9 \
KSBZ!
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
Operating efficiently and effectively
Follow-Up Audit:
EPA Needs to Strengthen
Internal Controls Over
Retention Incentives
Report No. 17-P-0407 September 26, 2017
INTERNAL CONTROLS
RETENTION INCENTIVES
-------
Report Contributors:
Angela Bennett
Jan Lister
Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
OARM Office of Administration and Resources Management
OCFO Office of the Chief Financial Officer
OIG Office of Inspector General
OPM U.S. Office of Personnel Management
PC A Physician's Comparability Allowance
U.S.C. United States Code
Cover image: Image regarding retention incentives, prepared by EPA OIG.
Are you aware of fraud, waste or abuse in an
EPA program?
EPA Inspector General Hotline
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (2431T)
Washington, DC 20460
(888) 546-8740
(202) 566-2599 (fax)
OIG Hotiine@epa.aov
Learn more about our OiG Hotline.
EPA Office of Inspector General
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (2410T)
Washington, DC 20460
(202) 566-2391
www.epa.aov/oia
Subscribe to our Email Updates
Follow us on Twitter @EPAoia
Send us your Project Suggestions
-------
/ _ • ,
1®/
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Inspector General
At a Glance
17-P-0407
September 26, 2017
Why We Did This Audit
The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) Office
of Inspector General (OIG)
conducted this audit to follow
up on corrective actions made
in response to two prior OIG
audits on retention incentives
paid by the agency and OIG.
Retention incentives are used
to retain employees who are
highly or uniquely qualified, or
meet a special need.
The objectives of this follow-up
audit were to determine
whether: (1) the agency
completed the corrective
actions proposed in the prior
audits, (2) actions taken were
effective in resolving the cause
of the findings, and (3) the
agency and OIG complied with
regulations and policies for
retention incentives since the
prior audits.
This report addresses the
following:
• Operating efficiently and
effectively.
Send all inquiries to our public
affairs office at (202) 566-2391
or visit www.epa.gov/oia.
Listing of OIG reports.
Follow-Up Audit: EPA Needs to Strengthen
Internal Controls Over Retention Incentives
What We Found
The agency completed its proposed corrective
actions to address prior OIG audit
recommendations. However, the agency has
not monitored retention incentives as required
by existing EPA policy and 5 CFR §
575.312(a), nor issued a new incentive policy.
In response to the prior OIG audit, the agency
stated it had drafted a new policy that
delineates the EPA's implementation
requirements and processes. These actions
are needed to further strengthen internal controls and effectively resolve the
cause of the prior audit findings.
The agency did not perform monitoring reviews due to a misunderstanding
of oversight responsibilities. The EPA's new policy, drafted in 2014, has not
been issued and is currently under review by agency officials. We also
identified two requirements that should be included in the agency's new
policy—quarterly reviews and performance ratings. Without an up-to-date
policy, the agency has no assurance that retention incentives are authorized
and activities are monitored consistent with its policy and federal
requirements, or that payments are valid.
The agency complied with its existing policy and 5 CFR Part 575,
Subpart C, for one of two employees receiving retention incentive payments
since the prior audits. However, the agency indicated the payments for the
second employee may have been the result of payroll miscoding, and we
questioned the payments of $1,605 to that employee.
The OIG has not given any retention incentives since the prior audit, and
therefore we performed no additional work related to the OIG.
Recommendations and Planned Agency Corrective Actions
We recommend that the Assistant Administrator for Administration and
Resources Management: (1) implement quarterly monitoring of retention
incentives; (2) issue new policy on retention incentives, including
requirements for quarterly monitoring and performance ratings; and
(3) determine the validity of the irregular payments to an employee totaling
$1,605 and, if invalid, discontinue payments and recover all funds paid.
The agency agreed to take sufficient corrective action for all
recommendations.
Additional actions are
needed to strengthen
internal controls over
monitoring and to
effectively resolve the
cause of the prior audit
findings. We question
$1,605 of irregular
payments.
