over OVA. NAC or
BUC suppressed lipid peroxide and protein oxidation.
No general markers for inflammation were observed.
Reference:
Wichers et al.
(2004, 055636)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SH
Age: 75d
PM (HP-12): inside wall of
stack of Boston, MA power
plant burning # 6 oil.
Particle Size: PM: 3.76 /ym :
2.15
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 0.83, 3.33 or 8.33 mg/kg
Time to Analysis: single, 6h for Whole-body
plethysmographs (WBP) and repeated daily for 4-
7d,
96 or 192h post exposure
non-WBP animals: single,
24, 96,192h post exposure
Tidal Volume: A dose-dependent decrease in tidal
volume (45 % at high dose) was sustained for 1d
with very slow recovery over 7d.
Breathing frequency: Dose-dependent increase
(100 % at high dose) with recovery at 7d was
observed.
Minute ventilation: Small dose-dependent increases
were observed with a return to normal ventilation in
2d.
Penh (enhanced pause): Equivocal results in all
groups were observed (due to major control
variation).
BALF Cells: Dose-dependent increases in total cells
at 24 h, with declined, but still elevated, levels at
192h. Neutrophils increased significantly (10 fold) at
24 h in the mid and high dose groupsand showed
declined, but still elevated, levels at 192h.
Macrophages slowly increased in a dose-dependent
manner at 192h.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: Protein and
albumin increased at 24 h, returned to relative basal
level at 192h at the mid and high dose levels. NAG
exhibited dose-dependent increases at 24h and
sustained these levels through 192h.
July 2009
D-121
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Wichers LB et al.
(2006,103806)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: SH
Age: 71 -73d
Weight: 255-278g
PM (HP-12): inside wall of
stack of Boston, MA power
plant burning # 6 oil.
Particle Size: 1.95/ym ±
3.49
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 13 mgfm3
Time to Analysis: Phase I: 1 st day, filtered air,
2nd day, 6h of PM
Phase II: 1 st Da, y filtered air, 4 days of 6h PM
each
Immediate post-exposure
Body/ Lung weight: No effects on Phase I rats were
observed. HP-12 exposure increased body weight,
left lung, right intercostal, and right diaphragmatic
lobes in Phase II rats. However, results appeared due
to normal growth apptern in juvenile rats over 4d.
Lung lobe to Body Weight Ratio: No effects at 1
or 4d were observed.
Deposition calculations: V and Co were used to
estimate deposition rates (good correlation between
two metals at R2 - 0.94). Total HP-12 deposition
using Co was 26 and 99/yg (for 1 day and 4 day
experiments) and using V was 31 and 116/yg.
Modeling information estimated HP-12 deposition at
43% in conducting airways and 57% in alveolar
region.
Breathing parameters: No changes were observed
for 1 or 4d studies except for a possible decrease in
frequency for the 1d study.
Reference: Witten
et al. (2005,
087485)
Species: Rat
Gender: Female
Strain: F344
Age: 8wks
Weight: — 175g
DEP (heavy-duty Cummins N14
research engine operated at
75% throttle)
Particle Size: 7.234-
294.27nm
Route: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: Low- 35.3±4.9//g/m3,
High- 632.9±47.61 //g/m3
Time to Analysis: Exposed 4hfd, 5dfwk, 3wks.
Pretreated with saline or capsaicin.
There were no differences for substance P. The low-
exposure group had significantly less NK1. DEP
reduced NEP activity. Plasma extraversion dose-
dependently increased and was greatest in capsaicin
animals. Respiratory permeability dose-dependently
increased. IL-1 (3 was significantly higher for the low-
exposure group. IL-12 was significantly lower in the
capsaicin high-expsoure group. TNF-a increased in
the high-exposure group and capsaicin low-exposure
group. High exposure induced particle-laden AMs in
the lungs, perivascular cuffing consisting of
mononuclear cells, alveolar edema and increased
mast cell number. Neutrophil and eosinophil influx
was not seen.
Reference: Wong
et al. (2003,
097707)
Species: Rat
Gender: Female
Strain: F344/NH
Age: ~4wks
Weight: — 175g
DEP (Cummins N14 research
engine at 75% throttle) (EC-
34.93-601.67 //g/m3, 0C-
1.90-11.25 /yglm3, Sulfates
0.94-17.96/yg|m3,Na- 4.07-
4.78 ng/m3, Mg- 0.60-0.86
ng/m3, Ca- 5.05-10.66 ng/m3,
Fe- 3.17-6.44, Cr- 0.68-1.31
ng/m3, Mn- 0.11-0.22 ng/m3,
Pb- 0.97-1.24 ng/m3)
Particle Size: 7.5-294.3nm
Route: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: Low- 35.3±4.9/yg/m3,
High- 669.3±47.6/yg/m3
Time to Analysis: Exposed 4h/d, 5d/wk, 3wks.
Pretreated with saline or capsaicin.
DEP dose-dependently increased plasma
extraversion, which was further increased by
capsaicin. In the high-exposure group, particle-laden
AMs (which were reduced by capsaicin),
inflammatory cell margination, perivascular cuffing
with subsequent mononuclear cell migration and
dispersal, increased mast cells, and decreased
substance P were all seen. NK-1R was
downregulated in the low-exposure group and
upregulated in the capsaicin-pretreated high-exposure
group. NEP decreased significantly for both groups.
Reference: Wu, W. Zn2 -t
Wang, X.
Zhang, W.
2003
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Aqe: 60d
Particle Size: NA
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 50 /ym/rat
Time to Analysis: Single, 24 h
Cells: Decreased number of airway epithelial cells
shown with PTEN protein immunostaining.
Macrophages were unaffected.
July 2009
D-122
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Route:
Yamamoto et al.
(2006,096671)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: BALB/c
Age: 7wks
Weight: 23g
CB14: Printex 90 (Degussa)
CB95: Flammruss 101
(Degussa)
LTA: Lipoteichoic acid
14CL: CB14 + LTA
95CL: CB95 + LTA
CB14 measured Components: C
96.79%, HR 0.19%, NO.13%,
S 0.11%, Ash 0.05%, 0 2.74%
CB95 measured Components: C
97.98%, HR 0.15%, N 0.28%,
S 0.46%, Ash 0%, 0 1.14%
Particle Size: CB14: 14nm
CB95: 90 nm
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: CB14: 0, 25,125, 625
//gfmouse
CB95: 0, 25,125, 625/yg/mouse
LTA: 10 or 50 /yg/mouse
14CL: 125 /yg CB14 + 10 or 50 //g LTA
95CL: 125/yg CB95 + 10 or 50/yg LTA
Time to Analysis: Single, 4 and 24h
BALF Cells: CB95 induced dose-dependent increases
of PMN. CB14 induced an increase in PMNs but the
increases were not dose-dependent. LTA massively
increased PMN. LTA induced dose-dependent
increases in total cells, especially at high dose at
24 h. LTA had massive synergistic effect with CB14
and CB95 for total cells and PMNs. Total cell count
and PMN levels were highest in 14CL with levels at
24h higher than at 4h. Macrophage data were
inconsistent.
Cytokines: CB95 induced dose-dependent increases
in IL-6, TNF-a, CCL2 and CCL3. CB14 induced dose-
dependent increase in CCL2 and CCL3. Exposure
induced increases of IL-6 at the high dose only. Slight
effect on TNF-a was observed. LTA induced dose-
dependent increases of IL-6, TNF-a and CCL3. 14CL
massively induced IL-6 and CCL2. No combination of
CB and LTA affected TNF-a or CCL3.
mRNA Expression: LTA, 14CL and 95CL increased
TLR2 mRNA expression with 95CL and 14CL
inducing higher increases than LTA. No effect on
TLR4 mRNA expression was observed.
Reference:
Yanagisawa et al.
(2003, 087487)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: ICR
Age: 6wks
Weight: 29-33g
DEP:
(4JB1 light duty 4cyc 2, 74
liter Isuzu engine)
LPS
DEP-OC: organic compounds
DL: DEP + LPS
DOL: DEP-OC + LPS
Particle Size: 0.4 /jm
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: DEP/DEP-OC: 125
//gfmouse
LPS: 75 /yg/mouse
Time to Analysis: Single, 24 h
BALF Cells: DEP and DEP-OC increased neutrophils
but the increases were not statistically significant.
LPS increased neutrophils significantly. DL and DOL
massively increased neutrophils at greater levels than
LPS alone. Macrophages were unaffected.
Pulmonary Edema: LPS, DEP and DEP-OC increased
edema. DL further increased this effect. DOL had no
effect compared to LPS alone.
Histology: DL elevated neutrophil inflammation
interstitial edema and alveolar hemorrhages. DOL
induced neutrophilic inflammation without the
alveolar hemorrhages.
Cytokines: LPS increased IL-1 (3, MIP-1a, MCP-1
and KC. DEP and DEP-OC had no effect. DL induced
further increases. DOL decreased cytokines
compared to LPS alone. DEP-OC increased IL-1 (3 and
MIP-1a mRNA expression slightly. DEP had no
effect. LPS significantly increased IL-1 (3 and MIP-1a
mRNA expression. DL increased expressions while
DOL did not.
mRNA Expression of TLRs: DEP-OC, DL, DOL and
LPS increased TLR2. DEP had no effect. All particles
increased TLR4 mRNA expression.
July 2009
D-123
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Yokohira et al.
(2007,097976)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: F344/
DuCrj
Aqe: 10wks
DQ-12: Quartz dust (Douche
Montan)
HT: Hydrotalcite (Kyoward
500, PL-1686, KYOWA)
POF: Potassium Octatitanate
fiber (TISMO, Otsuka)
PdO: Palladium Oxide
CB: Carbon Black (Mitsubishi
Kasei)
Particle Size: DQ12 < 7/ym
HT: 7.8 ±1.5^m
POF: <50um length: <2//m
width
PdO: 0.54 ±1.11 //m
CB: 28nm
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 4mg/rat in 0.2ml saline
Time to Analysis: Single, 1 and 28d
Lung weight/body weight ratio: DQ-12, HT and
POF induced increases after 1 d. After 28 days, all
samples induced increases in lung weight.
BALF Cells: Neutrophils increased significantly in
walls and alveolar spaces in all groups on 1d except
at HT. AT 28d, this increase was maintained only in
walls with severe and moderate elevations, except
for DQ-12.
Histopathology: DQ-12 caused pulmonary edema
both at 1 and 28d. PdO and CB induced edema at
28d. Fibrosis was observed after 28d with the most
significant increase, in decreasing order, induced by
DQ-12,PdO, POF, HT, CB, and the control. Histiocyte
infiltration was observed after 1 d for DQ-12, POF
and PdO. At 28d, infiltration was observed for DQ-
12, HT, POF and PdO. Restructuring of alveolar walls
and microgranulation was observed for all 5 particles
but only at 28d with DQ 12, PdO, HT, POF, CB and
control.
Immunohistochemistry: BrdU: At 1 d all 5 particles
elevated in both area and number. Activity declined
after 28d but was still higher than the control.
iNOS: At 1d DQ-12, POF and PdO induced increases.
At 28d, DQ-12 and HT induced increases.
MMP-3: DQ-12 induced increases at both 1 and 28d
and PdO at 28d.
Toxicity scoring: The levels of toxicity are, in
decreasing order, as follows: DQ-12, HT/PdO/POF,
and CB.
Reference: Zhao et
al. (2006,100996)
Species: Rat
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
DEP: SRM 2975
DEPE: SRM 1975
Particle Size: NR
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 35mgfkg bw
Time to Analysis: AG (amino guanidine) group
pre-treated with 100 mg/kg bw.
Single, 1d.
AG group coexposed 30 pre and 3, 6, 9h post
DEP/DEPE
iNOS expression in AMs: Both DEP and DEPE
increased 12 and 6 fold respectively. NO and
peroxynitrite levels increased accordingly. AG had no
effect on iNOS expression but AG attenuated NO for
both DEP and DEPE but peroxynitrite only for DEPE.
DEP induced much higher levels of oxidants than
DEPE. Unlike DEPE, DEP was unaffected by AG.
Role of iNOS in Lung Injury: DEP and DEPE
induced inflammation (PMN), cellular toxicity (LDH)
and lung injury (protein). AG significantly attenuated
the DEPE response but no effect was observed on
the DEP responses.
Cytokines: IL-12 levels were induced by both DEPE
andDEP, with DEPE inducing higher increases than
DEP, and both were significantly attenuated by AG.
DEP and DEPE induced similar increases in IL-10
levels. AG increased DEP effect 3 fold and attenu-
ated DEPE to control.
CYP enzymes: DEP and DEPE induced increases in
CYP1A1 level and activity.AG attenuated CYP1A1
activity for both DEP and DEPE. CYP2B1 level and
activity were slightly decreased by DEP and DEPE.
AG had no effect.
Cytosol phase II enzymes: DEPE had no effect; AG
treatment increased catalase activity. DEP reduced
catalase and GST activities. AG had no effect.
Neither DEP, DEPE nor AG affected QR quinone
reductase.
July 2009
D-124
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Zhou et UFe: Ultrafine Fe particles
al. (2003, 087940) Partic|e Size: 72nm
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Age: 10-12wks
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 57 or 90//gfm3
Time to Analysis: 6hfd for 3d, parameters
measured within 2h post exposure.
BALF Inflammatory/Injury Markers: At the high
dose, total protein increased. No significant changes
were observed in LDH.
BALF Cells: No significant changes observed in total
cell number, cell viability or cell differentials.
Intracellular ferritin: The high dose induced
increases. No significant differences were observed
between the low dose and control.
Oxidative stress: Antioxidant level by FRAP value
decreased at the high dose. GST (glutathiones-
tranferase) activity increased at the high dose. No
effect on intracellular GSH and GSSG (glutathione
disulfide) was observed.
Cytokines: Only at thehigh dose was an increase in
IL-1 p observed. No effect on TNF-alph or NFkB-DNA
binding activity was observed.
Table D-4. Effects related to immunity and allergy.
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Apicella C et al.
(2006, 096586)
Species: Mouse
Strain: BALB/c
Cell Line: 112D5
hybridoma
Primary
Macrophages:
Peritoneal
Poly OVA (Ovalbumin on polystyrene
beads) Soluble OVA
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration:
PolyOVA and Soluble OVA: 0.2,1.0 or 5.0//gfmL
Time to Analysis: 48 h
IL-6: Stimulation with PolyOVA higher than
stimulation with soluble OVA
TNFa: Stimulation with PolyOVA higher than
stimulation with soluble OVA.
IL-10: No modifications in levels after
PolyOVA or soluble OVA stimulation.
Viability of Peritoneal macrophages:
Stimulation with PolyOVA led to 33%
decrease in viability. Stimulation with soluble
OVA led to 24% in viability.
Effects of PolyOVA stimulated
macrophages: Culture supernatants from
PolyOVA stimulated macrophages had a
percentage increase of asymmetric IgG;
however, the addition of rmlL-6 at identical
concentrations did not induce a significant
increase. It also decreased the proliferation of
112D5 hybridoma.
Reference:
Arantes-Costa et
al. (2008,
187137)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: BALB/c
Age: 6wks
Weight: NR
ROFA (solid waste incinerator powered
by combustible oil; Sao Paulo, Brazil)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Intranasal^ Instilled
Dose/Concentration: 60 fjg ROFA in 50 fjL
saline
Time to Analysis: OVA sensitized days 1 and
14. OVA-challenged days 22, 24, 26, and 28.
ROFA exposed 1-3h after OVA challenge or
saline. Pulmonary responsiveness measured day
30 then sacrificed. Lungs removed, fixed for 48h.
ROFA increased pulmonary responsiveness
and decreased ciliated cells in nonsensitized
mice, which were both further amplified in the
presence of OVA. ROFA did not affect
eosinophils, macrophages, chronic
inflammation, or neutral or acidic mucus.
July 2009
0-125
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Araujo et al.
(2008,156222)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: ApoE
C57BL/CJ
Age: 6wks
Weight: NR
CAPs (Los Angeles, California freeway;
Nov-Dec 2005)
Particle Size: Fine particles (FP):
< 2.5 /jm; UFP: <0.18 /jm
Route: Whole-body Exposure
Dose/Concentration: FP: ~440/yg/m3, UFP:
— 110 /jm; PM number concentration: FP: 4.56
X 106 particles/cm3, UFP: 5.59 X106
particles/cm3
Time to Analysis: Exposed 5hfd, 3dfwk for total
of 75h. Killed 24 to 48h postexposure.
Composition: UFP had a higher particle
number, surface area, PAH content and
fractional carbon composition than FP.
Atherosclerosis: UFP had significantly
greater aortic atherosclerotic lesions than FP
and the control. The lesions were comprised
of macrophage infiltration with intracellular
lipid accumulation. Plaques were thicker and
more extensive in the UFP group.
HDL: FP had increased plasma total
cholesterol. Plasma HDL from both groups had
decreased protective effects. The anti-
inflammatory effect was lower in the UFP
group.
Oxidative Stress: Lipid peroxidation
increased in the FP group. The UFP group had
increases in hepatic malondialdehyde, Nef2,
catalase, glutathione S-transferase Ya,
NAD(P-quinone oxidoreductase and superoxide
dismutase 2.
Reference:
Archer et al.
(2004, 088097)
Species: Mouse
Strain: BALB/c
D011.10+/ +
transgenic - ova
specific receptor
for OVA peptide
323-339
Age: 4 wks
PM - SRM 1648 (NIST)
Titanium dioxide (Ti02) as a control
particle
Particle Size:
SRM1648: avg 1.4 ym
Ti02: avg 0.3 /yg (sic)
Route: Intranasal instillation
Dose/Concentration: 500/yg PM/30//I sterile
saline (ultrasonic suspension) initial 0-750/yg
range finding
Time to Analysis: Ova challenge at 68h, Meth-
acholine aerosolization/AR at 72h
Airway responsiveness (WBP): AR induced
by OvafMch challenge was significantly and
dose-dependently increased at doses of
SRM1648 £500ug . Ti02/0va exposure was
not significantly different from saline. PM
associated endotoxin did not contribute to en-
hanced AR.
Lung inflammation/pathology: No increases
in BAL macrophages or eosinophils and no
histological alterations after PM exposure.
Both Ti02 and PM increased pulmonary neu-
trophils, indicating particles alone were
responsible for this increase and that the
inflammatory response could occur
independently of AR.
Reference:
Barrett et al.
(2006,155677)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: BALB/c
Age: 8-10wks
n: Groups of 15-
16 incl. controls
HWS (black/white oak)
CO
Total Vapor Hydrocarbon (TVH)
Particle Size: 0.25 ± 3.3, 0.35 :
2.5, 0.35 ± 2.0, 0.36 ± 2.1 /m
(MMAD±GSD)
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: HWS: 30,100 300,
1000/yg/m3
CO: 0.7,1.6, 4.0,13ppm
TVH: 0.3, 0.6,1.3, 3.1ppm
Time to Analysis: Pretreatment: i|) 10 //g OVA
and 2mg aluminum hydroxide
post-OVA. OVA aerosol challenge on day 14,
followed by 3d of HWS.
Pre-OVA received aerosol OVA challenge on day
14, then 3d of HWS on days 26-28 and an
immediate (second) OVA challengeHWS 6 h/d for
3d. Sacrificed 18h post-exposure.
Allergic Inflammation: A statistically
significant increase in eosinophils was
observed at 300 /yglm3 HWS following OVA
challenge as compared to OVA alone. No
changes in macrophages, neurophils and
lymphocytes were observed. Post-OVA HWS
did not significantly alter BAL cytokine or
serum antibody levels, but linear trend
analyses indicated decreases in IL-2, IL-4, and
IFNn in the absence of OVA, as well as a
statistically significant upward trend in OVA-
specific IgE when HWS exposure followed
OVA challenge. HWS exposure pre-OVA (prior
to second OVA challenge) resulted in a
decrease in IL-13 (statistically significant at
the high dose but no evidence of an exposure-
dependent response), an increase in OVA lgG1
(trend significant) and no change in IL-2, IL-4,
IL-5, IFNn, OVA IgE, total IgE or OVA lgG2a.
Reference:
Burchiel et al.
(2005, 088090)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: A/J
Age: 12-14wks
HWS (black/white oak)
HWS particle Mass
BC
Organic Carbon (OC)
CO
Total Vapor Hydrocarbon
29 other minor components PAH and
metals
Particle Size: 0.3±3, 0.4 ±2, 0.4±2,
0.4 ±2fjm (MMAD±GSD)
Route: Inhalation Chambers
Dose/Concentration: HWS: 30,100, 300,
1000/yg/m3
BC: 3,12, 25, 43//gfm3
0C:40,107, 281, 908//g/m3
CO: 1, 2, 4,13 ppm
TVH: ND, 1,1,3 ppm
Time to Analysis: 6 h/d for 6m
Proliferative responses: HWS increased
splenic T cell proliferation at 100 /ygfm3 with
a dose dependent decrease at 300 and
1000 /yglm3 exposures (p < 0.05) HWS
exposure did not affect T (CD3), helper T cell
(Th, CD4), cytotoxic T cell (CTL, CD8),
macrophage (Mac-1), natural killer cell (NK,
CD16) cell markers or B cell proliferative
response to LPS.
July 2009
D-126
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Burchiel et al.
(2004, 055557)
Species: Mouse
Strain: AJ
Age: 10-12wks
DE generated alternatively from two
2000 Cummins ISB Turbo Diesel 5.9 L
engines using no 2 (chevron) oil and
15w/40 oil (Rotella T, Shell) run ac-
cording to USEPA Dynamometer
Schedule for Heavy-Duty Diesel
Engines
18 PAHs quantified at exposure levels
(text mentions 65)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Inhalation Chambers
Dose/Concentration: 30,100, 300,1000
mg/m3 diesel PM
Time to Analysis: 6 h/d, 7 dfwk for 6m
Proliferative responses: DE (
splenic T cell proliferation at all exposure
levels but was not dose-dependent and most
pronounced at the 30 //g|m3 level, (p < 0.05
at all levels) Splenic B cell proliferation was
increased at the 30 //gfm3 level, but not at the
other exposure levels. Little, if any, PAH was
found in DE, and the majority of PAH tested in
vitro enhanced T cell proliferation (below), so
PAH is likely not responsible for the
immunosuppressive effect of DE on murine
spleen cell responses.
Reference:
Burchiel et al.
(2004, 055557)
Species: Mouse
Strain: AJ
Age: 10-12
weeks
Cell Type: spleen
cells
Use: In vitro
Benzo(ayrene (BaP)
Benzo[a]pyrene-r-7,t-8-dihydrodiol-t-
9,10 epoxide(±) ((antiPDE)
Benzo[a]pyrenetrans-7,8'dihydrodiol
(±)(BP-7,8-diol)
Benzo[a]pyrene-1,6-dione (1,6-BPQ)
Benzo[a]pyrene-3,6-dione (3,6-BPQ)
Benzo[a]pyrene-6,12-dione (6,12 BPQ)
Particle Size:NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 1x10 6 cellsfmL in
100//I aliquots
0.01, 0.1 and 1 /jm
Time to Analysis: 72h
BaP at the highest concentration was found
to double splenic T cell proliferation. The
BPQs all also increased T cell proliferation at
much lower concentrations but not in a dose
dependent manner.
Splenic B cell was increased by Bp-(7,8)-diol,
and inhibited by BPDE and 3,6 BPQ but only at
the highest level. Authors concluded that due
to low level of PAH in DE and absence of
BPQs these compounds are not responsible for
immunosuppressive effects of DE.
Reference: Chan
(2006,090193)
Species:
Mouse
Strain: D011.10,
BALB/c,/lfr/2-/-
Cell Types:
Primary bone
marrow dendritic
cells and dendritic
cell line (BCD, T
cells (BMDC)
DEP: DE particles
DEP methanol extract:
Particle Size: PM > 50 as
characterized by Singh et al. 2004
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: DEPs 10//gf'niL
LPS 5ng/mL
Time to Analysis: 24h, stored at -20°C until
analyzed
Dendritic cell maturation: Organic DEP
chemicals interfered in the expression of
several DC maturation markers. Both DEP and
DEP extracts were found to inhibit CD86
expression and IL-12 production in LPS-
exposed DCs, and intact particles were not as
effective as DEP extract. DEP extract
treatment of BC1 cells reduced their ability to
stimulate co-cultured antigen-specific T cells,
leading to decreased IFN- y and increased IL-
10 without affecting IL-4 or IL-13. DEP
extract also induced oxidative stress and
interfered with DC activation by several other
Toll-like receptor agonists as well as the NF-
kB cascade. Inhibition of IL-12 production by
DEP extract was shown to be mediated by
pro-oxidative chemicals that engage the Nrf2
pathway. Taken together the inhibition of both
IL-12 and IFN- y indicates a suppression of the
Th1 pathway and provides a novel explanation
for the adjuvant effect of DEPs on allergic
inflammation
July 2009
D-127
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: DE: generated from a 30-kW (40 hp), 4-
Ciencewicki et al. cylinder Deutz BF4M1008 diesel
(2007,096557) engine
Species: Mouse Influeza A/Bangkok/1 /79 (H3N2
Gender: Female p,erotVP?) from Dr Melinda Beck of the
University of North Carolina, Chapel
Strain: BALB/c Hill
Age: 10-12wks O2, CO, NO2, NO, SO2
Weight: 17-20g q2: 20.9. 20.5% (Lo, Hi)
CO: 0.9-5.4 ppm
NO2: 0.25-1.13 ppm
NO: 2.5-10.8 ppm
SO2: 0.06-0.32 ppm
H3N2: NR
Particle Size: NR
Route: Inhalation (oropharyngeal aspiration of
virus)
Dose/Concentration: DE: 529 or 2070/yglm3
Time to Analysis: 4 h/d for 5d. Virus exposure
immediately after last DE exposure. Analyzed 18h
post infection
DE exposure on susceptibility to Influenza
infection: Mice exposed to 0.5 mgfm3 had
significantly greater levels of HA mRNA
compared to air-exposed mice. HA levels not
significantly altered in mice exposed to 2.0
mg/m3.
DE exposure on the Influenza-induced
inflammatory response: f IL-6 mRNA levels
were significantly greater when exposed to
0.5 mg/m3 of DE prior to infection compared
to air exposure. Significantly increased
amount of IL-6 protein observed in exposed
mice. Exposure to DE in absence of influenza
infection had no significant effect on IL-6
mRNA or protein levels.
DE exposure on pulmonary injury: Infection
with the influenza virus increases levels of
PMN in BAL fluid. Exposure to either dose of
DE prior to infection showed no significant
effect on PMN levels Exposure to DE alone
had no effect on PMNs in BAL fluid. Neither
exposure to DE nor infection with influenza
significantly increased BAL fluid protein levels
when compared to non-infected, air-exposed.
Other markers of injury, NAG and MIA were
not statistically affected by DE or influenza
exposure.
DE exposure on the influenza induced
interferon response: No significant change
in TFN-a mRNA levels at either dose of DE,
although mice exposed to 0.5 mgfm3 of DE
prior to infection had significantly greater
levels of IFN-B MRNA compared to air
controls. No effect on any of the IFNs
observed in uninfected mice exposed to DE.
DE exposure on surfactant protein
expression: Influenza virus infection alone
significantly increased expression of SP A in
air-exposed. Exposure to 0.5 mg/m3 of DE
prior to infection had significant decreases in
levels of SP A mRNA in the lungs, this effect
was not observed in 2.0 mgfm3 DE exposed.
Decrease seen in expression of SP A protein in
lungs of mice exposed to 0.5 mg/m3 DE prior
to infection. Levels of SP-D mRNA and protein
were significantly decreased in lungs of mice
exposed to 0.5 mg/m3 of DE prior to infection
compared with mice exposed to air or 2.0
mg/m3 DE prior to infection. Exposure to 0.5
mg/m3 of DE prior to infection with influenza
decreased levels of SP-D, especially in
airways. Mice exposed to 2.0 mg/m3 DE prior
to infection showed no significant difference.
Reference: Day
et al. (2008,
190204)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: BALB/c
Age: 8-10wks
Weight: NR
GEE (General Motors 1996 model 4.3-L
V6 engine; regular unleaded fuel) (CO,
NO, NO?, SO2, NHs)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Whole-body Exposure Chamber
Dose/Concentration: Low(L)- 6.6±3.7 PM/m3,
Medium(M)- 30.3 ±11.8 PM/m3, High(H)-
59.1 ±28.3 PM/m3, High-Filtered(HF)-
Time to Analysis: Pre-OVA protocol: OVA or
saline sensitized 7d. OVA challenge day 14. GEE
or air exposed 6h/d on days 26-28. Immediately
after exposure on day 28 challenged with OVA.
Tested for MCh-induced changes 24h
postexposure then sacrificed. Post-OVA protocol:
OVA or saline sensitized 7d. OVA challenge day
14. GEE or air exposed days 15-17. Tested for
MCh-induced changes 24h postexposure then
sacrificed.
Post-OVA: In nonsensitized mice, neutrophils
dose-dependently decreased, IL-4 decreased in
the M group, IL-5 decreased in the HF group,
and IFN-n decreased at all exposures. In OVA-
sensitized mice, IL-13 dose-dependently
decreased.
Pre-OVA: In nonsensitized mice, neutrophils
and IgE decreased in the H group. IL-2
increased in the HF group and was dose-
dependent. Eosinophils dose-dependently
decreased. OVA-specific IgE increased in the H
group, and OVA-specific lgG2adose-
dependently increased. In OVA-sensitized
mice, OVA-specific IgGi increased in the M
group. Airway hyperresponsiveness was lower
in the M and HF groups.
July 2009
D-128
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: de
Haaret al. (2005,
097872)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain:
BALB/cANNCrl
Age: 6-8wks
Weight: NR
CBP: Carbon black particles in
phosphate buffered saline, 1: 10 & 1:
100 dilutions (Brunschwich Chemicals,
Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
OVA: Ovalbumin (igma-Aldrich,
Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands)
Particle Size: CBP: 30-50nm
Route: Intranasal Droplet
Dose/Concentration: CBP± OVA 200, 20, 2/yg
(3.3, 0.33, 0.033 mg/ml)
OVA only: 20 /yg (0.5 mg/ml)
Time to Analysis: Droplet applied on days 0,1,
2. Sacrificed on day 4 or challenged with OVA
droplet on days 25, 26, & 27. Sacrificed on day
28
Acute airway damage and inflammation:
Only day 4 had LDH increased in the 200 /yg
CBP+OVA group. The 200//g CBP + OVA
group induced significantly higher numbers of
BAL cells compared to OVA control. Total
protein and TNF-a levels were increased only
in 200/yg CBP+OVA group. RAS, parameter
for phagocytosis, 200 /yg and 20 /yg
CBP+OVA had higher levels than OVA
controls.
Adjuvant activity on PBLN: Total
lymphocytes in PBLN significantly increased
4-5 fold in the 200 /yg CBP+OVA exposed. 20
/yg and 2 /yg exposures did not increase the
number of PBLN cells compared to OVA
control. All CBP+OVA concentrations induced
higher levels of IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, and IL-13,
with 200 /yg concentration having 10-200
times higher levels. IFN-y cytokine was
increased in the 200 /yg dose.
IgE Production: In CBP+OVA, IgE were
significantly increased.
PBLN and Lung Lymphocytes after OVA
challenge: PBLN cell numbers increased in
OVA and CBP+OVA sensitized mice. CD4 and
CD8 populations increased in both groups.
PBLN levels in CBP+OVA and challenged with
PBS were higher than mice treated with OVA
and challenged with PBS, both groups
cytokine production was low, only IL-5 levels
were significant in the CBP+OVA/PBS group.
Higher lung lymphocyte numbers were caused
by higher numbers of CD4 and CD19.
Production of IL-5 and IL-10 was four to five
times higher than in OVA treated mice.
OVA challenge induces asthma like airway
inflammation in CBP+OVA sensitized
mice: Total number of cells in BAL increased
10 fold in CBP+OVA mice challenged with
OVA. Eosinophils exhibited highest increase in
CBP+ OVA/OVA group. Perivascular and
peribronchial infiltrates and globlet cell
hyperplasia in CBP+OVA/OVA was confirmed
by histological examination. Antigen specific
inflammation induced in CBP+OVA mice.
July 2009
D-129
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: de
Haar (2006,
144746)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain:
BALB/cANNCr
Age: 6-8wks
Weight: NR
CBP: fine (F) and ultrafine (UF) carbon
black particles (Ken Donaldson Group)
Ti02: fine and ultrafine titanium oxide
particles (Ken Donaldson Group)
OVA: Ovalbumin (Sigma-Aldrich,
Zwijndrecht, the Netherlands)
Particle Size: F CBP: 260.Onm
UF CBP: 14.0nm
F Ti02: 250.0nm
UFTKk 29.Onm
Route: Intranasal Droplet
Dose/Concentration: CBP: 200/yg (3.3 mgfmL)
Ti02: 200/yg (3.3 mg/mL)
OVA: 10 //g
CBP+OVA: 200 +10//g (see note in 3008)
Time to Analysis: Days 0,1,2: Exposed to OVA
or CBP+OVA. Sacrificed on day 8 & analyzed
after 2h, or continued to second group.
Second group: days 25, 26, 27 given OVA
challenge day 28: sacrificed , analyzed 24h post
sacrifice
Ultrafine particles induce lung
inflammation: UF Ti02 and CBP induced a
local inflammatory response in the airways
and showed higher levels of LDH and total
protein as compared to mice exposed to the F
particles. Cytokine levels were much higher in
groups exposed to ultrafine particles.
Histologic analysis of the airways showed
that exposure to ultrafine Ti02 or CBP leads to
peribronchial and perivascular inflammatory
infiltrates (mostly neutrophils). Exposure to
OVA alone, or combined with fine Ti02 and
fine CBP had no effects on lung histology.
Ultrafine stimulate local immune
responses: Ti02 and CBP particles stimulated
the local immune response against co
administered OVA antigen. Fine Ti02 particles
induced a low but significant increase in PBLN
cell number. Both types of ultrafine particles
elicited higher levels of Th-2 associated
cytokines, with UF CBP stimulating a greater
response. IFNy production was low, but
significantly higher than OVA exposures.
Ultrafine Ti02 increase ovalbumin-specific
IgE and IgG 1 levels: Levels of OVA specific
IgE were significantly increased in animals
exposed to the UF Ti02+ OVA compared to F
Tith or OVA-only.. Average IgE level in mice
exposed to ultrafine CBP+OVA was not a
significant increase. OVA-specific lgG2a not
detected in any groups. Ultrafine particles
stimulate allergic airway sensitization
against ovalbumin: At day 28, the PBLN cell
numbers were significantly higher in both
ultrafine and combination with OVA.
Production of OVA specific IL-4, IL-5, IL-10
and IL-13 by PBLN cells was significantly
increased in both ultrafine Ti02 and CBP. IFNy
levels were significantly increased in ultrafine
CBP+OVA treated animals. F Ti02 had low,
but significant, increases in IL-4 and IFNy
compared to OVA only. Allergic airway
inflammation and Influxes of eosinophils,
neutrophils and lymphocytes were only found
in both groups exposed to ultrafine particles.
Reference: de
Haar (2008,
187128)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: BALB/c,
CD80/CD86-
deficient,
~011.10
Age: 6-8wks
Weight: NR
Ultrafine Carbon Black (UFCB)
(Brunschwich Chemicals; Amsterdam,
The Netherlands)
Particle Size: Diameter: 30-50nm
Route: Intranasal Exposure. IP Injection. Tail
Injected.
Dose/Concentration: 20//gfmL
Time to Analysis: Exposed days 1, 2, 3. Kept in
supine position until recovery. OVA challenge
days 25, 26, 27. Spleens and lymph nodes from
D011.10 mice pooled and CD4+ T-cells isolated.
Solution injected into tail veins of BALB/c mice
day 0. CTLA4-lg ip injected days 0, 2. PBLN cell
suspensions plated, restimulated with OVA 4d.
UFCB+OVA induced proliferation of CD4+T-
cells, increased cytokine production.
UFCB+OVA did not induce any effects in
CD80/CD86-deficient mice. UFCB-induced
airway inflammation is dose-dependent.
Reference: de
Haaret al. (2008,
187128)
Species: Mouse
Cell Line: Myeloid
dendritic cells
(mDCs)
Ultrafine Carbon Black (UFCB)
(Brunschwich Chemicals; Amsterdam,
The Netherlands)
Particle Size: Diameter: 30-50nm
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 25//gfmL
Time to Analysis: mDCs cultured from bone
marrow. Exposed 18h. Cells isolated, stained for
flow cytometry.
UFCB+OVA increased mDCs in the
peribronchial lymph nodes, and their
expressions of CD80, CD86, and MHC-11.
July 2009
D-130
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Dong
et al. (2005,
088079)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Brown-
Norway
(BNfCrlBR)
Age: NR
Weight: 200-
225g
DEP: SRM 2975 (NIST, Gaithersburg,
MD)
OVA: Ovalbumin (Sigma ,St Louis, MO)
Particle Size: 0.5 /jm (MMAD)
Route: Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: DEP: 20.6 ± 2.7 mg/m3
OVA 40.5 ± 6.3mg/m3
Time to Analysis: 4 h/d for 5 days + OVA 30
min/d 1 x wk on days 8,15 & 29. Sacrificed on
days 9 or 30.
Lung Inflammation/Injury: Both the BAL
proteins and inflammatory cell counts for DEP
exposure alone were not different from those
of the air exposed control, suggesting that
DEP exposure did not cause lung injury at 9 or
30 days post-exposure. OVA exposure caused
significant increases in neutrophils,
lymphocytes, eosinophils, albumin and LDH
activity in the lung after two exposures. DEP
did show a strong effect on OVA-induced
inflammatory responses.
Alveolar Macrophage (AM) function: OVA
exposure resulted in an increase in NO levels
in the acellular BAL fluid and AM conditioned
media. This increase was significantly
attenuated in rats exposed to DEP. DEP
exposure had no significant effect on the
production of IL-10 or IL-12 by AM recovered
from rats 9 and 30 days post exposure. In
contrast, OVA sensitization elevated both IL-
10 and IL-12 secretion by AM at both time
points.
Lymphocyte population and cytokine
production: DEP exposure was found to
increase the numbers of total lymphocytes, T
cells and their CD4+ and CD8+ subsets in
LDLN. OVA exposure also significantly
increased these cell counts on days 9 and 30.
DEP+OVA exposure showed a significant
reduction in total lymphocytes, T cells, CD4 +
and CD8+ subsets on day 30. Levels of IL-4
and IFN-y in lymphocyte conditioned media
were below detection limit of the ELISA kits.
Intracellular GSH levels in AM and
Lymphocytes: DEP exposure alone slightly
decrease GSH levels in AM, but markedly
reduced GSH concentration in lymphocytes on
days 9 and 30. OVA exposure significantly
decreased intracellular GSH in both cell types.
Combined exposure showed AM and
lymphocytes to have depleted intracellular
GSH.
OVA specific IgE and IgG levels in serum:
In all samples collected on day 9, both serum
IgG and IgE levels were under the detection
limits. On day 30, no measureable IgE levels
were found. The OVA exposure, however,
resulted in elevated IgE levels, and was
enhanced in rats preexposed to DEP. IgE and
IgG levels for DEP+OVA was twO times
higher than OVA alone indicating that DEP has
an adjuvant effect on the production of IgG
and IgE.
Effects of DEP and OVA on Lung iNOS
expression: AM from various exposure
groups did not stain for iNOS. 1 rat at day 9
from the combined DEP+OVA group showed a
slightly positive iNOS staining. On day 30, 2
of 5 rats from combined exposure group and 1
from the OVA group showed a positive airway
staining.
July 2009
D-131
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Dong
et al. (2005,
088083)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Brown-
Norway
(BNfCrlBR)
Age: NR
Weight: 200-
225g
DEP: SRM 2975 Diesel Exhaust
Particles (NIST)
OVA: Ovalbumin (Sigma Chemical
Company, St Louis, MO)
Particle Size: 0.5/ym (MMAD)
Route: Nose-only Directed Flow Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: DEP 22.7 ± 2.5 mg/m3
OVA 42.3 ± 5.7mg/m3
Time to Analysis: Day 1, 8,15: OVA exposure
30min/day
Days 24-28: DEP exposure 4h/day
Day 29: OVA challenge
Day 30: Whole-body plethysmography
Day 31: Sacrifice
Effect of DEP on OVA induced allergic
responses: DEP exposure had a synergistic
effect with OVA on inducing airway hyper-
responsiveness (AHR) in rats. DEP alone had
no effect on IgG production. Levels of OVA-
specific IgG and IgE increased in OVA+DEP
exposure. This indicates that DEP pre-
exposure augments the immune response of
rats to OVA in the production of allergen
specific IgG and IgE.
Effect of DEP on OVA induced cell
differentiation: Neither DEP, OVA nor the
combination induced elevated levels of LDH
activity or albumin content, indicating that the
exposure protocols did not cause significant
lung injury. DEP alone induced moderate but
significant increase of neutrophil numbers.
OVA exposure induced a greater infiltration of
neutrophils than DEP, and infiltration of
eosinophils and lymphocytes. OVA-induced
eosinophil count markedly increased with DEP
exposure. Total lymphocytes, T cells, and their
CD4+ and CD8+ subsets in LDLN from rats
sensitized and challenged by OVA were
significantly higher than those of air-exposed
non sensitized rats. DEP+OVA exposure
resulted in substantial increase in T cells
compared to OVA alone.
Effect of DEP on OVA-induced oxidant
generation and GSH depletion: Exposure to
DEP or OVA alone had no effect on ROS
production by AM. Substantial elevation seen
in ROS for the DEP + OVA exposed group. Both
OVA and DEP exposures resulted in an
increased presence of NO in the acellular BAL
fluid and in AM conditioned media; OVA +DEP
exposure further increased these levels. The
ATII cells from OVA exposed rats exhibited a
higher percentage of cells that produce NO
and superoxide than air exposed, non
sensitized rats. DEP and OVA exposure
resulted in a significant increase in the
percentage of cells that produce NO and
superoxide over the control.
il\IOS expression: Immunohistological
analysis in lung tissues showed no AM
staining in any group. Airway epithelium was
found to be positive in all 5 rats from the
DEP+OVA group and 3 of 5 rats from single
exposure of DEP or OVA and 2 of 5 in air only
exposed rats. iNOS expression was
significantly higher in ATII cells isolated from
rats exposed to combined DEP and OVA .
GSH levels in AM and lymphocytes: Levels
were slightly lowered by DEP or OVA
exposure, though not statistically significant.
DEP+OVA showed a significant reduction in
GSH levels.
July 2009
D-132
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Drela
et al. (2006,
096352)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: BALB/c
Age: 6 wks
Weight: NR
ASM: Air suspended PM from Upper
Silesia (Poland)
1/yg of ASM:
Pb (1.136 ng)
Cu (0.004//g)
Co (0.072 ng)
Mn (0.406 ng)
Fe (0.016 //g)
Cd (0.154 ng)
Cr (0.418 ng)
Ni (0.238 ng)
Particle Size: 0.3-10/ym
Route: Intraperitoneal Injection
Dose/Concentration: 170mg ASM/kg of body
weight
Time to Analysis: One time exposure, sacrificed
72h post exposure
CD28 expression on thymocytes at
different stages of development: ASM
exposure accelerated thymocyte maturation
but did not alter the expression of CD28 on
peripheral CD4 and CD8 T cells isolated from
lymph nodes. A slight but not statistically
significant decrease in the expression of CD28
on spleen T cells from ASM animals was
observed.
Distribution of CD28(low) and CD28(high):
Acute exposure to ASM resulted in the
increase of CD28(low) and decrease of CD28
(high) thymocyte percentages in the total
thymocyte population. The percentages of
CD28 low and high thymocytes did not differ
between intact and PBS controls. Acute ASM
exposure resulted in the increase of the
percentage of CD28(low) and the decrease of
CD28(high) thymocytes in the CD3 low
subset. The percentage of CD28 low and high
positive thymocytes did not differ in CD3 high
thymocyte subset. Natural regulatory CD4+
CD25+ T cells in the thymus: The
development of thymic natural regulatory cells
was unaffected by ASM.
Proliferation of splenocytes and lymph
node lymphocytes: Decreased proliferative
responses were evident in splenocytes from
ASM-exposed animals when cells were
stimulated with low but not high levels of anti-
CD3 mAb.ln contrast, lymph node
lymphocytes from ASM treated mice had
increased proliferative responses independent
of anti-CD3 concentration. Both CD4+ and
CD8+ T cells from ASM treated mice
proliferated more vigorously than from
controls. Almost all CD8+ T cells from ASM
mice were induced to proliferate.
Reference:
Dybing et al.
(2004, 097545)
Species: Mouse
Gender: NR
Strain: BALB/cA
Age: NR
Weight: NR
Assay: PLN,
ELISA
UP: Urban ambient particles collected
in 5 different sites (Amsterdam, Lodz,
Oslo, Rome, Dutch seaside) during four-
week periods in spring, summer, winter
seasons from March 2001 to March
2004.
DEP as reference std: SRM 1650
(NIST)
OVA: Ovalbumin (Sigma Chemical, St.
Louis, MO)
Particle Size: UP: PMioand PM2.6
Route: Injection in hind foot pad
Dose/Concentration: UP: 100/yg- 200/yg
DEP: 50 //g
OVA: 50 //g
Time to Analysis: PLN assay:
Day 0: 1 exposure to OVA alone, OVA
w/particles, particles alone.
Day 6: Lymph nodes harvested
Day 21: 1 OVA w/o particles exposure
Day 26: Antibody assay
Allergy screening: All samples were
immunostimulatory in the popliteal lymph node
assay; activity was weak in the absence of
OVA but statistically significant when injected
with OVA, indicating an adjuvant effect.
Particle adjuvancy was further demonstrated
via significant enhancement of OVA-specific
antibody responses. All ambient particle
fractions from all seasons increased lgG1.
Except for a few coarse samples, all fractions
significantly increased IgE. All fine fractions
and some coarse fractions significantly
increased lgG2a, indicating that most particles
could exert both Th1 and Th2 adjuvancy. In
general, fine particles demonstrated stronger
adjuvant activity than coarse in a pair-wise
comparison of coarse and fine particles from
the same location.
Reference:
Dybing, et al.
(2004, 097545)
Species Rat
Cell Lines:
Primary rat type 2
cells, rat alveolar
macrophages
Use:
Inflammatory
screening
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 0-50//gfml
UP: Urban ambient particles collected
in 5 different sites (Amsterdam, Lodz,
Oslo, Rome, Dutch seaside) during four
week periods in spring, summer, winter Time to Analysis: 20h
seasons from March 2001 to March
2004.
DEP: SRM 2975 (NIST)
OVA: Ovalbumin (Sigma Chemical, St.
Louis, MO)
Particle Size: PM10 and PM2.6
Inflammation screening: The coarse
fractions were more potent than the fine
fractions. Among the samples, the overall
effects of the coarse fractions on the cells
were dependent on the site of collection. High
MIP-2 levels were found using particles from
some spring collections. Coarse particles
collected in summer demonstrated the highest
potency, and samples collected during winter
proved to be less potent but seasonal variation
was not obvious for all sites. Only minor
responses were observed using fine fractions
from urban sites.
July 2009
D-133
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Farraj
et al. (2006,
141730)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: BALB/c
Age: 6 weeks
Weight: NR
DEP: SRM 2975 NIST
OVA: Ovalbumin
Anti-p75: Rabbit anti-mouse p75
neruotrophin receptor polyclonal
antibody (Ohemicon, Temecula, OA)
Anti-trkA: anti-mouse trkA NGF
receptor antibody (Santa Oruz, Santa
Cruz, OA)
Particle Size: DEP: 1.47//m (MMAD),
2.75 GSD
Route: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: DEP: 1.78 to 2.18 mgfm3
Anti-p75: 50 /j\
Anti-trkA: 50 /j\
OVA injection: 20/yg
MCH: 0,16, 32, 64 mg/ml
Time to Analysis: On day 0: ip injection of 20
/yg OVA
Day 14: intranasal instilation of 50 ul anti-p75 or
anti-trkA
Day 14,1-h after 1st exposure: challenged with
OVA aerosol for 1h followed by a h exposure to
DEP
24 h after DEP exposure: MCH challenge
Airways responsiveness: No significant
differences in avg baseline Penh values of any
treatment groups.
Vehicle sensitized mice: exposure to DEP, anti-
p75 or anti-trkA had no effect on MCH-
induced Penh values.
OVA-sensitized DEP-exposed: seen increase of
Penh values. Administration of anti-p75 or
anti-trkA to OVA sensitized mice reversed DEP
induced Penh increases.
Lung function in ventilated mice: Compared
to vehicle sensitized mice, central airway
resistance (Rn) increased 62% in OVA
sensitized mice was not a significant increase.
OVA-sensitized DEP-exposed mice, anti-p75
decreased central airway resistance (Rn) and
anti-trkA did not significantly alter Rn. though
Rn response for anti-p75 was significantly less
than anti-trkA response, Constant phase
model parameter of tissue elastance not
significantly affected by any treatments or by
increasing MCH dose, indicating development
of significant regional ventilation
inhomogeneity during bronchoconstriction.
Airway pathology: OVA-sensitized mice had
small increases in intraepithelial mucus
compared to vehicle-sensitized mice. DEP
exposure did not enhance severity of OVA-
induced airway pathology. Anti-p75 or anti-
trkA administration did not influence airway
morphology.
BAL cells: Vehicle-sensitized DEP-exposed
mice had significantly enhanced macrophage
numbers by 92% compared to air-exposed,
vehicle-sensitized mice. Anti-p75 or Anti-trkA
administration significantly suppressed DEP-
induced macrophage increase to levels similar
to air-exposed, vehicle-sensitized group. DEP
co exposure significantly decreased number of
macrophages in OVA-sensitized mice to control
levels. Anti-trkA or anti-p75 had no effect in
OVA-sensitized, DEP-exposed. Eosinophil
number greater in OVA-sensitized DEP-exposed
mice than in vehicle-sensitized air-exposed
mice. No significant effects of DEP exposure
on neutrophils from vehicle- or OVA-sensitized
mice.
Cytokines: IL4: OVA-sensitized DEP-exposed
had five-fold increase over vehicle-sensitized,
air-exposed mice and anti-trkA or anti-p75
significantly inhibited the DEP-induced
increase.
IL5, IL13: OVA-sensitized DEP-exposed had no
significant change. Anti-p75 or anti-trkA
administration had no significant effect.
Serum IgE: OVA sensitized mice had a 10 fold
increase in IgE levels for air and DEP exposed
mice. Anti-p75, anti-trkA treatment did not
cause significant effects on IgE levels.
July 2009
D-134
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Farraj
et al. (2006,
189604)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strains: C57/BI6
Aqe: 6wks
DEP: SRM 2975 collected from diesel-
powered industrial forklift filter (NIST)
OVA: Ovalbumin
Anti-p75: Rabbit anti-mouse p75
neurotrophin receptor polyclonal
antibody
Particle Size: 1.47 (MMAD), 2.75
(GSD)
Route: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: DEP: 0.87 mgfm3
MCH: 0,16, 32, 64mg|ml
OVA: 20 /yg ip
Anti-p75: 50 /j\
Time to Analysis: Day 0: OVA in gel vehicle, ip
Day 14: anti-p75 exposure, intranasal instillation
1 h post anti-p75 exposure, OVA aerosol challenge
forih
1h post OVA challenge: DEP exposure for5h
48h post DEP exposure: MOH challenge
Airway responsiveness: No significant
differences in average Penh values among any
vehicle control groups. No significant
differences in treatment groups in OVA-
sensitized mice at baseline 0,16, or 32 mgfmL
of MCH. At 64 mg/mL MCH, OVA-sensitized,
DEP-exposed mice had a 22% increase in Penh
compared to vehicle mice, and a 68% increase
compared to vehicle-sensitized, air-exposed
mice. Instillation of anti-p75 inhibited the DEP
induced increased Penh.
BAL cells: DEP exposure in vehicle-sensitized
mice significantly increased macrophages by
161% compared to air-exposed, vehicle-
sensitized mice, while OVA-sensitized mice
had 69% increase. Anti-p75 administration
significantly suppressed DEP-induced
macrophage increase in vehicle-sensitized
mice. No significant effects of DEP exposure
or anti-p75 treatment in OVA-allergic mice.
OVA-sensitized air-exposed mice had a several
hundred fold increase in the number of
eosinophils. No significant effects of DEP
exposure or anti-p75 treatment on eosinophils
from OVA-sensitized mice. OVA-exposure or
DEP-exposure had no significant effects on
neutrophil or lymphocyte number.
BAL cytokines: No significant effects of DEP
alone or with OVA on IL-4, IL-5, or IL-13.
Serum IgE: OVA sensitization in the presence
or absence of DEP or anti-p75 caused at least
a 3 fold increase in IgE levels. No significant
effects of DEP or anti-p75 treatment on IgE
levels.
Reference:
Finkelman et al.
(2004, 096572)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strains: BALB/c
and C57BL/6
Aqe: 2-4 m
DEP: 4JB1 type: Isuzu Automobile,
Tokyo, Japan
Particle Size: 2 //m MMAD
Route: Two groups: Groupl: 1 ip injection of 2
mg of DEP.
Group 2: daily ip injections of 2mg of DEP
Dose/Concentration: 2 mg
Time to Analysis: 2-96h
Serum Cytokines: Mice in group 1
demonstrated an increase in serum IL-6
production but no increase in IL-4 or IL-2
production. IFN-n levels were decreased in
group 2. TNF production was not affected.
Spleen Cytokines: When injected before LPS,
DEP had little effect on the LPS-induced TNF-
a and IL-6 response, but resulted in a minor
suppression of INF-n and IL-10. DEP LPS-
induced increase in INF-n mRNA responses in
spleen cells. DEP caused a dose related
suppression of LPS stimulated INF-n. DEP had
little or no effect on the percentage of NK or
NKT cells in the spleenand inhibited LPS-
induced IFN-n production by NK and NKT. DEP
failed to inhibit the IFN-n response by anti-
CD3 mAb-activated NKT cells. Oxidant
activity was not responsible for DEP inhibition
of LPS-induced IFN-n production.
Reference:
Fujimaki and
Kurokawa (2004,
189576)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strains: BALB/c
Age: 4 wks
Cell Types:
Cervical lymph-
node (CLN) cells
DE±particles: Comparison of exposure
to DE including particles andexposure
to particle-filtered DE
All mice were injected with sugi basic
protein (SBP), a cedar pollen allergen
before exposure to DE
Particle Size: 0.4 /jm MMAD
Route: Whole-body Exposure
Dose/Concentration: Exposure to: 0,1.0 mgfm3
or 1 .Omg/m3 DE gas only (0.04 mg/m3 PM)
Time to Analysis: Exposure for 12h daily for
5wks. Days 14 and 35 challenge with SBP
intranasaly. Evaluation is 24 and 48h after final
SBP injection.
CLN response: Exposure to DE or DE gas did
not affect B1 lymphocyte subpopulations of
CLN. Culture supernatants of CLN cells from
DE exposedfSBP immunized mice showed
significant increase in MCP-1 at 24 and 48 h.
Exposure to DE or DE gas significantly
increased the amount of TARC and MIP-1a in
CLN cells from SBP-immunized mice at 48 h.
Composition of DE and DE gas: DE: 12.09
± 0.15 NOx, 1 99±0.02 NO2,10.02±0.12
NO, 0.18±0.002S02 and 1769.2±13.2 CO?
(all in ppm). DE gas: 11.93 ± 0.13 NOx,
2.93±0.06N02, 8.91 ±0.09 NO,
0.11 ±0.003S02 and 1838.8±15.3 CO? (all in
ppm)
July 2009
D-135
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Fujimaki et al.
(2005,156456)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strains: C57BL/6
Age: 4 wks
Cell Types
CLN (lymph node)
and Plasma cells
DE generated by 4 cyl 2.74 I Isuzu
diesel
DE gas - DE filtered to remove
particles
Composition of Disel Exhaust: DE
DEP: 1.01 mg/m3
1796ppm CO2
12.09ppm NOx
0.18 ppm SO2
Composition of filtered DE Gas: DEP:
0.04 mg/m3
1839ppm CO2
11.93ppm NOx
0.11 ppm SO2
Sugi Basic Protein (SBP)- allergen
Particle Size Average diameter of
DEP 0.4/ym
Route: Whole-body Exposure Chamber
Dose/Concentration: 1.0mg DEPfm3 or 1.0mg
DEP/m3 DE gas
Time to Analysis: Exposure for 12h daily for
5wks. All mice were injected IP with 100 fjg
SBP before exposure to gas or DE and again
received 50 /yg SBP intranasal^ on days 14 and
35. Evaluation is 1d after final SBP-immunization
(mice are euthanized and CLN and blood samples
are collected)
CLN: Exposure to DE and gas led to a
decrease in total number of CLN cells and
percentage of CD4+ and TCR-B levelsCell
proliferation response to SBP was higher in
gas-exposed mice than in the control group.
The production of MCP-1 increased in CLN
cells when stimulated with SBP (in vitro) but
the difference was not significant at 24 and
48h. SBP-stimulated cells in gas-exposed mice
showed greatly enhanced MIP-1a production
at 24 and 48 h. Exposure to gas increased the
amount of TARC in the culture supernatants
of CLN cells.
PLASMA: Exposure to DE or gas significantly
decreased the anti-SBP lgG1 antibody titers
and increased increased the anti-SBP lgG2a
antibody titers in mouse plasma.
Reference:
Fujimoto et al.
(2005, 096556)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
1st day of
pregnancy)
Strains: Sic: IRC
Cell Types
Fetal Cells/ RNA
Spleen Cells
DEP: generated by a 2369-cc diesel
engine operated at 1050 rpm and 80%
load with commercial light oil
Particle Size: 0.4 /jm MMAD
Route: Whole-body Inhalation Chambers
Dose/Concentration: 0.3,1.0 and 3.0 mg
DEP/m3(Groups 1,2,3)
Time to Analysis: Exposure began at 2d
postcoitum and was continued until 13d
postcoitum. Exposure time was 12h daily for
7d/wk. Pregnant females were sacrificed 14d
postcoitum.
mRNA Expression in Placentas: In groups
exposed to DE, the expression of CYP1A1
mRNA decreased to undetectable levels during
placental absorption and INF-n was increased.
Levels of CYP1A1 mRNA in normal placentas
from DE-exposed mice were unchanged.
mRNA levels of inflammatory cytokines IL-2,
IL-5, IL-12a, IL-12B and GM-CSF increased in
placentas of mice exposed to DE.
Reference: Gao
et al. (2004,
087950)
Species: Human
Cell Line: Lung
fibroblasts
infected with
Mycoplasma
fermentans
R0FA: collected near a power plant in
FL burning low sulfur # 6 oil.
(PM from Dusseldorf, volcanic ash for
Mt. St. Helens, PM from Utah used to
compare against R0FA in one
experiment)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: Cells were seeded into 6-
well plates (3-4.5X106 cells/3mL/well) or 24-well
plates (0.6-1 X106 cells/1.0 mL/well)
3,10, 20, 40, 50 jug/ml
Time to Analysis: 24,48h
Cytokines: R0FA exposure in combination
with Mycoplasma fermentans infection
synergistically amplifies the induction of IL-6
production in human lung fibroblasts (HLF).
PM from the other souces has little
synergistic effect on IL-6 release. Exposing
HLF cells to,M. fermentans derived
macrophage activating lipopeptide-2 (MALP-2)
and R0FA has the same synergistic effect as
M. fermentans infection and R0FA. MALP-2
and R0FA extract have a similar synergistic
effect that requires more time to appear.
R0FA contains high levels of V, Ni, Fe and Cu.
Exposure of HLF to NiS04alone and NiS04
with MALP-2 produced 10 and 50 fold
increases, respectively, in IL-6 production.
Exposure of HLF to CuS04, V0S04 and
Na3V04, with and without the presence of
MALP-2, did not produce as dramatic results
as seen with Ni. The action of NiS04 and
MALP-2 on IL-6 production was found to be
dose dependent.
July 2009
D-136
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Gavett et al.
(2003,053153)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: BALB/c
Aqe: 7wks
PM2.6 from the German cities of
Hettstedt or Zerbst
PM Composition: samples from
Hettstedt have several-fold higher
levels of zinc, magnesium, lead, copper
and cadmium than samples from
Zerbst.
Particle Size: PM2.6
Route: Oropharyngeal Aspirations
Dose/Concentration: 50-100/yg PM in 50/yL
saline
Time to Analysis: Mice were exposed to one
dose of 100 /yg BAL 18h after exposure.
Sensitization Model: Mice were exposed to 50/yg
PM 2h before being sensitized with 10 fjg OVA,
repeated two days later. On day 14- all mice
were challenged with20 /yg OVA.
Parameters measured on days 2 and 7 after
FINAL exposure to OVA.
Challenge Model: Mice were sensitized IP with
20 /yg OVA or adjuvant only. 14d later mice were
exposed to 100 /yg PM2.6 followed 2h later by 20
/yg OVA. Parameters measured on days 2 and 7
after FINAL exposure to OVA.
BAL Analysis: Hettstedt PM significantly
increased BAL protein and NAG levels. Zerbst
PM did not. Mice exposed to Zerbst had lower
levels of LDH than control groups. Hettstedt
exposed mice had increased levels of IL-1B,
IL-6 and MIP-2 in comparison to control and to
mice exposed to Zerbst PM. PM2.6 at a dose of
100 /yg was not found to be toxic, therefore
used for subsequent studies.
Airway Responsiveness (PenH):: In allergic
mice tested immediately after exposure,
Hettstedt PM increased PenH 190% compared
to baseline, Zerbst increased PenH by 120%
and the Control increased by 44%.:.: Two
days after OVA challenge, no differences in
non-allergic mice from either group. In allergic
mice, Hettstedt PM still caused a significant
response to Mch responsiveness, Zerbst none.
No effects on day seven.
IgE Levels: Serum collected on day 2 showed
antigen-specific IgE was increased by
Hettstedt PM2.6 in both the sensitization and
challenge phases when compared to the
control and exposure to Zerbst. Day 7 serum
indicated no effect.
BAL Cell Counts: In non-allergic mice both
Hettstedt and Zerbst PM increased BAL
neutrophil numbers (3-fold: not statistically
significant) and in allergic mice, only Hettstedt
PM significantly increased neutrophil count.
Eosinophil numbers were increased only in
allergic mice exposed to Hettstedt PM.
Lymphocyte numbers were not different
among groups.
BAL Lung Injury:: At 2 days after both
Hettstedt and Zerbst PM administered in
allergic mice caused significant increases in
protein, LDH and NAG compared to the non-
allergic groups. Both PMs caused an increase
in LDH in allergic mice compared to the
allergic control, but only Hettstedt caused an
increase NAG in allergic mice compared to
control. At 7 days no effect.
BAL Cytokines: Allergic mice had increased
levels of IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13 compared to non-
allergic mice (at 2 days after). IL-5 was
significantly increased by exposure to either
PM in allergic mice compared to non-allergic
mice. Exposure to either PM caused an
increase in TNF-a and IFN-n (by 6-8 fold) in
allergic mice, there was also an increase in
these inflammatory cytokines in the non-
allergic group but was not statistically
significant. No significant effects were
observed in animals that underwent the
sensitization protocol alone for any
measurement or endpoint.
Reference:
Gowdy et al.
(2008, 097226)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: BALB/c
Age: -12-
14wks
Weight: 17-20g
DEP (30kW (40hp) 4-cylinder Deutz
BF4M1008 diesel engine, steady state,
20% full load) (Low dose: 21% O2,
0.4wt ratio OC/EC; High dose: 20.7%
O2, 0.4wt ratio OC/EC) (CO, N0«, SO2)
Particle Size: Diameter: ~240nm
Route: Inhalation Exposure Chamber
Dose/Concentration: Low- 514±3 //gf'nr1, High-
2026 ± 38 /yglm3
Time to Analysis: Exposed 4hfd, 1 or 5d
(consecutive). Necropsied immediately or 18h
postexposure.
Inflammation: Neutrophils and lung injury
dose-dependently increased. ICAM-1 increased
immediately after both exposures and after
18h postexposure in the low dose.
Cytokines: After 1 d exposure, IFN-n and
TNF-a increased immediately at both doses
and the high dose, respectively. Immediately
after 5d exposure TNF-a and IFN-n increased
at both concentrations and IL-6 increased at
the low dose. At 18h postexposure IL-6 and
IFN-n increased at both doses, TNF-a and IL-
13 increased at the low dose, and MIP-2 dose-
dependently increased.
CCSP, Surfactants: CCSP decreased. SP A
and SP-D decreases were only significant
after 5d exposure, 18h postexposure.
July 2009
D-137
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Hamada et al.
(2007,091235)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
(Pregnant close to
partruition)
Strain: BALB/c
Use: Pregnant
mice were
exposed and
offspring were
analyzed
ROFA
Route: Nebulized ROFA lechate
ROFA was obtained from a precipitator Dose/Concentration: 50mgfmL dilution
until of a local power plant.
Composition of ROFA (in/yglmL):
341.2 Ni, 323.4 V, 232.2 Zn, 18.3 Co,
15.8 Mn, 8.4 Ca, 6.7 Cu, 6.1 Sr, 5.0
mg, 0.9 Sb, and 0.6 Cd.
Particle Size: NR
Time to Analysis: Pregnant mice exposed to
nebulized ROFA leachate for 30 min/day at days
14,16 and 18 of pregnancy.
Newborns received a single injection (ip) of
0VA(5 /yg) + alum (1 mgO at day followed by
exposure to: 1. aerosolized OVA days 12,13 and
14 (2-week old protocol)
OR
2. aerosolized OVA days 32, 33 and 34 (5wk old
protocol)
Analysis 48h after final allergen exposure
Susceptibility to Asthma:.Exposure of
motherto PBS aerosols during pregnancy did
not result in prominent asthma features in
young. The offspring of the ROFA mothers
revealed increasing AHRand elevated numbers
of eosinophils in the BAL fluid. Similar results
were seen in both the 2-week and 5-week old
groups.
IgE Levels: Histopathology revealed
prominent inflammation in the lungs of the
ROFA neonates and increased allergen-specific
IgE and lgG1 levels in the 5-week group.
Maternal Influence: Breast milk was not
shown to be responsible for the increased
susceptibility to allergy seen in offspring.
IL-4 and IFN-D: IL-4 and IFN-n levels in
maternal mice showed no difference between
PBS exposed or ROFA exposed mice. Cultured
spleen cells from mice born of ROFA-exposed
mothers showed either increased or similar
levels of IL-4 and decreased production of IFN-
~ causing an increase in the ratio of IL-4/IFI\l-n
indicating greater susceptibility to develop
Th2- allergic response.
Eosinophils: Exposure of mothers to Ni levels
similar to those found in ROFA had no
appreciable effect on BAL eosinophil.
Reference: Hao
et al. (2003,
096565)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: BALB/c
Age: 6-7 weeks
DEP
DEP collected from a 4-cylinder diesel
engine under a 10-torque load.
Particle Size: NR
Route: Nebulization
Dose/Concentration: 2 mgfm3 DEP
Time to Analysis: Mild Sensitization- Mice
receive IP OVA alum and are challenge with
aerosolized OVA with and without DEPs. Mice
sacrificed d19.
Post challenge Model- DEPs are delivered to mice
sensitized by IP OVA and alum. Mice sacrificed
d23.
Transgenic Mice: Mice exposed to nebulized
saline or DEPs for 1-h daily for 3 days. Mice
sacrificed d5.
Mild Sensitization: Exposure of previously
OVA sensitized mice to aerosolized DEP and
OVA did not affect OVA-specific IgE
production, BAL eosinophilia or methacholine-
induced AHR. Aerosolized particles induced
inflammation and increased MBP deposition
and MBP positive eosinophils in the mucosa.
IL-5 Transgenic: Exposure to aerosolized DEP
did not change BAL cytokine levels, but did
increase AHR and BAL cell count.
Classic Sensitization, Post-Challenge: Did
not lead to a discernable increase in OVA-
induced AHR. DEP treatment was associated
with increased airway inflammation and mucin
production in larger and intermediary airways.
Particle Size: Diameter: 2.5/ym
Reference: CAPs (Detroit: July-Sept. 2000;
Harkema et al. Harvard Ambient Fine Particle
(2004,056842) Concentrator)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: F344, BN
Age: 10-12wks
Weight: NR
Route: Inhalation Exposure Chamber. IT
Instillation.
Dose/Concentration: 4d concentration:
676±288/yg/m3, 5d concentration: 313± 119
/yg/m3, July concentration: 16-185 /yglm3,
September concentration: 81-755//g|m3; IT
Instillation- 200 fjL (soluble and insoluble)
Time to Analysis: F344 rats sensitized to
endotoxin, BN rats to OVA. Exposed 10h/d 1,4,
5d (consecutive). Another group of rats IT
instilled. Both groups killed 24h postexposure.
The retention of PM in the airways was
enhanced by allergic sensitization. Recovery of
anthropogenic trace elements was greatest
for CAPs-exposed rats. Temporal increases in
these elements were associated with
eosinophil influx, BALF protein content and
increased airway mucosubstances. A mild
pulmonary neutrophilic inflammation was
observed in rats instilled with the insoluble
fraction but instillation of total, soluble or
insoluble PM2.6 in allergic rats did not result in
differential effects.
July 2009
D-138
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Harrod et al.
(2003, 097046)
Species: Mouse
Gender: NR
Strains: C57BL/6
Age: 8-10wks
Use: Infected
with RSV
DEE: Diesel Engine Emissions
generated from a 5.9-liter turbo diesel
engine fueled by Number 2 fuel.
DEE Composition:
NOx: 2.0-43.3ppm
CO: 0.94-29.0ppm
SO?: 8.3-364.9ppb
Particle Size: for high 81 low level:
0.1-0.2//m (MMAD)
Route: DEE: Whole-body Inhalation
RSV: IT administration
Dose/Concentration: DEE: 38.8//gfm3 (low
level)
or
10027 /yglm3 (high level)
RSV: 100//I (1 Oepfu)
Time to Analysis: 6 h/d for 7d.
After the final 6h exposure period mice were
infected with RSV.
Parameters measured 4d post infection
Viral Gene Expression: For air+RSV, RSV-F
gene expression was not apparent but RSV-G
gene expression was detectable at very low
levels. In DEE+RSV (for high and low levels),
RSV-F and -G were markedly elevated. B-
Actin mRNA levels not changed in DEE-
exposed compared to air-treated. DEE+RSV
for high and low levels show 10- to 20- fold
induction of RSV-G mRNA levels as compared
to air+RSV.
Cell numbers in BALF: Uninfected low-level
DEE did not induce statistically significant
increase in cell numbers as compared to
air+RSV. High level DEE+RSV caused
increase as compared to air+RSV. Uninfected
high-level DEE had increase as compared to
uninfected air group. For all groups, alveolar
macrophages were predominant cell type and
no substantial changes in infiltrating cell
populations by exposure to DEE were noted.
Lung inflammation & Airway Epithelial
Morphology: Lung sections from air- or DEE-
exposed, uninfected did not exhibit any
observable change. Low level DEE + RSV had
increased inflammatory cell infiltration in
peribronchial regions and loss of normal
cuboidal appearance of Clara cells as
compared to air+RSV. High level DEE+RSV
had more apparent lung-inflammation,
especially surrounding bronchi and
bronchioles, and increased appearance of
pseudostratified, columnar epithelial cell
morphology and apparent airway epithelial cell
sloughing as compared to low level DEE+RSV,
indicating dose-related increase in lung
histopathology to RSV infection by prior DEE
exposure.
Inflammatory Mediators: TNF-a and IFN-n
were significantly increased in RSV-infected
mice exposed to low or high level DEE and not
increased in RSV-infected mice exposed to air.
TNF-a levels elevated to similar levels for low
and high level DEE+RSV. IFN-n exhibited more
dose-related increase with higher levels in high
level DEE+RSV versus low level DEE+RSV.
Mucous Cell Metaplasia: DEE exposure in
uninfected was not altered. Mucous
metaplasia was increased in epithelium of
RSV-infected mice when exposed to DEE in a
dose-dependent manner. Following high level
DEE+RSV, muscous staining of airway
epithelial cells in more distal airways was
occasionally observed.
CCSP Production in Airway Epithelium:
DEE alone did not have an effect CCSP-
producing cells, or Clara cells, decreased in
Low DEE + RSV iand further decreased in high
level DEE+RSV in large and terminal airways.
Surfactant Protein B: proSP-B staining post
RSV alone shows now discernible decrease
when compared to uninfected. Staining levels
in alveolar lung regions decreased when
exposed to low level DEE +RSV, and further
decreased in high level DEE+ RSV. Staining in
airway epithelium following high level
DEE+RSV diminished when compared to RSV
alone or low level DEE+RSV.
SP-A: In alveolar type II cells and airway
epithelial cells for untreated and air +RSV, no
discernible changes in levels. Prior exposure to
low or high level DEE decreased SP A staining
in alveolar type II cells and airways epithelial
cells during RSV infection.
July 2009
D-139
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Pollutant Exposure Effects
Reference: DEE (2 2000 model 5.9-1 Cummins ISB
Harrod et al. turbo diesel engines, No. 2 certification
(2005,088144) diesel fuel)
Species: Mouse Particle Size: NR
Gender: Male
Strain: C57B1/6
Age: 10-12wks
Weight: NR
macrophages. Higher doses had a
concentration-dependent increase.
Ciliated, Clara Cells, TTF-1: Generally,
ciliated cells decreased with exposure dose,
were more discernible in inflamed airways,
and higher doses caused effects in small distal
airways. Clara cells decreased equally at all
exposures and were most notable in the distal
airway epithelium. TTF-1 decreased
postinfection.
Route: Exposure Chamber
Dose/Concentration: Low- 30//gfm3 PM, Mid-
Low- 100/yg/m3PM, Mid-High- 300//g/m3PM,
High-1000 //g/m3 PM
Time to Analysis: Exposed 6hfd, 7dfwk, 1wk or
6m. 1wk exposure repeated on separate
occasion. Immediately after exposure, mice
anethetized, IT instilled with Pseudomonas
aeruginosa.
Bacterial Clearance: Lung bacterial
clearance was decreased at all levels after
1wk exposure and was concentration-
dependent 18h postinfection. Bacterial
clearance was not affected at 6m and
bacterial counts were higher.
Inflammation, Particle Deposition: Lung
inflammation and histopathology were
increased in all exposure groups postinfection.
All pynneiiro nrniinc nnQQOQQoH nartirlo.laHon
Reference:
Heidenfelder et al.
(2009,190026)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Brown-
Norway
Age: 10-12wks
Weight: NR
CAPs (Grand Rapids, Ml; July)
Particle Size: Diameter: 0.1-2.5/jm
Route: Whole-body Inhalation Chamber
Dose/Concentration: CAPs: 493±391 //g/m3;
0C: 244±144«g/m3, EC: 10±4/yg/m3, Sulfate:
79± 131 /yglm , Nitrate: 39±67 /yglm3,
Ammonium: 39 ± 59 /yglm3, Urban dust (Fe, Al,
Ca, Si): 18±6/yglm3
Time to Analysis: Sensitized to OVA 3d.
Challenged with OVA or saline 2wks later for 3d.
Exposed to CAPs 8h/d, 13d. OVA or saline
challenge 9d after first challenge. Sacrificed 24h
after last CAPs exposure.
CAPs enhanced the effects of OVA by causing
differential expression in genes primarily
involved in inflammation and airway
remodeling. CAPs exposure alone had no
effect on gene expression. CAPs+OVA also
increased IgE, mucin glycoprotein, and BALF
total protein, and caused a more severe
bronchopneumonia, increased mucus cell
metaplasia/hyperplasia and mucosubstances.
Reference:
Hiramatsu et al.
(2003,155846)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strains: BALB/c
and C57BL/6
Age: 8wks
Weight: 17-22g
DE -DE (generated by diesel engine and
diluted with filtered clean air)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Exposure Chamber
Dose/Concentration: Low dose -0.1 mgfm3
Highdose ¦ 3mg/m3
Time to Analysis: 1 or 3 months (7 h/d , 5 dfwk
Lung Histopathology: DEP-laden
macrophages accumulated in the alveoli and
peribronchial tissues in a dose- and duration-
dependent manner in both strains.
Lymphocytes and neutrophils increased in both
strains, but were greatest in the BALB/c mice.
BALF and Mac-1 Positive Cells: BALT
formation in DEP-laden AMs was seen at the
high dose group and was greater in the
BALB/c mice. Mac-1 positive cells, a marker
for phagocytic activation of the AMs, was
observed in the high dose groups of both
strains at 1 and 3 months, and in the low dose
group at 1 month in BALB/c mice.
Cytokine and il\IOS mRNA expression^
month of exposure increased TNF-a, IL-
12p40, IL-4 and IL-10 mRNA in a dose-
dependent manner. IL-1 B and iNOS decreased
in a dose-dependent manner. IFN-n mRNA
expression increased in BALB/c mice and
decreased in C57BL/6 mice. Similar results
were seen at 3 months, except IL-4 and IFN-n
mRNA expression decreased in the BALB/c
mice. In C57BL/6 mice, IL-4 and IL-10 mRNA
increased at the low dose but decreased at
the high dose. NF-nB activation occurred after
1 week and 1 month DE exposure and was
more prevalent in BALB/c mice.
July 2009
D-140
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Hiramatsu,
(2005, 088285)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strains: BALB/c
Age: 8wks
Weight: 17-22g
DE (generated by diesel engine and
diluted with filtered clean air.)
Mycobacterial Infection -
M.tuberculosis (ATCC35812) Kurono
strain
Particle Size: NR
Route: Exposure Chamber
Dose/Concentration: Low DE dose - 0.1 mgfm3
High DE dose ¦ 3mg/m3
Mycobaterial infection: 5mL (nebulized) of a 10e
colony-forming units (CFU) suspension
Time to Analysis: 1, 2 or 6m (7hfd, 5dfwk). 6
mice from each group infected on last day of DE
exposure. CFU evaluation 7wks postinfection.
Histopathological observations: DEP-laden
AMs and DEPs in the alveoli and peribronchial
tissues increased in a time-dependent manner.
DE-exposed mice had a greater number of
mycobacterial lesions, which were
disseminated. Lesions in the control mice had
clear borders and consisted of epithelial cells
and lymphocytes. Tubercle bacilli and DEPs
coexisted in AMs. BALT was seen around
DEPs in the 2 and 6-month exposure groups.
Inflammation cells increased in a time-
dependent manner with respect to DE
exposure.
Granulomatous lesions in lungs: 6-month
DE-exposed mice had a significantly higher
amount of gross lesions than the 6-month
control mice.
Mycobacterial burden: CFU in lungs were
increased in DE-exposed animals but only the
6 month exposure resulted in statistically
significant increases (a — 4-fold increase over
control). CFU in spleen were not significantly
altered by DE exposure.
Cytokines and il\IOS mRNA expression:
Infected DE-exposed mice had time-dependent
increases of TNF-a, IL-1B, IL-12p40, IFN-n
and ilMOS mRNAs compared to the infected
control mice. IL-12 mRNA expression
decreased in infected 6-month DE-exposed
mice.
Reference:
Ichinose, T. et al.
(2003, 041525)
Species: Mouse
Gender: NR
Strains:
BALB/cAnN, ICR,
and C3H/HeN
Age: 6wks
Weight: NR
DE: DE generated by 3059cc 4-cylinder Route: Exposure Chamber;
IT Instillation
diesel engine
Der f: Crude extract of D. farinae
Particle Size: DEP - Mass median
aerodynamic diameter: 0.4/ym
Dose/Concentration: 1. Air
2. DE only: 3.0mg/m3
3. Air + Der f: 1mg Derf
4. DE 3.0mg/m3 + 1mg Derf
Time to Analysis: DE: 8wks (12hfd, 7d/wk)
Der f: 2wk intervals, 6wks
Analyzed 3d after last instillation
Light microscopic observations: DE
exposure caused the proliferation of
nonciliated cells and epithelial cell
hypertrophy. Soot-containing macrophages
were found in the alveolar tissue spaces.
Accumulated lymphocytes were present in the
peribronchiolar lymphoid tissue. Inflammatory
cells and soot-containing macrophages were
found in the submucosal layer and the vessel
instertitium of mice treated with DE +Der f in
all strains. DE+Der f treated C3H/He mice had
desquamated goblet cells.
Eosinophil infiltration: DE treated C3HfHe
mice had a slight eosinophile infiltration in the
submucosal layer. DE+Der f treated mice in
all strains had a slight to moderate eosinophile
infiltration.
Lymphocyte accumulation: Lymphocytes
significantly increased in all strains under the
DE treatment as compared to the air+saline
treatment, and further increased under the
DE+Derf treatment.
Goblet cell proliferation: Little proliferation
was seen in all strains under the DE
treatment. DE+Der f caused a significant
increase in proliferation compared to air+Der f
in ICR mice, but a significant decrease in
C3H/He mice.
Local cytokine and chemokine expression
in lung tissue supernatant: DE -t-saline
significantly increased MIP-1a in all strains.
MCP-1 also increased but not significantly.
DE+Der f increased IL-5, RANTES, eotaxin,
MCP-1 and MIP-1a in all strains as compared
with air+saline and air+Der f. IL-5 decreased
in C3H/He mice treated with DE +Der f
compared to air+Der f. IL-3 decreased in ICR
and C3HfHe mice compared to air+saline.
Der f-specific immunoglobulin production
in plasma: Increased production of lgG1 was
statistically significant in ICR and C3HfHe
mice treated with DE+Der f as compared to
air+Der f. IgE was low in all strains.
July 2009
D-141
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Ichinose et al.
(2004,180367)
Species: Mouse
Gender: NR
Strains: BALB/c,
ICR and C3H/He
Age: 5wks
Weight: NR
DEP: 2740cc 4-cylinder engine
D. farinae-. crude extract
Particle Size: DEP - Mass median
aerodynmaic diamter of 0.4/ym
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 1. D. farinae-. 1 fjm in PBS
2. D. farinae + DEP: 1 /yg in PBS + 50/yg mg
DEP
Time to Analysis: 4 times at 2wk intervals.
Mice examined 3wks after last instillation
Histological changes: Mice in all three
strains treated with DEP+Z7. farinae had a
significant recruitment of eosinophils, more
proliferation of goblet cells, and more eotaxin
positive macrophages in the alveoli than mice
treated with D. farinae alone.
Local cytokine expression in lung tissue
supernatant: DEP +Z7. farinae induced
significant elevation of IL-5 in ICR and C3HfHe
mice as compared to D. farinae alone.
Production levels of IL-4 and RANTES did not
correlate with the manifestations of allergic
airway inflammation induced by the D. farinae
treatment with or without DEP.
Cytokine expression in plasma: IL-5 in
C3H/He mice treated with DEP+Z7. farinae
was significantly higher than D. farinae alone.
RANTES was unaffected by the DEP
treatment in all strains.
D. farinae-sfeaWc immunoglobulin
production in plasma: The adjuvant effect of
DEP on lgG1 production was observed in all
three strains, with C3H/H3 being statistically
significant. The production levels of IgG 1
correlated with the manifestations of
eosinophilic airway inflammation by both
treatments. No adjuvant effect on IgE
production was observed.
Reference:Inoue
et al. (2006,
097815)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: ICR
Age: 6wks
Weight: 29-33g
PM-0C: Urban PM, collected for 1
month during early summer, 2001 in
Urawa city Saitama, Japan
LPS
Particle Size: < 2.0mm, 40mg/m3
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: Vehicle group: PBS
PM-OC group: 4mg/kg of PM-OC
LPS group: 2.5mg/kg of LPS
PM-OC +LPS group: combined adminstration of
PM-OC +LPS
Time to Analysis: 24h after IT administration
Effects of PM-OC on LPS related lung
inflammation: PM-OC alone did not
significantly increase the infiltration of
neutrophils, but LPS challenge showed a
marked increase in the number of neutrophils
compared with vehicle. Administration of LPS
combined with PM-OC significantly increased
the infiltration of neutrophils compared with
LPS administration alone.
Effects of PM-OC on histological changes
in the lung: Combined treatment with PM-OC
and LPS resulted in enhanced neutrophilic
inflammation.
Effects of PM-OC on pulmonary edema
related to LPS: LPS group compared with
vehicle group had a significant increase in lung
water. The combined administration of PM-OC
and LPS resulted in further increase in the
lung water compared with LPS administration
alone, however it was not statistically
significant.
Effects of PM-OC on protein expression IL-
1BMIP-1a, MCP-1 and KC: The
concentrations of these molecules were below
the detection limits in the PM-OC group. LPS
treatment significantly increased the protein
levels of these molecules compared with the
vehicle treatment. In the PM-OC + LPS group
all concentrations, particularly KC, were
smaller than in the LPS group.
July 2009
D-142
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:Inoue
et al.(2006,
096720)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: ICR
Age: 6wks
Weight: 29-33g
Carbon black (14 nm PrinteX 90; 56nm
PrinteX 25; Degussa, Dusseldorf,
Germany)
Particle Size: 14nm ¦ 300 m2/g
56nm ¦ 45m2lg
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: Vehicle group: PBS at
pH7.4
LPS group: 2.5mg/kg of LPS in vehicle
Nanoparticle groups: 4 mg/kg carbon black
nanoparticles (14nm or 56 nm) in vehicle
LPS + nanoparticle group: combined
adminstration of carbon black and LPS in vehicle
Time to Analysis: 24h after IT administration
Effects of nanoparticles: Nanoparticles
alone increased number of total cells and
neutrophils, but not statistically significant.
LPS exposure significantly increased numbers
for both groups. Nanoparticles and/or LPS
enhance pulmonary edema.
Histological changes: Treatment with
LPS +14 nm nanoparticles marketly enhanced
neutrophil sequestration into the lung
parenchyma compared to LPS alone. LPS+56
nm nanoparticles did not.
Proinflammatory cytokine proteins: IL-1B
level significantly greater for both LPS +
nanoparticles groups. TNF-a was not
significantly altered among the experimental
groups.
Chemokine proteins: Challenge with 14nm
nanoparticles alone elevated the levels of all
chemokines without significance except for
KC. LPS alone and with both nanoparticle
groups caused significant increases in all
chemokines..
Formations of 8-OHdG in lung: LPS plus
nanparticles resulted in intensive expression 8-
OHdG, strongest in LPS + 14nm nanoparticle
Plasma coagulatory changes: PT - no
change for any group. APTT ¦ some change
with LPS and LPS + nanoparticle groups,
fibrinogen level significantly elevated after
LPS and for LPS + 14nm nanoparticle. APC
decrease with LPS (significant) and LPS +
nanoparticle groups. vWF increase with LPS
(significant) and LPS + 14nm (significant).
Reference:Inoue
et al. (2004,
087984)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: ICR
Age: 6wks
Weight: 29-33g
DEPs [4JB-1 type light-duty, four-
cylinder, 2.74 litre Isuzu diesel engine
(Isuzu Automobile Co., Tokyo Japan)]
Washed DEP and DEP-0C ¦ extracted
with dichloromethane
Particle Size: NR
Route: IT instillation
Dose/Concentration: Vehicle group: PBS
Washed DEP group: 4mg/kg of DEP DEP-0C
group: 4mg/kg of DEP-0C
LPS group: 2.5mg/kg of LPS Washed DEP+LPS
group: combined adminstration of washed DEP
+LPS
DEP-0C + LPS group: combined admininstration
of DEP-0C + LPS
Time to Analysis: 4h
COX-1 mRNA: Slightly elevated in both
washed DEP and DEP-0C groups, but slightly
decreased in other groups compared to vehicle
group.
COX-2 mRNA: Slightly increased with DEP-
0C, increased with LPS, washed DEP + LPS
and DEP-0C + LPS groups compared to
vehicle. COX-2 in the DEP-0C + LPS
decreased when compared to the LPS only
group.
Pulmonary Oedema: Washed DEP + LPS
group showed a synergistic enhancement of
pulmonary oedema and local expression of
proinflammatory chemokines (MCP-1, MIP-1a,
KC, IL-1B).
Reference:Inoue
et al. (2006,
190142)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: ICR
Age: 6-7wks
Weight: 29-33g
Carbon black (14 nm PrinteX 90; 56nm
PrinteX 25; Degussa, Dusseldorf,
Germany)
Particle Size: 14 nm ¦ 300 m2/g
56nm ¦ 45 m2/g
Route: IT instillation
Dose/Concentration: Vehicle group: PBS
Ovalbumin (OVA) group: 1mg OVA Nanoparticle
groups: 50mg carbon black nanoparticles (14nm
or 56nm)
OVA + nanoparticle group: combined
adminstration of nanoparticles and OVA
Time to Analysis: Vehicle group - weekly for
6wks
OVA group ¦ biweekly for 6wks
Nanoparticle groups - weekly for 6wks
OVA+Nanoparticle group (same protocol as OVA
and Nanoparticle) studied 24h after last
administration
Nanoparticles: Exposure to carbon
nanoparticles resulted in the lung expression
of TARC, GM-CSF and MIP-1a. The levels wre
higher in the 14nm group compared to the
56nm group.
OVA: In the presence of OVA, nanoparticles
enhanced levels of TARC, GM-CSF, MIP-1a,
IL-2 and IL-10, with the effects seen more
prominently in the 14 nm particles + OVA
group.
July 2009
D-143
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:Inoue
et al. (2005,
188444)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: ICR
Age: 6-7wks
Weight: 29-33g
Carbon black (14 nm PrinteX 90; 56nm
PrinteX 25; Degussa, Dusseldorf,
Germany)
Particle Size: 14 nm ¦ 300 m2/g
56nm ¦ 45 m2lg
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: Vehicle group: PBS
Ovalbumin (OVA) group: 1mg OVA Nanoparticle
groups: 50mg carbon black nanoparticles (14nm
or 56 nm)
OVA + nanoparticle group: combined
adminstration of nanoparticles and OVA
Time to Analysis: Vehicle group - weekly for 6
wks
OVA group ¦ biweekly for 6 wks
Nanoparticle groups - weekly for 6 wks
OVA+Nanoparticle group: same protocol as OVA
and Nanoparticle studied 24h after last
adminstration
Nanoparticles + OVA: Nanoparticles given
with OVA enhanced airway inflammation,
characterized by increased eosinophils,
neutrophils, mononuclear cells and goblet
cells. In addition, nanoparticles + OVA
significantly increased local expression of IL-4,
IL-5, eotaxin, IL-13, RANTES, MCP-1 and IL-6.
The formation of 8-OHdG was enhanced by
nanoparticles + OVA.
14nm nanoparticles: All these effects were
more prominent when 14nm nanoparticles
were used. The 14nm nanoparticle + OVA
group significantly raised levels of total IgE
and antigen specific production of lgG1 and
IgE.
Reference:Inoue
et al. (2006,
190142)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: ICR
Age: 6wks
Weight: 29-33g
Whole DE (generated by 4-cylinder,
3.059I, Isuzu diesel engine, Isuzu
automobile, Tokyo, Japan)
LPS
Particle Size: Peak particle size
110nm
Route: Whole-body Exposure Chamber
Dose/Concentration: 0.3mgsootfm3
1.0mgsoot/m3
3.0mg soot/m3
LPS: 125 mg/kg
Time to Analysis: LPS prior to
12h exposure to exhaust
BAL fluid, total cells, neutrophils, protein and
gene levels (MCP-1 and KC) ubcreased
compared to control with LPS, but were
smaller with LPS + DE. Results are suggestive
that short-term exposure to DE does not
exacerbate LPS related lung inflammation.
Reference: Inoue DEPs [4JB-1 type light-duty, four-
et al. (2007,
096702)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: ICR
Age: 6wks
Weight: 29-33 Ig
Cell Type
Splenocytes
cylinder, 2.74 litre Isuzu diesel engine
(Isuzu Automobile Co., Tokyo Japan)]
LPS
Particle Size: PM2.6
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: Splenocytes resuspended
to cell density of 1X106 mL-1 and 1000 mL
applied into each of 12-well plate
DEP: 100 mg mL-1
LPS: 1 mg mL-1
LPS(1mg mL-1) + DEP (1,10 or 100 mg mL-1)
Time to Analysis: 72h
Cell viability: No effect.
Mononuclear cell response: Incubation with
DEP alone inhibited basal cytokine production.
LPS significantly increased protein levels of
IFN-g, IL-2, and IL-10 compared to control.
DEP suppressed the LPS-enhanced protein
levels in a dose-dependent manner and
moderately elevated the IL-13 level.
Reference:Inoue
et al. (2007,
096702)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: ICR
Age: 6-7wks
Weight: 20-30g
Carbon nanoparticles (Dusseldorf,
Germany)
OVA (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO)
Particle Size: CB14 (PrinteX
90) - 14nm
CB56 (PrinteX 25) - 56nm
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 50//g and/or 1 fjg OVA in
PBS
Time to Analysis: 1Xfwk for 6wks; sacrifice
24h after last exposure
Lung Responsiveness: Respiratory system
resistance, Newtonian resistance and tissue
dampening were significantly higher in the
nanoparticle + OVA groups. Elastance and
tissue elastance were higher in these groups
but not significantly so. Compliance was
significantly lower in the nanoparticle + OVA
groups compared to the control.
Lung mRNA level for Muc5ac: levels were
significantly higher in nanoparticle + OVA
groups compared to the control.
Reference: Inoue DEP-OC collected from 4JB1 type, Route: IT Instillation
et. al. (2007,
096702)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: ICR
Age: 6-7wks
Weight: 29-34g
light duty, 4 cylinder, 2.74 liter Isuzu
diesel engine, Isuzu Automobile
Company, Tokoyo, Japan)
OVA
Particle Size: DEP - 0.4/jm
Dose/Concentration: 50//g and/or 1 //g OVA in
PBS
Time to Analysis: DEP or DEP-OC w/ or w/o
OVA initially; OVA or vehicle every 2wk for 6wks;
DEP components or vehicle 1X/wk for 6wks;
sacrifice 24h after last instillation
Total respiratory system resistance,
elastance, Newtonian resistance, tissue
damping, tissue elastance displayed general
positive trends and were significantly higher in
OVA and OVA + DEP-OC groups. Compliance
displayed a general negative trend and was
significantly lower in the washed DEP + OVA
group.
Reference: Ito et DEP - generated from 2982-cc common Route: Cell Culture
al. (2006,
088391)
Species: Rat
Cell Line: L2 cells
of alveolar
epithelial cell type
II origin
rail direct injection diesel engine with
oxidation catalyst and exahust gas
recirculation system.
Particle Size: PM2.6
Dose/Concentration: 1X106
1,10 or 30mg/mL
Time to Analysis: 3h
ICAM-1 and LDL receptor mRNA: Lip-
regulation in a dose-dependent manner.
Statistically significant at 30 mgfmL
compared to control.
HO-1 andPAF receptor mRNA: Up-regulation
in dose-dependent manner and statistically
significant at all doses compared to control.
Correlation between HO-1 and ICAM-1,
LDL, and PAF: Significant correlation
between HO-1 and each of these.
July 2009
D-144
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Jang
et al. (2005,
155313)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strains: BALB/c
Aqe: 5-6wks
DEP -generated from 4JB1 type, light
duty, four-cylinder diesel engine (Isuzu
Automobile, Co,Tokyo Japan)
Ozone - (generated with Sander Model
50 ozonizers,Sander, Eltze Germany)
OVA
Particle Size: NR
Route: Whole-body Exposure Chamber
Dose/Concentration: DEP: 2,000/ygl/yL (sic)
Ozone: 2 ppm (ave 1.98 ± 0.08 ppm)
OVA sensitization: 10 mg
OVA challenge:
Time to Analysis: OVA sensitization
DEP, Ozone and OVA Challenge on d21- 23
Exposed to ozone for 3h and DEP for 1h
AH and BAL measured 1 d after last challenge
Airway responsiveness: OVA + ozone +
DEP exposure group had significantly higher
methacholine-induce Ptnh than sham group or
OVA group.
Total cells, proportion of eosinophils and
neutrophils: the OVA + ozone + DEP group
was significantly higher than than OVA group
and 0VA+ Ozone group
IL-4: OVA + ozone, OVA + DEP and OVA +
ozone + DEP IL-4 level increased compare to
OVA group.
IFN-n: levels significantly decreased in OVA +
DEP and OVA + ozone + DEP compared to
OVA + ozone
Reference:
Jaspers et al.
(2005,088115)
Species: Human
Cell Lines: A549
cells, primary
human bronchial
and nasal
epithelial ells
DEas: aqueous-trapped solution of DE Route: Cell Culture. DEas and virus added to
(emissions from Caterpiller diesel
engine, model 3304)
Influenza: A/Bangkok/1/79 (H3PJ2
serotype)
Particle Size: NR
apical side of cells
Dose/Concentration: Influenza: 3 x 106 cells
infected with 320 hemagglutination units (HAU)
DEas: For A549 cells: 6.25,12.5, 25/yglcm2. For
bronchial and nasal cells: 22 or 44 //gfcm2.
Time to Analysis: 2h incubation with DEas then
virus added.
HA RNA levels analyzed at 0,15, 30, 60 or
120min post infection.
IFN and MxA responses: analyzed 24h post
infection.
Fluorescence: some cells treated with GSH-ET 30
min before DEasexposure. Measured 2 h post-
influenza infection.
A549 cells increased susceptibility: DEas
enhances HA RNA levels in A549 cells in a
dose-dependent manner. 25 mg/cm2
significantly enhanced levels in A549 cells
compared to the influenza-infected controls.
Viral protein levels were increased in A549
cells. Exposure to DEas increased the number
of influenza-infected epithelial cells in A549
cells.
Human nasal and bronchial cells
susceptibility: Exposure to DEas increased HA
RNA levels in the nasal and bronchial cells.
Statistically significant at 22mgfcm2 for nasal
cells and approaching significance at 44
mgfcm2 for bronchial cells. Exposure of both
types to 44 mg/cm2 enhanced viral protein
levels.
Influenza induced IFN response in A549:
Exposure to DEas does not suppress but
enhances IFNBmRNA levels. Treatment
enhanced influenza-induced nuclear levels of
both phospho-STAT-1 and ISFG3g. ISRE-
promoter activity was enhanced, but not
significantly. Treatment enhanced myxovirus
resistance protein (MxA) mRNA levels. This
data suggest that DEas exposure enhances
influenza virus replication without suppressing
production of IFNB or IFNB-inducible genes.
Influenza induced IFN response in human
nasal and bronchial cells: Exposure to DEas
increased IFNB and MxA levels.
Oxidative stress in A549: DEas exposure
dose-dependently increases oxidative stress in
A549 cells within 2-h post-exposure. Add the
antioxidant GSH-ET and it reverses the effect.
Pretreatment with GSH-ET A549 cells
reversed the effects of DEas on the number of
influenza-infected cells, and reduced HA RNA
levels.
Oxidative stress in Human bronchial cells:
The results were the same as A549 cells
pretreated with GSH-ET. Or Pretreatment with
GSH-ET also reversed effects of DEas on HA
RNA levels.
July 2009
D-145
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Kaan
and Hegele (2003,
095753)
Species: Guinea
pig
Gender: Female
Strain: Cam
Hartley
Age: 22-29d
Weight: 250-
300g
Cell Types
Alveolar
macrophages
(AM) obtained by
bronchoalveolar
PMio ¦ EHC-93 obtained (Environmental
Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada)
RSV ¦ Human RSV (long strain/lot18D)
(American Tissue Culture Collection,
Bethesda, MD)
Particle Size: PMio (0.35/ym MMAD)
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: PMio: 500//l/well (100
/yg/ml MEM)
RSV exposure:: 1 ml/well (6x106pfu/ml MEM)
Groups: PMio+RSV
RSV+PMio
RSV only
PMio only
negative control
Time to Analysis: PMio - 60min
RSV ¦ 90min
Parameters measured 24h post treatment
Interaction on phagocytic ability of AM:
Not affected by sequential exposure to RSV
and PMio. More than 95% of AM exposed to
PMio engulfed PM. AM exposed to PMio
showed significant increase in mean side
scatter in comparison to negative control and
RSV-infected AM. No significant difference
between AM exposed only to PMio and AM
exposed to both agents. No significant side
mean side scatter difference between AM
exposed to PM only and to both agents.
Interaction on RSV Immunopositivity:
PMio exposure inhibits. All RSV-treated groups
showed significantly greater proportion of
RSV'immunopositive cells compared with
negative control. PMio+RSV showed
significantly smaller proportion of RSV-
immunopositive cells compared with RSV
group. RSV+PMio group similar to RSV group.
Proportion of RSV-immunopositive AM was
influenced by the sequence of exposure to
RSV and PMio.
Interaction on RSV Replication: PM
exposure suppressed RSV replication. AM
exposed to both agents produced 3 to 9 fold
less RSV progeny compared with RSV alone
group. Quantity of RSV progency was not
significantly affected by the sequence of
exposure RSV and PMio. Negative control and
PMio only did not propagate progeny.
Interaction of RSV Yield: RSV alone group
produced the highest RSV yield, those exposed
to both agents, independent of sequence,
showed a 5-fold decrease.
Cytokine production: RSV infection
stimulated all three cytokines measure (IL-6,
IL-8 and TNF-a) compared to negative control.
IL-6: PMio significantly reduced RSV-induced
IL-6 production. IL-6 was affected by the
sequence of exposure to PMio and RSV
(PMio+RSV vs. RSV+ PMio, p < 3x10-6). IL-
8: PMio significantly decreases RSV-induced
IL-8 production and baseline. No affect on
sequence of exposure. TNF-a: production was
increased when exposed to RSV, PMio or a
combination of both agents. No differences
among treatments.
Reference:
Kleinman et al.
(2005, 087880)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strains: BALB/c
Age: 8-19wks
Weight: NR
CAPS: Concentrated fine (F) and
ultrafine (UF) Ambient Particles using
VACES system (performed a 2 sites in
Los Angeles, CA, on 50-m downwind
and another 150-m downwind from a
complex of three roadways, State
Road CA60, Interstate 10, and
Interstate 5.)
F CAPS in 2001 and 2002, UF CAPS in
2002 only
OVA: Ovalbumin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO)
Particle Size: UF: dp ~ 150 nm
F: dp ~ 2.5 /jm
Route: CAPS: inhalation via Whole-body chamber
exposure
OVA sensitization: nasal instillation
OVA challenge: inhalation
Dose/Concentration: UF at 50 m: 433 mgfm3
-UF at 150 m: 283 mg/m3
F at 50m or 150 m: average 400 /yg /m3
OVA sensitization: 50 /yg/5 /j\
OVA challenge: 30 mg/m3
Time to Analysis: CAPS: 4 h/d, 5 dfwk for
2wks
Sensitization: On morning of each exposure
1st Challenge: week after 10d of treatment
2nd Challenge: one week following 1st challenge
Sacrificed: 24h after 2nd challenge
There were significantly higher concentrations
of IL-5, IgE, IgG 1 and eosinophils in mice
exposed to either CAPS compared to air. Mice
exposed to CAPS at 50-m downwind showed
higher levels of IL-5, lgG1, and eosinophils
than those exposed to CAPS 150-m
downwind.
July 2009
D-146
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Kleinman et al.
(2007,097082)
Species: Mouse
Gender: NR
Strains: BALB/c
Aqe: 6-8wks
CAPS ¦ concentrated fine (F) and
ultrafine (UF) using VACES system ¦
performed a 2 sites in Los Angeles, CA,
on 50 m downwind and another 150 m
downwind from State Road CA60 and
Interstate 5. Fall 2001-summer 2004
OVA
Particle Size: F: PM2.6; UF: PMo.ib
Route: Whole-body Chamber
Dose/Concentration: 50m ¦ F: 394 ± 94 mg/m3
50m-UF: 297 ± 189 mglm3
150m - F: 387 ±68 mglm3
150m ¦ UF: 213 ±95 mglm3
OVA ¦ 50 mg in 5 mL saline
Time to Analysis: 3 2wk exposures (4 h|d,
5d|wk for 2 wks.
OVA the morning of each exposure
50m Site: higher levels and statistically
significant concentration curves of IL-5 and
lgG1 in F-CAP mice at the 50m site.
150m Site: in no cases were responses
greater than the 50m or control groups.
F vs. UF: The study was not able to
differentiate between the effects of F PM and
UF PM exposures.
Reference: Klein-
Patel et al. (2006,
097092)
Species: Cattle
and Human
Cell Types
Bovine tracheal
epithelial cells
(BTE) and Human
A 549 cells
ROFA (U.S. EPA NHEERL, Research
Triangle Park, NC)
V2O1,, V0S04, Si02 TiOz, Fe2(S04)s
NiS04LPS
Recombinant human TNF-a and IL-1B
Particle Size:
MMAD- 1.95mm
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 2x106
ROFA: 0, 2.5, 5,10,15, 20//gfcm2
LPS: 10Ong/mL
V205: 0, 0.15, 0.3, 0.61,1.25, 2.5, 5,10, 20
/yg/cm2
NiS04, Fe2(S04)s, Ti02, Si02: 0,1.23, 2.5, 5,10,
20/yg/cm2
V0S04: 0, 0.145, 0.29, 0.58,1.16, 2.32//gfcm2
Time to Analysis: LPS: 0, 6, or 18h
ROFA: 0, 2,4,6h
V205: 0,0.25,0.5,1,2,4, 6, 8h
NiS04, Fe2(S04)3, Ti02, Si02: 6h
V0S04: 6h
ROFA in BTE: ROFA and ROFA leachate
inhibition of LPS-induced TAP gene expression
increases with exposure time and dose.
Washed particles of ROFA at doses 2.5 to 10
mgfcm2 significantly increased inducible TAP
expression.
Soluble Metals in BTE: V2OE inhibition of
LPS and IL-1 B induced TAP gene expression
increases with exposure time and dose. NiS04
exhibits non-significant dose dependent
suppression of inducible TAP gene expression.
Fe2(S04)3, Ti02 and Si02 were found to have
no effect.
A549: Results with ROFA and V2O6 in BTE
were replicated using the A549 cell line and
IL_1 B to induce hBD2 gene expression.
Cellular Viability: Was not significantly
affected in ROFA doses below 20/yglcm2 and
V2O6/VOSO4 doses below 2.5 /yglcm .
Reference: Koike
and Kobayashi
(2005, 088303)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strains: Wistar
Age: 8-10 wks
Weight: 280-
350g
Cell Types
AM - aveolar
macrophages
PBM - peripheral
blood monocytes
T-cells: antigen
sensitized
Whole DEP: Diesel Exhaust Particles
collected in the dilution tunnel of a
diesel inhalation facility. (Ratio of
organic extract to residual particles in
the whole DEP was 3: 1.)
Organic extract of DEP
Residual particles of DEP
OVA: Ovalbumin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: Whole DEP: 10, 30,100
/yg/mL
Organic extract of DEP: 7.5, 22.5, 75/yglmL
Residual particles: 2.5, 7.5, 25/yglmL
Time to Analysis: 24h post exposure
la antigen and costimulatory molecules:
Most control AM did not express these
molecules. Whole DEP did not cause any
increase in expression level. 20% of control
PBM expressed la and 10% B7; expression of
these molecules was significantly increased by
whole DEP. Organic extract significantly
increased the expression of la and B7
molecules on PBM similar to whole DEP.
Residuals caused no effect.
PBM exposure to 100/75/25 //g/mL of
DEP/organic extract/residual particles:
Results showed that the DEP-increased
expression of la and B7 in PBM by DEP was
caused by the organic extract fraction.
Organic extract-induced expression of la
antigen in PBM was reduced by treatment
with NAC.
AP activity of PBM: After exposure to
organic extract, T cell proliferation was
significantly increased by the addition of
control PBM in a cell number-dependent
manner. AP activity of PBM was increased
over control by exposure to 3 mgfmL organic
extract, although higher concentrations
suppressed the activity of PBM.
Ctyokine production: Organic extract
treatment of PBM decrease IFNn production
from T-cells stimulated by PBM. No significant
effect on IL-4 observed.
HO-1 protein level: levels in PBM was
significantly increased by exposure to whole
DEP or organic extract. Levels induced by
organic extract was diminished by NAC
treatment.
July 2009
D-147
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:Last
et al. (2004,
097334)
Species: Mouse
Gender: NR
Strains: BALB/c
Age: 6wks
Weight: 16-20 g
PM - aerosol of soot and iron oxide
OVA (ovalbumin, grade V, 98% pure,)
Particle Size: PMoi- PM2.6
Route: PM Exposure Chamber
OVA - Intraperitoneal Injections; Aerosol Exposure
Dose/Concentration: PM - 235 - 256/yglm3
OVA ¦ 10 /yg/0.1 mL injection
OVA aerosol — 10mL of 10mg/mL (1 %) solution
Time to Analysis: PM: 4hfd, 3 dfwk
OVA: 2 ip injections days 1 and 15. Aerosol on
day 28 after first ip; 60 min 3x/wk
2wl< PM exposure/4wl< OVA aerosol
treatment: The OVA alone group had
significantly more airway collagen than the
PM alone group. Histology showed
significantly more collagen in the treatment
than the air alone group. There was a
significantly greater amount of goblet cells
than the OVA alone group.
4wl< OVA aerosol/2wl< PM treatment: The
treatment had significantly more goblet cells
than the PM alone group.
6wl< concurrent PM and OVA treatment:
Significantly more cells were observed in the
OVA alone group over the treatment. The
treatment had significantly more lymphocytes
and significantly less macrophates than
groups exposed to PM before or after OVA.
Histology showed significantly more collagen
in the treatment than the air or PM alone
groups. The treatment had significantly more
goblet cells than the OVA alone group.
Reference: Li et
al. (2007,
093156)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: BALB/c,
C57BL/6
Age: 9wks
Weight: NR
DEP (2369-cc diesel engine
manufactured by Isuzu Motor, operated
at 1050 rpm, 80% load, commercial
light oil)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Exposure Chamber
Dose/Concentration: DEP: 103.1 ±9.2/yglm3,
CO: 3.5±0.1ppm, NO2: 2.2±0.3ppm, SO2:
< O.OIppm
Time to Analysis: Protocol 1: Exposed 7hfd,
5d/wk. Sacrificed at day 0, week 1,4, 8.
Protocol 2: DE alone or DE+NAC 7h/d, 1 -5d.
Airway hyperresponsiveness: Penh values
increased in BALB/c mice compared to the
control at day 0, but no significant changes
occurred after this time. Penh values
increased in C57BL/6 mice at 1wk compared
to the control but returned to control levels at
8wks.
BALF: Compared to the other strain, the total
number of cells and macrophages increased
significantly at 1wk in C57BL/6 mice and at
8wks in BALB/c mice. Neutrophils,
lymphocytes, MCP-1, IL-12, IL-10, IL-4, IL-13
increased significantly for both strains. No
eosinophils were found. IL-1B and IFN-n
increased significantly in BALB/c mice
compared to C57BL/6 mice.
HO-1 mRNA and protein: HO-1 mRNA was
more marked in BALB/c mice at 1wk and
C57BL/6 mice at 4 and 8wks. HO-1 protein
percentage changes from the control were
greater in BALB/c mice at 1wk and C57BL/c
mice at 8wks.
NAC: NAC inhibited the increased Penh
values, total number of cells and macrophages
in C57BL/6 mice at 1wk and neutrophils and
lymphocytes in both strains.
Reference: Li et
al. (2009,
190424)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: BALB/c
Age: 6-8wks
Weight: NR
CAPs (downtown Los Angeles, CA
from major freeway, traffic mainly
passenger cars and diesel trucks; Jan.
2007 or Sept. 2006)
Ultrafine carbon black (UFCB; used as
control)
Particle Size: Diameter: Fine- < 2.5
/jm, UF- < 0.15 /jm
Route: Intranasal Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 0.5/yg PM in 50 fjL
suspension
Time to Analysis: Day 1 exposed to PM or
saline. Day 2 exposed to PM+OVA or OVA or
saline alone. Repeated on days 4, 7, 9. Different
experiment: NAC ip injected 4h pre-instillation on
days 1, 2, 4, 7, 9. All animals rested and OVA
aerosol challenged 30min on days 21, 22.
Sacrificed day 23.
UFP alone had no effect on the lung.
UFP+OVA significantly increased eosinophils,
and OVA-specific lgG1 and IgE. The induction
of eosinophils and lgG1 were inhibited by
NAC. Generally, UFP+OVA mice had greater
signs of inflammation than the other groups as
determined by pulmonary histopathology and
airway morphometry. UFP had a greater PAH
content than fine particles. UFP significantly
increased IL-5, IL-13, TNF-a, IL-6, KC, MCP-1,
and MIP-1a.
Reference: Li et
al. (2009,
190424)
Species: Mouse
Cell Line:
Macrophage RAW
264.7
CAPs (downtown Los Angeles, CA
from major freeway, traffic mainly
passenger cars and diesel trucks; Jan.
2007 or Sept. 2006)
Ultrafine carbon black (UFCB; used as
control)
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 1, 5, 8.3,10/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: Particle suspensions
reconstituted with Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's
Medium powder. Further replenished with 10%
fetal calf serum and 1:200 dilution of
fjm, UF- < 0.15 fjm
16h. 100/yg of lysate protein for HO-1
immunoblotting.
UFP induced greater HO-1 expression than fine
particles. The higher PAH content of UFP
correlated with HO-1 expression.
Particle Size: Diameter: Fine- < 2.5 penicillin/streptomycin/amphotericin B. Incubated
July 2009
D-148
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Liu et al. (2008,
156709)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: BALB/c
Age: 11wks
Weight: NR
DEP (5500-watt single-cylinder diesel
engine generator (Yanmar, Model YDG
5500E), 406 cc displacement air-
cooled engine, Number 2 Diesel
Certification Fuel, 40 weight motor oil)
Particle Size: MMAD: —0.1 /jm
Route: Intranasal Exposure
Dose/Concentration: Average particle
concentration: 1.28mg/m3
Time to Analysis: Four groups: saline+air
control, saline+DEP, A fumigatus+air,
A. fumigatus+U£P. A. fumigatus exposure every
4d for 6 doses. DEP exposure 5h/d for 3wks
concurrent with A. fumigatus exposure.
A. fumigatus+DEP increased IgE, the mean
BAL eosinophil percentage, goblet cell
hyperplasia, and eosinophilic and mononuclear
cell inflammatory infiltrate around the airways
and blood vessels compared to the A.
fumigatus or DEP treatments.
A.fumigatus+BtP also caused methylation at
the IFN-n promoter sites CpG'63, CpG46, and
CpG'206.
Reference: Liu et
al. (2007,
093093)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: BALB/c
Age: 11wks
DEP: 5500-watt single-cylinder diesel
engine.
Particle Size: NR
Route: Inhalation Exposure
Dose/Concentration: Average particle
concentration 1.28 mg/m3.
Time to Analysis: 1. Aerosol vehicle (saline) +
air
2. Aerosol vehicle (saline) + DEP
3. A. fumigatus + air
4. A. fumigatus + DEP
A. fumigatus-. 62.5 /yg aerosolized protein extract
in 50 fjl PBS; 6 total doses, every 4d.
DEP exposure 5h/d 3wks concurrent with A.
fumigatus.
IgE Production: IgE production increased
withtheA/tf/n/^atetreatmen and increased
further with the A.fumigatus and DEP
treatment.
Histopathology: A. fumigatus with DEP
caused an increase in goblet cell hyperplasia
and eosinophil and mononuclear cell infiltrate
around the airways and blood vessels as
compared to the control and DEP treatments.
Gene Methylation: Greater methylation at
the CpG'63 site of the IFN-n promoter occurred
under the A. fumigatus + DEP treatment
compared to the A. fumigatus or DEP
treatments. The DEP treatment did not induce
methylation. Methylation correlated with
increased IgE and hypomethylation with
decreased IgE. Hypomethylation occurred in
the IL-4 promoter under the A. fumigatus +
DEP treatment.
Reference:
Lundborg et al.
(2007, 096040)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strains:Sprague-
Dawley
Age: NR
Weight: 300-
400g
difference existed with the washed diesel
particles.
Survival of the ATCC strain and clinical
isolates of S. pneumoniae when incubated
with carbon loaded AM or control AM:
Carbon significantly increased the CFU of
opsonized and unopsonized bacteria for the
ATCC strain and clinical isolates.
Ability of carbon or washed diesel loaded
AM, incubated with the ATCC strain of S.
pneumoniae, to induce LPO of lung
surfactant: A 97% increase in the surfactant
LPO occurred after incubation with washed
diesel loaded AM compared to contol AM. The
effect of washed diesel particles was
significantly greater than that of carbon
particles.
LPO by carbon loaded AM incubated with
the ATCC strain or clinical isolates in the
presence of absence of surfactant: LPO
induced by AM increased when incubated with
carbon loaded AM compared to control AM.
Carbon-Black Particles (93% C)
Toluene- DEPs (97% C)
10-fold Cr, Mn, N; 50-100 fold Al, Cd,
Cu, Fe, Mg, Pb, Zn more in DEP
aggregates
Particle Size: Carbon aggregates-
mean diameter - 0.17 ± 0.08um
Diesel
Particles- mean diameter: 0.69 ±
0.46/ym
mean size primary particles: 0.044 ±
0.01 fjm
Route: Cell Culture{Citation}
Dose/Concentration: 2 X 10I!AM
A 2mL suspension was prepared with 20 //gfmL
of carbon or diesel particles added.
surface area: 159 ± 4m2lg
Time to Analysis: 6 different experiments. AM
pre-exposed to carbon or washed DEP. Loaded
with particles. Incubated with S. pneumoniae,
ATCC strain or clinical isolates.
Effect of time on survival of S.
pneumoniae when incubated with carbon
loaded AM: Loading AM with carbon
significantly increased the bacterial survival.
Bactera opsonization decreased bacterial
survival.
Effect of carbon load in AM on survival of
S. pneumoniae-. Bacterial survival increased
in a dose-dependent manner as the carbon
particle load of AM increased.
Survival of S. pneumoniae after
incubation with carbon or washed diesel
loaded AM: Bacterial survival increased in
carbon loaded AM compared to the control. No
July 2009
D-149
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Matsumoto et al.
(2006,189213)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strains: BALB/c
Age: 6wks
Weight: 15-20g
DE
DE collected from a 2369 cm3 diesel
engine operated at 1050 rpm and 80%
load with commercial light oil. Engine
exhaust passed through a particulate
air filter and charcoal filer. Diluted DE
introduced into the exposure chamber.
Composition of the DE: 3.5±0.1ppm
CO, 2.2±0.3ppm NO2, < 0.01 ppm SO2
and 103.1 ±9.2//g/m3 DEP.
Particle Size: NR
Route: Whole-body exposure chambers after
prior sensitization with OVA through ip injection
Dose/Concentration: 100//gfm:l DE
Time to Analysis: Mice were initially sensitized
wf OVA (20ug absorbed to 2 mg alum diluted
with 0.5 mL saline) via ip injection on day 0, 6
and 7. Two weeks later the mice were challenged
with OVA (0.1 mg in 0.1mL saline) intranasally on
day 21.
DE for 1d or 1,2, 3, 4 or 8wks (at 7h/d for
5d/wk).
Airway Hyper-Responsiveness: Airway
Reactivity (evaluated by an increase in PenH)-
Exposure to DE significantly increased airway
reactivity to methacholine after 1 week in
both 24 and 48 mg/mL Mch and after 4 weeks
in the 48 mg/mL. Airway Sensitivity
(evaluated by PC200)- DE exposure caused an
increase in airway sensitivity after 1 week of
exposure, 4 weeks and 8 weeks of exposure
did not result in a significant increase.
BAL Cell Counts: The total cell count was
increased after 1 week of DE exposure. This
increase was mostly due to an increase in
eosinophils. After 1 week the total cell count
dropped drastically even after continuous
exposure to DE. DE did not effect the number
of CD3, CD4, CD8 or NK1 cells at any point in
time.
Cytokine/Chemokine mRNA Levels: DE
exposure on day 1 caused an increase in
mRNA levels of IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13 when
compared to the control mice but longer
periods of DE exposure failed to cause an
increase. Protein levels of IL-4 were
significantly elevated at compared to control
at day 1, but did not persist with time. mRNA
levels of MDC were increased at 1 week of
exposure (compared to control) but also
decreased at time periods after. mRNA levels
of RANTES were increased at 2 and 3 weeks
after exposure and remained elevated at 4
weeks but not significantly. The level of
RANTES protein increased as the weeks went
along, but increased significantly only at 8
weeks. Lung
Histopathology: OVA sensitization caused an
increase peribronchial and perivascular
infiltration of inflammatory cells which peaked
at 1 week after exposure and decreased
afterward. DE exposure did not causefshow
any additional signs of inflammation.
Reference:
Morishita et al.
(2004, 087979)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Brown-
Norway
Age: 10-12wks
Concentrated Air Particles (CAPs)
CAPs were generated from ambient air
in an urban Detriot community. The
sampling site was chosen because it
has a high percentage of pediatric
asthma and is located near a lot of
industry.
Particle Size: 0.1-2.5 /jm
Route: Whole-body Inhalation Chambers
Dose/Concentration: Air chamber received
CAPs at a flow rate of 50 L/min and at a
pressure of 0.94-0.95 atm.
July 676/yg/m3
September 313/yg/m3
Time to Analysis: First rats were sensitized
(days 1-3) and challenged (days 14-16) with
saline (control) or ovalbumin by intranasal
instillation (5% in saline, 150 //Lfnasal passage).
4 days after the last intranasal challenge, rats
began exposure in the chambers. Exposures were
10 h long. There were two separate exposure
periods in July and September. The July exposure
was for 4 consecutive days. The September
exposure was for 5 consecutive days.
Recovery of Trace Elements in Animal
Lung Tissues: July Exposure- Anthropogenic
trace elements were below limit of detection
in pulmonary tissue of animals exposed to July
CAPs. September Exposure- Several elements
were recovered from pulmonary tissue during
the Sept. exposure. La concentrations were
increased in both control/CAPs exposure and
in the OvafCAPs exposure groups. V
concentration was increased in OvafCAPs
exposed animals but not in rats exposed to
just CAPs. S content was only significant in
animals exposed to OvafCAPs compared to the
non-exposed control.
Particle Characterization: July PM had an
average mass concentration twice as high as
the September mass concentration. S
concentration was four-folds higher in July
PM. In the September PM- the concentration
of La was 12.5 fold higher than in July PM, V
was 2.7 fold higher than in July PM and Mn
was 1.5 fold higher than in July PM.
BALF Analysis: Eosinophil concentration was
not significantly different when comparing
rats exposed to CAPs only in either July or
September (this was explained by the elapsed
time between exposure and BALF collection).
However OVA and CAP exposure in the
September group led to elevated eosinophil
levels. Similarly, the protein content was only
significantly increased in the September
OVA/CAP exposed rats, compared to the
control group.
July 2009
D-150
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Nygaard et al.
(2005, 088655)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: BALB/c
Aqe: 6-7 weeks
Coarse and fine ambient air particles
collected in Rome (spring), Oslo (1-
summer, fine only, 2- following spring,
fine and coarse), Lodz (summer) and
Amsterdam (spring). These represent
areas with high population and
dominance of traffic.
DEP (Standard reference material
1650a) used as a positive control.
Particle Size: Fine PM0.1 ¦ 2.5 /m;
Coarse PM 2.5 ¦ 10/ym
Route: Subcutaneous Injection into mouse
footpads.
Dose/Concentration: 100/yg of particle
Time to Analysis: Animals were in eight groups:
1. Control- Hank's Balanced Salt Solution
2. OVA- 50ug 3. OVA (50ug)+ Amsterdam
Coarse PM (100/yg) 4. OVA (50ug)+ Amsterdam
Fine PM (100/yg) 5. OVA (50ug)+ Lodz Coarse
PM (100 //g) 6. OVA (50ug) + Lodz Fine PM (100
/yg) 7. 5. OVA (50ug)+ Oslo Coarse PM (100/yg)
8. OVA (50ug)+ Oslo Fine PM (100/yg)
Analysis 5d after injection
Cell Numbers and Cell Phenotypes in the
Lymph Node: The overall number of B
lymphocytes, lymph node cells, PLN cells, and
the expression of MHC class II, CD86 and
CD23 on B lymphocytes were increased by
coexposure of 0VA + the particles compared
to the OVA or particle groups alone. The OVA
+ particle groups displayed a significant
decrese in T lymphocytes. Particles only
significantly increased the number of lymph
node cells and MHC Class II expression. There
were no differences observed between coarse
and fine PM fractions.
Cytokine Production by Lymph Node (ex
vivo culture of popliteal lymph node cells):
The OVA + particle (DEP and Oslol only)
significantly increased IL-4 and IL-10 levels.
No change was observed in IFIM-d. The particle
groups only increased IL-4 and IL-10. All
coarse and fine particle fractions co-exposed
with OVA significantly increased IL-4 and IL-
10 compared to OVA alone. There was no
significant difference between coarse and fine
particles. IFN-n levels were not significantly
affected by most of the groups, but the fine
fractions of PM consistently produced higher
levels of IFN-n.
Lymph Node Histology: OVA + particle
groups resulted in significantly enlarged lymph
nodes and the formation of germinal centers.
Reference:
Nygaard et al.
(2005, 087980)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strains: BALB/c
Aqe: 6-8wks
Polysterene Particles (PSP
Particle Size): PSP diameter: 0.1 /ym
Route: Subcutaneous Injection into footpads.
Dose/Concentration: 40/yg PSP (5.94 X 10,G
particles) per injection suspended in HBSS. One
injection per footpad
Time to Analysis: 1. HBSS
2. OVA (10 /yg per injection)
3. PSP (40 /yg per injection)
4. OVA (10/yg per injection) + PSP (40 /yg per
injection).
Antibody experiments: reinjected with 10 /yg
OVA on day 21. Killed on day 26.
Popliteal lymph node cell experiments - animals
injected. Killed 1 to 21 d post-injection.
OVA-specific IgE, IgG 1 and lgG2a
Antibodies: Analysis at day 26 indicated IgE,
IgG 1 levels were significantly higher in mice
exposed to OVA+PSP compared to mice
injected with HBSS, OVA or PSP. No
significant difference was observed for lgG2a
levels.
Number of Particle Containing Cells: There
was no significant difference between PSP
alone and OVA+PSP. Throughout days 0 -21
the number of particle-containing cells in the
PSP or 0VA+ PSP groups were significantly
greater than the HBSS group.
Total Cell Numbers, B and T Lymphocytes
and MHC class II Expression: The total cell
number and B lymphocytes significantly
increased by coexposure to OVA + PSP when
compared to the other groups. Both OVA and
OVA+PSP increased T lymphocytes on Days
1, 3 and 5. MCH class II expression was
significantly higher in the OVA +PSP group on
days 5, 7 and 21 than other groups.
Cell Types and Surface Markers: The
number of CD40 + B Lymphocytes showed a
slight but significant decrease with OVA+PSP
and OVA compared to HBSS and PSP.
CD86+, CD23+ and CD69+ B lymphocytes
were significantly higher in OVA +PSP group
than other groups. PSP alone did not affect
CD86+ or CD23+ levels.
Cytokine Production: IL-4 and IL-10 were
significantly higher in the OVA +PSP group
when compared to the other groups. OVA
alone caused a slight increase compared to
PSP. PSP did not alter IL-4 or IL-10 levels.
July 2009
D-151
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Nygaard et al.
(2004, 058558)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: BALB/c
Age: 6-7wks
Weight: NR
CB (carbon blackfDEP)
Polystrene Particles (PSP)
Particle Size: PSP diameter: 0.0588,
0.202,1.053, 4.64 or11.14//m
Route: Single subcutaneous injection into
footpad
Dose/Concentration: 10//g OVA + 40//g (low
dose) or 200 fjg (high dose) of particles
Time to Analysis: Mice killed 5d after OVA
injection; PLN excised
OVA Specific IgE and Ig2a: OVA with CB,
DEP or PSP of diameters 0.0588 and 0.202
fjm increased IgE compared to OVA alone, as
well as the 1.053, 4.64 and 11.14//m PSP.
OVA with 0.0588 fjm PSP or CB significantly
increased lgG2a compared to OVA alone.
Primary Cellular Response: All OVA and
PSP groups (except the low dose of 11.14 //m
PSP) had more total lymph node cell numbers
than the OVA alone group. The low and high
does groups of 0.202 fjm PSP had the
greatest amount of cell proliferation and
lymphoblasts. The OVA and 0.202 PSP
treatment produced the greatest amounts of B
lymphocytes, IL-4, IL-10 and IFN-n. IL-2 in the
PLN cells was significantly lower in both
dosage groups of OVA and 0.202 PSP than
the OVA control.
Particle mass, size, number and surface
area: Total particle surface area explained
64% of the variance in the IgE levels. 60-80%
variance of the PLN cellular paramters (except
CD23) were explained by total particle surface
area, number and diameter.
Reference: Reed
et al. (2008,
156903)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male,
Female (only
BALB/c)
Strain: C57BL/6,
A/J, BALB/c
Age: NR
Weight: NR
GEE (two 1996 General Motors 4.3-L
V-6 engines; regular, unleaded, non-
oxygenated, non-reformulated gasoline
blended to US average consumption for
summer 2001 and winter 2001-2002-
Chevron-Phillips)
Particle Size: MMAD: 150nm
Route: Inhalation Exposure Chamber
Dose/Concentration: PM: Low- 6.6±3.7//g|m3,
Medium- 30.3±11.8//gfm3, High- 59.1 ±28.3
Z^g/m3
Time to Analysis: A/J- 2wk quarantine period in
chamber. Exposed 6h/d, 7d/wk, 3d-6m. C57BL/6-
1wk exposure. Instillation of P. aeruginosa. Killed
18h post instillation. BALB/c- Conditioned to
exposure chambers and mated. Pregnant females
exposed GD 1 and throughout gestation.
Offspring exposures continued until 4wks-old.
Half of offspring sensitized to OVA. Tested for
airway reactivity by methacholine challenge 48h
postinstillation and euthanized.
The kidney weight of female A/J mice
decreased at 6m and was strongly related to
PM by the removal of emission PM. PM-
containing macrophages increased by 6m.
Hypomethylation occurred in females at 1wk.
The clearance of P. aeruginosa was
unaffected by exposure. Serum total IgE
significantly and dose-dependently increased.
OVA-specific IgE and lgG1 gave slight
exposure-related evidence but were not
significant.
Reference: Reed
et al. (2008,
156903)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male,
Female
Strain: CDF
(F344)/CrlBR,
SHR
Age: NR
Weight: NR
GEE (two 1996 General Motors 4.3-L
V-6 engines; regular, unleaded, non-
oxygenated, non-reformulated Chevron-
Phillips gasoline, U.S. average
consumption for summer 2001 and
winter 2001-2002)
Particle Size: MMAD: 150nm
Route: Inhalation Exposure Chamber
Dose/Concentration: PM: Low- 6.6±3.7/yglm3,
Medium- 30.3±11.8//gfm3, High- 59.1 ±28.3
Z^g/m3
Time to Analysis: 2wk quarantine period in
chamber. Exposed 6h/d, 7d/wk, 3d-6m. SHR-
surgery to implant telemeter in peritoneal cavity.
4wks recovery. ECG data obtained every 15min
beginning 3d preexposure, 7d exposure, 4d
postexposure.
Organ Weight: At 6m exposure, the heart
weights of male and female rats increased and
male rats' seminal vesicle weight decreased.
Histopathology: PM-containing macrophages
increased by 6m.
Serum Chemistry: Serum alanine
aminotransferase, aspartate
aminotransferase, and phosphorus decreased
in medium and high-exposure females.
Hematology, Clotting Factors: Hematocrit,
red blood cell count, and hemoglobin dose-
dependently increased for both genders at
both time points. Plasma fibrinogen increased
at 1wk in males.
Lung DNA Damage: Hypermethylation
occurred in medium- and high-exposure male
rats at 6m.
BAL: For both genders in the high-exposure
group, LDH and MIP-2 significantly increased
at 6m. R0S decreased at 1wk and 6m.
Generally, the production of hydrogen peroxide
and superoxide decreased in the high-exposure
group and medium- and high-exposure groups,
respectively.
CV effects in SHR: Lipid peroxides were
significantly increased in males in the high
exposure group. TAT complexes decreased in
females in the high exposure group.
Removal of Emission PM: The removal of
emission PM strongly linked PM to increased
seminal vesicle weight, red blood cell counts,
LDH, lipid peroxides, and methylation.
July 2009
D-152
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Roberts et al.
(2007,097623)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Age: 10wks
Weight: 250-
300g
R-Total - ROFA (Residual oily fish ash)
Sample
R-Soluble - Soluble fraction of ROFA
R-Chelex - R-Soluble+Chelex
(insoluble resin)
Particle Size: Mean diameter- 2.2//m
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 10mg/kg of body weight
(2.5-3mg)
Time to Analysis: Pre exposure to ROFA
samples on Day 0. Inoculation with 5 x 10'L.
Monocytogenes or saline on day 3. Sacrifice on
days 6, 8,10.
Uninfected groups: Compared to the contols,
the R-total and R-soluble groups had increased
LDH, PMNs, lymphocytes and AMs. The R-
total group had a slight, but significant
increase in IL-6 and the R-soluble group had a
decrease in IL-2.
Infected groups: The R-soluble group had
increased levels of LDH (which also increased
for the R-total group), albumin, BAL cells, NK
cells, PMA-stimulated and zyomason-
stimulated CL compared to all other groups at
various time points. NOx was significantly
elevated in the R-soluble group at early time
points, but in later time points R-soluble and
R-total AMs produced less NOx than the
controls. IL-10 and IL-6 increased in the R-
soluble group, while IL-12, IL-4 and IL-2
decreased. IL-12 also decreased in the R-total
group.
Reference:
Saxena et
al.(2003, 054395)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: C57B1/6J
Age: 18-30wks
Weight: NR
DEPs (standard)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Intrapulmonary Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 10 0 //cj; mouse
Time to Analysis: Pre exposure to 2.5 x 10"
bacillus Calmette-Guerin bacteria (BC G) with or
without coadministration of DEP. Sacrifice 5wks
later.
The BC G + DEP group had four times the BC
G lung load than BC G alone. The load was
significantly greater in other organs in the BC
G + DEP group. Interstitial lymphocytes, T, B
and NK cells were increased in the BC G +
DEP group over the DEP-alone group. DEP
caused no release of NO by AMs, but inhibited
the release of NO in response to IFN-n. Except
for CD8 cells, no increase in IFN-n was seen in
the BC G + DEP group.
Reference:
Schneider et al.
(2005, 088368)
Species: Mouse
Strain: BALB/c
Cell Line: RAW
264.7
macrophage cells
SRM 1648 (greater than 63%
inorganic carbon; 4-7% organic carbon;
Si, S, Fe, Al, K greater than 1 % by
weight; Mg, Pb, Na, Zn, CI, Ti, Cu, As,
Cr, Ba, Br, Mn less than 1%)
Titanium dioxide
Particle Size: Ti02 - 0.3/jm average,
1.0 /jm max
SRM 1648 - 0.4/ym mean diameter
Route: Cell Culture (625,000 cells/cm2 in 96 well
plate)
Dose/Concentration: 62.5//gfcm2
Time to Analysis: Particulate introduction at 0,
7.8,15.6, 31.2, and 62.5 /yglcm2. Measurements
made at 1, 3, 6, and 12h after particulate
introduction.
No significant toxicity was exhibited by SRM
1648. The rate of dye oxidation was
significantly higher in SRM 1648-exposed
cells. SRM 1648 significantly increased
reduced glutathione compared to the control
at the 12-h time point. SRM 1648 increased
GSH and concurrently caused significant PGE2
production compared to the no ester control at
the 6-h and 12-h time points.
Reference:
Schober et al.
(2006,097321)
Species: Human
Gender: Male and
Female
Age: 21 -39yrs,
treatment group;
23-32yrs, control
group
Tissue Type:
Whole blood
samples
PM - organic extracts of airborne
sample
AERex,d - urban aerosol 1 day sample
(total air volume ¦ 1270m3)
AERex6d- urban aerosol 5 day sample
(total air volume ¦ 6230m3)
rBet v 1 (birch pollen allergen 1a,
Biomay, Vienna, Austria)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 100//L heparinized whole
blood
Time to Analysis: Blood stimulated with PBSflL-
3 for 10min. Incubated with rBet v 1 alone or
with AERex for 20min. Ice bath 5min. Incubated
with antibody reagent 20min.
Nine organic compound classes were identified
in AERex,dand AERex6d, with AERex,dhaving
20 times more PAHs. Basophil activation
increased in all treatment groups up to 90%,
with AERex,d being the most pronounced. 5-50
fold lower concentrations of AERex,dwere
needed to achieve the maximal effect on
basophil activation. AERex-induced
enhancement of CD63 upregulation of rBet v
1 in sensitized basophils occurred in a dose-
dependent manner.The AERex-alone treatment
did not affect CD63 expression.
July 2009
D-153
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Shwe
et al.
(2005,111553)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strains: BALB/c
Age: 8 wks
Weight: NR
CB - carbon black particles (Degussa,
Germany)
CB14:
C: 96.79%
H: 0.19%
N: 0.13%
S: 0.11%
Ash: 0.05%
Others including 0: 2.74%
CB95:
C: 97.98%
H: 0.15%
N: 0.28%
S: 0.46%
Others including 0: 1.14%
Particle Size: CB14 - 14nm primary
particle size (pps)
CB95 - 95nm (pps)
Route: IT instillation
Dose/Concentration: 25,125, or 625/yg in 1
mL saline solution
Time to Analysis: CB14 or CB95 instillation
1/wk for4wks
Sacrifice 24 or 4h after last instillation
BAL cells: In CB14, the total number of BAL
cells increased significantly and dose-
dependently. In CB95, only the 625/yg dose
showed a significant increase.
Cytokine and chemokine: For CB14 and
CB95,125 or 625/yg showed a significant IL-
1B increase in a dose-dependent manner. For
CB14, only the 625 fjg dose showed a
significant IL-6 increase. No difference was
observed in the CB95 group. For CB14, only
larger doses showed a significant TNFa
increase. For CB95, no significant differences
were observed.
In BAL fluid: CCL-2 production was
significantly increased for the 625/yg dose in
both the CB14 and CB95 groups. CCL-3
production was significantly increased for the
larger doses in both the CB14 and CB95
groups.
Splenic Lymphocytes: No significant
differences were detected among the CB14
dosages, except for CD8+. No significant
differences were observed among the various
groups for CB95.
Deposition in lymph nodes: For all dosages,
greater deposition of CB14 than CB95 was
observed.
Chemokine mRNA expression in lungs and
lymph nodes: At 125/yg, significant increases
of CLL-3 mRNA expression was observed for
CB14; for CB95, no differences were
detected.
July 2009
D-154
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: CAPs: Concentrated Ambient Particles
Sigaud et al. (Collected from ambient Boston air on
(2007,096100) Teflon filters.)
Species: Mouse HO2
Gender: Male IFNn
Strains: BALB/c S. pneumoniae (ATCC 6303, American
Age' 8-10wks Type Culture Collection, Manassas,
Weight: NR
Particle Size: CAPs: <2.5//m
Route: IFNn priming: aerosol
Particle exposure and infection: Intranasal
Instillation
Dose/Concentration: CAPS or TKk 50//g|50
fjl PBS
S. pneumoniae: 106CFU/25/yl saline
Time to Analysis: Primed for 15min
One time particle exposure 3h post priming with
lung RNA analyzed 3, 6, 24h after exposure
Sacrificed 24h after exposure OR one time
infection
Sacrificed 24h infection
Inflammation: Saline-primed and unprimed
mice exposed to CAPs produced a significant
increase in PMNs in the lung (100% more than
mice exposed to Ti02.) Groups primed with
IFNn then exposed to CAPs produced a strong
inflammatory response, a 2.5 increase in
PMNs when compared to the increase caused
by PBS+ CAPs exposure.
Cytokine Levels: IFNn primed and CAPs
exposed groups
lnflammation+ S. pneumo Infection:
Saline-primed and unprimed mice exposed to
CAPs produced a significant increase in PMNs
in the lung (100% more than mice exposed to
Ti02.) Groups primed with IFNy then exposed
to CAPs produced a strong inflammatory
response, a 2.5 increase in PMNs when
compared to the increase caused by
PBS+CAPs exposure.
Cytokine Levels: IFNy primed and CAPs
exposed groups showed a 1.5-fold increase
over the control.
PMNs: Treatment with CAPs enhanced
inflammation, causing a 2-fold increase in
PMN numbers as compared to the infected
control. IFNy+CAPs+S. pneumo produced a
3.5 fold increase compared to the infected
control and a 1.6-fold increase compared to
PBS + CAPs +S.pneumo. Despite increased
numbers of PMNs in the IFNy+CAPs groups,
the lungs were unable to clear the S. pneumo
infection.
Bacterial Load: Control groups showed
efficient clearance of bacteria after infection.
Unprimed, CAPs-treated, infected groups did
not show a decrease in bacterial numbers.
IFNy+CAPs showed a 2.5-fold increase in
bacterial numbers.
Histopathology: Indicated moderate
pneumonia in PBS+CAPs and severe
pneumonia in IFNy+CAPs. The other groups
did not indicate areas of pneumonia.
Bacterial Uptake AM and PMN Cells: In all
the treated groups, the bacterial content in
AMs showed a decrease, with a more marked
decrease in the IFNy+CAPs group, but these
decreases were not statistically significant.
Groups exposed to CAPs showed a
statistically significant decrease in bacterial
uptake by PMNs.
ROS Levels in AM and PMN Cells:
Intracellular ROS significantly increased in AM
cells in the IFNy+CAPs group, approximately
50% greater than controls. In PMNs, iROS
increased 100% in the IFNy+CAPs groups as
compared to the controls.
July 2009
D-155
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Steerenberg et al.
(2004, 087474)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar
Aqe: 6-8wks
Ozone (positive control)
DEP:SRM1650a (NIST, Gaithersburg,
MD
EHC-93: ambient PM (Ottawa, Canada)
L. mono: Listeria monocytogenes
(strain L242/73 type 4B)
Particle Size: Ozone: DEP, EHC-93:
NR
Route: Ozone: Whole-body inhalation chamber
DEP/EHC-93: intranasal droplet:
Dose/Concentration: Ozone: 2mgfm3
DEP/EHC-93: 50/yg (1.0 mg/ml)
L mono: 0.2 or 0.3 ml (5x100PFU/ml) *l have
emailed author regarding correct dose
Time to Analysis: Ozone 24 h/day for 7 days (¦
7d to-1 dR
DEP/EHC-93: 1/day for 7 days (-7d to-1d)
All rats infected on day 0. Sacrificed on days 3,
4, or 5
Body weight: Growth declined for ozone
exposed group while DEP or EHC-93 groups
grew progressively. Exposure to L. mono
caused all groups to decline in weight.
Bacterial Count in the Lung: The number of
bacteria in the lung of those rats exposed to
ozone was significantly greater than those
exposed to saline. No differences in bacteria
number were found for rats exposed to saline,
EHC-93 or DEP at any time.
Bacterial Count in the Spleen: The ozone
exposed group exhibited statistically
significant increases in bacteria numbers
when compared to the saline-treated group.
No differences in bacteria number were found
for rats exposed to saline, EHC-93 or DEP at
any time. Exposure to ozone decreases the
defense of the respiratory tract against L.
mono infection: however, DEP and EHC-93 did
not appear to affect the host defense system
in regards to clearing/fighting L. mono.
Reference: PM: collected from Rome, Oslo, Lodz,
Steerenberg et al. Amsterdam and De Zilk during the
(2005, 088649) spring, summer and winter.
Species: Mouse Rome, Oslo, Lodz and Amsterdam
Gender- Male represent areas with high population
and dominance of traffic. De Zilk,
Strain: selected as a negative control site, has
BALB/cByJ.ico |ow traffic emissions and natural
Age: 6-8wks allergerns.
EHC-93: used as a positive control (Gift
of Dr. R. Vincent, Ottawa, Canada)
OVA: Ovalbumin (Sigma)
Particle Size: Coarse PM: 2.5-10.0
/jm (MMAD): Fine PM: 0.1 ¦ 2.5/ym
(MMAD): Ultrafine: <0.1 /jm
(MMAD): EHC-93: NR
Route: Intranasal Exposure
OVA challenge: aerosol
Dose/Concentration: PM: 450//g PM (at 0, 3,
or 9 mg/ml)
OVA sensitization: 50 /yg (0.4 mg/ml).
OVA challenge: 20 /yg (0.4 mg/ml)
EHC-93 was administered at
0 - 900/yg to evaluate any dose-response
relationship.
Time to Analysis: Sensitization and PM
exposure on days 0,14
Challenged on days 35, 38, 41 for 20min/day
Sacrificed on day 42
Effects of Coarse and Fine Particles:
Immunoglobulins: 6/13 of the coarse and 9/13
fine PM samples induced an increase in IgE
and IgGlwhen compared to the control. lgG2a
levels were increased in 3/13 of the coarse
and 5/13 of the fine PM. Particles from De
Zilk induced all three immunoglobulins, except
the fine PM did not induce lgG2a. De Zilk was
intended as a negative control (see Table 3).
Analysis among the sites comparing the
subclasses of antibodies indicated a rank as
follows: Lodz > Rome a Oslo.
Histopathology: 9/13 of the coarse PM
samples and 5/13 of the fine PM samples
induced an inflammatory response.
Bronchoalveolar Cells: Lodz (spring/
summer) coarse and fine PM induced a
significant increase in eosinophils, neutrophils
and monocytes. The coarse and fine PM from
Rome (spring) induced an increase in neu-
trophils and the coarse PM induced an
increase in eosinophils. Also both Lodz and
Rome from the coarse PM from the spring
induced an increase in macrophages. Other PM
samples did not have an effect on BAL cell
counts.
Cytokine Production: None of the samples
produced a significant effect on IL-4 levels.
IFNn levels were significantly decreased in
mice exposed to the fine PM fraction (in 8/13
of the samples) when compared to control.
Coarse particle exposure did not appear to
affect IFNn levels. TNFa levels were
significantly increased (in 2 of the 13
samples) when exposed to coarse PM: fine PM
showed similar responses compared to the
OVA only group. IL-5 was significantly
increased in 4/13 of the coarse and fine PM
samples.
Analysis of PM Components: Samples from
Lodz, Oslo and Rome (all spring) were
evaluated and the water-soluble coarse PM
fraction showed increased immunoglobulin and
pathological responses and the water-insoluble
fine PM fraction from Lodz (Spring) showed
increased reactivity. Leukocytes and cytokines
showed no major differences.
July 2009
D-156
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Steerenberg et al.
(2004,087981)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain:
BALB/cByJ.ico
Age: 6-8 wks
Treatment:
1. C.D2-VH6:
Nramp1s and
Nrampl" deficient
2. B6.129P2:
Nos2tmLau: ilMOS
deficient
3. BALB/clL4
(tm2Nnt):
deficient in IL-4
4. BALB/c (wild
type) pretreated
with N-
Acetylcysteine
(NAC)
Coexposure to EHC-93 and ovalbumin
EHC-93: (Gift of Dr. R. Vincent,
Ottawa, Canada)
Particle Size: EHC-93- has a standard
reference size.
Route: Sensitization, Challenge: Intranasal
NAC: IP injection
Dose/Concentration: OVA: 200/yg (0.4 mg/ml)
EHC-93: 150 //g (3 mg/ml)
NAC: 320 mg/kg
Time to Analysis: OVA-only or OVA+EHC-93
sensitization on days 0 and 14.
Some mice received NAC before intranasal
exposure on days 0 and 14
OVA challenge on days 35, 38 and 41
Sacrificed on day 42
Natural-Resistance-Associated
Macrophage Protein 1 (Nrampl): When
exposed to only ovalbumin, Nrampls evoked
less of an antibody responses (IgE, lgG1 and
lgG2a) compared to Nramp1RHowever when
coexposed to OVA and EHC-93, the level of
increased production of antibodies was similar
in both groups. After coexposure, the wild-
type showed increased histopathological
lesions, whereas the macrophage-stimulation-
deficient types showed only a slight increase
(not significant). IL-4, IFN-n, TNF-a and IL-5
levels were similar in wild-type and the
Nrampl strains.
Pretreatment with NAC: lgG2a
concentration was increased further in the
group pretreated with NAC. The wild-type
mice and the NAC pretreated mice showed
similar histopathological lesion patterns. IL-4
levels were similar in wild-type and the NAC
pretreated mice. (IFN-n, TNF-a and IL-5 levels
not reported)
Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase (iNOS):
The wild-type and the iNOS-deficient mice had
similar levels of increased IgE antibody
production. The lgG1 and lgG2a antibody
response was twice as great in the iNOS-
deficient mice compared to the wild type. The
wild-type and the iNOS-deficient mice showed
similar histopathological lesions. No
differences in BAL cells or cytokines were
observed between the wild-type and iNOS-
deficient mice.
IL-4: The IL-4-deficient mice did not produce
an increase in IgE or lgG1 antibodies, as was
seen in the wild-type mice. The lgG2a
antibody response in the IL-4-deficient mice
was similar to the wild type response resulting
in adjuvant activity for the lgG2a antibodies.
Overall the histological response of the wild-
type mice was greater compared to the IL-4
deficient mice. There was no real difference
between the two strains observed in the BAL
cells, except IL-5 was significantly lower in
the IL-4-deficient mice.
July 2009
D-157
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Stevens et al.
(2008,155363)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: BALB/c
Age: 10-12 wks
Weight: 17-20 g
DE: generated using a 30 kW 4-cylinder
Deutz BF4M1008 diesel engine
connected to a 22.3 kW Saylor Bell air
compressor. The engine was operated
on diesel fuel purchased from a service
station in Research Triangle Park, NC.
The engine was operated at a steady-
state, approx. 20% of engine's full
load.
High composition:
O2: 4.3 ± 0.07 ppm
NO: 9.2 ± 0.30 ppm
NO2: 1.1 ± 0.05 ppm
SO2: 0.2 ± 0.10 ppm
Low composition:
O2.NO, NO7 SO7 below detection limits
Particle Size: NR
Route: Whole-body Inhalation Chambers
(flow rate - 142 L/min)
OVA immunization and challenge: intranasal
Dose/Concentration: High - 2000//gfnrl
Low - 500/yg/m3
Time to Analysis: DE exposure for 4hfd on days
0-4.
OVA immunization 40min after DE exposure on
days 0-2
Challenged on days 18 and 28.
Sacrificed 4h after last exposure of day 4 for
gene set analysis or 18,48, or 96h after the last
challenge
IgE Antibody Production: In the absence
OVA, IgE antibodies were not detected. 18, 48
and 96 hours following OVA, mice exposed to
low and high doses of DE had an increase in
antibodies over time. Mice exposed to high
dose had an increase (non-significant) to the
OVA exposed control at the 48 h time mark
BAL Cell Counts: Cell counts at 18 and 96
hours after OVA treatment did not differ
among treatment groups. At 48 hours the
number of eosinophils, neutrophils and
lymphocytes were significantly increased in
mice exposed to both high and low
concentrations of DE. With DE exposure alone,
only neutrophils were statistically increased in
the high DE concentration. This indicates the
combination exposure of DE and an antigen is
essential to promote the development of
allergic lung disease.
BAL Cytokine Production: IL-6 production
showed a dose-dependent and time-dependent
increase, but was significantly increase in the
high dose group at 96h. The high dose group
saw a non significant increase in IL-10 levels
over time. The greatest increase in IL-10 for
the low dose group occurredl8 hours after
OVA stimulation.
Pulmonary Inflammation and Lung Injury:
No differences among the groups were
observed for macrophage, lymphocyte,
neutrophil and eosinophil counts. Protein and
LDH levels were not found to be increased in
the BALF of any group.
Gene Set Analysis: Pair wise comparisons
revealed significant gene set difference
between the high DE and control groups.
Comparison of the high DE/OVA versus
air/OVA showed significant changes in 23
gene sets, including genes involved in
oxidative stress responses. The high DE/saline
versus the air/saline showed significantly
altered pathways. Altered pathways include
those for cell adhesion, cell cycle control,
apoptosis, growth and differentiation, and
cytokine signaling. The results show that
relatively short exposures to DE cause mild
increases in immunologic sensitization to
en.
July 2009
D-158
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Takizawa et al.
(2003,157039)
Species: Human
Cell Lines:
Normal Small
Airway Epithelial
Cells and
Bronchial
Epithelial Cells
(BET-1A)
Suspended DEP: collected using a
2,300-cc Isuzu diesel engine using
standard diesel fuel at 1,050 rpm
under a load of 6 torque.
DE exposure in vitro (air explosure):
collected using a 2,300 ml Isuzu diesel
engine at 1,050 rpm.
Composition:
Fine particles: 1 mg/m3
CO: 10.6ppm
NO2: 7.3ppm
SO2: 3.3ppm
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: Suspended DEP: varying
doses from 0-50 /yglml
IL-13: varying doses from 0-25 ng/ml
DE exposure in vitro (air exposure): 100/yg/m3
Time to Analysis: Cells were exposed to varying
concentrations of suspended DEP for up to 24h.
NF-kB: analyzed at 6h after suspended DEP
exposure
Air exposure at 0, 2,4, 8 or 14h
Preliminary experiments indicated that DEP at
0.1-50 /yglmL had no significant cytotoxicity
to BET-1A cells and human bronchial epithelial
cells (as analyzed by LDH levels).
Eotaxin Production: (Eotaxin is a cc
chemokine that plays a role in eosinophil
accumulation in a variety of allergic disorders)
Epithelial and BET -1A cells treated with
suspended DEP or IL- showed a dose-
dependent stimulatory effect on eotaxin
release or production. Simultaneous exposure
to 25ngfmL IL-13 and DEPdepicted an additive
effect for both cell types.
Eotaxin mRNA: At 25 //gfmL, suspended DEP
showed a time-dependent effect on eotaxin
mRNA levels up to 12 h in both cell types.
Extracted RNA from human bronchial epithelial
cells exposed to varying doses of DEP showed
a dose-dependent effect for both cell types (up
to 25 /yglmL DEP) on eotaxin mRNA levels
after 12h of exposure. IL-13 also induced a
dose-dependent increase on eotaxin mRNA
levels in cells in both cell types. Combination
of IL-13 and DEP showed an additive effect on
mRNA levels in BET-1 A cells. DE exposure in
vitro also showed a time-dependent
stimulatory effect on eotaxin production in
BET-1 A cells.
NF-DB ISTAT6 Activation: (it has been
suggested that NF-nB plays a role in the
transcriptional regulation of eotaxin gene
expression) Cells exposed to 1-25/yglmL DEP
for 6 h increased NF-nB. BET-1A cells treated
with suspended DEP failed to activate STAT6
Effect of NAC and PDTC on Eotaxin mRNA
Levels: (NAC and PDTC are antioxidant
reagents with inhibitory effects on NF-nB
activation) in BET-1 A, both NAC and PDTC
showed a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on
DEP-induced eotaxin production. Both
reagents also blocked DEP-induced eotaxin
mRNA levels in BET -1A cells. NAC and PDTC
did not suppress eotaxin production or eotaxin
mRNA levels in IL-13 stimulated BET -1A cells.
In addition pre-treatment with NAC
attenuated NF-nB activation induced by DEP
but had no effect on STAT6 induction by IL-
13.
These findings suggest that DEP stimulated
eotaxin gene expression via NF-kB dependent,
but STAT6-independent, pathways.
July 2009
D-159
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Tesfaigzi et al.
(2005,156116)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Brown-
Norway
Aqe: 6wks
PM: Wood smoke generated from a
conventional wood stove that has a
0.5m3 firebox and a sliding gate air
intake damper. The stove was
operated over a 3-phase burn cycle
that spanned 6 h. Fire was started
(initiated exposure) with unprinted I
unbleached newspaper and a mix of
black and white oak.
Wood smoke components: organic
material, small amounts of elemental
carbon and metals and associated
analytes.
Particle Size: 0.36 /jm (MMAD)
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: PM: 1000//gfm:l
Time to Analysis: Exposed to wood smoke or
filtered air 6hfday for 70 consecutive days
OVA IP injection immunization on days 2, 9
OVA aerosol exposure 2h/day on days 67-70
following daily exposure to wood smoke or
filtered air
Sacrificed day 70
Body Weight and Respiratory Function: No
difference in clinical signs or body weight was
observed when comparing the two rat groups.
The woodsmoke exposed group had a 45%
lower dynamic lung compliance when
compared to those exposed to the filtered air
groupbefore the methacholine challenge. Chal-
lenging the rats with methacholine caused a
decrease in dynamic lung compliance in both
groups, but the decrease was greater in the
air-exposed group. At the highest dose of
methacholine, the dynamic lung compliance in
controls was similar to the baseline value of
the smoke-exposed group. No significant
differences in total pulmonary resistance were
observed. Wood smoke exposed rats had a
10% increase in functional residual capacity
than the air-exposed group.
BAL Cell Counts and Cytokines: There was
no difference in lymphocyte, eosinophil or
neutrophils in the BALF of either group. There
was an increase, though not statistically
significant, in macrophages the wood smoke
exposed group when compared to the filtered
air group. In the BALF, IFN-n and and IL-1B
levels were significantly decreased, IL-4 and
GRO-d levels were increased in rats exposed
to wood smoke compared to filtered air.
Serum IgE levels experienced a reduction trend
in the wood smoke group, but it did not reach
significance. Both groups showed mild signs
of inflammation. The average eosinophils
present in stained tissue was 21% higher in
the wood smoke exposed group compared to
the air exposed.
Reference:
Tomita et al.
(2006,097827)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain:
C57BL/6J; AHR-
deficient;
mEH-deficient;
ARNT floxed (loxP
sequences
inserted in Arnt
gene);
T cell-specific
ARNT-deficient
Age: 7wks
Weight: 20g
DEP: two independent preparations
fractionated into 13 different fractions
based on acidic and basic functionality
(one from light-duty, 4-cylinder diesel
engine using standard diesel fueld from
Dr. Kei Miwa and other generated from
A4JB-type, Isuzu automobile, Japan)
Individual PAH tested (Osaka, Japan):
BbF - benzo[b]fIuoranthene
BeP - Benzo[e]pyrene
IDP - lndeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
BpPe - Benzo[ghi]perylene
BaP - Benzo[a]pyrene
BkF - Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Per - Perylene
DBA - Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene
Particle Size: NR
Route: Intraperitoneal Injection
Dose/Concentration: DEP, fractionated DEP or
PAH compounds: 0.5/yg ¦ 10 mg/kg bw in 50 ul
of olive oil
Time to Analysis: Single exposure, sacrificed 3d
post exposure.
Effect on thymus: DEP treatment (10 mg/kg
of body weight) caused severe atrophy of the
thymus while the spleen and lymph nodes
appeared normal. Three days following DEP
treatment showed a marked reduction in
thymus size. The total number of thymocytes
was reduced by more than 70% mostly due to
a massive reduction in DP cells (CD4+CD8+).
DEP induced no significant alterations in the
cell numbers of CD4/CD8 ratios in the spleen
and lymph nodes.
DEP Extracts: Only the WAC (carbonic acid
fraction) and BE (weak basic fraction) did not
produce a significant reduction in thymocyte
numbers in vivo. Among the active fractions, 7
produced a marked selective loss of immature
DP thymocytes, similar to the crude extract of
DEP.
PAH effects: Thymic involution was severely
induced by the N and various other fractions.
7 out of the 8 PAH compounds were
significantly effective in decreasing the
number of thymocytes upon in vivo exposure.
Only BpPe did not have an effect.
AHR/ARNT and mEH deficient mice (BaP
and DEP only): In the absence of AHR, BaP
treatment did not result in a loss of
thymocytes. Like DEP, BaP produced severe
thymic involution in mEH-deficient mice. DEP-
mediated thymic involution was significantly
enhanced in mEH-deficient mice.
July 2009
D-160
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Verstraelen et al.
(2005, 096872)
Species: Human
Tissue/Cell
Types: Monocyte-
derived dendritic
cells (Mo-DC)
Cord blood
samples of seven
women were
collected from
umbilical vessels
of placentas of
normal, full-term
infants.
DEP- SRM 2975
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: DEP in varying
concentrations: 0.2, 2, 20, 200, 2000 ng/mL
LPS 100 ng/mL
Time to Analysis: Cells were incubated for 24h
and analyzed via flow cytometry.
Biological Markers: Exposure to DEP alone
did not alter expression levels of HLA-DR,
CD86 or CD83.
Treatment with LPS alone caused a non-
significant increase in all three markers when
compared to the control.
Treatment with DEP+LPS caused a
significant increase in the expression of CD83
and a non-significant increased expression of
HLA DR and CD86. DEP+ LPS induced a bell-
shape dose-response curve on the expression
of all three markers, with a dose of 20 ngfmL
DEP + 100 ng/mL LPS causing the largest
increase in upregulation.
When only the results of the LPS-responsive
donors (5 out of 7 blood cord samples) were
included, the effects described above become
more pronounced.
Reference:
Walczak-
Drzewiecka et al.
(2003, 096784)
Species: Mouse
Cell Line:
C1.MC/C57.1
(C57) Mast Cells
Metal and Transition Metal Ions: Sr2
Ni2+, Cd2+, Al3+, Pb2+
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell culture,
Dose/Concentration: 0.1-5/ymol
Time to Analysis: 10min - 4h incubation before
analysis
BHex Mediator Release in Mast Cells:
Incubation with SrCb, NiS04, CdCl2 or AlCh
resulted in a 2-5% release of B-hexoaminidase
in mast cells. Incubation with a mixture of all
these compounds induced a greater (11%)
release in B-hexoaminidase, indicating there
might be a additive effect.
Cell Viability: Incubation of cells at
concentrations and incubation time employed
did not result in decrease in cell viability.
Antigen-Mediated Mediator Release in
Mast Cells: Al3+ and Ni2+ enhanced antigen-
mediated release. 10-7 MAICh released 23%
of B-hexoaminidase compared to antigen
alone, which induced 11 % release of B-
hexoaminidase. Cd2+, Sr2+ and Pb2+ enhanced
antigen-mediated release to a lesser extent.
Ni2+, Al3+, Sr2+ and Cd2+ depicted a dose-
dependent relationship with antigen-mediated
B-hexoaminidase release.
Antigen-Induced Protein Phosphorylation:
Addition of the antigen induced the
anticipated phosphorylation of multiple
proteins in C57 mast cells The presence of
Ni2+ and Pb2+ mediated an increase in
phosphorylation of several of the proteins and
Al3+ mediated a decrease in phosphorylation
of multiple proteins (specifically the 56 and 37
kD bands).
Antigen-Mediated Cytokine Secretion (IL-
4): At certain concentrations all tested metal
and transition metal ions were able to induce
IL-4 secretion or enhance antigen-induced IL-4
secretion in mast cells, but no dose-dependent
relationship was established.
Reference: Wan
and Yu (2006,
157104)
Species: Human
Cell Lines:
Human, B cell
lymphocytes
PMBC
(>98.5% B cells-
CD19+CD20+;
<1 % Tcells
(CD3+))
Human
lymphocyte cell
lines - DG75
NQ01 wild type
DEP from 4 cyl Isuzu diesel methanol
extracts (Previously published)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture, PMBC - 1 x 106 cell
DG 75 - 3 x 10® cells
IgEPMBC 1 x 106/mL
B-cells 0.5x10e|mL
Dose /Concentration: 2.5, 5,10, 20 /yg DEPX/
plate (text refers to 20 /yg/mL)
IgEDEPX 100 ng/mL
sulfurophane at 0 - 30 /ymol
Time to Analysis: 6h mRNA; 16 h protein
assay. IgE 14d.
Induction of NQ01 by DEPX: In PBMCs and
DG75DEPX dose-dependently inudced NQ01
mRNA expression NQ01 ARE was increased
NAC inhibited NQ01 gene expressiondose
dependently. p38 MAPK and P13K inhibition
partially blocked NQ01 mRNA and ARE
induction by DEPX.
Induction of phase II enzymes: DEPX
induced IgE potentiation was reduced dose
dependently by induced phase II enzymes.
July 2009
D-161
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Whitekus et al.
(2002,157142)
Species: Mouse
Cell Line: RAW
264.7
DEP (light-duty, four-cylinder engine-
4JB1 type, Isuzu Automobile, Japan;
standard diesel fuel) (extracts)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 50//g/mL
Time to Analysis: DEP extracts suspended in
methanol and sonicated 20min. Centrifuged
10min. Dried DEP resuspended and stored -20°C.
Cell cultures maintained 37 °C. Exposed to
antioxidants 5h. HO-1 western blot,
determination of cellular GSH:GSSG ratios,
carbonyl protein content, lipid hydroperoxides
performed.
DEP significantly reduced the GSH:GSSG
ratio. This effect was prevented by adding
thiol antioxidants NAC or BUC. DEP increased
lipid peroxide levels, but the addition of all
antioxidants decreased these levels. DEP
increased carbonyl groups. NAC, BUC, and
luteolin reduced HO-1 expression.
Reference:
Whitekus et al.
(2002,157142)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: BALB/c
Age: 6-8wks
Weight: NR
DEP (light-duty, four-cylinder engine-
4JB1 type, Isuzu Automobile, Japan;
standard diesel fuel) (extracts)
Particle Size: 0.5-4//m
Route: Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 200, 600, 2000//g/m3
Time to Analysis: Exposed 1 h/d 10d. Animals
receiving OVA had 20min OVA exposure after
DEP exposure.
DEP+OVA dose-dependency increased IgE and
IgG 1, being more effective than the OVA-alone
treatment. This effect was significantly
suppressed by thiol antioxidants NAC or BUC.
DEP+OVA increased carbonyl protein and lipid
peroxide over OVA. NAC or BUC suppressed
lipid peroxide and protein oxidation. No general
markers for inflammation were observed.
Reference:
Witten et al.
(2005, 087485)
Species: Rat
Gender: Female
Strain: F344
Age: 8wks
Weight: — 175g
DEP (heavy-duty Cummins N14
research engine operated at 75%
throttle)
Particle Size: 7.234-294.27nm
Route: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: Low- 35.3±4.9//g/m3,
High- 632.9±47.61 //g/m3
Time to Analysis: Exposed 4hfd, 5dfwk, 3wks.
Pretreated with saline or capsaicin.
There were no differences for substance P.
The low-exposure group had significantly less
NK1. DEP reduced NEP activity. Plasma
extraversion dose-dependently increased and
was greatest in capsaicin animals. Respiratory
permeability dose-dependently increased. IL-
1B was significantly higher for the low-
exposure group. IL-12 was significantly lower
in the capsaicin high-expsoure group. TNF-a
increased in the high-exposure group and
capsaicin low-exposure group. High exposure
induced particle-laden AMs in the lungs,
perivascular cuffing consisting of mononuclear
cells, alveolar edema and increased mast cell
number. Neutrophil and eosinophil influx was
not seen.
Reference: Wong DEP (Cummins N14 research engine at Route: Nose-only Inhalation
et al. (2003,
097707)
Species: Rat
Gender: Female
Strain: F344/NH
Age: ~4wks
Weight: — 175g
75% throttle) (EC- 34.93-601.67
//g/m3, 0C- 1.90-11.25 //g/m3.
Sulfates 0.94-17.96 //g/m3, Na- 4.07-
4.78 ng/m3, Mg- 0.60-0.86 ng/m3, Ca-
5.05-10.66 ng/m3, Fe-3.17-6.44, Cr-
0.68-1.31 ng/m3, Mn- 0.11-0.22 ng/m3,
Pb- 0.97-1.24 ng/m3)
Particle Size: 7.5-294.3nm
Dose/Concentration: Low- 35.3±4.9//g/m3,
High- 669.3±47.6//g/m3
Time to Analysis: Exposed 4h/d, 5d/wk, 3wks.
Pretreated with saline or capsaicin.
DEP dose-dependently increased plasma
extraversion, which was further increased by
capsaicin. In the high-exposure group, particle-
laden AMs (which were reduced by capsaicin),
inflammatory cell margination, perivascular
cuffing with subsequent mononuclear cell
migration and dispersal, increased mast cells,
and decreased substance P were all seen. NK-
1R was downregulated in the low-exposure
group and upregulated in the capsaicin-
pretreated high-exposure group. NEP
decreased significantly for both groups.
July 2009
D-162
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Washed DEP (carbonaceous core), DEP-
Yanagisawa et al. OCfextracted organic chemicals) and
(2006, 096458) Whole DEP
Species: Mouse Particles collected from: 4JB1-Type,
Gender' Male four-cylinder, 2.74 L, Isuzu diesel
engine, while operated on standard
Strain: ICR diesel fue| at 200g under a load of 10
Age: 5wks torques.
Weight: 25-28g Particle Size: MMAD- 0.4/ym
Route: IT Administration
Dose/Concentration: 50/yg/0.1L
Time to Analysis: 1. Control- 0.1mL PBS
2. DEP-0C- 50 /yg
3. Washed DEP-50ug
4. Whole DEP- 50ug DEP-OC + 50ug Washed
DEP5. OVA-1 /yg -
6. DEP-OC- 1 /yg + OVA
7. Washed DEP- 50/yg + OVA 8. Whole DEP- 50
/yg DEP-OC + 50/yg Washed DEP + OVA
All groups received OVA or PBS every 2 wks for
6 wks and the PM component or PBS once a
week for 6 wks.
BAL Analysis: DEP-OC + OVA caused a
significant increase in PMN infiltration in the
BAL compared to the control Exposure to
Whole DEP+ OVA caused PMN count to rise
further
Macrophages: OVA alone DEP-OC +0VA,
Washed DEP + OVA and Whole DEP + OVAall
caused a significant increase in macrophages
compared to the control.
Lung Histology: Exposure to OVA, Washed
DEP, DEP-OC and Whole DEP caused a slight
increase in PMNs, mononuclear cells and
goblet cell proliferation. Treatment with all
three DEP groups + OVA caused a significant
increase in mononuclear cells, PMNs and
goblet cell proliferation. Whole DEP + OVA
had the greatest impact.
Thl and Th2 Cytokine Expression: Washed
DEP+OVA caused a significant increase in
IFN-n compared to control, whereas Whole
DEP+OVA caused a significant decrease
compared to control. No significant
differences in IL-2 and IL-4 levels were seen
among groups. DEP-OC + OVA and Whole
DEP+ OVA caused significant increases in IL-5
compared to control and compared to OVA
Whole DEP+OVA caused significant increase
in IL-13 compared to control
Eotaxin and MIP-1a Expression: OVA
increased eotaxin levels and DEP-OC + OVA
caused a more significant increase in eotaxin.
Whole DEP alone caused a significant increase
in MIP-1a and Whole DEP+OVA caused an
even greater increase in MIP-1a.
IgG 1 Levels: Exposure to DEP-OC+OVA
caused an increase in IgG 1 and exposure to
Whole DEP+OVA caused greater elevation in
lgG1 levels.
Reference: Yang DEP-SRM 1650
Particle Size: MMAD- 0.5mm
087886)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: B6C3F1
Age: 6-8wks
Exposure on Spleen IgM AFC: DEP exposure
for 2-weeks induced a dose-dependent
decrease in spleen AFC in response to sRBC
immunization. Mice exposed to 15 /yg/kg
depicted a 35% reduction in total spleen
activity. In the group exposed to DEP for 4
weeks, the decrease in AFC was not
significantly different than the control.
DEP Exposure on Spleen Cell
Number/Lymphocyte Counts: Exposure for 2
or 4 weeks did not affect total number of
nucleated splenocytes. DEP caused a 30%
reduction in total T cells. The number of B
cells were not significantly affected.
DEP Exposure on Spleen T-Cell Function:
(evaluated in 2 week exposure group only)
DEP induced a dose-dependent decrease in
spleen cell proliferation to ConA. DEP did not
affect spleen cell proliferation in response to
anti-CD3 mAb. Production of IL-2 in response
to ConA was reduced in a dose-dependent
manner by DEP exposure. IFN-n production
was decreased by exposure to DEP. IL-4
production was not measuredable.
Route: IT Aspiration
Dose/Concentration: 1, 5, or 15 mg DEP/kg
body weight
Time to Analysis: Mice exposed to 1, 5, or 15
mg DEP/kg of body weight for either 3 times in 2
wks or 6 times in 4 wks.
Toxicity of DEP Exposure: DEP did not have
a significant effect on body, liver or spleen
weight. The highest dose of DEP caused an
increase in lung weight and lung weight
relative to body weight. None of the
hematological parameters were significantly
different in the mice exposed for 2wks; in the
4 wk group there was a significant decrease
in platelet counts in mice exposed to 15mgfkg.
DEP
July 2009
D-163
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Yin et DEP - SRM 2975 (NIST)
al. (2005, Listeria
MM) Partjc|e Sjze. NR
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Brown-
Norway
(BNfCrlBR)
Age: NR
Weight: 200-
250g
Route: Nose-only inhalation (DEP), NT instillation
tListeria)
Dose/Concentration: 100,000 CFU (Listeria);
21.2 + 2.3 mg/m3 (DEP)
Time to Analysis: DEP exposure for 4 h/d for
5d; infection with Listeria 7d postexposure;
sacrifice 3 and 7d postinfection
Lung deposit: Estimated mean lung deposit of
DEP - 406 + 29//g/rat DEP prolonged
growth of bacteria in lung
Alveolar Macrophage (AM) response: DEP
significantly inhibited Listeria-'mAuwA IL-1B
secretion at d7 and TNF-a snf IL-12 at both
d3 and d7. IL-10 production was enhanced at
d7.
T-Lymphocyte response: DEP significantly
reduced the development of T cells in
response to Listeria infection. These
lymphocytes displayed increased production of
IL-6 at d7, but significantly diminished levels
of IL-10, IL-2 and IFN-n.
Reference: Yin et
al. (2004,
097685)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Brown-
Norway
(BN/CrlBR)
Age: NR
Weight: 200-
250g
DEP - SRM 2975 (NIST)
Listeria
Particle Size: NR
Route: Inhalation Exposure (DEP)
IT instillation (Listeria)
Dose/Concentration: 20.62 + 1.31 mgfm3
(DEP).
100,000 CFU Listeria
Time to Analysis: DEP exposure for 4 h/d for
5d; inoculation with bacteria 2h postexposure;
sacrifice 3, 7,10d postinfection
Lung deposit: Estimated mean lung deposit of
DEP - 389 + 25 //g/rat
Pulmonary responses and bacterial
clearance: DEP significantly augmented
Z/£fe/7d-induced neutrophil infiltration, lung
CFU and recoverable alveolar macrophages
(AM) at all times post-infection. LDH activity
was increased 3d post-infection. Bacterial
count in DEP exposed rats remained
significantly higher through d7.
Cytokine production by AM: DEP exposure
significantly lowered Z/ife/73-induced
production of IL-1 B, TNF-a and IL-12.
Production of IL-10 was strongly augmented.
T-lymphocyte responses: DEP moderately
but not significantly lowered the total number
of lymphocytes, CD4+ cells and lymphocyte
IL-10 production. Listeria-induced T-cell
development was strongly inhibited, as were
the development of CD8+ cells, IL-12
production and IFN-n secretion. DEP and
Listeria exposure showed and increased
production of IL-6 at d3 and d7 post-exposure.
Reference: Yin et
al.
2007
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Brown-
Norway
(BN/CrlBR)
Age: NR
Weight: 225-
250g
DEP - SRM 2975
eDEP - organic DEP extract
wDEP - washed DEP
CB - carbon black
Particle Size: DEP: median diameter-
19.4 fjm, surface area- 91 fj2\g; CB:
0.1-0.6 /jm
Route: IT Instillation of Listeria.
Treatment after AM cell isolation
Dose/Concentration: DEP: 10, 50,100//gfmL;
CB: 50/yglmL
Time to Analysis: Sacrifice postinfection or no
infection. AM isolated. DEP or CB treatments for
1,4,16, 24h.
AM Phagocytosis: None of the DEP or CB
treatments were cytotoxic or affected the
number of adherent cells. 10-100 /yglmL. DEP
significantly decreased AM phagocytosis in a
concentration- and time-dependent manner,
with increased concentration and time
decreasing activity.
Bacterial Activity: The inhibition of AM
bactericidal activity by DEP was time- and
concentration-dependent. eDEP and wDEP
inhibitied the AM bactericidal activity but
were less effective than DEP. The CB
treatment was not significant.
Cytokine Secretion by AM: DEP and eDEP
concentration-dependently decreased TNF-a,
IL-1 B and IL-12, but increased IL-10. wDEP
and CB did not show a significant effect.
Cytokine Secretion by Lymphocytes: DEP
and eDEP concentration-dependently
decreased IL-2 and IFN-n. wDEP and CB had
little effect, except high concentrations of
wDEP decreased IFN-n.
July 2009
D-164
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Yin et
al. (2004,
087983)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Brown-
Norway
(BNfCrlBR)
Age: NR
Weight: 225-
250g
DEP - SRM2975
eDEP - organic DEP extract
wDEP - washed DEP
CB - carbon black
Particle Size: DEP- NR,
CB- 0.1-0.6/jm
Route: IT Instillation of Listeria.
Treatment after AM cell isolation
Dose/Concentration: 50//gjmL (DEP or CB)
Time to Analysis: Killed 7d post instillation. AM
isolated then incubated. DEP treatments for up to
24h at 37 degrees.
DEP-induced ROS production: R0S was
induced by DEP or eDEP and inhibited by eDEP
with ANF or NAC. eDEP induction of ROS was
time-dependent. wDEP or CB did not induce
ROS.
DEP-induced HO-1 expression: DEP- or
eDEP-induced H0-1 expression was inhibited
by ANF, NAC or SB203580. wDEP or CB did
not induce ROS. DEP or eDEP exposure
resulted in a 2.5- to 3-fold induction of H0-1
expression in uninfected AM.
eDEP-modulated cytokine production:
eDEP exposure resulted in a time-dependent
increase in LPS-stimulated IL-10 orTNF-a
production, and both were inhibitied by ANF or
NAC. wDEP did not affect either. SOD
pretreatment attenuated eDEP-upregulated
H0-1 expression, inhibited IL-10, and reversed
eDEP inhibition of IL-12. Znpp decreased IL-
10.
Reference: Yin et
al.
(2003,096127)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Brown-
Norway
(BN/CrlBR)
Age: NR
Weight: 200-
250g
DEP - SRM 1650a
L. monocytogenes
Particle Size: NR
Route: Nose-only Inhalation (DEP).
IT Instillation (Listeria)
Dose/Concentration: 50 or 100 mgfm3 (DEP);
100,000 bacteria per 500uL sterile saline
(Listeria)
Time to Analysis: DEP exposure for 4h.
Bacterial inoculation. Sacrificed 3, 7d
postexposure.
Lymphocyte population: DEP-alone exposure
increased total lymphocytes, T cells and T-cell
subsets. Elevated cell counts in the combined
exposure were DEP dose-dependent, with the
100 mgfm3 treatment having significant
increases in the cell number and CD8+/CD4+
ratio.
IL-2: DEP exposure in noninfected rats at both
doses increased IL-2 in the 24h culture and
decreased IL-2 in the 48h culture. The
increase in IL-2 at 3 days postinfection was
not significant. DEP exposure increased IL-
2Ra in response to ConA stimulation. DEP-
treated infected rats had increases in ConA-
inducible CD4+|IL-2Ra+ and CD8+/ IL-2Ra+.
IL-6: IL-6 production was dose-dependent in
DEP-treated uninfected rats and infected rats.
The combined exposure produced less IL-6
than the DEP-alone or Listeria a\one
treatments.
IFN-D: DEP decreased IFN-n at 3 days
postexposure, but increased at 7 days
postexposure in a dose-dependent manner.
Uninfected DEP-treated rats did not
substantially respond to HKLM. HKLM-induced
IFN-n production is strongly inhibited at all
tested DEP doses.
Reference:
Zelikoff et al.
(2003, 039009)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Fischer
344
Age: 7-8mo
Weight: NR
CAPS - concentrated ambient PM2.6
from New York City
S.pneumoniae
Particle Size: MMAD- 0.4//m
Route: Nose-only Inhalation (CAPS)
IT Instillation [S.pneumoniae)
Dose/Concentration: CAPS: Study 1- 60-600
^g/rn3,
Mean- 345 /yg/m3;
Study 2- 65-150 //g/m3,
Mean-107 /yglm3;
[S.pneumoniae 2-4 x 107)
Time to Analysis: Study 1: Uninfected rats
exposed to air or CAPS for 3h. Sacrificed 3, 24,
or 72h postexposure or IT instilled 4, 24, 72,
120h and sacrificed 4, 24, 72h postinfection
Study 2: Infection with bacteria. Exposed 48h
later to CAPS or filtered air for 5h. Sacrifice 9,
18, 24, 72,120h postexposure.
Study 1: CAPS did not effect cell numbers,
viability, profiles, lavageable LDH activity,
total protein, or total circulating WBC counts.
Exposure to CAPs prior to infection
significantly increased PMN and decreased
lymphocytes. WBC levels returned to contol
levels by 4h postinfection. CAPS had no effect
on circulating monocyte values. CAPS
significantly increased bacterial burdens at
24h, but thereafter the burden decreased to
below control levels.
Study 2: In CAPS exposed rats, PMN
decreased, Pam increased, and the cytokines
TNF-a, IL-1 B and IL-6 decreased.
Lymphocytes and monocytes were unaffected.
Bacterial burdens in CAP-exposed rats were
about 10% greater than air contols at 9h and
> 300% greater at 18h. CAPS significantly
increased the percent of affected lung area
and severity of infection.
July 2009
D-165
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Zelikoff et al.
(2002,037797)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Fischer
344
Age: 7-9m
Weight: NR
Ambient NYC PM
Single transition metals of Fe, Mn, Ni
Streptococcus pneumoniae
Particle Size: NYC PM: PM21,
Fe2+, Mn2+, Ni2+: 0.4//m (MMAD)
Route: NYC PM, single transition metals: Nose-
only inhalation
S. pneumoniae: IT instillation
Dose/Concentration: 15-20 x 106
[S.pneumoniae)-, Single metals/NYC PM: 65-
90/yg/m3
Time to Analysis: Infection/no infection
followed by 5h exposure to NYC PM or single
transition metal. Sacrifice 4, 5, 9,18, 24, and
120h after exposure
CAPs exposure to infected rats significantly
increased pulmonary bacterial burdens of S.
pneumo in a time-dependent manner. At 9h,
18h, 24h, and 5d after CAPs exposure,
bacterial burdens were 10%, 300%, 70% and
30% above controls. Uninfected rats exposed
to the single transition metals showed
significant alterations in PMNs and
lymphocytes values at 1h postexposure.
Exposure to Fe of uninfected rats significantly
increased superoxide anion production by
pulmonary macrophages. Uninfected rats
exposed to inhaled Fe significantly reduced B-
lymphocyte proliferation at 48 h, but did not
affect T-lymphocyte production. Inhaled Ni,
for the uninfected, significantly decreased T-
lymphocyte production at 18h, and did not
affect B-lymphocyte production. Inhalation of
Fe by infected rats facilitated an increase in
bacterial numbers while Ni inhibited bacterial
clearance. Inhaled Fe by infected also
significantly decreased PMNs and lymphocyte
numbers by 35% and increased pulmonary
macrophage numbers by 29% when compared
to the air exposed group. Results
demonstrated that inhalation of Fe altered
innate and adaptive immunity in uninfected
hosts, and both Fe and Ni reduced pulmonary
bacterial clearance in previously infected rats.
Reference: Zhong
et al. (2006,
093264)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: BALB/c
Age: 6-8wks
Weight: NR
Cell Line:
J774A.1
CAPs: Concentrated Air Particles
(Boston, MA)
Urban air particles (UAP) SRM1649
(Washington, DC)
Titanium Oxide (Ti02> (Baker
Chemicals, Phillipsburg, NJ)
Carbon Black (CB) (Sigma, St. Louis,
MO)
Particle Size: UAP - NR;
Ti02/CB - NR; CAPs: nPM?.!,
Streptococcus pneumoniae: strain
ATCC6303
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: NR, 100//gfmL
Time to Analysis: Pre-treated CAPs cells
exposed to CAPs for 1h.
All cells, IFNy-primed AMs, unprimed AMs, and
J774A.1, exposed to bacteria for 1h.
Binding measured 15h after bacteria exposure.
Ingestion measured 2h after bacteria exposure.
Rate and number of killed bacteria measured 2h
after bacteria exposure.
Binding, internalization and killing of
bacteria: CAPS significantly increased binding
of bacteria by IFNy-primed AMs, normal AMs
and J774A.1. CAPS decreased internalization
and absolute number of bacteria killed by
macrophages of all types. The rate of killing of
internalized bacteria was similar in the
presence or absence of CAPs; however, CAPs
did cause a decrease in the absolute number
of bacteria killed by all three types of
macrophages, due to the decrease in
internalization.
Effects of other particles: Ti02 and CB had
no effect on J774 binding or internalization of
S. pneumo Ti02 and CB's effects on primed
and unprimed AMs were not reported. Testing
with UAPs, however, showed effects similar
to those observed with CAPs.
Soluble components: The soluble fraction of
CAPs, especially iron, is responsible for
decreased internalization.
July 2009
D-166
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table D-5. Effects of the central nervous system.
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Results
Reference:
Calderon-
Garciduehas et
al. (2003,
156316)
Species: Dog
Gender: Male,
Female
Strain: Mixed
breed
Age: 7d-1 Oyrs
Weight:
349 ± 116g -
20kg
Urban Air (Mexico City-high PM
region, Tlaxcala- low PM region)
(PM, Pb, volatile organic
compounds, formaldehyde,
acetaldehyde, mutagenic PM,
alkane hydrocarbons, Ni, V, Mn,
Cr, peroxyacetyl NO42', LPS,
endotoxins)
Particle Size: PM: 2.5,10 /jm
Route: Ambient Air Exposure
Dose/Concentration: Mexico City: PM10:
78 /yglm3, PM2.6: 21.6 //gfm3, Pb in TSP:
< 0.4/yg/m3
Time to Analysis: Dogs raised in house or
outdoor-indoor kennel. Lifetime exposure.
Mexico City dogs had significantly greater apurinic and
apyrimidic sites in the olfactory bulb and hippocampus.
Histopathological changes in the respiratory and olfactory
epithelium were greatest in Mexico City dogs. Mexico City
dogs also had greater immunoreactivity than the controls
for NFnB, ilMOS, cyclooxygenase-2, glial fibrillatory acidic
protein, ApoE, amyloid precursor product and B-amyloid.
Reference: CAPs from Los Angeles, lacking
Campbell et al. reactive organic and H20 soluble
(2005, 087217) gases, O3, NOx, SOx
Species: Mouse Particle Size: F+UF: <2.5//m;
Strain: BALB/c UF: < 0.18//m
Age: 7wks
Route: Whole-body Exposure
Mice were challenged with OVA prior to exposure and 1
Dose/Concentration: 20-fold concentration and 2 weeks following exposure, and then brains were
of near highway ambient air, avg UF
concentration: 282.5//g|m3, avg F
concentration: 441.7 /yglm3
Time to Analysis: 4hfd, 5dfwk for 2wks
assayed. F+UF and UF exposure increased NFnB DNA
binding in brain. TNFa increased with F+UF. IL-1 a
increased with UF and F+UF. This suggests a possible
link between PM exposure and neurodegenerative disease
processes.
Reference: Che
et al. (2007,
096460)
Species: Rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Gender: Male
and Female
Age: 9wks
Weight: 190-
220g
Gasoline exhaust (collected from
1996 Guangzhou passenger car
with Dongfeng Gasoline Series
155 kw engine and no exhaust
catalytic converter fuelled with
90-octane lead-free gasoline from
China Petroleum).
Particle Size: NR
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 5.6,16.7, or 50.0
L/kg, final volume 0.3 mL/rat
Time to Analysis: 1fwk for 4wks.
Parameters measured 24h post last
instillation.
A dose-dependent increase was observed in brain DNA
damage starting at 5.6 L/kg. Increase in lipid peroxidation
and carbonyl protein was also observed at 50 L/kg.
Decrease in brain SOD occurred at all exposures. GPx
activity was unchanged with exposure. This suggests an
association between gasoline exhaust and oxidative
damage to the brain.
Reference:
Kleinman et al.
(2008,190074)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: ApoE'
Age: 6wks
Weight: NR
CAPs (Los Angeles, CA) (OC, EC -
— 50%; sulfate, nitrate —11%)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Whole-body Exposure Chamber
Dose/Concentration: High dose: Mass
concentration-114.2/yglm3, Concentrated
factor-15.4±3.2; Low dose: Mass
concentration: 30.4/yg/m3, Concentrated
factor- 4.1 ±0.9
Time to Analysis: Exposed 5hfd, 3dfwk,
6wks. Killed 24h postexposure.
Activated AP-1 dose-dependently increased. Activated NF-
~B significantly increased with the high CAPs dose. GFAP
(which represented activated astrocytes) and activated
JNK significantly increased with the low CAPs dose.
Reference: Liu
et al. (2005,
088650)
Species: Rat
Strain: Wistar
Gender: Male
Aqe: 8wks
CAPs from Taiyuan, China
Particle Size: <2.5//m
Route: IT Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 0,1.5, 7.5, or 37.5
mg/kg, final volume 0.2 mL/rat
Time to Analysis: Assayed 24h following
instillation
In the brain, SOD and CAT activity were significantly
decreased at the 2 highest doses; GSH levels were
significantly decreased at the highest dose. This suggests
an association between PM exposure and oxidative
damage mediated by prooxidant/antioxidant imbalance or
high levels of free radicals.
Reference:
Sirivelu et al.
(2006,111151)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Brown
Norway
Aqe: 12-13wks
CAPs from Grand Rapids, Ml
Particle Size: < 2.5 fjm
Route: Whole-body Exposure
Dose/Concentration: 500//gfm3
Time to Analysis: 8h, assayed at 24-h PE
PVN: CAPs alone or with OVA increased NE.
MPA: CAPs increased Da when treated with OVA while
no changes in NE, 5-HIAA and DOPAC were observed.
Arcuate nucleus: OVA sensitization increased NE levels.
OB: CAPs and OVA increased NE levels, but no changes in
Da, DOPAC, or 5-HIAA were observed.
Other areas: No differences in other areas of
hypothalamus, substantia nigra, or cortex were observed.
CAPs alone or with OVA increased serum corticosterone.
These results suggest that CAPs can cause region-
specific modulation of neurotransmitters in brain and that
the stress axis may be activated causing aggravation of
allergic airway disease.
July 2009
D-167
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Results
Reference:
Veronesi et al.
(2001,015977)
Species: Mouse
Strain: ApoE'1'
or C57BI/6
Age: Young
adults
CAPs from Tuxedo, NY
Particle Size: < 2.5 fjm
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: Varied daily, PM2.6
concentrated 10-fold, producing an average
of 113/yg/m3.
Time to Analysis: 6hfd, 5dfwk for 4m
CAPs-exposed ApoE'1' mice had an 29% reduction in TH-
stained neurons and a 8% increase in GFAP staining
compared to air-exposed ApoE1. No differences were see
in C57 mice. The results suggest that ApoE1 mice,
characterized by increased brain oxidative stress, are
susceptible to PM-induced neurodegeneration.
Reference:
Veronesi et al.
(2005,087481)
Species: Mouse
Gender: NR
Strain: ApoE'1',
C57B1/6
Age: NR
Weight: NR
CAPs (Tuxedo, NY)
Particle Size: 2.5 /jm
Route: Whole-body Exposure
Dose/Concentration: Average: 110 //gfnv1
Time to Analysis: Exposed 6hfd, 5dfwk,
4m.
Dopaminergic neurons significantly decreased in CAPs-
exposed mice compared to the controls. CAPs caused
significantly more astrocytes (as measured by GFAP
staining) in the nucleus compacta compared to the
controls.
Reference:
Win-Shwe et al.
(2008,190146)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male
Strain: BALB/c
Age: 7wks
Weight: NR
DEP (Nanoparticle-rich - NPDE;
81-diesel engine, steady-state
condition, 5h/d, 2000rpm, 0 Nm)
(CO, CO2.NO, NO?, SO?)
Particle Size: Diameter:
26.21 ±1.50nm
Route: Whole-body Exposure Chamber
Dose/Concentration: 148.86 ±8.44 /yglm3
Time to Analysis: Exposed to NPDE or
filtered air 5hfd, 5dfwk, 4wks. Some mice ip
injected with lipoteichoic acid (LTA) 1Xfwk,
4wks. Morris water maze behavioral test:
3d acquisition, 2d probe trial.
Mice in the LTA+NPDE group had significantly longer
mean escape latencies, indicating impaired acquisition of
spatial learning. NPDE directly increased NR1 and TNF-a.
LTA+NPDE increased NR2A, NR2B, and IL-1B, however
LTA was primarily responsible for the increases.
Reference:
Zanchi et al.
(2008,157173)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar
Aqe: 45d
R0FA from Universidade de Sao
Paulo, Brazil
Particle Size: 1.2 ± 2.24/ym
(MMAD)
Route: Intranasal Instillation
Dose/Concentration: 20//gf 10//I saline
Time to Analysis: 30d
Exposed rats had increased lipid peroxidation in striatum
and cerebellum. This could be reversed with N-
acetylcysteine treatment. R0FA treatment altered motor
activity shown by decreased general exploration and
peripheral walking, and was not prevented by NAC.
Results suggests that chronic R0FA induces behavioral
changes and brain oxidative stress.
Table D-6. Reproductive and developmental effects.
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Fedulov
et al. (2008,
097482)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
(pregnant),
Offspring: NR
Strain: BALB/c
Age: NR
Weight: NR
DEP Route: Intranasal Insulfation
Carbon black (CB) Dose/Concentration: DEP, Ti02: 50/yg in 50
j!q2 /jL, 50 /yg/mouse; CB: 250 /yg in 50 fjL
Particle Size' NR Time t0 Analysis: Particle samples baked 3h.
Protocol 1a: Pregnant mice treated with DEP or
Ti02. Analyzed 19 or 48h later. Protocol 1b:
Pregnant mice DEP, Ti02 or CB treated day 14
of pregnancy. 4d-old offspring i.p. injected with
OVA+alum. 12-14d-old exposed aerosolized
OVA.
DEP increased BAL PMN counts in normal and pregnant
mice. In pregnant mice, DEP and Ti02 increased IL-1 B, TNF-
a, IL-6 and KC compared to nonpregnant controls. Offspring
of DEP, CB or Ti02 exposed mice had increased AHR and
airway inflammation. Ti02 exclusively altered the expression
of 80 genes in pregnant mice.
Reference:
Fujimoto et al.
(2005, 096556)
Species: Mouse
Strain: Slc:ICR
Gender: Females
(pregnant mice and
fetuses)
Age: NR (pregnant
females), 14d of
gestation (fetuses)
DE: generated by 2369
cc diesel engine at 1050
rpm at 80% load with
commercial light oil
Particle Size: 0.4 /jm
(MMAD)
Route: Inhalation Chamber
Dose/Concentration: 0.3,1.0 or 3.0 mg
DEP/m3
Time to Analysis: 12hfd, 7dfwk from 2d post
coitumto 13dpc. Sacrificed 14dpc. mRNA
expression examined in female fetuses.
Significant increase in absorbed placentas were observed in
the 0.3 and 3.0 concentration. A decrease in absorbed
placentas was observed for the 1.0 concentration. Increased
inflammatory cytokine mRNA in placentas from exposed
offspring were observed. An increased number of absorbed
placentas in DE-exposed offspring were seen.
July 2009
D-168
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Hougaard et al.
(2008,156570)
Species: Mouse
Strain: C57BI/6
Gender: Pregnant
females, male and
female offspring
Age: 12 & 16 wks
(female offspring),
13 & 17 wks (male
offspring)
DEP(SRM2975)
Particle Size: 90 m2j
(SA)
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 20 mg DEP/nr1
Time to Analysis: Exposed 1 h/d from gestation
days 7-19. Mice separated for behavioral
testing on PND 22 (day of delivery is PND 0).
Behavioral testing at 12,16 wks for female
offspring and 13,17 wks for male offspring.
Body wt of exposed Unchanged at birth. Body wt decreased
At weaning. T4
Unchanged dams & Pups @ weaning. At 2 months, exposed
Female pups required Less time to locate
Platform in spatial Reversal task of Morris Water maze.
Reference:
Hougaard et al.
(2008,156570)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
(pregnant),
Offspring- male,
female
Strain: C57BL/6
Age: NR
Weight: NR
DEP (SRM 2975)
Particle Size: Surface
area: 90mg2/g, Density:
2.1g/cm3, MMAD:
240nm
Route: Inhalation Chamber
Dose/Concentration: 19.1 ±1.13mg DEP/nr1
Time to Analysis: Pregnant dams exposed GD
7-19,1 h/d. GD 20 named PND 0 for pups.
Weights recorded, 1 pup from each group
sacrificed PND 2. Weights recorded PND 9. PND
22 1 male and female removed from each group
for behavioral testing. Dams and remaining
offspring sacrificed PND 23 or 24.
DEP females gained more weight during gestation.
Generally, DEP pups weighed less. No significant DNA
damage was measured, but DEP caused slightly higher IL-6,
MCP-1, and MIP-2. Plasma thyroxin levels as well as
learning and memory were similar amongst the groups.
Reference: Huang
et al. (2008,
156574)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
(adults), male and
female (fetuses)
Strain: Wistar
Age: 8 wks (male
adults), 20d of
gestation (fetuses)
ME: Motorcycle Exhaust
(generated from 1992
Yamaha cabin motocycle
with two-stroke 50 cc
engine).
Particle Size: NR
Route: Nose-only Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 1: 10 and 1: 50 dilutions
Time to Analysis: 2hfd (1 h in morning and 1 h
in afternoon), for 5 consecutive days/wk, for 4
wks (1:50,1:10 dilutions) and 2 wks (1:10
dilution). Male mated with untreated females.
Pregnant females sacrificed on 20d of
gestation. Male and female fetuses observed.
After exposure, decreased body weight and testicular
spermatid number were observed. 1: 10 ME exposure for 4
weeks (no recovery) decreased testicular weight and
increased the inflammatory cytokine mRNA. Glutathione
system and LipidPeroxidation were not affected.
Reference:
Lichtenfels et al.
(2007,097041)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male and
Female
Strain: Swiss
Age: NR
Ambient air in Sao
Paulo, Brazil
Particle Size: NR
Route: Ambient Air Exposure
Dose/Concentration: NA
Time to Analysis: Males housed in open-top
chambers for 24h/d, everyday for 4m, beginning
10d after birth. Males mated to non-exposed
females immediately following exposure. Males
sacrified immediately following mating.
Pregnant females remain in chamber and
sacrificed on 19d of pregnancy.
Decreased testicular, epididymal sperm counts, decreased
number of germ cells, and decreased elongated spermatids
were observed. Decreased SSR, and a sex ratio shift (fewer
males) also occurred after exposure.
Reference: Mauad PM (busy traffic street
et al. (2008,
156743)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male,
Female
Strain: BALB/c
Age: 10d
Weight: Parental:
21,4±4.0 -
26.3 ± 2.8g; 15d-old
offspring: 7.8±1.1
- 9.0 ± 1.0g; 90d-
old offspring:
20.3±2.3 -
27.4±1.8q
Sao Paulo, Brazil; Aug.
2005-April 2006) (NO?,
SO?, CO)
Particle Size:
Diameter: 2.5,10 /jm
Route: Ambient Air Exposure
Dose/Concentration: PM2.6: filtered chamber-
2.9±3.0/yglm3, nonfiltered chamber- 16.9±8.3
/yg/m3; Outdoor concentration: PMio-
36.3±15.8/yglm3, CO- 1.7 ±0.7ppm, NO-
89.4±31.9//g/m3, SO?- 8.1 ±4.8//g/m3
Time to Analysis: Nonfiltered exposure 24hfd
4m. Mated at 120d exposure. After birth, 30
females and offspring transferred to filtered or
nonfiltered chamber. Killed 15 or 90d of age.
Mild foci of macrophage accumulations containing black
dots of carbon pigment occurred in the alveolar areas on
90d-old mice. Surface-to-volume ratio decreased from 15 to
90d of age and was higher in mice exposed to air pollution.
PM exposure reduced inspiratory and expiratory volumes at
higher levels of transpulmonary pressure.
July 2009
D-169
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
Mohallem et al.
(2005, 088657)
Species: Mouse
Strain: BALB/c
Gender: Female
Age: 10wks, 10d
Filtered or ambient air in
downtown Sao Paulo
situated at crossroads
with high traffic density
(predominant source of
air pollution is
automotive).
Component
concentrations in
ambient air: CO: 2.2 ±
I.Oppm; NO2: 107.8 ±
42.3/yg/m3;PMio: 35.5
± 12.8/yg/m3; SO2:
II.2 ± 5.3/yg/m3
Component
concentrations in
filtered air: NO2: 19.5 ±
2.8/yg/m3;PMio: 24.1
± 8.1 /yglm3
Particle Size: NR
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 50 Lfm (polluted
chamber)
Time to Analysis: Exposed for 24 h|7days|wk
for 4 mo. Newborns mated after reaching
reproductive age of 12 wks. All pregnant
females sacrificed between 19th and 20th day of
pregnancy.
No effects in adult exposed animals. Increased implantation
Failure of neonatal Exposed-dams.
Sex ratio, # of Pregnancies,
Resorbtions, Fetal deaths, And fetal placenta Weights
unchanged After neonatal
Ambient air exposure.
Reference: Mori et
DEP:gene
rated by 4-
Route: Dorsal Subcutaneous Instillation
cDNA library screen after
al. (2007, 096564)
cylinder diesel engine
Dose/Concentration: 0.2 ml (of 1.1 mg/ml or
Sub-cut. Injection Found identified activated Clones related
Species: Mouse
Particle Size: NR
0.37 mg/ml)
to Prostanoids 81
Strain: C57/BL
Time to Analysis: 2xfwk for 10 wks.
Arachadonic Acid (Platg2c2c,
Gender: Male
Parameters measured 1wk post last instillation.
AcslG] 81 sperm Production (Stk35). Route of exposure.
Age: 6wks
Unconventional.
Reference: Ono et
al. (2007,156007))
Species: Mouse
Strain: ICR
Gender: Pregnant
females, male
offspring
Age: NR (pregnant
females), 12 wks
(offspring)
DE: generated from 4-
cyl diesel Isuzu engine at
1500 rpm using
standard diesel fuel.
Particle Size: NR
Route: Inhalation (further details NR)
Dose/Concentration:
Time to Analysis: Exposed from 2d post
coitum to 16dpc. Parameters for male offspring
measured on days 8,16, 21, 35, 84 and
sacrificed at 84d.
PND 8 and 16 male repro accessory gl weight decreased.
PND 21 decreased
serum T; PND 84 increased serum T. FSHr, sTAR mRNA
Decreased PND 35 81 84. Rel. testis and epididymal wt
unchanged. Sertoli cell degeneration
Reference: Ono et DE: generated from 4JB- Route: Whole-body Inhalation
al. (2007,156007))
Species: Mouse
Strain: ICR
Gender: Male
offspring, Pregnant
females
Age: 12wks (male
offspring)
2type, light duty 3060
cc 4-cyl Isuzu diesel
engine under 1500 rpm
Particle Size: NR
Dose/Concentration: 1.0 mg DEP/nr
Time to Analysis: Pregnant females
from 2d postcoitum- 16dpc. Without undergoing
further exposure, male offspring sacrificed at
12wks.
Dose-dep increase seminif. Tubule degeneration 81
decreased DSP. 1 mo recovery, DSP recovered at lowest
dose.
Reference:
Pinkerton et al.
(2004, 087465)
Species: Rat
Gender: Female
(pregnant),
Offspring- NR
Strain: SD
Age: 10d (pups),
Pregnant females-
10-14d of gestation
Weight: NR
PM (Fe and soot from
combustion of acetylene
and ethylene in a
laminar diffusion flame
system)
Particle Size: Median
diameter: 72-74nm; size
range: 10-50nm
Route: Inhalation Chamber
Dose/Concentration: Mean mass
concentration: 243±34ug/m3; Average Fe
concentration: 96 /yglm
Time to Analysis: Exposed 10d postnatal a
6hfd, 3d (consecutive). Bromodeoxyuridine
injected 2h before necropsy..
A significant reduction of cell proliferation occurred only
within the proximal alveolar region of exposed animals
compared to controls. There were no significant differences
between the groups for alveolar formation and separation
within the proximal alveolar region
July 2009
D-170
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Silva et
al. (2008,
156981))
Species: Mouse
Strain: Swiss
Gender: Females
(pregnant mice)
Age: 1st, 2nd, 3,d wk
of pregnancy
(females), GD19
(fetuses)
Ambient air Sao Route: Ambient Air Exposure
Paulo, Brazil Dose/Concentration:
Particle Size: Time to Analysis: 1 st week
2nd week
3rd week
or combo of exposure during preg.
Decreased fetal wt with exposure in 1 st week of preg.
Decreased placental Wt with exposure in any of 3 weeks.
Reference: Somers Ambient air
et al. (2002,
078100)
Species: Mouse
Strain: Swiss
Webster
Gender: Male and
Female
Age: 6-8wks (adult
male and females),
5d (pups)
at 2 sites
in Canada (polluted
industrial area 1km
downwind from two
integrated steel mills &
rural location 30km
away)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Ambient Air Exposure
Dose/Concentration: Ambient air
Time to Analysis: Exposed 24hfd, 7dfwk for
10 wks from September 10,1999- November
21,1999. Exposed to clean air for 6wks post-
treatment. Paired with mice within exposure
group. 5d old pups measured.
ESTR germ Line mutations followed .
Heritable mutation rate
increased 1.5 to 2 fold in urban vs. rural site.
Increased freq is paternal line
dependent.
Reference: Somers PM (rural or urban-
et al. (2004, industrial)
0780981 Particle Size: >0.1
Species: Mouse /jm
Gender: NR
Strain: Sentinal
Lab
Age: NR
Weight: NR
Route: Ambient Air Exposure
Dose/Concentration: Mean TSP: Rural-
16.2±8.3-31.7±13.2/yg|m3, Urban-
Industrial- 38.9± 10.5 - 115.3±25.3//g|m3
Time to Analysis: Exposed 10wks. Bred 9wks
postexposure.
The offspring of urban-industrial mice inherited paternal
ESTR mutations 1.9-2.1 times more than rural or HEPA-
filtered offspring. Maternal ESTR mutations were not
significant.
Reference:
Sugamata et al.
(2006,157025)
Species: Mouse
Strain: ICR
Gender: Pregnant
Females, male and
female offspring
Age: 11 wks
(offspring), NR
(pregnant females)
DE (origins NR) Route: Inhalation (more specific information NR)
Particle Size: NR Dose/Concentration: 0.3 mg DEP/nr1
Time to Analysis: Pregnant females exposed
from 2d post coitum to 16dpc. Offspring
sacrificed 11 wks after birth.
Exposed pups increased caspase 3 positive cells &
decreased purkinjie cell # (cerebellum). Similar to human
Autism brain phenotype.
Reference: Tozuka
et al. (2004,
090864)
Species: Rat
Strain: Fischer 344
Gender: Pregnant
females, male and
female fetuses
Age: Gestation day
20 (fetuses), NR
(pregnant females)
DE: generated by diesel
engine (309 cc Model
NFAD-50)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 1.73mgfm3
Time to Analysis: Exposed 6hfd from GD 7-20
with no exposure on Saturdays or Sundays (4
non-exposure days total). Fetuses and maternal
blood collected on GD20. PAHs: Exposed 6hfd
from GD 7-14 with no exposure on Saturdays or
Sundays. Breast milk collected PND14.
Gest & lactational
Exposure to DE's And PAHs.
7 milk PAHs increased in DE
exposed dams. DE exposure
Can lead to PAH Pup exposure through Breast milk.
Reference: Tsukue DE: generated by 2369 Route: Whole-body Inhalation
et al. (2004,
096643)
Species: Mouse
Strain: Sic: ICR
Gender: Pregnant
females, female
fetuses
Age: Gestation day
14 (fetuses)
cc Isuzu diesel engine
operating at 1050 rpm
with 80% load and using
commercial light oil.
Particle Size: NR
Dose/Concentration: 0.1 mg DEPfm3 (at 1:8
dilution with clean air)
Time to Analysis: Exposed for 8hfd from 2d
postcoitum to 13dpc (with no exposure on days
4, 5,11,12). Sacrificed 14dpc. Only female
fetuses studied.
SF-1 & MIS mRNA no change. Other steroidogenic
Genes unchanged. BMP-15, oocyte Differentiation
mRNA decreased.
July 2009
D-171
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Tsukue
et al. (2002,
030593)
Species: Mouse
Strain: C57/BL
Gender: Females,
male and female
offspring
Age: 6wks, 70d
post natal
(offspring)
Filtered air
DE: generated by light-
duty, 4-cylIsuzu diesel
engine at 1500 rpm.
Particle Size: NR
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 0.3,1.0 or 3.0
mg DEP/m3
Time to Analysis: Exposed 12hfd, 7dfwk for 4
mo. Some females sacrified immediately
following exposure. Remainder mated with
unexposed males. Parameters measured in
offspring at postnatal day 70.
DE-exposed females had
Decreased uterine wt at 4 months. Offspring decreased
Body weight @ 6 &
8 weeks of age. Decreased rate Of good nest Construction
(3 mg/m3).
AGD decreased In males (30 & 70 days old). Organ weight
Decreased in Females. Female Crown to rump
Length decreased. Relative weights Not taken.
Reference: Ueng et
al. (2004, 096199)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
Strain: Wistar
Age: 21 d
Cell Line: MCF-7
ME: generated from a
Yamaha Cabin
motorcycle 2-stroke 50-
cc engine and variable
venture carburetor
Particle Size: NR
Route: Intraperiotenial Instillation. Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: IP: 1,10, 50//gfml
Cell Culture: 0.01, 0.1,1,10, 50,100//gfml
Time to Analysis: IP: 1fd for 3d and sacrificed
on 24d. Cell Culture: 3, 24, 30, 48h and 2d.
10 mg/kg +E2 induced
anti estrogenic uterine effects & Antiestrogenic with in vitro
(MCF-7 cells) E2 screen.
Reference: Veras
et al. (2008,
190493)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male,
Female
Strain: BALB/c
Age: 20d,
newborns
Weight: NR
PM (downtown Sao
Paulo, Brazil near
crossroads with high
traffic density, 67%
PM2.6 comprises air
pollution)
Particle Size:
Diameter: 2.5 /jm
Route: Open-Top Chamber
Dose/Concentration: PM2b- 27.5/yg/m3; N02-
101 /yg/m3; CO- 1.81 /yg/m3; S02- 7.66ppm
Time to Analysis: 20d-old mice maintained in
filtered or nonfiltered chamber until 60d-old.
Offspring maintained in respective chambers
until 21 d-old. Offspring mate at 60d-old.
Females euthanized 18th GD.
Fetal weight and maternal blood space volume and surfaces
declined in the groups exposed to nonfiltered air. Fetal
capillary surfaces were greater in nonfiltered air groups.
There was a significant gestational effect on maternaLfetal
surface ratios with values declining significantly in groups
exposed during pregnancy to nonfiltered air. The total
oxygen diffusive conductance of the intervascular barrier
increased significantly during pregestational exposure to
nonfiltered air. Mass-specific conductance increased during
pregestational and gestational periods of exposure to
nonfiltered air.
Reference: Veras
et al. (2009,
190496)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Male,
Female
Strain: BALB/c
Age: 20d
Weight: NR
PM (Sao Paulo, Brazil:
near crossroads with
high traffic density) (Al,
Ca, Cu, Fe, K, Na, Ni, P,
Pb, S, Si, Ti, V, Zn, C)
Particle Size:
Diameter: 2.5 /jm
Route: Open-Top Chamber
Dose/Concentration: Mean: Non-filtered- 27.5
/yg/m3, Filtered- 6.5 /yglm3
Time to Analysis: 20d-old mice maintained in
filtered or non-filtered chamber. Allowed to
mate at 60d. 2 generation model.
Ambient air pollution extended the estrus cycle, which
reduced the number of cycles. Antral follicles decreased.
Mating time increased and fertility and pregnancy indices
decreased. The mean post-implantation loss rate increased,
which was influenced by both pre- and post-gestational
exposure. Fetal weight decreased and was also influenced
by pre- and post-gestational exposure, which exhibited a
significant interaction.
Reference:
Watanabe (2005,
087985)
Species: Rat
Gender: Female
(pregnant),
Offspring- male
Strain: F344/DuCrj
Age: 7d of
gestation -
parturition
(females), 96d
(offspring)
Weight: 240-262g
(offspring)
DE (309cc engine,
Model NFAD50, Yanmar
Diesel Co., Osaka,
Japan, 1800rpm, 45%
load) (PM, NO2)
Particle Size: 90%
<0.5/ym
Route: Inhalation Chamber
Dose/Concentration: High dose total group:
PM- 1.71 /yglm3, N02- 0.79ppm; Low dose total
group: PM- 0.17 /yglm3, N02- 0.10ppm
Time to Analysis: Pregnant rats exposed
gestational day 7 to delivery 6hfd. 5 groups:
high dose total DE, high dose PM, NO2 filtered,
low dose total DE, low dose PM, NO2 filtered,
clean air control. Offspring sacrificed day 96
after birth.
All groups had significantly less daily sperm production than
the control. PM and NO2 in DE decreased spermatogenia but
was not significant, however the high dose PM filtered
group achieved significance. Pachytene cells, spermatids,
and Sertoli cells were lower in all groups compared to the
control.
July 2009
D-172
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Yauk et
al. (2008,157164)
Species: Mouse
Strain: C57BL/6 x
CBA F1 hybrid
Gender: Male
Age: 7-9wks
Hepa-Filtered air (PM
removed) and ambient
air at 2 sites:
¦2km from two
integrated steel mills
¦1km from major
highway on Hamilton
Harbor
Components:
Metals 3.6 ± 0.7 //g/m3
TSP 9.4 + 17 //g/m3
Particle Size: NR
Route: Ambient Air Exposure
Dose/Concentration: Ambient air
Time to Analysis: Parameters measured 3,
10wks, or 10 + 6wks recovery following
exposure.
10+6 weeks exposure induced increased ESTR mutations in
sperm DNA of exposed v filtered. No testicular DNA adducts
seen in exposed males. @ 3wks DNA increased adducts
seen in lungs of exposed males, not in filtered males.
Mutations PM dependent Gas phase independent.
Reference: Yokota DE (2369-cc diesel
et al. (2009,
190518)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
(pregnant), Male
(offspring)
Strain: ICR
Age: NR
Weight: NR
engine, Isuzu Motors,
Ltd., Tokyo, Japan;
1050rpm, 80% load,
commercial light oil)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Inhalation Chamber. Pre natal Exposure
Dose/Concentration: DE: I.Omgfm3; CO:
2.67ppm, NO2: 0.23ppm, SO2: < 0.01 ppm
Time to Analysis: Pregnant mice exposed 8h
for 5d from GD 2-17. Mothers and pups kept in
clean room. Pups weaned on PND 21 then
transported to Tokyo University of Science.
2wk acclimation. Exposed 12h light/dark cycle.
Activity monitor with infrared ray sensor
measured spontaneous motor activity (SMA),
10min intervals 2d. After behavioral test, mice
decapitated.
Prenatal DE exposure decreased SMA in the male offspring.
DE decreased locomotor activity during the light phase.
Dopamine levels in the striatum and nucleus accumbens did
not change, but HVA concentrations decreased in DE-
I mice.
Reference: Yoshida DEfgenerated from a 4-
et al. (2006,
156170)
Species: Mouse
Strain: ICR,
C57BI/6J or DDY
Gender: Pregnant
Females, Male
fetuses
Age: 14d of
gestation (fetuses),
2- 13d of gestation
(pregnant females)
cyl., 2300 cc diesel
Isuzu engine at 1050
rpm and 80% load).
Particle Size: NR
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 0.1 mgDEPfm3
Time to Analysis: Exposure on 2-13d of
gestation. Parameters measured on 14d of
gestation.
Responses to exposure showed strain-related variations
with ICR as the most sensitive followed by C57 and ddY as
the least sensitive. MIS mRNA expression, a factor in male
gonadal differentiation, was significantly decreased in the
ICR and C57 strains. Ad4BP/SF-1 expression was
significantly decreased in the ICR strain only.
Reference: Yoshida
et al. (2006,
097015)
Species: Mouse
Strain: ICR
Gender: Pregnant
females and male
offspring
Age: 2-16d
postcoitum
(pregnant females),
28d (male offspring)
DE: generated by 4Jb1-
type, light duty 4-
cylinder Isuzu diesel
engine using standard
diesel fuel at 1500 rpm.
Particle Size: NR
Route: Whole-body Inhalation
Dose/Concentration: 0.3,1.0 or 3.0 mg
DEP/m3
Time to Analysis: Pregnant females exposed
12h/d, 7d/wk from 2-16d postcoitum. Offspring
sacrificed on postnatal day 28.
NOAEL 0.3 mg DEP/m3 DE exposure induced increased
repro gland weight (two higher doses) male mice. mRNA
decreases aromatase & 3 /y-hD (3.0 mg DEP/m3)
Sex ratio no change. 2 higher doses induced sig increased
repro organ wt. Male pup wt Increased at PND 28. 1.0mg
DEP/m3 pup increased serum T. Serum T positively
correlated with DSP, testis wt, steroid enzyme mRNA.
Reference: Yoshida
et al. 2004 (2004,
097760)
Species: Mouse
Gender: Female
(pregnant),
Offspring- male
Strain: ICR
Age: 4, 6wks
Weight: NR
DE Route: Inhalation Chamber
Particle Size: NR Dose/Concentration: 6wk-old males, embryos:
0.3,1.0, 3.0mg DEP/m3, Pregnant mice: 0.1,
3.0mg DEP/m3
Time to Analysis: 6wk-old males: Exposed
12h/d, 6m. 1 m clean air exposure. Pregnant
mice: Exposed 2-13p.c. 8h/d. Male embryos:
Exposed 2-16p.c. Examined at 4wks-old.
6wl<-old males: In the seminiferous tubules, DE dose-
dependently caused degenerative and necrotic changes,
desquamation of the seminiferous epithelium, and loss of
spermatozoa. Spermatogenesis was still inhibited after a 1 m
clean air exposure.
Pregnant mice: Ad4BP/5F-1 and MIS mRNA significantly
and dose-dependently decreased in male fetuses exposed to
DE.
4wl<-old male newborns: Tissue weight of the testis and
accessory reproductive glands were significantly greater in
DE-exposed mice. Blood testosterone concentration was 8X
higher than the control at 1 .Omg DEP/m3. No significant
differences occurred for testosterone synthetase mRNA.
July 2009
D-173
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
D.1. Carcinogenisis, Mutagenesis, Genotoxicity
Table D-7. Mutagenic/genotoxic effects in bacterial cultures.
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Binkova
et al. (2007,
156273)
Species:
Salmonella (±S9
(rat liver))
Cell Line: Calf
thymus DNA
PM (Prague, Kosice, Sofia,
Czech Republic; summer,
winter) (organic extracts)
Particle Size: Diameter:
< 10/ym
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 100//g EOM/mL
Time to Analysis: PM collected 24h daily
3m, extracted. 24h incubation BaP, c-PAH,
EOM, with or without S9.32P-Postlabeling
4h. Autoradiography 1 -24h.
DNA adducts in EOM treatments were greater with S9 than
without. Positive correlations were found between the amount
of DNA adducts and the PAH content (notably BaP) in the
EOM treatment.
Reference: Brits et
al. 2007
Species: S.
typhimuriam
Strain: TA98±S9
(Ames); TA104
recN2-4 and
TA104pr1 (Vitotox)
Cell Line: Human
whole blood (Comet,
MN assays)
PM (Flanders, Belgium;
urban, rural, industrial sites)
(organic extracts)
Particle Size: Diameter: 10
/jm
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 2.5, 5,10, 20m3 air
equivalents/mL
Time to Analysis: Air samples extracted.
Ames assay 48h. Vivotox test. Comet
assay 24h. MN assay.
Ames: S9 induced mutagenicity of all extracts from all areas
in a dose-dependent manner. Without S9, only extracts from
the urban and industrial areas were mutagenic at the highest
dose.
Vitotox: Extracts were toxic at the highest dose.
Comet: Significant DNA damage in the extracts was seen and
enhanced by S9.
MN: A dose-response relationship was seen in the urban
extracts for increased micronucleated binuclear cells.
Reference: Brown PM (New Zealand, summer, Route: Cell Culture
et al. (2005,
095919)
Species: S.
typhimuriam
Strain:TA98
Cell Line: Rat
hepatoma H4IIE
winter) (extracts)
Dose/Concentration: 9.7-20.8//gfm3
Particle Size: Diameter: 10 (summer), 21.8-61 /yg/m (winter)
Generally, the mutagenic rate was positively correlated to
PMio, as well as PAH and BaP. PMio levels were higher and
more mutagenic in winter than summer.
fjm
Time to Analysis: Air samples collected
15d, extracted. Ames test: Bacteria
growth 12h, incubated 24h. Hepatoma
bioassay: 24h incubation 2x. ER0D assay.
Reference: Bunger DEP (diesel fuel (DF), low- Route: Cell Culture
et al. (2006,
156303)
Species:
Salmonella
typhimuriam
Strain: TA98, TA
100
sulfur diesel fuel (LSDF),
rapeseed oil methyl ester
(RME), and soybean oil
methyl ester (SME)) (SOF-
soluble organic fractions)
Particle Size: Total
particulate matter (no 0CC)
(gh'): Mean DF- 4.0 ± 0.2;
2.8 ± 0.5; 1.8 ± 0.0; 3.4
± 0.2; 1.2 ± 0.1
Dose/Concentration: Log 2 dilutions of
extracts: 1.0, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125
Time to Analysis: S0F extracted 12h.
Plates incubated 48h.
No OCC: Without oxidation catalytic converter (0CC), DF
extract produced the highest number of revertant colonies at
all load modes in both TA98 and TA100 ± S9. RME, SME, and
LSDF extracts caused lower or no mutagenic effects, seen
especially at partial load modes and idle motion.
OCC: With OCC, all extracts reduced the number of revertant
colonies in TA98 and TA100 ±S9 at partial load modes B, C,
and D. At load mode A (rated power), there was an increase of
the number of revertant colonies in all assays -S9, significant
for extracts from RME (TA98, TA100) and SME (TA98). S9
lowered frequency of mutations. At load mode E (idling),
number of revertant colonies of DF extracts increased ±S9.
Reference: Bunger Diesel engine emissions Route: Cell Culture
et al. (2007,
156305)
Species:
Salmonella
typhimuriam
Strain: TA98, TA
100
(DEE)-rapeseed oil (RSO)
and rapeseed methyl ester
(RME, biodiesel), natural
gas derived synthetic fuel
(GTL), and diesel fuel (DF)
(SOF- soluble organic
fractions)
Particle Size: NR
Dose/Concentraion: Log 2 dilutions of
extracts: 1.0, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125
Time to Analysis: SOF extracted 12h.
Plates incubated 48h.
Compared to DF, RSO significantly increased mutagenic
effects of particle extracts (i.e., revertants) by 9.7-59 in TA98
and by 5.4-22.3 in TA100. (mRSO, RSO with lowered
viscosity and fuel preheating in tank, produced highest number
of revertant colonies in both strains ±S9.) RSO fuels
condensates had 13.5 times stronger mutagenicity than DF.
RME extracts had moderate but significantly higher mutagenic
response in TA98 +S9 and TA100 -S9. Effects of GTL did
not differ significantly from DF.
Reference: de Kok
et al. (2005,
088656)
Species: S.
typhimurium
Strain: TA98 (with
and without rat liver
S9)
Cell Line: Salmon
testis DNA
TSP (Total suspended
particulate, Maastricht,
The Netherlands; PMio and
PM2.6 from 6 urban
locations with different
traffic intensities.)
(organic extracts)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: Mutagenicity assay:
2.5, 9, or 18m3 sampled air in 100 //L
DMSO; DNA adduct assay: 5 /jL DMSO
containing PMio or TSP from equivalent
50m3 sampled air. PM2.6 concentration
equivalent to 35m3 sampled air.
Time to Analysis: Mutagenicity assay:
Cells incubated 1h with extracts. DNA
adduct assay: DNA incubated 4h with
extracts.
Overall, the direct mutagenicity and DNA reactivity of PM2.6
extracts were higher compared to PMio and TSP. S9 generally
reduced mutagenic activity in TA98 but increased reactivity to
Salmon testis DNA. Total PAH and total carcinogenic PAH
levels correlated with the mutagenicity of TSP and the S9-
mediated mutagenicity of PM2.6. Neither transition metal
composition nor radical generating capacity of PM correlated
with mutagenic potential. Total PAH and carcinogenic PAH
levels from PMio and PM2.6 correlated with direct and S9-
mediated DNA adducts; for TSP these levels correlated with
direct DNA reactivity only.
July 2009
D-174
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference:
DeMarini et al
(2004, 066329)
Species:
Salmonella
Strain: TA98,
TA98NR, TA98/1,
8-DNP6, YG1021,
YG1024, TA100
A-DEPand forklift DEP
(SRM 2975)
DEP (EOM)
Particle Size: Mean
Diameter: 0.4 /jm
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 0, 0.25, 0.5,1.0,
2.0 EOM /yglplate
Time to Analysis: DEPs sonicated 20min.
Centrifuged 10min. Organic material
extracted and concentrated. Ames assay.
Incubated 3d.
A-DEPs were more mutagenic in both TA98 and TA100 than
SRM 2975. There was 22x more PAH-related and 8-45x
more nitroarene-related activity.
Reference: El
Assouli et al. (2007,
186914)
Species: S.
typhimuriam
Strain: TA98
(±S9)
PM (Jeddah, Saudi Arabia;
11 sites, urban, winter)
(organic extracts)
Particle Size: Diameter: 10
/jm
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 2.5, 50,100
/yg/plate; EOM range: 6-40//g|m3
Time to Analysis: 24h air samples,
extracted. Refluxed 18-24h. GC-MS.
Comet assay. 48h incubation. Ames assay.
PAHs varied from 0.83 to 0.18 ng/m3. Only 2 locations of
heavy petrol driven cars showed strong genotoxic responses.
A correlation existed between DNA damage and the amount of
pollutants and PAHs. Toxicity and mutagenicity occurred only
in the presence of S9. Only 3 of the 11 sites exhibited
moderate mutagenic activities.
Reference: Endo et
al. (2003, 097260)
Species: S.
typhimuriam
Strain: YG1024
(±S9)
PM (Tokyo, Japan: winter)
(organic extracts)
Particle Size: Diameter:
>12.1 - 0.06 > /jm;
Bimodal mass
concentration: 1-2 /jm
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 2.5, 5,10//L; 0.30
- 22.76/yglm3
Time to Analysis: Air samples collected,
extracted. 90min pre incubation. 48h
incubation.
Mutagenicity tests showed dose-response relationships that
were higher without S9 and increased with decreasing size.
Reference:
Erdingeret al.
(2005,156423)
Species: S.
typhimurium
Strain: TA98.
TA100, TA98NR
PM (Baden-Wurttemberg,
Germany: urban, 8
locations, glass fiber filters)
(organic extracts)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 0.25, 2.5, 5,12.5,
25 m3/plate
Time to Analysis: Standard Ames test
protocol followed.
Extracts were mutagenic in all strains evaluated. No
significant difference in response with or without metabolic
activation. Activity in TA98NR suggests that the mutagenicity
correlates with concentrations of air pollutants such as NOx.
Reference:Iba et
al. (2006,156582)
Species: S.
typhimuriam
Strain: TA98,
TA100 (±S9 (rat
liver))
PM (wood smoke (WS)
(New Jersey) and cigarette
smoke (CS) (Tobacco
Research and Health
Institute, University of
Kentucky)) (organic
extracts)
Particle Size: 10 //I
aliquots of organic extracts
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 62.5,12.5/yg TPM
equivalent/plate
Time to Analysis: Incubation, shaking
25min. Agar added. 48h incubation. Rat
lung explants incubated 18h. 12h
incubation with treatments.
WS and CS were equally mutagenetic to TA98, but CS was 3-
fold more mutagenetic to TA100 than WS. CS induced
CYP1A1 in the explants, but WS did not.
Reference: Liu et
al. (2005, 097019)
Species: S.
typhimurium
Strain: YG1024,
YG1029
Cell Line: Chinese
hamster lung V79
cells
DEP extract (DP), gasoline
engine exhaust particulate
extract (GP), diesel exhaust
SV0C extract (DSV0C),
gasoline engine SV0C
extract (GSV0C), NIST SRM
1650a
Particle Size: Gasoline PM:
0.554mg extract (mg PM)"1;
Diesel PM: 0.363mg extract
(mg PM)1
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 1.48,4.44,13.3,
40,120, 360,1080 //g/plate
Time to Analysis: 30min preincubation.
48h (YG1029). 66h (YG1024). Overnight
preincubation 20h.
Mutations: All samples induced mutations in both strains.
The increase was highly significant and dose-dependent.
Response with S9 was generally greater than without S9. PM
extract was more mutagenic than SV0C extract.
DP, GP, and GSVOC: Dose-response was seen for DNA
damage and micronuclei induction. GP, GSVOC and SRM
1650a were stronger inducers of micronuclei than DP.
Reference:
Matsumoto et al.
(2007,187020)
Species: S.
typhimuriam
Strain: TA98,
TA100 (±S9)
APM (airborne particulate
matter)
APE (airborne particulate
extracts)
(Hokkaido, Japan;
residential)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: Crude APE:
979mg/m3 air (CALUX BaP Equivalent
(BaPEq)), 21mg/m3 air (CALUX TCDD
Equivalent (TCDDEq)); Cleaned APE:
7.87mg/m3air (CALUX BaPEq),
0.614mg|m3 air (CALUX TCDDEq)
Time to Analysis: Air samples collected,
extracted. Preincubation with S.
typhimuriam. 3, 24h exposure in CALUX
assay. RNA extracted from mice 6d after
last application.
Most of the CALUX BaPEq for crude APE was derived from
PAH-like compounds, as suggested by the CALUX BaPEq of
cleaned APE accounting for 0.80% of CALUX BaPEq for crude
APE. CALUX TCDDEq showed TCDD and similar compounds
to have a low contribution. The TA100 strain was more
mutagenic to APE, with and without S9. S9 increased
mutagenecity in both strains.
July 2009
D-175
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: PM (EOM) (Plzen, Prague, Route: Cell Culture
«nSn0,rkn°o^8la!- D'" m-"? " Cz8ch Dose/Concentration: TA98 (4 doses): 20-
(2004,087431) Republic) 200//g/plate, YG1041 (4 doses): 4-20
Species: 5 Particle Size: Diameter: 10 //gfplate
typhimuriam m Time to Analysis: Collected 24h every
Strain: TA98, 18th day, Oct-Mar, 1999-2003. Extracted.
YG1041 (±S9) Ames assay. 70h incubation.
Significant dose-response effects in mutagenic potency of
EOM occurred. Prague, one of the most polluted cities, had
the highest mutagenicity values. Increasing time-trends were
observed in the TA98±S9 mutagencity and PAH
concentrations.
Reference: Rivedal DEP (SRM 1650)(organic Route: Cell Culture
et al. (2003,
097684)
Species: S.
typhimurim
Strain: TA100,
TA98, TA100NR,
TA98NR, TA98/1,8-
DNPo
extracts) (fractionated into
PAH, nitro-PAH, dinitro-
PAH, aliphatics, polar
fraction)
Particle Size: NR
Dose/Concentration: Ames: 300, 600
DEP/plate; Gap junction: 100, 200 /yglmL
DEP
Time to Analysis: Extracted 16h.
Fractionated. Ames assay. Gap junction
intracellular communication: exposed 1-6h.
Western blot.
TA100 was the most mutagenic without S9 activation. GJIC
was dose- and time-dependently inhibited. The polar fraction
was the most potent inhibitor. Nitro-PAH and dinitro-PAH
were the most responsive fractions in the Ames assay.
Reference:
Seagrave et al.
(2003, 054979)
Species:
Salmonella
Strain: TA98,
TA100
Compressed natural gas
(CNG) emissions (heavy-
duty vehicles): High emitter
(HE), Normal emitter (NE),
New technology (NT)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: PM (mg/mi)- NE-
7.0, NT- 5.0, HE- 406; Recovered PM
(mg/mi)- NE-1.26, NT- 0.71, HE-57.1;
Recovered SV0C- NE- 58, NT- 26.4, HE-
227.5
Time to Analysis: Samples collected in
filters 7x/d over several days. Recovered
PM, recovered SV0C extracts combined.
Ames assay.
All three CNG emissions were mutagenic in both strains.
Mutagenicity was reduced by S9 in TA100 but not in TA98.
Activity ranking in both strains was HE > NE > NT.
Reference: Sharma
et al. (2007,
156975)
Species:.?
typhimurium
Strain: TA98,
YG1041, YG5161
Cell Line: Human
A549 lung epithelial
cells
PM (airborne, 4 sites: an
oven hall and receiving hall
in a waste incineration
plant: heavy-traffic street:
background: Mar-June
2005)
Particle Size: Diameter:
2.5 /jm
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 0.25mgfml
Time to Analysis: Samples taken over 7-
16d. A549 cells incubated 24h. Comet and
microsuspension assays performed.
DNA damage: Samples from all four sites induced DNA
damage in the comet assay with the street samples more
damaging than the oven hall sample.
Mutations: Microsuspension assay was used to assess
mutagenic activity. No mutagenic activity was observed for
any of the non-polar fractions from any sample sites. The
moderately polar fractions were all mutagenic, except for the
oven hall sample, only when S9 was added. Comparatively,
the polar and crude fractions were mutagenic without
metabolic activation, suggesting a direct mutagenic effect.
Reference: Song et
al. (2007,155306)
Species: S.
typhimurium
Strain: TA98,
TA100
Cell Line: Rat
fibrocytes L-929
cells
PM (soluble organic fraction Route: Cell Culture
(S0F) extracts from diesel
engines using fuels blended
with ethanol by volume: E0
¦ base diesel fuel: E5 ¦ 5%:
E10- 10%;E15-15%; E20
¦20%)
Particle Size: Density
(g/cm3): E0- 0.8379; E5-
0.8349; E10-0.8324; E15-
0.8301; E20- 0.8279
Dose/Concentration: Ames Assay:
0.025, 0.05, 0.1 mg/plate; Comet Assay:
0.125, 0.25, 0.5,1.0mg|mL
Time to Analysis: Samples extracted
24h. Ames and comet assays performed
All PM extracts induced higher mutational response in TA98
(3- to 5-fold increase over spontaneous) than in TA100 (2-to
3-fold increase). The highest brake specific revertants (BSR)
±S9 in both strains occurred with E20 and lowest BSR was in
E5 (except in TA98 -S9). E0 and E20 caused more significant
DNA damage (similar in effect) than the other extracts.
Damage was dose-dependent but variable with increasing
ethanol volume.
Reference: Zhang
et al. (2007,
157186)
Species: S.
typhimurium
Strain: TA98,
TA100
Cell Line: Human
lung
adenocarcinoma
A549 cells
Gasoline engine exhaust
(GEE)
Methanol engine exhaust
(MEE)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: MTT Assay- 0.05-
0.8 GEE or MEE L/ml; MN Assay- 0.025,
0.05, 0.1, 0.2 GEE or MEE L/ml; Comet
Assay-0.025, 0.05,0.1,0.2, 0.4 GEE or
MEE L/ml; Ames Assay- GEE: 0.625,1.25,
2.5, 5.0,10, 20 L/plate; MEE: 0.3125,
0.625,1.25, 2.5, 5.0,10, 20 L/plate
Time to Analysis: Organic extracts from
GEE and MEE. MTT assay- 24h incubation,
followed by 2 or 24h incubation, followed
by 4h incubation. MN assay- 24h
incubation. Comet assay. Ames assay- 72h
incubation.
Mutagenicity: GEE was mutagenic in TA98 but not TA100, -
S9 at 10 and 20 L/plate and +S9 at £1.25 L/plate.
Mutagenicity was higher with S9 than without at 0.625-10
L/plate and a dose-response was reported. MEE had no effect
in either strain.
MN: GEE significantly and dose-dependently induced MN. MEE
had no significant effect at any dose.
DNA damage: GEE significantly induced DNA damage at all
doses compared to controls. MEE had no effect at any dose.
July 2009
D-176
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Pollutant
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Zhao et DEP (SRM 2975)
al. (2004,100972)
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Sprague-
Dawley
Age: NR
Weight: — 200g
Cell Line: S.
typhimurium
YG1024 (±S9)
DEPE (SRM 1975)
Carbon black (CB) (Elftex-
12 furnace black, Cabot,
Boston, MA)
Particle Size: NR
Route: IT Instilled. Cell Culture.
Dose/Concentration: DEP or CB:
35mg/kg body weight; S9: 25, 50,100,
200 /yg/plate; Cytosolic protein: 20,40,
80,160 /yglplate; Microcosmal protein: 5,
10, 20, 40 /yglplate
Time to Analysis: Rats instilled.
Sacrificed 1, 3, 7d postexposure. S9,
cytosolic, microcosmal fractions prepared
from lung homogenates. Ames assay: 72h
incubation.
DEP and CB-exposed lung S9 time-dependently decreased 2-
aminoanthracene (2-AA) mutagenicity. Metyrapone and a-
napthoflavone inhibited the S9-activation of 2-AA in DEP and
CB exposed rats. Lung S9 increased the mutagenicity of DEPE
but not of DEP or CB. Liver S9 reduced DEPE dose-
dependently. CYP2B1 and CYP1A1 activated DEPE, with
CYP2B1 being more effective.
Reference: Zhao et
al. (2006,100996)
Species: S.
typhimuriam
Strain: YGL024
(±S9)
DEP (SRM 2975)
DEPE (SRM 1975)
Aminoguanidine (AG)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: NR
Time to Analysis: Lung S9 obtained from
rats used in in vivo experiment. Ames test.
Modified microsuspension assay. All
assays in duplicate plates. Repeated 3x.
AG significantly lowered 2-aminoanthracene mutagenic
activity of DEP or DEPE-exposed lung samples, with DEP being
lowered the most.
Table D-8. Mutagenicity and genotoxicity data summary: in vitro studies.
Reference
Particle
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Abou Chakra
et al. (2007, 098819)
Species: Human
Gender: Male, Female
Age: 6-13yrs and Adults
Participant
Characteristics: Non-
smokers
Cell Line: HeLa S3 cells
PM (3 French metropolitan cities:
Urban PM2.6 and PM10 from
"Residential Sector," "Proximity
Sector," "Industrial Sector'!
(organic extracts)
Particle Size: Diameter: 2.5,10 //m
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 261 PM2.6; 76
PMiosamples
Time to Analysis: Cells incubated with
200; fjL organic extract and 20 /jl
aphidicoline for 24h.
Seasonal variation was observed with genotoxic
effects being greater in winter. PM2.6 was more
active than PM10 extracts. Samples from the
"Proximity Sector" (downtown area with heavy
traffic) exhibited the strongest genotoxic
responses.
Reference: Arrieta et al.
(2003,096210)
Species: Rat
Cell Line: Hepatoma
(H4IIE)
Species: Mouse
Cell Line: Hepatoma
H111.1 c2
PM (El Paso, Texas: Juarez,
Chihuahua, Mexico; Sunland Park,
New Mexico) (organic extracts)
Particle Size: Diameter: 10 //in
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: EROD test: 0.03,
0.17,0.34,0.50, 0.68, 4.96, 9.93
extract equivalents (m3 air); Luciferase:
0.17,0.51,1.26, 5.01 extract
equivalents (m3 air)
Time to Analysis: Extracts incubated
24h. EROD, luciferase activity, PAH
content determined.
EROD activity declined at higher extract
amounts, but luciferase activity was not
inhibited. Cytotoxicity occurred only at extract
equivalents to 0.47 m3air. PAH concentration
increased with PM mass.
Reference: Bao et al.
(2007,097258)
Cell Line: Human-
hamster hybrid (Al)
DEP (organic extracts) (SRM 2975)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 10, 20, 50,100
/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: Phagocytosis
inhibitors: Exposed 24h with or without
cytochalasin B or ammonium chloride.
Cytotoxicity: 24, 48h incubation.
Mutations: Exposed 24h. 5-7d culture.
Incubated additional 7-8d.
The nucleus of DEP-treated cells was condensed
and shrunken compared to controls. DEPs
accumulated in cells, disrupting the
mitochondrial cristae, and were lodged in large
cytoplasmic vacuoles. DEP produced minimal
toxicity. CD59 locus mutations dose-
dependently increased but decreased when
simultaneously treated with cytochalasin B or
ammonium chloride.
Reference: Carvalho-
Oliveria et al. (2005,
077898)
Species: T. pallida, A.
cepa
PM (Sao Paulo, Brazil; spring, bus
strike and non-strike days) (organic
extracts)
Particle Size: Diameter: 2.5 /jm
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: Strike day: 47.32
/yg/m3; Non-strike day: 43.01 /yglm3
Time to Analysis: Air samples from 2d:
bus strike day, bus non-strike day. T.
pallida kept in lab 24h. Exposed 8h. 24h
recovery. Fixed 24h. A. cepa roots
induced 5d. Exposed 30h. Fixed 24h.
Element concentrations, sulfur and BTEX
decreased on the strike day. Micronuclei
decreased in T. pallida during the strike. Toxicity
measured in A. cepa was not significant, but
higher on strike days.
July 2009
D-177
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Particle
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Dybdahl et al. DEP (SRM 1650)
(2004, 089013) Particle Size: NR
Species: Human
Cell Line: Lung epithelial
A549
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 10, 50,100, 500
/yg DEP/mL
Time to Analysis: DEP suspended,
sonicated. A549 cells diluted. Fresh
medium added after 24h. After 48h
medium removed, DEP added. 2, 5, 24h
incubation.
DEP induced dose-dependent increases of IL-1 a,
IL-6, IL-8, TNF-a. The cytokines increased 4-18-
fold at the highest dose. Cell viability did not
decrease. Comet tail length increased at 100
and 500 /yglmL for 2, 5, 24h.
Reference: Gabelova et
al. 2006
Species: Human
Cell Line: Hepatoma Hep
G2
PM (winter, summer) (organic
extracts)
Particle Size: Diameter: 10 //in
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 5,10, 20, 50,
100,150/yg|mL
Time to Analysis: 3m sampling periods,
winter, summer. Cells grown 48h.
Exposed 2h. Single cell gel
electrophoresis or cultivated, harvested,
processed 2, 4,16, 24h.
PM, c-PAHs and genotoxicity were higher in
winter air samples than summer. E0M samples
generally had significant dose-dependent
increases in DNA migration. Repair-specific DNA
endonucleases did not increase DNA migration.
8-oxodG was below the steady-state level in
E0M samples.
Reference: Gabelova et
al. 2007
Species: Human
Cell Line: Hepatoma Hep
G2
PM (PRG-SM, PRG-LB, Kosice, Sofia;
winter, summer) (organic extracts)
Particle Size: Diameter: 10 //m
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 5-150//cj/niL
Time to Analysis: Air samples collected
24h intervals, 3m sampling period. Cells
grown 48h. Exposed 2h. 24, 48h
preliminary experiments. Single cell gel
electrophoresis.
Cell viability significantly decreased in the 24,
48h exposure groups compared to the 2h
exposure group. DNA migration significantly
dose-dependently increased at most
concentrations. In general, oxidative DNA
damage did not significantly increase.
Reference: Gabelova et
al. 2007
Species: Human
Cell Line: Hepatoma Hep
G2 cell line
PMio (Prague (Czech Republic),
Ko'sice (Slovak Republic) and Sofia
(Bulgaria); urban, winter, summer)
(organic extracts)
Particle Size: Diameter: 10 //m
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 5 to 150/yglml
E0M from 50/yglml stock solution
Time to Analysis: 24h DNA adduct
formation. 2h Comet assay. Oxidative
DNA damage measured by Fpg-sensitive
sites.
Total DNA adducts ranged from ~ 60 to 200
adducts per 10s nucleotides. Extracts also
produced approximately the same levels of
strand breaks. Results suggested that the
genotoxic potential of ambient air was at least
6-fold greater in the winter compared to
summer. No substantial difference was reported
for oxidative DNA damage induced by summer
vs. winter samples.
Reference: Gong et al.
(2007,091155)
Species: Human
Cell Line: Microvascular
endothelial (HMEC)
DEP (aggregates, exhaust 4JBi-type
LD,274 1,4-cylinder Isuzu diesel
engine, 10 torque load, cyclone
impactor, dilution tunnel constant
volume sampler)
Particle Size: Diameter: < 1 /ym
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 5,15, 25/yglmL
Time to Analysis: Cells treated with
DEP, ox-PAPC (oxidized 1 -palmitoyl-2-
arachidonyl-OT-glycero-3-
phosphorylchlorine), DEP+ox-PAPC.
Analytical tests performed.
H0-1 expression was dose-dependent and
greatest with the DEP+ox-PAPC treatment. DEP
significantly dose-dependently upregulated or
downregulated a number of genes and was
shown to have a synergistic effect with co-
treatment of ox-PAPC. The most varying genes
were significantly enriched for EpRE,
inflammatory response, UPR, immune response,
cell adhesion, lipid metabolism, apoptosis and
protein folding genes.
Reference: Greenwell et
al. (2003, 097478)
Species: Rat
Cell Line: Epithelial fluid;
icosahedral bacteriophage
~X174-RF DNA
PM (South Wales, UK) (urban,
industrial)
Particle Size: Coarse diameter: 10-
2.5 /jm, Fine diameter: 2.5-0.1 /ym
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: Urban mean: 18.7
± 4.7mg/day; Industrial mean: 22.6 ±
2.5mg/day
Time to Analysis: 24h air samples 4-
11 d. Substrates vortexed 1 h, suspended
4h, centrifuged 1h. Oxidation assay.
Industrial PM was more bioreactive than urban
PM. Coarse fractions had greater oxidative
potential and bioreactivity than fine fractions.
Reference: Gu et al.
2005
Species: Hamster
Strain: Chinese
Cell Line: Lung fibroblast
(V79)
DPM (1980 model General Motors
5.7-L V-8 engine)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 25, 50,100,150
/yglmL; 10 /yg DPM in 10 /yg in
DPPC/mL; 10 /yg DPM in 10 /yg
DMSO/mL
Time to Analysis: Chromosomal
aberration: 24h incubation. Treated 24h.
Incubated again 24h. MN assay: 24h
treatment. Gene mutation: 24h
treatment. Cells replated. 7d expression
times. Staining at 8,10d.
DPM significantly and dose-dependently
increased aberrant cells at 25-100/yglmL. DPM
increased MN formation dose-dependently.
Mutant frequencies were not significant and
showed no dose-dependent trends. DPM was
toxic to cells at the highest concentration.
Reference: Gualtieri et
al. (2005, 097841)
Species: Human
Cell Line: Alveolar lung
(A549)
TD (Tire debris, generated by rotating
new vehicle wheel against a steel
brush, significant component of PMio)
(organic extracts)
Particle Size: Diameter: 10-80 /ym
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 50, 60, 75/yglmL
Time to Analysis: Particles extracted
6h. Cells subcultured every 3-4d. After
24h, TD treatments 24,48, 72h.
A time- and dose-dependent inhibitory effect on
the reduction of MTT was seen. Mortality
increased dose-dependently and was
significantly greater than the controls. DNA
strand breaks increased significantly in a dose-
dependent manner. A significant cell cycle block
in the G1 phase with a consequent decrease in
the cell number in the S and G2/M phases was
seen. Exposed cells had a modified morphology.
July 2009
D-178
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Particle
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Gutierrez-
Castillo et al. (2006,
089030)
Species: Human
Cell Line: A549 type II
alveolar epithelial cells
PM2.6 and PM10 (4 monitoring stations
in Mexico City: (1) downtown high
auto traffic, (2) two industrial areas
with high levels of auto traffic and
low vegetation, (3) medium-traffic
residential area) (winter, spring , 4
sampling days in each period)
(aqueous and organic extracts)
Particle Size: Diameter: 2.5 or 10
/jm
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 0.05, 0.07,
0.1 m3/ml equivalents PM2.6; 0.82,1.25,
1.63m3/ml equivalents PM10
Time to Analysis: Cells treated 48h
with water-soluble or organic-soluble PM
extracts.
Higher amounts of water-soluble metals were
found in samples collected during winter. Water-
soluble extracts increased DNA damage 1.7-fold
over the background. Similar results were
observed with organic extracts. In general, PM2.6
extracts had greater genotoxic potential than
PM10 extracts, and water soluble fractions form
both particle sizes were more genotoxic than the
corresponding organic extracts.
Reference: Izawa H et al.
(2007,190387)
Cell Line: NA
DEPE (4JB-1 Isuzu 4-cylinder direct-
injection 2740cc diesel engine;
1500rpm, 10kg/m load)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: DEP: Ah-1
experiment- 111, 55.5, 27.8,13.9, 6.9,
3.5,1.7/yglmL; Foods, polyphenols
experiment- 27.8/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: DEPE incubated 2h
for dioxin toxicity measurement.
Absorbance at 405nm measured. Food,
polyphenol inhibitory effects: food
extract or polyphenol solution added to
cytosol solution, shaken 5min. DEPE
added, shaken 5min. 2h incubation.
Absorbance at 405nm measured.
The dioxin toxicity equivalent was 6,479±58ng
DEQ/g of DEP. The absorbance showed a
sigmoid curve and dose-dependently increased
from 6.9 to 27.8/yg DEP/mL. The Ginkgo bifoba
extract significantly inhibited AhR activation
significantly more than the other foods, and was
followed by green tea, onions, and garlic,
~uercetin and myricetin dose-dependently
inhibited AhR activation. Ginkgolides A and B
had weak inhibitory effects and resveratol was
the weakest.
Reference: Jacobsen et DEP (SRM 1650b)
al. (2008,156597)
Species: Mouse
Cell Line: FE1-MutaTI
lung epithelial cells
Carbon black (CB) (Printex 90)
Particle Size: DEP: 18-30nm; CB:
14nm; Agglomerates in suspensions:
DEP Peaks- 249nm, CB Peaks-
476nm
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 37.5, 75/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: 8 repeated 72h
incubations.
Mutagenicity: The 75/yg/mL dose was
significantly increased compared to the 37.5
/yg/mL dose. Linear regression showed a
significant increasing trend by increasing
exposure. There was no change in the total cell
numbers.
ROS: ROS production increased in DEP-treated
cells after 3h of exposure. CB-treated cells
showed a dose-dependent increase.
Reference: Karlsson et
al. 2004
Species: Human
Cell Line: Fibroblasts;
calf thymus DNA with
human liver microsomes
or rat liver S9
PM (urban dust particles, SRM 1649)
(extracted with DCM, acetone,
DMSO, water) (Fe 3% w/w, Ti 0.32%
w/w, V 0.04% w/w, Mn 0.03% w/w,
Cu 0.025% w/w)
Particle Size: Mean diameter: < 10
/ym
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 0.1,1.0,10,100
/yg/cm2
Time to Analysis: Particles extracted.
Fibroblasts exposed 24h. Comet assay.
Calf thymus incubated 2h with
microsomes or S9.32P-labelled.
DNA damage increased dose-dependently, and a
significant amount of DNA-damaged cells had
particle interactions. DNA damage induced by
the insoluble particle core significantly increased
after each extraction. Native particles were
more genotoxic than those extracted with
DMSO, DCM and water, but not with acetone or
hexane. DMSO extracts had the most adduct-
forming PACs, and water extracts had the most
oxidizing substances.
Reference: Karlsson et
al. (2005, 086392)
Species: Human
Cell Line: Lung epithelial
A549 type II
PM (subway station, urban street)
Subway particles: O2, Fe (Fe from
Fe304) Street particles: Fe from Fe203
Particle Size: Diameter: 10 //in
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: Comet: 5,10, 20,
40/yg/cm2; 8-oxodG: 10/yg/cm2
Time to Analysis: Air sampled 24h
daily. Cells grown 24h. Exposed 4h.
Both PM types induced concentration-dependent
DNA damage, but subway particles were more
potent. Subway particles caused more 8-oxodG
formation and oxidation of dG, the latter of
which was inhibited by deferoxaminemesylate.
Oxidation from subway particles was due to
nonsoluble, redox active substances, and soluble
substances from street particles.
Reference: Karlsson et
al. (2006,156625)
Species: Human
Cell Line: Lung epithelium
A549; monocytes from
heparinized whole blood
PM (wood- old, modern boiler; pellets-
pellets burner, electrical ignition; tire-
road simulator studded, friction tires;
Street- busy street, Stockholm;
Subway- platform near street)
Particle Size: Diameter: 2.5,10/ym
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 40/yg/cm2
Time to Analysis: Samples collected.
Blank filter and Teflon filters used. Cells
grown 24h. Comet assay. Monocytes
incubated 10d. Macrophages incubated
18h.
All particles tested caused DNA damage, but
there was no significant difference between the
size fractions. Subway particles were the most
genotoxic. The urban street particles were the
most potent inducers of the cytokines. On the
Teflon filters, PMiowas somewhat more potent
than PM2.6.
Reference: Kubatova et
al. (2004, 087986)
Species: Monkey
Cell Line: African green
kidney COS-1 (CV-1 cells
with origin-defective
SV40 mutants); (±S9)
PM (DE from diesel bus, wood smoke
(WS) from chimney, hardwood smoke)
(organic extracts)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 25, 50,100, 200
/yg/mL; 50mg of each material used for
all experiments
Time to Analysis: DE and WS collected.
Extracted. 24h cytotoxicity. 2h SOS
chromotest.
WS had significantly increased cytotoxicity in
fractions of 25-250°C, and DE in nonpolar
fractions of 250 and 300°C and polar fractions
of 50°C. The cytotoxicity of DE PM nonpolar
fractions corresponded to increased
concentrations of PAHs. WS was not genotoxic
and DE was genotoxic in midpolarity fractions
(50-250°C). Genotoxic response was not
increased after S9 activation.
July 2009
D-179
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Particle
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Landvik et al.
(2007,096722)
Species: Mouse
Cell Line: Hepatoma
Hepa1c1c7 cells
DEP extracts (DEPE in the paper)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 10, 20, 30, 50,
70/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: Cells exposed 24h.
DNA fragmentation assay.
50 and 70/yglmL DEPE did not induce DNA
fragmentation but did cleave caspase 3 to a
minor extent.
Reference: Mehta et al.
(2008,190440)
Species: Human
Cell Line: Lung
adenocarcinoma (A549)
PM (SRM 1949a)
Particle Size: Diameter: ~ 0.18/ym
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 0, 50,100, 200,
400/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: Cell culture and cell
viability assay: PM treatment 24h. 10d
incubation. Host cell reactivation assay:
pGL3-luciferase plasmid UV irradiated
20min. PM treatment 24h. 16h
transfection. 24h PM incubation. DNA
repair synthesis assay: PM treatment
24h. Proteinase K treatment 30min. supf
mutagenesis assay: PM treatment 24h.
PM culture 60h. DNA extracted.
Overnight incubation of transformed
bacteria.
PM reduced colony-forming ability and repair
synthesis capacity was proportional to the PM
concentration. PM dose-dependently decreased
HCR capacity and decreased more than TSP. PM
induced cyclobutane dimmers and
pyrimidine < 6-4 > pyrimidones mutations in UV-
irradiated supf.
Reference: Meng et al.
2007
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar
Age: NR
Weight: Mean: 230g;
Range: 200-250g
Cell Line: AMs from
treated rats
PM (Baotou, Wuwei, China) (normal
weather, dust storms, Mar 1-31)
(organic extracts, water soluble
fractions)
Particle Size: 2.5 /jm
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: AM: 0, 33.3,
100, 300/yglmL; Water-soluble: 0, 75,
150, 300/yglmL; Organic extracts: 0,
25, 50,100 /yglmL; Mass concentration
normal day: 68.49±28.83//g|m3; Mass
concentration dust storm day:
221.83 ± 69.89 //g|m3
Time to Analysis: Samples collected
24h after 5pm. Extracted. Rats instilled
24h. Killed, lavaged. Cultures 4h.
0C, NH4+, NO3' were higher in normal weather
PM2.6. SO42', Ca2+were higher in dust storm
PM2.6. Fe, Al, Ca, Mg were 5x higher in dust
storm PM2.E. Cell viability reduced in a
concentration-dependent manner, with normal
weather being slightly more cytotoxic. DNA
damage was dose-dependently induced, with
normal weather and organic extracts showing
the greatest damage.
Reference: Motta et al.
2004
Species: Hamster
Strain: Chinese
Cell Line: Epithelial liver,
ovary
PM (Catania, Sicily; spring) (organic
extracts)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 0.60,1.21, 2.42,
4.85,9.70,19.40/yg/mL; 0.78,1.56,
2.12, 6.25,12.50, 25.00//g/mL
Time to Analysis: 2, 3h air sampling.
Extracts 4h. 24h treatment.
The treatment was only slightly cytotoxic at the
highest dose. DNA damage and aberrant cells
generally increased with dose. No effect was
seen in the Chinese hamster ovary cells without
metabolic activation.
Reference: Oh and Chung
(2006, 088296)
Cell Line: A549 (Comet),
CH0-K1 (CBMN), H4IIE
(EROD-microbiassay)
Crude extract (CE) DEP and fractions
of CE of DEP (organic extracts: F1 ¦
organic bases, F2 - organic acids, F3
- aliphatic, F4 - aromatic, F5 ¦
slightly polar, F6 -moderately polar,
F7 ¦ high polar)
Particle Size: Diameter: <2.5//m,
87.71%, 2.5-10/ym, 3.87%, >10
fjm, 8.42%
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 100 //g/mL
Time to Analysis: DEP generated,
extracted. Comet assay- 24h incubation,
CE, DEP exposed 24h. MN assay-
cultured 24h, 4h treatment, growth
medium incubation 20h. EROD-
microbioassay- 48h.
DNA damage: CE significantly increased the
amount of DNA damage in A549 cells with and
without SKF-525A, a CYP450 inhibitor, and in
CH0-K1 cells. It significantly increased MN
formation ±S9 compared to controls.
Organic Extracts: Organic base (F1) and
neutral (F3-F7) fractions of CE of DEP
significantly induced DNA damage without SKF-
525A compared to controls. Adding SKF-525A
completely inhibited damage caused by F3, F4,
F6 and F7 but kept the effect of F1 similar to
that without SKF and only partially inhibited
that of F5. F2 did not induce DNA damage with
or without SKF. All fractions except F6 induced
MN formation ±S9.
Reference: Poma et al.
(2006, 096903)
Species: Mouse
Cell Line: Macrophage
RAW 264.7
PM (L'Aquila, Italy; urban) Route: Cell Culture
Carbon black (CB) Dose/Concentration: 1, 3,10//gfcnr
Particle Size: Diameter: 2.1-0.43 //m Time to Analysis: Air samples collected
weekly basis Jan-Mar 2004. Cells
cultured 48h. Treatment 48h. MN assay: equally-weighted CB
44h incubation, 28h incubation.
PM and CB dose-dependently reduced cell
proliferation and induced micronuclei. PM and
CB also reduced cellular metabolism of the
macrophages and induced significant amounts of
apoptosis. PM produced more micronuclei than
Reference: Poma et al.
2006
Species: Mouse
Cell Line: RAW 264.7
macrophage
PM (urban, winter)
Particle Size: Diameter: 2.5 /jm
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 2.2, 6.6, 22
//g/mL
Time to Analysis: Cells treated with
particulates 44h. 28h incubation after
cytochalasin B. Micronuclei frequency
determined.
Extracts produced a dose-dependent increase in
micronuclei. Fine carbon black particles were
consistently less genotoxic at similar test
concentrations. Results indicate that the
chemicals adsorbed onto the particles were the
primary contributors to the observed genotoxic
effects.
July 2009
D-180
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Particle
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Roubicek et
al. (2007,156929)
Species: Human
Cell Line: Lung
adenocarcinomaA549 cell
line
PM (Mexico City from an industrial
area with high-traffic and a medium-
traffic residential area)
(aqueous or organic extracts)
Particle Size: Diameter: 10 //in
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 1.25,1.63,
2.5m3/ml equivalents of PMio
Time to Analysis: Cells treated 24h
followed by 48h incubation with
cytochalasin B. Micronuclei frequency
determined.
Water and organic extracts induced a significant
dose-dependent increase in the micronuclei
frequency. After doses of PM from different
regions were normalized for mass differences,
the genotoxic potency was higher for samples
from the industrial area.
Reference: Salonen et al.
(2004,187053)
Species: Mouse
Cell Line: Macrophage
RAW 264.7
PM (Vallila, Finland; busy traffic site;
sping, winter)
Particle Size: Diameter: <10//m
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 15, 50,150, 500,
1000/yglmL of RPMI
Time to Analysis: Air collected 2-7d
periods. Extracted. Exposed 24h.
PAHs decreased from winter to spring. TNF-a
dose-dependently increased and was higher in
spring samples. IL-6 generally increased in spring
but not in winter. NO dose-dependently
increased and was higher in winter. Cell viability
generally decreased but there were no
consistent potency differences between the
samples. Generally, proinflammatory activity,
cytotoxicity and IL-6 were associated with the
insoluble PM fractions. Polymyxin B inhibited IL-
6 and TNF-a. OH and 8-hydroxy-2'-
deoxyguanosine dose-dependently increased and
were higher in the spring and winter,
respectively.
Reference: Seaton et al. PM (3 busy London underground (LU)
2005
Species: Human
Cell Line: Alveolar
epithelial A549
stations and cabs) (LU dust in PM2.6
samples: iron oxide 64-71%,
chromium 0.1-0.2%, manganese 0.5-
1%, copper < 0.1-0.9%; respirable
dust samples: 1-2%)
Particle Size: Diameter: <2.5//m,
10 /jm, Median diameter: 0.4/ym
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: Stations: 270-
480/yg/m3 PM2.B, 14000-29000
particles/cm3; Cabs: 130-200/yglm3
PM2.6,17000-23000 particles/cm3;
Assays: 1,10, 50,100/yglmL
Time to Analysis: 3d measurements of
LU and cabs. Air collected for lab tests.
Exposed 8, 24h.
PMio caused less LDH release, IL-8 stimulation
and free radical activity than LU dust particles
that contained PM2.6. Chelation had little effect
on PMio soluble components.
Reference: Sevastyanova PMio (Prague, Czech Republic;
et al. (2007,156969)
Species: Human
Cell Line: HepG2 cell line,
embryonic lung diploid
fibroblasts (HEL), or acute
monocytic leukemia cells
(THP-1)
Ko" sice; Slovak Republic; Sofia,
Bulgaria) (urban, summer, winter)
(organic extracts)
Particle Size: Diameter: 10 //m
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 10-100 //gfml
Time to Analysis: Samples collected
24h daily 3m. HepG2 and THP-1 cells
treated for 24h.
DNA adducts were observed in all cell types
evaluated. Highest adduct levels were observed
in HepG2 cells, followed by HEL and THP-1 cells.
A correlation between DNA adduct levels and
carcinogenic PAH content was observed in
HepG2 cells at 50/yg/ml.
Reference: Shi et al.
(2003, 088248)
Species: Human
Cell Line: Epithelial lung
A549
PM (Dusseldorf, Germany, July-Dec.)
Particle Size: Fine diameter: < 2.5
/jm; Coarse diameter: 10-2.5/jm
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: Fine: 0.57-
2.49mg; Coarse: 0.66-1.89mg;
Concentration: 0.57mg/mL
Time to Analysis: Weekly samplings
July-Dec 1999. Electron spin response i
hydrodeoxyguanosine induction,
measurement.
Coarse and fine particles generated OH, but
coarse particles had significantly higher OH
formation as well as 8-hydroxy-2'-
deoxyguanosine formation. 8-hydroxy-2'-
deoxyguanosine and OH had a significant
correlation.
Reference: Skarek et al.
(2007,096814)
Species: Rat
Cell Line: Modified
hepatoma H4IIE.Iuc; SOS:
£ coli PQ37 (±S9)
PM (urban: List! nad Laben, Karvina;
background: Cervenohorske sedlo,
Kosetice - Czech Republic; July)
(organic extracts, TSP) GP (gas
phase)
Particle Size: Diameter: <2.5//m
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: SOS: 8, 4, 2,
1m3
ml ; Dioxin: TSP+GP- 8,1.33, 0.22,
0.04m3 ml'1, PM2.6+GP: 4, 0.66, 0.11,
0.02m3 ml-'
Time to Analysis: 24h samples July
2002. Extracted. SOS chromotest: 22h
incubation. Dioxin toxicity test: 24h
exposure.
The urban areas had a much greater level of
carcinogenic PAHs and overall number of PAHs
than the background areas. Significant
genotoxic activity was only detected at
TSP + GP without S9 from urban areas.
PM2.6+GP had lower dioxin activity at the urban
areas, but similar levels of toxicity were seen for
both treatments in the background areas.
Reference: Song et al.
(2007,155306)
Species: S. typhimurium
Strain: TA98, TA100
Cell Line: Rat fibrocytes
L-929 cells
PM (soluble organic fraction (SOF)
extracts from diesel engines using
fuels blended with ethanol by volume:
EO ¦ base diesel fuel; E5 ¦ 5%; E10 ¦
10%;E15-15%;E20-20%)
Particle Size: Density (g/cm3): EO-
0.8379; E5- 0.8349; E10- 0.8324;
E15- 0.8301; E20- 0.8279
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: Ames Assay:
0.025, 0.05, 0.1 mg/plate; Comet Assay:
0.125, 0.25, 0.5,1.0mg|mL
Time to Analysis: Samples extracted
24h. Ames and comet assays performed
All PM extracts induced higher mutational
response in TA98 (3- to 5-fold increase over
spontaneous) than in TA100 (2-to 3-fold
increase). The highest brake specific revertants
(BSR) ±S9 in both strains occurred with E20
and lowest BSR was in E5 (except in TA98 -
S9). EO and E20 caused more significant DNA
damage (similar in effect) than the other
extracts. Damage was dose-dependent but
variable with increasing ethanol volume.
July 2009
D-181
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Particle
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Ueng et al.
(2005, 097054)
Species: Human
Cell Line: Lung epithelium
CL5 (cancerous),
bronchial epithelial BEAS-
2B (noncancerous), WI-38
normal lung fibroblast
MEP (Yamaha cabin motorcycle 2-
strok 50-cc engine)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 1,10,100, 200
/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: Exhaust collected,
extracted. cDNA microarray analysis.
RT-PCR: 2h. ELISA: 12h incubation.
Centrifuged 24h post-treatment.
Bioactivity: 12h incubation. Centrifuged
24h post-treatment. Medium replaced
48h post-incubation. Fibroblasts
determined 96h post-incubation. Time
response studies: 3-48h treatment.
Concentration response studies: 6h
treatment.
Drug metabolism array study: MEP increased
CYP1A1, CYP3A7 and UGT2B.
Cytokine array study: MEP increased
fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-6, FGF-9, IL-1 a,
IL-22 and vascular endothelial growth factor
(VEGF)-D mRNA.
Oncogene, tumor suppressor, estrogen
signaling pathway: MEP increased fra-1, c-src,
SHC, p21, C0X7RP, and decreased p53 and Rb
expression.
RT-PCR: MEP increased CYP1A1, CYP1B1, IL-6,
IL-11, IL-1 a, FGF-6, FGF-9, VEGF-D, fra-1 and
p21.
Concentration and time responses:
Concentration and time-dependent increases
occurred for FGF-9, IL-1a, IL-6, IL-11, but
decreased time-dependently after 6h exposure.
BEAS-2B Cells: MEP had concentration-
dependent increases on CYP1A1 and CYP1B1
but did not affect anything else.
Peroxide, MEP+NAC, WI-38 Cells: MEP
increased peroxide production. The MEP+NAC
treatment reduced MEP-elevated levels of IL-1 a,
IL-6, FGF-9, VEGF-D to control levels. Fibroblasts
increased in WI-38 cells.
Reference: Umbuzeiro et
al. (2008,190491)
Species: Salmonella
typhimurium
Strain: TA98, YG1041
(+/¦ S9)
PM (urban; Sao Paulo, Brazil-
Cerqueira Cesar street station,
Ibirapuera park station) (winter- June
17,18; average temperature: 16°C)
(E0M)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: Cerqueira Cesar:
UPM- 156/yg/m3, E0M- 57.7mg/total
UPM; Ibirapuera Park: UPM- 32/yg/m3,
E0M- 41.7mgjtotal UPM; Salmonella
assay-0.5,1,5,10, 50,100 UPM
equiv/plate |//g)
Time to Analysis: Tests performed 20d
after collection date. Organic extraction
20h. PAH fractionation.
Salmonellafmicrosome assay.
The TSP and E0M were similar for both sites.
The PAH fraction had very low mutagenicity for
the Cerqueira Cesar sample in the YG1041
strain and no mutagenicity for the Ibirapuera
sample. Nitro-PAH and oxy-PAH had similar
mutagenetic activities from both samples. S9
decreased mutagenicity in nitro-PAH but was
increased in oxy-PAH. DNA adduct levels were
dose-dependent and not different between the
two sites.
Reference: Upadhyay et
al. (2003, 097370)
Species: Human
Cell Line: Alveolar
epithelial A549
PM (Dusseldorf, Germany) (Particles
contain carbon (19.70%),
hydrogen(1.4%),nitrogen (< .05%),
oxygen(14.12%), sulfur (2.09%), ash
(63.24%)) (lonizable metals
concentrations (ppm): Co(103),
Cu(48),Cr(104),Fe(14,521), Mn(21.3),
Ni(1,519),Ti(131), V(2,767)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 1, 5, 25,100
/yg/cm2; 10, 25, 50,100 /yglcm2
Time to Analysis: Air collected. Cells
grown 24h. PM treatments 1, 4, 8,12,
24h.
PM induced dose- and time-dependent reductions
in ds-DNA due to the formation of DNA-SB. The
soluble component caused higher DNA damage.
Apoptosis and DNA fragmentation increased
dose-dependently. nam decreased dose-
dependently in control cells, but not in cells with
Bcl-xl overexpression. PM caused activation of
caspase 9. Pretreatment with iron chelators or a
free radical scavenger reduced PM-induced DNA-
SB formation, DNA fragmentation, caspase 9
activation, and weakened nam reductions.
Reference: Valavanidis et
al. (2005, 096432)
Cell Line: NR
PM (TSP: high volume pumps, Athens;
DEP: 2.0L engine GM Astra; GEP:
1,6L passenger vehicle Ford; Wood
smoke soot: domestic fireplace
exhaust chimney; PMio: high volume
sampling system, Athens; PM2.6: high
volume cascade impactor (Anderson)
system
Particle Size: Diameter: >10.2-
< 0.41 /jm
Route: Incubation
Dose/Concentration: 20, 40mgf5mL
Time to Analysis: PM collected 30min-
1 h or 24h basis. Incubated with H2O2
and 2' deoxyguanosine (dG). Stored 3-7d
at -20°C. Fenton reaction. EPR analysis.
PM generated OH by a Fenton reaction, which
is increased by the addition of EDTA but
inhibited by deferoxamine. PM dose-dependently
induced dG hydroxylation and 8-hydroxy-2'-
deoxyguanosine formation. Transition metals Ni,
V, Co, Cr that are capable of redox cycling
electron producing ROS were found in the PM
samples.
Reference: Xu and Zhang
(2004, 097231) Species:
Human
Cell Line: Lung epithelial
A549
PM (Taiyuan, Beijing; Nov-Feb)
(Taiyuan: coal-fume pollution; Beijing:
coal-fume and vehicle exhaust)
Particle Size: Diameter: 2.5 /jm
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 5, 50, 200//gfmL
Time to Analysis: Air samples
collected. Cells incubated 12-24h. Comet
assay.
Taiyuan had a significantly higher daily PM2.6
average than Beijing. It was shown that the
smaller the particulate diameter, the higher the
concentration of BaP and Pb. A dose- and time-
response relationship was seen in DNA
fragmentation.
July 2009
D-182
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table D-9. Mutagenicity and genotoxicity data summary: in vivo studies.
Reference
Particle
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Abou Chakra
et al. (2007, 098819)
Species: Human
Gender: Male, Female
Age: 6-13yrs and Adults
Participant
Characteristics: Non-
smokers
Cell Line: HeLa S3 cells
PM (3 French metropolitan cities:
Urban PM2.6 and PM10 from
"Residential Sector," "Proximity
Sector," "Industrial Sector'!
(organic extracts)
Particle Size: Diameter: 2.5,10 //m
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 261 PM2.6; 76
PMiosamples
Time to Analysis: Cells incubated with
200; fjL organic extract and 20 /jl
aphidicoline for 24h.
Seasonal variation was observed with genotoxic
effects being greater in winter. PM2.6 was more
active than PM10 extracts. Samples from the
"Proximity Sector" (downtown area with heavy
traffic) exhibited the strongest genotoxic
responses.
Reference: Arrieta et al.
(2003,096210)
Species: Rat
Cell Line: Hepatoma
(H4IIE)
Species: Mouse
Cell Line: Hepatoma
H111.1 c2
PM (El Paso, Texas; Juarez,
Chihuahua, Mexico; Sunland Park,
New Mexico) (organic extracts)
Particle Size: Diameter: 10 //in
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: EROD test: 0.03,
0.17,0.34,0.50, 0.68, 4.96, 9.93
extract equivalents (m3 air); Luciferase:
0.17,0.51,1.26, 5.01 extract
equivalents (m3 air)
Time to Analysis: Extracts incubated
24h. EROD, luciferase activity, PAH
content determined.
EROD activity declined at higher extract
amounts, but luciferase activity was not
inhibited. Cytotoxicity occurred only at extract
equivalents to 0.47 m3air. PAH concentration
increased with PM mass.
Reference: Bao et al.
(2007,097258)
Cell Line: Human-
hamster hybrid (Al)
DEP (organic extracts) (SRM 2975)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 10, 20, 50,100
/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: Phagocytosis
inhibitors: Exposed 24h with or without
cytochalasin B or ammonium chloride.
Cytotoxicity: 24, 48h incubation.
Mutations: Exposed 24h. 5-7d culture.
Incubated additional 7-8d.
The nucleus of DEP-treated cells was condensed
and shrunken compared to controls. DEPs
accumulated in cells, disrupting the
mitochondrial cristae, and were lodged in large
cytoplasmic vacuoles. DEP produced minimal
toxicity. CD59 locus mutations dose-
dependently increased but decreased when
simultaneously treated with cytochalasin B or
ammonium chloride.
Reference: Carvalho-
Oliveria et al. (2005,
077898)
Species: T. pallida, A.
cepa
PM (Sao Paulo, Brazil; spring, bus
strike and non-strike days) (organic
extracts)
Particle Size: Diameter: 2.5 /jm
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: Strike day: 47.32
/yg/m3; Non-strike day: 43.01 /yglm3
Time to Analysis: Air samples from 2d:
bus strike day, bus non-strike day. T.
pallida kept in lab 24h. Exposed 8h. 24h
recovery. Fixed 24h. A. cepa roots
induced 5d. Exposed 30h. Fixed 24h.
Element concentrations, sulfur and BTEX
decreased on the strike day. Micronuclei
decreased in T. pallida during the strike. Toxicity
measured in A. cepa was not significant, but
higher on strike days.
Reference: Dybdahl et al. DEP (SRM 1650)
(2004, 089013) Particle Size: NR
Species: Human
Cell Line: Lung epithelial
A549
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 10, 50,100, 500
/yg DEP/mL
Time to Analysis: DEP suspended,
sonicated. A549 cells diluted. Fresh
medium added after 24h. After 48h
medium removed, DEP added. 2, 5, 24h
incubation.
DEP induced dose-dependent increases of IL-1a,
IL-6, IL-8, TNF-a. The cytokines increased 4-18-
fold at the highest dose. Cell viability did not
decrease. Comet tail length increased at 100
and 500 /yglmL for 2, 5, 24h.
Reference: Gabelova et
al. 2006
Species: Human
Cell Line: Hepatoma Hep
G2
PM (winter, summer) (organic
extracts)
Particle Size: Diameter: 10 //m
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 5,10, 20, 50,
100,150//gfmL
Time to Analysis: 3m sampling periods,
winter, summer. Cells grown 48h.
Exposed 2h. Single cell gel
electrophoresis or cultivated, harvested,
processed 2, 4,16, 24h.
PM, c-PAHs and genotoxicity were higher in
winter air samples than summer. E0M samples
generally had significant dose-dependent
increases in DNA migration. Repair-specific DNA
endonucleases did not increase DNA migration.
8-oxodG was below the steady-state level in
EOM samples.
Reference: Gabelova et
al. 2007
Species: Human
Cell Line: Hepatoma Hep
G2
PM (PRG-SM, PRG-LB, Kosice, Sofia;
winter, summer) (organic extracts)
Particle Size: Diameter: 10 //m
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 5-150/yglmL
Time to Analysis: Air samples collected
24h intervals, 3m sampling period. Cells
grown 48h. Exposed 2h. 24, 48h
preliminary experiments. Single cell gel
electrophoresis.
Cell viability significantly decreased in the 24,
48h exposure groups compared to the 2h
exposure group. DNA migration significantly
dose-dependently increased at most
concentrations. In general, oxidative DNA
damage did not significantly increase.
July 2009
D-183
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Particle
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Gabelova et
al. 2007
Species: Human
Cell Line: Hepatoma Hep
G2 cell line
PMio (Prague (Czech Republic),
Ko'sice (Slovak Republic) and Sofia
(Bulgaria); urban, winter, summer)
(organic extracts)
Particle Size: Diameter: 10 //in
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 5 to 150/yglml
EOM from 50/yglml stock solution
Time to Analysis: 24h DNA adduct
formation. 2h Comet assay. Oxidative
DNA damage measured by Fpg-sensitive
sites.
Total DNA adducts ranged from ~ 60 to 200
adducts per 10s nucleotides. Extracts also
produced approximately the same levels of
strand breaks. Results suggested that the
genotoxic potential of ambient air was at least
6-fold greater in the winter compared to
summer. No substantial difference was reported
for oxidative DNA damage induced by summer
vs. winter samples.
Reference: Gong et al.
(2007,091155)
Species: Human
Cell Line: Microvascular
endothelial (HMEC)
DEP (aggregates, exhaust 4JBi-type
LD,274 1,4-cylinder Isuzu diesel
engine, 10 torque load, cyclone
impactor, dilution tunnel constant
volume sampler)
Particle Size: Diameter: < 1 /ym
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 5,15, 25/yglmL
Time to Analysis: Cells treated with
DEP, ox-PAPC (oxidized 1 -palmitoyl-2-
arachidonyl-OT-glycero-3-
phosphorylchlorine), DEP+ox-PAPC.
Analytical tests performed.
H0-1 expression was dose-dependent and
greatest with the DEP+ox-PAPC treatment. DEP
significantly dose-dependently upregulated or
downregulated a number of genes and was
shown to have a synergistic effect with co-
treatment of ox-PAPC. The most varying genes
were significantly enriched for EpRE,
inflammatory response, UPR, immune response,
cell adhesion, lipid metabolism, apoptosis and
protein folding genes.
Reference: Greenwell et
al. (2003, 097478)
Species: Rat
Cell Line: Epithelial fluid;
icosahedral bacteriophage
cpX174-RF DNA
PM (South Wales, UK) (urban,
industrial)
Particle Size: Coarse diameter: 10-
2.5 fjm, Fine diameter: 2.5-0.1 /ym
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: Urban mean: 18.7
± 4.7mg/day; Industrial mean: 22.6 ±
2.5mg/day
Time to Analysis: 24h air samples 4-
11 d. Substrates vortexed 1 h, suspended
4h, centrifuged 1h. Oxidation assay.
Industrial PM was more bioreactive than urban
PM. Coarse fractions had greater oxidative
potential and bioreactivity than fine fractions.
Reference: Gu et al.
2005
Species: Hamster
Strain: Chinese
Cell Line: Lung fibroblast
(V79)
DPM (1980 model General Motors
5.7-L V-8 engine)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 25, 50,100,150
/yglmL; 10 /yg DPM in 10 /yg in
DPPCImL; 10 /yg DPM in 10 /yg
DMSO/mL
Time to Analysis: Chromosomal
aberration: 24h incubation. Treated 24h.
Incubated again 24h. MN assay: 24h
treatment. Gene mutation: 24h
treatment. Cells replated. 7d expression
times. Staining at 8,10d.
DPM significantly and dose-dependently
increased aberrant cells at 25-100/yglmL. DPM
increased MN formation dose-dependently.
Mutant frequencies were not significant and
showed no dose-dependent trends. DPM was
toxic to cells at the highest concentration.
Reference: Gualtieri et
al. (2005, 097841)
Species: Human
Cell Line: Alveolar lung
(A549)
TD (Tire debris, generated by rotating
new vehicle wheel against a steel
brush, significant component of PMio)
(organic extracts)
Particle Size: Diameter: 10-80 /ym
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 50, 60, 75/yglmL
Time to Analysis: Particles extracted
6h. Cells subcultured every 3-4d. After
24h, TD treatments 24,48, 72h.
A time- and dose-dependent inhibitory effect on
the reduction of MTT was seen. Mortality
increased dose-dependently and was
significantly greater than the controls. DNA
strand breaks increased significantly in a dose-
dependent manner. A significant cell cycle block
in the G1 phase with a consequent decrease in
the cell number in the S and G2/M phases was
seen. Exposed cells had a modified morphology.
Reference: Gutierrez-
Castillo et al. (2006,
089030)
Species: Human
Cell Line: A549 type II
alveolar epithelial cells
PM2.6 and PMio(4 monitoring stations
in Mexico City: (1) downtown high
auto traffic, (2) two industrial areas
with high levels of auto traffic and
low vegetation, (3) medium-traffic
residential area) (winter, spring , 4
sampling days in each period)
(aqueous and organic extracts)
Particle Size: Diameter: 2.5 or 10
/ym
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 0.05, 0.07,
0.1 m3|ml equivalents PM2.6; 0.82,1.25,
1.63m3/ml equivalents PMio
Time to Analysis: Cells treated 48h
with water-soluble or organic-soluble PM
extracts.
Higher amounts of water-soluble metals were
found in samples collected during winter. Water-
soluble extracts increased DNA damage 1.7-fold
over the background. Similar results were
observed with organic extracts. In general, PM2.6
extracts had greater genotoxic potential than
PMio extracts, and water soluble fractions form
both particle sizes were more genotoxic than the
corresponding organic extracts.
Reference: Izawa H et al.
(2007,190387)
Cell Line: NA
DEPE (4JB-1 Isuzu 4-cylinder direct-
injection 2740cc diesel engine;
1500rpm, 10kg/m load)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: DEP: Ah-1
experiment- 111, 55.5, 27.8,13.9, 6.9,
3.5,1.7/yglmL; Foods, polyphenols
experiment- 27.8/yglmL
Time to Analysis: DEPE incubated 2h
for dioxin toxicity measurement.
Absorbance at 405nm measured. Food,
polyphenol inhibitory effects: food
extract or polyphenol solution added to
cytosol solution, shaken 5min. DEPE
added, shaken 5min. 2h incubation.
Absorbance at 405nm measured.
The dioxin toxicity equivalent was 6,479±58ng
DEQ/g of DEP. The absorbance showed a
sigmoid curve and dose-dependently increased
from 6.9 to 27.8/yg DEPImL. The Ginkgobiloba
extract significantly inhibited AhR activation
significantly more than the other foods, and was
followed by green tea, onions, and garlic,
~uercetin and myricetin dose-dependently
inhibited AhR activation. Ginkgolides A and B
had weak inhibitory effects and resveratol was
the weakest.
July 2009
D-184
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Particle
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Jacobsen et
al. (2008,156597)
Species: Mouse
Cell Line: FEI Muta™
lung epithelial cells
DEP (SRM 1650b)
Carbon black (CB) (Printex 90)
Particle Size: DEP: 18-30nm; CB:
14nm; Agglomerates in suspensions:
DEP Peaks- 249nm, CB Peaks-
476nm
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 37.5, 75/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: 8 repeated 72h
incubations.
Mutagenicity: The 75/yg/mL dose was
significantly increased compared to the 37.5
/yg/mL dose. Linear regression showed a
significant increasing trend by increasing
exposure. There was no change in the total cell
numbers.
ROS: ROS production increased in DEP-treated
cells after 3h of exposure. CB-treated cells
showed a dose-dependent increase.
Reference: Karlsson et
al. 2004
Species: Human
Cell Line: Fibroblasts;
calf thymus DNA with
human liver microsomes
or rat liver S9
PM (urban dust particles, SRM 1649)
(extracted with DCM, acetone,
DMSO, water) (Fe 3% w/w, Ti 0.32%
w/w, V 0.04% w/w, Mn 0.03% w/w,
Cu 0.025% w/w)
Particle Size: Mean diameter: < 10
/jm
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 0.1,1.0,10,100
/yg/cm2
Time to Analysis: Particles extracted.
Fibroblasts exposed 24h. Comet assay.
Calf thymus incubated 2h with
microsomes or S9.32P-labelled.
DNA damage increased dose-dependently, and a
significant amount of DNA-damaged cells had
particle interactions. DNA damage induced by
the insoluble particle core significantly increased
after each extraction. Native particles were
more genotoxic than those extracted with
DMSO, DCM and water, but not with acetone or
hexane. DMSO extracts had the most adduct-
forming PACs, and water extracts had the most
oxidizing substances.
Reference: Karlsson et
al. (2005, 086392)
Species: Human
Cell Line: Lung epithelial
A549 type II
PM (subway station, urban street)
Subway particles: O2, Fe (Fe from
Fe304) Street particles: Fe from Fe203
Particle Size: Diameter: 10 //in
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: Comet: 5,10, 20,
40/yg/cm2; 8-oxodG: 10/yg/cm2
Time to Analysis: Air sampled 24h
daily. Cells grown 24h. Exposed 4h.
Both PM types induced concentration-dependent
DNA damage, but subway particles were more
potent. Subway particles caused more 8-oxodG
formation and oxidation of dG, the latter of
which was inhibited by deferoxaminemesylate.
Oxidation from subway particles was due to
nonsoluble, redox active substances, and soluble
substances from street particles.
Reference: Karlsson et
al. (2006,156625)
Species: Human
Cell Line: Lung epithelium
A549; monocytes from
heparinized whole blood
PM (wood- old, modern boiler; pellets-
pellets burner, electrical ignition; tire-
road simulator studded, friction tires;
Street- busy street, Stockholm;
Subway- platform near street)
Particle Size: Diameter: 2.5,10/ym
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 40/yg/cm2
Time to Analysis: Samples collected.
Blank filter and Teflon filters used. Cells
grown 24h. Comet assay. Monocytes
incubated 10d. Macrophages incubated
18h.
All particles tested caused DNA damage, but
there was no significant difference between the
size fractions. Subway particles were the most
genotoxic. The urban street particles were the
most potent inducers of the cytokines. On the
Teflon filters, PMiowas somewhat more potent
than PM2.6.
Reference: Kubatova et
al. (2004, 087986)
Species: Monkey
Cell Line: African green
kidney COS-1 (CV-1 cells
with origin-defective
SV40 mutants); (±S9)
PM (DE from diesel bus, wood smoke
(WS) from chimney, hardwood smoke)
(organic extracts)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 25, 50,100, 200
/yg/mL; 50mg of each material used for
all experiments
Time to Analysis: DE and WS collected.
Extracted. 24h cytotoxicity. 2h SOS
chromotest.
WS had significantly increased cytotoxicity in
fractions of 25-250°C, and DE in nonpolar
fractions of 250 and 300°C and polar fractions
of 50°C. The cytotoxicity of DE PM nonpolar
fractions corresponded to increased
concentrations of PAHs. WS was not genotoxic
and DE was genotoxic in midpolarity fractions
(50-250°C). Genotoxic response was not
increased after S9 activation.
Reference: Landvik et al.
(2007,096722)
Species: Mouse
Cell Line: Hepatoma
Hepa1c1c7 cells
DEP extracts (DEPE in the paper)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 10, 20, 30, 50,
70/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: Cells exposed 24h.
DNA fragmentation assay.
50 and 70/yg/mL DEPE did not induce DNA
fragmentation but did cleave caspase 3 to a
minor extent.
Reference: Mehta et al.
(2008,190440)
Species: Human
Cell Line: Lung
adenocarcinoma (A549)
PM (SRM 1949a)
Particle Size: Diameter: ~ 0.18/ym
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 0, 50,100, 200,
400/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: Cell culture and cell
viability assay: PM treatment 24h. 10d
incubation. Host cell reactivation assay:
pGL3-luciferase plasmid UV irradiated
20min. PM treatment 24h. 16h
transfection. 24h PM incubation. DNA
repair synthesis assay: PM treatment
24h. Proteinase K treatment 30min. supf
mutagenesis assay: PM treatment 24h.
PM culture 60h. DNA extracted.
Overnight incubation of transformed
bacteria.
PM reduced colony-forming ability and repair
synthesis capacity was proportional to the PM
concentration. PM dose-dependently decreased
HCR capacity and decreased more than TSP. PM
induced cyclobutane dimmers and
pyrimidine < 6-4 > pyrimidones mutations in UV-
irradiated supf.
July 2009
D-185
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Particle
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Meng et al.
2007
Species: Rat
Gender: Male
Strain: Wistar
Age: NR
Weight: Mean: 230g;
Range: 200-250g
Cell Line: AMs from
treated rats
PM (Baotou, Wuwei, China) (normal Route: Cell Culture
weather, dust storms, Mar 1-31)
(organic extracts, water soluble
fractions)
Particle Size: 2.5 //m
Dose/Concentration: AM: 0, 33.3,
100, 300//g/mL; Water-soluble: 0, 75,
150, 300//g/mL; Organic extracts: 0,
25, 50,100 //g/mL; Mass concentration
normal day: 68.49±28.83//g/m3; Mass
concentration dust storm day:
221.83 ± 69.89 //g/m3
Time to Analysis: Samples collected
24h after 5pm. Extracted. Rats instilled
24h. Killed, lavaged. Cultures 4h.
0C, NH4+, NO3' were higher in normal weather
PM2.6. SO42', Ca2+were higher in dust storm
PM2.6. Fe, Al, Ca, Mg were 5x higher in dust
storm PM2.E. Cell viability reduced in a
concentration-dependent manner, with normal
weather being slightly more cytotoxic. DNA
damage was dose-dependently induced, with
normal weather and organic extracts showing
the greatest damage.
ference: Motta et al.
2004
Species: Hamster
Strain: Chinese
Cell Line: Epithelial liver,
ovary
PM (Catania, Sicily; spring) (organic
extracts)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 0.60,1.21, 2.42,
4.85,9.70,19.40//g/mL; 0.78,1.56,
2.12, 6.25,12.50, 25.00//g/mL
Time to Analysis: 2, 3h air sampling.
Extracts 4h. 24h treatment.
The treatment was only slightly cytotoxic at the
highest dose. DNA damage and aberrant cells
generally increased with dose. No effect was
seen in the Chinese hamster ovary cells without
metabolic activation.
Reference: Oh and Chung Crude extract (CE) DEP and fractions
(2006, 088296)
Cell Line: A549 (Comet),
CH0-K1 (CBMN), H4IIE
(EROD-microbiassay)
of CE of DEP (organic extracts: F1 ¦
organic bases, F2 - organic acids, F3
- aliphatic, F4 - aromatic, F5 ¦
slightly polar, F6 -moderately polar,
F7 ¦ high polar)
Particle Size: Diameter: <2.5//m,
87.71%, 2.5-10//m, 3.87%, >10
//m, 8.42%
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 100 //g/mL
Time to Analysis: DEP generated,
extracted. Comet assay- 24h incubation,
CE, DEP exposed 24h. MN assay-
cultured 24h, 4h treatment, growth
medium incubation 20h. EROD-
microbioassay- 48h.
DNA damage: CE significantly increased the
amount of DNA damage in A549 cells with and
without SKF-525A, a CYP450 inhibitor, and in
CH0-K1 cells. It significantly increased MN
formation ±S9 compared to controls.
Organic Extracts: Organic base (F1) and
neutral (F3-F7) fractions of CE of DEP
significantly induced DNA damage without SKF-
525A compared to controls. Adding SKF-525A
completely inhibited damage caused by F3, F4,
F6 and F7 but kept the effect of F1 similar to
that without SKF and only partially inhibited
that of F5. F2 did not induce DNA damage with
or without SKF. All fractions except F6 induced
MN formation ±S9.
Reference: Poma et al.
(2006, 096903)
Species: Mouse
Cell Line: Macrophage
RAW 264.7
PM (L'Aquila, Italy; urban) Route: Cell Culture
Carbon black (CB) Dose/Concentration: 1, 3,10//g/cm2
Particle Size: Diameter: 2.1-0.43 //m Time to Analysis: Air samples collected
weekly basis Jan-Mar 2004. Cells
cultured 48h. Treatment 48h. MN assay: equally-weighted CB.
44h incubation, 28h incubation.
PM and CB dose-dependently reduced cell
proliferation and induced micronuclei. PM and
CB also reduced cellular metabolism of the
macrophages and induced significant amounts of
apoptosis. PM produced more micronuclei than
Reference: Poma et al.
2006
Species: Mouse
Cell Line: RAW 264.7
macrophage
PM (urban, winter)
Particle Size: Diameter: 2.5 //m
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 2.2, 6.6, 22
//g/mL
Time to Analysis: Cells treated with
particulates 44h. 28h incubation after
cytochalasin B. Micronuclei frequency
determined.
Extracts produced a dose-dependent increase in
micronuclei. Fine carbon black particles were
consistently less genotoxic at similar test
concentrations. Results indicate that the
chemicals adsorbed onto the particles were the
primary contributors to the observed genotoxic
effects.
