inn mi 111 ii ii linn linn
11-100000349
EPA-542-R-17-001
Office of Land and Emergency Management
July 2017
Superfund Remedy Report
15th Edition
v>EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Cover Photo Credits:
Top Left and Bottom Right: Before and after photographs of the Atlas Tack Site in
Massachusetts.
Photos Courtesy of Elaine Stanley, EPA Region 1
Top Center: Pump and treat facility at Crossley Farm Site in Hereford Township, Pennsylvania.
Photo Courtesy of EPA Region 3, Site Photo Gallery:
https://cuniulis.epa>g0v/supercpad/cureites/csitirilo.clm.;id-O3O24O2&.m: ed
Top Right: Drill rig in the process of installing monitoring well at the Portland Harbor Site in
Portland, Oregon.
Photo Courtesy of EPA Region 10
Bottom Left: Excavation of coal tar impacted sediments from approximately 9,000 linear feet of
creek channel at the Tennessee Products Site in Chattanooga, Tennessee.
Photo Courtesy of Craig Zeller, RPM, EPA Region 4
Bottom Center: Operation of electrical resistance heating (ERH) and groundwater treatment
system at the Spectron, Inc. Site in Elkton, Maryland. ERH evaporates and steam strips
contaminants, which are extracted, cooled and treated in the groundwater treatment system, and
clean steam is released.
Photo Courtesy of John Epps, RPM, EPA Region 3
JULY 2017
-------
EPA-542-R-17-001
Office of Land and Emergency Management
July 2017
Superfund Remedy Report
15th Edition
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Table of Contents
Notice and Disclaimer iiv
Acronyms and Abbreviations v
Executive Summary ES-1
I. Purpose and Introduction 1
Contents 2
II. Approach 3
III. Scope of this Report 6
IV. Overview of Remedies 8
V. Overview of Contaminants 9
VI. Source Remedies 15
Sediment Remedies 20
VII. Groundwater Remedies 23
VIII. Vapor Intrusion 28
IX. Decision Documents at Federal Facilities 29
X. Combined Remedies 33
XI. Optimization 37
XII. Conclusions 41
XIII. Sources and Electronic Versions 43
Appendix A: Definitions of Selected Remedies A-l
Table of Contents A-l
A. 1 Treatment Technologies A-3
A. 2 On-Site Containment Technologies A-12
A.3 Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA) A-13
A.4 Monitored Natural Recovery (MNR) for Sediment A-13
A.5 Enhanced Monitored Natural Recovery (EMNR) for Sediment A-14
A. 6 Vapor Intrusion Mitigation A-14
A. 7 Other or Unspecified Remedies A-16
Appendix B: Treatment Technologies by Fiscal Year B-l
Appendix C: Remedy Selection Summary Matrix FY 2012-2014 C-l
Appendix D: Individual Contaminants and Assigned Contaminant Groups D-l
Appendix E: Source Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-2014 E-l
Appendix F: Sediment Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-2014 F-l
Appendix G: Groundwater Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-2014 G-l
Appendix H: Vapor Intrusion Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-2014.. H-l
JULY 2017
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Figures
Figure 1: Example Remedial Approach at a Site 2
Figure 2: RODs and ROD Amendments per Year (FY 1981-2014) 7
Figure 3: ESDs per Year (FY 1988-2014) 7
Figure 4: Treatment at Superfund Sites (FY 1982-2014) 8
Figure 5a: COCs at Superfund Sites (FY 1982-2014) 10
Figure 5b: COCs in Decision Documents (FY 1982-2014) 11
Figure 6: COCs by Media at Superfund Sites (FY 1982-2014) 12
Figure 7a: Detailed COCs in Groundwater at Superfund Sites (FY 1982-2014) 13
Figure 7b: Detailed COCs in Soil at Superfund Sites (FY 1982-2014) 14
Figure 7c: Detailed COCs in Sediment at Superfund Sites (FY 1982-2014) 14
Figure 8: Selection Trends for Decision Documents with Source Remedies (FY 1986-2014) 16
Figure 9: Combinations of Recent Source Remedies (FY 2012-2014) 17
Figure 10: Detailed COCs in Decision Documents with Source Remedies (FY 2012-2014) 19
Figure 11: Detailed COCs in Decision Documents with Sediment Remedies (FY 2012-2014) 21
Figure 12: Actions at Tier 1 Sediment Sites 22
Figure 13: Superfund Sites with Groundwater Remedies (FY 1982-2014) 23
Figure 14: Selection Trends for Decision Documents with Groundwater Remedies
(FY 1986-2014) 24
Figure 15: Summary of Remedies Selected with Groundwater P&T at Superfund Sites
(FY 1982-2014) 25
Figure 16: Detailed COCs in Decision Documents with Groundwater Remedies
(FY 2012-2014) 28
Figure 17: Federal Facility RODs and ROD Amendments per Year (FY 1983-2014) 30
Figure 18: Federal Facility ESDs per Year (FY 1993-2014) 30
Figure 19: Detailed COCs in Groundwater at Federal Facilities (FY 1983-2014) 31
Figure 20: Detailed COCs in Soil at Federal Facilities (FY 1983-2014) 31
Figure 21: Select COCs in Groundwater at Federal Facilities (FY 1983-2014) 32
Figure 22: Select COCs in Soil at Federal Facilities (FY 1983-2014) 33
Figure 23: Combined Remedy Highlight - Alameda Naval Air Station 34
Figure 24: Combined Remedy Highlight - Mattiace Petrochemical Co., Inc 35
Figure 25: Combined Remedy Highlight - St. Julien's Creek Annex (U.S. Navy) 36
Figure 26: Combined Remedy Highlight - Williams Air Force Base 37
Figure 27: Optimization Highlight - Hamilton/Labree Roads Groundwater Contamination 39
Figure 28: Optimization Highlight - Kearsarge Metallurgical Corp 40
JULY 2017
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Tables
Table 1: Summary of Remedy Categories 3
Table 2: Media Addressed at Superfund Sites with Remedies (FY 1982-2014) 9
Table 3: Source Remedies Selected in Recent Decision Documents (FY 2012-2014) 18
Table 4: Sediment Remedies Selected in Recent Decision Documents (FY 2012-2014) 20
Table 5: Groundwater Remedies Selected in Recent Decision Documents (FY 2012-2014) 26
Table 6: In Situ Bioremediation and Chemical Treatment Techniques Selected in Recent
Groundwater Decision Documents (FY 2012-2014) 27
Table 7: Vapor Intrusion Remedies Selected in Decision Documents (FY 2009-2014) 29
JULY 2017
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Notice and Disclaimer
Preparation of this report has been funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
under contract number EP-W-14-001 with ICF. This report is not intended, nor can it be relied
upon, to create any rights enforceable by any party in litigation with the United States. Mention of
trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
A portable document format version of Superfund Remedy Report 15th Edition is available for viewing
or downloading from www 1 ' • ;eh/ . . i
JULY 2017
IV
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Acronyms and Abbreviations
ASR Annual Status Report
BTEX Benzene, toluene, ethyl-
benzene, xylenes
CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and
Liability Act
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COC Contaminant of concern
DNAPL Dense non-aqueous phase
liquid
EMNR Enhanced monitored natural
recovery
EPA U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency
ESD Explanation of Significant
Differences
FY Fiscal year
IC Institutional control
IS CO In situ chemical oxidation
ISCR In situ chemical reduction
ISTT In situ thermal treatment
LNAPL Light non-aqueous phase liquid
MNA Monitored natural attenuation
MNR Monitored natural recovery
MPE Multi-phase extraction
NAPL Non-aqueous phase liquid
NCP National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan
NPL National Priorities List
OU Operable unit
P&T Pump and treat
PAH Polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbon
PCB Polychlorinated biphenyl
PRB Permeable reactive barrier
RCRA Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act
ROD Record of Decision
S/S Solidification/stabilization
SRR Superfund Remedy Report
SVE Soil vapor extraction
SVOC Semivolatile organic
compound
VEB Vertical engineered barrier
VOC Volatile organic compound
JULY 2017
V
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Executive Summary
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) prepared the Superfund Remedy Report (SRR) 15th
Edition to provide information and analyses on remedies selected to address contamination at
Superfund sites. The statute authorizing EPA to clean up uncontrolled hazardous waste sites and
spills established a clear preference for remedial actions in which treatment permanently and
significantly reduces the volume, toxicity or mobility of the hazardous substances, pollutants, and
contaminants. Hence, EPA is particularly interested in documenting and disseminating
information on treatment technologies that advance its mission of protecting human health and
the environment at contaminated sites. This report is the latest in a series, prepared since 1991, on
Superfund remedy selection.
The SRR 15th Edition provides historical trends of remedies selected in Superfund decision
documents and more detailed analyses of remedies selected in fiscal years (FYs) 2012, 2013 and
2014. Decision documents include Records of Decision (RODs), ROD Amendments, and
Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) for National Priority List (NPL) and Superfund
Alternative Approach sites. From the inception of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) through FY 2014, EPA has signed 5,197 decision
documents, including 4,086 RODs and ROD Amendments and 1,111 ESDs, for 1,549 Superfund
sites. Data from these documents form the basis for the SRR remedy analysis. The SRR compiles
data on remedies and presents separate analyses for contaminants overall and contaminants in
select media (soil, sediment and groundwater). This edition also includes a separate analysis of
remedy and response action data for large sediment sites.
For the majority (78 percent) of the 1,540 Superfund sites with decision documents available,
treatment has been selected, often in combination with other remedies. Most of these sites have
more than one contaminated media, most frequently groundwater and soil. Most sites also have
different types of contaminants of concern (COCs): more than half of sites address volatile organic
compounds (VOCs), semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs) and metals, while a quarter of sites
address two of these groups.
For FYs 2012 to 2014, remedies were selected in 308 decision documents, including 242 RODs
and ROD Amendments, and 66 ESDs with remedial components. Of the 308 decision
documents, 188 (61 percent) include a remedy for source materials (such as soil and sediment) and
160 (52 percent) for groundwater. Remedies were also selected for soil gas and air related to vapor
intrusion.
For this three-year period, nearly half of decision documents with source remedies include
treatment. A quarter of all source decision documents include in situ treatment. Soil vapor
extraction, chemical treatment, and in situ thermal treatment are the most frequently selected in
situ treatment technologies for sources with soil being the most common source medium
addressed. Physical separation, recycling, and solidification/stabilization (S/S) are the most
common ex situ treatment methods. Metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and
halogenated VOCs are the COCs most commonly addressed.
JULY 2017
ES-I
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Of the 188 recent source decision documents, 39 include a remedy for sediments. Most of the
sediment decision documents (87 percent) include dredging, excavation, off-site disposal or on-site
containment as part of the selected remedy. Some treatment was also selected — for example, in
situ amended caps and ex situ and in situ S/S. Examples of other remedies include wetlands
replacement and enhanced or monitored natural recovery (EMNR or MNR). Two-thirds of the
sediment decision documents include institutional controls (ICs). Metals, PAHs and
polychlorinated biphenyls are the COCs most frequently addressed.
EPA also analyzed newly acquired remedy and response action data on the largest sediment sites,
known as Tier 1 sediment sites. The data include 112 actions for 66 sites. Some of these actions
have progressed to design or implementation. Most remedies for these sites include dredging and
excavation (84 percent), 48 percent include residual caps, and 29 percent include engineered caps
designed to isolate contaminants from the waterway. A quarter of the Tier 1 sites include MNR
and 18 percent include EMNR.
For the 160 groundwater decision documents signed in FYs 2012 to 2014, the groundwater
remedies continue to be primarily a mix of in situ treatment, pump and treat (P&T), and
monitored natural attenuation; most also include ICs. The use of in situ groundwater treatment
continues to rise and is now selected in over half of groundwater decision documents. Of these,
bioremediation and chemical treatment remain the most frequently selected. The majority of in
situ bioremediation remedies specify anaerobic bioremediation, and more than half of chemical
treatment remedies specify in situ chemical oxidation. The selection of P&T in groundwater
decision documents has decreased significantly since the early 1990s and reached its lowest, 17
percent, in FY 2014. Containment technologies (vertical engineered barriers such as slurry walls)
were selected at a few sites. By far, halogenated VOCs (primarily chlorinated VOCs) are the most
common type of groundwater COC, addressed in 72 percent of recent groundwater decision
documents.
In addition, vapor intrusion mitigation was selected for existing structures in nine recent decision
documents, and ICs for either existing structures or future construction in 34. Some ICs restrict
the future use of structures to avoid vapor intrusion exposure and others require the installation of
mitigation systems as part of future construction. Active depressurization is the most common
mitigation method specified followed by passive barriers and sub-slab ventilation systems.
The report also includes an analysis of Superfund decision documents for federal facilities on the
NPL. Since 1983, EPA has signed 1,877 RODs, ROD Amendments and ESDs for these federal
facilities. From FY 2012 to 2014, nearly half of all decision documents were for federal facilities.
The COCs most commonly addressed in groundwater at federal facilities are halogenated VOCs
and metals. Metals and PAHs are most commonly addressed in soil at federal facilities.
Groundwater and soil remedies also address munitions constituents and radioactive materials,
with SVOC munitions and radioactive metals being most frequent.
In this report, EPA also discusses the use of combined remedies and optimization reviews. The
combined remedy highlights provide examples of recent decision documents where remedies were
combined spatially or in sequence. The optimization highlights provide examples of how
optimization efforts have informed remedy selection in recent decision documents.
JULY 2017
ES-2
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
The remedy and site information provided in this report informs stakeholders in Superfund
communities about the program's remedy decisions and helps federal, state and tribal remediation
professionals select remedies. Analyzing the trends in remedy decisions provides an indication of
the future demand for remedial technologies, which helps technology developers and consulting
and engineering firms evaluate cleanup markets. The trends also indicate program needs for
expanded technical information and support related to specific technologies or site cleanup
challenges. For example, growing use of in situ groundwater technologies suggests the need for
additional knowledge and support associated with those technologies.
JULY 2017
ES-3
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
I. Purpose and Introduction
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Office of Superfund Remediation and
Technology Innovation prepared this Superfund Remedy Report (SRR) 15th Edition to share analysis of
remediation technologies selected to address contamination at Superfund sites. EPA is particularly
interested in documenting and disseminating information on treatment technologies to advance
its mission of protecting human health and the environment at contaminated sites. The report
focuses on treatment because the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act (CERCLA) has a statutory preference for treatment.1
The SRR 15th Edition adds remedy information from decision documents issued during fiscal years
(FYs) 2012, 2013 and 2014. The data in this report build on the evaluations in the 12 editions of
Treatment Technologies for Site Cleanup: Annual Status Report (ASR), which covered the timeframe
from FY 1982 through a portion of FY 2005; SRR 13th Edition (FYs 2005 to 2008); and SRR 14th
Edition (FYs 2009 to 2011).
Selected remedial actions for Superfund sites, including National Priority List (NPL) and
Superfund Alterative Approach sites are recorded in a decision document, such as a Record of
Decision (ROD), ROD Amendment or Explanation of Significant Differences (ESD). The
information in this report was extracted from these Superfund decision documents. This report
inventories all remedies selected, however, not all selected remedies are ultimately implemented.
Sometimes changes are made prior to implementation. For example, a different remedy may be
required when a treatment technology that was selected in a ROD based on bench-scale treatability
testing proves ineffective in pilot-scale tests conducted during the design phase. In addition, a
remedial technology may be added to the original remedy if additional contamination is
discovered during remedy implementation or a different approach can more efficiently address
residual contamination. Furthermore, a particular remedy may have been included in a ROD as a
contingent remedy, but subsequent site investigations reveal that implementation is not necessary.
Fundamental changes to remedies selected in a ROD are documented in a ROD Amendment, and
significant changes are documented in an ESD.
A site can be divided into a number of operable units (OUs), which can result in multiple decision
documents. The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP)
defines an OU as "a discrete action that comprises an incremental step toward comprehensively
addressing site problems. This discrete portion of a remedial response manages migration, or
eliminates or mitigates a release, threat of a release, or pathway of exposure. The cleanup of a site
can be divided into a number of OUs, depending on the complexity of the problems associated
with the site. OUs may address geographical portions of a site, specific site problems, or initial
phases of an action, or may consist of any set of actions performed over time or any actions that
are concurrent but located in different parts of a site."2 Figure 1 illustrates an example of a
1 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 and the amendments made by
subsequent enactments (42 U.S.C. 9601-9675).
2 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), title 40, sec 300.5. www,gpo,eov/t - ¦ .i i. 30 l-tifk-40-yo1 .'* >
200 l-tiflc'4
JULY 2017
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
remedial approach at a site with multiple OUs, decision documents, and remedies. In the example,
the site has been divided into three OUs, with two addressing separate sources and two addressing
groundwater. In the example, EPA has issued a ROD and ROD Amendment for the OU1 source
area. The OU 1 ROD Amendment made a fundamental change to the application of the selected
soil vapor extraction (SVE) technology by adding in situ bioremediation and discontinuing pump
and treat (P&T). OU2 has a ROD that addresses groundwater downgradient from OU1 and
OU3. OU3 addresses a separate source area that is still under investigation and does not yet have a
decision document.
Figure I: Example Remedial Approach at a Site
ROD #1
In situ soil vapor extraction
for soil and pump and treat-
for groundwater
ROD Amendment #1
Adds in situ bioremediation
and discontinues pump
and treat
: Disposal Area ^
(Soil and Groundwater)
0U2: Downgradient
Groundwater
No ROD
ROD #2
Monitored natural
attenuation and
institutional controls
for groundwater
Contents
The SRR 15th Edition includes 13 sections and 8 appendices.
¦ Section I discusses the purpose and introduces the report.
¦ Section II describes the approach used to collect and analyze data.
¦ Section III describes the scope of the report.
¦ Section IV analyzes types of remedies and media addressed at Superfund sites.
¦ Section V analyzes contaminants included in decision documents.
¦ Section VI discusses source remedies, including a breakout of sediment remedies.
¦ Section VII discusses groundwater remedies.
¦ Section VIII discusses vapor intrusion remedies.
¦ Section IX provides a breakout of decision documents at federal facilities.
¦ Section X discusses combined remedies and provides four examples.
¦ Section XI discusses optimization and includes two examples.
¦ Section XII presents conclusions.
¦ Section XIII lists the data sources and provides information on how to access the electronic
version of this and previous editions of SRR.
JULY 2017
2
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
II. Approach
EPA used data from decision documents available as of November 2015 to compile information
about remedy selection for all years with a focus on the most recent three years (FYs 2012, 2013 and
2014). The data used include remedies selected in decision documents (RODs, ROD Amendments
and select ESDs). Only ESDs with additions or changes to remedy components were included in the
analyses. ESDs were not included if they did not change a remedy component but instead addressed
another aspect of the remedy, such as quantity of material to be addressed, contaminants of concern
(COC), cost information, or monitoring requirements. EPA has updated the dataset to add remedy
components for decision documents from the early years of the program that had not previously
been recorded and has updated older data to conform more readily to recently updated media and
remedy categories. For example, any non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) remedies previously captured
under the "other" medium were moved to the newly established NAPL medium. In addition, some
remedy names were changed to be consistent with recent terminology. Therefore, some counts
presented in this edition may vary from previous editions.
The SRR remedy analysis distinguishes between remediation of contaminated source materials and
non-source materials such as groundwater. EPA defines "source material" as "material that
includes or contains hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants that act as a reservoir for
migration of contamination to ground water to surface water, to air, or acts as a source for direct
exposure." This includes contaminated soil, sludge, sediment, solid waste, debris, drummed waste,
leachate and any non-aqueous phase liquid both light (LNAPL) and dense (DNAPL) (EPA, 1991a).
Groundwater is considered "non-source material" (EPA, 1991a).
The report groups remedies into major categories, indicated by the green bars in Table 1. It
discusses remedies as related to source, groundwater or vapor intrusion based on the media
addressed. Appendix A provides definitions of all categories and corresponding remedy types
under each category.
Table I: Summary of Remedy Categories
Source Control
Treatment
• Chemical, biological or physical means to reduce toxicity, mobility or volume of contaminated source media
• Can be either in situ or ex situ
• Examples include chemical treatment and in situ thermal treatment
On-site Containment
• Examples include the use of caps, liners, covers, and landfilling on site
Off-site Disposal
• Includes excavation and disposal at an off-site facility
Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA)
• Reliance on natural processes3
• Natural recovery processes may include physical, chemical, and biological processes
3 For further information about MNA, refer to Use of Monitored Natural Attenuation at Superfund, RCRA
Corrective Action, and Underground Storage Tank Sites. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. April 21,
1999. OSWER Directive No. 9200.4-17P. https://semspub.epa.gov/work/HQ/159152.pdf
JULY 2017
3
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Source Control
Monitored Natural Recovery (MNR)
• Reliance on natural processes to reduce risk from sediments
• Natural recovery processes may include physical, chemical, and biological processes
Enhanced Monitored Natural Recovery (EMNR)
• Combines natural recovery with an engineered approach for sediments
• Typically includes placing a thin layer of clean sediment to accelerate the recovery process
Institutional Controls
• Non-engineered instruments, such as administrative and legal controls, that help minimize the potential for
human exposure to contamination and protect the integrity of the remedy
• Examples for source media include land use restrictions and access agreements
Other
• Source control remedies that do not fall into the categories of source control treatment, on-site containment,
off-site disposal, MNA, MNR, EMNR, or institutional controls
• Examples include wetlands replacement and shoreline stabilization
Groundwater
In Situ Treatment
Pump and Treat (P&T)
Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA)
Containment
Containment of groundwater using a vertical, engineered, subsurface, impermeable barrier
Examples for groundwater include drilling restrictions and water supply use restrictions
Examples include installing new water supply wells, providing bottled water or extending a municipal water supply
Other
Institutional Controls
Alternative Water Supply
Treatment of groundwater in place without extraction from an aquifer
Examples include in situ chemical oxidation and in situ bioremediation
Pumping of groundwater from a well or trench, followed by aboveground treatment
Examples of aboveground treatment include air stripping and granular activated carbon
Reliance on natural attenuation processes4
Natural attenuation processes may include physical, chemical, and biological processes
Groundwater remedies that do not fall into the categories of in situ treatment, P&T, MNA, containment,
institutional controls, or alternative water supply
Examples include drainage/erosion control and wetlands restoration
Vapor Intrusion
Mitigation
• Mitigation of soil gas or indoor air to reduce exposure to vapor contamination in buildings
• Examples include active depressurization technologies and passive barriers
Institutional Controls
• Examples for vapor intrusion include land use restrictions and vapor intrusion mitigation for new buildings
This report includes remedies selected in the Superfund remedial program, including treatment,
containment and remedial components such as institutional controls (ICs); treatment technologies
are discussed in more detail. "Treatment technology means any unit operation or series of unit
4 Ibid.
JULY 2017
4
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
operations that alters the composition of a hazardous substance or pollutant or contaminant
through chemical, biological or physical means so as to reduce toxicity, mobility or volume of the
contaminated materials being treated."5
In the analysis conducted for SRR, monitoring is not included separately as a remedy. According
to EPA guidance, "[a]n alternative may include monitoring only and still be considered 'no
action.'" (EPA, 1999a). Thus monitoring is not considered itself a remedy. However, the
Superfund program recognizes the importance of effective monitoring and has implemented a
long-term monitoring optimization strategy.6
The report presents data in figures at the decision document-level or at the site-level, depending on
the objective of the figure. For some figures, decision documents that selected multiple remedies
are counted in each remedy category, as appropriate. For example, a single decision document that
selected both in situ treatment and a cap is listed in both remedy categories. For other figures, a
hierarchy is used to classify a decision document into a single category of remedy types. This
hierarchy has been established to represent the data consistent with the CERCLA statutory
preference for treatment. Notes on individual figures and tables indicate whether a hierarchy was
used. Additionally, some figures present historical or cumulative data, and others focus on recent
remedy selection.
5 CFR, title 40, sec 300.5. www.gpo.gtn/fdsvs/ i _ l»titlc40A-ol24-m.T3(X^-5.pdf
6 For farther information, please visit the Cleanup Optimization at Superfund Sites web page at
www.epa.an'/superfund/clcanumwHmiatfio
JULY 2017
5
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
III. Scope of this Report
This report discusses decision documents for current and deleted NPL sites that had at least one
decision document as of the end of FY 2014. For the first time, the SRR analysis includes 45
decision documents for 41 Superfund Alternative Approach sites (as of May 2016).7 The current
analysis does not include decision documents for other non-NPL sites or sites that are proposed
for the NPL.
There are 1,549 sites that have at least one decision
document. The decision documents issued for these sites
form the basis for the SRR and its analyses. A total of 5,197
decision documents, including 4,086 RODs and ROD
Amendments, and 1,111 ESDs have been signed at those
1,549 sites. Eighty-four decision documents were not
available; nine sites had no decision documents available.
As discussed previously, most sites have multiple decision
documents. Figure 2 depicts the number of RODs and
ROD Amendments issued each year through FY 2014.
Figure 3 shows the number of ESDs annually and identifies
the number with changes to remedy components. Only
ESDs with a remedy component were included in the
remedy analysis. The first ESD was signed in 1988.
This report evaluates remedy selection trends historically and cumulatively through FY 2014. It
also provides a more detailed analysis of the 308 decision documents signed at 212 sites in FYs
2012, 2013, and 2014. These documents include 242 RODs and ROD Amendments, and 66
ESDs with changes to remedy components. More than half of the decision documents from FY
2012 to 2014 are for federal facilities (see Section IX).
New in the 15th Edition
¦
Superfund Alternative
Approach sites
¦
Contaminant analysis
¦
Tier 1 sediment analysis
¦
Decision documents at
federal facilities
¦
Combined remedies
¦
Optimization
7 "One of EPA's non-NPL Superfund pathways is referred to as the Superfund Alternative (SA) approach. The SA
approach uses the same process and standards for investigation and cleanup as sites on the NPL. Sites using the SA
approach are not eligible for federal remedial cleanup funds. Cleanup funding for sites with SA agreements is
provided by the potentially responsible parties (PRPs)." (EPA, 2008b). To be considered an official Superfund
Alternative Approach site, there needs to be a Superfund Alternative Approach agreement per OECA policy (see:
www.epa.gov/enforcement/superfund-alternative-approach). The list of sites with a Superfund Alternative Approach
agreement is as of May 18, 2016.
JULY 2017
6
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Figure 2: RODs and ROD Amendments per Year (FY 1981-2014)
T3
C
01
£
<
Q
o
CC
-a
Q
o
a:
225
200
175
150
125
100
75
50
25
ss RODs and ROD Amendments Not Available - 34
¦ RODs and ROD Amendments - 4,052
14 45
HNfO'tiflONOOOOHNfn'tiniDNOOai
M03MMCOMCOMCOiJl(JlChCiaiai(JiailJl(Ji
OHiNrn^miDNCoaiOHiMfCi
OOOOOOOOOOr—IrHrHr—I
oooooooooooooo
(N(N(N(N(N(N(N(N(N(N(N(N(N(N
Total number of RODs and ROD Amendments = 4,086.
O
1/1
O)
_Q
E
3
Figure 3: ESDs per Year (FY 1988-2014)
70
60
21
50
23
21
21
40
31
16
29
20
25
10
18
19
22
22
23
25
25
25
24
26
28
29
30
30
31
31
32
32
33
37
41
N ESDs Not Available - 50
¦ ESDs with No Remedial Components - 411
¦ ESDs with Remedial Components - 650
00
CO
o
cn
LH
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
IV. Overview of Remedies
Of the 1,549 sites with decision documents as of the end of FY 2014, remedies were selected at
1,447 sites and no action or no further action was specified at 93 sites. Figure 4 focuses on
treatment remedies and shows the proportion of Superfund remedies by remedy category
(including source and groundwater remedies). Sites are included once using the following
hierarchy: treatment, on-site containment or off-site disposal, other non-treatment remedies
(including institutional controls, MNA, MNR, and alternative water supply) and no action or no
further action. At least one treatment remedy was selected for source, groundwater, or both at 7 8
percent ol Superfund sites. Appendix B lists the type and number of source and groundwater
treatment technologies selected by fiscal year. Appendix C summarizes all remedies selected in FY
2012, 2013, and 2014 decision documents.
Figure 4: Treatment at Superfund Sites (FY 1982-2014)
No Action or No Further Action
Only, 9
Containment, ICs, MNA or Alternative
Water Supply for Groundwater, 37,2%
ICs, MNA or MNR
for a Source ¦— M
24, 2%
Non-Treatment,
No Action or
No Further Action - 344
22%
A°°m
o o o
\n O O ^
^NO o o
Treatment of
Source, 275,18%
On-site Containment or Off-site
Disposal of a Source,
190,12%
Treatment of
Groundwater,
272,18%
Treatment -
78%
1,196
Treatment of Both
Source and Groundwater,
649,42%
Sites with remedies, no action or no further action = 1,540. Sites with no decision document available = 9.
Sites are counted in this figure using the following hierarchy: (I) treatment, (2) on-site containment or off-site disposal of a
source, (3) other non-treatment remedies of a source, (4) containment or non-treatment remedies for groundwater, and
(5) no action or no further action only.
Sites with treatment remedies include in situ or ex situ treatment and may also include non-treatment remedies.
Sites with only non-treatment remedies do not include treatment remedies in any decision document.
Sites with only no action or no further action (93) do not have treatment or non-treatment remedies selected in any
decision document.
JULY 2017
8
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
EPA analyzed which types of media remedies target at Superfund sites (Table 2). Groundwater is
addressed most frequently, followed by soil. Remedies also frequently target sediments and solid
waste. In this analysis, all media addressed within decision documents for the site are counted
once for each medium even if it was targeted at multiple OUs or in multiple decision documents.
NAPL is considered a source medium when it contributes to groundwater contamination.
However, EPA does not have complete data on its presence at Superfund sites. NAPL is often
difficult to locate during a site investigation, and there may not be direct evidence of its presence
at the time EPA signs a decision document. In addition, EPA has only recently tracked NAPL as a
separate medium when reviewing remedy decisions. For these reasons, NAPL is not included in
Table 2.
Table 2: Media Addressed at Superfund Sites with Remedies (FY 1982-2014)
Media
Number of Sites
Percentage of Sites
Source Media
1,293
89%
Soil
1,175
81%
Sediment
435
30%
Solid waste
427
30%
Debris
218
15%
Buildings and structures
159
11%
Sludge
144
10%
Leachate
126
9%
Liquid waste
115
8%
Groundwater
1,218
84%
• Total number of sites with remedies: 1,447.
• Table 2 does not include NAPL, or soil gas and air media addressed by vapor intrusion technologies.
V. Overview of Contaminants
Decision documents typically identify COCs addressed by selected remedies. EPA evaluated the
types of COCs at Superfund sites based on decision documents with remedies and COCs (1,402
sites). COC data were unavailable for 45 (approximately 3 percent) of sites with remedies. The
contaminants may be in the same media, or in different media, and may be addressed by the same
or different remedies.
For this report, contaminants are categorized in three major groups based on general treatability:
volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs) and metals. Any
contaminant that does not fit into one of those groups is categorized as "other."
JULY 2017
9
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
The contaminant groups are defined below:
¦ Metals - Metals; metalloids; explosive metals; radioactive metals; and organometallic
pesticides and herbicides.
¦ VOCs - Halogenated VOCs (primarily chlorinated VOCs); benzene, toluene,
ethylbenzene, xylene (BTEX); and other nonhalogenated VOCs.
¦ SVOCs - Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs); polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs);
organic pesticides and herbicides; phenols; most fuels and distillates; most explosives;
dioxins and furans; and other halogenated and nonhalogenated SVOCs.
¦ Other - nonmetallic inorganics; asbestos; and unspecified organics or inorganics.
Contaminants are further grouped into more detailed categories. Appendix D lists contaminants
and their associated categories.
Over half of sites have COCs in all three groups: VOCs, SVOCs and metals (Figure 5a). Another
23 percent of sites have two types of contaminants, and 24 percent have one type. In Figures 5a
and 5b, any of the groups shown may include "other" contaminants.
5 400
_o
I 300
100
Figure 5a: COCs at Superfund Sites (FY 1982-2014)
800
700
Number of Sites
600
Metals:
1,101(79%)
VOCs:
1,100(78%)
OJ
500
SVOCs:
988 (70%)
l/l
'—
o
Other:
394 (28%)
46
ft®
n|Oc
<3*
<*•
slOc
*aV>
lOc
c^OC
98
jOc
53%
737
24%
23%
1 1
1 149
139
1 In?
in7
<1%
9
lO^
&
cjfr'
&
\\S
Number of sites with a COC and a remedy = 1,402.
JULY 2017
10
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
EPA also conducted the contaminant group analysis based on individual decision documents with
remedies and COCs, which often include a single OU and medium at a site (Figure 5b). This
analysis may be more indicative of contaminants that occur together in the same medium. A larger
percentage of decision documents include one or two groups of contaminants and a lower
percentage have all three. The number of decision documents with COCs is less than the total
number of decision documents, principally because COCs are not included for ROD
Amendments and ESDs unless the COCs change from earlier decision documents.
Figure 5b: COCs in Decision Documents (FY 1982-2014)
1200
1000
800
C
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
EPA analyzed COCs by the three media most frequently targeted (groundwater, soil and sediment)
(Figure 6). On a site-wide basis, VOCs, metals and SVOCs are all common in groundwater and
soil at Superfund sites with remedies. Metals and SVOCs are the most common COCs in
sediment.
Figure 6: COCs by Media at Superfund Sites (FY 1982-2014)
100%
90% 86%
Groundwater
Sediment
¦ VOCs ¦ Metals ¦ SVOCs ¦ Other
• Number of groundwater sites with a COC and a remedy = 1, 125.
• Number of soil sites with a COC and a remedy = 1,056.
• Number of sediment sites with a COC and a remedy = 357.
JULY 2017
12
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
In addition to the contaminant groups discussed previously, EPA classified contaminants into
more detailed categories and analyzed how frequently remedies target them in groundwater, soil,
and sediment (Figures 7a, 7b and 7c). Remedies frequently address metals in all media. A more
detailed look at organic COCs shows halogenated VOCs (primarily chlorinated VOCs) and BTEX
to be the most common in groundwater (Figure 7a); and halogenated VOCs and PAHs in soil
(Figure 7b). For sediment, PAHs and PCBs are the most frequently targeted organics (Figure 7c).
Figure 7a: Detailed COCs in Groundwater at Superfund Sites (FY 1982-2014)
90%
„ 80%
CD
" 70%
i—
(1)
| 60%
"O
I 50%
o
I3
30%
27%
4?
&
rfS
J?
/
Jf
&
\°
&
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Figure 7b: Detailed COCs in Soil at Superfund Sites (FY 1982-2014)
90%
30% 75%
oo 40%
rc
c
CD
E
TD
c
<3?
(V
23% 22%
J?
CO
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
VI. Source Remedies
Source media include soil, sediment, solid waste, debris, buildings and structures, sludge, leachate,
liquid waste, and NAPL (Table 2). The first figure in this section shows historical trends in source
remedies. Subsequent figures and tables provide additional information on remedies used to
address sources in recent decision documents. Descriptions of source remedies are included in
Appendix A. Appendix E lists the decision documents selecting source remedies in FYs 2012,
2013 and 2014 by technology. Sediments are included in the analysis of source remedies and are
discussed in more detail in the Sediment subsection.
To better understand the nature of the source remedies being selected in the Superfund program,
the source remedies are grouped into the following categories. See Table 1 for more detail on each
category:
¦ Treatment.
¦ On-site containment.
¦ Off-site disposal.
¦ Monitored natural attenuation (MNA) and enhanced or monitored natural recovery
(EMNR or MNR).
¦ Institutional Controls.
EPA has tracked use of these source remedies since EPA began issuing remedy decision documents
(FY 1981). EPA evaluated remedy selection trends from FY 1986 to 2014 for 2,944 source decision
documents with remedies (Figure 8). In addition to those indicated in the chart, there are 101
source decision documents for FYs 1982 to 1985. The selection of treatment, on-site containment,
and off-site disposal has remained relatively stable on average for source remedies over the last 20
years. IC remedies increased somewhat in the early 2000s before leveling off.