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
September 26, 2017
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Follow-Up Audit: EPA Needs to Strengthen Internal Controls Over Retention Incentives
This is our report on the subject audit conducted by the Office of Inspector General (OIG) of the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The project number for this audit was OA-FY 17-0025.
This report contains findings that describe the problems the OIG has identified and corrective actions the
OIG recommends. This report represents the opinion of the OIG and does not necessarily represent the
final EPA position.
In response to our discussion document, the agency provided an intended corrective action plan that
addresses the recommendations and establishes planned completion dates. Therefore, a response to the
final report is not required. The audit will be closed in the OIG's tracking system; however, the agency
should track unimplemented corrective actions in EPA's Management Audit Tracking System.
We will post this report to our website at www.epa. gov/oig.
FROM:
Arthur A. Elkins Jr.
TO:
Donna J. Vizi an, Acting Assistant Administrator
Office of Administration and Resources Management
-------
Follow-Up Audit: EPA Needs to Strengthen
Internal Controls Over Retention Incentives
17-P-0407
Table of Contents
Purpose 1
Background 1
Regulatory Requirements 1
EPA Guidance and Policy Requirements 2
Prior Audits 2
Responsible Offices 3
Scope and Methodology 3
Results of Audit 4
Additional Actions Needed to Strengthen Internal Controls 5
Incentive Payments and Compliance With Policies and Regulations 6
Conclusion 7
Recommendations 7
EPA Response and OIG Comments 8
Status of Recommendations and Potential Monetary Benefits 9
Appendices
A EPA Response to Discussion Document 10
B Distribution 12
-------
Purpose
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Inspector General
(OIG) conducted this audit to follow up on corrective actions to recommendations
made in the following two prior OIG audits:
• EPA Compliance With Retention Incentive Regulations and Policies
(Report No. 14-P-0245). dated May 2, 2014.
• EPA OIG Compliance With Retention Incentive Regulations and Policies
(Report No. 14-B-0246"). dated May 2, 2014.
The objectives of this follow-up audit were to determine whether:
• The agency completed the corrective actions proposed in its July 2, 2014,
memorandum.
• Actions taken by the agency were effective in resolving the cause of the
report findings.
• The agency and the OIG have complied with regulations and policies for
retention incentives awarded since the prior audits.
Background
The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) defines a retention incentive as
an incentive that an agency may pay to retain an employee who is highly or
uniquely qualified, or who meets a special need of the agency. The retention
incentive should be used for only those employees likely to leave federal service
or take a different federal position.
Regulatory Requirements
Retention incentive regulations are codified in 5 CFR Part 575, Subpart C. These
regulations require:
• An employee's rating of record must be at least "fully successful" or
equivalent to be eligible for a retention incentive, and the incentive must
be terminated if the employee receives a rating of less than "fully
successful" or equivalent.
• Agencies must make an annual determination on whether a retention
incentive payment is still warranted with written certification by an
authorized official.
• Agencies must monitor retention incentives to ensure consistency with the
requirements of 5 U.S.C. § 5754 and 5 CFR Part 575, Subpart C.
17-P-0407
1
-------
EPA Guidance and Policy Requirements
On July 3, 2013, the EPA Chief of Staff issued a memorandum to all managers
and supervisors, "Ensuring Accurate Employee Pay and Travel Reimbursement."
The memorandum included an attachment from the Office of Administration and
Resources Management (OARM) and the Office of the Chief Financial Officer
(OCFO) that highlighted a number of significant changes taken to enhance
internal control activities overtime and attendance, including retention incentives.
The attachment included the following requirements related to retention
incentives:
• Periodic reviews by OCFO to monitor compliance with policy and
procedures.
• Review of incentives by OARM as part of an OPM-required annual audit
of each Shared Service Center.
• Development of a listing of all employees receiving incentives, to be
reviewed semiannually by the Shared Service Centers and agency Senior
Resource Officials.
• Production of a semiannual report for the Deputy Administrator that
identifies employees with salaries exceeding the executive level II pay
cap.
• Establishment of a termination date for each retention incentive granted.