Reference: Roubicek et
al. (2007,156929)
Species: Human
Cell Line: Lung
adenocarcinomaA549 cell
line
PM (Mexico City from an industrial
area with high-traffic and a medium-
traffic residential area)
(aqueous or organic extracts)
Particle Size: Diameter: 10 //in
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 1.25,1.63,
2.5m3|ml equivalents of PM10
Time to Analysis: Cells treated 24h
followed by 48h incubation with
cytochalasin B. Micronuclei frequency
determined.
Water and organic extracts induced a significant
dose-dependent increase in the micronuclei
frequency. After doses of PM from different
regions were normalized for mass differences,
the genotoxic potency was higher for samples
from the industrial area.
Reference: Salonen et al.
(2004,187053)
Species: Mouse
Cell Line: Macrophage
RAW 264.7
PM (Vallila, Finland; busy traffic site;
sping, winter)
Particle Size: Diameter: <10//m
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 15, 50,150, 500,
1000//g/mL of RPMI
Time to Analysis: Air collected 2-7d
periods. Extracted. Exposed 24h.
PAHs decreased from winter to spring. TNF-a
dose-dependently increased and was higher in
spring samples. IL-6 generally increased in spring
but not in winter. NO dose-dependently
increased and was higher in winter. Cell viability
generally decreased but there were no
consistent potency differences between the
samples. Generally, proinflammatory activity,
cytotoxicity and IL-6 were associated with the
insoluble PM fractions. Polymyxin B inhibited IL-
6 and TNF-a. OH and 8-hydroxy-2'-
deoxyguanosine dose-dependently increased and
were higher in the spring and winter,
respectively.
July 2009
D-186
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Particle
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Seaton et al.
2005
Species: Human
Cell Line: Alveolar
epithelial A549
PM (3 busy London underground (LU)
stations and cabs) (LU dust in PM2.6
samples: iron oxide 64-71%,
chromium 0.1-0.2%, manganese 0.5-
1%, copper < 0.1-0.9%; respirable
dust samples: 1-2%)
Particle Size: Diameter: <2.5//m,
10 /jm, Median diameter: 0.4/ym
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: Stations: 270-
480/yg/m3 PM2.B, 14000-29000
particles/cm3: Cabs: 130-200//g|m3
PM2.6,17000-23000 particles/cm3:
Assays: 1,10, 50,100/yglmL
Time to Analysis: 3d measurements of
LU and cabs. Air collected for lab tests.
Exposed 8, 24h.
PM10 caused less LDH release, IL-8 stimulation
and free radical activity than LU dust particles
that contained PM2.6. Chelation had little effect
on PM10 soluble components.
Reference: Sevastyanova
et al. (2007,156969)
Species: Human
Cell Line: HepG2 cell line,
embryonic lung diploid
fibroblasts (HEL), or acute
monocytic leukemia cells
(THP-1)
PM10 (Prague, Czech Republic:
Ko'sice; Slovak Republic: Sofia,
Bulgaria) (urban, summer, winter)
(organic extracts)
Particle Size: Diameter: 10 //in
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 10-100 //gfml
Time to Analysis: Samples collected
24h daily 3m. HepG2 and THP-1 cells
treated for 24h.
DNA adducts were observed in all cell types
evaluated. Highest adduct levels were observed
in HepG2 cells, followed by HEL and THP-1 cells.
A correlation between DNA adduct levels and
carcinogenic PAH content was observed in
HepG2 cells at 50/yg/ml.
Reference: Shi et al.
(2003, 088248)
Species: Human
Cell Line: Epithelial lung
A549
PM (Dusseldorf, Germany, July-Dec.)
Particle Size: Fine diameter: < 2.5
/jm; Coarse diameter: 10-2.5/jm
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: Fine: 0.57-
2.49mg: Coarse: 0.66-1.89mg:
Concentration: 0.57mg/mL
Time to Analysis: Weekly samplings
July-Dec 1999. Electron spin response 8-
hydrodeoxyguanosine induction,
measurement.
Coarse and fine particles generated OH, but
coarse particles had significantly higher OH
formation as well as 8-hydroxy-2'-
deoxyguanosine formation. 8-hydroxy-2'-
deoxyguanosine and OH had a significant
correlation.
Reference: Skarek et al.
(2007,096814)
Species: Rat
Cell Line: Modified
hepatoma H4IIE.Iuc; SOS:
£ coli PQ37 (±S9)
PM (urban: List! nad Laben, Karvina;
background: Cervenohorske sedlo,
Kosetice - Czech Republic: July)
(organic extracts, TSP) GP (gas
phase)
Particle Size: Diameter: <2.5//m
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: SOS: 8, 4, 2,1m3
ml1; Dioxin: TSP+GP- 8,1.33, 0.22,
0.04m3 ml'1, PM2.6+GP: 4, 0.66, 0.11,
0.02m3 ml-'
Time to Analysis: 24h samples July
2002. Extracted. SOS chromotest: 22h
incubation. Dioxin toxicity test: 24h
exposure.
The urban areas had a much greater level of
carcinogenic PAHs and overall number of PAHs
than the background areas. Significant
genotoxic activity was only detected at
TSP + GP without S9 from urban areas.
PM2.6+GP had lower dioxin activity at the urban
areas, but similar levels of toxicity were seen for
both treatments in the background areas.
Reference: Song et al.
(2007,155306)
Species: S. typhimurium
Strain: TA98, TA100
Cell Line: Rat fibrocytes
L-929 cells
PM (soluble organic fraction (SOF)
extracts from diesel engines using
fuels blended with ethanol by volume:
EO ¦ base diesel fuel: E5 ¦ 5%: E10 ¦
10%;E15-15%;E20-20%)
Particle Size: Density (gfcm3): EO-
0.8379; E5- 0.8349; E10- 0.8324;
E15- 0.8301; E20- 0.8279
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: Ames Assay:
0.025, 0.05, 0.1 mg/plate; Comet Assay:
0.125, 0.25, 0.5,1.0mg|mL
Time to Analysis: Samples extracted
24h. Ames and comet assays performed
All PM extracts induced higher mutational
response in TA98 (3- to 5-fold increase over
spontaneous) than in TA100 (2-to 3-fold
increase). The highest brake specific revertants
(BSR) ±S9 in both strains occurred with E20
and lowest BSR was in E5 (except in TA98 -
S9). EO and E20 caused more significant DNA
damage (similar in effect) than the other
extracts. Damage was dose-dependent but
variable with increasing ethanol volume.
Reference: Ueng et al.
(2005, 097054)
Species: Human
Cell Line: Lung epithelium
CL5 (cancerous),
bronchial epithelial BEAS-
2B (noncancerous), WI-38
normal lung fibroblast
MEP (Yamaha cabin motorcycle 2-
strok 50-cc engine)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 1,10,100, 200
/yg/mL
Time to Analysis: Exhaust collected,
extracted. cDNA microarray analysis.
RT-PCR: 2h. ELISA: 12h incubation.
Centrifuged 24h post-treatment.
Bioactivity: 12h incubation. Centrifuged
24h post-treatment. Medium replaced
48h post-incubation. Fibroblasts
determined 96h post-incubation. Time
response studies: 3-48h treatment.
Concentration response studies: 6h
treatment.
Drug metabolism array study: MEP increased
CYP1A1, CYP3A7 and UGT2B.
Cytokine array study: MEP increased
fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-6, FGF-9, IL-1 a,
IL-22 and vascular endothelial growth factor
(VEGF)-D mRNA.
Oncogene, tumor suppressor, estrogen
signaling pathway: MEP increased fra-1, c-src,
SHC, p21, C0X7RP, and decreased p53 and Rb
expression.
RT-PCR: MEP increased CYP1A1, CYP1B1, IL-6,
IL-11, IL-1 a, FGF-6, FGF-9, VEGF-D, fra-1 and
p21.
Concentration and time responses:
Concentration and time-dependent increases
occurred for FGF-9, IL-1a, IL-6, IL-11, but
decreased time-dependently after 6h exposure.
BEAS-2B Cells: MEP had concentration-
dependent increases on CYP1A1 and CYP1B1
but did not affect anything else.
Peroxide, MEP+NAC, WI-38 Cells: MEP
increased peroxide production. The MEP+NAC
treatment reduced MEP-elevated levels of IL-1 a,
IL-6, FGF-9, VEGF-D to control levels. Fibroblasts
increased in WI-38 cells.
July 2009
D-187
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Particle
Exposure
Effects
Reference: Umbuzeiro et
al. (2008,190491)
Species: Salmonella
typhimurium
Strain: TA98, YG1041
(+/¦ S9)
PM (urban; Sao Paulo, Brazil-
Cerqueira Cesar street station,
Ibirapuera park station) (winter- June
17,18; average temperature: 16°C)
(EOM)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: Cerqueira Cesar:
UPM- 156/yg/m3, EOM- 57.7mg/total
UPM; Ibirapuera Park: UPM- 32/yg/m3,
EOM- 41.7mg/total UPM; Salmonella
assay-0.5,1,5,10, 50,100 UPM
equiv/plate |//g)
Time to Analysis: Tests performed 20d
after collection date. Organic extraction
20h. PAH fractionation.
Salmonellafmicrosome assay.
The TSP and EOM were similar for both sites.
The PAH fraction had very low mutagenicity for
the Cerqueira Cesar sample in the YG1041
strain and no mutagenicity for the Ibirapuera
sample. Nitro-PAH and oxy-PAH had similar
mutagenetic activities from both samples. S9
decreased mutagenicity in nitro-PAH but was
increased in oxy-PAH. DNA adduct levels were
dose-dependent and not different between the
two sites.
Reference: Upadhyay et
al. (2003, 097370)
Species: Human
Cell Line: Alveolar
epithelial A549
PM (Dusseldorf, Germany) (Particles
contain carbon (19.70%),
hydrogen(1.4%),nitrogen (< .05%),
oxygen(14.12%), sulfur (2.09%), ash
(63.24%)) (lonizable metals
concentrations (ppm): Co(103),
Cu(48),Cr(104),Fe(14,521), Mn(21.3),
Ni(1,519),Ti(131), V(2,767)
Particle Size: NR
Route: Cell Culture
Dose/Concentration: 1, 5, 25,100
/yg/cm2; 10, 25, 50,100 /yglcm2
Time to Analysis: Air collected. Cells
grown 24h. PM treatments 1, 4, 8,12,
24h.
PM induced dose- and time-dependent reductions
in ds-DNA due to the formation of DNA-SB. The
soluble component caused higher DNA damage.
Apoptosis and DNA fragmentation increased
dose-dependently. decreased dose-
dependently in control cells, but not in cells with
Bcl-xl overexpression. PM caused activation of
caspase 9. Pretreatment with iron chelators or a
free radical scavenger reduced PM-induced DNA-
SB formation, DNA fragmentation, caspase 9
activation, and weakened AH^m reductions.
Reference: Valavanidis et PM (TSP: high volume pumps, Athens;
al. (2005, 096432)
Cell Line: NR
DEP: 2.0L engine GM Astra; GEP:
1,6L passenger vehicle Ford; Wood
smoke soot: domestic fireplace
exhaust chimney; PMio: high volume
sampling system, Athens; PM2.6: high
volume cascade impactor (Anderson)
system
Particle Size: Diameter: >10.2-
< 0.41 /jm
Route: Incubation
Dose/Concentration: 20, 40mg|5mL
Time to Analysis: PM collected 30min-
1 h or 24h basis. Incubated with H2O2
and 2' deoxyguanosine (dG). Stored 3-7d
at -20°C. Fenton reaction. EPR analysis.
PM generated OH by a Fenton reaction, which
is increased by the addition of EDTA but
inhibited by deferoxamine. PM dose-dependently
induced dG hydroxylation and 8-hydroxy-2'-
deoxyguanosine formation. Transition metals Ni,
V, Co, Cr that are capable of redox cycling
electron producing ROS were found in the PM
samples.
Reference: Xu and Zhang
(2004, 097231) Species:
Human
Cell Line: Lung epithelial
A549
PM (Taiyuan, Beijing; Nov-Feb)
(Taiyuan: coal-fume pollution; Beijing:
coal-fume and vehicle exhaust)
Particle Size: Diameter: 2.5 /jm
Route: Cell Culture Taiyuan had a significantly higher daily PM2.6
Dose/Concentration: 5, 50, 200/yg/mL avera8e !han Beiiin9- H™38 show" thuatuthe u
smaller the particulate diameter, the higher the
Time to Analysis: Air samples concentration of BaP and Pb. A dose- and time-
collected. Cells incubated 12-24h. Comet response relationship was seen in DNA
assaV- fragmentation.
July 2009
D-188
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Annex D References
Aam BBi Fonnum F. (2007). ROS scavenging effects of organic extract of diesel exhaust particles on
human neutrophil granulocytes and rat alveolar macrophages. Toxicology, 230- 207-18. 155123
Abou Chakra OR; Joyeux Mi Nerriere Ei Strub MPi Zmirou-Navier D. (2007). Genotoxicity of organic
extracts of urban airborne particulate matter- an assessment within a personal exposure study.
Chemosphere, 66: 1375-81. 098819
Adamson IYRi Vincent Ri Bakowska J. (2003). Differential production of metalloproteinases after
instilling various urban air particle samples to rat lung. , 29: 375-388. 087943
Agopyan Ni Head Ji Yu Si Simon SA. (2004). TRPV1 receptors mediate particulate matter-induced
apoptosis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, 286: 563-572. 156198
Agopyan Ni Li Li Yu Si Simon SA. (2003). Negatively charged 2" and 10-"mu"m particles activate
vanilloid receptors, increase cAMP, and induce cytokine release. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 186:
63-76. 056065
Ahn E-Ki Yoon H-Ki Jee Bo Ki Ko H-Ji Lee K-Hi Kim Hyung Ji Lim Y. (2008). COX-2 expression and
inflammatory effects by diesel exhaust particles in vitro and in vivo. Toxicol Lett, 176: 178-187.
156199
Ahsan MKi Nakamura Hi Tanito Mi Yamada Ki Utsumi Hi Yodoi J. (2005). Thioredoxin-1 suppresses
lung injury and apoptosis induced by diesel exhaust particles (DEP) by scavenging reactive
oxygen species and by inhibiting DEP-induced downregulation of Akt. Free Radic Biol Med, 39:
1549-1559. 156200
Alfaro-Moreno Ei Martinez Li Garcia-Cuellar Ci Bonner JCi Murray JCi Rosas Ii Rosales SPi Osornio-
Vargas AR. (2002). Biologic effects induced in vitro by PM10 from three different zones of Mexico
City. Environ Health Perspect, 110: 715-720. 156204
Amakawa Ki Terashima Ti Matsuzaki Ti Matsumaru Ai Sagai Mi Yamaguchi K. (2003). Suppressive
effects of diesel exhaust particles on cytokine release from human and murine alveolar
macrophages. , 29: 149-164. 156211
Amara Ni Bachoual Ri Desmard Mi Golda Si Guichard Ci Lanone Si Aubier Mi Ogier-Denis Ei
Boczkowski J. (2007). Diesel exhaust particles induce matrix metalloprotease-1 in human lung
epithelial cells via a NADP(H) oxidase/NOX4 redox-dependent mechanism. Am J Physiol Lung
Cell Mol Physiol, 293: L170-181. 156212
Andre Ei Stoeger Ti Takenaka Si Bahnweg Mi Ritter Bi Karg Ei Lentner Bi Reinhard Ci Schulz Hi Wjst
M. (2006). Inhalation of ultrafine carbon particles triggers biphasic pro-inflammatory response
in the mouse lung. Eur Respir J, 28: 275-285. 091376
Anselme Fi Loriot Si Henry J-Pi Dionnet Fi Napoleoni J-Gi Thnillez Ci Morin J-P. (2007). Inhalation of
diluted diesel engine emission impacts heart rate variability and arrhythmia occurrence in a rat
model of chronic ischemic heart failure. , 81: 299-307. 097084
Anseth JWi Goffin AJi Fuller GGi Ghio AJi Kao PNi Upadhyay D. (2005). Lung surfactant gelation
induced by epithelial cells exposed to air pollution or oxidative stress. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol,
33: 161-168. 088646
Antonini JMi Taylor MDi Leonard SSi Lawryk NJi Shi Xi Clarke RWi Roberts JR. (2004). Metal
composition and solubility determine lung toxicity induced by residual oil fly ash collected from
different sites within a power plant. Mol Cell Biochem, 255: 257-265. 097199
Apicella Ci Custidiano Ai Miranda Si Novoa Li Dokmetjian Ji Gentile T. (2006). Differential
macrophage modulation of asymmetric IgG antibody synthesis by soluble or particulate stimuli.
, 103: 177-185. 096586
Arantes-Costa Fi Lopes Fi Toledo Ai Magliarelli-Filho Pi Moriya Hi Carvalho-Oliveira Ri Mauad Ti
Saldiva Pi Martins M. (2008). Effects of residual oil fly ash (ROFA) in mice with chronic allergic
pulmonary inflammation. Toxicol Pathol, 36: 680. 187137
Araujo JAi Barajas Bi KLeinman Mi Wang Xi Bennett BJi Gong KWi Navab Mi Harkema Ji Sioutas Ci
Lusis AJi Nel AE. (2008). Ambient particulate pollutants in the ultrafine range promote early
atherosclerosis and systemic oxidative stress. Circ Res, 102: 589-596. 156222
Archer AJi Cramton JLi Pfau JCi Colasurdo Gi Holian A. (2004). Airway responsiveness after acute
exposure to urban particulate matter 1648 in a DO1110 murine model. Am J Physiol, 286: L337"
L343. 088097
July 2009
D-189
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Arimoto Ti Takano H; Inoue Ki Yanagisawa R; Yoshino Si Yamaki Ki Yoshikawa T. (2007). Pulmonary
exposure to diesel exhaust particle components enhances circulatory chemokines during lung
inflammation. , 20- 197-201. 097973
Arrieta DEi Ontiveros CCi Li W"Wi Garcia JHi Denison MSi McDonald JDi Burchiel SWi Washburn
BS. (2003). Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated activity of particulate organic matter from the
Paso del Norte airshed along the US-Mexico border. ,111- 1299-1305. 096210
Auger Fi Gendron MCi Chamot C> Marano F> Dazy AC. (2006). Responses of well-differentiated nasal
epithelial cells exposed to particles' role of the epithelium in airway inflammation. Toxicol Appl
Pharmacol, 215: 285-294. 156235
Bachoual R; Boczkowski J, Goven Di Amara N> Tabet Li On Di Lecon-Malas V; Aubier Mi Lanone S.
(2007). Biological effects of particles from the paris subway system. , 20: 1426-1433. 155667
Bagate Ki Meiring JJ; Cassee FR; Borm PJA. (2004). The effect of particulate matter on resistance and
conductance vessels in the rat. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 431-436. 055638
Bagate Ki Meiring JJ; Gerlofs-Nijland ME; Cassee FR; Borm PJA. (2006). Signal transduction
pathways involved in particulate matter induced relaxation in rat aorta--spontaneous
hypertensive versus Wistar Kyoto rats. Toxicol In Vitro, 20: 52"62. 097608
Bagate K> Meiring JJ; Gerlofs-Nijland ME; Cassee FR; Wiegand H; Osornio-Vargas A; Borm PJA.
(2006). Ambient particulate matter affects cardiac recovery in a Langendorff ischemia model. ,
18: 633-643. 096157
Bao L; Chen S; Wu L; Hei Tom K; Wu Y; Yu Z; Xu A. (2007). Mutagenicity of diesel exhaust particles
mediated by cell-particle interaction in mammalian cells. Toxicol Sci, 229: 91-100. 097258
Barrett EG; Henson RD; Seilkop SK; McDonald JD; Reed MD. (2006). Effects of hardwood smoke
exposure on allergic airway inflammation in mice. Inhal Toxicol, 18: 33"43. 155677
Bartoli CR; Wellenius GA; Coull BA; Akiyama I; Diaz EA; Lawrence J; Okabe K; Verrier RL; Godleski
JJ. (2009). Concentrated ambient particles alter myocardial blood flow during acute ischemia in
conscious canines. Environ Health Perspect, 117: 333-337. 179904
Bartoli CR; Wellenius GA; Diaz EA; Lawrence J; Coull BA; Akiyama I; Lee LM; Okabe K; Verrier RL;
Godleski JJ. (2009). Mechanisms of Inhaled Fine Particulate Air Pollution-Induced Arterial
Blood Pressure Changes. Environ Health Perspect, 117: 361-366. 156256
Batalha JR; Saldiva P H; Clarke RW; Coull BA; Stearns RC; Lawrence J; Murthy GG; Koutrakis P;
Godleski JJ. (2002). Concentrated ambient air particles induce vasoconstriction of small
pulmonary arteries in rats. Environ Health Perspect, 110: 1191-1197. 088109
Baulig A; Blanchet S; Rumelhard M; Lacroix G; Marano F; Baeza-Squiban A. (2007). Fine urban
atmospheric particulate matter modulates inflammatory gene and protein expression in human
bronchial epithelial cells. , 12: 771-82. 151733
Bayram H; Ito K; Issa R; Ito M; Sukkar M; Chung KF. (2006). Regulation of human lung epithelial cell
numbers by diesel exhaust particles. Eur Respir J, 27: 705-713. 088439
Becher R; Bucht A; Ovrevik J; Hongslo Jan K; Dahlman Hans J; Samuelsen Jan T; Schwarze Per E.
(2007). Involvement of NADPH Oxidase andiNOS in Rodent Pulmonary Cytokine Responses to
Urban Air and Mineral Particles. , 19: 645-55. 097125
Beck-Speier I; Dayal N; Karg E; Maier KL; Schumann G; Schulz H; Semmler M; Takenaka S;
Stettmaier K; Bors W', Ghio A; Samet JM; Heyder J. (2005). Oxidative stress and lipid mediators
induced in alveolar macrophages by ultrafine particles. Free Radic Biol Med, 38: 1080-1092.
156262
Becker S; Dailey LA; Soukup JM; Grambow SC; Devlin RB; Huang YC. (2005). Seasonal variations in
air pollution particle-induced inflammatory mediator release and oxidative stress. Environ
Health Perspect, 113: 1032-1038. 088592
Becker S; Mundandhara S; Devlin RB; Madden M. (2005). Regulation of cytokine production in human
alveolar macrophages and airway epithelial cells in response to ambient air pollution particles:
further mechanistic studies. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 207: 269-275. 088590
Bhattacharyya SN; Dubick MA; Yantis LD; Enriquez JI; Buchanan KC; Batra SK; Smiley RA. (2004).
In vivo effect of wood smoke on the expression of two mucin genes in rat airways. Inflammation,
28: 67-76. 088095
Binkova B; Chvatalova I; Lnenickova Z; Milcova A; Tulupova E; Farmer PB; Sram RJ. (2007). PAH"
DNA adducts in environmentally exposed population in relation to metabolic and DNA repair
gene polymorphisms. , 620: 49-61. 156273
July 2009
D-190
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Bitterle EJ Karg E; Schroeppel A; Kreyling WG; Tippe A; Ferron GA; Schmid O; Heyder J; Maier KL;
Hofer T. (2006). Dose-controlled exposure of A549 epithelial cells at the air-liquid interface to
airborne ultrafine carbonaceous particles. Chemosphere, 65- 1784-1790. 156276
Blanchet S> Ramgolam K> Baulig A; Marano F> Baeza-Squiban A. (2004). Fine particulate matter
induces amphiregulin secretion by bronchial epithelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol, 230:
421-427. 087982
Bonvallot V; Baeza-Squiban A; Baulig A; Brulant Si Boland Si Muzeau Fi Barouki Ri Marano F. (2001).
Organic compounds from diesel exhaust particles ehcit a proinflammatory response in human
airway epithelial cells and induce cytochrome p450 1A1 expression. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol,
25: 515-521. 156283
Brown DMi Hutchison Li Donaldson Ki Stone V. (2007). The effects of PM10 particles and oxidative
stress on macrophages and lung epithelial cells: modulating effects of calcium-signaling
antagonists. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, 292: 1444-1451. 156300
Brown LEi Trought KRi Bailey Cli Clemons JH. (2005). 2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalence and mutagenic
activity associated with PM10 from three urban locations in New Zealand. , 349: 161-174.
095919
Bunger Ji Krahl Ji Munack Ai Ruschel Yi Schroder Oi Emmert Bi Westphal Gi Muller Mi Hallier Ei
Bruning T. (2007). Strong mutagenic effects of diesel engine emissions using vegetable oil as
fuel. Arch Toxicol, 81: 599-603. 156305
Bunger Ji Krahl Ji Weigel Ai Schroder Oi Bruning Ti Muller Mi Hallier Ei Westphal G. (2006).
Influence of fuel properties, nitrogen oxides, and exhaust treatment by an oxidation catalytic
converter on the mutagenicity of diesel engine emissions. Arch Toxicol, 80: 540-546. 156303
Burchiel SWi Lauer FTi Dunaway SLi Zawadzki Ji McDonald JDi Reed MD. (2005). Hardwood smoke
alters murine splenic T cell responses to mitogens following a 6-month whole body inhalation
exposure. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 202: 229-236. 088090
Burchiel SWi Lauer FTi McDonald JDi Reed MD. (2004). Systemic immunotoxicity in AJ mice following
6-month whole body inhalation exposure to diesel exhaust. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 196: 337"
345. 055557
Calcabrini Ai Meschini Si Marra Mi Falzano Li Colone Mi De Berardis Bi Paoletti Li Arancia Gi
Fiorentini C. (2004). Fine environmental particulate engenders alterations in human lung
epithelial A549 cells. , 95: 82-91. 096865
Calderon-Garciduenas Li Maronpot RRi Torres-Jardon Ri Henriquez-Roldan Ci Schoonhoven Ri Acuna-
Ayala Hi Villarreal-Calderon Ai Nakamura Ji Fernando Ri Reed Wi Azzarelli Bi Swenberg JA.
(2003). DNA damage in nasal and brain tissues of canines exposed to air pollutants is associated
with evidence of chronic brain inflammation and neurodegeneration. Toxicol Pathol, 31: 524-538.
156316
Campbell Ai Oldham Mi Becaria Ai Bondy SCi Meacher Di Sioutas Ci Misra Ci Mendez LBi KLeinman
M. (2005). Particulate matter in polluted air may increase biomarkers of inflammation in mouse
brain. Neurotoxicology, 26: 133-140. 087217
Campen MJi Babu NSi Helms GAi Pett Si Wernly Ji Mehran Ri McDonald JD. (2005). Nonparticulate
components of diesel exhaust promote constriction in coronary arteries from ApoE -/- mice.
Toxicol Sci, 88: 95-102. 083977
Campen MJi McDonald JDi Gigliotti APi Seilkop SKi Reed MDi Benson JM. (2003). Cardiovascular
effects of inhaled diesel exhaust in spontaneously hypertensive rats. , 3: 353-361. 055626
Campen MJi McDonald JDi Reed MDi Seagrave J. (2006). Fresh gasoline emissions, not paved road
dust, alter cardiac repolarization in ApoE-/- mice. Cardiovasc Toxicol, 6: 199-210. 096879
Cao Di Tal TLi Graves LMi Gilmour Ii Linak Wi Reed Wi Bromberg PAi Samet JM. (2007). Diesel
exhaust particulate "induced activation of Stat3 requires activities of EGFR and Src in airway
epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, 292: L422-L429. 156322
Cao Qi Zhang Si Dong Ci Song W. (2007). Pulmonary responses to fine particles: Differences between
the spontaneously hypertensive rats and wistar kyoto rats. , 171: 126-37. 097491
Carter JM; Corson N> Driscoll KE; Elder A; Finkelstein JN; Harkema JN; Gelein R; Wade-Mercer P;
Nguyen K> Oberdorster G. (2006). A comparative dose-related response of several key pro- and
antiinflammatory mediators in the lungs of rats, mice, and hamsters after subchronic inhalation
of carbon black. J Occup Environ Med, 48: 1265-1278. 095936
July 2009
D-191
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Carvalho-Oliveira R; Pozo EMK Lobo DJA; Lichtenfels AJFC; Martins-Junior HA; Bustilho JOWV
Saiki Mi Sato IMi Saldiva PHN. (2005). Diesel emissions significantly influence composition and
mutagenicity of ambient particles' a case study in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Environ Res, 98- 1-7.
077898
Cassee FRi Boere AJFi Fokkens PHBi Leseman DLACi Sioutas Ci Kooter IMi Dormans JAMA. (2005).
Inhalation of concentrated particulate matter produces pulmonary inflammation and systemic
biological effects in compromised rats. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 68- 773-796. 087962
Chan C-Ci Chuang K-Ji Chien LrCi Chen W-Ji Chang W"T. (2006). Urban air pollution and emergency
admissions for cerebrovascular diseases in Taipei, Taiwan. Eur Heart J, 27- 1238-1244. 090193
Chang C"Ci Chen S"Hi Ho S"Hi Yang C-Yi Wang H"Di Tsai M-L. (2007). Proteomic analysis of proteins
from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid reveals the action mechanism of ultrafine carbon black-
induced lung injury in mice. Proteomics, !'¦ 4388-4397. 097475
Chang C-Ci Chiu H-F; Wu Y-S; Li Y-C; Tsai M-L; Shen C-K; Yang C-Y. (2005). The induction of
vascular endothelial growth factor by ultrafine carbon black contributes to the increase of
alveolar-capillary permeability. Environ Health Perspect, 113- 454-460. 097776
Chang C-C; Hwang J-S; Chan C"C; Cheng T-J. (2007). Interaction effects of ultrafine carbon black with
iron and nickel on heart rate variability in spontaneously hypertensive rats. , 115- 1012-1017.
155720
Chang C-C; Hwang J-S; Chan C"C; Wang P-Y; Hu T"H; Cheng T-J. (2004). Effects of concentrated
ambient particles on heart rate, blood pressure, and cardiac contractility in spontaneously
hypertensive rats. Inhal Toxicol, 16- 421-429. 055637
Chauhan V; Breznan D; Goegan P; Nadeau D; Karthikeyan S; Brook JR.; Vincent R. (2004). Effects of
ambient air particles on nitric oxide production in macrophage cell lines. Cell Biol Toxicol, 20-
221-239. 096682
Chauhan V; Breznan D; Thomson E; Karthikeyan S; Vincent R. (2005). Effects of ambient air particles
on the endothelin system in human pulmonary epithelial cells (A549). Cell Biol Toxicol, 21- 191-
205. 155722
Che W; Zhang Z; Zhang H; Wu M; Liang Y; Liu F; Shu Y; Li N. (2007). Compositions and oxidative
damage of condensate, particulate and semivolatile organic compounds from gasoline exhausts.
Environ Toxicol Pharmacol, 24- 11-18. 096460
Chen LC; Hwang JS. (2005). Effects of subchronic exposures to concentrated ambient particles (CAPs)
in mice IV Characterization of acute and chronic effects of ambient air fine particulate matter
exposures on heart-rate variability. Inhal Toxicol, 17- 209-216. 087218
Chen LC; Nadziejko C. (2005). Effects of subchronic exposures to concentrated ambient particles
(CAPs) in mice V CAPs exacerbate aortic plaque development in hyperlipidemic mice. Inhal
Toxicol, 17: 217-224. 087219
Cheng MD; Malone B; Storey JM. (2003). Monitoring cellular responses of engine-emitted particles by
using a direct air-cell interface deposition technique. Chemosphere, 53: 237-243. 156337
Cho H-Y; Jedlicka AE; Clarke R; Kleeberger SR. (2005). Role of Toll-like receptor-4 in genetic
susceptibility to lung injury induced by residual oil fly ash. , 22: 108-117. 156344
Churg A; Brauer M; del Carmen Avila-Casado M; Fortoul TI; Wright JL. (2003). Chronic exposure to
high levels of particulate air pollution and small airway remodeling. Environ Health Perspect,
111: 714-718. 087899
Churg A; Xie C; Wang X; Vincent R; Wang RD. (2005). Air pollution particles activate NF-kappaB on
contact with airway epithelial cell surfaces. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 208: 37"45. 088281
Ciencewicki J; Gowdy K; Krantz QT; Linak WP; Brighton L; Gilmour MI; Jaspers I. (2007). Diesel
exhaust enhanced susceptibility to influenza infection is associated with decreased surfactant
protein expression. , 19: 1121-33. 096557
Corey LM; Baker C; Luchtel Daniel L. (2006). Heart-rate variability in the apolipoprotein E knockout
transgenic mouse following exposure to Seattle particulate matter. J Toxicol Environ Health A,
69: 953-965. 156366
Costa DL; Lehmann JR; Winsett D; Richards J; Ledbetter AD; Dreher KL. (2006). Comparative
pulmonary toxicological assessment of oil combustion particles following inhalation or
instillation exposure. Toxicol Sci, 91: 237-246. 088438
Courtois A; Andujar P; Ladeiro Y; Baudrimont I; Delannoy E; Leblais V; Begueret H; Galland MAB;
BrochardP; Marano F. (2008). Impairment of NO "Dependent Relaxation in Intralobar
Pulmonary Arteries: Comparison of Urban Particulate Matter and Manufactured Nanoparticles.
Environ Health Perspect, 116: 1294. 156369
July 2009
D-192
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Cozzi E> Hazarika Si Stallings HWi Cascio WEi Devlin RBi Lust RMi Wingard CJi Van Scott MR.
(2006). Ultrafine particulate matter exposure augments ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice. Am
J Physiol, 291: H894-H903. 091380
Dagher Zi Garcon Gi Billet Si Verdin Ai Ledoux Fi Courcot Di Aboukais Ai Shirali P. (2007). Role of
nuclear factor-kappa B activation in the adverse effects induced by air pollution particulate
matter (PM25) in human epithelial lung cells (L132) in culture. , 27: 284-90. 097566
Dai Ji Xie C> Vincent Ri Churg A. (2003). Air pollution particles produce airway wall remodeling in rat
tracheal explants. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol, 29: 352-358. 087944
Day KCi ReedMD; McDonald JD; Keilkop SK; Barrett EG. (2008). Effects of Gasoline Engine
Emissions on Preexisting Allergic Airway Responses in Mice. Inhal Toxicol, 20: 1145-1155.
190204
de Haar C> Hassing L Bol M> Bleumink R; Pieters R. (2005). Ultrafine carbon black particles cause
early airway inflammation and have adjuvant activity in a mouse allergic airway disease model.
. 87: 409-418. 097872
de Haar Ci Hassing L Bol Mi Bleumink Ri Pieters R. (2006). Ultrafine but not fine particulate matter
causes airway inflammation and allergic airway sensitization to co-administered antigen in
mice. Clin Exp Allergy, 36: 1469-1479. 144746
de Haar Ci Kool Mi Hassing Ii Bol Mi Lambrecht BNi Pieters R. (2008). Lung dendritic cells are
stimulated by ultrafine particles and play a key role in particle adjuvant activity. ,121: 1246-54.
187128
De Kok TMi Hogervorst JG; Briede JJ; Van Herwijnen MHi Maas LMi Moonen EJ; Driece HA;
Kleinjans JC. (2005). Genotoxicity and physicochemical characteristics of traffic-related ambient
particulate matter. Environ Mol Mutagen, 46: 71-80. 088656
DeMarini DM; Brooks LR; Warren SH; Kobayashi T; Gilmour ML Singh P. (2004). Bioassay-directed
fractionation and Salmonella mutagenicity of automobile and forklift diesel exhaust particles.
Environ Health Perspect, 112: 814-819. 066329
Dick CAJ; Brown DM; Donaldson K; Stone V. (2003). The role of free radicals in the toxic and
inflammatory effects of four different ultrafine particle types. Inhal Toxicol, 15: 39"52. 036605
Doherty SP; Prophete C; Maciejczyk P; Salnikow K; Gould T; Larson T; Koenig J; Jaques P; Sioutas C;
Zelikoff JT; Lippmann M; Cohen MD. (2007). Detection of changes in alveolar macrophage iron
status induced by select PM25-associated components using iron-response protein binding
activity. , 19: 553-62. 096532
Dong CC; Yin XJ; Ma JYC; Millecchia L; Barger MW; Roberts JR; Zhang X-D; Antonini JM; Ma JKH.
(2005). Exposure of Brown Norway Rats to diesel exhaust particles Prior to ovalbumin (OVA)
sensitization elicits IgE adjuvant activity but attenuates OVA"induced airway inflammation.
Toxicol Sci, 88: 150-160. 088079
Dong CC; Yin XJ; Ma JYC; Millecchia L; Wu Z-X; Barger MW; Roberts JR; Antonini JM; Dey RD; Ma
JKH. (2005). Effect of diesel exhaust particles on allergic reactions and airway responsiveness in
ovalbumin-sensitized Brown Norway Rats. Toxicol Sci, 88: 202-212. 088083
Doornaert B; Leblond V; Galiacy S; Gras G; Planus E; Laurent V; Isabey D; Lafuma C. (2003). Negative
impact of DEP exposure on human airway epithelial cell adhesion, stiffness, and repair. Am J
Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, 284: L119-132. 156410
Dostert C; Petrilli V; Van Bruggen R; Steele C; Mossman BT; Tschopp J. (2008). Innate Immune
Activation Through Nalp3 Inflammasome Sensing of Asbestos and Silica. , 320: 674. 155753
Doyle M; Sexton KG; Jeffries H; Bridge K; Jaspers I. (2004). Effects of 1,3-butadiene, isoprene, and
their photochemical degradation products on human lung cells. Environ Health Perspect, 112:
1488-1495. 088404
Drela N; Zesko I; Jakubowska M; Biernacka M. (2006). CD28 in thymocyte development and peripheral
T cell activation in mice exposed to suspended particulate matter. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 215:
179-188. 096352
Duvall RM; Norris GA; Dailey LA; Burke JM; McGee JK; Gilmour MI; Gordon T; Devlin RB. (2008).
Source apportionment of particulate matter in the US and associations with lung inflammatory
markers. Inhal Toxicol, 20: 671-83. 097969
Dvonch JT; Brook RD; Keeler GJ; Rajagopalan S; D'Alecy LG; Marsik FJ; Morishita M; Yip FY; Brook
JR; Timm EJ; Wagner JG; Harkema JR. (2004). Effects of concentrated fine ambient particles on
rat plasma levels of asymmetric dimethylarginine. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 473-480. 055741
Dybdahl M; Risom L; Bornholdt J; Autrup H; Loft S; Wallin H. (2004). Inflammatory and genotoxic
effects of diesel particles in vitro and in vivo. DNA Repair (Amst), 562: 119-131. 089013
July 2009
D-193
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Dybing Ei Lovdal Ti Hetland RBi Lovik Mi Schwarze PE. (2004). Respiratory allergy adjuvant and
inflammatory effects of urban ambient particles. Toxicol Sci, 198- 307-314. 097545
ElAssouli Si AlQahtani Mi Milaat W. (2007). Genotoxicity of Air Borne Particulates Assessed by Comet
and the Samonella Mutagenicity Test in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. , 4- 216-223. 186914
Elder Ai Gelein Ri Finkelstein Ji Phipps Ri Frampton Mi Utell Mi Kittelson DBi Watts WFi Hopke Pi
Jeong CHi Kim Ei Liu Wi Zhao Wi Zhuo Li Vincent Ri Kumarathasan Pi Oberdorster G. (2004).
On-road exposure to highway aerosols 2 Exposures of aged, compromised rats. Inhal Toxicol, 16
Suppl l: 41-53. 087354
Elder Ai Gelein Ri Finkelstein JNi Driscoll KEi Harkema Ji Oberdorster G. (2005). Effects of
subchronically inhaled carbon black in three species I Retention kinetics, lung inflammation,
and histopathology. Toxicol Sci, 88- 614-629. 088194
Elder ACPi Gelein Ri Azadniv Mi Frampton Mi Finkelstein Ji Oberdorster G. (2004). Systemic effects of
inhaled ultrafine particles in two compromised, aged rat strains. Inhal Toxicol, 16- 461-471.
055642
Endo Oi Sugita Ki Goto Si Amagai Ti Matsushita H. (2003). Mutagenicity of size-fractioned airborne
particles collected with Andersen low pressure impactor. Eisei Kagaku, 49- 22"27. 097260
Erdinger Li Durr Mi Hopker KA. (2005). Correlations between mutagenic activity of organic extracts of
airborne particulate matter, NOx and sulphur dioxide in southern Germany- results of a two-
year study. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 12: 10-20. 156423
Evans S"Ai Al-Mosawi Ai Adams RAi Berube KA. (2006). Inflammation, edema, and peripheral blood
changes in lung-compromised rats after instillation with combustion-derived and manufactured
nanoparticles. , 32: 363-378. 097066
Farraj AKi Haykal-Coates Ni Ledbetter ADi Evansky PAi Gavett SH. (2006). Neurotrophin mediation
of allergic airways responses to inhaled diesel particles in mice. , 94: 183-92. 141730
Farraj AKi Haykal-Coates Ni Ledbetter ADi Evansky PAi Gavett SH. (2006). Neurotrophin mediation
of allergic airways responses to inhaled diesel particles in mice. Toxicol Sci, 94: 183-192. 189604
Fedulov AVi Leme Ai Yang Zi Dahl Mi Lim Ri Mariani TJi Kobzik L. (2008). Pulmonary exposure to
particles during pregnancy causes increased neonatal asthma susceptibility. Am J Respir Cell
Mol Biol, 38: 57-67. 097482
Finkelman FDi Yang Mi Orekhova Ti Clyne Ei Bernstein Ji Whitekus Mi Diaz-Sanchez Di Morris SC.
(2004). Diesel exhaust particles suppress in vivo IFN-gamma production by inhibiting cytokine
effects on NK and NKT cells. , 172: 3808-3813. 096572
Finnerty Ki Choi J-Ei Lau Ai Davis-Gorman Gi Diven Ci Seaver Ni Linak William Pi Witten Mi
McDonagh Paul F. (2007). Instillation of coarse ash particulate matter and lipopolysaccharide
produces a systemic inflammatory response in mice. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 70: 1957-1966.
156434
Floyd HSi Chen LCi Vallanat Bi Dreher K. (2009). Fine ambient air particulate matter exposure
induces molecular alterations associated with vascular disease progression within plaques of
atherosclerotic susceptible mice. Inhal Toxicol, 21: 394-403. 190350
Folkmann JKi Risom Li Hansen CSi Loft Si Moller P. (2007). Oxidatively damaged DNA and
inflammation in the liver of dyslipidemic ApoE-/- mice exposed to diesel exhaust particles.
Toxicology, 237: 134-44. 097344
Fritsch Si Diabate Si Krug HF. (2006). Incinerator fly ash provokes alteration of redox equilibrium and
liberation of arachidonic acid in vitro. Biol Chem, 387: 1421-1428. 156452
Fujii Ti Hayashi Si Hogg JCi Mukae Hi Suwa Ti Goto Yi Vincent Ri Van Eeden SF. (2002). Interaction
of alveolar macrophages and airway epithelial cells following exposure to particulate matter
produces mediators that stimulate the bone marrow. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol, 27: 34-41.
036478
Fujii Ti Hayashi Si Hogg JCi Vincent Ri Van Eeden SF. (2001). Particulate matter induces cytokine
expression in human bronchial epithelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol, 25: 265-271. 156455
Fujimaki Hi Kurokawa Y. (2004). Diesel exhaust-associated gas components enhance chemokine
production by cervical lymph-node cells from mice immunized with sugi basic proteins. Inhal
Toxicol, 16: 61-65. 189576
Fujimaki Hi Kurokawa Yi Yamamoto Si Satoh M. (2006). Distinct requirements for interleukin-6 in
airway inflammation induced by diesel exhaust in mice. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol, 28:
703-714. 096601
Fujimaki Hi Yamamoto Si Kurokawa Y. (2005). Effect of diesel exhaust on immune responses in
C57BL/6 mice intranasally immunized with pollen antigen. J UOEH, 27: 11-24. 156456
July 2009
D-194
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Fujimoto A; Tsukue Ni Watanabe Mi Sugawara Ii Yanagisawa Ri Takano Hi Yoshida Si Takeda K.
(2005). Diesel exhaust affects immunological action in the placentas of mice. , 20- 431-440.
096556
Furuyama Ai Hirano Si Koike Ei Kobayashi T. (2006). Induction of oxidative stress and inhibition of
plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 production in endothelial cells following exposure to organic
extracts of diesel exhaust particles and urban fine particles. , 80- 154-162. 097056
Gao Fi Barchowsky Ai Nemec AAi Fabisiak JP. (2004). Microbial stimulation by Mycoplasma
fermentans synergistically amplifies IL"6 release by human lung fibroblasts in response to
residual oil fly ash (ROFA) and nickel. Toxicol Sci, 81: 467-479. 087950
Garcon Gi Dagher Zi Zerimech Fi Ledoux Fi Courcot Di Aboukais Ai Puskaric Ei Shirali P. (2006).
Dunkerque City air pollution particulate matter-induced cytotoxicity, oxidative stress and
inflammation in human epithelial lung cells (L132) in culture. Toxicol In Vitro, 20: 519-528.
096633
Gavett SHi Haykal-Coates Ni Copeland L Bi Heinrich J; Gilmour MI. (2003). Metal composition of
ambient PM2.5 influences severity of allergic airways disease in mice. Environ Health Perspect,
111: 1471-1477. 053153
Geng H; Meng Z; Zhang Q. (2005). Effects of blowing sand fine particles on plasma membrane
permeability and fluidity, and intracellular calcium levels of rat alveolar macrophages. , 157:
129-137. 096689
Geng H; Meng Z; Zhang Q. (2006). In vitro responses of rat alveolar macrophages to particle
suspensions and water-soluble components of dust storm PM(2.5). Toxicol In Vitro, 20: 575-584.
097026
Gerlofs-Nijland ME: Rummelhard Mi Boere AJFi Leseman DLACi Duffin Ri Schins RPFi Borm PJAi
Sillanpaa Mi Salonen ROi Cassee FR. (2009). Particle induced toxicity in relation to transition
metal and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon contents . Environ Sci Technol, In Press: 1-8. 190353
Gerlofs-Nijland MEi Boere AJi Leseman DLi Dormans JAi Sandstrom Ti Salonen ROi van Bree Li
Cassee FR. (2005). Effects of particulate matter on the pulmonary and vascular system: time
course in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Part Fibre Toxicol, 24i21: 24i2(l):2. 088652
Gerlofs-Nijland MEi Dormans JAi Bloemen HJi Leseman DLi John Ai Boere Fi Kelly FJi Mudway ISi
Jimenez AAi Donaldson Ki Guastadisegni Ci Janssen NAi Brunekreef Bi Sandstrom Ti van Bree
Li Cassee FR. (2007). Toxicity of coarse and fine particulate matter from sites with contrasting
traffic profiles. , 19: 1055-69. 097840
Ghelfi Ei Rhoden CRi Wellenius GAi Lawrence Ji Gonzalez-Flecha B. (2008). Cardiac oxidative stress
and electrophysiological changes in rats exposed to concentrated air particles are mediated by
TRP-dependent pulmonary reflexes. Toxicol Sci, 102: 328-336. 156468
Ghio AJi Cohen MD. (2005). Disruption of iron homeostasis as a mechanism of biologic effect by
ambient air pollution particles. Inhal Toxicol, 17: 709-716. 088272
Ghio AJi Piantadosi CAi Wang Xi Dailey LAi Stonehuerner JDi Madden MCi Yang Fi Dolan KGi
Garrick MDi Garrick LM. (2005). Divalent metal transporter-1 decreases metal-related injury in
the lung. Am J Physiol, 289: L460-L467. 088275
Gilmour Mli McGee Ji Duvall Rachelle Mi Dailey Li Daniels Mi Boykin Ei Cho S"Hi Doerfler Di Gordon
Ti Devlin Robert B. (2007). Comparative toxicity of size-fractionated airborne particulate matter
obtained from different cities in the United States. , 19 Suppl l: 7-16. 096433
Gilmour Mli O'Connor Si Dick CAJi Miller CAi Linak WP. (2004). Differential pulmonary inflammation
and in vitro cytotoxicity of size-fractionated fly ash particles from pulverized coal combustion. J
Air Waste Manag Assoc, 54: 286-295. 057420
Gilmour PSi Morrison ERi Vickers MAi Ford Ii Ludlam CAi Greaves Mi Donaldson Ki MacNee W.
(2005). The procoagulant potential of environmental particles (PM10). Occup Environ Med, 62:
164-171. 087410
Gilmour PSi Rahman Ii Donaldson Ki MacNee W. (2003). Histone acetylation regulates epithelial IL"8
release mediated by oxidative stress from environmental particles. Retrieved , from . 096959
Gilmour PSi Schladweiler MCi Nyska Ai McGee JKi Thomas Ri Jaskot RHi Schmid Ji Kodavanti UP.
(2006). Systemic imbalance of essential metals and cardiac gene expression in rats following
acute pulmonary zinc exposure. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 69: 2011-2032. 156472
Gilmour PSi Schladweiler MCi Richards JHi Ledbetter ADi Kodavanti UP. (2004). Hypertensive rats
are susceptible to TLR4-mediated signaling following exposure to combustion source particulate
matter. Inhal Toxicol, 16 Suppl l: 5" 18. 087948
July 2009
D-195
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Gilmour PS; Ziesenis A; Morrison ER; Vickers MA; Drost EM; Ford I; Karg EJ Mossa CJ Schroeppel A;
Ferron GA; Heyder J; Greaves M; MacNee W; Donaldson K. (2004). Pulmonary and systemic
effects of short-term inhalation exposure to ultrafine carbon black particles. Toxicol Appl
Pharmacol, 195- 35"44. 054175
Godleski JJ; Clarke RW; Coull BA; Saldiva PHN; Jiang NF; Lawrence J; Koutrakis P. (2002).
Composition of inhaled urban air particles determines acute pulmonary responses. Ann Occup
Hyg, 46: 419-424. 156478
Gong KW; Zhao W; Li N> Barajas B; Kleinman M; Sioutas C; Horvath S; Lusis AJ; Nel A; Araujo JA.
(2007). Air pollutant chemicals and oxidized lipids exhibit genome wide synergistic effects on
endothelial cells. , 8- R149. 091155
Goto Y; Hogg JC; Shih CH; Ishii H; Vincent R; van Eeden SF. (2004). Exposure to ambient particles
accelerates monocyte release from bone marrow in atherosclerotic rabbits. Am J Physiol, 287:
L79-L85. 088100
Gottipolu RR; Wallenborn JG; Karoly ED; Schladweiler MC; Ledbetter AD; Krantz T; Linak WP; Nyska
A; Johnson JA; Thomas R; Richards JE; Jaskot RH; Kodavanti UP. (2009). One-month diesel
exhaust inhalation produces hypertensive gene expression pattern in healthy rats. Environ
Health Perspect, 117: 38-46. 190360
Gowdy K; Krantz QT; Daniels M; Linak WP; Jaspers I; Gilmour MI. (2008). Modulation of pulmonary
inflammatory responses and antimicrobial defenses in mice exposed to diesel exhaust. Toxicol
Appl Pharmacol, 229(3): 310-319. 097226
Graff DW; Schmitt MT; Dailey LA; Duvall RM; Karoly ED; Devlin RB. (2007). Assessing the role of
particulate matter size and composition on gene expression in pulmonary cells. Inhal Toxicol, 19
Suppl l: 23-28. 156488
Greenwell LL; Moreno T; Richards RJ. (2003). Pulmonary antioxidants exert differential protective
effects against urban and industrial particulate matter. , 28: 101-107. 097478
Gualtieri M; Rigamonti L; Galeotti V; Camatini M. (2005). Toxicity of tire debris extracts on human
lung cell line A549. Toxicol In Vitro, 19: 1001-1008. 097841
Gunnison A; Chen LC. (2005). Effects of subchronic exposures to concentrated ambient particles (CAPs)
in mice VI Gene expression in heart and lung tissue. Inhal Toxicol, 17: 225-233. 087956
Gurgueira SA; Lawrence J; Coull B; Murthy GGK; Gonzalez-Flecha B. (2002). Rapid increases in the
steady-state concentration of reactive oxygen species in the lungs and heart after particulate air
pollution inhalation. Environ Health Perspect, 110: 749-755. 036535
Gutierrez-Castillo ME; Roubicek DA; Cebrian-Garcia ME; De Vizcaya-Ruiz A; Sordo-Cedeno M;
Ostrosky-Wegman P. (2006). Effect of chemical composition on the induction of DNA damage by
urban airborne particulate matter. Environ Mol Mutagen, 47: 199-211. 089030
Hamada K; Suzaki Y; Leme A; Ito T; Miyamoto K; Kobzik L; Kimura H. (2007). Exposure of pregnant
mice to an air pollutant aerosol increases asthma susceptibility in offspring. J Toxicol Environ
Health A, 70: 688-695. 091235
Hamoir J; Nemmar A; Halloy D; Wirth D; Vincke G; Vanderplasschen A; Nemery B; Gustin P. (2003).
Effect of polystyrene particles on lung microvascular permeability in isolated perfused rabbit
lungs: role of size and surface properties. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 190: 278-285. 096664
Hansen C; Neller A; Williams G; Simpson R. (2007). Low levels of ambient air pollution during
pregnancy and fetal growth among term neonates in Brisbane, Australia. Environ Res, 103: 383"
389. 090703
Hao M; Cornier S; Wang M; Lee James J; Nel A. (2003). Diesel exhaust particles exert acute effects on
airway inflammation and function in murine allergen provocation models. J Allergy Clin
Immunol, 112: 905-914. 096565
Happo MS; Salonen RO; Halinen AL Jalava PI; Pennanen AS; Kosma VM; Sillanpaa M; Hillamo R;
Brunekreef B; Katsouyanni K; Sunyer J; Hirvonen MR. (2007). Dose and time dependency of
inflammatory responses in the mouse lung to urban air coarse, fine, and ultrafine particles from
six European cities. , 19: 227-246. 096630
Harder V; Gilmour P; Lentner B; Karg E; Takenaka S; Ziesenis A; Stampfl A; Kodavanti U; Heyder J;
Schulz H. (2005). Cardiovascular responses in unrestrained WKY rats to inhaled ultrafine
carbon particles. Inhal Toxicol, 17: 29"42. 087371
Harkema JR; Keeler G; Wagner J; Morishita M; Timm E; Hotchkiss J; Marsik F; Dvonch T; Kaminski
N; Barr E. (2004). Effects of concentrated ambient particles on normal and hypersecretory
airways in rats. 056842
July 2009
D-196
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Harrod KS; Jaramillo RJ; Berger JA; Gigliotti AP; Seilkop SK; Reed MD. (2005). Inhaled diesel engine
emissions reduce bacterial clearance and exacerbate lung disease to Pseudomonas aeruginosa
infection in vivo. Toxicol Sci, 83- 155-165. 088144
Harrod KS; Jaramillo RJ; Rosenberger CL; Wang S"Z; Berger JA; McDonald JD; Reed MD. (2003).
Increased susceptibility to RSV infection by exposure to inhaled diesel engine emissions. , 28-
451-463. 097046
Heidenfelder BL; Reif DM; Harkema JR; Cohen Hubal EA; Hudgens EE; Bramble LA; Wagner JG;
Morishita M; Keeler GJ; Edwards SW; Gallagher JE. (2009). Comparative microarray analysis
and pulmonary changes in brown norway rats exposed to ovalbumin and concentrated air
particulates. Toxicol Sci, 108: 207-221. 190026
Hetland RB; Cassee FR; Lag M; Refsnes M; Dybing E; Schwarze PE. (2005). Cytokine release from
alveolar macrophages exposed to ambient particulate matter: heterogeneity in relation to size,
city and season. Part Fibre Toxicol, http: 2006]. 087887
Hetland RB; Cassee FR; Refsnes M; Schwarze PE; Lag M; Boere AJF; Dybing E. (2004). Release of
inflammatory cytokines, cell toxicity and apoptosis in epithelial lung cells after exposure to
ambient air particles of different size fractions. Toxicol In Vitro, 18: 203-212. 097535
Hiramatsu K; Azuma A; Kudoh S; Desaki M; Takizawa H; Sugawara I. (2003). Inhalation of diesel
exhaust for three months affects major cytokine expression and induces bronchus-associated
lymphoid tissue formation in murine lungs. , 29: 607-622. 155846
Hiramatsu K; Saito Y; Sakakibara K; Azuma A; Kudoh S; Takizawa H; Sugawara I. (2005). The effects
of inhalation of diesel exhaust on murine mycobacterial infection. , 31: 405-415. 088285
Hirano S; Furuyama A; Koike E; Kobayashi T. (2003). Oxidative-stress potency of organic extracts of
diesel exhaust and urban fine particles in rat heart microvessel endothelial cells. Toxicology,
187: 161-170. 097345
Holder AL; Lucas D; Goth-Goldstein R; Koshland CP. (2008). Cellular Response to Diesel Exhaust
Particles Strongly Depends on the Exposure Method. Toxicol Sci, 103: 108-115. 093322
Hollingsworth JW; Cook DN; Brass DM; Walker JKL; Morgan DL; Foster WM; Schwartz DA. (2004).
The role of Toll-like receptor 4 in environmental airway injury in mice. , 170: 126-132. 097816
Hougaard KS; Jensen KA; Nordly P; Taxvig C; Vogel U; Saber AT; Wallin H. (2008). Effects of prenatal
exposure to diesel exhaust particles on postnatal development, behavior, genotoxicity and
inflammation in mice. Part Fibre Toxicol, 5- 3. 156570
Huang JY; Liao JW; Liu YC; Lu SY; Chou CP; Chan WH; Chen SU; Ueng TH. (2008). Motorcycle
exhaust induces reproductive toxicity and testicular interleukin-6 in male rats. Toxicol Sci, 103:
137-148. 156574
Huang SL; Hsu MK; Chan CC. (2003). Effects of submicrometer particle compositions on cytokine
production and lipid peroxidation of human bronchial epithelial cells. Environ Health Perspect,
111: 478-482. 087376
Hutchison GR; Brown DM; Hibbs LR; Heal MR; Donaldson K; Maynard RL; Monaghan M; Nicholl A;
Stone V. (2005). The effect of refurbishing a UK steel plant on PM10 metal composition and
ability to induce inflammation. Respir Res, 6: 43. 097750
Hwang B-F; Lee Y"L; Lin Y-C; Jaakkola JJE Guo YL. (2005). Traffic related air pollution as a
determinant of asthma among Taiwanese school children. Thorax, 60: 467-473. 089454
Iba MM; Fung J; Chung L; Zhao J; Winnik B; Buckley BT; Chen LC; Zelikoff JT; Kou YR. (2006).
Differential inducibility of rat pulmonary CYP1A1 by cigarette smoke and wood smoke. , 606: 1-
11. 156582
Ichinose T; Takano H; Sadakane K; Yanagisawa R; Kawazato H; Sagai M; Shibamoto T. (2003).
Differences in airway-inflammation development by house dust mite and diesel exhaust
inhalation among mouse strains. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 187: 29"37. 041525
Ichinose T; Takano H; Sadakane K; Yanagisawa R; Yoshikawa T; Sagai M; Shibamoto T. (2004). Mouse
Strain Differences in Eosinophilic Airway Inflammation Caused by Intratracheal Instillation of
Mite Allergen and Diesel Exhaust Particles. J Appl Toxicol, 24: 69"76. 180367
Imrich A; Ning Y; Lawrence J; Coull B; Gitin E; Knutson M; Kobzik L. (2007). Alveolar macrophage
cytokine response to air pollution particles: oxidant mechanisms. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 218:
256-264. 155859
Inoue K-L Takano H; Yanagisawa R; Hirano S; Ichinose T; Shimada A; Yoshikawa T. (2006). The role
of toll-like receptor 4 in airway inflammation induced by diesel exhaust particles. , 80: 275-279.
097815
July 2009
D-197
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Inoue K"L Takano H; Yanagisawa R; Ichinose T> Sakurai M> Yoshikawa T. (2006). Effects of nano
particles on cytokine expression in murine lung in the absence or presence of allergen. , 80- 614"
619. 096720
Inoue K"i; Takano H; Yanagisawa R; Sakurai Mi Ueki Ni Yoshikawa T. (2007). Effects of diesel exhaust
particles on cytokine production by splenocytes stimulated with lipopolysaccharide. , 27- 95-100.
096702
Inoue Ki Takano Hi Yanagisawa Ri Ichinose T> Sadakane K> Yoshino Si Yamaki K> Uchiyama K>
Yoshikawa T. (2004). Components of diesel exhaust particles differentially affect lung expression
of cyclooxygenase-2 related to bacterial endotoxin. J Appl Toxicol, 24- 415-418. 087984
Inoue Ki Takano H; Yanagisawa R; Sakurai M> Ichinose T> Sadakane K> Yoshikawa T. (2005). Effects of
nano particles on antigen-related airway inflammation in mice. , 6- 106. 188444
Inoue E Takano H; Yanagisawa R; Sakurai M> Ueki Ni Yoshikawa T. (2006). Effects of diesel exhaust
on lung inflammation related to bacterial endotoxin in mice. , 99- 346-352. 190142
Ishihara Yi Kagawa J. (2003). Chronic diesel exhaust exposures of rats demonstrate concentration and
time-dependent effects on pulmonary inflammation. Inhal Toxicol, 15- 473-492. 096404
Ishii Hi Fujii Ti Hogg JCi Hayashi Si Mukae Hi Vincent Ri van Eeden SF. (2004). Contribution of IL"1
beta and TNF-alpha to the initiation of the peripheral lung response to atmospheric particulates
(PM10). Am J Physiol, 287: L176-L183. 088103
Ishii Hi Hayashi Si Hogg JCi Fujii Ti Goto Yi Sakamoto Ni Mukae Hi Vincent Ri van Eeden SF. (2005).
Alveolar macrophage-epithelial cell interaction following exposure to atmospheric particles
induces the release of mediators involved in monocyte mobilization and recruitment. Respir Res,
6: 87. 096138
Ito Ki Christensen WFi Eatough DJi Henry RCi Kim Ei Laden Fi Lall Ri Larson TVi Neas Li Hopke PKi
Thurston GD. (2006). PM source apportionment and health effects: 2 An investigation of
intermethod variability in associations between source-apportioned fine particle mass and daily
mortality in Washington, DC. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 16: 300-310. 088391
Ito Ti Suzuki Ti Tamura Ki Nezu Ti Honda Ki Kobayashi T. (2008). Examination of mRNA expression
in rat hearts and lungs for analysis of effects of exposure to concentrated ambient particles on
cardiovascular function. Toxicol Sci, 243: 271-283. 096823
Izawa Hi Watanabe Gi Taya Ki Sagai M. (2007). Inhibitory effects of foods and polyphenols on
activation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor induced by diesel exhaust particles. , 14: 149-156. 190387
Jacobsen NRi Mrller Pi Cohn CAi Loft Si Vogel Ui Wallin H. (2008). Diesel exhaust particles are
mutagenic in FEl-Muta™ Mouse lung epithelial cells. , 641: 54-57. 156597
Jalava Pi Salonen ROi Halinen Ali Sillanpaa Mi Sandell Ei Hirvonen MR. (2005). Effects of sample
preparation on chemistry, cytotoxicity, and inflammatory responses induced by air particulate
matter. Inhal Toxicol, 17: 107-117. 088648
Jalava PL Salonen ROi Halinen Ali Penttinen Pi Pennanen ASi Sillanpaa Mi Sandell Ei Hillamo Ri
Hirvonen M-R. (2006). In vitro inflammatory and cytotoxic effects of size-segregated particulate
samples collected during long-range transport of wildfire smoke to Helsinki. Toxicol Appl
Pharmacol, 215: 341-353. 155872
Jalava PL Salonen ROi Pennanen ASi Sillanpaa Mi Halinen Ali Happo MSi Hillamo Ri Brunekreef Bi
Katsouyanni Ki Sunyer Ji Hirvonen M-R. (2007). Heterogeneities in inflammatory and cytotoxic
responses of RAW 264.7 macrophage cell line to urban air coarse, fine, and ultrafine particles
from six European sampling campaigns. , 19: 213-225. 096950
Jang A-Si Choi Inseon Si Takizawa Hi Rhim Ti Lee J-Hi Park S"Wi Park C-S. (2005). Additive effect of
diesel exhaust particulates and ozone on airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammation in a
mouse model of asthma. , 20: 759-763. 155313
Jaspers Ii Ciencewicki JMi Zhang Wi Brighton LEi Carson JLi Beck MAi Madden MC. (2005). Diesel
exhaust enhances influenza virus infections in respiratory epithelial cells. Toxicol Sci, 85: 990-
1002.088115
Jimenez LAi Drost EMi Gilmour PSi Rahman Ii Antonicelli Fi Ritchie Hi MacNee Wi Donaldson K.
(2002). PM10-exposed macrophages stimulate a proinflammatory response in lung epithelial
cells via TNF-alpha. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, 282: L237-248. 156610
Jung Hi Guo Bi Anastasio C> Kennedy IM. (2006). Quantitative measurements of the generation of
hydroxyl radicals by soot particles in a surrogate lung fluid. Atmos Environ, 40: 1043-1052.
132421
Kaan PM; Hegele RG. (2003). Interaction between respiratory syncytial virus and particulate matter in
guinea pig alveolar macrophages. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol, 28: 697-704. 095753
July 2009
D-198
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Kafoury RM! Madden MC. (2005). Diesel exhaust particles induce the over expression of tumor necrosis
factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) gene in alveolar macrophages and failed to induce apoptosis through
activation of nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB). Int J Environ Health Res, 2- 107-113. 156617
Karlsson HL; Ljungman AG; Lindbom J; Moller L. (2006). Comparison of genotoxic and inflammatory
effects of particles generated by wood combustion, a road simulator and collected from street and
subway. Toxicol Lett, 165: 203-211. 156625
Karlsson HL; Nilsson L; Moller L. (2005). Subway particles are more genotoxic than street particles
and induce oxidative stress in cultured human lung cells. Chem Res Toxicol, 18: 19-23. 086392
Kato A; Kagawa J. (2003). Morphological effects in rat lungs exposed to urban roadside air. Inhal
Toxicol, 15: 799-818. 089563
Katterman ME; Birchard SJ Seraphin S; Riley Mark R. (2007). Cellular evaluation of the toxicity of
combustion derived particulate matter: influence of particle grinding and washing on cellular
response. Chemosphere, 66: 567-573. 096358
Kendall M; Guntern J; Lockyer NP; Jones FH; Hutton BM; Lippmann M; Tetley TD. (2004). Urban
PM2.5 surface chemistry and interactions with bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Inhal Toxicol, 16
Suppl l: 115-129. 156634
Khandoga A; Stampfl A; Takenaka S; Schulz H; Radykewicz R; Kreyling W; Krombach F. (2004).
Ultrafine particles exert prothrombotic but not inflammatory effects on the hepatic
microcirculation in healthy mice in vivo. , 109: 1320-1325. 087928
Kim YM; Reed W', Wu W', Bromberg PA; Graves LM; Samet JM. (2005). Zn2+"induced IL"8 expression
involves AP-1, JNK, and ERK activities in human airway epithelial cells. Am J Physiol, 290:
L1028-1035. 088454
Klein-Patel ME; Diamond G; Boniotto M; Saad S; Ryan LK. (2006). Inhibition of beta-defensin gene
expression in airway epithelial cells by low doses of residual oil fly ash is mediated by vanadium.
, 92: 115-125. 097092
Kleinman M; Phalen R. (2006). Toxicological interactions in the respiratory system after inhalation of
ozone and sulfuric acid aerosol mixtures. Inhal Toxicol, 18: 295-303. 088596
Kleinman M; Sioutas C; Stram D; Froines J; Cho A; Chakrabarti B; Hamade A; Meacher D; Oldham M.
(2005). Inhalation of concentrated ambient particulate matter near a heavily trafficked road
stimulates antigen-induced airway responses in mice. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 55: 1277-1288.
087880
Kleinman MT Sioutas C Chang MC Boere AJ Cassee FR. (2003). Ambient fine and coarse particle
suppression of alveolar macrophage functions. Toxicol Lett, 137: 151-158. 087938
Kleinman MT; Araujo JA; Nel A; Sioutas C; Campbell A; Cong PQ; Li H; Bondy SC. (2008). Inhaled
ultrafine particulate matter affects CNS inflammatory processes and may act via MAP kinase
signaling pathways. Toxicol Lett, 178: 127-130. 190074
Kleinman MT; Hyde DM; Bufalino C; Basbaum C; Bhalla DK; Mautz WJ. (2003). Toxicity of chemical
components of fine particles inhaled by aged rats: effects of concentration. J Air Waste Manag
Assoc, 53: 1080-1087. 053535
Kleinman MT; Sioutas C; Froines JR; Fanning E; Hamade A; Mendez L; Meacher D; Oldham M. (2007).
Inhalation of concentrated ambient particulate matter near a heavily trafficked road stimulates
antigen-induced airway responses in mice. , 19 Suppl l: 117-26. 097082
Knuckles T; Lund A; Lucas S; Campen M. (2008). Diesel exhaust exposure enhances venoconstriction
via uncoupling of eNOS. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 230: 346. 191987
Knuckles TL; Dreher KL. (2007). Fine oil combustion particle bioavailable constituents induce
molecular profiles of oxidative stress, altered function, and cellular injury in cardiomyocytes. J
Toxicol Environ Health A, 70: 1824-1837. 156652
Kodavanti UP; Schladweiler MC; Gilmour PS; Wallenborn JG; Mandavilli BS; Ledbetter AD; Christiani
DC; Runge MS; Karoly ED; Costa DL; Peddada S; Jaskot R; Richards JH; Thomas R;
Madamanchi NR; Nyska A. (2008). The role of particulate matter-associated zinc in cardiac
injury in rats. , 116: 13-20. 155907
Kodavanti UP; Schladweiler MC; Ledbetter AD; McGee JK; Walsh L; Gilmour PS; Highfill JW; Davies
D; Pinkerton KE; Richards JH; Crissman K; Andrews D; Costa DL. (2005). Consistent
pulmonary and systemic responses from inhalation of fine concentrated ambient particles: roles
of rat strains used and physicochemical properties. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 1561-1568.
087946
July 2009
D-199
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Koike E> Kobayashi T. (2005). Organic extract of diesel exhaust particles stimulates expression of la
and costimulatory molecules associated with antigen presentation in rat peripheral blood
monocytes but not in alveolar macrophages. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 209- 277-285. 088303
Kooter IMJ Boere AJ; Fokkens PH; Leseman DL; Dormans JA; Cassee FR. (2006). Response of
spontaneously hypertensive rats to inhalation of fine and ultrafine particles from traffic-
experimental controlled study. Part Fibre Toxicol, 15- 3-7. 097547
Kristovich R; Knight DA; Long JF; Williams MV; Dutta PK; Waldman WJ. (2004). Macrophage-
mediated endothehal inflammatory responses to airborne particulates' impact of particulate
physicochemical properties. Chem Res Toxicol, 17- 1303-1312. 087963
Kubatova A; Steckler TS; Gallagher JR; Hawthorne SB; Picklo MJSr. (2004). Toxicity of wide-range
polarity fractions from wood smoke and diesel exhaust particulate obtained using hot
pressurized water. Environ Toxicol Chem, 23: 2243-2250. 087986
Kumar VS; Mani U; Prasad AK; Lai K; Gowri V; Gupta A. (2004). Effect of fly ash inhalation on
biochemical and histomorphological changes in rat lungs. , 42: 964-968. 096655
Kyoso M; Narisawa M; Ito E; Ishijima M; Yana K; Kato A; Ito T; Ishihara Y. (2005). Influence of
Exposure to Diesel Emissions in Rats and Distribution Profile for R-R Interval. 186998
Landvik NE; Gorria M; Arlt VM; Asare N; Solhaug A; Lagadic-Gossmann D; Holme JA. (2007). Effects
of nitrated-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and diesel exhaust particle extracts on cell
signalling related to apoptosis: possible implications for their mutagenic and carcinogenic
effects. Toxicology, 231: 159-174. 096722
Last JA; Ward R; Temple L; Pinkerton KE; Kenyon NJ. (2004). Ovalbumin-induced airway
inflammation and fibrosis in mice also exposed to ultrafine particles. , 16: 93-102. 097334
Lee CC; Cheng YW! Kang JJ. (2005). Motorcycle exhaust particles induce IL"8 production through NF-
kappaB activation in human airway epithelial cells. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 68: 1537-1555.
156682
Lei Y-C; Chan C-C; Wang P-Y; Lee C-T; Cheng T-J. (2004). Effects of Asian dust event particles on
inflammation markers in peripheral blood and bronchoalveolar lavage in pulmonary
hypertensive rats. Environ Res, 95: 71-76. 087884
Lei YC; Chen MC; Chan CC; Wang PY; Lee CT; Cheng TJ. (2004). Effects of concentrated ambient
particles on airway responsiveness and pulmonary inflammation in pulmonary hypertensive
rats. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 785-792. 087999
Lei YC; Hwang JS; Chan CC; Lee CT; Cheng TJ. (2005). Enhanced oxidative stress and endothelial
dysfunction in streptozotocin-diabetic rats exposed to fine particles. Environ Res, 99: 335-343.
088660
Lemos M; Mohallen S; Macchione M; Dolhnikoff M; Assunaao J; Godleski J; Saldiva P. (2006). Chronic
exposure to urban air Pollution induces structural alterations in murine pulmonary and
coronary arteries. Inhal Toxicol, 18: 247-253. 088594
Li J; Ghio AJ; Cho SH; Brinckerhoff CE; Simon SA; Liedtke W. (2009). Diesel exhaust particles activate
the matrix-metalloproteinase-1 gene in human bronchial epithelia in a beta-arrestin-dependent
manner via activation of RAS. Environ Health Perspect, 117: 400-409. 190424
Li J; Li Q; Xu J; Li J; Cai X; Liu R; Li Y; Ma J; Li W. (2007). Comparative study on the acute
pulmonary toxicity induced by 3 and 20 nm Ti02 primary particles in mice. Environ Toxicol
Pharmacol, 24: 239-244. 093156
Li N; Kim S; Wang M; Froines JR; Sioutas. (2002). Use of a stratified oxidative stress model to study
the biological effects of ambient concentrated and diesel exhaust particulate matter. Inhal
Toxicol, 14: 459-486. 042080
Li N; Wang M; Oberley TD; Sempf JM; Ne. (2002). Comparison of the pro-oxidative and
proinflammatory effects of organic diesel exhaust particle chemicals in bronchial epithelial cells
and macrophages. J Immunol, 169: 4531-4541. 087451
Li Y-J; Kawada T; Matsumoto A; Azuma A; Kudoh S; Takizawa H; Sugawara I. (2007). Airway
inflammatory responses to oxidative stress induced by low-dose diesel exhaust particle exposure
differ between mouse strains. Exp Lung Res, 33: 227-244. 155929
Li Z; Carter JD; Dailey LA; Huang YC. (2005). Pollutant particles produce vasoconstriction and
enhance MAPK signaling via angiotensin type I receptor. Environ Health Perspect, 11: 1009"
1014. 088647
Li Z; Hyseni X; Carter JD; Soukup JM; Dailey LA; Huang Y-CT. (2006). Pollutant particles enhanced
H202 production from NAD(P)H oxidase and mitochondria in human pulmonary artery
endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, 291: C357-365. 156693
July 2009
D-200
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Lichtenfels AJFC; Gomes JB; Pieri PC; Miraglia SGEK; Hallak J; Saldiva PHN. (2007). Increased
levels of air pollution and a decrease in the human and mouse male-to-female ration in Sao
Paulo, Brazil. Fertil Steril, 87: 230-232. 097041
Lijinsky W> Reuber MD. (1987). Chronic carcinogenesis studies of acrolein and related compounds.
Toxicol Ind Health, 3: 337-345. 007583
Lindbom J; Gustafsson M> Blomqvist G> Dahl A; Gudmundsson A; Swietlicki E> Ljungman AG. (2007).
Wear particles generated from studded tires and pavement induces inflammatory reactions in
mouse macrophage cells. , 20: 937-946. 155934
Lippmann Mi Hwang Ji Maclejczyk Pi Chen L. (2005). PM source apportionment for short-term cardiac
function changes in ApoE-/- mice. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 1575-1579. 087453
Lippmann Mi Ito Ki Hwang JSi Maciejczyk Pi Chen LC. (2006). Cardiovascular effects of nickel in
ambient air. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 1662-9. 091165
Liu Ji Ballaney Mi Al-Alem U> Quan Ci Jin X> Perera F> Chen LC; Miller RL. (2008). Combined Inhaled
Diesel Exhaust Particles and Allergen Exposure Alter Methylation of T Helper Genes and IgE
Production In Vivo. Toxicol Sci, 102: 76-81. 156709
Liu L-JS; Curjuric L Keidel D> Heldstab J; Kunzli N> Bayer-Oglesby L> Ackermann-Liebrich U>
Schindler Ci SAPALDIA team. (2007). Characterization of source-specific air pollution exposure
for a large population-based Swiss cohort (SAPALDIA). Environ Health Perspect, 115: 1638"
1645. 093093
Liu P-Li Chen Y"Li Chen Y"Hi Lin S-Ji Kou Y-R. (2005). Wood smoke extract induces oxidative stress-
mediated caspase-independent apoptosis in human lung endothelial cells: role of AIF and
EndoG. Am J Physiol, 289: L739-L749. 088304
Liu Xi Meng Z. (2005). Effects of airborne fine particulate matter on antioxidant capacity and lipid
peroxidation in multiple organs of rats. Inhal Toxicol, 17: 467-473. 088650
Liu Y-Qi Keane Mi Ensell Mi Miller Wi Kashon Mi Ong T-mi Mauderly Ji Lawson Di Gautam Mi
Zielinska Bi Whitney Ki Eberhardt Ji Wallace W. (2005). In vitro genotoxicity of exhaust
emissions of diesel and gasoline engine vehicles operated on a unified driving cycle. , !'¦ 60-66.
097019
Long JFi Waldman WJi Kristovich Ri Williams Mi Knight Di Dutta PK. (2005). Comparison of
ultrastructural cytotoxic effects of carbon and carbon/iron particulates on human monocyte-
derived macrophages. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 170-174. 087454
Lopes FDi Pinto TS; Arantes-Costa FM; Moriya HT; Biselli PJ; Ferraz LF; Lichtenfels AJ; Saldiva PH;
Mauad T> Martins MA. (2009). Exposure to ambient levels of particles emitted by traffic worsens
emphysema in mice. Environ Res, 109: 544-551. 190430
Lund AK; Knuckles TL; Obot Akata C> Shohet R; McDonald JD; Gigliotti A; Seagrave JC; Campen MJ.
(2007). Gasoline exhaust emissions induce vascular remodeling pathways involved in
atherosclerosis. Toxicol Sci, 95: 485-94. 125741
Lund AE Lucero J; Lucas S; Madden MC; McDonald JD; Seagrave JC; Knuckles TL; Campen MJ.
(2009). Vehicular emissions induce vascular MMP-9 expression and activity associated with
endothelin-l-mediated pathways. , 29: 511-7. 191159
Lundborg M; Bouhafs R; Gerde P; Ewing P; Camner P; Dahlen SE; Jarstrand C. (2007). Aggregates of
ultrafine particles modulate lipid peroxidation and bacterial killing by alveolar macrophages. ,
104: 250-57. 096040
Ma C; Wang J; Luo J. (2004). Activation of nuclear factor kappa B by diesel exhaust particles in mouse
epidermal cells through phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway. Biochem
Pharmacol, 67: 1975-1983. 088417
Maciejczyk P; Chen LC. (2005). Effects of subchronic exposures to concentrated ambient particles
(CAPs) in mice: VIII source-related daily variations in in vitro responses to CAPs. Inhal Toxicol,
17: 243-253. 087456
Mangum JB; Bermudez E; Sar M; Everitt JI. (2004). Osteopontin expression in particle-induced lung
disease. , 30: 585-598. 097326
Martin S; Dawidowski L; Mandalunis P; Cereceda-Balic F; Tasat DR. (2007). Characterization and
biological effect of Buenos Aires urban air particles on mice lungs. , 105: 340-9. 096366
Mason CE. (2002). Gasoline ETBE vapor condensate rat micronucleus test (satellite procedure). 087645
Matsumoto A; Hiramatsu K; Li Y; Azuma A; Kudoh S; Takizawa H; Sugawara I. (2006). Repeated
exposure to low-dose diesel exhaust after allergen challenge exaggerates asthmatic responses in
mice. Clin Immunol, 121: 227-235. 189213
July 2009
D-201
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Matsumoto Si Ishii Hi Tanabe Ti Kawai J. (2007). Chemical state analysis of fine particles using XAFS.
, 93: 132-137. 187020
Mauad Ti Rivero DHi de Oliveira RCi Lichtenfels AJi Guimaraes ETi de Andre PAi Kasahara Dli
Bueno HMi Saldiva PH. (2008). Chronic exposure to ambient levels of urban particles affects
mouse lung development. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 178: 721-728. 156743
McDonald JDi Harrod KSi Seagrave Ji Seikop SKi Mauderly JL. (2004). Effects of low sulfur fuel
composition and a catalyzed particle trap on the composition and toxicity of diesel emissions.
Environ Health Perspect, 112: 1307-1312. 087459
McQueen DSi Donaldson Ki Bond SMi McNeilly JDi Newman Si Barton NJi Duffin R. (2007). Bilateral
vagotomy or atropine pre "treatment reduces experimental diesel-soot induced lung
inflammation. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 219: 62-71. 096266
Medeiros N Jri Rivero DHi Kasahara DIi Saiki Mi Godleski JJi Koutrakis Pi Capelozzi VLi Saldiva PHi
Antonangelo L. (2004). Acute pulmonary and hematological effects of two types of particle
surrogates are influenced by their elemental composition. , 95: 62-70. 096012
Mehta Mi Chen LCi Gordon Ti Rom Wi Tang MS. (2008). Particulate matter inhibits DNA repair and
enhances mutagenesis. , 657: 116-121. 190440
Mohallem SVi de Araujo Lobo DJi Pesquero CRi Assuncao JVi de Andre PAi Saldiva PHi Dolhnikoff M.
(2005). Decreased fertility in mice exposed to environmental air pollution in the city of Sao
Paulo. Environ Res, 98: 196-202. 088657
Moller Wi Hofer Ti Ziesenis Ai Karg Ei Heyder J. (2002). Ultrafine particles cause cytoskeletal
dysfunctions in macrophages. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 182: 197-207. 036589
Montiel-Davalos Ai Alfaro-Moreno Ei Lopez-Marure R. (2007). PM2.5 and PM10 induce the expression
of adhesion molecules and the adhesion of monocytic cells to human umbilical vein endothelial
cells. Inhal Toxicol, 19 Suppl l: 91-98. 156778
Mori Ti Watanuki Ti Kashiwagura T. (2007). Diesel exhaust particles disturb gene expression in mouse
testis. , 22: 58-63. 096564
Morishita Mi Keeler Gi Wagner Ji Marsik Fi Timm Ei Dvonch Ji Harkema J. (2004). Pulmonary
retention of particulate matter is associated with airway inflammation in allergic rats exposed
to air pollution in urban Detroit. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 663-674. 087979
Moyer CFi Kodavanti UPi Haseman JKi Costa DLi Nyska A. (2002). Systemic vascular disease in male
B6C3F1 mice exposed to particulate matter by inhalation: studies conducted by the national
toxicology program. Toxicol Pathol, 30: 427-434. 052222
Mutlu GMi Green Di Bellmeyer Ai Baker CMi Burgess Zi Rajamannan Ni Christman JWi Foiles Ni
Kamp DWi Ghio AJi Chandel NSi Dean DAi Sznajder Jli Budinger GR. (2007). Ambient
particulate matter accelerates coagulation via an IL"6"dependent pathway. , 117: 2952-61.
121441
Mutlu GMi Snyder Ci Bellmeyer Ai Wang Hi Hawkins Ki Soberanes Si Welch LCi Ghio AJi Chandel
NSi Kamp Di Sznajder Jacob Ii Budinger GRS. (2006). Airborne particulate matter inhibits
alveolar fluid reabsorption in mice via oxidant generation. , 34: 670-676. 155994
Nadziejko Ci Fang Ki Chen LCi Cohen Bi Karpatkin Mi Nadas A. (2002). Effect of concentrated
ambient particulate matter on blood coagulation parameters in rats. 050587
Nadziejko Ci Fang Ki Nadziejko Ei Narciso SPi Zhong Mi Chen LC. (2002). Immediate effects of
particulate air pollutants on heart rate and respiratory rate in hypertensive rats. , 2' 245-252.
087460
Nadziejko Ci Fang Ki Narciso Si Zhong Mi Su WCi Gordon Ti Nadas Ai Chen LC. (2004). Effect of
particulate and gaseous pollutants on spontaneous arrhythmias in aged rats. Inhal Toxicol, 16:
373-380. 055632
Nemmar Ai Al-Maskari Si Ali Badreldin Hi Al-Amri Issa S. (2007). Cardiovascular and lung
inflammatory effects induced by systemically administered diesel exhaust particles in rats. Am J
Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, 292: L664-L670. 156800
Nemmar Ai Hoet PHi Dinsdale Di Vermylen Ji Hoylaerts MFi Nemery B. (2003). Diesel exhaust
particles in lung acutely enhance experimental peripheral thrombosis. , 107: 1202-8. 096567
Nemmar Ai Hoet PHi Vermylen Ji Nemery Bi Hoylaerts MF. (2004). Pharmacological stabilization of
mast cells abrogates late thrombotic events induced by diesel exhaust particles in hamsters. ,
110: 1670-1677. 087959
Nemmar Ai Hoylaerts MFi Hoet PHMi Vermylen Ji Nemery B. (2003). Size effect of intratr ache ally
instilled particles on pulmonary inflammation and vascular thrombosis. Toxicol Appl
Pharmacol, 186: 38-45. 087931
July 2009
D-202
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Nemmar A; Inuwa IM. (2008). Diesel exhaust particles in blood trigger systemic and pulmonary
morphological alterations. , 176- 20-30. 096566
Nemmar A; Nemery B; Hoet PHM; Vermylen J; Hoylaerts MF. (2003). Pulmonary inflammation and
thrombogenicity caused by diesel particles in hamsters' role of histamine. , 168- 1366-1372.
097487
Niwa Y> Hiura Y> Murayama T> Yokode Mi Iwai N. (2007). Nano-sized carbon black exposure
exacerbates atherosclerosis in LDL-receptor knockout mice. Circ J, 71- 1157-1161. 091309
Niwa Yi Hiura Y> Sawamura Hi Iwai N. (2008). Inhalation exposure to carbon black induces
inflammatory response in rats. Circ J, 72- 144-149. 156812
Nozaki JI; Yamamoto R; Ma Li Shima M. (2007). Trial to evaluate effects of ambient particulate matter
on health- A preliminary study using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. , 12- 138-42. 097862
Nurkiewicz TR; Porter DW; Barger Mi Castranova V; Boegehold MA. (2004). Particulate matter
exposure impairs systemic microvascular endothelium-dependent dilation. Environ Health
Perspect, 112: 1299-1306. 087968
Nurkiewicz TR; Porter DW; Barger Mi Millecchia Li Rao KM; Marvar PJ; Hubbs AF; Castranova V;
Boegehold MA. (2006). Systemic microvascular dysfunction and inflammation after pulmonary
particulate matter exposure. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 412-419. 088611
Nurkiewicz TR; Porter DW; Hubbs AF; Cumpston JL; Chen BT; Frazer DG; Castranova V. (2008).
Nanoparticle inhalation augments particle-dependent systemic microvascular dysfunction. Part
Fibre Toxicol, 5: 1. 156816
Nurkiewicz TR; Porter DW; Hubbs AF; Stone S; Chen BT; Frazer DG; Boegehold MA; Castranova V.
(2009). Pulmonary nanoparticle exposure disrupts systemic microvascular nitric oxide signaling.
, 110: 191-203. 191961
Nygaard UC; Alberg T; Bleumink R; Aase A; Dybing E; Pieters R; Lovik M. (2005). Ambient air
particles from four European cities increase the primary cellular response to allergen in the
draining lymph node. Toxicology, 207: 241-254. 088655
Nygaard UC; Ormstad H; Aase A; Lovik M. (2005). The IgE adjuvant effect of particles:
characterisation of the primary cellular response in the draining lymph node. Toxicology, 206:
181-193. 087980
Nygaard UC; Samuelsen M; Aase A; Lovik M. (2004). The capacity of particles to increase allergic
sensitization is predicted by particle number and surface area, not by particle mass. Toxicol Sci,
82: 515-524. 058558
Obot CJ; Morandi MT; Beebe TP; Hamilton RF; Holian A. (2002). Surface components of airborne
particulate matter induce macrophage apoptosis through scavenger receptors. Toxicol Appl
Pharmacol, 184: 98-106. 042370
Obot CJ; Morandi MT; Hamilton RF; Holian A. (2004). A comparison of murine and human alveolar
macrophage responses to urban particulate matter. , 16: 69"76. 095938
Oh S-M; Chung K"H. (2006). Identification of mammalian cell genotoxins in respirable diesel exhaust
particles by bioassay-directed chemical analysis. Toxicol Lett, 161: 226-235. 088296
Okayama Y; Kuwahara M; Suzuki AK; Tsubone H. (2006). Role of reactive oxygen species on diesel
exhaust particle-induced cytotoxicity in rat cardiac myocytes. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 69:
1699-1710. 156824
Okeson CD; Riley MR; Fernandez A; Wendt JOL. (2003). Impact of the composition of combustion
generated fine particles on epithelial cell toxicity: influences of metals on metabolism.
Chemosphere, 51: 1121-1128. 042292
Okeson CD; Riley MR; Riley-Saxton E. (2004). In vitro alveolar cytotoxicity of soluble components of
airborne particulate matter: effects of serum on toxicity of transition metals. Toxicol In Vitro, 18:
673-680. 087961
Ono N; Oshio S; Niwata Y; Yoshida S; Tsukue N; Sugawara I; Takano H; Takeda K. (2007). Prenatal
exposure to diesel exhaust impairs mouse spermatogenesis. Inhal Toxicol, 19: 275-281. 156007
Osornio-Vargas AR; Bonner JC; Alfaro-Moreno E; Martinez L; Garcia-Cuellar CJ Rosales SP; Miranda
J; Rosas I. (2003). Proinflammatory and cytotoxic effects of Mexico City air pollution particulate
matter in vitro are dependent on particle size and composition. Environ Health Perspect, 111:
1289-1293. 052417
Pastorkova A; Cerna M; Smid J; Vrbikova V. (2004). Mutagenicity of airborne particulate matter PM10.
Cent Eur J Public Health, 12: S72-S75. 087431
July 2009
D-203
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Penn A; Murphy Gi Barker Si Henk Wi Penn L. (2005). Combustion-derived ultrafine particles
transport organic toxicants to target respiratory cells. Environ Health Perspect, 113- 956-963.
088257
Pereira CELi Heck TGi Saldiva PHNi Rhoden CR. (2007). Ambient particulate air pollution from
vehicles promotes lipid peroxidation and inflammatory responses in rat lung. , 40- 1353-1359.
156019
Pinkerton KEi Zhou Yi Teague SVi Peake JLi Walther RCi Kennedy IMi Leppert VJi Aust AE. (2004).
Reduced lung cell proliferation following short-term exposure to ultrafine soot and iron particles
in neonatal rats' key to impaired lung growth?. Inhal Toxicol, 1- 73-81. 087465
Pires-Neto RCi Lichtenfels AJi Soares SRi Macchione Mi Saldiva PHNi Dolhnikoff M. (2006). Effects of
Sao Paulo air pollution on the upper airways of mice. , 101- 356-361. 096734
Poma Ai Limongi Ti Pisani Ci Granato Vi Picozzi P. (2006). Genotoxicity induced by fine urban air
particulate matter in the macrophages cell line RAW 264.7. Toxicol In Vitro, 20: 1023-1029.
096903
Pourazar Ji Mudway ISi Samet JMi Helleday Ri Blomberg Ai Wilson SJi Frew AJi Kelly FJi Sandstrom
T. (2005). Diesel exhaust activates redox-sensitive transcription factors and kinases in human
airways. Am J Physiol, 289: L724-L730. 088305
Pozzi Ri De Berardis Bi Paoletti Li Guastadisegni C. (2005). Winter urban air particles from Rome
(Italy): effects on the monocytic-macrophagic RAW 2647 cell line. Environ Res, 99: 344-354.
088610
Pradhan A; Waseem Mi Dogra Si Khanna AKi Kaw JL. (2005). Alterations in bronchoalveolar lavage
constituents, oxidant/antioxidant status, and lung histology following intratracheal instillation
of respirable suspended particulate matter. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol, 24: 19-32. 096128
Proctor SDi Dreher KLi Kelly SEi Russell JC. (2006). Hypersensitivity of prediabetic JCR: LA_cp rats to
fine airborne combustion particle-induced direct and noradrenergic-mediated vascular
contraction. Toxicol Sci, 90: 385-391. 088480
Prophete Ci Maciejczyk Pi Salnikow Ki Gould Ti Larson Ti Koenig Ji Jaques Pi Sioutas Ci Lippmann Mi
Cohen M. (2006). Effects of select PM-associated metals on alveolar macrophage phosphorylated
ERK1 and -2 and iNOS expression during ongoing alteration in iron homeostasis. J Toxicol
Environ Health A, 69: 935-951. 156888
Radomski Ai Jurasz Pi Alonso-Escalano Di Drews Mi Morandi Mi Malinski Ti Radomski MW. (2005).
Nanoparticle-induced platelet aggregation and vascular thrombosis. , 146: 882-893. 091377
Ramage Li Guy K. (2004). Expression of C-reactive protein and heat-shock protein-70 in the lung
epithelial cell line A549, in response to PM10 exposure. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 447-452. 055640
Ramos Ci Cisneros Ji Gonzalez-Avila Gi Becerril Ci Ruiz Vi Montano M. (2009). Increase of matrix
metalloproteinases in woodsmoke-induced lung emphysema in guinea pigs. Inhal Toxicol, 21:
119-132. 190116
Rao KM; Ma JYi Meighan Ti Barger MWi Pack Di Vallyathan V. (2005). Time course of gene expression
of inflammatory mediators in rat lung after diesel exhaust particle exposure. Environ Health
Perspect, 113: 612-617. 095756
Reed MDi Barrett EGi Campen MJi Divine KKi Gigliotti APi McDonald JDi Seagrave JCi Mauderly JLi
Seilkop SKi Swenberg JA. (2008). Health effects of subchronic inhalation exposure to gasoline
engine exhaust. Inhal Toxicol, 20: 1125-1143. 156903
Reed MDi Campen MJi Gigliotti APi Harrod KSi McDonald JDi Seagrave JCi Mauderly JLi Seilkop SK.
(2006). Health effects of subchronic exposure to environmental levels of hardwood smoke. Inhal
Toxicol, 18: 523-539. 156043
Reed MDi Gigliotti APi McDonald JDi Seagrave JCi Seilkop SKi Mauderly JL. (2004). Health effects of
subchronic exposure to environmental levels of diesel exhaust. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 177-193.
055625
Reibman Ji Hsu Yi Chen LCi Bleck Bi Gordon T. (2003). Airway epithelial cells release MIP"
3alpha/CCL20 in response to cytokines and ambient particulate matter. Am J Respir Cell Mol
Biol, 28: 648-654. 156905
Rengasamy Ai Barger MWi Kane Ei Ma JKHi Castranova Vi Ma JYC. (2003). Diesel exhaust particle-
induced alterations of pulmonary phase I and phase II enzymes of rats. J Toxicol Environ Health
A, 66: 153-167. 156907
Renwick LCi Brown Di Clouter Ai Donaldson K. (2004). Increased inflammation and altered
macrophage chemotactic responses caused by two ultrafine particle types. Occup Environ Med,
61: 442-447. 056067
July 2009
D-204
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Rhoden CR; Ghelfi E> Gonzalez-Flecha B. (2008). Pulmonary inflammation by ambient air particles is
mediated by superoxide anion. Inhal Toxicol, 20' 11-15. 190475
Rhoden CR; Lawrence J; Godleski JJ; Gonzalez-Flecha B. (2004). N-acetylcysteine prevents lung
inflammation after short-term inhalation exposure to concentrated ambient particles. Toxicol
Sci, 79: 296-303. 087969
Rhoden CR; Wellenius GA; Ghelfi E; Lawrence J; Gonzalez-Flecha B. (2005). PM"induced cardiac
oxidative stress and dysfunction are mediated by autonomic stimulation. Biochim Biophys Acta,
1725: 305-313. 087878
Riley MR; Boesewetter DE; Kim AM; Sirvent FP. (2003). Effects of metals Cu, Fe, Ni, V, and Zn on rat
lung epithelial cells. Toxicology, 190: 171-184. 053237
Riley MR; Boesewetter DE; Turner RA; Kim AM; Collier JM; Hamilton A. (2005). Comparison of the
sensitivity of three lung derived cell lines to metals from combustion derived particulate matter.
Toxicol In Vitro, 19: 411-419. 096452
Rivedal E; Myhre O; Sanner T; Eide I. (2003). Supplemental role of the Ames mutation assay and gap
junction intercellular communication in studies of possible carcinogenic compounds from diesel
exhaust particles. , 77: 533-542. 097684
Rivero DH; Soares SR; Lorenzi-Filho G; Saiki M; Godleski JJ; Antonangelo L; Dolhnikoff M; Saldiva
PH. (2005). Acute cardiopulmonary alterations induced by fine particulate matter of Sao Paulo,
Brazil. Toxicol Sci, 85: 898-905. 088653
Roberts JR; Young S"H; Castranova V; Antonini JM. (2007). Soluble metals in residual oil fly ash alter
innate and adaptive pulmonary immune responses to bacterial infection in rats. Toxicol Appl
Pharmacol, 221: 306-319. 097623
Rodriguez Ferreira Rivero DH; Sassaki C; Lorenzi-Filho G; Nascimento Saldiva PH. (2005). PM2.5
induces acute electrocardiographic alterations in healthy rats. Environ Res, 99: 262-266. 088659
Rosas Perez I; Serrano J; Alfaro-Moreno E; Baumgardner D; Garcia-Cuellar C; Martin Del Campo JM;
Raga GB; Castillejos M; Colin RD; Osornio Vargas AR. (2007). Relations between PM10
composition and cell toxicity: a multivariate and graphical approach. Chemosphere, 67: 1218-28.
097967
Roubicek DA; Gutierrez-Castillo ME; Sordo M; Cebrian-Garcia ME; Ostrosky-Wegman P. (2007).
Micronuclei induced by airborne particulate matter from Mexico City. , 631: 9-15. 156929
Saber AT; Bornholdt J; Dybdahl M; Sharma AK; Loft S; Vogel U; Wallin H. (2005). Tumor necrosis
factor is not required for particle-induced genotoxicity and pulmonary inflammation. , 79: 177-
182. 097865
Sakamoto N> Hayashi S; Gosselink J; Ishii H; Ishimatsu Y; Mukae H; Hogg JC; van Eeden SF. (2007).
Calcium dependent and independent cytokine synthesis by air pollution particle-exposed human
bronchial epithelial cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 225: 134-141. 096282
Salnikow K; Li X; Lippmann M. (2004). Effect of nickel and iron co-exposure on human lung cells.
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 196: 258-265. 087469
Salonen R; Halinen A; Pennanen A; Hirvonen M; Sillanpaa M; Hillamo R; Shi R; Borm P; Sandell E;
Koskentalo T; Aarnio P. (2004). Chemical and in vitro toxicologic characterization of wintertime
and springtime urban-air particles with an aerodynamic diameter below 10 jim in Helsinki. , 30:
80-90. 187053
Samet JM; Dewar BJ; Wu W', Graves LM. (2003). Mechanisms of Zn2+"induced signal initiation
through the epidermal growth factor receptor. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 191: 86"93. 113782
Santini MT; Rainaldi G; Ferrante A; Romano R; Clemente S; Motta A; De Berardis B; Balduzzi M;
Paoletti L; Indovina PL. (2004). Environmental fine particulate matter (PM25) activates the
RAW 2647 macrophage cell line even at very low concentrations as revealed by 1H NMR. Chem
Res Toxicol, 17: 63-74. 087879
Saxena QB; Saxena RK; Siegel PD; Lewis DM. (2003). Identification of organic fractions of diesel
exhaust particulate (DEP) which inhibit nitric oxide (NO) production from a murine macrophage
cell line. , 143: 317-322. 096986
Saxena RK; Saxena QB; Weissman DN; Simpson JP; Bledsoe TA; Lewis DM. (2003). Effect of diesel
exhaust particulate on bacillus Calmette-Guerin lung infection in mice and attendant changes in
lung interstitial lymphoid subpopulations and IFN gamma response. Toxicol Sci, 73: 66-71.
054395
Schins RPF; Lightbody JH; Borm PJA; Shi T; Donaldson K; Stone V. (2004). Inflammatory effects of
coarse and fine particulate matter in relation to chemical and biological constituents. Toxicol
Appl Pharmacol, 195: 1-11. 054173
July 2009
D-205
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Schneider J; Hock Ni Weimer S> Borrmann Si Kirchner Ui Vogt Ri Scheer V. (2005). Nucleation
particles in diesel exhaust- composition inferred from in situ mas spectrometric analysis.
Environ Sci Technol, 39- 6153-6161. 088368
Schober Wi Belloni Bi Lubitz Si Eberlein-Konig Bi Bohn Pi Saritas Yi Lintelmann Ji Matuschek Gi
Behrendt Hi Buters J. (2006). Organic extracts of urban aerosol (< or =PM25) enhance rBet v 1-
induced upregulation of CD63 in basophils from birch pollen-allergic individuals. , 90- 377-384.
097321
Seagrave Ji Campen Mi McDonald Ji Mauderly Ji Rohr A. (2008). Oxidative stress, inflammation, and
pulmonary function assessment in rats exposed to laboratory-generated pollutant mixtures. , 71-
1352.191990
Seagrave Ji Dunaway Si McDonald JDi Mauderly JLi Hayden Pi Stidley C. (2007). Responses of
differentiated primary human lung epithelial cells to exposure to diesel exhaust at an air-liquid
interface. , 33: 27-51. 097549
Seagrave Ji Knall Ci McDonald JDi Mauderly JL. (2004). Diesel particulate material binds and
concentrates a proinflammatory cytokine that causes neutrophil migration. Inhal Toxicol, l: 93"
98. 087470
Seagrave Ji Mauderly JLi Seilkop SK. (2003). In vitro relative toxicity screening of combined
particulate and semivolatile organic fractions of gasoline and diesel engine emissions. J Toxicol
Environ Health A, 66: 1113-1132. 054979
Seagrave Ji McDonald JDi Reed MDi Seilkop SKi Mauderly JL. (2005). Responses to subchronic
inhalation of low concentrations of diesel exhaust and hardwood smoke measured in rat
bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Inhal Toxicol, 17: 657-670. 088000
Seagrave JCi McDonald JDi Bedrick Ei Edgerton ESi Gigliotti APi Jansen JJi Ke Li Naeher LPi Seilkop
SKi Zheng Mi Mauderley JL. (2006). Lung toxicity of ambient particulate matter from
southeastern US sites with different contributing sources: relationships between composition
and effects. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 1387-93. 091291
Sevastyanova Oi Binkova Bi Topinka Ji Sram RJi Kalina Ii Popov Ti Novakova Zi Farmer PB. (2007).
In vitro genotoxicity of PAH mixtures and organic extract from urban air particles part II:
human cell lines. , 620: 123-134. 156969
Sharma AKi Jensen KAi Rank Ji White PAi Lundstedt Si Gagne Ri Jacobsen NRi Kristiansen Ji Vogel
Ui Wallin H. (2007). Genotoxicity, inflammation and physico-chemical properties of fine particle
samples from an incineration energy plant and urban air. , 633: 95-111. 156975
Shi Ti Knaapen AMi Begerow Ji Birmili Wi Borm PJi Schins RP. (2003). Temporal variation of hydroxyl
radical generation and 8"hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine formation by coarse and fine particulate
matter. Occup Environ Med, 60: 315-321. 088248
Shwe T-T-Wi Yamamoto Si Kakeyama Mi Kobayashi Ti Fujimaki H. (2005). Effect of intratracheal
instillation of ultrafine carbon black on proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine release and
mRNA expression in lung and lymph nodes of mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 209: 51-61. 111553
Sigaud Si Goldsmith Carroll-Ann Wi Zhou Hi Yang Zi Fedulov Ai Imrich Ai Kobzik L. (2007). Air
pollution particles diminish bacterial clearance in the primed lungs of mice. Toxicol Appl
Pharmacol, 223: 1-9. 096100
Silva PJi Erupe ME; Price D; Elias J; Malloy QG; Li Q; Warren B; Cocker DR, 3rd. (2008).
Trimethylamine as precursor to secondary organic aerosol formation via nitrate radical reaction
in the atmosphere. Environ Sci Technol, 42: 4689-4696. 156981
Simkhovich BZ; Marjoram P; Kleinman MT; Kloner RA. (2007). Direct and acute cardiotoxicity of
ultrafine particles in young adult and old rat hearts. Basic Res Cardiol, 102: 467-475. 096594
Singh P; DeMarini DM; Dick CA; Tabor DG; Ryan JV; Linak WP; Kobayashi T; Gilmour MI. (2004).
Sample characterization of automobile and forklift diesel exhaust particles and comparative
pulmonary toxicity in mice. Environ Health Perspect, 112: 820-825. 087472
Sirivelu MP; MohanKumar SMJ; Wagner JG; Harkema JR; MohanKumar PS. (2006). Activation of the
stress axis and neurochemical alterations in specific brain areas by concentrated ambient
particle exposure with concomitant allergic airway disease. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 870"
874. 111151
Skarek M; Janosek J; Cupr P; Kohoutek J; Novotna-Rychetska A; Holoubek I. (2007). Evaluation of
genotoxic and non-genotoxic effects of organic air pollution using in vitro bioassays. Environ Int,
33: 859-66. 096814
July 2009
D-206
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Smith KR; Kim Si Recendez JJ; Teague SV; Menache MG; Grubbs DE; Sioutas C> Pinkerton KE.
(2003). Airborne particles of the California Central Valley alter the lungs of healthy adult rats.
Environ Health Perspect, 111: 902-908. 042107
Smith KR; Veranth JM; Kodavanti UP; Aust AE; Pinkerton KE. (2006). Acute pulmonary and systemic
effects of inhaled coal fly ash in rats: comparison to ambient environmental particles. , 93: 390-9.
110864
Somers CM; McCarry BE; Malek F; Quinn JS. (2004). Reduction of particulate air pollution lowers the
risk of heritable mutations in mice. , 304: 1008-1010. 078098
Somers CM; Yauk CL; White PA; Parfett CLJ; Quinn JS. (2002). Air pollution induces heritable DNA
mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 99: 15904-15907. 078100
Song CL; Zhou YC; Huang RJ; Wang YQ; Huang QF; Lu G; Liu KM. (2007). Influence of ethanol-diesel
blended fuels on diesel exhaust emissions and mutagenic and genotoxic activities of particulate
extracts. , 149: 355-363. 155306
Song H-M; Jang A"S; Ahn M-H; Takizawa H; Lee S-H; Kwon J-H; Lee Y-M; Rhim T; Park C-S. (2008).
Yml and Ym2 expression in a mouse model exposed to diesel exhaust particles. , 23: 110-116.
156093
Steerenberg P; Verlaan A; De Klerk A; Boere A; Loveren H; Cassee F. (2004). Sensitivity to ozone,
diesel exhaust particles, and standardized ambient particulate matter in rats with a listeria
monocytogenes-induced respiratory infection. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 311-317. 087474
Steerenberg P; Withagen C; Dalen W; Dormans J; Loveren H. (2004). Adjuvant Activity of Ambient
Particulate Matter in Macrophage Activity-Suppressed, N"Acetylcysteine-Treated, iNOS" and
IL-4"Deficient Mice. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 835-843. 087981
Steerenberg PA; Van Amelsvoort L; Lovik M; Hetland RB; Alberg T; Halatek T; Bloemen HJT;
Rydzynski K; Swaen G; Schwarze P; Dybing E; Cassee FR. (2006). Relation between sources of
particulate air pollution and biological effect parameters in samples from four European cities:
an exploratory study. Inhal Toxicol, 18: 333-346. 088249
Steerenberg PA; Withagen CE; van Dalen WJ; Dormans JA; Heisterkamp SH; van Loveren H; Cassee
FR. (2005). Dose dependency of adjuvant activity of particulate matter from five European sites
in three seasons in an ovalbumin-mouse model. Inhal Toxicol, 17: 133-145. 088649
Stevens JP; Zahardis J; MacPherson M; Mossman BT; Petrucci GA. (2008). A new method for
quantifiable and controlled dosage of particulate matter for in vitro studies: the Electrostatic
Particulate Dosage and Exposure System (EPDExS). Toxicol In Vitro, 22(7): 1768-1774. 155363
Stinn W; Teredesai A; Anskeit E; Rustemeier K; Schepers G; Schnell P; Haussmann H-J; Carchman
RA; Coggins CR; Reininghaus W. (2005). Chronic nose-only inhalation study in rats, comparing
room-aged sidestream cigarette smoke and diesel engine exhaust. Inhal Toxicol, 17: 549-576.
088307
Sugamata M; Ihara T; Sugamata M; Takeda K. (2006). Maternal Exposure to Diesel Exhaust Leads to
Pathological Similarity to Autism in Newborns. Eisei Kagaku, 52: 486-488. 157025
Sun Q; Wang A; Jin X; Natanzon A; Duquaine D; Brook RD; Aguinaldo J-GS; Fayad ZA; Fuster V;
Lippmann M; Chen Lung C; Rajagopalan S. (2005). Long-term air pollution exposure and
acceleration of atherosclerosis and vascular inflammation in an animal model. , 294: 3003-3010.
186814
Sun Q; Yue P; Deiuliis JA; Lumeng CN; Kampfrath T; Mikolaj MB; Cai Y; Ostrowski MC; Lu B;
Parthasarathy S; Brook RD; Moffatt-Bruce SD; Chen LC; Rajagopalan S. (2009). Ambient air
pollution exaggerates adipose inflammation and insulin resistance in a mouse model of diet-
induced obesity. Circulation, 119: 538-546. 190487
Sun Q; Yue P; Kirk RI; Wang A; Moatti D; Jin X; Lu B; Schecter AD; Lippmann M; Gordon T; Chen LC;
Rajagopalan S. (2008). Ambient air particulate matter exposure and tissue factor expression in
atherosclerosis. Inhal Toxicol, 20: 127-137. 157033
Sun Q; Yue P; Ying Z; Cardounel AJ; Brook RD; Devlin R; Hwang JS; Zweier JL; Chen LC;
Rajagopalan S. (2008). Air Pollution Exposure Potentiates Hypertension Through Reactive
Oxygen Species-Mediated Activation of Rho/ROCK. Arterioscler Thromb Vase Biol, 28: 1760"
1766.157032
Sureshkumar V; Paul B; Uthirappan M; Pandey R; Sahu AP; Lai K; Prasad AK; Srivastava S; Saxena
A; Mathur N; Gupta YK. (2005). Proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokine balance in
gasoline exhaust induced pulmonary injury in mice. Inhal Toxicol, 17: 161-168. 088306
July 2009
D-207
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Takizawa Hi Abe Si Okazaki Hi Kohyama Ti Sugawara Ii Saito Yi Ohtoshi Ti Kawasaki Si Desaki Mi
Nakahara Ki Yamamoto Ki Matsushima Ki Tanaka Mi Sagai Mi Kudoh S. (2003). Diesel exhaust
particles upregulate eotaxin gene expression in human bronchial epithelial cells via nuclear
factor-kappa B-dependent pathway. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, 284- L1055-1062.
157039
Tal TLi Graves LMi Silbajoris Ri Bromberg PAi Wu Wi Samet JM. (2006). Inhibition of protein tyrosine
phosphatase activity mediates epidermal growth factor receptor signaling in human airway
epithelial cells exposed to Zn2+. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 214- 16-23. 108588
Tamagawa Ei Bai Ni Morimoto Ki Gray Ci Mui Ti Yatera Ki Zhang Xi Xing Li Li Yi Laher I. (2008).
Particulate matter exposure induces persistent lung inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. ,
295: L79. 191988
Tamaoki Ji Isono Ki Takeyama Ki Tagaya Ei Nakata Ji Nagai A. (2004). Ultrafine carbon black
particles stimulate proliferation of human airway epithelium via EGF receptor-mediated
signaling pathway. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, 287: L1127-1133. 157040
Tankersley CGi Bierman Ai Rabold R. (2007). Variation in heart rate regulation and the effects of
particle exposure in inbred mice. , 19: 621-9. 097910
Tankersley CGi Campen Mi Bierman Ai Flanders SEi Broman KWi Rabold R. (2004). Particle effects on
heart-rate regulation in senescent mice. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 381-390. 094378
Tankersley CGi Champion HCi Takimoto Ei Gabrielson Ki Bedja Di Misra Vi El-Haddad Hi Rabold Ri
Mitzner W. (2008). Exposure to inhaled particulate matter impairs cardiac function in senescent
mice. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol, 295: R252-263. 157043
Tao Fi Kobzik L. (2002). Lung macrophage-epithelial cell interactions amplify particle-mediated
cytokine release. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol, 26: 499-505. 157044
Tesfaigzi Yi McDonald JDi Reed MDi Singh SPi De Sanctis GTi Eynott PR; Hahn FF; Campen MJi
Mauderly JL. (2005). Low-level subchronic exposure to wood smoke exacerbates inflammatory
responses in allergic rats. Toxicol Sci, 88: 505-513. 156116
Tesfaigzi Y; Singh SP; Foster JE; Kubatko J; Barr EB; Fine PM; McDonald JD; Hahn FF; Mauderly JL.
(2002). Health effects of subchronic exposure to low levels of wood smoke in rats. Toxicol Sci, 65:
115-125. 025575
Thomson E; Kumarathasan P; Goegan P; Aubin RA; Vincent R. (2005). Differential regulation of the
lung endothelin system by urban particulate matter and ozone. Toxicol Sci, 88: 103-113. 087554
Thomson E; Kumarathasan PJ Vincent R. (2006). Pulmonary expression of preproET-1 and preproET"3
mRNAs is altered reciprocally in rats after inhalation of air pollutants. Exp Biol Med
(Maywood), 231: 979-984. 097483
Tin-Tin-Win-Shwe; Yamamoto S; Ahmed S; Kakeyama M; Kobayashi T; Fujimaki H. (2006). Brain
cytokine and chemokine mRNA expression in mice induced by intranasal instillation with
ultrafine carbon black. Toxicol Lett, 63: 153-160. 088415
Tomita Si Maekawa S"Ii Rahman Mi Saito Fi Kizu Ri Tohi Ki Ueno Ti Nakase Hi Gonzalez FJi
Hayakawa Ki Korenaga Ti Takahama Y. (2006). Thymic involution produced by diesel exhaust
particles and their constituents in mice. , 88: 113-124. 097827
Tong Yi Zhang Gi Li Yi Tan Mi Wang Wi Chen Ji Hwu Yi Hsu P-Ci Je JHi Margaritondo Gi Song Wi
Jiang Ri Jiang Z. (2006). Synchrotron microradiography study on acute lung injury of mouse
caused by PM(25) aerosols. , 58: 266-272. 097699
Totlandsdal AIi Refsnes Mi Skomedal Ti Osnes JBi Schwarze PEi Lag M. (2008). Particle-induced
cytokine responses in cardiac cell cultures-"the effect of particles versus soluble mediators
released by particle-exposed lung cells. Toxicol Sci, 106: 233-241. 157056
Tozuka Yi Watanabe Ni Ohsawa Mi Toriba Ai Kizu Ri Hayakawa K. (2004). Transfer of polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons to fetuses and breast milk of rats exposed to diesel exhaust. Eisei
Kagaku, 50: 497-502. 090864
Tsukue Ni Tsubone Hi Suzuki AK. (2002). Diesel exhaust affects the abnormal delivery in pregnant
mice and the growth of their young. Inhal Toxicol, 14: 635-651. 030593
Tsukue Ni Yoshida Si Sugawara Ii Taked K. (2004). Effect of diesel exhaust on development of fetal
reproductive function in ICR female mice. Eisei Kagaku, 50: 174-80. 096643
Tzeng H"Pi Yang R-Si Ueng T"Hi Lin-Shiau S"Yi Liu S"H. (2003). Motorcycle exhaust particulates
enhance vasoconstriction in organ culture of rat aortas and involve reactive oxygen species. , 75:
66-73. 097247
July 2009
D-208
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Tzeng H-P; Yang Rong Si Ueng T"Hi Liu S_H. (2007). Upregulation of cyclooxygenase-2 by motorcycle
exhaust particulate "induced reactive oxygen species enhances rat vascular smooth muscle cell
proliferation. , 20: 1170-1176. 097883
U.S. EPA. (1976). Air quality data - 1970 annual statistics. 015607
Ueng T-Hi Hung OCi Kuo M-Li Chan P-Ki Hu S-Hi Yang P-Ci Chang Louis W. (2005). Induction of
fibroblast growth factor-9 and interleukin-lalpha gene expression by motorcycle exhaust
particulate extracts and benzo(a)pyrene in human lung adenocarcinoma cells. , 87: 483-496.
097054
Ueng T-Hi Wang H"Wi Huang Y-Pi Hung C-C. (2004). Antiestrogenic effects of motorcycle exhaust
particulate in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells and immature female rats. , 46: 454-462.
096199
Umbuzeiro GAi Franco Ai Martins MHi Kummrow Fi Carvalho Li Schmeiser HHi Leykauf Ji Stiborova
Mi Claxton LD. (2008). Mutagenicity and DNA adduct formation of PAH, nitro-PAH, and oxy-
PAH fractions of atmospheric particulate matter from Sao Paulo, Brazil. , 652: 72-80. 190491
Upadhyay Di Panduri Vi Ghio Ai Kamp DW. (2003). Particulate matter induces alveolar epithelial cell
DNA damage and apoptosis: role of free radicals and the mitochondria. , 29: 180-187. 097370
Upadhyay Si Stoeger Ti Harder Vi Thomas RFi Schladweiler MCi Semmler-Behnke Mi Takenaka Si
Karg Ei Reitmeir Pi Bader Mi Stampfl Ai Kodovanti Ui Schulz H. (2008). Exposure to ultrafine
carbon particles at levels below detectablepulmonary inflammation affects cardiovascular
performance inspontaneously hypertensive rats. Part Fibre Toxicol, 5- 19. 159345
Valavanidis Ai Vlahoyianni Ti Fiotakis K. (2005). Comparative study of the formation of oxidative
damage marker 8"hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8"OHdG) adduct from the nucleoside 2'-
deoxyguanosine by transition metals and suspensions of particulate matter in relation to metal
content and redox reactivity. , 39: 1071-1081. 096432
Valentine Ri Himmelstein MW. (2001). Overview of the acute, subchronic, reproductive, developmental
and genetic toxicology of "beta"-chloroprene. Chem Biol Interact, 135: 81-100. 019011
Veranth Ji Kaser Ei Veranth Mi Koch Mi Yost G. (2007). Cytokine responses of human lung cells
(BEAS-2B) treated with micron-sized and nanoparticles of metal oxides compared to soil dusts.
Part Fibre Toxicol, 4- 2. 090346
Veranth JMi Moss TAi Chow JCi Labban Ri Nichols WKi Walton JCi Walton JGi Yost GS. (2006).
Correlation of in vitro cytokine responses with the chemical composition of soil-derived
particulate matter. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 341-349. 087479
Veranth JMi Reilly CAi Veranth MMi Moss TAi Langelier CRi Lanza DLi Yost GS. (2004).
Inflammatory cytokines and cell death in BEAS-2B lung cells treated with soil dust,
lipopolysaccharide, and surface-modified particles. Toxicol Sci, 82: 88"96. 087480
Veras MMi Damaceno-Rodrigues NRi Caldini EGi Maciel Ribeiro AAi Mayhew TMi Saldiva PHi
Dolhnikoff M. (2008). Particulate urban air pollution affects the functional morphology of mouse
placenta. Biol Reprod, 79: 578-584. 190493
Veras MMi Damaceno-Rodrigues NRi Guimaraes Silva RMi Scoriza JNi Saldiva PHi Caldini EGi
Dolhnikoff M. (2009). Chronic exposure to fine particulate matter emitted by traffic affects
reproductive and fetal outcomes in mice. Environ Res, 109: 536-543. 190496
Veronesi Bi De Haar Ci Lee Li Oortgiesen M. (2002). The surface charge of visible particulate matter
predicts biological activation in human bronchial epithelial cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 178:
144-154. 024599
Veronesi Bi Makwana Oi Pooler Mi Chen LC. (2005). Effects of subchronic exposures to concentrated
ambient particles VII Degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in Apo E7- mice. Inhal Toxicol, 17:
235-241. 087481
Veronesi Bi Oortgiesen M. (2001). Neurogenic inflammation and particulate matter (PM) air pollutants.
Neurotoxicology, 22: 795-810. 015977
Verstraelen Si Van Den Heuvel Ri Nelissen Ii Witters Hi Verheyen Gi Schoeters G. (2005). Flow
cytometric characterisation of antigen presenting dendritic cells after in vitro exposure to diesel
exhaust particles. Toxicol In Vitro, 19: 903-907. 096872
Vogel CFAi Sciullo Ei Wong Pi Kuzmicky Pi Kado Ni Matsumura F. (2005). Induction of
proinflammatory cytokines and C-reactive protein in human macrophage cell line U937 exposed
to air pollution particulates. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 1536-1541. 087891
Walczak-Drzewiecka Ai Wyczolkowska Ji Dastych J. (2003). Environmentally relevant metal and
transition metal ions enhance Fc epsilon RI-mediated mast cell activation. , 111: 708-713.
096784
July 2009
D-209
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Wallenborn JG; Evansky P; Shannahan JH; Vallanat B; Ledbetter AD; Schladweiler MC; Richards JH;
Gottipolu RR; Nyska A; Kodavanti UP. (2008). Subchronic inhalation of zinc sulfate induces
cardiac changes in healthy rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 232- 69"77. 191171
Wallenborn JG; McGee John K; Schladweiler Mette C; Ledbetter Allen D; Kodavanti Urmila P. (2007).
Systemic translocation of particulate matter-associated metals following a single intratracheal
instillation in rats. J Toxicol Sci, 98- 231-239. 156144
Wan ECH; Yu JZ. (2006). Determination of sugar compounds in atmospheric aerosols by liquid
chromatography combined with positive electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J
Chromatogr, 1107: 175-181. 157104
Wang Y-Z; Ingram JL; Walters DM; Rice AB; Santos JH; Van Houten B; Bonner JC. (2003). Vanadium-
induced STAT-1 activation in lung myofibroblasts requires H202 and P38 MAP kinase. Free
Radic Biol Med, 35: 845-855. 157106
Watanabe N. (2005). Decreased number of sperms and Sertoli cells in mature rats exposed to diesel
exhaust as fetuses. Toxicol Lett, 155: 51-58. 087985
Wegesser TC; Last JA. (2008). Lung response to coarse PM: bioassay in mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol,
230: 159-166. 190506
Wellenius GA; Batalha JRF; Diaz EA; Lawrence J; Coull BA; Katz T; Verrier RL; Godleski JJ. (2004).
Cardiac effects of carbon monoxide and ambient particles in a rat model of myocardial infarction.
Toxicol Sci, 80: 367-376. 087874
Wellenius GA; Coull BA; Batalha JRF; Diaz EA; Lawrence J; Godleski JJ. (2006). Effects of ambient
particles and carbon monoxide on supraventricular arrhythmias in a rat model of myocardial
infarction. Inhal Toxicol, 18: 1077-1082. 156152
Wellenius GA; Coull BA; Godleski JJ; Koutrakis P; Okabe K; Savage ST. (2003). Inhalation of
concentrated ambient air particles exacerbates myocardial ischemia in conscious dogs. Environ
Health Perspect, 111: 402-408. 055691
Whitekus MJ; Li N; Zhang M; Wang M; Horwitz MA; Nelson SK; Horwitz LD; Brechun N; Diaz-
Sanchez D; Nel AE. (2002). Thiol antioxidants inhibit the adjuvant effects of aerosolized diesel
exhaust particles in a murine model for ovalbumin sensitization. , 168: 2560-2567. 157142
Wichers LB; Nolan JP; Winsett DW; Ledbetter AD; Kodavanti UP; Schladweiler MCJ; Costa DL;
Watkinson WP. (2004). Effects of instilled combustion-derived particles in spontaneously
hypertensive rats Part II: pulmonary responses. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 407-419. 055636
Wichers LB; Rowan WH, 3rd; Nolan JP; Ledbetter AD; McGee JK; Costa DL; Watkinson WP. (2006).
Particle deposition in spontaneously hypertensive rats exposed via whole-body inhalation:
measured and estimated dose. , 93: 400-10. 103806
Wilson MR; Foucaud L; Barlow PG; Hutchison GR; Sales J; Simpson RJ; Stone V. (2007). Nanoparticle
interactions with zinc and iron: Implications for toxicology and inflammation. Toxicol Appl
Pharmacol, 225: 80-89. 097268
Win-Shwe TT; Yamamoto S; Fujitani Y; Hirano S; Fujimaki H. (2008). Spatial learning and memory
function-related gene expression in the hippocampus of mouse exposed to nanoparticle-rich
diesel exhaust. Neurotoxicology, 29: 940-947. 190146
Witten ML; Wong SS ; Sun NN; Keith I; Kweon C; Foster DE; Schauer JJ; Sherrill DL. (2005).
Neurogenic responses in rat lungs after nose-only exposure to diesel exhaust. 087485
Wold LE; Simkhovich BZ; Kleinman MT; Nordlie MA; Dow JS; Sioutas C; Kloner RA. (2006). In vivo
and in vitro models to test the hypothesis of particle "induced effects on cardiac function and
arrhythmias. Cardiovasc Toxicol, 6: 69"78. 097028
Wong SS; Sun NN; Keith I; Kweon C"B; Foster DE; Schauer James J; Witten ML. (2003). Tachykinin
substance P signaling involved in diesel exhaust-induced bronchopulmonary neurogenic
inflammation in rats. , 77: 638-650. 097707
Wottrich R; Diabate S; Krug HF. (2004). Biological effects of ultrafine model particles in human
macrophages and epithelial cells in mono- and co-culture. Int J Hyg Environ Health, 207: 353"
361. 094518
Wu W; Samet JM; Silbajoris R; Dailey LA; Sheppard D; Bromberg PA; Graves LM. (2004). Heparin-
binding epidermal growth factor cleavage mediates zinc-induced epidermal growth factor
receptor phosphorylation. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol, 30: 540-7. 096949
Wu W; Silbajoris RA; Whang YE; Graves LM; Bromberg PA; Samet JM. (2005). p38 and EGF receptor
kinase-mediated activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway is required for
Zn2+"induced cyclooxygenase-2 expression. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, 289: L883-9.
097350
July 2009
D-210
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Wu YH; Vincent JH. (2007). A modified Marple-type cascade impactor for assessing aerosol particle size
distributions in workplaces. J Occup Environ Hyg, 4- 798-807. 098412
Xu D-Q; Zhang W-L. (2004). Monitoring of pollution of air fine particles (PM25) and study on their
genetic toxicity. ,17: 452-458. 097231
Yacobi NR; Phuleria HC; Demaio Li Liang CH; Peng CA; Sioutas C> Borok Z; Kim KJ; Crandall ED.
(2007). Nanoparticle effects on rat alveolar epithelial cell monolayer barrier properties. Toxicol
In Vitro, 21: 1373-1381. 156166
Yamamoto Si Tin Tin Win Si Ahmed Si Kobayashi Ti Fujimaki H. (2006). Effect of ultrafine carbon
black particles on lipoteichoic acid-induced early pulmonary inflammation in BALB/c mice.
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 213: 256-266. 096671
Yanagisawa Ri Takano Hi Inoue Ki Ichinose Ti Sadakane Ki Yoshino Si Yamaki Ki Kumagai Yi
Uchiyama Ki Yoshikawa Ti Morita M. (2003). Enhancement of acute lung injury related to
bacterial endotoxin by components of diesel exhaust particles. Thorax, 58: 605-612. 087487
Yanagisawa Ri Takano Hi Inoue Kli Ichinose Ti Sadakane Ki Yoshino Si Yamaki Ki Yoshikawa Ti
Hayakawa K. (2006). Components of diesel exhaust particles differentially affect Thl/Th2
response in a murine model of allergic airway inflammation. , 36: 386-395. 096458
Yang C-Yi Tseng Y"Ti Chang C-C. (2003). Effects of air pollution on birthweight among children born
between 1995 and 1997 in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 66: 807-816. 087886
Yatera Ki Hsieh Ji Hogg James Ci Tranfield Ei Suzuki Hi Shih C"Hi Behzad Ali Ri Vincent Ri van
Eeden Stephan F. (2008). Particulate matter air pollution exposure promotes recruitment of
monocytes into atherosclerotic plaques. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 294: H944-H953.
157162
Yauk Ci Polyzos A> Rowan-Carroll Ai Somers CM; Godschalk RW! Van Schooten FJ; Berndt ML;
Pogribny IP; Koturbash I; Williams A; Douglas GR; Kovalchuk O. (2008). Germ-line mutations,
DNA damage, and global hypermethylation in mice exposed to particulate air pollution in an
urban/industrial location. , 105: 605-610. 157164
Yin H; Too HP; Chow GM. (2005). The effects of particle size and surface coating on the cytotoxicity of
nickel ferrite. Biomaterials, 26: 5818-5826. 088133
Yin X-J; Schafer R; Ma JYC; Antonini JM; Roberts JR; Weissman DN; Siegel PD; Ma JKH. (2003).
Alteration of pulmonary immunity to Listeria monocytogenes by diesel exhaust particles (DEPs)
II Effects of DEPs on T-cell-mediated immune responses in rats. , 111: 524-530. 096127
Yin XJ; Dong CC; Ma JYC; Antonini JM; Roberts JR; Stanley CF; Schafer R; Ma JKH. (2004).
Suppression of cell-mediated immune responses to listeria infection by repeated exposure to
diesel exhaust particles in brown Norway rats. , 77: 263-271. 097685
Yin XJ; Ma JYC; Antonini JM; Castranova V; Ma JKH. (2004). Roles of reactive oxygen species and
heme oxygenase-1 in modulation of alveolar macrophage-mediated pulmonary immune
responses to listeria monocytogenes by diesel exhaust particles. Toxicol Sci, 82: 143-153. 087983
Yokohira M; Takeuchi H; Yamakawa K; Saoo K; Matsuda Y; Zeng Y; Hosokawa K; Imaida K. (2007).
Bioassay by intratracheal instillation for detection of lung toxicity due to fine particles in F344
male rats. Exp Toxicol Pathol, 58: 211-21. 097976
Yokota S; Furuya M; Seki T; Marumo H; Ohara N; Kato A. (2004). Delayed exacerbation of acute
myocardial ischemia/reperfusion-induced arrhythmia by tracheal instillation of diesel exhaust
particles. , 16: 319-331. 096516
Yokota S; Mizuo K; Moriya N; Oshio S; Sugawara I; Takeda K. (2009). Effect of prenatal exposure to
diesel exhaust on dopaminergic system in mice. Neurosci Lett, 449: 38-41. 190518
Yokota S; Seki T; Furuya M; Ohara N. (2005). Acute functional enhancement of circulatory neutrophils
after intratracheal instillation with diesel exhaust particles in rats. , 17: 671-679. 096003
Yokota S; Seki T; Naito Y; Tachibana S; Hirabayashi N; Nakasaka T; Ohara N; Kobayashi H. (2008).
Tracheal instillation of diesel exhaust particles component causes blood and pulmonary
neutrophilia and enhances myocardial oxidative stress in mice. J Toxicol Sci, 33: 609-620.
190109
Yoshida S; Ono N> Tsukue N> Oshio S; Umeda T; Takano H; Takeda K. (2006). In utero exposure to
diesel exhaust increased accessory reproductive gland weight and serum testosterone
concentration in male mice. , 13: 139-147. 097015
Yoshida S; Takedab K. (2004). The effects of diesel exhaust on murine male reproductive function. Eisei
Kagaku, 50: 210-4. 097760
Yoshida S; Yoshida M; Sugawara I; Takeda K. (2006). Mice strain differences in effects of fetal exposure
to diesel exhaust gas on male gonadal differentiation. , 13: 117-123. 156170
July 2009
D-211
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Yun Y-P; Joo J-D; Lee J-Y; Nam H-Y; Kim Y-H; Lee K-H; Lim C-S; Kim H-J; Lim Y-G; Lim Y. (2005).
Induction of nuclear factor-"kappa"B activation through TAK1 and NIK by diesel exhaust
particles in L2 cell lines. Toxicol Lett, 155- 337-342. 088302
Zanchi AC; Venturini CD; Saiki M; Nascimento Saldiva PH; Tannhauser Barros HM! Rhoden CR.
(2008). Chronic nasal instillation of residual-oil fly ash (ROFA) induces brain lipid peroxidation
and behavioral changes in rats. Inhal Toxicol, 20: 795-800. 157173
Zelikoff JT; Chen LC; Cohen MD! Fang K; Gordon Ti Li Y; Nadziejko C> Schlesinger RB. (2003). Effects
of inhaled ambient particulate matter on pulmonary antimicrobial immune defense. Inhal
Toxicol, 15: 131-150. 039009
Zelikoff JT; Schermerhorn KR; Fang K; Cohen MD; Schlesinger RB. (2002). A role for associated
transition metals in the immunotoxicity of inhaled ambient particulate matter. Environ Health
Perspect, 5: 871-875. 037797
Zhang J; Ghio AJ; Chang W', Kamdar O; Rosen GD; Upadhyay D. (2007). Bim mediates mitochondria-
regulated particulate matter-induced apoptosis in alveolar epithelial cells. FEBS Lett, 581:
4148-4152. 156179
Zhang Q; Kleeberger SR; Reddy SP. (2004). DEP-induced fra-1 expression correlates with a distinct
activation of AP-1 "dependent gene transcription in the lung. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol
Physiol, 286: L427-436. 157183
Zhang Z; Che W; Liang Y; Wu M; Li N; Shu Y; Liu F; Wu D. (2007). Comparison of cytotoxicity and
genotoxicity induced by the extracts of methanol and gasoline engine exhausts. Toxicol In Vitro,
21: 1058-1065. 157186
Zhao H; Barger MW; Ma JKH; Castranova V; Ma JYC. (2006). Cooperation of the inducible nitric oxide
synthase and cytochrome P450 1A1 in mediating lung inflammation and mutagenicity induced
by diesel exhaust particles. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 1253-1258. 100996
Zhao L; Wang X; He Q; Wang H; Sheng G; Chan LY; Fu J; Blake DR. (2004). Exposure to hazardous
volatile organic compounds, PM sub(lO) and CO while walking along streets in urban
Guangzhou, China. Atmos Environ, 38: 6177-6184. 100972
Zhong W; Levin L; Reponen T; Hershey GK; Adhikari A; Shukla R; LeMasters G. (2006). Analysis of
short-term influences of ambient aeroallergens on pediatric asthma hospital visits. Sci Total
Environ, 370: 330-336. 093264
Zhou Y-M; Zhong C"Y; Kennedy IM; Pinkerton KE. (2003). Pulmonary responses of acute exposure to
ultrafine iron particles in healthy adult rats. Environ Toxicol, 18: 227-235. 087940
July 2009
D-212
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Annex E. Epidemiologic Studies
E.1. Short-Term Exposure and Cardiovascular Outcomes
E.I.1. Cardiovascular Morbidity Studies
Table E-1 Short-term exposure - cardiovascular morbidity outcomes - PM10
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Baccarelli et al. (2007,
091310)
Outcome: Fasting and postmethionine-
load total homocysteine (tHcy)
Period of Study: Jan 1995 - Aug 2005 Age Groups: 11 -84 yrs
Location: Lombardia region, Italy Study Design: Cross-sectional I Panel
N: 1,213 participants
Statistical Analyses: Generalized
additive models
Covariates: age, sex, BMI, smoking,
alcohol, hormone use, temperature, day
of the year, and long-term trends
Season: Adjusted for long-term trends to
account for season
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: R v2.2.1
Lags Considered: 1 d, 7d moving avg.
Pollutant: PMio (some TSP measures
used to predict PMio)
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): NR
Percentiles: 25th: 20.1
50th: 34.1
75th: 52.6
Max: 390.0
Monitoring Stations: 53
Copollutant: CO, NO2, SO2, O3
PM Increment: IQR
Percent Change: [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Homocysteine, fasting: 0.4 (-2.4, 3.3)
Homocysteine, postmethionine-load: 1.1
(-1.5, 3.7)
Percent Change: per 25.7m3 increase
in 7-day moving avg of PMio
Homocysteine, fasting: 1.0 (-1.9, 3.9)
Homocysteine, postmethionine-load: 2.0
(-0.6, 4.7)
Percent Change: on fasting
homocysteine per IQR increase in 24-
h PMio levels
Among smokers: 6.2 (0.0,12.7)
Among non-smokers: -1.6 (-5.5, 2.5)
Percent Change: on postmethionine-
load homocysteine per IQR increase in
24-h PMio levels: Among smokers: 6.0
(0.5,11.8)
Among non-smokers: -0.1 (-3.6, 3.5)
Reference: Baccarelli et al. (2007,
090733) Period of Study: Jan 1995 -
Aug 2005
Location: Lombardia region Italy
Outcome: Prothrombin time (PT)
Activated partial thromboplastin time
(APTT)
Fibrinogen
Functional antithrombin
Functional protein C
Protein C, antigen
Functional protein S
Free protein S
Age Groups: 11 -84 yrs
Study Design: Cross-sectional I Panel
N: 1,218 participants
Statistical Analyses: Generalized
additive models
Covariates: Age, sex, BMI, smoking,
alcohol, hormone use, temperature, day
of the year, and long-term trends
Season: Adjusted for long-term trends to
account for season
Pollutant: PMio (some TSP measures
used to predict PMio)
Averaging Time: Hourly concentrations
used to calculate lags of same day, 7-
day, 30-day, and h 0-6
Mean (SD): NR
Percentiles:
Sep-Nov: 2
5th: 33.1
50th: 51.2
75th: 76.5
Max: 148.9
Dec-Feb:
25th: 47.9
50th: 68.5
75th: 95.3
Max: 238.3
Mar-May:
25th: 30.0
50th: 64.1
75th: 64.8
Max: 158.5
PM Increment: SD
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Estimated changes in endpoint
PT (international normalized ratio):
At time of blood sample: -0.06 (-0.12,
0.00)
Avg levels 7 days prior: -0.03 (-0.10,
0.04)
Avg levels 30 days prior: -0.08 (-0.14, ¦
0.01)
(Hourly moving Avgs presented in Fig 2)
APTT (ratio to reference plasma):
At time of blood sample: 0.02 (-0.04,
0.08)
Avg levels 7 days prior: 0.00 (-0.07,
0.06)
Avg levels 30 days prior: 0.01 (-0.06,
0.08)
Fibrinogen:
At time of blood sample: 0.01 (-0.05,
0.07)
Avg levels 7 days prior: -0.03 (-0.09,
0.04)
July 2009
E-1
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: R software v2.2.1
Jun-Aug:
25th: 28.0
50th: 44.3
75th: 61.3
Max: 94.7
Monitoring Stations: 53 sites
Copollutant: CO, NO2, SO2, O3
Avg levels 30 days prior: -0.02 (-0.09,
0.05)
Functional antithrombin:
At time of blood sample: -0.02 (-0.09,
0.04)
Avg levels 7 days prior: -0.06 (-0.13,
0.01)
Avg levels 30 days prior: -0.06 (-0.13,
0.02)
Functional protein C:
At time of blood sample: 0.00 (-0.06, 6.1)
Avg levels 7 days prior: -0.06 (-0.12,
0.01)
Avg levels 30 days prior: -0.06 (-0.14,
0.01)
Protein C, antigen:
At time of blood sample: 0.00 (-0.06, 6.0)
Avg levels 7 days prior: -0.04 (-0.10,
0.03)
Avg levels 30 days prior: -0.06 (-0.14,
0.01)
Functional protein S:
At time of blood sample: 0.04 (-0.03,
0.10)
Avg levels 7 days prior: -0.03 (-0.11,
0.06)
Avg levels 30 days prior: -0.14 (-0.23, ¦
0.05)
Free protein S:
At time of blood sample: 0.05 (-0.01,
0.10)
Avg levels 7 days prior: 0.01 (-0.05,
0.07)
Avg levels 30 days prior: -0.01 (-0.08,
0.06)
July 2009
E-2
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Barclay et al.
(2009,179935)
Period of Study: Jan 2003 - May 2005
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
Outcome: Haematological outcomes,
Heart Rhythm outcomes, & Heart Rate
Variability outcomes
Age Groups: 70.4 (8.9)
Study Design: panel
N: 132 patients wf chronic heart failure
Statistical Analyses: Linear & Mixed
Effects Regression Model
Covariates: age, temperature, humidity,
pressure
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: lags 0-2d
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: daily
Mean (SD): 20.25
Min: 7.375
Max: 68.3
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant: PM2.6, PNC, NO2
Co-pollutant Correlation
NO2 city: 0.294
NO city: 0.112
NO2 personal: 0.055
PNC DE0M: 0.241
PM2.6 total: 0.476*
PM2.6 traffic: 0.882*
PNC total: 0.125
PNC traffic: 0.190
"correlations based on 3-day average
concentrations
PM Increment: NR
Beta (Lower CI, Upper CI):
Haemoglobin: 0.136 (-0.274, 0.546)
Mean corpuscular haemoglobin: 0.030 (¦
0.232,0.291)
Platelets: 0.096 (-0.923,1.115)
Haematocrit: 0.131 (-0.289, 0.551)
White blood cells: 0.034 (-1.175,1.244)
C reactive protein: -4.872 (-12.094,
2.351)
IL-6: 2.207 (-4.995, 9.410)
von Willebrand factor: 0.660 (-2.651,
3.970)
E-selectin:-0.536 (-2.528,1.457)
Fibrinogen:-0.432 (-2.470,1.607)
Factor VII: 0.990 (-1.265, 3.245)
d-dimer: -1.225 (-4.505, 2.055)
All arrhythmias: -3.447 (-11.521,4.627)
Ventricular ectopic beats: -2.110 (-
12.135,7.915)
Ventricular couplets: -1.561 (-10.811,
7.689)
Ventricular runs: -0.709 (-6.677, 5.259)
Supraventricular ectopic beats: 0.033 (¦
9.242, 9.308)
Supraventricular couplets: 0.006 (-8.618,
8.629)
Supraventricular runs: 3.710 (-2.847,
10.266)
Average HR: 0.321 (-0.197,0.838)
24h SDNN: 1.040 (-0.415, 2.494)
24h SDANN: 1.195 (-0.473, 2.863)
24h RMSSD: 0.321 (-0.197,0.838)
24h PNN: 2.837 (-3.791, 9.465)
24h LF power: 0583 (-3.622,4.787)
24h LF normalized:-3.137 (-5.540, -
0.733)*
24h HF power: 0.872 (-4.649, 6.392)
24h HF normalized: -2.223 (-4.952,
0.505)
24h LF/HF ratio: -0.296 (-3.832, 3.240)
*p< 0.05
Notes: LF - low frequency
HF- high frequency
Reference: Briet et al. (2007, 093049)
Period of Study: NR
Location: Paris, France
Outcome: Endothelial Function
Age Groups: 20-40 yrs
Study Design: panel
N: 40 white male nonsmokers
Statistical Analyses: Multiple Robust
Regrssion
Covariates: R53R/R53H genotype, diet,
subject factor, visit, temperature
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NCSS
Lags Considered: 0-5d
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24h
5 d Mean (SD): 43 (10)
Monitoring Stations: NR
Co-pollutant: PM2.6, SO2, NO, NO2, CO
Co-pollutant Correlation
n/a
PM Increment: 1 SD
Beta (Lower CI, Upper CI), P, R2:
Flow-mediated brachial artery dilation:
0.07 (-0.62, 0.76), NS, 0.03
Reactive hyperemia:
15.91 (7.74,24.0), <0.001,0.16
July 2009
E-3
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Choi et al (2007, 093196)
Period of Study: 2001-2003
Location: Incheon, South Korea
Outcome: Blood pressure
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 10459 subjects with a hospital health
examination
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression
Covariates: Season: Effect modification
by season
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: Measured hourly and
calculated 24-h means
Percentiles: Warm season: Median: 36.7
Cold season: Median: 45.7
Monitoring Stations: 9 stations
Copollutant: NO2, SO2
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Estimate (p-value) for the relationship
between systolic blood pressure (SBP)
and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and an
increase in PM10 on lag day 1
SBP: Warm season: 0.0798 (p < 0.001)
DBP: Warm season: 0.0240 (p< 0.001)
Note: No evidence of associations
between PM10 and BP during the cold
season
Reference: Chuang et al. (2007,
091063)
Period of Study: Between Apr-Jun 2004
or 2005
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Outcome: High-sensitivity C-reactive
protein (hs-CRP)
Fibrinogen, plasminogen activator fibrin-
ogen inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), tissue-type plas-
minogen activator (tPA), 8-hydroxy-2'-
deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), and log-
transformed HRV indices (SDNN - stan-
dard deviation of NN intervals, r-
MSSD - square root of the mean of the
sum of the squares of differences
between adjacent NN intervals, LF - low
frequency [0.04-0.15Hz], and HF - high
frequency [0.15-0.40Hzj)
Age Groups: 18-25 yrs
Study Design: Panel (cross-sectional)
N: 76 students
Statistical Analyses: linear mixed-
effects models
Covariates: Age, sex, BMI, weekday,
temperature of previous day, relative
humidity
Season: Only 1 season of data collection
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: Hourly data used to
calculate averages over 1-3 day periods
Mean (SD): 1 -day avg: 49.2 (18.0)
2-day avg: 55.3 (18.6)
3-day avg: 54.9 (18.2)
Range (Min, Max): 1 -day avg: 29.5,
83.4
2-day avg: 25.5, 85.1
3-day avg: 22.2, 87.2
Monitoring Stations: 2 sites (each
pollutant measured at one site only)
PM Increment: IQR (1-d avg: 32.7
2-day avg: 34.5
3-day avg: 26.0)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper Cl[:
% change in health endpoint per increase
in IQR of PM10 (1-3 day averaging period
single pollutant models)
hs-CRP: 1-d: 135.8(1.8,269.7)
2-d: 108.2 (-10.9, 227.3)
3 d: 109.6 (2.5, 216.7)
8-OHdG: 1-d: -9.2 (-21.5, 3.2)
2-d:-6.1 (-17.0,4.8)
3-d: -5.6 (-13.8, 2.6)
Copollutant: PM2.6, Sulfate, Nitrate, 0C, 1-d; 30.0 (12.4,47.7)
EC, NO?, CO, SO2, 0s 2-d: 19.1 (3.6, 34.7)
3 d: 21.2 (9.7, 32.8)
tPA: 1-d: 16.0 (-4.1, 36.2)
2-d: 10.4 (-6.3, 27.2)
3 d: 8.8 (-2.8, 20.5)
Fibrinogen: 1-d: 5.3 (1.5,15.2)
2-d: 1.5 (-4.4, 7.5)
3 d: 3.3 (-1.1, 7.7)
Heart Rate Variability
SDNN: 1-d: -4.9 (-7.8, -2.1)
2-d: -4.0 (-6.6,-1.4)
3-d: -4.1 (-6.1, -2.2)
r-MSSD: 1-d: -4.8 (-12.3, 2.7)
2-d: -2.2 (-9.0, 4.7)
3-d: -4.0 (-9.0, 0.9)
LF: 1-d:-6.1 (-10.1,-2.1)
2-d: -3.0 (-7.2,1.2)
3 d: -4.3 (-7.0,-1.6)
HF: 1-d: -5.5 (-13.0, 2.1)
2-d: -2.7 (-9.5, 4.1)
3-d: -2.0 (-7.2, 3.2)
July 2009
E-4
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ebelt et al. (2005, 056907)
Period of Study: Summer of 1998
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Outcome: CVD
Age Groups: range from 54-86 yrs
mean age - 74 years
Study Design: extended analysis of a
repeated-measures panel study
N: 16 persons with COPD
Statistical Analyses:
Earlier analysis expanded by developing
mixed-effect regression models and by
evaluating additional exposure indicators
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS V8
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD):
Ambient PMio: 17 ± 6
Exposure to ambient PMio: 10.3 ± 4.6
Range (Min, Max): Ambient PM102E: 7 -
36
Exposure to ambient PMio-2.b: 1.5 ¦ 23.8
Monitoring Stations: 5
Copollutant (correlation):
Ambient concentrations and exposure to
ambient PM were highly correlated for
each respective metric: r a 0.71
PMio-2.b: r 2 0.72
PM2.b: r> 0.92
Note: Total personal fine particle
exposure (T) were dominated by
exposures to non ambient particles which
were not correlated with ambient fine
particle exposure (A) or ambient
concentrations (C). Results for each of
these metrics are listed.
Effect estimates and 95% CI for IQR
range increases in exposure
Increment: C,G: IQR - 7//g|m3
SBP (mm Hg): -2.2 (-4.78-0.38)
DBP (mm Hg):-0.78 (-2.65-1.09)
Ln-SVE (bph): 0.16 (-0.07-0.40)
HR (bpm): 1.02 (-0.79-2.82)
SDNN(ms):-2.14 (-6.94-2.65)
R-MSSD (ms):-2.24 (-4.27-0.21)
Increment: A10: IQR - 6.5/yg/m3
SBP (mm Hg): -2.81 (-5.67-0.05)
DBP (mm Hg):-0.59 (-2.79-1.62)
Ln-SVE (bph): 0.27 (0.03-0.52)
HR (bpm): 0.86 (-1.61-3.33)
SDNN (ms):-3.91 (-9.73-1.91)
R-MSSD (ms): -0.81 (-4.94-3.31)
Reference: Folino et al. (2009,191902) Outcome: HRV & Inflammatory Markers
Period of Study: Jun 2006 - May 2007 Age Groups: 45-65 yrs
Location: Padua, Italy
Study Design: panel
N: 39 patients wf myocardial infarction
Statistical Analyses: Linear Regression
Model, AN0VA
Covariates: temperature, relative
humidity, atmospheric pressure, beta-
blocker, aspirin, or nitrate consumption,
smoking habit
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: Stata
Lags Considered: NR
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean (SD):
Summer: 46.4 (16.1)
Winter: 73.0 (30.9)
Spring: 38.3 (15.4)
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: PM2.6, PM0.26
Co-pollutant Correlation
NR
PM Increment: 1 //g|m3
Beta (SE), p-value:
SDNN: 0.115(0.093), 0.218
SDANN: 0.138 (0.103), 0.182
RMSSD: 0.049 (0.0341,0.146
pH: 0.002 (0.0011,0.033
LTB4: 0.427(0.0279), 0.126
eNO: 0.000 (0.002), 0.851
PTX3:-0.003 (0.001), 0.033
C-reactive protein: -0.006 (0.004), 0.161
CC16:-0.002 (0.002), 0.280
IL-8: 0.000 (0.003), 0.895
Reference: Forbes et al. (2009,190351) Outcome: Inflammation Markers
Period of Study: 1994,1998, 2003 Age Groups: 16+ yrs
Location: England
Study Design: cross-sectional
N: 25,000 white adults wf fibrinogen
measurements & 17,000 white adults w/
C-reactive protein measurements
Statistical Analyses: Multilevel Linear
Regression Models
Covariates: age, sex, BMI, social class,
region, cigarette smoking
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: Stata
Lags Considered: NR
Pollutant: PMio
PM Increment: 1 //g|m3
Averaging Time: yearly
Percent Change (Lower CI, Upper CI):
1994
Fibrinogen
Median: 19.5
1994 Crude:-0.068 (-0.367,0.231)
Range: 12.5-36.1
1994 Adjusted: 0.080 (-0.164, 0.326)
IQR: 3.7
1998 Crude:-0.592 (-0.902,-0.280)
1998
1998 Adjusted: -0.388 (-0.727, -0.047)
2003 Crude:-0.339 (-0.696, 0.019)
Median: 17.9
2003 Adjusted: -0.069 (-0.458, 0.322)
Range: 12.6-27.0
Combined:-0.077 (-0.254, 0.100)
IQR: 2.7
2003
C-reactive protein
1998 Crude:-0.914 (-2.206, 0.395)
Median: 16.2
1998 Adjusted:-0.266 (-1.782,1.274)
Range: 11.0-22.7
2003 Crude: 0.286 (-1.327,1.925)
IQR: 2.6
2003 Adjusted: 0.661 (-1.068, 2.421)
Monitoring Stations: NR
Combined: 0.140 (-1.003,1.296)
Copollutant: NO2, SO2, O3
Co-pollutant Correlation
n/a
July 2009
E-5
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Kaufman (1987,190960)
Period of Study: Nov 2004 ¦ 2005
Location: Isfahan, Iran
Outcome: Inflammation
Age Groups: 10-18 yrs
Study Design: panel
N: 374 children
Statistical Analyses: Linear Regression,
Logistic Regression
Covariates: age, gender, BMI, waist
circumference, healthy eating index,
physical activity level
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SPSS
Lags Considered: 0-7d avg
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean (SD): 122.08 (33.63)
0": 11.00
25": 86.50
50": 153.0
75": 191.00
Monitoring Stations: 3
Copollutant: 0:i, SO2, NO2, CO
Co-pollutant Correlation
NR
PM Increment: NR
Beta |SE):
CRP: 1.5(0.2)
Ox-LDL: 1.4 (0.1)
MDA: 1.3 (0.1)
CDE: 1.1 (0.1)
H0MA-IR: 1.1 (0.3)
Reference: Liao et al. (2004, 056590)
Period of Study: 1996-1998
Location: ARIC study cohort (Washing-
ton County, MD
Forsyth County, NC
and selected suburbs of Minneapolis,
MN).
The 4th quarter of the ARIC cohort was
sampled exclusively from black residents
of Jackson, MS.
Outcome: 5-min HR, HRV indices (HF, LF,
SDNN)
Study Design: Cross-sectional
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24-h
Mean (SD): 24.3(11.5)
Copollutant: O3
CO
SO?
NO?
PM Increment: SD
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Estimate (SE)
HF:-0.06 ms2 (0.018)
SDNN:-1.03 ms (0.31)
H: 0.32 beats/min (0.158)
Reference: Liao et al. (2005, 088677)
Period of Study: 1987-1989 baseline
health exam
Location: 3 centers in the US (Forsyth
County, NC
suburbs of Minneapolis, MN
black residents of Jackson, MS)
Outcome: Fibrinogen, factor VIII co-
agulant activity (Vlll-C), von Willebrand
factor (vWF), white blood cell count
(WBC), and serum albumin
Age Groups: 45-64 yrs
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 10,208 participants (7705 for PM)
Statistical Analyses: Multiple linear
regression
Covariates: Age, sex, ethnicity-center,
education, smoking, drinking status, BMI,
history of chronic respiratory disease,
humidity, season, cloud cover, and
temperature
Dose-response Investigated?
Yes, examined higher-ordered terms for
each pollutant
Statistical Package: SAS v8.2
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24-h averages (1, 2,
and 3 days prior to the exam)
Mean (SD): 29.9 (29.9)
Mean (SD) within Quartiles:
Q1-3: 24.0(6.96)
Q4: 47.3(10.11)
Copollutant:
CO, SO2, N02,0s
PM Increment: 1 SD (12.8/yg/m3)
Effect Estimate: Adjusted regression
coefficient (SE): Fibrinogen (mg/dl): 0.163
(0.755)
Factor Vlll-C (%): Non-linear association:
P (PM 10) --5.30, p< 0.01
P (PM10)2 - 0.80, p< 0.05
vWF (%): Diabetics: 3.93 (1.80)
Nondiabetics: -0.54 (0.58)
Albumin (g/dl): CVD: -0.006 (0.003)
Non-CVD: 0.029 (0.017)
p < 0.05
July 2009
E-6
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Liao et al. (2007,180272)
Period of Study: 1999-2004
Location: 24 US states
Outcome: Ectopy
Age Groups: women 50-79 yrs
Study Design: panel
N: 57,422
Statistical Analyses: logistic regression
& random effects modeling
Covariates: age, race, center, education,
history of CVD/chronic lung disease, rel.
humidity, temperature, smoking
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS, Stata
Lags Considered: lags 0-365d
Monitors used in model for spatial
interpolation of daily PM values.
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: daily
Mean (SD)*:
All: 27.5 (12.1)
No Ectopy: 27.5(12.1)
Any Ectopy: 27.5 (11.9)
5"1, 95"1 percentile*:
All: 12.2, 48.9
No Ectopy: 12.3, 48.8
Any Ectopy: 11.8, 49.3
Monitoring Stations: NR*
Copollutant: PM2.6
Co-pollutant Correlation
NR
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3
Percent Change (Lower CI, Upper CI):
All Ventricular Ectopy
Lag 0:1.01 (0.95,1.07)
Lag 1:1.02 (0.96,1.09)
Lag 2: 0.99 (0.93,1.06)
Current Smoker Ventricular Ectopy
Lag 0:1.21 (0.96,1.53)
Lag 1:1.32 (1.07,1.65)
Lag 2: 1.22 (0.95,1.56)
Nonsmoker Ventricular Ectopy
LagO: 1 (0.93,1.06)
Lag 1: 1.01 (0.94,1.07)
Lag 2: 0.98 (0.92,1.05)
All Supraventricular Ectopy
LagO: 1 (0.95,1.06)
Lag 1:1 (0.95,1.05)
Lag 2: 0.99 (0.94,1.04)
All Ventricular or Supraventricular Ectopy
Lag 0:1 (0.95,1.04)
Lag 1:1 (0.96,1.04)
Lag 2: 0.98 (0.94,1.02)
Reference: Liu et al. (2007,156705)
Period of Study: May 24, 2005-Jul 8,
2005
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Outcome: Heart rate, blood pressure,
brachial arterial diameter, flow-mediated
vasodilatation (FMD), plasma cytokines,
and thiobarbituric acid reactive
substances (TBARS)
Age Groups: 18-65 yrs
Study Design: Panel
N: 24 nonsmoking subjects with type I or
II diabetes over a 7 week period (2-14
visits for subjects)
170 total vascular measurements and
134 total blood samples collected
Statistical Analyses: Mixed effects
regression models
Covariates: (time-dependent covariates)
Daily temperature, relative humidity,
blood glucose level, also checked for
confounding by ambient air pollutant
concentrations (controlled for ambient
PM2.B)
Season: No adjustment since testing
was completed within a 7 week period
during early summer
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: S-Plus
Pollutant: PMio (personal)
Averaging Time: Real-time monitor
measured exposure during 24-h period
prior to clinic measures
Median (5th-95th percentile): 0-24 hrs:
25.5 (9.8-133.0)
0-6hrs: 15.3 (5.3-83.2)
7-12hrs: 17.0 (7.1-186.3)
13-18hrs: 28.5 (11.4-167.0)
19-24 hrs: 30.5 (10.1-148.2)
Monitoring Stations: Personal
monitoring
Copollutant (correlation): Ambient
PM2.6 (r - 0.34)
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
"p < 0.05
"p <0.10. Regression coefficients (SE)
End-diastolic basal diameter (/jm): All
subjects (n — 24): -2.52 (3.27)
subjects not taking vasoactive meds
(n-17):-3.93 (3.66)
subjects w/BMI £ 29kg/m2 (n -14): 8.85
(5.85)
End-systolic basal diameter |//m): All
subjects (n — 24): -9.02 (3.58)"
subjects not taking vasoactive meds
(n-17):-10.59 (4.36)"
subjects w/BMI £29kg/m2 (n -14): 3.85
(5.49)
End-diastolic FMD (%): All subjects
(n - 24): 0.20 (0.08)"
subjects not taking vasoactive meds
(n-17): 0.23 (0.09)"
subjects w/BMI £29kg/m2 (n — 14): 0.12
(0.05)"
End-systolic FMD (%): All subjects
(n - 24): 0.38 (0.18)"
subjects not taking vasoactive meds
(n-17): 0.51 (0.22)"
subjects w/BMI £ 29kg/m2 (n -14): 0.18
(0.10)*
Flow (cm/s): All subjects (n — 24): -0.16
(0.19)
subjects not taking vasoactive meds
(n-17):-0.48 (0.21)"
subjects w/BMI £ 29kg/m2 (n -14): -0.39
(0.23)*
Heart rate (bpm): All subjects (n — 24):
0.01 (0.11)
subjects not taking vasoactive meds
(n-17):-0.06 (0.12)
subjects w/BMI £ 29kg/m2 (n -14): 0.15
(0.12)
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg): All
subjects (n — 24): 0.19 (0.16)
subjects not taking vasoactive meds
(n-17): 0.40 (0.18)**
July 2009
E-7
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
(0.21)
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg): All
subjects (n — 24): 0.17 (0.19)
subjects not taking vasoactive meds
(n-17): 0.43 (0.24)"
subjects wI BMI £ 29kg/m2 (n — 14): 0.38
(0.24)
CRP (|jg/mL): All subjects (n — 24): 0.11
(0.07)
subjects not taking vasoactive meds
(n-17): 0.10 (0.09)
subjects wI BMI £ 29kg/m2 (n — 14): 0.02
(0.03)
ET-1 (pg/mL): All subjects (n — 24): 0.00
(0.00)
subjects not taking vasoactive meds
(n-17): 0.00 (0.00)
subjects w/BMI £ 29kg/m2 (n -14): 0.00
(0.01)
IL-6 (pg/mL): All subjects (n — 24): 0.00
(0.05)
subjects not taking vasoactive meds
(n-17): 0.01 (0.05)
subjects w/BMI £ 29kg/m2 (n -14): -0.00
(0.03)
TI\IF-a (pg/mL): All subjects (n — 24):
0.03(0.05)
subjects not taking vasoactive meds
(n-17): 0.02 (0.05)
subjects wI BMI £ 29kg/m2 (n — 14): 0.03
(0.08)
TBARS (pmol/mL) All subjects (n - 24):
16.12(4.00)"
subjects not taking vasoactive meds
(n-17): 8.10 (9.18)
subjects wI BMI £ 29kg/m2 (n — 14): ¦
0.28(6.60)
regression coefficients (SE) among
subjects not taking vasoactive
medications, with lag time
End-diastolic basal diameter (/jm): 0-
6 h: 29.91 (10.64)"
7-12 h: 0.72(3.95)
13-18 h:-3.62 (2.80)
19-24 h: -0.57 (1.7)
End-systolic basal diameter (/-/m): 0-6
h: 28.88 (11.22)"
7-12 h:-0.78 (4.58)
13-18 h: -7.70 (3.30)"
19-24 h: -2.87 (2.05)
End-diastolic FMD (%): 0-6 h:-0.12
(0.10)
7-12 h: 0.04 (0.05)
13-18 h: 0.11 (0.03)"
19-24 h: 0.12(0.04)"
End-systolic FMD (%): 0-6 h: 0.36
(0.08)"
7-12 h: 0.48 (0.32)
13-18 h: 0.19(0.06)"
19-24 h: 0.34 (0.13)"
Flow (cm/s): 0-6 h:-0.34 (0.22)
7-12 h: -0.26 (0.27
13-18 h: -0.27 (0.15)"
19-24 h: -0.30 (0.11)"
Heart rate (bpm): 0-6 h: 0.31 (0.13)"
7-12 h: 0.26(0.12)"
13-18 h: 0.01 (0.09)
19-24 h:-0.08 (0.05)
July 2009
E-8
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Lipsett et al. (2006, 088753)
Period of Study: February-May 2000
Location: Coachella Valley, CA
Outcome: HRV parameters: SDNN,
SDANN, r-MSSD, LF, HF, total power,
triangular index (TRII).
Study Design: Panel study
N: 19 non smoking adults with coronary
artery disease
Statistical Analysis: Mixed linear re-
gression models with random effects
parameters
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 2 h
Mean (range): Indio: 23.2 (6.3-90.4)
Palm Springs: 14 (4.7-52)
Monitoring Stations: 2
Copollutant: 0:i
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg): 0-
6 h: -0.29 (0.12)"
7-12 h: 0.24 (0.12)"
13-18 h: 0.46 (0.17)"
19-24 h: 0.18(0.14)
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg): 0-
6 h: -0.65 (0.18)"
7-12 h: 0.17(0.19)
13-18 h: 0.86 (0.24)"
19-24 h: 0.11 (0.10)
CRP (|jg/mL): 0-6 h: 0.15(0.13)
7-12 h: 0.15(0.13)
13-18 h: 0.03 (0.06)
19-24 h: 0.04 (0.03)
ET-1 (pg/mL): 0-6 h: 0.02(0.00)": 7-12
h: -0.00 (0.00)
13-18 h:-0.00 (0.00)
19-24 h: 0.00 (0.00)
IL-6 (pg/mL): 0-6 h: 0.03 (0.06)
7-12 h: 0.00(0.06)
13-18 h: 0.02 (0.03)
19-24 h: 0.00 (0.02)
TNF-a (pg/mL): 0-6 h: 0.01 (0.07)
7-12 h: 0.09(0.04)"
13-18 h: 0.01 (0.04)
19-24 h: -0.00 (0.03)
TBARS (pmol/mL): 0-6 h: -4.44 (6.72)
7-12 h: 11.94 (5.08)"
13-18 h: 5.06(4.03)
19-24 h: 1.06(4.64)
Note: Adding ambient PM2.6 data as a
covariate in the model yielded similar
regression coefficients for personal PMio
PM Increment: SE*1000
Effect Estimate (change in HRV per
unit increase in PM concentration):
SDNN: -0.71 msec (SE - 0.268)
Notes: Weekly ambulatory 24 h ECG
recordings (once per week for up to 12
weeks), using Holter monitors, were
made. Subjects' residences were within 5
miles of one of two PM monitoring sites.
Regressed HRV parameters against 18:
00-20: 00 mean particulate pollution.
July 2009
E-9
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ljungman et al. (2008,
180266)
Period of Study: Aug 2001 - Dec 2006
Location: Gothenburg & Stockholm,
Sweden
Outcome: Ventricular Arrhythmia
Age Groups: 28-85 yrs
Study Design: case-crossover
N: 88 patients wf implantable
cardioverter defibrillators
Statistical Analyses: conditional
logistic regression
Covariates: temperature, humidity,
pressure, ischemic heart disease, ejection
fraction, heart disease, diabetes, use of
beta-blockers, age, BMI, location at time
of arrhythmia, distance from air pollution
monitor
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: Stata, S-plus
Lags Considered: lags 2-24h
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: hourly
Gothenburg, Stockholm
Median:
2h: 18.95,14.62
24h: 19.92,15.23
Min:
2h: 0.00, 0.33
24h: 2.13,3.96
Max:
2h: 203.75,159.79
24h: 78.01,90.50
IQR:
2h: 14.16,11.59
24h: 11.49,9.59
Monitoring Stations: 2
Copollutant: PM2.6, NO2
Co-pollutant Correlation
2h NO?: 0.36
24h NO?: 0.29
PM Increment: Interquartile Range
Odds Ratio (Lower CI, Upper CI):
2h: 1.31 (1.00,1.72)
24h: 1.24 (0.87,1.76)
Notes: OR of ventricular arrhythmia for
an IQR increase of air pollutants in
different subgroups (figure 2)
Reference: Ljungman et al. (2009,
191983)
Period of Study: May 2003 - July 2004
Location: Athens, Greece
Helsinki, Finland
Ausburg, Germany
Barcelona, Spain
Rome, Italy
Stokholm, Sweeden
Outcome: lnterleukin-6 Response
Age Groups: 35-80 yrs
Study Design: panel
N: 955 male myocardial infarction
survivors
Statistical Analyses: Additive Mixed
Models
Covariates: age, sex, BMI, city,
HDL/total cholesterol, smoking, alcohol
intake, HbA1c, NT-proBNP, history of M
heart failure, or diabetes, phlegm
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 1d
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean: 31.6
25": 21.1
75": 38.4
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: CO, NO2, PNC, PM2.6
Co-pollutant Correlation
PM2.6: 0.81
PM Increment: Interquartile Range (17.4
j"g/m3)
Change of IL-6 (Lower CI, Upper CI), p-
value:
0.0(-1.3,1.3), 1.0
Reference: Mar et al. (2005, 087566)
Period of Study: 1999-2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Outcome: Change in arterial O2 satura-
tion, heart rate, and blood pressure (SBP
and DBP)
Age Groups: >75 years
Study Design: Panel study
N: 88 elderly subjects
Statistical Analysis: GEE
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24-hs
Mean (SD): Indoor: 12.6 (7.8)
Outdoor: 14.5 (7.0)
PM Increment: 10 |Jgfm3
Unit change in measure(95% CI):
Among all subjects: Each increase in
outdoor same day PM10 was associated
with: SBP: -0.10 mmHg (95% CI:-1.37,
1.18)
DBP: -0.03 mmHg (95% CI:-0.79, 0.73)
HR: -0.48 beats/min (95% CI:-1.03,
0.06)
Each increase in indoor same day
PM2.6 was associated with: SBP: 0.92
mmHg (95% CI:-0.95, 2.78)
DBP: 0.63 mmHg (95% CI:-0.29,1.56)
HR: 0.02 beats/min (95% CI: -0.54, 0.58)
Notes: Results by health status
presented in Fig 1. Used 2 sessions that
each were 10 consecutive days of
measurement. Used personal, indoor, and
outdoor measures of PM2.6
July 2009
E-10
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Reference: Metzgeret al. (2007,
092856)
Period of Study: January 1993-
December 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Design & Methods
Outcome: Days with any event recorded
by the ICD, days with ICD
shocksfdefibrillation and days with either
cardiac pacing or defibrillation
Study Design: Repeated measures
N: 884 subjects
Statistical Analysis: Logistic regression
with GEE to account for residual
autocorrelation within subjects
Concentrations'
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 28.0(12.2)
Median: 26.4
Copollutant: 0:i, NO2, CO, SO2.
Aug1998 Dec2002: Oxygenated
hydrocarbons
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
PM Increment: OR (95% CI):
Outcome - Any event recorded by ICD
OR - 1.00(95% CI: 0.97,1.03)
Reference: Min et al. (2008,191901)
Period of Study: Dec 2003-Jan 2004
Location: Taein Isalnd, South Korea
24h-avg: -13.15 (-23.36,-1.57)**
48-havg:-0.10 (-9.99,10.87)
72-h avg: -7.61 (-17.04,2.88)
HF
6-h avg: -1.07 (-10.43, 9.28)
9-h avg:-3.28 (-13.72, 8.43)
12-h avg: -4.06 (-14.77, 8.00)
24h-avg: -1.22 (-13.96,13.41)
48-havg:-3.55 (-14.01, 8.18)
72-h avg:-3.88 (-14.64, 8.23)
Notes: Percent Change in HRV for air
pollution children, adults, and the elderly
(figure 2)
Percent Change in HRV for PM10 exposure
in all ages (figure 3)
Outcome: Heart Rate Variability
Age Mean (SD): 44.3 (21.9)
Study Design: Panel
N: 1.349 participants
Statistical Analyses: Linear Regression
Covariates: age, sex, BMI, smoking
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS, R
Lags Considered: 0-72h
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 1 h
Mean (SD): 33.244(19.017)
Percentiles:
25th: 18.000
50th: 26.000
75th: 41.000
Range: 187.000. 16.000
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant: NO2, SO2
PM Increment: 1 SD (19 |Jg|m3)
Percent Change: [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
SDNN
6-h avg: -4.34 (-7.99, -0.55)**
9-h avg: -5.48 (-9.61,-1.17)**h"
12-h avg:-6.23 (-10.47,-1.79)***
24h-avg: -4.73 (-9.73, 0.56)-
48-h avg:-1.25 (-5.59, 3.29)
72-h avg:-0.85 (-5.35, 3.86)
LF
6-h avg: -10.32 (-18.05,-1.86)**
9-h avg:-13.79 (-22.26, -4.39)***
12-h avg:-14.48 (-23.18, -4.80)***
Reference: Peters et al. (2009,191992) Outcome: Plasma Fibrinogen
Period of Study: May 2003 - July 2004 Age Groups: 37-81
Study Design: panel
N: 854 adults
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Ausburg, Germany
Barcelona, Spain
Rome, Italy
Stokholm, Sweeden
Statistical Analyses: Additive Mixed
Models
Covariates: age, sex, BMI, city,
HDL/total cholesterol, smoking, HbA1c,
NT-proBNP, history of arrhythmia,
asthma, arthrosis, stroke, bronchitis,
season, apparent temperature, relative
humidity, weekday, hour of visit
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 0-5d avg
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean (SD): 30.3
Min: 0
Max: 194
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: PM2.6, PM102 E
Co-pollutant Correlation
NR
PM Increment: 13.5 /yglm3
Change (Lower CI, Upper CI):
Genotype 1 1
rs2070006:1.22 (0.47,1.96)
rs2070011:1.16 (0.41,1.90)
rs1800790: 0.27 (-0.36, 0.91)
rs2227399: 0.27 (-0.36, 0.91)
rs6056: 0.19 (-0.45, 0.83)
rs4220: 0.19 (-0.45, 0.83)
Haplotype in cluster 2: 0.09 (-0.53, 0.76)
rs1800791: 0.18 (0.21,1.40)
Genotype 1 2
rs2070006: 0.5 (-0.19, 2.15)
rs2070011:0.42 (-0.28,1.13)
rs1800790:1.28 (0.54,2.01)
rs2227399:1.28 (0.55, 2.02)
rs6056: 1.26 (0.49, 2.04)
rs4220: 1.27 (0.49, 2.04)
Haplotype in cluster 2: 1.17 (0.35,1.99)
rs1800791: 0.40 (-0.48,1.28)
Genotype 2 2
rs2070006: 0.11 (-1.94,2.15)
rs2070011:0.08 (-2.08, 2.24)
rs1800790: 2.15 (0.71, 3.60)
S2227399: 2.18(0.73, 3.63)
s6056: 2.24 (0.72, 3.77)
s4220: 2.25 (0.73, 3.78)
Haplotype in cluster 2: 2.16 (0.61, 3.71)
rs1800791:-0.13 (-1.84,1.58)
July 2009
E-11
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Rosenlund et al. (2007,
114679)
Period of Study: 1985-1996
Location: Stockholm County
Outcome: Myocardial Infarction
Age Groups: 15-79 yrs
Study Design: case-control
N: 24,387 first event of myocardial
infarction cases and 276,926 population
based controls
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
Regression
Covariates: age, sex, calendar year, SES
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: Stata
Lags Considered: 5yr
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 5yrs
Cases
Median: 2.4
5"'-95th: 0.3-6.2
Controls
Median: 2.2
5"'-95th: 0.3-6.0
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: NO2, CO
Co-pollutant Correlation
HNR
PM Increment: 5th to 95th percentile
(5/yg/m3)
Odds Ratio (Lower CI, Upper CI):
All Subjects
Controls: 1.0
All Cases: 1.04 (1.00,1.09)
Nonfatal Cases: 0.98 (0.963,1.03)
Fatal Cases: 1.16(1.09,1.24)
ln-hospital death: 1.05 (0.95,1.17)
Out-of-hospital death: 1.23 (1.14,1.33)
Subjects who did not move bit population
censuses
Controls: 1.0
All Cases: 1.11 (1.02,1.21)
Nonfatal Cases: 1.05 (0.96,1.15)
Fatal Cases: 1.56(1.28,1.91)
ln-hospital death: 1.58 (1.13, 2.19)
Out-of-hospital death: 1.56 (1.22,1.98)
Reference: Ruckerl et al. (2007,
156931)
Outcome: lnterleukin-6 (IL-6), fibrinogen,
C-reactive protein (CRP)
Pollutant: PMii
PM Increment: IQR
Period of Study: May 2003—Jul 2004 Age Groups: 35-80 yrs
Location: Athens, Augsburg, Barcelona,
Helsinki, Rome, and Stockholm
Study Design: Repeated measures I
longitudinal
N: 1003 Ml survivors
Statistical Analyses: Mixed-effect
models
Covariates: City-specific confounders
(age, sex, BMI)
long-term time trend and apparent
temperature
RH, time of day, day of week included if
adjustment improved model fit
Season: Long-term time trend
Dose-response Investigated? Used p-
splines to allow for nonparametric
exposure-response functions
Statistical Package: SAS v9.1
Averaging Time: Hourly and 24-h (lag 0- Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
4, mean of lags 0-4, mean of lags 0-1, % change in mean blood markers per
mean of lags2-3, means of lags 0-3) increase in IQR increase of air pollutant.
IL-6: Lag (IQR): % change in GM (95%CI)
Mean (SD): Presented by city only
Percentiles: NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Lag 0(17.4)
Lag 1 (17.4)
Lag 2 (17.4)
¦0.34 (-1.66, 0.99)
0.69(-1.95, 0.58)
1.59 (-3.99, 0.88)
5-d avg (13.5):-0.87 (-2.28, 0.55)
Monitoring Stations: Central monitoring .
? ., 0 Fibrinogen:
citoc in oann nti/ °
sites in each city
Copollutant: SO2
03
NO
NO?
Lag (IQR): % change in AM
(95%CI)
Lag 0(17.4): 0.06 (-0.43, 0.55)
Lag 1 (17.4): 0.14 (-0.35, 0.63)
Lag 2 (17.4): 0.24 (-0.24,0.72)
5-d avg (13.5): 0.60(0.10,1.09)
CRP: Lag (IQR): % change in GM (95%CI)
Lag 0(17.4)
Lag 1 (17.4)
Lag 2 (17.4)
¦0.71 (-2.75,1.37)
¦0.63 (-2.61,1.39)
1.42(4.23,1.47)
5-d avg (13.5):-1.35 (-3.45, 0.79)
July 2009
E-12
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ruckerl et al. (2006,
088754)
Period of Study: Oct 2000—Apr 2001
Location: Erfurt, Germany
Outcome: C-reactive protein (CRP)
serum amyloid A (SAA)
E-selectin
vWF
intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-
1)
fibrinogen
Factor VII
prothrombin fragment 1 +2
Ddimer
Age Groups: 50+ yrs
Study Design: Panel (12 repeated
measures at 2-wk intervals)
N: 57 male subjects with coronary
disease
Statistical Analyses: Fixed effects
linear and logistic regression models
Covariates: Models adjusted for differ-
ent factors based on health endpoint
CRP: RH, temperature, trend, ID
ICAM-1: temperature, trend, ID
vWF: air pressure, RH, temperature,
trend, ID
FVII: air pressure, RH, temperature, trend,
ID, weekday
Season: Time trend as covariate
Dose-response Investigated? Sensi-
tivity analyses examined nonlinear
exposure-response functions
Statistical Package: SAS v8.2 and S-
Plus v6.0
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h
Mean (SD): 20.0(13.0)
Percentiles: 25th: 10.8
50th: 15.6
75th: 26.0
Range (Min, Max): 5.4, 74.5
Monitoring Stations: 1 site
Copollutant: UFPs (ultrafine particles)
AP (accumulation mode particles)
PM2.6
PM10
0C (organic carbon)
EC (elemental carbon)
NO?
CO
PM Increment: IQR (15.2
5-davg: 12.8)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Effects of air pollution on blood markers
presented as OR (95%CI) for an increase
in the blood marker above the 90th
percentile per increase in IQR air
pollutant.
CRP: Time before draw: 0 to 23 h: 1.2
(0.8,1.9)
24 to 47 h: 2.0(1.1,3.6)
48 to 71 h: 2.2(1.2, 3.8)
5-d mean: 2.0 (1.2, 3.7)
ICAM-1: Time before draw: 0 to 23 h:
1.3(0.9,1.8)
24 to 47 h: 3.1 (2.0, 4.8)
48 to 71 h: 3.4(2.2, 5.2)
5-d mean: 3.4 (2.2, 5.3)
Effects of air pollution on blood markers
presented as % change from the
meanfGM in the blood marker per
increase in IQR air pollutant.
vWF: Time before draw: 0 to 23 h: 4.0
(-0.6, 8.5)
24 to 47 h: 6.0(0.6,11.5)
48 to 71 h: 1.1 (-4.9,7.0)
5-d mean: 6.1 ( 0.6,12.8)
FVII: Time before draw: 0 to 23 h: -6.6
(-10.4 to -2.5)
24 to 47 h:-8.4 (-12.3 to-4.3)
48 to 71 h: -5.9 (-9.6,-2.0)
5-d mean: -8.0 (-12.4, -3.4)
Note: summary of results presented in
figures. SAA results indicate increases in
association with PM (not as strong and
consistent as with CRP)
no association observed between E-
selectin and PM
an increase in prothrombin fragment 1 +2
was consistently observed, particularly
with lag 4
fibrinogen results revealed few significant
associations, potentially due to chance
D dimer results revealed null associations
in linear and logistic analyses
July 2009
E-13
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ruckerl et al. (2007,
091379)
Period of Study: Oct 2000—Apr 2001
Location: Erfurt, Germany
Outcome: Soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L),
platelets, leukocytes, erythrocytes,
hemoglobin
Age Groups: 50+ yrs
Study Design: Panel (12 re
measures at 2-wk intervals)
N: 57 male subjects with coronary
disease
Statistical Analyses: Fixed effects
linear regression models
Covariates: Long-term time trend, week-
day of the visit, temperature, RH, baro-
metric pressure
Season: Time trend as covariate
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS v8.2 and S-
Plus v6.0
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h
Mean (SD): 20.0(13.0)
Percentiles: 25: 10.8
50: 15.6
75: 26.0
Range (Min, Max): 5.4, 74.5
Monitoring Stations: 1 site
Copollutant: UFPs (ultrafine particles),
AP (accumulation mode particles), PM2.6,
PM10, NO
PM Increment: IQR (15.2
5-d avg: 12.8)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Effects of air pollution on blood markers
presented as % change from the
meanfGM in the blood marker per
increase in IQR air pollutant.
sCD40L, % change GM (pg/mL): lagO:
1.6(-3.5, 7.0)
lag 1: 1.1 (-5.4,7.9)
Iag2: -3.5 (-8.9, 2.2)
Iag3: -1.4 (-6.0, 3.4)
5-d mean: -1.2 (-7.8, 5.8)
Platelets, % change mean (103/|Jl):
lagO: -0.4 (-1.9,1.0)
Iag1: 0.4 (-1.4, 2.3)
Iag2: 0.5 (-1.4, 2.3)
Iag3: -0.1 (-1.6,1.4)
5-d mean: 0.0 (2.1, 0.0)
Leukocytes, % change in mean
(103/|Jl): lagO: -1.1 (-2.8,0.7)
Iag1: -0.5 (-2.6,1.5)
Iag2: 0.1 (-2.1,2.4)
Iag3: -0.7 (-2.6,1.2)
5-d mean: -1.1 (-3.6,1.4)
Erythrocytes, % change mean (10E/|Jl):
lagO: 0.0 (-0.4, 0.5)
Iag1: -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Iag2: -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Iag3: -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
5-d mean: -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Hemoglobin, % change mean (g/dl):
lagO: -0.1 (-0.7,0.6)
Iag1: -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Iag2: -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Iag3: -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
5-d mean: -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Reference: Steinvil et al. (2008,
188893)
Period of Study: 2003-2006
Location: Tel-Aviv, Israel
Outcome: Inflammation
Age Groups:
Mean (SD): 46 (12) years
Study Design: panel
N:3659
Statistical Analyses: Linear Regression
Covariates: age, waist circumference,
BMI, HDL, 0LDL, triglycerides, diastolic 81
systolic BP, alcohol consumption, sports
intensity, medications, smoking status,
family history of CHD, temperature,
humidity, precipitation, season, 81 year
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SPSS
Lags Considered: 0-7d
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean (SD): 64 (100.8)
25": 33.1
50": 43.0
75": 60.7
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: SO2, NO2, O3, CO
Co-pollutant Correlation
SO2: 0.043
NO2: 0.082
0s:-0.113
CO: 0.075
PM Increment: Interquartile Range (27.6
j"g/m3)
hs-CRP Relative % Change (Lower CI,
Upper CI):
Men:
Lag 0: -1 (-2,1)
Lag 1:0 (-1,1); Lag 2:-1 (-2,1)
Lag 3: -1 (-2, 0)
Lag 4:0 (-1,1)
Lag 5:0(-1,2)
Lag 6: 1 (0, 2)
Lag 7:1 (0,1)
0-7 avg: -2 (-5,1)
Women:
Lag 0: 0 (-2, 2)
Lag 1:0 (-1,2)
Lag 2: 1 (0, 2)
Lag 3:0 (-1,1)
Lag 4:0 (-1,2)
Lag 5:0(-1,2)
Lag 6: -1 (-3,1)
Lag 7:0 (-2,1)
0-7 avg: 1 (-2, 4)
Fibrinogen Absolute % Change (Lower
CI, Upper CI):
Men:
LagO: 0.7(0.0,1.5); Lag1: 0.4( 0.2, 0.9);
Lag2:-0.1( 0.9, 0.6)
Lag3: -0.1( 0.7, 0.6); Lag4: 0.0( 0.7, 0.7);
Lag5: 0.1 (-0.7,1.0)
Lag6: 0.61-0.1,1.3); Lag7: 0.4(0.0,0.8);
July 2009 E-14 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
0-7 avg: -0.4(-1.9,1.0)
Women:
LagO: 0.3( 0.6,1.2); Lag1: -0.1( 0.8,
0.7);
Lag2: -0.3( 0.9, 0.3)
Lag3: -0.1( 0.7, 0.5); Lag4: 0.2( 0.4,
0.9):
Lag5: 0.2( 0.7,1.2)
Lag6:-0.3(-1.4, 0.8); Lag7: 0.7( 0.1,
1.5):
0-7 avg: 0.0(-1.5,1.5)
WBC Absolute Change (Lower CI,
Upper CI):
Men:
LagO: 2 (-22, 27)
Lag1: 3 (-14,19)
Lag2: 1 (-22, 24)
Lag3: -7 (-28,14)
Lag4: -22 (-44,-1)
Lag5: -20 (-46, 7)
Lag6: -5 (-27,16)
Lag7: -4(-16, 9)
0-7avg: -11 (-58, 36)
Women:
Lag 0: 20 (-6, 46)
Reference: Su et al. (2006,157022)
Period of Study: February-April 2002
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Outcome: Total cholesterol, HDL,
tryglycerides, LDL, hs-CRP, IL-6, TNF-a,
tPA, PAI-1, and fibrinogen
Age Groups: 40-75 years
Study Design: Panel study
N: 49 subjects (31 males and 18 females)
with coronary heart disease or multiple
risk factors for CHD
Statistical Analysis: Linear mixed
effects regression
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 1 h
(High pollution day
to 18: 00 >100)
Copollutant: 0:i
¦ PMio from 08: 00
PM Increment: High vs. Low pollution
days
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
CHD patients (n = 23): Pvalue for
paired t-test comparing health endpoint
means on high and low pollution days
hs-CRP: p - 0.568
IL-6: p - 0.856
TNF-a: p - 0.246
PAI-1: p - 0.008
tPA: p - 0.322
Fibrinogen: p - 0.189
P value for health endpoint in mixed-
effects models
PAI-1: p - 0.010
tPA: p - 0.329
Fibrinogen: p - 0.747
Patients with multiple CHD risk
factors (n = 26): P value for paired t-
test comparing health endpoint means on
high and low pollution days
hs-CRP: p - 0.475
IL-6: p - 0.561
TNF-a: p - 0.572
PAI-1: p - 0.098
tPA: p - 0.260
Fibrinogen: p - 0.087
P value for health endpoint in mixed-
effects models
PAI-1: p - 0.891
tPA: p - 0.789
Fibrinogen: p - 0.923
Notes: Subjects had paired fasting blood
samples taken during high and low air
pollution days.
July 2009
E-15
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Vedal et al„ (2004, 055630)
Period of Study: 1997-2000
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Outcome: Implantable cardioverter
defibrillator (ICD) discharge
Age Groups: All
Study Design: Time series
(Retrospective, longitudinal panel study)
N: 50 ICD patients with 1 + discharges
(40,328 person-days and 257 arrhythmia
event days)
Statistical Analyses: Multiple logistic
regression with GEE
Covariates: Temperature, relative
humidity, barometric pressure, rainfall,
wind direction and speed
Season: Summer (May-Sep) and winter
(Oct-Apr)
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: -3 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (min-max): 12.9 (3.8-49.3)
SD - 5.6
Monitoring Stations: 8
Copollutant (correlation): O3: r - 0.11
SO2: r - 0.70
NO?: r - 0.49
CO: r - 0.43
Other variables: Temp: r - 0.43
Humidity: r - -0.35
Baro Pressure: r - 0.26
Rain: r - -0.63
Wind: r - -0.53
PM Increment: 5.6/yglm3 (SD)
Percent Change [CI]: Values NR
Notes: The author states that significant
negative associations were found for ICD
discharge with same-day lag, and also for
3-day lag with more arrhythmia-prone
patients. All other non-significant percent
change estimates are shown in Fig 3 and
4.
Reference: Vedal et al. (2004, 055630) Outcome: ICD discharges (arrhythmias)
Period of Study: 1997-2000
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia,
Canada
N: 150 patients w/ICD, 4 yrs
Statistical Analysis: Logistic
regression, GEE
Covariates: Temporal trends,
temperature, relative humidity, wind
d, rain
Pollutant: PM10
Mean: 12.9 (SD - 5.6)
Copollutant): O3, SO2, NO2, CO
Increment: 1 SD
Effect Estimates, e.g., % change in the
rate of arrhythmia, were presented in
Figure 3. No association with PM10 was
observed while SO2 was associated with
an increase in the rate of arrhythmia
among 16 patients with at least 2
discharges per year.
Season: Summer, Winter
Dose-response Investigated? No
Lags Considered: 0.1.2.3d
July 2009
E-16
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Whitsel et al. (2009,
191980)
Period of Study: 1993-2004
Location: US
Outcome: Heart Rate Variability
Age Groups: 50-79 yrs
Study Design: panel
N: 4,295 women
Statistical Analyses: Random Effects
Model
Covariates: temperature, humidity
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SUDAAN
Lags Considered: 0
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24h
Amsterdam
Mean: 20.0
Min: 3.8
25": 10.4
50": 16.9
75": 23.9
Max: 82.2
Erfurt
Mean: 23.1
Min: 4.5
25": 10.5
50": 16.3
75": 27.4
Max: 118.1
Helsinki
Mean: 12.7
Min: 3.1
25": 8.1
50": 10.6
75": 16.0
Max: 39.8
Monitoring Stations: 3
Copollutant: NR
Co-pollutant Correlation
n/a
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Beta (Lower CI, Upper CI):
Supine Position, Amsterdam
Lag 0
|1
I 2
¦0.06 (-0.95, 0.84)
0.18(-0.74,1.10)
0.93 (0.01,1.85)
5d avg: 0.49 (-0.74,1.72)
Supine Position, Erfurt
Lag 0
|1
I 2
0.36 (-0.83, 0.11)
¦0.40 (-0.91,0.11)
¦0.68 (-1.20,-0.17)
5d avg:-0.68 (-1.44, 0.09)
Supine Position, Helsinki
Lag 0:-0.44 (-2.27,1.40)
Lag 1: -0.17 (-1.69,1.3.5)
Lag 2: -1.14 (-2.51, 0.23)
5d avg: -0.59 (-3.08,1.90)
Supine Position, Pooled
Lag 0
|1
I 2
¦0.30 (-0.71,0.11)
¦0.25 (-0.68, 0.18)
0.26 (-1.22, 0.70)*
5d avg: -0.36 (-0.99, 0.27)
Standing Position, Amsterdam
Lag 0
|1
I 2
¦0.44 (-1.6, 0.72)
¦0.61 (-1.8, 0.59)
0.32(-0.88,1.51)
5d avg: -0.55 (-2.15,1.04)
Standing Position, Erfurt
Lag 0
|1
I 2
i: -0.59 (-1.24,0.06)
:-0.70 (-1.42, 0.03)
!: -0.65 (-1.37, 0.07)
5d avg: -0.68 (-1.74, 0.39)
Standing Position, Helsinki
Lag 0:1.17 (-1.46, 3.80)
Lag 1:0.01 (-2.17, 2.19)
Lag 2: -0.63 (-2.60,1.34)
5d avg: -1.96 (-5.51,1.60)
Standing Position, Pooled
Lag 0
|1
I 2
0.48 (-1.03, 0.07)
¦0.62 (-1.21,-0.03)
¦0.41 (-1.00, 0.17)
5d avg: -0.72 (-1.57, 0.14)
*p<0.1
Reference: Yeatts et al. (2007, 091266)
Outcome: Heart Rate Variability
Pollutant: PMio
PM Increment: 1 /yglm3
Period of Study: 12 wk period bit Sept
Age Groups: 21-50 yrs
Averaging Time: 24h
Beta, SE, p-value (Lower CI, Upper CI):
2003 -July 2004
NR
Study Design: panel
Mean (SD): 17.5 (7.8)
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
N: 12 asthmatics
Min: 1.4
Statistical Analyses: Linear Mixed
Max: 45.6
Model
Monitoring Stations: 1
Covariates: temperature, humidity,
Copollutant: PM2.6, PM102 E
pressure
Dose-response Investigated? No
Co-pollutant Correlation
PM2.6 - 0.90*
Statistical Package: SAS
PM10-2.6 - 0.73*
Lags Considered: 1 day
*p < 0.01
'All units expressed in/yglm3 unless otherwise specified.
July 2009
E-17
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table E-2. Short-term exposure - cardiovascular morbidity studies: PM102.5.
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Chuang et al. (2007,
091063)
Period of Study: Nov 2002 - Mar 2003
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Outcome: Heart Rate Variability
Age Groups: 52-76 yrs
Study Design: panel
N: 10 CHD & 16 Hypertensive Patients
Statistical Analyses: Linear Mixed
Effects Model
Covariates: age, sex, BMI, time of day,
temperature, humidity, pressure, HRV
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: S-PLUS
Lags Considered: 1-4h ma
Pollutant: PM10 2 E
Averaging Time: 1h
among CHD, among hypertensive
Mean (SD): 16.4 (10.7), 14.0(11.1)
IQR: 14.8,11.9
Min: 0.7, 0.3
Max: 59.6, 66.5
Monitoring Stations: 1 personal
monitor each
Copollutant: PMi 02B, PMoti.o
Co-pollutant Correlation
NR
PM Increment: Interquartile range
Percent Change (Lower CI, Upper CI):
Cardiac Patients- SDNN
1h moving
2h moving
3h moving
4h moving
:-1.73 (-3.53, 0.08)
:-1.97 (-4.43, 0.49)
:-1.70 (-4.39, 0.89)
:-1.75 (-5.42,1.92)
Cardiac Patients- r-MSSD
1h moving
2h moving
3h moving
4h moving
: -4.39 (-9.54, 0.03)
:-4.36 (-8.99, 0.27)
:-4.20 (-9.02, 0.61)
: -2.70 (-9.24, 3.84)
Cardiac Patients- LF
1h moving
2h moving
3h moving
4h moving
:-1.85 (-4.33, 0.62)
:-3.87 (-8.22, 0.47
:-2.98 (-6.65, 0.69)
:-3.11 (-8.22,1.99)
Cardiac Patients- HF
1h moving
2h moving
3h moving
4h moving
¦4.46 (-9.23, 0.32)
¦4.41 (-9.55, 0.72)
¦3.80 (-9.12,1.53)
¦3.39 (-10.62, 3.84)
Cardiac Patients- LF: HF ratio
1h moving: 8.45 (-3.48, 20.38)
2h moving: 1.66 (-15.22,18.55)
3h moving: 11.69 (-7.27, 30.64)
4h moving: 8.18 (-17.22, 33.57)
Hypertensive Patients- SDNN
1h moving: -2.64 (-3.93, 0.55
2h moving: -3.51 (-7.87, 0.85)
3h moving: -2.74 (-6.22, 0.74)
4h moving: -2.49 (-6.13,1.15)
Hypertensive Patients- r-MSSD
1h moving: -2.53 (-5.10, 0.04)
2h moving: -5.42 (-10.92, 0.09)
3h moving:-3.15 (-6.32, 0.03)
4h moving: -4.23 (-8.88, 0.42)
Hypertensive Patients- LF
1h moving: -4.38 (-8.78, 0.03)
2h moving: -5.23 (-10.95, 0.05)
3h moving: -3.34 (-1.72, 0.04)
4h moving: -2.96 (-6.63, 0.71)
Hypertensive Patients- HF
1h moving: -4.92 (-9.94, 0.10)
2h moving: -6.07 (-12.28, 0.13)
3h moving: -1.94 (-5.44,1.55)
4h moving: -2.78 (-6.78,1.21)
Hypertensive Patients- LF: HF ratio
1 h moving: 5.94 (-3.27,15.15)
2h moving: 10.70 (-2.19, 23.59)
3h moving: -1.51 (-17.02,14.00)
4h moving: 3.41 (-16.91,23.74)
*p< 0.05
July 2009
E-18
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Reference: Ebelt et al. (2005, 056907)
Period of Study: Summer of 1998
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Design & Methods
Outcome: CVD
Age Groups: range from 54-86 yrs
mean age - 74 years
Study Design: extended analysis of a
repeated-measures panel study
N: 16 persons with COPD
Statistical Analyses:
Earlier analysis expanded by developing
mixed-effect regression models and by
evaluating additional exposure indicators
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS V8
Concentrations'
Pollutant: PM10 2 E
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD):
Ambient PMio-2.5: 5.6 (3.0)
Exposure to ambient PMio-2.5: 2.4 (1.7)
Range (Min, Max): Ambient PM102E: (¦
1.2-11.9)
Exposure to ambient PMkh.b: (-0.4-7.2)
Monitoring Stations: 5
Copollutant (correlation):
Ambient concentrations and exposure to
ambient PM were highly correlated for
each respective metric: r a 0.71
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Note: Total personal fine particle
exposure (T) were dominated by
exposures to non ambient particles which
were not correlated with ambient fine
particle exposure (A) or ambient
concentrations (C). Results for each of
these metrics are listed.
PM Increment:
Increment: C10-26: IQR - 4.5//gfm3
SBP (mm Hg): -2.12 (-5.07-0.82)
DBP (mm Hg):-0.92 (-3.37-0.36)
Ln-SVE (bph): 0.06 (-0.24-0.36)
HR (bpm): 1.09 (-0.69-2.86)
SDNN(ms): 2.64 (-2.85-8.13)
R-MSSD (ms): -0.33 (-4.49-3.82)
Increment: A10"2 6: IQR -2.4//gfm3
SBP (mm Hg):-2.55 (-6.15-1.05)
DBP (mm Hg):-0.75 (-3.50-2.01)
Ln-SVE (bph): 0.26 (-0.07-0.58)
HR (bpm): 1.04 (-0.95-3.03)
SDNN (ms): 0.68 (-3.07-4.42)
R-MSSD (ms): 1.10 (-3.08-5.28)
Reference: Lipsett et al. (2006, 088753) Outcome: HRV parameters, specifically
SDNN, SDANN, r-MSSD, LF, HF, total
Period of Study: February-May 2000
Location: Coachella Valley, CA
power, triangular index (TRII).
Study Design: Panel study
N: 19 non-smoking adults with coronary
artery disease
Statistical Analysis: Mixed linear
regression models with random effects
parameters
Pollutant: PMio-2.5
Averaging Time: 2 h
Monitoring Stations: 2
Copollutant: 03
PM Increment: SE*1000
Effect Estimate (change in HRV per
unit increase in PM concentration):
SDNN:-0.72 msec (SE - 0.296)
Notes: PM10-2.E calculated by subtracting
PM2.6 concentration from PM10
concentration. Weekly ambulatory 24 h
ECG recordings (once per week for up to
12 weeks), using Holter monitors, were
made. Subjects' residences were within 5
miles of one of two PM monitoring sites.
Regressed HRV parameters against 18:
00-20: 00 mean particulate pollution
Reference: Metzgeret al. (2007,
092856)
Period of Study: August 1998-
December 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Outcome: Days with any event recorded
by the ICD, days with ICD
shocksfdefibrillation and days with either
cardiac pacing or defibrillation
Study Design: Repeated measures
N: 884 subjects between 1993 and 2002
Statistical Analysis: Logistic regression
with GEE to account for residual
autocorrelation within subjects
Pollutant: PM10 2.5 (n/cm3)
Averaging Time: 24-hs
Mean (SD): 9.6 (5.4)
Median: 8.7
Copollutant: O3, NO2, CO, SO2,
oxygenated hydrocarbons
PM Increment: OR (95% CI): OR - 1.03
(95% CI: 1.00,1.07)
Reference: Pekkanen et al. (2002,
035050)
Period of Study: Winter 1998 to 1999
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Outcome: ST Segment Depression
(> 0.1 mV)
Study Design: Panel of ULTRA Study
participants
N: 45 subjects, 342 biweekly submaximal
exercise tests, 72 exercise induced ST
Segment Depressions
Statistical Analysis: Logistic regression
I GAM
Pollutant: PM10 2.5 (n/cm3)
Averaging Time: 24 h
Median: 4.8
IQR: 5.5
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant: NO2, CO, PM2.6, PM1, ACP,
ultrafine
PM Increment: IQR
Effect Estimate(s): PM10 2.5: OR - 1.99
(0.70,5.67), lag 2
Notes: The effect was strongest for ACP
and PM2.E, which in two pollutant models
appeared independent. Increases in NO2
and CO were also associated with
increased risk of ST segment depression,
but not with coarse particles.
Reference: Timonen et al. (2006,
088747)
Period of Study: 1998-1999
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Erfurt, Germany
Helsinki, Finland
Outcome: HRV measurements: [LF, HF,
LFHFR, NN interval, SDNN, r-MSSD]
Study Design: Panel study
N: 131 elderly subjects with stable
coronary heart disease
Statistical Analysis: Linear mixed
models
Pollutant: PMio-2.5
Means: Amsterdam: 15.3
Erfurt: 3.7
Helsinki: 6.7
Copollutant: NO2, CO
PM Increment: 10/yglm3
Effect Estimate: SDNN
0.69ms (95% CI:-1.24, 2.63)
HF: 2.9% (95% CI:-7.3,13.1)
LFHFR:-3.3 (95% CI:-12.7, 6.1)
Notes: Followed for 6 months with
biweekly clinic visits
2 day lag. ULTRA Study
July 2009
E-19
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Yeatts et al. (2007, 091266) Outcome: Heart Rate Variability
Period of Study: 12 wk period bit Sept Age Groups: 21 -50 yrs
2003 -July 2004
Study Design: panel
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
N: 12 asthmatics
Statistical Analyses: Linear Mixed
Model
Covariates: temperature, humidity,
pressure
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 1 day
Pollutant: PM10 2 E
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean (SD): 5.3 (2.8)
Min: 0
Max: 14.6
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant: PM2.6, PMio
Co-pollutant Correlation
PM2.6 - 0.46*
PM10 - NR
*p<0.01
PM Increment: 1 //gf'nr1. Beta, SE
(Lower CI, Upper CI), p-value
HRV
Max Heart Rate: -1.95, 0.88 (-3.67, ¦
0.231,0.03
ASDNN5:-0.77, 0.37 (-1.580,-0.04),
0.05
SDANN5: -3.76,1.53 (-6.76,-0.76), 0.02
SDNN24HR(mesc): -3.36,1.38 (-6.06, ¦
0.651,0.02
rMSSD: -0.75, 0.53 (-1.79, 0.28), 0.16
pNN50_24hour: -0.50, 0.27 (-1.03,
0.031,0.07
pNN50_7min: -1.88, 0.55 (-2.95, -0.81),
0.07
Low-frequency power: -0.19, 0.42 (-1.01,
0.631,0.65
Percent low frequency: 0.57,1.08 (-1.55,
2.691,0.60
High-frequency power: -0.46, 0.17 (¦
0.79,-0.14), 0.01
Percent high frequency: -2.14, 0.94 (¦
3.98,-0.30), 0.03
Blood Lipids
Triglycerides: 4.78, 2.02 (0.81, 8.74),
0.02
VLDL: 1.15, 0.44(0.29,2.02), 0.01
Total cholesterol: 0.78, 0.54 (-0.28,
1.841,0.15
Hematologic Factors
Circulating eosinophils: 0.16, 0.06 (0.04,
0.281,0.01
Platelets:-1.71,1.11 (-3.89,0.47), 0.13
Circulating Proteins
Plasminogen: -0.01, 0.01 (-0.02, 0.00),
0.08
Fibrenogen: -0.04, 0.02 (-0.08, 0.00),
0.07
Von Willibrand factor: -1.23, 0.66 (-2.53,
0.06),0.07
Factor VII: -0.90, 0.85 (-2.58, 0.77), 0.29
'All units expressed in/yglm3 unless otherwise specified.
Table E-3. Short-term exposure - cardiovascular morbidity studies: PM2.5 (including PM
components/sources).
Concentrations'
Reference
Design & Methods
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Adar et al. (2007, 001458)
Period of Study: Mar-Jun 2002
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Outcome: Heart rate variability: heart
rate, standard deviation of all normal-to-
normal intervals (SDNN), square root of
the mean squared difference between
adjacent normal-to-normal intervals
(rMSSD), percentage of adjacent normal-
to-normal intervals that differed by more
than 50 ms (pNN50), high frequency
power (HF
in the range of 0.15-0.4Hz), low frequency
power (LF, in the range of 0.04-0.15Hz),
and the ratio of LF/HF
Age Groups: a 60 yrs
Study Design: Panel (4 planned re|
measures surrounding bus trips with a
total of 158 person-trips
35 participating in all 4 trips)
Pollutant: PM2.6 (|Jg|m3)
Averaging Time: Measurements
collected over 48 h period surrounding the
bus trip (during which health endpoints
were measured) used to calculate 5-, 30-,
60-minute, 4-h, 24-h moving averages
Median (IQR): All: 7.7 (6.8)
Facility: 6.8 (5.1)
Bus: 17.2(10.3)
Activity: 8.2 (16.1)
Lunch: 11.2(5.9)
Monitoring Stations: 2 portable carts
Copollutant: PM2.6
BC
Fine particle counts
coarse particle counts
Correlation notes: 24-h mean PM2.6, BC,
_and_^me_£article_count_concentratmn^^^
PM Increment: IQR
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]: %
change (95%CI) in HRV per IQR in the 24-
h moving avg of the microenvironmental
pollutant (IQr - 4.5 |Jg|m3)
Single-pollutant models: SDNN: -5.5
(-6.3, -4.8)
rMSSD: -9.1 (-9.8,-8.4)
pNN50 + 1: -12.2 (-13.3,-11.1). LF: -
10.8 (-12.3,-9.3)
HF: -15.1 (-16.7,-13.7)
LF/HF: 5.1 (3.9, 6.4)
H: 1.0 (0.9, 1.2)
Two-pollutant models (with particle
number count coarse): SDNN: -5.7 (-6.5,
¦4.9)
rMSSD: -9.4(-10.1,-8.6)
pNN50 + 1: -13.1 (-14.3, -11.9). LF: ¦
July 2009
E-20
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
N: 44 participants
Statistical Analyses: Generalized
additive models
Covariates: Subject, weekday, time,
apparent temperature, trip type, activity,
medications, and autoregressive terms
Season: Limited data collection period
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS v8.02, R
V2.0.1
ranged from 0.80 to 0.98
r - 0.76 to 0.97 when limited to time
spent on the bus
r - 0.55 to 0.86 when comparing bus
concentrations to 24-h moving averages
r - -0.003 to 0.51 when comparing 5-min
averages and 24-h moving averages
Poor correlations found between coarse
particle count concentrations and all fine
particulate measures during all times
periods
10.7(-12.4,-9.1)
HF: -14.9(-16.5, -13.3); LF/HF: 4.9 (3.6,
6.2)' H: 0.9 (0.7,1.1)
Independent short- and medium-term
associations with HRV across all time
periods
% change per IQR (95%CI)
IQR 5-min means - 6.8 |Jg|m3 and 23: 55-
h means - 4.2 |Jg|m3
SDNN: 5-min mean: -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
23: 55-h mean: -4.6 (-5.3, -4.0)
rMSSD: 5-min mean: -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
23: 55-h mean: -7.5 (-8.1 to -6.8)
pNN50 + 1
5-min mean: -1.1 (-1.7 to -0.5)
23: 55-h mean: -9.9 (-10.9 to -8.9). LF
5-min mean: 0.4 (-0.5,1.2)
23: 55-h mean: -10.0 (-11.4 to -8.6)
HF
5-min mean: -1.5 (-2.3 to -0.6)
23: 55-h mean: -12.9 (-14.2 to-11.5)
LF/HF
5-min mean: 1.9 (1.3, 2.4)
23: 55-h mean: 3.2(2.1,4.3)
H: 5-min mean: 0.1 (0.1, 0.2)
23: 55-h mean: 0.8 (0.7, 0.9)
Independent associations of short-term
averages (5-min means) of PM with HRV
by bus and nonbus periods
IQR for bus - 10 |jg/m3) and
nonbus - 5.6 |jg/m3)
% change (95%CI)
p-value of interaction
SDNN
Bus: -5.0 (-6.3 to -3.7)
Nonbus: -0.5 (-0.9 to -0.2)
p-value for interaction: < 0.0001. rMSSD
Bus: -4.8 (-6.2 to -3.5)
Nonbus: -0.7 (-1.1 to -0.4. p-value for
interaction: < 0.0001
pNN50 + 1
Bus: -6.3 (-8.4 to -4.2)
Nonbus: -0.8 (-1.4 to -0.3)
p-value for interaction: <0.0001
LF: Bus: -7.0 (-9.8 to -4.1) Nonbus: 0.6
(-0.1,1.4)
p-value for interaction: < 0.0001. HF:
Bus: -10.7 (-13.5 to -7.9)' Nonbus: -0.7
(-1.5, 0.04) p-value for interaction:
< 0.0001. LF/HF: Bus: 3.9(1.7,6.0)
July 2009
E-21
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Adar et al. (2007, 001458)
Period of Study: March-Jun 2002
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Outcome: Heart rate variability: heart
rate, standard deviation of all normal-to-
normal intervals (SDNN), square root of
the mean squared difference between
adjacent normal-to-normal intervals
(rMSSD), percentage of adjacent normal-
to-normal intervals that differed by more
than 50 ms (pNN50), high frequency
power (HF
in the range of 0.15-0.4Hz), low frequency
power (LF, in the range of 0.04-0.15Hz),
and the ratio of LF/HF
Age Groups: a 60 yrs
Study Design: Panel (4 planned repeated
measures with a total of 158 person-trips
35 participating in all 4 trips)
N: 44 participants
Statistical Analyses: Generalized
additive models
Covariates: Subject, weekday, time,
apparent temperature, trip type, activity,
medications, and autoregressive terms
Season: Limited data collection period
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS v8.02, R
V2.0.1
Pollutant: BC (ngfm3)
Averaging Time: Measurements
collected over 48 h period surrounding the
bus trip (during which health endpoints
were measured) used to calculate 5-, 30-,
60-minute, 4-h, 24-h moving averages
Median (IQR): All: 330 (337)
Facility: 285 (270)
Bus: 2911 (2464)
Activity: 482 (1168)
Lunch: 434 (276)
Monitoring Stations: 2 portable carts
Copollutant: PM2.6
BC
Fine particle counts
Coarse particle counts
Correlation notes: 24-h mean PM2.6, BC,
and fine particle count concentrations
ranged from 0.80 to 0.98
r - 0.76 to 0.97 when limited to time
spent on the bus
r - 0.55 to 0.86 when comparing bus
concentrations to 24-h moving averages
r - -0.003 to 0.51 when comparing 5-min
averages and 24-h moving averages
Poor correlations found between coarse
particle count concentrations and all fine
particulate measures during all times
periods
Nonbus: 1.4 (0.8,1.9)
p-value for interaction: 0.39. H: Bus: 0.7
(0.5,1.0)
Nonbus:-0.01 (-0.08,0.1)
p-value for interaction: <0.0001
Note: Exposure to health associations by
all lag periods presented in Figure 2
(magnitude of associations increased with
averaging period, with the largest
associations consistently found for 24-h
moving averages)
PM Increment: IQR
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]: %
change (95%CI) in HRV per IQR in the 24-
h moving avg of the microenvironmental
pollutant (IQr - 459 ng/m3)
Single-pollutant models
SDNN:-5.3 (-6.5 to-4.1)
rMSSD:-10.7 (-11.9 to-9.5)
pNN50 + 1:-13.2 (-15.0 to-11.4)
LF:-11.3 (-13.7 to-8.8)
HF:-18.8 (-21.1 to-16.5)
LF/HF: 9.3(7.2,11.4)
H: 1.0 (0.8, 1.3)
Independent short- and medium-term
associations with HRV across all time
periods
% change per IQR (95%CI)
IQR 5-min means - 337 ng/m3 and 23:
55-h means - 490 ng/m3)
SDNN: 5-min mean: -0.3 (-0.5 to -0.1)
23: 55-h mean: -4.7 (-5.9 to -3.5)
rMSSD: 5-min mean: -0.3 (-0.5 to -0.1)
23: 55-h mean: -9.3 (-10.5 to -8.1)
pNN50 + 1: 5-min mean: -0.3 (-0.6 to ¦
0.1)
23: 55-h mean: -10.5 (-12.3 to -8.7)
LF: 5-min mean: -0.5 (-0.9 to-0.1)
23: 55-h mean: -9.8 (-12.4 to -7.2)
HF: 5-min mean: -0.9 (-1.2 to-0.5)
23: 55-h mean: -15.4 (-17.8 to-12.9)
LF/HF: 5-min mean: 0.3 (0.1, 0.6)
23: 55-h mean: 6.5 (4.5, 8.6)
H: 5-min mean: 0.1 (0.1, 0.2)
23: 55-h mean: 0.4 (0.2, 0.7)
Independent associations of short-term
averages (5-min means) of PM with HRV
by bus and nonbus periods
IQR for bus - 2.6 |Jg/m3) and
nonbus - 0.27 |Jg/m3)
% change (95%CI)
p-value of interaction
SDNN: Bus: -4.6 (-6.1 to -3.0)' Nonbus: -
0.1 (-0.3,0.1)
p-value for interaction: <0.0001
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
July 2009
E-22
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Auchincloss et al. (2008,
156234)
Period of Study: Jul 2000-Aug 2002
Location: 6 US communities (Baltimore
City and Baltimore County, Maryland
Chicago, Illinois
Forsyth County, North Carolina
Los Angeles, California
Northern Manhattan and the Bronx, New
York
and St. Paul, Minnesota)
part of MESA (Multi-ethnic Study of
Atherosclerosis)
Outcome: Blood pressure: systolic (SBP),
diastolic (DBP), mean arterial (MAP), pulse
pressure (PP)
Avg of 2nd and 3,d BP measurement used
for analyses
Age Groups: 45-84 years
Study Design: Cross-sectional (Multi-
Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis baseline
examination)
N: 5,112 persons (free of clinically
apparent cardiovascular disease)
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression
secondary analyses used log binomial
models to fit a binary hypertension
outcome
Covariates: Age, sex, race/ ethnicity, per
capita family income, education, BMI,
diabetes status, cigarette smoking status,
exposure to ETS, high alcohol use, physi-
cal activity, BP medication use,
meteorology variables, and copollutants
examined site as a potential confounder
and effect modifier
heterogeneity of effects also examined by
traffic-related exposures, age, sex, type 2
diabetes, hypertensive status, cigarette
use, by levels of SO2 and CO, and for
weather variables
Season: Adjusted for temperature and
barometric pressure to adjust for
seasonality (because seasons vary by the
study sites)
Also performed sensitivity analyses
adjusting for season to examine the
potential for residual confounding not
accounted for by weather variables
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 5 exposure metrics
constructed: prior day, avg of prior 2
days, prior 7 days, prior 30 days, and prior
60 days
Mean (SD): Prior day: 17.0(10.5)
Prior 2 days: 16.8 (9.3)
Prior 7 days: 17.0 (6.9)
Prior 30 days: 16.8 (5.0)
Prior 60 days: 16.7 (4.4)
Percentiles: NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Monitoring Stations: Used monitor
nearest the participant's residence to
calculate exposure metrics
Copollutant: SO2
NO?
CO
Traffic-related exposures (straight-line
distance to a highway
total road length around a residence)
Correlations with PM2.5 averaged over
prior 30 days:
O3
Cool: r - -0.67
Moderate: r - -0.30
Warm: r - 0.23
CO
Cool: r - 0.20
Moderate: r - 0.71
Warm: r - 0.23
SO2
Cool: r - 0.36
Moderate: r - -0.17
rMSSD: Bus: -2.6 (-4.2 to -0.9): Nonbus: ¦
0.3 (-0.5 to-0.1)
p-value for interaction: 0.64
pNN50 + 1: Bus: -2.0 (-4.5, 0.5): Nonbus:
¦0.5 (-0.8 to-0.1)
p-value for interaction: 0.34
LF: Bus: -6.0 (-9.3 to -2.5): Nonbus: -0.2
(-0.7, 0.3)
p-value for interaction: 0.028
HF: Bus: -5.8 (-9.1 to -2.3)
Nonbus: -0.9 (-1.4 to -0.4)
p-value for interaction: 0.50
LF/HF: Bus: -0.8 (-3.1,1.7)
Nonbus: 0.8(0.5,1.1)
p-value for interaction: <0.0001
H: Bus:-0.5 (-0.8 to-0.2)
Nonbus: 0.3(0.26,0.34)
p-value for interaction: <0.0001
Note: Exposure to health associations by
all lag periods presented in Figure 2
(magnitude of associations increased with
averaging period, with the largest
associations consistently found for 24-h
moving averages)
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3 (approx.
equivalent to difference between 90th and
10th percentile for prior 30 day mean)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Adjusted mean difference (95% CI) in PP
and SBP (mmHg) per 10 /yglm3 increase in
PM2.6 (averaged for the prior 30 days)
Pulse Pressure
(PM2.6 averaged for prior 30 days)
Adjustment variables:
Person-level Covariates: 1.04 (0.25,1.84),
p - 0.010
Person-level cov., weather: 1.12 (0.28,
1.97), p - 0.009
Person-level cov., weather, gaseous
copollutants: 2.66 (1.61, 3.71), p -
0.000
Person-level cov., study site: 0.93 (-0.04,
1.90), p - 0.060
Person-level cov., study site, weather:
1.11 (0.01, 2.22), p - 0.049
Person-level cov., study site, weather,
gaseous copollutants: 1.34 (0.10, 2.59),
p - 0.035
Systolic Blood Pressure
Adjustment variables:
Person-level Covariates: 0.66 (-0.41,1.74)
,p - 0.226
Person-level cov., weather: 0.99 (-0.15,
2.13), p - 0.089
Person-level cov., weather, gaseous
July 2009
E-23
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Dose-response Investigated? Assessed
nonlinear relationships-no evidence of
strong threshold/nonlinear effects for
PM2.6
Statistical Package: NR
Warm: r - -0.11
NO?
Cool: r - 0.55
Moderate: r - 0.66
Warm: 0.32
copollutants: 2.8 (1.38, 4.22), p - 0.000
Person-level cov., study site: 0.86 (-0.45,
2.17), p - 0.200
Person-level cov., study site, weather:
1.32 (-0.18, 2.82), p - 0.085
Person-level cov., study site, weather,
gaseous copollutants: 1.52 (-0.16, 3.21),
p - 0.077
Additional results: Associations became
stronger with longer averaging periods up
to 30 days. For example: Adjusted
(personal covariates and weather) mean
differences in PP: Prior day: -0.38 (-0.76,
0.00)
Prior 2 days:-0.22 (-0.65, 0.21)
Prior 7 days: 0.52 (-0.08,1.11)
Prior 30 days: 1.12 (0.28,1.97)
Prior 60 days: 1.08 (0.11,2.05)
(Pattern held for additional adjustments
and for SBP results
therefore, only results for 30-day mean
differences were presented)
Additional results (not presented):
None of DBP results were statistically
significant
results for MAP were similar to SBP,
though weaker and generally not
significant
Effect modification: associations
between PM2.6 and BP were stronger for
persons taking medications, with
hypertension, during warmer weather, in
the presence of high NO2, residing ~ 300m
from a highway, and surrounded by a high
density of roads (Fig 1)
associations were not modified by age,
sex, diabetes, cigarette smoking, study
site, high levels of CO or SO2, season , nor
residence ~ 400m fro a highway
Note: supplementary material available
on-line shows results for DBP and MAP,
among others
Reference: Baccarelli et al. (2009,
188183)
Period of Study: Nov 2000 - Jun 2005
Location: Boston, Mass
Outcome: Heart rate variability
Age Groups: elderly
Study Design: Panel
N:549 men
Statistical Analyses: Mixed-effects
model
Covariates: age, past/current CHD, BMI,
mean arterial pressure, fasting blood
glucose, smoking, alcohol consumption,
use of beta-blockers, CA channel blockers,
angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors,
room temperature, season, apparent
temperature
Season:no
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 48 h moving average
Geometric Mean (95%CI):
All Visits: 10.5(10.0,10.9)
Visits wI Genotype Data: 10.4 (9.9,11.0)
Visits w/o Genotype Data: 10.5 (9.8,
11.4)
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant: NR
Correlation: n/a
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Percent Change [Lower CI, Upper CI],
P:
All Subjects wf Genotype Data
SDNN:-6.0 (-13.5, 2.0), 0.14
HF: -17.1 (-32.3,1.6), 0.07
LF:-8.2 (-22.1, 8.2), 0.31
All Subjects
SDNN: -7.1 (-13.2,-0.6), 0.03
HF: -18.7 (-31.1,-4.0), 0.01
LF:-11.8 (-23.2,-1.3), 0.08
Statistical Package: SAS
July 2009
E-24
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Barclay et al. (2007,192229) Outcome: Haematological outcomes,
Heart Rhythm outcomes, & Heart Rate
Period of Study: Jan 2003 - May 2005 Variability outcomes
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
Age Groups: 70.4 (8.9)
Study Design: panel
N: 132 patients wf chronic heart failure
Statistical Analyses: Linear & Mixed
Effects Regression Model
Covariates: age, temperature, humidity,
pressure
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: lags 0-2d
Pollutant: PM2.B
Averaging Time: daily
Mean: 7.454
Min: 1.092
Max: 21.97
Monitoring Stations: 0
Copollutant: PMio, PNC, NO2
Co-pollutant Correlation
NO2 city: 0.164
NO city: 0.048
PM10 city: 0.476*
NO2 personal: 0.169
PNC DE0M: 0.115
PM2.6 traffic: 0.522*
PNC total: 0.367*
PNC traffic: 0.234
"correlations based on 3-day average
concentrations
Notes: PM2.6 values model predicted
PM Increment: NR
Beta (Lower CI, Upper CI):
Haemoglobin: -0.509 (-1.560, 0.542)
Mean corpuscular haemoglobin: 0.188 (¦
0.481,0.857)
Platelets: 3.022 (0.403, 5.642)
Haematocrit: -0.813 (-1.892, 0.267)
White blood cells: -1.652 (-4.727,1.424)
C reactive protein: 4.924 (-13.022,
22.869)
IL-6:-5.980 (-23.649,11.690)
von Willebrand factor: 1.363 (-6.561,
9.287)
E-selectin: 2.136 (-2.946, 7.217)
Fibrinogen: -5.579 (-10.403, -0.755)*
Factor VII: 3.747 (-1.959, 9.452)
d-dimer: 5.211 (-2.974,13.397)
All arrhythmias: -7.082 (-28.789,14.626)
Ventricular ectopic beats: -12.203 (¦
39.021,14.615)
Ventricular couplets: -1.255 (-25.678,
23.168)
Ventricular runs: -2.548 (-17.448,12.351)
Supraventricular ectopic beats: 4.898 (¦
19.772,29.568)
Supraventricular couplets: 6.138 (¦
16.242,28.518)
Supraventricular runs: -0.545 (-17.577,
16.487)
Average HR: 0.617 (-0.782, 2.016)
24h SDNN: 3.645 (-0.227, 7.517)
24h SDANN: 4.437 (0.030, 8.844)*
24h RMSSD: 0.617 (-0.782, 2.016)
24h PNN 50%: 11.247 (-6.228, 28.722)
24h LF power: 4.439 (-6.823,15.701)
24h LF normalized: -5.659 (-11.815,
0.497)
24h HF power: 3.800 (-10.863,18.464)
24hHF normalized:-6.597 (-13.724,
0.531)
24h LF/HF ratio: 1.033 (-8.355,10.414)
*p< 0.05
Notes: Estimates also available for PM2.6
traffic
LF - low frequency
HF- high frequency
Reference: Briet et al. (2007, 093049)
Period of Study: NR
Location: Paris, France
Outcome: Endothelial Function
Age Groups: 20-40 yrs
Study Design: panel
N: 40 white male nonsmokers
Statistical Analyses: Multiple Robust
Regrssion
Covariates: R53R/R53H genotype, diet,
subject factor, visit, temperature
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NCSS
Lags Considered: 0-5d
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24h
5 d Mean (SD): 28 (6)
Monitoring Stations: NR
Co-pollutant: PM10, SO2, NO, NO2, CO
Co-pollutant Correlation
n/a
PM Increment: 1 SD
Beta (Lower CI, Upper CI), P, R2:
Flow-mediated brachial artery dilation:
¦0.32 (-1.10, 0.46), NS, 0.04
Reactive hyperemia:
15.68(7.11,23.30), <0.0001,0.24
Changes in Endothelial function bit visits:
1.98(0.67, 3.259), 0.004,0.44
July 2009
E-25
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Cardenas et al. (2008,
191900)
Period of Study: NR
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Outcome: Heart Rate Variability
Age Groups: 20-40 yrs
Study Design: panel
N: 54 subjects
Statistical Analyses: Linear GEE models
Covariates: localization, supine position,
gender, age, humidity, heart rate,
orthostatic position, head-up tilt test
result
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: NR
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: NR
25", 50", 75" percentile:
Indoor: 14.8,28.3, 47.9
Outdoor: 6.4,10.8,16.8
Monitoring Stations: NR
Co-pollutant: NR
Co-pollutant Correlation
n/a
PM Increment: NR
Mean Difference (Lower CI, Upper CI),
lag:
Ln low frequency
Indoors:-0.028 (-0.0423,-0.0138)
Outdoors: -0.194 (-0.4509, 0.0627)
Ln high frequency
Indoors:-0.019 (-0.0338,-0.0044)
Outdoors:-0.298 (-0.5553,-0.0401)
Ln LF/HF ratio
Indoors:-0.017 (-0.0330,-0.0007)
Outdoors: -0.278 (-0.5540, 0.0030)
Reference: Cavallari et al. (2007,
157425)
Period of Study: 1999-2006
Location: Massachusetts
Outcome: Heart Rate Variability
Age Groups: 22-63
Study Design: panel
N: 36 males
Statistical Analyses: Mixed Effects
Regression Model
Covariates: age, smoking, heart rate at
work
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: lags 0-14h
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: hourly
Mean (SD): 1.12 (0.76)
Min: 0.12
Max: 3.99
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: NR
Co-pollutant Correlation
n/a
PM 1 mg Increment: Im3
Beta (Lower CI, Upper CI):
1.44 (¦
5.33 (¦
6.86 (¦
2.17 (¦
4.73 (¦
3.52 (¦
1.59 (
0.72 (¦
5.55 (¦
¦3.66
¦8.60
¦5.98
¦8.27
¦4.19
7.75, 4.87)
10.97,0.31)*
11.91,-1.81)*
9.33, 4.99)
11.99,2.53)
9.89, 2.84)
7.53, 4.35)
7.63, 6.20)
10.65,-0.45)*
(-8.85,1.53)
(-17.45, 0.24)*
(-14.67, 2.70)
(-17.00, 0.46)*
(-12.71,4.33)
Model 1
Laglh
Lag2h
Lag3h
Lag4h
Lag5h
Lag6h
Lag7h
Lag8h
Lag9h
Lag1Oh
Lag11h
Lag12h
Lag13h
Lag14h
Model 2
Laglh: 4.10 (-0.39, 8.60)*
Lag2h:-3.21, (-8.78, 2.37)
Lag3h: -6.45 (-11.59,-1.31)*
Lag4h: -0.01 (-6.96, 6.94)
Lag5h:-2.03 (-8.27, 4.22)
Lag6h:-1.99 (-8.46, 4.48)
Lag7h: -0.34 (-6.22, 5.54)
Lag8h: 0.72 (-6.35, 7.78)
Lag9h: -5.26 (-10.62, 0.11)*
Lag10h:-3.68 (-9.17,1.80)
Lag11h:-9.41 (-18.60,-0.23)*
Lag12h: -6.45 (-15.62, 2.72)
Lag13h: -7.33 (-16.55,1.89)
Lag14h: -4.75 (-13.81, 4.32)
*p< 0.05, *p<0.10
Notes: Model 1 adjusted for smoking
status & age only. Model 2 adjusted for
smoking status, age, & heart rate during
work.
July 2009
E-26
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Chahine et al. (2007,
156327)
Period of Study: Jan 2000 - Jun 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Outcome: Heart Rate Variability
Age Groups: mean 72.8(6.6) yrs
Study Design: panel
N: 539 white males
Statistical Analyses: Mixed Effects
Model
Covariates: age, BMI, mean arterial
pressure, fasting blood glucose, smoking,
alcohol consumption, use of beta-blockers,
calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors,
room temperature, season, outdoor
temperature
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 0-2d ma
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 1h
Mean (SD): 11.7 (7.8)
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant: PMi.o
Co-pollutant Correlation
n/a
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Percent Change (Lower CI, Upper CI),
p-value:
Iog10 SDIMIM
Total:-6.8 (-12.9,-0.2), 0.0436
GSTM1 wildtype:-2.0 (-11.3, 8.3),
0.6908
GSTM1 null:-10.5 (-18.2,-2.2), 0.0150
HM0X-1 <25 repeats: 7.4 (-8.7, 26.2),
0.3891
HM0X-1 >25 repeats: -8.5 (-14.8,-1.8),
0.0137
loglOHF
Total:-17.3 (-30.0,-2.3), 0.0263
GSTM1 wildtype: -4.0 (-24.8, 22.6),
0.7442
GSTM1 null:-24.2 (-39.2,-5.5), 0.0139
HM0X-1 < 25 repeats: 8.9 (-27.1, 62.8),
0.6759
HM0X-1 >25 repeats: -20.1 (-32.9,-5.0),
0.0115
loglOLF
Total: -11.2 (-22.8, 2.2), 0.0986
GSTM1 wildtype:-0.6 (-19.0, 22.0),
0.9545
GSTM1 null:-17.0 (-31.0,-0.2), 0.0478
HM0X-1 <25 repeats: 14.0 (-18.6,
59.5), 0.4465
HM0X-1 >25 repeats: -14.0 (-25.7,-0.5),
0.0430
Reference: Chen and Schwartz (2008,
190106)
Period of Study: 1989-1991
Location: US
Outcome: White Blood Cell count
Age Groups: 20-89 yrs
Study Design: panel
N: 2,978 participants
Statistical Analyses: Mixed Effects
Models
Covariates: age, sex, race, SES, smoking,
alcohol consumption, MS abnormalities,
indoor air pollutants, exercise
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: Stata
Lags Considered: NR
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean (SD): 36.8 (13.0) Median(range)
for
Qi: 23.1 (14.6-27.8)
02:31.2 (27.9-34.3)
03:38.8 (34.3-43.3)
Qt:53.7 (43.3-78.5)
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: NR
Co-pollutant Correlation
n/a
PM Increment: quartile, 1 yr avg (36.8
/yg/m3)
Average WBC count(SE) by PM
quartile:
Qi: 6760 (79)
02:6942 (99)
03:6895(84)
0*7109(61)
Beta(Lower CI, Upper CI), p-value:
Crude: 239 (58, 420), 0.01
Model 1:145 (10, 281), 0.035
Model 2:141 (6, 277), 0.041
Model 3:138 (2, 273), 0.046
Model 1: age, sex, race, SES, smoking,
alcohol consumption, MS abnormalities.
Model 2: Model 1 plus indoor air
pollutants, exercise. Model 3: clean areas
(Q1) vs. .other more polluted areas
July 2009
E-27
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Chuang et al. (2007, 091063)
Period of Study: Between Apr-Jim 2004
or 2005
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Outcome: High-sensitivity C-reactive
protein (hs-CRP)
Fibrinogen, plasminogen activator
fibrinogen inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), tissue-type
plasminogen activator (tPA), 8-hydroxy-2'-
deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), and log-
transformed HRV indices
(SDNN - standard deviation of NN
intervals, r-MSSD - square root of the
mean of the sum of the squares of
differences between adjacent NN
intervals, LF - low frequency [0.04-
0.15Hz], and HF - high frequency[0.15-
0.40Hz])
Age Groups: 18-25 yrs
Study Design: Panel (cross-sectional)
N: 76 students
Statistical Analyses: linear mixed-
effects models
Covariates: Age, sex, BMI, weekday,
temperature of previous day, relative
humidity
Season: Only 1 season of data collection
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Pollutant: PMio, nitrate, sulfate
Averaging Time: Hourly data used to
calculate averages over 1-3 day periods
Mean (SD): 1 -day avg: 31.8 (10.6)
2-day avg: 36.4 (12.6)
3-day avg: 36.5 (12.6)
Range (Min, Max): 1 -day avg: 16.2, 50.1
2-day avg: 15.0, 53.4
3-day avg: 12.7, 59.5
Monitoring Stations: 2 sites (each
pollutant measured at one site only)
Copollutant: PMio
Sulfate
Nitrate
0C
EC
NO?
CO
SO?
Os
PM2.5 Increment: IQR (1 -d avg: 20.4
2-day avg: 25.2
3-day avg: 20.0)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]: %
change in health endpoint per increase in
IQR of PM2.E (1-3 day averaging period
single pollutant models)
hs-CRP: 1-d: 90.2 (-10.2,190.1)
2-d: 99.1 (-26.1, 224.3)
3-d: 100.4 (-2.9, 203.7)
8-OHdG: 1-d:-5.0 (-14.3, 4.4)
2-d:-5.5 (-15.6, 4.6)
3-d: -5.6 (-13.8, 2.6)
PAI-1: 1-d: 20.4 (17.3, 33.5)
2-d: 16.2 (1.9, 30.5)
3-d: 20.0 (18.5, 31.5)
tPA: 1-d: 12.0 (-2.4, 26.3)
2-d: 12.0 (-2.9, 26.9);
3 d: 12.0 (-2.7, 26.6)
Fibrinogen: 1-d: 2.6 (-2.7, 7.8)
2-d: 1.5 (-4.1, 7.1);
3-d: 3.6 (-0.8, 8.1)
Heart Rate Variability
SDNN: 1-d: -4.0 (-6.1 to-1.9)
2-d:-2.5 (-4.6 to -0.4)
3-d: -3.0 (-5.0 to -1.1)
r-MSSD: 1-d: -3.0 (-8.7, 2.7)
2-d: -2.0 (-8.4, 4.4);
3-d:-3.6 (-8.8,1.6)
LF: 1-d:-3.1 (-6.1 to-0.1)
2-d:-3.2 (-4.6, 0.1);
3-d:-3.4 (-6.1 to -0.6)
HF: 1-d:-3.7 (-9.4, 2.1)
2-d: -2.1 (-8.4, 4.3);
3-d: -4.0 (-9.3,1.2)
July 2009
E-28
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Chuang et al. (2007, 091063)
Period of Study: Between Apr-Jim 2004
or 2005
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Outcome: High-sensitivity C-reactive
protein (hs-CRP)
Fibrinogen, plasminogen activator
fibrinogen inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), tissue-type
plasminogen activator (tPA), 8-hydroxy-2'-
deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), and log-
transformed HRV indices
(SDNN - standard deviation of NN
intervals, r-MSSD - square root of the
mean of the sum of the squares of
differences between adjacent NN
intervals, LF - low frequency [0.04-
0.15Hz], and HF - high frequency[0.15-
0.40Hz])
Age Groups: 18-25 yrs
Study Design: Panel (cross-sectional)
N: 76 students
Statistical Analyses: Linear mixed-
effects models
Covariates: Age, sex, BMI, weekday,
temperature of previous day, relative
humidity
Season: Only 1 season of data collection
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Pollutant: Nitrate
Averaging Time: Hourly data used to
calculate averages over 1-3 day periods
Mean (SD): 1 -day avg: 4.5 (2.7)
2-day avg: 4.7 (2.4)
3-day avg: 4.4(2.2)
Range (Min, Max): 1-day avg: 0.7,10.6
2-day avg: 0.7, 8.9
3-day avg: 0.8, 7.5
Monitoring Stations: 2 sites (each
pollutant measured at one site only)
Copollutant: PMio
Sulfate
PM2.6
0C
EC
NO?
CO
SO?
0s
Nitrate Increment: IQR (1 -d avg: 2.5
2-day avg: 4.0
3-day avg: 3.4)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]: %
change in health endpoint per increase in
IQR of nitrate (1-3 day averaging period
single pollutant models)
hs-CRP: 1-d:-2.1 (-21.9,17.8)
2-d:-11.6 (-58.6, 35.5)
3-d:-18.7 (-69.9, 32.5)
8-OHdG: 1-d: 9.0(4.0,14.1)
2-d: 15.1 (5.9,24.3)
3-d: 15.0 (4.9, 25.0)
PAI-1: 1-d: 4.0 (-2.5,10.4)
2-d: 11.6 (0.1, 23.1)
3-d: 16.9 (4.3, 29.4)
tPA: 1-d: 2.0 (-6.2,10.3)
2-d: 12.9 (-1.6, 27.5)
3-d: 10.0 (-5.8, 25.8)
Fibrinogen: 1-d: 1.6 (-1.3, 4.5)
2-d: 1.3 (-3.9, 6.5)
3-d: 1.0 (-4.6, 6.6)
Heart Rate Variability
SDNN: 1-d: -1.5 (-2.6 to -0.3)
2-d:-2.6 (-4.7 to -0.5)
3-d:-3.0 (-5.3 to -0.7)
r-MSSD: 1-d: -5.5 (-8.7 to-2.2)
2-d:-7.1 (-14.0 to-0.2)
3-d:-8.1 (-14.5 to-1.8)
LF: 1-d: -1.0 (-1.6 to-0.5)
2-d:-2.0 (-5.6,1.6)
3-d:-2.0 (-5.2,1.2)
HF: 1-d: -2.0 (-5.3,14[potential typo,
possibly 1.4])
2-d: -4.9 (-10.9, 0.9)
3-d:-6.9 (-13.4 to-0.3)
July 2009
E-29
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Chuang et al. (2007, 091063)
Period of Study: Between Apr-Jim 2004
or 2005
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Period of Study: NR
Location: Boston, MA
Outcome: High-sensitivity C-reactive
protein (hs-CRP)
Fibrinogen, plasminogen activator
fibrinogen inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), tissue-type
plasminogen activator (tPA), 8-hydroxy-2'-
deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), and log-
transformed HRV indices
(SDNN - standard deviation of NN
intervals, r-MSSD - square root of the
mean of the sum of the squares of
differences between adjacent NN
intervals, LF - low frequency [0.04-
0.15Hz], and HF - high frequency[0.15-
0.40Hz])
Age Groups: 18-25 yrs
Study Design: Panel (cross-sectional)
N: 76 students
Statistical Analyses: Linear mixed-
effects models
Covariates: Age, sex, BMI, weekday,
temperature of previous day, relative
humidity
Season: Only 1 season of data collection
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Age Groups: 43-75 yrs
Study Design: panel
N: 48 coronary artery disease patients
Statistical Analyses: Linear & Mixed
Logistic Regression models
Covariates: participant, day of week,
order of visit, visit date, hour of day,
hourly temperature
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: R
Lags Considered: lags 1-72h
Pollutant: Sulfate
Averaging Time: Hourly data used to
calculate averages over 1-3 day periods
Mean (SD): 1 -day avg: 4.1 (3.6)
2-day avg: 4.1 (3.7)
3-day avg: 3.9 (3.5)
Range (Min, Max): 1-day avg: 0.4,10.9
2-day avg: 0.4,11.9
3-day avg: 0.4,11.5
Monitoring Stations: 2 sites (each
pollutant measured at one site only)
Copollutant: PMio
PM2.6
Nitrate
0C
EC
NO?
CO
SO?
0s
Pollutant: PM2.B
Averaging Time: hourly
25", 50", 75" percentile:
12h avg: 6.18,8.91,13.18
24h avg: 6.38,9.20,13.31
Max:
12h avg: 37.13
24h avg: 40.38
Monitoring Stations: 1
Co-pollutant: BC, CO, O3, NO2, SO2
Co-pollutant Correlation
BC: 0.56
0s: 0.20
NO2: 0.38
SO2: 0.25
Sulfate Increment: IQR (1 -d avg: 3.9
2-day avg: 4.3
3-day avg: 3.8)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]: %
change in health endpoint per increase in
IQR of sulfate (1-3 day averaging period
single pollutant models)
hs-CRP: 1-d: 80.0(9.8,150.2)
2-d: 87.1 (14.9,159.4)
3 d: 71.1 (13.0,129.2)
8-OHdG: 1-d: 1.0(0.3,1.3)
2-d: -0.4 (-5.4, 4.7)
3-d:-0.3 (-4.3, 3.7)
PAI-1: 1-d: 12.0(5.4,18.7)
2-d: 13.3 (6.6,19.9)
3 d: 11.2 (5.7,16.6)
tPA: 1-d: 2.0 (-4.6, 8.7)
2-d: 3.8 (-2.8,10.3)
3 d: 3.0 (-2.3, 8.2)
Fibrinogen: 1-d: 2.9 (0.2, 5.5)
2-d: 2.8 (0.1, 5.5)
3-d: 2.2 (0.4, 4.7)
Heart Rate Variability
SDNN: 1-d:-3.1 (-4.1 to-2.1)
2-d: -4.1 (-5.2 to -3.1)
3-d:-2.0 (-2.9 to-1.2)
r-MSSD: 1-d: -5.0 (-8.0 to-2.0)
2-d:-6.0 (-8.9 to -2.9)
3-d:-5.7 (-8.2 to -3.2)
LF: 1-d:-3.4 (-4.9 to-1.8)
2-d:-3.0 (-4.5 to-1.5)
3-d:-3.0 (-4.3 to-1.7)
HF: 1-d: -3.5 (-6.5 to -0.4)
2-d:-3.9 (-7.0 to -0.8)
3-d:-3.0 (-5.5 to -0.5)
PM Increment: Interquartile Increase
Change (Lower CI, Upper CI):
12-hour mean
PM2.1,: -0.022 (-0.032,-0.012)
PM2.B+NO2:-0.023 (-0.034,-0.012)
PM2.B+ SO2:-0.009 (-0.02, 0.001)
PM2.B+ BC:-0.011 (-0.023, 0.001)
24-hour mean
PM2.B:-0.026 (-0.037,-0.015)
PM2.B+ NO2:-0.017 (-0.029, 0.004)
PM2.B+ SO2:-0.014 (-0.025,-0.002)
PM2.B+ BC: -0.012 (-0.026, 0.003)
Relative Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI):
12-hour mean
PM2.6: 1.02 (0.86,1.21)
PM2.6+ NO2: 0.99 (0.82,1.21)
PM2.B+ SO2: 0.87 (0.71,1.05)
PM2.B+ BC: 0.92(0.74,1.14)
24-hour mean
PM2.6: 1.22 (0.99,1.50)
PM2.B+NO2:1.00 (0.80,1.25)
PM2.B+ SO2:1.04 (0.83,1.30)
PM2.B+ BC: 0.87 (0.65, 1.17)
Mean (Lower CI, Upper CI):
12-hour mean
Myocardial Infarction: -0.042 (-0.057, ¦
0.026)
No Myocardial Infarction: -0.012 (-0.023,
0.00)
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
July 2009
E-30
Reference: Chuang et al. (2007, 098629) Outcome: ST Segment Depression
-------
Reference Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CTT
p- for interaction: 0.002
Visit 1: -0.102 (-0.12,-0.085)
Visits 2-4: 0.006(-0.005, 0.017)
p- for interaction: < 0.001
Diabetic: -0.097 (-0.119,-0.074)
Non-diabetic: -0.009 (-0.019, 0.002)
p- for interaction: < 0.001
Diurnal daytime pattern: -0.032 (-0.043, ¦
0.021)
Diurnal nighttime pattern: -0.006 (-0.018,
0.006)
p- for interaction: < 0.001
24-hour mean
Myocardial Infarction: -0.027 (-0.043, ¦
0.012)
No Myocardial Infarction: -0.025 (-0.038,
0.011)
p- for interaction: 0.787
Visit 1:-0.127 (-0.148,-0.105)
Visits 2-4: 0.001 (-0.011,0.013)
p- for interaction: < 0.001
Diabetic:-0.118 (-0.144,-0.091)
Non-diabetic: -0.13 (-0.024, -0.002)
p- for interaction: < 0.001
Diurnal daytime pattern: -0.031 (-0.043, ¦
0.020)
Diurnal nighttime pattern: -0.018 (-0.030,
¦0.005)
p- for interaction: 0.233
Notes: The effects of PM on half-hour St
segment levels (figure 1)
PM Increment: Interquartile Range
(27.02 /yglm3)
Beta (SE), p-value:
Flow mediated vasodilation (%): -0.016
(0.0072) p-0.03
Heart Rate (beats/min): 0.081 (0.135)
p — 0.55
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg): 0.088
(0.088) p-0.32
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg): -0.108
(0.006) p-0.48
Reference: Dales et al. (2007,155743)
Period of Study: NR
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Outcome: Vascular Reactivity
Age Groups: 18-50 yrs
Study Design: panel
N: 39 volunteers
Statistical Analyses: Mixed Effects
Model
Covariates: temperature, humidity, wind
speed, time of day testing was done, site
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: S-PLUS
Lags Considered: NR
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 2h
Mean (SD):
Downtown: 40 (20)
Tunney's Pasture: 10 (10)
p-value 0.000
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: PMi.o
Co-pollutant Correlation
n/a
July 2009
E-31
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: de Hartog et al. (2009,
191904)
Period of Study: 1998-1999
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Erfurt, Germany
and Helsinki, Finland
Outcome: Heart Rate Variability
Age Groups: 50 +
Study Design: panel
N: 122 coronary heart disease patients
Statistical Analyses: Linear Regression
Covariates: time trend, temperature,
humidity, pressure
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: lags 0-3d
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: daily
p25, p50, p75. p95:
Amsterdam: 10.4,16.7, 23.9, 47.0
Erfurt: 10.8,16.3, 26.7, 62.3
Helsinki: 8.3,10.6,15.9, 25.8
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: PM <0.1, PMo.i-i.o, NO2, SO2
Co-pollutant Correlation
NR
Note: Correlations are provided for
source-specific PM 2.6 & elements
PM Increment: 1 /yglm3
Beta (Lower CI, Upper CI):
SDNN
Local traffic:-0.12 (-0.36, 0.12)
Long-range transport: -0.04 (-0.14, 0.06)
Oil combustion: -0.29 (-1.04, 0.45)
Industry: 0.03 (-0.12, 0.19)
Crustal: 0.11 (-0.35,0.56)
Salt:-0.19 (-1.92,1.55)
HF
Local traffic: 0.43 (-0.91,1.79)
Long-range transport: 0.19 (-0.38, 0.77)
Oil combustion: 1.05 (-2.70, 4.94)
Industry: 0.62 (-0.34,1.59)
Crustal: 1.57 (-1.28, 4.50)
Salt:-1.43 (-9.86, 7.78)
SDNN
ABS: -0.52 (-1.39, 0.31)
S:-0.51 (-1.36,0.33)
V:-0.66 (-1.73, 0.41)
Zn: 0.12( 0.55, 0.79)
Ca: 0.27 (-0.58,1.11)
CI: 0.14 (-0.39, 0.67)
Fe: 0.15(-1.00,1.30)
Cu:-0.08 (-0.74, 0.57)
SDNN
ABS: 2.91 (-2.54,8.67)
S: 0.25(-4.42, 5.14)
V: 0.73 (-4.74, 6.53)
Zn: 3.85( 0.26, 8.13)
Ca: 3.39(-1.80, 8.86)
CI: 1.13(-1.48, 3.81)
Fe: 6.69(0.11,13.69)
Cu: 3.00 (-0.85, 7.00)
Notes: Estimates provided are for all
subjects at lag 1, estimates are also
available at lags 0, 2, and 3, as well as for
subjects wfo beta-blockers at lags 0-3.
July 2009
E-32
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: DeMeo et al. (2004, 087346) Outcome: Oxygen Saturation
Age Groups: 60.4 to 89.2 years
Period of Study: July through August
1999
Location: Boston, MA
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h
Study Design: Cross-sectional study
N: 28 adult participants
Statistical Analyses: GLM, Natural
Spline Smoothing, Regression Analysis,
Random-effects model
Covariates: Mean temperature, Dew
point temperature, Barometric pressure,
Medication use
Season: Summer
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package:
S-PLUS, SAS
Lags Considered: Hourly lags between 2
and 7 h
PM Increment: IQR (13.42/yg/m3)
increase
6 h: 13.42/yg/m3
12 h: 10.81 /yglm3
24 h: 10.26/yg/m3
48: 10.57/yg|m3
Overall: 0.172% (-0.313, 0.031) decrease
6-h: -0.769% (-1.21 to -0.327) decrease
B-blocker users: -0.062% (-0.248, 0.123)
Rest: 6 h:-0.173 (-0.345 to-0.001)
12 h:-0.160 (-0.308 to-0.012)
24 h:-0.169 (-0.316 to-0.022)
48 h:-0.153 (-0.304, 0.002)
Exercise: 6 h: -0.005 (-0.215, 0.205)
12 h:-0.014 (-0.196, 0.168)
24 h: 0.001 (-0.180,0.182)
48 h:-0.011 (-0.196, 0.174)
Post exercise Rest: 6 h: -0.173 (-0.332 to
¦0.014)
12 h:-0.128 (-0.266, 0.010)
4 h:-0.113 (-0.250, 0.023)
48 h:-0.157 (-295 to-0.019)
Paced breathing: 6 h: -0.142 (-0.292,
0.007)
12 h:-0.139 (-0.269 to-0.010)
24 h:-0.121 (-0.248, 0.007)
48 h:-0.082 (0.211, 0.047)
Summary over protocol
6 h:-0.131 (-0.247 to-0.015)
12 h:-0.120 (-0.221, 0.020)
24 h: -0.112 (-0.212 to -0.013)
Notes: Figure of the Variation in Oxygen
Saturation during the first rest period
versus individual hourly lag measurements
for PM2.6
July 2009
E-33
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Diez-Roux et al. (2006,
156400)
Period of Study: Baseline data collected
June 2000-Aug 2002
Location: USA (6 field centers: Baltimore,
MD
Chicago, IL
Forsyth Co, NC
Los Angeles, CA
New York, NY
St. Paul, MN
Outcome: C-reactive protein (CRP)
assessed continuously and as a
dichotomous variable (cutpoint, 3 mg/L)
interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Age Groups: 45-84 yrs
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 5634 persons
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression
& logistic regression
Covariates: Age, sex, race/ethnicity,
general health status, BMI, diabetes,
cigarette status, secondhand smoke,
physical activity, arthritis flare in last 2
weeks, medications, infections in last 2
weeks (also ran models including site,
copollutants, and weather)
Season: Examined seasonal patterns in
the residuals of fully adjusted models
stratified by season
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: Prior day, prior 2 days,
prior week, prior 30 days, and prior 60
days
Mean (SD): Presented in Fig 1 by site
Percentiles: Presented in Fig 1 by site
Range: NR
Monitoring Stations: NR
Long-term exposure to PM estimated
based on residential history reported
retrospectively
all addresses geocoded
ambient AP obtained from US EPA
Copollutant: SO2
NO?
CO
03
PM Increment: 10 |Jgfm3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Adjusted (all personal-level covariates)
relative difference in CRP (mg/L) per 10
|jg/m3 increase in PM2.6
Prior day: 0.99 (0.96,1.01)
Prior 2 days: 0.99 (0.96,1.01)
Prior 7 days: 1.00 (0.96,1.04)
Prior 30 days: 1.03 (0.98,1.10)
Prior 60 days: 1.04 (0.97,1.11)
Odds Ratios of CRP of a 3 mg/L per 10
|jg/m3 increase in PM2.6 (adjusted for all
personal-level covariates)
Prior day: 0.98 (0.92,1.04)
Prior 2 days: 0.99 (0.93,1.06)
Prior 7 days: 1.05 (0.96,1.15)
Prior 30 days: 1.12 (0.98,1.29)
Prior 60 days: 1.12 (0.96,1.32)
Reference: Dubowsky et al. (2006,
088750)
Period of Study: March-Jun 2002
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Outcome: White blood cells (WBC), C-
reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Age Groups: a 60 yrs
Study Design: Panel (4 planned repeated
measures
n - 35 participated in 4 trips)
N: 44 participants
Statistical Analyses: Linear mixed
models
Covariates: Sex, obesity, diabetes,
smoking history, time-varying parameters
(apparent temperature, h, day, trip,
residence, mold, pollen, illness, and juice
intake), medication and vitamin
consumption (day of blood draw)
Season: Limited data collection period
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS v8.02
Pollutant: PM2.6 (ambient)
Averaging Time: Hourly data used to
calculate avg concentrations over 1-7
days preceding the blood draw (ambient
PM2.6)
microenvironmental PM2.6 measures were
averaged over the 1-2 days preceding the
blood draw
Mean (SD) (1-day): 16 (6.0)
Percentiles (1 -day): 0: 6.5
25th: 12
75th: 22
100th: 28
Monitoring Stations: 1 ambient monitor
Copollutant: PM2.6 (ambient)
BC (ambient)
PM2.6 (microenvironment)
CO
NO2
SO2
Os
PM Increment: 6.1 /yg/m3 (5-d mean)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Note: Most results presented in figures.
Selected result in abstract text: % change
in WBC per increase in IQR (5.4 /yg/m3) of
PM2.E averaged over the previous week:
5.5(0.1,11)
Associations (% changes and 95%CI)
between 5-day mean ambient
concentrations and markers of
inflammation per increase (IQR) in
pollutant.
CRP: All participants: 14 (-5.4, 37)
Among those with all 3 conditions
(diabetes, obesity, and hypertension): 81
(21,172)
Among those with at least 2 of the
conditions: 11 (-7.3, 33)
IL-6: All participants: -2.1 (-13,11)
Among those with all 3 conditions
(diabetes, obesity, and hypertension): 23
(-5.3, 59)
Among those with at least 2 of the
conditions: -3.1 (-14, 9.7)
WBC (x109/L): All participants: 3.4 (-1.8,
8.9)
Among those with all 3 conditions
(diabetes, obesity, and hypertension): 0.4
(-8.8,11)
Among those with at least 2 of the
conditions: 3.6 (-1.7, 9.1)
July 2009
E-34
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Dubowsky et al. (2006,
088750)
Period of Study: March-Jun 2002
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Outcome: White blood cells (WBC), C-
reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Age Groups: a 60 yrs
Study Design: Panel (4 planned repeated
measures
n - 35 participated in 4 trips)
N: 44 participants
Statistical Analyses: Linear mixed
models
Covariates: Sex, obesity, diabetes,
smoking history, time-varying parameters
(apparent temperature, h, day, trip,
residence, mold, pollen, illness, and juice
intake), medication and vitamin
consumption (day of blood draw)
Season: Limited data collection period
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS v8.02
Pollutant: BC (ngfm3) (ambient)
Averaging Time: Hourly data used to
calculate avg concentrations over 1-7
days preceding the blood draw (ambient
PM)
microenvironmental PM2.6 measures were
averaged over the 1-2 days preceding the
blood draw
Mean (SD) (1-day): 900 (280)
Percentiles (1 -day): 0: 290
25th: 730
75th: 1,100
100th: 1,400
Monitoring Stations: 1 ambient monitor
Copollutant: PM2.6 (ambient)
BC (ambient)
PM2.6 (microenvironment)
CO; NO2
SO?
0s
PM Increment: 230 ng/m3 (5-d mean)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Note: Most results presented in figures.
Associations (% changes and 95%CI)
between 5-day mean ambient
concentrations and markers of
inflammation per increase (IQR) in
pollutant.
CRP: All participants: 13 (-0.34, 28)
Among those with all 3 conditions
(diabetes, obesity, and hypertension): 49
(16, 90)
Among those with at least 2 of the
conditions: 9.0 (-3.8, 24)
IL-6: All participants: -0.8 (-8.9, 8.0)
Among those with all 3 conditions
(diabetes, obesity, and hypertension): 15
(-2.2, 35)
Among those with at least 2 of the
conditions: -2.7 (-11, 6.2)
WBC (x10B/L): All participants: 1.3 (-2.1,
4.8)
Among those with all 3 conditions
(diabetes, obesity, and hypertension): 0.05
(-5.9, 6.3)
Among those with at least 2 of the
conditions: 1.5 (-2.0, 5.1)
Reference: Ebelt et al. (2005, 056907)
Period of Study: Summer of 1998
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Outcome: CVD
Age Groups: range from 54-86 yrs
mean age - 74 years
Study Design: extended analysis of a
repeated-measures panel study
N: 16 persons with C0PD
Statistical Analyses:
Earlier analysis expanded by developing
mixed-effect regression models and by
evaluating additional exposure indicators
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS V8
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD):
Ambient PM2.6:11.4 ± 4.6
Exposure to ambient PM2.6: 7.9 ± 3.7
Range (Min, Max): Ambient PM2.6: 4.2 -
28.7
Exposure to ambient PM2.6: 0.9 ¦ 21.3
Monitoring Stations: 5
Copollutant (correlation):
Ambient concentrations and exposure to
ambient PM were highly correlated for
each respective metric: r a 0.71
Note: Total personal fine particle
exposure (T) were dominated by exposures
to non ambient particles which were not
correlated with ambient fine particle
exposure (A) or ambient concentrations
(C). Results for each of these metrics are
listed.
PM Increment:
Increment: C26: IQR - 5.8
SBP (mm Hg):-1.70 (-3.48-0.08)
DBP (mm Hg): -0.58 (-2.02-0.85)
Ln-SVE (bph): 0.20 (0.00-0.40)
HR (bpm): 0.93 (-0.90-2.75)
SDNN (ms): -4.37 (-9.40-0.65)
R-MSSD (ms):-2.79 (-6.16-0.57)
Increment: NS C26: IQR - 4.2
SBP (mm Hg):-1.52 (-2.94- -0.09)
DBP (mm Hg): -0.77 (-1.87-0.32)
Ln-SVE (bph): 0.19 (-0.01-0.38)
HR (bpm): 1.03 (-0.43-2.48)
SDNN (ms): -3.83 (-7.77-0.11)
R-MSSD (ms):-2.90 (-5.55- -0.25)
Increment: S_C26: IQR - 1.5
SBP (mm Hg):-1.10 (-3.48-1.28)
DBP (mm Hg): 0.76 (-1.15-2.68)
Ln-SVE (bph): 0.09 (-0.05-0.23)
HR (bpm):-0.42 (-2.28-1.44)
SDNN (ms):-3.14 (-9.73-3.45)
R-MSSD (ms): 0.24 (-5.14-5.63)
Increment: A26: IQR - 4.4
SBP (mm Hg):-1.90 (-3.66--0.14)
DBP (mm Hg): -0.33 (-1.72-1.06)
Ln-SVE (bph): 0.20 (0.02-0.37)
HR (bpm): 0.57 (-1.34-2.47)
SDNN (ms): -3.91 (-8.79-0.97)
R-MSSD (ms):-1.05 (-4.79-2.17)
Increment: NS A2 6: IQR - 3.4
July 2009
E-35
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
SBP (mm Hg): -1.70 (-3.27- -0.14)
DBP (mm Hg):-0.51 (-1.71-0.70)
Ln-SVE (bph): 0.20 (0.02-0.37)
HR (bpm): 0.69 (-0.96-2.35)
SDNN (ms):-4.18 (-8.51-0.15)
R-MSSD (ms):-1.40 (-4.40-1.60)
Increment: S T2 6: IQR - 0.9
SBP (mm Hg):-1.55 (-3.35-0.26)
DBP (mm Hg): 0.49 (-0.91-1.90)
Ln-SVE (bph): 0.08 (-0.14-0.19)
HR (bpm):-0.24 (-1.75-1.26)
SDNN (ms): -0.68 (-4.74-3.38)
R-MSSD (ms): 0.91 (-3.51-5.33)
Increment: T26: IQR - 10.1
SBP (mm Hg):-1.26 (-2.60-0.08)
DBP (mm Hg): 0.34 (-1.26-1.94)
Ln-SVE (bph): 0.01 (-0.10-0.11)
HR (bpm):-0.23 (-1.09-0.63)
SDNN (ms): -2.11 (-4.90-0.68)
R-MSSD (ms):-0.83 (-3.60-1.94)
Increment: N26: IQR - 8.9
SBP (mm Hg):-0.81 (-2.15-0.53)
DBP (mm Hg): 0.40 (-1.19-1.98)
Ln-SVE (bph):-0.04 (-0.18-0.10)
HR (bpm):-0.35 (-0.85-0.14)
SDNN (ms):-1.10 (-3.10-0.90)
R-MSSD (ms):-0.54 (-2.54-1.46)
Reference: Fan et al. (2008,191979)
Period of Study: Feb - May 2005
Location: Paterson, New Jersey
Outcome: Cardiopulmonary Health (FEV,
FVC, PEF, SDNN, HR)
Age Groups: 61.2 (13.7)
Study Design: panel
N: 11
Statistical Analyses: Mixed Effects
models, Linear Regression models
Covariates: temperature, humidity
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 0
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: daily
Mean (SD): |
APM2.6 avg
Morning: 35.2 (25.9)
Afternoon: 24.1 (22.1)
APM2.6 peak
Morning: 71.3 (56.1)
Afternoon: 64.3 (43.5)
Range:
APM2.6 avg
Morning: 1.1-87
Afternoon: 1.2-98
APM2.6 peak
Morning: 4.0 ¦ 278
Afternoon: 3.0 ¦ 150
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: NR
Co-pollutant Correlation
n/a
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Beta (SE), p-value:
ASDNN
Morning, APM2.6 avg
15min: -14.5 (6.9), 0.06
2h:-18.9 (4.2), 0.0002
4h: -2.5 (8.6), 0.78
Morning, APM2.6 peak
15min: -9.2 (11.2), 0.43
2h: -5.1 (13.8), 0.72
4h: -7.4 (12.0), 0.55
Afternoon, APM2.6 avg
15min: -2.4 (7.6), 0.77
2h: -20.2 (10.8), 0.10
4h: -0.7 (11.2), 0.95
Afternoon, APM2.6 peak
15min: 0.6 (8.9), 0.95
2h: 19.2(14.6), 0.23
4h: -6.8 (14.1), 0.64
A HR
Morning, APM2.6 avg
15min: 1.2(3.1), 0.71
2h: -5.5 (2.9), 0.08
4h: -3.1 (4.6),0.51
Morning, APM2.6 peak
15min: 0.8 (4.4), 0.86
2h: -7.2 (4.2), 0.11
4h: -7.1 (6.3),0.28
Afternoon, APM2.6 avg
15min: -2.0 (4.0), 0.62
2h: 0.9 (5.4), 0.87
4h: 8.2(5.2), 0.14
Afternoon, APM2.6 peak
15min: -5.6 (5.3), 0.31
2h: 3.1 (8.1), 0.71
4h: 11.1 (8.1),0.20
AFEVi
Morning, APM2.6 avg: 0.02 (0.04), 0.68
Morning, APM2.6 peak: -0.13 (0.08), 0.16
A FVC
JVIomincj^APM^^
July 2009
E-36
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Morning, APM2.6 peak: -0.12 (0.17), 0.51
A PEF
Morning, APM2.6 avg: -0.54 (0.62), 0.42
Morning, APM2.6 peak: -1.46 (1.12), 0.24
Notes: Estimates relative to increases in
the average and peak PM2.B
concentrations
Reference: Folino et al. (2009,191902)
Period of Study: Jun 2006 - May 2007
Location: Padua, Italy
Outcome: HRV 81 Inflammatory Markers
Age Groups: 45-65 yrs
Study Design: panel
N: 39 patients wf myocardial infarction
Statistical Analyses: Linear Regression
Model, ANOVA
Covariates: temperature, relative
humidity, atmospheric pressure, beta-
blocker, aspirin, or nitrate consumption,
smoking habit
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: Stata
Lags Considered: NR
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean (SD):
Summer: 33.9 (12.7)
Winter: 62.1 (27.9)
Spring: 30.8 (14.0)
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: PM10.PM02E
Co-pollutant Correlation
NR
PM Increment: 1 /yglm3
Beta (SE), p-value:
SDNN: 0.109 (0.1151,0.345
SDANN: 0.127 (0.1261,0.314
RMSSD: 0.045 (0.040), 0.256
pH: 0.002 (0.0011,0.041
LTB4: 0.590 (0.324), 0.069
eNO: -0.002 (0.003), 0.503
PTX3:-0.004 (0.002), 0.013
C-reactive protein: -0.008 (0.005), 0.115
CC16:-0.002 (0.002), 0.410
IL-8: 0.000 (0.003), 0.989
Reference: Folino et al. (2009,191902)
Period of Study: Jun 2006 - May 2007
Location: Padua, Italy
Outcome: HRV 81 Inflammatory Markers
Age Groups: 45-65 yrs
Study Design: panel
N: 39 patients wf myocardial infarction
Statistical Analyses: Linear Regression
Model, ANOVA
Covariates: temperature, relative
humidity, atmospheric pressure, beta-
blocker, aspirin, or nitrate consumption,
smoking habit
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: Stata
Lags Considered: NR
Pollutant: PM0.26
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean (SD):
Summer: 17.6 (7.5)
Winter: 30.5(17.4)
Spring: 18.8 (10.8)
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: PM10.PM2 E
Co-pollutant Correlation
NR
PM Increment: 1 /yglm3
Beta (SE), p-value:
SDNN: 0.214(0.2041,0.295
SDANN: 0.214(0.2141,0.316
RMSSD: 0.081 (0.077), 0.291
pH: 0.005 (0.002), 0.004
LTB4: 0.835 (0.5331,0.117
eNO:-0.006 (0.005), 0.182
PTX3:-0.006 (0.003), 0.071
C-reactive protein: -0.011 (0.007), 0.104
CC16: 0.001 (0.004), 0.890
IL-8:-0.004 (0.006), 0.527
Reference: Goldberg et al. (2008,
180380)
Period of Study: Jul 2002 - Oct 2003
Location: Montreal, Canada
Outcome: Oxygen saturation 81 pulse rate
Age Groups: 50-85 yrs
Study Design: panel
N: 31
Statistical Analyses: Mixed Random
Effects Model
Covariates: body temperature,
consumption of salt, intake of fluids, being NO2: 0.62
ill the day before, ambient temperature,
relative humidity, barometric pressure
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: Splus
Lags Considered: lags 1d 81 0-2d avg
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: daily
IQR: 7.3
Monitoring Stations: 8
Co-pollutant: CO, NO2, SO2, O3
Co-pollutant Correlation
CO: 0.72
PM Increment: Interquartile Range (7.3
//g/m3)
Mean Difference (Lower CI, Upper CI),
lag:
Oxygen Saturation
-0.087 (-0.143, -0.031), lag 0
-0.058 (-0.114, -0.002), I
-0.083 (-0.155, -0.010), I
|1
0.056(-0.117, 0.005), lag 0
0.019(-0.079, 0.041), lag 1
0.039(-0.118, 0.039), lag 0-2d
Unadjusted
Unadjusted
Unadjusted
0-2d avg
Adjusted
Adjusted
Adjusted:
avg
Pu|sg p ate
Unadjusted: 0.226 (-0.037, 0.489), lag 0
Unadjusted: 0.288 (0.022, 0.554), lag 1
Unadjusted: 0.420 (0.067, 0.772), lag 0-
2d avg
Adjusted: 0.158 (-0.136, 0.451), lag 0
Adjusted: 0.246 (-0.040, 0.531), lag 1
Adjusted: 0.353 (-0.034, 0.740), lag 0-2d
avg
July 2009
E-37
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Goldberg et al. (2008,
180380)
Period of Study: Jul 2002 - Oct 2003
Location: Montreal, Canada
Outcome: Shortness of Breath & General
health
Age Groups: 50-85 yrs
Study Design: panel
N: 31
Statistical Analyses: Mixed Random
Effects Model
Covariates: body temperature,
consumption of salt, intake of fluids, being
ill the day before, ambient temperature,
relative humidity, barometric pressure
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: Splus
Lags Considered: lags 0-4d & 0-2d avg
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: daily
Mean: 9.5
Median: 7.0
Min: 0.8
Max: 50.2
IQR: 7.3
Monitoring Stations: 8
Co-pollutant: CO, NO2, SO2, O3
Co-pollutant Correlation
CO: 0.66
NO?: 0.54
O3: 0.32
SO2: 0.50
PM Increment: Interquartile Range (7.3
j"g/m3)
Mean Difference (Lower CI, Upper CI),
lag:
General Health
Unadjusted: -0.317 (-0.699, 0.064), lag 0
Unadjusted: -0.284 (-0.670, 0.103), lag 1
Unadjusted: -0.048 (-0.427, 0.332), lag 2
Unadjusted: -0.241 (-0.620, 0.139), lag 3
Unadjusted: -0.010 (-0.390, 0.370), lag 4
Unadjusted: -0.482 (-1.053, 0.090), lag 0-
2d avg
Adjusted: -0.125 (-0
Adjusted: -0.167 (-0
Adjusted: -0.081 (-0.
Adjusted: -0.222 (-0
Adjusted: 0.016 (-0.:
Adjusted: -0.281 (-0
avg
Shortness of breath at night
Unadjusted: -0.421 (-0.847, 0.006), lag 0
Unadjusted: -0.278 (-0.711, 0.155), lag 1
Unadjusted: -0.100 (-0.526, 0.327), lag 2
Unadjusted: -0.220 (-0.645, 0.206), lag 3
Unadjusted: -0.206 (-0.632, 0.220), lag 4
Unadjusted: -0.555 (-1.172, 0.063), lag 0-
2d avg
Adjusted:-0.171 (-0.639, 0.297), lag 0
Adjusted:-0.130 (-0.579, 0.319), lag 1
Adjusted:-0.127 (-0.553, 0.299), lag 2
Adjusted:-0.192 (-0.616, 0.231), lag 3
Adjusted:-0.171 (-0.594, 0.253), lag 4
Adjusted:-0.301 (-0.952, 0.350), lag 0-2d
avg
545, 0.295), lag 0
568, 0.234), lag 1
464, 0.302), lag 2
602, 0.157), lag 3
364, 0.396), lag 4
886, 0.325), lag 0-2d
Reference: Ibald-Mulli et al. (2004,
087415)
Period of Study: winter 1998-1999
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Erfurt, Germany
Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Outcome: Blood Pressure 81 Heart Rate
Age Groups: 40-84
Study Design: panel
N: 131 adults wICHD
Statistical Analyses: Linear Regression
Covariates: trend, day of week,
temperature, barometric pressure, relative
humidity, medication use
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 0-2, 5d avg
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean (SD):
Downtown: 40 (20)
Tunney's Pasture: 10 (10)
p-value 0.000
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: PM1.0
Co-pollutant Correlation
n/a
PM Increment: Interquartile Range
(27.02 /yglm3)
Beta (SE), p-value:
Flow mediated vasodilation (%):
¦0.016 (0.0072) p-0.03
Heart Rate (beats/min):
0.081 (0.135) p-0.55
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg):
0.088 (0.088) p-0.32
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg):
¦0.108 (0.006) p-0.48
Reference: Langrish et al. (2009,
191908)
Period of Study: August 2008
Location: Beijing, China
Outcome: Cardiovascular Effects
Age Groups: median 28 yrs
Study Design: panel
N: 15
Statistical Analyses: NR
Covariates: NR
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: NR
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: NR
Mean:
W/o mask: 86
Wlmask: 140
Monitoring Stations: NR
Co-pollutant: CO, SO2, NO2
Co-pollutant Correlation:
n/a
PM Increment: NR
Mean (Lower CI, Upper CI):
W/o Mask (Day)
SBP: 100(104,116)
DBP: 73 (69, 76)
MAP: 85(81,88)
Heart Rate: 79 (74, 84)
Avg NN interval: 829 (789, 869)
pNN50: 15.9(10.7,21.0)
RMSSD: 35.1 (29.2,41.0)
SDNN: 61.2(54.9, 67.5)
Triangular index: 12.9 (11.9,13.9)
LF power: 816(628,1004)
HF power: 460 (325, 595)
LFn: 62.8(56.7,68.9)
HFn: 29.2(25.5, 32.8)
HF/LF ratio: 0.738 (0.507, 0.970)
W/ Mask (Day)
SBP: 109(104,114)
DBP: 73 (70-76)
MAP: 85(81,89)
July 2009
E-38
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% Cl)
Heart Rate: 78 (73, 82)
Avg NN interval: 850 (805, 896)
pNN50: 17.9(14.2,21.6)
RMSSD: 37.1 (32.2,42.0)
SDNN: 65.5(59.0,72.2)*
Triangular index: 13.8 (13.0,14.5)
LF power: 919 (717,1122)*
HF power: 485 (400, 569)
LFn: 64.5 (60.6, 68.4)
HFn: 30.0 (27.0, 33.1)
HF/LF ratio: 0.680 (0.519,0.842)
Wfo Mask (During Walk)
SBP: 121 (115,127)
DBP: 81 (75-87)
MAP: 94 (89, 99)
Heart Rate: 88 (82, 94)
Avg NN interval: 594 (562, 627)
pNN50: 3.3(0.8, 5.7)
RMSSD: 17.2 (13.4, 21.0)
SDNN: 45.8 (36.8, 54.8)
Triangular index: 10.7 (9.1,12.4)
LF power: 313(170, 455)
HF power: 76.5(33.6,120.0)
LFn: 68.2(60.9,75.5)
HFn: 16.1 (11.9, 20.3)
HF/LF ratio: 0.259 (0.173,0.344)
Wf Mask (During Walk)
SBP: 114(108,120)
DBP: 79 (74, 83)
MAP: 90 (86, 94)
Heart Rate: 91 (85, 97)
Avg NN interval: 613 (571, 655)
pNN50: 2.1 (-0.1,4.4)
RMSSD: 20.0 (15.5, 24.6)
SDNN: 54.8 (42.5, 67.0)
Triangular index: 11.4(9.4,13.3)
Wf Mask (During Walk)
LF power: 414(233, 595)
HF power: 116.8(52.6,181.0)
LFn: 67.9(61.9,73.9)
HFn: 16.0(12.5,19.4)
HF/LF ratio: 0.247 (0.180,0.314)
Mean (SD):
W/o Mask (After Walk)
Headache: 2.53 (5.55)
Dizziness: 1.07 (2.22)
Tiredness: 8.47 (12.14)
Sickness: 1.07 (2.22)
Cough: 1.80(4.80)
Difficulty Breathing: 0.67 (0.90)
Eye irritation: 1.40 (3.60)
Throat irritation: 1.47 (4.07)
Nose irritation: 1.53 (3.78)
Unpleasant Smell: 0.93 (1.22)
Bad taste: 0.73 (0.96)
Difficulty walking: 12.53 (13.24)
Perception of Pollution: 19.80 (18.37)
W| Mask (After Walk)
Headache: 0.73 (1.03)
Dizziness: 0.80 (1.57
Tiredness: 7.40 (9.37)
Sickness: 0.87 (1.51)
Cough: 1.00(1.73)
Difficulty Breathing: 3.80 (8.10)
Eye irritation: 1.67 (3.27)
Throat irritation: 1.07 (2.63)
Nose irritation: 1.07 (1.91)
Unpleasant Smell: 0.60 (0.91)
Bad taste: 0.60 (1.18)
Difficulty walking: 15.13 (11.51)
Perception of Pollution: 11.60 (10.44)
*p< 0.05
Notes: Estimates also available for 24
July 2009
E-39
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
hours, night, before walk, and 24 hours
after walk.
Reference: Lanki et al. (2006, 088412)
Period of Study: Autumn 1998-spring
1999
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Outcome: ST segment depressions (2
endpoints: >0.1 mV regardless of the
direction of the ST slope and >0.1mV
with horizontal or downward slope
[stricter criteria])
Age Groups: Mean - 68.2 (6.5) yrs
Study Design: Panel
N: 45 elderly nonsmoking persons with
stable coronary heart disease
342 total exercise tests for analyses
Statistical Analyses: Generalized
additive models with penalized splines
(logistic regression)
principal components analysis and linear
regression of 13 measured elements used
to apportion PM2.6 mass between different
sources
Covariates: Subject, linear terms for time
trend, temperature, relative humidity,
penalized spline for change in heart rate
during the exercise test
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: S-plus 2000 and R
Pollutant: PM2.6 (Analyses conducted for
source specific PM2.6)
Averaging Time: Daily filter samples
Mean: Crustal: 0.6
Long-range transported: 6.4
Oil combustion: 1.6
Salt: 0.9
Local traffic: 2.9
Total: 12.8
Percentiles: Crustal
25: 0.0
50: 0.4
75: 1.1;
Max: 5.3
Long-range transported
25: 2.2
50: 5.5
75: 9.8;
Max: 26.5
Oil combustion
25: 0.6
50: 1.3
75: 2.3;
Max: 12.2
Salt
25: 0.3
50: 0.8
75: 1.2;
Max: 5.9
Local traffic
25: 1.7
50: 2.5
75: 3.4;
Max: 12.0
Total
25: 8.3
50: 10.6
75:15.9;
Max: 39.8
Monitoring Stations: 1 monitor
Copollutant (correlation): Correlations
with PM2.6: Crustal: r - -0.01
Long-range transported: r - 0.82
Oil combustion: r - 0.35
Salt: r - 0.19
Local traffic: r - 0.26
PM Increment: 1 /yglm3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Adjusted ORs between daily source-
specific PM2.6 concentrations and ST
segment depressions. ST segment
depression defined as >0.1 mV (n - 62)
Crustal
LagO: 0.80 (0.47,1.36)
Lag1:0.66 (0.40,1.10)
Lag2:1.18 (0.68, 2.06)
Lag3:1.87 (0.85, 4.09)
Long-range transport
LagO: 0.94 (0.84,1.05)
Lag1:1.00 (0.92,1.08)
Lag2:1.11 (1.02,1.20)
Lag3:1.06 (0.95,1.18)
Oil combustion
LagO: 0.87 (0.57,1.32)
Lag1:1.04 (0.75,1.45)
Lag2:1.10 (0.83,1.46)
Lag3:1.12 (0.79,1.58)
Salt
LagO: 1.03 (0.57,1.85)
Lag1: 0.72 (0.37,1.40)
Lag2: 0.66 (0.31,1.40)
Lag3:1.55 (0.83, 2.89)
Local traffic
LagO: 0.91 (0.69,1.21)
Lag1:1.22 (0.88,1.69)
Lag2:1.53 (1.19,1.97)
Lag3: 0.98 (0.78,1.23)
ST segment depression defined as >0.1
mV with horizontal or downward slope
(n - 46)
Crustal
LagO: 0.76 (0.42,1.35)
Lag1: 0.41 (0.22, 0.79)
Lag2:1.17 (0.65, 2.09)
Lag3:1.60 (0.72, 3.59)
Long-range transport
LagO: 0.98 (0.86,1.10)
Lag1:1.03 (0.95,1.12)
Lag2:1.11 (1.02,1.21)
Lag3:1.02 (0.95,1.10)
Oil combustion
LagO: 0.95 (0.61,1.49)
Lag1:1.13 (0.76,1.68)
Lag2:1.33 (0.98,1.80)
Lag3:1.29 (0.90,1.86)
Salt
LagO: 1.15 (0.56, 2.38)
Lag1:0.90 (0.44,1.81)
Lag2:1.39 (0.63, 3.08)
Lag3:1.93 (1.00, 3.72)
Local traffic
LagO: 0.89 (0.64,1.23)
Lag1:1.21 (0.86,1.71)
Lag2:1.37 (1.03,1.83)
Lag3:1.03 (0.80,1.32)
Adjusted ORs for the association of
indicator elements of PM2.6 sources and
ST segment depressions in multipollutant
models (models include all 5 indicator
elements). ST segment depression defined
as >0.1 mV (n - 62)
Si (Crustal)
July 2009
E-40
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
LagO: 0.73 (0.39,1.38)
Lag1: 0.48 (0.25, 0.93)
Lag2: 0.78 (0.35,1.71)
Lag3:1.95 (0.69, 5.48)
S (Long-range transport)
LagO: 0.70 (0.25,1.95)
Lag1:0.58 (0.23,1.47)
Lag2:1.08 (0.44,2.63)
Lag3:1.60 (0.73, 3.48)
Ni (Oil combustion)
LagO: 0.78 (0.30, 2.04)
Lag1:1.20 (0.58, 2.46)
Lag2:1.15 (0.61, 2.18)
Lag3:1.02 (0.41,2.54)
CI (Salt)
LagO: 1.03 (0.79,1.34)
Lag1:0.88 (0.56,1.38)
Lag2:1.02 (0.62,1.69)
Lag3:1.27 (0.85,1.91)
ABS (Local traffic)
LagO: 0.92 (0.36, 2.37)
Lag1:1.83 (0.73, 4.59)
Lag2: 4.46 (1.69,11.79)
Lag3: 0.92 (0.40, 2.12)
ST segment depression defined as >0.1
mV with horizontal or downward slope
(n - 46)
Si (Crustal)
LagO: 0.67 (0.33,1.36)
Lag1: 0.34 (0.15, 0.81)
Lag2: 0.81 (0.33, 2.00)
Lag3:1.90 (0.64,5.65)
S (Long-range transport)
LagO: 0.84 (0.29, 2.47)
Lag1:0.89 (0.34,2.32)
Lag2:1.36 (0.54,3.45)
Lag3:1.12 (0.53, 2.40)
Ni (Oil combustion)
LagO: 1.10 (0.36, 3.37)
Lag1:1.16 (0.45, 2.96)
Lag2:1.64 (0.84,3.20)
Lag3:1.63 (0.64,4.14)
CI (Salt)
LagO: 1.13 (0.80,1.62)
Lag1:0.99 (0.58,1.68)
Lag2:1.55 (0.87, 2.76)
Lag3:1.45 (0.94,2.25)
ABS (Local traffic)
LagO: 0.74 (0.25, 2.23)
Lag1:1.76 (0.62, 5.00)
Lag2: 4.86 (1.55,15.26)
Lag3: 0.97 (0.39, 2.41)
July 2009
E-41
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Lanki et al. (2008,191984)
Period of Study: Jan 1999 - Apr 1999
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Outcome: ST Segment Depress
>0.1 mV
Age Groups: 50 +
Study Design: panel
N: 41 elderly people wf CHD
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
Model
Covariates: long-term time trend,
temperature, humidity, change in heart
rate following exercise test
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: R
Lags Considered: lags 0-24h
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: hourly
25", 50", 75", Max:
Personal PM2.6
1 h: 6.9,11.2,15.8, 41.5
4h: 5.9,10.0,14.6, 41.3
sslon 8h: 5.0, 7.9,13.0, 34.9
12h: 5.2,7.8,12.1,28.8
22h: 6.6, 9.3,13.0, 30.2
Outdoor PM2.6
1 h: 8.9,12.9,17.8, 42.9
4h: 8.8,12.5,17.6, 40.8
8h: 8.3,12.1,17.2, 39.2
12h: 8.3,11.9,17.0, 37.0
24h: 9.0,12.5,17.7, 30.5
Monitoring Stations: 1
Co-pollutant: PM
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ljungman et al. (2008,
180266)
Period of Study: Aug 2001 - Dec 2006
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Outcome: Ventricular Arrhythmia
Age Groups: 28-85 yrs
Study Design: case-crossover
N: 88 patients wf implantable cardioverter
defibrillators
Statistical Analyses: conditional logistic
regression
Covariates: temperature, humidity,
pressure, ischemic heart disease, ejection
fraction, heart disease, diabetes, use of
beta-blockers, age, BMI, location at time
of arrhythmia, distance from air pollution
monitor
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: Stata, S-plus
Lags Considered: lags 2-24h
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: hourly
Median:
2h: 9.17
24h: 9.49
Min:
2h: 0.15
24h: 2.97
Max:
2h: 99.25
24h: 47.07
IQR:
2h: 6.69
24h: 5.27
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant: PMio, NO2
Co-pollutant Correlation
NR
PM Increment: Interquartile
Odds Ratio (Lower CI, Upper CI):
2h: 1.23 (0.84,1.80)
24h: 1.28(0.90,1.84)
Notes: OR of ventricular arrhythmia for an
IQR increase of air pollutants in different
subgroups (figure 2)
Reference: Ljungman et al. (2009,
191983)
Period of Study: May 2003 - July 2004
Location: Athens, Greece
Helsinki, Finland
Ausburg, Germany
Barcelona, Spain
Rome, Italy
Stokholm, Sweeden
Outcome: lnterleukin-6 Response
Age Groups: 35-80 yrs
Study Design: panel
N: 955 male myocardial infarction
survivors
Statistical Analyses: Additive Mixed
Models
Covariates: age, sex, BMI, city, HDL/total
cholesterol, smoking, alcohol intake,
HbA1c, NT-proBNP, history of Ml, heart
failure, or diabetes, phlegm
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 1d
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean: 17.7
25": 10.9
75": 21.9
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: CO, NO2, PNC, PM2.6
Co-pollutant Correlation
PM10: 0.81
PM Increment: Interquartile Range (11.0
j"g/m3)
Change of IL-6 (Lower CI, Upper CI), p-
value:
0.6 (-0.8, 2.0), 0.40
Reference: Luttman-Gibson et al. (2006,
089794)
Period of Study: June-December 2000
Location: Steubenville, OH
Outcome: Heart rate variability
Age Groups:
Study Design: Panel study
N: 32 participants
Statistical Analysis: Linear mixed
models
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 1 h
24 h
Mean (IQR)
PM2.6: 20.0(15.2)
Sulfate: 6.9 (5.1)
EC: 1.1 (0.6)
Copollutant: NO2, SO2, O3
PM Increment: IQR
Percent change (95% CI): Each 13.4
/yg/m3 increase in 24 hour mean PM2.6
concentration was associated with:
SDNN: -4.0% (95% CI:-7.0% to-0.9%)
r-MSSD: -6.5% (95% CI: -12.1 % to -0.6%)
HF: -11.4% (95% CI:-21.5% to-0.1%)
Each 5.1 /yglm3 increase in sulfates on the
previous day was associated with: SDNN:
¦3.3% (95% CI:-6.0% to-0.5%)
r-MSSD: -5.6% (95% CI:-10.7%, 0.2%)
HF: -10.3% (95% CI:-19.5% to-0.1%)
Notes: The authors conclude that
increases in both traffic related particles
and sulfates may adversely effect
autonomic function.
