EPA/600/R-92/003i
March 1992
EMISSIONS OF METALS, CHROMIUM AND NICKEL SPECIES, AND ORGANICS
FROM MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER SLUDGE INCINERATORS
VOLUME IX: SITE 9 EMISSION TEST REPORT - APPENDICES
Prepared by:
Robin R. Segall
Entropy Environmentalists, Inc.
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
William G. DeWees
DEECO, Inc.
Cary, North Carolina 27519
F. Michael Lewis
Mountain View, California 94040
EPA Contract No. 68-CO-0027
Work Assignment No. 0-5
Technical Managers:
Harry E. Bostian, Ph.D.
Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Eugene P. Crumpler
Office of Water
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D.C. 20460
RISK REDUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45268
-------
DISCLAIMER
This material has been funded wholly or in part by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency's Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory and Office
of Water under Contract No. 68-02-4442, Work Assignment No. 81; Contract No. 68-02-
4462, Work Assignment No. 90-108; and Contract No. 68-C0-0027, Work Assignment No.
0-5. It has been subject to the Agency's review and it has been approved for publication
as an EPA document. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not
constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
ii
-------
FOREWORD
Today's rapidly developing and changing technologies and industrial products and
practices frequently carry with them the increased generation of materials that, if
improperly dealt with, can threaten both public health and the environment. The U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency is charged by Congress with protecting the Nation's
land, air. and water resources. Under a mandate of national environmental laws, the
agency strives to formulate and implement actions leading to a compatible balance
between human activities and the ability of natural systems to support and nurture life.
These laws direct the EPA to perform research to define our environmental problems,
measure the impacts, and search for solutions.
The Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory is responsible for planning,
implementing, and managing research, development, and demonstration programs to
provide an authoritative, defensible engineering basis in support of the policies,
programs, and regulations of the EPA with respect to drinking water, wastewater,
pesticides, toxic substances, solid and hazardous wastes, and Superfund-related activities.
This publication is one of the products of that research and provides a vital
communication link between the research and the user community.
The problem of disposing of primary and secondary sludge generated at municipal
wastewater treatment facilities is one of growing concern. Sludge of this type may
contain toxics such as heavy metals and various organic species. Viable sludge disposal
options include methods of land disposal or incineration. In determining the
environmental hazards associated with incineration, the Risk Reduction Engineering
Laboratory and the Office of Water have sponsored a program to monitor the emissions
of metals and organics from a series of municipal wastewater sludge incinerators. The
following document presents the final results from the Site 9 emissions test program.
E. Timothy Oppelt, Director
Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory
iii
-------
ABSTRACT
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Water (OW) has
drafted risk-based sludge regulations under Section 405d of the Clean Water Act and
EPA's Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory (RREL) has been assisting OW in the
collection of supporting data for the proposed regulations. Proposed regulations and a
solicitation for public comment were published in the Federal Register on February 6,
1989. Final regulations are scheduled for publication in the Federal Register in January
1992. Because of the associated cancer risk, there is particular concern regarding
chromium and nickel species in the emissions from sludge incineration.
An RREL/OWRS research program was implemented to determine the ratios of
hexavalent to total chromium and nickel subsulfide to total nickel in sewage sludge
incinerator emissions under varied incinerator operating conditions. Site 9, a multiple
hearth incinerator, was tested under normal combustion conditions and improved
combustion conditions. This report presents the test results from the fifth of five
incinerator test sites. Four incinerators tested under a previous project conducted by
Radian Corporation are included in the Site numbering convention used.
Secondary objectives of the Site 9 test program included comparing the results for
chromium and nickel subspecies determined by different analytical procedures, gathering
data on other metals and inorganic/organic gases in the incinerator emissions, and
assessing pollutant removal efficiencies by measuring emissions at both the inlet and
outlet to the venturi/impingement tray scrubber control system, and at the outlet of a
full scale wet electrostatic precipitator installed just prior to the test program.
Site 9, a dewatering and incineration facility located in a municipal wastewater
treatment plant, is operated and managed by a private firm. The hydraulic portion of
the plant is owned and operated by the city in which it is located. The facility is a
secondary plant designed for a 15 million gallon per day (MGD) wastewater flow. The
privatized solids handling portion of the facility is a regional site that also handles both
primary and secondary thickened sludges brought in from surrounding communities.
Site 9 includes a seven (7) hearth, multiple hearth furnace (MHF) built by Nichols
Engineering in 1974. The furnace flue gas leaves the furnace through a horizontal
breaching and then goes down into an adjustable throat venturi scrubber with a nominal
pressure drop of 20 in water column (w.c.). After leaving the venturi, the gases pass
upward through a three (3) plate tray scrubber with a Chevron mist eliminator. A 10 ft x
10 ft, upflow, wet electrostatic precipitator, manufactured by Beltran Associates, Inc., was
installed during the first week of testing.
iv
-------
It was anticipated that the nickel subsulfide emissions from a multiple hearth
incinerator not using lime for conditioning would constitute less than 1% of the total
nickel emissions. A wet chemical analysis indicated that within the analytical detection
limit (< 10% of the total nickel), no nickel subsulfide was present in the samples.
It was anticipated that the hexavalent chromium emissions from a multiple hearth
incinerator not using lime for sludge conditioning would constitute less than 1% of the
total chromium emissions. A wet chemical analysis indicated that about 10% of the total
chromium emissions exiting the venturi/impingement tray scrubber during both normal
and improved combustion conditions was hexavalent chromium.
Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and furans (PCDDs/PCDFs) and semivolatile and
volatile organic compounds were also measured. The total PCDD's and total PCDF's,
respectively, were 20.2 and 81.9 ng/dscm at the outlet of venturi/impingement tray
scrubber (midpoint sampling location) and 3.2 and 12.4 ng/dscm at the outlet of the wet
ESP during normal incinerator operation. During improved incinerator operation, the
total PCDD's and total PCDF's, respectively, were 1.6 and 7.1 ng/dscm at the midpoint
and 0.65 and 2.1 ng/dscm at the outlet. Several semivolatile organic compounds were
detected at the midpoint and outlet locations during runs at both normal and improved
incinerator operation. The concentrations and number of semivolatile compounds
measured were typically less under improved incinerator operating conditions.
This report was submitted in fulfillment of Work Assignments under Contract
Nos. 68-02-4442, 68-02-4462, and 68-C0-0027 from the Risk Reduction Engineering
Laboratory under the sponsorship of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
v
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
Disclaimer ii
Foreword iii
Abstract iv
Appendix A Incinerator and Scrubber Operating Data A-l
Appendix B Sampling and Analytical Methods B-l
Appendix C Sample Calculations C-l
Appendix D Analytical Data and Reports D-l
Appendix E CEM Data, Calibrations/One-min Averages E-la
Appendix F External Audit Report F-l
vi
-------
Appendix A
Incinerator and Scrubber
Operating Data
A-l
-------
Appendix B
Sampling and
Analytical Methods
B-l
-------
DRAFT 8/28/89
METHODOLOGY FOR THE DETERMINATION OF METALS EMISSIONS IN EXHAUST GASES
FROM HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATION AND SIMILAR COMBUSTION PROCESSES
1. Applicability and Principle
1.1 Applicability. This method is applicable for the determination of
total chromium (Cr), cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As), nickel (Ni), manganese (Mn),
beryllium (Be), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), lead (Pb), selenium (Se), phosphorus
(P), thallium (Tl), silver (Ag), antimony (Sb), barium (Ba), and mercury (Hg)
emissions from hazardous waste incinerators and similar combustion processes.
This method may also be used for the determination of particulate emissions
following the additional procedures described. Modifications to the sample
recovery and analysis procedures described in this protocol for the purpose of
determining particulate emissions may potentially impact the front half mercury
determination.*
1.2 Principle. The stack sample is withdrawn isokinetically from the
source, with particulate emissions collected in the probe and on a heated
filter and gaseous emissions collected in a series of chilled impingers
containing a solution of dilute nitric acid in hydrogen peroxide in two
impingers, and acidic potassium permanganate solution in two (or one)
impingers. Sampling train components are recovered and digested in separate
front and back half fractions. Materials collected in the sampling train are
digested with acid solutions to dissolve inorganics and to remove organic
constituents that may create analytical interferences. Acid digestion is
performed using conventional Parr* Bomb or microwave digestion techniques. The
nitric acid and hydrogen peroxide impinger solution, the acidic potassium
permanganate impinger solution, and the probe rinse and digested filter
solutions are analyzed for mercury by cold vapor atomic absorption spectroscopy
(CVAAS). Except for the permanganate solution, the remainder of the sampling
*Field tests to date have shown that of the total amount of mercury measured
by the method, only 0 to <2% was measured in the front half. Therefore, it is
tentatively concluded, based on the above data, that particulate emissions may
be measured by this train, without significantly altering the mercury results.
B-2
-------
train catches are analyzed for Cr, Cel. Ni, Mn, Be, Cu, Zn, Pb, Se, P, Tl, Ag,
Sb, Ba, and As by inductively coupled argon plasma emission spectroscopy (ICAP)
or atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS). Graphite furnace atonic absorption
spectroscopy (GFAAS) is used for analysis of antimony, arsenic, cadmium, lead,
selenium, and thallium, if these elements require greater analytical
sensitivity than can be obtained by ICAP. Additionally, if desired, the tester
may use AAS for analyses of all metals if the resulting in-stack method
detection limits meet the goal of the testing program. For convenience,
aliquots of each digested sample fraction can be combined proportionally for a
single analytical determination. The efficiency of the analytical procedure is
quantified by the analysis of spiked quality control samples containing each of
the target metals including actual sample matrix effects checks.
2, Range, Sensitivity, Precision, and Interferences
2.1 Range. For the analyses described in this methodology and for similar
analyses, the ICAP response is linear over several orders of magnitude. Sam-
ples containing metal concentrations in the nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml) to
micrograms per milliliter (ug/ml) range in the analytical finish solution can
be analyzed using this technique. Samples containing greater than
approximately 50 ug/ml of chromium, lead, or arsenic should be diluted to that
level or lower for final analysis. Samples containing greater than
approximately 20 ug/ml of cadmium should be diluted to that level before
analysis.
2.2 Analytical Sensitivity. ICAP analytical detection limits for the
sample solutions (based on SW-8^6, Method 6010) are approximately as follows:
Sb (32 ng/ml). As (53 ng/ml), Ba (2 ng/ml), Be (0.3 ng/ml), Cd (4 ng/ml), Cr (7
ng/ml), Cu (6 ng/ml), Pb {b2 ng/ml), Mn (2 ng/ml), Ni (15 ng/ml), P (75 ng/ml),
Se (75 ng/ml), Ag (7 ng/ml), Ti (1*0 ng/ml), and Zn (2 ng/ml). The actual
method detection limits are sample dependent and may vary as the sample matrix
may affect the limits. The analytical detection limits for analysis by direct
aspiration AAS (based on SW-846, Method 7000) are approximately as follows: Sb
(200 ng/ml). As (2 ng/ml), Ba (100 ng/ml). Be (5 ng/ml), Cd (5 ng/ml), Cr (50
ng/ml), Cu (20 ng/ml), Pb (100 ng/ml), Mn (10 ng/ml), Ni (40 ng/ml), Se (2
ng/ml), Ag (10 ng/ml), Tl (100 ng/ml), and Zn (5 ng/ml). The detection limit
for mercury by CVAAS is approximately 0.2 ng/ml. The use of GFAAS can give
added sensitivity compared to the use of direct aspiration AAS for the
B-3
-------
following metals: Sb (3 ng/ml). As (1 ng/ml), Be (0.2 ng/ml), Cd (0.1 ng/ml),
Cr (1 ng/ml), Pb (1 ng/ml), Se (2 ng/ml), and T1 (1 ng/ml).
Using (1) the procedures described in this method, (2) the analytical
detection limits described in the previous paragraph, (3) a volume of 300 ml
for the front half and 150 ml for the back half samples, and (4) a stack gas
sample volume of 1.25 ~ the corresponding in-stack method detection limits
are presented in Table A-l and calculated as shown:
where: A = analytical detection limit, ug/ml.
B = volume of sample prior to aliquot for analysis, ml.
C = stack'sample volume, dscm (dsm3).
D = in-stack detection limit, ug/m3.
Values in Table A-l are calculated for the front and back half and/or the total
train.
To ensure optimum sensitivity in obtaining the measurements, the
concentrations of target metals in the solutions are suggested to be at least
ten times the analytical detection limits. Under certain conditions, and with
greater care in the analytical procedure, this concentration can be as low as
approximately three times the analytical detection limit. In all cases,
repetitive analyses, method of standard additions (MSA), serial dilution, or
matrix spike addition should be used to establish the quality of the data.
Actual in-stack method detection limits will be determined based on actual
source sampling parameters and analytical results as described above. If
required, the method in-stack detection limits can be made more sensitive than
those shown in Table A-l for a specific test by using one or more of the
following options:
o A normal 1-hour sampling run collects a stack gas sampling volume of
about 1.25 o3. If the sampling time is increased and 5 m3 are
collected, the in-stack method detection limits would be one fourth of
the values shown in Table A-l (this means that with this change, the
method is four times more sensitive than normal).
o The in-stack detection limits assume that all of the sample is digested
(with exception of the aliquot for mercury) and the final liquid
volumes for analysis are 300 ml for the front half and 150 ml for the
B-4
-------
TABLE A-l, IN-STACK METHOD DETECTION LIMITS (ug/m3)
FOR TRAIN FRACTIONS USING ICAP AND AAS
Front Half Back Halfj Back Half2
Fraction 1 Fraction 2 Fraction 3 Total Train
Metal Probe and Filter Impingers 1-3 Impingers 4-5
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Phosphorus
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
7-7 (0.7)*
12.7 (0.3)*
0.5
10.1 (0.2)*
0.5 (0.2)*
0.05**.
18 (0.5)*
1.7
3.6
18
0.07 (0.05)*
1.0 (0.02)*
1.7 (0.2)*
1.4
9.6 (0.2)*
0.5
3.8 (0.4)*
6.4 (0.1)*
0.3
0.04 (0.03)*
0.5 (0.01)*
0.8 (0.1)*
0.7
5.0 (0.1)*
0.2 (0.1)*
0.03**
1.8
9
9 (0.3)*
0.9
4.8 (0.1)*
0.3
0.03** 0.11**
5.4
27
27 (0.8)*
2.6
14.4 (0.3)*
0.8
11.5 (1.1)*
19.1 (0.4)*
0.8
0.11 (0.08)*
1.5 (0.03)*
2-5 (0.3)*
2.1
15-1 (0.3)*
0.7 (0.3)*
( )* Detection limit when analyzed by GFAAS.
** Detection limit when analyzed by CVAAS.
Actual method in-stack detection limits will be determined based
on actual source sampling parameters and analytical results as
described earlier in this section.
back half sample. If the front half volume is reduced from 300 ml to
30 ml, the front half in-stack detection limits would be one tenth of
the values shown above (ten times more sensitive). If the back half
volume is reduced from 150 ml to 25 ml. the in-stack detection limits
would be one sixth of the above values. Matrix effects checks are
necessary on analyses of samples and typically are of greater signifi-
cance for samples that have been concentrated to less than the normal
sample volume. A volume less than 25 ml may not allow resolubiliza-
tion of the residue and may increase interference by other compounds,
o When both of the above two improvements are used on one sample at the
same time, the resultant improvements are multiplicative. For example,
where stack gas volume is increased by a factor of five and the total
liquid sample digested volume of both the front and back halves is
reduced by factor of six, the in-stack method detection limit is
reduced by a factor of thirty (the method is thirty times more
sensitive).
B-5
-------
o Conversely, reducing stack gas sample volume and increasing sample
liquid volume will increase limits. The front half and back halfx
samples (Fractions 1 and 2) can be combined prior to analysis. The
resultant liquid volume (excluding Fraction 3. which must be analyzed
separately) is recorded. Combining the sample as described does not
allow determination (whether front or back half) of where in the train
the sample was captured. The in-stack method detection limit then
becomes a single value for all metals except mercury, for which the
contribution of Fraction 3 must be considered.
o The above discussion assumes no blank correction. Blank corrections
are discussed later in this method.
2.3 Precision. ' The precisions (relative standard deviation) for each
metal detected in a method development test at a sewage sludge incinerator, are
as follows: Sb {12.7*). As (13-52), Ba (20.62), Cd (11.5*), Cr (11.2%), Cu
(11,52). Pb (11.62), P (14.62), Se (15.3*). T1 (12.32), and Zn (11.82). The
precision for nickel was 7*72 for another test conducted at a source simulator.
Beryllium, manganese and silver were not detected in the tests; however, based
on the analytical sensitivity of the 1CAP for these metals, it is assumed that
their precisions should be similar to those for the other metals, when detected
at similar levels.
2.4 Interferences. Iron can be a spectral interference during the
analysis of arsenic, chromium, and cadmium by ICAP. Aluminum can be a spectral
interference during the analysis of arsenic and lead by ICAP. Generally, these
interferences can be reduced by diluting the sample, but this increases the
method detection limit. Refer to EPA Method 6010 (SW-846) for details on '
potential interferences for this method. For all GFAAS analyses, matrix
modifiers should be used to limit interferences, and standards should be matrix
matched.
3. Apparatus
3*1 Sampling Train. A schematic of the sampling train is shown in Figure
A-l. It is similar to the Method 5 train. The sampling train consists of the
following components.
3.1.1 Probe Nozzle (Probe Tip) and Borosilicate or Quartz Glass Probe
Liner. Same as Method 5. Sections 2.1.1 and 2.1.2. Glass nozzles are required
unless an alternate probe tip prevents the possibility of contamination or
B-6
-------
All glass sample exposed surface to here.
(Except when Teflon filter support is used.;
Thermometer
Glass
Rlter
Holder
Thermocouple Check
T Valve
Thermocoupli
Glass
Probe
Glass probe liner
Implngers with
Absorbing Solutions
Heated Area
Reverse-Type
Pilot Tube
Ice Bath
Pltot
Manometer
Silica Gel
Empty (Optional Knockout)
5% HNO 3 /10% H o O
4% KNViO 4/10%H2SO4
Bypass
Valve
Vacuum
Line —
Vacuum
Gauge
Thermocouples
Orifice
Main
Valve
III H
Alr-Tlght
Pump
Dry Gas
Meter ,
4174 7/89
Figure A-1. Schematic of multiple metals sampling train.
-------
interference of the sample with its materials of construction. If a probe tip
other than glass is used, no correction of the stack sample test results can be
made because of the effect on the results by the probe tip.
3.1.2 Pitot Tube and Differential Pressure Gauge. Same as Method 2,
Sections 2.1 and 2.2, respectively.
3.1.3 Filter Holder. Glass, same as Method 5. Section 2.1.5. except that
a Teflon filter support must be used to replace the glass frit.
3.1.4 Filter Heating System. Same as Method 5» Section 2.1.6.
3.1.5 Condenser. The following system shall be used for the condensation
and collection of gaseous metals and for determining the moisture content of
the stack gas. The condensing system should consist of four to six impingers
connected in series with leak-free ground glass fittings or other leak-free,
non-contaminating fittings. The first impinger is optional and is recommended
as a water knockout trap for use during test conditions which require such a
trap. The impingers to be used in the metals train are now described. When
the first impinger is used as a water knockout, it shall be appropriately-sized
for an expected large moisture catch and constructed generally as described for
the first impinger in Method 5. Paragraph 2.1.7- The second impinger (or the
first HN03/H202 impinger) shall also be as described for the first impinger in
Method 5* The third impinger (or the impinger used as the second HNC^/HjOj
impinger) shall be the same as the Greenburg Smith Impinger with the standard
tip described as the second impinger in Method 5. Paragraph 2.1.7• All other
impingers used in the metals train are the same as the second impinger (the
first HN03/H202 impinger) previously described in this paragraph. In summary,
the first impinger should be empty, the second and third shall contain known
quantities of a nitric acid/hydrogen peroxide solution (Section 4.2.1), the
fourth (and fifth, if required) shall contain a known quantity of acidic
potassium permanganate solution (Section 4.2.2), and the last impinger shall
contain a known quantity of silica gel or equivalent desiccant. A thermometer
capable of measuring to within 1°C (2°F) shall be placed at the outlet of the
last impinger. When the water knockout impinger is not needed, it is removed
from the train and the other impingers remain the same. If mercury analysis is
not needed, the potassium permanganate impingers are removed.
3.1.6 Metering System, Barometer, and Gas Density Determination
Equipment. Same as Method 5* Sections 2.1.8 through 2.1.10, respectively.
B-8
-------
3.1.7 Teflon Tape. For capping openings and sealing connections on the
sampling train.
3.2 Sample Recovery. Same as Method 5» Sections 2.2.1 through 2.2.8
(Nonmetallic Probe-Liner and Probe-Nozzle Brushes, Wash Bottles, Sample
Storage Containers, Petri Dishes, Glass Graduated Cylinder, Plastic Storage
Containers, Funnel and Rubber Policeman, and Glass Funnel), respectively, with
the following exceptions and additions:
3.2.1 Nonmetallic Probe-Liner and Probe-Nozzle Brushes, For quantitative
recovery of materials collected in the front half of the sampling train.
Description of acceptable all-Teflon component brushes to be included in EPA's
Emission Measurement Technical Information Center (EMTIC) files.
3.2.2 Sample Storage Containers. Glass bottles with Teflon-lined caps,
1000- and 500-ml, shall be used for KMn06-containing samples and blanks.
Polyethylene bottles may be used for other sample types.
3.2.3 Graduated Cylinder. Glass or equivalent.
3.2.4 Funnel. Glass or equivalent.
3»2.5 Labels. For identification of samples.
3.2.6 Polypropylene Tweezers and/or Plastic Gloves. For recovery of the
filter from the sampling train filter holder.
3-3 Sample Preparation and Analysis. For the analysis, the following
equipment is needed:
3.3.1 Volumetric Flasks, 100 ml, 250 ml, and 1000 ml. For preparation of
standards and sample dilution.
3.3.2 Graduated Cylinders. For preparation of reagents.
3-3'3 ParrR Bombs or Microwave Pressure Relief Vessels with Capping
Station (CEM Corporation model or equivalent).
3.3-4 Beakers and Watchglasses. 250 ml beakers for sample digestion with
watchglasses to cover the tops.
3.3.5 Ring Stands and Clamps. For securing equipment such as filtration
apparatus.
3.3.6 Filter Funnels. For holding filter paper.
3.3.7 Whatman 5^1 Filter Paper (or equivalent). For filtration of
digested samples.
3-3*8 Disposable Pasteur Pipets and Bulbs.
3.3.9 Volumetric Pipets.
3-3Analytical Balance. Accurate to within 0.1 mg.
B-9
-------
3.3.11 Microwave or Conventional Oven. For heating samples at fixed
power levels or temperatures.
3.3-12 Hot Plates.
3.3.13 Atomic Absorption Spectrometer (AAS). Equipped with a background
corrector.
3.3.13.1 Graphite Furnace Attachment. With antimony, arsenic, cadmium,
lead, selenium, thallium, and hollow cathode lamps (HCLs) or electrodeless
discharge lamps (EDLs). Same as EPA Methods 7041 (antimony), 7060 (arsenic),
7131 (cadmium), 7421 (lead), 7740 (selenium), and 7841 (thallium).
3.3.13-2 Cold Vapor Mercury Attachment. With a mercury HCL or EDL. The
equipment needed for the cold vapor mercury attachment includes an air
recirculation pump, ft quartz cell, an aerator apparatus, and a heat lamp or
desiccator tube. The heat lamp should be capable of raising the ambient
temperature at the quartz cell by 10°C such that no condensation forms on the
wall of the quartz cell. Same as EPA Method 7470.
3.3.14 Inductively Coupled Argon Plasma Spectrometer. With either a
direct or sequential reader and an alumina torch. Same as EPA Method 6010.
4. Reagents
Unless otherwise indicated, it is intended that all reagents conform to
the specifications established by the Committee on Analytical Reagents of the
American Chemical Society, where such specifications are available; otherwise,
use the best available grade.
4.1 Sampling. The reagents used in sampling are as follows:
4.1.1 Filters. The filters shall contain less than 1.3 ug/in.2 of each of
the metals to be measured. Analytical results provided by filter manufacturers
are acceptable. However, if no such results are available, filter blanks must
be analyzed for each target metal prior to emission testing. Quartz fiber or
glass fiber filters without organic binders shall be used. The filters should
exhibit at least 99*95 percent efficiency (<0.05 percent penetration) on 0.3
micron dioctyl phthalate smoke particles. "Hie filter efficiency test shall be
conducted in accordance with ASTM Standard Method D2986-71 (incorporated by
reference). For particulate determination in sources containing S02 or S03,
the filter material must be of a type that is unreactive to S02 or S03, as
described in EPA Method 5» Quartz fiber filters meeting these requirements are
recommended.
B-10
-------
4.1.2 Water. To conform to ASTM Specification D1193-77t Type II
(incorporated by reference). Analyze the water for all target metals prior to
field use. All target metals should be less than 1 ng/ml.
4.1.3 Nitric Acid. Concentrated. Baker Instra-analyzed or equivalent.
4.1.4 Hydrochloric Acid. Concentrated. Baker Instra-analyzed or
equivalent.
4.1.5 Hydrogen Peroxide, 30 Percent (V/V).
4.1.6 Potassium Permanganate.
4.1.7 Sulfuric Acid. Concentrated.
4.1.8 Silica Gel and Crushed Ice. Same as Method 5. Sections 3-1-2 and
3.1.4, respectively.
4.2 Pretest Preparation for Sampling Reagents.
4.2.1 Nitric Acid (HN03)/Hydrogen Peroxide (HjOj) Absorbing Solution,
5 Percent HN03/10 Percent H202. Add 50 ml of concentrated HN03 and 333 ml of
30 percent H202 to a 1000-ml volumetric flask or graduated cylinder containing
approximately 500 ml of water. Dilute to volume with water. The reagent shall
contain less than 2 ng/ml of each target metal.
4.2.2 Acidic Potassium Permanganate (KMn04) Absorbing Solution, 4 Percent
KMnOft (W/V). Prepare fresh daily. Dissolve 40 g of KMnOA in sufficient 10
percent f^SO^ to make 1 liter. Prepare and store in glass bottles to prevent
degradation. The reagent shall contain less than 2 ng/ml of Hg.
Precaution: To prevent autocatalytic decomposition of the permanganate
solution, filter the solution through Whatman 5^1 filter paper. Also, due to
reaction of the potassium permanganate with the acid, there may be pressure
buildup in the sample storage bottle; these bottles should not be fully filled
and should be vented both to relieve excess pressure and prevent explosion due
to pressure buildup. Venting is highly recommended, but should not allow
contamination of the sample; a No. 70-72 hole drilled in the container cap and
Teflon liner has been used.
4.2.3 Nitric Acid, 0.1 N. Add 6.3 ml of concentrated HN03 (70 percent) to
a graduated cylinder containing approximately 900 ml of water. Dilute to 1000
ml with water. Mix well. The reagent shall contain less than 2 ng/ml of each
target metal.
4.2.4 Hydrochloric Acid (HC1), 8 N. Add 690 ml of concentrated HC1 to a
graduated cylinder containing 250 ml of water. Dilute to 1000 ml with water.
Mix well. The reagent shall contain less than 2 ng/ml of Hg.
B-11
-------
4.3 Glassware Cleaning Reagents.
4.3.1 Nitric Acid, Concentrated. Fisher ACS grade or equivalent.
4.3-2 Water. To conform to ASTM Specifications D1193"77. Type II.
4.3*3 Nitric Acid, 10 Percent (V/V). Add 500 ml of concentrated HN03 to a
graduated cylinder containing approximately 4000 ml of water. Dilute to 5000
ml with water.
4.4 Sample Digestion and Analysis Reagents.
4.4.1 Hydrochloric Acid. Concentrated.
4.4.2 Hydrofluoric Acid, Concentrated.
4.4.3 Nitric Acid, Concentrated. Baker Instra-analyzed or equivalent.
4.4.4 Nitric Acid, 10 Percent (V/V). Add 100 ml of concentrated HNO^ to
800 ml of water. Dilute to 1000 ml with water. Mix well. Reagent shall
contain less than 2 ng/ml of each target metal.
4.4.5 Nitric Acid, 5 Percent (V/V). Add 50 ml of concentrated HN03 to
800 ml of water. Dilute to 1000 ml with water. Reagent shall contain less
than 2 ng/ml of each target metal.
4.4.6 Water. To conform to ASTM Specifications D1193~77t Type II.
4.4.7 Hydroxylamine Hydrochloride and Sodium Chloride Solution. See EPA
Method 7470 for preparation.
4.4.8 Stannous Chloride.
4.4.9 Potassium Permanganate, 5 Percent (W/V)«
4.4.10 Sulfuric Acid, Concentrated.
4.4.11 Nitric Acid, 50 Percent (V/V).
4.4.12 Potassium Persulfate, 5 Percent (W/V).
4.4.13 Nickel Nitrate, Ni(N03)2*6H20.
4.4.14
Lanthanum
Oxide, La^^
4.4.15
AAS
Grade
Hg
Standard,
1000
ug/ml.
4.4.16
AAS
Grade
Pb
Standard,
1000
ug/ml.
4.4.17
AAS
Grade
As
Standard,
1000
ug/ml.
4.4.18
AAS
Grade
Cd
Standard,
1000
ug/ml.
4.4.19
AAS
Grade
Cr
Standard,
1000
ug/ml.
4.4.20
AAS
Grade
Sb
Standard,
1000
ug/ml.
4.4.21
AAS
Grade
Ba
Standard,
1000
ug/ml.
4.4.22
AAS
Grade
Be
Standard,
1000
ug/ml.
4.4.23
AAS
Grade
Cu
Standard,
1000
ug/ml.
4.4.24
AAS
Grade
Mn
Standard,
1000
ug/ml.
B-12
©
-------
4.4.25 AAS Grade Ni Standard, 1000 ug/ml.
4.4.26 AAS Grade P Standard, 1000 ug/ml.
4.4.27 AAS Grade Se Standard, 1000 ug/ml.
4.4.28 AAS Grade Ag Standard, 1000 ug/ml.
4.4.29 AAS Grade T1 Standard, 1000 ug/ml.
4.4.30 AAS Grade Zn Standard, 1000 ug/ml.
4.4.31 AAS Grade A1 Standard, 1000 ug/ml.
4.4.32 AAS Grade Fe Standard, 1000 ug/ml.
4.4.33 The metals standards may also be made from solid chemicals as
described in EPA Method 200.7* EPA Method 7470 or Standard Methods for the
Analysis of Water and Wastewater. 15th Edition, Method 303F should be referred
to for additional information on mercury standards.
4.4.34 Mercury Standards and Quality Control Samples. Prepare fresh
weekly a 10 ug/ml intermediate mercury standard by adding 5 ml of 1000 ug/ml
mercury stock solution to a 500 ml volumetric flask; dilute to 500 ml by first
adding 20 ml of 15 percent HN03 and then adding water. Prepare a working
mercury standard solution fresh daily: add 5 of the 10 ug/ml intermediate
standard to a 250 ml volumetric flask and dilute to 250 ml with 5 ml of
4 percent KMn04, 5 ml of 15 percent HN03 , and then water. At least six
separate aliquots of the working mercury standard solution should be used to
prepare the standard curve. These aliquots should contain 0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3-0,
4.0, and 5-0 ml of the working standard solution. Quality control samples
should be prepared by making a separate 10 ug/ml standard and diluting until in
the range of the calibration.
4.4.35 ICAP Standards and Quality Control Samples. Calibration standards
for ICAP analysis can be combined into four different mixed standard solutions
as shown below.
MIXED STANDARD SOLUTIONS FOR ICAP ANALYSIS
Solution Elements
I As, Be, Cd, Mn, Pb, Se, Zn
II Ba, Cu, Fe
III Al, Cr, Ni
IV Ag, P, Sb, T1
Prepare these standards by combining and diluting the appropriate volumes of
the 1000 ug/ml solutions with 5 percent nitric acid. A minimum of one stan-
dard and a blank can be used to form each calibration curve. However, a
B-13
-------
separate quality control sample spiked with known amounts of the target metals
in quantities in the midrange of the calibration curve should be prepared.
Suggested standard levels are 50 ug/ml for Al, 25 ug/ml for Cr and Pb, 15 ug/ml
for Fe, and 10 ug/ml for the remaining elements. Standards containing less
than 1 ug/ml of metal should be prepared daily. Standards containing greater
than 1 ug/ml of metal should be stable for a minimum of 1 to 2 weeks.
4.4.36 Graphite Furnace AAS Standards for Antimony, Arsenic, Cadmium,
Lead, Selenium, and Thallium. Prepare a 10 ug/ml standard by adding 1 ml of
1000 ug/ml standard to a 100 ml volumetric flask. Dilute to 100 ml with 10
percent nitric acid. For graphite furnace AAS, the standards must be matrix
matched; e.g., if the samples contain 6 percent nitric acid and 4 percent
hydrofluoric acid, the standards should also be made up with 6 percent nitric
acid and 4 percent hydrofluoric acid. Prepare a 100 ng/ml standard by adding
1 ml of the 10 ug/ml standard to a 100 ml volumetric flask and dilute to 100 ml
with the appropriate matrix solution. Other standards should be prepared by
dilution of the 100 ng/ml standards. At least five standards should be used to
make up the standard curve. Suggested levels are 0, 10, 50, 75* and 100 ng/ml.
Quality control samples should be prepared by making a separate 10 ug/ml
standard and diluting until it is in the range of the samples. Standards
containing less than 1 ug/ml of metal should be prepared dally. Standards
containing greater than 1 ug/ml of metal should be stable for a minimum of 1 to
2 weeks.
4.4.37 Matrix Modifiers.
4.4.37*1 Nickel Nitrate, 1 Percent {V/V). Dissolve 4.956 g of
Ni{N03)2*SHjO in approximately 50 ml of water in a 100 ml volumetric flask.
Dilute to 100 ml with water.
4.4.37*2 Nickel Nitrate, One-tenth Percent (V/V). Dilute 10 ml of 1 per-
cent nickel nitrate solution to 100 ml with water. Inject an equal amount of
sample and this modifier into the graphite furnace during AAS analysis for As.
4.4.37-3 Lanthanum. Dissolve 0.5664 g of L^O^ in 10 ml of concentrated
HN03 and dilute to 100 ml with water. Inject an equal amount of sample and
this modifier into the graphite furnace during AAS analysis for Pb.
5. Procedure
5.1 Sampling. The complexity of this method is such that, to obtain reli-
able results, testers should be trained and experienced with the test procedures.
B-14
-------
5,1.1 Pretest Preparation. Follow the same general procedure given in
Method 5. Section 4.1.1, except that, unless particulate emissions are to be
determined, the filter need not be desiccated or weighed. All sampling train
glassware should first be rinsed with hot tap water and then washed in hot
soapy water. Next, glassware should be rinsed three times with tap water,
followed by three additional rinses with water. All glassware should then be
soaked in a 10 percent (V/V) nitric acid solution for a minimum of 4 hours,
rinsed three times with water, rinsed a final time with acetone, and allowed
to air dry. All glassware openings where contamination can occur should be
covered until the sampling train is assembled, prior to sampling.
5-1.2 Preliminary Determinations. Same as Method 5. Section 4.1.2.
5.1.3 Preparation of Sampling Train. Follow the same general procedures
given in Method 5» Section 4.1.3» except place 100 ml of the nitric
acid/hydrogen peroxide solution (Section 4.2.1) in the two HN03/H202 impingers
(normally the second and third impingers), place 100 ml of the acidic potassium
permanganate solution (Section 4.2.2) in the fourth and fifth impinger, and
transfer approximately 200 to 300 g of preweighed silica gel from its container
to the last impinger. Alternatively, the silica gel may be weighed directly in
the impinger just prior to train assembly.
Several options are available to the tester based on the sampling
conditions. The use of an empty first impinger can be eliminated if the
moisture to be collected in the impingers is calculated or determined to be
less than 150 ml. The tester shall include two impingers containing the
acidic potassium permanganate solution for the first test run, unless past
testing experience at the same or similar sources has shown that only one is
necessary. The last permanganate impinger may be discarded if both
permanganate impingers have retained their original deep purple permanganate
color. A maximum of 200 ml in each permanganate impinger (and a maximum of
three permanganate impingers) may be used, if necessary, to maintain the
desired color in the last permanganate impinger.
Retain for reagent blanks, 100 ml of the nitric acid/hydrogen peroxide
solution and 100 ml of the acidic potassium permanganate solution. These
solutions should be labeled and treated as described in Section 7• Set up the
sampling train as shown in Figure A-l. If necessary to ensure leak-free
sampling train connections. Teflon tape should be used instead of silicone
grease to prevent contamination.
B-15
-------
Precaution: Extreme care should be taken to prevent contamination within
the train. Prevent the mercury collection reagent (acidic potassium
permanganate) from contacting any glassware of the train which is washed and
analyzed for Mn. Prevent hydrogen peroxide from mixing with the acidic
potassium permanganate.
5.1.4 Leak-Check Procedures. Follow the leak-check procedures given in
Method 5. Section 4.1.4.1 (Pretest Leak-Check), Section 4.1.4.2 (Leak-Checks
During the Sample Run), and Section 4.1.4.3 (Post-Test Leak-Checks).
5.1.5 Sampling Train Operation. Follow the procedures given in Method 5.
Section 4.1.5* For each run, record the data required on a data sheet such as
the one shown in Figure 5~2 of Method 5«
5.1.6 Calculation of Percent Isokinetic. Same as Method 5# Section 4.1.6.
5.2 Sample Recovery. Begin cleanup procedures as soon as the probe is
removed from the stack at the end of a sampling period.
The probe should be allowed to cool prior to sample recovery. When it can
be safely handled, wipe off all external particulate matter near the tip of
the probe nozzle and place a rinsed, non-contaminating cap over the probe
nozzle to prevent losing or gaining particulate matter. Do not cap the probe
tip tightly while the sampling train is cooling. This normally causes a vacuum
to form in the filter holder, thus causing the undesired result of drawing
liquid from the impingers into the filter.
Before moving the sampling train to the cleanup site, remove the probe from
the sampling 'train and cap the open outlet. Be careful not to lose any
condensate that might be present. Cap the filter inlet where the probe was
fastened. Remove the umbilical cord from the last impinger and cap the
impinger. Cap off the filter holder outlet and impinger inlet. Use non-
contaminating caps, whether ground-glass stoppers, plastic caps, serum caps,
or Teflon tape to close these openings.
Alternatively, the train can be disassembled before the probe and filter
holder/oven are completely cooled, if this procedure is followed: Initially
disconnect the filter holder outlet/impinger inlet and loosely cap the open
ends. Then disconnect the probe from the filter holder or cyclone inlet and
loosely cap the open ends. Cap the probe tip and remove the umbilical cord as
previously described.
Transfer the probe and filter-impinger assembly to a cleanup area that is
clean and protected from the wind and other potential causes of contamination
B-16
-------
or loss of sample. Inspect the train before and during disassembly and note
any abnormal conditions. The sample is recovered and treated as follows (see
schematic in Figure A-2). Assure that all items necessary for recovery of the
sample do not contaminate it.
5.2.1 Container No. 1 (Filter). Carefully remove the filter from the
filter holder and place it in its identified petri dish container. Acid-
washed polypropylene or Teflon coated tweezers or clean, disposable surgical
gloves rinsed with water should be used to handle the filters. If it is
necessary to fold the filter, make certain the particulate cake is inside the
fold. Carefully transfer the filter and any particulate matter or filter
fibers that adhere to the filter holder gasket to the petri dish by using a dry
(acid-cleaned) nylon'bristle brush. Do not use any metal-containing materials
when recovering this train. Seal the labeled petri dish.
5.2.2 Container No. 2 (Acetone Rinse). Taking care to see that dust on
the outside of the probe or other exterior surfaces does not get into the
sample, quantitatively recover particulate natter and any condensate from the
probe nozzle, probe fitting, probe liner, and front half of the filter holder
by washing these components with 100 ml of acetone and placing the wash in a
glass container. Note: The use of exactly 100 ml is necessary for the
subsequent blank correction procedures. Distilled water may be used instead of
acetone when approved by the Administrator and shall be used when specified by
the Administrator; in these cases, save a water blank and follow the
Administrator's directions on analysis. Perform the acetone rinses as follows:
Carefully remove the probe nozzle and clean the inside surface by rinsing with
acetone from a wash bottle and brushing with a nonmetallic brush. Brush until
the acetone rinse shows no visible particles, after which make a final rinse of
the inside surface with acetone.
Brush and rinse the inside parts of the Swagelok fitting with acetone in a
similar way until no visible particles remain.
Rinse the probe liner with acetone by tilting and rotating the probe while
squirting acetone into its upper end so that all inside surfaces will be wetted
with acetone. Allow the acetone to drain from the lower end into the sample
container. A funnel may be used to aid in transferring liquid washings to the
container. Follow the acetone rinse with a nonmetallic probe brush. Hold the
probe in an inclined position, squirt acetone into the upper end as the probe
brush is being pushed with a twisting action through the probe; hold a sample
B-17
-------
w
t
I—*
00
Probe Liner
and fozzle
Rinse with
acetone
Brush ilner
with non-
netalllc brush
and rinse
with acetone
Check liner
to see if
particulate
removed; if
not repeat
step above
Rinse three
tines with
0.1 N
nitric acid
Pront Half of
Filter Housing
Brush with
nonaetallic
brush and
rinse with
acetone
Rinse three
times with
0.1 N
nitric acid
FH
(3)*
Filter
Carefully
remove filter
from support
with Teflon-
coated tweezers
and place in
petri dish
Brush loose
particulate
onto filter
Seal petri
dish with
tape
AR
(2)
Filter Support
and Back Half
of Filter
Housing
Rinse three
times with
0.1 N
nitric acid
1st Impinger
(Empty at
beginning of
test)
Measure
Impinger
contents
Empty
contents
into
container
Rinse three
times with
0.1 N
nitric acid
2nd & 3rd
Impingere
(HNOyHjOj)
Measure
impinger
contents
Empty
contents
into
container
Rinse three
times with
0.1 N
nitric acid
4th & 5th
Ifflpingers
(Acidified
KMnOjj)
Measure
impinger
contents
Empty
contents
into
container
Rinse three
times with
permanganate
reagent
Remove any
residue with
8 N HC1 sol*n
Last Impinger
Weigh for
moisture
Discard
F
(1)
BH
CO
KMnO,,
(5)
SG
(6)
* Number in parantheses indicates container number.
Figure A-2. Sample recovery scheme.
-------
container underneath the lower end of the probe, and catch any acetone and
particulate matter which is brushed through the probe three times or more until
no visible particulate matter is carried out with the acetone or until none
remains in the probe liner on visual inspection. Rinse the brush with acetone,
and quantitatively collect these washings in the sample container. After the
brushing, make a final acetone rinse of the probe as described above.
It is recommended that two people clean the probe to minimize sample
losses. Between sampling runs, keep brushes clean and protected from
contamination.
Clean the inside of the front half of the filter holder by rubbing the
surfaces with a nonmetallic nylon bristle brush and rinsing with acetone.
Rinse each surface three times or more if needed to remove visible particulate.
Make a final rinse of the brush and filter holder. After all acetone washings
and particulate matter have been collected in the sample container, tighten the
lid on the sample container so that acetone will not leak out when it is
shipped to the laboratory. Mark the height of the fluid level to determine
whether or not leakage occurred during transport. Label the container clearly
to identify its contents.
5.2.3 Container No. 3 (Probe Rinse). Rinse the probe liner, probe nozzle,
and front half of the filter holder thoroughly with 100 ml of 0.1 N nitric acid
and place the wash into a sample storage container. Note: The use of exactly
100 ml is necessary for the subsequent blank correction procedures. Perform
the rinses as described in Method 12, Section 5-2.2. Record the volume of the
combined rinse. Mark the height of the fluid level on the outside of the
storage container and use this mark to determine if leakage occurs during
transport. Seal the container and clearly label the contents. Finally, rinse
the nozzle, probe liner, and front half of the filter holder with water
followed by acetone and discard these rinses.
5.2.4 Container No. 4 (Impingers 1 through 3. Contents and Rinses). Due
to the large quantity of liquid involved, the tester may place the impinger
solutions in more than one container. Measure the liquid in the first three
impingers volumetrically to within 0.5 ml using a graduated cylinder. Record
the volume of liquid present. This information is required to calculate the
moisture content of the sampled flue gas. Clean each of the first three
impingers, the filter support, the back half of the filter housing, and
connecting glassware by thoroughly rinsing with 100 ml of 0.1 N nitric acid as
B-19
-------
described in Method 12, Section 5*2.4. Note: The use of exactly 100 ml of 0.1
N nitric acid rinse is necessary for the subsequent blank correction
procedures. Combine the rinses and impinger solutions, measure and record the
volume. Calculate the 0.1 N nitric acid rinse volume by difference. Mark the
height of the fluid level on the outside of the container to determine if
leakage occurs during transport. Seal the container and clearly label the
contents.
5.2.5 Container No. 5 (Acidified Potassium Permanganate Solution and
Rinses, Impingers No. 4 & 5)* Pour all the liquid from the permanganate
impingers (fourth and fifth, if two permanganate impingers are used) into a
graduated cylinder and measure the volume to within 0.5 ml. This information
is required to calculate the moisture content of the sampled flue gas. Using
100 ml total of the acidified potassium permanganate solution, rinse the
permanganate impinger(s) and connecting glass pieces a minimum of three times.
Combine the rinses with the permanganate impinger solution. Finally, rinse the
permanganate impinger(s) and connecting glassware with 50 ml of 8 N HC1 to
remove any residue. Note: The use of exactly 100 ml and 50 ml for the two
rinses is necessary for the subsequent blank correction procedures. Place the
combined rinses and impinger contents in a labeled glass storage bottle. Mark
the height of the fluid level on the outside of the bottle to determine if
leakage occurs during transport. See the following note and the Precaution in
Paragraph 4.2.2 and properly seal the bottle and clearly label the contents.
Note: Due to the potential reaction of the potassium permanganate with the
acid, there may be pressure buildup in the sample storage bottles. These
bottles should not be filled full and should^be vented to relieve excess
pressure. Venting is highly recommended. A No. 70-72 hole drilled in the
container cap and Teflon liner has been found to allow adequate venting without
loss of sample.
5-2.6 Container No. 6 (Silica Gel). Note the color of the indicating
silica gel to determine whether it has been completely spent and make a
notation of its condition. Transfer the silica gel from its impinger to its
original container and seal. The tester may use a funnel to pour the silica
gel and a rubber policeman to remove the silica gel from the impinger. The
small amount of particles that may adhere to the impinger wall need not be
removed. Do not use water or other liquids to transfer the silica gel since
weight gained in the silica gel impinger is used for moisture calculations.
B-20
-------
Alternatively, if a balance is available in the field, record the weight of
the spent silica gel (or silica gel plus impinger) to the nearest 0.5 S»
5.2.7 Container No. 7 (Acetone Blank). Once during each field test, place
100 ml of the acetone used in the sample recovery process into a labeled
container for use in the front half field reagent blank. Seal the container.
5.2.8 Container No. 8 (0.1 N Nitric Acid Blank). Once during each field
test, place 200 ml of the 0.1 N nitric acid solution used in the sample
recovery process into a labeled container for use in the front half and back
half field reagent blanks. Seal the container.
5.2.9 Container No. 9 {5% Nitric Acid/lOX Hydrogen Peroxide Blank). Once
during each field test, place 200 ml of the 5% nitric acid/10j! hydrogen
peroxide solution used as the nitric acid impinger reagent into a labeled
container for use in the back half field reagent blank. Seal the container.
5*2.10 Container No. 10 (Acidified Potassium Permanganate Blank). Once
during each field test, place 300 ml of the acidified potassium permanganate
solution used as the impinger solution and in the sample recovery process into
a labeled container for use in the back half field reagent blank for mercury
analysis. Seal the container.
Note: This container should be vented, as described in Section 5-2.4, to
relieve excess pressure.
5.2.11 Container No. 11 (8 N HC1 Blank). Once during each field test,
place 50 ml of the 8 N hydrochloric acid used to rinse the acidified potassium
permanganate impingers into a labeled container for use in the back half
reagent blank for mercury.
5.2.12 Container No. 12 (Filter Blank). Once during each field test,
place an unused filter from the same lot as the sampling filters in a labeled
petri dish. Seal the petri dish. This will be used in the front half field
reagent blank.
5-3 Sample Preparation. Note the level of the liquid in each of the
containers and determine if any sample was lost during shipment. If a
noticeable amount of leakage has occurred, either void the sample or use
methods, subject to the approval of the Administrator, to correct the final
results. A diagram illustrating sample preparation and analysis procedures for
each of the sample train components is shown in Figure A-3.
5.3.I Container No. 1 (Filter). If particulatre emissions are being
determined, then desiccate the filter and filter catch without heat and weigh to
B-21
-------
Container 3
Acid Probe Rinse
(Labeled FH)
Acidify to pH 2
with conc. HNO-
to
i
K)
N)
Reduce volume to
near dryness and
digest with HP and
conc. HNO,
Container 2
Acetone Probe Rinse
(Labeled AR)
Reduce to dryness
in a tared beaker
Determine residue
weight in beaker
Solublllze residue
with conc. HNO,
Container 1
Filter
(Labeled P)
Desicci
constan
kte to
t weight
1
Determlt
particult
le filter
ite weight
Divide into 0.5 £
sections and digest
each section with
conc. HP and HN0o
Container 4
HN0^/H202 lapingers
(Labeled BH)
(include condensate
iraplnger, if used)
Aliquot taken
taken for CVAAS
for Hg analysis
Praction 2B
Digest with acid
and permanganate
•t 95°C for 2 h
and analyze
for Hg by CVAAS
Acidify
remaining
sample to pH
of 2 with
conc. UNO-,
Praction 2A
T
Reduce volume
to near
dryness and
digest with
HNO- and
"2°2
T
Analyze by
ICAP for 15
target metals
Analyze by
GPAAS for
metals
Container 5
Permanganate Impinger6
(Labeled KMnO^)
Digest with acid
and permanganate
at 95°C for 2 h
and analyze
for Hg by CVAAS
Fraction 3
Pllter and dilute
to known volume
Fraction 1
Analyze by ICAP for
target metals
Praction 1A
I
J_
Analyze for
aetals by GPAAS*
Praction 1A
Remove 50 to 100 ml
aliquot for Hg
analysis by CVAAS
Praction IB
Digest with acid and
permanganate at 95°C In
a water bath for 2 h
Analyze aliquot for
Hg using CVAAS
^Analysis by AAS for metals found at less than 2 ug/ml in digestate solution, if desired. Or analyze for each metal by AAS, if desired.
Figure A-3. Sample preparation and analysis scheme.
-------
a constant weight as described in Section 4.3 of Method 5* For analysis of
metals, divide the filter with its filter catch into portions containing
approximately 0.5 S each and place into the analyst's choice of either
individual microwave pressure relief vessels or Parr1* Bombs. Add 6 ml of
concentrated nitric acid and 4 ml of concentrated hydrofluoric acid to each
vessel. For microwave heating, microwave the sample vessels for approximately
12-15 minutes in intervals of 1 to 2 minutes at 600 Watts. For conventional
heating, heat the Parr Bombs at l40°C (285° F) for 6 hours. Then cool the
samples to room temperature and combine with the acid digested probe rinse as
required in Section 5>3-3. below.