On November 19, 2013, the OARM Office of Human Resources issued
HR Bulletin 14-00IB, "Retention Incentives: Interim Procedures, Documentation,
Recertification and Oversight Requirements." Issuance of the bulletin was one of
several actions taken by the agency to strengthen its internal controls. The agency
stated the bulletin delineated all requirements for approval, justification,
documentation and annual review of incentives. The bulletin supersedes prior
policy in the EPA's "Pay Administration Manual 3155, Chapter 3."
A new policy for Recruitment, Relocations, and Retention Incentives is currently
under review by agency officials. The new policy will supersede the 2013 policy
in HR Bulletin 14-001B.
Prior Audits
EPA Compliance With Retention Incentive Regulations and Policies
(Report No. 14-P-0245\ dated May 2,2014: The audit disclosed that the EPA
did not maintain documentation of the required annual recertification, and one
employee was paid a retention incentive for 4 years beyond the date of the
employee's promotion. The OIG recommended that the EPA: (1) determine if any
additional evidence exists to justify the incentive and, if unjustified, recover the
17-P-0407
2
-------
payments; and (2) pursue recovery of the unauthorized payments to employees
receiving pay beyond their promotion date or authorized end date. The EPA
addressed the recommendations and recovered $6,647 in overpayments.
EPA OIG Compliance With Retention Incentive Regulations and Policies
(Report No. 14-B-0246\ dated May 2,2014: The audit disclosed that two OIG
employees received incentives; however, documentation of the annual
recertification was not found. The report recommended that the OIG determine
whether any additional evidence existed to justify the incentives and, if
unjustified, refer the matter to the agency to initiate action to recover the
unauthorized payments. The OIG verified that no documentation existed due to
record retention policies and determined that the retention incentives were
justified.
Responsible Offices
In accordance with the EPA's policy, individual program and regional offices are
responsible for preparing retention incentive requests for personnel in their
offices. OARM's Office of Human Resources is responsible for reviewing and
preparing the final justification. The Office of Human Resources' Shared Service
Centers are responsible for processing the requests. The Office of Human
Resources is also responsible for establishing policy and procedures. The OCFO's
Office of the Controller is responsible for payroll support of the incentives and
conducting quarterly reviews of retention pay.
Scope and Methodology
We conducted this audit from March 2017 to August 2017, in accordance with
generally accepted government auditing standards issued by the Comptroller
General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis
for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe that
the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and
conclusions based on our audit objectives.
To address the objectives, we:
• Reviewed the agency's corrective actions, obtained supporting documents,
and interviewed OCFO and OARM staff and managers responsible for
implementation and monitoring of the actions.
• Reviewed policies, procedures and regulations pertaining to retention
incentives issued since the prior audit reports.
• Obtained and reviewed OARM's Office of Human Resources and
OCFO's internal review reports pertaining to retention incentives.
17-P-0407
3
-------
• Obtained a list of retention incentive payments made during the period
August 8, 2013, through February 4, 2017.
• Obtained and reviewed employee retention incentive files supporting the
incentive payments.
Based on acceptance of the response to the prior OIG audit, we limited our audit
of the OIG to retention incentive payments since the prior audit. Our initial work
identified no new payments by the OIG; consequently, we conducted no
additional work pertaining to the OIG and do not report further on the OIG.
Results of Audit
The agency completed the corrective actions in response to the prior audit
recommendations. However, the agency has not conducted monitoring of
retention incentives as required by the EPA's existing policy and 5 CFR §
575.312(a), or issued a new retention policy. In response to the prior OIG audit,
the agency stated it had drafted a new incentive policy to clearly delineate EPA's
implementation requirements and processes. These actions are needed to further
strengthen internal controls and to effectively resolve the cause of the prior audit
findings. We specifically noted the following:
• The monitoring reviews, including quarterly for pay and semiannually for
authorization, were not performed due to a misunderstanding of oversight
responsibilities between the various offices involved.
• The agency has drafted but not issued a new retention policy, as reported
to the OIG.