JULY 2017
15
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Figure 8: Selection Trends for Decision Documents with Source Remedies
(FY 1986-2014)
90%
\ s; * V
¦© —d
B, 2% 3% 3%
iDr^ooCTiOiH(Nrrj"^LniDr^-oociiOiH(Nfir)"^LniDr^-oociiOt-
ooooociociaiaiaiaiaiaiaiaiaiaiooooooooooiHiHiHi-iiH
CTiaiCTlCTlCTlCTlCTlCTlCTlCTlCTlCTlCTlCTlOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
—A- —Treatment —•—On-site Containment —• Off-site Disposal
— •© — Institutional Controls ....q... MNA/MNR/EMNR
• Number of source decision documents with remedies: FY 1986-2014 = 2,944; FY 1982-2014 = 3,045.
• Decision documents may be counted in more than one category.
For this report, EPA evaluated remedies in more detail for the 308 FY 2012, 2013, and 2014
decision documents. Of these documents, 188 (or 61 percent) address source contamination at
140 sites. The percentage of decision documents addressing sources is consistent with the
previous period evaluated (FYs 2009 to 2011).
Of the FY 2012 to 2014 source decision documents, nearly half select source treatment, either by
itself or in combination with non-treatment remedies for sources (Figure 9). Overall, 64 percent
of decision documents with source remedies select multiple remedial approaches, including various
combinations of treatment, on-site containment or off-site disposal, MNR or EMNR (for
sediments), and ICs. An examination of the recent decision documents selecting ICs as the only
source remedy found that all were for sites with previous remedial or removal actions. This finding
is consistent with the NOP, which includes the expectation that ICs should be used to
supplement engineering controls to prevent or limit exposure (EPA, 2012n).
On-site source containment primarily includes caps and cover systems. Although some waste sent
for off-site disposal is treated prior to disposal in accordance with waste disposal regulations, if the
treatment is not specified in the decision document, it is not included as treatment in this analysis.
JULY 2017
16
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Figure 9: Combinations of Recent Source Remedies (FY 2012-2014)
Non-Treatment
54%
Source On-site
Containment or Off-site
Disposal, ICs and MNR or
EMNR, 2,1%
Source On-site
Containment or Off-site
Disposal and ICs, 46,24%
Source Treatment Only,
14,7%
/ °
° / y
°o//
Source Treatment and ICs,
5,3%
Source Treatment and
On-site Containment or
Off-site Disposal, 18,10%
Source On-site Containment or
Off-site Disposal Only,
15,8%
Source ICs and MNR or EMNR,
1, <1%
Source ICs Only,
37, 20%
Source MNR or EMNR Only,
1, <1%
Source Treatment,
On-site Containment or
Off-site Disposal, and ICs,
48,26%
Source Treatment,
On-site Containment or
Off-site Disposal, ICs and
MNR or EMNR, 1, <1%
• Treatment
46%
Number of source decision documents = 188.
Table 3 summarizes the specific types o£ remedies selected in source decision documents for FYs
2012, 2013 and 2014. In situ treatment was selected in nearly one-quarter of these documents. Of
the 86 decision documents with source treatment, 44 (or 51 percent) specified in situ treatment.
The most frequently selected in situ methods for sources are SVE, chemical treatment (including
in situ chemical oxidation [ISCO] and in situ chemical reduction [ISCR]), in situ thermal
treatment (IS I I ), bioremediation, and solidification and stabilization (S/S).
JULY 2017
17
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Table 3: Source Remedies Selected in Recent Decision Documents (FY 2012-2014)
Technology
Total
Percent Source Decision
(FY12-14)
Documents
In Situ Treatment
44
23%
Soil vapor extraction
14
7%
Chemical treatment
12
6%
Thermal treatment
10
5%
Bioremediation
7
4%
Solidification/stabilization
7
4%
Cap (amended, in situ)
3
2%
Soil amendments
2
1%
Fracturing
1
1%
Multi-phase extraction
1
1%
Phytoremediation
1
1%
Ex Situ Treatment
55
29%
Physical separation
27
14%
Recycling
12
6%
Solidification/stabilization
5
3%
Thermal treatment
4
2%
Chemical treatment
3
2%
Source P&T (leachate)
3
2%
Bioremediation
1
1%
Constructed treatment wetland
1
1%
Soil vapor extraction
1
1%
Unspecified ex situ treatment (off-site)
7
4%
Unspecified ex situ treatment (on-site)
6
3%
Containment or Disposal
131
70%
Off-site disposal
86
46%
On-site containment
80
43%
Drainage and erosion control
34
18%
Vertical engineered barrier
8
4%
MNR or EMNR
5
3%
Sediment MNR
3
2%
Sediment EMNR
2
1%
Institutional Controls
140
74%
Other
29
15%
Fencing and signs
15
8%
Wetlands restoration
8
4%
Revegetation
5
3%
Wetlands replacement
4
2%
Shoreline stabilization
3
2%
Habitat restoration
1
1%
Stream realignment
1
1%
• Number of source decision documents = 188.
• Number of source decision documents with treatment = 86.
• Decision documents with multiple remedies within a category are counted once per category, and documents
may be included in more than one remedy category.
• For unspecified on-site or off-site treatment, decision document indicates on- or off-site treatment but does not
specify a particular treatment technology.
• On-site containment remedies primarily include caps and cover systems.
JULY 2017
18
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Physical separation is the most commonly selected ex situ treatment. For purposes of this report,
all types of physical separation are considered treatment because they reduce the volume of
contaminated material. Physical treatment processes include sifting, sieving and sorting solid
media to separate components, dewatering and decontamination (for example, cleaning
contaminated building surfaces). Of the 27 recent decision documents that selected physical
separation, 14 selected dewatering, 8 decontamination, and 6 other physical separation processes,
such as oil/water separation, sieving and mechanical sorting. One document specified both
decontamination and radiological screening and separation.
Notably, ex situ S/S was selected in five recent source decision documents, down from 15 decision
documents in FYs 2009, 2010 and 2011. Ex situ S/S as a percentage of source treatment dropped
to 6 percent of source treatment (5 of 86) selected over the past 3 years, down from 13 percent
during the previous 3-year period (FYs 2009 to 2011).
"Wetlands replacement" refers to wetlands constructed to compensate for wetlands lost by adverse
impacts of a remedy (such as placement of a cap in a wetland or other habitat area). Rehabilitation
of a contaminated wetland is referred to as "wetlands restoration."
Figure 10 shows the top COCs targeted by source remedies in FY 2012 to 2014 decision
documents. Nearly three-quarters of these documents address metals, almost half address PAHs,
and almost half address halogenated VOCs.
Figure 10: Detailed COCs in Decision Documents with Source Remedies
(FY 2012-2014)
£ 80% 73%
Q 60%
c
• Number of source decision documents with a COC and a remedy = 152.
JULY 2017
19
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Sediment Remedies
Fifty-two source decision documents for FYs 2012, 2013, and 2014 address sediment (Table 4). Of
those, 39 selected a remedy for sediments (for 35 sites) and 13 specified no action or no further
action. Appendix A includes descriptions of sediment remedies, and Appendix F lists the decision
documents selecting sediment remedies by technology. Most (87 percent) include dredging,
containment, or disposal, and 49 percent include treatment. The most common treatment method
is physical separation (31 percent); as discussed previously, this report classifies any technology that
reduces toxicity, mobility or volume as treatment. Other sediment treatment selected includes
amended caps and ex situ S/S. The ex situ S/S remedies immobilize contaminants in the sediment
prior to disposal. Two-thirds of decision documents for sediments also include ICs.
Table 4: Sediment Remedies Selected in Recent Decision Documents
(FY 2012-2014)
Remedy
Total
Percent Sediment
(FY12-14)
Decision Documents
Treatment
19
49%
Physical separation (ex situ)
12
31%
Cap (amended, in situ)
3
8%
Solidification/stabilization (ex situ)
2
5%
Bioremediation (in situ)
1
3%
Chemical treatment (ex situ)
1
3%
Incineration (off-site)
1
3%
Neutralization (ex situ)
1
3%
Recycling (ex situ)
1
3%
Solidification/stabilization (in situ)
1
3%
Thermal desorption (ex situ)
1
3%
Thermal treatment (in situ)
1
3%
Unspecified ex situ treatment (off-site)
1
3%
Dredging, Disposal, and Containment
34
87%
Dredging or excavation
31
79%
Off-site disposal
24
62%
Capping (in situ)
8
21%
Capping (ex situ)
6
15%
Containment cell (upland, adjacent)
3
8%
Containment cell (subaqueous)
1
3%
Enhanced Monitored Natural Recovery
2
5%
Monitored Natural Recovery
3
8%
Institutional Controls
26
67%
Other
16
41%
Wetlands restoration
6
15%
Revegetation
5
13%
Fencing and signs
3
8%
Shoreline stabilization
3
8%
Wetlands replacement
3
8%
Habitat restoration
1
3%
Stream realignment
1
3%
• Number of decision documents with a sediment remedy = 39 (Does not include 13 decision documents
specifying no action or no further action)
• Decision documents with multiple remedies within a category are counted once per category, and documents
may be included in more than one remedy category.
JULY 2017
20
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
EPA analyzed COCs addressed by sediment remedies in recent decision documents (Figure 11).
Over three-quarters of these documents include metals. PCBs and PAHs are the next most
frequent categories of COCs with 44 percent each.
Figure 11: Detailed COCs in Decision Documents with Sediment Remedies
(FY 2012-2014)
00
¦>!-'
c
<1)
80%
E
d
u
70%
o
o
c
_o
60%
"o
<1)
50%
Q
c
<1)
40%
E
¦O
<1)
30%
CF
o^v
Number of sediment decision documents with a COC and a remedy = 39.
JULY 2017
21
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Tier 1 Sediment Sites
EPA analyzed newly acquired data on the largest sediment sites, known as Tier 1 sediment sites. EPA defines
Tier 1 sites as those "[w]here the sediment action(s) for the entire site will address more than 10,000 cubic yards
or five acres of contaminated sediment..." (EPA, 2002). Most are NPL sites, although a few are Superfund
Alternative Approach or Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) corrective action sites.
EPA compiled remedy data for 66 Tier 1 sites.8 The data were based not only on the selection of remedies
but also design or implementation of actions, if available. For purposes of this report, data were reorganized
into 112 separate actions. Figure 12 shows the 112 actions selected or implemented at 66 sites on the Tier 1
list.
EPA distinguishes between residual caps and engineered caps on the Tier 1 list. Residual caps refer to a thin
layer of clean material placed in dredged areas where it mixes with remaining sediment and further reduces
risk from contamination left after dredging (EPA, 2005). Engineered caps are designed to isolate the
contaminated material from the waterway. Any dredging associated with engineered caps is typically done to
make room for the cap. The majority of Tier 1 sites (84 percent) have some dredging or excavation of
sediment. Nearly half of the Tier 1 sites have residual caps and nearly one-third of the sites have engineered
caps.
Figure 12: Actions at Tier I Sediment Sites
100%
Total number of Tier I sites = 66; number of Tier I actions =112.
Other actions include stream realignment, ex situ sediment washing, sediment traps, and use of sediment holding tanks.
8 Additional information about Tier 1 sediment sites is available at www.epa.gov/superfund/superfund-contaminated-
sediments-list-sediments-sites. Accessed January 2016.
JULY 2017
22
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
VII. Groundwater Remedies
Groundwater contamination occurs at most Superfund sites- Of the 1,447 Superfund sites with
remedies, 84 percent (1,218 sites) have groundwater remedies (Figure 13), which are documented
in 2,425 decision documents. The figures and tables in this section present additional information
on groundwater remedies and trends. Descriptions of groundwater remedies are included in
Appendix A. Appendix G lists the decision documents selecting groundwater remedies from FY
2012 to 2014 by technology.
Figure 13: Superfund Sites with Groundwater Remedies (FY 1982-2014)
Sites with No
Groundwater Remedy,
229,16%
Sites with a Groundwater Remedy,
1,218,84%
• Number of Superfund sites with a remedy = 1,447.
• Does not include 93 sites with only no action or no further action.
JULY 2017
23
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Figure 14 shows the selection trends for groundwater remedies in 2,357 decision documents from
FY 1986 to 2014. In addition to those indicated in the chart, there are 68 groundwater decision
documents for FYs 1982 to 1985. The most apparent trends are the continued increase in the
selection of in situ groundwater treatment and decrease in the selection of P&T. In situ treatment
has increased significantly; in the most recent three years, the overall percentage rose to 51
percent, up from 39 percent in the last three-year period (FYs 2009 to 2011). The percentage of
groundwater decision documents selecting P&T was at its lowest, 17 percent, in FY 2014. Almost
all recent groundwater decision documents include ICs9. Although there is an apparent decrease
in IC selection in FY 2013, EPA determined that for the FY 2013 groundwater decision
documents that did not include ICs, the corresponding OU had ICs for the groundwater selected
in a previous decision document.
Figure 14: Selection Trends for Decision Documents with Groundwater Remedies
(FY 1986-2014)
2 100%
c
0)
iDi^-oo
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Since 1982, groundwater P&T was selected in at least one decision document at 834 Superfund
sites. Figure 15 shows the mix of remedial approaches selected at these sites. Most sites (91
percent) are also addressing contamination with another groundwater remedy (in situ groundwater
treatment or MNA) or source remedy (treatment, on-site containment, or off-site disposal).
Remedies may apply to the same area or different areas of the site.
Figure 15: Summary of Remedies Selected with Groundwater P&T at Superfund
Sites (FY 1982-2014)
P&T with Treatment,
On-site Containment
or Off-site Disposal
of a Source - 716
86%
Jm
P&T and In Situ Treatment for
Groundwater, 19,2%
I _
P&T and MNA for
Groundwater, 18,2%
P&T and
Source
Treatment, 81
^ 10%
P&T and Source
On-site Containment or
k Off-site Disposal,
\ 129,15% /
' P&T only for
Groundwater, 74,9%
P&T, Source Treatment
and On-site Containment or
Off-site Disposal,
507,61%
P&T, In Situ Treatment
and MNA for Groundwater,
7,1%
P&T with no Treatment,
' On-site Containment or
Off-site Disposal of a
Source -118
14%
Total number of P&T sites = 834.
JULY 2017
25
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
EPA evaluated groundwater remedies selected in 308 FY 2012 to 2014 decision documents. Of these,
about half (160 documents) address groundwater contamination and a third (106) select groundwater
treatment (Table 5). Of the 81 groundwater decision documents that select in situ treatment, over
half include bioremediation and nearly half include chemical treatment. One-third of recent
decision documents select MNA.
Table 5: Groundwater Remedies Selected in Recent Decision Documents
(FY 2012-2014)
Remedy
Total
Percent Groundwater
(FY12-14)
Decision Documents
Ex Situ Treatment (P&T)
37
23%
In Situ Treatment
81
51%
Bioremediation
46
29%
Chemical treatment
37
23%
Permeable reactive barrier
7
4%
Air sparging
5
3%
Thermal treatment
4
3%
Fracturing
3
2%
In-well air stripping
2
1%
Multi-phase extraction
2
1%
Phytoremediation
2
1%
Flushing
1
1%
Unspecified in situ treatment
3
2%
Monitored Natural Attenuation
53
33%
Containment (Vertical Engineered Barrier)
5
3%
Constructed Treatment Wetland
2
1%
Institutional Controls
126
79%
Alternative Water Supply
10
6%
Other
8
5%
Containment (other)
3
2%
Fencing and signs
2
1%
Phytoremediation (for hydraulic control)
2
1%
Leachate control
1
1%
Wetlands restoration
1
1%
• Number of groundwater decision documents = 160.
• Number of groundwater decision documents with treatment = 106.
• Decision documents with multiple remedies within a category are counted once per category, and documents
may be included in more than one remedy category.
• Containment (other) includes containment (unspecified) (2) and bottom liner to prevent groundwater discharge
to surface water (I).
More than half of decision documents that selected bioremediation remedies specify anaerobic
bioremediation (Table 6). Aerobic bioremediation and bioaugmentation (addition of bacteria
capable of degrading specific chemicals) are also specified in some bioremediation remedies. More
JULY 2017
26
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
than half of decision documents that selected chemical treatment specify ISCO, while more than a
quarter select ISCR. Appendix A includes descriptions of bioremediation and chemical treatment
remedies.
Table 6: In Situ Bioremediation and Chemical Treatment Techniques Selected in
Recent Groundwater Decision Documents (FY 2012-2014)
Technology
2 (
)12
2
¦
14
Tt
)tal
Bioremediation
]
L3
6
L
16
Anaerobic bioremediation
8
10
11
29
Bioremediation (unspecified)
5
5
5
15
Bioaugmentation
2
2
5
9
Aerobic bioremediation
0
2
1
3
Chemical Treatment
15
9
13
37
In situ chemical oxidation
9
5
8
22
In situ chemical reduction
4
3
6
13
In situ chemical treatment (unspecified)
1
1
1
3
Neutralization
0
1
0
1
In situ chemical oxidation/reduction
1
0
0
1
• Number of decision documents selecting in situ bioremediation or in situ chemical treatment = 72.
• Decision documents with multiple remedies within a category are counted once per category, and documents
may be included in more than one remedy category.
Figure 16 shows the COCs most frequently addressed in recent groundwater decision documents.
Nearly 75 percent of groundwater decision documents have remedies that target halogenated
(primarily chlorinated) VOCs. Metals and BTEX are the next most common contaminant
categories at 47 and 33 percent, respectively. Of the 29 decision documents with anaerobic
bioremediation, 20 had COCs indicated, and all 20 included chlorinated VOCs. Of the 13 ISCR
projects, 10 indicated COCs, as follows: organic COCs only (5), metals and organic COCs (2),
metals only (2), and other inorganics (perchlorate) (1).
JULY 2017
27
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Figure 16: Detailed COCs in Decision Documents with Groundwater Remedies
(FY 2012-2014)
0C^
3%
CF
0N°+
• Number of groundwater decision documents with a COC and a remedy = 142.
VIII. Vapor Intrusion
Data for remedies that target air and soil gas media to address vapor intrusion have only recently
been tracked and were included for the first time in the SRR 14th Edition. From FY 2009 to 2014,
61 decision documents address vapor intrusion at 52 sites. Vapor intrusion mitigation
technologies and ICs selected in FY 2009 to 2014 decision documents are included in Table 7.
Descriptions of the mitigation technologies are found in Appendix A. The names of the mitigation
technologies have been simplified and may not match the previous edition of the SRR. Appendix
H lists the decision documents selecting vapor intrusion remedies from FY 2012 to 2014 by
technology.
Vapor intrusion is the term given to the migration of vapor-forming chemicals from any
underground source into a structure (for example, homes, businesses, schools). Contaminated
groundwater or soil is the most common subsurface vapor source, although contamination in
sewers, drain lines, and other conduits can also present a vapor intrusion threat in some settings.
Vapor-forming chemicals may include VOCs, select SVOCs, some pesticides, some PCBs, and
some inorganic contaminants, such as elemental mercury. Concentrations of vapor-forming
chemicals in indoor air may pose an unacceptable health risk to building occupants. EPA recently
issued two technical guides for assessing and mitigating vapor intrusion (EPA, 2015a and 2015b).
Thirty-six FY 2012, 2013, and 2014 decision documents address vapor intrusion at 31 sites (Table
7). Nine of these decision documents select vapor intrusion mitigation for existing structures. Five
of these specify active depressurization, passive barriers or sub-slab ventilation.
JULY 2017
28
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Eleven decision documents select ICs for vapor intrusion at existing structures. Twenty-five recent
decision documents include ICs related to building design and construction of future structures in
areas with subsurface contamination that does not support unlimited land use and unrestricted
exposure.
Table 7: Vapor Intrusion Remedies Selected in Decision Documents
(FY 2009-2014)
Remedy
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Total
Vapor Intrusion Mitigation at Existing
Structures
1
8
6
3
3
3
24
Active depressurization technology
0
6
3
1
0
3
13
Vapor intrusion mitigation (unspecified)
1
2
2
2
2
1
10
Sealing cracks and openings
0
4
1
0
0
0
5
Interior ventilation
0
4
0
0
0
0
4
Passive barrier (impermeable membrane)
0
0
1
1
1
0
3
Soil pressurization
0
3
0
0
0
0
3
Sub-slab ventilation
0
0
0
1
1
0
2
Institutional Controls
0
11
11
6
6
22
56
Future construction
0
9
7
4
5
16
41
Existing structures
0
6
6
3
2
6
23
• Number of decision documents selecting vapor intrusion remedies: FY 2009-201 I = 25, FY 2012-2014 = 36.
• Decision documents with multiple remedies within a category are counted once per category, and documents
may be included in more than one remedy category.
The OSWER Technical Guide for Assessing and Mitigating the Vapor Intrusion Pathway from Subsurface
Vapor Sources to Indoor Air (EPA, 2015a) states that "the preferred long-term response to the
intrusion of vapors into buildings is to eliminate or substantially reduce the level of contamination
in the subsurface vapor source (e.g., groundwater, subsurface soil, sewer lines) by vapor-forming
chemicals to acceptable-risk levels, thereby achieving a permanent remedy." Source or groundwater
remedies may have been selected to address subsurface contamination or such remedies may be
planned. Selected remedies are included in the source and groundwater sections (Section VI and
Section VII, respectively). Building mitigation for vapor intrusion should "be regarded as an
interim action that can provide effective human health protection, which may become part of a
final cleanup plan" (EPA, 2015a).
IX. Decision Documents at Federal Facilities
For this report, EPA conducted a separate analysis of decision documents and contaminants
associated with federal facilities on the NPL. Since 1983, EPA has signed 1,877 RODs, ROD
Amendments and ESDs for 171 federal facilities (Figures 17 and 18). These decision documents
are a subset of the documents shown in Figures 2 and 3. A small number of decision documents
are not available as indicated in the figures.
JULY 2017
29
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Figure 17: Federal Facility RODs and ROD Amendments per Year (FY 1983-2014)
$ RODs and Amendments Not Available - 20
¦ RODs and Amendments -1,581
m^m'^)p^ooo*HfNiro^Lnvor*-oocnOTHfNPO^j-cn«x)r^ooosiO|pHfNro«^-
cocooooooooooocncncri(T>oicT>a>cr>cncnoooooooQOO'HrH-(rH<-ir-i
CTIOICTIOICTICTICTIOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
*-)rHrH*HrH*-4rH(N(N(NrsJ(NCN(NrsJCN(NCN(Nrsl(NCN
Total number of federal facility ESDs = 276.
No federal facility ESDs were signed prior to 1993.
JULY 2017
30
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
A more detailed look at COCs at federal facilities with groundwater or soil remedies shows
halogenated VOCs (primarily chlorinated VOCs) and metals to be the most commonly addressed
in groundwater (Figure 19), and metals and PAHs the most common in soil (Figure 20).
Figure 19: Detailed COCs in Groundwater at Federal Facilities (FY 1983-2014)
100%
88%
27/0 26%
15%
23 ¦ 22
5%
fy
-V
^0+
Number of federal facilities with a groundwater remedy and groundwater COCs = 144.
Figure 20: Detailed COCs in Soil at Federal Facilities (FY 1983-2014)
03 >*
LI- "U
1 E 60%
53/6 52%
no ¦£
ra .ti
c 5 30%
24/o 24/o 23% 22%
Number of federal facilities with a soil remedy and soil COCs = 150.
JULY 2017
31
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
EPA also looked more closely at select categories of contaminants—munitions constituents,
radioactive materials, and chemical and biological warfare agents—that may be present at federal
facilities. Appendix D identifies which contaminants are included in each of these select
categories. Decision documents include groundwater and soil remedies addressing munitions
constituents and radioactive materials. The remedies most frequently address SVOC munitions
constituents (such as RDX) and radioactive metals (such as uranium) (Figures 21 and 22).
Figure 21: Select COCs in Groundwater at Federal Facilities (FY 1983-2014)
>
¦o
OJ
E
OJ
OL
3
¦o
c
o
13
ra
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
26% (37)
_JL_
20%
SVOC Metal/inorganic VOC
Munitions Constituents
12% (17)
_J
10%
5%
3%
Metal Non-metal
Radioactive Materials
Number of federal facilities with a groundwater remedy and groundwater COCs = 144.
JULY 2017
32
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Figure 22: Select COCs in Soil at Federal Facilities (FY 1983-2014)
30% 26% (39)
19% (28)
, 1 ,
' 18%
27
5%
8
¦ ¦ _L
SVOC Metal/inorganic VOC Metal Non-metal
Munitions Constituents Radioactive Materials
• Number of federal facilities with a soil remedy and soil COCs = 150.
X. Combined Remedies
Many of the remedies selected in FY 2012, 2013 or 2014 decision documents use a combined
remedy approach. Combined remedies include those that are combined spatially to treat different
media or areas of the plume at the same time or those that are implemented over time using a
phased approach. An example of a spatial approach is the use of one remedial technology for the
more concentrated plume core and another for areas of lower concentration in the distal plume.
In a phased approach, one remedial technology may follow another, such as in situ chemical
treatment followed by bioremediation. Phased approaches may be conducted to first address one
contaminant type and then another or may be conducted sequentially to lower contaminant
concentrations with one technology first and then further reduce contaminant concentrations to
reach designated cleanup levels with another technology. In some cases, synergistic effects from
one technology can enhance another. For example, heat remaining from ISTT may enhance
bioremediation.
The following highlights (Figures 23 through 26) present four applications of combined remedies
selected in recent decision documents:
¦ IS CO and aerobic bioremediation at Alameda Naval Air Station.
¦ ISTT and bioremediation (aerobic and anaerobic) at Mattiace Petrochemical Co., Inc.
¦ ISCR and anaerobic bioremediation at St. Julien's Creek Annex (U.S. Navy).
¦ Steam-enhanced extraction and in situ bioremediation at Williams Air Force Base.
25%
22%
ro -ft"
LL. T3
QJ
SE E
QJ
"o a:
Q) —
'o
20%
* 15%
LO
CD
10%
5%
<1%
Non-metal
Chemical/Biological
Warfare Agents
JULY 2017
33
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Figure 23: Combined Remedy Highlight - Alameda Naval Air Station
Alameda Naval Air Station, Alameda, California
ROD Date: 4/29/14
MEDIA/CONTAMINANTS
¦ Groundwater
¦ Chlorinated VOCs (vinyl chloride and trichloroethene)
REMEDIAL COMPONENTS
¦ ISCO
¦ Aerobic bioremediation
REMEDIAL APPROACH
¦ Spatial approach
¦ ISCO for higher concentrations in groundwater and aerobic bioremediation for
more dilute plume areas
OU-2C encompasses the groundwater contamination located at this former Naval Air
Station. Site uses included manufacturing and refurbishing associated with aircraft and
missile maintenance including painting, degreasing and cleaning of airplane parts, and
construction of aircraft components. The Station closed in 1997 and requires remedial
action to address VOCs found in groundwater and soils around several buildings.
The selected remedy for shallow groundwater in OU-2C includes the use of two in situ
treatment technologies: ISCO to treat high concentrations of VOCs and aerobic
bioremediation for the more dilute plume areas. This combination will reduce
concentrations in shallow groundwater to achieve the remedial goals and address the risks
associated with potential inhalation of vapors from chemicals in groundwater.
JULY 2017
34
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Figure 24: Combined Remedy Highlight - Mattiace Petrochemical Co., Inc.
Mattiace Petrochemical Co., Inc., Nassau County, New York
ROD Amendment Date: 9/29/14
MEDIA/CONTAMINANTS
¦ Groundwater, soil and LNAPL
¦ Chlorinated VOCs, BTEX
REMEDIAL COMPONENTS
¦ ISTT
¦ Bioventing
¦ Aerobic and anaerobic bioremediation
¦ Vertical engineered barrier (VEB) and phytoremediation (for hydraulic control)
REMEDIAL APPROACH
¦ Spatial approach
¦ ISTT in soil hot spot areas; bioventing, aerobic and anaerobic bioremediation in
LNAPL plume; VEB and phytoremediation in downgradient plume areas
This site began operating in the mid-1960s and activities consisted of storing, blending, and
repackaging of organic solvents. Numerous drums and aboveground and underground
storage tanks were used at the site. Removal activities began in 1988. RODs signed in 1990
and 1991 included the following remedies: soil excavation, off-site disposal of buried drums,
SVE for residual soil, P&T of groundwater, and LNAPL recovery. Since signing these RODs,
EPA has concluded that additional actions were necessary.
A ROD Amendment was signed in 2014 to address groundwater and soil gas contamination
remaining at the site. Several technologies were selected to address different areas of
contamination. ISTT was selected for higher concentrations of VOCs in soil and
groundwater. Bioventing was selected to address the residual source of contamination to
groundwater, which consists of both free-phase LNAPL and LNAPL in the smear zone.
Bioventing enhances aerobic biological degradation of hydrocarbons present in the LNAPL
and the associated vadose portion of the smear zone. The biological degradation process
produces fatty acids that, in turn, could be used by the anaerobic bacteria that are already
present in the groundwater to continue the natural degradation of chlorinated VOCs in the
groundwater and the saturated portion of the smear zone. In areas where existing conditions
are not conducive to optimal anaerobic bioremediation, amendments will be added to
enhance bioremediation of chlorinated VOCs in the groundwater. In addition, a VEB was
selected in downgradient areas where the depth to the nearest subsurface clay layer is
sufficiently shallow to limit future migration of both impacted groundwater and soil gas away
from the site. Phytoremediation for hydraulic control will also be used in conjunction with
the VEB to maintain water levels behind the wall and minimize the spread of contamination
at the site.
JULY 2017
35
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, I51 Edition
Figure 25: Combined Remedy Highlight - St. Julien's Creek Annex (U.S. Navy)
St. Julien's Creek Annex (U.S. Navy), Chesapeake, Virginia
ROD Date: 10/20/11
MEDIA/CONTAMINANTS
¦ Groundwater
¦ Chlorinated VOCs (vinyl chloride; cis-l,2-dichloroethene; 1,1-dichloroethene;
trichloroethene
REMEDIAL COMPONENTS
¦ ISCR
¦ Anaerobic bioremediation (enhanced reductive dechlorination [ERD])
REMEDIAL APPROACH
¦ Phased approach
¦ ISCR followed by anaerobic bioremediation
Site 21 is an industrial area in the south central portion of the facility, currently used for storage
and maintenance operations. The site encompasses a number of nearby industrial buildings,
including former machine, vehicle and locomotive maintenance shops; electrical shops; and
munitions-loading facilities. The outdoor areas were used for storing equipment and chemicals.
A fuel service station, including two underground storage tanks, operated just south of Building
187. The underground tanks were closed in place in 1982. Waste oils and degreasers (including
trichloroethene) were reportedly disposed of on the ground surface and around the railroad
tracks in this industrial area.
The selected remedy for Site 21 is shallow groundwater treatment through a two-step phased
approach. First, zero-valent iron will be injected in the high-concentration areas to promote
abiotic ISCR of the chlorinated VOCs to ethane and chloride. ISCR will be followed by
injections of an electron donor source, such as emulsified vegetable oil, to enhance reductive
dechlorination. Using ISCR prior to ERD is cost effective for high-concentration zones where
individual COC concentrations are greater than 1,000 [lg/L. The naturally occurring conditions
present at the site are favorable for the ISCR treatment followed by ERD. ISCO could also have
been effective but requires the reversing of oxidizing effects caused by the ISCO before the ERD
can be implemented. ERD will also be used in portions of the low-concentration zones where the
individual COC concentrations are greater than their respective cleanup level and less than
1,000 [ig/L.
JULY 2017
36
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Figure 26: Combined Remedy Highlight - Williams Air Force Base
Williams Air Force Base, Maricopa County, Arizona
ROD Amendment Date: 9/28/13
MEDIA/CONTAMINANTS
¦ Groundwater, LNAPL
¦ Benzene, toluene, and naphthalene
REMEDIAL COMPONENTS
¦ Steam enhanced extraction (SEE)
¦ In situ bioremediation
REMEDIAL APPROACH
¦ Phased and synergistic approach
¦ SEE followed by in situ bioremediation
OU-02 consists of the partially decommissioned Liquid Fuels Storage Area where releases of jet
fuel and other aviation gasoline have resulted in soil and groundwater contamination. The base
remains an active flight training facility, but closure of the site is planned.
The remedy selected in the original ROD for OU-02 included SVE, LNAPL recovery and
groundwater extraction. SVE and LNAPL recovery were initiated and continue to be conducted.
A pilot study showed that groundwater P&T would not effectively remediate the groundwater. A
ROD Amendment was issued in 2013 selecting SEE followed by in situ bioremediation for
groundwater.
The plan is to operate the SEE system until performance diminishes, then conduct in situ
bioremediation using the residual heat produced by the SEE system. Bioremediation will be
enhanced by the potential addition of food sources or modification of the environment, such as
a change in temperature or pH. Monitored natural attenuation may occur after bioremediation
until remedial action objectives have been attained.
XI. Optimization
EPA has been conducting optimization reviews and providing technical support to specific projects
since 1997. Early in the program, optimization reviews focused on Fund-lead groundwater P&T
remedies and primarily addressed the remedy and long-term monitoring stages. EPA has since
established a new national optimization workgroup and issued the National Strategy to Expand
Superfund Optimization Practices from Site Assessment to Site Completion (EPA, 2012o). It
expands and formalizes optimization practices from site assessment to site completion for the
Superfund program.
EPA's National Optimization Strategy "...institutes changes to Superfund remedial program
business processes to take advantage of newer tools and strategies that promote more effective and
efficient cleanups. The Strategy identifies several objectives to achieve verifiably protective site
cleanups faster, cleaner, greener and cheaper. The objectives deploy techniques throughout the life
cycle of site cleanup, including site evaluation, construction and operation and maintenance.
JULY 2017
37
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Many of these approaches have been applied for years at a subset of sites under the U.S. EPA's
management as well as sites managed by other federal and state programs. The body of knowledge
on applied optimization techniques and their use throughout the cleanup life cycle is substantial
and growing rapidly" (EPA, 2012o).
EPA identified two recent decision documents, summarized in Figures 27 and 28, that have been
informed, in part, by site optimization. The highlights provide more detail on the focus of the
optimization review and how its conclusions and recommendations informed subsequent remedy
decisions.
¦ EPA conducted an optimization study and a technical support project to support cleanup
of the Hamilton/Labree Roads Groundwater Contamination site, OU 01, in Washington
State. The 2009 optimization recommended further site characterization and sequenced
remedial approaches. After additional characterization, the 2013 Interim ROD selected
ISTT of soil and sediment followed by any needed removal and off-site disposal of
remaining higher-concentration sediment and surface soil, before implementing in situ
bioremediation of remaining contamination in subsurface soil.
¦ The optimization study for the Kearsarge Metallurgical Corp. in New Hampshire
recommended further evaluation of MNA. After a focused feasibility study, the 2012 ROD
Amendment selected MNA and discontinuation of the P&T system.
JULY 2017
38
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Figure 27: Optimization Highlight - Hamilton/Labree Roads Groundwater
Contamination
Hamilton/Labree Roads Groundwater Contamination, OU 01, Chehalis, Washington
Optimization Review: December 2009 and 2015
Interim ROD Date: 8/28/13
NATURE OF CONTAMINATION & SCOPE OF OPTIMIZATION REVIEW
¦ Tetrachloroethene (PCE) contamination in soil, sediment, and groundwater
¦ Evaluate prior and current investigations, feasibility studies, and other site data to
determine state of readiness for a proposed Interim Remedial Measure
¦ Determine level of uncertainty in data used to evaluate and select proposed remedies
¦ Provide additional site characterization support to assist in remedial design
RECOMMENDATIONS
¦ Conduct additional site characterization - current understanding of the nature and
extent of contamination is too unreliable to support estimation of treatment volumes
and remedy technology selection
¦ Select more aggressive remedial alternatives in a refined source area footprint that limits
need for hydraulic controls and treatment of large volumes of contaminated
groundwater
¦ Develop a site ROD that is flexible and contains triggers that allow for implementation
of alternative treatment options
¦ Conduct three-dimensional visualization and analysis (3DVA) to aid in site
characterization
REMEDIAL DECISION
¦ Issued an interim ROD to provide flexibility and step-wise approach to addressing site
contamination
¦ Selected ISTT, excavation and disposal of surface soil and sediment; in situ
bioremediation of subsurface soil; and in situ bioremediation of groundwater
OU 01 is the Hamilton Road Impact Area of this site. Past activities in this area resulted in PCE
contamination of soil, sediment, and groundwater. The 2009 optimization found that additional
information was needed to resolve key data gaps in order to develop accurate volumetric
estimates of contaminated media to be addressed and to select technologies that will ensure
interim goals are met. The optimization suggested tandem or sequenced remedial approaches
with a more aggressive source reduction step prior to bioremediation. After additional
characterization, the 2013 Interim ROD selected ISTT of soil and sediment with greater than 10
mg/lcg of PCE followed by (1) removal and off-site disposal of any remaining sediment and
surface soil with greater than 10 mg/lcg PCE and (2) in situ bioremediation of remaining
subsurface soil with greater than 10 mg/lcg PCE. In situ bioremediation also was selected for
groundwater contamination.