Notes: 1. Suggested microwave heating times are approximate and are dependent
upon the number of samples being digested. Twelve to 15 minute
heating times have been found to be acceptable for simultaneous
digestion of up to 12 individual samples. Sufficient heating is
evidenced by sorbent reflux within the vessel.
2. If the sampling train uses an optional cyclone, the cyclone catch
should be prepared and digested using the same procedures described
for the filters and combined with the digested filter samples.
5.3.2 Container No. 2 (Acetone Rinse). Note the level of liquid in the
container and confirm on the analysis sheet whether or not leakage occurred
during transport. If a noticeable amount of leakage has occurred, either void
the sample or use methods, subject to the approval of the Administrator, to
correct the final results. Measure the liquid in this container either
volumetrically to +1 ml or gravimetrically to +0.5 g. Transfer the contents to
an acid-cleaned tared 250-ml beaker and evaporate to dryness at ambient
temperature and pressure. If particulate emissions are being determined,
desiccate for 24 hours without heat, weigh to a constant weight according to
the procedures described in Section 4.3 of Method 5» and report the results to
the nearest 0.1 mg. Resolubilize the residue with concentrated nitric acid and
combine the resultant sample including all liquid and any particulate matter
with Container No. 3 prior to beginning the following Section 5-3-3•
5.3.3 Container No. 3 (Probe Rinse). The pH of this sample shall be 2 or
lower. If the pH is higher, the sample should be acidified with concentrated
nitric acid to pH 2. The sample should be rinsed into a beaker with water and
the beaker should be covered with a ribbed watchglass. The sample volume should
be reduced to approximately 50 ml by heating on a hot plate at a temperature
B-23
-------
just below boiling. Inspect the sample for visible particulate matter, and
depending on the results of the inspection, perform one of the following. If no
particulate matter is observed, combine the sample directly with the acid
digested portions of the filter prepared previously in Section 5•3~1• If
particulate matter is observed, digest the sample in microwave vessels or ParrR
Bombs following the procedures described in Section 5«3«1; then combine the
resultant sample directly with the acid digested portions of the filter prepared
previously in Section 5.3.1. The resultant combined sample is referred to as
Fraction 1. Filter the combined solution of the acid digested filter and probe
rinse samples using Whatman 5*H filter paper. Dilute to 300 ml (or the
appropriate volume for the expected metals concentration) with water. Measure
and record the combined volume of the Fraction 1 solution to within 0.1 ml.
Quantitatively remove a 50 ml aliquot and label as Fraction IB. Label the
remaining 250 ml portion as Fraction 1A. Fraction 1A is used for ICAP or AAS
analysis. Fraction IB is used for the determination of front half mercury.
5.3*^ Container No. 4 (Impingers 1-3)• Measure and record the total vol-
ume of this sample (Fraction 2) to within 0.5 nl. Remove a 50 ml aliquot for
mercury analysis and label as Fraction 2B. Label the remaining portion of
Container No. 4 as Fraction 2A. The Fraction 2B aliquot should be prepared and
analyzed as described in Section 5.4.3. Fraction 2A shall be pH 2 or lower.
If necessary, use concentrated nitric acid to lower Fraction 2A to pH 2. The
sample should be rinsed into a beaker with water and the beaker should be
covered with a ribbed watchglass. The sample volume should be reduced to
approximately 20 ml by heating on a hot plate at a temperature just below
boiling. Then follow either of the digestion procedures described in Sections
5.3.^.1 and 5.3.4.2, below.
5.3.4.1 Conventional Digestion Procedure. Add 30 ml of 50 percent nitric
acid and heat for 30 minutes on a hot plate to Just below boiling. Add 10 ml of
3 percent hydrogen peroxide and heat for 10 more minutes. Add 50 ml of hot
water and heat the sample for an additional 20 minutes. Cool, filter the
sample, and dilute to 150 ml (or the appropriate volume for the expected metals
concentrations) wi th water.
5.3.^.2 Microwave Digestion Procedure. Add 10 ml of 50 percent nitric
acid and heat for 6 minutes in intervals of 1 to 2 minutes at 600 Watts. Allow
the sample to cool. Add 10 ml of 3 percent hydrogen peroxide and heat for 2
more minutes. Add 50 ml of hot water and heat for an additional 5 minutes.
B-24
-------
Cool, filter the sample, and dilute to 150 ml (or the appropriate volume for the
expected metals concentrations) with water.
Note: All microwave heating times given are approximate and are dependent
upon the number of samples being digested at a time. Heating times as given
above have been found acceptable for simultaneous digestion of up to 12
individual samples. Sufficient heating is evidenced by solvent reflux within
the vessel.
5.3.5 Container No. 5 (Impingers 4 & 5)- Measure and record the total
volume of this sample to within 0.5 ml. This sample is referred to as Fraction
3. Follow the analysis procedures described in Section 5*4.3.
5.3'6 Container No. 6 (Silica Gel). Weigh the spent silica gel (or silica
gel plus impinger) to the nearest 0.5 g using a balance. (This step
may be conducted in the field.)
5.4 Sample Analysis. For each sampling train, five individual samples are
generated for analysis. A schematic identifying each sample and the prescribed
sample preparation and analysis scheme is shown in Figure A-3. The first two
samples, labeled Fractions 1A and IB, consist of the digested samples from the
front half of the train. Fraction 1A is for ICAP or AAS analysis as described
in Sections 5.4.1 and/or 5.4.2. Fraction IB is for determination of front half
mercury as described in Section 5.4.3.
The back half of the train was used to prepare the third through fifth
samples. The third and fourth samples, labeled Fractions 2A and 2B, contain
the digested samples from the H20 and HN03/H202 Impingers 1 through 3- Fraction
2A is for ICAP or AAS analysis. Fraction 2B will be analyzed for mercury.
The fifth sample, labeled Fraction 3t consists of the impinger contents and
rinses from the permanganate Impingers 4 and 5* This sample is analyzed for
mercury as described in Section 5.4.3. The total back half mercury catch is
determined from the sum of Fraction 2B and Fraction 3.
5-4.1 ICAP Analysis. Fraction 1A and Fraction 2A are analyzed by ICAP
using EPA Method 200.7 (40 CFR 136. Appendix C). Calibrate the ICAP, and set up
an analysis program as described in Method 200.7. The quality control proce-
dures described in Section 7•3*1 of this method shall be followed. Recommended
wavelengths for use in the analysis are listed below.
B-25
-------
Element
Wavelength (nm)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
308.215
206.833
193.696
455.403
313.042
226.502
267.716
324.754
259.9t0
220.353
257.610
231.604
196.026
328.068
190.864
213.856
The wavelengths listed are recommended because of their sensitivity and overall
acceptance. Other wavelengths may be substituted if they can provide the
needed sensitivity and are treated with the same corrective techniques for
spectral interference.
Initially, analyze all samples for the target metals plus iron and
aluminum. If iron and aluminum are present in the sample, the sample may have
to be diluted so that each of these elements is at a concentration of less than
50 ppm to reduce their spectral interferences on arsenic and lead.
Note: When analyzing samples in a hydrofluoric acid matrix, an alumina
torch should be used; since all front half samples will contain hydrofluoric
acid, use an alumina torch.
5.4.2 AAS by Direct Aspiration and/or Graphite Furnace. If analysis of
metals in Fraction 1A and Fraction 2A using graphfte furnace or direct
aspiration AAS is desired. Table A-2 should be used to determine which
techniques and methods should be applied for each target metal. Table A-2
should also be consulted to determine possible interferences and techniques to
be followed for their minimization. Calibrate the instrument according to
Section 6.3 and follow the quality control procedures specified in Section
5.4.3 Cold Vapor AAS Mercury Analysis. Fraction IB, Fraction 2B, and
Fraction 3 should be analyzed for mercury using cold vapor atomic absorption
spectroscopy following the method outlined in EPA Method 7^70 or in Standard
Methods for Water and Wastewater Analysis, 15th Edition, Method 303F. Set up
7.3.2.
B-26
-------
TABLE A-2. APPLICABLE TECHNIQUES, METHODS, AND MINIMIZATION OF INTEFERENCE FOR AAS ANALYSIS
Metal
Technique
Method
No.
Wavelength
(nm)
Interf e
Cause
cence
Minimization
Sb
Aspiration
7040
217.6
1000 mg/ral Pb
Ni, Cu, or acid
Use secondary wavelenght of 231.1 nm.
Match sample & standards acid concentration
or use nitrous oxide/acetylene flame
Sb
Furnace
7041
217.6
High Pb
Secondary wavelength or Zeeman correction
As
Furnace
7060
193.7
Arsenic volati -
zation
Aluminium
Spiked samples & add nickel nitrate solution
to digestates prior to analyses
Use Zeeman background correction
Ba
Aspiration
7080
553-6
Calcium
Barium ionization
High hollow cathode current & narrow band set
2 mL of KC1 per 100 mL of sample
Be
Aspiration
7090
234.9
500 ppm A1
High Mg 4 Si
Add 0.1% n^'ride
Use method of standard additions
Be
Furnace
7091
234.9
Be in optical path
Optimize parameters to miminize effects
Cd
Aspiration
7130
228.8
Absorption & light
scattering
Background correction is required
Cd
Furnace
7131
228.8
As above
Excess chloride
Pipet tips
As above
Ammonium phosphate used as a matrix modifier
Use cadmium-free tips
Cr
Aspiration
7190
357-9
Alkali metal
Absorption & scatt
KC1 ionization suppressant in sample & stand
Consult manufacturer's literature
Cr
Furnace
7191
357-9
200 mg/L calcium
& phosphate
All calcium nitrate for a know constant effect
and to eliminate effect of phosphate
(continued)
-------
TABLE A-2 (CONTINUED)
Metal
Technique
Method
No.
Wavelength
(nm)
Interf erence
Cause
Minimization
Cu
Fe
Pb
Pb
Mn
Ni
Se
Ag
T1
T1
Zn
Aspiration
Aspiration
Aspiration
Furnace
Aspiration
Aspiration
Furnace
Aspiration
Aspiration
Furnace
Aspiration
7210
7380
7420
7421
7460
7520
7740
7760
7840
7841
7950
324.7
248.3
283-3
283.3
279-5
232.0
196.0
328.1
276.8
276.8
213.9
Absorpt & scatter
Contamination
217.0 nm alternat
Poor recoveries
403.1 nm alternat
352.4 nm alternat
Fe, Co, & Cr
Nonlinear respons
Volitality
Adsorpt & scatter
Absorpt & scatter
AgCl insoluble
Viscosity
Hydrochloric acid
or chloride
High Si, Cu & P
Contamination
Consult manufacturer's manual
Great care taken to aviod contamination
Background correction required
Matrix modifier, add 10 uL of phosphorus acid
to 1-mL of prepared sample in sampler cup
Background correction required
Background correction required
Matrix matching or a nitrous-oxide/acety flame
Sample dilution or use 352.4 nm line
Spike samples & reference materials & add nickel
nitrate to minimize volatilization
Background correction is required & Zeeman
background correction can be useful
Background correction is required
Avoid hydrochloric acid unless silver is in
solution as a chloride complex
Sample & standards monitored for apiration rate
Background correction is required
Hydrochloric acid should not be used
Background correction is required
Verify that losses are not occuring for
volitization by spiked samples or standad addt
Palladium is a suitable matrix modifier
Strontium removes Cu and phosphate
Care should be taken to avid contamination
-------
the calibration curve as described in Section 7*3 of Method 303P» Add
approximately 5 ml of each sample to BOD bottles. Record the amount of sample
added. The amount used is dependent upon the expected levels of mercury.
Dilute to approximately 120 ml with mercury-free water. Add approximately 15
ml of 5 percent potassium permanganate solution to the Fraction 23 and Fraction
3 samples. Add 5 percent potassium permanganate solution to the Fraction IB
sample as needed to produce a purple solution lasting at least 15 minutes. A
minimum of 25 ml is suggested. Add 5 ml of 50 percent nitric acid, 5 of
concentrated sulfuric acid, and 9 nl of 5 percent potassium persulfate to each
sample and each standard. Digest the solution in the capped BOD bottle at 95°C
(205°F) in a convection oven or water bath for 2 hours. Cool. Add 5 nl of
hydroxylamine hydrochloride solution and mix the sample. Then add 7 ml of
stannous chloride to each sample and analyze immediately.
6. Calibration
Maintain a laboratory log of all calibrations.
6.1 Sampling Train Calibration. Calibrate the sampling train components
according to the indicated sections of Method 5* Probe Nozzle (Section 5*1)»
Pitot Tube (Section 5.2); Metering System (Section 5*3); Probe Heater (Section
5.A); Temperature Gauges (Section 5*5)J Leak-Check of the Metering System
(Section 5*6); and Barometer (Section 5*7).
6.2 Inductively Coupled Argon Plasma Spectrometer Calibration. Prepare
standards as outlined in Section 4.4. Profile and calibrate the instrument
according to the instrument manufacturer's recommended procedures using the
above standards. The instrument calibration should be checked once per hour.
If the instrument does not reproduce the concentrations of the standard within
10 percent, the complete calibration procedures should be performed.
6.3 Atomic Absorption Spectrometer - Direct Aspiration, Graphite Furnace
and Cold Vapor Mercury Analyses. Prepare the standards as outlined in Section
4.4. Calibrate the spectrometer using these prepared standards. Calibration
procedures are also outlined in the EPA methods referred to in Table A-2 and in
Standard Methods for Water and Wastewater, 15th Edition, Method 303P (for
mercury). Each standard curve should be run in duplicate and the mean values
used to calculate the calibration line. The instrument should be recalibrated
approximately once every 10 to 12 samples.
B-29
-------
7. Quality Control
7.1 Sampling. Field Reagent Blanks. The blank samples in Container
Numbers 7 through 12 produced previously in Sections 5-2.7 through 5.2.11,
respectively, shall be processed, digested, and analyzed as follows. Digest
and process Container No. 12 contents per Section 5*3-1. Container No. 7 per
Section 5.3.2, and half of Container No. 8 per Section 5•3•3• This produces
Fraction Blank 1A and Fraction Blank IB from Fraction Blank 1. Combine the
remaining half of Container No. 8 with the contents of Container No. 9 and
digest and process the resultant volume per Section 5»3-^» This produces
Fraction Blank 2A and Fraction Blank 2B from Fraction Blank 2. Container No. 10
and Container No. 11 contents are Fraction Blank 3* Analyze Fraction Blank 1A
and Fraction Blank 2A per Section 5.^*1 and/or 5-^*2. Analyze Fraction Blank
IB, Fraction Blank 2B, and Fraction Blank 3 per Section 5.^*3* The analysis of
Fraction Blank 1A produces the front half reagent blank correction values for
the metals except mercury; the analysis of Fraction Blank IB produces the front
half reagent blank correct value for mercury. The analysis of Fraction Blank 2A
produces the back half reagent blank correction values for the metals except
mercury, while separate analysis of Fraction Blanks 2B and 3 produce the back
half reagent blank correction value for mercury.
7.2 An attempt may be mace to determine if the laboratory reagents used in
Section 5*3 caused contamination. They should be analyzed by the procedures in
Section 5-4. The Administrator will determine whether or not the laboratory
blank reagent values can be used in the calculation of the stationary source
test results.
7-3 Quality Control Samples. The following quality control samples should
be analyzed.
7.3.1 ICAP Analysis. Follow the quality control shown in Section 8 of
Method 6010. For the purposes of a three run test series, these requirements
have been modified to include the following: two instrument check standard
runs, two calibration blank runs, one interference check sample at the
beginning of the analysis (must be within 25% or analyze by standard addition),
one quality control sample to check the accuracy of the calibration standards
(must be within 25X of calibration), and one duplicate analysis (must be within
5# of average or repeat all analysis).
7.3»2 Direct Aspiration and/or Graphite Furnace AAS Analysis for Antimony,
Arsenic, Barium, Beryllium, Cadmium, Copper, Chromium, Lead, Nickel, Manganese,
B-30
¦>
-------
Mercury, Phosphorus, Selenium, Silver, Thallium, and Zinc. All samples should
be analyzed in duplicate. Perform a matrix spike on one front half sample and
one back half sample or one combined sample. If recoveries of less than 75
percent or greater than 125 percent are obtained for the matrix spike, analyze
each sample by the method of additions. A quality control sample should be
analyzed to check the accuracy of the calibration standards. The results must
be within 10# or the calibration repeated.
7.3.3 Cold Vapor AAS Analysis for Mercury. All samples should be analyzed
in duplicate. A quality control sample should be analyzed to check the accuracy
of the calibration standards (within 10% or repeat calibration). Perform a
matrix spike on one sample from the nitric impinger portion (must be within 25%
or samples must be analyzed by the method of standard additions). Additional
information on quality control can be obtained from EPA Method 7^70 or in
Standard Methods for Water and Wastewater, 15th Edition, Method 303^-
8c Calculations
8.1 Dry Gas Volume. Using the data from this test, calculate VB(std) , the
dry gas sample volume at standard conditions as outlined in Section 6.3 of
Method 5*
8.2 Volume of Water Vapor and Moisture Content. Using the data obtained
from this test, calculate the volume of water vapor Vw(gtdJ and the moisture
content Bw# of the stack gas. Use Equations 5~2 and 5~3 Method 5.
8.3 Stack Gas Velocity. Using the data from this test and Equation 2-9 of
Method 2, calculate the average stack gas velocity.
8.4 Metals (Except Mercury) in Source Sample.
8.4.1 Fraction 1A, Front Half, Metals (except Hg). Calculate the amount
of each metal collected in Fraction 1 of the sampling train using the following
equation:
«fh = C. F< V.#lBfl Eq. 1*
#If Fractions 1A and 2A are combined, proportional aliquots must be used.
Appropriate changes must be made in Equations 1-3 to reflect this approach.
B-31
-------
where:
Mfh = total mass of each metal {except Hg) collected in the
front half of the sampling train (Fraction 1), ug.
= concentration of metal in sample Fraction 1A as read from the
standard curve (ug/ml).
Fd = dilution factor (Fd * the inverse of the fractional portion of the
concentrated sample in the solution actually used in the instrument to
produce the reading Ca . For example, when the dilution of Fraction 1A
is from 2 to 10 ml, Fd =5)*
V«0in i 3 total volume of digested sample solution (Fraction 1), ml.
8.4.2 Fraction 2A, Back Half, Metals (except Hg). Calculate the amount of
each metal collected in Fraction 2 of the sampling train using the following
equation.
F. V. Eq. 2«
where:
Mbh = total mass of each metal (except Hg) collected in the back half
of the sampling train (Fraction 2), ug.
Ca ¦ concentration of metal in sample Fraction 2A, as read from the
standard curve (ug/ml).
Fa ® aliquot factor, volume of Fraction 2 divided by volume of aliquot
Fraction 2A.
Va » volume of digested sample analyzed (concentrated Fraction 2A), ml.
8.4.3 Total Train, Metals (except Hg). Calculate the total amount of each
of the quantified metals collected in the sampling train as follows:
= (Mfh * «fhb) +
-------
Note: If the measured blank value for the front half (mfhb) is in the range 0.0
to A ug [where A ug equals the value determined by multiplying 1.4 ug per square
inch (1.4 ug/in.2) times the actual area in square inches (in.2) of the filter
used in the emission sample], «nfhb may be used to correct the emission sample
value (mfh); if mfh> exceeds A ug, the greater of the two following values
(either I. or IX.) may be used:
I. A ug, or
II. the lesser of (a) mfhb, or (b) 5 percent of mfh.
If the measured blank value for the back half (mbhb) is in the range 0.0 to 1
ug, ^hhh may be used to correct the emission sample value (mbh); if ®bhb exceeds
1 ug, the greater of the two following values may be used: 1 ug or 5 percent of
mbh •
8.5 Mercury in Source Sample.
8.5.1 Fraction IB, Front Half, Hg. Calculate the amount of mercury
collected in the front half. Fraction 1, of the sampling train using the
following equation:
^fh
He,h = * V.oln.l E<*- *
IB
where:
Hgfh = total mass of mercury collected in the front half of the sampling
train (Fraction 1), ug.
Qfh = quantity of mercury in analyzed sample, ug.
V.oin 1 3 total volume of digested sample solution (Fraction 1), ml.
VflB = volume of Fraction 13 analyzed, ml. See the following Note.
Note: VP1B is the actual amount of Fraction IB analyzed. For example, if 1 ml
of Fraction IB were diluted to 100 ml to bring it into the proper analytical
range, and 1 ml of the 100 ml dilution was analyzed, VflB would be 0.01.
8.5*2 Fraction 2B and Fraction 3. Back Half, Hg. Calculate the amount of
mercury collected in Fractions 2 and 3 using Equations 5 and 6, respectively.
Calculate the total amount of mercury collected in the back half of the sampling
train using Equation 7.
®bh2
^8-b h 2 = X o 1 n , 2 Eq * 5
Vfl.
B-33
-------
where:
Hgbh2 = total mass of mercury collected in Fraction 2, ug.
Qbh2 = quantity of mercury in analyzed sample, ug.
Vf2B * volume of Fraction 2B analyzed, ml (see Note in
Section 8.5«1)•
V
8 o 1 n , 2
= total volume of Fraction 2, ml.
Eq. 6
x V,
i o 1 n , 3
V.
12B
where:
Hgbh3 » total mass of mercury collected in Fraction 3» ug.
Qbh3 = quantity of mercury in analyzed sample, ug.
Vf3 = volume of Fraction 3 analyzed, ml (see Note in
Section 8.5-1)•
Vioin 3 = total volume of Fraction 3. ml.
Hgbh = total mass of mercury collected in the back half of the sampling
train, ug.
8.5.3 Total Train Mercury Catch. Calculate the total amount of mercury
collected in the sampling train using Equation 8.
Mt ¦ total mass of mercury collected in the sampling train, ug.
Hgfhb = blank correction value for mass of mercury detected in front half
field reagent blank, ug.
Hgbhb = blank correction value for mass of mercury detected in back
half field reagent blank, ug.
Note: If the total of the measured blank values (Hgfhb ~ Hgbhb) is in the range
of 0 to 3 ug, then the total may be used to correct the emission sample value
(Hgfh + Hgbh); if it exceeds 3 ug, the greater of the following two values may
be used: 3 ug or 5 percent of the emission sample value (Hgfh + Hgbh).
^Kbh " ^bh2 + **gbh3
Eq. 7
where:
Mt = (Hgfh - HgfhJ ~ (Hgbh - Hgbhb)
Eq. 8
where:
B-34
-------
8.6 Metal Concentration of Stack Gas. Calculate the cadmium, total
chromium, arsenic, nickel, manganese, beryllium, copper, lead, phosphorus,
thallium, silver, barium, zinc, selenium, antimony, and mercury concentrations
in the stack gas (dry basis, adjusted to standard conditions) as follows:
C. ¦ K* (Mt/V.j.to) E
-------
DRAFT
MEIHOD Cr"*5 - DETERMINATION OF HEXAVALEOT CHROMIUM EMISSIONS
FROM STATIONARY SOURCES
EPA Contract No. 68-02-4442
Work Assignment Nos. 37, 43, 69, 76, 96
October 25, 1990
Prepared by:
Samuel C. McClintock
Entropy Environmentalists, Inc.
Research and Analysis Division
P.O. Box 12291
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
Prepared for:
Dr. Joseph E. Knoll
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance Division
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
B-36
-------
DRAFT - 10/25/90
MEfflOD Cr*6 - DETHWnffiTTCN OF HEXAVALD7T CHRCMILM EMISSIONS
EKM STKTTCNARy SOURCES
1. Applicability and Principle
1.1 Applicability, mis method applies to the determination of hexavalent
chromium (Cr4^) emissions from hazardous waste incinerators, municipal waste
combustors, and sewage sludge incinerators. With the approval of the
Administrator, this method may also be used to measure total chromium. The
sampling train, constructed of Teflon carponents, has only been evaluated at
temperatures less than 300°F. Trains constructed of other materials, for
testing at higher teirperatures, are currently being evaluated.
1.2 Principle. For incinerators and combustors, the Cr*6 emissions are
collected isokinetically from the source. To eliminate the possibility of Cr+^
reduction between the nozzle and impinger, the emission sanples are collected
with a recirculatory train where the impinger reagent is continuously
recirculated to the nozzle. Recovery procedures include a post-sampling purge
and filtration. The impinger train sanples are analyzed for Cr+6 by an ion
chromatograph equipped with a post-column reactor and a visible wavelength
detector. The IC/PCR separates the Cr4"6 as chranate (Cr04~) from other
components in the sample matrices that may interfere with the Cr"^-specific
diphenylcarbazide reaction that occurs in the post-column reactor. To increase
sensitivity for trace levels of chrcmium, a preconcentration system is also
used in conjunction with the IC/PCR.
2. Range, Sensitivity, Precision, and Interference
2.1 Range. Bnploying a preconcentration procedure, the lower limit of the
detection range can be extended to 16 nanograms per dry standard cubic meter
(ng/dsan) with a 3 dscm gas sample (0.1 ppb in solution). With sample
dilution, there is no upper limit.
2.2 Sensitivity. A minimum detection limit of 8 ng/dscm with a 3 dscm gas
sample can be achieved by preconcentration (0.05 ppb in solution).
2.3 Precision. The precision of the IC/PCR with sample preconcentration is
5 to 10 percent. The overall precision for sewage sludge incinerators emitting
120 ng/dscm of Cr1"6 and 3.5 ug/dsan of total chrcsniura is 25% and 9% for Cr"1"^
and total chromium, respectively; for hazardous waste incinerators emitting 300
ng/dscm of Cr-1-6 it is 20%.
2.4 Interference. Components in the sample matrix may cause Cr"*"6 to
convert to trivalent chromium (Cr+3) or cause Cr+3 to convert to Cr"1-6. A post-
sampling nitrogen purge and sample filtration are included to eliminate many of
these interferences. The chromatographic separation of Cr4"6 using ion
chromatography reduces the potential for other metals to interfere with the
B-37
-------
post-column reaction. For the IC/PCR analysis, only compounds that coelute
with Cr*6 and affect the diphenylcarbazide reaction will cause interference.
Periodic analysis of deionized (DI) water blanks is used to demonstrate that:
the analytical system is essentially free from contamination. Sample cross-
contamination that can occur when high-level and lew-level samples or standards
are analyzed alternately is eliminated ty thorough purging of the sample loop.
Purging can easily be obtained by increasing the injection volume of the
samples to ten times the size of the sairple loop.
3. Apparatus
3.1 Sampling Train. Schematics of the recirdilatory sampling trains
employed in this method are shewn in Figures Cr^-1 and Cr™-2. The
recirculatory train is readily assembled from commercially available
components. All portions of the train in contact with the sample are either
glass, quartz, Tygon, or Teflon, and are to be cleaned as per subsection
5.1.1.
The metering system is identical to that specified by Method 5 (see section
3.8.1); the sampling train consists of the following components:
3.1.1 Probe Nozzle. Glass or Teflon with a sharp, tapered leading edge.
The angle of taper shall be <30° and the taper shall be on the outside to
preserve a constant internal diameter. The probe nozzle shall be of the
button-hook or elbcw design, unless otherwise specified by the Administrator.
A range of nozzle sizes suitable for isokinetic sampling should be
available, e.g., 0.32 to 1.27 cm (1/8 to 1/2 in.) — or larger if higher volume
sample trains are used — inside diameter (ID) nozzles in increments of 0.16 cm
(1/16 in.). Each nozzle shall be calibrated, according to the procedures
outlined in Section 6.
3.1.2 Teflon Aspirator or Pump/Sprayer Assembly. Teflon aspirator capable
of recirculating absorbing reagent at 50 ml/min while operating at 0.75 cfm.
Alternatively, a pump/sprayer assembly may be used instead of the Teflon
aspirator. A Teflon union-T is connected behind the nozzle to provide the
absorbing reagent/sample gas mix; a peristaltic pump is used to recirculate the
absorbing reagent at a flwrate of at least 50 ml/min. Teflon fittings,
Teflon ferrules, and Teflon nuts are used to connect a glass or Teflon nozzle,
recirculation line, and sanple line to the Teflon aspirator or union-T. Tygon,
C-flex* or other suitable inert tubing for use with peristaltic pump.
3.1.3 Teflon Sairple Line. Teflon, 3/8" outside diameter (OD) and 1/4"
inside diameter (ID), or 1/2" OD x 3/8" ID, of suitable length to connect
aspirator (or T-union) to first Teflon impinger.
3.1.4 Teflon Recirculation Line. Teflon, 1/4" O.D. and 1/8" I.D., of
suitable length to connect first impinger to aspirator (or T-union).
*N0TE: Mention of trade names or specific product does not constitute
endorsement by the Enviornmental Protection Agency.
B-38
-------
GLASS
IMPINGER
W
I
OJ
vo
TEFLON IMPINGERS
\
TEFLON
LINES
ASPIRATOR
TO
METHOD 5-TYPE
METERBOX
NOZZLE
• RECIRCULATING
LIQUID
150 ml
0.1 N KOH
75 ml
0.1 N KOH
75 ml
0.1 N KOH
EMPTY *?***. SILICA
GEL
WATER AND ICE BATH
4215 7/90
Figure 0+6 -1. Schematic of recirculatory impinger train with aspirator assembly.
-------
NOZZLE
w
I
o
GLASS
IMPINGER
TEFLON
T-UNION
3
RECIRCULATING
LIQUID
TEFLON IMPINGERS
TEFLON
LINES
PERISTALTIC
PUMP
SILICA
GEL
150 ml
0.1 N KOH
75 ml
0.1 N KOH
EMPTY
75 ml
0.1 N KOH
WATER AND ICE BATH
TO
METHOD 5-TYPE
METERBOX
4215 7/90
Figure Cr+6
-2.
Schematic of recirculatory impinger train with pump/sprayer assembly.
-------
3.1.5 Teflon Inpingers. Four Teflon inpingers; Teflon tubes and fittings,
such as made by Savillex*, can be used to construct irnpingers 2" diameter by
12" long, with vacuum-tight 3/8" O.D. Teflon conpression fittings.
Alternatively, standard glass inpingers that have been Teflcn-lined, with
Teflon stems and U-tubes, may be used. Inlet fittings on impinger top to be
bored through to accept 3/8" O.D. tubing as inpinger stem. The second and
third 3/8" 00 Teflon stem has a 1/4" OD Teflon tube, 2" long, inserted at its
end to duplicate the effects of the Greenburg-Smith impinger stem. The first,
inpinger stem should extend to 2" from inpinger bottom, high enough in the
inpinger reagent to prevent air from entering recirculating line; the second
and third inpinger stems should extend to 1/2" fron inpinger bottom. The first
inpinger should include a 1/4" O.D. Teflon compression fitting for
recirculation line. The fourth inpinger serves as a knockout impinger.
3.1.6 Glass Inpinger. Silica gel inpinger. Vacuum-tight inpingers,
capable of containing 400 g. of silica gel, with compatible fittings. The
silica gel inpinger will have a modified stem (1/2" ID at tip of stem).
3.1.7 Thermometer, (identical to that specified by Method 5) at the outlet
of the silica gel inpinger, to monitor the exit temperature of the gas.
3.1.8 Metering System, Barometer, and Gas Density Determinations
Equipment. Same as Method 5, Section 2.1.8 through 2.1.10, respectively.
3.2 Sample Recovery. Clean all items for sample handling or storage with
10% nitric acid solution by soaking, where possible, and rinse thoroughly with
qI water before use.
3.2.1 Nitrogen Purge Line. Inert tubing and fittings capable of delivering
0 to 1 scf/rain (continuously adjustable) of nitrogen gas to the inpinger train
from a standard gas cylinder (See Figure Cr^-3). Standard 3/8-inch Teflon
tubing and compression fittings in conjunction with an adjustable pressure
regulator and needle valve may be used.
3.2.2 Wash Bottles. Two polyethylene wash bottles, for DI water and nitric
rinse solution.
3.2.3 Sample storage Containers. Polyethylene, with leak-free screw cap,
500-ml or 1000-ml.
3.2.4 1000-ml Graduated Cylinder and Balance.
3.2.5 Plastic Storage Containers. Air tight containers to store silica
gel.
3.2.6 Funnel and Rubber Policeman. To aid in transfer of silica gel frcm
inpinger to storage container; not necessary if silica gel is weighed directly
in the inpinger.
B-4i
o
-------
w
I
4^.
N)
GLASS
IMPINGER
FLOW
RATE
101pm
N2 GAS
OUTLET
TEFLON IMPINGERS
SILICA
GEL
150 ml
0.1 N KOH
75 ml
0.1 N KOH
EMPTY
75 ml
0.1 N KOH
WATER AND ICE BATH
NITROGEN
CYLINDER
GAS
RECIRCULATING
LINE
Fiaure Cr+6 -3. Schematic of post test nitrogen purge system.
4215 7/90
-------
3.3 Sample Preparation for Analysis. Sample preparation prior to analysis
includes purging the sample train immediately following the sample run, and
filtering the recovered sample to remove particulate matter immediately
following recovery.
3.3.1 Beakers, Funnels, Volumetric Flasks, Volumetric Pipets, and
Graduated cylinders. Assorted sizes, Teflon or glass, for preparation of
samples, sample dilution, and preparation of calibration standards. Prepare
initially following procedure. described in Section 5.1.3 and rinse between use
with 0.1 N HNO3 and DI water.
3.3.2 Filtration Apparatus. Teflon, or equivalent, for filtering samples,
and Teflon filter holder. Teflon impinger carrponents have been found to be
satisfactory as a sample reservoir for pressure filtration using nitrogen.
3.4 Analysis.
3.4.1 IC/PCR system. High performance liquid chromatograph punp, sample
injection valve, post-column reagent delivery and mixing system, and a visible
detector, capable of operating at 520 nm, all with a non-metallic (or inert)
flew path. An electronic recording integrator operating in the peak area mode
is recarcnended, but other recording devices and integration techniques are
acceptable provided the repeatability criteria and the linearity criteria for
the calibration curve described in Section 5.5 can be satisfied. A sample
loading system will be required if preconcentration is employed.
3.4.2 Analytical Column. A high performance ion chromatograph (HPIC) non-
metallic column with anion separation characteristics and a high loading
capacity designed for separation of metal chelating compounds to prevent metal
interference. Resolution described in Section 5.4 must be obtained. A non-
metallic guard column with the same ion-exchange material is recorrarended.
3.4.3 Preconcentration Column. An HPIC non-metallic column with
acceptable anion retention characteristics and sairple loading rates as
described in Section 5.5.
3.4.4 0.45 urn filter cartridge. For the removal of insoluble material. To
be used just prior to saitple injection/analysis.
4. Reagents
All reagents shcxild, at a minimum, conform to the specifications
established by the Cesnrnittee on Analytical Reagents of the American Chemical
Society, where such specifications are available. All prepared reagents should
be checked by IC/PCR analysis for Cr4^ to assure that contamination is below
the analytical detection limit for direct injection or, if selected,
preconcentration. If total chromium is also to be determined, the reagents
should also be checked by the analytical technique selected to assure that
contamination is belcw the analytical detection limit.
B-43
-------
4.1 Sampling.
4.1.1 Water. Deionized water. It is recommended that water blanks be
checked prior to preparing sampling reagents to ensure that the Cr+6 content
is less than the analytical detection limit.
4.1.2 Potassium Hydroxide, 0.1 N. Add 5.6 gm of KOH(s) to approximately
900 ml of DI water and let dissolve. Dilute to 1000 ml with DI water. NOTE:
At sources with high concentrations of acids and/or S02/ the concentration of
KOH should be increased to 0.5 N to insure that the pH of the solution is
above 8.5 after sampling.
4.1.3 Silica Gel and Crushed Ice. Same as Method 5, Sections 3.1.2 and
3.1.4, respectively.
4.2 Sample Recovery. Hie reagents used in sample recovery are as follows:
4.2.1 Water. Same as subsection 4.1.1.
4.2.2 Nitric Acid, 0.1 N. Add 6.3 ml of concentrated HNO3 (70 percent) to
a graduated cylinder containing approximately 900 ml of DI water. Dilute to
1000 ml with DI water, and mix well.
4.2.3 pH Indicator Strip. pH indicator capable of determining pH of
solution between the pH range of 7 and 12, at 0.5 pH intervals.
4.3 Sanple Preparation
4.3.1 Water. Same as subsection 4.1.1.
4.3.2 Nitric Acid, 0.1 N. Same as subsection 4.2.2.
4.3.3 Filters. Acetate membrane, or equivalent, filters with 0.45
micrometer or smaller pore size to remove insoluble material.
4.4 Analysis.
4.4.1 Oiranatographic Eluent. Hie eluent used in the analytical system is
anroonium sulfate based. It is prepared by adding 6.5 ml of 29% ammonium
hydroxide (NH^OH) and 33 grams of ammonium sulfate [ (NH^) 2^4 ] to 500 ml of DI
water. The mixture should then be diluted to l liter with DI water and mixed
well. Other combinations of eluants and/or columns may be employed provided
peak resolution, as described in Section 5.4, repeatability and linearity, as
described in Section 6.2, and analytical sensitivity are acceptable.
4.4.2 Post-oolumn Reagent. An effective post-column reagent for use with
the chrcnatographic eluent described in Section 4.4.1 is a diphenylcarbazide
(DPC) based system. Dissolve 0.5 g of 1,5-diphenylcarbazide (DPC) in 100 ml of
ACS grade methanol. Add to 500 ml of degassed containing 50 ml of 96%
spectrophotometric grade sulfuric acid. Dilute to 1 liter with degassed DI
water.
B-44
-------
4.4.4 Cr4^ Calibration Standard. Prepare Cr4"6 standards from potassium
dichromate (I^C^Oy, FW 294.19). To prepare a 1000 ug/ml Cr+6 stock solution,
dissolve 2.829 g of dry K2Cr2°7 in 1 liter of DI water. To prepare working
standards, dilute the stock solution to the chosen standard concentrations for
instrument calibration with 0.05 N KOH to achieve a matrix similar to the
actual field samples.
4.4.5 Performance Audit Sample. A performance audit sample shall be
obtained from the Quality Assurance Division of EPA and analyzed with the field
samples. The mailing address to request audit samples is:
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Atmospheric Research And Exposure Assessment Laboratory
Quality Assurance Division
Source Branch, Mail Drop 77-A
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
The audit sample should be prepared in a suitable sample matrix at a
concentration similar to the actual field samples.
5. Procedure
SAFTEY FIRST - WEAR SAFETY GLASSES AT ALL TIMES DURING IKES TEST METHOD.
5.1 Sampling. The complexity of this method is such that to obtain
reliable results, testers should be trained and experienced with test
procedures.
5.1.1 Pretest Preparation. All components shall be maintained and
calibrated according to the procedures described in AFID-0576, unless otherwise
specified herein.
Rinse all sample train components from the glass nozzle up to the silica
gel inpinger and sample containers with hot tap water followed by washing with
hot soapy water. Next, rinse the train components and sample containers three
times with tap water followed by three rinses with DI water. All the
components and containers should then be soaked overnight, or a minimum of 4
hours, in a 10 % (v/v) nitric acid solution, then rinsed three times with DI
water. Allow the conponents to air dry prior to covering all openings with
Parafilro, or equivalent.
5.1.2 Preliminary Determinations. Same as Method 5, Section 4.1.2.
5.1.3 Preparation of Sampling Train. Measure 300 ml of 0.1 N KOH into a
graduated cylinder (or tare-weighed precleaned polyethylene container). Place
approximately 150 ml of the 0.1 N KOH reagent in the first Teflon impinger.
Split the rest of the 0.1 N KOH between the second and third Teflon impingers.
The next Teflon impinger is left dry. Place a preweighed 200-to 400-g portion
of indicating silica gel in the final glass impinger. (For sampling periods in
excess of two hours, or for high moisture sites, 400-g of silica gel is
recommended.)
B-45
-------
Retain reagent blanks of the 0.1 N KOH equal to the volumes vised with the
field samples.
5.1.4 Leak-Check Procedures. Follow the leak-check procedures given in
Method 5, Section 4.1.4.1 (Pretest Leak-Check), Section 4.1.4.2 (Leak-Checks
During the Saaple Run), and Section 4.1.4.3 (Post-Test Leak-Checks).
5.1.5 Sampling Train Operation. Folic*/ the procedures given in Method 5,
Section 4.1.5. The sampling train should be iced down with water and ice to
insure heat transfer with the Teflon impingers.
NOTE: If the gas to be sanpled is above 200°F, it may be necessary to wrap
three or four feet of the Teflon sample and recirculating lines inside the ice
bath to keep the recirculated reagent cool enough so it does not turn to steam.
For each run, record the data required on a data sheet such as the one shown
in Figure 5-2 of Method 5.
At the end of the sampling run, determine the pH of the reagent in the first
inpinger using a pH indicator strip. The pH of the solution shall be greater
than 8.5.
5.1.6 Calculation of Percent Isokinetic. Same as Method 5, Section 4.1.6.
5.2 Post-test Nitrogen Purge. The nitrogen purge is used as a safeguard
against the conversion of hexavalent chromium to the trivalent oxidation state.
The purge is effective in the removal of SO2 frcra the impinger contents.
Attach the nitrogen purge line to the input of the impinger train. Check to
insure the output of the impinger train is open, and that the recirculating
line is capped off. Cpen the nitrogen gas flew slowly and adjust the delivery
rate to 10 L/min. Check the recirculating line to insure that the pressure is
not forcing the impinger reagent out through this line. Continue the purge
under these conditions for one-half hour periodically checking the flow rate.
5.3 Sample Recovery. Begin cleanup procedures as soon as the train
assembly has been purged at the end of the sampling run. The probe assembly
does may be disconnected frcan the sample train prior to sample purging.
Ihe probe assembly should be allowed to cool prior to sample recovery.
Disconnect the umbilical cord frcra the sample train. When the probe assembly
can be safely handled, wipe off all external particulate matter near the tip of
the nozzle, and cap the nozzle prior to transporting the sample train to a
clean up area that is clean and protected frcan the wind and other potential
causes of contamination or loss of sample. Inspect the train before and during
disassembly and note any abnormal conditions.
5.3.1 Container No. 1 (Impingers 1 through 3). Disconnect the first
impinger frcra the second impinger and disconnect the recirculation line from
the aspirator or peristaltic pump. Drain the Teflon impingers into a
precleaned graduated cylinder or tare-weighed precleaned polyethylene sample
container and measure the volume of the liquid to within 1 ml or 1 gra. Record
the volume of liquid present as this information is required to calculate the
moisture content of the flue gas sample. If necessary, transfer the sample
frcan the graduated cylinder to a precleaned polyethylene sample container.
With DI water, rinse four times the insides of the glass nozzle, the
aspirator, the sample and recirculation lines, the impingers, and the
B-46
-------
connecting tubing, and combine the rinses with the impinger solution in the
sample container.
5.3.2 Container No. 2 (HNO3 rinse optional for total chrcaniura). With 0.1 N
HN03, rinse three tines the entire train assembly, from the nozzle to the
fourth impinger and combine the rinses into a separate precleaned polyethylene
sainple container for possible total chromium analysis. Repeat the rinse
procedure a final time with DI water, and discard the water rinses. Mark the
height of the fluid level on the container or, alternatively if a balance is
available, weigh the container and record the weight to permit determination of
any leakage during transport. Label the container clearly to identify its
contents,
5.3.3 Container No. 3 (Silica Gel). Note the color of the indicating
silica gel to determine if it has been completely spent. Quantitatively
transfer the silica gel frcan its impinger to the original container, and seal
the container. A funnel and a rubber policeman may be used to aid in the
transfer. The small amount of particulate that may adhere to the impinger wall
need not be removed. Do not use water or other liquids to transfer the silica
gel. Alternatively, if a balance is available in the field, record the weight
of the spent silica gel (or the silica gel plus impinger) to the nearest 0.5 g.
5.3.4 Container No. 4 (0.1 N KQH Blank). Once during each field test,
plaoe a volume of reagent equal to the volume placed in the sample train into a
precleaned polyethylene sample container, and seal the container. Mark the
height of the fluid level on the container or, alternatively if a balance is
available, weigh the container and record the weight to permit determination of
any leakage during transport. label the container clearly to identify its
contents.
5.3.5 Container No. 5 (DX water Blank). Once during each field test,
place a volume of DI water equal to the volume employed to rinse the sample
train into a precleaned polyethylene sample container, and seal the container.
Mark the height of the fluid level on the container or, alternatively if a
balance is available, weigh the container and record the weight to permit
determination of any leakage during transport. Label the container clearly to
identify its contents.
5.3.6 Container No. 6 (0.1 N HNO3 Blank). Once during each field test if
total chranium is to be determined/ place a volume of 0.1 N HNO3 reagent equal
to the volume employed to rinse the sample train into a precleaned
polyethylene sairple container, and seal the container. Mark the height of the
fluid level on the container or, alternatively if a balance is available, weigh
the container and record the weight to permit determination of any leakage
during transport. Label the container clearly to identify its contents.
5.4 Sample Preparation. For determination of Cr"*"6, the sample should be
filtered immediately following recovery to remove any insoluble matter.
Nitrogen gas may be used as a pressure assist to the filtration process (see
Figure Cr^-4) .
B-47
-------
VALVE
-oo-
REGULATOR
N? TANK
TEFLON
RESERVOIR
TEFLON FILTER HOLDER
wrm .45 MICRON FILTER
1000 ml
GRADUATED CYLINDER
Figure Cr+®-4. Schematic of sample filter system.
4195 2/90
B-48
-------
Filter the entire iitpirager sample through a 0.45 micrometer acetate filter
(or equivalent), and collect the filtrate in a 1000-ml graduated cylinder.
Rinse the sample container with DI water three separate times and pass these
rinses through the filter, and add the rinses to the sample filtrate. Rinse
the Teflon reservoir with DI water three separate times and pass these rinses
through the filter, and add the rinses to the saitple. Determine the final
volume of the filtrate and rinses and return them to the rinsed polyethylene
sample container. Label the container clearly to identify its contents. Rinse
the Teflon reservoir once with 0.1 N HNO3 and once with DI water and discard
these rinses.
If total chromium is to be determined, quantitatively recover the filter
and residue and place them in a vial. (The acetate filter may be digested with
5 ml of 70% nitric acid; this digestion solution may then be diluted with DI
water for total chratiium analysis.)
NOTE: If the source has a large amount of particulate in the effluent
stream, testing teams may wish to filter the sample twice, once through a 2-5
micrometer filter, then through the 0.45 micrometer filter.
5.4.1 Container 2 (HNO3 rinse, optional for total chromium). This saitple
shall be analyzed in accordance with the selected procedure for total chromium
analysis. At a minimum, the sample should be subjected to a digestion
procedure sufficient to solubilize all chromium present.
5.4.2 Container 3 (Silica Gel). Weigh the spent silica gel to the nearest
0.5 g using a balance. (Ibis step may be conducted in the field.)
5.5 Sample Analysis. The Cr*6 content of the sample filtrate is
determined by ion chromatography coupled with a post column reactor (IC/PCR) .
To increase sensitivity for trace levels of chrcraium a preconcentration system
is also used in conjunction with the IC/PCR.
Prior to preconcentration and/or analysis, all field samples will be
filtered through a 0.45 um filter. This filtration should be conducted just
prior to sample injection/analysis.
The preconcentration is accomplished by selectively retaining the analyte on
a solid absorbent (as described in 3.4.3), follcwed by removal of the analyte
from the absorbent. ..The saitple is injected into a sample loop of the desired
size (repeated loadings or larger size loop for greater sensitivity) and the
Cr*6 is collected on the resin bed of the column. When the injection valve is
switched, the eluent displaces the concentrated Cr*6 sample moving it off the
preconcentration column and onto the IC anion separation column. After
separation from other sample components, Cr"^ forms a specific corplex in the
post-column reactor with a diphenylcarbaz ide reaction solution, and the catplex
is then detected by visible absorbance at a wavelength of 520 nm. The amount
of absorbance measured is proportional to the concentration of the Cr"^ canplex
formed. The IC retention time and absorbance of the Cr-1"6 conplex is conpared
with kncwn Cr"*"6 standards analyzed under identical conditions to provide both
qualitative and quantitative analyses.
B-49
-------
Prior to sanple analysis establish a stable baselir^e with the detector set
at the required attenuation by setting the eluent flowrate at approximately 1
ml/min and post column reagent flew rate at approximately 0.5 ml/miru (Note:
As long as the ratio of eluent flowrate to PCS. flcwrate remains constant, the
standard curve should remain linear.) Inject a sample of DI water to insure
that no Cr*6 appears in the water blank.
First, inject the calibration standards prepared, as described in Section
4.4.4, to cover the appropriate concentration range, starting with the lowest
standard first. Next, inject, in duplicate, the performance audit sample,
followed by the 0.1 N KOH field blank and the field samples. Finally, repeat
the injection of the calibration standards to allow for compensation of
instrument drift. Measure areas or heights of the Cr^/DPC complex
chranatogram peak. The response for replicate, consecutive injections of
samples must be within 5 percent of the average response, or the injection
should be repeated until the 5 percent criteria can be met. Use the average
response (peak areas or heights) fran the duplicate injections of calibration
standards to generate a linear calibration curve. Fran the calibration curve,
determine the concentration of the field samples employing the average response
from the duplicate injections.
The results for the analysis of the performance audit sample must be within
10 percent of the reference value far the field sanple analysis to be valid.
6. Calibration. Maintain a written log of all calibration activities.
6.1 Sanple Train Calibration. Calibrate the sanple train components
according to the indicated sections of Method 5: Probe Nozzle (Section 5.1);
Pi tot Tube (Section 5.2); Metering System (Section 5.3); Tenperature Gauges
(Section 5.5); Leak-Check of the Metering System (Section 5.6); and Barometer
(Section 5.7).
6.2 Calibration Curve far the IC/PCR. Prepare working standards fran the
stock solution described in Section 4.4.4. by dilution with a DI water
solution to approximate the field sanple matrix. Prepare at least four
standards to cover one order of magnitude that bracket the field sanple
concentrations. Run the standards with the field samples as described in
Section 5.5. Far each standard, determine the peak areas (reconraended) or the
peak heights, calculate the average response frail the duplicate injections,
and plot the average response against the Cr4^ concentration in ug/1. ihe
individual responses for each calibration standard determined before and after
field sanple analysis mast be within 5 percent of the average response for the
analysis to be valid. If the 5 percent criteria is exceeded, excessive drift
arci/ar instrument degradation may have occurred, and must be corrected before
further analyses are performed.
Employing regression, calculate a predicted value for each
calibration standard with the average response for the duplicate injections.
Each predicted value most be within 7 percent of the actual value for the
calibration curve to be considered acceptable. Remake and/or rerun the
calibration standards. If the calibration curve is still unacceptable, reduce
the range of the curve.
B-50
-------
7. Calculations
7.1 Dry Gas Volume. Using the data fran the test, calculate VTn^std^, the
dry gas sample volume at standard conditions as outlined in Section 6.3 of
Method 5.