We also identified two requirements that should be included in the EPA's new
retention incentive policy—quarterly reviews and performance ratings. Without
an up-to-date policy, the agency has no assurance that retention incentives are
authorized and monitored consistent with its policy and federal requirements, or
that payments are valid.
For one of two employees who began receiving retention incentive payments after
the prior audit, the agency complied with retention incentive and recertification
requirements in its existing policy and 5 CFR Part 575, Subpart C. For the other
employee, the agency could not provide documentation to support approval for
the payments made. OCFO indicated the payments may have been the result of
payroll miscoding. As a result, we question $1,605 of retention incentive
payments due to irregularities identified with the payments.
17-P-0407
4
-------
Additional Actions Needed to Strengthen Internal Controls
In its response to the prior audit, the agency notified the OIG that it had taken
actions to strengthen its internal controls over retention incentives. The OIG was
unable to assess the implementation and adequacy of the controls because no EPA
employees were receiving new or existing retention incentives at the time of the
prior audit. The agency stated it has implemented the following:
• Quarterly reviews and reporting by OCFO to determine if any employee is
receiving a retention incentive or has been paid above the applicable
statutory pay cap.
• Semiannual reviews and reporting by the Office of Human Resources
and its Shared Service Centers to identify possible pay-cap and similar
noncompliance issues.
• Development of a new human resources incentive policy that clearly
delineates the EPA's implementation requirements and processes.
Our assessment under this audit showed that the agency has not (a) implemented a
quarterly or semiannual review process or (b) issued a new policy that will
include retention incentives. These issues are addressed below.
Quarterly and Semiannual Reviews and Reporting Not Implemented
While the agency required quarterly reviews by the OCFO in 2013, the
OCFO's own internal control assessments—conducted in 2014 and 2016—
found a lack of implementation of quarterly reviews of retention incentives.
In response, the agency stated that, on a quarterly basis, the OCFO was to
provide a list of employees receiving retention incentives to the Shared
Service Centers for review. A subsequent assessment conducted by the OCFO
in 2016 found that this action was not implemented. In response, the OCFO
stated that it will produce the quarterly report and provide it to the Office of
Human Resources for review starting in the third quarter of 2016.
Our review showed that the OCFO did not implement the quarterly review
process in 2016 as stated. We learned that while OCFO is responsible for
generating quarterly reports of retention incentive activity, the reports are not
reviewed by OCFO or the OARM Office of Human Resources. The reports
are provided to the Shared Service Center - Cincinnati, which considers the
reports as "information only" and to be used only for pay cap review.
Per OARM and OCFO officials, quarterly and semiannual reviews were not
performed due to a misunderstanding of oversight responsibilities between the
various offices—OCFO, OARM's Office of Human Resources (Policy
Division and Executive Services Division), and the Shared Service Centers.
Some of the confusion is that the Shared Service Centers no longer have a
17-P-0407
5
-------
primary role due to the migration of the EPA's payroll to a new system in
June 2014.
Based on our audit inquiries, the agency implemented a procedural change in
April 2017 in which OCFO will send the quarterly reports to all three Shared
Service Center Directors to review the validity of all current retention
incentive payments. Unlike OCFO, OARM has not taken action to address the
semiannual review process. Regulations at 5 CFR Part 575, Subpart C, require
the monitoring of retention incentives at least annually. Monitoring—whether
quarterly or semiannually—is needed to maintain consistency with federal
requirements and to prevent the potential for unauthorized incentives and
invalid payments.
New Retention Incentive Policy Not Issued
The agency developed the existing retention incentive policy in 2013, but has
not yet issued a new policy. In its response to the prior audit, the agency stated
it would finalize a new policy after OPM issues the new governmentwide
update of a recruitment, relocation and retention incentive directive. In
January 2016, OPM issued a guidance document that includes requirements
for retention incentives. Based on our discussion with OARM's Office of
Human Resources staff, the agency's new policy has been in draft form since
2014 and is currently under review by agency officials.