In 2015, during project design, technical support was provided to plan and conduct a dynamic
field investigation to further refine the areas for remedial activities selected in the 2013 ROD.
The technical support project identified the footprint of each selected remedy component. Real-
time measurement technologies combined with 3DVA mapping of results helped delineate the
various contamination zones. Real-time results from each day's investigative efforts were
processed in 3DVA software and the visualizations were then used to help guide the investigative
efforts on the following days. The results of the effort are being used in the design of the multi-
component remedy.
JULY 2017
39
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Figure 28: Optimization Highlight - Kearsarge Metallurgical Corp.
Kearsarge Metallurgical Corp., Conway, New Hampshire
Optimization Review: December 2009
ROD Amendment Date: 9/18/12
NATURE OF CONTAMINATION & SCOPE OF OPTIMIZATION REVIEW
¦ 1,1,1-trichloroethane; 1,1-dichloroethane and 1,1-dichloroethene in groundwater
¦ Optimize groundwater monitoring program to ensure data fully support site
management decisions relating to long-term remedial strategy and property reuse options
RECOMMENDATIONS
¦ Eliminate some wells from monitoring network and reduce sampling frequency at others
¦ Evaluate continued attenuation of source using five identified wells
REMEDIAL DECISION
¦ Conducted a Focused Feasibility Study (FFS) using monitoring results from
recommended wells to evaluate MNA
¦ Issued a ROD Amendment selecting MNA as follow-on remedial approach to replace
groundwater P&T system, reducing costs while still projecting to reach cleanup levels
within 18.5 years or less
In a 1990 ROD, EPA, with the concurrence of the New Hampshire Department of
Environmental Services (NHDES), selected a comprehensive remedy for the Site that addressed
groundwater as well as contaminated soils and materials. The groundwater treatment plant
attained cleanup levels through much of the site by the late 1990s except for an area east of the
treatment building. In 2003, NHDES excavated an additional 5,670 tons of contaminated,
saturated soils. NHDES operated the groundwater extraction and treatment plant until
December 2005, when EPA agreed to halt groundwater recovery to assess site conditions.
A 2009 optimization review found the following: active remediation from 1993 to 2005 had
diminished contamination at the Site and the majority of monitoring wells showed no, or low
and decreasing levels of contamination; biotic and abiotic degradation pathways were actively
transforming the contaminants at the site; plume-wide concentrations were stable with the
exception of three wells that showed increasing concentrations; and a longer-term dataset
collected under ambient conditions was required to confirm plume stability.
In 2010, a FFS found that 225 pounds of VOC contaminants had been removed by the P&T
system, approximately 150 pounds had been removed by the 2003 excavation, and that less than
3 pounds of VOCs remained in the subsurface, primarily attached to saturated silt. A residual
plume of groundwater contamination was found to exist in a 20,000 square-foot area in
saturated silts that are approximately 4 to 6 feet thick. It was determined that greater than 99
percent of the contaminants had been removed.
A 2012 FFS evaluated the potential of an alternative remedy, MNA, to replace the current P&T
system. This FFS concluded concentrations had declined for all contaminants in all wells as
verified by the October 2011 sampling event. The MNA alternative provided similar overall
protection in a similar timeframe (18.5 years or less for MNA, 15.4 years or less for P&T) at
significantly lower cost than the P&T system. A ROD Amendment selecting MNA was issued in
September 2012.
JULY 2017
40
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
XII. Conclusions
Based on EPA's analysis of recently selected remedies (FYs 2012, 2013, and 2014) and trends over
the life of the Superfund program, treatment continues to be selected frequently and is now
selected at 78 percent of Superfund sites with decision documents. Superfund also continues to
address complex sites involving multiple media and contaminants. In addition, combined
remedies are being applied concurrently, using a phased approach, or using a spatial approach to
address different types or concentrations of contaminants. Additionally, optimization studies have
led to remedy changes in recent decision documents.
With respect to recent source remedies:
¦ The Superfund remedial program continued to select treatment for a large number of
source remedies.
¦ Source remedies continued to include a combination of treatment, on-site containment,
off-site disposal and ICs.
¦ Nearly one-quarter of recent source decision documents selected in situ treatment.
¦ SVE, chemical treatment and ISTT were the most frequently selected remedies for in situ
treatment.
¦ Physical separation and recycling were recently selected most often for ex situ treatment.
¦ Remedies in nearly three-quarters of recent source decision documents addressed metals.
¦ Almost all sediment decision documents included excavation or dredging. Nearly half of
sediment decision documents included either in situ or ex situ treatment (primarily
dewatering).
Concerning recent groundwater remedies:
¦ The selection of in situ treatment for groundwater continued its overall upward trend and
increased to 51 percent of recent groundwater decision documents.
¦ The selection of P&T in groundwater decision documents has decreased significantly since
the early 1990s and has reached its lowest, 17 percent, in FY 2014.
¦ Nearly 80 percent of recent groundwater decision documents included ICs.
¦ The selection of alternative water supply remedies and VEBs was steady.
¦ Bioremediation and chemical treatment were the most frequently selected in situ remedies
for groundwater.
¦ The majority of in situ bioremediation remedies specified anaerobic bioremediation. More
than half of the chemical treatment remedies specified ISCO.
¦ The most common COCs addressed by groundwater remedies were halogenated VOCs,
primarily chlorinated VOCs.
JULY 2017
41
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Regarding vapor intrusion remedies:
¦ Active depressurization was the most frequently selected technology for vapor intrusion
mitigation.
¦ ICs were frequently selected to reduce the risk of exposure to vapor intrusion in current
buildings and to require mitigation for future structures constructed in areas with
subsurface contamination that does not support unlimited land use and unrestricted
exposure.
Regarding remedies for federal facilities:
¦ Nearly 40 percent of the total number of RODs and ROD Amendments selected over the
life of the Superfund program were for federal facilities, and 25 percent of ESDs.
¦ Nearly half (47 percent) of the decision documents (RODs, ROD Amendments and ESDs)
from FY 2012 to 2014 were for federal facilities.
¦ Halogenated VOCs and metals were the most common contaminants targeted by
groundwater remedies for federal facilities, and metals and PAHs were the most common
contaminants addressed by soil remedies.
¦ Decision documents included groundwater and soil remedies addressing munitions
constituents and radioactive materials, with SVOC munitions and radioactive metals being
most frequent.
Concerning recent combined remedies:
¦ Selected remedies were combined using a spatial, phased or synergistic approach.
- The ROD for Alameda Naval Air Station included a spatial approach consisting of
IS CO for higher concentrations in groundwater and aerobic bioremediation for more
dilute plume areas.
- The ROD Amendment at Williams Air Force Base included both a phased and
synergistic approach with steam-enhanced extraction followed by in situ
bioremediation that would benefit from the residual heat.
Concerning optimization:
¦ Some recent decision documents were partially informed by optimization reviews. At
Hamilton/Labree Roads Groundwater Contamination site, the optimization review
suggested a step-wise approach to remediation with aggressive source remediation before
addressing groundwater. In 2013, an interim ROD was issued to conduct ISTT in the
source area followed by in situ bioremediation of the groundwater.
¦ Optimization recommendations for these sites included further site characterization and
feasibility studies that led to remedy changes.
The remedy and site information provided in this report informs stakeholders in Superfund
communities about the program's remedy decisions, and helps federal, state and tribal remediation
professionals select remedies. Analyzing the trends in remedy decisions provides an indication of
the future demand for remedial technologies, which helps technology developers, and consulting
and engineering firms, evaluate cleanup markets. The trends also indicate program needs for
JULY 2017
42
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
expanded technical information and support related to specific technologies or site cleanup
challenges. For example, growing use of in situ groundwater technologies suggests the need for
additional knowledge and support associated with those technologies.
XIII. Sources and Electronic Versions
This section lists the sources of information used in this report and provides information on how
to access the electronic version of this report and previous versions of the ASR and SRR.
Sources
EPA. 199 la. A Guide to Principal Threat and Low Level Threat Wastes. Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response (OSWER). November. Publication 9355.3-02FS.
https://semspub.epa.g0v/work/ 0(
EPA. 1991b. Remediation of Contaminated Sediments. Office of Research and Development.
April. EPA/625/6-91/028. https://senispub. v ' , * •
EPA. 1996. A Citizen's Guide to Soil Washing. OSWER. April. EPA 542-F-96-002.
https://1 1 i -xgt/10 ' i =10002:.- ' ¦' :
EPA. 1997a. Analysis of Selected Enhancements for Soil Vapor Extraction. OSWER. September.
EPA 542-R-97-007. https://semspub.epa.~ : >rk * ' , 1"
EPA. 1997b. Presumptive Remedy: Supplemental Bulletin Multi-Phase Extraction (MPE)
Technology for VOCs in Soil and Groundwater. OSWER. April. EPA 540-F-97-004.
https://senispub.epa. gov/worl<
EPA. 1998. Field Applications of In Situ Remediation Technologies: Ground-Water Circulation
Wells. OSWER. October. EPA 542-R-98-009.
https://semspub.epa.gov/worlj
EPA. 1999a. A Guide to Preparing Superfund Proposed Plans, Records of Decision, and Other
Remedy Selection Decision Documents. OSWER. July. EPA 540-R-98-031.
https://senispub.epa. gov/worl<
EPA. 1999b. Use of Monitored Natural Attenuation at Superfund, RCRA Corrective Action, and
Underground Storage Tank Sites. OSWER. April 21. OSWER Directive No. 9200.4-17P.
https://ncpis.cpa.WExc/XvPDFxa/2000ISlJG.PDR
EPA. 2000. Engineered Approaches to In Situ Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents. OSWER.
lulv. EPA 542-R-00-008. https://semspub.cp; - --orb , • ¦'
EPA. 2001. Use of Bioremediation at Superfund Sites. OSWER. September. EPA 542-R-01-019.
www.ep; , ' /'production/!ilcs/2015-06/documcnts/l • • • ¦1 tion 542r0101 i *
JULY 2017
43
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
EPA. 2002. Principles for Managing Contaminated Sediment Risks at Hazardous Waste Sites.
OSWER. February 12. OSWER Directive No. 9285.6-08.
https://senispub.epa.gov/work/05/209897.pdl
EPA. 2005. Contaminated Sediment Remediation Guidance for Hazardous Waste Sites. OSWER.
December. EPA 540-R-05-012. https://senispub.epa.gov/wc
EPA. 2006. In Situ Treatment Technologies for Contaminated Soil: Engineering Forum Issue
Paper. OSWER. November. EPA 542-F-06-013. www.epa.gov/sites/production/1 iles/2015-
04/documents/tsp issue paper 542106013.pdl
EPA. 2007. The Use of Soil Amendments for Remediation, Revitalization, and Reuse. OSWER.
December. EPA 542-R-07-013. https://semspub.epa.gov/work/11/176023.pdl
EPA. 2008a. Engineering Issue: Indoor Air Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Approaches. National Risk
Management Research Laboratory; Office of Research and Development. October. EPA
600-R-08-115. www.epa.gov/sites/production • = " ; - " '<•.= ¦¦ l. * ' =- • 1 ! ' !¦
EPA. 2008b. Understanding the Superfund Alternative Approach. OSWER. April. EPA 330-R-08-
001. https:/ , ub.t /wo- i- i '• i'
EPA. 2008c. Wetlands Compensatory Mitigation. Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds.
EPA 843-F-08-002. www.epa.gov/sites/production/1 iles/2015-
08/documerits/compensatory mitigation 1 actsheet.pdl
EPA. 2010. Update on Providing Alternative Water Supply as Part of Superfund Response
Actions. OSWER. September. OSWER Directive No. 9355.3-22.
https://semspub.epa.gov/worl«
EPA. 2011. Fact Sheet on Evapotranspiration Cover Systems for Waste Containment. OSWER.
February. EPA 542-F-l 1-001. https://semspub.epa.gov/work/ F
EPA. 2012a. A Citizen's Guide to Activated Carbon Treatment. OSWER. September. EPA 542-F-
12-001. https://semspub.epa.gov/work/b
EPA. 2012b. A Citizen's Guide to Air Stripping. OSWER. September. EPA 542-F-l2-002.
https://senispub.epa.gov/work/l~ 7 02. pel 1
EPA. 2012c. A Citizen's Guide to Capping. OSWER. September. EPA 542-F-l2-004.
https://semspub.epa.gov/work/05/92206Q.pdi
EPA. 2012d. A Citizen's Guide to Fracturing for Site Cleanup. OSWER. September. EPA 542-F-
12-008. https://scn , 1 -pa.gov/work/P '
EPA. 2012e. A Citizen's Guide to In Situ Chemical Reduction. OSWER. September. EPA 542-F-
12-012. https://semspub.epa.gov/work/ b
EPA. 2012f. A Citizen's Guide to In Situ Thermal Treatment. OSWER. September. EPA 542-F-l2-
013. https://senispub.epa.gov/work/05/919610.pdl
JULY 2017
44
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
EPA. 2012g. A Citizen's Guide to Incineration. OSWER. September. EPA 542-F-l2-020.
https://semypub.epa.gov/wort >dt
EPA. 2012h. A Citizen's Guide to Pump and Treat. OSWER. September. EPA 542-F-12-017.
https://senispub.epa. gov/work
EPA. 2012i. A Citizen's Guide to Soil Vapor Extraction and Air Sparging. OSWER. September.
EPA 542-F-12-018. https://semspub.epa.gov/work
EPA. 2012j. A Citizen's Guide to Solidification and Stabilization. OSWER. September. EPA 542-
F-12-019, https://senispub.ep;: • ork/HO/156? •" .• is
EPA. 2012k. A Citizen's Guide to Thermal Desorption. OSWER. September. EPA 542-F-12-020.
https://semspub.epa.gov/work ;,di
EPA. 20121. A Citizen's Guide to Vapor Intrusion Mitigation. OSWER. September. EPA 542-F-12-
022. https://semspub.epa.gov/work/ HP/158721.pdl
EPA. 2012m. A Citizen's Guide to Vertical Engineered Barriers. OSWER. September. EPA 542-F-
12-022. https://semspub.epa.gov/work/ b
EPA. 2012n. Institutional Controls: A Guide to Planning, Implementing, Maintaining, and
Enforcing Institutional Controls at Contaminated Sites. OSWER. December. EPA 540-R-
09-011. https://semspub.epa.gov/wor
EPA. 2012o. National Strategy to Expand Superfund Optimization Practices from Site Assessment
to Site Completion. OSWER. September. OSWER Directive No. 9200.3-75.
https://semspub.epa.gOv/work/h:
EPA. 2015a. OSWER Technical Guide for Assessing and Mitigating the Vapor Intrusion Pathway
from Subsurface Vapor Sources to Indoor Air. OSWER. June. Publication 9200.2-154.
https://senispub.et - ¦ .' »vork/F '145 P
EPA. 2015b. Technical Guide for Assessing Petroleum Vapor Intrusion at Leaking Underground
Storage Tank Sites. Office of Underground Storage Tanks. June. EPA 510-R-15-001.
www.ep; . • .•''production , " '• '/documents/pvi-E ' - -1 -
Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable (FRTR). 2007. Remediation Technologies
Screening Matrix and Reference Guide, 4th Edition. January, www.lrtr.gov.
Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council (ITRC). 1997. Technical and Regulatory Guidelines
for Soil Washing. Metals in Soil Workgroup. Washington, D.C. December. MIS-1.
www.dtie, mi 1/dtic/tr/l u lite 6379.pdl
ITRC. 2003. Technical and Regulatory Guidance Document for Constructed Treatment
Wetlands. Wetlands Work Group. Washington, D.C. December. WTLND-1.
www.itrcweb.org/GuidariceDocuments/WTLND-l.pdll
JULY 2017
45
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
ITRC. 2007. Technical and Regulatory Guidance Document for Vapor Intrusion Pathway: A
Practical Guideline. Washington, D.C. January. VI-1.
https://senispub.epa.gov/worl<
ITRC. 2011. Permeable Reactive Barrier: Technology Update. Permeable Reactive Barrier Work
Group. Washington, D.C. June. PRB-5-1. https://senispub.epa.gov/work
Karn, Barbara; Kuiken, Todd; and Otto, Martha. 2009. Nanotechnology and in Situ Remediation:
A Review of the Benefits and Potential Risks. Environmental Health Perspectives.
December. Volume 117, Number 12. pp. 1823-1831. httm://ehp.nietis.mh,gov/wi>
content/upload. »dl
JULY 2017
46
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Electronic Versions
SRR 15th Edition is available electronically at www.epa.gov/remedvtech/superlund-reniedv-report.
The body of the report and its appendices can be downloaded from the website. The list below
describes the appendices for the SRR 15th Edition.
Appendix A: Definitions of Selected Remedies. This appendix defines the specific remedies
selected as part of remedial actions.
Appendix B: Treatment Technologies by Fiscal Year. This appendix lists the ex situ and in situ
source treatment technologies, groundwater in situ treatment technologies and groundwater pump
and treat remedies by fiscal year from 1982 to 2014.
Appendix C: Remedy Selection Summary Matrix FY 2012-2014. This appendix lists the remedy
components selected in each decision document analyzed for the SRR 15th Edition.
Appendix D: Individual Contaminants and Assigned Contaminant Groups. This appendix lists
the individual contaminants from decision documents and identifies which contaminant groups
the individual contaminants were assigned.
Appendix E: Source Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-2014. This
appendix lists the source remedies selected from FY 2012 to 2014 and the associated sites and
operable units.
Appendix F: Sediment Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-2014. This
appendix lists the sediment remedies selected from FY 2012 to 2014 and the associated sites and
operable units.
Appendix G: Groundwater Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-2014. This
appendix lists the groundwater technologies selected in decision documents from FY 2012 to 2014
and the associated sites and operable units.
Appendix H: Vapor Intrusion Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-2014.
This appendix lists the vapor intrusion remedies selected from FY 2012 to 2014 and the associated
sites and operable units.
In addition, previous editions of ASR and SRR can be downloaded from
www,epa,g(w/rt: su perl u n d-reni edv-report.
JULY 2017
47
-------
Appendix A
Definitions of Selected Remedies
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Appendix A: Definitions of Selected Remedies
Table of Contents
A. 1 Treatment Technologies A-3
A. 1.1 Biological Treatment A-3
Bioaugmentation A-3
Bioremediation A-3
Constructed Treatment Wetlands A-3
Phytoremediation A-3
A. 1.2 Chemical Treatment A-4
Cap (amended, in situ) A-4
Chemical Fixation A-4
Chemical Oxidation A-4
Chemical Reduction A-4
In Situ Chemical Oxidation (ISCO) A-4
In Situ Chemical Reduction (ISCR) A-4
Nanoremediation A-4
Neutralization A-5
Permeable Reactive Barriers (PRB) A-5
A. 1.3 Physical Treatment A-5
Air Sparging A-5
Electrokinetic Separation A-5
Flushing A-6
In Situ Geochemical Stabilization A-6
In-Well Air Stripping A-6
Mechanical Soil Aeration A-6
Multi-Phase Extraction (MPE) A-6
Physical Separation A-6
Recycling A-7
Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) A-7
Soil Washing A-7
Solidification and Stabilization (S/S) A-7
Solvent Extraction A-8
A. 1.4 Thermal Treatment A-8
Electrical Resistance Heating (ERH) A-8
Incineration A-8
In Situ Thermal Treatment (ISTT) A-8
In Situ Thermal Desorption A-9
Open Burn (OB) A-9
Steam Enhanced Extraction (SEE) A-9
Thermal Conduction Heating (TCH) A-9
Thermal Desorption A-9
Thermally-Enhanced SVE A-10
Vitrification A-10
JULY 2017 A-1
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
A. 1.5 Pump and Treat (P&T) A-10
Activated Carbon Treatment A-10
Air Stripping A-l 1
Filtration A-l 1
Ion Exchange A-l 1
Metals Precipitation A-l 1
A. 2 On-Site Containment Technologies A-12
Caps and Cover Systems A-12
Cap (In situ) A-12
Containment Cell (subaqueous) A-12
Containment Cell (upland, adjacent) A-12
Evapotranspiration (ET) Covers A-13
Vertical Engineered Barriers (VEB) A-13
A.3 Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA) A-13
A.4 Monitored Natural Recovery (MNR) for Sediment A-13
A.5 Enhanced Monitored Natural Recovery (EMNR) for Sediment A-14
A. 6 Vapor Intrusion Mitigation A-14
Active Depressurization Technology A-15
Interior Ventilation A-15
Passive Barrier (Impermeable Membrane) Installation A-15
Passive Soil Depressurization A-15
Positive Building Pressurization A-15
Sealing Cracks and Openings A-15
Soil Pressurization A-15
Sub-slab Ventilation A-16
A. 7 Other or Unspecified Remedies A-16
Alternative Water Supply Remedy A-16
Fracturing for Site Cleanup A-16
Institutional Controls (ICs) A-17
Soil Amendments A-l7
Wetlands Replacement A-17
Wetlands Restoration A-17
JULY 2017 A-2
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
A. I Treatment Technologies
Most treatment technologies were grouped into one of the four main treatment categories:
biological, chemical, physical or thermal treatment. Ex situ treatment technologies associated with
pump and treat systems are included separately as its own treatment category.
A. I. I Biological Treatment
Biological treatment involves adding or stimulating the growth of microorganisms, which
metabolize contaminants or create conditions under which contaminants will chemically convert
to non-hazardous or less toxic compounds or compounds that are more stable, less mobile, and/or
inert. Phytoremediation, the use of plants to remove, stabilize, or destroy contaminants, is
included in the definition of biological treatment.
Bioaugmentation is "[the] addition of microbes to the subsurface where organisms able to degrade
specific contaminants are deficient. Microbes may be 'seeded' from populations already present at
a site and grown in aboveground reactors or from specially cultivated strains of bacteria having
known capabilities to degrade specific contaminants" (EPA, 2000).
Bioremediation "is a technology that uses microorganisms to treat contaminants through natural
biodegradation mechanisms (intrinsic bioremediation) or by enhancing natural biodegradation
mechanisms through the addition of microbes, nutrients, electron donors, and/or electron
acceptors (enhanced bioremediation). This technology, performed in situ (below ground or in
place) or ex situ (above ground), is capable of degrading organic compounds to less toxic materials
such as carbon dioxide (C02), methane, and water through aerobic or anaerobic processes" (EPA,
2001).
Constructed Treatment Wetlands are "manmade wetlands built to remove various types of
pollutants that may be present in water that flows through them. They are constructed to recreate,
to the extent possible, the structure and function of natural wetlands...They possess a rich
microbial community in the sediment to effect the biochemical transformation of pollutants, they
are biologically productive, and...they are self-sustaining....[Constructed wetlands] utilize many of
the mechanisms of phytoremediation" (ITRC, 2003). Note that the term "constructed wetlands" is
used to refer only to wetlands constructed for the purposes of treatment, and not to wetlands
constructed to compensate for wetlands destroyed by a remedy (such as placement of a cap in a
marsh). Such "compensatory wetlands" are considered as "Wetlands Replacement."
Phytoremediation "uses [macroscopic] plants to extract, degrade, contain, or immobilize
contaminants in soil, groundwater, and other contaminated media. The phytoremediation
mechanisms used to treat contaminated [media]...are phytoextraction, rhizodegradation,
phytodegradation, phytovolatilization, and phytostabilization" (EPA, 2006). Phytoremediation may
be applied in situ or ex situ.
Note that while phytoremediation may include the use of microorganisms in conjunction with
plants, it is distinguished from bioremediation in that bioremediation does not use macroscopic
plants or trees. For purposes of this report, the use of plants to control surface water drainage, to
influence groundwater movement, or to adjust the water table are not considered
phytoremediation since the purpose is not to extract the contaminants from the media. Such
remedies are classified as engineering controls.
JULY 2017
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
A. 1.2 Chemical Treatment
Chemical treatment chemically converts hazardous contaminants to non-hazardous or less toxic
compounds or compounds that are more stable, less mobile, inert, or all three. Even though a
chemical reaction is not always involved in chemical precipitation, chemical precipitation is
typically included in this category.
Cap (amended, in situ) for sediment refers to a subaqueous cover in which "[specialized] materials
[are] used to enhance the chemical isolation capacity...compared to sand caps. Examples
include...reactive/adsorptive materials such as activated carbon, apatite, coke, organoclay, zero-
valent iron and zeolite. Composite geotextile mats containing one or more of these materials (i.e.,
reactive core mats) are becoming available commercially" (EPA, 2005).
Chemical Fixation or Chemical Stabilization— See Solidification and Stabilization.
Chemical Oxidation "typically involves reduction/oxidation (redox) reactions that chemically
convert hazardous contaminants to nonhazardous or less toxic compounds that are more stable,
less mobile, or inert. Redox reactions involve the transfer of electrons from one chemical to
another. Specifically, one reactant is oxidized (loses electrons) and one is reduced (gains electrons).
There are several oxidants capable of degrading contaminants. Commonly used oxidants include
potassium or sodium permanganate, Fenton's catalyzed hydrogen peroxide, hydrogen peroxide,
ozone, and sodium persulfate. Each oxidant has advantages and limitations, and while applicable
to soil contamination and some source zone contamination, they have been applied primarily
toward remediating groundwater" (EPA, 2006). Chemical oxidation can be conducted either in
situ or ex situ.
Chemical Reduction "uses chemicals called 'reducing agents' to help change contaminants into
less toxic or less mobile forms....[Chemical reduction] can clean up several types of contaminants
dissolved in groundwater. It can also be used to clean up contaminants known as 'dense non-
aqueous phase liquids' or 'DNAPLs,' which do not dissolve easily in groundwater and can be a
source of contamination for a long time. [Chemical reduction] is most often used to clean up the
metal chromium and the industrial solvent trichloroethene, or 'TCE,' which is a DNAPL.
"Common reducing agents include zero valent metals, which are metals in their pure form. The
most common metal used in [in situ chemical reduction (ISCR)] is zero valent iron, or 'ZVI.' ZVI
must be ground up into small granules for use in ISCR. In some cases, micro- or nano-scale
(extremely small) particles are used. The smaller particle size increases the amount of iron available
to react with contaminants. Other common reducing agents include polysulfides, sodium
dithionite, ferrous iron, and bimetallic materials, which are made up of two different metals. The
most common bimetallic material used in ISCR is iron coated with a thin layer of palladium or
silver" (EPA, 2012e).
In Situ Chemical Oxidation (ISCO) — See Chemical Oxidation.
In Situ Chemical Reduction (ISCR) — See Chemical Reduction.
Nanoremediation "methods entail the application of reactive nanomaterials for transformation
and detoxification of pollutants. These nanomaterials have properties that enable both chemical
JULY 2017
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
reduction and catalysis to mitigate the pollutants of concern....Because of their minute size and
innovative surface coatings, nanoparticles may be able to pervade very small spaces in the
subsurface and remain suspended in groundwater, allowing the particles to travel farther than
larger, macro-sized particles and achieve wider distribution....
"Many different nanoscale materials have been explored for remediation....Of these, nanoscale
zero-valent iron (nZVI) is currently the most widely used....nZVI particles range from 10 to 100
[nanometers (nm)j in diameter....The high reactivity of nZVI particles is in part a direct result of
their high specific surface area....nZVI's small particle size also allows more of the material to
penetrate into soil pores, and it can be more easily injected into shallow and deep aquifers, a
property that is particularly beneficial when contamination lies underneath a building" (Karn,
Kuiken, & Otto, 2009).
Neutralization is a chemical reaction between an acid and a base. The reaction involves acidic or
caustic wastes that are neutralized (pH is adjusted toward 7.0) using caustic or acid additives.
Permeable Reactive Barriers (PRB) are "in situ, permeable treatment zone[s] designed to intercept
and remediate a contaminant plume. The term 'barrier' is intended to convey the idea that
contaminant migration is impeded; however, the PRB is designed to be more permeable than the
surrounding aquifer media so that groundwater can easily flow through the structure without
significantly altering groundwater hydrology. The treatment zone may be created directly using
reactive materials such as ZVI, or indirectly using materials designed to stimulate secondary
processes (e.g., adding carbon substrate and nutrients to enhance microbial activity). In this way,
contaminant treatment may occur through physical, chemical, or biological processes" (ITRC,
2011).
A. 1.3 Physical Treatment
Physical treatment uses the physical properties of the contaminants or the contaminated medium
to separate or immobilize the contamination.
Air Sparging "involves drilling one or more injection wells into the soil below the water table. An
air compressor at the surface pumps air underground through the wells. As air bubbles flow
through the groundwater, it carries contaminant vapors upward into the soil above the water table.
The mixture of air and vapors is then pulled out of the ground for treatment using [soil vapor
extraction (SVE)]" (EPA, 2012i). Oxygen added to the contaminated groundwater and vadose-zone
soils also can enhance biodegradation of contaminants below and above the water table. The
injection of ozone into the aquifer is referred to as ozone sparging and is a form of chemical
treatment.
Electrokinetic Separation is "an emerging technology that relies on the application of a low-
intensity, direct current through the soil to separate and extract heavy metals, radionuclides, and
organic contaminants from unsaturated soil, sludge, and sediment. The current is applied across
electrode pairs that have been implanted in the ground on each side of the contaminated soil
mass. During electromigration, positively charged chemical species, such as metals, ammonium
ions, and some organic compounds, move toward the cathode, and negatively charged chemicals,
such as chloride, cyanide, fluoride, nitrate, and negatively-charged organic species, migrate toward
JULY 2017
A-5
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
the anode....The target compounds are either extracted to a recovery system or deposited at the
electrode" (EPA, 2006).
Flushing "involves flooding a zone of contamination with an appropriate solution to remove the
contaminant from the soil. Water or liquid solution is injected or infiltrated into the area of
contamination. The contaminants are mobilized by solubilization, formation of emulsions, or a
chemical reaction with the flushing solutions. After passing through the contamination zone, the
contaminant-bearing fluid is collected and brought to the surface for disposal, recirculation, or on-
site treatment and reinjection....Flushing solutions may be water, acidic aqueous solutions, basic
solutions, chelating or complexing agents, reducing agents, cosolvents, or surfactants" (EPA, 2006).
In Situ Geochemical Stabilization — See Chemical Treatment (for groundwater) or Solidification
and Stabilization (for source media).
In-Well Air Stripping systems "create a circulation pattern in the aquifer by drawing water into and
pumping it through the wells, and then reintroducing the water into the aquifer without bringing
it above ground....The well is double-cased with hydraulically separated upper and lower screened
intervals within the aquifer....The system can be configured with an upward in-well flow or a
downward in-well flow. The most common configurations involve the injection of air into the
inner casing, decreasing the density of the groundwater and allowing it to rise....Through this
system, volatile contaminants in the ground water are transferred from the dissolved phase to the
vapor phase by the rising air bubbles. Contaminated vapors can be drawn off and treated above
ground or discharged into the vadose zone" (EPA, 1998).
Mechanical Soil Aeration agitates contaminated soil, using tilling or other means to volatilize
contaminants.
Multi-Phase Extraction (MPE) "is an enhancement of the traditional SVE system. Unlike SVE,
MPE simultaneously extracts both groundwater and soil vapor. The groundwater table is lowered
in order to dewater the saturated zone so that the SVE process can be applied to the newly exposed
soil. This allows the volatile compounds sorbed on the previously saturated soil to be stripped by
the induced vapor flow and extracted. In addition, soluble VOCs present in the extracted
groundwater are also removed" (EPA, 1997b). "[MPE] systems can be implemented to target all
phases of contamination associated with a typical NAPL spill site. These systems remove residual
vadose zone soil contamination residing in soil gas, dissolved in soil pore-space moisture, and
adsorbed to soil particles. [MPE] also effectively removes dissolved and free-phase (both light and
dense NAPL [LNAPL and DNAPL]) contamination in groundwater" (EPA, 1997a). Dual-phase
extraction and bioslurping are types of MPE.
Physical Separation processes use physical properties to separate contaminated and
uncontaminated media, or separate different types of media. For example, different-sized sieves
and screens can be used to separate contaminated soil from relatively uncontaminated debris.
Another application of physical separation is the dewatering of sediments or sludge. Physical
separation is included as treatment because it reduces the volume of contaminated material.
JULY 2017
A-6
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Recycling is the process of collecting and processing materials that would otherwise require
disposal and turning them into new products. Examples include recycling recovered oil and
solvents.
Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) "extracts vapors from the soil above the water table by applying a
vacuum to pull the vapors out....SVE involves drilling one or more extraction wells into the
contaminated soil to a depth above the water table, which must be deeper than 3 feet below the
ground surface. Attached to the wells is equipment (such as a blower or vacuum pump) that creates
a vacuum. The vacuum pulls air and vapors through the soil and up the well to the ground surface
for treatment" (EPA, 2012i). SVE usually is performed in situ; however, in some cases, it can be
used as an ex situ technology.
Soil Washing "is a process that uses physical and/or chemical techniques to separate contaminants
from soil and sediments. Contaminants are concentrated into a much smaller volume of
contaminated residue, which is either recycled or disposed. Washwater can consist of water only or
can include additives such as acids, bases, surfactants, solvents, chelating or sequestering agents
which are utilized to enhance the separation of contaminants from soils or sediments" (ITRC,
1997). "Hazardous contaminants tend to bind, chemically or physically, to silt and clay. Silt and
clay, in turn, bind to sand and gravel particles. The soil washing process separates the
contaminated fine soil (silt and clay) from the coarse soil (sand and gravel). When completed, the
smaller volume of soil, which contains the majority of the fine silt and clay particles, can be further
treated by other methods (such as incineration or bioremediation) or disposed of according to
state and federal regulations" (EPA, 1996).
Solidification and Stabilization (SIS) "refer[s] to a group of cleanup methods that prevent or slow
the release of harmful chemicals from wastes, such as contaminated soil, sediment, and sludge.
These methods usually do not destroy the contaminants. Instead, they keep them from 'leaching'
above safe levels into the surrounding environment....[Solidification and stabilization] are often
used together to prevent people and wildlife from being exposed to contaminants, particularly
metals and radioactive contaminants....
"Solidification involves mixing a waste with a binding agent, which is a substance that makes loose
materials stick together. Common binding agents include cement, asphalt, fly ash, and clay. Water
must be added to most mixtures for binding to occur; then the mixture is allowed to dry and
harden to form a solid block.
"Similar to solidification, stabilization also involves mixing wastes with binding agents. However,
the binding agents also cause a chemical reaction with contaminants to make them less likely to be
released into the environment. For example, when soil contaminated with metals is mixed with
water and lime — a white powder produced from limestone — a reaction changes the metals into a
form that will not dissolve in water" (EPA, 2012j). Stabilization remedies are classified as S/S
whether or not they ultimately involve solidification.
S/S may be performed either ex situ or in situ. Note that chemical agents added in situ for the
purpose of binding with contaminants in groundwater (as opposed to soil) is classified as in situ
chemical treatment, not S/S.
JULY 2017
A-7
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Solvent Extraction uses an organic solvent as an extractant to separate contaminants from soil.
The organic solvent is mixed with contaminated soil in an extraction unit. The extracted solution
then is passed through a separator, where the contaminants and extractant are separated from the
soil.
A. 1.4 Thermal Tneatment
Thermal treatment uses heat to separate contaminants from contaminated media by increasing
their mobility. Thermal treatment includes volatility; destroying contaminants or contaminated
media by burning, decomposing, or detonating the contaminants or the contaminated media; or
immobilizing contaminants by melting and solidifying the contaminated media.