July 2009
E-43
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Mar et al. (2005, 087566)
Period of Study: 1999-2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Outcome: Change in arterial O2
saturation, heart rate, and blood pressure
(SBP and DBP)
Age Groups: >75 years
Study Design: Panel study
N: 88 elderly subjects
Statistical Analysis: GEE
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): Personal: 9.3(8.4)
Indoor: 7.4 (4.8)
Outdoor: 9.0 (4.6)
PM Increment: 10 |jg/m3
Unit change in measure (95% CI):
Among all subjects: Each increase in
outdoor same day PM2.6 was associated
with: SBP: -0.81 mmHg (95% CI: -2.34,
0.73)
DBP:-0.46 mmHg (95% CI:-1.49, 0.57)
H: -0.75 beats/min (95% CI: -1.42 to ¦
0.07)
Each increase in indoor same day PM2.6
was associated with: SBP: 0.92 mmHg
(95% CI: -2.04, 3.87)
DBP: 0.38 mmHg (95% CI:-1.43, 2.20)
H: 0.22 beats/min (95% CI:-0.71,1.16)
Each increase in personal same day PM2.6
was associated with: SBP: 0.37 mmHg
(95% CI:-0.93,1.67)
DBP: -0.20 mmHg (95% CI: -0.85, 0.46)
H: 0.44 beats/min (95% CI: 0.04, 0.84)
Notes: Results by health status presented
in Figure 1
Used 2 sessions that each were 10
consecutive days of measurements
Used personal, indoor, and outdoor
measures of PM2.6
Reference: Metzgeret al. (2007,
092856)
Period of Study: August 1998-
December 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Outcome: Days with any event recorded
by the ICD, days with ICD
sliocksi'defibrillation and days with either
cardiac pacing or defibrillation
Study Design: Repeated measures
N: 884 subjects between 1993 and 2002
Statistical Analysis: Logistic regression
with GEE to account for residual
autocorrelation within subjects
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): PM2.b: 17.8 (8.6)
PM2.6 sulfates: 5.0 (3.4)
PM2.6 EC: 1.7 (1.2)
PM2.6 0C: 4.4 (2.4)
PM2.6 water-soluble metals: 0.029 (0.024)
Percentiles: PM2.6: Median: 16.2
PM2.6 sulfates: Median: 4.1
PM2.6 EC: Median: 1.4
PM2.6 0C: Median: 3.9
PM2.E water-soluble metals: Median:
0.022
Copollutant: O3
NO2
CO
SO2
oxygenated hydrocarbons
PM Increment: OR (95% CI):
Outcome - Any event recorded by ICD
PM2.6
OR - 1.00
(95% CI: 0.95,1.04)
PM2.6 EC
OR - 1.01
(95% CI: 0.98,1.05)
PM2.6 oc
OR - 1.01
(95% CI: 0.98,1.03)
PM2.6 Sulfates
OR - 0.99
(95% CI: 0.93,1.06)
PM2.E Water soluble metals
OR - 0.95
(95% CI: 0.90,1.00
Reference: O'Neill et al. (2007, 091362)
Period of Study: May 1998-Dec 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Outcome: Soluble intercellular adhesion
molecule 1 (ICAM-1)
vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-
von Willebrand factor (vWF)
Age Groups: Mean (SD): 56.6 (10.6)
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 92 participants (type 2 diabetic
patients)
Statistical Analyses: linear regression
Covariates: Apparent temperature,
season, age, race, sex, glycosylated
hemoglobin, cholesterol, smoking history,
BMI
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h (lagged moving
averages of days 0 to 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5)
Mean (SD): 11.4 (5.9)
descriptive statistics represent entire
study period
Percentiles: IQR range: 7.6
Range (Min, Max): 0.07, 33.7)
Monitoring Stations: 1 site
Copollutant: PM2.6
BC
SO42-
PM Increment: IQR (specific to lag
period)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
change per IQR of PM2.6
ICAM-1 - All subjects
LagO: 2.87 (-4.63,10.95)
2 dma: 2.25 (-5.15,10.22)
3 dma: 1.48 (-5.63, 9.11)
4 dma: 1.80 (-4.98, 9.07)
5 dma: 1.51 (-5.30, 8.80)
6 dma: 2.12 (-4.23, 8.89)
Subjects not known to be taking
statins
LagO: 5.47 (-3.74,15.57)
2 dma: 5.70 (-3.70,16.01)
3 dma: 4.57 (-4.31,14.27)
4 dma: 4.57 (-4.27,14.23)
5 dma: 3.80 (-4.84,13.22)
6 dma: 3.79 (-4.49,12.80)
July 2009
E-44
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Statistical Package: NR
Subjects who report smoking in the
past (but not within 6 monthsl
LagO: 0.9 (-9.56,12.66)
2 dma: 0.40 (-12.08,14.65)
3 dma: 1.34 (-9.23,13.14)
4 dma: 2.29 (-6.84,12.30)
5 dma: 1.09 (-8.30,11.44)
6 dma: 3.08 (-6.30,13.40);
Subjects who did not report smoking
in the past
Lag 0: 0.46 (-8.23, 9.97)
2 dma: 1.37 (-7.96,11.65)
3 dma: -0.96 (-10.01, 9.00)
4 dma: -1.34 (-10.35, 8.58)
5 dma: -0.87 (-10.17, 9.40)
6 dma: -1.78 (-10.64, 7.94)
VCAM-1 - All subjects
LagO: 6.88 (-2.88,17.62)
2 dma: 8.18 (-1.43,18.72)
3 dma: 6.92 (-1.66,16.25)
4 dma: 6.46 (-1.16,14.66)
5 dma: 8.57 (0.05,17.80)
6 dma: 11.76(3.48, 20.70)
Subjects not known to be taking
statins
LagO: 10.26 (-0.64, 22.35)
2 dma: 15.02(3.76, 27.49)
3 dma: 14.59(3.94,26.34)
4 dma: 15.15(4.54,26.84)
5 dma: 16.16(5.77, 27.58)
6 dma: 17.66(7.77, 28.45)
Subjects who report smoking in the
past (but not within 6 months)
LagO: 13.2 (-1.30, 29.72)
2 dma: 18.4 (0.69,39.33)
3 dma: 15.7 (1.19,32.30)
4 dma: 13.1 (0.88,26.78)
5 dma: 13.2(0.49,27.58)
6 dma: 16.2(3.76,30.10)
Subjects who did not report smoking
in the past
Lag 0: -3.12 (-12.41, 7.17)
2 dma: -0.34 (-10.57,11.05)
3 dma:-1.09 (-11.15,10.12)
4 dma:-0.81 (-10.91,10.43)
5 dma: 2.07 (-8.59,13.96)
6 dma: 4.89 (-5.56,16.50)
vWF - All subjects
LagO: 15.16 (-9.79, 47.01)
2 dma: 12.57 (-9.19, 39.55)
3 dma: 25.14 (-9.87, 73.74)
4 dma: 23.42 (-9.47, 68.25)
5 dma: 17.92 (-10.22, 54.87)
6 dma: 20.48 (-8.82, 59.22)
Subjects not known to be taking
statins
LagO: 7.40 (-19.82, 43.88)
2 dma: 7.10 (-19.09, 41.76)
3 dma: 10.78 (-17.92, 49.52)
4 dma: 11.61 (-16.64, 49.42)
5 dma: 9.15 (-20.32, 49.53)
6 dma: 7.91 (-20.70, 46.85)
Subjects who report smoking in the
past (but not within 6 months)
LagO: 19.23 (-24.29, 87.77)
2 dma: 19.92 (-29.65,104.41)
3 dma: 29.54 (-17.24,102.76)
4 dma: 41.98 (-6.95,116.63)
5 dma: 44.05 (-1.23,110.07)
6 dma: 50.39(9.35,106.82)
Subjects who did not report smoking
_iiithejjast^^^^^^_^^^^^^_
July 2009
E-45
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Lag 0
¦14.21 (-53.20, 57.24)
2 dma
¦20.66 (-63.14, 70.77)
3 dma
¦28.89 (-68.43, 60.19)
4 dma
¦23.51 (-55.11,30.34)
5 dma
¦29.18 (-60.08, 25.66)
6 dma
¦30.68 (-55.95, 9.08)
Reference: O'Neill et al. (2007, 091362) Outcome: Soluble intercellular adhesion
molecule 1 (ICAM-1)
Period of Study: May 1998-Dec 2002
Location: Boston, MA
vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-
1)
von Willebrand factor (vWF)
Age Groups: Mean (SD): 56.6 (10.6)
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 92 participants (type 2 diabetic
patients)
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression
Covariates: Apparent temperature,
season, age, race, sex, glycosylated
hemoglobin, cholesterol, smoking history,
BMI
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Pollutant: BC
Averaging Time: 24 h (lagged moving
averages of days 0 to 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5)
Mean (SD): 1.1 (0.8)
descriptive statistics represent entire
study period
Percentiles: IQR range: 0.8
Range (Min, Max): 0.2, 5.8
Monitoring Stations: 1 site
Copollutant: PM2.6
BC
S042-
PM Increment: IQR (specific to lag
period)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]: 9
change perIQR of BC
ICAM-1- -All subjects
LagO: 5.09 (-2.37,13.11)
2 dma: 3.97 (-10.24, 20.42)
3 dma: 5.10 (-10.17, 22.96)
4 dma: 8.38 (-6.46, 25.56)
5 dma: 10.09 (-7.36, 30.83)
6 dma: 10.58 (-5.34, 29.18)
Subjects not known to be taking
statins
LagO: 5.77 (-3.92,16.44)
2 dma: 2.39 (-7.65,13.52)
3 dma: 0.84 (-8.16,10.73)
4 dma: 1.67 (-6.71,10.80)
5 dma: 1.55 (-6.46,10.24)
6 dma: 2.20 (-6.47,11.68)
Subjects who report smoking in the
past (but not within 6 months)
LagO: 5.84 (0.87,11.05)
2 dma: 5.08 (-2.34,13.07)
3 dma: 4.44 (-2.70,12.11)
4 dma: 5.02 (-1.78,12.29)
5 dma: 5.89 (-2.14,14.58)
6 dma: 6.73 (-1.54,15.70)
Subjects who did not report smoking
in the past
LagO: 6.04 (0.87,11.48)
2 dma: 6.54 (-1.64,15.39)
3 dma: 5.86 (-1.90,14.22)
4 dma: 6.11 (-1.18,13.94)
5 dma: 6.89 (-1.42,15.89)
6 dma: 7.86 (-1.35,17.94)
VCAM-1 - All subjects
LagO: 9.26(2.98,15.91)
2 dma: 10.18 (1.93,19.10)
3 dma: 15.45 (2.70, 29.78)
4 dma: 17.97(3.63, 34.30)
5 dma: 23.83(8.41,41.44)
6 dma: 27.51 (11.96, 45.21)
Subjects not known to be taking
statins
LagO: 9.19(3.23,15.49)
2 dma: 14.64 (5.02, 25.14)
3 dma: 14.39(5.30, 24.28)
4 dma: 14.19(5.71,23.36)
5 dma: 19.11 (9.44,29.65)
6 dma: 22.60(11.79, 34.45)
Subjects who report smoking in the
past (but not within 6 months)
LagO: 12.4(2.77, 22.92)
2 dma: 28.5 (8.38, 52.24)
3 dma: 25.14(3.50,51.30)
4 dma: 23.1 (2.70,47.58)
5 dma: 32.0(7.29,62.30)
6 dma: 31.8(9.74,58.26)
Subjects who did not report smoking
in the past
LagO: 5.15 (-5.63,17.17)
2 dma: 2.09 (-9.07 ,14.61)
3 dma: 3.90 (-6.38,15.31)
4 dma: 4.92(4.63,15.43)
5 dma: 7.89 (-1.31,17.95)
July 2009
E-46
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
6 dma: 10.97(0.98,21.96)
vWF- All subjects
LagO: 7.96(4.34,21.84)
2 dma: 14.87 (-2.85, 35.82)
3 dma: 15.34 (-3.22, 37.45)
4 dma: 15.47 (-7.60, 44.31)
5 dma: 19.50 (-8.89, 56.74)
6 dma: 20.53 (-9.80, 61.05)
Subjects not known to be taking
statins
LagO: 3.23 (-8.91,17.00)
2 dma: 9.82 (-8.39, 31.66)
3 dma: 17.79 (-16.03, 65.21)
4 dma: 13.14 (-18.71, 57.47)
5 dma: 16.14 (-20.43, 69.52)
6 dma: 13.25 (-22.09, 64.62)
Subjects who report smoking in the
past (but not within 6 months)
LagO: 7.63 (-17.01, 39.58)
2 dma: 37.64 (-7.18,104.10)
3 dma: 75.41 (6.16,189.85)
4 dma: 72.05 (-3.34, 206.22)
5 dma: 73.14(6.94,180.32)
6 dma: 71.23(14.00,157.19)
Subjects who did not report smoking
in the past
LagO: 10.22 (-23.14, 58.04)
2 dma: 17.07 (-18.86, 68.91)
3 dma: 6.56 (-42.75, 98.36)
4 dma: -9.20 (-65.79,140.99)
5 dma:-23.86 (-71.05,100.29)
6 dma: -48.69 (-77.75,18.29)
Reference: O'Neill et al. (2005, 088423)
Period of Study:
Baseline period: May 1998—January 2000 n'tro9'Yce™ mediated)
Outcome: Changes in vascular reactivity,
specifically percent change in brachial
artery diameter (flow-mediated and
Time trial: 2000-2002
Location: Boston, MA
N: 270 patients with diabetes or at risk of
diabetes, who participated in non-air pollu-
tion related studies at the Joselyn
Diabetes Center in Boston
Statistical Analysis: Linear regression
Pollutant: PM2.6
Mean (SD): 11.5 (6.4)
Range: 1.1-40.0
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant: Sulfates
BC
Ultrafine particle counts
PM Increment: IQR (value not given)
Percent change (95% CI): PM2.6 6-day
moving avg
Nitroglycerin-mediated reactivity: -7.6%
(95% CI: 12.8% to-2.1%)
Notes: PM2.6 was positively associated
with nitroglycerin-mediated reactivity
an association was also reported with
ultrafine particles. Effect estimates were
larger in type II than type I diabetes. BC
and sulfate increases were associated
with decreased flow-mediated reactivity
among those with diabetes. Although the
largest associations were with the 6-day
moving avg, similar patterns and
quantitatively similar results appear in the
other lags.
Reference: O'Neill et al. (2007, 091362) Outcome: soluble intercellular adhesion
molecule 1 (ICAM-1)
Period of Study: May 1998-Dec 2002
Location: Boston, MA
vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-
1)
von Willebrand factor (vWF)
Mean Age: 56.6 (10.6)
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 92 participants (type 2 diabetic
patients)
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression
Covariates: Apparent temperature,
season, age, race, sex, glycosylated
hemoglobin, cholesterol, smoking history,
BMI
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Pollutant: S042-
Averaging Time: 24 h (lagged moving
averages of days 0 to 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5)
Mean (SD): 3.0 (2.0)
descriptive statistics represent entire
study period
Percentiles: IQR range: 2.2
Range (Min, Max): 0.5, 9.6)
Monitoring Stations: 1 site
Copollutant: PM2.6, BC, S042~
PM Increment: IQR (specific to lag
period)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
change per IQR of PM2.6
ICAM-1 All subjects
LagO: 5.30 (-2.60,13.83)
2 dma: 4.02 (-3.26,11.85)
3 dma: 4.03 (-5.34,14.34)
4 dma: -0.79 (-7.30, 6.18)
5 dma: 1.06 (-7.10, 9.93)
6 dma: 3.15 (-5.66,12.78)
Subjects not known to be taking
statins
LagO: 10.14(0.44,20.77)
2 dma: 9.39 (-1.28, 21.20)
3 dma: 10.93 (-2.23, 25.85)
4 dma: -0.24 (-9.66,10.16)
5 dma: 4.03 (-8.66,18.47)
6 dma: 5.66 (-7.52, 20.72)
Subjects who report smoking in the
July 2009
E-47
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
past (but not within 6 months)
Lag 0: -4.00 (-24.79, 22.52)
2 dma: -4.82 (-18.01,10.48)
3 dma: -7.19 (-23.66,12.83)
4 dma:-9.8 (-27.96,12.97)
5 dma:-10.4 (-29.92,14.44)
6 dma: -6.8 (-25.72,17.03)
Subjects who did not report smoking
in the past
LagO: 6.67 (-4.34,18.94)
2 dma: 5.65 (-4.67,17.10)
3 dma: 10.21 (-5.83,28.99)
4 dma: 0.80 (-9.94,12.83)
5 dma: 2.80 (-10.85,18.54)
6 dma: 5.15 (-7.78,19.89)
VCAM-1 All subjects
LagO: -0.04 (-3.75, 3.80)
2 dma: 0.94 (-4.79, 7.01)
3 dma: -0.87 (-3.50,1.82)
4 dma: 0.13 (-2.02, 2.34)
5 dma: -0.47 (-2.67,1.78)
6 dma: -0.46 (-1.99,1.09)
Subjects not known to be taking
statins
Lag 0: -1.34 (-11.23, 9.66)
2 dma:-0.19 (-11.13,12.09)
3 dma: -2.84 (-13.90, 9.64)
4 dma: 4.28 (-6.18,15.90)
5 dma:-0.26 (-13.44,14.93)
6 dma:-3.44 (-16.51,11.67)
Subjects who report smoking in the
past (but not within 6 months)
Lag 0: 0.07 (-23.40, 30.73)
2 dma:-5.62 (-20.77,12.43)
3 dma: -26.92 (-33.31 to-19.91)
4 dma:-3.06 (-28.01,30.56)
5 dma: -6.42 (-30.75, 26.47)
6 dma: -6.46 (-28.55, 22.47)
Subjects who did not report smoking
in the past
Lag 0: -3.28 (-12.66, 7.12)
2 dma:-3.17 (-11.75, 6.23)
3 dma:-9.67 (-22.07, 4.70)
4 dma: -5.51 (-14.28, 4.15)
5 dma:-12.17 (-22.05 to-1.05)
6 dma: -11.77 (-20.95 to -1.52)
vWF (sulfate measures not available)
Reference: Park et al. (2008,156845)
Period of Study: Jan 1995—Jun 2005
Location: Greater Boston area, MA
Outcome: Total homocysteine (tHcy)
Mean Age: 73.6 ± 6.9 yrs
Study Design: Cross-sectional and
longitudinal analyses performed
N:960 men
Statistical Analyses: Generalized
additive models (also hierarchical mixed-
effects regression models to assess
repeated measures of tHcy)
Covariates: Model 1: season, age, long-
term trend, apparent temperature
Model 2: further adjustment for BMI,
systolic blood pressure, smoking status,
pack years of cigarettes, alcohol consump-
tion
Model 3: further adjustment for serum
creatinine, plasma folate, vitamin B6, and
vitamin B12
Dose-response Investigated? Modeled
continuous covariates as penalized splines
to determine if association with tHcy was
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h (moving averages
up to 7 days prior to blood collection)
Mean (SD): 12.0 (6.6)
Median: 10.6
Range (Min, Max): 2.0, 62.0
Monitoring Stations: 1 site
Copollutant: PM2.6
BC (r - 0.51)
0C (r - 0.51)
S042 (r - 0.85)
PM Increment: IQR
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Estimated % change in tHcy per IQR
increase in pollutant.
Lag model
Concurrent day. IQR: 7.66
Model 1:1.32 (-0.83, 3.52)
Model 2:1.55 (-0.77, 3.91)
Model 3:1.57 (-0.38, 3.56)
1-day previous. IQR: 6.91
Model 1:-1.43 (-3.51, 0.69)
Model 2:-1.41 (-3.53,0.76)
Model 3:-1.28 (-3.12, 0.60)
2-day moving avg. IQR: 6.47
Model 1:0.04 (-2.13, 2.26)
Model 2:-0.07 (-2.26,2.17)
Model 3: 0.25 (-1.69, 2.22)
3-day moving avg. IQR: 5.83
Model 1:-0.64 (-2.92,1.69)
Model 2:-0.74 (-3.04,1.61)
Model 3:-0.59 (-2.63,1.49)
July 2009
E-48
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
linear
Statistical Package: R software
4-day moving avg. IQR: 5.21
Model 1:-0.63 (-2.94,1.72)
Model 2:-0.86 (-3.19,1.52)
Model 3: 0.73 (-2.78,1.37)
5-day moving avg. IQR: 4.68
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
0.51 (-2.79,1.83)
¦0.82 (-3.13,1.54)
¦0.84 (-2.85,1.22)
6-day moving avg. IQR: 4.50
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
:-0.91 (-3.32,1.56)
:-1.32 (-3.76,1.17)
:-1.44 (-3.58, 0.74)
7-day moving avg. IQR: 4.20
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
:-0.84 (-3.27,1.64)
:-1.19 (-3.64,1.33)
:-1.69 (-3.84, 0.51)
Stratified analyses: No significant
difference in effect of PM2.6 among those
with high and low levels of vitamins
Reference: Park et al. (2008,156845)
Period of Study: Jan 1995—Jun 2005
Location: Greater Boston area, MA
Outcome: Total homocysteine (tHcy)
Mean Age: 73.6 ± 6.9 yrs
Study Design: cross-sectional and
longitudinal analyses performed
N:960 men
Statistical Analyses: Generalized
additive models (also hierarchical mixed-
effects regression models to assess
repeated measures of tHcy)
Covariates: Model 1: season, age, long-
term trend, apparent temperature
Model 2: further adjustment for BMI,
systolic blood pressure, smoking status,
pack years of cigarettes, alcohol
consumption
Model 3: further adjustment for serum
creatinine, plasma folate, vitamin B6, and
vitamin B12
Dose-response Investigated? Modeled
continuous covariates as penalized splines
to determine if association with tHcy was
linear
Statistical Package: R software
Pollutant: BC
Averaging Time: 24 h (moving averages
up to 7 days prior to blood collection)
Mean (SD): 0.99 (0.56)
Median: 0.87
Range (Min, Max): 0.07, 3.7
Monitoring Stations: 1 site
Copollutant
(correlation): PM2.6 (r - 0.51)
BC
OC (r - 0.0.51)
SO42 (r - 0.50)
PM Increment: IQR
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Estimated % change in tHcy per IQR
increase in pollutant.
Lag model Concurrent day. IQR: 0.66
Model 1:2.64 (-0.12, 5.48)
Model 2: 2.62 (-0.17, 5.48)
Model 3: 3.13 (0.76, 5.55)
1 -day previous. IQR: 0.66
Model 1:1.46 (-0.98, 3.96)
Model 2:1.32 (-1.14,3.85)
Model 3: 0.95 (-1.12, 3.05)
2-day moving avg. IQR: 0.60
Model 1:2.75 (-0.18, 5.76)
Model 2: 2.63 (-0.33, 5.67)
Model 3: 2.59 (0.10, 5.14)
3-day moving avg. IQR: 0.57
Model 1:2.95 (-0.44,6.46)
Model 2: 2.97 (-0.46, 6.51)
Model 3: 3.12 (0.21, 6.11)
4-day moving avg. IQR: 0.52
Model 1:3.94 (0.24,7.78)
Model 2: 3.76(0.02,7.64)
Model 3: 3.00 (-0.13, 6.22)
5-day moving avg. IQR: 0.49
Model 1:3.26 (-0.60,7.27)
Model 2: 2.64 (-1.23, 6.67)
Model 3: 2.38 (-0.89, 5.77)
6-day moving avg IQR: 0.44
Model 1:1.63 (-1.99, 5.38)
Model 2:1.03 (-2.62, 4.80)
Model 3: 0.93 (-2.15, 4.11)
7-day moving avg. IQR: 0.44
Model 1:1.38 (-2.45, 5.36)
Model 2: 0.69 (-3.16, 4.70)
Model 3: 0.45 (-2.81,3.83)
% change in tHcy per IQR increase in BC,
24-h avg
Among those with low folate: 5.31 (2.26,
8.42)
Among those with low B12: 5.06 (2.03,
8.17)
nearly null associations among those with
high levels
July 2009
E-49
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Park et al. (2008,156845)
Period of Study: Jan 1995—Jun 2005
Location: Greater Boston area, MA
Outcome: Total homocysteine (tHcy)
Mean Age: 73.6 ± 6.9 yrs
Study Design: Cross-sectional and
longitudinal analyses performed
N:960 men
Statistical Analyses: Generalized
additive models (also hierarchical mixed-
effects regression models to assess
repeated measures of tHcy)
Covariates: Model 1: season, age, long-
term trend, apparent temperature
Model 2: further adjustment for BMI, sys-
tolic blood pressure, smoking status, pack
years of cigarettes, alcohol consumption
Model 3: further adjustment for serum
creatinine, plasma folate, vitamin B6, and
vitamin B12
Dose-response Investigated? Modeled
continuous covariates as penalized splines
to determine if association with tHcy was
linear
Statistical Package: R software
Pollutant: 0C
Averaging Time: 24 h (moving averages
up to 7 days prior to blood collection)
Mean (SD): 3.5(1.8)
Median: 3.1
Range (Min, Max): 0.29,11.8
Monitoring Stations: 1 site
Copollutant (correlation): PM2.6
(r - 0.51)
BC (r - 0.51)
0C
SO42 (r - 0.41)
PM Increment: IQR
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Estimated % change in tHcy per IQR
increase in pollutant.
Lag model
Concurrent day. IQR: NA
Model 1: NA
Model 2: NA
Model 3: NA
1-day previous. IQR: 2.00
Model 1:2.12 (-0.98, 5.31)
Model 2:1.69 (-1.51,5.00)
Model 3:1.87 (-0.81,4.62)
2-day moving avg. IQR: 1.93
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
0.39 (-3.67, 3.01)
¦0.88 (-4.26, 2.61)
1.05 (-1.86, 4.06)
3-day moving avg. IQR: 1.68
Model 1:0.53 (-2.66, 3.83)
Model 2: 0.14 (-3.15, 3.54)
Model 3:1.32 (-1.44,4.16)
4-day moving avg. IQR: 1.64
Model 1:1.57 (-1.89, 5.15)
Model 2:1.42 (-2.14,5.12)
Model 3:1.89 (-1.15, 5.03)
5-day moving avg, IQR: 1.60
Model 1:2.27 (-1.49, 6.16)
Model 2: 2.11 (-1.77, 6.15)
Model 3: 2.12 (-1.29, 5.65)
6-day moving avg. IQR: 1.43
Model 1:2.83 (-0.74,6.52)
Model 2: 2.78 (-0.90, 6.60)
Model 3: 2.53 (-0.59, 5.74)
7-day moving avg. IQR: 1.23
Model 1:2.75 (-0.41, 6.02)
Model 2: 2.55 (-0.71,5.92)
Model 3: 2.55 (-0.21,5.39)
% change in tHcy per IQR increase in OC,
7-d avg.
Among those with low B12: 5.23 (1.59,
9.01)
nearly null associations among those with
high levels
July 2009
E-50
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Park et al. (2005, 057331)
Period of Study: November 2000-
October 2003
Location: Greater Boston area, MA
Outcome: Change in HRV (SDNN, HF, LF,
LFHFR)
Mean age: 72.7 years
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 497 adult males living in the Greater
Boston, MA area
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 4 h
24 h
48 h
Mean (SD): 11.4 (8.0)
Range: 6.45-62.9
Copollutant: 0:i, Particle number count,
BC, NO?, SO?, CO
PM Increment: 8 |Jgfm3
Percent change (95% CI): 48h mean
PM2.6: 20.8% decrease in HF (95% CI:
4.6%, 34.2%)
18.6% increase in LFHFR (4.1%, 35.2%).
Notes: Subjects were monitored during a
4-min rest period between 8 a.m. and 1
p.m. Modifying effects of hypertension,
IHD, diabetes, and use of cardiac/anti-
hypertensive medications also examined.
Linear regression analyses. This subject
group is from the VA Normative Aging
Study. The 4-h averaging period was most
strongly associated with HRV indices. The
PM effect was robust in models including
O3. The HRV change per IQR increase in
PM2.E were larger in subjects with
hypertension (n - 335) IHD (n - 142),
and diabetes (n - 72). In addition, those
who did not use calcium-channel blockers
had a greater decline in LF associated with
each IQR increase in PM2.6 than did those
who did use calcium channel blockers. IQR
increases in 48h mean BC concentration
were also associated with adverse
changes in HRV, suggesting traffic
pollution may be particularly toxic.
Reference: Park et al. (2006, 091245)
Period of Study: November 2000-
December 2004
Location: Greater Boston area, MA
Outcome: Change in HF
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: Statistical Analysis: Linear
regression models
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 48 h
Mean (SD): PM2.B: 11.7 (7.8)
Sulfates: 3.3 (3.3)
BC: 0.92 (0.46)
Copollutant: O3
PM Increment: 10 |Jgfm3
Percent change (95% CI): Wild-type HFE
genotype: 31.7% (95% CI: 10.3, 48.1)
Among those with either of the two HFE
variants, there was no association
between 48h PM2.6 and HF (shown in a
graph, —10% non-significant increase).
Notes: Normative Aging Study. Examining
association between PM and HF among
those with and without the wild-type HFE
genotype.
Reference: Pekkanen et al. (2002,
035050)
Period of Study: Winter 1998 to 1999
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Outcome: ST Segment Depression
(> 0.1 mV)
Study Design: Panel of ULTRA Study
participants
N: 45 Subjects, n - 342 biweekly
submaximal exercise tests, 72 exercise
induced ST Segment Depressions
Statistical Analysis: Logistic regression
I GAM
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Median: 10.6
IQR: 7.9
Pollutant: PMi
Median: 7.0
IQR: 5.6
Pollutant: ACP (100 to 1000nm) (n/cm3)
Median: 1200
IQR: 760
Copollutant: NO2, CO, PM 10 2.5, ultrafine
PM Increment: IQR
Effect Estimate(s): ACP: OR - 3.29
(1.57, 6.92), lag 2
PM1: OR - 4.56 (1.73,12.03), lag 2
PM2.6: OR - 2.84(1.42, 5.66), lag 2
Notes: The effect was strongest for ACP
and PM2.E, which in two pollutant models
appeared independent. Increases in NO2
and CO were also associated with
increased risk of ST segment depression,
but not with coarse particles.
July 2009 E-51 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Park et al. (2008,156845)
Period of Study: Jan 1995—Jun 2005
Location: Greater Boston area, MA
Outcome: Total homocysteine (tHcy)
Mean Age: 73.6 ± 6.9 yrs
Study Design: Cross-sectional and
longitudinal analyses performed
N: 960 men
Statistical Analyses: Generalized
additive models (also hierarchical mixed-
effects regression models to assess
repeated measures of tHcy)
Covariates: Model 1: season, age, long-
term trend, apparent temperature
Model 2: further adjustment for BMI,
systolic blood pressure, smoking status,
pack years of cigarettes, alcohol consump-
tion
Model 3: further adjustment for serum
creatinine, plasma folate, vitamin B6, and
vitamin B12
Dose-response Investigated? Modeled
continuous covariates as penalized splines
to determine if association with tHcy was
linear
Statistical Package: R software
Pollutant: S042
Averaging Time: 24 h (moving averages
up to 7 days prior to blood collection)
Mean (SD): 3.2 (3.0)
Median: 2.4
Range (Min, Max): 0.39, 29.0
Monitoring Stations: 1 site
Copollutant (correlation): PM2.6
(r - 0.85)
BC (r - 0.50)
0C (r - 0.41)
SO42-
PM Increment: IQR
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Estimated % change in tHcy per IQR
increase in pollutant.
Lag model
Concurrent day: IQR: NA
Model 1: NA
Model 2: NA
Model 3: NA
1 -day previous: IQR: 2.61
Model 1:0.91 (-0.77, 2.62)
Model 2: 0.99 (-0.94, 2.95)
Model 3: 0.91 (-0.72, 2.57)
2-day moving avg: IQR: 2.10
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
0.25 (-2.07,1.60)
¦0.29 (-2.35,1.82)
0.05 (-1.74,1.86)
3-day moving avg: IQR: 1.73
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
0.15(-1.97,1.69)
¦0.17 (-2.23,1.93)
¦0.01 (-1.78,1.80)
4-day moving avg: IQR: 1.64
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
¦0.69 (-2.74,1.41)
¦0.60 (-2.95,1.81)
¦0.58 (-2.63,1.51)
5-day moving avg: IQR: 1.60
Model 1:-1.14 (-3.53,1.30)
Model 2:-0.90 (-3.64,1.92)
Model 3:-1.09 (-3.48,1.36)
6-day moving avg;' IQR: 1.40
Model 1:0.00 (-2.39, 2.44)
Model 2: 0.36 (-2.36, 3.16)
Model 3: 0.41 (-2.01,2.89)
7-day moving avg
IQR: 1.30
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
¦0.16 (-2.51, 2.24)
0.30 (-2.37, 3.04)
0.07 (-2.25, 2.43)
Stratified analyses: No significant
difference in effect of S042- among those
with high and low levels of vitamins
Reference: Peters et al. (2005, 095747) Outcome: Myocardial infarction
Also Peters et al, 2005 (2005,156859)
Period of Study: February 1999-July
2001
Location: Augsburg, Germany
Study Design: Case-crossover
N: 691 myocardial infarction patients
Statistical Analysis: Conditional logistic
regression
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 1 h: Median - 14.5
IQR: 9.1
24-h: Median - 14.9
IQR: 7.7
Copollutant: NO2, SO2, CO
Effect Estimate: 2-h lag: OR - 0.93
95% CI: 0,83,1.04
24-h mean, 2-day lag: OR - 1.18
95% CI: 1.03,1.34
Notes: Examined triggering for Ml at
various lags before Ml onset (up to 6 h
before Ml, up to 5 days before Ml). PM2.6
levels 2 days before Ml onset were
associated with increased risk of Ml, but
not on the concurrent day, or lags 1, 3, 4,
or 5. These findings are consistent with
the prior Boston Ml study for a 1 - to 2-day
lagged effect of PM2.6.
July 2009
E-52
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Pope et al. (2004, 055238)
Period of Study: Winter 1999-2000 (in
Wasatch Front, UT). Summer 2000 (in
Hawthorne, UT).
Winter 2000-2001 (in Bountiful, UT and
Lindon, UT)
Location: Utah: Wasatch Front,
Hawthorne, Bountiful, and Lindon
Period of Study: 1994- 2004
Location: Wasatch Front, Utah
Reference: Pope et al. (2004, 055238)
Period of Study: 1999-2001
Location: Wasatch Front, Utah
Reference: Rich et al. (2005, 079620)
Period of Study: July 1995—July 2002
Location: Eastern Massachusetts, USA
Outcome: Change in autonomic function
(measured by changes in HRV), C-reactive
protein (CRP), blood cell counts, platelets,
and blood viscosity associated with short-
term changes in PM2.6
Age Groups: Elderly (specific age range
not given)
Study Design: Panel study
N: 88 elderly subjects
Statistical Analysis: Linear regression
Season: Winter, summer
Dose-response Investigated? No
Study Design: Case-crossover study
(time-stratified control selection)
N: Statistical Analysis: Conditional
logistic regression
Outcome: Heart rate variability (HRV)
C-reactive protein (CRP)
blood cell counts, whole blood viscosity
Age Groups: 54-89 yrs
Study Design: Panel study
N: 88 participants
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression
Covariates: Subject-specific fixed effects
interactive spline smooths for temp, RH
(partial control for H)
Season: Temperature as covariate
Dose-response Investigated?
Yes, also assessed PM by including cubic
smoothing splines with 3 df
Statistical Package: SAS
Outcome: Confirmed ventricular
arrhythmias
Study Design: Case-crossover (time-
stratified control selection)
N: 203 patients with implantable
cardioverter defibrillators
Statistical Analysis: Conditional logistic
regression
Pollutant: PM2.6 (TE0M)
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 18.9 (13.4)
Copollutant: None
Pollutant: PM2.6 (FRM)
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): Site 1:10.1
Site 2: 10.8
Site 3: 11.3
Monitoring Stations: 3
Copollutant: PM10 (FRM) measured at 4
monitoring sites
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 23.7 (20.2)
Range (Min, Max): 1.7, 74.0
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: None
Pollutant: PM2.6 (TE0M)
Averaging Time: 1-h avg
24-h avg
Median (IQR): 1-h avg: Median - 9.2
/yg/m3
24-h avg: Median - 9.8 //g|m3
IQr - 7.8
Copollutant: O3, BC, CO, NO2, SO2
PM Increment: 100/yg/m3
Effect Estimate: Each 100 |Jgfm3
increase associated with: -35 (SE - 8)
msec decline in SDNN
0.81 (SE 0.17) mg/dL increase in CRP
0.31 (SE 9.34) k///L increase in platelets
0.07 (SE 0.21) cP increase in blood
viscosity
Notes: The study observed small but
statistically significant adverse
associations between daily mean PM2.6
and HRV and C-reactive protein (CRP). The
authors point out, however, that most of
the variability in the temporal deviation of
these physiological endpoints was not
explained by PM2.6. These observations
therefore suggest that PM2.6 may be one
of multiple factors that influence HRV and
CRP.
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Effect Estimate: For same-day increase
in PM2.6: OR - 1.045
95% CI: 1.011,1.080
Notes: Case-crossover study (time-
stratified control selection) triggering of
acute ischemic heart disease by ambient
PM2.E concentrations on the same and
previous 3 days. PM2.6 measured at 3
sites and estimated for missing days.
Effect estimates were larger for those
with angiographically demonstrated
coronary artery disease.
PM Increment: 100/yg/m3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Regression coefficients (SE) for
associations with concurrent day
pollutant: Mean H: -4.49 (1.73)
SDNN: -34.94 (8.32)
SDANN:-18.98 (8.67)
r-MSSD:-42.25 (10.90)
CRP: 0.81 (0.18)
Whole blood viscosity: 0.07 (0.21)
WBC: -0.07 (0.38)
Granulocytes: 0.02 (0.37)
Lymphocytes: -0.07 (0.14)
Monocytes: 0.12 (0.04)
Basophils: -0.01 (0.01)
Eosinophils: -0.01 (0.02)
RBC: 0.03 (0.06)
Platelets: 0.31 (9.34)
PM Increment: 7.8/yg/m3
Effect Estimate: For mean PM2.6 in the
24 h before ventricular arrhythmia: OR
- 1.19
95% CI: 1.02,1.38
Notes: 794 ventricular arrhythmias
among 84 subjects.
Lag h: 0-2, 0-6, 0-23, 0-47
Reference: Pope et al. (2006, 091246) Outcome: Acute ischemic heart disease
July 2009
E-53
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Rich et al. (2006, 088427)
Period of Study: July 1995—July 2002
Location: Eastern Massachusetts, USA
Outcome: Confirmed episodes of
paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
Study Design: Case-crossover (time-
stratified control selection)
N: 203 patients with implantable
cardioverter defibrillators
Statistical Analysis: Conditional logistic
regression
Pollutant: PM2.6 (TE0M)
Averaging Time: 1 h avg
24-h avg
Median (IQR): 1-h avg: Median - 9.2
^g/m3
24-h avg: Median - 9.8 //g|m3
IQr - 7.8
Copollutant: O3, BC, CO, NO2, SO2
PM Increment: 9.4/yg/m3
Effect Estimate: O h lag: OR 1.41 (0.82,
2.42)
Notes: 91 paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
(PAF) episodes among 29 subjects.
Lag h: 0, 0 ¦ 23
Positive, but not significant increases in
the relative odds of PAF associated with
PM2.E concentrations in the same h and
24-h before PAF episode onset. Authors
note reduced statistical power for PM2.6
analyses due to missing data.
Reference: Rich et al. (2006, 088427)
Period of Study: July 1995—July 2002
Location: Eastern Massachusetts, USA
Outcome: Confirmed episodes of
paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
Study Design: Case-crossover (time-
stratified control selection)
N: 203 patients with implantable
cardioverter defibrillators
Statistical Analysis: Conditional logistic
regression
Pollutant: BC
Averaging Time: 1-h avg
24-h avg
Median (IQR): IQR: 0.91//gjm3
Copollutant: O3, PM2.6, CO, NO2, SO2
PM Increment: 0.91/yg/m3 (IQR)
Effect Estimate: 0- to 23-h lac
OR 1.46 (95% CI: 0.67, 3.17)'
Notes: 91 paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
(PAF) episodes among 29 subjects.
Lag h: 0, 0-23
Positive, but not significant increases in
the relative odds of PAF associated with
BC concentrations in the same h and 24 h
before PAF episode onset. Authors note
reduced statistical power for BC analyses
due to missing data.
Reference: Rich et al. (2006, 089814)
Period of Study: May 2001-December
2002
Location: St. Louis, M0 metropolitan area
Outcome: Confirmed ventricular
arrhythmia
Study Design: Case-crossover design
(time-stratified control selection)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: PM2.6 (CAMM)
Averaging Time: 24 h
Median (IQR): 16.2/yglm3 (IQr - 9.7)
Copollutant: NO2, SO2, CO, O3, EC, 0C
PM Increment: 9.7/yglm3 (IQR)
Effect Estimate: OR (PM2 b) - 0.95 (95%
CI: 0.72,1.27)
OR (SO2) - OR - 1.24(95% CI: 1.07,
1.44)
Notes: 139 confirmed ventricular
arrhythmia episodes among 56 subjects.
Lags: 0-2h, 0-6h, 0-11 h, 0-23h, 0-47h
Authors did not find increased relative
odds of VA associated with each IQR
increase in 24-h mean PM2.6, but did find
non-significantly increased relative odds of
VA associated with 24-h EC. Shorter and
longer lag times' relative odds estimates
provided no evidence of immediate
ventricular arrhythmic effects of air
pollution.
Reference: Rich et al. (2004, 055631)
Period of Study: February-December
2000
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia,
Canada
Outcome: ICD discharges (as a proxy for
VT/VF)
Age Groups: 15-85 years
Study Design: Case-crossover design
(ambidirectional control selection ± 7
days)
N: 34 patients with implantable
cardioverter defibrillators
Statistical Analysis: Conditional logistic
regression
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: PM2.6 (Partisol)
Averaging Time: 1 h
Mean (SD), IQR: Mean:: 8.2//gfm3
(SD - 10.7)
IQr - 5.2
PM Increment: Effect Estimate: Odds
ratios were less than 1.0 at all lags (0,1,
2, 3) for PM2.6.
No consistent association between any of
the air pollutants and implantable
cardioverter defibrillators discharges.
Copollutant: O3, EC, 0C, S0r , CO, NO2,
SO2, PM10
PM10: Mean:: 13.3/yg/m3
(SD - 4.9)
IQr - 7.4
Notes: Same study as Vedal et al. (2004,
055630), except Rich (2004) used data
from a shorter time period so as to
estimate relative odds of ICD discharge
associated with acute increases in more
pollutants than Vedal (2004, 055630).
July 2009
E-54
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Rich et al. (2008,156910)
Period of Study: NR
Location: New Jersey
Outcome: Pulmonary Artery and Right
Ventricular Pressures
Age Groups: 25-68
Study Design: panel
N: 11 subjects
Statistical Analyses:
Measures
Covariates: long-term trends, calendar
month, weekday, apparent temperature
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 0-6d
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean (SD): NR
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: NR
Co-pollutant Correlation
n/a
PM Increment: 11.62/yg/m3
Change (Lower CI, Upper CI), p-value:
ePAD: 0.19(0.05, 0.33), 0.01
RV diastolic pressure: 0.23 (0.11, 0.34),
<0.001
RV systolic pressure: 0.12 (-0.07, 0.31),
0.23
MPAP: 0.12 (-0.05, 0.28), 0.161
Reference: Riedikeret al. (2004,
091261)
Period of Study: Fall 2001
Location: Wake County, North Carolina
Outcome: Heart rate variability (measured
10 h after shift): mean cycle length of
normal R-R intervals (MCL), the standard
deviation of normal R-R intervals (SDNN),
and percentage of normal R-R interval
differences greater than 50 msec
(PNN50), low frequency (0.04-0.15Hz),
high frequency (0.15-0.40Hz), the ratio of
low to high frequency.
Blood analysis (measured 15 h after
shift): Uric acid, blood urea nitrogen,
gamma glutamyl transpeptidase, white
blood cell count, red blood cell count,
hematocrit, hemoglobin, mean red blood
cell volume (MCV), neutronphils (count and
%), lymphocytes (count and %), C-reactive
protein, plasminogen, plasminogen
activator inhibitor type 1, von Willebrand
factor (vWF), endovthzelin-1, protein C,
and interleukin-6
Pollutant: In-vehicle PM2.6 components
identified with factor analysis (crustal
material, wear of steel automotive
components, gasoline combustion, speed-
changing traffic with engine emissions and
brake wear
Age Groups: 23-30 yrs
Study Design: Panel
N: 9 healthy male troopers, repeated
measures (36 person-days)
Statistical Analyses: Mixed effects
regression models (principal factor
analysis for classification of exposure)
Covariates: Potential confounders:
temperature, relative humidity, number of
law-enforcement activities during the shift
and the avg speed during the shift
controlling had no effect on effect esti-
mates for "crustal" and "speed-change"
factors
however, confounder inclusion in the
"speed change" and blood urea nitrogen
and vWF reduced the effect estimate and
the CI included zero
Season: Only 1 season included
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: S-Plus 6.1
Averaging Time: Exposure
during 3pm to 12am work shifts
Mean: PM2.Bmass - 23.0/yg/m3
Monitoring Stations: Per vehicle
Copollutant (correlation): Correlation to
PM2.6Mass
Benzene: r - 0.50
Aldehydes: r - 0.34
CO: r - 0.52
Aluminum: r - 0.58
Silicon: r - 0.66
Sulfur: r - 0.58
Calcium: r - 0.37
Titanium: r - 0.41
Chromium: r - 0.51
Iron: r - 0.71
Copper: r - 0.16
Selenium: r - 0.38
Tungsten: r - 0.37
PM2.Lightscatter: r - 0.71
PM Increment: 1 SD change in source
factor
Effect Estimate: % change in the health
outcome per 1 SD change in the "speed
change"factor
MCL: 7%
HRV: 16%
supraventricular ectopic beats: 39%
% Neutrophils: 7%
% lymphocytes: -10%
red blood cell volume MCV: 1 %
vWF: 9%
blood urea nitrogen: 7%
protein C: -11%
% change in the health outcome per 1 SD
change in the "crustal" factor
MCL: 3% serum uric acid concentrations:
5%
Note: Results (including CIs) are reported
in figures 2 & 3.
July 2009
E-55
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Riojas-Rodriguez et al. (2006,
156913)
Period of Study: December 2001 —April
2002
Location: Mexico City metropolitan area
Outcome: Heart rate variability (5-minute
periods)
Study Design: Panel study
N: 30 patients from the outpatient clinic
of the National Institute of Cardiology of
Mexico, where each subject had existing
ischemic heart disease.
Statistical Analysis: Mixed models
Pollutant: PM2.B (nephelometry)
Averaging Time: 5 minutes
Mean (SD), Range: 46.8//gfm3
(SD - 1.82)
Range: 0-483 //g|m3
Copollutant: CO
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Effect Estimate: Each 20 //gfm3 increase
in 5 minute PM2.6 was associated with a: -
0.008 decrease in the ln(HF)(95% CI: ¦
0.015, 0.0004
Notes: Population of subjects with known
ischemic heart disease (25 men and 5
women who had at least 1 prior Ml [not in
last 6 months])
Each 10 /yglm3 increase in 5 minute mean
PM2.E was associated with non-
significantly decreased HF, and with
similar, but smaller changes in LF and VLF.
Reference: Romieu et al. (2005, 086297) Outcome: Heart rate variability (HF, LF,
VLF, PNN50, SDNN, r-MSSD)
Period of Study: 2000-2001
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Age Groups: > 60 years of age
Study Design: Double blind randomized
controlled trial
N: 50 elderly residents of a Mexico City
nursing home
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Copollutant: O3, NO2, SO2, PM10
PM Increment: 8 /yglm3
Effect Estimate: In the group receiving
the fish oil supplement, each 8 //gf'nv1
change in 24 h mean total exposure PM2.6
was associated with a: a) 54% reduction
(95% CI:-72% to-24%) in HF (log
transformed) in the pre-supplementation
phase
b) 7% reduction (95% CI: -20%, 7%) in the
supplementation phase.
Changes in other HRV parameters were
also smaller in the supplementation phase.
In the group receiving soy oil
supplementation, the % reduction in HF
was also smaller in the supplementation
phase, but the differences were smaller
and not statistically significant.
Notes: Study of the effect of omega-3-
fatty acid supplementation (2 g/day of fish
oil versus 2 g/day of soy oil) to mitigate
the effect of ambient PM2.6 on HRV.
Subjects had no cardiac arrhythmias,
cardiac pacemakers, allergies to omega-3
fatty acids or fish, treatment with oral
anticoagulants, or history of bleeding
diathesis. PM2.6 was measured and
estimated indoors, outdoors, and with
regards to total exposure (the same as
Holguin et al. (2003)).
July 2009
E-56
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Romieu et al. (2008,156922) Outcome: Copper/zinc superoxide
dismutase activity (Cu/Zn SOD)
Period of Study: Sep 2001-Apr 2002
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
lipoperoxidation (LPO)
reduced glutathione (GSH)
Age Groups: 60-96 yrs
Study Design: Intervention (randomly
assigned fish oil or soy oil)
N: 52 participants
Statistical Analyses: Linear mixed
models
Covariates: Time
Dose-response Investigated? Assessed
possible nonlinearity using generalized
additive mixed models with p-splines
Statistical Package: STATA v8.2 and
SAS v9.1
Pollutant: PM2.6 (indoor)
Averaging Time: 24 h (same day)
Mean (SD): 38.7(14.7)
Percentiles: 25th: 30.62
50th: 35.11
75th: 41.10
Range (Min, Max): 14.8, 70.9
Monitoring Stations: Indoor measured
inside nursing home
Copollutant: 0:i
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Regression coefficient (SE
p-value):
Cu/Zn SOD: -0.05 (0.02
0.001)
LPO (square root transformed): 0.08 (0.09
0.381)
GSH (log-transformed
quadratic term for PM): -0.05 (0.01
0.002)
Regression coefficient (SE
p-value) by supplementation groups (same
transformations as above): Cu/Zn SOD
Soy Oil:-0.06 (0.02, <0.001)
Fish Oil: * 0.04 (0.02, 0.009)
LPO
Soy Oil:-0.02 (0.14,0.904)
Fish Oil: * 0.16 (0.07, 0.024)
GSH
Soy Oil: -0.03 (0.04, 0.406)
Fish Oil:-0.09 (0.04, 0.017)
"Quadratic term for PM
Reference: Ruckerl et al. (2007,156931) Outcome: lnterleukin-6 (IL-6), fibrinogen,
C-reactive protein (CRP)
Period of Study: May 2003—Jul 2004
Location: Athens, Augsburg, Barcelona,
Helsinki, Rome, and Stockholm
Age Groups: 35-80 yrs
Study Design: Repeated measures I
longitudinal
N: 1003 Ml survivors
Statistical Analyses: Mixed-effect
models
Covariates: City-specific confounders
(age, sex, BMI)
long-term time trend and apparent
temperature
RH, time of day, day of week included if
adjustment improved model fit
Season: Long-term time trend
Dose-response Investigated? Used p-
splines to allow for nonparametric
exposure-response functions
Statistical Package: SAS v9.1
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: Hourly and 24-h (lag 0-
4, mean of lags 0-4, mean of lags 0-1,
mean of lags2-3, means of lags 0-3)
Mean (SD): Presented by city only
Monitoring Stations: Central monitoring
sites in each city
Copollutant: SO2
03
NO
NO?
PM Increment: IQR
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
change in mean blood markers per
increase in IQR of air pollutant.
IL-6
Lag (IQR): % change in GM (95%CI)
Lag 0(11.0): 0.46 (-0.89,1.83)
Lag 1 (11.0):-0.39 (-1.69, 0.93)
Lag 2 (11.0):-0.23 (-1.53,1.07)
5-davg (8.6): 0.05 (-1.37,1.50)
Fibrinogen
Lag (IQR): % change in AM (95%CI)
Lag 0(11.0): 0.05 (-0.48, 0.58)
Lag 1 (11.0): 0.17 (-0.35, 0.69)
Lag 2 (11.0): 0.20 (-0.32, 0.71)
5-davg (8.6): 0.38 (-0.21, 0.96)
CRP
Lag (IQR): % change in GM (95%CI)
Lag 0(11.0): 0.11 (-1.95, 2.21)
Lag 1 (11.0):-0.06 (-1.98,1.90)
Lag 2 (11.0): 0.11 (-1.80, 2.06)
5-davg (8.6):-0.13 (-2.15,1.92)
July 2009
E-57
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ruckerl et al. (2006, 088754)
Period of Study: Oct 2000—Apr 2001
Location: Erfurt, Germany
Age Groups: 50 +
Study Design: Panel (12 repeated
measures at 2-wk intervals)
N: 57 male subjects with coronary disease
Statistical Analyses: Fixed effects linear
and logistic regression models
Covariates: Models adjusted for different
factors based on health endpoint
CRP: RH, temperature, trend, ID
ICAM-1: temperature, trend, ID
vWF: air pressure, RH, temperature, trend,
ID
FVII: air pressure, RH, temperature, trend,
ID,weekday
Season: Time trend as covariate
Dose-response Investigated? Sensitivity
analyses examined nonlinear exposure-
response functions
Statistical Package: SAS v8.2 and S-
Plus v6.0
Outcome: C-reactive protein (CRP)
serum amyloid A (SAA)
E-se lectin
von Willebrand Factor (vWF)
intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1)
fibrinogen
Factor VII
prothrombin fragment 1 +2
D-dimer
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 20.0(15.0)
Percentiles: 2th5: 9.7
50th: 14.9
75th: 26.1
Range (Min, Max): 2.6, 83.7
Monitoring Stations: 1 site
Copollutant: UFPs (ultrafine particles)
AP (accumulation mode particles)
PM2.6
PM10
0C (organic carbon)
EC (elemental carbon)
NO?
CO
PM Increment: IQR (16.4
5-davg: 12.2)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Effects of air pollution on blood markers
presented as OR (95%CI) for an increase
in the blood marker above the 90th
percentile per increase in IQR air pollutant.
CRP
Time before draw: 0 to 23 h: 1.1 (0.7,
1.8)
24 to 47 h: 1.5(0.9, 2.5)
48 to 71 h: 1.2(0.8,1.9)
5-d mean: 1.4(0.9, 2.3)
ICAM-1
Time before draw: 0 to 23 h: 0.7 (0.4,
0.9)
24 to 47 h: 1.3 (0.8,1.8)
48 to 71 h: 1.8(1.2, 2.7)
5-d mean: 1.1 (0.8, 1.5)
Effects of air pollution on blood markers
presented as % change from the meanfGM
in the blood marker per increase in IQR air
pollutant.
vWF
Time before draw: 0 to 23 h: 3.9 (-0.3,
8.1)
24 to 47 h: 3.1 (-1.6,7.8)
48 to 71 h: 3.6 (-1.1, 8.3)
5-d mean: 5.6 (0.5,10.8)
FVII
Time before draw: 0 to 23 h: -2.5 (-6.2,
1.4)
24 to 47 h:-2.8 (-6.1, 0.6)
48 to 71 h: -2.3 (-5.0, 0.6)
5-d mean: -3.5 (-6.4 to -0.4)
Note: Summary of results presented in
figures. SAA results indicate increase in
association with PM (not as strong and
consistent as with CRP)
no association observed between E-
selectin and PM
an increase in prothrombin fragment 1 +2
was consistently observed, particularly
with lag 4
fibrinogen results revealed few significant
associations, potentially due to chance
D-dimer results revealed null associations
in linear and logistic analyses
July 2009
E-58
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ruckerl et al. (2006, 088754)
Period of Study: Oct 2000—Apr 2001
Location: Erfurt, Germany
Age Groups: 50+ yrs
Study Design: Panel (12 repeated
measures at 2-wk intervals)
N: 57 male subjects with coronary disease
Statistical Analyses: Fixed effects linear
and logistic regression models
Covariates: Models adjusted for different
factors based on health endpoint
CRP: RH, temperature, trend, ID
ICAM-1: temperature, trend, ID
vWF: air pressure, RH, temperature, trend,
ID
FVII: air pressure, RH, temperature, trend,
ID,weekday
Season: Time trend as covariate
Dose-response Investigated? Sensitivity
analyses examined nonlinear exposure-
response functions
Statistical Package: SAS v8.2 and S-
Plus v6.0
Outcome: C-reactive protein (CRP)
serum amyloid A (SAA)
E-se lectin
von Willebrand Factor (vWF)
intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1)
fibrinogen
Factor VII
prothrombin fragment 1 +2
D-dimer
Pollutant: EC
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 2.6 (2.4)
Percentiles: 25th: 1.0
50th: 1.8
75th: 3.2
Range (Min, Max): 0.2,12.4
Monitoring Stations: 1 site
Copollutant: UFPs (ultrafine particles)
AP (accumulation mode particles)
PM2.6
PM10
0C (organic carbon)
EC (elemental carbon)
NO?
CO
PM Increment: IQR (2.3
5-d avg: 1.8)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Effects of air pollution on blood markers
presented as OR (95%CI) for an increase
in the blood marker above the 90th
percentile per increase in IQR air pollutant.
CRP
Time before draw: 0 to 23 h: 1.2 (0.7,
2.0)
24 to 47 h: 1.3(0.7, 2.4)
48 to 71 h: 1.6(0.9,2.7)
5-d mean: 1.2(0.7,2.1)
ICAM-1
Time before draw: 0 to 23 h: 1.0 (0.7,
1.6)
24 to 47 h: 2.6(1.7,3.8)
48 to 71 h: 4.0 (2.5, 6.1)
5-d mean: 2.2 (1.4, 3.3)
Effects of air pollution on blood markers
presented as % change from the meanfGM
in the blood marker per increase in IQR air
pollutant.
vWF
Time before draw: 0 to 23 h: 5.0 (0.0,
10.1)
24 to 47 h: 7.6 (1.4,13.7)
48 to 71 h: 1.1 (-5.2,7.4)
5-d mean: 5.7 ( 0.5,12.0)
FVII
Time before draw: 0 to 23 h: -5.7 (-10.5
to -0.7)
24 to 47 h: -6.9 (-11.2 to -2.3)
48 to 71 h: -4.2 (-8.4, 0.2)
5-d mean: -6.0 (-10.5 to -1.2)
Note: Summary of results presented in
figures. SAA results indicate increase in
association with PM (not as strong and
consistent as with CRP)
no association observed between E-
selectin and PM
an increase in prothrombin fragment 1 +2
was consistently observed, particularly
with lag 4
fibrinogen results revealed few significant
associations, potentially due to chance
D-dimer results revealed null associations
in linear and logistic analyses
July 2009
E-59
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ruckerl et al. (2006, 088754) Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10): C-reactive
Period of Study: Oct 2000—Apr 2001 protein (CRP)
Location: Erfurt, Germany serum amyloid A (SAA)
E-se lectin
von Willebrand Factor (vWF)
intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1)
fibrinogen
Factor VII
prothrombin fragment 1 +2
Ddimer
Age Groups: 50+ yrs
Study Design: Panel (12 repeated
measures at 2-wk intervals)
N: 57 male subjects with coronary disease
Statistical Analyses: Fixed effects linear
and logistic regression models
Covariates: Models adjusted for different
factors based on health endpoint
CRP: RH, temperature, trend, ID
ICAM-1: temperature, trend, ID
vWF: air pressure, RH, temperature, trend,
ID
FVII: air pressure, RH, temperature, trend,
ID,weekday
Season: Time trend as covariate
Dose-response Investigated? Sensitivity
analyses examined nonlinear exposure-
response functions
Statistical Package: SAS v8.2 and S-
Plus v6.0
Pollutant: OC
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 1.5 (0.6)
Percentiles: 25th: 1.1
50th: 1.4
75th: 1.8
Range (Min, Max): 0.3, 3.4
Monitoring Stations: 1 site
Copollutant: UFPs (ultrafine particles)
AP (accumulation mode particles)
PM2.6
PM10
0C (organic carbon)
EC (elemental carbon)
NO?
CO
PM Increment: IQR (0.7
5-d avg: 0.5)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Effects of air pollution on blood markers
presented as OR (95%CI) for an increase
in the blood marker above the 90th
percentile per increase in IQR air pollutant.
CRP
Time before draw: 0 to 23 h: 1.2 (0.7,
1.9)
24 to 47 h: 1.3(0.8, 2.1)
48 to 71 h: 1.4(0.8,2.4)
5-d mean: 1.2 (0.7,1.8)
ICAM-1
Time before draw: 0 to 23 h: 0.9 (0.6,
1.3)
24 to 47 h: 2.0(1.3,3.2)
48 to 71 h: 3.0(1.8,4.8)
5-d mean: 1.3 (0.8, 2.0)
Effects of air pollution on blood markers
presented as % change from the meanfGM
in the blood marker per increase in IQR air
pollutant.
vWF
Time before draw: 0 to 23 h: 5.5 (0.2,
10.8)
24 to 47 h: 8.0 (2.1,13.9)
48 to 71 h: 3.5 (-2.6, 9.6)
5-d mean: 7.4(2.0,12.8)
FVII
Time before draw: 0 to 23 h: -6.1 (-10.6
to -1.4)
24 to 47 h: -7.2 (-11.4 to -2.8)
48 to 71 h:-3.8 (-8.2, 0.9)
5-d mean: -5.6 (-9.8 to-1.1)
Note: Summary of results presented in
figures. SAA results indicate increase in
association with PM (not as strong and
consistent as with CRP)
no association observed between E-
selectin and PM
an increase in prothrombin fragment 1 +2
was consistently observed, particularly
with lag 4
fibrinogen results revealed few significant
associations, potentially due to chance
D dimer results revealed null associations
in linear and logistic analyses
July 2009
E-60
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ruckerl et al. (2007, 091379) Outcome: Soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L),
platelets, leukocytes, erythrocytes,
Period of Study: Oct 2000—Apr 2001
Location: Erfurt, Germany
hemoglobin
Age Groups: 50+ yrs
Study Design: Panel (12
measures at 2-wk intervals)
N: 57 male subjects with coronary disease
Statistical Analyses: Fixed effects linear
regression models
Covariates: Long-term time trend,
weekday of the visit, temperature, RH,
barometric pressure
Season: Time trend as covariate
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS v8.2 and S-
Plus v6.0
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 20.0(15.0)
Percentiles: 25th: 9.7
50th: 14.9
75th: 26.1
Range (Min, Max): 2.6, 83.7
Monitoring Stations: 1 site
Copollutants: UFPs (ultrafine particles)
AP (accumulation mode
particles)
PM2.6
PM10
NO
PM Increment: IQR (16.4
5-davg: 12.2)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Effects of air pollution on blood markers
presented as % change from the meanfGM
in the blood marker per increase in IQR air
pollutant.
sCD40L, % change GM (pg/mL)
lagO: 1.5 (-4.0, 7.3)
Lag1: 0.2 (-5.4, 6.2)
Lag2: -2.6 (-8.0, 3.1)
Lag3: 0.5 (-3.9, 5.0)
5-d mean: 0.2 (-5.4, 6.2)
Platelets, % change mean (103/|Jl)
LagO:-0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Lag1:0.1 (-1.3,1.5)
Lag2: 0.5 (-0.9,1.9)
Lag3: 0.2 (-1.1,1.5)
5-d mean: -0.4 (-1.9,1.2)
Leukocytes, % change in mean (103/|Jl)
LagO:-1.6 (-3.2, 0.0)
Lag1:-0.4 (-2.2,1.4)
Lag2:-0.2 (-2.1,1.7)
Lag3: -0.8 (-2.4, 0.7)
5-d mean: -1.6 (-3.5, 0.3)
Erythrocytes, % change mean (10E/|Jl)
LagO:-0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
Lag1:-0.3 (-0.7, 0.2)
Lag2: -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Lag3:-0.2 (-0.5, 0.1)
5-d mean: -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Hemoglobin, % change mean (g/dl)
LagO: 0.0 (-0.6, 0.5)
Lag1:-0.2 (-0.8, 0.3)
Lag2:-0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Lag3:-0.2 (-0.7, 0.2)
5-d mean: -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Reference: Sarnat et al. (2006, 090489) Outcome: Supraventricular ectopy (SVE)
or ventricular ectopy (VE)
Period of Study: summer and Autumn
2000
Location: Steubenville, OH
N: 32 nonsmoking older adults
Statistical Analysis: Logistic mixed
effects regression
Season: Summer, Autumn
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 5 days
Median (IQR): PM2.6: Median: 19.0//gfm3
IQr - 10.0
Sulfate: Median: 6.1. IQR: 4.2
EC: Median: 0.9. IQR: 0.5
Copollutants: O3, NO2, SO2
PM Increment: IQR
Effect Estimate: PM21,: SVE: OR - 1.42
(95% CI: 0.99, 2.04)
VE: OR - 1.02 (95% CI: 0.63-1.65)
Sulfate: SVE: OR - 1.70(95% CI: 1.12,
2.57)
VE: OR - 1.08(95% CI: 0.65,1.80)
EC: SVE: OR - 1.15 (95% CI: 0.73,1.81)
VE: OR - 1.00(95% CI: 0.57,1.75)
Notes: Longitudinal study of 32
nonsmoking older adults who had ECG
measurements made every week for 24
weeks. PM measured within 1 mile of
subjects' residences, and central site
pollutant measurements were also made.
July 2009
E-61
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Schneider et al. (2008,
191985)
Outcome: Endothelial Function
Parameters
Period of Study: Nov 2004 - Dec 2005 Age Groups: 48-80 yrs
Location: Chapel Hill, NC Study Design: panel
N: 22 diabetics
Statistical Analyses: Mixed Models
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: daily
Mean (SD): 13.6 (7.0)
Min: 2.0
Max: 38.9
Monitoring Stations: 2
Covariates: season, day of the week,
temperature, relative humidity, barometric Copollutant: NR
pressure
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 0-4d & 5d ma
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Percent Change: (Lower CI, Upper CI),
lag:
FMD: *\
¦17.3 (-34.6, 0.0), lagO
¦4.4 (-24.6,15.8), lag 1
¦18.6(44.8,7.6), lag 2
1.6 (-23.6, 26.9), lag 3
18.4(-3.5, 40.3), lag 4
-19.4 (-62.6, 23.8), 5d ma
NTGMD:
2.5(-9.0,13.9), lagO
¦13.6 (-24.5,-2.6), lag 1*
-10.2 (-23.5, 3.0), lag 2
¦8.0 (-22.4, 6.4), lag 3
3.6 (-7.9,15.0), lag 4
-19.4 (-44.3, 5.5), 5d ma
LAEI:
0.4 (-4.2, 5.0), lag 0
¦0.3 (-6.0, 5.4), lag 1
2.5 (-4.3, 9.4), lag 2
¦7.3 (-13.5,-1.1), lag 3*
¦2.3 (-8.0, 3.3), lag 4
-4.6 (-15.3, 6.1), 5d ma
SAEI:
¦3.0 (-13.0, 7.0), lag 0
¦17.0 (-27.5,-6.4), lag 1**
-9.7 (-23.5,4.2), lag 2
¦15.1 (-29.3,-0.9)*, lag 3
¦2.1 (-14.0, 9.7), lag 4
¦25.4 (-45.4,-5.3), 5d ma*
SVR:
¦1.6 (-3.7, 0.4), lagO
1.6(-0.9, 4.1), lag 1
3.5 (0.5, 6.5), lag 2
2.4 (-0.5, 5.3), lag 3
3.2 (0.7, 5.6), lag 4*
4.5 (-0.3, 9.2), 5d ma
*p< 0.05, " p < 0.01
Notes: Percent change (95%CI) per
10/yg/m3 PM2.6by GSTM1 genotype
(figure 3)
July 2009
E-62
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Schwartz et al. (2005,
074317)
Period of Study: 12 weeks during the
summer of 1999
Location: Boston, MA
Outcome: Heart rate variability (HRV),
((SDNN,
r-MSSD, PNN50, LFHFR)
Age Groups: 61-89 years
Study Design: Panel study
N: 28 elderly subjects
Statistical Analysis: Mixed models. To
examine heterogeneity of effects,
hierarchical modeling was used.
Season: Summer
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: PM2.B
Averaging Time: 1 h
24 h
Median: 24-hs: 10 |Jgfm3
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant: BC, 0:i, CO, SO2, NO2
PM Increment: IQR (not given)
Effect Estimate: 24 h: 2.6 ms decrease
in SDNN (95% CI: 0.8 to-6.0)
10.1 ms decrease in r-MSSD (95% CI: ¦
2.8 to-16.9).
1 h: 3.4 ms decrease in SDNN (95% CI:
0.6 to-7.3)
7.4 ms decrease in r-MSSD (95% CI: 1.6
to-15.5).
Notes: Various log-transformed HRV
parameters were measured for 30 minutes
once a week. The random effects model
indicated that the negative effect of BC
on HRV was not restricted to a few
subjects.
Same study population as Gold et al.
(2005). Boston Elders Study
For each pollutant/averaging time,
similarly sized changes were observed for
PNN50 (%) and LFHFR.
Reference: Schwartz et al. (2005,
074317)
Period of Study: 12 weeks during the
summer of 1999
Location: Boston, MA
Outcome: Heart rate variability (HRV),
((SDNN, r-MSSD, PNN50, LFHFR)
Age Groups: 61-89 years
Study Design: Panel study
N: 28 elderly subjects
Statistical Analysis: Mixed models. To
examine heterogeneity of effects,
hierarchical modeling was used.
Season: Summer
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: BC
Averaging Time: 24 h
Median: 1.0 |jg/m3
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant: PM2.6, O3, CO, SO2, NO2
PM Increment: IQR
Effect Estimate: 5.1 ms decrease in
SDNN (-1.5 to-8.6)
10.1 ms decrease in r-MSSD (-2.4 to ¦
17.2).
Notes: Various log-transformed HRV
parameters were measured for 30 minutes
once a week. The random effects model
indicated that the negative effect of BC
on HRV was not restricted to a few
subjects. Same study population as Gold
et al. (2005). Boston Elders Study.
Subjects with a prior Ml experienced
greater declines in BC associated HRV. For
each pollutant/averaging time, similarly
sized changes were observed for PNN50
(%) and LFHFR.
Reference: Schwartz et al. (2005,
074317)
Period of Study: 2000
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Outcome: HF (high frequency component Pollutant: PM2.6
of heart rate variability)
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 497 subjects
Statistical Analysis: Linear regression,
controlling for covariates
Averaging Time: 48 h
Mean (SD): 11.4/yg/m3 (8.0)
Copollutant: None
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Effect Estimate: 34% decrease in HF
(95% CI: -9% to -52%) in subjects without
the GSTM1 allele. In subjects with the
allele, no effect was noted. Similar
findings for obese subjects and those with
high neutrophil counts.
Notes: Study population: Normative Aging
Study.
Effects of PM2.E appear to be mediated by
R0S.
July 2009
E-63
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Sorensen et al. (2005,
089428)
Period of Study: Nov 1999-Aug 2000
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Outcome: 7-Hydro-8-Oxo-2'-
Deoxyguanosine (8-oxodG) (measured in
lymphocytes and urine)
Age Groups: 20-33 yrs
Study Design: Panel (repeated measures)
N: 49 students living and studying in
central Copenhagen
50 students examined each season (66
subjects total
32 participated in each season
total of 98 measurements)
Statistical Analyses: Mixed models
repeated measures
Covariates: PM2.6, season, subject
(random factor)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS v8e
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 48 h
Mean (SD): Autumn: 20.7
Summer: 12.6
Percentiles: IQR Autumn: 13.1-27.7
IQR summer: 9.4-24.3
Range (Min, Max): NR
Monitoring Stations: NA (personal
assessment)
Copollutant (correlation): Spearman
correlations with PM2.6 mass: chromium
(r - 0.22)
copper (r - 0.33)
iron (r - 0.29)
vanadium (p > 0.5)
nickel (p > 0.5)
platinum (p > 0.5)
PM Increment: see below
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Association between 8-oxodG in
lymphocytes and personal exposure to
transition metals in PM2.6.
% increase in 8-oxodG per increase in
metal concentration indicated
Vanadium: 1.9% per 1 |jg/L (0.6, 3.3)
Chromium: 2.2% per 1 |jg/L (0.8, 3.5)
Platinum: 6.1 % per 1 ng/L (-0.6,13.2)
Nickel: 0.8% per 10 (Jg/L (-2.1, 3.7)
Copper: -0.8% per 10 |jg/L (-2.7,1.0)
Iron: 0.6% per 10 |jg/L (-1.4, 2.6)
Note: PM2.B mass was independently
associated with 8-oxodG in 5 of 6
transition metal models (p < 0.02 in
models with vanadium, chromium, nickel,
copper, and iron
p - 0.07 in platinum model). No transition
metals were associated with 8-oxodG
measured in urine
Reference: Sorensen et al. (2003,
042700)
Period of Study: Nov 1999-Aug 2000
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Outcome: RBC count, hemoglobin,
platelet count, fibrinogen, PLAAS (2-
aminoadipic semialdehyde in plasma
proteins), HBGGS (~-glutamyl
semialdehyde in hemoglobin), HBAAS (2-
aminoadipic semialdehyde in hemoglobin),
MDA (malondialdehyde)
Age Groups: 20-33 yrs
Study Design: Panel (repeated measures)
N: 50 students living and studying in
central Copenhagen
50 students examined each season (68
subjects total
31 participated in each season
total of 195 measurements)
Statistical Analyses: Mixed model
repeated-measures analysis
Covariates: Season, avg outdoor
temperature, and sex
Season: Repeated measures 4 times
(once per season)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS v8e
Pollutant: PM2.6 (personal)
Averaging Time: 48 h
Median: 16.1 |Jgfm3
Percentiles: Q25-Q75: 10.0-24.5
Copollutant: Urban background PM2.6
Personal PM2.6
PM Increment: 1 /yglm3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Relationship between exposure and
biomarkers
Estimate (p-value): Platelet count (x 10e/g
protein): 0.0008 (0.37)
Fibrinogen (nmol/g protein): 0.0006 (0.69)
PLAAS (pmol/mg protein): 0.0016 (0.061)
HBGGS (pmol/mg protein): 0.0001 (0.94)
HBAAS (pmol/mg protein): 0.0006 (0.64)
Increase (95%CI) in biomarkers per 10
|jg/m3 increase in PM2.5
RBC
Men: 0% (-1.6,1.6)
Women: 2.3% (0.5, 4.1)
Hemoglobin
Men: 0.0% (-1.7,1.5)
Women: 2.6% (0.8, 4.5)
July 2009
E-64
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Sorensen et al. (2003,
042700)
Period of Study: Nov 1999-Aug 2000
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Outcome: RBC count, hemoglobin,
platelet count, fibrinogen, PLAAS (2-
aminoadipic semialdehyde in plasma pro-
teins), HBGGS (~ glutamyl semialdehyde in
hemoglobin), HBAAS (2-aminoadipic semi-
aldehyde in hemoglobin), MDA
(malondialdehyde)
Age Groups: 20-33 yrs
Study Design: Panel (repeated measures)
N: 50 students living and studying in
central Copenhagen
50 students examined each season (68
subjects total
31 participated in each season
total of 195 measurements)
Statistical Analyses: Mixed model
repeated-measures analysis
Covariates: Season, avg outdoor
temperature, and sex
Season: Repeated measures 4 times
(once per season)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS v8e
Pollutant: Personal exposure to black
carbon (10 6/m)
Averaging Time: 48 h
Median: 8.1
Percentiles: Q25-Q75: 5.0-13.2
Copollutant:
Urban background PM2.6
Personal PM2.6
PM Increment: 10 6/m
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Relationship between exposure and
biomarkers
Estimate (p-value): RBC count (x 10B/g
protein): 0.0003 (0.75)
Hemoglobin (|Jmolfg protein): 0.0004
(0.65)
Platelet count (x 106/g protein): 0.0009
(0.51)
Fibrinogen (nmol/g protein): -0.0027 (0.29)
PLAAS (pmol/mg protein): 0.0041
(0.0009)
HBGGS (pmol/mg protein): 0.0024 (0.25)
HBAAS (pmol/mg protein): 0.0022 (0.20)
MDA (pmol/mg protein): 0.0018 (0.30)
Reference: Sorensen et al. (2003,
042700)
Period of Study: Nov 1999-Aug 2000
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Outcome: RBC count, hemoglobin,
platelet count, fibrinogen, PLAAS (2-
aminoadipic semialdehyde in plasma pro-
teins), HBGGS (~-glutamyl semialdehyde in
hemoglobin), HBAAS (2-aminoadipic semi-
aldehyde in hemoglobin), MDA
(malondialdehyde)
Age Groups: 20-33 yrs
Study Design: Panel (repeated measures)
N: 50 students living and studying in
central Copenhagen
50 students examined each season (68
subjects total
31 participated in each season
total of 195 measurements)
Statistical Analyses: Mixed model
repeated-measures analysis
Covariates: Season, avg outdoor
temperature, and sex
Season: Repeated measures 4 times
(once per season)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS v8e
Pollutant: PM2.6 (urban background
concentration)
Averaging Time: 48 h
Median: 9.2 |Jg/m3
Percentiles: Q25-Q75: 5.3-14.8
Copollutant: Urban background PM2.6
Personal carbon black
PM Increment: 1 /yg/m3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Relationship between exposure and
biomarkers
Estimate (p-value): RBC count (x 10B/g
protein): 0.0008 (0.36)
Hemoglobin (|Jmol/g protein): 0.0005
(0.53)
Platelet count (x 10e/g protein): -0.0008
(0.49)
Fibrinogen (nmol/g protein): 0.0004 (0.84)
PLAAS (pmol/mg protein): 0.0004 (0.76)
HBGGS (pmol/mg protein): -0.0020 (0.39)
HBAAS (pmol/mg protein): -0.0021 (0.29)
MDA (pmol/mg protein): 0.0012 (0.52)
July 2009
E-65
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Sullivan et al. (2007,100083) Outcome: Blood CRP, fibrinogen, Ddimer Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Study Design: Panel study Median (IQR): 7.7//gfm3 (6.4)
N: 47 elderly subjects Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant: Indoor PM2.6
Period of Study: February 2000-March Age Groups: > 55 years of
2002
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Effect Estimate: Among those with CVD,
PM2.61 day earlier: CRP: 1.25 (95% CI:
0.97,1.58)
Fibrinogen: 1.01 (95% CI: 0.97,1.05)
Ddimer: 1.04 (95% CI: 0.93,1.15)
With C0PD: CRP: 0.69 (95% CI: 0.34,
1.42)
Fibrinogen: 1.05 (95% CI: 0.97,1.13)
D-dimer: 1.10 (95% CI: 0.95,1.28)
Healthy: CRP: 1.01 (95% CI: 0.85,1.19)
Fibrinogen: 0.88 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.95)
D-dimer: 1.10 (95% CI: 0.75,1.58)
Notes: Out of 47 subjects, n - 23 with
CVD and n - 24 (n - 16 C0PD and 8
healthy) without CVD. Blood markers were
measured on 2-3 morning over a 5-10 day
period, and outdoor PM2.6 was measured
at a central monitoring site.
These findings are not consistent with and
effect of fine PM on markers of
inflammation and thrombosis in the
elderly.
Reference: Sullivan et al. (2005,109418)
Outcome: Heart rate variability (H, LF,
Pollutant: PM2.6
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
HF, r-MSSD, SDNN)
Period of Study: February 2000-March
Averaging Time: 1 h
Effect Estimate: 1 h:
2002
Study Design: Panel study
With CVD: HF: (3% increase, 95% CI: -19,
Median (IQR): 10.7 (7.6)
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
N: 34 elderly subjects with (n - 21) and
Copollutant: CO, NO2
32)
without (n - 13) CVD.
Without CVD: HF(5% decrease, 95% CI: ¦
Statistical Analysis: Linear mixed
34, 36)
effects regression
Similarly, no association was found for 4-
h or 24-h mean PM2.6 concentrations.
Notes: 285 daily 20 minute HRV
measures were made in the homes of
study subjects over a 10-day period.
Reference: Sullivan et al. (2005,109418) Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10): High-
sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)
Period of Study: February 2000-March
2002
Location: Seattle area, WA
fibrinogen
Ddimer
endothelin-1 (ET-1)
interleukin-6 (IL-6
interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6r)
tumor necrosis factor-n (TNF-8- ~)
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
(0-day and 1-day lags)
Mean (SD): NR
Percentiles: For all subject-days: 25th:
5.2
50th: 7.7
75th: 11.5
tumor necrosis factor-receptors (p55, p75) 90th: 19.9
Range (Min, Max): 1.3, 33.9
monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
(MCP-1)
Age Groups: a 55 yrs
Study Design: Panel
Monitoring Stations: NA, measured at
participant's residence
measures) Copollutant: None
N: 47 participants with (23) and without
(10C0PD and 8 healthy) CVD
Statistical Analyses: Mixed models
Covariates: Age, gender, medication use,
meteorological variables (temperature and
RH)
Dose-response Investigated? No
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Multiplicative change in mean outcome
associated with 10 //g|m3 increase in PM
Among those with different disease
status.
CRP Fold-rise |95%CI)
CM
0-d lag: 1.21 (0.86,1.70)
CM
1-d lag: 1.25 (0.97,1.58);
C0PD
0-d lag: 0.93 (0.48,1.80)
C0PD
1-d lag: 0.69 (0.33,1.46)
Healthy
0-d lag: 0.98 (0.88,1.08)
Healthy
1-d lag: 1.01 (0.841.21)
July 2009
E-66
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Statistical Package: SAS v8.02
Fibrinogen Fold-rise (95%CI)
CM
0-d lag: 1.02 (0.98,1.06)
CM
1-d lag: 1.0 (0.97,1.03);
C0PD
0-d lag: 1.0 (0.91,1.09)
C0PD
1-d lag: 1.08 (0.99,1.17)
Healthy
0-d lag: 0.94 (0.87,1.01)
Healthy
1-d lag: 0.99 (0.88,1.17)
D-dimer Fold-rise (95%CI)
CM
0-d lag: 1.02 (0.88,1.17)
CM
1-d lag: 1.03 (0.93,1.15):
C0PD
0-d lag: 1.04 (0.93,1.16)
COPD
1-d lag: 1.09 (0.94,1.27)
Healthy
0-d lag: 0.95 (0.79,1.14)
Healthy
1-d lag: 0.97 (0.71,1.31)
Among those with cardiovascular
disease
MCP-1 Fold-rise |95%CI)
0-d lag: 1.3 (1.1, 1.7)
1-d lag: 1.0 (0.9, 1.3)
ET-1 Fold-rise |95%CI)
0-d lag: 1.1 (0.8, 1.2)
1-d lag: 1.1 (0.9, 1.2)
Note: TNF-n and IL-6 measures were
below the limit of detection of assays
Reference: Timonen et al. (2006,
088747)
Period of Study: 1998-1999
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Erfurt, Germany
Helsinki, Finland
Outcome: Heart variability (HRV)
measurements: [LF, HF, LFHFR, NN
interval, SDNN, r-MSSD]
Study Design: Panel study
N: 131 elderly subjects with stable
coronary heart disease
Statistical Analysis: Linear mixed
models
Pollutant: PM2.6
Means: Amsterdam: 20.0
Erfurt: 23.3
Helsinki: 12.7
Copollutant: NO2, CO
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Effect Estimate: SDNN
¦0.33ms (95% CI:-1.05, 0.38)
HF: -0.3% (95% CI:-10.6, 5.4)
LFHFR: -1.4 (95% CI: -5.9, 8.7)
Notes: Followed for 6 months with
biweekly clinic visits
2-day lag. ULTRA Study
July 2009
E-67
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Vallejo et al. (2006,157081)
Period of Study: April-August 2002
Location: Mexico City metropolitan area
Outcome: Heart rate variability measures
(SDNN, pNN50)
Age Groups: Mean age 27 yrs
Study Design: Panel study
N: 40 young healthy participants (non-
smokers, no meds or history of CVD,
respiratory, neurological, or endocrine
Pollutant: PM2.6
(pDR nephelometric method-DataRAM)
Copollutant: None
PM Increment: 30 /yglm3
Effect Estimate: pNN50: 0 h lag: -0.01 %
(95% CI:-0.03, 0.01)
Statistical Analysis: Linear mixed
effects models
1 h:-0.01% (95% CI
2 h:-0.05% (95% CI
3 h:-0.07% (95% CI
4 h:-0.08% (95% CI
5 h:-0.06% (95% CI
6 h:-0.05% (95% CI
¦0.04, 0.02)
¦0.09,0.00)
¦0.13 to-0.02)
-0.14 to -0.01)
¦0.13,0.02)
¦0.13,0.04)
SDNN: Oh: 0.00% (95% CI: 0.00, 0.01)
1 h: 0.00% (95% CI:-0.01, 0.01)
2 h: 0.00% (95% CI:-0.02, 0.01)
3 h:-0.01% (95% CI:-0.02, 0.00)
4 h:-0.01% (95% CI:-0.02, 0.01)
5 h:-0.01% (95% CI:-0.02, 0.01)
6 h: 0.00% (95% CI: -0.02, 0.02)
Notes: Subjects underwent 13 h of ECG
monitoring and personal PM2.6
measurement. HRV measures were
regressed against different lags of PM2.6
concentration.
Reference: Van Hee et al. (2009,
192110)
Period of Study: Jul 2000-Aug 2002
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Chicago, Illinois
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
St. Paul
Minnesota
New York, New York
Los Angeles, California
Outcome: Left Ventricular Mass Index and Pollutant: PM2
Ejection Fraction
Age Groups: 45-84 yrs
Study Design: cross-sectional
N: 3,827 participants
Statistical Analyses: Linear
Models
Covariates: age, race, income, sex,
education, medication use, LDL, HDL,
physical activity, alcohol consumption,
smoking, diabetes, systolic BP, diastolic
BP
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: Stata
Lags Considered: NR
Averaging Time: NR
Mean (SD): figure only
Monitoring Stations: n/a
Interpolation used
Copollutant: NR
Co-pollutant Correlation
n/a
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Difference (Lower CI, Upper CI), p-
value:
Left Ventricular Mass Index
Unadjusted: -6.0 (-7.8, -4.2), <0.0001
All covariates except center, BP: -6.1 (¦
7.8,-4.4), <0.0001
All covariates except BP: 3.7 (-6.0,13.4),
0.46
Full model: 4.6(4.7,13.9), 0.33
Full model plus center/race interaction: 3.8
(-6.1,13.7),0.45
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
Unadjusted: 3.0 (2.2, 3.8), < 0.0001
All covariates except center, BP: 1.4 (0.5,
2.2),0.001
All covariates except BP: -1.1 (-5.8, 3.7),
0.66
Full model:-1.3 (-6.0, 3.5), 0.60
Full model plus center/race interaction: -
3.0 (-8.0, 2.0), 0.24
July 2009
E-68
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Wellenius et al. (2007,
092830)
Period of Study: February 2002-March
2003
Outcome: Circulating levels of B-type
natriuretic peptide (BNP
measured in whole blood at 0, 6,12
weeks)
Pollutant: PM2.6
Copollutant: NO2, SO2, O3, CO, BC
Location: Boston, Massachusetts, USA Study Design: Panel study
N: 28 subjects (each with chronic stable
HF and impaired systolic function)
Statistical Analysis: Linear mixed
effects models
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Effect Estimate: Same day PM2.6: 0.8%
increase in BNP (95% CI:-16.4, 21.5)
Notes: The study found no association
between any pollutant and measures of
BNP at any lag. Further, the within
subject coefficient of variation was large
suggesting the magnitude of effected air
pollutant health effects are small in
relation to within subject variability in
BNP.
Reference: Wellenius et al. (2007,
092830)
Period of Study: February 2002-March
2003
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10): B-type
natriuretic peptide (BNP) (natural-log
transformed)
Age Groups: 33-88 yrs
Study Design: Panel (blood collected at
0, 6, and 12 weeks)
N: 28 patients with chronic stable heart
failure and impaired systolic function
Statistical Analyses: Linear mixed-
effects models
Covariates: Temperature, dew point,
mean dew point over the past 3 days,
calendar month of blood draw, mea-
surement occasion, treatment assignment,
measurement occasion by treatment
assignment interaction
Season: Adjusted for calendar month
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS v9.1
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: Daily (assessed lags of
0-3 days)
Mean (SD): 10.9 (8.4)
Percentiles: 50th: 8.0/yg/m3
Range (Min, Max): 0.7-50.9//g|m3
Monitoring Stations: 1 monitor
Copollutant (correlation): CO (r - 0.35)
NO2 (r - 0.31)
SO2 (r - 0.18)
O3 (r - 0.35)
BC(r - 0.68)
PM Increment: IQr - 8.1 //g|m3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]: %
change in BNP per IQR increase in PM2.6
LagO: 1.5 (-18.7,19.2)
Lag1: 2.1 (-20.0, 30.3)
Lag2:1.3 (12.3,17.1)
Lag3: 5.6 (-16.8, 34.0)
Note: No significant associations
observed between any pollutant and BNP
levels at any lags (presented in Fig 2)
Reference: Wheeler et al. (2006,
088453)
Period of Study: Fall 1999 and spring
2000
Location: Atlanta, GA
Outcome: Heart rate variability
Age Groups: 49-76 years
N: 18 subjects with C0PD and 12
subjects with a recent Ml
Statistical Analysis: Linear-mixed effect
model
Season: Fall and spring
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time:
1 h
4 h
24 h
Mean: 24-hs: 17.8/yglm3
Copollutant: O3, CO, SO2, NO2
PM Increment: 11.65/yglm3 (IQR) in 4 h
PM2.6
Effect Estimate: Among C0PD patients:
8.3% increase in SDNN (95% CI: 1.7,
15.3)
Among Ml patients: 2.9% decrease in
SDNN (95% CI: -7.8, 2.3)
Results for 1 h and 24 h averaging times
were similar.
Notes: Data was collected on 7 days in
the Fall of 1999 or spring of 2000.
Effects were modified by medication use,
baseline pulmonary function, and health
status.
July 2009
E-69
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CTT
Reference: Yeatts et al. (2007, 091266)
Outcome: Heart Rate Variability
Pollutant: PM2.6
PM Increment: 1 /yglm3
Period of Study: 12 wk period bit Sept
Age Groups: 21-50 yrs
Averaging Time: 24h
Beta, SE (Lower CI, Upper CI), p-value:
2003 -July 2004
Study Design: panel
Mean (SD): 12.5 (6.0)
HRV
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
N: 12 asthmatics
Min: 0.6
Max Heart Rate: 0.40, 0.43 (-0.45,1.24),
0.36
Statistical Analyses: Linear Mixed
Max: 37.1
Model
ASDNN5: -0.07, 0.15 (-0.37, 0.22), 0.63
Monitoring Stations: 1
Covariates: temperature, humidity,
Copollutant: PMwj,, PMio
SDANN5: 1.66,0.65 (0.39, 2.93), 0.02
pressure
Co-pollutant Correlation
SDNN24HR(mesc): 1.16,0.58(0.02,
Dose-response Investigated? No
2.29), 0.06
Statistical Package: SAS
PM 10-2.B - 0.46*
rMSSD: 0.53, 0.20 (0.14,0.91), 0.01
Lags Considered: 1 day
PMio - NR
pNN50 24hour:-0.06, 0.11 (-0.27,0.15),
*p<0.01
0.58
pNN50 7min: 0.47, 0.42 (-0.35,1.29),
0.27
Low-frequency power: -0.23, 0.14 (-0.51,
0.05), 0.11
Percent low frequency: -0.78, 0.41 (-1.59,
0.03), 0.07
High-frequency power: 0.14, 0.07 (-0.01,
0.28), 0.07
Percent high frequency: 0.64, 0.36 (-0.07,
1.34), 0.09
Blood Lipids
Triglycerides: -0.63, 0.84 (-2.29,1.02),
0.46
VLDL:-0.17, 0.22 (-0.61, 0.26), 0.44
Total cholesterol: -0.06, 0.22 (-0.49,
0.36), 0.77
Hematologic Factor
Circulating eosinophils: -0.02, 0.00 (-0.02,
-0.02), 0.27
Platelets: -0.01, 0.45 (-0.88, 0.86), 0.98
Circulating Proteins
Plasminogen: 0.00, 0.00 (-0.01, 0.00),
0.82
Fibrenogen: 0.00, 0.01 (-0.01, 0.02), 0.59
Von Willibrand factor: -0.31, 0.29 (-0.87,
0.25), 0.28
Factor VII: -0.65, 0.33 (-1.29, -0.01), 0.05
July 2009
E-70
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Yue et al. (2007, 097968)
Period of Study: October 2000-April
2001
Location: Erfurt, Germany
Outcome: QT interval and T-wave
amplitude for ECG recordings, and vWF,
CRP from blood samples
Study Design: Panel study
N: 56 patients (male CAD patients with
12 clinical visits)
Statistical Analysis: Linear and logistic
regression models
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: PM2.6, Particle Number
Concentration (PNC) (n/cm3)
Averaging Time: Mean: Mass
concentrations of PNC (0.1-2.84 n/cm3)
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant: None
PM Increment:. IQR
Effect Estimate: Each IQR increase in 0-
23 h mean traffic particle concentration
was associated with: QT interval: 0.6%
(95% CI:-0.3,1.4)
T wave amplitude: -1.6% (95% CI: -3.3,
0.1)
vWF: 3.2% (95% CI:-0.5, 7.0)
CRP: (OR - 1.5
95% CI 1.0-2.3)
Each IQR increase in 0-23 h mean
combustion-generated particle
concentration was associated with: QT
interval: 0.1 %(-0.3, 0.6)
T wave amplitude: -0.2% (-1.2, 0.7)
vWF: 2.8% (0.8, 4.8)
CRP (OR - 1.0
0.8, 1.2)
Notes: Five sources of particles were
identified (airborne soil, local traffic-
related ultrafine particles, combustion-
generated aerosols, diesel traffic-related
particles, and secondary aerosols).
July 2009
E-71
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Reference: Yue et al. (2007, 097968)
Period of Study: Oct 12, 2000-Apr 27,
2001
Location: Erfurt, Germany
Design & Methods
Outcome: QT interval, T wave amplitude,
von Willebrand factor (vWF), C-reactive
protein (CRP
above 90th percentile compared to below)
Age Groups: >50 yrs
Study Design: Panel (12 visits
625 observations for repolarization
parameters and 578 observations for
inflammatory markers)
N: 57 male coronary artery disease
patients
Statistical Analyses: Linear and logistic
fixed-effects regression models
(generalized additive models)
Covariates: Trend, weekday, and
meteorological variables (temperature,
relative humidity, barometric pressure)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS v9.1 and S-
Plus v6.0
Concentrations'
Pollutant: Five particle source factors
(airborne soil, local traffic-related ultrafine
particles, combustion-generated aerosols,
diesel traffic-related particles, and
secondary aerosols)
see below for size fractions (factor scores)
Averaging Time: Used daily factor scores
in analyses
Mean (SD): Factor 1: particles from
airborne soil (1.0-2.8//m): 2390 (1696)
Factor 2: ultrafine particles from local
traffic (0.01-0.1 //m): 9931 (5858)
Factor 3: secondary aerosols from local
fuel combustion (0.1 -0.5 //m): 3770
(6129)
Factor 4: particles from traffic (0.01-
0.5 //m): 6865 (5689)
Factor 5: secondary aerosols from multiple
sources (0.2-1.0/ym): 4732 (3890)
Median: Factor 1: 2053
Factor 2: 8531
Factor 3: 1348
Factor 4: 5045
Factor 5: 3752
IQR (5-day avg): Factor 1: 1110
Factor 2: 5749
Factor 3: 4124
Factor 4: 5000
Factor 5: 3393
Range (Min, Max): Factor 1: 284,12960
Factor 2: 866, 26632
Factor 3: 139, 39097
Factor 4: 283, 27605
Factor 5: 67,20129
Monitoring Stations: 1 monitor
Copollutant: NA
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
PM Increment: IQR
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
QT interval, % change (95%CI)
Factor 1: 0-5h: -0.1 (-0.6, 0.6)
6-11h:-0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
12-17h: 0.1 (-0.4,0.4)
18-23h:-0.2 (-0.7, 0.2)
0-23h: -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
1 d: -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
2d: -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
3d:-0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
4d: -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
0-4d avg: -0.7 (-1.8, 0.3)
Factor 2: 0-5h: 0.2 (-0.4, 0.8)
6-11 h: 0.8(-0.0, 1.7)
12-17h: 0.6 (-0.2,1.4)
18-23h: 0.5 (-0.4,1.4)
0-23h: 0.9 (-0.1, 2.0)
1 d: 1.5(0.3,2.7)
2d: -0.4 (-1.7, 1.0)
3d: 0.5(-0.9,1.9)
4d: 0.1 (-1.2,1.4)
0-4d avg: 1.6 (-0.1, 3.3)
Factor 3: 0-5h: 0.1 (-0.3, 0.5)
6-11 h: 0.2(-0.3, 0.6)
12-17h: 0.2 (-0.3, 0.6)
18-23h: 0.1 (-0.3, 0.4)
0-23h: 0.1 (-0.3, 0.6)
1d: 0.1 (-0.3, 0.4)
2d:-0.1 (-0.4,0.3)
3d: -0.2 (-0.5, 0.2)
4d: -0.1 (-0.5, 0.2)
0-4d avg:-0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Factor 4: 0-5h: 0.2 (-0.4, 0.8)
6-11 h: 0.8(0.0, 1.6)
12-17h: 0.5 (-0.2,1.3)
18-23h: 0.5 (-0.2,1.2)
0-23h: 0.6(-0.3, 1.4)
1d: -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
2d: -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
3d:-0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
4d: -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
0-4d avg:-0.3 (-1.7,1.1)
Factor 5: n0-5h: 1.0( 0.1,2.1)
6-11h: 0.9 (-0.2, 2.0)
12-17h: 0.3 (-0.7,1.4)
18-23h: -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
0-23h: 0.7(-0.6,1.9)
PMTl-T P,1 ^)0T CITE 0R QU0TE
2d: -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
3d: -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
July 2009
E-72
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Zanobetti et al. (2004,
087489)
Period of Study: 1999 to 2001
Location: Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Outcome: Blood pressure (systolic blood
pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean
arterial blood pressure)
Age Groups: Elderly
Study Design: Panel study
N: 62 elderly subjects with n - 631
repeated visits for cardiac rehabilitation
Statistical Analysis: Linear mixed
effects models
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Median (10th—90th percentile)
Median: 8.8/yg/m3
10th-90th: 13.4
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant: SO2, O3, CO, NO2, BC
120-h avg
Median: 0.651
10th-90th: 0.376
PM Increment: .10.4/yg/m3 for 5 day
mean, 13.9 //g|m3 for 2-day mean
Effect Estimate: Each 10.4/yg/m3
increase in 5 day mean PM2.6
concentration was associated with:
Systolic BP: 2.8mmHg (95% CI: 0.1, 5.5)
Diastolic BP: 2.7mmHg (95% CI: 1.2, 4.3)
Mean arterial BP: 2.7mmHg (95% CI: 1.0,
4.5)
Each 13.9/yglm3 increase in 2-day mean
PM2.5, during exercise in person with
H.70bpm
Diastolic: 7.0mmHg (95% CI: 2.3,12.1)
Mean arterial BP: 4.7mmHg (95% CI: 0.5,
9.1)
July 2009
E-73
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Zeka et al. (2006,157177)
Period of Study: Nov 2000-Dec 2004
Location: Greater Boston area
(Massachusetts)
Outcome: White blood cells (WBC), C-
reactive protein (CRP), sediment rate,
fibrinogen
Age Groups: Mean age (SD) - 73.0 (6.7)
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 710 subjects
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression
Covariates: Age, BMI, season (also
assessed potential for confounding by
temperature, RH, barometric pressure,
hypertensive or cardiac medications,
hypertension, smoking, alcohol, and
fasting glucose levels)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: BC
Averaging Time: Hourly (PN, BC, PM2 e)
and 24-h (S042-) measurements used to
create 48-h, 1-wk, and 4-wk moving
averages
Mean (SD): 0.77 (0.63)
Percentiles: 50th: 0.61
75th: 1.00
90th: 1.51
Monitoring Stations: 2 sites
Units: ngfm3
Copollutant (correlation): PM2.B
(r - 0.52)
BC
PN (r - 0.30)
S042- (r - 0.30)
PM Increment: 1 SD increase
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]: %
increase (95% CI) in biomarker per 1 SD
increase in pollutant.
Fibrinogen
48 h: 0.84 (-0.63, 2.31)
1 wk: 0.60 (-0.95, 2.15)
4wk: 1.78(0.19,3.36)
CRP
48 h: 4.51 (-2.03,11.06)
1wk: 1.07 (-5.55,7.68)
4wk: 5.41 (-1.00,11.81)
Sediment rate
48 h: -4.56 (-25.55,16.43)
1 wk: 1.98(-18.15, 22.11)
4wk: 21.65 (1.48, 41.82)
WBC count
48 h: -0.63 (-2.45,1.19)
1 wk: -0.13 (-1.87,1.60)
4 wk:-0.55 (-2.36,1.26)
Note: No statistically significant
difference was reported for any category
of effect modifiers (age, obesity,
medications, homozygous for the deletion
of GSTM1-null, hypertension)
however, results suggested almost all the
effect of BC on sediment rate was among
the younger group (<78 yrs)
there was a 4-fold difference for the
association between BC and CRP in the
presence of obesity
also evidence for effect modification by
obesity of the association between BC
and sediment rate
there was a suggestive greater effect of
BC on CRP among GSTMI-null subjects
(9.73% [1.48,17.98]) vs. GSTM1-present
subjects (-2.97% [-14.05, 8.10] for
concentrations 4-wk prior)
a stronger effect of BC on sediment rate
was seen among non-users of statins
(36.01% [13.88, 58.13]) vs users
(-12.29% [39.13,14.55])
July 2009
E-74
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Zeka et al. (2006,157177)
Period of Study: Nov 2000-Dec 2004
Location: Greater Boston area
(Massachusetts)
Outcome: White blood cells (WBC), C-
reactive protein (CRP), sediment rate,
fibrinogen
Age Groups: Mean age (SD) - 73.0 (6.7)
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 710 subjects
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression
Covariates: Age, BMI, season (also
assessed potential for confounding by
temperature, RH, barometric pressure,
hypertensive or cardiac medications,
hypertension, smoking, alcohol, and
fasting glucose levels)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: S042-
Averaging Time: Hourly (PN, BC, PM2 e)
and 24-h (S042-) measurements used to
create 48-h, 1-wk, and 4-wk moving
averages
Mean (SD): 2.29(1.62)
Percentiles: 50th: 1.84
75th: 2.81
90th: 4.10
Monitoring Stations: 2 sites
Copollutant (correlation): PM2.B
(r - 0.50)
BC (r - 0.30)
PN (r - -0.15)
S042-
PM Increment: 1 SD increase
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]: %
increase (95% CI) in biomarker per 1 SD
increase in pollutant.
Fibrinogen: 48 h: 0.60 (-1.23, 2.42)
1 wk: 0.03(-1.93,1.99)
4wk: 1.12(-0.52, 2.77)
CRP: 48 h: 1.57 (-7.13,10.27)
1 wk: 0.21 (-8.27, 8.69)
4wk: 5.29 (-1.91,12.49)
Sediment rate: 48 h: 4.05 (-23.26,
31.36)
1 wk: -5.87 (-32.39, 20.64)
4 wk: -1.60 (-25.24, 22.04)
WBC count: 48 h: -0.12 (-2.35, 2.11)
1 wk: -0.48 (-2.87,1.90)
4wk: 0.75(-1.30, 2.80)
Note: No statistically significant
difference was reported for any category
of effect modifiers (age, obesity,
medications, homozygous for the deletion
of GSTM1-null, hypertension)
Reference: Zeka et al. (2006,157177)
Period of Study: Nov 2000-Dec 2004
Location: Greater Boston area
(Massachusetts)
Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10): White blood Pollutant: PM2 e
cells (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP),
sediment rate, fibrinogen
Age Groups: Mean age (SD) - 73.0 (6.7)
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 710 subjects
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression
Covariates: Age, BMI, season (also
assessed potential for confounding by
temperature, RH, barometric pressure,
hypertensive or cardiac medications,
hypertension, smoking, alcohol, and
fasting glucose levels)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Averaging Time: Hourly (PN, BC, PM2 e)
and 24-h (S042-) measurements used to
create 48-h, 1-wk, and 4-wk moving
averages
Mean (SD): 11.16 (7.95)
Percentiles: 50th: 9.39
75th: 14.57
90th: 21.48
Monitoring Stations: 2 sites
Copollutant (correlation): PM2 e
BC (r - 0.52)
PN (r - -0.02)
S042- (r - 0.50)
PM Increment: 1 SD increase
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]: %
increase (95% CI) in biomarker per 1 SD
increase in pollutant.
Fibrinogen: 48 h:-0.18 (-1.93,1.57)
1 wk: -1.39 (-3.46, 0.67)
4wk: 1.14 (-0.60, 2.88)
CRP: 48 h:-4.88 (-13.29, 3.53)
1 wk: -1.37 (-10.44,7.71)
4 wk: 4.36 (-3.25,11.96)
Sediment rate: 48 h: -16.91 (-43.66,
9.84)
1 wk:-18.89 (-47.48, 9.70)
4wk: 24.93 (0.68, 49.18)
WBC count: 48 h: -3.18 (-5.39 to -0.97)
1 wk: -0.51 (-3.02, 2.00)
4wk: -0.03 (-2.17, 2.10)
Note: No statistically significant
difference was reported for any category
of effect modifiers (age, obesity,
medications, homozygous for the deletion
of GSTM1-null, hypertension)
Reference: Zhang et al. (2009,191970) Outcome: Myocardial Ischemia
Period of Study: 1999-2003
Location: US
Age Groups: 52-90
Study Design: panel
N: 55,529
Statistical Analyses: Logistic 81 Linear
ession
Covariates: age, race/ethnicity,
education, exam site, BMI, current
Pollutant: PM2.B
Averaging Time: NR
Mean (SD):
Lag 0: 14.1 (8)
Lag 1:13.8 (8)
Lag 2: 13.8(8)
Lag 3: 13.8(8)
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Odds Ratio (Lower CI, Upper CI), lag:
Minnesota Codes*
MC4: 1.04 (0.97,1.10), lag 0-2
MC4: 1.04 (0.98,1.11), lag 3-5
MC5: 1.05 (1.00,1.09), lag 0-2
MC5: 1.04 (1.00,1.08), lag 3-5
July 2009
E-75
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
smoking status, history of CHD, diabetes,
hypertension, SBP, chronic lung disease,
or hypercholesterolemia, day of week,
time of day, temperature, dew point,
pressure, season
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 0-5d
Lag 4: 13.9(8)
Lag 5: 14.1 (8)
Lag 0-2: 13.9(7)
Monitoring Stations: NR*
Co-pollutant: NR
Monitors used in model for spatial
interpolation of daily PM values.
MC 4 or 5:1.04 (1.00,1.09), lag 0-2
MC 4 or 5:1.03 (0.99,1.07), lag 3-5
Change (Lower CI, Upper CI), lag:
ST-segment amplitude
Lead I: -0.07 (-0.36, 0.21), lag 0-2
Lead I: 0.18 (-0.10, 0.46), lag 3-5
Lead II: -0.12 (-0.47, 0.23), lag 0-2
Lead II: 0.16 (-0.18, 0.50), lag 3-5
Lead aVL:-0.01 (-0.25, 0.23), lag 0-2
LeadaVL: 0.11 (-0.12, 0.34), lag 3-5
Lead V1: -0.02 (-0.39, 0.35), lag 0-2
Lead V1: -0.22 (-0.58, 0.14), lag 3-5
Lead V2: 0.07 (-0.57, 0.70), lag 0-2
Lead V2: -0.01 (-0.61, 0.62), lag 3-5
Lead V3: -0.11 (-0.68, 0.47), lag 0-2
Lead V3: -0.02 (-0.58, 0.54), lag 3-5
Lead V4: -0.0.3 (-0.51, 0.45), lag 0-2
Lead V4: 0.24( 0.23, 0.71), lag 3-5
Lead V5: -0.01 (-0.41, 0.39), lag 0-2
Lead V5: 0.35 (-0.04, 0.74), lag 3-5
Lead V6: 0.02 (-0.30, 0.33), lag 0-2
Lead V6: 0.35 (0.04, 0.65), lag 3-5
T-wave amplitude
Lead I: -1.60 (-3.07, -0.13), lag 0-2
Lead I: -0.31 (-1.73,1.11), lag 3-5
Lead II: -0.54 (-1.99,0.92), lag 0-2
Lead II: 0.71 (-0.70,2.13), lag 3-5
Lead aVL:-1.21 (-2.50,0.10), lag 0-2
Lead aVL:-0.55 (-1.18, 0.71), lag 3-5
Lead V1: 1.45( 0.16, 3.06), lag 0-2
Lead V1: 0.03 (-1.53,1.59), lag 3-5
Lead V2: -0.18 (-2.96, 2.60), lag 0-2
Lead V2: 0.57 (-2.12, 3.27), lag 3-5
Lead V3: -2.33 (-5.15, 0.49), lag 0-2
Lead V3: -0.13 (-2.87, 2.60), lag 3-5
Lead V4: -2.03 (-4.69, 0.63), lag 0-2
Lead V4: 0.64 (-1.94, 3.22), lag 3-5
Lead V5: -1.92 (-4.22, 0.38), lag 0-2
Lead V5: 0.55 (-1.69, 2.78), lag 3-5
Lead V6: -0.63 (-2.36,1.10), lag 0-2
Lead V6: 0.82 (-0.86, 2.49), lag 3-5
QRSi'T angles and heart rate (change)
QRS/T angle - spatial (°): 0.19 (-0.21,
0.59), lag 0-2
QRS/T angle - spatial (°): -0.20 (-0.59,
0.19), lag 3-5
July 2009
E-76
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
QRS/T angle - frontal (°): 0.13 (-0.24,
0.50), lag 0-2
QRS/T angle - frontal (°): 0.35 (-0.01,
0.71), lag 3-5
Heart Rate (beats/min): 0.16 (0.02, 0.30),
lag 0-2
Heart Rate (beats/min): 0.04 (-0.10, 0.18),
lag 3-5
"Any ST abnormality (MC 4.1-4.4)
Any T abnormality (MC 5.1-5.4)
'All units expressed in /_yg/m' unless otherwise specified.
Table E-4. Short-term exposure - cardiovascular morbidity studies - other size fractions.
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Adar et al. (2007, 001458)
Period of Study: March-June 2002
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Outcome: Heart rate variability: heart
rate, standard deviation of all normal-to-
normal intervals (SDNN), square root of
the mean squared difference between
adjacent normal-to-normal intervals
(rMSSD), percentage of adjacent normal-
to-normal intervals that differed by more
than 50 ms (pNN50), high frequency
power (HF
in the range of 0.15-0.4Hz), low
frequency power (LF, in the range of
0.04-0.15Hz), and the ratio of LF/HF
Age Groups: a 60 yrs
Study Design: Panel (4 planned repeated
measures with a total of 158 person-trips
35 participating in all 4 trips)
N: 44 participants
Statistical Analyses: Generalized
additive models
Covariates: Subject, weekday, time,
apparent temperature, trip type, activity,
medications, and autoregressive terms
Season: Limited data collection period
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS v8.02, R
V2.0.1
Pollutant: Particle count fine (PC fine)
(particles/cm3)
Averaging Time: Measurements
collected over 48 h period surrounding
the bus trip (during which health
endpoints were measured) used to
calculate 5-, 30-, 60-minute, 4-h, 24-h
moving averages
Median (IQR): All: 42 (57)
Facility: 36 (45)
Bus: 105(96)
Activity: 50 (133)
Lunch: 69 (48)
Monitoring Stations: 2 portable carts
Copollutant: PM2.6
BC
Fine particle counts
Coarse particle counts
Correlation notes: 24-h mean PM2.6, BC,
and fine particle count concentrations
ranged from 0.80 to 0.98
r - 0.76 to 0.97 when limited to time
spent on the bus
r - 0.55 to 0.86 when comparing bus
concentrations to 24-h moving averages
r - -0.003 to 0.51 when comparing 5-
min averages and 24-h moving averages.
Poor correlations found between coarse
particle count concentrations and all fine
particulate measures during all times
periods
PM Increment: IQR
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
% change (95%CI) in HRV per IQR in the
24-h moving avg of the
microenvironmental pollutant (IQr - 39
pt/cm3)
Single-pollutant models
SDNN:-5.1 (-5.8 to-4.4)
rMSSD:-8.0 (-8.7 to-7.2)
pNN50 + 1:-10.2 (-11.3 to -9.0)
LF:-9.9 (-11.4 to-8.4)
HF:-13.7 (-15.1 to-12.2)
LF/HF: 4.3 (3.1, 5.5)
H: 0.9(0.8,1.1)
Note: Exposure to health associations by
all lag periods presented in Figure 2
(magnitude of associations increased
with averaging period, with the largest
associations consistently found for 24-h
moving averages)
Reference: Adar et al. (2007, 001458)
Period of Study: March-June 2002
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Outcome: Heart rate variability: heart
rate, standard deviation of all normal-to-
normal intervals (SDNN), square root of
the mean squared difference between
adjacent normal-to-normal intervals
(rMSSD), percentage of adjacent normal-
to-normal intervals that differed by more
than 50 ms (pNN50), high frequency
power (HF
in the range of 0.15-0.4Hz), low
frequency power (LF, in the range of
Pollutant: Particle count coarse (PT
coarse) (pt/cm3)
Averaging Time: Measurements
collected over48-h period surrounding
the bus trip (during which health
endpoints were measured) used to
calculate 5-, 30-, 60-minute, 4-h, and 24-
h moving averages
Median (IQR): All: 0.02(0.11)
Facility: 0.01 (0.04)
PM Increment: IQR
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
% change (95%CI) in HRV per IQR in the
24-h moving avg of the
microenvironmental pollutant (IQr
- 0.066 pt/cm3)
Single-pollutant models
SDNN: 2.4(1.3, 3.6)
rMSSD: 3.9 (2.6, 5.1)
July 2009
E-77
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
0.04-0.15Hz), and the ratio of LF/HF
Age Groups: a 60 yrs
Study Design: Panel (4 planned
measures with a total of 158 person-trips
35 participating in all 4 trips)
N: 44 participants
Statistical Analyses: Generalized
additive models
Covariates: Subject, weekday, time,
apparent temperature, trip type, activity,
medications, and autoregressive terms
Season: Limited data collection period
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS v8.02, R
V2.0.1
Bus: 0.16(0.13)
Activity: 0.29 (0.26)
Lunch: 0.16(0.36)
Monitoring Stations:
2 portable carts
Copollutant: PM2.6
BC
Fine particle counts
Coarse particle counts
Correlation notes: 24-h mean PM2.6, BC,
and fine particle count concentrations
ranged from 0.80 to 0.98
r - 0.76 to 0.97 when limited to time
spent on the bus
r - 0.55 to 0.86 when comparing bus
concentrations to 24-h moving averages
r - -0.003 to 0.51 when comparing 5-
min averages and 24-h moving averages.
Poor correlations found between coarse
particle count concentrations and all fine
particulate measures during all times
periods
pNN50 + 1:2.9(1.0, 4.9)
LF: 6.4 (3.7,9.1)
HF: 10.2 (7.4,13.1)
LF/HF: -3.3 (-5.0 to-1.6)
H:-1.1 (-1.3 to-0.8)
Two-pollutant models (with PM2.5):
SDNN: -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
rMSSD: -1.3 (-2.6 to -0.05)
pNN50 + 1:-4.3 (-6.3 to-2.4)
LF: 0.2 (-2.5, 3.0)
HF: 1.3 (-1.5,4.1)
LF/HF: -0.9 (-2.7,1.0)
H: -0.6 (-0.9 to-0.4)
Note: Exposure to health associations by
all lag periods presented in Figure 2
(magnitude of associations increased
with averaging period, with the largest
associations consistently found for 24-h
moving averages)
Reference: Delfino et al. (2008,156390) Outcome: C-reactive protein (CRP)
Period of Study: 2005-2006
Location: Los Angeles, California, air
basin
fibrinogen, tumor necrosis factor-n (TNF-
~) and its soluble receptor-ll (TNF-RII)
interleukin-6 (IL-6)
and its soluble receptor (IL-6sR)
fibrin D-dimer
soluble platelet selectin (sP-selectin)
soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1
(sVCAM-1)
intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-
1)
and myeloperoxidase (MPO)
erythrocyte lysates for glutathione
peroxidase-1 (GPx-1)
copper-zinc superoxide dismutase (cu, Zn-
SOD)
Age Groups: a 65 yrs
Study Design: Panel (biomarkers
measured weekly 12 times)
N: 29 participants (nonsmoking with
history of coronary artery disease)
Statistical Analyses: Mixed models
Covariates: temperature (infectious
illnesses were excluded by excluding
weeks with such observations)
Season: Collected 6 weeks of data
during warm period and 6 weeks of data
during cool period
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Pollutant: PM (multiple size fractions
and components)
Averaging Time: 24-h avg preceding the
blood draw (lag 0) and cumulative
averages up to 5 days preceding the draw
Outdoor hourly PM: EC: Mean (SD):
1.61 (0.62)
Median: 1.56
IQR: 0.92
Min, Max: 0.24, 3.94
0C: Mean (SD): 5.94 (2.11)
Median: 5.58
IQR: 2.79
Min-Max: 2.51,13.60
BC: Mean (SD): 2.00(0.77)
Median: 1.89
IQR: 0.96
Min-Max: 0.58, 5.11
OCpri: Mean (SD): 3.37 (1.21)
Median: 3.21
IQR: 1.63
Min-Max: 0.99,7.11
Secondary 0C: Mean (SD): 2.49 (1.50)
Median: 2.10
IQR: 1.86
Min-Max: 0, 8.10
PN (p/cm3): Mean (SD): 16,043 (5886)
Median: 13,968
PM Increment: IQR
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Note: Nearly all results presented in
figures
Results: The authors found significant
positive associations for CRP, IL-6, sTNF-
Rll, and sP-selectin with outdoor and/or
indoor concentrations of quasi-ultrafine
PM ~ 0.25 |Jm in diameter, EC, OCpri, BC,
PN, CO, and nitrogen dioxide from the
current-day and multiday averages. There
were consistent positive but largely
nonsignificant coefficients for TNF-n,
sVCAM-1, and sICAM-1, but not
fibrinogen, IL-6sR, or D-dimer. The
authors found inverse associations for
erythrocyte Cu, Zn-S0D with these
pollutants and other PM size fractions
(0.25-2.5 and 2.5-10 |Jm). Inverse
associations of GPx-1 and MPO with
pollutants were largely nonsignificant.
Indoor associations were often stronger
for estimated indoor EC, OCpri, and PN of
outdoor origin than for uncharacterized
indoor measurements. There was no
evidence for positive associations with
S0A.
July 2009
E-78
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
IQR: 7,386
Min-Max: 6837,31263
Indoor hourly PM EC: Mean (SD): 1.31
(0.52)
Median: 1.30
IQR: 0.70
Min-Max: 0.19, 2.89
EC of outdoor origin: Mean (SD): 1.11
(0.39)
Median: 1.06
IQR: 0.51
Min-Max: 0.41,2.97
0C: Mean (SD): 5.69 (1.51)
Median: 5.60
IQR: 1.96
Min-Max: 2.34,10.79
OCpri of outdoor origin: Mean (SD): 2.18
(0.82)
Median: 2.15
IQR: 1.07
Min-Max: 0.32, 5.21
Secondary 0C of outdoor origin: Mean
(SD): 2.08(1.26)
Median: 1.75
IQR: 1.45
Min-Max: 0, 6.87
PN (particles/cm3): Mean (SD): 14,494
(6770)
Median: 12,341
IQR: 7,337
Min-Max: 1016, 43027
PN of outdoor origin (pfcm3): Mean (SD):
10,108(3108)
Median: 9,580
IQR: 3,684
Min-Max: 1016,17700
Outdoor PM mass PM0.2e: Mean (SD):
9.47 (2.97)
Median: 9.4
IQR: 4.2
Min-Max: 3.31,18.75
PM0.2b-2.b: Mean (SD): 13.53(10.67)
Median: 11.7
IQR: 11.5
Min-Max: 1.29, 66.77
PM2.B io: Mean (SD): 10.04 (4.07)
Median: 9.9
IQR: 5.9
July 2009
E-79
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Min-Max: 1.76, 22.38
Indoor PM mass PM0.2e: Mean (SD):
10.45 (6.77)
Median: 9.5
IQR: 4.5
Min-Max: 1.42, 69.86
PMo.26-2.6 (/yglm3): Mean (SD): 7.36 (4.57)
Median: 6.5
IQR: 5.7
Min-Max: 0.77, 30.86
PM2.B10: Mean (SD): 4.12(4.76)
Median: 2.8
IQR: 3.5
Min-Max: 0.12, 37.63
Copollutant: Outdoor hourly gases (NO2,
CO, O3) and indoor hourly gases (NO2, CO)
Reference: Pekkanen et al. (2002,
035050)
Period of Study: Winter 1998 to 1999
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Outcome: ST Segment Depression
(> 0.1 mV)
Study Design: Panel of ULTRA Study
participants
N: 45 Subjects, n - 342 biweekly
submaximal exercise tests, 72 exercise
induced ST Segment Depressions
Statistical Analysis: Logistic regression
I GAM
Pollutant: Ultrafine NC0.01-0.1 fjm
(n/cm3)
Averaging Time: 24 h
Median: 14,890
IQR: 9830
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant: NO2, CO, PM2.6, PMio-2.5,
PM1.ACP
PM Increment: IQR
Effect Estimate(s): NC0.01 -0.1: OR
- 3.14(1.56,6.32), lag 2
Notes: The effect was strongest for ACP
and PM2.E, which in two pollutant models
appeared independent. Increases in NO2
and CO were also associated with
increased risk of ST segment depression,
but not with coarse particles.
Reference: Peters et al. (2005, 095747)
Also Peters et al, 2005 (2005,156859)
Period of Study: February 1999-July
2001
Location: Augsburg, Germany
Outcome: Myocardial infarction
Study Design: Case-crossover
N: 691 myocardial infarction patients
Statistical Analysis: Conditional logistic
regression
Dose-response investigated (yes/no)?
No
Pollutant: Ultrafine (TNC) (n/cm3)
Averaging Time: 1 h: Median - 10,001
IQR: 7919
24 h: Median - 10,934
IQR: 6276
Copollutant: NO2, SO2, CO
PM Increment: Effect Estimate: 2-h
lag: OR - 0.95
95% CI: 0.84,1.06
24-h mean, 2-day lag: OR - 1.04
95% CI: 0.90,1.20
Notes: Examined triggering for Ml at
various lags before Ml onset (up to 6 h
before Ml, up to 5 days before Ml). No
statistically significant increases in
lagged ultrafine particle concentration
were found.
Reference: Ruckerl et al. (2006,
088754)
Period of Study: Oct 2000—Apr 2001
Location: Erfurt, Germany
Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10): C-reactive
protein (CRP)
serum amyloid A (SAA)
E-selectin
von Willebrand Factor (vWF)
intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-
1)
fibrinogen
Factor VII
prothrombin fragment 1 +2
D-dimer
Age Groups: 50+ yrs
Study Design: Panel (12 re
measures at 2-wk intervals)
N: 57 male subjects with coronary
disease
Pollutant: AP (n/cm3)
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 1593 (1034)
Percentiles:
25: 821
50: 1238
75: 2120
Range (Min, Max): 328,4908
Unit (i.e./yg/m3): n/cm3
Monitoring Stations: 1 site
Copollutant: UFPs (ultrafine particles)
AP (accumulation mode particles)
PM2.6
PM10
PM Increment: IQR (1299
5-davg: 1127)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Effects of air pollution on blood markers
presented as OR (95%CI) for an increase
in the blood marker above the 90th
percentile per increase in IQR air
pollutant.
CRP Time before draw: 0 to 23 h: 0.7
(0.5, 1.2)
24 to 47 h: 1.5(0.9, 2.6)
48 to 71 h: 3.2(1.7,6.0)
5-d mean: 1.5 (0.8, 3.0)
ICAM-1 Time before draw: 0 to 23 h: 0.6
(0.4, 0.9)
24 to 47 h: 1.8(1.2, 2.8)
48 to 71 h: 1.6(1.0, 2.5)
July 2009
E-80
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Statistical Analyses: Fixed effects
linear and logistic regression models
Covariates: Models adjusted for
different factors based on health
endpoint
CRP: RH, temperature, trend, ID
ICAM-1: temperature, trend, ID
vWF: air pressure, RH, temperature,
trend, ID
FVII: air pressure, RH, temperature, trend,
ID, weekday
Season: Time trend as covariate
Dose-response Investigated?
Sensitivity analyses examined nonlinear
exposure-response functions
Statistical Package: SAS v8.2 and S-
Plus v6.0
OC (organic carbon)
EC (elemental carbon)
NO?
CO
5-d mean: 0.9 (0.6,1.5)
Effects of air pollution on blood markers
presented as % change from the
meanfGM in the blood marker per
increase in IQR air pollutant.
vWF Time before draw: 0 to 23 h: 4.8
(0.2, 9.3)
24 to 47 h: 5.9(0.4,11.5)
48 to 71 h: 7.0(0.7,13.4)
5-d mean: 13.5 (6.3, 20.6)
FVII Time before draw: 0 to 23 h: 0.0
(-2.9, 3.0)
24 to 47 h:-2.9 (-6.1, 0.4)
48 to 71 h: -3.6 (-6.8 to -0.3)
5-d mean: -4.1 (-7.9 to -0.3)
Note: summary of results presented in
figures.
SAA results indicate increase in
association with PM (not as strong and
consistent as with CRP)
no association observed between E-
selectin and PM
an increase in prothrombin fragment 1 +2
was consistently observed, particularly
with lag 4
fibrinogen results revealed few significant
associations, potentially due to chance
D-dimer results revealed null associations
in linear and logistic analyses
Reference: Ruckerl et al. (2006,
088754)
Period of Study: Oct 2000—Apr 2001
Location: Erfurt, Germany
Outcome: Soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L),
platelets, leukocytes, erythrocytes,
hemoglobin
Age Groups: 50+ yrs
Study Design: Panel (12 re
measures at 2-wk intervals)
N: 57 male subjects with coronary
disease
Statistical Analyses: Fixed effects
linear regression models
Covariates: Long-term time trend,
weekday of the visit, temperature, RH,
barometric pressure
Season: Time trend as covariate
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS v8.2 and S-
Plus v6.0
Pollutant: AP (n/cm3)
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 1593 (1034)
Percentiles: 25th: 821
50th: 1238
75th: 2120
Range (Min, Max): 328,4908
Monitoring Stations: 1 site
Copollutant: UFPs (ultrafine particles)
AP (accumulation mode particles)
PM2.6
PM10
NO
PM Increment: IQR (1299
5-davg: 1127)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Effects of air pollution on blood markers
presented as % change from the
meanfGM in the blood marker per
increase in IQR air pollutant.
sCD40L, % change GM (pg/mL)
lagO: 6.9(0.5,13.8)
Iag1: -1.1 (-8.0,6.4)
Iag2: -4.9 (-11.9, 2.7)
Iag3: -3.8 (-10.3, 3.2)
5-d mean: -1.3 (-9.9, 8.1)
Platelets, % change mean (103/|Jl)
lagO: -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Iag1: -0.4 (-2.1,1.6)
Iag2: 0.8 (-1.0, 2.4)
Iag3: 0.0 (-1.8,1.7)
5-d mean: -0.9 (-3.0,1.3)
Leukocytes, % change in mean
(103/mD
lagO: -1.9 (-3.8 to -0.1)
Iag1: -0.6 (-2.9,1.6)
Iag2: -0.6 (-3.2, 2.0)
July 2009
E-81
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Iag3: -2.3 (-4.6, 0.1)
5-d mean: -2.7 (-5.5, 0.1)
Erythrocytes, % change mean (10E/|Jl)
lagO: -0.1 (-0.5,0.3)
Iag1: -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Iag2: -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Iag3: -0.4 (-0.6, 0.3)
5-d mean: -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Hemoglobin, % change mean (g/dl)
lagO: -0.2 (-0.7, 0.4)
Iag1: -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Iag2: -0.1 (-0.9,0.7)
Iag3: -0.1 (-0.8,0.6)
5-d mean: -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6)
Reference: Ruckerl et al. (2007,
156931)
Period of Study: May 2003—Jul 2004
Location: Athens, Augsburg, Barcelona,
Helsinki, Rome, and Stockholm
Outcome: lnterleukin-6
(IL-6), fibrinogen, C-reactive protein (CRP)
Age Groups: 35-80 yrs
Study Design: Repeated measures I
longitudinal
N: 1003 Ml survivors
Statistical Analyses: Mixed-effect
models
Covariates: City-specific confounders
(age, sex, BMI)
long-term time trend and apparent
temperature
RH, time of day, day of week included if
adjustment improved model fit
Season: Long-term time trend
Dose-response Investigated? Used p-
splines to allow for nonparametric
exposure-response functions
Statistical Package: SAS v9.1
Pollutant: UFP (n/cm3)
Averaging Time: Hourly and 24 h (lag 0-
4, mean of lags 0-4, mean of lags 0-1,
mean of lags2-3, means of lags 0-3)
Mean (SD): Presented by city only
Percentiles: NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Monitoring Stations: Central monitoring
sites in each city
Copollutant: SO2
0s
NO
NO?
PM Increment: IQR
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
% change in mean blood markers per
increase in IQR of air pollutant.
IL-6
Lag (IQR): % change in GM (95%CI)
Lag 0(11852): 1.88 (-0.16, 3.97)
Lag 1 (11852):-0.67 (-2.56,1.25)
Lag 2 (11852): -2.12 (-4.03 to-0.17)
5-d avg (11003): -0.93 (-3.37,1.56)
Fibrinogen
Lag (IQR): % change in AM (95%CI)
Lag 0(11852): 0.40 (-0.40,1.19)
Lag 1 (11852): 0.11 (-0.69, 0.91)
Lag 2 (11852): 0.09 (-0.71, 0.90)
5-d avg (11003): 0.50 (-2.20, 3.20)
CRP
Lag (IQR): % change in GM (95%CI)
Lag 0(11852): 1.33 (-3.05, 5.90)
Lag 1 (11852):-1.52 (-4.39,1.45)
Lag 2 (11852):-1.63 (-6.70, 3.71)
5-d avg (11003):-0.08 (-3.78,3.75)
Reference: Pekkanen et al. (2002,
035050)
Period of Study: Winter 1998 to 1999
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Outcome: ST Segment Depression
(> 0.1 mV)
Age Groups: Study Design: Panel of
ULTRA Study participants
N: 45 Subjects, n - 342 biweekly
submaximal exercise tests, 72 exercise
induced ST Segment Depressions
Statistical Analysis: Logistic regression
I GAM
Pollutant: Ultrafine NC0.01-0.1 fjm
(n/cm3)
Averaging Time: 24 h
Median: 14,890
IQR: 9830
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant: NO2, CO, PM2.6, PMio-2.5,
PM1.ACP
PM Increment: IQR
Effect Estimate(s): NC0.01 -0.1: OR
- 3.14(1.56,6.32), lag 2
Notes: The effect was strongest for ACP
and PM2.E, which in two pollutant models
appeared independent. Increases in NO2
and CO were also associated with
increased risk of ST segment depression,
but not with coarse particles.
July 2009
E-82
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Peters et al. (2005, 095747) Outcome: Myocardial infarction
Also Peters et al, 2005 (2005,156859)
Period of Study: February 1999-July
2001
Location: Augsburg, Germany
Study Design: Case-crossover
N: 691 myocardial infarction patients
Statistical Analysis: Conditional logistic 24-h: Median
regression
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: Ultrafine (TNC) (n/cm3)
Averaging Time: 1 h: Median - 10,001
IQR: 7919
10,934
IQR: 6276
Copollutant: NO2, SO2, CO
PM Increment: Effect Estimate:
2 h lag: OR - 0.95
95% CI: 0.84,1.06
24-h mean, 2-day lag: OR - 1.04
95% CI: 0.90,1.20
Notes: Examined triggering for Ml at
various lags before Ml onset (up to 6 h
before Ml, up to 5 days before Ml). No
statistically significant increases in
lagged ultrafine particle concentration
were found.
Reference: Ruckerl et al. (2007,
091379)
Period of Study: Oct 2000—Apr 2001
Location: Erfurt, Germany
Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10): Soluble
CD40 ligand (sCD40L), platelets,
leukocytes, erythrocytes, hemoglobin
Age Groups: 50+ yrs
Study Design: Panel (12 re
measures at 2-wk intervals)
N: 57 male subjects with coronary
disease
Statistical Analyses: Fixed effects
linear regression models
Covariates: Long-term time trend,
weekday of the visit, temperature, RH,
barometric pressure
Season: Time trend as covariate
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS v8.2 and S-
Plus v6.0
Pollutant: UFP
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 12,602 (6455)
Percentiles: 25th: 7326
50th: 11,444
75th: 17,332
Range (Min, Max): 328,4908
Monitoring Stations: 1 site
Copollutant:
AP
PM2.6
PM10
NO
PM Increment: IQR (10,005
5-davg: 6,821)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
sCD40L, % change GM (pg/mL)
lagO: 7.1 (0.1,14.5)
lag 1:0.3 (-6.6, 8.6)
lag 2: 0.6 (-5.9, 8.6)
lag 3: -8.5 (-15.8,-0.5)
5-d mean: -0.7 (-7.6, 6.8)
Platelets, % change mean (103/|Jl)
lag 0:-1.8 (-3.4,-0.2)
lag 1:-1.1 (-2.9, 0.6)
lag 2: 1.0 (-2.9, 0.8)
lag 3: -2.4(4.5, -0.3)
5-d mean: -2.2 (-4.0, -0.3)
Leukocytes, [103/|Jl]
lag 0:-2.4 (-4.5, -0.2)
lag 1: -2.1 (-4.4,0.2)
lag 2: -0.2 (-2.4, 2.8)
lag 3:-1.5 (-4.4,1.4)
5-d mean: -1.6 (-4.1, 0.8)
'All units expressed in //gfm3 unless otherwise specified.
July 2009
E-83
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
E.I.2. Cardiovascular Emergency Department Visits and Hospital
Admissions
Table E-5. Short-term exposure-cardiovascular-ED/HA
PM
10
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Anderson et al. (2003,
054820)
Period of Study: 1992-1994
Location: London, United Kingdom
Outcome: Ischemic Heart Disease
Age Groups: 0-15,15-64, 65-74, 75-t
Study Design: Time series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: NR
Covariates: NR
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (min-max): NR
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: 10th—90th percentile
% Change in Daily IHD Admissions by
Age [CI]: 0-15 yrs: NR
15-64 yrs: 2.6(0.3,5]
65-74 yrs: 2.5(0.1,4.9]
75+ yrs: 2.2(0.2,4.6]
Notes: RRs are presented in graph form
showing little change with increasing age
(PM increment of 10 /yglm3). This article
is primarily a systematic literature review
of other studies.
Reference: Andersen et al. (2008,
189651)
Period of Study: May 2001 - December
2004
Location: Los Angeles and San Dii
counties, California
Outcome (ICD-10): CVD, including angina
pectoris (I20), myocardial infarction (121-
22), other acute ischemic heart diseases
(124), chronic ischemic heart disease
(125), pulmonary embolism (I26), cardiac
arrest (I46), cardiac arrhythmias (I48-
48), and heart failure (I50).
Age Groups: > 65 yrs (CVD and RD), 5-
18 years (asthma)
Study Design: Time series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM
Covariates: Temperature, dew-point
temperature, long-term trend,
seasonality, influenza, day of the week,
public holidays.
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: R (gam procedure,
mgcv package)
Lags Considered: Lag 0 -5 days, 4-day
pollutant avg (lag 0 -3) for CVD.
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD
median
IQR
99th percentile): 24 (14
21
16-29
72)
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation): NCtot:
r - 0.39
NC100: r - 0.28
NCa12:r - 0.02
NCa23: r - -0.12
NCa57: r - 0.45
NCa2i2: r = 0.63
PM2.6: r - 0.80
CO: r - 0.37
NO?: r - 0.35
NOx: r - 0.32
NOx curbside: r - 0.18
0a: r - -0.21
Other variables: Temperature: r - 0.12
Relative humidity: r - 0.05
PM Increment: 13 |Jg|m3 (IQR)
Relative risk (RR) Estimate [CI]:
CVD hospital admissions
(4-day avg, lag 0 -3), age 65+:
One-pollutant model: 1.03 [1.01-1.05]
Adj for NCtot: 1.04(1.02-1.06]
Adj for NCa2i2:1.05 [1.01-1.09]
RD hospital admissions
(5 day avg, lag 0 -4), age 65+:
One-pollutant model: 1.06 [1.02-1.09]
Adj for NCtot: 1.05 [1.01-1.10]
Adj for NCa2i2:1.04 [0.98-1.11]
Asthma hospital admissions
(6-day avg lag 0-5), age 5-18:
One-pollutant model: 1.02 [0.93-1.12]
Adj for NCtot: 1.01 [0.91-1.12]
Adj for NCa2i2: 0.94 [0.81-1.09]
Estimates for individual day lags reported
only in figure form (see notes):
Notes: Figure 2: Relative risks and 95%
confidence intervals per IQR in single day
concentration (0- to 5-day lag).
Summary of Figure 2: CVD: Positive,
marginally or statistically significant
associations at Lag 0—Lag 2.
July 2009
E-84
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Anderson et al. (2007,
156214)
Period of Study: 1199-12 04
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Outcome (ICD10): Hospital Admission,
CVD, including angina pectoris (I20),
myocardial infarction (121 - 22), other
acute ischemic heart diseases (I24),
chronic ischaemic heart disease (I25),
pulmonary embolism (I26), cardiac arrest
(I46), cardiac arrhythmias (I48 - 48), and
heart failure (I50).
Age Groups Analyzed: Age > 65
Study Design: Time series
N: 2192 days, 9 Hospitals
Statistical Analyses: Principal
Component Analysis and Constrained
Physical Receptor Model (COPREM),
Poisson regression, GAM,
Covariates: Season, day of the wk,
public holidays, influenza epidemics and
meteorology
Season: All year
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical package: R, gamfmgcv
Lags Considered: 0-6 days
Pollutant: Source specific PMio
components
Averaging Time: 24-h
Mean (SD): Percentiles: 25th: 16
50th (Median): NR
75th: 30
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation): PMio:
Biomass
r - 0.53
Secondary
r - 0.73
Oil
r - 0.57
Crustal
r - 0.37
Sea salt
r - 0.04
Vehicle
r - 0.02
Notes: Correlations between source
specific PMio components presented in
paper
PM Increment: IQR
RR Estimate
Respiratory disease (age > 65)
Single pollutant model:
PMio: 1.027 (1.013,1.042), IQR-14
PMio (other 5 sources): 1.045 (1.016,
1.074), IQR-13
Biomass: 1.040 (0.009,1.072), IQR-5.4
Secondary: 1.050 (1.021,1.081),
IQR-6.1
Oil: 1.035 (1.006,1.065), IQR-2.8
Crustal: 1.054 (1.028,1.081), IQR-1.8
Sea salt: 0.98 (0.947,1.017), IQR-2.2
Vehicle: 0.989 (0.949,1.032), IQR-0.6
Notes: 2 pollutant model results for PMio
with source specific components and
gases also presented in manuscript.
Reference: Baccarelli et al. (2007,
091310)
Period of Study: Jan 1995—Aug 2005
Location: Lombardia region, Italy
Outcome (ICD9 and ICD 10): Fasting and
postmethionine-load total homocysteine
(tHcy)
Age Groups: 11 -84 yrs
Study Design: Cross-sectional/Panel
N: 1,213 participants
Statistical Analyses: Generalized
additive models
Covariates: age, sex, BMI, smoking,
alcohol, hormone use, temperature, day
of the year, and long-term trends
Season: Adjusted for long-term trends to
account for season
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: R software v2.2.1
Pollutant: PMio (some TSP measures
used to predict PMio)
Averaging Time: Hourly concentrations
used to calculate 24-h moving averages
and 7-day moving averages
Mean (SD): NR
Percentiles: 25th: 20.1
50th: 34.1
75th: 52.6
Range (Min, Max): Max: 390.0
Monitoring Stations: 53 sites
Copollutant: CO, NO2
SO?
Os
PM Increment: IQR
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Estimates (%) per 32.5/yglm3 increase in
24-h moving avg of PMio
Homocysteine, fasting: 0.4 (-2.4, 3.3)
Homocysteine, postmethionine-load: (-1.5,
3.7)
Estimates (%) per 25.7m3 increase in 7-
day moving avg of PMio
Homocysteine, fasting: 1.0 (-1.9, 3.9)
Homocysteine, postmethionine-load: 2.0
(-0.6,4.7)
Estimates of effect (%) on fasting
homocysteine per IQR increase in 24-h
PMio levels
Among smokers: 6.2 (0.0,12.7)
Among non-smokers: -1.6 (-5.5, 2.5)
Estimates of effect (%) on
postmethionine-load homocysteine per
IQR increase in 24-h PMio levels
Among smokers: 6.0 (0.5,11.8)
Among non-smokers: -0.1 (-3.6, 3.5)
July 2009
E-85
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ballester et al. (2006,
088746)
Period of Study: 1995 ¦ 1999
Location: 5 Spanish cities: Granada,
Huelva, Madrid, Seville, Zaragoza
Outcome (ICD-9): All cardiovascular
disease (390-459), including all heart
diseases (410-414, 427, 428)
Age Groups: All ages
Study Design: Time series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAMs
Covariates: daily temp, barometric
pressure relative humidity
daily influenza incidence, day of the
week, holidays, unusual events (ex.
medical strikes), seasonal variation, trend
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: S-Plus GAM
function
Lags Considered: lag 0 -3 days, lag 0-1
avg
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (10-90th percentile): overall
mean NR.
City specific means
Granada: 43.2 (24.8, 62.6)
Huelva: 38.6(23.1,57.3)
Madrid: 35.7(21.4,54.4)
Seville: 41.9 (27.3, 57.6)
Zaragoza: 32.8 (17.3, 50.3)
Monitoring Stations: At least three
stations/city
(15+)
Copollutant (correlation): Summary of
the correlation coefficients between each
pair of pollutants within cities: BS:
r - 0.48
TSP: N/A
NO2: from r - 0.13 to r - 0.62 (median
r - 0.40)
SO2: from r - 0.20 to r - 0.51 (median
r - 0.46)
CO: from r - 0.34 to r - 0.45 (median
r - 0.37)
O3: from r - -0.07 to r - 0.16 (median
r - 0.11)
PM Increment: 10/yglm3
Relative risk [CI]: Relative risks are
expressed only in the form of figures (see
notes).
Percentage change in risk [CI]: All
cardiovascular diseases (avg of lags 0 -1):
0.91% [0.35,1.47]
Heart disease (avg of lags 0 -1)
1.56% [0.82, 2.31]
Notes: Relative risks for the single
pollutant models are expressed in
Figure 2.
Figure 2: Time sequence of the combined
association between PM10 and hospital
admissions for all CVD (A) and heart
disease (B).
Summary of results: Significant, positive
association of PM10 with both overall
CVD and heart disease hospitalizations at
Lag 0 and Lag 1.
Relative risks for two pollutant
models are expressed in Figure 3:
Figure 3: Combined estimates of the
association between hospital admissions
for heart diseases and air pollutants (avg
of lags 0-1
adjusted for CO, NO2, O3, or SO2)
Summary of results: Significant, positive
association remains after adjusting for
pollutants.
July 2009
E-86
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Bell et al. (2008, 091268)
Period of Study: 1995 ¦ 2002
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Outcome (ICD-9): Hospital admissions
for ischemic heart disease (410 ,411,
414), cerebrovascular disease (430—
437).
Age Groups: All
Study Design: Time series
N: 6,909 hospital admissions for
ischaemic heart diseases, 11,466 for
cerebrovascular disease.
Statistical Analyses: Poisson regression
Covariates: Day of the week, time,
apparent temperature, long-term trends,
seasonality
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: lags 0-3 days, avg of
lags 0-3
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (range
IQR): 49.1 (12.7-215.5
27.6)
Monitoring Stations: Taipei area: 13
monitors
Taipei City: 5 monitors
Monitors with correlations of 0.75 ¦
PMio: 12 monitors
Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: 28/yg/m3 (near IQR)
Percentage increase estimate [95%
CI]: Ischemic heart disease: Taipei area
(13 monitors): L0: 1.91 (-1.25,5.17)
L1: 0.39 (-2.73, 3.61)
L2: 1.80 (-1.33, 5.04)
L3: 2.01 (-1.14,5.26)
L03: 2.91 (-1.52,7.55)
Taipei City (5 monitors): L0: 2.08 (-1.04,
f°r 5.30)
L1: 0.43 (-2.64, 3.60)
L2: 2.17 (-0.92,5.36)
L3: 2.16 (-0.94, 5.36)
L03: 3.40(-1.19, 8.20)
Monitors with > - 0.75 between
monitor correlations (12 monitors): L0:
1.82 (-1.29, 5.03)
L1: 0.35 (-2.72, 3.52)
L2: 1.93(-1.15, 5.10)
L3: 1.93(-1.16, 5.12)
L03: 2.86 (-1.63, 7.54)
Cerebrovascular disease: Taipei area
(13 monitors): L0: -1.41 (-3.80,1.04)
L1:-1.95 (4.31, 0.48)
L2: 0.77 (-1.62,3.23)
L3: 2.64 (0.21,5.12)
L03: 0.01 (-3.33, 3.47)
Taipei City (5 monitors): L0: -1.27 (-3.64,
1.16)
L1:-2.13 (-4.47, 0.27)
L2: 0.85 (-1.52, 3.28)
L3: 2.52(0.13, 4.97)
L03:-0.07 (-3.53, 3.51)
Monitors with > - 0.75 between
monitor correlations (12 monitors): L0: -
1.34 (-3.70,1.07)
L1:-1.98 (-4.31, 0.40)
L2: 0.80 (-1.56, 3.22)
L3: 2.61 (0.22, 5.05)
L03: -0.02 (-3.40, 3.49)
July 2009
E-87
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Chan et al. (2007, 147787)
Period of Study: Apr 1997 - Dec 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Outcome: Cerebrovascular Emergency
Admissions
Age Groups: 50+ yrs
Study Design: time series
Statistical Analyses: GAM Poisosn
Regression
Covariates: year, month, day of week,
temperature, dew point
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 0-3d
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean (SD): 50.2(22.1)
Min: 16.0
Max: 325.4
IQR: 25.4
Monitoring Stations: 16
Copollutant: 0:i, CO, SO2, NO2, PM2.6
Co-pollutant Correlation
0s: 0.43
CO: 0.47
SO2: 0.59
NO?: 0.64
PM2.6: 0.61
PM Increment: Interquartile Range (25.4
j"g/m3)
Percent Change (Lower CI, Upper CI),
p-value:
Cerebrovascular Disease
Lag 0:1.001 (0.969,1.033)
Lag 1:0.999 (0.9787,1.020)
Lag 2:1.023 (0.989,1.057)
Lag 3:1.030 (1.011,1.049)
Lag 3 + 0s: 1.018(0.987,1.049)
Lag 3 + CO: 1.019(0.988,1.050)
Lag 3 + 0s + CO: 1.015(0.985,1.045)
Stroke
Lag 0:0.969 (0.897,1.041)
Lag 1:0.992 (0.918,1.066)
Lag 2:1.004 (0.993,1.015)
Lag 3:1.009 (0.988,1.030)
Ischaemic stroke
Lag 0:0.984 (0.932,1.036)
Lag 1:0.993 (0.939,1.047)
Lag 2: 0.989 (0.927,1.041)
Lag 3:1.042 (0.981,1.103)
Haemorrhagic stroke
Lag 0:0.966 (0.884,1.048)
Lag 1:0.990 (0.908,1.072)
Lag 2:1.002 (0.920,1.084)
Lag 3: 0.974 (0.902,1.046)
Reference: Chan et al. (2008, 093297)
Period of Study: 1995 ¦ 2002
Location: Taipei Metropolitan area,
Taiwan
Outcome (ICD-9): Emergency visits for
ischaemic heart diseases (410-411,
414), cerebrovascular diseases
(430-437), and C0PD (493, 496)
Age Groups: All
Study Design: Time series
N: NR
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): High dust events: Pre-dust
periods: 45.5 (17.6)
Asian dust events: 122.7 (24.4)
Low dust events: Pre-dust periods: 59.4
(31.0)
PM Increment: 25.4/yg/m3 (IQR)
OR [95% CI]: In environmental conditions
without dust storms (results only shown
for best-fitting model)
Lag 3 days: 1.023(1.003,1.041)
Statistical Analyses: Poisson regression Asian dust events: 61.1 (17.8)
models
Covariates: Year, month, day of week,
temperature, dew point temperature,
PM2.6, NO2
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: SAS version 8.0
Lags Considered: 0- to 7-day lags
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant: NR
July 2009
E-88
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Chanq et al. (2007,147621)
Outcome: CVD HA
Pollutant: PMio
PM Increment: Interquartile Range
(24.51 /yglm3)
Period of Study: 1997-2001
Age Groups: NR
Averaging Time: 24h
Odds Ratio (Lower CI, Upper CI):
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Study Design: case-crossover
Mean: 48.32
>20°C
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
Min: 14.44
Logistic Regression
25": 32.65
PM10: 1.085 (1.061,1.110)
Covariates: temperature, humidity
PM10+ SO2: 1.131 (1.103,1.161)
50": 42.80
Dose-response Investigated? No
PM10+NO2: 10.977 (0.950,1.006)
75": 57.16
Statistical Package: SAS
Max: 234.91
PM10+CO: 1.025 (0.999,1.052)
Lags Considered: 0-2d
PM10+ O3: 1.064 (1.039,1.090)
Monitoring Stations: 6
<20°C
Copollutant: 0:i, CO, SO2, NO2
PM10: 1.142 (1.105,1.180)
Co-pollutant Correlation
NR
PM10+ SO2: 1.235 (1.184,1.288)
PM10+ NO2: 1.148 (1.103,1.194)
PM10+CO: 1.165 (1.121,1.212)
PMio+Os: 1.142 (1.105,1.180)
Reference: D'lppoliti et al. (2003,
Outcome: Myocardial Infarction HA
Pollutant: TSP
PM Increment: Quartiles
074311)
Age Groups: 18+ yrs
Averaging Time: 24h
Odds Ratio (Lower CI, Upper CI):
Period of Study: Jan 1995 - Jun 1997
Study Design: case-crossover
Mean (SD): 66.9(19.7)
Lag 0-2d avg
Location: Rome, Italy
25": 54.7
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
Ql: 1.0 (ref)
Logistic Regression
50": 66.4
011:1.048 (0.957,1.148)
Covariates: temperature, humidity
QUI: 1.105 (1.007,1.214)
75": 78.4
Dose-response Investigated? No
IQR: 23.7
QIV: 1.132(1.023,1.253)
Statistical Package: NR
Monitoring Stations: 3
Various Lags
Lags Considered: 0-4d
Copollutant: CO, SO2, NO2
Lag 0:1.023 (1.004,1.042)
Co-pollutant Correlation
Lag 1:1.015 (0.996,1.034)
CO: 0.35
Lag 2:1.017 (0.999,1.035)
SO2: 0.29
Lag 3: 0.989 (0.974,1.003)
NO2: 0.38
Lag 4:1.001 (0.987,1.016)
Reference: Funq et al., (2005, 093262)
Outcome (ICD-9): Cardiovascular
Pollutant: PM10
PM Increment: 26/yg/m3
diseases
Period of Study: Nov 1,1995-Dec 31,
Averaging Time: 24 h
% Change in Daily Admission [CI]: Age
2000
(410-414,427-428)
<65
Mean (min-max): 38.0 (5-248)
Location: London, Ontario
Age Groups: < 65 yrs, 65+ yrs
SD - 23.5
Current day mean: 2.6 [-2.3,7.7]
Study Design: Time series
Monitoring Stations: 4
2-day mean: -1.2 [-7.2,5.1]
N: 12,947 CVD admissions
3-day mean: -3 [-9.6,4]
Copollutant (correlation): NO2:
Statistical Analyses: GAM with locally
r - 0.30
Age 65 +
weighted regression smoothers (LOESS)
SO2: r - 0.24
Current day mean: 0.9 [-2.3,4.2]
Covariates: Maximum and minimum
temp, humidity, day of the week,
CO: r - 0.21
2-day mean: -0.9 [-4.8,3.2]
seasonal cycles, secular trends
O3: r - 0.53
3-day mean: -0.1 [-4.4,4.5]
Season: NR
C0H: r - 0.29
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: S-Plus
Lags Considered: Current to 3-day mean
July 2009
E-89
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Hanigan et al (2008,
156518)
Period of Study: 1996-2005 (April-
November of each year)
Location: Darwin, Australia
Outcome: Daily emergency hospital
admissions for total cardiovascular (ICD-
9: 390-459
ICD-10:100-I99), ischemic heart disease
(ICD-9: 410-414
ICD-10:120-I25).
Age Groups: All
Study Design: Time series
N: 8,279 hospital admissions
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
generalized linear models
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD
range): 21.2 (8.2
55.2)
Monitoring Stations: NfA (see notes)
Copollutant: NR
Covariates: Indigenous status, time in
days, temperature, relative humidity, day
of the week, influenza epidemics, change
between ICD editions, holidays, yearly
population
Season: April-November (corresponding
to the dry season)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: R version 2.3.1
Lags Considered: 0-3
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Percent change [95% CI]: Overall CVD:
Lag 0 (indigenous): -3.78 [-13.4, 6.91]
Lag 0 (non-indigenous): -3.43 [-9.00,
2.49]
All unstratified associations either
negative or zero and not statistically
significant.
All other results of stratified analysis (by
indigenous status) reported in a figure
(see notes).
Notes: Figure 3: Associations between
hospitalizations for non-indigenous and
indigenous people with estimated ambient
PMio. Summary: Confidence intervals
were wide, but indigenous people
generally had stronger associations with
PMio than non-indigenous people. Daily
PMio exposure levels were estimated for
the population of the city from visibility
data using a previously validated models.
Reference: Hanigan et al (2008,
156518)
Period of Study: 1996-2005 (April-
November of each year)
Location: Darwin, Australia
Outcome: Cardiorespiratory Disease HA
(ICD 9: 390-519
ICD 10:100-99 & J00-99)
Age Groups: NR
Study Design: time series
N: 8279 events
Statistical Analyses: poisson regression
Covariates: indigenous status, time in
days, temperature, relative humidity, day
of the week, influenza epidemics, change
between ICD editions, holidays, yearly
population
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: R
Lags Considered: lags 0-3
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean (SD): 21.2 (8.2)
Range: 55.2
Monitoring Stations: 2 (monitored &
modeled)
Copollutant: NR
Co-pollutant Correlation
n/a
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3
Percent Change (Lower CI, Upper CI),
lag:
Tot. Cardiovascular, Indigenous: -3.43 (¦
9.00, 2.49), lag 0
Tot Cardiovascular, Non-Indigenous: -
3.78(-13.4, 6.91), lag 0
"figure 3. percent change in hospital
admissions per 10//g/m3 increase in PMio
Reference: Henrotin et al. (2007,
093270)
Period of Study: March 1994-
December 2004
Location: Dijon, France
Outcome: Ischemic and hemorrhagic
strokes
Age Groups: All
Study Design: Bi-directional case-
crossover
N: 1487 (ischemic) and 220
(hemorrhagic) stroke patients
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Covariates: Temperature, relative
humidity, influenza epidemics, holidays
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: STATA software
v. 8.2
Lags Considered: 0-3 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (min-max): 21.1 (2-103)
SD - 11.3
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
OR Estimate [CI]: Ischemic stroke
Same-day lag: 1.009(0.930,1.094]
1-day lag: 1.011 [0.998,1.094]
2-day lag: 0.960 [0.889,1.036]
3-day lag: 0.990 [0.919,1.066]
Hemorrhagic stroke
Same-day lag: 0.901 [0.730,1.111]
1-day lag: 1.014(0.828,1.241]
2-day lag: 1.100 [0.903,1.339]
3-day lag: 0.991 [0.881,1.212]
Notes: Ischemic stroke ORs were also
categorized into male and female, yielding
similar results (none were significant for
any lag days).
July 2009
E-90
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Issever et al. (2005, 097736) Outcome: Acute coronary syndrome
(ACS)
Period of Study: 1 Jan, 1997-31 Dec,
2001
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Age Groups: All
Study Design: Time series
N: 2889 ACS admissions
Statistical Analyses: Multiple stepwise
regression, Pearson correlation
Covariates: Humidity, temperature,
pressure
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean: NR
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation): ACS:
r - 0.37 (p - 0.003)
ACS controlled for temp: r - 0.29
(p - 0.02)
PM Increment: NR
RR Estimate [CI]: NR
Notes: This study focused more on the
seasonal change in acute coronary
syndrome admissions.
Reference: Jalaludin et al. (2006,
189416)
Period of Study: 1 Jan, 1997-31 Dec,
2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
Outcome (ICD-9): Cardiovascular disease
(390-459), cardiac disease (390-429),
ischemic heart disease (410-413) and
cerebrovascular disease or stroke (430-
438)
Age Groups: 65+ yrs
Study Design: Time series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: GAM, GLM
Covariates: Temperature, humidity
Season: Warm (Nov-Apr) and cool (May-
Oct)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: S-Plus
Lags Considered: 0-3
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (min-max): 16.8 (3.8-103.9)
SD - 7.2
Monitoring Stations: 14
Copollutant (correlation): Warm
BSP: r - 0.82
PM2.6: r - 0.89
O3: r - 0.59
NO?: r - 0.44;
CO: r - 0.31
SO2: r - 0.37
Cool
BSP: r - 0.75
PM2.6: r - 0.88
0s: r - 0.22
NO2: r - 0.67
CO: r - 0.48
SO2: r - 0.46
Other variables: Warm
Temp: r - 0.36
Rel humidity: r - -0.25
Cool
Temp: r - 0.13
Rel humidity: r - 0.05
PM Increment: 7.8/yglm3 (IQR)
Percent Change Estimate [CI]: All CVD
Same-day lag: 0.72 [-0.14,1.60]
Avg 0-1 day lag: 0.25
[-0.61,1.12]
Cool (same-day lag): 1.34(0.08,2.61]
Warm (same-day lag): 0.33 [-0.83,1.50]
Cardiac disease
Same-day lag: 1.15 [0.14,2.18]
Avg 0-1 day lag: 0.97
[-0.07,2.02]
Cool (same-day lag): 1.35 [-0.16,2.89]
Warm (same-day lag): 1.12 [-0.23,2.48]
Ischemic heart disease
Same-day lag: 0.59 [-0.95,2.17]
Avg 0-1 day lag: 0.61
[-0.95,2.20]
Cool (same-day lag): 0.33 [-2.00,2.72]
Warm (same-day lag): 0.79 [-1.23,2.85]
Stroke
Same-day lag: -1.66 [-3.48,0.20]
Avg 0-1 day lag: -2.05
[-3.88,0.20]
Cool (same-day lag): 0.46 [-2.17,3.17]
Warm (same-day lag): -3.49 [-5.97,-0.95]
Notes: All other lag-day ORs were
provided, yet none were significant.
Percent change in ED attendance was
also reported graphically
(Fig 1-5).
July 2009
E-91
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Johnston et al. (2007,
155882)
Period of Study: 2000, 2004, 2005
(April-November of each year)
Location: Darwin, Australia
Outcome (ICD-10): All cardiovascular
conditions (I00-I99), including ischemic
heart disease (I20-I25).
Age Groups: All
Study Design: Case-crossover
N: 2466 emergency admissions
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Covariates: Weekly influenza rates,
temperature, humidity, days with rainfall
> 5mm, public holidays, school holiday
periods (for respiratory conditions only)
Season: April-November (dry season)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 0-3
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Median (IQR, 10th—90th percentile,
range): 17.4 (13.6-22.3
10.3-27.7
1.1-70.0)
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3
OR Estimate [95% CI]: All respiratory
conditions: Ischemic heart disease:
Lag 0:0.82 [0.68-0.98]
Lag 0 (non-indigenous): 0.75 [0.61-0.93]
Lag 3 (indigenous): 1.71 [1.14-2.55]
Notes:
Figure 5: OR and 95% CI for hospital
admissions for cardiovascular conditions.
Summary: Negative associations in
overall study population and in non-
indigenous people. Positive associations
in Indigenous people at Lag 1, Lag 2, and
Lag 3.
Figure 6: OR and 95% CI for hospital
admissions for ischaemic heart disease.
Summary: Negative associations in
overall study population and non-
indigenous people. Positive association in
indigenous people.
Reference: Koken et al. (2003, 049466) Outcome (ICD-9): Acute myocardial
infarction (410.00-410.92), pulmonary
Period of Study: July and August, 1993- heart disease (416.0-416.9), cardiac
1997
Location: Denver, Colorado
dysrhythmias (427.0-427.9), congestive
heart failure (428.0)
Age Groups: 65+ yrs
Study Design: Time series
N: 298 days
Statistical Analyses: GLM, GEE
Covariates: Maximum temp and dew
point temp
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: Yes
Statistical Package: SAS (PR0C
GENM0D)
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (min-max): 24.2 (7.0-51.6)
SD - 6.25
Monitoring Stations: 3
Copollutant (correlation): NO2:
r - 0.56
SO2: r - 0.36
O3: r = 0.03
CO: r - 0.25
Other variables: Max temp: r - 0.38
Dew point temp: r - -0.24
PM Increment: 8.0/yglm3 (IQR)
Percent Change Estimate [CI]: No PM
data reported
Lags Considered: 0-4 days
July 2009
E-92
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Lanki et al„ (2006, 089788) Outcome (ICD-9): Acute myocardial
infarction
Period of Study: 1992-2000
Location: Augsburg, Barcelona, Helsinki,
Rome, and Stockholm
(410
ICD-10:121,122)
Age Groups: 35+ yrs, < 75 yrs, 75 +
yrs
Study Design: Time series
N: 26,854 hospitalizations
Statistical Analyses: GAM
Covariates: Temperature, barometric
pressure
Season: Warm (April-September) and
cold (October-March)
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: R package mgcv
0.9-5
Lags Considered: 0-3 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Median: Augsburg: 43.5
Barcelona: 57.4
Helsinki: 21.0
Rome: 48.5
Stockholm: 12.5
Copollutant (correlation): Augsburg
PNC: r - 0.53
CO: r - 0.56
NO?: r - 0.64
0s: r - 0.43
Barcelona: PNC: r - 0.38
CO: r - 0.44
NO?: r - 0.48
0s:r - 0.01
Helsinki: PNC: r - 0.45
CO: r - 0.21
NO?: r - 0.40
O3: r - 0.40
Rome: PNC: r - 0.32
CO: r - 0.41
NO?: r - 0.29
O3: r - 0.59
Stockholm: PNC: r - 0.06
CO: r - 0.41
NO?: r - 0.29
O3: r - 0.59
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Pooled Rate Ratio [CI]: All 5 cities (35 +
yrs)
Same-day lag: 1.003 [0.995,1.011 ]
1-day lag: 1.001 [0.990,1.011]
2-day lag: 1.002 [0.994,1.010]
3-day lag: 1.002 [0.991,1.013]
3 cities with hospital discharge register
(35+ yrs)
Same-day lag: 1.003(0.994,1.012]
1-day lag: 0.997 [0.988,1.006]
2-day lag: 1.003 [0.995,1.012]
3-day lag: 1.003 [0.986,1.020]
Warm season (35+ yrs)
Same-day lag: 1.006(0.990,1.022]
1-day lag: 1.000 [0.985,1.016]
2-day lag: 1.005 [0.990,1.020]
3-day lag: 1.010(0.995,1.025]
Cold season (35+ yrs)
Same-day lag: 1.001 [0.991,1.012]
1-day lag: 0.998 [0.987,1.009]
2-day lag: 1.001 [0.991,1.012]
3-day lag: 0.991 [0.981,1.002]
Age >75
Non-fatal
Same-day lag: 1.012 [0.995,1.029]
1-day lag: 1.000 [0.983,1.017]
2-day lag: 0.999 [0.982,1.017]
3-day lag: 1.001 [0.984,1.018]
Fatal
Same-day lag: 1.009 [0.985,1.034]
1-day lag: 0.998 [0.974,1.023]
2-day lag: 1.003 [0.978,1.028]
3-day lag: 1.018 [0.975,1.063]
Notes: Pooled rate ratios were also
provided for groups < 75 yielding similar
results to the overall 3-city data.
July 2009
E-93
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Lee et al. (2003, 095552)
Period of Study: 1 Dec, 1997-31 Dec,
1999
Location: Seoul, Korea
Outcome (ICD-10): Angina pectoris (I20),
acute/subsequent myocardial infarction
(121123), other acute ischemic heart
diseases (124)
Age Groups: All ages, 64+ yrs
Study Design: Time series
l\l: 822 days
Statistical Analyses: GAM with LOESS,
Pearson correlation
Covariates: Temperature, relative
humidity, day of the week
Season: Summer (Jun-Aug) and winter
Dose-response Investigated: Yes
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 0-6 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 64.0(31.8)
Monitoring Stations: 27
Copollutant (correlation): All year
SO?: r - 0.59
NO?: r - 0.74
O3: r - 0.11
CO: r - 0.60
Temp: r - -0.07
Humidity: r - 0.02
Summer
SO2: r - 0.61
NO2: r - 0.73
O3: r - 0.64
CO: r - 0.55
Temp: r - -0.01
Humidity: r - -0.11
PM Increment: 40.4/yg/m3 (IQR)
RR Estimate [CI]: All year
All ages: 0.99 [0.96,1.01]
64+ yrs: 1.05(1.01,1.10]
Summer
All ages: 1.03 [0.97,1.09]
64+ yrs: 1.09(1.00,1.19]
Two-pollutant model
CO (1 ppmlQI): 1.04(0.98,1.11]
0s (21.7 ppb 1011:1.07(1.03,1.11]
NO2 (14.6 ppb IQI):1.09(1.02,1.16]
SO2 (4.4 ppb): 0.98 (0.94,1.03]
Reference: Lee et al. (2008,192076)
Period of Study: 1996-2005
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Outcome: Congestive Heart Failure HA
(ICD 9: 428)
Age Groups: NR
Study Design: case-crossover
N: 18593 events
Statistical Analyses: conditional
logistic regression
Covariates: temperature, humidity
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: lags 0-2
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean: 49.94
Min: 11.33
25": 33.37
50": 45.05
75": 60.82
Max: 234.92
Monitoring Stations: 6
Copollutant: SO2, CO, NO2, O3
Co-pollutant Correlation
SO2: 0.52
CO: 0.67
NO2: 0.35
0s: 0.39
PM Increment: Interquartile
(27.45 /yglm3)
Odds Ratio (Lower CI, Upper CI):
Wf Hypertension: 1.23 (1.15,1.32)
W/o Hypertension: 1.20 (1.15,1.25)
W/ Diabetes: 1.20 (1.12,1.40)
W/o Diabetes: 1.21 (1.15,1.26)
Wf Dysrhythmia: 1.17 (1.08,1.27)
W/o Dysrhythmia: 1.22 (1.17,1.27)
WIC0PD: 1.21 (1.07,1.36)
W/oCOPD: 1.21 (1.16,1.25)
July 2009
E-94
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Larrieu et al. (2007, 093031)
Period of Study: 1998 ¦ 2003
Location: 8 French urban area: Bordeaux,
Le Havre, Lille, Lyon, Marseille, Paris,
Rouen, and Toulouse
Outcome (ICD-10): Hospital admissions
for cardiovascular disease (I00-I99),
cardiac disease (I00-I52), ischemic heart
disease (I20-I25), and stroke
(cerebrovascular disease: 160-64 and
transient ischemic attack: G45-G46).
Age Groups: All, and 65 +
Study Design: Time series
N: Statistical Analyses: generalized
additive Poisson regression
Covariates: Temperature, holidays,
influenza epidemic periods, long-term
trend, season, day of the week,
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: R 2.2.1
Lags Considered: 0 -1 day lag (mean)
Pollutant: PMio
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Averaging Time: 24 h
ERR [95% CI]:
Mean: Bordeaux: 21.0
CVD: All ages: 0.7(0.1,1.2]
Le Havre: 21.7
65+ years: 1.1 [0.5,1.7]
Lille: 22.1
Cardiac diseases: All ages: 0.8 [0.2,1.4]
Lyon: 24.6
65+ years: 1.5 [0.7, 2.2]
Marseille: 28.9
Ischemic heart diseases: All ages: 1.9
[0.8, 3.0]
Paris: 23.1
Rouen: 21.2
65+ years: 2.9 [1.5, 4.3]
Strokes: All ages: 0.2 [-1.6,1.9]
Toulouse: 21.8
65+ years: 0.8 [-0.9, 2.5]
Monitoring Stations: 32
Copollutant: NR
Reference: Le Tertre et al. (2002,
023746)
Period of Study: 1990-1997
Location: Barcelona, Birmingham,
London, Milan, the Netherlands, Paris,
Rome, and Stockholm
Outcome (ICD-9): Cardiac diseases (390-
429), ischemic heart disease (410-413),
and stroke (430-438)
Age Groups: < 65 yrs, 65+ yrs
Study Design: Time series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: GAM
Covariates: Long term trend, season,
days of the week, holidays, influenza
epidemics, temperature, and humidity
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: S-Plus
Lags Considered: 0-3 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): Barcelona: 55.7 (18.4)
Birmingham: 24.8 (13.1)
London: 28.4 (12.3)
Milan: 51.5(22.7)
Netherlands: 39.5 (19.9)
Paris: 22.7 (10.8)
Rome: 52.5 (12.9)
Stockholm: 15.5 (7.2)
Monitoring Stations: 1-12
Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Pooled Percent Increase [CI]: Cardiac
(all ages)
Fixed: 0.5 [0.3,0.7]
Random: 0.5 [0.2,0.8]
Cardiac (over 65)
Fixed: 0.7 [0.4,1.0]
Random: 0.7 [0.4,1.0]
IHD (< 65)
Fixed: 0.3 [-0.1,0.6]
Random: 0.3 [-0.2,0.7]
IHD (over 65)
Fixed: 0.6 [0.3,0.8]; Random: 0.8
[0.3,1.2]
Stroke (over 65)
Fixed: 0.0 [-0.3,0.3]; Random: 0.0 [¦
0.3,0.3]
Deaths: Cardiac: 0.5 [0.2,0.8]; Cardiac
(65+): 0.7(0.4,1.0]
IHD (65+): 0.8 [0.3,1.2]
Notes: Estimated percentage increases
are also provided by city for cardiac
admissions and ischemic heart disease in
Fig 1-3.
July 2009
E-95
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Mann et al. (2002, 036723) Outcome (ICD-9): Ischemic heart
(410-414), secondary congestive heart
Period of Study: 1988-1995
Location: South Coast Air Basin,
California
failure (sCHF) (428), and secondary
arrhythmia (sARR) (426, 427)
Age Groups: All, 40-59 yrs, > 60 yrs
Study Design: Time series
N: 54,863 IHD admissions
Statistical Analyses: GAM
Covariates: Temperature, day of the
week, relative humidity
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: S-Plus
Lags Considered: 0-5 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (min-max): 43.7 (0.22-251)
SD - 27.7
Monitoring Stations: 20
Copollutant (correlation):
r - 0.28
0s: r - 0.20
NO?: r - 0.36
Region 2: CO: r - 0.15
0s: r - 0.57
NO?: r - 0.53
Region 3: CO: r - 0.36
O3: r = 0.30
NO?: r - 0.46
Region 4: CO: r - 0.27
O3: r = 0.33
NO?: r - 0.50
Region 5: CO: r - 0.40
O3: r - 0.43
NO?: r - 0.53
Region 6: CO: r - 0.33
O3: r - 0.20
NO?: r - 0.42
Region 7: CO: r - 0.28
0s: r - 0.48
NO2: r - 0.60
n 1: CO:
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Percent Change in IHD Admissions
[CI]: Secondary ARR
Same-day lag: 0.59 [-0.71,1.91 ]
1-day lag: 0.46 [-0.86,1.80]
2-day lag: -0.04 [-1.37,1.31]
Secondary CHF
Same-day lag: -0.62 [-1.77,0.55]
1-day lag: -0.45 [-1.60,0.71]
2-day lag:-0.36 [-1.52,0.82]
No secondary diagnosis
Same-day lag: -0.25 [-1.23,0.75]
1-day lag: 0.04 [-0.97,1.06]
2-day lag: 0.18 [-0.82,1.20]
All IHD admissions: 0.19 [-0.576,0.955]
Ml admissions: -0.10 [-1.33,1.12]
Other acute IHD admissions: 0.36 [¦
0.87,1.60]
July 2009
E-96
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Metzgeret al. (2004,
044222)
Period of Study: August 1993-August
2000
Location: Atlanta Metropolitan area
(Georgia)
Outcome (ICD-9): Emergency visits for
ischemic heart disease (410-414),
cardiac dysrhythmias (427), cardiac
arrest (427.5), congestive heart failure
(428), peripheral vascular and
cerebrovascular disease (433-437, 440,
443-444,451-453), atherosclerosis
(440), and stroke (436).
Age Groups: All
Study Design: Time series
N: 4,407,535 emergency department
visits
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
generalized linear modeling
Covariates: Day of the week, hospital
entry and exit indicator variables,
federally observed holidays, temporal
trends, temperature, dew point
temperature
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 3-day moving avg,
lags 0 -7
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Median (10% - 90% range): 26.3 (13.2,
44.7)
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant (correlation): O3: r - 0.59
NO?: r - 0.49
CO: r - 0.47
SO2: r - 0.20
PM2.6: r - 0.84
PM 10-2.5: r - 0.59
UFP: r - -0.13
PM2.6 water-sol
metals: r - 0.74
PM2.6 sulfates: r - 0.74
PM2.6 acidity: r - 0.68
PM2.6 organic carbon: r - 0.69
PM2.6 elemental carbon: r - 0.56
oxygenated hydrocarbon: r - 0.58
Other variables: Temperature: r - 0.58
Dew point: r - 0.44
PM Increment: 10 //g/m3 (approximately
1 SD)
RR [95% CI]: For 3-day moving avg: All
CVD: 1.009 [0.998,1.019]
Dysrhythmia: 1.008 [0.989,1.029]
Congestive heart failure: 0.992 [0.968—
1.016]
Ischemic heart disease: 1.011 [0.992—
1.030]
Peripheral vascular and cerebrovascular
disease: 1.020 [0.999-1.043]
Notes: Results for Lags 0-7 expressed in
figures
Figure 1: RR (95% CI) for single-day lag
models for the association of ER visits for
CVD with daily ambient PM10.
Summary: Statistically significant
association at Lag 0. Positive but not
statistically significant association at Lag
1. Negative, statistically significant
association at Lag 7, and negative asso-
ciations at Lag 2 through Lag 6.
Reference: Middleton et al. (2008,
156760)
Period of Study: 1995-1998, 2000 ¦
2004
Location: Nicosia, Cyprus
Outcome: Hospital admissions for all
cardiovascular disease (ICD-10:100-I52).
Age Groups: All, also stratified by age
(< 15 vs. >15 years)
Study Design: Time series
Statistical Analyses: Generalized
additive Poisson models
Covariates: Seasonality, day of the
week, long- and short-term trend,
temperature, relative humidity
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: STATA SE 9.0, R
2.2.0
Lags Considered: Lag 0 -2 days
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD
median
5%- 95%
range): Cold: 57.6 (52.5
50.8
20.0-103.0
5.0-1370.6)
Warm: 53.4 (50.5
30.7
32.0-77.6
18.4-933.5)
Monitoring Stations: 2
Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3, and across
quartiles of increasing levels of PM10
Percentage increase estimate [CI]: All
age/sex groups (Lag 0): All admissions:
0.85(0.55,1.15)
Cardiovascular: 1.18 (-0.01, 2.37)
Nicosia residents (Lag 0):
Cardiovascular: 0.73 (-0.62, 2.09)
Males (Lag 0): All admissions: 0.96
(0.54,1.39)
Cardiovascular: 1.27 (-0.15, 2.72)
Females (Lag 0): All admissions: 0.74
(0.31,1.18)
Cardiovascular: 0.99 (-1.11, 3.14)
Aged < 15 years (Lag 0): All
admissions: 0.47 (-0.13,1.08)
Aged > 15 years (Lag 0): All
admissions: 0.98 (0.63,1.33)
July 2009
E-97
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Peel et al. (2007, 090442)
Period of Study: 1 Jan, 1993-31 Aug,
2000
Location: Atlanta, GA
Outcome (ICD-9): Ischemic heart
(410-414), dysrhythmia (427), congestive
heart failure (428), peripheral vascular
and cerebrovascular disease (433-437,
440,443,444,451-453)
Age Groups: All
Study Design: Case-crossover
N: 4,407,535 ED visits
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Covariates: Avg temp and dew point
temp
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: SAS v. 9.1
Lags Considered: 0-2 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): Daily levels: 27.9 (12.3)
Diff in case and control day avgs: 9.1
(7.5)
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
OR Estimate [CI]: All CVD: 1.010
[1.000,1.020]
IHD: 1.009(0.991,1.027]
Dysrhythmia: 1.011 [0.991,1.031]
PeripheralfCerebrovascular disease:
1.017(0.996,1.039]
CHF: 1.001 [0.978,1.024]
With comorbid hypertension
IHD: 1.003[0.973,1.034]
Dysrhythmia: 1.037 [0.988,1.089]
PeripheralfCerebrovascular disease:
1.024 [0.990,1.060]
CHF: 1.041 [0.999,1.084]
No comorbid hypertension
IHD: 1.013(0.991,1.036]
Dysrhythmia: 1.006 [0.985,1.028]
PeripheralfCerebrovascular disease:
1.013 [0.987,1.040]
CHF: 0.982 [0.955,1.010]
With comorbid diabetes
IHD: 1.022 [0.979,1.067]
Dysrhythmia: 1.049 [0.968,1.137]
PeripheralfCerebrovascular disease:
1.016 [0.965,1.069]
CHF: 1.029 [0.982,1.078]
No comorbid diabetes
IHD: 1.006 [0.987,1.026]
Dysrhythmia: 1.009 [0.989,1.029]
PeripheralfCerebrovascular disease:
1.018 [0.995,1.042]
CHF: 0.992 [0.966,1.019]
With comorbid COPD
IHD: 0.981 [0.921,1.044]
Dysrhythmia: 0.984 [0.889,1.088]
PeripheralfCerebrovascular disease:
1.086 [0.998,1.181]
CHF: 1.010 [0.954,1.069]
No comorbid COPD
IHD: 1.012(0.993,1.031]
Dysrhythmia: 1.012 [0.992,1.032]
PeripheralfCerebrovascular disease:
1.013 [0.991,1.035]
CHF: 0.999 [0.974,1.025]
July 2009
E-98
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Pope et al„ (2006, 091246) Outcome: Myocardial infarction or
unstable angina (ICD codes not reported)
Period of Study: 1994- 2004
Location: Wasatch Front area, Utah
Age Groups: All
Study Design: Case-crossover
N: 12,865 patients who underwent
coronary arteriography
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Covariates: Temperature and dew point
temperature
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 0- to 3-day lag, 2- to
4-day lagged moving averages
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD
maximum): Ogden: 28.5 (16.5
163)
SLC Hawthorne: 27.7 (17.4
162)
Provo/Orem, Lindom: 32.7 (21.1
240)
SLC AMC: 35.9 (20.4
161)
SLC North: 45.1 (25.1
199)
Monitoring Stations: 5
Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Percent increase in risk [95% CI]:
Results summarized in figure (see notes).
Notes: Figure 1: Percent increase in risk
(and 95% CI) of acute coronary events
associated with 10 /yglm3 of PMio for
different lag structures.
Summary of Figure 1: Positive,
statistically significant or marginally
significant associations between
association seen for Lag 0, Lag 1
and 2-, 3-, and 4-day moving averages.
Non-statistically significant associations
Reference: Santos et al. (2008,192004) Outcome: Cardiac Arrhythmia ER Visits
(ICD 10:145-I49)
Period of Study: Jan 1998 - Aug 1999
Location: Sao Paulo, Bazil
Age Groups: 17 + yrs
Study Design: time series
N: 3251 ER visits
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
Covariates: temperature, humidity,
seasonality
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: S-Plus
Lags Considered: lags 0-13
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean (SD): 48.64 (20.34)
Min: 18.68
Max: 137.76
Monitoring Stations: 14
Copollutant: SO2, CO, NO2, O3
Co-pollutant Correlation
SO2: 0.675*
CO: 0.580*
NO?: 0.781*
0s: 0.438*
*p < 0.01
PM Increment: Interquartile Range (22.2
j"g/m3)
Percent Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI):
PM10+ N02.C0: -5.6 (-12.7, 2.1)
PM10+ CO: -1.1 (-7.0,5.1)
PM10+ NO2: -2.4 (-9.4, 5.1)
Figure 1. PMio effects, reported as
percent increase, on arrhythmia ER visits
caused by interquartile range increases,
lags 0-6.
Figure 2. Relative risks and 95% CI for
arrhythmia ER visits according to the
division of air pollutant daily
concentrations in quintiles.
July 2009
E-99
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Tolbert et al. (2007,
090316)
Period of Study: 1993 ¦ 2004
Location: Atlanta Metropolitan area,
Georgia
Outcome (ICD-9): Combined CVD group,
including: Ischemic heart disease (410-
414), cardiac dysrhythmias (427),
congestive heart failure (428), and
peripheral vascular and cardiovascular
disease (433-437,440, 443-445, and
451-453).
Age Groups: All
Study Design: Time series
N: 10,234,490 ER visits (283,360 and
1,072,429 visits included in the CVD and
RD groups, respectively)
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
generalized linear models
Covariates: Long-term temporal trends,
season (for RD outcome), temperature,
dew point, days of week, federal
holidays, hospital entry and exit
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: SAS version 9.1
Lags Considered: 3-day moving avgflag
0-2)
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (median
IQR, range, 10th—90th percentiles):
26.6 (24.8
17.5-33.8
0.5-98.4
12.3-42.8)
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant (correlation): O3: r - 0.59
NO?: r - 0.53
CO: r - 0.51
SO2: r - 0.21
Coarse PM: r - 0.67
PM2.6: r - 0.84
PM2.6 SO4: r - 0.69
PM2.6 EC: r - 0.61
PM2.6 0C: r - 0.65
PM2.6 TC: r - 0.67
PM2.6 water-sol metals: r - 0.73
0HC: r - 0.53
PM Increment: 16.30/yglm3 (IQR)
Risk ratio [95% CI]: Single pollutant
models: CVD: 1.008 (0.997-1.020)
Reference: Tsai et al. (2003, 080133)
Period of Study: 1997-2000
Location: Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Outcome (ICD-9): Cerebrovascular
diseases (430-438), subarachnoid
hemorrhagic stroke (430), primary
intracerebral hemorrhage (431-432),
ischemic stroke (433-435), and others
(436-438)
Age Groups: All
Study Design: Case-crossover
N: 23,179 admissions
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Covariates: Temperature and humidity
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: Cumulative 0-2 days
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (min-max): 78.82 (20.50-217.33)
Monitoring Stations: 6
Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: 66.33/yg/m3 (IQR)
OR Estimate [CI]: Two-pollutant model
(all stroke admissions)
Primary intracerebral hemorrhage (PIH)
Adj for SO2:1.55(1.31,1.83]
Adj for NO2:1.28 [1.01,1.61];
Adj for CO: 1.45(1.20,1.74]
Adj for 0s: 1.56 [1.27,1.91]
Ischemic stroke (IS)
Adj for SO2:1.46(1.32,1.61]
Adj for NO2:1.16 [1.01,1.34]
Adj for CO: 1.35(1.21,1.51]
Adj for 0s: 1.51 [1.34,1.71]
Single-pollutant model
Temp >20°C
PIH: 1.54[1.31,1.81]
IS: 1.46[1.32,1.61]
Temp < 20°C
PIH: 0.82 [0.48,1.40]
IS: 0.97[0.65,1.44]
July 2009
E-100
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ulirsch et al. (2007, 091332) Outcome (ICD-9): CVD (390-429).
Age Groups: 65 +
Period of Study: November 1994-
March 2000
Location: Pocatello, Idaho and Chubbuck,
Idaho
Study Design: Time series
N: 39,347 admissions/visits
Statistical Analyses: Log-linear
generalized linear models
Covariates: Time, temperature, relative
humidity, influenza, day of the week
Season: All, and separate analyses were
performed for the all-age group for cool
months (October-March) vs. warm
months (April-September).
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: S-plus version 6.1
Lags Considered: 0- to 4-day lags, and
mean of days 0 -4
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (range
10th - 90th percentiles): 24.2 (3.0-
183.0
10.5-40.7)
Monitoring Stations: 4
Copollutant (correlation): NO2:
r - 0.47
Other variables: Correlation for PM10
between monitors: r - 0.42-0.87
PM Increment: 50 //g|m3, and
24.3/yglm3 (mean increase in PM10)
Mean percent of change (% change in
the mean number of daily admissions
and visits) [95% CI]:
For 24.3//gfm3 increase in PM10: All-
age RD/CVD: 3.7[1.3, 6.3]
All-age CVD (Lag 0): -0.02 [-5.9, 6.3]
All-age CVD (Lag 1): 1.9 [-4.1, 8.4]
All-age CVD (Lag 2): -3.1 [-9.1,3.4]
All-age CVD (Lag 3): 0.5 [-5.6, 6.9]
All-age CVD (Lag 4):-1.7 [-4.3, 0.9]
Lag 0-4 days: -0.5 [-8.0, 7.6]
For 50 /yglm3 increase in PM10 (single
pollutant models, CIs not given): All-age
respiratory disease: 8.4
All-age RD/CVD: 7.9
18-64 years RD: 7.2
All-age CVD (Lag 3): 1.0
All-age CVD (Lag 4): -3.6
All-age CVD (Lag 0-4):-1.1
Notes: Included urgent care visits as well
as emergency department visits and
hospital admissions.
Reference: Yang et al. (2007, 092847) Outcome: Congestive Heart Failure HA
(ICD 9: 428)
Period of Study: 1996 ¦ 2005
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Age Groups: NR
Study Design: case-crossover
N: 24,240 events
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
Covariates: temperature, humidity
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: lags 0-3
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean: 49.47
Min: 14.42
25": 33.08
50": 44.71
75": 60.10
Max: 234.91
Monitoring Stations: 6
Copollutant: NR
Co-pollutant Correlation
n/a
PM Increment: Interquartile
(27.02/yg/m3)
Odds Ratio (Lower CI, Upper CI):
Temp £20°C
PM10: 1.15(1.10-1.21)*
PM10+ SO2: 1.23 (1.17,1.30)*
PM10+NO2: 1.03 (0.97,1.10)
PM10+ CO2:1.09(1.03,1.15)*
PM10+ 03:1.10 (1.04,1.15)*
Temp < 20°C
PM10: 0.99(0.93,1.05)
PM10+SO2: 0.96 (0.89,1.03)
PM10+ NO?: 0.97 (0.90,1.04)
PM10+CO2: 0.96 (0.90,1.03)
PM10+ O3: 1.00 (0.94,1.05)
*p < 0.05
July 2009
E-101
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Yang et al. (2007, 092847) Outcome: Congestive Heart Failure HA
Period of Study: 1996 - 2001
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Age Groups: NR
Study Design: case-crossover
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
Covariates: NR
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: lags 0-3
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean (SD):
Index days
111.68(38.32)
Comparison days
55.43 (24.66)
Monitoring Stations: 7
Copollutant: NR
Co-pollutant Correlation
n/a
PM Increment: Index (> 125 /yglm3) vs.
Comparison (n125 //g/m3)
Relative Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI),
lag:
0.915(0.805,1.041), lag 0
1.114(0.993,1.250), lag 1
0.983 (0.873,1.106), lag 2
0.974 (0.870,1.090), lag 3
Reference: Villeneuve et al. (2006,
090191)
Period of Study: April, 1992 -March,
2002
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Outcome (ICD-9): Stroke (430-438),
including ischemic stroke (434-436),
hemorrhagic stroke (430,432), and
transient ischemic attacks (TIA) (435).
Age Groups: 65+ yrs
Study Design: Case-crossover
N: 12,422 visits
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Covariates: Temperature and relative
humidity
Season: summer (Apr-Sep), winter (Oct-
Mar)
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: SAS (PHREG)
Lags Considered: 0-, 1-, and 3-day
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): All year:
24.2(14.8)
Summer: 25.9 (16.4)
Winter: 22.6(12.9)
Monitoring Stations: 3
Copollutant (correlation):
All year
SO2: r - 0.19
NO?: r - 0.34;
CO: r - 0.30
03-mean: r - 0.07;
03-max: r - 0.22
PM2.6: r - 0.79
Summer
SO2: r - 0.18
NO2: r - 0.57;
CO: r - 0.38
03-mean: r - 0.20;
03-max: r - 0.40
PM2.6: r - 0.85
Winter
SO2: r - 0.27
NO2: r - 0.48;
CO: r - 0.53
03-mean: r - -0.26;
03-max: r - -0.09
PM2.6: r - 0.70
PM Increment: /yglm3 (IQR)
All year: 16.0
Summer: 17.5
Winter: 16.0
Adjusted OR Estimate [CI]: Acute
ischemic stroke
All year
Same-day lag: 0.98 [0.94,1.03]
1-day lag: 1.00 [0.96,1.05]
3-day lag: 0.99 [.93,1.05]
summer
Same-day lag: 0.93 [0.87,1.00]
1-day lag: 1.01 [0.94,1.08]
3-day lag: 0.96 [0.88,1.04]
Winter
Same-day lag: 1.04 [0.97,1.11]
1-day lag: 1.00 [0.94,1.06];
3-day lag: 1.05 [0.95,1.15]
Hemorrhagic stroke
All year
Same-day lag: 1.01 [0.90,1.12]
1-day lag: 1.03 [0.93,1.15]
3-day lag: 1.13(0.98,1.30]
summer
Same-day lag: 1.02 [0.88,1.20]
1-day lag: 1.07 [0.91,1.26]
3-day lag: 1.20 [0.98,1.46]
Winter
Same-day lag: 1.05 [0.90,1.22]
1-day lag: 1.04 [0.91,1.19]
3-day lag: 1.11 [0.90,1.37]
Transient cerebral ischemic attack
All year
Same-day lag: 0.96 [0.90,1.02]
July 2009
E-102
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
1-day lag: 0.99 [0.94,1.05]
3-day lag: 0.94 [0.87,1.01]
summer
Same-day lag: 0.97 [0.89,1.09]
1-day lag: 0.99 [0.91,1.08]
3-day lag: 0.94 [0.84,1.04]
Winter
Same-day lag: 0.95 [0.87,1.04]
1-day lag: 0.99 [0.92,1.07]
3-day lag: 0.93 [0.83,1.05]
Notes: Adjusted ORs are provided for an
IQR increase in the 3-day mean in Fig 1-4
for single and two-pollutant models.
July 2009
E-103
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: von Klot et al. (2005,
088070)
Period of Study: 1992-2001
Location: Augsburg, Germany
Barcelona, Spain
Helsinki, Finland
Rome, Italy
Stockholm, Sweden
Outcome (ICD-9): Acute myocardial
infarction (410
ICD-10:121-122), angina pectoris (411,
413
ICD-10:120,124), dysrhythmia (427
ICD-10:146.0,46.9,147-I49, R00.1,
R00.8), heart failure (428
ICD-10: 150)
Age Groups: 35+ yrs
Study Design: Cohort
N: 22,006 Ml survivors
Statistical Analyses: GAM, Spearman
correlation
Covariates: Temperature, dew point
temp, avg barometric pressure, relative
humidity
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: R
Lags Considered: 0-3 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (5th-95th percentile): Augsburg:
44.7 (16.8-81.4)
Barcelona: 52.2 (25.3-89.2)
Helsinki: 25.3 (9.5-57.6)
Rome: 51.1 (23.3-89.4)
Stockholm: 14.6(6.4-30.0)
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant (correlation): Augsburg
PNC: r - 0.52
CO: r - 0.57;
NO?: r - 0.64
0a: r - -0.32
Barcelona
PNC: r - 0.29
CO: r - 0.39;
NO?: r - 0.36
0a: r - -0.14
Helsinki
PNC: r - 0.46
CO: r - 0.21;
NO?: r - 0.40
0s: r - 0.02
Rome
PNC: r - 0.33
CO: r - 0.31;
NO?: r - 0.48
Oa: r - -0.22
Stockholm
PNC: r - 0.06
CO: r - 0.38;
NO?: r - 0.29
Os:r - 0.15
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Pooled RR Estimate [CI]:
All cardiac admissions: 1.021
[1.005,1.048]
Myocardial infarction: 1.026
[0.995,1.058]
Angina pectoris: 1.008 [0.986,1.032]
Notes: Rate ratios for 0-3 day lags are
provided in graphical form (Fig 1). Same-
day levels were significantly associated
with cardiac readmissions.
July 2009
E-104
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Wellenius et al. (2005,
087483)
Period of Study: 1 Jan, 1987-30 Nov,
1999
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Outcome (ICD-9): Congestive heart
failure (428.0-428.1)
Age Groups: 65+ yrs
Study Design: Case-crossover
N: 55,019 patients
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression, Pearson's pairwise
correlation
Covariates: Temperature, barometric
pressure, dew point
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 0-3 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (5th-95th percentile): 31.06 (8.89-
70.49)
SD - 20.10
Monitoring Stations: 17
Copollutant (correlation): CO: r - 0.57
NO?: r - 0.64
0s: r - 0.29
SO?: r - 0.51
PM Increment: 24/yg/m3 (IQR)
Percent Increase [CI]: Single-pollutant:
3.07[1.59,4.57]
Adj. for CO:-1.10 [-3.02,0.86]
Adj. for NOz: 0.52 [-1.46,2.53]
Adj. for 0s: 2.80(1.29,4.33]
Adj. for SO2: 2.18[0.37,4.02]
Percent Increase (with 10/yg/m3
increment)
1.27(0.66,1.88]
Reference: Wellenius et al. (2005,
088685)
Period of Study: 1 Jan, 1986-30 Nov,
1999
Location: Birmingham, Chicago,
Cleveland, Detroit, Minneapolis, New
Haven, Pittsburgh, Salt Lake City, Seattle
Outcome (ICD-NR): Ischemic stroke and
hemorrhagic stroke
Age Groups: 65+ yrs
Study Design: Case-crossover (time-
stratified)
N: 115,503 hospital admissions
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Covariates: Temperature and humidity
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: SAS (v.9) and R-
statistical package
Lags Considered: 0-2 lags
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 32.69 (19.75)
Monitoring Stations: NR
(data obtained from the US EPA)
Copollutant (correlation): CO: r - 0.43
NO?: r - 0.53
SO2: r - 0.39
Other variables: Temp: r - 0.22
PM Increment: 22.96//g|m3 (IQR)
Percent Increase [CI]: Ischemic (same-day
lag): 1.03 [0.04,2.04]
Hemorrhagic: -0.58 [-5.48,4.58]
Notes: Percent increase in rate for
ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke are
provided for each city in graphical form
(Fig A and B).
Reference: Wellenius et al.,(2006,
088748)
Period of Study: 1 Jan, 1986-30 Nov,
1999
Location: Birmingham, Chicago,
Cleveland, Detroit, Minneapolis, New
Haven, Pittsburgh, Salt Lake City, Seattle
Outcome (ICD-9): Congestive heart
failure (428)
Age Groups: 65+ yrs
Study Design: Case-crossover (time-
stratified)
N: 292,918 admissions
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Covariates: Temperature and barometric
pressure
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: SAS (v.9) and R-
statistical package
Lags Considered: 0-3 days
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24 h
Median: Overall: 28.3
Birmingham: 33.0
Chicago: 31.5
Cleveland: 34.5
Detroit: 29.5
Minneapolis: 24.0
New Haven: 22.
Seattle: 25.8
Monitoring Stations: NR
(data obtained from the US EPA)
Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: 10 //g|m3
Percent Increase [CI]: Same-day lag: 0.72
[0.35,1.10]
p-value - 0.0002
Notes: City-specific percent increases are
graphed in Fig 1 for same-day lag
showing a significant association in
Chicago, Detroit, Seattle, and the
summary values.
Percent increase in admission rate s are
provided for lag 0-3 days in Fig 2 where
same-day lag showed a significant
association.
July 2009
E-105
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Yang et al. (2004, 094376)
Period of Study: 1997-2000
Location: Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Outcome (ICD-9): Cardiovascular
diseases (410-429)
Age Groups: All
Study Design: Case-crossover
N: 29,661 admissions
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Covariates: Temperature and humidity
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: Cumulative 0-2 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Median (min-max): 78.82 (20.50-217.33)
Monitoring Stations: 6
Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: 66.33/yglm3 (IQR)
OR Estimate [CI]: Temp >25°C: 1.439
[1.316,1.573]
Temp < 25°C: 1.568(1.433,1.715]
Adj for SO2
Temp > 25°C: 1.460(1.333,1.599]
Temp < 25°C: 1.543(1.404,1.696]
Adj for NO2
Temp >25°C: 1.306 [1.154,1.478]
Temp < 25°C: 0.912 (0.809,1.028]
Adj for CO
Temp >25°C: 1.260 [1.144,1.388]
Temp < 25°C: 1.259 [1.128,1.406]
Adj for O3
Temp > 25°C: 1.086 [0.967,1.220]
Temp < 25°C: 1.703 [1.541,1.883]
Reference: Yang et al (2008,157160)
Period of Study: 1996 ¦ 2004
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Outcome (ICD-9): Congestive heart
failure (428)
Age Groups: All
Study Design: Case-crossover
N: 24,240 CHF hospital admissions
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Covariates: temperature, humidity
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: Cumulative lag 0-2
days
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (median, range, IQR):
49.47 (44.71,14.42-234.91, 33.08-
44.71) Monitoring Stations: 6
Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: 27.02/yg/m3 (IQR)
OR [95% CI]:
Single pollutant models: >20 °C: 1.15
[1.10-1.21]
<20 °C: 0.99 [0.93-1.05]
Adjusted for SO2: > 20 °C: 1.23 [1.17-
1.30]
<20 °C: 0.96 [0.89-1.03]
Adjusted for NO2: > 20 °C: 1.03 [0.97-
1.10]
<20 °C: 0.97 [0.90-1.04]
Adjusted for CO: >20 °C: 1.09 [1.03-
1.15]
<20 °C: 0.96 [0.90-1.03]
Adjusted for 0s: > 20 °C: 1.10 [1.04-
1.15]
<20 °C: 1.00[0.94-1.05]
July 2009
E-106
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Zanobetti and Schwartz
(2002,034821)
Period of Study: 1988-1994
Location: Cook county (Chicago), Illinois
Wayne county (Detroit), Michigan
Allegheny county (Pittsburgh),
Pennsylvania
and King county (Seattle), Washington
Outcome (ICD-9): Cardiovascular disease
(390-429) with/without diabetes (250)
Age Groups: 65-74 and 75+ yrs with
diabetes, 65-74 and 75+ yrs without
diabetes
Study Design: Time series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: GAM, meta-
regression
Covariates: Temperature, prior day's
temperature, relative humidity,
barometric pressure, day of the week
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: No
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Median (25-75th percentile): Chicago: 33
(23-46)
Detroit: 32 (21-49)
Pittsburgh: 30 (19-47)
Seattle: 27 (18-39)
Monitoring Stations: NR (obtained from
USEPA Aerometric Information Retrieval
System)
Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3
Percent Change [CI]: All four cities
< 75 (w/ diabetes): 1.6 [1.2,2.0]
75+ (w/ diabetes): 2.0(1.6,2.4]
< 75 (w/o diabetes): 0.9 [0.6,1.1]
75+ (w/o diabetes): 1.3 [1.0,1.5]
Chicago
< 75 (w/ diabetes): 1.9 [1.1,2.7]
75+ (w/ diabetes): 2.0(1.1,3.0]
< 75 (w/o diabetes): 0.7 [0.2,1.2]
75+ (w/o diabetes): 1.2 [0.8,1.7]
Detroit
< 75 (w/ diabetes): 1.3 [0.5,2.2]
75+ (w/ diabetes): 2.1 [1.0,3.1]
< 75 (w/o diabetes): 1.2 [0.7,1.7]
75+ (w/o diabetes): 1.2 [0.7,1.6]
Pittsburgh
< 75 (w/ diabetes): 1.8 [0.9,2.7]
75+ (w/ diabetes): 0.9 [-0.2,2.0]
< 75 (w/o diabetes): 0.6 [0.1,1.2]
75+ (w/o diabetes): 1.6 [1.2,2.1]
Seattle
< 75 (w/ diabetes): 1.9 [0.1,3.7]
75+ (w/ diabetes): 2.7 [0.7,4.8]
< 75 (w/o diabetes): 0.8 [0.0,1.6]
75+ (w/o diabetes): 0.9 [0.2,1.6]
Notes: Overall percent increases were
also provided for each city, yielding
similar results.
July 2009
E-107
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Zanobetti and Schwartz
(2005, 088069)
Period of Study: 1985-1999
Location: 21 U.S. cities (Birmingham,
Alabama
Boulder, Colorado
Canton, Ohio
Chicago, Illinois
Cincinnati, Ohio
Cleveland, Ohio
Colorado Springs, Colorado
Detroit, Michigan
Honolulu, Hawaii
Houston, Texas
Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota
Nashville, Tennessee
New Haven, Connecticut
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Provo-Orem, Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah
Seattle, Washington
Steubenville, Ohio
Youngstown, Ohio)
Outcome (ICD-9): Myocardial infarction
(410)
Age Groups: >65 yrs
Study Design: Case-crossover
N: 302,453 admissions
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Covariates: Temperature
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: Yes
Statistical Package: SAS (PROC
PHREG)
Lags Considered: 0-2 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Median: Ranged from 15.5-34.1 Avg
across all cities - 27
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3
Percent Increase [CI]: Ml only: 0.65
[0.3,1]
Previous C0PD admission: 1.3 [-0.1,2.8]
Monitoring Stations: 1 + (data obtained Secondary pneumonia diagnosis: 1.4
from USEPA's Aerometric Information 0.8,3.6]
Retrieval System)
Copollutant: NR
Notes: Figure 1 presents percent change
in Ml per lag day, showing same-day lag
to be significant. Figure 2 shows percent
change with/without other co-morbidities.
'All units expressed in/yglm3 unless otherwise specified.
July 2009
E-108
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table E-6. Short-term exposure-cardiovascular-ED/HA - PM102.5.
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Halonen et al. (2009,
180379)
Period of Study: 1998-2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Outcome: Cardiovascular
Hospitalizations & Mortality (ICD 10:100-
99)
Age Groups: 65+ yrs
Study Design: time series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: Poisson, GAM
Covariates: temperature, humidity,
influenza epidemics, high pollen episodes,
holidays
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: R
Lags Considered: lags 0-3 & 5d (0-4)
mean
Pollutant: PMio-2.b
Averaging Time: daily
Mean (SD): NR
Min: 0.0
ZS"1 percentile: 4.9
50"1 percentile: 7.5
TB" percentile: 12.1
Max: 101.4
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: PM <0.03, PMo.03-0.1, PMco.i
PM<0.10.29, PM2.6, CO, NO2
Co-pollutant Correlation
PM<0.03: 0.14
PM0.03-0.1: 0.28
PM <0.1: 0.24
PM<0.10.29: 0.20
PM2.6: 0.25
PM Increment: Interquartile Range
Percent Change (Lower CI, Upper CI):
All Cardiovascular Morality
Lag 0: -0.01 (-1.52,1.53)
Lag 1: -0.26 (-1.69,1.18)
Lag 2: -0.61 (-2.03, 0.83)
Lag 3: -0.57 (-1.98, 0.85)
5-d mean: -0.70 (-2.56,1.20)
Coronary Heart Disease HA
Lag 0:1.12 (-0.28, 2.55)
Lag 1: -0.38 (-1.68, 0.94)
Lag 2: 0.01 (-1.33,1.37)
Lag 3: -0.53 (-1.82, 0.78)
5-d mean: 0.23 (-0.29, 0.75)
Stroke HA
Lag 0:-1.33 (-3.26, 0.63)
Lag 1: -1.90 (-3.82, 0.07)*
Lag 2: -1.09 (-3.04,0.89)
Lag 3: -0.51 (-2.40,1.43)
5-d mean: -2.21 (-4.75,0.39)
Arrhythmia HA
Lag 0:0.57 (-1.33, 2.49)
Lag 1: -0.65 (-2.55,1.29)
Lag 2: 0.02 (-1.93, 2.00)
Lag 3:-1.34 (-3.26, 0.62)
5-d mean: -1.11 (-3.68,1.53)
*p<0.05, *p<0.10
July 2009
E-109
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Host et al. (2008,155852)
Period of Study: 2000 - 2003
Location: Six French cities: Le Havre,
Lille, Marseille, Paris, Rouen, and
Toulouse
Outcome (ICD-10): Daily hospitalizations
for all cardiovascular (I00-I99), cardiac
(I00-I52), and ischemic heart diseases
(I20-I25).
Age Groups: For cardiovascular
diseases: All ages, and restricted to a 65
years
Study Design: Time series
N: NR (Total population of cities:
approximately 10 million)
Statistical Analyses: Poisson regression
Covariates: Seasons, days of the week,
holidays, influenza epidemics, pollen
counts, temperature, and temporal trends
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: MGCV package in
R software (R 2.1.1)
Lags Considered: Avg of 0-1 days
Pollutant: PMio2.5
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean //g|m3 (5th -95th percentile): Le
Havre: 7.3 (2.5-14.0)
Lille: 7.9(2.2-13.7)
Marseille: 11.0(4.5-21.0)
Paris: 8.3(3.2-15.9)
Rouen: 7.0 (3.0-12.5)
Toulouse: 7.7 (3.0-15.0)
Monitoring Stations: 13 total: 1 in
Toulouse
4 in Paris
2 each in other cities
Copollutant (correlation): PM2 e:
Overall: r > 0.6
Ranged between r - 0.28 and r - 0.73
across the six cities.
PM Increment: 10 //g|m3, and an
18.8 //g/m3 increase (corresponding to an
increase in pollutant levels between the
lowest of the 5th percentiles and the
highest of the 95th percentiles of the
cities' distributions)
ERR (excess relative risk) Estimate [CI]:
For all cardiovascular diseases (10 //gf'nr1
increase): All ages: 0.5% [-1.2, 2.3]
> 65 years: 1.0% [-1.0,3.0]
For all cardiovascular diseases (18 //gfnv1
increase): All ages: 1.0% [-2.3,4.3]
a 65 years: 1.9% [-2.0, 5.9]
For cardiac diseases (10 //gfnv1 increase):
All ages: 0.1% [-1.9, 2.1]
a 65 years: 1.6% [-0.8,4.1]
For cardiac diseases (18.8 //g|m3
increase): All ages: 0.1% [-3.6,4.0]
>65 years: 3.1% [-1.5, 7.9]
For ischemic heart diseases (10 //g|m3
increase): All ages: 2.8% [-0.8, 6.6]
>65 years: 6.4% [1.6,11.4]
For ischemic heart diseases (18 /yglm3
increase): All ages: 5.4% [-1.5,12.8]
>65 years: 12.4 [3.1,22.6]
Reference: Metzgeret al. (2004,
044222)
Period of Study: August 1998-August
2000
Location: Atlanta Metropolitan area
(Georgia)
Outcome (ICD-9): Emergency visits for
ischemic heart disease (410-414),
cardiac dysrhythmias (427), cardiac
arrest (427.5), congestive heart failure
(428), peripheral vascular and
cerebrovascular disease (433-437, 440,
443-444,451-453), atherosclerosis
(440), and stroke (436).
Age Groups: All
Study Design: Time series
N: 4,407,535 emergency department
visits between 1993-2000 (data not
reported for 1998 ¦ 2000)
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
generalized linear modeling
Covariates: Day of the week, hospital
entry and exit indicator variables,
federally observed holidays, temporal
trends, temperature, dew point
temperature
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 3-day moving avg,
lags 0 -7
Pollutant: PM10 2.5
Averaging Time: 24 h
Median/yg/m3 (10% ¦ 90% range): 9.1
(4.4,16.2)
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation): PM10:
r - 0.59
O3: r - 0.35
NO?: r - 0.46
CO: r - 0.32
SO2: r - 0.21
PM2.6: r - 0.43
UFP: r - 0.13
PM2.6 water
soluble metals: r - 0.47
PM2.6 sulfates: r - 0.26
PM2.6 acidity: r - 0.23
PM2.6 organic carbon: r - 0.51
PM2.6 elemental carbon: r - 0.48
PM2.6 oxygenated hydrocarbon: r - 0.31
Other variables: Temperature: r - 0.20
Dew point: r - 0.00
PM Increment: 5 //gfnv1 (approximately
1 SD)
RR [95% CI]: For 3 day moving avg: All
CVD: 1.012(0.985,1.040]
Dysrhythmia: 1.021 [0.974,1.070]
Congestive heart failure: 1.020 [0.964—
1.079]
Ischemic heart disease: 0.994 [0.946—
1.045]
Peripheral vascular and cerebrovascular
disease: 1.022 [0.972-1.074]]
Results for Lags 0-7 expressed in figures
(see notes).
Notes: Figure 1: RR (95% CI) for single-
day lag models for the association of ER
visits for CVD with daily ambient PMio-
2.5.
Summary of Figure 1 results: Positive
association at Lag 0.
July 2009
E-110
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Peng et al. (2008,156850)
Period of Study: January 1,1999-
December 31, 2005
Location: 108 U.S. counties in the
following states: Alabama, Arizona,
California, Colorado, Connecticut, District
of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Idaho,
Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana,
Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts,
Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nevada,
New Hampshire, New Jersey, New
Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio,
Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode
Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas,
Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia,
Wisconsin
Outcome (ICD-9): Emergency
hospitalizations for: Cardiovascular
disease, including heart failure (428),
heart rhythm disturbances (426-427),
cerebrovascular events (430-438),
ischemic heart disease (410-414,429),
and peripheral vascular disease (440-
448).
Age Groups: 65 + years, 65-74, 75 +
Study Design: Time series
N: approximately 12 million Medicare
enrollees (3.7 million CVD and 1.4 million
RD admissions)
Statistical Analyses: Two-stage
Bayesian hierarchical models:
Overdispersed Poisson models for county-
specific data. Bayesian hierarchical
models to obtain national avg estimate
Covariates: Day of the week, age-
specific intercept, temperature, dew point
temperature, calendar time, indicator for
age of 75 years or older. Some models
were adjusted for PM2.6.
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: R version 2.6.2
Lags Considered: 0-2 days
Pollutant: PM10 2 E
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean //gfm3 (IQR): All counties assessed:
9.8(6.9-15.0)
Counties in Eastern US: 9.1 (6.6-13.1)
Counties in Western US: 15.4 (10.3-
21.8)
Monitoring Stations: At least 1 pair of
co-located monitors (physically located in
the same place) for PM10 and PM2.6 per
county
Copollutant (correlation): PM2 e:
r - 0.12
PM10: r - 0.75
Other variables: Median within-county
correlations between monitors: r - 0.60
PM Increment: 10 //g|m3
Percentage change [95% CI]: CVD: Lag 0
(unadjusted for PM2.6): 0.36 [0.05, 0.68]
Lag 0 (adjusted for PM2.6): 0.25 [-0.11,
0.60]
Notes: Effect estimates for PMio-2.5 (0-
2 day lags) are showing in Figures 2-5.
Figure 2: Percentage change in
emergency hospital admissions for CVD
per 10 /yglm3 increase in PM (single
pollutant model and model adjusted for
PM2.6 concentration)
Figure 4: Percentage change in
emergency hospital admissions rate for
CVD and RD per a 10 //g|m3 increase in
PMio-2.5 (0-2 day lags, Eastern vs.
Western USA)
Figure 5: County-specific log relative risks
of emergency hospital admissions for
CVD per 10/yglm3 increase in PMio-2.5 at
Lag 0 (unadjusted for PM2.6 and plotted
vs percentage of urbanicity)
No significant associations between
PMio-2.5 and cause-specific
cardiovascular disease.
Reference: Tolbert et al. (2007,
090316)
Period of Study: August 1998-
December 2004
Location: Atlanta Metropolitan area,
Georgia
Outcome (ICD-9): Combined CVD group,
including: Ischemic heart disease (410-
414), cardiac dysrhythmias (427),
congestive heart failure (428), and
peripheral vascular and cardiovascular
disease (433-437,440, 443-445, and
451-453)
Age Groups: All
Study Design: Time series
N: NR for 1998-2004. For 1993-2004:
10,234,490 ER visits (283,360 visits).
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
generalized linear models
Covariates: Long-term temporal trends,
temperature, dew point, days of week,
federal holidays, hospital entry and exit
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: SAS version 9.1
Lags Considered: 3-day moving avg (lag
0-2)
Pollutant: PMio-2.5
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (/L/g|m3) (median
IQR, range, 10th—90th percentiles): 9.0
(8.2
5.6-11.5
0.5-50.3
3.6-15.1)
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation): PM10:
r - 0.67
O3: r = 0.36
NO2: r - 0.48
CO: r - 0.38S02: r - 0.16
PM2.6: r - 0.47
PM2.6 SO4: r - 0.32
PM2.6 EC: r - 0.49
PM2.6 OC: r - 0.49
PM2.6 TC: r - 0.51
PM2.6 water-sol metals: r - 0.50
OHC: r - 0.41
PM Increment: 5.89 /yglm3 (IQR)
Risk ratio [95% CI]: CVD: 1.004 (0.990-
1.019)
'All units expressed in/yglm3 unless otherwise specified.
July 2009
E-111
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table E-7. Short-term exposure - cardiovascular-ED/HA - PM2.5 (including PM components/sources)
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Andersen et al. (2008,
189651)
Period of Study: May 2001 - December
2004
Location: Los Angeles and San
counties, California
Outcome (ICD-10): CVD, including angina
pectoris (I20), myocardial infarction (121-
22), other acute ischemic heart diseases
(124), chronic ischaemic heart disease
(125), pulmonary embolism (I26), cardiac
arrest (I46), cardiac arrhythmias (I48-
48), and heart failure (I50). RD, including
chronic bronchitis (J41-42), emphysema
(J43), other chronic obstructive pul-
monary disease (J44), asthma (J45), and
status asthmaticus (J46). Pediatric
hospital admissions for asthma (J45) and
status asthmaticus (J46).
Age Groups: > 65 yrs (CVD and RD),
5-18 years (asthma)
Study Design: Time series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM
Covariates: Temperature, dew-point
temperature, long-term trend,
seasonality, influenza, day of the week,
public holidays, school holidays (only for
5-18 year olds), pollen (only for pediatric
asthma outcome)
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: R statistical
software (gam procedure, mgcv package)
Lags Considered: Lag 0-5 days, 4-day
pollutant avg (lag 0-3) for CVD, 5-day avg
(lag 0-4) for RD, and a 6-day avg (lag 0-5)
for asthma.
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean |jg/m3 (SD
median
IQR
99th percentile): 10 (5
9
7-12
28)
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation):
NCtot: r - 0.40
NC100: r - 0.29
NCa12:r - 0.07
Nca23: r - -0.25
NCa57:r - 0.51
NCa2i2: r = 0.82
PMio: r - 0.80
CO: r - 0.46
NO?: r - 0.42
NO,: r - 0.40
NOxCurbside: r - 0.28
0a: r - -0.20
Other variables:
Temperature: r - -0.01
Relative humidity: r - 0.21
PM Increment: 5 [Jg/nr1 (IQR)
Relative risk (RR) Estimate [CI]: CVD
hospital admissions (4 day avg, lag 0 -3),
age 65+: One-pollutant model: 1.03
[1.01-1.06]
Adj for NCtot: 1.03(1.01-1.06]
RD hospital admissions (5 day avg, lag 0 -
4), age 65+:
One-pollutant model: 1.00 [0.95-1.00]
Adj for NCtot: 1.00 [0.95-1.06]
Asthma hospital admissions (6 day avg
lag 0-5), age 5-18:
One-pollutant model: 1.15 [1.00-1.32]
Adj for NCtot: 1.13(0.98-1.32]
Estimates for individual day lags reported
only in figure form (see notes):
Notes: Figure 2: Relative risks and 95%
confidence intervals per IQR in single day
concentration (0-5 day lag). Summary:
CVD: Marginally significant association at
Lag 0. RD: No statistically or marginally
significant associations. Positive
associations at Lag 4-5.Asthma: Wide
confidence intervals make interpretation
difficult. Positive associations at Lag 1,
2, 3.
July 2009
E-112
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ballester et al. (2006,
088746)
Period of Study: 1995 ¦ 1999
Location: 6 Spanish cities: Barcelona,
Bilbao, Pamplona, Valencia, Vigo,
Zaragoza
Outcome (ICD-9): The number of daily
emergency admissions with primary diag-
nosis for all cardiovascular disease (390-
459) and heart diseases (410-414, 427,
428)
Age Groups: All ages
Study Design: Time series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAMs
Covariates: daily temperature,
barometric pressure, and relative
humidity
daily influenza incidence, day of the
week, holidays, unusual events (ex.
medical strikes), seasonal variation, trend
of the series
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: S-Plus GAM
function
Lags Considered: 0-3 days, 0- to 1 -day
avg
Pollutant: Black smoke (BS)
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean //g/m3 (10-90th percentile): Overall
mean NR.
City specific means
Barcelona: 35.0 (19.4, 53.0)
Bilbao: 18.5(8.8,31.0)
Pamplona: 7.4 (2.3,13.0)
Valencia: 40.3 (20.3, 66.4)
Vigo: 79.4(43.9,122.3)
Zaragoza: 40.4 (23.8, 61.3)
Monitoring Stations: NR (at least three
stations per city)
Copollutant (correlation): Summary of
the correlation coefficients between each
pair of pollutants within cities:
PMio: r - 0.48
TSP: from r - 0.16 to r - 0.69
(median r - 0.43)
NO2: from r - 0.23 to r - 0.69
(median r - 0.48)
SO2: from r - 0.09 to r - 0.59
(median r - 0.24)
PM Increment: 10/yglm3
Relative risk [CI]: Relative risks are
expressed only in the form of figures (see
notes).
Percentage change in risk [CI]: All
cardiovascular diseases (avg of lags 0 -1)
0.24% [-0.18, 0.67]
Heart disease (avg of lags 0 -1) 0.71%
[0.13,1.29]
Notes: Relative risks for the single
pollutant models are expressed in Figure
2. Figure 2: Time sequence of the
combined association between BS and
hospital admissions for all CVD (A) and
heart disease (B). Summary: Significant,
positive association of TSP with both
overall CVD and heart disease
hospitalizations at Lag 0.
Relative risks for two pollutant models
are expressed in Figure 3: Combined
estimates of the association between
hospital admissions for heart diseases
and air pollutants (avg of lags 0-1
adjusted for CO, NO2, O3, or SO2).
Summary: Significant, positive
association remains after adjusting for
NO2, O3, and SO2. Association remains
positive but becomes marginally
significant after adjusting for CO.
CO: from r - 0.62 to r - 0.69
(median r - 0.69)
O3: from r - -0.43 to r - -0.06
(median r - -0.16)
July 2009
E-113
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ballester et al. (2006,
088746)
Period of Study: 1993 ¦ 1999
Location: 7 Spanish cities: Barcelona,
Bilbao, Cartagena, Castellon, Gijon,
Oviedo, Valencia
Outcome (ICD-9): The number of daily
emergency admissions with primary diag-
nosis for all cardiovascular disease (390-
459) and heart diseases (410-414, 427,
428)
Age Groups: All ages
Study Design: Time series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAMs
Covariates: daily temperature,
barometric pressure, and relative
humidity
daily influenza incidence, day of the
week, holidays, unusual events (ex.
medical strikes), seasonal variation, trend
of the series
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: S-Plus GAM
function
Lags Considered: 0-3 days, 0- to 1 -day
avg
Pollutant: TSP
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean /yglm3 (10-90th percentile): overall
mean NR.
City specific means
Barcelona: 51.8 (29.4, 78.8)
Bilbao: 58.3 (30.3, 92.3)
Cartagena: 54.9 (32.5, 79.9)
Castellon: 60.4 (32.0, 92.1)
Gijon: 77.4(47.4,118.3)
Oviedo: 76.0 (48.3,111.8)
Valencia: 61.0(44.1,80.7)
Monitoring Stations: NR (at least three
stations per city)
Copollutant (correlation): Summary of
the correlation coefficients between each
pair of pollutants within cities: BS: from r
- 0.16 to r - 0.69
(median r - 0.43)
PMio: NA
NO2: from r - -0.13 to r - 0.65
(median r - 0.48)
SO2: from r - 0.06 to r - 0.69
(median r - 0.31)
CO: from r - 0.06 to r - 0.59
(median r - 0.47)
O3: from r - -0.27 to r - 0.07
(median r - -0.03)
PM Increment: 10/yglm3
Relative risk [CI]: Relative risks are
expressed only in the form of figures (see
notes).
Percentage change in risk [CI]: All
cardiovascular diseases: 0.07% [-0.23,
0.36]
Heart disease 0.45% [0.04, 0.86]
Notes: Relative risks for the single
pollutant models are expressed in Figure
2.
Figure 2: Time sequence of the combined
association between TSP and hospital
admissions for all CVD (A) and heart
disease (B).
Summary of results: Positive, marginally
significant association of TSP with
overall CVD at Lag 0. Positive,
statistically significant relation between
TSP and heart disease hospitalizations at
Lag 0.
Relative risks for two pollutant models
are expressed in Figure 3:
Figure 3: Combined estimates of the
association between hospital admissions
for heart diseases and air pollutants (avg
of lags 0-1
adjusted for CO, NO2, O3, or SO2).
Summary of results: Small positive
significant or marginally significant
associations between TSP and general
CVD and heart disease hospitalizations
remain constant after adjustment for CO,
NO2, O3, or SO2.
July 2009
E-114
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Bell et al. (2008, 091268)
Period of Study: 1995 ¦ 2002
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Outcome (ICD-9): Hospital admissions
for ischemic heart disease (410, 411,
414), cerebrovascular disease (430—
437), asthma (493), and pneumonia
(486).
Age Groups: All
Study Design: Time series
N: 6,909 hospital admissions for
ischaemic heart diseases, 11,466 for
cerebrovascular disease, 19,966 for
pneumonia, and 10,231 for asthma
Statistical Analyses: Poisson regression
Covariates: Day of the week, time,
apparent temperature, long-term trends,
seasonality
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: lags 0-3 days, mean of
lags 0-3
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean //g/m3 (range
IQR): 31.6(0.50-355.0
20.2)
Monitoring Stations: 2
Copollutant (correlation): NR
PM Increment: 20/yg/m3 (near IQR)
Percentage increase estimate [95% CI]:
Ischemic heart disease: L0: 3.48 (-0.39,
7.51)
L1: 3.55 (-0.30, 7.56)
L2: 3.32 (-0.50, 7.29)
L3: 2.80 (-1.04, 6.79)
L03: 8.38 (2.28,14.84)
Cerebrovascular disease: L0: -2.22 (¦
50.2, 0.67)
L1:-1.30 (-4.08,1.55)
L2: 0.24 (-2.49, 3.040
L3: 1.21 (-1.41,3.90)
L03:-1.45 (-5.58, 2.87)
Asthma: L0: 0.46 (-2.41, 3.42)
L1:-1.36 (-4.33,1.71)
L2: -0.83 (-3.67, 2.10)
L3: -0.78 (-3.63, 2.16)
L03: -1.75 (-6.21, 2.92)
Pneumonia: L0: 0.06 (-2.74, 2.94)
L1: 0.34(-2.446, 3.20)
L2: -0.59 (-3.38, 2.29)
L3:-0.44 (-3.22, 2.41)
L03: -0.61 (-4.87, 3.85)
Reference: Bell et al. (2008, 091268)
Period of Study: 1999 ¦ 2005
Location: 202 US counties
Outcome (ICD-9): Heart failure (428),
heart rhythm disturbances (426-427),
cerebrovascular events (430-438),
ischemic heart disease (410-414,429),
peripheral vascular disease (440-449),
C0PD (490-492), respiratory tract
infections (464 ¦ 466, 480 ¦ 487)
Age Groups: 65 +
Study Design: Time series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: Two-stage
Bayesian hierarchical model to find
national avg
First stage: Poisson regression (county-
specific)
Covariates: day of the week,
temperature, dew point temperature,
temporal trends, indicator for persons
75+ years, population size
Season: All, June-August (Summer),
September-November (Fall), December-
February (Winter), March-May (Spring)
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 0-2 day lags
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (/L/g|m3): Descriptive information
presented in Figure S2 (boxplots):
IQR: 8.7 /yglm3
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant (correlation): NR
PM Increment: 10 //g|m3
Percent increase [95% PI]:
Cardiovascular admissions:
Lag 0 (all seasons): 0.80 [0.59-1.01]
Lag 0 (winter, national): 1.49 [1.09-
1.89]
Lag 0 (winter, northeast): 2.01 [1.39-
2.63]
Lag 0 (winter, southeast): 1.06 [-0.07—
2.21]
Lag 0 (winter, northwest): 0.85 [-4.11—
6.07]
Lag 0 (winter, southwest): 0.76 [-0.25—
1.79]
Lag 0 (spring, national): 0.91 [0.47-1.35]
Lag 0 (spring, northeast)
0.95(0.32-1.58]
Lag 0 (spring, southeast): 0.75 [-0.26—
1.78]
Lag 0 (spring, northwest): -0.07 [-12.40—
13.98]
Lag 0 (spring, southwest): 1.78 [-0.87—
4.51]
Lag 0 (summer, national): 0.18 [-0.23—
0.58]
_Lag_OJsummerjiortheastHL^
July 2009
E-115
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
1.02]
Lag 0 (summer, southeast): -0.67 [-1.60—
0.26]
Lag 0 (summer, northwest): -1.55 [¦
15.22-14.31]
Lag 0 (summer, southwest): -1.20 [-4.90—
2.65]
Lag 0 (autumn, national): 0.68 [0.29—
1.07]
Lag 0 (autumn, northeast): 1.03 [0.48—
1.58]
Lag 0 (autumn, southeast): 0.17 [-0.72—
1.07]
Lag 0 (autumn, northwest): -0.67 [-6.96—
6.05]
Lag 0 (autumn, southwest): 0.30 [-0.98—
1.59]
Lag 1 (all seasons): 0.07 [-0.12-0.26]
Lag 1 (winter): 0.56 [0.16-0.96]
Lag 1 (spring): -0.10 [-0.58-0.39]
Lag 1 (summer): -0.16 [-0.54—0.22]
Lag 1 (autumn): 0.04 [-0.28-0.35]
Lag2 (all seasons): [0.06 [-0.12—0.23]
Lag 2 (winter): 0.27 [-0.12-0.65]
Lag 2 (spring): 0.19 [-0.23—0.60]
Lag 2 (summer): -0.12 [-0.50—0.26]
Lag 2 (autumn): 0.02 [-0.30-0.34]
Respiratory admissions: Lag 0 (all
seasons): 0.22 [-0.12-0.56]
Lag 0 (winter, national): 1.05 [0.29—
1.82]
Lag 0 (winter, northeast): 1.76 [0.60-
2.93]
Lag 0 (winter, southeast): 0.59 [-1.35—
2.58]
Lag 0 (winter, northwest): -0.07 [-6.74—
7.08]
Lag 0 (winter, southwest): 0.03 [-1.25—
1.34]
Lag 0 (spring, national): 0.31 [-0.47—
1.11]
Lag 0 (spring, northeast): 0.34 [-0.66—
1.34]
Lag 0 (spring, southeast): -0.06 [-1.77-
1.68]
Lag 0 (spring, northwest): -8.52 [-25.62—
12.51]
Lag 0 (spring, southwest): 1.87 [-2.00—
5.90]
Lag 0 (summer, national): -0.62 [-1.33—
0.09]
Lag 0 (summer, northeast): -0.8 [-1.65-
0.07]
Lag 0 (summer, southeast): -0.15 [-1.88—
1.61]
July 2009
E-116
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Lag 0 (summer, northwest): 0.25 [¦
21.46-27.96]
Lag 0 (summer, southwest): 0.64 [-5.38-
7.04]
Lag 0 (autumn, national): 0.02 [-0.63—
0.67]
Lag 0 (autumn, northeast): -0.01 [-0.87—
0.85]
Continued on next page
Continued from previous page
Lag 0 (autumn, southeast): -0.58 [-2.06—
0.91]
Lag 0 (autumn, northwest): -1.38 [¦
11.84-10.32]
Lag 0 (autumn, southwest): 1.77 [-0.73—
4.33]
Lag 1 (all seasons): 0.05 [-0.29-0.39]
Lag 1 (winter): 0.50 [-0.27-1.27]
Lag 1 (spring): -0.24 [-1.01 -0.53]
Lag 1 (summer): 0.28 [-0.39-0.95]
Lag 1 (autumn): 0.15 [-0.49-0.79
Lag 2 (all seasons): 0.41 [0.09-0.74]
Lag 2 (winter, national): 0.72 [0.01 —
1.43]
Lag 2 (winter, northeast): 0.79 [-0.21 —
1.80]
Lag 2 (winter, southeast): 0.4 [¦ 1.45,
2.27]
Lag 2 (winter, northwest): -0.06 [-6.52-
6.85]
Lag 2 (winter, southwest): 1.2 [-0.10-
2.52]
Lag 2 (spring, national): 0.35 [-0.29—
0.99]
Lag 2 (spring, northeast): 0.04 [-0.88—
0.97]
Lag 2 (spring, southeast): 0.75 [-0.82—
2.34]
Lag 2 (spring, northwest): 2.29 [-14.26—
22.03]
Lag 2 (spring, southwest): 1.05 [-2.18-
4.39]
Lag 2 (summer, national): 0.57 [-0.07—
1.23]
Lag 2 (summer, northeast): 0.77 [-0.01 —
1.56]
| Lag 2 (summer, southeast): -0.52 [¦
2.07-1.06]
Lag 2 (summer, northwest): 0.74 [¦
18.73-24.86]
Lag 2 (summer, southwest): 2.41 [-2.61 —
7.69]
Lag 2 (autumn, national): 0.39 [-0.22—
1.01]
iLa£^JautumMiorthe^
July 2009
E-117
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
1.07]
Lag 2 (autumn, southeast): 0.14 [-1.29—
1.59]
Lag 2 (autumn, northwest): -0.74 [¦
10.08-9.58]
Lag 2 (autumn, southwest): 0.971-1.36-
3.36]
Reference: Bell et al. (2009,191007)
Period of Study: 1999-2005
Location: 168 US Counties
Outcome: CVD hospital admissions
Study Design: Retrospective Cohort
Covariates: socio-economic conditions,
long term temperature
Statistical Analysis: Bayesian
hierarchical model
Age Groups: £65
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean (SD) Unit: NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Increment: 20% of the population
acquiring air conditioning
Percent Change (95% CI) in
community-specific PM health effect
estimates for CVD hospital
admissions
Any AC, including window units
Yearly health effect: -4.3 (-72.7-4.2)
Summer health effect: -148 (-327-31.1)
Winter health effect:-80.0 (-182-22.0)
Central AC
Yearly health effect: -42.5(-63.4-21.6)
Summer health effect: -79.5 (-143 -15.7)
Winter health effect: -41.9 (-124-40.0)
July 2009
E-118
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Bell et al. (2009,191997)
Period of Study: 1999-2005
Location: US
Outcome: Cardiovascular HA
Age Groups: 65 +
Study Design: time series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: Bayesian
Hierarchical Regression
Covariates: time trend, day of week,
seasonality, dew point, temperature
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 0-2
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: daily
Mean:
EC: 0.715
Ni: 0.002
V: 0.003
Min:
EC: 0.309
Ni: 0.003
V: 0.001
Max:
EC: 1.73
Ni: 0.021
V: 0.010
Interquartile Range:
EC: 0.245
Ni: 0.001
V: 0.001
Interquartile Range of Percents:
EC: 1.7
Ni: 0.01
V: 0.01
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: Al, NH4+, As, Ca, CI, Cu,
EC, 0MC, Fe, Pb, Mg. Ni, NOs-, K, Si,
Na+, S04-, Ti, V, Zn
Co-pollutant Correlation
Ni, V: 0.48
V, EC: 0.33
Ni, EC: 0.30
Note: Pollutant concentrations available
for all fractions of PM2.6
PM Increment: Interquartile Range in
the fraction of PM2.6
Percent Increase in PM Health Effect
(Lower CI, Upper CI), lag
EC: 25.8(4.4,47.2), lag 0
EC + Ni: 14.0 (-7.6, 35.5), lag 0
EC + V: 14.9(-7.8, 37.6), lag 0
EC+ V, HS education: 15.0 (3.3, 26.8),
lag 0
EC+ V, median income: 15.8 (4.1, 27.5),
lag 0
EC+ V, racial composition: 14.2 (2.8,
25.6), lag 0
EC+ V, percent living in urban area: 14.7
(3.1,26.3), lagO
EC + V, population: 13.6 (2.2, 25.0), lag
0
EC + Ni, V: 11.9 (-10.4,43.2), lag 0
Ni: 19.0 (9.9, 28.2), lag 0
Ni + EC: 17.3(7.7, 26.9), lag 0
Ni + V: 15.5 (4.1, 26.9), lag 0
Ni + EC, V: 14.9(3.4, 26.4), lag 0
V: 27.5 (10.6, 44.4), lag 0
V + EC: 23.1 (4.9,41.4), lag 0
V+ Ni: 10.9 (-9.6, 31.5), lag 0
V + EC, Ni: 8.1 (-13.3,29.5), lag 0
EC: 11.8 (-69.2, 92.8), lag 1
EC: 21.0(-46.6, 88.6), lag 2
Ni: 20.6 (-15.5, 56.7), lag 1
Ni:-2.3 (-32.5, 27.9), lag 2
V: 34.0 (-31.2, 99.1), lag 1
V: 8.0 (-46.8, 62.7), lag 2
Percent HS education: -17.4 (-46.8,
11.9), lagO
Median income: 21.3 (-20.0, 62.5), lag 0
Percent black: 26.9 (-15.8, 69.6), lag 0
Percent living in urban area: 34.4 (-29.0,
97.8), lagO
Population: -4.3 (-13.3, 4.8), lag 0
Notes: Interquartile ranges in percent HS
education, median income, percent black,
percent living in urban area, and
population are 5.2 %, $9,223,17.3%,
11.0%, and 549,283 respectively.
July 2009
E-119
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Chan et al. (2007, 147787)
Period of Study: Apr 1997 - Dec 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Outcome: Cerebrovascular Emergency
Admissions
Age Groups: 50+ yrs
Study Design: time series
Statistical Analyses: GAM Poisosn
Regression
Covariates: year, month, day of week,
temperature, dew point
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 0-3d
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean (SD): 31.5 (16.0)
Min: 15.6
Max: 200.6
IQR: 19.7
Monitoring Stations: 16
Copollutant: 0:i, CO, SO2, NO2, PM10
Co-pollutant Correlation
0s: 0.33
CO: 0.44
SO2: 0.51
NO2: 0.50
PM10: 0.61
PM Increment: Interquartile Range (19.7
j"g/m3)
Percent Change (Lower CI, Upper CI),
p-value:
Cerebrovascular Disease
Lag 0:1.006 (0.993,1.019)
Lag 1:1.002 (0.990,1.014)
Lag 2:1.015 (0.978,1.052)
Lag 3:1.021 (1.005,1.037)
Lag 3 + 0s: 1.009 (0.987,1.031)
Lag 3 + CO: 1.014(0.993,1.035)
Lag 3 + 0s + CO: 1.009 (0.987,1.031)
Stroke
Lag 0:0.931 (0.831,1.031)
Lag 1:0.936 (0.845,1.027)
Lag 2: 0.931 (0.820,1.042)
Lag 3: 0.991 (0.969,1.013)
Ischaemic stroke
Lag 0:0.981 (0.907,1.055)
Lag 1:0.994 (0.920,1.078)
Lag 2: 0.960 (0.885,1.035)
Lag 3:1.059 (0.984,1.134)
Haemorrhagic stroke
Lag 0:0.870 (0.740,1.010)
Lag 1:0.882 (0.761,1.003)
Lag 2: 0.909 (0.810,1.008)
Lag 3: 0.921 (0.830,1.012)
Reference: Chan et al. (2008, 093297)
Period of Study: 1995 ¦ 2002
Location: Taipei Metropolitan area,
Taiwan
Outcome (ICD-9): Emergency visits for
ischaemic heart diseases (410-411,
414), cerebrovascular diseases (430-
437), and C0PD (493, 496)
Age Groups: All
Study Design: Time series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: Poisson regression
Covariates: Year, month, day of week,
temperature, dewpoint temperature,
PM10, NO2
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: SAS version 8.0
Lags Considered: 0- to 7-day lags
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean//g/m3 (SD): NR
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation): NR
PM Increment: 19.7//g|m3 (IQR)
OR [95% CI]: In environmental conditions
without dust storms (results only given
for best-fitting model)
Lag 6 days: 1.024(1.004,1.044)
Reference: Delfino et al, (2008,156390)
Outcome: Cardiovascular hospital
Pollutant: PM2.6
Increment: 10 //g/m3
admissions
Period of Study: 10/1/2003-
Averaging Time: Hourly
Relative Rate (Min CI, Max CI)
1111512003
Study Design: Time series
Mean (SD) Unit by county:
All Cardiovascular
Location: Southern California
Statistical Analysis: Poisson regression
with GEE
Los Angeles
All Periods: 0.996 (0.989-1.003)
Age Groups: All
Before Fires: 27.2 (12.4) //g/m3
Pre-Wildfire: 0.992 (0.976-1.009)
During Fires: 54.1 (21.0) //g/m3
Wildfire: 1.008 (0.999-1.018), p - 0.104
July 2009
E-120
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
After Fires: 15.9 (5.5) //g|m3
Orange
Before Fires: 23.2 (9.6)//g/m3
During Fires: 64.3 (26.5) //g|m3
After Fires: 15.5 (10.2) //g|m3
Riverside
Before Fires: 32.7 (14.7) //g/m3
During Fires: 42.1 (25.5) //g/m3
After Fires: 16.9 (10.2) //g|m3
San Bernadino
Before Fires: 35.7 (16.6) //g/m3
During Fires: 45.3 (28.7) //g|m3
After Fires: 18.5 (8.3) //g|m3
San Diego
Before Fires: 18.5 (6.7) //g/m3
During Fires: 76.1 (66.6)//g/m3
After Fires: 14.2 (7.2) /yglm3
Ventura
Before Fires: 18.4 (8.3) /yglm3
During Fires: 50.1 (50.5) //g/m3
After Fires: 12.9 (4.3) /yglm3
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Post-Wildfire: 0.991 (0.964-1.019), p -
0.955
Ischaemic Heart Disease
All Periods: 0.991 (0.980-1.003)
Pre-Wildfire: 0.990 (0.963-1.017)
Wildfire: 0.117 (0.990-1.024), p - 0.313
Post-Wildfire: 0.989 (0.950-1.030), p -
0.976
Congestive Heart Failure
All Periods: 0.989 (0.974-1.004)
Pre-Wildfire: 0.978(0.942-1.015)
Wildfire: 1.016 (0.933-1.039), p - 0.096
Post-Wildfire: 0.969 (0.914-1.027), p -
0.791
Cardiac Dysrhythmia
All Periods: 0.980 (0.962-0.998)
Pre-Wildfire: 0.979(0.935-1.025)
Wildfire: 0.989 (0.961-1.017), p - 0.721
Post-Wildfire: 0.976 (0.912-1.044), p -
0.934
Cerebrovascular Disease and Stroke
All Periods: 1.019(1.004-1.035)
P re-Wildfire: 1.015(0.980-1.052)
Wildfire: 1.016 (0.997-1.036), p - 0.971
Post-Wildfire: 1.044 (0.987-1.104), p -
0.379
Relative Rate (Min CI, Max CI) in
relation to pre-wildfire period (1)
All Cardiovascular: Wildfire, unadjusted
for PM2.b: 0.958 (0.920-0.997)
Wildfire, adjusted for PM2.6: 0.947
(0.902-0.994)
Post-wildfire, unadjusted for PM2.6: 1.061
(1.006-1.119)
Post-wildfire, adjusted for PM2.6:1.053
(0.994-1.114)
Ischaemic Heart Disease: Wildfire,
unadjusted for PM2.6: 0.913 (0.852-
0.978)
Wildfire, adjusted for PM2.6: 0.905
(0.832-0.985)
Post-wildfire, unadjusted for PM2.6: 1.029
(0.943-1.123)
Post-wildfire, adjusted for PM2.6:1.029
(0.936-1.131)
Congestive Heart Failure: Wildfire,
unadjusted for PM2.6: 0.981 (0.817-
0.972)
Wildfire, adjusted for PM2.6: 0.911
(0.819-1.014)
Post-wildfire, unadjusted for PM2.6: 1.113
(0.997-1.242)
_^ostj/vMdfirei_adiusted^or_PM2;BM^1_05__
July 2009
E-121
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
(0.982-1.244)
Cardiac Dysrhythmia: Wildfire, unadjusted
for PMz.b: 0.968 (0.874-1.072)
Wildfire, adjusted for PM2.6: 0.964
(0.851-1.093)
Post-wildfire, unadjusted for PM2.6: 1.089
(0.949-1.251)
Post-wildfire, adjusted for PM2.6:1.057
(0.914-1.223)
Cerebrovascular Disease and Stroke:
Wildfire, unadjusted for PM2.6:1.066
(0.981-1.159)
Wildfire, adjusted for PM2.6:1.017
(0.922-1.123)
Post-wildfire, unadjusted for PM2.6: 1.013
(0.907-1.132)
Post-wildfire, adjusted for PM2.6:1.013
(0.902-1.138)
Reference: Dominici et al. (2006,
088398)
Period of Study: 1999 ¦ 2002
Location: 204 US counties, located in:
Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas,
California, Colorado, Connecticut,
Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida,
Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana,
Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana,
Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts,
Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi,
Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, New
Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North
Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon,
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South
Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah,
Virginia, Washington, West Virginia,
Wisconsin
Outcome (ICD-9: Daily counts of hospital
admissions for primary diagnosis of heart
failure (428), heart rhythm disturbances
(426-427), cerebrovascular events (430-
438), ischemic heart disease (410-414,
429), peripheral vascular disease (440-
448), chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease (490-492), and respiratory tract
infections (464-466, 480-487).
Age Groups: >65 years
Study Design: Time series
N: 11.5 million Medicare enrollees
Statistical Analyses: Bayesian 2-stage
hierarchical models.
First stage: Poisson regression (county-
specific)
Second stage: Bayesian hierarchical
models, to produce a national avg
estimate
Covariates: Day of the week,
seasonality, temperature, dew point
temperature, long-term trends
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: R statistical
software version 2.2.0
Lags Considered: 0-2 days, avg of days
0-2
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (/^g/m3) (IQR): 13.4 (11.3-15.2)
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Other variables: Median of pairwise
correlations among PM2.6 monitors within
the same county for 2000: r - 0.91 (IQR:
0.81-0.95)
PM Increment: 10 //g|m3 (Results in
figures
see notes)
Percent increase in risk [95% PI]:
Cerebrovascular disease (Lag 0): Age
65 + : 0.81 [0.30,1.32]
Age 65-74: 0.91 [0.01,1.82]
Age 75 + : 0.80 [0.21,1.38]
Peripheral vascular disease (Lag 0): Age
65 + : 0.86 [-0.06,1.79]
Age 65-74:1.21 [-0.26, 2.67]
Age 75+: 0.86 [-0.39, 2.11]
Ischemic heart disease (Lag 2): Age 65+:
0.44 [0.02,0.86]
Age 65-74: 0.37 [-0.22, 0.96]
Age 75+: 0.52 [-0.01,1.04]
Heart rhythm disturbances (Lag 0): Age
65 + : 0.57 [-0.01,1.15]
Age 65-74: 0.46 [-0.63,1.54]
Age 75 + : 0.72 [0.02,1.42]
Heart failure (Lag 0): Age 65 + : 1.28
[0.78,1.78]
Age 65-74: 1.21 [0.35, 2.07]
Age 75 + : 1.36 [0.78,1.94]
COPD (Lag 0): Age 65 +: 0.91 [0.91,
1.64]
Age 65-74:0.42 [-0.64,1.48]
Age 75 + : 1.47 [0.54, 2.40]
Respiratory tract infection: Age 65+:
0.92 [0.41,1.43]
Age 65-74: 0.93 [0.04,1.82]
Age 75 + : 0.92 [0.32,1.53]
Annual reduction in admissions
attributable to a 10 //g|m3 reduction in
daily PM2.6 level (95% PI):
Cerebrovascular disease: Annual number
of admissions: 226,641
July 2009
E-122
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Annual reduction in admissions: 1836
[680, 2992]
Peripheral vascular disease: Annual
number of admissions: 70,061
Annual reduction in admissions: 602 [-42,
1254]
Ischemic heart disease: Annual number of
admissions: 346,082
Annual reduction in admissions: 1523
[69, 2976]
Heart rhythm disturbances: Annual
number of admissions: 169,627
Annual reduction in admissions: 967 [-17,
1951]
Heart failure: Annual number of
admissions: 246,598
Annual reduction in admissions: 3156
[1923,4389]
COPD: Annual number of admissions:
108,812
Annual reduction in admissions: 990
[196,1785]
Respiratory tract infections: Annual
number of admissions: 226,620
Annual reduction in admissions: 2085
[929, 3241]
Notes: Figure 2: Point estimates and 95%
posterior intervals of the % change in
admissions rates per 10 //g/m3 (national
avg relative rates) for single lag (0,1, and
2 days) and distributed lag models for 0
to 2 days (total) for all outcomes.
Summary: Positive significant or
marginally significant associations
between PM2.6 and cerebrovascular
disease at Lag 0
peripheral vascular disease at Lags 0 and
2
ischemic heart disease at Lag 2
heart rhythm disturbances at Lag 0
heart failure at Lag 0, Lag 2, and Lags 0 -
2
COPD at Lag 0, Lag 1, and Lags 0-2
and respiratory tract infections at Lag 2
and Lags 0-2.
Figure 3: Point estimates and 95%
posterior intervals of the % change in
admission rates per 10 //gf'nv1 (regional
relative rates). Summary: For
cardiovascular diseases, all estimates in
the Midwestern, Northeastern, and
Southern regions were positive, while
estimates in the other regions (South,
West, Central, Northwest) were close to
0. For respiratory disease, there were
larger effects in the Central,
Southeastern, Southern, and Western
regions than in the other regions.
Figure 4: Point estimates and 95%
posterior intervals of the % change in
admission per 10 /yglm3 (Eastern vs.
Western regions): Summary: All estimates
for cardiovascular outcomes were
July 2009
E-123
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
positive in the US Eastern region but not
in the US Western region. The estimates
for respiratory tract infections were
larger in the Western region than in the
Eastern region. The estimates for CCPD
were positive in the both regions.
Reference: Halonen et al. (2009,
180379)
Period of Study: 1998-2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Outcome: Cardiovascular
Hospitalizations & Mortality (ICD 10:100-
99)
Age Groups: 65+ yrs
Study Design: time series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: Poisson, GAM
Covariates: temperature, humidity,
influenza epidemics, high pollen episodes,
holidays
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: R
Lags Considered: lags 0-3 & 5d (0-4)
mean
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: daily
Mean (SD): NR
Min: 1.1
25"1 percentile: 5.5
SO"1 percentile: 9.5
75"1 percentile: 11.7
Max: 69.5
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: PM <0.03, PMo.03-0.1, PMco.i
PM<0.10.29, PM2.B-10, CO, NO2
Co-pollutant Correlation
PM<0.03: 0.14
PM0.03-0.1: 0.48
PM <0.1: 0.35
PM<0.10.29: 0.88
PM2.E-10: 0.25
PM Increment: Interquartile Range
Percent Change (Lower CI, Upper CI):
All Cardiovascular Morality
LagO: 0.73( 0.66, 2.13)
Lag 1: 0.74(-0.63, 2.13)
Lag 2: 0.74( 0.62, 2.11)
Lag 3: 0.06 (-1.29,1.43)
5-d mean: 0.87 (-0.94, 2.70)
Coronary Heart Disease HA
Lag 0:-0.17 (-1.5.0,1.18)
Lag 1: -0.03 (-1.31,1.26)
Lag 2: -0.63 (-1.87, 0.62)
Lag 3: 0.48 (-0.78,1.76)
5-d mean: 0.80 (-0.94, 2.58)
Stroke HA
Lag 0: -0.99 (-2.78, 0.84)
Lag 1:0.02 (-1.74,1.82)
Lag 2: -1.38 (-3.13, 0.40)
Lag 3: -0.17 (-1.92,1.61)
5-d mean: -0.78 (-3.10,1.60)
Arrhythmia HA
LagO: 0.82 (-1.03, 2.68)
Lag 1:0.18 (-1.58,1.97)
Lag 2: -0.09 (-1.82,1.67)
Lag 3: -0.48 (-2.22,1.29)
5-d mean: 0.16 (-2.16, 2.54)
*p<0.05, *p<0.10
July 2009
E-124
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: (Host et al„ 2008,155852)
Period of Study: 2000 - 2003
Location: Six French cities: Le Havre,
Lille, Marseille, Paris, Rouen, and
Toulouse
Outcome (ICD-10): Daily hospitalizations
for all cardiovascular (I00-I99), cardiac
(I00-I52), and ischemic heart diseases
(I20-I25), all respiratory diseases (J00-
J99), respiratory infections (J10-J22).
Age Groups: For cardiovascular
diseases: All ages, and restricted to a 65
years. For all respiratory diseases: 0-14
years, 15-64 years, and a 65 years. For
respiratory infections: All ages
Study Design: Time series
N: NR (Total population of cities:
approximately 10 million)
Statistical Analyses: Poisson regression
Covariates: Seasons, days of the week,
holidays, influenza epidemics, pollen
counts, temperature, and temporal trends
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: MGCV package in
R software (R 2.1.1)
Lags Considered: Avg of 0-1 days
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (5th -95th percentile): Le Havre:
13.8(6.0-30.5)
Lille: 15.9(6.9-26.3)
Marseille: 18.8(8.0-33.0)
Paris: 14.7 (6.5-28.8)
Rouen: 14.4(7.5-28.0)
Toulouse: 13.8 (6.0-25.0)
Monitoring Stations: 13 total: 1 in
Toulouse
4 in Paris
2 each in other cities
Copollutant (correlation): PM102 e:
Overall: r > 0.6
Ranged between r - 0.28 and
r - 0.73 across the six cities.
PM Increment: 10//gf'nv1 increase, and a
27 /yglm3 increase (corresponding to the
difference between the lowest of the 5th
percentiles and the highest of the 95th
percentiles of the cities' distributions)
ERR (excess relative risk) Estimate [CI]:
For all cardiovascular diseases (10 //gf'nr1
increase): All ages: 0.9% [0.1,1.8]
a 65 years: 1.9% [0.9, 3.0]
For all cardiovascular diseases (27 //gfm3
increase): All ages: 2.5% [0.2, 4.9]
>65 years: 5.3% [2.6, 8.2]
For ischemic heart diseases (27 //g|m3
increase): All ages: 5.2% [-0.6,11.3]
>65 years: 12.7% [6.3,19.5]
For cardiac diseases (10 //gf'nv1 increase):
All ages: 0.9% [-0.1,2.0]
>65 years: 2.4% [1.2, 3.7]
For cardiac diseases (27 //g|m3 increase):
All ages: 2.5% [-0.3, 5.4]
a 65 years: 6.8% [3.3,10.3]
For ischemic heart diseases (10 /yglm3
increase): All ages: 1.9 % [-0.2, 4.0]
>65 years: 4.5% [2.3, 6.8]
For all respiratory diseases (10 /yglm3
increase): 0-14 years: 0.4% [-1.2, 2.0]
15-64 years: 0.8% [-0.7, 2.3];
a 65 years: 0.5% [-2.0, 3.0]
For all respiratory diseases (27 /yglm3
increase): 0-14 years: 1.1% [-3.1, 5.5]
15-64 years: 2.2% [-1.8, 6.4];
> 65 years: 1.3% [-5.3,8.2]
For respiratory infections (10 /yglm3
increase): All ages: 2.5% [0.1, 4.8]
For respiratory infections (27 /yglm3
increase): All ages: 7.0% [0.7,13.6]
July 2009
E-125
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Jalaludin et al. (2006,
189416)
Period of Study: 1 Jan, 1997-31 Dec,
2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
Outcome (ICD-9): Cardiovascular disease
(390-459), cardiac disease (390-429),
ischemic heart disease (410-413) and
cerebrovascular disease or stroke (430-
438)
Age Groups: 65+ yrs
Study Design: Time series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: GAM, GLM
Covariates: Temperature, humidity
Season: Warm (Nov-Apr) and cool (May-
Oct)
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: S-Plus
Lags Considered: 0-3 days
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (min-max): 9.5 (2.4-82.1)
SD - 5.1
Monitoring Stations: 14
Copollutant (correlation): Warm
BSP: r - 0.93
PMio: r - 0.89
0s: r - 0.57
NO?: r - 0.45
CO: r - 0.35
SO?: r - 0.27
Cool
BSP: r - 0.90
PM10: r - 0.88
O3: r - 0.05
NO?: r - 0.68
CO: r - 0.60
SO2: r - 0.46
Other variables: Warm
Temp: r - 0.24
Rel humidity: r - -0.15
Cool
Temp: r - -0.04
Rel humidity: r - 0.20
PM Increment: 4.8 /yglm3 (IQR)
Percent Change Estimate [CI]: All CVD
Same-day lag: 1.26 [0.56,1.96]
Avg 0-1 day lag: 0.85 [0.18,1.52]
Cool (same-day lag): 2.23 [0.98,3.50]
Warm (same-day lag): 0.73
[-0.05,1.52]
Cardiac disease
Same-day lag: 1.55 [0.74,2.38]
Avg 0-1 day lag: 1.33 [0.54,2.13]
Cool (same-day lag): 2.37 [0.87,3.89]
Warm (same-day lag): 1.13 [0.22,2.04]
Ischemic heart disease
Same-day lag: 1.17 [-0.08,2.44]
Avg 0-1 day lag: 1.24(0.04,2.45]
Cool (same-day lag): 0.57 [-1.74,2.94]
Warm (same-day lag): 1.31
[-0.04,2.68]
Stroke
Same-day lag: -0.89 [-2.41,0.65]
Avg 0-1 day lag:-1.08 [-2.54,0.41]
Cool (same-day lag): 1.45 [-1.17,4.15]
Warm (same-day lag): -2.19 [-4.00,-0.36]
Notes: All other lag-day ORs were
provided, yet none were significant.
Percent change in ED attendance was
also reported graphically
(Fig 1-5).
July 2009
E-126
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Jalaludin et al. (2006,
189416)
Period of Study: 1 Jan, 1997-31 Dec,
2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
Outcome (ICD-9): Cardiovascular disease
(390-459), cardiac disease (390-429),
ischemic heart disease (410-413) and
cerebrovascular disease or stroke (430-
438)
Age Groups: 65+ yrs
Study Design: Time series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: GAM, GLM
Covariates: Temperature, humidity
Season: Warm (Nov-Apr) and cool (May-
Oct)
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: S-Plus
Lags Considered: 0-3 days
Pollutant: Bs.p
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean/ 104/m (min-max): 0.26 (0.04-3.37)
SD - 0.22
Monitoring Stations: 14
Copollutant (correlation): Warm
PM2.6: r - 0.93
PM10: r - 0.82
0s: r - 0.48
NO?: r - 0.35
CO: r - 0.33
SO2: r - 0.21;
Cool
PM2.6: r - 0.90
PM10: r - 0.75
O3: r - -0.08
NO2: r - 0.59
CO: r - 0.62
SO2: r - 0.48
Other variables: Warm
Temp: r - 0.23
Rel humidity: r - -0.04
Cool
Temp: r - -0.09
Rel humidity: r - 0.36
PM Increment: 0.181104/m (IQR)
Percent Change Estimate [CI]: All CVD
Same-day lag: 1.05 [0.44,1.66]
Avg 0-1 day lag: 0.79 [0.20,1.38];
Cool (same-day lag): 2.38 [1.15,3.62]
Warm (same-day lag): 0.45 [-0.18,1.09]
Cardiac disease
Same-day lag: 1.34 [0.63,2.05]
Avg 0-1 day lag: 1.13 [0.44,1.82];
Cool (same-day lag): 2.50(1.04,3.98]
Warm (same-day lag): 0.80 [0.07,1.54]
Ischemic heart disease
Same-day lag: 0.91 [-0.17,2.02]
Avg 0-1 day lag: 0.90 [-0.14,1.95];
Cool (same-day lag): 0.52 [-1.74,2.83]
Warm (same-day lag): 0.93 [-0.15,2.03]
Stroke
Same-day lag: -0.93 [-2.27,0.42]
Avg 0-1 day lag:-0.82 [-2.11,0.49];
Cool (same-day lag): 1.38 [-1.19,4.01 ];
Warm (same-day lag): -1.85 [-3.31,-0.36]
Notes: All other lag-day ORs were
provided, yet none were significant.
Percent change in ED attendance was
also reported graphically (Fig 1-5).
Reference: Lisabeth et al. (2008,
155939)
Period of Study: 2001 ¦ 2005
Location: Nueces County, Texas
Outcome: Ischemic stroke and transient
ischemic attacks (ICD codes not
reported).
Age Groups: 45+ years
Study Design: Time series
N: 3,508 stroke/TIAs (2,350 strokes, and
1,158 TIAs)
Statistical Analyses: Poisson regression
Covariates: Temperature, day of week,
temporal trends
Season: All, but looked at potential
effect modification by season (Summer:
June-September
Non-summer: October-May)
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: S-plus 7.0
Lags Considered: Lags 0-5 days, and
averaged lag effect (0-5 days)
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Median/yglm3 (IQR): 7.0(4.8-10.0)
Monitoring Stations: 6
Copollutant (correlation): NR
PM Increment: 5.1 /yglm3 (IQR)
RR Estimate [CI]: Lag 0:1.03 (0.99,
1.07)
Lag 1:1.03 (1.00-1.07)
All other lags and avg (lag 0-5) were not
statistically or marginally significant.
Adjusted for O3: Lag 0: 1.03 (0.99,1.07)
Lag 1:1.03 (0.99-1.06)
All other lags and avg (lag 0-5) were not
statistically or marginally significant.
Notes: Figure 3: % change in stroke/TIA
risk associated with an IQR increase in
PM2.5
July 2009
E-127
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Metzgeret al. (2004,
044222)
Period of Study: August 1998-August
2000
Location: Atlanta Metropolitan area
(Georgia)
Outcome (ICD-9): Emergency visits for
ischemic heart disease (410-414),
cardiac dysrhythmias (427), cardiac
arrest (427.5), congestive heart failure
(428), peripheral vascular and
cerebrovascular disease (433-437, 440,
443-444,451-453), atherosclerosis
(440), and stroke (436).
Age Groups: All
Study Design: Time series
N: 4,407,535 emergency department
visits for 1993-2000 (data not reported
for 1998-2000)
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
generalized linear modeling
Covariates: Day of the week, hospital
entry and exit indicator variables,
federally observed holidays, temporal
trends, temperature, dew point
temperature
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 3-day moving avg,
lags 0 -7
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Median/yg/m3 (10%-90% range): PM2.6:
17.8(8.9, 32.3)
PM2.6 water soluble metals: 0.021
(0.006-0.061)
PM2.6 acidity: 4.5 (1.9-1.07)
PM2.6 organic carbon: 0.010
(-0.001-0.045)
PM2.6 elemental carbon: 4.1
(2.2-7.1)
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation):
PM10: r - 0.84
O3: r - 0.65
NO2: r - 0.46
CO: r - 0.44
SO2: r - 0.17
PMio-2.b: r - .43
UFP: r - -0.16
PM2.6 water-sol metals: r - 0.70
PM2.6 sulfates: r - 0.77
PM2.6 acidity: r - 0.58
PM2.6 organic carbon: r - 0.51
PM2.6 elemental carbon: r - 0.48
oxygenated hydrocarbon: r - 31
Other variables:
Temperature: r - 0.20
Dew point: r - 0.00
PM Increment: Approximately 1 SD
increase: PM2.6: 10/yg/m3
PM2.6 water-sol metals: 0.03 //g|m3
PM2.6 sulfates: 5/yg/m3
PM2.6 acidity: 0.02 /yequ/m3
PM2.6 organic carbon: 2/yg/m3
PM2.6 elemental carbon: 1 /yglm3
RR [95% CI]: PM2.6 (3-day moving avg):
All CVD: 1.033[1.010,1.056]
Dysrhythmia: 1.015 [0.976,1.055]
Congestive heart failure: 1.055 [1.006—
1.105]
Ischemic heart disease: 1.023 [0.983—
1.064]
Peripheral vascular and cerebrovascular
disease: 1.050(1.008-1.093]
PM2.E water soluble metals (3-day moving
avg): All CVD: 1.027(0.998,1.056]
Dysrhythmia: 1.031 [0.982,1.082]
Congestive heart failure: 1.040 [0.981 —
1.103]
Ischemic heart disease: 1.000 [0.951 —
1.051]
Peripheral vascular and cerebrovascular
disease: 1.043 [0.991-1.098]
PM2.E sulfates (3-day moving avg): All
CVD: 1.003 [0.968,1.039]
Dysrhythmia: 0.986 [0.926,1.048]
Congestive heart failure: 1.009 [0.938—
1.085]
Ischemic heart disease: 0.997 [0.936—
1.062]
Peripheral vascular and cerebrovascular
disease: 1.025 [0.964-1.090]
PM2.6 acidity (3-day moving avg): All CVD:
0.994 [0.966,1.022]
Dysrhythmia: 0.991 [0.942,1.043]
Congestive heart failure: 0.989 [0.930—
1.052]
Ischemic heart disease: 0.992 [0.944—
1.043]
Peripheral vascular and cerebrovascular
disease: 1.004 [0.955-1.056]
PM2.5 organic carbon (3-day moving avg):
All CVD: 1.026(1.006,1.046]
Dysrhythmia: 1.008 [0.975,1.044]
Congestive heart failure: 1.048 [1.007—
1.091]
Ischemic heart disease: 1.028 [0.994—
1.064]
Peripheral vascular and cerebrovascular
disease: 1.026 [0.990-1.062]
hydrocarbons simultaneously.
PM2.E organic carbon (3-day moving avg):
All CVD: 1.020(1.005,1.036]
Dysrhythmia: 1.011 [0.985,1.037]
Congestive heart failure: 1.035 [1.003—
1-QffiRFT- DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
Ischemic heart disease: 1.019 [0.992—
1.046]
Peripheral vascular and cerebrovascular
July 2009
E-128
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Peng et al. (2008,156850)
Period of Study: January 1,1999-
December 31, 2005
Location: 108 U.S. counties in the
following states: Alabama, Arizona,
California, Colorado, Connecticut, District
of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Idaho,
Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana,
Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts,
Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nevada,
New Hampshire, New Jersey, New
Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio,
Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode
Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas,
Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia,
Wisconsin
Outcome (ICD-9): Emergency
hospitalizations for: Cardiovascular
disease, including heart failure (428),
heart rhythm disturbances (426-427),
cerebrovascular events (430-438),
ischemic heart disease (410-414,429),
and peripheral vascular disease (440-
448). Respiratory disease, including
COPD (490-492) and respiratory tract
infections (464-466, 480-487)
Age Groups: 65 + years, 65-74, ,75 +
Study Design: Time series
N: —12 million Medicare enrollees (3.7
million CVD and 1.4 million RD
admissions)
Statistical Analyses: Two-stage
Bayesian hierarchical models:
Overdispersed Poisson models for county-
specific data
Bayesian hierarchical models to obtain
national avg estimate
Covariates: Day of the week, age-
specific intercept, temperature, dew point
temperature, calendar time, indicator for
age of 75 years or older. Some models
were adjusted for PMio-2.5.
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: R version 2.6.2
Lags Considered: 0-2 days
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean //gfm3 (IQR): All counties assessed:
13.5(11.1-15.8)
Counties in Eastern US:
13.8(12.3-15.8)
Counties in Western US:
11.1 (10.1-14.3)
Monitoring Stations: At least 1 pair of
co-located monitors (physically located in
the same place) for PMio and PM2.6 per
county
Other variables: Median within-county
correlations between monitors: r - 0.92
PM Increment: 10 //g|m3
Percentage change [95% CI]: CVD and RD
(unadjusted for PMio-25): Lag 0: 0.71
[0.45, 0.96]
Lag 2: 0.44(0.06, 0.82]
Most values NR (see note)
Notes: Effect estimates for PMio-2.5 (0-
2 day lags) are showing in Figures 2-5.
Figure 2: Percentage change in
emergency hospital admissions for CVD
per 10 /yglm3 increase in PM2.6 (single
pollutant model and model adjusted for
PMio-2.5 concentration)
Figure 3: Percentage change in
emergency hospital admissions for RD per
10 /yglm3 increase in PM2.6 (single
pollutant model and model adjusted for
PMio-2.5 concentration)
No significant associations between
PM2.E and cause-specific cardiovascular
disease.
Reference: Peters et al. (2005,156859)
Period of Study: February 1999-July
31,2001
Location: Germany: City of Augsburg,
County Augsburg, and County Aichach-
Friedlberg
Outcome: Transmural or nontransmural
acute Ml
Age Groups: NR
Study Design: Case-crossover and time
series
N: 851 Ml survivors
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression for case-crossover
element. Poisson regression for time
series element.
Covariates: Case-crossover: Season,
temperature, day of the week, time
series: trend, season, influenza, weather,
and day of the week
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package:
SAS, version 8.2
Poisson: R, version 1.7.1
Lags Considered:
Lags 0-6 h, 0-5 days
Poisson: Single lagged days, 5-day, 15-
day, 30-day, and 45-day moving averages
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 1 h and 24 h
Mean //g/m3 (range
IQR
median
IQR): 1-h avg: 16.3 (-6.9-355.2
10.7-19.8
14.5)
24-h avg: 16.3 (6.1-58.5
11.6-19.3
14.9)
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation):
24-h avg:
TNC: r - 0.37
TSP: r - 0.89
PM10: r- 0.92
CO: r - 0.57
NO2: r - 0.67
NO: r - 0.59
SO2: r - 0.58
O3: r - -0.24
1 hr avg:
PM Increment: 1-h avg: 9.1 /yglm3 (IQR)
24-h avg: 7.7 //gfm3 (IQR)
OR [95% CI]: Case-Crossover (control
selection method (unidirectional with
three control periods): 1-h averages: Lag
0: 0.98(0.88,1.10)
Lag 1: 0.97 (0.87,1.09)
Lag 2: 0.93 (0.83,1.04)
Lag 3: 0.98 (0.88,1.09)
Lag 4: 0.96 (0.86,1.07)
Lag 5: 0.94 (0.84,1.05)
Lag 6: 0.90 (0.80,1.01). 24-h averages:
LagO: 0.95 (0.83,1.080)
Lag 1:1.10 (0.96,1.25)
Lag 2: 1.18(1.03,1.34)
Lag 3: 1.07 (0.94,1.22)
Lag 4: 0.94 (0.83,1.07)
Lag 5: 0.90 (0.79,1.02)
Case-Crossover (control selection
method: bidirectional with 16 control
periods): 24-h averages: Lag 0: 1.03
(0.94,1.12)
Lag 1: 1.07 (0.98,1.16)
Lag 2: 1.08 (0.99,1.17)
Lag 3: 1.01 (0.92,1.10)
Lag 4: 0.96 (0.88,1.04)
July 2009
E-129
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
TNC: r - 0.42
CO: r - 0.52
NO?: r - 0.58
NO: r - 0.50
SO?: r - 0.48
O3: r - -0.35
Other variables:
24-h avg: Temperature: r - 0.05
1-h avg: Temperature: r - -0.01
Lag 5: 0.93 (0.85,1.02)
Lag 0 -4 (IQR - 5.8): 1.03 (0.94,1.14)
Unidirectional: Model 1 (unadjusted):
1.175(1.033,1.337)
Model 2 (adjusted for day of week using
indicator variables): 1.179(1.035,1.343)
Model 3 (adjusted for temperature-
quadratic, linear air pressure): 1.170
(1.028,1.333)
Model 4 (adjusted for temperature-quad-
ratic, linear air pressure, day of week):
1.176(1.031,1.341)
Model 5 (temperature-quadratic, air
pressure-quadratic, relative humidity-
quadratic, day of week using indicator
variables): 1.170 (1.026,1.336)
Model 6 (temperature-penalized spline,
4.4 df, linear air pressure, day of week
using indicator variables): 1.175 (1.030,
1.340
Model 7 (temperature-penalized spline,
4.4 df, linear air pressure, relative
humidity-penalized spline, 7.8 df, day of
week using indicator variables: 1.177
(1.030,1.344)
Bidirectional (16 control periods): Model 1
(unadjusted): 1.077 (0.988,1.174)
Model 2 (adjusted for day of the week
using indicator variables): 1.078 (0.988,
1.175)
Model 3 (adjusted for temperature-
quadratic, linear air pressure): 1.060
(0.970,1.160)
Model 4 (adjusted for temperature-
quadratic, linear air pressure, day of the
week): 1.060 (0.969,1.160)
Model 5
Continued on next page
Continued from previous page
(temperature-quadratic, air pressure-
quadratic, relative humidity-quadratic,
day of the week using indicator
variables): 1.065 (0.973,1.166)
Model 6 (temperature-penalized spline,
4.4 df, linear air pressure, day of the
week using indicator variables): 1.068
(0.976,1.168)
Model 7 (temperature-penalized spline,
4.4 df, linear air pressure, relative
humidity-penalized spline, 7.8 df, day of
the week using indicator variables: 1.077
(0.983,1.179)
Bidirectional (4 control periods): Model 1
(unadjusted): NR
Model 2 (adjusted for day of the week by
design): 1.049 (0.964,1.141)
Model 3 (adjusted for temperature-
quadratic, linear air pressure): NR
Model 4 (adjusted for temperature-
quadratic, linear air pressure, day of the
week): 1.032 (0.944,1.128)
July 2009
E-130
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Model 5 (temperature-quadratic, air
pressure-quadratic, relative humidity-
quadratic, day of the week by design):
1.033 (0.945,1.130)
Model 6 (temperature-penalized spline,
4.4 df, linear air pressure, day of the
week by design): 1.036 (0.947,1.132)
Model 7 (temperature-penalized spline,
4.4 df, linear air pressure, relative
humidity-penalized spline, 7.8 df, day of
the week by design): 1.039 (0.950,
1.136)
Stratified: Model 1 (unadjusted): NR
Model 2 (adjusted for day of week by
design): 1.059 (0.972,1.154)
Model 3 (adjusted for temperature-
quadratic, linear air pressure): NR
Model 4 (adjusted for temperature-
quadratic, linear air pressure, day of
week): 1.047 (0.957,1.145)
Model 5 (temperature-quadratic, air
pressure-quadratic, relative humidity-
quadratic, day of week by design): 1.045
(0.954,1.144)
Model 6 (temperature-penalized spline,
4.4 df, linear air pressure, day of week by
design): 1.054 (0.964,1.153odel 7
(temperature-penalized spline, 4.4 df,
linear air pressure, relative humidity-
penalized spline, 7.8 df, day of week by
design): 1.056 (0.965,1.156)
RR (95% CI): Time series (24 h avg): Lag
0: 0.97(0.89,1.07)
Lag 1: 1.04 (0.96,1.13)
Lag 2: 1.07 (0.98,1.15)
Lag 3: 1.03 (0.95,1.11)
Lag 4: 0.98 (0.90,1.07)
Lag 5: 0.98 (0.90,1.06)
Lag 0-4: 1.03 (0.94,1.12)
Lag 0-14: 1.03 (0.95,1.13)
Lag 0-29: 1.09 (1.01,1.18)
Lag 0-44: 1.08 (1.00,1.17)
Time series (OR [95% CI]): Model 1
(unadjusted): 1.059 (0.981,1.142)
Model 2 (adjusted for day of week using
indicator variables): 1.056(0.979,1.140)
Model 3 (adjusted for temperature-
quadratic, linear air pressure): 1.062
(0.982,1.148)
Model 4 (adjusted for temperature-
quadratic, linear air pressure, day of
week): 1.059 (0.979,1.146)
Model 5 (temperature-quadratic, air
pressure-quadratic, relative humidity-
quadratic, day of week using indicator
variables): 1.063 (0.981,1.151)
Model 6 (temperature-penalized spline,
4.4 df, linear air pressure, day of week
using indicator variables): 1.065 (0.985,
1.153)
July 2009
E-131
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Model 7 (temperature-penalized spline,
4.4 df, linear air pressure, relative
humidity-penalized spline, 7.8 df, day of
week using indicator variables: 1.069
(0.988,1.157)
Reference: Pope et al.(2006, 091246)
Period of Study: 1994-2004
Location: Wasatch Front area, Utah
Outcome: Myocardial infarction or
unstable angina (ICD codes not reported)
Age Groups: All, < 65, 65 +
Study Design: Case-crossover
N: 12,865 patients who underwent
coronary arteriography
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Covariates: Temperature and dew point
temperature
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 0- to 3-day lag, 2- to
4-day lagged moving averages
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (/L/g|m3) (SD
maximum): Ogden: 10.8 (10.6
108)
SLC Hawthorne: 11.3 (11.9
94)
Provo/Orem, Lindom: 10.1 (9.8
82)
Monitoring Stations: 3
Copollutant (correlation): NR
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3
Percent increase in risk [95% CI]: Same-
day increase in PM2.6 (Lag 0): Index Ml
and unstable angina: 4.81 [0.98-8.79]
Subsequent Ml: 3.23 [-3.87,10.85]
All acute coronary events: 4.46 [1.07-
7.97]
All acute coronary events excluding
observations using imputed PM2.6 data:
4.24(0.33-8.31]
Stable presentation: -2.57 [-5.39, 0.34]
Remaining results summarized in figures
(see notes).
Notes: Figure 1: Percent increase in risk
(and 95% CI) of acute coronary events
associated with 10/yg/m3 of PM2.6 for
different lag structures.
Summary of Figure 1: Positive,
statistically significant association seen
for Lag 0, Lag 1
and 2, 3, and 4 day moving averages.
Positive but non-statistically significant
associations seen for Lags 2 and 3.
Figure 2: Percent increase in risk (and
95% CI) of acute coronary events
associated with 10/yg/m of PM2.6
stratified by various characteristics.
July 2009
E-132
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Pope et al. (2008,191969)
Period of Study: 1994-2006
Location: Ogden, Salt Lake City, &
Provo/Orem, Utah
Outcome: Heart Failure Hospitalizations
Age Groups: NR
Study Design: case-crossover
l\l: 2,618
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
Logistic Regression
Covariates: age, sex, length of stay,
temperature, pressure, clearing index, day
of the week, seasonality, and long-term
trends
Season: Adjusted for long-term trends to
account for season
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 0-28d moving avg.
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: NR
Mean (SD):
Ogden: 10.6(9.9)
SLC, Hawthorne: 11.1 (11.2)
Provo/Orem, Lindon: 10.1 (9.3)
Max:
Ogden: 108
SLC, Hawthorne: 94 Provo/Orem, Lindon:
82
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: PMio
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Percent Increase: (Lower CI, Upper
CI):
All HF Admissions
All: 13.1 (1.3, 26.2)*
Men: 13.4 (-1.7, 30.7)*
Women: 12.7 (-5.1, 33.9)
Age < 65 yrs: 3.5 (-13.5, 23.8)
Age £65 yrs: 19.6 (4.0, 37.5)*
Length of stay 0-2 days: 24.4 (-0.8, 56.0)
*
Length of stay 3-7 days: 10.8 (-4.6, 28.7)
Length of stay 8+ days: 6.5 (-15.9, 34.8)
First HF Admissions: 2.1 (-11.3,17.5)
Subsequent HF Admits: 32.4 (10.7, 58.4)
All HF Admissions
All: 32.4 (10.7, 58.4)*
Men: 29.2(2.7, 62.6)*
Women: 41.5 (5.4, 89.9)*
Age <65 yrs:-3.1 (-26.5, 27.8)
Age >65 yrs: 64.1 (28.6,109)*
Length of stay 0-2 days: 68.9 (12.5,
154)*
Length of stay 3-7 days: 35.7 (5.9,
73.9)*
Length of stay 8+ days: 2.6 (-28.5,47.1)
*p< 0.05, * p< 0.01, *p< 0.10
July 2009
E-133
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Sarnat et al. (2008, 097972)
Period of Study: November 1998-
December 2002
Location: Atlanta (Georgia) metropolitan
area
Age Groups: All
Study Design: Time series
N: >4.5 million emergency department
visits
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
generalized linear models
Covariates: Day of the week, holidays,
hospital, long-term trends, temperature,
dew point temperature
Season: All, warm season (April 15-
October 14), and cool season (October
15-April 14).
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 0-day lag
Outcome (ICD-9): Cardiovascular disease
ED visits: Ischemic heart disease (410—
414), cardiac dysrhythmias (427),
congestive heart failure (428), and
peripheral vascular and cerebrovascular
disease (433-437,440, 443-444,451-
453)
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean l//g/m3) (median
10th-90th percentile): Total PM2.6: Cool
season: 15.8 (14.3
7.5-25.5). Warm season: 18.2 (17.0
9.1-29.0)
PM2.6 elemental carbon: Cool: 1.7 (1.4
0.6-3.3). Warm: 1.4 (1.3
0.6-2.5)
PM2.B Zn (ng/m3): Cool: 15.7 (11.7
4.6-30.2)
Warm: 10.9 (8.5
3.3-20.2)
PM2.6 K (ng/m3): Cool: 63.0 (53.9
24.3-114.2) Warm: 52.7 (43.3
23.2-93.5)
PM2.6 Si (ng/m3): Cool: 67.7 (54.1
24.3-123.5). Warm: 110.9(89.0
32.9-186.3)
PM2.6 SO42': Cool: 3.4 (0.6
1.5-5.8). Warm: 6.0 (5.2
2.3-10.8)
PM2.6 N03-: Cool: 1.4 (1.2
0.5-2.6). Warm: 0.7 (2.9
0.3-1.2)
PM2.6 Se (ng/m3): Cool: 1.4 (1.1
0.4-3.0). Warm: 1.2 (0.9
0.4-2.7)
PM2.6 0C: Cool: 4.6 (3.9
1.9-8.0)
Warm: 4.0 (3.7
2.1-6.4)
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutants: NR
PM Increment: IQR (specific values not
given)
Risk ratio [95% CI]: CVD (Lag 0): All
seasons: Total PM2.6: 1.022 [1.007,
1.038]
PM2.6 elemental carbon: 1.02 [1.013—
1.037]
PM2.6 zinc: 1.013 [1.005-1.022]
PM2.6 potassium: 1.030 [1.018-1.042]
PM2.6 silicon: 1.008(1.00-1.016]
PM2.6 sulfate: 1.007 [0.994-1.019]
PM2.6 nitrate: 1.002 [0.990-1.014]
PM2.6 selenium: 1.002 [0.991 -1.012]
PM2.6 organic carbon: 1.024 [1.013-
1.035]
Cool season: Total PM2.6: 1.028 [1.012-
1.044]
PM2.6 EC: 1.029 [1.015-1.044]
PM2.6 Zinc: 1.012(1.002-1.022]
PM2.6 K: 1.037(1.021-1.054]
PM2.6 Si: 1.022(1.002-1.043]
PM2.6 sulfate: 1.014 [0.991-1.037]
PM2.6 nitrate: 1.006 [0.993-1.019]
PM2.6 Se: 1.012 [0.997-1.027]
PM2.6 organic carbon: 1.027 [1.013-
1.040]
Warm season: Total PM2.6: 1.006
[0.990-1.022]
PM2.6 EC: 1.021 [1.000-1.043]
PM2.6 Zinc: 1.017 [1.002-1.033]
PM2.6 K: 1.024 [1.007-1.041]
PM2.6 Si: 1.005 [0.996-1.014]
PM2.6 sulfate: 1.001 [0.988-1.015]
PM2.6 nitrate: 1.000 [0.969-1.033]
PM2.6 Se: 0.996 [0.981-1.011]
PM2.B organic carbon: 1.027 [1.004-
1.051]
July 2009
E-134
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Schreuder et al. (2006,
097959)
Period of Study: Sept 1995 - May
2002
Location: Spokane, Washington
Outcome: Cardiac HA
Age Groups: NR
Study Design: time series
Statistical Analyses: GAM Poisosn
Regression
Covariates: season, temperature,
relative humidity, day of week
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: S-Plus
Lags Considered: 0-1 d
Pollutant: PM2.6 (ng/m3)
Averaging Time: 24h
Arithmetic Mean: 10,580
Geometric Mean: 8,790
Min: 930
Max: 43,230
IQR:
entire period: 7.7 //g|m3
heating season: 10.1/yg/m3
non-heating season: 5.5/yg/m3
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: NR
Co-pollutant Correlation
NR
PM Increment: Interquartile I
Relative Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI):
Entire Period, Lag 0: 1.008 (0.985,
1.032)
Entire Period, Lag 1: 1.000 (0.978,
1.023)
Heating Season, Lag 1:1.015 (0.968,
1.063)
Non-Heating Season, Lag 1: 0.995
(0.969,1.021)
Reference: Sullivan et al. (2005,
109418)
Period of Study: 1988-1994
Location: King County, Washington
Outcome: Acute Ml
Age Groups: All, < 50, 50-59, 70 +
Study Design: Case-crossover
N: 5793 cases of acute Ml (5793 case
days and 20,134 referent exposure days
from these case individuals)
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Covariates: Relative humidity,
temperature, season, day of week
Season: All, and also conducted
stratified analysis by season of event
(heating season: November-February
nonheating season: March-October)
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: SAS version 8.0
and SPSS version 10
Lags Considered: Lag 1 and Lag 2 for
24-h avg
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, and 24 h
Summary of PM2.61 h before Ml onset:
Mean (/L/g|m3) (median
IQR, 90th percentile
range): 12.8 (8.6
5.3-15.9
27.3
2.0-147)
Monitoring Stations: 3
Copollutant (correlation): 1-h avg:
PM10: r - 0.78
CO: r - 0.47
SO2: r - 0.16
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3
Odds ratio [95% CI]:
1-h Averaging Time: 1.01 [0.98,1.05]
2-h Averaging Time: 1.01 [0.97,1.05]
4-h Averaging Time: 1.02 [0.98,1.04]
24-h Averaging Time: 1.02 [0.98,1.07]
Association between PM2.6 (24 h) lagged
1 or 2 days non-significant (data not
shown)
Season (1-h avg): Heating: 1.01 [0.98—
1.05]
Nonheating: 0.99 [0.91-1.09]
Age (1-h avg): < 50 years: 1.04 [0.95,
1.14]
50-60 years: 0.99 [0.94,1.05]
70+ years: 1.03 [0.98,1.08]
Age (24-h avg): < 50 years: 1.07 [0.98,
1.19]
50-69 years: 0.99 [0.93,1.06]
70+ years: 1.04 [0.99,1.11]
Sex (1-h avg): Men: 1.02[0.98,1.06]
Women: 1.00 [0.95,1.06]
Sex (24-h avg): Men: 1.03 [0.99,1.08]
Women: 1.00 [0.94,1.07]
Race (1-h avg): White: 1.01 [0.97,1.04]
Nonwhite: 1.06 [0.97,1.17]
Race (24-h avg): White: 1.01 [0.97,1.06]
Nonwhite: 1.10[0.99,1.23]
Smoking status (1-h avg): Current: 0.99
[0.93,1.06]
Nonsmoker: 1.03[0.97,1.08]
Smoking status (24-h avg): Current: 0.99
[0.95,1.14]
July 2009
E-135
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Nonsmoker: 1.03 [0.98,1.09]
Survivor of Ml * (1 -h avg): Yes: 1.02
[0.98,1.06]
No: 0.96(0.86,1.08]
Survivor of Ml * (24-h avg): Yes: 1.03
[0.98,1.07]
No: 0.97(0.85,1.10]
Previous congestive heart failure (1 h
avg): Yes: 1.06 [0.97,1.16]
No: 1.00(0.97,1.04]
Previous congestive heart failure (24-h
avg): Yes: 1.08 [0.97,1.2]
No: 1.00(0.97,1.04]
Previous Ml (1 -h avg): Yes: 1.03 [0.97,
1.1]
No: 1.01 [0.96,1.06]
Previous Ml (24-h avg): Yes: 1.04 [0.97,
1.17]
No: 1.02(0.98,1.08]
Hypertension (1-h avg): Yes: 1.02 [0.97,
1.07]
No: 1.01 [0.96,1.06]
Hypertension (24-h avg): Yes: 1.02 [0.97,
1.07]
No: 1.02(0.97,1.08]
Diabetes mellitus (1 -h avg): Yes: 1.06
[0.98,1.14]
No: 1.01 [0.97,1.05]
Diabetes mellitus (24-h avg): Yes: 1.04
[0.95,1.14]
No: 1.01 [0.97,1.06]
"Compares those who survive
hospitalization (yes) with those who died
in hospital from complications of Ml.
July 2009
E-136
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Symons et al. (2006,
091258)
Period of Study: Apr-Dec, 2002
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Outcome: Congestive heart failure
Age Groups: All
Study Design: Case-crossover
N: 125 patients
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Covariates: Temperature and humidity
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: Yes
Statistical Package: SAS and S-Plus
Lags Considered: 0-3 days (single and
cumulative)
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 8 & 24 h
Mean (min-max):
8 h
17.0(0.1-111.9)
SD - 12.7
24 h
16.0 (3.5-69.2)
SD - 10.0
Monitoring Stations: 8
Copollutant (correlation): NR
PM Increment: 9.2 /yglm3 (IQR)
RR Estimate [CI]:
8 h (participant's onset period)
Same-day lag: 0.87 [0.69,1.09]
1-day lag: 0.96 [0.78,1.18]
2-day lag: 1.09 [0.91,1.30]
3-day lag: 0.99 [0.79,1.23]
Cumulative 1-day lag: 0.89 [0.67,1.16]
Cumulative 2-day lag: 0.99 [0.74,1.33]
Cumulative 3-day lag: 0.98 [0.70,1.36]
24 h avg
Same-day lag: 0.81 [0.65,1.01]
1-day lag: 0.90 [0.74,1.11]
2-day lag: 0.85 [0.68,1.07]
3-day lag: 0.86 [0.70,1.05]
Cumulative 1-day lag: 0.82 [0.64,1.04]
Cumulative 2-day lag: 0.76 [0.57,1.01]
Cumulative 3-day lag: 0.70 [0.51,0.97]
Notes: (3 coefficients presented in Fig 5
July 2009
E-137
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Tolbert et al. (2007,
090316)
Period of Study: August 1998-
December 2004
Location: Atlanta Metropolitan area,
Georgia
Outcome (ICD-9):
Combined CVD group, including:
Ischemic heart disease (410-414),
cardiac dysrhythmias (427), congestive
heart failure (428), and peripheral
vascular and cardiovascular disease
(433-437,440,443-445, and 451 -
453)
Age Groups: All
Study Design: Time series
l\l:NR for 1998-2004.
For 1993-2004:10,234,490 ER visits
(283,360 and 1,072,429 visits included
in the CVD and RD groups, respectively)
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
generalized linear models
Covariates: long-term temporal trends,
season (for RD outcome), temperature,
dew point, days of week, federal
holidays, hospital entry and exit
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: SAS version 9.1
Lags Considered: 3-day moving
0-2)
July 2009
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean l//g/m3) (median
IQR, range, 10th -90th percentiles): PM2.6:
17.1 (15.6
11.0-21.9
0.8-65.8
7.9-28.8). PM2.6 sulfate: 4.9 (3.9
2.4-6.2
0.5-21.9
1.7-9.5). PM2.6 organic carbon: 4.4 (3.8
2.7-5.3
0.4-25.9
2.1-7.2). PM2.6 elemental carbon: 1.6
(1.3
0.9-2.0
0.1-11.9
0.6-3.0). PM2.6 water-soluble metals:
0.030 (0.023
0.014-0.039
0.003-0.202
0.009-0.059)
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation): Between
PM2.6 and:
PM10: r - 0.84
O3: r - 0.62
NO2: r - 0.47
CO: r - 0.47
SO2: r - 0.17
PMio-2.5: r - 0.47
PM2.6 SO4: r - 0.76
PM2.6 EC: r - 0.65
PM2.6 0C: r - 0.70
PM2.6 TC: r - 0.71
PM2.6 water-sol metals: r - 0.69
0HC: r - 0.50
Between PM2.6 SO4 and: PM10: r - 0.69
O3: r - 0.56
NO2: r - 0.14
CO: r - 0.14
SO2: r - 0.09
PMio-2.5: r - 0.32
PM2.6: r - 0.76
PM2.6 EC: r - 0.32
PM2.6 0C: r - 0.33
PM2.6 TC: r - 0.34
PM2.6 water-sol metals: r - 0.65
OHC: r - 0.47
-1 Sfitween PM2.6 elemental carbon and:
PM10: r - 0.61
O3: r - 0.40
PM Increment:
PM2.6:10.96/yglm3 (IQR)
PM2.6 sulfate: 3.82/yg/m3 (IQR)
PM2.6 total carbon: 3.63//g|m3 (IQR)
PM2.6 organic carbon: 2.61 //g|m3 (IQR)
PM2.6 elemental carbon: 1.15 /yg/m3 (IQR)
PM2.6 water-soluble metals: 0.03 /yglm3
(IQR)
Risk ratio [95% CI] (single pollutant
models):
PM2.6:
CVD: 1.005 [0.993-1.017]
PM2.6 sulfate:
CVD: 0.999 [0.987-1.011]
PM2.6 total carbon:
CVD: 1.016(1.005-1.026]
PM2.E organic carbon:
CVD: 1.015(1.005-1.026]
PM2.E elemental carbon:
CVD: 1.015 [1.005-1.025]
PM2.E water-soluble metals:
CVD: 1.009 [0.997-1.021]
Notes: Results of selected multi-pollutant
models for cardiovascular disease are
presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1: PM2.6 total carbon adjusted for
CO, NO2, or NO2+CO
Summary of results: PM2.6 total carbon
continued to have a positive, statistically
significant association with CVD after
adjustment for NO2 but not after
adjustment
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Villeneuve et al. (2006,
090191)
Period of Study: 1 Apr, 1992-31 Mar,
2002
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Outcome (ICD-9): Stroke (430-438),
including ischemic stroke (434-436),
hemorrhagic stroke (430,432), and
transient ischemic attacks (TIA) (435).
Age Groups: 65+ yrs
Study Design: Case-crossover
N: 12,422 visits
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Covariates: Temperature and relative
humidity
Season: Summer (Apr-Sep), winter (Oct-
Mar)
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: SAS (PHREG)
Lags Considered: 0,1, and 3-day
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean /yglm3 (SD):
All year: 8.5(6.2)
Summer: 8.7 (7.1)
Winter: 8.3 (5.2)
Monitoring Stations: 3
Copollutant (correlation):
All year
SO?: r - 0.22
NO?: r - 0.41
CO: r - 0.43
03-mean: r - -0.07
03-max: r - 0.07
PM10: r - 0.79
Summer
SO2: r - 0.20
NO2: r - 0.52
CO: r - 0.42
03-mean: r - 0.11
03-max: r - 0.34
PM10: r - 0.85
Winter
SO2: r - 0.28
NO2: r - 0.57
CO: r - 0.71
03-mean: r - -0.45
03-max: r - -0.35
PM10: r - 0.70
PM Increment:/yg/m3 (IQR)
All year: 6.3
Summer: 6.5
Winter: 6.0
Adjusted OR Estimate [CI]:
Acute ischemic stroke
All year: Same-day lag: 1.00 [0.96,1.04]
1-day lag: 1.00 [0.96,1.05]
3-day lag: 1.01 [0.96,1.06]
Summer: Same-day lag: 0.96 [0.90,1.03]
1-day lag: 1.01 [0.94,1.07]
3-day lag: 0.98 [0.89 [1.07]
Winter: Same-day lag: 1.04 [0.99,1.10]
1-day lag: 1.01 [0.96,1.07]
3-day lag: 1.05 [0.98,1.13]
Hemorrhagic stroke
All year: Same-day lag: 0.99 [0.90,1.08]
1-day lag: 1.07 [0.98,1.16]
3-day lag: 1.05 [0.93,1.19]
Summer: Same-day lag: 0.99 [0.86,1.15]
1-day lag: 1.12(0.97,1.30]
3-day lag: 1.08 [0.88,1.31]
Winter: Same-day lag: 1.04 [0.92,1.18]
1-day lag: 1.08 [0.97,1.20]
3-day lag: 1.11 [0.94,1.31]
Transient cerebral ischemic attack
All year: Same-day lag: 0.98 [0.93,1.03]
1-day lag: 0.99 [0.95,1.04]
3-day lag: 0.96 [0.90,1.03]
Summer: Same-day lag: 1.00 [0.92,1.08]
1-day lag: 1.03 [0.95,1.12]
3-day lag: 0.98 [0.88,1.09]
Winter: Same-day lag: 0.97 [0.90,1.05]
1-day lag: 0.97 [0.91,1.04]
3-day lag: 0.94 [0.86,1.03]
Notes: Adjusted ORs are provided for an
IQR increase in the 3-day mean in Fig 1-4
for single and two-pollutant models.
July 2009
E-139
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Zanobetti and Schwartz
Outcome (ICD-9): Myocardial infarction
Pollutant: PM2.6
PM Increment: Difference between the
(2006,090195)
(410) or pneumonia (480-487)
Averaging Time: 24 h
90th and 10th percentile for PM2.6
Period of Study: 1995-1999
Age Groups: 65 + years
Median (/L/g|m3) (IQR
Myocardial infarction cohort (Lag 0):
17.17/yg|m3
Location: Boston Metropolitan area
Study Design: Case-crossover
5th-95th percentile):
Myocardial infarction cohort (Lag 0-1):
N: 15,578 patients admitted for Ml and
25,857 admitted for pneumonia
11.1 (7.23-16.14
16.32 /yglm3
3.87-26.31)
Pneumonia cohort (Lag 0): 17.14/yglm3
Statistical Analyses: conditional
logistic regression
Monitoring Stations: 1
Pneumonia cohort (Lag 0): 16.32 /yglm3
Covariates: temperature, day of the
week.
Copollutant (correlation):
Percentage (%) increase in risk [95% CI]:
BC: r - 0.66
Myocardial infarction cohort:
Season: All, and also tested for
LagO: 8.50 (1.89-14.43)
interaction by warm (April-September)
NO?: r - 0.55
vs. cold season
CO: r - 0.52
Lag 0-1:8.65(1.22-15.38)
Dose-response Investigated: No
0s: r - 0.20
Pneumonia cohort:
Statistical Package: SAS version 8.2
(PR0C PHREG)
PM non-traffic: r - 0.74
LagO: 6.48 (1.13-11.43)
Lags Considered: lag 0 , and mean of
Lag 0-1: 5.56 (-0.45,11.27)
lags 0 -1
Notes: Assessed for effect modification
by season. Results are reported in Figure
2. Summary of results: PM2.6 is
associated with pneumonia
hospitalization in the cold season but not
the hot season. PM2.6 is associated with
Ml hospitalization in the hot season but
not the cold season.
Reference: Zanobetti and Schwartz
(2006,090195)
Period of Study: 1995-1999
Location: Boston Metropolitan area
Outcome (ICD-9): Myocardial infarction
(410) or pneumonia (480-487)
Age Groups: 65 + years
Study Design: Case-crossover
N: 15,578 patients admitted for Ml and
25,857 admitted for pneumonia
Statistical Analyses: conditional
logistic regression
Covariates: temperature, day of the
week.
Season: All, and also assessed for
interaction by hot (April-September) vs.
cold season
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: SAS Software
Release 8.2
Lags Considered: lag 0 , and mean of
lags 0 -1
Pollutant: BC
Averaging Time: 24 h
Median l//g/m3) (IQR
5th-95th percentiles): 1.15 (0.74-1.72
0.42-2.83)
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation):
PM2.6: r - 0.66
NO2: r - 0.70
CO: r - 0.82
0a: r - -0.25
PM non-traffic: r - -0.01
PM Increment: Difference between the
90th and 10th percentile for BC
Myocardial infarction cohort (Lag 0): 2.01
Z^g/m3
Myocardial infarction cohort (Lag 0-1):
1.69/yg/m3
Pneumonia cohort (Lag 0): 2.05 //g|m3
Pneumonia cohort (Lag 0 -1): 1.69 /yglm3
Percentage (%) increase in risk [95% CI]:
Myocardial infarction cohort:
Lag 0:6.98 (-0.27-13.76)
Lag 0-1:8.34 (0.21-15.82)
Pneumonia cohort:
| Lag 0: 10.76(4.54-15.89)
Lag 0-1: 11.71 (4.79,17.36)
Notes: Assessed for effect modification
by season. Results are reported in Figure
2. Summary of results: PM2.BC is
associated with pneumonia
hospitalization in the cold season but not
the hot season. BC had a stronger
positive association with Ml
hospitalization in the cold season, but the
confidence interval was wide.
'All units expressed in //gfm3 unless otherwise specified.
Table E-8. Short-term exposure-cardiovascular-ED/HA-other size fractions.
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Andersen et al, (2008, Outcome (ICD-10): CVD, including angina Pollutant: Total number concentration of PM Increment: IQR increase in pollutant
189651) pectoris (I20), myocardial infarction (121- ultrafine and accumulation mode particles level: Nctot: 3907 particles/cm3 (IQR)
22), other acute ischemic heart diseases
July 2009
E-140
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
(NCtot) (particles/cm3)
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD
median
IQR
99th percentile:
NCtot*: 8116(3502
7358
5738-9645,19,895)
NCa12: 493 (315
463
308-650
1463)
Nca23: 2253(1364
2057
1280-3066
6096)
NCa57: 5104 (2687
4562
3248-6274
14,410)
NC100: 6847 (2864
6243
4959-8218
16189)
NCa2i2: 392 (441
89
246-584
2248)
*NC, number concentration
tot, total (all particles 6-700 in diameter)
a12, size mode with mean diameter of 12
nm
a23, size mode with median diameter of
23 nm
a57, size mode with median diameter of
57 nm
a212
size mode with median diameter of 212
nm
NC100 - a12+a23 + 0.797*a57+0.084
*a212.
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation): Correlation of
NCtot with:
PMio: r - 0.39
PM2.6: r - 0.40
NO2: r - 0.68
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Period of Study: May 2001-December
2004
Location: Los Angeles and San
counties, California
(124), chronic ischaemic heart disease
(125), pulmonary embolism (I26), cardiac
arrest (I46), cardiac arrhythmias (I48-
48), and heart failure (I50).
RD, including chronic bronchitis (J41-
42), emphysema (J43), other chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease (J44),
asthma (J45), and status asthmaticus
(J46).
Pediatric hospital admissions for asthma
(J45) and status asthmaticus (J46).
Age Groups: > 65 yrs (CVD and RD), 5-
18 years (asthma)
Study Design: Time series
l\l:NR
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM
Covariates: temperature, dew-point
temperature, long-term trend,
seasonality, influenza, day of the week,
public holidays, school holidays (only for
5-18 year olds), pollen (only for pediatric
asthma outcome)
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: R statistical
software (gam procedure, mgcv package)
Lags Considered: Lag 0 -5 days, 4-day
pollutant avg (lag 0 -3) for CVD, 5-day
avg (lag 0-4) for RD, and a 6-day avg (lag
0-5) for asthma.