We also identified two requirements missing from the 2013 policy that should
be included in the new policy. First, as discussed above, there is no policy
statement that requires quarterly reviews and the reporting of retention
incentives by OCFO. Second, the 2013 policy does not discuss performance
rating requirements. The regulation at 5 CFR § 575.305(d) stipulates that a
retention incentive may only be paid when the employee's rating of record is
at least a "fully successful" or equivalent. Based on our review and
discussions with OARM and OCFO officials, it is understood that these are
requirements that should be followed even though they are not in the existing
policy.
Incentive Payments and Compliance With Policies and Regulations
We identified two EPA employees who started receiving retention incentive
payments after the prior audits. For the first employee, our review of the payment
data and supporting documentation showed that the approval for the retention
incentive and annual recertification complied with the requirements of 5 CFR Part
575, Subpart C, and the EPA's policy. The approval for the retention incentive was
made in July 2015 and recertified in September 2016.
We are questioning payments made to the second employee because the agency
did not have documentation to support an approval for the retention incentive
17-P-0407
6
-------
payments made. Payroll data as of April 15, 2017, showed that the employee
received retention incentive payments totaling $1,605 for the period January 8,
2017, through April 15, 2017. OCFO personnel said the payments may have been
made in error due to miscoding, as the employee was also receiving a Physician's
Comparability Allowance (PC A). A PCA may be paid to certain eligible federal
physicians who enter into service agreements with their agencies. Depending on
the physician's months of federal service and grade level, the allowance, with a
2-year service agreement, may include an incentive of up to $6,000.
Documentation supporting the PCA—provided by the OARM's Office of Human
Resources—showed that the employee was approved for a PCA and a 2-year
incentive of $6,000. The employee started receiving the PCA in June 2014.
OCFO payroll data as of May 2017 showed the employee continued to receive the
PCA. We were unable to determine whether the retention payments were valid or
the result of miscoding related to the PCA, because there is no documentation to
support a separate retention incentive payment or the basis for the payments.
Nonetheless, the employee has been receiving two types of incentive payments
since January 2017. As result, we are questioning the $1,605 in retention
incentives paid to the employee.
Conclusion
The agency effectively implemented actions to strengthen its internal controls
over the retention incentive approval and recertification process. However, while
the agency's guidance requires the monitoring of retention incentives, it has not
conducted these reviews as required by the EPA policy and federal requirements.
The irregular payment of $1,605 demonstrates the need for the monitoring
reviews. A new policy that includes all required elements would serve to reinforce
existing requirements and strengthen internal controls.
Recommendations
We recommend the Assistant Administrator for Administration and Resources
Management:
1. Implement a process for quarterly review of retention incentives for proper
authorization and payment.
2. Issue new policy on retention incentives, including requirements for
quarterly monitoring and performance ratings.
3. Determine the validity of the $1,605 in payments made to an employee
and, if invalid, discontinue payments and recover the funds paid.
17-P-0407
7
-------
EPA Response and OIG Comments
The agency agreed with the OIG's recommendations and provided corrective
actions with estimated completion dates. The agency's detailed response is in
Appendix A. The agency's corrective action for Recommendation 1 included
implementation of a process for a quarterly review of retention incentives, but the
response did not address semiannual reviews. In follow-up communications, the
agency clarified that the quarterly review process will eliminate the need for
semiannual reviews.
The OIG agrees with the agency's proposed corrective actions and completion
dates, as well as comments on the factual accuracy of the report. The OIG
modified the report to simplify Recommendation 1 and to clarify facts as
appropriate.
17-P-0407
8
-------
Status of Recommendations and
Potential Monetary Benefits
RECOMMENDATIONS
Potential
Planned
Monetary
Rec.
Page
Completion
Benefits
No.
No.
Subject
Status1
Action Official
Date
(in $000s)
7 Implement a process for quarterly review of retention incentives
for proper authorization and payment.
7 Issue new policy on retention incentives, including requirements
for quarterly monitoring and performance ratings.
Determine the validity of the $1,605 in payments made to an
employee and, if invalid, discontinue payments and recover the
funds paid.