Electrical Resistance Heating (ERH) "delivers an electrical current between metal rods called
'electrodes' installed underground. The heat generated as movement of the current meets
resistance from soil converts groundwater and water in soil into steam, vaporizing contaminants"
(EPA, 2012f). A low-energy ERH approach raises the subsurface temperatures to approximately 30
to 60°C to enhance the rate of biotic and abiotic contaminant dechlorination, respectively.
(ESTCP Project ER-200719, Combining Low-Energy Electrical Resistance Heating with Biotic and
Abiotic Reactions for Treatment of Chlorinated Solvent DNAPL Source Areas). A type of In Situ
Thermal Treatment.
Incineration "is the process of burning hazardous materials at temperatures high enough to destroy
contaminants. Incineration is conducted in an 'incinerator,' which is a type of furnace designed
for burning hazardous materials in a combustion chamber....Hazardous materials must be
excavated or pumped into containers before incineration. They may require further preparation,
such as grinding or removing large rocks and debris, or removing excess water. The materials are
then placed in the combustion chamber of an incinerator where they are heated to an extremely
high temperature for a specified period of time. The temperature and length of time depend on
the types of wastes and contaminants present. Air or pure oxygen may be added to the chamber to
supply the oxygen needed for burning....Depending on the contaminants present, the target
temperature may range from 1,600 to 2,500°F [870 to 1,370 °C]....
"As the wastes heat up, the contaminants volatilize (change into gases) and most are destroyed.
Gases that are not destroyed pass through a secondary combustion chamber for further heating
and destruction. The resulting gases then pass though air pollution control equipment....
"Incinerators can be constructed for temporary use at the site. However, in recent years, it has
been more common for the wastes to be loaded onto trucks for transport to a permanent offsite
facility. EPA requires that an incinerator can destroy and remove at least 99.99 percent of each
harmful chemical in the waste it processes. When some extremely harmful chemicals are present,
EPA requires that an incinerator show it can destroy and remove at least 99.9999 percent of
contaminants in the waste" (EPA, 2012g).
In Situ Thermal Treatment (ISTT) "methods heat contaminated soil, and sometimes nearby
groundwater, to very high temperatures. The heat vaporizes (evaporates) the chemicals and water
changing them into gases... [which] can move more easily through soil. The heating process can
make it easier to remove NAPLs from both soil and groundwater. High temperatures also can
JULY 2017
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
destroy some chemicals in the area being heated....The chemical and water vapors are pulled to
collection wells and brought to the ground surface by applying a vacuum [that is, SVE]" (EPA,
2012f). Lower energy ISTT (see ERH) can enhance biotic or abiotic contaminant destruction.
Specific types of ISTT techniques include conductive heating, electrical resistive heating, radio
frequency heating, hot air injection, hot water injection, and steam enhanced extraction.
In Situ Thermal Desorption — See In Situ Thermal Treatment.
Open Burn (OB) and Open Detonation (OD) operations "are conducted to destroy excess,
obsolete, or unserviceable (EOU) munitions and energetic materials. In OB operations, energetics
or munitions are destroyed by self-sustained combustion, which is ignited by an external source,
such as a flame, heat, or a detonation wave...In OD operations, detonatable explosives and
munitions are destroyed by detonation, which is generally initiated by the detonation of an
energetic charge" (FRTR, 2007).
Steam Enhanced Extraction (SEE) "injects steam underground by pumping it through wells drilled
in the contaminated area. The steam heats the area and mobilizes and evaporates contaminants"
(EPA, 2012f). SEE is a type of In Situ Thermal Treatment.
Thermal Conduction Heating (TCH) "uses heaters placed in underground steel pipes. TCH can
heat the contaminated area hot enough to destroy some chemicals" (EPA, 2012f). TCH is a type of
In Situ Thermal Treatment.
Thermal Desorption "removes organic contaminants from soil, sludge or sediment by heating
them in a machine called a 'thermal desorber' to evaporate the contaminants. Evaporation changes
the contaminants into vapors (gases) and separates them from the solid material... A thermal
desorber is not the same as an incinerator, which heats contaminated materials to temperatures
high enough to destroy the contaminants.... Thermal desorption involves excavating soil or other
contaminated material for treatment in a thermal desorber. The desorber may be assembled at the
site for onsite treatment, or the material may be loaded into trucks and transported to an offsite
thermal desorption facility. To prepare the soil for treatment, large rocks or debris first must be
removed or crushed....If the material is very wet, the water may need to be removed to improve
treatment....
"The prepared soil is placed in the thermal desorber to be heated. Low-temperature thermal
desorption is used to heat the solid material to 200-600°F [90 to 320°C] to treat VOCs. If SVOCs
are present, then high-temperature thermal desorption is used to heat the soil to 600-1000°F [320
to 540°C].
"Gas collection equipment captures the contaminated vapors. Vapors often require further
treatment, such as removing dust particles. The remaining organic vapors are usually destroyed
using a thermal oxidizer, which heats the vapors to temperatures high enough to convert them to
carbon dioxide and water vapor...
"Often, treated soil can be used to fill in the excavation at the site. If the treated soil contains
contaminants that do not evaporate, such as most metals, they may be disposed of and capped
onsite, or transported offsite to an appropriate landfill" (EPA, 2012k). Thermal desorption is an ex
JULY 2017
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
situ treatment process. In situ thermal desorption processes are previously discussed as In Situ
Thermal Treatment.
Thermally-Enhanced SVE — See In Situ Thermal Treatment.
Vitrification is a thermal treatment process that converts contaminated soil to stable glass and
crystalline solids. There are two methods for producing heat for melting the contaminated soil.
The older method uses electrodes and electrical resistance to vitrify materials, while the emerging
technique uses plasma arc technology.
"In the electrical resistance method, high voltage is applied to electrodes (typically four) placed in
the soil. Starter frit (generally graphite) is placed on the soil surface and electrical current heats the
soil from the top down to temperatures between 1,400 and 2,000°C [2,550 to 3,650°F].... If the
silica content of the soil is sufficiently high, contaminated soil can be converted into glass. Heating
vaporizes or pyrolyzes organic contaminants. Most inorganic contaminants are encased in the glass-
like monolith that results when the soil cools after treatment" (EPA, 2006). Vitrification may be
conducted in situ or ex situ.
A. 1.5 Pump and Treat (P&T)
Pump and treat "is a common method for cleaning up groundwater [and other aqueous media]
contaminated with dissolved chemicals, including industrial solvents, metals, and fuel oil. [Water
is extracted and conveyed] to an above-ground treatment system that removes the contaminants.
(P&T) systems also are used to 'contain' the contaminant plume. Containment of the plume keeps
[the plume] from spreading by pumping contaminated water toward the wells. This pumping helps
keep contaminants from reaching drinking water wells, wetlands, streams, and other natural
resources" (EPA, 2012h). For the purpose of this report, all P&T systems are considered
treatment, even if designed to only contain, rather than restore, a contaminated plume.
Activated Carbon Treatment — "Activated carbon is a material used to filter harmful chemicals
from contaminated water and air. It is composed of black granules of coal, wood, nutshells or
other carbon-rich materials. As contaminated water or air flows through activated carbon, the
contaminants sorb (stick) to the surface of the granules and are removed from the water or air.
Granular activated carbon or 'GAC' can treat a wide range of contaminant vapors including radon
and contaminants dissolved in groundwater, such as fuel oil, solvents, polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs), dioxins, and other industrial chemicals, as well as radon and other radioactive materials. It
even removes low levels of some types of metals from groundwater.
"Activated carbon treatment generally consists of one or more columns or tanks filled with GAC.
Contaminated water or vapors are usually pumped through a column from the top down, but
upward flow is possible. As the contaminated water or air flows through the GAC, the
contaminants sorb to the outer and inner surfaces of the granules. The water and air exiting the
container will be cleaner. Regular testing of exiting water or air is conducted to check contaminant
levels. If testing shows that some contaminants remain, the water or air may need to be treated
again to meet the treatment levels.
"The GAC will need to be replaced when the available surfaces on the granules are taken up by
contaminants and additional contaminants can no longer sorb to them. The 'spent' GAC may be
JULY 2017
A-10
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
replaced with fresh GAC or 'regenerated' to remove the sorbed contaminants. To regenerate spent
GAC, it is usually sent to an offsite facility where it is heated to very high temperatures to destroy
the contaminants. If a lot of GAC needs to be regenerated, equipment to heat the GAC and
remove the sorbed contaminants can be brought to the site.
"Depending on the site, treated groundwater may be pumped into a nearby stream or river or back
underground through injection wells or trenches. At some sites, a sprinkler system can distribute
the water over the ground surface so that it seeps into soil. The water also may be discharged to the
public sewer system for further treatment at a sewage treatment plant" (EPA, 2012a).
Air Stripping "is the process of moving air through contaminated groundwater or surface water in
an above-ground treatment system. Air stripping removes chemicals called 'volatile organic
compounds' or 'VOCs.' VOCs are chemicals that easily evaporate, which means they can change
from a liquid to a vapor (a gas). The air passing through contaminated water helps evaporate
VOCs faster. After treating the water, the air and chemical vapors are collected, and the vapors are
either removed or vented outside if VOC levels are low enough. Air stripping is commonly used to
treat groundwater as part of the 'pump and treat' cleanup method....
"Air stripping uses either an air stripper or aeration tank to force air through contaminated water
and evaporate VOCs. The most common type of air stripper is a packed-column air stripper, which
is a tall tank filled with pieces of plastic, steel, or ceramic packing material.
"Contaminated water is pumped above ground and into the top of the tank and sprayed over the
top of the packing material. The water trickles downward through the spaces between the packing
material, forming a thin film of water that increases its exposure to air blown in at the bottom of
the tank. A sieve-tray air stripper is similar in design but contains several trays with small holes. As
water flows across the trays, a fan at the bottom blows air upwards through the holes, increasing air
exposure. Aeration tanks are another type of design that remove VOCs by bubbling air into a tank
of contaminated water" (EPA, 2012b).
Filtration "is the physical process of mechanical separation based on particle size whereby particles
suspended in a fluid are separated by forcing the fluid through a porous medium. As fluid passes
through the medium, the suspended particles are trapped on the surface of the medium and/or
within the body of the medium. Ultrafiltration/microfiltration occurs when particles are separated
by forcing fluid through a semipermeable membrane. Only the particles whose size are smaller
than the openings of the membrane are allowed to flow through" (FRTR, 2007). Other filtration
methods include nanofiltration and reverse osmosis.
Ion Exchange "removes ions from the aqueous phase by the exchange of cations or anions between
the contaminants and the exchange medium. Ion exchange materials may consist of resins made
from synthetic organic materials that contain ionic functional groups to which exchangeable ions
are attached. They also may be inorganic and natural polymeric materials. After the resin capacity
has been exhausted, resins can be regenerated for re-use" (FRTR, 2007).
Metals Precipitation "from contaminated water involves the conversion of soluble heavy metal
salts to insoluble salts that will precipitate. The precipitate can then be removed from the treated
water by physical methods such as clarification (settling) and/or filtration. The process usually uses
JULY 2017
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
pH adjustment, addition of a chemical precipitant, and flocculation. Typically, metals precipitate
from the solution as hydroxides, sulfides, or carbonates. The solubilities of the specific metal
contaminants and the required cleanup standards will dictate the process used. In some cases,
process design will allow for the generation of sludges that can be sent to recyclers for metal
recovery" (FRTR, 2007).
A.2 On-Site Containment Technologies
For the purpose of this report, containment includes several containment technologies, including
caps, covers, and vertical engineered barriers.
Caps and Cover Systems — "Capping involves placing a cover over contaminated material such as
landfill waste or contaminated soil.... Caps do not destroy or remove contaminants. Instead, they
isolate them and keep them in place to avoid the spread of contamination....The cap design
selected for a site will depend on several factors, including the types and concentrations of
contaminants present, the size of the site, the amount of rainfall the area receives, and the future
use of the property. Construction of a cap can be as simple as placing a single layer of a material
over lightly contaminated soil to placing several layers of different materials to isolate more highly
contaminated wastes. For example, an asphalt cap might be selected to cover low levels of soil
contamination on a property whose future reuse requires a parking lot. A cap for a hazardous
waste landfill, however, might require several layers, including a vegetative layer, drainage layer,
geomembrane, and clay layer" (EPA, 2012c).
Cap (In situ) for sediment refers to "the placement of a subaqueous covering or cap of clean
material over contaminated sediment that remains in place. Caps are generally constructed of
granular material, such as clean sediment, sand, or gravel" (EPA, 2005).
Containment Cell (subaqueous), for sediment also referred to as contained aquatic disposal
(CAD), "is a type of subaqueous capping in which the dredged sediment is placed into a natural or
excavated depression elsewhere in the water body. A related form of disposal, known as level
bottom capping, places the dredged sediment on a level bottom elsewhere in the water body,
where it is capped. [CAD] has been used for navigational dredging projects (e.g., Boston Harbor,
Providence River), but has been rarely considered for environmental dredging projects. However,
there may be instances when neither dredging with land disposal nor capping contaminated
sediment in-situ is feasible, and it may be appropriate to evaluate CADs. The depression used in
the case of a CAD should provide lateral containment of the contaminated material, and also
should have the advantage of requiring less maintenance and being more resistant to erosion than
level-bottom capping" (EPA, 2005).
Containment Cell (upland, adjacent) for sediment refers to containment in a confined disposal
facility (CDF) either upland or adjacent to the water body. "CDFs are engineered structures
enclosed by dikes and designed to retain dredged material. They may be located upland (above the
water table), partially in the water near shore, or completely surrounded by water. A CDF may
have a large cell for material disposal, and adjoining cells for retention and decantation of turbid,
supernatant water. A variety of linings have been used to prevent seepage through the dike walls.
The most effective are clay or bentonite-cement slurries, but sand, soil, and sediment linings have
also been used... Caps are the most effective way to minimize contaminant loss from CDFs, but
JULY 2017
A-12
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
selection of proper liner material is also an important control in CDFs. Finally, CDFs require
continuous monitoring to ensure structural integrity." (EPA, 1991b).
Evapotranspiration (ET) Covers are alternatives to conventional cap and cover systems. "ET cover
systems are designed to rely on the ability of a soil layer to store the precipitation until it is
naturally evaporated or is transpired by the vegetative cover. In this respect they differ from more
conventional cover designs in that they rely on obtaining an appropriate water storage capacity in
the soil rather than...engineered low hydraulic conductivity [barrier components]. ET cover system
designs are based on using the hydrological processes (water balance components) at a site, which
include the water storage capacity of the soil, precipitation, surface runoff, evapotranspiration, and
infiltration. The greater the storage capacity and evapotranspirative properties are, the lower the
potential for percolation through the cover system" (EPA, 2011).
Vertical Engineered Barriers (VEB) are "[walls] built below ground to control the flow of
groundwater. VEBs may be used to divert the direction of contaminated groundwater flow to keep
it from reaching drinking water wells, wetlands, or streams. They also may be used to contain and
isolate contaminated soil and groundwater to keep them from mixing with clean groundwater.
VEBs differ from permeable reactive barriers in that they do not clean up contaminated
groundwater" (EPA, 2012m). Common types of VEBs include slurry walls and sheet pile walls.
A.3 Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA)
MNA is "the reliance on natural attenuation processes (within the context of a carefully controlled
and monitored site cleanup approach) to achieve site-specific remediation objectives within a
timeframe that is reasonable compared to that offered by other more active methods. The 'natural
attenuation processes' that are at work in such a remediation approach include a variety of
physical, chemical, or biological processes that, under favorable conditions, act without human
intervention to reduce the mass, toxicity, mobility, volume, or concentration of contaminants in
soil or groundwater. These in situ processes include biodegradation; dispersion; dilution; sorption;
volatilization; radioactive decay; and chemical or biological stabilization, transformation, or
destruction of contaminants. When relying on natural attenuation processes for site remediation,
EPA prefers those processes that degrade or destroy contaminants. Also, EPA generally expects
that MNA will only be appropriate for sites that have a low potential for contaminant migration"
(EPA, 1999b).
A.4 Monitored Natural Recovery (MNR) for Sediment
Sediment MNR "[relies] on a wide range of naturally occurring processes to reduce risk [from
contaminated sediments] to human and/or ecological receptors. These processes may include
physical, biological, and chemical mechanisms that act together to reduce the risk posed by the
contaminants....Natural processes that reduce toxicity through transformation or reduce
bioavailability through increased sorption are usually preferable as a basis for remedy selection to
mechanisms that reduce exposure through natural burial or mixing-in-place because the
destructive/sorptive mechanisms generally have a higher degree of permanence. However, many
contaminants that remain in sediment are not easily transformed or destroyed. For this reason,
risk reduction due to natural burial through sedimentation is more common and can be an
acceptable sediment management option. Dispersion is the least preferable basis for remedy
JULY 2017
A-13
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
selection based on MNR. While dispersion may reduce risk in the source area, it generally
increases exposure to contaminants and may result in unacceptable risks to downstream areas or
other receiving water bodies....
"The key difference between MNA for ground water and MNR for sediment is in the type of
processes most often being relied upon to reduce risk. Transformation of contaminants is usually
the major attenuating process for contaminated groundwater; however, these processes are
frequently too slow for the persistent contaminants of concern in sediment to provide for
remediation in a reasonable timeframe. Therefore, isolation and mixing of contaminants through
natural sedimentation is the process most frequently relied upon for contaminated sediment"
(EPA, 2005).
A.5 Enhanced Monitored Natural Recovery (EMNR) for Sediment
Natural recovery combined with an engineering approach is called Enhanced Monitored Natural
Recovery. "In some areas, natural recovery may appear to be the most appropriate remedy, yet the
rate of sedimentation or other natural processes is insufficient to reduce risks within an acceptable
timeframe. Where this is the case, project managers may consider accelerating the recovery process
by engineering means, for example by the addition of a thin layer of clean sediment. This approach
is sometimes referred to as 'thin-layer placement' or 'particle broadcasting.' Thin-layer placement
normally accelerates natural recovery by adding a layer of clean sediment over contaminated
sediment. The acceleration can occur through several processes, including increased dilution
through bioturbation of clean sediment mixed with underlying contaminants. Thin-layer
placement is typically different than...isolation caps...because it is not designed to provide long-
term isolation of contaminants from benthic organisms. While thickness of an isolation cap can
range up to several feet, the thickness of the material used in thin layer placement could be as little
as a few inches....Clean sediment can be placed in a uniform thin layer over the contaminated area
or it can be placed in berms or windrows, allowing natural sediment transport processes to
distribute the clean sediment to the desired areas.
"Project managers might also consider the addition of flow control structures to enhance
deposition in certain areas of a site" (EPA, 2005).
Note that a layer of clean sediment placed as backfill following dredging or excavation is not
considered EMNR.
A.6 Vapor Intrusion Mitigation
Vapor intrusion is the term given to migration of vapor-forming chemicals from any underground
source into a structure (e.g., homes, businesses, schools) (EPA, 2015a). For example, vapors can
enter buildings as a component of soil gas by migrating through cracks, seams, interstices, and gaps
in basement floors, walls, or foundations ("adventitious openings") or through intentional
openings (e.g., perforations due to utility conduits, sump pits) (EPA, 2015a).
As used in this document, mitigation refers to "interim actions taken to reduce or eliminate
human exposure to vapor-forming chemicals in a specific building arising from the vapor intrusion
pathway" (EPA, 2015a). Functionally, mitigation methods can be categorized into two basic
strategies: (i) those that seek to prevent or reduce vapor entry into a building (e.g., active
JULY 2017
A-14
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
depressurization technologies, positive building pressurization, sealing cracks and openings); and
those that seek to reduce or eliminate vapors that have entered into a building (e.g., indoor air
treatment, interior ventilation). Neither strategy entails reducing the level of vapor-forming
contamination in the subsurface source, which refers to remediation.
Active Depressurization Technology "creates a driving force for air flow from the building into
the subsurface by lowering the pressure below the slab, thereby reducing vapor intrusion (soil gas
entry into a building)" (EPA, 2015a). This approach is the most thoroughly studied and
demonstrated approach for mitigating vapor intrusion. This approach consists of a group of
methods that site teams can customize to treat different construction features of a building,
including sub-slab depressurization (SSD), drain tile depressurization, wall depressurization,
baseboard depressurization, and sub-membrane depressurization (EPA, 2015a).
Interior Ventilation — Increasing building ventilation (i.e., increasing the rate at which
indoor air is replaced with outdoor air) can reduce the buildup of vapor-forming chemicals
within a structure. "Natural ventilation may be accomplished by opening windows, doors,
and vents. Forced or mechanical ventilation may be accomplished by using a fan to blow
air into or out of the building" (EPA, 2015a). Exhausting air from the building will
generally contribute to under-pressurization of the building, relative to the subsurface,
thereby potentially resulting in an increased rate of soil gas entry (i.e., vapor intrusion),
which could lead to higher levels of vapors in indoor air unless ambient air entry into the
building is increased disproportionately.
Passive Barrier (Impermeable Membrane) Installation involves "placing sheets of
'geomembrane' or strong plastic beneath a building to prevent vapor entry. Vapor barriers
are best installed during building construction, but can be installed in existing buildings
that have crawl spaces" (EPA, 20121). Spray-on vapor barriers (rubberized asphalt emulsions
or epoxy) may also be used (EPA, 2008a).
Passive Soil Depressurization is designed to achieve lower sub-slab air pressure relative to
indoor air pressure by use of a vent pipe routed through the conditioned space of a
building and venting to the outdoor air, thereby relying solely on the convective flow of air
upward in the vent to draw air from beneath the slab" (EPA, 2008a).
Positive Building Pressurization "involves adjusting the building's heating, ventilation, and
air-conditioning [HVAC] system to increase the pressure indoors relative to the sub-slab
area. This method is typically used for office buildings and other large structures" (EPA,
20121).
Sealing Cracks and Openings involves filling in adventitious and intentional openings in
the building foundation using products such as synthetic rubbers, acrylics, oil-based
sealants, asphalt/bituminous products, swelling cement, silicon, epoxy or elastomeric
polymers (EPA, 2015a). In addition, "[c]oncrete can be poured over unfinished dirt floors"
(EPA, 20121).
Soil Pressurization systems "are used to push air into the soil or venting layer below the
slab instead of pulling it out. The intention is to increase the sub-slab air pressure above
JULY 2017
A-15
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
ambient levels, forcing soil gas from the subsurface to the sides of the building." (ITRC,
2007)
Sub-slab Ventilation refers to engineered controls that function by diluting the vapor
concentrations beneath the slab and foundation (EPA, 2008a) by drawing outside air into
and through the sub-slab area. When installed during building construction, sub-slab
ventilation systems "typically consist of: a venting layer (e.g., filled with porous media such
as sand or pea gravel; or suitably fabricated with continuous voids) below a floor slab to
allow soil gas to move laterally to a collection piping system for discharge to the
atmosphere; and a sub-slab liner that is installed on top of the venting layer to reduce entry
points for vapor intrusion" (EPA, 2015a).
A.7 Other or Unspecified Remedies
Alternative Water Supply Remedy - "In CERCLA, section 101(34) states that '[t]he term
'alternative water supplies' includes, but is not limited to, drinking water and household water
supplies.' Also, CERCLA section 118 states that in taking response actions, the President [EPA]
shall 'give a high priority to facilities where the release of hazardous substances or pollutants or
contaminants has resulted in the closing of drinking water wells or has contaminated a principal
drinking water supply.'...Providing an alternative supply of water to affected users generally is
designed to prevent residents from being exposed to contaminated groundwater....Providing an
alternative water supply may involve furnishing clean, drinkable water on a permanent or
temporary basis. For example, providing a permanent supply of drinking water may include
installing a private well, connecting to a municipal water system, drilling of a new community
water supply well, or reinstating a previously contaminated water supply well once the groundwater
has been cleaned up. Examples of providing a temporary supply of water may involve installing
individual treatment units or delivering bottled water. When a [Superfund] response action that
provides an alternative water supply involves connecting hundreds of homes to a municipal system
(i.e., a residential connection to a water purveyor), it generally means that [residents are connected]
to a water supply line that is located relatively close by" (EPA, 2010).
Fracturing for Site Cleanup — "Fracturing creates or enlarges openings in bedrock or dense soil,
such as clay, to help soil and groundwater cleanup methods work better. The openings, called
"fractures," become pathways through which contaminants in soil and groundwater can be treated
in situ (in place, underground) or removed for above-ground treatment. Although fractures can
occur naturally in soil and rock, they are not always wide or long enough to easily reach
underground contamination using cleanup methods. Fracturing can enlarge the cracks and create
new ones to improve the speed and effectiveness of the cleanup" (EPA, 2012d).
Fracturing for site cleanup is different from fracturing to recover oil and gas. "Oil and gas
hydraulic fracturing is used to stimulate the recovery of oil or natural gas from underground
geologic formations. Oil and gas hydraulic fracturing works by pumping a mixture of fluids and
other substances into the target formation to create and enlarge fractures. Such operations are
much larger, use different equipment and chemical additives, occur at greater depths, and use
higher volumes of fluid than fracturing for site cleanup. Fracturing to clean up a contaminated site
rarely exceeds a depth of 100 feet, and the affected area around the fracturing well usually is less
JULY 2017
A-16
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
than 100 feet in any direction. However, wells to extract oil and gas often are drilled hundreds or
thousands of feet downward and sometimes horizontally into the oil- or gas-bearing rock. Fractures
may extend over 500 feet from these wells" (EPA, 2012d).
Institutional Controls (ICs) are defined by EPA as "non-engineered instruments, such as
administrative and legal controls, that help to minimize the potential for human exposure to
contamination and/or protect the integrity of a response action. ICs typically are designed to work
by limiting land and/or resource use or by providing information that helps modify or guide
human behavior at a site. ICs are a subset of Land Use Controls (LUCs). LUCs include
engineering and physical barriers, such as fences and security guards, as well as ICs" (EPA, 2012n).
Some common examples of ICs include zoning restrictions, building or excavation permits, well
drilling prohibitions, easements, and covenants.
Soil Amendments — "Many soils, particularly those found in urban, industrial, mining, and other
disturbed areas, suffer from a range of physical, chemical, and biological limitations. They include
soil toxicity, too high or too low pH, lack of sufficient organic matter, reduced water-holding
capacity, reduced microbial communities, and compaction. Appropriate soil amendments may be
inorganic (e.g., liming materials), organic (e.g., composts) or mixtures (e.g., lime-stabilized
biosolids). When specified and applied properly, these beneficial soil amendments may limit many
of the exposure pathways and reduce soil phytotoxicity. Soil amendments also can restore
appropriate soil conditions for plant growth by balancing pH, adding organic matter, restoring soil
microbial activity, increasing moisture retention, and reducing compaction." (EPA, 2007).
Wetlands Replacement — "Compensatory mitigation is required to replace the loss of wetland and
aquatic resource functions in [a] watershed. Compensatory mitigation refers to the restoration,
establishment, enhancement, or in certain circumstances preservation of wetlands, streams or
other aquatic resources for the purpose of offsetting unavoidable adverse impacts [from a specific
project (EPA, 2008c). For the purposes of this report, mitigation performed at the site of the
adverse impacts is excluded from the definition of wetlands replacement. For mitigation
performed at the site of adverse impacts, see Wetlands Restoration. For wetlands constructed as a
form of treatment, see Constructed Treatment Wetlands.
Wetlands Restoration is defined as "[r]e-establishment or rehabilitation of a wetland or other
aquatic resource with a goal of returning natural or historic functions and characteristics to a
former or degraded wetland" (EPA, 2008c). For the purposes of this report, restoration conducted
at a location other than the impacted site is excluded from the definition of wetlands restoration,
and is instead considered Wetlands Replacement. For wetlands constructed as a form of
treatment, see Constructed Treatment Wetlands.
JULY 2017
A-17
-------
Appendix B
TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY FISCAL YEAR
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Appendix B: Treatment Technologies by Fiscal Year
Type
Remedy
82-85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
Total
Acid Extraction
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
Bioremediation
1
3
2
6
9
4
5
9
8
6
6
6
1
4
9
3
0
3
2
3
1
0
3
0
2
1
1
0
0
1
99
Chemical Treatment
1
0
0
1
5
0
4
2
4
0
3
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
0
1
3
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
40
Constructed Treatment Wetland
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
0
0
1
6
Incineration
2
2
1
2
4
0
0
0
6
1
2
3
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25
Incineration (off-site)
12
8
3
9
10
9
16
7
13
7
10
7
5
5
6
2
2
3
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
2
0
0
140
Incineration (on-site)
3
5
8
12
12
18
6
4
5
2
4
3
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
85
a)
Mechanical Soil Aeration
1
2
2
2
3
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
Neutralization
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
4
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
13
a)
Open Burn and Open Detonation
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
aj
Physical Separation
15
9
7
20
19
20
33
24
20
7
17
15
11
18
15
8
8
9
12
9
9
8
4
5
14
9
10
9
6
12
382
o
i/i
Recycling
1
2
2
7
4
9
9
12
11
5
4
10
3
3
6
3
1
5
2
5
6
5
2
0
4
2
3
3
4
5
138
Soil Vapor Extraction
1
0
1
3
0
2
0
0
0
10
2
3
1
0
2
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
30
on
Soil Washing
0
1
1
2
3
9
2
4
2
0
3
1
1
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
33
Solidification/Stabilization
2
8
10
16
17
15
26
31
22
5
8
9
8
8
10
8
1
10
8
11
4
15
5
10
8
5
5
2
1
2
290
Source P&T
12
6
4
18
5
7
12
13
7
4
6
3
2
4
4
1
1
5
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
0
128
Thermal Desorption
0
0
0
1
1
5
8
1
4
3
6
8
1
7
5
1
1
2
1
1
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
60
Thermal Treatment
0
2
3
8
6
5
4
2
3
2
4
2
1
2
2
5
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
57
Unspecified Ex Situ Treatment
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
Unspecified Ex Situ Treatment (off-site)
4
2
1
0
5
8
4
2
2
5
4
3
3
2
5
5
1
6
1
5
3
2
1
4
3
3
6
2
0
5
97
Unspecified Ex Situ Treatment (on-site)
2
2
2
2
4
1
1
1
6
1
3
2
2
1
2
1
0
1
1
2
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
4
0
2
46
Total
58
52
47
109
107
115
135
119
115
58
85
79
42
62
72
41
21
50
29
41
33
35
18
22
35
25
29
26
16
29
1705
Bioremediation
0
0
1
4
2
2
2
7
4
6
9
11
4
12
10
3
3
3
1
1
3
5
3
1
2
2
2
1
2
4
110
Cap (amended, insitu)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
1
5
Chemical Treatment
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
2
2
2
4
7
4
3
3
6
38
a)
Constructed Treatment Wetland
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
E
Flushing
1
0
2
4
6
3
6
3
3
2
0
1
1
0
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
40
a)
Fracturi ng
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
3
aj
Multi-phase Extraction
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
o
Phytoremediation
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
8
=>
Soil Amendments
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
2
1
0
1
1
9
on
Soil Vapor Extraction
0
0
3
9
16
15
31
18
18
7
11
22
17
12
10
6
8
11
12
8
7
7
7
8
7
7
10
2
6
6
301
-
Solidification/Stabilization
4
0
3
5
5
6
7
12
9
8
9
12
10
19
4
6
4
5
3
3
5
6
3
4
4
4
3
2
3
2
170
Thermal Treatment
0
1
2
1
5
6
5
2
11
5
6
3
6
1
5
4
1
0
0
1
4
3
2
2
3
4
0
4
3
3
93
Unspecified In Situ Treatment
1
0
1
2
0
3
1
0
1
2
3
0
0
0
1
1
1
3
0
1
2
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
26
Total
6
1
13
25
34
36
53
42
46
30
38
49
38
46
36
23
18
22
16
15
23
25
19
21
25
27
21
13
21
24
806
+-» ^
« S £
i £ '8
Unspecified Treatment (on-site)
8
3
3
8
2
5
6
8
4
2
3
0
3
5
4
4
2
3
2
4
1
2
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
86
to aj c
Unspecified Source Treatment
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
Total
8
3
3
9
2
5
6
9
4
2
3
0
3
5
4
4
2
3
2
4
2
2
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
89
Air Sparging
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
4
3
6
6
12
8
9
7
5
6
2
2
5
2
1
1
7
3
1
1
2
2
96
Bioremediation
1
1
1
1
6
5
5
6
4
6
5
5
2
3
4
5
9
6
3
5
11
21
14
13
22
20
10
13
17
16
240
Chemical Treatment
0
0
1
0
1
2
2
2
0
0
3
0
0
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
7
10
13
5
6
10
10
15
9
13
113
-
Electrokinetics
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
"a
Flushing
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
Fracturi ng
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
5
o
In-well Air Stripping
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
1
9
ID
Multi-phase Extraction
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
2
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
2
0
17
i75
Permeable Reactive Barrier
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
1
0
1
4
0
2
3
1
2
5
3
4
1
1
1
3
4
0
4
3
46
—
Phytoremediation
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
2
1
0
1
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
12
Thermal Treatment
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
5
Unspecified In Situ Treatment
1
0
0
0
1
2
4
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
4
1
5
3
6
2
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
42
Vapor Extraction
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
1
1
3
2
9
4
5
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
2
0
1
2
0
0
0
38
Total
2
2
2
2
9
9
17
12
10
14
18
14
27
22
20
26
20
21
13
22
30
41
35
23
39
38
28
31
40
41
628
Ex Situ
Groundwater
Pump and Treat
48
42
37
76
66
92
115
74
76
74
62
57
49
32
39
45
32
31
13
23
32
23
27
22
20
13
14
15
13
9
1271
Data in Appendix B may vary from data presented in the SRR 14th Edition. EPA has updated the dataset to add remedy components for decision documents from the early years of the program that had
not previously been recorded and has updated older data to conform more readily to recently updated media and remedy categories.