7.2 Volume of Water Vapor and Moisture Content. Using the data fran the
test, calculate ^(std) an^ Bws' the volume of water vapor and the moisture
content of the stack gas, respectively, using Equations 5-2 and 5-3 of.;Method
5.
7.3 Stack Gas Velocity. Using the data frcsn the test and Equation 2--&of
Method 2, calculate the average stack gas velocity.
7.4 Total ug Cr*5 Per Sample. Calculate as described be lew: -c
m = (S-B) x V^g x d
Wiere:
m = Mass of Cr"*"6 in the sample, ug,
S = Concentration of sample, ug Cr^/ml,
B - Concentration of blank, ug Cr^/ml, 0
vls = Volume of sanple after filtration, ml, and,
d — Dilution factor (1 if not diluted).
B-51
-------
METHOD 0010
MODIFIED METHOD 5 SAMPLING TRAIN
1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION
1.1 This method is applicable to the determination of Destruction and
Removal Efficiency (DRE) of semlvolatile Principal Organic Hazardous Compounds
(POHCs) from incineration systems (PHS, 1967). This method also may be used
to determine particulate emission rates from stationary sources as per EPA
Method 5 (see References at end of this method).
2.0 SUMMARY OF METHOD
2.1 Gaseous and particulate pollutants are withdrawn from an emission
source at an Isokinetic sampling rate and are collected in a multlconponent
sampling train. Principal components of the train Include a high-efficiency
glass- or quartz-fiber filter and a packed bed of porous polymeric adsorbent
resin. The filter is used to collect organic-laden particulate materials and
the porous polymeric resin to adsorb semlvolatile organic species.
Semlvolatile species are defined as compounds with boiling points >100*C.
2.2 Comprehensive chemical analyses of the collected sample are
conducted to determine the concentration and Identity of the organic
materials.
3.0 INTERFERENCES
3.1 Oxides of nitrogen (N0X) are possible Interferents 1n the
determination of certain water-soluble compounds such as dloxane, phenol, and
urethane; reaction of these compounds with N0v 1n the presence of moisture
will reduce their concentration. Other possibilities that could result 1n
positive or negative bias are (1) stability of the compounds In methylene
chloride, (2) the formation of water-soluble organic salts on the resin 1n the
presence of moisture, and (3) the solvent extraction efficiency of water-
soluble compounds from aqueous media. Use of two or more ions per compound
for qualitative and quantitative analysis can overcome interference at one
mass. These concerns should be addressed on a compound-by-compound basis
before using this method.
4.0 APPARATUS AND MATERIALS
4.1 Sampling train:
4.1.1 A schematic of the sampling train used in this method Is
shown In Figure 1. This sampling train configuration 1s adapted from EPA
Method 5 procedures, and, as such, the majority of the required equipment
0010 - 1
Revision 0
Date September 1986
B-52
-------
Temperature Sensor
Probe
Reverse-Type Pilot Tube
-------
is identical to that used in EPA Method 5 determinations. The new
components required are a condenser coil and a sorbent module, which are
used to collect semivolatlle organic materials that pass through the
glass- or quartz-fiber filter in the gas phase.
4.1.2 Construction details for the basic train components are given
in APTD-0581 (see Martin, 1971, in Section 13.0, References); commercial
models of this equipment are also available. Specifications for the
sorbent module are provided in the following subsections. Additionally,
the following subsections 11st changes to APTD-0581 and identify
allowable train configuration modifications.
4.1.3 Basic operating and maintenance procedures for the sampling
train are described 1n APTD-0576 (see Rom? 1972, in Section 13.0,
References). As correct usage is important in obtaining valid results,
all users should refer to APTD-0576 and adopt the operating and
maintenance procedures outlined therein unless otherwise specified. The
sampling train consists of the components detailed below.
4.1.3.1 Probe nozzle: Stainless steel (316) or glass with
sharp, tapered (30* angle) leading edge. The taper shall be on the
outside to preserve a constant I.D. The nozzle shall be buttonhook
or elbow design and constructed from seamless tubing (If made of
stainless steel). Other construction materials may be considered
for particular applications. A range of nozzle sizes suitable for
isokinetic sampling should be available in increments of 0.16 cm
(1/16 In.), e.g., 0.32-1.27 cm (1/8-1/2 1n.), or larger 1f higher
volume sampling trains are used. Each nozzle shall be calibrated
according to the procedures outlined 1n Paragraph 9.1.
4.1.3.2 Probe liner: Boroslllcate or quartz-glass tubing with
a heating system capable of maintaining a gas temperature of 120 +
14*C (248 + 25*F) at the exit end during sampling. (The tester may
opt to operate the equipment at a temperature lower than that
specified.) Because the actual temperature at the outlet of the
probe is not usually monitored during sampling, probes constructed
according to APTD-0581 and utilizing the calibration curves of APTD-
0576 (or calibrated according to the procedure outlined 1n APTD-
0576) are considered acceptable. Either boroslllcate or quartz-
glass probe liners may be used for stack temperatures up to about
480*C (900*F). Quartz liners shall be used for temperatures between
480 and 900*C (900 and 1650*F). (The softening temperature for
borosillcate is 820*C (1508'F)f and for quartz 1500#C (2732*F).)
Water-cooling of the stainless steel sheath will be necessary at
temperatures approaching and exceeding 500*C.
4.1.3.3 P1tot tube: Type S, as described 1n Section 2.1 of
EPA Method 2, or other appropriate devices (Vollaro, 1976). The
pltot tube shall be attached to the probe to allow constant
monitoring of the stack-gas velocity. The Impact (high-pressure)
opening plane of the pltot tube shall be even with or above the
nozzle entry plane (see EPA Method 2, Figure 2-6b) during sampling.
The Type S pltot tube assembly shall have a known coefficient,
determined as outlined in Section 4 of EPA Method 2.
0010 - 3
Revision 0
Date September 1985
B-54
-------
4.1.3.4 Differential pressure gauge: Inclined manometer or
equivalent device as described 1n Section 2.2 of EPA Method 2. One
manometer shall be used for velocity-head (AP) readings and the
other for orifice differential pressure (AH) readings.
4.1.3.5 Filter holder: BoroslHcate glass, with a glass frit
filter support and a sealing gasket. The sealing gasket should be
made of materials that will not Introduce organic material Into the
gas stream at the temperature at which the filter holder will be
maintained. The gasket shall be constructed of Teflon or materials
of equal or better characteristics. The holder design shall provide
a positive seal against leakage at any point along the filter
circumference. The holder shall be attached immediately to the
outlet of the cyclone or cyclone bypass.
4.1.3.6 Filter heating system: Any heating system capable of
maintaining a temperature of 120 + 14*C (248 + 25*F) around the
filter holder during sampling. Other temperatures may be
appropriate for particular applications. Alternatively, the tester
may opt to operate the equipment at temperatures other than that
specified. A temperature gauge capable of measuring temperature to
within 3*C (5.4*F) shall be Installed so that the temperature around
the filter holder can be regulated and monitored during sampling.
Heating systems other than the one shown 1n APTD-0581 may be used.
4.1.3.7 Organic sampling module: This unit consists of three
sections, Including a gas-conditioning section, a sorbent trap, and
a condensate knockout trap. The gas-cond1t1on1ng system shall be
capable of conditioning the gas leaving the back half of the filter
holder to a temperature not exceeding 20*C (68*F). The sorbent trap
shall be sized to Contain approximately 20 g of porous polymeric
resin (Rohm and Haas XAD-2 or equivalent) and shall be Jacketed to
maintain the Internal gas temperature at 17 + 3*C (62.5 + 5.4*F).
The most commonly used coolant Is 1ce water from the Implnger Ice-
water bath, constantly circulated through the outer jacket, using
rubber or plastic tubing and a peristaltic pump. The sorbent trap
should be outfitted with a glass well or depression, appropriately
sized to accommodate a small thermocouple 1n the trap for monitoring
the gas entry temperature. The condensate knockout trap shall be of
sufficient size to collect the condensate following gas
conditioning. The organic module components shall be oriented to
direct the flow of condensate formed vertically downward from the
conditioning section, through the adsorbent media, and into the
condensate knockout trap. The knockout trap 1s usually similar 1n
appearance to an empty implnger directly underneath the sorbent
module; It may be oversized but should have a shortened center stem
(at a minimum, one-half the length of the normal Implnger stems) to
collect a large volume of condensate without bubbling and
overflowing into the implnger train. All surfaces of the organic
module wetted by the gas sample shall be fabricated of boroslllcate
glass, Teflon, or other Inert materials. Commercial versions of the
0010 - 4
Revision 0
Date September 1986
B-55
9
-------
complete organic module are not currently available, but may be
assembled from commercially available laboratory glassware and a
custom-fabricated sorbent trap. Details of two acceptable designs
are shown in Figures 2 and 3 (the thermocouple well Is shown in
Figure 2).
4.1.3.8 Implnqer train: To determine the stack-gas moisture
content, four 500-mL impingers, connected 1n series with leak-free
ground-glass joints, follow the knockout trap. The first, third,
and fourth impingers shall be of the Greenburg-Snith design,
modified by replacing the tip with a 1.3-cm (l/2-1n.) I.D. glass
tube extending about 1.3 cm (1/2 1n.) from the bottom of the outer
cylinder. The second implnger shall be of the Greenburg-Sm1th
design with the standard tip. The first and second impingers shall
contain known quantities of water or appropriate trapping solution.
The third shall be empty or charged with a caustic solution, should
the stack gas contain hydrochloric acid (HC1). The fourth shall
contain a known weight of silica gel or equivalent desiccant.
4.1.3.9 Metering system: The necessary components are a
vacuum gauge, leak-free pump, thermometers capable of measuring
temperature to within 3*C (5.4*F), dry-gas meter capable of
measuring volume to within IX, and related equipment, as shown 1n
Figure 1. At a minimum, the pump should be capable of 4 cfm free
flow, and the dry-gas meter should have a recording capacity of
0-999.9 cu ft with a resolution of 0.005 cu ft. Other metering
systems capable of maintaining sampling rates within 10% of
Isokineticity and of determining sample volumes to within 2% may be
used. The metering system must be used In conjunction with a pltot
tube to enable checks of isokinetic sampling rates. Sampling trains
using metering systems designed for flow rates higher than those
described in APTD-0581 and APTD-0576 may be used, provided that the
specifications of this method are met.
4.1.3.10 Barometer: Mercury, aneroid, or other barometer
capable of measuring atmospheric pressure to within 2.5 mm Hg (0.1
in. Hg). In many cases the barometric reading may be obtained from
a nearby National Weather Service station, in which case the station
value (which 1s the absolute barometric pressure) 1s requested and
an adjustment for elevation differences between the weather station
and sampling point Is applied at a rate of minus 2.5 mm Hg (0.1 In.
Hg) per 30-m (100 ft) elevation Increase (vice versa for elevation
decrease).
4.1.3.11 Gas density determination equipment: Temperature
sensor and pressure gauge (as described in Sections 2.3 and 2.4 of
EPA Method 2), and gas analyzer, if necessary (as described in EPA
Method 3). The temperature sensor Ideally should be permanently
attached to the pltot tube or sampling probe in a fixed
configuration such that the tip of the sensor extends beyond the
leading edge of the probe sheath and does not touch any metal.
0010 - 5
B-56
Revision 0
Date September 1986
-------
H
ta
i
Ln
o TO
&» a>
r+ <
O -*
l/> O
n zi
XJ
T
28/12
Ball Joint
¦v! - 11/16" or 45 mm
I
^6.5 in.
or
168 mm
X
AO RC Glass Frit
Socket Joint
Water Jacket
Figure 2. Adsorbenl Somplinq System.
-------
Flow Direction
Retaining Spring
8 mm Glass Cooling Coil
Glass Wool Plug -
Glass Flitted Disc
28/12 Bill Joint
Fritted Stainless Steel Disc
Glass Water Jacket
15 mm Solv Seal Joint
(or 28/12 Socket Joint)
Figure 3. Adsorbent Sampling System.
-------
Alternatively, the sensor may be attached just prior to use In the
field. Note, however, that If the temperature sensor is attached 1n
the field, the sensor must be placed 1n an interference-free
arrangement with respect to the Type 5 pitot tube openings (see EPA
Method 2, Figure 2-7). As a second alternative, 1f a difference of
no more than 1% in the average velocity measurement 1s to be
introduced, the temperature gauge need not be attached to the probe
or pitot tube.
4.1.3.12 Calibrat1on/f1eld-preparation record: A permanently
bound laboratory notebook, in which duplicate copies of data may be
made as they are being recorded, is required for documenting and
recording calibrations and preparation procedures (I.e., filter and
silica gel tare weights, clean XAD-2, qual1ty assurance/qual1ty
control check results, dry-gas meter, and thermocouple calibrations,
etc.). The duplicate copies should be detachable and should be
stored separately in the test program archives.
4.2 Sample Recovery:
4.2.1 Probe liner: Probe nozzle and organic module conditioning
section brushes; nylon bristle brushes with stainless steel wire handles
are required. The probe brush shall have extensions of stainless steel,
Teflon, or Inert material at least as long as the probe. The brushes
shall be properly sized and shaped to brush out the probe liner, the
probe nozzle, and the organic module conditioning section.
4.2.2 Wash bottles: Three. Teflon or glass wash bottles are
recommended; polyethylene wash bottles should not be used because organic
contaminants may be extracted by exposure to organic solvents used for
sample recovery.
4.2.3 Glass sample storage containers: Chemically resistant,
boroslllcate amber and clear glass bottles, 500-ml or 1,000-ml. Bottles
should be tinted to prevent action of light on sample. Screw-cap liners
shall be either Teflon or constructed so as to be leak-free and resistant
to chemical attack by organic recovery solvents. Narrow-mouth glass
bottles have been found to exhibit less tendency toward leakage.
4.2.4 Petri dishes: Glass, sealed around the circumference with
wide (l-1n.) Teflon tape, for storage and transport of filter samples.
4.2.5 Graduated cylinder and/or balances: To measure condensed
water to the nearest 1 mL or 1 g. Graduated cylinders shall have
subdivisions not >2 mL. Laboratory triple-beam balances capable of
weighing to +0.5 g or better are required.
4.2.6 Plastic storage containers: Screw-cap polypropylene or
polyethylene containers to store silica gel.
4.2.7 Funnel and rubber policeman: To aid In transfer of silica
gel to container (not necessary 1f silica gel 1s weighed 1n field).
0010 - 8
Revision 0
Date September 1986
B-59
-------
4.2.8 Funnels: Glass, to aid 1n sample recovery.
4.3 Filters: Glass- or quartz-fiber filters, without organic binder,
exhibiting at least 99.95% efficiency (<0.05% penetration) on 0.3-um dloctyl
phthalate smoke particles. The filter efficiency test shall be conducted 1n
accordance with ASTM standard method D2986-71. Test data from the supplier's
quality control program are sufficient for this purpose. In sources
containing SO2 or SO3, the filter material must be of a type that 1s
unreactlve to SO? or SO3. Reeve Angel 934 AH or Schleicher and Schwell #3
filters work well under these conditions.
Crushed Ice: Quantities ranging from 10-50 lb may be necessary
during a sampling run, depending on ambient air temperature.
4.5 Stopcock grease: Solvent-insoluble, heat-stable silicone grease.
Use of silicone grease upstream of the module is not permitted, and amounts
used on components located downstream of the organic module shall be
minimized. Silicone grease usage 1s not necessary 1f screw-on connectors and
Teflon sleeves or ground-glass joints are used.
4.6 Glass wool: Used to plug the unfritted end of the sorbent module.
The glass-wool fiber should be solvent-extracted with methylene chloride In a
Soxhlet extractor for 12 hr and air-dried prior to use.
5.0 REAGENTS
5.1 Adsorbent resin: Porous polymeric resin (XAD-2 or equivalent) Is
recommended! These resins shall be cleaned prior to their use for sample
collection. Appendix A of this method should be consulted to determine
appropriate precleanlng procedure. For best results, resin used should not
exhibit a blank of higher than 4 mg/kg of total chromatographable organlcs
(TCO) (see Appendix B) prior to use. Once cleaned, resin should be stored 1n
an airtight, wide-mouth amber glass container with a Teflon-Hned cap or
placed In one of the glass sorbent modules tightly sealed with Teflon film and
elastic bands. The resin should be used within 4 wk of the preparation,
5.2 Silica gel: Indicating type, 6-16 mesh. If previously used, dry at
175*C (350#F) for 2 hr before using. New silica gel may be used as received.
Alternatively, other types of deslccants (equivalent or better) may be used,
subject to the approval of the Administrator.
5.3 Impinger solutions: Distilled organic-free water (Type II) shall be
used, unless sampling 1s intended to quantify a particular Inorganic gaseous
species. If sampling 1s Intended to quantify the concentration of additional
species, the impinger solution of choice shall be subject to Administrator
approval. This water should be prescreened for any compounds of interest.
One hundred mL will be added to the specified impinger; the third Impinger 1n
the train may be charged with a basic solution (1 N sodium hydroxide or sodium
acetate) to protect the sampling pump from acidic gases. Sodium acetate
should be used when large sample volumes are anticipated because sodium
hydroxide will react with carbon dioxide in aqueous media to form sodium
carbonate, which may possibly plug the Impinger.
0010 - 9
Revision 0
Date September 1986
B-60
-------
5.4 Sample recovery reagents:
5.4.1 Methylene chloride: D1st1lled-1n-glass grade Is required for
sample recovery and cleanup (see Note to 5.4.2 below).
5.4.2 Methyl alcohol: D1st1lled-1n-glass grade 1s required for
sample recovery and cleanup.
NOTE: Organic solvents from metal containers may have a high
residue blank and should not be used. Sometimes suppliers
transfer solvents from metal to glass bottles: thus blanks shall
be run prior to field use and only solvents with low blank value
«0.001%) shall be used.
5.4.3 Water: Water (Type II) shall be used for rinsing the organic
module and condenser component.
6.0 SAMPLE COLLECTION, PRESERVATION, AND HANDLING
6.1 Because of complexity of this method, field personnel should be
trained in and experienced with the test procedures in order to obtain
reliable results.
6.2 Laboratory preparation:
6.2.1 All the components shall be maintained and calibrated
according to the procedure described 1n APTD-0576, unless otherwise
specified.
6.2.2 Weigh several 200- to 300-g portions of silica gel 1n
airtight containers to the nearest 0.5 g. Record on each container the
total weight of the silica gel plus containers. As an alternative to
prewelghlng the silica gel, 1t may Instead be weighed directly 1n the
implnger or sampling holder just prior to train assembly.
6.2.3 Check filters visually against light for irregularities and
flaws or pinhole leaks. Label the shipping containers (glass Petri
dishes) and keep the filters In these containers at all times except
during sampling and weighing.
6.2.4 Desiccate the filters at 20 + 5.6*C (68 + 10'F) and ambient
pressure for at least 24 hr, and weigh at intervals of at least 6 hr to a
constant weight (I.e., <0.5-mg change from previous weighing), recording
results to the nearest 0.1 mg. During each weighing the filter must not
be exposed for more than a 2-mln period to the laboratory atmosphere and
relative humidity above 50X. Alternatively (unless otherwise specified
by the Administrator), the filters may be oven-dried at 105*C (220*F) for
2-3 hr, desiccated for 2 hr, and weighed.
0010 - 10
Revision 0
Date September 1986
B-61
-------
6.3 Preliminary field determinations:
6.3.1 Select the sampling site and the minimum number of sampling
points according to EPA Method 1 or as specified by the Administrator.
Determine the stack pressure, temperature, and range of velocity heads
using EPA Method 2. It Is recommended that a leak-check of the pitot
lines (see EPA Method 2, Section 3.1) be performed. Determine the stack-
gas moisture content using EPA Approximation Method 4 or its alternatives
to establish estimates of isokinetic sampling-rate settings. Determine
the stack-gas dry molecular weight, as described in EPA Method 2, Section
3.6. If integrated EPA Method 3 sampling 1s used for molecular weight
determination, the Integrated bag sample shall be taken simultaneously
with, and for the same total length of time as, the sample run.
6.3.2 Select a nozzle size based on the range of velocity heads so
that 1t 1s not necessary to change the nozzle size 1n order to maintain
Isokinetic sampling rates. During the run, do not change the nozzle.
Ensure that the proper differential pressure gauge 1s chosen for the
range of velocity heads encountered (see Section 2.2 of EPA Method 2).
6.3.3 Select a suitable probe liner and probe length so that all
traverse points can be sampled. For large stacks, to reduce the length
of the probe, consider sampling from opposite sides of the stack.
6.3.4 A minimum of 3 dscm (105.9 dscf) of sample volume 1s required
for the determination of the Destruction and Removal Efficiency (DRE) of
POHCs from Incineration systems. Additional sample volume shall be
collected as necessitated by analytical detection Hm1t constraints. To
determine the minimum sample volume required, refer to sample
calculations 1n Section 10.0.
6.3.5 Determine the total length of sampling time needed to obtain
the Identified minimum volume by comparing the anticipated average
sampling rate with the volume requirement. Allocate the same time to all
traverse points defined by EPA Method 1. To avoid timekeeping errors,
the length of time sampled at each traverse point should be an integer or
an Integer plus one-half m1n.
6.3.6 In some circumstances (e.g., batch cycles) 1t may be
necessary to sample for shorter times at the traverse points and to
obtain smaller gas-sample volumes. In these cases, the Administrator's
approval must first be obtained.
6.4 Preparation of collection train:
6.4.1 During preparation and assembly of the sampling train, keep
all openings where contamination can occur covered with Teflon film or
aluminum foil until just prior to assembly or until sampling 1s about to
begin.
0010 - 11
Revision 0
Date September 1986
B-62
-------
6.4.2 Fill the sorbent trap section of the organic module with
approximately 20 g of clean adsorbent resin. While filling, ensure that
the trap packs uniformly, to eliminate the possibility of channeling.
When freshly cleaned, many adsorbent resins carry a static charge, which
will cause clinging to trap walls. This may be minimized by filling the
trap 1n the presence of an antistatic device. Commercial antistatic
devices include Model-204 and Model-210 manufactured by the 3M Company,
St. Paul, Minnesota.
6.4.3 If an 1mp1nger train 1s used to collect moisture, place 100
mL of water 1n each of the first two implngers, leave the third 1mp1nger
empty (or charge with caustic solution, as necessary), and transfer
approximately 200-300 g of prewelghed silica gel from Its container to
the fourth Implnger, More silica gel may be used, but care should be
taken to ensure that it 1s not entrained and carried out from the
implnger during sampling. Place the container 1n a clean place for later
use in the sample recovery. Alternatively, the weight of the silica gel
plus implnger may be determined to the nearest 0.5 g and recorded.
6.4.4 Using a tweezer or clean disposable surgical gloves, place a
labeled (Identified) and weighed filter In the filter holder. Be sure
that the filter 1s properly centered and the gasket properly placed to
prevent the sample gas stream from circumventing the filter. Check the
filter for tears after assembly is completed.
6.4.5 When glass liners are used, Install the selected nozzle using
a V1ton-A O-ring when stack temperatures are <260'C (500*F) and a woven
glass-fiber gasket when temperatures are higher. See APTD-0576 (Rom,
1972) for details. Other connecting systems utilizing either 316
stainless steel or Teflon ferrules may be used. When metal liners are
used, Install the nozzle as above, or by a leak-free direct mechanical
connection. Mark the probe with heat-resistant tape or by some other
method to denote the proper distance Into the stack or duct for each
sampling point.
6.4.6 Set up the train as 1n Figure 1. During assembly, do not use
any silicone grease on ground-glass Joints that are located upstream of
the organic module. A"very light coating of silicone grease may be used
on all ground-glass joints that are located downstream of the organic
module, but 1t should be limited to the outer portion (see APTD-0576) of
the ground-glass joints to minimize slllcone-grease contamination.
Subject to the approval of the Administrator, a glass cyclone may be used
between the probe and the filter holder when the total particulate catch
is expected to exceed 100 mg or when water droplets are present 1n the
stack. The organic module condenser must be maintained at a temperature
of 17 + 3*C. Connect all temperature sensors to an appropriate
potentiometer/display unit. Check all temperature sensors at ambient
temperature.
6.4.7 Place crushed Ice around the Implngers and the organic module
condensate knockout.
0010 - 12
B-63
Revision 0
Date September 1986
-------
6.4.8 Turn on the sorbent module and condenser coll coolant
recirculating pump and begin monitoring the sorbent module gas entry
temperature. Ensure proper sorbent module gas entry temperature before
proceeding and again before any sampling 1s initiated. It is extremely
Important that the XAO-2 resin temperature never exceed 50*C (122*F),
because thermal decomposition will occur. During testing, the XAD-2
temperature must not exceed 20*C (68*F) for efficient capture of the
semlvolatlle species of interest.
6.4.9 Turn on and set the filter and probe heating systems at the
desired operating temperatures. Allow time for the temperatures to
stabi1ize.
6.5 Leak-check procedures
6.5.1 Pre-test leak-check:
6.5.1.1 Because the number of additional Intercomponent
connections 1n the Sem1-V0ST train (over the M5 Train) increases the
possibility of leakage, a pre-test leak-check 1s required.
6.5.1.2 After the sampling train has been assembled, turn on
and set the filter and probe heating systems at the desired
operating temperatures. Allow time for the temperatures to
stabilize. If a V1ton A 0-r1ng or other leak-free connection 1s
used in assembling the probe nozzle to the probe Uner, leak-check
the train at the sampling site by plugging the nozzle and pulling a
381-mm Hg (15-1n. Hg) vacuum.
(NOTE: A lower vacuum may be used, provided that it 1s not exceeded
during the test.)
6.5.1.3 If an asbestos string is used, do not connect the
probe to the train during the leak-check. Instead, leak-check the
train by first attaching a carbon-filled leak-check 1mp1nger (shown
1n Figure 4) to the Inlet of the filter holder (cyclone, 1f applic-
able) and then plugging the Inlet and pulling a 381-mm Hg (15-1n.
Hg) vacuum. (Again, a lower vacuum may be used, provided that it Is
not exceeded during the test.) Then, connect the probe to the train
and leak-check at about 25-mm Hg (1-1n. Hg) vacuum; alternatively,
leak-check the probe with the rest of the sampling train 1n one step
at 381-mm Hg (15-1n. Hg) vacuum. Leakage rates 1n excess of 4% of
the average sampling rate or >0.00057 m3/m1n (0.02 cfm), whichever
1s less, are unacceptable.
6.5.1.4 The following leak-check Instructions for the sampling
train described in APTD-0576 and APTD-0581 may be helpful. Start
the pump with fine-adjust valve fully open and coarse-adjust valve
completely closed. Partially open the coarse-adjust valve and
slowly close the fine-adjust valve until the desired vacuum 1s
reached. Do not reverse direction of the fine-adjust valve; this
will cause water to back up into the organic module. If the desired
vacuum 1s exceeded, either leak-check at this higher vacuum or end
the leak-check, as shown below, and start over.
0010 - 13
Revision 0
Date September 1986
B-64
-------
cross srrnnm vrrv
Lttk Ttttlng Apstrttus
2S/12 Fmlt
Kodlfttd Implrift*
with l*v«rt*4 Joint
:-Xv>XvX
.v.v.v.v.v
W.W.V.Y.
v.r.v.v.*
.v.v.v.
,v
w.v.v.v.
>>>>>>>>;
•Xv.vMv
bbbbS
am kiu
Activity Ctercaal
Figure 4. Leak-check Impinger.
0010 - 14
JB-65
Revision o
Date September 1986
-------
6.5.1.5 When the leak-check is completed, first slowly remove
the plug from the Inlet to the probe, filter holder, or cyclone (1f
applicable). When the vacuum drops to 127 mm (5 In.) Hg or less,
immediately close the coarse-adjust valve. Switch off the pumping
system and reopen the fine-adjust valve. Do not reopen the fine-
adjust valve until the coarse-adjust valve has been closed. This
prevents the water in the impingers from being forced backward Into
the organic module and silica gel from being entrained backward into
the third implnger.
6.5.2 Leak-checks during sampling run:
6.5.2.1 If, during the sampling run, a component (e.g., filter
assembly, Implnger, or sorbent trap) change becomes necessary, a
leak-check shall be conducted Immediately after the Interruption of
sampling and before the change is made. The leak-check shall be
done according to the procedure outlined 1n Paragraph 6.5.1, except
that 1t shall be done at a vacuum greater than or equal to the
maximum value recorded up to that point 1n the test. If the leakage
rate 1s found to be no greater than 0.00057 m^/mln (0.02 cfm) or AX
of the average sampling rate (whichever Is less), the results are
acceptable, and no correction will need to be applied to the total
volume of dry gas metered. If a higher leakage rate 1s obtained,
the tester shall void the sampling run. (It should be noted that
any "correction" of the sample volume by calculation by calculation
reduces the integrity of the pollutant concentrations data generated
and must be avoided.)
6.5.2.2 Immediately after a component change, and before
sampling is reinitiated, a- leak-check similar to a pre-test leak-
check must also be conducted.
6.5.3 Post-test leak-check:
6.5.3.1 A leak-check is mandatory at the conclusion of each
sampling run. The leak-check shall be done with the same procedures
^ as those with the pre-test leak-check, except that It shall be
conducted at a vacuum greater than or equal to the maximum value
reached during the sampling run. If the leakage rate 1s found to be
no greater than 0.00057 mVmln (0.02 cfm) or AX of the average
sampling rate (whichever 1s less), the results are acceptable, and
no correction need be applied to the total volume of dry gas
metered. If, however, a higher leakage rate Is obtained, the tester
shall either record the leakage rate, correct the sample volume (as
shown 1n the calculation section of this method), and consider the
data obtained of questionable reliability, or void the sampling run.
6.6 Sampling-train operation:
6.6.1 During the sampling run, maintain an Isokinetic sampling rate
to within 10% of true Isokinetic, unless otherwise specified by the
Administrator. Maintain a temperature around the filter of 120 + H*C
(248 + 25*F) and a gas temperature entering the sorbent trap at a maximum
of 20*C (68*F).
0010 - 15
Revision 0
Date September 1986
B-66
-------
6.6.2 For each runr record the data required on a data sheet such
as the one shown in Figure 5. Be sure to record the initial dry-gas
meter reading. Record the dry-gas meter readings at the beginning and
end of each sampling time increment, when changes in flow rates are made
before and after each leak-check, and when sampling is halted. Take
other readings required by Figure 5 at least once at each sample point
during each time Increment and additional readings when significant
changes (20% variation in velocity-head readings) necessitate additional
adjustments 1n flow rate. level and zero the manometer. Because the
manometer level and zero may drift due to vibrations and temperature
changes, make periodic checks during the traverse.
6.6.3 Clean the stack access ports prior to the test run to
eliminate the chance of sampling deposited material. To begin sampling,
remove the nozzle cap, verify that the filter and probe heating systems
are at the specified temperature, and verify that the pltot tube and
probe are properly positioned. Position the nozzle at the first traverse
point, with the tip pointing directly Into the gas stream. Immediately
start the pump and adjust the flow to isokinetic conditions. Nomographs,
which aid 1n the rapid adjustment of the isokinetic sampling rate without
excessive computations, are available. These nomographs are designed for
use when the Type S pitot-tube coefficient 1s 0.84 + 0.02 and the stack-
gas equivalent density (dry molecular weight) is equal to 29 + 4. APTD-
0576 details the procedure for using the nomographs. If the stack-gas
molecular weight and the pitot-tube coefficient are outside the above
ranges, do not use the nomographs unless appropriate steps (Shlgehara,
1974) are taken to compensate for the deviations.
6.6.4 When the stack 1s under significant negative pressure
(equivalent to the height of the implnger stem), take care to close the
coarse-adjust valve before Inserting the probe Into the stack, to prevent
water from backing into the organic module. If necessary, the pump may
be turned on with the coarse-adjust valve closed.
6.6.5 When the probe 1s In position, block off the openings around
the probe and stack access port to prevent unrepresentative dilution of
the gas stream.
6.6.6 Traverse the stack cross section, as required by EPA Method I
or as specified by the Administrator, being careful not to bump the probe
nozzle Into the stack walls when sampling near the walls or when removing
or inserting the probe through the access port, 1n order to minimize the
chance of extracting deposited material.
6.6.7 During the test run, make periodic adjustments to keep the
temperature around the filter holder and the organic module at the proper
levels; add more 1ce and, 1f necessary, salt to maintain a temperature of
<20*C (68*F) at the condenser/silica gel outlet. Also, periodically
check the level and zero of the manometer.
0010 - 16
Revision 0
Oate September 1986
B-67
-------
0010 -
17
B-68
Revision o
Date September 1986
-------
6.6.8 If the pressure drop across the filter or sorbent trap
becomes too high, making Isokinetic sampling difficult to maintain, the
filter/sorbent trap may be replaced in the midst of a sample run. Using
another complete filter holder/sorbent trap assembly 1s recommended,
rather than attempting to change the filter and resin themselves. After
a new f1Iter/sorbent trap assembly 1s installed, conduct a leak-check.
The total particulate weight shall Include the summation of all filter
assembly catches.
6.6.9 A single train shall be used for the entire sample run,
except in cases where simultaneous sampling Is required 1n two or more
separate ducts or at two or more different locations within the same
duct, or in cases where equipment failure necessitates a change of
trains. In all other situations, the use of two or more trains will be
subject to the approval of the Administrator.
6.6.10 Note that when two or more trains are used, separate
analysis of the front-half (If applicable) organic-module and Implnger
(1f applicable) catches from each train shall be performed, unless
identical nozzle sizes were used on all trains. In that case, the front-
half catches from the Individual trains may be combined (as may the
impinger catches), and one analysis of front-half catch and one analysis
of impinger catch may be performed.
6.6.11 At the end of the sample run, turn off the coarse-adjust
valve, remove the probe and nozzle from the stack, turn off the pump,
record the final dry-gas meter reading, and conduct a post-test leak-
check. Also, leak-check the pltot lines as described 1n EPA Method 2.
The lines must pass this leak-check 1n order to validate the velocity-
head data.
6.6.12 Calculate percent 1sok1net1city (see Section 10.8) to
determine whether the run was valid or another test run should be made.
7.0 SAMPLE RECOVERY
7.1 Preparation:
7.1.1 Proper cleanup procedure begins as soon as the probe Is
removed from the stack at the end of the sampling period. Allow the
probe to cool. When the probe can be safely handled, wipe off all
external particulate matter near the tip of the probe nozzle and place a
cap over the tip to prevent losing or gaining particulate matter. Do not
cap the probe tip tightly while the sampling train 1s cooling down
because this will create a vacuum in the filter holder, drawing water
from the Impingers Into the sorbent module.
7.1.2 Before moving the sample train to the cleanup site, remove
the probe from the sample train and cap the open outlet, being careful
not to lose any condensate that might be present. Cap the filter Inlet.
0010 - 18
B-69
Revision 0
Date September 1986
-------
Remove the umbilical cord from the last 1mp1nger and cap the 1mp1nger.
If a flexible line 1s used between the organic module and the filter
holder, disconnect the line at the filter holder and let any condensed
water or liquid drain into the organic module.
7.1.3 Cap the filter-holder outlet and the Inlet to the organic
module. Separate the sorbent trap section of the organic module from the
condensate knockout trap and the gas-conditioning section. Cap all
organic module openings. Disconnect the organic-module knockout trap
from the 1mp1nger train Inlet and cap both of these openings. Ground-
glass stoppers, Teflon caps, or caps of other Inert materials may be used
to seal all openings.
7.1.4 Transfer the probe, the filter, the organic-module
components, and the implnger/condenser assembly to the cleanup area.
This area should be clean and protected from the weather to minimize
sample contamination or loss.
7.1.5 Save a portion of all washing solutions (methanol/methylene
chloride, Type II water) used for cleanup as a blank. Transfer 200 mL of
each solution directly from the wash bottle being used and place each 1n
a separate, prelabeled glass sample container.
7.1.6 Inspect the train prior to and during disassembly and note
any abnormal conditions.
7.2 Sample containers:
7.2.1 Container no, 1: Carefully remove the filter from the filter
holder and place it 1n its Identified Petri dish container. Use a pair
or pairs of tweezers to handle the filter. If 1t 1s necessary to fold
the filter, ensure that the particulate cake 1s Inside the fold.
Carefully transfer to the Petri dish any particulate matter or filter
fibers that adhere to the filter-holder gasket, using a dry nylon bristle
brush or sharp-edged blade, or both. Label the container and seal with
l-1n.-w1de Teflon tape around the circumference of the I1d.
7.2.2 Container no. 2: Taking care that dust on the outside of the
probe or other exterior surfaces does not get Into the sample,
quantitatively recover particulate matter or any condensate from the
probe nozzle, probe fitting, probe liner, and front half of the filter
holder by washing these components first with methanol/methylene chloride
(1:1 v/v) Into a glass container. Distilled water may also be used.
Retain a water and solvent blank and analyze 1n the same manner as with
the samples. Perform rinses as follows:
7.2.2.1 Carefully remove the probe nozzle and clean the Inside
surface by rinsing with the solvent mixture (1:1 v/v methanol/-
methylene chloride) from a wash bottle and brushing with a nylon
bristle brush. Brush until the rinse shows no visible particles;
then make a final rinse of the inside surface with the solvent mix.
Brush and rinse the Inside parts of the Swagelok fitting with the
solvent mix 1n a similar way until no visible particles remain.
0010 - 19
Revision 0
Date September 1986
B-70
-------
7.2.2.2 Have two people rinse the probe Uner with the solvent
mix by tilting and rotating the probe while squirting solvent into
its upper end so that all inside surfaces will be wetted with
solvent. Let the solvent drain from the lower end into ttrt sample
container. A glass funnel may be used to aid in transferring liquid
washes to the container.
7.2.2.3 Follow the solvent rinse with a probe brush. Wld tfce
probe in an inclined position and squirt solvent Into the upper end
while pushing the probe brush through the probe with a tW15-t1n*g
action; place a sample container underneath the lower end of the
probe and catch any solvent and particulate matter that is brushed
from the probe. Run the brush through the probe three times or moret
until no visible particulate matter 1s carried out with the solvent
or until none remains in the probe Uner on visual Inspection. With
stainless steel or other metal probes, run the brush through 1n th^
above-prescribed manner at least six times (metal probes "Have small
crevices In which particulate matter can be entrapped). R1ns§..the
brush with solvent and quantitatively collect these washings 1n the
sample container. After the brushing, make a final solvent r1nse-6f
the probe as described above.
7.2.2.4 It 1s recommended that two people work together to
clean the probe to minimize sample losses. Between sampling runs,
keep brushes clean and protected from contamlnation.
7.2.2.5 Clean the Inside of the front half of the filter
holder and cyclone/cyclone flask, if used, by rubbing the surfaces»
with a nylon bristle brush and rinsing with methanol/methylene
chloride (1:1 v/v) mixture. Rinse each surface three times or more
1f needed to remove visible particulate. Make a final rinse of the
brush and filter holder. Carefully rinse out the glass cyclone and
cyclone flask (1f applicable). Brush and rinse any particulate
material adhering to the inner surfaces of these components Into the
front-half rinse sample. After all solvent washings and particulate
matter have been collected in the sample container, tighten the lid
on the sample container so that solvent will not leak out when it is
shipped to the laboratory. Mark the height of the fluid'level to=
determine whether leakage occurs during transport. Label the
container to Identify Its contents.
7.2.3 Container no. 3: The sorbent trap section of th£'organtc
module may be used as a sample transport container, or the spent restfi
may be transferred to a separate glass bottle for shipment. If the
sorbent trap Itself 1s used as the transport container, both ends should
be sealed with tightly fitting caps or plugs. Ground-glass stoppers or
Teflon caps may be used. The sorbent trap should then be labeled";
covered with aluminum foil, and packaged on ice for transport to the
laboratory. If a separate bottle 1s used, the spent resin shdald.be
quantitatively transferred from the trap into the clean bottle. R65ln
that adheres to the walls of the trap should be recovered using a rubber
policeman or spatula and added to this bottle.
0010 - 20
Revision 0
Date September 1986
B-71
-------
7.2.4 Container no. 4: Measure the volume of condensate collected
in the condensate knockout section of the organic module to within +1 ml.
by using a graduated cylinder or by weighing to within +0.5 g using a
triple-beam balance. Record the volume or weight of liquid present and
note any discoloration or film 1n the liquid catch. Transfer this liquid
to a prelabeled glass sample container. Inspect the back half of the
filter housing and the gas-condit1on1ng section of the organic module.
If condensate is observed, transfer it to a graduated or weighing bottle
and measure the volume, as described above. Add this material to the
condensate knockout-trap catch.
7.2.5 Container no. 5: All sampling train components located
between the h1gh-eff1c1ency glass- or quartz-fiber filter and the first
wet implnger or the final condenser system (Including the heated Teflon
line connecting the filter outlet to the condenser) should be thoroughly
rinsed with methanol/methylene chloride (1:1 v/v) and the rinsings
combined. This rinse shall be separated from the condensate. If the
spent resin 1s transferred from the sorbent trap to a separate sample
container for transport, the sorbent trap shall be thoroughly rinsed
until all sample-wetted surfaces appear clean. Visible films should be
removed by brushing. Whenever train components are brushed, the brush
should be subsequently rinsed with solvent mixture and the rinsings added
to this container.
7.2.6 Container no. 6: Note the color of the Indicating silica gel
to determine 1f it has been completely spent and make a notation of Its
condition. Transfer the silica gel from the fourth Implnger to Its
original container and seal. A funnel may make It easier to pour the
silica gel without spilling. A rubber policeman may be used as an aid 1n
removing the silica gel from the implnger. It 1s not necessary to remove
the small amount of dust particles that may adhere strongly to the
Implnger wall. Because the gain 1n weight 1s to be used for moisture
calculations, do not use any water or other liquids to transfer the
silica gel. If a balance 1s available in the field, weigh the container
and its contents to 0.5 g or better.
7.3 Implnger water:
7.3.1 Make a notation of any color or film 1n the liquid catch.
Measure the liquid 1n the first three implngers to within +1 mL by using
a graduated cylinder or by weighing 1t to within +0.5 g by using a
balance (1f one Is available). Record the volume or weight of liquid
present. This Information Is required to calculate the moisture content
of the effluent gas.
7.3.2 Discard the liquid after measuring and recording the volume
or weight, unless analysis of the Implnger catch is required (see
Paragraph 4.1.3.7). Amber glass containers should be used for storage of
implnger catch. If required.
7.3.3 If a different type of condenser 1s used, measure the amount
of moisture condensed either volumetrlcally or gravlmetrically.
0010 - 21
B-72
Revision 0
Oate September 1986
t
-------
7.4 Sample preparation for shipment: Prior to shipment, recheck all
sample containers to ensure that the caps are well secured. Seal the 1 Ids of
all containers around the circumference with Teflon tape. Ship all liquid
samples upright on 1ce and all particulate filters with the particulate catch
facing upward. The particulate filters should be shipped unrefrlgerated.
8.0 ANALYSIS
8.1 Sample preparation:
8.1.1 General: The preparation steps for all samples will result
1n a finite volume of concentrated solvent. The final sample volume
(usually In the 1- to 10-mL range) is then subjected to analysis by
6C/MS. All samples should be inspected and the appearance documented.
All samples are to be spiked with surrogate standards as received from
the field prior to any sample manipulations. The spike should be at a
level equivalent to 10 times the MDL when the solvent 1s reduced 1n
volume to the desired level (I.e., 10 mL). The spiking compounds should
be the stable isotoplcally labeled analog of the compounds of Interest or
a compound that would exhibit properties similar to the compounds of
Interest, be easily chromatographed, and not Interfere with the analysis
of the compounds of Interest. Suggested surrogate spiking compounds are:
deuterated naphthalene, chrysene, phenol, nitrobenzene, chlorobenzene,
toluene, and carbon-13-1abeled pentachlorophenol.
8.1.2 Condensate: The "condensate" 1s the moisture collected 1n
the first 1mp1nger following the XAD-2 module. Spike the condensate with
the surrogate standards. The volume Is measured and recorded and then
transferred to a separatory funnel. The pH 1s to be adjusted to pH 2
with 6 N sulfuric acid, If necessary. The sample container and graduated
cylinder are sequentially rinsed with three successive 10-mL allquots of
the extraction solvent and added to the separatory funnel. The ratio of
solvent to aqueous sample should be maintained at 1:3. Extract the
sample by vigorously shaking the separatory funnel for 5 m1n. After
complete separation of the phases, remove the solvent and transfer to a
Kuderna-Danlsh concentrator (K-D), filtering through a bed of precleaned,
dry sodium sulfate. Repeat the extraction step two additional times.
Adjust the pH to 11 with 6 N sodium hydroxide and reextract combining the
acid and base extracts. Rinse the sodium sulfate into the K-0 with fresh
solvent and discard the deslccant. Add Teflon boiling chips and
concentrate to 10 mL by reducing the volume to slightly less than 10 mL
and then bringing to volume with fresh solvent. In order to achieve the
necessary detection limit, the sample volume can be further reduced to 1
mL by using a micro column K-D or nitrogen blow-down. Should the sample
start to exhibit precipitation, the concentration step should be stopped
and the sample redlssolved with fresh solvent taking the volume to some
finite amount. After adding a standard (for the purpose of quantitation
by GC/MS), the sample 1s ready for analysis, as discussed 1n Paragraph
8.2.
0010 - 22
Revision 0
Date September 1986
B-73
-------
8.1.3 Iraplnger: Spike the sample with the surrogate standards;
measure and record the volume and transfer to a separatory funnel.
Proceed as described 1n Paragraph 8.1.2.
8.1.4 XAD-2: Spike the resin directly with the surrogate
standards. Transfer the resin to the all-glass thimbles by the following
procedure (care should be taken so as not to contaminate the thimble by
touching 1t with anything other than tweezers or other solvent-rinsed
mechanical holding devices). Suspend the XAD-2 module directly over the
thimble. The glass frit of the module (see Figure 2) should be 1n the up
position. The thimble 1s contained 1n a clean beaker, which will serve
to catch the solvent rinses. Using a Teflon squeeze bottle, flush the
XAD-2 into the thimble. Thoroughly rinse the glass module with solvent
Into the beaker containing the thimble. Add the XAD-2 glass-wool plug to
the thimble. Cover the XAD-2 In the thimble with a precleaned glass-wool
plug sufficient to prevent the resin from floating into the solvent
reservoir of the extractor. If the resin 1s wet, effective extraction
can be accomplished by loosely packing the resin 1n the thimble. If a
question arises concerning the completeness of the extraction, a second
extraction, without a spike, Is advised. The thimble 1s placed 1n the
extractor and the rinse solvent contained 1n the beaker is added to the
solvent reservoir. Additional solvent 1s added to make the reservoir
approximately two-thirds full. Add Teflon boiling chips and assemble the
apparatus. Adjust the heat source to cause the extractor to cycle 5-6
times per hr. Extract the resin for 16 hr. Transfer the solvent and
three 10-mL rinses of the reservoir to a K-D and concentrate as described
In Paragraph 8.1.2.
8.1.5 Particulate filter (and cyclone catch): If particulate
loading is to be determined, weigh the filter (and cyclone catch, 1f
applicable). The particulate filter (and cyclone catch, if applicable)
is transferred to the glass thimble and extracted simultaneously with the
XAD-2 resin.
8.1.6 Train solvent rinses: All train rinses (I.e., probe,
Implnger, filter housing) using the extraction solvent and methanol are
returned to the laboratory as a single sample. If the rinses are
contained in more than one container, the intended spike is divided
equally among the containers proportioned from a single syringe volume.
Transfer the rinse to a separatory funnel and add a sufficient amount of
organic-free water so that the methylene chloride becomes immiscible and
its volume no longer Increases with the addition of more water. The
extraction and concentration steps are then performed as described in
Paragraph 8.1,2.
8.2 Sample analysis:
8.2.1 The primary analytical tool for the measurement of emissions
from hazardous waste incinerators is GC/MS using fused-slHca capillary
GC columns, as described in Method 8270 in Chapter Four of this manual.
Because of the nature of GC/MS instrumentation and the cost associated
0010 - 23
Revision
Date September 1986
B-74
-------
with sample analysis, prescreenlng of the sample extracts by gas
chromatography/flame Ionization detection (GC/FID) or with electron
capture (GC/ECD) Is encouraged. Information regarding the complexity and
concentration level of a sample prior to GC/MS analysis can be of
enormous help. This Information can be obtained by using either
capillary columns or less expensive packed columns. However, the FID
screen should be performed with a column similar to that used with the
GC/MS. Keep 1n mind that GC/FID has a slightly lower detection limit
than GC/HS and, therefore, that the concentration of the sample can be
adjusted either up or down prior to analysis by GC/MS.
8.2.2 The mass spectrometer will be operated in a full scan (40-
450) mode for most of the analyses. The range for which data are
acquired 1n a GC/MS run will be sufficiently broad to encompass the major
Ions, as listed in Chapter Four, Method 8270, for each of the designated
POHCs in an Incinerator effluent analysis.
8.2.3 For most purposes, electron ionization (EI) spectra will be
collected because a majority of the POHCs give reasonable EI spectra.
Also, EI spectra are compatible with the NBS Library of Mass Spectra and
other mass spectral references, which aid 1n the identification process
for other components 1n the incinerator process streams.
8.2.4 To clarify some identifications, chemical Ionization (CI)
spectra using either positive ions or negative Ions will be used to
elucidate molecular-weight information and simplify the fragmentation
patterns of some compounds. In no case, however, should CI spectra alone
be used for compound identification. Refer to Chapter Four, Method 8270,
for complete descriptions of GC conditions, MS conditions, and
quantitative and quantitative Identification.
9.0 CALIBRATION
9.1 Probe nozzle: Probe nozzles shall be calibrated before their
initial use In the field. Using a micrometer, measure the Inside diameter of
the nozzle to the nearest 0.025 mm (0,001 in.). Make measurements at three
separate places across the diameter and obtain the average of the
measurements. The difference between the high and low numbers shall not
exceed 0.1 mm (0.004 In.). When nozzles become nicked, dented, or corroded,
they shall be reshaped, sharpened, and recalibrated before use. Each nozzle
shall be permanently and uniquely identified.
9.2 P1tot tube; The Type S pltot tube assembly shall be calibrated
according to the procedure outlined 1n Section 4 of EPA Method 2, or assigned
a nominal coefficient of 0.84 if 1t Is not visibly nicked, dented, or corroded
and if it meets design and Intercomponent spacing specifications.
0010 - 24
Revision 0
Date September 1986
B-75
-------
9.3 Metering system:
9.3.1 Before its initial use in the field, the metering system
shall be calibrated according to the procedure outlined 1n APTD-0576.
Instead of physically adjusting the dry-gas meter dial readings to
correspond to the wet-test meter readings, calibration factors may be
used to correct the gas meter dial readings mathematically to the proper
values. Before calibrating the metering system, it is suggested that a
leak-check be conducted. For metering systems having diaphragm pumps,
the normal leak-check procedure will not detect leakages within the pump.
For these cases the following leak-check procedure is suggested: Hake a
10-min calibration run at 0.00C57 m^/min (0.02 cfm); at the end of the
run, take the difference of the measured wet-test and dry-gas meter
volumes and divide the difference by 10 to get the leak rate. The leak
rate should not exceed 0.00057 m^/mln (0.02 cfm).