Nca12: 342 particles/cm3 (IQR)
Nca23: 1786 particles/cm3 (IQR)
Nca57: 3026 particles/cm3 (IQR)
NC100: 3259 particles/cm3 (IQR)
Nca212: 495 particles/cm3 (IQR)
Relative risk (RR) Estimate [CI]: CVD
hospital admissions (4 day avg, lag 0 -3),
age 65 +
One-pollutant model (NCtot): 1.00 [0.99—
1.02]
Adj for PM10: 0.98 [0.96-1.01]
Adj for PM2.6: 0.99 [0.95-1.03]
Adj for CO: 0.99 [0.97-1.02]
Adj for NO2: 1.01 [0.98-1.03]
Adj for 0s: 1.01 [0.96-1.06]
One-pollutant model (NC100): 1.00
[0.98-1.02]
One pollutant model (Nca12): 0.99 [.97-
1.01]
Adj for other size fractions: 0.99 [0.97-
1.02]
One pollutant model (Nca23): 0.99 [0.96—
1.01]
Adj for other size fractions: 0.99 [0.96-
1.02]
One pollutant model (NCa57): 1.01
[0.98-1.02]
Adj for other size fractions: 0.99 [0.97-
1.02]
One pollutant model (Nca212): 1.02
[1.00-1.04]
Adj for other size fractions: 1.02 [1.00-
1.05]
Adj for PM10: 0.98 [0.95-1.01]
RD hospital admissions (5 day avg, lag 0 -
4), age 65+: One-pollutant model: 1.04
[1.00-1.07]
Adj for PM10:1.00 [0.96-1.05]
Adj for PM2.6: 0.97 [0.89-1.05]
Adj for CO: 1.03 [0.98-1.07]
Adj for NO2: 1.00(0.95-1.05]
Adj for 0a: 0.95(0.87-1.04]
One pollutant model (NC100): 1.03
[0.99-1.07]
One pollutant model (Nca12): 1.01 [0.98—
1.05]
Adj for other size fractions: 1.01 [0.97-
1.05]
One pollutant model (Nca23): 0.99 [0.94—
1.03]
Adj for other size fractions: 0.98 [0.94-
1.03]
One pollutant model (Nca57): 1.04 [1.00—
July 2009
E-141
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
NOx: r - 0.66
NC100: r - 0.98
NCa12: r - 0.31
NCa23: r - 0.57
NCa57: r - 0.87
NCa2i2: r - 0.29
CO: r - 0.54
NOx curbside: r - 0.36
Os: r - -0.12
Other variables: Temperature: r - -0.06
Relative humidity: r - -0.04
1.08]
Adj for other size fractions: 1.02 [0.97—
1.06]
One pollutant model (Nca212): 1.04
[1.01-1.08]
Adj for other size fractions: 1.03 [0.99—
1.07]
Adj for PMio: 1.01 [0.96-1.07]
Asthma hospital admissions (6 day avg
lag 0-5), age 5-18: One-pollutant model:
1.07 [0.98-1.17]
Adj for PMio: 1.03 [0.92-1.15]
Adj for PM2.6: 1.04 [0.85-1.28]
Adj for CO: 1.09 [0.99-1.21]
Adj for NO2: 1.07(0.96-1.19]
Adj for O3: 1.08 [0.87-1.35]
One pollutant model (NC100): 1.06
[0.97-1.16]
One pollutant model (Nca212): 1.08
[0.99-1.18]
Adj for other size fractions: 1.07 [0.97—
1.19]
One pollutant model (Nca23): 1.09 [0.98—
1.21]
Adj for other size fractions: 1.08 [0.97—
1.21]
One pollutant model (Nca57): 1.02 [0.94—
1.12]
Adj for other size fractions: 0.93 [0.83—
1.04]
One pollutant model (Nca212): 1.08
[1.00-1.17]
Adj for other size fractions: 1.12 [1.02-
1.23]
Adj for PMio: 1.10(0.96-1.13]
Notes: Figure 2: Relative risks and 95%
confidence intervals per IQR in single day
concentration (0-5 day lag).
Summary of Figure 2: CVD: Positive,
marginally or statistically significant
associations at Lag 2 (Nctot, Nca57,
Nca212), Lag 3 (Nca212), and Lag 1
(Nca212). RD: Positive, statistically or
marginally significant associations at Lag
4 (Nctot, Nca57, NCa212) and Lag 5
(Nctot, Nca57, Nca212), and to a lesser
extent Lag 2 (Nctot, Nca212) and Lag 3
(Nctot, Nca212). Asthma: Wide
confidence intervals make interpretation
difficult. Positive, significant association
for Nca212 at Lag 1.
July 2009
E-142
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Lanki et al. (2006, 089788) Outcome (ICD-9): Acute myocardial
infarction (410
Period of Study: 1992-2000
Location: Augsburg, Barcelona, Helsinki,
Rome, and Stockholm
ICD-10:121,122)
Age Groups: 35+ yrs,
< 75 yrs, 75+ yrs
Study Design: Time series
N: 26,854 hospitalizations
Statistical Analyses: GAM
Covariates: Temperature, barometric
pressure
Season: Warm (Apr-Sep) and cold (Oct-
Mar)
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: R package mgcv
0.9-5
Lags Considered: 0-3 days
Pollutant: UFP (PNC)
Averaging Time: 24 h
Median particles/cm3: Augsburg: 12,400
Barcelona: 76,300
Helsinki: 13,600
Rome: 46,000
Stockholm: 11,800
Copollutant (correlation): Augsburg
PMio: r - 0.53
CO: r - 0.63
NO2: r - 0.65
0s: r - 0.26
Barcelona: PMio: r - 0.38
CO: r - 0.80
NO?: r - 0.49
O3: r - -0.35
Helsinki: PMio: r - 0.45
CO: r - 0.48
NO2: r - 0.82
Os: r - 0.01
Rome: PMio: r - 0.32
CO: r - 0.83
NO2: r - 0.68
O3: r = 0.03
Stockholm: PMio: r - 0.06
CO: r - 0.56
NO2: r - 0.83
Os: r - -0.01
PM Increment: 10,000 particles/cm3
Pooled Rate Ratio [CI]: All 5 cities (35 +
yrs)
Same-day lag: 1.005 [0.996,1.015]
1-day lag: 0.997 [0.982,1.012]
2-day lag: 0.999 [0.990,1.008]
3-day lag: 0.998 [0.979,1.017]
3 cities with hospital discharge register
(35+ yrs)
Same-day lag: 1.013 [1.000,1.026]
1-day lag: 0.995 [0.953,1.039]
2-day lag: 1.001 [0.989,1.014]
3-day lag: 1.009 [0.974,1.046]
Warm season (35+ yrs)
Same-day lag: 1.009 [0.972,1.048]
1-day lag: 1.023(0.988,1.060];
2-day lag: 1.050 [1.016,1.085]
3-day lag: 1.022 [0.987,1.058]
Cold season (35+ yrs)
Same-day lag: 1.014(1.001,1.028]
1-day lag: 1.001 [0.956,1.048]
2-day lag: 1.001 [0.989,1.014]
3-day lag: 1.009 [0.971,1.049]
Age >75Non-fatal
Same-day lag: 1.032 [1.008,1.056]
1-day lag: 1.009 [0.985,1.032]
2-day lag: 0.989 [0.966,1.013]
3-day lag: 1.009 [0.969,1.051]
Fatal
Same-day lag: 1.016 [0.978,1.055]
1-day lag: 1.001 [0.966,1.038]
2-day lag: 1.005 [0.969,1.041]
3-day lag: 0.984 [0.948,1.021]
Notes: Rate ratios for PNC are given for
0-5 lag days in graph form (Fig 1) for
each city. Pooled rate ratios were also
provided for groups < 75 yielding similar
results to the overall 3-city data.
July 2009
E-143
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Metzgeret al. (2004,
044222)
Period of Study: August 1998-August
2000
Location: Atlanta Metropolitan area
(Georgia)
Outcome (ICD-9): Emergency visits for
ischemic heart disease (410-414),
cardiac dysrhythmias (427), cardiac
arrest (427.5), congestive heart failure
(428), peripheral vascular and
cerebrovascular disease (433-437, 440,
443-444, 451-453), atherosclerosis
(440), and stroke (436).
Age Groups: All
Study Design: Time series
N: 4,407,535 emergency department
visits between 1993-2000 (data not
reported for 1998-2000)
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
generalized linear modeling
Covariates: Day of the week, hospital
entry and exit indicator variables,
federally observed holidays, temporal
trends, temperature, dew point
temperature
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 3-day moving avg,
lags 0-7
Pollutant: UFP (10-100 nm particle
count) (no/cm3)
Averaging Time: 24 h
Median (10%-90% range): 25,900
(11,500-74,600)
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation): PMio: r - -
0.13
0s: r - -0.13
NO2: r - 0.26
CO: r - 0.10
SO2: r - 0.24
PM2.6: r - -0.16
PM2.6 water soluble metals: r - -0.27
PM2.6 sulfates: r - -0.31;
PM2.6 acidity: r - -0.39;
PM2.6 organic carbon: r - 0.08;
PM2.6 elemental carbon: r - 0.08;
PM2.6 oxygenated hydrocarbon: r - 0.05
Other variables: Temperature: r - -0.33
Dew point: r - -0.41
PM Increment: 30,000 no/cm3
(approximately 1 SD|3
RR [95% CI]: For 3 day moving avg: All
CVD: 0.985 [0.965,1.005]
Dysrhythmia: 0.972 [0.937,1.008]
Congestive heart failure: 0.983 [0.943-
1.025]
Ischemic heart disease: 0.989 [0.953—
1.026]
Peripheral vascular and cerebrovascular
disease: 0.998 [0.960-1.039]
Results for Lags 0-7 expressed in figures
(see notes).
Notes: Figure 1: RR (95% CI) for single-
day lag models for the association of ER
visits for CVD with daily ambient UFP.
Summary of Figure 1 results: Null or
negative associations.
July 2009
E-144
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: von Klot et al. (2005,
088070)
Period of Study: 1992-2001
Location: Augsburg, Germany
Barcelona, Spain
Helsinki, Finland
Rome, Italy
Stockholm, Sweden
Outcome (ICD-9): Acute myocardial
infarction (410
ICD-10:121-I22), angina pectoris (411,
413
ICD-10:120,124), dysrhythmia (427
ICD-10:146.0, 46.9,147-I49, R00.1,
R00.8), heart failure (428
ICD-10: 150)
Age Groups: 35+ yrs
Study Design: Cohort
N: 22,006 Ml survivors
Statistical Analyses: GAM, Spearman
correlation
Covariates: Temperature, dew point
temp, avg barometric pressure, relative
humidity
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: R-software with
"mgcv"package
Lags Considered: 0-3 days
'All units expressed in //gfm3 unless otherwise specified.
Pollutant: UFP (PNC) PM Increment: 10,000 particles/cm3
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean particle/cm3 (5th-95th percentile): Pooled RR Estimate [CI]:
Augsburg: All cardiac admissions: 1.026
[1.005,1.048]
Barcelona:
Myocardial infarction: 1.039
Helsinki: [0.998.1.082]
R°me: Angina pectoris: 1.020 [0.992,1.048]
Stockholm:
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant (correlation):
Augsburg
PMio: r - 0.52
CO: r - 0.63
NO?: r - 0.64
O3: r —-0.32Barcelona
PM10: r - 0.29
CO: r - 0.71;
NO?: r - 0.44
O3: r — -0.55
Helsinki
PM10: r - 0.46
CO: r - 0.47;
NO2: r - 0.83
0s: r —-0.16
Rome
PM10: r = 0.33
CO: r - 0.80;
NO2: r - 0.71
0s: r — -0.47
Stockholm
PM10: r - 0.06
CO: r - 0.54;
NO2: r - 0.80
0s: r — -0.17
July 2009
E-145
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
E.2. Short-Term Exposure and Respiratory Outcomes
E.2.1. Respiratory Morbidity Studies
Table E-9. Short-term exposure-respiratory morbidity outcomes -PM10
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Aekplakorn, et al. (2003,
089908)
Period of Study: 107 days, from
October 1,1997 to January 15,1998
Location: Mae Mo district, Lampang
Province, North Thailand
Outcome: Upper respiratory symptoms,
lower respiratory symptoms, cough
Age Groups: 6-14 years old
Study Design: Logistic regression
l\l: 98 asthmatic school children, 98 non-
asthmatic school children
Statistical Analyses: GEE, stratified
analysis, PR0C GENM0D
Covariates: Temperature and relative
humidity
Season: winter
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS v 8.1
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: daily
Mean (SD):
Sob Pad station: 31.92
Sob Mo station: 33.64
Hua Fai station: 37.45
Range (Min, Max):
Sob Pad: 6.63,153.25
Sob Mo: 4.23,121.80
Hua Fai: 6.98,113.30
Monitoring Stations: 3
Copollutant: PM2.6, SO2
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3
Odds Ratios [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Asthmatics: URS: 1.03 (0.99,1.07)
lag 0
LRS: 1.04 (0.99,1.09)
lag 0
Cough: 1.04 (1.00,1.07)
lag 0
Non-Asthmatics: URS: 1.04 (0.99,1.08)
lag 0
LRS: 1.0(0.93,1.07)
lag 0
Cough: 0.99 (0.94,1.05)
lag 0
PM10 + SO2
Asthmatics: URS: 1.03 (0.99,1.07)
lag 0
LRS: 1.03 (0.98,1.09)
lag 0
Cough: 1.04 (1.00,1.08)
lag 0
Non-Asthmatics: URS: 1.04 (0.99,1.08)
lag 0
LRS: 1.0(0.93,1.07)
lag 0
Cough: 0.99 (0.95,1.05)
lag 0
July 2009
E-146
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Andersen et al. (2008,
189651)
Outcome: Daily symptoms (prospective
daily recording of symptoms via diary)
Period of Study: Dec 12,1998-Dec 19, Age Groups: 0-3 yrs
2004
Location: Copenhagen
Study Design: Panel study of children
with genetic susceptibility to asthma
(mothers had asthma)
N: 205 children (living within a 15km
radius of the central monitor during the
first 3 yrs of life)
born between Aug 2,1998 and Dec 12,
2001
Statistical Analyses: logistic regression
model (GEE)
Covariates: temperature, season,
gender, age, exposure to smoking, and
paternal history of asthma
Effect modification: gender, medication
use, and paternal history of asthma
Statistical Package: SAS v9.1
Lag: 0,1,2,3,4,2-4
Pollutant: PMio
Mean: 25.1
SD: 16.7
Percentiles:
25th: 15.7
75th: 30.2
IQR: 14.5
Copollutant (correlation): PM2.6
(r - 0.79)
Number concentration of ultrafine
particles,
UFP (r - 0.37)
NO? (r - 0.43)
NOx (r - 0.40)
CO (r - 0.45)
Os (r - -0.32)
Temp (r - 0.25)
PM Increment: IQR (14.5 |Jg|m )
increase
Odds Ratios (95%CI) for incident
wheezing symptoms
Age 0-1
LO: 1.05(0.88,1.25)
L1: 1.00(0.82,1.22)
L2: 1.01 (0.83,1.23)
L3: 1.20(0.98,1.46)
L4: 1.23(1.02,1.48)
L2-4:1.21 (0.99,1.48)
Age 1-2
LO: 1.00(0.86,1.15)
L1: 1.02(0.87,1.19)
L2: 1.05(0.93,1.19)
L3: 0.96(0.84,1.09)
L4: 1.04 (0.90,1.21)
L2-4:1.03 (0.88,1.22)
Age 2-3
LO: 0.87(0.72,1.06)
L1: 0.95(0.78,1.15)
L2: 0.99(0.82,1.17)
L3: 1.03(0.84,1.25)
L4: 0.89(0.74,1.09)
L2-4: 0.94 (0.74,1.19)
Age 0-3
LO: 0.97(0.87,1.08)
L1: 0.99(0.89,1.10)
L2: 1.01 (0.92,1.12)
L3: 1.03(0.93,1.14)
L4: 1.04 (0.94,1.15)
L2-4:1.04 (0.92,1.17)
Two pollutant models (lag 2-4)
1 -pollutant model: 1.21 (0.99,1.48)
2-pollutant (adj for NO2): 1.13 (0.88,
1.45)
2-pollutant (adj for NOx): 1.16 (0.90,
1.48)
2-pollutant (adj for CO): 1.23 (0.96,1.57)
110 children living within 5km radius
from monitor (sensitivity analysis): Age 0-
1: 1.32(0.95,1.82)
Age 1-2: 1.20(0.87,1.67)
Age 2-3: 0.78(0.52,1.16)
Age 0-3: 1.11 (0.88,1.39)
Reference: Boezen et al. (2005,
087396)
Period of Study: Two consecutive
Outcome: FEVi, airway
hyperresponsiveness (AHR), serum total
IgE and daily data on lower respiratory
symptoms (LRS), upper respiratory
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24 h
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
AHR-|lgE-
July 2009
E-147
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
winters (winter 1993-winter 1995)
Location: rural (Meppel, Nunspeet) and
urban (Amsterdam) areas in the
Netherlands
symptoms (URS), cough and morning and
evening peak expiratory flow
Age Groups: 50-70 years
Study Design: Case-control study
N: 327 patients
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression
Covariates: daily minimum temperature,
linear, quadratic and cubic time trend,
weekend/holidays, and influenza
incidence for the rural and urban areas
and two winters separately
Season: winter
Dose-response Investigated? No
Lags Considered: 0,1, 2, and 5-day
mean
Mean (SD):
Winter 93194 Urban: 41.5
Winter 93194 Rural: 44.1
Winter 94195 Urban: 31.1
Winter 94195 Rural: 26.6
Percentiles: 50th(Median):
Winter 93194 Urban: 34.6
Winter 93194 Rural: 30.4
Winter 94195 Urban: 28.9
Winter 94195 Rural: 23.7
Range (Min, Max):
93194 Urban: (12.1-112.7)
93194 Rural: (7.9-242.2)
94195 Urban: (8.8-89.9)
94195 Rural: (7.1-96.9)
Copollutant:
SO?
NO?
Black Smoke
Upper Respiratory Symptoms
Lag 0: OR - 0.99 (0.97-1.01)
Lag 1: OR - 1.01 (0.99-1.03)
Lag 2: OR - 1.00 (0.96-1.02)
5-day mean: OR - 1.00 (0.96-1.04)
Cough
Lag 0: OR - 1.00(0.99-1.02)
Lag 1: OR - 0.99(0.98-1.01)
Lag 2: OR - 1.00(0.98-1.01)
5-day mean: OR - 0.98 (0.95-1.01)
>10% fall in morning peak expiratory
flow
Lag 1: OR - 1.01 (0.98-1.04)
Lag 2: OR - 0.97 (0.94-1.00)
5-day mean: OR - 0.97 (0.92-1.02)
AHR-/lgE +
Upper Respiratory Symptoms
Lag 0: OR - 1.01 (0.99-1.03)
Lag 1: OR - 1.02(1.00-1.04)
Lag 2: OR - 1.01 (0.99-1.03)
5-day mean: OR - 1.08 (1.04-1.11)
Cough
Lag 0: OR - 1.01 (0.99-1.03)
Lag 1: OR - 0.99(0.98-1.01)
Lag 2: OR - 1.00 (0.98-1.02)
5-day mean: OR - 1.01 (0.97-1.05)
>10% fall in morning peak expiratory
flow
Lag 1: OR - 0.99 (0.97-1.02)
Lag 2: OR - 0.99 (0.97-1.02)
5-day mean: OR - 0.97 (0.93-1.01)
AHR+|lgE-
Upper Respiratory Symptoms
Lag 0: OR - 0.99 (0.95-1.03)
Lag 1: OR - 1.01 (0.97-1.05)
Lag 2: OR - 0.99 (0.96-1.03)
5-day mean: OR - 0.98 (0.91-1.06)
Cough
Lag 0: OR - 1.00 (0.97-1.02)
Lag 1: OR - 1.01 (0.98-1.03)
Lag 2: OR - 0.99 (0.96-1.02)
5-day mean: OR - 1.02 (0.96-1.08)
>10% fall in morning peak expiratory
flow
Lag 1: OR - 0.99 (0.95-1.03)
Lag 2: OR - 0.99 (0.95-1.03)
July 2009
E-148
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
5-day mean: OR - 0.99 (0.93-1.06)
AHR+/lgE +
Upper Respiratory Symptoms
Lag 0: OR - 1.01 (0.98-1.04)
Lag 1: OR - 1.03(1.00-1.05)
Lag 2: OR - 1.02 (0.99-1.05)
5-day mean: OR - 1.06 (1.00-1.11)
Oough
Lag 0: OR - 1.03(1.01-1.06)
Lag 1: OR - 1.00(0.98-1.02)
Lag 2: OR - 0.99 (0.97-1.01)
5-day mean: OR - 0.99 (0.95-1.04)
Lag 2: OR - 0.99 (0.96-1.03)
5-day mean: OR - 0.99 (0.92-1.05)
>10% fall in morning peak expiratory
flow
Lag 1: OR - 1.04(1.00-1.07)
Lag 2: OR - 1.03 (0.99-1.06)
5-day mean: OR - 1.05 (0.99-1.11)
Increment: 100 /yglm3
Odds Ratio (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag: OR for respiratory symptoms and
exposure to PMio in children with BHR
and high serum total IgE
Lower Respiratory Symptoms
1.32(1.07,1.63)
0
1.36(1.13,1.64)
1
1.36(1.13,1.65)
2
2.39(1.71,3.35)
0-5 avg.
Upper Respiratory Symptoms
1.13(0.97,1.32)
0
1.00(0.87,1.16)
1
0.96(0.84,1.11)
2
0.91 (0.70,1.18)
0-5 avg
>10% morning peak expiratory flow
(PEF) decrease
1.10(0.92,1.33)
0
1.08(0.90,1.28)
Reference: Boezen et al. (1999,
040410)
Periods of Study: 3 Winters (1992-
1995)
Location: Urban and rural areas of the
Netherlands
Outcome: Respiratory symptoms
Pollutant: PMio
Lower respiratory symptoms (wheeze,
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
attacks of wheezing, shortness of breath)
Mean (SD):
Upper respiratory symptoms (sore throat,
Winter 1992-93
runny or blocked nose)
Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR)
Urban: 54.8
Study Design: Time-series
Rural: 44.7
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
Winter 1993-94
regression (PROC model)
Urban: 41.5 3
Age Groups: 7-11
Rural: 44.1
Winter 1994-95
Urban: 31.1
Rural: 26.6
Range (Min, Max):
Winter 1992-93
Urban: (4.7,145.6)
Rural: (4.8,103.8)
Winter 1993-94
Urban: (12.1,112.7)
Rural: (7.9, 242.2)
Winter 1994-95
Urban: (8.8, 89.9)
Rural: (7.1,96.9)
Copollutants:
BS
SO?
NO?
July 2009
E-149
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
1
1.03(0.87,1.23)
2
1.10(0.83,1.46)
0-5 avg
> 10% evening peak expiratory flow
(PEF) increase
1.37 (1.16,1.63)
0
1.09(0.92,1.29)
1
1.16(0.98. 1.36)
2
1.35(1.04,1.77)
0-5 avg.
OR for respiratory symptoms and
exposure to PMio in children without BHR
and low serum total IgE
Lower Respiratory Symptoms
1.08(0.75,1.57)
0
1.04 (0.70,1.53)
1
0.98(0.69,1.39)
2
1.15(0.61,2.15)
0-5 avg.
Upper Respiratory Symptoms
1.12(0.99,1.28)
0
1.01 (0.89,1.15)
1
1.01 (0.89,1.15)
2
0.93(0.67,1.28)
0-5 avg
>10% morning PEF decrease
1.07 (0.93,1.23)
0
0.86 (0.75, 0.99)
1
0.97 (0.85,1.11)
2
0.99(0.79,1.23)
0-5 avg
>10% evening PEF decrease
July 2009
E-150
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
1.13(0.98,1.30)
0
1.05(0.91,1.21)
1
0.99(0.87,1.14)
2
0.94 (0.75,1.17)
0-5 avg
OR for respiratory symptoms and
exposure to PMio in children with BHR
and low serum total IgE
Lower Respiratory Symptoms
0.77 (0.48,1.24)
0
1.34 (0.94,1.93)
1
1.24 (0.86,1.81)
2
1.92(0.84,4.41)
0-5 avg
Upper Respiratory Symptoms
1.13(0.92,1.40)
0
0.98(0.79,1.22)
1
0.97 (0.79,1.20)
2
0.83(0.54,1.25)
0-5 avg
>10% morning PEF decrease
1.04 (0.78,1.38)
0
0.86(0.66,1.12)
1
0.91 (0.71,1.17)
2
0.78(0.51,1.20)
0-5 avg
>10% evening PEF decrease
1.07 (0.82,1.41)
0
0.98(0.76,1.26)
1
0.93(0.73,1.19)
2
0.83(0.55,1.26)
July 2009
E-151
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
0-5 avg
OR for respiratory symptoms and
exposure to PMio in children without BHR
and high serum total IgE
Lower Respiratory Symptoms
1.04 (0.80,1.35)
0
1.21 (0.98,1.51)
1
1.18(0.96,1.45)
2
1.35(0.89, 2.04)
0-5 avg
Upper Respiratory Symptoms
1.01 (0.85,1.20)
0
0.95(0.81,1.12)
1
0.93(0.80,1.09)
2
0.93(0.69,1.25)
0-5 avg
>10% morning PEF decrease
0.97 (0.80,1.17)
0
1.09(0.91,1.30)
1
1.02(0.85,1.21)
2
0.95(0.71,1.28)
0-5 avg
>10% evening PEF decrease
1.02(0.85,1.22)
0
1.06(0.90,1.25)
1
1.08(0.93,1.27)
2
1.04 (0.80,1.34)
0-5 avg.
Reference: Chattopadhyay et al. (2007,
Outcome: pulmonary function tests
Pollutant: PMio
PM Increment: NR
147471)
(respiratory impairments)
Averaging Time: 8 h
Respiratory impairments (SD): North
Period of Study: NR
Age Groups: All ages
Mean (SD):
Kolkata
Location: Three different points in
Study Design: Cross-sectional
North Kolkata: 535.9
Male (n - 137)
Kolkata, India: North, South, and Central
N: 505 people studied for PFT
Restrictive: 4 (2.92)
Central Kolkata: 1114.5
total population of Kolkata not given
South Kolkata: 909.2
Obstructive: 5 (3.64)
July 2009
E-152
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Statistical Analyses: Frequencies
Covariates: Meteorologic data (i.e.
temperature, wind direction, wind speed,
and humidity)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant:
PM < 10-3.3
PM< 3.3-0.4
Combined Res. And Obs.: 6 (4.37)
Total: 15(10.95)
Female (n - 152)
Restrictive: 3 (1.97)
Obstructive: 5 (3.28)
Combined Res. And Obs.: n/a
Total: 8 (5.26)
Total (n - 289)
Restrictive: 7 (2.42)
Obstructive: 10 (3.46)
Combined Res. And Obs.: 6 (2.07)
Total: 23 (7.96)
Central Kolkata
Male (n - 44)
Restrictive: 6 (13.63)
Obstructive: 1 (2.27)
Combined Res. And Obs.: 1 (2.27)
Total: 8(18.18)
Female (n - 50)
Restrictive: 3 (6.00)
Obstructive: 2 (4.00)
Combined Res. And Obs.: n/a
Total: 5(10.00)
Total (n - 94)
Restrictive: 9 (9.57)
Obstructive: 3 (3.19)
Combined Res. And Obs.: 1 (1.06)
Total: 13(13.82)
South Kolkata
Male (n - 52)
Restrictive: 1 (1.92)
Obstructive: 2 (3.84)
Combined Res. And Obs.: 3 (5.76)
Total: 6(11.53)
Female (n - 70)
Restrictive: 2 (2.85)
Obstructive: 1 (1.42)
Combined Res. And Obs.: n/a
Total: 3 (4.28)
Total (n - 122)
Restrictive: 3 (2.45)
Obstructive: 3 (2.45)
Combined Res. And Obs.: 3 (2.45)
Total: 9 (7.37)
July 2009
E-153
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Dales et al. (2006, 090744)
Period of Study: 1/1/1986-12/31/2000
Location: 11 Canadian Cities: Calgary,
Edmonton, Halifax, London, Hamilton,
Ottawa, St. John, Toronto, Vancouver,
Windsor, Winnipeg
Health Outcome: Respiratory Illness:
Asphyxia (799)
Respiratory failure (799.1)
Dyspnea and respiratory abnormalities
(786)
Respiratory distress syndrome (769)
Unspecified birth asphyxia in live-born
infant (768.9)
Other respiratory problems after birth
(770.8)
Pneumonia (486)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
Age Groups: 0-27 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Copollutants (correlation):
O3: r - -0.29 to 0.41
IMO2: r - -0.26 to 0.69
SO2: r - -0.09 to 0.61
CO: r--0.13 to 0.71
Increment: 10/yg/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
Lag
In respiratory illness and exposure to
PM10 in neonates
PM10 alone: 2.13 (-0.50,4.76)
Multipollutant model
PM10: 1.45 (-1.90,4.80)
PM10, O3: 2.67 (0.98, 4.39)
PM10, NO?: 2.48 (1.18,3.80)
PM10, SO2:1.41 (0.35,2.47)
PM10, CO: 1.30 (0.13, 2.49)
Reference: de Hartog et al. (2003,
001061)
Period of Study: winter of 1998-1999
(in Amsterdam, from November 2,1998
to June 18,1999
in Erfurt, from October 12,1998 to April
4,1999
and in Helsinki, from November 2,1998
to April 30,1999.)
Location: Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Erfurt, Germany
and Helsinki, Finland
Outcome: Respiratory symptoms
Age Groups: a 50 yrs
Study Design: panel
N: 131 subjects with history of coronary
heart disease
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression
Covariates: ambient temperature,
relative humidity, atmospheric pressure,
incidence of influenza-like illness
Season: Winter
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: S-PLUS 2000
Lags Considered: 0,1, 2, 3, and 5-day
avg
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): Amsterdam, the Netherlands:
36.5
Erfurt, Germany: 27.1
Helsinki, Finland: 19.6
Range (Min, Max):
Amsterdam, the Netherlands: (13.6-
112.0)
Erfurt, Germany: (5.2-104.2)
Helsinki, Finland: (6.4-67.4)
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant: PM2.6
NCo.010.1
CO
NO?
SO2
'There was a tendency toward positive
associations between avoidance of
activities and both particulate air
pollution (PM10) and gases, but none of
the associations were statistically
significant....In both incidence analyses
and prevalence analyses, odds ratios for
PM10 were generally similar to the
corresponding odds ratios for PM2.6, but
were somewhat less significant.'
July 2009
E-154
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Delfino et al. (1998, 051406) Outcome: asthma symptom severity
Period of Study: August 1 -October 30, Age Groups: 9-17
1995
Location: Alpine, CA
Study Design: Panel Study
N: 24 non smoking pediatric asthmatics
Statistical Analyses: GEE
Covariates: day of week, temperature,
humidity, wind speed
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 0-5, 0, 0-4
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD):
31 (8)
90th: 42
Range (Min, Max): 16, 54
Copollutant (correlation):
0s (r - 0.32)
PM Increment: 42/yglm3 (90th
percentile increase)
Asthma symptoms:
Everyone: 1.47 (0.90, 2.39) lag 0
Everyone: 1.73 (1.03, 2.89) lag 0-4
Less symptomatic: 2.47 (1.23-4.95) lag 0
Less symptomatic: 4.03 (1.22,13.33) lag
0-4
More symptomatic: 1.50 (0.80, 2.80) lag
0
More symptomatic: 1.95 (1.12, 3.43) lag
0-4
PMio + 03
Asthma symptoms: 1.31 (0.84, 2.06) lag
0
1.65(1.03, 2.66) lag 0-4
Less symptomatic: 2.08 (1.12-3.83) lag 0
Less symptomatic: 3.35 (1.06,10.51) lag
0-4
More symptomatic: 1.40 (0.77, 2.53) lag
0
More symptomatic: 1.87 (1.11, 3.13) lag
0-4
July 2009
E-155
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Delfino et al. (2002, 093740) Outcome: Asthma symptoms that
interfere with daily activities
Period of Study: March 1 through April
30,1996 Age Groups: 9-19 yrs
Location: Alpine, California (a semi-rural Study Design: Daily panel study
area)
N: 22 asthmatic children
Statistical Analyses: GEE
Covariates: temperature, relative
humidity, day-of-week trends, linear time
trend across the 61 days, and upper or
lower respiratory infection
Season: "early spring season" of March
through April
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: SAS, version 8
Lags Considered: 0,1, 2, 3,4, 5, 3-day
mov avg
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 1 h max
Mean (SD): 38(15)
Percentiles: 90th: 63
Range (Min, Max): (12-69)
Averaging Time: 8 h max
Mean (SD): 28(12)
Percentiles: 90th: 46
Range (Min, Max): (8-57)
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 20(9)
Percentiles: 90th: 32
Range (Min, Max): (7-42)
Copollutant (correlation): 1 h max
PMio: 8 h max PMio: r - 0.93
24 h PMio: r - 0.84
1 h max O3: r - 0.68
8 h max O3: r - 0.95
1 h max NO2: r - 0.49
8 h max NO2: r - 0.55
8 h max PMio: 1 h max PMio: r - 0.93
24 h PMio: r- 0.95
1 h max O3: r - 0.72
8 h max O3: r - 0.65
1 h max NO2: r - 0.48
8 h max NO2: r - 0.55
24 h PMio: 1 h max PMio: r - 0.84
8 h max PMio: r - 0.95
1 h max O3: r - 0.74
8 h max O3: r - 0.71
1 h max NO2: r - 0.37
8 h max NO2: r - 0.44
PM Increment: 90th percentile increase
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
ORs for risk of asthma symptoms in
those who report a respiratory infection
compared to those who do not have a
respiratory infection
1 h max PMio lag 0: 4.88 (1.31-18.2)
8 h max PMio lag 0: 6.78 (1.38-33.3)
24 h mean PMio lag 0: 4.68 (0.71-30.7)
3-day mov avg 1 h max PMio: 11.1 (1.10-
112)
3-day mov avg 8 h max PMio: 10.1 (1.42-
72.0)
3-day mov avg 24 h PMio: 2.67 (0.60-
11.8)
Effect modification by anti-inflammatory
medication use on the relationship of
asthma symptoms in children
1 h max PMio lag 0: 1.41 (0.87-2.30)
On medication: 0.96 (0.25-3.69)
Not on medication: 1.92 (1.22-3.02)
8 h max PMio lag 0: 1.19(0.74-1.94)
On medication: 0.75 (0.18-3.04)
Not on medication: 1.68 (0.91-3.09)
24 h mean PMio lag 0:1.08 (0.73-1.61)
On medication: 0.80 (0.24-2.69)
Not on medication: 1.35 (0.82-2.22)
3-day mov avg 1 h max PMio: 1.45 (0.76-
2.76)
On medication: 1.01 (0.14-7.02)
Not on medication: 1.92 (0.99-3.71)
3-day mov avg 8 h max PMio: 1.32 (0.76-
2.29)
On medication: 0.82 (0.17-3.94)
Not on medication: 1.89 (1.10-3.24)
3-day mov avg 24 h PMio: 1.22 (0.84-
1.77)
On medication: 0.75 (0.26-2.14)
Not on medication: 1.75(1.15-2.68)
Dose-response results are found in Figure
2 and not quantitatively reported
elsewhere.
July 2009
E-156
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Delfino et al. (2003, 090941)
Period of Study: November 1999 to
January 2000
Location: Huntington Park, Los Angeles
Outcome: Asthma severity scale
Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEF)
Age Groups: Ages 10 to 16
Study Design: Longitudinal study panel
N: 22 children
Statistical Analyses: Regression
analysis (GEE, GLM)
multivariate regression models
Covariates: Day of the week, Maximum
Temperature, Respiratory Infections
Season: Winter
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 0,1
Pollutant: PMio
Mean (SD): 59.9 (24.7)
Range (Min, Max):
20-126
IQR: 37
90th: 86.0
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation):
8-h max NO2 - 0.38
8-h max O3 - -0.16
8-h max CO - 0.50
8-h max SO2 - 0.73
PM Increment: IQR 37.0 /yglm3
OR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Lag 0
Symptom Scores > 1: 1.45 (1.11,1.90)
Symptom Scores >2: NR
Lag 1
Symptom Scores >1:1.07 (0.64,1.77)
Symptom Scores >2: NR
Reference: Delfino et al. (2004, 056897)
Period of Study: September-October
1999
April-June 2000
Location: Alpine, California
Outcome: FEVi
Age Groups: 9-19 years old
Study Design: Panel study
N: 24 children
Statistical Analyses: GLM
Akaike's information criterion and
Bayesian information criterion
Covariates: Day of week, Personal
temperature and relative humidity, time
of FEVi maneuver (morning, afternoon, or
evening), Season (fall 1999 or spring
2000)
As-needed medication use
Presence or absence of upper or lower
respiratory infections
Season: Spring, Fall
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: Lag 0-4
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, 24-h
Personal Monitor
1-h max personal PM last
24-h
Mean (SD): 151.0(12.03)
90th: 292.4
Range (Min, Max): (9.1, 996.8)
Mean personal PM last 24-h
Mean (SD): 37.9(19.9)
90th: 65.1
Range (Min, Max):
(3.9,113.8)
Central outdoor stationary-site PM
1-h Maximum TE0M
PM10 last 24-h
Mean (SD): 54.4(13.8)
90th: 71.0
Range (Min, Max): (24.4, 95.4)
Mean TE0M PM10 last 24-h
Mean (SD): 29.7 (8.6)
90th: 40.9
Range (Min, Max): (12.9, 50.7)
24-h mean PM10
Mean (SD): 23.6 (9.1)
90th: 34.6
Range (Min, Max): (3.2, 48.0)
Copollutant (correlation): 8-h max
personal PM
8-h max O3 - 0.03
8-h Max NO2 - 0.26
24-h Mean Personal
Results presented graphically: Percent
predicted FEVi was inversely associated
with personal exposure to fine particles.
¦ Inverse associations of FEVi with
stationary-site indoor, outdoor and
central-site gravimetric PM2.6 and PM10,
and with hourly TE0M PM10
July 2009
E-157
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
PM - 0.94
8-h Max TEOM PMio - 0.38
24-h Mean TEOM PMio - 0.40
24-h Central HI PMio - 0.37
24-h Central HI PM2.1, - 0.38
24-h Outdoor HI PMio - 0.32
24-h Outdoor HI PM2 b - 0.39
24-h Indoor HI PMio - 0.23
24-h Indoor HI PM2 b - 0.37
24-h mean personal PM
8-h max O3 - 0.01
8-h Max NO2 - 0.27
8-h Max Personal PM - 0.94
8-h Max TEOM PMio - 0.36
24-h Mean TEOM PMio - 0.39
24-h Central HI PMio - 0.36
24-h Central HI PM2.1, - 0.43
24-h Outdoor HI PMio - 0.34
24-h Outdoor HI PM2 b - 0.44
24-h Indoor HI PMio - 0.29
24-h Indoor HI PM2 b - 0.46
24-h Mean TEOM PMio
8-h max O3 - 0.41
8-h Max NO2 - 0.58
8-h Max Personal PM - 0.40
24-h Mean Personal PM - 0.39
8-h Max TEOM PMio - 0.92
24-h Central HI PMio - 0.86
24-h Central HI PM2.1, - 0.78
24-h Outdoor HI PMio - 0.79
24-h Outdoor HI PM2 b - 0.78
24-h Indoor HI PMio - 0.36
24-h Indoor HI PM2 b - 0.59
July 2009
E-158
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Delfino et al. (2006, 090745)
Period of Study: Region 1: August to
Mid December 2003. Region 2: July
through November 2004
Location: Region 1: Riverside, CA.
Region 2: Whittier, CA
Outcome: Fractional Concentration of
Nitric Oxide in exhaled air (FENO)
Age Groups: 9 through 18
Study Design: Longitudinal Panel Study
N: 45 children
Statistical Analyses: Linear mixed-
effects models
Two-stage hierarchical model
Empirical Variograms
Fourth-order polynomial distributed lag
mixed-effects model
Covariates: Personal temperature,
Personal Rel. Humid., 10-day exposure
run, Respiratory infections, Region of
study, Sex, Cumulative daily use of as-
needed B-agonist inhalers
Dose-response Investigated? No
Lags Considered: Lag 0, Lag 1, 2-day
moving avg
Pollutant: PMio
Central Site
Averaging Time: 24- h
Riverside
Mean (SD): 70.82 (29.36) 50th(Median):
65.96
Range (Min, Max): (30.75,
154.05) //g/m3
Whittier
Mean (SD): 35.73 (16.6) 50th(Median):
34.65
Range (Min, Max): (5.86,105.46) //g|m3
Monitoring Stations: 48 personal
nephelometers, 2 central sites
PM Increment: IQR increase (Riverside:
28.41 /yglm3, Whittier 21.87 /yg/m3)
Coefficient [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag: Lag - 2-day moving avg
Stratified by Medication Use
Not Taking Anti-lnflamm. Medication
Central 0.76 (-1.54, 3.07)
Taking Anti-lnflamm. Medication
Central 0.53 (-0.83,1.90)
Inhaled Corticosteroids
Central 1.28 (-0.01, 2.58)
Antileukotrienes +- inhaled
corticosteroids
Central-2.10 (-5.33,1.12)
Notes: Figure of Estimated lag effect of
hourly personal PM2.6 on FENO.
Figure of the Estimated lag effect of
hourly personal PM2.6 on FENO by use of
medications.
Figure of One- and two-pollutant models
for change in FENO using 2-day Moving
Averages personal and central-site
pollutant measurements.
July 2009
E-159
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Desqueyroux et al. (2002,
026052)
Period of Study: Nov 1995-Nov 1996
Location: Paris, France
Outcome: Asthma attacks
Age Groups: Adults.
Study Design: Panel study
N: 60 moderate to severe adult
asthmatics
Statistical Analyses: Marginal logistic
regression
Covariates: FEVi, smoking, allergy, oral
steroid treatment, mean daily
temperature, relative humidity, pollen
counts, season, holiday period
Season: winter, summer
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 3-5
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD):
Summer: 23 (9)
Winter: 28 (14)
Range (Min, Max):
Summer: 6, 63
Winter: 9, 84
Monitoring Stations: 7
Copollutant: SO2, NO2, O3
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3
OR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag: 0.87 [0.71,1.06] lag 1
0.93(0.80,1.08] lag 2
1.11(0.98,1.26] lag 3
1.17(1.03,1.33] lag 4
1.16(1.01,1.34] lag 5
1.21 (1.01,1.34]lag 3-5
vs seasons alone: Winter: 1.41 (1.16,
1.71] lag 3-5
summer: 1.03 (0.72,1.47] lag 3-5
vs link to explanatory factors: No link:
(1.71 (1.20, 2.43] lag 3-5
Link: 1.27 (1.06,1.52] lag 3-5
vs occurrence of infection: Without
infection: 1.52 (1.16, 2.00] lag 3-5
With infection: 1.30 (1.03,1.65] lag 3-5
vs baseline pulmonary function: FEVi
>1-68% predicted: 1.38(1.06,1.79]
lag 3-5
FEV <68% predicted: 1.45(1.11,1.90]
lag 3-5
vs smoking habits: Nonsmokers: 1.53
(1.18,1.98] lag 3-5
Current & ex-smokers: 1.18(0.90,1.54]
lag 3-5
vs allergy: Non-allergic: 1.29 (0.94,1.77]
lag 3-5
Allergic: 1.49(1.17,1.90] lag 3-5
vs regular oral steroid treatment: No:
1.41 (1.15,1.73] lag 3-5
Yes: 1.41 (0.88, 2.25] lag 3-5
Multipollutant model: PM10 + NO2: 1.43
[1.16,1.76] Lag 3-5
PM10 + SO2:1.51 [1.20,1.90] Lag 3-5
PM10 + 03:1.09 [0.71,1.67] Lag 3-5
Reference: Diette et al. (2007,156399) Outcome: Asthma in the last 12 months Pollutant: PM10
(493.x)
Period of Study: 912001-1212003
Location: East Baltimore, MD
Age Groups: 2 to 6 years old
Study Design: Prospective cohort
N: 150 with asthma
150 without asthma
Statistical Analyses: Student's two-
tailed t-test
Kruskal-Wallis test
Pearson's chi square
Fisher's exact test
Covariates: Season of collection
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: STATASE 8.0
Averaging Time: 72
50th(Median): 43.7
IQR: (29-70)
Notes: "Pollutant concentrations in the
homes of asthmatic and control children
who lived in the same home for their
whole life were not different compared
with those who had moved at least
July 2009
E-160
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ebelt et al. (2005, 056907)
Period of Study: summer of 1998
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Outcome: spirometry
Age Groups: range from 54-86 yrs
mean age - 74 years
Study Design: extended analysis of a
repeated-measures panel study
N: 16 persons with COPD
Statistical Analyses: Earlier analysis
expanded by developing mixed-effect
regression models and by evaluating
additional exposure indicators
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS V8
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): Ambient PMio: 17 (6)
Exposure to ambient PMio: 10.3 (4.6)
Range (Min, Max): Ambient PMio: (7-36)
Exposure to ambient PMio: (1.5-23.8)
Monitoring Stations: 5
Copollutant (correlation): Ambient
PM 10-2.5: r - 0.69
Ambient PM2.6: r - 0.78
Exposure to Ambient PMio: r - 0.71
PM Increment: Ambient PMio: 7 (IQR)
Exposure to ambient PMio: 6.5 (IQR)
Notes: Effect estimates are presented in
Figure 2 and Electronic Appendix Table 1
(only available with electronic version of
article) and not provided quantitatively
elsewhere.
Reference: Fischer et al. (2007,
156435)
Period of Study: 7 weeks (dates not
specified)
Location: Netherlands
Outcome: Respiratory Symptoms, Sore
throat, Runny nose, Cold, Sick at home
Study Design: Prospective cohort
N: 68
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression
model (PR0C mixed)
Age Groups: 10-11
Lag: 1-2
Statistical Package: SAS v 6.11
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): 56 /yglm3
IQ (25th, 75th):
(21,187)/yg/m3
Copollutants:
BS
NO?
CO
NO
Increment: 10/yg/m3
% Increase in eNO and PMio and change
in spirometric lung function
eNO and PMio only
6.5(0.9,12.4)
1
7.8(-11.3, 31.0)
2
FVC mean (SEM)
0.4 (0.5)
1
0.6(1.6)
2
FEVi mean (SEM)
¦0.3(0.5)
1
¦2.1 (1.9)
2
PEF mean (SEM)
¦2.8(3.3)
1
7.1 (12.0)
2
MMEF mean (SEM1-0.5 (1.7)
1
¦2.5(5.9)
2
July 2009
E-161
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Forsberg et al. (1998, Outcome: Respiratory Symptoms, Pollutant: PMio
051714) Shortness of breath
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Period of Study: 1/3/1994-3/27/1994 Wheeze, Asthma attacks, Recent asthma,
Dry cough, Doctor-diagnosed asthma, Mean (SD):
Location: Urban and rural areas of Umea, Recently treated for asthma, Early chest ,, , 1Q/1 ,3
Sweden j||ness Urban: 13.4/yg/m
Study Design: Cohort panel "ura''
Statistical Analyses: Logistic linear Range (Min, Max),
regression Urban: (0, 40.5)/yg/m3
Age Groups: 6-12 Rura|. (1 6, 29.0)/yg/m3
Copollutants (correlation):
BS: r - 0.73
July 2009
E-162
Increment: 10/yg/m3
OR between prevalence of acute
respiratory symptoms and PM10 exposure
for urban and rural children
lag
Urban children - Cough: 1.031 (0.957,
1.112)
0
0.997 (0.923,1.077)
1
1.018(0.940,1.1031:2
1.094 (0.895,1.338)
0-6 avg
Phlegm: 0.998 (0.899,1.108)
0
1.035 (0.928,1.154)
1
1.121 (1.013,1.240)
2
1.043 (0.822,1.324)
0-6 avg
Upper respiratory symptoms: 1.004
(0.949,1.063)
0
0.975(0.922,1.031)
1
0.951 (0.895,1.010)
2
0.849 (0.687,1.050)
0-6 avg
Lower respiratory symptoms: 0.984
(0.872,1.110)
0
0.919(0.812,1.039)
1
0.894 (0.771,1.036)
2
0.800 (0.617,1.038)
0-6 avg
Rural children (control)
Cough: 0.997 (0.900,1.105)
0
1.003 (0.906,1.112)
1
0.997 (0.891,1.116)
2
0.855 (0.655,1.115)
0-6 avg
Phlegm: 1.024 (0.880,1.192)
° DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
0.995 (0.853,1.160)
1
1.117(0.956,1.305)
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Goncalves et al. (2005,
089884)
Period of Study: Dec-Mar 1992/93.
Dec-Mar 1993194
Location: Sao Paulo
Outcome: Respiratory
morbidity/admissions
Age Groups: Children < 13 yrs
Study Design: Time series
Statistical Analyses: Principal
component analysis
Covariates: Daily mean temperature,
daily mean water vapor density, solar
radiation
Season: summer
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: Lag 3
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Copollutant: SO2,03
PCA coefficients: PC1, PC2, PC3:
Summer 199211993: PM10: 0.69, 0.45,
0.13
Solar Radiation: -0.04, 0.94 to -0.12
Mean Temperature: 0.62, 0.44 to -0.47
Mean Water Vapor Density: 0.73 to -0.46
to-0.26
SO2: 0.78 to-0.03, 0.33
03:0.18,0.63,0.37
Respiratory Mortality: 0.05 to -0.02,
0.81
Variations explained by Principal
Component: PC 1: 0.29
PC2: 0.27
PC3: 0.17
Summer 1993/1994: PM10: 0.38, 0.80 to
¦0.23
Solar Radiation: 0.02, 0.09 to -0.97
Mean Temperature: 0.71, 0.40 to -0.37
Mean Water Vapor Density: 0.88, 0.25,
0.09
SO2: 0.01, 0.92, 0.00
O3: 0.47 to -0.06 to -0.35
Respiratory Mortality: -0.73, 0.11, 0.08
Variations explained by Principal
Component: PC 1: 0.31
PC2: 0.25
PC3: 0.18
Notes: Association between respiratory
morbidity and air pollution more likely
during summer with smaller contrasts in
synoptic weather condition (summer
1992/93) but respiratory morbidity more
related to weather variables during
summer with larger contrasts (summer
1993/94).
Reference: Gordian and Choudhury
(2003, 054842)
Period of Study: 1994-Dec 1996
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Outcome: Asthma medication among
school children
Age Groups: Elementary school children
(kindergarten-6th grade)
Study Design: Time series
Statistical Analyses: Time series
regression model
Covariates: Day of the week, month,
time trend, temperature
Season: All seasons
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 1, 2, 7,14, 21, 28
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 36.11 (30.46)
Range (Min, Max): 2.96, 210.0
Monitoring Stations: 1
Model regression slope coefficient for
PM10 (estimated SE)
7.25(2.88)
lag 21
RR: 1.075 (1.016,1.138)
Notes: PM10 coefficients for other lags
were also statistically significant but not
reported.
July 2009
E-163
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Harre et al. (1997, 095726) Outcome: Respiratory symptoms, Cough, Pollutant: PMio
Wheeze, Chest tightness, Shortness of
breath, Change in sputum volume, Nose,
throat, or eye irritation, PEFR
Period of Study: 6/1994-8/1994
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Study Design: Prospective cohort
Statistical Analyses: Poisson, log linear
regression
Age Groups: >55
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Copollutants:
CO
SO?
NO?
Increment: 35.04//g/m3
Relative Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Chest symptoms: 1.38 (1.07,1.78)
1
Wheeze: 0.97 (0.75,1.26)
1
Nebulizer Use: 0.71 (0.42,1.18)
1
Inhaler Use: 0.94 (0.78,1.13)
1
Reference: Hastings and Jardine (2002,
030344)
Period of Study: 1997-1998
Location: Bosnia (US military camps)
Outcome: Weekly rates of upper
respiratory disease (URD), reported by
the medical treatment facility in each
military camp
Age Groups: US soldiers
Study Design: Ecologic (at level of
military camp)
N: 5 camps
Statistical Analyses: I.Pearson
correlations between weekly URD rates
and weekly PMio (avg and max)
2.Kruskal Wallace test to compare URD
rates in the 4 exposure quartiles
3. Mann Whitney test to compare
dichotomized exposure groups (above and
below 50th percentile)
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Lags Considered: Weekly rates of URD
disease were related to avg weekly PM
levels in the same week
Pollutant: PMio
Mean (SD):
PMio avg: 75.5
PMio max: 92.9
Percentiles: PMio max:
25th: 58.57
50th: 74.55
75th: 107.56
PMio avg:
25th: 42.19
50th: 64.17
75th: 81.75
Range (Min, Max):
PMio avg: 25.0, 338.7
PMio max: 25.0, 338.7
Monitoring Stations: at least one in
each of the 5 camps
PM max Quartiles (combining all camps):
Q1: < 58.7 //g/m3
Q2: 60.1 to < 75.54//g/m3
Q3: 78.56 to < 107.56 //g/m3
04: >107.56//g/m3
For dichotomous analysis
cutoff - 74.55 //g/m3
PM avg Quartiles (combining all camps):
Q1: < 42.19 //g/m3
Q2: 42.19 to 64.17 //g/m3
Q3: 64.17to81.75/yg|m3
04: > 81.75 //g/m3
For dichotomous analysis
cutoff - 64.17 //g/m
Pearson correlation coefficients between
URD rate and PM category [p-value]:
PMio max: quartiles of PM*URD rates
All camps 0.203 [0.041]
Blue Factory camp 0.277 [0.095]
Comanche 0.165 [0.237]
Demi 0.639 [0.123]
McGovern 0.535 [0.177]
Tuzla Main 0.107 [0.327]
PMio max: dichotomous PM*URD rates:
All camps 0.283 [0.007]
Blue Factory camp 0.038 [0.430]
Comanche 0.282 [0.107]
Demi 0.927 [0.012]
McGovern 0.853 [0.033]
Tuzla Main 0.155 [0.258]
PMio avg: quartiles of PM*URD rates: All
camps 0.149 [0.101]
Blue Factory camp 0.301 [0.077]
Comanche 0.246 [0.141]
Demi 0.437 [0.231]
McGovern 0.853 [0.033]
Tuzla Main 0.182 [0.222]
July 2009
E-164
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
PMio avg: dichotomous PM*URD rates:
All camps 0.060 [0.305]
Blue Factory camp -0.075 [0.365]
Comanche 0.143 [0.268]
Demi N/A*
McGovern N/A*
Tuzla Main 0.123 [0.303]
Kruskal Wallace p-value comparing URD
rates across exposure quartiles: PMio
max
All camps 0.047
Blue Factory camp 0.321
Comanche 0.556
Demi 0.165
McGovern 0.202
Tuzla Main 0.554
PMio avg
All camps 0.672
Blue Factory camp 0.809
Comanche 0.658
Demi 0.564
McGovern 0.157
Tuzla Main 0.891
Mann-Whitney p-value comparing URD
rates between upper and lower 50th
percentile of PM: PMio max
All camps 0.034
Blue Factory camp 0.173
Comanche 0.314
Demi 0.083
McGovern 0.401
Tuzla Main 0.481
PMio avg
All camps 0.824
Blue Factory camp 0.682
Comanche 0.508
Demi N/A*
McGovern N/A*
Tuzla Main 0.656
Notes: * there were no days that fell in
the upper 50%ile for PM avg in these
camps
¦Rates of URD by PM quartiles for each
camp presented in figures. Authors state,
"Generally the avg URD rate increased
with quartile of maximum exposure...the
trend was not as clear for quartiles of
PMio avg exposure"
Reference: Hong et al. (2007, 091347) Outcome: Peak expiratory flow rate
(PEFR)
Period of Study: March 23-May 3, 2004
J\t|eJ3n>u|jsjj3rcno_^^
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Effect Estimate: Regression coefficients
of morning and daily mean PEFR on PMio
and metal components using linear mixed-
July 2009
E-165
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Location: School on the Dukjeok Island
near Incheon City, Korea
Design & Methods
age - 9.6 yrs)
Study Design: panel study
N: 43 schoolchildren
Statistical Analyses: Mixed linear
regression
Covariates: age, sex, height, weight,
asthma history, and passive smoking
exposure at home
Dose-response Investigated? No
Lags Considered: 0,1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Concentrations'
Mean (SD): 35.30 (23.48)
50th (Median): 29.36
Range (Min, Max):
(12.24-124.87)
PM Component:
Fe: mean - 0.208 (0.203)//g/m3
Median - 0.112
Range (Min, Max): (0.061-0.806)
Mn: mean - 0.008 (0.005) //g/m3
Median - 0.007
Range (Min, Max): (0.000-0.019)
Pb: mean - 0.051 (0.031) //g/m3
Median - 0.051
Range (Min, Max): (0.011-0.155)
Zn: mean - 0.021 (0.021) //g/m3
Median - 0.013
Range (Min, Max): (0.006-0.112)
Al: mean - 0.085 (0.100)//g/m3
Median - 0.031
Range (Min, Max): (0.017-0.344)
Copollutant: PM2.6
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
effects regression
Lag 1 (PMio)
Morning PEFR
Crude: B - -0.00, p - 0.99
Adjusted: B - -0.04, p - 0.37
Mean PEFR
Crude: B - 0.00, p - 0.93
Adjusted: B - -0.05, p - 0.12
Lag 1 (logFe)
Morning PEFR
Crude: B - -1.26, p - 0.31
Adjusted: B - -3.24, p - 0.13
Mean PEFR
Crude: B - -1.20, p - 0.20
Adjusted: B - -2.37, p - 0.15
Lag 1 (logMn)
Morning PEFR
Crude: B - -4.40, p < 0.01
Adjusted: B - -9.82, p < 0.01
Mean PEFR
Crude: B - -4.05, p < 0.01
Adjusted: B - -8.44, p < 0.01
Lag 1 (logPb)
Morning PEFR
Crude: B - -6.79, p < 0.01
Adjusted: B - -6.83, p < 0.01
Mean PEFR
Crude: B - -6.23, p < 0.01
Adjusted: B - -6.37, p < 0.01
Lag 1 (logZn)
Morning PEFR
Crude: B - -0.55, p - 0.71
Adjusted: B - -0.98, p - 0.59
Mean PEFR
Crude: B - 1.33, p - 0.24
Adjusted: B - 1.53, p - 0.28
Lag1 (logAI)
Morning PEFR
Crude: B - -0.58, p - 0.57
Adjusted: B - -2.22, p - 0.25
Mean PEFR
Crude: B - -0.59, p - 0.45
Adjusted: B - -1.48, p - 0.32
Regression coefficients of morning and
daily mean PEFR on metal components of
PMio and GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotype
July 2009 E-166 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
using linear mixed-effects regression
Lag 1 (logPb)
Morning PEFR: B - -7.26, p < 0.01
Mean PEFR: B - -6.43, p< 0.01
GSTM1
Morning PEFR: B - 21.19, p - 0.23
Mean PEFR: B - 20.09, p - 0.25
Lag 1 (logMn)
Morning PEFR: B - -10.31, p < 0.01
Mean PEFR: B--8.66, p< 0.01
GSTM1
Morning PEFR: B - 21.02, p - 0.23
Mean PEFR: B - 19.84, p - 0.25
Lag 1 (logPb)
Morning PEFR: B - -7.26, p < 0.01
Mean PEFR: B--6.43, p< 0.01
GSTT1
Morning PEFR: B - 2.07, p - 0.90
Mean PEFR: B--2.39, p< 0.88
Lag 1 (logMn]
Morning PEFR: B - -10.32, p < 0.01
Mean PEFR: B--8.67, p< 0.01
GSTT1
Morning PEFR: B - 2.02, p - 0.90
Mean PEFR: B - 2.33, p - 0.88
July 2009
E-167
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Hwang et al. (2006, 088971) Outcome: Allergic rhinitis
Period of Study: 2001 Study Design: Cross-sectional
Location: Taiwan Statistical Analyses: Two-stage
hierarchical models
Age Groups: 6-15
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 1-h avg
Mean (SD): 55.58 (16.57)
Range (Min, Max):
(29.36, 99.58)
Copollutants (correlation):
CO: r - 0.27
NOx: r - 0.34
0s: r - 0.28
SO?: r - 0.58
Increment: 10/yg/m3
Odds Ratio (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
PM10 alone: 1.00(0.99,1.02)
NOx, PM10: 0.99 (0.97,1.00)
CO, PM10:1.00 (0.99,1.01)
03, PM10:1.00 (0.99,1.02)
Gender
Male: 1.02(0.99,1.04)
Female: 0.99(0.97,1.02)
Parental atopy*
Yes: 1.00 (0.98,1.03)
No: 1.01 (0.99,1.03)
Parental education
< 6 years: 1.05 (0.96,1.14)
6-8 years: 1.03(0.98,1.07)
9-11 years: 1.00(0.98,1.03)
12+years: 0.99(0.97,1.02)
Environmental tobacco smoke
Yes: 1.01 (0.99,1.03)
No: 1.00 (0.98,1.03)
Visible mold**
Yes: 1.02 (0.99,1.06)
No: 1.00 (0.98,1.02)
* Parental atopy was a measure of
genetic predisposition and was defined as
the father or the mother of the index child
ever having been diagnosed as having
asthma, allergic rhinitis, or atopic
eczema.
** Visible mold found in the home.
Reference: Jalaludin et al. (2004,
Outcome: Respiratory symptoms,
Pollutant: PM10
Increment: 10/yg/m3
056595)
Wheeze, Dry cough, Wet cough
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Odds Ratio (Lower CI, Upper CI)
Period of Study: 2/1/1994-12/31/1994
Study Design: Longitudinal study pani
;l
Mean (SD): 22.8(13.8)
Lag
Location: Western and southwestern
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
Sydney, Australia
regression model (GEE)
IQ Range (25th,75th): (12.00,122.8)
Wheeze
Age Groups: 9-11
Copollutants (correlation): O3: r — 0.13
1.01 (0.99,1
1.03)
NO?: r - 0.26
0
1.01 (0.97,1
1
1.04)
1
0.99(0.96,1
9
1.03)
1.02(0.98,1
1.06)
0-2 avg
1.04 (0.99,1
1.10)
0-5 avg
Dry Cough
1.00(0.98,1
1.03)
July 2009
E-168
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
0
1.00(0.97,1.03)
1
1.00(0.97,1.02)
2
1.00(0.97,1.03)
0-2 avg
1.03(0.98,1.08)
0-5 avg
Wet Cough
1.01 (0.99,1.04)
0
0.99(0.97,1.01)
1
1.00(0.97,1.03)
2
0.99(0.96,1.02)
0-2 avg
0.99(0.94,1.04)
0-5 avg
Inhaled B2-agonist Use
0.99(0.98,1.01)
0
1.00(0.98,1.03)
1
0.99(0.97,1.01)
2
1.00(0.97,1.02)
0-2 avg
1.02(0.98,1.06)
0-5 avg
Inhaled Corticosteroid Use
1.00(0.99,1.01)
0
1.00(0.99,1.02)
1
1.00(0.99,1.02)
2
1.00(0.98,1.02)
0-2 avg
1.00(0.97,1.02)
0-5 avg
Doctor Visit for Asthma
1.11 (1.04,1.19)
0
July 2009
E-169
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
1.10(1.02,1.19)
1
1.15(1.06,1.24)
2
1.11 (1.03,1.20)
0-2 avg
1.14(0.98,1.31)
0-5 avg
OR for respiratory symptoms and
PMio exposure by different groups
All children
Wheeze: 1.01 (0.99,1.04)
Dry Cough: 1.00 (0.97,1.02)
Wet Cough: 1.01 (0.98,1.04)
Inhaled B2 agonist Use: 1.00 (0.98,1.02)
Inhaled Corticosteroid Use: 0.99 (0.98,
1.01)
Doctor Visit for asthma: 1.11 (1.03,
1.19)
Group 1*
Wheeze: 1.01 (0.98,1.04)
Dry Cough: 0.97 (0.94, 0.99)
Wet Cough: 1.00 (0.97,1.03)
Inhaled B2-agonist use: 1.00 (0.98,1.02)
Inhaled Corticosteroid Use: 1.00 (0.98,
1.01)
Doctor Visit for asthma: 1.09 (0.98,
1.21)
Group 2**
Wheeze: 1.01 (0.97,1.05)
Dry Cough: 1.02 (0.98,1.06)
Wet Cough: 1.01 (0.96,1.06)
Inhaled B2 agonist use: 0.99 (0.94,1.05)
Inhaled Corticosteroid Use: 0.99 (0.97,
1.01)
Doctor Visit for asthma: 1.12 (1.02,
1.23)
Group 3***
Wheeze: 1.08 (0.90,1.31)
Dry Cough: 1.01 (0.91,1.11)
Wet Cough: 1.02 (0.94,1.11)
Inhaled B2-agonist use: 0.98 (0.84,1.11)
Inhaled Corticosteroid Use: 1.27 (1.08,
1.49)
Doctor Visit for asthma: NR
Group 1 consists of children with a
history of wheeze in the past 12 months,
positive histamine challenge, and doctor
diagnosed asthma.
J^Gjjou£_2_cons^sts_o^childrenj/vjth_a__
July 2009
E-170
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
history of wheeze in the past 12 months
and doctor diagnosed asthma.
""Group 3 consists of children only
with a history y of wheeze in the past 12
months.
Reference: Jansen, et al. (2005,
082236)
Period of Study: 1987-2000
Location: Seattle, WA
Outcome: FEN0: fractional exhaled
nitrogen oxide, Spirometry, Blood
pressure, Sa02: oxygen saturation, Pulse
rate
Age Groups: 60-86-years-old
Study Design: short-term cross-sectional
case series
N: 16 subjects diagnosed with C0PD,
asthma, or both
Statistical Analyses: linear mixed
effects model with random intercepts
Covariates: age, relative humidity,
temperature, medication use
Season: winter 2002-2003
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: STATA
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h
Mean (SD): Fixed-site Monitor: 18.0
All Subjects (N - 16)
Indoor, home: 11.93
Outdoor, home: 13.47
Personal: 23.34
Asthmatic Subjects (N - 7)
Indoor, home: 12.54
Outdoor, home: 11.86
Personal: 26.88
C0PD Subjects (N - 9)
Indoor, home: 11.45
Outdoor, home: 14.76
Personal: 19.91
Range (Min, Max): Fixed-site Monitor
2.5, 51
IQR: All Subjects
Indoor, home: 6.93
Outdoor, home: 9.53
Personal: 20.72
Asthmatic Subjects
Indoor, home: 10.19
Outdoor, home: 8.77
Personal: 20.08
C0PD Subjects
Indoor, home: 4.56
Outdoor, home: 6.14
Personal: 19.94
PM Increment: 10 (xglm3
Slope [95% CI]: dependence of FEN0
concentration [ppb] on PMio
Asthmatic Subjects
Indoor, home: 3.81 [-0.86: 8.50]
Outdoor, home: 5.87 [2.87: 8.88]*
Personal: 0.66 [-0.56: 1.88]
C0PD Subjects
Indoor, home: 2.19 [-3.48: 7.87]
Outdoor, home: 4.45 [-1.11:10.01]
Personal: 0.17 [-1.61: 1.96]
Results indicate that FENO may be a
more sensitive biomarker of PM exposure
than other traditional health endpoints.
Reference: Johnston, et al. (2006,
091386)
Period of Study: 7 months. (April 7
through November 7, 2004)
Location: Darwin, Australia
Outcome: Asthma symptoms
Age Groups: all ages
Study Design: Time-series
N: 251 people (130 adults, 121 children
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression model
Covariates: minimum air temperature,
doctor visits for influenza and the
prevalence of asthma symptoms and, the
fungal spore count and both onset of
asthma symptoms and commencement of
reliever medication
Season: "dry season"-specific months
NR, note Southern Hemisphere
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: STATA8
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: daily
Mean (SD): 20 (6.4)
Range (Min, Max): 2.6-43.3
PM Component: Vegetation fire smoke
(95%) and motor vehicle emissions (5%)
Monitoring Stations: 1
Correlation: PM 2.6 r - 0.90
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
Symptoms attributable to asthma
Overall-1.010 (0.98,1.04)
Adults-1.027 (0.987,1.068)
Children-0.930 (0.966,1.060)
Using preventer- 1.022 (0.985,1.060)
Became symptomatic
Overall- 1.240(1.106,1.39)
Adults-1.277 (1.084,1.504)
Children- 1.247 (1.058,1.468)
Using preventer—1.317 (1.124,1.543)
Used Reliever
July 2009
E-171
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Lags Considered: 0-5 days
Overall-1.010 (0.99,1.04)
Adults-1.026(0.990,1.063)
Children- 1.006 (0.960,1.055)
Using preventer—1.035 (1.004,1.060)
Commenced Reliever
Overall- 1.132(0.99,1.29)
Adults-1.199(0.994,1.446)
Children- 1.093 (0.906,1.319)
Using preventer—1.194 (0.996,1.432)
Commenced Oral Steroids
Overall- 1.540(1.01,2.34)
Adults-1.752 (1.008, 3.045)
Children- 1.292 (0.682, 2.448)
Using preventer—1.430 (0.888, 2.304)
Asthma Attack
Overall- 1.030(0.95,1.12)
Adults-1.08 (0.976,1.202)
Children- 0.861 (0.710,1.044)
Using preventer—1.051 (0.939,1.175)
Exercise induced asthma
Overall- 0.980(0.92,1.05)
Adults-0.988 (0.902,1.081)
Children- 0.972(0.844,1.119)
Using preventer—1.026 (0.928,1.134)
Saw a health professional for asthma
Overall- 1.030(0.85,1.26)
Adults-1.064 (0.794,1.424)
Children- 0.998 (0.749,1.328)
Using preventer-0.924 (0.731,1.169)
Missed school or work due to asthma
Overall- 1.102(0.941,1.290)
Adults-1.135(0.897,1.435)
Children- 1.073(0.862,1.333)
Using preventer—1.025 (0.857,1.228)
Mean daily number of asthma symptoms
Overall- 1.020(1.001,1.031)
Adults-1.027 (1.005,1.049)
Children- 1.016(0.986,1.047)
Using preventer—1.034 (1.011,1.058)
Mean Daily number of applications of
reliever
Overall- 1.020(1.00,1.030)
Adults-1.032(1.008,1.057)
Children- 1.002 (0.969,1.034)
Using preventer—1.022 (1.001,1.043)
July 2009
E-172
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Just et al. (2002, 035429)
Period of Study: 4/1/1996-6/30/1996
Location: Paris, France
Outcome: Incident and prevalent
episodes of asthma attacks, nocturnal
cough, wheeze, symptoms of irritation,
respiratory infections, supplementary use
of (32-agonists, Ztransformed peak
expiratory flow (PEF), daily PEF variability
Age Groups: 7-15 years old
Study Design: Cohort
N: 82 children
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression,
logistic regression, GEE
Covariates: Effects of time trend, day of
the week, weather, pollen levels
Season: Spring/summer
Lags Considered: 0, 0-2 mean, 0-4 mean
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: Daily
Mean (SD): 23.5 (8.4)
Range (Min, Max): 9.0, 44.0
Monitoring Stations: 5
Copollutant (correlation):
BS: 0.59
SO?: 0.70
NO?: 0.54
O3: 0.21
temp: 0.04
humid: -0.41
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3 for binary
responses data (results that use odds
ratios [ORs])
Incident episodes of
1) Asthma
a) lag 0:1.06 (0.61,1.83)
b) 0-2 mean: 1.09 (0.48, 2.49)
c) 0-4 mean: 1.07 (0.44, 2.65)
2) Nocturnal cough
a) lag 0:1.10 (0.88,1.37)
b) 0-2 mean: 1.03 (0.77,1.37)
c) 0-4 mean: 1.11 (0.86,1.42)
3) Respiratory infections
a) lag 0:0.64 (0.35,1.15)
b) 0-2 mean: 0.74 (0.38,1.43)
c) 0-4 mean: 0.99 (0.58,1.68)
Prevalent episodes of
1) Asthma
a) lag 0:1.07 (0.72,1.59)
b) 0-2 mean: 1.18(0.64, 2.17)
c) 0-4 mean: 1.16(0.63, 2.13)
2) Nocturnal cough
a) lag 0:1.05 (0.83,1.34)
b) 0-2 mean: 1.10 (0.81,1.50)
c) 0-4 mean: 1.09(0.79,1.52)
3) Respiratory infections
a) lag 0:1.17 (0.68, 2.03)
b) 0-2 mean: 1.31 (0.51,3.36)
c) 0-4 mean: 1.71 (0.71,4.12)
4) Eye irritation
a) lag 0:1.18 (1.01,1.39)
b) 0-2 mean: 1.28 (1.03,1.59)
c) 0-4 mean: 1.42(1.12,1.80)
Analysis restricted to days with no
steroid use
Incident episodes of
1) Eye irritation
a) lag 0:1.07 (0.66,1.71)
b) 0-2 mean: 0.83 (0.45,1.53)
c) 0-4 mean: 0.92(0.46,1.83)
2) Throat irritation
a) lag 0:1.33 (0.66, 2.69)
b) 0-2 mean: 1.28 (0.58, 2.80)
c) 0-4 mean: 1.06 (0.38, 2.95)
3) Nose irritation
a) lag 0:0.74 (0.48,1.13)
July 2009
E-173
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
b) 0-2 mean: 0.76(0.42,1.36)
c) 0-4 mean: 0.96 (0.53,1.73)
Prevalent episodes of
1) Eye irritation
a) lag 0:1.20 (0.88,1.65)
b) 0-2 mean: 1.71 (0.97,3.01)
c) 0-4 mean: 1.97(1.03, 3.76)
2) Throat irritation
a) lag 0:1.23 (0.83,1.82)
b) 0-2 mean: 1.08 (0.68,1.73)
c) 0-4 mean: 0.91 (0.47,1.73)
3) Nose irritation
a) lag 0:1.20 (0.91,1.58)
b) 0-2 mean: 1.09 (0.78,1.52)
c) 0-4 mean: 1.09(0.73,1.61)
Notes: The authors noted that incident or
prevalent wheeze was not correlated
with levels of any type of pollutant
also, they state no relationship was
observed between PEF variables and
levels of PM.
The authors also note that in a
multipollutant model assessing
independent effects of PM and 03 on
prevalent episodes of eye irritation (mean
0-4), the PM parameter decreased and
was not significant (p - 0.19).
PM Increment: 1.0 /yglm3
% Change [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Single pollutant model:
FEVi: -4.3 [-8.5, 0.2] p - 0.04
R2 - 0.06
Single pollutant model:
FVC:-1.2 [-5.6,3.2] p - 0.59
R2 - 0.005
Single pollutant model:
FEF2B-7B:-8.6 [-17.3, 0.1] p - 0.05
R2 - 0.06
2 pollutant model with Macrophage
Carbon:
FEVi: PM10 -2.9 [-6.9,1.2]
p - 0.17
(FVC): PM10 0.1 [-4.4, 4.6]
p - 0.96
FEF2b-7b: PM10 -5.5 [-14.2, 3.1]
p - 0.21
Reference: Kulkarni et al (2006,
089257)
Period of Study: 11/2002-12/2003
Location: Leicester, United Kingdom
Outcome: Lung function by spirometry:
FVC, FEVi, FEVi: FVC, FEF25-75
Age Groups: 8-15
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 114 children, 64 provided sputum for
assessment of carbon content of
macrophages.
Statistical Analyses: Linear
regressions, Spearman rank correlations.
Mann-Whitney, Chi-square and unpaired t
tests were used to compare results
between asthmatic and non asthmatic
children
Covariates: BMI, sex, exercise, traffic
PM10
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: SPSS
Pollutant: Primary PM10 (/yglm3)
concentration was modeled, and was
considered a covariate for carbon content
of macrophages. Carbon content of
alveolar macrophages was the primary
variable of interest.
Averaging Time: 1 Yr
50th(Median): Children without asthma,
1.21
Children with asthma, 1.81
Range (Min, Max): Children without
asthma, 0.10, 2.17
Children with asthma, 0.17, 2.13
PM Component: Carbon content in
alveolar macrophages
Monitoring Stations: NR.
Copollutant (correlation): vs carbon
content in macrophages (increment,
coefficient [range])—1.0/yglm3, 0.1 [0.01 ¦
0.18]
July 2009
E-174
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Kuo, et al. (2002, 036310)
Period of Study: 1 -yr period (year not
specified)
Location: Central Taiwan
Outcome: Asthma (yes/no)
Age Groups: 13-16 years
Study Design: Cohort
N: 12926 total children
775 asthmatic children
8 junior high schools
Statistical Analyses: Pearson
correlation coefficients
Logistic regression
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 1-h
Mean (SD):
School A: 59.7
School B: 65.3
School C: 84.3
School D: 59.2
School E: 75.3
School F: 60.2
Covariates: Gender, age, residential
area, level of parental education, number School G: 54.1
cigarettes smoked by family members,
incense burning in the home, frequency of
physical activities
School H: 69.0
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS 6.12
Lags Considered: Monthly averages at
each school
Monitoring Stations: 8 (1 for each
school)
PM Increment: Dichotomized annual
avg:
< 65.9 /yg/m3
a 65.9/yg/m3
OR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Crude (outcome - asthma, yes/no)
< 65.9 /yg/m3: 1 (ref)
a 65.9/yg/m3: 0.837 [NR]
Adjusted (outcome - asthma, yes/no)
< 65.9 /yg/m3: 1 (ref)
a 65.9/yg/m3: 0.947 [0.640,1.401]
Notes: asthma prevalence was highest in
urban areas and lowest in rural areas
Pearson correlation between annual PM
levels at each school and asthma
prevalence at each school: 0.214
[p > 0.05]
Reference: Lagorio et al. (2006,
089800)
Period of Study: 5/24/1999 to
6/24/1999 and 11/181999 to
12/22/1999
Location: Rome, Italy
Outcome: Lung function of subjects (FVC
and FEVi) with COPD, Asthma
Age Groups: COPD 50 to 80 yrs
Asthma 18 to 64 yrs
Study Design: Time series panel
N: COPD N - 11
Asthma N - 11
Statistical Analyses: Non-parametric
Spearman correlation
GEE
Covariates: COPD and IHD: daily mean
temperature, season variable (spring or
winter), relative humidity, day of week
Asthma: season variable, temperature,
humidity, and (3-2-agonist use
Season: Spring and winter
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: STATA
Lags Considered: 1-3 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h
Mean (SD):
Overall: 42.8 (21.8)
Spring: 36.9 (10.8)
Winter: 49.0(28.1)
Range (Min, Max): (7.9,123)
PM Component: NR
Monitoring Stations: Two fixed sites:
(Villa Ada and Istituto superior di Sanita)
Copollutant (correlation): NO2 r - 0.45
O3 r = -0.36
COr - 0.55
SO? r - 0.21
PMio-2.5 r - 0.61
PM2.6 r - 0.93
PM Increment: 1 /yg/m3
They observed negative association
between ambient PMio and respiratory
function (FVC and FEVi) in the COPD
panel. The effect on FVC was seen at lag
24 h, 48 h, and 72 h. The effect on FEVi
was evident at lag 72 h. There was no
statistically significant effect of PMio on
FVC and FEVi in the asthmatic and IHD
(3 Coefficient (SE)
COPD
FVC(%) 24 h-0.66 (0.30)
48-h-0.75 (0.35)
72-h -0.94 (0.47)
FEVi(%) 24 h -0.37 (0.27)
48-h-0.58 (0.31)
72-h -0.87 (0.43)
Asthma
FVC(%) 24 h-0.12 (0.24)
48-h -0.09 (0.29)
72-h -0.08 (0.36)
FEVi(%) 24 h-0.28 (0.28)
48-h -0.40 (0.34)
72-h -0.40 (0.43)
July 2009
E-175
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Lee, et al. (2007, 093042)
Period of Study: 2000-2001
Location: South-Western Seoul
Metropolitan area, Seoul, South Korea
Reference: Lewis, et al (2005, 081079)
Period of Study: winter 2001 -spring
2002
Location: Detroit, Michigan, USA
Outcome: PEFR (peak expiratory flow
rate), lower respiratory symptoms (cold,
cough, wheeze)
Age Groups: 61-89 years of age (77.8
mean age)
Study Design: longitudinal panel survey
N: 61 adults
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression model
Covariates: Temperature (Celsius),
relative humidity, age, season
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS 8.0
Lags Considered: 0-4 days
Outcome: Poorer lung function (increased
diurnal variability and decreased forced
expiratory volume)
Age Groups: 7-11 years old
N: 86 children
Statistical Analyses: descriptive
statistics and bivariate analyses of
exposures, multivariable regression
models that included interaction terms
between exposure measures and CS use
or, alternatively, presence of a URI,
multivariate analog of linear regression.
Covariates: sex, home location, annual
family income, presence of one or more
smokers in household, race, season
(entered as dummy variables), and
parameters to account for intervention
group effect.
Season: Winter 2001 (February 10-23),
spring 2001 (May 5-18), summer 2001
(July 14-27), fall 2001 (September 22-
October 5), winter 2002 (January 18-
31), and spring 2002 (May 18-31).
Dose-response Investigated? No
Lags Considered: 1-2 days
3-5 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h
Mean (SD): 71.40 (30.69)
Percentiles: 25th: 43.47
50th(Median): 74.92
75th: 87.54
Range (Min, Max):
26.23,148.34
Monitoring Stations: 2
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 2 weeks
Mean (SD): Eastside 23.0 (13.5)
Range (Min, Max): 2.9, 70.9
PM Component: ("likely" in southwest
site) carbon and diesel emissions
Monitoring Stations: 2
Copollutant:
PM2.6 0.93
O3 Daily mean 0.59
O3 8-h peak 0.57
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
PEFR (peak expiratory flow rate)
¦0.39 (-0.63 to-0.14)
1 day
relative odds of a lower respiratory
symptom (cold, cough, wheeze)
1.015(0.900,1.144)
1 day
PM Increment: 19.1 /yglm3
Lung function among children
reporting use of maintenance CSs
Diurnal variability FEVi
Lag 1:1.53 [-0.85, 3.90]
Lag 1:2.94 [-1.07, 6.96] PMio + 0s
Lag 2: 5.32 [0.32,10.33]
Lag 2:13.73(8.23,19.23] PMio + 0s
Lag 3-5: 1.46 [-2.21,5.13]
Lag 3-5: 3.30 [0.58,6.02] PMio + 0s
Lowest daily value FEVi
Lag 1: -0.28 [-2.34,1.77]
Lag 1: -6.25 [-11.15 to-1.36] PMio + 0s
Lag 2:-2.21 [-3.97 to -0.46]
Lag 2: -5.97 [-11.06 to -0.87] PMio + 0s
Lag 3-5: -2.58 [-7.65, 2.49]
Lag 3-5: 1.98[-0.38, 4.33] PMio + 0s
Lung function among children
reporting presence of URI on day of
lung function assessment
Diurnal variability FEVi
Lag 1: 3.51 [-4.52,11.55]
Lag 1: 3.21 [-1.28,7.71] PMio + 0s
Lag 2: 1.12 [-4.62, 6.86]
Lag 2: 5.40 [-0.82,11.62] PMio + 0s
Lag 3-5: 3.90 [0.34, 7.47]
Lag 3-5: 6.27 [0.07,12.47] PMio + 0s
Lowest daily value FEVi
Lag 1: -2.72 [-9.47, 4.03]
Lag 1: -13.11 [-21.59 to-4.62] PMio +
0s
Lag 2: 0.24 [-5.10, 4.63]
Lag 2: -3.32 [-6.83, 0.18] PMio + 0s
Lag 3-5: -4.48 [-8.36, 0.60]
Lag 3-5: -3.17 [-5.82 to-0.51] PM10 + 0s
Study Design: longitudinal cohort study Southwest 28.2 (16.1)
July 2009
E-176
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Maret al. (2004, 057309)
Period of Study: 1997-1999
Location: Spokane, Washington
Outcome: Respiratory symptoms
Age Groups: Adults: Ages 20-51 yrs
Children: Ages 7-12 yrs
Study Design: Time-series
N: 25 people
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression
Covariates: Temperature, relative
humidity, day of-the-wk
Statistical Package: STATA 6
Lags Considered: 0-2 days
Pollutant: PMio
Mean (SD):
1997: 24.5(18.5)
1998: 20.6(12.3)
1999: 16.8(8.0)
Monitoring Stations:
1 station
Copollutant (correlation): PMio
PMi
r - 0.48
PM2.6
r - 0.61
PMio-2.5
r - 0.93
July 2009
E-177
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3
OR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Adult Respiratory symptoms: Wheeze:
1.01(0.93,1.09]
lag 0
0.98(0.91,1.06]
lag 1
0.99(0.92,1.06]
lag 2
Breath: 1.02(0.96,1.08]
lag 0
1.01(0.97,1.06]
lag 1
1.02(0.97,1.06]
lag 2
Cough: 0.96(0.88,1.05]
lag 0
0.97(0.90,1.04]
lag 1
0.98(0.92,1.05]
lag 2
Sputum: 1.01(0.92,1.12]
lag 0
0.99(0.91,1.08]
lag 1
1.00(0.93,1.08]
lag 2
Runny Nose: 0.98(0.93,1.04]
lag 0
0.97(0.93,1.02]
lag 1:0.97(0.94,1.01]
lag 2
Eye Irritation: 0.97(0.87,1.08]
lag 0
0.97(0.88,1.06]
lag 1
0.97(0.91,1.04]
lag 2
Lower Symptoms: 0.96(0.91,1.02]
lag 0
0.95(0.89,1.00]
lag 1
0.95(0.90,1.00]
lag 2
Any Symptoms: 0.97(0.93,1.02]
lag 0
0.96(0.91,1.00]
^RAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
0.95(0.91,0.99]
lag 2
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Mar et al. (2005, 087566)
Period of Study: 1999-2001
Location: Seattle, Washington
Study Design: Time series
Outcome: Pulmonary function (arterial
oxygen saturation) and cardiac function
(heart rate and blood pressure)
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
Lag
N: 88
Indoor
Statistical Analyses: Linear logistic
regression
Age Groups: >57
Systolic: 0.92 (-0.95, 2.78)
0
Diastolic: 0.63 (-0.29,1.56)
0
Outdoor
Systolic:-0.10 (-1.37,1.18)
0
Diastolic: -0.03 (-0.79, 0.73)
0
Nephelometer
Systolic: 0.35 (-0.91,1.61)
0
Diastolic: -0.12 (-0.91, 0.67)
0
% Increase between heart rate and
PMio exposure for people >57
PMio
Indoor: 0.02 (-0.54, 0.58)
0
Outdoor: -0.48 (-1.03, 0.06)
0
Nephelometer: -0.31 (-0.76, 0.14)
0
July 2009
E-178
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: McCormack et al, 2009
Outcome: Asthma symptoms
Pollutant: PM10 2 B, PM2.6
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Period of Study: September 2001- April
Study Design: Panel
Averaging Time: 3d
Relative Risk (Min CI, Max CI)
2004
Statistical Analysis: Chi-square,
Mean (SD) Unit:
Lag
Location: East Baltimore, Maryland
Student t-test. Negative binomial
regression models with GEE, Logistic
PM102.B: 17.4 ± 21.2/yg|m3
Bivariate Models, PM10-2.B
regression with GEE
PM2.6: 40.3 ± 35.4/yg/m3
Cough, wheezing, chest tightness: 1.05
Statistical Package: StataSE
Range (Min, Max): NR
(0.99-1.10), p - 0.08
Age Groups: Asthmatic children aged 2-
R
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Slow down: 1.08 (1.03-1.13). p < 0.01
0
Symptoms with running: 1.03 (0.97-
1.09). p - 0.39
Nocturnal symptoms: 1.06 (1.01-1.11), p
- 0.03
Limited speech: 1.11 (1.05-1.18), p <
0.01
Rescue medication use: 1.06 (1.02-1.11),
p < 0.01
Bivariate Models, PM2.6
Cough, wheezing, chest tightness: 1.01
(0.98-1.05), p - 0.41
Slow down: 1.00 (0.97-1.04), p - 0.85
Symptoms with running: 1.04 (1.01-
1.07), p - 0.14
Nocturnal symptoms: 1.02 (0.98-1.05), p
- 0.37
Limited speech: 1.01 (0.95-1.07), p -
0.33
Rescue medication use: 1.03 (1.00-1.60),
p - 0.06
Multivariate Models, PM10-2.E
Cough, wheezing, chest tightness: 1.06
(1.01-1.12), p - 0.02
Slow down: 1.08 (1.02-1.14), p - 0.01
Symptoms with running: 1.00 (0.94-
1.08), p - 0.81
Nocturnal symptoms: 1.08 (1.01-1.14), p
- 0.02
Limited speech: 1.11 (1.03-1.19), p <
0.01
Rescue medication use: 1.06 (1.01-1.10),
p - 0.02
Multivariate Models, PM2.6
Cough, wheezing, chest tightness: 1.03
(0.99-1.07), p - 0.18
Slow down: 1.04 (1.00-1.09), p - 0.06
Symptoms with running: 1.07 (1.02-
1.11), p < 0.01
Nocturnal symptoms: 1.06 (1.01-1.10), p
- 0.01
Limited speech: 1.07 (1.00-1.14), p -
0.04
Rescue medication use: 1.04 (1.01-1.08),
p - 0.04
July 2009
E-179
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Mortimer et al. (2008,
187280)
Period of Study: 1989-2000
Location: Joaquin Valley, California
Outcome: Respiratory Symptoms,
Decreased lung function
Study Design: Time series
Statistical Analyses:
Deletion/Substitution/ Addition algorithm "0: r " " 05
(GEE)
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Copollutants (correlation):
Logistic linear regression
Age Groups: 6-11
NO?: r - 0.30
O3: r = 0.39
Increment: NR
P (SE):
FVC: PM10 (age 0-3 yrs): 0.0121
(0.0037)
FEVi: PM10 (age 0-3 yrs): 0.0102
(0.0034)
PEF: PM10 (Mother smoked during
pregnancy):
¦0.0102(0.0039)
Reference: Mortimer et al. (2002,
Outcome: peak expiratory flow rate
Pollutant: PM10
PM Increment: 20/yg/m3
030281)
(PEFR) and symptoms
Averaging Time: 24 h
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Period of Study: June-August 1993
Age Groups: 4-9 yrs
Mean (SD): 53
(RR estimates are odds ratios for
Location: Eight urban areas of the US:
Study Design: Cohort study
Monitoring Stations: NR
incidence of morning asthma symptoms
Bronx and East Harlem, NY
using the avg of lag 1-2)
N: 846 children with a history of asthma
Baltimore, MD
Copollutant (correlation): 8-h avg
3 urban areas (DE, CL, CH)
Statistical Analyses: Mixed linear
ozone: r - 0.51
Washington, DC
models and GEE
Single pollutant: OR - 1.26 (1.00-1.59)
Detroit, Ml
Covariates: day of study, previous 12-h
Ozone+PM10: OR - 1.25(0.97-1.61)
mean temperature, urban area, diary
Cleveland, OH
number, rain in the past 24 h
Ozone+S02 +NO2+PM10: OR - 1.14
Chicago, IL
(0.80-1.48)
Season: Summer
and St. Louis, M0.
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 0,1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,1-5
avg, 1-4 avg, 0-4 avg, 0-3 avg
Reference: Moshammer and
(2003, 041956)
Period of Study: 2000-2001
Location: Linz, Austria
Outcome: Lung Function: FVC, FEVi,
MEF26, MEFbo, MEFjb, PEF, LQ Signal,
PAS Signal
Age Groups: Ages 7 to 10
Study Design: Case-crossover
N: 161 children
1898-2120 "half-h means"
Statistical Analyses: Correlations
Regression Analysis
Covariates: Morning, Evening, Night
Season: Spring, summer, Winter, Fall
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 8 h
Daily Means
Mean (SD): 23.13(20.08)
Range (Min, Max): (NR, 190.79)
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation): LQ - 0.751
PAS - 0.406
Notes: "Acute effects of 'active particle
surface' as measured by diffusion
charging were found on pulmonary
function (FVC, FEVi, MEF50) of
elementary school children and on
asthma-like symptoms of children who
had been classified as sensitive."
July 2009
E-180
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Moshammeret al. (2006,
Outcome: Respiratory symptoms and
Pollutant: PM10
PM Increment: 10/yglm3
090771)
decreased lung function
Averaging Time: 8-h
% change in Lung Function per
Period of Study: 2000-2001
Age Groups: Children ages 7-10
Mean (SD): Maximum 24 h: 76.39
10/yg/m3
Location: Linz, Austria
Study Design: Time-series
Annual avg: 19.06
FEV: 0.11
N: 163 children
FVC: 0.06
Percentiles: 8-h mean
Statistical Analyses: GEE model
25th: 14.39
FEVob: -0.19
Covariates: Sex, age, height, weight
MEFjb*: -0.30
8-h mean 50th(Median): 24.85
Dose-response Investigated? NR
8-h mean 75th: 38.82
MEFbo%: -0.36
Statistical Package: NR
MEF2b%: 0.41
Monitoring Stations: 1 station
Lags Considered: 1
PEF: 0.22
Copollutant (correlation): PMi
r - 0.91
% change in Lung Function per IQR
FEV:-0.27
PM2.6
FVC: -0.07
r - 0.93
FEVob: -0.47
NO?
MEFjb*: -0.74
r - 0.62
CD
CO
O
s?
uf
LLI
2
MEF2b%: 0.98
PEF:-0.54
Reference: Neuberger et al. (2004,
093249)
Period of Study: Sept 1999-March
2000
Location: Vienna, Austria
Outcome: Ratio measure: Time to peak Pollutant: PMio
tidal expiratory flow divided by total
expiration time (i.e., tidal lung function, a Averaging Time: 24-h
surrogate for bronchial obstruction)
Age Groups: 3.0-5.9 years (preschool
children)
Study Design: Longitudinal prospective
cohort
N: 56 children
Statistical Analyses: mixed models
linear regression, with autoregressive
correlation structure
Covariates: Age, sex, respiratory rate,
phase angle, temperature, kindergarten,
parental education, observer (also in
sensitivity analyses: height, weight,
cold/sneeze on same day, heating with
fossil fuels, hair cotinine, number of tidal
slopes used to measure tidal lung
function)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS 8.0
Lags Considered: 0
Copollutant (correlation): PM2.B
(r - 0.94) in Vienna
PM Increment: Interquartile range (NR)
Change in mean associated with an IQR
increase in PM (p-value)
¦1.067 (0.241)
lag 0
July 2009
E-181
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Neuberger et al. (2004,
093249)
Period of Study: Oct. 2000-May 2001
Location: Linz, Austria
Outcome: Forced oscillatory resistance
(at zero Hz), FVC, FEVi, MEF26, MEFbo,
MEFjb, PEF
Age Groups: 7-10 years
Study Design: Longitudinal prospective
cohort
N: 164 children
Statistical Analyses: mixed models
linear regression with autoregressive
correlation structure
Covariates: sex, time and individual
Season: Oct-May
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 0-7
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24-h
Monitoring Stations: 1
PM Increment: 1 //g|m3
Notes: No significant associations
between PM10 and the metrics of lung
function were reported. The authors
state they only reported significant
associations, so results are assumed to
be null.
Reference: Odajima et al. (2008,
192005)
Period of Study: April 2003-March
2004
Location: Fukuoka, Japan
Outcome: Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)
Study Design: Panel/Field
Statistical Analysis: GEE
Statistical Package: SAS
Covariates: Age, Sex, Growth Index,
Temperature, NO2, O3
Age Groups: Asthmatic children, 4-11
years old
Pollutant: PM10
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Averaging Time: 3h
Relative Risk (Min CI, Max CI)
Mean (SD) Unit:
Lag
Warmer Months, 5-8am
April-September, Morning Sample, Multi-
pollutant
SPM: 40.7 /yglm3
SPM, 5am-8am: -0.6 (-1.228, 0.028)
NO2:15.2 ppb
SPM, 2am-5am: -0.78 (-1.399,-0.161)
O3: 17.7 ppb
SPM, 11pm-2am: -0.612 (-1.180, -0.045)
Warmer Months, 7-10pm
SPM, 8pm-11am: -0.732 (-1.318, -0.145)
SPM: 41.5/yg/m3
O3, 5am-8am: -0.575 (-1.569, 0.419)
NO2: 20.0 ppb
O3, 2am-5am: -0.052 (-0.997, 0.893)
O3: 28.1 ppb
0s, 11 pm-2am: -0.305 (-1.269, 0.658)
Colder Months, 5-8am
03,8pm-11am:-0.416 (-1.283, 0.451)
SPM: 32.6//gfm3
NO2, 5am-8am:-0.3 (-2.246,1.645)
NO2: 20.5 ppb
NO2, 2am-5am: 0.265 (-1.354,1.885)
O3: 17.5 ppb
NO2,11pm-2am: -0.187 (-1.447,1.073)
Colder Months, 7-10pm
NO2, 8pm-11am: 0.432 (-0.689,1.553)
SPM: 34.7 //gfm3
Single-Pollutant Model
NO2: 28.0 ppb
SPM, 5am-8am:-0.67 (-1.236,-0.104)
O3: 19.4 ppb
SPM, 2am-5am: -0.761 (-1.328, -0.194)
Range (Min, Max):
SPM, 11 pm-2am:-0.661 (-1.159,-0.163)
Warmer Months, 5-8am
SPM, 8pm-11 am: -0.714 (-1.212, -0.215)
SPM: (11.0,126.0)
NO2: (1.3,44.7)
Evening Sample, Multi-pollutant Model
0s: (0.3, 52.3)
SPM, 7pm-10pm: -0.449 (-1.071, 0.174)
SPM, 4pm-7pm: -0.434 (-1.122, 0.254)
Warmer Months, 7-10pm
SPM
SPM: (8.3,191.3)
NO2: (3.0,51.3)
1pm-4pm: -0.415 (-1.015, 0.184)
SPM
0s: (1.3, 71.3)
10am-1pm:-0.522 (-1.199, 0.155)
Colder Months, 5-8am
SPM: (9.0,160.0)
O3, 7pm-10pm: -0.22 (-1.171,0.731)
NO2: (1.3,44.0)
0s, 4pm-7pm: -0.118 (-0.809, 0.574)
0s
O3: (0.6, 48.7)
July 2009
E-182
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Colder Months, 7-1 Opm
SPM: (10.3,131.0)
N(k (3.6,49.0)
0s: (1.0, 60.0)
Copollutant (correlation):
Warmer Months (24h Mean):
0s
r - 0.32
NO?
r - 0.30
Colder Months (24h Mean):
0s
r - -0.02
NO?
r - 0.45
1pm-4pm:-1.086 (-0.888, 0.516)
0s
10am-1pm:-0.315 (-1.123, 0.493)
NO2, 7pm-10pm: 0.296 (-0.806,1.397)
NO2,4pm-7pm: 0.220 (-0.818,1.258)
NO2
1pm-4pm: 0.438 (-0.568,1.444)
NO2
10am-1 pm: 0.536 (-0.546,1.617)
Single-pollutant Model
SPM, 7pm-10pm: -0.449 (-0.956, 0.058)
SPM, 4pm-7pm: -0.449 (-1.029, 0.131)
SPM
1pm-4pm:-0.414 (-0.943, 0.115)
SPM
10am-1pm:-0.486 (-1.051, 0.079)
October-March, Morning Sample, Multi-
pollutant
SPM, 5am-8am: 0.290 (-0.279, 0.859)
SPM, 2am-5am: 0.431 (-0.173,1.036)
SPM, 11pm-2am: 0.304 (-0.311, 0.919)
SPM, 8pm-11am: 0.010 (-0.523, 0.543)
O3, 5am-8am: -0.415 (-1.568, 0.738)
03, 2am-5am: -0.046 (-1.245,1.153)
O3,11pm-2am: 0.004 (-1.265,1.273)
0a, 8pm-11am: -0.470 (-2.017,1.077)
NO2, 5am-8am:-0.319 (-2.269,1.631)
NO2, 2am-5am: 0.262 (-1.777, 2.300)
NO2,11pm-2am: 0.609 (-1.132, 2.350)
NO2, 8pm-11am: 0.155 (-1.545,1.856)
Single-Pollutant Model
SPM, 5am-8am: 0.308 (-0.189, 0.805)
SPM, 2am-5am: 0.485 (-0.026, 0.996)
SPM, 11pm-2am: 0.486 (-0.049,1.022)
SPM, 8pm-11am: 0.100 (-0.414, 0.613)
Evening Sample, Multi-pollutant Model
SPM, 7pm-10pm: 0.059 (-0.397, 0.515)
SPM, 4pm-7pm: 0.360 (-0.093, 0.812)
SPM
1pm-4pm: 0.357 (-0.157, 0.871)
SPM
10am-1pm: 0.169 (-0.394, 0.731)
0a, 7pm-10pm: -0.656 (-2.394,1.083)
0s, 4pm-7pm: 0.046 (-1.140,1.232)
0s
July 2009
E-183
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
1pm-4pm: 0.164 (-1.038,1.365)
0s
10am-1pm: 0.665 (-0.613,1.942)
N02,7pm-10pm:-0.415 (-2.444,1.613)
NO2,4pm-7pm:-0.144 (-1.490,1.202)
NO2
1pm-4pm:-0.181 (-1.821,1.459)
NO2
10am-1pm: 0.194 (-1.503,1.890)
Single-pollutant Model
SPM, 7pm-10pm: 0.071 (-0.388, 0.529)
SPM, 4pm-7pm: 0.318 (-0.123, 0.758)
SPM
1pm-4pm: 0.317 (-0.171, 0.804)
SPM
10am-1 pm: 0.112 (-0.412, 0.636)
July 2009
E-184
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Peacock et al. (2003, Outcome: Reduced peak expiratory flow
042026) rate (PEFR)
Period of Study: 11/1/1996-2/14/1997 Age Groups: 7-13 years of age
Location: Southern England Study Design: Time-series
N: 179
Statistical Analyses: GEE, multiple
regression
Covariates: Day of the week, 24-h mean
outside temperature.
Season: winter
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: STATA
Lags Considered: Same day, lag 1, lag
2, five day moving avg
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: daily
Mean (SD): Rural (nationally validated)
21.2(11.3)
Rural (locally validated) 18.7 (11.3)
Urban 1 18.4(9.8)
Urban 2 22.7 (10.6)
Percentiles: 10th
Rural (nationally validated) 11.0
Rural (locally validated) 9.0
Urban 1 10.5
Urban 2 12.5
90th
Rural (nationally validated) 33.0
Rural (locally validated) 32.5
Urban 1 32.0
Urban 2 36.0
Range (Min, Max): Rural (nationally
validated) 7.0, 82.0
Rural (locally validated) 6.6, 87.9
Urban 1 4.7, 62.8
Urban 2 6.7, 63.7
Monitoring Stations: 3Copollutants:
NO?
0s
SO?
S042"
Increment: 10/yg/m3
Odds Ratio (Lower CI, Upper CI)
Lag
Change in PEFR
Community
¦0.04 (-0.11,0.03)
0
0.03 (-0.04, 0.05)
1
¦0.01 (-0.07, 0.05)
2
¦0.10 (-0.25, 0.05)
0-4 avg
Local
¦0.01 (-0.06, 0.03)
0
0.04 (0.01,0.08)
1
0.01 (-0.04,0.05)
2
0.04 (-0.05,0.13)
0-4 avg
20% decrease in PEFR
All children
1.012(0.992,1.031)
0
1.016(0.995,1.036)
1
1.013(1.000,1.025)
2
1.037 (0.992,1.084)
0-4 avg
Wheezy Children Only
1.016(0.986,1.047)
0
1.030 (1.001,1.060)
1
1.018(0.995,1.041)
2
1.114(1.057,1.174)
0-4 avg
July 2009
E-185
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Peled, et al (2005,156015)
Period of Study: 5-6 weeks between
March-June 1999 and September-
December 1999.
Location: Ashdod, Ashkelon and Sderot,
Israel
Outcome: Reduced peak expiratory flow
(PEF)
Age Groups: 7-10 years
Study Design: Nested cohort study
N: 285
Statistical Analyses: Time series
analysis, generalized linear model, GEE,
one-way ANOVA
Covariates: seasonal changes,
meteorological conditions and personal
physiological, clinical and socioeconomic
measurements
Season: spring, autumn
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: STATA
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: daily
Mean:
Ashkelon: 67.1
Sderot: 52.9
Ashdod: 31.0
PM Component: Local industrial
emissions, desert dust, vehicle emissions
and emissions from two electric power
plants
Monitoring Stations: 6
Copollutant: PM2.6
PM Increment: 1 /yglm3
(3 coefficient (SE) [95% CI]
Sderot:
PMio MAX: -0.34 (0.41)1-1.16, 0.46]
PMio MAX x sin(~ 2 day): 0.84 (0.22)
[0.405,1.28]
PMio MAX x cos (n1 day): -1.61 (0.41) [¦
2.43, 0.79]
PMio MAX x sin (n1 day): 0.44 (0.120) [¦
0.68-0.21]
In Sderot, an interaction between PMio
and the sequential day were significantly
associated with PEF.
Reference: Pitard, et al (2004, 087433) Outcome: Respiratory drug sales
Period of Study: 732 days (July 1998-
June 2000)
Location: City of Rouen, France
Age Groups: 0-14,15-64, 65-74, over
75 years
Study Design: Ecological time-series
N: 106,592
Statistical Analyses: Generalized
additive model
Covariates: Days of the weeks, trend,
seasonal variations, influenza epidemics,
meteorological variables, holidays
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: S-plus
Lags Considered: 0 to 10 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: daily
Mean (SD): 16.7 (13.3)
Percentiles:
25th: 8.00
50th(Median): 13.0
75th: 20
Range (Min, Max): 2.00,126
Monitoring Stations: 2
Copollutant (correlation): SO2 (0.39)
NO? (0.61)
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Percent increase in sales of anti-
asthmatics and bronchodilators (Lower
CI, Upper CI)
6.2(2.4,10.1)
lag 10 days
Percent increase in sales of cough and
cold preparation for children under 15
years of age (Lower CI, Upper CI)
9.2(5.9,12.6)
10 days
July 2009
E-186
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Preutthipan et al. (2004,
055598)
Period of Study: 31 days (school days)
from January 14 to February 26,1999
Location: Mae Pra Fatima School,
central Bangkok, Thailand
Outcome: Decreases in peak expiratory
flow rates (PEFR), respiratory symptoms
including wheeze, shortness of breath,
runny/stuffed nose, sneezing, cough,
phlegm, and sore throat
Age Groups: Third to ninth grade
Study Design: Time- Series
N: 133 children (93 asthmatics, 40
nonasthmatics)
Statistical Analyses: For continuous
data, an unpaired t-test or Mann-Whitney
U test was used. For categorical data,
the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test
was used. One way analysis of
covariance (ANCOVA) was used to
compare avg daily reported respiratory
symptoms, diurnal PEFR variability, and
the prevalence of PEFR decrements
between groups of days.
Covariates: Age, sex, weight, height,
parents smoking, person smoking in
home, daily number of household
cigarettes, air-conditioned bedroom, fuel
used for cooking (charcoal, gas), distance
from home to main road
Dose-response Investigated? No
Lags Considered: Up to 5 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: daily
Mean (SD): 111.0 (39)
Range (Min, Max): 46, 201
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant:
SO?
CO
Os
PM Increment: Authors classified
exposure according to High and Low PMio
days:
High - > 120 /yglm3
Low - < 120 /yglm3
Daily reported respiratory symptoms and
diurnal PEFR variability as classified by
concurrent days with high vs. low PMio
Mean % reporting (SEM)
Asthmatics: High PMio
Wheeze/shortness of breath - 21.3 (1.4)
Runny/stuffed nose or sneezing - 42.3
(1.8)
Cough - 59.9 (1.9)
Phlegm - 60.5 (2.3)
Sore throat - 23.7 (1.5)
Any respiratory symptoms - 72.2 (3.2)
Diurnal PEFR variability - 3.0 (0.4)
Asthmatics: Low PMio
Wheeze/shortness of breath - 19.3 (1.3)
Runny/stuffed nose or sneezing - 35.8
(1.6)
Cough - 59.1 (1.6)
Phlegm - 58.6 (2.0)
Sore throat - 21.0 (1.4)
Any respiratory symptoms - 63.8 (2.8)
Diurnal PEFR variability - 2.8 (0.3)
Nonasthmatics: High PMio
Wheeze/shortness of breath - 11.7(1.4)
Runny/stuffed nose or sneezing - 40.9
(2.5)
Cough - 50.4 (2.6)
Phlegm - 50.2 (2.5)
Sore throat - 27.1 (1.7)
Any respiratory symptoms - 67.8 (3.7)
Diurnal PEFR variability - 2.4 (0.4)
Nonasthmatics: Low PMio
Wheeze/shortness of breath - 9.3 (1.2)
Runny/stuffed nose or sneezing - 33.1
(2.2)
Cough - 54.0 (2.2)
Phlegm - 49.9 (2.2)
Sore throat - 23.9 (1.5)
Any respiratory symptoms - 56.4 (3.2)
Diurnal PEFR variability - 2.1 (0.4)
Notes: None of the daily reported
respiratory symptoms had significant
direct correlations with daily PMio levels,
according to the authors.
July 2009
E-187
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Rabinovitch et al. (2004,
096753)
Periods of Study: 11/15/1999-
311512000
11/13/2000-3/23/2001
11/15/2001-3/22/2002
Location: Denver, Colorado
Outcome: Respiratory symptoms,
Asthma symptoms (cough and wheeze),
Upper respiratory symptoms
Study Design: Time-series panel
Statistical Analyses: Logistic linear
regression
Age Groups: 6-12
Pollutants: PMio
Averaging Time:
24-h avg
Mean (SD): 28.1 (13.2)
Range (Min, Max):
(6.0,102.0)
Copollutant:
CO
NO?
SO?
0s
Increment: 1 //gf'nr1
PISE)
AM:-0.010 (0.008)
PM:-0.011 (0.010)
Odds Ratio (Lower CI, Upper CI)
Lag
1.016(0.911,1.133)
0-3 avg.
OR for respiratory symptoms and PMio
exposure for children age 6-12
Asthma exacerbation: 1.00 (0.75,1.25)
0-3 avg
Medication: 0.85 (0.75, 0.95)
0-3 avg
Previous night's symptoms: 1.10 (1.00,
1.20)
0-3 avg
Current day's symptoms: 1.00 (0.90,
1.10)
0-3 avg
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
Lag
% Increase in FEVi or PEF and PMio
exposure for children age 6-12
AM FEVi:-0.01 (-0.02,0.01)
0-3 avg
PM FEVi:-0.02 (-0.03, 0.02)
0-3 avg
AM PEF: -0.025 (-0.035,0.02)
0-3 avg
PM PEF: 0.00(-0.03, 0.03)
0-3 avg.
Reference: Renzetti et al, 2009
Outcome: Airway inflammation and
Pollutant: PMio
All results are presented in figure format.
function
Period of Study:
Averaging Time: daily
Study Design: Panel
Covariates: NR
6/1/06-7/31/06
Mean (SD) Unit:
Location: Pescara and Ovindoli, Italy
Urban: 56.9 ± 13.1 /yg/m3
Rural: 13.8 ± 5.6/yg/m3
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Statistical Analysis: Student T-test,
Pearson's correlation coefficients
Statistical Package: StatView
Age Groups: Children, mean age 9.9
years
Reference: Rojas-Martinez et al. (2007,
Outcome: Lung function: FEVi, FVC,
Pollutant: PMio
PM Increment: IQR
091064)
FEF25-75%
Averaging Time: 24-h, 6-mo
PMio, 6-LC: 36.4
Period of Study: 1996-1999
Age Groups: Children 8 years old at time
Mean (SD): 24-h averaging
GIRLS
of cohort recruitment
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Study Design: school-based "dynamic"
Tlalnepantla: 66.7 (35.6)
One-pollutant model
cohort study
Xalostoc: 96.7 (49.4)
FVC: -39 [-47:-31]
N: 3170 children
Merced: 79.3 (40.8)
FEV: -29 [-36: -21]
14,545 observations
Pedregal: 53.4 (31.9)
FEF2e-7e«:-17 [-36: 1]
July 2009
E-188
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Statistical Analyses: Three-level
generalized linear mixed models with
unstructured variance-covariance matrix
Covariates: age, body mass index,
height, height by age, weekday spent
outdoors, environmental tobacco smoke,
previous-day mean air pollutant
concentration, time since first test
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 0-1 days
Cerro de la Estrella: 69.6 (35.3)
6-mo averaging
Mean: 75.6
Percentiles: 6-mo averaging
25th: 55.8
50th(Median): 67.5
75th: 92.2
Monitoring Stations: 5 sites for PMio,
10 for other pollutants
Copollutant: 0:i
NO?
FEVi/FVC: 0.12(0.07: 0.17]
Two-pollutant model
PMio, 6-LC & 0s
FVC: -30 [-39:-22]
FEV: -24 [-31:-16]
FEF2b-7b%: -9 [-26: 9]
FEVi/FVC: 0.10 [0.06: 0.15]
PMio, 6-LC & NO?
FVC:-21 [-30:-13]
FEV: -17 [-25: -8]
FEF2B-7B*: -23 [-43: -4]
FEVi/FVC: 0.07 [0.02: 0.13]
Multipollutant model
PMio, 6-LC, Os, & NO?
FVC:-14 [-23:-5]
FEV:-11 [-20: -3]
FEF2B7B*: -7 [-27: 12]
FEVi/FVC: 0.08(0.03: 0.13]
BOYS
One-pollutant model
FVC:-33 [-41:-25]
FEV: -27 [-34: -19]
FEF2b-7b%:-18 [-34: -2]
FEVi/FVC: 0.04 [-0.01:0.09]
Two-pollutant model
PMio, 6-LC & Os
FVC: -28 [-36:-19]
FEV: -22 [-30:-15]
FEF2b-7b%:-10 [-27: 7]
FEVi/FVC: 0.04 [-0.01:0.09]
PMio, 6-LC & NO?
FVC: -16 [-26:-7]
FEV: -19 [-27:-10]
FEF2b-7b%: -26 [-44: -9]
FEVi/FVC: 0.005 [-0.06: 0.05]
Multipollutant model
PMio, 6-LC, Os, & NO?
FVC: -12 [-22: -3]
FEV: -15 [-23: -6]
FEF2b-7b%:-12 [-30: 6]
FEVi/FVC:-0.002 [-0.06: 0.05]
Long-term exposure to O3, PMio, and NO2
is associated with decrements in FVC and
FEVi growth in Mexico City
schoolchildren. In a multipollutant model,
PMio (-12%), Os (-9%), and NOz (-41%)
each contribute independently and
_^tatisticaM^si2nificantl^^o_dmi^mshed__
July 2009
E-189
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
FVC growth. For FEVi, however, the
multipollutant model indicates that only
PMio (-15%) and NO2 (-25%) each
contribute independently and statistically
significantly to diminished FEVi growth.
Reference: Sahsuvaroglu et al, 2009
Period of Study: 1994-1995
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Outcome: Asthma symptoms
Study Design: Panel
Covariates: Neighborhood income,
dwelling value, state of housing,
deprivation index, smoking
Statistical Analysis: Logistic
regressions
Statistical Package: SPSS
N:6388
Age Groups: Children in grades 1 and 8
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 3 year averages
Average:
All Subjects: 20.90/yglm3
Boys: 20.88 /yglm3
Girls: 20.92/yglm3
Range:
All Subjects: 26.98
Boys: 26.98
Girls: 20.10
Copollutant (correlation!:
NOxTheissen: 0.083
S02Theissen: -0.021
OsTheissen: -0.251
IMOzKriged: 0.126
NO2LUR: 0.072
Increment: NR
Odds Ratio (95%CI) for copollutant
model PMioSpline and NO2LUR
All Girls: 1.063 (0.969-1.666)
Older Girls: 1.058 (0.918-1.219)
Odds Ratio (95%CI) for copollutant
model PMioSpline and NO2LUR,
SOzTheissen and OsTheissen
All Girls: 1.045 (0.943-1.158)
Older Girls: 1.044(0.891-1.225)
Regression coefficients (95%CI)
between non-allergic asthma and
PMioSpline exposure
All Children: 1.043 (0.996-1.092)
Younger Children: 1.011 (0.929-1.100)
Older Children: 1.073(1.013-1.136)
All Girls: 1.069 (0.999-1.144)
All Boys: 1.024 (0.962-1.091)
Younger Girls: 1.065 (0.943-1.203)
Younger Boys: 0.962 (0.853-1.085)
Older Girls: 1.072 (0.984-1.169)
Older Boys: 1.075 (0.995-1.160)
Reference: Sanchez-Carrillo et al. (2003, Outcome: Upper respiratory symptom
indicator (wet cough, sore throat,
hoarseness, nose dryness, and head cold)
098428)
Period of Study: 1996-1997
Location: metropolitan Mexico City,
Mexico
Lower respiratory symptom indicator (dry
cough, lack of air, and chest sounds)
and Ocular symptom indicator (eye
irritation, eye itch, eye burning, teary
eyes, red eyes, and eye infection)
Age Groups: All ages
Study Design: Cohort
N: 151,418 interviews
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression models
Covariates: sex, age, education,
cigarette smoking, season, emergency
episode mass media report, temperature,
and relative humidity
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 1
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD):
Northeast: 132 (52)
Northwest: 87 (46)
Central: 85 (37)
Southeast: 79 (35)
Southwest: 55 (28)
Range (Min, Max):
Northeast: (34-269)
Northwest: (10-275)
Central: (9-319)
Southeast: (14-225)
Southwest: (12-264)
Monitoring Stations: Up to 32
Copollutant (correlation):
0s: r - 0.067
0s 8: 00-18: 00 h: r - 0.075
SO2: r - 0.265
NO2: r - 0.265
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
PM10 quartiles 10.04-52.62 (ref) 52.63-
73.58
Upper respiratory indicator: 1.02 (0.99-
1.06)
Lower respiratory indicator: 1.04 (0.99-
1.09)
Ocular indicator: 0.99 (0.95-1.03) 73.59-
101.91
Upper respiratory indicator: 1.07 (1.03-
1.10)
Lower respiratory indicator: 1.09 (1.04-
1.14)
Ocular indicator: 0.89 (0.86-
0.92)101.92-318.80
Upper respiratory indicator: 0.93 (0.90-
0.97)
Lower respiratory indicator: 1.03 (0.98-
1.08)
Ocular indicator: 0.84 (0.81-0.87)
Northeast - 2nd quartile
Upper respiratory indicator: 0.354
(0.112-1.222)
Lower respiratory indicator: 0.215
(0.040-1.160)
Ocular indicator: 1.080 (0.915-1.274)
3rd quartile
July 2009
E-190
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Upper respiratory indicator: 0.118
(0.039-0.356)
Lower respiratory indicator: 0.126
(0.023-0.690)
Ocular indicator: 1.228 (0.720-2.095)
4th quartile
Upper respiratory indicator: 0.095
(0.034-0.267)
Lower respiratory indicator: 0.119
(0.026-0.549)
Ocular indicator: 0.878 (0.619-1.246)
Northwest - 2nd quartile
Upper respiratory indicator: 0.990
(0.898-1.090)
Lower respiratory indicator: 1.246
(1.087-1.429)
Ocular indicator: 1.218 (0.808-1.834)
3rd quartile
Upper respiratory indicator: 1.133
(0.974-1.317)
Lower respiratory indicator: 1.202
(1.044-1.385)
Ocular indicator: 0.345 (0.125-0.951)
4th quartile
Upper respiratory indicator: 1.019
(0.904-1.149)
Lower respiratory indicator: 1.344
(1.137-1.589)
Ocular indicator: 1.949 (1.416-2.683)
Central - 2nd quartile
Upper respiratory indicator: 1.088
(1.002-1.183)
Lower respiratory indicator: 1.046
(0.930-1.176)
Ocular indicator: 1.220 (1.115-1.335)
3rd quartile
Upper respiratory indicator: 1.054
(0.977-1.137)
Lower respiratory indicator: 1.055
(0.948-1.175)
Ocular indicator: 1.049 (0.965-1.142)
4th quartile
Upper respiratory indicator: 0.899
(0.826-0.979)
Lower respiratory indicator: 0.952
(0.845-1.073)
Ocular indicator: 0.875 (0.796-0.963)
Southeast - 2nd quartile
Upper respiratory indicator: 0.778
(0.575-1.052)
Lower respiratory indicator: 1.047
(0.916-1.196)
Ocular indicator: 0.460 (0.299-0.708)
July 2009
E-191
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
3rd quartile
Upper respiratory indicator: 1.297
(1.127-1.491)
Lower respiratory indicator: 1.391
(1.131-1.711)
Ocular indicator: 0.474 (0.314-0.715)
4th quartile
Upper respiratory indicator: 0.893
(0.812-0.983)
Lower respiratory indicator: 0.937
(0.818-1.073)
Ocular indicator: 0.314 (0.182-0.542)
Southwest - 2nd quartile
Upper respiratory indicator: 0.987
(0.913-1.066)
Lower respiratory indicator: 2.181
(1.177-4.040)
Ocular indicator: 1.026 (0.928-1.135)
3rd quartile
Upper respiratory indicator: 0.673
(0.673-1.886)
Lower respiratory indicator: 0.899
(0.790-1.024)
Ocular indicator: 1.017 (0.862-1.200)
4th quartile
Upper respiratory indicator: 0.524
(0.524-1.787)
Lower respiratory indicator: 4.346
(0.917-20.606)
Ocular indicator: 0.187 (0.090-0.387)
Reference: Schildcrout et al. (2006,
089812)
Period of Study: November 1993 to
September 1995
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Baltimore, Maryland
Boston, Massachusetts
Denver, Colorado
San Diego, California
Seattle, Washington
St. Louis, Missouri
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Outcome: Asthma Symptoms, Rescue
Inhaler Uses
Age Groups: 5 to 12 year olds
Study Design: Meta-analysis of CAMP
l\l: 990 children
Statistical Analyses: "Working
independence covariance structure"
Logistic Regression
Poisson Regression
"GEE Procedure"
Covariates: Season, age, race-ethnicity,
annual family income, day of the week
Dose-response Investigated?
Statistical Package: SAS 8.2
R
Lags Considered: 0 day lag, 1 day lag, 2
day lag, 3-day moving sum
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h averages
Seattle: Daily
Albuquerque: Daily
Baltimore: 50% of study days measured
Boston: 23% of study days measured
Denver: 37% of study days measured
San Diego: 24% of study days measured
St. Louis: 19% of study days measured
Toronto: 47% of study days measured
Percentiles: 10th: 6.8-14.0
25th: 12.0-22.4
50th(Median): 17.7-32.4
75th: 26.2-42.7
90th: 32.5-53.9
Monitoring Stations: 1-12
Copollutant (correlation): NO2
r - 0.26-0.64
SO2 r - 0.31-0.65
Os r - 0.03-0.73
PM Increment: 25/yg/m3
One-pollutant Model
Asthma Symptoms: 1.02 [0.94,1.11]
0
1.01 [0.97,1.06]
1
1.02(0.98,1.07]
2
1.01 [0.98,1.05]
3-day moving sum
Rescue Inhaler Uses: [0.97,1.05]
0
[0.97,1.05]
1
1.00(0.97,1.03]
2
1.01 [0.98,1.03]
3-day moving sum
Two-pollutant Model
July 2009
E-192
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
CO r - 0.24-0.88
Asthma Symptoms:
CO-PMio
1.08 [1.01,1.15]
0
1.06[0.99,1.14]
1
1.08(1.02,1.14]
2
1.05(1.01,1.08]
3-day moving sum
NO2' PM10
1.06(0.99,1.13]
0
1.04 (0.97,1.11]
1
1.08(1.02,1.15]
2
1.04(1.00,1.07]
3-day moving sum
S02-PMio
1.05(0.98,1.13]; 0
1.04 (0.96,1.14]
1
1.05(0.98,1.12]
2
1.04 (0.99,1.08]
3-day moving sum
Rescue Inhaler Uses:
CO-PMio
1.06(0.99,1.13]
0
1.05(0.99,1.11]
1;
1.05(1.01,1.09]
2
1.03(1.00,1.07]
3-day moving sum
NO2' PM10
1.03(0.97,1.08]
0
1.03(0.98,1.08]
1
1.04(1.00,1.09]
2
1.02(1.00,1.05]
July 2009
E-193
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CTT
3-day moving sum
S02-PMio
1.01 [0.95,1.07]
0
1.02[0.97,1.07]
1
1.03[0.98,1.09]
2
1.02(0.98,1.05]
3-day moving sum
'All units expressed in //gfm3 unless otherwise specified.
Table E-10. Short-term exposure - respiratory morbidity outcomes - PM102.5.
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Aekplakorn et al.
(2003, 089908)
Period of Study: 107 days,
from October 1,1997 to
January 15,1998
Location: Mae Mo district,
Lampang Province, north
Thailand
Outcome: Upper respiratory symptoms,
lower respiratory symptoms, cough
Age Groups: 6-14 years old
Study Design: Logistic regression
N: 98 asthmatic school children
Statistical Analyses: Generalized
Estimating Equations, stratified
analysis, PR0C GENM0D
Covariates: Temperature and relative
humidity
Season: Winter
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS v 8.1
Pollutant: PMio-2 b
Averaging Time: daily
Mean (SD): NR
Range (Min, Max]: NR
Monitoring Stations: 3
Copollutant: PMio, SO2
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Odds Ratios [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Asthmatics:
URS: 1.04 (0.93,1.17)
lag 0
LRS: 1.09 (0.95,1.26)
lag 0
Cough: 1.08 (0.96,1.21)
lag 0
Non-Asthmatics:
URS: 1.05 (0.99,1.19)
lag 0
LRS: 0.90 (0.72,1.11)
lag 0
Cough: 0.95 (0.81,1.11)
lag 0
Reference: Bourotte et al.
(2007,150040)
Period of Study: 13 May
2002,19 July 2002
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Outcome: Peak expiratory flow (PEF)
Age Groups: Avg age 39.8 +/¦ 12.3
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 33 patients
Statistical Analyses: Linear mixed-
effects model
Covariates: Gender, Age, BMI, Air
Pollutants, Ambient temperature,
Relative Humidity
Season: Winter
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: S-plus
Lags Considered: 2 day lag, 3 day lag
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 21.7 (12.9)//g/m3
Range (Min, Max): (4.13, 62.0)
Components:
Na+
K+
Mg2+
Ca2+
Finf
CI-
NOs"
PM Increment: NR
Effect [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Morning PEF
Na+ concurrent day - -0.454 (-1.605, 0.697)
Na+ 2-day lag - -0.907 (-2.288, 0.474)
Na+ 3-day lag - -1.361 (-2.972, 0.251)
K+ concurrent day - 1.685 (-0.492, 3.862)
K+ 2-day lag - 1.838 (-1.272, 4.984)
K+ 3-day lag - 2.604 (-0.812, 6.025)
Mg2+ concurrent day - 2.265* (-0.427, 4.956)
Mg2+2-day lag - 1.271 (-1.869,4.410)
July 2009
E-194
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
SO42-
Monitoring Stations: 1
Mg2+ 3-day lag - 0.939 (-2.425,4.303)
Ca2+ concurrent day - 5.491 * (2.558, 8.424)
Ca2+ 2-day lag - 6.358* (2.251,10.465)
Ca2+3-day lag - 6.069 (1.962,10.176)
Fint concurrent day - 1.572 (-0.792, 3.935)
Fint 2-day lag - 1.630 (-1.679, 4.939)
Fint 3-day lag - 2.736* (-1.754, 7.226)
CI concurrent day - -0.951 (-2.238, 0.336)
CI 2-day lag --1.871 (-3.242 to-0.4997)
CI" 3-day lag - -2.286* (-3.934 to -0.638)1
NO3' concurrent day - 4.195* (-0.063, 8.452)
NOs"2-day lag - 6.292* (2.034,10.55)
NOs" 3-day lag - 7.341* (3.083,11.60)
S042~ concurrent day - 3.528 (-0.053, 7.110)
SO42- 2-day lag - 4.411 * (0.829, 7.991) |
SO42- 3-day lag - 6.175* (2.593, 9.756)
Evening PEF
Na+ concurrent day - -0.680 (-1.831, 0.471)
Na+ 2-day lag --1.90 (-3.316 to-0.494)
Na+ 3-day lag - -2.336* (-3.878 to -0.794)
K+ concurrent day - 0.613 (-1.564, 2.790)
K+ 2-day lag - 0.613 (-2.497, 3.723)
K+ 3-day lag - 0.000 (-3.421, 3.421) |
Mg2+ concurrent day - -0.718 (-3.522, 2.085)
Mg2+ 2-day lag - -1.933 (-5.073,1.206)
Mg2+ 3-day lag - -3.591 (-7.056 to -0.126)
Ca2+ concurrent day - 2.312* (-1.208, 5.832)
Ca2+ 2-day lag - 2.023 (-2.084, 6.130)
Ca2+3-day lag - 0.578 (-3.530,4.685)
Fint concurrent day - -1.281 (-3.644,1.083)
Fint 2-day lag - -2.503 (-5.930, 0.924)
Fint 3-day lag - -4.540 (-9.149, 0.068)
CI' concurrent day - -0.317 (-1.604, 0.970)
CI 2-day lag --1.268 (-2.556, 0.019)
CI 3-day lag --1.902 (-3.589 to-0.216)
NO3' concurrent day - 3.146 (-1.112, 7.404)
NOs" 2-day lag - 3.146 (-1.112,7.404)
NOs" 3-day lag - 1.049 (-3.209, 5.306)
S042~ concurrent day - 1.764 (-1.817, 5.346)
SO42- 2-day lag - 2.646 (-0.935, 6.228)
SO42- 3-day lag - 1.764 (-1.817, 5.346)
July 2009
E-195
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ebelt et al. (2005,
056907)
Check Ref: 2006,1st page: 396
Period of Study: Summer of
1998
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Outcome: spirometry
Age Groups: range from 54-86 yrs
mean age - 74 years
Study Design: extended analysis of e
repeated-measures panel study
N: 16 persons with C0PD
Statistical Analyses:
Earlier analysis expanded by developing
mixed-effect regression models and by
evaluating additional exposure indicators
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS V8
Pollutant: PM102 E
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD):
Ambient PMio-2.5: 5.6 (3.0)
Exposure to ambient PMio-2.5:
2.4(1.7)
Range (Min, Max): Ambient
PM102.B: (-1.2-11.9)
Exposure to ambient PMio-2.b: (¦
0.4-7.2)
Monitoring Stations: 5
Copollutant (correlation):
Ambient PMio: r- 0.69
Ambient PM2.6: r- 0.15
Nonsulfate Ambient PM2.6: r-
0.14
Exposure to Ambient PMio-2.b: r-
0.73
PM Increment: Ambient PMio-2.5: 4.5 (IQR)
Exposure to ambient PMio-2.5: 2.4 (IQR)
Notes: Effect estimates are presented in Figure 2 and
Electronic Appendix Table 1 (only available with electronic
version of article) and not provided quantitatively elsewhere.
Reference: Lagorio et
al.(2006, 089800)
Period of Study: 5/24/1999
to 6/24/1999 and 11/181999
to 12/22/1999
Location: Rome, Italy
Outcome: Lung function of subjects
(FVC and FEVi) with C0PD, Asthma
Age Groups: C0PD 50 to 80 yrs
Asthma 18 to 64 yrs
Study Design: Time series
N: C0PD N - 11
Asthma N - 11
Statistical Analyses: Non-parametric
Spearman correlation
GEE
Covariates: C0PD: daily mean
temperature, season variable (spring or
winter), relative humidity, day of week
Asthma: season variable, temperature,
humidity, and ~-2-agonist use
Season: Spring and winter
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: STATA
Lags Considered: 1-3 days
PM Size: PM10-2.B
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): Overall: 15.6(7.2)
Spring: 18.7 (7.4)
Winter: 12.3 (5.4)
Range (Min, Max): (3.4, 39.6)
PM Component:
Cd: 0.46±0.40 ng/m3
Cr: 1.9±1.7 ng/m3
Fe: 283 ± 167 ng/m3
Ni: 4.8±6.5 ng/m3
Pb: 30.6±19.0 ng/m3
Pt: 5.0±8.6 pg/m3
V: 1.8 ± 1.4 ng/m3
Zn: 45.8±33.1 ng/m3
Monitoring Stations: Two fixed
sites: (Villa Ada and Istituto
superior di Sanita)
Copollutant (correlation):
NO2 r - 0.51
O3 r - 0.31
CO r - -0.09
SO2 r - -0.16
PMior - 0.61
PM2.6 r - 0.34
PM Increment: 1 /yg/m3
They observed no statistically significant effect of PM 10-2.6
on FVC and FEVi on any of the panels (C0PD, Asthma).
fB Coefficient (SE)
C0PD
FVC(%)
24 h-1.32 (1.06)^1
48-h-1.46 (1.31)
72-h-1.38 (1.53)
FEVi(%)
24 h-0.59 (0.95)
48-h-1.01 (1.19)
72-h-0.90 (1.42)
Asthma
FVC(%)
24 h-0.17 (0.75)
48-h-0.36 (0.91)
72-h-0.24 (1.07)
FEVi(%)
24 h-0.67 (0.89)
48-h-1.19 (1.07)
72-h-0.51 (1.26)
July 2009
E-196
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: (Laurent et al.,
2008,156672)
Period of Study: 12/21/1003-
1213112004
Location: Strasbourg, France
Outcome: sales of short acting (3-
agonists
Study Design: Case-crossover
Covariates: NR
Statistical Analysis: Conditional
logistic regression
Age Groups: 0-39 years
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: NR
Mean (SD) Unit: 20.8(10.2)
Z^g/m3
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation): NO2,
0 i, correlations NR
Increment: 10//g/m3
Percent Increase in Short Acting p-agonists sold
Per increment increase in ambient PM10 at lags 4-7, a 7.5%
increase (95% CI: 4-11.2%) was seen in SABA sales.
All other results were given in figures 1 and 2
Reference: Tang et al. (2007,
091269)
Period of Study: Dec 2003 to
Feb 2005
Location: Sin-Chung City,
Taipei County, Taiwan
Outcome: Peak expiratory flow rate
(PEFR) of asthmatic children
Age Groups: 6-12 years
Study Design: Panel study
N: 30 children
Statistical Analyses:
Linear mixed-effect models were used to
estimate the effect of PM exposure on
PEFR
Covariates: Gender, age, BMI, history
of respiratory or atopic disease in
family, SHS, acute asthmatic
exacerbation in past 12 months,
ambient temperature and relative
humidity, presence of indoor pollutants,
and presence of outdoor pollutants,
Dose-response Investigated? yes
Statistical Package: S-Plus 2000
Lags Considered: 0-2
Pollutant: PM10-2.B
Averaging Time: 1 h
Mean (SD):
Personal: 17.8 (19.6)
Ambient: 17.0 (10.6)
Range (Min, Max):
Personal: 0.3-195.7
Ambient: 0.1-80.2
Monitoring Stations: 1
PM Increment: 15.9/yg/m3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Change in morning PEFR:
¦20.55 (-45.83, 4.73) lag 0
¦39.05 (-104.16, 26.06) lag 1
¦39.56 (-79.56, 0.44) lag 2
¦37.15 (-105.01, 30.7) 2-day mean
¦35.47 (-27.32, 56.38) 3-day mean
Change in evening PEFR:
¦1.68 (-19.13,15.78) lag 0
1.59 (-14.32,17.5) lag 1
0.86 (-30.84, 32.57) lag 2
5.97 (-15.57, 27.5) 2-day mean
29.75 (-1.69, 61.18) 3-day mean
Reference: Trenga et al.,
(2006,155209)
Period of Study: 1999-2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Outcome: Lung function: FEVi, PEF,
MMEF (maximal midexpiratory flow
assessed only for children)
Age Groups: Adults (56-89-years-old)
healthy & with C0PD
asthmatic children 6-13-years-old
Study Design: adult and pediatric panel
study over three years with 1
monitoring period ("session") per year
N: 57 adults (33 healthy, 24 with
C0PD) - 692 subject-days - 207
study-days
17 asthmatic children - 319 subject-
days - 98 study-days
Statistical Analyses: mixed effects,
longitudinal regression models, with the
effects of pollutant decomposed into
each subject's a) overall mean
b) difference between their session-
specific mean and overall mean
c) difference between their daily values
and session-specific mean
Covariates: gender, age, ventral site
temperature and relative humidity, CO,
NO?
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 0-1 days
Pollutant: PM10-2.B (coarse)
Averaging Time: 24-h
Percentiles:
Subject-specific exposure
PMio-PM2.b
Outdoor
25th: 3.3
50th (Median): 4.7
75th: 6.9
Adults
Outdoor
25th: 3.3
50th (Median): 5.0
75th: 7.1
Range (Min, Max):
Subject-specific exposure
Children
Outdoor (0.0, 25.3)
Adults
Outdoor (0.0, 25.7)
Monitoring Stations: 2
also subject-specific local
outdoors (i.e., at each home),
indoor, and personal
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Adult
Outdoor Home PMio-PM2.b
FEVi
Overall: Lag 0 -27.9 [-87.5: 31.8]
Lag 1 47.1 [-5.1:99.4]
No-COPD: Lag 0 -49.2 [-22.3: 23.9]
Lag 1 74.3 [6.8: 141.8]
C0PD: Lag 0 7.3 [-84.7: 99.4]
Lag 1 11.5[-65.4: 88.3]
PEF
Overall: Lag 0 5.3 [-5.1: 15.7]
Lag 1 -2.5 [-11.6: 6.5]
No-COPD: Lag 0 5.1 [-7.7: 17.8]
Lag 1 -5.8 [-17.5: 5.9]
C0PD: Lag 0 5.7 [-10.3: 21.6]
Lag 1 1.7[-11.5:14.9]
Pediatric
FEVi
Outdoor Home PMio-PM2.b
Overall
Lag 0 -7.43 [-69.41: 54.55]
Lag 1 -25.61 [-88.16: 36.94]
No Anti-inflam. Medication
July 2009
E-197
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Copollutant (correlation!:
CO
NO?
PM2.6
Lag 0 -63.87 [-199.58: 71.84]
Lag 1 -96.48 [-232.48: 39.52]
Anti-inflam. Medication
Lag 0 6.57 [-96.90: 110.04]
Lag 1 -8.63 [-217.39: 200.14]
PEF
Outdoor Home PMio-PM2.b
Overall
Lag 0 4.53 [-6.60: 15.67]
Lag 1 -3.35 [-14.31: 7.62]
No Anti-inflam. Medication
Lag 0 2.05 [-22.36: 26.45]
Lag 1 -6.56 [-30.90: 17.78]
Anti-inflam. Medication
Lag 0 5.15 [-7.90: 18.19]
Lag 1 -2.58 [-15.35: 10.19]
MMEF
Outdoor Home PMio-PM2.b
Overall
Lag 0 -0.01 [-7.29: 7.28]
Lag 1 -2.07 [-9.25: 5.12]
No Anti-inflam. Medication
Lag 0-7.14 [-23.16: 8.87]
Lag 1 -14.39 [-30.11: 1.32]
Anti-inflam. Medication
Lag 0 1.76 [-6.78: 10.30]
Lag 1 0.89 [-7.56: 9.33]
'All units expressed in //gfm3 unless otherwise specified.
Table E-11. Short-term exposure - respiratory morbidity outcomes - PM2.5 (including
components/sources).
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Adamkiewicz et al. (2004,
087925)
Period of Study: August-December
2000
Location: Steubenville, Ohio
Outcome: FENO
Age Groups: ranged 53.5-90.6 years
Study Design: prospective cohort
N: total of 294 breaths from 29 subjects
Statistical Analyses: Fixed effect
models, ANOVA, GLM procedure
Covariates: Subject, week of study, day
of the week, h of the day, ambient
barometric pressure, temperature, and
relative humidity
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: Hourly lags, 0-48 h
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 1 h
Mean (SD): 19.5
Percentiles: 25th: 7.6
75th: 25.5
Range (Min, Max]: NR, 105.!
Monitoring Stations: 1
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 19.7
Percentiles: 25th: 9.7
75th: 27.4
Range (Min, Max]: NR, 57.8
PM Increment: 17.9/yg/m3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
1-h Single pollutant models: 0.36 (0.58-
2.14)
PM Increment: 17.7
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
24 h moving avg: 1.45 (0.33-2.57)
Multipollutant models for PM2.6, ambient
NO and room NO and estimated change in
FENO (ppb) for an IQR in pollutant
measure
Model 1 1.95(0.47-3.43)
Model 2 1.38 (0.26-2.51)
July 2009
E-198
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation!: Ambient NO
Indoor NO
NO?;
Os
SO?
Model 4 1.97 (0.48-3.46)
Notes: Association of FENO with PM2.6 at
different lags presented in Figure 1 are
not presented quantitatively elsewhere.
Reference: Adar et al. (2007, 098635)
Period of Study: March-June 2002
Location: St. Louis, M0
Outcome: FENO
Age Groups: 60 +
Study Design: Panel Study
N: 44 non-smoking seniors
Statistical Analyses: mixed models
containing random subject effects
Covariates: Day of week, trip type,
FENO collection device, current illness,
use of vitamins, antihistamines, statins,
steroids, and asthma medications,
temperature, pollen, mold, NO
concentration in testing room
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 0
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): Pretrip: 14.8
Post-trip: 16.5
Percentiles:
25th (pretrip): 11.2
75th (pretrip): 20.1
25th (post-trip): 11.7
75th (post-trip): 21.6
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation): B0
CO
NO2
SO2
Os
PM Increment: 9.8 /yglm3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Pre-trip % change: 21.9 (6.7, 39.4)
Post-trip % change: -4.7 (-17.1, 9.6)
Reference: Aekplakorn et al (2003,
089908)
Period of Study: 107 days, from
October 1,1997 to January 15,1998
Location: Mae Mo district, Lampang
Province, north Thailand
Outcome: Upper respiratory symptoms,
lower respiratory symptoms, cough
Age Groups: 6-14 years old
Study Design: Logistic regression
N: 98 asthmatic school children
Statistical Analyses: Generalized
Estimating Equations, stratified analysis,
PROC GENMOD
Covariates: Temperature and relative
humidity
Season: Winter
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS v 8.1
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: daily
Mean (SD):
Sob Pad station: 24.77
Sob Mo station: 24.89
Hua Fai station: 26.27
Range (Min, Max):
Sob Pad: 4.52, 24.77
Sob Mo: 3.13, 24.89
Hua Fai: 3.67,26.27
Monitoring Stations: 3
Copollutant:
PM10
SO2
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3
Odds Ratios [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag: Asthmatics: URS: 1.04 (0.99,1.09)
lag 0
LRS: 1.05 (0.98,1.2)
lag 0
Cough: 1.05 (0.99,1.10)
lag 0
Non-Asthmatics: URS: 1.03 (0.96,1.09)
lag 0
LRS: 1.02 (0.93,1.10)
lag 0
Cough: 1.00 (0.93,1.07)
lag 0
PM10 + SO2
Asthmatics: URS: 1.04 (0.99,1.10)
lag 0
LRS: 1.05 (0.98,1.10)
lag 0
Cough: 1.05 (0.99,1.11)
lag 0
Non-Asthmatics: URS: 1.03 (0.97,1.09)
lag 0
LRS: 1.02 (0.93,1.11)
July 2009
E-199
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
lag 0
Cough: 1.00 (0.93,1.07)
lag 0
Reference: Allen et al (2008,156208)
Period of Study: 1999-2002 (additional
PM composition data collected Dec 2000
and May 2001)
Location: Seattle, USA
Outcome: daily changes in exhaled nitric
oxide (FENO) and 4 lung function
measures, midexpiratory flow (MEF),
peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced
expiratory volume in one second (FEVi),
and forced vital capacity (FVC)
Age Groups: 6-13 yrs
Study Design: Panel study
N: 19 children with asthma
Statistical Analyses: linear mixed
effects model with random intercept to
test for within participant associations
Covariates: Temperature, relative
humidity, BMI, age, and, in the case of
FENO, ambient NO measured at a
centrally located monitoring site
models also included a term for within-
participant, within-session effects, and a
term for participant between-session
effects
Effect modification: Decided a priori to
include interaction term for PM2.6
exposure and inhaled corticosteroids
Pollutant: PM2.6
Mean (SD): 11.23 (6.48)
Range (Min, Max):
2.76-40.38
25th: 6.38
75th: 14.73
Copollutant (correlation):
Ambient LAC* r—0.83
Ambient LG**r-0.84
Personal PM2.6: r - 0.34
Personal LAC: r-0.54
Ambient-generated PM2.6:
r—0.87
Nonambient-generated PM2.6: r--0.06
* LAC Light-absorbing carbon
** LG: Leroglucosan (a marker of wood
smoke)
Health effect estimates presented in
graphic form (Fig 1). Summary from text
is as follows:
Personal LAC, personal PM2.6, and
ambient-generated PM2.6 were associated
with (p < 0.05) and ambient PM2.6 was
marginally associated (p — 0.09) with
increased FENO. Neither of the ambient
combustion markers (LAC, LG) nor
nonambient-generated PM2.6 was
associated with FENO changes.
All of the ambient concentrations were
associated with decrements in PEF and
MEF while ambient-generated PM2.6 was
marginally associated (p < 0.10).
Only ambient LG was associated with a
decrease in FEVi and there were no
associations between exposure metrics
and FVC.
Reference: Barraza-Villarreal et al.(2008, Outcome: Respiratory Symptoms,
156254) Coughing, Wheezing, Airway
inflammation, Asthma
Period of Study: 6/2003-6/2005
Study Design: Prospective cohort
Location: Mexico City
Statistical Analyses: Bivarate analysis
Age Groups: 6-14
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: Maximum 8-h avg
Mean (SD) unit:
28.9 (2.8)
Range (Min, Max):
(4.2,102.8)
Copollutants (correlation):
0s
NO2
Increment: 17.5/yg/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Asthmatic children
Inflammatory Marker: FENO: 1.08 (1.01,
1.16)
0
IL-8: 1.08 (0.98,1.19)
0
phEBC:-0.03 (-0.09, 0.03)
0
Lung Function: FEVi: -16.0 (-31.0 to ¦
0.13)
0-4 avg
FVC:-23.0 (-42.0 to-5.21)
0-4 avg
FEV2B.7B: -11.0 (-42.0, 20.3)
0-4 avg
Nonasthmatic children
Inflammatory Marker: FENO: 0.89 (0.78,
1.01)
0
IL-8:1.16 (1.00,1.36)
0;
phEBC:-0.05 (-0.14, 0.04)
0
Lung Function: FEVi: -21.0 (-42.3, 0.38)
July 2009
E-200
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
0-4 avg
FVC: -29.0 (-52.8 to -4.35)
0-4 avg
FEV25-75: -20.0 (-69.0, 29.0)
0-4 avg
All children age 6-14
Respiratory Symptom: Cough: 1.11 (1.06,
1.17)
Wheezing: 1.06 (0.99,1.13)
Reference: Bennett et al. (2007,
156268)
Period of Study: 1992-2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Outcome: Adverse respiratory symptoms Pollutant: PM2.6
(wheeze, shortness of breath on waking,
cough in the morning, phlegm in the
morning, cough with phlegm in the
morning, asthma attack)
Age Groups: All ages with a mean of
37.2 yrs
Study Design: cohort study
N: 1446 persons
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression models
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 6.8
Range (Min, Max):
(1.8-73.3)
Monitoring Stations: 1
Covariates: Age, gender, current
smoking status, medication use (B2-
agonist and inhaled steroid), atopy
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: STATA statistical
software, version 9 (Statcorp, 2005)
PM Increment: 1 /yglm3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Within-person (longitudinal effects)
Wheeze: OR-1.08 (0.79-1.48)
SOB on waking: OR-1.34 (0.84-2.16)
Cough in the morning: OR -0.74 (0.47-
1.15)
Phlegm in the morning: OR -1.55 (0.95-
2.53)
Cough w/ phlegm morning: OR -1.28
(0.70-2.33)
Asthma attack: OR — 0.91 (0.55-1.49)
Betweenperson (cross-sectional) effects
Wheeze: OR-1.32 (0.82-2.10)
SOB on waking: OR -1.29 (0.46-3.60)
Cough in the morning: OR -0.21 (0.07-
0.62)
Phlegm in the morning: 0R-0.49 (0.16-
1.44)
Cough wf phlegm morning: OR -0.28
(0.08-0.97)
Asthma attack: OR — 0.52 (0.17-1.59)
Reference: Bourotte et al. (2007,
150040)
Period of Study: 13 May 2002-19 July
2002
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Outcome: Peak expiratory flow (PEF)
Age Groups: Avg age 39.8 +/¦ 12.3
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 33 patients
Statistical Analyses:
Linear mixed-effects model
Covariates: Gender, Age, BMI, Air
Pollutants, Ambient temperature, Relative
Humidity
Season: Winter
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: S-plus
Lags Considered: 2 day lag, 3 day lag
Pollutant: PM2.6 (Fine)
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 11.9 (5.12)
Range (Min, Max):
(2.82, 26.6)
Components:
K+
Mg2+
Ca2+
Finf
CI-
NOs-
S042-
Monitoring Stations: 1
PM Increment: NR
Effect [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Morning PEF
Na+ concurrent day - -0.409 (-2.485,
1.667)
Na+ 2-day lag --0.818 (-4.139, 2.503)
Na+ 3-day lag - -0.205 (-4.356, 3.974)
K+ concurrent day - -0.211 (-2.778,
2.357)
K+ 2-day lag - -0.843 (-4.695, 3.008)
K+ 3-day lag - 0.843 (-4.292, 5.978)
Mg2+ concurrent day - -1.750 (-5.302,
1.802)
Mg2+ 2-day I
Mg2+ 3-day I
-5.016 (-10.79, 0.762)
¦3.850 (-10.15, 2.449)
Ca2+ concurrent day - 3.192* (-0.599,
6.943)
Ca2+ 2-day lag - 5.880(1.105,10.65)
July 2009
E-201
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Ca2+3-day lag - 7.560* (2.103,13.02)
Fint concurrent day - 2.218* (-0.033,
4.470)
Fint 2-day lag - 3.697* (1.446, 5.949)
Fint 3-day lag -4.067* (1.065, 7.069)
CI' concurrent day --1.010 (-3.469,
1.450)
CI 2-day lag --1.615 (-5.714, 2.483)
CI 3-day lag --1.615 (-6.534, 3.303)
NO3' concurrent day - 3.144 (0.409,
5.878)
NOs" 2-day lag - 3.593 (0.858, 6.328)
NOs" 3-day lag - 4.491 (1.756,7.226)
S042~concurrent day - 2.210 (-0.032,
4.272)
SO42- 2-day lag - 3.180 (1.028, 5.332)
SO42- 3-day lag - 3.180 (1.028, 5.332)
Evening PEF
Na+ concurrent day - -1.636 (-3.712,
0.440)
Na+ 2-day lag --0.205 (-3.256, 3.117)
Na+3-day lag --1.023 (-5.174, 3.129)
K+ concurrent day - -1.897 (-4.465,
0.670)
K+ 2-day lag --1.686 (-5.966, 2.592)
K+ 3-day lag --1.054 (-6.189, 4.081)
Mg2+ concurrent day - -2.753 (-6.400,
0.894)
Mg2+ 2-day lag - -2.567 (-8.534, 3.401)
Mg2+3-day lag --4.876 (-11.36,1.612)
Ca2+ concurrent day - 2.184 (-1.567,
5.935)
Ca2+ 2-day lag - 5.040 (0.265,9.815)
Ca2+3-day lag - 5.040 (-0.417,10.50)
Fint concurrent day - 1.479 (-0.773,
3.730)
Fint 2-day lag - 1.819 (-0.403, 4.100)
Fint 3-day lag - 2.958 (-0.044, 5.960)
CI' concurrent day - -0.404 (-2.863,
2.055)
CI 2-day lag - 0.000 (-4.099, 4.099)
CI 3-day lag -0.202 (-4.716, 5.120)
NO3' concurrent day - 1.796 (-0.939,
4.531)
NO3" 2-day lag - 2.695 (-0.040, 5.430)
NO3" 3-day lag - 3.144(0.409,5.878)
S042~ concurrent day - 2.120 (-0.032,
4.272)
SO42- 2-day lag - 2.120 (-0.032,4.272)
SO42- 3-day lag -2.120 (-0.032, 4.272)
July 2009
E-202
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: de Hartog et al. (2003,
001061)
Period of Study: winter of 1998-1999
(in Amsterdam, from November 2,1998
to June 18,1999
in Erfurt, from October 12,1998 to April
4,1999
and in Helsinki, from November 2,1998
to April 30,1999.)
Location: Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Erfurt, Germany
and Helsinki, Finland
Outcome: Respiratory symptoms
Age Groups: a 50 yrs
Study Design: Cohort
N: 131 subjects with history of coronary
heart disease
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression
Covariates: Ambient temperature,
relative humidity, atmospheric pressure,
incidence of influenza-like illness
Season: Winter
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: S-PLUS 2000
Lags Considered: 0,1, 2, 3, and 5-day
avg
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD):
Amsterdam, the Netherlands: 20.0
Erfurt, Germany: 23.4
Helsinki, Finland: 12.8
Range (Min, Max):
Amsterdam, the Netherlands: (3.8-82.2)
Erfurt, Germany: (4.5-118.1)
Helsinki, Finland: (3.1-39.8)
Unit (i.e./yg/m3): //gfm3
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant:
PMio
NCo.oi-0.1
CO
NO?
SO?
PM Increment: 10 //gfm3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Association of air pollution and incidence
of symptoms in three panels of elderly
subjects
LagO
Chest pain w) physical exertion: 1.04
(0.96-1.13)
Shortness of breath: 1.04 (0.96-1.12)
Awakened, breathing problems: NA
Avoidance of activities: 1.04 (0.96-1.14)
Phlegm: 1.03(0.93-1.13)
Lag 1
Chest pain wf physical exertion: 1.01
(0.93-1.09)
Shortness of breath: 1.06 (0.99-1.14)
Awakened, breathing problems: 1.09
(1.00-1.20)
Avoidance of activities: 1.03 (0.95-1.12)
Phlegm: 1.10(1.01-1.19)
Lag 2
Chest pain wf physical exertion: 0.98
(0.90-1.05)
Shortness of breath: 1.05 (0.98-1.12)
Awakened, breathing problems: 1.04
(0.95-1.14)
Avoidance of activities: 1.05 (0.97-1.14)
Phlegm: 1.08(1.00-1.18)
Lag 3
Chest pain wf physical exertion: 1.00
(0.93-1.08)
Shortness of breath: 1.08 (1.01-1.15)
Awakened, breathing problems: 0.99
(0.91-1.08)
Avoidance of activities: 1.06 (0.98-1.14)
Phlegm: 1.10(1.01-1.19)
5-day
Chest pain wf physical exertion: 1.02
(0.91-1.13)
Shortness of breath: 1.12 (1.02-1.24)
Awakened, breathing problems: 1.03
(0.90-1.18)
Avoidance of activities: OR - 1.09 (0.97-
1.22)
Phlegm: OR- 1.16 (1.03-1.32)
Reference: Delfino et al. (2004, 056897) Outcome: FEVi
Age Groups: 9-19 years old
Study Design: Panel study
N: 24 children
Statistical Analyses: GLM
Period of Study: September-October
1999
April-June 2000
Location: Alpine, California
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-h avg 1-h max
personal PM last 24 h
Mean (SD): 151.0 (12.03) 90th: 292.4
Range (Min, Max): (9.1, 996.8)
Results presented graphically; -Percent
predicted FEVi was inversely associated
with personal exposure to fine particles.
¦ Inverse associations of FEVi with
stationary-site indoor, outdoor and
central-site gravimetric PM2.6 and PM10,
and with hourly TE0M PM10
July 2009
E-203
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Akaike's information criterion and
Bayesian information criterion
Covariates: Day of week, Personal
temperature and relative humidity, time
of FEVi maneuver (morning, afternoon, or
evening), Season (fall 1999 or spring
2000), As-needed medication use,
Presence or absence of upper or lower
respiratory infections
Season: Spring, Fall
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 0-4
Mean personal PM last 24 h
Mean (SD): 37.9(19.9)
90th: 65.1
Range (Min, Max): 3.9,113.8
Home stationary-site PM
24-h Mean indoor PM2.6
Mean (SD): 12.1 (5.4)
90th: 20.2
Range (Min, Max): 2.8, 35.3
24-h Mean outdoor PM2.6
Mean (SD): 11.0 (5.4)
90th: 18.4
Range (Min, Max): 1.8, 31.0
Central outdoor stationary-site PM
24-h Mean PM2.6
Mean (SD): 10.3 (5.6)
90th: 18.4
Range (Min, Max): 1.7, 29.1
Copollutant (correlation):
24-h Central HI PM2.1,
8-h max O3 - 0.24
8-h Max NO2 - 0.73
8-h Max Personal PM - 0.38
24-h Mean Personal PM - 0.43
8-h Max TE0M PM10 - 0.71
24-h Mean TEOMPM10 - 0.78
24-h Central HI PM10 - 0.90
24-h Outdoor HI PM2.1, - 0.89
24-h Outdoor HI PM10 - 0.72
24-h Indoor HI PM10- 0.40
24-h Indoor HI PM2 b - 0.73
Reference: Delfino et al. (2006, 090745) Outcome: Fractional Concentration of
Nitric Oxide in exhaled air (FEN0)
Period of Study: Region 1: August to
Mid December 2003. Region 2: July
through November 2004
Location: Region 1: Riverside, CA.
Region 2: Whittier, CA
Age Groups: 9 through 18
Study Design: Longitudinal Panel Study
N: 45 children
Riverside children
32 Whittier children
Statistical Analyses: Linear mixed-
effects models
Two-stage hierarchical model
Empirical Variograms
Fourth-order polynomial distributed lag
mixed-effects model
Covariates: Personal temperature,
Personal Rel. Humid., 10-day exposure
run, Respiratory infections, Region of
study, Sex, Cumulative daily use of as-
Pollutant: PM2.6
Personal Exposure
Averaging Time: 24 h
Riverside
Mean (SD): 32.78(21.84)
50th(Median): 28.14
Range (Min, Max): 7.27, 98.43
Whittier
Mean (SD): 36.2 (25.46) 50th(Median):
29.07
Range (Min, Max): 7.55,197.05
Personal Exposure
Averaging Time: 1 h
Riverside
Mean (SD): 97.94 (70.29) 50th(Median):
PM Increment: IQR increase (Riverside:
28.41 /yglm3, Whittier 21.87 /yglm3)
Coefficient [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Mixed-model estimates of the association
between personal and central-site air
pollutant exposure and FEN0
Lag 0
Personal 0.42 (-0.15, 0.99)
Central 0.03 (-0.68, 0.74)
Lag 1
Personal 0.51 (-0.10,1.12)
Central 0.44 (-0.28,1.16)
2-day MA
Personal 1.01 (0.14,1.88)
July 2009
E-204
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
needed B-agonist inhalers
Dose-response Investigated? No
Lags Considered: 0,1, 2, MA day
83.7
Range (Min, Max): 14.9, 431.8
Whittier
Mean (SD): 93.63 (75.19) 50th(Median):
71.95
Range (Min, Max): 5.8, 572.9
Personal Exposure
Averaging Time: 8 h
Riverside
Mean (SD): 47.21 (30.9) 50th(Median):
38.5
Range (Min, Max): 8.9,132.1
Whittier
Mean (SD): 51.75 (36.88) 50th(Median):
40.15
Range (Min, Max): 8.7, 254.1
Central Site
Averaging Time: 24 h
Riverside
Mean (SD): 36.63 (23.46) 50th(Median):
29.26
Range (Min, Max): (9.52, 87.22)
Whittier
Mean (SD): 18 (12.14) 50th(Median):
16.3
Range (Min, Max): 2.7, 77.09
Monitoring Stations: 48 personal
nephelometers
2 central sites
Copollutant (correlation):
Personal
24-h personal PM2.61.00
24-h personal EC 0.18
24-h personal 0C 0.15
24-h personal NO2 0.33
24-h central PM2.6 0.64
24-h central EC 0.12
24-h central 0C 0.21
24-h central NO2 0.22
Central
24-h personal PM2.6 0.64
24-h personal EC 0.00
24-h personal 0C -0.11
24-h personal NO2 0.12
24-h central PM2.61.00
24-h central EC 0.55
24-h central 0C 0.66
24-h central NO2 0.25
Central 0.52 (-0.43,1.47)
Stratified by Medication Use
Lag - 2-day moving avg
Not Taking Anti-lnflamm. Medication
Personal 1.11 (-1.39,3.60)
Central 0.44 (-1.65,2.53)
Taking Anti-lnflamm. Medication
Personal 1.01 (0.19,1.84)
Central 0.55 (-0.47,1.57)
Inhaled Corticosteroids
Personal 1.58(0.72, 2.43)
Central 1.16 (0.11, 2.20)
Antileukotrienes +- inhaled
corticosteroids
Personal -0.89 (-2.73, 0.95)
Central-0.75 (-2.83,1.32)
Notes:
Figure of Estimated lag effect of hourly
personal PM2.6 on FEN0.
Figure of the Estimated lag effect of
hourly personal PM2.6 on FEN0 by use of
medications.
Figure of One- and two-pollutant models
for change in FEN0 using 2-day Moving
Averages personal and central-site
pollutant measurements.
July 2009
E-205
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Delfino et al. (2006, 090745) Outcome: Fractional Concentration of
Nitric Oxide in exhaled air (FENO)
Period of Study: Region 1: August to
Mid December 2003. Region 2: July
through November 2004
Location: Region 1: Riverside, CA.
Region 2: Whittier, CA
Age Groups: 9 through 18
Study Design: Longitudinal Panel Study
N: 45 children
Statistical Analyses: Linear mixed-
effects models
Two-stage hierarchical model
Empirical Variograms
Fourth-order polynomial distributed lag
mixed-effects model
Covariates: Personal temperature,
personal rel. humid., 10-day exposure run,
respiratory infections, region of study,
sex, cumulative daily use of as-needed B-
agonist inhalers
Dose-response Investigated? No
Lags Considered: Lag 0, Lag 1, 2-day
moving avg
Pollutant: PM2.6
PM Component: Elemental carbon
Personal Exposure
Averaging Time: 24 h
Riverside
Mean (SD): 0.42 (0.69) 50th(Median):
0.34/yg/m3
Range (Min, Max): 0.01, 6.94
Whittier
Mean (SD): 0.78(1.42)
50th(Median): 0.47
Range (Min, Max): 0,17.2
Central Site
Averaging Time: 24 h
Riverside
Mean (SD): 1.61 (0.78) 50th(Median):
1.35
Range (Min, Max): 0.52, 3.64
Whittier
Mean (SD): 0.71 (0.43) 50th(Median):
0.63
Range (Min, Max): 0.14, 2.95
Monitoring Stations: 48 personal
nephelometers,
2 central sites
Copollutant (correlation):
Personal
24-h personal PM2.6 0.18
24-h personal EC 1.00
24-h personal 0C 0.41
24-h personal NO2 0.0.21
24-h central PM2.6 0.00
24-h central EC 0.04
24-h central 0C -0.01
24-h central NO2 0.23
Central
24-h personal PM2.6 0.12
24-h personal EC 0.04
24-h personal 0C 0.03
24-h personal NO2 0.19
24-h central PM2.6 0.55
24-h central EC 1.00
24-h central 0C 0.87
24-h central NO2 0.70
PM Increment: IQR increase (Riverside:
28.41 /yglm3, Whittier 21.87 /yg/m3)
Coefficient [Lower CI, Upper CI]
Mixed-model estimates of the association
between personal and central-site air
pollutant exposure and FENO
Lag 0
Personal 0.29 (0.10, 0.48)
Central 0.10 (-0.65, 0.85)
Lag 1
Personal-0.01 (-0.23,0.21)
Central 0.99 (0.27,1.71)
2-day MA
Personal 0.72(0.32,1.12)
Central 1.38(0.15, 2.61)
Stratified by Medication Use
Lag - 2-day moving avg
Not Taking Anti-lnflamm. Medication
Personal 0.84 (0.08,1.60)
Central 1.02 (-2.55,4.60)
Taking Anti-lnflamm. Medication
Personal 0.71 (0.28,1.15)
Central 1.42 (0.25, 2.60)
Inhaled Corticosteroids
Personal 0.67(0.28,1.07)
Central 1.28(0.07, 2.49)
Antileukotrienes +- inhaled
corticosteroids
Personal 0.03 (-3.29, 3.35)
Central 1.15 (-1.58, 3.88)
Notes:
Figure of Estimated lag effect of hourly
personal PM2.6 on FENO.
Figure of the Estimated lag effect of
hourly personal PM2.6 on FENO by use of
medications.
Figure of One- and two-pollutant models
for change in FENO using 2-day Moving
Averages personal and central-site
pollutant measurements.
Reference: Delfino et al. (2006, 090745) Outcome: Fractional Concentration of
Nitric Oxide in exhaled air (FENO)
Period of Study: Region 1: August to
Mid December 2003. Region 2: July Age Groups: 9 through 18
Pollutant: PM2.6
PM Component: Organic carbon
Personal Exposure
PM Increment: IQR increase (Riverside:
28.41 /yglm3, Whittier 21.87 /yglm3)
Mixed-model estimates of the association
between personal and central-site air
July 2009
E-206
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
through November 2004
Location: Region 1: Riverside, CA.
Region 2: Whittier, CA
Study Design: Longitudinal Panel Study
N: 45 children
Statistical Analyses: Linear mixed-
effects models
Two-stage hierarchical model
Empirical Variograms
Fourth-order polynomial distributed lag
mixed-effects model
Covariates: Personal temperature,
personal rel. humid., 10-day exposure run,
respiratory infections, region of study,
sex, cumulative daily use of as-needed B-
agonist inhalers
Dose-response Investigated? No
Lags Considered: Lag 0, Lag 1, 2-day
moving avg
Averaging Time: 24 h
Riverside
Mean |SD): 5.63 (2.59) 50th(Median):
4.98
Range (Min, Max): 1.94,12.38
Whittier
Mean (SD): 6.81 (3.45) 50th(Median):
6.43
Range (Min, Max): 2.18, 31.5
Central Site
Averaging Time: 24 h
Riverside
Mean (SD): 6.88(1.86)
Percentiles: 50th
Median: 6.07
Range (Min, Max): 4.11,11.62
Whittier
Mean (SD): 3.93 (1.49) 50th(Median):
3.76
Range (Min, Max): 1.64, 8.82
Monitoring Stations: 48 personal
nephelometers,
2 central sites
Copollutant (correlation):
Personal
24-h personal PM2.6 0.15
24-h personal EC 0.41
24-h personal 0C 1.00
24-h personal NO2 0.20
24-h central PM2.6 -0.11
24-h central EC 0.03
24-h central 0C -0.02
24-h central NO2 0.21
Central
24-h personal PM2.6 0.21
24-h personal EC -0.01
24-h personal 0C -0.02
24-h personal NO2 0.17
24-h central PM2.6 0.66
24-h central EC 0.87
24-h central 0C 1.00
24-h central NO2 0.62
pollutant exposure and FEN0
Lag 0
Personal 0.51 (-0.28,1.30)
Central 0.93 (-0.20, 2.06)
Lag 1
Personal 0.13 (-0.77,1.03)
Central0.51 (-0.64,1.66)
2-day MA
Personal 0.94 (-0.47, 2.35)
Central 1.6 (-0.17, 3.37)
Stratified by Medication Use
Lag - 2-day moving avg.
Not Taking Anti-lnflamm. Medication
Personal 0.88 (-1.62, 3.38)
Central 0.36 (-4.07,4.79)
Taking Anti-lnflamm. Medication
Personal 0.87 (-0.79, 2.53)
Central 2.05 (0.24, 3.86)
Inhaled Corticosteroids
Personal 2.47 (0.30, 4.64)
Central 1.96 (0.14, 3.78)
Antileukotrienes +- inhaled
corticosteroids
Personal 0.52 (-1.99, 3.02)
Central 1.29 (-2.58, 5.15)
Notes:
Figure of Estimated lag effect of hourly
personal PM2.6 on FEN0.
Figure of the Estimated lag effect of
hourly personal PM2.6 on FEN0 by use of
medications.
Figure of One- and two-pollutant models
for change in FEN0 using 2-day Moving
Averages personal and central-site
pollutant measurements
Reference: Dubowsky et al (2006,
088750)
Period of Study: 3/2002-6/2002
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Outcome: Chronic inflammation,
Diabetes, Obesity, Hypertension, Cardiac
Risk
Study Design:
Prospective Cohort
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD) unit: 16 (6.0)
Range (Min, Max): 6.5, 28
Copollutants:
Increment: 5.4/yg/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
Lag
% increase in inflammatory response and
exposure to PM2.6 in people a 60
July 2009
E-207
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Statistical Analyses:
BC
Inflammatory Marker:
Poisson, LOESS
CO
IL-6: -8 (-16, 8)
Age Groups:
NO?
1: -6 (-10, 5)
> 60
SO?
2: -5 (-11, 6)
Os
3: -3 (-9, 6)
4: -4 (-12,10)
5: -5 (-13, 8)
6:-6 (-14, 9)
7
CRP: -2 (-22,15)
1: 3 (-8,17)
2: 4 (-9, 20)
3: 9 (-4, 27)
4: 11 (-5, 35)
5: 8 (-9, 29)
6: 5 (-12, 26)
7
WBC: 0 (-2, 4)
1: 1 (-1,2)
2:2(-1,3)
3: 1 (-2, 5)
4: 3 (-1,10)
5: 5(0,12)
6: 8(0,14)
7
% Increase in inflammatory responses
and exposure to ambient PM2.6
concentrations in people a 60
Inflammatory Marker:
CRP
All conditions*: 14 (-5.4, 37)
0-5 avg
3 conditions met*: 81 (21,172)
0-5 avg
2 conditions met*: 11 (-7.3, 33)
0-5 avg
IL-6
All conditions*: -2.1 (-13,11)
0-5 avg
3 conditions met*: 23 (-5.3, 59)
0-5 avg
2 conditions met*: -3.1 (-14, 9.7)
0-5 avg
WBC
All conditions*: 3.4 (-1.8, 8.9)
0-5 avg
July 2009
E-208
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
3 conditions met*: 0.4 (-8.8,11)
0-5 avg
2 conditions met*: 3.6 (-1.7, 9.1)
0-5 avg
* All conditions met means model is
adjusted for sex, obesity, diabetes,
smoking history, ambient and
microenvironmental apparent
temperature, mold, pollen, trip, h, and
vitamins.
Three conditions met means model is
adjusted for three of the variables.
Two conditions met means model is
adjusted for two of the variables.
Reference: Ebelt et al. (2005, 056907)
Period of Study: Summer of 1998
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Outcome: spirometry,
Age Groups: range from 54-86 yrs
mean age - 74 years
Study Design: extended analysis of a
repeated-measures panel study
N: 16 persons with COPD
Statistical Analyses: Earlier analysis
expanded by developing mixed-effect
regression models and by evaluating
additional exposure indicators
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS V8
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD):
Ambient PM2.6:11.4 (4.6)
Exposure to ambient PM2.6: 7.9 (3.7)
Nonsulfate ambient PM2.6: 9.3 (3.7)
Exposure to nonsulfate ambient PM2.6:
6.5 (3.0)
Total exposure to PM2.6: 18.5 (14.9)
Exposure to nonambient PM2.6:10.6
(14.5)
Range (Min, Max):
Ambient PM2.6: (4.2-28.7)
Exposure to ambient PM2.6: (0.9-21.3)
Nonsulfate ambient PM2.6: (3.3-23.3)
Exposure to nonsulfate ambient PM2.6:
(0.7-16.9)
Total exposure to PM2.6: (2.2-90.9)
Exposure to nonambient PM2.6: (-2.6-
85.0)
Monitoring Stations: 5
Copollutant (correlation):
Ambient PM10: r- 0.78
Ambient PMio-2.b: r- 0.15
Ambient Sulfate- 0.82
Nonsufate Ambient PM2.6: r- 0.98
PM Increment: Ambient PM2.6: 5.8 (IQR)
Exposure to ambient PM2.6: 4.4 (IQR)
Nonsulfate ambient PM2.6: 4.2 (IQR)
Exposure to nonsulfate ambient PM2.6:
3.4 (IQR)
Total exposure to PM2.6: 10.1 (IQR)
Exposure to nonambient PM2.6: 8.9 (IQR)
Notes: Effect estimates are presented in
Figure 2 and Electronic Appendix Table 1
(only available with electronic version of
article) and not provided quantitatively
elsewhere.
Reference: Ebelt et al. (2005, 056907) Outcome: spirometry
Period of Study: Summer of 1998
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Age Groups: Range from 54-86 yrs
mean age - 74 years
Study Design: extended analysis of a
repeated-measures panel study
N: 16 persons with COPD
Statistical Analyses: Earlier analysis
expanded by developing mixed-effect
regression models and by evaluating
additional exposure indicators
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: Sulfate (SO4)
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD):
Ambient Sulfate: 2.0 (1.1)
Exposure to Ambient Sulfate: 0.2 (4.7)
Range (Min, Max):
Ambient Sulfate: (0.4-5.4)
Exposure to ambient Sulfate: (0.2-4.7)
Monitoring Stations: 5
Copollutant (correlation):
PM Increment: Ambient Sulfate: 1.5
(IQR)
Exposure to Ambient Sulfate: 0.9 (IQR)
Notes: Effect estimates are presented in
Figure 2 and Electronic Appendix Table 1
(only available with electronic version of
article) and not provided quantitatively
elsewhere.
July 2009
E-209
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Statistical Package: SAS V8
Ambient PM2.6: r- 0.82
Nonsulfate Ambient PM2.6: r- 0.74
Exposure to Ambient Sulfate: r- 0.82
Reference: Ferdinands et al. (2008,
Outcome: Respiratory Symptoms, airway
Pollutant: PM2.6
The study presents results qualitatively
156433)
inflammation
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
not quantitatively.
Period of Study: 8/16/2004-8/31/2004
Study Design: Prospective cohort
Mean (SD) unit: 27.2 (11.9)
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Statistical Analyses: Pearson
Range (Min, Max): 21.7, 34.7
Correlation Analysis
Age Groups: 14-18
Copollutants (correlation):
O3: r- 0.8-0.9
Reference: Gent et al. (2003, 052885)
Outcome: Respiratory symptoms
Pollutant: PM2.6
PM Increment: 12 /yg/m3 same day
including: Wheeze, persistent cough,
19/yg/m3 previous day
Period of Study: April 1 through
chest tightness, shortness of breath
Averaging Time: 24 h
September 30, 2001
Age Groups: Infants
Mean (SD): 13.1 (7.9)
Model 5 (same day)
Location: Connecticut
Springfield, MA
Study Design: 1 -year prospective cohort
Percentiles: 20th: 6.9
Wheeze <6.9 - 1.00
study
40th: 9.0
6.9-8.9 - 0.95 (0.83,1.10)
N: 1002 infants
50th(Median): 10.3
9.0-12.0 - 1.04 (0.89,1.20)
17160 observations
60th: 12.1
12.1-18.9 - 1.05(0.92,1.20)
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
80th: 19.0
> 19.0 - 0.93(0.78,1.11)
regression analysis
GEEs
Range (Min, Max): 3.7, 44.2
Persistent Cough <6.9 — 1.00
Tests for linear trend
Monitoring Stations: 4 sites
6.9-8.9 - 0.95 (0.87,1.04)
Test for goodness of fit
Copollutant (correlation):
9.0-12.0 - 0.96 (0.87,1.06)
Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic for
Temperature: 0.58
12.1-18.9 - 1.00(0.91,1.09)
regression
> 19.0 - 0.95(0.83,1.09)
Covariates: Temperature
Chest Tightness <6.9 - 1.00
Dose-response Investigated? No
6.9-8.9 - 1.01 (0.86,1.19)
Statistical Package: SAS
9.0-12.0 - 1.06 (0.89,1.26)
Lags Considered: 1-day lag
12.1-18.9 - 1.24(1.06,1.45)
> 19.0 - 1.05(0.84,1.33)
Shortness of Breath < 6.9 - 1.00
6.9-8.9 - 1.01 (0.87,1.17)
9.0-12.0 - 1.03 (0.87,1.22)
12.1-18.9 - 1.07 (0.91,1.25)
> 19.0 - 1.03(0.83,1.28)
Bronchodilator <6.9 - 1.00
6.9-8.9 - 1.04 (0.99,1.09)
9.0-12.0 - 1.02 (0.96,1.08)
12.1-18.9 - 1.04(0.99,1.09)
> 19.0 - 1.02(0.97,1.08)
Model 6 (previous day)
Wheeze <6.9 - 1.00
6.9-8.9 - 1.06 (0.95,1.20)
9.0-12.0 - 1.09 (0.94,1.28)
12.1-18.9 - 1.03(0.89,1.19)
> 19.0 - 1.14(0.97,1.34)
Persistent Cough <6.9 — 1.00
6.9-8.9 - 1.04 (0.94,1.14)
July 2009
E-210
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
9.0-12.0 - 1.05 (0.94,1.17)
12.1-18.9 - 1.03(0.94,1.14)
> 19.0 - 1.12(1.02 1.24)
Chest Tightness <6.9 - 1.00
6.9-8.9 - 1.03 (0.87,1.23)
9.0-12.0 - 1.04 (0.85,1.27)
12.1-18.9 - 1.00(0.84,1.19)
> 19.0 - 1.21 (1.00,1.46)
Shortness of Breath <6.9 - 1.00
6.9-8.9 - 1.00 (0.84,1.19)
9.0-12.0 - 1.09 (0.90,1.31)
12.1-18.9 - 1.09(0.90,1.31)
> 19.0 - 1.26(1.02,1.54)
Bronchodilator <6.9 - 1.00
6.9-8.9 - 0.98 (0.94,1.03)
9.0-12.0 - 0.99 (0.95,1.03)
12.1-18.9 - 0.97 (0.94,1.01)
> 19.0 - 0.99(0.95,1.04)
PM2.5 + O3: Medication Users: Same-
day
Wheeze < 6.9 - 1.00
6.9-8.9 - 0.89 (0.75,1.29)
9.0-12.0 - 1.02 (0.87,1.19)
12.1-18.9 - 0.94 (0.77,1.15)
> 19.0 - 0.83(0.65,1.06)
Persistent Cough <6.9 - 1.00
6.9-8.9 - 0.95 (0.84,1.06)
9.0-12.0 - 0.97 (0.86,1.10)
12.1-18.9 - 0.94 (0.77,1.15)
> 19.0 - 0.83(0.65,1.06)
Chest Tightness <6.9 - 1.00
6.9-8.9 - 0.90 (0.74,1.09)
9.0-12.0 - 0.97 (0.79,1.18)
12.1-18.9 - 0.97 (0.76,1.25)
> 19.0 - 0.76(0.54,1.05)
Shortness of Breath <6.9 - 1.00
6.9-8.9 - 0.95 (0.80,1.12)
9.0-12.0 - 1.00 (0.82,1.21)
12.1-18.9 - 0.90(0.73,1.12)
> 19.0 - 0.87(0.65,1.17)
Bronchodilator <6.9 - 1.00
6.9-8.9 - 1.03 (0.98,1.08)
9.0-12.0 - 1.01 (0.96,1.07)
12.1-18.9 - 1.02(0.95,1.08)
> 19.0 - 0.99(0.91,1.07)
July 2009
E-211
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Previous Day
Wheeze < 6.9 - 1.00
6.9-8.9 - 1.03 (0.89,1.18)
9.0-12.0 - 1.05 (0.88,1.24)
12.1-18.9 - 0.98(0.82,1.17)
> 19.0 - 1.05(0.85,1.29)
Persistent Cough <6.9 - 1.00
6.9-8.9 - 0.99 (0.89,1.11)
9.0-12.0 - 0.98 (0.86,1.10)
12.1-18.9 - 0.95(0.83,1.10)
> 19.0 - 1.00(0.88,1.15)
Chest Tightness <6.9 - 1.00
6.9-8.9 - 0.89 (0.72,1.10)
9.0-12.0 - 0.90 (0.70,1.16)
12.1-18.9 - 0.81 (0.63,1.03)
>19.0 - 0.91 (0.71,1.17)
Shortness of Breath <6.9 - 1.00
6.9-8.9 - 0.96 (0.78,1.18)
9.0-12.0 - 1.00 (0.81,1.25)
12.1-18.9 - 0.96(0.74,1.24)
> 19.0 - 1.20(0.94,1.52)
Bronchodilator <6.9 - 1.00
6.9-8.9 - 0.99 (0.94,1.04)
9.0-12.0 - 0.97 (0.93,1.02)
12.1-18.9 - 0.96(0.91,1.02)
> 19.0 - 0.97(0.89,1.04)
PM2.5 + O3: Non-users: Same-day
Wheeze < 6.9 - 1.00
6.9-8.9 - 0.92 (0.72,1.17)
9.0-12.0 - 1.08 (0.85,1.36)
12.1-18.9 - 0.94 (0.73,1.22)
> 19.0 - 1.15(0.75,1.75)
Persistent Cough <6.9 - 1.00
6.9-8.9 - 0.96 (0.83,1.12)
9.0-12.0 - 1.02 (0.89,1.18)
12.1-18.9 - 0.93(0.78,1.12)
> 19.0 - 1.07(0.85,1.34)
Chest Tightness <6.9 - 1.00
6.9-8.9 - 0.84 (0.54,1.31)
9.0-12.0 - 1.09 (0.74,1.61)
12.1-18.9 - 0.78(0.47,1.30)
> 19.0 - 0.71 (0.36,1.39)
Shortness of Breath < 6.9 - 1.00
6.9-8.9 - 0.61 (0.39,0.95)
9.0-12.0 - 1.13(0.85,1.50)
July 2009
E-212
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
12.1-18.9 - 0.72(0.42,1.23)
> 19.0 - 1.17(0.72,1.90)
Bronchodilator Use: <6.9 - 1.00
6.9-8.9 - 0.95 (0.78,1.15)
9.0-12.0 - 0.95 (0.78,1.16)
12.1-18.9 - 0.85(0.69,1.06)
> 19.0 - 0.99(0.76,1.30)
Previous-day
Wheeze < 6.9 - 1.00
6.9-8.9 - 1.01 (0.78,1.31)
9.0-12.0 - 1.15(0.88,1.51)
12.1-18.9 - 1.08(0.78,1.51)
>19.0 - 1.18(0.71,1.97)
Persistent Cough <6.9 - 1.00
6.9-8.9 - 1.07 (0.94,1.22)
9.0-12.0 - 1.13(0.97,1.32)
12.1-18.9 - 1.03(0.87,1.22)
> 19.0 - 1.14(0.88,1.46)
Chest Tightness <6.9 - 1.00
6.9-8.9 - 1.44(0.90,2.30)
9.0-12.0 - 1.50 (0.97, 2.33)
12.1-18.9 - 1.56(0.91,2.66)
> 19.0 - 1.76(0.83, 3.73)
Shortness of Breath < 6.9 - 1.00
6.9-8.9 - 0.99 (0.75,1.30)
9.0-12.0 - 1.30 (0.88,1.91)
12.1-18.9 - 0.84 (0.57,1.24)
> 19.0 - 1.48(0.94,2.34)
Bronchodilator Use <6.9 - 1.00
6.9-8.9 - 1.05 (0.85,1.34)
9.0-12.0 - 1.28(1.01,1.62)
12.1-18.9 - 1.05(0.80,1.37)
>19.0 - 1.19(0.83,1.71)
Notes: Line graphs of daily levels of
ozone and PM2.6 and daily temperature
with daily prevalence of respiratory
symptoms for users of asthma
maintenance medication
Reference: Gent et al, (2009,180399)
Period of Study: 2000-2003
Location: New Haven County CT
Outcome: Increased asthma symptoms
and medication use
Study Design: Panel
Covariates: Season, day of the week,
date
Statistical Analysis: Logistic regression
Statistical Package: SAS
Age Groups: Children aged 4-12
Pollutant: PM2 Eand components
Averaging Time: Daily
Mean: (estimated sources, /yg/m3)
Motor Vehicle: 6.6
Road Dust: 2.3
Sulfur: 5.5
Biomass Burning: 0.9
Oil: 0.8
Sea Salt: 0.5
Odds Patio and p-value for sources
and components of PM2.5. Lags are 0,
1 or 2 days, and the mean of days 0-2
(L02).
Source: Motor Vehicle
Elemental Carbon, Increment = 1QQQ
ng/tri3
Wheeze
L0: 1.04, p - 0.04
L1: 1.01, p - 0.70
July 2009
E-213
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Range (Min, Max): NR L2: 1.00, p - 0.99
Copollutant (correlation): NR L02: 1.07, p - 0.06
Persistent Cough
L0: 1.01, p - 0.42
L1: 1.01, p - 0.38
L2: 0.99, p - 0.44
L02: 1.03, p - 0.23
Shortness of Breath
L0: 1.06, p - 0.001
L1: 1.01, p - 0.65
L2: 1.01, p - 0.63
L02: 1.12, p - 0.01
Chest Tightness
L0: 1.03, p - 0.20
L1: 1.02, p - 0.24
L2: 1.01, p - 0.59
L02: 1.10, p - 0.04
Inhaler Use
L0: 1.01, p - 0.15
L1: 1.00, p - 0.72
L2: 1.00, p - 0.75
L02: 1.02, p - 0.40
Zn, Increment = 10 ng/ni3
Wheeze
L0: 1.00, p - 0.69
L1: 0.99, p - 0.54
L2: 1.00, p - 0.89
L02: 1.00, p - 0.98
Persistent Cough
L0: 1.00, p - 0.60
L1: 1.00, p - 0.77
L2: 0.99, p - 0.24
L02: 1.00, p - 0.94
Shortness of Breath
L0: 1.02, p - 0.001
L1: 1.00, p - 0.57
L2: 1.01, p - 0.49
L02: 1.04, p - 0.06
Chest Tightness
L0: 1.00, p - 0.72
L1: 1.00, p - 0.96
L2: 1.01, p - 0.38
L02: 1.03, p - 0.13
Inhaler Use
L0: 1.00, p - 0.41
July 2009
E-214
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
L1: 1.00, p - 0.44
L2: 1.00, p - 0.52
L02: 1.01, p - 0.53
Pb, Increment = 5 ng/nf
Wheeze
L0: 1.02, p - 0.31
L1: 1.00, p - 0.91
L2: 1.01, p - 0.62
L02: 1.07, p - 0.13
Persistent Cough
L0: 1.02, p - 0.25
L1: 1.00, p - 0.88
L2: 1.00, p - 0.87
L02: 1.05, p - 0.12
Shortness of Breath
L0: 1.03, p - 0.11
L1: 0.98, p - 0.51
L2: 1.03, p - 0.05
L02: 1.12, p - 0.01
Chest Tightness
L0: 1.02, p - 0.31
L1: 0.99, p - 0.79
L2: 1.03, p - 0.13
L02: 1.10, p - 0.02
Inhaler Use
L0: 1.01, p - 0.06
L1: 0.98, p - 0.11
L2: 1.02, p - 0.04
L02: 1.04, p - 0.10
Cu, Increment = 5 ng/nf
Wheeze
L0: 1.01, p - 0.59
L1: 0.99, p - 0.55
L2: 0.99, p - 0.82
L02: 1.02, p - 0.67
Persistent Cough
L0: 1.02, p - 0.13
L1: 1.02, p - 0.21
L2: 0.98, p - 0.26
L02: 1.05, p - 0.04
Shortness of Breath
L0: 1.06, p - 0.01
L1: 1.01, p - 0.74
L2: 0.96, p - 0.10
L02: 1.06, p - 0.21
July 2009
E-215
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Chest Tightness
LO: 10.3, p - 0.23
L1: 1.02, p - 0.42
L2: 0.97, p - 0.17
L02: 1.04, p - 0.39
Inhaler Use
LO: 1.01, p - 0.22
L1: 0.99, p - 0.37
L2: 1.00, p - 0.70
L02: 1.01, p - 0.46
Se, Increment = 7 ng/ni3
Wheeze
L0: 1.00, p - 0.97
L1: 0.99, p - 0.52
L2: 1.00, p - 0.91
L02: 1.02, p - 0.71
Persistent Cough
L0: 1.00, p - 0.84
L1: 0.99, p - 0.32
L2: 1.00, p - 0.93
L02: 0.98, p - 0.43
Shortness of Breath
L0: 1.02, p - 0.40
L1: 0.97, p - 0.10
L2: 1.01, p - 0.55
L02: 1.02, p - 0.67
Chest Tightness
LO: 1.00, p - 0.79
L1: 0.97, p - 0.13
L2: 1.01, p - 0.72
L02: 0.98, p - 0.61
Inhaler Use
LO: 0.99, p - 0.20
L1: 1.01, p - 0.02
L2: 0.99, p - 0.32
L02: 0.99, p - 0.75
Source: Road Dust
Si, Increment = lOOng/rri3
Wheeze
LO: 1.03, p - 0.03
L1: 1.00, p - 0.99
L2: 1.02, p - 0.26
L02: 1.07, p - 0.04
Persistent Cough
LO: 1.02, p - 0.01
July 2009
E-216
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
L1: 1.00, p - 0.78
L2: 1.01, p - 0.60
L02: 1.05, p - 0.02
Shortness of Breatl .04, p - 0.01 h
L0: 1.04, p - 0.01
L1: 1.01, p - 0.60
L2: 1.01, p - 0.63
L02: 1.08, p - 0.02
Chest Tightness
LO: 1.02, p - 0.20
L1: 1.02, p - 0.17
L2: 1.00, p - 0.88
L02: 1.06, p - 0.10
Inhaler Use
LO: 1.02, p - 0.004
L1: 0.99, p - 0.18
L2: 1.01, p - 0.45
L02: 1.03, p - 0.09
fe, Increment = 100 ng/nf
Wheeze
L0: 1.04, p - 0.02
L1: 1.00, p - 0.80
L2: 1.00, p - 0.87
L02: 1.07, p - 0.05
Persistent Cough
L0: 1.02, p - 0.06
L1: 1.01, p - 0.52
L2: 0.99, p - 0.52
L02: 1.04, p - 0.04
Shortness of Breath
L0: 1.06, p - 0.002
L1: 1.01, p - 0.65
L2: 0.98, p - 0.27
L02: 1.08, p - 0.04
Chest Tightness
LO: 1.01, p - 0.47
L1: 1.02, p - 0.22
L2: 0.98, p - 0.35
L02: 1.05, p - 0.21
Inhaler Use
LO: 1.02, p - 0.004
L1: 0.99, p - 0.44
L2: 1.00, p - 0.91
L02: 1.03, p - 0.08
At, Increment = 50 ng/m3
July 2009
E-217
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Wheeze
LO: 1.02, p - 0.17
L1: 1.01, p - 0.73
L2: 1.02, p - 0.30
L02: 1.07, p - 0.03
Persistent Cough
L0: 1.03, p - 0.001
L1: 1.00, p - 0.96
L2: 1.00, p - 0.68
L02: 1.06, p - 0.01
Shortness of Breath
LO: 1.05, p - 0.002
L1: 1.01, p - 0.63
L2: 1.01, p - 0.59
L02: 1.09, p - 0.004
Chest Tightness
LO: 1.02, p - 0.21
L1: 1.02, p - 0.18
L2: 1.00, p - 0.94
L02: 1.07, p - 0.04
Inhaler Use
LO: 1.02, p - 0.02
L1: 0.99, p - 0.27
L2: 1.01, p - 0.50
L02: 1.02, p - 0.11
Ca, Increment = 50 ng/m3
Wheeze
L0: 1.07, p - 0.02
L1: 1.00, p - 0.97
L2: 1.01, p - 0.74
L02: 1.14, p - 0.04
Persistent Cough
L0: 1.05, p - 0.01
L1: 0.99, p - 0.64
L2: 1.00, p - 0.90
L02: 1.09, p - 0.03
Shortness of Breath
LO: 1.10, p - 0.002
L1: 1.02, p - 0.66
L2: 1.00, p - 0.89
L02: 1.18, p - 0.01
Chest Tightness
LO: 1.04, p - 0.26
L1: 1.03, p - 0.43
L2: 1.00, p - 0.93
July 2009
E-218
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
L02: 1.14, p - 0.07
Inhaler Use
L0: 1.04, p - 0.01
L1: 0.97, p - 0.06
L2: 1.01, p - 0.44
L02: 1.04, p - 0.17
Ba, Increment = Wng/m3
Wheeze
L0: 0.99, p - 0.57
L1: 1.00, p - 0.92
L2: 0.99, p - 0.48
L02: 0.99, p - 0.81
Persistent Cough
L0: 1.00, p - 0.83
L1: 1.01, p - 0.38
L2: 0.99, p - 0.32
L02: 1.00, p - 0.81
Shortness of Breath
L0: 1.04, p - 0.02
L1: 1.00, p - 0.96
L2: 0.96, p - 0.05
L02: 1.03, p - 0.38
Chest Tightness
L0: 1.01, p - 0.63
L1: 1.00, p - 0.88
L2: 0.98, p - 0.30
L02: 1.02, p - 0.51
Inhaler Use
L0: 1.01, p - 0.08
L1: 0.99, p - 0.19
L2: 1.00, p - 0.92
L02: 1.01, p - 0.36
Ti, Increment = 5 ng/m3
Wheeze
L0: 1.00, p - 0.59
L1: 0.99, p - 0.49
L2: 1.01, p - 0.34
L02: 1.01, p - 0.56
Persistent Cough
L0: 1.00, p - 0.57
L1: 1.00, p - 0.55
L2: 1.00, p - 0.30
L02: 1.01, p - 0.29
Shortness of Breath
L0: 1.01, p - 0.01
July 2009
E-219
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
L1: 1.00, p - 0.56
L2: 1.00, p - 0.60
L02: 1.03, p - 0.05
Chest Tightness
L0: 1.00, p - 0.34
L1: 1.00, p - 0.55
L2: 0.99, p - 0.49
L02: 1.01, p - 0.52
Inhaler Use
LO: 1.00, p - 0.72
L1: 1.00, p - 0.30
L2: 1.00, p - 0.67
L02: 1.00, p - 0.66
Source: Sulfur
S, Increment = lOOOngltr?
Wheeze
L0: 0.98, p - 0.43
L1: 0.99, p - 0.62
L2: 1.02, p - 0.29
L02: 1.00, p - 0.99
Persistent Cough
LO: 1.00, p - 0.84
L1: 1.00, p - 0.69
L2: 1.02, p - 0.21
L02: 1.02, p - 0.27
Shortness of Breath
LO: 1.01, p - 0.63
L1: 0.99, p - 0.71
L2: 1.01, p - 0.55
L02: 1.01, p - 0.79
Chest Tightness
LO: 0.99, p - 0.80
L1: 1.01, p - 0.62
L2: 1.01, p - 0.81
L02: 1.02, p - 0.68
Inhaler Use
LO: 0.99, p - 0.13
L1: 1.00, p - 0.81
L2: 1.02, p - 0.04
L02: 1.00, p - 0.81
P, Increment = 50 ng/rri3
Wheeze
LO: 0.98, p - 0.39
L1: 0.98, p - 0.48
L2: 1.02, p - 0.38
July 2009
E-220
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
L02: 0.99, p - 0.89
Persistent Cough
L0: 1.00, p - 0.75
L1: 0.99, p - 0.69
L2: 1.01, p - 0.38
L02: 1.03, p - 0.30
Shortness of Breath
L0: 1.01, p - 0.61
L1: 0.99, p - 0.71
L2: 1.01, p - 0.67
L02: 1.01, p - 0.78
Chest Tightness
LO: 1.00, p - 0.88
L1: 1.01, p - 0.72
L2: 1.00, p - 0.87
L02: 1.02, p - 0.67
Inhaler Use
LO: 0.98, p - 0.15
L1: 1.00, p - 0.83
L2: 1.01, p - 0.11
L02: 1.00, p - 0.99
Source: Biomass Burning
K, Increment = 50 ng/ni3
Wheeze
LO: 0.98, p - 0.06
L1: 0.99, p - 0.43
L2: 1.00, p - 0.85
L02: 0.96, p - 0.04
Persistent Cough
LO: 1.00, p - 0.64
L1: 1.00, p - 0.83
L2: 1.00, p - 0.46
L02: 1.00, p - 0.86
Shortness of Breath
LO: 1.01, p - 0.01
L1: 0.98, p - 0.09
L2: 1.00, p - 0.38
L02: 1.00, p - 0.79
Chest Tightness
LO: 1.00, p - 0.02
L1: 0.99, p - 0.24
L2: 0.98, p - 0.07
L02: 0.99, p - 0.67
Inhaler Use
LO: 1.00, p - 0.68
July 2009
E-221
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
L1: 0.99, p - 0.05
L2: 1.00, p - 0.59
L02: 0.99, p - 0.28
Source: Oil
V, Increment = lOng/ni3
Wheeze
L0: 0.99, p - 0.73
L1: 0.96, p - 0.03
L2: 0.99, p - 0.56
L02: 0.93, p - 0.04
Persistent Cough
L0: 1.01, p - 0.56
L1: 0.99, p - 0.24
L2: 0.98, p - 0.01
L02: 0.96, p - 0.05
Shortness of Breath
L0: 1.01, p - 0.46
L1: 0.98, p - 0.24
L2: 1.00, p - 0.83
L02: 0.98, p - 0.58
Chest Tightness
LO: 0.99, p - 0.71
L1: 0.98, p - 0.32
L2: 0.98, p - 0.23
L02: 0.94, p - 0.12
Inhaler Use
LO: 0.98, p - 0.12
L1: 1.00, p - 0.68
L2: 0.99, p - 0.22
L02: 0.96, p - 0.03
Ni, Increment = 5 ng/nf
Wheeze
L0: 1.01, p - 0.59
L1: 0.97, p - 0.09
L2: 1.00, p - 0.76
L02: 0.99, p - 0.72
Persistent Cough
LO: 1.01, p - 0.21
L1: 0.99, p - 0.57
L2: 0.99, p - 0.23
L02: 1.00, p - 0.99
Shortness of Breath
LO: 1.04, p - 0.05
L1: 0.98, p - 0.36
L2: 1.00, p - 0.81
July 2009
E-222
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
L02: 1.04, p - 0.32
Chest Tightness
L0: 1.01, p - 0.58
L1: 1.00, p - 0.89
L2: 0.98, p - 0.27
L02: 1.01, p - 0.84
Inhaler Use
LO: 1.01, p - 0.48
L1: 1.00, p - 0.83
L2: 0.99, p - 0.51
L02: 1.01, p - 0.48
Source: Sea Salt
Na, Increment = 100 ng/nf
Wheeze
L0: 0.98, p - 0.23
L1: 1.00, p - 0.80
L2: 1.00, p - 0.88
L02: 0.97, p - 0.29
Persistent Cough
L0: 1.00, p - 0.58
L1: 0.99, p - 0.19
L2: 1.00, p - 0.61
L02: 0.98, p - 0.21
Shortness of Breath
L0: 1.00, p - 0.94
L1: 0.99, p - 0.46
L2: 1.01, p - 0.63
L02: 0.99, p - 0.74
Chest Tightness
LO: 0.99, p - 0.43
L1: 0.99, p - 0.75
L2: 1.00, p - 0.88
L02: 0.98, p - 0.61
Inhaler Use
LO: 0.99, p - 0.35
L1: 1.00, p - 0.61
L2: 1.00, p - 0.85
L02: 0.99, p - 0.37
CI, Increment = 10 ng/nf
Wheeze
L0: 1.00, p - 0.89
L1: 1.00, p - 0.88
L2: 1.00, p - 0.38
L02: 1.00, p - 0.81
Persistent Cough
July 2009
E-223
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
LO: 1.00, p - 0.31
L1: 1.00, p - 0.31
L2: 1.00, p - 0.51
L02: 1.00, p - 0.06
Shortness of Breath
L0: 1.00, p - 0.89
L1: 1.00, p - 0.94
L2: 1.00, p - 0.70
L02: 1.00, p - 0.80
Chest Tightness
LO: 1.00, p - 0.24
L1: 1.00, p - 0.28
L2: 1.00, p - 0.52
L02: 1.00, p - 0.65
Inhaler Use
LO: 1.00, p - 0.69
L1: 1.00, p - 0.52
L2: 1.00, p - 0.51
L02: 1.00, p - 0.83
Odds Ratio (95%CI) from repeated
measures logistic regression models
of respiratory symptoms and daily
source concentrations of PM2.5.
Lag 0 Model
Wheeze, p - 0.23
Motor Vehicle: 1.05 (0.99-1.10)
Road Dust: 1.10(1.01-1.19)
Sulfur: 0.97 (0.94-1.00)
Biomass Burning: 0.80 (0.66-0.98)
Oil: 1.02(0.86-1.20)
Sea Salt: 0.96 (0.86-1.07)
Persistent Cough, p < 0.001
Motor Vehicle: 1.02 (0.99-1.04)
Road Dust: 1.06(1.01-1.11)
Sulfur: 1.00 (0.98-1.01)
Biomass Burning: 0.97 (0.92-1.03)
Oil: 1.02(0.95-1.10)
Sea Salt: 0.99 (0.92-1.07)
Shortness of Breath, p < 0.001
Motor Vehicle: 1.06 (1.01-1.11)
Road Dust: 1.12 (1.02-1.22)
Sulfur: 0.98 (0.94-1.02)
Biomass Burning: 1.05 (0.95-1.17)
Oil: 1.07 (0.92-1.26)
Sea Salt: 1.01 (0.92-1.12)
Chest Tightness, p < 0.001
July 2009
E-224
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Motor Vehicle: 1.02 (0.97-1.08)
Road Dust: 1.04 (0.95-1.15)
Sulfur: 0.99 (0.94-1.03)
Biomass Burning: 1.06 (0.95-1.18)
Oil: 0.99(0.82-1.18)
Sea Salt: 0.95 (0.84-1.08)
Inhaler Use, p < 0.001
Motor Vehicle: 1.02 (1.00-1.05)
Road Dust: 1.06(1.02-1.11)
Sulfur: 0.98 (0.97-1.00)
Biomass Burning: 1.00 (0.96-1.03)
Oil: 0.98(0.91-1.05)
Sea Salt: 0.99 (0.94-1.04)
Lag 02 Model
Wheeze, p - 0.86
Motor Vehicle: 1.10(1.01-1.19)
Road Dust: 1.26 (1.05-1.51)
Sulfur: 0.98 (0.92-1.04)
Biomass Burning: 0.64 (0.46-0.88)
Oil: 0.80(0.56-1.08)
Sea Salt: 0.91 (0.82-1.16)
Persistent Cough, p < 0.001
Motor Vehicle: 1.03 (0.98-1.09)
Road Dust: 1.16 (1.02-1.32)
Sulfur: 1.01 (0.98-1.05)
Biomass Burning: 0.93 (0.81-1.06)
Oil: 0.84 (0.71-1.00)
Sea Salt: 0.88 (0.77-1.01)
Shortness of Breath, p - 0.006
Motor Vehicle: 1.12(1.01-1.24)
Road Dust: 1.28 (1.05-1.55)
Sulfur: 0.97 (0.90-1.04)
Biomass Burning: 0.78 (0.52-1.18)
Oil: 0.94 (0.69-1.29)
Sea Salt: 1.01 (0.79-1.29)
Chest Tightness, p - 0.39
Motor Vehicle: 1.08 (0.98-1.20)
Road Dust: 1.20(0.97-1.49)
Sulfur: 1.00 (0.92-1.08)
Biomass Burning: 0.87 (0.62-1.22)
Oil: 0.80(0.58-1.10)
Sea Salt: 0.95 (0.71-1.27)
Inhaler Use, p < 0.001
Motor Vehicle: 1.03 (0.98-1.08)
Road Dust: 1.09(1.00-1.19)
July 2009
E-225
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Sulfur: 1.00 (0.97-1.03)
Biomass Burning: 0.95 (0.87-1.04)
Oil: 0.92(0.81-1.05)
Sea Salt: 0.97 (0.88-1.07)
Odds Ratio (95%CI) from repeated
measures logistic regression models
of respiratory symptoms and daily
source concentrations of PM2.5 when
copollutants are included.
Wheeze
Motor Vehicle
NO?: 1.03 (0.98-1.08)
CO: 1.05 (0.99-1.11)
SO2:1.04 (0.99-1.09)
0a: 1.06 (0.97-1.16)
Road Dust
NO?: 1.11 (1.02-1.20)
CO: 1.10(1.01-1.19)
SO2:1.10 (1.01-1.19)
O3:1.11 (1.01-1.23)
Sulfur
NO2: 0.96 (0.92-0.99)
CO: 0.97 (0.94-1.01)
SO2: 0.97 (0.93-1.00)
0a: 0.95 (0.91-1.00)
Biomass Burning
NO2: 0.79 (0.65-0.98)
CO: 0.80 (0.66-0.98)
SO2: 0.79 (0.64-0.98)
0a: 0.74 (0.57-0.97)
Oil
NO2: 1.02 (0.87-1.21)
CO: 1.02 (0.86-1.20)
SO2:1.01 (0.86-1.19)
0a: 0.92 (0.62-1.39)
Sea Salt
NO2: 0.96 (0.85-1.07)
CO: 0.96 (0.86-1.08)
SO2: 0.95 (0.85-1.07)
O3:1.01 (0.72-1.40)
Inhaler Use
Motor Vehicle
NO2: 1.02 (0.99-1.04)
CO: 1.02 (0.99-1.05)
SO2:1.02 (0.99-1.04)
0a: 1.02 (0.98-1.07)
Road Dust
July 2009
E-226
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
NO?: 1.06 (1.02-1.10)
CO: 1.06 (1.02-1.11)
SO2:1.06 (1.02-1.11)
03:1.06 (1.00-1.13)
Sulfur
NO?: 0.98 (0.96-1.00)
CO: 0.98 (0.96-1.00)
SO2: 0.98 (0.96-1.00)
Oa: 0.97 (0.95-1.00)
Biomass Burning
NO2: 1.00 (0.96-1.03)
CO: 0.99 (0.96-1.03)
SO2: 0.99 (0.96-1.03)
03:0.99 (0.95-1.03)
Oil
NO2: 0.98 (0.91-1.05)
CO: 0.97 (0.91-1.04)
SO2: 0.97 (0.91-1.04)
Os: 1.03 (0.88-1.22)
Sea Salt
NO2: 0.99 (0.94-1.04)
CO: 0.99 (0.94-1.04)
SO2: 0.99 (0.94-1.04)
Os: 1.01 (0.88-1.15)
Reference: Girardot et al. (2006,
088271)
Period of Study: 10 August 2002-16
October 2002
17 June 2003-27 August 2003
Location: Charlies Bunion Trail (portion
of Appalachia Trail)
Outcome: Pulmonary
function/spirometry-FVC, FEVi, PEF,
FVC/FEVi, FEF2B-7B
Age Groups: 18-82 yrs
Study Design: Cohort
N: 354 hikers
Statistical Analyses: Multiple linear
regression
Covariates: Age, h hiked, mean Estimated personal:
temperature, sex, smoking status, history r
of asthma or wheeze symptoms, carriage 9 21, 41 g
of backpack, whether reaching summit or
not
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean:
Trail: 13.9 +1-8.2
Estimated personal: 15.0 +/¦ 7.4
Range (Min, Max):
Trail: 1.6, 38.4
Season: Fall 2002, Summer 2003
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Copollutant (correlation): O3 (r—0.67,
for estimated personal exposure)
PM Increment: 1 /yglm3
% Change +/¦ CI
p value
Univariate: FVC: 0.023 +/0.035
0.51
FEVi: 0.015 +/¦ 0.029
0.607
PEF: 0.185 +1- 0.091
0.043
FVC/FEVi: 0.003 +/¦ 0.023
0.905
FEF2B-7B*: 0.052 +/¦ 0.093
0.578
Adjusted: FVC: 0.007 +| 0.040
0.966
FEVi: 0.003 +/¦ 0.033
0.937
PEF: 0.258 +1- 0.103
0.013
FVC/FEVi:-0.011 +1-0.027
0.676
July 2009
E-227
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
FEF2B7B*: - 0.041 +1-0.109
0.707
Spirometry result for each quintile +/¦ CI
Quintile 1 (6.0 /yglm3): FVC (L): Prehike:
4.32 +/¦ 0.13
Posthike: 4.33 +1-0.12
FEVi (L): Prehike: 3.39 +1-0.10
Posthike: 3.40 +/¦ 0.10
FEVi/FVC (%): Prehike: 78.66 +/¦ 0.86
Posthike: 78.63 +/¦ 0.81
FEF2b-7b% (L/sec): Prehike: 3.27 +/¦ 0.14
Posthike: 3.26 +/¦ 0.14
PEF (Usee): Prehike: 7.91 +/ 0.22
Posthike: 7.58 +/¦ 0.22
Quintile 2 (10.4 //g/m3): FVC (L):
Prehike: 4.30 +/¦ 0.11
Posthike: 4.30 +/¦ 0.11
FEVi (L): Prehike: 3.42 +/¦ 0.09
Posthike: 3.43 +/¦ 0.09
FEVi/FVC (%): Prehike: 79.37 +/¦ 0.71
Posthike: 79.55 +/¦ 0.69
FEF2b-7b% (L/sec): Prehike: 3.39 +/¦ 0.14
Posthike: 3.38 +/¦ 0.14
PEF (Usee): Prehike: 8.37 +/ 0.23
Posthike: 8.26 +/¦ 0.25
Quintile 3 (14.8 //g/m3): FVC (L):
Prehike: 4.34 +/¦ 0.12
Posthike: 4.33 +1-0.12
FEVi (L): Prehike: 3.42 +1-0.10
Posthike: 3.40 +/¦ 0.09
FEVi/FVC (%): Prehike: 79.20 +/¦ 0.81
Posthike: 78.83 +/¦ 0.80
FEF2b-7b% (L/sec): Prehike: 3.19 +/¦ 0.13
Posthike: 3.21 +/-0.13
PEF (L/sec): Prehike: 8.12 +/0.25
Posthike: 7.89 +/¦ 0.25
Quintile 4 (17.9 /yg/m3):
FVC (L): Prehike: 4.23 +/-0.11
Posthike: 4.23 +/-0.11
FEVi (L): Prehike: 3.36 +/-0.10
Posthike: 3.36 +/¦ 0.10
FEVi/FVC (%): Prehike: 79.18 +/¦ 0.81
Posthike: 79.26 +/¦ 0.79
FEF2B-76* (L/sec): Prehike: 3.34 +/¦ 0.15
Posthike: 3.30 +/¦ 0.15
PEF (L/sec): Prehike: 7.75 +/ 0.25
July 2009
E-228
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Posthike: 7.73 +/¦ 0.26
Quintile 5 (25.6 //gfm3): FVC (L):
Prehike: 4.15 +/¦ 0.11
Posthike: 4.18 +1-0.12
FEVi (L): Prehike: 3.31 +/¦ 0.09
Posthike: 3.33 +/¦ 0.10
FEVi/FVC (%): Prehike: 79.73 +/¦ 0.66
Posthike: 79.55 +/¦ 0.64
FEF2b-7b% (L/sec): Prehike: 3.22 +/¦ 0.14
Posthike: 3.24 +/¦ 0.14
PEF (Usee): Prehike: 7.72 +f 0.22
Posthike: 7.77 +/¦ 0.23
Overall (15.0//gfm3): FVC (L): Prehike:
4.27 +/¦ 0.05
Posthike: 4.27 +/¦ 0.05
FEVi (L): Prehike: 3.38 +/¦ 0.04
Posthike: 3.38 +/¦ 0.04
FEVi/FVC (%): Prehike: 79.2 +/¦ 0.34
Posthike: 79.2 +/¦ 0.33
FEF2b-7b% (L/sec): Prehike: 3.28 +/¦ 0.06
Posthike: 3.28 +/¦ 0.06
PEF (Usee): Prehike: 7.97 +10.11
Posthike: 7.97 +1-0.11
Reference: Hertz-Picciotta et al. (2007,
135917)
Period of Study: 1994-2003
Location: Tepliee and Praehatiee, Czeeh
Republic
Outcome: Lower respiratory illness-
croup (J05, J04), acute bronchitis (J20),
acute bronchiolitis (J21)
Age Groups: Neonates followed for 2 to
4.5 yrs
Study Design: Cohort
N: 1133 children
Statistical Analyses: Generalized linear
longitudinal models
Covariates: District, mother's age,
mother's education, mother or adult
smoke, child's sex, season, day of the
week, fuel for heating and/or cooking,
breastfeeding category, number of other
children, temperature
Season: Winter, spring, summer and fall
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SUDAAN version 8
Lags Considered: 1-3,1-7,1-14,1-30,
1-45
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD):
PAH: 22.3 (SD-16 for 3-day avg and 11
for 45-day avg)
PM Increment: 25/yg/m3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Birth—23 months:
1.30[1.08,1.58] lag 1-30
2-4.5 yrs:
1.23(0.94,1.62] lag 1-30
RR Estimate for categories of exposure
[Lower CI, Upper CI]
Crude RR:
Birth—23 months:
> 50 //g/m3: 2.26 [1.81, 2.82] I
25-50//g/m3: 1.48 [1.32,1.65] li
< 25/yg/m3: Reference
2-4.5 yrs:
> 50 //g/m3: 3.66 [2.07, 6.48] I
25-50//g/m3: 1.60 [1.41,1.82] li
< 25/yg/m3: Reference
31-30
11-30
31-30
11-30
Reference: Hertz- Picciotta et al. (2007, Outcome: Lower respiratory illness- Pollutant: PM2.6
135917) croup (J05, J04), acute bronchitis (J20),
acute bronchiolitis (J21) Averaging Time: 24 h
Period of Study: 1994-2003
Age Groups: Neonates followed for 2 to Mean (SD):
Location: Tepliee and Praehatiee, Czech 4 5 yrs
Republic
PAH:
PAH Increment: 100 ng/m3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper
lag:
Birth—23 months:
CI]
July 2009
E-229
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Study Design: Cohort
N: 1133 children
Statistical Analyses: Generalized linear
longitudinal models
Covariates: District, mother's age,
mother's education, mother or adult
smoke, child's sex, season, day of the
week, fuel for heating and/or cooking,
breastfeeding category, number of other
children, temperature
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SUDAAN version 8
Lags Considered: 1-3,1-7,1-14,1-30,
1-45
52.5 ng/m3 (SD-57 ng/m3 for 3-day avg
and 46 ng/m3 for 45-day avg)
1.29[1.07,1.54] lag 1-30
2-4.5 yrs:
1.5611.22, 2.00] lag 1-30
RR Estimate for categories of exposure
[Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Crude RR:
Birth—23 months:
> 100 ng/m3: 2.52 (2.22, 2.87] lag 1-30
40-100 ng/m3:1.87 [1.65, 2.13] lag 1-30
< 40 ng/m3: Reference
2-4.5 yrs:
> 100 ng/m3: 2.26 (1.93, 2.65] lag 1-30
40-100 ng/m3:1.40 [1.20,1.64] lag 1-30
< 40 ng/m3: Reference
Reference: Hogervorst, et al (2006,
189460)
Period of Study: 2002
Location: Maastricht, the Netherlands
(six schools selected)
Outcome: Decreased lung function
Age Groups: 8-13 years old
Study Design: Multivariate linear
regression (enter method) analysis
l\l: 342 children
Statistical Analyses: AN0VA, chi
square
Covariates: Independent variables: /
height, gender, smoking at home by
parents, pets, use of ventilation hoods
during cooking, presence of unvented
geysers, tapestry in the home,
indoor/outdoor time, education level of
parents.
Dependent variables: lung function indices
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: Daily
Mean (SD): 19.0 (3.2)
Monitoring Stations: 6
Copollutant:
PMio
Total Suspended Particles (TSP)
PM Increment: 10 /yg/m3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
FEV: 3.62 [0.50,7.63]
lag NR
FVC: 1.80[-2.10, 5.80]
lag NR
FEF: 5.93[-2.34,14.89]
lag NR
Reference: Holguin et al, (2007,
099000)
Period of Study: NR???
Location: Ciudad Juarez, Mexico
Outcome: FeNO, FEVi
Study Design: Panel
Covariates: sex, age, body mass index,
day of week, season, years of maternal
and paternal education, passive smoking
Statistical Analysis: linear and
nonlinear mixed effects models
Age Groups: 6-12 years
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 48h
Mean (SD) Unit: 17.5 (8.9)/yg/m3
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Increment: NR
Relative Risk (Min CI, Max CI)
Lag
Results not given in table form, but
abstract states that no significant
associations with PM2.6 were observed.
Reference: Hong et al. (2007, 091347)
Period of Study: March 23-May3, 2004
Location: School on the Dukjeok Island
near Incheon City, Korea
Outcome: Peak expiratory flow rate
(PEFR)
Age Groups: 3rd to 6th grade (mean
age-9.6 yrs)
Study Design: Panel study
l\l: 43 schoolchildren
Statistical Analyses: Mixed linear
regression
Covariates: age, sex, height, weight,
asthma history, and passive smoking
exposure at home
Dose-response Investigated? No
Lags Considered: 0,1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 20.27 (8.23)
50th(Median): 22.07
Range (Min, Max): 5.94-36.28
Copollutant: PM10
Components of PM10 (Fe, Mn, Pb, Zn, Al)
Effect Estimate:
Regression coefficients of morning and
daily mean PEFR on PM2.6
Lag 1 (PM2.6)
Morning PEFR
Crude: B--0.14, p-0.12
Adjusted: B- -0.54, p,0.01
Mean PEFR
Crude: B- -0.15, p — 0.02
Adjusted: B- -0.54, p,0.01
Regression coefficients of morning and
_daM^jTiean_PEFR_on_PM2;B_and_GSTI\/n_
July 2009
E-230
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
and GSTT1 genotype using linear mixed-
effects regression
Lag 1 (PM2.B)
Morning PEFR: B- -0.57, p< 0.01
Mean PEFR: B- -0.56, p< 0.01
GSTM1
Morning PEFR: B- 20.04, p — 0.25
Mean PEFR: B- 18.75, p-0.28
GSTT1
Morning PEFR: B- 2.31, p-0.89
Mean PEFR: B- 1.75, p-0.91
Reference: Jansen, et al. (2005,
082236)
Period of Study: 1987-2000
Location: Seattle, WA
Outcome: FENO: fractional exhaled
nitrogen oxide, Spirometry, Blood
pressure, Sa02: oxygen saturation, Pulse
rate
Age Groups: 60-86-years-old
Study Design: Short-term cross-
sectional case series
N: 16 subjects diagnosed with COPD,
asthma, or both
Statistical Analyses: Linear mixed
effects model with random intercepts
Covariates: Age, relative humidity,
temperature, medication use
Season: Winter 2002-2003
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: STATA
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD):
Fixed-Site Monitor: 14.0
All Subjects (N-16)
Indoor, home: 7.29
Outdoor, home: 10.47
Asthmatic Subjects (N-7)
Indoor, home: 7.25
Outdoor, home: 8.99
COPD Subjects (N-9)
Indoor, home: 7.33
Outdoor, home: 11.66
Range (Min, Max):
Fixed-Site Monitor: 1.3, 44
IQR
All Subjects
Indoor, home: 4.05
Outdoor, home: 8.87
Asthmatic Subjects
Indoor, home: 5.72
Outdoor, home: 7.55
COPD Subjects
Indoor, home: (3.18
Outdoor, home: 6.71
PM Increment: PM2.6: 10 (xglm3
Slope [95% CI]: dependence of FENO
concentration [ppb] on PM2.6
Asthmatic Subjects
Indoor, home: 3.69 [-0.74: 8.12]
Outdoor, home: 4.23 [1.33: 7.13]*
Copd Subjects
Indoor, home: -0.35 [-7.45: 6.75]
Outdoor, home: 3.83 [-1.84: 9.49]
Results indicate that FENO may be a
more sensitive biomarker of PM exposure
than other traditional health endpoints.
Reference: Johnston, et al. (2006,
091386)
Period of Study: 7 months (April 7
through November 7, 2004)
Location: Darwin, Australia
Outcome: Asthma symptoms
Age Groups: All Ages
Study Design: Time-series
N: 251 i
(130 adults, 121 children
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression model
Covariates: Minimum air temperature,
doctor visits for influenza and the
prevalence of asthma symptoms and, the
fungal spore count and both onset of
_asthma_s^m£toms_an£^
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: Daily
Mean (SD): 11.1 (5.4)
Range (Min, Max): 2.2, 36.5
PM Component: Vegetation fire smoke
(95%) and motor vehicle emissions (5%)
Monitoring Stations: 1
PM Increment: 5 /yglm3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Symptoms attributable to asthma
Overall: 1.000 (0.98,1.01)
Adults: 1.000(0.976,1.026)
Children: 1.008 (0.980,1.037)
Using preventer: 1.013 (0.990,1.037)
Became symptomatic
July 2009
E-231
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
reliever medication
Season: "Dry season" note Southern
Hemisphere
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: STATA8
Lags Considered: 0-5 days
Overall: 1.150(1.07,1.23)
Adults: 1.165(1.058,1.284)
Children: 1.148 (1.042,1.264)
Using preventer: 1.181 (1.076,1.296)
Used Reliever
Overall: 1.000(0.98,1.02)
Adults: 1.007 (0.980,1.035)
Children: 1.002 (0.972,1.034)
Using preventer: 1.020 (1.000,1.042)
Commenced Reliever
Overall: 1.120(1.03,1.210)
Adults: 1.141 (1.021,1.275)
Children: 1.112(0.994,1.243)
Using preventer: 1.129 (1.013,1.257)
Commenced Oral Steroids
Overall: 1.310(1.03,1.66)
Adults: 1.601 (1.192,2.150)
Children: 0.995 (0.625,1.459)
Using preventer: 1.350 (1.040,1.752)
Asthma Attack
Overall: 0.980(0.94,1.04)
Adults: 1.026(0.962,1.095)
Children: 0.832 (0.731,0.946)
Using preventer: 1.002 (0.934,1.075)
Exercise induced asthma
Overall: 0.990(0.95,1.03)
Adults: 0.998 (0.943,1.056)
Children: 0.982 (0.899,1.071)
Using preventer: 1.002 (0.942,1.067)
Saw a health professional for asthma
Overall: 1.030(0.91,1.16)
Adults: 1.079(0.899,1.296)
Children: 1.003 (0.841,1.195)
Using preventer: 0.980 (0.847,1.133)
Missed school or work due to asthma
Overall: 1.025(0.9284,1.131)
Adults: 1.077 (0.923,1.247)
Children: 1.000 (0.873,1.458)
Using preventer: 1.005 (0.897,1.124)
Mean daily number of asthma
symptoms
Overall: 1.003(0.99,1.01)
Adults: 0.998 (0.984,1.012)
Children: 1.004 (0.985,1.023)
Using preventer: 1.013 (0.999,1.028)
JV[eanJ)aN^jiumbej_d_a££Ncat!onsj)f_
July 2009
E-232
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
reliever
Overall: 1.002(0.993,1.010)
Adults: 1.001 (0.986,1.016)
Children: 1.000 (0.980,1.021)
Using preventer: 1.005 (0.994,1.017)
Reference: Koenig et al. (2003,156653) Outcome: Exhaled NO (elMO)
Age Groups: 6-13 years old
Period of Study: Winter 2000-2001,
Spring 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Study Design: Cohort
N: 19 children
Statistical Analyses: Linear mixed-
effects regression
Covariates: Medication use, ambient NO
reading for specific individual on specific
day of session, mean ambient NO for
subject during session, mean ambient NO
for subject during all sessions
Season: Winter, Spring
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: STATA
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 10 consecutive days
Mean (SD): Outdoor: 13.3 (1.4)
Indoor: 11.1 (4.9)
Personal: 13.4 (3.2)
Central-site: 10.1 (5.7)
Range (Min, Max): Outdoor: Max: 40.4
Indoor: Max: 36.3
Personal: Max: 49.4
Central-site: NR
Monitoring Stations: Outdoor: NR
Indoor: NR
Personal: NR
Central-site: 3
Copollutant (correlation): Outdoor PM-
central-site NO: 0.50
For NO values < 100 ppb, outdoor PM-
central-site NO: 0.04
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3
Results presented as change in eNO (95%
CI)
Among ICS* nonuser
Personal monitor 4.48 (1.02, 7.93)
Outdoor monitor 4.28 (1.38, 7.17)
Indoor monitor 4.21 (1.02,7.41)
Central site 3.82 (1.22, 6.43)
Among ICS* user
Personal monitor -0.09 (-2.39, 2.21)
Outdoor monitor 0.74 (-2.28, 3.76)
Indoor monitor -1.11 (-5.08, 2.87)
Central site 1.28 (-1.23, 3.79)
* ICS: Inhaled corticosteroid
Reference: Koenig et al. (2003,156653) Outcome: Increased exhaled nitric oxide
(eNO)
Period of Study: Winter 2000-2001,
spring 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Age Groups: 6-13 years of age
Study Design: Combined recursive and
predictive model
N: 19 children with asthma
Statistical Analyses: Linear mixed
effects model
Covariates: Residence type, air cleaner,
avg outdoor temperature, avg daily
rainfall
Season: Winter, Spring
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package:
STATA 7.0 for health analyses, SAS 8.0
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: Daily
Mean: Home indoor 9.5
Home outdoor 11.1
Recursive model Eag: 7.0
Recursive model Eig: 2.1
Predictive model Eag: 6.0
Predictive model Eig: 4.0
Combined model Eag: 6.4
Combined model Eig: 3.2
25th: Home indoor 5.7
Home outdoor 6.3
Recursive model Eag: 4.2
Recursive model Eig: 0.0
Predictive model Eag: 3.4
Predictive model Eig: 0.9
Combined model Eag: 3.7
Combined model Eig: 0.5
50th(Median): Home indoor 7.6
Home outdoor 9.5
Recursive model Eag: 5.9
Recursive model Eig: 1.2
Predictive model Eaq: 5.0
PM Increment: 10-|jg/m3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
Eag - ambient-generated personal
exposure
Eig- indoor-generated personal exposure
eNO - exhaled nitric oxide
Recursive model with 8 children, Eag was
marginally associated with increases in
eNO [5.6 ppb [-0.6,11.9],
Eig was not associated with eNO (-0.19
ppb).
For those combined estimates, only Eag
was significantly associated with an
increase in eNO:
Eag: 5.0 ppb [0.3, 9.7]
Eig: 3.3 ppb [1.1, 7.7]
Notes: Effects were seen only in children
who were not using corticosteroid
therapy
July 2009
E-233
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Kongtip et al. (2006,
096920)
Period of Study: September 1-October
31,2004
Location: Dindang district, Bangkok
metropolitan, Thailand
Predictive model Eig: 2.2
Combined model Eag: 5.5
Combined model Eig: 1.7
75th: Home indoor 10.8
Home outdoor 14.6
Recursive model Eag: 9.2
Recursive model Eig: 2.3
Predictive model Eag: 7.5
Predictive model Eig: 4.9
Combined model Eag: 7.8
Combined model Eig: 4.2
Range (Min, Max): Home indoor 2.3,
36.3
Home outdoor 2.8, 40.4
Recursive Eag: 1.8,22.6
Recursive Eig: 0.0,17.2
Predictive Eag: 1.3,22.6
Predictive Eig: 0.0,33.0
Combined Eag: 1.3,22.6
Combined Eig: 0.0,33.0
Monitoring Stations: 19 personal
environmental monitors
PM Increment: 1 /yglm3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Model 1
Headache: 1.011 (0.999-1.022)
Nose congestion: 1.006 (0.997-1.015)
Sore throat: 1.000 (0.991-1.008)
Cold: 1.006(0.995-1.017)
Cough: 0.989 (0.980-0.998)
Phlegm: 0.998 (0.992-1.003)
Chest tightness: 0.995 (0.955-1.036)
Fever: 1.008 (0.993-1.024)
Eye irritation: 1.022 (1.011-1.033)
Dizziness: 1.027 (1.013-1.041)
Weakness: 0.996 (0.983-1.008)
Upper respiratory symptom: 1.001
(0.994-1.008)
Lower respiratory symptom: 0.997
(0.992-1.002)
Model 2
Headache: 1.004 (0.996-1.013)
Nose congestion: 1.003 (0.996-1.010)
Sore throat: 0.995 (0.989-1.001)
Cold: 0.996(0.988-1.004)
Cough: 0.990 (0.983-0.996)
Phlegm: 0.995 (0.991-0.999)
Outcome: respiratory and other
Outcomes reported
Age Groups: Age range 15 to 55 yrs
Study Design: panel study
N: 77 street vendors
Statistical Analyses: Binary logistic
regression
Covariates: Gender, age, type of fuel
used, working duration (months)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 70.94
Percentiles: 50th(Median): 72.05
Range (Min, Max): 23.20-120.00
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation):
SO?
NO?
Os
VOCs
CO
July 2009
E-234
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Chest tightness: 0.997 (0.970-1.025)
Fever: 1.010(0.998-1.022)
Eye irritation: 1.019 (1.010-1.028)
Dizziness: 1.020 (1.009-1.032)
Weakness: 1.003(0.994-1.012)
Upper respiratory symptom: 0.995
(0.990-1.000)
Lower respiratory symptom: 0.995
(0.991-0.999)
Reference: Lagorio et al. (2006,
089800)
Period of Study: 5/24/1999 to
6/24/1999 and 11/181999 to
12/22/1999
Location: Rome, Italy
Outcome: Lung function (FVC and FEVi)
of subjects with COPD, Asthma
Age Groups: COPD 50 to 80 yrs
Asthma 18 to 64 yrs
Study Design: Time series
N:COPD - 11
Asthma - 11
Statistical Analyses: Non-parametric
Spearman correlation
GEE
Covariates: COPD and IHD: daily mean
temperature, season variable (spring or
winter), relative humidity, day of week
Asthma: season variable, temperature,
humidity, and fB-2-agonist use
Season: Spring and Winter
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: STATA
Lags Considered: 1-3 days
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): Overall: 27.2(19.4)
Spring: 18.2 (5.0)
Winter: 36.7 (24.1)
Range (Min, Max): 4.5,100
PM Component: Cd: 0.46±0.40 ng/m3
Cr: 1.9± 1.7 ng/m3
Fe: 283 ± 167 ng/m3
Ni: 4.8±6.5 ng/m3
Pb: 30.6 ± 19.0 ng/m3
Pt: 5.0±8.6 pg/m3
V: 1.8 ± 1.4 ng/m3
Zn: 45.8±33.1 ng/m3
Monitoring Stations: 2 fixed sites: (Villa
Ada and Istituto superior di Sanita)
Copollutant (correlation): NO2 r - 0.43
O3 r - -0.51
COr - 0.67
SO? r - 0.34
PM 10-2.6 r - 0.34
PMior - 0.93
PM Increment: 1 /yg/m3
They observed negative association
between ambient PM2.6 and respiratory
function (FVC and FEVi) in the COPD
panel. The effect on FVC was seen at lag
24 h, 48 h, and 72 h. The effect on FEVi
was evident at lag 72 h. There was no
statistically significant effect of PM2.6 on
FVC and FEVi in the asthmatic and IHD
fB Coefficient (SE)
COPD
FVC(%)
24 h -0.80 (0.36)
48-h -0.89 (0.41)
72-h-1.10 (0.55)
FEVi(%)
24 h -0.47 (0.33)
48-h-0.69 (0.37)
72-h-1.06 (0.50)
Asthma
FVC(%)
24 h-0.14 (0.29)
48-h -0.07 (0.33)
72-h -0.06 (0.39)
FEVi(%)
24 h -0.30 (0.34)
48-h -0.36 (0.39)
72-h -0.40 (0.46)
Reference: Lee et al. (2007, 093042)
Outcome: PEFR (peak expiratory flow
Pollutant: PM2.6
PM Increment: 10 /yg/m3
Period of Study: 2000-2001
rate), lower respiratory symptoms (cold,
cough, wheeze)
Averaging Time: 24 h
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
Location: South-Western Seoul
Metropolitan area, Seoul, South Korea
Age Groups: 61-89 years of age (77.8
mean age)
Mean (SD): 51.15 (19.94)
Percentiles:
lag:
PEFR (peak expiratory flow rate)
Study Design: longitudinal panel survey
25th: 33.00
¦0.54 (-0.89,-0.19)
N: 61 adults
50th(Median): 53.20
1 day
Statistical Analyses: SAS MIXED,
logistic regression model
Covariates: Temperature (Celsius),
relative humidity, age,
75th: 87.54
Range (Min, Max):
17.94,92.71
relative odds of a lower respiratory
symptom (cold, cough, wheeze)
0.976(0.849,1.121)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Monitoring Stations: 2
1 day
Statistical Package: SAS 8.0
July 2009
E-235
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Lags Considered: 0-4 days
Reference: Lewis et al. (2005, 081079) Outcome: Poorer lung function (increased
diurnal variability and decreased forced
Period of Study: winter 2001 spring
2002
Location: Detroit, Michigan, USA
expiratory volume)
Age Groups: 7-11 years old
Study Design: Longitudinal cohort study
N: 86 children
Statistical Analyses: Descriptive
statistics and bivariate analyses of
exposures, multivariable regression
multivariate analog of linear regression.
Covariates: Sex, home location, annual
family income, presence of one or more
smokers in household, race, season
(entered as dummy variables), and
parameters to account for intervention
group effect.
Season: Winter 2001 (February 10-23),
Spring 2001 (May 5-18), Summer 2001
(July 14-27), Fall 2001 (September 22-
October 5), Winter 2002 (January 18-
31), and Spring 2002 (May 18-31)].
Dose-response Investigated? No
Lags Considered: 1 to 2 days, 3-5 days
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 2 weeks
Mean (SD):
Eastside
15.7 (10.6)
Southwest
17.5(12.2)
Range (Min, Max): 1.0, 56.1
Monitoring Stations: 2
Copollutant (correlation):
PMio 0.93
O3 Daily mean 0.57
O3 8-h peak 0.53
PM Increment: 12.5/yg/m3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Lung function among children reporting
use of maintenance CSs
Diurnal variability FEVi
Lag 1:1.61 [-0.5,3.72]
Lag 1:0.99 [-5.64,7.62] PMz.b + 0s
Lag 2: 2.96 [-1.74,7.66]
Lag 2: 4.62 [-4.31,13.54] PM2.1, + 0s
Lag 3-5: 1.37 [-1.49,4.22]
Lag 3-5: 2.70 [1.0, 4.40] PM2.6 + O3
Lowest daily value FEVi
Lag 1: -2.23 [-6.99,2.53]
Lag 1:3.36 [-3.92,10.63] PM2.1, + 0s
Lag 2: -0.21 [-4.09,3.68]
Lag 2: 0.88 [-8.69,10.46] PM2.1, + 0s
Lag 3-5: -0.76 [-5.00, 3.49]
Lag 3-5: -2.78 [-4.87 to-0.70] PM2.6 +
0s
Lung function among children reporting
presence of URI on day of lung function
assessment
Diurnal variability FEVi
Lag 1:4.08 [-1.78, 9.94]
Lag 1:3.99 [-2.76,10.74] PM2.1, + 0s
Lag 2: 7.62 [-0.49,15.73]
Lag 2: 4.10 [-1.41, 9.60] PM2.1, + 0s
Lag 3-5:1.47 [-7.73,10.67]
Lag 3-5: 3.81 [-1.83, 9.45] PM2.1, + 0s
Lowest daily value FEVi
Lag 1:-1.21 [5.62,3.21]
Lag 1:-0.74 [-4.14, 2.65] PM2.1, + 0s
Lag 2:-0.10(4.36,4.16]
Lag 2: -1.67 [-5.09,1.75] PM2.1, + 0s
Lag 3-5: -2.88 [-5.46 to-0.30]
Lag 3-5: -2.78 [-4.79 to-0.77] PM2.1, +
0s
Reference: Liu et al. (2009,192003)
Outcome: Decreased lung function
Pollutant: PM2.6
Increment: 5.4/yg/m3
Period of Study: 4wks in 2005
Study Design: Panel
Averaging Time: 1, 2 & 3 days
Percent Change (Min CI, Max CI)
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Statistical Analysis: mixed-effects
Mean (SD) Unit (Id): 6.5//g/m3
Lag
regression models
Range (Min, Max): 2.0-19.0
FEV1
Statistical Package: S-PLUS
Copollutant (correlation):
Same Day: -0.5 (-1.3-0.3)
Age Groups: Asthmatic children, 9-14
yrs.
SO2: 0.56
Lag 1 Day: -0.5 (-1.1-0.5)
NO2: 0.71
2-Day Average: -0.6 (-1.5-0.4)
0s:-0.41
3-Day Average: -1.1 (-3.1-0.9)
July 2009
E-236
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
FEF 25%-75%
Same Day: -1.9 (-3.5--0.3)
Lag 1 Day: -1.2 (-2.8-0.3)
2-Day Average: -2.0 (-3.8 -0.2)
3-Day Average: -3.3 (-7.2-0.8)
FeNO
Same Day: 5.3 (-3.6-15)
Lag 1 Day: 1.7 (-6.3-15)
2-Day Average: 4.3 (-5.4-15.1)
3-Day Average: -17.3 (-33.5-2.9)
TBARS
Same Day: 16.9 (2.2-33.6)
Lag 1 Day: 14.6(0.8-30.4)
2-Day Average: 22.0 (4.8-42.1)
3-Day Average: 69.1 (20.1-138.2)
8-lsoprostane
Same Day: 5.1 (-3.6-14.5)
Lag 1 Day:-3.8 (-12.1-5.3)
2-Day Average: 0.1 (-9.8-11.1)
3-Day Average: 5.8 (-15.8-33.0)/
Reference: Maret al. (2004, 057309)
Outcome: Respiratory Symptoms
Pollutant: 2.5
PM Increment: 10/yglm3
Period of Study: 1997-1999
Age Groups: Adults: Ages 20-51 yrs
Mean (SD):
OR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
Location: Spokane, Washington
Children: Ages 7-12 yrs
1997: 11.0(5.9)
lag:
N: 25 people
1998: 10.3(5.4)
Adult Respiratory symptoms: Wheeze:
1.04(0.86,1.26]
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
1999: 8.1 (3.8)
regression
Unit (i.e./yg/m3):
lag 0
Covariates: Temperature, relative
Monitoring Stations: 1 station
1.00(0.83,1.19]
|gn 1
humidity, day of-the-wk
Statistical Package: STATA 6
Copollutant (correlation):
lag i
PM2.6
0.99(0.84,1.17]
Lags Considered: 0-2 days
Inn 9
PMi
lag z
r - 0.92
Breath: 0.97(0.87,1.08]
lag 0
PM10
r - 0.61
0.98(0.87,1.10]
PM 10-2.6
lag 1
r - 0.28
0.95(0.80,1.13]
lag 2
Cough: 0.86(0.62,1.21]
lag 0
0.87(0.63,1.20]
lag 1
0.89[0.66,1.20]
lag 2
Sputum: 0.94(0.63,1.41]
lag 0
0.90(0.62,1.31]
July 2009
E-237
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
lag 1
0.92[0.66,1.27]
lag 2
Runny Nose: 0.98[0.83,1.15]
lag 0
0.95[0.82,1.10]
lag 1
0.93(0.80,1.08]
lag 2
Eye Irritation: 0.91 [0.70,1.20]
lag 0
0.89(0.70,1.13]
lag 1
0.86(0.68,1.08]
lag 2
Lower Symptoms: 0.91(0.73,1.13]
lag 0
0.89(0.72,1.10]
lag 1
0.89(0.72,1.10]
lag 2
Any Symptoms: 0.92(0.80,1.07]
lag 0
0.89(0.76,1.04]
lag 1
0.89(0.75,1.05]
lag 2
Children Respiratory symptoms:
Wheeze: 0.55(0.26,1.19]
lag 0
0.53(0.18,1.58]
lag 1
0.55(0.19,1.64]
lag 2
Breath: 1.13(0.86,1.48]
lag 0
1.12(0.86,1.44]
lag 1
1.10(0.82,1.48]
lag 2
Cough: 1.17(0.98,1.40]
lag 0
1.21(1.00,1.47]
lag 1
1.18(0.99,1.42]
July 2009
E-238
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
lag 2
Sputum: 1.06[0.92,1.22]
lag 0
1.10[0.91,1.34]
lag 1
1.09(0.92,1.30]
lag 2
Runny Nose: 1.09(0.85,1.39]
lag 0
1.12(0.89,1.41]
lag 1
1.16(0.94,1.42]
lag 2
Eye Irritation: 0.93(0.53,1.64]
lag 0
0.75(0.45,1.27]
lag 1
0.77(0.65, 0.91]
lag 2
Lower Symptoms: 1.18(1.00,1.38]
lag 0
1.21(1.00,1.46]
lag 1
1.17(0.96,1.43]
lag 2
Any Symptoms: 1.17(1.03,1.34]
lag 0
1.22(1.04,1.43]
lag 1
1.23(1.07,1.42]
lag 2
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI]
Lag
Personal: Systolic: 0.37 ( 0.93,1.67)
0
Diastolic: -0.20 (-0.85, 0.46)
0
Indoor: Systolic: 0.92 (-2.04, 3.87)
0
Diastolic: 0.38 (-1.43, 2.20)
0
Outdoor: Systolic: -0.81 (-2.34, 0.73)
0
Diastolic: -0.46 (-1.49, 0.57)
Reference: Mar et al. (2005, 087566)
Period of Study: 1999-2001
Location: Seattle, Washington
Outcome: Pulmonary function (arterial
oxygen saturation) and cardiac function
(heart rate and blood pressure)
Study Design: Time series
Statistical Analyses: Linear logistic
regression
Age Groups: > 57
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
July 2009
E-239
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
% Increase between heart rate and PM2.6
exposure for people > 57
PM2.5: Personal: 0.44 (0.04, 0.84)
0
Indoor: 0.22 (-0.71,1.16)
0
Outdoor: -0.75 (-1.42 to-0.07)
0
Reference: Mar et al. (2005, 088759)
Period of Study: 1999-2002
Location: Seattle, Washington
Outcome: Respiratory Symptoms
Age Groups: 6-13 years
Study Design: Time-Series
N: 19 children
Statistical Analyses: Polynomial
distributed lag model, Poisson regression
Covariates: Age, ambient NO levels,
temperature, relative humidity,
modification of use of inhaled
corticosteroids
Season: Winter, Spring
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: STATA
Lags Considered: 0-8 h
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-h
Mean (SD):
Results presented in Figure 1.
Monitoring Stations: 3 Stations
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3
Change in FE(NO) (exhaled NO
concentration) with air pollution
[Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Medication use:
Nomeds: 6.99(3.43,10.55]
lag 1-h
Meds:-0.18[-3.33, 2.97]
lag 1-h
No meds: 6.30(2.64, 9.97]
lag 4-h
Meds: -0.77(-4.58, 3.04]
lag 4-h
No meds: 0.46(-1.18, 2.11]
lag 8-h
Meds: 0.40(-1.94, 2.74]
lag 8-h
Reference: McCreanoret al. (2007,
092841)
Period of Study: 2003-2005
Location: London, England
Outcome: Decreased Lung Function
Age Groups: Adults
Study Design: Crossover study
N: 60 adults
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 1 h
Mean (SD): NR
50th(Median): Oxford St: 28.3
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression Hyde Park: 11.9
Covariates: Temperature, relative
humidity, age, sex, bod-mass index, and
race or ethnic group
Range (Min, Max): Oxford St: (13.9,
76.1)
Hyde Park: (3, 55.9)
% changes in FEV and FVC are presented
in figures 1-3. Results are not presented
quantitatively in text or tables. The
authors did not find any significant
differences in respiratory symptoms
between the two locations. Also, there
were no significant differences in sputum
eosinophil counts or eosinophil cationic
protein levels.
Reference: Moshammer and Neuberger
(2003, 041956)
Period of Study: 2000-2001
Location: Linz, Austria
Outcome: Lung Function: FVC, FEVi,
MEF26, MEFbo, MEFjb, PEF, LQ Signal,
PAS Signal
Age Groups: Ages 7 to 10
Study Design: Case-crossover
N: 161 children
1898-2120 "half-h means"
Statistical Analyses: Correlations
Regression Analysis
Covariates: Morning, evening, night
Season: Spring, Summer, Winter, Fall
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 8 h means 81 Daily
Means
Mean (SD): 14.61 (10.83)
Range (Min, Max):
(NR, 119.92)
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation):
LQ - 0.751
PAS - 0.354
Notes: "Acute effects of 'active particle
surface' as measured by diffusion
charging were found on pulmonary
function (FVC, FEVi, MEF50) of
elementary school children and on
asthma-like symptoms of children who
had been classified as sensitive."
July 2009
E-240
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Reference: Moshammeret al. (2006,
090771)
Period of Study: 2000-2001
Location: Linz, Austria
Outcome: Respiratory symptoms and
decreased lung function
Age Groups: Children ages 7-10
Study Design: Time-series
N: 163 children
Statistical Analyses: Generalized
estimating equations model
Covariates: Sex, age, height, weight
Dose-response Investigated? NR
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 1
Pollutant: PM2.B
Averaging Time: 8 h
Mean (SD):
Maximum 24 h: 76.39
Annual avg: 19.06
Percentiles: 8-h mean 25th: 8.64
8-h mean 50th(Median): 15.70
8-h mean 75th: 25.82
Monitoring Stations: 1 station
Copollutant (correlation): PMi
r - 0.95
PMio
r - 0.93
NO?
r - 0.54
PM Increment: 10//g|m3
% change in Lung Function per 10
z^g/m3
FEV: 0.23
FVC: 0.08
FEVob: 0.33
MEFjb*: -0.49
MEFbo%:-0.58
MEF2b%: -0.83
PEF: 0.41
% change in Lung Function per IQR
FEV:-0.59
FVC: -0.2
FEVob: 0.85
MEF?b%: -1.25
MEFbo%: -1.48
MEF2b%: -2.14
PEF:-1.06
Multiple pollutant model
FEV: 0.10
FVC: 0.21
FEVob: 0.06
MEF7b%: -0.15
MEF50%: 0.04
MEF25%: -0.21
PEF:-0.18
% change in Lung Function per IQR
FEV: 0.27
FVC: 0.54
FEVob: 0.15
MEFjb*: -0.39
MEFbo%: 0.11
MEF2b%: 0.54
PEF: 0.015:-0.47
Reference: Murata et al. (2007,
156787)
Period of Study: Nov 2nd-12th 2004
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Outcome: Exhaled nitric oxide levels,
(eN0), a marker of airway inflammation
Age Groups: 5-10 years
Study Design: Cohort/Panel study
N: 19 schoolchildren*
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression
Covariates: None
Season: November (fall)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: Lag h 1-24, 8-h
Pollutant: PM2.B
Averaging Time:
Hourly, 24-h
Mean (SD):
39.0 (16.9)/yglm3 (daily mean)
Range (Min, Max):
10,120 (range of hourly values)
Monitoring Stations: 1, on the street
where the children lived
PM Increment: IQR 110/yglm3
Mean [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
0.145 [0.62, 0.228] ppb eNO
8 h moving avg
Notes:
Associations for lag h 1-24 presented in
figures. Authors state "Individual hourly
lag models showed a consistent
association between the eNO value and
PM2.B for exposure in the previous 24 h"
"The trend on the graphs strongly
_suc|[|esUhaH]uctUc^^
July 2009
E-241
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
moving avg, 7-h moving avg, 6-h moving
avg, 24-h moving avg
affected by changes in air pollutants over
at least the previous 8-h period"
PM2.E, black carbon, and NOx were all
highly correlated (shown in figures), so
effects are difficult to separate
Pollutant concentrations peaked in the
morning and evening h during traffic
peaks
Reference: Neuberger et al. (2004,
093249)
Period of Study: 6/1999-6/2000
Location: Austria (Vienna and a rural
area near Linz)
Outcome: Questionnaire derived asthma
score, and a 1-5 point respiratory health
rating by parent
Age Groups: 7-10 years
Study Design: Cross-sectional survey
N: about 2000 children
Statistical Analyses: mixed models
linear regression-used factor analysis to
develop the "asthma score"
Covariates: Pre-existing respiratory
conditions, temperature, rainy days, #
smokers in household, heavy traffic on
residential street, gas stove or heating,
molds, sex, age of child, allergies of child,
asthma in other family members
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 4 week avg (preceding
interview)
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Copollutant (correlation):
PM10 (r-0.94)
in Vienna
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3
Change in mean associated unit
increase in PM
(p-value)
lag
Respiratory Health score
Vienna: 0.016 (p > 0.05)
lag 4 week avg
Rural area: 0.022 (p < 0.05)
lag 4 week avg
Asthma score
Vienna: 0.006 (p > 0.05)
lag 4 week avg
Rural area: 0.004 (p > 0.05)
lag 4 week avg
Reference: Neuberger et al. (2004,
093249)
Period of Study: Sept 1999-March
2000
Location: Vienna, Austria
Outcome: Ratio measure: Time to peak
tidal expiratory flow divided by total
expiration time (i.e., tidal lung function, a
surrogate for bronchial obstruction)
Age Groups: 3.0-5.9 years (preschool
children)
Study Design: Longitudinal prospective
cohort
N: 56 children
Statistical Analyses: mixed models
linear regression, with autoregressive
correlation structure
Covariates: Age, sex, respiratory rate,
phase angle, temperature, kindergarten,
parental education, observer (also in
sensitivity analyses: height, weight,
cold/sneeze on same day, heating with
fossil fuels, hair cotinine, number of tidal
slopes used to measure tidal lung
function)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS 8.0
Lags Considered: Lag 0
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
PM Component: Total carbon
Elemental carbon
Organic Carbon
Copollutant (correlation): PM10
(r-0.94) in Vienna
PM Increment: Interquartile range (NR)
Change in mean associated with an
IQR increase in PM (p-value)
lag
PM2.6 mass: -0.987 (0.091)
lag 0
Total carbon: -0.815 (0.041)
lag 0
Elemental carbon: -0.657 (0.126)
lag 0
Organic carbon: -0.942 (0.025)
lag 0
Reference: Neuberger et al. (2004,
Outcome: Forced oscillatory resistance
Pollutant: PM2.6
PM Increment: 1 /yglm3
093249)
(at zero Hz), FVC, FEVi, MEF26, MEFbo,
MEFjb, PEF
Averaging Time: 24 h
Notes: Authors report increased
Period of Study: Oct. 2000-May 2001
Monitoring Stations: 1
oscillatory resistance significantly
Age Groups: 7-10 years
associated with PM2.6 (lag 0)
Location: Linz, Austria
Study Design: Longitudinal prospective
cohort
N: 164 children
Statistical Analyses: Mixed models
linear regression with autoregressive
correlation structure
July 2009
E-242
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Covariates: Sex, time and individual
Season: October-May
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered:
Lag 0-7
Location: Boston, the Bronx, Chicago, (ICAS)-Panelfcohort study
Dallas, New York, Seattle, Tucson
Reference: O'Connor et al. (2008,
156818)
Period of Study: August 1998-July Age Groups: 5-12 years
2001
Outcome: Pulmonary function and Pollutant: PM2.6
respiratory symptoms
Study Design: Inner-City Asthma Study
Averaging Time: 24-h
Mean (SD): 14
Range (Min, Max):
5-35 (estimated from figure)
Copollutant (correlation):
NO? (r-0.59)
SO? (r — 0.37)
CO (r — 0.44)
O3 (r—-0.02)
PM Increment: 13.2/yg/m3 90th-10th
percentile
Change in pulmonary function
lag
FEVi: -1.47 (-2.00 to-0.94)
N: 861 children
lag 0-4
Statistical Analyses: Mixed effects
models
PEFR:-1.10 (-1.65 to -0.56)
Lags Considered: Lag 0-6, 0-4
lag 0-4
PM2.5+O3+NO2
FEVi: -0.73 (-1.33 to-0.12)
lag 0-4
PEFR: -0.25 (-0.88, 0.38)
lag 0-4
Risk of Respiratory Symptoms
lag
Wheeze: 0.98 (0.88,1.09)
lag 0-4
Nighttime asthma: 1.11 (0.94,1.30)
lag 0-4
Slow play: 1.01 (0.89,1.15)
lag 0-4
Missed school: 1.33 (1.06,1.66)
lag 0-4
PM2.5+O3+NO2
Wheeze: 0.92 (0.81,1.05)
lag 0-4
Nighttime asthma: 1.03 (0.86,1.23)
lag 0-4
Slow play: 0.92 (0.79,1.06)
lag 0-4
Missed school: 1.13 (0.87,1.45)
lag 0-4
July 2009
E-243
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Peacock et al. (2003,
Outcome: Reduced peak expiratory flow
Pollutant: Sulfate (SO42 )
Sulfate (SO42) Increment: 1.3/yg/m3
042026)
rate (PEFR)
Averaging Time: Daily avg
Odds ratio [Lower CI, Upper CI]
Period of Study: November 1,1996 to
Age Groups: 7-13 years of age
Mean (SD): Urban 2
lag:
14 February 1997
Study Design: Time Series
24 h avg: 1.3(1.1)
1.090 [0.898,1.322]
Location: northern Kent, UK
N: 179
Percentiles:
5 days
Statistical Analyses: generalized
10th: Urban 2 0.5
estimating equations
Covariates: Day of the week, 24-h mean
90th: Urban 2 2.4
outside temperature.
Range (Min, Max):
Season: Winter
Urban 2 0.3, 6.7
Dose-response Investigated? No
Unit (i.e./yg/m3):/yg/m3
Statistical Package: STATA
Monitoring Stations: 3
Lags Considered: Same day, lag 1, lag
2, five day moving avg
Reference: Peled, et al. (2005,156015)
Outcome: Reduced peak expiratory flow
(PEF)
Pollutant: PM2.6
PM Increment: 1 //g|m3
Period of Study: 5-6 weeks between
Averaging Time: Daily
(3 coefficient (SE) [95% CI]
March-June 1999 and September-
Age Groups: 7-10 years
Mean:
Ashkelon:
December 1999.
Study Design: Nested cohort study
Location: Ashdod, Ashkelon and Sderot,
Ashkelon: 24.0
PM2.6 MAX:-0.144 (0.12) [-0.38-0.09]
Israel
N: 285
Sderot: 29.2
Ashdod:
Statistical Analyses: Time series
analysis
Generalized linear model, generalized
estimating equations, one way ANOVA,
generalized linear model
Covariates: Seasonal changes,
meteorological conditions and personal
physiological, clinical and socioeconomic
measurements
Season: Spring, Autumn
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: STATA
Ashdod: 23.9
PM Component: Local industrial
emissions, desert dust, vehicle emissions
and emissions from two electric power
plants
Monitoring Stations: 6
Copollutant: PMio
PM2.6 MAX: -2.74 (0.61) [-3.95-1.53]
PM2.6 MAX xTMAX: 0.11 (0.02) [0.06-
0.16]
In Ashdod, PM2.6 and an interaction
between PM2.6 and temperature were
significantly associated.
July 2009
E-244
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Penttinen et al. (2006,
087988)
Period of Study: 11/1996-4/1997
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Outcome: Decreased lung function and
respiratory symptoms
Age Groups: Adults, mean age 53 years
Study Design: Time Series
N: 78 people
Statistical Analyses: Generalized least
squares autoregressive model
Covariates: Temperature, relative
humidity, day of study, day of study
squared, binary dummy variable for
weekends
Season: Winter, Spring
Dose-response Investigated? NR
Statistical Package: SAS version 6
Lags Considered: 0-3
Pollutant: PM2.6
PM Component: Soil, heavy fuel oil, sea
salt
Averaging Time: 24 h
Percentiles: 25th: Long range transport:
2.44
Local combustion: 1.75
Soil: 0.14
Heavy fuel oil: -0.13
Sea Salt: 0.22
Unidentifiable: -1.41
All sources: 6.47
50th(Median): Long range transport:
4.15
Local combustion: 2.41
Soil: 0.64
Heavy fuel oil: 0.10
Sea Salt: 0.27
Unidentifiable: 0.02
All sources: 8.37
75th: Long range transport: 7.33
Local combustion: 3.05
Soil: 1.46
Heavy fuel oil: 0.52
Sea Salt: 0.42
Unidentifiable: 0.74
All sources: 11.15
Range (Min, Max): Long range transport:
(¦0.89, 28.31)
Local combustion: (0.83, 6.51)
Soil: (-1.13,6.43)
Heavy fuel oil: (-0.67, 4.74)
Sea Salt: (0.09, 0.98)
Unidentifiable: (-4.40,4.77)
All sources: (4.11, 33.53)
Monitoring Stations: 1 site
July 2009
E-245
PM Increment: 1.3 /yglm3
PM2.5, long range: PEF Morning: 0.37[-
0.59,1.34]
lag 0
¦1.04[-1.88 to -0.19]
lag 1
-0.82[-1.81,0.16]
lag 2
0.221-0.64,1.08]
lag 3
-0.241-1.12,0.64]
5 day mean. PEF Afternoon: 0.201-0.67,
1.06]
lag 0
-0.201-1.24,0.83]
lag 1
-0.301-1.14,0.53]
lag 2
0.451-0.57,1.47]
lag 3
0.031-0.79, 0.85]
5 day mean. PEF Evening: -0.331-1.30,
0.64]
lag 0
-0.291-1.13,0.55]
lag 1
-0.411-1.46,0.64]
lag 2
0.391-0.47,1.24]
lag 3
0.071-0.81,0.95]
5 day mean
PM2.5, local combustion: PEF Morning:
-0.731-1.69, 0.23]
lag 0
-0.461-1.24,0.32]
lag 1
-0.431-1.49,0.63]
lag 2
0.341-0.47,1.15]
lag 3
-0.251-1.03,0.53]
5 day mean. PEF Afternoon: -0.21[-
1.07, 0.65]
lag 0
¦0.81 [-1.77, 0.16]
lag 1
-0.831-1.74,0.09]
lag 2
"¦^H^-^'not CITE OR QUOTE
lag 3
-0.871-1.63 to -0.12]
5 day mean. PEF Evening: -0.511-1.48,
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Pino et al. (2004, 050220)
Period of Study: 411995-1011996
Location: Santiago, Chile
Outcome: Respiratory Symptoms,
Wheezing bronchitis
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Bayesian
hierarchical analysis, cubic spline
Age Groups: 4 months-2 years old
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD) unit: 52.0 (31.6)
Range (5th, 95th): 17.0,114.0
Copollutants (correlation):
SO2: r- 0.73
NO2: r- 0.85
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
% increase in wheezing bronchitis and
PM2.6 exposure for infants 4 months to 2
years old
4.75(1.25,8.25)
1
3.85 (0.45, 7.75)
2
2.25 (-1.00, 6.00)
3
1.75 (-2.20, 5.75)
4
4.00 (0.25, 8.00)
5
5.00(1.00,8.50)
6
7.00(3.50,11.00)
7
8.10(4.00,11.25)
9.00(6.00,12.00)
9
8.75(5.75,12.00)
10
1.50(-3.50,4.75)
11
0.25 (-3.75,4.25)
12
0.00 (-4.00,4.00)
13
1.00(-3.50,4.50)
14
1.50(-3.50,4.50)
15
OR for wheezing bronchitis and PM2.6
exposure in infants 4 months to 2 years
old according to family history of asthma
Yes to family history of asthma
1.09(1.00,1.19)
1
1.10(1.02,1.20)
2
1.11 (1.02,1.22)
3
No to family history of asthma
July 2009
E-246
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
1.04 (1.00,1.08)
1
1.02(0.98,1.06)
2
1.01 (0.96,1.05)
3
Reference: Rabinovitch et al„ (2006,
088031)
Period of Study: 2001-2003 (two
winters 2001-2002 and 2002-2003)
Location: Denver, CO
Outcome: Bronchodilator doser
activations (daily) and urinary leukotriene
E4 (daily)
Age Groups: Children 6-13 years old
Study Design: School-based cohort
study
N: 73 children
Statistical Analyses: Doser activation:
Poisson regression with GEE with AR1
working covariance
Urinary leukotriene E4: linear mixed model
with spatial exponential covariance
Covariates: Temperature, pressure,
humidity, time trend, Friday indicator,
upper respiratory infection (URI), height
(leukotriene E4 only).
Season: Winter
Dose-response Investigated? NR
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 0-2 days
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: Morning (midnight to
11:00 AM) mean
Morning (midnight to 11: 00 AM)
maximum
24-h mean
Mean (SD): 24-h mean, TE0M
Year 1, N: 55 days
6.5 (3.2)
Year 2, N: 128 days
8.2 (3.7)
24-h mean, FRM
Year 1,N: 55 days: 11.8 (7.2)
Year 2, l\l: 122 days: 11.2 (5.5)
Morning mean, TE0M
Year 1, N: 71 days: 7.4 (4.7)
Year 2, N: 127 days: 9.1 (5.0)
Morning maximum, TE0M
Year 1, N: 71 days: 15.5 (9.5)
Year 2, N: 127 days: 18.4 (9.6)
Percentiles: 24-h mean, TE0M
Year 1
25th: 4.4
50th(Median): 6.2
75th: 7.9
Year 2
25th: 55
50th(Median): 7.3
75th: 9.9
24-h mean, FRM
Year 1
25th: 7.8
50th(Median): 10.1
75th: 14.1
Year 2
25th: 7.5
50th(Median): 9.3
75th: 13.3
Morning mean, TE0M
Year 1
PM Increment: IQR (over current and
previous day)
Doser Activation
Morning avg PM2.5 TEOM
Year 1: Pet Increase: 3.0 [-0.5: 6.6] p -
0.10
Year 2: Pet Increase: 2.7 [1.1: 4.4] p -
0.006
Aggregated years: 2.2 [0.7: 3.6] p -
0.005
Morning max PM2.5 TEOM
Year 1 Pet Increase: 4.0 [0.5: 7.6] p -
0.02
Year 2 Pet Increase: 2.3 [0.7: 4.0] p -
0.009
Aggregated years 2.6 [0.9: 4.2] p-
0.002
24-h PM2.6
TEOM
Lag 0: 0.4 [-0.7:1.6] p-value - 0.45
Lag 1: 0.9 [-0.7: 2.4] p-value - 0.27
Lag 2: -0.4 [-1.7: 0.9] p-value - 0.59
Lag 0-2 Avg: 0.6 [-1.0: 2.2] p-value -
0.43
FRM
Lag 0:0.2 [-1.2:1.6] p-value - 0.81
Lag 1: 0.9 [-0.9: 2.6] p-value - 0.31
Lag 2: -0.2 [-2.2:1.8] p-value -0.88
Lag 0-2 Avg: 1.2 [-0.6: 2.9] p-value -
0.20
Morning avg PM2.5
TEOM
URI not adjusted
Mild/Moderate Asthmatics: 1.5 [-0.5: 3.4]
p - 0.14
Severe Asthmatics: 3.7 [1.6: 5.8] p- -
0.0006
Difference between severity groups, p -
0.12
Aggregated severity group: 2.2 [0.7: 3.6]
p- 0.005
URI adjusted
Mild/Moderate Asthmatics: 1.0 [-1.9:
3.9]p — 0.50
Severe Asthmatics: 6.0 [1.8: 10.1] p -
July 2009
E-247
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
25th: 4.0
50th(Median): 5.9
75th: 9.6
Year 2 25th: 5.2
50th (Median): 8.5
75th: 11.6
Morning maximum, TEOM
Year 1 25th: 8
50th (Median): 13
75th: 20
Year 2 25th: 11
50th (Median): 16
75th: 23
Range (Min, Max): 24-h mean, TEOM
Year 1 (2.1,23.7)
Year 2 (1.7, 20.5)
24-h mean, FRM
Year 1 (4.3, 53.5)
Year 2 (3.4, 26.3)
Morning mean, TEOM
Year 1 (1.4,22.7)
Year 2 (1.6, 30.2)
Morning maximum, TEOM
Year 1 (4,42)
Year 2 (4,46)
Monitoring Stations: 2 (1 TEOM and 1
Federal Reference Monitor [FRM])
0.006
Difference between severity groups, p -
0.08
Aggregated severity groups: 2.7 [-0.1:
5.4] p- 0.06
Morning maximum PM2.5
TEOM
URI not adjusted
Mild/Moderate Asthmatics: 1.9 [-0.2: 4.1]
p- 0.07
Severe Asthmatics: 3.9 [1.1: 6.8] p -
0.006
Difference between severity groups, p -
0.29
Aggregated severity groups: 2.6 [0.9:
4.2] p- 0.002
URI adjusted
Mild/Moderate Asthmatics: 1.6 [-2.2: 5.4]
p - 0.41
Severe Asthmatics: 8.1 [2.9: 13.4] p -
0.003
Difference between severity groups, p -
0.03
Aggregated severity groups: 3.8 [0.2:
7.4] p - 0.04
Leukotriene E4
24-h PM2.5
TEOM
Lag 0:3.3 [-0.7: 7.2] p - 0.09
Lag 1: -1.6[-5.7: 2.5] p - 0.40
Lag 2: 1.1 [-2.8: 5.1] p- 0.64
Lag 0-2 Avg: 2.3 [-4.0: 8.6] p - 0.45
FRM
Lag 0: 2.7 [1.1: 6.5] p - 0.12
Lag 1: -0.8 [-4.9: 3.3] p - 0.65
Lag 2: -0.8 [-4.9: 3.3] p - 0.71
Lag 0-2 Avg: 2.6 [-2.3: 7.5] p - 0.27
Leukotriene E4
Morning avg PM2.5 TEOM
Height 25%ile: 8.9 [3.0: 14.7] p- 0.004
Height 50%ile: 5.9 [1.4: 10.4] p - 0.01
Height 75%ile: 1.9 [-3.4: 7.3] p - 0.47
Model wfo Height x Pollutant: 5.6 [1.0:
10.2] p - 0.02
Morning maximum PM2.5
TEOM
Height 25%ile: 8.3 [3.4: 13.2] p - 0.001
Height 50%ile: 6.1 [2.1: 10.2] p- 0.004
Height 75%ile: 3.2 [-2.0: 8.4] p- 0.23
J\/lodelj«/o_Hei2ht_^_Pollutant^_6;2_[1_;9^
July 2009
E-248
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
10.5] p - 0.006
Reference: Rabinovitch et al. (2004,
096753)
Periods of Study: 11/15/1999-
311512000
11/13/2000-3/23/2001
11/15/2001-3/22/2002
Location: Denver, Colorado
Outcome: Respiratory symptoms,
Asthma symptoms (cough and wheeze),
Upper respiratory symptoms
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Logistic linear
regression, PR0C Mixed, PR0C Genmod
Age Groups: 6-12
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): 10.8 (7.1)
Range (Min, Max): (1.8, 53.5)
Copollutant (correlation):
CO
NO?
SO?
0s
PM Increment: 1 /yg/m3
PISE)
AM:-0.003 (0.009)
PM: 0.004 (0.011)
Odds Ratio (Lower CI, Upper CI)
Lag
0.971 (0.843,1.118)
0-3 avg.
Reference: Ranzi et al. (2004, 089500)
Period of Study: February-May 1999
Location: Emilia-Romagmna, Italy (urban-
industrial and rural area)
Outcome: respiratory symptoms, PEF
measurements, drug consumption and
daily activity
Age Groups: Children, mean age - (7.2-
7.9 yrs)
Study Design: Panel study
N: 120 children
Statistical Analyses: Ecological
analysis and Panel analysis
Covariates: Temperature, humidity,
gender, medicinal use, symptomatic
status of previous day
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 0,1, 2, 3, 0-3 mov
avg
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD):
Urban - 53.07
Rural- 29.11
Monitoring Stations: 3
Copollutant (correlation):
TSP: r—0.613
daily air pollution concentrations: r-
0.658
PM Increment: 10 /yg/m3
Effect Estimate:
Urban-industrial panel
Cough and Phlegm: RR -1.0044 (1.0011-
1.0077)
Reference: Rodriguez et al. (2007,
092842)
Period of Study: 1996-2003
Location: Perth, Australia
Outcome: Body temperature, cough,
runny/ blocked nose, wheeze/ rattle chest
(daily)
Age Groups: Children 0-5 years old
Study Design: hospital-based cohort
study
N: 198-263 children
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression with GEE and AR (order not
specified) working covariance
Covariates: temperature, humidity
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 0-5 days
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 1-h and 24-h
Mean (SD): 1-h averaging, 20.767
24-h averaging, 8.534
Range (Min, Max): 1-h averaging
(0.012: 93.433)
24-h averaging
(0.004: 39.404)
Monitoring Stations: 10 total, usually
3-5 sites for each pollutant
Copollutant (correlation):
0s
N0 +
C0
PM Increment: NR
[Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag: NR
LAG: 0 day
PM2.5, 1-h
Body temperature: 1.004 [0.998: 1.011]
Cough: 1.006(1.000: 1.012]
Wheeze/rattle chest: 1.004 [0.998:
1.010]
Runny/blocked nose: 0.997 [0.983:
1.010]
PM2.5, 24-h
Body temperature: 1.005 [0.986: 1.024]
Cough: 1.019(0.999: 1.040]
Wheeze/rattle chest: 0.990 [0.969:
1.012]
Runny/blocked nose: 0.968 [0.926:
1.013]
LAG: 5 days
PM2.5, 1-h
Body temperature: 1.005 [0.999: 1.040]
Cough: 1.003(0.995: 1.010]
Wheeze/rattle chest: 1.005 [0.998:
July 2009
E-249
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
10.12]
Runny/blocked nose: 1.015 [1.000:
1.030]
PM2.5, 24-h
Body temperature: 1.020 [0.998: 1.011]
Cough: 1.006(0.984: 1.011]
Wheeze/rattle chest: 1.018 [0.997:
1.040]
Runny/blocked nose: 1.039 [0.990:
1.089]
LAG: 0-5 days
PM2.5, 1-h
Body temperature: 1.000 [0.998: 1.002]
Cough: 1.001 [0.999: 1.003]
Wheeze/rattle chest: 1.002 [1.000:
1.004]
Runny/blocked nose: 1.001 [0.997:
1.006]
PM2.5, 24-h
Body temperature: 1.000 [0.994: 1.005]
Cough: 1.004(0.997: 1.011]
Wheeze/rattle chest: 1.001 [0.995:
1.007]
Runny/blocked nose: 0.998 [0.985:
1.011]
Effect Estimate:
Multiple regression analysis between
inhaled factors in Antarctica
Total leukocyte
Cigarette smoking- 0.211, p< 0.001
Support staff- 0.139, p-0.024
Total PM- 0.168, p-0.004
Segmented PMN
Cigarette smoking- 0.015, p — 0.805
Support staff- 0.097, p —0.119
Total PM- 0.272, p< 0.001
Band-formed PMN
Cigarette smoking- 0.035, p — 0.543
Support staff- 0.010, p-0.864
Total PM - 0.470, p< 0.001
Monocyte
Cigarette smoking- 0.081, p —0.187
Support staff- 0.019, p-0.759
Total PM- 0.328, p< 0.001
G-CSF
Cigarette smoking- 0.131, p< 0.038
Support staff- 0.176, p-0.005
Total PM- 0.078, p-0.186
IL-6
Reference: Sakai et al. (2004, 087435)
Period of Study: November 14,1999-
March 28, 2001
Location: Diesel-powered ship from
Tokyo, Japan to Showa Station on Ongul
Island, Antarctica for 366 days (from
February 1, 2000) and then heading back
to Japan on February 1, 2001
Outcome: circulating leukocyte counts
and serum inflammatory cytokine levels
Age Groups: 24-57 yrs, mean-36.1 ±
4.7 yrs
Study Design: cohort
N: 39 members of 41 st Japanese
Antarctic Research Expedition (JARE-41)
Statistical Analyses: ANOVA
Covariates: Smoking history,
occupational pollutant exposure
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SPSS 11.5J
Pollutant: PMB 02 0
Averaging Time: 24 h
Unit (i.e. /yg/m3): particles/L
PM Component: organic and inorganic
substances, including microorganisms
Copollutant (correlation):
PM2.00.3
PMlO-5.0
July 2009
E-250
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Outcome: circulating leukocyte counts
and serum inflammatory cytokine levels
Age Groups: 24-57 yrs, mean-36.1 ±
4.7 yrs
Study Design: cohort
N: 39 members of 41 st Japanese
Antarctic Research Expedition (JARE-41)
Statistical Analyses: ANOVA
Covariates: Smoking history,
occupational pollutant exposure
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SPSS 11.5J
Pollutant: PMioe o
Averaging Time: 24-h
Unit (i.e./yg/m3): particles/L
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant (correlation!:
PM2.00.3
PMlO-5.0
Reference: Silkoff et al. (2005, 087471) Outcome: Lung function: FEVi, PEF
Reference: Sakai et al. (2004, 087435)
Period of Study: November 14,1999-
March 28, 2001
Location: Diesel-powered ship from
Tokyo, Japan to Showa Station on Ongul
Island, Antarctica for 366 days (from
February 1, 2000) and then heading back
to Japan on February 1, 2001
Period of Study: Winter 1999-2000,
Winter 2000-2001
Location: Denver, CO
Age Groups: Adults (>40 years-old)
with C0PD, as well as > 10 pack-years
tobacco use, FEVi < 70%, FEV1/FVC <
60%, and no other lung disease
Study Design: C0PD patient panel study
(2 independent panels
one for each winter)
N: 34 subjects (16 1st winter, 18 second
winter)
Statistical Analyses: mixed effects
models with first-order, autoregressive,
moving avg variance-covariance
binary outcomes (rescue medication use,
total symptom score) assessed using
Poisson regression with GEE and first-
order, auto-regressive variance-
covariance
Covariates: temperature, relative
humidity, barometric pressure
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-h
Mean (SD):
Winter 1999-2000: 9.0(5.2)
Winter 2000-2001: 14.3(9.6)
Percentiles:
Winter 1999-2000
25th 5.4
50th(Median): 7.7
75th: 11.3
Winter 2000-2001
25th 7.6
50th(Median): 11.7
75th: 17.2
Range (Min, Max): Winter 1999-2000
Cigarette smoking- 0.182, p — 0.004
Support staff- 0.076, p-0.228
Total PM- 0.158, p-0.008
Effect Estimate:
Multiple regression analysis between
inhaled factors in Antarctica
Total leukocyte
Cigarette smoking- 0.211, p< 0.001
Support staff- 0.139, p-0.024
Total PM- 0.168, p-0.004
Segmented PMN
Cigarette smoking- 0.015, p — 0.805
Support staff- 0.097, p —0.119
Total PM- 0.272, p< 0.001
Band-formed PMN
Cigarette smoking- 0.035, p — 0.543
Support staff- 0.010, p-0.864
Total PM - 0.470, p< 0.001
Monocyte
Cigarette smoking- 0.081, p —0.187
Support staff- -0.019, p-0.759
Total PM- 0.328, p< 0.001
G-CSF
Cigarette smoking- 0.131, p< 0.038
Support staff- 0.176, p-0.005
Total PM- 0.078, p-0.186
IL-6
Cigarette smoking- 0.182, p-0.004
Support staff- 0.076, p-0.228
Total PM- 0.158, p-0.008
PM Increment: SD
Winter 1999-2000: 5.2
Winter 2000-2001: 9.6
Model results reported graphically only.
No quantitative results reported.
Direction of slope (+I-) and statistical
significance (SIG: yes
NS: no) inferred from graphs.
Among subjects with severe COPD
observed in Winter 1999-2000,
statistically significant, but marginal,
improvements in PEF associated with
morning lag 0 PM2.6.
There were no statistically significant
associations between rescue medication
use and symptom score with PM.
July 2009
E-251
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
analysis run separately for each winter
(1.8, 36.6)
Season: Winter
Winter 2000-2001
Dose-response Investigated? No
(3.4, 59.6)
Statistical Package: SAS
Monitoring Stations: multiple sites
Lags Considered: 0-2 days
Copollutant (correlation):
CO
NO2
PM10
Reference: Sivacoumar et al. (2006,
111115)
Period of Study: 4/1998-5/1998
Outcome: Respiratory symptoms,
Decreased pulmonary function
Study Design: Case-control
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
The study does not present quantitative
results of association.
911998-1011998
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
Location: Pammal, India
Age Groups: > 18
Reference: Slaughter et al. (2003,
086294)
Period of Study: 1994
Location: Seattle, WA
Outcome: Asthma attacks, asthma
severity, medication use
Age Groups: 5.1 to 13.1 years old
Study Design: Cross-sectional study
N: 133 children
Statistical Analyses: Ordinal Logistic
Regression
Poisson Modeling
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time:
Daily Averages
25th: 5.0
50th(Median): 7.33
75th: 11.3
Monitoring Stations: 3
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3 increase
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Inhaler use:
1-day lag: 1.04 (0.98,1.10)
OR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Covariates: Temperature, Day of the
Week, Seasonality
Copollutant (correlation):
PM10 - 0.75
Asthma Attack:
1-day lag: 1.20 (1.05,1.37)
Dose-response Investigated? No
CO - 0.82
Previous day: 1.13 (1.03,1.23)
Statistical Package: STATA
Medication Use
Lags Considered: 1, 2, 3 day lag
Nontransition model:
Previous Day: 1.08 (1.01,1.15)
Notes: Figures of estimated odds ratios
for having a more serious asthma attack
for short-term, within-subject increases in
PM2.6, PM10, and CO. Transition models
additionally control for the previous day's
severity.
Figures of estimated relative risks for
having inhaler use for short-term, within-
subject increases in PM2.6, PM10, and CO.
Transition models additionally control for
the previous day's severity.
PM Increment: 10//g|m3
Effects Estimate:
Using the estimated slope for the
validation study model [Lower CI, Upper
CI]
lag:
2.2 percent decrease in FEVi per 10
/yg/m3 increase in ambient PM2.6 [0.0, 4.3
decrease]
1 day
Reference: Strand et al (2006, 089203)
Period of Study: 2002-2004
Location: Denver, Colorado, United
States
Outcome: Reduced forced expiratory
volume (FEVi)
Age Groups: 6-12 years old
Study Design: Mixed model analysis
(using the default restricted maximum
likelihood (REML) estimators)
N: 50 children
Statistical Analyses: least squares
regression, SAS "Output Delivery
System" (ODS)
Season: Autumn and Winter
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: SAS
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: daily
Mean (SD):
Outdoor: 12.699(6.426)
Indoor: 8.148(4.348)
Sulfate/PM2.6/outdoor: 0.079 (0.067)
Sulfate/Plfc/indoor: 0.074 (0.060)
Range (Min, Max):
Mean Personal: (0, 3.035)
Outdoor: (0, 6.303)
Indoor: (0, 2.759)
PM Component: elemental carbon,
sulfate, nitrate and ETS.
July 2009
E-252
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Monitoring Stations: 2 fixed monitors
and up to 10 personal monitors on a given
day.
Copollutant (correlation!: Sulfate (0.63)
Reference: Tang et al. (2007, 091269)
Period of Study: Dec 2003 to Feb 2005
Location: Sin-Chung City, Taipei County,
Taiwan
Outcome: Peak expiratory flow rate
(PEFR) of asthmatic children
Age Groups: 6-12 years
Study Design: Panel study
N: 30 children
Statistical Analyses: Linear mixed-
effect models were used to estimate the
effect of PM exposure on PEFR
Covariates: Gender, age, BMI, history of
respiratory or atopic disease in family,
SHS, acute asthmatic exacerbation in
past 12 months, ambient temp and
relative humidity, presence of indoor
pollutants, and presence of outdoor
pollutants,
Dose-response Investigated? yes
Statistical Package: S-Plus 2000
Lags Considered: 0-2
Pollutant: PM2.B
Averaging Time: 1 h
Mean (SD):
Personal: 27.8 (25.3)
Range (Min, Max):
Personal: 1.4-263.4
Monitoring Stations: 1
PM Increment: 24.5/yg/m3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Change in morning PEFR:
¦6.00 (-29.85,17.85) lag 0
¦12.52 (-77.93, 52.9) lag 1
¦24.87 (-71.49, 21.74) lag 2
¦45.67 (-117.09, 25.74) 2-day mean
¦5.69 (-105.96, 94.59) 3-day mean
Change in evening PEFR:
0.50(-18.82,19.82) lag 0
16.66 (-7.59, 40.9) lag 1
11.60 (-11.1, 34.31) lag 2
39.97 (7.1,72.85) 2-day mean
¦3.32 (-66.14, 59.5) 3-day mean
Reference: Timonen et al. (2004,
087915)
Period of Study: Oct 1998 to April
1999
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Erfurt, Germany
Helsinki, Finland
Outcome: Urinary concentration of Clara
cell protein CC16 of subjects with
coronary heart disease
Age Groups: 50 +
Study Design: Longitudinal cohort study
(panel)
N: 37 (Amsterdam)
47 (Erfurt)
47 (Helsinki)
Statistical Analyses: The response of
interest was log transformed, creatinine
adjusted CC16. Mixed-effect model was
used to investigate the association
between CC16 and air pollutants.
Covariates: Subjects, long term time
trend, temperature (lags 0-3), relative
humidity (lags 0-3), barometric pressure
(lags 0-3), and weekday of visit.
Dose-response Investigated? yes
Statistical Package: S-Plus and SAS
Lags Considered: 0-3
Pollutant: PM2.6
PM Increment: 10/yglm3
Averaging Time: 24 h
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
Mean (SD):
lag:
Amsterdam: 20.0/yg/m3
Pooled estimate;
Erfurt: 23.1 //g|m3
2.8 (-1.1-6.7) lagO
Helsinki: 12.7 //g|m3
2.9 (-0.6-6.5) lag 1
Range (Min, Max):
5.0 (-2.4-12.4) lag 2
Amsterdam: 3.8-82.2
1.6 (-4.7-7.9) lag 3
Erfurt: 4.5-118.1
9.7 (-6.0—25.4) 5-day mean
Helsinki: 3.1-39.8
CC16 was not associated to PM2.6
Monitoring Stations: 3
Copollutant (correlation):
Spearman Correlation:
NC 0.01-0.1: Amsterdam -0.15
Erfurt 0.62
Helsinki 0.14
NCo.i-i.o: Amsterdam 0.80
Erfurt 0.84
in the pooled analysis but CC16 was
significantly associated to PM2.6
in Helsinki:
23.3 (6.3-40.3) lag 0
6.4 (-8.2-21.1) lag 1
20.2 (6.9-33.5) lag 2
17.6 (4.3-30.9) lag 3
38.8 (15.8-61.8) 5-day mean
Helsinki 0.80
NO2: Amsterdam 0.49
Erfurt 0.82
Helsinki 0.35
CO: Amsterdam 0.58
Erfurt 0.77
Helsinki 0.40
Pollutant: PM2.6
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Averaging Time: 24-h
ADULT Personal PM2.5 - FEVi
Reference: Trenga et al. (2006,155209) Outcome: Lung function: FEVi, PEF,
MMEF (maximal midexpiratory flow
Period of Study: 1999-2002
July 2009
E-253
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Location: Seattle, WA
assessed only for children)
Age Groups: Adults (56-89-years-old)
healthy & with COPD
asthmatic children 6-13-years-old
Study Design: adult and pediatric panel
study over three years with 1 monitoring
period ("session") per year
N: 57 adults (33 healthy, 24 with COPD)
- 692 subject-days - 207 study-days
17 asthmatic children - 319 subject-
days - 98 study-days
Statistical Analyses: mixed effects,
longitudinal regression models, with the
effects of pollutant decomposed into
each subject's a) overall mean
b) difference between their session-
specific mean and overall mean
c) difference between their daily values
and session-specific mean
Covariates: gender, age, ventral site
temperature and relative humidity, 00,
NO?
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 0-1 days
Percentiles:
Children, Personal
25,h: 8.1
50th(Median): 11.3
75th: 16.3
Indoor
25th: 5.7
50th(Median): 7.5
75th: 10.2
Local outdoor
25th: 6.4
50th(Median): 9.6
75th: 14.8
Adults, Personal
25th: 5.9
50th(Median): 8.5
75th: 12.4
Indoor
25th: 5.1
50th(Median): 7.6
75th: 10.8
Local outdoor
25th: 6
50th(Median): 8.6
75th: 13.1
Range (Min, Max):
Children, Personal 1.0, 49.4
Indoor (2.2, 36.3)
Local outdoor (2.8,40.4)
Adults, Personal 1.3, 66.6
lndoor(1.6, 65.3)
Local outdoor(0.0,41.5)
Monitoring Stations: 2
also subject-specific local outdoors (i.e.,
at each home), indoor, and personal
Copollutant (correlation):
CO
NO?
PM2.6
PM10-2.B (coarse)
Overall: Lag 0 -6.0 [-29.1: 17.2]
Lag 1 12.0 [-12.9: 36.9]
No-COPD: Lag 0 -4.6 [-31.0: 21.9]
Lag 1 19.3 [-8.2: 46.7]
COPD: Lag 0 -10.2 [-55.8: 35.4]
Lag 1 -19.0 [-74.1: 36.2]
PEF: Lag 01.5 [-2.2: 5.2]
Lag 1 2.1 [-1.9: 6.1]
No-COPD: Lag 0 3.4 [-0.9: 7.6]
Lag 1 1.9[-2.5: 6.3]
COPD: Lag 0-4.3 [-11.5: 3.0]
Lag 1 2.6 [-6.3: 11.5]
Indoor PM2.5 - FEVi Overall: Lag 0 -12.8
[-44.5:19.0]
Lag 1 19.4[-11.3:50.1]
No-COPD: Lag 0-15.8 [-50.0: 18.4]
Lag 1 28.4[-4.6: 61.3]
COPD: Lag 0 2.6 [-71.7: 76.8]
Lag 1 -29.7 [-102.9: 43.5]
PEF Overall: Lag 0 -0.5 [-5.6: 4.6]
Lag 1 2.3 [-3.3: 7.8]
No-COPD: Lag 0 0.1 [-5.4: 5.6]
Lag 1 2.5 [-3.5: 8.4]
COPD: Lag 0 -3.2 [-15.1: 8.7]
Lag 1 1.1 [-12.0: 14.3]
Outdoor Home PM2.5 - FEVi Overall: Lag
0 -1.4 [-35.6: 32.7]
Lag 1 -2.4 [-37.6: 32.7], No-COPD: Lag 0
1.5 [-36.1: 39.2]
Lag 1 10.7[-26.9:48.4]
COPD: Lag 0-8.9 [-62.2: 44.4]
Lag 1 -45.2 [-102.6: 12.1]
PEF Overall: Lag 0 2.3 [-3.3: 7.9]
Lag 1 0.4[-5.6: 6.4]
No-COPD: Lag 0 4.0 [-2.2:10.1]
Lag 1 2.0 [-4.4: 8.4]
COPD: Lag 0 -1.8 [-10.6: 6.9]
Lag 1 -4.8 [-14.6: 4.9]
Central Sites PM2.5 - FEVi Overall: Lag
0-35.5 [-70.0:-1.0]
Lag 1 -40.4 [-71.1: -9.6], No-COPD: Lag 0
-32.6 [-69.5: 4.3]
Lag 1 -29.0 [-62.5: 4.5]
COPD: Lag 0 -43.6 [-95.0: 7.8]
Lag 1 -70.8 [-118.4: 23.1]
PEF Overall: Lag 0 1.5 [-4.2: 7.1]
Lag 1 -2.3 [-7.4: 2.9]
July 2009
E-254
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
No-COPD: Lag 0 2.5 [-3.5: 8.6]
Lag 1 -0.5 [-6.1: 5.0]
COPD: Lag 0-1.5 [-9.9: 6.9]
Lag 1 -7.1 [-15.0:0.9]
PEDIATRIC FEVi Personal PM2.5
Overall: Lag 0 -13.08 [-38.26: 12.10]
Lag 1 -16.12 [-42.61: 10.37], No Anti-
inflam. Medication: Lag 0 -41.73 [-94.31:
10.84]
Lag 1 -30.99 [-82.17: 20.19], Anti-inflam.
Medication: Lag 0 -4.61 [-34.49: 25.28]
Lag 1 -10.87 [-45.01: 23.27]
Indoor PM2.5 Overall: Lag 0 -45.90 [¦
89.92:1.88]
Lag 1 -64.78 [-111.27: 18.28]
No Anti-inflam. Medication: Lag 0 -75.92
[-145.16: 6.67]
Lag 1 -65.08 [-136.98: 6.82], Anti-inflam.
Medication: Lag 0 -28.50 [-94.72: 37.71]
Lag 1 -64.60-147.23:18.04]
Outdoor Home PM2.5 Overall: Lag 0 -
13.11 [-57.41:31.19]
Lag 1 -9.37 [-54.73: 36.00], No Anti-
inflam. Medication: Lag 0 -24.42 [-81.22:
32.38]
Lag 1 16.52 [-45.76: 78.80], Anti-inflam.
Medication: Lag 0 -3.59 [-75.88: 68.70]
Lag 1-26.76 [-89.53: 36.01]
Central Sites PM2.5. Overall: Lag 0 -
12.32 [-53.21:28.56]
Lag 1 5.75 [-33.27: 44.76], No Anti-
inflam. Medication: Lag 0 -33.59 [-89.99:
22.82]
Lag 1 31.30 [-29.91: 92.51]Anti-inflam.
Medication: Lag 0 -2.13 [-71.99: 67.73]
Lag 1 -3.53 [-67.32: 60.27]
PEF: Personal PM2.5 Overall: Lag 0 0.31
[-4.02: 4.64]
Lag 1 -2.19 [-6.49: 2.12]
No Anti-inflam. Medication: Lag 0 0.22 [¦
8.85: 9.29]
Lag 1 -10.48 [-18.68: 2.28]
Anti-inflam. Medication: Lag 0 0.34 [¦
4.67: 5.35]
Lag 1 0.74[-4.21:5.69]
Indoor PM2.5 Overall: Lag 0 -8.68 [¦
16.64: -0.72]
Lag 1 -9.22 [-17.51: -0.93]
No Anti-inflam. Medication: Lag 0 -13.34
[-25.90: -0.79]
Lag 1 -17.13 [-29.86: 4.41], Anti-inflam.
Medication: Lag 0 -5.98 [-15.85: 3.89]
Lag 1 -4.19 [-14.59: 6.20]
JlutdooiJJomeJ^M^^^
July 2009
E-255
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
6.27 [-14.07: 1.53]
Lag 1 -5.64 [-13.73: 2.44], NoAnti-
inflam. Medication: Lag 0-7.52 [-17.56:
2.51]
Lag 1 -6.92 [-18.03: 4.19], Anti-inflam.
Medication: Lag 0 -5.22 [-14.77: 4.34]
Lag 1 -4.78 [-14.42: 4.86]
Central Sites PM2.5
Overall: Lag 0 -5.62 [-12.86: 1.62]
Lag 1 -2.45 [-9.34: 4.43], No Anti-inflam.
Medication: Lag 0 -6.32 [-16.31: 3.68]
Lag 1 -0.83 [-11.60: 9.95]
Anti-inflam. Medication: Lag 0-5.29 [¦
13.42:2.85]
Lag 1 -3.04 [-10.76: 4.67]
MMEF - Personal PM2.5
Overall: Lag 0 -0.99 [-3.96:1.98]
Lag 1 -1.08 [-4.05: 1.88], No Anti-inflam.
Medication: Lag 0 -3.32 [-9.52: 2.88]
Lag 1 -2.49 [-8.23: 3.25], Anti-inflam.
Medication: Lag 0 -0.31 [-3.77: 3.16]
Lag 1 -0.59 [-4.06: 2.89]
Indoor PM2.5
Overall: Lag 0-3.29 [-8.52:1.94]
Lag 1 -11.08 [-16.26: 5.90], No Anti-
inflam. Medication: Lag 0-12.65 [-20.74:
¦4.56]' Lag 1 -13.84 [-21.82: 5.85]/. Anti-
inflam. Medication: Lag 0 2.14 [-4.17:
8.45]
Lag 1 -9.33 [-15.89:-2.78]
Outdoor Home PM2.5 Overall: Lag 0 -
4.13[-9.28: 1.01]
Lag 1 -0.73 [-6.02: 4.56]
No Anti-inflam. Medication: Lag 0 -8.23 [¦
14.77:1.69]
Lag 1 -1.19 [-8.45: 6.07]
Anti-inflam. Medication: Lag 0-0.68 [¦
6.87: 5.50]
Lag 1 -0.42 [-6.72: 5.87]
Central Sites PM2.5. Overall: Lag 0 -
2.10 [-6.99: 2.79]
Lag 1 -0.12 [-4.67: 4.42]
No Anti-inflam. Medication: Lag 0 -8.21 [¦
14.79:1.62]
Lag 1 -0.22 [-7.34: 6.90]
Anti-inflam. Medication: Lag 0 0.82 [¦
4.48: 6.12], Lag 1-0.09 [-5.19: 5.01]
Reference: Tang et al. (2007, 091269) Outcome: Peak expiratory flow rate Pollutant: PM2 e 1 No quantitative effects reported.