JULY 2017
B-l
-------
Appendix C
Remedy Selection Summary Matrix FY 2012-2014
-------
Appendix C
Remedy Selection Summary Matrix, FY 2012-14
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Groundwater
Vapor
Intrusion
Site Name
OU Document Type Action ID FY
REGION 1
Connecticut
NEW LONDON SUBMARINE BASE 04 ROD 004 2012
X
X
X
SCOVILL INDUSTRIAL LANDFILL 01 ROD 001 2013
X
X
X
X
X
Massachusetts
INDUSTRI-PLEX 02 ESD 001 2014
X
X
X
NAVAL WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL RESERVE PLANT 01 ESD 001 2014
X
X
OTIS AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE/CAMP EDWARDS 05 ESD 006 2013
X
OTIS AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE/CAMP EDWARDS 07 ESD 007 2013
X
SOUTH WEYMOUTH NAVAL AIR STATION 04 ESD 005 2013
X
SOUTH WEYMOUTH NAVAL AIR STATION 09 ROD 009 2014
X
X
X
X
SOUTH WEYMOUTH NAVAL AIR STATION 11 ROD 011 2012
X
X
SOUTH WEYMOUTH NAVAL AIR STATION 14 ROD 014 2013
X
X
X
SOUTH WEYMOUTH NAVAL AIR STATION 25 ESD 003 2012
X
Maine
BRUNSWICK NAVAL AIR STATION 07 ESD 004 2014
X
CALLAHAN MINING CORP 01 ESD 001 2013
X
LORING AIR FORCE BASE 08 ESD 006 2014
X
PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD 04 ROD 004 2013
X
X
PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD 05 ROD 007 2013
X
X
PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD 07 ROD 008 2013
X
New Hampshire
FLETCHER'S PAINT WORKS & STORAGE 02 ROD 002 2012
X
KEARSARGE METALLURGICAL CORP. 01 ROD Amendment 001 2012
X
X
PEASE AIR FORCE BASE 07 ESD 001 2013
X
PEASE AIR FORCE BASE 07 ESD 002 2014
X
SOMERSWORTH SANITARY LANDFILL 01 ESD 001 2013
X
Rhode Island
CENTREDALE MANOR RESTORATION PROJECT 01 ROD 001 2012
X
X
X
X
X
X
DAVISVILLE NAVAL CONSTRUCTION BATTALION CENTER 09 ROD 008 2014
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER 02 ROD 007 2014
X
X
X
X
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER 03 ESD 002 2012
X
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER 05 ROD 006 2014
X
X
X
X
July 2017
C-
-------
Appendix C
Remedy Selection Summary Matrix, FY 2012-14
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER 06 ROD 008 2014
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER 07 ROD 009 2012
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER 11 ROD 012 2013
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER 12 ROD 013 2014
PETERSON/PURITAN, INC. 01 ESP 002 2013
New Jersey
AMERICAN CYANAMID CO 04 ROD 004 2012
BROOK INDUSTRIAL PARK 01 ESD 001 2013
CINNAMINSON TOWNSHIP (BLOCK 702) GROUND WATER
CONTAMINATION 02 ROD 006 2014
CORNELL DUBILIER ELECTRONICS INC. 03 ROD 003 2012
ELLIS PROPERTY 01 ROD Amendment 001 2013
EVOR PHILLIPS LEASING 03 ROD 003 2012
LCP CHEMICALS INC. 01 ROD 002 2014
MAYWOOD CHEMICAL CO. 01 ROD 001 2014
MAYWOOD CHEMICAL CO. 03 ROD 003 2012
NAVAL WEAPONS STATION EARLE (SITE A) 11 ROD Oil 2014
PICATINNY ARSENAL (USARMY) 15 ROD 052 2012
PICATINNY ARSENAL (USARMY) 20 ROD 064 2014
RADIATION TECHNOLOGY, INC. 03 ROD 005 2014
RARITAN BAY SLAG 01 ROD 001 2013
RINGWOOD MINES/LANDFILL 02 ROD 002 2014
SCIENTIFIC CHEMICAL PROCESSING 03 ROD 003 2012
SHIELDALLOYCORP. 02 ROD 005 2014
WHITE CHEMICAL CORP. 03 ROD 003 2012
WHITE SWAN LAUNDRY AND CLEANER INC. 01 ROD 001 2013
WOODBROOK ROAD DUMP 01 ROD 001 2013
New York
BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY (USDOE) 03 ESD 003 2012
CAYUGA GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION SITE 01 ROD 001 2013
CROWN CLEANERS OF WATERTOWN INC. 01 ROD 001 2012
DIAZ CHEMICAL 02 ROD 002 2012
July 2017
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
-= Q_
Groundwater
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
C-2
-------
Appendix C
Remedy Selection Summary Matrix, FY 2012-14
GOWANUS CANAL 01 ROD 001 2013
GRIFFISS AIR FORCE BASE (11 AREAS) 04 ROD 004 2012
GRIFFISS AIR FORCE BASE (11 AREAS) 07 ROD 030 2012
GRIFFISS AIR FORCE BASE (11 AREAS) 32 ROD 032 2012
GRIFFISS AIR FORCE BASE (11 AREAS) 40 ROD 040 2012
GRIFFISS AIR FORCE BASE (11 AREAS) 41 ROD 041 2012
HOOKER (HYDE PARK) 01 ESD 001 2012
LIBERTY INDUSTRIAL FINISHING 01 ROD Amendment 001 2012
LITTLE VALLEY 02 ESD 002 2014
MATTIACE PETROCHEMICAL CO., INC. 01 ROD Amendment 001 2014
NEW CASSEL/HICKSVILLE GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION 01 ROD 001 2013
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. (SARATOGA SPRINGS
PLANT) 02 ROD 002 2013
OLEAN WELL FIELD 02 ROD Amendment 002 2014
OLEAN WELL FIELD 03 ROD 007 2014
ONONDAGA LAKE 02 ESD 003 2014
ONONDAGA LAKE 25 ROD 021 2014
PLATTSBURGH AIR FORCE BASE 06 ROD 023 2014
PLATTSBURGH AIR FORCE BASE 20 ROD 022 2012
SHENANDOAH ROAD GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION 01 ROD 001 2012
SOLVENT SAVERS 01 ESD 002 2012
Puerto Rico
ATLANTIC FLEET WEAPONS TRAINING AREA 04 ROD 004 2014
CIDRAGROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION 01 ROD 002 2014
MAUNABO URBANO PUBLIC WELLS 01 ROD 001 2012
SCORPIO RECYCLING, INC. 02 ROD 002 2013
Maryland
68TH STREET DUMP/INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES 01 ROD 001 2013
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND (EDGEWOOD AREA) 29 ROD 032 2014
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND (EDGEWOOD AREA) 37 ROD 041 2012
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND (EDGEWOOD AREA) 48 ROD 051 2013
July 2017
Superfund Remedy Report,
15th Edition
Source
Groundwater
Vapor
Intrusion
In Situ Treatment
Ex Situ Treatment
Off site Disposal
On site Containment
Institutional Controls
Monitored Natural Recovery
Enahanced Monitored Natural
Recovery
NA/NFAOnly
Other
In Situ Treatment
Pump and Treat
Constructed Treatment Wetland
Monitored Natural Attenuation
Vertical Engineered Barrier
Institutional Controls
Alternative Water Supply
NA/NFAOnly
Other
Mitigation
Institutional Controls
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
C-3
-------
Appendix C
Remedy Selection Summary Matrix, FY 2012-14
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND (EDGEWOOD AREA) 49 ROD 054 2013
CURTIS BAY COAST GUARD YARD 04 ROD 004 2013
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE 09 ROD 010 2014
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE 13 ROD 013 2014
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE 17 ROD 017 2012
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE 18 ROD 018 2014
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE 20 ROD 020 2012
INDIAN HEAD NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER 03 ROD 002 2014
INDIAN HEAD NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER 07 ROD 013 2013
INDIAN HEAD NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER 21 ROD 020 2014
INDIAN HEAD NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER 24 ROD 023 2014
ORDNANCE PRODUCTS, INC. 01 ROD Amendment 001 2013
PATUXENT RIVER NAVAL AIR STATION 11 ROD 013 2014
PATUXENT RIVER NAVAL AIR STATION 18 ROD 025 2013
SPECTRON, INC. 01 ROD Amendment 001 2012
SPECTRON, INC. 02 ROD 002 2012
Pennsylvania
AVCO LYCOMING (WILLIAMSPORT DIVISION) 02 ESD 003 2012
BRESLUBE-PENN, INC. 01 ESD 001 2014
CHEM-FAB 01 ROD 002 2013
CROSSLEY FARM 03 ROD 004 2012
LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT (PDO AREA) 02 ROD 007 2014
LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT (SE AREA) 12 ROD 017 2012
LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT (SE AREA) 21 ROD 027 2012
LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT (SE AREA) 28 ROD 028 2014
LOWER DARBY CREEK AREA 01 ROD 001 2014
NORTH PENN -AREA 1 01 ESD 003 2012
SALFORD QUARRY 01 ROD 001 2013
SHARON STEEL CORP (FARRELL WORKS DISPOSAL AREA) 02 ROD 003 2014
STRASBURG LANDFILL 00 ESD 002 2012
WILLOW GROVE NAVAL AIR AND AIR RESERVE STATION 02 ROD 002 2012
Virginia
DEFENSE GENERAL SUPPLY CENTER (DLA) 06 ROD 009 2013 [
July 2017
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Source
Groundwater
Vapor
Intrusion
In Situ Treatment
Ex Situ Treatment
Off site Disposal
On site Containment
Institutional Controls
Monitored Natural Recovery
Enahanced Monitored Natural
Recovery
NA/NFA Only
Other
In Situ Treatment
Pump and Treat
Constructed Treatment Wetland
Monitored Natural Attenuation
Vertical Engineered Barrier
Institutional Controls
Alternative Water Supply
NA/NFA Only
Other
Mitigation
Institutional Controls
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
C-4
-------
Appendix C
Remedy Selection Summary Matrix, FY 2012-14
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Source
Groundwater
Vapor
Intrusion
c
aj
£
(0
CD
H
3
C
aj
£
03
0)
H
3
<7)
03
CO
O
a.
•
c
O
<
LL
aj
c
aj
E
03
0)
H
3
03
O)
H
T3
C
03
a.
F
nstructed Treatment Wetland
jnitored Natural Attenuation
rtical Engineered Barrier
titutional Controls
ernative Water Supply
_>•
c
o
<
LL
aj
c
o
03
bO
titutional Controls
Site Name OU Document Type Action ID || FY
C
X
LU
O
o
c
5
c aj
LU CC
<
2
O
C
3
CL
o
o
cu
>
c
<
<
2
O
c |
DEFENSE GENERAL SUPPLY CENTER (DLA) 07 ROD 010 2012
X
X
X
X
DEFENSE GENERAL SUPPLY CENTER (DLA) 13 ROD 016 2012
X
X
DIXIE CAVERNS COUNTY LANDFILL 02 ESD 001 2013
X
FIRST PIEDMONT CORP. ROCK QUARRY (ROUTE 719) 01 ROD Amendment 001 2014
X
X
X
X
GREENWOOD CHEMICAL CO. 04 ESD 003 2013
X
LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE/NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER 06 ROD 039 2014
X
LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE/NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER 28 ROD 037 2012
X
X
X
X
MARINE CORPS COMBAT DEVELOPMENT COMMAND 21 ROD 023 2014
X
X
X
NAVAL AMPHIBIOUS BASE LITTLE CREEK 12 ROD 012 2013
X
X
NAVAL WEAPONS STATION-YORKTOWN 15 ROD 030 2012
X
X
X
ST. JULIENS CREEK ANNEX (U.S. NAVY) 12 ROD 009 2012
X
X
Washington DC
WASHINGTON NAVY YARD 21 ROD 027 20131 I I I I I I I X | | | | | | | | | | |
West Virginia
ALLEGANY BALLISTICS LABORATORY (USNAVY)
04
ROD
004
2014
rn
X
X
X
X
rn
rn
rn
rn
rn
rn
rn
rn
rn
rn
rn
rn
ALLEGANY BALLISTICS LABORATORY (USNAVY)
11
ROD
015
2012
~
n
~
n
~
X
~
tn
X
tn
X
tn
tn
~
~
tn
Region 4
Alabama
INTERSTATE LEAD CO. (ILCO)
02
ROD Amendment
001
2012
X
X
X
X
OLIN CORP. (MCINTOSH PLANT)
02
ROD
002
2014
X
X
X
X
X
STAUFFER CHEMICAL CO. (COLD CREEK PLANT)
02
ESD
002
2012
X
US NASA MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER
03
ROD
018
2012
X
X
US NASA MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER
07
ROD
014
2013
X
X
Florida
FLORIDA STEEL CORP.
02
ESD
001
2013
X
X
JJ SEIFERT MACHINE
01
ROD
001
2013
X
X
X
X
X
X
ORLANDO GASIFICATION PLANT
01
ROD
001
2013
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
REEVES SOUTHEASTERN GALVANIZING CORP.
02
ROD Amendment
001
2014
X
X
X
SANFORD DRY CLEANERS
01
ROD
001
2013
X
X
X
X
X
X
WHITING FIELD NAVAL AIR STATION
27
ROD
028
2012
X
X
July 2017
C-
-------
Appendix C
Remedy Selection Summary Matrix, FY 2012-14
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Vapor
5ource
Groundwater
Intrusion
ahanced Monitored Natural
covery
nstructed Treatment Wetland
c
c
CD
£
(O
0)
H
3
\7)
c
cd
£
03
0)
1—
3
<7)
03
¦
c
O
<
LL
;z:
cd
_c
c
cd
E
03
a;
H
3
17^
03
0)
H
T3
C
03
a.
£
03
3
C
CD
<
"ro
3
03
;z:
T3
0J
o
'E
rtical Engineered Barrier
titutional Controls
ernative Water Supply
_>¦
c
O
<
LL
Z
aj
c
o
03
b0
titutional Controls
| Site Name OU Document Type Action ID FY
c
X
LU
O
o
c
5
c a;
LU CC
<
;z:
O
c
3
CL
o
u
i
aj
>
c
<
<
2
O
I
c |
Georgia
BRUNSWICK WOOD PRESERVING 02 ROD 002 2012
X
PEACH ORCHARD RDPCE GROUNDWATER PLUME SITE 01 ROD Amendment 001 2013
X
X
X
Kentucky
PADUCAH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT (USDOE) 19 ROD 029 2012
X
X
X
X
X
TRI-CITY DISPOSAL CO. 01 ESD 001 2012
X
Mississippi
CHEMFAX, INC. 01 ROD Amendment 001 20131 I I I I I I I I I I I I X | | | | | |
North Carolina
ABERDEEN CONTAMINATED GROUND WATER
01
ROD
001
2012
X
X
ABERDEEN CONTAMINATED GROUND WATER
01
ROD Amendment
002
2014
X
CAMP LEJEUNE MILITARY RES. (USNAVY)
12
ROD
030
2013
X
X
CAMP LEJEUNE MILITARY RES. (USNAVY)
15
ROD
031
2013
X
X
X
X
CAMP LEJEUNE MILITARY RES. (USNAVY)
17
ROD
028
2013
X
X
X
X
CAMP LEJEUNE MILITARY RES. (USNAVY)
24
ROD
032
2014
X
X
X
CHERRY POINT MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
01
ROD
017
2013
X
X
GMH ELECTRONICS
01
ROD
002
2014
X
X
X
X
KOPPERS CO., INC. (MORRISVILLE PLANT)
01
ESD
001
2012
X
X
X
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY (LOT 86, FARM UNIT#1)
01
ESD
001
2014
X
X
South Carolina
BREWER GOLD MINE 01 ROD 002 2014
X
X
X
ELMORE WASTE DISPOSAL 01 ESD 001 2014
X
MEDLEY FARM DRUM DUMP 01 ROD Amendment 001 2012
X
X
SAVANNAH RIVER SITE (USDOE) 21 ESD 027 2013
X
SAVANNAH RIVER SITE (USDOE) 29 ESD 025 2013
X
SAVANNAH RIVER SITE (USDOE) 35 ESD 024 2012
X
SAVANNAH RIVER SITE (USDOE) 48 ROD 176 2013
X
X
Tennessee
COPPER BASIN MINING DISTRICT 03 ROD 003 2012
X
X
X
X
GALLAWAY PITS 01 ROD Amendment 001 2014
X
MILAN ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT 05 ROD 044 2012
X
MILAN ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT 05 ROD 045 2014
X
July 2017
C-
-------
Appendix C
Remedy Selection Summary Matrix, FY 2012-14
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
MILAN ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT
06
ROD
039
2014
NATIONAL FIREWORKS
VELSICOL CHEMICAL CORP. (HARDEMAN COUNTY)
02
ROD
02 ROD Amendment
002
001
2014
2012
Region 5
Site Name
OU Document Type Action ID
Source
Groundwater
Vapor
Intrusion
-= Q_
Illinois
ALCOA PROPERTIES 01 ROD 001 2012
X
X
EAGLE ZINC CO DIVTL DIAMOND 02 ROD 002 2012
X
X
X
X
X
HEGELERZINC 03 ROD 002 2014
X
X
OLD AMERICAN ZINC PLANT 02 ROD 001 2012
X
X
X
X
OTTAWA RADIATION AREAS 06 ESD 002 2012
X
OTTAWA RADIATION AREAS 06 ROD Amendment 002 2013
X
X
OUTBOARD MARINE CORP. 04 ESD 004 2012
X
X
OUTBOARD MARINE CORP. 04 ROD Amendment 003 2013
X
X
X
X
SANGAMO ELECTRIC DUMP/CRAB ORCHARD NATIONAL
WILDLIFE REFUGE (USDOI) 02 ROD Amendment 002 2014
X
X
X
X
SAVANNA ARMY DEPOT ACTIVITY 08 ROD 008 2012
X
X
SAVANNA ARMY DEPOT ACTIVITY 09 ROD 009 2012
X
X
SAVANNA ARMY DEPOT ACTIVITY 10 ROD 013 2013
X
X
SAVANNA ARMY DEPOT ACTIVITY 17 ROD 018 2014
X
X
SAVANNA ARMY DEPOT ACTIVITY 23 ROD 012 2014
X
SAVANNA ARMY DEPOT ACTIVITY 26 ROD 019 2014
X
SOUTHEAST ROCKFORD GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION 03 ESD 003 2012
X
Indiana
DOUGLASS ROAD/UNI ROYAL, INC., LANDFILL
02
ESD
001
2012
X
LUSHER STREET GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
001
2014
X
X
X
X
U.S. SMELTER AND LEAD REFINERY, INC.
01
ROD
001
2013
X
X
X
Michigan
PEERLESS PLATING CO.
01
ROD Amendment
001
2013
X
X
ROSE TOWNSHIP DUMP
01
ESD
001
2013
X
X
TEN-MILE DRAIN
01
ROD
002
2014
X
X
X
X
VELSICOL CHEMICAL CORP. (MICHIGAN)
01
ROD
002
2012
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
VERONA WELL FIELD
02
ESD
004
2014
X
X
X
July 2017
C-
-------
Appendix C
Remedy Selection Summary Matrix, FY 2012-14
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Groundwater
Vapor
Intrusion
OU Document Type Action ID FY £
Minnesota
FMC CORP. (FRIDLEY PLANT) 01 ESD 001 2013
X
NEW BRIGHTON/ARDEN HILLS/TCAAP (USARMY) 07 ROD Amendment 009 2012
X
X
X
X
NEW BRIGHTON/ARDEN HILLS/TCAAP (USARMY) 07 ROD Amendment 999 2014
X
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA (ROSEMOUNT RESEARCH CENTER) 03 ESD 001 2014
X
Ohio
NEW LYME LANDFILL 01 ESD 001 2013
X
X
NORTH SANITARY LANDFILL 01 ROD 001 2013
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE 01 ESD 001 2012
X
Wisconsin
ONALASKA MUNICIPAL LANDFILL
01
ROD Amendment
001
2012
X
X
X
REFUSE HIDEAWAY LANDFILL
01
ESD
002
2012
X
TOMAH ARMORY
01
ESD
001
2014
X
X
WPSC CAMP MARINA MGP
02
ROD
002
2012
X
WPSC STEVENS POINT
01
ROD
001
2012
X
X
X
X
X
X
Region 6
New Mexico
EAGLE PICHER CAREFREE BATTERY
01
ROD
001
2014
~
~
X
~
~
rn
X
X
~
~
~
UNITED NUCLEAR CORP.
02
ROD
002
2013
~
~~
X
X
~~
~
tn
~
~
L3
Oklahoma
OKLAHOMA REFINING CO.
02
ROD
002
2013
1
nn
X
X
X
rn
nn
| |
rn
rn
1 1
TINKER AIR FORCE BASE (SOLDIER CREEK/BUILDING 3001)
01
ROD
009
2014
LlJ
LJ
X
tn
L_J
X
~
~
Texas
BANDERA ROAD GROUND WATER PLUME
01
ROD
001
2013
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
FRENCH, LTD.
01
ROD Amendment
001
2014
X
SOUTH CAVALCADE STREET
01
ROD Amendment
002
2014
X
X
X
X
STAR LAKE CANAL
01
ROD
001
2013
X
X
X
X
X
VAN DER HORST USA CORPORATION
01
ROD
001
2014
X
X
X
X
X
Region 7
Iowa
PEOPLES NATURAL GAS CO.
01
ROD Amendment
001
2013 |
~
x
1 1
~
~
X I
X I
x
1 1 1
~
~
X |
July 2017
C-
-------
Appendix C
Remedy Selection Summary Matrix, FY 2012-14
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Vapor
5ource
Groundwater
Intrusion
ahanced Monitored Natural
covery
nstructed Treatment Wetland
c
c
CD
£
03
0)
H
3
17^
c
cd
£
03
0)
1—
3
<7)
03
¦
c
O
<
LL
;z:
cd
c
¦
c
O
<
LL
Z
aj
_c
c
o
03
b0
titutional Controls
| Site Name OU Document Type Action ID FY
c
X
LU
O
o
c
5
c a;
LU CC
<
;z:
O
c
3
CL
o
u
i
aj
>
c
<
<
2
O
I
c |
Kansas
ACE SERVICES 01 isD 001 20121 | | | X | | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | |
Missouri
MADISON COUNTY MINES 03 ROD 006 2014
X
X
X
X
MADISON COUNTY MINES 05 ROD 005 2012
X
X
X
X
X
ORONOGO-DUENWEG MINING BELT 01 ROD Amendment 001 2013
X
SOUTHWEST JEFFERSON COUNTY MINING 01 ROD 001 2012
X
X
X
SOUTHWEST JEFFERSON COUNTY MINING 02 ROD 002 2012
X
X
X
SOUTHWEST JEFFERSON COUNTY MINING 03 ROD 003 2012
X
X
X
Nebraska
10TH STREET SITE
02
ROD Amendment
001
2013
X
X
X
X
CLEBURN STREET WELL
02
ROD Amendment
004
2012
X
X
X
X
GARVEY ELEVATOR
01
ROD
001
2013
X
X
GARVEY ELEVATOR
02
ROD
003
2013
X
X
NEBRASKA ORDNANCE PLANT (FORMER)
03
ROD
003
2013
X
X
NEBRASKA ORDNANCE PLANT (FORMER)
05
ROD
004
2013
X
X
X
X
Region 8
Colorado
AIR FORCE PLANT PJKS
01
ROD
001
2013
X
X
X
CALIFORNIA GULCH
01
ESD
005
2013
X
CALIFORNIA GULCH
03
ESD
009
2014
X
CALIFORNIA GULCH
04
ESD
007
2013
X
CALIFORNIA GULCH
10
ESD
008
2013
X
CAPTAIN JACK MILL
01
ESD
001
2012
X
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ARSENAL (USARMY)
03
ESD
023
2012
X
X
Montana
ANACONDA CO. SMELTER 16 ROD Amendment 002 2013
X
X
X
FLAT CREEK IMM 01 ROD 001 2012
X
X
South Dakota
ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE 11 ROD Amendment 001 2012
X
GILT EDGE MINE 01 ESD 001 2014
X
X
July 2017
C-
-------
Appendix C
Remedy Selection Summary Matrix, FY 2012-14
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Vapor
5ource
Groundwater
Intrusion
ahanced Monitored Natural
covery
nstructed Treatment Wetland
c
c
CD
£
(O
0)
H
3
17^
c
cd
£
03
0)
1—
3
<7)
03
¦
c
O
<
LL
;z:
cd
_c
c
cd
E
03
a;
H
3
17^
03
0)
H
T3
C
03
a.
£
03
3
C
CD
<
~03
3
03
;z:
T3
OJ
o
'E
rtical Engineered Barrier
titutional Controls
ernative Water Supply
_>¦
c
O
<
LL
Z
aj
c
o
03
bO
titutional Controls
| Site Name OU Document Type Action ID FY
c
X
LU
O
o
c
5
c a;
LU CC
<
;z:
O
c
3
CL
o
u
i
aj
>
c
<
<
2
O
I
c |
Utah
HILL AIR FORCE BASE 06 ESD 007 2014
X
HILL AIR FORCE BASE 13 ROD 018 2014
X
X
OGDEN DEFENSE DEPOT (DLA) 04 ESD 005 2013
X
TOOELE ARMY DEPOT (NORTH AREA) 16 ROD 012 2014
X
Wyoming
F.E. WARREN AIR FORCE BASE
14
ROD
026
20131 | | |
1 1 1 1 X |
1 X | | |
1 1
| Region 9 |
Arizona
INDIAN BEND WASH AREA 08 ESD 001 2012
X
PHOENIX-GOODYEAR AIRPORT AREA 01 ROD Amendment 002 2014
X
X
TUCSON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AREA 01 ROD Amendment 003 2012
X
X
X
WILLIAMS AIR FORCE BASE 01 ROD Amendment 002 2014
X
X
X
X
WILLIAMS AIR FORCE BASE 02 ROD Amendment 003 2013
X
X
X
X
California
ALAMEDA NAVAL AIR STATION 01 ESD 001 2012
X
ALAMEDA NAVAL AIR STATION 02 ROD 002 2013
X
X
X
X
ALAMEDA NAVAL AIR STATION 03 ROD Amendment 001 2014
X
X
ALAMEDA NAVAL AIR STATION 08 ROD 008 2014
X
X
X
X
X
X
CAMP PENDLETON MARINE CORPS BASE 05 ROD 011 2013
X
X
CAMP PENDLETON MARINE CORPS BASE 05 ROD 999 2014
X
X
X
CONCORD NAVAL WEAPONS STATION 02 ROD 002 2013
X
X
CONCORD NAVAL WEAPONS STATION 03 ESD 002 2013
X
CONCORD NAVAL WEAPONS STATION 04 ROD 003 2013
X
X
CONCORD NAVAL WEAPONS STATION 08 ROD 008 2013
X
EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE 02 ROD Amendment 001 2012
X
X
X
EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE 11 ESD 001 2013
X
EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE 13 ROD 015 2012
X
X
X
X
X
X
EL TORO MARINE CORPS AIR STATION 08 ROD 008 2012
X
X
X
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER
CONTAMINATION) 01 ESD 002 2013
X
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUNDWATER
CONTAMINATION) 05 ROD 007 2012
X
X
X
X
July 2017
C-10
-------
c_
<
NJ
O
"D "D "D ^
m m m r?
> > > >
73 l]
§
>
§
>
33 33 33 H
o
w O ^ O w o
OOOH"OH"OH"0
33333in^n^n^
>
O
>
o
>
o
OOO^H^—133—|
m "7 m "? m
"O "O "O
> o > o > o
Q o Q O Q O
>
H
O
33 33 33 33
o o o o
D D O D
o o o o
SJ W N) M
O O O O
W NJ W
n
>
H
O
O
o
>
H
o
o
o
> > > > >
33 33 33 33 33
-n ~n ti ~n -n
O O O O O
33 33 33 33 33
o n o o o
m m m m m
ro ro ro ro ro
> > > > >
i/i i/i i/i i/i i/i
o o o o o
33 33 33 33 33
O O O O O
o o a o o
0 o o o o
W N) W M ro
01 Ln w io ¦ ¦
ro NJ M KJ
>
to
C
>
o
>
<
>
to
H
5
o
o
o
>
to
c
>
o
>
<
>
to
H
5
o
o
o
>
to
c
>
o
>
<
>
to
H
5
o
o
o
H to 73 "O
33 I -p C
5 > m 2
> > 1 9
33 ^ ^ r-
ti ^
O <
o o
o
o O
o
o O
o
o S
2 o
2 n
2 n
—1 r-^
—1 r-2
—1 r-2
> m
> m
J> rn
^ S=
^ E
^ S=
> J
> I
> J
—1 >
—i >
—1 >
O ^
o ^
O
2 "TI
2 -n
2 -n
—' o
— O
—' O
33
33
33
O
O
D
TO
TO
03
>
>
>
to
m
to
m
to
m
Q
Q
"o
33
33
33
o
o
O
c
cz
C
z
z
Z
o
o
o
:>
:>
:>
>
>
>
—1
—1
—1
33
33
33
o o o o o
o
o
o
o
o o o o o o
O O O O O I—1
ai H M M NJ M
W M M M NJ M
O O O O O O
-pi 4S» to N) -P» NJ
n Situ Treatment
Ex Situ Treatment
Off site Disposal
On site Containment
Institutiona Contro s
Monitored Natural Recovery
Enahanced Monitored Natural
Recovery
NA/NFAOnly
n Situ Treatment
Pump and Treat
Constructed Treatment Wetland
Monitored Natura Attenuation
ertical Engineered Barrier
nstitutional Controls
Alternative Water Supply
NA/NFAOnly
Mitigation
Institutional Controls
£ >
3
= T3
S. «
¦< 3
2. x
S n
pt
5"
3
t/>
c
3
3
su
su
ft
x
-n
-<
N»
O
l-»
N»
l-»
JS>
t/>
c
~o
n>
c
3
Q.
30
n>
3
n>
Q.
«<
73
n>
~o
o
tn
O
3
-------
c_
<
NJ
O
o > >
> > > > >
o o o o o
qkzzSSSq
o o o >
to m
>
=1
23 23 23
CI CI W W W
o o o o
O
O
>
m 3
V* o O fD _
O D D =5 D
n
i—^
NJ
73 3J
o o o o o
— O U O O
ooooooooo
ooooowwoo
PPUlP-fiiJ30l-'y3
MNJWNJWNJMMN)
OOOOOOOOO
< O
-Z. PO
m Q
> s
>
CD
O
O D
n; nj
o o
M M
OJ UJ
O
C
>
cz
o
o o
3 ^ 33
o o o
O O
> >
a
>
fD (D (D
N) NJ K)
o o o
M l-> M
W W M
Vertical Engineered Barrier
Institutional Controls
Alternative Water Supply
Off site Disposal
On site Containment
Other
Constructed Treatment Wetland
Other
In Situ Treatment
Ex Situ Treatment
Institutional Controls
Monitored Natural Recovery
Enahanced Monitored Natural
Recovery
NA/NFA Only
In Situ Treatment
Pump and Treat
Monitored Natural Attenuation
NA/NFA Only
Mitigation
Institutional Controls
% >
= T3
2. 5
¦< 3
2. x
8 n
pt
5"
3
t/>
c
3
3
SD
SD
ft
x
-n
-<
N»
O
l-»
N»
l-»
JS.
t/>
c
~o
n>
c
3
Q.
73
n>
3
n>
Q.
«<
73
n>
~o
o
Ui
O
3
-------
Appendix D
Individual Contaminants and Assigned Contaminant
Groups
-------
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
•rr ¦ ¦ —
Individual Contaminants and Assigned Contaminant Groups
Hig
10
ro
-t—'
i Level Group
X u £
lzene-toluene ethylbenzene xylene (BTEX)
10
c
fU
L_
=5
M—
~o
c
ro
10
c
X
10
U
O
>
~o
<1)
-M
fU
c
00
~o
£= c
~o ~o
(1) (U
¦4—' +-»
fU fU
c c
I/)
o
>
-t—'
o
O
-t—'
o
-t—'
O
O
-t—'
o
(IJ
Q_
o
Q_
o
Q_
_C
u
_c
u
ca
DC
1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
X
X
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
X
X
1,1,2,2-TETRABROMOETHANE
X
X
l,l,2-TRICHLORO-l,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE
X
X
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
X
X
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
X
X
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
X
X
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HEPTACHLORODIBENZO-p-DIOXIN
X
X
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HEPTACHLORODIBENZO-p-DIOXIN (HpCDD)
X
X
1,2,3,4,7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN (HxCDF)
X
X
1,2,3,4,7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZO-p-DIOXIN
X
X
1,2,3,4-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
X
X
1,2,3,6,7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN (HxCDF)
X
X
1,2,3,6,7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZO-p-DIOXIN
X
X
1,2,3,7,8-PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
X
X
1,2,3,7,8-PENTACHLORODIBENZO-p-DIOXIN
X
X
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
X
X
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
X
X
1,2,3-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
X
X
1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
X
X
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
X
X
1,2,4-TRIMETHYL BENZENE
X
X
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
X
X
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
X
X
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
X
X
July 2017
D-l
-------
c_
<
hJ
o
N)
4^
cn
—I
E?
O
X
I—
O
73
O
o
X
-<
>
o
o
>
n
a
a
I
hJ
IV)
NJ
CO
CO
vl
vl
00
00
—1
—1
—1
—1
>
>
a
O
_L
_L
i—
i—
o
O
73
73
o
o
o
o
CD
CD
2
2
N
rsi
O
O
~o
~o
O
a
o
o
X
X
2
—1
o
u
a
3 >
9: "D
< ~o
a. n>
i i.
9 *
5 O
Q)
3
3*
Q)
3
r+
(/)
CD
3
Q.
>
(/)
(/>
era'
3
n>
Q.
n
o
3
r+
CD
3
3*
Q)
3
r+
O
o
c
T3
(/)
Metals
SVOC
VOC
Other
Benzene-toluene ethylbenzene xylene (BTEX)
Dioxins and furans
Halogenated VOCs
Metals and metalloids
Other halogenated SVOCs
Other Inorganics
Other nonhalogenated SVOCs
Other nonhalogenated VOCs
Other Organics
Pesticides and herbicides
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Chemical and biological warfare agents (metal)
Chemical and biological warfare agents (non-metal)
Munitions Constituents (metal/inorganic)
Munitions Constituents (SVOC)
Munitions Constituents (VOC)
Radioactive materials (metal)
Radioactive materials (non-metal)
i/>
c
£
(D
3,
Q.
73
n>
3
n>
a.
<
73
m
s
cn
r+
3"
m
Q.
r-t
O
-------
c_
<
hJ
o
a
i
U)
>
T3
T3
ro
3
Q.
55"
D
Benzene-toluene ethylbenzene xylene (BTEX)
Dioxins and furans
Halogenated VOCs
Meta sand meta oids
Other halogenated SVOCs
Other Inorganics
Other nonhalogenated SVOCs
Other nonhalogenated VOCs
Other Organics
Pesticides and herbicides
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Chemical and biological warfare agents (metal)
Chemical and biological warfare agents (non-metal)
Munitions Constituents (metal/inorganic)
Munitions Constituents (SVOC)
Munitions Constituents (VOC)
Radioactive materials (metal)
Radioactive materials (non-metal)
-------
c_
<
hJ
o
a
i
-------
>
T3
T3
ro
3
Q.
55"
D
Benzene-toluene ethylbenzene xylene (BTEX)
Dioxins and furans
Halogenated VOCs
Metals and metalloids
Other halogenated SVOCs
Other Inorganics
Other nonhalogenated SVOCs
Other nonhalogenated VOCs
Other Organics
Pesticides and herbicides
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Chemical and biological warfare agents (metal)
Chemical and biological warfare agents (non-metal)
Munitions Constituents (metal/inorganic)
Munitions Constituents (SVOC)
Munitions Constituents (VOC)
Radioactive materials (metal)
Radioactive materials (non-metal)
i/>
c
£
(D
3,
73
m
3
m
Q.
<
73
m
s
cn
r+
3"
m
Q.
r-t
O
-------
3 >
9: "D
< ~o
a. n>
i s.
9 *
5 o
CD
3
Benzene-toluene ethylbenzene xylene (BTEX)
Dioxins and furans
Halogenated VOCs
Metals and metalloids
Other halogenated SVOCs
Other Inorganics
Other nonhalogenated SVOCs
Other nonhalogenated VOCs
Other Organics
Pesticides and herbicides
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Chemical and biological warfare agents (metal)
Chemical and biological warfare agents (non-metal)
Munitions Constituents (metal/inorganic)
Munitions Constituents (SVOC)
Munitions Constituents (VOC)
Radioactive materials (metal)
Radioactive materials (non-metal)
i/>
c
£
(D
3,
73
m
3
m
Q.
<
73
m
s
cn
r+
3"
m
Q.
r-t
O
-------
c_
<
hJ
o
a
i
CDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCD
>
T3
T3
ro
3
Q.
55"
D
Benzene-toluene ethylbenzene xylene (BTEX)
Dioxins and furans
Halogenated VOCs
Meta sand meta oids
Other halogenated SVOCs
Other Inorganics
Other nonhalogenated SVOCs
Other nonhalogenated VOCs
Other Organics
Pesticides and herbicides
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Chemical and biological warfare agents (metal)
Chemical and biological warfare agents (non-metal)
Munitions Constituents (metal/inorganic)
Munitions Constituents (SVOC)
Munitions Constituents (VOC)
Radioactive materials (metal)
Radioactive materials (non-metal)
-------
3 >
9: "D
< ~o
a. n>
i s.
9 *
5 o
CD
3
Benzene-toluene ethylbenzene xylene (BTEX)
Dioxins and furans
Halogenated VOCs
Metals and metalloids
Other halogenated SVOCs
Other Inorganics
Other nonhalogenated SVOCs
Other nonhalogenated VOCs
Other Organics
Pesticides and herbicides
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Chemical and biological warfare agents (metal)
Chemical and biological warfare agents (non-metal)
Munitions Constituents (metal/inorganic)
Munitions Constituents (SVOC)
Munitions Constituents (VOC)
Radioactive materials (metal)
Radioactive materials (non-metal)
i/>
c
£
(D
3,
73
m
3
m
Q.
<
73
m
s
cn
r+
3"
m
Q.
r-t
O
-------
3 >
9: "D
< ~o
a. n>
i s.