9.3.2 After each field use, the calibration of the metering system
shall be checked by performing three calibration runs at a single
intermediate orifice setting (based on the previous field test). The
vacuum shall be set at the maximum value reached during the test series.
To adjust the vacuum, insert a valve between the wet-test meter and the
Inlet of the metering system. Calculate the average value of the
calibration factor. If the calibration has changed by more than 5i,
recalibrate the meter over the full range of orifice settings, as
outlfned in APTD-0576.
9.3.3 Leak-check of metering system: That portion of the sampling
train from the pump to the orifice meter (see Figure 1) should be leak-
checked prior to initial use and after each shipment. Leakage after the
pump will result 1n less volume being recorded than Is actually sampled.
The following procedure 1s suggested (see Figure 6): Close the main
valve on the meter box. Insert a one-hole rubber stopper with rubber
tubing attached Into the orifice exhaust pipe. Disconnect and vent the
low side of the orifice manometer. Close off the low side orifice tap.
Pressurize the system to 13-18 cm (5-7 In.) water column by blowing Into
the rubber tubing. Pinch off the tubing and observe the manometer for 1
mln. A loss of pressure on the manometer indicates a leak 1n the meter
box. Leaks, 1f present, must be corrected.
NOTE: If the dry-gas-meter coefficient values obtained before and after
a test series differ by >5%, either the test series shall be
voided or calculations for test series shall be performed using
whichever meter coefficient value (I.e., before or after) gives
the lower value of total sample volume.
9.4 Probe heater: The probe-heating system shall be calibrated before
its initial use in the field according to the procedure outlined 1n APTD-0576.
Probes constructed according to APTD-0581 need not be calibrated If the
calibration curves 1n APTD-0576 are used.
0010 - 25
Revision 0
Date September 1986
B-76
-------
RUBBER ORIFICE
VACUUM
GAUGE
w
I
-J
o
o
t-*
0
1
ro
cr»
0 TO
q* n
<
-»•
(/>
to O
ft 3
fo
r*
fD
g
01
a>
-j
RUBBER i
TUBING i /
£A
STOPPER
¦IOWINTO TUIINC
UNTIL MAHOMdtR
MAOSSTO 1 INCHfl
WATIB COLUMN
C10SC0
ORIFICf
MANOMETIH
BY PASS VALVE
VENT
MAIN VALVE CLOSED
DRY TEST
METER
AIR TIGHT
PUMP
Figure 6. Leak check of meter box.
-------
9.5 Temperature gauges: Each thermocouple must be permanently and
uniquely marked on the casting; all mercury-1n-glass reference thermometers
must conform to ASTM E-l 63C or 63F specifications. Thermocouples should be
calibrated 1n the laboratory with and without the use of extension leads. If
extension leads are used 1n the f1eldf the thermocouple readings at ambient
air temperatures, with and without the extension lead, must be noted and
recorded. Correction is necessary If the use of an extension lead produces a
change >1.5%.
9.5.1 Implnger, organic module, and dry-gas meter thermocouples:
For the thermocouples used to measure the temperature of the gas leaving
the implnger train and the XAD-2 resin bed, three-point calibration at
1ce-water, room-a1r, and boiling-water temperatures 1s necessary. Accept
the thermocouples only 1f the readings at all three temperatures agree to
+2*C (3.6*F) with those of the absolute value of the reference
thermometer.
9.5.2 Probe and stack thermocouple: For the thermocouples used to
indicate the probe and stack temperatures, a three-point calibration at
1ce-water, boiling-water, and hot-o1l-bath temperatures must be
performed; it Is recommended that room-a1r temperature be added, and that
the thermometer and the thermocouple agree to within 1.5X at each of the
calibration points. A calibration curve (equation) may be constructed
(calculated) and the data extrapolated to cover the entire temperature
range suggested by the manufacturer.
9.6 Barometer: Adjust the barometer Initially and before each test
series to agree to within +25 mm Hg (0.1 1n. Hg) of the mercury barometer or
the corrected barometric pressure value reported by a nearby National Weather
Service Station (same altitude above sea level).
9.7 Triple-beam balance: Calibrate the triple-beam balance before each
test series, using Class-S standard weights; the weights must be within +0.5%
of the standards, or the balance must be adjusted to meet these limits.
10.0 CALCULATIONS
10.1 Carry out calculations. Round off figures after the final
calculation to the correct number of significant figures.
10.2 Nomenclature:
An = Cross-sectional area of nozzle, m^ (ft^).
Bws = Water vapor In the gas stream, proportion by volume.
cd = Type S pltot tube coefficient (nominally 0.84 + 0.02),
dlmenslonless.
I = Percent of isokinetic sampling.
0010 - 27
Revision 0
Date September 1986
B-78
-------
La = Maximum acceptable leakage rate for a leak-check, either pre-test
or following a component change; equal to 0.00057 m^/mln {0.02
cfm) or 4% of the average sampling rate, whichever is less.
l_i » Individual leakage rate observed during the leak-check conducted
prior to the "1t"" component change (1 = 1, 2, 3...n) m^/mln
(cfm).
Ld = Leakage rate observed during the post-test leak-check, nvVmin
(cfm).
M
-------
/jw = Density of water, 0.9982 g/mL (0.002201 Ib/mL).
0 = Total sampling time, min.
01 = Sampling time Interval from the beginning of a run until the
first component change, min.
8I = Sampling time interval between two successive component
changes, beginning with the interval between the first and
second changes, min.
0p = Sampling time interval from the final (n^) component change
until the end of the sampling run, m1n.
13.6 = Specific gravity of mercury.
60 = sec/mln.
100 a Conversion to percent.
10.3 Average dry-gas-meter temperature and average orifice pressure
drop: See data sheet (Figure 5, above). 1
10.4 Ory-qas volume: Correct the sample measured by the dry-gas meter
to standard conditions [20'C, 760 mm Hg [68*F, 29.92 1n. HgJ) by using
Equation 1:
Tstd W"'13-6 ' W"'13-6
v-(«td) ¦ V — — : <»
'm ^std 'm
where:
K\ = 0.3858 K/mm Hg for metric units, or
Kj = 17.64*R/in. Hg for English units.
It should be noted that Equation 1 can be used as written, unless the leakage
rate observed during any of the mandatory leak-checks (I.e., the post-test
leak-check or leak-checks conducted prior to component changes) exceeds La.
If Lp or l\ exceeds La, Equation 1 must be modified as follows:
a« Case 1 (no component changes made during sampling run): Replace Vm
in Equation 1 with the expression:
Vm - (Lp - La>
0010 - 29
Revision 0
Date September 1986
B-80
-------
b. Case II (one or more component changes made during the sampling
run): Replace Vm in Equation 1 by the expression:
«„ - <4 - La)8, • f (L, - ge, • |LP - La)0p
and substitute only for those leakage rates (l_i or Lp) that exceed
La-
10.5 Volume of water vapor:
Pw RTstd
Vw(std) = Vlc - — - K2 ^ (2)
w std
where:
K2 = 0.001333 m3/ml_ for metric units, or
Kg = 0.04707 ft3/mL for English units.
10.6 Moisture content:
^w(std)
Bws = (3>
Vm(std) + Vw(std)
NOTE: In saturated or water-droplet-laden gas streams, two calculations
of the moisture content of the stack gas shall be made, one from
the implnger analysis (Equation 3) and a second from the
assumption of saturated conditions. The lower of the two values
of B* shall be considered correct. The procedure for determining
the moisture content based upon assumption of saturated conditions
1s given 1n the Note to Section 1.2 of Method 4. For the purposes
of this method, the average stack-gas temperature from Figure 6
may be used to make this determination, provided that the accuracy
of the 1n-stack temperature sensor 1s +1*C (2*F).
10.7 Conversion factors:
From To Multiply by
sc-
if? 0.02832
g/ft3 gr/ft3 15.43
g/ft3 lb/ft3 2.205 x 10"3
g/ft3 g/m3 35.31
0010 - 30
B-81
Revision 0
Date September 1986
-------
10.8 Isokinetic variation:
10.8.1 Calculation fro® raw data:
10° Ts[K3F1c ~ (Vn/Tm) (Pbar ~ AH/13.6)]
(4)
where:
K3 = 0.003454 mm Hg-m3/mL-K for metric units, or
K3 = 0.002669 1n. Hg-ft3/mL-*R for English units.
10.8.2 Calculation for intermediate values:
TsVn,(std)Pstd100
= Tst>s8AnPs60^-Bws^
std s n s
(5)
where:
K4 = 4.320 for metric units, or
K4 = 0.09450 for English units.
10.8.3 Acceptable results: If 90X <£ I £ 11 OX, the results are
acceptable. If the results are low In comparison with the standard and
I 1s beyond the acceptable range, or 1f I 1s less than 90X, the
Administrator may opt to accept the results.
10.9 To determine the minimum sample volume that shall be collected, the
following sequence of calculations shall be used.
10.9.1 From prior analysis of the waste feed, the concentration of
POHCs introduced Into the combustion system can be calculated. The
degree of destruction and removal efficiency that is required is used to
determine the maximum amount of P0HC allowed to be present 1n the
effluent. This may be expressed as:
(WF) (P0HC> cone) (100-XDRE)
= Max P0HC, Mass
(6)
100
100
where:
WF = mass flow rate of waste feed per hr, g/hr (lb/hr).
POHC1 = concentration of Principal Organic Hazardous Compound (wt X)
introduced into the combustion process.
0010 - 31
Revision 0
Date September 1986
B-82
-------
DRE = percent Destruction and Removal Efficiency required.
Max POHC = mass flow rate (g/hr [lb/hr]) of POHC emitted from the
combustion source.
10.9.2 The average discharge concentration of the POHC 1n the
effluent gas 1s determined by comparing the Max POHC with the volumetric
flow rate being exhausted from the source. Volumetric flow rate data are
available as a result of preliminary Method 1-4 determinations:
Max POHCj Mass
- Max POHC, cone (7)
DVeff(std)
where:
0Veff(std) = volumetric flow rate of exhaust gas, dscm (dscf).
POHCi cone = anticipated concentration of the POHC 1n the
exhaust gas stream, g/dscm (lb/dscf).
10.9.3 In making this calculation, 1t 1s recommended that a safety
margin of at least ten be Included:
LDLPOHC x 10
POHC,
1 cone
" VTBC ^
where:
LDLpQHC = detectable amount of POHC In entire sampling train.
NOTE: The whole extract from an XA0-2 cartridge is seldom 1f ever,
Injected at once. Therefore, 1f allquotlng factors are
Involved, the LDLpnuc not the same as the analytical (or
column) detection limit.
Vjbc = minimum dry standard volume to be collected at dry-gas
meter.
10.10 Concentration of any given POHC in the gaseous emissions of a
combustion process:
1) Multiply the concentration of the POHC as determined in Method 8270
by the final concentration volume, typically 10 mL.
CpoHC (ug/mL) x sample volume (mL) = amount (ug) of POHC In sample (9)
0010 - 32
B-83
Revision 0
Date September 1986
o
-------
where:
CpOHC E concentration of POHC as analyzed by Method 8270.
2) Sum the amount of POHC found 1n all samples associated with a single
train.
Total (ug) = XAD-2 (ug) + condensate (ug) + rinses (ug) + Implnger (ug) (10)
3) Divide the total ug found by the volume of stack gas sampled (m^).
(Total ug)/(tra1n sample volume) = concentration of POHC (ug/m^) (11)
11.0 QUALITY CONTROL
11.1 SamplIng: See EPA Manual 600/4-77-027b for Method 5 quality
control.
11.2 Analysis: The quality assurance program required for this study
includes the analysis of field and method blanks, procedure validations,
Incorporation of stable labeled surrogate compounds, quantitation versus
stable labeled Internal standards, capillary column performance checks, and
external performance tests. The surrogate spiking compounds selected for a
particular analysis are used as primary Indicators of the quality of the
analytical data for a wide range of compounds and a variety of sample
matrices. The assessment of combustion data, positive Identification, and
quantitation of the selected compounds are dependent on the integrity of the
samples received and the precision and accuracy of the analytical methods
employed. The quality assurance procedures for this method are designed to
monitor the performance of the analytical method and to provide the required
information to take corrective action 1f problems are observed in laboratory
operations or In field sampling activities.
11.2.1 Field Blanks: Field blanks must be submitted with the
samples collected at each sampling site. The field blanks include the
sample bottles containing allquots of sample recovery solvents, unused
filters, and resin cartridges. At a minimum, one complete sampling train
will be assembled 1n the field staging area, taken to the sampling area,
and leak-checked at the beginning and end of the testing (or for the same
total number of times as the actual test train). The filter housing and
probe of the blank train will be heated during the sample test. The
train will be recovered as if 1t were an actual test sample. No gaseous
sample will be passed through the sampling train.
11.2.2 Method blanks: A method blank must be prepared for each set
of analytical operations, to evaluate contamination and artifacts that
can be derived from glassware, reagents, and sample handling 1n the
laboratory.
11.2.3 Refer to Method 8270 for additional quality control
considerations.
0010 - 33
B-84
Revision 0
Date September 1986
-------
12.0 METHOD PERFORMANCE
12.1 Method performance evaluation: Evaluation of analytical procedures
for a selected series of compounds must include the sample-preparation
procedures and each associated analytical determination. The analytical
procedures should be chall2nged by the test compounds spiked at appropriate
levels and carried through the procedures.
12.2 Method detection limit: The overall method detection limits (lower
and upper) must be determined on a compound-by-compound basis because
different compounds may exhibit different collection, retention, and
extraction efficiencies as well as instrumental minimum detection limit (MDL).
The method detection limit must be quoted relative to a given sample volume.
The upper limits for the method must be determined relative to compound
retention volumes (breakthrough).
12.3 Method precision and bias: The overall method precision and bias
must be determined on a compound-by-compound basis at a given concentration
level. The method precision value would include a combined variability due to
sampling, sample preparation, and Instrumental analysis. The method bias
would be dependent upon the collection, retention, and extraction efficiency
of the train components. From evaluation studies to date using a dynamic
spiking system, method biases of -13X and -16X have been determined for
toluene and 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane, respectively. A precision of 19.9S was
calculated from a field test data set representing seven degrees of freedom
which resulted from a series of paired, unsplked Semlvolatlle Organic Sampling
trains (Senl-VOST) sampling emissions from a hazardous waste incinerator.
13.0 REFERENCES
1. Addendum to Specifications for Incinerator Testing at Federal Facilities,
PHS, NCAPC, December 6, 1967.
2. Bursey, J.f Homolya, J., McAllister, R., and McGangley, J., Laboratory
and Field Evaluation of the Sem1-V0ST Method, Vols. 1 and 2, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/4-851/075A, 075B (1985).
3. Martin, R.M., Construction Details of Isokinetic Source-Sampling
Equipment, Research Triangle Park, NC, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
April 1971, PB-203 060/BE, APTD-0581, 35 pp.
4. Rom, J.J., Maintenance, Calibration, and Operation of Isokinetic Source-
Sampling Equipment, Research Triangle Park, NC, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, March 1972, PB-209 022/BE, APT0-0576, 39 pp.
5. Schlickenrieder, L.M., Adams, J.W., and Thrun, K.E., Modified Method 5
Train and Source Assessment Sampling System: Operator's Manual, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/8-85/003, (1985).
0010 - 34
B-85
Revision 0
Date September 1986
-------
6. Shlgehara, R.T., Adjustments 1n the EPA Nomography for Different P1tot
Tube Coefficients and Dry Molecular Weights, Stack Sampling Newsr 2:4-11
(October 1974).
7. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, CFR 40 Part 60, Appendix A, Methods
1-5.
8. Vollaro, R.F., A Survey of Commercially Available Instrumentation for the
Measurement of Low-Range Gas Velocities, Research Triangle Park, NC, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Emissions Measurement Branch, November 1976
(unpublished paper).
0010 - 35
B-86
Revision 0
Date September 1986
*
-------
METHOD 0010, APPENDIX A
PREPARATION OF XAD-2 SORBENT RESIN
1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION
1.1 XAD-2 resin as supplied by the manufacturer is impregnated with a
bicarbonate solution to Inhibit microbial growth during storage. Both the
salt solution and any residual extractable monomer and polymer species must be
removed before use. The resin 1s prepared by a series of water and organic
extractions, followed by careful drying.
2.0 EXTRACTION
2.1 Method 1: The procedure may be carried out in a giant Soxhlet
extractor. An all-glass thimble containing an extra-coarse frit 1s used for
extraction of XAD-2. The frit 1s recessed 10-15 mm above a crenellated ring
at the bottom of the thimble to facilitate drainage. The resin must be
carefully retained in the extractor cup with a glass-wool plug and stainless
steel screen because 1t floats on methylene chloride. This process Involves
sequential extraction 1n the following order.
Solvent Procedure
Water Initial rinse: Place resin In a beaker,
rinse once with Type II water, and
discard. Fill with water a second time,
let stand overnight, and discard.
Water
Methyl alcohol
Methylene chloride
Methylene chloride (fresh)
2.2 Method 2:
Extract with H£0 for 8 hr,
Extract for 22 hr.
Extract for 22 hr.
Extract for 22 hr.
2.2.1 As an alternative to Soxhlet extraction, a continuous
extractor has been fabricated for the extraction sequence. This extractor has
been found to be acceptable. The particular canister used for the apparatus
shown 1n Figure A-l contains about 500 g of finished XAD-2. Any size may be
constructed; the choice 1s dependent on the needs of the sampling programs.
The XAD-2 1s held under light spring tension between a pair of coarse and fine
screens. Spacers under the bottom screen allow for even distribution of clean
solvent. The three-necked flask should be of sufficient size (3-l1ter 1n this
case) to hold solvent
0010 - A - 1
Revision 0
Date September 1986
B-87
-------
DtaBUts T«ka off
OC3 em x 0J2 cm Union
(1/4 x 1/1 InJ
CL32 cm (t/B in) Ttflon
w Tubing
a
Flow
(L32 en Union
Figure A-l. XAD-2 cleanup extraction apparatus.
0010 - A - 2
B-88
Revision 0
Date September 1986
-------
equal to twice the dead volume of the XAD-2 canister. Solvent Is refluxed
through the Snyder column, and the distillate is continuously cycled up
through the XAD-2 for extraction and returned to the flask. The flow 1s
maintained upward through the XAD-2 to allow naxlnum solvent contact and
prevent channeling. A valve at the bottom of the canister allows removal of
solvent from the canister between changes.
2.2.2 Experience has shown that 1t 1s very difficult to cycle
sufficient water In this mode. Therefore the aqueous rinse 1s accomplished by
singly flushing the canister with about 20 liters of distilled water. A snail
pump may be useful for pumping the water through the canister. The water
extraction should be carried out at the rate of about 20-40 nL/nin.
2.2.3 After draining the water, subsequent methyl alcohol and
methylene chloride extractions are carried out using the refluxlng apparatus.
An overnight or 10- to 20-hr period Is normally sufficient for each
extraction.
2.2.4 All materials of construction are glass. Teflon, or stainless
steel. Punps, 1f used, should not contain extractable materials. Punps are
not used with methanol and methylene chloride.
3.0 DRYING
3.1 After evaluation of several methods of removing residual solvent, a
fluldlzed-bed technique has proved to be the fastest and most reliable drying
method.
3.2 A simple column with suitable retainers, as shown In Figure A-2,
will serve as a satisfactory column. A 10.2-ai (4-1n-) Pyrex pipe 0.6 m (2
ft) long will hold all of the XAD-2 from the extractor shown in Figure A-l or
the Soxhlet extractor, with sufficient space for fluldlzing the bed while
generating a minimum resin load at the exit of the column*
3.3 Kethodl: The gas used to remove the solvent Is the key to
preserving the cleanliness of the XAD-2. Liquid nitrogen from a standard
cotroerclal liquid nitrogen cylinder has routinely proved to be a reliable
source of large volumes of gas free from organic contaminants. The liquid
nitrogen cylinder is connected to the column by a length of precleaned 0.95-an
(3/8-ln.) copper tubing, colled to pass through a heat source* As nitrogen Is
bled from the cylinder, It Is vaporized In the heat source and passes through
the column. A convenient heat source is a water bath heated from a steam
line. The final nitrogen temperature should only be warm to the touch and not
over 40*C. £xperience has shown that about 500 g of XAD-2 may be dried
overnight by consuming a full 160-liter cylinder of liquid nitrogen.
3.4 Method 2: As a second choice, high-purity tank nitrogen may be used
to dry the XAD-2. The high-purity nitrogen must first be passed through a bed
0010 - A - 3
B-89
Revision 0
Date September 1986
-------
Loom Wttrt Nylon
Ptfaric Cow
102 cm
(4 Inch) Fy?i*
P\p*
Liquid Tik«off
0J5 cm (3/8 in} Tubiflf
IPS
i
LJ^uid NJtm^in
Cyiindtr
Cliot]
Hm Seure*
P«f*t
WU Swppe
Figure A-2. XAQ-2 fluidlzed-bed drying apparatus.
0010 - A - 4
B-90
Revision 0
Date September 1986
-------
of activated charcoal approximately 150 ml 1n volume. With either type of
drying method, the rate of flow should gently agitate the bed. Excessive
flu1d1zat1on may cause the particles to break up.
4.0 QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES
4.1 For both Methods 1 and 2, the quality control results must be
reported for the batch.. The batch must be reextracted 1f the residual
extractable organlcs are >20 ug/mL by TCO analysis or the gravimetric residue
is >0.5 mg/20 g XAD-2 extracted. (See also section 5.1, Method 0010.)
4.2 Four control procedures are used with the final XAD-2 to check for
(1) residual methylene chloride, (2) extractable organlcs (TCO), (3) specific
compounds of Interest as determined by GC/MS, as described In Section 4.5
below, and (4) residue (GRAV).
4.3 Procedure for residual methylene chloride:
4.3.1 Description: A 1+0.1-g sample of dried resin 1s weighed Into
a small v1alr 3 mL of toluene are added, and the vial Is capped and well
shaken. Five uL of toluene (now containing extracted methylene chloride) are
Injected Into a gas chromatograph, and the resulting Integrated area Is
compared with a reference standard. The reference solution consists of 2.5 uL
of methylene chloride 1n 100 mL of toluene, simulating 100 ug of residual
methylene chloride on the resin. The acceptable maximum content 1s 1,000 ug/g
resin.
4.3.2 Experimental: The gas chromatograph conditions are as
follows:
6-ft x 1/8-1n. stainless steel column containing 10X 0V-101 on
100/120 Supelcoport;
Helium carrier at 30 mL/m1n;
FID operated on 4 x 10~H A/mV;
Injection port temperature: 250*C;
Detector temperature: 305*C;
Program: 30*C(4 m1n) 40*C/m1n 250*C (hold); and
Program terminated at 1,000 sec.
4.4 Procedure for residual extractable organlcs:
4.4.1 Description: A 20+0.1-g sample of cleaned, dried resin 1s
weighed into a precleaned alundum or cellulose thimble which Is plugged with
cleaned glass wool. (Note that 20 g of resin will fill a thimble, and the
0010 - A - 5
Revision 0
Date September 1986
B-91
-------
resin will float out unless well plugged.) The thimble containing the resin
1s extracted for 24 hr with 200-raL of pesticide- grade methylene chloride
(Burdlck and Jackson pesticide-grade or equivalent purity). The 200-mL
extract 1s reduced 1n volume to 10-mL using a Kuderna-Danlsh concentrator
and/or a nitrogen evaporation stream. Five uL of that solution are analyzed
by gas chromatography using the TCO analysis procedure. The concentrated
solution should not contain >20 ug/mL of TCO extracted from the XAD-2. This
Is equivalent to 10 ug/g of TCO 1n the XAD-2 and would correspond to 1.3 mg of
TCO in the extract of the 130-g XAD-2 module. Care should be taken to correct
the TCO data for a solvent blank prepared (200 mL reduced to 10 ml) In a
similar manner.
4.4.2 Experimental: Use the TCO analysis conditions described 1n
the revised Level 1 manual (EPA 600/7-78-201).
4.5 GC/MS Screen: The extract, as prepared 1n paragraph 4.4,1, is
subjected to GC/MS analysis for each of the Individual compounds of Interest.
The GC/MS procedure Is described 1n Chapter Four, Method 8270. The extract 1s
screened at the MDL of each compound. The presence of any compound at a
concentration >25 ug/mL in the concentrated extract will require the XAD-2 to
be recleaned by repeating the methylene chloride step.
4.6 Methodology for residual gravimetric determination: After the TCO
value and GC/MS data are obtained for the resin batch by the above procedures,
dry the remainder of the extract 1n a tared vessel. There must be <0.5 rag
residue registered or the batch of resin will have to be extracted with fresh
methylene chloride again until It meets this criterion. This level
corresponds to 25 ug/g 1n the XAD-2, or about 3.25 mg In a resin charge of
130 g.
0010 - A - 6
B-92
Revision 0
Date September 1986
-------
METHOD 0030
VOLATILE ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN
1.0 PRINCIPLE AND APPLICATION
1.1 Principle
1.1.1 This method describes the collection of volatile principal
organic hazardous constituents (POHCs) from the stack gas effluents of
hazardous waste incinerators. For the purpose of definition, volatile
POHCs are those POHCs with boiling points less than 100*C. If the
boiling point of a POHC of Interest 1s less than 30*C, the POHC may break
through the sorbent under the conditions of the sample collection
procedure.
1.1.2 Field application for POHCs of this type should be supported
by laboratory data which demonstrate the efficiency of a volatile organic
sampling train (VOST) to collect POHCs with boiling points less than
30*C. This may require using reduced sample volumes collected at flow
rates between 250 and 500 mL/mln. Many compounds which boll above 100*C
(e.g., chlorobenzene) may also be efficiently collected and analyzed
using this method. VOST collection efficiency for these compounds should
be demonstrated, where necessary, by laboratory data of the type
described above.
1.1.3 This method employs a 20-l1ter sample of effluent gas
containing volatile POHCs which Is withdrawn from a gaseous effluent
source at a flow rate of 1 L/mln, using a glass-Hned probe and a
volatile organic sampling train (VOST). (Operation of the VOST under
these conditions has been called FAST-V0ST.) The gas stream 1s cooled to
20*C by passage through a water-cooled condenser and volatile POHCs are
collected on a pair of sorbent resin traps. Liquid condensate 1s
collected in an 1mp1nger placed between the two resin traps. The first
resin trap (front trap) contains approximately 1.6 g Tenax and the second
trap (back trap) contains approximately 1 g each of Tenax and petroleum-
based charcoal (SKC Lot 104 or equivalent), 3:1 by volume. A total of
six pairs of sorbent traps may be used to collect volatile POHCs from the
effluent gas stream.
1.1.4 An alternative set of conditions for sample collection has
been used. This method Involves collecting sample volume of 20 liters or
less at reduced flow rate. (Operation of the VOST under these conditions
has been referred to as SL0-V0ST.) This method has been used to collect
5 liters of sample (0.25 L/m1n for 20 rain) or 20 liters of sample
(0.5 L/m1n for 40 m1n) on each pair of sorbent cartridges. Smaller
sample volumes collected at lower flow rates should be considered when
the boiling points of the POHCs of Interest are below 35*C. A total of
six pairs of sorbent traps may be used to collect volatile POHCs from the
effluent gas stream.
0030 - 1
B-93
Revision 0
Date September 1986
-------
1.1.5 Analysis of the traps Is carried out by thermal desorptlon
purge-and-trap by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (see Method 5040).
The VOST Is designed to be operated at 1 L/m1n with traps being replaced
every 20 mln for a total sampling time of 2 hr. Traps may be analyzed
separately or combined onto one trap to improve detection limit.
However, additional flow rates and sampling times are acceptable. Recent
experience has shown that when less than maximum detection ability 1s
required, It 1s acceptable and probably preferable to operate the VOST at
0.5 L/m1n for a total of three 40-m1n periods. This preserves the 2-hr
sampling period, but reduces the number of cartridge changes 1n the field
as well as the number of analyses required.
1.2 ApplIcatlon
1.2.1 This method 1s applicable to the determination of volatile
POHCs 1n the stack gas effluent of hazardous waste Incinerators. This
method Is designed for use in calculating destruction and removal
efficiency (ORE) for the volatile POHCs and to enable a determination
that DRE values for removal of the volatile POHCs are equal to or greater
than 99.99X.
1.2.2 The sensitivity of this method 1s dependent upon the level of
Interferences In the sample and the presence of detectable levels of
volatile POHCs 1n blanks. The target detection Hm1t of this method 1s
0.1 ug/m3 (ng/L) of flue gas, to permit calculation of a ORE equal to or
greater than 99.99X for volatile POHCs which may be present 1n the waste
stream at 100 ppm. The upper end of the range of applicability of this
method Is limited by breakthrough of the volatile POHCs on the sorbent
traps used to collect the sample. Laboratory development data have
demonstrated a range of 0.1 to 100 ug/m3 (ng/L) for selected volatile
POHCs collected on a pair of sorbent traps using a total sample volume of
20 liters or less (see Paragraph 1.1.4).
1.2.3 This method is recommended for use only by experienced
sampling personnel and analytical chemists or under close supervision by
such qualified persons.
1.2.4 Interferences arise primarily from background contamination
of sorbent traps prior to or after use 1n sample collection. Many
potential Interferences can be due to exposure of the sorbent materials
to solvent vapors prior to assembly and exposure to significant
concentrations of volatile POHCs 1n the ambient air at hazardous waste
Incinerator sites.
1.2.5 To avoid or minimize the low-level contamination of train
components with volatile POHCs, care should be taken to avoid contact of
all Interior surface or train components with synthetic organic materials
(e.g., organic solvents, lubricating and sealing greases), and train
components should be carefully cleaned and conditioned according to the
procedures described 1n this protocol.
0030 - 2
B-94
Revision 0
Date September 1986
-------
2.0 APPARATUS
2.1 Volatile Organic Sampling Train: A schematic diagram of the
principal components of the VOST 1s shown 1n Figure 1 and a diagram of one
acceptable version of the VOST 1s shown 1n Figure 2. The VOST consists of a
glass-Hned probe followed by an Isolation valver a water-cooled glass
condenser, a sorbent cartridge containing Tenax (1.6 g), an empty 1mp1nger for
condensate removal, a second water-cooled glass condenser, a second sorbent
cartridge containing Tenax and petroleum-based charcoal (3:1 by volume;
approximately 1 g of each), a silica gel drying tube, a calibrated rotameter,
a sampling pump, and a dry gas meter. The gas pressure during sampling and
for leak-checking 1s monitored by pressure gauges which are 1n line and
downstream of the silica gel drying tube. The components of the sanpling
train are described below.
2.1.1 Probe: The probe should be made of stainless steel with a
boroslHcate or quartz glass liner. The temperature of the probe 1s to
be maintained above 130*C but low enough to ensure a resin temperature of
20*C. A water-cooled probe may be required at elevated stack
temperatures to protect the probe and meet the above requirements.
Isokinetic sample collection 1s not a requirement for the use of VOST
since the compounds of Interest are 1n the vapor phase at the point of
sample col lection,
2.1.2 Isolation valve: The Isolation valve should be a greaseless
stopcock with a glass bore and sliding Teflon plug with Teflon wipers
(Ace 8193 or equivalent).
2.1.3 Condensers: The condensers (Ace 5979-14 or equivalent)
should be of sufficient capacity to cool the gas stream to 20*C or less
prior to passage through the first sorbent cartridge. The top connection
of the condenser should be able to form a leak-free, vacuum-tight seal
without using sealing greases.
2.1.4 Sorbent cartrldges:
2.1.4.1 The sorbent cartridges used for the VOST may be used
1n either of two configurations: the 1ns1de-outs1de (I/O)
configuration In which the cartridge 1s held within an outer glass
tube and 1n a metal carrier, and the 1ns1de-1ns1de (I/I)
configuration 1n which only a single glass tube 1s used, with or
without a metal carrier. In either case, the sorbent packing will
be the same.
2.1.4.1.1 The first of a pair of sorbent cartridges shall
be packed with approximately 1.6 g Tenax GC resin and the
second cartridge of a pair shall be packed with Tenax GC and
petroleum-based charcoal (3:1 by volume; approximately 1 g of
each).
2.1.4.1.2 The second sorbent cartridge shall be packed so
that the sample gas stream passes through the Tenax layer first
and then through the charcoal layer.
0030 - 3
Revision 0
Date September 1986
B-95
-------
w
I
VO
On
o
o
CO
o
O TO
(u n>
r* <
ro -*•
(/)
CO o
CD 3
fa
Gltn Wool
Pirticulili
Filter
BMC
He«ted Probe
ft
STACK
(or lest System)
Empty SiliCM Gel
Implnger
Condensate
Trap
Impinger
Vacuum
Indicator
Ice water
Backup
Resin
Trap
Resin
Trap
Exhauit
Pump
Dry Gas
Met"
Rotameter
Figure 1. Schematic o» Volatile Organic Sampling Train (VOST).
-------
Teflon Plug Valve w/Socket Joint
Condensers
Tubing
Tenax Trap
Tenax/Charcoal
Trap
(mpinger
Silica Gel Holder
I
Vacuum Gaces
Flow Meter
Vacuum Pump
Submersible
Pump
Ice Water Bath
£7
Case
Figure 2. Volatile Organic Sampling Train (VOST).
0030 - 5
Revision 0
Date September 1986
B-97
-------
2.1,4,2 The sorbent cartridges shall be glass tubes with
approximate dimensions of 10 cm by 1.6 cm I.D. The two acceptable
designs (I/0t I/I) for the sorbent cartridge are described in
further detail below.
2.1.4.2.1 Inside/Inside sorbent cartridge: A diagram of
an I/I sorbent cartridge 1s shown in Figure 3. This cartridge
is a single glass tube (10 cm by 1.6 cm I.D.) which has the
ends reduced in size to accommodate a 1/4- or 3/8-1n, Swagelok
or Cajon gas fitting. The resin is held in place by glass wool
at each end of the resin layer. The amounts of each type of
sorbent material used in the I/I design are the same as for the
I/O design. Threaded end caps are placed on the sorbent
cartridge after packing with sorbent to protect the sorbent
from contamination during storage and transport.
2.1.4.2.2 Inside/Outside type sorbent cartridge: A
diagram of an I/O sorbent cartridge Is shown In Figure 4. In
this design the sorbent materials are held 1n the glass tube
with a fine mesh stainless steel screen and a C-cllp. The
glass tube is then placed within a larger diameter glass tube
and held 1n place using V1ton 0-rings. The purpose of the
outer glass tube is to protect the exterior of the resin-
containing tube from contamination. The two glass tubes are
held in a stainless steel cartridge holder, where the ends of
the glass tubes are held in place by Viton O-rings placed 1n
machine grooves in each metal end piece. The three cylindrical
rods are secured 1n one of the metal end pieces and fastened to
the other end piece using knurled nuts, thus sealing the glass
tubes Into the cartridge holder. The end pieces are fitted
with a threaded nut onto which a threaded end cap 1s fitted
with a ¥1ton G-r1ng seal, to protect the resin from
contamination during transport and storage.
2.1.5 Metering system: The metering system for VOST shall consist
of vacuum gauges, a leak-free pump (Thomas Model 107 or equivalent,
Thomas Industries, Sheboygan, Wisconsin), a calibrated rotameter {L1nde
Model 150, linde Division of Union Carbide, Keasbey, New Jersey) for
monitoring the gas flow rate, a dry gas meter with 2% accuracy at the
required sampling rate, and related valves and equipment. Provisions
should be made for monitoring the temperature of the sample gas stream
between the first condenser and first sorbent cartridge. This can be
done by placing a thermocouple on the exterior glass surface of the
outlet from the first condenser. The temperature at that point should be
less than 20#C. If 1t 1s not, an alternative condenser providing the
required cooling capacity must be used.
2.1.6 Sample transfer lines: All sample transfer lines to connect
the probe to the YOST shall be less than 5 ft In length, and shall be
heat-traced Teflon with connecting fittings which are capable of forming
leak-free, vacuum-tight connections without the use of sealing grease.
0030 - 6
B-98
Revision 0
Date September 1986
-------
oo dboooooc
>OCOOOOOOOl
oooooooooa
>0000000001
0000000000
~ 000c OOOO'
0000 0000a
)OOOCXOOOO«
0000^)0000
>OOOC^OOOO(
0000^)0000
> O O O CliJ 0 0 O O 1
OOOO u)00O O
>000 0 00001
0000000000
>0000000001
0000000000
>0000000004
pooooooooo./
&
*0
o
>
s
v»
c
J
c
ri
4>
3
o
0030 - 7
B-99
Revision 0
Date September 1986
-------
O TO
o* n
r+ <
A -*•
t/> O
l<5 3
(®t
Saction cut through qlaaa tub«a
(ihovlng acrecn. C-clip and O-rlnq In place)
LEGEND
A
Stainless Sievl Carrier
B
Glass Tube (9.84 L x 2 22 10)
C
Small Glass TuIm |10cm x 1.6cm ID)
o
D
Fine Mesh Stainless Steel Screen
o
u>
E
Stainless Steel C-Qip
to
o
F
0 Ring (Viton)
1
1
G
Nuts 0)
o
00
H
EocI Cap with Viton 0-fiing
O
1
Metal Bcxl with Threaded End (3)
J
Tenax/Charcoal Sorl*nt
K
• Cajon Fitting
BOTTOM
NOT TO SCAI.E
-I
—c
—I
Aaanbled Tup
NTS
Figure 4. Sorbent Trap Assembly (I/O)
Volatile Organic Sampling Train (VOST)
-------
All other sample transfer lines used with the VOST shall be Teflon with
connecting fittings that are capable of forming leak-free, vacuum-tight
connections without the use of sealing grease.
3.0 REAGENTS AND MATERIALS
3.1 2,6-Dlphenylene oxide polymer (Tenax, 35/60 mesh):
3.1.1 The new Tenax Is Soxhlet extracted for 24 hr with methanol
(Burdlck & Jackson, pesticide grade or equivalent). The Tenax 1s dried
for 6 hr In a vacuum oven at 50*C before use. Users of I/O and I/I
sorbent cartridges have used slightly different thermal conditioning
procedures. I/O sorbent cartridges packed with Tenax are thermally
conditioned by flowing organic-free nitrogen (30 mL/m1n) through the
resin while heating to 190*C. Some users have extracted new Tenax and
charcoal with pentane to remove nonpolar Impurities. However, these
users.have experienced problems with residual pentane 1n the sorbents
during analysis.
3.1.2 If very high concentrations of volatile POHCs have been
collected on the resin (e.g., micrograms of analytes), the sorbent may
require Soxhlet extraction as described above. Previously used Tenax
cartridges are thermally reconditioned by the method described above.
3.2 Charcoal (SKC petroleum-base or equivalent): New charcoal 1s
prepared and charcoal 1s reconditioned as described 1n Paragraph 4.4. New
charcoal does not require treatment prior to assembly Into sorbent cartridges.
Users of VOST have restricted the types of charcoal used In sorbent cartridges
to only petroleum-based types. Criteria for other types of charcoal are
acceptable 1f recovery of POHC 1n laboratory evaluations meet the criteria of
50 to 150X.
3.3 V1ton-Q-R1nq: All 0-r1ngs used 1n VOST shall be Vlton. Prior to
use, these 0-rings should be thermally conditioned at 200*C for 48 hr.
0-rings should be stored in clean, screw-capped glass containers prior to use,
3.4 Glass tubes/Condensers; The glass resin tubes and condensers should
be cleaned with a nonlonic detergent In an ultrasonic bath, rinsed well with
organic-free water, and dried at 110*C. Resin tubes of the I/O design should
be assembled prior to storage as described in Paragraph 4.1. Resin tubes of
the I/I design can be stored In glass culture tube containers with cotton
cushioning and Teflon-lined screw caps. Condensers can be capped with
appropriate end caps prior to use.
3.5 Metal parts: The stainless steel carriers, C-cl1ps, end plugs, and
screens used 1n the I/O VOST design are cleaned by ultrasonlcatlon in a warm
nonlonic detergent solution, rinsed with distilled water, a1r-dr1ed, and
heated in a muffle furnace for 2 hr at 400*C. Resin tubes of the I/I design
require Swagelok or equivalent end caps with Supelco M-l ferrules. These
should be heated at 190*C along with the assembled cartridges.
0030 - 9
B-101
Revision 0
Date September 1986
-------
3.6 Silica qel (Indicating type, 6-16 mesh): New silica gel may be used
as r$ceivecT Si 1 lea gel which has been previously used should be dried for 2
hr at 175*C (35(TF).
3.7 Cold packs: Any commercially available reusable liquids or gels
that can be repeatedly frozen are acceptable. They are typically sold 1n
plastic containers as "Blue Ice" or "Ice-Packs." Enough should be used to
keep cartridges at or near 4'C.
3.8 Water: Water used for cooling train components 1n the field may be
tap water; and water used for rinsing glassware should be organic-free.
3.9 Glass wool: Glass wool should be Soxhlet extracted for 8 to 16 hrf
using methanolr and oven dried at 110*C before use.
4.0 SAMPLE HANDLING AND PROCEDURE
4.1 Assembly:
4.1.1 The assembly and packing of the sorbent cartridges should be
carried out 1n an area free of volatile organic material, preferably a
laboratory 1n which no organic solvents are handled or stored and 1n
which the laboratory air 1s charcoal filtered. Alternatively, the
assembly procedures can be conducted 1n a glove box which can be purged
with organic-free nitrogen.
4.2 Tenax cartridges:
4.2.1 The Tenax, glass tubes, and metal cartridge parts are cleaned
and stored (see Section 3.0). Approximately 1.6 g of Tenax 1s weighed
and packed Into the sorbent tube which has a stainless steel screen and
C-cl1p (I/O design) or glass wool (I/I design) In the downstream end.
The Tenax Is held 1n place by Inserting a stainless steel screen and
C-cl1ps 1n the upstream end (I/O design) or glass wool (I/I design).
Each cartridge should be marked, using an engraving tool, with an arrow
to indicate the direction of sample flow, and a serial number.
4.2.2 Conditioned resin tubes of the I/O design are then assembled
Into the metal carriers according to the previously described
1ns1de/1ns1de or 1ns1de/outs1de procedures (with end caps) and are placed
on cold packs for storage and transport. Conditioned resin tubes of the
I/I design are capped and placed on cold packs for storage and transport.
4.3 Tenax/Charcoal tubes
4.3.1 The Tenax, charcoal, and metal cartridge parts are cleaned
and stored as previously described (see Section 3.0). The tubes are
packed with approximately a 3:1 volume ratio of Tenax and charcoal
(approximately 1 g each). The Tenax and charcoal are held 1n place by
the stainless steel screens and C-cl1ps (I/O design) or by glass wool
(I/I design). The glass tubes containing the Tenax and charcoal are then
0030 - 10
B-102
Revision 0
Date September 1986
-------
conditioned as described below (see Paragraph 4,4). Place the I/O glass
tubes 1n the metal carriers (see Paragraph 2.1.4.2.2), put end caps on
the assembled cartridges, mark direction of sample flow and serial
number, and place the assembled cartridges on cold packs for storage and
transport.
4.3.2 Glass tubes of the I/I design are conditioned, and stored 1n
the same manner as the I/O tubes.
4.4 Trap Conditioning - QC
4.4.1 Following assembly and leak-checking, the traps are connected
1n reverse direction to sampling to a source of organic-free nitrogen,
and nitrogen Is passed through each trap at a flow rate of 40 mL/mln,
while the traps are heated to 190*C for 12-28 hr. The actual
conditioning period may be determined based on adequacy of the resulting
blank checks.
4.4.2 The following procedure Is used to blank check each set of
sampling cartridges prior to sampling to ensure cleanliness. The
procedure provides sem1-quant1tat1ve data for organic compounds with
boiling points below 110#C on Tenax and Tenax/Charcoal cartridges. It 1s
not intended as a substitute for Method 5040.
4.4.2.1 The procedure 1s based on thermal desorptlon of each
set of two cartridges, cryofocuslng with liquid nitrogen onto a trap
packed with glass beads, followed by thermal desorptlon from the
trap and analysis by GC/FID.
4.4.2.2 The detection limit is based on the analysis of Tenax
cartridges spiked with benzene and toluene and 1s around 2 ng for
each compound.
4.4.2.3 The results of analyzing spiked cartridges on a dally
basis should not vary by more than 20 percent. If the results are
outside this range, the analytical system must be evaluated for the
probable cause and a second spiked cartridge analyzed.
4.4.2.4 The GC operating conditions are as follows:
GC Operating Conditions
Column: Packed column 6 ft x 1/8" stainless steel 1.0 percent
SP-1000 on Carbopack 8 60/80, or equivalent.
Temperature program: 50*C for 5 min, 20*C/m1n Increase to
190#C, hold 13 m1n.
Injector: 200*C.
Detector: F.I.D. 250*C.
Carrier Gas: Helium at 25 ml/m1n.
Sample valve: Valco 6-port with 40* x 1/16" stainless steel
trap packed with 60/80 mesh glass beads.
Cryogen: Liquid nitrogen.
Trap heater: Boiling water, hot oil, or electrically heated.
0030 - 11
Revision 0
Date September 1986
B-103
-------
Desorptlon heater: Supelco Mclam shell" (high capacity carrier
gas purifier) heater and Varlac, adjusted to 180*C to
200*C.
4.4.2.5 Calibration is accomplished by preparing a spiked
Tenax cartridge with benzene and toluene and analyzing according to
the standard operating procedure. A standard of benzene, toluene
and bromofluorobenzene (BFB) 1s prepared by Injecting 2.0 uL of
benzene and toluene and 1.0 uL of BFB Into 10 mL of methanol. The
concentration of this stock 1s 175 ng/uL of benzene and toluene, and
150 ng/uL BFB. One microliter of the stock standard 1s Injected
onto a Tenax cartridge through a heated Injection port set at 150*0.
A GC oven can be used for this with the oven at room temperature.
Helium carrier gas is set at 50 ml/m1n. The solvent flush technique
should be used. After two m1n, remove the Tenax cartridge and place
1n the desorptlon heater for analysis. BFB 1s also used as an
Internal standard spike for GC/MS analysis which provides a good
comparison between GC/FID and GC/MS. The results of this spike
analysis should not vary more than 20 percent day to day. Initially
and then periodically this spiked Tenax should be reanalyzed a
second time to verify that the 10 m1n desorptlon time and 180-200*C
temperature are adequate to remove all of the spiked components. It
should be noted that only one spiked Tenax cartridge need be
prepared and analyzed dally unless otherwise needed to ensure proper
Instrument operation.
An acceptable blank level 1s left to the discretion of the
method analyst. An acceptable level is one that allows adequate
determination of expected components emitted from the waste being
burned.
4.4.3 After conditioning, traps are sealed and placed on cold packs
until sampling is accomplished. Conditioned traps should be held for a
minimum amount of time to prevent the possibility of contamination.
4.4.4 It may be useful to spike the Tenax and Tenax/charcoal traps
with the compounds of Interest to ensure that they can be thermally
desorbed under laboratory conditions. After spiked traps are analyzed
they may be reconditioned and packed for sampling.
4.5 Pretest preparation:
4.5.1 All train components shall be cleaned and assembled as
previously described. A dry gas meter shall have been calibrated within
30 days prior to use, using an EPA-supplied standard orifice.
4.5.2 The VOST is assembled according to the schematic diagram in
Figure 1. The cartridges should be positioned so that sample flow 1s
0030 - 12
B-104
Revision 0
Date September 1986
-------
through the Tenax first and then the Tenax/charcoal. Cooling water
should be circulated to the condensers and the temperature of the cooling
water should be maintained near O'C. The end caps of the sorbent
cartridges should be placed 1n a clean screw-capped glass container
during sample collection.
4.6 Leak-checking:
4.6.1 The train 1s leak-checked by closing the yalve at the inlet
to the first condenser and pulling a vacuum of 250 mm (10 1n. Hg) above
the normal operating pressure. The traps and condensers are Isolated
from the pump and the leak rate noted. The leak rate should be less than
2.5 mm Hg after 1 m1n. The train 1s then returned to atmospheric
pressure by attaching a charcoal-filled tube to the train Inlet and
admitting ambient air filtered through the charcoal. This procedure will
minimize contamination of the VOST components by excessive exposure to
the fugitive emissions at hazardous waste Incinerator sites.
4.7 Sample Collection
4.7.1 After leak-checking, sample collection 1s accomplished by
opening the valve at the Inlet to the first condenser, turning on the
pump, and sampling at a rate of 1 I1ter/m1n for 20 m1n. The volume of
sample for any pair of traps should not exceed 20 liters.
4.7.2 Following collection of 20 liters of sample, the train 1s
leak-checked a second time at the highest pressure drop encountered
during the run to minimize the chance of vacuum desorptlon of organlcs
from the Tenax. The train 1s returned to atmospheric pressure, using the
method discussed 1n Paragraph 4.1 and the two sorbent cartridges are
removed. The end caps are replaced and the cartridges shall be placed 1n
a suitable environment for storage and transport until analysis. The
sample 1s considered invalid 1f the leak test does not meet
specification.
4.7.3 A new pair of cartridges is placed 1n the VOST, the VOST
leak-checked, and the sample collection process repeated as described
above. Sample collection continues until six pairs of traps have been
used.
4.7.4 All sample cartridges should be kept on cold packs until they
are ready for analysis.
4.8 Blanks
4.8.1 Field blanks/trip blanks: Blank Tenax and Tenax/charcoal
cartridges are taken to the sampling site and the end caps removed for
the period of time required to exchange two pairs of traps on VOST.
After the two VOST traps have been exchanged, the end caps are replaced
on the blank Tenax and Tenax/charcoal tubes and these are returned to the
cold packs and analyzed with the sample traps. At least one pair of
field blanks (one Tenax, one Tenax/charcoal) shall be included with each
0030 - 13
B-105
Revision 0
Date September 1986
-------
six pairs of sample cartridges collected (or for each field trial using
VOST to collect volatile POHCs).
4.8.2 Trip blanks: At least one pair of blank cartridges (one
Tenax, one Tenax/charcoal) shall be Included with shipment of cartridges
to a hazardous waste incinerator site. These "field blanks" will be
treated like any other cartridges except that the end caps will not be
removed during storage at the site. This pair of traps will be analyzed
to monitor potential contamination which may occur during storage and
shipment.
4.8.3 Laboratory blanks: One pair of blank cartridges (one Tenax,
one Tenax/charcoal) will remain 1n the laboratory using the method of
storage which 1s used for field samples. If the field and trip blanks
contain high concentrations of contaminants (e.g., greater than 2 ng of a
particular P0HC)r the laboratory blank shall be analyzed In order to
identify the source of contamination,
5.0 CALCULATIONS (for sample volume)
5.1 The following nomenclature are used in the calculation of sample
volume:
Pbar = Barometric pressure at the exit orifice of the dry gas meter, mm
(1n.) Hg.
pstd = Standard absolute pressure, 760 mm (29.92 1n.) Hg.
I'm = Dr*y 9as meter average absolute temperature, K (*R).
Tstd 3 Standard absolute temperature, 293K (528*R).