(PEFR) of asthmatic children
Period of Study: Dec 2003 to Feb 2005 Averaging Time: 1 h
Age Groups: 6-12 years
Location: Sin-Chung City, Taipei County, Mean (SD):
Taiwan Study Design: Panel study
Personal: 6.2 (4.8)
l\l: 30 children
July 2009
E-256
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Statistical Analyses: Linear mixed-
effect models were used to estimate the
effect of PM exposure on PEFR
Covariates: Gender, age, BMI, history of
respiratory or atopic disease in family,
SHS, acute asthmatic exacerbation in
past 12 months, ambient temp and
relative humidity, presence of indoor
pollutants, and presence of outdoor
pollutants,
Dose-response Investigated? yes
Statistical Package: S-Plus 2000
Lags Considered: 0-2
Range (Min, Max):
Personal: 0.3-86.8
Monitoring Stations: 1
Reference: Tang et al. (2007, 091269)
Period of Study: Dec 2003 to Feb 2005
Location: Sin-Chung City, Taipei County,
Taiwan
Outcome: Peak expiratory flow rate
(PEFR) of asthmatic children
Age Groups: 6-12 years
Study Design: Panel study
N: 30 children
Statistical Analyses: Linear mixed-
effect models were used to estimate the
effect of PM exposure on PEFR
Covariates: Gender, age, BMI, history of
respiratory or atopic disease in family,
SHS, acute asthmatic exacerbation in
past 12 months, ambient temp and
relative humidity, presence of indoor
pollutants, and presence of outdoor
pollutants,
Dose-response Investigated? yes
Statistical Package:
S-Plus 2000
Lags Considered: 0-2
Pollutant: PMi
Averaging Time: 1 h
Mean (SD):
Personal: 34.0 (28.9)
Ambient: 31.4 (18.8)
Range (Min, Max):
Personal: 1.8-284.6
Ambient: 0.1-128.4
Unit (i.e. //g/m3): //g/m3
Monitoring Stations: 1
PM Increment: 27.6//g/m3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Change in morning PEFR:
¦6.44 (-30.18,17.29) lag 0
¦12.26 (-77.6, 53.09) lag 1
¦4.38 (-54.79, 46.03) lag 2
¦44.06 (-113.79, 25.67) 2-day mean
¦6.01 (-101.48, 89.46) 3-day mean
Change in evening PEFR:
I.17 (-17.79, 20.13) lagO
¦4.98 (-27.77,17.81) lag 1
II.30 (-11.55, 34.16) lag 2
41.74(11.36,72.13) 2-day mean
28.21 (-19.08, 75.5) 3-day mean
Reference: Timonen et al. (2004,
087915)
Period of Study: Oct 1998 to April 1999
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Erfurt, Germany
Helsinki, Finland
Outcome: Urinary concentration of Clara
cell protein CC16 of subjects with
coronary heart disease
Pollutant: IMC 0.01-0.1
Averaging Time: 24 h
PM Increment: 10,000 /cm3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
Age Groups: 50 +
Mean (SD):
lag:
Study Design: Longitudinal cohort study
Amsterdam: 17338 /cm3
Pooled estimate;
(panel)
Erfurt: 21124 /cm3
1.7 (-4.4-7.8) lag 0
N:
Helsinki: 17041 /cm3
¦1.8 (-8.3-4.6) lag 1
l\l - 37 (Amsterdam)
Range (Min, Max):
1.5 (-5.6-8.6) lag 2
N-47 (Erfurt)
Amsterdam: 5699-37195
2.3 (-4.8-9.3) lag 3
N-47 (Helsinki)
Erfurt: 3867-96678
1.8 (-9.4-13.0) 5-day mean
Statistical Analyses: The response of
interest was log transformed, creatinine
adjusted CC16. Mixed-effect model was
used to investigate the association
between CC16 and air pollutants.
Helsinki: 2305-50306
Unit (i.e. //g/m3): 1/cm3
Monitoring Stations: 3
There was no association between NC 0.01
11 and CC16 in the pooled analysis.
Covariates: Subjects, long term time
trend, temperature (lags 0-3), relative
humidity (lags 0-3), barometric pressure
(lags 0-3), and weekday of visit.
PM2.6:
Amsterdam -0.15
Erfurt 0.62
Dose-response Investigated? yes
Helsinki 0.14
Statistical Package:
NO?:
S-Plus and SAS
Amsterdam 0.49
Lags Considered: 0-3
Erfurt 0.82
July 2009
E-257
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Helsinki 0.72
CO:
Amsterdam 0.22
Erfurt 0.72
Helsinki 0.35
Outcome: Urinary concentration of Clara
cell protein CC16 of subjects with
coronary heart disease
Pollutant: IMC 10-0.1
Averaging Time: 24 h
PM Increment: 1000 /cm3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
Age Groups: 50 +
Mean (SD):
lag:
Study Design: Longitudinal cohort study
Amsterdam: 2131 /cm3
Pooled estimate;
(panel)
Erfurt: 1829 / cm3
4.3 (-1.4-10.0) lagO
N:
Helsinki: 1390 /cm3
5.1 (-0.6-10.7) lag 1
l\l - 37 (Amsterdam)
Range (Min, Max):
4.5 (-0.5-9.6) lag 2
N-47 (Erfurt)
Amsterdam: 413-6413
1.6 (-3.5-6.7) lag 3
N-47 (Helsinki)
Erfurt: 303-6848
13.1 (-4.3—30.5) 5-day mean
Statistical Analyses: The response of
interest was log transformed, creatinine
adjusted CC16. Mixed-effect model was
used to investigate the association
between CC16 and air pollutants.
Helsinki: 344-3782
Unit (i.e./yg/m3): 1/cm3
Monitoring Stations: 3
CC16 was not associated to NC 0.1-1.0
in the pooled analysis but CC16 was
significantly associated to NC 0.1-1.0 in
Helsinki:
Covariates: Subjects, long term time
trend, temperature (lags 0-3), relative
humidity (lags 0-3), barometric pressure
(lags 0-3), and weekday of visit.
Copollutant (correlation):
Spearman Correlation:
NC 0.1-0.01:
15.5 (0.001-30.9) lag 0
10.8 (-4.2-25.8) lag 1
10.5 9-4.1-25.1) lag 2
Dose-response Investigated? yes
Amsterdam 0.16
17.4 (3.4-31.4) lag 3
Statistical Package: S-Plus and SAS
Erfurt 0.67
43.2 (17.4-69.0) 5-day mean
Lags Considered: 0-3
Helsinki 0.53
PM2.6:
Amsterdam 0.80
Erfurt 0.84
Helsinki 0.80
NO?:
Amsterdam 0.67
Erfurt 0.82
Helsinki 0.72
Reference: Timonen et al. (2004,
087915)
Period of Study: Oct 1998 to April 1999
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Erfurt, Germany
Helsinki, Finland
CO:
Amsterdam 0.60
Erfurt 0.78
Helsinki 0.51
Reference: von Klot et al. (2002,
034706)
Period of Study: September 1996 to
March 1997 (winter)
Location: Erfurt, Germany
Outcome: Asthma symptoms (wheezing,
shortness of breath at rest, waking up
with breathing problems, or coughing
without having a cold) and Asthma
medication (inhaled short-acting B2-
agonists, inhaled long-acting B2- agonists,
inhaled corticosteroids, cromolyn sodium,
theophylline, oral corticosteroids, and N-
acetylcysteine)
Age Groups: Adults, mean-59.0 yrs and
range —37-77 yrs
Study Design: panel study
N: 53 adult asthmatics
Statistical Analyses: Logistic regression
Pollutant: MCob-o.i
Averaging Time: 10 min intervals
Mean (SD): 24.8
Percentiles:
25th: 11.4
50th(Median): 19.6
75th: 33.1
Range (Min, Max): (2.4-108.3)
Copollutant (correlation):
PMio-2.b: r- 0.51
NC Increment: 1 IQR
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Association between the prevalence of
inhaled B2- agonist use and MC0.1-0.5
Same day, IQR - 21, OR - 0.98(0.92-
1.04)
5-day mean, IQR- 21 OR- 1.11 (1.02-
1.20)
14-day mean IQR - 17, OR - 1.01 (0.93-
1.10)
Association between the prevalence of
inhaled corticosteroid use and MC0.1-0.5
July 2009
E-258
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
models
NCo.i-o.oi: r- 0.45
Covariates: seasonal variation in
NCo.b-o. 1: r- 0.95
medication use or symptom prevalence,
meteorological factors (relative humidity,
NC2.B0.B: r- 0.92
temperature), weekend, Christmas
holidays
MC2.B0.01: r- 1.00
Season: winter
PM10: r- 0.91
Dose-response Investigated? No
NO2: r- 0.69
Statistical Package: NR
CO: r- 0.66
Lags Considered: 0,1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
SO2: r- 0.60
9,10, mov avg calculated from same day
and preceding days
Same day, IQR- 2, OR - 1.09 (1.02-1.17)
5-day mean IQR- 21, OR- 1.28(1.18-
1.39)
14-day mean, IQR - 17, OR- 1.49(1.38-
1.61)
Association between the prevalence of
wheezing and MC0.1-0.5
Same day, IQR - 21, OR - 1.01 (0.94-
1.08)
5-day mean, IQR - 21, OR - 1.08 (0.99-
1.17)
14-day mean, IQR - 17, OR- 1.05 (0.96-
1.15)
Reference: von Klot et al. (2002,
034706)
Period of Study: September 1996 to
March 1997 (winter)
Location: Erfurt, Germany
Outcome: Asthma symptoms (wheezing,
shortness of breath at rest, waking up
with breathing problems, or coughing
without having a cold) and Asthma
medication (inhaled short-acting B2-
agonists, inhaled long-acting B2- agonists,
inhaled corticosteroids, cromolyn sodium,
theophylline, oral corticosteroids, and N-
acetylcysteine)
Age Groups: Adults, mean-59.0 yrs and
range —37-77 yrs
Study Design: panel study
N: 53 adult asthmatics
Statistical Analyses: Logistic regression
models
Covariates: seasonal variation in
medication use or symptom prevalence,
meteorological factors (relative humidity,
temperature), weekend, Ohristmas
holidays
Season: Winter
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 0,1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
9,10, mov avg calculated from same day
and preceding days
Pollutant: MC2.B0.01
Averaging Time: 10 min intervals
Mean (SD): 30.3
Percentiles:
25th: 13.5
50th(Median): 24.6
75th: 41.3
Range (Min, Max): (3.6-133.8)
Copollutant (correlation):
PMio-2.b: r- 0.52
NCo.e-o.i: r- 0.45
NC2.B0.B: r- 0.94
MCo.b-o.i: r- 1.00
NCo.i-o.oi: r- 0.45
PM10: r- 0.94
NO?: r- 0.68
CO: r- 0.65
SO2: r- 0.62
NC Increment: 1 IQR
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Association between the prevalence of
inhaled B2- agonist use and MC0.01-2.5
Same day, IQR - 28, OR - 0.96 (0.90-
1.04)
5-day mean, IQR- 26, OR- 1.10(1.01-
1.20)
14-day mean, IQR - 20, OR- 1.03 (0.95-
1.12)
Reference: von Klot et al. (2002,
034706)
Period of Study: September 1996 to
March 1997 (winter)
Location: Erfurt, Germany
Outcome: Asthma symptoms (wheezing,
shortness of breath at rest, waking up
with breathing problems, or coughing
without having a cold) and Asthma
medication (inhaled short-acting B2-
agonists, inhaled long-acting B2- agonists,
inhaled corticosteroids, cromolyn sodium,
theophylline, oral corticosteroids, and N-
acetylcysteine)
Age Groups: Adults, mean-59.0 yrs and
range —37-77 yrs
Study Design: panel study
N: 53 adult asthmatics
Statistical Analyses: Logistic regression
models
Covariates: seasonal variation in
medication use or symptom prevalence,
meteorological factors (relative humidity,
temperature), weekend, Christmas
holidays
Pollutant: NCo.1 -0.01
Averaging Time: 10 min intervals
Mean (SD): 173001cm3
Percentiles:
25th: 9286
50th(Median): 16940
75th: 24484
Range (Min, Max): (3272-46195)
Unit (i.e./yg/m3): 1/cm3
Copollutant (correlation):
PMio-2.b: r- 0.41
NCo.e-o.i: r- 0.55
NC2.B0.B: r- 0.34
MCob-o i: r- 0.45
NC Increment: 1 IQR
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Association between the prevalence of
inhaled B2- agonist use and NC0.01-0.1
Same day, IQR- 15000, OR - 0.97 (0.90-
1.04)
5-day mean, IQR - 10000, OR - 1.11
(1.01-1.21)
14-day mean, IQR - 7700, OR - 1.08
(0.96-1.21)
Association between two pollutants,
jointly in one model, and the Outcomes
Inhaled short-acting B2- agonist use
NCo.i-o.oi OR- 1.07 (0.97-1.18)
MCob-oi: OR- 1.07 (0.98-1.18)
Inhaled corticosteroid use
July 2009
E-259
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Season: winter
MC2.B0.01: r- 0.45
NCo.i-o.oi OR- 1.01 (0.87-1.18)
Dose-response Investigated? No
PM10: r- 0.51
MCob-oi: OR- 1.53 (1.39-1.69)
Statistical Package: NR
NO?: r- 0.66
Wheezing
Lags Considered: 0,1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
CO: r- 0.66
NCo.i-o.oi OR - 1.12(1.01-1.24)
9,10, mov avg calculated from same day
and preceding days
SO2: r- 0.36
MCob-oi: OR- 1.02 (0.92-1.12)
Association between the prevalence of
inhaled corticosteroid use and NCO.01-0.1
Same day, IQR- 15000, OR- 1.07 (1.00-
1.15)
5-day mean, IQR - 10000, OR - 1.22
(1.12-1.33)
14-day mean, IQR - 7700, OR - 1.45
(1.29-1.63)
Association between the prevalence of
wheezing and NCo.i-o.oi
Same day, IQR- 15000, OR - 0.94 (0.86-
1.01)
5-day mean, IQR - 10000, OR - 1.13
(1.03-1.24)
14-day mean, IQR - 7700, OR - 1.27
(1.13-1.43)
Association between the prevalence of
respiratory symptoms and NCo.i-o.oi
Attack of shortness of breath and
wheezing
Same day, IQR- 15000, OR- 1.01 (0.91-
1.12)
5-day mean, IQR - 10000, OR - 1.08
(0.96-1.21)
14-day mean, IQR - 7700, OR - 1.26
(1.08-1.48)
Walking up with breathing problems
Same day, IQR- 15000, OR- 1.04 (0.96-
1.13)
5-day mean, IQR - 10000, OR - 1.09
(0.99-1.19)
14-day mean, IQR - 7700, OR - 1.26
(1.13-1.41)
Shortness of breath
Same day, IQR- 15000, OR - 0.98 (0.90-
1.06)
5-day mean, IQR - 10000, OR - 1.09
(0.99-1.19)
14-day mean, IQR - 7700, OR - 1.24
(1.11-1.40)
Phlegm
Same day, IQR- 15000, OR- 1.01 (0.94-
1.09)
5-day mean, IQR - 10000, OR - 1.11
(1.02-1.21)
14-day mean, IQR - 7700, OR - 1.11
(0.99-1.25)
Cough
Same day, IQR- 15000, OR- 1.07 (0.98-
1.16)
July 2009
E-260
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
& Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
5-day mean, IQR- 10000, OR - 1.17
(1.07-1.28)
14-day mean, IQR - 7700, OR - 1.20
(1.06-1.35)
Reference: von Klot et al. (2002,
034706)
Period of Study: September 1996 to
March 1997 (winter)
Location: Erfurt, Germany
Outcome: Asthma symptoms (wheezing,
shortness of breath at rest, waking up
with breathing problems, or coughing
without having a cold) and Asthma
medication (inhaled short-acting B2-
agonists, inhaled long-acting B2- agonists,
inhaled corticosteroids, cromolyn sodium,
theophylline, oral corticosteroids, and N-
acetylcysteine)
Age Groups: Adults, mean-59.0 yrs and
range —37-77 yrs
Study Design: panel study
N: 53 adult asthmatics
Statistical Analyses: Logistic regression
models
Covariates: seasonal variation in
medication use or symptom prevalence,
meteorological factors (relative humidity,
temperature), weekend, Christmas
holidays
Season: winter
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 0,1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
9,10, mov avg calculated from same day
and preceding days
Pollutant: NCo.bo i
Averaging Time: 10 min intervals
Mean (SD): 2005 I cm3
Percentiles:
25th: 958
50th(Median): 1610
75th: 2767
Range (Min, Max): (291-6700)
Unit (i.e./yg/m3): 1/cm3
Copollutant (correlation):
PMio-2.b: r- 0.50
NCo.i-o.oi: r- 0.55
NC2.b-o.b: r- 0.76
MCob-o.i: r- 0.95
MC2.B0.01: r- 0.93
PM10: r- 0.85
NO2: r- 0.75
CO: r- 0.79
SO2: r- 0.51
NC Increment: 1 IQR
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Association between the prevalence of
inhaled B2- agonist use and NCobo.i
Same day, IQR - 1800, OR - 0.99 (0.92-
1.05)
5-day mean, IQR- 1500, OR- 1.10
(1.03-1.19)
14-day mean, IQR- 1450, OR- 0.95
(0.86-1.05)
Association between the prevalence of
inhaled corticosteroid use and NCo.b-oi
Same day, IQR- 1800, OR- 1.06 (0.99-
1.14)
5-day mean, IQR - 1500, OR - 1.23
(1.14-1.32)
14-day mean, IQR- 1450, OR- 1.51
(1.37-1.67)
Association between the prevalence of
wheezing and NCobo.i
Same day, IQR - 1800, OR- 1.00 (0.93-
1.07)
5-day mean, IQR - 1500, OR - 1.08
(1.00-1.17)
14-day mean, IQR- 1450, OR- 1.11
(1.00-1.24)
Reference: von Klot et al. (2002,
034706)
Period of Study: September 1996 to
March 1997 (winter)
Location: Erfurt, Germany
Outcome: Asthma symptoms (wheezing,
shortness of breath at rest, waking up
with breathing problems, or coughing
without having a cold) and Asthma
medication (inhaled short-acting B2-
agonists, inhaled long-acting B2- agonists,
inhaled corticosteroids, cromolyn sodium,
theophylline, oral corticosteroids, and N-
acetylcysteine)
Age Groups: Adults, mean-59.0 yrs and
range —37-77 yrs
Study Design: panel study
N: 53 adult asthmatics
Pollutant: NC2.B0.B
Averaging Time: 10 min intervals
Mean (SD): 21.41 cm3
Percentiles:
25th: 5.6
50th(Median): 13.0
75th: 31.6
Range (Min, Max): (0.9-127.6)
Unit (i.e./yg/m3): 1/cm3
NC Increment: 1 IQR
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Association between the prevalence of
inhaled B2- agonist use and NC2.E-0.E
Same day, IQR - 26, OR - 0.99 (0.93-
1.05)
5-day mean, IQR - 22, OR- 1.09 (1.01-
1.17)
14-day mean, IQR - 17, OR- 1.08(1.02-
1.15)
Association between the prevalence of
inhaled corticosteroid use and NC2.E-0.E
Same day, IQR - 26, OR- 1.13(1.06-
1.21)
5-day mean, IQR - 22, OR- 1.28 (1.19-
1.37)
14-day mean, IQR - 17, OR- 1.44(1.36-
1.53)
Association between the prevalence of
wheezing and NC2.E-0.E
Same day, IQR - 26, OR - 1.03 (0.95-
1.10)
5-day mean, IQR - 22, OR - 1.05 (0.97-
1.13)
J4^da^eanJQR^J7;J)R^_J;03J0;S^
Statistical Analyses: Logistic regression Copollutant (correlation):
models
PM10-2.B: r- 0.48
NCo.i-o.oi: r- 0.34
Covariates: seasonal variation in
medication use or symptom prevalence,
meteorological factors (relative humidity, |\|Cob-o 1: r- 0.76
temperature), weekend, Christmas
holidays MCob-o i: r- 0.92
Season: winter MC2.B-0.01: r— 0.94
Dose-response Investigated? No PM10: r- 0.88
Statistical Package: NR NO2: r- 0.54
Lags Considered: 0,1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, CO: r- 0.46
9,10, mov avg calculated from same day
and preceding days r" "-66
July 2009
E-261
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
1.10)
Reference: von Klot et al. (2002,
034706)
Period of Study: September 1996 to
March 1997 (winter)
Location: Erfurt, Germany
Outcome: Asthma symptoms (wheezing,
shortness of breath at rest, waking up
with breathing problems, or coughing
without having a cold) and Asthma
medication (inhaled short-acting B2-
agonists, inhaled long-acting B2- agonists,
inhaled corticosteroids, cromolyn sodium,
theophylline, oral corticosteroids, and N-
acetylcysteine)
Age Groups: Adults, mean-59.0 yrs and
range —37-77 yrs
Study Design: panel study
N: 53 adult asthmatics
Statistical Analyses: Logistic regression
models
Covariates: seasonal variation in
medication use or symptom prevalence,
meteorological factors (relative humidity,
temperature), weekend, Christmas
holidays
Season: winter
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 0,1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
9,10, mov avg calculated from same day
and preceding days
Pollutant: PM102 E
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 10.3
Percentiles:
25th: 2.9
50th(Median): 6.9
75th: 14.6
Range (Min, Max): (-8.7-64.3)
Copollutant (correlation):
NCo.i-o.oi: r- 0.41
NCo.5-0.1: r- 0.50
NC2.b-o.b: r- 0.48
MCobo.i: r- 0.51
MC2.B0.01: r- 0.52
PM10: r- 0.67
NO2: r- 0.45
CO: r- 0.42
SO2: r- 0.28
PM Increment: 1 IQR
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Association between the prevalence of
inhaled B2- agonist use and PM 10-2.6
Same day, IQR- 12, OR - 1.01 (0.95-
1.06)
5-day mean, IQR - 11, OR - 1.01 (0.94-
1.09)
14-day mean, IQR - 6.7, OR - 0.92 (0.86-
1.00)
Association between the prevalence of
inhaled corticosteroid use and PM10-2.E
Same day, IQR- 12, OR - 1.03(0.98-
1.08)
5-day mean,IQR- 11,OR- 1.12(1.04-
1.20)
14-day mean, IQR - 6.7, OR - 1.27 (1.18-
1.37)
Association between the prevalence of
wheezing and PM10 2.5
Same day, IQR- 12, OR- 0.97(0.91-
1.02)
5-day mean, IQR - 11, OR - 1.06 (0.98-
1.15)
14-day mean, IQR - 6.7, OR - 1.05 (0.96-
1.15)
Reference: Ward et al. (2002, 025839)
Period of Study: 1997 (two 8-week
periods)
Outcome: Change in PEF (peak
expiratory flow), self reported respiratory
symptoms (same day cough, illness, short
of breath, waking up at night with cough
Location: Birmingham and Sandwell, UK or w'leeze' wheeze)
Age Groups: 9 year olds
Study Design:
Time-series panel study
N: 162 children from 5 schools
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression
(PEF),
Logistic regression (respiratory
symptoms)
Covariates: Trend, temperature,
schooldays (yes/no)
Season: Winter (Jan 13-Mar 10)
Summer (May 19- July 14)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: Nr
Lags Considered: Lag 0, lag 1, lag 2, lag
3, 7-day moving avg
Pollutant: PM2.6
PM Increment:
Averaging Time: 24-h
Winter: 12.3 //g|m3
Mean (SD):
Summer: 6.3 //g|m3
Winter: 12.7 //g|m3
Mean (PEF l/min) [Lo
Summer: 12.3 //g|m3
lag:
Range (Min, Max):
Winter morning:
Winter: 4, 37
0.80 [-1.97, 3.67]
Summer: 5, 28
lagO
PM Component:
0.62 [-2.22, 3.54]
Total mass
lag 1
Monitoring Stations:
¦0.86 [-4.32, 2.47]
5 stations near the 5 schools
lag 2
Copollutant (correlation):
¦2.47 [-5.30, 0.36]
Winter:
lag 3
PMio(r—0.93)
¦4.07 [-10.60, 2.42]
NO2 (r—0.88)
7-day mean
0s (r—-0.83)
Winter afternoon:
Summer:
0.95 [-2.22,4.23]
HNOs (r — 0.81)
lagO
¦0.99 [-4.69, 2.72]
, Upper CI]
July 2009
E-262
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
¦1.60 [-5.18, 2.01]
lag 2
¦3.45 [-6.53 to -0.25]
lag 3
1.00 [-11.47,13.56]
7-day mean
Summer morning:
-1.49 [-3.65, 0.67]
lag 0
0.21 [-2.12,2.55]
Iag1
2.50(0.28, 4.72]
Iag2
3.41 [1.40,5.44]
Iag3
3.901-2.53,10.33]
7-day mean
Summer afternoon:
¦0.49 [-2.43,1.45]
lag 0
-0.78 [-2.72,1.16]
lag 1
0.57 [-1.35, 2.49]
lag 2
0.16 [-1.85, 2.17]
lag 3
¦0.08 [-5.43, 5.27]
7-day mean
Winter morning in atopy/recent
wheezing subgroup:
-0.0721-0.527,0.383]
lag 0
-0.271 [-0.701,0.159]
lag 1
0.127 [-0.354,0.608]
lag 2
0.055 [-0.391,0.501]
lag 3
Winter morning in no atopy or recent
wheezing subgroup:
0.126 [-0.413,0.666]
lag 0
0.193 [-0.340,0.728] lag 1
-0.170 [-0.788, 0.447]; Iag2
-0.314[-0.846,0.216]
lag 3
July 2009
E-263
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Winter morning in subgroup with
parental atopy/recent wheezing:
0.187 [-0.008,0.382]
lag 0
-0.006 [-0.207,0.195]
lag 1
-0.011 [-0.226,0.204]
lag 2
-0.037 [-0.228,0.154]
lag 3
Winter morning in subgroup without
parental atopy/recent wheezing:
0.026 [-0.341 ,0.395]
lag 0
0.068 [-0.307,0.444]
lag 1
-0.099 [-0.535,0.335]
lag 2
-0.252 [-0.615,0.110]
lag 3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Cough:
Winter: 0.98 [0.80,1.18]
lag 0
0.95[0.77,1.17]
lag 1
1.02[0.83,1.24]
lag 2
1.01 [0.83,1.23]
lag 3
1.31 [0.82,2.09]
7-day mean
Summer: 1.13 [1.04,1.22]
lag 0
1.04 [0.94,1.13]
lag 1
0.94 [0.87,1.02]
lag 2
0.89(0.82,0.96]
lag 3
0.81 [0.62,1.06]
7 day mean
Illness:
Winter: 1.17 [1.05,1.32]
lag 0
July 2009
E-264
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
1.07[0.95,1.23]
lag 1
1.16[1.01,1.35]
lag 2
1.01 [0.90,1.16]
lag 3
1.57[1.15, 2.13]
7-day mean
Summer: 1.02 [0.91,1.13]
lag 0
1.00(0.89,1.13]
lag 1
0.96(0.85,1.07]
lag 2
0.97(0.86,1.09]
lag 3
0.68(0.41,1.13]
7-day mean
Shortness of breath:
Winter: 1.07 [0.94,1.24]
lag 0
0.98[0.84,1.13]
lag 1
0.96(0.82,1.13]
Iag2
0.91 (0.79,1.07]
lag 3
0.82(0.58,1.18]
7-day mean
Summer: 1.04 (0.90,1.20]
lag 0
1.08(0.93,1.25]
lag 1
0.97(0.84,1.13]
lag 2
0.93(0.81,1.08]
lag 3
1.16(0.76,1.77]
7-day mean
Wake at night with cough/wheeze:
Winter: 1.10 (0.96,1.26]
lag 0
1.05(0.90,1.22]
lag 1
0.98(0.83,1.13]; lag 2
July 2009
E-265
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
0.94[0.81,1.09]; lag 3
0.93[0.66,1.32]
7-day mean
Summer: 0.93 [0.78,1.10]
lag 0
0.81 [0.67, 0.98]
lag 1
0.91 [0.77,1.09]
lag 2
0.97(0.83,1.13]
lag 3
1.04 [0.57,1.90]
7-day mean
Wheeze:
Winter: 0.98 [0.83,1.16]
lag 0
0.90(0.75,1.05]
lag 1
1.00(0.83,1.20]
lag 2
1.13(0.95,1.35]
lag 3
1.02 [0.68,1.57]; 7-day mean
Summer: 1.02 [0.88,1.19]
lag 0
0.98(0.84,1.16]
lag 1
0.87(0.74,1.02]
lag 2
0.85[0.72,0.99]
lag 3
0.96(0.51,1.81]
7-day mean
Reference: Ward et al. (2002, 025839)
Outcome: Change in PEF (peak
expiratory flow), self reported respiratory
Pollutant: Sulfate
PM Increment:
Period of Study: 1997 (two 8-week
symptoms (same day cough, illness, short
Averaging Time: 24-h
Winter: 4.8 //g|m3
periods)
Location: Birmingham and Sandwell, UK
of breath, waking up at night with cough
or wheeze, wheeze)
Mean (SD):
Summer: 3.1 //g|m3
Age Groups: 9 year olds
Winter: 2.4/yg/m3
Mean (PEF l/min) [Lower CI, Upper CI]
Study Design:
Summer: 3.8/yg/m3
la
Time-series panel study
Range (Min, Max):
Winter morning:
N: 162 children from 5 schools
Winter: 0.8,14.9
¦1.75 [-4.00, 0.50]
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression
Summer: 1.1, 7.8
lagO
(PEF),
PM Component:
¦0.91 [-3.44,1.62]
Logistic regression (respiratory
S04
lag 1
symptoms)
Monitoring Stations:
¦0.62 [-3.16,1.91]
Covariates: Trend, temperature,
schooldays (yes/no)
2 stations
lag 2
July 2009
E-266
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Season: Winter (Jan 13-Mar 10)
Summer (May 19- July 14)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: Nr
Lags Considered: Lag 0, lag 1, lag
3, 7-day moving avg
¦1.82 [-4.27, 0.64]
lag 3
¦3.22 [-8.03,1.58]
7-day mean
Winter afternoon:
0.99 [-1.58, 3.55]
0.79 [-2.42,4.00]
lag 1
¦1.89 [-4.99,1.21]
lag 2
-1.73 [-4.69,1.23]
lag 3
¦1.96 [-13.35, 9.42]
7-day mean
Summer morning:
-0.72 [-3.27,1.82]
lag 0
¦1.69 [-4.28, 0.90]
1.35 [-1.27, 3.97]
Iag2
3.38 [1.03, 5.72]
Iag3
2.98[-4.17,10.13]
7-day mean
Summer afternoon:
¦0.32 [-2.81, 2.17]
lag 0
0.84 [-1.63, 3.30]
lag 1
¦0.08 [-2.61,2.44]
lag 2
¦0.25 [-2.69, 2.19]
lag 3
¦2.20 [-9.51,5.12]
7-day mean
Winter morning in atopy/recent
wheezing subgroup:
0.200 [-0.755,1.156]
lag 0
-0.219[-1.318,0.881]
lag 1
-0.431 [-1.526,0.664]; lag 2
1.200 [0.095, 2.305]
July 2009
E-267
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
lag 3
Winter morning in no atopy or recent
wheezing subgroup:
-0.6131-1.714,0.488]
lag 0
-0.174 [-1.423,1.075]
lag 1
0.006 [-1.243,1.253]
lag 2
-1.080 [-2.308,0.148]
lag 3
Winter morning in subgroup with
parental atopy/recent wheezing:
0.457 [0.003,0.910]
lag 0
0.0781-0.503,0.660]
lag 1
-0.102 [-0.656,0.452]
lag 2
0.002 [-0.609,0.613]
lag 3
Winter morning in subgroup without
parental atopy/recent wheezing:
-0.622 [-1.379,0.136]
lag 0
-0.272[-1.147,0.602]
lag 1
-0.138 [-1.005,0.728]
lag 2
-0.496 [-1.359,0.367]
lag 3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Cough:
Winter: 1.01 [0.84,1.20]
lag 0
1.02[0.85,1.24]
lag 1
0.99[0.82,1.20]
lag 2
0.86(0.71,1.05]
lag 3
0.78(0.53,1.14]
7-day mean
Summer: 1.08 [0.98,1.20]
lag 0
July 2009
E-268
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
1.03[0.93,1.15]
lag 1
0.97[0.88,1.07]
lag 2' 0.90(0.82, 0.99]
lag 3
0.73(0.54,0.97]
7 day mean
Illness:
Winter: 1.06 [0.96,1.17]
lag 0
1.15(1.03,1.28]
lag 1
1.14(1.00,1.28]
lag 2
1.04 (0.92,1.18]
lag 3
1.30(1.00,1.66]
7-day mean
Summer: 0.98 (0.86,1.11]
lag 0
0.97(0.84,1.12]
lag 1
1.01 (0.88,1.16]
lag 2' 0.95(0.84,1.09]
lag 3
0.72(0.46,1.12]
7-day mean
Shortness of breath:
Winter: 0.96 [0.85,1.07]
lagO: 0.98 [0.86,1.12]
lag 1
0.94 [0.82,1.07]
Iag2
0.93 [0.81,1.08]
lag 3
0.80(0.59,1.07]
7-day mean
Summer: 0.95 [0.80,1.14]
lag 0
1.07[0.89,1.28]
lag 1
1.04 [0.87,1.24]
lag 2
0.94 [0.80,1.12]
lag 3
July 2009
E-269
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
10.58 [0.33,1.04]
7-day mean
Wake at night with cough/wheeze:
Winter: 0.97 [0.87,1.08]
lag 0
1.01 [0.89,1.15]
lag 1
1.00(0.88,1.14]; lag 2
0.93[0.82,1.07]; lag 3
0.79(0.59,1.05]
7-day mean
Summer: 0.95 [0.78,1.16]
lag 0
0.81 [0.67, 0.99]
lag 1
0.93(0.76,1.13]
lag 2
0.87(0.72,1.05]
lag 3
0.77[0.41,1.48]
7-day mean
Wheeze:
Winter: 1.00 [0.87,1.15]
lag 0
0.96[0.82,1.13]
lag 1
0.88(0.75,1.04]
lag 2
1.12(0.95,1.32]
lag 3
0.83 [0.58,1.20]; 7-day mean
Summer: 0.97 [0.80,1.17]
lag 0
.09 [0.89,1.32]
lag 1
1.00[0.82,1.22]
lag 2
0.81 [0.69, 0.97]
lag 3
1.30[0.68, 2.50]
7-day mean
PM Increment: Winter: 6.7 /yglm3
Summer: 3.7 /yglm3
Mean (PEF l/min) [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Reference: Ward et al. (2002, 025839)
Period of Study: 1997 (two 8-week
periods)
Location: Birmingham and Sandwell, UK
Outcome: Change in PEF (peak
expiratory flow), self reported respiratory
symptoms (same day cough, illness, short
of breath, waking up at night with cough
or wheeze, wheeze)
Age Groups: 9 year olds
Pollutant: NO3
Averaging Time: 24-h
Mean (SD):
Winter: 3.6/yg/m3
July 2009
E-270
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Study Design: Time-series panel study
N: 162 children from 5 schools
Summer: 3.5/yg/m3
Range (Min, Max):
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression Winter: 0.1, 29.9
(PEF),
Logistic regression (respiratory
symptoms)
Covariates: Trend, temperature,
schooldays (yes/no)
Season: Winter (Jan 13-Mar 10)
Summer (May 19- July 14)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: Nr
Lags Considered: Lag 0, lag 1, lag
3, 7-day moving avg
Summer: 0.7,13.2
Monitoring Stations:
2 stations
Winter morning:
¦2.08 [-4.02 to-0.15]
lagO
¦0.64 [-2.87,1.59]
lag 1
0.71 [-1.69,3.11]
lag 2
¦1.38 [-3.61,0.84]
lag 3
¦0.92 [-5.32, 3.47]
7-day mean
Winter afternoon:
0.24 [-1.89,2.38]
-0.72 [-3.87, 2.43]
lag 1
¦1.37 [-5.11, 2.38]
lag 2
¦2.54 [-5.74,0.66]
lag 3
0.21 [-7.67,8.11]
7-day mean
Summer morning:
¦0.80 [-2.74,1.15]
lag 0
0.68[-1.31,2.67]
1.42 [-0.73,3.58]
Iag2
2.54 [0.48, 4.59]
Iag3
1.74 [-2.66, 6.13]
7-day mean
Summer afternoon:
-0.72 [-2.47,1.03]
lag 0
¦0.59 [-2.36,1.18]
lag 1
¦0.33 [-2.11,1.45]
lag 2
0.66 [-1.26, 2.58]
lag 3
0.47 [-3.36,4.29]
7-day mean
J/Vintenrioniint^^
July 2009
E-271
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
wheezing subgroup:
-0.036 [-0.627,0.555]
lag 0
0.142 [-0.573,0.857]
lag 1
0.000 [-0.760,0.759]
lag 2
0.689 [-0.061,1.439]
lag 3
Winter morning in no atopy or recent
wheezing subgroup:
-0.434 [-1.116,0.248]
lag 0
-0.201 [-1.002,0.600]
lag 1
0.154 [-0.703,1.010]
lag 2
-0.605 [-1.422,0.210]
lag 3
Winter morning in subgroup with
parental atopy/recent wheezing:
0.228 [-0.054,0.511]
lag 0
0.476 [0.060, 0.892]
lag 1
0.196 [-0.202,0.594]
lag 2
0.083 [-0.321,0.487]
lag 3
Winter morning in subgroup without
parental atopy/recent wheezing:
-0.482 [-0.952,-0.012]
lag 0
-0.276 [-0.846, 0.294]
lag 1
0.078[-0.520,0.675]
lag 2
-0.298 [-0.864, 0.268]
lag 3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Cough: Winter:
0.92 [0.80,1.07]
lag 0
0.91 [0.77, 1.07]
lag 1
July 2009
E-272
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
0.99[0.83,1.17]
lag 2
0.87[0.73,1.03]
lag 3
0.71 [0.52,0.97]
7-day mean
Summer:
1.05[0.97,1.13]
lag 0
1.01 [0.93,1.10]
lag 1
0.95(0.88,1.03]
lag 2
0.89(0.83,0.96]
lag 3
0.81 [0.68, 0.97]
7 day mean
Illness: Winter:
1.05[0.97,1.14]
lag 0
1.11 [1.01,1.22]
lag 1
1.13 [1.01,1.26]
lag 2
1.13 [1.04,1.26]
lag 3
1.13(0.92,1.38]
7-day mean
Summer:
0.97(0.87,1.09]
lag 0
0.98[0.87,1.10]
lag 1
0.95(0.85,1.06]
lag 2
0.94 [0.85,1.05]
lag 3
0.74[0.54,1.03]
7-day mean
Shortness of breath: Winter:
0.99(0.90,1.10]
lag 0
1.01 [0.90,1.13]
lag 1
0.93[0.82,1.05]
July 2009
E-273
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Iag2
0.98[0.86,1.13]
lag 3
0.85[0.67,1.08]
7-day mean
Summer:
1.04 [0.90,1.18]
lag 0
1.12[0.98,1.28]
lag 1
1.04 [0.90,1.20]
lag 2
0.90(0.79,1.03]
lag 3
1.06(0.78,1.43]
7-day mean
Wake at night with cough/wheeze:
Winter:
0.98(0.89,1.08]
lag 0
1.05(0.94,1.16]
lag 1
0.99(0.88,1.12]; lag 2
0.99(0.87,1.12]; lag 3
0.84 (0.67,1.05]
7-day mean
Summer:
0.94 (0.80,1.09]
lag 0
0.86(0.72,1.01]
lag 1
0.94 (0.79,1.11]
lag 2
0.92(0.79,1.07]
lag 3
0.95(0.62,1.47]
7-day mean
Wheeze: Winter:
0.98(0.87,1.10]
lag 0
1.00(0.87,1.14]
lag 1
0.89(0.77,1.03]
lag 2
1.11 (0.95,1.30]
July 2009
E-274
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
lag 3
0.80[0.61,1.07]
7-day mean
Summer:
1.01 [0.87,1.17]
lag 0
0.96(0.83,1.11]
lag 1
0.95(0.82,1.10]
lag 2
0.87(0.75,1.01]
lag 3
1.04 (0.67,1.60]
7-day mean
'All units expressed in //gfm3 unless otherwise specified.
July 2009
E-275
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
E.2.2. Respiratory Emergency Department Visits and Hospital
Admissions
Table E-12. Short-term exposure-respiratory-ED/HA-PMio
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Andersen et al. (2008,
189651)
1st page: 458
Period of Study: May 2001 - December
2004
Location: Los Angeles and San Dii
counties, California
Hospital Admissions/ED visits
Outcome (ICD-10):
RD, including chronic bronchitis (J41 -
42), emphysema (J43), other chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease (J44),
asthma (J45), and status asthmaticus
(J46).
Pediatric hospital admissions for
asthma (J45) and status asthmaticus
(J46).
Age Groups Analyzed: > 65 yrs (RD
combined), 5-18 years (asthma)
Study Design: Time series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM
Covariates: temperature, dew-point
temperature, long-term trend, seasonality,
influenza, day of the week, public
holidays, school holidays (only for 5 - 18
year olds), pollen (only for pediatric
asthma outcome)
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical package: R statistical
software (gam procedure, mgcv package)
Lags Considered: Lag 0 -5 days, 5-day
average (lag 0-4) for RD, and a 6-day
average (lag 0-5) for asthma.
Pollutant: PMio (/L/g|m3)
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD
median
IQR
99th percentile: 24 (14
21
16-29
72)
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation): NCtot:
r - 0.39
NC100: r - 0.28
NCa12: r - 0.02
Nca23: r - -0.12
NCa57: r - 0.45
Nca212:r - 0.63
PM2.6: r - 0.80
CO: r - 0.37
NO2: r - 0.35
NOx: r - 0.32
NOx curbside: r - 0.18
O3: r - -0.21
Other variables: Temperature: r - 0.12
Relative humidity: r - 0.05
PM Increment: 13 |Jg|m3 3 (IQR)
Relative risk (RR) Estimate [CI]:
RD hospital admissions (5 day
average, lag 0 -4), age 65+: One-
pollutant model: 1.06 [1.02 - 1.09]
Adj for NCtot: 1.05(1.01 - 1.10]
Adj for NCa212: 1.04 [0.98-1.11]
Asthma hospital admissions (6 day
avg lag 0 - 5), age 5 -18: One-pollutant
model: 1.02(0.93- 1.12]
Adj for NCtot: 1.01 [0.91 - 1.12]
Adj for NCa212: 0.94 [0.81 - 1.09]
Estimates for individual day lags reported
only in figure form (see notes):
Notes: Figure 2: Relative risks and 95%
confidence intervals per IQR in single day
concentration (0-5 day lag).
Summary of Figure 2: RD: Positive,
statistically or marginally significant
associations at Lag 2-5. Asthma: Wide
confidence intervals make interpretation
difficult. Positive associations at Lag 1,
2, 3, and 5.
Reference: Cheng et al. (2007, 093034)
Period of Study: 1996-2004
Location: Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Outcome (ICD-9: 480-486): Pneumonia
Age Groups: NR
Study Design: Case-crossover
N: 82,587 pneumonia hospital admissions
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Covariates: Temperature and humidity
on the same day
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: Cumulative lag period
up to 2 previous days
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (min-max):
77.01 (16.7-232)
Percentiles: 25%: 42.12
50%: 75.27
75%: 104.65
Monitoring Stations: 6
Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: 62.53/yg/m3 (IQR)
OR Estimate [CI]: Single Pollutant Model:
Temp>25°C: 1.21 [1.15,1.28]
Temp< 25°C: 1.57(1.50,1.65]
Two-Pollutant Model: Temp>25°C
Adj. for SO2: 1.21 [1.14,1.28]
Adj. for NO2:1.15 [1.07,1.24]
Adj. for CO: 1.10 [1.03,1.17]
Adj. for 0s: 0.96 [0.89,1.03]
Temp<25°C
Adj. for SO2: 1.56[1.48,1.65]
Adj. for NO2:1.09 [1.02,1.16]
Adj. for CO: 1.30 [1.22,1.39]
Adj. for 0s: 1.56 [1.48,1.65]
July 2009
E-276
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Reference: Chimonas and Gessner
(2007,093261)
Period of Study: January 1,1999-June
30, 2003
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Design & Methods
Outcome (ICD-9): Asthma (493.0-493.9)
Lower respiratory illness-LRI (466.1,
466.0, 480-487, 490,510-511)
Inhaled quick-relief medication
Steroid medication
Age Groups: < 20 years old
Study Design: Time series
N: 42,667 admissions
Statistical Analyses: GEE for
multivariable modeling
Covariates: Season, serial correlation,
year, weekend, temperature,
precipitation, and wind speed
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SPSS (dataset),
SAS (analysis)
Lags Considered: 1 day and 1 week
Concentrations'
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-hs and 1 week
Mean (min-max):
Daily: 27.6(2-421)
Weekly: 25.3 (5.0-116.0)
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: Daily PM2.6
~ - 0.25 (p< 0.01)
Weekly PM2.6
~ - 0.08 (p - 0.21)
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
RR Estimate [CI]:
Same Day
Outpatient Asthma: 1.006 [1.001,1.013]
Outpatient LRI: 1.001 [0.987,1.015]
Inpatient Asthma: 1.003 [0.922,1.091]
Inpatient LRI: 1.015(0.978,1.053]
Inhaled Steroid Prescriptions: 1.006
[0.996,1.011]
Quick-relief Medication: 1.018
[1.006,1.030]
Weekly (median increase)
Outpatient Asthma: 1.021 [1.004,1.038]
Outpatient LRI: 1.013(0.978,1.049]
Inpatient Asthma: 1.023 [0.948,1.104]
Inpatient LRI: 1.025 [0.981,1.072]
Inhaled Steroid Prescriptions: 0.989
[0.969,1.010]
Quick-relief Medication: 1.057
[1.037,1.077]
Reference: Chiu et al. (2008,191989)
Period of Study: 1996-2001
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Outcome: Hospital admissions for C0PD
Study Design: Time-series
Covariates: Temperature, humidity,
PMioand O3
Statistical Analysis: Poisson regression
Statistical Package: SAS
Age Groups: All
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean (SD) Unit:
Index Days: 111.68 ± 38.32//g|m3
Comparison Days: 55.43 ± 24.66//g|m3
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation): NR
All results refer to "dust storm days" and
can be found in Table 3
Reference: Chiu et al. (2009,190249)
Period of Study: 1996-2004
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Outcome: Hospital admissions for
pneumonia (ICD-9 480-486)
Study Design: Time-series
Covariates: Weather variables, day of
the week, seasonality, long-term time
trends
Statistical Analysis: Conditional logistic
regression
Statistical Package: SAS
Age Groups: All
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean Unit: 49.47 //g|m3
Range (Min, Max): 14.42, 234.91
Copollutant (correlation):
SO2: 0.50
NO?: 0.58
CO: 0.34
0s: 0.31
Increment: IQR
Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Temperature > 23° C: 1.11 (1.08-1.14)
Temperature < 23° C: 1.09 (1.07-1.11)
Adjusted for SO2
Temperature a 23° C: 1.10 (1.08-1.13)
Temperature < 23° C: 1.19 (1.17-1.22)
Adjusted for NO2
Temperature a 23° C: 0.90 (0.88-0.93)
Temperature < 23° C: 1.09 (1.07-1.12)
Adjusted for CO
Temperature a 23° C: 1.03 (1.00-1.05)
Temperature < 23° C: 1.07 (1.05-1.10)
Adjusted for O3
Temperature a 23° C: 1.05 (1.03-1.08)
Temperature < 23° C: 1.09 (1.07-1.11)
July 2009
E-277
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Erbas et al. (2005, 073849)
Period of Study: Jan 2000-Dec 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Hospital Admissions
Outcome (ICD-10): Asthma (J45, J46)
Age Groups: M5yrs
Study Design: Time series
N: 8955 asthma cases
Statistical Analyses: GAM, GEE (if
autocorrelation was present in residuals)
Covariates: Temp and humidity
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 0,1, 2 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 1 h
Mean (SD):
Western: 2.99 (2.11)
10th percentile: 13.67
90th percentile: 48.00
Inner Melbourne: 4.54 (2.65)
10th percentile: 15.63
90th percentile: 59.73
South/Southeastern: 1.13 (1.18)
10th percentile: 12.00
90th percentile: 36.05
Eastern: 3.61 (2.39)
10th percentile: 16.00
90th percentile: 51.05
Combined: 30.07 (10.55-112.33)
SD - 15.27
10th percentile: 16.00
90th percentile: 50.51
Monitoring Stations: Data obtained
from an air quality simulation model
(TAPM) by CSIR0 Atmospheric Research
Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: Increase from 10th to
90th percentile
RR Estimate [CI]:
Same day lag
Western: NR
Inner Melbourne: 1.17 [1.05,1.31]
South/Southeastern: 1.14 [0.95,1.33]
Eastern: 1.09(1.01,1.18]
Notes: All other lags NR
July 2009
E-278
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Farhat et al. (2005, 089461)
Period of Study: Aug 1996—Aug 1997
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Hospital Admissions and Emergency
Room Visits
Outcome (ICD-9): Lower respiratory
tract diseases (466, 480-519) including
pneumonia or bronchopneumonia (480-
486), asthma (493), bronchiolitis (466)
Age Groups: < 13 yrs
Study Design: Time series
N: 43,635
Statistical Analyses: GAM, Poisson
regression, Pearson correlation
Covariates: Time, temperature, humidity,
weekday
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: S-Plus
Lags Considered: 0-7 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (min-max):
62.6 (25.5-186.3)
SD - 26.6
IQr - 30
N - 396
Monitoring Stations: 13
Copollutant (correlation): SO2: r - 0.69
NO2: r - 0.83
O3: r - 0.35
CO: r - 0.72
(all p < 0.05)
Additional correlations:
Rel humidity: r - -0.55
Min temp: r - -0.44
(both p < 0.05)
PM Increment: 30/yg/m3 (IQR)
RR Estimate [CI]:
Lower respiratory tract disease
5-day moving avg
Copollutant model:
NO?: 2.1 [-7.1,11.3]
SO2: 16.5(10.5,22.6]
O3: 10.1 [5.0,15.2]
CO: 14.1 [8.1,20.2]
Multipollutant model: 5.2 [-4.6,15.1]
Pneumonia or bronchopneumonia
6-day moving avg
Copollutant model:
NO2: 14.81-3.8,33.4]
SO2: 14.8 [-0.3,30.0]; 0s: 16.2 [1.0,31.3]
CO: 17.6(0.4,34.8]
Multipollutant model: 5.23 [-16.2,26.6]
Asthma or bronchiolitis
2-day moving avg
Copollutant model:
NO2: -11.04 [-50.0,28.0]
SO2: 15.8[-7.8,39.3]
0s: 11.7[-10.4, 33.9]
CO: 12.4 [-14.8,39.7]
Multipollutant model: -15.5 [-61.2,30.2]
July 2009
E-279
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Fung et al. (2006, 089789)
Period of Study: 6/1/95-3/31/99
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Hospital Admission/ED
Outcome: Respiratory diseases (460-
519)
Age Groups: Age > 65
Study Design: Time series
N: 26,275 individuals admitted
Statistical Analyses: Poisson regression
(spline 12 knots), case-crossover
(controls +/7 d days from case date),
Dewanji and Moolgavkar (DM) method
Covariates: Long-term trends, day-of-
the-week effect, weather
Season: All year
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SPIus, R
Lags Considered: 0-7 d
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h Avg
Mean (SD): 13.31 (6.13)//g/m3
Range (Min, Max): (3.77,52.17)
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant (correlation): PMio:
PM2.6
r - 0.80
PMio 2.5
r - -0.11
CO
r - 0.46
Coh
r - 0.61
0s
r - -0.08
NO?
r - 0.54
SO?
r - 0.61
PM Increment:: 7.9 /yg/m3
Rr Estimate (65+ Years)
Dm Method:
1.014[0.998,1.029]
Lag 0
1.016[0.998,1.034]
3 D Avg
0.988(0.970,1.006]
5 D Avg
0.983(0.963,1.004]
7 D Avg
Time Series:
1.016[0.999,1.033]
Lag 0
1.015(0.996,1.035]
3 D Avg
1.009(0.987,1.032]
5 D Avg
1.009(0.983,1.036]
7 D Avg
Case-Crossover:
1.017(0.998,1.036]
Lag 0
1.015(0.993,1.037]
3 D Avg
1.008(0.984,1.033]
5 D Avg
1.003(0.976,1.031]
7 D Avg
Reference: Fung al. (2005, 093262) Hospital Admissions
Period of Study: Nov 1,1995-Dec 31,
2000
Location: London, Ontario
Outcome (ICD-9): Asthma (493) and all
other respiratory diseases (460-519)
Age Groups: < 65 yrs
65+ yrs
Study Design: Time series
N: 5574 respiratory admissions
Statistical Analyses: GAM with locally
weighted regression smoothers (LOESS)
Covariates: Maximum and minimum
temp, humidity, day of the week,
seasonal cycles, secular trends
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: S PIus
Lags Considered: Current to 3-day mean
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (min-max):
38.0 (5-248)
SD - 23.5
Monitoring Stations: 4
Copollutant (correlation): NO2:
r - 0.30
SO2: r - 0.24
CO: r - 0.21
O3: r - 0.53
COH: r - 0.29
PM Increment: 26/yg/m3
% Change in Daily Admission [CI]:
Age < 65
Current day mean: -0.9 [-6.8,5.4]
2-day mean: -1.3 [-8.5,6.6]
3-day mean: 1.9 [-6.5,11]
Age 65 +
Current day mean: 3.3 [-1.7,8.6]
2-day mean: 5 [-1.5,11.9]
3-day mean: 1.2 [-6.1,9.1 ]
July 2009
E-280
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Galan et al. (2003, 087408)
Period of Study: 1995-1998
Location: Madrid, Spain
Hospital Admissions
Outcome (ICD): Asthma (493)
Age Groups: all ages
Study Design: Time series
l\l: 555,153 at-risk
Statistical Analyses: GAM,
autoregressive Poisson regression
Covariates: temperature, relative
humidity, pollen, year, day of the week,
public holiday
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: S-Plus
Lags Considered: 0,1, 2, 3, and 4-day
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (min-max): 32.1 (11.2-108.6)
SD - 12.1
Monitoring Stations: 13
Copollutant (correlation): SO2:
r - 0.581
NO2: r - 0.717
O3: r - -0.188
Other variables: O.europaea\ r - -0.066
Plantagosp\ r - -0.202
Poaceae: r - -0.132
Urticaceae: r - -0.104
Temp: r - -0.122
Humidity: r - 0.119
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
RR Estimate [CI]:
Single-pollutant
Current-day lag: 1.011 (0.980-1.042)
1-day lag: 1.006 (0.976-1.037)
2-day lag: 1.008 (0.978-1.038)
3-day lag: 1.039 (1.010-1.068)
4-day lag: 1.027 (0.999-1.056)
Adjustment for pollen (PM10 3-day lag)
O. europaea\ 1.041 (1.011-1.071)
Plantago sp:. 1.046 (1.017-1.076)
Poaceae: 1.043 (1.015-1.073)
Urticaceae: 1.038 (1.009-1.068)
All four: 1.045(1.016-1.074)
Reference: Hajat et al. (2002, 030358)
Period of Study: 1/1992-12-1994
Location: London, England
Family Practice consultations
Outcome: Upper Resp Disease (excluding
allergic rhinitis) (460-3), (465), (470-5),
(478)
Age Groups: 0-14,
15-64, >65 yrs
Study Design: Time series
N: 268,718-295,740 registered patients
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
regression, GAM, LOESS smoothers,
default convergence criteria
Covariates: long term trends, pollen
counts, flu, meteorological variables
Season: All year
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SPLUS
Lags Considered: 2-3
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24-H
Mean (SD): 28.5 (13.7)//g/m3
Percentiles: 10th: 15.8
90th: 46.5
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: All Year: 18
Warm Season: 15
Cold Season: 20
% Change, Single Pollutant Models:
All Year: Ages 0-14: 2.0[-0.2, 4.2] Lag 3
Ages 15-64: 5.7(2.9, 8.6]
Lag 2
Ages >65:10.2[5.3,15.3] Lag 2
Warm Season: Ages 0-14: 1.1 [-2.4,4.8]
Lag 3
Ages 15-64: 6.0(2.7, 9.4]
Lag 2
Ages >65: 0.1 [-7.7, 8.5] Lag 2
Cold Season: Ages 0-14: 2.7(0.1, 5.5]
Lag 3
Ages 15-64: 3.6(1.0,6.4]
Lag 2
Ages >65: 18.9(11.7, 26.7] Lag 2
% Change, 2 Pollutant Models: 0-14
Yrs
PM10 wINO?: 3.8(1.6, 6.1]
PM10 wfOs: 1.8(-0.4, 3.9]
PM10 wI SO2: 2.0[-0.6,4.6]
15-65 Yrs
PM10 WINO2: 2.8(0.7, 4.9]
PM10 wfOs: 4.8(2.6,7.0]
PM10 wI SO2: 4.8(2.2,7.5]
> 65 Yrs
PM10 w| NO2: 4.6(0.5, 8.8]
PM10 wfOs: 10.7(5.7,16.0]
PM10 wI SO2: 10.6(4.5,17.1]
July 2009
E-281
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Hanigan et al (2008,
156518)
Period of Study: 1996-2005 (April-
November of each year)
Location: Darwin, Australia
Outcome: Cardiorespiratory Disease HA
(ICD 9: 390-519
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean (SD): 21.2 (8.2)
Range: 55.2
ICD 10:100-99 & J00-99)
Age Groups: NR
Study Design: time series
N: 8279 events
Statistical Analyses: poisson regression Copollutant: NR
Covariates: indigenous status,
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: R
Lags Considered: lags 0-3
Monitoring Stations: 2 (monitored &
modeled)
Co-pollutant Correlation
n/a
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Percent Change (Lower CI, Upper CI),
lag:
Total Respiratory: 4.81 (-1.04,11.01),
lag 0
Total Resp., Indigenous: 9.40 (1.04,
18.46), lag 0
Total Resp., Non-Indigenous: 3.14 (-2.99,
9.66), lag
Resp. Infection, Indigenous: 15.02 (3.73,
27.54), lag 3
Resp. Infection, Non-Indigenous: 0.67 (¦
7.55,9.61), lag 3
Asthma Indigenous: 16.27 (3.55, 40.17),
lag 1
Asthma Non-Indigenous: 8.54 (-5.60,
24.80), lag 1
figure 3. percent change in hospital
admissions per 10//gfm increase in F
PMio
Reference: Hanigan et al (2008,
156518)
Period of Study: 1996-2005 (April-
November of each year)
Location: Darwin, Australia
Hospital Admissions/ED visits
Outcome (ICD-9 or ICD-10):
Daily emergency hospital admissions for
total respiratory (ICD-9: 460 - 519
ICD-10: J00 - J99), asthma (ICD-9: 493
ICD-10: J45 - J47), C0PD (ICD-9: 490 -
492, 494 - 496
ICD-10: J40-J44, J47.J67), and
respiratory infections (ICD-9: 461 - 466, n,, ¦ ,.
480 -487,514 Other variables:
ICD-10: J00-J22).
Age Groups Analyzed: All
Study Design: Time series
N: 8,279 hospital admissions
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
generalized linear models
Covariates: indigenous status, time in
days, temperature, relative humidity, day
of the week, influenza epidemics, change
between ICD editions, holidays, yearly
population
Season: April - November (corresponding
to the dry season)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical package: R version 2.3.1
Lags Considered: lag 0 -3
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD
range): 21.2 (8.2
55.2)
Monitoring Stations: l\l/A (see notes)
Copollutant (correlation): NR
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Percent change [95% CI]:
Overall respiratory disease:
LagO: 4.81 [-1.04,11.01]
Lag 0 (indigenous people): 9.40 [1.04,
18.46]
Lag 0 (non-indigenous people): 3.14 [¦
2.99, 9.66]
In unstratified analyses, the subgroups of
respiratory infections, asthma, and C0PD
all had positive associations with PMio
Lag 0.
Asthma:
Lag 1 (indigenous people): 16.27
[-3.55
40.17]
Lag 1 (non-indigenous people): 8.54
[-5.60, 24.80]
Respiratory infections:
Lag 3 (indigenous people): 15.02 [3.73,
27.54]
Lag 3 (non-indigenous people)
0.67
[-7.55,9.61]
Notes:
Figure 3: Associations between
hospitalizations for non-indigenous and
indigenous people with estimated ambient
PMio.
Summary of Figure 3: Confidence
intervals were wide, but indigenous
people generally had stronger
associations with PMio than non-
indigenous people. Daily PMio exposure
levels were estimated for the population
of the city from visibility data using a
previously validated models.
July 2009
E-282
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Hapcioglu et al. (2006,
093263)
Period of Study: Jan 1,1997-Dec 31,
2001
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Hospital Admissions
Outcome (ICD-9): C0PD (ICD: NR)
Age Groups: NR
Study Design: Time series
N: 1586 patients
Statistical Analyses: Multiple stepwise
regression, Pearson correlation
Covariates: Humidity, temperature, and
pressure
Season: summer, autumn, winter, spring
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SPSS
Lags Considered: NR
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 1 month
Mean (SD): NR
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: NR
Correlation with COPD:
r - 0.28
p - 0.03
Adj for temp: r - 0.16
p - 0.23
Notes: RRs only provided for season, not
PM
Reference: Hwang and Chan (2002,
023222)
Period of Study: 1998
Location: Taiwan
Clinic visits
Outcome: LRI
466, 480-486 (acute bronchitis, acute
bronchiolitis, pneumonia)
Age Groups: 0-14yrs, 15-64, 65+ yrs
Study Design: Cluster analysis of small
study areas
N: 50 communities
Statistical Analyses: GLM to model
temporal patterns, hierarchical model to
obtain estimates across 50 communities
Covariates: day of week, temperature,
dew point, summer/Winter
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 0-2
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 H
Mean (SD): 58.9//gfm3 (14.0)
Range (Min, Max): 33.3, 83.1 //g|m3
PM Component:
Monitoring Stations: 59
Notes: Number Of Stations Estimated
From Figure.
Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: 10% Increase In PMio
(5.9/yg/m3)
Percent Change:
0-14
0.5% (-0.1,0.8] LagO
[-0.3, 0.3] Lag1
0.3 [0.0, 0.6] Lag2
15-64
0.6 [0.2, 0.9] LagO
0.2[-0.1,0.5] Lag 1
0.3 [0.0, 0.6] Lag2
65 +
0.8(0.4,1.1] LagO
0.3 [-0.1, 0.6] Lag1
0.5 [0.1, 0.8] Lag2
All Ages
0.5(0.2, N0.8] LagO
[-0.3, 0.3] Lag1
0.3 (0.0, 0.6] Lag2
July 2009
E-283
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Jaffe et al. (2003, 041957)
Period of Study: 7/1/91-6/30/96
Location: Cincinnati, Cleveland,
Columbus, Ohio
ED visits
Outcome (ICD10): Asthma (493)
Age Groups: Age 5-34 years
Study Design: Time-series
N: 4,416 recipients
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
regression, GAM
Covariates: City, day of week, wk, yr,
minimum temperature, dispersion
parameter
Season: June-August only
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 0-3 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-H
Mean (SD): Cincinnati: 43.0(16.4)
Cleveland: 60.8(28.4)
Columbus: 37.4(16.3)
Range (Min, Max): Cincinnati: (16,90)
Cleveland: (12,183)
Columbus: (7,87)
Monitoring Stations: 3
Copollutant (correlation): Cincinnati:
PMio
0s
r - 0.42
NO?
r - 0.36
SO?
r - 0.31
Cleveland: PMio
0s
r - 0.42
NO?
r - 0.34
SO?
r - 0.29
Columbus: PMio
0s
r - 0.51
NO?
r - Na
SO?
r - 0.42
PM Increment: 50/yg/m3
% Change
Asthma
Cincinnati: -22%[-49,-19] Lag 3
Cleveland: 12%[0,27] Lag 2
Columbus: 32%[-6,-85] Lag 3
Ar Estimate [Lower Ci, Upper Ci]
Lag:
Asthma
Cincinnati: PMio: Nr
Cleveland: PMio: 1.32
Columbus: PMio: 3.62
Notes: dose response was investigated
by assessing the relationship between
odds of ed visit by quintile of PMio.
Results are displayed in figure, "no
consistent effects for all three cities were
observed for PMio." Rate ratios were also
reported for each city.
July 2009
E-284
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Jalaludin et al. (2004, Doctor Visits
056595)
Outcome (ICD- NR): Respiratory
Period of Study: Feb 1 -Dec 31,1994 symptoms (wheeze, dry cough, and wet
cough), asthma medication use, and
Location: Sydney, Australia doctor visits for asthma
Age Groups: Primary school children
Study Design: Longitudinal cohort study
N: 125 children
Statistical Analyses: GEE logistic
regression models
Covariates: Temperature, humidity, daily
pollen count, daily alternaria count,
number of h spend outdoors, season
Season: Autumn (Feb-Apr), winter (May-
Aug), springfsummer (Sep-Dec)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 0-2 days
Pollutant: PMio
PM Increment: IQR (/L/g|m3)
Averaging Time: 24 h
Same day: 12.0
Mean (SD): 22.8(13.8)
1 -day lag: 12.02
Monitoring Stations: 4
2-day lag: 12.25
Copollutant (correlation):
2-day avg: 11.15
0s: r - 0.13
5-day avg: 10.23
NO2: r - 0.26
OR Estimate [CI]:
Other variables:
Doctor Visits for Asthma
Temp: r - 0.04
Same day: 1.11 [1.04,1.19]
Humidity: r - -0.29
1-day lag: 1.10(1.02,1.19]
Total pollen: r - 0.04
2-day lag: 1.15 [1.06,1.24]
Alternaria: r - 0.04
2-day avg: 1.11 [1.03,1.20]
5-day avg: 1.14(0.98,1.31]
Prevalence of Doctor Visits for
Asthma:
Quartile 1: 0.50 (mean PM - 12.4)
Quartile 2: 0.38 (mean PM - 17.2)
Quartile 3: 0.65 (mean PM - 23.0)
Quartile 4: 0.63 (mean PM - 38.3)
Notes: ORs and prevalence are also
provided for wheeze, dry cough, wet
cough, inhaled (32-agonist use, and
inhaled corticosteroid use. None were
statistically significant.
July 2009
E-285
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Johnston et al. (2007,
155882)
Period of Study: 2000, 2004, 2005
(April-November of each year)
Location: Darwin, Australia
Hospital Admissions/ED visits
Outcome (ICD-10):
All respiratory conditions (J00 - J99),
including asthma (J45 - 46), C0PD (J40
- J44), and respiratory infections (J00 -
J22).
Age Groups Analyzed: All
Study Design: Case-crossover
N: 2466 emergency admissions
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Covariates: weekly influenza rates,
temperature, humidity, days with rainfall
> 5mm, public holidays, school holiday
periods (for respiratory conditions only)
Season: April - November (dry season)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical package: NR
Lags Considered: 0-3 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Median (IQR, 10"1 - 90"1 percentile,
range):
17.4 (13.6-22.3
10.3-27.7
1.1-70.0)
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation): NR
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
OR Estimate [95% CI]: All respiratory
conditions: Lag 0: 1.08 [0.98 - 1.18]
Lag 0 (indigenous): 1.17 [0.98 - 1.40]
COPD: Lag 0: 1.21 [1.0-1.47]
Lag 0 (indigenous): 1.98 [1.10 - 3.59]
Asthma: Lag 0: 1.14 [0.90 - 1.44]
Asthma + COPD: Lag 0:1.19 [1.03 -
1.38]
Notes: Figure 1: Adjusted OR and 95%
CI for hospital admissions for all
respiratory conditions per 10 //gfm3 rise
in PMio for the same day and lags up to 3
days, overall and stratified by indigenous
status.
Summary of Figure 1 results:
Marginally significant positive association
at Lag 0 in overall study population.
Larger marginally significant positive
association among indigenous people.
Figure 2: OR and 95% CI for hospital
admissions for COPD. Summary of
Figure 2 results: Marginally significant
positive associations at Lag 0 and Lag 1
in overall study population and among
non-indigenous people. Large, statistically
significant positive association at Lag 0
for indigenous people, with smaller, non-
significant positive associations at Lag 1
and Lag2.
Figure 3: OR and 95% CI for hospital
admissions for asthma.
Summary of Figure 3 results: Positive,
non-significant (sometime marginally
significant) associations at Lag 0, Lag 2,
and Lag 3 for overall population and
indigenous status strata.
Figure 4: OR and 95% CI for hospital
admissions for respiratory infections.
Summary of Figure 4 results: Negative
associations at Lag 2 and Lag 3 in all
population strata.
July 2009
E-286
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Kim et al. (2007, 092837)
Period of Study: 2002
Location: Seoul, Korea
Ed Visits
Outcome (ICD10): Asthma (J45), (J46)
Age Groups: All Ages
Study Design: Cass-Crossover
N: 92,535 Visits
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
Logistic Regression, Relative Effect
Modification (Rem)
Covariates: Time Trend, Season, Daily
Mean Temperature, Relative Humidity, Air
Pressure. Sep As Modifier Of Air Pollution
Asthma Visit Association.
Season: All Year
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: Nr
Lags Considered: 0-2 Days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 8-H
Mean (SD): Daily Concentration: 67.6
(39.0) //g/m3
Relevant Exposure Term (Difference
Between Concentration On Event Day
And Mean Of Concentrations On Control
Days): 26.0(19.7)
Percentiles: 50th(Median): Daily
Concentration: 61.9
Relevant Exposure Term: 21.6
Range (Min, Max): Daily Concentration:
(4.9, 302.0)
Relevant Exposure Term: (0.0,143.1)
Monitoring Stations: 3
Copollutant: Nr
PM Increment: 47.4//g/m3
Rr Estimate For Asthma (Stratified By
Sep):
Individual Level Sep:
Quintile 1-1.06[1.02,1.09]
Quintile 2-1.07[1.04,1.10]
Quintile 3-1.06(1.03,1.10]
Quintile 4-1.03(0.99,1.07]
Quintile 5-1.10[1.05,1.14]
Regional Level Sep:
Quintile 1-1.04(0.99,1.10]
Quintile 2-1.03(1.00,1.07]
Quintile 3-1.05(1.03,1.08]
Quintile 4-1.06(1.02,1.10]
Quintile 5-1.09(1.06,1.13]
Total-1.06(1.04,1.08], 3D Ma
Notes: Relative Effect Modification (Rem)
Estimates Presented In Paper.
Reference: Ko et al. (2007, 091639)
Period of Study: 1/2000-12/2004
Location: Hong Kong, China
Ed Visits
Pollutant: PMio
PM Increment: 10 //g/m3
Outcome (ICD-9): C0PD: chronic
bronchitis (491), emphysema (492),
chronic airway obstruction (496)
Averaging Time: 24-H
Mean (SD): 50.1(23.9)//g/m3
Rr Estimate
C0PD:
Age Groups: All Ages
Percentiles: 25th: 31.9
1.003(1.000,1.005]
Study Design: Time Series
50th(Median): 44.5
Lag 0
N: 15 hospitals, 119,225 admissions
75th: 64.1
1.005(1.002,1.007]
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
regression, gam with stringent
convergence criteria, aphea2 protocol.
Covariates: time trend, season,
temperature, humidity, other cyclical
factors, day, day of wk, holidays
Season: All year, interactions with
season tested
Range (Min, Max): (13.6,172.2)
Monitoring Stations: 14 Stations
Copollutant (correlation): PMio:
SO?
r - 0.436
NO?
Lag 1
1.010(1.007,1.012]
Lag 2
1.011(1.008,1.013]
Lag 3
1.008(1.006,1.011]
Dose-response Investigated? No
r - 0.229
Lag 4
Statistical Package: Splus 4.0
0s
1.007(1.004,1.009]
Lags Considered: 0-5 days
r - 0.421
Lag 5
PM2.6
1.005(1.002,1.008]
r - 0.952
Lag 0-1
1.011(1.008,1.014]
Lag 0-2
1.016(1.013,1.019]
Lag 0-3
1.020(1.017,1.024]
Lag 0-4
1.024(1.021,1.028]
Lag 0-5
July 2009
E-287
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ko et al. (2007, 091639)
Period of Study: 1/2000-12/2004
Location: Hong Kong, China
Hospital Admission
Outcome (ICD-9): Asthma (493)
Age Groups: All, 0-14,15-56, 65 +
Study Design: Time series
N: 69,716 admissions, 15 hospitals
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
regression, with GAM with stringent
convergence criteria.
Covariates: Time trend, season,
temperature, humidity, other cyclical
factors
Season: All year, evaluated effect of
season in analysis
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SPLUS 4.0
Lags Considered: 0-5 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h
Mean (SD): 52.5(27.1)//g/m3
Percentiles: 25th: 30.9
50th(Median): 47.1
75th: 68.8
Range (Min, Max):
(13.4,198.9)
Monitoring Stations:
14 stations
Copollutant (correlation): PMio:
SO?
r - 0.436
NO?
r - 0.761
0s
r - 0.600
PM2.6
r - 0.956
PM Increment: 10.0 //g/m3
RR Estimate: Asthma (Single-pollutant
model): 1.006(1.003,1.010]
lag 0
1.005(1.002,1.009]
lag 1
1.005(1.002,1.009]
lag 2
1.008(1.005,1.012]
lag 3
1.006(1.002,1.009]
lag 4
1.006(0.999,1.006]
lag 5
1.008(1.004,1.012]; lag 0-1
1.012(1.008,1.016]
lag 0-2
1.015(1.011,1.019]
lag 0-3
1.018(1.013,1.022]
lag 0-4
1.019(1.015,1.024]
lag 0-5
Asthma by age group
0-14: 1.023(1.015,1.031]
lag 0-5
14-65: 1.014(1.006,1.022]
lag 0-5
>65: 1.015(1.009,1.022]
lag 0-4
Asthma-Effect of season: 1.148(1.051,
1.245] lag 0-5
Reference: Kuo et al. (2002, 036310)
Period of Study: 1 Yr
Location: central Taiwan
Hospital Admissions
Outcome (ICD-NR): Asthma
Age Groups: 13-16 yrs
Study Design: Cohort
N: 12,926
Statistical Analyses: Multiple logistic
regression, Pearson correlation
Covariates: Sex, age, residential area,
level of parents' education, number of
cigarettes smoked by smokers in the
family, incense burning, frequency of
physical activity
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: NR
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 1 h
Mean (min-max): NR
Range: (54.1-84.3)
Monitoring Stations: 8
Copollutant: Values NR
Notes: Author states that a positive
correlation was found between NO2 and
PMio
PM Increment: NR
OR Estimate:
PMio < 65.9//g/m3—referent
PMio >65.9//g/m3
Crude OR: 0.837
Adj OR: 0.947
95% CI: (0.640,1.401)
July 2009
E-288
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Langley-Turnbaugh et al.
(2005, 093269)
Period of Study: 2000-2001
Location: Portland, Bridgeton, and
Presque Isle, Maine
Hospital Admissions
Outcome (ICD-9): Asthma (493xx)
Age Groups: 0-18 yrs, 19 + yrs
Study Design: Time series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: NR
Covariates: NR
Season: Winter, spring, summer, fall
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: NR
Notes: Hospital admissions were used to
determine seasonality of asthma
admissions so that PM components from
those time periods could be analyzed
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: NR
Mean (min-max): NR
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: NR
RR Estimate [CI]: NR
Notes: Portland filters contained more
PM in the winter (Jan) and Bridgeton
filters contained more PM in the spring
(May)
study analyzed metal components of
PMio (Mn, Cu, Pb, As, V, Ni, Al)
Clinical data shows a strong peak in fall
and weaker peaks in Jan and May for
asthma admissions
Reference: Lee et al. (2002, 034826) Hospital Admissions
Period of Study: 12/1/1997-12/31/1999 Outcome (ICD10): Asthma, J45, J46,
Location: Seoul, Korea
Age Groups: Children < 15 years
Study Design: Time-Series
N: 822 d, 6,436 admissions
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
regression, GAM, LOESS smoothers.
Covariates: Days of the week,
temperature, humidity
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 0-5, 0-1 moving
averages for 1-2, 2-3, and 3-4 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h
Mean (SD): 64.0 (31.8)/yg/m3
Percentiles: 25th: 40.5 /yg/m3
50th(Median): 59.1 /yg/m3
75th: 80.9/yg/m3
Range (Min, Max): NR
Monitoring Stations: 27
Notes: Copollutant (correlation): PMio-
SO?: 0.585
PM 10-NO2: 0.738
PMio-Os: 0.106
PM10-CO: 0.598
PM Increment: IQR: 40.4/yg/m3
RR Estimate:
Single Pollutant:
1.07 (1.04,1.11) lag 1
Two pollutant models:
+SO2: 1.05 (1.01,1.09) lag 1
+NO2: 1.03 (0.99,1.07) lag 1
+O3: 1.06 (1.03,1.10) lag 1
+C0: 1.04 (1.00,1.08) lag 1
Three pollutant models:
+O3 + CO: 1.02 (0.98,1.06), lag 1
Four pollutant models:
+0s + CO +SO2:1.02 (0.98,1.06), lag 1
Five pollutant model:
1.016(0.975,1.059) lag 1
Notes: Investigated the association
between outdoor air pollution and asthma
attacks in children < 15 yrs.
July 2009
E-289
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Lee et al. (2006, 090176)
Period of Study: 1/1997-12/2002
Location: Hong Kong, China
Hospital Admission
Outcome: Asthma (493)
Age Groups: < 18 years
Study Design: Time series
N: 26,663 asthma admissions for asthma
and 5821 admissions for influenza
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
regression, GAM
Covariates: Temperature, atmospheric
pressure, relative humidity
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS 8.02
Lags Considered: 0-5
Notes: Controls were admissions for
influenza ICD9 487
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-hs
Mean (SD): 56.1 (24.2)
Percentiles: 25th: 37.3
50th(Median): 51.1
75th: 70.7
Monitoring Stations: 10
Notes: Copollutant (correlation): PMio-
PM2.6: 0.90
PM10-SO2: 0.39
PM10-NO2: 0.80
PM10-O3: 0.60
PM Increment: IQr - 33.4
Percent Increase:
Single pollutant model:
4.97 [2.96, 7.03], lag 0
5.71 [3.78,7.68], lag 1
6.40 [4.51,8.32], lag 2
7.25 [5.38, 9.16], lag 3
7.45 [5.58, 9.35], lag 4
5.96 [4.11,7.85], lag 5
Multipollutant model (SO2, CO, NO2, O3)
3.67(1.52,5.86] Iag4
Reference: Lin et al. (2005, 087828)
Period of Study: 1998-2001
Location: Toronto, North York, East
York, Etobicoke, Scarborough, and York
(Canada)
Hospital Admissions
Outcome (ICD-9): Respiratory infections
including laryngitis, tracheitis, bronchitis,
bronchiolitis, pneumonia, and influenza
(464,466,480-487)
Age Groups: 0-14 yrs
Study Design: Bidirectional case-
crossover
N: 6782 respiratory infection
hospitalizations
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression (Cox proportional
hazards model)
Covariates: Daily mean temp and dew
point temp
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS 8.2 PHREG
procedure
Lags Considered: 1-7 day averages
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (min-max):
20.41 (4.00-73.00)
SD - 10.14
Monitoring Stations: 4
Copollutant (correlation): PM2.6:
r - 0.87
PMio2.5: r - 0.76
CO: r - 0.10
SO2: r - 0.48
NO2: r - 0.54
O3: r - 0.54
PM Increment: 12.5/yg/m3
OR Estimate [CI]:
Adjusted for weather
4 day avg: 1.22(1.10,1.34]
6 day avg: 1.25(1.11,1.40]
Adj for weather and other gaseous
pollutants
4 day avg: 1.14 [0.99,1.32]
6 day avg: 1.20 [1.01,1.42]
Notes: OR's were also categorized into
"Boys" and "Girls," yielding similar results
Reference: Lin et al, (2008,126812)
Period of Study: 1991-2001
Location: New York State, US
Outcome: Respiratory hospital
admissions (ICD-9 466, 490-493, 496
Study Design: Time-series
Covariates: Demographic
characteristics, PMio, meteorological
conditions, day of the week, seasonality,
long term trends and different lag periods
Statistical Analysis: GAM and case-
crossover design at the regional level and
Bayesian hierarchical model at the state
level
Pollutant: O3 (PMio is secondary)
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean (SD) Unit: 19.56 (10.92)//g/m3
Range (Min, Max): 1.0, 90.00
Copollutant (correlation): Given in
Figure 3
All PMio results are given in Figure 3
Age Groups: Children 0-17 years
July 2009
E-290
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Lin et al. (2002, 026067)
Period of Study: Jan 1,1981 -Dec 31,
1993
Location: Toronto
Hospital Admissions
Outcome (ICD-9): Asthma (493)
Age Groups: 6-12 yrs
Study Design: Uni- and bi directional
case-crossover (UCC, BCC) and time-
series (TS)
N: 7,319 asthma admissions
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression, GAM
Covariates: Maximum and minimum
temp, avg relative humidity
Season: Apr-Sep, Oct-Mar
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 1-7 day averages
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 6 days (predicted daily
values)
Mean (min-max):
30.16(3.03-116.20)
SD - 13.61
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation): PM2.6:
r - 0.87
PMio2.5: r - 0.83
CO: r - 0.38
SO?: r - 0.44
NO2: r - 0.52
O3: r - 0.44
PM Increment: 14.8/yg/m3
RR Estimate [CI]:
Adj for weather and gaseous pollutants
BCC 5 day avg: 0.99 [0.90,1.09]
BCC 6 day avg: 1.01 [0.90,1.12]
TS 5 day avg: 1.03(0.95,1.11]
TS 6 day avg: 1.02(0.94,1.11]
Boys-adj for weather
UCC 1 day avg: 1.10(1.04,1.17]
UCC 2 day avg: 1.10 [1.02,1.17]
BCC 1 day avg: 1.04 [0.98,1.09]
BCC 2 day avg: 1.01 [0.95,1.08]
TS 1 day avg: 1.03 [0.99,1.07]
TS 2 day avg: 1.01 [0.96,1.05]
Girls-adj for weather
UCC 1 day avg: 1.07 [0.99,1.16]
UCC 2 day avg: 1.15 [1.04,1.26]
BCC 1 day avg: 0.99 [0.92,1.06]
BCC 2 day avg: 1.03 [0.95,1.12]
TS 1 day avg: 0.99 [0.94,1.04]
TS 2 day avg: 1.02(0.96,1.08]
Notes: The author also provides RR using
UCC, BCC, and TS analysis for female
and male groups for days 3-7, yielding
similar results
Reference: Linares et al. (2006, 092846) Outcome: Respiratory system diseases
460-519, bronchitis 460-496, pneumonia
Period of Study: Jan 1995-Dec 2000
Location: Madrid, Spain
480-487
Age Groups: < 10 years
Study Design: Time series
N: — 15,000 admissions, 2192 days
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
regression, dummy variables to adjust for SO2: 0-532
season and weather
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-hs
Mean (SD): 33.4//gfm3, (13.7)
Range (Min, Max): 6,109//gfm:l
Monitoring Stations: 24
Notes: Copollutant (correlation): PMio-
Covariates: Temperature, difference in
barometric pressure, relative humidity,
pollen counts, influenza epidemics
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: S-Plus 2000
Lags Considered: 0-13
PMio-Os:-0.289
PMio-NOx: 0.721
PM10-PJO2: 0.711
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
RR Estimate
Bronchitis
1.09 [1.01,1.16] lag 2
AR% Estimate
Bronchitis
7.9 [CI NR] Iag2
Notes: Only statistically significant
relative and attributable risks were
presented by the authors.
The authors conducted multivariate
modeling using a linear term to represent
PMio. They also report an apparent
estimated PMio effect threshold of
60 /yglm3, based on examination of a
scatter plot of respiratory emergency
hospital admissions and PMio levels.
July 2009
E-291
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Luginaah, et al. (2005,
057327)
Period of Study: Apr 1995-Dec 2000
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Hospital Admission/ED:
admission
Outcome: All respiratory: 460-519
Age Groups: All, 0-14,15-64, and >65
Study Design: Times-series, bi-
directional case-crossover
N: 4214 admissions
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
regression, GAM wf stringent
convergence criteria or natural splines,
conditional logistic regression
Covariates: Age, sex
Maximum & minimum temperature,
change in barometric pressure from
previous day
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: S-Plus
Lags Considered: 1-3
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h maximum
Mean (SD): 50.6 ,(35.5)
Range (Min, Max):
9, 349
Monitoring Stations:
4
Notes: Copollutant (correlation): PMio-
NO?: 0.33
PM10-SO2: 0.22
PM10-CO: 0.21
PMio-Os: 0.33
PM Increment: Interquartile range (75th-
25th) 31 /yglm3
RR Estimates (Time Series)
All Age Groups Females
0.996[0.950,1.044], lag 1
1.015[0.963,1.069], lag 2
1.022(0.968,1.078], lag 3
All Age Groups Males
1.008[0.965,1.054], lag 1
1.036(0.986,1.089], lag 2
1.027(0.974,1.083], lag 3
RR Estimates (Case Crossover)
All Age Groups Females
1.034(0.974,1.098], lag 1
1.045(0.972,1.124], lag 2
1.054(0.970,1.145], lag 3
All Age Groups Males
0.997(0.942,1.056], lag 1
1.022(0.953,1.097], lag 2
1.008(0.930,1.092], lag 3
Notes: Results, stratified by age group
available in manuscript.
Reference: Martins et al. (2002,
035059)
Period of Study: May 1996-Sep 1998
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Hospital Admission/ED:
ER visits
Outcome (ICD10): Chronic lower
respiratory disease (CLRD) (40-47)
includes chronic bronchitis, emphysema,
other COPDs, asthma, bronchiectasia
Age Groups: > 64 years
Study Design: Time series
N: 712 for CLRD
1 hospital
Statistical Analyses: Poisson regression
GAM, LOESS smoothers, no mention of
stringent criteria
Covariates: Day of week, time minimum
temperature, relative humidity
Season: All
Statistical Package: S-Plus
Lags Considered: 2-7 3 d ma
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: daily
Mean (SD): 60.0//gfm3' (26.3)
Range (Min, Max):
22.8. 186.5/yg/m3
Unit (i.e./yg/m3):
/yg/m3
PM Component: None
Monitoring Stations:
12
Notes: Copollutant (correlation): PMio-
CO: 0.73
PMio- NO?: 0.83
PMio-SO?: 0.72
PMio-Os: 0.35
PM Increment: 1 /yglm3
Regression Coefficients (SE):
0.0024 (0.0023), 6 d ma
Notes: % Increase (SD) for ER visits per
2435/yglm3 (IQR) PMio (lag 6 d ma)
presented graphically in text.
July 2009
E-292
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Masjedi et al. (2003,
052100)
Period of Study: Sep 1997—Feb 1998
Location: Tehran, Iran
Hospital Admissions
Outcome (ICD-9): Acute asthma and
C0PD exacerbations (ICD: NR)
Age Groups: NR
Study Design: Time series
N: 355 patients
Statistical Analyses: Multiple stepwise
regression, autoregression method (time
series), Pearson correlation
Covariates: NR
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 3, 7, and 10 day mean
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (min-max):
108.41 (14.5-506.60)
SD - 59.55
Monitoring Stations: 3
Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: NR
Results:
Time-series analysis
Asthma: p - 0.002
p - 0.32
C0PD: (3 - 0.004
p - 0.02
Total Acute Resp Conditions: p - 0.006
p - 0.27
Correlation of 3-day mean
Asthma: r - -0.21
P - -0.16
p - 0.08
Correlation of weekly mean
Asthma: r - -0.27
P - -0.008
p - 0.12
Correlation of 10-day mean
Asthma: r - -0.38
P - -0.066
p - 0.089
Reference: McGowan et al. (2002,
030325)
Period of Study: Jun 1988—Dec 1998
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Hospital Admissions
Pollutant: PMio
Outcome (ICD-9): Pneumonia (480-487), Averaging Time: 24 h
acute respiratory infections (460-466),
chronic lung diseases (491-492, 494-
496), asthma (493)
Age Groups: < 15 yrs, 15-64, 65 +
Study Design: Time series
N: 20,938 admissions
Statistical Analyses: GAM with log link,
Linear Regression Model
Covariates: Wind speed, relative
humidity, temperature
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: S-PLUS
Lags Considered: 0-6 days
Mean (min-max):
25.17 (0-283)
SD - 25.49
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: 14.8 /yglm3 (IQR)
% Increase [CI]:
Respiratory Admissions (2-day lag)
0-14 yrs: 3.62 [2.34,4.90]
15-64 yrs: 3.39(1.85,4.93]
65+yrs: 2.86 [1.23,4.49]
All ages: 3.37 [2.34,4.40]
Overall
Acute respiratory infections: 4.53
[2.82,6.24]
Pneumonia/influenza: 5.32 [3.46,7.18]
Chronic lung diseases: 3.95 [2.15,5.75]
Asthma: 1.86 [0.48,.3.24]
Total Respiratory Admissions
Same day lag: 2.52 [1.49,3.55]
1-day lag: 2.56(1.53,3.59]
2-day lag: 3.37 [2.34,4.40]
3-day lag: 3.09 [2.06,4.12]
4-day lag: 3.13(2.10,4.16]
5-day lag: 3.21 [2.18,4.24];
6-day lag: 3.09 [2.06,4.12]
July 2009
E-293
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Medina-Ramon et al (2006,
087721)
Period of Study: 1986-99
Location: 36 US Cities
Outcome: 490-496, except 493 (COPD),
480-487 (Pneumonia)
Age Groups: 65 + (US Medicare
beneficiaries)
Study Design: Case crossover
N: 578,006 COPD admissions
1,384,813 Pneumonia admissions
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression, Meta-analysis using
REML random effects models
Covariates: Mean and variance of daily
summer apparent temperature index, %
65+ living in poverty,% households with
central air-conditioning mortality rate for
emphysema among 65+(surrogate for
smoking history), % PMio from traffic
Season: WarmfMay -Sepnd ColdfOct-
Apr)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
STATA
Lags Considered: 0-1 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h avg
Mean (SD): 30.4//gfm3 (5.1)
Monitoring Stations: at least one per
city
Notes: PMio measurements made every
2, 3 or 6 days depending on the city.
Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
% change [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
COPD warm season
0.81 (0.22,1.41) at lag 0
1.47(0.93,2.01) at lag 1
COPD cold season
0.06(-0.40,0.51) at lag 0
0.10(-0.30,0.49) at lag 1
Pneumonia warm season
0.84 (0.50,1.19) at lag 0
0.79(0.45,1.13) at lag 1
Pneumonia cold season
0.30(0.07,0.53) at lag 0
0.14 (-0.17,0.45) at lag 1
Reference: Meng et al., (2007, 093275)
Period of Study: Nov 2000-Sep 2001
Location: Los Angeles and San Dii
counties, California
Outcome (ICD-NR): Poorly controlled
asthma defined as (1) daily or weekly
asthma symptoms or (2) at least 1 ED
visit or hospitalization due to asthma over
the past 12 months
Age Groups: > 18 yrs
Study Design: Time series
N: 1609 asthma patients
Statistical Analyses: Logistic regression
Covariates: Age, sex, race/ethnicity,
poverty level, insurance status, smoking
behavior, employment, asthma medication
use, and county
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: NR
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (25-75th percentile): NR
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant (correlation): PM2.6:
r - 0.84
0s: r - -0.72
NO2: r - 0.83
CO: r - 0.42
Other variables:
Traffic: r - 0.14
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
OR Estimate [CI]:
All Adults: 1.08 [0.82,1.43]
18-64 yrs: 1.14(0.84,1.55]
65+: 0.84 [0.41,1.73]
Men: 0.72(0.42,1.21]
Women: 1.38(0.99,1.94]
Exposure above 44.01 //g|m3 (annual
concentration)
All Adults: 1.56 [0.96,2.52]
18-64 yrs: 1.40 [0.81,2.41]
65+: 2.23 [0.60,8.27]
Men: 0.80 [0.27,2.41]
Women: 2.06 [1.17,3.61]
Notes: This study focused more on the
relation between poorly controlled asthma
and traffic density.
July 2009
E-294
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Middleton et al. (2008,
156760)
Period of Study: 1995 - 1998, 2000 -
2004
Location: Nicosia, Cyprus
Hospital Admissions/ED visits
Outcome (ICD-NR):
Hospital admissions for all respiratory
disease (ICD-10: J00 - J99).
Age Groups Analyzed: All, also
stratified by age (<15 vs. >15 years)
Study Design: Time series
N: Statistical Analyses:
additive Poisson models
Covariates: seasonality, day of the
week, long- and short-term trend,
temperature, relative humidity
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical package: STATA SE 9.0, and
the MGCV package in the R software (R
2.2.0)
Lags Considered: lag 0 -2 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD
median
5% - 95%
range):
Cold: 57.6 (52.5
50.8
20.0 - 103.0
5.0 - 1370.6)
Warm: 53.4 (50.5
30.7
32.0 - 77.6
18.4- 933.5)
Monitoring Stations: 2
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Other variables:
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3, and across
quartiles of increasing levels of PMio
Percentage increase estimate [CI]: All
age/sex groups (Lag 0): All admissions:
0.85 (0.55,1.15)
Respiratory (all): 0.10 (-0.91,1.11)
Respiratory (cold months): -0.33 (-1.47,
0.82)
Respiratory (warm months): 1.42 (-0.42,
3.31)
CVD +RD: 0.56 (-0.21,1.34)
Nicosia residents (Lag 0): Respiratory
(all): 0.25(-0.84,1.36)
Respiratory (cold months): -0.22 (-1.45,
1.02)
Respiratory (warm months): 1.80 (-0.22,
3.85)
CVD +RD: 0.38(-0.47,1.23)
Males (Lag 0): All admissions: 0.96
(0.54,1.39)
Respiratory (all): -0.06 (-1.37,1.26)
Respiratory (cold months): -0.16 (-1.76,
1.46)
Respiratory (warm months): 1.10
(-1.47,3.74)
CVD +RD: 0.63(-0.34,1.62)
Females (Lag 0): All admissions: 0.74
(0.31,1.18)
Respiratory (all): 0.39 (-1.21, 2.02)
Respiratory (cold months): -0.26 (-2.18,
1.70)
Respiratory (warm months): 3.27 (-0.00,
6.65)
CVD +RD: 0.59 (-0.68,1.87)
Aged < 15 years (Lag 0): All
admissions: 0.47 (-0.13,1.08)
Respiratory (all): -0.35 (-1.77,1.08)
Respiratory (cold months): -0.31 (-2.02,
1.42)
Respiratory (warm months): -0.59 (-3.53,
2.45)
Aged > 15 years (Lag 0): All
admissions: 0.98 (0.63,1.33)
Respiratory (all): 0.59 (-0.87, 2.07)
Respiratory (cold months): 0.02 (-1.76,
1.83)
Respiratory (warm months): 3.89 (1.05,
6.80)
July 2009
E-295
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Moore et al, 2008
Period of Study: 1983-2000
Location: California's South Coast Air
Basin
Outcome: Hospital admissions for
asthma (ICD-9 493)
Study Design: Time-series
Covariates: Income, demographic and
residential variables
Statistical Analysis: HRMSM
Age Groups: Children ages 0-19 years
Pollutant: 03 (PM10 secondary)
Averaging Time: Quarterly
Mean (SD) Unit: NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation):
1 hr 0a: 0.52
8hr O3: 0.46
24hr NO?: 0.53
24hr CO: 0.36
24hr SO2: 0.13
Results given are for O3
Reference: Nascimento et al. (2006,
093247)
Period of Study: May 1, 2000-Dec 31,
2001
Location: Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil
Hospital Admissions
Outcome (ICD-10): Pneumonia (J12-J18)
Age Groups: 0-10 yrs
Study Design: Time series
N: 1265 admissions
Statistical Analyses: GAM, Poisson
regression
Covariates: Temperature, humidity
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: S-Plus, SPSS
Lags Considered: 0-7 days
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (min-max):
40.2(3.4-196.6)
SD - 26.9
Monitoring Stations: 2
Copollutant (correlation): SO2: r -
O3: r - 0.09
Other variables:
Admissions: r - 0.21
Temp: r - -0.14
Notes: All p < 0.05
PM Increment: 24.7 /yglm3
Regression coefficients (SE):
Same day: -0.00053 (0.00125)
1-day lag: 0.00029 (0.00057)
2-day lag: 0.00089 (0.00069)
3-day lag: 0.00122 (0.00053)*
0.30 4-day lag: 0.00126 (0.00055)*
5-day lag: 0.00098 (0.00071)
6-day lag: 0.00035 (0.00056)
7-day lag:-0.00067 (0.00123)
*p< 0.05
Notes: Percent increase over all lag days
is displayed in Fig 2
Reference: Neuberger et al. (2004,
093249)
Period of Study: 1999-2000 (1 yr
period)
Location: Vienna and Lower Austria
Hospital Admissions
Outcome (ICD-9): Bronchitis,
emphysema, asthma, bronchiectasis,
extrinsic allergic alveolitis, and chronic
airway obstruction (490-496)
Age Groups: 3.0-5.9 yrs
7-10 yrs
65 +
Study Design: Time series
N: 366 days (admissions NR)
Statistical Analyses: GAM
Covariates: SO2, NO, NO2, O3,
temperature, humidity, and day of the
week
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: S-Plus 2000
Lags Considered: 0-14 days
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24 h
Maximum daily mean:
Vienna: 105
Rural area: NR
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Log Relative Rate Estimate (p-value):
Vienna
Male: 2 day lag - 4.217 (0.030)
Association with tidal lung function:
P - -1.067 (p-value - 0.241)
Notes: Effect parameters with significant
coefficients for respiratory health
included: male sex, allergy, asthma in
family, and traffic for Vienna and age,
allergy, asthma in family, and passive
smoking for the rural area. Effect
parameters with significant coefficients
for log asthma score were allergy,
asthma in family, and rain for Vienna and
allergy, asthma in family, and passive
smoking for the rural area.
July 2009
E-296
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Oftedal et al. (2003,
055623)
Period of Study: 1995-2000
Location: Drammen, Norway
Hospital Admissions
Outcome: All Respiratory (460-517)
Age Groups: All
Study Design: Time-series
N: —4,458 admissions
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
regression, GAM wf stringent
convergence criteria
Covariates: Temperature, humidity,
influenza epidemics, summer and
Christmas vacation
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: S-Plus
Lags Considered: 2-3
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-hs
Mean (SD): 16.8//gfm3, (10.2)1994-
1997
16.5/yg|m3, (10.3) 1998-2000
16.6 ,/yg|m3 (10.2) total period
PM Component: Benzene, formaldehyde,
toluene
Monitoring Stations:
NR
Notes: Copollutant (correlation):
Correlation between pollutants ranged
from -0.47-0.78 with the exception of
the VOCs studied
Notes: Benzene, formaldehyde and
toluene also evaluated
PM Increment: IQr - 11.04
RR Estimate
1.035 [0.990,1.083] 1994-1997
0.992 [0.948,1.037] 1998-2000
1.021 [0.990,1.053] 1994-2000
2 Pollutant Model
PMio w/benzene: 1.01 (0.978,1.043)
Reference: Peel et al. (2005, 056305)
Period of Study: Jan 1993-Aug 2000
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
ED visits
Outcome: Asthma (493, 786.09)
C0PD (491,492, 496)
URI (460-466, 477)
Pneumonia (480-486)
Age Groups: All ages. Secondary
analyses conducted by age group: 0-1, 2-
18, >18
Study Design: Time series
N: 31 hospitals
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GEE for
URI, asthma and all RD
Poisson GLM for pneumonia and C0PD)
Covariates: Avg temperature and dew
point, pollen counts
Season: All (secondary analyses of warm
season)
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: SAS 8.3, S-Plus
2000
Lags Considered: 0-7 d , 3 d ma, 0-13 d
unconstrained distributed lag
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h avg
Mean (SD): 27.9 (12.3)//g/m3
Percentiles: 10th: 13.2
90th: 44.7
Monitoring Stations:
"Several"
Copollutant (correlation): 8 h 0:i:
r - 0.59
1 h NO?: r - 0.49
1 h CO: r - 0.47
1 h SO?: r - 0.20
24-h PM2.6: 0.84
24 h PMio2.5: r - 0.59
24 h UF: r - -0.13
Components: r ranged from 0.42-0.74
PM Increment: PMio: 10/yg/m3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
All Respiratory Outcomes:
1.013(1.004-1.021), 3 d ma
URI:
1.014 (1.004-1.025), 3 d ma
1.073 (1.048-1.099), 14-day dist. lag
Asthma:
1.009(0.996-1.022), 3 d ma
1.099(1.065-1.135), 14-day dist. lag:
Pediatric Asthma 2-18yrs):
1.016(0.998 -1.034)
Pneumonia:
1.011 (0.996-1.027), 3 d ma
1.087(1.044-1.132), 14-day dist. lag
C0PD:
1.018(0.994-1.043), 3 d ma
1.092(1.023-1.165), 14-day dist. lag
Notes: RRs obtained using AOS 1993-
2000, AOS 1998-2000 and ARIES data
compared. Infant (0-1 y) and pediatric (2-
18 y) asthma was associated more
strongly with PMio, PM2.6 and 0C than
adult asthma.
July 2009
E-297
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ren et al. (2006, 092824)
Hospital Admissions
Pollutant: PMio
PM Increment: NR
Period of Study: Jan 1,1996-Dec 31,
2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Outcome (ICD-9): Respiratory diseases
(460-519) excluding influenza (487.0-
487.8)
Age Groups: NR
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (min-max):
15.84 (2.5-60)
Coefficient Estimates:
Respiratory Hospital Admissions
Same day: -0.004296
Study Design: Time series
Monitoring Stations: 1
1-day lag:-0.002474
N: NR
Copollutant: NR
2-day lag:-0.004229
Statistical Analyses: GAM
"all statistically significant
Covariates: Day of week, relative
humidity, influenza outbreaks
Respiratory Emergency Visits
Same day: -0.000887
Season: NR
1-day lag: -0.004209
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
2-day lag: -0.003440
Statistical Package: S-Plus
Lags Considered: 0,1, and 2 days
Notes: Relative risks were provided in
graphical form (Fig 3)
Reference: (Sauerzapf et al„ 2009,
180082)
Period of Study: 3/1/2006-3/2/2007
Location: Norfolk, UK
Outcome: C0PD
Study Design: Case-Crossover
Covariates: Environmental factors and
Influenza
Statistical Analysis: Logistic regression
Statistical Package: SPSS 14
Age Groups: > 18 years
N: 1050 adult C0PD admissions
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean (SD) Unit:
Control: 19.87 (8.51)//g/m3
Case: 20.47 (9.27)/yg/m3
Range (Min, Max):
Control: 9.77-34.27
Case: 10.04-35.03
Copollutant (correlation): I
Increment: 10/yg/m3
Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Lag 0-7, unadjusted: 1.079 (0.980-1.188)
Lag 0-8, adjusted: 1.101 (0.988-1.226)
Lag 1-8, unadjusted: 1.056 (0.961-1.161)
Lag 1-8, adjusted: 1.054 (0.949-1.170)
Reference: Sinclair and Tolsma (2004,
088696)
Period of Study: 25 Months
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Outpatient Visits
Outcome: Asthma (493)
URI (460, 461, 462,463, 464, 465, 466,
477)
LRI (466.1, 480, 481,482, 483, 484,
485, 486).
Age Groups: < - 18 y, 18 + y (asthma)
All ages (URI//LRI)
Study Design: Times series
N: 25 months
260,000 to 275,000 health plan
members (August 1998-August 2000)
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GLM
Covariates: Season, Day of week,
Federal Holidays, Study Months
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated?: No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: Three 3 d moving
averages (0-2, 2-5, 6-8)
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h avg
Mean (SD): PMio mass-29.03/yg/m3
(11.61)
Monitoring Stations:
1
Notes: Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: 11.61 (1 SD)
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Child Asthma: 1.049 (S), lag 3-5 d
LRI: 1.074 (S), 3-5 d lag
Notes: Numerical findings for significant
results only presented in manuscript.
Results for all lags presented graphically
for each outcome (asthma, URI, and LRI).
July 2009
E-298
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Slaughter et al. (2005,
073854)
Period of Study: January 1995 through
June 2001
Location: Spokane, WA
Hospital Admissions and ED visits
Outcome: All respiratory (460-519)
Asthma (493)
C0PD (491,492,494,496)
Pneumonia (480-487)
Acute URI not including colds and
sinusitis (464, 466, 490)
Age Groups: All, 15+ years for C0PD
Study Design: Time series
N: 2373 visit records
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
regression, GLM with natural splines. For
comparison also used GAM with
smoothing splines and default
convergence criteria.
Covariates: Season, temperature,
relative humidity, day of week
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated?: No
Statistical Package: SAS, SPLUS
Lags Considered: 1 -3 d
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h avg
Range (90% of concentrations): 7.9-
41.9/yg/m3
Monitoring Stations:
1
Notes: Copollutant (correlation): PMio
PMir - 0.50
PM2.Br - 0.62
PMio 2.5 r - 0.94
COr - 0.32
Temperature r - 0.11
PM Increment: 25 /yglm3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
ER visits -- PMio
All Respiratory
Lag 1: 1.01 [0.99,1.04]
Lag 2: 1.01 [0.98,1.03]
Lag 3: 1.02 [0.99,1.04]
Acute Asthma
Lag 1:1.03 [0.98,1.07]
Lag 2: 1.01 [0.96,1.05]
Lag 3: 1.00 [0.95,1.04]
C0PD (adult)
Lag 1:1.00 [0.93,1.07]
Lag 2: 0.99 [0.92,1.06]
Lag 3: 1.02 [0.95,1.08]
Hospital Admissions - PMio
All Respiratory
Lag 1:0.99 [0.95,1.02]
Lag 2: 0.99 [0.96,1.02]
Lag 3: 1.00 [0.97,1.03]
Asthma
Lag 1:1.03 [0.95,1.12]
Lag 2: 1.01 [0.94,1.10]
Lag 3: 1.00 [0.92,1.09]
C0PD (adult)
Lag 1:0.98 [0.90,1.07]
Lag 2: 1.03 [0.96,1.11]
Lag 3: 1.02 [0.94,1.09]
Reference: Sun et al. (2006, 090768)
ED visits
Pollutant: PMio
Children ED Visits
Period of Study: January 1, 2004 to
Outcome: Asthma (493.xx)
Averaging Time: Monthly avg for 2004
r - 0.626
December 31, 2004
Mean (SD): ~ 60.3//g/m3 (NR)
Age Groups: <55, < 16,16-55 yrs
P - 0.015
Location: Taichung, Taiwan (Central
Study Design: Cross-sectional
(estimated from figure)*
Adult ED Visits
Taiwan)
N: NR
Range (Min, Max): (~ 35, 80)
r - 0.384
Monitoring Stations:
P - 0.109
All diagnoses for all patients at 4 medical
centers
11
Statistical Analyses: Pearson's
Copollutant: NR
correlations, multiple correlation
coefficients from regression analyses.
Covariates: Only copollutants considered
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SPSS
Lags Considered: None
July 2009
E-299
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Szyszkowicz (2007, 092829)
Period of Study: 1 (4/1992-311312002
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Outcome: ED visits for asthma (ICD-
(493)
Study Design: Time-series
Covariates: Temperature, relative
humidity
Statistical Analysis: Poisson regression
Age Groups: All
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean (SD)Unit: 22.6 (13.1)//gfm3
Median, IQR: 19.4,15.0
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Increment: IQR
Percent Relative Risk (95% CI)
"Only statistically significant results are
presented in the paper*
No lag, a 10 years
April to September, All: 3.7 (1.5-6.0)
April to September, Female: 4.5 (1.8-7.3)
April to September, Male: 3.3 (0.1-6.7)
2d lag, < 10 years
Year round, All: 2.7(0.1-5.4)
April to September, All: 6.3 (2.6-10.2)
April to September, Male: 7.4 (3.1-11.9)
2d lag, a 10 years
April to September, All: 2.4 (0.1-4.7)
April to September, Female: 3.9 (1.1-6.7)
July 2009
E-300
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Tecer et al, (2008,180030) Outcome: ED visits for respiratory
problems (ICD-9 470-478, 493)
Period of Study: 1212004-101
Study Design: Bidirectional Case-
Location: Zonguldak, Turkey crossover
Covariates: Daily meteorological
parameters
Statistical Analysis: Conditional logistic
regression
Statistical Package: Stata
Age Groups: 0-14 years
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: NR
Mean, Unit: 53.3/yglm3
Range (Min, Max): 12-237.5
Copollutant (correlation):
PM2.6/PM10
Mean: 0.56
Range: 0.17-0.88
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Asthma
LagO: 1.14(1.03-1.26)
Lag 1:0.92 (0.83-1.02)
Lag 2: 0.92 (0.81-1.03)
Lag 3: 1.01 (0.92-1.11)
Lag 4: 1.16(1.06-1.26)
Allergic Rhinitis with Asthma
Lag 0:1.07 (1.01-1.13)
Lag 1:0.96 (0.91-1.02)
Lag 2: 0.93 (0.88-0.99)
Lag 3: 0.96 (0.90-1.02)
Lag 4: 1.08 (1.02-1.14)
Allergic Rhinitis
LagO: 1.06 (0.99-1.13)
Lag 1:1.08 (1.01-1.16)
Lag 2: 0.92 (0.87-0.99)
Lag 3: 0.97 (0.92-1.03)
Lag 4: 1.09 (1.03-1.16)
Upper Respiratory Disease
LagO: 0.88 (0.68-1.14)
Lag 1: 1.17 (0.91-1.51)
Lag 2: 1.00 (0.76-1.31)
Lag 3: 0.95 (0.76-1.19)
Lag 4: 1.15(0.97-1.35)
Lower Respiratory Disease
LagO: 1.01 (0.86-1.19)
Lag 1: 1.04 (0.88-1.23)
Lag 2: 1.04 (0.92-1.18)
Lag 3: 1.23 (1.07-1.41)
Lag 4: 0.99 (0.90-1.08)
July 2009
E-301
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Tolbert et al. (2007, 090316) Hospital Admissions/ED visits
Period of Study: 1993 ¦ 2004
Location: Atlanta Metropolitan area,
Georgia
Outcome (ICD-9):
Combined RD group, including:
Asthma (493, 786.07, 786.09), C0PD
(491,492,496), URI (460 - 465,460.0,
477), pneumonia (480 - 486), and
bronchiolitis (466.1, 466.11, and
466.19))
Age Groups Analyzed: All
Study Design: Time series
N: 10,234,490 ER visits (283,360 and
1,072,429 visits included in the CVD and
RD groups, respectively)
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
generalized linear models
Covariates: long-term temporal trends,
season (for RD outcome), temperature,
dew point, days of week, federal
holidays, hospital entry and exit
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical package: SAS version 9.1
Lags Considered: 3-day moving
averageflag 0 -2)
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (median
IQR, range, 10"1 - 90"1 percentiles):
26.6 (24.8
17.5-33.8
0.5-98.4
12.3-42.8)
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant (correlation): O3: r - 0.59
NO2: r - 0.53
CO: r - 0.51
SO2: r - 0.21
Coarse PM: r - 0.67
PM2.6: r - 0.84
PM2.6 SO4: r - 0.69
PM2.6 EC: r - 0.61
PM2.6 0C: r - 0.65
PM2.6 TC: r - 0.67
PM2.6 water-sol metals: r - 0.73
0HC: r - 0.53
PM Increment: 16.30/yg/m3 (IQR)
Risk ratio [95% CI]:
Single pollutant models:
RD: 1.015(1.006 - 1.024)
Notes: Results of selected multi-pollutant
models for respiratory disease are
presented in Figure 2.
Figure 2: PM10 adjusted for CO, O3, NO2,
or NO2/O3 (non-winter months only)
Summary of results: PM10 remained
predictive of RD in non-winter months
after adjustment for pollutants.
Reference: Tsai et al. (2006, 089768)
Period of Study: 1996 to 2003
Location: Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
Outcome: Asthma (493)
Age Groups: All (universal health care
covers >96% of the population)
Study Design: Case crossover
N: 17,682 admissions
63 hospitals
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
Logistic Regression
Covariates: Temperature, humidity
Season: Warm and cool seasons
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 0-2 d cumulative
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24 h avg
Mean (SD): 76.62/yglm3 (NR)
Percentiles: 25th: 41.73
50th(Median): 74.40
75th: 104.01
Range (Min, Max): (16.70, 232.00)
Monitoring Stations: 6
Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: 62.28/yg/m3
OR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Single-pollutant model, 0-2 d
cumulative lag
>25°C: 1.302 [1.155,1.467]
< 25°C: 1.556(1.398,1.371]
Two-pollutant models, 0-2 d
cumulative lag
PM10 w/ SO2
> 25°C: 1.305 [1.156,1.473]
< 25°C: 1.540(1.374,1.727]
PM10 wI 03
>25°C: 0.985 [0.842,1.152]
< 25°C: 1.581 [1.402,1.783]
PM10 wI NO2
> 25DC: 1.237 [1.052,1.455]
< 25°C: 1.009(0.875,1.163]
PM10 wI CO
> 25°C: 1.156 [1.012,1.320]
< 25°C: 1.300(1.134,1.490]
July 2009
E-302
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ulirsch et al. (2007, 091332)
Period of Study: 1111994 to 312000
Location: Pocatello, Idaho
Chubbuck,Idaho
Outcome: Respiratory Disease (460-499,
509-519)
Reactive Airway Disease (786.09)
Age Groups: All age groups
Study Design: Time series
N: 39,347 visits (TS1)
29,513 visits (TS2)
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
regression, GLM. Sensitivity Analyses
Covariates: Time, Temperature, Relative
Humidity Influenza
Season: WarmfCool
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: S-Plus
Lags Considered: 0 to 4 day lags
Notes: Time series (TS) 1 includes HA,
ED and urgent care visits. TS 2 includes
family practice data available after 1997
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: NR
Mean (SD):TS1: 24.2//gfm3 (NR)
10th: 10.5
90th: 40.7
TS2: 23.2
10th: 10.0
90th: 37.4
Range (Min, Max):
TS1: (3.0,183.0)
TS2: (3.0,183.0)
Monitoring Stations: 4
Notes: Copollutant (correlation): PMio
w/ NO2: r - 0.47. PMio with other
copollutants weakly correlated.
PM Increment: Single Pollutant Models,
TS1: 24.4/yg/m3
Single Pollutant Models: TS2: 23.2//g|m3
Multipollutant Models: TS1/TS2:
50/yg/m3
Mean Percentage Change, lag 0
TS 1: Single Pollutant
All-age (all year): 4.0 [1.4,6.7]
18-64: 3.4[0.2, 6.7]
0-17: 4.3 [-0.1, 8.9]
65+: 5.6 [-1.4,13.1]
0-17/65+: 5.5 [1.4, 9.6]
All age (Cool season): 4.3 [1.3, 7.5]
All age (Warm season): 6.7 [-0.8,14.8]
TS2: Single Pollutant
All-age: 3.3 [0.3, 6.3]
18-64: 3.3[-0.4,7.0]
0-17:5.0(0.1,10.1]
65+: 6.9[-0.4,14.7]
Multipollutant (PMio + SO2)
All-age (all year): TS1 10.8
TS2 17.5
18-64: TS1 8.0
TS2 9.1
0-17: TS1 10.8
TS2 32.7
65+: TS1 8.7
TS2 31.3
0-17/65+: TS1 14.2
TS2 25.3
All age (Cool season) TS1 11.9
Multipollutant (PMio + NO2)
All-age (all year) TS1: TS2 16.3
18-64: TS1 9.3
TS2 17.3
0-17: TS1 4.6
TS2 18.7
65+: TS1 12.4
TS2 32.7
0-17/65+: TS1 9.5
32.7
All age (Cool season): TS1 11.1
TS2 16.8
Notes: Results from multipollutant model
with PMio, SO2 and NO2 also available.
July 2009
E-303
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Vegni and Ros (2004,
Hospital Admissions
Pollutant: PMio
PM Increment: Increase from 5th—95th
087448)
percentile
Outcome (ICD-9): Respiratory, non-
Averaging Time: 24 h
Period of Study: Sep 1, 2001-Sep 31,
infectious admissions
Mean (5th-95th percentile):
Spring: 85 //g|m3
2002
(ICD: NR)
Overall: 41.5(13-98)
summer: 30 //g|m3
Location: Milan area, Italy
Age Groups: NR
SD - 28.2
Autumn: 93 //g|m3
Study Design: Time series
Spring: 29.0 (10-51)
Winter: 115 //g/m3
N: 9881 admissions
RR Estimate [CI]:
SD - 12.6
Statistical Analyses: Poisson regression
summer: 24.8 (10-40)
Overall: 1.10(0.83,1.46]
Covariates: Temperature, wind velocity,
SD - 9.9
Adjusted: 0.97 [0.67,1.41]
relative humidity, week day, holidays
Autumn: 51.8 (21-114)
Notes: 1-day and 2-day lags show similar
Season: Spring, summer, autumn, winter
results, with no association between
SD - 27.1
PMio and daily hospital admissions
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: STATA v. 5
Winter: 64.1 (20-135)
Lags Considered: 0,1, and 2-day
SD - 35.7
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant: NR
Reference: Vigotti et al. (2007, 090711
Period of Study: 112000-1212000
Location: Pisa, Italy
ED Visits
Outcome: Asthmatic attack (493), dry
cough (468), acute bronchitis (466)
Age Groups: < 10 y
65 +
Study Design: Time series
N: 966 Emergency room visits
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
regression, GAM, LOESS smoothers,
stringent criteria
Covariates: temperature, humidity,
relative humidity, day of study, rainfall,
influenza, day of-the-wk, holidays, time
trend
Season: All year
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 0-5 d
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h
Mean (SD): 35.4 (15.8)//g/m3
Percentiles: 25th: NR
50th(Median): 31.6
75th: NR
Range (Min, Max): (9.5,100.1)
Monitoring Stations:
2
Copollutant (correlation): PMio:
NO?
r - 0.58
CO
r - 0.70
PM Increment: 10 //g/m3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
< 10 y: 10%[2.3,18.2]
lag 1
65+: 8.5% [1.5,16.1]
lag 2
July 2009
E-304
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Xirasagar et al. (2006,
093267)
Period of Study: 1998-2001
Location: Taiwan
Hospital Admission/ED:
Outcome: Asthma or Asthmatic
Bronchitis (493)
Age Groups: Less than 2 years old,
2 ~5 years old, 6 —14 years old
Study Design: N:
N - 27, 275 pediatric hospitalizations
Statistical Analyses: ARIMA Modeling
Spearman's Correlations
Covariates: Season, ambient temp., rel.
humidity, atmospheric pressure, rainfall, h
of sunshine
Season: Spring: February to April
summer: May to July
Autumn: August to October
Winter: November to January
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: EViews 4
Lags Considered: NR
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: Monthly Means
Mean (SD): 24.4//g/m3 (NR)
Percentiles: NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
PM Component: NR
Monitoring Stations: 44 air quality
monitoring banks. 23 weather
observatories
Notes: Copollutant (correlation): Less
than 2 years old: r - 0.315
2 — 5 years old: r - 0.589
6 —14 years old: r - 0.493
PM Increment: NR
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag: NR
AR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag: NR
Notes: Plot of monthly asthma admission
rates per 100,000 population by age
group
Plot of mean monthly concentration
trends of criteria air pollutants
Mean monthly trends of climatic factors
Other Outcomes Assessed? NR
Other Exposures Assessed?
Seasonality
Reference: Wong et al., (2002, 023232) Hospital Admissions
Period of Study: 1995-1997 (Hong
Kong) and 1992-1994 (London)
Location: Hong Kong and London
Outcome (ICD- NR): Asthma (493) for
ages 15-64 and respiratory disease (460-
519) for ages 65 +
Age Groups: 15-64, 65 +
Study Design: Time series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
regression, GAM
Covariates: Temperature, humidity, and
influenza
Season: Warm (Apr-Sep) and cool (Oct-
Mar)
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: S-Plus
Lags Considered: 0-3 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (min-max): Hong Kong: 51.8
(14.1-163.8) SD - 25.0
London: 28.5 (6.8-99.8)
SD - 13.7
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant (correlation): Hong Kong
NO2: r - 0.82
SO2: r - 0.30
O3: r - 0.54
London
NO2: r - 0.68
SO2: r - 0.64
O3: r - 0.17
Other variables: Hong Kong
Temp: r - -0.42
Humidity: r - -0.53
London
Temp: r - 0.02
Humidity: r - -0.05
PM Increment: 10 //g/m3
ER Estimate [CI]:
Single-pollutant excess risk (mean lag 0-1
day)
Asthma-Hong Kong: -1.1 [-2.4,0.1]
Asthma-London: 1.4 [-0.1,3.0]
Respiratory Disease-Hong Kong: 1.0
[0.5,1.5]
Respiratory Disease-London: 0.4 [¦
0.3,1.2]
Warm season
Asthma-Hong Kong: -1.0 [-2.8, 0.8]
Asthma-London: 0.6 [-1.9,3.1]
Respiratory Disease-Hong Kong: 0.8
[0.1,1.4]
Respiratory Disease-London: 1.8
[0.5,3.1]
Cool season
Asthma-Hong Kong: -1.2 [-2.8,0.4]
Asthma-London: 1.6 [-0.3,3.6]
Respiratory Disease-Hong Kong: 1.2
[0.6,1.9]
Respiratory Disease-London: -0.5 [¦
1.5,0.5]
Notes: RRs are shown graphically in Fig
1 and 2. Exposure response curves are
provided in Fig 5 of the article
July 2009
E-305
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Wong et al. (2006, 093266)
Period of Study: 2000-2002
Location: Hong Kong (8 districts)
General Practitioner Visits
Outcome (ICPC-2): Respiratory
diseasesfsymptoms: upper respiratory
tract infections (URTI), lower respiratory
infections, influenza, asthma, COPD,
allergic rhinitis, cough, and other
respiratory diseases
Age Groups: All ages
Study Design: Time series
N: 269,579 visits
Statistical Analyses: GAM, Poisson
regression
Covariates: Season, day of the week,
climate
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: S-Plus
Lags Considered: 0-3 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (min-max): Ranged from 43.4-
56.9 (dependent on location)
Monitoring Stations: 1 per district
Copollutant (correlation): PM2.6:
r - 0.94
O3: r - 0.40
SO2: r - 0.28
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
RR Estimate [CI]:
Overall URTI
1.020[1.016,1.025]
Overall Non-UTRI
1.025[1.018,1.032]
Notes: RRs are also reported for each
individual general practitioner yielding
similar results
Reference: Yang et al. (2007, 092847)
Period of Study: 1996-2003
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Hospital Admission/ED:
Outcome: Asthma (493)
Age Groups: All ages
Study Design: Case-crossover
N: 25,602 asthma hospital admissions
Statistical Analyses: NR
Covariates: Temperature, humidity, day
of-the-wk, seasonality, long term trends
Season: All year
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 0-2
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: NR
Mean (SD): 48.99/yglm3
Percentiles: 25th: 32.64
50th(Median): 44.13
75th: 59.05
Range (Min, Max): (14.44,234.91)
PM Component: NR
Monitoring Stations:
6 Stations
Notes: Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: 26.41 /yglm3
OR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Asthma
Single-Pollutant Model: Temperature
>25° C: 1.046(0.971,1.128]
Temperature <25° C: 1.048(1.011,
1.251]
Two-Pollutant Model: Adjusted for SO2:
>25° 0-1.006(0.920,1.099]
<25° 0-1.088(1.040,1.138]
Adjusted for NO?: >25° 0-0.800(0.717,
0.892]
<25° 0-0.982(0.937,1.029]
Adjusted for 00: > 25° 0-0.920(0.844,
1.002]
<25° 0-1.029(0.984,1.076]
Adjusted for O3: > 25° 0-1.038(0.950,
1.134]
<25° 0-1.042(1.004,1.081]
AR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag: NR
Notes: Other Outcomes Assessed? NR
Other Exposures Assessed? SO2, NO2,
00, 0s
July 2009
E-306
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Yang et al. (2007, 092847)
Period of Study: 1996-2003
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Hospital Admission Pollutant: PMio
Outcome: C0PD (490-192), (494), (496) Averaging Time: 24 h
Age Groups: All ages Mean (SD): 48.99//gfm3
Study Design: Case-crossover 25th: 32.64
N: 46,491 C0PD admissions, 47 hospitals 50th(Median): 44.13
75th: 59.05
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Covariates: Weather, day of-the-wk,
seasonality, long term trends
Season: Warm/Cool
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 0-2 cumulative
Range (Min, Max):
(14.44,48.99)
Monitoring Stations:
6 Stations
Notes: Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: 26.41 //g|m3
OR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
Single-Pollutant Model (0-2 d cum lag):
Temperature >20° C: 1.133(1.098,
1.168]
Temperature <20° C: 1.035(0.994,
1.077]
Two-Pollutant Model:
PMio w/ SO2:
>20° C-1.180[1.139,1.223]
<20° C-1.004(0.954,1.057]
PMio wI NO2:
>20° C-1.013[0.973,1.055]
<20° C-1.074(1.022,1.129]
PMio wI CO:
>20° C-1.061(1.023,1.100]
<20° C-1.067(1.016,1.120]
PMio wI O3:
>20° C-1.097(1.062,1.133]
<20° C-1.036(0.996,1.079]
Reference: Yang et al. (2004, 087488) Hospital Admissions
Period of Study: Jun 1,1995-Mar 31,
1999
Location: Vancouver area, British
Columbia
Outcome (ICD-9): Respiratory diseases
(460-519), pneumonia only (480-486),
asthma only (493)
Age Groups: 0-3 yrs
Study Design: Case control, bidirectional
case-crossover (BCC), and time series
(TS)
N: 1610 cases
Statistical Analyses: Chi-square test,
Logistic regression, GAM (time-series),
GLM with parametric natural cubic
splines
Covariates: Gender, socioeconomic
status, weekday, season, study year,
influenza epidemic month
Season: Spring, summer, fall, winter
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS (Case control
and BCC), S-Plus (TS)
Lags Considered: 0-7 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (min-max):
13.3 (3.8-52.2)
SD - 6.1
Monitoring Stations: NR (data obtained
from Greater Vancouver Regional District
Air Quality Dept)
Copollutant (correlation): PM2.6:
r - 0.83
PMio2.5: r - 0.83
CO: r - 0.46
O3: r - -0.08
NO?: r - 0.54
SO2: r - 0.61
PM Increment: 7.9/yg/m3 (IQR)
OR Estimate [CI]:
Values NR
Notes: Author states that ORs for PMio
increased with lag time up to 3 days for
both single and multiple-pollutant models.
'All units expressed in //gfm3 unless otherwise specified.
July 2009
E-307
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table E-13. Short-term exposure-respiratory-ED/HA-PMi0 2.5
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Chen et al. (2005,
087555)
Period of Study: Jun 1,
1995-Mar 31,1999
Location: Vancouver area, BC
Hospital Admissions
Outcome (ICD-9): Acute respiratory
infections (460-466), upper respiratory
tract infections (470-478), pneumonia
and influenza (480-487), C0PD and
allied conditions (490-496), other
respiratory diseases (500-519)
Age Groups: >65 yrs
Study Design: Time series
N: 12,869
Statistical Analyses: GLM
Covariates: Temp and relative
humidity
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: S-Plus
Lags Considered: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and
7-day avg
Pollutant: PMio 2.5 (/yglm3)
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (min-max):
5.6(0.1-24.6)
SD - 3.6
Monitoring Stations: 13
Copollutant (correlation):
PM2.6: r - 0.38
PM10: r = 0.83
C0H: r - 0.63
CO: r - 0.53
O3: r - -0.13
NO?: r - 0.54
SO2: r - 0.57
Other variables:
Mean temp: r - 0.13
Rel humidity: r - -0.27
PM Increment: 4.2/yglm3
RR Estimate [CI]:
Adj for weather conditions
Overall admission
1-day avg: 1.03 [1.00,1.06]
2-day avg: 1.05(1.02,1.08]
3-day avg: 1.06 [1.02,1.09]
Adj for weather conditions and copollutants
Overall admission
1-day avg: 1.02 [0.98,1.06]
2-day avg: 1.05(1.01,1.10]
3-day avg: 1.06(1.02,1.11]
Notes: RR's were also provided for lags 4-7 in Table 3, yielding
similar results
July 2009
E-308
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Fung et al. (2006,
089789)
Period of Study: 6/1/95-
3/31/99
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Hospital Admission/ED: Hospital
Admission
Outcome: Respiratory diseases (460-
519)
Age Groups: Age > 65
Study Design: Time series
N: 26,275 individuals admitted
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
regression (spline 12 knots), case-
crossover (controls +/7 d days from
case date), Dewanji and Moolgavkar
(DM) method
Covariates: Long-term trends, day-of-
the-week effect, weather
Season: All year
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SPIus, R
Lags Considered: 0-7 d
Pollutant: PMio 2.5 (/yg/m3)
PM Increment::
Averaging Time: 24-h Avg
4.3/yg/m3
Mean (SD)
RR Estimate (65+ years)
5.6(3.88)/yg/m3
DM method:
Range (Min, Max):
1.011[0.998,1.024]
(-2.9, 27.07)
lagO
Monitoring Stations:
1.016[1.0,1.032]
NR
3 d avg
Notes: Copollutant
1.020(1.001,1.039]
(correlation): PMio2.5
5 d avg
PMio
1.020(0.998,1.042]
r - 0.83
7 d avg
PM2.6
Time series:
r - 0.34
1.0168[1.003,1.031]
CO
lagO
r - 0.51
1.020(1.003,1.037]
CoH
3 d avg
r - 0.61
1.019(0.999,1.039]
0s
5 d avg
r - -0.11
1.018(0.994,1.042]
NO?
7 d avg
r - 0.52
Case-crossover:
SO?
1.019(1.003,1.034]
r - 0.57
lagO
1.019(1.009,1.038]
3 d avg
1.020(0.999,1.042]
5 d avg
1.018(0.994,1.043]
7 d avg
July 2009
E-309
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Halonen et al.
Outcome: Hospital Admissions
Pollutant: PM102 E
PM Increment: Interquartile Range
(2009,180379)
Age Groups: 65+ yrs
Averaging Time: daily
Percent Change (Lower CI, Upper CI):
Period of Study: 1998-2004
Study Design: time series
Mean (SD): NR
All Respiratory Mortality
Location: Helsinki, Finland
N: NR
Min: 0.0
Lag 0: -0.66 (-4.16, 2.97)
Statistical Analyses: Poisson, GAM
25"' percentile: 4.9
Lag 1:2.90 (-0.48, 6.39)*
Covariates: temperature, humidity,
50"1 percentile: 7.5
Lag 2: 0.35 (-3.03, 3.84)
influenza epidemics, high pollen
Lag 3: -0.38 (-3.67, 3.02)
episodes, holidays
75"1 percentile: 12.1
Dose-response Investigated? No
Max: 101.4
5-d mean: 0.36 (-4.54, 5.51)
Statistical Package: R
Monitoring Stations: NR
Pneumonia HA
Lags Considered: lags 0-3 815d (0-4)
Copollutant: PMcora, PM0.030.1,
Lag 0:0.72 (-1.28, 2.77)
mean
PM 0.6
Ranged between r - 0.28 and
r - 0.73 across the six cities.
PM Increment: 10//g|m3, and an 18.8//g|m3 increase
(corresponding to an increase in pollutant levels between the
lowest of the 5th percentiles and the highest of the 95th
percentiles of the cities' distributions)
ERR (excess relative risk) Estimate [CI]: For all respiratory
diseases (10 //g|m3 increase): 0-14 years: 6.2% [0.4,12.3]
15-64 years: 2.6%
[¦0.5,5.8]
a 65 years: 1.9% [-1.9, 5.9]
For all respiratory diseases (18.8/yg/m3 increase): 0-14 years:
12.0(0.8, 24.3]
15-64 years: 5.0 [-0.9,11.1]
a 65 years: 3.7 [-3.6,11.4]
For respiratory infections (10/yg/m3): All ages: 4.4% [0.9,
8.0]
For respiratory infections (18/yglm3): All ages: 8.4% [1.7,
15.5]
July 2009
E-310
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Lin et al.
(2005, 087828)
Period of Study: 1998-2001
Location: Toronto, North York,
East York, Etobicoke,
Scarborough, and York
(Canada)
Hospital Admissions
Outcome (ICD-9): Respiratory
infections including laryngitis,
tracheitis, bronchitis, bronchiolitis,
pneumonia, and influenza (464, 466,
480-487)
Age Groups: 0-14 yrs
Study Design: Bidirectional case-
crossover
N: 6782 respiratory infection
hospitalizations
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression (Cox proportional
hazards model)
Covariates: Daily mean temp and dew
point temp
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS 8.2 PHREG
procedure
Lags Considered: 1-7 day averages
Pollutant: PMio-2.5 (//g|m3)
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (min-max):
10.86 (0-45.00)
SD - 5.37
Monitoring Stations: 4
Copollutant (correlation):
PM2.6: r - 0.33
PM10: r - 0.76
CO: r - 0.06
SO2: r - 0.29
NO?: r - 0.40
O3: r = 0.30
PM Increment: 6.5//g|m3
OR Estimate [CI]:
Adjusted for weather
4 day avg: 1.16 [1.07,1.26]
6 day avg: 1.21 [1.10,1.32]
Adj for weather and other gaseous pollutants
4 day avg: 1.13(1.03,1.23]
6 day avg: 1.17(1.06,1.29]
Notes: OR's were also categorized into "Boys" and "Girls,"
yielding similar results
Reference: Lin et al. (2002,
026067)
Period of Study: Jan 1,
1981-Dec 31,1993
Location: Toronto
Hospital Admissions
Outcome (ICD-9): Asthma (493)
Age Groups: 6-12 yrs
Study Design: Uni- and bi-directional
case-crossover (UCC, BCC) and time-
series (TS)
N: 7,319 asthma admissions
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression, GAM
Covariates: Maximum and minimum
temp, avg relative humidity
Season: Apr-Sep, Oct-Mar
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 1-7 day averages
Pollutant: PMio 2.5 (//g|m3)
Averaging Time: 6 days
(predicted daily values)
Mean (min-max):
12.17 (0-68.00)
SD - 7.55
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation):
PM2.6: r - 0.44
PM10: r = 0.83
CO: r - 0.17
SO2: r - 0.28
NO2: r - 0.38
O3: r - 0.56
PM Increment: 8.4/yg/m3
RR Estimate [CI]:
Adj for weather and gaseous pollutants
BCC 5 day avg: 1.14(1.01,1.28]
BCC 6 day avg: 1.17 [1.03,1.33]
TS 5 day avg: 1.14 [1.05,1.23]
TS 6 day avg: 1.15 [1.06,1.25]
Boys-adj for weather
UCC 1 day avg: 1.08 [1.01,1.16]
UCC 2 day avg: 1.08 [0.99,1.17]
BCC 1 day avg: 1.06(1.00,1.14]
BCC 2 day avg: 1.06 [0.98,1.14]
TS 1 day avg: 1.08 [1.03,1.12]
TS 2 day avg: 1.07 [1.01,1.13]
Girls-adj for weather
UCC 1 day avg: 1.07 [0.97,1.18]
UCC 2 day avg: 1.16 [1.03,1.31]
BCC 1 day avg: 0.98 [0.90,1.07]
BCC 2 day avg: 1.05 [0.94,1.16]
TS 1 day avg: 1.00 [0.94,1.06]
TS 2 day avg: 1.05 [0.98,1.13]
Notes: The author also provides RR using UCC, BCC, and TS
analysis for female and male groups for days 3-7, yielding
similar results
July 2009
E-311
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Peel et al. (2005,
056305)
Period of Study: Jan 1993-
Aug 2000
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
ED visits
Outcome: Asthma (493, 786.09)
C0PD (491,492, 496)
URI (460-466, 477)
Pneumonia (480-486)
Age Groups: All ages. Secondary
analyses conducted by age group: 0-1,
2-18, >18
Study Design: Time series
N: 31 hospitals
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GEE for
URI, asthma and all RD
Poisson GLM for pneumonia and C0PD)
Covariates: Avg temperature and dew
point, pollen counts
Season: All (secondary analyses of
warm season)
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: SAS 8.3
S-Plus 2000
Lags Considered: 0-7 d , 3 d ma, 0-13
d unconstrained distributed lag
Pollutant: PMio 2.5 (//g|m3)
Averaging Time: 24 h avg
Mean (SD): 9.7 (4.7)
Percentiles: 10th: 4.4
90th: 16.2
Monitoring Stations:
"Several"
Copollutant (correlation): 24 h
PMio: r - 0.59
8 h O3: r — 0.35
1 h NO?: r - 0.46
1 h CO: r - 0.32
1 h SO2: r - 0.21
24 h PM2.6: r - 0.43
Components: r ranged from 0.23-
0.51
PM Increment: 5
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
All Respiratory Outcomes: 1.003 [0.982,1.025]
URI: 1.013(0.987,1.039]
Asthma: 0.998 [0.987,1.039]
Pneumonia: 0.975 [0.940,1.011]
C0PD: 0.948 [0.897,1.003]
Reference: Peng et al. (2008,
156850)
Period of Study: January 1,
1999-December 31, 2005
Location: 108 U.S. counties in
the following states: Alabama,
Arizona, California, Colorado,
Connecticut, District of
Columbia, Florida, Georgia,
Idaho, Illinois, Indiana,
Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine,
Maryland, Massachusetts,
Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri,
Nevada, New Hampshire, New
Jersey, New Mexico, New
York, North Carolina, Ohio,
Oklahoma, Oregon,
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island,
South Carolina, Tennessee,
Texas, Utah, Virginia,
Washington, West Virginia,
Wisconsin
Outcome (ICD-9): Emergency
hospitalizations for respiratory disease,
including C0PD (490-492) and
respiratory tract infections (464-466,
480 ¦ 487)
Age Groups: 65 + years, 65-74, ,75
Study Design: Time series
N: approximately 12 million Medicare
enrollees (1.4 million RD admissions)
Statistical Analyses: Two-stage
Bayesian hierarchical models: Over
dispersed Poisson models for county-
specific data. Bayesian hierarchical
models to obtain national avg estimate
Covariates: Day of the week, age-
specific intercept, temperature, dew
point temperature, calendar time,
indicator for age of 75 years or older.
Some models were adjusted for PM2.6.
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: R version 2.6.2
Lags Considered: 0-2 days
Pollutant: PMio 2.5
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (IQR): All counties
assessed: 9.8 (6.9-15.0)
Counties in Eastern US: 9.1
(6.6-13.1)
Counties in Western US: 15.4
(10.3-21.8)
Monitoring Stations: At least 1
pair of co-located monitors
(physically located in the same
place) for PM10 and PM2.6 per
county
Copollutant (correlation):
PM2.6: r - 0.12
PM10: r - 0.75
Other variables: Median within-
county correlations between
monitors: r - 0.60
PM Increment: 10//g|m3
Percentage change [95% CI]: Respiratory disease (RD): Lag 0
(unadjusted for PM2.6): 0.33 [-0.21, 0.86]
Lag 0 (adjusted for PM2.6): 0.26 [-0.32, 0.84]
Most values NR (see note)
Notes: Figure 3: Percentage change in emergency hospital
admissions for RD per 10/yg/m3 increase in PM (single
pollutant model and model adjusted for PM2.6 concentration)
Figure 4: Percentage change in emergency hospital admissions
rate for CVD and RD per a 10//g|m3 increase in PMio-2.5 (0-2
day lags, Eastern vs. Western USA)
July 2009
E-312
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Slaughter et al.
(2005, 073854)
Hospital Admissions and ED visits
Pollutant: PMio 2.5 (/yglm3)
PM Increment: 25/yg/m3
Outcome: All respiratory (460-519)
Averaging Time: 24 h avg
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
Period of Study: January
Asthma (493)
Range (90% of
1995 through June 2001
lag:
COPD (491,492, 494,496)
Concentrations): Reported for
ER visits:
Location: Spokane, WA
PM2.6 and PM10 only
Notes
Pneumonia (480-487)
Monitoring Stations: 1
PMio-2.5
Acute URI not including colds and
Copollutant (correlation): PM10
All Respiratory
sinusitis (464, 466,490)
2.5
Lag 1:1.01 [0.98,1
1.04]
Age Groups: All, 15+ years for COPD
PMir - 0.19
Lag 2:1.01(0.98,1
1.04]
Study Design: Time series
PM2.6 r - 0.31
Lag 3:1.02(0.99,1
1.05]
N: 2373 visit records
PM10 r - 0.94
Acute Asthma
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
CO r - 0.32
Lag 1:1.03(0.98,1
1.08]
regression, GLM with natural splines.
For comparison also used GAM with
Temperature r - 0.11
Lag 2:1.01(0.96,1
1.07]
smoothing splines and default
convergence criteria.
Lag 3: 0.99(0.94,1
1.05]
Covariates: Season, temperature,
COPD (adult)
relative humidity, day of week
Lag 1:1.01 (0.93,1
1.09]
Season: All
Lag 2: 0.98(0.90,1
1.06]
Dose-response Investigated?: No
Lag 3:1.02(0.95,1
1.10]
Statistical Package: SAS, SPLUS
Lags Considered: 1 -3 d
July 2009
E-313
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Tecer et al. (2008, Outcome: ED visits for respiratory
180030)
problems (ICD-9 470-478,493)
Period of Study: 1212004-10| Study Design: Bidirectional Case-
crossover
Location: Zonguldak, Turkey
Covariates: Daily meteorological
parameters
Statistical Analysis: Conditional
logistic regression
Statistical Package: Stata
Age Groups: 0-14 years
Pollutant: PMio-2.b
Averaging Time: NR
Mean, Unit: 24.3/yglm3
Range (Min, Max): 4,195.!
Copollutant (correlation):
PM2.BIPM10.2.B
Mean: 1.49
e: 0.21, 7.53
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Asthma
Lag 0:1.18(1.01-1.39)
Lag 1:0.92(0.78-1.08)
Lag 2:0.98(0.84-1.15)
Lag 3:1.11 (0.97-1.27)
Lag 4:1.17(1.05-1.31)
Allergic Rhinitis with Asthma
Lag 0:0.96(0.88-1.04)
Lag 1:1.08(0.99-1.18)
Lag 2: 0.93 (0.86-1.02)
Lag 3:0.94 (0.86-1.03)
Lag 4:1.10(1.03-1.18)
Allergic Rhinitis
Lag 0:1.06(0.95-1.19)
Lag 1:1.17 (1.04-1.31)
Lag 2:0.92(0.84-1.02)
Lag 3:0.99(0.91-1.08)
Lag 4:1.15(1.06-1.25)
Upper Respiratory Disease
Lag 0:0.80(0.54-1.19)
Lag 1:1.22 (0.92-1.61)
Lag 2: 0.97 (0.70-1.33)
Lag 3:0.94 (0.66-1.33)
Lag 4:1.08(0.88-1.32)
Lower Respiratory Disease
Lag 0:0.90(0.71-1.16)
Lag 1:1.20 (0.97-1.50)
Lag 2:1.00(0.84-1.19)
Lag 3:1.26(1.08-1.47)
Lag 4:1.02(0.93-1.13)
July 2009
E-314
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Yang et al„ (2004, Hospital Admissions
087488)
Period of Study: Jun 1,
1995-Mar 31,1999
Location: Vancouver area,
British Columbia
Outcome (ICD-9): Respiratory disi
(460-519), pneumonia only (480-486),
asthma only (493)
Age Groups: 0-3 yrs
Study Design: Case control,
bidirectional case-crossover (BCC), and
time series (TS)
N: 1610 cases
Statistical Analyses: Chi-square test,
Logistic regression, GAM (time-series),
GLM with parametric natural cubic
splines
Covariates: Gender, socioeconomic
status, weekday, season, study year,
influenza epidemic month
Season: Spring, summer, fall, winter
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS (Case
control and BCC), S-Plus (TS)
Lags Considered: 0-7 days
Pollutant: PMio-2.5 (/yglm3)
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (min-max):
5.6 (0-24.6)
SD - 3.6
PM Increment: 4.2/yglm3 (IQR)
OR Estimate [CI]:
3-day lag
1.12[0.98,1.28]
Adj for gaseous pollutants: 1.22 [1.02,1.48]
Monitoring Stations: NR (data Notes: Author states that ORs for PMio 2.5 increased with lag
obtained from Greater Vancouver time up to 3 days for both single and multiple-pollutant models.
Regional District Air Quality More adjusted ORs and RRs are provided in Fig 1.
Dept)
Copollutant (correlation):
PM2.6: r - 0.39
PM10: r = 0.83
CO: r - 0.33
O3: r - -0.16
NO?: r - 0.37
SO2: r - 0.54
'All units expressed in //gfm3 unless otherwise specified.
July 2009
E-315
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table E-14. Short-term exposure-respiratory-ED/HA-PM2.5 (including PM components/sources).
Concentrations'
Reference
Design & Methods
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Andersen et al. (2008,
189651)
Period of Study: May 2001 - December
2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Outcome (ICD-10): RD, including chronic
bronchitis (J41-42), emphysema (J43),
other chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease (J44), asthma (J45), and status
asthmaticus (J46). Pediatric hospital
admissions for asthma (J45) and status
asthmaticus (J46).
Age Groups: > 5-18 years (asthma)
Study Design: Time series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM
Covariates: Temperature, dew-point
temperature, long-term trend,
seasonality, influenza, day of the week,
public holidays, school holidays (only for
5-18 year olds), pollen (only for pediatric
asthma outcome)
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: R statistical
software (gam procedure, mgcv package)
Lags Considered: Lag 0-5 days, 4-day
pollutant avg (lag 0-3) for CVD, 5-day avg
(lag 0-4) for RD, and a 6-day avg (lag 0-5)
for asthma.
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean |jg/m3 (SD
median
IQR
99th percentile): 10 (5
9
7-12
28)
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation): NCtot: r -
0.40
NC100: r - 0.29
NCa12: r - 0.07
Nca23: r - -0.25
NCa57: r - 0.51
NCa2i2: r = 0.82
PMio: r - 0.80
CO: r - 0.46
NO?: r - 0.42
Nox: r - 0.40
Noxcurbside: r - 0.28
0a: r - -0.20
Other variables: Temperature: r - -0.01
Relative humidity: r - 0.21
PM Increment: 5 [Jg/nr1 (IQR)
Relative risk (RR) Estimate [CI]: RD
hospital admissions (5 day avg, lag 0 -4),
age 65+:
One-pollutant model: 1.00 [0.95-1.00]
Adj for NCtot: 1.00 [0.95-1.06]
Asthma hospital admissions (6 day avg
lag 0-5), age 5-18:
One-pollutant model: 1.15 [1.00-1.32]
Adj for NCtot: 1.13(0.98-1.32]
Estimates for individual day lags reported
only in figure form (see notes):
Notes: RD: No statistically or marginally
significant associations. Positive
associatons at Lag 4-5.Asthma: Wide
confidence intervals make interpretation
dificult. Positive associations at Lag 1, 2,
3.
Reference: Babin et al. (2007,188476)
Period of Study: 10/2001-9/2004
Location: Washington, DC
ED Visit/Admissions
Outcome: Asthma-493
Age Groups: 1-17 years,1-4, 5-12,13-
17
Study Design: Time-series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
regression, spline w/12 knots to adjust
for long term trend
Covariates: Temperature, mold, pollen,
seasonal trends,
Season: All
Dose-response lnvestigated?No
Statistical Package: STATA
Lags Considered: 0-4
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-hs
Mean: "low, never reached code red"
Percentiles: NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Monitoring Stations: 3
Copollutant (correlation): NR
PM Increment: 1 /yglm3
%Change ED Visits
Ages 5-12:
¦0.2 (-0.6,0.2), lag 0
% Change ED Admissions:
Ages 5-12:
¦0.4 (-1.6,0.8), lagO
Ages 1-17:
0.2 (-0.6,1.1), lagO
AR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
NR
Notes: No significant interactions
between PM and ozone or other
covariates were observed.
July 2009
E-316
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Barnett et al. (2005,
087394)
Period of Study: 1998-2001
Location: 5 Australian cities (Brisbane,
Canberra, Melbourne, Perth, and Sydney)
and 2 New Zealand cities (Auckland,
Christchurch)
Outcome (ICD: NR): All respiratory
admissions (including asthma, pneumonia,
and acute bronchitis)
Age Groups: Children aged < 1 year, 1-
4 years, and 5-14 years
Study Design: Matched case-crossover
N: ~ 2.4 million children < 15 years old
Statistical Analyses: Random effects
meta-analysis
Covariates: Temperature, current minus
previous day's temperature, relative
humidity, pressure, extremes of hot and
cold, day of the week, public holiday, and
day after public holiday
Season: Warm (Nov-Apr) and Cool (May-
Oct)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: NR
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-hs
Mean (min-max):
Auckland (A): 11.0 (2.1-37.6)
Brisbane (B): 9.7 (3.2-122.8)
Canberra (Ca): NR
Christchurch (Ch): NR
Melbourne (M): 8.9 (2.8-43.3)
Perth (P): 8.1 (1.7-29.3)
Sydney (S): 9.4 (2.4-82.1)
Monitoring Stations: 1-3 per city
Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: 3.8 //g|m3 (IQR)
Percent Increase Estimate [CI]:
Pneumonia & Acute Bronchitis:
Single Pollutant Model
<1 yr (B,M,P,S): 1.7 [0.0,3.4]
1-4 yrs (B,M,P,S): 2.4 [0.1,4.7]
Matched Multipollutant Model
1-4 yrs with 1-h SOz (B,S): 1.9 [-1.7,5.6]
1-4 yrs with temp (B,M,P,S): 2.3 [¦
0.4,5.1]
Respiratory Admissions:
Single Pollutant Model
<1 yr (B,M,P,S): 2.4(1.0,3.8]
1-4 yrs (B,M,P,S): 1.7(0.7,2.7]
Matched Pollutant Model
<1 yr with 1-h SOz (B,S): 3.1 [0.5,5.7]
< 1 yr with temp (B,M,P,S): 1.8
[0.2,3.4]
1-4 yrs with PMio (B,M,P,S): 2.9
[0.2,5.6]
1-4 yrs with 1-h SOz (B,S): 1.3 [-1.8,4.4]
1-4 yrs with 1-h NOz (B,M,P,S): -1.5 [-
3.2,0.2]
1-4 yrs with temp (B,M,P,S,): 1.5 [¦
0.2,3.1]
Reference: Bell et al. (2008, 091268)
Period of Study: 1995 ¦ 2002
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Outcome (ICD-9): Hospital admissions
for asthma (493), and pneumonia (486).
Age Groups: All
Study Design: Time series
N: 19,966 hospital admissions for
pneumonia, and 10,231 for asthma
Statistical Analyses: Poisson regression
Covariates: Day of the week, time,
apparent temperature, long-term trends,
seasonality
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: lags 0-3 days, mean of
lags 0-3
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (range
IQR): 31.6(0.50-355.0
20.2)
Monitoring Stations: 2
Copollutant (correlation): NR
PM Increment: 20/yg/m3 (near IQR)
Percentage increase estimate [95% CI]:
Asthma: L0: 0.46 (-2.41, 3.42)
L1:-1.36 (-4.33,1.71)
L2: -0.83 (-3.67, 2.10)
L3: -0.78 (-3.63, 2.16)
L03: -1.75 (-6.21, 2.92)
Pneumonia: L0: 0.06 (-2.74, 2.94)
L1: 0.34(-2.446, 3.20)
L2: -0.59 (-3.38, 2.29)
L3:-0.44 (-3.22, 2.41)
L03: -0.61 (-4.87, 3.85)
Reference: Bell et al. (2008, 091268)
Period of Study: 1999 ¦ 2005
Location: 202 US counties
Outcome (ICD-9): C0PD (490-492),
respiratory tract infections (464 ¦ 466,
480 ¦ 487)
Age Groups: 65 +
Study Design: Time series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: Two-stage
Bayesian hierarchical model to find
national avg
First stage: Poisson regression (county-
specific)
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (/L/g|m3):
Descriptive information presented in
Figure S2 (boxplots):
IQR: 8.7 //g/m3
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant (correlation): NR
PM Increment: 10 //g|m3
Percent increase [95% PI]: Respiratory
admissions: Lag 0 (all seasons): 0.22 [¦
0.12-0.56]
Lag 0 (winter, national): 1.05 [0.29—
1.82]
Lag 0 (winter, northeast): 1.76 [0.60-
2.93]
Lag 0 (winter, southeast): 0.59 [-1.35—
2.58]
Lag 0 (winter, northwest): -0.07 [-6.74-
7.08]
July 2009
E-317
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Covariates: day of the week,
temperature, dew point temperature,
temporal trends, indicator for persons
75+ years, population size
Season: All, June-August (Summer),
September-November (Fall), December-
February (Winter), March-May (Spring)
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 0-2 day lags
Lag 0 (winter, southwest): 0.03 [-1.25—
1.34]
Lag 0 (spring, national): 0.31 [-0.47—
1.11]
Lag 0 (spring, northeast): 0.34 [-0.66—
1.34]
Lag 0 (spring, southeast): -0.06 [-1.77-
1.68]
Lag 0 (spring, northwest): -8.52 [-25.62-
12.51]
Lag 0 (spring, southwest): 1.87 [-2.00—
5.90]
Lag 0 (summer, national): -0.62 [-1.33—
0.09]
Lag 0 (summer, northeast): -0.8 [-1.65-
0.07]
Lag 0 (summer, southeast): -0.15 [-1.88—
I.61]
Lag 0 (summer, northwest): 0.25 [¦
21.46-27.96]
Lag 0 (summer, southwest): 0.64 [-5.38-
7.04]
Lag 0 (autumn, national): 0.02 [-0.63—
0.67]
Lag 0 (autumn, northeast): -0.01 [-0.87—
0.85]
Lag 0 (autumn, southeast): -0.58 [-2.06—
0.91]
Lag 0 (autumn, northwest): -1.38 [¦
II.84-10.32]
Lag 0 (autumn, southwest): 1.77 [-0.73—
4.33]
Lag 1 (all seasons): 0.05 [-0.29-0.39]
Lag 1 (winter): 0.50 [-0.27—1.27]
Lag 1 (spring): -0.24 [-1.01 -0.53]
Lag 1 (summer): 0.28 [-0.39-0.95]
Lag 1 (autumn): 0.15 [-0.49-0.79]
Lag 2 (all seasons): 0.41 [0.09-0.74]
Lag 2 (winter, national): 0.72 [0.01 —
1.43]
Lag 2 (winter, northeast): 0.79 [-0.21 —
1.80]
Lag 2 (winter, southeast): 0.4 [¦ 1.45,
2.27]
Lag 2 (winter, northwest): -0.06 [-6.52-
6.85]
Lag 2 (winter, southwest): 1.2 [-0.10-
2.52]
Lag 2 (spring, national): 0.35 [-0.29—
0.99]
Lag 2 (spring, northeast): 0.04 [-0.88—
0.97]
Lag 2 (spring, southeast): 0.75 [-0.82—
2.34]
Lag 2 (spring, northwest): 2.29 [-14.26—
22.03]
July 2009
E-318
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Lag 2 (spring, southwest): 1.05 [-2.18-
4.39]
Lag 2 (summer, national): 0.57 [-0.07—
1.23]
Lag 2 (summer, northeast): 0.77 [-0.01 —
1.56]
| Lag 2 (summer, southeast): -0.52 [¦
2.07-1.06]
Lag 2 (summer, northwest): 0.74 [¦
18.73-24.86]
Lag 2 (summer, southwest): 2.41 [-2.61 —
7.69]
Lag 2 (autumn, national): 0.39 [-0.22—
1.01]
Lag 2 (autumn, northeast): 0.12 [-0.82-
1.07]
Lag 2 (autumn, southeast): 0.14 [-1.29—
1.59]
Lag 2 (autumn, northwest): -0.74 [¦
10.08-9.58]
Lag 2 (autumn, southwest): 0.97[-1.36—
3.36]
Reference: Bell et al. (2009,191007)
Period of Study: 1999-2005
Location: 168 US Counties
Outcome: Respiratory hospital
admissions
Study Design: Retrospective Cohort
Covariates: socio-economic conditions,
long term temperature
Statistical Analysis: Bayesian
hierarchical model
Age Groups: £65
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean (SD) Unit: NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Increment: 20% of the population
acquiring air conditioning
Percent Change (95% CI) in
community-specific PM health effect
estimates for respiratory hospital
admissions
Any AC, including window units
Yearly health effect: 44.5 (-87.5-176)
Summer health effect: -74.8 (-417-267)
Winter health effect: -32.5 (-245-180)
Central AC
Yearly health effect: 27.6 (-46.7-102)
Summer health effect: -38.6 (-160-82.6)
Winter health effect: 43.8 (-125-213)
July 2009
E-319
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Bell et al. (2009,191007)
Period of Study: 1999-2005
Location: 168 US Counties
Outcome: Respiratory HA
Age Groups: 65 +
Study Design: time series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: Bayesian
Hierarchical Regression
Covariates: time trend, day of week,
seasonality, dew point, temperature
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 0-2
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: daily
Mean:
EC: 0.715
Ni: 0.002
V: 0.003
Min:
EC: 0.309
Ni: 0.003
V: 0.001
Max:
EC: 1.73
Ni: 0.021
V: 0.010
Interquartile Range:
EC: 0.245
Ni: 0.001
V: 0.001
Interquartile Range of Percents:
EC: 1.7
Ni: 0.01
V: 0.01
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: Al, NH4+, As, Ca, CI, Cu,
EC, 0MC, Fe, Pb, Mg. Ni, NOs-, K, Si,
Na+, S04-, Ti, V, Zn
Co-pollutant Correlation
Ni, V: 0.48
V, EC: 0.33
Ni, EC: 0.30
Note: Pollutant concentrations available
for all fractions of PM2.6
PM Increment: Interquartile Range in
the fraction of PM2.6
Percent Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI):
EC: 511 (80.7, 941), lag 0
EC + Ni: 399(45.1,843), lag 0
EC + V: 386 (-74.8, 846), lag 0
EC + Ni, V: 362 (-98.0, 823), lag 0
Ni: 223 (36.9,410), lag 0
Ni + EC: 176(-18.7,370), lag 0
Ni + V: 151 (-78.4, 381), lag 0
Ni + EC, V: 136 (-94.9, 368), lag 0
V: 392 (46.3, 738), lag 0
V + EC: 279 (-93.2, 651), lag 0
V+Ni: 230(-193.7,653), lag 0
V + EC, Ni: 140 (-300, 579), lag 0
EC:-1.5 (80.7, 941), lag 1
EC: 17.5 (-22.3, 57.3), lag 2
Ni:-7.2 (-66.6. 52.1), lag 1
Ni: -4.9 (-22.3,12.5), lag 2
V: -19.6 (-127, 88.3), lag 1
V: 10.5(-21.5,42.4), lag 2
HS education: -77.8 (-390, 234), lag 0
median income: 45.9 (-411, 503), lagO
Percent black: -53.1 (-557, 451), lag 0
Percent living in urban area: -41.9 (¦
774.7, 691), lag 0
Population: -22.9 (-121, 75.3), lag 0
Notes: Interquartile ranges in percent HS
education, median income, percent black,
percent living in urban area, and
population are 5.2 %, $9,223,17.3%,
11.0%, and 549,283 respectively.
July 2009
E-320
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Chardon et al. (2007,
091308)
Period of Study: 2000-2003
Location: Greater Paris Area, France
Doctors house calls
Outcome (ICPC2): Asthma (R96), Upper
respiratory disease (URD R07, R21, R29,
R75, R76, R02), Lower respiratory
disease (LRD, R05, R78)
Age Groups: all
Study Design: Time series
N: 8027 for asthma
52928 for LRD
74845 for URD
Statistical Analyses: Quasi-Poisson,
GAM, parametric penalized spline
smoothers.
Covariates: Lagged and current
temperature, humidity, long term trends,
seasonality, pollen counts, influenza
epidemic, days of the week, holidays,
bank holidays
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: R
Lags Considered: 0-3 days
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: mean of the daily
means
Mean (SD): 14.7(7.34)//g/m3
Percentiles: 25th: 9.5
50th(Median): 12.9
75th: 18.2
Range (Min, Max): (3, 69.6)
Monitoring Stations: 1- 4
Copollutant: PMio: r - 0.95
NO?: r - 0.68
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3
% Change, lag 0-3 d avg
URD
6.0(3.1,9.1)
LRD
5.8 (2.8, 8.9)
Asthma
4.4(-1.3,10.4)
Reference: Chen et al. (2005, 087555) Hospital Admissions
Period of Study: Jun 1,1995-Mar 31,
1999
Location: Vancouver area, BC
Outcome (ICD-9): Acute respiratory
infections (460-466), upper respiratory
tract infections (470-478), pneumonia
and influenza (480-487), C0PD and allied
conditions (490-496), other respiratory
diseases (500-519)
Age Groups: >65 yrs
Study Design: Time series
N: 12,869
Statistical Analyses: GLM
Covariates: Temp and relative humidity
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: S-Plus
Lags Considered: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7-
day avg
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (min-max):
7.7 (2.0-32.0)
SD - 3.7
Monitoring Stations: 13
Copollutant (correlation): PMio:
r - 0.83
PM 10-2.5: r - 0.38
C0H: r - 0.39
CO: r - 0.23
0a: r - -0.01
NO?: r - 0.36
SO?: r - 0.42
Other variables:
Mean temp: r - 0.41
Rel humidity: r - -0.23
PM Increment: 4.0 /yglm3 (IQR)
RR Estimate [CI]:
Adj for weather conditions
Overall admission
1-day avg: 1.02 [0.99,1.05]
2-day avg: 1.02 [0.99,1.06]
3-day avg: 1.02 [0.98,1.05]
Adj for weather conditions and
copollutants
Overall admission
1-day avg: 1.01 [0.98,1.06]
2-day avg: 1.01 [0.98,1.05]
3-day avg: 1.00 [0.96,1.04]
Notes: RR's were also provided for lags
4-7 in Table 3, yielding similar results
July 2009
E-321
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Chimonas and Gessner
(2007,093261)
Period of Study: January 1,1999-June
30, 2003
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Outcome (ICD-9): Asthma (493.0-493.9)
Lower respiratory illness-LRI (466.1,
466.0, 480-487, 490,510-511)
Inhaled quick-relief medication
Steroid medication
Age Groups: < 20 years old
Study Design: Time series
N: 42,667 admissions
Statistical Analyses: GEE for
multivariable modeling
Covariates: Season, serial correlation,
year, weekend, temperature,
precipitation, and wind speed
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SPSS (dataset),
SAS (analysis)
Lags Considered: 1 day and 1 week
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-hs and 1 week
Mean (min-max):
Daily: 6.1 (0.5-69.8)
Weekly: 5.8 (1.8-45.0)
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: N/A
PM Increment: 5 /yglm3
RR Estimate [CI]:
Same Day
Outpatient Asthma: 0.992 [0.964,1.024]
Outpatient LRI: 0.952 [0.907,1.001]
Inpatient Asthma: 0.936 [0.798,1.098]
Inpatient LRI: 0.919(0.823,1.027]
Inhaled Steroid Prescriptions: 0.988
[0.902,1.083]
Quick-relief Medication: 0.962
[0.901,1.028]
Weekly (median increase)
Outpatient Asthma: 0.983 [0.935,1.038]
Outpatient LRI: 0.969 [0.874,1.075]
Inpatient Asthma: 0.754 [0.513.1.109]
Inpatient LRI: 0.943 [0.715,1.245]
Inhaled Steroid Prescriptions: 1.018
[0.883,1.175]
Quick-relief Medication: 0.978
[0.882,1.087]
July 2009
E-322
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Delfino et al. (2009,191994) Outcome: Respiratory hospital Pollutant: PM2.6
admissions
Period of Study: 10/1/2003- Averaging Time: Hourly
1111512003 Study Design: Time series
Mean (SD) Unit by county:
Location: Southern California Statistical Analysis: Poisson regression
with GEE Los Angeles
Age Groups: All Before Fires: 272 (12-4'/^'m3
During Fires: 54.1 (21.0) //g/m3
After Fires: 15.9 (5.5)//g/m3
Orange
Before Fires: 23.2 (9.6) //g/m3
During Fires: 64.3 (26.5) //g/m3
After Fires: 15.5 (10.2)//g/m3
Riverside
Before Fires: 32.7 (14.7) //g/m3
During Fires: 42.1 (25.5) //g/m3
After Fires: 16.9 (10.2)//g/m3
San Bernadino
Before Fires: 35.7 (16.6) //g/m3
During Fires: 45.3 (28.7) //g/m3
After Fires: 18.5 (8.3)//g/m3
San Diego
Before Fires: 18.5 (6.7) //g/m3
During Fires: 76.1 (66.6)//g/m3
After Fires: 14.2 (7.2)//g/m3
Ventura
Before Fires: 18.4 (8.3) //g/m3
During Fires: 50.1 (50.5)//g/m3
After Fires: 12.9 (4.3)//g/m3
Copollutant (correlation): NR
July 2009
E-323
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Relative Rate (Min CI, Max CI)
All Respiratory, All Ages: All Periods:
1.009 (0.999-1.018)
Pre-Wildfire: 1.022 (1.004-1.040)
Wildfire: 1.028 (1.014-1.041), p - 0.639
Post-Wildfire: 0.999 (0.968-1.031), p -
0.198
All Respiratory, Ages 0-4: All Periods:
0.994 (0.967-1.021)
Pre-Wildfire: 0.982 (0.921-1.046)
Wildfire: 1.045 (1.010-1.082), p - 0.103
Post-Wildfire: 0.894 (0.807-0.991), p -
0.126
All Respiratory, Ages 5-19: All Periods:
1.014(0.983-1.046)
Pre-Wildfire: 1.026 (0.946-1.113)
Wildfire: 1.027 (0.984-1.076), p - 0.990
Post-Wildfire: 0.958 (0.852-1.077), p -
0.354
All Respiratory, Ages 20-64: All Periods:
1.015(1.002-1.029)
Pre-Wildfire: 1.036 (1.007-1.066)
Wildfire: 1.024 (1.005-1.044), p - 0.534
Post-Wildfire: 1.007 (0.960-1.056), p -
0.315
All Respiratory, Ages 65-99: All Periods:
1.009 (0.996-1.022)
Pre-Wildfire: 1.022 (0.994-1.050)
Wildfire: 1.030 (1.011-1.049), p - 0.649
Post-Wildfire: 1.024 (0.967-1.074), p -
0.932
Asthma, All Ages, Male and Female: All
Periods: 1.022 (1.001-1.042)
Pre-Wildfire: 0.998 (0.949-1.050)
Wildfire: 1.048 (1.021-1.076), p - 0.097
Post-Wildfire: 0.986 (0.910-1.068), p -
0.792
Asthma, All Ages, Male: All Periods:
1.010(0.980-1.040)
P re-Wildfire: 1.021 (0.944-1.106)
Wildfire: 1.031 (0.990-1.073), p - 0.848
Post-Wildfire: 1.063 (0.948-1.192), p -
0.553
Asthma, All Ages, Female: All Periods:
1.029 (1.001-1.058)
Pre-Wildfire: 0.979(0.913-1.050)
Wildfire: 1.059 (1.022-1.097), p - 0.056
Post-Wildfire: 0.928 (0.829-1.037), p -
0.412
Asthma, Ages 0-4, Males and Females:
All Periods: 0.996 (0.947-1.048)
Pre-Wildfire: 0.924 (0.824-1.035)
Wildfire: 1.083 (1.021-1.149), p - 0.017
Post-Wildfire: 0.924 (0.767-1.113), p -
O.eQBAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
Asthma, Ages 0-4, Males: All Periods:
1.018(0.963-1.076)
Pre-Wildfire: 0.942 (0.815-1.089)
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Dominici et al. (2006,
088398)
Period of Study: 1999 ¦ 2002
Location: 204 US counties, located in:
Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas,
California, Colorado, Connecticut,
Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida,
Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana,
Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana,
Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts,
Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi,
Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, New
Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North
Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon,
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South
Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah,
Virginia, Washington, West Virginia,
Wisconsin
Outcome (ICD-9: Daily counts of hospital
admissions for primary diagnosis of
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
(490-492), and respiratory tract
infections (464-466, 480-487).
Age Groups: >65 years
Study Design: Time series
N: 11.5 million Medicare enrollees
Statistical Analyses: Bayesian 2-stage
hierarchical models.
First stage: Poisson regression (county-
specific)
Second stage: Bayesian hierarchical
models, to produce a national avg
estimate
Covariates: Day of the week,
seasonality, temperature, dew point
temperature, long-term trends
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: R statistical
software version 2.2.0
Lags Considered: 0-2 days, avg of days
0-2
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean U/g/m3) (IQR): 13.4 (11.3-15.2)
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Other variables: Median of pairwise
correlations among PM2.6 monitors within
the same county for 2000: r - 0.91 (IQR:
0.81-0.95)
PM Increment: 10 //gf'nv1 (Results in
figures
see notes)
Percent increase in risk [95% PI]: C0PD
(Lag 0): Age 65 +: 0.91 [0.18,1.64]
Age 65-74:0.42 [-0.64,1.48]
Age 75 + : 1.47 [0.54, 2.40]
Respiratory tract infection: Age 65+:
0.92 [0.41,1.43]
Age 65-74: 0.93 [0.04,1.82]
Age 75 + : 0.92 [0.32,1.53]
Annual reduction in admissions
attributable to a 10 //gf'nv1 reduction in
daily PM2.6 level (95% PI):
Cerebrovascular disease: Annual number
of admissions: 226,641
Annual reduction in admissions: 1836
[680, 2992]
C0PD: Annual number of admissions:
108,812
Annual reduction in admissions: 990
[196,1785]
Respiratory tract infections: Annual
number of admissions: 226,620
Annual reduction in admissions: 2085
[929, 3241]
Reference: Dominici et al. (2006,
088398)
Period of Study: 1999-2002
Location: U.S. (mainland)
Outcome (ICD-9): Respiratory tract
infections (464-466,480-487) and
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
(490-492)
Age Groups: All >65 yrs
65-74 yrs
>75 yrs
Study Design: Time series
N: 11.5 million at-risk
Statistical Analyses: Bayesian 2-stage
hierarchical models (day-to-day variation),
Poisson regression (county-specific RRs)
Covariates: Calendar time (seasonality
and year), temperature, dew point
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 0,1, 2 days
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: daily or every 3 days
(depending on county)
Mean: 13.4 (IQR: 11.3-15.2)
Monitoring Stations: NR (used data
from Air Quality System database)
Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Percentage Change in Hospital
Admission Rates [PI]:
COPD-Same day
All >65: 0.91 [0.18,1.64]
65-74 yrs: 0.42 [-0.64,1.48]
>75:1.47 [0.54,2.40]
Respiratory Tract lnfections-2-day lag
All >65: 0.92(0.41,1.43]
65-74 yrs: 0.93 [0.04,1.82]
>75:0.92 [0.32,1.53]
Notes: Other lag data shown in Fig 2-4
July 2009
E-324
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Erbas et al. (2005)
Period of Study: Jul 1,1989-Dec 31,
1992
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Outcome (ICD): COPD (490-492, 494,
496)
Asthma (493)
Age Groups: NR
Study Design: Time series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: GLM, GAM,
Parameter Driven Poisson Regression,
Transitional Regression, Seasonal-Trend
decomposition based on Loess smoothing
for seasonal adjustment
Covariates: Secular trends, seasonality,
relative humidity, dry bulb temp, dew
point temp
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: S-Plus, SAS
Lags Considered: 0-5 days
Pollutant: PMo.i i (API)
Averaging Time: 24-hs
Mean (min-max): NR
Monitoring Stations: 9
Copollutant (correlation): NR
PM Increment: Increase from the 10th-
90th percentile (value NR)
RR Estimate [CI]:
COPD
GAM:
0.95[0.91,1.00]
GLM, PDM, TRM: NR
Asthma
NR
Notes: This study was used to
demonstrate that conclusions are highly
dependent on the type of model used
Reference: Fung et al. (2006, 089789)
Period of Study: 6/1/95-3/31/99
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Hospital Admission/ED:
Hospital Admission
Outcome: Respiratory diseases (460-
519)
Age Groups: Age >65
Study Design: Time series, case
crossover
N: 26,275 individuals admitted
Statistical Analyses: Poisson regression
(spline 12 knots), case-crossover
(controls +/7 d days from case date),
Dewanji and Moolgavkar (DM) method
Covariates: Long-term trends, day-of-
the-week effect, weather
Season: All year
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SPIus, R
Lags Considered: 0-7 d
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-h Avg
Mean (SD): 7.72(3.61)
Range (Min, Max): (2, 32)
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant (correlation): PM2 e:
PM10
r - 0.80
PMio-2.5
r - 0.34
CO
r - 0.23
CoH
r - 0.38
0s
r - -0.03
NO?
r - 0.36
SO?
r - 0.42
PM Increment::
4/yg/m3
RR Estimate (65+ years)
DM method:
1.007[0.994,1.020]
Current
1.007(0.990,1.023]
3 day
0.995(0.979,1.012]
5 day
0.995(0.971,1.020]
7 day
Time series:
1.003(0.989,1.018]
Current
1.000(0.982,1.018]
3 day
0.993(0.972,1.014]
5 day
0.995(0.971,1.020]
7 day
Case-crossover:
1.002(0.986,1.019]
Current
1.001(0.981,1.021]
3 day
0.988(0.966,1.011]
5 day
0.984(0.959,1.010]
7 day
July 2009
E-325
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Hinwood et al. (2006,
088976)
Period of Study: 1/1992-12/1998
Location: Perth, Australia
Hospital Admission
Outcome (ICD-9): COPD (490-496.99,
except asthma), pneumonia /influenza
(480-489.99), asthma
Age Groups: All ages
Study Design: Time stratified case-
crossover
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Covariates: Time trend, season,
temperature, humidity, day of wk,
holidays
Season: All year
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 0-3 days
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-h Avg
Mean (SD): 9.2 (4.3)
Percentiles:
10th: 5.0
90th: 14.5
Monitoring Stations: 13
Notes: Copollutant: NR
Increment: 1 //gf'nr1
Notes: Odds ratio for PM2.6 and all
respiratory, COPD, pneumonia and
asthma. Authors found an elevation in the
odds ratio for lags 2 and 3 reaaching
significance in all age groups for lag 3.
For each increase of 1 /yglm3, the number
of hospitalizations increases 0.2% for
respiratory disease, 0.5% for pneumonia
and 0.3% for asthna. PM2.6
concentrations were also significantly
associated with asthma for those aged
under 15 years with an estimated 0.5%
increase in hospitalizations.
July 2009
E-326
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Hirshon et al. (2008,
180375)
Period of Study: 612002-1112002
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Outcome: Hospital admissions for
asthma
Study Design: Time-series
Covariates: Spatial distance from
pollution monitor, demographic variation,
long term, seasonal and daily trends,
weather and other pollutants
Statistical Analysis: Overdispersed
Poisson regression
Age Groups: 0-17 years
Pollutant: PM2.6 zinc
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean (SD) Unit: 22.42 (25.14)//gfm3
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation):
Ni: 0.41
Cr: 0.17
Fe: 0.54
Sulfate: 0.01
CO: 0.40
PM2.6: 0.39
0s: 0.01
NO?: 0.66
Elemental Carbon: 0.48
Increment: NR
Relative Risk (95% CI), Best fit Model
Medium - 8.63-20.76 ng/m3
High - > 20.76 nglm3
No Lag
Medium: 1.12(0.98-1.28)
High: 1.09 (0.91-1.30)
1-day Lag
Medium: 1.23(1.07-1.41)
High: 1.16 (0.97-1.39)
2-day Lag
Medium: 1.11 (0.94-1.30)
High: 1.15 (0.96-1.38)
Controlling for Time Trends
No Lag
Medium: 1.08 (0.95-1.23)
High: 0.98 (0.86-1.11)
1-day Lag
Medium: 1.13(1.003-1.28)
High: 1.03 (0.91-1.16)
2-day Lag
Medium: 1.13 ()
High: 0.98-1.31
Controlling for Time Trends and
Additional Copollutants
No Lag
Medium: 1.12(0.98-1.29)
High: 1.09 (1.01-1.30)
1-day Lag
Medium: 1.20(1.04-1.38)
High: 1.12 (0.93-1.35)
2-day Lag
Medium: 1.12(0.95-1.32)
High: 1.19 (0.98-1.44)
July 2009
E-327
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Host et al. (2007,155851)
Period of Study: 2000 - 2003
Location: Six French cities: Le Havre,
Lille, Marseille, Paris, Rouen, and
Toulouse
Outcome (ICD-10): Daily hospitalizations
for all respiratory diseases (J00-J99),
respiratory infections (J10-J22).
Age Groups: For all respiratory
0-14 years, 15-64 years, and a 65
years.
For respiratory infections: All ages
Study Design: Time series
N: NR (Total population of cities:
approximately 10 million)
Statistical Analyses: Poisson regression
Covariates: Seasons, days of the week,
holidays, influenza epidemics, pollen
counts, temperature, and temporal trends
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: MGCV package in
R software (R 2.1.1)
Lags Considered: Avg of 0-1 days
Pollutant: PM2.B
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (5th -95th percentile): Le Havre:
13.8(6.0-30.5)
Lille: 15.9(6.9-26.3)
Marseille: 18.8(8.0-33.0)
Paris: 14.7 (6.5-28.8)
Rouen: 14.4 (7.5-28.0)
Toulouse: 13.8 (6.0-25.0)
Monitoring Stations: 13 total: 1 in
Toulouse
4 in Paris
2 each in other cities
Copollutant (correlation): PMio-2.b:
Overall: r > 0.6
Ranged between r - 0.28 and
r - 0.73 across the six cities.
PM Increment: 10 //gf'nv1 increase, and a
27 /yglm3 increase (corresponding to the
difference between the lowest of the 5th
percentiles and the highest of the 95th
percentiles of the cities' distributions)
ERR (excess relative risk) Estimate [CI]:
For all respiratory diseases (27 //g|m3
increase): 0-14 years: 1.1% [-3.1, 5.5]
15-64 years: 2.2% [-1.8, 6.4];
>65 years: 1.3% [-5.3,8.2]
For respiratory infections (10 //g|m3
increase): All ages: 2.5% [0.1, 4.8]
For respiratory infections (27 //g|m3
increase): All ages: 7.0% [0.7,13.6]
Reference: Ko et al. (2007, 091639)
Period of Study: 1/2000-12/2004
Location: Hong Kong, China
ED Visits
Outcome (ICD-9): C0PD: Chronic
bronchitis (491), Emphysema (492),
Chronic airway obstruction (496)
Age Groups: All ages
Study Design: Time series
N: 15 hospitals, 119,225 admissions
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
regression, GAM with stringent
convergence criteria, APHEA2 protocol.
Covariates: Time trend, season,
temperature, humidity, other cyclical
factors, day, day of wk, holidays
Season: All year, interactions with
season tested
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SPLUS 4.0
Lags Considered: 0-5 days
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-h
Mean (SD): 35.7 (20.6)
Percentiles:
25th: 19.4
50th(Median): 31.7
75th: 46.7
Range (Min, Max): (6.0,163.2)
Monitoring Stations: 14
Copollutant (correlation): PM2 e:
PM10
r - 0.952
NO2
r - 0.441
0s
r - 0.394
SO2
r - 0.282
PM Increment: PM10
RR Estimate
C0PD
1.002(0.998,1.001]
lag 0
1.003(0.999,1.007]
lag 1
1.011(1.007,1.014]
lag 2
1.013[1.010,1.017]
lag 3
1.011[1.008,1.015]
lag 4
1.009(1.006,1.013]
lag 5
1.004(0.999,1.008]lag 0-1
1.010(1.006,1.015]lag 0-2
1.018(1.013,1.022]lag 0-3
1.024(1.019,1.029]lag 0-4
1.031(1.026,1.036]lag 0-5
4-Pollutant model:
1.014(1.007,1.022]
lag 0-5
3-Pollutant model:
1.011(1.004,1.017]
lag 0-5
July 2009
E-328
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ko et al. (2007, 092844)
Period of Study: 1/2000-12/2005
Location: Hong Kong, China
Hospital Admission
Outcome (ICD-9): Asthma (493)
Age Groups: All, 0-14,15-56, 65 +
Study Design: Time series
N: 69,716 admissions, 15 hospitals
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
regression, with GAM with stringent
convergence criteria.
Covariates: Time trend, season,
temperature, humidity, other cyclical
factors
Season: All year, evaluated effect of
season in analysis
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SPLUS 4.0
Lags Considered: 0-5 days
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-h
Mean (SD): 36.4 (21.1)
Percentiles:
25th: 20.0
50th(Median): 32.5
75th: 47.7
Range (Min, Max): (6,163)
Monitoring Stations: 14
Copollutant (correlation): PM2 e:
PM10
r - 0.956
NO?
r - 0.774
0s
r - 0.585
SO?
r - 0.482
PM Increment: 10.0 /yglm3
RR Estimate
Asthma (Single-pollutant model):
1.008(1.004,1.013]
lag 0
1.004(1.000,1.009]
lag 1
1.004(1.000,1.009]
lag 2
1.009(1.005,1.014]
lag 3
1.006(1.001,1.011]
lag 4
1.002(0.998,1.007]
lag 5
1.009(1.004,1.014]
lag 0-1
1.012(1.007,1.018]
lag 0-2
1.017(1.011,1.022]
lag 0-3
1.020(1.014,1.026]
lag 0-4
1.021(1.015,1.028]
lag 0-5
Asthma in Age
0-14: 1.024(1.013,1.034]
lag 0-5
14-65: 1.018(1.008,1.029]
lag 0-5
>65:1.021(1.012,1.030]
lag 0-4
Asthma-Cold Season: 1.139(1.043,
1.244] lag 0-5
July 2009
E-329
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Lee et al. (2006, 090176)
Period of Study: 1/1997-12/2002
Location: Hong Kong, China
Hospital Admission
Outcome: Asthma (493)
Age Groups: < 18 years
Study Design: Time series
N: 26,663 asthma admissions for asthma
and 5821 admissions for influenza
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
regression, GAM
Covariates: Temperature, atmospheric
pressure, relative humidity
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS 8.02
Lags Considered: 0-5
Notes: Controls were admissions for
influenza ICD9 487
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-hs
Mean (SD): 45.3/yg/m3, (16.2)
Percentiles: 25th: 33.4
50th(Median): 43.0
75th: 54.0
Range (Min, Max): NR
Monitoring Stations: 10
Copollutant (correlation):
PM2.B-PM10: 0.89
PM2.B-SO2: 0.48
PM2.B-PJO2: 0.74
PM2.B-O3: 0.47
PM Increment: IQr - 20.6/yglm3
Percent increase:
Single pollutant model:
5.10[2.95,7.30], lag 0
5.00[2.88,7.16], lag 1
5.48(2.75, 6.95], lag 2
4.83(2.78, 6.93], lag 3
6.59(4.51,8.72], lag 4
5.24(3.18,7.34 ], lag 5
Multipollutant model (SO2, NO2, CO, O3)
3.24(0.93, 5.60], lag 4
Reference: Letz and Quinn (2005,
088752)
Period of Study: Oct 1, 2001-Aug 24,
2002
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Emergency Dept Visits
Outcome (ICD-9): Asthma or reactive
airway disease (493.0-493.9), wheezing
(786.07), dyspnea (786.01-786.9),
shortness of breath (786.05), bronchitis
(490-496), or cough (786.2)
Age Groups: NR (basic air force trainees)
Study Design: Historic (retrospective)
cohort
N: 149 ED visits
Statistical Analyses: Pearson
correlation
Covariates: NR
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SPSS
Lags Considered: NR
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-h AQI
AQI Range (min-max): (
4-109)
Monitoring Stations: Data obtained
from the Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality
Copollutant (correlation): NR
PM Increment: NR
Correlation with Outcomes:
Same-day
All visits: r - 0.082
Proven asthmatic events: r - -0.042
3-day
All visits: r - 0.097
Proven asthmatic events: r - 0.011
Reference: Lin et al. (2005, 087828)
Period of Study: 1998-2001
Location: Toronto, North York, East
York, Etobicoke, Scarborough, and York
(Canada)
Hospital Admissions
Outcome (ICD-9): Respiratory infections
including laryngitis, tracheitis, bronchitis,
bronchiolitis, pneumonia, and influenza
(464, 466, 480-487)
Age Groups: 0-14 yrs
Study Design: Bidirectional case-
crossover
N: 6782 respiratory infection
hospitalizations
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression (Cox proportional
hazards model)
Covariates: Daily mean temp and dew
point temp
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS 8.2 PHREG
procedure
Lags Considered: 1-7 day averages
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (min-max):
9.59 (0.25-50.50)
SD - 7.06
Monitoring Stations: 4
Copollutant (correlation): PMio 2.5:
r - 0.33
PM10: r - 0.87
CO: r - 0.10
SO2: r - 0.47
NO2: r - 0.48
O3: r - 0.56
PM Increment: 7.8/yglm3
OR Estimate [CI]:
Adjusted for weather
4 day avg: 1.11 [1.02,1.22]
6 day avg: 1.11 [1.00,1.24]
Adj for weather and other gaseous
pollutants
4 day avg: 0.94 [0.81,1.08]
6 day avg: 0.90 [0.76,1.07]
Notes: OR's were also categorized into
"Boys" and "Girls," yielding similar results
July 2009
E-330
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Lin et al.
(2002, 026067)
Period of Study: Jan 1,1981 -Dec 31,
1993
Location: Toronto
Hospital Admissions
Outcome (ICD-9): Asthma (493)
Age Groups: 6-12 yrs
Study Design: Uni- and bi directional
case-crossover (UCC, BCC) and time-
series (TS)
N: 7,319 asthma admissions
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression, GAM
Covariates: Maximum and minimum
temp, avg relative humidity
Season: Apr-Sep, Oct-Mar
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 1-7 day averages
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 6 days (predicted daily
values)
Mean (min-max):
17.99 (1.22-89.59)
SD - 8.49
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation):
PMio: r - 0.87
PM 10-2.5: r - 0.44
CO: r - 0.45
SO?: r - 0.46
NO?: r - 0.50
O3: r - 0.21
PM Increment: 9.3 /yglm3
RR Estimate [CI]:
Adj for weather and gaseous pollutants
BCC 5 day avg: 0.94 [0.85,1.03]
BCC 6 day avg: 0.92 [0.83,1.02]
TS 5 day avg: 0.96 [0.90,1.02]
TS 6 day avg: 0.94 [0.88,1.01]
Boys-adj for weather
UCC 1 day avg: 1.09(1.04,1.15]
UCC 2 day avg: 1.09(1.02,1.16]
BCC 1 day avg: 1.01 [0.97,1.06]
BCC 2 day avg: 0.99 [0.93,1.05]
TS 1 day avg: 1.00 [0.97,1.04]
TS 2 day avg: 0.98 [0.94,1.02]
Girls-adj for weather
UCC 1 day avg: 1.06 [0.99,1.14]
UCC 2 day avg: 1.11 [1.02,1.21]
BCC 1 day avg: 0.99 [0.93,1.06]
BCC 2 day avg: 1.02 [0.94,1.09]
TS 1 day avg: 0.99 [0.95,1.04]
TS 2 day avg: 1.00 [0.95,1.06]
Notes: The author also provides RR using
UCC, BCC, and TS analysis for female
and male groups for days 3-7, yielding
similar results
Reference: Magas et al. (2007, 090714) Hospital Admission/ED: Admissions
Period of Study: 2001-2003
Location: Oklahoma City Metro area,
Oklahoma and Cleveland counties
Outcome: Asthma 493.01-493.99
Age Groups: < 15 yrs
Study Design: Time series
N: 1,270 admissions
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h avg
Mean (SD): NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Monitoring Stations: 10
Statistical Analyses:
regression
Covariates: Temperature, humidity,
pollen count, mold
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 1
ive binomial Copollutant (correlation): NR
Notes: Coefficient for PM2.6 was not
significant and thus not reported.
July 2009
E-331
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Mohr et al. (2008,180215) Outcome: Asthma ER Visits
Period of Study: Jun 2001 - May 2003 Age Groups: 2-17 yrs
Location: St. Louis, M0 Study Design: Time series
Statistical Analyses: GEE Poisson
models
Covariates: season, weekend exposure,
ns
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 1d
Pollutant: PM2.6EC
Averaging Time: 24 h
Std Dev: 0.1
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant: NO., SO2, O3
Co-pollutant Correlation
NO,: 0.68*
SO2: 0.09
O3: -0 06
*pn0.05
PM Increment: 0.1 /yglm3
Relative Risk Effect (Lower CI, Upper
CI):
Weekend Exposure
Summer: 1.05 (1.00,1.11)
Fall: 0.99 (0.97,1.01)
Winter: 0.96(0.92,1.00)
Spring: 0.96 (0.92,1.00)
Weekday Exposure
Summer: 1.01 (0.98,1.03)
Fall: 1.00 (0.99,1.01)
Winter: 0.99(0.96,1.01)
Spring: 0.98 (0.96,1.01)
Reference: Neuberger et al. (2004,
093249)
Period of Study: 1999-2000 (1 yr
period)
Location: Vienna and Lower Austria
Hospital Admissions
Outcome (ICD-9): Bronchitis,
emphysema, asthma, bronchiectasis,
extrinsic allergic alveolitis, and chronic
airway obstruction (490-496)
Age Groups: 3.0-5.9 yrs
7-10 yrs
65 +
Study Design: Time series
N: 366 days (admissions NR)
Statistical Analyses: GAM
Covariates: SO2, NO, NO2, O3,
temperature, humidity, and day of the
week
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: S-Plus 2000
Lags Considered: 0-14 days
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Maximum daily mean:
Vienna: 96.4
Rural area: 48.0
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant (correlation): NR
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Log Relative Rate Estimate (p-value):
Vienna
Male: 2 day lag - 5.467(0.019)
Female: 3 day lag - 5.596 (0.009)
Rural
Male: 10 day lag - 9.893 (0.012)
Female: 11 day lag - 10.529 (0.011)
Association with tidal lung functioN:
P - -0.987 (p-value - 0.091)
Notes: Effect parameters with significant
coefficients for respiratory health
included: male sex, allergy, asthma in
family, and traffic for Vienna and age,
allergy, asthma in family, passive
smoking, and PM fraction for the rural
area. Effect parameters with significant
coefficients for log asthma score were
allergy, asthma in family, and rain for
Vienna and allergy, asthma in family, and
passive smoking for the rural area. Cross-
correlation coefficients are provided in Fig
1.
July 2009
E-332
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ostro et al. (2008, 097971)
Period of Study: 2000-2003
Location: Six California Counties
Outcome: Respiratory disease (ICD-9
460-519)
Study Design: Time-Series
Statistical Analysis: Poisson
Regression
Statistical Package: R
Age Groups: Children < 19
Pollutant: PM2.6 and components
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean (SD) Unit: 19.4//gfm3
IQR: 14.6 //g/m3
Copollutants:
EC, 0C, NO?, S04, Cu, Fe, K, Si, Zn
Increment: NR
Relative Risk (Min CI, Max CI)
Lag
Full results are presented graphically in
Figures 1 and 2.
Excess risks for all-year respiratory
hospital admissions in children < 19yrs,
3d lag
PM2.6: 4.1% (1.8-6.4)
EC: 5.4% (0.8-10.3)
Fe: 4.7% (2.2-7.2)
0C: 3.4% (1.1-5.7)
Nitrates: 3.3% (1.1-5.5)
Sulfates: 3.0% (0.4-5.7)
Excess risks for cool season (Oct - Mar)
respiratory hospital admissions in children
< 19yrs, 3d lag
PM2.6: 5.1% (1.6-8.9)
EC: 6.8% (-0.2-14.2)
Fe: 4.8% (1.7-8.0)
K: 4.0% (0.3-7.7)
July 2009
E-333
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Slaughter et al. (2005,
073854)
Period of Study: January 1995 through
June 2001
Location: Spokane, WA
Hospital Admissions and ED visits
Outcome: All respiratory (460-519)
Asthma (493)
C0PD (491,492, 494,496)
Pneumonia (480-487)
Acute URI not including colds and
sinusitis (464, 466,490)
Age Groups: All, 15+ years for C0PD
Study Design: Time series
N: 2373 visit records
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
regression, GLM with natural splines. For
comparison also used GAM with
smoothing splines and default
convergence criteria.
Covariates: Season, temperature,
relative humidity, day of week
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated?: No
Statistical Package: SAS, SPLUS
Lags Considered: 1 -3 d
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h avg
Range (90% of Concentrations):
4.2-20.2 /yglm3
Monitoring Stations:
One
Notes: Copollutant (correlation):
PMir - 0.95
PMior - 0.62
PMio-2.5 r - 0.31
CO r - 0.62
Temperature r - 0.21
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
ER visits:
PM2.6
All Respiratory
PM2.6 Lag 1: 1.01 [0.98,1.04]
Lag 2: 1.02 [0.99,1.04]
Lag 3: 1.02 [0.99,1.05]
Acute Asthma
Lag 1: 1.03 [0.98,1.09]
Lag 2: 1.00 [0.95,1.05]
Lag 3: 1.01 [0.96,1.06]
C0PD (adult)
Lag 1: 0.96 [0.89,1.04]
Lag 2: 1.01 [0.93,1.09]
Lag 3: 1.00 [0.93,1.08]
Hospital Admissions:
PM2.6
All Respiratory
Lag 1: 0.98[0.94,1.01]
Lag 2: 0.99 [0.96,1.03]
Lag 3: 1.01 [0.98,1.05]
Asthma
Lag 1: 1.01 [0.91, 1.11]
Lag 2: 1.03 [0.94,1.13]
Lag 3: 1.02 [0.93,1.13]
C0PD (adult)
Lag 1: 0.99 [0.91,1.08]
Lag 2: 1.06 [0.98,1.16]
Lag 3: 1.03 [0.94,1.12]
July 2009
E-334
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Tecer et al. (2008,180030) Outcome: ED visits for respiratory
problems (ICD-9 470-478, 493)
Period of Study: 1212004-101
Study Design: Bidirectional Case-
Location: Zonguldak, T urkey crossover
Covariates: Daily meteorological
parameters
Statistical Analysis: Conditional logistic
regression
Statistical Package: Stata
Age Groups: 0-14 years
Pollutant: PM2.6
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Averaging Time: NR
Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Mean, Unit: 29.1 /yglm3
Asthma
Range (Min, Max): 4.55, 95.65
Lag 0:1.15 (0.99-1.34)
Copollutant (correlation):
Lag 1:0.85 (0.70-1.03)
PM2.6/PM10
Lag 2: 0.87 (0.73-1.04)
Mean: 0.56
Lag 3: 0.93 (0.79-1.10)
Range: 0.17-0.88
Lag 4:1.25 (1.05-1.50)
PM2.6/PM10-2.6
Allergic Rhinitis with Asthma
Mean: 1.49
Lag 0:1.21 (1.10-1.33)
Range: 0.21-7.53
Lag 1:0.84 (0.75-0.93)
Lag 2: 0.89 (0.81-0.98)
Lag 3: 0.99 (0.90-1.09)
Lag 4:1.06 (0.95-1.19)
Allergic Rhinitis
Lag 0:1.08 (0.98-1.20)
Lag 1:1.03 (0.93-1.13)
Lag 2: 0.89 (0.80-0.99)
Lag 3: 0.98 (0.89-1.09)
Lag 4:1.18 (1.00-1.24)
Upper Respiratory Disease
Lag 0: 0.99 (0.49-2.00)
Lag 1:0.52 (0.22-1.20)
Lag 2:1.29 (0.75-2.22)
Lag 3:1.29 (0.69-2.43)
Lag 4:1.47 (0.87-2.50)
Lower Respiratory Disease
Lag 0:1.06 (0.78-1.44)
Lag 1:0.85 (0.59-1.22)
Lag 2:1.08 (0.72-1.61)
Lag 3:1.18 (0.92-1.52)
Lag 4: 0.72 (0.54-0.96)h
July 2009
E-335
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Tolbert et al. (2007,
090316)
Period of Study: August 1998-
December 2004
Location: Atlanta Metropolitan area,
Georgia
Outcome (ICD-9):
Combined RD group, including:
Asthma (493, 786.07, 786.09), C0PD
(491, 492, 496), URI (460-465,460.0,
477), pneumonia (480-486), and
bronchiolitis (466.1, 466.11, and
466.19))
Age Groups: All
Study Design: Time series
N:NR for 1998-2004.
For 1993-2004:10,234,490 ER visits
(283,360 and 1,072,429 visits included
in the CVD and RD groups, respectively)
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
generalized linear models
Covariates: long-term temporal trends,
season (for RD outcome), temperature,
dew point, days of week, federal
holidays, hospital entry and exit
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated: No
Statistical Package: SAS version 9.1
Lags Considered: 3-day moving
0-2)
July 2009
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (median
IQR, range, 10th—90th percentiles):
PMz.b: 17.1 (15.6
11.0-21.9
0.8-65.8
7.9-28.8)
PM2.6 sulfate: 4.9 (3.9
2.4-6.2
0.5-21.9
1.7-9.5)
PM2.6 organic carbon: 4.4 (3.8
2.7-5.3
0.4-25.9
2.1-7.2)
PM2.6 elemental carbon: 1.6 (1.3
0.9-2.0
0.1-11.9
0.6-3.0)
PM2.6 water-soluble metals: 0.030 (0.023
0.014-0.039
0.003-0.202
0.009-0.059)
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation): Between
PM2.6 and:
PM10: r - 0.84
O3: r - 0.62
NO2: r - 0.47
CO: r - 0.47
SO2: r - 0.17
PMio-2.5: r - 0.47;
PM2.6 SO4: r - 0.76;
PM2.6 EC: r - 0.65;
PM2.6 0C: r - 0.70;
PM2.6 TC: r - 0.71;
PM2.6 water-sol metals:
r - 0.69
0HC: r - 0.50
Between PM2.6 SO4 and: PM10: r - 0.69
O3: r - 0.56
NO2: r - 0.14
CO: r - 0.14
SO2: r - 0.09
PMio-2.5: r - 0.32;
PM2.6: r - 0.76;
PM2.6 EC: r - 0.32;
;'3?'fel2.B 0C: r - 0.33;
PM2.6 TC: r - 0.34;
PM2.6 water-sol metals:
PM Increment:
PM2.6:10.96/yglm3 (IQR)
PM2.6 sulfate: 3.82/yg/m3 (IQR)
PM2.6 total carbon: 3.63//g|m3 (IQR)
PM2.6 organic carbon: 2.61 //g|m3 (IQR)
PM2.6 elemental carbon: 1.15 /yg/m3 (IQR)
PM2.6 water-soluble metals: 0.03 /yglm3
(IQR)
Risk ratio [95% CI] (single pollutant
models):
PM2.6:
RD: 1.005[0.995-1.015]
PM2.6 sulfate:
RD: 1.007 [0.996-1.018]
PM2.6 total carbon:
RD: 1.001 [0.993-1.008]
PM2.E organic carbon:
RD: 1.003(0.995-1.011]
PM2.E elemental carbon:
RD: 0.996(0.989-1.004]
PM2.E water-soluble metals:
RD: 1.005 [0.995-1.015]
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Wong et al. (2006, 093266)
Period of Study: 2000-2002
Location: Hong Kong (8 districts)
General Practitioner Visits
Outcome (ICPC-2): Respiratory
diseasesfsymptoms: upper respiratory
tract infections (URTI), lower respiratory
infections, influenza, asthma, COPD,
allergic rhinitis, cough, and other
respiratory diseases
Age Groups: All ages
Study Design: Time series
N: 269,579 visits
Statistical Analyses: GAM, Poisson
regression
Covariates: Season, day of the week,
climate
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: S-Plus
Lags Considered: 0-3 days
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (min-max):
35.7(9-120)
SD - 16.7
Monitoring Stations: 1 per district
Copollutant (correlation):
PMio: r - 0.94
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
RR Estimate [CI]:
Overall URTI
1.021 [1.010,1.032]
Notes: RRs are also reported for each
individual general practitioner yielding
similar results
Reference: Yang Q et al. (2004,
087488)
Period of Study: Jun 1,1995-Mar 31,
1999
Location: Vancouver area, British
Columbia
Hospital Admissions
Outcome (ICD-9): Respiratory (
(460-519), pneumonia only (480-486),
asthma only (493)
Age Groups: 0-3 yrs
Study Design: Case control, bidirectional
case-crossover (BCC), and time series
(TS)
N: 1610 cases
Statistical Analyses: Chi-square test,
Logistic regression, GAM (time-series),
GLM with parametric natural cubic
splines
Covariates: Gender, socioeconomic
status, weekday, season, study year,
influenza epidemic month
Season: Spring, summer, fall, winter
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS (Case control
and BCC), S-Plus (TS)
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (min-max):
7.7 (2.0-32.0)
SD - 3.7
Monitoring Stations: NR (data obtained
from Greater Vancouver Regional District
Air Quality Dept)
Copollutant (correlation):
PMio: r = 0.83
PM 10-2.5: r - 0.39
CO: r - 0.24
O3: r = -0.03
NO?: r - 0.37
SO2: r - 0.43
PM Increment: 4.0 /yglm3 (IQR)
OR Estimate [CI]:
Values NR
Notes: Author states that no significant
association was found between PM2.6
and respiratory disease hospitalizations.
Lags Considered: 0-7 days
July 2009
E-337
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Zanobetti and Schwartz
(2006,090195)
Period of Study: 1995-1999
Location: Boston, MA
Hospital Admission/ED:
Outcome: Pneumonia (480-487)
Age Groups: >65 y
Study Design: Case-crossover, time
stratified
N: 24,857 for Pneumonia
Statistical Analyses: Condition logistic
regression
Covariates: Season, long term trend, day
of-the-wk, mean temperature, relative
humidity, barometric pressure, extinction
coefficient
Season: All year
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 0-1
Notes: Also looked at Ml cohort
Pollutant: PM non-traffic
Averaging Time: 24 h
Percentiles (pneumonia cohort):
5th:-7.3
25th:-3.28 //g/m3
50th(Median): -0.88
75th: 1.92
95th: 12.11
PM Component: BC
Monitoring Stations: 4-5 monitors
Copollutant (correlation):
PM non-traffic:
PM2.6
r - 0.74
CO
r - -0.01
NO?
r - 0.14
0s
r - -0.47
BC
r - -0.01
PM Increment: PM non-traffic lag 0:
13.44 //g/m3
PM non-traffic lag 0-1 avg: 10.28 /yglm3
% change in Pneumonia:
PM non-traffic-0.57 [-7.51, 6.36]
lag 0
PM non-traffic-0.94 [-7.20, 5.32]
mean lag 1
Reference: Zhong et al. (2006, 093264)
Period of Study: Apr-Oct 2002
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Hospital Admissions
Outcome (ICD-9): Asthma (493-493.91)
Age Groups: 1-18 yrs
Study Design: Time series
N: 1254 admissions
Statistical Analyses: Poisson multiple
regression, GAM
Covariates: Season, temperature,
humidity, ozone, day of the week
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 1-5 days
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD):
Apr: 12.4 (3.8)
May: 13.6(5.8)
Jun: 21.6(9.9)
Jul: 25.8(11.9)
Aug: 20.3 (8.7)
Sep: 19.5(11.1)
Oct: 12.8(6.4)
Monitoring Stations: NR (data obtained
from the National Virtual Data System)
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Notes: Author states all pairwise
correlations were insignificant
PM Increment: NR
RR Estimate [CI]:
Notes: This study focused primarily on
aeroallergens and asthma visits
July 2009
E-338
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Zanobetti and Schwartz
(2006,090195)
Period of Study: 1995-1999
Location: Boston, MA
Outcome: Pneumonia (480-487)
Age Groups: >65 y
Study Design: Case-crossover, time
stratified
N: 24,857 for Pneumonia
Statistical Analyses: Condition logistic
regression
Covariates: Season, long term trend, day
of-the-wk, mean temperature, relative
humidity, barometric pressure, extinction
coefficient
Season: All year
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 0-1
Notes: Also looked at Ml cohort
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Percentiles (pneumonia cohort):
25th: 7.23//g/m3
50th(Median): 11.10
75th: 16.14
PM Component: Black Carbon (BC), PM
non-traffic
Monitoring Stations:
4-5 monitors
Copollutant (correlation):
PM2.b:
CO
r - 0.52
NO?
r - 0.55
0s
r - 0.20
BC
r - 0.66
PM non-traffic
r - 0.74
PM Increment: PM2.6 lag 0: 17.17 /yglm3
PM2.6 lag 0-1 avg: 16.32 //g/m3
% change in Pneumonia:
6.48[1.13,11.43]
lag 0
5.561-0.45,11.27]
mean lag 1
All units expressed in uillm unless otherwise specified.
July 2009
E-339
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table E-15. Short-term exposure-respiratory-ED/HA-Other Size Fractions
Concentrations'
Study
Design & Methods
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Andersen et al. (2007,
093201)
Period of Study: 2001-2004
Location: Copenhagen, Sweden
Outcome (ICD10): Respiratory disease
(J41-46)
Asthma (J45, 46)
Age Groups: 5-18 and > 65
Study Design: Time-series
N:1327 days
— 1.5 million people at-risk
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
regression, GAM.
Covariates: influenza epidemics, pollen,
temperature, dew point, day-of-week,
holiday, season.
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: R with gam and
mgcv packages.
Lags Considered: 0-5
Pollutant: Number concentration (NC) of
ultrafine & accumulation mode particles
Averaging Time: 24-h
Mean particles/cm3 (SD): NCtot (total):
8116(3502)
25th: 4959
50th 6243
75th: 8218
99th: 16189
IQR: 3259
NC100 (< 100 nm): 6847 (2864)
25th: 5738
50th (Median): 7358
75th: 9645
99th: 19895
IQR: 3907
Mean particles/cm3 for four size modes
(median diameter (nm) noted):
NCa12: 493(315)
NCa23: 2253(1364)
NCa57: 5104 (2687)
NCa212: 6847 (2864)
Monitoring Stations: 3 (Background,
rural Background, urban Curbside, urban)
Notes: NC exposure data available for
n - 578 days. Information on distribution
of 4 size modes provided in the paper.
Copollutant (correlation):
NCtot and PMio: r - 0.39
NCtot and PM2.6: r - 0.40
NCtot and NO2: r - 0.68
PM10 and PM2.6: r - 0.8
"Low or no" correlations between 4 size
modes
NCa212 and PM2.6: r - 0.8
NCa212 and PM10: r - 0.63
NCa57 and NO2: r - 0.57
Notes: selected correlations reported in
text, all correlations in annex to the
manuscript
PM Increment: Based on the IQR,
specific to metric (see below).
RR Estimate:
Single pollutant results, Asthma, (5-18
yrs), lag 0-5:
PM2.6:1.15 [1,1.32], IQr - 5
NCtot: 1.07 [0.98,1.17], IQr - 3907
NC100:1.06 [0.97,1.16], IQr - 3259
NCa12:1.08 [0.99, 1.18], IQr - 342
NCa212: 1.08 [1,1.17], IQr - 495
NCa23:1.09 [0.98, 1.21], IQr - 1786
NCa57:1.02 [0.94, 1.12], IQr - 3026
2-pollutant results:
NCa212 w/ PM10:1.1 [0.96,1.13], IQr
- 495
NCtot w/ PM10:1.03 [0.92,1.15]
NCtot w/ PM2.6: 1.04 [0.85,1.28]
All RD, (> 65 yrs), lag 0-4, single
pollutant results:
PM2.6: 1 [0.95,1.05]
NCtot: 1.04 [1,1.07] IQr- 3907
NC100:1.03 [0.99,1.07], IQr - 3259
NC12: 1.01 [0.98,1.05], IQr - 342
NC212: 1.04(1.01,1.08], IQr-495
NCa23: 0.99[0.94,1.03], IQr - 1786
NCa57: 1.04 [1,1.08], IQr - 3026
2-pollutant results:
NCa212w/PMio: 1.01 [0.96,1.07], IQr
- 495
NCtot w/ PM2.6: 0.97(0.89,1.05]
NCtot w/ PM10:1 [0.96,1.05]
Notes: Multipollutant model results also
included for models with 4 size modes.
July 2009
E-340
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Agarwal et al. (2006,
099086)
Period of Study: 2000-2003
Location: Safdarjung area of Delhi
Outcome (ICD-NR): C0PD, asthma,
emphysema
Age Groups: NR
Study Design: Time series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: Kruskal-Wallis
one way analysis, Chi-square,
Multivariate linear regression
Covariates: Temp (min & max), relative
humidity at 0830 and 1730 h, wind
speed
Season: I (Jan-Mar), II (Apr-Jun), III (Jul-
Sep), IV (Oct-Dec)
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: SPSS
Lags Considered: NR
Pollutant: SPM (Suspended PM)
Averaging Time: 8 h
Mean/zg/nr1 (SD):
Qtr I: 297.5 (34.6)
~tr II: 398.0(85.6)
Qtr III: 220.0(78.0)
Qtr IV: 399.0(54.6)
Monitoring Stations: 2
Copollutant (correlation): RSPM:
r - 0.771
Other variables:
RH0830: r - -0.482
RH1730: r - -0.531
COPD: r - 0.474
PM Increment: NR
RR Estimate [CI]: NR
Notes: This study analyzed seasonal
variation of pollutants and health
outcomes and correlations among the
variables
Reference: Agarwal et al. (2006,
099086)
Period of Study: 2000-2003
Location: Safdarjung area of Delhi
Outcome (ICD-NR): COPD, asthma,
emphysema
Age Groups: NR
Study Design: Time series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: Kruskal-Wallis
one-way analysis, Chi-square,
Multivariate linear regression
Covariates: Temp (min & max), relative
humidity at 0830 and 1730 h, wind
speed
Season: I (Jan-Mar), II (Apr-Jun), III (Jul-
Sep), IV (Oct-Dec)
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: SPSS
Lags Considered: NR
Pollutant: RSPM (Respirable Suspended
PM < 10 /ym)
Averaging Time: 8 h
Mean/zg/nr1 (SD):
Qtr I: 119.0(19.8)
Qtr II: 132.0(28.4)
Qtr III: 75.0 (23.4)
Qtr IV: 168.0(40.6)
Monitoring Stations: 2
Copollutant (correlation): SPM:
r - 0.771
Other variables:
Temp (min): r - -0.420
COPD: r - 0.353
PM Increment: NR
RR Estimate [CI]: NR
Notes: This study analyzed seasonal
variation of pollutants and health
outcomes and correlations among the
variables
July 2009
E-341
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Arbex et al. (2007, 091637)
Period of Study: Mar 2003-Jul 2004
Location: Araraquara, Sao Paulo State,
Brazil
Hospital Admission
Outcome (ICD10): Asthma (J15, J45)
Age Groups: All
Study Design: Time-series
N: 493 days, 1 hospital, 640 admissions
Statistical Analyses: Generalized linear
Poisson regression model with natural
cubic spline, Mann-Whitney U Test
Covariates: Temperature and humidity
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated? Yes,
quintile analysis
Statistical Package: SPSS V.11 &
Splus 4.5
Lags Considered: 0-9
Pollutant: TSP
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 46.8 //gfm3 (24.4)
Range (Min, Max):
6.7-137.8 //g/m3
Monitoring Stations:
1
Notes: TSP used as a proxy for fine &
ultrafine particles since it is composed of
85-95% PM2.6.
Copollutant (correlation): NR
PM Increment: 10//g/m3
% Increase
6.96 [1.4-12.86] 2-d ma
9.090 [3.12-15.40]
3 d ma
10.28 [4.05-16.90]
4-d ma
11.63 [5.46-19.318]
5 d ma
12.61 [5.68-20.00]
6-d ma
12.56 [5.47-20.13]
7-d ma
% Increase by TSP quintile:
9.25-28.45 //g/m3 1.00
28.46-48.85//g/m3:: 1.55 [045-5.77]
48.86-69.06//gfm3:: 2.46 [1.08-5.60]
69.07-88.44//g/m3 2.77 [1.32-5.84]
88.45-108.9//g/m3 2.94 [1.48-5.85]
Notes: No TSP threshold for asthma
admissions noted. Analysis of lag
structure indicated that the acute effect
of TSP on admissions started 1 day after
TSP concentration increase and remained
unchanged for next 4 days.
Notes: To evaluate the association
between TSP generated from burning
sugar cane and asthma hospital
admissions.
Reference: Bartzokas et al. (2004,
093252)
Period of Study: Jun 1,1992-May 31,
2000
Location: Athens, Greece
Outcome: Respiratory and cardiovascular Pollutant: PM4.5 (black smoke)
diseases (combined)
Age Groups: NR
Study Design: Time series
N: 1554 patients
Statistical Analyses: Simple linear
regression and linear stepwise regression,
Pearson correlation
Covariates: Temperature, atmospheric
pressure, relative humidity, wind speed
Season: Warm (May-Sep) and cold (Nov-
Mar)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: NR
Averaging Time: 10-day moving avg
Mean//g/m3 (SD): NR
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation): N
PM Increment: NR
Correlation with Number of
Admissions:
Entire year
Original: r - 0.18
Smoothed: r - 0.31
Warm period
Original: r - 0.19
Smoothed: r - 0.30
Cold period
Original: r - 0.18
Smoothed: r - 0.34
"All above values are statistically
significant
July 2009
E-342
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Erbas et al. (2005, 073849)
Period of Study: Jul 1,1989-Dec 31,
1992
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Outcome (ICD): COPD (490-492,494,
496)
Asthma (493)
Age Groups: NR
Study Design: Time series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: GLM, GAM,
Parameter Driven Poisson Regression,
Transitional Regression, Seasonal-Trend
decomposition based on Loess smoothing
for seasonal adjustment
Covariates: Secular trends, seasonality,
relative humidity, dry bulb temp, dew
point temp
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: S-Plus, SAS
Lags Considered: 0-5 days
Pollutant: PM 0.1-1 (API)
Averaging Time: 24-hs
Mean (min-max): NR
Monitoring Stations: 9
Copollutant (correlation): NR
PM Increment: Increase from the 10th-
90th percentile (value NR)
RR Estimate [CI]:
COPD
GAM:
0.95[0.91,1.00]
GLM, PDM, TRM: NR
Asthma
NR
Notes: This study was used to
demonstrate that conclusions are highly
dependent on the type of model used
Reference: Halonen et al. (2008,
189507)
Period of Study: 1998-2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Outcome: Respiratory Hospitalizations &
Mortality (ICD 10: J00-99)
Age Groups: 65+ yrs
Study Design: time series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: Poisson, GAM
Covariates: temperature, humidity,
influenza epidemics, high pollen episodes,
holidays
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: R
Lags Considered: lags 0-3 & 5d (0-4)
mean
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: daily
Mean (SD): NR
Min: 1.1
25th percentile: 5.5
50th percentile: 9.5
75th percentile: 11.7
Max: 69.5
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: PMco.03, PM0.030.1, PMco.i
PM
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Llorca et al. (2005, 087825)
Period of Study: Jan 1,1992-Dec 31,
1995
Location: Torrelavega, Spain
Outcome (ICD-9): Respiratory (460-519)
and cardiac (390-459) admissions
(analyzed combined and individually)
Age Groups: NR
Study Design: Time series
N: 18,137 admissions
Statistical Analyses: Stepwise multiple
linear regression, Poisson regression,
Spearman correlation
Covariates: Influenza, day of week, wind
speed, northeast and southwest winds,
minimum and maximum temperature
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: STATA
Intercooled, Release 6
Lags Considered: NR
Pollutant: TSP (total suspended
particles)
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean//g/m3 (SD):
48.8 (23.7)
Monitoring Stations: 3
Copollutant (correlation):
SO?: r - -0.400
SH2: r - -0.392
NO: r - -0.109
NO2: r - -0.120
Other variables:
Rain: r - -0.339
Max temp: r - 0.071
Min temp: r - -0.003
Avg temp: r - 0.035
Wind speed: r - -0.357
PM Increment: NR
Rate Ratio Estimate [CI]:
Cardiorespiratory Admissions
Single-pollutant model: 0.92 [0.86,0.98]
Five-pollutant model: 1.05 [0.97,1.14]
Respiratory Admissions
Single-pollutant model: 0.98 [0.89,1.08]
Five-pollutant model: 0.91 [0.80,1.02]
Reference: Michaud et al. (2004,
089900)
Period of Study: Jan 1997-May 2001
Location: Hilo, Hawaii
ED visits
Outcome:
Asthma/COPD (490-496)
Respiratory Irritation (506-508)
Age Groups: All
Study Design: Time-series
N: 1,561 ER visits
Statistical Analyses: Multiple linear
regression
Covariates: Hourly temperature,
minimum daily temperature, minimum
daily temperature, humidity, year, month,
day of the week
Season: all
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package:
STATA 6.0
SAS
Lags Considered: Previous night, 1,2,3
Pollutant: PMi
Averaging Time: 24 h avg
Mean (SD): 1.91 (2.95)//g/m3
Range (Min, Max):
0.0, 56.6/yglm3
Monitoring Stations:
2
Notes: Copollutant (correlation): NR
PM Increment: 10//g/m3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Asthma, C0PD (499-496): Adjusted for
day, month & year:
1.11 (0.92,1.34), 00: 00-6: 00AM
1.14(1.03,1.26), lag 1
1.06(0.83, 0.94), lag 2
0.91 (0.06,1.05), lag 3
Asthma (493, 495): Adjusted for day,
month &year:
1.03(0.90,1.42), 00: 00-6: 00AM
1.02(0.94,1.21), lag 1
1.02(0.99,1.23), lag 2
0.97 (0.69,1.15), lag 3
Bronchitis (490, 491): Adjusted for day,
month &year:
1.02(0.82,1.41), 00: 00-6: 00AM
1.07 (1.18,1.49), lag 1
0.97 (0.60,1.34), lag 2
0.93(0.43,1.18), lag 3
Notes: Crude and estimates adjusted for
month and year only also presented.
Notes: Volcanic fog - vog
July 2009
E-344
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Migliaretti et al. (2005,
088689)
Period of Study: 1997-1999
Location: Turin, Italy
Outcome:
Cases: Asthma (493)
Controls: admissions for non respiratory
or cardiac conditions (460-487, 490-493,
494-496, 500-519, 390-405,410-429)
Age Groups: 0-14,15-64, >64
Study Design: Case-control
N: Cases: 1,401
Controls: 201,071
Statistical Analyses: Logistic regression
Covariates: Gender, age, daily mean
temperature, season, day of week,
holidays, education level
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated? No
Lag: 0-2 d avg
Pollutant: TSP
Averaging Time: Means of daily total
levels at stations
Mean (SD): 105.3//g/m3, (44.2)
Percentiles: 25th: NR
50th(Median): 96.0 //g|m3
75th NR
Monitoring Stations:
10
Notes: Copollutant (correlation): All
seasons:
NOs-TSP - 0.80
Winter:
NOs-TSP - 0.77
summer:
NOs-TSP - 0.69
PM Increment: 10//g|m3 increase
% Increase, lag 0-2 d avg
1 pollutant model:
<15:1.90[0.40,3.40]
15-64:2.30 [-0.01,5.20]
>64:2.30[1.10, 3.60]
Total: 2.30(1.10, 3.60]
% Increase, lag 0-2 d avg
2 pollutant model:
<15:-0.12 [-0.03, 2.50]
15-64:0.90 [-0.04,5.61]
>64:1.21-0.01,4.32]
Total: 0.91 [-0.02,3.11]
Reference: Migliaretti et al. (2004,
087425)
Period of Study: 1997-1999
Location: Turin, Italy
Outcome:
Cases: Asthma (493)
Controls: non-respiratory or cardiac
admissions (460-487, 490-493, 494-496,
500-519, 390-405,410-429)
Age Groups: 0-15
Study Design: Case-control
N: Cases: 1,060
Controls: 25,523
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression //g|m3 increase
Covariates: Gender, age, daily mean
temperature, season, day of week,
holidays, solar radiation
Season: All
Lags Considered: 1-3 d avg
Pollutant: Total suspended particulate
Averaging Time: Mean of admission day
and 3 preceding days
Mean(SD): 114.5//g/m3, (42.8)
Percentiles:
25th: NR
50th(Median): 109.9 //g/m3
75th: NR
Monitoring Stations:
10
Notes: Copollutant (correlation): TSP-
NO: 0.76
PM Increment: 10//g/m3
% Increase, lag 1-3 d avg
< 4 yrs: 1.8% [0.00, 3.05]
4-15 yrs: 3.0% [0.01,5.08]
all: 1.8% [0.03, 3.02]
adjusted for all covariates
Notes: Multipollutant models also used
July 2009
E-345
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Neuberger et al. (2004,
093249)
Period of Study: 1999-2000 (1 yr
period)
Location: Vienna and Lower Austria
Outcome (ICD-9): Bronchitis,
emphysema, asthma, bronchiectasis,
extrinsic allergic alveolitis, and chronic
airway obstruction (490-496)
Age Groups: 3.0-5.9 yrs
7-1 0 yrs
65 +
Study Design: Time series
N: 366 days (admissions NR)
Statistical Analyses: GAM
Covariates: SO2, NO, NO2, O3,
temperature, humidity, and day of the
week
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: S-Plus 2000
Lags Considered: 0-14 days
Pollutant: PM1
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean/yglnv1 (SD): NR
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant (correlation): I
PM Increment: NR
Effect parameters (Vienna children):
Respiratory Health
Male sex - 0.098
Allergy - 0.238
Asthma in family - 0.190
Traffic - 0.112
Log Asthma Score
Allergy - 0.210
Asthma in family - 0.112
Rain - 0.257
"only significant coefficients are
presented
Association with tidal lung function:
P - -1.059 (p-value - 0.060)
Notes: No significant associations
between PM and respiratory mortality
were found for either sex. Data is also
provided for children in the rural area
where age, allergy, asthma in family,
passive smoking, and PM fraction had
significant coefficients.
Reference: Peel et al. (2005, 056305)
Period of Study: Jan 1993-Aug 2000
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Hospital Admission/ED:
ED visits
Outcome: Asthma 493, 786.09
C0PD 491,492, 496
URI 460-466, 477
Pneumonia 480-486
Age Groups: All ages. Secondary
analyses conducted by age group: Infants
0-1 yrs
Pediatric asthma 2-18 yrs
Adults > 18 yrs
Study Design: Case-control
All respiratory disease vs. finger wounds
N: 31 hospitals
ED visits NR
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
generalized linear models
General linear models
Covariates: Avg temperature and dew
point, pollen counts
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated? yes
Statistical Package: SAS 8.3
S-Plus 2000
Lags Considered: 0-7 days and 14 day
distributed lag
Pollutant: UF (10-10Onm)
Averaging Time: 24 h avg
Mean (SD): 3800 (40700)
Percentiles:
10th: 11500
90th: 74600
PM Component: Oxygenated
hydrocarbons (OH), sulfate, acidity,
elemental carbon (EC), organic carbon
(0C), water-soluble transition metals
Monitoring Stations: "Several"
Copollutant (correlation):
PM10: r - -0.13
0s: r - -0.13
NO2: r - 0.26
CO: r - 0.10
SO2: r - 0.24
PM2.6: r - -0.16
PM10 2.5: r - 0.13
Increment:
30,000 #/cm3
All Respiratory Disease
0.984 [0.968-1.000]
URI
0.986[0.966,1.006]
Asthma
0.999(0.977,1.021]
Pneumonia
0.997(0.953,1.002]
C0PD
0.982(0.942,1.022]
July 2009
E-346
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Simpson et al. (2005,
087438)
Period of Study: 1996-1999
Location: Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne,
and Perth, Australia
Outcome: All Respiratory (460-519)
Asthma (493)
COPD (490-492)
Pneumonia, acute bronchitis (466, 480-
486)
Age Groups: All ages, split into f15-64
and > 64 yrs
Study Design: Time-series
N: NR —64,000 admissions
Statistical Analyses: GAM wf LOESS
smoothers
GLM wf natural and penalized spline
smoothers
Covariates: Temperature, relative
humidity, rain, day of the week, public
and school holidays, influenza epidemics,
and controlled burn events
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: S-Plus
R Lags Considered: 1-3, 0-1 avg
Pollutant: BSP (indicator of particles
< 2 /jm in diameter)
(10 ^ m ')
Averaging Time: 24 h avg
Mean (SD): Means only
Brisbane 0.3 10 m
Sydney 0.3 10 m
Melbourne 0.3 10 m ''
Perth 0.3 10 ^ m 1
Range (Min, Max):
Brisbane 0.0, 2.5 10 m ''
Sydney 0.0,1.6 10 ^m 1
Melbourne 0.0, 2.2 10 m
Perth 0.1,1.8 10 ^ m 1
PM Component: Monitoring Stations:
"network of sites across each city"
Notes: Copollutant (correlation): NR
PM Increment: "per unit increase"
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Single pollutant model
Respiratory >64 yrs
1.0401 [1.0045,1.0770] Iag1
1.0520(1.0164,1.0889] Iag2;
1.0451 [1.0093,1.0821] Iag3
1.0552(1.0082,1.1045] lag 0-1 avg
Asthma 15-64 yrs
1.0641 [1.0006,1.1315] Iag2
1.0893(1.0240,1.1587] Iag3
Asthma + COPD >64 yrs
1.0713(1.0179,1.1276] Iag3
1.0552(1.0082,1.1045] lag 0-1 avg
Pneumonia & Acute Bronchitis >64 yrs
1.0587(1.0013,1.1193] Iag1
1.0636(1.0056,1.1249] lag 2
1.0769(1.0046,1.1544] lag 0-1 avg
Multipollutant model
Respiratory admissions >64 yrs
No other pollutants: 1.0552 (1.0082,
1.1045] lag 0-1 avg
Max 1 h NO?
1.0028(0.9513,1.0572] lag 0-1 avg
Max 1 h O3
1.0534(1.0058-1.1033] lag 0-1 avg
Reference: Sinclair and Tolsma (2004,
088696)
Period of Study: 25 Months
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Outpatient Visits
Outcome: Asthma (493)
Pollutant: PM102.B-10 (/yglm3)
Averaging Time: 24 h avg
URI (460, 461, 462, 463,464,465, 466, Mean (SD): PM coarse mass ((2.5-
477)
LRI (466.1,480,481,482, 483, 484,
485, 486).
Age Groups: < - 18 y, 18 + y (asthma)
All ages (URIjjLRI)
Study Design: Times series
N: 25 months
260,000 to 275,000 health plan
members (August 1998-August 2000)
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GLM
Covariates: Season, Day of week,
Federal Holidays, Study Months
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated?: No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: Three 3 d moving
averages (0-2, 2-5, 6-8)
10 //m))—9.67 /yglm (4.74)
Monitoring Stations:
1
Copollutant (correlation): I
PM Increment: 4.74 (1 SD)
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Child Asthma:
Coarse PM - 1.053 (S)
3-5 days lag
URI:
Course PM - 1.021 (S)
3-5 days lag
LRI:
Coarse PM - 1.07 (S)
3-5 days lag
Notes: Numerical findings for significant
results only presented in manuscript.
Results for all lags presented graphically
for each outcome (asthma, URI, and LRI).
July 2009
E-347
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Sinclair and Tolsma (2004,
088696)
Period of Study: 25 Months
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Outpatient Visits
Outcome: Asthma (493)
URI (460, 461, 462, 463,464,465, 466,
477)
LRI (466.1,480,481,482, 483, 484,
485, 486).
Age Groups: < - 18 y, 18 + y (asthma)
All ages (URIjjLRI)
Study Design: Times series
N: 25 months
260,000 to 275,000 health plan
members (August 1998-August 2000)
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GLM
Covariates: Season, Day of week,
Federal Holidays, Study Months
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated?: No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: Three 3 d moving
averages (0-2, 2-5, 6-8)
Pollutant: UF (PMio-ioo nm)
Averaging Time: 24 h avg
Mean (SD): PMio-ioo nm area (/^m2/cm3)
249.33 (244.09)
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation): NR
PM Increment: NR
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Adult Asthma:
Ultrafine PM area - 1.223 (S)
3-5 days lag
URI:
Ultrafine PM: - 1.041 (S)
0-2 days lag
LRI:
Ultrafine PM area - 1.099 (S)
6-8 days lag
Notes: Numerical findings for significant
results only presented in manuscript.
Results for all lags presented graphically
for each outcome (asthma, URI, and LRI).
Reference: Slaughter et al. (2005,
073854)
Period of Study: January 1995-June
2001
Location: Spokane, WA
Hospital Admissions and ED visits
Outcome: All respiratory (460-519)
Asthma (493)
C0PD (491,492, 494,496)
Pneumonia (480-487)
Acute URI not including colds and
sinusitis (464, 466, 490)
Age Groups: All, 15 + years for C0PD
Study Design: Time series
N: 2373 visit records
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
regression, GLM with natural splines. For
comparison also used GAM with
smoothing splines and default
convergence criteria.
Covariates: Season, temperature,
relative humidity, day of week
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated?: No
Statistical Package: SAS, SPLUS
Lags Considered: 1 -3 d
Pollutant: PMi
Averaging Time: 24 h avg
Range (90% of concentrations):
3.3-17.6 //g/m3
Monitoring Stations:
One
Copollutant (correlation): PMi
PM2.6 r - 0.95
PMior - 0.50
PM10 2.5 r - 0.19
COr - 0.63
PM Increment: 10//g/m3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
ED visits:
PMi
All Respiratory
Lag 1:1.01 [0.98,1.04]
Lag 2:1.02 [0.99,1.06]
Lag 3:1.02(0.99,1.06]
Acute Asthma
Lag 1:1.03(0.97,1.09]
Lag 2: 0.99 [0.93,1.05]
Lag 3:1.02 [0.96,1.08]
C0PD (adult)
Lag 1:0.96 [0.87,1.05]
Lag 2:1.02 [0.93,1.12]
Lag 3: 0.99 [0.90,1.09]
July 2009
E-348
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Slaughter et al. (2005,
073854)
Period of Study: January 1995 through
June 2001
Location: Spokane, WA
Hospital Admissions and ED visits
Outcome: All respiratory (460-519)
Asthma (493)
C0PD (491,492, 494,496)
Pneumonia (480-487)
Acute URI not including colds and
sinusitis (464, 466, 490)
Age Groups: All, 15 + years for C0PD
Study Design: Time series
N: 2373 visit records
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
regression, GLM with natural splines. For
comparison also used GAM with
smoothing splines and default
convergence criteria.
Covariates: Season, temperature,
relative humidity, day of week
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated?: No
Statistical Package: SAS, SPLUS
Lags Considered: 1 -3 d
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h avg
Range (90% of Concentrations):
4.2-20.2/yg/m3
Monitoring Stations:
One
Notes: Copollutant (correlation): PM2.6
PMir - 0.95
PMior - 0.62
PM10 2.5 r - 0.31
COr - 0.62
Temperature r - 0.21
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
ER visits:
PM2.6
All Respiratory
Lag 1:1.01 [0.98,1.04]
Lag 2:1.02 [0.99,1.04]
Lag 3:1.02 [0.99,1.05]
Acute Asthma
Lag 1:1.03[0.98,1.09]
Lag 2:1.00 [0.95,1.05]
Lag 3:1.01 [0.96,1.06]
C0PD (adult)
Lag 1:0.96 [0.89,1.04]
Lag 2:1.01 [0.93,1.09]
Lag 3:1.00 [0.93,1.08]
Hospital Admissions:
PM2.6
All Respiratory
Lag 1:0.98 [0.94,1.01]
Lag 2: 0.99 [0.96,1.03]
Lag 3:1.01 [0.98,1.05]
Asthma
Lag 1:1.01 [0.91,1.11]
Lag 2:1.03 [0.94,1.13]
Lag 3:1.02 [0.93,1.13]
C0PD (adult)
Lag 1:0.99 [0.91,1.08]
Lag 2:1.06 [0.98,1.16]
Lag 3:1.03 [0.94,1.12]
July 2009
E-349
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Zanobetti and Schwartz
(2006,090195)
Period of Study: 1995-1999
Location: Boston, MA
Outcome: Pneumonia (480-487)
Age Groups: >65 y
Study Design: Case-crossover, time
stratified
N: 24,857 for Pneumonia
Statistical Analyses: Condition logistic
regression
Covariates: Season, long term trend, day
of-the-wk, mean temperature, relative
humidity, barometric pressure, extinction
coefficient
Season: All year
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 0-1
Notes: Also looked at Ml cohort
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Percentiles (pneumonia cohort):
25th: 7.23 //g/m3
50t h(Median): 11.10
75th: 16.14
PM Component: Black Carbon (BC), PM
non-traffic
Monitoring Stations:
4-5 monitors
Copollutant (correlation):
PM2.6:
CO
r - 0.52
NO?
r - 0.55
0s
r - 0.20
BC
r - 0.66
PM non-traffic
r - 0.74
PM Increment: PM2.6 lag 0:17.17 //g|m3
PM2.6 lag 0-1 avg: 16.32 //g/m3
% change in Pneumonia:
6.48[1.13,11.43]
lagO
5.561-0.45,11.27]
mean lag 1
Reference: Zanobetti and Schwartz
(2006,090195)
Period of Study: 1995-1999
Location: Boston, MA
Outcome: Pneumonia (480-487)
Age Groups: >65 y
Study Design: Case-crossover, time
stratified
N: 24,857 for Pneumonia
Statistical Analyses: Condition logistic
regression
Covariates: Season, long term trend, day
of-the-wk, mean temperature, relative
humidity, barometric pressure, extinction
coefficient
Season: All year
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 0-1
Notes: Also looked at Ml cohort
Pollutant: BC
Averaging Time: 24 h
Percentiles (pneumonia cohort):
5th: 0.42
25th: 0.74//gfm3
50th(Median): 1.15
75th: 1.72
95th: 2.83
PM Component: PM non-traffic
Monitoring Stations: 4-5 monitors
Copollutant (correlation):
BC:
PM2.6
r - 0.66
CO
r - 0.82
NO2
r - 0.70
0s
r - -0.25
PM non-traffic
r - -0.01
PM Increment: BC lag 0: 2.05//g|m3
BC lag 0-1 avg: 1.69 /yglm3
% change in Pneumonia:
BC-10.76(4.54,15.89]
lagO
BC-11.71[4.79,17.36]
mean lag 1
'All units expressed in//g/m3 unless otherwise specified.
July 2009
E-350
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
E.3. Short-Term Exposure and Mortality
Table E-16. Short-term exposure - mortality - PM10.
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Aga et al. (2003,187122)
Period of Study: ~ 5 yrs for most
cities, during the 1990s
Location: 28 European cities (APHEA2)
Outcome: Non-Accidental Mortality
(< 800)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM,
LOESS
Age Groups: All ages
>65
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): NR
Range (Min, Max): (15, 66)
Copollutant: BS
Note: PMio only measured in 21 cities.
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
All ages
Fixed effects: 0.71 % (0.60,0.83)
0-1
Random effects: 0.67% (0.47,0.87)
0-1
>65
Fixed effects: 0.79% (0.66,0.92)
0-1
Random effects: 0.74% (0.52,0.95)
0-1
Models with effect modifiers (> 65)
24-h NO?:
25th Percentile: 0.30% (0.07,0.53)
75th Percentile: 0.97% (0.82,1.11)
24-h temperature:
25th Percentile: 0.44% (0.25,0.64)
75th Percentile: 0.91% (0.77,1.05)
24-h relative humidity:
25th Percentile: 0.98% (0.82,1.14)
75th Percentile: 0.52% (0.33,0.71)
Age standardized annual mortality rate:
25th Percentile: 0.93% (0.77,1.09)
75th Percentile: 0.61% (0.43,0.79)
Proportion individuals >65
25th Percentile: 0.67% (0.50,0.83)
75th Percentile: 0.85% (0.71,0.99)
Northwest/Central East:
25th Percentile: 0.81% (0.63,0.98)
75th Percentile: 0.26% (-0.05,0.57)
Northwest/South:
25th Percentile: 0.81% (0.63,0.98)
75th Percentile: 1.04% (0.81,1.27)
July 2009
E-351
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Analitis et al. (2006,
088177)
Period of Study: NR
Location: 29 European cities (APHEA2)
Outcome: Mortality: Cardiovascular
diseases (390-459)
Respiratory diseases (460-519)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: 2-stage
hierarchical modeling
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Median (SD) unit: Range: 9-64//gfm3
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant: BS
Note: PMio only measured in 21 cities.
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag: Cardiovascular: Fixed effects: 0.64%
(0.47, 0.80)
0-1
Random effects: 0.76% (0.47,1.05)
0-1
0.90% (0.57,1.23)
0-5
Respiratory: Fixed effects: 0.58% (0.21,
0.95)
0-1
Random effects: 0.71 % (0.22,1.20)
0-1
1.24% (0.49,1.99)
0-5
Reference: Ballester et al. (2002,
030371)
Period of Study: 1990-1996
Location: 13 Spanish cities
Outcome: Mortality:
Non-accidental (< 800)
Cardiovascular diseases (390-459)
Respiratory diseases (460-519)
Study Design: Ecological time series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM,
LOESS
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD):Huelva: 42.5 (15)
Madrid: 37.8 (17.7)
Sevilla: 45.1 (14)
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant: BS
TSP
SO?
Note: PMio only measured in 3 cities.
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Relative Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Non-accidental:
Random effects: 1.006 (0.998,1.015)
0-1
Fixed Effects: 1.005 (1.001,1.010)
0-1
PM10+SO2:1.013 (1.006,1.020)
0-1
Cardiovascular:
1.012(1.005,1.018)
0-1
PM10+SO2:
Random effects: 1.024 (1.001,1.048)
0-1
Fixed effects: 1.021 (1.007,1.035)
0-1
Respiratory:
1.013(1.001,1.026)
0-1
PM10+SO2:1.003 (0.983,1.023)
0-1
Reference: Bateson and Schwartz
(2004, 086244)
Outcome: Mortality:
Pollutant: PMio
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Heart Disease (390-429)
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
Period of Study: 1988-1991
Respiratory (460-519)
Mean (SE) unit: 37.6 (15.5) //g|m3
lag:
Location: Cook County, Illinois
Study Design: Bi-directional case-
crossover
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Age Groups: a 65
Range (Min, Max): (3.7,128)
Copollutant: NR
All-cause: 1.14% (0.44,1.85)
0-1
Modification of Effect by Prior Diagnosis
Myocardial Infarction: 1.98% (-0.25,
July 2009
E-352
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Study population:
65,180 elderly residents with history of
hospitalization for heart or lung disease
4.26)
0-1
Diabetes: 1.49% (-0.06, 3.07)
0-1
Congestive heart failure: 1.28% (-0.06,
2.64)
0-1
C0PD: 0.58% (-0.82, 2.00)
0-1
Conduction Disorders: 0.64% (-0.61,
1.90)
0-1
All other heart or lung diseases: 0.74%
(¦0.29,1.79)
0-1
All-cause
Men
65: 2.0% (0.3, 3.8)
0-1
75: 1.5% (-0.2,3.1)
0-1
85: 0.9% (-0.7, 2.5)
0-1
95: 0.3% (-1.3,1.9)
0-1
All: 1.3% (0.4, 2.3)
0-1
Women
65: 0.1% (-1.6,1.9)
0-1
75: 0.7% (-1.1,2.4)
0-1
85: 1.2% (-0.5,3.0)
0-1
95: 1.8% (0.03,3.6)
0-1
All: 1.0% (0.1,1.9)
0-1
Total
65: 1.1% (-0.12, 2.3)
0-1
75: 1.1% (-0.1,2.3)
0-1
85: 1.2% (-0.0,2.4)
0-1
95: 1.2% (0.0, 2.4)
July 2009
E-353
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
0-1
All: 1.1% (0.4,1.9)
0-1
Reference: Bell et al. (2009,191007)
Period of Study: 1987-2000
Location: 84 US Counties
Outcome: Mortality
Study Design: Time-series
Covariates: socio-economic conditions,
long term temperature
Statistical Analysis: Bayesian
hierarchical model
Age Groups: All
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean (SD) Unit: NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Increment: 20% of the population
acquiring air conditioning
Percent Change (95% CI) in
community-specific PM health effect
estimates for mortality
Any AC, including window units
Yearly health effect: -30.4 (-80.4-19.6)
Summer health effect: 29.9 (-84-144)
Winter health effect: -573 (-9100-7955)
Central AC
Yearly health effect: -39 (-81.4-3.3)
Summer health effect: 20. (-60.3-64.3)
Winter health effect: -1 111 (-5755-2201)
Reference: Bell et al. (2007, 093256)
Period of Study: 1999-2005
Location: US
Outcome: Mortality
Age Groups: 65 +
Study Design: time series
N: NR
Statistical Analyses: Bayesian
Hierarchical Regression
Covariates: time trend, day of week,
seasonality, dew point, temperature
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 0-2
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: daily
Mean:
Ni: 0.002
Min:
Ni: 0.003
Max:
Ni: 0.021
Interquartile Range:
Ni: 0.001
Interquartile Range of Percents:
Ni: 0.01
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: Al, NhU+, As, Ca, CI, Cu,
EC, 0MC, Fe, Pb, Mg. Ni, NOs-, K, Si,
Na+, S04-, Ti, V, Zn
Co-pollutant Correlation
Ni, V: 0.48
Ni, EC: 0.30
Note: Pollutant concentrations available
for all fractions of PM2.6
PM Increment: Interquartile Range in
the fraction of PM2.6
Percent Increase in PMio Health
Effect (Lower CI, Upper CI)
Ni: 14.8 (-8.1, 37.7), lag 0
Ni: 14.7 (4.0,25.3), lag 1
Ni: 14.7 (1.8,27.5), lag 2
HS education: -31.9 (-82.4,18.6)
median income: -12.3 (-62.3, 37.7)
Percent black: 48.7 (-15.8,113)
Percent living in urban area:-20.1 (-102,
61.7)
Population: 5.1 (-14.4, 24.5)
Notes: Interquartile ranges in percent HS
education, median income, percent black,
percent living in urban area, and
population are 5.2 %, $9,223,17.3%,
11.0%, and 549,283 respectively.
July 2009
E-354
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Bellini et al. (2007, 097787) Outcome: Mortality
Period of Study: 1996-2002
Location: 15 Italian cities
All-cause (non-accidental) (< 800)
Cardiovascular (390-459)
Respiratory (460-519)
Study Design: Meta-analysis
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GLM
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant: SO2
NO?
CO
0s
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
All-cause:
0.31% (-0.19, 0.74)
0-1
Winter: 0.08%
0-1
summer: 1.95%
0-1
PMio+Os: 0.30%
0-1
PM10+NO2: 0.08%
0-1
Respiratory:
0.54% (-0.91,1.74)
0-1
Winter: 0.27%
0-1
summer: 3.61%
0-1
PMio+Os: 0.55%
0-1
PM10+NO2: 0.19%
0-1
Cardiovascular:
0.54% (0.02,1.02)
0-1
Winter: 0.20%
0-1
summer: 2.79%
0-1
PMio+Os: 0.57%
0-1
PM10+NO2: 0.39%
0-1
July 2009
E-355
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Burnett et al. (2004,
086247)
Period of Study: 1981-1999
Location: 12 Canadian cities
Outcome: Mortality:
Non-accidental (< 800)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: 1. Poisson,
natural splines
2. Random effects regression model
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): PMz.b: 12.8
PMio-2.5:11.4
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation): NO2
0s
SO?
CO
Note: PM10 measurement calculated as
the sum of PM2.6 and PMio-2.5
measurements.
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
1981-1999
PM10: 0.57% (0.05, 0.89)
1
PM10+NO2: 0.07% (-0.44,0.58)
1
July 2009
E-356
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Cakmak et al. (2007,
091170)
Period of Study: 1/1997-12/2003
Location: Chile-7 cities
Outcome: Mortality:
Non-accidental (< 800)
Cardiovascular diseases (390-459)
Respiratory diseases (460-519)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
Random effects regression model
Age Groups: All age
~ 64
65-74
75-84
>85
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): 84.9
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation): O3: r — -0.16
to 0.13
SO2: r - 0.37 to 0.77
CO: r-0.49 to 0.82
Note: Correlations are between
pollutants for seven monitoring stations.
July 2009
E-357
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Non-accidental:
0.97% (-1.09, 2.76)
0
1.31% (-1.56, 3.68)
0-5
PM10+O3+SO2+CO: 0.80% (-0.87, 2.28)
0
~ 64:
0.52% (-0.55,1.51)
0
0.49% (-0.51,1.43)
0-5
65-75:
1.07% (-1.23, 3.03)
0
1.31% (-1.57, 3.69)
0-5
75-84:
1.41% (-1.71,3.94)
0
1.93% (-2.57, 5.30)
0-5
>85:
1.56% (-1.94,4.34)
0
2.14% (-2.97, 5.85)
0-5
April-September:
1.03% (-1.17, 2.93)
0
1.37% (-1.64,3.82)
0-5
October-March:
0.07% (-0.07, 0.21)
0
0.15% (-0.15, 0.44)
0-5
Cardiovascular:
1.14% (-1.31,3.21)
0
1.49% (-1.82, 4.14)
0-5
Respiratory:
2.03% (-2.75, 5.56)
0 DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
3.11% (-5.25, 8.25)
0-5
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Chen et al. (2008,190106)
Outcome (ICD9: 2001
Pollutant: PMio
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Period of Study: 2001-2004
ICD10:2002-2004):
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
Location: Shanghai, China
Mortality:
Mean (SD): 102.0
lag:
Non-accidental causes (ICD9 < 800
Range (Min, Max): (14.0-566.8)
Non-accidental
ICD10 A00-R99)
Copollutant (correlation):
Single Pollutant: 0.26% (0.14,0.37)
Cardiovascular (ICD9 390-459
SO?
PM10+SO2: 0.08% (-0.07,0.22)
ICD10 I00-I99)
r - 0.64
PM10+NO2: 0.01% (-0.14,0.17)
Respiratory (ICD9 460-519
NO?
PM10+SO2+NO2: 0.00% (-0.16, 0.16)
ICD10 J00-J98)
r - 0.71
Cardiovascular mortality
Study Design: Time-series
Single Pollutant: 0.27% (0.10, 0.44)
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM
PM10+SO2: 0.12% (-0.10,0.34)
Age Groups: All ages
PM10+NO2: 0.01% (-0.22,0.25)
PM10+SO2+NO2: 0.01% (-0.23, 0.25)
Respiratory mortality
Single Pollutant: 0.27% (-0.01, 0.56)
PM10+SO2:-0.04% (-0.41, 0.33)
PM10+NO2: -0.05% (-0.45, 0.34)
PM10+SO2+NO2: -0.10% (-0.50, 0.30)
July 2009
E-358
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Daniels et al. (2004,
087343)
Period of Study: 1987-1994
Location: 20 Largest U.S. cities
Outcome: Mortality:
Pollutant: PM10
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Total (Non-accidental) mortality
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
Cardiovascular-Respiratory (390-448)
Mean (SD):
lag:
(480-486, 487, 490-496, 507)
Los Angeles: 46.0
Total (non-accidental):
Other-cause mortality
New York: 28.8
0.17% (0.03, 0.30)
Study Design: Time-series
Chicago: 35.6
0
Statistical Analyses: City-Specific
Dallas-Ft. Worth: 23.8
0.20% (0.07, 0.33)
Estimates: Poisson GLM, natural cubic
splines
Houston: 30.0
1
Combined Estimates: 2-stage Bayesian
San Diego: 33.6
0.28% (0.16, 0.41)
hierarchical model
Santa Ana-Anaheim: 37.4
0-1 avg
Age Groups: All ages
Phoenix: 39.7
Cardiovascular-Respiratory:
Detroit: 40.9
0.17% (-0.01,0.35)
Miami: 25.7
0
Philadelphia: 35.4
0.27% (0.09, 0.44)
Minneapolis: 26.9
1
Seattle: 25.3
0.30% (0.18, 0.51)
San Jose: 30.4
0-1 avg
Cleveland: 45.1
Other-cause:
San Bernardino: 37.0
0.17% (-0.03, 0.37)
Pittsburgh: 31.6
0
Oakland: 26.3
0.12% (-0.07, 0.31)
Atlanta: 34.4
1
San Antonio: 23.8
0.20% (0.01,0.38)
0-1 avg
Threshold Models: Total Mortality
Threshold - 15//g/m3
0.30% (0.17, 0.42)
0-1 avg
Threshold - 0 //g|m3
0.28% (0.16, 0.41)
0-1 avg
Threshold - 20 //g|m3
0.30% (0.16, 0.43)
0-1 avg
Reference: De Leon et al. (2003,
055688)
Period of Study: 111985-1211994
Location: New York, New York
Outcome: Mortality:
Circulatory (390-459)
Cancer (140-239)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM
Age Groups: All ages
<75
>75
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD):
33.27 /yglm3
IQR (25th, 75th):
(22.67, 40.83)
Copollutant (correlation): 03
CO
SO?
NO?
Increment: 18.16 //g/m3
Relative Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
All Ages
Cancer: 1.014(1.000,1.029)
0-1
¦w/out respiratory: 1.011 (0.996,1.026)
0-1
¦w/ respiratory: 1.051 (0.998,1.107)
0-1
July 2009
E-359
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI) ~
Circulatory: 1.025(1.014,1.035)
0-1
¦w/out respiratory: 1.022 (1.012,1.033)
0-1
¦w/ respiratory: 1.054(1.022,1.086)
0-1
<75
Cancer: 1.003 (0.985,1.021)
0-1
¦w/out respiratory: 1.002 (0.983,1.022)
0-1
¦w/ respiratory: 1.009(0.943,1.078)
0-1
Circulatory: 1.027 (1.012,1.043)
0-1
¦w/out respiratory: 1.027 (1.011,1.043)
0-1
¦w/ respiratory: 1.033(0.980,1.089)
0-1
>75
Cancer: 1.033 (1.009,1.058)
0-1
¦w/out respiratory: 1.025 (1.000,1.050)
0-1
¦w/ respiratory: 1.129 (1.041,1.225)
0-1
¦w/out pneumonia: 1.026 (1.002,1.050)
0-1
¦w/ pneumonia: 1.183 (1.058,1.323)
0-1
¦w/out COPD: 1.032 (1.008,1.057)
0-1
¦w/ COPD: 1.008 (0.849,1.197)
0-1
Circulatory: 1.025(1.012,1.038)
0-1
¦w/out respiratory: 1.022 (1.008,1.035)
0-1
¦w/ respiratory: 1.066 (1.027,1.106)
0-1
¦w/out pneumonia: 1.023 (1.010,1.036)
0-1
¦w/ pneumonia: 1.078 (1.018,1.141)
0-1
¦w/out COPD: 1.025 (1.012,1.038)
July 2009 E-360 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
0-1
¦w/COPD: 1.058 (0.991,1.130)
0-1
Reference: Dominici et al. (2003,
042804)
Period of Study: 1987-1994
Location: 88 U.S. cities
Outcome: Mortality:
Pollutant: PMio
Increment: 10 //g/m3
All-cause (non-accidental) (< 800)
Cardiac (390-448)
Respiratory (490-496)
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Cardio- respiratory
Influenza (487)
Copollutant (correlation): NR
0.31% (0.15, 0.50)
Pneumonia (480-486, 507)
1
Other causes
All-cause
Study Design: Time-series
0.22% (0.10, 0.38)
Statistical Analyses: 2-stage Bayesian
hierarchical model
Age Groups: < 65
65-74
1
Other causes
0.13% (-0.05, 0.29)
1
>75
Reference: Dominici et al. (2004)
Outcome: Mortality:
Pollutant: PMio
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Period of Study: 1987-1994
Total (non-accidental)
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
Location: 90 U.S. cities (NMMAPS)
Study Design: Time-series
Mean (SD): NR
lag:
Statistical Analyses: Poisson. GAM,
GLM
Age Groups: All ages
Range (Min, Max): NR
~ - 3
0.2% (0.05, 0.35)
Reference: Dominici et al. (2004,
096951)
Period of Study: 1986-1993
Location: 10 U.S. cities
Outcome: Mortality:
Pollutant: PMio
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Total (non-accidental)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: 2-stage Bayesian
hierarchical model
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD):
Birmingham 34.8
Canton 28.4
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Combined analysis:
0.26% (-0.37, 0.65)
Age Groups: All;
Colorado Springs 27.5
Minneapolis/St. Paul 28.1
Seattle 32.2
Spokane 42.9
Chicago 36.3
Detroit 36.7
New Haven 28.6
Pittsburgh 36.0
New York: 28.8
0-1
Separate analysis:
0.28% (-0.12, 0.63)
0-1
Notes: A separate analysis assumes the
mortality data does not provide any
information on the log relative rates of
mortality.
Reference: Dominici et al. (2007,
097361)
Period of Study: PMio: 1987-2000
PM2.b: 1999-2000
Location: 100 U.S. counties (NMMAPS)
Outcome: Mortality:
All-cause (non-accidental)
Cardiorespiratory
Other-cause
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: 2-stage Bayesian
hierarchical model
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
PMio
All-cause:
East:
1987-1994: 0.29% (0.12,0.46)
1
1995-2000: 0.13% (-0.19,0.44)
1
July 2009
E-361
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
1987-2000: 0.25% (0.11,0.39)
1
1
West:
1987-1994: 0.12% (-0.07,0.30)
1
1
1995-2000: 0.18% (-0.07,0.44)
1
1
1987-2000: 0.12% (-0.02,0.26)
1
I
National:
1987-1994: 0.21% (0.10, 0.32)
1
I
1995-2000: 0.18% (0.00, 0.35)
1
1
1987-2000: 0.19% (0.10, 0.28)
1
1
Cardiorespiratory:
East:
1987-1994: 0.39% (0.16, 0.63)
1
1
1995-2000: 0.30% (-0.13,0.73)
1
1
1987-2000: 0.34% (0.15, 0.54)
1
I
West:
1987-1994: 0.17% (-0.07,0.40)
1
I
1995-2000: 0.13% (-0.23,0.50)
1
1
1987-2000: 0.14% (-0.05,0.33)
1
1
National:
1987-1994: 0.28% (0.14, 0.43)
1
1
1995-2000: 0.21% (-0.03,0.44)
1
I
1987-2000: 0.24% (0.13, 0.36)
i
i
Other-cause:
East:
1987-1994: 0.21% (-0.03,0.44)
1
I
1995-2000: 0.00% (-0.49,0.50)
1
1
1987-2000: 0.15% (-0.09,0.39)
July 2009
E-362
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
1
West:
1987-1994: 0.09% (-0.21,0.38)
1
1995-2000: 0.23% (-0.15,0.62)
1
1987-2000: 0.17% (-0.07,0.41)
1
National:
1987-1994: 0.15% (-0.02,0.32)
1
1995-2000: 0.17% (-0.07,0.41)
1
1987-2000: 0.15% (0.00, 0.29)
1
Reference: Dominici et al. (2007,
099135)
Period of Study: 2000-2005
Location: 72 U.S. counties representing
69 communities
Outcome: Total mortality
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: 2-stage Bayesian
hierarchical model
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation): NR
The study does not provide results
quantitatively.
Note: The study investigated whether
county-specific short-term effects of
PMio on mortality are modified by long-
term county-specific nickel or vanadium
PM2.6 concentrations.
Reference: Fischer et al. (2003,
043739)
Period of Study: 1986-1994
Location: The Netherlands
Outcome: Mortality:
Non-accidental (< 800)
Pneumonia (480-486)
C0PD (490-496)
Cardiovascular (390-448)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM,
LOESS
Age Groups: <45
45-64
65-74
>75
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Median (SD) unit: 34
Range (Min, Max): (10, 278)
Copollutant: BS
0s
NO?
SO?
CO
Increment: 80 //gfm3
Relative Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Cardiovascular
<45:0.906(0.728,1.128)
0-6
45-64: 1.023(0.945,1.106)
0-6
65-74: 1.002(0.945,1.062)
0-6
> 75: 1.016 (0.981,1.052)
0-6
C0PD
<45:1.153(0.587,2.268)
0-6
45-64: 1.139(0.841,1.541)
0-6
65-74: 1.166(0.991,1.372)
0-6
> 75:1.066 (0.965,1.178)
0-6
Pneumonia
<45:1.427(0.806,2.525)
0-6
45-64: 1.712(1.042,2.815)
July 2009
E-363
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
0-6
65-74: 1.240 (0.879,1.748)
0-6
> 75:1.123 (1.011,1.247)
0-6
Reference: Fischer et al. (2004,
055605)
Period of Study: 6/2003-8/2003
Location: The Netherlands
Outcome: Total mortality
Study Design: NR
Statistical Analyses: NR
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: Weekly avg
Mean (SD):
2000: 31
2002: 33
2003: 35
IQR (25th, 75th): NR
Copollutant: 0:i
The study does not present quantitative
results.
Notes: The study estimates the number
of deaths attributable to PMio during the
summers of 2000, 2002, and 2003.
Reference: Forastiere et al. (2005,
086323)
Period of Study: 1998-2000
Location: Rome, Italy
Outcome: Mortality:
Pollutant: PMio
Increment: 29.7 /yglm3
Ischemic heart disease (410-414)
Study Design: Time-stratified case-
crossover
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): 52.1 (22.2)
IQR (25th, 75th):
(36.0, 65.7)
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
4.8% (0.1,9.8)
0
Age Groups: >35
Copollutant (correlation):
PNC: r - 0.38
CO: r - 0.34
NO?: r - 0.45
SO?: r - 0.23
O3: r - 0.13
4.9% (0.0,10.1)
1
3.8% (-1.0, 8.9)
2
2.8% (-2.0, 7.7)
3
6.1% (0.6,11.9)
0-1
Reference: Forastiere et al. (2007,
090720)
Period of Study: 1998-2001
Location: Rome, Italy
Outcome: Mortality:
Pollutant: PMio
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Natural (< 800)
Malignant neoplasms (140-208)
Diabetes mellitus (250)
Hypertensive disease (401-405)
Previous acute myocardial infarction
(410,412)
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean Range (SD) unit: 51.0
(21.0)/yg/m3
IQR (25th, 75th):
(36.1,63.0)
Copollutant (correlation): NR
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Non-accidental: 1.1% (0.7,1.6)
0-1
Low income: 1.9%
0-1
Low SES: 1.4%
Other ischemic heart diseases (411, 413-
414)
Conduction disorders (426)
0-1
Dysrhythmia (427)
High income: 0.0%
Heart failure (428)
0-1
Cerebrovascular disease (430-438)
High SES: 0.1%
Peripherical artery disease (440-448)
0-1
COPD (490-496)
Low PM Area: 0.9% (-0.4,2.1)
Study Design: Time-stratified case-
crossover
0-1
High PM Area: 1.47% (0.4,2.5)
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
0-1
Age Groups: >35
July 2009
E-364
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Location: 9 Italian cities
Reference: Forastiere et al. (2008,
186937)
Period of Study: 1997-2004
Outcome: Mortality:
Non-accidental (< 800)
Study Design: Time-stratified case-
crossover
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Age Groups: >35
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean Range (SD) unit:
35.1 to 71.5
Range (5th, 95th):
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Total: 0.60% (0.31,0.89)
0-1
Lowest 5th: 14.3
Highest 95th: 147.0
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Age
35-64:-0.20% (-0.77,0.37)
0-1
65-74: 0.51% (0.05, 0.98)
0-1
75-84: 0.59%(0.20, 0.97)
0-1
> 85: 0.97% (0.53,1.42)
0-1
> 65: 0.75% (0.42,1.09)
Sex
Men: 0.72% (0.37,1.07)
0-1
Women: 0.83% (0.33,1.33)
0-1
Median income (by census block)
Low (< 20th percentile): 0.80% (-0.02,
1.62)
0-1
Mid-low (20th-50th percentile): 0.68%
(0.25,1.12)
0-1
Mid-high (51 st-80th percentile): 0.85%
(0.40,1.30)
0-1
High (> 80th percentile): 0.30% (-0.25,
0.86)
0-1
Location of death
Out-of-hospital: 0.71% (0.32,1.11)
0-1
Discharged 2-28 d before death: 1.34%
(0.49, 2.20)
0-1
ln-hospital: 0.65% (0.33, 0.97)
0-1
Nursing home: -0.04% (-1.02, 0.95)
0-1
July 2009
E-365
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Goldberg et al. (2003,
035202)
Period of Study: 1984-1993
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Outcome: Mortality: Congestive Heart
Failure (428)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson, natural
splines
Age Groups: a 65
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): PMio: 32.2 (17.6)
IQR (25th, 75th): PMio: (19.7,41.1)
Copollutant (correlation):
PM2.6, TSP, Sulfate, CoH, SO2, NO?, CO,
0s
This study does not present results
quantitatively for PMio
Reference: Goldberg et al. (2003,
035202)
Period of Study: 1984-1993
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Outcome: Mortality:
Diabetes (250)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson, natural
spline
Age Groups: a 65
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD):
PMio: 32.2 (17.6)//g/m3
IQR (25th, 75th):
PMio: (19.7, 41.1)
Copollutant (correlation):
PM2.6, Sulfate, CoH, SO2, NO2, CO, 0s
This study does not present results
quantitatively for PMio
July 2009
E-366
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Kan and Chen (2003,
087372)
Outcome: Mortality:
Pollutant: PMio
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Non-accidental (< 800)
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Relative Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
Period of Study: 112000-1212001
Cardiovascular (390-459)
Mean (SD): 91.14 (51.85)
lag:
Location: Shanghai, China
COPD (490-496)
Range (Min, Max): (17.0, 385.0)
Non-accidental
Study Design: Time-series
Copollutant (correlation):
All ages: 1.003(1.001,1.005)
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM,
SO2: r - 0.71
0
LOESS
NO?: r - 0.73
<65:1.001 (0.997,1.005)
Age Groups: All ages
0
<65
65-75: 1.005(1.001,1.008)
65-75
0
>75
>75:1.003(1.001,1.006)
0
Cardiovascular
All ages: 1.003(1.000,1.006)
0
<65:1.002(0.994,1.010)
0
65-75: 1.003(0.998,1.008)
0
>75:1.003(1.000,1.006)
0
COPD
All ages: 1.005(0.999,1.011)
0
<65:1.004 (0.981,1.027)
0
65-75: 0.996(0.986,1.007)
0
>75:1.006(1.000,1.012)
0
Multipollutant models
SO2:1.001 (0.998,1.003)
0
NO?: 1.001 (0.998,1.003)
0
SO2+NO2: 1.000 (0.997,1.003)
0
July 2009
E-367
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Kan and Chen (2003,
087372)
Period of Study: 112000-1212001
Location: Shanghai, China
Outcome: Mortality:
Non-accidental (< 800)
Cardiovascular (390-459)
C0PD (490-496)
Study Design: Case-crossover
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): 91.14 (51.85)
IQR (25th, 75th): (54,114)
Copollutant (correlation):
SO2: r - 0.71
Pollutant: PM10
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Odds Ratio (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Non-accidental:
Age Groups: All ages
NO?: r - 0.73
Bidirectional referent days:
7 d: 1.000 (0.9988,1.002)
0-1 ma
7 and 14 d: 1.002 (1.000,1.004)
0-1 ma
7,14, and 21 d: 1.003 (1.001,1.005)
0-1 ma
Unidirectional referent days:
7 d: 1.015 (1.012,1.018)
0-1 ma
7 and 14 d: 1.017 (1.015,1.019)
0-1 ma
7,14, and 21 d: 1.019 (1.012,1.021)
0-1 ma
Bidirectional referent days (7,14, and 21
d):
Cardiovascular:
1.004 (1.001,1.007)
0-1 ma
C0PD:
1.006 (0.999,1.013)
0-1 ma
Non-accidental:
PM10+SO2: 0.997 (0.994,1.025)
0-1 ma
PM10+NO2: 0.997 (0.994,1.025)
0-1 ma
PM10+SO2+NO2: 0.995 (0.992,1.025)
0-1 ma
July 2009
E-368
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Kan et al. (2005, 087561) Outcome: Mortality:
Period of Study: 4/25/2003-5/31/2003 Severe acute respiratory syndrome
(SARS)
Location: Beijing, China
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson, GAM,
smoothing spline
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): 149.1 (8.1)
Range (Min, Max): (34, 246)
Copollutant:
SO?
NO?
Increment: 10/yg/m3
Relative Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
0.99 (0.96 to 1.03)
0
1.00 (0.97 to 1.04)
1
1.02 (0.98 to 1.06)
2
1.04 (0.99 to 1.09)
3
1.06 (1.00 to 1.11)
4
1.06 (1.00 to 1.12)
5
1.05 (0.98 to 1.12)
6
Reference: Kan et al. (2007, 091267)
Period of Study: 3/2004-12/2005
Location: Shanghai, China
Outcome (ICD10): Mortality:
Total (non-accidental) (A00-R99)
Cardiovascular (I00-I99)
Respiratory (J00-J98)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM,
penalized splines
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): 107.9 (2.39)/yg/m3
Range (Min, Max): (22.0, 403.0)
Copollutant (correlation):
PMio
PM2.6: r - 0.84
PM 10-2.5: r - 0.88
O3: r - 0.21
Increment: 10/yg/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
PMio
Total: 0.16% (0.02, 0.30)
0-1
Cardiovascular: 0.31% (0.10, 0.53)
0-1
Respiratory: 0.33% (-0.08, 0.75)
0-1
Reference: Kan et al. (2008,156621)
Period of Study: 1/2001-12/2004
Location: Shanghai, China
Outcome: Mortality: Total (non-
accidental) (A00-R99)
Cardiovascular (I00-I99)
Respiratory (J00-J98)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GLM,
natural splines
Age Groups: All ages;
0-4
5-44
45-64
>65
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD):
Warm season: 87.4 (1.8)
Cool season: 116.7 (2.8)
Entire period: 102.0 (1.7)
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation): SO2
NO?
03
Increment: 10/yg/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Non-accidental
Warm season: 0.21 (0.09, 0.3)
0-1
Cool season: 0.26 (0.22, 0.30)
0-1
Entire period: 0.25 (0.14, 0.37)
0-1
Female: 0.33(0.18, 0.48)
0-1
Male: 0.17(0.03, 0.32)
0-1
5-44: 0.04 (-0.52, 0.59)
0-1
45-64: 0.17 (-0.11, 0.45)
July 2009
E-369
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
0-1
> 65: 0.26(0.15, 0.38)
0-1
Cardiovascular
Warm season: 0.22 (-0.14, 0.58)
0-1
Cool season: 0.25 (0.05, 0.45)
0-1
Entire period: 0.27 (0.10, 0.44)
0-1
Respiratory
Warm season: -0.28 (-0.93, 0.38)
0-1
Cool season: 0.58 (0.25, 0.92)
0-1
Entire period: 0.27 (-0.01, 0.56)
0-1
Stratified by Educational Attainment
Nonaccidental:
Low: 0.33 (0.19, 0.47)
0-1
High: 0.18(0.01,0.36)
0-1
Cardiovascular:
Low: 0.30 (0.10, 0.51)
0-1
High: 0.23 (-0.03, 0.50)
0-1
Respiratory:
Low: 0.36 (0.00, 0.72)
0-1
High: 0.02 (-0.43, 0.47)
0-1
July 2009
E-370
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Keatinge and Donaldson
(2006, 087536)
Period of Study: 1991-2002
Location: London, England
Outcome: Mortality: Total (non-
accidental)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM
Age Groups: a 65
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant: 0:i
SO?
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Mortality per 106 (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
PMio+Temp: 2.1 (0.9, 3.3)
0-2 avg
PMio+Temp+Acclim: 1.6 (0.4, 2.8)
0-2 avg
PMio+Temp+Acclim+Acclim x T: 1.5
(0.3, 2.6)
0-2 avg
PMio+Temp+Acclim+Acclim x T+Sun:
1.4 (0.2,2.5)
0-2 avg
PMio+Temp+Acclim+Acclim x
T+Sun+Wind: 0.8 (-0.4,1.9)
0-2 avg
PMio+Temp+Acclim+Acclim x
T+Sun+Wind+Abs. Humid.: 0.8 (-0.3,
1.9)
0-2 avg
PMio+Temp+Acclim+Acclim x
T+Sun +Wind +Abs. Humid. + Rain: 0.9
(-0.3, 2.0)
0-2 avg
PMio+Temp+Abs. Humid.: 1.9 (0.7, 3.1)
0-2 avg
July 2009
E-371
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Kettunen et al. (2007,
091242)
Period of Study: 1998-2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Outcome (ICD10): Mortality:
Stroke (160-161,163-164)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM,
penalized thin-plate splines
Age Groups: a 65
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Median (SD) unit:
Cold Season: 16.3
Warm Season: 16.5
Range (Min, Max):
Cold Season: (3.1,136.7)
Warm Season: (3.3, 67.4)
Copollutant:
PM2.6
PM 10-2.6
UFP
0s
CO
NO?
Increment:
Cold Season: 13.8/yg/m3
Warm Season: 9.8/yglm3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Cold Season
¦0.56% (-3.32, 2.29)
0
¦0.93% (-3.55,1.75)
1
¦1.68% (-4.30,1.00)
2
¦1.53% (-4.14,1.14)
3
Warm Season
10.89% (0.95,21.81)
0
8.56% (-0.88,18.90)
1
2.06% (-6.76,11.71)
2
¦2.89% (-11.32,6.34)
3
Reference: Kim et al. (2003,155899)
Period of Study: 1/1995-12/1999
Location: Seoul, Korea
Outcome (ICD 10): Mortality:
Pollutant: PMic
Non-accidental (all except S01-S99, T01 - Averaging Time: 24-h avg
T98)
Mean (SD): 69.19 (10.36)
Cardiovascular (I00-I52)
IQR (25th, 75th):
Respiratory (J00-J98)
(44.82, 87.95)
Cerebrovascular (I60-I69)
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM
Age Groups: All ages
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
All cause:
2.8% (1.8,3.7)
0
2.8% (1.9,3.7)
1
1.4% (0.5,2.3)
2
3.7% (2.1,5.4)
distributed lag (6-day)
Respiratory:
8.3% (4.3,12.5)
0
6.4% (2.7,10.2)
1
6.5% (2.7,10.4)
2
13.9% (6.8,21.5)
distributed lag (6-day)
Pneumonia:
July 2009
E-372
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
11.6% (4.2,19.6)
0
9.0% (2.1,16.3)
1
7.7% (0.8,15.2)
2
17.1% (4.1, 31.7)
distributed lag (6-day)
COPD:
4.2% (-1.2,10.0)
0
3.5% (-1.5, 8.9)
1
1.4% (-3.7, 6.8)
2
12.2% (2.5, 22.9)
distributed lag (6-day)
Cardiovascular:
2.0% (-0.9, 5.0)
0
3.3% (0.6,6.2)
1
2.9% (0.1,5.8)
2
4.4% (-0.6, 9.6)
distributed lag (6-day)
Myocardial infarction: 2.6% (-2.3, 7.8)
0
5.8% (1.0,10.7)
1
5.5% (0.7,10.6)
2
4.9% (-3.4,13.9)
distributed lag (6-day)
Cerebrovascular:
3.2% (0.8,5.5)
0
3.1% (0.9,5.3)
1
2.4% (0.1,4.6)
2
6.3% (2.3,10.5)
distributed lag (6-day)
Ischemic stroke:
¦0.6% (-5.6, 4.7)
July 2009
E-373
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
0
0.6% (-4.2, 5.7)
1
¦0.1% (-4.9, 5.1)
2
10.3% (1.0, 20.4)
distributed lag (6-day)
Reference: Kimet al. (2004, 087417)
Outcome: Mortality: Non-accidental
Pollutant: PMio
Increment: 42.11 /yglm3
Period of Study: 1/1997-12/2001
Study Design: Time-series
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Relative Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
Location: Seoul, Korea
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM,
Mean (SD): 68.23 (36.36)//g/m3
lag:
LOESS
IQR (25th, 75th): (42.56, 84.67)
1.021 (1.009,1.035)
Age Groups: All ages
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Reference: Le Tertre et al. (2005,
087560)
Outcome: Mortality:
Pollutant: PMio
Increment: 1.0 /yglm3
Non-accidental (< 800)
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
P coefficient (SE)
Period of Study: NR
Study Design: Time-series
Mean (SD): NR
lag:
Location: 21 European cities (APHEA-2)
Statistical Analyses: Empirical Bayes
Range (Min, Max): NR
Athens: 0.001311 (0.0003)
Age Groups: All ages
Copollutant: NO2
Barcelona: 0.000575 (0.0002)
Basel: 0.000462 (0.0005)
Birmingham: 0.000305 (0.0003)
Budapest: -0.000248 (0.0005)
Cracow: 0.000155 (0.0004)
Erfurt: -0.000465 (0.0004)
Geneva: -0.000059 (0.0005)
Helsinki: 0.000389 (0.0004)
London: 0.000591 (0.0002)
Lyon: 0.001554 (0.0005)
Madrid: 0.000372 (0.0003)
Milan: 0.000901 (0.0002)
Paris: 0.000411 (0.0003)
Prague: 0.000097 (0.0002)
Rome: (0.001333 (0.0003)
Stockholm: 0.000479 (0.0009)
Tel Aviv: 0.000522 (0.0003)
Teplice: 0.000876 (0.0004)
Torino: 0.000938(0.0002)
Zurich: 0.000365 (0.0004)
Toulouse: NR (NR)
Overall: 0.00055 (0.000098)
July 2009
E-374
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Lee et al. (2007, 093042)
Period of Study: 112000-1212004
Location: Seoul, Korea
Outcome (ICD10): Mortality:
Non-accidental (A00-R99)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD):
w/ Asian dust days: 70.00 (47.80)
w/o Asian dust days: 65.77 (33.60)
Asian dust days only: 188.49 (142.85)
Copollutant:
CO
NO?
SO?
0s
Increment: 41.49 /yglm3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Model with Asian Dust Days
0.7% (0.2,1.3)
1-3
Model without Asian dust days
1.0% (0.2,1.8)
1-3
Reference: Lee and Shaddick (2007,
156685)
Period of Study: 1/1/1993 -
1213111997
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Detroit, Michigan
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Outcome (ICD 10): Mortality:
Non-accidental
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: 1. Bayesian,
penalized spline
2. Likelihood, penalized spline
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Relative Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Constant model
Cleveland: 1.0049
1
Detroit: 1.0046
1
Minneapolis: 1.0052
1
Pittsburgh: 1.0045
1
Reference: Martins et al. (2004,
087457)Period of Study: 1/1997-
12/1999
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Outcome (ICD 10): Mortality:
Respiratory (J00-J99)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GLM,
natural cubic splines
Age Groups: £ 60
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD):
Cerqueira Cesar: 42.5(22.9)
Santa Amaro: 49.6(32.1)
Central: 52.1(23.5)
Penha: 40.4(23.8)
Santana: 72.6(24.5)
Sao Miguel Paulista: 68.6(31.0)
Range (Min, Max): NR
The study does not present quantitative
results.
July 2009
E-375
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Nawrot et al. (2007,
098619)
Period of Study: 1/1997-12/2003
Location: Flanders, Belgium
Outcome: Mortality:
Non-accidental (< 800)
Cardiovascular (390-459)
Respiratory (460-519)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Main analysis:
Segmented regression models
Sensitivity analysis: Poisson GAM,
LOESS
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Median (SD) unit:
Winter: 43.3(0.88)
Spring: 39.5(0.88)
summer: 37.7(0.91)
Fall: 37.2(0.88)
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Increment:
Main analysis: NR
Sensitivity analysis: 10/yg/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Highest season-specific PMio quartile
versus the lowest season-specific PMio
quartile
summer: 7.8% (6.1, 9.6)
Spring: 6.3% (4.7, 7.8)
Autumn: 2.2% (0.58, 3.8)
Winter: 1.4% (0.06, 2.9)
Warm months (June, July, August): 7.9%
(6.2, 9.6)
Cold months (December, January,
February): 1.5% (0.22,3.3)
Intermediate months (March, April, May,
September, October, November): 4.2%
(2.9, 5.6)
Warmer Periods (April-September)
Non-accidental: 1.5% (1.1, 2.0)
0
Respiratory: 2.0% (0.6, 3.7)
0
Cardiovascular: 1.8% (1.1, 2.4)
0
Reference: O'Neill et al. (2004, 087429) Outcome: Mortality:
Period of Study: 1996-1998
1994-711995
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Non-accidental
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson, natural
cubic spline
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Range:
Hi-Vol: 46.3-164.0
TE0M: 48.2-107.5
Predicted: 30.2-162.4
Impactor: 58.4
Range (Min, Max):
Xalostoc
Hi-Vol: (40.0, 335.0)
TE0M: (16.5, 291.2)
Predicted: (60.6, 320.0)
Tlalnepantla
Hi-Vol: (25.0, 264.0)
TE0M: (10.4,275.9)
Predicted: (17.7,175.0)
Merced
Hi-Vol: (17.0, 266.0)
TE0M: (9.4, 318.7)
Predicted: (12.3,160.8)
Cerro de la Estrella
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
TE0M
0.04% (-0.12, 0.20)
0
¦0.02% (-0.18, 0.13)
1
¦0.01% (-0.27, 0.25)
2
¦0.03% (-0.19, 0.13)
3
¦0.03% (-0.19, 0.13)
4
¦0.05% (-0.21,0.11)
5
0.05% (-0.25, 0.35)
0-5
Predicted
¦0.05% (-0.29, 0.19)
0
July 2009
E-376
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Hi-Vol: (15.0, 292.0)
TEOM: (13.7, 268.3)
0.09% (-0.16, 0.34)
Pedregal (1996-1998)
Hi-Vol: (5.0, 226.0)
TEOM: (7.8, 264.4)
Predicted: (-0.5, 86.3)
Pedregal (1994-1995)
Hi-Vol: (24.0,114.0)
TEOM: (8.7,152.5)
Impactor: (15.0,154.0)
Predicted: (3.9, 75.9)
Predicted: (11.2,154.4)
¦0.12% (-0.43, 0.20)
2
¦0.02% (-0.26, 0.21)
3
¦0.14% (-0.37, 0.09)
4
¦0.05% (-0.28, 0.18)
5
0.00% (-0.39, 0.38)
0-5
Sierra-Anderson High Volume Air Sampler
0.02% (-0.29, 0.32)
0
0.13% (-0.27, 0.54)
1
0.21% (-0.10, 0.52)
2
0.53% (0.07, 0.99)
3
0.11% (-0.20, 0.41)
4
0.38% (0.07, 0.70)
5
GAM: 2 LOESS terms, default
convergence
1.68% (0.45, 2.93)
0
¦0.36% (-1.56, 0.86)
1
¦0.21% (-1.40,1.00)
2
¦0.18% (-1.40,1.05)
3
1.31% (0.08, 2.55)
4
1.49% (0.25, 2.73)
5
1.77% (-0.26, 3.83)
0-5
Parametric: cubic splines
5 df
1.45% (0.09, 2.83)
0
July 2009
E-377
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: O'Neill et al. (2005, 098094)
Period of Study: 1996-1998
1996-1999
Outcome: Mortality: Non-accidental
Cardiovascular (390-460)
Respiratory (460-520)
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): Mexico City: 75.8 (31.4)
¦0.71% (-2.06, 0.67)
1
¦0.59% (-1.95, 0.79)
2
¦0.70% (-2.09, 0.71)
3
0.92% (-0.46, 2.32)
4
1.17% (-0.19, 2.55)
5
1.17% (-1.54,3.95)
0-5
10 df
1.60% (0.20, 3.02)
0
¦0.80% (-2.18, 0.60)
1
¦0.73% (-2.11,0.68)
2
¦1.05% (-2.49, 0.40)
3
0.64% (-0.79, 2.10)
4
1.05% (-0.36, 2.48)
5
0.51% (-2.60, 3.71)
0-5
2 df
1.79% (0.48, 3.11)
0
¦0.09% (-1.38,1.22)
1
0.10% (-1.18,1.40)
2
0.20% (-1.10,1.52)
3
1.60% (0.30, 2.91)
4
1.72% (0.43, 3.04)
5
1.90% (-0.36, 4.21)
0-5
The study focuses on the temperature-
mortality relationship and only includes
PMio as a covariate in models.
July 2009
E-378
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Location: Mexico City and Monterrey,
Other-causes
Monterrey: 50.0 (23.5)
Mexico
Study Design: Time-series
Range (Min, Max): Mexico City: (18.0,
233.9)
Statistical Analyses: Poisson, natural
cubic splines
Monterrey: (6.2, 230.8)
Age Groups: All ages, 0-15, £ 65
Copollutant: 0:i
Reference: O'Neill et al. (2008,192314)
Outcome:
Pollutant: PMio
Increment: 10/yg/m3
Period of Study: 1/1/1998 ¦
Study Design: Time-series
Averaging Time: 24h
Percent increase (95% CI) in all-cause
12/30/2002
adult mortality (> 22yrs) by
Covariates: Temperature, Day of Week,
Mean (SD) /vg/m3:
educational level and sex
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Temporal trends, Sex
Mexico City: 53.8 (24.9)
Mexico City
Santiago, Chile
Statistical Analysis: Poisson regression
Sao Paulo: 48.9 (21.9)
All Adults, Concurrent Day
Sao Paulo, Brazil
Statistical Package: S-Plus
Santiago: 78.7 (33.0)
None: 0.76 (0.17-1.36)
Age Groups: Adults over 21
Range (Min, Max):
Primary: 0.27 (-0.19-0.72)
Mexico City: 1.08-192.2
Secondary: 0.19 (-0.19-0.57)
Sao Paulo: 12.0-171.3
> 12 yrs: 0.83 (0.03-1.63)
Santiago: 8.0-218.6
All Adults, Lag 1
Copollutant: NR
None: 0.62 (0.02-1.22)
Primary: 0.62 (0.17-1.08)
Secondary: 0.29 (-0.09-0.90)
a 12 yrs: 0.58 (-0.21-1.38)
All Adults, Distributed Lags 0-5
None: 0.91 (-0.07-1.89)
Primary: 0.48 (-0.27-1.24)
Secondary: 0.27 (-0.36-0.90)
>12 yrs: 0.75 (-0.49-2.02)
All Adults, df(yrs)
None: 5.4
Primary: 6.0
Secondary: 6.0
a 12 yrs: 3.0
Women, Concurrent Day
None: 0.65 (-0.08-1.38)
Primary: 0.48 (-0.13-1.09)
Secondary: 0.35 (-0.16-0.86)
> 12 yrs: 1.64 (0.69-2.59)
Women, Lag 1
None: 0.62 (-0.12-1.36)
Primary: 1.03 (0.42-1.64)
Secondary: 0.59 (0.08-1.11)
>12 yrs: 1.79 (0.84-2.75)
Women, Distributed Lags 0-5
None: 0.46 (-0.74-1.68)
Primary: 1.39 (0.42-2.36)
Secondary: 0.51 (-0.30-1.33)
> 12 yrs: 1.71 (0.61-2.83)
Women, df (yrs)
July 2009
E-379
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
None: 5.4
Primary: 4.4
Secondary: 4.8
a 12 yrs: 1.0
Men, Concurrent Day
None: 0.75 (-0.21-1.72)
Primary: 0.52 (-0.11-1.15)
Secondary: 0.56 (0.08-1.05)
> 12 yrs: 1.20 (0.25-2.17)
Men, Lag 1
None: 0.45 (-0.51-1.42)
Primary: 0.70 (0.06-1.34)
Secondary: 0.47 (-0.02-0.95)
> 12 yrs: 0.74 (-0.22-1.70)
Men, Distributed Lags 0-5
None: 1.24 (-0.25-2.75)
Primary: 0.65 (-0.39-1.69)
Secondary: 0.88 (0.11-1.66)
> 12 yrs: 1.07 (-0.41-2.57)
Men, rf/(yrs)
None: 3.8
Primary: 5.6
Secondary: 4.6
> 12 yrs: 3.8
Sao Paulo
All Adults, Concurrent Day
None: 0.77 (-0.28-1.82)
Primary: 1.27 (0.78-1.76)
Secondary: 0.93 (-0.07-1.94)
>12 yrs: 2.93 (2.00-2.88)
All Adults, Lag 1
None: 0.70 (-0.34-1.76)
Primary: 1.32 (0.83-1.82)
Secondary: 1.91 (0.58-2.60)
a 12 yrs: 2.20 (1.27-3.15)
All Adults, Distributed Lags 0-5
None: 0.76 (-0.91-2.46)
Primary: 1.34 (0.55-2.14)
Secondary: 1.91 (0.35-2.60)
a 12 yrs: 2.20 (1.27-3.15)
All Adults, df(yrs)
None: 4.0
Primary: 4.0
Secondary: 2.8
a 12 yrs: 1.6
July 2009
E-380
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Women, Concurrent Day
None: 1.93 (0.87-3.00)
Primary: 1.72 (1.04-2.41)
Secondary: 0.85 (-0.21-1.92)
> 12 yrs: 1.84 (0.56-3.13)
Women, Lag 1
None: 1.41 (0.34-2.48)
Primary: 1.64 (0.96-2.33)
Secondary: 1.43 (0.36-2.50)
> 12 yrs: 2.27 (0.99-3.56)
Women, Distributed Lags 0-5
None: 2.00 (0.40-3.63)
Primary: 2.05 (0.96-3.14)
Secondary: 1.61 (0.07-3.17)
>12 yrs: 3.35 (1.49-5.25)
Women, df (yrs)
None: 2.4
Primary: 3.6
Secondary: 1.4
> 12 yrs: 0.8
Men, Concurrent Day
None:-0.43 (-2.15-1.32)
Primary: 1.36 (0.71-2.02)
Secondary: 1.74 (0.77-2.72)
> 12 yrs: 2.81 (1.71-3.92)
Men, Lag 1
None:-0.44 (-2.17-1.33)
Primary: 1.44 (0.79-2.10)
Secondary: 1.52 (0.55-2.49)
>12 yrs: 1.48 (0.38-2.59)
Men, Distributed Lags 0-5
None: -0.30 (-3.09-2.56)
Primary: 1.67 (0.65-2.70)
Secondary: 1.06 (-0.34-2.49)
a 12 yrs: 3.18(1.60-4.79)
Men, rf/(yrs)
None: 4.4
Primary: 3.2
Secondary: 0.8
> 12 yrs: 1.2
Santiago
All Adults, Concurrent Day
None: 1.44(0.53-2.36)
Primary: 0.06 (-0.21-0.34)
Secondary: 0.42 (0.06-0.78)
July 2009
E-381
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
> 12 yrs: 1.32 (0.60-2.05)
All Adults, Lag 1
None: 2.08 (1.16-30.1)
Primary: 0.53 (0.25-0.81)
Secondary: 0.55 (0.19-0.91)
> 12 yrs: 1.31 (0.59-2.04)
All Adults, Distributed Lags 0-5
None: 3.18(1.60-4.78)
Primary: 0.58 (0.10-1.06)
Secondary: 1.10(0.48-1.73)
>12 yrs: 2.00 (0.93-3.07)
All Adults, df(yrs)
None: 3.6
Primary: 5.6
Secondary: 4.0
a 12 yrs: 1.6
Women, Concurrent Day
None: 0.91 (-0.06-1.89)
Primary: 0.31 (-0.06-0.68)
Secondary: 0.84 (0.33-1.36)
a 12 yrs: 0.60 (-0.32-1.52)
Women, Lag 1
None: 1.58 (0.58-2.58)
Primary: 0.79 (0.42-1.17)
Secondary: 0.76 (0.25-1.28)
a 12 yrs: 0.53 (-0.39-1.45)
Women, Distributed Lags 0-5
None: 1.15 (-0.48-2.80)
Primary: 1.05 (0.41-1.69)
Secondary: 1.29(0.40-2.19)
> 12 yrs: 1.06 (-0.27-2.41)
Women, df (yrs)
None: 2.6
Primary: 4.8
Secondary: 4.4
a 12 yrs: 1.0
Men, Concurrent Day
None: 0.05 (-1.02-1.12)
Primary: -0.11 (-0.5-0.28)
Secondary: 0.18 (-0.31-0.68)
> 12 yrs: 1.52 (0.70-2.35)
Men, Lag 1
None: 0.61 (-0.44-1.68)
Primary: 0.23 (-0.16-0.62)
Secondary: 0.49 (0.00-0.98)
July 2009
E-382
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
> 12 yrs: 1.03 (0.21-1.86)
Men, Distributed Lags 0-5
None: 2.08 (0.28-3.91)
Primary: 0.16 (-0.50-0.82)
Secondary: 1.27 (0.43-2.12)
>12 yrs: 1.98 (0.76-3.20)
Men, rf/(yrs)
None: 2.8
Primary: 4.8
Secondary: 4.4
a 12 yrs: 1.6
Percent increase (95% CI) in all-cause
adult mortality (>65yrs) by
educational level and sex
Mexico City
All Adults, Concurrent Day
None: 0.41 (-0.25-1.08)
Primary: 0.40 (-0.15-0.95)
Secondary: 0.50 (-0.01-1.01)
> 12 yrs: 1.51 (0.39-2.63)
All Adults, Lag 1
None: 0.20 (-0.47-0.87)
Primary: 0.80 (0.24-1.36)
Secondary: 0.60(0.09-1.12)
>12 yrs: 1.09 (-0.02-2.22)
All Adults, Distributed Lags 0-5
None: 0.27 (-0.83-1.38)
Primary: 0.99 (0.07-1.91)
Secondary: 0.30 (-0.56-1.16)
>12 yrs: 1.83 (0.09-3.59)
All Adults, df(yrs)
None: 5.6
Primary: 5.4
Secondary: 6.0
> 12 yrs: 3.2
Women, Concurrent Day
None: 0.49 (-0.30-1.29)
Primary: 0.39 (-0.33-1.11)
Secondary: 0.52 (-0.16-1.20)
> 12 yrs: 1.29 (0.12-2.48)
Women, Lag 1
None: 0.73 (-0.07-1.54)
Primary: 1.24 (0.52-1.97)
Secondary: 0.55 (-0.13-1.23)
>12 yrs: 1.50 (0.32-2.70)
Women, Distributed Lags 0-5
July 2009
E-383
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
None: 0.75 (-0.56-2.08)
Primary: 1.43 (0.29-2.59)
Secondary: 0.06 (-1.01-1.15)
> 12 yrs: 1.48 (0.10-2.87)
Women, rf/(yrs)
None: 5.4
Primary: 4.2
Secondary: 4.8
a 12 yrs: 0.6
Men, Concurrent Day
None: 0.90 (-0.23-2.04)
Primary: 0.37 (-0.40-1.16)
Secondary: 0.78 (0.07-1.49)
>12 yrs: 1.66 (0.30-3.04)
Men, Lag 1
None:-0.15 (-1.27-0.98)
Primary: 0.26 (-0.53-1.05)
Secondary: 0.93 (0.22-1.65)
>12 yrs: 0.95 (-0.41-2.32)
Men, Distributed Lags 0-5
None: 0.80 (-0.95-2.58)
Primary: 0.29 (-0.99-1.58)
Secondary: 1.06 (-0.08-2.21)
> 12 yrs: 1.76 (-0.35-3.91)
Men, rf/(yrs)
None: 3.8
Primary: 5.6
Secondary: 4.6
> 12 yrs: 3.8
Sao Paulo
All Adults, Concurrent Day
None: 0.60 (-0.48-1.70)
Primary: 0.59 (1.00-2.19)
Secondary: 1.21 (-0.01-2.44)
>12 yrs: 2.80 (1.67-3.94)
All Adults, Lag 1
None: 0.62 (-0.47-1.72)
Primary: 1.48 (0.89-2.07)
Secondary: 2.31 (1.08-3.55)
>12 yrs: 2.52 (1.40-3.66)
All Adults, Distributed Lags 0-5
None: 0.91 (-0.84-2.69)
Primary: 1.73 (0.79-2.67)
Secondary: 3.25 (1.39-5.16)
>12 yrs: 3.63 (2.01-5.29)
July 2009
E-384
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
All Adults, rf/(yrs)
None: 4.0
Primary: 3.8
Secondary: 2.6
a 12 yrs: 1.6
Women, Concurrent Day
None: 1.82 (0.71-2.94)
Primary: 1.84 (1.05-2.64)
Secondary: 0.62 (-0.55-1.81)
>12 yrs: 1.00 (-0.27-2.29)
Women, Lag 1
None: 1.36 (0.25-2.49)
Primary: 1.76 (0.97-2.56)
Secondary: 1.57 (0.39-2.76)
> 12 yrs: 1.39 (0.12-2.68)
Women, Distributed Lags 0-5
None: 1.80 (0.12-3.51)
Primary: 1.97 (0.73-3.22)
Secondary: 1.89(0.19-3.61)
>12 yrs: 2.53 (0.70-4.40)
Women, df (yrs)
None: 2.4
Primary: 3.4
Secondary: 1.2
> 12 yrs: 0.8
Men, Concurrent Day
None:-0.67 (-2.50-1.19)
Primary: 1.82 (1.00-2.65)
Secondary: 2.46 (1.31-3.63)
>12 yrs: 1.73 (0.47-3.00)
Men, Lag 1
None: -0.59 (-2.42-1.26)
Primary: 1.59 (0.78-2.41)
Secondary: 2.64(1.49-3.80)
>12 yrs: 0.89 (-0.35-2.15)
Men, Distributed Lags 0-5
None: 1.50 (-1.52-4.60)
Primary: 2.46 (1.20-3.74)
Secondary: 2.24 (0.56-3.95)
>12 yrs: 1.45 (-0.34-3.29)
Men, rf/(yrs)
None: 4.6
Primary: 3.0
Secondary: 0.8
a 12 yrs: 1.0
July 2009
E-385
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Santiago
All Adults, Concurrent Day
None: 1.49 (0.54-2.45)
Primary: 0.28 (-0.03-0.59)
Secondary: 0.58 (0.13-1.04)
> 12 yrs: 2.32 (1.50-3.15)
All Adults, Lag 1
None: 2.20 (1.24-3.17)
Primary: 0.74 (0.43-1.05)
Secondary: 0.64 (0.20-1.11)
>12 yrs: 2.20 (1.36-3.04)
All Adults, Distributed Lags 0-5
None: 3.21 (1.54-4.90)
Primary: 0.92 (0.38-1.46)
Secondary: 1.46 (0.67-2.25)
>12 yrs: 4.02 (2.78-5.27)
All Adults, df(yrs)
None: 3.8
Primary: 5.2
Secondary: 4.0
> 12 yrs: 1.8
Women, Concurrent Day
None: 1.39 (0.41-2.39)
Primary: 0.4 (0.01-0.8)
Secondary: 0.91 (0.29-1.53)
> 12 yrs: 0.87 (-0.02-1.78)
Women, Lag 1
None: 1.83 (0.83-2.85)
Primary: 0.98 (0.58-1.38)
Secondary: 0.73 (0.11-1.35)
a 12 yrs: 0.76 (-0.15-1.68)
Women, Distributed Lags 0-5
None: 2.47 (0.85-4.11)
Primary: 1.2(0.52-1.88)
Secondary: 1.71 (0.65-2.78)
> 12 yrs: 0.87 (-0.02-1.78)
Women, df (yrs)
None: 2.4
Primary: 4.8
Secondary: 4.4
a 12 yrs: 0.6
Men, Concurrent Day
None: 0.54 (-0.51-1.61)
Primary: 0.34 (-0.12-0.80)
Secondary: 0.25 (-0.40-0.91)
July 2009
E-386
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
> 12 yrs: 1.97 (1.09-2.86)
Men, Lag 1
None: 0.84 (-0.21-1.91)
Primary: 0.43 (-0.03-0.89)
Secondary: 0.61 (-0.04-1.26)
> 12 yrs: 1.57 (0.67-2.46)
Men, Distributed Lags 0-5
None: 2.41 (0.64-4.22)
Primary: 0.80 (0.02-1.59)
Secondary: 1.58 (0.45-2.71)
>12 yrs: 2.99 (1.66-4.33)
Men, rf/ (yrs)
None: 2.0
Primary: 4.4
Secondary: 4.4
> 12 yrs: 1.8
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Winter:
¦0.4% (-0.30, 0.21)
0
0.15% (-0.08, 0.39)
1
0.10% (-0.13, 0.33)
2
Spring:
0.32% (0.08, 0.56)
0
0.14% (-0.14,0.42)
1
0.05% (-0.21,0.32)
2
Summer:
0.13% (-0.11,0.37)
0
0.36% (0.11,0.61)
1
¦0.03% (-0.27, 0.21)
2
Fall:
0.05% (-0.16, 0.25)
0
0.14% (-0.06, 0.34)
1
Reference: Peng et al. (2005, 087463)
Period of Study: 1987-2000
Location: 100 U.S. cities (NMMAPS)
Outcome: Mortality:
Non-accidental
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Bayesian
semiparametric hierarchical models
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Median (SD) unit: 27.1
Range (Min, Max): (13.2, 48.7)
Copollutant (correlation): NR
July 2009
E-387
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
0.13% (-0.08, 0.35)
2
All Seasons:
0.09% (-0.01,0.19)
0
0.19% (0.10, 0.28)
1
0.08% (-0.03, 0.19)
2
PMio only (45 cities):
Winter: 0.15% (-0.16, 0.45)
Spring: 0.13% (-0.21, 0.48)
Summer: 0.30% (-0.10, 0.69)
Fall: 0.07% (-0.23, 0.37)
PMio + O3 (45 cities):
Winter: 0.18% (-0.16, 0.52)
Spring: 0.10% (-0.30, 0.49)
Summer: 0.33% (-0.14, 0.81)
Fall: 0.08% (-0.25, 0.41)
PMio + O3 (45 cities):
Winter: 0.13% (-0.24, 0.49)
Spring: 0.1% 9( 0.18, 0.56)
Summer: 0.28% (-0.13, 0.70)
Fall:-0.01% (-0.34, 0.31)
PMio + NO2 (45 cities):
Winter: 0.21% (-0.18, 0.60)
Spring: 0.19% (-0.17, 0.54)
Summer: 0.34% (0.01, 0.68)
Fall: 0.13% (-0.12, 0.39)
July 2009
E-388
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Penttinen et al. (2004,
087432)
Period of Study: 1988-1996
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Outcome: Mortality:
Pollutant: PMio
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Total (non-accidental) (< 800)
Cardiovascular (390-459)
Respiratory (460-519)
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Median (SD) unit: 21 //gfm3
Range (Min, Max): (0.2, 213)
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Total (non-accidental)
Study Design: Time-series
Copollutant (correlation):
¦0.23% (-1.47,1.01)
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM,
LOESS
Age Groups: 15-64
65-74
>75
O3: r - -0.09
NO?: r - 0.50
CO: r - 0.45
SO2: r - 0.61
TSP: r - 0.72
0
0.88% (-0.32, 2.08)
1
0.11 (-0.51,0.73)
0-3 avg
Cardiovascular
¦1.22% (-3.00, 0.56)
0
0.63% (-1.09, 2.35)
1
I
0.08% (-0.96, 0.81)
0-3 avg
Respiratory
3.94% (0.01,7.87)
0
3.96% (0.11,7.81)
1
1
2.13% (0.03, 4.22)
0-3 avg
July 2009
E-389
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Qian et al. (2007, 093054)
Period of Study: 2001-2004
Location: Wuhan, China
Outcome: Mortality:
Total (non-accidental) (< 800)
Cardiovascular (390-459)
Stroke (430-438)
Cardiac Diseases (390-398)
Respiratory (460-519)
Cardiopulmonary
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM,
natural splines
Age Groups: All ages
<45
>45
<65
> 65
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): 141.8 3
Range (Min, Max): (24.8, 477.8)
Copollutant (correlation):
NO?