9 *
5 o
CD
3
Benzene-toluene ethylbenzene xylene (BTEX)
Dioxins and furans
Halogenated VOCs
Metals and metalloids
Other halogenated SVOCs
Other Inorganics
Other nonhalogenated SVOCs
Other nonhalogenated VOCs
Other Organics
Pesticides and herbicides
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Chemical and biological warfare agents (metal)
Chemical and biological warfare agents (non-metal)
Munitions Constituents (metal/inorganic)
Munitions Constituents (SVOC)
Munitions Constituents (VOC)
Radioactive materials (metal)
Radioactive materials (non-metal)
i/>
c
£
(D
3,
73
m
3
m
Q.
<
73
m
s
cn
r+
3"
m
Q.
r-t
O
-------
-------
Appendix D
•rr ¦ ¦ —
Individual Contaminants and Assigned Contaminant Groups
Hig
10
ro
-t—'
i Level Group
X u £
lzene-toluene ethylbenzene xylene (BTEX)
10
c
fU
L_
=5
M—
~o
c
ro
10
c
"x
10
U
O
>
T3
(D
-M
fU
c
00
T3
(U
+j 10
fU .u
£= c
T3 ~0
(1) (U
¦4—' +-»
fU fU
c c
I/)
o
>
-t—'
o
O
4->
O
-t—'
O
-t—'
o
-M
o
01
Q_
o
Q_
o
Q_
_C
u
_c
u
DC
CC
DIBENZ(A,J)ANTHRACENE
X
X
DIBENZO(A,E)PYRENE
X
X
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
X
X
DIBENZO(A,H)PYRENE
X
X
DIBENZOFURAN
X
X
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
X
X
DIBROMOCHLOROPROPANE
X
X
DIBROMODIFLUOROMETHANE
X
X
DIBROMOMETHANE
X
X
DIBUTYLPHTHALATE
X
X
DICAMBA
X
X
DICHLOBENIL
X
X
DICHLOROBENZENE (MIXED ISOMERS)
X
X
DICHLOROBROMOMETHANE
X
X
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
X
X
DICHLOROPROPANE
X
X
DICHLORPROP
X
X
DICOFOL
X
X
DICYCLOPENTADIENE
X
X
DIELDRIN
X
X
DIESEL FUEL
X
X
DIESEL RANGE ORGANICS (DRO)
X
X
DIETHYL BENZENE
X
X
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
X
X
DIETHYLENE GLYCOL
X
X
July 2017
D-ll
-------
c_
<
hJ
o
a
i
i—^
a o o a
-------
c_
<
hJ
o
a
i
i—^
OJ
-------
c_
<
hJ
o
a
i
i—^
-------
c_
<
hJ
o
a
i
i—^
Ln
>
T3
T3
ro
3
Q.
55"
D
Benzene-toluene ethylbenzene xylene (BTEX)
Dioxins and furans
Halogenated VOCs
Meta sand meta oids
Other halogenated SVOCs
Other Inorganics
Other nonhalogenated SVOCs
Other nonhalogenated VOCs
Other Organics
Pesticides and herbicides
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Chemical and biological warfare agents (metal)
Chemical and biological warfare agents (non-metal)
Munitions Constituents (metal/inorganic)
Munitions Constituents (SVOC)
Munitions Constituents (VOC)
Radioactive materials (metal)
Radioactive materials (non-metal)
-------
c_
<
hJ
o
a
i
i—^
CD
-------
-<
I—
~Q
X
O
00
~Q
O
—l
>
X)
o
c
o
a
o
-<
>
o
-<
o
CD
c= 11
>
T3
T3
ro
3
a.
55"
D
00
O
Benzene-toluene ethylbenzene xylene (BTEX)
Dioxins and furans
Halogenated VOCs
Metals and metalloids
Other halogenated SVOCs
Other Inorganics
Other nonhalogenated SVOCs
Other nonhalogenated VOCs
Other Organics
Pesticides and herbicides
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Chemical and biological warfare agents (metal)
Chemical and biological warfare agents (non-metal)
Munitions Constituents (metal/inorganic)
Munitions Constituents (SVOC)
Munitions Constituents (VOC)
Radioactive materials (metal)
Radioactive materials (non-metal)
i/>
c
£
(D
3,
73
m
3
m
Q.
<
73
m
s
cn
r+
3"
m
Q.
r-t
O
-------
c_
<
hJ
o
a
i
i—^
00
-------
>
T3
T3
ro
3
Q.
55"
D
Benzene-toluene ethylbenzene xylene (BTEX)
Dioxins and furans
Halogenated VOCs
Metals and metalloids
Other halogenated SVOCs
Other Inorganics
Other nonhalogenated SVOCs
Other nonhalogenated VOCs
Other Organics
Pesticides and herbicides
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Chemical and biological warfare agents (metal)
Chemical and biological warfare agents (non-metal)
Munitions Constituents (metal/inorganic)
Munitions Constituents (SVOC)
Munitions Constituents (VOC)
Radioactive materials (metal)
Radioactive materials (non-metal)
i/>
c
£
(D
3,
73
m
3
m
Q.
<
73
m
s
cn
r+
3"
m
Q.
r-t
O
-------
3 >
9: "D
< ~o
a. n>
i s.
9 *
5 o
CD
3
Benzene-toluene ethylbenzene xylene (BTEX)
Dioxins and furans
Halogenated VOCs
Metals and metalloids
Other halogenated SVOCs
Other Inorganics
Other nonhalogenated SVOCs
Other nonhalogenated VOCs
Other Organics
Pesticides and herbicides
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Chemical and biological warfare agents (metal)
Chemical and biological warfare agents (non-metal)
Munitions Constituents (metal/inorganic)
Munitions Constituents (SVOC)
Munitions Constituents (VOC)
Radioactive materials (metal)
Radioactive materials (non-metal)
i/>
c
£
(D
3,
73
m
3
m
a.
<
73
m
s
tn
r+
3"
m
Q.
r-t
O
-------
3 >
9: "D
< ~o
a. n>
i s.
9 *
5 o
CD
3
Benzene-toluene ethylbenzene xylene (BTEX)
Dioxins and furans
Halogenated VOCs
Metals and metalloids
Other halogenated SVOCs
Other Inorganics
Other nonhalogenated SVOCs
Other nonhalogenated VOCs
Other Organics
Pesticides and herbicides
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Chemical and biological warfare agents (metal)
Chemical and biological warfare agents (non-metal)
Munitions Constituents (metal/inorganic)
Munitions Constituents (SVOC)
Munitions Constituents (VOC)
Radioactive materials (metal)
Radioactive materials (non-metal)
i/>
c
£
(D
3,
73
m
3
m
Q.
<
73
m
s
cn
r+
3"
m
Q.
r-t
O
-------
c_
<
hJ
o
M
hJ
-------
Radioactive materials (metal)
>
T3
T3
ro
3
Q.
55"
D
Benzene-toluene ethylbenzene xylene (BTEX)
Dioxins and furans
Halogenated VOCs
Metals and metalloids
Other halogenated SVOCs
Other Inorganics
Other nonhalogenated SVOCs
Other nonhalogenated VOCs
Other Organics
Pesticides and herbicides
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Chemical and biological warfare agents (metal)
Chemical and biological warfare agents (non-metal)
Munitions Constituents (metal/inorganic)
Munitions Constituents (SVOC)
i/>
c
£
(D
3,
73
m
3
m
Q.
<
73
m
s
Munitions Constituents (VOC)
Kn
Radioactive materials (non-metal)
-------
c_
<
hJ
o
M
-------
>
T3
T3
ro
3
Q.
55"
D
Benzene-toluene ethylbenzene xylene (BTEX)
Dioxins and furans
Halogenated VOCs
Meta sand meta oids
Other halogenated SVOCs
Other Inorganics
Other nonhalogenated SVOCs
Other nonhalogenated VOCs
Other Organics
Pesticides and herbicides
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Chemical and biological warfare agents (metal)
Chemical and biological warfare agents (non-metal)
Munitions Constituents (metal/inorganic)
Munitions Constituents (SVOC)
Munitions Constituents (VOC)
Radioactive materials (metal)
Radioactive materials (non-metal)
-------
Appendix E
Source Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from
FY 2012-2014
-------
Appendix E
Source Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
FY
Site Name
ou
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
IN SITU TREATMENT
Bioremediation
2014
GMH ELECTRONICS
01
ROD
04
NC
NCN000410161
2013
HAMILTON/LABREE ROADS GW CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
10
WA
WASFN1002174
2014
MATTIACE PETROCHEMICAL CO., INC.
01
ROD Amendment
02
NY
NYD000512459
2014
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION)
06
ROD
09
CA
CA4570024337
2013
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. (SARATOGA SPRINGS PLANT)
02
ROD
02
NY
NYD980664361
2012
PADUCAH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT (USDOE)
19
ROD
04
KY
KY8890008982
2014
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
05
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
Cap (Amended, In Situ)
2013
CONCORD NAVAL WEAPONS STATION
02
ROD
09
CA
CA7170024528
2013
GO WAN US CANAL
01
ROD
02
NY
NYN000206222
2014
OLIN CORP. (MCINTOSH PLANT)
02
ROD
04
AL
ALD008188708
Chemical Treatment
2013
10TH STREET SITE
02
ROD Amendment
07
NE
NED981713837
2014
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND (EDGEWOOD AREA)
29
ROD
03
MD
MD2210020036
2013
ELLIS PROPERTY
01
ROD Amendment
02
NJ
NJD980529085
2014
GMH ELECTRONICS
01
ROD
04
NC
NCN000410161
2014
HANFORD 300-AREA (USDOE)
04
ROD
10
WA
WA2890090077
2012
KOPPERS CO., INC. (MORRISVILLE PLANT)
01
ESD
04
NC
NCD003200383
2014
OLEAN WELL FIELD
02
ROD Amendment
02
NY
NYD980528657
2013
PEERLESS PLATING CO.
01
ROD Amendment
05
Ml
MID006031348
2014
SANGAMO ELECTRIC DUMP/CRAB ORCHARD NATIONAL WILDLIFE
REFUGE (USDOI)
02
ROD Amendment
05
IL
IL8143609487
2014
TINKER AIR FORCE BASE (SOLDIER CREEK/BUILDING 3001)
01
ROD
06
OK
OK1571724391
2012
US NASA MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER
03
ROD
04
AL
AL1800013863
2012
VELSICOL CHEMICAL CORP. (MICHIGAN)
01
ROD
05
Ml
MID000722439
July 2017
E-l
-------
Appendix E
Source Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
FY
Site Name
ou
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
fracturing
2012 US NASA MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER
03
ROD
04
AL
AL1800013863
|/lulti phase Extraction
2013 JACKSON PARK HOUSING COMPLEX (USNAVY)
01
ROD Amendment
10
WA
WA3170090044
fhytoremediation
2014 NATIONAL FIREWORKS
02
ROD
04
TN
TNSFN0407047
[oil Amendments
2013
ANACONDA CO. SMELTER
16
ROD Amendment
08
MT
MTD093291656
2014
GILT EDGE MINE
01
ESD
08
SD
SDD987673985
foil Vapor Extraction
2012
AMERICAN CYANAMID CO
04
ROD
02
NJ
NJD002173276
2013
BANDERA ROAD GROUND WATER PLUME
01
ROD
06
TX
TXN000606565
2014
CIDRA GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
02
PR
PRN000204538
2014
GMH ELECTRONICS
01
ROD
04
NC
NCN000410161
2014
MAYWOOD CHEMICAL CO.
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJD980529762
2013
NORTH SANITARY LANDFILL
01
ROD
05
OH
OHD980611875
2013
OTIS AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE/CAMP EDWARDS
05
ESD
01
MA
MA2570024487
2013
PEACH ORCHARD RD PCE GROUNDWATER PLUME SITE
01
ROD Amendment
04
GA
GAN000407449
2013
SANFORD DRY CLEANERS
01
ROD
04
FL
FLD032728032
2014
TINKER AIR FORCE BASE (SOLDIER CREEK/BUILDING 3001)
01
ROD
06
OK
OK1571724391
2014
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
05
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2012
VELSICOL CHEMICAL CORP. (HARDEMAN COUNTY)
02
ROD Amendment
04
TN
TND980559033
2013
WHITE SWAN LAUNDRY AND CLEANER INC.
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJSFN0204241
2014
WILLIAMS AIR FORCE BASE
01
ROD Amendment
09
AZ
AZ7570028582
Jolidification/Stabilization
2012
AMERICAN CYANAMID CO
04
ROD
02
NJ
NJD002173276
2012
EAGLE ZINC CO DIV T L DIAMOND
02
ROD
05
IL
ILD980606941
2013
GO WAN US CANAL
01
ROD
02
NY
NYN000206222
2014
LCP CHEMICALS INC.
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJD079303020
July 2017
E-2
-------
Appendix E
Source Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
FY
Site Name
OU
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2013
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. (SARATOGA SPRINGS PLANT)
02
ROD
02
NY
NYD980664361
2013
ORLANDO GASIFICATION PLANT
01
ROD
04
FL
FLD984169235
2014
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
05
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
[hernial Treatment
2014
CIDRA GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
02
PR
PRN000204538
2012
CLEBURN STREET WELL
02
ROD Amendment
07
NE
NED981499312
2012
DIAZ CHEMICAL
02
ROD
02
NY
NYD067532580
2013
HAMILTON/LABREE ROADS GW CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
10
WA
WASFN1002174
2013
JACKSON PARK HOUSING COMPLEX (USNAVY)
01
ROD Amendment
10
WA
WA3170090044
2014
MATTIACE PETROCHEMICAL CO., INC.
01
ROD Amendment
02
NY
NYD000512459
2012
SOUTHEAST ROCKFORD GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION
03
ESD
05
IL
ILD981000417
2012
SPECTRON, INC.
01
ROD Amendment
03
MD
MDD000218008
2014
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
05
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2013
WILLIAMS AIR FORCE BASE
02
ROD Amendment
09
AZ
AZ7570028582
|X SITU TREATMENT
[ioremediation
2014 LORING AIR FORCE BASE
08
ESD
01
ME
ME9570024522
[hemical Treatment
2014
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND (EDGEWOOD AREA)
29
ROD
03
MD
MD2210020036
2013
HAMILTON/LABREE ROADS GW CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
10
WA
WASFN1002174
2013
OKLAHOMA REFINING CO.
02
ROD
06
OK
OKD091598870
constructed Treatment Wetland
2014 LOWER DARBY CREEK AREA
01
ROD
03
PA
PASFN0305521
physical Separation
2013
68TH STREET DUMP/INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES
01
ROD
03
MD
MDD980918387
2014
ALLEGANY BALLISTICS LABORATORY (USNAVY)
04
ROD
03
WV
WV0170023691
2013
ANACONDA CO. SMELTER
16
ROD Amendment
08
MT
MTD093291656
2012
BUNKER HILL MINING & METALLURGICAL COMPLEX
03
ROD Amendment
10
ID
IDD048340921
July 2017
E-3
-------
Appendix E
Source Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
FY
Site Name
OU
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2012
CENTREDALE MANOR RESTORATION PROJECT
01
ROD
01
Rl
RID981203755
2012
CLEBURN STREET WELL
02
ROD Amendment
07
NE
NED981499312
2012
CROWN CLEANERS OF WATERTOWN INC.
01
ROD
02
NY
NYD986965333
2012
EASTERN MICHAUD FLATS CONTAMINATION
01
ROD Amendment
10
ID
IDD984666610
2012
EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE
02
ROD Amendment
09
CA
CA1570024504
2014
INDUSTRI-PLEX
02
ESD
01
MA
MAD076580950
2014
LCP CHEMICALS INC.
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJD079303020
2014
MAYWOOD CHEMICAL CO.
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJD980529762
2012
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION)
05
ROD
09
CA
CA4570024337
2013
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION)
07
ROD
09
CA
CA4570024337
2012
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
07
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
05
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
06
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
ONONDAGA LAKE
25
ROD
02
NY
NYD986913580
2013
PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD
04
ROD
01
ME
ME7170022019
2014
RADIATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.
03
ROD
02
NJ
NJD047684451
2012
RIO TINTO COPPER MINE
01
ROD
09
NV
NV3141190030
2014
SHIELDALLOYCORP.
02
ROD
02
NJ
NJD002365930
2013
STAR LAKE CANAL
01
ROD
06
TX
TX0001414341
2014
TEN-MILE DRAIN
01
ROD
05
Ml
MIN000510063
2013
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
07
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2014
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
05
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2014
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
10
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
Recycling
2013
68TH STREET DUMP/INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES
01
ROD
03
MD
MDD980918387
2014
ALLEGANY BALLISTICS LABORATORY (USNAVY)
04
ROD
03
WV
WV0170023691
2012
EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE
02
ROD Amendment
09
CA
CA1570024504
July 2017
E-4
-------
Appendix E
Source Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
FY
Site Name
ou
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2012
EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE
13
ROD
09
CA
CA1570024504
2012
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE
20
ROD
03
MD
MD9210020567
2013
GO WAN US CANAL
01
ROD
02
NY
NYN000206222
2014
LCP CHEMICALS INC.
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJD079303020
2014
RINGWOOD MINES/LANDFILL
02
ROD
02
NJ
NJD980529739
2014
SOUTH CAVALCADE STREET
01
ROD Amendment
06
TX
TXD980810386
2014
TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE
06
ROD
09
CA
CA5570024575
2013
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
07
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2013
WILLIAMS AIR FORCE BASE
02
ROD Amendment
09
AZ
AZ7570028582
Soil Vapor Extraction
2013 GARVEY ELEVATOR
01
ROD
07
NE
NEN000704351
Solidification/Stabilization
2014
BANGOR NAVAL SUBMARINE BASE
09
ROD
10
WA
WA5170027291
2013
GO WAN US CANAL
01
ROD
02
NY
NYN000206222
2012
SOLVENT SAVERS
01
ESD
02
NY
NYD980421176
2014
TEN-MILE DRAIN
01
ROD
05
Ml
MIN000510063
2012
WPSC STEVENS POINT
01
ROD
05
Wl
WIN000509983
Source Pump and Treat
2012
BUNKER HILL MINING & METALLURGICAL COMPLEX
03
ROD Amendment
10
ID
IDD048340921
2013
NORTH SANITARY LANDFILL
01
ROD
05
OH
OHD980611875
2012
RIO TINTO COPPER MINE
01
ROD
09
NV
NV3141190030
Thermal Treatment
2012
ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE
01
ROD
09
GU
GU6571999519
2012
CENTREDALE MANOR RESTORATION PROJECT
01
ROD
01
Rl
RID981203755
2013
GO WAN US CANAL
01
ROD
02
NY
NYN000206222
2012
VELSICOL CHEMICAL CORP. (MICHIGAN)
01
ROD
05
Ml
MID000722439
Unspecified Off site Treatment
2014
ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE
01
ROD
09
GU
GU6571999519
2012
CROWN CLEANERS OF WATERTOWN INC.
01
ROD
02
NY
NYD986965333
July 2017
E-5
-------
Appendix E
Source Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
FY
Site Name
OU
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2014
DAVISVILLE NAVAL CONSTRUCTION BATTALION CENTER
09
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170022036
2014
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE
18
ROD
03
MD
MD9210020567
2014
HANFORD 100-AREA (USDOE)
35
ROD
10
WA
WA3890090076
2012
SPECTRON, INC.
02
ROD
03
MD
MDD000218008
2014
TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE
06
ROD
09
CA
CA5570024575
Unspecified On site Treatment
2012
ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE
01 (Action
ID 023)
ROD
09
GU
GU6571999519
2012
ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE
01 (Action
ID 025)
ROD
09
GU
GU6571999519
2012
ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE
01 (Action
ID 026)
ROD
09
GU
GU6571999519
2014
HANFORD 300-AREA (USDOE)
04
ROD
10
WA
WA2890090077
2012
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION)
05
ROD
09
CA
CA4570024337
2014
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION)
06
ROD
09
CA
CA4570024337
CONTAINMENT/DISPOSAL
Drainage/Erosion Control
2013
68TH STREET DUMP/INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES
01
ROD
03
MD
MDD980918387
2012
ACE SERVICES
01
ESD
07
KS
KSD046746731
2014
ALAMEDA NAVAL AIR STATION
08
ROD
09
CA
CA2170023236
2012
ALCOA PROPERTIES
01
ROD
05
IL
ILSFN0508010
2014
ALLEGANY BALLISTICS LABORATORY (USNAVY)
04
ROD
03
WV
WV0170023691
2013
ANACONDA CO. SMELTER
16
ROD Amendment
08
MT
MTD093291656
2012
BUNKER HILL MINING & METALLURGICAL COMPLEX
03
ROD Amendment
10
ID
IDD048340921
2013
CALLAHAN MINING CORP
01
ESD
01
ME
MED980524128
2013
CAMP LEJEUNE MILITARY RES. (USNAVY)
15
ROD
04
NC
NC6170022580
2012
EAGLE ZINC CO DIV T L DIAMOND
02
ROD
05
IL
ILD980606941
July 2017
E-6
-------
Appendix E
Source Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
FY
Site Name
OU
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2012
EASTERN MICHAUD FLATS CONTAMINATION
01
ROD Amendment
10
ID
IDD984666610
2012
EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE
02
ROD Amendment
09
CA
CA1570024504
2012
EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE
13
ROD
09
CA
CA1570024504
2012
FLAT CREEK IMM
01
ROD
08
MT
MT0012694970
2013
GO WAN US CANAL
01
ROD
02
NY
NYN000206222
2014
HANFORD 100-AREA (USDOE)
35
ROD
10
WA
WA3890090076
2014
HANFORD 300-AREA (USDOE)
04
ROD
10
WA
WA2890090077
2014
HEGELERZINC
03
ROD
05
IL
ILN000508134
2012
MADISON COUNTY MINES
05
ROD
07
MO
MOD098633415
2014
MADISON COUNTY MINES
03
ROD
07
MO
MOD098633415
2012
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION)
05
ROD
09
CA
CA4570024337
2013
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION)
07
ROD
09
CA
CA4570024337
2013
NORTH SANITARY LANDFILL
01
ROD
05
OH
OHD980611875
2013
ORONOGO-DUENWEG MINING BELT
01
ROD Amendment
07
MO
MOD980686281
2012
PADUCAH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT (USDOE)
19
ROD
04
KY
KY8890008982
2012
PICATINNY ARSENAL (USARMY)
15
ROD
02
NJ
NJ3210020704
2014
RINGWOOD MINES/LANDFILL
02
ROD
02
NJ
NJD980529739
2012
RIO TINTO COPPER MINE
01
ROD
09
NV
NV3141190030
2014
SHARON STEEL CORP (FARRELL WORKS DISPOSAL AREA)
02
ROD
03
PA
PAD001933175
2012
SOUTHWEST JEFFERSON COUNTY MINING
01
ROD
07
MO
MON000705443
2012
SOUTHWEST JEFFERSON COUNTY MINING
02
ROD
07
MO
MON000705443
2012
SOUTHWEST JEFFERSON COUNTY MINING
03
ROD
07
MO
MON000705443
2014
TEN-MILE DRAIN
01
ROD
05
Ml
MIN000510063
2013
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
07
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
Off site Disposal
2013
10TH STREET SITE
02
ROD Amendment
07
NE
NED981713837
2013
68TH STREET DUMP/INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES
01
ROD
03
MD
MDD980918387
July 2017
E-7
-------
Appendix E
Source Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
FY
Site Name
OU
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2012
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND (EDGEWOOD AREA)
37
ROD
03
MD
MD2210020036
2014
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND (EDGEWOOD AREA)
29
ROD
03
MD
MD2210020036
2014
ALLEGANY BALLISTICS LABORATORY (USNAVY)
04
ROD
03
WV
WV0170023691
2012
ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE
01
ROD
09
GU
GU6571999519
2012
ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE
01
ROD
09
GU
GU6571999519
2014
ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE
01
ROD
09
GU
GU6571999519
2014
BANGOR NAVAL SUBMARINE BASE
09
ROD
10
WA
WA5170027291
2012
CENTREDALE MANOR RESTORATION PROJECT
01
ROD
01
Rl
RID981203755
2013
CHEM-FAB
01
ROD
03
PA
PAD002323848
2014
CIDRA GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
02
PR
PRN000204538
2013
CONCORD NAVAL WEAPONS STATION
04
ROD
09
CA
CA7170024528
2012
CROWN CLEANERS OF WATERTOWN INC.
01
ROD
02
NY
NYD986965333
2014
DAVISVILLE NAVAL CONSTRUCTION BATTALION CENTER
09
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170022036
2012
DEFENSE GENERAL SUPPLY CENTER (DLA)
13
ROD
03
VA
VA3971520751
2012
DIAZ CHEMICAL
02
ROD
02
NY
NYD067532580
2014
EAGLE PICHER CAREFREE BATTERY
01
ROD
06
NM
NMD001829506
2012
EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE
02
ROD Amendment
09
CA
CA1570024504
2012
EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE
13
ROD
09
CA
CA1570024504
2014
FIRST PIEDMONT CORP. ROCK QUARRY (ROUTE 719)
01
ROD Amendment
03
VA
VAD980554984
2012
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE
17
ROD
03
MD
MD9210020567
2012
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE
20
ROD
03
MD
MD9210020567
2014
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE
09
ROD
03
MD
MD9210020567
2014
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE
18
ROD
03
MD
MD9210020567
2014
GMH ELECTRONICS
01
ROD
04
NC
NCN000410161
2013
HAMILTON/LABREE ROADS GW CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
10
WA
WASFN1002174
2014
HANFORD 100-AREA (USDOE)
35
ROD
10
WA
WA3890090076
2014
HANFORD 300-AREA (USDOE)
04
ROD
10
WA
WA2890090077
2014
HILL AIR FORCE BASE
13
ROD
08
UT
UT0571724350
2014
INDIAN HEAD NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER
24
ROD
03
MD
MD7170024684
July 2017
E-8
-------
Appendix E
Source Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
FY
Site Name
OU
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2014
INDUSTRI-PLEX
02
ESD
01
MA
MAD076580950
2013
JJ SEIFERT MACHINE
01
ROD
04
FL
FLN000410232
2012
LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE/NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER
28
ROD
03
VA
VA2800005033
2014
LITTLE VALLEY
02
ESD
02
NY
NY0001233634
2013
LOCKHEED WEST SEATTLE
01
ROD
10
WA
WAN001002655
2014
LOWER DARBY CREEK AREA
01
ROD
03
PA
PASFN0305521
2014
MADISON COUNTY MINES
03
ROD
07
MO
MOD098633415
2012
MAYWOOD CHEMICAL CO.
03
ROD
02
NJ
NJD980529762
2014
MAYWOOD CHEMICAL CO.
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJD980529762
2012
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION)
05
ROD
09
CA
CA4570024337
2012
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION)
17
ROD
09
CA
CA4570024337
2013
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION)
07
ROD
09
CA
CA4570024337
2012
NEW LONDON SUBMARINE BASE
04
ROD
01
CT
CTD980906515
2012
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
03
ESD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2012
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
07
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2013
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
11
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
05
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
06
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2013
NORTH SANITARY LANDFILL
01
ROD
05
OH
OHD980611875
2013
OKLAHOMA REFINING CO.
02
ROD
06
OK
OKD091598870
2012
OLD AMERICAN ZINC PLANT
02
ROD
05
IL
IL0000034355
2014
ONONDAGA LAKE
25
ROD
02
NY
NYD986913580
2013
ORLANDO GASIFICATION PLANT
01
ROD
04
FL
FLD984169235
2013
PEACH ORCHARD RD PCE GROUNDWATER PLUME SITE
01
ROD Amendment
04
GA
GAN000407449
2012
PICATINNY ARSENAL (USARMY)
15
ROD
02
NJ
NJ3210020704
2012
PLATTSBURGH AIR FORCE BASE
20
ROD
02
NY
NY4571924774
July 2017
E-9
-------
Appendix E
Source Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
FY
Site Name
ou
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2013
PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD
04
ROD
01
ME
ME7170022019
2013
PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD
05
ROD
01
ME
ME7170022019
2014
RADIATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.
03
ROD
02
NJ
NJD047684451
2013
RARITAN BAY SLAG
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJN000206276
2014
RINGWOOD MINES/LANDFILL
02
ROD
02
NJ
NJD980529739
2012
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ARSENAL (USARMY)
03
ESD
08
CO
C05210020769
2013
SANFORD DRY CLEANERS
01
ROD
04
FL
FLD032728032
SANGAMO ELECTRIC DUMP/CRAB ORCHARD NATIONAL WILDLIFE
2014
REFUGE (USDOI)
02
ROD Amendment
05
IL
IL8143609487
2013
SAVANNA ARMY DEPOT ACTIVITY
10
ROD
05
IL
IL3210020803
2013
SCOVILL INDUSTRIAL LANDFILL
01
ROD
01
CT
CT0002265551
2014
SHIELDALLOYCORP.
02
ROD
02
NJ
NJD002365930
2014
SOUTH CAVALCADE STREET
01
ROD Amendment
06
TX
TXD980810386
2012
SOUTHWEST JEFFERSON COUNTY MINING
01
ROD
07
MO
MON000705443
2012
SOUTHWEST JEFFERSON COUNTY MINING
02
ROD
07
MO
MON000705443
2012
SOUTHWEST JEFFERSON COUNTY MINING
03
ROD
07
MO
MON000705443
2012
SPECTRON, INC.
02
ROD
03
MD
MDD000218008
2013
STAR LAKE CANAL
01
ROD
06
TX
TX0001414341
2014
TEN-MILE DRAIN
01
ROD
05
Ml
MIN000510063
2013
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
07
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2014
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
05
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2014
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
10
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2013
U.S. SMELTER AND LEAD REFINERY, INC.
01
ROD
05
IN
IND047030226
2013
US NASA MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER
07
ROD
04
AL
AL1800013863
2014
VAN DER HORST USA CORPORATION
01
ROD
06
TX
TXD007357932
2012
VELSICOL CHEMICAL CORP. (MICHIGAN)
01
ROD
05
Ml
MID000722439
2013
WHITE SWAN LAUNDRY AND CLEANER INC.
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJSFN0204241
2012
WHITING FIELD NAVAL AIR STATION
27
ROD
04
FL
FL2170023244
2013
WOODBROOK ROAD DUMP
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJSFN0204260
July 2017
E-10
-------
Appendix E Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Source Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
FY
Site Name
OU
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2012 WPSC STEVENS POINT
01
ROD
05
Wl
WIN000509983
On site Containment
2013
68TH STREET DUMP/INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES
01
ROD
03
MD
MDD980918387
2012
ACE SERVICES
01
ESD
07
KS
KSD046746731
2014
ALAMEDA NAVAL AIR STATION
03
ROD Amendment
09
CA
CA2170023236
2012
ALCOA PROPERTIES
01
ROD
05
IL
ILSFN0508010
2012
AMERICAN CYANAMID CO
04
ROD
02
NJ
NJD002173276
2013
ANACONDA CO. SMELTER
16
ROD Amendment
08
MT
MTD093291656
2012
ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE
01
ROD
09
GU
GU6571999519
2012
ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE
01
ROD
09
GU
GU6571999519
2012
ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE
01
ROD
09
GU
GU6571999519
2013
BROOK INDUSTRIAL PARK
01
ESD
02
NJ
NJD078251675
2014
BRUNSWICK NAVAL AIR STATION
07
ESD
01
ME
ME8170022018
2012
BUNKER HILL MINING & METALLURGICAL COMPLEX
03
ROD Amendment
10
ID
IDD048340921
2013
CALLAHAN MINING CORP
01
ESD
01
ME
MED980524128
2013
CAMP LEJEUNE MILITARY RES. (USNAVY)
15
ROD
04
NC
NC6170022580
2012
CAPTAIN JACK MILL
01
ESD
08
CO
COD981551427
2012
CENTREDALE MANOR RESTORATION PROJECT
01
ROD
01
Rl
RID981203755
2014
CIDRA GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
02
PR
PRN000204538
2013
CONCORD NAVAL WEAPONS STATION
02
ROD
09
CA
CA7170024528
2012
COPPER BASIN MINING DISTRICT
03
ROD
04
TN
TN0001890839
2012
CROWN CLEANERS OF WATERTOWN INC.
01
ROD
02
NY
NYD986965333
2014
DAVISVILLE NAVAL CONSTRUCTION BATTALION CENTER
09
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170022036
2012
DIAZ CHEMICAL
02
ROD
02
NY
NYD067532580
2012
EAGLE ZINC CO DIV T L DIAMOND
02
ROD
05
IL
ILD980606941
2012
EASTERN MICHAUD FLATS CONTAMINATION
01
ROD Amendment
10
ID
IDD984666610
2012
EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE
02
ROD Amendment
09
CA
CA1570024504
2012
EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE
13
ROD
09
CA
CA1570024504
2012
FLAT CREEK IMM
01
ROD
08
MT
MT0012694970
July 2017
E-ll
-------
Appendix E
Source Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
FY
Site Name
OU
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2013
GARVEY ELEVATOR
01
ROD
07
NE
NEN000704351
2014
GILT EDGE MINE
01
ESD
08
SD
SDD987673985
2013
GO WAN US CANAL
01
ROD
02
NY
NYN000206222
2014
HANFORD 300-AREA (USDOE)
04
ROD
10
WA
WA2890090077
2014
HEGELERZINC
03
ROD
05
IL
ILN000508134
2012
LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE/NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER
28
ROD
03
VA
VA2800005033
2014
LCP CHEMICALS INC.
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJD079303020
2012
LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT (SE AREA)
12
ROD
03
PA
PA6213820503
2014
LOWER DARBY CREEK AREA
01
ROD
03
PA
PASFN0305521
2012
MADISON COUNTY MINES
05
ROD
07
MO
MOD098633415
2014
MADISON COUNTY MINES
03
ROD
07
MO
MOD098633415
2012
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION)
05
ROD
09
CA
CA4570024337
2012
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION)
17
ROD
09
CA
CA4570024337
2013
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION)
07
ROD
09
CA
CA4570024337
2014
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION)
06
ROD
09
CA
CA4570024337
2013
NEBRASKA ORDNANCE PLANT (FORMER)
05
ROD
07
NE
NE6211890011
2012
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
07
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
02
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
12
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
05
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2013
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. (SARATOGA SPRINGS PLANT)
02
ROD
02
NY
NYD980664361
2013
NORTH SANITARY LANDFILL
01
ROD
05
OH
OHD980611875
2013
OKLAHOMA REFINING CO.
02
ROD
06
OK
OKD091598870
2012
OLD AMERICAN ZINC PLANT
02
ROD
05
IL
IL0000034355
July 2017
E-12
-------
Appendix E
Source Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
FY
Site Name
ou
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2014
OLIN CORP. (MCINTOSH PLANT)
02
ROD
04
AL
ALD008188708
2013
ORLANDO GASIFICATION PLANT
01
ROD
04
FL
FLD984169235
2013
ORONOGO-DUENWEG MINING BELT
01
ROD Amendment
07
MO
MOD980686281
2013
OTTAWA RADIATION AREAS
06
ROD Amendment
05
IL
ILD980606750
2012
OUTBOARD MARINE CORP.
04
ESD
05
IL
ILD000802827
2013
OUTBOARD MARINE CORP.
04
ROD Amendment
05
IL
ILD000802827
2012
PEARL HARBOR NAVAL COMPLEX
17
ROD
09
HI
HI4170090076
2014
RINGWOOD MINES/LANDFILL
02
ROD
02
NJ
NJD980529739
2012
RIO TINTO COPPER MINE
01
ROD
09
NV
NV3141190030
2012
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ARSENAL (USARMY)
03
ESD
08
CO
C05210020769
2013
SALFORD QUARRY
01
ROD
03
PA
PAD980693204
2013
SCORPIO RECYCLING, INC.
02
ROD
02
PR
PRD987376662
2013
SCOVILL INDUSTRIAL LANDFILL
01
ROD
01
CT
CT0002265551
2014
SHARON STEEL CORP (FARRELL WORKS DISPOSAL AREA)
02
ROD
03
PA
PAD001933175
2014
SHIELDALLOYCORP.