Vm = Dry gas volume measured by dry gas meter, dcm (dcf).
vm(std) = Dry gas volume measured by dry gas meter, corrected to standard
conditions, dscm (dscf).
7 = Dry gas meter calibration factor.
5.2 The volume of gas sampled 1s calculated as follows:
TP VP
,, std bar m bar
".(su) " V r. fjtd M t.
where:
Kj - 0.3858 K/mni Hg for metric units, or
Kj = 17.64 *R/1n. Hg for English units.
0030 - 14
B-106
Revision 0
Date September 1986
-------
6.0 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE
See Method 5040.
7.0 PRECISION AND ACCURACY REQUIREMENTS
7.1 Method Performance Check
Prior to field operation of the VOST at a hazardous waste Incine-
rator, a method performance check should be conducted using either
selected volatile POHCs of interest or two or more of the volatile POHCs
for which data are available. This check may be conducted on the entire
system (VOST/GC/MS) by analysis of a gas cylinder containing POHCs of
interest or on only the analytical system by spiking of the POHCs onto
the traps. The results of this check for replicate pairs of traps should
demonstrate that recovery of the analytes fall within 50X to 150X of the
expected values.
7.2 Performance Audit
During a trial burn a performance audit must be completed. The
audit results should agree within 50% to 150X of the expected value for
each specific target compound. This audit consists of collecting a gas
sample containing one or more POHCs 1n the VOST from an EPA ppb gas
cylinder. Collection of the audit sample 1n the VOST may be conducted
either in the laboratory or at the trial burn site. Anaysls of the VOST
audit sample must be by the same person, at the same t1mer and with the
same analytical procedure as used for the regular VOST trail burn
samples. EPA ppb gas cylinders currently available for VOST Audit are
shown 1n Table 1 below.
The audit procedure, audit equipment and audit cylinder may be
obtained by writing:
Audit Cylinder Gas Coordinator (MD-77B)
Quality Assurance Division
Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
or by calling the Audit Cylinder Gas Coordinator at (919) 541-4531.
The request for the audit must be made at least 30 days prior to the
scheduled trial burn. If a P0HC 1s selected for which EPA does not have
an audit cylinder, this audit 1s not required.
0030 - 15
l^B-107
Revision 0
Date September 1986
-------
8.0 REFERENCES
1. Protocol for the Collection and Analysis of Volatile POHCs Using VOST.
EPA/600/8-84/007, March 1984.
2. Sykes, A.L., Standard Operating Procedure for Blanking Tenax and
Tenax/Charcoal Sampling Cartridges for Volatile Organic Sampling Train (VOST),
Radion Corporation, P.O. Box 13000, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
3. Validation of the Volatile Organic Sampling Train (VOST) Protocol, Vols. I
and II, EPA/600/4-86/014a, January 1986.
0030 - 16
B-108
Revision 0
Date September 1986
-------
TABLE 1: Organic Gases 1n the ppb Audit Repository
Group I
5 Organlcs 1n N2:
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Perchloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
Benzene
Ranges of cylinders
currently available:
7-90 ppb
90 - 430 ppb
430 - 10,000 ppb
Group II
9 Organlcs In N2
Trlchloroethylene
lf2-01chloroethane
1,2-Dlbromoethane
F-12
f-ii
Bromomethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
1,1,1-Tr1chloroethane
Acetronltrlle
Ranges of cylinders
currently available:
7-90 ppb
90 - 430 ppb
0030 - 17
Revision 0
Date September 1986
B-109
-------
TABLE 1: Organic Gases In the ppb Audit Repository (Continued)
Group III
7 Organlcs 1n N2:
VinylIdene chloride
F-113
F-114
Acetone
1,4-Dloxane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ranges of cylinders
currently available:
7-90 ppb
90 - 430 ppb
Group IV
6 Organlcs 1n N2:
Acrylonltrlle
1,3-Butadlene
Ethylene oxide
Methylene chloride
Propylene oxide
Ortho-xylene
Ranges of cylinders
currently available:
7-90 ppb
430 - 10,000
0030 - 18
B-110
Revision 0
Date September 1986
-------
CHEMICAL SPECIATION OF NICKEL PHASES IN INDUSTRIAL DUSTS
Vladimir J. Zatka
INCO LIMITED, J.Roy Gordon Research Laboratory, Sheridan Park,
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5K 1Z9
JRGRL, May 3, 1990
Updated, September 5, 1990
(Supersedes the draft of January 13, 1989)
INCO LIMITED, Its subsidiaries and employees, assume no responsibility
for the Information contained herein and make no express or implied
warranty relating to this Information, and any use of such Information is
at the user's sole risk and responsibility.
B-lll
-------
SPECIATION OF NICKEL PHASES IN INDUSTRIAL DUSTS
1990-09-05 JRGRL, V.J. Zatka
OUTLINE
Individual nickel phases are extracted from the dust sample (-400
mesh, <0.037 mm) by sequential selective leaching. Four phase categories
can be determined;
1) soluble nickel - water soluble normal nickel salts;
2) sulfidic nickel - besides Ni^S^ and NiS also dissolved are
arsenides NiAs and Ni^ASg, and selenide
NiSe; phases, such as NijASj and NiTe,
yield more slowly and, as the rate is
particle size dependent, may require
longer leaching time than specified in
this procedure;
3) metallic nickel - free or alloyed with iron (ferronickel);
4) oxidic nickel - refractory nickel oxide.
The sequential Teachings are carried out 1n an all-Teflon filter
holder fitted with a regenerated cellulose membrane filter. The test
sample, a portion of bulk dust or a dust-loaded 37 mm membrane or an
areal portion of a loaded high-volume fiber filter, is transferred onto
the cellulose filter and the individual nickel phases are selectively
leached. The 37 mm membrane can be held in place by a glass tripod, and
so prevented from floating. Each leach solution is evaporated to dryness
and the residues are wet-ashed with nitric and perchloric acids. The
leached sample residue and filter(s) are also dissolved in nitric and
perchloric acids. Each leach solution is analyzed for nickel by
conventional atomic absorption (or plasma emission, if available).
To simplify the final wet-ashing, it is recommended to have the
airborne dusts collected on PVC acrylic copolymer filters, such as the
Gelman DM Metrlcel membranes, rather than on plain PVC. For hi-vol
sampling, quartz fiber filters, which have a very small surface
alkalinity, are preferred to glass fiber filters. High alkalinity of
glass fibers has been linked to secondary chemical changes in sampled
dusts and to possible formation of basic nickel salts.
B-112
-------
3
Soluble nickel phases, mostly in the form of normal nickel sulfate,
are generally leached at pH 4. However, leaching of basic nickel salts
at this pH is very slow and, without being completed, may still continue
in the next sulfidic group causing false nickel finds. If the sample to
be analyzed is known to contain basic nickel salts, leaching of the
soluble nickel phases should be done at lower pH of 2.1 (0.1M citric acid
solution). This approach ensures dissolution of all nickel salts
including the basic salt component, and sulfidic nickel artefacts are so
avoided. Surface Ni(III) from black nickel oxide, and nickel hydroxide,
if present in the sample, may be leached to a various extent.
Test samples suspected of containing organic matter, such as
uncombusted tarry material from incinerator operations, must be leached
with methanol before speciatlon leaching. The organics are so dissolved
and removed, and the dust particulates are made readily wettable by the
aqueous ammonium citrate solution.
REAGENTS
AMMONIUM CITRATE. 0.1M SOLUTION (pH 4.4)
Dissolve 8.5 g of diammoniura citrate, (NH^HCit, and 2.6 g of
citric acid monohydrate, H^CIt.H^O, 1n distilled water and dilute to 500
mL. Check pH with a meter and adjust, if necessary, to 4,4 with ammonia
or citric acid.
CITRATE WASH SOLUTION
Dilute 100 mL of the 0.1M ammonium citrate solution to 500 mL and
mix.
PEROXIDE-CITRATE LEACH SOLUTION
Mix two volumes of 0.1M ammonium citrate solution (pH 4.4) and one
volume of 30% hydrogen peroxide. The mixed solution should have pH 4.0-
4.2. Adjust, 1f necessary, with ammonia or citric acid. Prepare fresh
before use.
STANDARD NICKEL STOCK SOLUTION (1 g N1/L)
Dissolve 1.00 gram of nickel metal in a minimum of 8M nitric acid.
Add 15 mL of sulfuric add (1+1) and evaporate to dryness. Cool and
dissolve the salts in 100 mL of 6M hydrochloric acid. Transfer to a one
litre volumetric flask, dilute to volume with water and mix.
B-113
-------
<1
DILUTE STANDARD NICKEL SOLUTION (100 ng Ni/mL)
Pipet 50 mL of the 1 g/L standard nickel solution into a 500 mL
volumetric flask. Add 25 mL of concentrated hydrochloric acid, dilute to
volume with water and mix:
NICKEL WORKING STANDARDS
Prepare 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 pg N1/mL standards by
pipetting 1.0-, 2.0-, 5.0-, 10.0-, and 20.0~mL aliquots of the 100 ug/mL
dilute standard nickel solution into 200 mL volumetric flasks. Add 8 mL
of concentrated hydrochloric acid to each, dilute to volume with water,
and mix.
A separate set of working standards with a sodium and calcium
matrix is required for the measurement of oxidic nickel in hi-vol dust
samples collected on glass fiber filters. The matrix must match the
sodium and calcium contribution from the areal portion of the filter
used. No matching matrix 1s required in the analysis of quartz fiber
filters.
APPARATUS
TEFLON (PFA) FILTER HOLDER. 47 mm (Savillex No. 4750-47-6) with a rubber
stopper and a 500 mL suction flask (Fig. 1). The top funnel of the
filter holder should be cut to a height of 30 mm.
SUPPORTING REGENERATED CELLULOSE MEMBRANE. 47 mm, such as the Sartorlus
SM116-07, 0.2 \m pore size. This type of filter material is required as
1t is alcohol and bromine resistant. Cellulose ester filters are not
suitable.
GLASS TRIPOD, about 34 mm wide, round or triangular, made of a glass rod,
about 3 mm 1n d1a.; leg height 7-10 mm.
FLARED GLASS ROD ("Wlllstfitter needle"), 3 mm max. In d1a. (Fig. 1),
slightly longer than the Teflon outlet tube of the filter holder. The
flared top of the rod rests on top of the outlet tube.
DETERMINATION OF NICKEL BY ATOMIC ABSORPTION
Measure the absorbance of each leach solution (Note) and of the
working standards at wavelength 232.0 nm using conventional flame atomic
absorption spectrometer. Make sure that all solutions are 5% v/v in
hydrochloric acid.
B-114
-------
5
Construct a calibration graph of absorbance versus concentration.
From the graph obtain the nickel concentration found in each leach
solution, correct it for the reagent blank, and calculate the nickel
content in the used dust portion or the dust load on the filter.
NOTE - The procedure calls for final volumes of 10 mL each. To measure
the very small nickel levels usually found in environmental
samples, the AA spectrometer, set in the ug/mL concentration mode,
must t?e calibrated to read to two decimal places. For a
satisfactory readout stability of ±0.01 ug/mL, the hollow cathode
lamp and the burner assembly have to be at thermal equilibrium.
Integration time of 3 sec is recommended. Under these conditions,
a limit of determination of 0.02 ug N1/mL (0.2 ug N1 abs.) can
readily be achieved. Only the first two of the working standard
solution set may then be needed.
REAGENT BLANK
Carry a blank cellulose filter membrane and a sampling filter
blank, if necessary, through the. procedure using all scheduled leaching
steps. Use the prescribed volumes of all leach solutions and acids. Wet-
ash the leached filters. Analyze each final solution for nickel.
Special attention should be paid to blanks of fiber filter portions used.
PROCEDURE
Set up the filtering system so that mild suction can be turned on
and off at short intervals as necessary. To collect the filtrates, place
a test tube 20x150 mm into the suction flask. It is advisable to make a
small spout in the test tube rim. Adjust the length of the Teflon holder
outlet tube so that it would reach into the test tube. Place the flared
glass rod into the tube as shown 1n F1g. 1 to prevent the outlet tube to
stay filled with aqueous filtrates. Fit the Teflon holder with the
regenerated cellulose membrane. The filtering system 1s now ready for
use.
To analyze h1-vol samples, only an areal portion, such as a 2x8in.
strip, of the 8x10in. fiber filter sheet should be used. Fold the strip
onto the supporting cellulose membrane, cover it with the leach solution
and, using a glass rod, squeeze out all air bubbles.
Washing and complete removal of the dissolved nickel at each
leaching stage is of utmost importance to avoid nickel carryovers between
the phase categories, most significantly between the "soluble" and the
"sulfldic" groups. Filtrate which tends to accumulate under the filter-
supporting disc must always be removed before a new portion of the wash
solution is added. With the suction on, use rocking and tapping of the
tilted flask to drain all filtrate into the test tube. Special attention
has to be paid to washing of folded fiber filters. The technique which
B-115
-------
6
appears to serve best involves squeezing the folded filter with a glass
rod and holding for a couple of seconds while the suction is on.
Solution squeezed out is then rapidly drawn through the filter. First,
the whole surface area of the folded filter has to be treated in this
manner. Later, when most of the filter fibers are broken, the original
stiffness disappears and the fiber material begins to spread over the
supporting membrane filter. Complete removal of the solution by suction
then becomes easier. Turn the suction off between the washes, cover the
fiber layer?with 5 mL of wash solution, and work the layer carefully with
the glass rod to get all fibers well soaked. Turn suction on and drain
all solution, including that from underneath the support disc, to the
test tube. Repeat the wash three times.
WARNING, The procedure involves wet-ashing of organic matter by
perchloric acid. The fuming acid is a powerful oxidant and has to
be handled with great caution. Organic matter must first be
decomposed by conc. nitric acid before it is fumed with perchloric
add. If the hot perchloric acid solution turns dark, add a drop
of nitric acid to fully oxidize the carbonaceous material. The
evaporations must be carried out in fumehoods specially designed
for the use of perchloric acid.
DETERMINATION OF SOLUBLE NICKEL
Weigh differentially approx. 10 mg of the sample dust (-400 mesh,
<0.037 mm) and transfer 1t onto a moistened supporting cellulose membrane
in the filter holder (Note). Alternately, use filter, or a part of 1t,
loaded either in a personal filter pump cassette or in a hi-vol sampler.
A glass tripod can be used to hold the 37 mm membrane filter in place.
Moisten the sample with a few drops of methanol and add 15 mL of 0.1M
ammonium citrate solution (Note). Cover the filter funnel and allow the
sample to leach for 90 m1n (Note). Swirl the solution at times or
squeeze the filter folds under the leach solution. Apply gentle suction
and pass all solution through the filter. Wash the filter thoroughly
with the citrate wash solution making sure that all filtrate is fully
drained from the bottom of the filter holder before the next wash portion
1s added. Follow the procedure of washing the folded fiber filter as
described earlier. Transfer all filtrates to a 100 mL beaker and
evaporate to dryness. Moisten the residue with 1 mL each of conc. HNOj
and conc, HClOi, and wet-ash by digesting in the covered beaker. If a
dark spot developed, add one drop of conc. HN03. When contents of the
beaker become colorless, evaporate to dryness. Dissolve the warm residue
with 1 mL of HC1 (1+1) and transfer the solution to a 10 mL volumetric
flask. Dilute to volume with water and mix. Reserve the solution for
analysis. Return the rinsed empty test tube to the suction flask.
B-116
-------
7
NOTES - Before transferring the bulk sample portion, the cellulose
membrane should be moistened with the leach solution to
minimize static effects.
- Samples suspected of contamination with hydrophobic organic
matter (e.g. from incinerator operations) must first be
leached with 15 mL of methanol before adding the ammonium
citrate solution. The methanolic and the citrate filtrates
are then combined for joint processing.
- During the 90-min period, a portion of the leach solution may
pass through the supporting filter membrane. Since the
sample must remain covered with the leach solution throughout
the operation, return accumulated filtrate onto the filter as
necessary.
DETERMINATION OF SULFIDIC NICKEL
To the moist sample from which soluble nickel phases have been
leached add 15 mL of the peroxide-citrate leach solution. Cover the
filter holder with a watch glass, and allow the dust sample to react for
60 minutes. Keep the sample covered with solution by recycling the
filtrate if some has passed through the filter. When finished, apply
mild suction and draw all leach solution through the filter. Wash the
filters with the citrate wash solution. Remove water from the washed
filters by rinsing them twice with methanol (Note). Apply suction and
draw all liquid Into the test tube. Transfer the filtrates to a 100 mL
beaker and evaporate to dryness. Moisten the dry residue with 1 mL each
of conc. HNOj and conc. HCIO^, and wet-ash by digesting 1n the covered
beaker. When contents have turned colorless, evaporate to dryness.
Dissolve the warm residue with 1 mL of HC1 (1+1) and transfer the
solution to a 10 mL volumetric flask. Dilute to volume with water, mix,
and reserve the solution for analysis. Return the rinsed empty test tube
to the suction flask.
NOTE - Turbidity may occasionally develop 1n the filtrate after the
methanol wash. Produced by leached, water-insoluble organic
matter, the turbidity 1s no cause for concern.
DETERMINATION OF METALLIC NICKEL
To the methanol-washed sample filter(s) from which sulfldlc nickel
has been leached add 10 mL of anhydrous methanol containing 0.2 mL of
bromine (Note). Cover the filter holder and let stand for 5 sec (Note).
Apply suction to have the solution slowly pass through the filter. Wash
the filter with methanol until bromine-free. Transfer the filtrates to a
100 mL beaker and evaporate to dryness. Moisten the residue with 1 mL
B-117
-------
8
each of conc. HNO* and conc. HC104, wet-ash, and slowly evaporate to
dryness. Dissolve the warm residue with 1 ml of HC1 (1+1) and transfer
the solution to a 10 mL volumetric flask. Dilute to volume with water
and mix. Reserve the solution for analysis.
NOTES - The bromine solution must be prepared shortly before use to
prevent formation of hydrobromic acid and avoid premature
-j dissolution of some nickel oxides. For the same reason,
moisture must be excluded from the bromine-methanol system by
using anhydrous alcohol and by avoiding unnecessary contact
with moist atmospheric air,
- The leach duration should be kept to the minimum especially in
samples suspected of the presence of basic nickel salts. The
short reaction time does not inhibit complete dissolution of
the metallic phase.
DETERMINATION OF OXIDIC (REFRACTORY) NICKEL
Transfer the leached sample residue and filter(s) to a 150-200 mL
tall beaker. Wipe the bottom and inner walls of the Teflon funnel with
moist filter paper (Whatman #41) and add it to t,he beaker. Add 5 mL of
conc. HNOj, cover the beaker and digest on a hot plate until the filters
disintegrate. Add 4 mL of conc. HC104 and continue the digestion to wet-
ash the organic matter.
When analyzing a glass or quartz fiber filter strip (hi-vol
sample), transfer all filters to a 400 mL heatable Teflon beaker with a
graphite base (Nalge P/N 1550). Wipe the bottom and Inner walls of the
Teflon funnel with moist filter paper (Whatman #41) and add 1t to the
beaker. Add a mixture of 5 mL each of conc. HF and conc, HNOj. Heat to
dissolve the siliceous fibers and the cellulose membrane. Add 5 mL of
conc. HCIOj and evaporate to heavy perchloric acid fumes (max.
permissible hotplate temperature 280 "C), cool, rinse the beaker walls
and the cover with water, and evaporate to heavy fumes again. Repeat the
rinse and evaporation to allow for full elimination of the hydrofluoric
acid before the perchloric acid 1s volatilized (Note).
Continue digesting the perchloric acid solution 1n the covered
beaker until all sample particles are dissolved (Note). If the solution
darkens, add a few drops of conc. nitric acid to oxidize the residual
organic matter. Volatilize the perchloric add completely and dissolve
the warm residue 1n 1 mL of HC1 (1+1). Transfer the solution to a 10 mL
volumetric flask, dilute to volume with water and mix (Note). Analyze
the solution for nickel using appropriate working standard solutions.
B-118
-------
9
NOTES - An excess of free perchloric acid is required to effect complete
volatilization of hydrofluoric acid. More perchloric, acid
may be added if it happened to evaporate prematurely.
- To dissolve completely, refractory nickel oxide requires fuming
with conc. perchloric acid. Hotplate temperatures of less
than 210-240 'C will result in low nickel recoveries. It is
recommended to check the hot solution for undissolved sample
particles before the perchloric acid is finally volatilized.
" Addition of 1-2 drops of HF may assist the dissolution of
residues high in silica.
- In the analysis of hi-vol samples, a complete removal of
hydrofluoric acid will produce a clear final solution in the
volumetric flask.
B-119
-------
Figure 1
ALL TEFLON 47mm FILTER HOLDER FOR FILTERING FLASKS
n
n
n
n
Excess Material
Cut Off
37mm
Sampling
Filter
Support -
Membrane
Flared -3mm
Glass Rod
Rubber
Stopper
500ml Filtering
Flask
Mounting Tube
SAVILLEX CORPORATION,
5325 Highiray 101,
Uinnetonka, MN 55343, teL(6l2)934-4050
Part #4750-47-6
B-120
-------
Appendix C
Sample Calculations
C-l
-------
PISLD DATA AND K8SULT8
1ABULA7IC*
PLANT:
831
SAMPLING LOCAXICWJ Site 9
OUT-KM5-7A
MZD-MM5-7A
OUT-MM5-7C
KID-MK5-7C
Test Date
6/04/90
6/04/90
6/04/90
6/04/90
Bun Start Tin
Run Finish Tlse
1715
191S
1718
1918
630
1015
817
1017
Bet Traversing Point*
8
24
21
24
Theta
Vet Jtua TIM, Minutes
120.00
120.00
100.00
120.00
Dia
Boizle DlaaetAT/ Inches
0.242
0.245
0.243
0.245
Cp
Pitot Tub* Coefficient
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.84
Y
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
0.9960
1.0240
0.9960
1.0240
Pbar
Barooetric Pressure/ Inehet Hg
29.1
29.2
29.8
29.6
Delta-fl
I Avg. pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches 320
2.496
1.412
1.43
1.323
Va
VoXuae Of Metered Gas S&aple, Dry ACF
109.922
74.476
71.940
71.261
ta
Dry Gas Meter Te^>«rature, Degraee F
98
98
89
89
Vfcstd
Voluae Of Metered Gas Saaple, Dry SCT*
102.136
70.649
68.850
69.630
vie
Total Liquid Collected In
Tapingera 6 silica Gel, grass
81.5
72.0
63.4
91.0
VW«td
Voluae of Water Vapor/ SCF*
3.836
3.389
2.984
4.283
\S20
Moisture Content/ Percent by Voluae
3.6
4.6
4.2
5.8
Mid
Dry Mole Fraction
0.964
0.954
0.958
0.942
%C02
Carbon Dioxide, Percent By volune, Dry
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
%02
Cteygect, Percent By Voluae, Dry
14.0
14.0
14.0
14.0
%CO*H2
CO ~ M2, Peroent By voluae. Dry
81.0
81.0
81.0
81.0
Md
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/lb-Mole, Dry
29.36
29.36
29.36
29.36
Ms
Gae Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Hole/ Vet
28.95
28.84
28.88
28.70
Pg
Flue Cas Static Pressure/ Inchee H20
-0.25
-30.00
-0.38
-30.00
Ps
Absolute Flue Gas Pressure/ Inches Hg
29.28
26.99
29.77
27.39
ts
Flue Gaa Taaperature, Degrees F
142
90
136
89
Delta-
p Average Velocity Bead, Inchee B20
0. 800
0.360
0.450
0.337
VS
Flue Gas Velocity/ Feet/Seoond
54.12
36.22
40.11
34.84
A
Stack/Duct Araa, Square Inches
1,320
1,320
1/320
1,320
Qsd
Voluae trie Air Flow Fatm, Dry SCPM*
24,641
16,452
18,629
15,892
Qav
Volumetric Air Flow Kate, Wet ACF*
29,766
19,921
22/061
19,162
%I
Isokinetic 8sapling Bate/ Percent
99.1
100.2
105.2
102.2
• 68*
F (20* C) — 29.92 Inchee of Mercury (8g)
C-2
-------
FIELD DATA AHD RESULTS TABULATION
Contincad
0VT-KM5-7A
KID-m5-7A
OITT-HK5-7C
KXD-m5-7C
TotAl MOD
Poraala Weight, Lb/Ib-Nole
Catch Weight/ Kaoograae
Concentration, ag/DSQt •
Ealaalon Rate, Pounds/Bour
Ealaalon Rata/ Graaa/Sacond
Total DCDD
Faraula Weight, Lb/Lb-Wole
Catch Weight, Nacograae
Concentration, ng/DSOt *
Eolsaloo Rata/ Pouada/Bour
Balaaion Rata* Craaa/Second
Total TriCDD
Fc«rmia Weight, Lb/Lb-Mola
Catch Weight, Ranograaa
Coooentratloa, ng/DSCM *
Kaiition Rata, Pounds/Hour
Kaiaslon Rata, Graaa/Seoond
2378-TCDO
PorauXa Weight/ Lb/Lb-Hole
Catch tfaight, Vasogram
Coaceatratioa, ng/DSCM *
Ealaalon Rata, Pound*/Hour
EaiaalOD Rate, Graaa/Secoad
Other TO»
foTBila Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight/ Ranograaa
Concentration, ng/DSOt •
Balaaloa Rata, PotiDda/Boiir
Ealealoa Rate, Craaa/flecond
12378-PeCDO
Formila Weight/ Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight/ Vaaograaa
Concentration, ng/DSCM •
Balaaloa Rata/ Pounda/Bour
Balaaloa Rata/ Craaa/Second
Other PeCDD
Fowla Weight/ Lb/Lb-Kole
Catch Weight, lanograaa
Concentration, ng/DSCM •
Ealaalon Rata, Pound*/Hour
Balaaloa Rate. Graaa/Seoond
218.35
11.803
4.088*00
3 .742-07
4.712-08
252.90
6.287
2.178*00
1.998-07
2.515-08
267.45
12. *22
4.642*00
4.262-07
5.368-08
322.00
KD (0.013)
UD(4.49B-03)
HD(4.122-10)
HD(5.198-11)
322.00
3.293
1.142*00
1.048-07
1.3 LB-08
356.44
HD (0.023J
ND[7.952-03 J
NDf7.298-10]
HD[9.181-11)
356.44
0.147
5.C8E-02
4.662-09
5.87B-10
218.35
33.394
1.678*01
1.03E-06
1.308-07
252.90
17.645
8.822*00
5.448-07
6.858-08
287.45
53.310
2.66B*01
1.648-06
2.072-07
322.00
XD (0.025)
KD(1.258-02)
KD (7.70B-10)
HD(9.708-11)
322.00
14.050
7.028+00
4.338-07
5. 458-08
356.44
KD (0.035)
¦D (1. 758-02)
¦D (1.082-09)
KD(1.368-10)
356.44
0.432
2.168-01
1.338-08
1.688-09
218.35
KD (0.008)
RD(4.108-03)
HD<2.868-10}
HD{3.618-11)
252.90
51.391
2.648*01
1.848-06
2.328-07
287.45
1.668
8.5SB-01
5.972-08
7.528-09
322.00
KD (0.023)
RD(1.188-02)
HD(8.238-10)
MD{ 1.04E-10)
322.00
0.294
1.512-01
1.058-08
1.338-09
356.44
HD (0.023)
ND(1.168-02)
HD(8.232-10)
ND(1.048-10)
356.44
KD (0.023)
KD(1.18E-02)
RD{8.23E-10)
ND(1.04B-10)
218.35
0.301
1.538-01
9.092-09
1.148-09
252.90
64.541
3.278*01
1.958-06
2.468-07
287.45
1.905
9.662-01
5.758-08
7.258-09
322.00
KD [0.449]
HD12.288-01]
KD[ 1.362-08]
KD{1.712-09)
322.00
0.278
1.418-01
8.398-09
1.068-09
356.44
KD (0.030)
ND (1.528-02)
ND(9.068-10)
HD(1.148-10)
356.44
KD (0.034]
RD[1.728-02]
KD[1.03E-09]
KD (1.292-10]
-------
PIKLD DM* AHD RESULTS TABULATION
Coctisued
KSO
123476-BxCDD
Forsili Weight/ Lb/Lb-Mole
Catcb weight/ Nanograaa
Coecaatration, ng/DSCK *
EaissloQ Rata, Pound*/Boer
Balaaloa Rat*, Graaa/SacoDd
123678-BxCDD
Forsula Weight/ Lb/Lb-ttola
Catch Weight, Vaaograaa
Concantxatloo/ ng/DSCK *
Ralealon Rata/ Ponnda/Hour
Balaaloa Rata, Oxtaa/Secoad
123789-lbcCDD
Porsula Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight/ Haaograaa
Coocaatratloo, ng/DSCM *
Emissloc Rata/ Pounds/Hour
Baiasion Rat*/ Craaa/Secood
Other KxCDO
7crania Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Walght, Kanograaa
Cooceotratloo, og/D8GM *
Sal salon Rata, Pounds/Sour
Balaaloa Rata, Craaa/Sacond
1234678-apCOO
TormalM Valgbt, Lh/Lb-*iole
Catch Valgbt/ Haoograaa
C oncentratlon/ ng/D8CH •
Salaaloa Rate, Pounds/Hour
Balaaloa Rat*/ Oxaaa/Seccad
Othar HpCDO
Fonaila Weight/ Lb/Lb-Mole
Catcb Weight, Nanograaa
Concentration, og/DSQt *
Zalssloa Rata« Pounds/Hour
Ealsalon Rata, Craaa/Secood
OCDD
Poranla Weight/ Lb/Lb-Mole
Catcb Weight/ Kacograaa
Concaotxatiou, og/DSCM *
Salaaloo Rata/ Pounda/Bour
Balaaloa Rat*/ Qraaa/Second
OCT-MH5-7>
390.86
MD (0.020)
ND(6.918-03)
HD(6.342-10)
ND(7.988-11)
390.88
ND (0.015)
ND(5.198-03)
*D(4.75B-10)
ND(5.998-11)
390.88
0.084
2.908-02
2.668-09
3.358-10
390.88
0.377
1.308-01
1.198-08
1.508-09
425.32
0.850
2.948-01
2.698-08
3.398-09
42S.32
0.708
2.458-01
2.248-08
2.838-09
459.76
3.902
1.358*00
1.248-07
1.568-08
XID-MC5-7A
390.86
KD (0.075)
HD(3.758-02)
8D(2.318-09)
KD(2.918-10)
390.88
KD (0.060)
ND(3.008-02)
ND(1.858-09)
ND(2.338-10)
390.88
HD (0.060)
HD(4.008-02)
MD(2.48-09)
ND(3.108-10)
390.88
0.956
4.798-01
2.958-08
3.728-09
425.32
3.453
1.738*00
1.068-07
1.348-08
425.32
3.003
1.508*00
9.258-08
1.178-08
459.76
18.478
9.248*00
5.698-07
7.178-06
OI/T-MK5-7C
390.86
ND (0.035)
ND(1.808-02)
ID(1.258-09)
MD(1.588-10)
390.88
MD (0.028)
KD(1.448-02)
HD(1.008-09)
HD(1.268-10)
390.88
HD (0.036)
MD(1.958-02)
ND(1.368-09)
KD(1.718-10)
390.88
ND (0.033)
ND(1.698-02)
ND(1.188-09)
KD(1.498-10)
425.32
HD (0.124)
MD(6.368-02]
MD[4.448-09)
HD(5.598-10)
425.32
0.089
4.568-02
3.198-09
4.018-10
459.76
0.926
4.758-01
3.318-06
4.188-09
N1D-M4S-7C
390.86
ND (0.050)
XD (2.548-02)
ND(1.518-09)
KD(1.908-10)
390.88
ND (0.043)
ND(2.188-02)
ND(1.308-09)
ND(1.648-10)
390.68
KD (0.055)
HD(2.798-02)
HD(1.668-09)
KD(2.098-10)
390.68
0.074
3.758-02
2.238-09
2.818-10
425.32
KD [0.263]
HD(1.338-01]
KD(7.948-09]
ND{1.008-09)
425.32
ND (0.521)
ND [2.648-01]
HD(1.578-08]
ND(1.988-09]
459.76
2.664
1.458*00
8.658-08
1.098-08
C-4
-------
rZZLD DATA MID RESULTS TASCLATIC*
Continued
PCDP
OITT-W5-7A
HID-WS-7X
OOT-MM5-7C
KID-ft<5-7C
Total HCDP
Foraul* Weight, Lb/Lb-Hole
Catch Weight, nanograms
Concentration ng/DSCM •
Emission Rata, Pounds/Hour
Emission Rat*, Grams/Second
Total DCEP
Fonili Weight, Lb/L2>-Mole
Catch Weight, Haaograme
Concentration, og/D8CH *
2mlssion Rata, Pounds/Boor
Salsaloo Rata, Sraaa/Saoood
Total TzlCSP
Formula Vsight, LbAA Hole
Catch Weight, Nanograas
Concentration, og/DSCM *
Emission Rata, Pounds/Hour
Emission Rata, Crams/Second
2378-TCDP
Porala Weight, Lb/Lb-Hole
Catcb Weight, Kanograme
Concentration, ng/DSCM •
Emission Rate, Pounds/Hoar
Emission Rata, Crams/Second
Other TCOP
Forml* Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catcb Weight, Banograme
Concentration, ng/DSCH •
Emission Rata, Pounds/Hour
Emission Rata, Grams/Second
12378-PeCDF
Formula Weight, Lb/Lb-4tole
Catch Weight, Kanograae
Concentration, og/DSCM •
Emission Rata, Pounds/Hour
Emission Rata, Grams/Second
23478-PeCDP
Formula Weight, Lb/Lb-Hole
Catcb Weight, Xanogtams
Concentration, ng/DSCH *
Emission Rata, Pounds/Hour
Emission Rata, Grams/Second
202.35
66.623
2.302+01
2.112-06
2.66B-07
236.90
84.565
2.928+01
2.682-06
3.38*-07
271.45
33.212
1.152+01
1.052-06
1.338-07
306.00
4.026
1.392+00
1.28S-07
1.611-06
306.00
13.172
4.552+00
•4.1TB-07
S.262-08
340.44
0.717
2.482-01
2.272-08
2.852-09
340.44
3.398
1.17E+00
1.08E-07
1.36E-08
202.35
S98.862
2.991*02
1.842-05
2.32E-06
236.90
373.029
1.862*02
1.15E-05
1.452-06
271.45
112.160
5.612+01
3.452-06
4.35B-07
306.00
15.523
7.762*00
4.782-07
6.02B-08
306.00
57.877
2.892+01
1.782-06
2.252-07
340.44
3.380
1.692+00
2.042-07
3.312-04
340.44
14.506
7.252+00
4.472-07
5.632-08
202.35
JCD (2.925]
«D(1.502+00]
NDj1.052-07]
ND[ 1.32B-08]
236.90
6.899
3.542+00
2.472-07
3.112-08
271.45
7.322
3.762+00
2.622-07
3.302-08
306.00
0.S52
2.832-01
1.982-08
2.491-09
306.00
1.948
9.992-01
6.972-08
8.762-09
340.44
0.061
3.132-02
2.IBS-09
2.75S-10
340.44
0.229
1.172-01
8.202-09
1.032-09
202.35
11.065
5.612+00
3.342-07
4.212-08
236.90
25.597
1.302+01
7.732-07
9.742-08
271.45
8.567
4.342+00
2.592-07
3.262-08
306.00
2.208
1.122*00
6.672-08
8.402-09
306.00
6.292
3.192+00
1.902-07
2.392-08
340.44
0.198
1.002-01
5.982-09
7.532-10
340.44
0.859
4.362-01
2.592-08
3.272-09
C-5
-------
FIELD CAXA AMD RESULTS XASULAIIOK
Continued
PCDT
OUT-W45-7*
>CD-m5-7A
OOT-HK5-7C
MIO-lf45-?C
Other PeCDF
Poraula weight, ib/Lb-Mole
Catch Waight, Ifanograaa
Concentration, ng/DSOi *
KalssioQ Rate, Pounds/Hour
Emission Rata, Orans/Secood
123478-BxOSF
. Porwla Weight, Lb/Lb-Kola
Catch Weight, Kanograaa
Concentration, ng/DSOt *
Emission Rata, Pouadattour
Smlaaion Xat«, Craaa/Secood
123678-8x0)?
Porvnla Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight, Kanograaa
Coccentratioc, ng/DSCM *
Emission Rata, Pounds/Hour
Salsalon Rata, Craaa/Secood
234678-BXCDF
Foroula Weight, Lb/Lb-Mola
Catch Weight, Hanograaa
Concentration, ng/DSOi *
EaiaaiOB Rata, Pounds/Hour
Salsaloo Rata, Craos/Sacond
123789-HxCDP
PorvuXa Weight, Lb/Lb-Hoi a
Catch Weight, Kanograaa
concentration, og/USCH *
Emission Rata, Pounds/Hour
Ealaaloo Rata, Craaa/Secood
Other ExCDF
Parm:la Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight, Hanograaa
Concentration, ng/DSCH *
Ealaaloo Rate, Pounds/Hour
Salaaloa Rate, Oraaa/Second
1234678-BpCDF
Forsila Weight, Lb/Lb-Hole
Catch Weight, Vanograaa
Concentration, cg/DSQt *
Balsaion Rata, Pounds/Eour
Ealaalon Rata, Craaa/3eooad
340.44
10.473
3.628*00
3.328-07
4.188-08
374.88
0.757
2.628-01
2.408-08
3.028-09
374.88
0.269
9.308-02
8.528-09
1.078-09
374.88
0.545
1.888-01
1.738-08
2.188-09
374.88
D (0.023)
*D(7.958-03)
HD(7.298-10)
188-11)
374.88
1.469
S.088-01
4.658-08
5.868-09
409.32
0.307
1.068-01
9.738-09
1.238-09
340.44
54.211
2.718*01
1.678-06
2.108-07
374.88
3.572
1.798*00
1.108-07
1.398-08
374.88
0.756
3.788-01
2.338-08
2.938-09
374.88
2.262
1.148*00
7.038-08
8.868-09
374.88
KD (0.090)
KD C 4.50B-O2)
KD(2.77E-09)
*D(3.498-10)
374.88
6.245
3.128*00
1.928-07
2.428-08
409.32
KD [1.713)
KD[6.568-01]
HD(5.28E-08)
ND [6.658-09]
340.44
1.127
5.788-01
4.038-08
5.088-09
374.88
0.048
2.468-02
1.728-09
2.168-10
374.88
KD (0.020)
HD(1.038-02)
MD(7.168-10)
HD(9.028-11)
374.88
KD (0.030)
KD(1.548-02)
RC(1.078-09)
HD(1.358-10)
374.88
HD (0.040)
KD(2.058-02)
HD(1.438-09)
RD( 1.808-10)
374.88
0.070
3.598-02
2.512-09
3.168-10
409.32
0.049
2.518-02
1.75B-09
2.218-10
340.44
3.686
1.878*00
1.118-07
1.408-08
374.68
KD (0.228)
KD[1.168-01]
HD(6.888-09]
KD(8.678-10J
374.88
0.071
3.60E-02
2.148-09
2.708-10
374.88
0.114
5.788-02
3.448-09
4.348-10
374.88
KD (0.058)
KD(2.948-02)
ND(1.758-09)
MD(2.218-10)
374.88
0.339
1.728-01
1.028-08
1.298-09
409.32
0.122
6.198-02
3.688-09
4.648-10
C-6
-------
FIELD MIA AHD BXSULtS TABULATION
Coatinoad
PCTP
1234789-BpCDP
Pomla weight, Lb/Lb-Hol«
Catch Weight/ Kanograaa
Conoantxatloa, og/DSQf *
Salaaloa Rata, Pounds/Sour
S&IbbIoq Hate, Craaa/Secoad
Othar HpCD?