SO?
0s
July 2009
E-390
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Non-accidental
0.36% (0.19, 0.53)
0
0.28% (0.12, 0.45)
1
0.43% (0.24, 0.62)
0-1
0.08% (-0.15, 0.31)
0-4
<45
0.28% (-0.26, 0.82)
0
0.45% (-0.06, 0.96)
1
0.53% (-0.08,1.13)
0-1
0.41% (-0.31,1.13)
0-4
>45
0.36% (0.19, 0.54)
0
0.27% (0.10, 0.44)
1
0.42% (0.22, 0.62)
0-1
0.05% (-0.18, 0.29)
0-4
<65
0.20% (-0.08, 0.49)
0
0.25% (-0.03, 0.52)
1
0.33% (0.01,0.66)
0-1
0.01% (-0.38, 0.39)
0-4
>65
0.41% (0.21,0.61)
0
0.30% (0.10, 0.49)
1
0.46% (0.24, 0.69)
0-1
0.10% (-0.16, 0.37)
° tRAFT- DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
Cardiovascular
0.51% (0.28, 0.75)
0
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Qian et al. (2008,156894)
Period of Study: 712001-612004
Location: Wuhan, China
Outcome: Mortality:
Total (non-accidental) (< 800)
Cardiovascular (390-459)
Stroke (430-438)
Cardiac diseases (390-398, 410-429)
Respiratory (460-519)
Cardiopulmonary (390-459,460-519)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GLM,
natural splines and penalized splines
Age Groups: All ages
<65
> 65
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD):
Normal temperature: 145.7 (64.6)
Low temperature: 117.3 (49.5)
High temperature: 96.3 (27.9)
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation):
Normal temperature:
NO?: r - 0172
SO?: r - 0.59
O3: r - 0.06
Low temperature:
NO?: r - 0.83
SO2: r - 0.74
O3: r - 0.19
High temperature:
NO?: r - 0.68
SO2: r - 0.15
O3: r - 0.65
July 2009
E-391
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Non-accidental:
Normal:
All ages: 0.36 (0.17,0.56)
0-1
<65:0.23(-0.10, 0.56)
0-1
> 65: 0.51 (0.18, 0.64)
0-1
PM10+NO2: 0.07 (-0.17, 0.30)
0-1
PM10+SO2: 0.27 (0.06, 0.47)
0-1
PMio+Os: 0.38 (0.18, 0.58)
0-1
Low:
All ages: 0.62 (-0.09,1.34)
0-1
<65:1.78(0.52, 3.05)
0-1
> 65: 0.22 (-0.61,1.05)
0-1
PM10+NO2: 0.24 (-0.49, 0.97)
0-1
PM10+SO2: 0.45 (-0.27,1.17)
0-1
PMio+Os: 0.72 (0.00,1.44)
0-1
High:
All ages: 2.20 (0.74, 3.68)
0-1
<65:2.34(-0.09, 4.83)
0-1
> 65: 2.14(0.42, 3.89)
0-1
PM10+NO2: 1.87 (0.42, 3.35)
0-1
PM10+SO2: 2.12 (0.67, 3.60)
0-1
PMio+Os: 2.15 (0.55, 3.77)
0-1
Cardiovascular:
Normal:
All ages: 0.39 (0.11,0.66)
0-1
OR QUOTE
0-1
> 65: 0.44 (0.14,0.74)
0-1
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ren et al. (2006, 092824)
Outcome: Mortality:
Pollutant: PMio
The study presents quantitative results
associated with an incremental increase
Period of Study: 111996-1212001
Non-accidental
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
in temperature, not PMio.
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Cardiovascular (390-448)
Mean (SD): 15.84
Study Design: Time-series
Range (Min, Max): (2.5, 60)
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM,
Copollutant: 0:i
cubic spline
Age Groups: All ages
July 2009
E-392
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Roberts (2004, 087924)
Period of Study: 1987-1994
Location: Cook County, Illinois
Allegheny County, Pennsylvania
Outcome: Mortality:
Pollutant: PMio
Non-accidental (< 800)
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Study Design: Time-series
Median (SD) unit:
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM,
Cook County
smooth splines
Lower Temp.: 29.24
Poisson GLM, natural cubic splines
Middle Temp.: 30.03
Age Groups: a 65
UpperTemp.: 52.76
Allegheny County
Lower Temp.: 16.50
Middle Temp.: 24.97
UpperTemp.: 55.42
Range (10th, 90th):
Cook County
Lower Tem.: (16.42, 46.42)
Middle Temp.: (14.79, 56.33)
UpperTemp.: (30.81, 82.81)
Allegheny County
Lower Temp.: (5.14, 34.54)
Middle Temp.: (8.91,57.91)
UpperTemp.: (30.91, 88.99)
July 2009
E-393
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Increase (SE)
lag:
GLM
Cook
~ - 0.5
No Interaction: 0.288% (0.157)
0
Low Temp.:-0.272% (0.380)
0
Middle Temp.: 0.344% (0.165)
0
Upper Temp.: 0.281% (0.239)
0
No Interaction: 0.359% (0.149)
1
Low Temp.:-0.168% (0.372)
1
Middle Temp.: 0.361% (0.156)
1
UpperTemp.: 0.616% (0.250)
1
No Interaction: 0.465% (0.176)
0-1 ma
Low Temp.: 0.043% (0.397)
0-1 ma
Middle Temp.: 0.506% (0.184)
0-1 ma
UpperTemp.: 0.464% (0.256)
0-1 ma
No Interaction: 0.633% (0.214)
0-3 ma
Low Temp.: 0.365% (0.419)
0-3 ma
Middle Temp.: 0.638% (0.222)
0-3 ma
UpperTemp.: 0.718% (0.295)
0-3 ma
~ - 1
No Interaction: 0.117% (0.157)
0
Low Temp.: -0.351% (0.406)
0
Middle Temp.: 0.161% (0.165)
0
UpperTemp.: 0.096% (0.264)
0
No^^tjo^g.J^f.^l^R QU0TE
1
Low Temp.: -0.366% (0.397)
1
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Roberts (2004, 087924)
Period of Study: 1987-1994
Location: Cook County, Illinois
Allegheny County, Pennsylvania
Outcome: Mortality:
Non-accidental
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GLM
Age Groups: a 65
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): NR
Range (Min, Max):
Max - 89
The study does not present quantitative
results.
Reference: Roberts ((2005, 087992)
Period of Study: Cook County: 1987-
2000. Allegheny County: 1987-1998
Location: Cook County, Illinois
Allegheny County, Pennsylvania
Outcome: Mortality:
Non-accidental
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
Age Groups: a 65
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Increment: NR
PISE)
lag:
Standard Model
Cook County
0.000127 (0.000264)
0
¦0.000042 (0.000249)
1
¦0.000441 (0.000246)
2
Allegheny County
0.000693 (0.000437)
0
0.000356 (0.000423)
1
0.000524 (0.000415)
2
Moving Total Model
Cook County
0.000150 (0.000187)
k - 2
¦0.000047 (0.000153)
k - 3
0.000009 (0.000133)
k - 4
Allegheny County
0.000633 (0.000310)
k - 2
0.000542 (0.000255)
k - 3
0.000598 (0.000351)
k - 4
July 2009
E-394
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Roberts (2006, 089762)
Period of Study: 1987-2000
Location: Cook County, Illinois
Suffolk County, Massachusetts
(NMMAPS)
Outcome: Mortality:
Non-accidental
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GLM
Age Groups: a 65
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): Cook County: 33.7 (19.4)
Suffolk County: 25.9 (11.8)
Range (10th, 90th):
Cook County: (13.4, 58.1)
Suffolk County: (14.0, 41.7)
Copollutant (correlation):
Cook County
CO: r - 0.30
NO?: r - 0.53
SO?: r - 0.45
O3: r - 0.44
Suffolk County
CO: r - 0.33
NO?: r - 0.43
SO2: r - 0.23
O3: r = 0.36
Increment:
Cook County: 19.4/yg/m3
Suffolk County: 14.0/yg/m3
% Increase (SD)
lag:
Cook County
Standard Model: 0.49% (0.25)
0
Proposed Model: 0.29% (0.16)
0
Standard Model: 0.67% (0.25)
0-2 avg
Proposed Model: 0.49% (0.25)
0-2 avg
Suffolk County
Standard Model: 0.88% (1.27)
0
Proposed Model: 0.85% (0.84)
0
Standard Model: 1.60% (0.71)
0-2 avg
Proposed Model: 1.35% (0.73)
0-2 avg
Reference: Roberts and Martin (2006,
097799)
Period of Study: 1987-2000
Location: Cook County, Illinois
(NMMAPS)
Outcome: Mortality: Non-accidental
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Dose-response
1. Piecewise linear relationship (no-
threshold) with change point at 25 //gfm3
and 50 //g|m3
2. Piecewise linear relationship
(threshold), exposure below 25 /yglm3 no
effect, and exposures above 50 /yglm3
having a different effect then exposures
between 25 /yglm3 and 50 /yglm3
Age Groups: a 65
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): NR
IQR (25th, 75th):
(23.9, 45.4)
Suffolk County: (14.0, 41.7)
Copollutant (correlation): NR
The study does not present quantitative
results.
Reference: Roberts and Martin (2006,
088670)
Period of Study: 1987-2000
Location: 109 U.S. cities (NMMAPS)
Outcome: Mortality: Non-accidental
Pollutant: PM10
Increment: NR
Cardiorespiratory
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): NR
IQR (25th, 75th): NR
P x 1000 (SE x 1000)
lag:
Non-accidental
2-stage Bayesian hierarchical model
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Model 1
Age Groups: All ages
Base df: 0.079 (0.050)
0
Double df: 0.044 (0.046)
0
Half df: 0.107 (0.052)
0
July 2009
E-395
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Base df: 0.180 (0.044)
1
Double df: 0.149 (0.047)
1
Half df: 0.254 (0.048)
1
Base df: 0.059 (0.056)
2
Double df: 0.024 (0.056)
2
Half df: 0.143 (0.054)
2
Model 2
Base df: 0.115 (0.037)
0-2 ma
Double df: 0.107 (0.034)
0-2 ma
Half df: 0.145 (0.039)
0-2 ma
Cardio- respiratory
Model 1
Base df: 0.103 (0.068)
0
Double df: 0.056 (0.067)
0
Half df: 0.134 (0.066)
0
Base df: 0.232 (0.060)
1
Double df: 0.179(0.067)
1
Half df: 0.309 (0.059)
1
Base df: 0.210(0.078)
2
Double df: 0.144(0.075)
2
Half df: 0.305 (0.079)
2
Model 2
Base df: 0.168 (0.047)
0-2 ma
Double df: 0.140 (0.044)
0-2 ma
Half df: 0.196 (0.051)
July 2009
E-396
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
0-2 ma
Notes: Model 1 uses current day's
mortality count, while Model 2 uses a 3-
day moving total mortality count.
Reference: Roberts and Martin (2007,
156917)
Period of Study: 1987-2000
Location: 8 U.S. cities and > 100 U.S.
cities (NMMAPS)
Outcome: Mortality: Total (non-
accidental)
Cardiorespiratory
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Increment: 10 //g/m3
P x 1000 (SE x 1000)
lag:
8 U.S. cities
Distributed Lag Model: 0.229
0-2
Weighted Model: 0.315
0-2
Standard Model:
0.276
0
¦0.062
1
0.476
2
90 U.S. cities
Total (non-accidental)
Standard Model:
0.078 (0.039)
0
0.182 (0.037)
1
0.108 (0.036)
2
Moving Total Model: 0.131 (0.023)
0-2
Weighted Model: 0.274 (0.075)
0-2
Cardiorespiratory
Standard Model:
0.096 (0.055)
0
0.232 (0.053)
1
0.226 (0.051)
2
Moving Total Model: 0.174 (0.032)
0-2
Weighted Model: 0.389 (0.105)
0-2
Notes: The 8 U.S. cities consist of
Chicago, Cleveland, Denver, El Paso,
^^Houston^JVIashville^^Pittsburgh^^an^SaJ^
July 2009
E-397
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Lake City.
Reference: Roberts and Martin (2007,
156916)
Period of Study: 1987-2000
Location: 10 U.S. cities (NMMAPS)
Outcome: Mortality: Non-accidental
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
Age Groups: a 65
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD):
Anchorage: 27.32
Chicago: 36.95
Cleveland: 39.83
Detroit: 40.78
El Paso: 40.14
Minneapolis/St. Paul: 28.01
Pittsburgh: 35.09
Salt Lake City: 37.40
Seattle: 28.72
Spokane: 34.52
Range (Min, Max): NR
Increment: NR
P Coefficient (SE)
lag:
Pooled Estimates
Combined Model (Unconstrained
Distributed Lag Model + Piecewise Linear
Dose-Response Function)
Change-point: 60//g|m3
Slope below: 0.00130(0.00016)
0-5
Slope above: -0.00163 (0.00026)
0-5
Change-point: 30//g|m3
Slope below: 0.00014 (0.00039)
0-5
Slope above: -0.00003 (0.00015)
0-5
Piecewise Linear Dose-Response Model
Change-point: 60//g|m3
Slope below: 0.00044 (0.00011)
3-day ma
Slope above: -0.00077 (0.00020)
3- day ma
Change-point: 30//g|m3
Slope below: 0.00022 (0.00026)
3-day ma
Slope above: -0.00004 (0.00011)
3-day ma
Polynomial Distributed Lag Model (degree
2)
0.00046 (0.00011)
0-5
Reference: Samoli et al. (2005, 087436) Outcome: Mortality:
Period of Study: 1990-1997 All-cause (non-accidental) (< 800)
Location: 22 European cities (APHEA-2) Cardiovascular (390-459)
Respiratory (460-519)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Hierarchical
modeling:
1. Poisson GAM, penalized splines
2. Multivariate modeling
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Median (SD) unit:
Range: (Stockholm: 14/yg/m3 to Torino:
65/yg/m3)
Percentile (90th):
Range: (Stockholm: 27 /yglm3 to Torino:
129/yg/m3)
Copollutant (correlation): BS
The study does not present quantitative
results.
July 2009
E-398
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Schwartz (2004, 078998)
Period of Study: 1986-1993
Location: 14 U.S. cities
Outcome: Mortality:
Non-accidental (< 800)
Study Design: Case-crossover
Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Poisson
Age Groups: All ages
Notes: Case days matched to referent
days that had the same temperature.
Pollutant: PM10
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
Mean (SD): NR
lag:
Range (Min, Max): NR
Overall:
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Two stage: 0.36% (0.22, 0.50)
1
1
Single stage: 0.33% (0.19, 0.46)
1
More winter temperature lags:
Two Stage: 0.39% (0.23, 0.56)
1
1
One stage: 0.32% (0.19, 0.46)
i
i
Time stratified with temperature
matching:
Two Stage: 0.39% (0.19, 0.58)
i
1
One Stage: 0.53% (0.34, 0.72)
i
i
Poisson regression:
0.40% (0.18, 0.62)
1
Pollutant: PM10
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
P x 1000 (SE x 1000)
Median (SD) unit: Range: 23 to
lag:
36//g/m3
Matched on CO: 0.527 (0.251)
IQR (25th, 75th):
0-1 avg
Range 25th: 17 to 24//g/m3
Matched on O3: 0.451 (0.170)
Range 75th: 31 to 57 //g/m3
0-1 avg
Copollutant (correlation): CO
Matched on NO2: 0.784 (0.185)
SO2
0-1 avg
NO2
Matched on SO2: 0.811 (0.175)
0s
0-1 avg
Reference: Schwartz (2004, 053506)
Period of Study: 1986-1993
Location: 14 U.S. cities
Outcome: Mortality:
Non-accidental (< 800)
Study Design: Case-crossover
Statistical Analyses: Time-stratified
conditional logistic regression
Age Groups: All ages
Notes: Case days matched to referent
days based on concentration of gaseous
air pollutants. Matched on the following
conditions:
1. 24-h avg SO2 within 1 ppb
2. Daily-maximum O3 within 2 ppb
3. 24-h avg NO2 within 1 ppb
4. 24-h avg CO within 0.03 ppm
Reference: Sharovsky et al. (2004,
156976)
Period of Study: 7/1996-6/1998
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Outcome: Mortality:
Myocardial infarction
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM
Age Groups: a 35
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): 58.2 (25.8)
Range (Min, Max): (23,186)
Increment: 10 //g/m3
PISE)
lag:
PM10: 0.001 (0.001)
Copollutant (correlation): CO: r - 0.73 PM10+CO+SO2: 0.0004 (0.0008)
SO2: r - 0.72
July 2009
E-399
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Simpson et al. (2005,
087438)
Period of Study: 1/1996-12/1999
Location: 4 Australian cities
Outcome: Mortality:
Pollutant: PM10
Non-accidental (< 800)
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Cardiovascular (390-459)
Mean (SD):
Respiratory (460-519)
Brisbane: 16.60
Study Design: Time-series
Sydney: 16.30
meta-analysis
Melbourne: 18.20
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM,
Range (Min, Max):
natural splines
Brisbane: (2.6, 57.6)
Poisson GLM, natural splines
Sydney: (3.7, 75.5)
Age Groups: All ages
Melbourne: (3.3, 51.9)
Copollutant:
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
0.2% (-0.8,1.2)
PM2.6
CO
NO?
Reference: Slaughter et al. (2005,
073854)
Period of Study: 1/1995-12/1999
Location: Spokane, Washington
Outcome: Mortality:
Non-accidental (< 800)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GLM,
natural splines
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): NR
Range (9th, 95th): (7.9, 41.9)//g/m3
Copollutant (correlation):
PM10
PM 10-2.5: r - 0.94
CO: r - 0.32
Increment:: 25 //g/m3
Relative Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
1.00(0.97,1.03)
1
0.98(0.95,1.01)
2
1.00(0.97,1.03)
3
Reference: Staniswalis et al. (2005,
087473)
Period of Study: 1992-1995
Location: El Paso, Texas
Outcome: Mortality:
Pollutant: PM10
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Non-accidental (< 800)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): NR
Range (Min, Max):
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Poisson regression: 1.7%
Principal component analysis (PCA)
(0.2,133.4)
3
Age Groups: All
Notes: The chemical composition and
size distribution of PM was not available,
therefore, the study used wind speed as a
surrogate variable for the PM10
composition.
PCA:
24-hly measurements: 2.06%
3
Daily avg: 1.7%
3
July 2009
E-400
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Stafoggia et al. (2008,
157005)
Period of Study: 1997-2004
Location: 9 Italian cities
Outcome:
Mortality:
Total (non-accidental) (< 800)
Cardiovascular (390-459)
Respiratory (460-519)
Other natural causes
Study Design: Time-stratified
crossover
Statistical Analyses:
Conditional logistic regression
Age Groups: a 35
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD) unit:
Bologna: 50.4 (31.7)
Florence: 37.5 (16.6)
Mestre: 48.1 (26.8)
Milan: 57.9 (38.0)
Palermo: 36.2(21.7)
Pisa: 35.1 (14.9)
Rome: 47.3 (19.9)
Taranto: 59.8 (18.9)
Turin: 71.5(38.1)
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation): NR
July 2009
E-401
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Cardiovascular
All year: 0.63% (0.31,1.38)
0-1
Winter: 0.15% (-0.29, 0.59)
0-1
Spring: 0.72% (-0.07,1.52)
0-1
Summer: 2.90% (1.14,4.69)
0-1
Fall: 1.37% (0.43,2.32)
0-1
Apparent Temperature
< 50th Percentile: 0.31% (-0.06, 0.67)
0-1
50th-75th Percentile: 2.05% (0.47, 3.66)
0-1
> 75th Percentile: 2.68% (1.20,4.17)
0-1
Respiratory
All year: 0.98% (0.27,1.70)
0-1
Winter: 0.41% (-0.67,1.51)
0-1
Spring: 2.99% (1.18, 4.83)
0-1
Summer: 3.89% (0.19, 7.73)
0-1
Fall: 0.45% (-1.11,2.03)
0-1
Apparent Temperature
< 50th Percentile: 0.54% (-0.47,1.57)
0-1
50th-75th Percentile: 3.15% (0.64, 5.73)
0-1
> 75th Percentile: 4.12% (0.44,7.93)
0-1
Other natural causes
All year: 0.37% (0.09, 0.66)
0-1
Winter: 0.14% (-0.36, 0.63)
0-1
Spring: 0.29% (-0.47,1.05)
0-1
Summer: 2.15% (0.90,3.42)
01DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
Fall: 0.70% (-0.41,1.83)
0-1
Annarpnt Tpmnpratnrp
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Stolzel et al. (2007, 091374) Outcome:
Period of Study: 9/1995-8/2001 Mortality:
Location: Erfurt, Germany Total (non-accidental) (< 800)
Cardio-respiratory (390-459,460-519,
785, 786)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses:
Poisson GAM
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PMio Increment: 23/yg/m3
Averaging Time: 24-h avg Relative Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
Mean (SD) unit:: 31.9 (23.2) lag:
IQR (25th, 75th): Total (non-accidental)
(16.5,39.5) 1.004(0.980
Copollutant (correlation): 1.029)
MCo i o.b: r - 0.85 0
MCo.oi-2.b: r - 0.84 1.004(0.981
NO: r- 0.54 1.027)
NO?: r - 0.62 1
CO: r - 0.50 0.998 (0.976
1.021)
2
0.984 (0.962
1.006)
3
0.993 (0.972
1.015)
4
0.990 (0.969
1.012)
5
Cardio- respiratory
1.007 (0.981
1.034)
0
1.006 (0.981
1.032)
1
0.996 (0.971
1.021)
2
0.977 (0.953
1.002)
3
0.994 (0.970
1.018)
4
0.993 (0.969
1.017)
5
July 2009
E-402
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Sullivan et al. (2003,
043156)
Period of Study:
1985-1994
Location: Western Washington
Outcome:
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Study Design: Case-crossover
Statistical Analyses:
Conditional logistic regression
Age Groups: 19-79
Study Population: Out-of-hospital cardiac
arrests: 1,206
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Median (SD) unit:
Lag 0: 28.05
Lag 1: 27.97
Lag 2: 28.40
Range (Min, Max):
(7.38, 89.83)
Copollutant (correlation):
SO?
CO
Notes: Study used nephelometry to
measure particles and equated the
measurements to PM2.6 concentrations.
Increment:: 16.51 /yglm3
Odds Ratio (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Overall
1.05(0.87,1.27)
0
0.91 (0.75,1.11)
1
1.03(0.82,1.28)
2
Reference: Sunyer et al. (2002, 034835) Outcome: Mortality:
Period of Study: 1985-1995
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Respiratory mortality
Study Design: Case-crossover
Statistical Analyses: Condition logistic
regression
Age Groups: >14
Study population: Asthmatic individuals:
5,610
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Median (SD) unit: 61.2
Range (Min, Max): (17.3, 240.7)
Copollutant:
BS
NO?
0s
SO?
CO
Increment: 32.7 /yglm3
Odds Ratio (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Asthmatic individuals with 1 ED visit
0.884 (0.672,1.162)
0-2 avg
Asthmatic individuals with >1 ED visit
1.084 (0.661,1.778)
0-2 avg
Asthma/COPD individuals with >1 ED
visit
1.011 (0.746,1.368)
0-2 avg
July 2009
E-403
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Touloumi et al. (2005,
087477)
Period of Study: 1990-1997
Location: 7 European cities (London,
Budapest, Stockholm, Zurich, Paris, Lyon,
Madrid) (APHEA2)
Outcome: Mortality:
Total (non-accidental) (< 800)
Cardiovascular (390-459)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM,
LOESS
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Median (SD) unit:
London: 25.1
Budapest: 40.2
Stockholm: 13.7
Zurich: 27.5
Paris: 22.2
Lyon: 38.5//
Madrid: 33.4
IQR (25th, 75th):
London: (20.3, 33.9)
Budapest: (34.3, 45.8)
Stockholm: (10.3,19.1)
Zurich: (19.2, 38.5)
Paris: (16.0, 33.0)
Lyon: (29.7, 50.4)
Madrid: (27.6, 41.0)
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Increment: 10 //g/m3
P 1x 1000) (SE 1x 1000)):
Total (non-accidental)
No control: 0.4834 (0.1095)
Reported Influenza Data
Count ID: 0.4967 (0.1089)
11 ID: 0.4740(0.1090)
Ml ID: 0.5019 (0.1096)
RI-ID: 0.4735 (0.1091)
SF ID: 0.6714(0.1080)
Estimated Influenza Data
APHEA-2: 0.5550(0.1076)
11 EID: 0.5640 (0.1073)
Ml EID: 0.5872 (0.1100)
Rl EID: 0.5872 (0.1074)
SF EID: 0.6641 (0.1073)
Cardiovascular
No control: 0.8432 (0.1665)
Reported Influenza Data
Count ID: 0.8896 (0.1662)
11 ID: 0.8545(0.1661)
Ml ID: 0.8693 (0.1674)
RI-ID: 0.8649 (0.1665)
SF ID: 1.0107 (0.1659)
Estimated Influenza Data
APHEA-2: 0.9389(0.1654)
11 EID: 0.9485 (0.1648)
Ml EID: 1.0440 (0.1686)
Rl EID: 0.9718 (0.1653)
SF EID: 1.0585 (0.1652)
Notes: 11 - one indicator for all
epidemics
M1 - multiple indicators, one per
epidemic
R1 - indicators for intervals indicating
the range of influenza counts
SF - separate smooth function during
epidemic periods.
July 2009
E-404
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Tsai et al. (2003, 050480)
Period of Study: 1994-2000
Location: Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Outcome: Mortality:
Total (non-accidental) (< 800)
Respiratory (460-519)
Circulatory (390-459)
Study Design: Bidirectional case-
crossover
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): 81.45
Range (Min, Max): (20.50, 232.00)
Copollutant:
SO?
NO?
CO
0s
Increment: 67.00 /yglm3
Odds Ratio (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Total (non-accidental)
1.000 (0.947,1.056)
0-2 avg
Respiratory
1.023 (0.829,1.264)
0-2 avg
Circulatory
0.971 (0.864,1.092)
0-2 avg
July 2009
E-405
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Vajanapoom et al. (2002,
042542)
Period of Study: 1992-1997
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Outcome: Mortality:
Total (non-accidental) (< 800)
Respiratory (460-519)
Cardiovascular (390-459)
Other-causes
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM,
LOESS
Age Groups:
All ages
55-64
65-74
>75
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): 68.0 (23.9)
IQR (25th, 75th):
(50.1,80.7)
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Increment: 30 //gfm3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Total (non-accidental)
All ages: 2.3% (1.3,3.3)
0-4 ma
55-64: 1.5% (-0.8,3.9)
0-4 ma
65-74: 4.2% (2.0, 6.3)
0-4 ma
>75: 3.9% (2.1,5.6)
0-4 ma
Cardiovascular
All ages: 0.8% (-0.9, 2.4)
0
55-64:-2.5% (-6.3,1.3)
0
65-74: 2.9% (-0.7, 6.5)
0
>75:1.6% (-1.8, 5.0)
0
Respiratory
All ages: 5.1% (0.6, 9.6)
0-2 ma
55-64: 1.4% (-11.3,14.2)
0-2 ma
65-74: 2.8% (-9.5,15.2)
0-2 ma
>75: 10.2% (-0.1,20.5)
0-2 ma
Other-causes
All ages: 2.4% (1.3,3.5)
0-4 ma
55-64: 1.7% (-1.1,4.5)
0-4 ma
65-74: 5.6% (3.1,8.1)
0-4 ma
>75: 3.7% (1.8,5.6)
0-4 ma
July 2009
E-406
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Vedal et al. (2003, 039044)
Outcome: Mortality:
Pollutant: PM10
The study does not present quantitative
results
Period of Study: 111994-1211996
Total (non-accidental) (< 800)
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia,
Respiratory (460-519)
Mean (SD): 14.4 (5.9)
Canada
Cardiovascular (390-459)
Range (Min, Max): (4.1, 37.2)
Study Design: Time-series
Copollutant (correlation): O3: r
- 0.48
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM,
SO2: r - 0.76
LOESS
NO?: r - 0.84
Age Groups: All ages
CO: r - 0.71
Reference: Venners et al. (2003,
089931)
Period of Study: 1/1995-12/1995
Location: Chongqing, China
Outcome: Mortality:
Total (non-accidental) (< 800)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM,
cubic spline
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): 146.8
Range (Min, Max): (44.7, 666.2)
Copollutant: SO2
Notes: PM10 was measured for only 7
months of the study period.
Increment: 100/yg/m3
Relative Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
1.00(0.93,1.07)
0
0.98(0.91,1.04)
1
1.00(0.93,1.07)
2
0.96(0.90,1.03)
3
0.97 (0.90,1.03)
4
0.99(0.93,1.06)
5
July 2009
E-407
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Vichit-Vadakan et al. (2008,
157095)
Period of Study: 111999-1212003
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Outcome (ICD10): Mortality:
Non-accidental (A00-R99)
Cardiovascular (I00-I99)
Ischemic heart diseases (I20-I25)
Stroke (I60-I69)
Conduction disorder (I44-I49)
Respiratory (J00-J98)
Lower Respiratory Infection (J10-J22)
C0PD (J40-J47)
Asthma (J45-J46)
Senility (R54)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson, natural
cubic spline
Age Groups: All ages
0-4
5-44
18-50
45-64
>50
>65
>75
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): 52.1 (20.1)
Range (Min, Max): (21.3,169.2)
Copollutant (correlation): NR
July 2009
E-408
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Excess Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Cause-specific mortality:
Nonaccidental: 1.3% (0.8,1.7)
0-1
Cardiovascular: 1.9% (0.8, 3.0)
0-1
Ischemic heart disease: 1.5% (-0.4, 3.5)
0-1
Stroke: 2.3% (0.6, 4.0)
0-1
Conduction disorders: -0.%3 (-5.9, 5.6)
0-1
Cardiovascular:
> 65 1.8 (0.2, 3.3)
0-1
Respiratory
All ages: 1.0 (-0.4, 2.4)
0-1
~ 1:14.6(2.9, 27.6)
0-1
>65: 1.3(-0.8, 3.3)
0-1
LRI:
<5: 7.7(-3.6, 20.3)
0-1
C0PD: 1.3 (-1.8, 4.4)
0-1
Asthma: 7.4 (1.1,14.1)
0-1
Senility: 1.8(0.7,2.8)
0-1
Age-specific for non-accidental
0-4: 0.2 (-2.0, 2.4)
0-1
5-44: 0.9(0.2,1.7)
0-1
18-50:1.2(0.5,1.9)
0-1
45-64: 1.1 (0.4,1.9)
0-1
>50: 1.4 (0.9,1.9)
0-1
>65: 1.5(0.9,2.1)
0-1
>75: 2.2(1.3,3.0)
01DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
Sex-specific for non-accidental
Male: 1.2(0.7,1.7)
0-1
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Villeneuve et al. (2003,
055051)
Period of Study: 1986-1999
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Outcome: Mortality:
Non-accidental (< 800)
Cardiovascular (401-440)
Respiratory (460-519)
Cancer (140-239)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson, natural
splines
Age Groups: a 65
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD):
Daily 14.0
Every 6th Day 19.6
Range (Min, Max):
Daily (3.8, 52.2)
Every 6th Day (3.5, 63.0)
Copollutant:
SO?
CO
NO?
0s
PM2.6
PMio-2.5
Increment: 15.4/yg/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Non-accidental
3.7% (-0.5, 8.0)
0-2 avg
2.6% (-0.9, 6.1)
0
2.7% (-0.7, 6.2)
1
1.9% (-1.4,5.3)
2
Cardiovascular
3.4% (-2.7, 9.8)
0-2 avg
5.1% (0.0,10.4)
0
1.3% (-3.8, 6.7)
1
0.6% (-4.3, 5.7)
2
Respiratory
PM10
0.1% (-9.5,10.8)
0-2 avg
1.0% (-7.5,10.4)
0
0.4% (-7.7, 9.3)
1
¦1.3% (-8.9,7.1)
2
Cancer
1.2% (-6.9,10.1)
0-2 avg
¦2.5% (-8.8, 4.3)
0
2.3% (-4.6, 9.6)
1
3.3% (-3.7,10.8)
2
July 2009
E-409
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Welty et al. (2008,157134)
Outcome: Mortality:
Pollutant: PMio
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Period of Study: 1987-2000
Total (non-accidental)
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
% Excess Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Study Design: Time-series
Mean (SD): NR
lag:
Statistical Analyses: Poisson—Gibbs
Sampler
Bayesian Distributed Lag Model
Range (Min, Max): NR
Poisson-Gibbs Sampler
Copollutant (correlation): NR
0.17% (0.01,0.34)
3
Age Groups: All ages
¦0.24% (-0.73, 0.23)
0-14
Unconstrained: -0.19% (-0.86, 0.48)
0-14
Bayesian Distributed Lag Model
¦0.21% (-0.86, 0.41)
0-14
Reference: Welty and Zeger (2005,
087484)
Period of Study: 1987-2000
Location: 100 U.S. cities (NMMAPS)
Outcome: Mortality:
Pollutant: PMio
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Total (non-accidental) (< 800)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Bayesian
hierarchical model
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation): NR
% Increase (SE)
lag:
Distributed Lag Model: Seasonally-
Temporally Varying
Age Groups: All ages Temperature variables: 0,1-2, 1-7, 1-14
S(t, 1 x years): 0.229 (0.053)
1
S(t, 2 x years): 0.220 (0.053)
1
S(t, 4 x years): 0.187 (0.050)
1
S(t, 8 x years): 0.178 (0.049)
1
Temperature variables: 0,1-2,1 -7,1-14,
0x1.2,0x1.7,1-2 x 1-7
S(t, 1 x years): 0.195 (0.048)
1
S(t, 2 x years): 0.200 (0.051)
1
S(t, 4 x years): 0.176 (0.050)
1
S(t, 8 x years): 0.149 (0.050)
1
Distributed Lag Model: Nonlinear
Temperature variables: 0,1-2,1-7,1-14
S(t, 4 x years): 0.239 (0.053)
1
Temperature variables: 0,1-2,1 -7,1-14,
0x1-2,0x1-7,1-2 x 1-7
S(t, 4 x years): 0.172 (0.045)
1
Temperature variables: S(0,2), S(1 -2,2),
S(1 -7,2), S(1 -14,2)
July 2009
E-410
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
S(t, 4 x years): 0.186 (0.046)
1
Temperature variables: S(0,2), S(1 -2,2),
S(1 -7,2), S(1 -14,2), S(0x 1-2,2), S(0x1-
7,2), S(1-2 x 1-72)
S(t, 4 x years): 0.189 (0.047)
1
Temperature variables: S(0,4), S(1 -2,4),
S(1 -7,4), S(1 -14,4)
S(t, 4 x years): 0.175 (0.046)
1
Temperature variables: S(0,4), S(1 -2,4),
S(1 -7,4), S(1 -14,4), S(0x 1-2,4), S(0x 1-
7,4), S(1-2 x 1-7,4)
S(t, 4 x years): 0.190 (0.048)
1
Temperature variables: 0,1-2,1-7
S(t, 4 x years): 0.252 (0.053)
1
Temperature variables: 0,1-2,1-7, 0x1-
2, 0x1-7,1-2 x 1-7
S(t, 4 x years): 0.186 (0.044)
1
Temperature variables: S(0,2), S(1 -2,2),
S(1-7,2)
S(t, 4 x years): 0.198 (0.046)
1
Temperature variables: S(0,2), S(1 -2,2),
S(1 -7,2), S(0x 1-2,2), S(0x 1-7,2), S(1-2
x 1-7,2)
S(t, 4 x years): 0.201 (0.047)
1
Temperature variables: S(0,4), S(1 -2,4),
S(1-7,4)
S(t, 4 x years): 0.189 (0.045)
1
Temperature variables: S(0,4), S(1 -2,4),
S(1 -7,4), S(0x 1-2,2), S(0x 1-7,4), S(1-2
x 1-7,2)
S(t, 4 x years): 0.205 (0.047)
1
Temperature variables: S(0,4), S(1 -2,4)
S(t, 4 x years): 0.250 (0.045)
1
Temperature variables: S(0,4), S(1 -2,4),
S(0x 1-2,4)
S(t, 4 x years): 0.253 (0.044)
1
Temperature variables: S(0,4)
S(t, 4 x years): 0.220 (0.045)
July 2009
E-411
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Notes: 0 indicates current-day
temperature
1-r indicates avg of lag 1 through lag r
temperature
S (, ~) indicates a natural spline smooth
with ~ degrees of freedom.
S (t, ~ x years) indicates the natural
spline smooth of time with degrees of
freedom equal to ~ x (number of years of
data).
Reference: Wong et al. (2007, 098391) Outcome: Mortality:
Period of Study: 1/1998-12/1998
Location: Hong Kong, China
Total (non-accidental) (< 800)
Cardiorespiratory (390-519)
Study Design: Main analysis: Time-
series
Sensitivity analysis: Case-crossover,
case-only
Statistical Analyses: Main analysis:
Poisson GAM
Sensitivity analysis: Conditional logistic
regression
Age Groups: £ 30
> 65
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD):
48.1 (24.3)
Range (Min, Max):
(15.5,140.5)
Copollutant:
NO?
SO?
0s
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Excess Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Main Analysis
Non-accidental
Smokers: > 301:.80% (0.35, 3.26)
0
1.77% (0.46, 3.11)
2
> 65: 3.20% (1.36,5.07)
0
2.42% (0.73, 4.13)
2
Never-smokers
> 30: -0.37% (-2.23,1.52)
0
¦0.03% (-1.72,1.66)
2
> 65P -0.70% (-2.81,1.46)
0
¦0.13% (-2.04,1.80)
2
Cardiorespiratory
Smokers
> 30: 1.43% (-0.86, 3.78)
0
2.32% (0.24, 4.44)
2
> 65: 2.98% (0.47, 5.55)
0
2.61% (0.31,4.95)
2
Never-smokers
> 30: 0.02% (-2.75, 2.87)
0
¦0.79% (-3.33,1.82)
July 2009
E-412
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
2
> 65: 0.25% (-2.62, 3.19)
0
¦0.66% (-3.29, 2.04)
2
Sensitivity Analysis
Poisson Regression
Non-accidental
>30: 1.81% (0.21,3.44)
0
1.93% (0.32, 3.56)
2
1.99% (0.14,3.87)
0-3
>65: 2.31% (0.37, 4.29)
0
2.16% (0.20, 4.15)
2
2.57% (0.30, 4.89)
0-3
Cardiorespiratory
> 30: 1.04% (-1.45, 3.59)
0
2.18% (-0.35, 4.77)
2
1.66% (-1.24,4.64)
0-3
> 65: 1.69% (-0.93, 4.37)
0
2.44% (-0.23, 5.18)
2
2.30% (-0.80, 5.50)
0-3
Case-only: Logistic Regression
Non-accidental
> 30: 1.79% (0.21,3.37)
0
1.94% (0.33, 3.56)
2
> 65: 2.30% (0.42, 4.17)
0
2.16% (0.26, 4.07)
2
Cardiorespiratory
>30: 1.01% (-1.37,3.40)
July 2009
E-413
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
0
2.16% (-0.28, 4.61)
2
> 65: 1.65% (-0.96, 4.27)
0
2.42% (-0.27, 5.12)
2
Case-crossover
Non-accidental
> 30: 2.54% (0.35, 4.78)
0
1.35% (-0.81,3.56)
2
> 65: 3.96% (1.37,6.63)
0
2.20% (-0.35, 4.81)
2
Cardiorespiratory
> 30: 0.48% (-2.74, 3.80)
0
3.24% (-0.03, 6.61)
2
>65: 2.17% (-1.40, 5.86)
0
3.43% (-0.13,7.13)
2
Reference: Wong et al. (2007, 093278) Outcome: Mortality:
Period of Study: 1/1998-12/1998
Location: Hong Kong, China
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD):
48.1 (24.3)
Range (Min, Max):
(15.5,140.5)
Copollutant:
Sensitivity analysis: Logistic regression NO2
Age Groups: £ 30
> 65
Total (non-accidental) (< 800)
Cardiorespiratory (390-519)
Study Design: Main analysis: Time-
series
Sensitivity analysis: Case-only
Statistical Analyses: Main analysis:
Poisson GAM, natural cubic spline
SO?
0s
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Excess Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Non-accidental
Exercise
>30: 0.13% (-1.16,1.44)
1
> 65: 0.24% (-1.16,1.67)
1
Never-exercise
> 30: 1.04% (0.07,2.02)
1
> 65: 1.26% (0.27,2.27)
1
Cardiorespiratory
Exercise
> 30: 0.46% (-1.43, 2.39)
1
> 65: 0.30% (-1.65, 2.29)
July 2009
E-414
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
1
Never-exercise
> 30: 0.97% (-0.36, 2.32)
1
> 65: 0.98% (-0.45, 2.43)
1
Difference in % Excess Risk (Exercise vs.
Never-Exercise)
Non-accidental
Poisson Regression
> 30: -2.86% (-4.03 to-1.67)
1
> 65: -3.06% (-4.37 to-1.74)
1
Case-only
> 30: -2.91% (-4.04 to-1.77)
1
> 65: -3.12% (-4.38 to-1.84)
1
Cardiorespiratory
Poisson regression
> 30: -2.55% (-4.32 to-0.75)
1
> 65: -2.64% (-4.48 to-0.76)
1
Case-only
> 30: -2.63% (-4.32 to-0.92)
1
> 65: -2.73% (-4.50 to-0.92)
1
Adjusted Case-only
Non-accidental
Sex
> 30: -2.88% (-1.73 to-4.01)
1
> 65: -3.09% (-1.82 to-4.35)
1
Education
> 30: -2.94% (-1.80 to -4.07)
1
> 65: -3.18% (-1.90 to-4.44)
1
Job
> 30: -2.88% (-1.74 to -4.02)
1
July 2009
E-415
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
> 65: -3.11% (-1.83 to-4.37)
1
Smoking
> 30: -2.82% (-1.66 to-3.96)
1
> 65: -2.97% (-1.68 to-4.25)
1
Illness time
> 30: -2.94% (-1.80 to -4.07)
1
> 65: -3.16% (-1.88 to-4.42)
1
Cardiorespiratory
Sex
> 30: -2.61% (-0.89 to -4.29)
1
> 65: -2.71% (-0.90 to-4.48)
1
Education
> 30: -2.58% (-0.85 to-4.27)
1
> 65: -2.77% (-0.95 to -4.54)
1
Job
> 30: -2.68% (-0.96 to-4.37)
1
> 65: -2.68% (-0.88 to -4.46)
1
Smoking
> 30: -2.46% (-0.73 to-4.17)
1
> 65: -2.50% (-0.68 to-4.29)
1
Illness Time
> 30: -2.63% (-0.91 to -4.32)
1
> 65: -2.73% (-0.92 to-4.51)
1
Case-only by Exercise Group (Never as
Reference)
Non-accidental
>30
Low:-3.34% (-5.77 to -0.85)
1
Moderate: -6.32% (-8.55 to -4.03)
July 2009
E-416
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
1
High: -1.74% (-3.06 to-0.40)
1
>65
Low:-3.79% (-6.67 to 0.82)
1
Moderate:-7.78% (-10.39 to-5.10)
1
High: -1.77% (-3.21 to-0.31)
1
Cardiorespiratory
>30
Low:-3.95% (-7.77,0.04)
1
Moderate: -8.50% (-11.84 to -5.02)
1
High:-0.62% (-2.58,1.38)
1
>65
Low:-3.97% (-8.17,0.43)
1
Moderate: -9.42% (-13.00 to -5.69)
1
High:-0.68% (-2.71,1.38)
1
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Relative Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Respiratory
1.008 (1.001 to 1.014)
1
C0PD
1.017 (1.002,1.033)
0-3
Pneumonia & Influenza
1.007 (0.999,1.015)
2
Cardiovascular
1.003 (0.998,1.016)
2
IHD
1.013(1.001,1.025)
0-3
Cerebrovascular
1.007 (0.998,1.016)
Reference: Wong et al. (2002, 025436) Outcome: Mortality:
Period of Study: 1995-1998
Location: Hong Kong, China
Respiratory (461-519)
C0PD (490-496)
Pneumonia & Influenza (480-487)
Cardiovascular (390-459)
IHD (410-414)
Cerebrovascular (430-438)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
Age Groups: £ 30
> 65
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD):
51.53 (24.79)
Range (Min, Max):
(14.05,163.79)
Copollutant (correlation):
NO?: r - 0.780
SO?: r - 0.344
O3: r - 0.538
July 2009
E-417
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Respiratory
PM10+SO2+O3+NO2: 1.005(0.992,
1.010)
1
COPD
PM10+SO2+O3+NO2: 0.991 (0.968,
1.015)
0-3
PM10+O3+NO2: 0.993 (0.970,1.016)
0-3
Pneumonia 81 Influenza
PM10+SO2+O3+NO2: 1.002(0.991,
1.013)
2
IHD
0.994 (0.978,1.009)
0-3
Reference: Wong et al. (2008,157152) Outcome (ICD10): Mortality:
Period of Study: Bangkok: 1999-2003 Natural causes (A00-R99)
Hong Kong: 1996-2002
Shanghai & Wuhan: 2001-2004
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Cardiovascular (I00-I99)
Respiratory (J00-J98)
Study Design: Time-series
Hong Kong, Shanghai, and Wuhan, China Statistical Analyses: Poisson GLM,
natural splines
Age Groups: All ages
> 65
> 75
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD):
Bangkok: 52.0
Hong Kong: 51.6
Shanghai: 102.0
Wuhan: 141.8
Range (Min, Max):
Bangkok: (21.3,169.2)
Hong Kong: (13.7,189.0)
Shanghai: (14.0, 566.8)
Wuhan: (24.8, 477.8)
Copollutant:
NO2
SO2
0s
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Excess Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Random Effects (4 cities)
Natural causes: 0.55% (0.26, 0.85)
0-1
Cardiovascular: 0.58% (0.22, 0.93)
0-1
Respiratory: 0.62% (0.22,1.02)
0-1
Random Effects (3 Chinese cities)
Natural causes: 0.37% (0.21, 0.54)
0-1
Cardiovascular: 0.44% (0.19, 0.68)
0-1
Respiratory: 0.60% (0.16,1.04)
0-1
Sensitivity Analysis
Random Effects (4 cities)
Omit PM10 > 95th: 0.53% (0.27,0.78)
0-1
Omit PM10 > 75th: 0.53% (0.29,0.78)
0-1
Omit PM10 > 180 /yglm3: 0.65% (0.24,
1.06)
0-1
Omit stations with high traffic source:
0.55% (0.26, 0.85)
0-1
July 2009
E-418
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Warm seasondichotomous variables:
0.86% (0.11,1.60)
0-1
Add temperature at lag 1-2 days: 0.51%
(0.23, 0.79)
0-1
Add temperature at lag 3-7 days: 0.35%
(0.14,0.57)
0-1
Daily PMio defined by centering: 0.54%
(0.26, 0.82)
0-1
Natural spline with (8, 4, 4f: 0.54%
(0.26, 0.81)
0-1
Penalized spline: 0.52% (0.26, 0.77)
0-1
Random Effects (3 Chinese cities)
Omit PMio > 95th: 0.47% (0.21,0.73)
0-1
Omit PMio > 75th: 0.55% (0.24,0.85)
0-1
Omit PMio>180/yg/m3: 0.46% (0.15,
0.76)
0-1
Omit stations with high traffic source:
0.38% (0.20, 0.57)
0-1
Warm season dichotomous variables:
0.43% (0.10, 0.76)
0-1
Add temperature at lag 1-2 days: 0.36%
(0.18, 0.53)
0-1
Add temperature at lag 3-7 days: 0.25%
(0.10, 0.40)
0-1
Daily PMio defined by centering: 0.37%
(0.21,0.53)
0-1
Natural spline with (8, 4, 4f: 0.36%
(0.23, 0.49)
0-1
Penalized spline: 0.34% (0.23, 0.45)
0-1
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Excess Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Non-accidental:
Low SDI
Reference: Wong et al. (2008,157151) Outcome (ICD10): Mortality: Pollutant: PMio
Period of Study: 1/1996-12/2002 Non-accidental (A00-T99 Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Location: Hong Kong Z00-Z99) Mean (SD):
Cardiovascular (I00-I99) 51.6 (25.3)
Respiratory (J00-J98) Range (Min, Max):
July 2009
E-419
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GLM,
natural splines
Age Groups: All ages
(13.5,188.5)
Copollutant:
NO?
SO?
Os
0.37(-0.10, 0.84)
0
0.40 (-0.04, 0.84)
1
0.14(-0.28, 0.57)
2
-0.12(-0.55, 0.30)
3
-0.14(-0.56, 0.28)
4
Middle SDI
0.70(0.34,1.07)
0
0.48 (0.14,0.82)
1
0.35 (0.02, 0.68)
2
0.18(-0.14, 0.51)
3
0.17(-0.16, 0.50)
4
High SDI
0.22 (-0.29, 0.73)
0
0.46(-0.01,0.94)
1
0.29(-0.17,0.75)
2
-0.05(-0.51,0.40)
3
-0.06(-0.51,0.40)
4
All areas
0.45 (0.19,0.72)
0
0.40 (0.15,0.64)
1
0.22 (-0.02, 0.45)
2
0.00 (-0.24, 0.23)
3
0.03 (-0.20, 0.26)
4
Cardiovascular:
Low SDI
July 2009
E-420
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
0.14(-0.77,1.06)
0
0.64 (-0.21,1.49)
1
0.24 (-0.58,1.07)
2
-0.27(-1.09, 0.55)
3
0.01 (-0.80, 0.83)
4
Middle SDI
0.66(0.00,1.34)
0
0.49 (-0.13,1.12)
1
0.80(0.20,1.40)
2
0.65(0.06,1.25)
3
0.52(-0.07,1.12)
4
High SDI
0.83(-0.08,1.75)
0
0.89(0.04,1.75)
1
0.12(-0.70, 0.95)
2
-0.09(-0.91,0.73)
3
0.04 (-0.77,0.86)
4
All areas
0.52(0.05,1.00)
0
0.58(0.14,1.03)
1
0.43 (0.00, 0.86)
2
0.14(-0.28, 0.57)
3
0.23 (-0.20, 0.65)
4
Respiratory:
Low SDI
July 2009
E-421
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
0 0.691-0.44,1.82)
0
1 0.551-0.50,1.61)
1
2 0.361-0.66,1.39)
2
3-0.24 (-1.25,0.78)
3
4-0.171-1.17,0.85)
4
Middle SDI
0.31 (-0.50,1.13)
0
0.77 (0.01,1.53)
1
0.85(0.12,1.59)
2
0.66(-0.07,1.39)
3
0.69(-0.03,1.42)
4
High SDI
0.27(-0.85,1.40)
0
0.72(-0.32,1.78)
1
1.46 (0.45,2.47)
2
0.70(-0.30,1.71)
3
0.48 (-0.52,1.48)
4
All areas
0.39 (-0.20, 0.99)
0
0.70(0.15,1.26)
1
0.89(0.36,1.42)
2
0.45 (-0.08, 0.98)
3
0.43 (-0.10, 0.96)
4
High SDI vs. Middle SDI
Non-accidental: 0.23 (-0.25, 0.72)
July 2009
E-422
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
0-1
Cardiovascular: 0.49 (-0.40,1.40)
0-1
Respiratory: 0.49 (-0.58,1.58)
0-1
High SDI vs. Low SDI
Non-accidental: 0.12 ( 0.42, 0.67)
0-1
Cardiovascular: 0.82 (-0.20,1.86)
0-1
Respiratory: -0.15 (-1.39,1.10)
0-1
Trend Test
Non-accidental: 0.04 (-0.15, 0.22)
0-1
Cardiovascular: 0.27 (-0.07, 0.61)
0-1
Respiratory: -0.04 (-0.46, 0.37)
0-1 SDI - Social Deprivation Index. The
higher the SDI the lower the SES of the
individual.
Reference: Yang et al. (2004, 055603)
Period of Study: 1994-1998
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Outcome: Mortality:
Non-accidental (< 800)
Circulatory (390-459)
Respiratory (460-519)
Study Design: Bi-directional case-
crossover
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): 51.99
Range (Min, Max): (13.71,211.30)
Copollutant:
SO?
NO?
CO
0s
Increment: 31.43 /yglm3
Odds Ratio (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Non-accidental
0.995 (0.971,1.020)
0
Respiratory
0.986 (0.906,1.074)
0
Circulatory
0.988 (0.942,1.035)
Reference: Zanobetti et al. (2003,
042812)
Period of Study: 1990-1997
Location: 10 European cities (APHEA2)
Outcome: Mortality:
Pollutant: PMio
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Non-accidental (< 800)
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
% Increase (Lower CI,
Circulatory (390-459)
Mean (SD):
lag:
Respiratory (460-519)
Athens: 42.7 (12.9)
Cardiovascular
Study Design: Time-series
Budapest: 41 (9.1)
0.69% (0.31,1.08)
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM
Lodz: 53.5 (15.5)
0-1 avg
Age Groups: 15-64
London: 28.8(13.7)
40-day distributed lag
65-74
Madrid: 37.8 (17.7)
1.99% (1.44,2.54)
>75
Paris: 22.5(11.5)
4th degree
Prague: 76.2 (45.7)
1.97% (1.38, 2.55)
Rome: 58.7(17.4)
Unrestricted
Stockholm: 15.5 (7.9)
Respiratory
Tel Aviv: 50.3 (57.5)
0.74% (-0.17,1.66)
Range (Min, Max): NR
0-1 avg
July 2009
E-423
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Copollutant (correlation!: NR
40-day distributed lag
4.21% (1.70, 6.79)
4th degree
4.20% (1.08,7.42)
Unrestricted
Unrestricted distributed lags
Cardiovascular
1.34% (0.89,1.79)
20
1.72% (1.20, 2.25)
30
1.97% (1.38, 2.55)
40
Respiratory
1.71% (-0.65, 4.12)
20
2.62% (0.19, 5.11)
30
4.20% (1.08,7.42)
40
40-day lags
Non-accidental
15-64
¦0.25% (-0.87, 0.36)
4th degree
¦0.01 (-0.76, 0.75)
Unrestricted
65-74
0.78% (0.23,1.33)
4th degree
0.74% (0.02,1.45)
Unrestricted
>75
1.84% (0.92, 2.78)
4th degree
1.94% (1.07, 2.81)
Unrestricted
Cardiovascular
65-74
2.06% (1.05, 3.09)
4th degree
1.62(0.54,2.70)
Unrestricted
> 75
2.35% (1.42, 3.29)
July 2009
E-424
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
4th degree
2.52% (1.57, 3.48)
Unrestricted
Respiratory
> 75
4.57% (1.25,7.99)
4th degree
4.52% (0.89, 8.28)
Unrestricted
Reference: Zeka et al. (2005, 088068)
Period of Study: 111989-1212000
Location: 20 U.S. cities
Outcome (ICD10): Mortality:
All-cause (non-accidental) (V01-Y98)
Heart Disease (101-151)
IHD (I20-I25)
Myocardial infarction (121,122)
Dysrhythmias (I46-I49)
Heart failure (I50)
Stroke (I60-I69)
Respiratory (J00-J99)
Pneumonia (J12-J18)
COPD (J40-J44, J47)
Study Design: Time-stratified case-
crossover
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD):
Birmingham: 31.9 (18.0) //g/m3
Boulder: 22.1 (11.3)
Caton: 26.6 (11.5)
Chicago: 33.7 (16.4)
Cincinnati: 31.4 (13.9)
Cleveland: 37.5(18.7)
Colorado Springs: 24.0 (13.2)
Columbus: 28.5 (12.5)
Denver: 28.5 (12.8)
Detroit: 32.1 (17.7)
Honolulu: 15.9 (6.8)
Minneapolis: 24.7 (12.3)
Nashville: 30.1 (12.1)
New Haven: 25.4 (14.4)
Pittsburgh: 30.2 (18.5)
Provo: 33.7 (22.2)
Seattle: 26.4 (14.7)
Salt lake City: 35.0 (20.8)//
Terra Haute: 29.2 (14.6) fj
Youngstown: 30.8 (13.9)
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Single-lag model
All-Cause (non-accidental)
0.20% (0.08, 0.32)
0
0.35% (0.21,0.49)
1
0.24% (0.14,0.34)
2
Respiratory
0.34% (-0.07, 0.75)
0
0.52% (0.15, 0.89)
1
0.51% (0.16, 0.86)
2
COPD
¦0.06% (-0.63, 0.51)
0
0.43% (-0.14,1.00)
1
0.39% (-0.16, 0.94)
2
Pneumonia
0.50% (0.09,1.09)
0
0.59% (-0.12,1.30)
1
0.82% (0.25,1.39)
2
Heart disease
0.12% (-0.06, 0.30)
0
0.30% (0.12, 0.48)
July 2009
E-425
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
1
0.37% (0.17, 0.57)
2
IHD
0.19% (-0.03, 0.41)
0
0.41% (0.19, 0.63)
1
0.43% (0.10, 0.76)
2
Myocardial Infarction
0.36% (-0.05, 0.77)
0
0.17% (-0.18, 0.52)
1
0.13% (-0.22, 0.48)
2
Heart Failure
0.17% (-0.63, 0.97)
0
¦0.01% (-0.81,0.79)
1
0.78% (-0.004,1.56)
2
Dysrhythmias
¦0.23% (-1.41,0.95)
0
0.37% (-0.47,1.21)
1
0.33% (-0.55,1.21)
2
Stroke
0.09% (-0.49, 0.60)
0
0.41% (-0.02, 0.84)
1
0.14% (-0.27, 0.55)
2
Unconstrained distributed lag model
All-cause (non-accidental)
0.45% (0.25, 0.65)
0-3
Respiratory
0.87% (0.38,1.36)
0-3
July 2009
E-426
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
COPD
0.43% (-0.35,1.21)
0-3
Pneumonia
1.24% (0.46, 2.02)
0-3
Heart Disease
0.50% (0.25, 0.75)
0-3
IHD
0.65% (0.32, 0.98)
Myocardial Infarction
0.36% (-0.25, 0.97)
0-3
Heart Failure
0.60% (-0.50,1.70)
0-3
Dysrhythmias
0.20% (-1.03,1.43)
0-3
Stroke
0.46% (-0.13,1.05)
0-3
Reference: Zeka et al. (2006, 088749)
Outcome (ICD10): Mortality:
Pollutant: PMio
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Period of Study: 111989-1212000
All-cause (non-accidental) (V01-Y98)
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
Location: 20 U.S. cities
Heart Disease (101-151)
Mean (SD):
lag: All-cause (non-accidental)
Myocardial infarction (121,122)
Birmingham: 31.9 (18.0) //g/m3
Male: 0.46% (0.28, 0.64)
Stroke (I60-I69)
Boulder: 22.1 (11.3)
1-2 avg
Respiratory (J00-J99)
Caton: 26.6 (11.5)
Female: 0.37% (0.17, 0.57)
Study Design: Time-stratified case-
Chicago: 33.7 (16.4)
1-2 avg
crossover
Cincinnati: 31.4 (13.9)
White
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Cleveland: 37.5(18.7)
0.40% (0.22, 0.58)
Age Groups:
Colorado Springs: 24.0 (13.2)
1-2 avg
All ages
Columbus: 28.5 (12.5)
Black: 0.37% (-0.02, 0.76)
<65
Denver: 28.5 (12.8)
1-2 avg
65-75
Detroit: 32.1 (17.7)
Age: <65:0.25% (0.01,0.49)
>75
Honolulu: 15.9 (6.8)
Minneapolis: 24.7 (12.3)
Nashville: 30.1 (12.1)
New Haven: 25.4 (14.4)
Pittsburgh: 30.2 (18.5)
Provo: 33.7 (22.2)
Seattle: 26.4 (14.7)
Salt lake City: 35.0 (20.8)
Terra Haute: 29.2 (14.6)
1-2 avg
75: 0.23% (-0.06, 0.52)
1-2 avg
>75:0.64% (0.44,0.84)
1-2 avg
Educational Attainment: Low (< 8
yrs): 0.62% (0.29, 0.95)
1-2 avg
Medium (8-12 yrs): 0.36% (0.12, 0.60)
July 2009
E-427
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Youngstown: 30.8 (13.9)
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation): NR
1-2 avg
High (>12 yrs): 0.27% (-0.004, 0.54)
1-2 avg
Location of Death: In hospital: 0.22%
(0.04, 0.40)
1-2 avg
Out of hospital: 0.71% (0.51, 0.91)
1-2 avg
Season: Winter: 0.28% (0.04, 0.52)
1-2 avg
Summer: 0.19% (-0.22, 0.60)
1-2 avg
Transition (spring/fall): 0.49% (0.25,
0.73)
1-2 avg
Respiratory
Male: 0.71% (0.004,1.42)
0-3
Female: 1.04% (0.33,1.75)
0-3
White: 0.88% (0.33,1.43)
0-3
Black: 0.71% (-0.56,1.98)
0-3
Age: <65:0.94% (-0.31,2.19)
0-3
65-75: 0.87% (-0.25,1.99)
0-3
>75:0.88% (0.17,1.59)
0-3
Educational Attainment: Low (< 8
yrs): 0.82% (-0.32,1.96)
0-3
Medium (8-12 yrs): 0.88% (0.12,1.64)
0-3
High (>12 yrs): 0.88% (-0.04,1.80)
0-3
Location of Death: In hospital: 0.78%
(0.17,1.39)
0-3
Out of hospital: 1.09% (0.25,1.93)
0-3
Season: Winter: -0.007% (-0.87, 0.86)
0-3
Summer: 0.69% (-0.68, 2.06)
0-3
^ransjtmn_(s£ring/fall)Mi57%_(0;86;__
July 2009
E-428
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
2.28)
0-3
Heart Disease
Male: 0.54% (0.23, 0.85)
2
Female: 0.46% (0.15, 0.77)
2
White
0.50% (0.25, 0.75)
2
Black: 0.64% (0.13,1.15)
2
Age: <65:0.04% (-0.45,0.53)
2
65-75: 0.60% (0.13,1.07)
2
>75:0.65% (0.30,1.00)
2
Educational Attainment: Low (< 8
yrs): 0.72% (0.23,1.21)
2
Medium (8-12 yrs): 0.38% (0.07, 0.69)
2
High (>12 yrs): 0.54% (0.13,0.95)
2
Location of Death: In hospital: 0.15%
(-0.14,0.44)
2
Out of hospital: 0.93% (0.60,1.26)
2
Season: Winter: 0.41% (-0.002, 0.82)
2
Summer: 0.52 (0.03,1.01)
2
Transition (spring/fall): 0.56% (0.13,
0.99)
2
Myocardial Infarction
Male: 0.21% (-0.40,0.82)
0
Female: 0.59% (0.08,1.10)
0
White
0.24% (-0.27, 0.75)
0
Black: 0.99% (0.05,1.93)
July 2009
E-429
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
0
<65:0.12% (-0.76,1.00)
0
65-75: 0.92% (0.21,1.63)
0
>75:0.16% (-0.58, 0.90)
0
Educational Attainment: Low (< 8
yrs): 0.33% (-0.83,1.49)
0
Medium (8-12 yrs): 0.79% (0.28,1.30)
0
High (>12 yrs):-0.13% (-0.82,0.56)
0
Location of Death: In hospital: 0.34%
(-0.11,0.79)
0
Out of hospital: 0.48% (-0.23,1.19)
0
Season: Winter: 0.32% (-0.37,1.01)
0
Summer: 0.30% (-0.82,1.42)
0
Transition (spring/fall): 0.38% -0.31,
1.07)
0
Stroke
Male: 0.11% (-0.58,0.80)
1
Female: 0.59% (-0.04,1.22)
1
White
0.48% (0.01,0.95)
1
Black: 0.13% (-0.87,1.13)
1
Age: <65:0.09% (-1.09,1.27)
1
65-75:-0.46% (-1.42,0.50)
1
>75:0.80% (0.27,1.33)
1
Educational Attainment: Low (< 8
yrs): 0.07% (-1.44,1.58)
1
Medium (8-12 yrs): 0.29% (-0.32, 0.90)
1
July 2009
E-430
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
High (>12 yrs): 0.52% (-0.28,1.32)
1
Location of Death: In hospital: 0.06%
(¦0.49,0.61)
1
Out of hospital: 0.87% (0.05,1.69)
1
Season: Winter: -0.09% (-0.93, 0.75)
1
Summer: 0.67% (-0.31,1.65)
1
Transition (spring/fall): 0.51% (-0.20,
1.22)
1
Contributing causes of disease: All-
cause
Secondary pneumonia present: 0.67%
(0.16,1.18)
1-2 avg
Secondary pneumonia absent: 0.34%
(0.16, 0.52)
1-2 avg
Secondary heart failure present: 0.42%
(0.01,0.83)
1-2 avg
Secondary heart failure absent: 0.37%
(0.19, 0.55)
1-2 avg
Secondary stroke present: 0.85% (0.30,
1.40)
1-2 avg
Secondary stroke absent: 0.32% (0.14,
0.50)
1-2 avg
Diabetes present: 0.57% (0.02,1.12)
1-2 avg
Diabetes absent: 0.34% (0.14, 0.54)
1-2 avg
Respiratory
Secondary pneumonia present: 1.28%
(-0.33, 2.89)
0-3
Secondary pneumonia absent: 0.78%
(0.15,1.41)
0-3
Secondary heart failure present: 1.48%
(0.07, 2.89)
0-3
Secondary heart failure absent: 0.79%
(0.26,1.32)
July 2009
E-431
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
0-3
Secondary stroke present: 1.95% (-0.11,
4.01)
0-3
Secondary stroke absent: 0.80% (0.29,
1.31)
0-3
Diabetes present: 1.96% (-0.22, 4.14)
0-3
Diabetes absent: 0.82% (0.31,1.33)
0-3
Heart Disease
Secondary pneumonia present: 0.66%
(¦0.63,1.95)
2
Secondary pneumonia absent: 0.49%
(0.27, 0.71)
2
Secondary stroke present: 0.73% (-0.05,
1.51)
2
Secondary stroke absent: 0.48% (0.24,
0.72)
2
Diabetes present: 0.34% (-0.42,1.10)
2
Diabetes absent: 0.52% (0.28, 0.76)
2
Myocardial Infarction
Secondary pneumonia present: 1.54%
(¦1.05,4.13)
0
Secondary pneumonia absent: 0.42%
(0.05, 0.79)
0
Secondary stroke present: 0.50% (-1.38,
2.38)
0
Secondary stroke absent: 0.36% (-0.05,
0.77)
0
Diabetes present: 0.70% (-0.38,1.78)
0
Diabetes absent: 0.41% (0.04, 0.78)
0
Stroke
Secondary pneumonia present: 1.74%
(0.35, 3.13)
1
^Secondar^neumonia^
July 2009
E-432
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
(¦0.16,0.74)
1
Secondary heart failure present: 1.01%
( 0.77, 1.79)
Secondary heart failure absent: 0.38%
(¦0.05,0.81)
1
Diabetes present: 1.02% (-0.53, 2.57)
1
Diabetes absent: 0.37% (-0.08, 0.82)
1
Study
Design & Methods
'All units expressed in//g/m3 unless otherwise specified.
Table E-17. Short-term exposure - mortality - PM102.5.
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Burnett et al.
(2004, 086247)
Period of Study: 1981-
1999
Outcome: Mortality:
Pollutant: P10 2.5
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Non-accidental (< 800)
Study Design: Time-series
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): 11.4
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Location: 12 Canadian
cities
Statistical Analyses: 1. Poisson,
natural splines
2. Random effects regression
model
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant: NO2
03
1981-1999
PMio-2.5: 0.31% (-0.66,1.33)
1
Age Groups: All ages
SO?
CO
PM10
PM10.2.5+NO2: 0.65% (-0.23,1.59)
1
PM2.6
Note: PM10 measurement
calculated as the sum of PM2.6
and PM10 2.5 measurements.
Reference: Kan et al.
(2007,091267)
Period of Study: 3/2004-
1212005
Outcome (ICD10): Mortality:
Pollutant: PMio 2.5
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Total (non-accidental) (A00-R99)
Cardiovascular (100-199)
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): 56.4 (1.34)
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag: Total: 0.12% (-0.13,0.36)
Location: Shanghai, China
Respiratory (J00-J98)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
GAM, penalized splines
Age Groups: All ages
Range (Min, Max): (8.3,
235.0)
Copollutant (correlation):
PM10: r - 0.88
PM2.6: r - 0.48
0s: r - 0.07
0-1
Cardiovascular: 0.34% (-0.05, 0.73)
0-1
Respiratory: 0.40% (-0.34,1.13)
0-1
July 2009
E-433
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Kettunen et al.
(2007,091242)
Period of Study: 1998-
2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Outcome (ICD10): Mortality:
Stroke (160-161,163-164)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
GAM, penalized thin-plate splines
Age Groups: a 65
Pollutant: PMio-2.5
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Median (SD) unit: Cold
Season: 6.7
Warm Season: 8.4
Range (Min, Max): Cold
Season: (0.0,101.4)
Warm Season: (0.0, 42.0)
Copollutant: 0:i, CO, NO2
PM10
PM2.6
UFP
Increment:
Cold Season: 8.3 /yglm3
Warm Season: 5.7 /yglm3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Cold Season: -1.04% (-6.63, 4.89)
0
¦2.49% (-7.57, 2.88)
1. -4.93% (-9.99, 0.41)
2
¦4.33% (-9.32, 0.93)
3
Warm Season: 7.05% (-1.88,16.80)
0
4.38% (-4.26,13.81)
1: -1.19% (-9.45,7.84)
2
1.42% (-6.79,10.34)
3
Reference: Klemm et al.
(2004, 056585)
Outcome: Mortality:
Non-accidental (< 800)
Cardiovascular (390-459)
Location: Fulton and DeKalb Respiratory (460-519)
Period of Study: 8/1998-
712000
counties, Georgia (ARIES)
Cancer (140-239)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
GLM, natural cubic splines
Age Groups: < 65,a 65
Pollutant: PMio 2.5
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): 9.69 (3.94)
Range (Min, Max): (1.71,
25.17)
Copollutant: PM2.6
0s
NO?
CO
SO2
Acid
EC
0C
S04
Oxygenated Hydrocarbons
Nonmethane hydrocarbons
NOs
Increment: NR
PISE)
lag:
Quarterly Knots:
0.00433 (0.00333)
0-1
Monthly Knots:
0.00617 (0.00360)
0-1
Biweekly Knots:
0.00516(0.00381)
0-1
July 2009
E-434
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Perez et al.
(2008,156020)
Period of Study:
3/27/2003-12/31/2005
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Outcome: respiratory mortality
Study Design: cohort
Covariates: temperature,
humidity
Statistical Analysis:
autoregressive Poisson regression
models
Statistical Package: NR
Age Groups: All deaths
Pollutant: PM102 E
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD) Unit: 14.0 (9.5)
z^g/m3
Range (Min, Max): 0.1, 93.1
Copollutant: PM2.6-i, PMi
Increment: 10/yg/m3
Odds Ratio |95%CI)
Lag
Single Pollutant Model
Avg L0-1: 1.000 (0.944-1.060), p - 0.991
L1:1.002(0.955-1.052), p - 0.931
L2:1.070(1.023-1.118), p - 0.003
Multi-pollutant Model
Avg L0-1: 1.002 (0.937-1.071), p - 0.958
L1: 0.998 (0.943-1.056), p - 0.0.936
L2:1.033(0.980-1.089), p - 0.226
Reference: Perez et al.
(2008,156020)
Period of Study:
3/27/2003-12/31/2005
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Outcome: cardiovascular mortality Pollutant: PM102 e
Study Design: cohort Averaging Time: 24 h
Covariates: temperature,
humidity
Mean (SD) Unit: 14.0 (9.5)
Z^g/m3
Statistical Analysis: Range (Min, Max): 0.1, 93.1
autoregressive Poisson regression
mo(|e|s Copollutant: PM2.6-i, PMi
Statistical Package: NR
Age Groups: All deaths
Increment: 10/yg/m3
Odds Ratio |95%CI)
Lag
Avg L0-1: 1.054(1.019-1.089), p - 0.002
L1:1.059(1.031-1.072), p - 0.000
L2:1.044(1.017-1.072), p - 0.001
Multi-pollutant Model
Avg L0-1: 1.053 (1.013-1.094), p - 0.009
L1:1.059(1.026-1.094), p - 0.001
L2:1.044(1.012-1.078), p - 0.007
Reference: Perez et al.
(2008,156020)
Period of Study:
3/27/2003-12/31/2005
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Outcome: cerebrovascular
mortality
Study Design: cohort
Covariates: temperature,
humidity
Pollutant: PM102 E
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD) Unit: 14.0 (9.5)
/yg/m3
Range (Min, Max): 0.1, 93.1
Statistical Analysis:
autoregressive Poisson regression Copollutant: PM2.6-i, PMi
models
Statistical Package: NR
Age Groups: All deaths
Increment: 10/yg/m3
Odds Ratio |95%CI)
Lag
Avg L0-1: 1.087 (1.018-1.161), p - 0.013
L1:1.086(1.030-1.145), p - 0.002
L2:1.051 (0.997-1.108), p - 0.064
Multi-pollutant Model
Avg L0-1: 1.103 (1.022-1.191), p - 0.011
L1:1.098(1.030-1.171), p - 0.004
L2:1.076(1.010-1.146), p - 0.023
Reference: Slaughter et al.
Outcome: Mortality: Non-
Pollutant: PMio-2.5 This study does not present quantitative results for PM10-2.B.
(2005, 073854)
accidental (< 800)
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Period of Study: 1/1995-
Study Design: Time-series
Mean (SD) unit: NR
12/1999
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
Range (9th, 95th): NR
Location: Spokane,
GLM, natural splines
Washington
Age Groups: All ages
Copollutant (correlation):
PM1: r - 0.19
PM2.6: r - 0.31
PM10: r - 0.94
CO: r - 0.32
July 2009
E-435
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% ClJ
Reference: Stieb et al. Outcome: Mortality: All-cause
Pollutant: PMio 2.5
Increment: 13.0/yg/m3
(2002,025205) (non-accidental)
Averaging Time: NR
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
Period of Study: Study Design: Meta-analysis
Mean (SD): NR
lag:
Publication dates of studies:
1985-12/2000 Mortality Statistical Analyses: Random
series: 1958-1999 effects model
Range (Min, Max): NR
Single-pollutant models: 10 studies
Location: 40 cities (11 A9e Groups: All ages
Canadian cities, 19 U.S.
Copollutant: Varied between
studies: PM2.6, O3, SO2, NO2,
CO
PMio-2.5: 1.2% (0.5,1.9)
Multipollutant models: 6 studies
cities, Santiago, Amsterdam,
Erfurt, 7 Korean cities)
PMio-2.5: 0.9% (-0.3, 2.0)
July 2009
E-436
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Villeneuve et al. Outcome: Mortality:
(2003,055051)
Period of Study: 1986-
1999
Location: Vancouver,
Canada
Non-accidental (< 800)
Cardiovascular (401-440)
Respiratory (460-519)
Cancer (140-239)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson,
natural splines
Age Groups: a 65
Pollutant: PMio 2.5
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD):
Daily: 6.1
Every 6th Day
8.3
Range (Min, Max):
Daily: (0.0, 72.0)
Every 6th Day: (0.7, 35.0)
Copollutant:
PM2.6
PM10
SO?
CO
NO?
0s
Increment: 11.0/yg/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Non-accidental
1.4% (-2.5,5.4)
0-2 avg
1.0% (-1.9,4.0)
0
¦1.1% (-4.0,1.8)
1
2.0% (-1.0,5.1)
2
Cardiovascular
5.9% (-0.2,12.4)
0-2 avg
5.9% (1.1,10.8)
0
1.4% (-3.3,6.4)
1
2.2% (-2.0,6.7)
2
Respiratory
¦1.0% (-9.8, 8.8)
0-2 avg
¦1.5% (-9.4,7.1)
0
¦1.5% (-8.4,6.0)
1
0.1% (-6.4,6.9)
2
Cancer
4.4% (-3.6,13.1)
0-2 avg
3.1% (-2.9,9.4)
0
¦1.0% (-6.9, 5.3)
1
4.0% (-2.1,10.4)
2
July 2009
E-437
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Wilson et al.
(2007,157149)
Period of Study: 1995-
1997
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Outcome: Mortality:
Cardiovascular
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson
GAM, nonparametric smoothing
spline
Age Groups:
>25
Pollutant: PMio 2.5
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Excess Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Central Phoenix: 2.4% (-1.2, 6.1)
Copollutant (correlation): NR 0-5 ma
Middle Phoenix:
3.8% (0.3, 7.5)
0-5 ma
3.4% (1.0, 5.8)
1
3.0% (0.7, 5.4)
2
Outer Phoenix: 1.1
0-5 ma
[¦1.9, 5.2)
'All units expressed in/yglm3 unless otherwise specified.
July 2009
E-438
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table E-18. Short-term exposure - mortality - PM2.5 (including PM components/sources).
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Basu et al. (2008, 098716)
Outcome (ICD10): Mortality:
Pollutant: PM2.6
The study does not provide results
quantitatively.
Period of Study: 5/1999-9/2003
Non-accidental (V01-Y98)
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Location: 9 California counties
Study Design: (1) Main analysis: Case-
Mean (SE) unit:
crossover
Contra Costa: 8.6
(2) Sensitivity analysis: Time-series
Fresno: 7.6
Statistical Analyses: (1) Main analysis:
Kern: 11.3
conditional logistic regression
(2) Sensitivity analysis: Poisson GAM
Los Angeles: 19.8
Age Groups: All ages
Orange: 17.0
Riverside: 28.4
Sacramento: 8.8
San Diego: 13.4
Santa Clara: 10.8
IQR (25th, 75th):
Contra Costa: (5.8,10.1)
Fresno: (3.8, 9.8)
Kern: (8.0,13.5)
Los Angeles: (14.7, 23.3)
Orange: (11.8, 21.0)
Riverside: (17.9, 36.1)
Sacramento: (5.8,10.1)
San Diego: (10.3,15.8)
Santa Clara: (7.2,13.8)
Copollutant (correlation): PMio
r - 0.45
0s (1 hr)
r - 0.28
03 (8hr)
r - 0.22
CO
r - 0.45
NO?
r - 0.43
Reference: Dominici et al. (2007,
097361)
Period of Study: PM10: 1987-2000.
PM2.1,: 1999-2000
Outcome: Mortality:
Pollutant: PM2.6
Increment: 10 //g/m3
All-cause (non-accidental)
Cardiorespiratory
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): NR
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Location: 100 U.S. counties (NMMAPS)
Other-cause
Range (Min, Max): NR
1999-2000:
Study Design: Time-series
Copollutant (correlation): NR
All-cause: 0.29% (0.01,0.57)
Statistical Analyses: 2-stage Be
hierarchical model
Age Groups: All ages
lyesian
1
Cardiorespiratory: 0.38% (-0.07, 0.82)
1
July 2009
E-439
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Dominici et al. (2007,
099135)
Period of Study: 2000-2005
Location: 72 U.S. counties representing
69 communities
Reference: Franklin et al. (2007,
091257)
Period of Study: 1997-2002
Location: 27 U.S. communities
Outcome: Total mortality
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: 2-stage Bayesian
hierarchical model
Age Groups: All ages
Outcome: Mortality:
All-cause (non-accidental (< 800)
Cardiovascular (390-429)
Respiratory (460-519)
Stroke (430-438)
Study Design: Time-stratified case-
crossover
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PM2.6, Nickel, speciated fine
PM, and Vanadium
Averaging Time: Annual avg
Mean (SD): NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD):15.7/yglm3
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation): NR
The study does not provide results
quantitatively.
Note: The study investigated whether
county-specific short-term effects of
PMio on mortality are modified by long-
term county-specific nickel or vanadium
PM2.6 concentrations.
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag: All-cause (non-accidental): 0.67%
(-0.12,1.46)
0
1.21% (0.29, 2.14)
10.82% (0.02,1.63)
0-1
Respiratory: 1.31% (-0.10, 2.73)
0
1.78% (0.20, 3.36)
1
1.67% (0.19, 3.16)
0-1
Cardiovascular: 0.34% (-0.61,1.28)
0
0.94% (-0.14,2.02)
1.
0.54% (-0.47,1.54)
0-1
Stroke: 0.62% (-0.69,1.94)
0
1.03% (0.02, 2.04)
1.
0.67% (-0.23,1.57)
0-1
Age> 75: All cause: 1.66% (0.62, 2.70)
1
Respiratory: 1.85% (0.27, 3.44)
1
Cardiovascular: 1.29% (0.15,2.42)
1
Stroke: 1.52% (0.37, 2.67)
1
Age <75: All cause: 0.62% (-0.30,1.55)
1
Respiratory: 1.53% (-0.67,3.74)
1
Cardiovascular: 0.26% (-1.04,1.56)
1
July 2009
E-440
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Stroke:-0.78% (-2.32, 0.76)
1
Male: All cause: 1.06% (0.07,2.06)
1
Respiratory: 1.90% (0.14, 3.65)
1
Cardiovascular: 0.52% (-0.63,1.66)
1
Stroke: 0.79% (-0.42, 2.02)
1
Female: All cause: 1.34% (0.40, 2.27)
1
Respiratory: 1.57% (-0.22,3.35)
1
Cardiovascular: 1.30% (0.14,2.46)
1
Stroke: 0.79% (-0.51,2.09)
1
East: All cause: 1.95% (0.50, 3.40)
1
Respiratory: 2.66% (0.33, 5.00)
1
Cardiovascular: 1.52% (0.06,2.98)
1
Stroke: 1.16% (-0.40, 2.73)
1
West: All cause: 0.05% (-1.80,1.89)
1
Respiratory: 0.67% (-2.00, 3.34)
1|
Cardiovascular: 0.11% (-2.03,2.24)
1|
Stroke: 0.94% (-0.38, 2.26)
1
PM2.6 > 15 /yg/m3: All cause: 1.10%
(-0.43, 2.64)
1
Respiratory: 1.42% (-0.84, 3.68)
1
Cardiovascular: 0.88% (-0.87, 2.62)
1
Stroke: 0.91% (-0.28, 2.10)
1
PM2.bd 15/yg/m3: All cause: 1.41 %
(-0.49, 3.30)
1
July 2009
E-441
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Respiratory: 2.46% (-0.49, 5.42)
1
Cardiovascular: 1.09% (-1.15,3.32)
1
Stroke: 1.36% (-0.56, 3.27)
1
Effect of A/C at percentile of air
conditioning prevalence: 25th percentile
(45% prevalence of A/C): All cause:
1.50% (0.13, 2.88)
1
Respiratory: 2.27% (0.27, 4.27)
1
Cardiovascular: 1.04% (-0.54,2.63)
1
Stroke: 1.04% (-0.44, 2.53)
1
75th percentile (80% prevalence of A/C):
All cause: 0.85% (-0.64, 2.35)
1
Respiratory: 1.04% (-1.29,3.37)
1
Cardiovascular: 0.81% (-0.93, 2.61)
1
Stroke: 1.03% (-0.76, 2.83)
1
Effect of A/C at percentile of air
conditioning prevalence in cities with
summer peaking PM2.6 concentrations:
25th percentile (45% prevalence of A/C):
All cause: 1.01% (-0.30, 2.32)
1
Respiratory: 0.76% (-1.38, 2.90)
1
Cardiovascular: 0.43% (-0.86,1.72)
1
Stroke:-0.18% (-2.08,1.73)
1
75th percentile (77% prevalence of A/C):
All cause:-0.55% (-1.95,0.85)
1
Respiratory: -2.08% (-4.47, 0.31)
1
Cardiovascular: -1.02% (-2.44, 0.41)
1
Stroke: 0.69% (-1.19, 2.57)
1
July 2009
E-442
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Franklin et al. (2008,
097426)
Period of Study: 2000-2005
Location: 25 U.S. communities
Outcome (ICD10): Mortality:
Non-accidental (V01-Y98)
Respiratory (J00-J99)
Cardiovascular (101152)
Stroke (I60-J69)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: 1st stage:
Poisson, cubic spline
2nd stage: Random effects meta-analysis
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Range Mean (SD):
Winter: 9.6 to 34.4
Spring: 6.7 to 27.6
summer: 7.6 to 26.0
Fall: 9.5 to 32.1
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant:
Al, As, Br, Cr, EC, Fe, K, Mn, Na+, Ni,
NOs-, NH4, 0C, Pb, Si, S042-, V, Zn
July 2009
E-443
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Non-accidental: 0.74% (0.41,1.07)
0-1
Cardiovascular: 0.47% (0.02, 0.92)
0-1
Respiratory: 1.01% (-0.03,2.05)
1-2
Stroke: 0.68% (-0.21,1.57)
0-1
Winter: 0.15% (-0.42, 0.72)
0-1
Spring: 1.88% (1.29, 2.48)
0-1
Summer: 0.99% (0.35,1.68)
0-1
Fall: 0.19% (-0.25, 0.64)
0-1
West: 0.51% (0.10, 0.92)
0-1
East & Central: 0.92% (0.44,1.39)
0-1
% Increase per 10//g/m3 increase in
PM2.E for an IQR increase in species to
PM2.E mass proportion
Univariate analysis
Al: 0.58%
As: 0.55%
Br: 0.38
Cr: 0.33%
EC: 0.06%
Fe: 0.12%
K: 0.41%
Mn: 0.14%
Na+: 0.20%
Ni: 0.37%
NOs-: -0.49%
NFk 0.04%
0C:-0.02%
Pb: 0.17%
Si: 0.41%
SO42-: 0.51 %
V: 0.30%
Zn: 0.23%
Multivariate (1)
Al: 0.79%
Ni: 0.34%
S0|fRAH53tD0 NOT CITE OR QUOTE
Multivariate (2)
Al: 0.61%
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Holloman et al. (2004,
087375)
Period of Study: 1999-2001
Location: 7 North Carolina counties
Outcome (ICD10): Mortality:
Cardiovascular (I00-I99)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: 3-stage E
hierarchical model
Age Groups: >16
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): NR
esian Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
2.5% (-3.9 to 9.6)
0
4.0% (-3.3 to 12.2)
1
11.4% (2.8 to 19.8)
2
¦1.1% (-7.5 to 5.2)
3
Reference: Hopke et al. (2006, 088390)
Outcome: Mortality:
Pollutant: Source-apportioned PM2.6:
The study does not present quantitative
results.
Period of Study: Washington, DC:
Total (non-accidental)
Washington, DC: Soil
8/1988-12/1997. Phoenix, Arizona:
3/1995-6/1998
Cardiovascular
Traffic
Location: Washington, DC and
Cardiovascular-Respiratory
Secondary Sulfate
surrounding counties
Study Design: Source-apportionment
Nitrate
Phoenix, Arizona
Statistical Analyses: Receptor modeling
Residual Oil
Age Groups: All ages
Wood Smoke
Sea Salt
Incinerator
Primary Coal
Phoenix, Arizona: Crustal
Traffic
Vegetation and Wood Burning
Secondary Sulfate
Metals
Sea Salt
Primary Coal
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation): NR
July 2009
E-444
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ito et al. (2006, 088391)
Period of Study: 811988-1211997
Location: Washington, DC and
surrounding counties
Outcome: Mortality:
Total (non-accidental)
Cardiovascular
Cardiovascular-Respiratory
Study Design: Time-series
Source-apportionment
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GLM,
natural splines
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: Source-apportioned PM2.6:
Soil
Traffic
Secondary Sulfate
Nitrate
Residual Oil
Wood Smoke
Sea Salt
Incinerator
Primary Coal
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD):
17.8(8.7)
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Increment: PM2.6 - 28.7 /yglm3
PM2.6 Sources 5-95th - Not reported
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Secondary sulfate (variance-weighted
mean percent excess mortality)
6.7% (1.7,11.7)
3
Primary coal-related PM2.6 (mean percent
excess mortality)
5.0% (1.0,9.1)
3
Residual oil (mean percent excess
mortality)
2.7% (-1.1, 6.5)
2
Traffic-related PM2.6 (mean percent
excess mortality)
2.6% (-1.6, 6.9)
NR
Soil-related PM2.6 (mean percent excess
mortality)
2.1% (-0.8, 4.9)
PM2.5 Sensitivity analysis:
2 df/year: 7.9% (3.3,12.6)
3
4 df/year: 8.3% (3.7,13.1)
3
8 df/year: 8.3% (3.7,13.2)
3
16 df/year: 8.1% (3.1,13.2)
3
Reference: Kan et al. (2007, 091267)
Period of Study: 312004-1212005
Location: Shanghai, China
Outcome (ICD10): Mortality:
Total (non-accidental) (A00-R99)
Cardiovascular (I00-I99)
Respiratory (J00-J98)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM,
penalized splines
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): 52.3(1.57)
Range (Min, Max): (2.0, 330.3)
Copollutant (correlation):
PM10: r - 0.84
PM 10-2.5: r - 0.48
O3: r - 0.31
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Total: 0.36% (0.11,0.61)
0-1
Cardiovascular: 0.41% (0.01, 0.82)
0-1
Respiratory: 0.95% (0.16,1.73)
0-1
July 2009
E-445
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Kettunen et al. (2007,
091242)
Period of Study: 1998-2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Outcome (ICD10): Mortality:
Pollutant: PM2.6
Increment:
Stroke (160-161,163-164)
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Cold Season: 6.7 /yglm3
Study Design: Time-series
Median (SD) unit:
Warm Season: 5.7 /yglm3
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM,
penalized thin-plate splines
Age Groups: a 65
Cold Season: 8.2
Warm Season: 7.8
Range (Min, Max):
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Cold Season
Cold Season: (1.1, 69.5)
¦0.19% (-3.77, 3.51)
Warm Season: (1.1,41.5)
0
Copollutant: 0:i
¦0.17% (-3.73, 3.52)
CO
1
NO?
0.59% (-2.95, 4.26)
PMio
2
PMio-2.5
0.46% (-3.10, 4.15)
UFP
3
Warm Season
6.86% (0.37,13.78)
0
7.40% (1.33,13.84)
1
4.01% (-1.79,10.14)
2
¦1.72% (-7.38, 4.29)
3
Period of Study: 8/1998-7/2000
Location: Fulton and DeKalb counties,
Georgia (ARIES)
Outcome: Mortality:
Pollutant: PM2.6
Increment: NR
Non-accidental (< 800)
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
PISE)
Cardiovascular (390-459)
Mean (SD):
lag:
Respiratory (460-519)
19.62 (8.32)
Quarterly Knots:
Cancer (140-239)
Range (Min, Max):
PM2.b: 0.00398 (0.00161)
Study Design: Time-series
(5.29,48.01)
0-1
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GLM,
Copollutant:
Monthly Knots:
natural cubic splines
PM 10-2.6
PM2 b: 0.00544 (0.00184)
Age Groups: < 65
0s
0-1
>65
NO?
Biweekly Knots:
CO
PM2.b: 0.00369 (0.00201)
SO?
0-1
Acid
EC
OC
S04
Oxygenated Hydrocarbons
Nonmethane hydrocarbons
NOs
July 2009
E-446
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Lippmann et al. (2006,
Outcome: Mortality:
Pollutant: Speciated Fine PM:
The study does not present quantitative
091165)
results.
Non-accidental (< 800)
Al, Ar, Cr, Cu, EC, Fe, Mn, Ni, Nitrate,
Period of Study: 2000-2003
0C, Pb, Se, Si, Sulfate, V, Zn
Study Design: Time-series
Location: 60 U.S. cities (NMMAPS)
Averaging Time: Annual avg
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GLM
Mean (SD): R
Age Groups: All ages
Range (Min, Max): NR
Reference: Maret al. (2005, 087566)
Period of Study: 1995-1997
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Outcome: Mortality:
Non-accidental (< 800)
Cardiovascular (390-448)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GLM
Age Groups: a 65
Pollutant: Source-apportioned PM2.6:
Soil
Traffic
Secondary Sulfate
Nitrate
Residual Oil
Wood Smoke
Sea Salt
Incinerator
Primary Coal
Increment: PM2.6 Sources 5-95th - NR
% Increase (median percent excess
risk)
lag:
Secondary sulfate: 16.0%
0
Traffic: 13.2%
1
Copper (Cu) smelter: 12.0%
0
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Sea salt: 10.2%
Mean (SD): NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
5
Biomassfwood combustion: 8.6%
3
Outcome (ICD10): Mortality:
Pollutant: PM2.6
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Total mortality (respiratory,
cardiovascular, ischemic heart disease,
diabetes)
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD):
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Respiratory (J00-J98)
Contra Costa: 14
Penalized splines
Cardiovascular (I00-I99)
Fresno: 23
All ages:
Ischemic heart disease (I20-I25)
Kern: 22
All-cause:
Diabetes (E10-E14)
Los Angeles: 21
0.2% (-0.2, 0.7)
Study Design: Time-series
Orange: 21
2
Statistical Analyses: Poisson, natural
splines and penalized splines
Riverside: 29
Sacramento: 14
0.6% (0.2,1.0)
0-1
Age Groups: All ages
Santa Clara: 15
Cardiovascular:
>65
San Diego: 16
0.3% (-0.1, 0.7)
Range (Min, Max):
2
Contra Costa: (1, 77)
0.6% (0.0,1.1)
Fresno: (1,160)
0-1
Kern: (1,155)
Respiratory:
Los Angeles: (4, 85)
1.3% (0.1,2.6)
Orange: (4,114)
2
Riverside: (2,120)
2.2% (0.6,3.9)
Sacramento: (1,108)
0-1
Santa Clara: (2, 74)
>65:
San Diego: (0, 66)
All-cause:
Copollutant (correlation):
0.2% (-0.2, 0.7)
NO?
2
r - 0.56
0.7% (0.2,1.1)
Reference: Ostro et al. (2006, 087991)
Period of Study: 111999-1212002
Location: 9 California counties
(CALFINE)
July 2009
E-447
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
CO
0-1
r - 0.60
Ischemic heart disease: 0.3% (-0.5,1.0)
Os (1h)
0-1
r - -0.14
Males: 0.5% (-0.2,1.2)
Os (8h|
0-1
r - 0.22
Females: 0.8% (0.3,1.3)
0-1
Whites: 0.8% (0.2,1.3)
0-1
Blacks: 0.1% (-0.9,1.2)
0-1
Hispanics: 0.8% (-0.1,1.6)
0-1
In hospital: 0.6% (-0.1,1.3)
0-1
Out of hospital: 0.6% (0.1,1.1)
0-1
High school graduates: 0.4% (0.0, 0.8)
0-1
Non-high school graduates: 0.9% (-0.1,
1.9)
0-1
Natural splines
All cause
4 df: 0.5% (-0.1,1.1)
0-1
8 df: 0.4% (-0.1,0.9)
0-1
12 df: 0.3% (-0.1,0.7)
0-1
Cardiovascular
4 df: 0.4% (-0.2, 0.9)
0-1
8 df: 0.1% (-0.5, 0.6)
0-1
12 df: 0.0% (-0.6, 0.6)
0-1
Respiratory
4 df: 2.1% (0.2, 4.1)
0-1
8 df: 1.6% (-0.5, 3.6)
0-1
12 df: 1.3% (-0.3, 2.9)
0-1
>65
July 2009
E-448
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
All cause
4 df: 0.7% (0.0,1.3)
0-1
8 df: 0.4% (-0.1,0.9)
0-1
12 df: 0.3% (-0.1,0.8)
0-1
Reference: Ostro et al. (2007, 091354)
Period of Study: PM2.6 speciation
analysis: 1/2000-12/2003. PM2.1,
analysis: 1/1999-12/2003
Location: 6 California counties (2000-
2003). 9 California counties (1999-
2003) (CALFINE)
Outcome (ICD10): Mortality:
Total (non-accidental) mortality
Respiratory (J00-J98)
Cardiovascular (I00-I99)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson, natural
splines
Age Groups: >65
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD):
2000-2003: 19.28
1999-2003: 18.6
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation):
EC: r - 0.53
0C: r - 0.62
NOs: r - 0.65
S(k r - 0.32
Al: r - 0.02
Br: r - 0.54
Ca:r - 0.23
CI: r - 0.15
Cu:r - 0.23
Fe: r - 0.38
K: r - 0.52
Mn: r - 0.21
Ni: r - 0.11
Pb: r - 0.27
S: r - 0.35
Si: r - 0.16
Ti: r - 0.24
V: r - 0.20
Zn: r - 0.51
Increment: 14.6 /yglm3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Cardiovascular
1.6% (0.0,3.1)
3
Notes: The study does not present all
estimates quantitatively.
July 2009
E-449
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ostro et al. (2008, 097971) Outcome (ICD10): Mortality:
Period of Study: 112000-1212003
Location: 6 California counties
Cardiovascular (100199)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson, natural
cubic splines and natural splines
Age Groups:
Pollutant: PM2.6, EC, 0C, NO3, SO4, Ca,
CI, Cu, Fe, K, S, Si, Ti, Zn
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): PMz.b: 19.28
EC: 0.966
0C: 7.129
NO3: 5.415
S(k 1.908
Ca: 0.080
CI: 0.094
Cu: 0.007
Fe: 0.124
K: 0.117
S: 0.648
Si: 0.168
Ti: 0.009
Zn: 0.012
Range (95th): PM21,: 46.91
EC: 2.57
0C: 15.91
NOs: 17.46
S(k 5.18
Ca: 0.20
CI: 0.41
Cu: 0.02
Fe: 0.34
K: 0.26
S: 1.70
Si: 0.43
Ti: 0.02
Zn: 0.04
The study does not present quantitative
results.
Reference: Perez et al. (2008,156020) Outcome: respiratory mortality
Study Design: cohort
Period of Study: 3/27/2003-
1213112005
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Covariates: temperature, humidity
Statistical Analysis: autoregressive
Poisson regression models
Statistical Package: NR
Age Groups: All deaths
Pollutant: PM2.6-i
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD) Unit: 5.5 (3.8)//gfm3
Range (Min, Max): 0.6, 45.5
Copollutant: PMwj,, PMi
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Odds Ratio |95%CI)
Lag
Avg L0-1: 0.998 (0.849-1.174), p -
0.981
L1: 1.014 (0.886-1.161), p - 0.838
L2: 1.295 (1.141-1.470), p - 0.000
Multi-pollutant Model
Avg L0-1: 0.987 (0.806-1.208), p -
0.898
L1: 1.022 (0.859-1.214), p - 0.
L2: 1.206 (1.028-1.416), p - 0.022
July 2009
E-450
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Perez et al. (2008,156020)
Outcome: cardiovascular mortality
Pollutant: PM2.6-i
Increment: 10/yg/m3
Period of Study: 3/27/2003-
1213112005
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Study Design: cohort
Averaging Time: 24 h
Odds Ratio |95%CI)
Covariates: temperature, humidity
Statistical Analysis: autoregressive
Poisson regression models
Statistical Package: NR
Age Groups: All deaths
Mean (SD) Unit: 5.5 (3.8)/yg/m3
Range (Min, Max): 0.6, 45.5
Copollutant: PMwj,, PMi
Lag
Avg L0-1:1.100 (1.002-1.207), p -
0.046
L1: 1.112(1.031-1.200),p - 0.006
L2: 1.078 (0.999-1.163), p - 0.052
Multi-pollutant Model
Avg L0-1: 0.994 (0.885-1.116), p -
0.920
L1: 0.984 (0.892-1.086), p - 0.754
L2: 0.981 (0.891-1.079), p - 0.688
Reference: Perez et al. (2008,156020)
Outcome: cerebrovascular mortality
Pollutant: PM2.6-i
Increment: 10/yg/m3
Period of Study: 3/27/2003-
12/31/2005
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Study Design: cohort
Averaging Time: 24 h
Odds Ratio |95%CI)
Covariates: temperature, humidity
Statistical Analysis: autoregressive
Poisson regression models
Statistical Package: NR
Age Groups: All deaths
Mean (SD) Unit: 5.5 (3.8)/yg/m3
Range (Min, Max): 0.6, 45.5
Copollutant: PM102 E, PMi
Lag
Avg L0-1:1.083 (0.897-1.307), p -
0.406
L1: 1.121 (0.964-1.303), p - 0.140
L2: 0.984 (0.841-1.152), p - 0.839
Multi-pollutant Model
Avg L0-1: 0.899 (0.712-1.135), p -
0.371
L1: 0.905 (0.743-1.102), p - 0.321
L2: 0.868 (0.711-1.060), p - 0.165
Reference: Rainham et al. (2005,
088676)
Period of Study: 1981-1999
Location: Toronto, Canada
Outcome: Mortality:
Pollutant: PM2.6
Increment: NR
Total (non-accidental) (< 800)
Cardiorespiratory (390-459
480-519)
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD):
All years: 17.0 (8.7)
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Winter and Winter Synoptic Events
Other-causes
Winters (Dec-Feb): 17.2 (6.8)
Winter
Study Design: Time-series
Summers (June-Aug): 18.8 (10.2)
Total: 0.998% (0.997,1.000)
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GLM,
natural splines
Age Groups: All ages
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant:
CO
NO2
SO2
0s
2
Cardiorespiratory: 0.998 (0.996,1.000)
2
Other: 0.998% (0.996,1.000)
2
Dry Moderate
Total: 1.001% (0.996,1.007)
1
Cardiorespiratory: 1.005(0.998,1.011)
Other: 0.997% (0.989,1.006)
0
Dry Polar
Total: 0.998% (0.995,1.001)
Cardiorespiratory: 0.995 (0.991, 0.999)
2
July 2009
E-451
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Other: 1.002% (0.998,1.005)
1
Moist Moderate
Total: 0.998% (0.993,1.002)
2
Cardiorespiratory: 1.003(0.995,1.010)
1
Other: 0.997% (0.991,1.004)
1
Moist Polar
Total: 1.001% (0.998,1.005)
1
Cardiorespiratory: 1.002(0.997,1.007)
2
Other: 1.003% (0.999,1.007)
0
Moist Tropical
Total: 1.007% (0.965,1.203)
0
Cardiorespiratory: 1.123 (1.031,1.224)
2
Other: 1.248% (1.123,1.387)
0
Transition
Total: 1.003% (0.996,1.009)
1
Cardiorespiratory: 0.996 (0.987,1.004)
0
Other: 0.997% (0.990,1.004)
0
summer and summer Synoptic Events
summer
Total: 1.000% (1.000,1.001)
0
Cardiorespiratory: 1.001 (1.000,1.002)
0
Other: 1.001% (1.000,1.002)
0
Dry Moderate
Total: 1.001% (0.999,1.002)
2
Cardiorespiratory: 1.002(0.999,1.004)
2
Other: 0.999% (0.997,1.002)
0
July 2009
E-452
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Dry Polar
Total: 1.002% (0.999,1.005)
2
Cardiorespiratory: 0.996 (0.991,1.000)
0
Other: 1.003% (0.999,1.007)
2
Dry Tropical
Total: 1.016% (1.006,1.027)
0
Cardiorespiratory: 1.017 (1.005,1.030)
2
Other: 1.017% (1.003,1.031)
0
Moist Moderate
Total: 1.002% (1.000,1.004)
2
Cardiorespiratory: 1.003(0.999,1.006)
2
Other: 1.004% (1.001,1.006)
0
Moist Polar
Total: 1.005% (0.998,1.011)
1
Cardiorespiratory: 1.008(0.997,1.018)
0
Other: 1.003% (0.995,1.011)
1
Moist Tropical
Total: 0.999% (0.997,1.001)
2
Cardiorespiratory: 0.996 (0.993,1.000)
2
Other: 0.998% (0.995,1.001)
1
Transition
Total: 1.005% (0.996,1.014)
1
Cardiorespiratory: 1.007 (0.994,1.020)
1
Other: 1.002% (0.996,1.008)
2
July 2009
E-453
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Rosenthal et al. (2008,
156925)
Period of Study: 712002-71 2006
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
Outcome: Non-Dead on Arrival (D0A)
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests (0HCA)
Witnessed non-DOA OHCA
Study Design: Case-crossover
Statistical Analyses: Time-stratified
conditional logistic regression
Age Groups: All ages
Study Population: Non-DOA OHCA: 1,374
Witnessed non-DOA OHCA: 511
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Hourly
Mean (SD):
NR
IQR (25th, 75th):
All non-DOA
All heart rhythms: (9.4,19.5)
OHCA: (9.6,19.5)
Referents: (9.3,19.5)
Asystole: (9.2,19.4)
OHCA: (9.2,19.7)
Asystole: (9.2,19.2)
Witnessed non-DOA hourly
All heart rhythms: (8.8, 20.7)
OHCA: (8.8,21.9)
Referents: (8.8, 20.4)
Asystole: (8.5,19.8)
OHCA: (9.4,21.3)
Referents: (8.3,19.1)
Copollutant (correlation): NR
July 2009
E-454
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Hazard Ratio (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Out-of-Hospital non-DOA Cardiac Arrests
All
1.02(0.94,1.11)
0
1.00(0.92,1.08)
1
0.98(0.90,1.06)
2
1.00(0.92,1.08)
3
1.02(0.92,1.12)
0-1 avg
1.01 (0.91,1.12)
0-2 avg
1.02(0.91,1.14)
0-3 avg
Asystole
1.03(0.91,1.17)
0
1.00(0.89,1.13)
1
1.01 (0.90,1.13)
2
0.98(0.87,1.10)
3
1.03(0.90,1.18)
0-1 avg
1.05(0.90,1.22)
0-2 avg
1.04 (0.88,1.22)
0-3 avg
Vfib
1.08(0.92,1.28)
0
1.02(0.87,1.21)
1
0.96(0.80,1.14)
2
1.10(0.93,1.31)
3
1.06(0.88,1.28)
0-1 avg
1.01 (0.82,1.25)
0-2 avg
1tM#-1f$N0T CITE OR QUOTE
0-3 avg
PEA
0 9210 77.1 08)
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Schwartz et al. (2002,
025312)
Period of Study: 1979-Late 1980's
Location: 6 U.S. cities
Outcome: Mortality:
Total (non-accidental) (< 800)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Hierarchical
modeling:
1. Poisson GAM, LOESS
2. Multivariate modeling
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PM2.6, PM2.6 sources (Traffic,
Coal, Residual Oil)
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD):
PM2.6 Range: (Madison: 11.3 to
Steubenville: 30.5]
Traffic Range: (Steubenville: 1.5 to
Boston: 4.8)
Coal Range: (Madison: 4.9 to
Steubenville: 19.2)
Residual Oil Range: (Boston: 0.5 to
Steubenville: 0.9)
Range (Min, Max): NR
The study does not present quantitative
results.
Reference: Simpson et al. (2005,
087438)
Period of Study: 1/1996-12/1999
Location: 4 Australian cities
Outcome: Mortality:
Non-accidental (< 800)
Cardiovascular (390-459)
Respiratory (460-519)
Study Design: Time-series
meta-analysis
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM,
natural splines
Poisson GLM, natural splines
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD):
Brisbane: PM2.6: 7.50
Sydney: PM2.6: 9.00
Melbourne: PM2.6: 9.30
Perth: PM2.6: 9.0//g/m3
Range (Min, Max):
Brisbane: PM2.6: (1.9,19.7)
Sydney: PM2.6: (2.4, 35.3)
Melbourne: PM2.6: (2.7, 35.1)
Perth: PM2.1,: (2.8, 37.3)
Copollutant: CO, NO2
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
PM2.6
0.9% (-0.7, 2.5)
Reference: Slaughter et al. (2005,
073854)
Period of Study: 1/1995-12/1999
Location: Spokane, Washington
Outcome: Mortality:
Non-accidental (< 800)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GLM,
natural splines
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): NR
Range (9th, 95th):
PM2.6: (4.2, 20.2)
Copollutant (correlation):
PM2.6: r - 0.95
PM10: r - 0.62
PMio-2.5: r - 0.31
CO: r - 0.62
Increment:
PM2.6:10 //g/m3
PM10: 25 //g/m3
Relative Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
PM2.6
(0.97,1.04)
1
0.99(0.96,1.03)
2
1.00(0.97,1.03)
3
July 2009
E-455
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Stieb et al. (2002, 025205)
Period of Study: Publication dates of
studies: 1985-12/2000 Mortality series:
1958-1999
Location: 40 cities (11 Canadian cities,
19 U.S. cities, Santiago, Amsterdam,
Erfurt, 7 Korean cities)
Outcome: Mortality:
All-cause (non-accidental)
Study Design: Meta-analysis
Statistical Analyses: Random effects
model
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: NR
Mean (SD): NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant: Varied between studies:
0s
SO?
NO?
CO
Increment:
PM2.6:18.3/yg/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Single-pollutant models
18 studies
PM2.6: 2.0% (1.2, 2.7)
Multipollutant models
8 studies
PMz.b: 1.3% (0.6,1.9)
Reference: Sullivan et al. (2003,
043156)
Period of Study: 1985-1994
Location: Western Washington
Outcome: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Pollutant: PM2.6
Study Design: Case-crossover
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Age Groups: 19-79
Study Population: Out-of-hospital cardiac
arrests: 1,206
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Median (SD) unit:
PM10
Lag 0: 28.05
Lag 1:27.97
Lag 2: 28.40
Range (Min, Max):
PM10: (7.38,89.83)
Copollutant (correlation): SO2, CO
Notes: Study used nephelometry to
measure particles and equated the
measurements to PM2.6 concentrations.
Increment:
PM10: 16.51 /yglm3
PM2.6:13.8/yg/m3
Odds Ratio (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Overall
PM10
1.05(0.87,1.27)
0
0.91 (0.75,1.11)
1
1.03(0.82,1.28)
2
PM2.6
0.94 (0.88,1.01)
0.94 (0.88,1.02)
1
1.00(0.93,1.08)
2
PM2.6: Stratified by subject
characteristics
~ 55
0.95(0.76,1.18)
0
0.89(0.71,1.12)
1
0.95(0.75,1.20)
2
>55
0.94 (0.88,1.02)
0
0.95, (0.88,1.03)
1
1.01 (0.93,1.10)
2
July 2009
E-456
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Male
0.95(0.87,1.03)
0
0.96(0.88,1.04)
1
1.01 (0.93,1.10)
2
Female
0.93(0.82,1.06)
0
0.92(0.80,1.07)
1
0.98(0.83,1.15)
2
White
0.93(0.86,1.01)
0
0.95(0.88,1.03)
1
1.03(0.95,1.12)
2
Non-White
1.09(0.88,1.36)
0
0.96(0.75,1.22)
1
0.88(0.68,1.14)
2
Current Smoker
1.05(0.92,1.19)
0
0.98(0.86,1.12)
1
1.06(0.92,1.22)
2
Nonsmoker
0.93(0.85,1.01)
0
0.93(0.85,1.02)
1
0.97 (0.89,1.07)
2
Drinker
1.13(0.92,1.39)
0
July 2009
E-457
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
1.15(0.94,1.41)
1
1.16(0.92,1.45)
2
Nondrinker
0.94 (0.86,1.03)
0
0.93(0.85,1.02)
1
1.00(0.92,1.10)
2
Activity Level-Unrestricted
0.96(0.89,1.03)
0
0.96(0.89,1.04)
1
1.01 (0.93,1.10)
2
Activity Level-Limited
0.82(0.56,1.20)
0
0.70(0.45,1.09)
1
0.97 (0.65,1.43)
2
PM2.e: Stratified by disease state
Heart disease
0.95(0.87,1.04)
0
0.97 (0.89,1.07)
1
1.06(0.96,1.16)
2
Ischemic Heart Disease
0.91 (0.80,1.04)
0
0.97 (0.84,1.11)
1
1.09(0.95,1.26)
2
Active Angina
0.98(0.81,1.20)
0
1.07 (0.88,1.31)
1
July 2009
E-458
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
1.08(0.89,1.32)
2
Congestive Heart Failure
0.91 (0.80,1.03)
0
0.99(0.87,1.13)
1
1.11 (0.97,1.26)
2
Supraventricular tachycardia
1.41 (0.97,2.04)
0
1.55(1.07,2.25)
1
1.23(0.84,1.82)
2
Bradycardia
0.97 (0.64,1.46)
0
1.29(0.85,1.96)
1
1.30(0.84,2.01)
2
Asthma
(0.80,1.27)
0
0.92(0.71,1.19)
1
0.93(0.71,1.22)
2
COPD
1.00(0.86,1.17)
1.04 (0.88,1.23)
1
1.08(0.92,1.28)
2
PM2.6: Persons with prior recognized
heart disease stratified by smoking status
All heart disease
Current smoker
1.08(0.92,1.26)
0
1.06(0.89,1.26)
1
1.29(1.06,1.55)
July 2009
E-459
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
2
Nonsmoker
0.91 (0.82,1.02)
0
0.94 (0.84,1.05)
1
0.99(0.88,1.11)
2
Ischemic Heart Disease
Current smoker
1.06(0.84,1.34)
0
0.99(0.75,1.30)
1
1.39(1.04,1.86)
2
Nonsmoker
0.86(0.73,1.02)
0
0.93(0.78,1.11)
1
0.99(0.83,1.18)
2
Active Angina
Current smoker
1.28(0.88,1.86)
0
1.26(0.79,2.01)
1
1.57 (0.99,2.48)
2
Nonsmoker
0.87 (0.68,1.12)
0
0.93(0.72,1.21)
1
0.91 (0.70,1.17)
2
Congestive Heart Failure
Current smoker
1.00(0.79,1.28)
0
1.03(0.78,1.35)
1
1.46 (1.10,1.96)
July 2009
E-460
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
2
Nonsmoker
0.88(0.76,1.03)
0
0.96(0.82,1.12)
1
0.99(0.84,1.17)
2
Supraventricular tachycardia
Current smoker
12.80 (1.05,156.57)
0
2.56 (0.82, 7.99)
1
1.15(0.46,2.86)
2
Nonsmoker
1.19(0.74,1.90)
0
1.35(0.87,2.10)
1
1.15(0.73,1.82)
2
Bradycardia
Nonsmoker
0.84 (0.14,4.95)
0
0.42 (0.03, 5.34)
1
0.51 (0.05, 5.79)
2
Nonsmoker
0.99(0.63,1.55)
0
1.42 (0.90,2.24)
1
1.39(0.88,2.20)
2
Reference: Thurston et al. (2005,
Outcome: Mortality:
Pollutant: PM2.6, and source
apportioned Increment: 10/yg/m3
097949)
PM2.b:
Total (non-accidental) (< 800)
% Increase:
Period of Study: Washington, DC:
Crustal
8/1988-12/1997. Phoenix, Arizona:
Cardiovascular (390-448)
Total (non-accidental):
1995-1997
Traffic
Study Design: Time-series
Secondary sulfate:
Location: Washington, DC and
surrounding counties
Source-apportionment
Secondary S04
Secondary NO3
Wood
Phoenix: 5.2%
Phoenix, Arizona
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GLM,
natural splines
Washington, DC: 3.8%
Motor vehicles:
July 2009
E-461
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Age Groups: Washington, DC: All ages
Phoenix, Arizona: a 65
Oil
Salt
Incinerator
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Median (SD) unit: NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant: PM2.6 species (Na, Mg, Al,
Si, P, S, CI, K,Ca, Sc, Ti, V,Cr, Mn, Fe,
Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ga, Ge, As, Se, Br, Rb, Sr,
Y, Zr, Mo, Rh, Pd, Ag, Cd, Sn, Sb, Te, I,
Cs, Ba, La, W, Au, Hg, Pb, OC, EC)
Phoenix: 0.9%
Washington, DC: 4.2%
Reference: Villeneuve et al. (2003,
055051)
Period of Study: 1986-1999
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Outcome: Mortality:
Non-accidental (< 800)
Cardiovascular (401-440)
Respiratory (460-519)
Cancer (140-239)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson, natural
splines
Age Groups: a 65
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD):
Daily
PM2.b: 7.9
Every 6th Day
PM2.b: 11.6
Range (Min, Max):
Daily
PM2.b: (2.0, 32.0)
Every 6th Day
PM2.6: (1.8, 43.0)
Copollutant:
SO2
CO
NO2
0s
Increment:
PM2.6 (Daily): 9.0/yg/m3
PM2.6 (6th Day): 15.7 /yglm3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Non-accidental
PM2.6 (Daily)
¦0.1% (-5.1, 5.2)
0-2 avg
¦0.1% (-4.1,4.1)
0
¦0.3% (-4.2, 3.7)
1
0.5% (-3.3, 4.4)
2
PM2.6 (6th Day)
¦2.8% (-7.5, 2.1)
0
2.0% (-2.6, 7.0)
1
4.5% (-0.3, 9.5)
2
Cardiovascular
PM2.6 (Daily)
1.5% (-6.1, 9.7)
0-2 avg
4.3% (-1.7,10.7)
0
¦1.0% (-7.0, 5.4)
1
¦0.5% (-6.5, 5.9)
2
PM2.6 (6th Day)
¦1.5% (-8.9, 6.5)
0
¦2.0% (-9.3, 5.8)
July 2009
E-462
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
1
3.0% (-4.2,10.8)
2
Respiratory
PM2.6 (Daily)
¦0.7% (-13.1,13.4)
0-2 avg
6.7% (-3.7,18.3)
0
¦3.0% (-12.8,7.9)
1
¦5.8% (-15.2, 4.7)
2
PM2.6 (6th Day)
10.0% (-4.7, 26.8)
0
8.3% (-5.4, 24.0)
1
0.3% (-12.4,14.9)
2
Cancer
PM2.6 (Daily)
¦0.3% (-9.4, 9.8)
0-2 avg
¦4.5% (-11.2, 2.8)
0
2.7% (-5.0,11.0)
1
2.5% (-5.1,10.7)
2
PM2.6 (6th Day)
¦5.1% (-13.8, 4.5)
0
¦0.3% (-9.7,11.0)
1
0.2% (-9.1,10.4)
2
July 2009
E-463
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Wilson et al. (2007,157149) Outcome: Cardiovascular
Period of Study: 1995-1997
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM,
nonparametric smoothing spline
Age Groups: >25
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Excess Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag: Central Phoenix: 11.5% (2.8, 20.9)
0-5 ma
6.6% (1.1,12.5)
1
2.0% (-3.2, 7.5)
2
Middle Phoenix: 2.9% (-4.9,11.4)
0-5 ma
6.4% (1.1,11.9)
2
Outer Phoenix: 1.6% (-6.2,10.0)
0-5 ma
'All units expressed in/yglm3 unless otherwise specified.
Table E-19. Short-term exposure - mortality - other PM size fractions.
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Perez et al. (2008,156020) Outcome: respiratory mortality
Period of Study: 3/27/2003-12/31/2005 Study Design: cohort
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Covariates: temperature, humidity
Statistical Analysis: autoregressive
Poisson regression models
Statistical Package: NR
Age Groups: All deaths
Pollutant: PMi
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD)Unit: 20.0 (10.3)/yg/m3
Range (Min, Max): 1.9, 80.1
Copollutant: PM102 E, PMyj. i
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Odds Ratio |95%CI)
Lag
Avg L0-1: 1.005 (0.960-1.053), p -
0.824
L1: 1.012(0.969-1.056), p - 0.599
L2: 1.042 (0.998-1.087), p - 0.063
Multi-pollutant Model
Avg L0-1: 1.007 (0.957-1.059), p -
0.799
L1: 1.008 (0.961-1.058), p - 0.739
L2: 1.010(0.963-1.059), p - 0.678
Reference: Perez et al. (2008,156020) Outcome: cardiovascular mortality
Period of Study: 3/27/2003-12/31/2005 Study Design: cohort
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Covariates: temperature, humidity
Statistical Analysis: autoregressive
Poisson regression models
Statistical Package: NR
Age Groups: All deaths
Pollutant: PMi
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD)Unit: 20.0 (10.3)/yg/m3
Range (Min, Max): 1.9, 80.1
Copollutant: PM102 E, PMyj. i
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Odds Ratio |95%CI)
Lag
Avg L0-1: 1.028 (1.000-1.057), p -
0.054
L1: 1.029(1.003-1.056), p - 0.030
L2: 1.023 (0.996-1.050), p - 0.091
Multi-pollutant Model
Avg L0-1: 1.025 (0.995-1.057), p -
0.688
L1: 1.028(1.000-1.058), p - 0.053
L2: 1.024 (0.995-1.053), p - 0.110
July 2009
E-464
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Pollutant: PMi Increment: 10/yg/m3
Averaging Time: 24 h Odds Ratio (95%CI)
Mean (SD) Unit: 20.0 (10.3) //g/m3 Lag
Range (Min, Max): 1.9, 80.1 Avg L0-1: 1.037 (0.981-1.097), p -
0.202
Copollutant: PMubj,, PMyj. i
L1: 1.056(1.003-1.113), p - 0.039
L2: 1.020 (0.968-1.075), p - 0.460
Multi-pollutant Model
Avg L0-1: 1.042 (0.981-1.107), p -
0.179
L1: 1.063(1.004-1.124), p - 0.035
L2: 1.034 (0.976-1.095), p - 0.255
Reference: Slaughter et al. (2005,
Outcome: Mortality: Non-accidental
Pollutant: PMi This study does not present quantitative
073854)
(< 800)
results for PMi.
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Period of Study: 1/1995-12/1999
Study Design: Time-series
Mean (SD): NR
Location: Spokane, Washington
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GLM,
Range (9th, 95th)
natural splines
Age Groups: All ages
PMi: (3.3,17.6)
Copollutant (correlation): PMi
PM2.6: r - 0.95
PM10: r - 0.50
PMio-2.5: r - 0.19
CO: r - 0.63
July 2009 E-465 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
Reference: Perez et al. (2008,156020)
Period of Study: 3/27/2003-12/31/2005
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Outcome: cerebrovascular mortality
Study Design: cohort
Covariates: temperature, humidity
Statistical Analysis: autoregressive
Poisson regression models
Statistical Package: NR
Age Groups: All deaths
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Stolzel et al. (2007, 091374) Outcome: Mortality:
Period of Study: 9/1995-8/2001
Location: Erfurt, Germany
Total (non-accidental) (< 800)
Cardiorespiratory (390-459, 460-519,
785, 786)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Poisson GAM
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: MCo.i-ob, MCo.oi-2.b
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD):
MCo i ob: 17.6 (14.8)
MC0.01-2.B: 22.3(19.2)
IQR (25th, 75th):
MCo.i-ob: (8.4, 21.5)
MCo.oi-2.b: (10.5,27.3)
Copollutant (correlation):
MCo.i-ob
NO: r - 0.52
NO?: r - 0.60
CO: r - 0.58
MCo.01-2.B
NO: r - 0.51
NO?: r - 0.58
CO: r - 0.57
July 2009
E-466
Increment:
MCoi-ob: 13.1 /yglm3
MCo.oi-2.b: 16.8 /yglm3
Relative Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Total (non-accidental)
MC0.10.B
1.010(0.986
1.034)
0
1.006(0.983
1.029)
1
1.007(0.985
1.029)
2
0.994 (0.973
1.016)
3
1.002(0.981
1.023)
4
0.997 (0.976
1.018)
5
MCo.01-2.B
1.007 (0.985
1.030)
0
1.005 (0.984
1.026)
1
1.003 (0.983
1.023)
2
0.989 (0.970
1.009)
3
1.002 (0.982
1.022)
4
0.998 (0.979
1.018)
5
Cardiorespiratory
MCoi-ob
1.004 (0.977
WAfr- DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
0
1.004 (0.979
1 029)
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Yamazaki et al. (2007,
090748)
Period of Study: 1995-1998
Location: Hong Kong, China
Outcome: Mortality:
Intracerebral hemorrhage (431)
Ischaemic stroke (434)
Study Design: Time-stratified case-
crossover
Statistical Analyses: Conditional logistic
regression
Age Groups: a 65
Pollutant: PM7
Averaging Time: 1-h avg
Mean (SD):
Warmer Months (April-September):
40.3
Colder Months (October-March):
39.4
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation): Warmer
Months
NO2: r - 0.46 to 0.63
Ox: r - -0.14 to 0.20
Colder Months
NO2: 0.42 to 0.79
Ox: r - -0.36 to -0.14
Increment: 30//gfm3
Odds Ratio (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
24-h avg concentrations
Intracerebral hemorrhage
Warmer months: 1.041 (0.984,1.102)
0
Colder months: 1.005 (0.951,1.061)
0
Ischaemic stroke
Warmer months: 1.027 (0.993,1.062)
0
Colder months: 1.005 (0.973,1.039)
0
Exposure measured jointly as 24-h and 1 -h
mean concentrations
Warmer months
Intracerebral hemorrhage
1 -h with 200 /yglm3 threshold: 2.397
(1.476,3.892)
2 h
24-h: 1.019 (0.960,1.082)
0
Ischaemic stroke
1 -h with 200 /yglm3 threshold: 1.051
(0.750,1.472)
2 h
24-h: 1.018 (0.983,1.055)
0
Warmer months
Intracerebral hemorrhage
1 -h with 200/yglm3 threshold: 0.970
(0.712,1.322)
2 h
24-h: 1.015 (0.958,1.075)
0
Ischaemic stroke
1 -h with 200 /yglm3 threshold: 1.040
(0.855,1.265)
2 h
24-h: 1.003 (0.968,1.039)
0
'All units expressed in/yglm3 unless otherwise specified.
July 2009
E-467
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
E.4. Long-Term Exposure and Cardiovascular Outcomes
Table E-20. Long-term exposure - cardiovascular morbidity outcomes - PM10
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Baccarelli et al. (2008,
157984)
Period of Study: 1995-2005
Location: Italy (Lombardy region)
Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10): Deep Vein
Thrombosis (DVT)
prothrombin time (PT)
activated partial thromboplastin time
(aPTT)
Age Groups: 18-84yrs
Study Design: Case-control (DVT
outcome)
Cross-sectional (PT and aPTT outcomes)
N: 871 cases
1210 controls (randomly selected from
friends and nonblood relatives of cases
frequency matched by age to cases)
Statistical Analyses: Unconditional
logistic regression (DVT outcome)
linear regression (PT and aPTT outcomes)
Covariates: sex, area of residence,
education, factor V Leiden or G2021 OA
prothrombin mutation, current use of oral
contraceptives or hormone therapy
(variables controlled using penalized
regression splines with 4 df) age, BMI,
day of year (for seasonality), index date,
ambient temperature
Season: covariate
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: STATA v9.0 and R
V2.2.0
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 1 year (immediately
preceding the diagnosis date for cases or
the date of examination for controls)
assessed other averaging periods
presented in supplements (90 days, 180
days, 270 days, 2 yrs)
Mean (SD): NR
Percentiles: NR
Range (Min, Max):
Range for tertiles of exposure:
1: 12.0-44.2
2: 44.3-48.1
3: 48.2-51.5
Monitoring Stations: Monitors from 53
sites
exposure assigned by dividing area into 9
regions
Copollutant (correlation): NR
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Estimated changes of PT associated
with PMio:
Among DVT cases: -0.12 (-0.23, 0.00), p
- 0.04
Among Controls: -0.06 (-0.11, 0.00), p -
0.04
Estimated changes of aPTT
associated with PMio: Among Controls:
¦0.09 (-0.19, 0.01), p - 0.07
Among DVT cases: 0.01 (-0.03, 0.04), p
- 0.78
Risk of DVT associated with PMio (avg
of 1 yr preceding diagnosis/exam
date): |
All subjects: 1.70 (1.30, 2.23), p <
0.001
Sex: Male: 2.07 (1.50, 2.84), p <
0.001
Female: 1.40(1.02,1.92), p - 0.04
P for interaction: p - 0.02
Age: 18-35yrs: 1.57 (1.11, 2.24), p -
0.01
36-50yrs: 1.97 (1.41, 2.77), p < 0.001
51 -84yrs: 1.54 (0.90, 2.63), p - 0.12
P for interaction: p - 0.99
Premenopausal women with current
use of oral contraceptives: No: 1.53
(0.86, 2.72), p - 0.14Yes: 0.87(0.46,
1.67), p - 0.68
P for interaction: p - 0.11
Postmenopausal women with current
use of hormone therapy: No: 1.60
(0.72, 3.54), p - 0.24
Yes: 0.85 (0.29, 2.45), p - 0.76
P for interaction: p - 0.27
Current use of oral contraceptive or
hormone replacement therapy: No:
1.64(1.05, 2.57), p - 0.03
Yes: 0.97 (0.58,1.61), p - 0.89
P for interaction: p - 0.048
Body Mass Index: 13.3-22.0: 1.47
(0.97, 2.23), p - 0.07;
22.1-24.9: 1.72 (1.17, 2.54), p - 0.006
25.0-53.3: 1.83(1.03, 3.24), p - 0.04
P for interaction: p - 0.37
_Education^_EJementar^/m^ddle_school^^^
July 2009
E-468
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
1.93(1.35, 2.76), p < 0.001
High school: 1.72(1.24, 2.39), p -
0.001
College: 1.35 (0.74, 2.45), p - 0.33
P for interaction: p - 0.21
Deficiencies of natural anticoagulant
proteins: None: 1.66 (1.26, 2.18), p <
0.001
Any: 2.56 (0.91, 7.18), p - 0.07
P for interaction: p - 0.41
Factor V Leiden or G20210A
prothrombin mutation: None: 1.69
(1.27,2.23), p < 0.001
Any: 1.79 (1.05, 3.05), p - 0.03
P for interaction: p - 0.83
Hyperhomocysteinemia: No: 1.66
(1.26,2.19), p < 0.001
Yes: 2.19(1.33, 3.61), p - 0.002
P for interaction: p - 0.25
Any cause of thrombophilia: No: 1.59
(1.19,2.13), p - 0.002
Yes: 1.96 (1.34, 2.87), p < 0.001
P for interaction: p - 0.27
Year of diagnosis: 1995-97: 1.61 (1.06,
2.46), p - 0.03
1998-00: 1.34 (0.90,1.99), p - 0.15
2001-05: 2.14(1.04,4.39), p - 0.04
P for interaction: p - 0.12
Risk of DVT associated with PMio
over varying averaging times: 90 days:
0.91 (0.80,1.03), p - 0.12
180 days: 0.96 (0.82,1.13), p - 0.63
270 days: 1.26(1.01,1.57), p - 0.04
365 days: 1.70(1.30, 2.23), p - 0.0001
2 years: 1.47 (1.01, 2.14), p - 0.04
Risk of DVT associated with PMio
(year preceding diagnosis/exam date)
sensitivity analysis to evaluate the
effect of different methods for
adjusting for long-term trends:
Handling of long-term time trends:
Ignored: 1.13 (0.89,1.42), p - 0.31
Dummy variable for each year: 1.78
(1.31,2.44), p - 0.0003
Linear term: 1.32 (1.02,1.69), p - 0.03
Penalized spline, 2 df: 1.54 (1.19, 2.00),
p - 0.001
Penalized spline, 3 df: 1.64 (1.26, 2.14),
p - 0.0002
Penalized spline, 4 df: 1.70 (1.30, 2.23),
p - 0.0001
Penalized spline, 5 df: 1.70(1.29, 2.22),
p - 0.0002
July 2009
E-469
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Penalized spline, 6 df: 1.66 (1.26, 2.19),
p - 0.0003
Penalized spline, 7 df: 1.60 (1.21,2.13),
p - 0.001
Penalized spline, 8 df: 1.55 (1.15, 2.10),
p - 0.004
Reference: Baccarelli et al. (2009,
188183)
Period of Study: 111995-912005
Location: Lombardia Region, Italy
Outcome: Deep Vein Thrombosis
Study Design: Case-control
Covariates: age, sex, area of residence,
BMI, education, medication use
Statistical Analysis: logistic regression
Statistical Package: Stata
Pollutant: PMio
Risk of DVT measured with regards to
distance of residence from major road.
Specific levels of PMio not given.
Increment: NA
Relative Risk |95%CI) of DVT
All subjects, age-adjusted: 1.33 (1.03-
1.71), p - 0.03
All subjects, adjusted for covariates: 1.47
(1.10-1.96), p - 0.008
All subjects, adjusted for covariates and
background PMio exposure: 1.47 (1.11-
1.96), p - 0.008
Reference: Calderon-Garciduenas et al.
(2008,156317)
Period of Study: Children recruited
between Jul 2003 and Dec 2004
Location: Mexico (northeast or
southwest Mexico city or Polotitlan)
Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10): Plasma
Endothelin-1 (ET-1) and pulmonary
arterial pressure (PAP)
Age Groups: 6-13 years
7.9 ± 1.3 years
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 81 children
Statistical Analyses: Analysis of
variance by parametric one-way analysis
of variance and the Newman-Keuls
multiple comparison post test, Pearson's
correlation
Covariates: doesn't appear to have
performed multivariable analyses
however, collected information on age,
place and length of residency, daily
outdoor time, household cooking
methods, parents' occupational history,
family history of atopic illnesses and
respiratory disease, and personal history
of otolaryngologic and respiratory
symptoms
Season: No
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: STATA v8.3, or
GraphPad Software, Inc.
Pollutant: PMio(|jg/m3)
Exposures assessed quantitatively in
Mexico City only
no monitors in Polotitlan
Averaging Time: 1, 2, and 7 days before
the exam
pollutant concentrations between 0700
and 1900 h were used for the estimates
Mean (SD): Presented only in figures
Percentiles: NR
Range (Min, Max): Presented only in
figures
Monitoring Stations: 4 (2 in northeast
and 2 in southwest Mexico City
residence and school within 5 miles of
one of these monitors)
Copollutant (correlation): 03
PM Increment: NA
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
No health effects models with measured
PM concentrations were presented
used city of residence to assign exposure
no multivariable analyses presented
Authors presented (statistically
significantly) elevated ET-1 levels among
children residing in both areas of Mexico
City as compared to Polotitlan (control
city):
Mean ± SE (pg/mL)
Control: 1.23 ± 0.06
Southwest Mexico City: 2.40 ± 0.14
Northeast Mexico City: 2.09 ± 0.10
Mexico City (overall): 2.24 ± 0.12
Authors presented (statistically
significantly) elevated PAP levels among
children residing in both areas of Mexico
City as compared to Polotitlan (control
city):
Mean ± SE (mmHg)
Control: 14.6 ± 0.4
Southwest Mexico City: 16.7 ± 0.6
Northeast Mexico City: 18.6 ± 0.9
Mexico City (overall): 17.3 ± 0.5
Correlation between ET-1 and time spent
outdoors: r - 0.31, p - 0.0012
Correlation between PAP and time spent
outdoors: r - 0.42, p - 0.0008
July 2009
E-470
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Diez Roux et al. (2008,
156401)
Period of Study: Baseline data collected
June 2000-Aug 2002
Exposure assessed retrospectively
between Aug 1982 and baseline date
Location: USA (6 field centers:
Baltimore, MD
Chicago, IL
Forsyth Co, NC
Los Angeles, CA
New York, NY
St. Paul, MN
Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10): Three
measures of subclinical atherosclerosis
(common carotid intimal-medial thickness
(CIMT), coronary artery calcification, and
ankle-brachial index (ABI))
Age Groups: 44-84 yrs (MESA cohort)
Study Design: Cross-sectional
retrospective cohort
N: 5172 for coronary calcium analysis
5037 for CIMT analysis
5110 for ABI analysis
Statistical Analyses: Generalized
Additive Models (Binomial regression:
presence of calcification
Linear regression: CIMT, ABI, amount of
calcium among persons with non-zero
calcification)
Covariates: age, sex, race/ethnicity,
socioeconomic factors, cardiovascular
risk factors (BMI, hypertension, high
density lipoprotein and low density
lipoprotein cholesterol, smoking, diabetes,
diet, physical activity
models presented with and without
adjustment for cardiovascular RFs)
Season: NA
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Pollutant: PMio
(|jg/m3)
Averaging Time: 20-yr imputed mean
Mean (SD): 34.1 (7.5)
Percentiles: NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Monitoring Stations: A spatio-temporal
model was used to predict monthly PM2.6
exposures based on the geographic
location of each participant's residence.
Copollutant (correlation with 20-year
imputed mean): PM10 20-yr observed
mean
r - 0.93
PM2.6 20-yr imputed mean
r - 0.73
PM10 2001 imputed mean
r - 0.75
PM10 2001 observed mean
r - 0.80
PM2.6 2001 mean
r - 0.86
PM Increment: 21.0 |Jgfm3 (approx.
10th-90th percentile)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
CIMT:
Relative difference (95% CI):
1.01 (1.00,1.02)
Adj. for additional CVD RFs:
1.02(1.00,1.03)
ABI:
Mean difference (95% CI):
0.002 (-0.005, 0.009)
Adj. for additional CVD RFs:
0.001 (-0.006, 0.009)
Coronary calcium:
Relative prevalence (95% CI):
1.02(0.96,1.07)
Adj. for additional CVD RFs:
1.02(0.96,1.08)
Coronary calcium (in those with
calcium):
Relative difference (95% CI):
0.98(0.84,1.13)
Adj. for additional CVD RFs:
1.01 (0.86,1.18)
Found no clear heterogeneity by age, sex,
lipid status, smoking status, diabetes
status, BMI, education or study site.
Reference: Maheswaran et al. (2005,
088683)
Period of Study: 1994-1998
Location: Sheffield, United Kingdom
Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10): Stroke
mortality (ICD9: 430-438) and Emergency
hospital admissions (ICD10:160-I69)
Age Groups: a 45 years
Study Design: Small area ecological
cross-sectional
N: 1030 census enumeration districts
(CEDs)
108 CEDs excluded from PM analyses
due to artifacts in the modeled emissions
data. The analysis was based on 2979
deaths, 5122 admissions and a
population of 199,682
Statistical Analyses: Poisson regression
Covariates: age, sex, socioeconomic
deprivation, and smoking prevalence
(some models also included age-by-
deprivation interaction)
Season: NA
Dose-response Investigated? Yes,
examined quintiles of exposure
Statistical Package: SAS
Pollutant: PM10
(|jg/m3)
Averaging Time: 5-yr avg
Mean (SD): Presented mean values and
ranges for each quintile of exposure:
1: 16.0 (< 16.8)
2: 17.5 (> 16.8, <18.2)
3: 18.8 (> 18.2, <19.3)
4: 19.8 (> 19.3, <20.6)
5: 23.3 (> 20.6)
Monitoring Stations: Used air pollution
model incorporating point, line and grid
sources of pollution and meteorological
data.
Copollutant (correlation): CO (r - 0.82)
NOx (r - 0.87)
PM Increment: NA
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Rate Ratios (95%CI) for stroke
mortality adjusted for overdispersion
by quintile of PM10 level
Adjusted for sex and age:
1: 1 (ref)
2: 0.95 (0.84,1.08)
3: 1.12(0.99,1.27)
4: 1.16(1.03,1.32)
5: 1.39(1.23,1.58)
Adjusted for sex, age, deprivation, and
smoking:
1: 1 (ref)
2: 0.94 (0.83,1.07)
3: 1.08 (0.94,1.24)
4: 1.12(0.97,1.29)
5: 1.33(1.14,1.56)
Rate Ratios (95%CI) for emergency
hospital admissions because of stroke
by quintile of PM10 level
Adjusted for sex and age:
July 2009
E-471
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
1: 1 (ref)
2: 1.06(0.95,1.17)
3: 1.10(0.99,1.23)
4: 1.25(1.12,1.38)
5: 1.40(1.26,1.55)
Adjusted for sex, age, deprivation, and
smoking:
1: 1 (ref)
2: 1.01 (0.91,1.13)
3: 0.98(0.87,1.10)
4: 1.08(0.96,1.22)
5: 1.13(0.99,1.29)
Rate Ratios (95%CI) for stroke
mortality in relation to spatially
smoothed (using a Mini radius)
modeled outdoor air pollution
quintiles
Adjusted for sex, age, socioeconomic
deprivation, age by deprivation
interaction, and smoking prevalence:
1: 1 (ref)
2: 0.86(0.75, 0.98)
3: 1.05(0.92,1.21)
4: 1.03(0.89,1.19)
5: 1.24(1.05,1.47)
Rate Ratios (95%CI) for emergency
hospital admissions because of stroke
in relation to spatially smoothed
modeled outdoor air pollution
quintiles
Adjusted for sex, age, socioeconomic
deprivation, age by deprivation
interaction, and smoking prevalence:
1: 1 (ref)
2: 1.05(0.94,1.17)
3:1.07(0.95,1.20)
4: 1.06(0.94,1.20)
5: 1.15(1.01,1.31)
Reference: Maheswaran et al. (2005,
090769)
Period of Study: 1994-1998
Location: Sheffield, United Kingdom
Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10): Coronary
Heart Disease (CHD) mortality (ICD9:
410-414) and Emergency hospital
admissions (ICD10:120-I25)
Age Groups: a 45 years
Study Design: Small area ecological
cross-sectional
N: 1030 census enumeration districts
(CEDs)
108 CEDs excluded from PM analyses
due to artifacts in the modeled emissions
data. Results based on 6857 deaths,
11407 hospital admissions and 199,682
people aged a 45 years
Statistical Analyses: Poisson regression
Covariates: age, sex, socioeconomic
JejjNvatioiijjin^^
Pollutant: PMio
Mm3)
Averaging Time: 5-yr avg
Mean (SD): Presented mean values and
ranges for each quintile of exposure:
1: 16.0 (< 16.8)
2: 17.5 (> 16.8, <18.2)
3: 18.8 (> 18.2, <19.3)
4: 19.8 (> 19.3, <20.6)
5: 23.3 (> 20.6)
Monitoring Stations: Study used an air
pollution model incorporating points,
lines, and grids as sources of pollution,
and meteorological data.
PM Increment: NA
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Rate Ratios (95%CI) for CHD mortality
in relation to modeled outdoor air
pollution quintiles, adjusted for
overdispersion
Adjusted for sex and age:
1: 1 (ref)
2: 1.06(0.98,1.16)
3: 1.10(1.01,1.21)
4: 1.23(1.13,1.35)
5: 1.30(1.19,1.43)
Adjusted for sex, age, deprivation, and
smoking:
July 2009
E-472
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
(some models also included age-by-
deprivation interaction)
Season: NA
Dose-response Investigated? Yes,
examined quintiles of exposure
Statistical Package: SAS
Copollutant (correlation): CO (r - 0.82) 1: 1 (ref)
NOx (r - 0.87)
2: 1.03 (0.94,1.12)
3: 1.00 (0.90,1.11)
4: 1.08 (0.98,1.20)
5: 1.08 (0.96,1.20)
Adjusted for sex, age, deprivation, and
smoking (spatially smoothed using a 1km
radius):
1: 1 (ref)
2: 0.97 (0.89,1.07)
3: 1.00 (0.90,1.10)
4: 1.03 (0.93,1.15)
5:1.07 (0.96,1.21)
Rate Ratios (95%CI) for emergency
hospital admissions from CHD in
relation to modeled outdoor air
pollution quintiles
Adjusted for sex and age:
1: 1 (ref)
2: 1.08 (0.98,1.19)
3: 1.11 (1.01,1.22)
4:1.17(1.07,1.29)
5: 1.36(1.23,1.50)
Adjusted for sex, age, deprivation, and
smoking:
1: 1 (ref)
2: 1.03 (0.93,1.13)
3: 0.96 (0.86,1.07)
4: 0.97 (0.87,1.08)
5: 1.01 (0.90,1.14)
Adjusted for sex, age, deprivation, and
smoking (spatially smoothed using a 1km
radius):
1: 1 (ref)
2: 1.01 (0.92,1.11)
3: 1.04 (0.93,1.15)
4: 0.97 (0.87,1.08)
5:1.07 (0.95,1.20)
July 2009
E-473
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: O'Neill et al. (2007,156006)
Period of Study: 2000-2004
Location: USA (6 field centers:
Baltimore, MD
Chicago, IL
Forsyth Co, NC
Los Angeles, CA
New York, NY
St. Paul, MN
Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10): Creatinine
adjusted urinary albumin excretion
Assessed 2 ways: continuous log urinary
albumin/creatine ration (UACR) and
clinically defined micro- or macro-
albuminuria (UACR a 25 mg/g) versus
normal levels
Age Groups: 44-84 yrs
Study Design: Cross-sectional analyses
and prospective cohort analyses
N: 3901 participants free of clinical CVD
at baseline
Statistical Analyses: At baseline:
multiple linear regression (continuous
outcome)
binomial regression (dichotomous
outcome)
3-year change: repeated measures model
with random subject effects (estimate 3-
yr change in log UACR by levels of
exposure)
Covariates: age, gender, race, BMI,
cigarette status, ETS, percent dietary
protein
for repeated measures models: time
time x PMio
Season: NA
Dose-response Investigated? Yes,
examined quartiles of exposure
Statistical Package: SAS
Pollutant: PMio
N/m3)
Averaging Time: avg of previous month,
avg of previous 2 months (recent
exposures)
20-yr directly monitored PMio avg, 20-yr
imputed PMio avg (longer-term exposures)
Mean (SD):
Previous 20 years: 34.7 (7.0)
Previous month: 27.5 (7.9)
Percentiles: NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Monitoring Stations: NR (used closest
monitor to residence to assign exposure
20 year imputed PMio was derived using
a space-time model)
Copollutant (correlation): PM2.6
PM Increment: 10/yglm3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Adjusted mean differences in log
UACR (mg/g) per increase in PMio
among participants seen at baseline
Previous 30 days
Full sample: -0.42 (-0.085, 0.002)
Within 10 km:-0.023 (-0.079, 0.034)
Previous 60 days
Full sample: -0.056 (-0.106 to -0.005)
Within 10 km:-0.040 (-0.106, 0.025)
20 yr PMio (nearest monitors)
Full sample:-0.019 (-0.072, 0.033)
Within 10 km: 0.009 (-0.067,0.085)
Imputed 20 yr exposure
Full sample:-0.002 (-0.038, 0.035)
Within 10 km: 0.016 (-0.033, 0.066)
Adjusted relative prevalence of
microalbuminuria vs high-normal and
normal levels (below 25 mg/g) per
increase in PMio among participants
without macroalbuminuria during the
baseline visit
Previous 30 days: 0.88 (0.76,1.02)
Previous 60 days: 0.83 (0.70, 0.99)
20 yr PMio (nearest monitors): 0.92
(0.77,1.08)
Imputed 20 yr exposure: 0.98 (0.87,
1.10)
Adjusted mean 3-yr change (SE) in log
UACR (mg/g) by quartiles of 1982-
2002 exposure to PMio from ambient
monitors among participants seen in
2000-20004
Full sample
~uartile:
18.5 to <29.3:0.147 (0.024)
29.3 to <33.1:0.159 (0.024)
33.1 to <36.3:0.163 (0.024)
36.3 to 55.7: 0.174 (0.023)
p-trend: 0.42
Within 10 km
~uartile:
18.5to <29.3:0.159 (0.030)
29.3 to <33.1:0.155 (0.031)
33.1 to <36.3:0.167 (0.028)
36.3 to 55.7: 0.152 (0.036)
p-trend: 0.99
Interactions with either 20 year or
shorter-term PM exposure were not
significant (p < 0.01) by gender, age,
city, race/ethnicity or study site.
July 2009
E-474
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Puett et al, (2008,156891)
Outcome: Nonfatal myocardial infarction
Pollutant: PM10
Increment: 10 |Jgfm3
Period of Study: 1992-2002
Study Design: Cohort
Averaging Time: 3,12, 24, 36 and 48
Hazard Ratio, 95% CI, 12 month
month moving averages
moving average
Location: Northeastern metropolitan US
Covariates: age in months, state of
residence, year and season
Mean (SD) Unit: NR
0.94 (0.77-1.15)
Statistical Analysis: Cox proportional
Range (Min, Max): NR
hazard
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Statistical Package: SAS
Age Groups: 30-55
Reference: Rosenlund et al. (2006,
114678)
Period of Study: 1992-1994
Location: Stockholm County, Sweden
Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10): Myocardial
infarction (Ml)
Age Groups: 45-70 yrs
Study Design: Case-control
N: 1397 cases
1870 controls
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression (main analysis)
also performed multinomial logistic
regression to assess cases as nonfatal,
fatal in the hospital within 28 days, and
out-of-hospital death within 28 days with
all controls as reference
Covariates: age, sex, and hospital
catchment area (frequency matched
variables)
smoking, physical inactivity, diabetes,
SES
also assessed but did not include
hypertension, BMI, job strain, diet,
passive smoking, alcohol consumption,
coffee intake, and occupational exposure
to motor exhaust and other combustion
products
Season: NA
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: STATA v8.2
Pollutant: PMio
(modeled traffic-related pollution
also modeled PM2.6, but since the PM
correlation was high (r - 0.998) only
PM10 results were presented) (|jg/m )
Averaging Time: 30 yrs (PM only
assessed during 2000, thus assumed
constant levels during 1960-2000)
Median (5th—95th percentile):
Cases: 2.6 (0.5-6.0)
Controls: 2.4 (0.6-5.9)
Range (Min, Max): NR
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant (correlation): NO2
(r - 0.93)
CO (r - 0.66)
SO?
PM Increment: 5 /yglm3 (5th to 95th
percentile distribution among controls)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Association of 30-yr avg exposure to air
pollution from traffic with Ml
Logistic regression
All cases: 1.00 (0.79,1.27)
Multinomial logistic regression
Nonfatal cases: 0.92 (0.71,1.19)
Fatal cases: 1.39 (0.94, 2.07)
ln-hospital death: 1.21 (0.75,1.94)
Out-of-hospital death: 1.84 (1.00, 3.40)
After adjustment for heating-related SO2,
the estimate for fatal Ml was 1.40 (0.86-
2.26) for PM10.
Reference: Zanobetti 81 Schwartz (2007,
091247)
Period of Study: 1985-1999
Location: 21 US cities (Birmingham,
Alabama
Boulder, Colorado
Canton, Ohio
Chicago, Illinois
Cincinnati, Ohio
Cleveland, Ohio
Colorado Springs, Colorado
Columbus, Ohio
Denver, Colorado
Detroit, Michigan
Honolulu, Hawaii
Houston, Texas
Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota
Nashville, Tennessee
Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10): Death,
subsequent myocardial infarction (Ml
ICD9 codes 410.0-410.9), and a first
admission for congestive heart failure
(CHF
ICD9 code 428)
Age Groups: a 65 yrs
Study Design: Cohort
N: 196,000 persons discharged alive
following an acute Ml
Statistical Analyses: Cox's Proportional
Hazards Regression
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: Yearly averages of
pollution for that year and lags up to the
3 previous years (distributed lag)
Mean (SD): 28.8 (all cities
SD not reported)
Percentiles: 10, 50, and 90 percentiles
listed individually for each city (Table 2)
Range (Min, Max): NR
Monitoring Stations: NR (obtained data
from the US EPA Aerometric Information
Retrieval System)
Meta-regression for city-specific results Copollutant (correlation): None
Covariates: age, sex, race, type of Ml,
number of days of coronary care and
intensive care, previous diagnoses for
atrial fibrillation, and secondary or
previous diagnoses for C0PD, diabetes,
and hypertension, and for season of initial
event (time period, and, sex, race, and
type of Ml were treated as stratification
variables)
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Hazard ratio (95%CI) for an increase in
PM for the year of failure and for the
distributed lag from the year of failure up
to 3 previous years
Death
PM10 annual: 1.11 (1.05,1.19), p -
0.001
Distributed lag model
Lag 0:1.04 (0.96,1.14), p - 0.336
Lag 1:1.07 (0.99,1.14), p - 0.070
Lag 2:1.14 (1.10,1.18), p - 0.000
Lag 3:1.06 (0.99,1.12), p - 0.077
Sum lags 0-3: 1.34 (1.14,1.52), p -
0.000
CHF
PM10 annual: 1.11 (1.03,1.21), p -
0.009
July 2009
E-475
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
New Haven, Connecticut
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Provo Orem, Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah
Seattle, Washington
Steubenville, Ohio
and Youngstown, Ohio)
Season: Assessed as a confounder
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Distributed lag model
Lag 0
Lag 1
Lag 2
Lag 3
1.09 (1.01,1.18), p - 0.030
1.09 (1.01,1.19), p - 0.038
1.13(1.02,1.25), p - 0.014
1.04 (0.97,1.12), p - 0.260
Sum lags 0-3: 1.41 (1.19,1.66), p -
0.000
PMio annual: 1.17 (1.05,1.31), p ¦
0.003
Distributed lag model
Lag 0
Lag 1
Lag 2
Lag 3
1.09 (0.92,1.30), p - 0.325
1.12(0.97,1.30), p - 0.108
1.15(1.08,1.23), p - 0.000
1.01 (0.94,1.09), p - 0.783
Sum lags 0-3: 1.43 (1.12,1.82), p -
0.005
Hazard Ratio (95%CI) for an increase in
PM (sum of the previous 3 yrs distributed
lag) for the sensitivity analyses
Death
Subjects with follow-up starting after 2nd
Ml:
1.33(1.15,1.55), p - 0.000
Subjects admitted between 1985-1996:
1.45(1.26,1.68), p - 0.000
2nd cohort definition (year defined at time
of Ml):
1.29(1.15,1.44), p - 0.000
CHF
Subjects with follow-up starting after 2nd
Ml:
1.42(1.22,1.65), p - 0.000
Subjects admitted between 1985-1996:
1.51 (1.26,1.81), p - 0.000
2nd Ml
Subjects admitted between 1985-1996:
1.62(1.23, 2.13), p - 0.001
Note: Age and sex effect modification
results presented in Figure 1
used meta-regression to examine
predictors of heterogeneity across city
and found that most predictors were not
significant modifiers of PM (Table 7)
'All units expressed in //gfm3 unless otherwise specified.
Table E-21. Long-term effects-cardiovascular- PM2.5 (including PM components/sources)
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Allen et al. (2009,189644)
Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10): Abdominal
Pollutant: PM2.6 (/yglm3)
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
July 2009
E-476
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Period of Study: Oct 2000—Sep 2002
(exposure averaging period)
outcome assessed in 2002
Location: 5 US communities (Chicago,
Illinois
Forsyth County, North Carolina
Los Angeles, California
Northern Manhattan and the Bronx, New
York
and St. Paul, Minnesota)
part of MESA (Multi-ethnic Study of
Atherosclerosis)
aortic calcium (AAC), a marker of
systemic atherosclerosis (quantitative
measure of interest was the Agatston
score)
Age Groups: 46-88 years
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 1,147 participants (sensitivity analysis
among 1,269 participants)
Statistical Analyses: 2-part modeling
approach:
1) modeled relative risk of having any
AAC using a log link and a Gaussian error
model
sensitivity analysis used modified Poisson
regression with robust error variance
2) multiple linear regression of the log-
transformed AAC Agatston score (among
those with AAC >0)
sensitivity analysis modeled all
participants by adding 1 prior to log-
transforming
Covariates: age, gender, race/ethnicity,
BMI, smoking status, pack-year of
smoking, diabetes, education, annual
income, blood lipid concentration, blood
pressure, and medications
assessed impact of gender, age, diabetes,
obesity, use of lipid-lowering medications,
education, income, race/ethnicity, and
employment status on heterogeneity of
effects (or in sensitivity analyses)
Season: NA
Dose-response Investigated? NR
Statistical Package: SAS v9.1
Averaging Time: 2 year averaging period
(Oct 2000-Sep 2002)
Mean (SD): 15.8 (3.6) (Jg/m3
Percentiles: NR
Range (Min, Max): 10.6-24.7/yglm3
Monitoring Stations: All monitors with
1) the objective of "population exposure,"
"regional transport," or
"generalfbackground;) and 2) at least
50% data reporting in each of 8 3-month
periods over the averaging time
used monitors located within 50 km of a
study participant's residence
Copollutant (correlation): (assessed
traffic by roadway proximity)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Results for fully adjusted models under
different participant inclusion,
employment status, and roadway
proximity criteria.
Presence/Absence of Calcium
RR (95% CI)
Inclusion criteria: < 10yrs at address:
1.04 (0.89,1.22)
a 10yrs at address: 1.06 (0.96,1.16)
a 10yrs at address & < 10km from
monitor: 1.08 (0.98,1.18)
a 20yrs at address: 1.10 (0.99,1.22)
a 20yrs at address & < 10km from
monitor: 1.11 (1.00,1.24)
< 10yrs at address & employed: 1.02
(0.87,1.20)
a 20yrs at address & employed: 1.07
(0.89,1.27)
< 10yrs at address & not employed:
1.10(1.00,1.22)
a 20yrs at address & not employed: 1.16
(1.02,1.31)
< 10yrs at address & near major road:
0.85(0.69,1.05)
a 20yrs at address & not near major
road: 1.10(0.99,1.23)
Log-transformed Agatston Score
(Agatston >0)
% Change (95% CI)
Inclusion criteria: < 10yrs at address: ¦
6.6 (-64.0, 50.9)
a 10yrs at address: 8.0 (-29.7,45.7)
a 10yrs at address & < 10km from
monitor: 19.7 (-19.6, 58.9)
a 20yrs at address: 14.4 (-32.8, 61.7)
a 20yrs at address & < 10km from
monitor: 24.6 (-24.6, 73.8)
< 10yrs at address & employed: 29.1
(-25.7,83.8)
a 20yrs at address & employed: 43.8
(-32.4,119.9)
< 10yrs at address & not employed: ¦
15.1 (-66.3,36.1)
a 20yrs at address & not employed: ¦
14.1 (-72.6,44.4)
< 10yrs at address & near major road:
34.0 (-44.2,112.1)
a 20yrs at address & not near major
road: 3.9 (-39.9, 47.8)
Log-transformed Agatston Score (all)
% Change (95% CI)
Inclusion criteria: < 10yrs at address: ¦
8.5(-81.3, 64.2)
a 10yrs at address: 40.7 (-11.5, 92.8)
July 2009
E-477
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
a 10yrs at address & < 10km from
monitor: 60.7 (5.9,115.4)
a 20yrs at address: 64.1 (-1.73,129.9)
a 20yrs at address & < 10km from
monitor: 79.2 (10.1,148.3)
< 10yrs at address & employed: 33.5
(¦35.9,102.9)
a 20yrs at address & employed: 55.8
(¦37.2,148.7)
< 10yrs at address & not employed:
54.8 (-23.8,133.4)
a 20yrs at address & not employed: 89.3
(¦3.7,182.3)
< 10yrs at address & near major road: -
30.6 (-141.3, 80.1)
a 20yrs at address & not near major
road: 51.3 (-8.3,110.8)
Exploratory/sensitivity analyses (also
presented in figures): Detectable AAC
RR (95%CI): Among women: 1.14 (1.00,
1.30)
Among persons >65yrs: 1.10 (1.01,
1.19)
Among users of lipid-lowering
medications: 1.14 (1.00,1.30)
Among Hispanics: 1.22 (1.03,1.45)
Imputing missing covariates among
residentially stable participants: 1.08
(0.98,1.19)
Agatston score
% change (95%CI): Among Hispanics: 64
(-4,133)
Among persons earning > $50,000: 72
(5,139)
Agatston score including those with
Agatston = 0
% change (95%CI): Fully adjusted model:
41 (-12, 93)
Among persons >65yrs: 75 (8,143)
Among diabetics: 149 (29, 270)
Among users of lipid-lowering
medications: 121 (25, 217)
Among Hispanics: 141 (45, 236)
Imputing missing Covariates: 49 (1.3,
100.1)
Reference: Auchincloss et al. (2008,
156234)
Period of Study: Jul 2000-Aug 2002
Location: 6 US communities (Baltimore
City and Baltimore County, Maryland
Chicago, Illinois
Forsyth County, North Carolina
Los Angeles, California
Northern Manhattan and the Bronx, New
York
Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10): Blood
pressure: systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP),
mean arterial (MAP), pulse pressure (PP)
Avg of 2nd and 3,d BP measurement used
for analyses
Age Groups: 45-84 years
Study Design: Cross-sectional (Multi-
Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis baseline
examination)
N: 5,112 persons (free of clinically
apparent cardiovascular disease)
Pollutant: PM2.6 (/L/g|m3)
Averaging Time: 5 exposure metrics
constructed: prior day, avg of prior 2
days, prior 7 days, prior 30 days, and
prior 60 days
Mean (SD): Prior day: 17.0(10.5)
Prior 2 days: 16.8 (9.3)
Prior 7 days: 17.0 (6.9)
Prior 30 days: 16.8 (5.0)
Prior 60 days: 16.7 (4.4)
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3 (approx.
equivalent to difference between 90th
and 10th percentile for prior 30 day
mean)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Adjusted mean difference (95% CI) in PP
and SBP (mmHg) per 10 /yglm3 increase
in PM2.E (averaged for the prior 30 days)
Pulse Pressure
Adjustment variables: Person-level
Covariates: 1.04 (0.25,1.84)
Person-level cov., weather: 1.12 (0.28,
July 2009
E-478
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
and St. Paul, Minnesota)
part of MESA (Multi-ethnic Study of
Atherosclerosis)
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression Percentiles: NR
secondary analyses used log binomial
models to fit a binary hypertension
outcome
Covariates: age, sex, race/ethnicity, per
capita family income, education, BMI,
diabetes status, cigarette smoking
status, exposure to ETS, high alcohol use,
physical activity, BP medication use,
meteorology variables, and copollutants
Range (Min, Max): NR
Monitoring Stations: Used monitor
nearest the participant's residence to
calculate exposure metrics
Copollutant (correlation):
SO?
NO?
examined site as a potential confounder qq
and effect modifier
Traffic-related exposures (straight-line
heterogeneity of effects also examined by distance to a highway
traffic-related exposures, age, sex, type 2
diabetes, hypertensive status, cigarette total road length around a residence)
use
Season: Adjusted for temperature and
barometric pressure to adjust for
seasonality (because seasons vary by the
study sites)
Also performed sensitivity analyses
adjusting for season to examine the
potential for residual confounding not
accounted for by weather variables
Dose-response Investigated? Assessed
nonlinear relationships-no evidence of
strong threshold/nonlinear effects for
PM2.6
Statistical Package: NR
1.97)
Person-level cov., weather, gaseous
copollutants: 2.66 (1.61, 3.71)
Person-level cov., study site: 0.93 (-0.04,
1.90)
Person-level cov., study site, weather:
1.11 (0.01,2.22)
Person-level cov., study site, weather,
gaseous copollutants: 1.34 (0.10, 2.59)
Systolic Blood Pressure
Adjustment variables: Person-level
Covariates: 0.66 (-0.41,1.74)
Person-level cov., weather: 0.99 (-0.15,
2.13)
Person-level cov., weather, gaseous
copollutants: 2.8 (1.38, 4.22)
Person-level cov., study site: 0.86 (-0.45,
2.17)
Person-level cov., study site, weather:
1.32 (-0.18, 2.82)
Person-level cov., study site, weather,
gaseous copollutants: 1.52 (-0.16, 3.21)
Additional results: Associations became
stronger with longer averaging periods up
to 30 days. For example: Adjusted
(personal covariates and weather) mean
differences in PP: Prior day: -0.38 (-0.76,
0.00)
Prior 2 days: -0.22 (-0.65, 0.21)
Prior 7 days: 0.52 (-0.08,1.11)
Prior 30 days: 1.12(0.28,1.97)
Prior 60 days: 1.08 (0.11,2.05)
(Pattern held for additional adjustments
and for SBP results
therefore, only results for 30-day mean
differences were presented)
Additional results (not presented):
None of DBP results were statistically
significant
results for MAP were similar to SBP,
though weaker and generally not
significant
Effect modification: associations
between PM2.6 and BP were stronger for
persons taking medications, with
hypertension, during warmer weather, in
the presence of high NO2, residing £
300m from a highway, and surrounded by
a high density of roads (Fig 1)
associations were not modified for age,
sex, diabetes, cigarette smoking, study
site, high levels of CO or SO2, season ,
nor residence £ 400m fro a highway
Note: supplementary material available
on-line
Reference: Calderon-Garciduenas et al.
(2009,192107)
Period of Study: 9/11/2004-1/6/2005
Location: Mexico City and Polotitlan,
Outcome: Flow cytometry
Study Design: Panel
Covariates: NR
_Statistical_^nal^sis^_Pearson^s_
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 1, 2 and 7 day
averages
Mean (SD) Unit: 35.89 ± 0.93 |Jg/m3
Increment: NR
Flow cytometry results and their
statistical significance in control
versus exposed children
July 2009
E-479
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Mexico
Correlation
Statistical Package: Stata
Age Groups: 9.7 ± 1.2 years
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant: PMm, 0:i
CD3
Exposed: 62.9 ±1.8
Control: 67.1 ±1.7
P - 0.1
CD4
Exposed: 39.3 ±1.3
Control: 38.2±1.4
P - 0.57
CD8
Exposed: 24.0±0.95
Control: 27.3±1.0
P - 0.02
CD4/CD8
Exposed: 1.7 ±0.14
Control: 1.4 ±0.07
P - 0.09
CD3-/CD19 +
Exposed: 11.8 ±1.0
Control: 14.8 ± 1.0
P - 0.04
CD56 +
Exposed: 11.5 ±1.2
Control: 12.4±1.5
P - 0.63
CD56+/CD3-NK
Exposed: 14.0 ±9.5
Control: 7.0±2.7
P - 0.003
HLA-DR +
Exposed: 27.5±4.2
Control: 17.0±2.4
P - 0.04
mCD14+
Exposed: 66.5±2.3
Control: 80.6±1.8
P - <0.001
CD14/CD69
Exposed: 0.20±0.07
Control: 1.0 ±0.26
P - <0.001
CD4/CD69
Exposed: 0.08±0.03
Control: 3.1 ±0.65
P - <0.001
July 2009
E-480
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Diez Roux et al. (2008,
156401)
Period of Study: Baseline data collected
June 2000-Aug 2002
Exposure assessed retrospectively
between Aug 1982 and baseline date
Location: USA (6 field centers:
Baltimore, MD
Chicago, IL
Forsyth Co, NC
Los Angeles, CA
New York, NY
St. Paul, MN
Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10): Three
measures of subclinical atherosclerosis
(common carotid intimal-medial thickness
(CIMT), coronary artery calcification, and
ankle-brachial index (ABI))
Age Groups: 44-84 yrs
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 5172 for coronary calcium analysis
5037 for CIMT analysis
5110 for ABI analysis
Statistical Analyses: Generalized
Additive Models (Binomial regression:
presence of calcification
Linear regression: CIMT, ABI, amount of
calcium)
Covariates: age, sex, race/ethnicity,
socioeconomic factors, cardiovascular
risk factors (BMI, hypertension, high
density lipoprotein and low density
lipoprotein cholesterol, smoking, diabetes,
diet, physical activity
models presented with and without
adjustment for cardiovascular RFs)
Season: NA
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Pollutant: PM2.6 (/yglm3)
Averaging Time: 20-yr imputed mean
Mean (SD): 21.7 (5.0)
Percentiles: NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Monitoring Stations: NR
Long-term exposure to PM estimated
based on residential history reported
retrospectively
all addresses geocoded
ambient AP obtained from US EPA
Copollutant (correlation): PM10 20-yr
observed mean
r - 0.64
PM10 20-yr imputed mean
r - 0.73
PM10 2001 mean
r - 0.43
PM2.6 2001 mean
r - 0.64
Due to high correlation among PM
exposures, only results of mean 20-yr
exposures are reported.
PM Increment: 12.5 |Jgfm3 (approx.
10th-90th percentile)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
CIMT:
Relative difference (95% CI):
1.01 (1.00,1.01)
Adj. for additional CVD RFs:
1.01 (1.00,1.02)
ABI:
Mean difference (95% CI):
0.000 (-0.006, 0.006)
Adj. for additional CVD RFs:
¦0.001 (-0.006,0.006)
Coronary calcium:
Relative prevalence (95% CI):
1.01 (0.96,1.05)
Adj. for additional CVD RFs:
1.01 (0.96,1.06)
Coronary calcium (in those with
calcium):
Relative difference (95% CI):
0.99(0.88,1.12)
Adj. for additional CVD RFs:
1.01 (0.89,1.14)
July 2009
E-481
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Hoffman et al. (2007,
091163)
Period of Study: 2000-2003
Location: Ruhr area of Germany (3 large
cities: Essen, Mulheim, and Bochum)
Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10): Coronary
artery calcification (CAC)
Age Groups: 45-74 years
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 4494 participants
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression
(outcome - natural logarithm of CAC
score + 1)
logistic regression (outcome - CAC score
abovefbelow the age- and gender-specific
75th percentile)
Covariates: city and area of residence,
age, sex, education, smoking, ETS,
physical inactivity, waist-to-hip ratio,
diabetes, blood pressure, and lipids (and
household income in a subset)
Season: NA
Dose-response Investigated? Yes, PM
was also categorized into quartiles for
analyses
Statistical Package: NR
Pollutant: PM2.6 (/L/g|m3)
Averaging Time: One year (2002,
midpoint of the study)
Mean (SD): Total:
22.8(1.5)
High traffic exposure (£ 100m):
22.9(1.4)
Low traffic exposure (> 100m):
22.8(1.5)
Percentiles:
Q1: 21.54
Q2: 22.59
Q3: 23.75
10tl,-90"' percentile: 3.91
Range (Min, Max): NR
Monitoring Stations: Daily mean PM2.6
values for 2002 were estimated with the
EURAD model using data from official
emission inventories, meteorological
information, and regional topographical
data.
Copollutant (correlation): None
(Traffic was assessed using distance to
roadways)
Correlation between modeled daily
averages of PM2.6 and measured PM2.6:
0.86-0.88, depending on season.
PM Increment: 3.91 /yglm3 (10th-90th
percentile)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Percent change (95%CI) in CAC
associated with an increase in PM2.6
Unadjusted:
12.7(-7.0, 36.4)
Model 1 (adjusted for distance to major
road):
12.3 (-7.3, 35.9)
Model 2 (model 1 + city and area of
residence):
29.7 (0, 68.3)
Model 3 (model 2 + age, sex, education):
24.2(0, 55.1)
Model 4 (model 3 + smoking, ETS,
physical inactivity, waist-to-hip ratio):
17.9 (-5.3, 46.7)
Model 5 (model 4 + diabetes, blood
pressure, LDL, HDL, triglycerides):
17.2 (-5.6, 45.5)
Adjusted ORs (95%CI) for the
association between the top quarter
of PM exposure vs. the low quarter of
PM exposure and a CAC score above
the age- and sex-specific 75th
percentiles
All: 1.22 (0.96,1.54)
No CHD: 1.22 (0.95,1.57)
Men: 1.09(0.78,1.53)
Women: 1.34 (0.97,1.87)
Age < 60 yrs: 1.18 (0.83,1.68)
Age >60 yrs: 1.27 (0.93,1.75)
Nonsmokers: 1.17 (0.89,1.53)
Current smokers: 1.30 (0.83, 2.05)
Educational level
Low: 1.16 (0.86,1.57)
Medium: 1.30 (0.83, 2.05)
High: 1.62(0.81,3.25)
Additional notes:
No clear dose-response relationship
demonstrated when exposure assessed in
quartiles (Figure 2)
Participants who had not been working
full-time during the last 5 years showed
stronger effects, with possible dose-
response between PM2.5 and CAC (results
presented in Figure 3)
July 2009
E-482
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Hoffman et al. (2006,
091162)
Period of Study: Dec 2000—Jul 2003
Location: Ruhr area of Germany (2 large
cities: Essen, Mulheim)
Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10): Clinically
manifest CHD (defined as self-reported
history of a 'hard' coronary event, i.e.
myocardial infarction or application of a
coronary stent or angioplasty or bypass
surgery)
Age Groups: 45-75 years
Study Design: Cross-sectional (German
Heinz Nixdorf RBCALL study)
N: 3399 participants
Statistical Analyses: Multivariable
logistic regression
Covariates: sex, diabetes, hypertension,
smoking status, ETS, educational level,
physical activity, BMI, triglycerides, age,
cigarettes smoked per day, WHR, LDL,
HDL, HbAlc, indicator variable for cities,
indicator variable for living in northern
part of cities.
Statistical Package: SAS v8.2
Pollutant: PM2.6 (/L/g|m3)
Averaging Time: Yearly mean estimated
with model for year 2002 (on a spatial
scale of 5 km)
Mean (SD): Total: 23.3(1.4)
High traffic: 23.4 (1.4)
Low traffic: 23.3 (1.4)
Percentiles: NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant (correlation): None (Traffic
was assessed using distance to
roadways)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Model 1: PM2.6 + high traffic exposure
0.92 (0.36, 2.39)
Model 2: model 1 + age, sex
0.83(0.31,2.27)
Model 3: model 2 + education, diabetes,
HbAlc, BMI, WHR, smoking status, ETS,
physical activity, city, area of residence
0.56(0.16, 2.01)
Model 4: model 3 + hypertension, lipids
0.55(0.14,2.11)
Modeled vs. Measured: r - 0.86-0.88,
depending on season
Reference: Hoffmann et al, (2009,
190376)
Period of Study: 2000-2003
Location: Ruhr area, Germany
Outcome: Peripheral Arterial Di:
Study Design:
Covariates: height, weight, medication
use, diabetes, physical activity level,
smoking, socioeconomic status,
education, population density
Statistical Analysis: NR
Statistical Package: NR
Age Groups: 45-75 years
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: daily
Mean (SD) Unit: 22.96 (0.85)
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Increment: 3.91 |Jgfm3
Odds Ratio (95%CI) for prevalence of
peripheral arterial disease
0.87(0.57-1.34)
July 2009
E-483
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Kunzli et al. (2005, 087387)
Period of Study: 1998-2003
Location: Los Angeles Basin
Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10): Carotid
intima-media thickness (CIMT)
Age Groups: Less than 40 yrs excluded
mean age - 59.2 ± 9.8
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 798 participants
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression
Covariates: age, sex, education, income,
smoking, ETS, blood pressure, LDL
cholesterol, treatment with
antihypertensives or lipid-lowering
medications
Season: NA
Dose-response Investigated? Yes,
assessed PM2.6 in quartiles
Statistical Package: NR
Pollutant: PM2.6 (/L/g|m3)
Averaging Time: GIS/geostatics model
to estimate 'long-term mean ambient
concentrations of PM2.6' derived from
data collected in 2000, including data
from 23 state and local monitoring
stations.
Mean (SD): 20.3 ± 2.6
Percentiles: NR
Range (Min, Max): 5.2, 26.9
Monitoring Stations: 23 monitors
Copollutant (correlation): None
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Percent change (95%CI) in CIMT
associated with an increase in PM2.6
concentration
based on a linear model with log intima-
media thickness as dependent variable
Total population: Unadjusted: 5.9 (1.0,
10.9), p - 0.018
Adjusted for age, sex, education, income:
4.4 (0.0, 9.0), p - 0.056
Adjusted for above + smoking, ETS,
multivitamins, alcohol:
4.2(-0.2, 8.9), p - 0.064
Among Females > 60 years:
Unadjusted: 19.2 (8.8, 30.5), p - 0.001
Adjusted for age, sex, education, income:
15.7(5.7, 26.6), p - 0.002
Adjusted for above + smoking, ETS,
multivitamins, alcohol:
13.8(4.0, 24.5), p - 0.002
Among those taking lipid-lowering
therapy:
Unadjusted: 15.8 (2.1, 31.2), p - 0.024
Adjusted for age, sex, education, income:
13.3(0, 28.5), p - 0.031
Adjusted for above + smoking, ETS,
multivitamins, alcohol:
13.3(-0.3, 28.8), p - 0.060
For the observed contrast between
lowest and highest exposure:
Approximately 20/yg/ m3 ->12.1% (2.0-
231%) increase in CIMT.
Among nonsmokers: 6.6% (1.0-12.3%).
The estimate was small and not
significant in current and former smokers.
Women: In the range of 6-9% per
10/yg/m3
Unadjusted means of CIMT across
quartiles of exposure were 734, 753,
758, and 774 |Jm
adjusted means trend across exposure
groups, p - 0.041
stratified results presented in figures
Reference: Miller et al. (2007, 090130)
Period of Study: 1994-2003
Location: 36 US metropolitan areas
(Women's Health Initiative)
Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10): First
cardiovascular event (myocardial
infarction, coronary revascularization,
stroke, and death from either coronary
heart disease [categorized as "definite" or
"possible"] or cerebrovascular disease)
Age Groups: 50-79 years (median age at
enrollment: 63)
Study Design: Cohort (median follow-up
of 6 yrs)
Pollutant: PM2.6 (/L/g|m3)
Averaging Time: Annual avg
concentration in 2000 (used to represent
long-term exposure)
Mean (SD): Individual exposure: 13.5
(3.7)
Citywide avg exposure: 13.5 (3.3)
Median: 13.4
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Estimated Hazards Ratio (95%CI) for the
time to the first cardiovascular event or
death associated with an increase in
PM2.6
Any cardiovascular event (first event)
Overall: 1.24 (1.09,1.41)
July 2009
E-484
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
N: 65,893 postmenopausal women
without previous cardiovascular disease
Statistical Analyses: Cox-proportional
hazards regression
Covariates: age, race/ethnicity, smoking
status, the number of cigarettes smoked
per day, the number of years of smoking,
systolic blood pressure, education level,
household income, BMI, and presence or
absence of diabetes, hypertension, or
hypercholesterolemia (also evaluated
ETS, occupation, physical activity, diet,
alcohol consumption, waist circum-
ference, waist-to-hip ratio, medical
history, medications, and presence or
absence of a family history of cardiovas-
cular disease as possible confounders in
extended models)
Season: NA
Dose-response Investigated?
Statistical Package: SAS v8.0, STATA
v8.0
Percentiles: Quintile ranges:
1: 3.4,10.9
2: 11.0,12.4
3: 12.5,14.2
4: 14.3,16.4
5: 16.5, 28.3
IQR: 11.6-18.3
10",-90Bl
Personal: 9.1-18.3
City-wide: 9.3-17.8
Range (Min, Max): Personal exposure:
3.4, 28.3
Citywide exposure: 4.0,19.3
Monitoring Stations: 573 monitors
the nearest monitor to the location of
each residence was used to assign
exposure (monitor within 30 mi of
residence
median of 20 monitors per city (range: 4-
78))
Copollutant (correlation): PMio
SO?
NO?
CO
Os
Between cities: 1.15 (0.99,1.32)
Within cities: 1.64 (1.24,2.18)
Coronary heart disease (first event):
Overall: 1.21 (1.04,1.42)
Between cities: 1.13 (0.95,1.35)
Within cities: 1.56 (1.11,2.19)
Cerebrovascular disease (first event):
Overall: 1.35 (1.08,1.68); Between
cities: 1.20 (0.94,1.54)
Within cities: 2.08 (1.28,3.40)
Ml (first event): Overall: 1.06 (0.85,1.34)
Between cities: 0.97 (0.75,1.25)
Within cities: 1.52 (0.91, 2.51)
Coronary revascularization (first event):
Overall: 1.20 (1.00,1.43)
Between cities: 1.14 (0.93,1.39)
Within cities: 1.45 (0.98, 2.16)
Stroke (first event): Overall: 1.28 (1.02,
1.61)
Between cities: 1.12 (0.87,1.45)
Within cities: 2.08 (1.25,3.48)
Any death from cardiovascular cause:
Overall: 1.76(1.25,2.47)
Between cities: 1.63 (1.10, 2.40)
Within cities: 2.28 (1.10, 4.75)
Coronary heart disease death (definite
diagnosis): Overall: 2.21 (1.17,4.16)
Between cities: 2.22 (1.06,4.62)
Within cities: 2.17 (0.60, 7.89)
Coronary heart disease death (possible
diagnosis): Overall: 1.26 (0.62, 2.56)
Between cities: 1.20 (0.54, 2.63)
Within cities: 1.57 (0.29, 8.51)
Cerebrovascular disease death: Overall:
1.83(1.11,3.00)
Between cities: 1.58 (0.90, 2.78)
Within cities: 2.93 (1.03, 8.38)
Estimated Hazard Ratios for
cardiovascular events associated with an
increase in PM2.6 according to selected
characteristics (presented adjusted H and
adjusted H including adjustment for city)
Any cardiovascular event: H: 1.24 (1.09,
1.41)
H (city): 1.69 (1.26,2.27)
Household income < $20,000: H: 1.30
(1.10,1.53)
H (city): 1.75(1.28,2.40)
Household income $20,000-49,999: H:
1.23(1.08,1.41)
H (city): 1.69 (1.25,2.27)
Household income a $50,000: H: 1.20
July 2009
E-485
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
(1.02,1.40)
6
H (city): 1.66 (1.22,2.26)
P for trend: HR: p - 0.34
HR (city): p - 0.54
Education: Not high-school graduate: H:
1.40 (1.11,1.75)
H (city): 1.88 (1.32,2.67)
Education: High school grad/trade
school/GED: H: 1.33 (1.14,1.55)
H (city): 1.79(1.32,2.44)
Education: Some college or associate
degree: H: 1.26(1.09,1.44)
H (city): 1.74 (1.29,2.34)
Education: Bachelor's degree or higher: H:
1.11 (0.94,1.31)
H (city): 1.54 (1.13,2.10)
P for trend: H: p - 0.07
H (city): p - 0.15
Age < 60 yr: H: 1.21 (0.84,1.73)
H (city): 1.66 (1.05,2.61)
Age 60-69 yr: H: 1.14 (0.93,1.39)
H (city): 1.53 (1.09,2.14)
Age > 70 yr: H: 1.34 (1.11,1.63)
H (city): 1.85 (1.34,2.56)
P for trend: H: p - 0.20
H (city): p - 0.20
Current smoker: H: 1.68 (1.06, 2.66)
H (city): 2.28 (1.33,3.92)
Former smoker: H: 1.24 (1.01,1.52)
H (city): 1.71 (1.23,2.39)
Never smoked: H: 1.18 (0.99,1.40)
H (city): 1.60 (1.16,2.21)
Living with smoker currently: H: 1.28
(0.84,1.97)
H (city): 1.65 (0.99,2.76)
Living with smoker formerly: H: 1.18
(1.00,1.38)
H (city): 1.59 (1.16,2.16)
Living with smoker never: H: 1.39 (1.07,
1.80)
H (city): 1.90 (1.31,2.78)
BMI <22.5: H: 0.99 (0.80,1.21)
H (city): 1.35 (0.96,1.88)
BMI 22.5-24.7: H: 1.16(0.96,1.40)
H (city): 1.58 (1.14,2.19)
BMI 24.8-27.2: H: 1.24(1.05,1.45)
H (city): 1.69 (1.24,2.30)
July 2009
E-486
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
BMI 27.3-30.9: H: 1.38(1.18,1.61)
H (city): 1.88 (1.38,2.56)
BMI >30.9: H: 1.35 (1.12,1.64)
H (city): 1.84 (1.33,2.55)
P for trend: H: p - 0.003
H (city): p - 0.007
Waist-to-hip ratio < 0.74: H: 1.07 (0.90,
1.29)
H (city): 1.45 (1.05,2.00)
Waist-to-hip ratio 0.74-0.77: H: 1.12
(0.95,1.31)
H (city): 1.51 (1.11,2.06)
Waist-to-hip ratio 0.78-0.80: H: 1.24
(1.07,1.44)
H (city): 1.68 (1.23,2.27)
Waist-to-hip ratio 0.81-0.86: H: 1.30
(1.13.1.50)
H (city): 1.76(1.30,2.38)
Waist-to-hip ratio >0.86: H: 1.29 (1.11,
1.50)
H (city): 1.75(1.29,2.37)
Waist circumference < 73 cm: H: 1.05
(0.86,1.27)
H (city): 1.43 (1.02,1.99)
Waist circumference 73-78 cm: H: 1.20
(1.02,1.41)
H (city): 1.63 (1.19,2.23)
Waist circumference 79-85 cm: H: 1.22
(1.05,1.41)
H (city): 1.66 (1.22,2.24)
Waist circumference 86-95 cm: H: 1.33
(1.15,1.53)
H (city): 1.80 (1.33,2.43)
Waist circumference >95 cm: H: 1.27
(1.07.1.51)
H (city): 1.73(1.26,2.36)
P for trend: H: p - 0.06
H (city): p - 0.07
Hormone-replacement therapy-Current
Use: H: 1.33 (1.09,1.61)
H (city): 1.85 (1.32,2.58)
Hormone-replacement therapy-No Current
Use: H: 1.16 (0.98,1.39)
H (city): 1.57 (1.14,2.17)
Diabetes-yes: H: 0.96 (0.67,1.37)
H (city): 1.24 (0.78,1.96)
Diabetes-no: H: 1.28 (1.12,1.47)
H (city): 1.75(1.30,2.36)
Hypertension-yes: H: 1.22 (1.02,1.45)
H (city): 1.65 (1.09,2.27)
July 2009
E-487
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Hypertension-no: H: 1.26 (1.05,1.51)
H (city): 1.74 (1.25,2.40)
Hypercholesterolemia-yes: H: 1.25 (0.94,
1.67)
H (city): 1.71 (1.15,2.54)
Hypercholesterolemia-no: H: 1.23 (1.07,
1.42)
H (city): 1.69 (1.25,2.28)
Family history of CVD- yes: H: 1.30
(1.12,1.51)
H (city): 1.80 (1.32,2.44)
Family history of CVD- no: H: 1.07 (0.83,
1.37)
H (city): 1.46 (1.00,2.12)
Time lived in current state: a 20 yr: H:
1.21 (1.06,1.39)
H (city): 1.66 (1.23,2.23)
Time lived in current state: 10-19 yr: H:
1.39(1.12,1.72)'H (city): 1.97 (1.40,
2.79)
Time lived in current state: £ 9 yr: H:
1.54 (1.06,2.26)
H (city): 2.24 (1.39,3.59)
Health insurance coverage-yes: H: 1.22
(1.07,1.39)
H (city): 1.71 (1.27,2.30)
Health insurance coverage-no: H: 1.82
(0.81,4.10)
H (city): 2.65 (1.12,6.28)
Time spent outdoors: < 30 min: H: 1.09
(0.86,1.39)
H (city): 1.56 (1.05,2.31)
Time spent outdoors: a 30 min
H: 1.26(1.05,1.50)
H (city): 1.82 (1.29,2.57)
July 2009
E-488
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: O'Neill et al. (2007,156006)
Period of Study: 2000-2004
Location: USA (6 field centers:
Baltimore, MD
Chicago, IL
Forsyth Co, NC
Los Angeles, CA
New York, NY
St. Paul, MN
Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10): Creatinine
adjusted urinary albumin excretion
Assessed 2 ways: continuous log urinary
albumin/creatine ration (UACR) and
clinically defined micro- or macro-
albuminuria (UACR a 25 mg/g) versus
normal levels
Age Groups: 44-84 yrs
Study Design: Prospective cohort
analyses (MESA cohort)
N: 3901 participants, free of clinical CVD
at baseline
Statistical Analyses: Multiple linear
regression (continuous outcome)
binomial regression (dichotomous
outcome)
Covariates: age, gender, race, BMI,
cigarette status, ETS, percent dietary
protein
Season: NA
Dose-response Investigated? Yes,
examined quartiles of exposure
Statistical Package: SAS
Pollutant: PM2.6 (/L/g|m3)
Averaging Time: avg of previous month,
avg of previous 2 months (recent
exposures)
20-yr imputed PM2.6avg (longer-term
exposures)
Mean (SD): Previous month:
16.5(4.8)
Percentiles: NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Monitoring Stations: NR (used closest
monitor to residence to assign value for
recent exposures
20 year PM2.6 exposures were imputed
using a space-time model.)
Copollutant (correlation): PM10
PM Increment: 10 //g|m3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Adjusted mean differences in log
UACR (mg/g) per increase in PM2.5
among participants seen at baseline
Previous 30 days
Full sample:-0.017 (-0.087, 0.052)
Within 10 km: 0.026 (-0.067,0.119)
Previous 60 days
Full sample:-0.040 (-0.121, 0.042)
Within 10 km: -0.013 (-0.122, 0.097)
Imputed 20 yr exposure
Full sample: 0.002 (-0.048, 0.052)
Within 10 km:-0.012 (-0.076, 0.053)
Adjusted relative prevalence of
microalbuminuria vs high-normal and
normal levels (below 25 mg/g) per
increase in PM2.6 among participants
without macroalbuminuria during the
baseline visit
Previous 30 days: 0.94 (0.77,1.16)
Previous 60 days: 0.90 (0.71,1.14)
Imputed 20 yr exposure: 0.98 (0.84,
1.14)
Reference: Solomon et al. (2003,
156994)
Period of Study: Exposures measures
1966-1969
Health endpoints assessed via
questionnaire, year not reported but
apparently 30 years after exposure
assessment (given the 30 yr residency
requirement)
Location: United Kingdom
Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10): Ischemic
heart disease (a self-reported history of
medically diagnosed angina or heart
attack)
Age Groups: 45 yrs and older
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 1,166 women
Statistical Analyses: Log linear
modeling
Covariates: smoking, passive smoking in
childhood, tenancy, social class, worked
in industry with respiratory hazard,
childhood hospital admission for chest
problem, diabetes, BMI
Season: NA
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: STATA
Pollutant: Black smoke (/L/g|m3)
Averaging Time: Exposure measures
performed 1966-1969
women had to live within 5 miles of their
current address for the past 30 years to
be included
Mean (SD): 11 wards with pollution
measures were categorized into high
(mean >120 //g/m3) and low (mean
< 50 //g/m3) exposure categories when
classified according to their black smoke
levels during 1966-69
SD not reported
Percentiles: NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant (correlation): SO2 (health
results not presented)
PM Increment: Categorical
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Association of particulate pollution in
place of residence and ischemic heart
disease
Low (ref): 1.0
High: 1.0(0.7,1.4)
All units expressed in uillm unless otherwise specified.
July 2009
E-489
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
E.5. Long-Term Exposure and Respiratory Outcomes
Table E-22. Long-term exposure - respiratory morbidity outcomes - PM10.
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ackermann-Liebrich et al.
(1997,077537)
Period of Study: 1991-1993
Location: Switzerland (Aarau, Basel,
Davos, Geneva, Lugano, Montana,
Payerne, Wald)
Outcome: Pulmonary function
Age Groups: 18-60 yrs
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 9651 people
Statistical Analyses: Regression
analysis
Covariates: Age, sex, height, weight,
education level, nationality, workplace
exposure
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: Continuously
measured, 12 mo. avg. used
Mean (SD): 21.2 (7.4)
Range: (10.1-33.4)
Copollutant (correlation): SO2: r ¦
NO2: r - 0.91
O3: r - -0.55
Summer Daytime O3:
r - 0.31
Excess O3: r - 0.67
Altitude: r - -0.77
0.93
PM Increment: 10/yglm3
Regression Coefficient fB (Lower CI,
Upper CI) for air pollutants as predictors
of pulmonary function
FVC: -0.0345 (-0.0407 to -0.0283)
p< 0.001
FEVi: -0.0160 (-0.0225 to -0.0095)
p< 0.001
Percent Change (Lower CI, Upper CI)
associated with increase in avg annual air
pollution concentration
Healthy Never-smokers
FVC: -3.39
p< 0.001
FEVi:-1.59
p< 0.001
All Never-smokers
FVC: -3.14
p< 0.001
FEVi:-1.06
p< 0.001
Former Smokers
FVC: -3.03
p< 0.001
FEVi: -0.42
Current Smokers
FVC: -3.21
p< 0.001
FEVi:-1.35
p< 0.001
All
FVC: -3.14
p< 0.001
FEVi:-1.03
p< 0.001
Long-term Residents
FVC:-3.16
p< 0.001
FEVi: -0.96
p< 0.001
July 2009
E-490
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Avol et al. (2001, 020552)
Period of Study: 1993-1998
Location: Southern California
Outcome: FVC, FEVi, MMEF, PEFR
Age Groups: 10 yrs
Study Design: cohort
N: 110
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression
Covariates: Sex, race, cohort entry year,
annual avg change in height, weight, BMI
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h PMio averag
over 1994
Mean (SD): 15.0-66.2
PM Increment: 10/yglm3
Mean Change (Lower CI, Upper CI)
FVC:-1.8 (-9.1, 5.5)
FEVi:-6.6 (-13.5, 0.3)
MMEF:-16.6 (-32.1 to-1.1)
PEFR:-34.9 (-59.8 to-10.0)
Reference: Bayer-Oglesby et al. (2005,
086245)
Period of Study: 1992-2001
Location: Switzerland (Lugano, Zurich,
Bern, Geneva, Anieres, Biel, Langnau,
Payerne, & Montana)
Outcome: Respiratory symptoms (chronic
cough, bronchitis, cold, dry cough,
conjunctivitis, wheeze, sneezing, asthma,
& hay fever)
Age Groups: 6-15 yrs
Study Design: cross-sectional
N: 9,591 children
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression models
Covariates: age, sex, nationality,
parental education, number of siblings,
farming status, low birth weight, breast
feeding, smoking, family history of
asthma, bronchitis and/or atopy, mother
who smokes, indoor humidity, mode of
cooking & heating, carpeting, pets,
removal of carpets/pets for health
reasons, completed questionnaire &
month, days max temperature < 0°C,
mother's belief of association between
environmental exposures & respiratory
health
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: STATA
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 12 month avg
Mean (SD): NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Monitoring Stations: 9
Copollutant (correlation): NR
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3
"Figure 2 shows that declining levels of
PMio were associated with declining
prevalence of chronic cough, bronchitis,
common cold, nocturnal dry cough, and
conjunctivitis symptoms. For wheezing,
sneezing, asthma, and hay fever, no
significant association could be seen with
declining PMio levels."
"Figure 3 illustrates that, on an aggregate
level, across regions the mean change in
PMio levels (r pearson - 0.81,
p - 0.008). The strongest decline of
adjusted prevalence of nocturnal dry
cough was observed in Geneva, Lugano,
and Anieres, where the strongest
reduction of PMio had also been
achieved."
Reference: Burret al. (2004, 087809)
Period of Study: 3 weeks in July and
Jan 1997 and 2 weeks in Nov 1996 and
April 1997
Location: North Wales, England
Outcome: Self-report of symptoms only
for wheeze, cough, phlegm, rhinitis, and
itchy eyes.
Age Groups: all
Study Design: Repeated measures
N: 386 persons in congested streets and
425 in the uncongested streets in
199611997. Of these, 165 and 283
completed the second phase of the study.
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: Mean hourly
concentrations
Mean (SD): SD NR
Congested streets -
1996-97 35.2
1998-99 27.2
Uncongested Streets
1996-97 11.6
1998-99 8.2
Monitoring Stations: 1 in con
street and 1 in uncongested
Percent change PMio in congested
streets: 22.7
Percent change PMio in uncongested
streets: 28.9
Uncongested street sampling site was 20
m from the congested street sampler.
The opening of the by-pass produced a
reduction in pollution in the congested
streets. The health effects of these
changed is likely to be greater for nasal
and ocular symptoms than for lower
respiratory symptoms. Uncertainty about
the causality arises from low response
rates and conflicting trends in respiratory
and nasal symptoms.
July 2009
E-491
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Calderon-Garciduenas et al.
(2006,091253)
Period of Study: 1999, 2000
Location: Southwest Mexico City &
Tlaxcala, Mexico
Outcome: Hyperinflation, interstitial
markings-measured by chest radiograph,
and lung function-FVC, FEVi, PEF,
FEF25-75, measured using spirometry
tests
Age Groups: 5-13 yrs
Study Design: Cohort
N: 249 (total), 230 (Southwest Mexico
City), 19 (Tlaxcala)
Statistical Analyses: Bayes test,
Spearman rank correlation, multiple
regression
Covariates: /
e, sex
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS 8.2
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 1 yr
Mean (SD):
Mexico City
1999-48
2000-45
Tlaxacala:
1994-2000: < NAAQS std
Monitoring Stations: Southwest
Mexico City—2
Tlxacala-periodic air monitoring data
Copollutant: 0:i
PM Increment: NR
% Change:
% of children with FEVi < 80% expected
value:
Mexico City (n - 77): 7.8%
Tlaxacala (n - 19): 0%
% children with hyperinflation: Mexico
City: 65.6%
No hyperinflation: 79
Mild: 72
Moderate: 56
Severe: 23
Tlaxacala: 5.3%
No hyperinflation: 18
Mild: 1
Moderate: 0
Severe: 0
% children with interstitial markings:
Mexico City: 52.6%
Number with:
No interstitial markings: 19
Mild: 0
Moderate: 0
Severe: 0
Tlaxacala: 0%
No interstitial markings: 109
Mild: 112
Moderate: 9
Severe: 0
Reference: Calderon-Garciduenas, et al.
(2003,156316)
Period of Study: Jan 1999-Jun 2000
Location: Mexico City, Tuxpam, and
Tlaxcala, Mexico
Outcome: Respiratory system changes
Age Groups: 5-17 yrs
Study Design: Case-control of subjects
examined for this study
N: 174 cases, 27 controls, children
Statistical Analyses: Chi-square test
with Yates correction, Spearman's rank
correlation test.
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS 8.2
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 12 h (daytime 08: 00-
20: 00) and nighttime (20: 00-08: 00)
Mean (SD): Mexico City
~ay/Night
Jan-Jun 1999 76.0/50.0
Jul-Dec 1999 42.8122.5
Jan-Jun 2000 75.2147.5
Daily ambient exposure of children to a
complex mixture of air pollutants
produces significant chest X-ray
abnormalities, a decrease in predicted
values of FEF25-75, FEF75, and the
FEVilFVC ratio in association with
interstitial marking on chest X-rays, a
mild restrictive pattern by spirometry,
peripheral blood abnormalities, and an
imbalance of serum cytokines.
July 2009
E-492
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Cavanagh et al. (2007,
098618)
Period of Study: Mar-Aug 2004
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Outcome: A clinical study of excretion of
1 -hydroypyrene (1-0HP) as a marker of
PAH exposure
Age Groups: non smoking males aged
12-18 yr
Study Design: Comparison of 2 high
pollution events and 2 low pollution
events
N: 89 male students in a boarding school
Statistical Analyses: Wilcoxon signed
rank test for paired observations, Mann-
Whitney U test
Season: Winter
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD):
Autumn Low
Outdoor 19 Indoor NA
Winter I
Outdoor 43 Indoor 38
Winter II
Outdoor 72 Indoor 84
Winter Low
Outdoor 12 Indoor 16
Monitoring Stations: One inside the
boarding house, and one outside
Urinary 1-0HP were raised after high-
pollutions events. Peaks were slightly
higher than for US non-smokers of similar
ages and slightly lower than for German
non-smokers of similar ages. Urinary 1-
0HP was slightly higher in asthmatics
compared to non-asthmatics.
There were no indoor sources of PAHs
(wood-burning stoves, tobacco smoke).
Diet is another source of PAHs, but all
students ate in the boarding house.
These results suggest 1-OHP could be
used as a biomarker of ambient air
pollution.
Reference: Downs et al. (2007, 092853) Outcome: FEVi, FEVi as % of FVC,
FEF25-75
Period of Study: 1991, 2002
Age Groups: 18-60 years
Location: Switzerland
Study Design: Prospective Cohort
N: 4742 people
Statistical Analyses: Linear random
effects models
Covariates: Age, sex, height, parental
smoking, season, education, nationality,
occupational exposure, smoking (status,
pack-years), atopy, BMI
Dose-response Investigated? Yes-
linear fit best
Statistical Package: SAS 9.1, STATA
8.2, R 2.4
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: Annual
Mean: Mean interval exposure: 238
/yg/m3lyears
Percentiles: 25th: 197
75th: 287
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3 reduction in
annual mean
Percent I absolute reduction in annual
decline in lung function over 11-year
period (95% CI):
Annual decline in FEVi reduced by 9% I
3.1 mL (0.03-6.2)
Annual decline in FEF2E-7E reduced by 16%
111.3 mL/second (4.3-18.2)
Annual decline in FEVi as a
percentage of FVC of 0.06 (0.01-0.12)
A reduction in interval exposure of 109
|jg per m3 cubic meter-years (equivalent
to a reduction of 10 |Jgfm3 in the annual
avg during the mean follow-up time of
10.9 years) was associated with:
A reduction of 6.9 mL (95% CI, 2.1 to
11.7) in the annual decline in FEVi
A 22% reduction in the annual decline in
FEF26-76 (i.e., by 14.0 mL per second
95% CI, 3.1 to 24.8)
July 2009
E-493
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Gauderman et al. (2000,
012531)
Period of Study: 1993-1997
Location: Southern California
Outcome: FVC, FEVi, MMEF, FEFjb
Age Groups: fourth, seventh, or tenth
Study Design: cohort
N: 3035 subjects
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression
Covariates: Height, weight, BMI,
asthma, smoking, exercise, room
temperature, barometric pressure
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: SAS
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h avg PMio
Mean (SD): PMio 51.5
Copollutant (correlation): PM2.6
r - 0.96
0s r - -0.32
PMio-2.5 r - 0.92
NO? r - 0.65
Inorg. Acid r - 0.68
PMio Increment: 51.5/yg/m3
% Change (Lower CI, Upper CI)
PMio-4th grade
FVC-0.58 (-1.14 to-0.02)
FEVi-0.85 (-1.59 to-0.10)
MMEF-1.32 (-2.43 to-0.20)
FEF75-1.63 (-3.14 to -0.11)
PMio-7th grade
FVC-0.45 (-1.03, 0.13)
FEVi-0.44 (-1.10, 0.23)
MMEF-0.48 (-2.51,1.59)
FEFjb -0.50 (-2.26,1.29)
PMio-10th grade
FVC 0.07 (-0.99,1.13)
FEVi-0.46 (-1.84, 0.94)
MMEF-0.71 (-4.87,3.63)
FEF7B-1.54 (-5.61, 2.71)
Reference: Gauderman et al. (2002,
026013)
Period of Study: 1996-2000
Location: Southern California
Outcome: Lung function development:
FEVi, maximal midexpiratory flow
(MMEF)
Age Groups: Fourth grade children (avg
age - 9.9 yrs)
Study Design: Cohort study
N: 1678 children, 12 communities
Statistical Analyses: Mixed model
linear regression
Covariates: Height, BMI, doctor-
diagnosed asthma and cigarette smoking
in previous year, respiratory illness and
exercise on day of test, interaction of
each of these variables with sex,
barometric pressure, temperature at test
time, indicator variables for field
technician and spirometer
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: SAS (10)
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: Annual 24 h averages
Mean (SD): The avg levels were
presented in an online data supplement
(Figure E1)
Monitoring Stations: 12
Copollutant (correlation): O3 (10 AM to
6 PM) r - 0.13
0s r - -0.37
NO? r - 0.64
Acid vapor r - 0.79
PM2.6 r - 0.95
PMio-2.5 r - 0.95
EC r - 0.86
0C r - 0.97
PM Increment: 51.5/yg/m3
Association Estimate:
None of the pulmonary function tests had
a statistically significant correlation with
PMio
FEVi r - -0.12 p - 0.63
MMEF r - -0.22 p - 0.30
July 2009
E-494
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Gauderman et al. (2004,
056569)
Period of Study: Air pollution data
ascertainment: 1994-2000. Spirometry
testing: spring 2001- spring 2003
Location: 12 Communities in Southern
California
Outcome: Lung function
FVC, FEVi, MMEF (Maximal
midexpiratory flow rate)
Age Groups: Children, Avg age 10 years
Study Design: Prospective Cohort Study
N: 12 Communities
2,034 Children
24,972 child-months
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression
of changes in sex-and-community specific
lung growth function and PM
Covariates: Random effect for
communities
Season: ALL (except for PM2.6)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h measurements
over each year used to create annual avg
Mean: Means are presented in figures
only.
Range (Min, Max): —15, —65
Monitoring Stations: 12
Copollutant (correlation):
0s:r - 0.18
NO?: r - 0.67
PM2.6: r - 0.95
EC: r - 0.85
0C:r - 0.97
PM Increment: Most to least polluted
community Range:
PM10: 51.4/yg/m3
EC: 1.2/yg/m3
0C: 10.5/yg|m3
Difference in Lung Growth [Lower CI,
Upper CI];
FVC-60.2 (-190.6 to 70.3)
FEVi-82.1 (-176.9 to 12.8)
MMEF-154.2 (-378.3 to 69.8)
EC:
FVC -77.7 (-166.7 to 11.3)
FEVi-87.9 (-146.4 to-29.4)
MMEF-165.5 (-323.4 to-7.6)
0C:
FVC-58.6 (-196.1 to 78.8)
FEVi-86.2 (-185.6 to 13.3)
MMEF -151.2 (-389.4 to 87.1)
Correlation with % below 80% predicted
Lung function (p-value)
PM10: 0.66(0.02)
EC: 0.74 (0.006)
Reference: Gauderman et al. (2007,
090121)
Period of Study: 1993-2004
Location: 12 Southern California
Communities
Outcome: pulmonary function tests FVC, Pollutant: PM10
FEVi, MMEF/FEF26.76
Age Groups: Children (mean age 10 at
recruitment, followed for 8 years)
Study Design: Cohort Study (Children's
Health Study)
N: 3677 children
(1718 in cohort 1 recruited 1993 and
1959 in cohort 2 recruited 1996)
22686 pulmonary function tests.
Statistical Analyses: Hierarchical mixed
effects model with linear splines
Covariates: Adjustments for height,
height squared, BMI, BMI squared,
present asthma status, exercise or
respiratory illness on day of test, smoking
in previous year, field technician, traffic
indicator (distance from freeway,
distance from major roads), random
effects for participant and community.
Dose-response Investigated? no
Statistical Package: SAS
Monitoring Stations: 1 in each
community
PM Increment: 51.4/yg/m3
Pollutant effect reported as difference in
8 year lung function growth from least to
most polluted community. Negative
difference indicates growth deficits
associated with exposure. For PM10 FEV
growth deficit is -111
July 2009
E-495
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Goss et al. (2004, 055624)
Period of Study: 1999-2000
Location: USA
Outcome: Cystic Fibrosis pulmonary
exacerbations, FEVi
Age Groups: > 6
Study Design: cohort
N: 11484 patients
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression, t-tests, Mann-Whitney tests,
Chi-squared tests, polytomous regression,
multiple linear regression
Covariates: Age, sex, lung function,
weight, insurance status, pancreatic
insufficiency, airway colonization,
genotype, median household income by
census tract, zipcode.
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: STATA, SAS
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: annual mean of 24 h
averages
Mean (SD): 24.8(7.8) mglm3
Percentiles: 25th: 20.3
50th(Median): 24.0
75th: 28.9
Monitoring Stations: 626
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Odds Ratio Estimate [Lower CI, Upper
CI]:
Odds of having 2 or more pulmonary
exacerbations as compared to 1 or less in
2000
1.08(1.02-1.15)
Odds of having 2 or more pulmonary
exacerbations as compared to no
exacerbations in 2000
1.09(1.02-1.17)
Decrease in FEVi 38ml(18-58)
Reference: Hanigan et al, (2008,
156518)
Period of Study: Fire Season (April-
November) from 1996-2005
Location: Darwin, Australia
Outcome: Respiratory admissions
Study Design: time-series
Covariates: Race, age
Statistical Analysis: Over-dispersed
Poisson generalized linear models
Statistical Package: R
Age Groups: All
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: Daily levels estimated
from visibility data
Mean Unit: "Only reported for 2005*
15.31 /yglm3
Range (Min, Max): 6.93, 31.12
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Percent Increase (95% CI)
"Full results reported visually in Figure 3*
Total Respiratory Admissions
4.81 % (-1.04-11.01)
Indigenous Respiratory Admissions, No
Lag
9.40% (1.04-18.46)
Non-Indigenous Respiratory Admissions,
No Lag
3.14% (-2.99-9.66)
Indigenous Respiratory Admissions, Lag 3
15.02% (3.73-27.54)
Non-Indigenous Respiratory Admissions,
Lag 3
0.67% (-7.55-9.61)
Indigenous Asthma Admissions, Lag 1
16.27% (3.55-40.17)
Non-Indigenous Asthma Admissions, Lag
1
8.54% (-5.60-24.80)
July 2009
E-496
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ho et al. (2007, 093265)
Period of Study: Oct 1995-Mar 1996
Location: Taiwan, Republic of China
Outcome: Asthma
Age Groups: 10-17 yrs
Study Design: Screened junior high
students for asthma, collected
meteorological data to determine the
relationship.
N: 69,367
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression model, the maximum likelihood
estimation with Fisher's scoring
algorithm, stepwise regression model,
Wald statistic, Akaike criteria. GEE,
GENMOD
Covariates: Wind, barometric pressure,
temperature, rain, humidity
Season: Fall-spring
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: Monthly
Monitoring Stations: 72
Odds Ratio from stepwise regression
model:
Females (n - 32, 648)
0.993 [0.990-0.997]
Males: NS
Higher PMio concentration resulted in
less asthma prevalence. However, a
higher number of rain days seemed to
reduce asthma prevalence
rain days might interact with PMio.
Reference: Hong et al. (2004,156565)
Period of Study: 2001
Location: Kerinci, SP7, and Pelalawan,
Indonesia
Outcome: Respiratory symptoms
Age Groups: < 12 yrs
Study Design: Disproportionate random
sampling was used to select 100
households from each village. An
interviewer interviewed all children
through the caregiver/parent to obtain
symptoms in the past 2 weeks (cough,
cold, phlegm) and the last 12 months.
N: 382 children
Statistical Analyses: Chi-square test,
analysis of variance, prevalence rates,
adjusted odds ratios, multivariate
adjusted odds ratios from multiple logistic
regression models, allowing for
clustering.
Covariates: Age, gender, no. of children
in household, household income, floor
area of house, fuel for cooking, no. of
smokers in household, personal and
family medical history.
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SPSS STATA v.7
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h measurements
were taken daily from 2
weeks before the field survey to 1 month
after the survey
Mean (SD): Kerinci 102.9 (49.6)/yg/m3
SP7 73.7 (41.7)
Pelalawan 26.1 (14.5)
P< 0.01
Range (Min, Max):
Kerinci 25,184
SP7 13,138
Pelalawan 10, 66
Monitoring Stations: 3
PM Increment: Low (Pelalawan),
Medium (SP7), & High (Kerinci) PM
Exposure
Odds Ratios (95% CI) for Symptoms by
village:
Cough/cold past 2 wks
Pelalawan 1.00
SP7 2.03(1.04,3.96)
Kerinci 3.17 (1.43, 7.07)
Respiratory symptoms last 12 months
Pelalawan 1.00
SP7 1.15(0.58, 2.26)
Kerinci 1.42 (0.62, 3.25)
Ever had rhinitis wfo flu
Pelalawan 1.00
SP7 2.17(0.57, 8.29)
Kerinci 0.56 (0.11,2.83)
Ever had wheezing
Pelalawan 1.00
SP7 0.85 (0.35, 2.08)
Kerinci 1.18 (0.46, 3.01)
Reference: Horak et al. (2002, 034792) Outcome:
Period of Study: 1994-1997
Location: Lower Austria
Lung function growth measured by
changes in: 1. FVC (forced vital capacity)
2. FEVi
3. MEF21, -/!, (midexpiratory flow between
25-75% of the forced vital capacity)
Age Groups: 2-3 grade schoolchildren
(mean age - 8)
Study Design: Prospective cohort with
repeated measures
N: 975 children
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression
GEE, nonstationary M-dependent
correlation structure
Pollutant: PMio
Mean (SD): Winter: 21.0 (4.8)
summer: 17.4 (2.8)
Range (Min, Max):
Winter: 9.4-30.5
summer: 11.7-28.9
Monitoring Stations:
NR, stations were located in the
immediate vicinity of each of the 8
elementary schools
Copollutant (correlation): Winter
0a: (r - -0.581)
PM Increment: 1 /yglm3
Mean per unit increase in PM (p-value)
Outcome: difference per day of FVC
(mL/day)
Summer: 0.001 (0.938)
Winter: 0.008 (0.042)
Controlling for temperature:
Summer: -0.007 (0.417)
Winter: -0.003 (0.599)
Controlling for O3:
Summer: 0.001 (0.911)
July 2009
E-497
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Covariates: Gender, atopy, ETS
SO? (r - 0.520)
Winter: 0.010(0.019)
exposure, baseline lung function, first
NO? (r - 0.595)
Controlling for NO2:
height, height difference, school site
Season: Winter, summer
summer
Summer: -0.018 (0.056)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Os (r - -0.429)
Winter: 0.015(0.000)
SO? (r - 0.335)
Controlling for SO2:
NO? (r - 0.412)
Summer: 0.005 (0.575)
Winter: 0.004 (0.492)
In non-asthmatic children:
Summer: -0.003 (0.710)
Winter: 0.009 (0.030)
In group not exposed to ETS:
Summer: 0.014 (0.154)
Winter: 0.012(0.0018)
In group exposed to ETS:
Summer: 0.022 (0.088)
Winter: 0.003 (0.656)
Outcome: difference per day of FEVi
(mL/day)
Summer: -0.023 (0.003)
Winter: 0.001 (0.885)
Controlling for temperature:
Summer: -0.034 (0.000)
Winter: -0.011 (0.016)
Controlling for O3:
Summer: -0.022 (0.008)
Winter: 0.004 (0.338)
Controlling for NO2:
Summer: -0.038 (0.000)
Winter: 0.011 (0.005)
Controlling for SO2:
Summer: -0.022 (0.010)
Winter: -0.005 (0.358)
Outcome: difference per day MEF25-75
(mL/day)
Summer: -0.090 (0.000)
Winter: -0.008 (0.395)
Controlling for temperature:
Summer: -0.112 (0.000)
Winter: -0.013 (0.295)
Controlling for O3:
Summer: -0.087 (0.000)
Winter: -0.008 (0.434)
Controlling for NO2:
Summer: -0.102 (0.000)
Winter: 0.005 (0.610)
Controlling for SO2:
July 2009
E-498
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Summer: -0.095 (0.000)
Winter:-0.011 (0.474)
Reference: Hwang et al. (2006, 088971) Outcome: Peak expiratory flow rate
(PEFR), Forced Expiratory Volume in 1
Period of Study: 2001
Location: Taiwan
second (FEVi), Forced Vital Capacity
(FVC), Self reported "frequent coughing,"
Self reported "shortness of breath," Self
reported " irritation of respiratory tract"
Age Groups: 24-55 years (mean - 40)
Study Design: Cohort
N: 120 men (60 traffic policemen and 60
controls)
Statistical Analyses: AN0VA, odds
ratios calculated from 2X2 table
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: PMio
Mean (SD): 55.58 (16.57)
Percentiles: 25th: 42.96
50th(Median): 53.81
75th: 70.37
Range (Min, Max): 29.36, 99.58
Monitoring Stations: 22
Copollutant (correlation): NOx
(r - 0.34)
SO? (r - 0.58)
CO (r - 0.27)
0s (r - 0.28)
PM Increment: 10//g/m3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
Single pollutant model: 1.00 [0.99,1.02]
Controlling for NOx: 0.99 [0.97,1.00]
Controlling for CO: 1.00 [0.99,1.01]
Controlling for O3:1.00 [0.99,1.02]
Reference: Hwang et al, (2008,134420)
Outcome: Oral Cleft
Pollutant: PM10
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Period of Study: 2001-2003
Study Design: Case-control
Averaging Time: hourly
Odds Ratio (Min CI, Max CI);
Location: Taiwan
Covariates: Maternal age, plurality,
Mean (SD) Unit:
Single Pollutant Model
gestational age, population density and
Average: 54.83 ± 13.07 //g/m3
Month 1: 1.01 (0.96-1.06)
season of conception
Statistical Analysis: logistic regression
Spring: 64.44 ± 16.21 //g/m3
Month 2: 1.00 (0.95-1.05)
Age Groups: Infants
Summer: 39.11 ± 8.31 //g/m3
Month 3: 0.99 (0.95-1.05)
Fall: 47.76 ± 11.77 //g/m3
Two Pollutant Model (O3 + PM10)
Winter: 68.00 ± 21.88//g/m3
Month 1:0.99 (0.94-1.04)
Range (Min, Max):
Month 2: 0.99 (0.94-1.04)
Average: 20.75-78.05 //g/m3
Month 3: 0.98 (0.93-1.04)
Spring: 23.33-94.33//g/m3
Two Pollutant Model (CO + PM10)
Summer: 17.33-60.00 //g/m3
Month 1: 1.01 (0.96-1.06)
Fall: 21.00-72.00 //g/m3
Month 2: 1.00 (0.95-1.05)
Winter: 21.33-116.00 //g/m3
Month 3: 0.99 (0.95-1.05)
Copollutant (correlation):
Two Pollutant Model (NOx + PM10)
CO:-0.19
Month 1:1.02 (0.97-1.08)
NO,: 0.56
Month 2: 1.01 (0.95-1.07)
0s: 0.39
Month 3: 1.01 (0.95-1.07)
SO2: 0.50
Three Pollutant Model (O3 + CO + PM10)
Month 1:0.99 (0.94-1.04)
Month 2: 0.99 (0.94-1.04)
Month 3: 0.99 (0.93-1.04)
Three Pollutant Model (O3 + NOx + PM10)
Month 1:1.00 (0.94-1.06)
Month 2: 0.98 (0.92-1.05)
Month 3: 1.00 (0.93-1.06)
July 2009
E-499
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ingle et al. (2005, 089014)
Period of Study: May 2003-April 2004
Location: Jalgaon City, India
Outcome: Peak expiratory flow rate
(PEFR), Forced Expiratory Volume in 1
second (FEVi), Forced Vital Capacity
(FVC), Self reported "frequent coughing,"
Self reported "shortness of breath," Self
reported " irritation of respiratory tract"
Age Groups: 24-55 years (mean - 40)
Study Design: Cohort
N: 120 men (60 traffic policemen and 60
controls)
Statistical Analyses: AN0VA, odds
ratios calculated from 2X2 table
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: PMio
Mean (SD): Location-specific means:
Prabhat: 224 (27)
Ajanta: 269 (41)
Icchdevi: 229 (24)
Monitoring Stations: 3
OR Estimate [p-value]
Self reported frequent coughing
2.96 [p< 0.05]
Self reported shortness of breath
1.22 [p< 0.05]
Self reported irritation in respiratory tract
7.5 [p < 0.05]
Observed/expected lung function
p-value for difference between groups:
FVC (L)
Traffic policemen: 0.82
Controls: 0.99
Traffic policemen:
Obs - 3.03 ± 1.7 Exp - 3.70 ± 2.8
Controls:
Obs - 3.18 ± 0.91 Exp - 3.19 ± 1.71
FEV, (L)
Traffic policemen: 0.73
Controls: 1.18
Traffic policemen:
Obs - 2.27 ± 1.05 Exp - 3.08 ± 2.7
Controls:
Obs - 3.61 ± 0.90 Exp - 3.06 ± 0.91
PEFR (Us)
Traffic policemen: 0.66
Controls: 0.92
Traffic policemen:
Obs - 6.05 ± 2.15 Exp - 9.21 ± 0.47
Controls:
Obs - 5.54 ± 1.85 Exp - 6.11 ± 2.31
Reference: Islam et al. (2007, 090697)
Outcome: Respiratory symptoms,
Pollutants: PMio
The study doesn't present quantitative
Asthma
results on PMio.
Period of Study: 2006
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Study Design: Longitudinal study cohort
Location: 12 California communities
Copollutants (correlation): O3
Statistical Analyses: Cox proportional
NO?
hazards regression
Age Groups: 7-9
EC
10-11
OC
>11
July 2009
E-500
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Janssen et al. (2003,
133555)
Period of Study: 4/1997-7/1998
Location: Netherlands-24 schools
Outcome: Symptoms of asthma and
allergic disease (asthma, conjunctivitis,
hay fever, itchy rash, eczema, phlegm,
bronchitis), skin prick test (SPT) reaction
to allergens, lung function (forced vital
capacity [FVC], forced expiratory volume
in one second [FEVi], and positive test for
fall in FEVi a 15% after inhalation of
maximal 23 mL hypertonic saline [BHR -
bronchial hyper-responsiveness])
Age Groups: 7-12 years old
Study Design: Cohort
N: 24 schools (see notes)
Statistical Analyses: Multilevel model
Covariates: Age, sex, non-Dutch
nationality, cooking on gas, current
parental smoking, current pet possession,
parental education level, number of
persons in the household, presence of an
unvented water heater in kitchen,
questionnaire not filled out by the mother,
presence of mold stains in kitchen or
living room or bedroom, parental
respiratory symptoms, distance of home
to motorway, cough or cold at time of
lung function measurement, bronchitis or
severe cold or flu in 3 weeks preceding
measurement, season
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: MLwiN
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: Annual
Mean (SD): 20.5//gfm3 (2.2)
Percentiles:
25th: 18.6
50th (Median): 20.4
75th: 22.1
Range (Min, Max):
17.3, 24.4
PM Increment: 'Difference between the
maximum and the minimum of the
exposure indicator' (3.5/yg/m3)
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Current wheeze 1.51 (0.90, 2.53)
Asthma ever 1.03 (0.59,1.82)
Current conjunctivitis 2.08 (1.17, 3.71)
Hay fever ever 2.28 (1.13, 4.57)
Current itchy rash 1.63 (0.91, 2.89)
Eczema ever 1.31 (0.94,1.83)
Current phlegm 1.53 (0.74, 3.19)
Current bronchitis 1.71 (0.84, 3.50)
Elevated total IgE 1.45 (0.74, 2.84)
Any allergen (spt reactivity) 1.33 (0.83,
2.11)
Indoor allergens (spt reactivity) 1.17
(0.70,1.94)
Outdoor allergens (spt reactivity) 1.90
(1.06, 3.40)
FVC < 85% predicted 0.54 (0.29,1.00)
FEVi < 85% predicted 0.88 (0.37, 2.09)
BHR 0.93 (0.51,1.68)
Notes:
Figure 1 of the article illustrates the
association between exposures, including
PM2.6, and various respiratory symptoms
among children with and without a
positive SPT and positive BHR. In
general, the association between PM2.6
and respiratory symptoms were higher for
children with a positive SPT or BHR,
except for the outcome of current
phlegm. This effect appeared to be the
strongest for children with a positive
BHR, particularly for current wheeze and
current bronchitis.
The authors also reported separate
analyses for children with SPT reactivity
for indoor and outdoor allergens, but did
not report any clear differences between
the two groups. The authors did report, in
the text, that the OR of PM2.6 exposure
for children sensitized for outdoor
allergens was 7.64 for current itchy rash
(p < 0.05).
July 2009
E-501
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Kan, et al. (2007, 091383)
Period of Study: 1987-1992
Location: Four Communities in the U.S.:
Forsyth County, North Carolina
Jackson, Mississippi
northwest suburbs of Minneapolis,
Minnesota
and Washington County, Maryland.
Outcome: FEVi and FVC
Age Groups: Middle-:
54.2 years)
Pollutant: PMio
i (mean age was Averaging Time: 24-h PMio averag
over study period
Study Design: Hierarchical regression
N: 15,792
Statistical Analyses: SAS PROC MIXED Copollutant:
NO?
PM Component: Vehicle emissions
Monitoring Stations: 0
Covariates: Distance to major roads,
traffic exposure, age, ethnicity, sex,
smoking, environmental tobacco smoke
exposure, occupation, education, medical
history, BMI.
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package:
SPSS Version 11 for traffic density,
SAS Version 9.1.2 for statistical analysis
0s
RR Estimate (Lower CI, Upper CI):
(Note: for ARIC participants living < 150
meters from major roads)
Women
FEVi(mL)
Age-adjusted model
-29.5 (-52.2 to -6.9)
Multivariate model
¦15.7 (-34.4 to-2.9)
FVC (mL)
Age-adjusted model
-33.2 (-60.4 to -5.9)
Multivariate model
¦24.2 (-46.2,-2.3)
FEVi/FVC (%)
Age-adjusted model
-0.1 (-0.5,0.2)
Multivariate model
0.1 (-0.3,0.4)
Men
FEVi(mL)
Age-adjusted model
-38.4 (-76.7,0.6)
Multivariate model
¦6.4 (-38.1,25.3)
FVC (mL)
Age-adjusted model
¦17.01-62.0,28.0)
Multivariate model
10.9(-24.7,46.5)
FEVi/FVC (%)
Age-adjusted model
¦0.05 (-0.9,0.0)
Multivariate model
¦0.3 (-0.7,0.2)
Reference: Kimet al. (2005, 087418)
Period of Study: Mar and Dec 2000
Location: Incheon & Ganghwa, Korea
Outcome: lung function (FEVi, FVC)
Age Groups: middle school students
Study Design: Panel
N: 368 children
Statistical Analyses: Generalized liner
model
Covariates: c
Season: Spring and fall
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: monthly
Mean (SD):
Incheon
March 64
December 54
Ganghwa
March 64
December 53
Range (Min, Max): NR
PM Increment: NR
OR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI):
"The present study showed that the
values of FEVi and FVC were greater in
December than in March for both male
and female students at all academic
years...Because only the level of PMio
was significantly higher for March than
for December in both areas, the authors
suggest that decrements of pulmonary
function in March for both areas are
associated with the increased level of
PMio"
July 2009
E-502
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Kim et al. (2004, 087383)
Period of Study: Mar-June (spring) 2001
Sep-Nov (fall) 2001
Location: Alameda County, CA
Outcome: Asthma, bronchitis
Age Groups: Children (in grades 3-5)
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 1109 children, 871 (long term resident
children), 462 (long term related females),
403 (long term related males)
Statistical Analyses: 2-stage multiple
logistic regression model
Covariates: respiratory illness before
age of 2, household mold/moisture, pests,
maternal history of asthma (for asthma)
Season: Spring and fall
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: SAS 8.2
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 9 weeks
Mean (SD): Study Avg 30
Monitoring Stations: 10
Copollutant (correlation): r2 is
approximately 0.9 for all copollutants-
Black Carbon (BC), PM2.6, NOx, NO2, NO
(NOx-NO?)
PM Increment: 1.4 (IQR)
OR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Bronchitis
All subjects: 1.03 [0.99,1.07]
LTR subjects: 1.02(0.98,1.07]
LTR females: 1.04 [1.01,1.09]
LTR males: 1.01 [0.95,1.06]
Asthma
All subjects: 1.02 [0.96,1.09]
LTR subjects: 1.04(0.97,1.12]
LTR females: 1.09 [0.92,1.29]
LTR males: 1.02(0.94,1.10]
Asthma excluding outlier school having ;
larger proportion of Hispanics
All subjects: 1.06[0.97,1.16]
LTR subjects: 1.08 [0.98,1.19]
LTR females: 1.09 [0.96,1.24]
LTR males: 1.08[0.97,1.19]
Reference: Kumar et al. (2004, 089873) Outcome: Chronic respiratory symptoms Pollutant: PM10
81 Spirometric ventilatory defect
Period of Study: 1999-2001
Location: Mandi Gobindgarh and
Morinda, Punjab State, northern India
Age Groups: > 15 yrs
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 3603 individuals
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression
Covariates: Age, gender, migration, SES,
smoking, type of cooking fuel use
Dose-response Investigated? No
Mean (SD): Study town 112.8 (17.9)
Reference town 75.8 (2.9)
PM10 Increment:
Low vs. High
OR (Lower CI, Upper CI)
p-value
Chronic respiratory symptoms
Low 1.00 (ref)
High 1.5(1.2,1.8)
<0.001
Spirometric ventilatory defect
Low 1.00 (ref)
High 2.4 (2.0-2.9)
<0.001
July 2009
E-503
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Leonardi et al. (2000,
010272)
Period of Study: 1996
Location: 17 cities of Central Europe
(Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary ,
Poland, Romania, Slovakia)
Outcome: Immune biomarkers
Age Groups: 9-11
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 366 school children
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression
Covariates: Age, gender, parental
smoking, laboratory of analysis, recent
respiratory illness
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: STATA
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: annual PMio
Mean (SD): PMio: 65 (14)
Range (Min, Max):
PMio: (41, 96)
5th, median, & 95th percentile
PMio: 41,63, 90
% Change (Lower CI, Upper CI)
p-value
PMio
Neutrophils -5 (-33, 36)
>.20
Total lymphocytes 20 (-6, 54); .150
B lymphocytes 42 (-3,107); .067
Total T lymphocytes 30 (-2, 73); .072
CD4+ 28 (-10, 82);.177
CD8+ 29 (-5, 75); .097
CD4/CD8 7 (-20,43)
>.20
NK 33 (-10, 97);. 157
Total IgG 11 (-10, 38)
>.20
Total IgM 5 (-21, 39)
>.20
Total IgA 11 (-16,46)
>.20
Total IgE-8 (-62,123)
>.20
Reference: Lichtenfels et al, (2007,
097041)
Period of Study: 2001-2003
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Outcome: Secondary sex ratio
Study Design: Retrospective Cohort
Covariates: NR
Statistical Analysis: Correlation
Coefficient
Age Groups: Infants
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: Annual
Mean (SD) Unit:
2001: 49.8(10.5)/yglm3
2002: 48.5 (11.4) //g/m3
2003: 49.4 (14.4) //g/m3
Range (Min, Max): 31.71 -60.96 /yglm3
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Increment: NR
Correlation Coefficient:
R2 - 0.7642, P - 0.13
July 2009
E-504
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Lubinski, et al. (2005,
087563)
Period of Study: 1993-1997
Location: Poland
Outcome: Pulmonary function
TLC: total lung capacity
ITGV: interthoracic gas volume
ITGV%TLC: ITGV percent total lung
capacity
Raw: airway resistance
FVC: forced vital capacity
FEVi: forced expiratory volume, 1 second
FEVi%FVC: FEVi percent forced vital
capacity
PEF: peak expiratory flow
FEFbo: forced expiratory flow
Age Groups: 18-23 males, healthy
Study Design: ecological cross-sectional
study
N: 1278 subjects
Statistical Analyses: Multiple linear
regression, ANOVA
Covariates: report unclear on whether or
not there was covariate control, but may
include NO2 and SO2
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 12 mo
Mean (SD):
A: Highest Pollution Region
Katowice 67-125
Krakow 41-49
B: Moderate Pollution Region
Bielsko-Biala 29-48
Opole 18-45
Lodz 23-38
Warsaw 35-45
Wroclaw 28-76
Zagan 5-35
C: Lowest Pollution Region
Gizycko 5-18
Hel 12-18
Ostroda 23-33
Swinoujscie 7-16
Ustka 12-26
Copollutant: NO2, SO2
PM Increment: 1 //gfm3
Slope, multiple regression
TLC
FEVi
PM10: -0.05
PM10: 0.031
+SO2: 0.03
+SO2: -0.08
+NO2: -0.06
+NO2: -0.12
ITGV
FEVi%FVC
PM10: 0.01
PM10: 0.00
+SO2: -0.07
+SO2: -0.14
+NO2: -0.07
+NO2:-0.048
ITGV%TLC
PEF
PM10: -0.06
PM10: -0.18
+SO2: 0.08
+SO2: 0.056
+NO2: 0.00
+NO2: -0.09
Raw
FEF50
PM10: 0.075
PM10: 0.031
+SO2: -0.08
+SO2: -0.11
+NO2: 0.127
+NO2: -0.04
FVC
PM10: 0.045
+SO2: 0.045
+NO2: -0.14
Reference: McConnell et al. (1999,
007028)
Period of Study: 1993
Location: Southern California
Outcome: Bronchitis, chronic cough,
phlegm
Age Groups: Children: 4th, 7th, 8110th
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 3676 people
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression
Covariates: Age, sex, race, grade, health
insurance
Dose-response Investigated?
Yes
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: yearly avg 24 h PM10
Mean (SD): 34.8
Range (Min, Max): 13.0, 70.7
Copollutant (correlation): NO2
r - 0.74
0s
r - 0.32
Acid
r - 0.54
PM2.6
r - 0.90
NO2
r - 0.83
0s
r - 0.50
Acid
r - 0.71
PM10 Increment: 19/yg/m3
Children wf asthma
Bronchitis: 1.4 (1.1,1.8)
Phlegm: 2.1 (1.4,3.3)
Cough: 1.1 (0.8,1.7)
Children wf wheeze, no asthma
Bronchitis: 0.9 (0.7,1.3)
Phlegm: 0.9 (0.6,1.4)
Cough: 1.2 (0.9,1.8)
Children wf no wheeze, no asthma
Bronchitis: 0.7 (0.4,1.0)
Phlegm: 0.8 (0.6,1.3)
Cough: 0.9 (0.7,1.2)
July 2009
E-505
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: McConnell et al. (2003,
049490)
Period of Study: 1993-99
Location: 12 Southern CA communities
Outcome: bronchitis symptoms
Age Groups: 9-19
Study Design: communities selected on
basis of historic levels of criteria
pollutants and low residential mobility.
N: 475 children
Statistical Analyses: 3 stage regression
combined to give a logistic mixed effects
model
Covariates: sex, ethnicity, allergies
history, asthma history, SES, insurance
status, current wheeze, current exposure
to ETS, personal smoking status,
participation in team sports, in utero
tobacco exposure through maternal
smoking, family history of asthma,
amount of time routinely spent outside by
child during 2-6 pm.
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS Glimmix
macro
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 4 year averages
Mean (SD): .30.8(13.4)//g/m3
Range (Min, Max): 15.7-63.5
PM Component: particulate organic
carbon and elemental carbon
Copollutant (correlation): PM2 e: r -
0.79
PM 10-2.5: r - 0.79
Inorganic acid: r - 0.72
Organic Acid: r - 0.59
Elemental carbon: r - 0.71
Organic Carbon: r - 0.70
NO?: r - 0.20
O3: r - 0.64
PM Increment:
Between community range 47.8 /yglm3
Between community unit 1 /yglm3
Within community 1 /yglm3
OR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
Between community per range 1.72(0.93-
3.20) |
Between Community per unit 1.01 (1.00-
1.02)|
Within community per unit 1.04(0.99-
1.10)
Reference: McConnell et al. (2002,
023150)
Period of Study: 1993-1998
Location: 12 communities in Southern
California (grouped into either high and
low pollution communities)
Outcome: Asthma (new diagnosis)
Age Groups: 9-12 yrs, 12-13 yrs, 15-16
yrs
Study Design: Cohort
N:3535
Statistical Analyses: Multivariate
proportion hazard model
Covariates: Sex, age, ethnic origin, BMI,
child history of allergies and asthma
history, SES, maternal smoking, time
spent outside, history of wheezing,
ownership of insurance (yes/no), number
and type of sports played
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: SAS 8.1
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 4 yrs
Mean (SD): Low pollution communities:
21.6(3.8)
High pollution communities: 43.3
(12.0)
Percentiles: Low pollution communities:
50th(Median): 20.8
High pollution communities:
50th(Median): 43.3
Range (Min, Max): Low pollution
communities: 16.62, 27.3
High pollution communities: 33.5, 66.9
Monitoring Stations: 12
Copollutant (correlation): PM2 e:
r - 0.96
NO?: r - 0.65
0s
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Low PM communities: 1.0 [ref] 0 sport
1.5 [1.0,2.211 sport
1.2 [0.7,1.9] 2 sports
1.7 [0.9, 3.2] a 3 sports
High PM communities: 1.0 [ref] 0 sport
1.1 [0.7, 1.7] 1 sport
0.9[0.5,1.7] 2 sports
2.0 [1.1, 3.6] £3 sports
High vs Low PM10 communities: 0.8
(0.6, 1.0)
lncidence-l\l (incidence) number of
sports: Low PM communities: 49 (0.023)
0
54 (0.032) 1
22 (0.024) 2
13 (0.033) >3
High PM communities: 55 (0.021) 0
36 (0.021)1
14(0.018)2
16 (0.033) >3
July 2009
E-506
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Reference: McConnell, et al. (2006,
180226)
Period of Study: 1996-1999
Location: 12 Southern California
communities
Design & Methods
Outcome: Prevalence of bronchitic
symptoms (yearly).
Age Groups: 10-15-years-old
Study Design: longitudinal cohort
N: 475 asthmatic children
Statistical Analyses: Multilevel logistic
mixed effects models.
Covariates: age, second hand smoke
personal smoking history
sex, race.
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS with
GLIMMIX macro
Concentrations'
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 365 days
Percentiles: Community by year
(n - 48 - 12 communities ~ 4 years)
25th: NR
50th(Median): 3.4
75th: NR
Range (Min, Max):
Community by year (n - 48 - 12
communities ~ 4 years):
(0.89,8.7)
Monitoring Stations: 12
Copollutant: 0:i, NO2, EC, 0C
Acid vapor (acetic and formic acid)
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
PM Increment: 6.1 |Jg|m3
OR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
PM10
Dog (n - 292): 1.60 [1.12: 2.30]
No dog (n - 183): 0.89(0.57: 1.39]
PMio*Dog interaction p-value: 0.02
Cat (n - 202): 1.47 [0.96: 2.24]
No Cat (n - 273): 1.20(0.83: 1.73]
PMio*Cat interaction p-value: 0.41
Neither pet (n - 112): 0.91 (0.53: 1.56]
Cat only (n - 71): 0.84(0.42: 1.66]
Dog only (n - 161): 1.41 (0.91: 2.19]
Both pets (n - 131): 1.89(1.15:3.10]
Results suggest that dog ownership, a
source of residential exposure to
endotoxin, may worsen the severity of
respiratory symptoms from exposure to
air pollutants in asthmatic children.
Reference: Meng et al. (2007, 093275)
Period of Study: November 2000 and
September 2001 (collection of health
data)
Location: Los Angeles and San
counties
Outcome: Poorly controlled asthma vs.
controlled asthma
Age Groups: 18-64, 65 +
Study Design: Long-term exposure study
comparison of cases and controls
N: 1,609 adults (represented individuals
age 18 + who reported ever having been
diagnosed as having asthma by a
physician and had their address
successfully geocoded)
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression to evaluate associations
between TD (traffic density) and annual
avg air pollution concentrations and
poorly controlled asthma. Used sample
weights that adjusted for unequal
probabilities of selection into the CHIS
sample.
Covariates: Age, sex, race/ethnicity,
family federal poverty level, county,
insurance status, delay in care for
asthma, taking medications, smoking
behavior, self-reported health status,
employment, physical activity
Dose-response Investigated? yes
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24 over 1 year
Copollutant (correlation):
Oa: r - -0.72
NO?: r - 0.83
PM2.6: r - 0.84
CO: r - 0.42
TD: r - 0.14
PM Increment: Continuous data: per
10/yg/m3
OR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
All Adults: 1.08[0.82,1.43]
Non-Elederly Adults: 1.14(0.84,1.55]
Elderly: 0.84 [0.41,1.73]
Women: 1.38 [0.99,1.94]
July 2009
E-507
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Millstein et al. (2004,
088629)
Period of Study: Mar-Aug, 1995, and
Sep, 1995 to Feb, 1996
Data were taken from the Children's
Health Study
Location: Alpine, Atascadero, Lake
Arrowhead, Lake Elsinore, Lancaster,
Lompoc, Long Beach, Mira Loma,
Riverside, San Dimas, Santa Maria, and
Upland, CA
Outcome: Wheezing & asthma
medication use (ICD9 NR)
Age Groups: 4th grade students, mostly
9 yrs at the time of the study
Study Design: Cohort Study, stratified
into 2 seasonal groups/
N: 2081 enrolled, 2034 provided parent-
completed questionnaire.
Statistical Analyses: Multilevel, mixed-
effects logistic model.
Covariates: Contagious respiratory
disease, ambient airborne pollen and
other allergens, temperature, sex, age
race, allergies, pet cats, carpet in home,
environmental tobacco smoke, heating
fuel, heating system, water damage in
home, education level of questionnaire
signer, physician diagnosed asthma.
Season: Mar-Aug, 1995, and Sep, 1995
to Feb, 1996
Statistical Package: GLIMMIX SAS
8.00 macro for generalized linear mixed
models.
Lags Considered: 14
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: Monthly means for
PMio.
PM Component: Nitric acid, formic acid,
acetic acid
Monitoring Stations:
1 central location in each community
Copollutant (correlation):
Os:r - 0.76
NO?: r - 0.39
PM2.6: r - 0.91
PM Increment: IQR 13.39 //g/m3
Odds Ratio [lower CI, Upper CI]
Annual
PMio: 0.93(0.67,1.27]
March-August
PMio: 0.91 (0.46,1.80]
Sep-Feb
PMio: 0.65(0.40,1.06]
Reference: Neuberger et al. (2004,
093249)
Period of Study: 6/1999-6/2000
Location: Austria (Vienna and a rural
area near Linz)
Outcome: Questionnaire derived asthma
score, and a 1-5 point respiratory health
rating by parent
Age Groups: 7-10 years
Study Design: Cross-sectional survey
N: about 2000 children
Statistical Analyses: mixed models
linear regression-used factor analysis to
develop the "asthma score"
Covariates: Pre-existing respiratory
conditions, temperature, rainy days, #
smokers in household, heavy traffic on
residential street, gas stove or heating,
molds, sex, age of child, allergies of child,
asthma in other family members
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 4 week avg (preceding
interview)
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h
Copollutant (correlation): PM2.6
(r - 0.94) in Vienna
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3
Change in mean associated unit
increase in PM (p-value)
lag
Respiratory Health score
Vienna: 0.005 (p > 0.05)
lag 4 week avg
Rural area: 0.008 (p > 0.05)
lag 4 week avg
Asthma score
Vienna: 0.006 (p > 0.05)
lag 4 week avg
Rural area: -0.001 (p > 0.05)
lag 4 week avg
July 2009
E-508
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Oftedal et al. (2008,
093202)
Period of Study: 2001-2002
Location: Oslo, Norway
Outcome: Lung function (PEF, FEF2b%,
FEFbo%, FEVi, FVC)
Age Groups: 9-10 yrs
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 1847 children
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression
Covariates: Height, age, BMI, birth
weight, temperature, maternal smoking,
sex
Dose-response Investigated?
Yes
Statistical Package: SPSS, STATA, S-
Plus
Lags Considered: 1-3
Pollutant: PMio
IQR:
PMio in 1st yr of life: 10.3
PMio lifetime: 5.8
PM Increment: Per IQR
fB (Lower CI, Upper CI)
PMio in 1st yr of life
PEF-72.5 (-122.3 to -22.7)
FEF2B* -77.4 (-133.4 to -21.4)
FEFbo*-53.9 (-102.6. to-5.2)
FEVi-6.7 (-24.1,10.7)
FVC 0.5(-18.5,19.6)
PMio lifetime exposure
PEF-66.4 (-109.5 to -23.3)
FEF2B* -61.5 (-110.0 to -13.1)
FEFbo*-45.6 (-87.7 to-3.5)
FEVi-7.3 (-22.4, 7.7)
FVC-2.1 (-18.6,14.4)
Reference: Parker et al. (2009,192359)
Outcome: Respiratory allergyfhayfever
Pollutant: PMio
Increment: 10//gfm3
Period of Study: 1999-2005
Study Design: Cohort
Averaging Time: NR
Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Location: US
Covariates: survey year, age, family
Median: 24.1 /yglm3
Single Pollutant Model, variable N
structure, usual source of care, health
insurance, family income relative to
IQR: 20.8-28.7
Adjusted: 1.04 (0.99-1.09)
federal poverty level, race/ethnicity
Copollutant (correlation):
Statistical Analysis: logistic regression
Summer O3: 0.26
Statistical Package: SUDAAN
SO2: -0.19
Age Groups: 73,198 children aged 3-17
NO?: 0.48
years
PM2.6: 0.51
PM 10-2.B: 0.86
July 2009
E-509
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Penard-Morand et al. (2005,
087951)
Period of Study: 03/1999 - 10/2000
Mean concentrations of NO2, SO2, PM10,
and O3 were taken from 01/01/1998 to
1213112000
Location: 6 French cities: Bordeaux,
Clermont-Ferrand, Creteil, Marseille,
Strasbourg, Reims.
Outcome:
Flexural dermatitis
Asthma (493)
Rhinoconjunctivitis
Atopic dermatitis
Wheeze
Allergic rhinitis
Atopy
EIB (exercise-induced bronchial reactivity)
Age Groups: 9-11 years
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 9615 Children (6672 complete
examination and questionnaire info)
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression
Marginal Model (GENM0D)
Covariates: Age, Sex, Family history of
allergy, Passive smoking
Parental education
Season: All
Excluding end of spring and during
summer for clinical examinations
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 3 years
Mean (SD): Low concentrations: 26.9
High Concentrations: 23.8
Range (Min, Max):
Low concentrations: 10-20
High concentrations: 21.5-29.5
Copollutant (correlation): NO2: r -.46
SO2: r -.76
O3: r - -.02
Monitoring Stations: 16
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3 (IQR)
OR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
EIB (during exam): 1.43 (1.02-2.01)
Flexural dermatitis (during exam): 0.79
(0.59-1.07)
Wheeze (past year): 1.05 (0.72-1.54)
Asthma (past year): 1.23 (0.77-1.95)
Rhinoconjunctivitis (past year): 1.17
(0.86-1.59)
Atopic dermatitis (past year): 1.28 (0.96-
1.71)
Asthma (lifetime): 1.32 (0.96-1.81)
Allergic rhinitis (lifetime): 1.32 (1.04-
1.68)
Atopic dermatitis (lifetime): 1.09 (0.88-
1.36)
Atopy (lifetime): 0.98(0.80-1.22)
Pollen: 1.14(0.85-1.53)
Indoor: 0.91 (0.72-1.15)
Moulds: 1.00(0.53-1.88)
Highest correlated pollutant adjustments:
EIB (during exam): 1.16 (0.72-1.85)
Flexural dermatitis (during exam): 0.93
0(60-1.43)
Wheeze (past year): 1.31 (0.71-2.36)
Asthma (past year): 1.25 (0.66-2.37)
Rhinoconjunctivitis (past year): 1.22
(0.98-1.68)
Atopic dermatitis (past year): 1.63 (1.07-
2.49)
Asthma (lifetime): 1.11 (0.70-1.74)
Allergic rhinitis (lifetime): 1.19 (0.94-
1.59)
Atopic dermatitis (lifetime): 1.47 (1.07-
2.00)
Atopy (lifetime): 0.93(0.69-1.26)
Pollen: 1.30 (0.98-1.57)
Indoor: .83 (0.63-1.12)
Moulds: 1.62(0.64-4.09)
July 2009
E-510
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Peters et al„ (1999, 087237)
Period of Study: 1986-1990,1994
Location: Southern California
Outcome: Asthma, cough, bronchitis,
wheeze
Age Groups: 4th, 7th, & 10th graders
Study Design: cohort
l\l: 3676 children
Statistical Analyses: Stepwise logistic
regression
Covariates: Community, grade, race,
sex, height, BMI, asthma in parents, hay
fever, health insurance, plants in home,
mildew in home, passive smoke exposure,
pest infestation, carpet, vitamin
supplements, active smoking, pets, gas
stove, air conditioner
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h PMio averaged
over 1994
Mean based on data collected during
1986-1990,1994:
Alpine 37.4,21.3
Atascadero 28.0, 20.7
Lake Elsinore 59.5, 34.7
Lake Gregory 38.3, 24.2
Lancaster 47.0, 33.6
Lompoc 30.0,13.0
Long Beach 49.5, 38.8
Mira Loma 84.9, 70.7
Riverside 84.9, 45.2
San Dimas 67.0, 36.7
Santa Maria 28.0, 29.2
Upland 75.6, 49.0
PM Increment: 25/yg/m3
OR (Lower CI, Upper CI) for respiratory
illness
Based on 1986-1990 pollutant levels
Ever asthma 0.93 (0.76,1.13)
Current asthma 1.09 (0.86,1.37)
Bronchitis 0.94 (0.74,1.19)
Cough 1.06(0.93,1.21)
Wheeze 1.05 (0.89,1.25)
Based on 1994 pollutant levels
Ever asthma 0.87 (0.67,1.14)
Current asthma 1.11 (0.81,1.54)
Bronchitis 0.90 (0.65,1.26)
Cough 1.14(0.96,1.35)
Wheeze 1.01 (0.79,1.29)
July 2009
E-511
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Pierse, et al. (2006, 088757) Outcome: Cough without a cold Pollutant: PMio
Period of Study: 2 years (once in 1998
and once in 2001-surveys)
Location: Leicestershire, UK
Night time cough
Current wheeze
Age Groups: 1-5 years
Study Design: Cross-sectional (cohorts)
N: 4400 children
Statistical Analyses: Binomial
generalized linear models (compared with
likelihood ratio tests)
Spatial variograms (due to the spatial
concerns)
Covariates: Age, Gender
Mother/father has asthma
Coal heating the home, Smoking by
household member in the home, Either
parent continued education past 16 years
of age, Pre term birth, Breast feeding,
Gas cooking, Presence of pets, Number of
cigarettes smoked by mother,
Overcrowding, Single parenthood, Diet
Dose-response Investigated? Yes (Fig.
2 shows evidence of dose-response
effect based on surveys, states in
discussion).
Statistical Package: SAS 8.2
S-Plus 6.1
Averaging Time: annual PMio
Mean (SD): 1998: 1.47
2001: 1.33
Percentiles: 25th: 1998 (.73) and 2001
(.8)
75th: 1998(1.93) and 2001 (1.84)
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3 (IQR)
Unadjusted OR estimates [Lower CI,
Upper CI]:
Cough without cold (1998): 1.22 (1.10 to
1.36)
Cough without cold (2001): 1.46 (1.27 to
1.68)
Night-time cough (1998): 1.11 (1.01 to
1.23)
Night-time cough (2001): 1.25 (1.09 to
1.43)
Current wheeze (1998): 0.99 (0.89 to
1.10)
Current wheeze (2001): 1.09 (0.93 to
1.30)
Adjusted OR Estimate [Lower CI,
Upper CI]:
Cough without cold (1998): 1.21 (1.07 to
1.38)
Cough without cold (2001): 1.56 (1.32 to
1.84)
Night-time cough (1998): 1.06 (0.94 to
1.19)
Night-time cough (2001): 1.25 (1.06 to
1.47)
Current wheeze (1998): 0.99 (0.88 to
1.12)
Current wheeze (2001): 1.28 (1.04 to
1.58)
When the child was originally
asymptomatic in 1998:
Unadjusted OR estimates [Lower CI,
Upper CI]:
Cough without cold (2001): 1.68 (1.39 to
2.03)
Night-time cough (2001): 1.21 (1.00 to
1.46)
Current wheeze (2001): 1.22 (0.92 to
1.62)
Adjusted OR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper
CI]:
Cough without cold (2001): 1.62 (1.31 to
2.00)
Night-time cough (2001): 1.19 (0.96 to
1.47)
Current wheeze (2001): 1.42 (1.02 to
1.97)
July 2009
E-512
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Qian et al. (2005, 093283)
Period of Study: 1990-1992
Location: Forsythe, NC
Minneapolis, MN
Jackson, MS.
Outcome: FVC, FEVi, FEVilFVC
Age Groups: middle aged (avg 56.8
years)
Study Design: cross-sectional
N: 10,240 people
Statistical Analyses: regression
equations, multiple linear regression
analyses
Covariates: Smoking status, recent use
of respiratory medication, current
respiratory symptoms, chronic lung
diseases, field center
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS software,
version 9.1
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: Annual
Mean (SD): 27.9 (2.8)
Percentiles: 25th: 25.8
50th(Median): 27.5
75th: 30.2
Range (Maximum-Minimum): 12.2
Monitoring Stations: 3 (Minneapolis,
MN)
5 (Jackson, MS)
and 9 (Forsythe, NC)
Copollutant: 0:i
PM Increment: 2.8 //g|m3 (1 SD)
Effect Estimate:
In Never Smokers
FVC B - -0.0108, SE - 0.0026,
p -.0001
FEVi B - -0.0082, SE - 0.0029,
p - .0047
FEVilFVC B - -0.0024, SE - 0.0023,
p -.2787
Smoking status
Current n - 2377, FVC - -1.96, FEVi - ¦
2.23, FEVilFVC - -0.94
Former n - 3858, FVC - -1.25, FEVi - ¦
1.10, FEVilFVC - -0.30
Never n - 4005, FVC - -1.12, FEVi - ¦
0.63, FEVilFVC - 0.06
Recent Use of Respiratory Medication
Yes n - 424, FVC - -2.65, FEVi - ¦
3.89, FEVilFVC - -3.00
Non - 9816, FVC --1.41, FEVi -¦
1.20, FEVilFVC - -0.24
Current Respiratory Symptoms
Yes n- 4340, FVC --1.68, FEVi -¦
1.70, FEVilFVC - -0.63
Non - 5900, FVC --1.05, FEVi -¦
0.63, FEVilFVC - 0.05
Chronic Lung Diseases
Yes n - 1374, FVC --1.95, FEVi -¦
2.31, FEVilFVC - -1.18
Non - 8866, FVC --1.35, FEVi -¦
1.10, FEVilFVC - -0.19
Field Center
Forsythe, NC n - 3504, FVC - -0.03,
FEVi - 0.05, FEVilFVC - -0.33
Minneapolis, MN n - 3793, FVC - 0.50,
FEVi - 0.54, FEVilFVC - -0.30
Jackson, MS n - 2943, FVC - -0.01,
FEVi - 0.17, FEVilFVC - -0.32
July 2009
E-513
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Rios et al. (2004, 087800)
Period of Study: 1998-2000
Location: the metropolitan area of Rio de
Janiero, Brazil, Duque de Caxias (DC) and
Seropedica (SR)
Outcome: wheezing, asthma, cough at
night
Age Groups: 13-14 yrs
Study Design: cohort
N: 4064 students
Statistical Analyses: chi-squared
Covariates: sex, type of school, time of
residence, domestic smoking, residents
per home
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: Epilnfo
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: weekly measurements
used to create annual PM estimate
Mean (SD): DC
1998: 147
1999: 115
2000: 110
Total: 124
SR
1998: 37
1999: 31
2000: 37
Total: 35
Monitoring Stations: NR
PM Increment: High vs. Low
Global Cut-Off Score %, p-val:
DC
Male: 15.0
Female: 22.3, p< ,05t
Private School: 16.6
Public School: 19.4, p < .05*
< 5yr residence: 20.9
>5yr residence: 16.8
No domestic smoking exposure: 17.6
Domestic smoking exposure: 20.4,
p< .051"
< 5 residents per home: 18.4
5+ residents per home: 19.5
SR
Male: 12.3
Female: 19.7, p< ,05t
Private School: 28.3, p < .05*1"
Public School: 14.7
< 5yr residence: 10.8
>5yr residence: 16.5
No domestic smoking exposure: 14.8
Domestic smoking exposure: 18.3
< 5 residents per home: 15.6
5+ residents per home: 17.4
Notes: The Global Cut-off Score
encompasses replies to the asthma
component of ISAAC'S written
questionnaire that establishes a cut-off
from which is defined the presence of
asthma for the Brazilian population.
"comparing the cities in the same
controlled variable
tcomparing the controlled variable in the
same city
Reference: Rojas-Martinez et al. (2007,
091064)
Period of Study: 1996-1999
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Outcome: Lung function: FEVi, FVC,
FEF25-75%
Age Groups: Children 8 years old at time
of cohort recruitment
Study Design: school-based "dynamic"
cohort study
N: 3170 children
14,545 observations
Statistical Analyses: Three-level
generalized linear mixed models with
unstructured variance-covariance matrix
Covariates: age, body mass index,
height, height by age, weekday spent
outdoors, environmental tobacco smoke,
previous-day mean air pollutant
concentration, time since first test
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 6-mo
Mean (SD): 6-mo averaging
SD: NR
Mean: 75.6
Percentiles: 6-mo averaging
25th: 55.8
50th(Median): 67.5
75th: 92.2
Monitoring Stations: 5 sites for PMio,
10 for other pollutants
Copollutant:
Os
NO?
PM Increment: IQR 6-LC: 36.4
Slope [Lower CI, Upper CI]
Girls
One-pollutant model
FVC: -39 [-47:-31]
FEV: -29 [-36: -21]
FEF2e-7e«:-17 [-36: 1]
FEVi/FVC: 0.12(0.07: 0.17]
Two-pollutant model: PMio, 6-LC & O3
FVC: -30 [-39:-22]
FEV:-24 [-31:-16]
FEF2b-7b%: -9 [-26: 9]
FEVi/FVC: 0.10(0.06: 0.15]
July 2009
E-514
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Statistical Package: SA
PMio, 6-LC & NO?
FVC: -21 [-30:-13]
FEV: -17 [-25: -8]
FEF2B-7B*: -23 [-43: -4]
FEVi/FVC: 0.07 [0.02: 0.13]
Multipollutant model: PMio, 6-LC, O3, &
NO?
FVC:-14[-23:-5]
FEV:-11 [-20: -3]
FEF2B.7B*: -7 [-27: 12]
FEVi/FVC: 0.08 [0.03: 0.13]
Boys
One-pollutant model
FVC:-33 [-41:-25]
FEV: -27 [-34: -19]
FEF2b-7b%:-18 [-34: -2]
FEVi/FVC: 0.04 [-0.01:0.09]
Two-pollutant model: PMio, 6-LC & O3
FVC: -28 [-36:-19]
FEV: -22 [-30:-15]
FEF2b-7b%:-10 [-27: 7]
FEVi/FVC: 0.04 [-0.01:0.09]
FEVi/FVC: 0.24 [0.13: 0.34]
PMio, 6-LC & NO?
FVC: -16 [-26:-7]
FEV: -19 [-27:-10]
FEF2b-7b%: -26 [-44: -9]
FEVi/FVC: 0.005 [-0.06: 0.05]
Multipollutant model PMio, 6-LC, O3, &
NO2
FVC: -12 [-22: -3]
FEV: -15 [-23: -6]
FEF2b-7b%:-12 [-30: 6]
FEVi/FVC:-0.002 [-0.06: 0.05]
July 2009
E-515
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Schikowski et al. (2005,
088637)
Period of Study: 1985-1994
Location: Rhine-Ruhr Basin of Germany
[Dortmund (1985,1990), Duisburg
(1990), Gelsenkirchen (1986,1990), and
Heme (1986)]
Outcome: Respiratory symptoms &
pulmonary function
Age Groups: age 54-55
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N:4757 women
Statistical Analyses: Linear & Logistic
regressions, including random effects
model
Covariates: age, smoking, SES,
occupational exposure, form of heating,
BMI, height
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: NR
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: NR
Min, P25, Median, Mean, P75, Max
Annual Mean
35,40, 43, 44, 47, 53
Five year Mean
39,43, 47, 48, 53, 56
Monitoring Stations: 7
Copollutant (correlation): NR
PM Increment: 7 /yglm3
OR (Lower CI, Upper CI) for asthma
symptoms
Annual means
Chronic bronchitis 1.00 (0.85,1.18)
Chronic cough 1.03 (0.87,1.23)
Frequent cough 1.01 (0.93,1.10)
C0PD 1.37 (0.98,1.92)
p< 0.1
FEVi 0.953 (0.916, 0.989)
p< 0.1
FVC 0.966 (0.940, 0.992)
p< 0.1
FEVi/FVC 0.989 (0.978,1.000)
p< 0.1
Five year means
Chronic bronchitis 1.13 (0.95,1.34)
Chronic cough 1.11 (0.93,1.31)
Frequent cough 1.05 (0.94,1.17)
C0PD 1.33(1.03,1.72)
p< 0.1
FEVi 0.949 (0.923, 0.975)
p < 0.05
FVC 0.963 (0.945, 0.982)
p < 0.05
FEVi/FVC 0.989 (0.980, 0.997)
p< 0.1
Reference: Schindler et al, (2009,
191950)
Period of Study: 1991-2002
Location: Switzerland
Outcome: Respiratory Symptoms
Study Design: Prospective Cohort
Statistical Analysis: Logistic
Regression Model
Age Groups: Adults, 18-60 years of age
at start of study
Covariates: sex, age, level of education,
Swiss citizenship, BMI, parental smoking,
parental history of asthmafatopy, early
respiratory infection, smoking status,
pack years, daily number of cigarettes,
years since smoking cessation, passive
smoking in general/at work, occupational
exposure to airbourne irritants
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: Annual
Mean (SD) Unit:
Range (Min, Max):
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Increment: 10//gfm3
Odds Ratio (95%CI) of reporting
symptoms at second interview
Entire Sample, New Reports
Regular Cough: 0.77 (0.62-0.97)
Regular Phlegm: 0.74 (0.56-0.99)
Chronic Cough or Phlegm: 0.78 (0.62-
0.98)
Wheezing: 1.01 (0.74-1.39)
Wheezing with Dyspnea: 0.70 (0.49-1.01)
Wheezing without Cold: 1.06 (0.76-1.50)
Entire Sample, Persistent Reports
Regular Cough: 0.55 (0.39-0.78)
Regular Phlegm: 0.82 (0.52-1.33)
Chronic Cough or Phlegm: 0.67 (0.40-
1.15)
Wheezing: 0.50 (0.32-0.80)
Wheezing with Dyspnea: 0.59 (0.30-1.23)
Wheezing without Cold: 0.61- (0.35-1.12)
Persistent Non-Smokers, New Reports
July 2009
E-516
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Regular Cough: 0.86 (0.63-1.19)
Regular Phlegm: 0.70 (0.49-0.99)
Chronic Cough or Phlegm: 0.71 (0.52-
0.99)
Wheezing: 0.93(0.60-1.46)
Wheezing with Dyspnea: 0.77 (0.50-1.20)
Wheezing without Cold: 1.11 (0.66-1.92)
Persistent Non-Smokers, Persistent
Reports
Regular Cough: 0.28 (0.14-0.60)
Regular Phlegm: 0.87 (0.43-1.84)
Chronic Cough or Phlegm: 0.35 (0.16-
0.81)
Wheezing: 0.53(0.28-1.08)
Wheezing with Dyspnea: 0.76 (0.30-
2012)
Wheezing without Cold: 0.61 (0.26-1.52)
Gender-specific odds ratio (95%CI) of
reporting symptoms at second
interview
New Reports
Regular Cough, p - 0.73
Men: 0.75(0.53-1.06)
Women: 0.81 (0.58-1.15)
Regular Phlegm, p - 0.41
Men: 0.85(0.60-1.20)
Women: 0.68 (0.46-1.00)
Chronic Cough or Phlegm: 0.36
Men: 0.87(0.63-1.21)
Women: 0.71 (0.51-0.97)
Wheezing, p - 0.20
Men: 0.83(0.57-1.20)
Women: 1.20 (0.78-1.87)
Wheezing with Dyspnea, p - 0.11
Men: 0.56(0.36-0.87)
Women: 1.00.57-1.842
Wheezing without Cold, p - 0.43
Men: 0.95(0.63-1.42)
Women: 1.25 (0.72-2.17)
Persistent Reports
Regular Cough, p - 0.02
Men: 0.75(0.48-1.18)
Women: 0.31 (0.17-0.56)
Regular Phlegm, p - 0.33
Men: 0.65(0.37-1.12)
Women: 1.04 (0.47-2.34)
Chronic Cough or Phlegm: 0.47
July 2009
E-517
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Men: 0.68(0.39-1.20)
Women: 0.47 (0.20-1.11)
Wheezing, p - 0.29
Men: 0.34 (0.17-0.72)
Women: 0.57 (0.32-1.01)
Wheezing with Dyspnea, p - 0.63
Men: 0.56(0.16-1.95)
Women: 0.37 (0.13-1.05)
Wheezing without Cold, p - 0.57
Men: 0.34 (0.12-0.91)
Women: 0.49 (0.21-1.15)
Odds Ratio (95%CI) of reporting
symptoms at second interview with
additional adjustment for annual
outdoor PM exposure at baseline
Entire Sample
Regular Cough, p - 0.0003
New Reports: 0.77 (0.61-0.97)
Persistent Reports: 0.55 (0.39-0.78)
Regular Phlegm, p - 0.13
New Reports: 0.77 (0.59-1.02)
Persistent Reports: 0.79 (0.46-1.33)
Chronic Cough or Phlegm, p - 0.02
New Reports: 0.78 (0.62-0.98)
Persistent Reports: 0.64 (0.40-1.02)
Wheezing, p - 0.002
New Reports: 0.91 (0.63-1.33)
Persistent Reports: 0.47 (0.31-0.72)
Wheezing with Dyspnea, p - 0.03
New Reports: 0.65 (0.43-0.98)
Persistent Reports: 0.55 (0.28-1.10)
Severe Wheezing, p - 0.28
New Reports: 0.96 (0.66-1.40)
Persistent Reports: 0.62 (0.34-1.12)
Non-Smokers
Regular Cough, p < 0.001
New Reports: 0.87 (0.63-1.19)
Persistent Reports: 0.29 (0.16-0.52)
Regular Phlegm, p - 0.07
New Reports: 0.70 (0.50-0.99)
Persistent Reports: 0.67 (0.34-1.33)
Chronic Cough or Phlegm, p - 0.008
New Reports: 0.72 (0.52-0.99)
Persistent Reports: 0.38 (0.17-0.84)
Wheezing, p - 0.07
New Reports: 0.87 (0.52-1.48)
July 2009
E-518
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Persistent Reports: 0.48 (0.25-0.91)
Wheezing with Dyspnea, p - 0.36
New Reports: 0.76 (0.48-1.19)
Persistent Reports: 0.70 (0.27-1.82)
Severe Wheezing, p - 0.57
New Reports: 1.11 (0.64-1.93)
Persistent Reports: 0.64 (0.26-1.54)
Reference: Sharma et al. (2004,
156974)
Period of Study: 1112002-412003
Location: 3 sections in Kanpur City,
India: 1) Indian Institute of Technology
Kanpur (IITK)
2) Vikas Nagar (VN)
3) Juhilal Colony (JC)
Outcome: Lung function
Age Groups: 20-55 years
Study Design: Cohort
N: 91 people
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression
Covariates: NR
Season: Fall, Winter, spring
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: Microsoft Excel
Lags Considered: 1 d lag & 5d mov avg
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h
Mean (SD): IITK 184 (40)
VN 295 (58)
JC 293 (90)
PM Component: Lead, Nickel, Cadmium,
Chromium, Iron, Zinc
Benzene soluble fraction (includes
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [PAHs])
Copollutant (correlation): nPEF - mean
daily deviations in PEF
PMio-nPEF: (-0.52)
PMio-PM2.b: (0.67)
PMio-PMio (1-day lag): (0.45)
PMio-PM2.b (1-day lag): (0.46)
PM Increment: 1 /yglm3
~PEF (difference or change in peak
expiratory flow)
¦0.0318 L/min
Reference: Tager et al. (2005, 087538)
Period of Study: 412000- 612000,
212001-612001,
212002-612002
Location:
Los Angeles, California
San Francisco, California
Outcome: Lung Function (FEVi, FVC,
PEFR, FEF75, FEF25-75, FEF2b jb/FVC ratio)
Age Groups: 16-21 + yfo
College Freshman
Study Design: Retrospective cohort
N: 255 students
108 Men (M)
147 Women (W)
Statistical Analyses: Multivariate
Linear Regression
Covariates: Sex, height, weight, area of
residence, age, race, ETS exposure,
respiratory disease history
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: Cumulative lifetime
exposure
Median: Prior to 1987: M: 73
W: 71
1987 and later: M: 36
W: 34
Lifetime: M: 48
W: 45
Range (Min, Max): Prior to 1987: M: 34,
117
W:31,124
1987 and later: M:18, 68
W: 20, 61
Lifetime: M: 21, 80
W: 18,71
Monitoring Stations: Between 1 and 3
Copollutant (correlation): O3 prior to
1987: r - 0.68
O3 1987 and later: r - 0.81
O3—Lifetime: r - 0.57
PM Increment: 1 /yglm3
Parameter Estimates (SD)
(Lifetime PM10, Interaction PM10
FEF2b-7b|FVC)
LnFEF75:
M:-0.009 (0.0009), 0.009(0.007)
W:-0.010(0.0007), 0.008(0.0005)
July 2009
E-519
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Tamura et a. (2003, 087445) Outcome: non specific respiratory
disease (Chronic bronchitis, acute
Period of Study: 1998-1999
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Pollutant: PMio
bronchitis, bronchial asthma, dyspnea and Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD):
wheezing)
Age Groups: adults
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 1603 policemen
Statistical Analyses: Multiple logistic
regression
Covariates: age, smoking status
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: SPSS
Heavily Polluted 80-190
Moderately Polluted 60-69
Control 59
Monitoring Stations: 13
PM Increment: Heavily Polluted vs.
Moderately Polluted vs. Control
Number and Prevalence (%) of respiratory
disease among heavily polluted,
moderately polluted, and control areas.
Heavily Polluted
Chronic bronchitis 16 (3.0)
Acute bronchitis 19 (3.5)
Bronchial asthma 5 (0.9)
Dyspnea & wheezing 49 (9.2)
Any 1 of above 69 (13.0)
Persistent cough 11 (2.1)
Persistent phlegm 27 (1.3)
Cough & phlegm 6 (1.1)
Moderately Polluted
Chronic bronchitis 8 (2.4)
Acute bronchitis 12 (9.0)
Bronchial asthma 2 (0.6)
Dyspnea & wheezing 23 (6.8)
Any 1 of above 37 (10.9)
Persistent cough 1 (0.3)
Persistent phlegm 11 (3.3) |
Cough & phlegm 1 (0.3)
Control
Chronic bronchitis 6 (1.9)
Acute bronchitis 11 (3.3)
Bronchial asthma 0 (0.0)
Dyspnea & wheezing 23 (7.2)
Any 1 of above 31 (9.4)
Persistent cough 1 (0.3)
Persistent phlegm 8 (2.4)
Cough & phlegm 1 (0.3)
Reference: Wheeler and Ben-Schlomo
(2005, 089860)
Period of Study: 1995-1997
Location: England
Outcome: FEVi
Age Groups: 16-79 yrs
Study Design: Data from Health Survey
for England were coupled geographically
with air pollution measurements on a 1
km grid.
N: 26,426 households with 39,251
adults
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression, least squares regression
Covariates: Age, sex, height, body mass
index, smoking status, household passive
smoke exposure, inhaler use in the
previous 24-hs, doctor diagnosis of
asthma.
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 1996 annual mean
Mean (SD): 23.95 (3.58)
Range (Min, Max): 17.87-43.37
fB (95%CI) for Height-age standardized
FEVi by ambient air quality index
p-value
Male
Good (ref)
Poor-0.023 (-0.030 to-0.016)
<0.001
Female
Good (ref)
Poor-0.019 (-0.026 to -0.013)
<0.001
Dose-response Investigated? No
July 2009
E-520
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Zhang et al„ (2002, 034814)
Period of Study: 1993-1996
Location: 4 Chinese cities (urban and
suburban location in each city):
Guangzhou, Wuhan, Lanzhou, Chongqing
Outcome: Interview-self reports of
symptoms: Wheeze (ever wheezy when
having a cold)
Asthma (diagnosis by doctor)
Bronchitis (diagnosis by doctor),
Hospitalization due to respiratory disease
(ever)
Persistent cough (coughed for at least 1
month per year with or apart from colds)
Persistent phlegm (brought up phlegm or
mucus from the chest for at least 1
month per year with or apart from colds)
Age Groups: Elementary school students
age range: 5.4-16.2
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 7,557 returned questionnaires
7,392 included in first stage of analysis
Statistical Analyses: 2-stage
regression approach: Calculated odds
ratios and 95% CIs of respiratory
outcomes and covariates Second stage
consisted of variance-weighted linear
regressions that examined associations
between district-specific adjusted
prevalence rates and district-specific
ambient levels of each pollutant.
Covariates: Age, gender, breast-fed,
house type, number of rooms, sleeping in
own or shared room, sleeping in own or
shared bed, home coal use, ventilation
device used, homes smokiness during
cooking, eye irritation during cooking,
parental smoking, mother's education
level, mother's occupation, father's
occupation, questionnaire respondent,
year of questionnaire administration,
season of questionnaire administration,
parental asthma prevalence
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 2 years
Mean (SD): 151 (56)
IQR: 87
Range (Min, Max):
Gives range (max.-min.):
80
Monitoring Stations:
2 types: municipal monitoring stations
over a period of 4 years (1993-1996)
schoolyards of participating children over
a period of 2 years (1995-1996)
PM Increment: Interquartile range
corresponded to 1 unit of change.
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Association between persistent phlegm
and PMio: 3.21 (1.55, 6.67)
p < 0.05
Between and within city modeled ORs,
scaled to interquartile range of
concentrations for each pollutant.
No associations between any type of
respiratory outcome and PMio
When scaled to an increment of 50 /yglm3
of PMio, ORs were:
Wheeze: 1.07
Asthma: 1.18
Bronchitis: 1.53
Hospitalization: 1.17
Persistent cough: 1.20
Persistent phlegm: 1.95
'All units expressed in/yglm3 unless otherwise specified.
Table E-23. Long-term exposure - respiratory morbidity outcomes - PM102.5.
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Chattopadhyay et al. (2007,
Outcome: pulmonary function tests
Pollutant: PM0304
PM Increment: NR
147471)
(respiratory impairments)
Averaging Time: 8 h
Respiratory impairments (SD):
Period of Study: NR
Age Groups: All ages
Mean (SD):
North Kolkata
Location: Three different points in
Study Design: Cross-sectional
North Kolkata: 266.1
Male (n — 137)
Kolkata, India: North, South, and Central
N: 505 people studied for PFT
Central Kolkata: 435.3
Restrictive: 4 (2.92)
total population of Kolkata not given
South Kolkata: 449.1
Obstructive: 5 (3.64)
Statistical Analyses:
Unit (i.e./yg/m3):/yg/m3
Combined Res. And Obs.: 6 (4.37)
Frequencies
Monitoring Stations: 1
Total: 15(10.95)
Covariates: Meteorologic data (i.e.
temperature, wind direction, wind speed
I Copollutant (correlation):
Female (n — 152)
and humidity)
PMio
Restrictive: 3 (1.97)
Dose-response Investigated? No
PM < 10-3.3
Obstructive: 5 (3.28)
Combined Res. And Obs.: 0
July 2009
E-521
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Total: 8 (5.26)
Total (n — 289)
Restrictive: 7 (2.42)
Obstructive: 10 (3.46)
Combined Res. And Obs.: 6 (2.07)
Total: 23 (7.96)
Central Kolkata
Male (n-44)
Restrictive: 6 (13.63)
Obstructive: 1 (2.27)
Combined Res. And Obs.: 1 (2.27)
Total: 8 (18.18)
Female (n — 50)
Restrictive: 3 (6.00)
Obstructive: 2 (4.00)
Combined Res. And Obs.: 0
Total: 5 (10.00)
Total (n — 94)
Restrictive: 9 (9.57)
Obstructive: 3 (3.19)
Combined Res. And Obs.: 1 (1.06)
Total: 13(13.82)
South Kolkata
Male (n — 52)
Restrictive: 1 (1.92)
Obstructive: 2 (3.84)
Combined Res. And Obs.: 3 (5.76)
Total: 6 (11.53)
Female (n — 70)
Restrictive: 2 (2.85)
Obstructive: 1 (1.42)
Combined Res. And Obs.: 0
Total: 3 (4.28)
Total (n — 122)
Restrictive: 3 (2.45)
Obstructive: 3 (2.45)
Combined Res. And Obs.: 3 (2.45)
Total: 9 (7.37)
Reference: Chattopadhyay et al. (2007,
Outcome: pulmonary function tests
Pollutant: PM< 10-3.3
PM Increment: NR
147471)
(respiratory impairments)
Averaging Time: 8 h
Respiratory impairments (SD):
Period of Study: NR
Age Groups: All ages
Mean (SD):
North Kolkata
Location: Three different points in
Study Design: Cross-sectional
North Kolkata: 269.8
Male (n — 137)
Kolkata, India: North, South, and Central
N: 505 people studied for PFT
Central Kolkata: 679.2
Restrictive: 4 (2.92)
total population of Kolkata not given
South Kolkata: 460.1
Obstructive: 5 (3.64)
July 2009
E-522
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Statistical Analyses: Frequencies
Covariates: Meteorologic data (i.e.
temperature, wind direction, wind speed,
and humidity)
Dose-response Investigated? No
Combined Res. And Obs.: 0
Total: 8 (5.26)
Total (n — 289)
Restrictive: 7 (2.42)
Obstructive: 10 (3.46)
Combined Res. And Obs.: 6 (2.07)
Total: 23 (7.96)
Central Kolkata
Male (n-44)
Restrictive: 6 (13.63)
Obstructive: 1 (2.27)
Combined Res. And Obs.: 1 (2.27)
Total: 8 (18.18)
Female (n — 50)
Restrictive: 3 (6.00)
Obstructive: 2 (4.00)
Combined Res. And Obs.: 0
Total: 5 (10.00)
Total (n — 94)
Restrictive: 9 (9.57)
Obstructive: 3 (3.19)
Combined Res. And Obs.: 1 (1.06)
Total: 13(13.82)
South Kolkata
Male (n — 52)
Restrictive: 1 (1.92)
Obstructive: 2 (3.84)
Combined Res. And Obs.: 3 (5.76)
Total: 6 (11.53)
Female (n — 70)
Restrictive: 2 (2.85)
Obstructive: 1 (1.42)
Combined Res. And Obs.: 0
Total: 3 (4.28)
Total (n — 122)
Restrictive: 3 (2.45)
Obstructive: 3 (2.45)
Combined Res. And Obs.: 3 (2.45)
Total: 9 (7.37)
Unit (i.e./yg/m ):/yg/m
Monitoring Stations: 1
Copollutant (correlation):
PMio
PM< 3.3-0.
Combined Res. And Obs.: 6 (4.37)
Total: 15(10.95)
Female (n — 152)
Restrictive: 3 (1.97)
Obstructive: 5 (3.28)
July 2009
E-523
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Dales et al., (2008,156378) Outcome: Pulmonary function and
inflammation
Period of Study: Location: Windsor, ON
Age Groups: grades 4-6
Study Design: cross-sectional
prevalence design
Statistical Analyses: multivariate linear 95th: 8.23
Pollutant: PMio-2.5
Averaging Time: Annual
Mean: 7.25
5th: 6.02
regression
Covariates: Ethnic background, smokers
at home, pets at home, acute respiratory
illness, medication use
Copollutant:
SO?
NO?
Increment: Tertiles of exposure
FEVi:
<7.04: 2.18 ± 0.01
7.04-7.53: 2.19 ± 0.02
>7.53: 2.14 ± 0.01
FVC:
<7.04: 2.52 ± 0.02
7.04-7.53: 2.53 ± 0.02
>7.53: 2.48 ± 0.02
eNO:
<7.04: 15.48 ± 0.63
7.04-7.53: 16.73 ± 0.76
>7.53: 16.59 ± 0.79
Reference: Gauderman et al. (2000,
012531)
Period of Study: 1993-1997
Location: Southern California
Outcome: FVC, FEVi, MMEF, FEFjb
Age Groups: fourth, seventh, or tenth
Study Design: cohort
N: 3035 subjects
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression
Covariates: Height, weight, BMI,
asthma, smoking, exercise, room
temperature, barometric pressure
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: SAS
Pollutant: PMio-2.5
Averaging Time: 24 h avg PMio &
annual avg of 2-week avg PM2.6
Mean (SD): PMio-2.5 25.6
Copollutant (correlation):
0s
r - -0.29
NO? r - 0.44
Inorg. Acid r - 0.43
Increment: 25.6 /yglm3
% Change (Lower CI, Upper CI)
PMio-2.5-4th grade
FVC-0.57 (-1.20 to-0.06)
FEVi-0.90 (-1.71 to-0.09)
MMEF-1.37 (-2.57 to-0.15)
FEFjb -1.62 (-3.24, 0.04)
PMio-2.5-7th grade
FVC-0.35 (-1.02, 0.31)
FEVi-0.49 (-1.21,0.24)
MMEF-0.64 (-2.83,1.60)
FEFjb-0.74 (-2.65,1.20)
PMio-2.5-10th grade
FVC-0.17 (-1.32, 0.99)
FEVi-0.68 (-2.15, 0.81)
MMEF-1.41 (-5.85, 3.25)
FEFjb-2.32 (-6.60, 2.17)
Reference: Gauderman et al. (2002,
026013)
Period of Study: 1996-2000
Location: Southern California
Outcome: Lung function development:
FEVi, maximal mid-expiratory flow
(MMEF)
Age Groups: Fourth grade children (avg
age - 9.9 yrs)
Study Design: Cohort study
N: 1678 children, 12 communities
Statistical Analyses: Mixed model
linear regression
Covariates: Height, BMI, doctor-
diagnosed asthma and cigarette smoking
in previous year, respiratory illness and
exercise on day of test, interaction of
each of these variables with sex,
barometric pressure, temperature at test
time, indicator variables for field
technician and spirometer
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: SAS (10)
Pollutant: PMio-2.5
Averaging Time: Annual 24 h averages
Mean (SD): The avg levels were
presented in an online data supplement
(Figure E1)
Monitoring Stations: 12
Copollutant (correlation):
0s (10 AM to 6 PM) r - 0.10
O3 r - -0.31
NO? r - 0.46
Acid vapor r - 0.63
PM10 r - 0.95
PMio-2.5 r - 0.81
EC r - 0.71
0C r - 0.96
PM Increment: 29.1 /yglm3
Association Estimate:
PMio-2.5 was not correlated with any of
the pulmonary function tests that were
analyzed
July 2009
E-524
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Leonardi et al. (2000,
010272)
Period of Study: 1996
Location: 17 cities of Central Europe
(Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary ,
Poland, Romania, Slovakia)
Outcome: Immune biomarkers
Age Groups: 9-11
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 366 school children
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression
Covariates: Age, gender, parental
smoking, laboratory of analysis, recent
respiratory illness
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: STATA
Pollutant: PMio-2.5
Averaging Time: subtracting PM2.6 from
PM10 provides avg PM10 2.5
Mean (SD): PMio-2.5: 20 (5)
Range (Min, Max):
PM 10-2.5: (12,38)
5th, median, 81 95th percentile
PMio-2.5:12,19, 29
% Change (Lower CI, Upper CI)
p-value
PMio-2.5
Neutrophils 1 (-27, 38)
>.20
Total lymphocytes 8 (-15, 38)
>.20
B lymphocytes 22 (-16, 76)
>.20
Total T lymphocytes 2 (-25, 37)
>.20
CD4+-1 (-30,41)
>.20
CD8+ 3 (-25, 41)
>.20
CD4/CD8 0 (-23, 30)
>.20
NK 1 (-33,51)
>.20
Total IgG-3 (-21,18)
>.20
Total IgM 19 (-9, 55)
>.20
Total IgA 16(-12, 52)
>.20
Total IgE-29 (-70, 70)
>.20
Reference: McConnell et al. (2003,
049490)
Period of Study: 1993-99
Location: 12 Southern CA communities
Outcome: bronchitic symptoms
Age Groups: 9-19
Study Design: communities selected on
basis of historic levels of criteria
pollutants and low residential mobility.
N: 475 children
Statistical Analyses: 3 stage regression
combined to give a logistic mixed effects
model
Covariates: sex, ethnicity,
history, asthma history, SES, insurance
status, current wheeze, current exposure
to ETS, personal smoking status,
participation in team sports, in utero
tobacco exposure through maternal
smoking, family history of asthma,
amount of time routinely spent outside by
child during 2-6 pm.
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS Glimmix
macro
Pollutant: PMio-2.5
Averaging Time: 4 year avg
Mean (SD): 17.0(6.4)
Range (Min, Max): 10.2-35.0
Copollutant (correlation):
PM2.6: r - 0.24
PM10: r - 0.79
Inorganic acid: r - 0.38
Organic Acid: r - 0.35
EC: r - 0.30
0C: r - 0.27
NO2: r - -0.22
O3: r - 0.29
PM Increment: Between community
range 24.8 /yglm3
Between community unit 1 /yglm3
Within community 1 /yglm3
OR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
Between community per range
1.38(0.65-2.92)
Between Community per unit
1.01(0.98-1.04)
Within community per unit
1.02(0.95-1.10)
July 2009
E-525
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Millstein et al. (2004,
088629)
Period of Study: Mar-Aug, 1995, and
Sep, 1995 to Feb, 1996
Data were taken from the Children's
Health Study
Location: Alpine, Atascadero, Lake
Arrowhead, Lake Elsinore, Lancaster,
Lompoc, Long Beach, Mira Loma,
Riverside, San Dimas, Santa Maria, and
Upland, CA
Outcome: Wheezing & asthma
medication use
Age Groups: 4th grade students, mostly
9 yrs at the time of the study
Study Design: Cohort Study, stratified
into 2 seasonal groups/
N: 2081 enrolled, 2034 provided parent-
completed questionnaire.
Statistical Analyses: Multilevel, mixed-
effects logistic model.
Covariates: Contagious respiratory
disease, ambient airborne pollen and
other allergens, temperature, sex, age
race, allergies, pet cats, carpet in home,
environmental tobacco smoke, heating
fuel, heating system, water damage in
home, education level of questionnaire
signer, physician diagnosed asthma.
Season: Mar-Aug, 1995, and Sep, 1995
to Feb, 1996
Statistical Package: SAS 8.00
Lags Considered: 14
Pollutant: PMio-2.5
Averaging Time: monthly
PM Component: Nitric acid, formic acid,
acetic acid
Monitoring Stations: 1 central location
in each community
Copollutant (correlation):
NO?: r - 0.29
Os:r - 0.77
PM2.6: r - -0.08
PM Increment: IQR 11.44/yg/m3
Odds Ratio [lower CI, Upper CI]
Annual
PMio-2.5: 0.96 [0.74,1.25]
March-August
PMio-2.5: 0.93 [0.54,1.59]
Sep-Feb
PMio-2.5: 0.68 [0.46,1.01]
Reference: (Parker et al., 2009,
192359)
Period of Study: 1999-2005
Location: US
Outcome: Respiratory allergyfhayfever
Study Design: Cohort
Covariates: survey year, age, family
structure, usual source of care, health
insurance, family income relative to
federal poverty level, race/ethnicity
Statistical Analysis: logistic regression
Statistical Package: SUDAAN
Age Groups: 73,198 children aged 3-17
years
Pollutant: PM10-2.E
Averaging Time: NR
Median: 11.2 /yglm3
IQR: 8.2-15.2
Copollutant (correlation):
Summer O3: 0.16
SO2: -0.33
NO?: 0.29
PM2.6: 0.02
PM10: 0.86
Increment: 10//gfm3
Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Single Pollutant Model, variable N
Adjusted: 1.01 (0.95-1.07)
Single Pollutant Model, constant N
Adjusted: 1.13(1.04-1.46)
Multi-pollutant Model: 1.16 (1.06-1.24)
July 2009
E-526
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Zhang et al. (2002, 034814)
Period of Study: 1993-1996
Location: 4 Chinese cities (urban and
suburban location in each city):
Guangzhou, Wuhan, Lanzhou, Chongqing
Outcome: Interview-self reports of
symptoms: Wheeze (ever wheezy when
having a cold)
Asthma (diagnosis by doctor)
Bronchitis (diagnosis by doctor),
Hospitalization due to respiratory disease
(ever)
Persistent cough (coughed for at least 1
month per year with or apart from colds)
Persistent phlegm (brought up phlegm or
mucus from the chest for at least 1
month per year with or apart from colds)
Age Groups: Elementary school students
age range: 5.4-16.2
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 7,557 returned questionnaires
7,392 included in first stage of analysis
Statistical Analyses: 2-stage
regression approach: Calculated odds
ratios and 95% CIs of respiratory
outcomes and covariates Second stage
consisted of variance-weighted linear
regressions that examined associations
between district-specific adjusted
prevalence rates and district-specific
ambient levels of each pollutant.
Covariates: Age, gender, breast-fed,
house type, number of rooms, sleeping in
own or shared room, sleeping in own or
shared bed, home coal use, ventilation
device used, homes smokiness during
cooking, eye irritation during cooking,
parental smoking, mother's education
level, mother's occupation, father's
occupation, questionnaire respondent,
year of questionnaire administration,
season of questionnaire administration,
parental asthma prevalence
Pollutant: PMio-2.5
Averaging Time: 2 years
Mean (SD): 59 (28)
Percentiles: 25th: NR
50th(Median): NR
75th: NR
IQR: 42
Range (Min, Max):
Gives range (max.-min.):
80
Monitoring Stations:
2 types: municipal monitoring stations
over a period of 4 years (1993-1996)
schoolyards of participating children over
a period of 2 years (1995-1996)
PM Increment: Interquartile range
corresponded to 1 unit of change.
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Association between bronchitis and PMio-
2.5:2.20(1.14,4.26)
p < 0.05
Association between persistent cough
and PMio-2.5:1.46 (1.12,1.90)
p < 0.05
Between and within city associations:
Bronchitis: 3.18 (between city)
Persistent phlegm (between city): 2.78
When scaled to an increment of 50 /yglm3
of PMio-2.5 associations (ORs) between
respiratory outcome and PMio-2.5 were:
Wheeze: 1.14
Asthma: 1.34
Bronchitis: 2.56
Hospitalization: 1.58
Persistent cough: 1.57
Persistent phlegm: 3.45
'All units expressed in //gfm3 unless otherwise specified.
July 2009
E-527
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table E-24. Long-term exposure - respiratory morbidity outcomes - PM2.5 (including PM
components/sources).