Assistant Administrator for 12/31/17
Administration and
Resources Management
Assistant Administrator for 12/31/18
Administration and
Resources Management
Assistant Administrator for 3/31/18
Administration and
Resources Management
1 C = Corrective action completed.
R = Recommendation resolved with corrective action pending.
U = Recommendation unresolved with resolution efforts in progress.
17-P-0407
9
-------
Appendix A
EPA Response to Discussion Document
U^!T«0$TA7£$ ENVIRONMENTAL PROTSC^CN AO PNC*
•A'A^K IK tlK I Ml*; iH ~~ ^ivCKV UC»*i>*.N IP^wummCi IV j •i^n Jn<»pin (Vm'tHk Oi r( n\ii^n )r>r r%«*
P N : 'J* Vi V I .' W J > ,
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Offic e of Inspector General's
discussion docume nt on its follow-up revie w of the U S Environmental Protection Age ley's
compliance with retention incentive regulations and policies
The 0ARM requests an adj ustment to the fust rec omme ndation and concurs with the second
and third re commendations Our position and c omme nts on the re commendations and on the
report language are included as an attachment
Thank you for helping us improve this age ncy program If you have any questions or cone ems
regarding our response, please contact Ms Linda Gray director, Office of Human Resources
at (202)564-4606 or Gray Linda@epe gov
Attachment
cc John Showman
Linda Gray
Wesley Carpenter
David Bloom
Debbi Hart
Loretta Hunt
Chen Hembrey
Lauren Lemley
Manan Cooper
17-P-0407 10
TO:
t K(>M
-------
Attachment
Recommendation
Corrective Action
Estimated Completion
1. Implement a process for
quarterly review of incentive
payments made by
the Office of the Chief
Financial Officer and a
semiannual review by the
Office of Administration and
Resources Management's
Office of Human
Resources for proper
authorization.
The recommendation can be
simplified and strengthened. OCFO
has already committed to sending
quarterly reports to OARM. OCFO
will send the quarterly reports to
points of contact in the Human
Resources Shared Service Centers
and OHR's Policy and
Accountability Branch. PAB will
work with the SSCs to identify any
problems found in the reports and
recommend options for their
resolution. The OHR director will be
responsible for ensuring that all
problems are resolved.
December 31, 2017
2. Issue new policy on
retention incentives, including
requirements for
quarterly monitoring and
performance ratings.
OARM will issue a new policy that
includes requirements for quarterly
monitoring and performance ratings.
The new policy will be a part of the
agency's recruitment, relocation and
retention (3Rs) policy.
December 31, 2018
3. Determine the validity of
the $1,605 in payments made
to an employee and, if invalid,
discontinue payments and
recover the funds paid.
OCFO will work with OARM to
investigate the matter and will
discontinue payments and recover the
funds, if necessary.
March 31, 2018
The OARM does have some minor concerns about the text in the draft report. We ask that you
revise the report based on the following comments:
Page
Section
Comment for factual accuracy
Page 3
Responsible Offices
2nd Sentence: OARM/OHR is
responsible for reviewing and
preparing the final justification. The
servicing HR Shared Service Center
processes the retention incentive.
Throughout the
discussion document
See comment
Throughout: Please replace
"retention incentive award" with
"retention incentive payment. "
Incentive payments are not awards.
17-P-0407
11
-------
Appendix B
Distribution
The Administrator
Chief of Staff
Chief of Staff for Operations
Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations
Assistant Administrator for Administration and Resources Management
Chief Financial Officer
Agency Follow-Up Coordinator
General Counsel
Associate Administrator for Congressional and Intergovernmental Relations
Associate Administrator for Public Affairs
Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator for Administration and Resources Management
Associate Chief Financial Officer
Controller, Office of the Controller, Office of the Chief Financial Officer
Director, Office of Human Resources, Office of Administration and Resources Management
Director, Office of Resources, Operations, and Management, Office of Administration and
Resources Management
Deputy Director, Office of Resources, Operations, and Management, Office of Administration
and Resources Management
Audit Follow-Up Coordinator, Office of the Administrator
Audit Follow-Up Coordinator, Office of Administration and Resources Management
17-P-0407
12
------- |