Poraula Weight/ Lb/Lb-MoI«
Catch Valgbt, Sanogrua
Concentration, og/OdCM *
Baiaaion Rata, Pounds/Boor
Ealaalon Rata, Gxaa*/S*cood
OOP
Fannul* V*ight, Lb/lb-Mal«
Catch Waiglrt, Manograaa
Concentration, ng/DSCM *
Salaaloa Rata, Pounda/Bour
Eaiaaion Rata, GrAM/Sccoud
C-7
OOT-W5-7A
0UT-MHS-7C
MID-»#!5-7C
409.32
0.031
1.072-02
9.628-10
1.242-10
409. 32
MD (0.115)
KD(S.758-02)
ND( 3.548-09)
KD (4.462-10)
409.32
TO (0.043)
KD( 2.2LE-02)
ND{1.542-09)
TO(1.94E-10)
409.32
KD (0.063)
JB>(3.192-02)
KD(1.908-09)
KD(2.401-10}
409.32
0. 234
8.098-02
7.412-09
9.348-10
409.32
1.197
S.982-01
3.692-06
4.652-09
409.32
0.013
6.672-03
4.652-10
5.862-11
409.32
0.035
1.772-02
1.068-09
1.332-10
443.76
0.173
5.9&S-02
5.488-09
6.912-10
443.76
3.333
1.678*00
1.032-07
1.292-06
443.76
KD (0.058)
HD<2.972-02)
HD(2.082-09)
ND(2.622-1")
443.76
XD (0.206)
ND(1.042-01)
RD[6.222-09)
ND(7.842-10]
-------
MELD DAXK AND RESULTS TABUIATIO*
SRKITOLAXILB
Coatiouad
Phaool
Formula Walght, Lb/Lb-Mola
Catch Weight, Kicrograaa
Cceoantxatlco, ag/DSCN *
Emission Rata, Pounda/Sour
Balsaloo Rata, Crama/Secood
blB(2-ChIoroethyl )athar
Porala Vaiytt, Lb/Lb-Mola
Catch Vaight, Klcrograas
Coacaot-ratioo, og/DSCN *
Baiaalon Rata, Poanda/Hour
Ealssloa Fata, Grama/Sacond
2-Chloropbaaol
Pormila Vai^it, Lb/Lb-Mola
Catcb valffht, Mlcrograaa
Coocaatratloa, og/DSCK •
Xmiaaloo Rata, Pounda/Bour
Eaiaaloa Rata, Qraats/Sacood
1,3-DlchlGrobeMao#
rorula Vaigkt, Lb/Lb-Hola
catcb Vntfbt, Micrograms
Concentration, og/DSOt *
Salsaloo Rata, Fouods/Boux
Emission Rata, Craas/Sacond
1/4-Dichlorobaa tana
Pormil* Vaigfat, Lb/Lb-Mola
Catch Waight, Microgram*
Ccncantratlao, bg/DSCH *
XaiaaloD Rata, Pounds/Botir
BalsaIon Rata/ Ccana/Sacood
Baaxyl alcohol
Formula Valght/ Lb/Lb-Kola
Catcb Valgfat, Micrograms
Coocaatratloo/ og/DSCM *
Kmiasloa Rata, Poands/Boux
Kai salon Rata, Grasa/Sacond
1,2-0lohlorobaoxaoa
Formula Walgbt, Lb/Lb-Mola
Catch Valgbt/ Micrograms
Co&oantratioo, og/D3CM *
Emission Rata, Pounds/Hour
Eaiaaloo Rata, Crams/Second
OVT-MMS-7A
94.11
ND (2.410)
M>(8.33Bt02)
MD(7.632-05)
HD(9.621-06)
143.02
XD (2.980)
KD(1.032*03)
KD(9.442-05)
KD(1.192-05}
129.56
KD (2.940)
HD(1.022*03)
HD(9.312-05)
CT)( 1.172-05)
147.00
HD (2.500)
l»0( 8.642*02)
*0(7.922-05)
ND(9.982-06)
147.00
89.010
3.082*04
2.822-03
3.5 SB-04
108.14
2315.050
8.001*05
7.332-02
9.242-03
147.00
74.160
2.562*04
2.352-03
2.962-04
MID-m5-7A
94.11
ND (2.330}
XD(1.162*03)
MD(7.182-05)
XZ>(9. CiB-06)
143.02
ND (2.880)
HD{1.442*03)
HD(8.872-05)
ND(1.122-05)
128.56
ND (2.850)
KD(1.422*03)
KD(8 .7&E-05)
KD( 1.11X-05)
147.00
HD (2.420)
MD(1.215*03}
ND(7.452-05)
ND{9.392-06)
147.00
66.730
3.34E*04
2.062-03
2.592-04
108.14
2248.080
1.122+06
6.921-02
8.738-03
147.00
53.450
2.671*04
1.65B-03
2.07E-04
OUI-MM5-7C
94.11
342.870
1.762*05
1.232-02
1.552-03
143.02
KD (4.170)
ND(2.142*03)
MD(1.492-04)
HD(1.882-05)
128.56
HD (4.120)
HD(2.112*03)
KD(1.472-04}
KD(1.862-05}
147.00
KD (3.500)
ND(1.802*03)
HD(1.252-04)
HD(1.582-05)
147.00
KD (3.360)
KD(1.722*03)
KD(1.202-04)
KD(1.522-05)
108.14
7987.230
4.102*06
2.862-01
3.602-02
147.00
KD [9.370]
ND(4.812*03)
ND(3.352-04]
HD(4.232-05]
MJD-m5-7C
94.11
320.090
1.622*05
9.662-03
1.228-03
143.02
ND (3.110)
HD(1.582*03)
ND(9.392-05)
HD(1.182-05)
128.56
KD (3.080)
KD(1.562+03)
ND{9.302-05)
KD (1.172-05)
147.00
IB (2.620)
RD(1.332*03)
KD(7.912-05)
KD(9.972-06)
147.00
RD (2.510)
MD(1.272*03)
HD(7.582-05)
HD(9.552-06)
108.14
7755.300
3.932*06
2.342-01
2.952-02
147.00
HD [9.760]
HD(4.952*03)
HD(2.95B-04]
HD{3.712-05]
C-8
-------
FIELD DATk ARD RESULTS TABULATION
SZKTVDLATIL8
Continued
2-Mathylpt»aool
Formula Valght, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight, Mlcrogxasa
Concentration, ng/D3CM *
BbImIoq Rata, Pounds/Boor
Salsalon !Utif Craoa/Socood
bis(2 -Chiorolaopropyl)athar
Poraula Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight, Microgram
Concentration, ng/DSCM •
Salsalon Rat*, Pounda/Hour
Salssloa Rata, Graaa/Seoond
4-Hetbylpbenol
Panola waight, Lb/Lb-Hal#
Catch Weight, Hlcxograaa
Conoentratloo, og/DSCM *
Salsalon Rata, Pound*/Hoar
Baiaalon Rata Craaa/Saoond
M-Nltroao-dl-n-propylaal&a
Porsola Weight, Lb/Lb-Kole
Catch Weight/ Mlcrograaa
Concentration, ng/DSCM *
Emission Rata, Pounds/Hour
Xalaslon Rata, Oraaa/Seoond
Baxachloroethane
Foral la Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight, Klcrograaa
Concentration, og/bSCM *
Emission Jlata. Pound*/Boor
Eaiaaioo Rata, Cms/Second
Vltrobenxene
P©r*ula Walght, Lb/Lb-ftola
Catcb Weight, Micrograms
Conoentratloo, ug/ESCM •
Emission Rata, Pounds/Boar
Emission Rata, Craaa/Seoocid
laophoroae
Porsula Walght, Lb/Lb-Hole
Catcb Walght, Microglias
Concentration, ng/DSCM *
Emission Rata, Pounds/Hour
Ealaslon Rata, Graaa/Secoad
OUT-MM5-7A
108.14
ND (3.150)
MD(1.098*03)
ND(9.988-05)
HD(1.268-05)
171.07
ND (1.540)
ND(5.328*02)
ND(4.868-05)
KD(6.15B-06)
106.14
ID (3.580)
ND(1.248*03)
HD(l.138-04)
ND(1.438-05)
130.22
KD (3.370)
ND(1.17R*03)
KD (1.078-04)
ND(1.358-05)
236.74
RD (11.350)
WD(3.928*03)
ND(3.608-04)
ND(4.538-05)
123.11
RD (1.030)
MD(3.568+02)
HD( 3.268-05)
HD(4.118-06)
138.21
ND (0.660)
ND(2.268*02)
ND(2.098-05)
KD(2.638-06)
MID-m5-7A
108.14
ND (3.050)
ND(1.52B+03)
RD (9.408-05)
RD(1.188-05)
171.07
ND (1.490)
ND(7.458*02)
RD(4.598-05)
RD(5.768-06)
108.14
MD (3.460)
MD(1.738*03)
ND(1.078-04)
MD(1.348-05)
130.22
ND (3.260)
RD(1.63B+03)
ND(1.008-04)
HD(1.278-05)
236.74
HD (10.970)
ND(5.468*03)
ND(3.388-04)
KD (4.26E-05)
123.11
ND (1.300)
ND(6.508*02)
ND(4.008-05)
ND(5.058-06)
138.21
ND (0.830)
ND(4.158*02)
KD (2.56E-05 )
ND(3.228-06)
OVT-MK5-7C
108.14
KD (15.200]
ND(7.808*03)
HD[5.448-04]
ND[6.858-05]
171.07
ND (2.160)
ND(1.118*03)
ND(7.738-05)
ND(9.748-06)
108.14
41.240
2.128*04
1.488-03
1.868-04
130.22
ND (4.720)
HD(2.428*03)
RD(1.698-04)
ND<2.138-05)
236.74
ND (15.900)
HD(8.158+03)
ND{5.698-04)
ND(7.178-05)
123.11
ND (2.790)
ND(1.438*03)
ND(9.99B-05)
RD(1.268-05)
138.21
ND (1.790)
ND(9.188*02)
ND(6.418-05)
ND(8.078-06)
KID-W5-7C
108.14
ND (3.300)
RD(1.678*03)
HD(9.968-05)
ND(1.268-05)
171.07
ND (1.610)
ND(8.168*02)
ND(4.868-05)
ND(6.128-06)
106.14
40.550
2.068*04
1.228-03
1.548-04
130.22
MD (3.520)
ND(1.798*03)
ND( 1.068-04)
ND(1.348-05)
236.74
KD (11.670)
ND(6.028*03)
ND(3.588-04)
ND(4.528-05)
123.11
ND (2.640)
ND(1.448*03)
KD(8.578-05)
KD (1.082-05)
138.21
ND (1.820)
ND(9.238*02)
KD( 5.49B-05)
ND(6.928-06)
C-9
-------
7XXLD DATA AMD R23UIT3 TA8ULATICHI
saavaL/aisA
Continued
2-Nltxophecol
rorsala Weight, Lb/Lb-Mola
Catch W«lght, Hlcrograaa
Concentration, og/D8CH *
Ealaaloa Rat*, Pound*/Hour
Saiaaioa Rat*, Graaa/Seoond
3 , 4-Oiaathylphenol
raraula Weight, Lb/Lb-Mol«
Catch Weight, Hlcrograaa
Coocantratlon, ng/DSCM *
Ealssioo Rate, Touoda/Hour
Ealaaloa Rate, Craae/Second
Beaxolc acid
Poranl* Walgbt, Lb/Lb-Kola
Catch Weight, Hlcrograaa
Concentration, og/DSOt *
XhImIoo Sat*, Pounda/Hour
Kalaaioo Rata, flraaa/Secood
bi«(2-ChloroethcQcy)Bethaae
Poraul* Weight, Lb/Lb-Hole
Catch Weight, Hlcrograaa
Concentration, ng/DSCM •
gal—loa Rate, Pound#/Hour
2aiaalon Rate, Craaa/Seoood
2,4-Olchloropheool
Toraula Weight, Lb/Lb-Kola
Catch weight, Hlcrograaa
Coocentratioo, ng/DSO *
Kalaaioo Rate, Pounda/Boux
Ealaaloa Rate, Oraas/Second
1,2,4-Trlchlorobeaxana
Formila Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight, Kicrograaa
Concentration, ag/DflCM *
Salaaion Rate, Pounda/Bour
Ealaaloa Rate, Cra&a/3ecood
Xaphthaleae
forauLa Weight, Ib/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight, Kicrograaa
Concentration, ng/D3CM *
Ealaaloa Rate, Pounda/Boar
Ealaaloa Rate, Craaa/Beoood
OJT-KH5-7A
139.11
$66,140
1.962+05
1.802-02
2.272-03
124.17
HE (1.640)
KD(5.678+02)
8D(5.202-05)
KD(6.55B-06)
122.12
6242.960
2.652+06
2.612-01
3.291-02
155.04
JR) (1.590)
ND( 5.508+02)
KD(3.048-05)
NC(6.352-06)
- - 163.00
HD (1.660)
HD(5.612*02)
KD( 5.322-05)
TO( 6.712-06)
261.45
2021.010
6.992+05
6.402-02
6.072-03
126.17
2624.160
9.762+05
6.952-02
1.138-02
M1C-M4S-7A
139.11
567.680
2.642+05
1.752-02
2.202-03
124.17
KD (2.060)
KD(1.042+03)
KD (6.412-05)
KD (8.072-06)
122.12
6440.530
3.228+06
1.982-01
2.502-02
155.04
HD (2.000)
M0(1.002+03)
KD(6.168-05)
HD(7.762-06)
163.00
KD (2.120)
HD(1.062+03)
KD(6.532-05)
KD(8.232-06)
161.45
1536.060
7.662+05
4.732-02
5.962-03
121.17
1729.050
6.642+05
5.338-02
6.712-03
OVT-W5-7C
139.11
64.070
4.312+04
3.012-03
3.798-04
124.17
KD (4.470)
ND(2.29B+03)
ND( 1.60B-04)
HD(2.02E-0S)
122.12
9926.190
5.092*06
3.552-01
4.462-02
155.04
KD (4.310)
KD(2.212+03)
*0(1.548-04)
ND(1.942-05)
163.00
KD (4.560)
KD(2.342+03)
TO(1.632-04)
K>(2.062-05)
m. 45
HD (2.710)
MD(1.398+03)
KD(9.702-05)
*D(1.22Z-05)
126.17
KD (1.410)
HD(7.232+02)
HD(5.058-05)
KD(6.36S-06)
M1D-4M5-7C
139.11
150.740
7.648+04
4.552-03
5.738-04
124.17
XD (4.560)
HD(2.312+03)
KD(1.368-04}
MD(1.732-05)
122.12
6364.710
4.242+06
2.532-01
3.168-02
155.04
KD (4.400)
ND(2.238+03)
RD<1.318-04)
MS(1.672-05)
163.00
HD (4.650)
»(2.361+03)
»(1.408-04)
(0(1.771-05)
161.45
KD (2.770)
KD(1.402+03)
R)(l.362-09)
HD(1.051-05)
126.17
KD (1.U0)
M>(7.308+02)
KD(4.3S2-05)
ND(5.488-06)
C-10
-------
flED LXZA AMD R2SULXS TABULATION
SSMTVOZATXIX
Coatinuad
4-Cfclcroaailiaa
Parala Waigbt, Lb/Lb-Kola
Catch V«ight, Hlcrograaa
coooaatxatioo, og/DSCM *
Bmlaalon Rit«( Pouoda/Bour
talaaloa KaU, Oraaa/Saooad
Baarachlorobutadlana
ForaolJ Weight, Lb/Lb-Mala
Catch Waight, Hlcrograaa
Coccantratioe, ag/MCH •
Kmlitlon IUU, Fouada/Bour
Salsaioo Rata, Oraaa/Sacoad
4-Chlcro-3-aathylpbaool
7arm; 1a Walght, Lb/Lb-Kala
Catch Valgbt, Hlcrograaa
Coacaetxatloa, og/DSCH *
2al««loo XiU, Poanda/Hour
teisftloD Rats, Cra&a/Saooad
2-Hathylfiapbthalana
Foraula Val?bt, Lb/Lb-Hola
Catch waight, Hlcrograaa
Caooaatratloc, &g/DSOt •
CbImIoq Rata, Pounda/Boar
EbImIos Fata, Craaa/Sacoad
BaBtachlcxocyclopaotadlaoa
Foraila Vaigbt, Lb/Lb-Mola
Catch Vaigbt, Hlcrograaa
Coocaatratioo, vq/MQi *
Calaaloa Rata, Pounda/Eour
2alaalo& Rata, Qraaa/Saoond
2,4.6-Trlcblorophacol
Poraila Walght, Lb/Lb Hola
catch Waight, Hlcrograaa
Coooaatratlon, og/DOOf *
Xmlaaloa Rata, Pound*/Hour
Xmiaaioo Rata/ Gr«u/8aoood
2,4,5-Trlchlorophaool
Foranla Waight, Lb/Lfc-4tola
Catch Valght, Hlcrograaa
Caacantratloo, ng/DAO< *
Emission Rata, Pounda/Bour
Kalaaloa Rata, Qraaa/Saoood
WI-KH5-7A
127.57
ID (2.460)
KD(8.502*02)
KD(7.792-05)
*D(9.822-06)
260.76
MD (2.420)
MD(8.371*02)
!&(?.672-05)
BD(9,668-06)
142.59
HD (1.940)
ND(6.712*02)
HD(6.152-05)
MD(7.742-06)
142.20
12S.400
4.341*04
3.971-03
5.012-04
272.77
2D (10.660}
MD(3.692*03)
ND(3.382-04)
HD(4.262-0S)
197.45
MD (3.230)
HD(1.122*03)
KD(1.022-04)
KD(1.292-05)
197.45
MS (2.580)
MD(8.928*02)
ND(8.172-05)
MD(1.032-05)
KID->#t5-7A
127.57
ID (3.11C)
10(1.558*03)
ND(9.582-05)
K0(1.212-05)
260.76
HD (3.070)
ND(1.538*03)
HD(9.462-05)
ND(1.192-05)
142.59
MD (2.450)
MD(1.222*03)
RD(7.552-05)
10(9.512-06)
142.20
91.030
4.552*04
2.802-03
3.532-04
272.77
2D (12.240)
KD(6.122*03)
KD(3.772-04)
MD(4.752-05)
197.45
KD (3.710)
10(1.652*03)
2D(1.142-04)
ND(1.442-05)
197.45
KD (2.960)
ND(1.462*03)
XD{9.122-05)
HD(1.158-05)
ocr-ms-7c
127.57
HD (6.690)
MD(3.438*03)
KD(2.392-04)
MD(3.022-05)
260.76
KD (6.590)
MD(3.382*03)
HD(2.362-04)
WD(2.97B-05)
142.59
MD (5.280)
MD(2.712*03)
KD(1.892-04)
MD(2.382-05)
142.20
MD (2.100)
KD(1.082*03)
HD(7.522-05)
MD(9.478-06)
272.77
MD (15.860)
«D(8.138*03)
KD(5.682-04)
*0(7.158-05)
197.45
WO (4.820)
20(2.472*03)
HD(1.738-04)
ND(2.172-05)
197.45
HD (3.840)
MD(1.978*03)
MD(1.378-04)
HD(1.732-05)
KZD-MC-7C
127.57
MD (6.830)
HD(3.462*03)
RD(2.062-04)
KD(2.602-05)
260.76
KD (6.730)
KD(3.412*03)
MD(2.032-04)
KD(2.562-05)
142.59
MD (5.380)
XD(2.712*03)
MD(1.622-04)
MD(2.052-05)
142.20
KD (2.140)
»(1.092*03)
HD(6.462-05)
KD(8.142-06)
272.77
KD (13.820)
KD(7.012*03)
KD(4.172-04)
KD(5.262-05)
197.45
KD (4.200)
XD(2.132*03)
ND(1.272-04)
KD(1.602-05)
197.45
KD (3.340)
KD(1.692*03)
10(1.012-04)
KD(1.272-09)
C-ll
-------
PISLD
DATA AID RESULTS tABULAIIOH
SEKIVOLATXL8
Cootlauad
2-Cblaronaphtbalaoa
Porvala Valght, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch valght, Microgram#
Cooeaotratloa, og/D30t *
Snlssloo Rata, Pounds/Hour
lalaaloa Rata, Crama/Sacoad
2-Kltroaall±aa
rorsulA Valght, U>/Lb-«ola
Catch Valght, Microgram*
Concentration, ag/DSCM *
Salaaloa Rata, Pounda/Bowr
Sadaaloo Rata, Qraaa/Saeoad
Dlaatbylpbtba-lata
Foraula Valght, Lb/Lb-Mola
Catch Valght, Microgram*
Coecaatxatico, ag/D8CM *
£alaaloa Rata, Pounds/Boor
Kalaaioo Rata, Graaa/Saoood
Acaaaphtbylaoa
Formila Valght, Lb/Lb Hola
Catch valght, Mlcrograaa
Coocaatratioo, og/DSCN *
Salaalon Rata, Pouada/Boor
Ealaaloa Rata, Graaa/Saooad
3-HltroAalllDa
Ponula Valght, Lb/Lb-Hola
Catch Valght, Klcrograaa
Coocaatxatloa, ag/DSCM *
Xalaaloa Rata, Poaada/Boux
Salaaloa Rata, Graaa/Sacoad
Acanapfctbana
Poranla valght, Lb/Lb-Mola
Catch Valght, Mlcrograaa
Coocaotratloo, ag/DSCH *
Salaaloa Rata, Pouada/Bour
Salaaloa Rata, Craaa/Saooad
2,4-Clnltropbaool
Poraula Valght, Lb/Lb-ttole
Catch Valght, Mlcrograaa
Coocaotntloo, ag/DSGM *
Salaaloa Rata, Pouada/Boor
Salaaloa Rata, Graaa/Saoond
WT-MM3-7A
162.62
KD (1.340)
RP(4.638+02}
*0(4.258-05)
HP(S.358-06}
138.13
*0 (2.970)
*D(1.038*03)
*0<9.411-05)
*0(1.198-05)
194.19
KD <1.140)
ND(3.948+02)
HD(3.618-05)
*0(4.551-06)
152.20
KD (1.040)
VD(3.608+02)
ND(3.298-05)
*D(4.158-06)
131.13
HD (9.520)
*D(3.298+03)
KD(3.028-04)
KD(3.801-05)
154.21
KD (1.390)
HD(4.778+02)
RD(4.371-05)
MD(5.511-06)
184.11
HD (19.580)
KD(6.778+03)
KD(6.208-04)
90(7.822-05)
MX3-)*(S-7A
142.62
RD (1.540)
®(7.708+02)
®(4.741-05)
MD(5.988-06)
138.13
KD (3.410)
ND(1.708+03)
XQ (1.058-04)
ND( 1.328-05)
194.19
RD (1.310)
KD(6.3S8+02)
HD(4.04B-05)
*D(5.088-06)
152.20
KD (1.190)
ND(5.953*02)
ND(3.678-05)
KD [4.628-06)
138.13
KD (10.930)
HD(5.468+03)
KD(3.371-04)
ND(4.248-05)
154.21
ND (1.580)
KD(7.908+02)
KD(4.178-05)
10(6.138-06)
184.11
KD (100.990)
ND(5.C5S+04)
KD(3.111-03)
ND(3.928-04)
OOT-MK3-7C
162.62
HD (1.990}
*0(1.028*03)
HD(7.121-05)
KD(8.978-06)
138.13
HD (4.430)
KD(2.27S+03)
*D(1.598-04)
KO( 2.008-05)
194.19
HD (1.700)
MD(I.728+02)
HD(6.088-05)
ND(7.C78-06)
152.20
ND (1.550)
KD(7.958+02)
RD( 5.558-05)
MD(6.991-06)
138.13
ND (14.170)
KD(7.271+03)
(10(5.078-04)
ND(6.398-05)
154.21
RD (2.050)
HD(1. 058+03)
KD(7.348-05)
XD(9.24B-06)
184.11
ND (29.ISO)
ND(1.508+04)
*0(1.041-03)
*0(1.3U-04)
N2D-mS-7C
162.62
m (1.740)
RD(8.821+02)
RD(5.258-05)
KD(6.628-06)
138.13
RD (3.860)
ND(1.968+03)
RD(1.178-04)
ND(1.478-03)
194.19
HD (1.480)
ND(7.511+02)
KD{4.471-05)
ND(5.638-06)
152.20
ND (1.350)
RD(6.158+02)
MD(4.088-05)
ND(5.148-06)
138.13
MC (12.340)
HD(6.268+03)
RD(3.731-04)
RD(4.698-C5)
154.21
KD (1.790)
HD(9.088+02)
ND(S.408-05)
ND (6.818-06)
184.11
ND (25.390)
ND (1.29S+04)
HD(7.678-04)
ND(9.668-05)
C-12
-------
PI ELS
5*3* UD RMULTS Sfc8tlLASX€K
SSXXVOLWILl
OeatlAUMl
4-Kltrophaiiol
Fotwila w*igfct, u»/Lb-Kela
Catch weight, Hicrogxiwi
Coeoaotratioo, oq/DWQl *
SalMios Rata^ Pouods/Hour
Sbdaaioa IUU, Craaa/6aeoad
Bibaexofuran
ronsuU Waigfct, l»b/X4>-«ol»
Catch weight* JCicxograaa
Caooantratiea, ag/DSCH *
K&laalon Rata, Fouads/Bour
Ealaaion Rat*, Ct«m/Saoood
2,4 -©inltroteloaea
Fanoula Waifbt, LhrtJ>-Kolt
Catch Waight, Microgram*
Coec*atration, og/DSCM •
Eaiaaioa Rata, Pouadi/Souy
laiaaioc Rata, Crubt/Saooad
2#6-Oi»itrotoluaMi
faxmtU »*l?ht, Lb/X»-Mala
Catcfe Waight, Kicrogra**
Coec^ntxatioe, aj/cao* *
SsiaalOB Sat#, S»oua4a/aoui
Xalaaioa Rata, Graaa/Sacond
Diathylphthalata
Foraela Waigbt, l»b/Lb-*ca*
Catch Vaight, Hierograaa
CaaaautratioB, og/DSOt *
taisaios Rata, Pounda/Bour
Ealsaioa Rata, Craaa/Sacoad
4-CIU.oropti«ayl-p6aoyl«Uiax
Poraula Weight, Lb/Lto-«ola
Catch tfalght, Klczo^raaa
Conoaotratiew, ngfesCH *
Kstiaaloa Rata, Pouadaftacur
amission Rata, Orana/Saoosd
Fluoucaaa
Formula Vaight, X,b/Ii>-«ola
Catch Vaight, Kierograa#
Coccantratioo, ag/WOi *
Kalaaioa Rat#, fouada/Xour
Kalsaioc Rata, Sraaa/laoood
Gt/r-«K5-?A
139.11
KD 118.3401
*0(6.341*03)
HE (5.111-54)
i®{ 7.321-05}
168.20
130.970
4.521*04
4.158-03
5.221-04
182.14
IS (4.900)
MD(l.«Z»tt)
ITD(X. 521-04)
921-05}
182.14
19 <5.CIO)
*D(1.941*03)
i©( 1.781-04)
M5{ 2.241-05)
222.24
XD (1.500}
J©(5.191*02)
SD(4.758-05}
*D (1.770)
MD(ft.»58»02)
®{5.458-05|
KD<6 ,B7l-C§|
166,22
O (1.250)
*0(6,251*02)
IB( J. 85X-OS)
»{4.851-06)
OUt-«M5-7C
139.11
189.920
9.748*04
6.308-03
8.5Q-04
163.20
m [8.890J
HD(4.562*03)
KD{3.111-04]
KD[4.01X-05]
182.14
m (7.140)
1B< 2,561-04)
8D(3.22B-Q5)
112.14
KB (f-350)
(TO (4.288*03)
ID(2,991-04)
W>(3.771-05)
222.24
V0 (2.230)
80(1.141*03)
!©(?.988-05)
SD(l.GL2-05)
204.24
KO (2.300)
XD(1.111*03)
*0(8.211-05)
*0(2.041-05)
166.22
KD (1.620)
MD(8«J»*02)
K!>( 5.808-05)
SD[7.31E-06)
HUM4K5-7C
139.11
2846.330
1.441*06
1.598-02
1.081-02
168.20
HD (1.110)
ND(S.631*02)
SD(3.351-C5)
RD(4.221-06}
182.14
KD (6.220)
XD( 3.151*03)
KDC1.88X-04)
8D(2.37*-?5)
182.14
XD (7.270)
HD(3.691*033
H>{2.1S1-04)
KD(2.771-05}
222.24
US {1.950}
XD(9<89S*02)
(03(5.698-05)
»(7.421-C6}
204.24
KD (2.000)
MD(1.011*03)
KD(6.041-05)
KD(7.611-06)
166.22
KD (1.410)
ND(7.151*02}
KD(4.251-05)
HD{5.368-06)
. C-13
-------
FIELD
DATA MD RESULTS TABULATION
SXKXVOLATX1S
Continued
4-Ritroaalllna
fomli Walght, Lb/Lb-Mol*
Catch waight, Microgxasa
Caooairtratioa, &g/DSCM *
^laaios Rata, Pounds/Hoar
Kaluloa Rata, Gtasa/Sacood
4,6-Oinltro-2-®athylpbaool
Formila Weight, Lb/Lb-Mola
Catch valght, Klcrograjas
Concentration, og/DSCH *
Bsiaaiofi Rata, Pounds/Hour
2al*«lon Rata, Orana/Sacond
V-Mltroaodlpfc«nylaBiA«( 1)
Foraula V*lght, Ib/Xb-Mola
Catch Weight., Mlorograsa
Coeooatratioo/ ng/CACM *
Balaaloo Rata, Pouoda/Bour
E&liaioo !Uta, Qrana/Sacocd
4-BroaoptMayl -pbanylathar
FocmilA Weight, Lb/Lb-Mel*
Catch Wtight, Hlcrograaa
Ccnoantratloo, og/DSQt *
Baiuloa Rat*/ Pounds/Bour
SalMloo lUt*, 0raas/8*coad
B«acftlorobn xaca
Pomila Valght, Lb/Lb-Hola
Catch Valght, Micrograms
Coccaotratlca, og/D8CH *
BalMlon Rata, Pound*/Bour
BnlssioQ Rata, Oraaa/Saooad
Paotachloropbaool
Foraila Valght, Lb/Lb-Mola
Catch Valght, Mlccogcaaa
Coocactratlan, ng/DSOf •
Ealaaloa Rata, Pound*/Bour
Baistlon Rata, Oraaa/Saoond
PhanADttLr«A«
Formula Valght, Lb/Lb-Kola
Catch Valght, Klcrograaa
Coocaatratioe, og/DSCM *
Kalssloa Rata, Poonda/Bour
Balsaloo Rata, Craas/Sacood
OVT-MH5-7H
131.13
KD (10.470]
HD(3.622+03)
KD(3.322-04)
XD(4.16*-05)
196.13
I© (21.140)
KD(7.312*03)
XD(6.70B-O4)
KD(8.442-05)
198.13
XD (1.970)
KD(6.812+02)
XD(6.242-05)
XD(7.8*2-06)
249.11
KD (4.620)
KD{1.672+03)
HD(1.532-04)
KD(1.922-05)
264.76
XD (3.170)
XD( 1.862+03]
XD( 1.702-04)
KD(2.148-05)
266.34
KD (24.690)
HD(6.542+03)
KD(7.822-04)
KD(9.662-05)
178.23
129.940
4.492+04
4.122-03
5.192-04
KID-H45-7A
138.13
KD (12.020)
KD(6.012+03)
KD (3. 7QX-C4)
KD(4.672-05)
198.13
HD (19.530)
HD(9.762+03)
HD(6.022-04)
KD(7.582-05)
196.13
KD (1.820)
KD(9.1Q2+02)
KD(5.612-05)
XD(7.06Jt-06)
249.11
KD (4.450)
ND(2.222*03)
*D(1.372-04)
KD(1.732-05)
284.76
XD (4.960)
XD(2.482+03)
KD(1.532-04)
KC(1.932-05)
266.34
XD (22.620)
XD(1.142+04)
KD(7.032-04)
KD( 8.862-05)
178.23
66.870
3.342+04
2.062-03
2.602-04
CX7T-KK5-7C
136.13
KD (15.590)
XD(8.002+03)
HD(5.582-04)
KD(7.032-05)
198.13
MD (22.830)
XD(1.172+04)
KD(8.172-04)
KD(1.032-04)
198.13
XD (2.120)
XD(1.092+03)
*D(7.592-05)
KD(9.562-06)
249.11
KD (5.210)
*D(2.672+03)
HD(1.862-04)
KD(2.352-05)
284.76
HD (5.600)
HD(2.972+03)
KD(2.082-04)
HD(2.622-05)
266.34
XD (26.670)
KD(1.372+04)
KD{9.552-04)
KD(1.202-04)
178.23
26.770
1.372+04
9. 58E-04
1.212-04
M1C-W5-7C
136.13
KD (13.580)
XD(6.692+03)
XD(4.102-04)
HD(5.172-05)
196.13
KD (16.310)
ND(8.272+03)
KD(4.922-04)
XD(6.2Q2-05)
198.13
XD (1.520)
ND(7.712+02)
MD(4.592-05)
MD(5.782-06)
249.11
m (3.720)
¦>(1.892+03)
XD(1.122-04)
KD(1.422-03)
264.78
XD (4.140)
XD(2.108+03)
XD(1.252-04)
XD(1.572-05)
266.34
XD (19.040)
XD(9.662+03)
tt>(5.752-04)
XD(7.242-05)
178.23
» (0.500)
®(2.542+02)
ND(l.SlE-OS)
KD(1.902-06)
C-I4
-------
FIELD
MID RESULTS TABULATION
88KTVOLATXL8
Cootlauad
AAthTAC«M
Forwila Valght, Lb/Li>-Mola
Catch Waight, Hlcxograaa
Coooaotxation, og/DdCN *
Balaaloa Rata, Pouada/Houx
Baiaalos Rata, Qraaa/flaooad
Di-n-butylphthalata
Forml* Waight, Lb/Lb-Jtola
Catch Waisht, HicTograaa
Concentration, ag/DSCM *
Saiaaloo Rata, Pouoda/Bour
Salaaioa Rata* Oraaa/S«cond
Fluoraatha&a
Fomli Waight, Lb/Lb-Mola
Catch Waight, Hicrograsa
Coooaatratlaa, og/DSCM *
Kaiaaion Rata, Pouoda/Bour
Baiaaloo Rata, Craaa/SacoDd
ffyraoa
Fcroula w%i^t, LJ3/U>-Hola
Catch Wd^bt, Mlcrograma
Coocastration, 09/D8CK *
Kaiaaloa Rata, Poosda/Hour
Eaiaaloo Rata, Craaa/Sacond
Butylbaorylphthalata
Poraula Waigbt, Lb/Lb~Mol«
Catch Waig&t, Microgxaaa
Conoantratioo, ngSDSCM ¦
Baiailoo Rata, Pounda/Bour
Zmlaaion Rata, Craaa/flaoond
3,3' -Dlchloroba cuid laa
Foraula Waight, Lb/Lb-M©l#
Catch Waight, Mlcrograa*
Coooaotratiac, og/DSCX *
Ksiaaioa Rata, Pouoda/Bour
Salaaioa Rata, Qraaa/8aooBd
Banco (a) aathracaoa
Foraula waight, Lb/Lb-Kola
Catch Walght, Mlcrograaa
Coaoaotratioa, og/DSCM •
Salaaioa Rata, Pounda/Boar
Enlaaiea Rata, Oraaa/Sacood
WT-MK5-7A
178.23
HD (0.670)
MD(2.328*02)
KD(2.128-05)
HD(2.678-06)
27a.35
ND (1.130)
TO(3.918*02)
KD(3.588-05)
KD(4.518-06)
202.26
KD [14.290]
MD(4.94B*03J
MD[4.538-04]
WE 15.708-05]
202.26
MD (0.230)
HD(7.958*01)
KD(7.298-06)
XD(9.188-07)
312.39
KD (0.620)
KD(2.638*02)
MD(2.608-05)
ND(3.278-06)
253.13
ND (3.790)
MD(1.318*03)
HD(1.208-04)
ND(1.518-05)
228.30
ND (0.300)
KD(1.048*02)
ND(9.508-06)
ND(1.208-06)
KID-m5-7A
176.23
rn (0.620)
KD(3.108*02)
ND( 1.918-05)
KD(2.41X-06)
276. 35
KD (1.0S0)
KD(5.258*02)
MD(3.23B-05]
ND(4.068-06)
202.26
26.620
1.338+C4
t. 208-04
1.038-04
202.26
MD (14.050]
HD(7.028*03]
KD(4.338-04)
MD(5.458-05)
312.39
ND (1.210)
MD(6.Q5B*02)
ND(3.738-05)
ND(4.70B-06)
253.13
KD (5.580)
KD(2.79S«03)
ND(1.728-04)
ND{2.178-05)
228.30
MD [4.410]
ND(2.208*03]
ND (1.358-04]
KD (1.718-05 J
OVT-MH5-7C
176.23
JO (0.730)
W>(3.748*02)
MD(2.618-05)
MD(3.298-06)
276.35
ND (10.200)
KE(5.238*03]
MD(3.658-04]
KD(4.60B-05]
202.26
KD {4.350]
MD[2.238*03]
MD(1.568-04]
*D(1.968-03j
202.26
XD (0.260)
BD( 1.448*02)
MD(l.008-05)
KD(1.268-06)
312.39
MD (1.000)
TO(5.138*02)
ND(3.588-05)
MD(4.518-06)
253.13
ND (4.640)
ND(2.388*03)
ND( 1.668-04)
HD(2.098-05)
228.30
KD (0.360)
MD(1.85B*02)
ND(1.298-05)
MD(1.628-06)
HID-MK5-7C
178.23
KD (0.520)
ND(2.648*02)
KD(1.578-05)
KD(1.988-06)
278.35
KD (0.870)
KD<4.418*02)
ND(2.638-05)
ND(3.318-06)
202.26
ND (0.340)
*D(1.728*02)
KD(1.038-05)
HD(1.298-06)
202.26
XD (0.160)
MD(8.118*01)
KD(4.838-06)
MD(6.098-07)
312.39
MD (0.560)
KD(2.648*02)
KD(1.698-05)
ND(2.138-06)
253.13
ND (2.610)
KD(1.32B*03)
ND(7.888-05)
MD(9.938-06)
228.30
H> (0.200)
ND(1.018*02)
®(6.048-06)
KD(7.618-07)
C-15
-------
FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
SEMIVOLATCLE
Continued
Chrysane
FonaiLa Weight/ Lb/Lh-Mole
Catch Weight, Micrograms
Concentration, ng/DSCM *
Kali#ion Rata/ Pounds/Hour
Emission Rat*/ Grams/Second
bis(2-2tbylhexyl)pbthalate
Formula Weight, Lb/Lb-Kola
Catch weight/ Micrograms
Concentration, ng/DSCM *
Emission Rate, Pounds/Sour
Emission Rate/ Grams/Second
Dl-n-octylphthalate
Formula Weight, Lb/Lb-Hole
Catch Weight/ Micrograms
Concentration, ag/DSQ< ¦
Emission Rate, Pounds/Hour
SalMloa Rate, Crasts/Second
Bento(b)flnoranthene
Formula Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight/ Micrograms
Concentration/ ng/DSCM *
Emission Rata/ Pounds/Hour
Emission Rate, Crams/Second
Benxo(k) fluoranthane
Formula Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight, Micrograms
Concentration, ng/DSOt •
Emission Rata, Founds/Bour
Emission Rate, Grams/Seooad
Banzo(a)pyrece
Formula Weight/ Lb/Lb-Mola
Catch Weight/ Micrograms
Concentration/ og/DSCM •
Sad salon Rate/ Pounds/Bour
Emission Rate/ Crams /Second
Indeno(1/2,3-c*J)pyrsoe
Formula Weight/ Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight/ Micrograms
Concentration, ng/DSCM *
Emission Rata, Pounds/Bour
Emission Rate, Grau&s/8econd
OUT-KH5-7A
226.29
ND (0.310)
ND(1.07E+02)
ND(9.822-06)
ND(1.24B-06)
390.56
84.370
2.92E+04
2.67B-03
3.372-04
390.62
ND (4.910]
ND(1.708+03}
ND[1.562-04]
XD(1.961-05]
252.32
KD (0.580)
ND(2.011+02)
KD(1.848-05)
ND(2.322-06)
252.32
NO (0.500)
NX>(1.73E+02)
ND(1.58E-05)
ND(2.00E-06)
252.32
HD (0.730)
ND(2.52B+02)
ND(2.312-05)
ND<2.912-06)
2W.35
HD (1.560)
ND(5.39E+02)
HD(4.942-05)
ND(6.23E-06)
MID-H45-7A
228.29
ND (0.460)
ND(2.30E+O2)
ND(1.42E-05)
KD (1.792-06)
390.56
52.210
2.612+04
1.612-03
2.032-04
390.62
ND (0.910)
ND(4.552+02)
ND(2.802-05)
ND(3.531-06)
252.32
ND (1.290)
ND(6.45B+02)
ND(3.97E-05)
ND(5 .012-06)
2S2.32
ND (1.120)
ND(5.6C2+02)
RD(3.452-05)
ND(4.35E-06)
252.32
ND (1.630)
ND(d.152+02)
ND(5.02E-05)
ND(6.33E-06)
288.35
ND (3.470)
ND(1.732+03)
ND(1.072-04)
ND(l.352-05)
OUT-MH5-7C
228.29
ND (0.380)
ND( 1.952+02)
ND( 1.362-05)
ND(1.712-06)
390.56
ND [10.260)
ND(5.262*03)
ND[3.672-04]
MD{4.632-05]
390.62
ND (0.380)
ND(1.952+02)
ND(1.362-05)
ND( 1.712-06)
252.32
ND (0.550)
MD( 2.822+02)
ND( 1.972-05)
ND(2.48E-06)
252.32
ND (0.470)
HD(2.412+02)
SD(1.682-05)
ND( 2.122-06)
252.32
ND (0.690)
ND(3.54E+02)
ND( 2.472-05)
ND(3.112-06)
296*35
ND (1.470]
ND(7.542+02)
ND(5.262-05)
ND(6.632-06)
MID-W5-7C
228.29
ND (0.210)
ND(1.062+02)
ND(6.342-06)
ND(7.992-07)
390.56
141.160
7.162*04
4.262-03
5.372-04
390.62
ND (1396.850)
ND(7.082+05]
HD(4.222-02)
HD( 5.312-03)
252.32
ND (1657.480)
ND(8.412+05)
ND(5.002-02)
HD (6.302-03)
252.32
ND (809.160)
KD(4.102+05)
KD (2.442-02)
NE(3.082-03)
252.32
ND (955.720)
ND(4.852+05]
ND(2.092-02)
ND(3.642-03)
288.35
ND (2346.940)
ND(1.192+06)
ND(7.092-02)
ND(8.932-03)
C-16
-------
FIELD DAI* AJB RESULTS TABULATXO*
SEKIVOLATILZ
Continued
OUI-HH5-7X
K1D-W5-7A
OOT-«t5-7C
MI!>-l*l5-7C
Dlb«n*(«,h)as thra cane
Formula Weight, Lb/Lb-Molt
Catch Weight, Miarograaa
Concentration, ng/DSCK •
Balasion Rate, Pound*/Bour
Ealstloa Rata, Ccasa/Second
Beaso(g,b,1 )parylan«
Foraula Weight, Lb/Lb-Mola
Catch Weight, Micrograaa
Concent ration, og/DSCM *
Emission Rata, Founda/Bour
EmlasioQ Rata, Oraae/Second
278.35
to (1.270)
KD(4.392*02)
ND( 4.02S-0S)
HD( 5.07E-06)
276.34
NO (1.130)
ND(3.912*02)
HD(3.582-05}
HD(4.511-06)
276.35
HD (2.830)
KD(1.412*03)
ND(8.722-05)
ND(1.102-05)
276.34
KD (2.510)
ND(1.25E*03)
HD(7.732-05)
MD (9.742-46)
278.35
KD (1.200)
!fD(6.152*02)
KD< 4.29E-0S)
WD(5.412-06)
276.34
HD (1.060)
HD(5.442*02)
HD{3.792-05)
HD{4.762-06)
278.35
KD (2150.640)
ND(1.098*06)
KD(6.492-02)
ND(8.182-03)
276.34
HD (1266.660)
MD(6.422*05)
XD (3. 822-02)
MD(4.822-03)
C-17
-------
FIELD £*XX AKD RESULTS tWULATIO*
Coatiaoad
Plant: 631, 61 xm 9
Saapliag Location J Multlpla BurU) Incinerator Stack
Operator: Rlchaxd L. Morano
7A-0-V-1
7B-0-V-1
7C-0-V-1
Data
Start Tiaa
Finiab Tine
Hat Saapliag Time, Miaotee
Dry Caa Motor Coafficiaat
Baroaetxic Praeaure, In. Bg.
Metar Toaperature, Dog. F
volaae Ha tared, DSCP •
Flu* Qa« Flow Rata, Dry 8CFM
5/30/90
2015
2035
20
0.9970
29.20
69
C.687
19S00
5/30/90
2036
20S6
20
1.0114
29.20
68
0.681
19S00
5/30/90
2117
2137
20
0.9970
29.20
65
0.694
19500
Acrylonltrl!•
Forwala Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight, Kicrograaa
concentration, ng/DSCH *
Saiaaioa Rata, ?ouaUa,*Botir
Eaiaaioa Rata, Qraaa/Saooad
vinyl chloride
Form la Weight, Lb/Lb-Kola
Catch Weight, Xlcrogxaaa
Coacentratioa, ag/DSQ4 *
Eaiaaioa Rata, Pouada/Bour
Eaiaaioa Rata, Grast/Saooad
Methylene Chlorlda
Formla Weight, Lb/Lto-Mola
Catch Weight, Kicrograaa
Concentration, og/DSCM *
Exitsion Rata, Pouada/Bcur
Eaiaaion Rata, Craaa/Secoad
Chloroform
Foraula Weight, ib/Lb-Moie
Catch Weight, Kicrograaa
Concentration, ng/DSCM *
Eaiaaioa Rata, Pocada/Bour
Saiaeioa Rata, Craaa/Second
1,2-0lchloroethaae
Foraula Weight, Ib/Lb-Kole
Catch Weight, Kicrograaa
Concentration, og/DSCM •
loiaeloa Rata, Pouoda/Bour
Eaiaaioa Rata, Oraaa/Seooad
53.06
41.166
2.112*06
1.548-01
1.951-02
62.50
HD (0.005)
HD(2.571*02)
MD(1.881-05)
KD(2.36E-06)
84.94
2.054
1.061*05
7.7U-C3
9.711-04
119.38
0.592
3.04£*04
2.22B-03
2.801-04
98.96
HD (0.003)
ND(1.54B«02)
ND(1.138-05)
ND(1.421-06)
53.06
12.841
6.66E»05
4.«o*-02
6.131-03
62.50
KD (0.005)
KD(2.598*02)
KD(1.891-05)
MD( 2.39S-06)
84.94
1.982
1.03E*05
7.511-03
9.46E-04
119.33
KD (0.002)
KD
-------
FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Continued
7A-0-V-1
7B-0-V-1
7C-0-V-1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Foraula Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight, Micrograms
Concentration, ng/DSCM *
Emission Rate, Pounds/Sour
Emission Bate, Cranio/Second
Carbon Tetrachloride
Formula Weight, Lb/Lb-Hole
Catch Weight, Micrograms
Concentration, ag/D3CM *
Emission Bate, Pound*/aour
Emission Bate, Grams/Second
Trichloroetbena
Foroula Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight, Micrograms
Concentration, ng/DSQ* •
Emission Sate, Pounds/Hour
Emission Rate, Grams/Second
Benzene
Form]la Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight, Micrograms
Coocentratlon, ng/DSCM *
Emission Rate, Pounds/Hour
Emission Rata, Gr&ns/Socond
Tetrachloroetheoa
Fomla Weight, Lb/Lb-+tole
Catch Weight, Microgram*
Concentration, ng/DSCM *
Emission Rate, Pounds/Hour
Emission Rate, Grass/Second
Toluene
Foraula Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight, Micrograms
Concentration, ng/DSCM *
Emission Rata, Pounds/Hour
Emission Rata, Grams/Second
Chlorotoea reae
Formula Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight, Micrograms
Concentration, ng/DSCM *
Emission Rata, Pounds/Hour
Emission Rata, Grams/Second
133.41
KD (0.002)
IfD( 1.032*02)
KD(7.512-06)
ND{ 9.*68-07)
153.82
«> (0.002)
HD(1.032*02)
*0(7.512-06)
KD(9.462-07)
131.40
KD (0.002)
ND(1.032*02)
ND(7.512-06)
KD(9.468-07)
78.12
401.912
2.0624-07
1.512*00
1.902-01
163.85
NO [0.032]
FD[1.642*03]
ND( 1.202-04]
HD[1.512-05]
92.13
108.201
5.562*06
4.062-01
5.12E-02
112.56
HD [0.023]
HD[1.182*03]
KD[8.632-05]
HD[1.092-05]
133.41
0.624
3.242*04
2.362-03
2.96B-C4
153.82
KD (0.003)
HD(1.56B*02)
J(D(1.142-05)
BD(1.432-06}
131.40
0.592
3.07E*04
2.242-03
2.832-04
78.12
68.153
3.532*06
2.588-01
3.252-02
163.85
0.591
3.062*04
2.242-03
2.822-04
92.13
61.346
3.182*06
2.322-01
2.932-02
112.56
0.424
2.202*04
1.613-03
2.022-04
133.41
0.740
3.772*04
2.752-03
3.47B-04
153.82
KD (0.003)
HD(1.532*02)
HD( 1.122-05)
HD<1.412-06)
131.40
0.720
3.662*04
2.682-03
3.372-04
78.12
137.402
6.992*06
5.112-01
6.442-02
163.85
0.635
3.232*04
2.36S-03
2.972-04
92.13
178.215
9.072+u©
6.632-01
8.352-02
112.56
1.605
8.172*04
5.972-03
7.522-04
C-19
-------
FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Continued
7A-0-V-1
7B-0-V-1
7C-0-V-1
Bthylbenxene
Formula Weight, Lb/Lb-Hole
Catch Weight, Kicrograaa
Coocentration, ng/DSOt *
Emission Rata, Pound*/Hour
Emission Rate, Graa»/Second
106.16
0.070
3.608*03
2.63B-04
3.3 IE-05
106.16
0.780
4.048+04
2.95B-03
3.7ZB-04
106.16
7.234
3.688*05
2.69B-02
3.398-03
C-20
-------
FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Continued
PIAnt: 821, Site 9
Sampling Locations Multiple Hearth Incinerator Stack
Operator: Richard L. Moreno
Date
Start Tiae
Pin lab Tia*
Ket sampling Tims, Minutes
Dry Gas Mater Coefficient
Barcoetrlc Pressor*, Id. Hg.
Meter Teoperatxire, Deg. ?
volume Metered, DSCF *
Flue Gaa Flow Rate, Dry SCFK
7A-0-V-2
5/31/90
1645
1705
20
1.0114
29.70
77
0.699
18800
7B-0-V-2
5/31/90
1705
1725
20
0.9970
29.70
78
0.671
18800
7C-0-V-2
5/31/90
1725
1745
20
1.0114
29.70
82
0.690
18800
Acrylonltrile
Formula Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight, Micrograms
Concent-ration, ng/DSCM *
Emission Rata, r-onds/Hour
Emission Rata, Grans/Second
vinyl chloride
Formula Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight, Micrograms
Concentration, og/03CM *
Emission Kate, Pounds/Hour
Emission Rate, Grama/Second
Methylene chloride
Fommla Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catcfe Weight, Micrograms
Concentration, og/D£CM '
Emission Rate, Pounds/Hour
Emission Rate, Grams/Second
Chloroform
Foraula Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight/ Micrograms
Cocoeatratioc, ng/DSCM *
Emission Rate, Pounds/Hour
Emission Rate, Grama/8ecoQd
1,2-Dichloroethane
Formula Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight, Micrograms
Concentration, ng/DSCM *
Emission Rate, Pounds/Hour
Emission Rate, Grass/Second
53.06
23.604
1.205*06
8.475-02
1. Q7B-02
62.50
4.282
2.165*05
1.522-02
1.92E-03
84.94
0.303
1.535*04
1.0*8-03
1.3S5-04
119.38
0.594
3.005*04
2.11*-03
2.66B-04
98.96
KD (0.002)
ND(1.015*02)
ND(7.122-06)
ND(8.975-07)
53.06
18.357
9.665*05
6.805-02
8.57B-03
62.50
ND (0.004)
ND(2.105*02)
ND(1.465-05)
ND(1.875-06)
84.94
0.149
7.845*03
5.525-04
6.965-05
119.38
0.475
2.505*04
1.762-03
2.225-04
98.96
KD (0.002)
ND(1.055*02)
KD (7 .415-06)
HD(9.345-07)
53.06
22.722
1.165*06
8.195-02
1.035-02
62.50
4.150
2.135*05
1.505-02
1.895-03
84.94
0.491
2.515*04
1.775-03
2.235-04
119.36
0.323
1.655*04
1.165-03
1.475-04
98.96
ND (0.002)
HD(1.025*02)
HD(7.215-06)
ND(9.095-07)
C-21
-------
FIELD DATA AKD RESULTS TABULATION
Continued
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Por*uia Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight, Microgram*
Concentration, ng/D3CJ4 *
£mission Rate, Pound*/Hour
Emission Rate, Grama/Socond
Carbon Tetrachloride
Pornula Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight, Micrograms
Concentration, ng/CSCM *
Emission Rate, Pound*/Hour
Emission Rate, Grams/Seoood
Trlchloroetbene
Foraula Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight, Micrograms
Coocentratioo, ng/DSCM *
Emission Rate, Pound*/Hour
Emission Rate, Crams/Second
Benzene
Fonaula Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight, Micrograms
Concentration, ng/DSCM *
Emission Rate, Pound*/Hour
Emission Rate, Grana/Second
Tetrachloroethene
Pormula Weight, Lb/Lb-Hole
Catch Weight, Microgram*
Concentration, ng/DSQt *
Ealaalon Rate, Pounds/Hour
Emission Rata, Grass/Second
Toluene
Fonaula Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight, Microgram
Concentration, ng/DSCM *
Emission Rate, Pound*/Hour
Emission Rate, Grass/Second
Chlorobenzene
Formula Weight, Lb/Lb-Kole
Catch Weight, Micrograms
Concentration, ng/DSCM *
Emission Rate, Pounds/Hour
Emission Rate, Gran*/Second
7A-0-V-2
133.41
0.524
2.658+04
1.865-03
2.355-04
153.82
HD (0.002)
ND(1.015+02)
HD(7.125-06)
TO(8.975-07)
131.40
0.603
3.055+04
2.155-03
2.705-04
78.12
93.053
4.705+06
3.315-01
4.175-02
163.85
0.740
3.745+04
2.635-03
3.325-04
92.13
76.782
3.88E+06
2.735-01
3.445-02
112.56
0.826
4.175+04
2.945-03
3.70S-04
7B-0-V-2
133.41
0.418
2.205+04
1.555-03
1.95E-04
153.82
HD (0.002)
ND(1.055+02)
ND(7.415-06)
MD(9.345-07)
131.40
0.576
3.035+04
2.135-03
2.695-04
76.12
95.659
5.035+06
3.555-01
4.475-02
163.85
0.749
3.94E+04
2.785-03
3.505-04
92.13
97.151
5.115+06
3.605-01
4.545-02
112.56
2.775
1.46E+05
1.035-02
1.305-03
7C-0-V-2
133.41
0.352
1.805+04
1.275-03
1.605-04
153.82
ND (0.002)
KD(1.025+02)
HD(7.215-06)
KD{9.095-07)
131.40
0.422
2.165+04
1.525-03
1.925-04
78.12
108.263
5.545+06
3.902-01
4.925-02
163.85
0.481
2.465+04
1.735-03
2.195-04
92.13
42.503
2.18E+06
1.535-01
1.935-02
112.56
1.009
5.175+04
3.645-03
4.585-04
C-22
-------
FIELD DMA AMD RESULTS TABULATION
Continued
7A-C-V-2
7B-0-V-2
7C-0-V-2
Stftylbenxto*
FormilA V«igbt, Lb/Lb-Mol«
Catch Valgbc, Klcrograas
Concentration, eg/DSOt *
EaImIoq RiU/ Pound*/Bour
Eelloo Rat*/ Cr«ss/S*oond
106.16
0.977
4.941*04
J. 4 as-03
4.332-04
106.16
3.930
2.072*0$
1.46B-02
l.MB-03
106.16
1.237
6.33S»04
4.468-03
S.625-04
C-23
-------
FIELD CAm AXD RESULTS TABULATIOB
Coatlauad
FlaatJ 831, 8ita 9
Saapllag Locatlooi Kultipla Baartb Incinerator Stack
Oparatort Richard I. Horano
Date
Star* 71m
Finish Tin
Nat Saapllng Tin, Kinutaa
Dry Gu Kater coefficient
Barooatrlc Fraaaura, 2d. Bg.
Motor Taaperatura, Dag. F
Voluaa Metered, DSCF *
Flue Gas Flaw Rate, Dry 8CFM
7A-0-V-3
5/31/90
1743
1805
20
1.01U
29.70
84
0.6B0
18800
TB-O-V-3
5/31/90
1805
1825
20
0.9970
29.70
84
0.686
18800
7C-0-V-3
5/31/90
1625
1845
20
1.0114
29.70
84
0.682
18800
Acrylooitrlle
Formula Weight, Lb/Lb-Hole
Catch Weight, Kicrograoa
Coocentratioo, ng/DSCM •
Salaalon Rata, Pound*/Hour
Bnlaslon Rata, Graas/SacoDd
Vinyl ChiorIda
Foraula Vaigtit, Lb/Lb-Kola
Catch Weight, Kicrograaa
Concentration, og/Dsot "
fimiaaioa Rata, Foodda/Hour
Saisaloa Rata, Craaa/Second
Methylene Chloride
Form la Waight, Lb/Lh-Mola
Catch Valght, Kicrograaa
Concentration, ng/DSCM •
Baiaalon Rata, Founda/Hour
Knissioa Rata, Craaa/Sacood
Chlorofora
Forsiila Weight, Lb/Lb-Kola
Catch Valght, Klcrograaa
Concentration, ng/DSCM •
Eaisalon Rata, Pouada/Boux
Eaisalon Rata, Craaa/Seooad
2,2-Dichloroethane
Formila Valght, Lb/Lb-Hole
Catch valght, Klcrograaa
Concentration, og/DSQt •
Kalaaloa Rata, Found*/Bour
Salatloo Rata, Craaa/Sacood
53.06
12.599
6.548*05
4.618-02
5.8IB>03
62.50
1TD (0.003)
JTD(1.568+02)
!Q(1.108-05)
5D(1.381-06)
84.94
0.249
1.292*04
9.21Z-04
1.151-04
119.38
0.(20
2.18X+44
1.S4S-03
1.941-04
98.96
RD (0.002)
XD(1.048*02)
HD(7.328-06)
80(9.228-07)
53.06
10.91S
5.628*05
3.96B-02
4.998-03
62.50
3.246
1.678*05
1.188-02
1.481-03
84.94
0.285
1.478*04
1.038-03
1.308-04
119.38
0.503
2.598*04
1.82*-03
2.308-04
98.96
HD (0.002)
HD(1.038*02)
XD(7.252-06)
HD(9.148-07)
53.06
15.32S
7.948*05
5.591-02
7.048-03
62.50
KD (0.004)
TO(2.078*02)
KD( 1.468-05)
KD{1.848-06)
84.94
0.320
1.668*04
1.178-03
1.478-04
119.38
0.493
2.558*04
1.808-03
2.278-04
98.96
ND (0.002)
KD(1.048*02)
HD(7.298-06)
ND(9.198-07)
C-24
-------
FIELD DATA AKD RESULTS TABULATION
Continued
1,1,1-Trlchloroethane
Poraula Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight, Klorograas
Concentration, ng/ESCX *
Emission Rate, Pounda/eour
Salssloa Rate, Creaa/Second
Catboa Tetrachloride
Foraula Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch weight, Klcrogrea*
Concentration, Dg/D3CK *
EiLisslon Rata, Pounds/Hocr
Kalasloa Rate, £raaa/8ecood
Trichloroethane
Foraula Weight, Lb/Lb-*ole
Catch Weight, Klcrogriae
Concentration, ng/DSOi •
Eaisalon Kate, Pounda/Bour
Eaisalon Rate/ fir saa/Second
Bansane
Poraul* Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catctk Weight, Micrograms
Cooce«txet.lo«, ng/DSO« *
Eaisalon JUte, Pounds/Hour
Eaiasioa Rata, Graas/Seoond
Tetrachloroetheae
Porsula Weight, Lb/Lb-Hola
Catch Weight, Hicrograa#
Cooceotratioo, og/DSCM *
Salsalon Rate, Founds/Hour
Ealaslon Rata, Craaa/Secood
Tolusne
Foraula Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight/ Hlcrogrsae
Concentration, og/DSCM *
Kalsslon Rate, Pounds/Boor
Emission Rate, Craas/Secood
Chlorobeozene
Formula Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole
Catch Weight, Klcrograae
Concentration, ng/DSCK *
Salssloa Rate, Pounds/Boor
Balssion Rate, Crass/Second
7A-0-V-3
7B-Q-V-3
7C-0-V-3
133.41
KD (0.002)
*C(1.048*02)
Nb(7.32B-06)
ND(9.228-07)
133.41
KD (0.002)
MD(1.038*02)
)©(7.25Z-06)
HD<9.148-07)
133.41
0.401
2.088+04
1.46B-03
1.848-04
153.82
SD (0.002)
ND(1.041*02)
ND(7.328-06)
HD( 9.228-07)
131.40
0.336
1.758*04
1.232-03
1.558-04
153.82
KD (0.002)
HD(1.038*02)
ND(7.258-06)
1ID(9.148-07)
131.40
0.513
2.$48*04
1.868-03
2.348-04
153.82
ND (0.003)
ND(1.S5B*02)
ND(1.098*05)
NS(1.388-06)
131.40
0.536
2.78S*04
1.95E-03
2.46E-04
78.12
105.261
5.47X*06
3.8SB-01
4.858-02
78.12
45.380
2.348*06
1.658-01
2.07B-02
78.12
61.855
3.208*06
2.268-01
2.848-02
163.85
0.464
2.418*04
1.708*03
2.148-04
163.85
0.675
3.488*04
2.458-03
3.08E-04
163.65
0.721
3.738*04
2.638-03
3.318-04
92.13
20.349
1.06E+06
7.44S-02
9.388-03
92.13
55.218
2.64£*06
2.00S-01
2.528-02
92.13
74.745
3.87E*06
2.738-01
3.438-02
112.56
0.694
4.64E«04
3.278-03
4.128-04
112.56
0.760
3.918*04
2.768-03
3.478-04
112.56
1.368
7.088*04
4.998-03
6.298-04
I C-25
-------
FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Continued
ttbylbaaxaas
Forsul* Vaight. Lb/Lfc-Mol*
C«tch V«lgbt, Miorogr«a«
Concentration, ng/DSCM *
KBiMloo Rtzs, Pound*/Bour
Smis»loc R«t«, Gr«a*/5«cood
C-26
7A-0-V-3
106.16
0.586
3.048+04
2.14S-03
2.7QB-04
TB-O-V-3
106.16
0.903
4.6SS+04
3.278-03
4.1J8-04
7C-0-V-3
106.16
1. 921
9.43S«0«
6.64S-03
8.17X-04
-------
FIELD DAIX. AMD RESULTS TABULATION
tJMTtl MI
SAMPLING LOCATICWJ 8it« 9
Teat Data
Sasple Start TJjm
Sanpla Finish Tiaa
Tbata Set Sanple Tiaa, Minuta«
Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Pbar laroMtxlo Praitun, Inch— 89
Vu Volnaa of Matured Oaa Saaple, Lltara
tm Dry oaa xatar Tanparatura, Dagreaa 7
Dalta-H Avg. Pree«uxa Differential of
Meter, Ioohaa B20
7A-0-V-3 71-0-V-3 7C-0-V-3
5/31/90 5/31/90 5/31/90
1745
1805
20
1.0114
29.7
19.705
84
1805
1825
20
0.9970
29.7
20.155
84
1825
1645
20
1.0114
29.7
19.762
1.30
vast* voluse ot Matarad 0«s Saaple, 81:
19.260
19.420
19.310
C-27
-------
PLANT: ftfll
SAMPLING LOCATICWl Sit# 9
FTTTJ) DATA AMD RESULTS TABULATION
TMt Dat«
Saopla Start Tiaa
Saaplo Finish Ti®o
Thota Sot Saspl# Tiaa, HlnaCM
Y Dry C&a Motor Calibration Factor
Pbax Barcootrlc Pro»«ur«, incba# Bg
Vs Voluao of Motorod Gas Saaplo, Litort
tm Dry Gas Motor Teaporaturo, Degrees F
Delta-H Avy. Pressure Differential of
Mator, Inches R?0
7A-0-V-1 7B-0-V-1 7C-0-V-1
5/30/90 5/30/90 5/30/90
2015
2035
20
0.9970
29.2
19.972
69
1.60
2036
2056
20
1.0114
29.2
19.481
66
1.30
2117
2137
20
0.9970
29.2
20.010
65
1.55
Vaotd Voluao of Kotared Gas Saaplo, SL*
19.470 19.280
19.650
C-28
-------
FIELD DATA AMD RESULTS TASULATIQK
PLAHT: SSI
SAMPLIHO LOCATIONI 6if 9
Teat Date
Sample Start Tiae
Sample Finish Tina
Theta Met Sample Tine, Klnutae
Y Dry Caa Metar Calibration Factor
Pbar Barometric Preesuxe, Iccfaee Hg
Va Volume of Matarod Gaa Saaple, Litara
ta Dry Caa Hater Teoperature, Degreea T
Delta-B Avg. Preaaure Differential of
Hater, Iachaa B20
7A-0-V-2 7B-0-V-2 7C-0-V-2
5/31/90 5/31/90 5/31/90
1645
1705
20
1.0114
29.7
19.983
77
1.50
1705
1725
20
0.9970
29.7
19.510
78
1.30
1725
1745
20
1.0114
29.7
19.901
82
1.50
Vnstd Voluae of Metered Caa Sample, 8L*
19,790
19.000
19.S30
C-29
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Sit«9 Bttl Kin Mo.: IN-MMTL-2B
Date: 5/30/90
Saepling Location: inlet
Operator:
l.t.