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Annesi-
Maesano et al.(2007,
091348)
Outcome: EIB, Flexural atopic
dermatitis, asthma, rhiniconjuctivitis,
allergic rhinitis
Averaging Time: 5-day mean (Mon.- Allergic and respiratory morbidity OR Estimate (Lower CI, Upper
Fri.) over a 13-week to 24-week span CI)
Residential Proximity Level Proximity Level
Pollutant: PM2.6
PM Increment: High vs. Low
Period of Study: Mar Age Groups: Children mean
1999-Oct 2000 10.4 ± 0.7 yrs
Location: France Study Design: Semi-individual design
(Bordeaux, Clermont-
Ferrand, Creteil, Marseille, N: 5338
Strasbourg,, & Reims) c. .. .. . . . . ...
0 Statietiral Analveec nnictir
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression
Covariates: Age, sex, family history
of allergy, passive smoking
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated?
No
Statistical Package: SAS
Mean (SD): Low cone: 8.7
High cone: 20.7
Range (Min, Max):
Low cone: (1.6,12.2)
High cone: (12.5, 54.0)
City Level
Mean (SD): Low cone: 9.6
High cone: 23.0
Range (Min, Max):
Low cone: (4.7,12.7)
High cone: (13.0, 54.5)
EIB (0 1.35 (1.10,1.67)
Fl. Atopic dermatitis (C) 2.51 (2.06, 3.06)
Asthma (P) 1.11 (0.88,1.39)
Atopic asthma (P) 1.43 (1.07,1.91)
Non-atopic asthma (P) 0.73 (0.49,1.07)
Rhiniconjunctivitis (P) 0.94 (0.77,1.15)
Atopic dermatitis (P) 1.05 (0.88,1.27)
Asthma (L) 1.00 (0.82,1.22)
Allergic Rhinitis (L) 1.09 (0.93,1.27)
Atopic dermatitis (L) 0.94 (0.82,1.09)
City Level
EIB (0 1.43 (1.15,1.78)
FL Atopic dermatitis (C) 2.06 (1.69, 2.51)
Asthma (P) 1.31 (1.04,1.66)
Atopic asthma (P) 1.58 (1.17, 2.14)
Non-atopic asthma (P) 1.00 (0.68,1.49)
Rhiniconjunctivitis (P) 0.98 (0.80,1.20)
Atopic dermatitis (P) 1.08 (0.90,1.30)
Asthma (L) 1.09 (0.89,1.33)
Allergic Rhinitis (L) 1.13 (0.97,1.33)
Atopic dermatitis (L) 0.95 (0.82,1.09)
Notes: C - Current
P - Past year
L - Lifetime
Allergic sensitization OR Estimate (Lower CI, Upper CI)
Proximity Level
All allergens 1.19(1.04,1.36)
Indoor allergens 1.29 (1.11,1.50)
Outdoor allergens 1.02 (0.85,1.23)
Moulds 1.13 (0.78,1.65)
City Level
All allergens 1.32(1.15,1.51)
Indoor allergens 1.51 (1.29,1.76)
Outdoor allergens 1.06 (0.88,1.28)
Moulds 1.00 (0.69,1.46)
July 2009
E-528
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Bakke et al.
(2004,156246)
Period of Study: January
1,1989-June 31, 2002
Location: One of
Norway's major
construction companies
Outcome: Spirometric measurements
Age Groups: All ages, mean - 39
yrs
Study Design: cohort
N: 651 male construction workers
Statistical Analyses: Multiple linear
regression models
Covariates: Age, years for non-
smokers and ever smokers
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SYSTAT 10.0
and SPSS 11.0
Pollutant: Respirable dust
Averaging Time: 5-8 h
Mean (SD): Drill and blast workers:
6.3(2.8)
Tunnel concrete workers: 6.1 (3.1)
Shotcreting operators: 19(11)
TBM workers: 16 (6.6)
Outdoor concrete workers: 1.4 (0.73)
Foremen: 0.28 (0.48)
Engineers: 0.09 (0.28)
Unit (i.e. //g/m3): mgny/m3
Monitoring Stations: 16 tunnel
sites visited with sampling equipment
Copollutant (correlation): Total
dust: r - 0.99
~ quartz: r - 0.48
NO2: r - 0.75
CO: r - 0.61
Oil mist: r - 0.83
Oil vapor: r - 0.68
V0C: r - 0.89
PM Increment: NR-exposure respirable dust
Effect Estimate (Lower CI, Upper CI):
Lung function changes predicted by multiple linear regression
models using one exposure variable adjusted for age and
observation time by non-smokers and ever smokers
Non-smokers: B - -16.0
(-24- -6.8)
SE - 4.5
Ever smokers: B - -9.3
(-17-1.6)
SE - 4.0
Reference: Bakke et al.
(2004,156246)
Period of Study: January
1,1989-June 31, 2002
Location: One of
Norway's major
construction companies
Outcome: Spirometric measurements
Age Groups: All ages, mean - 39
yrs
Study Design: cohort
N: 651 male construction workers
Statistical Analyses: Multiple linear
regression models
Covariates: Age, years for non-
smokers and ever smokers
Dose-response Investigated?
No
Statistical Package:
SYSTAT 10.0 and SPSS 11.0
Pollutant: Total dust
Averaging Time: 5-8 h
Mean (SD): Drill and blast workers:
18(7.8)
Tunnel concrete workers: 21 (11)
Shotcreting operators: 73 (41)
TBM workers: 48 (20)
Outdoor concrete workers: 6.5 (3.4)
Foremen: 0.78 (1.3)
Engineers: 0.27 (0.78)
Unit (i.e. //g/m3): mgny/nr1
Monitoring Stations: 16 tunnel
sites visited with sampling equipment
Copollutant (correlation):
Respirable dust: r - 0.99
~ quartz: r - 0.42
NO?: r - 0.67
CO: r - 0.49
Oil mist: r - 0.81
Oil vapor: r - 0.64
V0C: r - 0.91
PM Increment: NR-exposure expirable dust
Lung function changes predicted by multiple linear regression
models using one exposure variable adjusted for age and
observation time by non-smokers and ever smokers
Non-smokers: B - -4.0 (-6.5-1.4)
SE - 1.3
Ever smokers: B - -2.0 (-4.2-0.23)
SE - 1.1
July 2009
E-529
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Bennett et al.
(2007,156268)
Period of Study: 1992-
2005
Location: Melbourne,
Australia
Outcome: Respiratory symptoms
(from questionnaire)
Age Groups: All ages, mean - 37.2
yrs
Study Design: cohort
N:1446
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression models
Covariates: age, gender, use of B2-
agonists, use of inhaled
corticosteroids, smoking, year of
data collection, and avg daily
exposure to PM2.6 in the 12 months
corresponding to the time frame of
symptoms
Dose-response Investigated?
No
Statistical Package: STATA,
version 9
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 6.8
Range (Min, Max): (1.8-73.3)
Monitoring Stations: up to 3
PM Increment: NR
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Respiratory symptoms in last 12 months and exposure to
ambient PM2.6 over the same period
Within-person (longitudinal) effects
Wheeze: OR - 1.08 (0.79-1.48), p - 0.62
SOB on waking: OR - 1.34 (0.84-2.16), p - 0.22
Cough (AM): OR - 0.74 (0.47-1.15), p - 0.18
Phlegm (AM): OR - 1.55 (0.95-2.53), p - 0.08
Cough w/ phlegm (AM): OR - 1.28 (0.70-2.33), p - 0.42
Asthma attack: OR - 0.91 (0.55-1.49), p - 0.69
Between-person (cross-sectional) effects
Wheeze: OR - 1.32 (0.82-2.10), p - 0.25
SOB on waking: OR - 1.29 (0.46-3.60), p - 0.63
Cough (AM): OR - 0.21 (0.07-0.62), p - 0.01
Phlegm (AM): OR - 0.49 (0.16-1.44), p - 0.19
Cough w/ phlegm (AM): OR - 0.28 (0.08-0.97), p - 0.05
Asthma attack: OR - 0.52 (0.17-1.59), p - 0.26
July 2009
E-530
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Allergen sensitivity (any, indoor,
Period of Study: 1999- outdoor, food, total) IgE > 100 lll/mL
Location: The
Netherlands
Asthma (probable, MDdiagnosed,
Location: The ever MD diagnosed)
Reference: (Brauer et al„ Outcome:
2007,090691)
Dry cough at night
Itchy rash
Itchy rashfeczema
Ear/Nose/Throat (ENT) infection
Eczema, MD diagnosed
Eczema, ever MD diagnosed
Flu/serious cold, MDdiagnosed
Wheeze (ever, early, early frequent,
persistent)
Age Groups: very young children
(< 4-years-old) enrolled prenatally
Study Design: prospective birth
cohort study
N: —4000 subjects
Statistical Analyses: multiple
logistic regression
Dose-response Investigated? No
diagnosed)
Bronchitis (MD diagnosed, ever MD-
Averaging Time: 12 months
Mean (SD): SD: NR
16.9
Percentiles: 25th: 14.8
Pollutant: PM2.6
50th(Median): 17.3
75th: 18.1
PM Increment: IQR 3.3 (xglm3
Notes: Traffic-related pollution (PM2.6, soot, NO2) was associated
with respiratory infections, asthma, and allergic sensitization in
children during the first four years of life.
Symptom At 4-Years-0ld
Wheeze
4-years-old: 1.23(1.00: 1.51]
Early-life: 1.20(0.99: 1.46]
Range (Min, Max): (13.5, 25.2) Asthma, MD-diagnosed
Monitoring Stations: 40 4-years-old: 1.15 (0.82: 1.62]
Copollutant (correlation): Soot: r - Early-life: 1.32 (0.96: 1.83]
0.97
4-years-old: 1.11 (0.94: 1.31]
Early-life: 1.14(0.98: 1.33]
Bronchitis, MD-diagnosed
4-years-old: 0.88 (0.66: 1.18]
Early-life: 0.86(0.66: 1.11]
ENT infection
4-years-old: 1.13(0.98: 1.31]
Early-life: 1.17(1.02: 1.34]
Flu/serious cold, MD-diagnosed
4-years-old: 1.21 (1.02: 1.42]
Early-life: 1.25(1.07: 1.46]
Itchy rash
4-years-old: 0.96 (0.82: 1.11]
Early-life: 0.98(0.85: 1.14]
Eczema, MD-diagnosed
4-years-old: 1.00 (0.88: 1.21]
Early-life: 0.98(0.82: 1.17]
Allergen Sensitivity At 4-Yr-0ld
Allergen, any: 1.55(1.13:2.11]
Allergen, indoor: 1.03(0.69: 1.55]
Allergen, outdoor: 0.93(0.54: 1.58]
Allergen, food: 1.75 (1.23: 2.47]
Allergen, total IgE > 100 lU/mL: 0.84 (0.59: 1.18]
Cumulative Allergy/Asthma Symptoms At 4-Years-0ld
Wheeze, ever: 1.22 (1.06: 1.41]
Asthma, ever MD diagnosed: 1.32(1.04: 1.69]
Asthma, probable: 1.08 (0.90:1.30]
Wheeze, early: 1.16(1.00: 1.34]
Wheeze, persistent: 1.19(0.96: 1.48]
Wheeze, early frequent: 1.19 (0.96:1.47]
Bronchitis, ever MD-diagnosed: 0.96 (0.81: 1.13]
Itchy rash/eczema: 0.99 (0.88: 1.13]
Eczema, ever MD diagnosed: 0.98 (0.85:1.13]
July 2009
E-531
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: (Braueret al„
2007,090691)
Period of Study: 1999-
2000
Location: The
Netherlands
Outcome: Allergen sensitivity (any,
indoor, outdoor, food, total)
IgE > 100 lU/mL
Asthma (probable, MDdiagnosed,
ever MD diagnosed)
Bronchitis (MD diagnosed, ever MD-
Dry cough at night
Itchy rash
Itchy rashfeczema
Ear/Nose/Throat (ENT) infection
Eczema, MD diagnosed
Eczema, ever MD diagnosed
Flu/serious cold, MDdiagnosed
Wheeze (ever, early, early frequent,
persistent)
Age Groups: very young children
(< 4-years-old) enrolled prenatally
Study Design: prospective birth
cohort study
N: —4000 subjects
Statistical Analyses: multiple
logistic regression
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: Soot (as PM2.6
absorbance)
Averaging Time: 12 months
Mean (SD): 1.71
Percentiles: 25th: 1.33
50th(Median): 1.78
75th: 1.91
Range (Min, Max):
(0.77,3.68)
Unit (i.e. /yg/m3): 1 E-5/m
Monitoring Stations: 40
Copollutant (correlation):
NO?: r - 0.96
PM2.b: r - 0.97
PM Increment: IQR 0.58 E-5/m
Notes: Traffic-related pollution (PM2.6, soot, NO2) was associated
with respiratory infections, asthma, and allergic sensitization in
children during the first four years of life.
Symptom At 4-Years-0ld
Wheeze
4-years-old: 1.18(0.98: 1.41]
Early-life: 1.18(1.00: 1.40]
Asthma, MD diagnosed
4-years-old: 1.15(0.85: 1.55]
Early-life: 1.30(0.98: 1.71]
Dry cough at night
4-years-old: 1.13(0.97: 1.30]
Early-life: 1.14(1.00: 1.31]
Bronchitis, MD diagnosed
4-years-old: 0.90 (0.69: 1.16]
Early-life: 0.88(0.69: 1.11]
ENT infection
4-years-old: 1.15(1.01: 1.31]
Early-life: 1.16(1.03: 1.31]
Flu/serious cold, MD-diagnosed
4-years-old: 1.18(1.02: 1.36]
Early-life: 1.19(1.04: 1.37]
Itchy rash
4-years-old: 0.94 (0.82: 1.08]
Early-life: 0.97(0.85:1.10]
Eczema, MD-diagnosed
4-years-old: 0.99 (0.84: 1.17]
Early-life: 0.97(0.83:1.14]
Allergen Sensitivity At 4-Yrs-0ld
Allergen, any: 1.45 (1.11:1.91]
Allergen, indoor: 1.02(0.71: 1.46]
Allergen, outdoor: 0.95 (0.59: 1.52]
Allergen, food: 1.64(1.21: 2.23]
Allergen, total IgE > 100 lU/mL: 0.80 (0.59: 1.09]
Cumulative Allergy/Asthma Symptoms At 4-Years-0ld
Wheeze, ever: 1.18 (1.04: 1.34]
Asthma, ever MD diagnosed: 1.26(1.02: 1.56]
Asthma, probable: 1.06 (0.90:1.24]
Wheeze, early: 1.11 (0.97: 1.26]
Wheeze, persistent: 1.18(0.98: 1.42]
Wheeze, early frequent: 1.14 (0.95:1.37]
Bronchitis, ever MD-diagnosed: 0.95 (0.82: 1.10]
Itchy rash/eczema: 0.99 (0.89: 1.11]
Eczema, ever MD diagnosed: 0.99 (0.87:1.12]
July 2009
E-532
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Braueret al.
(2002,035192)
Period of Study: NR
Location: The
Netherlands
Outcome: Questionnaire derived
wheezing, dry nighttime cough, ear,
nose and throat infections, skin rash
Physician diagnosed asthma,
bronchitis, influenza, eczema
Age Groups: age 2
Study Design: Prospective cohort
N: 4146 children
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression
Covariates: Maternal age, maternal
smoking, mattress cover (allergen-
free), maternal education, paternal
education, gender, gas stove, gas
water heater, any other siblings,
ethnicity, breastfeeding, mold at
home, pets, allergies in mother,
allergies in father
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 4 2-week periods
dispersed throughout 1 year, adjusted
for temporal trend
Mean (SD): 16.9
Percentiles: 10th: 14.0
25th: 15.0
50th(Median): 17.3
75th: 18.2
90th: 19.1
Range (Min, Max): 13.5, 25.2
Monitoring Stations: 40
Copollutant (correlation):
Soot: r - 0.99
NO?: r - 0.97
PM Increment: 3.2/yglm3
OR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI];
Unadjusted
Wheeze 1.14(0.99-1.30)
Asthma 1.08(0.84-1.37)
Dry cough at night 1.10 (0.95-1.27)
Bronchitis 1.00 (0.85-1.18)
E, N,T infections 1.14 (0.99-1.33)
Flu 1.15 (1.03-1.28)
Itchy rash 1.07 (0.95-1.20)
Eczema 1.02 (0.90-1.16)
Adjusted
Wheeze 1.14(0.98-1.34)
Asthma 1.12(0.84-1.50)
Dry cough at night 1.04 (0.88-1.23)
Bronchitis 1.04 (0.85-1.26)
E, N,T infections 1.20 (1.01-1.42)
Flu 1.12 (1.00-1.27)
Itchy rash 1.01 (0.88-1.16)
Eczema 0.95 (0.83-1.10)
Reference: Brauer et al.
(2002,035192)
Period of Study: NR
Location: The
Netherlands
Outcome: Questionnaire derived
wheezing, dry nighttime cough, ear,
nose and throat infections, skin rash
Physician diagnosed asthma,
bronchitis, influenza, eczema
Age Groups: age 2
Study Design: Prospective cohort
N: 4146 children
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression
Covariates: Maternal age, maternal
smoking, mattress cover (allergen-
free), maternal education, paternal
education, gender, gas stove, gas
water heater, any other siblings,
ethnicity, breastfeeding, mold at
home, pets, allergies in mother,
allergies in father
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: PM2.6 "soot"
Averaging Time: 4 2-week periods
dispersed throughout 1 year, adjusted
for temporal trend
Mean (SD): 16.9 10-5/m
Percentiles: 10th: 1.16
25th: 1.38
50th(Median): 1.78
75th: 1.92
90th: 2.19
Range (Min, Max):
0.77,3.68
Unit (i.e. /yg/m3): 10-5/m
Monitoring Stations: 40
Copollutant (correlation): PM2.6
(r - 0.99)
NO? (r - 0.96)
PM Increment: 0.54 x 10-5/m
(equivalent to 0.8 /yg/m3 elemental carbon)
OR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
Unadjusted
Wheeze 1.11 [0.99-1.24]
Asthma 1.07(0.87-1.31]
Dry cough at night 1.08 [0.95-1.21]
Bronchitis 0.98 [0.85-1.12]
E, N,T infections 1.12 [0.99-1.27]
Flu 1.13 [1.03-1.23]
Itchy rash 1.07(0.97-1.19]
Eczema 1.01 [0.91-1.13]
Adjusted
Wheeze 1.11 [0.97-1.26]
Asthma 1.12(0.88-1.43]
Dry cough at night 1.02 [0.88-1.17]
Bronchitis 0.99 [0.84-1.17]
E, N,T infections 1.15 [1.00-1.33]
Flu 1.09 [0.98-1.21]
Itchy rash 1.02(0.91-1.15]
Eczema 0.96 [0.85-1.08]
July 2009
E-533
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Braueret al.
(2006,090757)
Period of Study: 1997-
2001
Location: Germany
The Netherlands
Outcome:
Otitis Media (parental report of
doctor's diagnosis prior to age 2
years)
Age Groups: 0-2 years
Study Design: Prospective Cohort
Study
N: 4,379 children total
The Netherlands: 3,714
Germany: 665
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression
Covariates: Sex, parental atopy,
maternal education, siblings,
maternal smoking during pregnancy,
ETS exposure at home, use of gas for
cooking, indoor moulds and
dampness, number of siblings, breast-
feeding, and presence of pets in the
home
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated?
No
Pollutant: PM2.6
PM Component: Elemental Carbon
(EC)
Averaging Time: 8 weeks (4 2-week
periods dispersed throughout 1 year,
adjusted for temporal trends)
Mean: The Netherlands:
PM2.b: 16.9
EC: 1.72
Germany:
PM2.b: 13.4
EC: 1.76
Range (Min, Max):
The Netherlands:
PM2.6:13.5, 25.2
EC: 0.77,3.68
Germany:
PM2.B: 12.0, 21.9
EC: 1.40,4.39
Monitoring Stations: 80 (40 for
each cohort)
PM Increment: PM2b: 3/yglm3 (-
EC: ~ 0.5 //g/m3 (~ IQR)
OR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
The Netherlands:
PM2.6:
At age 1:1.13 (0.98-1.32)
At age 2:1.13 (1.00-1.27)
EC:
At age 1:1.11 (0.98-1.26)
At age 2:1.10 (1.00-1.22)
Germany:
PM2.6:
At age 1:1.19 (0.73-1.92)
At age 2:1.24 (0.84-1.83)
EC:
At age 1:1.12 (0.83-1.51)
At age 2:1.10 (0.86-1.41)
IQR)
Reference: (Burr et al.,
2004,189788)
Period of Study: 3
weeks in July and Jan
1997 and 2 weeks in Nov
1996 and April 1997
Location: North Wales,
England
Outcome: Self-report of symptoms
only for wheeze, cough, phlegm,
rhinitis, and itchy eyes.
Age Groups: all
Study Design: Repeated measures
N: 386 persons in congested streets
and 425 in the uncongested streets
in 1996/1997. Of these, 165 and
283 completed the second phase of
the study.
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: Mean hourly
concentrations
Mean (SD):
Congested Streets
1996-97 21.2
1998-99 16.2
Uncongested Streets
1996-97 6.7
1998-99 4.9
Monitoring Stations: 1 in
congested street and 1 in
uncongested
% change PM10 in congested streets: 23.6
% change PM10 in uncongested streets: 26.6
Uncongested street sampling site was 20 m from the congested
street sampler.
The opening of the by-pass produced a reduction in pollution in
the congested streets. The health effects of these changed are
likely to be greater for nasal and ocular symptoms than for lower
respiratory symptoms. Uncertainty about the causality arises
from low response rates and conflicting trends in respiratory and
nasal symptoms.
July 2009
E-534
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Calderon-
Garciduehas et al. (2006,
091253)
Period of Study: 1999,
2000
Location: Southwest
Mexico City &Tlaxcala,
Mexico
Outcome: Hyperinflation, interstitial
markings-measured by chest
radiograph, and lung function-FVC,
FEVi, PEF, FEF25-75, measured using
spirometry tests
Age Groups: 5-13 yrs
Study Design: Cohortl 999-
N: 249 (total), 230 (Southwest
Mexico City), 19 (Tlaxcala)
Statistical Analyses: Bayes test,
Spearman rank correlation, multiple
regression
Covariates: Age, sex
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS 8.2
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 1 yr
Mean (SD): 21
2000-19
Tlaxacala:
1994-2000: < NAAQS std
Mexico City
Monitoring Stations:
Southwest Mexico City-2
Tlxacala-periodic air monitoring data
Copollutant: 0:i
PM Increment: NR
% Change:
% of children with FEVi < 80% expected value:
Mexico City (n - 77): 7.8%
Tlaxacala (n - 19): 0%
% children with hyperinflation: Mexico City: 65.6%
Number with:
No hyperinflation: 79
Mild: 72
Moderate: 56
Severe: 23
Tlaxacala: 5.3%
Number with:
No hyperinflation: 18
Mild: 1
Moderate: 0
Severe: 0
% children with interstitial markings:
Mexico City: 52.6%
Number with:
No interstitial markings: 19
Mild: 0
Moderate: 0
Severe: 0
Tlaxacala: 0%
Number with:
No interstitial markings: 109
Mild: 112
Moderate: 9
Severe: 0
July 2009
E-535
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Cesaroni et al.
(2008,156326)
Period of Study: Data on
PM emissions collected in
2002
cross-sectional survey
carried out in 1995
Location: Rome, Italy
Outcome: Self-reported chronic
bronchitis or emphysema, asthma,
and rhinitis
Age Groups: 25-59 yrs
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 9,488 subjects who had been
residents in same place for at least 3
yrs and who had participated in an
extension of the ISAAC initiative in
Italy in 1994 & 1995
Statistical Analyses: GEE with a
logit link
Covariates: sex, age, smoking
habits, education level, and variable
to account for correlation of data for
members of the same family
Effect Modifiers: stratified analysis
by smoking status (only presented for
the traffic score variable)
also stratified by education level
(data not shown)
Dose-response Investigated: Wald
test to calculate p for trend
Pollutant: PM emissions (estimated)
Emissions estimated using a
model/method based on factors such
as vehicle park, driving conditions,
emission factors, fuel consumption,
fuel properties, road gradients, and
climatic conditions
Mean: 0.12 kg/km2
SD: 0.081
Odds Ratios for quartiles of PM emissions:
Chronic bronchitis or emphysema (n - 397):
1st: 1.00
2nd: 0.96 (0.71,1.30)
3rd: 0.90(0.66,1.23)
4th: 1.05 (0.77,1.42)
p-trend - 0.871
Asthma (n - 472):
1st: 1.00
2nd: 1.10(0.84,1.44)
3rd: 0.94 (0.71,1.24)
4th: 1.06 (0.80,1.39)
p-trend - 0.980
Rhinitis (n - 1227):
1st: 1.00
2nd: 1.41 (1.17,1.69)
3rd: 1.11 (0.92,1.34)
4th: 1.37 (1.14,1.64)
p-trend - 0.018
Reference: Dales et al.,
(2008,156378)
Period of Study:
Location: Windsor, ON
Outcome: Pulmonary function and
inflammation
Age Groups: grades 4-6
Study Design: cross-sectional
prevalence design
Statistical Analyses: multivariate
linear regression
Covariates: Ethnic background,
smokers at home, pets at home,
acute respiratory illness, medication
use
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: Annual
Mean: 15.4
5th: 14.2
95th: 17.2
Copollutant:
SO?
NO?
Increment: Tertiles of exposure
FEVi:
<15.19: 2.16 ± 0.01
15.19-15.96: 2.17 ± 0.02
>15.96: 2.18 ± 0.01
FVC:
<15.19: 2.51 ± 0.02
15.19-15.96: 2.50 ± 0.02
>15.96: 2.52 ± 0.02
eNO:
<15.19: 16.08 ± 0.70
15.19-15.96: 15.80 ± 0.76
>15.96: 16.79 ± 0.72
July 2009
E-536
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Gauderman et Outcome: FVC, FEVi, MMEF, FEF76
al. (2000, 012531)
Age Groups: fourth, seventh, or
tenth graders
Period of Study: 1993
1997
Location: Southern
California
Study Design: cohort
N: 3035 subjects
Statistical Analyses: Linear
regression
Covariates: Height, weight, BMI,
asthma, smoking, exercise, room
temperature, barometric pressure
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: SAS
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: annual avg of 2-
week avg PM2.6
Mean (SD): PM21, 25.9
Copollutant (correlation):
0a: r - -0.32
PM 10-2.5: r - 0.76
NO?: r - 0.74
Inorg. Acid: r - 0.79
Increment: 25.9/yg/m3
% Change (Lower CI, Upper CI)
PM2.B-4th grade
FVC-0.47 (-0.94,0.01)
FEVi-0.64 (-1.28, 0.01)
MMEF-1.03 (-1.95 to-0.09)
FEF76 -1.31 (-2.57 to-0.03)
PM2.B-7th grade
FVC -0.42 (-0.89, 0.05)
FEVi-0.32 (-0.88, 0.24)
MMEF-0.29 (-1.99,1.44)
FEFjb -0.26 (-1.75,1.25)
PM2.B-10th grade
FVC 0.19 (-0.68,1.07)
FEVi-0.25 (-1.41, 0.93)
MMEF-0.17 (-3.66, 3.46)
FEFjb-0.79 (-4.27, 2.82)
Reference: Gauderman et Outcome: Lung function
al. (2002, 026013)
Period of Study: 1996-
2000
Location: Southern
California
development: FEVi, maximal
midexpiratory flow (MMEF)
Age Groups: Fourth grade children
(avg age - 9.9 yrs)
Study Design: Cohort study
N: 1678 children, 12 communities
Statistical Analyses: Mixed model
linear regression
Covariates: Height, BMI, doctor-
diagnosed asthma and cigarette
smoking in previous year, respiratory
illness and exercise on day of test,
interaction of each of these variables
with sex, barometric pressure,
temperature at test time, indicator
variables for field technician and
spirometer
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: SAS (10)
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: Annual 24 h
averages
Mean (SD): The avg levels were
presented in an online data
supplement (Figure E1)
PM Component: Elemental carbon
and organic carbon.
Monitoring Stations: 12
Copollutant (correlation):
O3: (10 AM to 6 PM) r - 0.14
O3: r = -0.39
NO2: r - 0.77
Acid vapor: r - 0.87
PM10: r - 0.95
PM 10-2.5: r - 0.81
EC: r - 0.93
0C: r - 0.89
PM Increment: 22.2/yglm3
Association Estimate:
Non-statistically significant negative correlation between PM2.6
and FEViand FVC growth rates were observed. MMEF growth
rates had a negative correlation with PM2.6 (r - -0.43 p - 0.05).
PM2.6 was not significantly correlated to FEVi (r - -0.31
p - 0.25)
July 2009
E-537
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: (Gauderman
et al., 2004, 056569)
Period of Study: Air
pollution data
ascertainment: 1994-
2000. Spirometry testing:
spring 2001- spring 2003
Location: 12
Communities in Southern
California
Outcome: Lung function
FVC, FEVi, MMEF (Maximal
midexpiratory flow rate)
Age Groups: Children, Avg age 10
years
Study Design: Prospective Cohort
Study
N: 12 Communities
2,034 children
24,972 child-months
Statistical Analyses: Linear
regression of changes in sex-and-
community specific lung growth
function and PM
Correlation between % with low
attained FEVi and PM.
Covariates: Random effect for
communities
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Pollutant: PM2.6
PM Increment: Most to least polluted community Range:
22.8 /yglm3
Difference in Lung Growth [Lower CI, Upper CI];
Mean: Means are presented in figures FVC -60.1 (-166.1 to 45.9)
FEVi -79.7 (-153.0 to j6.4)
MMEF-168.9 (-345.5 to 7.8)
Correlation with % below 80% predicted Lung function (p-value)
PM2.b: 0.79 (0.002)
Averaging Time: 2-week
measurements used to create annual
averages
only
Range (Min, Max): ~6, —27
Monitoring Stations: 12
Copollutant (correlation): PMio: r
- 0.95
0s:r - 0.18
NO2: r - 0.79
EC: r - 0.91
0C: r - 0.91
Reference: Gauderman et
al. (2007, 090121)
Period of Study: 1993-
2004
Location: 12 Southern
California Communities
Outcome: pulmonary function tests
FVC, FEVi, MMEF/FEF26.76
Age Groups: Children (mean age 10
at recruitment, followed for 8 years)
Study Design: Cohort Study
(Children's Health Study)
N: 3677 children (1718 in cohort 1
recruited 1993 and 1959 in cohort 2
recruited 1996)
22686 pulmonary function tests.
Statistical Analyses: Hierarchical
mixed effects model with linear
splines
Covariates: Adjustments for height,
height squared, BMI, BMI squared,
present asthma status, exercise or
respiratory illness on day of test,
smoking in previous year, field
technician, traffic indicator (distance
from freeway, distance from major
roads), random effects for participant
and community.
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Pollutant: PM2.6
Monitoring Stations: 1 in each
community
PM Increment: 22.8/yglm3
Pollutant effect reported as difference in 8 year lung function
growth from least to most polluted community. Negative
difference indicate growth deficits associated with exposure. For
PM2.6 FEV growth deficit is ¦ 100
Reference: Gehring et al.
(2002, 036250)
Period of Study: 1995-
2002
Location: Munich,
Germany
Outcome: wheezing, cough without
infection, dry cough at night,
obstructive, spastic or asthmoid
bronchitis, respiratory infections,
sneezing, runny/stuffed nose
Age Groups: 0-2 years
Study Design: Prospective cohort
N: 1756 infants
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression
Covariates: sex, parental atopy
(yes/no), maternal education, siblings
(y/n), environmental tobacco smoke
_atJiome_J^/n);_use_of_2as_^oi^cookin2_
Pollutant: PM2.6
Mean (SD): PM2.6 mass: 13.4
PM2.6 absorb. 1.77 * 10-5/m
Percentiles: PM2.6 mass:
10th: 12.2
25th: 12.5
50th(Median): 13.1
75th: 14.0
90th: 14.9
PM2.6 absorbance:
PM Increment: PM2.6 mass: 1.5/yglm3
PM2.6 absorb. 0.4 * 10-5/m (IQR)
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
Wheeze (PM2.5 mass)
Age of 1 yr: All: 0.91 (0.76-1.09)
Males: 0.91 (0.72-1.16)
Females: 0.94 (0.70-1.27)
Age of 2 years: All: 0.96 (0.83-1.12)
Males: 0.93 (0.76-1.14)
Females: 1.04 (0.83-1.30)
July 2009
E-538
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
(yfn), home dampness (y/n), indoor
moulds (y/n), keeping of dogs (y/n)
and cats (y/n) study (GINI or LISA)
Dose-response Investigated? No
10th: 1.47 * 10-5
25th: 1.54* 10-5
50th(Median): 1.70 * 10-5
75th: 1.88 *10-5
90th: 2.13*10-5
Range (Min, Max):
PM2.6 mass: 11.9, 21.9
PM2.6 absorbance:
1.38 to 4.39 * 10-5
PM2.6 mass:
PM2.6 absorbance: 1/m
PM Component: PM2.B mass
PM2.E absorbance (as a marker of
diesel soot)
Monitoring Stations: 40
Copollutant (correlation):
NO2: r - 0.99
PM2.6 absorbance and NO2: r - 0.95
PM2.6 mass and PM2.6 absorbance:
r - 0.96
Cough W/O Infection (PM2.B mass)
Age of 1 yr: All: 1.34 (1.11-1.61)
Males: 1.43 (1.14-1.80)
Females: 1.19(0.84-1.70)
Dry Cough At Night (PM2.B mass)
Age of 1 yr: All: 1.31 (1.07-1.60)
Males: 1.39 (1.08-1.78)
Females: 1.17 (0.81-1.68)
Age of 2 years: All: 1.20 (1.02-1.42)
Males: 1.25 (1.01-1.55)
Females: 1.13(0.86-1.48)
Bronchitis (PM2.B mass)
Age of 1 yr: All: 0.98 (0.80-1.20)
Males: 0.97 (0.76-1.25)
Females: 0.98 (0.68-1.41)
Age of 2 years: All: 0.92 (0.78-1.09)
Males: 0.92 (0.74-1.14)
Females: 0.91 (0.68-1.21)
Resp Infections (PM2.B mass)
Age of 1 yr: All: 1.04 (0.91-1.19)
Males: 1.04 (0.87-1.25)
Females: 1.06 (0.87-1.31)
Age of 2 years: All: 0.98 (0.80-1.20)
Males: 0.99 (0.74-1.31): Females: 0.98 (0.73-1.31)
Sneezing/Runny Nose (PM2.5 mass)
Age of 1 yr: All: 1.01 (0.85-1.20)
Males: 0.97 (0.77-1.24)
Females: 1.08 (0.84-1.41)
Age of 2 years: All: 0.96 (0.82-1.12)
Males: 0.91 (0.73-1.12)
Females: 1.04 (0.83-1.31)
Wheeze (PM2.B absorbance)
Age of 1 yr: All: 0.93 (0.78-1.12)
Males: 0.91 (0.71-1.15)
Females: 1.01 (0.74-1.37)
Age of 2 years: All: 0.98 (0.84-1.14)
Males: 0.92 (0.75-1.13)
Females: 1.07 (0.85-1.36)
Cough W/0 Infection (PM2.B absorbance)
Age of 1 yr: All: 1.32 (1.10-1.59)
Males: 1.38 (1.11-1.71)
Females: 1.25 (0.87-1.78)
Dry Cough At Night (PM2 e absorbance)
Age of 1 yr: All: 1.27 (1.04-1.55)
Males: 1.31 (1.04-1.67)
July 2009
E-539
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Females: 1.16(0.79-1.71)
Age of 2 years: All: 1.16 (0.98-1.37)
Males: 1.17 (0.95-1.44)
Females: 1.12(0.84-1.48)
Bronchitis (PM2.6 absorbance)
Age of 1 yr: All: 0.99 (0.81-1.22)
Males: 1.00 (0.78-1.27)
Females: 0.94 (0.63-1.39)
Age of 2 years: All: 0.94 (0.79-1.12)
Males: 0.91 (0.72-1.13)
Females: 0.95 (0.71-1.28)
Resp Infections (PM2.5 absorbance)
Age of 1 yr: All: 1.03 (0.90-1.18)
Males: 1.03 (0.86-1.23)
Females: 1.05 (0.85-1.30)
Age of 2 years: All: 0.99 (0.80-1.22)
Males: 0.96 (0.73-1.26)
Females: 1.04 (0.75-1.43)
Sneezing/Runny Nose (PM2.5 absorbance)
Age of 1 yr: All: 0.95 (0.79-1.14)
Males: 0.90 (0.70-1.16)
Females: 1.06 (0.80-1.39)
Age of 2 years: All: 0.92 (0.78-1.09)
Males: 0.83 (0.66-1.05)
Females: 1.06 (0.83-1.34))
Reference: Goss et al. Outcome: Cystic Fibrosis pulmonary
(2004, 055624) exacerbations, FEVi
Period of Study: 1999- Age Groups: Children and adults
2000 over the age of 6
Location: USA Study Design: cohort
N: 11484 patients
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression, t-tests, Mann-Whitney
tests, Chi-squared tests, polytomous
regression, multiple linear regression
Covariates: Age, sex, lung function,
weight, insurance status, pancreatic
insufficiency, airway colonization,
genotype, median household income
by census tract, zipcode.
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: STATA, SAS
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: annual mean of
24 h averages
Mean (SD): 13.7(4.2)
Percentiles: 25th: 11.8
50th(Median): 13.9
75th: 15.9
Monitoring Stations: 713
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Odds Ratio Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Odds of having 2 or more pulmonary exacerbations as compared
to 1 or less in 2000
1.21 (1.07-1.33)
Odds of having 1 pulmonary exacerbation as compared to no
exacerbations in 2000
0.70 (0.59-0.98)
Decrease in FEVi 155ml(115-194)
Decrease in FEVi in 2000 after adjusting for FEVi in 1999
24ml(7-40)
July 2009
E-540
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Hertz-
Picciotto et al. (2005,
088678)
Period of Study: May
1994 to March 1999
Location: Teplice and
Prachatice, Czech
Republic
Outcome: Developmental
immunotoxicity as assessed by
neonatal immunophenotypes
Age Groups: Not specified: every
woman who delivered in the two
aforementioned districts were asked
to participate
Study Design: Cohort study
N: 1397 mother-infant pairs
Statistical Analyses: Multiple linear
regression with lymphocyte
percentage as responding variable
and pollutant exposure to 14day
averaging period before the date of
cord blood collection
Covariates: Season, length of labor,
parity, number of previous stillbirths,
medication during delivery, working
status of mother, maternal education,
exposure to active and secondhand
smoke, family history of allergy, self-
reports of workplace exposure to
dust during pregnancy, self-reported
maternal chronic or severe
respiratory diseases during
pregnancy. Ambient temperature and
season were controlled for.
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: SUDAAN
(version 8)
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
14 day averages
Mean (SD): Overall 24 h: 24.8
14 day avg:
Teplice: 30.1
Prachatice 19.8
PM Component: PAHs
Monitoring Stations: 2 stations:
Teplice and Prachatice
PM Increment: 25//g|m3
Adjusted for 3-day temperature and season, PM2.6 exposure
during the 14 days before birth was associated with reduced T-
lymphocyte fractions CD4+, CD3+ and an increase in B-
lymphocyte fraction (CD19+).
The associations were not quantitatively reported anywhere else
in the paper other than in Figure 2 and Table 3
Reference: (Hertz-
Picciotto et al., 2007,
135917)
Period of Study: 1994-
98 + follow-ups at up to
4.5 years of age for child
Location: Czech Republic
districts of Teplice and
Prachatice
Outcome: Lower respiratory
illnesses, majority being acute
laryngitis, tracheitis, bronchitis.
ICD10 codes J04 and J20
Age Groups: Birth-4.5 years of
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: Used 3, 7,14, 30
and 45 day averages
Mean (SD): daily mean 22.3
(sd 16 for 3 day avg, 11 for 45 day
Study Design: longitudinal follow up avg)
of a stratified random sample of
mother-infant pairs from previous
Pregnancy Outcome Study. Low birth
weight and preterm births sampled at
higher fractions.
N: 1133 children
Statistical Analyses: Generalized
linear longitudinal models, GEE to
adjust for within subject correlations,
robust variance estimates were
obtained. Model fit judged using
Akaike Information criterion.
Covariates: age of child, breast
feeding, environmental tobacco
smoke, season, day of week, year of
birth, gender, birth weight, pregnancy
data including age at delivery, length
of gestation, maternal hypertension
and diabetes, infant APGAR score,
maternal work history, demographics,
lifestyle, reproductive and medical
histories, temperature, fuel type,
other children in household
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SUDAAN
version 8
PM Increment: 25//g|m3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Bronchitis, birth-23 months of age
Categorical model
High 30 day avg PM2.6 (greater than 50 //g|m3)
2.26(1.81-2.82)
Medium 30 day avg PM2.6 (between 25 and 50 /yg/m3)
1.48(1.32-1.65)
Continuous model
1.30(1.08-1.58)
Bronchitis, 2-4.5 years of age
Categorical model
High 30 day avg PM2.6 (greater than 50 /yg/m3)
3.66(2.07-6.48)
Medium 30 day avg PM2.6 (between 25 and 50 /yglm3)
1.60(1.41-1.82)
Continuous model
1.23(0.94-1.62)
Notes: Results of other averaging periods shown in plots.
July 2009
E-541
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: (Hogervorst et
al„ 2006,156559)
Period of Study: NR
Location: Maastricht, the
Netherlands (six schools
selected)
Outcome:
Decreased lung function
Age Groups: 8-13 years old
Study Design: Multivariate linear
regression (enter method) analysis
N: 342 children
Statistical Analyses: ANOVA, Chi
square
Covariates: Independent variables:
Age, height, gender, smoking at home
by parents, pets, use of ventilation
hoods during cooking, presence of
unvented geysers, tapestry in the
home, indoor/outdoor time, education
level of parents.
Dependent variables: lung function
indices
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: PM2.6
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Averaging Time: Daily
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
Mean (SD): 19.0 (3.2)
lag:
Monitoring Stations: 6
FEV
Copollutant:
3.62(0.50,7.63]
PM10
FVC
TSP
1.80 [-2.10, 5.80]
FEF
5.93 [-2.34,14.89]
Reference: Islam et al.
(2007,090697)
Period of Study: 1993-
2001
Location: 12 communities
in Southern California,
U.S.
Outcome: New onset asthma
Age Groups: 9-10 years
Study Design: cohort
N:2057
Statistical Analyses: Cox
proportional hazard model
Covariates: Community, sex,
race/ethnicity
Season: all
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS V 9.1
Lags Considered: 0-2 years
Pollutant: PM2.6
Range (Min, Max):
"Low" PM2.6 Communities
(5.7-8.5)
"High" PM2.6 Communities
(13.7-29.5)
Monitoring Stations: 12
Copollutant: NO2, acid vapor, PM10
and elemental and organic carbon
correlated as a "non-ozone package"
of pollutants with a similar pattern
relative to each other across the 12
communities.
PM Increment: NR
IR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
Low PM
FVC ~ 90: 19.4 (7.5,50.5)
FVC 90-110: 16.8(7.0, 40.1)
FVC >110: 7.9(2.9,21.9)
FEVi ~ 90: 23.7 (9.4, 59.4)
FEVi 90-110:15.6(6.5, 37.4)
FEVi >110: 6.5(2.3,18.7)
FEF25-75 ~ 90: 21.1 (8.8, 50.5)
FEF2B.7B 90-110:11.9 (4.7, 30.0)
FEF25-75 >110: 6.4(2.3,18.2)
Overall: 14.2(7.0, 28.7)
High PM
FVC ~ 90: 14.2(5.1,39.6)
FVC 90-110: 25.6(11.1,59.2)
FVC >110: 16.7 (6.5,42.9)
FEVi ~ 90: 20.8 (8.0, 54.0)
FEVi 90-110: 23.1 (10.0, 53.7)
FEVi >110: 18.8(7.5,47.3)
FEF25-75~ 90: 23.8(10.2,55.6)
FEF2B7B 90-110: 23.9 (9.9, 57.7)
FEF25-75 >110:15.9(6.3,40.5)
Overall: 18.4(9.4, 35.9)
July 2009
E-542
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Karr et al.
(2007,090719)
Period of Study: 1995 to
2000
Location: South Coast Air
Basin of southern
California
Outcome: Bronchioloitis
Study Design: Case-control. Cases
included subjects with a record of a
single hospitalization with a dis-
charge diagnosis of acute bronchio-
litis.10 controls per case were
matched on birth date and gesta-
tional age.
N: 18,595 cases
169,472 controls
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression to estimate
relative risk of hospitalization for
bronchiolitis.
Covariates: Confounders included in
the model were: gender, parity,
chronic lung disease, cardiac and
pulmonary anomalies, SES covariates
Age, gestational age, and season of
birth were controlled for by matching
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: STATA
(Version 8)
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h (lifetime
monthly avg from birth & 30 days
preceding cases hospitalization)
Mean (SD): 25
Percentiles: 25th: 19
50th(Median): 23
75th: 29
Range (Min, Max): 6 to 111
Monitoring Stations: 17
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
Sub-chronic and chronic exposure: OR - 1.09 (1.04-1.14)
Adjusted for adjusted: Sub-chronic OR - 1.10(1.04,1.16)
Chronic OR - 1.09 (1.03-1.15)
Adjusted for CO and NO2: Sub-chronic OR - 1.14 (1.07,1.21)
Chronic OR - 1.12(1.06,1.20)
Adjusted for O3, CO, and NO2: Chronic OR - 1.15 (1.08,1.22)
Sub-chronic OR - 1.13(1.06,1.21)
Reference: (Kim et al.,
2004, 087383)
Period of Study: Mar-
June (spring) 2001
Sep-Nov (fall) 2001
Location: Alameda
County, CA
Outcome: Asthma, bronchitis
Age Groups: Children (grades 3-5)
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 1109 children, 871 (long term
resident children), 462 (long term
related females), 403 (long term
related males)
Statistical Analyses: 2-stage
multiple logistic regression model
Covariates: respiratory illness before
age of 2, household mold/moisture,
pests, maternal history of asthma
(for asthma) Season: spring and fall
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: SAS 8.2
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 10 weeks
Mean (SD): Study Avg 12
Monitoring Stations: 10
Copollutant (correlation): r2 is
approximately 0.9 for all
copollutants-Black Carbon (BC),
PM10, NOx, NO2, NO (NOX-NO2)
PM Increment: 0.7 (IQR)
OR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Bronchitis
All subjects: 1.02(1.00,1.08]
LTR subjects: 1.03 [1.01,1.08]
LTR females: 1.04(1.02,1.05]
LTR males: 1.02(0.99,1.05]
Asthma
All subjects: 1.00 [0.96,1.12]
LTR subjects: 1.01 [0.97,1.06]
LTR females: 1.06 [0.99,1.15]
LTR males: 0.99(0.95,1.04]
Asthma excluding outlier school having a larger proportion of
Hispanics
All subjects: 1.04[0.96,1.12]
LTR subjects: 1.03 [0.94,1.13]
LTR females: 1.03 [0.91,1.17]
LTR males: 1.03[0.94,1.18]
July 2009
E-543
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Leonardi et al.
(2000,010272)
Period of Study: 1996
Location: 17 cities of
Central Europe (Bulgaria,
Czech Republic, Hungary,
Poland, Romania,
Slovakia)
Outcome: Immune biomarkers
Age Groups: 9-11
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 366 school children
Statistical Analyses: Linear
regression
Covariates: Age, gender, parental
smoking, laboratory of analysis,
recent respiratory illness
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: STATA
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: annual PM2.6
Mean (SD): PMz.b: 46 (10)
Range (Min, Max):
PM2.6: (29, 67)
5th, median, 81 95th percentile
PM2.6: 29, 44, 67
% Change (Lower CI, Upper CI)
p-value
PM2.6
Neutrophils -10 (-45, 46)
>.20
Total lymphocytes 49 (11,101); .008
B lymphocytes 63 (4,155); .034
Total T lymphocytes 72 (32
123)
<.001
CD4+ 80 (34
143)
<.001
CD8+61 (17,119); .003
CD4/CD8 16 (-17, 62)
>.20
NK 63 (3,158); .035
Total IgG 24 (2, 52); .034
Total IgM-9 (-32, 22)
>.20
Total IgA-1 (-25, 32)
>.20
Total IgE -4 (-61,137)
>.20
Reference: McConnell
(1999,007028)
Period of Study: 1993
Location: Southern
California
Outcome: Bronchitis, chronic cough,
phlegm
Age Groups: Children: 4th, 7th, 81
10th graders
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 3676 people
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression
Covariates: Age, sex, race, grade,
health insurance
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: Yearly 2 wk avg
Mean (SD): 15.3
Range (Min, Max): 6.7, 31.5
Copollutant (correlation):
NO2
r - 0.83
0s
r - 0.50
Acid
r - 0.71
Child Respiratory symptoms OR Estimate (Lower CI, Upper
CI)
PM2.5 Increment: 15 //gfm3
Children w) asthma
Bronchitis: 1.4 (0.9, 2.3)
Phlegm: 2.6 (1.2, 5.4)
Cough: 1.3 (0.7, 2.4)
Children wf wheeze, no asthma
Bronchitis: 0.9 (0.6,1.4)
Phlegm: 1.0 (0.6,1.8)
Cough: 1.1 (0.6,1.9)
Children wf no wheeze, no asthma
Bronchitis: 0.5 (0.3,1.0)
Phlegm: 0.8 (0.4,1.5)
Cough: 0.9 (0.6,1.3)
July 2009
E-544
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: McConnell et
al. (2003, 049490)
Period of Study: 1993-
99
Outcome: bronchitic symptoms
Age Groups: 9-19
Study Design: communities selected
on basis of historic levels of criteria
Location: 12 Southern CA pollutants and low residential
communities mobility.
N: 475 children
Statistical Analyses: 3 stage
regression combined to give a logistic
mixed effects model
Covariates: sex, ethnicity, allergies
history, asthma history, SES,
insurance status, current wheeze,
current exposure to ETS, personal
smoking status, participation in team
sports, in utero tobacco exposure
through maternal smoking, family
history of asthma, amount of time
routinely spent outside by child
during 2-6 pm.
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS Glimmix
macro
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 4 year averages
Mean (SD): 13.8(7.7)
Range (Min, Max): 5.5-28.5
Copollutant (correlation): PMio: r
- 0.79
PM 10-2.5: r - 0.24
Inorganic acid: r - 0.76
Organic Acid: r - 0.58
EC: r - 0.83
0C:r - 0.84
NO?: r - 0.54
0s:r - 0.72
PM Increment: Between community range 23//g|m3
Between community unit 1 //g|m3
Within community 1 //g|m3
OR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
Between community per range
1.81(1.14-2.88)
Between Community per unit
1.03(1.01-1.05)
Within community per unit
1.09(1.01-1.17)
Reference: McConnell et
al. (2003, 049490)
Period of Study: 1993-
99
Outcome: bronchitic symptoms
Age Groups: 9-19
Study Design: communities selected
on basis of historic levels of criteria
Location: 12 Southern CA pollutants and low residential
communities mobility.
N: 475 children
Statistical Analyses: 3 stage
regression combined to give a logistic
mixed effects model
Covariates: sex, ethnicity, allergies
history, asthma history, SES,
insurance status, current wheeze,
current exposure to ETS, personal
smoking status, participation in team
sports, in utero tobacco exposure
through maternal smoking, family
history of asthma, amount of time
routinely spent outside by child
during 2-6 pm.
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS Glimmix
macro
Pollutant: Elemental Carbon
Averaging Time: 4 year avg
Mean (SD): 0.71(0.41)
Range (Min, Max): 0.1-1.2
Copollutant (correlation): PM2 e: r
- 0.83
PM10: r - 0.71
PM 10-2.5: r - 0.30
Inorganic acid: r - 0.82
Organic Acid: r - 0.66
Organic Carbon: r - 0.88
NO?: r - 0.54
O3: r - 0.68
PM Increment: Between community range 1.1 //g|m3
Between community unit 1 /yglm3
Within community 1 /yglm3
OR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
Between community per range
1.64(1.06-2.54)
Between Community per unit
1.55(1.05-2.30)
Within community per unit
2.63(0.83-8.33)
July 2009
E-545
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: McConnell et
al. (2003, 049490)
Period of Study: 1993-
99
Outcome: bronchitic symptoms
Age Groups: 9-19
Study Design: communities selected
on basis of historic levels of criteria
Location: 12 Southern CA pollutants and low residential
communities mobility.
N: 475 children
Statistical Analyses: 3 stage
regression combined to give a logistic
mixed effects model
Covariates: sex, ethnicity, allergies
history, asthma history, SES,
insurance status, current wheeze,
current exposure to ETS, personal
smoking status, participation in team
sports, in utero tobacco exposure
through maternal smoking, family
history of asthma, amount of time
routinely spent outside by child
during 2-6 pm.
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS Glimmix
macro
Pollutant: Organic Carbon
Averaging Time: 4 year avg
Mean (SD): 4.5(2.7)
Range (Min, Max): 1.4-11.6
Copollutant (correlation): PM2 e: r
- 0.84
PM10: r - .70
PM 10-2.5: r - 0.27
Inorganic acid: r - 0.83
Organic Acid: r - 0.69
EC: r - 0.88
NO?: r - 0.67
O3: r - 0.81
PM Increment: Between community range 10.2//g|m3
Between community unit 1 //g|m3
Within community 1 //g|m3
OR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
Between community per range
1.74(0.89-3.4)
Between Community per unit
1.06(0.99-1.13)
Within community per unit
1.41(1.12-1.78)
Reference: McConnell, et Outcome:
al. (2006,180226)
Period of Study: 1996-
1999
Location: 12 Southern
California communities
Prevalence of bronchitic symptoms
(yearly).
Age Groups: 10-15-years-old
Study Design: longitudinal cohort
N: 475 asthmatic children
Statistical Analyses: Multilevel
logistic mixed effects models.
Covariates: age, second-hand smoke
personal smoking history
sex, race.
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 365 days
Percentiles: Community by year
(n - 48 - 12 communities ~ 4
years)
25th: NR
50th(Median): 3.4
75th: NR
Range (Min, Max):
Community by year (n - 48 - 12
communities ~ 4 years):
(0.89,8.7)
Monitoring Stations: 12
Copollutant:
0s
NO?
EC
0C
Acid vapor (acetic and formic acid)
PM Increment: 3.4 |Jg|m3
OR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
PM2.6
Dog (n - 292): 1.56(1.15: 2.12]
No dog (n - 183): 1.03(0.71: 1.49]
PM2.6*Dog interaction p-value: 0.06
Cat (n - 202): 1.30 [0.90:1.88]
No Cat (n - 273): 1.36 [0.99:1.83]
PM2.6*Cat interaction p-value: 0.87
Neither pet (n - 112): 1.11 [0.71:1.74]
Cat only (n - 71): 0.85 [0.46:1.57]
Dog only (n - 161): 1.53 [1.04: 2.25]
Both pets (n - 131): 1.58 [1.02: 2.46]
Results suggest that dog ownership, a source of residential
exposure to endotoxin, may worsen the severity of respiratory
symptoms from exposure to air pollutants in asthmatic children.
Although PM2.6 was associated at a statistically significant level
with ownership of both cats and dogs, it appears that dog
ownership (with or without a cat) specifically worsens the
association between PM2.6 and respiratory symptoms in
asthmatic children.
July 2009
E-546
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: (Meng et al„
2007, 093275)
Outcome: Poorly controlled asthma
vs. controlled asthma
Period of Study:
November 2000 and
September 2001
ICD9NR
Age Groups: 18-64, 65 +
Location: Los Angeles and studY Design: Long-term exposure
San Diego counties stuc'V
comparison of cases and controls
N: 1,609 adults (represented
individuals age 18+ who reported
ever having been diagnosed as having
asthma by a physician and had their
address successfully geocoded)
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression to evaluate associations
between TD (traffic density) and
annual avg air pollution
concentrations and poorly controlled
asthma. Used sample weights that
adjusted for unequal probabilities of
selection into the CHIS sample.
Covariates: Age, sex, race/ethnicity,
family federal poverty level, county,
insurance status, delay in care for
asthma, taking medications, smoking
behavior, self-reported health status,
employment, physical activity
Dose-response Investigated? yes
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-hs
Copollutant (correlation):
0s: r - -0.76
NO?: r - 0.87
PMio: r - 0.84
CO: r - 0.52
TD: r - 0.13
Results for PM2.6 were nonsignificant and not reported
quantitatively.
Reference: Millstein, J et
al. (2004, 088629)
Period of Study: Mar-
Aug, 1995, and Sep, 1995
to Feb, 1996
Data were taken from the
Children's Health Study
Location: Alpine,
Atascadero, Lake
Arrowhead, Lake Elsinore,
Lancaster, Lompoc, Long
Beach, Mira Loma,
Riverside, San Dimas,
Santa Maria, and Upland,
CA
Outcome: Wheezing 81 asthma
medication use (ICD 9 NR)
Age Groups: 4th grade students,
mostly 9 yrs at the time of the study
Study Design: Cohort Study,
stratified into 2 seasonal groups/
N: 2081 enrolled, 2034 provided
parent-completed questionnaire.
Statistical Analyses: Multilevel,
mixed-effects logistic model.
Covariates: Contagious respiratory
disease, ambient airborne pollen and
other allergens, temperature, sex, age
race, allergies, pet cats, carpet in
home, environmental tobacco smoke,
heating fuel, heating system, water
damage in home, education level of
questionnaire signer, physician
diagnosed asthma.
Season: Mar-Aug, 1995, and Sep,
1995 to Feb, 1996
Statistical Package: GLIMMIX SAS
8.00 macro for generalized linear
mixed models.
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: Integrated values
for successive 2-wk periods
PM Component: Nitric acid, formic
acid, acetic acid
Monitoring Stations: 1 central
location in each community
Copollutant (correlation):
O3: r - 0.09
NO?: r - 0.28
PM10: r = 0.33
PM 10-2.5: r - -0.08
PM Increment: IQR: 5.24/yg/m3
Odds Ratio [lower CI, Upper CI]
Annual
PM2.6: 1.04(0.83,1.29]
March-August
PM2.6: 0.91 [0.64,1.30]
Sep-Feb
PM2.6: 1.18(0.89,1.58]
Lags Considered: 14
July 2009
E-547
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Morgenstern
et al. (2007, 090747)
Period of Study: Mar
1999-Jul 2000
Location: Munich,
Germany
Outcome: Asthma, wheezing,
spastic/obstructive bronchitis. Dry
cough at night, respiratory infections,
sneezing, runny/stuffed nose without
a cold.
Age Groups: at 1 yr & at 2 yrs
Study Design: Cohort
N: 3577 children for the prediction
models. Respiratory data available for
3129 children at 1 yr.
Statistical Analyses: Pearson's
correlation coefficient, prediction
error expressed as root mean squared
error (RMSE), multiple logistic
regression with confounding factors,
odds ratios
Covariates: Sex, Parental atopy
(genetic predisposition to allergies),
environmental tobacco smoke at
home, maternal education > or <12
yrs, sibling, gas stove, home
dampness, indoor mold, pets. Since it
was not feasible to measure personal
exposure to NO2, PM2.6, and PM2.6
absorbance, exposure modeling was
used.
Statistical Package: SAS V.8.02
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: annual
Mean (SD): 12.8
Percentiles: 25th: 12.5
50th(Median): 12.9
75th: 13.3
Range (Min, Max): 6.8,15.3
Monitoring Stations: 40: traffic,
n - 17 and background, n - 23.
Copollutant (correlation):
PM2.6 absorbance r - 0.49
NO2 r - 0.45
PM Increment: 1.04/yg/m3
Odds Ratio [Lower CI, Upper CI]
Adjusted OR for PM2.6 and: sneezing, runny/stuffed nose during
the first year of life was 1.16 [1.01,1.34]
At age 1 yr
For wheezing 1.01 [0.87,1.18]
For cough without infection 1.05 [0.88,1.25]
For dry cough at nightl .08 [0.86,1.27]
For asthmatic, spastic, or obstructive bronchitis
1.04 [0.90,1.29]
For respiratory infectionl .05 [0.88,1.22]
For sneezing, runny or stuffed nose 1.16 [1.01,1.34]
At age 2 yrs
For wheezing 1.10 [0.96,1.25]
For cough without infection NA, insufficient sample
For dry cough at night 1.03 [0.86,1.19]
For asthmatic, spastic, or obstructive bronchitis
1.05[0.92,1.20]
For respiratory infection 1.09 [0.94,1.07]
For sneezing, runny or stuffed nose 1.19 [1.04,1.36]
Reference: Morgenstern
et al. (2007, 090747)
Period of Study: Ma4
1999-Jul 2000
Location: Munich,
Germany
Outcome: Asthma, wheezing,
spastic/obstructive bronchitis. Dry
cough at night, respiratory infections,
sneezing, runny/stuffed nose without
a cold.
Age Groups: at 1 yr & at 2 yrs
Study Design: Cohort
N: 3577 children for the prediction
models. Respiratory data were
available for 3129 children at 1 yr.
Statistical Analyses: Pearson's
correlation coefficient, prediction
error expressed as root mean squared
error (RMSE), multiple logistic
regression with confounding factors,
odds ratios
Covariates: Sex, Parental atopy
(genetic predisposition to allergies),
environmental tobacco smoke at
home, maternal education > or <12
yrs, sibling, gas stove, home
dampness, indoor mold, pets. Since it
was not feasible to measure personal
exposure to NO2, PM2.6, and PM2.6
absorbance, exposure modeling was
used.
Statistical Package: SAS V.8.02
Pollutant: PM2.6 Absorbance (PM2.6
ab)
Averaging Time: annual
Mean (SD): 1.7 10 -5 m -1,
Percentiles: 25th: 1.610 —5 m -1
50th(Median): 1.7 10 -5 m -1
75th: 1.8 10 -5 m -1
Range (Min, Max):
1.3, 3.2 10 -5 m -1
Unit (i.e. /yg/m3): 10 -5 m -1
Monitoring Stations: 40: traffic,
n - 17 and background, n - 23.
PM Increment: 0.22 x 10 -5
Odds Ratio [Lower CI, Upper CI]
no lag
At age 1 yr
For wheezing 0.97 [0.77,1.23]
For cough without infection 1.16 [0.87,1.54]
For dry cough at nightl .09 [0.78,1.51 ]
For asthmatic, spastic, or obstructive bronchitis
1.14[0.88,1.48]
For respiratory infectionsl .03 [0.86,1.24]
For sneezing, runny or stuffed nose 1.30 [1.03,1.65]
At age 2 yrs
For wheezing 1.09 [0.90,1.33]
For cough without infection NR insufficient data
For dry cough at nightl. 18 [0.93,1.50]
For asthmatic, spastic, or obstructive bronchitis
0.85 [0.30, 2.34]
For respiratory infectionsl .05 [0.79,1.39]
For sneezing, runny or stuffed nose
1.27(1.04,1.56]
July 2009
E-548
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Oftedal et al.
(2008, 093202)
Period of Study: 2001-
2002
Location: Oslo, Norway
Outcome: Lung function (PEF,
FEF25%, FEF50%, FEVi, FVC)
Age Groups: 9-10 yrs
Study Design: Cross-sectional
l\l: 1847 children
Statistical Analyses: Linear
regression
Covariates: Height, age, BMI, birth
weight, temperature, maternal
smoking, se
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: SPSS, STATA,
S-Plus
Lags Considered: 1-3
Pollutant: PM2.6
IQR:
PM2.6 in 1st yr of life: 6.2
PM2.6 lifetime: 3.6
PM Increment: Per IQR
fB (Lower CI, Upper CI)
PM2.6 in 1st yr of life
PEF-76.1 (-122.2 to-30.0)
FEF25%-75.6 (-127.4 to-23.8)
FEF 50% -62.4 (-107.4 to-17.4)
FEVi-12.7 (-28.8, 3.4)
FVC-2.9 (-20.5,14.7)
PM2.E lifetime exposure
PEF-57.7 (-94.4 to-21.1)
FEF25% -51.8 (-93.1 to-10.6)
FEF 50%-48.4 (-84.2 to-12.6)
FEVi-10.4 (-23.2, 2.4)
FVC -3.9 (-17.9,10.1)
Reference: (Parker et al.,
Outcome: Respiratory
Pollutant: PM2.6
Increment: 10//gfm3
2009,192359)
allergy/hayfever
Averaging Time: NR
Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Period of Study: 1999-
Study Design: Cohort
2005
Median: 13.1
Single Pollutant Model, variable N
Covariates: survey year, age, family
IQR: 10.9-15.2
Adjusted: 1.16(1.04-1.30)
Location: US
structure, usual source of care,
health insurance, family income
relative to federal poverty level,
Copollutant (correlation):
Single Pollutant Model, constant N
race/ethnicity
Summer O3: 0.10
Adjusted: 1.23 (1.04-1.46)
Statistical Analysis: logistic
SO2: 0.21
Multi-pollutant Model: 1.29 (1.07-1.56)
regression
NO2: 0.53
Statistical Package: SUDAAN
PMio-2.b: 0.02
Age Groups: 73,198 children aged
3-17 years
PM10: 0.51
July 2009
E-549
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Sekine et al.
(2004, 090762)
Period of Study: 1987-
1994
Location: Nine districts in
the Tokyo, Japan
metropolitan area: Chuo
ward, Ohta ward, Shibuya
ward, Itabashi ward,
Hachioji City, Tachikawa
City, Ome City, Machida
City, Tanashi City
Outcome: pulmonary function tests
Age Groups: 30-59 yrs
Study Design: Cross-sectional and
longitudinal
N: 500 females
Statistical Analyses: Multiple
logistic regression analysis
Pollutant: Suspended PM (SPM)
Averaging Time: measured each
month for three consecutive days (72
Mean (SD): 28.1-63.3
Range (Min, Max):
3.4-140.6
Covariates: group (classification by Copollutant (correlation): NO2
air pollution level), pulmonary
function at initial test, age and height
at the time of the initial test, number
of years investigated, years of
residence in the area, type of heater,
housing structure, and job status.
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS
Results of multiple logistic regression analysis for respiratory
symptoms
Persistent cough
Group 3: OR - 1.00
Group 2: OR - 1.02 (0.70-1.48)
Group 1: OR - 1.07 (0.67-1.70)
Persistent phlegm
Group 3: OR - 1.00
Group 2: OR - 1.51 (1.11-2.04)
Group 1: OR - 1.78 (1.26-2.53)
Asthma
Group 3: OR - 1.00
Group 2: OR - 1.99 (0.82-4.83)
Group 1: OR - 2.66 (0.98-7.19)
Wheeze
Group 3: OR - 1.00
Group 2: OR - 1.39 (0.95-2.01)
Group 1: OR - 1.34(0.85-2.11)
Breathlessness
Group 3: OR - 1.00
Group 2: OR - 0.84(0.47-1.50)
Group 1: OR - 2.70(1.48-4.91)
Reference: Sharma et al.
(2004,156974)
Period of Study:
1112002-412003
Location: 3 sections in
Kanpur City, India
1) Indian Institute of
Technology Kanpur (IITK)
2) Vikas Nagar (VN)
3) Juhilal Colony (JC)
Outcome: Lung function
Age Groups: 20-55 years
Study Design: Cohort
N: 91 people
Statistical Analyses: Linear
regression
Covariates: NR
Season: Fall, Winter, spring
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package:
Microsoft Excel
Lags Considered: 1 d lag & 5d mov
avg
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-h
Mean (SD): IITK 158 (22)
VN 85 (30)
JC 59 (9)
PM Component: Lead, Nickel,
Cadmium, Chromium, Iron, Zinc
Benzene soluble fraction (includes
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
[PAHs])
Copollutant (correlation):
~PEF - mean daily deviations in PEF
PM2.b-dPEF: -0.30
PM2.B-PM10: 0.67
PM2.b-PMio (1-day lag): 0.49
PM2.5-PM2.il (1-day lag): 0.88
PM Increment: 1 /yglm3
~PEF (difference or change in peak expiratory flow)
¦0.0297 Umin
July 2009
E-550
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: (Singh et al„
2003, 052686)
Period of Study: NR
Location: Jaipur, India
Outcome: Lung function (peak
expiratory flow variability)
Age Groups: Medical school-aged
students
Study Design: Cross sectional
N: 313 nonsmoker students
Statistical Analyses: Amplitude %
mean was used as the measure of
PEF variability. Mean value of
amplitude % mean of peak flow
variability were compared for in the
two groups by application of
Student's t-test. The two groups
were: living on campus and
commuters.
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Pollutant: Respirable su
(RSPM)
Averaging Time: 8 h
Mean (SD): Roadside: 1,666
Campus: 177
Monitoring Stations: 2
PM It appears that no associations between particulates and the
outcome of interest were calculated and reported in this study
Reference: (Solomon et
al„ 2003, 087441)
Period of Study: 1966 to
1997
Location: United
Kingdom: Northern
England, North-West
Midlands, and Wales.
Outcome: Cardio respiratory morbidity Pollutant: Black Smoke
Age Groups: 45 yrs and older Averaging Time: Annual
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 1,166 women
Statistical Analyses: Prevalence
ratios were reported for ischemic heart
disease, asthma, productive cough,
wheeze, and use of an inhaler for
asthma or other breathing problems.
Covariates: Smoked, passive smoking
in childhood, tenancy, SES, worked in
industry with respiratory hazards,
childhood admission to hospital for
chest problem, diabetes, BMI were all
controlled for as potential
confounders.
Dose-response Investigated? yes
Statistical Package: STATA
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
The findings provide no indication that prolonged residence in
places that have had relatively high levels of particulate air
pollution causes an important increase in cardio respiratory
morbidity.
Prevalence ratios are based on high vs. low pollution with low as
referent.
Particulate pollution in place of residence:
Rr - 1.0 (0.7-1.4) for ischemic heart disease:
Rr - 0.7 (0.5-1.0) for asthma
Rr - 1.0 (0.7 -1.5) for productive cough
Reference: Suglia et al.
(2008,157027)
Period of Study: March
1986-October 1992
Location: Boston, MA
Outcome: lung function
Age Groups: 18-42
Study Design: Prospective cohort
N: 272 women of childbearing age
Statistical Analyses: Linear
regression
Covariates: Height, age, weight,
race/ethnicity, year, education
Dose-response Investigated? yes-
tertiles of exposure
Statistical Package: SAS v. 9.0
Pollutant: Black Carbon (BC)
Averaging Time: Annual
Mean (SD): 0.62 (0.15)
PM Increment: 0.22/yg/m3 (IQR)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
FEVi:-1.08 (-2.5, 0.3)
FVC:-0.62 (-1.9, 0.6)
FEF2b-7b%: -2.97 (-5.8 to -0.2)
Current Smokers:
FEVi: 0.62 (-2.1, 3.4)
FVC: 0.64 (-2.0, 3.3)
FEF2B-7B*: -2.63 (-3.7, 8.9)
Former Smokers:
FEVi:-4.40 (-7.8 to-1.0)
FVC:-3.11 (-6.1 to-0.2)
FEF2B7B%: -8.78 (-14.7 to -2.9)
Nonsmokers:
FEVi:-0.98 (-2.9, 0.9)
FVC:-0.32 (-2.0,1.4)
FEF2b-7b%: -4.39 (-8.1 to -0.6)
Exposure-response relationship presented graphically in Figure 1:
the highest BC exposure group had decreases in FEVi, FVC, and
FEF2B-7B% compared with the lowest tertile group, although these
differences were not statistically significant.
July 2009
E-551
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: (Sunyeret al„
2006,089771)
Period of Study: initial
selection: 1991-1993,
follow-up June 2000-
December 2001
Location: 21 centers in
10 European countries
Outcome: Chronic bronchitis
Age Groups: Mean age (range)
Males- 42.62 (38.12-45.62)
Females- 42.57 (39.92-45.69)
Study Design: Hierarchical models
N:6924
Statistical Analyses: General
additive models (GAM)
Covariates: Smoking, age at end of
education, occupational group,
occupational exposures, respiratory
infections during childhood, rhinitis,
asthma, traffic intensity at household
level.
Statistical Package: STATA-8
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 18 months
Mean (SD): 3.7-44.9
Copollutants: NO2, SO2
PM Increment: NR
Odds ratio [Lower CI, Upper CI]
Chronic phlegm prevalence at follow up
Males: 0.97 [0.70,1.35]
Reference: Zhang et al.
(2002,034814)
Period of Study: 1993-
1996
Location: 4 Chinese cities
(urban and suburban
location in each city):
Guangzhou, Wuhan,
Lanzhou, Chongqing
Outcome: Interview-self reports of
symptoms: Wheeze (ever wheezy when
having a cold)
asthma (diagnosis by doctor)
bronchitis (diagnosis by doctor)
hospitalization due to respiratory
disease (ever)
persistent cough (coughed for at least
1 month per year with or apart from
colds)
persistent phlegm (brought up phlegm
or mucus from the chest for at least 1
month per year with or apart from
colds).
Age Groups: Elementary school
students
age range: 5.4-16.2
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 7,557 returned questionnaires
7,392 included in first stage of
analysis
Statistical Analyses: 2-stage
regression approach:
Calculated odds ratios and 95% CIs of
respiratory outcomes and covariates
Second stage consisted of variance-
weighted linear regressions that
examined associations between
district-specific adjusted prevalence
rates and district-specific ambient
levels of each pollutant.
Covariates: Age, gender, breast-fed,
house type, number of rooms, sleeping
in own or shared room, sleeping in own
or shared bed, home coal use,
ventilation device used, homes
smokiness during cooking, eye
irritation during cooking, parental
smoking, mother's education level,
mother's occupation, father's
occupation, questionnaire respondent,
year of questionnaire administration,
season of questionnaire
administration, parental asthma
prevalence.
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 2 years
Mean (SD): 92 (31)
Percentiles:
25th: NR
50th(Median): NR
75th: NR
IQR: 39
Range (Min, Max):
Gives range (max.-min.):
PM2.B-98
Monitoring Stations: 2 types:
municipal monitoring stations over a
period of 4 years (1993-1996)
schoolyards of participating children
over a period of 2 years (1995-
1996)
PM Increment: Interquartile range corresponded to 1 unit of
change.
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
No association between PM2.6 and any type of respiratory
morbidity.
No between or within city association between PM2.6 and any
type of respiratory morbidity.
When scaled to an increment of 50 /yglm3 increase in PM2.6,
association (ORs) between respiratory outcome and PM2.6 was:
Wheeze: 1.06
Asthma: 1.29
Bronchitis: 1.68
Hospitalization: 1.08
Persistent cough: 1.24
Persistent phlegm: 3.09
'All units expressed in //gfm3 unless otherwise specified.
July 2009
E-552
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table E-25. Long-term exposure - respiratory morbidity outcomes - other PM size fractions.
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: El-Zein et al. (2007, 093043) ED Admissions
Period of Study: 2000-2004
Location: Beirut, Lebanon
Outcome: Acute respiratory symptoms:
asthma, URTI, pneumonia, bronchitis
Age Groups: < 17
Study Design: Ecological (natural
experiment comparing admissions before
and after ban on diesel fuel)
N: 5 hospitals, 7573 admissions Oct-Feb,
4303 admissions Oct-Dec
Statistical Analyses: t-test, Poisson
regression
Covariates: Month of Year, temperature,
humidity, orthogonalized rainfall
Season: Oct-Dec (excluding flu season)
and Oct-Feb
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 1-2 years before the
ban compared to 1-2 years after the ban
Pollutant: PM from diesel
Range (Min, Max): NR
PM Component: NR
Monitoring Stations: 1
Notes: Did not look at specific exposure
data
looked at outcome with respect to a
timeline that plotted admissions before
and after a ban on diesel fuel.
Copollutant: NR
PM Increment: NA
p (p-value):
2 years pre-ban vs. 2 years post-ban
Oct to Feb
All Resp: 0.128 (0.32)
Asthma: -0.176 (0.16)
Bronchitis: 0.505 (0.02)
Pneumonia: 0.287 (0.17)
URTI:-0.265 (0.41)
Oct to Dec
All Resp:-0.022 (0.87)
Asthma: -0.21 (0.07)
Bronchitis: 0.2 (0.35)
Pneumonia: -0.065 (0.78)
URTI:-0.628 (0.05)
2 years pre-ban vs. 1 year post-ban
Oct-Feb
All Resp:-0.093 (0.45)
Asthma: -0.208 (0.05)
Bronchitis: 0.286 (0.32)
Pneumonia: -0.07 (0.76)
URTI:-0.715 (0.11)
Oct to Dec
All Resp:-0.147 (0.02)
Asthma: -0.147 (0.00)
Bronchitis: -0.011 (0.96)
Pneumonia: -0.214 (0.15)
URTI:-0.885 (0.06)
1 years pre-ban vs. 1 year post-ban
Oct-Feb
All Resp:-0.165 (0.04)
Asthma: -0.212 (0.09)
Bronchitis: 0.059 (0.85)
Pneumonia: -0.034 (0.84)
URTI:-1.023 (0.00)
Oct to Dec
All Resp:-0.17 (0.00)
Asthma: -0.131 (0.00)
Bronchitis: -0.145 (0.001)
Pneumonia: -0.168 (0.12)
URTI:-1.036 (0.00)
July 2009
E-553
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Kasamatsu et al. (2006,
156627)
Period of Study: 2001-2002
Location: Shenyang, China
Outcome: FVC, FEVi, PEF, FEFjb
Age Groups: School Children aged 8-10
Study Design: Children in three schools
in three types of areas (commercial city
area, residential city area, residential
suburban area) invited to participate
N: 322 children participated, 244 have
complete data.
Statistical Analyses: Genralized
estimating equations
Covariates: age, height,
Dose-response Investigated? no
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags: Considered: previous quarter.
Pollutant: PM7
Averaging Time: avg of 4 separate 2-7
consecutive day measurements within
each designated measurement month of
the quarter
Mean (SD): School A
712001 86.4(14.2)
1012001 114.1(35.1)
112002 118.2(28.2)
412002 182.7(102.1)
School B
712001 90.1(8.3)
1012001 161.5(45.7)
112002 118.8(28.2)
412002 152.0(31.3)
School C
712001 78.1(16.9)
1012001 131.2(29.6)
112002 142.2(37.6)
412002 173.6(121.5)
PM Component: mainly pollutants
associated with coal heating
Monitoring Stations: 1 at each location
PM Increment: 63.0/yg/m3
Mean change of pulmonary function
value [Lower CI, Upper CI] at lag 0
Boys
FVC -0.095( 0.170,-0.019)
FEV1 -0.088(0.158,-0.019)
PEF -0.170( 0.365,0.032)
FEFjb-0.063(0.183,0.050)
Girls
FVC -0.082( 0.145,-0.019)
FEV1 -0.069(0.126,-0.006)
PEF 0.095(-0.095,0.290)
FEFjb-0.032(0.151,0.082)
Mean change of pulmonary function value
[Lower CI, Upper CI] at lag 1 (previous
quarter)
Boys
FVC-0.145(-0.189,-0.095)
FEV1 -0.095(0.139,-0.057)
PEF -0.082( 0.208,0.050)
FEFjb 0.013(-0.063,0.088)
Girls
FVC-0.126(-0.170,-0.088)
FEV1 -0.101(0.139,-0.063)
PEF -0.101( 0.227,0.025)
FEFjb-0.057(0.132,0.019)
July 2009
E-554
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Kasamatsu et al.(2006,
156627)
Period of Study: 2001-2002
Location: Shenyang, China
Outcome: FVC, FEVi, PEF, FEFjb
Age Groups: School Children aged 8-10
Study Design: Children in three schools
in three types of areas (commercial city
area, residential city area, residential
suburban area) invited to participate
N: 322 children participated, 244 have
complete data.
Statistical Analyses: Genralized
estimating equations
Covariates: age, height,
Dose-response Investigated? no
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags: Considered: previous quarter.
Pollutant: PM2.1
Averaging Time: avg of 4 separate 2-7
consecutive day measurements within
each designated measurement month of
the quarter
Mean (SD):
School A
712001 47.6(6.4)
1012001 54.2(20.5)
112002 68.9(15.8)
412002 115.8(76.7)
School B
712001 45.6(6.5)
1012001 74.4(27.1)
112002 63.3(17.9)
412002 96.3(27.6)
School C
712001 42.5(9.5)
1012001 59.7(13.1)
112002 76.4(22.1)
412002 123.0(100.9)
PM Component: mainly pollutants
associated with coal heating
Monitoring Stations: 1 at each location
PM Increment: 42.1 /yglm3
Mean change of pulmonary function value
[Lower CI, Upper CI] at lag 0
Boys
FVC -0.126( 0.181,-0.076)
FEV1 -0.122(0.173,-0.076)
PEF -0.164( 0.303, 0.025)
FEFjb-0.046(0.131,0.038)
Girls
FVC-0.110(-0.156,-0.067)
FEV1 -0.101(0147,-0.059)
PEF 0.008(-0.131,0.147)
FEFjb-0.055(0.139,0.030)
Mean change of pulmonary function value
[Lower CI, Upper CI] at lag 1 (previous
quarter)
Boys
FVC -0.099( 0.145,-0.053)
FEV1 -0.059(0.106,-0.020)
PEF -0.040( 0.158,0.086)
FEFjb 0.026(-0.046,0.092)
Girls
FVC -0.086( 0.125,-0.046)
FEV1 -0.066(0.106,-0.026)
PEF -0.079( 0.198,0.040)
FEFjb-0.033(0.106,0.040)
'All units expressed in //gfm3 unless otherwise specified.
E.6. Long-Term Exposure and Cancer
Table E-26. Long-term exposure - cancer outcomes - PM10.
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: (Abbey et al., 1999, 047559) Outcome (ICD9): Lung Cancer Mortality
(162)
Period of Study: 1977-1992
Location: California
Age Groups: 27-95 at baseline
Study Design: Cohort (AHSMOG)
N: 6,338 nonsmoking CA Seventh-Day
Adventists
Statistical Analyses: time-dependent,
gender-specific, Cox proportional hazards
regression models
Covariates: age, smoking, education,
occupation, BMI
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: monthly estimates
from 1966-1992
Mean (SD): 51.24 (16.63)
Percentiles: IQR: 24.08
Range (Min, Max): 0, 83.9
Correlations:
S04: r - 0.68)
SO2: r - 0.31
O3: r - 0.77
NO?: r - 0.56
Lag: 3 years
PM Increment: 24.08 (IQR)
RR, males: 3.36(1.57,7.19]
RR, females: 1.33 [0.60, 2.96]
PM10 above 10O/jg/m3 (days per year)
IQR: 43 days/year
Males: 2.38 (1.42, 3.97)
Females: 1.08 (0.55, 2.13)
July 2009
E-555
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Beeson et al. (1998,
048890)
Period of Study: 1977-1992
Location: California
Reference: Binkova et al. (2007,
156273)
Period of
Location:
Reference: (Liu et al., 2009,190292)
Period of Study: 1995-2005
Location: Taiwan
Outcome (ICD9: Lung Cancer Mortality
(ICD0-1: 162, ICDO-2: C34.0-C34.9)
Age Groups: 27-95 at baseline
Study Design: Cohort (AHSM0G)
N: 6,338 nonsmoking CA Seventh-Day
Adventists (non-Hispanic white)
Statistical Analyses: time-dependent,
gender-specific, Cox proportional hazards
regression models
Covariates: Smoking, Education, Age,
Alcohol
Statistical Package: SAS
Lags Considered: 3 yr
Outcome: Total DNA adducts (bulky
aromatic PAH-DNA adducts and ...
N: 53 occupational^ exposed policemen
and 52 control policemen
Statistical Analyses: Multivariate
logistic regression, Mann-Whitney u-test
Covariates: Smoking. Vitamin C,
polymorphisms of XPD repair gene in
exon 23 and 6 and GSTM 1 and XRCC1
genes
Season: Winter
Outcome: Bladder Cancer Mortality (ICD-
9188)
Age Groups: 50-69
Study Design: case-crossover
Statistical Analysis: Multiple Logistic
Regression
Statistical Package: NR
Covariates: none
Dose-response Investigated? No
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: averaged monthly
estimates from 1966-1992
Mean (SD): 51 (16.52)
Percentiles: IQR: 24
Range (Min, Max): 0, 84
Pollutant: PMio
Range (Min, Max): 32-55
Monitoring Stations: 2 (and personal
monitors)
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: annual mean of 24h
avg
Tertiles (median):
T1:n52.80
T2: 53.04-71.72
T3: 72.24-90.29
Copollutant: 0:i, CO, NO2, SO2
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Monitoring Sattions: 64
PM Increment: 24 (IQR)
RR, males: 5.21 [1.94,13.99]
RR, females: Positive, but not
statistically significant
No relationship between short term
exposure to C-PAHs evaluated by
personal monitors and DNA adduct level.
Genetic damage was observed in city
policemen working in winter outdoors in
the Prague downtown area
they had slightly elevated aromatic DNA
adduct levels, which was statistically
significant for a distinct DNA adduct spot
that could originate from ambient
exposure to B[n]P.
Total PAH-DNA adducts: p - 0.065
Exposed: 0.92 ± 0.28 adducts/108
nucleotids
Control: 0.82 ± 0.23 adducts/108
nucleotids
B[D]P-like adducts:
Exposed: 0.122 ± 0.36 adducts/108
nucleotids
Control: 0.099 ± 0.035 adducts/108
nucleotids
Multiple regression "like" B[n]P-DI\IA
adduct for air pollution exposure group: B
- 0.016, p - 0.01
Increment:
Odds Ratio (Min CI, Max CI)
Lag
T1 vs. T1:1.00 (ref)
T2 vs. T1: 1.08 (0.83-1.41)
T3 vs. T1: 1.39 (1.06-1.83)
P for trend - .020
Study: February 6-20, 2001 Age Groups: 22-50 yrs
Prague, Czech Republic Study Design: Case Control
July 2009
E-556
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: (Pope CA et al., 2002,
024689)
Period of Study: 1982-1998
Location: 50 US states, District of
Columbia, and Puerto Rico
Outcome (ICD9): Lung cancer mortality
(162)
Age Groups: Ages > 30 years Study
Design: Longitudinal cohort (Cancer
Prevention Study II)
N: 1.2 million people
Statistical Analyses: Cox proportional
hazard, generalized additive
Covariates: Age, sex, race, education,
smoking status, marital status,
occupational exposure, diet, body-mass
index, alcohol consumption
Pollutant: PMio
Mean (SD): 1982-1998: 28.8(5.9)
Effect estimates: Effect estimates were
recorded in Figure 5 and not presented
quantitatively anywhere else
Reference: Sram et al, (2007,188457) Outcome: Chromosomal aberrations
Period of Study: January and March of
2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Study Design: Panel
Covariates: urinary cotinine, plasma
levels of vitamins A, E and C, folate, total
cholesterol, HDL and LDL cholesterols,
and triglycerides
Statistical Analysis: bivariate
correlations, ANOVA, Mann-Whitney,
Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman rank
correlation
Statistical Package: STATISTICA
Age Groups: 61 city policemen, aged 34
± 8 years, spending 8+ hours outdoors
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: NR
Mean (SD) Unit:
January: 55.6/yg/m3
March: 36.4/yg/m3
Copollutant: PM2.6
Results not given by PM increment.
Reference: Sram et al, (2007,188457) Outcome: Chromosomal aberrations
Period of Study: January and March of
2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Study Design: Panel
Covariates: urinary cotinine, plasma
levels of vitamins A, E and C, folate, total
cholesterol, HDL and LDL cholesterols,
and triglycerides
Statistical Analysis: bivariate
correlations, ANOVA, Mann-Whitney,
Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman rank
correlation
Statistical Package: STATISTICA
Age Groups: 61 city policemen, aged 34
± 8 years, spending 8+ hours outdoors
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: NR
Mean (SD) Unit:
January: 44.4/yg/m3
March: 24.8 /yglm3
Copollutant: PMio
Results not given by PM increment.
Reference: (Tarantini et al., 2009,
192010
Period of Study: NR
Location: Brescia, Italy
Outcome: DNA methylation content
estimated by Alu, LINE-1 and/TITOS
analysis
Study Design: Panel
Covariates: age, BMI, smoking, number
of cigarettes/day
Statistical Analysis: mixed effects
models
Statistical Package: NR
Age Groups: 63 male workers between
27 and 55 years, mean age 44.
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: NR
Mean (SD) Unit: NR
Individual Exposure Range: 73.4-1220
/yg/m3
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Difference in DNA Methylation before
and after work exposure, mean (SE)
Alu (%5mC): 0.00 (0.08), p - 0.99
LINE-1 (%5mC): 0.02 (0.11), p - 0.89
ilMOS (%5mC): -0.61 (0.26), p - 0.02
July 2009
E-557
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: (Vineis et al„ 2006,192089) Outcome: lung cancer
Period of Study: 1990-1999
Location: 10 European countries
Study Design: nested case-control
Covariates: age, sex, country, smoking
status, time since recruitment, education,
BMI, physical activity, intake of fruit,
vegetables, meat, alcohol and energy
Statistical Analysis: conditional logistic
regression models
Statistical Package: NR
Age Groups: 35-74 at recruitment
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: NR
Mean by Country (/vg/m3):
France
lie-de-France
1990-1994: 22.3
1995-1999: 19.9
Northeast France
1990-1994: 30.2
1995-1999: 29.5
Italy
Turin
1990-1994: 73.4
1995-1999: 61.1
Florence
1990-1994: 40.4
1995-1999: 33.3
United Kingdom
Oxford
1990-1994: 29.0
1995-1999: 25.5
Cambridge
1990-1994: NR
1995-1999: 25.4
The Netherlands
Utrecht
1990-1994: 42.8
1995-1999: 40.0
Bilthoven
1990-1994: 39.0
1995-1999: 37.2
Germany
1990-1994: NR
1995-1999: 27.0
Potsdam
1990-1994: 32.0
1995-1999: 28.9
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant: NO2, O3, SO2
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Odds Ratios (Min CI, Max CI) for
increase in lung cancer per increment
increase in PM10
0.91 (0.70-1.18)
July 2009
E-558
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: (Wei et al„ 2009,192361)
Period of Study: 11/17/2006 -
111312007
Location: Peking, China
Outcome: Urinary 8-OHdG increase
Study Design: Panel
Covariates: NR
Statistical Analysis: analysis of
variance model with autoregressive terms
Statistical Package: SAS
Age Groups: Two nonsmoking security
guards, ages 18 and 20
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24h
Median: 154.87 /yglm3
IQR: 166.29
Copollutant (correlation): NA
Increment: 166.29/yg/m3
8-OHdG Concentrations, pre and post-
work shift, subjects averaged
Pre-work: 1.83
Post-work: 6.92
Concentration Changes (95%CI) of 8-
OHdG per IQR Increase
Pre-work: 0.256 (0.040, 0.472), p -
0.021
Post-work: 2.370 (0.907, 3.833), p -
0.002
'All units expressed in /yglm3 unless otherwise specified.
Table E-27. Long-term exposure - cancer outcomes - PM2.5 (including PM components/sources).
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Baccarelli et al, (2009,
188183)
Period of Study: 111999-612007
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Outcome: DNA methylation of LINE-1
and Alu
Study Design: Panel
Covariates: age, BMI, smoking status,
pack-years, statin use, fasting blood
glucose, diabetes mellitus, percent
lymphocytes and neutrophils in
differential blood count, day of the week,
season, temperature
Statistical Analysis: mixed effects
models
Statistical Package: SAS
Age Groups: 719 elderly individuals,
mean age 73.3, range 55-100 years
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: NR
Mean (SD) Unit:
4h: 12.2 (7.7)/yg/m3
1d: 10.9 (6.3) /ygfm3
2d: 10.6 (5.2)/ygfm3
3d: 10.4 (4.8)/yg/m3
4d: 10.3 (4.3) /ygfm3
5d: 10.2 (3.9) /ygfm3
6d: 10.3 (3.5) /ygfm3
7d: 10.3 (3.3) /ygfm3
Copollutants: Black carbon, Sulfate
Increment: SD for each lag
Correlation Coefficient (95% CI)
Lag for LINE-1 Methylation
4h: -0.07 (-0.13,-0.01), p - 0.03
1d: -0.09 (-0.16, -0.02), p - 0.008
2d: -0.10 (-0.17,-0.03), p - 0.003
3d: -0.10 (-0.17,-0.04), p - 0.003
4d: -0.10 (-0.16, -0.03), p - 0.004
5d: -0.10 (-0.16, -0.03), p - 0.004
6d: -0.11 (-0.17,-0.04), p - 0.001
7d: -0.13 (-0.19, -0.06), p < 0.001
Correlation Coefficient (95% CI)
Lag for Alu Methylation
4h: 0.03 (-0.03, 0.09), p - 0.28
1d: -0.01 (-0.07,0.05), p - 0.74
2d: -0.01 (-0.07,0.05), p - 0.82
3d:-0.01 (-0.07,0.05), p - 0.78
4d: -0.01 (-0.07,0.05), p - 0.75
5d: -0.01 (-0.07,0.05), p - 0.84
6d: -0.01 (-0.07,0.05), p - 0.74
7d: -0.01 (-0.07,0.05), p - 0.71
Correlation Coefficient (95% CI)
LINE-1 Methylation and moving
averages of pollutant levels
4h: -0.04 (-0.11, 0.03), p - 0.24
7d: -0.11 (-0.18, -0.05), p - 0.001
July 2009
E-559
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Binkova et al. (2007,
156273)
Period of Study: February 6-20, 2001
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Outcome: Bulky aromatic PAH-DNA
adducts
Age Groups: 22-50 yrs
Study Design: Case Control
N: 53 exposed policemen and 52 control
policemen
Statistical Analyses: Multivariate
logistic regression, Mann-Whitney, Rank-
Sum Litest
Covariates: Smoking. Vitamin C,
polymorphisms of XPD repair gene in
exon 23 and 6 and GSTM 1 gene
Season: Winter
Pollutant: PM2.6
Range (Min, Max): 27-38
c-PAHs: range - 18-22 ng/m3
B[a]P: range - 2.5-3.1 ng/m3
Monitoring Stations: 2
Genetic damage was observed in city
policemen working in winter outdoors in
the Prague downtown area
they had slightly elevated aromatic DNA
adduct levels, which was more
pronounced for a distinct DNA adduct
spot that could originate from ambient
exposure to B[n]P.
Total DNA-adduct level
Exposed: 0.92±0.28 adducts/108
nucleotides
Control: 0.82±0.23 adducts/108
nucleotides
p - 0.065
"Like" B[D]P-derived DNA adducts
Exposed: 0.122 ±0.036
Control: 0.101 ±0.035
p < 0.01
Multiple Regression (exposed vs.
control)
B - 0.016, p - 0.011
Reference: Brunekreef et al, (2009,
191947)
Period of Study: 1987-1996
Location: The Netherlands
Outcome: Air pollution related lung
cancer deaths (ICD-9 162)
Study Design: Case-cohort
Covariates
Individual: sex, age, Quetelet index,
smoking status, passive smoking status,
educational level, occupation,
occupational exposure, marital status,
alcohol use, intake of vegetables, fruits,
energy, saturatured and monounsaturated
fatty acids, trans fatty acids, total fiver,
folic acid and fish
Area-level: Percent of population with
income below the 40th percentile and
above the 80th percentile
Statistical Analysis: Cox proportional
hazards
Statistical Package: Stata, SPSS, R
Age Groups: 120,000 adults aged 55-69
years at enrollment
Pollutant: PM2.6, estimated from PM10
levelsf
Averaging Time: 24hr
50"1 Percentile: 28 /yg/m3
Range (Min, Max): 23-37
Copollutant (correlation):
NO2: 0.75
Black Smoke: 0.84
NO: 0.69
SO2: 0.43
Increment: 10/yg/m3
Relative Risk (95% CI) for
associations between PM2.sand lung
cancer incidence
Case Cohort
Unadjusted: 0.93 (0.71-1.22)
Adjusted: 0.67(0.41-1.10)
Unadjusted Complete: 0.87 (0.60-1.25)
Full Cohort
Unadjusted: 0.96 (0.79-1.18)
Adjusted: 0.81 (0.63-1.04)
Unadjusted Complete: 0.92 (0.74-1.15)
Reference: Liu et al. (2008,156708)
Period of Study: 1995-2005
Location: Taiwan
Outcome: Brain cancer deaths
ICD9: 191
Age Groups: 29 yrs of age or younger
Study Design: matched case-control by
sex, years of birth and death
N: 340 matched pairs
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Covariates: age, gender, urbanization
level of residence, nonpetrochemical air
pollution exposure level
No direct measures of pollutants
used an index to assign petrochemical air
pollution exposure (each municipality was
assigned an exposure by dividing the
number of workers per municipality
employed in the petrochemical industry
by the municipalities total population).
Study participants divided into tertiles
based on this index.
People who lived in the group of
municipalities with the highest levels of
air pollutants arising from petrochemical
sources were at a statistically significant
increased risk for brain cancer
development compared to the group living
in municipalities with the lowest
petrochemical air pollution exposure
index.
Effect Measure: OR (95%CI)
Tertile 1: 1. ?0
Tertile 2: 1.54 (0.98-2.42)
Tertile 3: 1.65 (1.00-2.73)
P for trend < 0.01
July 2009
E-560
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Nafstad et al. (2004,
087949)
Period of Study: 1972/73-1998
Location: Oslo, Norway
Outcome: Lung cancer
ICD7 162.1-162.9
Age Groups: 40-49 yr old men
Study Design: Cohort
PM values had small variations in No effect estimates for PM
exposure level, and strong correlations
with another pollutant of interest (SO2)
and were not considered in analyses.
Copollutants: SO2
N: 16,209 males
NOx
Statistical Analyses: Cox regression
models (proportional hazards)
Covariates: age at inclusion, smoking
habits, education
Season: all year
Reference: (Pope CA and Burnett, 2007,
090928)
Period of Study: 1982-1998
Location: 50 US states, District of
Columbia, and Puerto Rico
Outcome: Lung cancer mortality (162)
Age Groups: >30 years
Study Design: Longitudinal cohort
(Cancer Prevention II Study)
N: 415,000 CPS II patients with
information involving PMio
Statistical Analyses: Cox proportional
hazard, incorporating a spatial random-
effects component
Covariates: Age, sex, race, education,
ETS, smoking status, marital status,
occupational exposure, diet, body-mass
index, alcohol consumption
Pollutant: PM2.6
Mean (SD): 1979-1983: 21.1(4.6)
1999-2000: 14.0(3.0)
Average: 17.7(3.7)
Averaging time: 1982-1998
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Lung Cancer: 1979-1983: 1,08[1.01,
1.16]
1999-2000: 1.13(1.04,1.22]
Avg: 1.14[1.04,1.23]
RR results were also presented in Figures
2-5. Authors found that PM2.6 had the
strongest association with increased risk
of all-cause, cardiopulmonary, and lung
cancer mortality.
Reference: Sram et al, (2007,188457)
Period of Study: 2/6/2001-2/20/2001
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Outcome: Chromosomal aberrations
Study Design: Panel
Covariates: urinary cotinine, plasma
levels of vitamins A, E and C
Statistical Analysis: bivariate
correlations, AN0VA, Mann-Whitney,
Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman rank
correlation
Statistical Package: STATISTICA, SAS
Age Groups: 53 city policemen, aged 22-
50 years, spending 8+ hours outdoors
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: NR
Range: 32-55/yg/m3
Copollutant: PM2.6
Results not given by PM increment.
Reference: Sram et al, (2007,188457)
Period of Study: 2/6/2001-2/20/2001
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Outcome: Chromosomal aberrations
Study Design: Panel
Covariates: urinary cotinine, plasma
levels of vitamins A, E and C
Statistical Analysis: bivariate
correlations, AN0VA, Mann-Whitney,
Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman rank
correlation
Statistical Package: STATISTICA, SAS
Age Groups: 53 city policemen, aged 22-
50 years, spending 8+ hours outdoors
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: NR
Range: 27-38/yg/m3
Copollutant: PM10
Results not given by PM increment.
July 2009
E-561
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Tovalin et al. (Tovalin et al.,
2006, 091322)
Period of Study: April-May 2002
Location: Mexico City and Puebla
Outcome: DNA damage (comet tail
length)
Age Groups: 18-60
Study Design: Panel Study
N: 55 male workers
Statistical Analyses: Mann-Whitney
test, Chi-square, Spearman's correlation,
logistic regression
Statistical Package: SPSS and STATA
Pollutant: PM2.6
Personal monitoring values observed in
this study reported in Tovalin et al. 2003
Median Personal Exposure to PM2.5:
Mexico City
Outdoor Worker: 133/yg/m3
Indoor Worker: 86.6 //g|m3
Puebla
Outdoor Worker: 122/yg/m3
Indoor Worker: 78.3 //g|m3
OR for being a highly damaged worker:
1.02 (1.01-1.04), p - 0.03
Correlation between comet tail length and
PM 2.5: 0.57, p - 0.000
OR for being a highly damaged worker:
1.03, pn 0.07
Comet Tail Length
Outdoor Worker: 46.80 /jm
Indoor Worker: 30.11 fjm
p < 0.01
Percent Highly DNA Damaged Cells
Outdoor Worker: 68%
Indoor Worker: 20%
All units expressed in uglm unless otherwise specified.
Table E-28. Long-term exposure - cancer outcomes - other PM size fractions.
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: (Pope CA et al., 2002,
024689)
Period of Study: 1982-1998
Location: 50 US states, District of
Columbia, and Puerto Rico
Outcome: Lung cancer mortality (162) Pollutant: PMie
Age Groups: Ages >30 years who were Mean (SD): 1979-1983: 40.3(7.7)
members of a household with at least one
individual £45yrs.
Relative risks effect estimates were
recorded in Figure 5 and not presented
quantitatively anywhere else.
Study Design: Longitudinal cohort
(Cancer Prevention Study II)
N: 359,000 CPS II participants with
information regarding PMie and PMie -
PM2.6
Statistical Analyses: Cox proportional
hazard, incorporating a spatial random-
effects component
Covariates: Age, sex, race, education,
ETS, smoking status, marital status,
occupational exposure, diet, body-mass
index, alcohol consumption
Smoking covariates adjusted for:
Indicator: current smoker, former smoker,
pipe or cigar smoker, started smoking
before or after age 18
Continuous, current and former smokers:
years smoked, years smoked squared,
cigarettes per day, cigarettes per day
squared, number of hours per day
exposed to passive cigarette smoke.
Pollutant: PMib 2b
Mean (SD): 1979-1983: 19.2(6.1)
Averaging Time: 1979-1983
'All units expressed in //gfm3 unless otherwise specified.
July 2009
E-562
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
E.7. Long-Term Exposure and Reproductive Effects
Table E-29. Long-term exposure - reproductive outcomes - PM10.
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Bell at al. (2007, 091059)
Period of Study: 1999-2002
Location: Connecticut-Fairfield,
Hartford, New Haven, New London,
Windham, Massachusetts-Barnstable,
Berkshire, Bristol, Essex, Hampden,
Middlesex, Norfolk, Plymouth, Suffolk,
Worcester
Outcome: Low birth weight
Age Groups: Neonates
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 358,504 births
Statistical Analyses: Multiple logistic
and linear regressions
Covariates: Child's sex, mother's
education, tobacco use, mother's marital
status, mother's race, time prenatal care
began, mother's age, birth order,
gestation length
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 22.3 (5.3)
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant: NO2, CO, SO2
Gestation exposure correlation:
PM2.6: r - 0.77
NO?: r - 0.55
PM Increment: 7.4/yg/m3 (IQR)
Difference in birth weight [Lower CI,
Upper CI]
per IQR for the gestational period: -
8.21-11.1 to-5.3]
Difference in birth weight by race of
mother [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Black: -7.9 [-16.0, 0.2]
White:-9.0 [-12.2 to-5.9]
Range among trimester models for
change in birth weight per IQR
increase (min, max)
trimester: -6.6 to -4.7
3rd
OR Estimate for birth weight < 2500
g [Lower CI, Upper CI]
per IQR for the gestational period:
1.027 [0.991,1.064]
Notes: Analyses using first births alone
yielded similar results. Two pollutant
models for uncorrelated pollutants were
analyzed but not presented quantitatively.
Reference: Brauer et al. (2008,156292) Outcome: Preterm birth, SGA, LBW
Period of Study: 1999-2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Age Groups: Study Design: Cross-
sectional
N: 70,249 births
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression
Covariates: Sex, parity, month and year
of birth, maternal age and smoking,
neighborhood level income and education
Statistical Package: SAS
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24-h
Mean (SD): 12.7
Range (Min, Max): 5.6, 35.4
Monitoring Stations: 19
Copollutant: NO
NO2
CO
SO2
0s
PM Increment: 1 /yglm3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
pollutant assessed for entire
pregnancy period:
SGA: 1.02 (0.99,1.05)
LBW: 1.01 (0.95,1.08)
Preterm (< 30 weeks): 1.13 (0.95,1.35)
July 2009
E-563
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Chen et al. (2002, 024945)
Period of Study: 1991-1999
Location: Washoe County, Nevada
Outcome: birth weight
Age Groups: single births with
gestational age between 37-44 weeks
and maternal all ages
Study Design: cross-sectional
N: 33,859 single births
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 31.53 (22.32)
Percentiles: 25th: 16.80
50th(Median): 26.30
Statistical Analyses: multiple linear and 75th: 39.35
logistic regression
Covariates: infant sex, maternal
residential city, education, medical risk
factors, active tobacco use, drug use,
alcohol use, prenatal care, mother's age,
race and ethnicity of mothers and weight
gain of mothers
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SPSS 10.0
Range (Min, Max): (0.97-157.32)
Monitoring Stations: 4
Copollutant: CO
0s
July 2009
E-564
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Using continuous pollutant variables
Model one-PMio
1 trimester
Crude model: B - -0.186 (0.225)
Adjusted model: B - -0.082 (0.221)
2 trimester
Crude model: B - 0.045 (0.223)
Adjusted model: B - -0.020 (0.221)
3 trimester
Crude model: B - -0.509 (0.231)
Adjusted model: B - -0.395 (0.227)
Whole
Crude model: B - -0.823 (0.459)
Adjusted model: B - -0.726 (0.483)
Model two
CO and PMio
3 trimester
Crude model: B - -1.044 (0.457)
Adjusted model: B - -1.078 (0.445)
O3 and PMio
3 trimester
Crude model: B - -1.035 (0.385)
Adjusted model: B - -0.966 (0.378)
Model three
PMio, O3, and CO
3 trimester
Crude model: B - -1.070 (0.458)
Adjusted model: B - -1.102 (0.446)
Whole
Crude model: B - -1.413 (0.733)
Adjusted model: B - -1.332 (0.738)
Using categorical pollutant variables-3
trimester
Model 1-PMio
Adjusted model: B - -10.243 (5.235)
Model 2
PMio and CO
Adjusted model: B - -11.883 (6.108)
PMio and O3 Adjusted model: B - -9.144
(5.860)
Model 3
PMio, CO, and O3 Adjusted model: B - ¦
10.937 (6.222)
Using logistic regression (ref value -
< 19.72 //g/m3
Exposure to PMio at 3 trimester at
>44.74/yglm3: OR - 1.105 (0.714-
1.709)
BeJMk^TO™ QUOTE
- 1.050 (0.811-1.360)
Notes: Crude model: model with air-
pollutant variables controlled with
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Dales et al. (2004, 087342)
Period of Study: Jan 1,1984-Dec 31,
1999
Location: Canada (12 cities)
Outcome: SIDS (a sudden, unexplained Pollutant: PM
death of a child < 1 year of age for
which a clinical investigation and autopsy
fail to reveal a cause of death)
Averaging Time: 24-hs (PM measures
every 6 days
Age Groups: Infants < 1 yr
Study Design: Time-series
N: Total population of 12 cities:
10,310,309
1556 cases of SIDS over study period
Statistical Analyses: Random-effects
regression model for count data (a linear
association between air pollution and the
incidence of SIDS was assumed on the
logarithmic scale)
Covariates: weather factors (daily mean
temp, daily mean relative humidity,
maximum change in barometric pressure,
all measured on the day of death), length
of time-period adjustment, seasonal
indicator variables, and size-fractionated
PM
Season: Used piece-wise constant
functions in time that varied by 3, 6, or
12 months
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
gaseous pollutants every day)
Mean (IQR): PMio: 23.43 (15.56)
Range (Min, Max): IQR presented above
Monitoring Stations: When data were
available from more than one monitoring
site, they were averaged
Copollutant: PM2.6
PM10
CO
NO?
0s
SO?
Notes: The abstract reports no
association between increased daily rates
of SIDS and fine particles measured every
sixth day. However, no effect estimates
presented for PM (only gaseous
pollutants adjusted for PM).
Reference: Dugandzic et al. (2006,
088681)
Period of Study: 1/1/1988-12/31/2000
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Outcome: Low birth weight (LBW)
(< 2500 grams)
Age Groups: Babies born a 37 weeks
(full term)
Study Design: cross-sectional
N: 74,284 births
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression
Covariates: Maternal age, parity, prior
fetal death, prior neonatal death, prior
low birth weight infant, smoking during
pregnancy, neighborhood family income,
infant gender, gestational age, weight
change, year of birth
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: SAS
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24-h
Mean (SD):
Percentiles: 25th: 14
50th(Median): 16
75th: 19
Range (Min, Max): Max: 53
Monitoring Stations: 18
Copollutant: SO2, O3
Notes: Only three stations monitored
more than one pollutant. Daily data were
available for gaseous pollutants while
particulate levels were measured every
sixth day.
PM Increment: 1) IQR (5/yglm3)
2) Quartiles (first quartile is the
reference)
Exposure period: first trimester
Unadjusted model
2nd quartile: 1.24 (0.95,1.62)
3rd quartile: 1.25 (0.96,1.62)
4th quartile: 1.28 (1.00,1.65)
Per IQR: 1.09 (1.00,1.18)
Adjusted model
2nd quartile: 1.24 (0.94,1.64)
3rd quartile: 1.24 (0.95,1.64)
4th quartile: 1.33 (1.02,1.74)
Per IQR: 1.09 (1.00,1.19)
Adjusted for Birth Year model
2nd quartile: 1.14 (0.86,1.52)
3rd quartile: 1.08 (0.82,1.44)
4th quartile: 1.11 (0.84,1.48)
Per IQR: 1.03 (0.94,1.14)
Exposure period: second trimester
Unadjusted model
2nd quartile: 0.98(0.76,1.28)
3rd quartile: 1.09 (0.84,1.40)
4th quartile: 1.00 (0.77,1.28)
Per IQR: 1.00 (0.91,1.09)
Adjusted model
July 2009
E-565
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
2nd quartile: 1.02 (0.77,1.34)
3rd quartile: 1.16 (0.89,1.51)
4th quartile: 1.09 (0.83,1.42)
Per IQR: 1.02 (0.93,1.12)
Adjusted for Birth Year model
2nd quartile: 0.99(0.75,1.31)
3rd quartile: 1.10(0.84,1.45)
4th quartile: 1.01 (0.76,1.34)
Per IQR: 1.00 (0.90,1.10)
Exposure period: third trimester
Unadjusted model
2nd quartile: 0.93(0.72,1.20)
3rd quartile: 1.07 (0.83,1.37)
4th quartile: 0.92 (0.71,1.18)
Per IQR: 0.95 (0.87,1.05)
Adjusted model
2nd quartile: 0.96(0.73,1.26)
3rd quartile: 1.14 (0.88,1.48)
4th quartile: 1.03 (0.79,1.35)
Per IQR: 0.99 (0.89,1.09)
Adjusted for Birth Year model
2nd quartile: 0.92(0.70,1.21)
3rd quartile: 1.04 (0.80,1.36)
4th quartile: 0.92 (0.69,1.22)
Per IQR: 0.94 (0.85,1.05)
Reference: Gilboa, et al. (2005, 087892) Outcome: Birth defects
Age Groups: newborn babies
Period of Study: January 1,1996-
December 31, 2000
Location: Seven Counties in Texas, USA:
(Bexar, Dallas, El Paso, Harris, Hidalgo,
Tarrant, Travis)
Study Design: Case-control
l\l: 5,338 newborn babies
4574 controls
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression
Covariates: alcohol consumption during
pregnancy, attendant of delivery (i.e., the
person who delivered the baby
(physician/nursemaid-wife vs. other)),
gravidity, marital status, maternal age,
maternal education, maternal illness,
maternal race/ethnicity, parity, place of
delivery, plurality, prenatal care, season
of conception, and tobacco use during
pregnancy
control frequency matched to cases by
vital status, year and maternal county of
residence
Season: covariate in model
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: SAS v 8.2
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: NR
Percentiles: 25th: < 19.5
50th(Median): 19.5-<23.8
75th: 23.8- < 29.0
100th: > 29.0
Monitoring Stations: The Environmental
Protection Agency provided raw data
for hourly (for gases) or daily (for PM) air
pollution concentrations for the seven
study counties
Copollutant: CO, NO2, O3, SO2
PM Increment: calculated as quartiles of
avg concentration during weeks 3-8 of
pregnancy
Isolated Cardiac Defects
Aortic artery and valve defects:
25th: 0.40 (0.15,1.03)
50th: 0.45 (0.18,1.13)
75th: 0.68 (0.28,1.65)
Atrial septal defects:
25th: 1.41 (0.86, 2.31)
50th: 2.13 (1.34, 3.37)
75th: 2.27 (1.43, 3.60)
Pulmonary artery and valve defects:
25th: 1.14(0.62, 2.10)
50th: 0.79 (0.41,1.55)
75th: 0.68 (0.33,1.40)
Ventricular septal defects:
25th: 0.83 (0.61,1.11)
50th: 1.12 (0.85,1.48)
75th: 0.98 (0.73,1.32)
Multiple Cardiac Defects
July 2009
E-566
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Conotruncal defects:
25th: 1.13 (0.79,1.62)
50th: 1.20 (0.84,1.72)
75th: 1.26 (0.86,1.84)
Endocardial cushion and mitral valve
defects:
25th: 0.82 (0.54,1.25)
50th: 0.66 (0.42,1.05)
75th: 0.63 (0.38,1.03)
Isolated Oral Clefts
Cleft lip with or without palate:
25th: 1.29 (0.90,1.85)
50th: 1.45 (1.01, 2.07)
75th: 1.37 (0.94,2.00)
Cleft palate:
25th: 0.99 (0.55,1.78)
50th: 1.14 (0.64, 2.03)
75th: 1.11 (0.60, 2.06)
Individual Birth Defects
Aortic valve stenosis:
25th: 0.91 (0.53,1.57)
50th: 0.86 (0.50,1.50)
75th: 1.12 (0.63,1.99)
Atrial septal defects:
25th: 1.10 (0.89,1.35)
50th: 1.28 (1.04,1.57)
75th: 1.26 (1.03,1.55)
Coarctation of the aorta:
25th: 0.78 (0.53,1.15)
50th: 0.68 (0.45,1.02)
75th: 0.75 (0.48,1.15)
Endocardial cushion defects:
25th: 0.87 (0.49,1.55)
50th: 1.12 (0.64,1.96)
75th: 0.89 (0.47,1.65)
Ostium secundum:
25th: 1.15 (0.85,1.55)
50th: 1.13 (0.83,1.53)
75th: 1.06 (0.77,1.48)
Pulmonary artery atresia without
ventricular septal defects:
25th: 1.93 (1.08, 3.45)
50th: 2.01 (1.11,3.64)
75th: 0.86 (0.41,1.83)
Pulmonary valve stenosis:
25th: 1.16 (0.88,1.55)
July 2009
E-567
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
50th: 1.25 (0.94,1.66)
75th: 1.27 (0.94,1.71)
Tetralogy of Fallot:
25th: 1.21 (0.72, 2.01)
50th: 1.40 (0.84,2.33)
75th: 1.45 0.85, 2.48)
Ventricular septal defects:
25th: 1.06 (0.90,1.24)
50th: 1.10 (0.94,1.29)
75th: 1.08 (0.92,1.27)
Reference: Gouveia et al. (2004,
055613)
Period of Study: 1997
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Outcome: birth weight
Age Groups: singleton full term live
births within 1000 g to 5500 g
Study Design: Cross sectional study
N: 179,460 live births
Monitoring Stations: maximum of 12
Statistical Analyses: GAM and Logistic sites
regression models
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 60.3 (25.2)
Range (Min, Max): (25.5-153.0)
Covariates: maternal age, length of
gestation, season, infant gender,
maternal education, number of antenatal
care visits, parity, and the type of
delivery q3
Season: All seasons
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: S-Plus 2000
Copollutant (correlation): CO: r - 0.9
SO?
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3
Mean [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Changes in birth weight (in g)
First trimester - -13.7 (-27.0, -0.4)
Second trimester - -4.4 (-18.9,10.1)
Third trimester - 14.6 (0.0, 29.2)
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
(RR estimates are adjusted odds ratios
for low birth weight according to
quartiles of air pollution in each trimester
of pregnancy.)
1st quartile
First trimester - 1 (REF)
Second trimester - 1 (REF)
Third trimester - 1 (REF)
2nd quartile
First trimester - 1.105 (0.994,1.229)
Second trimester - 1.003 (0.904,1.113)
Third trimester - 1.004 (0.914,1.104)
3,d quartile
First trimester - 1.049 (0.903,1.219)
Second trimester - 1.074 (0.920,1.254)
Third trimester - 1.003 (0.861,1.169)
4th quartile
First trimester - 1.144 (0.878,1.491)
Second trimester - 1.252 (1.028,1.525)
Third trimester - 0.970 (0.780,1.205)
Multiple linear regression coefficients
(SE) obtained from single, dual, and three
pollutant models
Single pollutant model - -1.37 (0.68)
Two pollutant (PMio and CO) - -0.51
(0.87)
Two pollutant (PMio and SO2) - -0.94
(0.75)
Three pollutant - -0.47 (0.88)
July 2009
E-568
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ha et al. (2003, 042552)
Period of Study: Jan 1995-Dec 1999
Location: Seoul, South Korea
Outcome: Postneonate total and
respiratory mortality
Age Groups: 1 month-1 yr
2 yr-65 yr, > 65 yr
Study Design: Time-series
N: 1045 post neonate deaths, 67,597 2-
65 yr old deaths, 100,316 > 65 yr old
deaths
Statistical Analyses: Generalized
additive model
Covariates: Seasonality, temperature,
relative humidity, day of the week
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: S Plus
Lags Considered: 0,1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
moving averages from 1-5 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 69.2 (31.6)
Percentiles: 25th: 44.8
50th(Median): 64.2
75th: 87.7
Range (Min, Max): 10.5/yglm3,
245.4 /yg/m3
Monitoring Stations: 27
Copollutant (correlation):
NO?: r - 0.73
S02: r - 0.62
0a: r - -0.02
CO: r - 0.63
PM Increment: 42.9/yglm3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Total Mortality:
1 month-1 yr (post-neonates):
1.142(1.096,1.190] lag 0
2 yr-65 yr:
1.008(1.006,1.010] lag 0
>65 yr (elderly):
1.023(1.023,1.024] lag 0
Respiratory Mortality:
1 month-1 yr (post-neonates):
2.018(1.784, 2.283] lag 0
2 yr-65 yr:
1.066(1.044,1.090] lag 0
>65 yr (elderly):
1.063(1.055,1.072] lag 0
Reference: Hansen, et al. (2006,
089818)
Period of Study: July 1, 2000- June 30,
2003
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Outcome: Pre term birth (< 37 weeks)
Age Groups: newborn babies
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 1583 live pre terms births
28,200 singleton live births
Statistical Analyses: Multiple logistic
regression models
Covariates: Neonate gender, mother's
age, parity, indigenous status, number of
antenatal visits, marital status, number of
previous abortions/miscarriages, type of
delivery, and index of SES
Season: all
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: SAS version 8.2
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: recorded hourly,
averaged daily
Mean (SD): 19.6 (9.4)
Range (Min, Max): 4.9,171.7
Monitoring Stations: 5
Copollutant (correlation):
Fine PM or bsp, 0.1 to < 2.5 /yg in
diameter (0.58 to 0.76)
O3 (0.54 to 0.83)
NO? (0.54 to 0.75)
PM10 (0.80 to 0.93)
Note: Correlations presented are for the
individual pollutant across monitoring
stations (not correlations between PM10
and the pollutant.)
PM Increment: Trimester One
4.5/yg/m3
Last 90 days prior to birth
5.7/yg/m3
Odds Ratio [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Trimester one
1.15 [1.06,1.25]
Last 90 days prior to birth
1.04 [0.92,1.16]
Reference: Hansen et al. (2007,
090703)
Period of Study: Jul 2000-Jun 2003
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Outcome: Birth weight and Small for
Gestational Age (SGA
< 10th percentile for age and gender)
head circumference (HC) and crown-heel
length (CHL) among subsample
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 26,617 births (birth weight analysis)
and 21,432 (HC and CHL analyses)
Statistical Analyses: Logistic (SGA) and
linear (birth weight, HC, CHL) regressions
Covariates: gender, gestational age
(with a quadratic term), maternal age,
parity, number of previous
abortions/miscarriages, marital status,
indigenous status, number of antenatal
visits, type of delivery, an index of SES,
and season of birth
Season:
as a covariate
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: Trimester and monthly
averages were used in analyses
(calculated as the mean of daily values
hourly data was use to calculate daily
means
city-wide avg used)
Mean (SD): 19.6 (9.4)
Percentiles: 25th: 14.6
50th: 18.1
75th: 22.7
Range (Min, Max): (4.9,171.7)
Monitoring Stations: 5
Copollutant (correlation): By
trimesters:
PM10TI:
PM Increment: IQR (8.1 /yg/m3)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Change (0) in mean birth weight (g)
associated with trimester-specific
exposures
Trimester 1:
Continuous exposure: -3.2 (-11.9, 5.5)
Quartiles of exposure:
1: Ref
2: -4.7 (-19.7,10.2)
3: 4.2(-12.9, 21.3)
4:-0.2 (-19.2,18.8)
p-trend: 0.864
Trimester 2:
Continuous exposure: 0.4 (-9.4,10.2)
July 2009
E-569
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Dose-response Investigated? Yes,
assessed exposures as quartiles
Statistical Package: SAS v8.2
PMio T2: r - 0.12
PM10 T3: r - -0.55
O3 T1: r - 0.77
O3 T2: r - 0.28
O3 T3: r - -0.61
NO2TI: r - 0.32
NO2 T2: r - -0.65
NO2 T3: r - -0.17
visibility reducing particles (bsp) T1:
r - 0.82
visibility reducing particles (bsp) T2: r — -
.15
visibility reducing particles (bsp) T3: r — -
0.50
PM10TI: r - 0.12
PM10 T2:
PM10 T3: r - 0.04
O3 T1: r - -0.11
O3 T2: r - 0.80
O3 T3: r - 0.18
NO2TI: r - 0.77
NO2T2: r - 0.25
NO2 T3: r - -0.72
visibility reducing particles (bsp) T1:
r - 0.23
visibility reducing particles (bsp) T2:
r - 0.80
visibility reducing particles (bsp) T3: r — -
0.24
PM10TI: r - -0.55
PM10 T2: r - 0.04
PM10 T3:
O3 T1: r - -0.56
O3 T2: r - -0.18
O3 T3: r - 0.81
NO2TI: r - -0.20
NO2T2: r - 0.75
NO2 T3: r - 0.22
visibility reducing particles (bsp) T1: r — -
0.62
visibility reducing particles (bsp) T2:
r - 0.19
visibility reducing particles (bsp) T3:
r - 0.79
Quartiles of exposure:
1: Ref
2: 12.7 (-2.3, 27.6)
3: 7.6 (-10.6, 25.7)
4: 1.0(-18.7, 20.7)
p-trend: 0.922
Trimester 3:
Continuous exposure: 3.6 (-6.9,14.0)
Quartiles of exposure:
1: Ref
2: 2.9 (-12.8,18.7)
3: 18.5(0.0, 36.9)
4: 4.3(-15.8, 24.4)
p-trend: 0.524
ORs for SGA associated with
trimester-specific exposures
Trimester 1:
Continuous exposure: 1.04 (0.96,1.12)
Quartiles of exposure:
1: Ref
2: 1.23(1.07,1.42)
3: 1.12(0.95,1.31)
4: 1.12(0.94,1.34)
p-trend: 0.361
Trimester 2:
Continuous exposure: 0.95 (0.88,1.04)
Quartiles of exposure:
1: Ref
2: 0.96 (0.83,1.11)
3: 1.06 (0.89,1.25)
4: 0.98 (0.81,1.18)
p-trend: 0.962
Trimester 3:
Continuous exposure: 0.93 (0.85,1.03)
Quartiles of exposure:
1: Ref
2: 0.90 (0.78,1.04)
3: 0.81 (0.68, 0.96)
4: 0.86 (0.71,1.04)
p-trend: 0.098
Change (0) in mean head
circumference (HC
cm) associated with trimester-specific
exposures
Trimester 1:
Continuous exposure: -0.01 (-0.04, 0.02)
July 2009
E-570
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
~uartiles of exposure:
1: Ref
2: -0.02 (-0.07, 0.04)
3: -0.02 (-0.08, 0.04)
4: -0.02 (-0.08, 0.05)
p-trend: 0.605
Trimester 2:
Continuous exposure: -0.01 (-0.04, 0.02)
~uartiles of exposure:
1: Ref
2: 0.03 (-0.02, 0.08)
3: 0.00 (-0.06, 0.06)
4: -0.01 (-0.08, 0.05)
p-trend: 0.538
Trimester 3:
Continuous exposure: 0.02 (-0.02, 0.05)
~uartiles of exposure:
1: Ref
2: 0.02 (-0.04, 0.07)
3: 0.07(0.01,0.13)
4: 0.04 (-0.03,0.11)
p-trend: 0.171
Change (0) in mean crown-heel length
(CHL
cm) associated with trimester-specific
exposures
Trimester 1:
Continuous exposure: 0.00 (-0.05, 0.05)
~uartiles of exposure:
1: Ref
2: 0.02 (-0.07, 0.11)
3: 0.01 (-0.10,0.11)
4: 0.04 (-0.07,0.16)
p-trend: 0.511
Trimester 2:
Continuous exposure: 0.07 (0.01, 0.13)
~uartiles of exposure:
1: Ref
2: 0.10(0.01,0.18)
3: 0.11 (0.00, 0.21)
4: 0.13(0.01,0.24)
p-trend: 0.049
Trimester 3:
Continuous exposure: -0.01 (-0.07, 0.05)
~uartiles of exposure:
1: Ref
July 2009
E-571
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
2:
¦0.02 (-0.11,0.07)
3:
0.10 (-0.01, 0.21)
4:
¦0.01 (-0.13, 0.10)
p-trend: 0.883
Reference: (Hansen et al„ 2009,
192362)
Period of Study: 1/1997-12/2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Outcome: birth defects- artery and valve, Pollutant: PMio
atrial and ventricular septal, conotruncal,
endocardial cushion and mitral valve, cleft Averaging Time: daily
lip and palate
Study Design: Case-control
Mean (SD) Unit: 18.0//gfm
Range (Min, Max): (4.4,151.7)
Covariates: mother s age, marital status, „ „ .
... , , ¦ . Copollutant correlation: NR
indigenous status, previous pregnancies, r
last menstrual period, area-level
socioeconomic status, distance to a
pollution monitor
Statistical Analysis: Conditional logistic
regression
Statistical Package: R
Age Groups: neonates
Increment: 4/yg/m3
Odds Ratios (95% CI) for risk of defect
Aortic Artery and Valve Defects
All Births, Matched: 1.10(0.76-1.56)
Births ~ 12km to Monitor: 1.83 (1.16-
2.98)
Births ~ 6km to Monitor: 1.43 (0.73-
2.90)
All Births, Unmatched: 1.09 (0.84-1.39)
Atrial Septal Defects
All Births, Matched: 1.06 (0.86-1.30)
Births ~ 12km to Monitor: 1.07 (0.84-
1.37)
Births ~ 6km to Monitor: 0.88 (0.60-
1.27)
All Births, Unmatched: 1.14(0.98-1.33)
Pulmonary Artery and Valve Defects
All Births, Matched: 0.90 (0.61-1.29)
Births ~ 12km to Monitor: 0.69 (0.43-
1.08)
Births ~ 6km to Monitor: 1.46 (0.76-
2.73)
All Births, Unmatched: 0.99 (0.78-1.24)
Ventricular Septal Defects
All Births, Matched: 0.87 (0.73-1.04)
Births ~ 12km to Monitor: 0.85 (0.69-
1.03)
Births ~ 6km to Monitor: 0.90 (0.68-
1.18)
All Births, Unmatched: 1.15 (1.02-1.30)
Conotruncal Defects
All Births, Matched: 0.80 (0.54-1.19)
Births ~ 12km to Monitor: 0.94 (0.55-
1.49)
Births ~ 6km to Monitor: 0.66 (0.27-
1.45)
All Births, Unmatched: 0.97 (0.74-1.24)
Endocardial Cushion and Mitral Valve
Defects
All Births, Matched: 1.29 (0.82-2.04)
Births ~ 12km to Monitor: 1.28 (0.75-
2.19)
Births ~ 6km to Monitor: 0.90 (0.44-
1.86)
All Births, Unmatched: 0.94 (0.68-1.26)
Cleft Lip
July 2009
E-572
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
All Births, Matched: 1.05 (0.72-1.51)
Births ~ 12km to Monitor: 1.16 (0.72-
1.82)
Births ~ 6km to Monitor: 1.03 (0.56-
1.82)
All Births, Unmatched: 1.01 (0.79-1.27)
Cleft Palate
All Births, Matched: 0.69 (0.50-0.93)
Births ~ 12km to Monitor: 0.53 (0.29-
0.87)
Births ~ 6km to Monitor: 0.71 (0.49-
1.00)
All Births, Unmatched: 0.89 (0.72-1.10)
Cleft Lip with or without Cleft Palate
All Births, Matched: 1.05 (0.84-1.30)
Births ~ 12km to Monitor: 1.03 (0.79-
1.34)
Births ~ 6km to Monitor: 0.83 (0.58-
1.19)
All Births, Unmatched: 1.04 (0.89-1.21)
July 2009
E-573
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Jalaludin et al. (2007, Outcome: Gestational age (categorized:
156601) preterm birth: < 37 weeks
Period of Study: 1998-2000 term birth: a 37 weeks but < 42 weeks)
Location: Sydney, Australia Age Groups: infants
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 123,840 singleton births of > 20
weeks gestation
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression
Covariates: sex of child, maternal age,
maternal smoking during pregnancy,
gestational age at first antenatal visit,
whether mother identifies as being
Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander,
whether first pregnancy, season of
conception, SES, (temperature and
relative humidity were not significant in
single variable models and therefore,
were not included)
Season: examined as covariate and
effect modifier
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS v8
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h averages used to
calculate the mean concentration over
the first trimester, the 3 months
preceding birth, the first month after the
estimated date of conception, and the
month prior to delivery
Mean (SD): (24 hr averages)
All year: 16.3 (6.38)
summer: 18.2 (7.20)
Autumn: 17.0 (6.23)
Winter: 14.5(5.57)
Spring: 15.7 (5.82)
Monitoring Stations: 14 stations within
the Sydney metropolitan area (levels
averaged to provide one estimate for the
entire study area)
Copollutant (correlation): PMio
PM2.B (r - 0.83)
CO (r - 0.28)
N0?(r - 0.48)
O3 (r - 0.50)
SO2 (r - 0.42)
Notes: Correlations between monitoring
stations measuring PMio ranged from
0.67 to 0.91
PM Increment: 1 /yglm3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
ORs (air pollutant concentration during
the 1st trimester and preterm birth by
season)
Autumn: 1.462 (1.267,1.688)
Winter: 1.343 (1.190,1.516)
Spring: 1.119(0.973,1.288)
Summer: 0.913 (0.889, 0.937)
ORs (air pollutant concentrations during
different exposure periods and preterm
birth
for all of Sydney and among only those
residing within 5 km of a monitoring
station)
1 month preceding birth
Sydney: 0.991 (0.979,1.003)
5km: 1.008 (0.993,1.022)
3 months preceding birth
Sydney: 0.989 (0.975,1.004)
5km: 1.012 (0.995,1.030)
1st month of gestation
Sydney: 0.983 (0.973, 0.993)
5km: 0.957 (0.914,1.002)
1st trimester
Sydney: 0.987 (0.973,1.001)
5km: 1.009 (0.978,1.041)
Notes: Authors note that effect of PMio
on preterm birth for infants conceived
during the autumn did not remain in 2
pollutant models (ORs between 0.77 and
1.04)
July 2009
E-574
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Kaiser et al. (2004, 076674)
Period of Study: 1995-1997
Location: 25 US counties (23
metropolitan areas): Jackson, AL
Fresno, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Sacramento, CA
San Diego, CA
San Francisco, CA
Denver, CO
Hartford, CT
Cook, IL
Baltimore, MD
Wayne, Ml
St. Louis, MO
Bronx, NY
Kings, NY
New York, NY
Philadelphia, PA
El Paso, TX
Harris, TX
Dallas, TX
Oklahoma, OK
Tulsa, OK
Providence, Rl
Salt Lake City, LIT
King, WA
Milwaukee, Wl
Outcome: Postneonatal death:
All cause, SIDS (798.0)
Respiratory disease (460-519)
Age Groups: infants between 1-12
months
Study Design: Attributable risk
assessment
N: 700,000 infants (# deaths NR)
Statistical Analyses: Risk assessment
methods described in: Kunzli et al. Public-
health impact of outdoor and traffic-
related air pollution: a European
assessment. Lancet 2000, 356: 795-801.
Covariates: Maternal education,
maternal ethnicity, parental marital
status, maternal smoking during
pregnancy, infant's month and year of
birth, avg temperature in the first 2
months of life
Season: All
adjusted for monthfyear of birth
Dose-response Investigated? NR
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: Annual, county-level
mean
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: "annual mean levels" in
each county
Mean (SD): 28.4
Range (Min, Max):
County range: 18.0, 44.8
Monitoring Stations: NR
Notes: 14 out of 25 counties had PMio
levels >25//g/m3
PM Increment: Analysis 1:
16.4//g/m3 (difference between reference
level of 12 //g/m3 and observed mean
level of 28.4 //g/m3)
Analysis 2:
13 //g/m3 (difference between reference
level of 12 //g/m3 and 25 //g/m3)
AR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Analysis 1:
All cause 6% [3,11]
SIDS 16% [9, 23]
Respiratory 24% [7, 44]
Attributable # deaths per 100,000
infants:
All cause 14.7 [7.3, 25.6]
SIDS 11.7 [6.8,16.6]
Respiratory 2.3 [0.7, 4.1]
Analysis 2:
All cause 5% [2, 8]
SIDS 12% [7,18]
Respiratory 19% [6, 34]
Attributable # deaths per 100,000
infants:
All cause 10.9 [5.5,19.1]
SIDS 9.0 [5.3,12.8]
Respiratory 1.8 [0.5, 3.2]
Notes: -Authors did not extrapolate
attributable cases below 12 //g/m3 (i.e.,
reference level was set at 12 //g/m3)
-Attributable risks are based on the RRs
reported by Woodruff et al, 1997 for a
10//g/m3 increase:
All cause 1.04(1.02-1.07]
SIDS 1.12 [1.07,1.17]
Respiratory 1.20 [1.06,1.36]
Reference: (Kim et al., 2007,156642)
Period of Study: May 1, 2001-May 31,
2004
Location: Seoul, Korea
Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10): LBW (low
birth weight, less than 2500 g at later
than gestational week 37), premature
delivery (birth before the completion of
the 37th week), stillbirth (intrauterine
fetal death), IUGR (birth weight lower
than the 10th percentile for the given
gestational age), and congenital anomaly
(a defect in the infant's body structure)
Age Groups: Infants
Study Design: Cross-sectional (women
visiting the clinic for prenatal care were
recruited with follow-up until discharge
after delivery)
N: 1514 observations (births)
Statistical Analyses: multiple logistic
and linear regression (in addition, for birth
weight, used generalized additive model
to account for long-term trends and
nonlinear relationships between the
response variable and the predictors, and
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: Used hourly exposure
levels to calculate avg exposure levels at
each trimester, each month of pregnancy,
and 6 weeks before delivery from the
nearest monitoring station (based on
home address of mother)
also created categories within each
pregnancy period (<25th percentile
[referent], 25th to 50th percentile, and
> 50th percentile)
Mean (SD): Range of PM means across
pregnancy periods: 88.7-89.7
Monitoring Stations: 27 stations
PM increment: 10//g/m3
Preterm:
1st Trimester Odds Ratios:
Crude: 0.95 (0.90,1.01)
Adj 1:0.93 (0.87,1.00)
Adj 2: 0.93 (0.85,1.01)
2nd Trimester Odds Ratios:
Crude: 0.99 (0.94,1.06)
Adj 1: 0.98 (0.92,1.04)
Adj 2: 1.00 (0.93,1.07)
3,d Trimester Odds Ratios:
Crude: 1.02 (0.98,1.06)
Adj 1:1.05 (1.00,1.10)
Adj 2: 1.05 (0.99,1.11)
July 2009
E-575
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
to produce smoothed plots of the
relationship between PM and birth
weight)
Covariates: Adjustment 1: infant sex,
infant order, maternal age and education,
paternal education, season of birth
Adjustment 2: adjustment 1 factors plus
alcohol, maternal BMI, maternal weight
prior to delivery
(collected information on smoking, ETS,
parity, past history of illnesses, history of
illnesses during pregnancy but did not use
in analyses due to small numbers or non-
significance)
Season: adjusted for season of delivery
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: SAS 8.01, S-Plus
2000
LBW:
T'Trimester Odds Ratios:
Crude: 1.02 (0.93,1.12)
Adj 1:1.03 (0.93,1.14)
Adj 2: 1.07 (0.96,1.19)
2nd Trimester Odds Ratios:
Crude: 1.03 (0.94,1.14)
Adj 1: 1.04 (0.93,1.17)
Adj 2: 1.07 (0.94,1.22)
3,d Trimester Odds Ratios:
Crude: 1.04 (0.97,1.11)
Adj 1:1.05 (0.97,1.14)
Adj 2: 1.05 (0.96,1.16)
IUGR:
T'Trimester Odds Ratios:
Crude: 1.07 (0.97,1.19)
Adj 1: 1.07 (0.95,1.21)
Adj 2: 1.14 (0.99,1.31)
2nd Trimester Odds Ratios:
Crude: 0.97 (0.85,1.12)
Adj 1:0.97 (0.82,1.13)
Adj 2: 0.93 (0.77,1.13)
3,d Trimester Odds Ratios:
Crude: 0.82 (0.68,0.99)
Adj 1:0.88 (0.72,1.08)
Adj 2: 0.85 (0.67,1.08)
Birth defect:
T'Trimester Odds Ratios:
Crude: 1.08 (0.98,1.20)
Adj 1:1.12 (1.00,1.25)
Adj 2: 1.08 (0.95,1.22)
2nd Trimester Odds Ratios:
Crude: 1.09 (0.99,1.21)
Adj 1: 1.11 (0.98,1.26)
Adj 2: 1.16 (1.00,1.34)
3,d Trimester Odds Ratios:
Crude: 1.00 (0.90,1.11)
Adj 1: 0.97 (0.86,1.08)
Adj 2: 0.97 (0.87,1.10)
Stillbirth:
T'Trimester Odds Ratios:
Crude: 0.83 (0.76,0.90)
Adj 1:0.93 (0.85,1.02)
Adj 2: 0.95 (0.85,1.02)
2nd Trimester Odds Ratios:
July 2009
E-576
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Crude: 0.99 (0.93,1.05)
Adj 1: 1.03 (0.95,1.11)
Adj 2: 1.07 (0.98,1.17)
3,d Trimester Odds Ratios:
Crude: 1.14(1.10,1.18)
Adj 1:1.09 (1.04,1.15)
Adj 2: 1.08 (1.02,1.14)
LBW (categorical PM exposure):
1" Trimester ORs:
< 25th: 1.0
25th-50th: 0.5(0.1,3.2)
> 50th: 1.0(0.3,3.8)
3,d Trimester ORs:
< 25th: 1.0
25th-50th: 1.3(0.2,10.4)
> 50th: 3.0(0.5,18.5)
6 wk before birth ORs:
< 25th: 1.0
25th-50th: 3.2(0.3,33.7)
> 50th: 5.2(0.6,47.6)
Changes in Birth Weight (95%CI) per
10 //gf'nr1 increase in PM
concentration: 1st trimester: 7.8 (1.2,
14.5)
2nd trimester:-0.3 (-7.3, 6.8)
3rd trimester: -2.1 (-7.5, 3.4)
1st month: 4.4 (-1.0, 9.8)
2nd month: 6.4 (0.6,12.2)
3,d month: 4.3 (-1.5,10.2)
4th month: 3.0 (-3.7, 9.6)
5th month: -3.9 (-10.5, 2.7)
6th month: 0.1
(-5.7, 5.8)
7th month: 0.1 (-5.1, 5.3)
8th month: 0.0 (-4.5,4.5)
9th month: 1.8 (-2.3, 5.9)
Last 6 wk: -4.8 (-9.9, 0.4)
July 2009
E-577
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Lee et al. (2003, 043202)
Period of Study: Jan 1,1996-Dec 31
1998
Location: Seoul, South Korea
Outcome: Low birth weight (LBW),
< 2500 g
Age Groups: child-bearing age women
and their newborn children - delivered at
37-44 gestational weeks
Study Design: Cross-section
N: 388,905 full-term single births
Statistical Analyses: Generalized
additive model, LOESS, Akaike's criterion,
Covariates: Infant sex, birth order,
maternal age, parental education level,
time trend and gestational age.
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: NR
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: Arithmetic avg of
hourly measurements at 20 stations
Mean (SD): 71.1 (30.1)
Percentiles: 25th: 47.4
50th(Median): 67.6
75th: 89.3
Range (Min, Max): 18.4, 236.9
Monitoring Stations: 20
Copollutant (correlation):
1st trimester:
PMio—C0: 0.47
PM10-SO2: 0.78
PM10-NO2: 0.66
2nd trimester:
PM10-CO: 0.68
PM10-SO2: 0.82
PM10-NO2: 0.81
3,d trimester:
PM10-CO: 0.69
PM10-SO2: 0.85
PM10-NO2: 0.80
PM Increment: IQR, 41.9
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
1 st trimester: 1.03 [1.00,1.07]
2nd trimester: 1.04(1.00,1.08]
3rd trimester: 1.00 (0.95,1.04]
All trimesters: 1.06 (1.01,1.10]
Low exposure in last 5 months using IQR
during last 5 months: 0.94 (0.85,1.05]
Low exposure in first 5 months using IQR
during first 5 months: 1.04 [1.01,1.08]
Notes: Birth weight was decreased by
19.6 g for an IQR increase in the 2nd
trimester.
The OR for LBW increased for female
children, fourth or higher order child,
mother < 20 yrs of age, and low
parental education level.
July 2009
E-578
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Leem et al. (2006, 089828)
Period of Study: 2001-2002
Location: Incheon, Korea
Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10): Age
Groups: Pre term delivery
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: Cases: 2,082
Controls: 50,031
Statistical Analyses: Log-binomial
regression (corrected for overdispersion
used the log link function)
Covariates: Maternal age, parity, sex,
season of birth, and education level of
each parent
Season: Controlled as a covariate
Dose-response Investigated? Yes,
assessed quartiles of exposure
Statistical Package: NR
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: Trimesters (daily
hourly data used to calculate)
Range (Min, Max): Reported ranges
within quartiles by trimester:
1st Trimester:
4: 64.57-106.39
3: 53.84-64.56
2: 45.95-53.83
1: 26.99-45.94
3,d Trimester:
4: 65.63-95.91
3: 56.07-65.62
2: 47.07-56.06
1: 33.12-47.06
Monitoring Stations: 27 monitoring
stations
pollutant levels for each area were
predicted from the levels recorded at the
monitors using ordinary block kriging
Copollutant (correlation):
SO? (r - 0.13)
NO? (r - 0.37)
CO (r - 0.27)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Crude and Adjusted RR for preterm
delivery and exposure during the 1st
trimester
Crude
Quartiles of exposure:
4:1.07(0.95,1.21)
3: 1.02(0.90,1.15)
2: 1.06(0.94,1.20)
1: 1.00
Adjusted
Quartiles of exposure:
4:1.27(1.04,1.56)
3: 1.13(0.94,1.37)
2: 1.14(0.97,1.34)
1: 1.00
p-trend: 0.39
Crude and Adjusted RR for preterm
delivery and exposure during the 3,d
trimester
Crude
Quartiles of exposure:
4: 1.06(0.94,1.20)
3: 1.06(0.94,1.19)
2: 1.05(0.93,1.18)
1: 1.00
Adjusted
Quartiles of exposure:
4: 1.09(0.91,1.30)
3: 1.04 (0.90,1.21)
2: 1.05(0.91,1.20)
1: 1.00
p-trend: 0.33
July 2009
E-579
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Lin et al. (2004, 095787)
Period of Study: 1198-12100
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Outcome: Neonatal death
Age Groups: Neonates (infants 0-28
days after birth)
Study Design: Time series
N: 1096 days, 6697 deaths
Statistical Analyses: Poisson regression
(GAM)
Covariates: Non-parametric LOESS
smoothers to control for: time (long term
trend), temperature, humidity, and day of
week
Also controlled for holidays with linear
term
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: Lag 0, "moving
averages from 2 to 7 days"
Notes: No explicit control for season
apart from temperature
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: Daily values
Mean (SD): 48.62 (21.18)
Range (Min, Max): 13.9,157.3
Monitoring Stations: NR (indicated
more than 1)
Copollutant (correlation):
CO r - 0.71
NO2 r - 0.76
SO? r - 0.80
O3 r = 0.36
PM Increment: 1 /yglm3
Log relative rate (standard error)
lag
Single pollutant model
0.0017 (0.0008)
lag 0
This translates to a 4.0% [95% CI: 0.3,
7.9] increase in neonatal mortality for a
23.3/yg/m3 increase in PM10
Two-pollutant model
0.0000 (0.0011)
lag 0
Notes: -In two pollutant model with PM10
and SO2 (which are highly correlated),
effect of PM disappeared and effect of
SO2 remained constant
- results from pollutant moving averages
from 2 to 7 days not reported, authors
indicate effects only found for lag 0
(same day levels)
- confidence intervals reported in abstract
are incompatible with fBsfstandard errors
and plotted results in text: abstract
indicates a 4% increase in mortality with
95% CI: 2-6 for a 23.3/yglm3 increase in
PM10
July 2009
E-580
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: (Lin et al„ 2004, 089827)
Period of Study: 1995-1997
Location: Taipei and Kaoshiung, Taiwan
Outcome: Low birth weight (<2500
grams)
Age Groups: newborns
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 92,288 infants
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression
Covariates: Gender, birth order,
gestational weeks, season of birth,
maternal age, maternal education,
copollutants
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: The 9-month
pregnancy period for each infant, and
each trimester
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: NR, "daily
measurements"
Mean (SD): Reported by monitoring
station:
1.48.78
2. 46.29
3. 48.79
4. 50.80
5. 52.54
Kaohsiung
1. 69.99
2. 63.39
3. 64.89
4. 75.79
5. 77.27
Monitoring Stations:
10 (5 in each city)
Notes: All pregnant womenfinfants
included in study lived within 3 km of an
air quality monitoring station
Pollution assigned based on nearest air
quality station to the maternal residence
Co-pollutant:
CO, SO?, 03, NO?
PM Increment: Tertiles
Entire pregnancy
T1: <46.4 ppb
T2: 46.4-63.1 ppb
T3: >63.1 ppb
First trimester
T1: <45.8 ppb
T2: 45.8-67.6 ppb
T3: > 67.6 ppb
Second trimester
T1: <44.6 ppb
T2: 44.6-64.2 ppb
T3: >64.2 ppb
Third trimester
T1: <43.7 ppb
T2: 43.7-63.7 ppb
T3: >63.7 ppb
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
Entire pregnancy
T1: 1.00
T2: 0.96 [0.83,1.11]
T3: 0.87 [0.71,1.05]
First trimester
T1: 1.00
T2: 0.96 [0.84,1.09]
T3: 0.97 [0.80,1.17]
Second trimester
T1: 1.00
T2: 1.03 [0.90,1.17]
T3: 1.00 [0.83,1.21]
Third trimester
T1: 1.00
T2: 1.02 [0.90,1.16]
T3: 0.97 [0.81,1.17]
Notes: RR for births in Kaoshiung vs.
Taipei: 1.13 [1.03,1.24]
Reference: Lipfert et al. (2000, 004103) Outcome: Infant mortality
Period of Study: 1990
Location: U.S.
Pollutant: PM10
including respiratory mortality (traditional Averaging Time: Yearly avg used
definition, ICD9 460-519), expanded
definition (adds ICD9 769 and 770)
Age Groups: Infants
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 2,413,762 infants in 180 counties (Ns
differ for various models)
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression
Covariates: mother's smoking,
Mean (SD): 33.1 (9.17) (based on 180
counties)
Range (Min, Max): (16.9, 59)
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant (correlation):
PM10
SO42- (r - 0.10)
J\ISPJVho^norvsulfate_^ortion_o^PMio__
PM Increment: NR (present regression
coefficients)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Presented regression coefficients
(standard errors)
(3 PM exposures regressed jointly)
bold - p < 0.05
Cause of death: All
Birth weight: All
PM10: 0.0114(0.0015)
July 2009
E-581
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
education, marital status, and race
month of birth
and county avg heating degree days
Dose-response Investigated? NR
Statistical Package: NR
(r - 0.91)
CO (r - 0.27)
SO? (r - 0.04)
Notes: TSP-based sulfate was adjusted
for compatibility with the PMio-based
data
S042 :-0.0002 (0.0061)
NSPMio: 0.0115(0.0014)
Cause of death: All
Birth weight: LBW
PMio: 0.0088 (0.0019)
S042-: 0.0265 (0.0080)
NSPMio: 0.0086 (0.0020)
Cause of death: All
Birth weight: normal
PMio: 0.0092 (0.0024)
S042-: -0.0488 (0.0098)
NSPMio: 0.0096 (0.0024)
Cause of death: All neonatal
Birth weight: All
PMio: 0.0126 (0.0018)
S042-: 0.0267 (0.0076)
NSPMio: 0.0126 (0.0018)
Cause of death: All neonatal
Birth weight: LBW
PMio: 0.0086 (0.0022)
S042-: 0.0388 (0.0088)
NSPMio: 0.0093 (0.0022)
Cause of death: All neonatal
Birth wt: normal
PMio: 0.0123 (0.0041)
S042 :-0.0334 (0.0169)
NSPMio: 0.0125 (0.0040)
Cause of death: All post neonatal
Birth wt: All
PMio: 0.0091 (0.0024)
S042 :-0.0474 (0.0100)
NSPMio: 0.0096 (0.0024)
Cause of death: All post neonatal
Birth wt: LBW
PMio: 0.0096 (0.0043)
S042 :-0.0247 (0.0173)
NSPMio: 0.0101 (0.0042)
Cause of death: All post neonatal
Birth wt: normal
PMio: 0.0074 (0.0030)
S042 :-0.0569 (0.0121)
NSPMio: 0.0080 (0.0029)
Cause of death: SIDS
Birth weight: All
PMio: 0.0138 (0.0038)
July 2009
E-582
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
SO42 :-0.1078 (0.0151)
NSPM10: 0.0149 (0.0037)
Cause of death: SIDS
Birth weight: LBW
PM10: 0.0115(0.0088)
SO42 :-0.1378 (0.0337)
NSPM10: 0.0146 (0.0085)
Cause of death: SIDS
Birth weight: normal
PM10: 0.0137 (0.0042)
SO42 :-0.0995 (0.0168)
NSPM10: 0.0147 (0.0041)
Cause of death: All respiratory (ICD9:
460-519,769,770)
Birth weight: All
PM10: 0.0168 (0.0034)
SO42 :0.0706 (0.0146)
NSPM10: 0.0166 (0.0034)
Cause of death: All respiratory (ICD9:
460-519,769,770)
Birth weight: LBW
PM10: 0.0144(0.0038)
SO42 :0.0821 (0.0158)
NSPM10: 0.0139 (0.0038)
Cause of death: All respiratory (ICD9:
460-519,769,770)
Birth weight: normal
PM10: 0.0177 (0.0091)
SO42-: 0.0001 (0.0392)
NSPM10: 0.0118(0.0090)
Cause of death: Respiratory disease
(ICD9: 460-519)
Birth weight: All
PM10: 0.0133 (0.0089)
SO42-: 0.0093 (0.0384)
NSPM10: 0.0134 (0.0089)
Cause of death: Respiratory disease
(ICD9: 460-519)
Birth weight: LBW
PM10: 0.0092 (0.0137)
SO42-: 0.0434 (0.0580)
NSPM10: 0.0089 (0.0138)
Cause of death: Respiratory disease
(ICD9: 460-519)
Birth weight: normal
PM10: 0.0126 (0.0120)
SO42 :-0.0177 (0.0509)
July 2009
E-583
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Maisonet et al. (2001,
016624)
Period of Study: 1994-1996
Location: Northeastern U.S. (6 cities:
Boston, Hartford, Philadelphia,
Pittsburgh, Springfield, Washington DC)
Outcome: Low birth weight (LBW):
infants with a birth weight < 2,500 g
and having a gestational age between 37
and 44 weeks
Age Groups: Term live births (singleton)
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 89,557 infants
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression (LBW) and linear regression
(for reductions in birth weight)
Covariates: gestational age, gender,
birth order, maternal age, race/ethnicity,
years of education, marital status,
adequacy of prenatal care, previous
induced or spontaneous abortions, weight
gain during pregnancy, maternal prenatal
smoking, and alcohol consumption
season
Season: Yes, as covariate
Dose-response Investigated? Yes,
categorical exposure variables assessed
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: Trimester averages
calculated using 24-h measurements
taken every 6 days
Range (Min, Max): Ranges for
categories of exposure:
1st Trimester
< 25th: <24.821
25 to < 50th: 24.821, 30.996
50 to < 75th: 30.997, 36.142
75 to < 95th: 36.143,46.547
> 95th: > 46.548
2nd Trimester
< 25th: <24.702
25 to < 50th: 24.702, 30.294
50 to < 75th: 30.295, 35.410
75 to < 95th: 35.411,43.928
NSPMio: 0.0128 (0.0119)
Associations with SIDS by smoking
status
Smoking status: Yes
Birth weight: Normal
PMio: 0.0202 (0.0073)
S042-: -0.0722 (0.0284)
NSPMio: 0.0206 (0.0071)
Smoking status: No
Birth weight: Normal
PMio: 0.0104 (0.0051)
S042 :-0.1 14 (0.021)
NSPMio: 0.0117 (0.005)
Smoking status: Yes
Birth weight: LBW
PMio: 0.0322 (0.0130)
S042-: -0.0958 (0.0483)
NSPMio: 0.0345 (0.0125)
Smoking status: No
Birth weight: LBW
PMio:-0.0044 (0.012)
S042 :-0.0172 (0.047)
NSPMio:-0.0007 (0.012)
Mean risks (95%CI) between post
neonatal SIDS among normal birth weight
babies
pollutants regressed one at a time
PMio: 1.20(1.02,1.42)
S042 :0.43 (0.37, 0.51)
NSPMio: 1.33 (1.18,1.50)
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3 for analyses
assessing exposures continuously
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
ORs for term LBW by trimester
T'Trimester Crude
< 25th: 1.00
25 to < 50th: 1.02 (0.90,1.14)
50 to < 75th: 0.90 (0.65,1.24)
75 to < 95th: 0.87 (0.58,1.30)
> 95th: 0.89 (0.60,1.33)
Continuous: 0.93 (0.77,1.13)
T'Trimester Adjusted
< 25th: 1.00
25 to < 50th: 1.02 (0.94,1.11)
50 to < 75th: 0.90 (0.78,1.03)
75 to < 95th: 0.85 (0.73,1.00)
> 95th: 0.83 (0.70,0.97)
July 2009
E-584
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Statistical Package: STATA
> 95th: > 43.929
Continuous: 0.93 (0.85,1.00)
3,d Trimester
2nd Trimester Crude
< 25th: <24.702
< 25th: 1.00
25 to < 50th: 24.702, 30.162
25 to < 50th: 1.01 (0.93,1.10)
50 to < 75th: 30.163, 35.642
50 to < 75th: 0.90 (0.66,1.21)
75 to < 95th: 35.643,43.588
75 to < 95th: 0.92 (0.62,1.34)
> 95th: > 43.589
> 95th: 0.90 (0.61,1.33)
Monitoring Stations: 3-4 per city
Continuous: 0.95 (0.78,1.16)
Copollutants: CO, SO2
2nd Trimester Adjusted
< 25th: 1.00
25 to < 50th: 1.06 (0.97,1.15)
50 to < 75th: 0.95 (0.85,1.07)
75 to < 95th: 0.91 (0.79,1.05)
> 95th: 0.77 (0.63,0.95)
Continuous: 0.93 (0.85,1.02)
3,d Trimester Crude
< 25th: 1.00
25 to < 50th: 0.94 (0.85,1.05)
50 to < 75th: 0.86 (0.58,1.25)
75 to < 95th: 0.86 (0.57,1.29)
> 95th: 0.92 (0.61,1.38)
Continuous: 0.95 (0.75,1.20)
3,d Trimester Adjusted
< 25th: 1.00
25 to < 50th: 0.98 (0.87,1.10)
50 to < 75th: 0.92 (0.76,1.11)
75 to < 95th: 0.88 (0.75,1.04)
> 95th: 0.91 (0.77,1.07)
Continuous: 0.96 (0.88,1.06)
Adjusted ORs by race/ethnicity
Whites:
1st Trimester
< 25th: 1.00
25 to < 50th: 1.13 (0.96,1.33)
50 to < 75th: 1.00 (0.92,1.08)
75 to < 95th: 1.00 (0.91,1.09)
> 95th: 0.92 (0.81,1.04)
Continuous: 0.94 (0.90, 0.98)
2nd Trimester
< 25th: 1.00
25 to < 50th: 0.88 (0.77,1.02)
50 to < 75th: 0.95 (0.89,1.02)
75 to < 95th: 0.95 (0.84,1.07)
> 95th: 0.89 (0.64,1.26)
Continuous: 0.96 (0.89,1.04)
July 2009
E-585
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
3,d Trimester
< 25th: 1.00
25 to < 50th: 0.84 (0.64,1.11)
50 to < 75th: 0.91 (0.83,1.01)
75 to < 95th: 0.80 (0.71,0.90)
> 95th: 1.03 (0.86,1.24)
Continuous: 0.95 (0.90,1.00)
African Americans:
1st Trimester
< 25th: 1.00
25 to < 50th: 1.01 (0.98,1.05)
50 to < 75th: 0.88 (0.79, 0.98)
75 to < 95th: 0.83 (0.70, 0.97)
> 95th: 0.81 (0.67,0.99)
Continuous: 0.93 (0.85,1.01)
2nd Trimester
< 25th: 1.00
25 to < 50th: 1.10 (0.93,1.30)
50 to < 75th: 0.95 (0.80,1.12)
75 to < 95th: 0.88 (0.69,1.11)
> 95th: 0.75(0.54,1.03)
Continuous: 0.92 (0.80,1.05)
3,d Trimester
< 25th: 1.00
25 to < 50th: 1.08 (0.92,1.27)
50 to < 75th: 0.89 (0.70,1.12)
75 to < 95th: 0.94 (0.75,1.18)
> 95th: 0.83 (0.71,0.97)
Continuous: 0.99 (0.87,1.11)
Hispanics:
1st Trimester
< 25th: 1.00
25 to < 50th: 0.83 (0.64,1.06)
50 to < 75th: 0.86 (0.70,1.05)
75 to < 95th: 0.79 (0.68, 0.93)
> 95th: 1.36 (1.06,1.75)
Continuous: 0.96 (0.84,1.09)
2nd Trimester
< 25th: 1.00
25 to < 50th: 1.16 (0.84,1.61)
50 to < 75th: 0.86 (0.63,1.19)
75 to < 95th: 0.98 (0.71,1.34)
> 95th: 0.68 (0.38,1.21)
Continuous: 0.92 (0.81,1.05)
3,d Trimester
July 2009
E-586
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
< 25th: 1.00
25 to < 50th: 0.77 (0.55,1.07)
50 to < 75th: 1.12 (0.76,1.66)
75 to < 95th: 0.93 (0.65,1.31)
> 95th: 0.90 (0.55,1.47)
Continuous: 0.96 (0.80,1.15)
Reference: Mannes et al.(2005,
087895)
Period of Study: January 1,1998-
December 31, 2000
Outcome: Risk of SGA and birth weight
Age Groups: all singleton births > 20
weeks and a 400 grams birth weight and
maternal all ages
Location: Metropolitan Sydney, Australia Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 138,056 singleton births
Statistical Analyses: Logistic and linear
regression models
Covariates: sex of child, maternal age,
gestational age, maternal smoking,
gestational age at first antenatal visit,
maternal indigenous status, whether first
pregnancy, season of birth,
socioeconomic status
Season: All seasons
included as covariate
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS v8.02
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 16.8 (7.1)
25th: 12.3
50th(Median): 15.7
75th: 19.9
Range (Min, Max): (3.8-104.0)
Monitoring Stations: up to 14
Copollutants (correlations): CO:
r - 0.26
NO?: r - 0.47
0s: r - 0.52
PM2.6: r - 0.81
PM Increment: 1 /yglm3
Risk of SGA
All births
One month before birth: OR - 1.01
(1.00-1.03)
Third trimester: OR - 1.00 (0.99-1.013)
Second trimester: OR - 1.01 (1.00-1.04)
First trimester: OR - 1.00 (0.98-1.02)
5 km births
One month before birth: OR - 1.00
(0.99-1.02)
Third trimester: OR - 1.01 (0.99-1.02)
Second trimester: OR - 1.02 (1.01-1.03)
First trimester: OR - 1.01 (0.99-1.02)
Change in birth weight
All births
One month before birth: B - -1.21 (-2.31-
¦0.11)
Third trimester: B - -0.95 (-2.30-0.40)
Second trimester: B - -2.05 (-3.36- ¦
0.74)
First trimester: B - -0.14 (-1.37- 1.09)
5 km births
One month before birth: B - -2.98 (-4.25-
¦1.71)
Third trimester: B - -3.84 (-5.35- -2.33)
Second trimester: B - -4.28 (-5.79- ¦
2.77)
First trimester: B - -2.57 (-4.04- -1.10)
Key second trimester findings
Single pollutant model: B - -4.28 (-5.79- ¦
2.77)
2 pollutant (PM10 and CO): B - -3.72
(-6.29-1.15)
2 pollutant (PM10 and NO2): B - -2.65
(-4.32- -0.98)
2 pollutant (PM10 and Osi: B - -5.47
(-7.06-3.88)
4 pollutant (PM10, NO2, CO and O3): B — -
3.27 (-7.05-0.51)
Controlling for exposures in other
pregnancy periods: B - -3.03 (-4.85- ¦
1.21)
July 2009
E-587
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Pereira et al. (1998, 007264) Outcome: Intrauterine mortality (fetuses
over 28 weeks of pregnancy)
Period of Study: Jan 1991-Dec 1992
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Notes: Paper does not focus on PM as a
pollutant of interest.
Study Design: Time-series
N: 730 days with PM measures
Statistical Analyses: Poisson regression
Covariates: Season, day of the week
and weather (temperature and relative
humidity)
Season: Assessed by including 24
indicator variables for month and year
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: Paper focuses on
other pollutants (lags for PM not
reported)
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 hr mean
Mean (SD): 65.04 (27.28)
Range (Min, Max): (14.80,192.80)
Monitoring Stations: 13 (averaged to
provide city-wide pollutant level)
Copollutants (correlation): NO2
(r - 0.45)
SO? (r - 0.74)
CO (r - 0.41)
0s (r - 0.25)
PM Increment: NR (reported only
regression coefficients for PM)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Regression coefficients (standard errors)
for pollutants when considered separately
and simultaneously in the completed
model:
Separately: 0.0008 (0.0006)
Simultaneously: -0.0005 (0.0010)
Reference: Ritz et al. (2000, 012068)
Period of Study: 1989-1993
Location: Southern California
Outcome: Preterm birth (treated
dichotomously as birth at < 37 weeks
gestation
also analyzed continuously)
Age Groups: infants (born vaginally
between 26-44 weeks of gestation)
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 97,158 births
Statistical Analyses: Logistic and linear
regression
Covariates: maternal age, race,
education, parity, interval since the
previous live birth, access to prenatal
care, infant sex, previous low weight or
preterm births, smoking (reported as
"pregnancy complications")
to examine effect modification, authors
conducted stratified analysis by region,
birth and conception seasons, maternal
age, race, education, and infant gender
Season: Some models included season of
birth or conception
also assessed as effect modifier in
stratified analyses
Dose-response Investigated? Examined
adequacy of linear or log-linear relation
using indicator terms for pollutant-avg
quartiles
results presented in Fig 2 (dose-response
demonstrated for last 6 weeks exposure
period)
Statistical Package: NR
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: 24-h averages at 6 day
intervals
averaged pollutant measures for 1, 2, 4,
6, 8,12, and 26 weeks before birth and
the whole pregnancy period
Mean (SD): 6 weeks before birth: 47.5
(15.0)
1st month of pregnancy: 49.3 (16.9)
Range (Min, Max): 6 weeks before birth:
12.3-152.3
1st month of pregnancy: 9.5-178.8
Monitoring Stations: 17 stations (PM
measured at only 8 stations)
Copollutants (correlations):
6 weeks before birth: CO (r - 0.43)
NO2 (r - 0.74)
O3 (r - 0.20)
1st month of pregnancy: CO (r - 0.37)
NO2 (r - 0.71)
O3 (r - 0.23)
Notes: Averaged pollutant measures
taken at the air monitoring station closest
to the residence
PM Increment: 50/yg/m3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
All 8 stations
6 weeks before birth
Crude: 1.20 (1.09,1.33)
2 exposure periods: 1.18 (1.07,1.31)
Other risk factors: 1.15 (1.04,1.26)
Other RFs plus season: 1.15 (1.03,1.29)
Multipollutant model: 1.19 (1.01,1.40)
1st month of pregnancy
Crude: 1.16(1.06,1.26)
2 exposure periods: 1.13 (1.04,1.24)
Other risk factors: 1.09 (1.00,1.19)
Other RFs plus season: 1.09 (0.99,1.20)
Multipollutant model: 1.12 (0.97,1.29)
Coastal stations only
6 weeks before birth
Crude: 1.22 (1.00,1.49)
2 exposure periods: 1.28 (1.04,1.56)
Other risk factors: 1.13 (0.93,1.38)
Other RFs plus season: 1.18 (0.92,1.51)
Multipollutant model: 1.42 (097, 2.01)
1st month of pregnancy
Crude: 1.28 (1.06,1.54)
2 exposure periods: 1.32 (1.09,1.59)
Other risk factors: 1.17 (0.97,1.40)
Other RFs plus season: 0.99 (0.79,1.24)
Multipollutant model: 1.09 (0.83,1.41)
Inland stations only
6 weeks before birth
Crude: 1.27 (1.12,1.44)
2 exposure periods: 1.27 (1.11,1.44)
July 2009
E-588
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Other risk factors: 1.19 (1.05,1.35)
Other RFs plus season: 1.27 (1.10,1.48)
Multipollutant model: 1.18 (0.97,1.43)
1st month of pregnancy
Crude: 1.16(1.04,1.29)
2 exposure periods: 1.16 (1.04,1.29)
Other risk factors: 1.09 (0.98,1.21)
Other RFs plus season: 1.09 (0.97,1.24)
Multipollutant model: 1.11 (0.93,1.33)
Crude estimates for last 6 weeks
exposure by season
Fall: 1.08 (0.88,1.31)
Summer: 1.06 (0.87,1.29)
Winter: 1.33(1.07,1.65)
Spring: 1.81 (1.41,2.31)
Reduction in mean gestation length
for each increase in PMio during last 6
weeks before birth (linear regression
analysis)
Crude: 0.66 (± 0.24) days
Adj: 0.90 (± 0.27) days
Notes: Effect estimates remain stable
when excluding SGA or LBW children or
when restricting preterm births to SGA or
LBW children only (results not presented)
July 2009
E-589
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ritz, et al. (2002, 023227)
Period of Study: 1987-1993
Location: Southern California
(July 1990—July 1993 for Los Angeles,
1989 for Riverside, 1988-1989 for San
Bernardino, and 1987-1989 for Orange
counties
Outcome: 1) aortic defects
2) defects of the atrium and atrium
septum
3) endocardial and mitral valve defects
4) pulmonary artery and valve defects
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h (every 6 days)
PM Component: vehicle emissions
Monitoring Stations: 11 (for PMio)
Notes: The authors did not observe
consistently increased risks and dose-
response patterns for PMio after
controlling for the effects of CO and
ozone on these cardiac defects.
(Quantitative results not shown).
Copollutants (correlations): CO: r ¦
5) conotruncal defects including tetralogy 0.32
of Fallot, transposition of great vessels,
truncus arteriosus communis, double
outlet right ventricle, and
aorticopulmonary window
and 6) ventricular septal defects not
included in the conotruncal category.
Age Groups: all live born infants and
fetal deaths diagnosed between 20
weeks of gestation and 1 year after birth
Study Design: case-control
N: 10,649 infants and fetuses
Statistical Analyses: hierarchical (two-
level) regression model, polytomous
logistic regression, linear model
Covariates: gender, no prenatal care,
multiple births, no siblings, maternal race,
maternal age, maternal education, born
before 1990, season of conception,
Season: all
Dose-response Investigated? Yes, for
ozone and CO, study found a clear dose-
response pattern for aortic septum and
valve and ventricular septal defects and
possibly for conotruncal and pulmonary
artery and valve defects
Statistical Package: SAS
N0?(NR)
03 (NR)
Reference: Ritz et al. (2006, 089819)
Period of Study: 1989-2000
Location: 389 South Coast Air Basin
(SoCAB) zip codes
Outcome: total infant deaths during the
first year of life as well as all respiratory
causes of death (ICD-9 codes 460-519,
769, 770.4,770.7, 770.8, and 770.9
and ICD-10 codes J00-J98, P22.0,
P22.9, P27.1, P27.9, P28.0, P28.4,
P28.5, and P28.9) and sudden infant
death syndrome (SIDS) (ICD-9 code 798.0
and ICD-10 code R95).
Age Groups: infants 0-1 yr
Study Design: Case-control
N: 2,975,059 births and 19,664 infant
deaths
Cases, n - 13,146
Controls, n - 151,015
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression analysis
Covariates: risk factors available on
birth and/or death certificates (maternal
age, race/ethnicity, and education, level
of prenatal care, infant gender, parity,
birth country, and death season)
Season: Death season (spring, summer,
autumn, winter)
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: NR
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): Two weeks before death:
46.2
One month before death: 46.3
Two months before death: 46.3
Six months before death: 46.3
Range (Min, Max): Two weeks before
death: (21.0-83.5)
One month before death: (25.0-77.2)
Two months before death: (27.6-74.2)
Six months before death: (31.3-69.5)
Monitoring Stations: maximum of 31
Copollutants (correlation): Two weeks
before death
CO: r - 0.33
NO?: r - 0.48
Os:r - 0.12
One month before death
CO: r - 0.33
NO?: r - 0.48
Os:r - 0.12
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
All-cause death
2 mo before death
Single-pollutant model:
< 25th - 1.04(1.01-1.06)
25,h-75,h - 0.96 (0.89-1.04)
>75,h - 1.14(1.03-1.27)
Multiple-pollutant model:
< 25th - 1.02 (0.99-1.05)
25th-75th - 0.92 (0.84-1.00)
>75,h - 1.07 (0.95-1.20)
SIDS
2 mo before death:
Single-pollutant model:
< 25th - 1.03 (0.99-1.08)
25th-75th - 0.94 (0.81-1.08)
> 75th - 1.13(0.93-1.36)
Multiple-pollutant model:
< 25th - 1.01 (0.95-1.07)
25th-75th - 0.90 (0.76-1.06)
July 2009
E-590
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Two months before death
> 75th - 0.99 (0.80-1.24)
CO: r - 0.32
Respiratory death
NO?: r - 0.48
2 wl< before death
Os:r - 0.12
Postneonatal deaths (28 d to 1 y)
Six months before death
Single-pollutant model:
CO: r - 0.29
< 25th - 1.05 (1.01-1.10)
NO?: r - 0.44
25th-75th - 1.13(1.01-1.10)
Os:r - 0.16
> 75th - 1.46 (1.13-1.88)
Multiple-pollutant model:
< 25th - 1.04(0.98-1.09)
25th-75th - 1.09 (0.86-1.38)
> 75th - 1.40 (1.03-1.89)
Postneonatal deaths (28 d to 3 mo)
Single-pollutant model:
< 25th - 1.01 (0.95-1.08)
25th-75th - 1.16(0.82-1.63)
>75,h - 1.44(0.96-2.17)
Multiple-pollutant model:
< 25th - 1.00 (0.92-1.09)
25,h-75,h - 0.97 (0.67-1.42)
> 75th - 1.23 (0.76-2.00)
Post neonatal deaths (4-12 mo)
Single-pollutant model:
< 25th - 1.12(1.02-1.23)
25th-75th - 1.08 (0.81-1.44)
>75,h - 1.41 (1.02-1.96)
Multiple-pollutant model:
< 25th - 1.07 (1.00-1.15)
25th-75th - 1.02 (0.75-1.40)
> 75th - 1.36 (0.92-2.01)
July 2009
E-591
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Rogers et al. (2006, 091232)
Period of Study: 1986-1988
Location: Georgia, USA
Outcome: VLBW
Term, AGA, Preterm AGA, Preterm, SGA
Age Groups: Newborns and their
mothers (< 19 to a 35-years-old)
Study Design: case-control
N: 325 infants (69 preterm SGA
59 preterm AGA
197 term AGA) and their mothers
Statistical Analyses: logistic regression
Covariates: maternal age, maternal race,
maternal education, active and passive
smoking, birth season, prepregnancy
weight, pregnancy weight gain, maternal
toxemia, anemia, asthma
Dose-response Investigated? Yes, used
Statistical Package: SUDAAN
Cochran-Armitage test for trend to
determine whether the observed
proportions of cases and controls differed
in a linear manner across exposure
categories.
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: annual
Preterm SGA:
50th(Median): 3.38
Preterm AGA:
50th(Median): 7.84
Term AGA:
50th(Median): 3.23
Monitoring Stations: NR
Percent Mothers Residing In County
With Industrial Point Source
Preterm SGA: 60.9%
Preterm AGA: 79.7%
Term AGA: 60.4%
Percent Mothers Residing In Pmio
Quartile (based on environmental
transport model)
Preterm SGA
1stquartile!<1.48): 31.9%
2nd quartile (1.48-3.74): 18.8%
3rd quartile (3.75-15.07): 26.1%
4th quartile (>15.07): 23.2%
Preterm AGA
1st quartile! <1.48): 16.9%
2nd quartile (1.48-3.74): 22.1%
3rd quartile (3.75-15.07): 28.8%
4th quartile (>15.07): 32.2%
Term AGA
1st quartile (< 1.48): 24.7%
2nd quartile (1.48-3.74): 28.4%
3rd quartile (3.75-15.07): 27.9%
4th quartile (> 15.07): 19.3%
PM Increment: Quartile
Notes: Statistically significant increases
in the odds of VLBW and preterm AGA
births are associated with living in a
county with a PMio point source. Preterm
AGA births are also associated with living
in an area with very high (4th quartile)
estimated PMio exposure.
Delivery of VLBW vs. Term AGA infant
County with point source
2.54(1.46, 4.22]
PMio quartile
1st quartile: reference
2nd quartile:
0.81 [0.42,1.55]
3rd quartile:
0.85(0.45,1.16]
4th quartile:
1.94 [0.98,3.83]
Delivery of Preterm AGA vs. Term AGA
infant
County with point source
4.31 [1.88: 9.87]
PMio quartile
1st quartile: reference
2nd quartile:
1.56(0.56: 4.35]
3rd quartile:
1.19(0.44: 3.23]
4th quartile:
3.68(1.44: 9.44]
Delivery of Preterm AGA vs. Preterm SGA
infant
County with point source
2.07(0.83: 5.16]
PMio quartile
1st quartile: reference
2nd quartile:
1.96(0.59: 6.43]
3rd quartile:
2.10(0.66: 6.73]
4th quartile:
2.58(0.78: 8.51]
July 2009
E-592
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Romieu et al. (2004,
093074)
Period of Study: 1997 to 2001
Location: Ciudad Juarez, Mexico
Outcome: Respiratory-related infant
mortality ICD9 (460-519)
ICD10 (J00-J99)
Age Groups: 1 month to 1 year
Study Design: Case crossover
N: 216 respiratory-related deaths
N - 412 other causes and N - 628 total
deaths
Statistical Analyses: The acute effects
of air pollution was modeled on both total
and respiratory-related mortality as a
function of the pollution levels on the
same day and preceding days and over
two- and three-day averages before the
date of death. Case-crossover with semi-
symmetric bidirectional referent selection
was the approach used. Data were
stratified by day of the week and
calendar month. Data were analyzed with
conditional logistic regression. Second
and third polynomial distributed lag
models were used to study lag structure.
BIC was used to determine lag length.
Covariate: temperature, season
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: STATA 7.0
Lags Considered: 1-15 days
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 1997: 33.04 (20.67)//gfm3
1998: 35.25 (17.32) //g/m3
1999: 45.92 (28.69)//g/m3
2000: 43.38 (23.77)//g/m3
2001:39.46 (29.43) //g/m3
Monitoring Stations: 5 stations in
Ciudad Juarez
2 stations in El Paso (close to US-Mexico
border)
Copollutant (correlation): 0:i: r - 0.01
Notes: Ciudad Juarez monitors measured
PMio every 6 days while El Paso monitors
measured on a daily basis.
PM Increment: 20//g/m3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
Total mortality:
OR - 1.02 (0.94-1.11) lag 1
OR - 1.03 (0.95-1.12) lag 2
OR - 1.03 (0.94-1.13 ac2
OR - 1.04(0.95-1.15) ac3
Respiratory mortality
OR - 0.95 (0.83-1.09) lag 1
OR - 1.04 (0.91-1.19) lag 2
OR - 0.98(0.81-1.19) ac2
OR - 0.97 (0.74-1.26) ac3
Higher SES
OR - 0.82 (0.59,1.14) lag 1
OR - 1.08 (0.84,1.40) lag 2
OR - 0.89 (0.58,1.35) ac2
OR - 0.97 (0.52,1.82) ac3
Medium SES
OR - 0.99 (0.79,1.27) lag 1
OR - 1.11 (0.86,1.43) lag 2
OR - 1.03 (0.73,1.45) ac2
OR - 1.17(0.72,1.90) ac3
Lower SES
OR - 1.61 (0.97-2.66) lag 1
OR - 1.07 (0.65,1.75) lag 2
OR - 2.56 (1.06-6.17) ac2
OR - 1.76(0.59, 5.23) ac3
Notes:
ac2 and ac3 represent cumulative PMio
ambient levels over two or three days
before death.
July 2009
E-593
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Sagiv et al. (2005, 087468)
Period of Study: 1/1/1997-12/31/2001
Location: Allegheny county, Beaver
county, Lackawanna county, Philadelphia
county, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Outcome: Preterm birth (< 36 weeks)
Age Groups: Babies born between 20
and 44 weeks
Study Design: Time series
N: 3704 observation days, 187,997
births
Statistical Analyses: Poisson regression
multivariable mixed-effects model with a
random intercept for each county to
incorporate count-level information.
Covariates: Temperature, dew point
temperature, mean 6-week level of
copollutants (CO, NO2, and SO2), long-
term preterm birth trends
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time: Daily used to calculate
6-week period
Mean (SD): 6-week period
27.1 (8.3)
Daily
25.3(14.6)
Percentiles: 6-week period
50th (Median): 26.0 Daily
50th (Median): 21.6
Range (Min, Max): 6-week period: 8.7,
68.9
Daily: 2.0,156.3
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant (correlation): Daily PM10-
daily SO2: r - 0.46
Also considered CO, NO2 and O3 as
copollutants.
PM Increment: 1) 50 /yglm3 2) Quartiles
(first quartile is the reference)
Exposure period: 6 weeks before birth
Per 50 //g/m3:1.07 (0.98, 1.18)
2nd quartile: 1.00 (0.95,1.05)
3rd quartile: 1.04 (0.99,1.09)
4th quartile: 1.03 (0.98,1.08)
Exposure period: 1-day acute time
windows Per 50/yglm3: 2-day lag: 1.10
(1.00,1.21)
5-day lag: 1.07 (0.98,1.18)
Notes: Within the article, authors provide
a Figure 1 displaying a graph of the
relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence
intervals (CI) for 1- to 7-day lags. While
the authors report the 2- and 5-day lag
RRs and 95% CIs in the text, the others
are not specifically reported. However,
the figure shows the approximate RRs
per 50 /yglm3 as indicated below: 1 -day
lag: 1.05
3-day lag: 1.05
4-day lag: 1.00
6-day lag: 0.97
7-day lag: 1.03
July 2009
E-594
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: (Salam et al„ 2005, 087885) Outcome: Birth weight
Period of Study: 1975-1987 Low birth weight (LBW
Location: Southern California < 2500 g)
Intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR)
Age Groups: Children born full-term
(between 37 and 44 weeks)
Study Design: Cohort study
N: 3901 children
Statistical Analyses: Linear mixed-
effects
Logistic regression
Covariates: Maternal age, months since
last live birth, parity, maternal smoking
during pregnancy, SES, marital status at
childbirth, gestational diabetes, child's
sex, child's race/ethnicity, child's grade in
school (4th, 7th, and 10th), Julian day of
birth
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: SAS
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: Monthly
Mean (SD): Entire pregnancy: 45.8
(12.9)
First trimester: 46.6 (15.9)
Second trimester: 45.4 (14.8)
Third trimester: 45.4 (15.5)
Monitoring Stations: 1 or 3 (See notes)
Copollutant (correlation): Entire
pregnancy
PMio-03[io-6i: r - 0.54
PM 10-03[24 hr): X = 0.20
PMio-NO?: r - 0.55
PMio-CO: r - 0.41
First trimester
PMio-03[io-6i: r - 0.54
PM 10-03[24 hr]: r = 0.34
PMio-NO?: r - 0.48
PMio-CO: r - 0.29
Second trimester
PMio-03[io-6i: r - 0.50
PM 10-03(24 hr): x = 0.27
PMio-NO?: r - 0.53
PMio-CO: r - 0.35
Third trimester
PMio-03[io-6i: r - 0.52
PM 10-03[24 hr]: x = 0.31
PMio-NO?: r - 0.52
PMio-CO: r - 0.37
Notes: Exposure estimates were
calculated by spatially interpolated
monthly averages which were based off
of three monitoring stations located
within 50 km of the ZIP code region of
maternal birth residences.
PM Increment: IQR (interquartile range)
Outcome: birth weight (g)
Single-pollutant model
Entire pregnancy
18//gfm3: -19.9 (-43.6, 3.8)
First trimester
20 //g/m3: -3.0 (-22.7,16.7)
Second trimester
19//gfm3: -15.7 (-36.1, 4.7)
Third trimester
20/yg/m3: -21.7 (-42.2 to -1.1)
Multipollutant model
(included O3
(24 hr) in model
third trimester exposure)
20//gfm3: -10.8 (-31.8,10.2)
Outcome: IUGR (ORs)
Single-pollutant model
Entire pregnancy
18/yg/m3: 1.1 (0.9,1.3)
First trimester
20/yg/m3: 1.0(0.9,1.2)
Second trimester
19/yg/m3: 1.0(0.9,1.2)
Third trimester
20/yg/m3: 1.1 (0.9,1.3)
Outcome: LBW
Single-pollutant model
Entire pregnancy
18/yg/m3: 1.3(0.8,2.2)
First trimester
20/yg/m3: 1.0(0.7,1.5)
Second trimester
19/yg/m3: 1.2(0.8,1.7)
Third trimester
20/yg/m3: 1.3(0.9,1.9)
Notes: Numbers reported for birth weight
outcome are the effects on birth weight
outcome (the change in birth weight in
grams) across the IQR (which vary
depending on air pollutant and duration of
exposure measurement).
July 2009
E-595
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 0-9d, 10-14d and 70-
90d
PMio specific results are given in Figures
3-5. PMio was not significantly
correlated with sperm quality.
Reference: (Sokol et al„ 2006, 098539)
Period of Study: 1/1996-12/1998
Location: Los Angeles, California
Reference: (Suh et al„ 2007,157028)
Period of Study: 2001-2004
Location: Seoul, Korea
Outcome: Semen Quality
Study Design: Panel
Statistical Analysis: Univariate and
Multivariate Regression
Statistical Package: SAS
Age Groups: Males ranging 19-35 in age
Outcome: Birth weight
Age Groups: prenatal follow-up for
newborns
Study Design: based prospective cohort
study
N: 199 pregnant mothers
Statistical Analyses: ANC0VA,
generalized linear models
Covariates: infant's sex, maternal age,
maternal and paternal education, parity,
presence of illness during pregnancy,
delivery month, gestational age (squared)
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: SAS
Mean (SD) Unit: 35.74 ± 13.83//gfm3
Copollutant (correlation): 03, NO2, CO
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h
Mean (SD): 1st trimester: 76.41 (28.80)
2nd trimester: 77.84 (31.63)
3rd trimester: 95.61 (26.15)
Percentiles: 1st trimester
25th: 55.28
50th(Median): 71.09
75th: 92.38
2nd trimester
25th: 48.65
50th(Median): 72.36
75th: 108.00
3rd trimester
25th: 77.10
50th(Median): 96.35
75th: 116.68
Range (Min, Max):
1st trimester (21.00,151.65)
2nd trimester (31.45,139.13)
3rd trimester (23.45,172.75)
Monitoring Stations: 27
Copollutant:
CO
SO?
NO?
PM Increment: Trimester a 90th%ile
compared to < 90th%ile
Least-square (ANC0VA) mean (SE)
All Genotypes
1st trimester
< 90th%ile, N(%): 158 (90.3%): 3253
(37)
> 90th%ile, N(%): 17 (9.7%): 2841 (145)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PMio vs. for < 90th%ile PMio
Adjusted: 0.009
Adjusted, with CO: 0.041
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.092
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.012
2nd trimester
<90th%ile, N(%): 153 (89.5%): 3253
(39)
>90th%ile, N(%): 18(10.5%): 3026
(157)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PMio vs. for < 90th%ile PMio
Adjusted: 0.177
Adjusted, with CO: 0.203
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.151
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.151
3rd trimester
<90th%ile, N(%): 162 (90.5%): 3226
(38)
> 90th%ile, N(%): 17 (9.5%): 3122 (140)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PMio vs. for < 90th%ile PMio
Adjusted: 0.487
Adjusted, with CO: 0.748
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.420
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.466
Genotype Mspl TT
1st trimester
<90th%ile,N(%): 60 (34.3%): 3350
(64)
> 90th%ile, N(%): 5 (2.9%): 3001 (229)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PMio vs. for < 90th%ile PMio
Adjusted: 0.147
Adjusted, with CO: 0.186
July 2009
E-596
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.430
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.155
2nd trimester
<90th%ile, N(%): 59 (34.5%): 3335
(66)
> 90th%ile, N(%): 6 (3.5%): 3281 (249)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PM10 vs. for < 90th%ile PM10
Adjusted: 0.833
Adjusted, with CO: 0.833
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.778
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.806
3rd trimester
< 90th%ile, N(%): 61 (34.1%): 3327
(65)
> 90th%ile, N(%): 6 (3.4%): 3227 (300)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PM10 vs. for < 90th%ile PM10
Adjusted: 0.749
Adjusted, with CO: 0.980
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.635
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.687
Genotype Mspl TC/CC
1st trimester
<90th%ile,N(%): 98 (56.0%): 3193
(48)
> 90th%ile, N(%): 12 (6.9%): 2799 (169)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PM10 vs. for < 90th%ile PM10
Adjusted: 0.033
Adjusted, with CO: 0.073
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.150
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.036
2nd trimester
< 90th%ile, N(%): 94 (55.0%): 3200
(52)
> 90th%ile, N(%): 12 (7.0%): 2933 (176)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PM10 vs. for < 90th%ile PM10
Adjusted: 0.161
Adjusted, with CO: 0.172
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.152
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.158
3rd trimester
<90th%ile, N(%): 101 (56.4%): 3165
(49)
>90th%ile, N(%): 11 (6.2%): 3087 (147)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PM10 vs. for < 90th%ile PM10
July 2009
E-597
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Adjusted: 0.626
Adjusted, with CO: 0.978
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.551
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.614
Genotype Ncol llelle
1st trimester
<90th%ile,N(%): 87 (49.7%): 3244
(52)
> 90th%ile, N(%): 7 (4.0%): 2983 (232)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PM10 vs. for < 90th%ile PM10
Adjusted: 0.289
Adjusted, with CO: 0.344
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.641
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.293
2nd trimester
<90th%ile,N(%): 82 (48.0%): 3243
(55)
> 90th%ile, N(%): 11 (6.4%): 3185 (207)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PM10 vs. for < 90th%ile PM10
Adjusted: 0.790
Adjusted, with CO: 0.783
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.707
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.733
3rd trimester
<90th%ile,N(%): 90 (50.3%): 3239
(53)
> 90th%ile, N(%): 9 (5.0%): 2944 (198)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PM10 vs. for < 90th%ile PM10
Adjusted: 0.161
Adjusted, with CO: 0.279
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.134
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.150
Genotype Ncol MeVal/ValVal
1st trimester
< 90th%ile, N(%): 71 (40.6%): 3262
(56)
>90th%ile, N(%): 10(5.7%): 2773 (171)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PM10 vs. for < 90th%ile PM10
Adjusted: 0.009
Adjusted, with CO: 0.031
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.058
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.010
2nd trimester
< 90th%ile, N(%): 71 (41.5%): 3264
(61)
July 2009
E-598
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
>90th%ile, N(%): 7 (4.1%): 2862 (208)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PMio vs. for < 90th%ile PMio
Adjusted: 0.076
Adjusted, with CO: 0.093
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.063
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.061
3rd trimester
<90th%ile,N(%): 72 (40.2%): 3207
(58)
a 90th%ile, N(%): 8 (4.5%): 3262 (180)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PMio vs. for < 90th%ile PMio
Adjusted: 0.777
Adjusted, with CO: 0.607
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.843
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.791
Reference: Tsai et al. (2006, 098312)
Period of Study: 1994-2000
Location: Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Outcome: post neonatal mortality
Age Groups: infants more than 27 days
and less than 1 year
Study Design: Case-crossover study
N: 207 deaths
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Covariates: temperature, humidity
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS, version 8.2
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 81.45 /yglm3
Percentiles: 25th: 44.50
50th(Median): 79.20
75th: 111.50
Range (Min, Max): (20.50-232.00)
Monitoring Stations: 6
Copollutant: SO2
NO2
CO
0s
PM Increment: 67.00 /yglm3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
OR - 1.040(0.340-3.177)
Note: Air pollution levels at the dates of
infant death were compared with air
pollution levels 1 week before and 1
week after death
a cumulative lag up to 2 previous days
was used to assign exposure.
Reference: (Wilhelm and Ritz, 2005,
188761)
Period of Study: 1994-2000
Location: Los Angeles County, California,
U.S.
Outcome: Term low birth weight (LBW)
(< 2500 g at a 37 completed weeks
gestation), Vaginal birth <37 completed
weeks gestation
Age Groups: LBW: a 37 com|
weeks
Preterm births: < 37 completed weeks
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: For LBW: 136,134
For preterm birth:
106,483
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression
Covariates: Maternal age, maternal race,
maternal education, parity, interval since
previous live birth, level of prenatal care,
infant sex, previous LBW or preterm
infant, birth season, other pollutants (CO,
NO2, 0 i, PMio), gestational age (in birth
weight analysis)
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: NR
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time:
24 hr (every 6 days)
Entire pregnancy
Trimesters of pregnancy
Months of pregnancy
6 weeks before birth
Mean (SD): First trimester: 42.2
Third trimester: 41.5
6 weeks before birth: 39.1
Range (Min, Max):
First trimester: 26.3, 77.4
Third trimester: 25.7, 74.6
6 weeks before birth: 13.0,103.7
Monitoring Stations:
Zip-code-level analysis: 8
PM Increment: 1) 10 /yg/m3
2) 3 levels:
a) < 25%ile (reference)
b) 25%-75%ile
c) > 75%ile
Incidence of LBW (third trimester
exposure)
< 32.8/yg/m3: 2.0(1.8, 2.2)
32.8 to < 43.4//g/m3: 2.0 (1.9, 2.1)
a 43.4/yg/m3: 2.2(2.0, 2.4)
Incidence of preterm birth (first
trimester exposure)
< 32.9/yglm3: 8.7 (8.3, 9.2)
32.9 to < 43.9//g/m3: 8.8 (8.5, 9.1)
>43.9/yg|m3: 8.6(8.1,9.0)
Incidence of preterm birth (6 weeks
before birth exposure)
< 31.8//g/m3: 8.8(8.4,9.3)
July 2009
E-599
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Address-level analysis: 6
Copollutant (correlation!:
First trimester: PM10 CO: r - 0.12
PMio-NO?: r - 0.29
PMio-03: r - -0.01
PMio-PM2.b: r - 0.43
Third trimester: PMio CO: r - 0.32
PMio-NO?: r - 0.45
PMio-(k r - -0.08
PMio-PM2.b: r - 0.52
6 weeks before birth: PMio CO: r -
0.36
PMio-NO?: r - 0.49
PM10-O3: r - -0.16
PM10-PM2.B: r - 0.60
31.8 to <44.1 //g/m3: 8.6 (8.3, 8.9)
> 44.1 //g/m3: 8.8 (8.4, 9.2)
Outcome: LBW
Exposure Period: Third trimester
Address-level analysis:
Single-pollutant model:
Distance ~ 1 mile
Per 10 //g/m3:1.22 (1.05,1.41)
33.4 to < 44.7 //g/m3:1.08 (0.76, 1.52)
>44.7//g/m3: 1.48 (1.00,2.19)
Multipollutant model:
Distance ~ 1 mile
Per 10 //g/m3:1.36 (1.12, 1.65)
33.4 to <44.7 //g/m3:1.16 (0.77, 1.74)
>44.7//g/m3: 1.58 (0.95, 2.62)
Single-pollutant model:
1 < distance ~ 2 mile
Per 10 //g/m3: 0.98 (0.90, 1.06)
33.4 to < 44.7 //g/m3: 0.95 (0.80, 1.13)
>44.7 //g/m3: 0.96 (0.78, 1.18)
Multipollutant model:
1 < distance ~ 2 mile
Per 10 //g/m3:1.02(0.92,1.14)
33.4 to < 44.7 //g/m3: 0.93 (0.77, 1.12)
>44.7 //g/m3: 1.02 (0.79, 1.32)
Single-pollutant model:
2 < distance ~ 4 mile
Per 10 //g/m3:1.03 (0.99, 1.08)
33.9 to < 45.0//g/m3:1.04 (0.96,1.14)
>45.0//g/m3: 1.08 (0.97, 1.20)
Multipollutant model:
2 < distance ~ 4 mile
Per 10//g/m3:1.04 (0.98,1.09)
33.9 to <45.0//g/m3:1.02 (0.92, 1.12)
>45.0//g/m3: 1.06 (0.93, 1.21)
Zip-code-level analysis
Single-pollutant model:
Per 10//g/m3:1.03 (0.97, 1.09)
33.2 to <43.6//g/m3: 0.98 (0.86, 1.1 1)
>43.6//g/m3: 1.03 (0.88, 1.21)
Multipollutant model:
Per 10 //g/m3:1.07 (0.99, 1.15)
33.2 to < 43.6//g/m3: 0.97 (0.85, 1.12)
>43.6//g/m3: 1.09 (0.90, 1.31)
Outcome: LBW
July 2009
E-600
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Exposure Period: Entire pregnancy
period
Address-level analysis:
Multipollutant model:
Per 10//g/m3:1.24 (0.91, 1.70)
Outcome: Preterm Birth
Exposure Period: First trimester of
pregnancy
Address-level analysis:
Single-pollutant model:
Distance ~ 1 mile
Per 10 //g/m3:1.00 (0.93, 1.09)
33.3 to <45.1 //g/m3:1.07 (0.90, 1.26)
>45.1 //g/m3: 1.12(0.91,1.38)
Multipollutant model:
Distance ~ 1 mile
Per 10 //g/m3:1.00 (0.90, 1.12)
33.3 to <45.1//g/m3:1.12 (0.92, 1.36)
>45.1//g/m3: 1.17 (0.90, 1.50)
Single-pollutant model:
1 < distance ~ 2 mile
Per 10 //g/m3:1.01 (0.97, 1.05)
33.7 to <45.3//g/m3:1.03 (0.95, 1.12)
>45.3//g/m3: 1.07 (0.97, 1.19)
Multipollutant model:
1 < distance ~ 2 mile
Per 10//g/m3:1.04 (0.99,1.10)
33.7 to <45.3//g/m3:1.07 (0.98, 1.17)
a 45.3 //g/m3: 1.13 (1.00, 1.27)
Single-pollutant model:
2 < distance ~ 4 mile
Per 10 //g/m3:1.01 (0.99, 1.03)
34.1 to <45.5//g/m3:1.03 (0.99, 1.08)
>45.5//g/m3: 1.02 (0.96, 1.07)
Multipollutant model:
2 < distance ~ 4 mile
Per 10//g/m3: 0.99 (0.97, 1.02)
34.1 to <45.5//g/m3: 0.99 (0.95,1.04)
>45.5//g/m3: 0.94 (0.89,1.01)
Zip-code-level analysis
Single-pollutant model:
Per 10//g/m3: 0.99 (0.96, 1.01)
33.3 to <44.2//g/m3:1.01 (0.95, 1.08)
>44.2//g/m3: 0.98 (0.90, 1.05)
Multipollutant model:
Per 10//g/m3: 0.99 (0.96, 1.03)
July 2009
E-601
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
33.3 to <44.2//g/m3:1.03 (0.97, 1.1 1)
a 44.2 //g/m3: 1.01 (0.92,1.11)
Outcome: Preterm birth
Exposure Period: 6 weeks before birth
Address-level analysis:
Single-pollutant model:
Distance ~ 1 mile
Per 10 //g/m3:1.02 (0.95, 1.10)
32.5 to < 44.8//g/m3:1.09 (0.92, 1.29)
>44.8//g/m3: 1.12 (0.92, 1.37)
Multipollutant model:
Distance ~ 1 mile
Per 10 //g/m3:1.06 (0.97, 1.16)
32.5 to < 44.8//g/m3:1.09 (0.90, 1.31)
>44.8//g/m3: 1.17 (0.91,1.49)
Single-pollutant model:
1 < distance ~ 2 mile
Per 10//g/m3:1.00 (0.96, 1.03)
32.3 to < 45.3//g/m3: 0.99 (0.91, 1.07)
>45.3//g/m3: 0.99 (0.89, 1.10)
Multipollutant model:
1 < distance ~ 2 mile
Per 10 //g/m3:1.01 (0.97, 1.06)
32.3 to <45.3//g/m3:1.00 (0.92, 1.10)
>45.3//g/m3: 1.02 (0.91,1.16)
Single-pollutant model:
2 < distance ~ 4 mile
Per 10 //g/m3: 0.99 (0.98, 1.01)
33.1 to <45.3//g/m3:1.00 (0.96, 1.05)
>45.3//g/m3: 0.98 (0.93, 1.03)
Multipollutant model:
2 < distance ~ 4 mile
Per 10 //g/m3:1.00 (0.98, 1.02)
33.1 to <45.3//g/m3:1.01 (0.96, 1.05)
>45.3//g/m3: 0.98 (0.92,1.04)
Zip-code-level analysis
Single-pollutant model:
Per 10 //g/m3:1.02(0.99,1.04)
32.1 to <44.3//g/m3:1.01 (0.95, 1.07)
>44.3//g/m3: 1.04 (0.96,1.12)
Multipollutant model:
Per 10 //g/m3:1.02 (0.99, 1.06)
32.1 to <44.3//g/m3:1.02 (0.95, 1.09)
a 44.3 //g/m3: 1.04 (0.95,1.14)
Notes: multipollutant model adds
CO,NO?, and 03 in addition to the main
July 2009
E-602
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
pollutant of interest, PMio.
Reference: Woodruff et al. (1997,
084271)
Period of Study: 1989-1991
Location: 86 Metropolitan Statistical
Areas in the US (counties with
populations less than 100,000 were
excluded)
Outcome: Postneonatal mortality (death Pollutant: PM
of an infant between 1 month and 1 yr of
1) all post neonatal deaths
2) normal birth weight (NBW, a 2500 g)
SIDS deaths
3) NBW respiratory deaths
4) low birth weight (LBW) respiratory
death
Respiratory deaths: ICD9 codes 460-519
SIDS: ICD9 code 798.0
Age Groups: infants (1 month-1yr of
age)
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 3,788,079 infants
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression
Covariates: maternal education,
maternal race, parental marital status,
maternal smoking during pregnancy
avg temperature during the first 2 months
of life
infant's month and year of birth
assessed race as an effect modifier (p-val
for interaction terms > 0.2)
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: NR
Averaging Time: Mean of 1st 2 months
of life
analyzed as tertiles of exposure and as
continuous exposure
Mean (SD): 31.4 (7.8)
Range (Min, Max):
Overall: 11.9-68.8
Low category: < 28.0
Medium category: 28.1-40.0
High category: >40.0
Monitoring Stations: NR
PM Increment: 10 //gf'nv1 (for continuous
exposure analysis)
Adjusted ORs for cause-specific post
neonatal mortality by pollution
category (tertiles)
All causes
Low: Ref
Medium: 1.05 (1.01,1.09)
High: 1.10(1.04,1.16)
SIDS, NBW:
Low: Ref
Medium: 1.09 (1.01,1.17)
High: 1.26(1.14,1.39)
Respiratory death, NBW:
Low: Ref
Medium: 1.08 (0.87,1.33)
High: 1.40(1.05,1.85)
Respiratory death, LBW:
Low: Ref
Medium: 0.93 (0.73,1.18)
High: 1.18(0.86,1.61)
All other causes:
Low: Ref
Medium: 1.03 (0.97,1.08)
High: 0.97(0.90,1.04)
Adjusted ORs for a continuous
10//g/m3change in exposure
All causes: 1.04 (1.02,1.07)
SIDS, NBW: 1.12 (1.07,1.17)
Respiratory death, NBW: 1.20 (1.06,
1.36)
Respiratory death, LBW: 1.05 (0.91,
1.22)
All other causes: 1.00 (0.99,1.00)
July 2009
E-603
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Woodruff et al (2008,
098386)
Period of Study: 1999-2002
Location: US counties with >250,000
residents (96 counties)
Outcome: Postneonatal deaths
Respiratory mortality (ICD10: J000-99,
plus bronchopulmonary dysplasia [BPD]
P27.1)
SIDS (ICD10: R95)
Ill-defined causes (R99);
All other deaths evaluated as a control
category
Age Groups: Infants aged > 28 days
and <1 yr
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 3,583,495 births (6,639 post neonatal
deaths)
Statistical Analyses: Logistic GEE
(exchangeable correlation structure)
Covariates: maternal race/ethnicity,
marital status, age, education,
primiparity, county-level poverty and per
capita income levels, year and month of
birth dummy variables to account for time
trend and seasonal effects, and region of
the country
sensitivity analyses performed among
only those mothers with smoking
information (adjustment for smoking had
no effect on the estimates)
Season: Adjusted for year and month of
birth dummy variables to account for time
trend and seasonal effects
Dose-response Investigated? Evaluated
the appropriateness of a linear form from
analysis based on quartiles of exposure
and concluded that linear form was
appropriate (data not shown)
Statistical Package: SAS
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: Measured continuously
for 24 h once every 6 days
exposure assigned by calculating avg
concentration of pollutant during first 2
months of life
Median and IQR (25th-75th
percentile): Survivors: 28.9 (23.3-34.4)
All causes of death: 29.1 (23.9-34.5)
Respiratory: 29.8 (24.3-36.5)
SIDS: 28.6 (23.5-33.8)
SIDS + ill-defined: 28.8 (23.9-33.9)
Other causes: 29.2 (23.9-34.5)
Percentiles: see above
PM Component: Not assessed, but
controlled for region of the country to
account for PM composition variation
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant (correlation): PMio
PM2.6 (r - 0.34)
CO (r - 0.18)
SO2 (r - 0.00)
O3 (r - 0.20)
Notes: Monthly averages calculated if
there were at least 3 available measures
for PM
Assigned exposures using the avg
concentration of the county of residence
PM Increment: IQR (11 /yglm3)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Adjusted ORs for single pollutant models
All causes: 1.04 (0.99,1.10)
Respiratory: 1.18 (1.06,1.31)
SIDS: 1.02(0.89,1.16)
Ill-defined + SIDS: 1.06 (0.97,1.16)
Other causes: 1.02 (0.96,1.07)
Adjusted ORs for multipollutant models
(including CO, O3, SO2)
Respiratory: 1.16 (1.04,1.30)
SIDS: 1.02(0.90,1.16)
OR for deaths coded as BPD per increase
in IQR: 1.19 (0.85,1.65)
OR for respiratory post neonatal death
stratified by birth weight
NBW only: 1.19(1.05,1.36)
LBW only: 1.12(0.95,1.31)
OR for respiratory deaths removing region
of US as a confounding variable: 1.30
(1.04,1.61)
OR for respiratory deaths assessing
exposure as quartiles
Highest vs Lowest quartile: 1.31 (1.00,
1.71)
OR for respiratory deaths among only
those deaths that occurred during the
first 90 days (most closely matched
exposure metric of the avg over the first
2 months of life):
1.25(1.06,1.47)
Reference: (Suh et al., 2007,157028)
Period of Study: 2001-2004
Location: Seoul, Korea
Outcome: Birth weight
Age Groups: prenatal follow-up for
newborns
Study Design: based prospective cohort
study
N: 199 pregnant mothers
Statistical Analyses: ANCOVA,
generalized linear models
Covariates: infant's sex, maternal age,
maternal and paternal education, parity,
presence of illness during pregnancy,
delivery month, gestational age (squared)
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: SAS
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24-h
Mean (SD): 1st trimester: 76.41 (28.80)
2nd trimester: 77.84 (31.63)
3rd trimester: 95.61 (26.15)
Percentiles: 1st trimester
25th: 55.28
50th(Median): 71.09
75th: 92.38
2nd trimester
25th: 48.65
50th(Median): 72.36
75th: 108.00
3rd trimester
25th: 77.10
50th(Median): 96.35
75th: 116.68
Range (Min, Max):
1st trimester (21.00,151.65)
PM Increment: Trimester a 90th%ile
compared to < 90th%ile
Least-square (ANCOVA) mean (SE)
All Genotypes
1st trimester
< 90th%ile, N(%): 158 (90.3%): 3253
(37)
> 90th%ile, N(%): 17 (9.7%): 2841 (145)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PMio vs. for < 90th%ile PMio
Adjusted: 0.009
Adjusted, with CO: 0.041
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.092
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.012
2nd trimester
<90th%ile, N(%): 153 (89.5%): 3253
(39)
>90th%ile, N(%): 18(10.5%): 3026
(157)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PMio vs. for < 90th%ile PMio
July 2009
E-604
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
2nd trimester (31.45,139.13)
3rd trimester (23.45,172.75)
Monitoring Stations: 27
Copollutant:
CO
SO?
NO?
Adjusted: 0.177
Adjusted, with CO: 0.203
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.151
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.151
3rd trimester
< 90th%ile, N(%): 162 (90.5%): 3226
(38)
> 90th%ile, N(%): 17 (9.5%): 3122 (140)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PM10 vs. for < 90th%ile PM10
Adjusted: 0.487
Adjusted, with CO: 0.748
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.420
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.466
Genotype Mspl TT
1st trimester
<90th%ile,N(%): 60 (34.3%): 3350
(64)
> 90th%ile, N(%): 5 (2.9%): 3001 (229)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PM10 vs. for < 90th%ile PM10
Adjusted: 0.147
Adjusted, with CO: 0.186
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.430
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.155
2nd trimester
<90th%ile,N(%): 59 (34.5%): 3335
(66)
> 90th%ile, N(%): 6 (3.5%): 3281 (249)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PM10 vs. for < 90th%ile PM10
Adjusted: 0.833
Adjusted, with CO: 0.833
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.778
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.806
3rd trimester
< 90th%ile, N(%): 61 (34.1%): 3327
(65)
> 90th%ile, N(%): 6 (3.4%): 3227 (300)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PM10 vs. for < 90th%ile PM10
Adjusted: 0.749
Adjusted, with CO: 0.980
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.635
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.687
Genotype Mspl TC/CC
1st trimester
<90th%ile,N(%): 98 (56.0%): 3193
(48)
July 2009
E-605
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
> 90th%ile, N(%): 12 (6.9%): 2799 (169)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PMio vs. for < 90th%ile PMio
Adjusted: 0.033
Adjusted, with CO: 0.073
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.150
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.036
2nd trimester
< 90th%ile, N(%): 94 (55.0%): 3200
(52)
> 90th%ile, N(%): 12 (7.0%): 2933 (176)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PMio vs. for < 90th%ile PMio
Adjusted: 0.161
Adjusted, with CO: 0.172
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.152
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.158
3rd trimester
<90th%ile, N(%): 101 (56.4%): 3165
(49)
>90th%ile, N(%): 11 (6.2%): 3087 (147)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PMio vs. for < 90th%ile PMio
Adjusted: 0.626
Adjusted, with CO: 0.978
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.551
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.614
Genotype Ncol llelle
1st trimester
<90th%ile,N(%): 87 (49.7%): 3244
(52)
> 90th%ile, N(%): 7 (4.0%): 2983 (232)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PMio vs. for < 90th%ile PMio
Adjusted: 0.289
Adjusted, with CO: 0.344
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.641
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.293
2nd trimester
<90th%ile,N(%): 82 (48.0%): 3243
(55)
> 90th%ile, N(%): 11 (6.4%): 3185 (207)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PMio vs. for < 90th%ile PMio
Adjusted: 0.790
Adjusted, with CO: 0.783
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.707
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.733
3rd trimester
July 2009
E-606
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
<90th%ile, N(%): 90 (50.3%): 3239
(53)
> 90th%ile, N(%): 9 (5.0%): 2944 (198)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PMio vs. for < 90th%ile PMio
Adjusted: 0.161
Adjusted, with CO: 0.279
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.134
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.150
Genotype Ncol MeVal/ValVal
1st trimester
< 90th%ile, N(%): 71 (40.6%): 3262
(56)
>90th%ile, N(%): 10(5.7%): 2773 (171)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PMio vs. for < 90th%ile PMio
Adjusted: 0.009
Adjusted, with CO: 0.031
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.058
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.010
2nd trimester
< 90th%ile, N(%): 71 (41.5%): 3264
(61)
> 90th%ile, l\l(%): 7 (4.1%): 2862 (208)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PMio vs. for < 90th%ile PMio
Adjusted: 0.076
Adjusted, with CO: 0.093
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.063
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.061
3rd trimester
<90th%ile,N(%): 72 (40.2%): 3207
(58)
> 90th%ile, l\l(%): 8 (4.5%): 3262 (180)
p-Value for mean birth weight for a
90th%ile PMio vs. for < 90th%ile PMio
Adjusted: 0.777
Adjusted, with CO: 0.607
Adjusted, with NO2: 0.843
Adjusted, with SO2: 0.791
July 2009
E-607
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Tsai et al. (2006, 098312)
Period of Study: 1994-2000
Location: Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Outcome: post neonatal mortality
Age Groups: infants more than 27 days
and less than 1 year
Study Design: Case-crossover study
N: 207 deaths
Statistical Analyses: Conditional
logistic regression
Covariates: temperature, humidity
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS, version 8.2
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 81.45 //g/m3
Percentiles: 25th: 44.50
50th(Median): 79.20
75th: 111.50
Range (Min, Max): (20.50-232.00)
Monitoring Stations: 6
Copollutant: SO2
NO?
CO
0s
PM Increment: 67.00 //g/m3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
OR - 1.040(0.340-3.177)
Note: Air pollution levels at the dates of
infant death were compared with air
pollution levels 1 week before and 1
week after death
a cumulative lag up to 2 previous days
was used to assign exposure.
Reference: (Wilhelm and Ritz, 2005,
188761)
Period of Study: 1994-2000
Location: Los Angeles County, California,
U.S.
Outcome: Term low birth weight (LBW)
(< 2500 g at a 37 completed weeks
gestation), Vaginal birth <37 completed
weeks gestation
Age Groups: LBW: a 37 com|
weeks
Preterm births: < 37 completed weeks
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: For LBW: 136,134
For preterm birth:
106,483
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression
Covariates: Maternal age, maternal race,
maternal education, parity, interval since
previous live birth, level of prenatal care,
infant sex, previous LBW or preterm
infant, birth season, other pollutants (CO,
NO2, 0 i, PM in), gestational age (in birth
weight analysis)
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: NR
Pollutant: PM10
Averaging Time:
24 hr (every 6 days)
Entire pregnancy
Trimesters of pregnancy
Months of pregnancy
6 weeks before birth
Mean (SD): First trimester: 42.2
Third trimester: 41.5
6 weeks before birth: 39.1
Range (Min, Max):
First trimester: 26.3, 77.4
Third trimester: 25.7, 74.6
6 weeks before birth: 13.0,103.7
Monitoring Stations:
Zip-code-level analysis: 8
Address-level analysis: 6
Copollutant (correlation):
First trimester: PM10 CO: r - 0.12
PMio-NO?: r - 0.29
PMio-03: r - -0.01
PMio-PM2.b: r - 0.43
Third trimester: PM10 CO: r - 0.32
PMio-NO?: r - 0.45
PMio-03: r - -0.08
PMio-PM2.b: r - 0.52
6 weeks before birth: PMio-CO: r -
0.36
PMio-NO?: r - 0.49
PMio-03: r - -0.16
PMio-PM2.b: r - 0.60
PM Increment: 1) 10 //g/m3
2) 3 levels:
a) < 25%ile (reference)
b) 25%-75%ile
c) > 75%ile
Incidence of LBW (third trimester
exposure)
< 32.8//g/m3: 2.0(1.8, 2.2)
32.8 to < 43.4//g/m3: 2.0 (1.9, 2.1)
a 43.4//g/m3: 2.2(2.0, 2.4)
Incidence of preterm birth (first
trimester exposure)
< 32.9//g/m3: 8.7 (8.3, 9.2)
32.9 to < 43.9//g/m3: 8.8 (8.5, 9.1)
>43.9//g/m3: 8.6(8.1,9.0)
Incidence of preterm birth (6 weeks
before birth exposure)
< 31.8//g/m3: 8.8(8.4,9.3)
31.8 to <44.1 //g/m3: 8.6 (8.3, 8.9)
> 44.1 //g/m3: 8.8 (8.4, 9.2)
Outcome: LBW
Exposure Period: Third trimester
Address-level analysis:
Single-pollutant model:
Distance ~ 1 mile
Per 10 //g/m3:1.22 (1.05,1.41)
33.4 to < 44.7 //g/m3:1.08 (0.76, 1.52)
>44.7//g/m3: 1.48 (1.00,2.19)
Multipollutant model:
Distance ~ 1 mile
Per 10 //g/m3:1.36 (1.12, 1.65)
33.4 to <44.7 //g/m3:1.16 (0.77, 1.74)
>44.7//g/m3: 1.58 (0.95, 2.62)
Single-pollutant model:
July 2009
E-608
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
1 < distance ~ 2 mile
Per 10 //g/m3: 0.98 (0.90, 1.06)
33.4 to < 44.7 //g/m3: 0.95 (0.80, 1.13)
>44.7//g/m3: 0.96 (0.78, 1.18)
Multipollutant model:
1 < distance ~ 2 mile
Per 10 //g/m3:1.02 (0.92,1.14)
33.4 to < 44.7 //g/m3: 0.93 (0.77, 1.12)
>44.7//g/m3: 1.02 (0.79, 1.32)
Single-pollutant model:
2 < distance ~ 4 mile
Per 10 //g/m3:1.03 (0.99, 1.08)
33.9 to < 45.0//g/m3:1.04 (0.96,1.14)
>45.0 //g/m3: 1.08 (0.97, 1.20)
Multipollutant model:
2 < distance ~ 4 mile
Per 10 //g/m3:1.04 (0.98,1.09)
33.9 to <45.0//g/m3:1.02 (0.92, 1.12)
>45.0 //g/m3: 1.06 (0.93, 1.21)
Zip-code-level analysis
Single-pollutant model:
Per 10//g/m3:1.03 (0.97, 1.09)
33.2 to <43.6//g/m3: 0.98 (0.86, 1.1 1)
>43.6//g/m3: 1.03 (0.88, 1.21)
Multipollutant model:
Per 10 //g/m3:1.07 (0.99, 1.15)
33.2 to < 43.6//g/m3: 0.97 (0.85, 1.12)
>43.6//g/m3: 1.09 (0.90, 1.31)
Outcome: LBW
Exposure Period: Entire pregnancy
period
Address-level analysis:
Multipollutant model:
Per 10 //g/m3:1.24 (0.91, 1.70)
Outcome: Preterm Birth
Exposure Period: First trimester of
pregnancy
Address-level analysis:
Single-pollutant model:
Distance ~ 1 mile
Per 10//g/m3:1.00 (0.93, 1.09)
33.3 to <45.1 //g/m3:1.07 (0.90, 1.26)
>45.1 //g/m3: 1.12(0.91,1.38)
Multipollutant model:
Distance ~ 1 mile
Per 10//g/m3:1.00 (0.90, 1.12)
July 2009
E-609
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
33.3 to <45.1 //g/m3:1.12 (0.92, 1.36)
> 45.1 //g/m3: 1.17 (0.90, 1.50)
Single-pollutant model:
1 < distance ~ 2 mile
Per 10 //g/m3:1.01 (0.97, 1.05)
33.7 to < 45.3//g/m3:1.03 (0.95, 1.12)
> 45.3 //g/m3: 1.07 (0.97, 1.19)
Multipollutant model:
1 < distance ~ 2 mile
Per 10 //g/m3:1.04 (0.99,1.10)
33.7 to <45.3//g/m3:1.07 (0.98, 1.17)
>45.3//g/m3: 1.13 (1.00, 1.27)
Single-pollutant model:
2 < distance ~ 4 mile
Per 10 //g/m3:1.01 (0.99, 1.03)
34.1 to <45.5//g/m3:1.03 (0.99, 1.08)
a 45.5 //g/m3: 1.02 (0.96, 1.07)
Multipollutant model:
2 < distance ~ 4 mile
Per 10 //g/m3: 0.99 (0.97, 1.02)
34.1 to <45.5//g/m3: 0.99 (0.95,1.04)
>45.5//g/m3: 0.94 (0.89,1.01)
Zip-code-level analysis
Single-pollutant model:
Per 10 //g/m3: 0.99 (0.96, 1.01)
33.3 to <44.2//g/m3:1.01 (0.95, 1.08)
>44.2//g/m3: 0.98 (0.90, 1.05)
Multipollutant model:
Per 10 //g/m3: 0.99 (0.96, 1.03)
33.3 to <44.2//g/m3:1.03 (0.97, 1.1 1)
>44.2//g/m3: 1.01 (0.92,1.11)
Outcome: Preterm birth
Exposure Period: 6 weeks before birth
Address-level analysis:
Single-pollutant model:
Distance ~ 1 mile
Per 10 //g/m3:1.02 (0.95, 1.10)
32.5 to < 44.8//g/m3:1.09 (0.92, 1.29)
a 44.8 //g/m3: 1.12 (0.92, 1.37)
Multipollutant model:
Distance ~ 1 mile
Per 10 //g/m3:1.06 (0.97, 1.16)
32.5 to <44.8//g/m3:1.09 (0.90, 1.31)
>44.8//g/m3: 1.17 (0.91,1.49)
Single-pollutant model:
July 2009
E-610
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
1 < distance ~ 2 mile
Per 10 //g/m3:1.00 (0.96, 1.03)
32.3 to < 45.3//g/m3: 0.99 (0.91, 1.07)
>45.3//g/m3: 0.99 (0.89, 1.10)
Multipollutant model:
1 < distance ~ 2 mile
Per 10 //g/m3:1.01 (0.97, 1.06)
32.3 to < 45.3//g/m3:1.00 (0.92, 1.10)
>45.3 //g/m3: 1.02 (0.91,1.16)
Single-pollutant model:
2 < distance ~ 4 mile
Per 10//g/m3: 0.99 (0.98, 1.01)
33.1 to <45.3//g/m3:1.00 (0.96, 1.05)
>45.3//g/m3: 0.98 (0.93, 1.03)
Multipollutant model:
2 < distance ~ 4 mile
Per 10//g/m3:1.00 (0.98, 1.02)
33.1 to <45.3//g/m3:1.01 (0.96, 1.05)
>45.3//g/m3: 0.98 (0.92,1.04)
Zip-code-level analysis
Single-pollutant model:
Per 10//g/m3:1.02(0.99,1.04)
32.1 to <44.3//g/m3:1.01 (0.95, 1.07)
>44.3//g/m3: 1.04 (0.96,1.12)
Multipollutant model:
Per 10 //g/m3:1.02 (0.99, 1.06)
32.1 to <44.3//g/m3:1.02 (0.95, 1.09)
a 44.3 //g/m3: 1.04 (0.95,1.14)
Notes: multipollutant model adds
C0,N02, and 03 in addition to the main
pollutant of interest, PM10.
July 2009
E-611
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Woodruff et al. (1997,
084271)
Period of Study: 1989-1991
Location: 86 Metropolitan Statistical
Areas in the US (counties with
populations less than 100,000 were
excluded)
Outcome: Postneonatal mortality (death
of an infant between 1 month and 1 yr of
age)
1) all post neonatal deaths
2) normal birth weight (NBW, a 2500 g)
SIDS deaths
3) NBW respiratory deaths
4) low birth weight (LBW) respiratory
death
Respiratory deaths: ICD9 codes 460-519
SIDS: ICD9 code 798.0
Age Groups: infants (1 month-1yr of
age)
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 3,788,079 infants
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression
Covariates: maternal education,
maternal race, parental marital status,
maternal smoking during pregnancy
avg temperature during the first 2 months
of life
infant's month and year of birth
assessed race as an effect modifier (p-val
for interaction terms > 0.2)
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: NR
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: Mean of 1st 2 months
of life
analyzed as tertiles of exposure and as
continuous exposure
Mean (SD): 31.4 (7.8)
Range (Min, Max):
Overall: 11.9-68.8
Low category: < 28.0
Medium category: 28.1-40.0
High category: >40.0
Monitoring Stations: NR
PM Increment: 10 //gf'nv1 (for continuous
exposure analysis)
Adjusted ORs for cause-specific post
neonatal mortality by pollution
category (tertiles)
All causes
Low: Ref
Medium: 1.05 (1.01,1.09)
High: 1.10(1.04,1.16)
SIDS, NBW:
Low: Ref
Medium: 1.09 (1.01,1.17)
High: 1.26(1.14,1.39)
Respiratory death, NBW:
Low: Ref
Medium: 1.08 (0.87,1.33)
High: 1.40(1.05,1.85)
Respiratory death, LBW:
Low: Ref
Medium: 0.93 (0.73,1.18)
High: 1.18(0.86,1.61)
All other causes:
Low: Ref
Medium: 1.03 (0.97,1.08)
High: 0.97(0.90,1.04)
Adjusted ORs for a continuous
10//g/m3change in exposure
All causes: 1.04 (1.02,1.07)
SIDS, NBW: 1.12 (1.07,1.17)
Respiratory death, NBW: 1.20 (1.06,
1.36)
Respiratory death, LBW: 1.05 (0.91,
1.22)
All other causes: 1.00 (0.99,1.00)
July 2009
E-612
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Woodruff et al (2008,
098386)
Period of Study: 1999-2002
Location: US counties with >250,000
residents (96 counties)
Outcome: Postneonatal deaths
Respiratory mortality (ICD10: J000-99,
plus bronchopulmonary dysplasia [BPD]
P27.1)
SIDS (ICD10: R95)
Ill-defined causes (R99);
All other deaths evaluated as a control
category
Age Groups: Infants aged > 28 days
and <1 yr
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 3,583,495 births (6,639 post neonatal
deaths)
Statistical Analyses: Logistic GEE
(exchangeable correlation structure)
Covariates: maternal race/ethnicity,
marital status, age, education,
primiparity, county-level poverty and per
capita income levels, year and month of
birth dummy variables to account for time
trend and seasonal effects, and region of
the country
sensitivity analyses performed among
only those mothers with smoking
information (adjustment for smoking had
no effect on the estimates)
Season: Adjusted for year and month of
birth dummy variables to account for time
trend and seasonal effects
Dose-response Investigated? Evaluated
the appropriateness of a linear form from
analysis based on quartiles of exposure
and concluded that linear form was
appropriate (data not shown)
Statistical Package: SAS
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: Measured continuously
for 24 h once every 6 days
exposure assigned by calculating avg
concentration of pollutant during first 2
months of life
Median and IQR (25th-75th
percentile): Survivors: 28.9 (23.3-34.4)
All causes of death: 29.1 (23.9-34.5)
Respiratory: 29.8 (24.3-36.5)
SIDS: 28.6 (23.5-33.8)
SIDS + ill-defined: 28.8 (23.9-33.9)
Other causes: 29.2 (23.9-34.5)
Percentiles: see above
PM Component: Not assessed, but
controlled for region of the country to
account for PM composition variation
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant (correlation): PMio
PM2.6 (r - 0.34)
CO (r - 0.18)
SO2 (r - 0.00)
O3 (r - 0.20)
Notes: Monthly averages calculated if
there were at least 3 available measures
for PM
Assigned exposures using the avg
concentration of the county of residence
PM Increment: IQR (11 /yglm3)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Adjusted ORs for single pollutant models
All causes: 1.04 (0.99,1.10)
Respiratory: 1.18 (1.06,1.31)
SIDS: 1.02(0.89,1.16)
Ill-defined + SIDS: 1.06 (0.97,1.16)
Other causes: 1.02 (0.96,1.07)
Adjusted ORs for multipollutant models
(including CO, O3, SO2)
Respiratory: 1.16 (1.04,1.30)
SIDS: 1.02(0.90,1.16)
OR for deaths coded as BPD per increase
in IQR: 1.19 (0.85,1.65)
OR for respiratory post neonatal death
stratified by birth weight
NBW only: 1.19(1.05,1.36)
LBW only: 1.12(0.95,1.31)
OR for respiratory deaths removing region
of US as a confounding variable: 1.30
(1.04,1.61)
OR for respiratory deaths assessing
exposure as quartiles
Highest vs Lowest quartile: 1.31 (1.00,
1.71)
OR for respiratory deaths among only
those deaths that occurred during the
first 90 days (most closely matched
exposure metric of the avg over the first
2 months of life):
1.25(1.06,1.47)
July 2009
E-613
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Jedrychowski, et al„ (2007,
156607)
Period of Study: Jan 2001-Feb 2004
Location: Krakow, Poland
Outcome: Birth weight (grams), birth
length (cm)
Age Groups: pregnant women 18-35
years
Study Design: Prospective cohort
N:493 women
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression
Covariates: Environmental tobacco
smoke (# cigarettes smoked daily in
presence of pregnant woman), season of
birth, size of mother, parity, gestational
age, gender of child, vitamin A intake
Season: All
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: Two consecutive days
in the second trimester
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 48 h period
Percentiles: 50th(Median): 35.3
Range (Min, Max): 10.3, 294.9
Monitoring Stations: No stations,
personal monitoring
Notes: PM measured during a two day
period in the second trimester by Personal
Environmental Monitoring Sampler
(PEMS)
PM Increment: in 1 //gf'nr1 and tertiles
T1: < 27.0 /yglm3
T2: 27.0-46.2 //g/m3
T3: > 46.2/ygfm3
Mean [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Birth weight (g)
For In unit PM: p - -172.39 (p - 0.02)
Tertiles:
T1: ref
T2: p - -16.510 [-94.630, 61.610]
T3: p - -109.956 [-196.649 to-23.263]
In low Vitamin A group (< 1,378/yg)
T1: ref
T2: p - -68.354 [-165.643, 28.935]
T3: p - -185.070 [-293.393 to-76.747]
In high Vitamin A group (> 1,378/yg)
T1: ref
T2: p - 64.262 [-70.464,198.988]
T3: p - 38.593[-109.853,187.039]
Birth length (cm)
For In unit PM: p — -1.39 (p — 0.00)
Tertiles:
T1: ref
T2: p - -0.288 [-0.790, 0.214]
T3: p - -0.810 [-1.367 to -0.253]
In low Vitamin A group (< 1,378/yg)
T1: ref
T2: p - -0.514 [-1.114, 0.086]
T3: p - -1.100 [-1.768 to-0.432]
In high Vitamin A group (> 1,378/yg)
T1: ref
T2: p - 0.039 [-0.896, 0.974]
T3: p - -0.301 [-1.326, 0.724]
July 2009
E-614
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: (Lipfert et al„ 2000,
004103)
Period of Study: 1990
Location: U.S.
Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10): Infant
mortality
including respiratory mortality (traditional
definition, ICD9 460-519), expanded
definition (adds ICD9 769 and 770)
Age Groups: Infants
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 2,413,762 infants in 180 counties (Ns
differ for various models)
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression
Covariates: mother's smoking,
education, marital status, and race
month of birth
and county avg heating degree days
Dose-response Investigated? NR
Statistical Package: NR
Pollutant: SO421 NSPM10 (regressed
jointly)
Averaging Time: Yearly avg used
Mean (SD): 33.1 (9.17) (based on 180
counties)
Range (Min, Max): (16.9, 59)
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant:
PM10
NSPM10
CO
SO?
Notes: TSP-based sulfate was adjusted
for compatibility with the PMio-based
data
July 2009
E-615
PM Increment: NR (present regression
coefficients)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Presented regression coefficients
(standard errors)
(3 PM exposures regressed jointly)
bold - p < 0.05
Cause of death: All
Birth weight: All
SO42 :-0.0002 (0.0061)
NSPM10: 0.0115(0.0014)
Cause of death: All
Birth weight: LBW
SO42-: 0.0265 (0.0080)
NSPM10: 0.0086 (0.0020)
Cause of death: All
Birth weight: normal
SO42-: -0.0488 (0.0098)
NSPM10: 0.0096 (0.0024)
Cause of death: All neonatal
Birth weight: All
SO42-: 0.0267 (0.0076)
NSPM10: 0.0126 (0.0018)
Cause of death: All neonatal
Birth weight: LBW
SO42-: 0.0388 (0.0088)
NSPM10: 0.0093 (0.0022)
Cause of death: All neonatal
Birth wt: normal
SO42 :-0.0334 (0.0169)
NSPM10: 0.0125 (0.0040)
Cause of death: All post neonatal
Birth wt: All
PM10: 0.0091 (0.0024)
SO42 :-0.0474 (0.0100)
NSPM10: 0.0096 (0.0024)
Cause of death: All post neonatal
Birth wt: LBW
SO42 :-0.0247 (0.0173)
NSPM10: 0.0101 (0.0042)
Cause of death: All post neonatal
Birth wt: normal
SO42 :-0.0569 (0.0121)
NSPM10: 0.0080 (0.0029)
Cause of death: SIDS
Birth weight: All
SO42 :-0.1078 (0.0151)
NSPM10: 0.0149 (0.0037)
CapiAFTleatBtfNpgT CITE OR QUOTE
Birth weight: LBW
SO42 :-0.1378 (0.0337)
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: (Liu et al„ 2007, 090429)
Period of Study: 1985-2000
Location: 3 Canadian cities: Calgary,
Edmonton, and Montreal
Outcome: intrauterine growth restriction
(IUGR)
Age Groups: singleton term live births
(37-42 wks gestation)
Study Design: retrospective cohort
N: 386,202 singleton live births
Statistical Analyses: Multiple logistic
regression
Covariates: maternal age, parity, infant
gender, season, and city of residence at
time period of birth
Season: All seasons
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: NR
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h (6-day schedule)
Mean (SD): 12.2
Percentiles: 25th: 6.3
50th(Median): 9.7
75th: 15
PM Component: metals and organic
matter such as polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons
Monitoring Stations: Calgary (4),
Edmonton (2), and Montreal (8)
Copollutant (correlation): SO2:
r- 0.44, p< 0.0001
NO?: r - 0.41, p< 0.0001
CO: r - 0.31, p< 0.0001
0s: r - -0.14, p< 0.0001
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3
Effect Estimate
single-pollutant model [Lower CI,
Upper CI]:
1st trimester
OR - 1.07(1.03-1.10)
2nd trimester
OR - 1.06 (1.03-1.10)
3,d trimester
OR - 1.06(1.03-1.10)
Effect Estimate
multi-pollutant model [Lower CI,
Upper CI]:
1st trimester
OR- 1.03 (0.99-1.06)
2nd trimester
OR- 1.01 (0.98-1.05)
3,d trimester
OR- 1.03 (0.99-1.06)
Note: ORs and CIs estimated from Figs. 6
and 7
July 2009
E-616
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Loomis et al. (1999, 087288)
Period of Study: Jan 1,1993-Jul
31,1995
Location: Mexico City (southwestern
section)
Study Design: Time-series
N: 942 deaths (days were the unit of
observation)
Statistical Analyses: Poisson regression
(generalized additive model)
Covariates: Final models controlled for
mean temp of 3 days before death and
nonparametrically smoothed periodic
cycles
Season: Yes (considered)
Dose-response Investigated? Loess
smoother
Statistical Package: NR
Lags Considered: 0-5 (also considered
lags with avg exposure levels during
"windows" of 2 to 4 days)
Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10): Infant
mortality (daily counts of deaths)
All ICD9 codes, excluding accidents,
poisoning, and violence (ICD9 £800)
Age Groups: Children < 1 yr of age
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-h
Mean (SD): 27.4 (10.5)
Percentiles: Lower quartile: 20
Median: 26
Upper quartile: 34
Range (Min, Max): 4, 85
Monitoring Stations: one
Copollutant: 0:i
NO?
NO
NOx
SO?
Notes: Pearson correlation coefficients
ranging from 0.52 to 0.71
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
%Change in infant mortality
Lags 0-5 (single day) presented in Figure
1:
Lag0,1,2: No association (results not
presented)
Lag3: 4.8 (0.97, 8.61)
Lag4: 4.2 (0.37, 7.93)
%Change in mortality when avg exposure
levels during "windows" of 2 to 4 days
were considered
Two Days:
No lag: -1.36 (-5.51, 2.8)
Lag1: -0.95 (-5.10, 3.20)
Lag2: 2.78 (-1.33, 6.89)
Lag3: 4.93 (0.86, 9.01)
Three Days:
No lag: -0.81 (-5.29, 3.67)
Lag1: 1.99 (-2.46, 6.45)
Lag2: 4.54 (0.12, 8.96)
Lag3: 6.87(2.48,11.26)
Four Days:
No lag: 1.95 (-2.76, 6.66)
Lag1: 3.74 (-0.95,8.42)
Lag2: 5.87(1.21,10.53)
Multipollutant models (3-day mean wf 3-
day lag)
1 pollutant model:
6.87(2.48,11.26)
2 pollutant models:
wI 03:6.24(1.35,11.14)
wI NO?: 5.91 (-0.76,12.59)
3 pollutant model (wf O3 and NO2): 6.30
(-0.54,13.15)
July 2009
E-617
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Mannes et al. (2005,
087895)
Period of Study: January 1,1998-
December 31, 2000
Location: metropolitan Sydney, Australia
Outcome: risk of small for gestational
age (SGA) and birth weight
Age Groups: all singleton births > 20
weeks and a 400 grams birth weight and
maternal all ages
Study Design: cross-sectional
N: 138,056 singleton births
Statistical Analyses: Logistic and linear
regression models
Covariates: sex of child, maternal age,
gestational age, maternal smoking,
gestational age at first antenatal visit,
maternal indigenous status, whether first
pregnancy, season of birth, and
socioeconomic status (SES)
Season: All seasons
included as covariate.
Dose-response Investigated? No
Statistical Package: SAS System for
Windows v8.02
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 h
Mean (SD): 9.4 (5.1)
Percentiles: 25th: 6.5
50th(Median): 8.4
75th: 11.2
Range (Min, Max): (2.4- 82.1)
Monitoring Stations: up to 14
Copollutant (correlation):
CO: r - 0.53
NO?: r - 0.66
O3: r = 0.36
PM10: r - 0.81
PM Increment: 1 /yglm3
Risk of SGA
All births
One month before birth: OR - 1.01
(0.99-1.03)
Third trimester: OR - 0.99(0.97-1.02)
Second trimester: OR - 1.03 (1.01-1.05)
First trimester: OR - 0.99 (0.97-1.01)
5 km births
One month before birth: OR - 1.01
(0.97-1.04)
Third trimester: OR - 1.00(0.95-1.05)
Second trimester: OR - 1.00 (0.96-1.05)
First trimester: OR - 0.99 (0.94-1.04)
Change in birth weight
All births
One month before birth: B - -2.48 (-4.58-
¦0.38)
Third trimester: B - -0.98 (-3.74—1.78)
Second trimester: B - -4.10 (-6.79- ¦
1.41)
First trimester: B - 0.36 (-2.29- 3.01)
5 km births
One month before birth: B - -2.70 (-6.80-
1.40)
Third trimester: B - -2.83 (-9.00-3.34)
Second trimester: B - 1.54 (-4.59-7.67)
First trimester: B - 1.89 (-1.99-5.77)
July 2009
E-618
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Parker et al. (2005, 087462) Outcome: small for gestational age (SGA) Pollutant: PM2
and birth weight
Period of Study: 1999-2000
Location: California
Age Groups: infants delivered at 40
weeks gestation
maternal all ages
Study Design: cross-sectional
N: 18,247 singleton births
Statistical Analyses: Linear and logistic
regression models
Covariates: maternal race, maternal
Hispanic origin, marital status, parity,
maternal education, and maternal age
Season: season of delivery (covariate)
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: STATA
Averaging Time: NR (measurement
taken every 6 days)
Mean (SD): 15.42 (5.08)
PM Component: metals, polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons
Monitoring Stations: 40
Copollutant (correlation):
PM2.B-CO: r - 0.6
Notes: Mean calculated for 9-month
exposure. The following means (SDs) are
calculated for trimester:
First: 15.70(6.26)
Second: 15.40 (6.53)
Third: 14.29 (6.35)
PM categorized into quartiles:
Q1: <11.9
Q2: 11.9-13.9
Q3: 13.9-18.4
Q4: >18.4
PM Increment: < 11.9 /yg/m3
Referent PM Increment: 11.9-
13.9/yg/m3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
First Trimester
Birth weight: B - -5.7 (-27.9-16.5)
SGA: OR - 1.02 (0.84-1.23)
Second Trimester
Birth weight: B - 11.3 (-12.2-34.9)
SGA: OR - 0.89 (0.73-1.09)
Third Trimester
Birth weight: B - 8.3 (-13.1-29.8)
SGA: OR - 1.00 (0.83-1.19)
PM Increment: 13.9-18.4 //g|m3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
First Trimester
Birth weight: B - -2.5 (-24.5-19.5)
SGA: OR - 1.12(0.93-1.34)
Second Trimester
Birth weight: B - -17.2 (-39.4-4.9)
SGA: OR - 1.05 (0.88-1.26)
Third Trimester
Birth weight: B - -8.1 (-30.2-13.9)
SGA: OR - 0.98 (0.82-1.18)
PM Increment: > 18.4//g/m3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
First Trimester
Birth weight: B - -35.8 (-58.4-13.3)
SGA: OR - 1.26 (1.04-1.51)
Second Trimester
Birth weight: B - -46.6 (-68.6- -24.6)
SGA: OR - 1.24(1.04-1.49)
Third Trimester
Birth weight: B - -31.6 (-52.0- -11.1)
SGA: OR - 1.21 (1.02-1.43)
July 2009
E-619
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: (Parker and Woodruff, 2008, Outcome: Low birth weight
189095)
Period of Study: 2001-2003
Location: US
Study Design: cohort
N: 785,965 Singleton births delivered at
40 weeks gestation
Statistical Analyses: GEE regression
models
linear and logistic regression
Covariates: race/ethnicity, parity,
maternal age
Season: season of delivery
Statistical Package: SUDAAN
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 9-months
Mean (SD): 14.5
25th: 12.1
75th: 17.6
Copollutant (correlation): SO2, NO2 CO
0s
PM Increment: 10 /yglm3
Change in Birth weight (9 month
exposure): Unadjusted: 19.4 (9.8, 29.0)
Adjusted for maternal factors: 18.4 (9.2,
27.7)
Stratified by region: Industrial
Midwest:-15.3 (-43.4,12.9)
Northeast: -9.8 (-11.9, 26.6)
Northwest: 27.5 (5.5, 49.4)
Southern CA: 5.5 (-9.6, 20.5)
Southeast: 7.3 (-11.9, 26.6)
Southwest: 72.3 (34.0,110.5)
Upper Midwest: -0.7 (-62.0, 60.6)
Multipollutant models: PM2.6 +PM10
2.5:14.2(4.3, 24.1)
PM2.6 +PMio-2.5+S02+CO+N02+03:
28.6(14.2, 43.0)
Reference: Rich et al. (2009,180122)
Period of Study: 1999-2003
Location: New Jersey, United States
Outcome: Small for gestational age
Study Design: Retrospective Cohort
Covariates: month and calendar year of
birth, apparent temperature, pregnancy
complications
Statistical Analysis: Polytomous
logistic regression
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24h
Mean (SD) Unit:
"All values are for first trimester, other
trimesters are available in paper
Reference Births: 13.8 (2.5)
SGA Births: 13.9(2.5)
Statistical Package: SAS
Age Groups: Gestational age 37-42 wks VSGA Births: 13.9 (2.4)
Range (Min, Max): 2.0, 29.0
Copollutant (correlation):
"All values are for first trimester, other
trimesters are available in paper
NO2: 0.01
SO2: 0.17
CO: 0.25
"All values are for first trimester, other
trimesters are available in paper
Increment: 4/yg/m3
Percent Change in Risk (95% CI)
SGA: 4.5 (0.5-8.7)
VSGA: 2.6 (-4.4-10.0)
Percent Change in Risk (95% CI) for
single and two pollutant models
Single, SGA: 4.6 (-0.3-9.8)
Single, VSGA: 4.5 (-4.0-13.4)
Two (PM2.6 & NO2), SGA: 4.5 (-0.4-9.7)
Two (PM2.6 & NO2), VSGA: 3.2 (-5.2-12.4)
Percent Change in Risk (95% CI) by
pregnancy complication in third
trimester
SGA
Any Complication
No: 4.7 (0.6-9.0)
Yes: 2.2 (-6.1-11.3)
Placental Abruption
No: 4.0 (0.3-7.9)
Yes: 11.7 (-21.7-59.5)
Placental Praevia
No: 3.9 (0.2-7.8)
Yes: 23.2 (-20.9-91.9)
Preeclampsia
No: 4.2 (0.4-8.2)
Yes: 2.7 (-13.8-22.3)
Gestational Hypertension
No: 4.3 (0.4-8.4)
Yes: 3.9 (-7.8-17.1)
Premature Rupture of the Membrane
July 2009
E-620
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
No: 3.7 (-0.1-7.7)
Yes: 14.6 (-3.3-35.9)
Gestational Diabetes
No: 4.6 (0.8-8.6)
Yes: -9.3 (-24.7-9.3)
VSGA
Any Complication
No: 1.5 (-6.1-9.7)
Yes: 12.6 (0.1-26.7)
Placental Abruption
No: 4.1 (-2.6-11.2)
Yes: 7.6 (-29.8-64.9)
Placental Praevia
No: 4.1 (-2.5-11.2)
Yes: 3.2 (-43.0-86.9)
Preeclampsia
No: 4.4 (-2.6-11.9)
Yes: 3.9 (-15.7-28.1)
Gestational Hypertension
No: 3.2 (-4.0-10.9)
Yes: 12.9 (-3.3-31.9)
Premature Rupture of the Membrane
No: 3.3 (-3.5-10.5)
Yes: 21.9 (-3.6-54.2)
Gestational Diabetes
No: 4.3 (-2.5-11.5)
Yes: 1.4 (-27.0-40.9)
July 2009
E-621
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Ritz et al. (2007, 096146)
Period of Study: Jan 1, 2003-Dec 31,
2003
Location: Los Angeles, California
Outcome: Preterm births (infants
delivered before 37 weeks)
Age Groups: Births
Study Design: Case-control nested
within a birth cohort (cases and controls
matched on zip code and birth month)
Phase 1: cross-sectional including all birth
cohort
Phase 2: nested case-control of survey
respondents
N: Phase 1: Birth cohort consisted of
58,316 eligible births. Phase II: 2,543
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
regression
Covariates: Birth certificate information:
maternal age, race/ethnicity, parity,
education, season of birth
survey information: maternal smoking,
alcohol consumption, living with a
smoker, and marital status during
pregnancy
income (imputed)
occupation and pregnancy weight gain
considered but not included in final
models
Season:Yes
Dose-response Investigated? Yes,
examined categories of exposure
Statistical Package: NR
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: daily or every 3>d day
used to calculate the entire pregnancy,
the first trimester, and the last 6 weeks
before delivery
only reported first trimester exposures for
PM
Range (Min, Max): NR
Ranges for 3 categories reported:
Low (ref): ~ 18.63
Mid: 18.64-21.36
High: >21.36
Monitoring Stations: Each zip code was
linked to the nearest monitoring station
(number not reported)
Copollutant (correlation): CO
NO?
Os
Notes: Daily or every 3,d day
measurements used for mean calculations
PM Increment: Reported analyses using
exposure categories
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Birth cohort (phase I)
Crude: Low: 1.0
Mid: 0.96 (0.90,1.03)
High: 1.05(0.99,1.12)
Adj for birth cert Covariates: Low: 1.0
Mid: 1.01 (0.93,1.09)
High: 1.10(1.01,1.20)
Survey respondents (phase II)
Crude: Low: 1.0' Mid: 1.11 (0.90,1.36)
High: 1.27 (1.06,1.53)
Adj for birth cert Covariates: Low: 1.0
Mid: 1.14(0.90,1.46)
High: 1.27 (0.99,1.64)
Adj for all Covariates: Low: 1.0
Mid: 1.15(0.90,1.47)
High: 1.29(1.00,1.67)
Two-phase model: * Low: 1.0
Mid: 0.98 (0.84,1.15)
High: 1.07 (0.85,1.35)
"method to reduce potential selection
bias and increase statistical efficiency
Reference: (Slama et al., 2007, 093216) Outcome: Birth weight offspring at term
Period of Study: 111998-111999
Location: Munich, Germany
Study Design: Cohort study
N: 1016 births
Statistical Analyses: Poisson model
Covariates: Maternal passive smoking,
maternal age, gestational duration, sex of
child, parity, maternal education, maternal
size, prepregnancy weight, other
pollutants (PM2.6, PM2.6 absorbance, NO2),
season of conception
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: STATA
Pollutant: PM2.6 (estimated based on
larger PM size fractions)
Averaging Time: Entire pregnancy period
and trimesters
Mean (SD): 14.4
Percentiles: 25th: 13.5
50th (Median): 14.4
75th: 15.4
Monitoring Stations: Spatial component:
40
Temporal component: 1
Copollutant (correlation):
p.a. - pregnancy avg
trim. - trimester
PM2.6 (p.a.)—PM2.E (1st trim.): 0.85
PM2.6 (p.a.)—PM2.B (2nd trim.): 0.77
PM2.6 (p.a.)—PM2.B (3,d trim.): 0.87
PM2.6 (p.a.)—NO2 (p.a.): 0.45
PM2.6 (p.a.)—NO2 (1st trim.): 0.18
PM2.6 (p.a.)—NO2 (2nd trim.): 0.32
PM2.6 (p.a.)—NO2 (3rd trim.): 0.37
PM2.6 (1s,trim.)-PM2.B (2nd trim.): 0.40
PM2.6 (1st trim.)—PM2.E (3,d trim.): 0.68
PM Increment: 1) 1 //g|m3
2) Quartiles: a) 1st (reference) (7.2-
13.5//g/m3)
b) 2nd (13.5-14.4 //gfm3)
c) 3rd (14.4-15.4 //g/m3)
d) 4th (15.41-17.5//g/m3)
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
< 3000 g during exposure over the
whole pregnancy
Single-pollutant models
Unadjusted models
2nd quartile: 1.07 (0.65,1.73); 3rd
quartile: 1.38 (0.91, 2.09)
4th quartile: 1.45 (0.92, 2.25)
Per 1 //g/m3: 1.06 (0.95, 1.19)
Adjusted models
2nd quartile: 1.08 (0.63,1.82); 3rd
quartile: 1.34 (0.86, 2.13)
4th quartile: 1.73 (1.15, 2.69); Per
1 //g/m3: 1.13 (1.00, 1.29)
Multipollutant models
Adjusted models
2nd quartile: 1.01 (0.57,1.85)
3rd quartile: 1.12(0.64,1.87)
_^th_^uartileM_;36_(0i^2;_2;45h_Pei^^^^^_
July 2009
E-622
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
1 //g|mT 1.07 (0.91,1.26)
PM2.6
PM2.6
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.6
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.6
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
0.29
PM2.B
PM2.6
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
1st trim.)-l\l02 (p a.): 0.48
1st trim.)—IMO2 (1st trim.): 0.15
1st trim.)-l\l02 (2nd trim.): 0.41
1st trim.)-PJ02 (3rd trim.): 0.39
2nd trim.)—PM2.B (3,d trim.): 0.51
2nd trim.)—NO2 (p.a.): 0.23
2nd trim.)-l\l02 (1st trim.): -0.03
2nd trim.)—NO2 (2nd trim.): 0.17
2nd trim.)—NO2 (3,d trim.): 0.30
3,d trim.)-N02 (p a.): 0.39
3,d trim.)-N02 (1st trim.): 0.33
3,d trim.)-N02 (2nd trim.): 0.21
3,d trim.)-N02 (3rd trim.): 0.23
p.a.)- PM2.B absorbance (p.a.): 0.69
p.a.)- PM2.B abs (1st trim.): 0.33
p.a.)- PM2.6 abs (2nd trim.): 0.48
p.a.)- PM2.B abs (3,d trim.): 0.52
1st trim.)- PM2.B abs (p.a.): 0.68
1st trim.)- PM2.6 abs (1st trim.): 0.27
1st trim.)- PM2.B abs (2nd trim.): 0.53
1st trim.)- PM2.6 abs (3rd trim.): 0.51
2nd trim.)- PM2 b abs(p.a.): 0.41
2nd trim.)- PM2.6 abs (1st trim.): 0.08
2nd trim.)- PM2.6 abs (2nd trim.):
2nd trim.)- PM2.6 abs (3,d trim.): 0.41
3,d trim.)- PM2.B abs (p.a.): 0.62
3,d trim.)- PM2.1, abs (1st trim.): 0.48
3,d trim.)- PM2.B abs (2nd trim.): 0.36
3,d trim.)- PM2.B abs (3rd trim.): 0.37
Single-pollutant models (restricted
analysis to PM2.6 absorbance below the
median)
Per 1 //g/m3: 1.15 (0.89, 1.52)
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
<3000 g
Multipollutant models (simultaneous
adjustment of 3rd trimester PM2.6 and
whole pregnancy PM2.6)
PM2.B (whole pregnancy)
Per 1 /yg/m3: 0.96 (0.75, 1.19)
PM2.B (3rd trimester)
Per 1 //g/m3: 1.17 (0.98, 1.40)
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
< 3000 g during exposure over the
whole pregnancy (adjustment for
season of conception)
4th quartile: 1.68 (1.05, 2.75); Per
1 //g/m3: 1.12 (0.97, 1.28)
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
< 3000 g during exposure over first
trimester of pregnancy
Each trimester separately
2nd quartile: 1.14 (0.74,1.96); 3rd
quartile: 1.28(0.84,2.10)
4th quartile: 1.65 (1.02, 2.60)
Per 1 /yglm3: 1.10 (0.99, 1.20)
All trimesters adjusted simultaneously
2nd quartile: 0.97 (0.60,1.73); 3rd
quartile: 0.98 (0.57,1.75)
4th quartile: 1.22(0.71,2.18)
Per 1 //g/m3: 1.03 (0.90, 1.17)
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
< 3000 g during exposure over second
trimester of pregnancy
Each trimester separately
2nd quartile: 0.83 (0.52,1.32); 3rd
quartile: 1.08 (0.71,1.60)
4th quartile: 0.94 (0.61,1.47)
Per 1 //g/m3: 1.01 (0.92,1.12)
All trimesters adjusted simultaneously
2nd quartile: 0.75 (0.46,1.24)
3rd quartile: 0.86 (0.56,1.30);
4th quartile: 0.75(0.48,1.23)
Per 1 //g/m3: 0.94 (0.84,1.06)
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
< 3000 g during exposure over third
trimester of pregnancy
Each trimester separately
2nd quartile: 1.30 (0.80, 2.17)
3rd quartile: 1.44(0.85,2.27)
4th quartile: 1.90(1.20, 2.82)
July 2009
E-623
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: (Slama et al„ 2007, 093216) Outcome: Birth weight offspring at term
Period of Study: 111998 -111999 Study Design: Cohort study
Location: Munich, Germany N: 1016 births
Statistical Analyses: Poisson model
Covariates: Maternal passive smoking,
maternal age, gestational duration, sex of
child, parity, maternal education, maternal
size, prepregnancy weight, other
pollutants (PM2.6, PM2.6 absorbance, NO2),
season of conception
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: STATA
Pollutant: PM2.6 absorbance (estimated)
Averaging Time: Entire pregnancy period
and trimesters
Mean (SD): 1.76*
Percentiles: 25th: 1.61*
50th (Median): 1.72*
75th: 1.89*
Unit (i.e. /yg/m3): 106/m
Monitoring Stations: Spatial component:
40
Temporal component: 1
Copollutant (correlation):
p.a. - pregnancy avg
trim. - trimester
abs -
absorbance
PM2.6
abs
p.a.)—PM2.E abs (1st trim.): 0.54
PM2.6
abs
p.a.)—PM2.B abs (2nd trim.): 0.84
PM2.6
abs
p.a.)—PM2.B abs (3,d trim.): 0.55
PM2.6
abs
p.a.)—PM2.B (p.a.): 0.69
PM2.6
abs
p.a.)—PM2.B (1st trim.): 0.68
PM2.6
abs
p.a.)—PM2.B (2nd trim.): 0.41
PM2.6
abs
p.a.)—PM2.B (3,d trim.): 0.62
PM2.6
abs
p.a.)—NO2 (p.a.): 0.67
PM2.6
abs
p.a.)-N02 (1st trim.): 0.34
PM2.6
abs
p.a.)-N02 (2nd trim.): 0.63
PM2.6
abs
p.a.)—NO2 (3,d trim.): 0.36
PM2.6
0.32
abs
1st trim.)—PM2.B abs (2nd trim.):
PM2.6
abs
1st trim.)—PM2.B abs (3,d trim.): ¦
Per 1 //g/m3: 1.14 (1.02,1.24)
All trimesters adjusted simultaneously
2nd quartile: 1.34 (0.79, 2.30)
3rd quartile: 1.48 (0.86, 2.58)
4th quartile: 1.91 (1.00, 3.20)
Per 1 //g/m3: 1.14 (0.99,1.29)
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
< 3000 g during exposure over third
trimester of pregnancy (adjustment for
season of conception)
All trimesters adjusted simultaneously
Per 1 //g/m3 1.25 (1.04,1.50)
Sensitivity analysisfbootstrapped PR)
2nd quartile: 0.98 (0.63,1.61); 3rd
quartile: 1.22(0.82, 2.02)
4th quartile: 1.57(1.02, 2.57)
Per 1 //g/m3: 1.1 1 (0.98, 1.27)
Estimated increments in prevalence of
birth weight of < 3000 g during
exposure 9 months after birth Per
1 //g/m3: 7% (-7%, 22%)
PM Increment: 1) 0.5 * 106/m 2)
Quartiles: a) 1st (reference) (1.29-1.61)
b) 2nd (1.61-1.72)
c) 3rd (1.72-1.89)
d) 4th (1.89-3.10)
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
< 3000 g during exposure over the
whole pregnancy
Single-pollutant models Unadjusted
models
2nd quartile: 1.19 (0.74,1.99)
3rd quartile: 1.56 (0.98, 2.50);
4th quartile: 1.52 (0.96, 2.46)
Per 0.5 * 10B/m: 1.25 (0.90,1.70)
Adjusted models
2nd quartile: 1.21 (0.73,1.97)
3rd quartile: 1.63 (0.98, 2.57);
4th quartile: 1.78(1.10, 2.70)
Per 0.5 * 10B/m: 1.45 (1.06,1.87)
Multipollutant models Adjusted models
2nd quartile: 1.19 (0.70, 2.01)
3rd quartile: 1.55 (0.80, 2.80);
4th quartile: 1.46 (0.67, 2.90)
Per 0.5 * 10B/m: 1.33 (0.76, 2.38)
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
< 3000 g during exposure over the
whole pregnancy (adjustment for
season of conception)
4th quartile: 1.72(1.08, 2.73)
Per 0.5 * 10B/m: 1.38 (0.96,1.86)
July 2009
E-624
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
0.26
PM2.6 abs
PM2.6 abs
PM2.6 abs
PM2.6 abs
PM2.6 abs
PM2.6 abs
PM2.B abs
PM2.B abs
PM2.6 abs
0.31
PM2.B abs
PM2.6 abs
PM2.B abs
PM2.6 abs
PM2.B abs
PM2.B abs
PM2.6 abs
PM2.B abs
PM2.6 abs
PM2.B abs
PM2.B abs
PM2.B abs
PM2.B abs
PM2.B abs
PM2.B abs
PM2.B abs
" trim.
" trim.
" trim.
" trim.
" trim.
" trim.
" trim.
" trim.
2nd trim.
2nd trim.
2nd trim.
2nd trim.
2nd trim.
2nd trim.
2nd trim.
2nd trim.
2nd trim.
3,d trim.
3,d trim.
3,d trim.
3,d trim.
3,d trim.
3,d trim.
3,d trim.
3,d trim.
-PM2.B (p.a.): 0.33
-PM2.B (1st trim.): 0.27
-PM2.B (2nd trim.): 0.08
-PM2 B (3,d trim ): 0.48
-NO2 (p.a.): 0.29
-NO2 (1st trim.): 0.84
-NO2 (2nd trim.): 0.16
-NO2 (3rd trim.): -0.39
PM2.Babs (3,d trim.):
PM2.B (p.a.): 0.48
PM2.B (1st trim.): 0.53
PM2.B (2nd trim.): 0.29
PM2.B (3rd trim.): 0.36
NO2 (p.a.): 0.61
NO2 (1st trim.): 0.19
NO2 (2nd trim.): 0.85
NO2 (3,d trim.): 0.17
-PM2.B (p.a.): 0.52
-PM2.B (1st trim.): 0.51
—PM2.B (2nd trim.): 0.41
-PM2 B (3,d trim ): 0.37
-NO2 (p.a.): 0.40
-NO2 (1st trim.): -0.34
-NO2 (2nd trim.): 0.21
-NO2 (3rd trim.): 0.88
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
< 3000 g during exposure over the
whole pregnancy
Single-pollutant models
(restricted analysis to PM2.6 below the
median)
Per 0.5 * 10B/m: 1.67 (0.66, 3.73)
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
< 3000 g during exposure over first
trimester of pregnancy
Each trimester separately
2nd quartile: 1.15 (0.73,1.80)
3rd quartile: 1.01 (0.61,1.53);
4th quartile: 1.04 (0.70,1.57)
Per 0.5 * 10B/m: 1.03 (0.82,1.28)
All trimesters adjusted simultaneously
2nd quartile: 0.90 (0.52,1.58)
3rd quartile: 0.82 (0.45,1.31);
4th quartile: 0.88 (0.53,1.42)
Per 0.5 * 10B/m: 1.02 (0.77,1.29)
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
< 3000 g during exposure over second
trimester of pregnancy
Each trimester separately
2nd quartile: 1.33 (0.85, 2.22)
3rd quartile: 1.76(1.07,2.91);
4th quartile: 1.83(1.11,2.81)
Per 0.5 * 10B/m: 1.27 (1.04,1.54)
All trimesters adjusted simultaneously
2nd quartile: 1.30 (0.77, 2.16)
3rd quartile: 1.63 (0.93, 2.73);
4th quartile: 1.99(1.12, 3.33)
Per 0.5* 10B/m: 1.21 (0.93,1.54)
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
< 3000 g during exposure over third
trimester of pregnancy
Each trimester separately
2nd quartile: 1.30 (0.85, 2.09)
3rd quartile: 0.92 (0.55,1.50);
4th quartile: 1.50(1.00, 2.27)
Per 0.5 * 10B/m: 1.20 (0.98,1.44)
All trimesters adjusted simultaneously
2nd quartile: 0.99 (0.64,1.62)
3rd quartile: 0.71 (0.40,1.20);
4th quartile: 1.14(0.68,1.91)
Per 0.5 * 10B/m: 1.15 (0.92,1.42)
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
< 3000 g during exposure over first
trimester of pregnancy
(adjustment for season of conception)
July 2009
E-625
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
All trimesters adjusted simultaneously
4th quartile: 0.73 (0.38,1.38)
Per 0.5 * 10'6/m: 0.93(0.41,1.32)
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
< 3000 g during exposure over second
trimester of pregnancy (adjustment for
season of conception)
All trimesters adjusted simultaneously
4th quartile: 2.45(1.22, 4.77)
Per 0.5 * 10B/m: 1.14(0.70,1.64)
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
< 3000 g during exposure over third
trimester of pregnancy
(adjustment for season of conception)
All trimesters adjusted simultaneously
4th quartile: 1.19 (0.60, 2.48)
Per 0.5 * 10B/m: 1.29 (0.90,1.75)
Sensitivity analysis (bootstrapped PR)
2nd quartile: 1.19 (0.76,1.91)
3rd quartile: 1.52 (0.99, 2.34);
4th quartile: 1.62 (1.06, 2.55)
Per 0.5 * 10B/m: 1.35 (1.01,1.83)
Estimated increments in prevalence of
birth weight < 3000 g during
exposure 9 months after birth Per 0.5
* 10'6|m: 18% (-16%, 57%)
Reference: Wilhelm et al. (2005,
088668)
Outcome: Term low birth weight (LBW)
(<2500 g at a 37 completed weeks
gestation)
Period of Study: 1994-2000
Vaginal birth < 37 completed weeks
Location: Los Angeles County, California, gestation
U.S.
Age Groups: LBW: a 37 completed
weeks
Preterm births: <37 completed weeks
Study Design: cross-sectional study
N: For LBW: 136,134
For preterm birth:
106,483
Statistical Analyses: Logistic regression
Covariates: Maternal age, maternal race,
maternal education, parity, interval since
previous live birth, level of prenatal care,
infant sex, previous LBW or preterm
infant, birth season, other pollutants (not
specified in birth weight analyses, also
adjusted for gestational age)
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: NR
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24hr (every 3 days)
Entire pregnancy
Trimesters of pregnancy
Months of pregnancy
6 weeks before birth
Mean (SD): First trimester: 21.9
Third trimester: 21.0
6 weeks before birth: 21.0
Range (Min, Max):
First trimester: 11.8-38.9
Third trimester: 11.8-.38.9
6 weeks before birth: 9.9-48.5
Monitoring Stations:
Zip-code-level analysis: 9
Address-level analysis: 8
Copollutant (correlation): First trimester
PM2.B-C0: 0.57
PM2.B-N02: 0.73
PM2.B-03: -0.55
PM2.b-PMio: 0.43
Third trimester: PM2.B-C0: 0.67
PM Increment: 1) 10/yg/m3
2) 3 levels: a) < 25%ile (reference)
b) 25%-75%ile
c) > 75%ile
Incidence of LBW (third trimester
exposure)
< 17.1 //g/m3: 2.4(2.0, 2.8)
17.1 to < 24.0/yglm3: 2.2 (2.0, 2.5)
a 24.0/yg/m3: 2.1 (1.7, 2.4)
Incidence of preterm birth (first
trimester exposure)
< 18.0//g/m3: 10.6 (9.6,11.7)
18.0 to < 25.4/yglm3: 8.8 (8.1, 9.5)
a 25.4/yg/m3: 9.0(8.1,10.0)
Incidence of preterm birth (6 weeks
before birth exposure)
< 16.5/yg/m3: 8.2(7.4,9.1)
16.5 to < 24.7/yg/m3: 8.8 (8.2, 9.4)
>24.7/yg|m3: 9.6(8.7,10.5)
Outcome: Preterm birth
Exposure Period: First trimester of
pregnancy
Address-level analysis: Single-pollutant
model: Distance ~ 1 mile
July 2009
E-626
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
PM2.B-N02: 0.78
PM2.B-03: -0.60
PM2.b-PMio: 0.52
6 weeks before birth: PM2.B-C0: 0.63
PM2.B-N02: 0.74
PM2.B-03: -0.60
PM2.b-PMio: 0.60
Per 10//g/m3: 0.85 (0.70, 1.02)
18.1 to < 25.2//g/m3: 0.91 (0.72,1.16)
> 25.2//g/m3: 0.83 (0.60,1.14)
Single-pollutant model: 1 < distance ~ 2
mile
Per 10//g/m3: 0.85 (0.74,0.99)
18.3 to < 25.2//g/m3: 0.81 (0.69, 0.94)
>25.2//g/m3: 0.79 (0.65, 0.97)
Multipollutant modeM < distance ~ 2
mile
Per 10//g/m3: 1.18(0.84,1.65)
Single-pollutant model: 2 < distance ~ 4
mile
Per 10//g/m3: 0.83 (0.78, 0.88)
18.5 to < 24.9//g/m3: 0.79 (0.74, 0.85)
> 24.9//g/m3: 0.76 (0.70, 0.84)
Zip-code-level analysis: Single-pollutant
model: Per 10//g/m3: 0.73 (0.67, 0.80)
18.0 to < 25.4//g/m3: 0.70 (0.61, 0.80)
a 25.4//g/m3: 0.64 (0.53, 0.76)
Outcome: Preterm birth
Exposure Period: 6 weeks before birth
Address-level analysis:
Single-pollutant model: Distance ~ 1 mile
Per 10//g/m3: 1.09 (0.91, 1.30)
16.8 to <24.1 //g/m3:1.21 (0.97,1.51)
> 24.1 //g/m3:1.25 (0.93, 1.68)
Single-pollutant model: 1 < distance ~ 2
mile
Per 10//g/m3: 1.08 (0.97, 1.21)
17.2 to < 24.5//g/m3: 0.94 (0.82,1.08)
> 24.5//g/m3:1.04 (0.87,1.24)
Single-pollutant model: 2 < distance ~ 4
mile
Per 10//g/m3: 1.05 (0.99, 1.10)
17.3 to < 24.6//g/m3:1.06 (1.00, 1.13)
> 24.6//g/m3:1.08 (0.99, 1.17)
Zip-code-level analysis
Single-pollutant model: Per 10//g/m3:
1.10(1.00,1.21)
16.5 to < 24.7//g/m3:1.06 (0.94,1.20)
> 24.7//g/m3:1.19(1.02,1.40)
(See Notes1)
Multipollutant model
Per 10 //g/m3: 1.12(0.90,1.40)
> 24.6 //g/m3:1.12 (0.82, 1.52)
Notes:11n the table, the 75%ile is noted
as 24.7 /yglm3. However, the text notes
the 75%ile as 24.3/yglm3.
July 2009
E-627
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Woodruff et al. (2006,
088758)
Period of Study: 1999-2000
Location: California
Outcome (ICD10): SIDS (R95)
Respiratory mortality (J00-J99)
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (P27.1)
External accidents (V01-Y98)
Ill-defined and unspecified causes of
mortality (R99)
Age Groups: > 28 days old
Study Design: Matched case-control
(matched on date of birth and birth
weight)
N: 3877 infants
Statistical Analyses: Conditional logistic
regression
Covariates: Maternal race, education,
parity, age, marital status
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: STATA
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 hrs (every 6 days)
(time period between birth and post
neonatal death for the infant who died
and the same period for its four matched
surviving infants) Percentiles: Infants
who died of all causes (cases)
25th: 13.4
50th (Median): 19.2
75th: 23.6
Matched controls
25th: 13.5
50th (Median): 18.4
75th: 22.7
Monitoring Stations:
73 (from 39 counties)
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
All-cause mortality: Unadjusted: 1.15
(1.00,1.32)
Adjusted: 1.07 (0.93,1.24)
Cause-specific mortality: Respiratory (all):
Unadjusted: 2.15(1.15, 4.02)
Adjusted: 2.13(1.12,4.05)
Respiratory (excluding deaths due to
BPD): Adjusted: 1.42 (0.66, 3.03)
Respiratory (BPD alone): Unadjusted: 6.00
(1.40, 27.76)
Respiratory (low birth weight infants
only): Unadjusted: 3.09 (1.14, 8.40)
Respiratory (normal birth weight infants
only): Unadjusted: 1.66 (0.74, 3.70)
Respiratory (with matched PM2.6 averaged
over all monitors in county)
Adjusted: 2.28 (0.94, 5.52)
Respiratory (averaging all PM2.6
measurements in county over the 2-year
study period): Adjusted: 2.26 (0.83, 6.21)
SIDS: Unadjusted: 0.86 (0.61,1.22)
Adjusted: 0.82 (0.55,1.23)
SIDS (includes ICD10 code R99: ill-defined
and unspecified causes of mortality):
Adjusted: 1.03 (0.79,1.35)
External causes: Unadjusted: 0.91 (0.56,
1.47)
Adjusted: 0.83 (0.50,1.39)
Compare against the lowest quartile,
estimates for respiratory-specific
mortality were provided: 2nd quartile: 1.28
(0.47,3.51)
3,d quartile: 1.75(0.65, 4.72)
4th quartile: 2.35 (0.85, 6.54)
July 2009
E-628
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Woodruff et al. (2008,
098386)
Period of Study: 1999-2002
Location: US counties with >250,000
residents (96 counties)
All other deaths evaluated as a control
category
Age Groups: Infants aged > 28 days and
<1 yr
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 3,583,495 births (6,639 post neonatal
deaths)
Statistical Analyses: Logistic GEE
(exchangeable correlation structure)
Covariates: maternal race/ethnicity,
marital status, age, education, primiparity,
county-level poverty and per capita
income levels, year and month of birth
dummy variables to account for time trend
and seasonal effects, and region of the
country
sensitivity analyses performed among only
those mothers with smoking information
(adjustment for smoking had no effect on
the estimates)
Season: Adjusted for year and month of
birth dummy variables to account for time
trend and seasonal effects
Dose-response Investigated? Evaluated
the appropriateness of a linear form from
analysis based on quartiles of exposure
and concluded that linear form was
appropriate (data not shown)
Statistical Package: SAS
'All units expressed in //gfm3 unless otherwise specified.
Outcome (ICD10): Postneonatal deaths:
Respiratory mortality (J000-99, plus
bronchopulmonary dysplasia [BPD] P27.1)
SIDS (R95)
Ill-defined causes (R99)
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: Measured continuously
for 24 h once every 6 days
exposure assigned by calculating avg
concentration of pollutant during first 2
months of life
Median and IQR (25th-75th percentile):
Survivors: 14.8(11.7-18.7)
All causes of death: 14.9 (12.0-18.6)
Respiratory: 14.8(11.5-18.5)
SIDS: 14.5(12.0-17.5)
SIDS + ill-defined: 14.8(12.1-18.5)
Other causes: 14.9 (12.0-18.6)
Percentiles: See above
PM Component: Not assessed, but
controlled for region of the country to
account for PM composition variation
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant (correlation):
PMio (r - 0.34)
PM2.6
CO (r - 0.35)
SO2 (r - 0.21)
O3 (r - -0.10)
Notes: Monthly averages calculated if
there were at least 3 available measures
for PM
Assigned exposures using the avg
concentration of the county of residence
PM Increment: IQR (7/yglm3)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Adjusted ORs for single pollutant models
All causes: 1.04 (0.98,1.11)
Respiratory: 1.11 (0.96,1.29)
SIDS: 1.01 (0.86,1.20)
Ill-defined + SIDS: 1.06(0.97,1.17)
Other causes: 1.03 (0.96,1.12)
Adjusted ORs for multipollutant models
(including CO, O3, SO2)
Respiratory: 1.05 (0.89,1.24)
SIDS: 1.04 (0.87,1.23)
OR for respiratory deaths assessing
exposure as quartiles
Highest vs Lowest quartile: 1.39 (1.04,
1.85)
July 2009
E-629
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
E.8. Long-Term Exposure and Mortality
Table E-30. Long-term exposure - mortality - PM10.
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: (Breitner et al„ 2009,
188439)
Period of Study: 10/1 /1991 to
313112002
Location: Efurt, Germany
Outcome: Mortality, excluding infants
and ICD-9 > 800
Study Design: Time-series
Covariates: seasonal and weekday
variations, influenza epidemics, air
temperature, relative humidity
Statistical Analysis: semiparametric
Poisson regression, polynomial distributed
lag (PDL)
Statistical Package: R
Age Groups: All
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: daily
Mean (SD) Unit:
1 (10/1/1991-8/31/1995): 50.6 ± 32.2
/yg/m3
2(9/1/1995-2/28/19981:41.1 ±28.4
/yg/m3
3(3/1/1998-3/31/2002): 24.3 ± 15.4
/yg/m3
Total: 38.0 ±28.3/yg/m3
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant: NO2, CO, UFP
Increment: IQR
Relative Risk (95% CI)
Lag
New City Limits
6-day IQR: 17.2
PDL: 0.997 (0.972-1.022)
Mean of lags 0-5: 0.995 (0.971-1.019)
Old City Limits
6-day IQR: 17.2
PDL: 1.004 (0.978-1.031)
Mean of lags 0-5: 1.001 (0.976-1.027)
New City Limits
15-day IQR: 14.5
PDL: 1.008 (0.982-1.036)
Mean of lags 0-14: 1.006 (0.981-1.032)
Old City Limits
15-day IQR: 14.5
PDL: 1.019(0.991-1.048)
Mean of lags 0-14:1.017(0.990-1.044)
Multiday Moving Averages, 6-day
Overall IQR: 24.2
Overall RR (95% CI): 0.998 (0.976-
1.021)
Period 1: 0.996 (0.969-1.024)
Period 2: 1.013 (0.972-1.056)
Period 3: 0.949 (0.897-1.004)
Multiday Moving Averages, 15-day
Overall IQR: 22.3
Overall RR (95% CI): 1.020 (0.993-
1.093)
Period 1: 1.017 (0.984-1.051)
Period 2: 1.012(0.973-1.071)
Period 3: 0.978(0.911-1.051)
Reference: (Slama et al„ 2007, 093216) Outcome: Birth weight offspring at term
Period of Study: 1/1998-1/1999
Location: Munich, Germany
Study Design: Cohort study
N: 1016 births
Statistical Analyses: Poisson model
Covariates: Maternal passive smoking,
maternal age, gestational duration, sex of
child, parity, maternal education, maternal
size, prepregnancy weight, other
pollutants (PM2.6, PM2.6 absorbance, NO2),
Pollutant: PM2.6 (estimated based on
larger PM size fractions)
Averaging Time: Entire pregnancy period
and trimesters
Mean (SD): 14.4
Percentiles: 25th: 13.5
50th (Median): 14.4
75th: 15.4
PM Increment: 1) 1 /yg/m3
2) Quartiles: a) 1st (reference) (7.2-
13.5/yg/m3)
b) 2nd (13.5-14.4 /yg/m3)
c) 3rd (14.4-15.4/yg/m3)
d) 4th (15.41-17.5/yg/m3)
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
< 3000 g during exposure over the
July 2009
E-630
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
season of conception
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: STATA
Monitoring Stations: Spatial component:
40
Temporal component: 1
Copollutant (correlation!:
p.a. - pregnancy avg
trim. - trimester
PM2.6
PM2.6
PM2.6
PM2.6
PM2.B
PM2.6
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.6
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.6
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
0.29
PM2.B
PM2.6
PM2.B
PM2.B
PM2.B
p.a.)—PM2.B (1st trim.): 0.85
p.a.)—PM2.B (2nd trim.): 0.77
p.a.)—PM2.B (3,d trim.): 0.87
p.a.)—IMO2 (p.a.): 0.45
p.a.)—IMO2 (1st trim.): 0.18
p.a.)—NO2 (2nd trim.): 0.32
p.a.)—NO2 (3rd trim.): 0.37
1st trim.)—PM2.B (2nd trim.): 0.40
1st trim.)-PM2.B (3rd trim.): 0.68
1st trim.)-PJ02 (p.a.): 0.48
1st trim.)—IMO2 (1st trim.): 0.15
1st trim.)-PJ02 (2nd trim.): 0.41
1st trim.)-PJ02 (3rd trim.): 0.39
2nd trim.)—PM2.B (3,d trim.): 0.51
2nd trim.)-N02 (p.a.): 0.23
2nd trim.)-N02 (1st trim.): -0.03
2nd trim.)—NO2 (2nd trim.): 0.17
2nd trim.)—NO2 (3,d trim.): 0.30
3,d trim.)-N02 (p.a.): 0.39
3,d trim.)-N02 (1st trim.): 0.33
3,d trim.)-N02 (2nd trim.): 0.21
3,d trim.)-N02 (3rd trim.): 0.23
p.a.)- PM2.6 absorbance (p.a.): 0.69
p.a.)- PM2.6 abs (1st trim.): 0.33
p.a.)- PM2.6 abs (2nd trim.): 0.48
p.a.)- PM2.B abs (3,d trim.): 0.52
1st trim.)- PM2.6 abs (p.a.): 0.68
1st trim.)- PM2.6 abs (1st trim.): 0.27
1st trim.)- PM2.B abs (2nd trim.): 0.53
1st trim.)- PM2.6 abs (3rd trim.): 0.51
2nd trim.)- PM2.B abs(p.a.): 0.41
2nd trim.)- PM2.B abs (1st trim.): 0.08
2nd trim.)- PM2.6 abs (2nd trim.):
2nd trim.)- PM2.B abs (3,d trim.): 0.41
3,d trim.)- PM2.6 abs (p.a.): 0.62
3,d trim.)- PM2.B abs (1st trim.): 0.48
3,d trim.)- PM2.6 abs (2nd trim.): 0.36
3,d trim.)- PM2.1, abs (3rd trim.): 0.37
whole pregnancy
Single-pollutant models
Unadjusted models
2nd quartile: 1.07 (0.65,1.73); 3rd
quartile: 1.38 (0.91, 2.09)
4th quartile: 1.45 (0.92, 2.25)
Per 1 /yglm3: 1.06 (0.95, 1.19)
Adjusted models
2nd quartile: 1.08 (0.63,1.82); 3rd
quartile: 1.34 (0.86, 2.13)
4th quartile: 1.73 (1.15, 2.69); Per
1 //g/m3: 1.13 (1.00, 1.29)
Multipollutant models
Adjusted models
2nd quartile: 1.01 (0.57,1.85)
3rd quartile: 1.12(0.64,1.87)
4th quartile: 1.36 (0.72, 2.45); Per
1 //g/m3: 1.07 (0.91, 1.26)
Single-pollutant models (restricted
analysis to PM2.6 absorbance below the
median)
Per 1 //g/m3: 1.15 (0.89, 1.52)
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
<3000 g
Multipollutant models (simultaneous
adjustment of 3rd trimester PM2.6 and
whole pregnancy PM2.6)
PM2.B (whole pregnancy)
Per 1 //g/m3: 0.96 (0.75, 1.19)
PM2.6 (3rd trimester)
Per 1 //g/m3: 1.17 (0.98, 1.40)
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
< 3000 g during exposure over the
whole pregnancy (adjustment for
season of conception)
4th quartile: 1.68 (1.05, 2.75); Per
1 //g/m3: 1.12 (0.97, 1.28)
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
< 3000 g during exposure over first
trimester of pregnancy
Each trimester separately
2nd quartile: 1.14(0.74,1.96); 3rd
quartile: 1.28(0.84,2.10)
4th quartile: 1.65 (1.02, 2.60)
Per 1 //g/m3: 1.10 (0.99, 1.20)
All trimesters adjusted simultaneously
2nd quartile: 0.97 (0.60,1.73); 3rd
quartile: 0.98 (0.57,1.75)
4th quartile: 1.22(0.71,2.18)
Per 1 //g/m3: 1.03 (0.90, 1.17)
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
< 3000 g during exposure over second
trimester of pregnancy
July 2009
E-631
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Each trimester separately
2nd quartile: 0.83 (0.52,1.32); 3rd
quartile: 1.08 (0.71,1.60)
4th quartile: 0.94 (0.61,1.47)
Per 1 //g/m3: 1.01 (0.92,1.12)
All trimesters adjusted simultaneously
2nd quartile: 0.75 (0.46,1.24)
3rd quartile: 0.86 (0.56,1.30);
4th quartile: 0.75(0.48,1.23)
Per 1 //g/m3: 0.94 (0.84,1.06)
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
< 3000 g during exposure over third
trimester of pregnancy
Each trimester separately
2nd quartile: 1.30 (0.80, 2.17)
3rd quartile: 1.44(0.85,2.27)
4th quartile: 1.90(1.20, 2.82)
Per 1 //g/m3: 1.14 (1.02,1.24)
All trimesters adjusted simultaneously
2nd quartile: 1.34 (0.79, 2.30)
3rd quartile: 1.48 (0.86, 2.58)
4th quartile: 1.91 (1.00, 3.20)
Per 1 //g/m3: 1.14 (0.99,1.29)
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
< 3000 g during exposure over third
trimester of pregnancy (adjustment for
season of conception)
All trimesters adjusted simultaneously
Per 1 /yg|m3:1.25 (1.04,1.50)
Sensitivity analysisfbootstrapped PR)
2nd quartile: 0.98 (0.63,1.61); 3rd
quartile: 1.22(0.82, 2.02)
4th quartile: 1.57(1.02, 2.57)
Per 1 //g/m3: 1.1 1 (0.98, 1.27)
Estimated increments in prevalence of
birth weight of < 3000 g during
exposure 9 months after birth Per
1 /yglm3: 7% (-7%, 22%)
Reference: (Slama et al„ 2007, 093216) Outcome: Birth weight offspring at term
Period of Study: 111998 -111999 Study Design: Cohort study
Location: Munich, Germany N: 1016 births
Statistical Analyses: Poisson model
Covariates: Maternal passive smoking,
maternal age, gestational duration, sex of
child, parity, maternal education, maternal
size, prepregnancy weight, other
pollutants (PM2.6, PM2.6 absorbance, NO2),
season of conception
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: STATA
Pollutant: PM2.6 absorbance (estimated)
Averaging Time: Entire pregnancy period
and trimesters
Mean (SD): 1.76*
Percentiles: 25th: 1.61*
50th (Median): 1.72*
75th: 1.89*
Unit (i.e. /yg/m3): 106/m
Monitoring Stations: Spatial component:
40
Temporal component: 1
Copollutant (correlation):
PM Increment: 1) 0.5 * 106/m 2)
Quartiles: a) 1st (reference) (1.29-1.61)
b) 2nd (1.61-1.72)
c) 3rd (1.72-1.89)
d) 4th (1.89-3.10)
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
< 3000 g during exposure over the
whole pregnancy
Single-pollutant models Unadjusted
models
2nd quartile: 1.19 (0.74,1.99)
3rd quartile: 1.56 (0.98, 2.50);
4th quartile: 1.52 (0.96, 2.46)
July 2009
E-632
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
p.a. - pregnancy avg
Per 0.5 * 10B/m: 1.25 (0.90,1.70)
trim. - trimester
Adjusted models
abs - absorbance
2nd quartile: 1.21 (0.73,1.97)
PM2.6 abs
p.a.)—PM2.B abs (1st trim.): 0.54
3rd quartile: 1.63 (0.98, 2.57);
PM2.6 abs
p.a.)—PM2.B abs (2nd trim.): 0.84
4th quartile: 1.78(1.10, 2.70)
PM2.6 abs
p.a.)—PM2.B abs (3,d trim.): 0.55
Per 0.5 * 10B/m: 1.45 (1.06,1.87)
PM2.6 abs
p.a.)—PM2.B (p.a.): 0.69
Multipollutant models Adjusted models
PM2.6 abs
p.a.)—PM2.B (1st trim.): 0.68
2nd quartile: 1.19 (0.70, 2.01)
PM2.6 abs
p.a.)—PM2.B (2nd trim.): 0.41
3rd quartile: 1.55 (0.80, 2.80);
PM2.6 abs
p.a.)—PM2.B (3,d trim.): 0.62
4th quartile: 1.46 (0.67, 2.90)
PM2.6 abs
p.a.)—NO2 (p.a.): 0.67
Per 0.5 * 10B/m: 1.33 (0.76, 2.38)
PM2.B abs
p.a.)—NO2 (1st trim.): 0.34
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
PM2.6 abs
p.a.)—NO2 (2nd trim.): 0.63
< 3000 g during exposure over the
whole pregnancy (adjustment for
PM2.B abs
p.a.)—NO2 (3,d trim.): 0.36
season of conception)
PM2.6 abs
0.32
1st trim.)—PM2.B abs (2nd trim.):
4th quartile: 1.72(1.08, 2.73)
Per 0.5 * 10B/m: 1.38 (0.96,1.86)
PM2.B abs
1st trim.)—PM2.B abs (3,d trim.): ¦
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
0.26
< 3000 g during exposure over the
PM2.6 abs
1st trim.)-PM2.B (p.a.): 0.33
whole pregnancy
PM2.B abs
1st trim.)-PM2.B (1st trim.): 0.27
Single-pollutant models
PM2.6 abs
1st trim.)—PM2.B (2nd trim.): 0.08
(restricted analysis to PM2.E below the
median)
PM2.B abs
1st trim.)—PM2.B (3,d trim.): 0.48
Per 0.5 * 10B/m: 1.67 (0.66, 3.73)
PM2.B abs
1st trim.)-PJ02 (p.a ): 0.29
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
PM2.6 abs
1st trim.)—IMO2 (1st trim.): 0.84
< 3000 g during exposure over first
PM2.B abs
1st trim.)—IMO2 (2nd trim.): 0.16
trimester of pregnancy
PM2.6 abs
Each trimester separately
1st trim.)-l\l02 (3,d trim.): -0.39
PM2.B abs
2nd trim.)—PM2.B abs (3,d trim.):
2nd quartile: 1.15 (0.73,1.80)
0.31
3rd quartile: 1.01 (0.61,1.53);
PM2.6 abs
2nd trim.)-PM2.B (p.a.): 0.48
4th quartile: 1.04 (0.70,1.57)
PM2.B abs
2nd trim.)—PM2.B (1st trim.): 0.53
Per 0.5 * 10B/m: 1.03 (0.82,1.28)
PM2.B abs
2nd trim.)—PM2.B (2nd trim.): 0.29
All trimesters adjusted simultaneously
PM2.6 abs
2nd trim.)-PM2 b (3,d trim ): 0.36
2nd quartile: 0.90 (0.52,1.58)
PM2.B abs
2nd trim.)—IMO2 (p.a.): 0.61
3rd quartile: 0.82 (0.45,1.31);
PM2.6 abs
2nd trim.)—IMO2 (1st trim.): 0.19
4th quartile: 0.88 (0.53,1.42)
PM2.B abs
2nd trim.)-l\l02 (2nd trim ): 0.85
Per 0.5 * 10B/m: 1.02 (0.77,1.29)
PM2.B abs
2nd trim.)—IMO2 (3,d trim.): 0.17
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
PM2.B abs
3,d trim.)—PM2.B (p.a.): 0.52
< 3000 g during exposure over second
trimester of pregnancy
PM2.B abs
3,d trim.)-PM2B (1st trim ): 0.51
Each trimester separately
PM2.B abs
3,d trim.)—PM2.B (2nd trim.): 0.41
2nd quartile: 1.33 (0.85, 2.22)
PM2.B abs
3,d trim.)—PM2.B (3,d trim.): 0.37
3rd quartile: 1.76(1.07,2.91);
PM2.B abs
3,d trim.)—NO2 (p.a.): 0.40
4th quartile: 1.83(1.11,2.81)
PM2.B abs
3,d trim.)—NO2 (1st trim.): -0.34
Per 0.5 * 10B/m: 1.27 (1.04,1.54)
PM2.B abs
3,d trim.)—NO2 (2nd trim.): 0.21
All trimesters adjusted simultaneously
PM2.B abs
3,d trim.)—NO2 (3,d trim.): 0.88
2nd quartile: 1.30 (0.77, 2.16)
3rd quartile: 1.63 (0.93, 2.73);
4th quartile: 1.99(1.12, 3.33)
July 2009
E-633
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Per 0.5* 10B/m: 1.21 (0.93,1.54)
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
< 3000 g during exposure over third
trimester of pregnancy
Each trimester separately
2nd quartile: 1.30 (0.85, 2.09)
3rd quartile: 0.92 (0.55,1.50);
4th quartile: 1.50(1.00, 2.27)
Per 0.5 * 10B/m: 1.20 (0.98,1.44)
All trimesters adjusted simultaneously
2nd quartile: 0.99 (0.64,1.62)
3rd quartile: 0.71 (0.40,1.20);
4th quartile: 1.14(0.68,1.91)
Per 0.5 * 10B/m: 1.15 (0.92,1.42)
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
< 3000 g during exposure over first
trimester of pregnancy
(adjustment for season of conception)
All trimesters adjusted simultaneously
4th quartile: 0.73 (0.38,1.38)
Per 0.5 * 10B/m: 0.93(0.41,1.32)
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
< 3000 g during exposure over second
trimester of pregnancy (adjustment for
season of conception)
All trimesters adjusted simultaneously
4th quartile: 2.45(1.22, 4.77)
Per 0.5 * 10B/m: 1.14(0.70,1.64)
Prevalence ratios (PRs) of birth weight
< 3000 g during exposure over third
trimester of pregnancy
(adjustment for season of conception)
All trimesters adjusted simultaneously
4th quartile: 1.19 (0.60, 2.48)
Per 0.5 * 10B/m: 1.29 (0.90,1.75)
Sensitivity analysis (bootstrapped PR)
2nd quartile: 1.19 (0.76,1.91)
3rd quartile: 1.52 (0.99, 2.34);
4th quartile: 1.62 (1.06, 2.55)
Per 0.5 * 10B/m: 1.35 (1.01,1.83)
Estimated increments in prevalence of
birth weight < 3000 g during
exposure 9 months after birth Per 0.5
* 10'6|m: 18% (-16%, 57%)
Reference: Wilhelm et al. (2005,
088668)
Outcome: Term low birth weight (LBW)
(<2500 g at a 37 completed weeks
gestation)
Period of Study: 1994-2000
Vaginal birth < 37 completed weeks
Location: Los Angeles County, California, gestation
U.S.