02
ROD
02
NJ
NJD002365930
2012
SOUTHWEST JEFFERSON COUNTY MINING
01
ROD
07
MO
MON000705443
2012
SOUTHWEST JEFFERSON COUNTY MINING
02
ROD
07
MO
MON000705443
2012
SOUTHWEST JEFFERSON COUNTY MINING
03
ROD
07
MO
MON000705443
2012
SPECTRON, INC.
02
ROD
03
MD
MDD000218008
2013
STAR LAKE CANAL
01
ROD
06
TX
TX0001414341
2014
TEN-MILE DRAIN
01
ROD
05
Ml
MIN000510063
2013
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
07
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2014
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
05
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2014
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
10
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2012
TRI-CITY DISPOSAL CO.
01
ESD
04
KY
KYD981028350
2013
UNITED NUCLEAR CORP.
02
ROD
06
NM
NMD030443303
2012
VELSICOL CHEMICAL CORP. (HARDEMAN COUNTY)
02
ROD Amendment
04
TN
TND980559033
2012
VELSICOL CHEMICAL CORP. (MICHIGAN)
01
ROD
05
Ml
MID000722439
2012
WPSC STEVENS POINT
01
ROD
05
Wl
WIN000509983
July 2017
E-13
-------
Appendix E
Source Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
FY
Site Name
OU
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
Vertical Engineered Barrier
2014
ALAMEDA NAVAL AIR STATION
03
ROD Amendment
09
CA
CA2170023236
2012
BUNKER HILL MINING & METALLURGICAL COMPLEX
03
ROD Amendment
10
ID
IDD048340921
2014
LCP CHEMICALS INC.
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJD079303020
2013
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. (SARATOGA SPRINGS PLANT)
02
ROD
02
NY
NYD980664361
2013
ORLANDO GASIFICATION PLANT
01
ROD
04
FL
FLD984169235
2013
OUTBOARD MARINE CORP.
04
ROD Amendment
05
IL
ILD000802827
2012
PADUCAH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT (USDOE)
19
ROD
04
KY
KY8890008982
2014
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
05
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
MONITORED NATURAL RECOVERY/ENHANCED MONITORED NATURAL RECOVERY
Enhanced Monitored Natural Recovery
2013
LOCKHEED WEST SEATTLE
01
ROD
10
WA
WAN001002655
2014
ONONDAGA LAKE
02
ESD
02
NY
NYD986913580
Monitored Natural Recovery
2014
LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT (PDO AREA)
02
ROD
03
PA
PA2210090054
2012
MADISON COUNTY MINES
05
ROD
07
MO
MOD098633415
2013
STAR LAKE CANAL
01
ROD
06
TX
TX0001414341
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS
2013
68TH STREET DUMP/INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES
01
ROD
03
MD
MDD980918387
2012
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND (EDGEWOOD AREA)
37
ROD
03
MD
MD2210020036
2013
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND (EDGEWOOD AREA)
48
ROD
03
MD
MD2210020036
2014
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND (EDGEWOOD AREA)
29
ROD
03
MD
MD2210020036
2013
AIR FORCE PLANT PJKS
01
ROD
08
CO
C07570090038
2014
ALAMEDA NAVAL AIR STATION
03
ROD Amendment
09
CA
CA2170023236
2014
ALAMEDA NAVAL AIR STATION
08
ROD
09
CA
CA2170023236
2012
ALCOA PROPERTIES
01
ROD
05
IL
ILSFN0508010
2014
ALLEGANY BALLISTICS LABORATORY (USNAVY)
04
ROD
03
WV
WV0170023691
2012
AMERICAN CYANAMID CO
04
ROD
02
NJ
NJD002173276
July 2017
E-14
-------
Appendix E
Source Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
FY
Site Name
OU
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2012
ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE
01
ROD
09
GU
GU6571999519
2014
ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE
01
ROD
09
GU
GU6571999519
2013
BANDERA ROAD GROUND WATER PLUME
01
ROD
06
TX
TXN000606565
2013
BROOK INDUSTRIAL PARK
01
ESD
02
NJ
NJD078251675
2012
BUNKER HILL MINING & METALLURGICAL COMPLEX
03
ROD Amendment
10
ID
IDD048340921
2013
CALIFORNIA GULCH
04
ESD
08
CO
COD980717938
2013
CALIFORNIA GULCH
10
ESD
08
CO
COD980717938
2014
CALIFORNIA GULCH
03
ESD
08
CO
COD980717938
2013
CAMP LEJEUNE MILITARY RES. (USNAVY)
12
ROD
04
NC
NC6170022580
2013
CAMP LEJEUNE MILITARY RES. (USNAVY)
15
ROD
04
NC
NC6170022580
2012
CENTREDALE MANOR RESTORATION PROJECT
01
ROD
01
Rl
RID981203755
2014
CIDRA GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
02
PR
PRN000204538
2013
CONCORD NAVAL WEAPONS STATION
04
ROD
09
CA
CA7170024528
2012
COPPER BASIN MINING DISTRICT
03
ROD
04
TN
TN0001890839
2012
CROWN CLEANERS OF WATERTOWN INC.
01
ROD
02
NY
NYD986965333
2013
CURTIS BAY COAST GUARD YARD
04
ROD
03
MD
MD4690307844
2014
DAVISVILLE NAVAL CONSTRUCTION BATTALION CENTER
09
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170022036
2012
DEFENSE GENERAL SUPPLY CENTER (DLA)
13
ROD
03
VA
VA3971520751
2012
DIAZ CHEMICAL
02
ROD
02
NY
NYD067532580
2013
DIXIE CAVERNS COUNTY LANDFILL
02
ESD
03
VA
VAD980552095
2012
EAGLE ZINC CO DIV T L DIAMOND
02
ROD
05
IL
ILD980606941
2012
EASTERN MICHAUD FLATS CONTAMINATION
01
ROD Amendment
10
ID
IDD984666610
2012
EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE
13
ROD
09
CA
CA1570024504
2013
EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE
11
ESD
09
CA
CA1570024504
2014
FIRST PIEDMONT CORP. ROCK QUARRY (ROUTE 719)
01
ROD Amendment
03
VA
VAD980554984
2012
FLAT CREEK IMM
01
ROD
08
MT
MT0012694970
2013
FLORIDA STEEL CORP.
02
ESD
04
FL
FLD050432251
2012
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE
17
ROD
03
MD
MD9210020567
2012
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE
20
ROD
03
MD
MD9210020567
July 2017
E-15
-------
Appendix E
Source Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
FY
Site Name
ou
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2014
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE
13
ROD
03
MD
MD9210020567
2014
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE
18
ROD
03
MD
MD9210020567
2014
FORT WAINWRIGHT
07
ROD
10
AK
AK6210022426
2013
GO WAN US CANAL
01
ROD
02
NY
NYN000206222
2012
GRIFFISS AIR FORCE BASE (11 AREAS)
04
ROD
02
NY
NY4571924451
2012
GRIFFISS AIR FORCE BASE (11 AREAS)
07
ROD
02
NY
NY4571924451
2013
HAMILTON/LABREE ROADS GW CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
10
WA
WASFN1002174
2014
HANFORD 100-AREA (USDOE)
35
ROD
10
WA
WA3890090076
2014
HANFORD 300-AREA (USDOE)
04
ROD
10
WA
WA2890090077
2014
HEGELERZINC
03
ROD
05
IL
ILN000508134
2014
HILL AIR FORCE BASE
13
ROD
08
UT
UT0571724350
2012
HOOKER (HYDE PARK)
01
ESD
02
NY
NYD000831644
2014
INDIAN HEAD NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER
03
ROD
03
MD
MD7170024684
2014
INDIAN HEAD NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER
24
ROD
03
MD
MD7170024684
2014
JACKSON PARK HOUSING COMPLEX (USNAVY)
05
ROD
10
WA
WA3170090044
2013
JJ SEIFERT MACHINE
01
ROD
04
FL
FLN000410232
2012
LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE/NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER
28
ROD
03
VA
VA2800005033
2014
LCP CHEMICALS INC.
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJD079303020
2014
LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT (PDO AREA)
02
ROD
03
PA
PA2210090054
2012
LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT (SE AREA)
12
ROD
03
PA
PA6213820503
2012
LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT (SE AREA)
21
ROD
03
PA
PA6213820503
2014
LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT (SE AREA)
28
ROD
03
PA
PA6213820503
2013
LOCKHEED WEST SEATTLE
01
ROD
10
WA
WAN001002655
2014
LOWER DARBY CREEK AREA
01
ROD
03
PA
PASFN0305521
2012
MADISON COUNTY MINES
05
ROD
07
MO
MOD098633415
2014
MADISON COUNTY MINES
03
ROD
07
MO
MOD098633415
2014
MATTIACE PETROCHEMICAL CO., INC.
01
ROD Amendment
02
NY
NYD000512459
2012
MAYWOOD CHEMICAL CO.
03
ROD
02
NJ
NJD980529762
2014
MAYWOOD CHEMICAL CO.
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJD980529762
July 2017
E-16
-------
Appendix E
Source Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
FY
Site Name
OU
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2012
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION)
05
ROD
09
CA
CA4570024337
2012
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION)
17
ROD
09
CA
CA4570024337
2013
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION)
07
ROD
09
CA
CA4570024337
2014
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION)
06
ROD
09
CA
CA4570024337
2014
MILAN ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT
05
ROD
04
TN
TN0210020582
2014
NATIONAL FIREWORKS
02
ROD
04
TN
TNSFN0407047
2013
NEBRASKA ORDNANCE PLANT (FORMER)
05
ROD
07
NE
NE6211890011
2014
NEW BRIGHTON/ARDEN HILLS/TCAAP (USARMY)
07
ROD Amendment
05
MN
MN7213820908
2012
NEW LONDON SUBMARINE BASE
04
ROD
01
CT
CTD980906515
2013
NEW LYME LANDFILL
01
ESD
05
OH
OHD980794614
2012
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
07
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2013
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
11
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
02
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
05
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
06
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
12
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2013
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. (SARATOGA SPRINGS PLANT)
02
ROD
02
NY
NYD980664361
2014
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY (LOT 86, FARM UNIT #1)
01
ESD
04
NC
NCD980557656
2013
NORTH SANITARY LANDFILL
01
ROD
05
OH
OHD980611875
2013
OKLAHOMA REFINING CO.
02
ROD
06
OK
OKD091598870
2012
OLD AMERICAN ZINC PLANT
02
ROD
05
IL
IL0000034355
2014
OLEAN WELL FIELD
02
ROD Amendment
02
NY
NYD980528657
2014
OLIN CORP. (MCINTOSH PLANT)
02
ROD
04
AL
ALD008188708
2014
ONONDAGA LAKE
25
ROD
02
NY
NYD986913580
July 2017
E-17
-------
Appendix E
Source Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
FY
Site Name
ou
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2013
ORLANDO GASIFICATION PLANT
01
ROD
04
FL
FLD984169235
2013
OTIS AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE/CAMP EDWARDS
07
ESD
01
MA
MA2570024487
2012
OTTAWA RADIATION AREAS
06
ESD
05
IL
ILD980606750
2013
OTTAWA RADIATION AREAS
06
ROD Amendment
05
IL
ILD980606750
2012
OUTBOARD MARINE CORP.
04
ESD
05
IL
ILD000802827
2013
OUTBOARD MARINE CORP.
04
ROD Amendment
05
IL
ILD000802827
2012
PADUCAH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT (USDOE)
19
ROD
04
KY
KY8890008982
2012
PEARL HARBOR NAVAL COMPLEX
17
ROD
09
HI
HI4170090076
2014
PEARL HARBOR NAVAL COMPLEX
24
ROD
09
HI
HI4170090076
2013
PEOPLES NATURAL GAS CO.
01
ROD Amendment
07
IA
IAD980852578
2012
PICATINNY ARSENAL (USARMY)
15
ROD
02
NJ
NJ3210020704
2013
PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD
05
ROD
01
ME
ME7170022019
2013
PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD
07
ROD
01
ME
ME7170022019
2014
RINGWOOD MINES/LANDFILL
02
ROD
02
NJ
NJD980529739
2012
RIO TINTO COPPER MINE
01
ROD
09
NV
NV3141190030
2013
ROSE TOWNSHIP DUMP
01
ESD
05
Ml
MID980499842
2013
SALFORD QUARRY
01
ROD
03
PA
PAD980693204
2013
SANFORD DRY CLEANERS
01
ROD
04
FL
FLD032728032
2012
SAVANNA ARMY DEPOT ACTIVITY
08
ROD
05
IL
IL3210020803
2012
SAVANNAH RIVER SITE (USDOE)
35
ESD
04
SC
SC1890008989
2013
SAVANNAH RIVER SITE (USDOE)
48
ROD
04
SC
SC1890008989
2013
SCORPIO RECYCLING, INC.
02
ROD
02
PR
PRD987376662
2013
SCOVILL INDUSTRIAL LANDFILL
01
ROD
01
CT
CT0002265551
2014
SHARON STEEL CORP (FARRELL WORKS DISPOSAL AREA)
02
ROD
03
PA
PAD001933175
2014
SHIELDALLOYCORP.
02
ROD
02
NJ
NJD002365930
2013
SOMERSWORTH SANITARY LANDFILL
01
ESD
01
NH
NHD980520225
2012
SOUTHWEST JEFFERSON COUNTY MINING
01
ROD
07
MO
MON000705443
2012
SOUTHWEST JEFFERSON COUNTY MINING
02
ROD
07
MO
MON000705443
2012
SOUTHWEST JEFFERSON COUNTY MINING
03
ROD
07
MO
MON000705443
July 2017
E-18
-------
Appendix E
Source Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
FY
Site Name
OU
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2012
SPECTRON, INC.
02
ROD
03
MD
MDD000218008
2013
STAR LAKE CANAL
01
ROD
06
TX
TX0001414341
2012
STAUFFER CHEMICAL CO. (COLD CREEK PLANT)
02
ESD
04
AL
ALD095688875
2012
STRASBURG LANDFILL
00
ESD
03
PA
PAD000441337
2014
TEN-MILE DRAIN
01
ROD
05
Ml
MIN000510063
2014
TINKER AIR FORCE BASE (SOLDIER CREEK/BUILDING 3001)
01
ROD
06
OK
OK1571724391
2014
TOMAH ARMORY
01
ESD
05
Wl
WID980610299
2013
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
07
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2014
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
05
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2014
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
10
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2013
U.S. SMELTER AND LEAD REFINERY, INC.
01
ROD
05
IN
IND047030226
2013
UNITED NUCLEAR CORP.
02
ROD
06
NM
NMD030443303
2014
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA (ROSEMOUNT RESEARCH CENTER)
03
ESD
05
MN
MND980613780
2013
US NASA MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER
07
ROD
04
AL
AL1800013863
2014
VAN DER HORST USA CORPORATION
01
ROD
06
TX
TXD007357932
2012
VELSICOL CHEMICAL CORP. (MICHIGAN)
01
ROD
05
Ml
MID000722439
2012
WHITING FIELD NAVAL AIR STATION
27
ROD
04
FL
FL2170023244
2013
WOODBROOK ROAD DUMP
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJSFN0204260
2012
WPSC STEVENS POINT
01
ROD
05
Wl
WIN000509983
OTHER REMEDIES
Fencing and Signs
2013
68TH STREET DUMP/INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES
01
ROD
03
MD
MDD980918387
2014
ALAMEDA NAVAL AIR STATION
08
ROD
09
CA
CA2170023236
2013
BANDERA ROAD GROUND WATER PLUME
01
ROD
06
TX
TXN000606565
2014
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE
13
ROD
03
MD
MD9210020567
2012
LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE/NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER
28
ROD
03
VA
VA2800005033
2014
LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT (PDO AREA)
02
ROD
03
PA
PA2210090054
2014
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION)
06
ROD
09
CA
CA4570024337
July 2017
E-19
-------
Appendix E
Source Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
FY
Site Name
OU
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2013
OKLAHOMA REFINING CO.
02
ROD
06
OK
OKD091598870
2014
OLIN CORP. (MCINTOSH PLANT)
02
ROD
04
AL
ALD008188708
2014
PEARL HARBOR NAVAL COMPLEX
24
ROD
09
HI
HI4170090076
2014
RINGWOOD MINES/LANDFILL
02
ROD
02
NJ
NJD980529739
2013
SAVANNAH RIVER SITE (USDOE)
48
ROD
04
SC
SC1890008989
2014
SHIELDALLOYCORP.
02
ROD
02
NJ
NJD002365930
2013
U.S. SMELTER AND LEAD REFINERY, INC.
01
ROD
05
IN
IND047030226
2014
VAN DER HORST USA CORPORATION
01
ROD
06
TX
TXD007357932
pabitat Restoration
2013 HAMILTON/LABREE ROADS GW CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
10
WA
WASFN1002174
(evegetation
2012
EAGLE ZINC CO DIV T L DIAMOND
02
ROD
05
IL
ILD980606941
2014
FIRST PIEDMONT CORP. ROCK QUARRY (ROUTE 719)
01
ROD Amendment
03
VA
VAD980554984
2012
MADISON COUNTY MINES
05
ROD
07
MO
MOD098633415
2014
ONONDAGA LAKE
02
ESD
02
NY
NYD986913580
2012
PLATTSBURGH AIR FORCE BASE
20
ROD
02
NY
NY4571924774
f horeline Stabilization
2013
68TH STREET DUMP/INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES
01
ROD
03
MD
MDD980918387
2013
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
07
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2014
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
05
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
ftream Realignment
2013 HAMILTON/LABREE ROADS GW CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
10
WA
WASFN1002174
|\/etlands Replacement
2012
CENTREDALE MANOR RESTORATION PROJECT
01
ROD
01
Rl
RID981203755
2014
LCP CHEMICALS INC.
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJD079303020
2013
NORTH SANITARY LANDFILL
01
ROD
05
OH
OHD980611875
2013
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
07
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
|\/etlands Restoration
2014 FIRST PIEDMONT CORP. ROCK QUARRY (ROUTE 719)
01
ROD Amendment
03
VA
VAD980554984
July 2017
E-20
-------
Appendix E
Source Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
FY
Site Name
OU
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2014
INDUSTRI-PLEX
02
ESD
01
MA
MAD076580950
2012
LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE/NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER
28
ROD
03
VA
VA2800005033
2014
LCP CHEMICALS INC.
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJD079303020
2014
MAYWOOD CHEMICAL CO.
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJD980529762
2014
ONONDAGA LAKE
25
ROD
02
NY
NYD986913580
2012
PLATTSBURGH AIR FORCE BASE
20
ROD
02
NY
NY4571924774
2014
RINGWOOD MINES/LANDFILL
02
ROD
02
NJ
NJD980529739
July 2017
E-21
-------
Appendix F
Sediment Remedies Selected in Decision Documents
from FY 2012-2014
-------
Appendix F
Sediment Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
FY
Site Name
OU
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
|reatment
Bioremediation (In Situ)
2013 HAMILTON/LABREE ROADS GW CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
10
WA
WASFN1002174
|!ap (Amended, In Situ)
2013
CONCORD NAVAL WEAPONS STATION
02
ROD
09
CA
CA7170024528
2013
GOWANUS CANAL
01
ROD
02
NY
NYN000206222
2014
OLIN CORP. (MCINTOSH PLANT)
02
ROD
04
AL
ALD008188708
jhemical Treatment (Ex Situ)
2013 HAMILTON/LABREE ROADS GW CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
10
WA
WASFN1002174
ficineration (Off site)
2012 CENTREDALE MANOR RESTORATION PROJECT
01
ROD
01
Rl
RID981203755
Neutralization (Ex situ)
2013 OKLAHOMA REFINING CO.
02
ROD
06
OK
OKD091598870
physical Separation (Ex Situ)
2013
68TH STREET DUMP/INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES
01
ROD
03
MD
MDD980918387
2012
CENTREDALE MANOR RESTORATION PROJECT
01
ROD
01
Rl
RID981203755
2014
INDUSTRI-PLEX
02
ESD
01
MA
MAD076580950
2013
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION)
07
ROD
09
CA
CA4570024337
2012
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
07
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
05
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
06
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
ONONDAGA LAKE
25
ROD
02
NY
NYD986913580
2013
PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD
04
ROD
01
ME
ME7170022019
2014
SHIELDALLOYCORP.
02
ROD
02
NJ
NJD002365930
2013
STAR LAKE CANAL
01
ROD
06
TX
TX0001414341
2013
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
07
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
Recycling (Ex Situ)
2013 GOWANUS CANAL
01
ROD
02
NY
NYN000206222
July 2017
F-l
-------
Appendix F
Sediment Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
FY
Site Name
ou
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
§olidification/Stabilization (Ex Situ)
2013
GOWANUS CANAL
01
ROD
02
NY
NYN000206222
2012
WPSC STEVENS POINT
01
ROD
05
Wl
WIN000509983
Jolidification/Stabilization (In Situ)
2013 GOWANUS CANAL
01
ROD
02
NY
NYN000206222
Thermal Desorption (Ex Situ)
2013 GOWANUS CANAL
01
ROD
02
NY
NYN000206222
[hernial Treatment (In Situ)
2013 HAMILTON/LABREE ROADS GW CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
10
WA
WASFN1002174
|jnspecified Ex Situ treatment (Off site)
2012 CROWN CLEANERS OF WATERTOWN INC.
01
ROD
02
NY
NYD986965333
|>REDGING, DISPOSAL AND CONTAINMENT
gapping (Ex Situ)
2013
68TH STREET DUMP/INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES
01
ROD
03
MD
MDD980918387
2012
EAGLE ZINC CO DIV T L DIAMOND
02
ROD
05
IL
ILD980606941
2013
GOWANUS CANAL
01
ROD
02
NY
NYN000206222
2012
MADISON COUNTY MINES
05
ROD
07
MO
MOD098633415
2013
OKLAHOMA REFINING CO.
02
ROD
06
OK
OKD091598870
2012
OUTBOARD MARINE CORP.
04
ESD
05
IL
ILD000802827
lapping (1
n Situ)
2012
CENTREDALE MANOR RESTORATION PROJECT
01
ROD
01
Rl
RID981203755
2013
CONCORD NAVAL WEAPONS STATION
02
ROD
09
CA
CA7170024528
2012
COPPER BASIN MINING DISTRICT
03
ROD
04
TN
TN0001890839
2013
GOWANUS CANAL
01
ROD
02
NY
NYN000206222
2014
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
05
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
OLIN CORP. (MCINTOSH PLANT)
02
ROD
04
AL
ALD008188708
2013
STAR LAKE CANAL
01
ROD
06
TX
TX0001414341
2012
WPSC STEVENS POINT
01
ROD
05
Wl
WIN000509983
July 2017
F-2
-------
Appendix F Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Sediment Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
FY
Site Name
OU
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
Containment Cell (Subaqueous)
2014 LCP CHEMICALS INC.
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJD079303020
Containment Cell (Upland/Adjacent)
2012
CENTREDALE MANOR RESTORATION PROJECT
01
ROD
01
Rl
RID981203755
2013
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION)
07
ROD
09
CA
CA4570024337
2013
SALFORD QUARRY
01
ROD
03
PA
PAD980693204
Dredging/Excavation
2013
68TH STREET DUMP/INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES
01
ROD
03
MD
MDD980918387
2012
CENTREDALE MANOR RESTORATION PROJECT
01
ROD
01
Rl
RID981203755
2012
CROWN CLEANERS OF WATERTOWN INC.
01
ROD
02
NY
NYD986965333
2012
EAGLE ZINC CO DIV T L DIAMOND
02
ROD
05
IL
ILD980606941
2014
FIRST PIEDMONT CORP. ROCK QUARRY (ROUTE 719)
01
ROD Amendment
03
VA
VAD980554984
2013
GO WAN US CANAL
01
ROD
02
NY
NYN000206222
2013
HAMILTON/LABREE ROADS GW CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
10
WA
WASFN1002174
2014
INDUSTRI-PLEX
02
ESD
01
MA
MAD076580950
2012
LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE/NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER
28
ROD
03
VA
VA2800005033
2014
LCP CHEMICALS INC.
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJD079303020
2013
LOCKHEED WEST SEATTLE
01
ROD
10
WA
WAN001002655
2012
MADISON COUNTY MINES
05
ROD
07
MO
MOD098633415
2013
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION)
07
ROD
09
CA
CA4570024337
2012
NEW LONDON SUBMARINE BASE
04
ROD
01
CT
CTD980906515
2012
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
07
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
05
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
06
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2013
OKLAHOMA REFINING CO.
02
ROD
06
OK
OKD091598870
2014
ONONDAGA LAKE
25
ROD
02
NY
NYD986913580
2012
OUTBOARD MARINE CORP.
04
ESD
05
IL
ILD000802827
July 2017
F-3
-------
Appendix F
Sediment Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
FY
Site Name
ou
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2012
PLATTSBURGH AIR FORCE BASE
20
ROD
02
NY
NY4571924774
2013
PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD
04
ROD
01
ME
ME7170022019
2013
RARITAN BAY SLAG
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJN000206276
2013
SALFORD QUARRY
01
ROD
03
PA
PAD980693204
2014
SHIELDALLOYCORP.
02
ROD
02
NJ
NJD002365930
2013
STAR LAKE CANAL
01
ROD
06
TX
TX0001414341
2013
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
07
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2014
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
05
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2013
US NASA MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER
07
ROD
04
AL
AL1800013863
2014
VAN DER HORST USA CORPORATION
01
ROD
06
TX
TXD007357932
2012
WPSC STEVENS POINT
01
ROD
05
Wl
WIN000509983
|)ff site Disposal
2013
68TH STREET DUMP/INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES
01
ROD
03
MD
MDD980918387
2012
CENTREDALE MANOR RESTORATION PROJECT
01
ROD
01
Rl
RID981203755
2012
CROWN CLEANERS OF WATERTOWN INC.
01
ROD
02
NY
NYD986965333
2014
FIRST PIEDMONT CORP. ROCK QUARRY (ROUTE 719)
01
ROD Amendment
03
VA
VAD980554984
2013
HAMILTON/LABREE ROADS GW CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
10
WA
WASFN1002174
2014
INDUSTRI-PLEX
02
ESD
01
MA
MAD076580950
2012
LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE/NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER
28
ROD
03
VA
VA2800005033
2013
LOCKHEED WEST SEATTLE
01
ROD
10
WA
WAN001002655
2013
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION)
07
ROD
09
CA
CA4570024337
2012
NEW LONDON SUBMARINE BASE
04
ROD
01
CT
CTD980906515
2012
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
07
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
05
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
06
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
ONONDAGA LAKE
25
ROD
02
NY
NYD986913580
2012
PLATTSBURGH AIR FORCE BASE
20
ROD
02
NY
NY4571924774
2013
PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD
04
ROD
01
ME
ME7170022019
July 2017
F-4
-------
Appendix F
Sediment Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
FY
Site Name
ou
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2013
RARITAN BAY SLAG
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJN000206276
2014
SHIELDALLOYCORP.
02
ROD
02
NJ
NJD002365930
2013
STAR LAKE CANAL
01
ROD
06
TX
TX0001414341
2013
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
07
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2014
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
05
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2013
US NASA MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER
07
ROD
04
AL
AL1800013863
2014
VAN DER HORST USA CORPORATION
01
ROD
06
TX
TXD007357932
2012
WPSC STEVENS POINT
01
ROD
05
Wl
WIN000509983
ENHANCED MONITORED NATURAL RECOVERY
2013
LOCKHEED WEST SEATTLE
01
ROD
10
WA
WAN001002655
2014
ONONDAGA LAKE
02
ESD
02
NY
NYD986913580
MONITORED NATURAL RECOVERY
2014
LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT (PDO AREA)
02
ROD
03
PA
PA2210090054
2012
MADISON COUNTY MINES
05
ROD
07
MO
MOD098633415
2013
STAR LAKE CANAL
01
ROD
06
TX
TX0001414341
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS
2013
68TH STREET DUMP/INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES
01
ROD
03
MD
MDD980918387
2012
CENTREDALE MANOR RESTORATION PROJECT
01
ROD
01
Rl
RID981203755
2012
COPPER BASIN MINING DISTRICT
03
ROD
04
TN
TN0001890839
2012
CROWN CLEANERS OF WATERTOWN INC.
01
ROD
02
NY
NYD986965333
2012
EAGLE ZINC CO DIV T L DIAMOND
02
ROD
05
IL
ILD980606941
2014
FIRST PIEDMONT CORP. ROCK QUARRY (ROUTE 719)
01
ROD Amendment
03
VA
VAD980554984
2013
FLORIDA STEEL CORP.
02
ESD
04
FL
FLD050432251
2013
GO WAN US CANAL
01
ROD
02
NY
NYN000206222
2013
HAMILTON/LABREE ROADS GW CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
10
WA
WASFN1002174
2014
LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT (PDO AREA)
02
ROD
03
PA
PA2210090054
2012
LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT (SE AREA)
12
ROD
03
PA
PA6213820503
2013
LOCKHEED WEST SEATTLE
01
ROD
10
WA
WAN001002655
2012
MADISON COUNTY MINES
05
ROD
07
MO
MOD098633415
July 2017
F-5
-------
Appendix F
Sediment Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
FY
Site Name
OU
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2013
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION)
07
ROD
09
CA
CA4570024337
2012
NEW LONDON SUBMARINE BASE
04
ROD
01
CT
CTD980906515
2012
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
07
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
05
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2013
OKLAHOMA REFINING CO.
02
ROD
06
OK
OKD091598870
2014
OLIN CORP. (MCINTOSH PLANT)
02
ROD
04
AL
ALD008188708
2014
ONONDAGA LAKE
25
ROD
02
NY
NYD986913580
2012
OUTBOARD MARINE CORP.
04
ESD
05
IL
ILD000802827
2013
SALFORD QUARRY
01
ROD
03
PA
PAD980693204
2012
SAVANNAH RIVER SITE (USDOE)
35
ESD
04
SC
SC1890008989
2013
STAR LAKE CANAL
01
ROD
06
TX
TX0001414341
2013
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
07
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2014
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
05
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
|)THER REMEDIES
fencing and Signs
2013
68TH STREET DUMP/INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES
01
ROD
03
MD
MDD980918387
2013
OKLAHOMA REFINING CO.
02
ROD
06
OK
OKD091598870
2014
OLIN CORP. (MCINTOSH PLANT)
02
ROD
04
AL
ALD008188708
pabitat Restoration
2013 HAMILTON/LABREE ROADS GW CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
10
WA
WASFN1002174
(evegetation
2012
EAGLE ZINC CO DIV T L DIAMOND
02
ROD
05
IL
ILD980606941
2014
FIRST PIEDMONT CORP. ROCK QUARRY (ROUTE 719)
01
ROD Amendment
03
VA
VAD980554984
2012
MADISON COUNTY MINES
05
ROD
07
MO
MOD098633415
2014
ONONDAGA LAKE
02
ESD
02
NY
NYD986913580
2012
PLATTSBURGH AIR FORCE BASE
20
ROD
02
NY
NY4571924774
fhoreline Stabilization
2013 68TH STREET DUMP/INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES
01
ROD
03
MD
MDD980918387
July 2017
F-6
-------
Appendix F
Sediment Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
FY
Site Name
OU
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2013
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
07
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2014
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
05
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
ftream Realignment
2013 HAMILTON/LABREE ROADS GW CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
10
WA
WASFN1002174
|\/etlands Replacement
2012
CENTREDALE MANOR RESTORATION PROJECT
01
ROD
01
Rl
RID981203755
2014
LCP CHEMICALS INC.
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJD079303020
2013
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
07
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
|\/etlands Restoration
2014
FIRST PIEDMONT CORP. ROCK QUARRY (ROUTE 719)
01
ROD Amendment
03
VA
VAD980554984
2014
INDUSTRI-PLEX
02
ESD
01
MA
MAD076580950
2012
LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE/NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER
28
ROD
03
VA
VA2800005033
2014
LCP CHEMICALS INC.
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJD079303020
2014
ONONDAGA LAKE
25
ROD
02
NY
NYD986913580
2012
PLATTSBURGH AIR FORCE BASE
20
ROD
02
NY
NY4571924774
July 2017
F-7
-------
Appendix G
Groundwater Remedies Selected in Decision Documents
from FY 2012-2014
-------
Appendix G Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Groundwater Remedies Selected in Decision Documents From FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
FY
Site Name
ou
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
EX SITU TREATMENT (P&T)
2013
10TH STREET SITE
02
ROD Amendment
07
NE
NED981713837
2013
68TH STREET DUMP/INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES
01
ROD
03
MD
MDD980918387
2012
ABERDEEN CONTAMINATED GROUND WATER
01
ROD
04
NC
NCN000407447
2012
ACE SERVICES
01
ESD
07
KS
KSD046746731
2012
AMERICAN CYANAMID CO
04
ROD
02
NJ
NJD002173276
2014
BREWER GOLD MINE
01
ROD
04
SC
SCD987577913
2013
BROOK INDUSTRIAL PARK
01
ESD
02
NJ
NJD078251675
2012
BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY (USDOE)
03
ESD
02
NY
NY7890008975
2012
BUNKER HILL MINING & METALLURGICAL COMPLEX
03
ROD Amendment
10
ID
IDD048340921
2013
CAYUGA GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION SITE
01
ROD
02
NY
NYN000204289
2012
CLEBURN STREET WELL
02
ROD Amendment
07
NE
NED981499312
2012
DIAZ CHEMICAL
02
ROD
02
NY
NYD067532580
2014
EAGLE PICHER CAREFREE BATTERY
01
ROD
06
NM
NMD001829506
2012
EASTERN MICHAUD FLATS CONTAMINATION
01
ROD Amendment
10
ID
IDD984666610
2013
FMC CORP. (FRIDLEY PLANT)
01
ESD
05
MN
MND006481543
2013
GARVEY ELEVATOR
02
ROD
07
NE
NEN000704351
2012
HANFORD 200-AREA (USDOE)
49
ROD
10
WA
WA1890090078
2014
HILL AIR FORCE BASE
06
ESD
08
UT
UT0571724350
2012
INDIAN BEND WASH AREA
08
ESD
09
AZ
AZD980695969
2012
INTERSTATE LEAD CO. (ILCO)
02
ROD Amendment
04
AL
ALD041906173
2013
JACKSON PARK HOUSING COMPLEX (USNAVY)
01
ROD Amendment
10
WA
WA3170090044
2014
LCP CHEMICALS INC.
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJD079303020
2012
MAUNABO URBANO PUBLIC WELLS
01
ROD
02
PR
PRN000205831
2014
MILAN ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT
06
ROD
04
TN
TN0210020582
2013
NEW CASSEL/HICKSVILLE GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
02
NY
NY0001095363
2013
OGDEN DEFENSE DEPOT (DLA)
04
ESD
08
UT
UT9210020922
2013
OUTBOARD MARINE CORP.
04
ROD Amendment
05
IL
ILD000802827
2013
PEOPLES NATURAL GAS CO.
01
ROD Amendment
07
IA
IAD980852578
July 2017
G-l
-------
Appendix G Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Groundwater Remedies Selected in Decision Documents From FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
FY
Site Name
OU
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2014
PHOENIX-GOODYEAR AIRPORT AREA
01
ROD Amendment
09
AZ
AZD980695902
2014
PLATTSBURGH AIR FORCE BASE
06
ROD
02
NY
NY4571924774
2014
QUEEN CITY FARMS
01
ESD
10
WA
WAD980511745
2012
REFUSE HIDEAWAY LANDFILL
01
ESD
05
Wl
WID980610604
2012
SPECTRON, INC.
02
ROD
03
MD
MDD000218008
2014
TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE
06
ROD
09
CA
CA5570024575
2013
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
07
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2012
VELSICOL CHEMICAL CORP. (MICHIGAN)
01
ROD
05
Ml
MID000722439
2013
WHITE SWAN LAUNDRY AND CLEANER INC.
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJSFN0204241
IN SITU TREATMENT
Air Sparging
2013
CAMP LEJEUNE MILITARY RES. (USNAVY)
17
ROD
04
NC
NC6170022580
2012
MAUNABO URBANO PUBLIC WELLS
01
ROD
02
PR
PRN000205831
2014
VERONA WELL FIELD
02
ESD
05
Ml
MID980793806
2013
WHITE SWAN LAUNDRY AND CLEANER INC.