Met Run Tiae: 120 «in Run
Start Tlat: 12:31
ISOKINETIC DATA
Rub Saapllng Points: 9 Sun
Stop Tiae: 2:31
Nozzle Nunber: 0
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.: 0.840
Pbsr Seroaetric Pressure, in Hg:
29^100
Oia
Nozzle Oiaaeter, in: 0.375
Pg Flue Cm Static Press, in H20:
•o.soo
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2: 14400.0
P« Absolute Flu* Gas Press, in Kg:
29.063
vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec: 28.9
Osd
Volioetrie Air Flow Rate, Ory SCFH: 54863.5
Moisture Data:
Oew
Volumetric Afr Flow Rate, Wet ACFM: 173524.5
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, al:
258.1
XI
Isokinetic Sealing Rate, X: 98.1
Vw(std) Voluae of Water Vapor, SCf:
12.149
XK20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
19.69
Va(Dry) Volune Gas Metered, Dry: 48.651
XC02 Percent C02 by vol me, Ory:
6.50
Va(Std) Volune Cat Metered, Std: 49.555
X02 Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
12.SO
Mfd Ory Mole Fraction:
0.803
Fo Orsat Validetlon Value: 1.29 EMISSIONS RESULTS
Md Estfaeted Ory Mot. tft, Lb/Lb-Hole: 30.00
MS
Uet Hoi. bt
, Lb/Lb-Mole:
27.64
U9
chrome 100.000ug
aQ/dsca
Concentration, ag/dsca: 71.263x
10-3
FIELD DATA
gr/dscf
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.031x
10-3
Meter Box Nuter:
rac'5
Meter lox dHa
1.869
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 14.642*
10*3
Ory Gat Meter Cal.
Y: 1.061
AtsuMd Moisture:
7.00
Kfl/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 6.642x
10-3
iMk Teet Rate, CFM: 0.010
Leak Test Vac
, in Mg:
10.00
og
nickel 100.000ug
taple
Ory Oaa
ag/dsca
Concentration, ag/dsca: 71.263x
10-3
Point
Tfae
Meter Reeding
Delta P
Delta N
Cm Meter
Stack
gr/dscf
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.031x
10-3
Nui
(¦In)
(cv ft)
fin H20)
(in H20)
Two (of)
T«*> (OF)
Lb/hr
Emission *ate,Lb/hr PMRc: 14.6t2x
10-3
1
0:00
269.397
0.100
0.500
0.0
885.0
Kg/hr
Eaission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 6.642x
10-3
2
0:15
275.428
0.100
O.SOO
0.0
0.0
3
0:30
262.154
0.100
0.500
90.0
1148.0
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABPIATION
Plant: sit«9
Sampling Locations inlet
Net Rw Tim: 120 sin
Nlm Saapl ing Points: 9
Rv>Mo.: IN-NI-2C Date: 5/30/90
Operator: l.t.
Km Start Tiae: 12:32
Rixi Stop Tiae: 2:32
Pressures:
Pbar
Baronatric Ppasture, in Hg:
29.100
Pfl
Flue Gas Static Press, in «20:
-0.500
Pa
Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
29.063
Moisture Date:
Vic
Vol. Liquid Collected, al:
262.9
Vw(std) Voluaa of Water Vapor, SCF:
12.375
XH20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
20.30
XC02
Percent C02 by Voluaa, Dry:
6.SO
X02
Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
12.50
Nfd
Dry Mola Fraction:
0.797
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.29
Hd
Estiaated Dry Mol. Wt, Lb/Lb-Mole:
30.00
Ma
Vet Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
27.S6
Meter fcw n
Tano tal
100.000ug
Concentration, ag/dsca:
Concentration, gr/dsca:
Eaission Rate,Lb/fcr PNtc:
Eaission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc:
72.666k 10-3
0.032* 10-3
15.459* 10-3
7.012* 10-3
C-31
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: ait«9
Sailing Location: inlet
Net Run Tiae: 120 ain
Nua Stoplino Points: 9
RuiWo.: IN-NI-2D ftate: 5/30/90
Operator: l.t.
Run Start Tin*: 12:33
Run Stop Tine: 2:33
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle Nuiber:
0
Pressures:
CP
Pltot Titoe Coef.:
0.840
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Kg:
29.100
Die
Nozzle Diaaeter, in:
0.375
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
•0.500
A
Stack/Ouct Area, (n2:
14400.0
Ps Absolute Flue Cas Press, in Kg:
29.063
Vs
Flue Cas Velocity, Ft/sec:
28.1
flsd
volunetrfc Air Flow Rate,
Ory SCFM:
54532.3
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Wet ACFM:
168304.6
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, al:
316.1
XI
Isokinetic Stapling Rate,
X:
93.7
Vtrfstd) Voluae of Water Vapor, SCF:
14.879
XM20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
24.04
V^Ory)
Voluae Cas Metered, Ory;
46.935
XC02 Percent C02 by Voluae, Dry:
6.50
Vm(Std)
voluae Cas Metered, Std:
47.023
X02 Percent 02 by Voluae, Ory:
12.50
Mfd Ory Mole Fraction:
0.760
Fo Orset Validation Value: 1.29
Md Ettiaated Dry Mol. Wt, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms Wet Mol. Wt, Lb/Lb-Mole: 27.12
FIELD DATA
Meter Sox Ihafeer: rac-3
Ory Gas Meter Cal. T: 1.062
Leak Test Rate, CFM: 0.011
Meter Box dHa: 1.849
Assuaed Moisture: 7.00
Leek Test Vac, in Ng: 10.00
EMISSIONS RESULTS
ug chrca* 100.000ug
ag/dsca Concentration, ag/dsca: 7?.101* 10-3
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dacf: 0.033x 10-3
Lb/hr Eaitslon Rate,lb/hr PWRe: 15.334x10-3
Kg/hr Eaission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 6.957* 10-3
ug
nickel lOO.OOOug
Saaple
Dry Cas
¦e/dsaa
Concentration, ag/dsca:
73.101x
10-3
Point
Tiae
Meter Reading
Oelta P
Delta H
Cas Meter
Stack
gr/dscf
Concentration, gr/dscf:
0.033*
10-3
Nt*
(ain)
(cu ft)
fin H20)
(in H20)
Twc (cF>
Tea® (of)
Lb/hr
Eaission R«te,Lta/hr PMKc:
15.338*
10-3
1
0:00
809.439
0.100
0.500
85.0
0.0
Kg/hr
Eaission Rata,Kg/hr PMRc:
6.957x
10-3
2
0.15
810.188
0.100
0.500
0.0
0.0
3
0:30
82U56
0.100
0.500
92.0
1148.0
ug
aetal 100.000ug
4
0:45
827.923
0.100
0.500
91.0
1109.0
ag/dsca
Concentration, ag/dsca:
75.101*
10-3
5
0:60
833.376
0.100
0.500
90.0
965.6
gr/dsca
Concentration, gr/dsca:
0.033*
10-3
6
0:75
839.860
0.100
0.500
96.0
940.0
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc:
15.33Sx
10-3
7
0:90
845.600
0.100
0.500
102.0
921.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc:
6.957x
10-3
8
1:05
8S2.120
0.100
o.soo
104.0
767.0
9
1:20
856.374
0.100
0.500
102.0
831.4
10
120/0FF
856.374
iff
*6.935
0.100
0.500
84.7
742.4
C-3 2
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant; Site9 Bui
no.: OUT-MMTL-2A
Date: 5/30/90
Saaplirtg Location: outlet
Operator:
rla
Net Run Tiae: 120 a1n
Rvn Start Tiae: 12:30
ISOKINETIC DATA
Mm Saddling Points: ft
Rvn Stop Tim: 14:30
Nozzle Murrber: t-7
Pressures:
CP
Pitot Tube Coef.: 0.840
Pber Baroaetric Pressure, In Hg:
28.600
Oia
Nozzle Diaaeter, in: 0.242
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, (n H20:
•0.180
A
Stack/0uct Area, 1n2: 1319.5
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
28.787
VS
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec: 42.2
Qsd
Volumetric Air Floy Rate, Ory SCFM: 19673.6
Moisture Data:
Qaw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Vet ACFM: 23213.4
Vic Vol. liquid Collected, ml:
75.1
XI
isokinetic Sampling Kate, X: 98.1
Vw(std) Voluae of Water Vapor, SCF:
3.535
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
4.20
Va
(in M20>
(in K201
Tewo (oFl
Two (of)
Lb/hr
Eaission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 3.224* 10*3
1
0:00
346.436
0.420
1.490
66.0
115.0
Kg/hr
Eaission Rate.Kg/hr PMRc: 1.463* 10-3
2
0:15
356.420
0.550
1.950
75.0
117.0
3
0:30
367.420
0.490
1.730
85.0
117.0
UQ
aetal lOO.OOOug
4
0:4S
378.260
0.5S0
1.950
93.0
116.0
ag/dsca
Concentration, ac/dsca: 43.762* 10*3
5
0:60
389.560
0.580
2.050
98.0
113.0
gr/dsca
Concentration, gr/dsca: 0.019* 10-3
6
0:75
401.350
0.480
1.700
102.0
117.0
Lb/hr
Eaission Rate.lb/hr PMRc: 3.Z24* 10-3
7
0:90
412.360
0.560
1.980
104.0
115.0
Kfl/hr
Eaission ftate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.463* 10-3
8
1:05
424.080
0.470
1.660
105.0
104.0
9
120/OFF
434.863
10
11
12
--
-
--
--
13
--
••
«•
--
14
--
••
--
-•
~-
15
••
••
-¦
16
--
••
--
••
••
17
••
--
--
••
18
--
••
•-
-•
19
•-
--
--
-•
20
--
••
••
-•
•*
21
--
--
*•
-•
22
..
--
--
-•
• •
23
• •
-
-•
••
24
••
-•
-
-
25
••
•*
••
fI MAI/AVG
120
88.427
0.511
1.814
91.0
114.2
C-33
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: ftlte9 Rin No.
: OUT-MMTL-2B Oate:
5/30/90
Saapling location: outlet
Operator: rla
Net Rir» Tine: 120 ain Riri Start Tiae: 12:31
ISOKINETIC DATA
Hue Stapling Points: 8 Run
Stop riw: 14:31
Nozzle Niaber:
t-8
Pressures:
Cp
Pi tot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Pber SarcaetrJc Pressure, in Hg:
28.800
Oia
Nozzle Oiaaeter, in:
0.243
Pg Flue Cat Static Press. In H20:
•0.180
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps Absolute Flue C«s Press, fn Kg:
28.787
VS
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
41.9
Ocd
Votuaetric Air Flow Rate, Ory SCFM:
19583.5
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Voluaetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM:
23054.2
Vic Vol. liqjid Collected, el:
71.8
XI
Isokinetic Sailing late, X:
98.8
Vw(std) Volute of Water Vapor, SCf;
3.380
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
3.98
Va
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RE8ULTS TABULATION
Plant: 8ite9
Stapling location; outlet
Net Rud Tfae: 120 Bin
Nua Sampling Points: 8
Ru» Ko.: OUT-NI-C-2 Date: 5/50/90
Operator: rla
Rin start Tfae: 12:30
Run Stop Ttae: 18:39
Pressures:
Pber ftaraaetric Pressure, in Hg:
Pg Flue Cm Static Press.
tin H20)
lam tof)
Ten© (cF)
1
0:00
867.500
0.420
1.360
68.0
115.0
2
0:15
877.461
0.550
1.780
74.0
117.0
3
0:30
888.757
0.490
1.S80
84.0
117.0
4
0;45
899.470
0.550
1.780
94.0
116.0
5
1;00
909.995
0.580
1.900
102.0
113.0
6
1:15
922.015
0.480
1.550
105.0
117.0
7
1:30
930.949
0.560
1.810
110.0
115.0
6
1:45
944.716
0.470
1.520
112.0
104.0
9
120/0FF
956.278
10
••
--
--
-•
-
--
11
--
-•
--
-•
--
12
--
--
--
-•
-
-•
13
-
--
-
-
-
••
14
••
-•
--
-•
••
••
IS
••
••
--
--
-•
-
16
••
••
--
-
--
--
17
••
-
--
••
--
-
18
-•
--
-•
--
19
••
--
••
••
20
--
••
--
••
21
-
••
••
••
••
22
••
--
--
•*
••
-•
23
••
-
--
••
--
24
—
••
--
••
-
25
-•
••
FINAL/AVC
120
88.778
0.511
1.660
93.6
114.2
ng/dica
gr/dscf
lb/hr
Kg/hr
U0
ag/dsca
gr/dscf
lb/hr
Kg/hr
«fl
ag/dsca
gr/dsca
lb/hr
Kg/hr
chrcoe 100.000ug
Concentration, ag/dsca: 43.352x 10-3
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.019k 10-3
Eaisaion Rate,lb/hr PMfte: 3.198* 10-3
Eaisaion Rate,Kg/hr PMftc: 1.450* 10-3
nickel 100.000ug
Concentration, ag/dsca: 43.352* 10-3
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.019* 10-3
Eaitaion Rate.Lb/hr P*Rc: 3.198* 10-3
Eaisaion Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.450* 10-3
aetal lOO.OOOug
Concentration, ag/dtca: 43.352x 10-3
Concentration, gr/dsca: 0.019* 10*3
Eaisaion Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 3.198* 10*3
Emission Bate,Kg/hr PMSc: 1.450* 10-3
C-35
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RB8PLT8 TABULATION
Plant: Site9
Sampling Location: outlet
Hat Run Tiae: 120 ain
Nua Sampling Points: 8
ten no.: OUT—NI-2D Oate: 5/30/90
Operator: rla
Rin Start Tiae: 12:31
Rir Stop Tina: 18:40
ISOKINETIC DATA
Noz2le Nu4>er:
t-6
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Pber Baroaetric Pressure, in Hg:
28.800
Dia
Mozzle Oiaaeter, in:
0.239
Pg Flue Gee Static Press, (n H20:
-0.180
A
Stack/Ouct Area, in2:
1319.5
Pa Abaolute Flue Caa Prat*, in Kg:
28.787
Vs
flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
42.3
Gad
Voluaetric Air Flow Rate,
Ory SCFM: 19590.0
Moisture Data:
Qaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Vet ACFM: 23237.3
Vie Vol. Liquid Collected, al:
70.3
x;
Isokinetic Seapllng Rate,
X: 83.9
ViKstd) Voluaa of Water Vapor, SCF:
3.309
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
4.70
Va<0ry) Voluae Oat Metered, Ory:
75.095
XCQ2 Percent C02 by Volune, Ory:
4.30
va
Delta R
(in H2D)
Caa Meter
Ten© (oF)
Stack
Teno (oF>
ug
ag/dsca
gr/decf
Lb/hr
1
0:00
605.325
0.420
1.360
65.0
115.0
Kg/hr
2
0:15
615.009
0.550
1.780
75.0
117.0
3
0:30
626.118
0.490
1.580
86.0
117.0
ug
4
0:45
636.444
0.550
1.780
94.0
116.0
ag/dsca
5
1:00
646.777
0.580
1.900
102.0
113.0
gr/dsca
6
1:15
658.219
0.480
1.SS0
106.0
117.0
Lb/hr
7
1:30
668.909
0.560
1.010
110.0
115.0
xg/hr
8
1:45
680.420
0.470
1.520
112.0
104.0
9
120/OFF
680.420
EMISSIONS RESULTS
chrona 100.000ug
Concentration, ag/dsca: 52.654* 10*3
Concantration, gr/dscf: 0.023* 10-3
Eaisalon late,lb/hr Pftftc: 3.863k 10-3
Eaission Rate,Kg/hr PKRc: 1.752* 10-3
nickal 100.000**
Conetitration, «a/d$ca: 52.654* 10-3
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.023* 10-3
Ealsslon Rata,Lb/hr PMRc: 3.863* 10-3
Eaiasion Rate.Kg/hr PMfic: 1.752* 10*3
aetal 100.000uq
Concentration, ag/dsaa: 52.654* 10-3
Concentration, gr/ds«a: 0.023* 10-3
Eaission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 3.863* 10-3
Eaission Rete,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.752* 10-3
FIHAl/AVG 120
75,095
0.511
1.660
93-S
C-36
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN PIELD DATA AND RE8ULT8 TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Stapling location: inlet
Run No.: IN-MMTL-4A Date: 6/4/90
Operator: IT
Met Run Tiae: 60 afn Run
Start Tiae: 1205
ISOKINETIC
DATA
Nui Sampling Points: 4 Rin Stop Tine: 1305
Nozzle Nirter:
Pressures:
CP
Pitot TuPe Coef.:
0.840
Pbar
Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.200
Oia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.375
P9
Flue Gas Static Press, in n20:
Q.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
14400.0
Ps
Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
29.200
V8
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec
27.3
Qsd
Volumetric Air Flow Rate,
Ory SCFM:
42693.7
Moisture Data:
Qaw
Voluaetrlc Air Flow Rate,
Wet ACFM:
163535.0
Vie
Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
166.S
XI
isokinetic Sampling Rate,
X:
114.6
Vw(«td) VoIum of Water Vapor, SCF:
7.437
XH2Q
Moisture Content, X by vol.:
25.62
Va<0ry>
Voluae Gas Metered, Dry:
24.596
XC02
Percent C02 by Voluae, Dry:
S.00
Vn(Std)
Voluee Gaa Metered, Std:
22.521
*02
Percent 02 by Voluae, Dry:
14.00
Mfd
Dry Mole Fraction:
0.742
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.38
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Nd
Estinatad Dry Mol. Wt, lb/Lb-Hole:
30.00
Ms
Wet Mol. Wt, Lb/Lb-Mole:
26.90
ag
100.0
too. 000^
FIELD DATA
Meter lax IKBfeer: RAC 1
Dry Cat Meter Cel. Y: 1.000
Leak Test Rate, CFM: 0.016
Meter Box dHa: 1.351
AseuKd Moisture: 30.00
Leak Tett Vac. fn Hg: 3.00
ng/dtca
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
ICg/hr
Point
N<*
Sample
Tl«e
(ain)
Dry Gat
Meter Reading
(cu ft)
Delta P
(in H2t»
Delta H
(In H?o>
Cm Meter
Ttwo (oF)
Stack
Teflo (oF)
¦8
BQ/dsca
gr/dacf
Lb/hr
1
0
312.725
0.070
0.500
102.0
929.0
Kg/hr
2
15
318.821
0.080
0.500
103.0
1182.0
3
30
325.987
0.090
0.500
103.0
1206.0
»g
4
45
331.218
0.070
0.500
105.0
703.0
ag/dsaa
5
60/OFF
337.321
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Concentration, ag/6sca: 156.807
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.069
CaiMion Rata, lb/hr PHRej 25.072
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 11.373
100.0 100.000ag
Concentration, ao/dtca: 156.607
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.069
Eafaaion Rate,Lb/hr PMftc: 25.072
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PNRc: 11.373
100.0
Concentration, i^/dsca:
100.00Q«g
156.807
FlNAl/AVG 60
24.596
0.077
103.2
1004.2
- C-37
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
piwit: Site 9
Stapling Location: Inlet
Blti No.: IN-KMTL-4B Date: 6/4/90
Operator: IT
Net Rin
Tiae: 60 Bin
Sid Start Tine: 1220
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nut Sampling Points: 4
Run Stop Time: 1320
Nozzle Nuitoer:
Pressures:
CP
Pitot Tub* Coef.:
0.840
Pbar
larooetric Pressure, in Kg:
29.200
Oia
Nozzle Oiaaeter, in:
0.375
Pfl
Flue Cat Static Press, in H20:
0.000
A
Staclc/Duct Area, in2:
14400.0
Ps
Absolute Flue Cas Press, in Hg:
29.200
VS
Flue Cas Velocity, Ft/sec:
27.3
Q&d
Volunetric Air Flow Rata, Ory SCFH:
47612.2
Moisture Data:
flaw
Voluaetrfc Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFM:
163937.4
Vic
Vol. Liquid Collected, al:
145.0
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
100.5
Vw(std)
Voluw of Water Vapor, SCF:
6.825
XH20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
23.66
VfD(Ory)
volme Gas Metered, Dry:
24.160
XCQ2
Percent C02 by Volume, Dry:
5.00
Vm(Std)
Volume Cas Metered, Std:
22.024
X02
Percent 02 by Volune, Cry:
14.00
Nfd
Dry Mole Fraction:
0.763
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.38
EMIS8I0NS RESULTS
Nd
UtiMted Cry Not. Vt, Ib/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Ns
Uet Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
27.16
ag
100.0 ioo.oo
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AMD RESPLT3 TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sanpling Location: Inlet
Met tun Tfaa: 60 Bin
Nia Sampling points: 4
Run Ko.: IN-NI-4C Data: 6/4/90
Operator: LT
Sun Start Tiae: 1206
Run Stop Time: 1506
ISOKINETIC DATA
Pressures:
Pbar
Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.200
Flue Gas Static Preaa. in H20:
0.000
Pa
Absolute Flue Gas Press. in Hg:
29.200
Moisture Data:
Vic
Vol. Liquid Collected, al:
243.0
Vw(atd)
Voltav of Uater Vapor, SCF:
11.438
XH20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
33.13
XC02
Percent C02 by Vol una, Ory:
5.00
102
Percent 02 by Volune, Ory:
14.00
Mfd
Ory Mole Fraction:
0.669
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.38
Nd
Estimated Ory Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
30.00
wet Mol. Ut. Lb/Lb-Mole:
26.02
Mojzle Niaber:
CP
Pi tot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Die
Noazle Diamter, in:
0.375
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
14400.0
VS
flue Caa Velocity, Ft/sec
i 28.2
fed
Voluaetric Air FIom Rate,
Ory SCFM: 42110.9
Qaw
Volunetrfc Air Flow Rate,
Uet ACFM: 169174.1
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,
X: 119.1
V«K0ry)
Voluae Gas Metered, Ory:
25.066
VoKStd)
Voluae Caa Metered, Std:
23.085
FIELD DATA
Keter fox lhafcert RAC 2
Ory Gas Natar Cal. T: 1.000
Leak Teat Rata, CM: 0.011
Saaple Ory Caa
Point Km Natar Reading
(«ln) (cu ft)
Meter 8ox dKa: 1.855
AtftUMd NoUture: 30.00
Leak Test Vac, in Kg: 3.00
Oalta P
0" H2Q?
Oalta H
(fn H2Q)
Caa Natar
Two
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN PIELD DATA AND RE8DLT8 TABULATION
Plant: 8it« 9
Saaplino location: Inlet
Met Rin Ila*: 60 ain
Nia stapling Points: 4
Kvri No.: IN-NI-4D Date: 6/4/90
Operator: LT
Run Start Tint; 1207
Run Stop Tlae: 1307
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle Nwber:
Pressures:
Cp
PUot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Pbar iaroaetric Pressure, in Kg:
29.200
oia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.375
Pg Flue Cas Static Press, in K20;
0.000
A
Stack/Ouct Area, in2:
14400.0
Ps Absolute Flue Cas Press, in Hg:
29.200
Vt
Flue Cat velocity. Ft/tec:
26.8
Qsd
Voluaetric Air Flow Rate, Ory SCFM:
47186.1
Moisture Data:
Qaw
volumetric Air Flow Rate, wet ACFM:
172663.3
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, at:
156.0
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
101.3
Vw(std) Volun* of Water Vapor, SCF:
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
%C02 Percent CO2 by VolUM, Dry:
X02 Percent 02 by Vol in®, Dry:
Mfd Ory Hole Fraction:
Fo Or sat Validation Value:
Md Estiasted Dry MoI. tft, Lb/lb*Mole: 30.00
Nt Wet Not. Vt. Lb/lb*Mole: 27.00
7.343
25.04
5.00
14.00
0.750
1.36
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Mi*toer: RAC 3
Ory Cat Meter cel. 1: 1.000
Leak Test Kate, CFM: 0.013
Meter Box dHa;
Assmed Moisture:
leak Test Vac, in Kg:
1.849
30.00
5.00
Vn(0ry) Voli*e Cas Metered, Ory: 23.874
Vn(Std) Voluae Cas Metered, Std: 21.987
EMISSIONS RESULTS
I100.0 100.000*
ag/dsca Concentration, ag/dsca: 160.617
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.070
Ib/hr Caission late,Ib/hr PMKc: 26.364
kg/hr Eaission Rate,kg/hr PWc: 12.$75
«8
100.0 100.000*
Saaple
Dry Cae
ag/dsca
Concentration, ag/dsca: 160.617
Point
Jim
Meter Reading
oelta P
oelta H
Cas Meter
Staek
gr/dscf
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.070
Nl«
(ainl
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Planet 8ite 9
Saapling location: Hid point
Sun No.: MID~MMTL~4A Date: 6/4/90
Operator: CCS
Net tin Tiae: 45 sin
Run Start Tiae: 1229
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nub Saapllng Poifttt: 3
Ru> Stop Tiae: 1314
Nozzle Niober:
T27
Pressures:
CP
Pi tot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Pbar Bareaetric Pressure, in Kg:
29.200
Ota
Nozzle Dianeter, in:
0.245
Pg flue Oat Static Pre*#. In h20:
•30.000
A
Steck/ouct Area, in2:
1319.5
P« Absolute Flue Gas Press. in Ng:
26.994
Vs
Flue Caa Velocity, Ft/sec:
31.6
Cfcd
VoluMtric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
14597.5
Moisture Data:
taw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFM:
17349.3
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, Ml:
19.0
X!
isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
76.6
Vw(atd) Votim of Water Vapor, SCF:
0.894
XM20 Noiatur* Content, X by Vol.:
4.74
VoKOry)
Volune Caa Metered, Ory:
19.610
XC02 Percent CQ2 by Voluae, Ory:
5.00
Va(Std)
Voluae Gaa Metered, Std:
17.977
202 Percent 02 by Volute, Ory:
14.00
Mfd - Ory Holt Fraction:
0.953
Fo Oraat Validation Value: 1.38
Nd Eatiaated Dry Hoi. tft, Lb/lb-*ole: 30.00
M* Wet Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.43
Hater lox ikafcar:
Ory Sat *at«r Cal. T:
Leek Teat Rata, CFM:
yigpp pata
A-1
0.986
0.003
Hatar Box dKa: 2.270
Aawjaed Moisture: 7.00
Le«k Teat Vac, in Hg: 10.00
EMIS8ION8 RESULTS
¦q 100. 100.000WQ
¦0/dsca Concentration, ag/dsca: 196.447
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dacf: 0.086
Lb/hr Eaistion Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 10.740
Kfl/tir Eaission Rate,Kg/hr Ptttc: 4.871
¦0
100.0 100.000^
Saaple
Ory Caa
ag/daca
Concentration, ag/daca:
196.447
Point
Tiae
Meter Reading
Oelta P
Oelta N
Caa Meter
Steele
gr/daef
Concentration, gr/daef:
0.086
Nua
fain)
feu ft>
(in M20>
(in H20)
Teno (oF)
T«0O (OF)
Lb/hr
Eaission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc:
10.740
1
0
56.210
0.160
0.650
95.0
82.0
KB/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc:
4.871
2
15
62.459
0.360
1.500
95.0
78.0
3
30
71.862
0.360
1.500
98.0
78.0
ng
100.0
100.000b«
4
45/OFF
75.820
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
F1NAI/AVG 45
19.610
0-284
lillL
96.0
79.3
C-41
-------
ISOKINETIC 8AMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Stapling location: Midpoint
Run No.: KID-MMTL-4B Date: 6/4/90
Operator: CCS
Met Run Tiae: 45 ain
Riti Start Tiae: 1231
ISOKINETIC DATA
Mia Sanpling Points: 3
Run Stop Ttae: 1316
Nozzle Waiter:
T29
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Pber Barooetric Pressure, in Hg:
29.200
Oia
Nozzle Oiaaeter, in:
0.245
Pg Flue Cas Static Press. In H20:
•30.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, (n Hg
26.994
VS
Flue Caa Velocity, Ft/sec:
31.2
Osd
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
14454.2
Moisture Data:
Qsm
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM:
17170.9
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, al:
19.0
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
80.2
Vw
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN PIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: 6it© 9
Saapling location: Midpoint
Net Run Tiae: 45 afn
Hub Saapltng Points: 3
Run No.: KID-NI-4C Date: 6/4/90
Operator: GC8
Run Start Time: 1233
Rin Stop Tiae: 1318
Pressures:
Ptoar Barcaetric Pressure, in Kg: 29.200
Pg Flu* Gas Static Press, in H20: -30.000
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg: 26.994
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, al; 17.0
Vw(std) VoIum of Water Vapor, SCF: 0.800
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.: 4.96
XCOZ Percent C02 by Voluae, Dry: 5.00
X02 Percent 02 by Voluae, Dry: 14.00
Mfd Dry Hole Fraction: 0.950
fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.38
Md Estimated Ory Hoi. Wt, Lb/Lb-Hole: 30.00
Ms Wet ftol. Ut, Lb/lb-Mole: 29.40
PIELD DATA
Hater Box Murtxr: B-1
Ory Gas M«ter Ca(. Y: 1.034
Leak Test Rata, CFM: 0.001
Meter tox dHa: 2.043
Assuaed Moisture: 7.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 10.00
Saaple
Point Tiae
WW cin)
Ory Gaa
Meter Reading
to
Oelta P
On m
Delta K
H2Q)
Caa Meter
Te»p (of)
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle Nurber:
T30
Cp
Pitot Til* Coef.:
0.840
Oia
Hozzle Oiaaeter, in:
0.245
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
32.9
Q&d
Volmetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
15106.7
flaw
Voluaetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM:
18067.4
Xi
isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
62.8
V«<0ry>
Voluae Gas Metered, Dry;
15.895
V»
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: 8ite 9
Stapling Location: Nfdpotnt
Het Run Tia»: (5 aln
Nua Saddling Points: 3
Run Mo.: KID—NI—4D Oat«: 6/4/90
Operator: GCB
Run Start Tlae: 1236
8m Stop Tine: 1320
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle Mwber:
131
Pressures:
CP
Pitot Tii» Coef.:
0.840
Pber
Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.200
Die
Moztle 0'aaeter, In:
0.245
Pfl
Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
-30.000
A
Stack/Ouct Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps
Absolute Flue Gas Press. In Hg:
26.994
Vs
flue Gat Velocity, Ft/sec:
31.7
Qsd
Volmetric Air Flow Rate, Ory SCFM:
14686.5
Moisture Data:
Qau
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFM:
17409.7
Vic
Vol. Liquid Collected, al:
15.5
XI
Isokinetic Sailing Rate, X:
63.9
VtKttd) Vol use of water Vapor, SCF:
0.730
XM20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
4.61
Va<0ry) Vol use Gas Metered, Dry:
14.401
XC02
Pereent C02 by Volurae, Ory:
5.00
V^Std)
Voluae Gas Metered, Std:
15.098
X02
Percent 02 by Volim, Dry:
14.00
Mfd
Dry Mole Fraction:
0.954
FO
Orsat Validation Value:
1.38
EMIBSI0N8 RESULTS
Md
Estimated Dry Kol. Ut, Lb/lb-Mole:
30.00
Mt
Wet Mo1. tft, lb/Lb-Mole:
29.45
ag
100.0 100.000n«
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Iknfeer: fl-2
Dry Get Meter Cat. T: 1.131
Leak Test lata, CFH: 0.001
Meter Box <«a: 2.12S
Attuned Moisture: 7.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 10.00
Point
Sample
Ttae
<»inl
Ory Cm
Meter Reeding
Delta P
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RE8PLT8 TABULATION
Plant; Site 9
Saspling Location: Outlet
Net Run Tiae: 60 ain
hut Sampling Points; 4
No.: OUT-MMTL-4A Oate: 6/4/90
Operator: *LM
tut Start Tine: 1216
Ren Stop Tine: 1318
ISOKINETIC DATA
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
Pg Flue Cat Static Press, in H20:
Pt Absolute Flue Gas Press. In Hg:
Moisture Data:
29.300
•0.300
29.278
Vic
Vol. Liquid Collected, all
34.5
vw
Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
1.624
XAiO
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
3.98
XC02
Percent C02 by Volune, Cry:
S.00
X02
Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
14 .CO
Mfd
Dry Mole Fraction:
0.960
fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.38
Md
Estimated Dry Hoi. Vt, Lb/Lb-Hole:
30.00
MS
wet Mol. Vt, Lb/lb-Mole:
29.52
Nozzle Mutoer:
T-7
CP
Pitot Tub* Coef.:
0.840
Oia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.242
A
Stack/Doct Area, in2:
1319.5
Vs
Flue Cas Velocity, Ft/sec:
39.7
Qtd
VoluMtrlc Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
18288.3
Osw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Met ACFN:
21831.9
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
102.5
Vrs(Ory)
Voluae Gas Metered, Dry:
41.500
VeiCStd)
Volune Cas Metered, Std:
39.204
Meter lox Huafaer:
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y:
Leak Test Sate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
EK-2
0.985
0.001
Meter tox dHa: 1.969
Assuaed Moisture: 7.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 8.00
•g/dsca
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
Point
Num
Saaple
Ttae
<«in>
Dry Cas
Meter Reading
-------
I8QKINETIC 8AMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling location: Outlet
Sun no.; OUT-MMTL-4B oete: 6/4/90
Operator: RIM
Net Ri*i Tiaa: 60 a(n
Run Start Tine: 1219
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nu* Saapling Points: 4
Rji Stop Tiae: 1319
Nozzle Nuifcer:
7-7
Pressures:
Cp
Pi tot Tii* Coef.:
0.640
Pber Barometric Pressure, in Ng:
29.300
Oia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.243
Pg Flue Gaa Static Press, in H20:
•0.300
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Pa Abaolute flue Gas Press, in Kg
29.278
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
39.7
Qsd
Voluaetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
18232.5
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Voluwtric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFM:
21846.0
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, al;
38.5
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X*.
103.9
Vtrtstd) Voluw of Water Vapor, SCF:
1.812
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
4.34
VntfDry)
Volume Gas Metered, Dry:
44.629
XCC2 Percent COS by Volute, Dry:
5.00
Va(Std) Volone Gas Metered, Std:
39.936
X02 Percent 02 by Voluae, Dry:
14.00
Kfd £ry Mole Fraction:
0.957
Fo ortat Validation Value; 1.38
Nd Estfaated Dry Not. Ut, Lb/Lb-Molet 30.00
Ks Wet Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.46
Meter Box Nufcer:
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y:
leek raat Rata, CFM:
FIELD DATA
EH-4
0.932
0.001
Point
Saaple
TiM
Dry fiaa
Meter Reading
Oelta P
Meter Sox dHa: 1.969
Unwed Moisture: 7.00
Leak Teat Vac, in Hg: 5.00
Oelta H Gaa Meter Stack
1
0
54.034
0.360
1
00
77.0
128.0
2
15
64.170
0.430
1
560
60.0
139.0
3
30
75.060
0.500
1
640
86.0
131.0
4
45
67.070
0.460
1
770
90.0
131.0
5
60/0FF
96.663
6
•
••
••
--
••
7
•
••
••
--
-•
6
-
--
••
-
••
9
-
--
-
--
10
-•
••
•
••
-•
11
••
-
-
--
12
--
-¦
••
—
13
-•
-•
-
--
U
••
-
-•
-•
15
--
-
*•
16
-•
-~
-
-•
-
17
••
••
•
—
--
18
••
-
-
-
19
-•
--
•
--
-•
20
-•
—
-
--
-
21
-•
••
-
•-
-
22
--
—
-
-
--
23
-•
-
••
--
24
••
••
•
••
-
25
••
••
•
FINAL/AVG
60
44.629
0.446
1.647
83.2
132.2
EMI88I0N8 RESULTS
ag 100.0 100.000ag
•g/dsca Concentration, ng/dsaa: 88.426
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.039
Lb/hr Eaistion Kate,lb/hr PMRc: 6.038
rg/hr Eataston Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 2.739
WQ 100.0 100.000ag
ng/dsca Concentration, ag/dsca: 00.426
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.039
Lb/hr Eaitsion late,Lb/hr PWtc: 6.036
Kg/hr Eaitaion Rate.Kg/hr PMRc: 2.739
ag/dsca
100.0
Concentration, ag/dsca:
100.000^
86.428
C-46
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RE80LTS TABULATION
Plant: 8ite 9
Sampling Location: Outlet
Net Rui Tiae: 60 ®1n
Nus Stapling Points: 4
Run no.: OUT-NI-4C Date: 6/4/90
Operator*. BIN
Run Start Tine: 1218
tun Stop Tlae: 1318
ISOKINETIC DATA
Pressures;
Pbar Beroaetric Pressure, in Kg: 29.300
Pg Flue Gat Static Press, in h20: *0.300
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg: 29.278
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, nl: 31.0
Vw(std) Voluae of Water Vapor, SCf: 1.459
SH20 Moisture Content, X by vol.: 3.58
XC02 Percent C02 by Voluae, Dry: 5.00
102 Percent 02 by Voluae, Dry: U.00
Nfd Dry Hole Fraction: 0.964
Fo Oraat Validation Value: 1.38
M Estimated ory Hoi. wt, Lb/Lb-Hole: 30.00
Ms Wet Hoi. Vt, lb/Lb-Hole: 29.57
Nozzle Nuatoer:
T-5
cp
Pitot Tiiw Coef.:
O.SAO
Oia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.244
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.S
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
39.7
Qsd
Voluaetric Air Flow Rate,
Ory SCFM:
18349.4
OSW
Volmetrie Air Flow Rate,
Uet ACFM:
21814.2
XI
isokinetic Sampling Rate,
X:
100.8
Va(Dry) Voluae Gas Metered, Dry:
42.360
vm(Std)
Voluae Gas Metered, Std:
39.320
Meter Sox Nufcer:
Ory Gas Meter Cal. Y:
Leak Test Rata, CFM:
PIELD DATA
N-16
0.996
0.002
Mater Box dKa: 1.820
Assuaed Moisture: 7.00
Leak Test Vac, in Kg: 15.00
¦9
ag/dscm
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
EMISSIONS RESULTS
100.0 100.000og
Concentration, ag/dsca: 89.813
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.039
Eaission lata,lb/hr PMKc: 6.172
Eaission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 2.800
100.0
100.000BV
Saaple
Dry Gas
ag/dsca
Concentration, ag/dsca: 89.813
Point
Tiae
Meter Reading
Oelta P
Oelta H
Gas Meter
Stack
gr/dscf
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.039
Nun
fain)
ecu ft)
(in H20)
(in H20>
Teno
Teao (of)
Lb/hr
Eaission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 6.172
1
0
312.154
0.380
1.270
84.0
128.0
Kg/hr
Eaission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 2.800
2
15
321.022
0.430
1.440
92.0
139.0
3
30
332.315
0.500
1.670
101.0
131.0
og
100.0 lOO.OOOag
4
45
343.350
0.480
1.610
109.0
131.0
ng/dsca
Concentration, ag/dsca: 89.813
5
6
7
60/0FF
3S4.514
-
-
-•
--
8
9
10
-
--
--
--
--
--
11
--
••
--
••
--
12
-•
-•
--
--
--
13
••
-•
••
--
14
--
--
15
..
• •
-•
• •
16
--
-•
¦¦
••
17
••
• -
••
••
18
-
••
••
--
19
-•
--
••
--
20
--
••
*•
21
••
-•
••
--
22
••
-
••
--
23
--
••
••
24
-
••
••
25
*•
•*
HNAL/AVC
60
42,360
0.446
1.497
96.5
132.2
C-47
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN PIELD DATA AND RESULT8 TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling location: Outlet
Net Run Tiae: 60 m1n
Hum Saopling Points: 4
Run No.: OUT-NI-4D Oate: 6/4/90
Operator: RLH
Run Start Tiae: 1219
Run Stop Tiae: 1319
ISOKINETIC DATA
Mozzle Nurtxr:
T-6
Pressures:
CP
Pi tot Tube Coef.:
0.640
Pbar
teroaetric Pressure, in Hg:
29.300
Dia
Mozzle Ofaaeter, in:
0.239
Pfl
Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
•0.300
A
Steck/Buct Area, in2:
1319.5
PS
Abeolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
29.278
V6
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
39.7
Qsd
Volimtric Air Flow Rate, Ory SCFM:
16264.7
Moisture Data:
Qaw
VoluKtric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFM:
21642.2
VlC
Vol. Liquid Collected, al:
34.0
XI
isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
100.3
vw(std) Voluae of Water Vapor, SCF:
1.600
XM20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
4.11
VMDry) Voli*#e Gas Metered, Dry:
41.416
XC02
Percent C02 by Voluw, Dry:
S.00
VoKStd)
Volume Gas Metered, Std:
37.378
X02
Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
14.00
Hfd
Dry Mole Fraction:
0.959
fo
Oraat Validation Value:
1.36
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Md
Estiaated Ory Mol. Vt, Lb/Lb-Mole:
30.00
MS
Uet Mol. ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
29.51
no
100. 100.00fr*
Meter Box Umber:
Dry Cm Meter Cel. r:
leek Teet Rate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
ML-7
0.969
0.002
Meter Iox
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Inlet
Run No.: IN-MMTL-9A Date: 6/5/90
Operator: IT
Wet Run Time: 117 min
Run Start Time: 1850
ISOKINETIC
DATA
kxi Sarpling Points: 8
Run Stop T ime: 2050
N02zle Nurt>er:
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.600
Die
Nozzle Diameter, In:
0.375
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in K20:
0.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
14400.0
P$ Absolute flue Gas Press, in Hg:
29.600
VS
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec
: 26.1
Osd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Dry SCFM: 33073.8
Moisture Data.:
04 w
Volumetric Air Flow Rate,
Wet ACFM: 15675:.9
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
408.3
XI
Isokinetic Saopling Rate,
X: 167.4
Vw(std) Volute of Water Vapor, SCF:
19.219
XK20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
27.89
Vm(Dry)
Volume Gas Metered, Dry:
53.573
XC02 Percent C02 by VoLum, Dry:
5.00
VnKStd)
Vol use Gas Metered, Std:
49.682
XD2 Percent 02 by Vol we. Dry:
14.00
Mr'd Dry Hole Fraction:
0.721
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.38
Hd Estimated Dry Hoi. Ut, Lb/lb-Molc: 30.00
Ms Wet Hoi. Vt, Lb/Lb-Hole: 26.65
Meter Box Nutber:
Dry Gas Meter Cel. T:
Leak Test Rate. CFM:
FIELD DATA
RAC 1
1.000
0.016
Meter Box dHe: 1.651
Assumed Moisture: 30.00
leak Test Vac, in Kg: 5.00
Point
WLfl
Sample
Tine
(mirrt
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
(cu ft)
Delta P
(in h20)
Delta h
(In H20>
Gas Meter
Ten© (oF)
Stack
Temo (oF)
1
0
402.126
0.060
0.600
90.0
1285.C
2
15
409.150
0.070
0.600
91.0
1289.C
3
30
415.800.