Age Groups: LBW: a 37 completed
weeks
Preterm births: <37 completed weeks
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24hr (every 3 days)
Entire pregnancy
Trimesters of pregnancy
Months of pregnancy
6 weeks before birth
PM Increment: 1) 10/yg/m3
2) 3 levels: a) < 25%ile (reference)
b) 25%-75%ile
c) > 75%ile
Incidence of LBW (third trimester
exposure)
July 2009
E-634
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Study Design: cross-sectional study
N: For LBW: 136,134
For preterm birth:
106,483
Statistical Analyses: Logistic regression
Covariates: Maternal age, maternal race,
maternal education, parity, interval since
previous live birth, level of prenatal care,
infant sex, previous LBW or preterm
infant, birth season, other pollutants (not
specified in birth weight analyses, also
adjusted for gestational age)
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: NR
Mean (SD): First trimester: 21.9
Third trimester: 21.0
6 weeks before birth: 21.0
Range (Min, Max):
First trimester: 11.8-38.9
Third trimester: 11.8-.38.9
6 weeks before birth: 9.9-48.5
Monitoring Stations:
Zip-code-level analysis: 9
Address-level analysis: 8
Copollutant (correlation): First trimester
PM2.B-C0: 0.57
PM2.B-N02: 0.73
PM2.B-03: -0.55
PM2.b-PMio: 0.43
Third trimester: PM2.B-C0: 0.67
PM2.B-N02: 0.78
PM2.B-03: -0.60
PM2.b-PMio: 0.52
6 weeks before birth: PM2.B-C0: 0.63
PM2.B-N02: 0.74
PM2.B-03: -0.60
PM2.b-PMio: 0.60
< 17.1 //g/m3: 2.4(2.0, 2.8)
17.1 to < 24.0//g/m3: 2.2 (2.0, 2.5)
a 24.0//g/m3: 2.1 (1.7, 2.4)
Incidence of preterm birth (first
trimester exposure)
< 18.0//g/m3: 10.6 (9.6,11.7)
18.0 to < 25.4//g/m3: 8.8 (8.1, 9.5)
a 25.4//g/m3: 9.0(8.1,10.0)
Incidence of preterm birth (6 weeks
before birth exposure)
< 16.5//g/m3: 8.2(7.4,9.1)
16.5 to < 24.7//g/m3: 8.8 (8.2, 9.4)
>24.7//g/m3: 9.6(8.7,10.5)
Outcome: Preterm birth
Exposure Period: First trimester of
pregnancy
Address-level analysis: Single-pollutant
model: Distance ~ 1 mile
Per 10//g/m3: 0.85 (0.70, 1.02)
18.1 to < 25.2//g/m3: 0.91 (0.72,1.16)
> 25.2//g/m3: 0.83 (0.60,1.14)
Single-pollutant model: 1 < distance ~ 2
mile
Per 10//g/m3: 0.85 (0.74,0.99)
18.3 to < 25.2//g/m3: 0.81 (0.69, 0.94)
>25.2//g/m3: 0.79 (0.65, 0.97)
Multipollutant modeM < distance ~ 2
mile
Per 10//g/m3: 1.18(0.84,1.65)
Single-pollutant model: 2 < distance ~ 4
mile
Per 10//g/m3: 0.83 (0.78, 0.88)
18.5 to < 24.9//g/m3: 0.79 (0.74, 0.85)
>24.9//g/m3: 0.76 (0.70, 0.84)
Zip-code-level analysis: Single-pollutant
model: Per 10//g/m3: 0.73 (0.67, 0.80)
18.0 to < 25.4//g/m3: 0.70 (0.61, 0.80)
a 25.4//g/m3: 0.64 (0.53, 0.76)
Outcome: Preterm birth
Exposure Period: 6 weeks before birth
Address-level analysis:
Single-pollutant model: Distance ~ 1 mile
Per 10//g/m3: 1.09 (0.91, 1.30)
16.8 to <24.1 //g/m3:1.21 (0.97,1.51)
> 24.1 //g/m3:1.25 (0.93, 1.68)
Single-pollutant model: 1 < distance ~ 2
mile
Per 10//g/m3: 1.08 (0.97, 1.21)
17.2 to < 24.5//g/m3: 0.94 (0.82,1.08)
July 2009
E-635
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
> 24.5//gfm3:1.04 (0.87,1.24)
Single-pollutant model: 2 < distance ~ 4
mile
Per 10//g/m3: 1.05 (0.99, 1.10)
17.3 to < 24.6//gfm3:1.06 (1.00, 1.13)
> 24.6//g/m3:1.08 (0.99, 1.17)
Zip-code-level analysis
Single-pollutant model: Per 10//g/m3:
1.10(1.00,1.21)
16.5 to < 24.7//g/m3:1.06 (0.94,1.20)
> 24.7//gfm3:1.19(1.02,1.40)
(See Notes1)
Multipollutant model
Per 10 //g/m3: 1.12(0.90,1.40)
> 24.6 //g/m3:1.12 (0.82, 1.52)
Notes:11n the table, the 75%ile is noted
as 24.7 //g|m3. However, the text notes
the 75%ile as 24.3//g|m3.
July 2009
E-636
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Woodruff et al. (2006,
088758)
Period of Study: 1999-2000
Location: California
Outcome (ICD10): SIDS (R95)
Respiratory mortality (J00-J99)
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (P27.1)
External accidents (V01-Y98)
Ill-defined and unspecified causes of
mortality (R99)
Age Groups: > 28 days old
Study Design: Matched case-control
(matched on date of birth and birth
weight)
N: 3877 infants
Statistical Analyses: Conditional logistic
regression
Covariates: Maternal race, education,
parity, age, marital status
Dose-response Investigated? Yes
Statistical Package: STATA
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24 hrs (every 6 days)
(time period between birth and post
neonatal death for the infant who died
and the same period for its four matched
surviving infants) Percentiles: Infants
who died of all causes (cases)
25th: 13.4
50th (Median): 19.2
75th: 23.6
Matched controls
25th: 13.5
50th (Median): 18.4
75th: 22.7
Monitoring Stations:
73 (from 39 counties)
PM Increment: 10/yg/m3
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]
lag:
All-cause mortality: Unadjusted: 1.15
(1.00,1.32)
Adjusted: 1.07 (0.93,1.24)
Cause-specific mortality: Respiratory (all):
Unadjusted: 2.15(1.15, 4.02)
Adjusted: 2.13(1.12,4.05)
Respiratory (excluding deaths due to
BPD): Adjusted: 1.42 (0.66, 3.03)
Respiratory (BPD alone): Unadjusted: 6.00
(1.40, 27.76)
Respiratory (low birth weight infants
only): Unadjusted: 3.09 (1.14, 8.40)
Respiratory (normal birth weight infants
only): Unadjusted: 1.66 (0.74, 3.70)
Respiratory (with matched PM2.6 averaged
over all monitors in county)
Adjusted: 2.28 (0.94, 5.52)
Respiratory (averaging all PM2.6
measurements in county over the 2-year
study period): Adjusted: 2.26 (0.83, 6.21)
SIDS: Unadjusted: 0.86 (0.61,1.22)
Adjusted: 0.82 (0.55,1.23)
SIDS (includes ICD10 code R99: ill-defined
and unspecified causes of mortality):
Adjusted: 1.03 (0.79,1.35)
External causes: Unadjusted: 0.91 (0.56,
1.47)
Adjusted: 0.83 (0.50,1.39)
Compare against the lowest quartile,
estimates for respiratory-specific
mortality were provided: 2nd quartile: 1.28
(0.47,3.51)
3,d quartile: 1.75(0.65, 4.72)
4th quartile: 2.35 (0.85, 6.54)
July 2009
E-637
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Woodruff et al. (2008,
098386)
Period of Study: 1999-2002
Location: US counties with >250,000
residents (96 counties)
All other deaths evaluated as a control
category
Age Groups: Infants aged > 28 days and
<1 yr
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 3,583,495 births (6,639 post neonatal
deaths)
Statistical Analyses: Logistic GEE
(exchangeable correlation structure)
Covariates: maternal race/ethnicity,
marital status, age, education, primiparity,
county-level poverty and per capita
income levels, year and month of birth
dummy variables to account for time trend
and seasonal effects, and region of the
country
sensitivity analyses performed among only
those mothers with smoking information
(adjustment for smoking had no effect on
the estimates)
Season: Adjusted for year and month of
birth dummy variables to account for time
trend and seasonal effects
Dose-response Investigated? Evaluated
the appropriateness of a linear form from
analysis based on quartiles of exposure
and concluded that linear form was
appropriate (data not shown)
Statistical Package: SAS
'All units expressed in //gfm3 unless otherwise specified.
Outcome (ICD10): Postneonatal deaths:
Respiratory mortality (J000-99, plus
bronchopulmonary dysplasia [BPD] P27.1)
SIDS (R95)
Ill-defined causes (R99)
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: Measured continuously
for 24 h once every 6 days
exposure assigned by calculating avg
concentration of pollutant during first 2
months of life
Median and IQR (25th-75th percentile):
Survivors: 14.8(11.7-18.7)
All causes of death: 14.9 (12.0-18.6)
Respiratory: 14.8(11.5-18.5)
SIDS: 14.5(12.0-17.5)
SIDS + ill-defined: 14.8(12.1-18.5)
Other causes: 14.9 (12.0-18.6)
Percentiles: See above
PM Component: Not assessed, but
controlled for region of the country to
account for PM composition variation
Monitoring Stations: NR
Copollutant (correlation):
PMio (r - 0.34)
PM2.6
CO (r - 0.35)
SO2 (r - 0.21)
O3 (r - -0.10)
Notes: Monthly averages calculated if
there were at least 3 available measures
for PM
Assigned exposures using the avg
concentration of the county of residence
PM Increment: IQR (7/yglm3)
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Adjusted ORs for single pollutant models
All causes: 1.04 (0.98,1.11)
Respiratory: 1.11 (0.96,1.29)
SIDS: 1.01 (0.86,1.20)
Ill-defined + SIDS: 1.06(0.97,1.17)
Other causes: 1.03 (0.96,1.12)
Adjusted ORs for multipollutant models
(including CO, O3, SO2)
Respiratory: 1.05 (0.89,1.24)
SIDS: 1.04 (0.87,1.23)
OR for respiratory deaths assessing
exposure as quartiles
Highest vs Lowest quartile: 1.39 (1.04,
1.85)
July 2009
E-638
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
E.9. Long-Term Exposure and Mortality
Table E-31. Long-term exposure - mortality - PM10.
Reference: (Breitner et al„ 2009,
188439)
Period of Study: 10/1 /1991 to
313112002
Location: Efurt, Germany
Design & Methods
Outcome: Mortality, excluding infants
and ICD-9 > 800
Study Design: Time-series
Covariates: seasonal and weekday
variations, influenza epidemics, air
temperature, relative humidity
Statistical Analysis: semiparametric
Poisson regression, polynomial distributed
lag (PDL)
Statistical Package: R
Age Groups: All
Concentrations' ~
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: daily
Mean (SD) Unit:
1 (10/1/1991-8/31/1995): 50.6 ± 32.2
Z^g/m3
2(9/1/1995-2/28/19981:41.1 ± 28.4
/yg/m3
3(3/1/1998-3/31/20021:24.3 ± 15.4
/yg/m3
Total: 38.0 ±28.3/yg/m3
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant: NO2, CO, UFP
__Effect_EstimatesJ95%_CI)__
Increment: IQR
Relative Risk (95% CI)
Lag
New City Limits
6-day IQR: 17.2
PDL: 0.997 (0.972-1.022)
Mean of lags 0-5: 0.995 (0.971-1.019)
Old City Limits
6-day IQR: 17.2
PDL: 1.004 (0.978-1.031)
Mean of lags 0-5: 1.001 (0.976-1.027)
New City Limits
15-day IQR: 14.5
PDL: 1.008 (0.982-1.036)
Mean of lags 0-14: 1.006(0.981-1.032)
Old City Limits
15-day IQR: 14.5
PDL: 1.019(0.991-1.048)
Mean of lags 0-14: 1.017(0.990-1.044)
Multiday Moving Averages, 6-day
Overall IQR: 24.2
Overall RR (95% CI): 0.998 (0.976-
1.021)
Period 1: 0.996 (0.969-1.024)
Period 2: 1.013 (0.972-1.056)
Period 3: 0.949 (0.897-1.004)
Multiday Moving Averages, 15-day
Overall IQR: 22.3
Overall RR (95% CI): 1.020 (0.993-
1.093)
Period 1: 1.017 (0.984-1.051)
Period 2: 1.012(0.973-1.071)
Period 3: 0.978(0.911-1.051)
July 2009
E-639
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table E-32. Long-term exposure - mortality - PMio2.5.
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: (Chen et al., 2005, 087942)
Period of Study: 1973-1998
Outcome: Mortality: CHD
Study Design: Cohort
Location: San Francisco, San Diego, Los Statistical Analyses: Cox proportion
Angeles, CA hazards model
Age Groups: >25
Pollutant: PMio-2.5
Averaging Time: 25 years
Mean (SD): 25.4
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant: NO2
0s
SO?
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Relative Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag: Males
PMio-2.5: 0.93 (0.68,1.29)
0-1
PMio-2.5+NO2: 0.86 (0.62,1.20)
0-1
PMio-2.5+SO2: 0.90 (0.64,1.27)
0-1
PMio.2.5+03: 1.01 (0.67,1.51)
0-1
Females
PMio-2.5:1.20 (0.95,1.53)
0-1
PMio-2.5+NO2:1.19 (0.92,1.54)
0-1
PM10.2.5+SO2:1.31 (1.03,1.68)
0-1
PMio-2.5+0s: 1.47 (1.10,1.96)
0-1
Reference: Goss et al. (2004, 055624)
Period of Study: 1999-2000
Location: United States
Outcome: Mortality
Study Design: Cohort Study (Cystic
Fibrosis Cohort)
Statistical Analyses: Logistic
Regression
Age Groups: >6 yrs
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: Annual avg
Mean (SD) unit: PM2.6: 13.7(4.2)
IQR: PM2 b: 11.8-15.9
Copollutant: O3
NO2
SO2
CO
Increment: 10 //g/m3
PM2.E: 1.32 (0.91 - 1.93)
Reference: (Lipfert et al., 2006,
189271)
Period of Study: 1989-1996
Location: Various parts of the Untied
States
Outcome: Mortality
Study Design: Retrospective Cohort
Statistical Analyses: Cox proportional
hazards regression
Age Groups: Male US veterans between
ages of 39 and 63 (Avg. age: 51)
Pollutant: PMio-2.5
Mean (SD): 16.0 (5.1
Increment: 12
1.07 (1.01,1.13)
Reference: McDonnell et al. (2000,
Outcome: Mortality
Pollutant: PMio-2.5
Increment: IQR
010319)
Study Design: Cohort (AHSM0G airport
Averaging Time: monthly averages
All Cause: 1.05 (0.92-1.20)
Period of Study: 1973-1977
cohort)
Mean (SD): PMio-2.5: 27.3 (8.6)
Resp: 1.19(0.88,1.62)
Location: California
Statistical Analyses: Cox regression
models
IQR: 9.7
Lung Cancer: 1.25 (0.63-2.49)
Age Groups: Males, 27 yrs +
Copollutant: O3: 0.70
SO2: 0.31
NO2: 0.23
SO4: 0.47
'All units expressed in //gfm3 unless otherwise specified.
July 2009
E-640
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Table E-33. Long-term exposure - mortality - PM2.5 (including PM components/sources).
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Abrahamowicz et al. (2003,
086292)
Period of Study: 1982-1989
Location: 151 Cities
Outcome: Mortality: All-causes
Study Design: Case-cohort study
Statistical Analyses: Cox proportion-
hazards model flexible regression spline
generalization
Age Groups: >18
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: Annual
Mean (SD): 18.2
Range (Min, Max): (9.0, 33.5)
Copollutant: Sulfates
Relative Risk (Min CI, Max CI)
Estimated from graph (Figure 1): log
HR for a 24.5//g|m3 increase in PM2.6
over time
Years
0: 0.5(-1.1,1.6)
2: 0.6 (0.2, 0.9)
4: 0.6 (0.3, 0.8)
6: 0.8(0.3,1.1)
8:-1.0 (-1.5,1.0)
Reference: Abrahamowicz et al. (2003,
086292)
Period of Study: 1982-1989
Location: 151 Cities
Outcome: Mortality: All-causes
Study Design: Case-cohort study
Statistical Analyses: Cox proportion-
hazards model flexible regression spline
generalization
Age Groups: >18
Pollutant: Sulfates
Averaging Time: Annual
Mean (SD): 18.2
Range (Min, Max): (9.0, 33.5)
Copollutant: PM2.6
Relative Risk (Min CI, Max CI)
Estimated from graph (Figure 1): Log
HR for a 19.9//g|m3 increase in Sulfates
over time
Years
0: 0.1 (-0.2, 0.7)
2: 0.1 (-0.2, 0.4)
4: 0.0 (-0.4, 0.3)
6: 0.3 (-0.1, 0.5)
8: 0.4(-0.4,1.6)
Reference: Ballester et al. (2008,
Outcome: Mortality- All-causes
Pollutant: PM2.6
Potential Reduction in the total
189977)
burden of mortality (min CI, max CI)
Study Design: Health Impact
Averaging Time: Annual
for four different decreases in annual
Period of Study: 2001-2002
Assessment
Mean (SD): NR
PM2.5 using a conservative estimate
Location: Europe
Statistical Analyses: Aphesis Network
Range (Min, Max): NR
Reduction to 25/yg/m3 ¦ 0.4 (0.1, 0.8)
Age Groups: >30
Reduction to 20 //g|m3 ¦ 0.8 (0.2,1.6)
Reduction to 15/yg/m3 ¦ 1.6 (0.4, 3.1)
Reduction to 10 /yg/m3 ¦ 3.0 (0.8, 5.8)
July 2009
E-641
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Beelen et al. (2008,156263)
Period of Study: 1987-1996
Location: Netherlands
Outcome: Mortality: Total (non-
accidental) (< 800)
Cardiorespiratory (390-448,490-496,
487, 480-486, 507)
Pulmonary (460-519)
Cardiovascular (400-440)
Lung Cancer (162)
Other-causes
Study Design: Case-cohort study and
prospective cohort
Statistical Analyses: Cox proportion-
hazards model
Age Groups: 55-69
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: Annual
Mean (SD): 28.3 (2.1)//g/m3
Range (Min, Max): (23.0, 36.8)
Copollutant (correlation): NO2: (>0.8)
BS: (>0.8)
SO2: (>0.6)
Increment: 11 /yglm3
Relative Risk (Min CI, Max CI)
RR for the association between
exposures to PM2.5 and cause specific
mortality
Natural Cause: Full cohort: 1.06 (0.97,
1.16)
Case cohort: 0.86 (0.66,1.13)
Cardiovascular: Full cohort: 1.04 (0.90,
1.21)
Case cohort: 0.83 (0.60,1.15)
Respiratory: Full cohort: 1.07 (0.75,
1.52)
Case cohort: 1.02 (0.56,1.88)
Lung Cancer: Full cohort: 1.06 (0.82,
1.38)
Case cohort: 0.87 (0.52,1.47)
Other cause: Full cohort: 1.08 (0.96,
1.23)
Case cohort: 0.85 (0.65,1.12)
RR for the association between
exposures to BS and cause specific
mortality
Natural Cause: Full cohort: 1.05 (1.00,
1.11)
Case cohort: 0.97 (0.83,1.13)
Cardiovascular: Full cohort: 1.04 (0.95,
1.13)
Case cohort: 0.98 (0.81,1.18)
Respiratory: Full cohort: 1.22 (0.99,
1.50)
Case cohort: 1.29 (0.91,1.83)
Lung Cancer: Full cohort: 1.03 (0.88,
1.20)
Case cohort: 1.03 (0.77,1.38)
Other cause: Full cohort: 1.04 (0.97,
1.12)
Case cohort: 0.91 (0.78,1.07)
July 2009
E-642
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Breitner et al. (2009,
188439)
Period of Study: 10/1 /1991 to
313112002
Location: Efurt, Germany
Covariates: seasonal and weekday
variations, influenza epidemics, air
temperature, relative humidity
Outcome: Mortality, excluding infants
and ICD-9 > 800
Study Design: Time-series
1/1991-8/31/1995): 50.6 ± 32.2 New City Limits
6-day IQR: 13.3
2(9/1/1995-2/28/19981:41.1 ± 28.4
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: daily
Mean (SD) Unit:
Increment: IQR
Relative Risk (95% CI)
Lag
Statistical Analysis: semiparametric ^ I"1!;1
Poisson regression, polynomial distributed ^m
PDL: 1.009 (0.984-1.035)
Mean of lags 0-5: 1.004 (0.981-1.027)
Old City Limits
6-day IQR: 13.3
PDL: 1.017 (0.990-1.044)
Mean of lags 0-5: 1.010(0.986-1.035)
lag (PDL)
3(3/1/1998-3/31/20021:24.3 ± 15.4
Z^g/m3
Total: 38.0 ±28.3/yg/m3
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant: NO2, CO, UFP
Statistical Package: R
Age Groups: All
New City Limits
15-day IQR: 11.5
PDL: 1.019(0.988-1.050)
Mean of lags 0-14: 1.017(0.992-1.042)
Old City Limits
15-day IQR: 11.5
PDL: 1.030 (0.997-1.063)
Mean of lags 0-14: 1.025(0.999-1.052)
Multiday Moving Averages, 6-day
Overall IQR: 13.3
Overall RR (95% CI): 1.004 (0.981-
1.027)
Period 1: NR
Period 2: 1.017 (0.990-1.044)
Period 3: 0.974 (0.937-1.013)
Multiday Moving Averages, 15-day
Overall IQR: 11.5
Overall RR (95% CI): 1.017 (0.992-
1.042)
Period 1: NR
Period 2: 1.016(0.988-1.045)
Period 3: 1.016(0.971-1.063)
July 2009
E-643
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Brunekreef et al. (2009,
191947)
Period of Study: 1987-1996
Location: The Netherlands
Outcome: All cause mortality (ICD-9
400440,460-519, > 800)
Study Design: Case-cohort
Covariates
Individual: sex, age, Quetelet index,
smoking status, passive smoking status,
educational level, occupation,
occupational exposure, marital status,
alcohol use, intake of vegetables, fruits,
energy, saturatured and monounsaturated
fatty acids, trans fatty acids, total fiver,
folic acid and fish
Area-level: Percent of population with
income below the 40th percentile and
above the 80th percentile
Statistical Analysis: Cox proportional
hazards
Statistical Package: Stata, SPSS, R
Age Groups: 120,000 adults aged 55-69
years at enrollment
Pollutant: PM2.6, estimated from PM10
levelsf
Averaging Time: 24hr
50"1 Percentile: 28 /yglm3
Range (Min, Max): 23-37
Copollutant (correlation):
NO2: 0.75
Black Smoke: 0.84
NO: 0.69
SO2: 0.43
Increment: 10//gfm3
Relative Risk (95 % CI) for PM2.5
concentrations and cause specific
mortality
Case Cohort
Natural Cause: 0.86 (0.66-1.13)
Cardiovascular: 0.83(0.60-1.15)
Respiratory: 1.02 (0.56-1.88)
Lung Cancer: 0.87 (0.52-1.47)
Noncardiopulmonary, non-lung cancer:
0.85(0.65-1.23)
Full Cohort
Natural Cause: 1.06 (0.97-1.16)
Cardiovascular: 1.04 (0.90-1.21)
Respiratory: 1.07 (0.75-1.52)
Lung Cancer: 1.06 (0.82-1.38)
Noncardiopulmonary, non-lung cancer:
1.08(0.72-1.19)
Relative Risk (95%CI) for PM2.6
concentrations and cause specific
mortality in full cohort analysis by
confounder model
Natural Cause Mortality
Unadjusted: 1.11 (1.04-1.20)
Smoking: 1.04 (0.96-1.13)
Smoking, area-level income: 1.06 (0.97-
1.16)
Cardiovascular Mortality
Unadjusted: 1.09 (0.97-1.23)
Smoking: 1.02 (0.90-1.16)
Smoking, area-level income: 1.04 (0.90-
1.21)
Respiratory Mortality
Unadjusted: 1.23 (0.92-1.65)
Smoking: 1.10 (0.81-1.50)
Smoking, area-level income: 1.07 (0.75-
1.52)
Lung Cancer Mortality
Unadjusted: 1.17 (0.95-1.46)
Smoking: 1.06 (0.85-1.33)
Smoking, area-level income: 1.06 (0.82-
1.38)
Noncardiopulmonary, Non-Lung Cancer
Mortality
Unadjusted: 1.10 (1.00-1.22)
Smoking: 1.05 (0.94-1.16)
Smoking, area-level income: 1.08 (0.96-
1.22)
July 2009
E-644
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Chen et al. (2005, 087942)
Outcome: Mortality: CHD
Pollutant: PM2.6
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Period of Study: 1973-1998
Study Design: Cohort
Averaging Time: 25 years
Relative Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
Location: San Francisco, San Diego, Los
Statistical Analyses: Cox proportion
Mean (SD): 29.0
lag: Males
Angeles, CA
hazards model
Range (Min, Max): NR
PM2.6: 0.89 (0.69,1.17)
Age Groups: >25
Copollutant: NO2, O3, SO2
0-1
PM2.B+NO2: 0.82 (0.61,1.10): 0-1
PM2.6+SO2: 0.86 (0.65,1.14)
0-1
PM2.B+03:0.92 (0.65,1.29)
0-1
Females
PM2 b: 1.19 (0.96,1.47)
0-1
PM2.B+NO2:1.18(0.95,1.47): 0-1
PM2.B+SO2:1.36 (1.05,1.74)
0-1
PM2.B+O3:1.61 (1.17,2.22)
0-1
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Increase in Mortality for overall
exposure period and individual year
(95%CI Min, 95%CI Max):
ACS (adjusted for age, sex)
Overall: 10.8 (8.6,13.0)
2000:10.9(7.3,14.6)
2001:9.1 (5.3,12.7)
2002: 10.1 (6.0,14.3)
SCS (adjusted for age, sex)
Overall: 20.8 (14.8, 27.1)
2000: 17.8(9.8, 26.4)
2001: 16.5(7.4,25.0)
2002: 33.5(19.2, 49.3)
Reference: Eftim et al. (2008, 099104)
Period of Study: 2000-2002
Location: USA, Same cities as six cities
and ACS cohorts
Outcome (ICD-9): All non-accidental
causes (< 800)
Study Design: Cross-sectional
Statistical Analyses: Log-linear
regression, Poisson
Age Groups: >65
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: Annual avg
Mean (SD): |
ACS: 13.6 (2.8)
SCS: 14.1 (3.1)
Range (Min, Max): ACS: (6.0, 25.1
SCS: (9.6,19.1)
July 2009
E-645
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Enstrom et al. (2005,
087356)
Period of Study: 1973-2002
Location: 25 California Colonies
11 California Colonies (EPA IPN study)
Outcome: Mortality: Cardiovascular-
respiratory (390-448)
(480-486, 487, 490-496, 507)
Study Design: Retrospective cohort
Statistical Analyses: Cox proportional
hazards regression model, SAS PHREG
Age Groups: 35 or older
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: Annual
Mean (SD): 23.4
Range (Min, Max): (13.1 /yglm3, 36.1)
Relative Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
RR from causes for both sexes by
county from 1973-2002
Alameda: 0.962 (0.926,0.999)
Butte: 0.999 (0.910,1.096)
Contra Costa: 0.999 (0.943,1.058)
Fresno: 0.935 (0.872,1.002)
Humboldt: 0.992 (0.900,1.092)
Kern: 0.944(0.872,1.023)
Marin: 0.939 (0.867,1.016)
Napa: 0.949 (0.868,1.038)
Orange: 0.990 (0.948,1.034)
Riverside: 0.959 (0.906,1.015)
Sacramento: 0.998 (0.944,1.055)
San Bernardino: 0.992 (0.938,1.049)
San Diego: 0.992 (0.954,1.033)
San Francisco: 0.963 (0.914,1.014)
San Joaquin: 0.925 (0.816,1.049)
San Mateo: 0.949 (0.899,1.003)
Santa Barbara: 0.968 (0.878,1.068)
Santa Clara: 0.955 (0.910,1.003)
Santa Cruz: 0.890 (0.793,0.999)
Solano: 0.901 (0.815,0.995)
Sonoma: 0.968 (0.884,1.060)
Stanislaus: 0.984 (0.904,1.072)
Tulare: 1.047 (0.979,1.119)
Ventura: 0.967(0.872,1.072)
RR from all causes for 11 counties for
both sexes (EPA IPN study)
Santa Barbara: 0.968 (0.878,1.068)
Contra Costa: 0.999 (0.943,1.058)
Alameda: 0.962 (0.926,0.999)
Butte: 0.999 (0.910,1.096)
San Francisco: 0.963 (0.914,1.014)
Santa Clara: 0.955 (0.910,1.003)
Fresno: 0.935 (0.872,1.002)
San Diego: 0.992 (0.954,1.033)
Kern: 0.944(0.872,1.023)
Riverside: 0.959 (0.906,1.015)
July 2009
E-646
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Filleul et al. (2005, 087357) Outcome: Non-accidental causes
(< 800), cardiopulmonary disease (401-
Period of Study: 1974-1976
Location: 7 cities in France
440 and 460-519), lung cancer (162)
Age Groups: 25-59 years
Study Design: Cohort
N: 14,284 people
Statistical Analyses: Cox proportional
hazard, regression
Covariates: Sex, smoking habits,
educational level, body-mass index (BMI),
occupational exposure
Statistical Package: Proc
SAS
Pollutant: Total suspended particles
(TSP)
Averaging Time: NR
Mean (SD): NR
Range (Min, Max): (45, 243)
PM Component: NR
Monitoring Stations: 1 station
Copollutant (correlation): BS
r - 0.87
SO?
r - 0.17
NO
r - 0.84
NO?
r - 0.60
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Adjusted mortality rate ratios: 24 areas:
All non-accidental causes: 1.00(0.99,
1.01]
Lung cancer: 0.97(0.94,1.01]
Cardiopulmonary disease: 1.01(0.99,
1.03]
18 areas: All non-accidental causes:
1.05(1.02,1.08]
Lung cancer: 1.00(0.92,1.10]
Cardiopulmonary disease: 1.06(1.01,
1.12]
Reference: Fuentes et al. (2006,
097647)
Period of Study: June 2000
Location: Conterminous U.S.
Outcome: Mortality:
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Generalized
Poisson Regression
Age Groups: 0-14,15-64, >65
Covariates: temperature, pressure, dew
point, wind speed, elevation, age,
ethnicity
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: monthly
Mean (SD): 6.60 (0.76)
Copollutant: PMio, 0:i
Increment: 10 //g/m3
PMib: 1.066 (1.064,1.069)
PMio: 1.030 (1.028,1.032)
July 2009
E-647
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Janes et al. (2007, 090927) Outcome: Mortality:
Period of Study: 2000 to 2002
Location: 113 US counties
Study Design: Time-series
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: Annual Avg
Statistical Analyses: Cox proportional Mean (SD): NR
hazards model
Range (Min, Max): NR
Age Groups: 65-74
75-84
85 +
Increment: 1 //gf'nr1
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag: Overall % Increase by age-sex
stratum
Age Category
65-74: Male: 1.48 (0.93,2.03)
Female: 0.83(0.24,1.43)
75-84: Male: 0.85 (0.34,1.35)
Female: 0.77(0.28,1.27)
85 + : Male: 0.70 (0.03,1.38)
Female: 0.59(0.05,1.12)
National Trend % Increase by age-sex
stratum
Age Category
65-74: Male: 3.55 (2.77,4.34)
Female: 1.97(1.12,2.83)
75-84: Male: 2.48 (1.83,3.14)
Female: 2.29(1.66,2.93)
85 + : Male: 1.38 (0.52,2.26)
Female: 1.65(1.01,2.29)
Local Trend % Increase by age-sex
stratum
Age Category
65-74: Male: 0.04 (-0.58,0.67)
Female:-0.03 (-0.71,0.66)
75-84: Male:-0.34 (-0.87,0.19)
Female:-0.31 (-0.82, 0.21)
85 + : Male: <0.01 (-0.71,0.73)
Female:-0.22 (-0.74,0.31)
"Local trends are county specific
deviations from national trends
Reference: Jerrett et al. (2003, 087380) Outcome: Mortality
Period of Study: 1982
Location: 151 cities from ACS
Study Design: multilevel, individual-
ecologic analysis
Statistical Analysis: Cox proportional
hazards model
Covariates: Smoking, education,
occupational exposures, BMI, marital
status, alcohol consumption, gender
Pollutant: Sulfates
Mean (SD): 10.6
Range (Min, Max): 3.6,23.5
Increment: 19.9 (Range)
All Cause: SO4:1.17 (1.07, 1.27)
S04 + CO: 1.16 (1.10,1.23)
S04 + NO?: 1.16(1.08,1.24)
S04 + 0s: 1.17 (1.11,1.24)
SO4 + SO2: 1.05 (0.98,1.12)
CPD: SO4: 1.25 (1.16,1.35)
S04 +CO: 1.28 (1.18,1.39)
S04 + NO?: 1.29(1.17,1.42)
S04 + 0s: 1.27 (1.17,1.38)
SO4 + SO2: 1.13 (1.03,1.24)
Lung Cancer: SO4: 1.31 (1.09,1.58)
S04 +CO: 1.26 (1.03,1.53)
S04 + NO2: 1.31 (1.05,1.65)
SO4 + O3: 1.30 (1.07,1.59)
S04 + SO2: 1.37 (1.08,1.73)
July 2009
E-648
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Jerrett et al. (2005, 087600) Outcome: Mortality: Non- accidental
(< 800)
Period of Study: 1982-2000
Location: Los Angeles, California
IHD (410-414)
Cardiopulmonary (400-440,460-519)
Lung Cancer (162)
Other Cancers (140-149,160, 161,163-
239)
Other causes
Study Design: Retrospective Cohort
Statistical Analyses: Cox regression
hazards model
kriging, radial basis function multiquadric
interpolator
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: Annual avg
Mean (SD): NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant: 0:i
Increment: 10/yg/m3
Relative Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
All Causes-PM2.b Only: 1.24 (1.11,1.37)
44 Ind. Covariates together+PIVh.B: 1.17
(1.03.1.32)
44 Ind. Covariates together+ PM2.6+O3:
1.20(1.07,1.34)
44 Ind. Covariates together+intersection
within freeways within 500 m +
PM2.B+O3:1.17 (1.05,1.31)
IHD ¦ PM2.B Only: 1.49 (1.20,1.85)
44 Ind. Covariates together+PM2.6: 1.39
(1.12,1.73)
44 Ind. Covariates together+PM2.B+O3:
1.45(1.15,1.82)
44 Ind. Covariates together+intersection
within freeways within 500 m +
PM2.B+O3:1.38 (1.11,1.72)
Cardiopulmonary - PM2.6 Only: 1.20
(1.04,1.39)
44 Ind. Covariates together+ PM2.6+O3:
1.19(1.02,1.38)
44 Ind. Covariates together+intersection
within freeways within 500 m +
PM2.B+O3:1.13 (0.97,1.31)
Lung Cancer - PM2.6 Only: 1.60
(1.09.2.33)
44 Ind. Covariates together+PM2.6: 1.44
(0.98,2.11)
44 Ind. Covariates together+intersection
within freeways within 500 m +
PM2.B+O3:1.46 (0.99,2.16)
Other Cancers ¦ PM2.6 Only: 1.09
(0.85,1.40)
44 Ind. Covariates together+ PM2.6+O3:
1.08(0.83,1.39)
44 Ind. Covariates together+intersection
within freeways within 500 m +
PM2.B+O3:1.08 (0.83,1.39)
All Other Causes ¦ PM2.6 Only: 1.11
(0.74,1.67)
44 Ind. Covariates together+ PM2.6+O3:
0.95(0.64,1.39)
44 Ind. Covariates together+intersection
within freeways within 500 m +
PM2.B+O3:1.02 (0.71,1.48)
July 2009
E-649
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Laden et al. (2006, 087605)
Period of Study: 1974-1998
Period 1: 1974-1989
Period 2: 1990-1998
Location: Nine US Cities
Watertown, MA
Kingston, TN
Harriman, TN
St. Louis, M0
Steubenville, OH
Portage, Wl
| Wyocena, Wl
Pardeeville, Wl
Topeka, KS
Outcome: Total mortality
Non-accidental (< 800)
Cardiovascular (400-440)
Respiratory (485-496)
Lung Cancer (162)
Other
Study Design: Prospective Cohort
Statistical Analyses: Cox proportional
hazards regression
Age Groups: 25-74
Pollutant: PM2.B
Averaging Time: Annual avg
Mean (SD): Period 1
Portage: 11.4
Topeka: 12.4
Watertown: 15.4
Harriman: 20.9
St Louis: 19.2
Steubenville: 29.0
Period 2
Portage: 10.2
Topeka: 13.1
Watertown: 12.1
Harriman: 18.1
St. Louis: 13.4
Steubenville: 22.0
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Relative Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
lag:
Period 1: Portage: 1.00
Topeka: 1.06 (0.86,1.31)
Watertown: 1.06 (0.87,1.28)
Harriman: 1.19(0.98,1.44)
St Louis: 1.15 (0.96,1.38)
Steubenville: 1.31 (1.10,1.57)
Period 2: Portage: NR
Topeka: 1.01 (0.83,1.22)
Watertown: 0.82 (0.67,1.00)
Harriman: 1.10 (0.91,1.33)
St Louis: 0.96 (0.80,1.15)
Steubenville: 1.06 (0.89,1.27)
Complete Period: Portage: 1.00
Topeka: 1.03 (0.89,1.19)
Watertown: 0.95 (0.83,1.08)
Harriman: 1.15(1.01,1.32)
St. Louis: 1.05 (0.93,1.20)
Steubenville: 1.18(1.04,1.34)
RR for complete follow up Avg. PM2.6
Total Mortality: 1.16 (1.07,1.26)
Cardiovascular: 1.28(1.13,1.44)
Respiratory: 1.08 (0.79,1.49)
Lung Cancer: 1.27 (0.96,1.69)
Other: 1.02 (0.90,1.17)
RR for period one Avg. PM2.6
Total Mortality: 1.18 (1.09,1.27)
Cardiovascular: 1.28 (1.14,1.43)
Respiratory: 1.21 (0.89,1.66)
Lung Cancer: 1.20 (0.91,1.58)
Other: 1.05 (0.93,1.19)
Decrease in Avg. PM2.6 over the two
periods
Total Mortality: 0.73 (0.57, 0.95)
Cardiovascular: 0.69 (0.46,1.01)
Respiratory: 0.43 (0.16,1.13)
Lung Cancer: 1.06 (0.43, 2.62)
Other: 0.85 (0.56,1.27)
Reference: Lipfert et al. (2006, 088756) Outcome: Mortality
Period of Study: 1989-1996 Study Design: Retrospective Cohort
Pollutant: Sulfate
Mean (SD) from 1976-81:10.7 (3.6)
Increment: 8
1.045 (0.944,1.157)
Location: Various parts of the Untied
States
Statistical Analyses: Cox proportional
hazards regression
Age Groups: Male US veterans between
ages of 39 and 63 (Avg. age: 51)
July 2009
E-650
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Lipfert et al. (2006, 088756)
Outcome: Mortality
Pollutant: PM2.6
Increment: 8
Period of Study: 1989-1996
Study Design: Retrospective Cohort
Mean (SD): 14.3 (3.2)
1.118(1.038,1.203)
Location: Various parts of the Untied
Statistical Analyses: Cox proportional
States
hazards regression
Age Groups: Male US veterans between
ages of 39 and 63 (Avg age 51)
July 2009
E-651
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Lipfert et al. (2006, 088218) Outcome: Mortality: Non- accidental
(< 800)
Period of Study: 1997-2002
Location: Various parts of the Untied
States
Study Design: Retrospective cohort
Statistical Analyses: Cox proportional
hazards regression
AIC
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: Annual avg
Mean (SD): 15.02 (4.80)//g/m3 (2000-
2003)
Range (Min, Max): (3.29, 24.96)
Copollutant (correlation): As:
Age Groups: Male US veterans between r - 0.443
ages of 39 and 63 (Avg. age: 51)
Cr: r - 0.379
Cu: r - 0.530
Fe: r - 0.379;
Pb: r - 0.489
Mn: r - 0.389;
Ni: r - 0.140
Se: r - 0.312;
V: r - 0.197
Zn: r - 0.420;
0C:r - 0.620
EC: r - 0.544; |
S(k r - 0.827
NOs: r - 0.649
NO?: r - 0.641
Peak CO: r - 0.040
Peak 0s: r - 0.222
Peak SO2: r - 0.714
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Increase per 10//g/m3 increase in
PM2.6
Single-Pollutant Model
As:-5.23%
Cr: -2.11%
Cu: 2.12%
Fe: 2.81%
Pb: -2.40%
Mn: -1.20%
Ni: 3.75%
Se: -0.30%
V: 5.08%
Zn: 1.52%
0C:-0.02%
EC: 9.16%
SO4: 3.04%
NOs: 6.60%
NO?: 6.92%
Peak CO:-0.61%
Peak O3: 4.95%
Peak SO2: -4.20%
Multiple Pollutants model- Pollutant
with traffic density
NOs: 3.42%
SO4: -2.73%
EC: 6.27%
Ni: 2.51%
V: 3.27%
Pollutant with NO3
EC: 5.93%
Ni: 2.31%
V: 3.11%
Pollutant with Peak O3
Traffic density: 2.40%
EC: 10.79%
Fe: 5.94%
NOs: 7.57%
PM2.6: 8.97%
V: 4.93%
Ni: 3.65%
SO4: 6.75%
Cu: 1.55%
0C: 0.21%
July 2009
E-652
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Krewski et al. (2009,
191193)
Period of Study: 1979-2000
Location: 48 contiguous states US
Outcome: Death
Study Design: cohort
Covariates: demographic, socioeconomic
and ecologic characteristics
Statistical Analysis: Cox proportional-
hazards model
Statistical Package: NR
Age Groups: Adults of at least 30 years
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: NR
Mean Unit:
1979-1983: 21.20//gfm3
1999-2000: 14.02 //g/m3
Range (Min, Max):
1979-1983: 10.77-30.01
1999-2000: 5.80-22.20
Copollutant: SO42, SO2, PMib, TSP, O3,
no2,co
Increment: 10//gfm3
Hazard Ratio (95% CI)
MSA&DIFF
Increment Change: 10.78 (1.043-1.115)
Change 5-15//gfm3: 1.128 (1.077-1.183)
Change 10-20/yglm3: 1.079 (1.048-
1.112)
HR (95% CI)
Los Angeles
Parsimonious ecologic covariates: 1.126
(1.014-1.251)
HR (95% CI)
15 year time window
Group A: 0.98 (0.92-1.06)
Group B: 1.01 (0.99-1.02)
HR (95% CI)
Third follow-up, 7 Ecologic Variables
1979-1983: 1.044(1.028-1.060)
1999-2000: 1.057 (1.036-1.079)
HR (95% CI)
Nationwide analysis, 1999-2000
Standard Cox: 1.03 (1.01-1.05)
Random Effects Cox: 1.06 (1.04-1.08)
Increment: 1.5 /yglm3
HR (95% CI)
28 County, 3 year model
All 7 ecologic covariates: 0.977 (0.932-
1.025)
July 2009
E-653
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Krewski et al. (2009,
191193)
Period of Study: 1979-2000
Location: 48 contiguous states US
Outcome: Death from cardiopulmonary
disease
Study Design: cohort
Covariates: demographic, socioeconomic
and ecologic characteristics
Statistical Analysis: Cox proportional-
hazards model
Statistical Package: NR
Age Groups: Adults of at least 30 years
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: NR
Mean Unit:
1979-1983: 21.20//gfm3
1999-2000: 14.02 //g/m3
Range (Min, Max):
1979-1983: 10.77-30.01
1999-2000: 5.80-22.20
Copollutant: SO42, SO2, PMib, TSP, O3,
no2,co
Increment: 10//gfm3
Hazard Ratio (95% CI)
MSA&DIFF
Increment Change: 1.078 (1.077-1.182)
Change 5-15 //g/m3: 1.208 (1.132-1.290)
Change 10-20 //g/m3: 1.127 (1.081-
1.174)
HR (95% CI)
Los Angeles
Parsimonious ecologic covariates: 1.086
(0.939-1.285)
HR (95% CI)
15 year time window
Group A: 1.00 (0.90-1.11)
Group B: 1.05 (1.03-1.07)
HR (95% CI)
Third follow-up, 7 Ecologic Variables
1979-1983: 1.094 (1.070-1.118)
1999-2000: 1.138 (1.106-1.172)
HR (95% CI)
Nationwide analysis, 1999-2000
Standard Cox: 1.09 (1.06-1.12)
Random Effects Cox: 1.13 (1.10-1.16)
Increment: 1.5 /yglm3
HR (95% CI)
28 County, 3 year model
All 7 ecologic covariates: 0.940 (0.875-
1.011)
July 2009
E-654
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Krewski et al. (2009,
191193)
Period of Study: 1979-2000
Location: 48 contiguous states US
Outcome: Death from ischemic heart
disease
Study Design: cohort
Covariates: demographic, socioeconomic
and ecologic characteristics
Statistical Analysis: Cox proportional-
hazards model
Statistical Package: NR
Age Groups: Adults of at least 30 years
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: NR
Mean Unit:
1979-1983: 21.20//gfm3
1999-2000: 14.02 //g/m3
Range (Min, Max):
1979-1983: 10.77-30.01
1999-2000: 5.80-22.20
Copollutant: SO42, SO2, PMib, TSP, O3,
no2,co
Increment: 10//gfm3
Hazard Ratio (95% CI)
MSA&DIFF
Increment Change: 1.196 (1.177-1.407)
Change 5-15 //g/m3: 1.484 (1.311-1.680)
Change 10-20//gfm3: 1.283 (1.186-
1.387)
HR (95% CI)
Los Angeles
Parsimonious ecologic covariates: 1.263
(10.22-1.563)
HR (95% CI)
Third follow-up, 7 Ecologic Variables
1979-1983: 1.184 (1.146-1.222)
1999-2000: 1.242 (1.191-1.295)
HR (95% CI)
Nationwide analysis, 1999-2000
Standard Cox: 1.15 (1.11-1.20)
Random Effects Cox: 1.24 (1.19-1.29)
Increment: 1.5 /yglm3
HR (95% CI)
28 County, 3 year model
All 7 ecologic covariates: 1.072 (0.980-
1.172)
July 2009
E-655
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Krewski et al. (2009,
191193)
Period of Study: 1979-2000
Location: 48 contiguous states US
Outcome: Death from lung cancer
Study Design: cohort
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: NR
Covariates: demographic, socioeconomic Mean Unit:
and ecologic characteristics
Statistical Analysis: Cox proportional-
hazards model
1979-1983: 21.20//gfmJ
1999-2000: 14.02 //g/m3
Range (Min, Max):
Statistical Package: NR
Age Groups: Adults of at least 30 years 1979-1983: 10.77-30.01
1999-2000: 5.80-22.20
Copollutant: SO42, SO2, PMib, TSP, O3,
no2,co
Increment: 10//g/m3
Hazard Ratio (95% CI)
MSA&DIFF
Increment Change: 1.142 (1.057-1.234)
Change 5-15 //gfm3: 1.236 (1.114-1.372)
Change 10-20//gfm3: 1.143 (1.071-
1.221)
HR (95% CI)
Los Angeles
Parsimonious ecologic covariates: 1.311
(0.897-1.915)
HR (95% CI)
15 year time window
Group A: 1.08 (0.87-1.35)
Group B: 1.07 (1.02-1.13)
HR (95% CI)
Third follow-up, 7 Ecologic Variables
1979-1983: 1.092 (1.033-1.154)
1999-2000: 1.138 (1.057-1.225)
HR (95% CI)
Nationwide analysis, 1999-2000
Standard Cox: 1.11 (1.04-1.18)
Random Effects Cox: 1.14 (1.06-1.23)
Increment: 1.5 //g|m3
HR (95% CI)
28 County, 3 year model
All 7 ecologic covariates: 0.985 (0.832-
1.166)
Reference: Krewski et al. (2009,
Outcome: Death from diabetes
Pollutant: PM2.6
Increment: 1.5 //g/m3
191193)
Study Design: cohort
Averaging Time: NR
HR (95% CI)
Period of Study: 1979-2000
Covariates: demographic, socioeconomic
Mean Unit:
28 County, 3 year model
Location: 48 contiguous states US
and ecologic characteristics
1979-1983: 21.20//g/m3
All 7 ecologic covariates: 1.083 (0.723-
Statistical Analysis: Cox proportional-
1999-2000: 14.02 //g/m3
1.621)
hazards model
Statistical Package: NR
Range (Min, Max):
Age Groups: Adults of at least 30 years
1979-1983: 10.77-30.01
1999-2000: 5.80-22.20
Copollutant: SO42', SO2, PMib, TSP, O3,
N02.C0
July 2009
E-656
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Krewski et al. (2009,
Outcome: Death from endocrine disease
Pollutant: PM2.B
Increment: 1.5 //g/m3
191193)
Study Design: cohort
Averaging Time: NR
HR (95% CI)
Period of Study: 1979-2000
Covariates: demographic, socioeconomic
Mean Unit:
28 County, 3 year model
Location: 48 contiguous states US
and ecologic characteristics
1979-1983: 21.20//g/m3
All 7 ecologic covariates: 1.143 (0.835-
Statistical Analysis: Cox proportional-
1999-2000: 14.02 //g/m3
1.564)
hazards model
Statistical Package: NR
Range (Min, Max):
Age Groups: Adults of at least 30 years
1979-1983: 10.77-30.01
1999-2000: 5.80-22.20
Copollutant: SO42, SO2, PMib, TSP, O3,
N02,C0
Reference: Krewski et al. (2009,
Outcome: Death from digestive cancer
Pollutant: PM2.B
Increment: 10 //g/m3
191193)
Study Design: cohort
Averaging Time: NR
HR (95% CI)
Period of Study: 1979-2000
Covariates: demographic, socioeconomic
Mean Unit:
Los Angeles
Location: 48 contiguous states US
and ecologic characteristics
1979-1983: 21.20//g/m3
Parsimonious ecologic covariates: 1.199
Statistical Analysis: Cox proportional-
1999-2000: 14.02 //g/m3
(0.817-1.758)
hazards model
Statistical Package: NR
Range (Min, Max):
Age Groups: Adults of at least 30 years
1979-1983: 10.77-30.01
1999-2000: 5.80-22.20
Copollutant: SO42', SO2, PMib, TSP, O3,
N02.C0
Reference: Krewski et al. (2009,
Outcome: Death cancers other than lung
Pollutant: PM2.B
Increment: 10 //g/m3
191193)
and digestive
Averaging Time: NR
HR (95% CI)
Period of Study: 1979-2000
Study Design: cohort
Mean Unit:
Los Angeles
Location: 48 contiguous states US
Covariates: demographic, socioeconomic
and ecologic characteristics
1979-1983: 21.20//g/m3
Parsimonious ecologic covariates: 1.012
(0.788-1.299)
Statistical Analysis: Cox proportional-
1999-2000: 14.02 //g/m3
hazards model
Range (Min, Max):
Statistical Package: NR
1979-1983: 10.77-30.01
Age Groups: Adults of at least 30 years
1999-2000: 5.80-22.20
Copollutant: SO42', SO2, PMib, TSP, O3,
N02,C0
Reference: Krewski et al. (2009,
Outcome: Deaths from causes other than
Pollutant: PM2.B
Increment: 10 //g/m3
191193)
CPD, IHD and lung cancer
Averaging Time: NR
Hazard Ratio (95% CI)
Period of Study: 1979-2000
Study Design: cohort
Mean Unit:
MSA&DIFF
Location: 48 contiguous states US
Covariates: demographic, socioeconomic
and ecologic characteristics
1979-1983: 21.20//g/m3
Increment Change: 1.010 (0.968-1.055)
Statistical Analysis: Cox proportional-
1999-2000: 14.02//g/m3
Change 5-15//g/m3: 1.026 (0.970-1.085)
hazards model
Range (Min, Max):
Change 10-20//g/m3: 1.016 (0.981 -
Statistical Package: NR
1979-1983: 10.77-30.01
1.053)
Age Groups: Adults of at least 30 years
1999-2000: 5.80-22.20
HR (95% CI)
Copollutant: SO42', SO2, PMib, TSP, O3,
Third follow-up, 7 Ecologic Variables
N02,C0
1979-1983: 0.983 (0.960-1.007)
1999-2000: 0.953 (0.923-0.984)
July 2009
E-657
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: McDonnell et al. (2000,
Outcome: Mortality
Pollutant: PM2.6
Increment: IQR
010319)
Study Design: Cohort (AHSMOG airport
Averaging Time: monthly averages
All Cause: 1.22 (0.95-1.58)
Period of Study: 1973-1977
cohort)
Mean (SD): 31.9 (10.7)
Resp: 1.64 (0.93-2.90)
Location: California
Statistical Analyses: Cox regression
models
IQR: 24.3
Lung Cancer: 2.23 (0.56-8.94)
Age Groups: Males, 27 yrs +
Copollutants (correlation): O3: 0.68
SO2: 0.18
NO2: -0.08;
S(k 0.33
Reference: Miller et al. (2007, 090130)
Outcome: CVD Mortality
Pollutant: PM2.6
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Period of Study: 1994-1998
Study Design: Prospective Cohort (WHI)
Averaging Time: annual avg (2000)
CVD Death: 1.76(1.25, 2.47)
Location: 36 US Metropolitan Areas
Statistical Analyses: Cox proportional
Mean (SD): 13.4
CHD Death: 2.21 (1.17,4.16)
hazards regression
IQR: 11.6,18.3
CV Death: 1.83(1.11,3.00)
Age Groups: postmenopausal women
Range: 3.4, 28.3
ages 50-79
July 2009
E-658
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Naess et al. (2007, 090736) Outcome: Mortality: Non-accidental
(< 800)
Period of Study: 1992-1998
Location: Oslo, Norway
Lung cancer (162)
C0PD (490-496)
Cardiovascular (390-459)
Study Design: Prospective Cohort
Statistical Analyses: Cox proportional
hazards regression model
Age Groups: 51-70, 71-90
Pollutant: PM2.B
Averaging Time: 4 year avg
Mean (SD): PMz.b: 15
Range (Min, Max): PM2 e: (7, 22)
Copollutant (correlation): NO2:
r - 0.95
Relative Risk (CI min, CI max)
RR for deaths from all causes
Men (ages 51-70) PM2.6 exposure
(in/yg/m3)
6.56-11.45: 1.00
11.46-14.25:0.96 (0.89,1.04)
14.26-18.43:1.12(1.03,1.22)
18.44-22.34:1.48 (1.36,1.60)
Men (ages 71-90) PM2.6 exposure
(in/yg/m3)
6.56-11.45: 1.00
11.46-14.25:0.99 (0.93,1.06)
14.26-18.43:1.10(1.03,1.17)
18.44-22.34:1.19(1.12,1.27)
Women (ages 51-70) PM2.6 exposure
(in/yg/m3)
6.56-11.45: 1.00
11.46-14.25:0.96 (0.87,1.07)
14.26-18.43:1.08 (0.98,1.20)
18.44-22.34:1.44(1.30,1.59)
Women (ages 71-90) PM2.6 exposure
(in/yg/m3)
6.56-11.45: 1.00
11.46-14.25:1.03 (0.97,1.09)
14.26-18.43:1.07 (1.01,1.12)
18.44-22.34:1.11 (1.05,1.16)
Increment: 10/yg/m3
RR for death from CVD and lung cancer
Men (ages 51-70)
CVD-PM2.6:1.11 (1.06,1.16)
C0PD- PM2.6: 1.32 (1.17,1.49)
Lung Cancer- PM2.6: 1.07 (0.98,1.17)
Women (ages 51-70)
CVD: PMib: 1.16 (1.09,1.24)
C0PD: PM2 b: 1.18 (1.03,1.34)
Lung Cancer: PM2.6: 1.23 (1.10,1.37)
Men (ages 71-90)
CVD: PM2.B: 1.06 (1.03,1.09)
C0PD: PM10: 1.13 (1.04,1.24)
PMib: 1.14(1.04,1.24)
Lung Cancer: PM2.6: 1.08 (0.98,1.19)
Women (ages 71-90)
CVD: PM2.B: 1.02 (1.00,1.05)
C0PD: PM2.6: 1.09 (1.00,1.18)
Lung Cancer: PM2.B: 1.16 (1.03,1.31)
Reference: Naess et al. (2007, 090736) Outcome: Mortality: Lung cancer (162) Pollutant: PM2 e
Period of Study: 1992-1998 C0PD (490-496) Averaging Time: (Month-year) avg
Relative Risk (CI min, CI max)
RR on All-cause mortality of PM2.5 in
July 2009
E-659
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Location: Oslo, Norway
Cardiovascular (390-459)
Psychiatric causes (290, 292-302, 304,
306-319)
Stomach cancer (151)
Violence (800-999)
Study Design: Multilevel cohort
Statistical Analyses: WinBUGS
Age Groups: 50-74
Range Mean (SD): 14.2 (3.6)
IQ Range (1st, 4th): (6.6, 22.3)
Copollutant (correlation): PMio:
r - 0.951
NO?: r - 0.87
Men Age 50-74
Primary Education: PM2.6: 1.06 (1.00,
1.11)
Individual: 1.34 (1.24,1.43)
Neighborhood: 1.22 (1.16,1.28)
Manual Class: PM2 B: 1.06 (1.01,1.12)
Individual: 1.28(1.20,1.37)
Neighborhood: 1.20(1.14,1.26)
Income below median: PM2.6: 1.05 (1.00,
1.12)
Individual: 1.44(1.35,1.53)
Neighborhood: 1.16 (1.11,1.21)
Not owner occupied: PM2.6: 1.06(1.00,
1.13)
Individual: 1.24 (1.12,1.36)
Neighborhood: 1.11 (1.05,1.17)
Lives in flat dwelling: PM2.6: 1.04 (0.98,
1.11)
Individual: 1.19(1.09,1.31)
Neighborhood: 1.10(1.04,1.17)
More than one person per room in
dwelling: PMib: 1.10 (1.02,1.18)
Individual: 1.05(0.98,1.13)
Neighborhood: 1.01 (0.96,1.05)
RR on All-cause mortality of PM2.5 in
Women Age 50-74
Primary Education Only: PM2.6: 1.05
(1.00,1.11)
Individual: 1.32(1.23,1.42)
Neighborhood: 1.18(1.12,1.24)
Manual Class: PM2 B: 1.07 (1.01,1.13)
Individual: 1.27 (1.18,1.36)
Neighborhood: 1.18(1.12,1.24)
Income below median: PM2.6: 1.05 (1.01,
1.10)
Individual: 1.52(1.41,1.63)
Neighborhood: 1.13 (1.09,1.18)
Not owner occupied: PM2.6: 1.07 (1.01,
1.14)
Individual: 1.24 (1.12,1.38)
Neighborhood: 1.08 (1.02,1.14)
Lives in a flat dwelling: PM2.6: 1.05 (0.99,
1.11)
Individual: 1.21 (1.09,1.34)
Neighborhood: 1.09 (1.02,1.15)
More than one person per room in
dwelling: PM2.1,: 1.11 (1.04,1.19)
Individual: 1.07 (0.99,1.14)
Neighborhood: 1.01 (0.96,1.05)
JlRJoMnter2uartNeJncreaseJMnjn__
July 2009
E-660
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI) ~
PM2.5 for different causes of death
CVD: Age and sex adjusted: 1.11 (1.07,
1.15)
Primary education only: M1 + Individual:
1.07 (1.04,1.11)
M1 +Neighborhood: 1.03 (1.00,1.07)
Manual Class: M1 + Individual: 1.08
(1.04,1.11)
M1 +Neighborhood: 1.06 (1.02,1.10)
Income below Median: M1 + Individual:
1.07 (1.03,1.11)
M1 +Neighborhood: 1.02 (0.98,1.05)
Not owner occupied: M1 + Individual:
1.05(1.01,1.09)
M1 +Neighborhood: 1.03 (0.99,1.07):
Living in a Flat dwelling
M1 +Individual: 1.04 (1.00,1.08)
M1 +Neighborhood: 1.01 (0.97,1.05)
Crowded household: M1 + Individual:
1.10(1.05,1.14)
MUNeighborhood: 1.10 (1.06,1.15)
Pulmonary Cancer: Age and sex adjusted:
1.12(1.05,1.19)
Primary education only: M1 + Individual:
1.09(1.01,1.17)
MUNeighborhood: 1.05 (0.98,1.13)
Manual Class: M1 + Individual: 1.09
(1.01,1.17)
MUNeighborhood: 1.10 (1.06,1.13)
Income below Median: M1 + Individual:
1.09(1.01,1.17)
M1 +Neighborhood: 1.02 (0.95,1.10)
Not owner occupied: M1 + Individual:
1.07 (1.00,1.15)
M1 +Neighborhood: 1.04 (0.97,1.12)
Living in a Flat dwelling: M1 + Individual:
1.03(0.96,1.11)
M1 +Neighborhood: 1.00 (0.92,1.08)
Crowded household: M1 + Individual:
1.10(1.03,1.14)
MUNeighborhood: 1.11 (1.04,1.20)
C0PD: Age and sex adjusted: 1.17 (1.09,
1.25)
Primary education only: M1 + Individual:
1.13(1.05,1.22)
M1 +Neighborhood: 1.09 (1.01,1.19)
Manual Class: M1 + Individual: 1.14
(1.05,1.23)
MUNeighborhood: 1.12 (1.04,1.22)
Income below Median: M1 + Individual:
1.13(1.04,1.22)
M1 +Neighborhood: 1.06 (0.97,1.15)
July 2009
E-661
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
1.10(1.02,1.19)
M1 + Neighborhood: 1.07 (0.99,1.16)
Living in a Flat dwelling: M1 + Individual:
1.08(1.00,1.18)
M1 + Neighborhood: 1.03 (0.95,1.13)
Crowded household: M1 + Individual:
1.16(1.07,1.26)
MUNeighborhood: 1.16 (1.07,1.26)
Estimates for psychiatric diseases,
genetic cancer and violent death
Reference: Nerriere et al. (2005,
088630)
Period of Study: Grenoble (2001)
Paris (2002)
Rouen (2002-2003)
Strasbourg (2003)
Location: Four French Cities- Grenoble,
Rouen, Paris, and Strasbourg
Outcome: Mortality: Lung Cancer (162)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: GIS
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 48-h avg
Mean Range:
Age Groups: 30-71 year old nonsmoking 17 to 49//gfm3
adults
Increment: 10 //g/m3
% Increase (Lower CI, Upper CI)
% increase in lung cancer deaths
attributable to PM2.6 exposure
France: 8 (1,16)
Grenoble: 10 (3,19)
Rouen: 10 (2,19)
Strasbourg: 24 (4, 40)
Reference: Ozkaynak and Thurston
(1987,072960)
Period of Study: 1980
Location: U.S.
Outcome: Total Mortality
Study Design: Cross-sectional
Statistical Analyses: Multiple
regression analysis
Pollutant: Sulfate
Averaging Time: Annual avg
Mean Range: Sulfate: 11.1 (3.5)
Range of estimated total mortality
effects of air pollutions: Sulfate: 4-9%
"Sulfate concentration was consistently
found to be a significant predictor of
mortality in the models considered. Fine
particle mass coefficients were also often
found to be statistically significant in the
mortality regressions."
July 2009
E-662
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Pope et al. (2004, 055880)
Period of Study: 1982-2000
Location: Metropolitan areas in all 50
states in the US
Outcome: Mortality: Cardiovascular
Diseases (390-459)
Diabetes (250)
Respiratory Disease (460-519)
Study Design: Prospective Cohort
Statistical Analyses: Cox proportional
hazards regression
Age Groups: >30
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: Annual avg
Mean (SD): 17.1 (3.7)
Range (Min, Max): NR
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Relative Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
All cardiovascular disease plus diabetes:
PMz.b: 1.12 (1.08,1.15)
Former Smoker: 1.26 (1.23,1.28)
Current Smoker: 1.94 (1.90,1.99)
Ischemic Heart Disease: PM2.6: 1.18
(1.14,1.23)
Former Smoker: 1.33 (1.29,1.37)
Current Smoker: 2.03 (1.96, 2.10)
Diabetes: PM2.6: 0.99 (0.86,1.14)
Former Smoker: 1.05 (0.94,1.16)
Current Smoker: 1.35 (1.20,1.53)
All other Cardiovascular Diseases: PM2.6:
0.84 (0.71,0.99)
Former Smoker: 1.22 (1.09,1.38)
Current Smoker: 1.78 (1.56, 2.04)
Diseases of the respiratory system:
PM2.6: 0.92 (0.86, 0.98)
Former Smoker: 2.16 (2.04, 2.28)
Current Smoker: 3.88 (3.66, 4.11)
C0PD: PM2.6: 0.84 (0.77, 0.93)
Former Smoker: 4.93 (4.48, 5.42)
Current Smoker: 9.85 (8.95,10.84)
All other respiratory diseases: PM2.6:
0.86(0.73,1.02)
Former Smoker: 1.54 (1.36,1.74)
Current Smoker: 1.83 (1.57, 2.12)
Reference: Pope et al. (2007, 091256)
Period of Study: 1960-1975
Location: New Mexico, Arizona, Utah,
and Nevada
Outcome (ICD7&8):
Mortality: Cardiovascular (ICD 7: 400-
468, 331, 332 ICD 8: 390-458)
Respiratory (ICD 7: 470-527 ICD 8: 460-
519)
Influenza/ pneumonia (ICD 7: 480-483,
490-493, ICD 8: 470-474, 480-486)
Study Design: Retrospective Cohort
Statistical Analyses: Poisson regression
model
GAM
SAS
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
The study does not present quantitative
results
results are presented in figures. The
References found that the strike-related
estimated percent decrease in mortality
was 2.5% (1.1-4.0),
: Groups: All smelter workers > 18
July 2009
E-663
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Pope et al. (2009,190107)
Period of Study: 1978-1982,1997-
2001
Location: 211 US counties and 51
metropolitan areas
Outcome: Increased life expectancy
Study Design: Cross-sectional
Statistical Analysis: Cross-sectional
regression
Age Groups: Adults £45 years
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: daily, quarterly and
annual
Mean (SD) Unit:
1979-1983: 20.61 ± 4.36//gfm3
1999-2000: 14.10 ± 2.86//gfm3
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Regression Coefficient ± SD
211 County Units
Intercept: 1.75 ± 0.27
Reduction in PM2.6: 0.61 ± 0.20
Change in Income: 0.13 ± 0.01
Change in Population: 0.06 ± 0.02
Change in Black Population: -2.70 ± 0.64
Change in Lung Cancer Mortality Rate: -
0.06 ± 0.02
Change in C0PD Mortality Rate: -0.08 ±
0.02
R: 0.53
51 Metropolitan Areas
Intercept: 2.09 ± 0.36
Reduction in PM2.6: 0.95 ± 0.23
Change in Income: 0.11 ± 0.02
Change in Population: 0.05 ± 0.02
Change in Black Population: -5.98 ± 1.99
Change in Lung Cancer Mortality Rate:
0.02 ± 0.03
Change in C0PD Mortality Rate: -0.19 ±
0.05
R: 0.74
Reference: Rainham et al. (2005,
088676)
Period of Study: 1981-1999
Location: Toronto, Canada
Outcome: Total deaths (ICD9 < 800),
cardiorespiratory (390-459), non-
cardiorespiratory (ICD9-NR)
Study Design: Time-series
Statistical Analyses: Generalized linear
models were used
Season: Winter (December-February)
Summer (June-August)
Statistical Package: S-Plus 6.1
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: NR
Mean (SD): All years: 17.0 (8.7)//g|m3
Winters: 17.2 (6.8)
Summers: 18.8 (10.2)
Avg Winter values: Dry Moderate: 17.0
(1.0)
Dry Polar: 17.5(0.5)
Dry Tropical: No Comparison
Moist Moderate: 17.1 (0.8)
Moist Polar: 17.5 (0.6)
Moist Tropical: 16.5 (3.6)
Transition: 16.7 (1.0)
Avg summer values: Dry Moderate: 18.4
(0.9)
Dry Polar: 19.0(1.2)
Dry Tropical: 18.5 (2.4)
Moist Moderate: 19.2 (1.2)
Moist Polar: 17.5 (2.0)
Moist Tropical: 19.8 (1.1)
Transition: 17.6 (1.5)
Mortality risk for winter season and
within winter synoptic weather
categories
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Winter: Total: 0.998(0.997,1.000]
Cardioresp: 0.998(0.996,1.000]
Other: 0.998 [0.996,1.000]
Dry Moderate: Total: 1.001(0.996,
1.007]
Cardioresp: 1.005(0.998,1.011]
Other: 1.002 [0.998,1.005]
Dry Polar: Total: 0.998(0.995,1.001]
Cardioresp: 0.995(0.991, 0.999]
Other: 1.002 (0.998,1.005]
Dry Tropical: NA
Moist Moderate: Total: 0.998(0.993,
1.002]
Cardioresp: 1.003(0.995,1.010]
Other: 0.997 [0.991,1.004]
Moist Polar: Total: 1.001(0.998,1.005]
Cardioresp: 1.002(0.997,1.007]
Other: 1.003 (0.999,1.007]
Moist Tropical: Total: 1.007(0.965,
1.203]
Cardioresp: 1.123(1.031,1.224]
July 2009
E-664
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Other: 1.248 [1.123,1.387]
Transition Total: 1.003[0.996,1.009]
Cardioresp: 0.996(0.987,1.004]
Other: 0.997 [0.990,1.004]
Mortality risk for summer season and
within summer synoptic weather
categories
RR Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Summer: Total: 1.000(1.000,1.001]
Cardioresp: 1.001(1.000,1.002]
Other: 1.001(1.000,1.002]
Dry Moderate: Total: 1.001(0.999,
1.002]
Cardioresp: 1.002(0.999,1.004]
Other: 0.999(0.997,1.002]
Dry Polar: Total: 1.002(0.999,1.005]
Cardioresp: 0.996(0.991,1.000]
Other: 1.003[ 0.999,1.007]
Dry Tropical: Total: 1.016(1.006,1.027]
Cardioresp: 1.017(1.005,1.030]
Other: 1.017 (1.003,1.031]
Moist Moderate: Total: 1.002(1.000,
1.004]
Cardioresp: 1.003(0.999,1.006]
Other: 1.004(1.001,1.006]
Moist Polar: Total: 1.005(0.998,1.011]
Cardioresp: 1.008(0.997,1.018]
Other: 1.003 (0.995,1.011]
Moist Tropical: Total: 0.999(0.997,
1.001]
Cardioresp: 0.996(0.993,1.000]
Other: 0.998 (0.995,1.001]
Transition: Total: 1.005(0.996,1.014]
Cardioresp: 1.007(0.994,1.020]
Other: 1.002 (0.996,1.008]
Reference: Roman et al. (2008,156921) Outcome: Mortality
Period of Study: 2006 Study Design: Expert Judgment Study
Location: U.S.
Statistical Analyses: Standard best
practices for expert elicitation
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: annual average
Mean (SD): 4-30
Quantitative results are not presented in
the text, but can be found graphically in
Figure 3.
"Most of the experts' central estimates
fall at or above the 2002 ACS median
(0.6% per//g/m3) and below the original
Six Cities median (1.2% per/yg/m3)."
July 2009
E-665
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Schwartz, et al (2008,
156921)
Period of Study: 1979-1988
Location: Six U.S. metropolitan areas:
Boston, Massachusetts
Outcome: Mortality
Pollutant: PM2.6
PM Increment: 10//g/m3
Study Design: Poisson regression with
GAM
Statistical Analyses: Weighted linear
regression
Averaging Time: daily
Mean (SD): Boston-16.5
Knoxville-21.1
The difference between mean PM2.6
concentrations of 10 |Jg/m3 and 20
|jg/m3 is associated with about a 1.5%
increase in deaths.
Knoxville, Tennessee
Season: all
St. Louis-19.2
St. Louis, Missouri
Dose-response Investigated? No
Steubenville-30.5
Steubenville, Ohio
Statistical Package: S-plus
Madison-11.3
Madison, Wisconsin
T opeka-12.2
and Topeka, Kansas
SD not reported
Range (Min, Max): (0,35)
Monitoring Stations: 6
Reference: (Schwartz et al„ 2008,
156963)
Period of Study: 1979-1998
Location: Watertown, MA
Kingston and Harriman, TN
St Louis, MO
Steubenville, OH
Portage, Wyocena
Pardeeville Wl
Topeka, KS
Outcome: Mortality: Non-accidental
(< 800)
Study Design: Cross-sectional
Statistical Analyses: Cox proportional
hazards regression
penalized splines
Bayesian Model Averaging
Age Groups: >18
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: Annual avg
Mean (SD): 17.5 (6.8)
Range (Min, Max): (8, 40)
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Relative Risk (Lower CI, Upper CI)
Estimated from Figure 4: All Cause
Mortality ¦ Year before Death
0: 1.10(1.00,1.21)
1: 1.03(0.98,1.08)
2: 1.01 (1.00,1.02)
3: 1.00(0.99,1.01)
4: 1.00(0.99,1.01)
5: 1.00
Lung Cancer Mortality ¦ Year Before
Death
Estimated from Figure 5
0: 1.18(1.00,1.48)
1: 1.12(0.98,1.33)
2: 1.08(0.92,1.22)
3: 1.02(1.01,1.03)
4: 1.01 (1.00,1.02)
5: 1.01
RR per 10 //g/m3 increase of PM2.6
exposure
Level Of Increase
Estimated from Figure 3
10 //g/m3: 1.15
20 //g/m3: 1.29
30//g/m3: 1.46
40 //g/m3: 1.64
July 2009
E-666
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Reference: Tainio et al. (2005, 087444) Outcome (ICD10): Mortality:
Cardiopulmonary (111-170 and J15-J47)
Period of Study: 1997-Present
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Lung Cancer (C34)
Other causes
Study Design: Time-series simulation
Statistical Analyses: Monte Carlo
Simulation
Age Groups: All ages
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): 10.7
Range (Min, Max): NR
Estimated Deaths Per Year (Min CI,
Max CI) Associated with Primary
PM2.5 Emissions from buses in
Helsinki in 2020 for different bus
strategies
Cardiopulmonary Mortality
Current Fleet: 15.9 (0, 46.6)
Modern Diesel: 7.9 (0, 23.0)
Diesel with particle trap: 3.9 (0,12)
Natural gas bus: 2.3 (0, 6.8)
Lung Cancer Mortality
Current Fleet: 2.2 (0, 6.1)
Modern Diesel: 1.1 (0, 3.0)
Diesel with particle trap: 0.6 (0,1.6)
Natural gas bus: 0.3 (0, 0.9)
Total Mortality
Current Fleet: 18.1 (0, 55.0)
Modern Diesel: 9.0 (0, 27.0)
Diesel with particle trap: 4.4 (0,14.1)
Natural Gas Bus: 2.6 (0, 8.0)
Reference: Villeneuve et al. (2002,
042576)
Period of Study: 1974-1991
Location: Six US Cities: Steubenville,
OH, St. Louis, M0, Portage, Wl, Topeka,
KS, Watertown, MA, Kingston/ Harriman,
TN
Outcome (ICD 10): Mortality: Non-
accidental (< 800)
Study Design: Prospective Cohort
Statistical Analyses: Poisson, EPICURE
Age Groups: All ages
<60
>60
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 24-h avg
Mean (SD): Portage: 10.9 (7.2)
Topeka: 12.1 (7.1)
Harriman: 20.7 (9.4)
Watertown: 14.9 (8.4)
St. Louis: 18.7 (10.6)
Steubenville: 28.6 (21.0)
Overall: 18.6
Range (Min, Max): NR
Increment: 18.6/yg/m3
Relative Risk (Min CI, Max CI)
RR of all cause mortality for exposure of
PM2.E by age group
Exposure to PM2.6 remained fixed over
entire study period
<60:1.89 (1.32, 2.69)
>60:1.21 (1.02,1.43)
Total: 1.31 (1.12,1.52)
Exposure to PM2.6 was defined according
to 13 calendar periods* (no smoothing)
<60:1.52 (1.15, 2.00)
>60:1.11 (0.95,1.29)
Total: 1.19(1.04,1.36)
Exposure to PM2.6 was defined according
to 13 calendar periods* (smoothed)
<60:1.43 (1.10,1.85)
>60:1.09 (0.93,1.26)
Total: 1.16(1.02,1.32)
Time dependent estimate of PM2.6
received during the previous two years
<60:1.42 (1.09,1.82)
>60:1.08 (0.94,1.25)
Total: 1.16(1.02,1.31)
Time dependent estimate of PM2.6
received 3-5 years before current year
<60:1.35 (1.08,1.67)
>60:1.08 (0.95,1.22)
Total: 1.14(1.02,1.27)
July 2009
E-667
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Time dependent estimate of PM2.6
received >5 years before current year
<60:1.34 (1.11,1.59)
>60:1.09 (0.99,1.20)
Total: 1.14(1.05,1.23)
* The calendar periods used were: 1970-
1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983,
1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989,
and 1990+.
RR of all cause mortality and PM2.6
exposure by city
Portage: 1.16 (0.96,1.39)
Topeka: 1.06 (0.89,1.27)
Harriman
Men: 1.04 (0.79,1.36)
Women: 0.96 (0.69,1.31)
All: 1.13 (0.95,1.35)
Watertown
Men: 1.20(0.95,1.51)
Women: 1.06 (0.78,1.43)
All: 1.32 (1.11,1.51)
St. Louis
Men: 0.97(0.76,1.24)
Women: 1.13 (0.86,1.49)
Steubenville
Men: 1.39(1.11,1.74)
Women: 1.22 (0.93,1.61)
Reference: Willis et al. (2003, 089922)
Outcome: Mortality: All causes
Pollutant: Sulfates
All Cause, Metropolitan Scale: 1.25
(1.13,1.37)
Period of Study: 1982-1989
Lung Cancer (162)
Averaging Time: Annual avg
All Cause, County Scale: 1.50 (1.30,
Location: US Metropolitan areas in all 50
Cardiopulmonary (401-440,460-519)
Mean (SD): 10.6/yg/m3
1.73)
states
Study Design: Prospective Cohort
Range (Min, Max): 3.6, 23.5
CPD, Metropolitan Scale: 1.29 (1.15,
Statistical Analyses: Cox proportional
Copollutant: CO, I\I02,03,S02
1.46)
hazards model
CPD, County Scale: 1.75 (1.48, 2.08)
Age Groups: All ages
Reference: Zanobetti and Schwartz
Outcome: Mortality, all causes, excluding
Pollutant: PM2.6
Increment: 10//gfm3
(2009,188462)
ICD codes S00-U99
Averaging Time: 24h
Percent Increase (95% CI) in mortality
Period of Study: 1999-2005
Study Design: Time-series
Mean (SD) Unit://g/m3
by increment of PM2.5, combined by
season
Location: 112 US Cities
Covariates: Region, season
Birmingham AL ¦ 16.5
All Cause Mortality
Statistical Analysis: Poisson regression
Phoenix AZ - 11.4
Overall: 0.98 (0.75-1.22)
Age Groups: All
LittleRock AR ¦ 14.3
Winter: 0.56(0.17-0.94)
Fresno CA ¦ 19.4
Spring: 2.57 (1.96-3.19)
Bakersfield CA ¦ 21.7
Summer: 0.25 (-0.13-0.63)
Los Angeles CA ¦ 19.9
Autumn: 0.95 (0.56-1.34)
Anaheim CA ¦ 16.3
CVD
Rubidoux CA ¦ 24.9
Overall: 0.85 (0.46-1.24)
Sacramento CA ¦ 13.0
Winter: 0.70(0.04-1.36)
El Cajon CA ¦ 13.5
Spring: 2.18 (1.22-3.15)
July 2009
E-668
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Denver CO ¦ 10.3
Hartford CT ¦ 11.6
New Haven CT ¦ 13.7
Wilmington DE ¦ 15.1
Davie FL ¦ 8.4
Miami FL ¦ 9.4
Jacksonville FL ¦ 10.6
Pensacola FL ¦ 12.4
Tampa FL- 11.9
Orlando FL -10.3
Palm beach FL ¦ 7.9
Pinellas FL ¦ 10.4
Atlanta GA ¦ 17.6
Chicago IL ¦ 15.9
Gary IN - 15.3
Indianapolis IN -16.3
Cedar Rapids IA - 11.0
Des Moines IA - 10.5
Davenport IA ¦ 12.3
Louisville KY ¦ 15.9
Baton Rouge LA ¦ 13.4
Avondale LA ¦ 12.3
New Orleans LA ¦ 12.6
Baltimore MD ¦ 15.6
Springfield MA ¦ 12.3
Boston MA ¦ 12.4
Worcester MA ¦ 11.3
Holland Ml - 12.1
Grand Rapids Ml -13.6
Detroit Ml ¦ 16.2
Minneapolis MN - 11.1
Kansas MO ¦ 12.0
St Louis MO ¦ 14.5
Omaha NE ¦ 10.4
Elizabeth NJ -14.7
Albuquerque NM - 6.7
New York NY - 14.8
Bath NY - 9.6
Durham NC ¦ 14.3
Winston NC -14.7
Greensborough NC ¦ 14.2
Charlotte NC ¦ 15.3
Raleigh NC - 14.3
Middletown OH ¦ 16.4
Youngstown OH ¦ 15.6
Summer: -0.03 (-0.75-0.69)
Autumn: 0.92 (0.17-1.68)
Ml
Overall: 1.18 (0.48-1.89)
Winter: 1.29 (-0.14-2.75)
Spring: 2.12 (0.53-3.74)
Summer: -0.03 (-1.46-1.42)
Autumn: 1.24 (0.12-2.36)
Stroke
Overall: 1.78 (0.96-2.62)
Winter: 1.93(0.34-3.54)
Spring: 2.04 (-0.02-4.13)
Summer: 1.64 (0.05-3.26)
Autumn: 1.69 (0.06-3.35)
Respiratory
Overall: 1.68 (1.04-2.33)
Winter: 0.86 (-0.16-1.88)
Spring: 4.62 (3.08-6.18)
Summer: 0.78 (-0.49-2.06)
Autumn: 1.45 (0.19-2.72)
Percent Increase (95% CI) in mortality
by increment in PM2.5 combined by
region
All Cause Mortality
Humid Subtropical and Maritime: 1.02
(0.65-1.38)
Warm Summer Continental: 1.19 (0.73-
1.64)
Hot Summer Continental: 1.14 (0.55-
1.73)
Dry: 1.18 (-0.70-3.10)
Dry, Continental: 1.26 (-0.21-2.76)
Mediterranean: 0.50 (0.00-1.01)
CVD
Humid Subtropical and Maritime: 0.78
(0.05-1.51)
Warm Summer Continental: 1.43 (0.67-
2.19)
Hot Summer Continental: 0.43 (-0.53-
1.40)
Dry: 3.11 (-0.02-6.33)
Dry, Continental: 1.67 (-0.75-4.16)
Mediterranean: 0.16 (-0.46-0.79)
Ml
Humid Subtropical and Maritime: 0.97 (¦
0.29-2.26)
Warm Summer Continental: 1.50 (0.05-
2.97)
Hot Summer Continental: 0.64 (-0.96-
2.28)
July 2009
E-669
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Cleveland OH - 16.4
Columbus OH ¦ 16.2
Cincinnati OH ¦ 17.1
Steubenville OH ¦ 17.0
Toledo OH - 14.9
Dayton OH ¦ 16.2
Akron OH - 16.0
Warren OH - 15.3
Oklahoma OK ¦ 9.9
Tulsa OK - 11.1
Bend OR ¦ 7.8
Medford OR ¦ 9.9
Klamath OR - 10.6
Eugene OR ¦ 8.0
Portland OR ¦ 8.8
Gettysburg PA ¦ 13.4
Pittsburgh PA ¦ 15.7
State College PA ¦ 13.2
Carlisle PA - 15.1
Harrisburg PA ¦ 15.5
Erie PA - 13.1
Scranton PA - 11.8
Allentown PA ¦ 14.2
Wilkes Barre PA - 12.8
Mercer PA ¦ 14.1
Easton PA ¦ 14.0
Philadelphia PA ¦ 14.5
Washington PA ¦ 14.7
Providence Rl - 11.5
Charleston SC ¦ 12.1
Taylors SC ¦ 15.3
Columbia SC ¦ 14.0
Spartanburg SC ¦ 14.2
Nashville TIM - 14.0
Knoxville TIM - 16.0
Memphis TN ¦ 13.5
San Antonio TX ¦ 9.4
Dallas TX - 12.9
El Paso TX ¦ 9.2
Houston TX ¦ 12.9
Port Arthur TX-11.5
Ft Worth TX - 12.2
Austin TX -10.4
Salt Lake UT ¦ 11.5
Provo UT ¦ 9.5
Dry: 4.25 (-2.38-11.33)
Dry, Continental: 0.60 (-7.42-9.32)
Mediterranean: 1.85 (-0.66-4.41)
Stroke
Humid Subtropical and Maritime: 2.94
(1.59-4.32)
Warm Summer Continental: 1.85 (0.04-
3.69)
Hot Summer Continental: 0.77 (-1.77-
3.38)
Dry: 1.82 (-6.98-11.45)
Dry, Continental: 2.49 (-2.32-7.53)
Mediterranean: 0.95 (-0.66-2.59)
Respiratory
Humid Subtropical and Maritime: 0.91 (¦
0.25-2.08)
Warm Summer Continental: 2.12 (0.89-
3.36)
Hot Summer Continental: 3.36 (1.95-
4.79)
Dry: 5.81 (-0.04-12.00)
Dry, Continental: -0.31 (-5.89-5.61)
Mediterranean: 1.06 (-0.36-2.50)
July 2009
E-670
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
WDCVA- 15.2
Annandale VA ¦ 14.0
Dumbarton VA ¦ 13.6
Chesapeake VA ¦ 12.7
Norfolk VA-12.7
Richmond VA ¦ 14.3
Seattle WA -10.1
Tacoma WA ¦ 11.2
Spokane WA ¦ 9.1
Dodge Wl- 11.1
Milwaukee Wl -13.2
Waukesha Wl - 13.2
Range (Min, Max): NR
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Reference: Zeger et al. (2007,157176) Outcome: Mortality
Period of Study: 2000-2002
Location: 250 largest US counties
Study Design: Retrospective Cohort
(MCAPS)
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: 3 year avg
Statistical Analyses: log-linear
regression models (GAM)
Covariates: age, gender, race, county-
level SES, education and C0PD SMR
Age Groups: 65 +
65-74,75-84,85 +
Increment: 10 //g/m3
65+: 1.076(1.044,1.108)
Eastern US: 1.125 (1.091,1.159)
Central US: 1.196 (1.115,1.277)
Western US: 1.029 (0.994,1.064)
65-74: 1.156(1.117,1.196)
75-84: 1.081 (1.042,1.121)
85+: 0.995 (0.956,1.035)
Reference: Zeger et al. (2008,191951) Outcome: Mortality
Period of Study: 2000-2005
Study Design: Retrospective Cohort
Location: 4568 zip codes in urban areas Statistical Analysis: Log-linear
regression model
Age Groups: £65
Pollutant: PM2.6
Averaging Time: Annual
Median (SD) Unit:
Eastern: 14.0 //g|m3
Central: 10.7 //g|m3
Western: 13.1 //g|m3
All: 13.2/yg|m3
Range (IQR):
Eastern: 12.3-15.3
Central: 9.8-12.2
Western: 10.4-18.5
All: 11.1-14.9
Copollutant (correlation): NR
Increment: 10 //g/m3
Relative Risk (Min CI, Max CI)
Lag
Risk estimate for increase in mortality per
increase in PM2.6, all ages
Eastern Region
Age: 1.155 (1.130-1.180)
Age + SES: 1.105 (1.084-1.125)
Age + SES + C0PD: 1.068 (1.049-
1.087)
Central Region
Age: 1.178 (1.133-1.222)
Age + SES: 1.089 (1.052-1.125)
Age + SES + C0PD: 1.132 (1.095-
1.169)
Western Region
Age: 1.003 (0.981-1.025)
Age + SES: 0.997 (0.978-1.016)
Age + SES + C0PD: 0.989 (0.970-
1.008)
Risk estimate for increase in mortality per
increase in PM2.6, ages 65-74
Eastern Region
Age: 31.1 (26.8-35.5)
Age + SES: 17.3(14.6-20.0)
July 2009
E-671
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Age + SES + COPD: 11.4(8.8-14.1)
Central Region
Age: 39.0 (29.7-48.2)
Age + SES: 16.5(10.9-22.1)
Age + SES + COPD: 20.4(15.0-25.8)
Western Region
Age: 6.0 (2.3-9.6)
Age + SES: -2.1 (-5.0-0.8)
Age + SES + COPD:-1.5 (-4.2-1.1)
Risk estimate for increase in mortality per
increase in PM2.6, ages 75-84
Eastern Region
Age: 17.6(14.9-20.4)
Age + SES: 12.4 (10.1-14.6)
Age + SES + COPD: 8.9 (6.8-11.0)
Central Region
Age: 17.5 (12.7-22.2)
Age + SES: 8.8(4.6-13.0)
Age + SES + COPD: 12.0(7.6-16.4)
Western Region
Age: 0.4 (-2.0-2.7)
Age + SES: 0.3 (-1.8-2.5)
Age + SES + COPD:-0.2 (-2.2-1.9)
Risk estimate for increase in mortality per
increase in PM2.6, aged £85
Eastern Region
Age:-1.4 (-3.5-0.8)
Age + SES: 1.4 (-0.7-3.5)
Age + SES + COPD: 1.7 (-0.3-3.7)
Central Region
Age:-2.1 (-5.9-1.6)
Age + SES: -0.7 (-4.2-2.8)
Age + SES + COPD: -0.3 (-4.0-3.3)
Western Region
Age: -5.2 (-7.2-3.2)
Age + SES: 0.9 (-0.8-2.7)
Age + SES + COPD:-0.5 (-2.5-1.5)
'All units expressed in //gfm3 unless otherwise specified.
Table E-34. Long-term exposure - central nervous system outcomes - PM.
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Author: Calderon-Garciduenas et al.
(2008,192369)
Period of Study: NR
Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10):
PM Size: No measure of PM
hippocampus, substantia nigrae,
Location: Mexico City (polluted city) and periaqueductal gray and vagus nerves
C0X2 (cyclooxygenase), IL-1 (3, CD14 in used Mexico City as the "polluted city"
lungs, OB (olfactory bulb), frontal cortex, and Tlaxcala and Veracruz as the "control
cities"
PM Increment: NA
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
RT-PCR sample results from Control and
Mexico City (MC) lung, CNS, PNS
July 2009
E-672
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
T'axcala and Veracruz (control cities), fl G Analyzed:
Mexico a M '
Subjects 2-45 yrs of age
mean-25.1 ± 1.5 yrs
Study Design:
Cross-sectional
N: 47 deceased subjects with complete
autopsies and neuropathological
examinations (each subject had to be
considered clinically healthy and
cognitively and neurologically intact prior
to death) (primarily cause of death:
accidents resulting in immediate death)
Statistical Analyses: NR
likely used T-tests
in addition, stated using "parametric
procedure that considers the differences
among variances of the variables of
interest"
Covariates: Age, gender, place of birth,
place of residency, occupation, smoking
habits, clinical histories, cause of death,
and time between death and autopsy
Season: NR
Dose-response Investigated? (Yes/No):
No
Statistical package: Stata
Averaging Time: NA
Mean (SD): NA
Percentiles: NA
Range (Min, Max): NA
Unit (i.e. /yg/m3): NA
Number of Monitoring Stations: NA
Co-pollutant (correlation):
NA
(peripheral nervous system) tissues and p-
value for the difference between the
means
concentrations are normalized to the
amount of GAPDH cDNA
C0X2 (cyclooxygenase-2) lung
Controls: 15.9±6.7 x 10e
MC residents: 42.3±7.4 x 10e
p-value: 0.015
IL-1 (3 lung
Controls: 3.08 ± 1.87 x 106
MC residents: 4.51 ±2.6 x 10e
p-value: 0.60
C0X2 0B (olfactory bulb)
Controls: 12.9±3.0 x 106
MC residents: 38.7±5.5x106
p-value: 0.0002
IL-1 (3 0B
Controls: 3.4±0.8 x 10"
MC residents: 7.7±1.0 x 10"
p-value: 0.003
CD140B
Controls: 0.01 ±0.001
MC residents: 0.04±0.01
p-value: 0.04
C0X2 frontal
Controls: 2.6±0.4 x 106
MC residents: 5.0 ± 0.7 x 106
p-value: 0.008
IL-1 p frontal
Controls: 0.6±0.2 x 10"
MC residents: 6.2 ± 1.3 x 10"
p-value: 0.0002
C0X2 hippocampus
Controls: 1.9±0.5 x 106
MC residents: 1.6 ± 8.7 x 106
p-value: 0.1
IL-1 (3 hippocampus
Controls: 1.8 ±0.2x10"
MC residents: 3.0 ± 0.5 x 10"
p-value: 0.06
C0X2 substantia nigrae
Controls: 0.16±0.06
MC residents: 0.97±0.2
p-value: 0.03
IL-1 (3 substanita nigrae
July 2009
E-673
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Controls: 0.01 ±0.005
MC residents: 0.09±0.03
pvalue: 0.06
CD14 substantia nigrae
Controls: 0.02±0.005
MC residents: 0.03±0.007
p value: 0.7
C0X2 periaqueductal gray
Controls: 0.10 ±0.03
MC residents: 0.45±0.12
p value: 0.12
IL-1 (3 periaqueductal gray
Controls: 0.009±0.003
MC residents: 0.07±0.02
p value: 0.09
C0X2 left vagus
Controls: 0.65±0.18
MC residents: 2.68±0.82
p value: 0.03
C0X2 right vagus
Controls: 0.43±0.09
MC residents: 3.68±0.8
p value: 0.0002
IL-1 (3 left vagus
Controls: 0.1 ±0.03
MC residents: 1.3±0.73
p value: 0.06
IL-1 fB right vagus
Controls: 0.15 ±0.09
MC residents: 0.87±0.53
p value: 0.66
CD14 left vagus
Controls: 0.07±0.01
MC residents: 0.79±0.41
p value: 0.01
CD14 right vagus
Controls: 0.05±0.01
MC residents: 0.31 ±0.1
p value: 0.02
Distribution of subjects with expression
of Af342 as a function of age and
residency
Groups: No (%) with Af342 expression
Controls < 25yr AP0E 3/3 (n — 6): 0 (0)
Controls > 25yr AP0E 3/3 (n — 3): 0 (0)
MC E2 or E3 < 25yr (n-17): 10 (58.82)
July 2009
E-674
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CI)
MC E2 or E3 >25yr (n-10): 8 (80)
MC E4 (n — 8): 8 (100)
Controls E4 (n — 3): 2 (66)
Distribution of subjects with expression
of ~ synuclein as a function of age and
residency
Groups: No (%) with synuclein
expression
Controls < 25yr APOE 3/3 (n — 6): 0 (0)
Controls >25yr APOE 3/3 (n — 3): 0 (0)
MC E2 or E3 < 25yr (n-17): 4 (23.5)
MC E2 or E3 >25yr (n-10): 3 (30)
MC E4 (n — 8): 2 (25)
Controls E4 (n — 3): 0 (0)
Increment: 10/yg/m3
Regression Coefficient p (95% CI)
Crude
SRTT: 2.14 (-0.084.36)
SDST: 0.08(0.04-0.13)
SDLT Trials: 0.22(0.13-0.31)
SDLT Total: 0.44 (0.23-0.65)
Model 1: adjusted for age, sex,
race/ethnicity
SRTT: 2.03 (-0.15-4.20)
SDST: 0.10(0.05-0.15)
SDLT Trials: 0.23(0.14-0.32)
SDLT Total: 0.48 (0.27-0.68)
Model 2: Model 1 + socioeconomic
factors
SRTT: -0.11 (-2.38-2.16)
SDST: 0.01 (-0.04-0.06)
SDLT Trials: 0.01 (-0.08-0.10)
SDLT Total:-0.07 (-0.27-0.13)
Model 3: Model 2 + lifestyle factors
SRTT:-0.36 (-2.58-1.85)
SDST: 0.00 (-0.04-0.05)
SDLT Trials: 0.09(0.00-0.17)
SDLT Total: 0.12 (-0.07-0.31)
Reference: Chen and Schwartz (2009,
179945)
Period of Study: 1989-1991
Location: US
Outcome: change in central nervous
system function
Study Design: Panel
Covariates: age, sex, race/ethnicity,
individual socioeconomic position,
lifestyle factors, household and
neighborhood characteristics,
conventional CVD risk factors
Statistical Analysis: Pearson Chi-
square tests and t-tests, as appropriate
Statistical Package: STATA
Age Groups: 20-59 years
Pollutant: PMio
Averaging Time: 1 year
Mean (SD) Unit: 37.2 ± 12.8/yg/m3
Copollutant: 0:i
July 2009
E-675
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Study
Design & Methods
Concentrations'
Effect Estimates (95% CI)
Author: Suglia et al. (2008,157027)
Period of Study: 1986-2001
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Outcome (ICD9 and ICD10):
Cognition:
Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, K BIT
(vocabulary and matrices subscales and
composite IQ score)
Wide Range Assessment of Memory and
Learning, WRAML (psychometric
instrument with subscales on verbal
memory, visual memory, learning, and
overall general index scale)
All cognition scores have a mean of 100
and SD-15.
Age Groups Analyzed: Cognitive tests
administered when children were 8-11
yrs of age
Study Design: Cross-sectional
N: 202 children
Statistical Analyses: Linear regression
Covariates: Child's age at cognitive
assessment, gender, primary language
spoken at home, and maternal education
(model 1
"demographic factors")
sensitivity analyses performed with
further adjustment for in-utero and
postnatal secondhand tobacco smoke
exposure (via questionnaire during follow-
ups and urinary cotinine levels) (model 2)
birth weight (model 3)
and blood lead level (model 4)
Season: Separate land-use regression
models were fit for the warm (May-Oct)
and cold (Nov-Apr) seasons
used average of two seasons as measure
of average lifetime BC exposure
Dose-response Investigated? (Yes/No):
No
Statistical package: SAS (v9.0)
PM Size: Black carbon (BC)
Averaging Time: Lifetime exposure
Estimated 24hr measures of traffic using
a spatiotemporal land-use regression
model using data from > 80 locations in
Greater Boston (6021 pollution
measurements from 2127 unique
exposure days)
Predictors in the land-use regression
analysis were the BC level at a central
station (to capture average
concentrations on that day),
meteorological conditions,
weekdayfweekend, and measure of
traffic activity (GIS-based measures of
cumulative traffic density within 100m,
population density, distance to nearest
major roadway, % urbanization)
Used the average of the cold and warm
seasons as the measure of average
lifetime BC exposure
Mean (SD): 0.56(0.13) (Jg/m3
Percentiles: NR
Range (Min, Max): NR
Unit (i.e. /yg/m3):
Number of Monitoring Stations: >80
locations
Co-pollutant (correlation): NA
July 2009
E-676
PM Increment: 0.4/yg/m3
Effect Estimate [Lower CI, Upper CI]:
Change in subscale score (95%CI) per IQR
(0.4 |jg/m3) increase in log BC level
KBIT
Vocabulary:
Adj for demographic factors: -2.0 (-5.3,
1.3)
Adj for above factors + secondhand
smoke: -2.0 (-5.3,1.4)
Adj for above factors + birth weight: -2.0
(-5.4,1.3)
Adj for above factors + blood lead level: -
2.2 (-5.5,1.1)
Matrices:
Adj for demographic factors: -4.2 (-7.7, ¦
0.7)
Adj for above factors + secondhand
smoke: -4.0 (-7.5, -0.4)
Adj for above factors + birth weight: -4.0
(-7.6, -0.5)
Adj for above factors + blood lead level: -
4.0 (-7.6,-0.5)
Composite:
Adj for demographic factors: -3.4 (-6.6, ¦
0.3)
Adj for above factors + secondhand
smoke: -3.3 (-6.4, -0.1)
Adj for above factors + birth weight: -3.3
(-6.5, -0.2)
Adj for above factors + blood lead level: -
3.4 (-6.6, -0.3)
WRAML
Verbal:
Adj for demographic factors: -1.1 (-4.6,
2.3)
Adj for above factors + secondhand
smoke: -1.2 (-4.7, 2.3)
Adj for above factors + birth weight: -1.3
(-4.7, 2.2)
Adj for above factors + blood lead level: -
1.3(-4.8, 2.2)
Visual:
Adj for demographic factors: -5.2 (-8.6, ¦
1.7)
Adj for above factors + secondhand
smoke: -5.3 (-8.8, -1.8)
Adj for above factors + birth weight: -5.3
(-8.8,-1.8)
Adj for above factors + blood lead level: -
5.4 (-8.9,-1.9)
Learning:
Adj for demographic factors: -2.7 (-6.5,
1.1)
Adj for above factors + secondhand
smoke: -2.6 (-6.5,1.2)
Adj for above factors + birth weight: -2.6
' 6DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
Adj for above factors + blood lead level: -
2.8(-6.6,1.1)
General:
-------
Study Design & Methods Concentrations' Effect Estimates (95% CTT
'All units expressed in //gfm3 unless otherwise specified.
July 2009
E-677
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Annex E References
Abbey DE; Nishino N; McDonnell WF; Burchette RJ; Knutsen SF; Beeson WL; Yang JX. (1999). Long-term
inhalable particles and other air pollutants related to mortality in nonsmokers. Am J Respir Crit Care
Med, 159: 373-382. 047559
Abrahamowicz Mi Schopflocher Ti Leffondre Ki Du Berger Ri Krewski D. (2003). Flexible modeling of exposure-
response relationship between long-term average levels of particulate air pollution and mortality in the
American Cancer Society study. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 66: 1625-1654. 086292
Ackermann-Liebrich Ui Leuenberger Pi Schwartz J; Schindler Ci Monn Ci Bolognini Bi Bongard JPi Brandli Oi
Domenighetti Gi Elsasser Si Grize Li Karrer Wi Keller Ri Keller-Wossidlo Hi Kunzli Ni Martin BWi
Medici TCi Pliger Bi Wuthrich Bi Zellweger JPi Zemp E. (1997). Lung function and long term exposure to
air pollutants in Switzerland. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 155: 122-129. 077537
Adamkiewicz Gi Ebelt Si Syring Mi Slater Ji Speizer FEi Schwartz Ji Suh Hi Gold DR. (2004). Association
between air pollution exposure and exhaled nitric oxide in an elderly population. Thorax, 59: 204-209.
087925
Adar SDi Adamkiewicz Gi Gold DRi Schwartz Ji Coull BAi Suh H. (2007). Ambient and microenvironmental
particles and exhaled nitric oxide before and after a group bus trip. Environ Health Perspect, 115: 507"
12. 098635
Adar SDi Gold DRi Coull BAi Schwartz Ji Stone PHi Suh H. (2007). Focused exposures to airborne traffic
particles and heart rate variability in the elderly. Epidemiology, 18: 95-103. 001458
Aekplakorn Wi Loomis Di Vichit-Vadakan Ni Shy Ci Plungchuchon S. (2003). Acute effects of S02 and particles
from a power plant on respiratory symptoms of children, Thailand. , 34: 906-914. 089908
Aga Ei Samoli Ei Touloumi Gi Anderson HRi Cadum Ei Forsberg Bi Goodman Pi Goren Ai Kotesovec Fi Kriz Bi
Macarol-Hiti Mi Medina Si Paldy Ai Schindler Ci Sunyer Ji Tittanen Pi Wojtyniak Bi Zmirou Di Schwartz
Ji Katsouyanni K. (2003). Short-term effects of ambient particles on mortality in the elderly: results from
28 cities in the APHEA2 project. , 40: 28s-33s. 187122
Agarwal Ri Jayaraman Gi Anand Si Marimuthu P. (2006). Assessing respiratory morbidity through pollution
status and meteorological conditions for Delhi. Environ Monit Assess, 114: 489-504. 099086
Allen RWi Criqui MHi Diez Roux AVi Allison Mi Shea Si Detrano Ri Sheppard Li Wong Ni Hinckley Stukovsky
Ki Kaufman JD. (2009). Fine particulate air pollution, proximity to traffic, and aortic atherosclerosis:
The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Epidemiology, 20: 254-264. 189644
Allen RWi Mar Ti Koenig Ji Liu LJi Gould Ti Simpson Ci Larson T. (2008). Changes in lung function and airway
inflammation among asthmatic children residing in a woodsmoke-impacted urban area. Inhal Toxicol,
20: 423-433. 156208
Analitis Ai Katsouyanni Ki Dimakopoulou Ki Samoli Ei Nikoloulopoulos AKi Petasakis Yi Touloumi Gi
Schwartz Ji Anderson HRi Cambra Ki Forastiere Fi Zmirou Di Vonk JMi Clancy Li Kriz Bi Bobvos Ji
Pekkanen J. (2006). Short-term effects of ambient particles on cardiovascular and respiratory mortality. ,
17: 230-233. 088177
Andersen ZJi Wahlin Pi Raaschou-Nielsen Oi Ketzel Mi Scheike Ti Loft S. (2008). Size distribution and total
number concentration of ultrafine and accumulation mode particles and hospital admissions in children
and the elderly in Copenhagen, Denmark. , 65: 458-66. 189651
Andersen ZJi Wahlin Pi Raaschou-Nielsen Oi Scheike Ti Loft S. (2007). Ambient particle source apportionment
and daily hospital admissions among children and elderly in Copenhagen. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol,
17: 625-636. 093201
Anderson HRi Atkinson RWi Bremner SAi Marston L. (2003). Particulate air pollution and hospital admissions
for cardiorespiratory diseases: are the elderly at greater risk?. Eur Respir J, 40: 39s-46s. 054820
Anderson MEi Bogdan GM. (2007). Environments, indoor air quality, and children. Pediatr Clin North Am, 54:
295-307, viii. 156214
Annesi-Maesano, I.i Forastiere, F.i Kunzli, N.i Brunekref, B.i Environment and Health Committee of the
European Respiratory Society. (2007). Particulate matter, science and EU policy. Eur Respir J, 29: 428"
431. 091348
Note: Hyperlinks to the reference citations throughout this document will take you to the NCEA HERO database (Health
and Environmental Research Online) at http: //epa.gov/hero. HERO is a database of scientific literature used by U.S. EPA in
the process of developing science assessments such as the Integrated Science Assessments (ISA) and the Integrated Risk
Information System (IRIS).
July 2009
E-678
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Arbex MA; Martins LC; De Oliveira RC; Pereira LA; Arbex FF; Cancado JE; Saldiva PH; Braga AL. (2007). Air
pollution from biomass burning and asthma hospital admissions in a sugar cane plantation area in
Brazil. J Epidemiol Community Health, 61- 395-400. 091637
Auchincloss AH; Roux AV; Dvonch JT; Brown PL; Barr RG; Daviglus ML; Goff DC; Kaufman JD; O'Neill MS.
(2008). Associations between Recent Exposure to Ambient Fine Particulate Matter and Blood Pressure in
the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Environ Health Perspect, 116- 486-491. 156234
Avol EL; Gauderman WJ; Tan SM; London SJ; Peters JM. (2001). Respiratory effects of relocating to areas of
differing air pollution levels. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 164: 2067-2072. 020552
Babin SM; Burkom HS; Holtry RS; Tabernero NR; Stokes LD; Davies-Cole JO; DeHaan K; Lee DH. (2007).
Pediatric patient asthma-related emergency department visits and admissions in Washington, DC, from
2001-2004, and associations with air quality, socio-economic status and age group. , 6: 9. 188476
Baccarelli A; Martinelli I; Pegoraro V; Melly S; Grillo P; Zanobetti A; Hou L; Bertazzi PA; Mannucci PM;
Schwartz J. (2009). Living near Major Traffic Roads and Risk of Deep Vein Thrombosis. , x: x. 188183
Baccarelli A; Martinelli I; Zanobetti A; Grillo P; Hou LF; Bertazzi PA; Mannucci PM; Schwartz J. (2008).
Exposure to Particulate Air Pollution and Risk of Deep Vein Thrombosis. Arch Intern Med, 168: 920-927.
157984
Baccarelli A; Zanobetti A; Martinelli I; Grillo P; Hou L; Giacomini S; Bonzini M; Lanzani G; Mannucci PM;
Bertazzi PA; Schwartz J. (2007). Effects of exposure to air pollution on blood coagulation. J Thromb
Haemost, 5: 252-260. 090733
Baccarelli A; Zanobetti A; Martinelli I; Grillo P; Hou L; Lanzani G; Mannucci PM; Bertazzi PA; Schwartz J.
(2007). Air pollution, smoking, and plasma homocysteine. Environ Health Perspect, 115: 176-181. 091310
Bakke B; Ulvestad B; Stewart P; Eduard W. (2004). Cumulative exposure to dust and gases as determinants of
lung function decline in tunnel construction workers. Occup Environ Med, 61: 262-269. 156246
Ballester F; Medina S; Boldo E; Goodman P; Neuberger M; Iniguez C; Kunzli N. (2008). Reducing ambient levels
of fine particulates could substantially improve health: a mortality impact assessment for 26 European
cities. J Epidemiol Community Health, 62: 98-105. 189977
Ballester F; Rodriguez P; Iniguez C; Saez M; Daponte A; Galan I; Taracido M; Arribas F; Bellido J; Cirarda FB;
Canada A; Guillen JJ; Guillen-Grima F; Lopez E; Perez-Hoyos S; Lertxundi A; Toro S. (2006). Air
pollution and cardiovascular admisisons association in Spain: results within the EMECAS project. J
Epidemiol Community Health, 60: 328-336. 088746
Ballester F; Saez M; Perez-Hoyos S; Iniguez C; Gandarillas A; Tobias A; Bellido J; Taracido M; Arribas F;
Daponte A; Alonso E; Canada A; Guillen-Grima F; Cirera L; Perez-Boillos MJ; Saurina C; Gomez F;
Tenias JM. (2002). The EMECAM project: a multicentre study on air pollution and mortality in Spain:
combined results for particulates and for sulfur dioxide. Occup Environ Med, 59: 300-308. 030371
Barclay JL; Egred M; Kruszewski K; Nandakumar R; Norton MY; Stirrat C; Redpath TW; Walton S; Hillis GS.
(2007). The relationship between transmural extent of infarction on contrast enhanced magnetic
resonance imaging and recovery of contractile function in patients with first myocardial infarction
treated with thrombolysis. Cardiology, 108: 217-22. 192229
Barclay JL; Miller BG; Dick S; Dennekamp M; Ford I; Hillis GS; Ayres JG; Seaton A. (2009). A panel study of
air pollution in subjects with heart failure: negative results in treated patients. Occup Environ Med, 66:
325-334. 179935
Barnett AG; Williams GM; Schwartz J; Neller AH; Best TL; Petroeschevsky AL; Simpson RW. (2005). Air
pollution and child respiratory health: a case-crossover study in Australia and New Zealand. Am J Respir
Crit Care Med, 171: 1272-1278. 087394
Barraza-Villarreal A; Sunyer J; Hernandez-Cadena L; Escamilla-Nunez MC; Sienra-Monge JJ; Ramirez"Aguilar
M; Cortez-Lugo M; Holguin F; Diaz-Sanchez D; Olin AC; Romieu I. (2008). Air pollution, airway
inflammation, and lung function in a cohort study of Mexico City schoolchildren. Environ Health
Perspect, 116: 832-838. 156254
Bartzokas A; Kassomenos P; Petrakis M; Celessides C. (2004). The effect of meteorological and pollution
parameters on the frequency of hospital admissions for cardiovascular and respiratory problems in
Athens. Indoor Built Environ, 13: 271-275. 093252
Basu R; Feng WY; Ostro BD. (2008). Characterizing temperature and mortality in nine California counties. , 19:
138-45. 098716
Bateson TF; Schwartz J. (2004). Who is sensitive to the effects of particulate air pollution on mortality? A case-
crossover analysis of effect modifiers. Epidemiology, 15: 143-149. 086244
Bayer-Oglesby L; Grize L; Gassner M; Takken-Sahli K; Sennhauser FH; Neu U; Schindler C; Braun-Fahrlander
C. (2005). Decline of ambient air pollution levels and improved respiratory health in Swiss children.
Environ Health Perspect, 113: 1632-1637. 086245
July 2009
E-679
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Beelen R; Hoek Gi van den Brandt PA; Goldbohm RA; Fischer P; Schouten LJ; Jerrett Mi Hughes Ei Armstrong
Bi Brunekreef B. (2008). Long-term effects of traffic-related air pollution on mortality in a Dutch cohort
(NLCS-AIR study). Environ Health Perspect, 116- 196-202. 156263
Beeson WLi Abbey DE; Knutsen SF. (1998). Long-term concentrations of ambient air pollutants and incident
lung cancer in California adults' results from the AHSMOG study. Environ Health Perspect, 106- 813-
823.048890
Bell Mi Ebisu K> Peng R; Samet J; Dominici F. (2009). Hospital Admissions and Chemical Composition of Fine
Particle Air Pollution. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 179- 1115-1120. 191997
Bell ML; Ebisu K; Belanger K. (2007). Ambient air pollution and low birth weight in Connecticut and
Massachusetts. Environ Health Perspect, 115: 1118-24. 091059
Bell ML; Ebisu K; Peng RD; Dominici F. (2009). Adverse health effects of particulate air pollution: modification
by air conditioning. Epidemiology, in press: in press. 191007
Bell ML; Kim JY; Dominici F. (2007). Potential confounding of particulate matter on the short-term association
between ozone and mortality in multisite time-series studies. Environ Health Perspect, 115: 1591-1595.
093256
Bell ML; Levy JK; Lin Z. (2008). The effect of sandstorms and air pollution on cause-specific hospital admissions
in Taipei, Taiwan. Occup Environ Med, 65: 104-111. 091268
Bellini P; Baccini M; Biggeri A; Terracini B. (2007). The meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term
effects of air pollution (MISA): old and new issues on the interpretation of the statistical evidences.
Environmetrics, 18: 219-229. 097787
Bennett CM; Simpson P; Raven J; Skoric B; Powell J; Wolfe R; Walters EH; Abramson MJ. (2007). Associations
between ambient PM2.5 concentrations and respiratory symptoms in Melbourne, 1998-2005. J Toxicol
Environ Health A, 70: 1613-1618. 156268
Binkova B; Chvatalova I; Lnenickova Z; Milcova A; Tulupova E; Farmer PB; Sram RJ. (2007). PAH-DNA
adducts in environmentally exposed population in relation to metabolic and DNA repair gene
polymorphisms. , 620: 49-61. 156273
Boezen HM! Van Der Zee SC; Postma DS; Vonk JM; Gerritsen J; Hoek G; Brunekreef B; Rijcken B; Schouten
JP. (1999). Effects of ambient air pollution on upper and lower respiratory symptoms and peak
expiratory flow in children. Lancet, 353: 874-878. 040410
Boezen HM; Vonk JM; Van Der Zee SC; Gerritsen J; Hoek G; Brunekreef B; Schouten JP; Postma DS. (2005).
Susceptibility to air pollution in elderly males and females. Eur Respir J, 25: 1018-1024. 087396
Bourotte C', Curi-Amarante A"P; Forti M"C; APereira LA; Braga AL; Lotufo PA. (2007). Association between
ionic composition of fine and coarse aerosol soluble fraction and peak expiratory flow of asthmatic
patients in Sao Paulo city (Brazil). Atmos Environ, 41: 2036-2048. 150040
Brauer M; Gehring U; Brunekreef B; De Jongste J; Gerritsen J; Rovers M; Wichmann H"E; Wijga A; Heinrich J.
(2006). Traffic-related air pollution and otitis media. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 1414-1418. 090757
Brauer M; Hoek G; Smit HA; De Jongste JC; Gerritsen J; Postma DS; Kerkhof M; Brunekreef B. (2007). Air
pollution and development of asthma, allergy and infections in a birth cohort. Eur Respir J, 29: 879-888.
090691
Brauer M; Hoek G; Van Vliet P; Meliefste K; Fischer PH; Wijga A; Koopman LP; Neijens HJ; Gerritsen J;
Kerkhof M; Heinrich J; Bellander T; Brunekreef B. (2002). Air pollution from traffic and the development
of respiratory infections and asthmatic and allergic symptoms in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med,
166: 1092-1098. 035192
Brauer M; Lencar C; Tamburic L; Koehoorn M; Demers P; Karr C. (2008). A cohort study of traffic-related air
pollution impacts on birth outcomes. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 680-686. 156292
Breitner S; Stolzel M; Cyrys J; Pitz M; Wolke G; Kreyling W', Kiichenhoff H; Heinrich J; Wichmann H; Peters A.
(2009). Short-Term Mortality Rates during a Decade of Improved Air Quality in Erfurt, Germany.
Environ Health Perspect, 117: 448. 188439
Briet M; Collin C; Laurent S; Tan A; Azizi M; Agharazii M; Jeunemaitre X; Alhenc-Gelas F; Boutouyrie P.
(2007). Endothelial function and chronic exposure to air pollution in normal male subjects.
Hypertension970"976. 093049
Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett
M; van den Brandt P. (2009). Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory
and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: The NLCS-AIR Study. Health Effects Institute. Boston,
MA. 139. 191947
Burnett RT; Stieb D; Brook JR; Cakmak S; Dales R; Raizenne M; Vincent R; Dann T. (2004). Associations
between short-term changes in nitrogen dioxide and mortality in Canadian cities. Arch Environ Occup
Health, 59: 228-236. 086247
July 2009
E-680
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Burr ML; Karani G> Davies B; Holmes BA; Williams KL. (2004). Effects on respiratory health of a reduction in
air pollution from vehicle exhaust emissions. , 61- 212. 189788
Burr ML; Karani GJ Davies B; Holmes BA; Williams KL. (2004). Effects on respiratory health of a reduction in
air pollution from vehicle exhaust emissions. Occup Environ Med, 61- 212-218. 087809
Cakmak S; Dales RE; Vidal CB. (2007). Air pollution and mortality in Chile- susceptibility among the elderly.
Environ Health Perspect, 115: 524"7. 091170
Calderon-Garciduenas L; Maronpot RR; Torres-Jardon R; Henriquez-Roldan C; Schoonhoven R; Acuna-Ayala H;
Villarreal-Calderon A; Nakamura J; Fernando R; Reed W; Azzarelli B; Swenberg JA. (2003). DNA
damage in nasal and brain tissues of canines exposed to air pollutants is associated with evidence of
chronic brain inflammation and neurodegeneration. Toxicol Pathol, 31: 524-538. 156316
Calderon-Garciduenas L; Mora-Tiscareno A; Fordham LA; Chung CJ; Valencia-Salazar G; Flores-Gomez S; Solt
AC; Gomez-del Campo A; Jardon-Torres R; Henriquez-Roldan C; Hazucha MJ; Reed W. (2006). Lung
radiology and pulmonary function of children chronically exposed to air pollution. Environ Health
Perspect, 114: 1432-1437. 091253
Calderon-Garciduenas L; Macias-Parra M; Hoffmann HJ; Valencia-Salazar G; Henriquez-Roldan C; Osnaya N,
Monte OC; Barragan-Mejia G; Villarreal-Calderon R; Romero L; Granada-Macias M; Torres-Jardon R;
Medina-Cortina H; Maronpot RR. (2009). Immunotoxicity and environment: immunodysregulation and
systemic inflammation in children. Toxicol Pathol, 37: 161-169. 192107
Calderon-Garciduenas L; Mora-Tiscareno A; Ontiveros E; Gomez-Garza G; Barragan-Mejia G; Broadway J;
Chapman S; Valencia-Salazar G; Jewells V; Maronpot RR; Henriquez-Roldan C; Perez-Guille B; Torres-
Jardon R; Herrit L; Brooks D; Osnaya-Brizuela N; Monroy M. (2008). Air pollution, cognitive deficits and
brain abnormalities: A pilot study with children and dogs. Brain Cognit, 68: 117-127. 156317
Calderon-Garciduenas L; Solt A; Henriquez-Roldan C; Torres-Jardon R; Nuse B; Herritt L; Stone I. (2008).
Long-term air pollution exposure is associated with neuroinflammation , an altered innate immune
response, disruption of the blood-brain-barrier, ultrafine particle deposition, and accumulation of amyloid
642 and a synuclein in children and young adults. Toxicol Pathol, 36: 289-310. 192369
Cavallari JM; Eisen EA; Chen JC; Fang SC; Dobson CB; Schwartz J; Christiani DC. (2007). Night Heart Rate
Variability and Particulate Exposures among Boilermaker Construction Workers. Environ Health
Perspect, 115: 1046-1051. 157425
Cavanagh JA; Brown L; Trought K; Kingham S; Epton MJ. (2007). Elevated concentrations of 1 "hydroxypyrene
in schoolchildren during winter in Christchurch, New Zealand. Sci Total Environ, 374: 51"9. 098618
Cesaroni G; Badaloni C; Porta D; Forastiere F; Perucci CA. (2008). Comparison between several indices of
exposure to traffic-related air pollution and their respiratory health impact in adults. Occup Environ
Med, 65: 683-690. 156326
Chahine T; Baccarelli A; Litonjua A; Wright RO; Suh H; Gold DR; Sparrow D; Vokonas P; Schwartz J. (2007).
Particulate air pollution, oxidative stress genes, and heart rate variability in an elderly cohort. Environ
Health Perspect, 115: 1617-1622. 156327
Chan CC; Chuang KJ; Chen WJ; Chang WT; Lee CT; Peng CM. (2008). Increasing cardiopulmonary emergency
visits by long-range transported Asian dust storms in Taiwan. Environ Res, 106: 393-400. 093297
Chan MN; Chan CK. (2007). Mass transfer effects on the hygroscopic growth of ammonium sulfate particles
with a water-insoluble coating. Atmos Environ, 41: 4423-4433. 147787
Chang SY; Fang GC. (2007). Springtime soluble particles in a suburban area of Taichung in central Taiwan. ,
86: 30-41. 147621
Chardon B; Lefranc A; Granados D; Gremy I. (2007). Air pollution and doctors' house calls for respiratory
diseases in the greater Paris area (2000-3). Occup Environ Med, 64: 320-4. 091308
Chattopadhyay BP; Mukherjee A; Mukherjee K; Roychowdhury A. (2007). Exposure to vehicular pollution and
assessment of respiratory function in urban inhabitants. Lung, 185: 263-70. 147471
Chen J; Schwartz J. (2009). Neurobehavioral effects of ambient air pollution on cognitive performance in US
adults. Neurotoxicology, 30: 231-239. 179945
Chen JC; Schwartz J. (2008). Metabolic syndrome and inflammatory responses to long-term particulate air
pollutants. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 612-617. 190106
Chen L; Yang W', Jennison BL; Goodrich A; Omaye ST. (2002). Air pollution and birth weight in northern
Nevada, 1991-1999. Inhal Toxicol, 14: 141-157. 024945
Chen LH; Knutsen SF; Shavlik D; Beeson WL; Petersen F; Ghamsary M; Abbey D. (2005). The association
between fatal coronary heart disease and ambient particulate air pollution: Are females at greater risk?.
Environ Health Perspect, 113: 1723-1729. 087942
Chen Y; Yang Q; Krewski D; Burnett RT; Shi Y; McGrail KM. (2005). The effect of coarse ambient particulate
matter on first, second, and overall hospital admissions for respiratory disease among the elderly. Inhal
Toxicol, 17: 649-655. 087555
July 2009
E-681
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Cheng M-F; Tsai S"S; Wu T"N; Chen P-S; Yang C-Y. (2007). Air pollution and hospital admissions for
pneumonia in a tropical city- Kaohsiung, Taiwan. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 70- 2021-6. 093034
Chimonas MA; Gessner BD. (2007). Airborne particulate matter from primarily geologic, non-industrial sources
at levels below National Ambient Air Quality Standards is associated with outpatient visits for asthma
and quick-relief medication prescriptions among children less than 20 years old enrolled in Medicaid in
Anchorage, Alaska. Environ Res, 103- 397-404. 093261
Chiu H; Tiao Mi Ho S> Kuo Hi Wu Ti Yang C. (2008). Effects of Asian Dust Storm events on hospital admissions
for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Taipei, Taiwan. Inhal Toxicol, 20- 777-781. 191989
Chiu HFi Cheng MHi Yang CY. (2009). Air pollution and hospital admissions for pneumonia in a subtropical
city: Taipei, Taiwan. , 21: 32-7. 190249
Choi J-H Xu Q-S; Park S-Y> Kim J-H; Hwang S-S> Lee K-H> Lee H-J; Hong Y-C. (2007). Seasonal variation of
effect of air pollution on blood pressure. J Epidemiol Community Health314"318. 093196
Chuang K-Ji Chan C"Ci Su T"C> Lee C-Ti Tang C-S. (2007). The effect of urban air pollution on inflammation,
oxidative stress, coagulation, and autonomic dysfunction in young adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med,
176: 370-6. 091063
Chuang KJ; Chan CC; Su TC; Lin LY; Lee CT. (2007). Associations between particulate sulfate and organic
carbon exposures and heart rate variability in patients with or at risk for cardiovascular diseases. J
Occup Environ Med, 49: 610-7. 098629
Cardenas Mi Vallejo Mi Romano-Riquer Pi Ruiz-Velasco Si Ferreira-Vidal ADi Hermosillo AG. (2008). Personal
exposure to PM2.5 air pollution and heart rate variability in subjects with positive or negative head-up
tilt test. Environ Res, 108: 1-6. 191900
D'Ippoliti Di Forastiere Fi Ancona Ci Agabiti Ni Fusco Di Michelozzi Pi Perucci CA. (2003). Air pollution and
myocardial infarction in Rome: a case-crossover analysis. Epidemiology, 14: 528-535. 074311
Dales Ri Burnett RTi Smith-Doiron Mi Stieb DM; Brook JR. (2004). Air pollution and sudden infant death
syndrome. Pediatrics, 113: 628-631. 087342
Dales R; Liu L; Szyszkowicz M; Dalipaj M; Willey J; Kulka R; Ruddy TD. (2007). Particulate air pollution and
vascular reactivity: the bus stop study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 81: 159-164. 155743
Dales R; Wheeler A; Mahmud M; Frescura AM; Smith-Doiron M; Nethery E; Liu L. (2008). The Influence of
Living Near Roadways on Spirometry and Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Elementary Schoolchildren. Environ
Health Perspect, 116: 1423. 156378
Dales RE; Cakmak S; Doiron MS. (2006). Gaseous air pollutants and hospitalization for respiratory disease in
the neonatal period. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 1751-1754. 090744
Daniels MJ; Dominici F; Zeger SL; Samet JM. (2004). The national morbidity, mortality, and air pollution study
Part IIP PM10 concentration-response curves and thresholds for the 20 largest US cities. 087343
De Hartog JJ; Hoek G; Peters A; Timonen KL; Ibald-Mulli A; Brunekreef B; Heinrich J; Tiittanen P; Van
Wijnen JH; Kreyling W; Kulmala M; Pekkanen J. (2003). Effects of fine and ultrafine particles on
cardiorespiratory symptoms in elderly subjects with coronary heart disease: the ULTRA study. Am J
Epidemiol, 157: 613-623. 001061
De Leon SF; Thurston GD; Ito K. (2003). Contribution of respiratory disease to nonrespiratory mortality
associations with air pollution. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 167: 1117-1123. 055688
Delfino R; Brummel S; Wu J; Stern H; Ostro B; Lipsett M; Winer A; Street D; Zhang L; Tjoa T. (2009). The
relationship of respiratory and cardiovascular hospital admissions to the southern California wildfires of
2003. Occup Environ Med, 66: 189. 191994
Delfino RJ; Gong H; Linn WS; Hu Y; Pellizzari ED. (2003). Respiratory symptoms and peak expiratory flow in
children with asthma in relation to volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath and ambient air. J
Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 13: 348-363. 090941
Delfino RJ; Quintana PJE; Floro J; Gastanaga VM; Samimi BS; Kleinman MT; Liu L-JS; Bufalino C; Wu C"F;
McLaren CE. (2004). Association of FEV1 in asthmatic children with personal and microenvironmental
exposure to airborne particulate matter. Environ Health Perspect, 112: 932-941. 056897
Delfino RJ; Staimer N; Gillen D; Tjoa T; Sioutas C; Fung K; George SC; Kleinman MT. (2006). Personal and
ambient air pollution is associated with increased exhaled nitric oxide in children with asthma. Environ
Health Perspect, 114: 1736-1743. 090745
Delfino RJ; Staimer N; Tjoa T; Polidori A; Arhami M; Gillen DL; Kleinman MT; Vaziri ND; Longhurst J;
Zaldivar F; Sioutas C. (2008). Circulating biomarkers of inflammation, antioxidant activity, and platelet
activation are associated with primary combustion aerosols in subjects with coronary artery disease.
Environ Health Perspect, 116: 898-906. 156390
Delfino RJ; Zeiger RS; Seltzer JM; Street DH. (1998). Symptoms in pediatric asthmatics and air pollution:
differences in effects by symptom severity, anti-inflammatory medication use and particulate averaging
time. Environ Health Perspect, 106: 751-761. 051406
July 2009
E-682
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Delfino RJ; Zeiger RS; Seltzer JM; Street DH; McLaren CE. (2002). Association of asthma symptoms with peak
particulate air pollution and effect modification by anti"inflammatory medication use. Environ Health
Perspect, 110: A607-A617. 093740
DeMeo DL; Zanobetti A; Litonjua AA; Coull BA; Schwartz J; Gold DR. (2004). Ambient air pollution and oxygen
saturation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 170- 383-387. 087346
Desqueyroux H; Pujet J-C> Prosper Mi Squinazi Fi Momas I. (2002). Short-term effects of low-level air pollution
on respiratory health of adults suffering from moderate to severe asthma. Environ Res, 89- 29"37. 026052
de Hartog JJi Lanki Ti Timonen KLi Hoek Gi Janssen NAi Ibald-Mulli Ai Peters Ai Heinrich Ji Tarkiainen THi
van Grieken Ri van Wijnen JHi Brunekreef Bi Pekkanen J. (2009). Associations between PM2.5 and
heart rate variability are modified by particle composition and beta-blocker use in patients with coronary
heart disease. Environ Health Perspect, 117: 105-111. 191904
Diette GBi Hansel NNi Buckley TJi Curtin-Brosnan Ji Eggleston PAi Matsui ECi McCormack MCi Williams DLi
Breysse PN. (2007). Home indoor pollutant exposures among inner-city children with and without
asthma. Environ Health Perspect, 115: 1665-1669. 156399
Diez Roux AVi Auchincloss AHi Franklin TGi Raghunathan Ti Barr RGi Kaufman Ji Astor Bi Keeler J. (2008).
Long-term exposure to ambient particulate matter and prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis in the
Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Am J Epidemiol, 167: 667-675. 156401
Diez-Roux AVi Auchincloss AHi Astor Bi Barr RGi Cushman Mi Dvonch Ti Jacobs DR Jri Kaufman Ji Lin Xi
Samson Px. (2006). Recent exposure to particulate matter and C-reactive protein concentration in the
multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis x. Am J Epidemiol, 164: 437-448. 156400
Dominici Fi Daniels Mi McDermott Ai Zeger SLi Samet JM. (2003). Shape of the exposure-response relation and
mortality displacement in the NMMAPS database. 042804
Dominici Fi Peng RDi Bell MLi Pham Li McDermott Ai Zeger SLi Samet JL. (2006). Fine particulate air
pollution and hospital admission for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. JAMA, 295: 1127-1134.
088398
Dominici Fi Peng RDi Ebisu Ki Zeger SLi Samet JMi Bell ML. (2007). Does the effect of PM10 on mortality
depend on PM nickel and vanadium content? A reanalysis of the NMMAPS data. Environ Health
Perspect, 115: 1701-3. 099135
Dominici Fi Peng RDi Zeger SLi White RHi Samet JM. (2007). Particulate air pollution and mortality in the
United States: did the risks change from 1987 to 2000?. Am J Epidemiol, 166: 880-8. 097361
Dominici Fi Zanobetti Ai Zeger SLi Schwartz Ji Samet JM. (2004). Hierarchical bivariate time series models: a
combined analysis of the effects of particulate matter on morbidity and mortality. , 5- 341-60. 096951
Downs SHi Schindler C; Liu L-JSi Keidel Di Bayer-Oglesby Li Brutsche MHi Gerbase MWi Keller Ri Kunzli Ni
Leuenberger Pi Probst-Hensch NMi Tschopp J-Mi Zellweger J-Pi Rochat Ti Schwartz Ji Ackermann-
Liebrich U>. (2007). Reduced exposure to PM10 and attenuated age-related decline in lung function. , 15:
185-204. 092853
Dubowsky SDi Suh Hi Schwartz Ji Coull BA; Gold DR. (2006). Diabetes, obesity, and hypertension may enhance
associations between air pollution and markers of systemic inflammation. Environ Health Perspect, 114:
992-998. 088750
Dugandzic RDodds L; Stieb D; Smith-Doiron M. (2006). The association between low level exposures to ambient
air pollution and term low birth weight: a retrospective cohort study. , 5- 3. 088681
Ebelt ST; Wilson WE; Brauer M. (2005). Exposure to ambient and nonambient components of particulate
matter: a comparison of health effects. Epidemiology, 16: 396-405. 056907
Eftim SE; Samet JM; Janes H; McDermott A; Dominici F. (2008). Fine particulate matter and mortality: a
comparison of the six cities and American Cancer Society cohorts with a medicare cohort. Epidemiology,
19: 209-216. 099104
El-Zein A; Nuwayhid I; El-Fadel M; Mroueh S. (2007). Did a ban on diesel-fuel reduce emergency respiratory
admissions for children?. Sci Total Environ, 384: 134-140. 093043
Enstrom JE. (2005). Fine particulate air pollution and total mortality among elderly Californians, 1973-2002.
Inhal Toxicol, 17: 803-816. 087356
Erbas B; Kelly A"M; Physick B; Code C; Edwards M. (2005). Air pollution and childhood asthma emergency
hospital admissions: estimating intra-city regional variations. Int J Environ Health Res, 15: 11-20.
073849
Fan Z; Meng Q; Weisel C; Laumbach R; Ohman-Strickland P; Shalat S; Hernandez M; Black K. (2008). Acute
exposure to elevated PM (2.5) generated by traffic and cardiopulmonary health effects in healthy older
adults. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 19: 525-533. 191979
Farhat SCL; Paulo RLP; Shimoda TM; Conceicao GMS; Lin CA; Braga ALF; Warth MPN; Saldiva PHN. (2005).
Effect of air pollution on pediatric respiratory emergency room visits and hospital admissions. Braz J
Med Biol Res, 38: 227-235. 089461
July 2009
E-683
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Ferdinands JM; Crawford CA; Greenwald R; Van Sickle D; Hunter E; Teague WG. (2008). Breath acidification
in adolescent runners exposed to atmospheric pollution- a prospective, repeated measures observational
study. Environ Health, 7- 10. 156433
Filleul L; Rondeau V; Vandentorren S; Le Moual N> Cantagrel A; Annesi-Maesano I; Charpin D; Declercq Ci
Neukirch F> Paris Ci Vervloet Di Brochard Pi Tessier JFi Kauffmann Fi Baldi I. (2005). Twenty five year
mortality and air pollution - results from the French PAARC survey. Occup Environ Med, 62- 453-460.
087357
Fischer Pi Hoek Gi Brunekreef Bi Verhoeff Ai van Wijnen J. (2003). Air pollution and mortality in the
Netherlands' are the elderly more at risk?. Eur Respir J, 40- 34S-38S. 043739
Fischer PHi Brunekreef Bi Lebret E. (2004). Air pollution related deaths during the 2003 heat wave in the
Netherlands. Atmos Environ, 38- 1083-1085. 055605
Fischer SLi Koshland CP. (2007). Daily and peak 1 h indoor air pollution and driving factors in a rural Chinese
village. Environ Sci Technol, 41- 3121-3126. 156435
Folino AFi Scapellato ML; Canova Ci Maestrelli Pi Bertorelli Gi Simonato Li Iliceto Si Lotti M. (2009).
Individual exposure to particulate matter and the short-term arrhythmic and autonomic profiles in
patients with myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J, 30: 1614-1620. 191902
Forastiere Fi Stafoggia Mi Berti Gi Bisanti Li Cernigliaro Ai Chiusolo Mi Mallone Si Miglio Ri Pandolfi Pi
Rognoni Mi Serinelli Mi Tessari Ri Vigotti Mi Perucci C. (2008). Particulate Matter and Daily Mortality:
A Case-Crossover Analysis of Individual Effect Modifiers. Epidemiology, 19: 571-580. 186937
Forastiere Fi Stafoggia Mi Picciotto Si Bellander Ti D'Ippoliti Di Lanki Ti Von Klot Si Nyberg Fi Paatero Pi
Peters Ai Pekkanen Ji Sunyer Ji Perucci CA. (2005). A case-crossover analysis of out-of-hospital coronary
deaths and air pollution in Rome, Italy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 172: 1549-1555. 086323
Forastiere Fi Stafoggia Mi Tasco Ci Picciotto Si Agabiti Ni Cesaroni Gi Perucci CA. (2007). Socioeconomic status,
particulate air pollution, and daily mortality: differential exposure or differential susceptibility. Am J Ind
Med, 50: 208-216. 090720
Forbes LJi Patel MDi Rudnicka ARi Cook DGi Bush Ti Stedman JRi Whincup PHi Strachan DPi Anderson RH.
(2009). Chronic exposure to outdoor air pollution and markers of systemic inflammation. Epidemiology,
20: 245-253. 190351
Forsberg Bi Segerstedt Bi Stjernberg Ni Roemer W. (1998). Air pollution and respiratory health of children: the
PEACE panel study in Umea, Sweden. , 8: 12-19. 051714
Franklin Mi Koutrakis Pi Schwartz J. (2008). PM25 composition & daily mortality in 25 US communities.
097426
Franklin Mi Zeka Ai Schwartz J. (2007). Association between PM2.5 and all-cause and specific-cause mortality
in 27 US communities. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 17: 279-287. 091257
Fuentes Mi Song HRi Ghosh SKi Holland DMi Davis JM. (2006). Spatial association between speciated fine
particles and mortality. Biometrics, 62: 855-63. 097647
Fung KYi Khan Si Krewski Di Chen Y. (2006). Association between air pollution and multiple respiratory
hospitalizations among the elderly in Vancouver, Canada. Inhal Toxicol, 18: 1005-1011. 089789
Fung KYi Luginaah IKMGi Webster G. (2005). Air pollution and daily hospitalization rates for cardiovascular
and respiratory diseases in London, Ontario. Int J Environ Stud, 62: 677-685. 093262
Galan L Tobias Ai Banegas JRi Aranguez E. (2003). Short-term effects of air pollution on daily asthma
emergency room admissions. Eur Respir J, 22: 802-808. 087408
Gauderman WJi Avol Ei Gilliland Fi Vora Hi Thomas Di Berhane Ki McConnell Ri Kuenzli Ni Lurmann Fi
Rappaport Ei Margolis Hi Bates Di Peters J. (2004). The effect of air pollution on lung development from
10 to 18 years of age. N Engl J Med, 351: 1057-1067. 056569
Gauderman WJi Gilliland GFi Vora Hi Avol Ei Stram Di McConnell Ri Thomas Di Lurmann Fi Margolis HGi
Rappaport EBi Berhane Ki Peters JM. (2002). Association between air pollution and lung function
growth in southern California children: results from a second cohort. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 166:
76-84. 026013
Gauderman WJi McConnell Ri Gilliland Fi London Si Thomas Di Avol Ei Vora Hi Berhane Ki Rappaport EBi
Lurmann Fi Margolis HGi Peters J. (2000). Association between air pollution and lung function growth in
southern California children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 162: 1383-1390. 012531
Gauderman WJi Vora Hi McConnell Ri Berhane Ki Gilliland Fi Thomas Di Lurmann Fi Avol Ei Kunzli N.
(2007). Effect of exposure to traffic on lung development from 10 to 18 years of age: a cohort study.
Lancet, 369: 571-577. 090121
Gehring Ui Cyrys Ji Sedlmeir Gi Brunekreef Bi Bellander Ti Fischer Pi Bauer CP; Reinhardt Di Wichmann HE;
Heinrich J. (2002). Traffic-related air pollution and respiratory health during the first 2 yrs of life. Eur
Respir J, 19: 690-698. 036250
July 2009
E-684
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Gent JF; Koutrakis P; Belanger K; Triche E; Holford TR; Bracken MB; Leaderer BP. (2009). Symptoms and
medication use in children with asthma and traffic-related sources of fine particle pollution. Environ
Health Perspect, In Press: 1-41. 180399
Gent JF; Triche EW; Holford TR; Belanger K; Bracken MB; Beckett WS; Leaderer BP. (2003). Association of
lowlevel ozone and fine particles with respiratory symptoms in children with asthma. JAMA, 290: 1859"
1867. 052885
Gilboa SM; Mendola P; Olshan AF; Langlois PH; Savitz DA; Loomis D; Herring AH; Fixler DE. (2005). Relation
between ambient air quality and selected birth defects, seven county study, Texas, 1997-2000. Am J
Epidemiol, 162: 238-252. 087892
Girardot SP; Ryan PB; Smith SM; Davis WT; Hamilton CB; Obenour RA; Renfro JR; Tromatore KA; Reed GD.
(2006). Ozone and PM25 exposure and acute pulmonary health effects: a study of hikers in the Great
Smoky Mountains National Park. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 612-617. 088271
Goldberg MS; Burnett RT; Valois M"F; Flegel K; Bailar JC III; Brook J; Vincent R; Radon K. (2003).
Associations between ambient air pollution and daily mortality among persons with congestive heart
failure. Environ Res, 91: 8-20. 035202
Goldberg MS; Giannetti N; Burnett RT; Mayo NE; Valois MF; Brophy JM. (2008). A panel study in congestive
heart failure to estimate the short-term effects from personal factors and environmental conditions on
oxygen saturation and pulse rate. Occup Environ Med, 65: 659-666. 180380
Goncalves FLT; Carvalho LMV Conde FC; Latorre MRDO; Saldiva PHN; Braga ALF. (2005). The effects of air
pollution and meteorological parameters on respiratory morbidity during the summer in Sao Paulo City.
Environ Int, 31: 343-349. 089884
Gordian ME; Choudhury AH. (2003). PM10 and asthma medication in schoolchildren. Arch Environ Occup
Health, 58: 42-47. 054842
Goss CH; Newsom SA; Schildcrout JS; Sheppard L; Kaufman JD. (2004). Effect of ambient air pollution on
pulmonary exacerbations and lung function in cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 169: 816-821.
055624
Gouveia N> Bremner SA; Novaes HMD. (2004). Association between ambient air pollution and birth weight in
Sao Paulo, Brazil. J Epidemiol Community Health, 58: 11-17. 055613
Ha E-H; Lee J-T; Kim H; Hong Y-C; Lee. (2003). Infant susceptibility of mortality to air pollution in Seoul,
South Korea. , 111: 284-290. 042552
Hajat S; Anderson HR; Atkinson RW! Haines A. (2002). Effects of air pollution on general practitioner
consultations for upper respiratory diseases in London. Occup Environ Med, 59: 294-299. 030358
Halonen JI; Lanki T; Yli-Tuomi T; Kulmala M; Tiittanen P; Pekkanen J. (2008). Urban air pollution, and
asthma and COPD hospital emergency room visits. Thorax, 63: 635-41. 189507
Halonen JI; Lanki T; Yli-Tuomi T; Tiittanen P; Kulmala M; Pekkanen. (2009). Particulate air pollution and
acute cardiorespiratory hospital admissions and mortality among the elderly. Epidemiology, 20: 143-153.
180379
Hanigan IC; Johnston FH; Morgan GG. (2008). Vegetation fire smoke, indigenous status and cardio respiratory
hospital admissions in Darwin, Australia, 1996-2005: a time-series study. , T- 42. 156518
Hansen C; Neller A; Williams G; Simpson R. (2006). Maternal exposure to low levels of ambient air pollution
and preterm birth in Brisbane, Australia. BJOG, 113: 935-941. 089818
Hansen C; Neller A; Williams G; Simpson R. (2007). Low levels of ambient air pollution during pregnancy and
fetal growth among term neonates in Brisbane, Australia. Environ Res, 103: 383-389. 090703
Hansen CA; Barnett AG; Jalaludin B; Morgan G. (2009). Ambient air pollution and birth defects in brisbane,
Australia. , 4- e5408. 192362
Hapcioglu B; Issever H; Kocyigit E; Disci R; Vatansever S; Ozdilli K. (2006). The effect of air pollution and
meteorological parameters on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at an Istanbul hospital. Indoor Built
Environ, 15: 147-153. 093263
Harre ESM; Price PD; Ayrey RB; Toop LJ; Martin IR; Town GI. (1997). Respiratory effects of air pollution in
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a three month prospective study. Thorax, 52: 1040-1044. 095726
Hastings DL; Jardine S. (2002). The relationship between air particulate levels and upper respiratory disease in
soldiers deployed to Bosnia (1997-1998). Mil Med, 167: 296-303. 030344
Henrotin JB; Besancenot JP; Bejot Y; Giroud M. (2007). Short-term effects of ozone air pollution on ischaemic
stroke occurrence: a case-crossover analysis from a 10-year population-based study in Dijon, France.
Occup Environ Med, 64: 439-445. 093270
Hertz-Picciotto I; Baker RJ; Yap PS; Dostal M; Joad JP; Lipsett M; Greenfield T; Herr CE; Benes I; Shumway
RH; Pinkerton KE; Sram R. (2007). Early childhood lower respiratory illness and air pollution, [see
comment]. Environ Health Perspect, 115: 1510-8. 135917
July 2009
E-685
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Hertz-Picciotto I; Herr CE; Yap PS; Dostal Mi Shumway RHi Ashwood Pi Lipsett Mi Joad JPi Pinkerton KEi
Sram RJ. (2005). Air pollution and lymphocyte phenotype proportions in cord blood. Environ Health
Perspect, 113: 1391-1398. 088678
Hinwood ALi De Klerk Ni Rodriguez Ci Jacoby Pi Runnion Ti Rye Pi Landau Li Murray Fi Feldwick Mi Spickett
J. (2006). The relationship between changes in daily air pollution and hospitalizations in Perth, Australia
1992-1998: a case-crossover study. Int J Environ Health Res, 16: 27"46. 088976
Hirshon JMi Shardell Mi Alles Si Powell JLi Squibb Ki Ondov Ji Blaisdell CJ. (2008). Elevated ambient air zinc
increases pediatric asthma morbidity. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 826-831. 180375
Ho W-Ci Hartley WRi Myers Li Lin M-Hi. (2007). Air pollution, weather, and associated risk factors related to
asthma prevalence and attack rate. Environ Res, 104: 402-409. 093265
Hoffmann Bi Moebus Si Kroger Ki Stang Ai Mohlenkamp Si Dragano Ni Schmermund Ai Memmesheimer Mi
Erbel Ri Jockel K"H. (2009). Residential exposure to urban pollution, ankle "brachial index, and
peripheral arterial disease. Epidemiology, 20: 280-288. 190376
Hoffmann Bi Moebus Si Mohlenkamp Si Stang Ai Lehmann Ni Dragano Ni Schmermund Ai Memmesheimer Mi
Mann Ki Erbel Ri Jockel K"Hi Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study Investigative Group. (2007). Residential
exposure to traffic is associated with coronary atherosclerosis. Circulation, 116: 489-496. 091163
Hoffmann Bi Moebus Si Stang Ai Beck E"Mi Dragano Ni Mohlenkamp Si Schmermund Ai Memmesheimer Mi
Mann Ki Erbel Ri Jockel K"Hi Heinz Nixdorf RECALL Study Investigative Group. (2006). Residence
close to high traffic and prevalence of coronary heart disease. Eur Heart J, 27: 2696-2702. 091162
Hogervorst JGi de Kok TMi Briede JJi Wesseling Gi Kleinjans JCi van Schayck CP. (2006). Relationship
between radical generation by urban ambient particulate matter and pulmonary function of school
children. , 69: 245-62. 189460
Hogervorst JGi de Kok TMi Briede JJi Wesseling Gi Kleinjans JCi van Schayck CP. (2006). Relationship
between radical generation by urban ambient particulate matter and pulmonary function of school
children. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 69: 245-262. 156559
Holguin Fi Flores Si Ross Zi Cortez Mi Molina Mi Molina Li Rincon Ci Jerrett Mi Berhane Ki Granados Ai
Romieu I. (2007). Traffic-related exposures, airway function, inflammation, and respiratory symptoms in
children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 176: 1236-42. 099000
Holloman CHi Bortnick SMi Morara Mi Strauss WJi Calder CA. (2004). A Bayesian hierarchical approach for
relating PM2.5 exposure to cardiovascular mortliaty in North Carolina. Environ Health Perspect, 112:
1282-1288. 087375
Hong CYi Chia SE; Widjaja D; Saw SM; Lee J; Munoz C; Koh D. (2004). Prevalence of Respiratory Symptoms in
Children and Air Quality by Village in Rural Indonesia. J Occup Environ Med, 46: 1174. 156565
Hong Y-C; Hwang S-S; Kim JH; Lee K-H; Lee H-J; Lee K-H; Yu S-D; Kim D-S. (2007). Metals in particulate
pollutants affect peak expiratory flow of schoolchildren. Environ Health Perspect, 115: 430-434. 091347
Hopke PE Ito E Mar T; Christensen WF; Eatough DJ; Henry RC; Kim E; Laden F; Lall R; Larson TV; Liu H;
Neas L; Pinto J; Stolzel M; Suh H; Paatero P; Thurston GD. (2006). PM source apportionment and health
effects: 1 Intercomparison of source apportionment results. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 16: 275-286.
088390
Horak F Jri Studnicka M; Gartner C; Spengler JD; Tauber E; Urbanek R; Veiter A; Frischer T. (2002).
Particulate matter and lung function growth in children: a 3-yr follow-up study in Austrian
schoolchildren. Eur Respir J, 19: 838-845. 034792
Host S; Larrieu S; Pascal L; Blanchard M; Declercq C; Fabre P; Jusot JF; Chardon B; Le Tertre A; Wagner V;
Prouvost H; Lefranc A. (2007). Short-term Associations between Fine and Coarse Particles and
Cardiorespiratory Hospitalizations in Six French Cities. Occup Environ Med. 155851
Host S; Larrieu S; Pascal L; Blanchard M; Declercq C; Fabre P; Jusot JF; Chardon B; Le Tertre A; Wagner V;
Prouvost H; Lefranc A. (2008). Short-term associations between fine and coarse particles and hospital
admissions for cardiorespiratory diseases in six French cities. Occup Environ Med, 65: 544-551. 155852
Hwang B-F; Jaakkola JJK; Lee Y"L; Lin Y"C; Guo Y-LL. (2006). Relation between air pollution and allergic
rhinitis in Taiwanese schoolchildren. Respir Res, T- 23. 088971
Hwang J-S; Chan C"C. (2002). Effects of air pollution on daily clinic visits for lower respiratory tract illness. Am
J Epidemiol, 155: 1-10. 023222
Hwang K-W; Lee J-H; Jeong D"Y; Lee C"H; Bhatnagar A; Park J-M; Kim S"H. (2008). Observation of difference
in the size distribution of carbon and major inorganic compounds of atmospheric aerosols after the long-
range transport between the selected days of winter and summer. Atmos Environ, 42: 1057-1063. 134420
Ibald-Mulli A; Timonen KL; Peters A; Heinrich J; Wolke G; Lanki T; Buzorius G; Kreyling WG; De Hartog J;
Hoek G; Ten Brink HM; Pekkanen J. (2004). Effects of particulate air pollution on blood pressure and
heart rate in subjects with cardiovascular disease: a multicenter approach. Environ Health Perspect, 112:
369-377. 087415
July 2009
E-686
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Ingle ST; Pachpande BG; Wagh ND; Patel VS; Attarde SB. (2005). Exposure to vehicular pollution and
respiratory impairment of traffic policemen in Jalgaon City, India. , 43- 656-662. 089014
Islam T; Gauderman WJ; Berhane K; McConnell R; Avol E; Peters JM; Gilliland FD. (2007). The relationship
between air pollution, lung function and asthma in adolescents. Thorax, 62- 957-963. 090697
Issever H; Disci R; Hapcioglu B; Vatansever S> Karan M A; Akkaya V; Erk O. (2005). The effect of air pollution
and meteorological parameters in Istanbul on hospital admissions for acute coronary syndrome. Indoor
Built Environ, 14: 157-164. 097736
Ito E Christensen WF; Eatough DJ; Henry RC; Kim E; Laden F; Lall R; Larson TV; Neas L; Hopke PK;
Thurston GD. (2006). PM source apportionment and health effects: 2 An investigation of intermethod
variability in associations between source-apportioned fine particle mass and daily mortality in
Washington, DC. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 16: 300-310. 088391
Jaffe DH; Singer ME; Rimm AA. (2003). Air pollution and emergency department visits for asthma among Ohio
Medicaid recipients, 1991-1996. Environ Res, 91: 21-28. 041957
Jalaludin B; Mannes T; Morgan G; Lincoln D; Sheppeard V; Corbett S. (2007). Impact of ambient air pollution
on gestational age is modified by season in Sydney, Australia. , 6: 16. 156601
Jalaludin B; Morgan G; Lincoln D; Sheppeard V; Simpson R; Corbett S. (2006). Associations between ambient
air pollution and daily emergency department attendances for cardiovascular disease in the elderly (65+
years), Sydney, Australia. , 16: 225-37. 189416
Jalaludin BB; O'Toole BI; Leeder SR. (2004). Acute effects of urban ambient air pollution on respiratory
symptoms, asthma medication use, and doctor visits for asthma in a cohort of Australian children.
Environ Res, 95: 32-42. 056595
Janes H; Dominici F; Zeger SL. (2007). Trends in air pollution and mortality: an approach to the assessment of
unmeasured confounding. Epidemiology, 18: 416-23. 090927
Jansen KL; Larson TV; Koenig JQ; Mar TF; Fields C; Stewart J; Lippmann M. (2005). Associations between
health effects and particulate matter and black carbon in subjects with respiratory disease. Environ
Health Perspect, 113: 1741-1746. 082236
Janssen NAH; Brunekreef B; van Vliet P; Aarts F; Maliefste K; Harssema H; Fischer P. (2003). The relationship
between air pollution from heavy traffic and allergic sensitization, bronchial byperresponsiveness, and
respiratory symptoms in Dutch schoolchildren. Epidemiology, 111: 1512-1518. 133555
Jedrychowski W; Masters E; Choi H; Sochacka E; Flak E; Mroz E; Pac A; Jacek R; Kaim I; Skolicki Z; Spengler
JD; Perera F. (2007). Pre-pregnancy dietary vitamin A intake may alleviate the adverse birth outcomes
associated with prenatal pollutant exposure: epidemiologic cohort study in Poland. Int J Occup Environ
Health, 13: 175-180. 156607
Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Pope CA III! Krewski D; Newbold KB; Thurston G; Shi Y; Finkelstein N; Calle
EE; Thun MJ. (2005). Spatial analysis of air pollution and mortality in Los Angeles. Epidemiology, 16:
727-736. 087600
Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Willis A; Krewski D; Goldberg MS; DeLuca P; Finkelstein N. (2003). Spatial analysis of
the air pollution-mortality relationship in the context of ecologic confounders. J Toxicol Environ Health
A, 66: 1735-1777. 087380
Johnston FH; Bailie RS; Pilotto LS; Hanigan IC. (2007). Ambient biomass smoke and cardio-respiratory hospital
admissions in Darwin, Australia. , !'¦ 240. 155882
Johnston FH; Webby RJ; Pilotto LS; Bailie RS; Parry DL; Halpin SJ. (2006). Vegetation fires, particulate air
pollution and asthma: a panel study in the Australian monsoon tropics. Int J Environ Health Res, 16:
391-404. 091386
Just J; Segala C; Sahraoui F; Priol G; Grimfeld A; Neukirch F. (2002). Short-term health effects of particulate
and photochemical air pollution in asthmatic children. Eur Respir J, 20: 899-906. 035429
Kaiser R; Romieu I; Medina S; Schwartz J; Krzyzanowski M; Kunzli N. (2004). Air pollution attributable
postneonatal infant mortality in US metropolitan areas: a risk assessment study. Retrieved , from .
076674
Kan H-D; Chen B"H. (2003). Air pollution and daily mortality in Shanghai: a time series study. Arch Environ
Occup Health, 58: 360-367. 087372
Kan H-D; Chen B"H; Fu C-W; Yu S"Z; Mu L-N. (2005). Relationship between ambient air pollution and daily
mortality of SARS in Beijing. Biomed Environ Sci, 18: 1-4. 087561
Kan H; Heiss G; Rose KM; Whitsel E; Lurmann F; London SJ. (2007). Traffic exposure and lung function in
adults: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. Thorax, 62: 873-879. 091383
Kan H; London SJ; Chen G; Zhang Y; Song G; Zhao N; Jiang L; Chen B. (2007). Differentiating the effects of
fine and coarse particles on daily mortality in Shanghai, China. Environ Int, 33: 376-384. 091267
July 2009
E-687
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Kan H; London SJ; Chen G> Zhang Yi Song G> Zhao N> Jiang L> Chen B. (2008). Season, sex, age, and education
as modifiers of the effects of outdoor air pollution on daily mortality in Shanghai, China- The Public
Health and Air Pollution in Asia (PAPA) Study. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 1183-1188. 156621
Karr Ci Lumley Ti Schreuder A; Davis R; Larson Ti Ritz B> Kaufman J. (2007). Effects of subchronic and chronic
exposure to ambient air pollutants on infant bronchiolitis. Am J Epidemiol, 165: 553-560. 090719
Kasamatsu J; Shima M> Yamazaki Si Tamura Ki Sun G. (2006). Effects of winter air pollution on pulmonary
function of school children in Shenyang, China. Int J Hyg Environ Health, 209: 435-444. 156627
Kaufman Y. (1987). Satellite sensing of aerosol absorption. J Geophys Res, 92: 4307-4317. 190960
Keatinge WRi Donaldson GC. (2006). Heat acclimatization and sunshine cause false indications of mortality due
to ozone. Environ Res, 100: 387-393. 087536
Kettunen Ji Lanki Ti Tiittanen Pi Aalto PPi Koskentalo Ti Kulmala Mi Salomaa Vi Pekkanen J. (2007).
Associations of fine and ultrafine particulate air pollution with stroke mortality in an area of low air
pollution levels. Stroke, 38: 918-922. 091242
Kim CGi Bell JNBi Power SA. (2003). Effects of soil cadmium on Pinus sylvestris L. seedlings. Plant Soil, 257:
443-449. 155899
Kim Hi Lee J-T; Hong Y-C; Yi S-MJ Kim Y. (2004). Evaluating the effect of daily PM10 variation on mortality.
Inhal Toxicol, l: 55-58. 087417
Kim JH; Lim DH; Kim JK; Jeong SJ; Son BK. (2005). Effects of particulate matter (PM10) on the pulmonary
function of middle-school children. J Korean Med Sci, 20: 42-45. 087418
Kim JJ; Smorodinsky Si Lipsett Mi Singer BCi Hodgson ATi Ostro B. (2004). Traffic-related air pollution near
busy roads: the East Bay children's Respiratory Health Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 170: 520-526.
087383
Kim OJi Ha EH; Kim BM; Park HS; Jung WJ; Lee BE; Suh YJ; Kim YJ; Lee JT; Kim H; Hong YC. (2007). PM10
and pregnancy outcomes: a hospital-based cohort study of pregnant women in Seoul. J Occup Environ
Med, 49: 1394-1402. 156642
Kim SY; O'Neill MS; Lee JT; Cho YJ Kim J; Kim H. (2007). Air pollution, socioeconomic position, and emergency
hospital visits for asthma in Seoul, Korea. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 80: 701-710. 092837
KLemm RJ; Lipfert FW; Wyzga RE; Gust C. (2004). Daily mortality and air pollution in Atlanta: two years of
data from ARIES. Inhal Toxicol, 16 Suppl l: 131-141. 056585
Ko FWS; Tam W; Wong TW; Chan DPS. (2007). Temporal relationship between air pollutants and hospital
admissions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Hong Kong. Thorax, 62: 780-785. 091639
Ko FWS; Tam W; Wong TW; Lai CKW;. (2007). Effects of air pollution on asthma hospitalization rates in
different age groups in Hong Kong. Clin Exp Allergy, 37: 1312-1319. 092844
Koenig JQ; Jansen K; Mar TF; Lumley T; Kaufman J; Trenga CA; Sullivan J; Liu LJ; Shapiro GG; Larson TV.
(2003). Measurement of offline exhaled nitric oxide in a study of community exposure to air pollution.
Environ Health Perspect, 111: 1625-1629. 156653
Koken PJM; Piver WT; Ye F; Elixhauser A; Olsen LM; Portier CJ. (2003). Temperature, air pollution, and
hospitalization for cardiovascular diseases among elderly people in Denver. Environ Health Perspect,
111: 1312-1317. 049466
Kongtip P; Thongsuk WJ Yoosook W; Chantanakul S. (2006). Health effects of metropolitan traffic-related air
pollutants on street vendors. Atmos Environ, 40: 7138-7145. 096920
Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi YJ Turner MC; Pope AC III; Thurston G; Calle EE;
Thun MJ. (2009). Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking
particulate air pollution and mortality. Health Effects Institute. Cambridge, MA. 140. 191193
Kulkarni N; Pierse N; Rushton L; Grigg J. (2006). Carbon in airway macrophages and lung function in children.
, 355: 21-30. 089257
Kumar R; Sharma M; Srivastva A; Thakur JS; Jindal SK; Parwana HK. (2004). Association of outdoor air
pollution with chronic respiratory morbidity in an industrial town in northern India. Arch Environ Occup
Health, 59: 471-477. 089873
Kunzli N; Jerrett M; Mack WJ; Beckerman B; LaBree L; Gilliland F; Thomas D; Peters J; Hodis HN. (2005).
Ambient air pollution and atherosclerosis in Los Angeles. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 201-206. 087387
Kuo HW; Lai JS; Lee MC; Tai RC; Lee MC. (2002). Respiratory effects of air pollutants among asthmatics in
central Taiwan. Arch Environ Occup Health, 57: 194-200. 036310
Laden F; Schwartz J; Speizer FE; Dockery DW. (2006). Reduction in fine particulate air pollution and mortality:
extended follow-up of the Harvard Six Cities study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 173: 667-672. 087605
Lagorio S; Forastiere F; Pistelli R; Iavarone I; Michelozzi P; Fano V; Marconi A; Ziemacki G; Ostro BD. (2006).
Air pollution and lung function among susceptible adult subjects: a panel study. ,5' 11. 089800
Langley-Turnbaugh SJ; Gordon NR; Lambert T. (2005). Airborne particulates and asthma: a Maine case study.
Toxicol Ind Health, 21: 75-92. 093269
July 2009
E-688
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Langrish JP; Mills NL; Chan JK; Leseman DL; Aitken RJ; Fokkens PH; Cassee FR; Li J; Donaldson Ki Newby
DE; Jiang L. (2009). Beneficial cardiovascular effects of reducing exposure to particulate air pollution
with a simple facemask. Part Fibre Toxicol, 6- 8. 191908
Lanki Ti De Hartog JJ; Heinrich J; Hoek Gi Janssen NAH; Peters A; Stolzel Mi Timonen KLi Vallius Mi
Vanninen Ei Pekkanen J. (2006). Can we identify sources of fine particles responsible for exercise-
induced ischemia on days with elevated air pollution? The ULTRA study. Environ Health Perspect, 114:
655-660. 088412
Lanki Ti Hoek Gi Timonen Ki Peters Ai Tiittanen Pi Vanninen Ei Pekkanen J. (2008). Hourly variation in fine
particle exposure is associated with transiently increased risk of ST segment depression. Br Med J, 65-
782. 191984
Lanki Ti Pekkanen Ji Aalto Pi Elosua Ri Berglind Ni D'Ippoliti Di Kulmala Mi Nyberg Fi Peters Ai Picciotto Si
Salomaa Vi Sunyer Ji Tiittanen Pi Von KLot Si Forastiere Fi for the HEAPSS Study Group. (2006).
Associations of traffic-related air pollutants with hospitalisation for first acute myocardial infarction- the
HEAPSS study. Occup Environ Med, 63- 844-851. 089788
Larrieu Si Jusot J-Fi Blanchard Mi Prouvost Hi Declercq Ci Fabre Pi Pascal Li Le Tertre Ai Wagner Vi Riviere
Si Chardon Bi Borelli Di Cassadou Si Eilstein Di Le franc A. (2007). Short term effects of air pollution on
hospitalizations for cardiovascular diseases in eight French cities' The PSAS program. Sci Total Environ,
387: 105-112. 093031
Laurent Oi Pedrono Gi Segala Ci Filleul Li Havard Si Deguen Si Schillinger Ci Riviere Ei Bard D. (2008). Air
pollution, asthma attacks, and socioeconomic deprivation: a small-area case-crossover study. Am J
Epidemiol, 168: 58-65. 156672
Le Tertre Ai Medina Si Samoli Ei Forsberg Bi Michelozzi Pi Boumghar Ai Vonk JMi Bellini Ai Atkinson Ri Ayres
JGi Sunyer Ji Schwartz Ji Katsouyanni K. (2002). Short term effects of particulate air pollution on
cardiovascular diseases in eight European cities. J Epidemiol Community Health, 56: 773-779. 023746
Le Tertre Ai Schwartz Ji Touloumi G. (2005). Empirical Bayes and adjusted estimates approach to estimating
the relation of mortality to eposure of PM10. Risk Anal, 25: 711-718. 087560
Lee BE; Ha EH; Park HS; Kim YJ; Hong YC; Kim H; Lee JT. (2003). Exposure to air pollution during different
gestational phases contributes to risks of low birth weight. Hum Reprod, 18: 638-643. 043202
Lee D; Shaddick G. (2007). Time-varying coefficient models for the analysis of air pollution and health outcome
data. Biometrics, 63: 1253-1261. 156685
Lee IM; Tsai SS; Ho CK; Chiu HF; Wu TN; Yang CY. (2008). Air pollution and hospital admissions for
congestive heart failure: are there potentially sensitive groups?. Environ Res, 108: 348-353. 192076
Lee J-T; Kim H; Song H; Hong Y-C; Cho Y-S; Shin S-Y; Hyun Y-J; Kim Y-S. (2002). Air pollution and asthma
among children in Seoul, Korea. , 13: 481-484. 034826
Lee J-T; Son J-Y; Cho Y"S. (2007). A comparison of mortality related to urban air particles between periods with
Asian dust days and without Asian dust days in Seoul, Korea, 2000-2004. Environ Res, 105: 409-13.
093042
Lee JT; Kim H; Cho YS; Hong YC; Ha EH; Park H. (2003). Air pollution and hospital admissions for ischemic
heart diseases among individuals 64+ years of age residing in Seoul, Korea. , 58: 617-623. 095552
Lee SL; Wong WHS; Lau YL. (2006). Association between air pollution and asthma admission among children in
Hong Kong. Clin Exp Allergy, 36: 1138-1146. 090176
Leem J-H; Kaplan BM; Shim YK; Pohl HR; Gotway CA; Bullard SM; Rogers JF; Smith MM; Tylenda CA. (2006).
Exposures to air pollutants during pregnancy and preterm delivery. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 905"
910. 089828
Leonardi GS; Houthuijs D; Steerenberg PA; Fletcher T; Armstrong B; Antova T; Lochman I; Lochmanova A;
Rudnai P; Erdei E; Musial J; Jazwiec-Kanyion B; Niciu EM; Durbaca S; Fabianova E; Koppova K; Lebret
E; Brunekreef B; Van Loveren H. (2000). Immune biomarkers in relation to exposure to particulate
matter: a cross-sectional survey in 17 cities of central Europe. Inhal Toxicol, 12: 1-14. 010272
Letz AG; Quinn JM. (2005). Relationship of basic military trainee emergency department visits for asthma and
San Antonio air quality. Allergy Asthma Proc, 26: 463-467. 088752
Lewis TC; Robins TG; Dvonch JT; Keeler GJ; Yip FY; Mentz GB; Lin X; Parker EA; Israel BA; Gonzalez L; Hill
Y. (2005). Air pollution-associated changes in lung function among asthmatic children in Detroit. Environ
Health Perspect, 113: 1068-1075. 081079
Liao D; Duan Y; Whitsel EA; Zheng Z-J; Heiss G; Chinchilli VM; Lin H-M. (2004). Association of higher levels of
ambient criteria pollutants with impaired cardiac autonomic control: a population-based study. Am J
Epidemiol, 159: 768-777. 056590
Liao D; Heiss G; Chinchilli VM; Duan Y; Folsom AR; Lin HM; Salomaa V. (2005). Association of criteria
pollutants with plasma hemostatic/inflammatory markers: a population-based study. J Expo Sci Environ
Epidemiol, 15: 319-328. 088677
July 2009
E-689
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Liao KJ; Tagaris E; Manomaiphiboon K; Napelenok SL; Woo JH; He S; Amar P; Russell AG. (2007).
Sensitivities of Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter Formation toEmissions under the Impact of Potential
Future Climate Change. Environ Sci Technol, 41- 8355-8361. 180272
Lichtenfels AJFC; Gomes JB; Pieri PC; Miraglia SGEK; Hallak J; Saldiva PHN. (2007). Increased levels of air
pollution and a decrease in the human and mouse male-to-female ration in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Fertil
SterH, 87: 230-232. 097041
Lin C-M; Li C-Y> Mao I-F. (2004). Increased risks of term low "birth-weight infants in a petrochemical industrial
city with high air pollution levels. Arch Environ Occup Health, 59: 663-668. 089827
Lin CA; Pereira LAA; Nishioka DC; Conceicao GMS; Graga ALF; Saldiva PHN. (2004). Air pollution and
neonatal deaths in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Braz J Med Biol Res, 37: 765-770. 095787
Lin M; Chen Y; Burnett RT; Villeneuve PJ; Krewski D. (2002). The influence of ambient coarse particulate
matter on asthma hospitalization in children: case-crossover and time-series analyses. Environ Health
Perspect, 110: 575-581. 026067
Lin M; Stieb DM; Chen Y. (2005). Coarse particulate matter and hospitalization for respiratory infections in
children younger than 15 years in Toronto: a case-crossover analysis. , 116: 235-240. 087828
Lin Y-C; Lee C-FJ Fang T. (2008). Characterization of particle size distribution from diesel engines fueled with
palm-biodiesel blends and paraffinic fuel blends. Atmos Environ, 42: 1133-1143. 126812
Linares CJ Diaz J; Tob?as A; Migue JMDei Otero A. (2006). Impact of urban air pollutants and noise levels over
daily hospital admissions in children in Madrid: a time series analysis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health,
79: 143-152. 092846
Lipfert FW; Baty JD; Miller JP; Wyzga RE. (2006). PM2.5 constituents and related air quality variables as
predictors of survival in a cohort of U.S. military veterans. , 18: 645-57. 189271
Lipfert FW; Baty JD; Miller JP; Wyzga RE. (2006). PM2.5 constituents and related air quality variables as
predictors of survival in a cohort of U.S. military veterans. Inhal Toxicol, 18: 645-657. 088756
Lipfert FW; Wyzga RE; Baty JD; Miller JP. (2006). Traffic density as a surrogate measure of environmental
exposures in studies of air pollution health effects: long-term mortality in a cohort of US veterans. Atmos
Environ, 40: 154-169. 088218
Lipfert FW; Zhang J; Wyzga RE. (2000). Infant mortality and air pollution: a comprehensive analysis of US data
for 1990. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 50: 1350-1366. 004103
Lippmann M; Ito K; Hwang JS; Maciejczyk P; Chen LC. (2006). Cardiovascular effects of nickel in ambient air.
Environ Health Perspect, 114: 1662-9. 091165
Lipsett MJ; Tsai FC; Roger L; Woo M; Ostro BD. (2006). Coarse particles and heart rate variability among older
adults with coronary artery disease in the Coachella Valley, California. Environ Health Perspect, 114:
1215-1220. 088753
Lisabeth LD; Escobar JD; Dvonch JT; Sanchez BN; Majersik JJ; Brown DL; Smith MA; Morgenstern LB. (2008).
Ambient air pollution and risk for ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. , 64: 53"59. 155939
Liu CC; Chen CC; Wu TN; Yang CY. (2008). Association of brain cancer with residential exposure to
petrochemical air pollution in Taiwan. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 71: 310-314. 156708
Liu CC; Tsai SS; Chiu HF; Wu TN; Chen CC; Yang CY. (2009). Ambient exposure to criteria air pollutants and
risk of death from bladder cancer in Taiwan. , 21: 48"54. 190292
Liu L; Poon R; Chen L; Frescura AM; Montuschi P; Ciabattoni G; Wheeler A; Dales R. (2009). Acute effects of
air pollution on pulmonary function, airway inflammation, and oxidative stress in asthmatic children.
Environ Health Perspect, 117: 668-674. 192003
Liu L; Ruddy TD; Dalipaj M; Szyszkowicz M; You H; Poon R; Wheeler A; Dales R. (2007). Influence of personal
exposure to particulate air pollution on cardiovascular physiology and biomarkers of inflammation and
oxidative stress in subjects with diabetes. J Occup Environ Med, 49: 258-265. 156705
Liu S; Krewski D; Shi Y; Chen Y; Burnett R. (2007). Association between maternal exposure to ambient air
pollutants during pregnancy and fetal growth restriction. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 17: 426-432.
090429
Ljungman P; Bellander T; Schneider A; Breitner S; Forastiere F; Hampel R; Illig T; Jacquemin B; Katsouyanni
K; von Klot S. (2009). Modification of the interleukin-6 response to air pollution by interleukin-6 and
fibrinogen polymorphisms. Environ Health Perspect, 0800370: 1-31. 191983
Ljungman PLS; Berglind N; Holmgren C; Gadler F; Edvardsson N; Pershagen G; Rosenqvist M; Sjogren B;
Bellander T. (2008). Rapid effects of air pollution on ventricular arrhythmias. Eur Heart J, 29: 2894"
2901. 180266
Llorca J; Salas A; Prieto-Salceda D; Chinchon-Bengoechea V; Delgado-Rodriguez M. (2005). Nitrogen dioxide
increases cardiorespiratory admissions in Torrelavega (Spain). J Environ Health, 68: 30-35. 087825
Loomis D; Castillejos M; Gold DR; McDonnell W', Borja-Aburto VH. (1999). Air pollution and infant mortality in
Mexico City. Epidemiology, 10: 118-123. 087288
July 2009
E-690
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Lubinski W> Toczynska L Chcialowski A; Plusa T. (2005). Influence of air pollution on pulmonary function in
healthy young men from different regions of Poland. Ann Agric Environ Med, 12- 1"4. 087563
Luginaah IN; Fung KY; Gorey KM; Webster G; Wills C. (2005). Association of ambient air pollution with
respiratory hospitalization in a government designated "area of concern"' the case of Windsor, Ontario.
Environ Health Perspect, 113- 290-296. 057327
Luttmann-Gibson H; Suh HH; Coull BA; Dockery DW; Sarnet SE; Schwartz J; Stone PH; Gold DR. (2006).
Short-term effects of air pollution on heart rate variability in senior adults in Steubenville, Ohio. J Occup
Environ Med, 48: 780-788. 089794
Magas OK; Gunter JT; Regens JL. (2007). Ambient air pollution and daily pediatric hospitalizations for asthma.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 14: 19-23. 090714
Maheswaran R; Haining RP; Brindley P; Law J; Pearson T; Fryers PR; Wise S; Campbell MJ. (2005). Outdoor
air pollution and stroke in Sheffield, United Kingdom: a small-area level geographical study. , 36: 239"
243. 088683
Maheswaran R; Haining RP; Brindley P; Law J; Pearson T; Fryers PR; Wise S; Campbell MJ. (2005). Outdoor
air pollution, mortality, and hospital admissions from coronary heart disease in Sheffield, UK: a small-
area level ecological study. Eur Heart J, 26: 2543-2549. 090769
Maisonet M; Bush TJ; Correa A; Jaakkola JJK. (2001). Relation between ambient air pollution and low birth
weight in the northeastern United States. Environ Health Perspect, 1093: 351-356. 016624
Mann JK; Tager IB; Lurmann F; Segal M; Quesenberry CP Jr; Lugg MM; Shan J; Van den Eeden SK. (2002).
Air pollution and hospital admissions for ischemic heart disease in persons with congestive heart failure
or arrhythmia. Environ Health Perspect, 110: 1247-1252. 036723
Mannes T; Jalaludin B; Morgan G; Lincoln D; Sheppeard V; Corbett S. (2005). Impact of ambient air pollution
on birth weight in Sydney, Australia. Occup Environ Med, 62: 524-530. 087895
Mar TF; Jansen K; Shepherd K; Lumley T; Larson TV; Koenig JQ. (2005). Exhaled nitric oxide in children with
asthma and short-term PM25 exposure in Seattle. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 1791-1794. 088759
Mar TF; Koenig JQ; Jansen K; Sullivan J; Kaufman J; Trenga CA; Siahpush SH; Liu L-JS; Neas L. (2005). Fine
particulate air pollution and cardiorespiratory effects in the elderly. , 16: 681-687. 087566
Mar TF; Larson TV; Stier RA; Claiborn C; Koenig JQ. (2004). An analysis of the association between respiratory
symptoms in subjects with asthma and daily air pollution in Spokane, Washington. Inhal Toxicol, 16:
809-815. 057309
Martins LC; Latorre MRDO; Saldiva PHN; Braga ALF. (2002). Air pollution and emergency room visits due to
chronic lower respiratory diseases in the elderly: an ecological time-series study in Sao Paulo, Brazil. J
Occup Environ Med, 44: 622-627. 035059
Martins MCH; Fatigati FL; Vespoli TC; Martins LC; Martins MA; Saldiva PHN; Braga ALF. (2004). Influence of
socioeconomic conditions on air pollution effects in elderly people an analysis of six regions in Sao Paolo,
Brazil. J Epidemiol Community Health, 58: 41-46. 087457
Masjedi MR; Jamaati HR; Dokouhaki P; Ahmadzadeh Z; Taheri SA; Bigdeli M; Izadi S; Rostamian A; Aagin K;
Ghavam SM. (2003). The effects of air pollution on acute respiratory conditions. Respirology, 8: 213-230.
052100
McConnell R; Berhane K; Gilliland F; London SJ; Islam T; Gauderman WJ; Avol E; Margolis HG; Peters JM.
(2002). Asthma in exercising children exposed to ozone: a cohort study. Lancet, 359: 386-391. 023150
McConnell R; Berhane K; Gilliland F; London SJ; Vora H; Avol E; Gauderman WJ; Margolis HG; Lurmann F;
Thomas DC; Peters JM. (1999). Air pollution and bronchitic symptoms in southern California children
with asthma. Environ Health Perspect, 107: 757-760. 007028
McConnell R; Berhane K; Gilliland F; Molitor J; Thomas D; Lurmann F; Avol E; Gauderman WJ; Peters JM.
(2003). Prospective study of air pollution and bronchitic symptoms in children with asthma. Am J Respir
Crit Care Med, 168: 790-797. 049490
McConnell R; Berhane K; Molitor J; Gilliland F; Kunzli N; thorne PS; Thomas D; Gauderman WJ; Avol E;
Lurmann F; Rappaport E; Jerrett M; Peters JM. (2006). Dog ownership enhances symptomatic responses
to air pollution inchildren with asthma. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 1910-1915. 180226
McCreanor J; Cullinan P; Nieuwenhuijsen MJ; Stewart-Evans J; Malliarou E; Jarup L; Harrington R;
Svartengren M; Han I"K; Ohman-Strickland P; Chung KF; Zhang J. (2007). Respiratory effects of
exposure to diesel traffic in persons with asthma. , 357: 2348-2358. 092841
McDonnell WF; Nishino-Ishikawa N; Petersen FF; Chen LH; Abbey DE. (2000). Relationships of mortality with
the fine and coarse fractions of long-term ambient PM10 concentrations in nonsmokers. J Expo Sci
Environ Epidemiol, 10: 427-436. 010319
McGowan JA; Hider PN; Chacko E; Town GI. (2002). Particulate air pollution and hospital admissions in
Christchurch, New Zealand. Aust N Z J Public Health, 26: 23-29. 030325
July 2009
E-691
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Medina-Ramon Mi Zanobetti Ai Schwartz J. (2006). The effect of ozone and PM10 on hospital admissions for
pneumonia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease- a national multicitv study. Am J Epidemiol, 163:
579-588. 087721
Meng YYi Wilhelm Mi Rull RP; English Pi Ritz B. (2007). Traffic and outdoor air pollution levels near
residences and poorly controlled asthma in adults. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 98- 455-63. 093275
Metzger KB; Klein M; Flanders WD; Peel JL; Mulholland JA; Langberg JJ; Tolbert PE. (2007). Ambient air
pollution and cardiac arrhythmias in patients with implantable defibrillators. Epidemiology, 18- 585-592.
092856
Metzger KB; Tolbert PE; Klein M; Peel JL; Flanders WD; Todd KH; Mulholland JA; Ryan PB; Frumkin H.
(2004). Ambient air pollution and cardiovascular emergency department visits. , 15- 46"56. 044222
Michaud J-P; Grove JS; Krupitsky D. (2004). Emergency department visits and "vog"-related air quality in Hilo,
Hawaii. Environ Res, 95: 11-19. 089900
Middleton N; Yiallouros P; KLeanthous S; Kolokotroni 0; Schwartz J; Dockery DW; Demokritou P; Koutrakis P.
(2008). A 10-year time-series analysis of respiratory and cardiovascular morbidity in Nicosia, Cyprus: the
effect of short-term changes in air pollution and dust storms. , T- 39. 156760
Migliaretti G; Cadum E; Migliore E; Cavallo F. (2005). Traffic air pollution and hospital admission for asthma: a
case-control approach in a Turin (Italy) population. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 78: 164-169. 088689
Migliaretti G; Cavallo F. (2004). Urban air pollution and asthma in children. Pediatr Pulmonol, 38: 198-203.
087425
Miller KA; Siscovick DS; Sheppard L; Shepherd K; Sullivan JH; Anderson GL; Kaufman JD. (2007). Long-term
exposure to air pollution and incidence of cardiovascular events in women. , 356: 447-458. 090130
Millstein J; Gilliland F; Berhane K; Gauderman WJ; McConnell R; Avol E; Rappaport EB; Peters JM. (2004).
Effects of ambient air pollutants on asthma medication use and wheezing among fourth-grade school
children from 12 Southern California communities enrolled in The Children's Health Study. Arch
Environ Occup Health, 59: 505-514. 088629
Min KB; Min JY; Cho SI; Paek D. (2008). The relationship between air pollutants and heart-rate variability
among community residents in Korea. Inhal Toxicol, 4- 435-444. 191901
Mohr LB; Luo S; Mathias E; Tobing R; Homan S; Sterling D. (2008). Influence of season and temperature on the
relationship of elementalcarbon air pollution to pediatric asthma emergency room visits. J Asthma, 45:
936-943. 180215
Morgenstern V; Zutavern A; Cyrys J; Brockow I; Gehring U; Koletzko S; Bauer CP; Reinhardt D; Wichmann H"
E; Heinrich J. (2007). Respiratory health and individual estimated exposure to traffic-related air
pollutants in a cohort of young children. Occup Environ Med, 64: 8"16. 090747
Mortimer K; Neugebauer R; Lurmann F; Alcorn S; Balmes J; Tager I. (2008). Early-Lifetime exposure to air
pollution and allergic sensitizationin children with asthma. J Asthma, 45: 874-881. 187280
Mortimer KM; Neas LM; Dockery DW; Redline S; Tager IB. (2002). The effect of air pollution on inner-city
children with asthma. Eur Respir J, 19: 699-705. 030281
Moshammer H; Hutter H"P; Hauck H; Neuberger M. (2006). Low levels of air pollution induce changes of lung
function in a panel of schoolchildren. Eur Respir J, 27: 1138-1143. 090771
Moshammer H; Neuberger M. (2003). The active surface of suspended particles as a predictor of lung function
and pulmonary symptoms in Austrian school children. Atmos Environ, 37: 1737-1744. 041956
Murata A; Kida K; Hasunuma H; Kanegae H; Ishimaru Y; Motegi T; Yamada K; Yoshioka H; Yamamoto K;
Kudoh S. (2007). Environmental influence on the measurement of exhaled nitric oxide concentration in
school children: special reference to methodology. , 74: 30-36. 156787
Naess O; Nafstad P; Aamodt G; Claussen B; Rosland P. (2007). Relation between concentration of air pollution
and cause-specific mortality: four-year exposures to nitrogen dioxide and particulate matter pollutants in
470 neighborhoods in Oslo, Norway. Am J Epidemiol, 165: 435-443. 090736
Nafstad P; Haheim LL; Wisloff T; Gram F; Oftedal B; Holme I; Hjermann I; Leren P. (2004). Urban air pollution
and mortality in a cohort of Norwegian men. Environ Health Perspect, 112: 610-605. 087949
Nascimento LF; Pereira LA; Braga AL; Modolo MC; Carvalho JA Jr. (2006). Effects of air pollution on children's
health in a city in southeastern Brazil. Rev Saude Publica, 40: 77-82. 093247
Nawrot TS; Torfs R; Fierens F; De Henauw S; Hoet PH; Van Kersschaever G; De Backer G; Nemery B. (2007).
Stronger associations between daily mortality and fine particulate air pollution in summer than in
winter: evidence from a heavily polluted region in western Europe. J Epidemiol Community Health, 61:
146-9. 098619
Nerriere E; Zmirou-Navier D; Desqueyroux P; Leclerc N; Momas I; Czernichow P. (2005). Lung cancer risk
assessment in relation with personal exposure to airborne particles in four French metropolitan areas. J
Occup Environ Med, 47: 1211-1217. 088630
July 2009
E-692
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Neuberger M> Schimek MG; Horak F Jr', Moshammer H; Kundi Mi Frischer Ti Gomiscek Bi Puxbaum Hi Hauck
Hi AUPHEP-Team. (2004). Acute effects of particulate matter on respiratory diseases, symptoms and
functions' epidemiological results of the Austrian Projects on Health Effects of Particulate Matter
(AUPHEP). Atmos Environ, 38: 3971-3981. 093249
O'Connor GTi Neas Li Vaughn Bi Kattan Mi Mitchell Hi Crain EFi Evans R, 3rd; Gruchalla R; Morgan W', Stout
J; Adams GK; Lippmann M. (2008). Acute respiratory health effects of air pollution on children with
asthma in US inner cities. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 121: 1133-1139 e!131. 156818
O'Neill MS; Bell ML; Ranjit N; Cifuentes LA; Loomis D; gouveia N; Borja-Aburto VH. (2008). Air pollution and
mortality in Latin America: The role of education. Epidemiology, 19: 810-819. 192314
O'Neill MS; Diez-Roux AV; Auchincloss AH; Franklin TG; Jacobs Jnr DR; Astor BC; Dvonch JT; Kaufman J.
(2007). Airborne particulate matter exposure and urinary albumin excretion: The Multi-Ethnic Study of
Atherosclerosis. Occup Environ Med, 65: 534-540. 156006
O'Neill MS; Hajat S; Zanobetti A; Ramirez-Aguilar M; Schwartz J. (2005). Impact of control for air pollution and
respiratory epidemics on the estimated associations of temperature and daily mortality. Int J
Biometeorol, 50: 121-9. 098094
O'Neill MS; Loomis D; Borja Aburto VH; Gold D; Hertz-Picciotto I; Castillejos M. (2004). Do associations
between airborne particles and daily mortality in Mexico City differ by measurement method, region, or
modeling strategy?. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 14: 429-439. 087429
O'Neill MS; Veves A; Sarnat JA; Zanobetti A; Gold DR; Economides PA; Horton ES; Schwartz J. (2007). Air
pollution and inflammation in type 2 diabetes: a mechanism for susceptibility. Occup Environ Med, 64:
373-379. 091362
O'Neill MS; Veves A; Zanobetti A; Sarnat JA; Gold DR; Economides PA; Horton ES; Schwartz J. (2005).
Diabetes enhances vulnerability to particulate air pollution-associated impairment in vascular reactivity
and endothelial function. , 111: 2913-2920. 088423
Odajima H; Yamazaki S; Nitta H. (2008). Decline in peak expiratory flow according to hourly short-term
concentration of particulate matter in asthmatic children. Inhal Toxicol, 20: 1263. 192005
Oftedal B; Brunekreef B; Nystad W', Madsen C; Walker S"E; Nafstad P. (2008). Residential outdoor air pollution
and lung function in schoolchildren. Epidemiology, 19: 129-137. 093202
Oftedal B; Nafstad P; Magnus P; Bjorkly S; Skrondal A. (2003). Traffic related air pollution and acute hospital
admission for respiratory diseases in Drammen, Norway 1995-2000. Eur J Epidemiol, 18: 671-675.
055623
Ostro B; Broadwin R; Green S; Feng W"Y; Lipsett M. (2006). Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in nine
California counties: results from CALFINE. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 29"33. 087991
Ostro B; Feng W"Y; Broadwin R; Green S; Lipsett M. (2007). The effects of components of fine particulate air
pollution on mortality in California: results from CALFINE. Environ Health Perspect, 115: 13-9. 091354
Ostro BD; Feng WY; Broadwin R; Malig BJ; Green RS; Lipsett MJ. (2008). The impact of components of fine
particulate matter on cardiovascular mortality in susceptible subpopulations. Occup Environ Med, 65:
750-756. 097971
Ozkaynak H; Thurston GD. (1987). Associations between 1980 US mortality rates and alternative measures of
airborne particle concentration. Risk Anal, T- 449-461. 072960
Park SK; O'Neill MS; Vokonas PS; Sparrow D; Schwartz J. (2005). Effects of air pollution on heart rate
variability: the VA normative aging study. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 304-309. 057331
Park SK; O'Neill MS; Vokonas PS; Sparrow D; Spiro A, 3rd; Tucker KL; Suh H; Hu H; Schwartz J. (2008).
Traffic-related particles are associated with elevated homocysteine: the VA normative aging study. Am J
Respir Crit Care Med, 178: 283-289. 156845
Park SK; O'Neill MS; Wright RO; Hu H; Vokonas PS; Sparrow D; Suh H; Schwartz J. (2006). HFE genotype,
particulate air pollution, and heart rate variability A gene-environmental interaction. , 114: 2798-2805.
091245
Parker JD; Akinbami LJ; Woodruff TJ. (2009). Air Pollution and Childhood Respiratory Allergies in the United
States. Environ Health Perspect, 117: 140-147. 192359
Parker JD; Woodruff TJ. (2008). Influences of study design and location on the relationship between particulate
matter air pollution and birthweight. , 22: 214-27. 189095
Parker JD; Woodruff TJ; Basu R; Schoendorf KC. (2005). Air pollution and birth weight among term infants in
California. , 115: 121-128. 087462
Peacock JL; Symonds P; Jackson P; Bremner SA; Scarlett JF; Strachan DP; Anderson HR. (2003). Acute effects
of winter air pollution on respiratory function in schoolchildren in southern England. Occup Environ
Med, 60: 82-89. 042026
July 2009
E-693
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Peel JL; Metzger KB; Klein M; Flanders WD; Mulholland JA; Tolbert PE. (2007). Ambient air pollution and
cardiovascular emergency department visits in potentially sensitive groups. Am J Epidemiol, 165- 625"
633. 090442
Peel JL; Tolbert PE; Klein M; Metzger KB; Flanders WD; Knox T; Mulholland JA; Ryan PB; Frumkin H. (2005).
Ambient air pollution and respiratory emergency department visits. , 16- 164-174. 056305
Pekkanen J; Peters A; Hoek G; Tiittanen P; Brunekreef B; de Hartog J; Heinrich J; Ibald-Mulli A; Kreyling WG;
Lanki T; Timonen KL; Vanninen E. (2002). Particulate air pollution and risk of ST-segment depression
during repeated submaximal exercise tests among subjects with coronary heart disease- the exposure and
risk assessment for fine and ultrafine particles in ambient air (ULTRA) study. , 106- 933-938. 035050
Peled R; Friger M; Bolotin A; Bibi H; Epstein L; Pilpel D; Scharf S. (2005). Fine particles and meteorological
conditions are associated with lung function in children with asthma living near two power plants. Public
Health, 119: 418-425. 156015
Penard-Morand C; Charpin D; Raherison C; Kopferschmitt C; Caillaud D; Lavaud F; Annesi-Maesano I. (2005).
Long-term exposure to background air pollution related to respiratory and allergic health in
schoolchildren. Clin Exp Allergy, 35: 1279-1287. 087951
Peng RD; Chang HH; Bell ML; McDermott A; Zeger SL; Samet JM; Dominici F. (2008). Coarse particulate
matter air pollution and hospital admissions for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases among Medicare
patients. JAMA, 299: 2172-2179. 156850
Peng RD; Dominici F; Pastor-Barriuso R; Zeger SL; Samet JM. (2005). Seasonal analyses of air pollution and
mortality in 100 US cities. Am J Epidemiol, 161: 585-594. 087463
Penttinen P; Tiittanen P; Pekkanen J. (2004). Mortality and air pollution in metropolitan Helsinki, 1988-1996.
Scand J Work Environ Health, 2: 19-27. 087432
Penttinen P; Vallius M; Tiittanen P; Ruuskanen J; Pekkanen J. (2006). Source-specific fine particles in urban
air and respiratory function among adult asthmatics. Inhal Toxicol, 18: 191-198. 087988
Pereira LAA; Loomis D; Conceicao GMS; Braga ALF; Areas RM; Kishi HS; Singer JM; Bohm GM; Saldiva PHN.
(1998). Association between air pollution and intrauterine mortality in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Environ Health
Perspect, 106: 325-329. 007264
Perez L; Tobias A; Querol X; Kunzli N> Pey J; Alastuey A; Viana M; Valero N; Gonzalez-Cabre M; Sunyer J.
(2008). Coarse particles from Saharan dust and daily mortality. Epidemiology, 19: 800-807. 156020
Peters A; Greven S; Heid I; Baldari F; Breitner S; Bellander T; Chrysohoou C; Illig T; Jacquemin B; Koenig W.
(2009). Fibrinogen Genes Modify the Fibrinogen Response to Ambient Particulate Matter. Am J Respir
Crit Care Med, 179: 484-491. 191992
Peters A; MONICA/KORA-Studiengruppe. (2005). Partikel in der Aussenluft erhoren das Risiko fur Herz-
Kreislauf-Erkrankungen [Aerosol particles increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases].
Gesundheitswesen, l: S79-S85. 095747
Peters A; von Klot S; Heier M; Trentinaglia I; Cyrys J; Hormann A; Hauptmann M; Wichmann HE; Lowel H.
(2005). Particulate air pollution and nonfatal cardiac events. Part I. Air pollution, personal activities, and
onset of myocardial infarction in a case-crossover study. 156859
Peters JM; Avol E; Gauderman WJ; Linn WS; Navidi W', London SJ; Margolis H; Rappaport E; Vora H; Gong H
Jr; Thomas DC. (1999). A study of twelve southern California communities with differing levels and
types of air pollution II Effects on pulmonary function. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 159: 768-775. 087237
Pierse N> Rushton L; Harris RS; Kuehni CE; Silverman M; Grigg J. (2006). Locally-generated particulate
pollution and respiratory symptoms in young children. Thorax, 61: 216-220. 088757
Pino P; Walter T; Oyarzun M; Villegas R; Romieu I. (2004). Fine particulate matter and wheezing illnesses in
the first year of life. , 15: 702-708. 050220
Pitard A; Zeghnoun A; Courseaux A; Lamberty J; Delmas V; Fossard JL; Villet H. (2004). Short-term
associations between air pollution and respiratory drug sales. Environ Res, 95: 43"52. 087433
Pope C; Renlund D; Kfoury A; May H; Home B. (2008). Relation of heart failure hospitalization to exposure to
fine particulate air pollution. , 102: 1230-1234. 191969
Pope CA 3rd; Ezzati M; Dockery DW. (2009). Fine-particulate air pollution and life expectancy in the United
States. N Engl J Med, 360: 376-386. 190107
Pope CA III; Burnett RT. (2007). Confounding in air pollution epidemiology: the broader context. , 18: 424-426.
090928
Pope CA III; Burnett RT; Thun MJ; Calle EE; Krewski D; Ito K; Thurston GD. (2002). Lung cancer,
cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. JAMA, 287: 1132"
1141. 024689
Pope CA III; Burnett RT; Thurston GD; Thun MJ; Calle EE; Krewski D; Godleski JJ. (2004). Cardiovascular
mortality and long-term exposure to particulate air pollution: epidemiological evidence of general
pathophysiological pathways of disease. , 109: 71-77. 055880
July 2009
E-694
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Pope CA IIL Rodermund DL; Gee MM. (2007). Mortality effects of a copper smelter strike and reduced ambient
sulfate particulate matter air pollution. Environ Health Perspect, 115- 679-683. 091256
Pope CA; Hansen ML; Long RW; Nielsen KR; Eatough NL; Wilson WE; Eatough DJ. (2004). Ambient
particulate air pollution, heart rate variability, and blood markers of inflammation in a panel of elderly
subjects. Environ Health Perspect, 112- 339-345. 055238
Pope CA IIL Muhlestein JB; May HT; Renlund DG; Anderson JL; Home BD. (2006). Ischemic heart disease
events triggered by short-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. Circulation, 114- 2443-2448.
091246
Preutthipan A; Udomsubpayakul U; Chaisupamongkollarp T; Pentamwa P. (2004). Effect of PM10 pollution in
Bangkok on children with and without asthma. Pediatr Pulmonol, 37- 187-192. 055598
Puett RC; Schwartz J; Hart JE; Yanosky JD; Speizer FE; Suh H; Paciorek CJ; Neas LM; Laden F. (2008).
Chronic particulate exposure, mortality, and coronary heart disease in the nurses' health study. Am J
Epidemiol, 168: 1161-1168. 156891
Qian Z; He Q; Lin H"M; Kong L; Liao D; Dan J; Bentley CM; Wang B. (2007). Association of daily cause-specific
mortality with ambient particle air pollution in Wuhan, China. Environ Res, 105: 380-389. 093054
Qian Z; He Q; Lin HM; Kong L; Bentley CM; Liu W; Zhou D. (2008). High temperatures enhanced acute
mortality effects of ambient particle pollution in the "oven" city of Wuhan, China. Environ Health
Perspect, 116: 1172-1178. 156894
Qian Z; Liao D; Lin H"M; Whitsel EA; Rose KM; Duan Y. (2005). Lung function and long-term exposure to air
pollutants in middle-aged American adults. Arch Environ Occup Health, 60: 156-163. 093283
Rabinovitch N; Strand M; Gelfand EW. (2006). Particulate levels are associated with early asthma worsening in
children with persistent disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 173: 1098-1105. 088031
Rabinovitch N; Zhang LN; Murphy JR; Vedal S; Dutton SJ; Gelfand EW. (2004). Effects of wintertime ambient
air pollutants on asthma exacerbations in urban minority children with moderate to severe disease. J
Allergy Clin Immunol, 114: 1131-1137. 096753
Rainham DG; Smoyer-Tomic KE; Sheridan SC; Burnett RT. (2005). Synoptic weather patterns and modification
of the association between air pollution and human mortality. Int J Environ Health Res, 15: 347-360.
088676
Ranzi A; Gambini M; Spattini A; Galassi C; Sesti D; Bedeschi M; Messori A; Baroni A; Cavagni G; Lauriola P.
(2004). Air pollution and respiratory status in asthmatic children: hints for a locally based preventive
strategy AIRE study. Eur J Epidemiol, 19: 567-576. 089500
Ren C; Tong S. (2006). Temperature modifies the health effects of particulate matter in Brisbane, Australia. Int
J Biometeorol, 51: 87-96. 092824
Rich DQ; Demissie K; Lu SE; Kamat L; Wartenberg D; Rhoads GG. (2009). Ambient air pollutant
concentrations during pregnancy and the risk of fetal growth restriction. J Epidemiol Community
Health, In Press: 1-9. 180122
Rich DQ; Freudenberger RS; Ohman-Strickland P; Cho Y; Kipen HM. (2008). Right heart pressure increases
after acute increases in ambient particulate concentration. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 1167-1171.
156910
Rich DQ; Kim MH; Turner JR; Mittleman MA; Schwartz J; Catalano PJ; Dockery DW. (2006). Association of
ventricular arrhythmias detected by implantable cardioverter defibrillator and ambient air pollutants in
the St Louis, Missouri metropolitan area. Occup Environ Med, 63: 591-596. 089814
Rich DQ; Mittleman MA; Link MS; Schwartz J; Luttmann-Gibson H; Catalano PJ; Speizer FE; Gold DR;
Dockery DW. (2006). Increased risk of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation episodes associated with acute
increases in ambient air pollution. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 120-123. 088427
Rich DQ; Schwartz J; Mittleman MA; Link M; Luttmann-Gibson H; Catalano PJ; Speizer FE; Dockery DW.
(2005). Association of short-term ambient air pollution concentrations and ventricular arrhythmias. Am J
Epidemiol, 161: 1123-1132. 079620
Rich KE; Petkau J; Vedal S; Brauer M. (2004). A case-crossover analysis of particulate air pollution and cardiac
arrhythmia in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 363-372. 055631
Riediker M; Devlin RB; Griggs TR; Herbst MC; Bromberg PA; Williams RW; Cascio WE. (2004). Cardiovascular
effects in patrol officers are associated with fine particulate matter from brake wear and engine
emissions. Part Fibre Toxicol, l: 2. 091261
Riojas-Rodriguez H; Escamilla-Cejudo JA; Gonzalez-Hermosillo JA; Tellez-Rojo MM; Vallejo M; Santos-Burgoa
C; Rojas-Bracho L. (2006). Personal PM2.5 and CO exposures and heart rate variability in subjects with
known ischemic heart disease in Mexico City. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 16: 131-137. 156913
Rios JLM; Boechat JL; Sant'Anna CC; Franca AT. (2004). Atmospheric pollution and the prevalence of asthma:
study among schoolchildren of 2 areas in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 92: 629"
634. 087800
July 2009
E-695
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Ritz Bi Wilhelm Mi Hoggatt KJi Ghosh JK. (2007). Ambient air pollution and preterm birth in the environment
and pregnancy outcomes study at the University of California, Los Angeles. Am J Epidemiol, 166- 1045"
52.096146
Ritz Bi Wilhelm Mi Zhao Y. (2006). Air pollution and infant death in southern California, 1989-2000. , 118: 493-
502. 089819
Ritz Bi Yu Fi Chapa Gi Fruin S. (2000). Effect of air pollution on preterm birth among children born in Southern
California between 1989 and 1993. , 11: 502-511. 012068
Ritz B> Yu Fi Fruin Si Chapa Gi Shaw GMi Harris JA. (2002). Ambient air pollution and risk of birth defects in
Southern California. Am J Epidemiol, 155: 17-25. 023227
Roberts S. (2004). Interactions between particulate air pollution and temperature in air pollution mortality time
series studies. Environ Res, 96: 328-337. 087924
Roberts S. (2005). Using moving total mortality counts to obtain improved estimates for the effect of air
pollution on mortality. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 1148-1152. 087992
Roberts S. (2006). A new model for investigating the mortality effects of multiple air pollutants in air pollution
mortality time-series studies. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 69: 417-435. 089762
Roberts Si Martin MA. (2006). Applying a moving total mortality count to the cities in the NMMAPS database
to estimate the mortality effects of particulate matter air pollution. Occup Environ Med, 63: 193-197.
088670
Roberts Si Martin MA. (2006). The question of nonlinearity in the dose-response relation between particulate
matter air pollution and mortality: can Akaike's Information Criterion be trusted to take the right turn?.
Am J Epidemiol, 164: 1242-50. 097799
Roberts Si Martin MA. (2007). A distributed lag approach to fitting non-linear dose-response models in
particulate matter air pollution time series investigations. Environ Res, 104: 193-200. 156916
Roberts Si Martin MA. (2007). Methods for bias reduction in time-series studies of particulate matter air
pollution and mortality. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 70: 665-675. 156917
Rodriguez Ci Tonkin Ri Heyworth Ji Kusel Mi De Klerk Ni Sly PDi Franklin Pi Runnion Ti Blockley Ai Landau
Li Hinwood AL. (2007). The relationship between outdoor air quality and respiratory symptoms in young
children. Int J Environ Health Res. 092842
Rogers JFi Dunlop AL. (2006). Air pollution and very low birth weight infants: a target population?. , 118: 156-
164. 091232
Rojas-Martinez Ri Perez-Padilla Ri Olaiz-Fernandez Gi Mendoza-Alvarado Li Moreno-Macias Hi Fortoul Ti
McDonnell Wi Loomis Di Romieu I. (2007). Lung function growth in children with long-term exposure to
air pollutants in Mexico City. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 176: 377-384. 091064
Roman HAi Walker KDi Walsh TLi Conner Li Richmond HMi Hubbell BJi Kinney PL. (2008). Expert judgment
assessment of the mortality impact of changes in ambient fine particulate matter in the U.S. Environ Sci
Technol, 42: 2268-2274. 156921
Romieu Ii Garcia-Esteban Ri Sunyer Ji Rios Ci Alcaraz-Zubeldia Mi Velasco SRi Holguin F. (2008). The effect of
supplementation with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on markers of oxidative stress in elderly
exposed to PM(2.5). Environ Health Perspect, 116: 1237-1242. 156922
Romieu Ii Ramirez-Aguilar Mi Moreno-Macias Hi Barraza-Villarreal Ai Miller Pi Hernandez-Cadena Li
Carbajal"Arroyo LAi Hernandez-Avila M. (2004). Infant mortality and air pollution: modifying effect by
social class. J Occup Environ Hyg, 46: 1210-1216. 093074
Romieu Ii Tellez-Rojo MMi Lazo Mi Manzano-Patino Cortez-Lugo Mi Julien Pi Belanger MCi Hernandez-Avila
MHolguin F. (2005). Omega-3 fatty acid prevents heart rate variability reductions associated with
particulate matter. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 172: 1534-1540. 086297
Rosenlund Mi Bellander Ti Nordquist Ti Alfredsson L. (2007). Long-Term Exposure to Air Pollution and Cancer.
, 18(5): S66. 114679
Rosenlund Mi Bellander Ti Nordqvist Ti Alfredsson L. (2006). A register-based case-control study of air
pollution and myocardial infarction. Epidemiology, 17: S240. 114678
Rosenthal FSi Carney JPi Olinger ML. (2008). Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and airborne fine particulate
matter: a case-crossover analysis of emergency medical services data in Indianapolis, Indiana. Environ
Health Perspect, 116: 631-636. 156925
Ruckerl Ri Greven Si Ljungman Pi Aalto Pi Antoniades Ci Bellander Ti Berglind Ni Chrysohoou Ci Forastiere Fi
Jacquemin Bi von Klot Si Koenig Wi Kuchenhoff Hi Lanki Ti Pekkanen Ji Perucci CAi Schneider Ai
Sunyer Ji Peters A. (2007). Air pollution and inflammation (interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, fibrinogen)
in myocardial infarction survivors. Environ Health Perspect, 115: 1072-1080. 156931
Ruckerl Ri Ibald-Mulli Ai Koenig WSchneider Ai Woelke Gi Cyrys Ji Heinrich Ji Marder Vi Frampton Mi
Wichmann HEi Peters A. (2006). Air pollution and markers of inflammation and coagulation in patients
with coronary heart disease. Environ Health Perspect, 173: 432-441. 088754
July 2009
E-696
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Ruckerl R; Phipps RP; Schneider A; Frampton M; Cyrys J; Oberdorster G; Wichmann HE; Peters A. (2007).
Ultrafine particles and platelet activation in patients with coronary heart disease -- results from a
prospective panel study. Part Fibre Toxicol, 4- 1. 091379
Sagiv SE Mendola P; Loomis D; Herring AH; Neas LM; Savitz DA; Poole C. (2005). A time-series analysis of air
pollution and preterm birth in Pennsylvania, 1997-2001. Environ Health Perspect, 113- 602-606. 087468
Sakai M; Sato YJ Sato S; Ihara SJ Onizuka M; Sakakibara Y; Takahashi H. (2004). Effect of relocating to areas
of reduced atmospheric particulate matter levels on the human circulating leukocyte count. J Appl
Physiol, 97: 1774-1780. 087435
Salam MT; Millstein J; Li Y-F; Lurmann FW; Margolis HG; Gilliland FD. (2005). Birth outcomes and prenatal
exposure to ozone, carbon monoxide, and particulate matter: results from the Children's Health Study.
Environ Health Perspect, 113: 1638-1644. 087885
Samoli E; Analitis A; Touloumi G; Schwartz J; Anderson HR; Sunyer J; Bisanti L; Zmirou D; Vonk JM;
Pekkanen J; Goodman P; Paldy A; Schindler C; Katsouyanni K. (2005). Estimating the exposure-
response relationships between particulate matter and mortality within the APHEA multicity project.
Environ Health Perspect, 113: 88-95. 087436
Sanchez-Carrillo CI; Ceron-Mireles P; Rojas-Martinez MR; Mendoza-Alvarado L; Olaiz-Fernandez G; Borja-
Aburto VH. (2003). Surveillance of acute health effects of air pollution in Mexico City. , 14: 536-44.
098428
Santos U; Terra-Filho M; Lin C; Pereira L; Vieira T; Saldiva P; Braga A. (2008). Cardiac arrhythmia emergency
room visits and environmental air pollution in Sao Paulo, Brazil. J Epidemiol Community Health, 62:
267. 192004
Sarnat JA; Marmur A; Klein M; Kim E; Russell AG; Sarnat SE; Mulholland JA; Hopke PK; Tolbert PE. (2008).
Fine particle sources and cardiorespiratory morbidity: an application of chemical mass balance and factor
analytical source-apportionment methods. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 459-66. 097972
Sarnat SE; Suh HH; Coull BA; Schwartz J; Stone PH; Gold DR. (2006). Ambient particulate air pollution and
cardiac arrhythmia in a panel of older adults in Steubenville, Ohio. Occup Environ Med, 63: 700-706.
090489
Sauerzapf V; Jones AP; Cross J. (2009). Environmental factors and hospitalisation for chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease in a rural county of England. J Epidemiol Community Health, 63: 324-328. 180082
Schikowski T; Sugiri D; Ranft U; Gehring U; Heinrich J; Wichmann HE; Kramer U. (2005). Long-term air
pollution exposure and living close to busy roads are associated with COPD in women. Respir Res, 22:
152-161. 088637
Schildcrout JS; Sheppard L; Lumley T; Slaughter JC; Koenig JQ; Shapiro GG. (2006). Ambient air pollution and
asthma exacerbations in children: an eight-city analysis. Am J Epidemiol, 164: 505-517. 089812
Schindler C; Keidel D; Gerbase MWi Zemp E; Bettschart R; Brandli O; Brutsche MH; Burdet L; Karrer W;
Knopfli B; Pons M; Rapp R; Bayer-Oglesby L; Kunzli N; Schwartz J; Liu L-JS; Ackermann-Liebrich U;
Rochat T; the SAPALDIA Team. (2009). Improvements in PM10 exposure and reduced rates of
respiratory symptoms in a cohort of swiss adults (SAPALDIA). , 179: 579-587. 191950
Schneider A; Neas L; Herbst M; Case M; Williams R; Cascio W', Hinderliter A; Holguin F; Buse J; Dungan K.
(2008). Endothelial dysfunction: associations with exposure to ambient fine particles in diabetic
individuals. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 1666. 191985
Schreuder AB; Larson TV; Sheppard L; Claiborn CS. (2006). Ambient woodsmoke and associated respiratory
emergency department visits in Spokane, Washington. Int J Occup Environ Health, 12: 147-53. 097959
Schwartz J. (2004). Is the association of airborne particles with daily deaths confounded by gaseous air
pollutants? An approach to control by matching. Environ Health Perspect, 112: 557-561. 053506
Schwartz J. (2004). The effects of particulate air pollution on daily deaths: a multi-city case crossover analysis.
Occup Environ Med, 61: 956-961. 078998
Schwartz J; Coull B; Laden F; Ryan L. (2008). The effect of dose and timing of dose on the association between
airborne particles and survival. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 64"69. 156963
Schwartz J; Laden F; Zanobetti A. (2002). The concentration-response relation between PM2.5 and daily deaths.
Environ Health Perspect, 110: 1025-1029. 025312
Schwartz J; Litonjua A; Suh H; Verrier M; Zanobetti A; Syring M; Nearing B; Verrier R; Stone P; MacCallum G;
Speizer FE; Gold DR. (2005). Traffic related pollution and heart rate variability in a panel of elderly
subjects. Thorax, 60: 455-461. 074317
Sekine K; Shima M; Nitta Y; Adachi M. (2004). Long term effects of exposure to automobile exhaust on the
pulmonary function of female adults in Tokyo, Japan. Occup Environ Med, 61: 350-357. 090762
Sharma M; Kumar VN; Katiyar SE Sharma R; Shukla BP; Sengupta B. (2004). Effects of particulate air
pollution on the respiratory health of subjects who live in three areas in Kanpur, India. , 59: 348-358.
156974
July 2009
E-697
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Sharovsky R; Cesar LA; Ramires JA. (2004). Temperature, air pollution, and mortality from myocardial
infarction in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Braz J Med Biol Res, 37- 1651-1657. 156976
Silkoff PE; Zhang L; Dutton Si Langmack ELi Vedal Si Murphy Ji Make B. (2005). Winter air pollution and
disease parameters in advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease panels residing in Denver,
Colorado. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 115: 337-344. 087471
Simpson Ri Williams Gi Petroeschevsky Ai Best Ti Morgan Gi Denison Li Hinwood Ai Neville G. (2005). The
short-term effects of air pollution on hospital admissions in four Australian cities. Aust N Z J Public
Health, 29: 213-221. 087438
Sinclair AHi Tolsma D. (2004). Associations and lags between air pollution and acute respiratory visits in an
ambulatory care setting: 25-month results from the aerosol research and inhalation epidemiological
study. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 54: 1212-1218. 088696
Singh Vi Khandelwal Ri Gupta AB. (2003). Effect of air pollution on peak expiratory flow rate variability. J
Asthma, 40: 81-86. 052686
Sivacoumar Ri Jayabalou Ri Swarnalatha Si Balakrishnan K. (2006). Particulate Matter from Stone Crushing
Industry: Size Distribution and Health Effects. , 132: 405-414. 111115
Slama Ri Morgenstern Vi Cyrys Ji Zutavern Ai Herbarth Oi Wichmann HE; Heinrich J; LISA Study Group.
(2007). Traffic-related atmospheric pollutants levels during pregnancy and offspring's term birth weight:
a study relying on a land-use regression exposure model. Environ Health Perspect, 115: 1283-1292.
093216
Slaughter JC; Kim E; Sheppard L; Sullivan JH; Larson TV; Claiborn C. (2005). Association between particulate
matter and emergency room visits, hospital admissions and mortality in Spokane, Washington. J Expo
Sci Environ Epidemiol, 15: 153-159. 073854
Slaughter JC; Lumley T; Sheppard L; Koenig JQ; Shapiro GG. (2003). Effects of ambient air pollution on
symptom severity and medication use in children with asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 91: 346"
353. 086294
Sokol RZ; Kraft P; Fowler IM; Mamet R; Kim E; Berhane KT. (2006). Exposure to environmental ozone alters
semen quality. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 360-5. 098539
Solomon C; Poole J; Jarup L; Palmer K; Coggon D. (2003). Cardio-respiratory morbidity and long-term exposure
to particulate air pollution. Int J Environ Health Res, 13: 327-335. 087441
Solomon P; Baumann K; Edgerton E; Tanner R; Eatough D; Modey W', Marin H; Savoie D; Natarajan S; Meyer
MB. (2003). Comparison of integrated samplers for mass and composition during the 1999 Atlanta
supersites project. J Geophys Res, 108: 8423. 156994
Sorensen M; Daneshvar B; Hansen M; Dragsted LO; Hertel O; Knudsen L; Loft S. (2003). Personal PM25
exposure and markers of oxidative stress in blood. Environ Health Perspect, 111: 161-165. 042700
Sorensen M; Loft S; Andersen HV; Raaschou-Nielsen O; Skovgaard LT; Knudsen LE; Nielsen IV; Hertel O.
(2005). Personal exposure to PM25, black smoke and N02 in Copenhagen: relationship to bedroom and
outdoor concentrations covering seasonal variation. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 15: 413-422. 089428
Sram R; Beskid 0; Binkova B; Chvatalova I; Lnenickova Z; Milcova A; Solansky I; Tulupova E; Bavorova H;
Ocadlikova D. (2007). Chromosomal aberrations in environmentally exposed population in relation to
metabolic and DNA repair genes polymorphisms. , 620: 22"33. 188457
Stafoggia M; Schwartz J; Forastiere F; Perucci CA. (2008). Does temperature modify the association between air
pollution and mortality? A multicity case-crossover analysis in Italy. Am J Epidemiol, 167: 1476-1485.
157005
Staniswalis JG; Parks NJ; Bader JO; Maldonado YM. (2005). Temporal analysis of airborne particulate matter
reveals a dose-rate effect on mortality in El Paso: indications of differential toxicity for different particle
mixtures. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 55: 893-902. 087473
Steinvil A; Kordova-Biezuner L; Shapira I; Berliner S; Rogowski O. (2008). Short-term exposure to air pollution
and inflammation-sensitive biomarkers. , 106: 51-61. 188893
Stieb DM; Judek S; Burnett RT. (2002). Meta-analysis of time-series studies of air pollution and mortality:
effects of gases and particles and the influence of cause of death, age, and season. J Air Waste Manag
Assoc, 52: 470-484. 025205
Strand M; Vedal S; Rodes C', Dutton SJ; Gelfand EW; Rabinovitch N. (2006). Estimating effects of ambient
PM25 exposure on health using PM25 component measurements and regression calibration. J Expo Sci
Environ Epidemiol, 16: 30-38. 089203
Stolzel M; Breitner S; Cyrys J; Pitz M; Wolke G; Kreyling W; Heinrich J; Wichmann H"E; Peters A. (2007).
Daily mortality and particulate matter in different size classes in Erfurt, Germany. J Expo Sci Environ
Epidemiol, 17: 458-467. 091374
Su TC; Chan CC; Liau CS; Lin LY; Kao HL; Chuang KJ. (2006). Urban air pollution increases plasma fibrinogen
and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 levels in susceptible patients. , 13: 849-852. 157022
July 2009
E-698
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Suglia SF; Gryparis A; Wright RO; Schwartz J; Wright RJ. (2008). Association of black carbon with cognition
among children in a prospective birth cohort study. Am J Epidemiol, 167- 280-286. 157027
Suh YJ; Kim BM; Park BH; Park H; Kim YJ; Kim H; Hong YC; Ha EH. (2007). Cytochrome P450IA1
polymorphisms along with PM(10) exposure contribute to the risk of birth weight reduction. Reprod
Toxicol, 24: 281-288. 157028
Sullivan J; Ishikawa N> Sheppard L; Siscovick D; Checkoway H; Kaufman J. (2003). Exposure to ambient fine
particulate matter and primary cardiac arrest among persons with and without clinically recognized
heart disease. Am J Epidemiol, 157: 501-509. 043156
Sullivan JH; Hubbard R; Liu SL; Shepherd Ki Trenga CA Koenig JQ; Chandler WL; Kaufman JD. (2007). A
community study of the effect of particulate matter on blood measures of inflammation and thrombosis in
an elderly population. Environ Health Perspect, 6: 3. 100083
Sullivan JH; Schreuder AB; Trenga CA; Liu SL; Larson TV; Koenig JQ; Kaufman JD. (2005). Association
between short term exposure to fine particulate matter and heart rate variability in older subjects with
and without heart disease. Thorax, 60: 462"6. 109418
Sun H-L; Chou M-C; Lue K-H. (2006). The relationship of air pollution to ED visits for asthma differ between
children and adults. Am J Emerg Med, 24: 709-713. 090768
Sunyer J; Basagana X; Belmonte J; Anto JM. (2002). Effect of nitrogen dioxide and ozone on the risk of dying in
patients with severe asthma. Thorax, 57: 687-693. 034835
Sunyer J; Jarvis D; Gotschi T; Garcia-Esteban R; Jacquemin B; Aguilera I; Ackerman U; De Marco R; Forsberg
B; Gislason T; Heinrich J; Norback D; Villani S; Kunzli N. (2006). Chronic bronchitis and urban air
pollution in an international study. Occup Environ Med, 63: 836-843. 089771
Symons JM; Wang L; Guallar E; Howell E; Dominici F; Schwab M; Ange BA; Samet J; Ondov J; Harrison D;
Geyh A. (2006). A case-crossover study of fine particulate matter air pollution and onset of congestive
heart failure symptom exacerbation leading to hospitalization. Am J Epidemiol, 164: 421-33. 091258
Szyszkowicz M. (2007). Air pollution and emergency department visits for depression in Edmonton, Canada. Int
J Occup Med Environ Health, 20: 241-245. 092829
Tager IB; Balmes J; Lurmann F; Ngo L; Alcorn S; Kunzli N. (2005). Chronic exposure to ambient ozone and
lung function in young adults. , 16: 751-759. 087538
Tainio M; Tuomisto JT; Hanninen O; Aarnio P; Koistinen KJ; Jantunen MJ; Pakkanen J. (2005). Health effects
caused by primary fine particulate matter (PM2.5) emitted from buses in the Helsinki metropolitan area,
Finland. Risk Anal, 25: 151-160. 087444
Tamura K; Jinsart W', Yano E; Karita K; Boudoung D. (2003). Particulate air pollution and chronic respiratory
symptoms among traffic policemen in Bangkok. Arch Environ Occup Health, 58: 201-207. 087445
Tang C-S; Chang L"T; Lee H-C; Chan C-C. (2007). Effects of personal particulate matter on peak expiratory flow
rate of asthmatic children. Sci Total Environ, 382: 43-51. 091269
Tarantini L; Bonzini M; Apostoli P; Pegoraro V; Bollati V; Marinelli B; Cantone L; Rizzo G; Hou L; Schwartz J;
Bertazzi PA; Baccarelli A. (2009). Effects of particulate matter on genomic DNA methylation content and
iNOS promoter methylation. Environ Health Perspect, 117: 217-222. 192010
Tecer LH; Alagha O; Karaca F; Tuncel G; Eldes N. (2008). Particulate Matter (PM2.5, PM10-2.5, and PM10) and
Children's Hospital Admissions for Asthma and Respiratory Diseases: A Bidirectional Case "Crossover
Study. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 71: 512-520. 180030
Thurston G; Ito K; Mar T; Christensen WF; Eatough DJ; Henry RC; Kim E; Laden F; Lall R; Larson TV; Liu H;
Neas L; Pinto J; Stolzel M; Suh H; Hopke PK. (2005). Results and implications of the workshop on the
source apportionment of PM health effects. Epidemiology, 16: S134-S135. 097949
Timonen KL; Hoek G; Heinrich J; Bernard A; Brunekreef B; De Hartog J; Hameri K; Ibald-Mulli A; Mirme A;
Peters A; Tiittanen P; Kreyling WG! Pekkanen J. (2004). Daily variation in fine and ultrafine particulate
air pollution and urinary concentrations of lung Clara cell protein CC16. Occup Environ Med, 61: 908"
914. 087915
Timonen KL; Vanninen E; De Hartog J; Ibald-Mulli A; Brunekreef B; Gold DR; Henrich J; Hoek G; Lanki T;
Peters A; Tarkiainen T; Tiittanen P; Kreyling W', Pekkanen J. (2006). Effects of ultrafine and fine
particulate and gaseous air pollution on cardiac autonomic control in subjects with coronary artery
disease: the ULTRA study. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 16: 332-341. 088747
Tolbert PE; Kleina M; Peelb JL; Sarnata SE; Sarnata JA. (2007). Multipollutant modeling issues in a study of
ambient air quality and emergency department visits in Atlanta. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 24: 938"
945. 090316
Touloumi G; Samoli E; Quenel P; Paldy A; Anderson RH; Zmirou D; Galan I; Forsberg B; Schindler C; Schwartz
J; Katsouyanni K. (2005). Short-term effects of air pollution on total and cardiovascular mortality: the
confounding effect of influenza epidemics. , 16: 49"57. 087477
July 2009
E-699
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Tovalin H; Valverde M; Morandi MT; Blanco S; Whitehead L; Rojas E. (2006). DNA damage in outdoor workers
occupationally exposed to environmental air pollutants. Occup Environ Med, 63- 230-236. 091322
Trenga CA; Sullivan JH; Schildcrout JS; Shepherd KP; Shapiro GG; Liu LJ; Kaufman JD; Koenig JQ. (2006).
Effect of particulate air pollution on lung function in adult and pediatric subjects in a Seattle panel
study. , 129: 1614-22. 155209
Tsai CJ; Chang CT; Huang CH. (2006). Direct field observation of the relative humidity effect on the beta-gauge
readings. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 56: 834-40. 098312
Tsai S-S; Cheng M"H; Chiu H-F; Wu T-N; Yang C-Y. (2006). Air pollution and hospital admissions for asthma in
a tropical city: Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Inhal Toxicol, 18: 549-554. 089768
Tsai S-S; Goggins WB; Chiu H"F; Yang C"Y. (2003). Evidence for an association between air pollution and daily
stroke admissions in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. , 34: 2612-2616. 080133
Tsai S-S; Huang C-H; Goggins WB; Wu T"N; Yang C"Y. (2003). Relationship between air pollution and daily
mortality in a tropical city: Kaohsiung, Taiwan. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 66: 1341-1349. 050480
Ulirsch GV; Ball LM; Kaye W', Shy CM; Lee CV; Crawford-Brown D; Symons M; Holloway T. (2007). Effect of
particulate matter air pollution on hospital admissions and medical visits for lung and heart disease in
two southeast Idaho cities. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 17: 478-487. 091332
Vajanapoom N> Shy CM; Neas LM; Loomis D. (2002). Associations of particulate matter and daily mortality in
Bangkok, Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health, 33: 389-399. 042542
Vallejo M; Ruiz S; Hermosillo AG; Borja-Aburto VH; Cardenas M. (2006). Ambient fine particles modify heart
rate variability in young healthy adults. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 16: 125-130. 157081
Van Hee VC; Adar SD; Szpiro AA; Barr RG; Bluemke DA; Diez Roux AV; Gill EA; Sheppard L; Kaufman JD.
(2009). Exposure to traffic and left ventricular mass and function: the Multi-Ethnic Study of
Atherosclerosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 179: 827-834. 192110
Vedal S; Brauer M; White R; Petkau J. (2003). Air pollution and daily mortality in a city with low levels of
pollution. Environ Health Perspect, 111: 45-51. 039044
Vedal S; Rich K; Brauer M; White R; Petkau J. (2004). Air pollution and cardiac arrhythmias in patients with
implantable cardiovascular defibrillators. Inhal Toxicol, 16: 353-362. 055630
Vegni FE; Ros O. (2004). Hospital accident and emergency burden is unaffected by today's air pollution levels.
Eur J Emerg Med, 11: 86-88. 087448
Venners SA; Wang B; Xu Z; Schlatter Y; Wang L; Xu X. (2003). Particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, and daily
mortality in Chongqing, China. Environ Health Perspect, 111: 562-567. 089931
Vichit-Vadakan N; Vajanapoom N; Ostro B. (2008). The Public Health and Air Pollution in Asia (PAPA) Project:
estimating the mortality effects of particulate matter in Bangkok, Thailand. Environ Health Perspect,
116: 1179-1182. 157095
Vigotti MA; Chiaverini F; Biagiola P; Rossi G. (2007). Urban air pollution and emergency visits for respiratory
complaints in Pisa, Italy. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 70: 266-269. 090711
Villeneuve PJ; Burnett RT; Shi Y; Krewski D; Goldberg MS; Hertzman C; Chen Y; Brook J. (2003). A time-
series study of air pollution, socioeconomic status, and mortality in Vancouver, Canada. J Expo Sci
Environ Epidemiol, 13: 427-435. 055051
Villeneuve PJ; Chen L; Stieb D; Rowe BH. (2006). Associations between outdoor air pollution and emergency
department visits for stroke in Edmonton, Canada. Eur J Epidemiol, 21: 689-700. 090191
Villeneuve PJ; Goldberg MS; Krewski D; Burnett RT; Chen Y. (2002). Fine particulate air pollution and all-
cause mortality within the Harvard six-cities study: variations in risk by period of exposure. Ann
Epidemiol, 12: 568-576. 042576
Vineis P; Hoek G; Krzyzanowski M; Vigna-Taglianti F; Veglia F; Airoldi L; Autrup H; Dunning A; Garte S;
Hainaut P; Malaveille C; Matullo G; Overvad K; Raaschou-Nielsen O; Clavel-Chapelon F; Linseisen J;
Boeing H; Trichopoulou A; Palli D; Peluso M; Krogh V; Tumino R; Panico S; Bueno-De-Mesquita HB;
Peeters PH; Lund EE; Gonzalez CA; Martinez C; Dorronsoro M; Barricarte A; Cirera L; Quiros JR.;
Berglund G; Forsberg B; Day NE; Key TJ; Saracci R; Kaaks R; Riboli E. (2006). Air pollution and risk of
lung cancer in a prospective study in Europe. Int J Cancer, 119: 169-174. 192089
Von KLot S; Peters A; Aalto P; Bellander T; Berglind N; D'Ippoliti D; Elosua R; Hormann A; Kulmala M; Lanki
T; Lowel H; Pekkanen J; Picciotto S; Sunyer J; Forastiere F; Health Effects of Particles on Susceptible
Subpopulations (HEAPSS) Study Group. (2005). Ambient air pollution is associated with increased risk
of hospital cardiac readmissions of myocardial infarction survivors in five European cities. Circulation,
112: 3073-3079. 088070
Von Klot S; Wolke G; Tuch T; Heinrich J; Dockery DW; Schwartz J; Kreyling WG; Wichmann HE; Peters A.
(2002). Increased asthma medication use in association with ambient fine and ultrafine particles. Eur
Respir J, 20: 691-702. 034706
July 2009
E-700
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Ward DJ; Roberts KT; Jones N; Harrison RM; Ayres JG; Hussain S; Walters S. (2002). Effects of daily variation
in outdoor particulates and ambient acid species in normal and asthmatic children. Thorax, 57- 489-502.
025839
Wei Y; Han I"K; Shao M; Hu M; Zhang J; Tang X. (2009). PM2.5 Constituents and Oxidative DNA Damage in
Humans. Environ Sci Technol, 43- 4757—4762. 192361
Wellenius GA; Bateson TF; Mittleman MA; Schwartz J. (2005). Particulate air pollution and the rate of
hospitalization for congestive heart failure among medicare beneficiaries in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Am J Epidemiol, 161: 1030-1036. 087483
Wellenius GA; Schwartz J; Mittleman MA. (2005). Air pollution and hospital admissions for ischemic and
hemorrhagic stroke among medicare beneficiaries. , 36: 2549-2553. 088685
Wellenius GA; Schwartz J; Mittleman MA. (2006). Particulate air pollution and hospital admissions for
congestive heart failure in seven United States cities. Am J Cardiol, 97: 404-408. 088748
Wellenius GA; Yeh GY; Coull BA; Suh HH; Phillips RS; Mittleman MA. (2007). Effects of ambient air pollution
on functional status in patients with chronic congestive heart failure: a repeated-measures study. , 6: 26.
092830
Welty LJ; Peng RD; Zeger SL; Dominici F. (2008). Bayesian Distributed Lag Models: Estimating Effects of
Particulate Matter Air Pollution on Daily Mortality. Biometrics, 65: 282-291. 157134
Welty LJ; Zeger SL. (2005). Are the acute effects of particulate matter on mortality in the National Morbidity,
Mortality, and Air Pollution study the result of inadequate control for weather and season? A sensitivity
analysis using flexible distributed lag models. Am J Epidemiol, 162: 80-88. 087484
Wheeler A; Zanobetti A; Gold DR; Schwartz J; Stone P; Suh HH. (2006). The relationship between ambient air
pollution and heart rate variability differs for individuals with heart and pulmonary disease. Environ
Health Perspect, 114: 560-566. 088453
Wheeler BW; Ben-Shlomo Y. (2005). Environmental equity, air quality, socioeconomic status, and respiratory
health: a linkage analysis of routine data from the Health Survey for England. J Epidemiol Community
Health, 59: 948-954. 089860
Whitsel E; Quibrera P; Christ S; Liao D; Prineas R; Anderson G; Heiss G. (2009). Heart rate variability,
ambient particulate matter air pollution, and glucose homeostasis: the environmental epidemiology of
arrhythmogenesis in the Women's Health Initiative. Am J Epidemiol, x: x. 191980
Wilhelm M; Ritz B. (2005). Local variations in CO and particulate air pollution and adverse birth outcomes in
Los Angeles County, California, USA. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 1212-1221. 088668
Wilhelm M; Ritz B. (2005). Local variations in CO and particulate air pollution and adverse birth outcomes in
Los Angeles County, California, USA. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 1212-21. 188761
Willis A; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Krewski D. (2003). The association between sulfate air pollution and mortality
at the county scale: an exploration of the impact of scale on a long-term exposure study. J Toxicol
Environ Health A, 66: 1605-1624. 089922
Wilson WE; Mar TF; Koenig JQ. (2007). Influence of exposure error and effect modification by socioeconomic
status on the association of acute cardiovascular mortality with particulate matter in Phoenix. J Expo Sci
Environ Epidemiol, 17: Sll. 157149
Wong C-M; Atkinson RW; Anderson HR; Hedley AJ; Ma S; Chau PY-K; Lam T"H. (2002). A tale of two cities:
effects of air pollution on hospital admissions in Hong Kong and London compared. Environ Health
Perspect, 110: 67-77. 023232
Wong C-M; Ou C-Q; Thach T-Q; Chau Y-K; Chan K-P; Ho S-Y; Chung RY; Lam T-H; Hedley AJ. (2007). Does
regular exercise protect against air pollution-associated mortality?. Prev Med, 44: 386-392. 093278
Wong CM; Ou CQ; Chan KP; Chau YE Thach TQ; Yang U Chung RY; Thomas GN; Peins JS; Wong TW;
Hedley AJ; Lam TH. (2008). The effects of air pollution on mortality in socially deprived urban areas in
Hong Kong, China. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 1189-1194. 157151
Wong CM; Ou CQ; Lee NW Chan KP; Thach TQ; Chau YE Ho SY; Hedley AJ; Lam TH. (2007). Short-term
effects of particulate air pollution on male smokers and never-smokers. , 18: 593"8. 098391
Wong CM; Vichit-Vadakan N; Kan H; Qian Z. (2008). Public Health and Air Pollution in Asia (PAPA): a
multicity study of short-term effects of air pollution on mortality. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 1195-
1202. 157152
Wong TW; Tam W', Tak Sun Yu I; Wun TY; Wong AH; Wong CM. (2006). Association between air pollution and
general practitioner visits for respiratory diseases in Hong Kong. Thorax, 61: 585-591. 093266
Wong TW; Tam WS; Yu TS; Wong AHS. (2002). Associations between daily mortalities from respiratory and
cardiovascular diseases and air pollution in Hong Kong, China. Occup Environ Med, 59: 30-35. 025436
Woodruff TJ; Darrow LA; Parker JD. (2008). Air pollution and postneonatal infant mortality in the United
States, 1999-2002. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 110-5. 098386
July 2009
E-701
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Woodruff TJ; Grillo J; Schoendorf KC. (1997). The relationship between selected causes of postneonatal infant
mortality and particulate air pollution in the United States. Environ Health Perspect, 105- 608-612.
084271
Woodruff TJ; Parker JD; Schoendorf KC. (2006). Fine particulate matter (PM25) air pollution and selected
causes of postneonatal infant mortality in California. Environ Health Perspect, 114- 785-790. 088758
Xirasagar Si Lin HCi Liu TC. (2006). Seasonality in pediatric asthma admissions' the role of climate and
environmental factors. Eur J Pediatr, 165- 747-752. 093267
Yamazaki Si Nitta Hi Ono Mi Green Ji Fukuhara S. (2007). Intracerebral haemorrhage associated with hourly
concentration of ambient particulate matter- case-crossover analysis. Occup Environ Med, 64- 17-24.
090748
Yang C-Yi Chang C"Ci Chuang H"Yi Tsai S"Si Wu T"Ni Ho C"K. (2004). Relationship between air pollution and
daily mortality in a subtropical city- Taipei, Taiwan. Environ Int, 30- 519-523. 055603
Yang C-Yi Chen Y"Si Yang C"Hi Ho S"C. (2004). Relationship between ambient air pollution and hospital
admissions for cardiovascular diseases in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 67- 483-493.
094376
Yang CY. (2008). Air pollution and hospital admissions for congestive heart failure in a subtropical city- Taipei,
Taiwan. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 71- 1085-1090. 157160
Yang CYi Chen CJ. (2007). Air pollution and hospital admissions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a
subtropical city: Taipei, Taiwan. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 70: 1214-9. 092847
Yang Q; Chen Y; Krewski D; Shi Y; Burnett RT; McGrail KM. (2004). Association between particulate air
pollution and first hospital admission for childhood respiratory illness in Vancouver, Canada. Arch
Environ Occup Health, 59: 14-21. 087488
Yeatts K; Svendsen E; Creason J; Alexis N; Herbst M; Scott J; Kupper L; Williams R; Neas L; Cascio W', Devlin
RB; Peden DB. (2007). Coarse particulate matter (PM25-10) affects heart rate variability, blood lipids,
and circulating eosinophils in adults with asthma. Environ Health Perspect, 115: 709-714. 091266
Yue W; Schneider A; Stolzel M; Ruckerl R; Cyrys J; Pan X; Zareba W; Koenig W; Wichmann HE; Peters A.
(2007). Ambient source-specific particles are associated with prolonged repolarization and increased
levels of inflammation in male coronary artery disease patients. , 621: 50-60. 097968
Zanobetti A; Canner MJ; Stone PH; Schwartz J; Sher D; Eagan-Bengston E; Gates KA; Hartley LH; Suh H;
Gold DR. (2004). Ambient pollution and blood pressure in cardiac rehabilitation patients. , 110: 2184"
2189. 087489
Zanobetti A; Schwartz J. (2002). Cardiovascular damage by airborne particles: are diabetics more susceptible?. ,
13: 588-592. 034821
Zanobetti A; Schwartz J. (2003). Multicity assessment of mortality displacement within the APHEA2 project.
042812
Zanobetti A; Schwartz J. (2005). The effect of particulate air pollution on emergency admissions for myocardial
infarction: a multicity case-crossover analysis. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 978-982. 088069
Zanobetti A; Schwartz J. (2006). Air pollution and emergency admissions in Boston, MA. J Epidemiol
Community Health, 60: 890-895. 090195
Zanobetti A; Schwartz J. (2007). Particulate air pollution, progression, and survival after myocardial infarction.
Environ Health Perspect, 115: 769-775. 091247
Zanobetti A; Schwartz J. (2009). The effect of fine and coarse particulate air pollution on mortality: A national
analysis. Environ Health Perspect, 117: 1-40. 188462
Zeger S; Dominici F; McDermott A; Samet J. (2008). Mortality in the Medicare population and chronic exposure
to fine particulate air pollution in urban centers (2000-2005). Environ Health Perspect, 116: 1614.
191951
Zeger S; McDermott A; Dominici F; Samet J. (2007). Mortality in the medicare population and chronic exposure
to fine particulate air pollution. Environ Health Perspect, 116: 1614-1619. 157176
Zeka A; Sullivan JR; Vokonas PS; Sparrow D; Schwartz J. (2006). Inflammatory markers and particulate air
pollution: characterizing the pathway to disease. Int J Epidemiol, 35: 1347-1354. 157177
Zeka A; Zanobetti A; Schwartz J. (2005). Short term effects of particulate matter on cause specific mortality:
effects of lags and modification by city characteristics. Occup Environ Med, 62: 718-725. 088068
Zeka A; Zanobetti A; Schwartz J. (2006). Individual-level modifiers of the effects of particulate matter on daily
mortality. Am J Epidemiol, 163: 849-859. 088749
Zhang J; Hu W', Wei F; Wu G; Korn LR; Chapman RS. (2002). Children's respiratory morbidity prevalence in
relation to air pollution in four Chinese cities. Environ Health Perspect, 110: 961-967. 034814
Zhang Z; Whitsel E; Quibrera P; Smith R; Liao D; Anderson G; Prineas R. (2009). Ambient Fine Particulate
Matter Exposure and Myocardial Ischemia in the Environmental Epidemiology of Arrhythmogenesis in
the Women?s Health Initiative (EEAWHI) Study. Environ Health Perspect, 117: 751-756. 191970
July 2009
E-702
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Zhong W> Levin L; Reponen T> Hershey GE Adhikari A; Shukla R; LeMasters G. (2006). Analysis of short-term
influences of ambient aeroallergens on pediatric asthma hospital visits. Sci Total Environ, 370- 330-336.
093264
July 2009
E-703
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Annex F. Source Apportionment Studies
Table F-1. Epidemiologic studies of ambient PM sources, factors, or constituents.
Reference: Andersen
et al. (2007, 093201)
Location: 1 monitor in
Copenhagen, Denmark!
6 years, but
apportionment done for
1.5 year only (2002-
2003)
Particle Size: PMio
Subjects: NR
Exposure: NR
n: NR
Number of
constituents
considered for
grouping: 31
Grouping method: Groups/Factors/ Sources: PM variables used:
PCA + PMF/CMB
hybrid (C0PREM)
ft of groups: 12,
but only 6 used in
relating to health
effects, and CO,
NO?
Road, Vehicle, Salt,
Biomass, Oil, Coal, Rock,
Lime, NaNOs, NH4NO3,
(NH4)2S03, (NH4SO4
Mass contribution of
sources
Results: Single pollutant models: Biomass, secondary compounds, oil, and crustal significantly associated with CVD HA (4 day
moving ave). Biomass and secondary components significantly associated with respiratory HA (5 day moving average). No significant
effects for asthma HA in children (6 day moving average).
Two pollutant models: Crustal effect for CVD admissions remained robust. Biomass effect for respiratory admissions was highest.
Effect of vehicle source remained robust for asthma admissions in children in presence of other PM10 sources.
Reference: Bell et al.
(Bell et al., 2009,
191007)
Location: PM2.B:
2000-2005 (6
years)/106 US
counties/EPA
composition data
PM10: 1987-20001100
counties/EPA
composition data
Particle Size: PM10,
PM2.6
Subjects: NR n: NR Number of Grouping method: Groups/Factors/ Sources: PM variables used:
Exposure'NR constituents NR NR Every component (16
considered for ^ 0j gr0UpS- |\|r elements + NO3, S04,EC,
grouping: 16 0C)
elements + NO3,
S04, EC, 0C
Results: Mortality: Ni significantly increased PM10 mortality risks. However, effect of Ni was not significant when NY City was
removed, in a sensitivity analysis conducted by selectively removing cities from the overall estimate.
Hospital Admissions: CVD and respiratory HAs higher in counties with higher EC, Ni, and V PM2.6. In CVD association between
PM2.E, RR and V robust to inclusion of EC or V, and V robust to inclusion of EC.
Reference: Cakmak et Subjects: NR
n: NR
Number of
al. (2009,191995)
Exposure: 1998-
Location: 1 monitor in 2009 (8.3 years)
Santiago, Chile
Particle Size: PM2.6
Grouping method: Groups/Factors/ Sources: PM variables used:
constituents PCA
considered for
grouping: 16
elements + CO,
N02,S02,EC,0C
tt of groups: 4
Vehicle (CO, NO2, EC, 0C), individual components,
Soil (Al, Ca, Fe, Si), then groupings
Combustion (Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn,
Zn), Factor 4 (Br, CI, Pb)
Results: Individual components: EC, 0C only stat. sign, risk estimates for total, cardiac, and respiratory mortality for 1 day lag
after adjustment for other elements.
Groupings.: Lag 1. Vehicle factor: Increased total mortality, cardiac mortality, and respiratory mortality. Soil factor: increased
cardiac mortality and respiratory mortality (but smaller than vehicle factor RRs). Combustion factor: greatest RR for respiratory
mortality, but significant for total and cardiac mortality. Factor 4: increased total, cardiac, and respiratory mortality. Point estimates
for Factor 1 significantly different from Factors 3 and 4. Elderly had higher risk estimates for combustion and soil sources. No
significant effect modification by gender or season.
Note: Hyperlinks to the reference citations throughout this document will take you to the NCEA HERO database
(Health and Environmental Research Online) at http-//epa.gov/hero. HERO is a database of scientific literature
used by U.S. EPA in the process of developing science assessments such as the Integrated Science Assessments
(ISA) and the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS).
July 2009 F-1 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference: Franklin et
al. (2008,155779)
Location: STNI25
communities/2000-
2005 (6 years)
Particle Size: PM2.B
Subjects: NR
Exposure: NR
n: NR
Number of
constituents
considered for
grouping: 15
elements + EC,
0C, NOs
Grouping method:
# of groups: NR
Groups/Factors/ Sources:
NR
PM variables used:
Every component
Results: The PM2.B-mortality association was significantly modified by Al, As, Sulfate, Ni, and Si. When including a combination of
species proportions and using backwards elimination Al, sulfate, and Ni remained significant. Al and Ni explained most of the residual
heterogeneity.
Reference: Gent et al.
(2009,180399)
Location: 2 monitors
in New Haven, CT/ 3.5
years
Particle Size: PM2.6
Subjects:
Children with
physician
diagnosed asthma
and symptoms or
medication use in
previous 12
months, and
resided within
30km of New
Haven county
monitor
Exposure: NR
n: 149
children
Number of
constituents
considered for
grouping: 17
elements + EC
Grouping method: Groups/Factors/ Sources: PM variables used:
PCA
ft of groups: 6
Vehicle (EC, Zn, Pb, Cu, Se),
road dust (Si, Fe, Al, Ca, Ba,
Ti), sulfur (S, P), biomass
burning, (K) oil (V, Ni), sea
salt (Na, CI)
In addition, effects of NO2,
CO, SO2, and O3 were
included in the health
outcomes model
Groupings and individual
elements
Results: Overall: Trace elements originating from motor vehicle, road dust, biomass burning, and oil sources associated with
symptoms and/or medication use. No associations with S or sea salt.
Specific Results: PM2.6 mass from motor vehicle or road dust associated with increased odds of respiratory symptoms or inhaler use.
Reduced odds of wheeze or inhaler use with same day S. Significant reductions odds of wheeze with biomass burning.
Co-pollutant: Positive effects of motor vehicles and road dust on wheeze were robust to the inclusion of gaseous copollutants.
However, NO2 increases association with wheeze.
Reference: Ito et al. Subjects: NR
(2006,188554) Exposure: NR
Location: Washington,
DC
Particle Size: PM2.6
n: NR
Number of
constituents
considered for
grouping: NR
Grouping method:
Comparison of:
PMF; (absolute)
PCA; UNMIX
# of groups: 6-10
Groups/ Factors/
Sources: Different
research groups
gave different
names to sources
Sources for which
association with health
was analyzed: Soil, traffic,
Secondary SO4, NO3 (Wash
DC only), residual oil (Wash
DC only), Wood smoke/
biomass combustion, Sea
salt, incinerator (Wash DC
only), primary coal (Wash
DC only), Cu smelter
(Phoenix only)
PM variables used:
Mass contribution of
Results: Overall, PM2.6 effects observed at lag 3. Lag structure of association varied across source types, but consistent across
investigators for total (non-accidental mortality): soil factor - mostly positive at various lags (not significant); secondary sulfate -
strongest association at lag 3; nitrate - mostly negative except at lag 3; residual oil - strongest association at lag 2 (not significant);
wood-burning - increasing association as lag increases (not significant); incinerator - significant negative associations at lag 0; primary
coal - significant association at lag 3.
Reference: Laden et
al. (2000, 012102)
Location: Monitors in
6 Eastern US cities
(Harvard Six Cities
Subjects: NR
Exposure: NR
n: NR
Number of
constituents
considered for
grouping: 15
elements
Grouping method:
PCA
# of groups: 8
Groups/ Factors/ Sources:
Soil/Crustal (PM fine),
Mobile vehicle exhaust (PM
fine), Coal (PM fine), Fuel
oil; Metals, Salt'
Manganese, Residual
PM variables used:
Tracers: Si, V, CI, Pb, Se
July 2009 F-2 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
' Results: Lag 0-1 average for all results. Over all 6 cities, mobile source factor (using Pb as tracer) had greatest association with daily
Particle Size: NR mortality (3.4%) with 10 /yglm3 increase. The greatest effects for mortality due to mobile sources were observed in Madison
(Portage), Knoxville (Kingston-Harriman), and St. Louis, although the Madison results were not statistically significant. The coal source
factor was only significant in Boston (Watertown) - 2.8% increase in mortality and the overall percent increase was also significant
(1.1 %). Deaths from pneumonia attributable to coal combustion sources was 7.9% (CI 3.1-12.7%) and statistically significant. The
crustal factor was not associated with mortality in any city, although this factor was not a significant predictor in the regression
model for Boston (Watertown) due to its low contribution to PM2.B mass. For specific elements included simultaneously, S, Pb, and Ni
were significantly associated with overall mortality (3.0,1.6,1.5%, respectively). Boston had the greatest percent increase in
mortality for S (7.9%), Knoxville for Pb (15.0%), and Steubenville for Ni (8.2%), although the CIs are all quite large.
Reanalysis results (Schwartz, 2003): Effects changed slightly. New percent increases in mortality for combined cities are 3.5 and
0.79 for traffic and coal, respectively. The coal factor in Boston decreased to 2.1% increased mortality. A residual oil factor in Boston
and Steubenville resulted in at 22.9% increase in daily deaths (but was not significant in the original analysis).
Reference: Lanki et al.
(2006,088412)
Location: Monitors in
Helsinki, Finland,
Amsterdam,The
Netherlands and Erfurt,
Germany
Particle Size:
UF/PM2.6
Subjects: NR n: NR
Exposure: NR
Number of
constituents
considered for
grouping: 13
elements
Grouping method:
Absolute PCA
ft of groups: 5
Groups/ Factors/ Sources:
Crustal; long range
transported; oil combustion;
soil; traffic
PM variables used:
Tracers: Si (crustal); S
(long-range transport); Ni
(oil combustion); CI (salt);
ABS (local traffic).
Results: Highest observed effects were for crustal sources and salt at lag 3 (when analyzing sources), but not consistent or
significant. In multipollutant models only ABS associated with ST-segment depression, but wide CIs. When examining indicator
elements of a source, local traffic found to be the most toxic, but when examined per IQR long-range transport and traffic had similar
effects.
Results: All had significant associations with mortality. Traffic density and EC had the largest effects.
Reference: Lippmann
et al. (2006, 091165)
Location: U.S.
Particle Size: PM10
for risk estimates,
PM2.6 for speciation
data
Subjects: NR
Exposure: NR
n: NR
Number of
constituents
considered for
grouping: NR
Grouping method:
No grouping was
performed
# of groups: NR
Groups/ Factors/ Sources: PM variables used:
NR Mass contribution of 16
constituents
Results: The strongest predictions of the variation in PM10 risk estimates across the 90 NMMAPs MSAs was for Ni and V. Elevated,
but nonsignificant increases were associated with EC, Zn, SOr', Cu, Pb, and OC. Al and Si had the lowest values.
Reference: Mar et al.
(2000,001760)
Location: 1 monitor in
Phoenix, AZ
Particle Size: NR
Subjects: Elderly n: NR
only
Exposure: NR
Number of
constituents
considered for
grouping: 10
elements, OC, EC,
CO, NO?; SO2
Grouping method: Groups/ Factors/ Sources: PM variables used:
Unspecified type of Motor exhaust/road dust,
factor analysis soil, vegetative burning,
tt of groups: 3 or 5 local SO2, regional S04
First used individual
constituents: S, Zn, Pb,
K, OC, EC, TC
(AL+Si+Ca+Fe+Ti),
then factor scores
Results: Cardiovascular mortality associated with PM2.6 mass on lag 1 and 4 (6 and 4%, respectively). EC and TC associated with CV
mortality for lag 1 (RR - 1.05); OC was weakly associated with CV mortality for lags 1 and 3. For total mortality, regional sulfate
was positively associated at lag 0, but negatively associated at lag 3. The local SO2 and the soil factors were negatively associated
with total mortality. For CV mortality, secondary sulfate was positively associated at lag 0, motor vehicle at lag 1, and vegetative
burning at lag 3.
Reanalysis results (Mar, 2003): Similar associations were observed.
Reference: Mar et al. Subjects: NR n: NR
(2006,086143) Exposure: NR
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Particle Size: PM2.6
Number of Grouping method:
constituents Comparison of: PMF
considered for (absolute); PCA;
grouping: NR UNMIX
# of groups: 6-10
Groups/ Factors/
Sources: Different
labs gave different
names to sources
(see Hopke et al,
table 2)
Sources for which PM variables used:
association with health Mass contribution of
was analyzed: Soil, Traffic, sources
secondary SO4, NO3, (Wash
DC only), residual oil (Wash
DC only), woodsmokef
biomass combustion, sea
salt, incinerator (Wash DC
only); primary coal (Wash
DC only); Cu smelter
(Phoenix only)
Results: Using daily PM2.6 data found the following associations with cardiovascular mortality: Secondary sulfate - greatest effect
observed for all sources and at lag 0; traffic - associated at lag 1; copper smelter associated at lag 0; sea salt - had the greatest
statistical significance and observed at lag 5; biomassfwood burning - less consistent lag structure but greatest association at lag 3;
soil - did not show an association or consistent lag structure. For total (non-accidental) mortality associations were weaker and
consistently observed for only: copper smelter - lag 0; sea salt - lag 5.
July 2009
F-3
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference: Ostro et
al. (2007, 091354)
Location: Monitors in
6 CA counties, some
with 2 monitors, for 4
years
Particle Size: PM2.B
Subjects NR n: NR
Exposure: NR
Number of con-
stituents consi-
dered for
grouping: 15
elements, EC, 0C;
NO3; SO4, PM2.6
mass
Grouping method:
No grouping was
performed
# of groups: NA
Groups/ Factors/ Sources: PM variables used:
NR Mass contribution of
every constituent
Results: Effects were greater during the winter months. In the all year analysis, at 3-day lag associations observed for EC, 0C, NO3
and Zn. During winter months (Oct -March) effects observed for most species for both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality at lag 3
(EC, 0C, SO4, Ca, Fe, K, Mn, Pb, S, Si, Ti, Zn) and (0C, NO3, SO4, Fe, Mn, S, V, Zn), respectively.
Reference: Ostro et
al. (2009,191971)
Location: Monitors in
6 CA counties, some
with 2 monitors/4
years
Particle Size: PM2.B
Subjects NR
Exposure: NR
n: NR
Number of
constituents
considered for
grouping: 9
elements,EC, 0C,
PM2.6 mass, SO4,
NOs
Grouping method:
No grouping was
performed
# of groups: NA
Groups/ Factors/ Sources:
NR
PM variables used:
Mass contribution of
every constituent
Results: The following associations were observed with cardiovascular mortality: PM2.6 (lag 3); EC (lag 2); NO3 (lag 3); SOi (lag 3); Fe
(lag 2); K (lag 2); S (lag 3); Ti (lag 2); Zn (lag 3).
Reference: Peng et al.
(2009,191998)
Location: 119 urban
communities STN
data/2000-2006
Particle Size: PM2.6
Subjects: n: NR Number of Grouping method: Groups/Factors/ Sources: PM variables used:
Medicare enrollees constituents NR Only suggested in discussion Tracers
65 or older considered for #ofgroUpS:NR
Exposure: NR grouping: S04,
NOs, Si, EC, 0CM,
Na, NH4
Results: CVD HA's: EC associated with same-day CVD HA's in single and multi-pollutant models. In single pollutant models
associations also observed for sulfate, nitrate, 0CM, and ammonium. However, the sulfate, nitrate, 0CM, and ammonium associations
were reduced in the multi-pollutant models.
Respiratory HA's: 0CM associated with same-day respiratory HA's in single and multi-pollutant models. Some evidence for sulfate
associations at one and two-day lag.
Reference: Penttinen Subjects: Adult n: 78
et al. (2006, 087988) asthma subjects,
Location: Helsinki
max 2 km from
1996-1997 (7 months) sin9le monitor
Particle Size: PM2 B Exposure: NR
Number of
constituents
considered for
grouping:
Unknown
Grouping method: Groups/Factors/ Sources: PM variables used:
PCA
ft of groups: 6
Long range (PM mass, S, K, every component
Zn), local combustion-traffic individually, then
(Cu, Zn, Mn, Fe), soil (Si, Al, groupings
Ca, Fe, Mn), oil (V, Ni), salt
(Na, CI), unidentified
Results: Long range PM2.6 associated with decreased mean PEF in the morning at lag 1. Local combustion PM2.6 associated with
decreased mean PEF in the evening for lag 1. Local combustion PM2.6 associated with decreased mean PEF in the afternoon and
evening for 5-day mean lag. Negative significant association between long-range PM2.6 and asthma symptom prevalence at lag 3. Sea-
salt PM2.E negatively associated with bronchodilator use at lag 3 and 5-day mean lag. Sea-salt PM2.6 negatively associated with
corticosteroid use for 5-day mean lag. Unidentified PM2.6 negatively associated with corticosteroid use at lag 1. Most consistent
negative responses for local combustion, although not always significant. No consistent or significant associations between 5-day
average concentrations of elements and PEF, cough, asthma symptoms, or medication use.
Reference: Riediker et
al. (2004, 091261)
Location: Inside 9
state police patrol cars
Particle Size: PM2.6
Subjects: Healthy n: 9
male young police
officers
Exposure: 4
consecutive days
Number of
constituents
considered for
grouping: 10
elements; 3
gaseous
pollutants; 2
physical variables
Grouping method:
PCA
# of groups: 4
when 13 + 2
constituents
included; 3 when
only 9
"PM-associated"
constituents
included
Groups/ Factors/ Sources:
Soil; automotive steel wear;
gasoline combustion;
speed-changing traffic
PM variables used:
Mass contribution or
score of sources
Results: Using two different factor analysis models found most significant effects (MCL, SDNN, PNN50, supraventricular ectopic
beats, % neutrophils, % lymphocytes, MCV, von Willebrand Factor, and protein C) were for "speed-change factor" (i.e., Cu, S,
aldehydes). Some associations observed for "crustal" and none for "steel wear" and "gasoline."
July 2009
F-4
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference: Sarnat et
al. (2008, 097972)
Location: 1 monitor in
Atlanta. GA for 2 yrs
Particle Size: PM2.6
Subjects: NR n: NR
Exposure: NR
Number of
constituents
considered for
grouping: NR
Grouping method:
Comparison of:
PMF, CMB-LG0,"a
priori decision"
# of groups: 9,11
(6 of them common
between methods)
Groups/ Factors/ Sources:
gasoline, diesel, wood
smokef biomass burning,
soil, secondary
S04fammonium sulfate,
seconddary nitrate!
ammonium nitrate, metal
processing, railroad, bus and
highway, cement kiln,
power plants, other 0C,
ammonium bisulfate
PM variables used:
Mass contribution or
score of sources, and
tracers
Results: Sulfate secondary associated with 1.2 - 2.0% increase in RD visits, significant negative association RD visits and primary
emissions from coal-fired power plants. CVD significantly associated with other OC (1.014), biomass (1.033), diesel and gas for
CMB-LGO. For PMF and CVD visits: diesel (1.025), gas, wood smoke, metal processing (1.013). Year long associations: PMF diesel,
EC, CMB LGO gas, Zn and biomass combustion sources (CMB LGO biomass burning, PMF wood smoke, and K). Diesel and gas sources
association with RD in the warm season (1.2-2.1 % per IQR).
Reference: Schreuder Subjects: NR n: NR
et al. (2006, 097959)
Location: 1 monitor in
Spokane, WA for 7
years
Particle Size: PM2.6
Reference: Tsaiet al.
(2000,006251)
Location: 3 NJ sites
for 2 summers (ATEOS
study)
Particle Size: NR
Exposure: NR
Number of
constituents
considered for
grouping: 11
elements, TC, NO3
Grouping method: Groups/ Factors/ Sources: PM variables used:
Comparison of:
PMF, UNMIX,
Multilinear Engine
# of groups: 8
Vegetative burning: As-rich Tracers: TC (vegetative
Vehicle: SO4; NO3; Soil; burning): As (As-rich); Zn
Cu-rich; Marine (vehicle); Si (soil)
Results: Si, As, and Zn were not associated with any health outcomes; while an IQR increase in TC (vegetative burning) was
associated with a 2% increase in respiratory ED visits.
Subjects: NR
Exposure: NR
N: NR
Number of
constituents
considered for
grouping: 8
metals, IPM, FPM,
S04, CX, DCM,
ACE, CO
Grouping method: Groups/ Factors/ Sources: PM variables used:
Unspecified type of Oil burning, motor
factor analysis
# of groups: 5
emissions, resuspended
dust, secondary aerosol,
industrial sources
individual constituents,
then factor scores, then
tracers
Results: RR associated with 10 //gfm3 increases: Newark -1.03 for industrial and total daily deaths; 1.02 for sulfate and total daily
deaths; 1.04 for sulfate and cardiopulmonary deaths. Camden -1.11 for oil burning sources and total daily deaths; 1.10 industrial and
total daily deaths; 1.12 for oil burning sources and cardiopulmonary daily deaths; 1.02 for sulfate and cardiopulmonary daily deaths
Reference: Yue et al. Subjects: Adult n: 56, data Number of
Grouping method: Groups/ Factors/ Sources: PM variables used:
(2007,097968)
Location: 1 monitor in
German city, 30.000
samples
Particle Size:
UF/PM2.6
males
Exposure: CAD
collected 12
times over 6
month for
every
subject, but
extended
period of
missing PM
data
constituents
considered for
grouping:
Apportionment
based on particle
size distribution.
PMF
# of groups: 5
Airborne soil, local traffic,
local fuel combustion,
remote traffic (diesel),
secondary aerosols
Mass contribution or
score of sources
Results: Overall, repolarization parameters influenced by traffic-related particles; vWF increased in response to traffic-related
particles and combustion-generated aerosols. All source factors contributed to increasing CRP levels.
Table F-2. Human clinical studies of ambient PM sources, factors, or constituents.
Study: Gong et al.
(2003, 042106)
Location: Los
Angeles, CA
Particle Size: PM2.6
Subjects: Adult
18-45, healthy vs.
asthmatic
Exposure: CAPs,
healthy and
asthmatic subjects
exposed at different
times
N: 12 healthy, 12
asthmatic
Constituents
considered for
grouping: 7
elements, EC, NO3,
S04
Grouping method:
PCA
ft of groups: 4 (note:
0C data was
unavailable)
Groups/ Factors/
Sources: Crustal (Al
Si CA K Fe),S (2
metrics of SO4 +
elemental S), Total
Mass+N03, EC
PM variables used:
Total mass, then
tracers: SO4, EC, Fe
July 2009
F-5
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Results: Fe and EC associated with a decrease in ST-segment voltage 2 days post exposure. EC associated with an increase in ST-
segment voltage immediately following exposure. Sulfate content associated with a decrease in systolic BP 4 h post exposure.
Study: Gong et al.
(2005,087921)
Location: Los
Angeles, CA
Particle Size: PM2
Reference: Huang
et al. (2003,
087377)
Location: Chapel
Hill, NC
Particle Size: PM2.6
Subjects: Elderly, N: 6 healthy, 18
COPD vs. healthy/ COPD
CAPs
Exposure: NO2 (full
factorial)
Constituents
considered for
grouping: 7
elements
+ EC
Grouping method:
PCA
ft of groups: 3 (note:
Si CA K Fe),
0C was unavailable) ® S(M,Na
Groups/ Factors/ PM variables used:
Sources: Crustal (Al Total mass, then
tracers:, SO4, Si, Fe,
EC
Results: Mass concentration of CAPs not observed to significantly affect lung function. However, sulfate content was associated with
a decrease lung function (FEVi and FVC), which was enhanced by coexposure to NO2.
Subjects: Healthy
adults
Exposure: CAPs
N: 35 male; 2 female Constituents
considered for
grouping: 8
elements and SO4
Grouping method:
PCA
# of groups: 2
Groups/ Factors/
Sources:
Fe/S04/Se/V/Zn/Cu
PM variables used:
Factor scores, then
mass contribution of
all 9 constituents
Results: Associations observed between sulfate,Zn, and Se content and increases in BAL neutrophils. Increases in fibrinogen associated
with Cu, Zn, and V content.
Reference: Urch et
al. (2004, 055629)
Location: Toronto,
Canada
Particle Size: PM2.6
Subjects: Healthy N: 23
adults 19-50
yrs/CAPs
Exposure: O3
Constituents Grouping method: Groups/ Factors/
considered for No grouping was Sources: NR
grouping: unknown performed
# of groups: NA
PM variables used:
Every constituent in
univariate analysis,
then 0C and SO4 in
multivariate analysis
Results: CAPs-induced increase in diastolic BP significantly associated with carbon content of the particles.
Reference: Urch et
al. (2004, 055629)
Location: Toronto,
Canada
Particle Size: PM2.6.
Subjects: Healthy
adults/CAPs
Exposure: O3
N: 24
Constituents
considered for
grouping: 14
elements, EC, 0C
Grouping method: Groups/ Factors/
No grouping was Sources: NR
performed
# of groups: NA
PM variables used:
Every constituent in
univariate analysis,
then 0C and SO4 in
multivariate analysis
Results: Both organic and EC content of CAPs associated with an increase in brachial artery vasoconstriction.
Table F-3. Toxicological studies of ambient PM sources, factors, or constituents
Reference:
Batalha et al.
(2002,
088109)
Location:
Boston, MA
Particle Size:
PM2.6
Subjects: Rats
Exposure: CAPs
(3-day mean CAPs
concentration range:
126.1 -481.0/yg|m3)
CAPs (3-day mean
CAPs concentration
range: 126.1-481.0
/yg/m3)
n: 7-10 rats x 2
levels CAPs x 2
levels SO2 x 6
runs in different
seasons
Constituents
considered for
grouping: 20
elements: 0C; EC
Grouping
method: Previous
study in same city
(Clarke et al.), and
PCA of this
experiment's data
# of groups:4
Groups/ Factors/ Sources:
V/Ni, S, Al/Si, Br/Pb
PM variables used:
4 tracers (Si, SO4, V,
Pb) and EC, 0C in
univariate step. 4
tracers (Si, SO4, V,
Pb) in multivariate
step
Results: Univariate analyses for first day not significant for L/W ratio. Univariate analyses for second and third day and second+third day
mean were similar. Presented second+third day mean regression data. CAPs mass, Si, Pb, SO4, EC, 0C significant for decreased L/W ratio in
normal+CB rats exposed to CAPs. Si, SO4 significant for decreased L/W ratio in normal rats. Si, 0C significant for decreased L/W ratio in CB
rats. Multivariate analysis using normal + CB rats for Si, SO4, V, Pb - only Si remained significant with decreased L/W ratio.
Reference:
Subjects: Normal n: NR
Constituents
Grouping
Groups/ Factors/ Sources:
PM variables used:
Becker et al.
human bronchial
considered for
method: PCA
Cr/AI/Si/Ti/Fe/Cu ("crustal"),
NR
(2005,
epithelial and human
grouping: 12
# of groups: 2
Zn/As/V/Ni/Pb/
088590)
AM
elements
Se
Location:
Exposure: (2-3X106
Chapel Hill,
cells/mL; 11 or 50
NC; repeated
/yg/mL)
July 2009
F-6
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
samp ing or Resu|ts: Cr/AI/Si/Ti/Fe/Cu associated with IL-8 release in normal human bronchial epithelial cells and IL-6 release in AM. Zn/As/V/Ni/Pb/Se not
^8ar associated with any endpoints. Stepwise linear regression with individual constituents Fe and Si associated with IL-6 release in AM. Cr
Particle Size: associated with IL-8 release in NHBE cells.
PMio
Reference:
Clarke et al.
(2000,
013252)
Location:
Boston, MA
Particle Size:
PM2.6
Subjects: [
n: 10 dogs, 20 Constituents
Exposure: CAPs Paired
(average for all studies, exPosures' 24
paired: 203.4, crossover
crossover: 360.8
/yg/m3) repeated
exposure with several
weeks in between
considered for
grouping: 19
elements, black C
Grouping
method: PCA
ft of groups: 4
for exposure in
paired runs,6 for
exposure in
crossover runs
Groups/ Factors/ Sources: PM variables used:
V/Ni, S, Al/Si, Br/Pb, S, Na/CI
Cr
All elements, then
factor scores
Results: No significant differences between baseline, sham, or CAPs group for BAL cell differential percentages. Total BAL protein increased
with CAPs compared to sham. No significant hematological effects with CAPs exposure. Mixed linear regression analyses (statistics not
provided): Al and Ti (3-day avg. concentrations) associated with dose-dependent decreases in BAL AM and increases in BAL PMN percentages.
Sulfate associated with increased WBC. BC, Al, Mn, Si, Zn, Ti, V, Fe, Ni associated with increased blood PMN. Na associated with increased
blood lymphocytes. Al, Mn, Si associated with decreased blood lymphocytes. CAPs mass and BC associated with decreased blood eosinophils.
CAPs mass associated with decreased platelet count. Regression using results of factor analysis: None for 3-day avg. concentration for BAL
parameters. V/I\li for increased AM percentage and Br/Pb for increased PMN percentage for 3rd-day only concentration. V/I\li and Al/Si for
increased blood PMN percentage and decreased blood lymphocyte percentage. Al/Si also for increased WBC counts. Na/CI for increased blood
lymphocyte percentage. S for decreased RBC and hemoglobin.
Reference:
Duvall et al.
(2008,
097969)
Location: 5
US cities
Particle Size:
PM2.6
Reference:
Godleski et al.
(2002,
156478)
Location:
Boston, MA
Particle Size:
NR
Subjects Primary
human airway
epithelial cells
(100,000 cells/mL;
dose not provided)
Exposure: NR
n: NR
Constituents
considered for
grouping: NR
Grouping
method: CMB,
but not on coarse
and ultrafine
ft of groups: 6 or
7
Groups/ Factors/ Sources: PM variables used:
Mobile, residual, oil, wood, Mass contribution of
soil, secondary SO4, secondary constituents, then
NO3 mass contribution of
sources
Results: Linear regression with individual constituents: Sulfate associated with increased IL-8 mRNA expression. Sr associated with
increased COX-2 and decreased H0-1 mRNA expressions. K associated with decreased HO-1 mRNA expression.
Linear regression with sources: Significance levels not provided.
Subjects: Rats
Exposure: CAPs
(3-day mean CAPs
concentration range:
126.1 -481.0/yg/m3)
n: 7-10 rats x 2
levels CAPs x 2
levels SO2 x 6
runs in different
seasons
Constituents
considered for
grouping: 20
elements, 0C, EC
Grouping
method: Previous
study in same city
(Clarke et al.), and
PCA of this
experiment's data
# of groups: 4
Groups/ Factors/ Sources:
V/Ni, S, Al/Si/Ca, Br/Pb
PM variables used:
4 tracers (I, S04,V,
Pb) and EC, 0C
Results: Increased percent of PMNs in BALF in CAPs-exposed rats at 24 h. CAPs affected lung tissue mRNA involved in pro-inflammation,
immune, and vascular endothelial responses. Linear regression: Increased PMN associated with CAPs mass, Br, Pb, SO4, EC, and 0C.
Reference:
Gurgueira et
al. (2002,
036535)
Location:
Boston, MA carbon black and R0FA
Subjects Rats
(Sprague Dawley)
Exposure: CAPs (avg.
mass concentration
600/yg/m3); also
n: 13 Constituents
experiments (1 considered for
rat/group at each grouping: 20
time point) elements
Grouping
method: No
grouping was
performed
# of groups: NA
Groups/ Factors/ Sources:
NR
PM variables used:
Mass contribution of
every constituent
Particle Size:
PM2.6
Results: Increased oxidative stress in heart and lungs following CAPs exposure (and R0FA exposure).
Univariate regression: Mn, Zn, Fe, Cu, and Ca most significant responses for lung (r2> 0 .40). Al, Si, Ti, Fe, and total mass most significant
response for heart (r2 > 0.49).
Reference: Subjects Rats (SH and n: 6 1 -day,
Constituents
Kodavanti et
al. (2005,
087946)
Location:
RTP.NC
Particle Size:
PM2.6
WKY)
Exposure: CAPs
(144-2758 jjg/m3)
1 -strain runs, 7 considered for
2-day, 2-strain grouping: NR
runs, 4-9 rats
per run.
Grouping
method: No
grouping was
performed
# of groups: NA
Groups/ Factors/ Sources:
NR
PM variables used:
Mass contribution of
every constituent
Results: No significant correlations between biologic responses and exposure variables (i.e., CAP mass, 0C, inorganic C, sulfate, and other
major elemental constituents). Al, Cu, Zn correlated with biologic responses when constituents normalized per unit mass of CAP (/L/g/mg). Zn
correlated with plasma fibrinogen in SH rats (p - 0.0023).
July 2009 F-7 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference:
Lippmann et al.
(2005,
087453)
Location:
Rural location
upwind from
NYC
Particle Size:
PM2.6
Subjects: Mice (C57
and ApoE)
Exposure: CAPs (avg.
mass concentration
113/yg/m3)
n: C57: 3-6
mice/group
ApoE1": 9-10
mice/group
Constituents
considered for
grouping: 19
elements + 0C, EC,
NOs
Grouping
method:
(Absolute) PCA
ft of groups: 4
Groups/ Factors/ Sources:
Regional SO4 (S/Si/OC);
Resuspended soil sources
(CA/Fe/AI/Si);R0 power plants
(V/Ni/Se);
Traffic and unknown
PM variables used:
Mass contribution of
Results: ApoE null mice: Resuspended soil associated with decreased HR during exposure, but increased HR after exposure. Secondary
sulfate associated with decreased HR after exposure. Residual oil associated with increased RMSSD and SDNN in afternoon following
exposure. Secondary sulfate associated with decreased RMSSD and SDNN in night following exposure. Resuspended soil associated with
increased RMSSD at night following exposure. PM mass associated with decreased HR during exposure and decreased RMSSD at night
following exposure.
C57 mice: Motor vehicle/other source category associated with decrease in RMSSD in afternoon following exposure
Subjects: Mice (ApoE'
)
Exposure: CAPs (avg.
mass concentration
85.6 jjg/m3)
n: 12 ApoE1
mice (6/group)
Number of
constituents
considered for
grouping: NR
Grouping
method: No
grouping was
performed
# of groups: NR
Groups/ Factors/ Sources:
NR
Reference:
Lippmann et al.
(2006,
091165)
Location:
Rural location
upwind from
NYC
Results: Lag for HR elevations on 14 days with wind from NW was same day. Lag for SDNN reduction on 14 days with wind from NW was
Particle Size: 0,1 and 2.
PM26 ana|ysjs: b coefficient significant for Ni and HR (but not V, Cr, or Fe). B coefficient significant for Ni and log SDNN (but not V, Cr, or
Fe).
PM variables used:
Mass contribution of
every constituent in
CAPs portion of
study, contribution of
16 constituents in epi
portion
Reference:
Maciejczyk
and Chen
(2005,
087456)
Location:
Rural; upwind
from NYC
Particle Size:
PM2.6
Subjects: NR
Exposure: CAPs
(90000/well; 300
/yg/mL)
n: 110 samples Constituents
considered for
grouping: 19
elements + 0C, EC,
NOs
Grouping
method:
(Absolute) PCA
# of groups: 4
Groups/ Factors/ Sources:
Regional SO4
Soil; Unknown
Oil combustion
PM variables used:
Mass contribution of
sources
Results: Correlation: V and Ni positively correlated with NF-nB. Oil combustion correlated the greatest with NF-nB (0.316). Significance not
provided. Only 2% of mass contribution originates from this source.
Reference:
Nikolovet al.
(2008,
156808)
Location:
Boston, MA
Particle Size:
NR
Subjects: D
Exposure:
n: 8 dogs, 24
exposure-days in
1997-98:4
dogs, 21
exposure-days in
2001-02
Constituents
considered for
grouping: 13
elements, BC, EC,
0C
Grouping
method:
Compared 3
factor-analytic
models within a
SEM model
# of groups: 4
Groups/ Factors/ Sources:
Oil Combustion VfNi; Power
Plants S ;Road dust
Al/Si ;Motor vehicles
BC/0C/EC
PM variables used:
Mass contribution of
every constituent
Results: Univariate response for respiratory outcomes: road dust and oil combustion associated with decreased respiratory frequency;
motor vehicles associated with increased respiratory frequency; motor vehicles associated with increased PEF; road dust associated with
decreased penh and motor vehicles associated with increased penh.
Multivariate responses for respiratory outcome: Road dust associated with decreased respiratory rate; Motor vehicles associated with
increased airway irritation.
Reference:
Rhoden et al.
(2004,
087969)
Location:
Boston, MA
Particle Size:
PM2.6
Subjects Rats
(Sprague Dawley)
Exposure: CAPs (avg.
mass concentration
range 150-2520
/yg/m3) acetylcysteine
full factorial
n: 4-8 rats (1 -2 Constituents
per group - sham, considered for
CAPs,
sham/NAC,
CAP/NAC)
10 exposures
grouping: 20
elements
Grouping
method: No
grouping was
performed
# of groups: NA
Groups/ Factors/ Sources:
NR
PM variables used:
Mass contribution of
every constituent
Results: Increased oxidative stress and inflammation in lungs of CAPs animals that was attenuated with NAC.
Univariate regression: Al, Si, Fe, K, Pb, and Cu most significantly correlated with lung TBARS. No significant correlations for lung carbonyls
or lung PMN.
July 2009 F-8 DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference:
Saldiva et al.
(2002,
025988)
Location:
Boston, MA
Particle Size:
PM2.6
Subjects: Rats
(Sprague Dawley
Exposure: CAPs
(3-day avg. mass
concentration range
126.1-481 /yglm3)
n: 7-10
Constituents
Grouping
Groups/ Factors/ Sources:
PM variables used:
rats/group
considered for
method: Previous
V/Ni
Mass contribution of
(air/sham.
grouping: 15
study in same city
S
8 elelments in
S02/sham,
elements (used Clarke
(Clarke et al.
Al/Si
univariate step.
air/CAP,
2000 to select
2000)
Br/Pb
Tracers (Si, SO4, V,
SO2/CAP) X 6
tracers)
# of groups: 6
Pb, Br, CI) and EC, OC
runs in different
Na/CI
in multivariate step.
seasons
Cr
Results: Increased percent and number of PMN in majority of air and SO2 rats exposed to CAPs, but significance levels not provided.
Other responses (protein, LDH, NAG) were variable and depended upon the CAPs exposure. No CAPs effect on histopathology.
Linear regression: V, Br, Pb, SOi, EC, 0C, Si, CAP mass associated with increased PMN and lymphocytes for normal+CB rats. Only V not
associated with PMN in normal rats. Lymphocyte response due to CB rats, but not observed for SO4, Si, or mass in this group. Br, Pb, SO4,
EC, OC, Si associated with increased total protein in CB rats. CI and V associated with decreased LDH in CB rats. No BAL effects in normal
rats exposed to CAPs. V, Br, Pb, EC, OC, and CI associated with increased neutrophil density in lungs of normal rats.
Reference:
Seagrave et al.
(2006,
091291)
Location: 4
SE US sites for
2 seasons
Particle Size:
PM2.6
Subjects Rats (Fisher n: 5 rats/dose
344)
Exposure: 0.75,1.5
and 3 mg/rat via
intratracheal
instillation
Constituents
considered for
grouping: NR
Grouping
method: CMB
ft of groups: 13
Groups/ Factors/ Sources:
secondary NO3; secondary
NH4; secondary SO4; coke
production; vegetative detri-
PM variables used:
Mass contribution of
every constituent,
then mass
tus; natural gas combust; road contribution of
dust; wood combust; meat sources
cooking gasoline; diesel other
OM; other mass
Results: Potency depended upon season and site of sample collection. In general, effects were greater in the winter.
PLS analysis: 2 major constituents identified (OC, Pb, hopanesfsteranes, nitrate, As for first and major metal oxides for the second), gasoline
most important predictor for both constituents, with diesel influencing second constituent and nitrate influencing first constituent. First
constituent affected cytotoxic responses, second constituent affected inflammatory responses.
Reference:
Veranth et al.
(2006,
087479)
Location: 8
sites in the
Western US
Particle Size:
PM2.6
Subjects BEAS-2B
cells (35000 cells/cm2;
10,20, 40,80
/yg/cm2)
Exposure: Loose
surface soil sweepings
through mechanical
tumbler and cascade
impactor
n: 6; 16 runs
over 6 months.
Constituents
considered for
grouping: 13
elements, TC, 5 OC
variables, 4 EC
variables, 2 ions, EU,
one ratio (Ca: Al), OP,
C03
Grouping
method: PLS
# of groups: P
Groups/ Factors/ Sources: PM variables used:
NR Mass contribution
every constituent (?)
Results: Dose-related increase in IL-6 and decreases in cell viability for all soil types. IL-8 responses more variable and dependent upon soil
type. Univariate correlations. Low correlations for all constituents tested with IL-6. Highest correlations for EC1 (R2 - 0.50) and pyrolyzed
OC (R2 - 0.46), then Ca/AI (R2 - 0.21). Carbonate carbon, EC3, and Sr correlated with IL-8 (R2 - 0.27, 0.13, and 0.25, respectively). EC
and Ni correlated with IL-8 trend over the range of 10-80//g/cm2 (R2 - 0.39 and 0.27, respectively). Multivariate redundancy analysis 0C1,
0C3, 0C2, EC2, Br, EC1, Ni correlated with IL-8 release, decreased viability, and decreased IL-6 at low and high doses. Ni, EC1, and EC2
correlated with IL-6 release at the high dose, decreased IL-6 at the low dose, decreased IL-8 release, and decreased viability. Br was
negatively associated.
Reference:
Wellenius et al.
(2003,
055691)
Location:
Boston, MA
Particle Size:
PM2.6
Subjects: Dogs
Exposure: CAPs (avg.
mass concentration
range 161.3-957.3
/yg/m3) repeated
exposure with several
weeks in between
n: 6 dogs, 20 Constituents
Grouping
Groups/ Factors/ Sources: PM variables used:
exposures considered for method: Previous VfNi
grouping: 15 study in same city S
elements (+EC OC?) (Clarke et al. Al/Si
(used Clarke et al. 2000) Br/Pb
2000)
tt of groups: 6
(but did not use all
in analysis of
health effects)
Na/CI
Cr
Univariate: Mass
Number
Ni, S, Si, BC
Multivariate: Ni, S,
Si, BC
Results: ST-segment elevation increased with CAPs.
Univariate regression: Si and Pb associated with peak ST-segment elevation and integrated ST-segment change.CAPs mass or number
concentration were not associated with any change.
Multivariate regression: Si associated with peak ST-segment elevation and integrated ST-segment change.
July 2009
F-9
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Reference:
Zhang et al.
(2008,
192008)
Location:
Metro area of
Denver, CO I
45 samples
through 1 year
Particle Size:
2.5; filtered to
0.22 um
Subjects: Alveolar
macrophage cell line
(NR8383); 1x106
cells/ml
Exposure: Soluble
components exposure
concentration range
from 20-200 pg of
PM/cell
n: 45 PM
samples, 3 runs
Constituents
considered for
grouping: 43 +
0C
EC,
Grouping
method: PMF
ft of groups: 9
Groups/Factors/ Sources:
Mobile, Water soluble carbon,
Sulfate, Soil, Iron, Cd and Zn
point source, Pb,
Pyrotechniques, Platinum
PM variables used:
Mass contribution of
Results: Started with regression on 9 sources, then 3 (water-soluble carbon factor, soil dust source, iron source). Soil dust source was not
significant. Final regression model excluded 3 days of outliers (Fe source most significant, then water-soluble carbon factor, then soil dust
source) for R0S effects, with adjusted R2 of 0.774. Fe source likely associated with industrial source and includes high loadings of water-
soluble Fe and Ti (not identified); water-soluble C factor derived from both secondary organic aerosol and biomass smoke (largely consists of
polar organic compounds); soil dust source identified by water-soluble resuspended dust elements and contains Mg and Ca.
July 2009
F-10
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Annex F References
Andersen ZJ> Wahlin Pi Raaschou-Nielsen 0> Scheike T> Loft S. (2007). Ambient particle source
apportionment and daily hospital admissions among children and elderly in Copenhagen. J Expo
Sci Environ Epidemiol, 17- 625-636. 093201
Batalha JR; Saldiva P H; Clarke RW! Coull BA; Stearns RC; Lawrence J; Murthy GG; Koutrakis Pi
Godleski JJ. (2002). Concentrated ambient air particles induce vasoconstriction of small
pulmonary arteries in rats. Environ Health Perspect, 110- 1191-1197. 088109
Becker Si Mundandhara Si Devlin RBi Madden M. (2005). Regulation of cytokine production in human
alveolar macrophages and airway epithelial cells in response to ambient air pollution particles-
further mechanistic studies. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 207: 269-275. 088590
Bell MLi Ebisu K> Peng RDi Dominici F. (2009). Adverse health effects of particulate air pollution:
modification by air conditioning. Epidemiology, in press: in press. 191007
Cakmak Si Dales Ri Vida C. (2009). Components of particulate air pollution and mortality in Chile. Int
J Occup Environ Health, 15: 152. 191995
Clarke RWi Coull Bi Reinisch Ui Catalano Pi Killingsworth CRi Koutrakis Pi Kavouras Ii Murthy GGKi
Lawrence Ji Lovett Ei Wolfson JMi Verrier RLi Godleski JJ. (2000). Inhaled concentrated
ambient particles are associated with hematologic and bronchoalveolar lavage changes in
canines. Environ Health Perspect, 108: 1179-1187. 013252
Duvall RMi Norris GAi Dailey LAi Burke JMi McGee JKi Gilmour ML Gordon Ti Devlin RB. (2008).
Source apportionment of particulate matter in the US and associations with lung inflammatory
markers. Inhal Toxicol, 20: 671-83. 097969
Franklin Mi Koutrakis Pi Schwartz J. (2008). The role of particle composition on the association
between PM2.5 and mortality. Epidemiology, 19: 680-689. 155779
Gent JFi Koutrakis Pi Belanger Ki Triche Ei Holford TRi Bracken MBi Leaderer BP. (2009). Symptoms
and medication use in children with asthma and traffic-related sources of fine particle pollution.
Environ Health Perspect, In Press: 1-41. 180399
Godleski JJi Clarke RWi Coull BAi Saldiva PHNi Jiang NFi Lawrence Ji Koutrakis P. (2002).
Composition of inhaled urban air particles determines acute pulmonary responses. Ann Occup
Hyg, 46: 419-424. 156478
Gong H Jri Linn WSi Clark KWi Anderson KRi Geller MDi Sioutas C. (2005). Respiratory responses to
exposures with fine particulates and nitrogen dioxide in the elderly with and without COPD.
Inhal Toxicol, 17: 123-132. 087921
Gong H Jri Linn WSi Sioutas Ci Terrell SLi Clark KWi Anderson KRi Terrell LL. (2003). Controlled
exposures of healthy and asthmatic volunteers to concentrated ambient fine particles in Los
Angeles. Inhal Toxicol, 15: 305-325. 042106
Gurgueira SAi Lawrence Ji Coull Bi Murthy GGKi Gonzalez-Flecha B. (2002). Rapid increases in the
steady-state concentration of reactive oxygen species in the lungs and heart after particulate air
pollution inhalation. Environ Health Perspect, 110: 749-755. 036535
Huang Y-CTi Ghio AJi Stonehuerner Ji McGee Ji Carter JDi Grambow SCi Devlin RB. (2003). The role
of soluble components in ambient fine particles-induced changes in human lungs and blood.
Inhal Toxicol, 15: 327-342. 087377
Ito Ki Christensen WFi Eatough DJi Henry RCi Kim Ei Laden Fi Lall Ri Larson TVi Neas Li Hopke PKi
Thurston GD. (2006). PM source apportionment and health effects: 2. An investigation of
intermethod variability in associations between source-apportioned fine particle mass and daily
mortality in Washington, DC. , 16: 300-10. 188554
Kodavanti UPi Schladweiler MCi Ledbetter ADi McGee JKi Walsh Li Gilmour PSi Highfill JWi Davies
Di Pinkerton KEi Richards JHi Crissman Ki Andrews Di Costa DL. (2005). Consistent
pulmonary and systemic responses from inhalation of fine concentrated ambient particles: roles
of rat strains used and physicochemical properties. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 1561-1568.
087946
Note: Hyperlinks to the reference citations throughout this document will take you to the NCEA HERO database
(Health and Environmental Research Online) at http://epa. gov/hero. HERO is a database of scientific literature
used by U.S. EPA in the process of developing science assessments such as the Integrated Science Assessments
(ISA) and the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS).
July 2009
F-11
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Laden Fi Neas LMi Dockery DW! Schwartz J. (2000). Association of fine particulate matter from
different sources with daily mortality in six US cities. Environ Health Perspect, 108- 941-947.
012102
Lanki Ti De Hartog JJi Heinrich J; Hoek Gi Janssen NAHi Peters A; Stolzel Mi Timonen KLi Vallius
Mi Vanninen Ei Pekkanen J. (2006). Can we identify sources of fine particles responsible for
exercise-induced ischemia on days with elevated air pollution? The ULTRA study. Environ
Health Perspect, 114- 655-660. 088412
Lipfert FWi Baty JDi Miller JPi Wyzga RE. (2006). PM2.5 constituents and related air quality variables
as predictors of survival in a cohort of U.S. military veterans. Inhal Toxicol, 18- 645-657. 088756
Lippmann Mi Hwang Ji Maclejczyk Pi Chen L. (2005). PM source apportionment for short-term cardiac
function changes in ApoE-/- mice. Environ Health Perspect, 113: 1575-1579. 087453
Lippmann Mi Ito Ki Hwang JSi Maciejczyk Pi Chen LC. (2006). Cardiovascular effects of nickel in
ambient air. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 1662-9. 091165
Maciejczyk Pi Chen LC. (2005). Effects of subchronic exposures to concentrated ambient particles
(CAPs) in mice^ VIII source-related daily variations in in vitro responses to CAPs. Inhal Toxicol,
17: 243-253. 087456
Mar TFi Ito Ki Koenig JQi Larson TVi Eatough DJi Henry RCi Kim Ei Laden Fi Lall Ri Neas Li Stolzel
Mi Paatero Pi Hopke PKi Thurston GD. (2006). PM source apportionment and health effects: 3
Investigation of inter-method variations in associations between estimated source contributions
of PM2.5 and daily mortality in Phoenix, AZ. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, Epidemiol.16: 311-
320. 086143
Mar TFi Norris GAi Koenig JQi Larson TV. (2000). Associations between air pollution and mortality in
Phoenix, 1995-1997. Environ Health Perspect, 108: 347-353. 001760
Nikolov MCi Coull BAi Catalano PJi Diaz Ei Godleski JJ. (2008). Statistical methods to evaluate health
effects associated with major sources of air pollution: a case-study of breathing patterns during
exposure to concentrated Boston air particles. J Roy Stat Soc C Appl Stat, 57: 357-378. 156808
Ostro Bi Feng W"Yi Broadwin Ri Green Si Lipsett M. (2007). The effects of components of fine
particulate air pollution on mortality in California: results from CALFINE. Environ Health
Perspect, 115: 13-9. 091354
Ostro Bi Roth Li Malig Bi Marty M. (2009). The effects of fine particle components on respiratory
hospital admissions in children. Environ Health Perspect, 117: 475. 191971
Peng Ri Bell Mi Geyh Ai McDermott Ai Zeger Si Samet Ji Dominici F. (2009). Emergency admissions
for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases and the chemical composition of fine particle air
pollution. Environ Health Perspect, 117: 957-963. 191998
Penttinen Pi Vallius Mi Tiittanen Pi Ruuskanen Ji Pekkanen J. (2006). Source-specific fine particles in
urban air and respiratory function among adult asthmatics. Inhal Toxicol, 18: 191-198. 087988
Rhoden CRi Lawrence Ji Godleski JJi Gonzalez-Flecha B. (2004). N-acetylcysteine prevents lung
inflammation after short-term inhalation exposure to concentrated ambient particles. Toxicol
Sci, 79: 296-303. 087969
Riediker Mi Devlin RBi Griggs TRi Herbst MCi Bromberg PAi Williams RWi Cascio WE. (2004).
Cardiovascular effects in patrol officers are associated with fine particulate matter from brake
wear and engine emissions. Part Fibre Toxicol, l: 2. 091261
Saldiva PHNi Clarke RWi Coull BAi Stearns RCi Lawrence Ji Krishna-Murthy GGi Diaz Ei Koutrakis
Pi Suh Hi Tsuda Ai Godleski JJ. (2002). Lung inflammation induced by concentrated ambient air
particles is related to particle composition. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 165: 1610-1617. 025988
Sarnat JAi Marmur Ai Klein Mi Kim Ei Russell AGi Sarnat SEi Mulholland JAi Hopke PKi Tolbert PE.
(2008). Fine particle sources and cardiorespiratory morbidity: an application of chemical mass
balance and factor analytical source-apportionment methods. Environ Health Perspect, 116:
459-66. 097972
Schreuder ABi Larson TVi Sheppard Li Claiborn CS. (2006). Ambient woodsmoke and associated
respiratory emergency department visits in Spokane, Washington. Int J Occup Environ Health,
12: 147-53. 097959
Seagrave JCi McDonald JDi Bedrick Ei Edgerton ESi Gigliotti APi Jansen JJi Ke Li Naeher LPi Seilkop
SKi Zheng Mi Mauderley JL. (2006). Lung toxicity of ambient particulate matter from
southeastern US sites with different contributing sources: relationships between composition
and effects. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 1387-93. 091291
Tsai FCi Apte MGi Daisey JM. (2000). An exploratory analysis of the relationship between mortality
and the chemical composition of airborne particulate matter. Inhal Toxicol, 12: 121-135. 006251
July 2009
F-12
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------
Urch B; Brook JR; Wasserstein D; Brook RD; Rajagopalan S> Corey P; Silverman F. (2004). Relative
contributions of PM2.5 chemical constituents to acute arterial vasoconstriction in humans. Inhal
Toxicol, 16: 345-352. 055629
Veranth JM; Moss TA; Chow JC; Labban R; Nichols WE Walton JC; Walton JG; Yost GS. (2006).
Correlation of in vitro cytokine responses with the chemical composition of soil-derived
particulate matter. Environ Health Perspect, 114: 341-349. 087479
Wellenius GA; Coull BA; Godleski JJ; Koutrakis P; Okabe K; Savage ST. (2003). Inhalation of
concentrated ambient air particles exacerbates myocardial ischemia in conscious dogs. Environ
Health Perspect, 111: 402-408. 055691
Yue W; Schneider A; Stolzel M; Ruckerl R; Cyrys J; Pan X; Zareba W; Koenig W', Wichmann HE; Peters
A. (2007). Ambient source-specific particles are associated with prolonged repolarization and
increased levels of inflammation in male coronary artery disease patients. Mutat Res Fund Mol
Mech Mutagen, 621: 50-60. 097968
Zhang Y, Schauer JJ, Shafer MM, Hannigan MP, Dutton SJ. (2008). Source apportionment of in vitro
reactive oxygen species bioassay activity from atmospheric particulate matter. Environ Sci
Technol, 42: 7502-7509. 192008
July 2009
F-13
DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
-------