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJSFN0204241
2014
WILLIAMS AIR FORCE BASE
01
ROD Amendment
09
AZ
AZ7570028582
Bioremediation
2013
10TH STREET SITE
02
ROD Amendment
07
NE
NED981713837
2014
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND (EDGEWOOD AREA)
29
ROD
03
MD
MD2210020036
2013
AIR FORCE PLANT PJKS
01
ROD
08
CO
C07570090038
2013
ALAMEDA NAVAL AIR STATION
02
ROD
09
CA
CA2170023236
2014
ALAMEDA NAVAL AIR STATION
08
ROD
09
CA
CA2170023236
2012
ALLEGANY BALLISTICS LABORATORY (USNAVY)
11
ROD
03
WV
WV0170023691
2013
BANDERA ROAD GROUND WATER PLUME
01
ROD
06
TX
TXN000606565
2014
CAMP PENDLETON MARINE CORPS BASE
5
ROD
09
CA
CA2170023533
2013
CAYUGA GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION SITE
01
ROD
02
NY
NYN000204289
2012
CLEBURN STREET WELL
02
ROD Amendment
07
NE
NED981499312
2012
DEFENSE GENERAL SUPPLY CENTER (DLA)
07
ROD
03
VA
VA3971520751
2013
DEFENSE GENERAL SUPPLY CENTER (DLA)
06
ROD
03
VA
VA3971520751
July 2017
G-2
-------
Appendix G Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Groundwater Remedies Selected in Decision Documents From FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
FY
Site Name
OU
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2012
EL TORO MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
08
ROD
09
CA
CA6170023208
2012
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE
17
ROD
03
MD
MD9210020567
2014
GMH ELECTRONICS
01
ROD
04
NC
NCN000410161
2013
HAMILTON/LABREE ROADS GW CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
10
WA
WASFN1002174
2013
JJSEIFERT MACHINE
01
ROD
04
FL
FLN000410232
2014
MARINE CORPS COMBAT DEVELOPMENT COMMAND
21
ROD
03
VA
VA1170024722
2014
MATTIACE PETROCHEMICAL CO., INC.
01
ROD Amendment
02
NY
NYD000512459
2012
MEDLEY FARM DRUM DUMP
01
ROD Amendment
04
SC
SCD980558142
2014
MOFFETT NAVAL AIR STATION
05
ROD Amendment
09
CA
CA2170090078
2012
NAVAL WEAPONS STATION - YORKTOWN
15
ROD
03
VA
VA8170024170
2012
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
07
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
OLEAN WELL FIELD
03
ROD
02
NY
NYD980528657
2013
ORDNANCE PRODUCTS, INC.
01
ROD Amendment
03
MD
MDD982364341
2013
ORLANDO GASIFICATION PLANT
01
ROD
04
FL
FLD984169235
2012
PADUCAH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT (USDOE)
19
ROD
04
KY
KY8890008982
2013
PEACH ORCHARD RD PCE GROUNDWATER PLUME SITE
01
ROD Amendment
04
GA
GAN000407449
2013
PEASE AIR FORCE BASE
07
ESD
01
NH
NH7570024847
2014
PEASE AIR FORCE BASE
07
ESD
01
NH
NH7570024847
2014
PHOENIX-GOODYEAR AIRPORT AREA
01
ROD Amendment
09
AZ
AZD980695902
2013
SANFORD DRY CLEANERS
01
ROD
04
FL
FLD032728032
2013
SAVANNAH RIVER SITE (USDOE)
21
ESD
04
SC
SC1890008989
2013
SAVANNAH RIVER SITE (USDOE)
29
ESD
04
SC
SC1890008989
2012
SCIENTIFIC CHEMICAL PROCESSING
03
ROD
02
NJ
NJD070565403
2014
SHARPE ARMY DEPOT
01
ESD
09
CA
CA8210020832
2013
SOUTH WEYMOUTH NAVAL AIR STATION
14
ROD
01
MA
MA2170022022
2014
SOUTH WEYMOUTH NAVAL AIR STATION
09
ROD
01
MA
MA2170022022
2012
ST. J U LI ENS CREEK ANNEX (U.S. NAVY)
12
ROD
03
VA
VA5170000181
2014
TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE
06
ROD
09
CA
CA5570024575
2014
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
05
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
July 2017
G-3
-------
Appendix G Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Groundwater Remedies Selected in Decision Documents From FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
FY
Site Name
OU
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2014
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
10
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2014
VAN DER HORST USA CORPORATION
01
ROD
06
TX
TXD007357932
2012
WHITE CHEMICAL CORP.
03
ROD
02
NJ
NJD980755623
2013
WILLIAMS AIR FORCE BASE
02
ROD Amendment
09
AZ
AZ7570028582
2012
WILLOW GROVE NAVAL AIR AND AIR RESERVE STATION
02
ROD
03
PA
PAD987277837
Chemical Treatment
2013
10TH STREET SITE
02
ROD Amendment
07
NE
NED981713837
2014
ALAMEDA NAVAL AIR STATION
08
ROD
09
CA
CA2170023236
2014
CAMP PENDLETON MARINE CORPS BASE
05
ROD
09
CA
CA2170023533
2012
CLEBURN STREET WELL
02
ROD Amendment
07
NE
NED981499312
2012
CROWN CLEANERS OF WATERTOWN INC.
01
ROD
02
NY
NYD986965333
2014
DAVISVILLE NAVAL CONSTRUCTION BATTALION CENTER
09
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170022036
2012
ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE
11
ROD Amendment
08
SD
SD2571924644
2014
ELMORE WASTE DISPOSAL
01
ESD
04
SC
SCD980839542
2012
EVOR PHILLIPS LEASING
03
ROD
02
NJ
NJD980654222
2013
F.E. WARREN AIR FORCE BASE
14
ROD
08
WY
WY5571924179
2014
GMH ELECTRONICS
01
ROD
04
NC
NCN000410161
2014
HANFORD 300-AREA (USDOE)
04
ROD
10
WA
WA2890090077
2013
INDIAN HEAD NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER
07
ROD
03
MD
MD7170024684
2012
INTERSTATE LEAD CO. (ILCO)
02
ROD Amendment
04
AL
ALD041906173
2013
JACKSON PARK HOUSING COMPLEX (USNAVY)
01
ROD Amendment
10
WA
WA3170090044
2012
KOPPERS CO., INC. (MORRISVILLE PLANT)
01
ESD
04
NC
NCD003200383
2012
MAYWOOD CHEMICAL CO.
03
ROD
02
NJ
NJD980529762
2013
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION)
01
ESD
09
CA
CA4570024337
2013
NEBRASKA ORDNANCE PLANT (FORMER)
05
ROD
07
NE
NE6211890011
2013
NEW CASSEL/HICKSVILLE GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
02
NY
NY0001095363
2012
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
07
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
OLEAN WELL FIELD
02
ROD Amendment
02
NY
NYD980528657
2014
PHOENIX-GOODYEAR AIRPORT AREA
01
ROD Amendment
09
AZ
AZD980695902
July 2017
G-4
-------
Appendix G Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Groundwater Remedies Selected in Decision Documents From FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
FY
Site Name
ou
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2014
REEVES SOUTHEASTERN GALVANIZING CORP.
02
ROD Amendment
04
FL
FLD000824896
2013
RIVERBANK ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT
01
ESD
09
CA
CA7210020759
2014
SANGAMO ELECTRIC DUMP/CRAB ORCHARD NATIONAL WILDLIFE
REFUGE (USDOI)
02
ROD Amendment
05
IL
IL8143609487
2012
SCIENTIFIC CHEMICAL PROCESSING
03
ROD
02
NJ
NJD070565403
2014
SHARPE ARMY DEPOT
01
ESD
09
CA
CA8210020832
2012
SOUTH WEYMOUTH NAVAL AIR STATION
11
ROD
01
MA
MA2170022022
2012
ST. J U LI ENS CREEK ANNEX (U.S. NAVY)
12
ROD
03
VA
VA5170000181
2013
TELEDYNE WAH CHANG
01
ESD
10
OR
ORD050955848
2014
TINKER AIR FORCE BASE (SOLDIER CREEK/BUILDING 3001)
01
ROD
06
OK
OK1571724391
2012
TUCSON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AREA
01
ROD Amendment
09
AZ
AZD980737530
2012
US NASA MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER
03
ROD
04
AL
AL1800013863
2012
VELSICOL CHEMICAL CORP. (MICHIGAN)
01
ROD
05
Ml
MID000722439
2012
WHITE CHEMICAL CORP.
03
ROD
02
NJ
NJD980755623
2014
WILLIAMS AIR FORCE BASE
01
ROD Amendment
09
AZ
AZ7570028582
Flushing
2013 JACKSON PARK HOUSING COMPLEX (USNAVY)
01
ROD Amendment
10
WA
WA3170090044
Fracturing
2012
US NASA MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER
03
ROD
04
AL
AL1800013863
2013
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION)
01
ESD
09
CA
CA4570024337
2014
SHARPE ARMY DEPOT
01
ESD
09
CA
CA8210020832
In well Air Stripping
2013
NEW CASSEL/HICKSVILLE GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
02
NY
NY0001095363
2014
WILLIAMS AIR FORCE BASE
01
ROD Amendment
09
AZ
AZ7570028582
Multi phase Extraction
2013
JACKSON PARK HOUSING COMPLEX (USNAVY)
01
ROD Amendment
10
WA
WA3170090044
2013
WILLIAMS AIR FORCE BASE
02
ROD Amendment
09
AZ
AZ7570028582
July 2017
G-5
-------
Appendix G Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Groundwater Remedies Selected in Decision Documents From FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
FY
Site Name
ou
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
Permeable Reactive Barrier
2013
68TH STREET DUMP/INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES
01
ROD
03
MD
MDD980918387
2013
CAMP LEJEUNE MILITARY RES. (USNAVY)
17
ROD
04
NC
NC6170022580
2014
CIDRA GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
02
PR
PRN000204538
2014
GMH ELECTRONICS
01
ROD
04
NC
NCN000410161
2013
PEERLESS PLATING CO.
01
ROD Amendment
05
Ml
MID006031348
2013
SOUTH WEYMOUTH NAVAL AIR STATION
14
ROD
01
MA
MA2170022022
2014
TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE
06
ROD
09
CA
CA5570024575
Phytoremediation
2014
NATIONAL FIREWORKS
02
ROD
04
TN
TNSFN0407047
2014
TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE
06
ROD
09
CA
CA5570024575
Thermal Treatment
2012
CLEBURN STREET WELL
02
ROD Amendment
07
NE
NED981499312
2013
JACKSON PARK HOUSING COMPLEX (USNAVY)
01
ROD Amendment
10
WA
WA3170090044
2014
MATTIACE PETROCHEMICAL CO., INC.
01
ROD Amendment
02
NY
NYD000512459
2013
WILLIAMS AIR FORCE BASE
02
ROD Amendment
09
AZ
AZ7570028582
Unspecified In Situ Treatment
2014
BRESLUBE-PENN, INC.
01
ESD
03
PA
PAD089667695
2014
CIDRA GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
02
PR
PRN000204538
2013
ORLANDO GASIFICATION PLANT
01
ROD
04
FL
FLD984169235
MONITORED NATURAL ATTENUATION
2013
ALAMEDA NAVAL AIR STATION
02
ROD
09
CA
CA2170023236
2012
ALLEGANY BALLISTICS LABORATORY (USNAVY)
11
ROD
03
WV
WV0170023691
2013
CAMP LEJEUNE MILITARY RES. (USNAVY)
15
ROD
04
NC
NC6170022580
2013
CAMP LEJEUNE MILITARY RES. (USNAVY)
17
ROD
04
NC
NC6170022580
2014
CAMP LEJEUNE MILITARY RES. (USNAVY)
24
ROD
04
NC
NC6170022580
2013
CHEMFAX, INC.
01
ROD Amendment
04
MS
MSD008154486
2014
CIDRA GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
02
PR
PRN000204538
2012
CROWN CLEANERS OF WATERTOWN INC.
01
ROD
02
NY
NYD986965333
July 2017
G-6
-------
Appendix G Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Groundwater Remedies Selected in Decision Documents From FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
FY
Site Name
ou
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2014
DAVISVILLE NAVAL CONSTRUCTION BATTALION CENTER
09
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170022036
2012
DEFENSE GENERAL SUPPLY CENTER (DLA)
07
ROD
03
VA
VA3971520751
2013
DEFENSE GENERAL SUPPLY CENTER (DLA)
06
ROD
03
VA
VA3971520751
2012
EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE
13
ROD
09
CA
CA1570024504
2012
EL TORO MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
08
ROD
09
CA
CA6170023208
2014
FORT WAINWRIGHT
07
ROD
10
AK
AK6210022426
2014
HANFORD 100-AREA (USDOE)
35
ROD
10
WA
WA3890090076
2012
HANFORD 200-AREA (USDOE)
49
ROD
10
WA
WA1890090078
2014
HANFORD 300-AREA (USDOE)
04
ROD
10
WA
WA2890090077
2013
INDIAN HEAD NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER
07
ROD
03
MD
MD7170024684
2013
JJSEIFERT MACHINE
01
ROD
04
FL
FLN000410232
2012
KEARSARGE METALLURGICAL CORP.
01
ROD Amendment
01
NH
NHD062002001
2014
LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT (PDO AREA)
02
ROD
03
PA
PA2210090054
2014
MARINE CORPS COMBAT DEVELOPMENT COMMAND
21
ROD
03
VA
VA1170024722
2012
MAUNABO URBANO PUBLIC WELLS
01
ROD
02
PR
PRN000205831
2012
MAYWOOD CHEMICAL CO.
03
ROD
02
NJ
NJD980529762
2012
MEDLEY FARM DRUM DUMP
01
ROD Amendment
04
SC
SCD980558142
2014
MILAN ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT
06
ROD
04
TN
TN0210020582
2014
MOFFETT NAVAL AIR STATION
05
ROD Amendment
09
CA
CA2170090078
2012
NAVAL WEAPONS STATION - YORKTOWN
15
ROD
03
VA
VA8170024170
2012
NEW BRIGHTON/ARDEN HILLS/TCAAP (USARMY)
07
ROD Amendment
05
MN
MN7213820908
2012
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
07
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2013
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
11
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
02
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
06
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
12
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2012
ONALASKA MUNICIPAL LANDFILL
01
ROD Amendment
05
Wl
WID980821656
2013
ORLANDO GASIFICATION PLANT
01
ROD
04
FL
FLD984169235
2013
PEOPLES NATURAL GAS CO.
01
ROD Amendment
07
IA
IAD980852578
July 2017
G-7
-------
Appendix G Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Groundwater Remedies Selected in Decision Documents From FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
FY
Site Name
OU
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2013
PETERSON/PURITAN, INC.
01
ESD
01
Rl
RID055176283
2012
PICATINNY ARSENAL (USARMY)
15
ROD
02
NJ
NJ3210020704
2012
PURITY OIL SALES, INC.
01
ROD Amendment
09
CA
CAD980736151
2013
SANFORD DRY CLEANERS
01
ROD
04
FL
FLD032728032
2012
SCIENTIFIC CHEMICAL PROCESSING
03
ROD
02
NJ
NJD070565403
2012
SHENANDOAH ROAD GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
02
NY
NYSFN0204269
2014
SOUTH CAVALCADE STREET
01
ROD Amendment
06
TX
TXD980810386
2014
SOUTH WEYMOUTH NAVAL AIR STATION
09
ROD
01
MA
MA2170022022
2014
TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE
06
ROD
09
CA
CA5570024575
2014
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
05
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2014
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
10
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2012
TUCSON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AREA
01
ROD Amendment
09
AZ
AZD980737530
2013
WHITE SWAN LAUNDRY AND CLEANER INC.
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJSFN0204241
2013
WILLIAMS AIR FORCE BASE
02
ROD Amendment
09
AZ
AZ7570028582
2012
WILLOW GROVE NAVAL AIR AND AIR RESERVE STATION
02
ROD
03
PA
PAD987277837
2012
WPSC STEVENS POINT
01
ROD
05
Wl
WIN000509983
CONTAINMENT (VERTICAL ENGINEERED BARRIER)
2014
LCP CHEMICALS INC.
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJD079303020
2014
MATTIACE PETROCHEMICAL CO., INC.
01
ROD Amendment
02
NY
NYD000512459
2013
ORLANDO GASIFICATION PLANT
01
ROD
04
FL
FLD984169235
2013
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
07
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2014
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
05
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
CONSTRUCTED TREATMENT WETLAND
2013
68TH STREET DUMP/INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES
01
ROD
03
MD
MDD980918387
2014
BREWER GOLD MINE
01
ROD
04
SC
SCD987577913
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS
2013
68TH STREET DUMP/INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES
01
ROD
03
MD
MDD980918387
2014
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND (EDGEWOOD AREA)
29
ROD
03
MD
MD2210020036
2013
AIR FORCE PLANT PJKS
01
ROD
08
CO
C07570090038
July 2017
G-8
-------
Appendix G Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Groundwater Remedies Selected in Decision Documents From FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
FY
Site Name
ou
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2013
ALAMEDA NAVAL AIR STATION
02
ROD
09
CA
CA2170023236
2014
ALAMEDA NAVAL AIR STATION
08
ROD
09
CA
CA2170023236
2012
ALLEGANY BALLISTICS LABORATORY (USNAVY)
11
ROD
03
WV
WV0170023691
2012
AMERICAN CYANAMID CO
04
ROD
02
NJ
NJD002173276
2012
AVCO LYCOMING (WILLIAMSPORT DIVISION)
02
ESD
03
PA
PAD003053709
2013
BANDERA ROAD GROUND WATER PLUME
01
ROD
06
TX
TXN000606565
2013
BROOK INDUSTRIAL PARK
01
ESD
02
NJ
NJD078251675
2012
BUNKER HILL MINING & METALLURGICAL COMPLEX
03
ROD Amendment
10
ID
IDD048340921
2013
CALIFORNIA GULCH
01
ESD
08
CO
COD980717938
2013
CAMP LEJEUNE MILITARY RES. (USNAVY)
12
ROD
04
NC
NC6170022580
2013
CAMP LEJEUNE MILITARY RES. (USNAVY)
15
ROD
04
NC
NC6170022580
2013
CAMP LEJEUNE MILITARY RES. (USNAVY)
17
ROD
04
NC
NC6170022580
2014
CAMP LEJEUNE MILITARY RES. (USNAVY)
24
ROD
04
NC
NC6170022580
2014
CAMP PENDLETON MARINE CORPS BASE
05
ROD
09
CA
CA2170023533
2013
CAYUGA GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION SITE
01
ROD
02
NY
NYN000204289
2012
CENTREDALE MANOR RESTORATION PROJECT
01
ROD
01
Rl
RID981203755
2014
CIDRA GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
02
PR
PRN000204538
2012
CORNELL DUBILIER ELECTRONICS INC.
03
ROD
02
NJ
NJD981557879
2012
CROWN CLEANERS OF WATERTOWN INC.
01
ROD
02
NY
NYD986965333
2014
DAVISVILLE NAVAL CONSTRUCTION BATTALION CENTER
09
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170022036
2012
DEFENSE GENERAL SUPPLY CENTER (DLA)
07
ROD
03
VA
VA3971520751
2013
DEFENSE GENERAL SUPPLY CENTER (DLA)
06
ROD
03
VA
VA3971520751
2012
DIAZ CHEMICAL
02
ROD
02
NY
NYD067532580
2012
DOUGLASS ROAD/UNI ROYAL, INC., LANDFILL
02
ESD
05
IN
IND980607881
2014
EAGLE PICHER CAREFREE BATTERY
01
ROD
06
NM
NMD001829506
2012
EAGLE ZINC CO DIV T L DIAMOND
02
ROD
05
IL
ILD980606941
2012
EASTERN MICHAUD FLATS CONTAMINATION
01
ROD Amendment
10
ID
IDD984666610
2012
EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE
13
ROD
09
CA
CA1570024504
2012
EL TORO MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
08
ROD
09
CA
CA6170023208
July 2017
G-9
-------
Appendix G Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Groundwater Remedies Selected in Decision Documents From FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
FY
Site Name
ou
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2013
ELLIS PROPERTY
01
ROD Amendment
02
NJ
NJD980529085
2012
EVOR PHILLIPS LEASING
03
ROD
02
NJ
NJD980654222
2013
F.E. WARREN AIR FORCE BASE
14
ROD
08
WY
WY5571924179
2013
FLORIDA STEEL CORP.
02
ESD
04
FL
FLD050432251
2012
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE
17
ROD
03
MD
MD9210020567
2014
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE
13
ROD
03
MD
MD9210020567
2014
FORT WAINWRIGHT
07
ROD
10
AK
AK6210022426
2014
FRENCH, LTD.
01
ROD Amendment
06
TX
TXD980514814
2013
GARVEY ELEVATOR
02
ROD
07
NE
NEN000704351
2014
GMH ELECTRONICS
01
ROD
04
NC
NCN000410161
2012
GRIFFISS AIR FORCE BASE (11 AREAS)
04
ROD
02
NY
NY4571924451
2013
HAMILTON/LABREE ROADS GW CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
10
WA
WASFN1002174
2014
HANFORD 100-AREA (USDOE)
35
ROD
10
WA
WA3890090076
2012
HANFORD 200-AREA (USDOE)
49
ROD
10
WA
WA1890090078
2014
HANFORD 300-AREA (USDOE)
04
ROD
10
WA
WA2890090077
2012
HOOKER (HYDE PARK)
01
ESD
02
NY
NYD000831644
2013
INDIAN HEAD NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER
07
ROD
03
MD
MD7170024684
2014
INDIAN HEAD NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER
21
ROD
03
MD
MD7170024684
2014
INDIAN HEAD NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER
24
ROD
03
MD
MD7170024684
2012
INTERSTATE LEAD CO. (ILCO)
02
ROD Amendment
04
AL
ALD041906173
2013
JJSEIFERT MACHINE
01
ROD
04
FL
FLN000410232
2012
KEARSARGE METALLURGICAL CORP.
01
ROD Amendment
01
NH
NHD062002001
2012
KOPPERS CO., INC. (MORRISVILLE PLANT)
01
ESD
04
NC
NCD003200383
2014
LCP CHEMICALS INC.
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJD079303020
2014
LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT (PDO AREA)
02
ROD
03
PA
PA2210090054
2014
LUSHER STREET GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
05
IN
IND982073785
2012
MADISON COUNTY MINES
05
ROD
07
MO
MOD098633415
2014
MARINE CORPS COMBAT DEVELOPMENT COMMAND
21
ROD
03
VA
VA1170024722
2014
MATTIACE PETROCHEMICAL CO., INC.
01
ROD Amendment
02
NY
NYD000512459
July 2017
G-10
-------
Appendix G Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Groundwater Remedies Selected in Decision Documents From FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
FY
Site Name
ou
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2012
MAUNABO URBANO PUBLIC WELLS
01
ROD
02
PR
PRN000205831
2012
MAYWOOD CHEMICAL CO.
03
ROD
02
NJ
NJD980529762
2014
MILAN ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT
06
ROD
04
TN
TN0210020582
2014
MOFFETT NAVAL AIR STATION
05
ROD Amendment
09
CA
CA2170090078
2013
MOUNTAIN HOME AIR FORCE BASE
03
ROD Amendment
10
ID
ID3572124557
2014
NATIONAL FIREWORKS
02
ROD
04
TN
TNSFN0407047
2014
NAVAL WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL RESERVE PLANT
01
ESD
01
MA
MA6170023570
2012
NAVAL WEAPONS STATION - YORKTOWN
15
ROD
03
VA
VA8170024170
2013
NEBRASKA ORDNANCE PLANT (FORMER)
05
ROD
07
NE
NE6211890011
2012
NEW BRIGHTON/ARDEN HILLS/TCAAP (USARMY)
07
ROD Amendment
05
MN
MN7213820908
2013
NEW CASSEL/HICKSVILLE GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
02
NY
NY0001095363
2013
NEW LYME LANDFILL
01
ESD
05
OH
OHD980794614
2012
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
07
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2013
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
11
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
02
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
06
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
12
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2013
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. (SARATOGA SPRINGS PLANT)
02
ROD
02
NY
NYD980664361
2014
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY (LOT 86, FARM UNIT #1)
01
ESD
04
NC
NCD980557656
2012
NORTH PENN - AREA 1
01
ESD
03
PA
PAD096834494
2013
NORTH SANITARY LANDFILL
01
ROD
05
OH
OHD980611875
2012
OLD AMERICAN ZINC PLANT
02
ROD
05
IL
IL0000034355
2014
OLEAN WELL FIELD
02
ROD Amendment
02
NY
NYD980528657
2014
OLEAN WELL FIELD
03
ROD
02
NY
NYD980528657
2012
ONALASKA MUNICIPAL LANDFILL
01
ROD Amendment
05
Wl
WID980821656
2013
ORLANDO GASIFICATION PLANT
01
ROD
04
FL
FLD984169235
2013
OUTBOARD MARINE CORP.
04
ROD Amendment
05
IL
ILD000802827
2012
PADUCAH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT (USDOE)
19
ROD
04
KY
KY8890008982
July 2017
G-ll
-------
Appendix G Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Groundwater Remedies Selected in Decision Documents From FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
FY
Site Name
OU
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2013
PEOPLES NATURAL GAS CO.
01
ROD Amendment
07
IA
IAD980852578
2012
PICATINNY ARSENAL (USARMY)
15
ROD
02
NJ
NJ3210020704
2014
PLATTSBURGH AIR FORCE BASE
06
ROD
02
NY
NY4571924774
2012
PURITY OIL SALES, INC.
01
ROD Amendment
09
CA
CAD980736151
2014
REEVES SOUTHEASTERN GALVANIZING CORP.
02
ROD Amendment
04
FL
FLD000824896
2013
ROSE TOWNSHIP DUMP
01
ESD
05
Ml
MID980499842
2013
SANFORD DRY CLEANERS
01
ROD
04
FL
FLD032728032
SANGAMO ELECTRIC DUMP/CRAB ORCHARD NATIONAL WILDLIFE
2014
REFUGE (USDOI)
02
ROD Amendment
05
IL
IL8143609487
2012
SAVANNA ARMY DEPOT ACTIVITY
08
ROD
05
IL
IL3210020803
2012
SCIENTIFIC CHEMICAL PROCESSING
03
ROD
02
NJ
NJD070565403
2014
SHARPE ARMY DEPOT
01
ESD
09
CA
CA8210020832
2012
SHENANDOAH ROAD GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
02
NY
NYSFN0204269
2014
SOUTH CAVALCADE STREET
01
ROD Amendment
06
TX
TXD980810386
2012
SOUTH WEYMOUTH NAVAL AIR STATION
11
ROD
01
MA
MA2170022022
2012
SOUTH WEYMOUTH NAVAL AIR STATION
25
ESD
01
MA
MA2170022022
2013
SOUTH WEYMOUTH NAVAL AIR STATION
04
ESD
01
MA
MA2170022022
2013
SOUTH WEYMOUTH NAVAL AIR STATION
14
ROD
01
MA
MA2170022022
2014
SOUTH WEYMOUTH NAVAL AIR STATION
09
ROD
01
MA
MA2170022022
2012
SPECTRON, INC.
02
ROD
03
MD
MDD000218008
2012
ST. J U LI ENS CREEK ANNEX (U.S. NAVY)
12
ROD
03
VA
VA5170000181
2012
STRASBURG LANDFILL
00
ESD
03
PA
PAD000441337
2014
TINKER AIR FORCE BASE (SOLDIER CREEK/BUILDING 3001)
01
ROD
06
OK
OK1571724391
2014
TOMAH ARMORY
01
ESD
05
Wl
WID980610299
2014
TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE
06
ROD
09
CA
CA5570024575
2013
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
07
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2014
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
05
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2014
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
10
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2012
TUCSON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AREA
01
ROD Amendment
09
AZ
AZD980737530
July 2017
G-12
-------
Appendix G Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Groundwater Remedies Selected in Decision Documents From FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
FY
Site Name
ou
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2014
VAN DER HORST USA CORPORATION
01
ROD
06
TX
TXD007357932
2012
VELSICOL CHEMICAL CORP. (MICHIGAN)
01
ROD
05
Ml
MID000722439
2014
VERONA WELL FIELD
02
ESD
05
Ml
MID980793806
2012
WHITE CHEMICAL CORP.
03
ROD
02
NJ
NJD980755623
2013
WHITE SWAN LAUNDRY AND CLEANER INC.
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJSFN0204241
2014
WILLIAMS AIR FORCE BASE
01
ROD Amendment
09
AZ
AZ7570028582
2012
WILLOW GROVE NAVAL AIR AND AIR RESERVE STATION
02
ROD
03
PA
PAD987277837
2012
WPSC STEVENS POINT
01
ROD
05
Wl
WIN000509983
2012
WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE
01
ESD
05
OH
OH7571724312
ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY
2012
ABERDEEN CONTAMINATED GROUND WATER
01
ROD
04
NC
NCN000407447
2014
ABERDEEN CONTAMINATED GROUND WATER
01
ROD Amendment
04
NC
NCN000407447
2014
CAMP PENDLETON MARINE CORPS BASE
05
ROD
09
CA
CA2170023533
2013
CAYUGA GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION SITE
01
ROD
02
NY
NYN000204289
2013
JJSEIFERT MACHINE
01
ROD
04
FL
FLN000410232
2014
LUSHER STREET GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
05
IN
IND982073785
2014
MADISON COUNTY MINES
03
ROD
07
MO
MOD098633415
2013
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. (SARATOGA SPRINGS PLANT)
02
ROD
02
NY
NYD980664361
2012
ONALASKA MUNICIPAL LANDFILL
01
ROD Amendment
05
Wl
WID980821656
2012
VELSICOL CHEMICAL CORP. (MICHIGAN)
01
ROD
05
Ml
MID000722439
OTHER REMEDIES
Fencing and Signs
2013
68TH STREET DUMP/INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES
01
ROD
03
MD
MDD980918387
2012
AMERICAN CYANAMID CO
04
ROD
02
NJ
NJD002173276
2013
BANDERA ROAD GROUND WATER PLUME
01
ROD
06
TX
TXN000606565
2014
MATTIACE PETROCHEMICAL CO., INC.
01
ROD Amendment
02
NY
NYD000512459
2014
REEVES SOUTHEASTERN GALVANIZING CORP.
02
ROD Amendment
04
FL
FLD000824896
2012
VELSICOL CHEMICAL CORP. (MICHIGAN)
01
ROD
05
Ml
MID000722439
July 2017
G-13
-------
Appendix G Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Groundwater Remedies Selected in Decision Documents From FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
FY Site Name
OU
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
Leachate Control
2012 BUNKER HILL MINING & METALLURGICAL COMPLEX
03
ROD Amendment
10
ID
IDD048340921
Wetlands Restoration
2013 TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
07
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
July 2017
G-14
-------
Appendix H
Vapor Intrusion Remedies Selected in Decision
Documents from FY 2012-2014
-------
Appendix H Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
Vapor Intrusion Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
FY
Site Name
OU
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
Active Depressurization Technology
2012
CROSSLEY FARM
03
ROD
03
PA
PAD981740061
2014
LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT (SE AREA)
28
ROD
03
PA
PA6213820503
2014
LUSHER STREET GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
05
IN
IND982073785
2014
PLATTSBURGH AIR FORCE BASE
06
ROD
02
NY
NY4571924774
passive Barrier (Impermeable Membrane)
2013
BANDERA ROAD GROUND WATER PLUME
01
ROD
06
TX
TXN000606565
2012
CROSSLEY FARM
03
ROD
03
PA
PAD981740061
fub Slab Ventilation
2013
BANDERA ROAD GROUND WATER PLUME
01
ROD
06
TX
TXN000606565
2012
CROSSLEY FARM
03
ROD
03
PA
PAD981740061
yapor Intrusion Mitigation (Unspecified)
2014
LUSHER STREET GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
05
IN
IND982073785
2013
SCOVILL INDUSTRIAL LANDFILL
01
ROD
01
CT
CT0002265551
2012
SHENANDOAH ROAD GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
02
NY
NYSFN0204269
2013
WHITE SWAN LAUNDRY AND CLEANER INC.
01
ROD
02
NJ
NJSFN0204241
2012
WILLOW GROVE NAVAL AIR AND AIR RESERVE STATION
02
ROD
03
PA
PAD987277837
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS
Institutional Controls for Existing Structures
2014
CAMP LEJEUNE MILITARY RES. (USNAVY)
24
ROD
04
NC
NC6170022580
2014
CIDRA GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
02
PR
PRN000204538
2012
GRIFFISS AIR FORCE BASE (11 AREAS)
07
ROD
02
NY
NY4571924451
2014
LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT (SE AREA)
28
ROD
03
PA
PA6213820503
2014
OLEAN WELL FIELD
02
ROD Amendment
02
NY
NYD980528657
2013
PEOPLES NATURAL GAS CO.
01
ROD Amendment
07
IA
IAD980852578
2014
PLATTSBURGH AIR FORCE BASE
06
ROD
02
NY
NY4571924774
2013
SCOVILL INDUSTRIAL LANDFILL
01
ROD
01
CT
CT0002265551
2012
SHENANDOAH ROAD GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
02
NY
NYSFN0204269
July 2017
H-l
-------
Appendix H
Vapor Intrusion Remedies Selected in Decision Documents from FY 2012-14, Organized by Technology
Superfund Remedy Report, 15th Edition
FY
Site Name
OU
Document Type
Region
State
EPA ID
2014
TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE
06
ROD
09
CA
CA5570024575
2012
WILLOW GROVE NAVAL AIR AND AIR RESERVE STATION
02
ROD
03
PA
PAD987277837
Institutional Controls for Future Construction
2014
ALAMEDA NAVAL AIR STATION
08
ROD
09
CA
CA2170023236
2013
CAMP LEJEUNE MILITARY RES. (USNAVY)
17
ROD
04
NC
NC6170022580
2012
CROSSLEY FARM
03
ROD
03
PA
PAD981740061
2012
DEFENSE GENERAL SUPPLY CENTER (DLA)
07
ROD
03
VA
VA3971520751
2013
DEFENSE GENERAL SUPPLY CENTER (DLA)
06
ROD
03
VA
VA3971520751
2014
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE
13
ROD
03
MD
MD9210020567
2013
GREENWOOD CHEMICAL CO.
04
ESD
03
VA
VAD003125374
2014
LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT (PDO AREA)
02
ROD
03
PA
PA2210090054
2014
LITTLE VALLEY
02
ESD
02
NY
NY0001233634
2014
LUSHER STREET GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION
01
ROD
05
IN
IND982073785
2014
MATTIACE PETROCHEMICAL CO., INC.
01
ROD Amendment
02
NY
NYD000512459
2012
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION)
17
ROD
09
CA
CA4570024337
2014
MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE (GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION)
06
ROD
09
CA
CA4570024337
2014
MOFFETT NAVAL AIR STATION
05
ROD Amendment
09
CA
CA2170090078
2014
NAVAL WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL RESERVE PLANT
01
ESD
01
MA
MA6170023570
2014
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER
12
ROD
01
Rl
RI6170085470
2014
OLEAN WELL FIELD
03
ROD
02
NY
NYD980528657
2013
SCOVILL INDUSTRIAL LANDFILL
01
ROD
01
CT
CT0002265551
2014
SHARPE ARMY DEPOT
01
ESD
09
CA
CA8210020832
2013
SOUTH WEYMOUTH NAVAL AIR STATION
14
ROD
01
MA
MA2170022022
2014
SOUTH WEYMOUTH NAVAL AIR STATION
09
ROD
01
MA
MA2170022022
2014
TINKER AIR FORCE BASE (SOLDIER CREEK/BUILDING 3001)
01
ROD
06
OK
OK1571724391
2014
TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS POINT ANNEX
05
ROD
09
CA
CA1170090087
2014
WILLIAMS AIR FORCE BASE
01
ROD Amendment
09
AZ
AZ7570028582
2012
WILLOW GROVE NAVAL AIR AND AIR RESERVE STATION
02
ROD
03
PA
PAD987277837
July 2017
H-2
-------
|