0.070
0.600
97.0
1290.0
4
45
422.450
0.050
0.600
98.0
1311.0
5
60
429.560
0.050
0.600
110.0
1370.0
6
75
436.480
0.050
0.600
114.0
1354.0
7
90
443.310
0.060
0.600
115.0
1319.0
8
105
455.701
0.060
0.600
116.0
1383.0
9
117/OFF
455.701
10
—
••
••
••
-
-
11
-•
••
-•
-*
-•
12
--
-•
—
-
-•
-•
13
-
--
--
--
-•
14
-•
--
--
-
--
15
-•
-•
-
--
-•
16
-•
-
••
-•
17
--
• •
--
-•
• •
18
--
-¦
-•
••
19
-•
-•
••
• •
20
-•
•-
--
-•
--
21
••
•-
--
-•
--
22
-•
-
--
--
-•
23
-•
--
--
-•
--
--
24
--
--
••
••
••
25
•*
-•
F1NAL/AVG
117
53.573
0.058
0.60C
103.9
1325.1
mg
mg/dsem
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
if9
mg/dsem
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
ng
¦tg/dsco)
gr/dsoa
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
EMISSIONS RESULTS
100.0 100.00Cito
Concentration, ng/dscm: 71.081
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.031
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 8.804
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 3.994
100.0 100.0C0og
Concentration, mg/dscm: 71.081
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.031
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 8.804
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 3.994
100.0
Concentration.
mg/dscn:
Concentration, gr/dsca:
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc:
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PHRc:
lOO.OOOmg
71.081
0.031
8.804
3.994
:-49
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AMD RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: tnlet
Net Run Tine: 116 min
Kun Sampling Points: 8
Run Ho.: IN-MMTL-9B Date: 6/5/90
Operator: LT
Run Start T{me: 1851
Run Stop Time: 2051
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Kg:
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, nl:
Vw(std) Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
XK20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
XC02 Percent C02 by Volume, Dry:
XD2 Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
Nfd Dry Hole Fraction:
Fo Orsat Validation Value:
Hd Estimated Dry Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Hole: 30.00
fcs Uet Hoi. ut, Lb/Lb-Hole: 26.80
29.600
0.000
29.600
390.0
18.357
26.68
5.00
14.00
0.733
1.38
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nczzle Hu^ber:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.375
A
Stuck/Duct Area, in2:
14400.0
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
26.6
Csd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFH:
34187.7
Oaw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFM:
159562.5
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
165.9
Vii(Dry)
Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
54.328
Vm(Std)
Voluw Gas Metered, Std:
50.461
Meter Box Mixber:
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y:
Leak Test Rate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
RAC 5
1.000
0.017
Meter Box dHa: 1.869
Assured Moisture: 30.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 5.00
EMISSIONS RESULTS
mg 100.0 100.000mg
mg/dscn Concentration, ng/dsca: 69.985
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.031
Ib/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 8.961
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 4.064
Point
HiXl
Sample
Tine
(min)
Dry Gas
Meter Reeding
(cu ft)
Oelta P
(in H2C»
Delta N
(in H2C)
Gas Meter
Tea© (oF)
Stack
let-© (oF)
«8
ng/dscm
gr/dscf
lb/hr
100.0 100.0C0mg
Concentration, mg/dscm: 69.985
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.031
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 8.961
1
0
553.273
0.070
0.600
90.0
1288.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc:
4.064
2
15
560.500
0.060
0.600
91.C
1284.0
3
30
567.390
0.070
0.600
97.C
1278.0
mg
100.0
100.000«*
4
45
574.480
0.040
0.600
101.0
1369.0
og/dscm
Concentration, mg/dscn:
69.985
5
60
580.915
0.060
0.600
107.0
1311.0
gr/dsca
Concentration, gr/dsan:
0.031
6
75
587.750
0.070
0.600
111.0
1358.0
Lb/hr
E&ission Rate,Lb/hr PKRc:
8.961
7
90
594.825
0.060
0.600
113.0
1340.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc
4.064
8
105
602.300
0.060
0.603
114.0
1393.C
9
116/OFF
607.601
FIKM./AVG 116
54.328
0.061
103.0
1327.6
C-50
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location; Inlet
lie? Run Tine: 115 cnfrt
Hup Sanpling Points: 6
Run Mo.: IN-NI-9C Date: 6/5/90
Operator: LT
Run Start Tint: 1652
Run Stop Time: 2052
Pressures:
Pbor Barometric Pressure, in Hg: 29.600
Pg Flu« Gas Static Press, in K20: 0.000
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg: 29.600
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, al: 382.0
Vw(std) Volune of Water Vapor, SCF: 17.961
XM20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.: 27.05
XCQ2 Percent COS by Volume, Dry: 5.00
X02 Percent 02 by Volune, Dry: U.OO
Mfd Pry Molt Fraction: 0.730
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.38
Md Estimated Dry Hot. Wt, Lb/Lb-Molt: 3C.09
Ms Wet Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 26.75
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle Nurfcer:
Cp Pitot Tii* Coef.:
Dia Nczzle Diameter, in:
A Stack/Duct Area, in2:
Vs Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
Osd Volunctric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
Qaw Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Wat ACfM:
XI Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
VoKDry) Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
VnKStd) Volur* Gas Metered, Std:
C.840
0.375
14400.0
27.2
34768.2
163290.5
158.2
52.300
48.502
Meter Box Nmber:
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y:
Leak Test Rate, CFH:
FIELD DATA
RAC 2
1.000
0.019
Meter Box dHa; 1.858
Assuntd Moisture: 30.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 5.00
Point
Sonple
Time
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
Delta P
delta H Gas Meter
Stack
115/OFF 399.640
ng
mg/dscra
er/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
rr«g
mg/dscm
gr/dscf
Nun
(¦in)
Ccu ft)
{in H20)
(in H201
Tenu (oF)
Tpto (oF)
Lb/hr
1
0
347.340
0.060
0.600
91.0
1290.0
Kg/hr
2
15
354.300
0.070
0.600
92.0
1289.0
3
30
360.900
0.070
0.600
98.0
1285.0
mg
4
45
367.660
0.060
0.600
101.0
1311.0
¦g/dsc*
5
60
374.600
0.050
0.600
108.0
1355.0
gr/dscn
6
75
381.550
0.070
0.600
113.0
1564.0
Lb/hr
7
90
388.310
C.070
0.600
113.0
1346.0
Kg/hr
8
105
394.950
0.060
0.600
115.0
1398.0
EMISSIONS RESULTS
100.0 100.000mg
Concentration, nts/dscni: 72.811
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.032
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 9.481
Eaission Rate,Kg/hr PMftc: 4.300
100.0 10C.000mg
Concentration, fag/dscm: 72.811
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.032
Enission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 9.481
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 4.300
1CO.O 100.000ms
Concentration, ms/dscw: 72.811
Concentration, gr/dsca: 0.032
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 9.481
Enission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 4.300
FIHAL/AVC 115
52.300
0.064
0.600
103.9
1329.7
C-51
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: 8ite 9
Sampling Location: Inlet
Run mo.: IN-NI—9D Date: 6/5/90
Operator: LT
het Rin
Time: 117 m1n
Run
Start Time: 1853
ISOKINETIC DATA
kun sampling Points: 8
Run
Stop T ime: 2053
Nozzle Nurtoer:
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Pbo-
6oro®etric Pressure, in Hg:
29.600
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
C.375
P9
flue Gas Static Press, in H<0;
o.oco
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2;
14400.0
Ps
Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Kg:
29.600
VS
flue Gas Velocity, ft/sec:
27.3
Osd
Volunctric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
33903.6
Moisture Data:
Qaw
Volunetric Air flow Rate, Uet ACfM:
163873.6
VIC
Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
400.9
XI
Isokinetic Sanpling Rate, X:
149.4
Vw(std)
Voluae of Water Vapor, SCF:
18.870
XaZO
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
29.34
Vm(Dry)
Volume Gas Metered, Dry:
48.818
XC02
Percent C02 by Voluna, Dry:
S.00
VitKStd)
Voluae Gas Metered, Std:
4S.444
X02
Percent 02 by vclune, Ory:
14.00
Mfd
Dry Molt Fract ion:
0.707
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.38
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Md
Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
30.00
Ms
Wet Mol. Wt, Lb/Lb-Mole:
26.48
«e
100.0 100.000mg
Meter Box Nmt*r:
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y:
Leak Test Rate, CFH:
FIELD DATA
RAC 3
1.000
0.013
Meter Sox dHa: 1.849
Assuaed Moisture: 30.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 5.00
mg/dscm Concentration, mg/dsc»: 77.711
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dsef: 0.034
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 9.867
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMftc: 4.476
Point
Uin
Sample
Tine
(mir»
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
(cu ft)
Delta P
(in h2C)
Delta K
fin K20)
Gas Meter
Tefl© (of)
Stack
Tetrr (of)
mg
¦g/dscjr
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
100.0 100.000ms
Concentration, a^/dscn: 77.711
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.034
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 9.867
1
0
59.577
0.060
0.600
89.0
1290.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PHRc:
4.476
2
15
66.000
0.070
0.600
91.0
1288.0
3
30
72.190
0.060
0.600
98.0
1285.0
og
100.0
100.000ag
4
45
78.750
0.050
0.600
102.0
1310.0
ng/dsoa
Concentration, mg/dsem:
77.711
5
60
85.210
0.070
0.600
104.0
1359.0
gr/dsca
Concentration, gr/dscn:
0.034
6
75
91.521
0.060
0.600
106.0
1324.0
tb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMSc:
9.867
7
90
98.120
0.070
0.600
110.0
1340.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc:
4.476
8
105
104.400
0.070
0.600
114.0
1396.0
9
117/OFF
108.395
FIHAL/AVG 117
48.818
0.064
0.600
101.7
1324.0
C-52
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: 6ite 9
Sanpling location: Midpoint
Net Run Time: 111 min
Nut Sampling Points: 8
RiNo.: MID-MMTL-9A Date: 6/5/90
Operator: CCB
Rirt Start Time: 1857
Rm Stop Time: 2048
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
Pfl Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, nl:
Vw(std) Volume of Water Vapor, SCF:
29.600
•30.000
27.394
74.0
3.483
x*2o
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
5.43
XC02
Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
5.00
X02
Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
14.00
Mfd
Dry Hole Fraction:
0.946
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.38
Md
Estimated DryMol. Wt, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms
Uet Mol. tft, Lb/Lb-Mole:
29.35
FIELD
DATA
ISOKINETIC
DATA
Nozzle kifTber:
T 27
Cp
Pi tot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Dla
Nozzle Diometer, in:
0.245
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec
33.1
Qsd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Dry SCFM:
15098.3
Oau
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Vet ACFM:
18183.5
XI
Isokinetic Sanpling Rate,
X:
101.4
|
o
3
Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
64.960
Vm(Std)
Volune Gas Metered, Std:
60.723
Meter Box NiBber: A»1
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y: 0.986
Leak Test Rate, CFM: 0.004
Meter Box dHa:
Assuned Moisture:
Leak Test Vac, in Kg:
2.270
7.00
10.00
EMISSIONS RESULT8
¦g 100.0 100.000mg
¦g/dscai Concentration, ag/dsem: 58.157
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.025
Lb/hr Emission Rate,Ib/hr PMRc: 3.288
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.492
Point
Nun
Seffpte
Time
Cas Meter
Tero (oF>
Stack
Tenc foF)
•9
¦g/dscia
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
1OC.0 100.003(1$
Concentration, mg/dscm: 58.157
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.025
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 3.288
1
0
235.740
0.360
1.400
90.0
88.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMSc.
1.492
2
15
244.805
0.300
1.200
90.0
91.0
3
30
2S3.248
0.300
1.200
90.0
91.0
¦e
100.0
loo.oooae
4
45
261.794
0.300
1.200
90.0
91.0
mg/dson
Concentration, mg/dsae:
58.157
5
60
270.365
0.300
1.200
94.0
91.0
gr/dscm
Concentration, gr/dscs:
0.02S
6
75
278.978
0.310
1.300
96.0
91.0
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc
3.288
7
90
287.864
0.310
1.300
96.0
91.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,ICg/hr PMRc
1.492
8
105
296.726
0.300
1.200
96.0
91.0
9
111/OFF
300.700
FlMAL/AVC 111
64.960
0.310
1.250
92.7
90.6
C-53
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sonpling Location: Midpoint
Run No.: MID-MMTL-9B Date: 6/6/90
Operator: GCb
Net Run Time: 111 nin
Run Start Tine: 1859
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nua Sampling Points: 8
Run Stop Time: 2048
Nozzle Nurtjer:
I 28
Pressures:
Cp
Pi tot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Kg:
29.600
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.245
Ps flwe Gas Static Press, in H20:
-30.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps Absolute Flue Cos Press, in Hg:
27.394
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, ft/sec:
32.8
Osd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Ory SCFM:
14931.1
Moisture Data:
Qaw
Voluwtric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFM:
18C59.6
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
82.3
XI
Isokinetic Sailing Rate, X:
106.1
Vw(std) Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
3.874
1x23 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
5.81
Vn(Dry) Volunt Gas Metered, Dry:
64.746
XC02 Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
5.00
Vn(Std)
Volune Gas Metered, Std:
62.811
XO2 Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
14.00
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction:
0.942
F© Orsat Validation Value: 1.38
Md Estimated Dry Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms Wet Hoi. Ut, Ib/lb-Mole: 29.30
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Kurtoer: A-2
Dry Gas Meter Cal. T: 1.024
Leak Test Kate, CFM: 0.031
Meter Box dHa: 2.047
Assuned Moisture: 7.00
Leak Test Vac, in Mg: 10.0C
EMISSIONS RESULTS
m 100.0 ioo.ooob*
mg/dsoa Concentration, ttQ/dscm: 56.223
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.025
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PKRc: 3.144
Kg/hr Emits ion Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.426
Point
Nun
Sample
Tine
(min)
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
(cu ft>
Delta P
fin H20)
Oelta H
(in H2p>
Cas Meter
Ten® (OF)
Stack
Teno (of)
mg
mg/dscm
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
1C0.0 lOO.OOOng
Concentration, mg/dscm: 56.223
Conccntration, gr/dscf: 0.025
Eni&sion Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 3.144
1
0
49.662
0.320
1.300
90.0
90.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.426
2
17
58.546
0.300
1.200
90.0
91.0
3
32
67.292
0.300
1.200
90.0
91.0
mg
100.0 lOO.OOOng
4
47
76.017
0.300
1.200
92.0
91.0
mg/dscm
Concentration, mg/dscm: 56.223
5
62
64.602
0.300
1.200
94.0
90.0
gr/dscm
Concentration, gr/dsca: 0.025
6
77
93.637
0.300
1.200
96.0
91.0
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,lb/hr PHRc: 3.144
7
92
102.392
0.310
1.300
96.0
91.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.426
8
107
111.449
0.310
1.300
96.0
91.0
9
111/OFF
114.408
F1NAL/AVC
64.746
0.305
1.237
93.0
90.7
C-54
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling location: Midpoint
Net Run Time: 107 nin
Nun sampling Points: 8
Rui Ho.: MID-NI-9C Dote: 6/5/90
Operator: GCB
Run Start Time: 1901
Run Stop Time: 2048
Pressures:
Pb«r Barometric Pressure, in Hg: 29.600
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20: >30.000
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg: 27.394
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml: 75.3
Vrf(std) VolLme of Water Vapor, SCf: 3.544
Xh20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.: 5.49
XC02 Percent C02 by Volwe, Dry: 5.00
%02 Percent 02 by Voluoe, Dry: 14.00
Mfd Dry Hole fraction: 0.945
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.38
Nd Estimated Dry Mol. Wt, Lb/lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms Uet Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.34
ISOKINETIC
DATA
Nozzle Murker:
T 30
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Die
Nozzle Diaeeter, in:
0.245
A
Stack/Ouct Area, in2:
1319.5
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec
32.8
Osd
Volumetric Air Flow Rote,
Cry SCFH:
14938.2
Qau
Volumetric Air Flow Rate,
Uet ACFM:
18014.8
XI
Isokinetic Sonplirtg Rate,
X:
106.9
Vm(Dry) Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
62.351
Vm(Std)
Volume Gas Metered, Std:
61.053
Meter Box Murber:
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y:
leak Test Rate, CFH:
FIELD DATA
B-1 Meter Box dHa: 2.043
1.034 Assuncd Moisture: 7.00
0.001 Leak lest Vac, in Hg: 10.00
EMISSIONS RESULTS
n) 100.0 10C.00Ckng
•g/dsca Concentration, ng/dscn: 57.843
gr/d$ef Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.025
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 3.236
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.468
Point
Nun
Sample
Tine
(nin)
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
(cu ft)
Delta P
(in H20)
Delta N
(in H201
Gas Meter
Te«c (oF>
Stack
Ten© (oF>
mg
mg/dsca
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
100.0 100.000mg
Concentration, cng/dscn: 57.843
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.025
Emission Rate.Lb/hr PMRc: 3.236
1
4
378.749
0.320
1.300
90.0
91.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc:
1.468
2
19
387.515
0.3C0
1.200
90.0
91.0
3
34
396.208
0.300
1.200
90.0
91.0
ng
100.0
IQO.OOQmg
4
49
404.875
0.300
1.200
92.0
91.0
mg/dsan
Concentration, ag/daan:
57.843
5
64
413.432
0.300
1.200
94.0
91.0
gr/dscm
Concentration, gr/dsoa:
0.025
6
79
422.098
0.300
1.200
96.0
91.0
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc:
3.236
7
94
430.793
0.310
1.300
96.0
91.0
Kj/hr
Eai6sion Rate,ICg/hr PMRc:
1.468
8
109
439.648
0.300
1.200
96.0
91.0
9
107/0FF
o
o
-J
FIHAl/AVG 107
*2.351
0.304
1.225
_2iJL
91.0
C-55
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Midpoint
Mo.: MID-NI-9D Date: 6/5/90
Operator: GCS
Net Run Tine: 105 ain
Ren Start Time: 1903
ISOKINETIC
DATA
Nm Sanpling Points: 7
Run Stop Time: 2048
Nozzle NLnber:
T 31
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.84C
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.600
Die
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.245
Pg Flue Cas Static Press, in H20:
-30.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Kg
27.394
VS
Flue Gas Velocity, rt/sec
32.7
Osd
Volouetric Air Flow Rate,
Dry SCFM:
14909.0
Moisture Data:
Qaw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate,
Wet ACFM:
17990.3
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
73.2
XI
Isokinetic Sanpling Rate,
X:
105.0
Vw(std) Voluae of Water Vapor, SCF:
3.446
D420 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
5.54
V®
Lb/hr
0.320
1
00
90.0
91.0
Kg/hr
0.300
1
00
90.0
91.0
0.300
1
00
90.0
91.0
rag
0.300
1
00
92.0
91.0
mg/dsan
0.300
1
00
94.0
91.0
gr/dscs
0.300
1
00
96.0
91.0
Lb/hr
0.300
1
00
96.0
91.0
Kg/hr
EMISSIONS RESULTS
100. 100.000ag
Concentration, mg/dsca:: 60.151
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.026
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 3.359
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PHRe: 1.523
100.0 100.000«8
Concentration, a^/dsca: 60.151
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.026
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRe: 3.359
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.523
100.0 tOO.OOOmg
Concentration, ng/dsea: 60.151
Concentration, gr/dson: 0.026
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PWc: 3.359
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.523
FIWAL/AVG 1C5
0.303
1-229
91.0
C-56
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Outlet
Run No.: OUT*
MMTL-9A
Operator:
Date: 6/5/90
MIH
Met Run Time: 118 min
Run Start Time: 1850
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nun Sd-Tpling Points: 6
Run Stop Tine: 2048
Nozzle Nueoer:
T-7
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot lube Coef.:
0.84C
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.600
Die
Nozzle Dianeter, in:
0.242
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in K20:
•0.320
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
29.576
VS
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
36.7
Qsd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Ory SCFM:
16320.3
Moisture Data:
Qaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFH:
20167.4
Vic Vol. liquid Collected, ml:
66.5
XI
isokinetic Sanpling Rate, X:
103.3
Vw(std) Voltme of Water Vapor, SCF:
3.130
Xh20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
4.32
Va(0 ry)
Volune Gas Metered, Ory:
73.322
XC02 Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
5.00
VnKStd)
VoIubo Cas Metered, Std:
69.368
X02 Percent 02 by Voline, Dry:
14.00
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction:
0.957
Fo Ortat Validation Value: 1.3d
Md Estimated Dry Hoi. Ut, lb/lb-Mole: 30.00
ms Uet Mol. Vt, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.48
Meter Box Nurfcer:
Dry G«s Hetar Cal. T:
Leak Test Rate, CFM:
FIELD
EN-2
0.985
0.008
DATA
Meter Box dHo:
Assumed Moisture:
Leak Test Vac, in Hg:
1.969
6.00
15.00
Point
Nun
Sample
Time
(min)
Ory Gas
Meter Reading
Delta H
fin H?0)
Cas Meter
Tew foM
Stack
Ten© (or)
1
0
914.518
0.360
1.270
80.0
145.0
2
15
923.650
0.380
1.340
84.0
149.0
3
30
933.100
0.350
1.240
85.0
157.0
4
45
942.200
0.370
1.310
85.0
160.0
5
60
951.500
0.360
1.270
87.0
160.0
6
75
960.660
0.370
1.310
88.0
162.0
7
90
969.950
0.380
1.340
88.0
161.0
8
105
979.450
0.380
1.340
87.0
163.0
9
118/OFF
987.840
10
••
••
-
--
11
--
--
--
-
-~
12
--
—
--
--
--
13
--
-•
--
--
--
14
--
--
--
--
--
15
-•
••
••
-
16
--
--
—
--
--
17
-•
• •
--
• •
18
••
--
-•
••
--
19
—
••
...
—
••
20
-•
--
-
••
--
21
••
••
-•
••
••
22
••
-
••
--
23
--
--
-•
24
-
-•
--
25
FIMAL/AVG
118
73.322
0.369
1.502
85.5
157.1
EMISSIONS RESULTS
mg 100.0 100.000mg
ag/dsc
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Sit© 9
Sampling Location: Outlet
Net Run Time: 117 in In
Urn Sampling Points: 8
Run No.: OUT-MMTL-9B Date: 6/5/90
Operator: HLH
Run Start lime: 1651
Run Stop Time: 2043
ISOKINETIC DATA
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg: 29.500
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20: -0.320
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg: 29.476
Moisture Data:
ViC Vol. Liquid Collected, ml: 69.1
Vw(std) Vol Line of Uater Vapor, SCF: 3.253
Xx20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.: 4.49
XC02 Percent C02 by Volune, Dry: 5.00
%02 Percent 02 by Volune, Dry: 14.00
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction: 0.955
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.36
Md Estimated Dry Mol. Vt, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms Wet Mol. wt, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.46
Noxile Nuitoer:
T-8
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.243
A
Stock/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
36.8
Osd
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
16269.5
Qa*
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM:
20208.5
X!
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
103.5
Vm(Dry)
Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
78.052
Vm(Std) Volume Gas Metered, Std:
69.245
Meter Box Nunber:
Ory Gas Meter Cal. Y:
leak Test Rate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
EW-1
0.932
0.007
Meter Box dHa: 1.969
Assured Moisture: 6.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 15.00
mg
mg/dscni
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
EMISSIONS RESULTS
100.0 lOC.OCOmg
Concentration, mg/dscm; 51.000
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.022
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 3.107
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.410
100.0
lOO.OOOmg
staple
Dry Gas
mg/dscm
Concentration, mg/dscm:
51.000
Point
Time
Meter Reading
Delta P
Delta K
Gas Meter
Stack
gr/dscf
Concentration, gr/dscf:
0.022
Nun
(min)
Ccu ft>
fin H20)
fin H20)
leno
(of?
Tero (oF)
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc:
3.107
1
0
179.538
0.360
1.770
81
0
145.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc:
1.410
2
15
189.230
0.380
1.340
85
0
149.0
3
30
199.360
0.350
1.240
87
0
157.0
rrg
100.0
100.000b«
4
45
209.120
0.370
1.310
88
0
160.0
mg/dscm
Concentration, mg/dscm:
51.000
5
60
219.110
0.360
1.270
91
0
160.0
er/dscm
Concentration, gr/dscm:
0.022
6
75
228.980
0.370
1.310
93
0
162.0
Lb/hr
Enission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc:
3.107
7
90
239.010
0.380
1.340
93
0
161.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc:
1.410
8
105
249.160
0.380
1.340
92
0
163.0
9
117/OFF
257.590
10
--
--
--
--
--
11
• •
--
-•
-•
--
12
-
--
-•
-
--
13
—
••
• •
-
••
14
••
--
• •
•-
-•
IS
--
• •
• •
••
16
--
-•
--
-
-•
17
-
-•
--
-
18
--
••
• •
--
-•
19
••
-•
••
••
20
--
--
• -
-
--
21
--
-•
•-
--
••
22
••
• •
--
• •
-
23
• •
• •
--
-
--
24
-•
--
--
--
•
-
--
25
..
--
—
•
.
..
FlHAl/AVG 117
78-05?
0-369
1.302
J^L
157.1
C-58
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Outlet
Net Run Tine: 116 min
Nub SanpMng Points: 8
Run No.: OUT-NI-9C Date: 6/5/90
Operator: RtM
Rin Start Time: 1850
Run Stop Time: 2046
ISOKINETIC DATA
Mczzlc Nurfcer:
T-7
Pressures:
CP
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.640
Pbar
Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.600
Oia
Nozzle Diaa*ter, in:
0.244
Pg
Flue Gas Static Press, in h20;
-0.320
A
Stack/Duct Area, ir£:
1319.5
Ps
Absolute Flue Cas Press, in Hg:
29.576
VS
Floe Cas Velocity, ft/sec:
36.6
Qsd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Ory SCFH: 16314.6
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate,
Wet ACFM: 20127.0
VIC
Vol. Liquid Collected, oil:
64.1
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,
X: 101.9
Vw(std)
Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
3.017
XH20
Moisture Content, % by Vol.:
4.16
Vm(Dry>
Volune Cas Metered, Dry:
74.417
XC02
Percent C02 by Volune, Ory:
5.00
Vm(Std) Volune Gas Metered, Std:
69.524
X02
Percent 02 by Volune, Ory:
14.00
Hid
Ory Mole Fraction:
0.958
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.38
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Md
Estimated Dry Mol. ut, Lb/Lb-Hole:
30.00
MS
Wet Mol. Ut, Ib/Lb-Molc:
29.50
mg
100.0
100.000mg
Meter Box Nurber:
Dry Ott Meter Cel. Y:
Leak Test Rate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
N-16
0.996
0.007
Neter Box dHa: 1.620
Assuned Moisture: 6.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 15.00
ng/dtctn
gr/dscf
lb/hr
Kg/hr
Sample
Dry Cas
¦g/dscm
Point
Tine
Meter Reading
Delta P
Delta H
Gas Meter
Stack
gr/dscf
Nun
(¦in}
(eu fn
fin H?0>
(in H?0)
Tero (oF)
Ten® (oF)
Lb/hr
1
C
555.283
0.360
1.160
78.0
145.0
Kg/hr
2
15
564.473
0.380
1.230
83.0
149.0
3
30
574.089
0.350
1.130
92.0
157.0
me
4
45
583.332
0.370
1.190
98.0
160.0
ng/dscm
5
60
593.257
0.360
1.160
104.0
160.0
gr/dscm
6
75
602.260
0.370
1.190
108.0
162.0
Lb/hr
7
90
611.906
0.360
1.230
110.0
161.0
Kg/hr
6
105
621.679
0.370
1.190
112.0
163.0
9
118/OFF
629.700
F1NM./AVG 118
74.417
0.367
Concentration, ag/dsan: 50.795
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.022
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 3.104
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.408
100.0 100.000ag
Concentration, mg/dscm: SO.795
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.022
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PHRc: 3.104
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PHRc: 1.40S
100.0 100.000otg
Concentration, ng/dscm: 50.795
Concentration, gr/dscm: 0.022
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 3.104
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.408
157.1
C-59
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Outlet
Net Run Tin*: 116 min
Nob Sampling Points: 8
Rut ko.i OUT-NI-9D Date; 6/5/90
Operator: RLM
Run Start Tiae: 1851
Run Stop Tiac: 2049
ISOKINETIC DATA
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in He:
Pg Flue Cos Static Press, in K2C:
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
Vw(std) Vol lire of Uater Vapor, SCF:
Xh20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
XCG2 Percent C02 by Volunc, Ory:
*02 Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
Mfd Dry Hole Fraction:
fo Orsat Validation value:
Md Estimated Dry MoI. Vt, Lb/Lb-Hole: 30.00
Ms Wet Hoi. Ut, lb/lb-Mol»: 29.51
29.600
•0.350
29.574
59.8
2.815
4.12
5.00
14.00
0.959
1.38
Nozzle Nurtxr:
1-8
Cp
P i tot Tube Cocf.:
0.840
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.239
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
vs
riue Gas Ve.ocity, Ft/sec;
36.6
Osd
Volumetric Air Flow Rate,
Dry SCFM:
16317.3
Oaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Wet ACFM:
20128.3
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Sate,
X:
100.0
Va(Dry) Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
71.909
VaKStd)
Volune Gas Metered, Std:
65.465
FIELD DATA
Heter Box timber:
Dry Gas Heter Cal. Y:
Leak Test Bate, CFH:
WU-7
0.969
0.009
Meter Box dHa: 1.820
Assisted Moisture: 6.00
Leak Test Vac, in Kg: 15.00
EMISSIONS RESULTS
mg 100.0 100.000*>g
mg/dsco Concentration, mg/dscn: 53.944
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.024
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 3.297
Kg/hr Emission Rata,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.495
mg
100.0 100.000a«
Sample
Dry Gas
mg/dscm
Concentration, mg/dscai: 53.944
Point
T ime
Meter Reading
Delta P
Delta H
Gas Meter
Stack
gr/dscf
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.024
Nun
fmin)
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location:
Run Mo.: IN~MMTL— 11A Date: 6/6/90
Operator: LI
Net Run Time: 90 min
Run Start Time: 1615
ISOKINETIC
DATA
Nun Saffpling Points: 6
Run Stop Tine: 1745
Nozzle Nurber:
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.800
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.375
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
0.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
14400.0
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
29.800
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec
27.9
Osd
Volumetric Air Flow Sate,
Dry SCFM:
36361.8
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate,
Uet ACFM:
1675 64.b
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
353.9
XI
isokinetic Sampling Rate,
X:
157.7
Vw(std) Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
16.658
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
29.62
Vm(Dry)
Volume Gas Metered, Dry:
42.388
%C02 Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
5.00
Vrr.(Std)
Volune Gas Metered, Std:
39.587
*02 Percent 02 by Volume, Dry:
14.00
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction:
0.704
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.38
Md Estinated Dry Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Hole: 30.00
Ms Wet Mol. Uc, Lb/Lb-Mole: 26.45
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Nurtxr: SAC-1
Dry Cis Meter Cal. t: 1.0CO
Leak Test Rate, CFM: 0.012
Meter Box dHa: 1.851
Assumed Moisture: 30.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 5.00
EMISSIONS RESULTS
¦g 100.0 100.000mg
wg/dsan Concentration, mg/dscra: 69.207
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.039
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 12.148
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PHRc: 5.510
mg
100.0
lOO.OOOog
Sanple
Dry Gas
mg/dscm
Concentration, mg/dsctn:
89.2C7
?oint
T iow
Meter Reading
Delta P
Delta H
Gas Meter
Stack
gr/dscf
Concentration, gr/dscf:
0.039
Hun
fnin)
(
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc
: 12.148
1
0
489.546
0.070
0.700
92.0
1272.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc
: 5.510
2
15
496.610
0.070
0.700
96.0
1260.0
3
30
503.720
0.070
0.700
102.0
1228.0
100.0
lOC.OOOrag
4
45
510.713
0.060
0.700
107.0
1237.0
mg/dsan
Concentration, mg/dscm:
89.207
5
60
517.630
0.070
0.700
112.0
1260.0
gr/dscm
Concentration, gr/dsca:
0.039
6
75
524.814
o.oao
0.700
114.0
1217.0
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc
: 12.148
7
90/OFF
531.934
FIMAL/AVC 90
42.3M
0.070
0.700
103.8
1245.7
C-61
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TADULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Inlet
Run No.: IN-MMTL-11B Date: 6/6/90
Operator: LT
Net Run Time: 90 min
Run Start T ine: 1615
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nua Sampling Points: 6
Run Stop Time: 1745
Nozzle Nu-ber:
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tuoe Cocf.:
0.840
Pber Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.800
Dia
Nozzle Oianeter, in:
0.375
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
0.000
A
Stuck/Doct Area, in2:
14400.0
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg
: 29.800
VS
flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec;
26.2
Osd
Voluaetrie Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
J7C40.5
Moisture Data:
Qaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM:
169247.0
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
360.6
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
162.2
Vw(std) Vol tint of Water Vapor, SCF:
16.973
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
29.04
Vm(Dry) Voluae Gas Metered, Dry:
44.482
XC02 Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
5.00
Vm(Std)
Voluae Cas Metered, Std:
41.482
X02 Percent C2 by Volune, Dry:
14.00
Hfd Dry Mole Fraction:
0.710
fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.38
Nd Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Ib/lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms Uet Hoi. Ut, lb/lb-Nole: 26.52
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Nurrtoer: RAC 5
Dry Gas Meter Cal. T: 1.000
Leak Test Rate, CFM: 0.013
Sample Dry Gas
Meter Box dRa:
Attuned Moisture:
Leak Test Vac, in
1.869
30.00
Hg: 4.00
Point
Tine
Meter Reading
Delta P
Delta H
Gas Meter
Stack
Num
(min)
(cu ft)
(in H20)
(in «2cn
Tenc (oF)
TWO (OF)
1
0
641.760
0.070
0.700
97.0
1260.0
2
15
649.750
0.070
0.700
98.0
1216.0
3
30
657.100
0.080
0.700
102.0
1258.0
4
45
664.400
0.060
0.700
106.0
1240.0
5
60
671.920
0.070
0.700
110.0
1247.0
6
75
679.400
0.083
0.700
115.0
1250.0
7
6
90/OFF
686.242
„ _
. _
..
9
10
..
. .
11
-
-•
••
-•
--
--
EMISSIONS RESULTS
ng 100.0 lOO.OOQmg
ng/dscm Concentration, ag/dsan: 85.133
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.037
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 11.810
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 5.357
mg 100. lOO.OOOoig
ng/dscm Concentration, mg/dscm: 55.133
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.037
lb/hr Emission Rat«,lb/hr PMfic: 11.810
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 5.357
mg 100.0 100.000mg
mg/dsc* Concentration, mg/dscm: 65.133
gr/dscB Concentration, gr/dscsi: 0.037
lb/hr Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 11.610
FINAl/AVG 90
44.482
0.071
0.700
104.7
124S.2
C-62
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Inlet
Met Run Tine: 90 min
Hun Sampting Points: 6
Ron No.: IN—NI—11C Date: 6/6/90
Operator: IT
Run Start Time: 1616
Run Stop Tin*; 1616
ISOKINETIC DATA
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg: 29.800
Ps Hue Gas Static Press, in K2C: 0.000
Ps Absolute Flue Cas Press, in Hg: 29.800
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. liquid Collected, ml: 311.9
VwUtd) Volune of Uater Vapor, SCF: 14.681
1H20
Moisture Content, 1 by Vol.:
26.57
XCOZ
Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
5.00
X02
Percent 02 by Volune, Ory:
14.00
Mfd
Ory Mole Fraction:
0.734
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.38
Md
Estimated Dry Mol. Wt, Lb/Lb-Mole:
30.00
Ms
Vet Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
26.81
Nozzle Nuaber:
CP
Pitot lube Coef.:
0.840
Die
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.375
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
14400.C
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec
28.7
Osd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Dry SCFM:
39D0C.B
Qaw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate,
Wet ACfM:
172346.
XI
Isokinetic Sanpling Rate,
X:
150.7
Vm(Ory) Voiune Gas Metered, Dry:
43.588
Vm(Std)
Volume Gas Metered, Std:
40.564
Meter Box Nirfeer:
Ory Gas Meter Cal. Y:
Leak Test Rate, CfM:
FIELD
RAC-2
1.000
0.011
DATA
Meter Box dHa: 1.856
Assured Moisture: 30.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 6.00
Sample
Dry Gas
Point
Time
Meter Reading
Oelta P
Nun
fmin)
(cu ft)
(in H20)
1
0
436.325
0.070
2
15
443.765
0.080
3
30
450.831
0.080
4
45
458.210
0.070
5
60
465.413
0.070
6
75
473.100
0.080
7
90/OFF
479.913
8
-•
9
-
••
••
10
--
--
11
• •
--
12
--
••
13
-•
--
14
••
••
15
-•
-
16
--
--
17
--
-•
1B
--
-•
19
-•
--
20
-•
••
21
-*
-¦
22
-•
-•
23
--
-•
24
--
25
-•
--
--
Delta H
(In H?Q)
Gas Meter
Tf»D (of)
0.700
0.700
0.7DC
0.700
0.70C
0.70C
97.0
99.0
106.0
107.0
111.0
115.0
Stack
Temp (oF)
1280.0
1202.0
1226.0
1248.0
1272.0
1250.0
EMISSIONS RESULTS
•9 100.0 100.000n«
mg/dscn Concentration, mg/dscm; 87.059
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscfi 0.038
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PHRc: 12.716
Kg/hr Emission Rate.Kg/hr PMRc: 5.766
tng 1C0.0 100.000mg
nc/dscm Concentration, mg/dsan: 87.059
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.038
Lb/hr EaUsion Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 12.716
Kj/hr Eaission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 5.768
ms 100.0 lOO.OOOmg
mg/dscm Concentration, ag/dsca: 87.059
gr/dscs Concentration, gr/dsca: 0.038
Lb/hr Emission Rate.Lb/hr pMRc: 12.716
flHAL/AVC 90
43.586
0.075
0.700
105.8
1246.3
C-63
-------
ISOKINETIC 8AMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
»lant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Inlet
Net Run Iime: 90 nin
Nub Sampling Points: 6
Run He.: IN-NI-11D Date: 6/6/90
Operator: it
Run Start Time: 1616
Run Stop T ime: 1816
ISOKINETIC DATA
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
Pg Flue Cas Static Press, in H20:
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
Moisture Data:
29.600
0.000
29.800
vie
Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
333.1
Vw(std)
Volune of Uatcr Vapor, SCf:
15.679
uzo
Moisture Content, % by Vol.:
29.57
XC02
Percent CC2 by Volune, Dry:
5.00
X02
Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
14.00
Mfd
Dry Mole Fraction:
0.704
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.38
Md
Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
30.00
KS
Vet Mol. Wt, Lb/Lb-Mole:
26.4S
Mozzle Muroer:
Cp
Pi tot Tube Coef.:
Q.84C
Oia
kozzle Diameter, in:
0.375
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
14400.0
Vs
flue Cas Velocity, Ft/sec
2d.4
Qsd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Dry SCFK: 36629.8
Oaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Uet ACFM: 170269.4
XI
Isokinetic Sanpling Rate,
X: 147.7
Vm(Dry)
Volune Cas Metered, Dry:
40.164
Vm(Std)
Volune Gas Metered, Std:
37.345
Meter Box Nivrber;
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y:
Leak Test Rate, CFH:
FIELD DATA
RAC 3
1.000
0.009
Meter Box dfia: 1.849
Assuaed Moisture: 30.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 6.00
EMISSIONS RESULTS
mg 100.0 100.000mg
ng/dscm Concentration, mg/dsetn: 94.564
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.041
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 12.973
ICg/hr Emission Rate,ICg/hr PMRc: 5.884
Point
Nun
Sample
Time
(min^
Dry Ga6
Meter Reoding
Delta N
(in H20}
Gas Meter
Tetro (oF>
Stack
Tero foF}
mg
ng/dscm
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
100.C lOO.OOOmg
Concentration, mg/dscm: 94.564
Concentratlor, gr/dscf: 0.041
Emission RateAb/hr PHRc: 12.973
1
0
138.853
0.070
0.700
96.0
1268.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMfte:
5.884
2
15
145.290
0.060
0.700
98.0
1298.0
3
30
152.160
0.080
0.700
107.0
1250.0
mg
1OC.0
lOO.OOOmg
4
45
159.082
0.070
0.700
108.0
1230.0
mg/dsc*
Concentration, mg/dsan:
94.564
S
60
165.678
0.070
0.700
113.0
1269.0
gr/dscm
Concentration, gr/dsca:
0.041
6
75
172.614
0.080
0.700
116.0
1235.0
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc:
: 12.973
7
90/OFF
179.017
F1HAL/AVC 90 40.164 0.071 0.700 106.3 1261.7
C-64
-------
ISOKINETIC
SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND
RESULTS TABULATION
Plant:
Site 9 Run kio.
MID-MMTL-11A
Date: 6/6/90
Sarrpling Location: MIDPOINT
Operator:
CC8
Net Run
Time: 105 min
Run Start Tine: 1554
ISOKINETIC DATA
Kur Sampling Points: 7
Rixi
Stop Time: 1739
Nozzle Number:
127
Pressures:
CP
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.640
Pb (oF)
Ten*) foF)
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc:
0.000
1
0
433.605
0.360
1.460
96.0
94.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PNRc:
0.000
2
5
442.989
0.360
1.500
96.0
94.0
3
30
452.568
0.360
1.500
96.0
94.0
19
0.009 mc
4
45
462.192
0.360
1.500
98.0
92.0
mg/dscn
Concentration, ng/dscn:
0.000
5
60
471.697
0.360
1.500
98.0
92.0
gr/dscot
Concentration, gr/dscnt:
0.000
6
75
481.242
0.360
1.500
96.0
92.0
Lb/hr
emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRe:
0.000
7
90
490.744
0.360
1.500
100.0
92.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc:
0.000
6
105/3FF
500.252
FIH^L/AVG 105
66.647
0.360
1.494
97.4
92.9
C-65
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sacrpling Location: Midpoint
wet Run Time: 105 mln
Nut Sailing Points: 7
Run No.: MID—MMTL—11B Date: 6/6/90
Operator: GCB
Run Start Tine: 1556
Run Stop T ime: 1741
Pressures:
Ptwr Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in K20:
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in H3:
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ®l:
Vw(std) Volune of Water Vapor, SCf:
Kh20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
XC02 Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
*02 Percent 02 by Volune, Ory:
Hfd Dry Hole Fraction:
Fo Orsat Validation Value:
Md Estimated Dry Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms wet Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.25
29.550
•30.000
27.344
92.7
4.363
6.26
5.00
U.00
0.937
1.3«
ISOKINETIC DATA
No2zle Nunber:
T26
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef
0.840
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.245
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
35.fi
Qsd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFH:
16110.8
Qaw
Volumetric Air Flow Sate, Uet ACFM:
19700.3
XI
isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
108.2
Vm(Ory) Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
68.016
VmCStd)
Volune Gas Metered, Std:
65.392
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Nimber: A-2
Dry Cat Meter Cel. Y: 1.024
Leak Test Rate, CFH: 0.001
Sample Ory Cas
Point Time Meter Reading
Nun (mln) 9
100.CO 100.000ns
nfi/dscm
Concentration, ®g/dscm:
54.005
Delta P
Delta M
Gas Meter
Stack
gr/dscf
Concentration, gr/dscf:
0.024
(in H20)
(in K2C)
len©
Tee© (oF)
Lb/hr
Eatssion Rate, Lb/hr PMRc:
3.258
0.360
1.503
96.0
94.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc:
1.478
0.360
1.500
96.0
94.0
0.360
1.50D
96.0
94.0
mg
100.00
100.000ng
0.360
1.500
98.0
94.0
vig/dscm
Concentration, mg/dscirc:
54.005
0.360
1.500
98.0
92.0
gr/dscm
Concentration, gr/dscrc:
0.024
0.360
1.500
96.0
92.0
Lb/hr
Emission Rote,lb/hr PMRc:
3.256
0.360
1.500
100. C
92.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc:
1.478
F1MAL/AVG ICS
68.016
0-360
1-S00
97.4
.21J.
C-66
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Midpoint
Net Run Time; 105 min
Nun Sampling Points: 7
Run No.: MID-NI-11C Date: 6/6/90
Operator: GCB
Run Start Time: 1558
Run Stop Time: 1743
ISOKINETIC DATA
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in K20:
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. liquid Collected, ml:
Vw(std) Volune of Vater Vapor, SCF:
29.550
•30.000
27.344
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
XC02 Percent CC2 by Volune, Dry:
X02 Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction:
Fo Oraat Validation Value:
Md Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Hole: 30.00
Ms Wet Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.23
91.5
4.307
6.44
5.00
14.00
0.936
1.38
Nozzle Nuitwr:
T30
CP
Pi tot Tube Coef.:
O.S40
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.245
A
Stack/Duct Arcs, in2:
1319.5
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
35.5
Qsd
Volumetric Air Flow Rate,
Dry SCFM:
16088.9
Qaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Uet ACFM:
'.9702.8
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,
X:
103.6
Vm(Dry)
Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
66.631
Vm(Std)
Volune Gas Metered, Std:
62.54C
Meter Box Nurber:
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y:
Leak Test Rate, CFK:
FIELD DATA
B-1
1.0C0
0.0C1
Meter 6ox dha: 2.043
Assuned Moisture: 7.C0
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 9.00
EMISSIONS RESULTS
mg 100.00 100.000ms
mg/dscm Concentration, ag/dscn: 56.467
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.025
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 3.402
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.543
Point
Nun
Swrple
Time
(min)
Ory Gas
Meter Reading
(cu ft)
Delta P
(in H2t»
Delta K
(in H20)
Gas Meter
Tewo (Of>
Stack
Ten© MRc:
1.543
2
19
519.738
0.360
1.500
96.0
94.0
3
34
529.234
0.360
1.500
94.0
94.0
mg
100.00
100.000mg
4
49
538.702
0^360
1.500
98.0
92.0
mg/dsca
Concentration, mg/dsan:
56.467
5
64
548.218
0.360
1.50C
98.0
92.0
gr/dsca
Concentration, gr/dscm:
0.025
6
79
557.687
0.360
1.500
98.0
92.0
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc:
3.402
7
94
567.367
0.360
1.50C
100.0
92.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc
1.543
8
105/OFf
576.942
final/avg 105
66.631
0.360
1.500
97.4
92.9
C-67
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Hid point
Net Run Tim: 105 rain
Mm Sampling Points: 7
Rjn Ho.: MID-NI-11D Oate: 6/6/90
Operator: CCB
Run Start Time: 1600
Run Stop Time: 1745
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nczzle Nirfcer:
131
Pressures:
Cp
P i tot Tube Cocf.:
0.840
Poar
Baroatetric Pressure, in Hg:
29.550
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.245
Pfl
Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
-30.000
A
Stock/Ouct Area. in2:
1319.5
Ps
Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
27.344
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/s>ec:
35.8
Qsd
Voluaetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFH:
16105.8
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Vet ACFH:
19697.9
vie
Vol. Liquid Collected, Ml:
91.5
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
105.6
Vw(std)
Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
4.307
XH20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
6.32
Vm(Dry)
Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
60.137
XC02
Percent C02 by Volume, Ory:
5.00
Vm(Std)
Volume Gas Metered, Std:
63.823
XCZ
Percent 02 by Volune, Ory:
14.00
Mfd
Ory Mole Fraction:
0.937
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.38
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Kd
Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Ib/Lb-Mole:
30.00
Mi
Wet Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Hole:
29.24
mg
100.00 100.000ag
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Nuitoer; B*2
Dry Gas Meter Cel. Y: 1.131
Leak Test Rate, CFM: 0.001
Sanple Cry Gas
Point Tine Meter Reading
Nin (win) (cu ft)
Meter Box due: 2.125
Assumed Moisture: 7.00
Leak lest Vac, in Hg: 8.00
Delta f
H20>
Delta K
(in H2Q3
Gas Meter
(on
6
21
56
51
66
81
96
105/OFF
849.354
857.901
866.SU
875.138
883.746
892.24?
900.644
909.491
0.360
0.360
0.360
0.360
0.360
0.360
0.360
1.500
1.500
1.500
1.500
1.500
1.500
1.500
96.0
96.0
96.0
98.0
98.0
98.0
100.0
Stack
lenp (oF)
94.0
94,0
94.0
92.0
92.0
92.0
92.0
F1NAL/AVG 1C5
60-137
0.360
1.500
97.4
mg/dscm Concentration, tng/dsctn: 55.333
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.024
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PHRc: 3.338
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PHRc: 1.514
cog 100.00 lOO.OOOmg
mg/dscm Concentration, mg/dscm; 55.333
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.024
Lb/hr Emission Rate,Lb/hr PHRc: 3.338
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PHRc: 1.514
ng 100.00 100.0C0mg
mg/dscrc Concentration, mg/dscm: 55.333
gr/dscm Concentration, gr/dscm: 0.024
Lb/hr Emission Rate,Lb/hr PHftc: 3.338
Kg/hr Eaission Rate,Kg/hr PHRc: 1.514
92.9
C-68
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling location: Outlet
Net Run Time: 120 min
Nun Sartvling Points: 8
Run No.: OUT-MMTL-11A Dote: 6/6/90
Operator: NLH
Rur. Start T ime: 1545
Run Stop Tim.*: 1745
ISOKINETIC DATA
hozzle Number:
T-7
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tube Cocf.:
0.840
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in «S-
29.800
Dia
Nonle Diameter, in:
0.242
Py Flue Cas Static Press, in H20:
-0.370
A
Slack/Duct Area, in?:
1319.5
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in hg:
29.773
VS
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
3B.4
Osd
Volumetric Air Flo* Rate, Dry SCFM:
17353.5
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM;
21114.5
Vic Vol. Licuiti Collected, ml:
85.2
SI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
103.9
Vw(std) Volune of Water Vapor, SCF; 4.010
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.: 5.05
XCC2 Percent C02 by VoliAe, Dry: 5.00
XO2 Percent 02 by Voluw, Dry: 14.00
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction; 0.950
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.38
HC Estimated Ory Mol. Yt, lb/tb-Mole: 30.00
Ms Wet Mol. Vt. Ib/Lb-Mole: 29.39
Meter Box Nimber:
Dry Gas Meter Cal. T:
Leak Test Rate. CFM:
FIELD DATA
EN 2 Meter Box dHa; 2.00;
0.985 Assured Moisture: 6.00
0.006 Leak Test Vac, in Kg: 5.00
V»(Dry> Volume Gas Metered, Dry:
Va(Std) Volune Cas Metered, Std:
EMISSIONS RESULTS
79.341
75.429
ng
ng/dscra
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
Point
Nun
Sample
T ime
(nin)
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
(cu ft)
Delta P
fin H20)
Delta H
(in H20)
Cas Meter
Teno foF)
Stack
Temo (oF)
m®
mg/dscm
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
1
0
49.523
0.400
1
440
77.0
KC.O
Kg/hr
2
15
59.250
C.430
1
50
83.0
14C.0
3
30
69.320
C.410
1
480
85.0
146.0
*9
4
45
79.220
0.390
1
10
87.0
150.0
mg/dscn
5
60
88.940
0.420
1
20
87.0
149.0
gr/dsca
6
75
99.000
0.410
1
80
90.0
150.0
Lb/hr
7
9C
108.950
0.440
1
90
92.0
149.0
Kg/hr
8
1C5
119.230
0.400
1
40
93.0
152.0
9
120/OFF
128.864
10
--
-~
••
• •
11
-•
-•
-•
--
12
-
-•
--
-•
13
--
--
-•
14
-
--
--
15
-•
• •
• •
16
--
--
17
••
••
--
18
• •
--
19
-•
••
--
--
20
--
21
••
••
• •
22
--
--
23
--
--
--
--
24
--
--
-•
• •
25
..
--
100. 100.000mg
Concentration, mg/dscm: 46.818
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.020
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 3.043
Emission Rate,K$/hr PMRc: 1.360
100.0 lOO.OOOrag
Concentration, mg/dsctn: 46.818
Concent rat ion, gr/dscf: 0.020
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 3.043
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.380
100.0 ICO.OOOng
Concentration, mg/dscn: 46.818
Concentration, gr/dsc«: 0.020
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 3.043
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.380
FINAL/AVG 120
79.341
0.412
1.489
MJ,
147.0
C-69
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Piant: Site 9
Sailing Location: outlet
Net Run 1ine: 120 min
kj-i Sampling Points: 6
Run fco.: OUT-MHTL-11B Date: 6/6/90
Operator: hlh
Run Start Time: 1546
Run Stop Time: 1746
ISOKINETIC DATA
Pressures:
Pl>ar Baronetric Pressure, in Hg:
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H2C:
Ps Absolute Flue Gos Press, in Hs:
Moisture Data:
79.800
•0.370
29.773
V(C
Vol. Liquid Collected, «t;
85.1
Vw(std)
Volume of Water Vapor, SCF:
4.006
XM20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
4.96
XCC2
Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
5.00
X02
Percent C2 by Voli/ne, Dry:
14.00
Dry Hole Fraction:
0.950
Fo
Or&at Validation Value:
1.38
Md
Estimated Dry Mo;. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
30.00
Ms
Uet Hot. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
29.40
>«o?rle Nusbcr;
T-8
Cp
Pi tot lube Coef.:
0.840
Di.i
Wozrle Dianeter, in:
0.243
A
Stdck/Ouct Area, in2:
1319.5
vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec
38.4
Qsd
Volunetric Air flow Rate,
Ory SCFM:
17366.C
Oaw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate,
Uet ACFM:
21110.9
XI
Isokinetic Sailing Rate,
X:
104.7
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Nusber: EH-1
Dry Ges Meter Cal. Y: 0.932
leak Test Rate, CFM; 0.009
Meter Box dHa: 1.969
Assuned Moisture: 6.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 5.00
Sample Dry Gas
Vm(Dry) Volute Cos Metered, Dry:
Vffi(Std) vol Line Gas Metered, Std:
EMISSIONS RESULTS
85.170
76.692
rng
mg/dscm
Or/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
B>9/cJscm
Point
Time
Meter Reading
Delta P
Delta H
Gas Meter
Stack
gr/dscf
Hub
(min)
(cv ft)
fin K20)
(in H?01
Temp (oF}
Ten© (oF}
Lb/hr
1
0
322.395
0.400
1.440
77.0
140
0
Kg/hr
2
15
332.930
0.430
1.550
81.0
140
0
3
3C
343.730
0.410
1*430
85.0
146
0
"3
4
45
354.300
0.390
1.410
66.0
150
0
ng/dsan
5
60
364.640
0.420
1.520
87.0
149
c
gr/dsca
6
75
375.300
0.410
1.480
90.0
15
c
Lb/hr
7
90
385.980
0.440
1.590
92.0
14
0
Kg/hr
8
105
396.980
0.400
1.440
93.0
15
c
9
120/OFF
407.565
10
-
--
--
••
11
--
••
••
••
•
12
--
--
13
--
--
-•
--
-
14
--
-•
••
••
•
15
--
16
--
••
«•
••
•
17
--
••
-•
18
••
-¦
••
••
-
19
--
-•
-•
-
20
•-
-•
-•
--
-
21
••
--
-•
--
-
22
-
-•
••
-
23
--
-•
-•
--
-
24
--
-•
-•
--
-
25
--
--
• •
--
-
100. 100.000rag
Concentration, mg/dsc«: 46.047
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.020
Emission Rate,lb/hr PHRc: 2.995
Emission Rate,K§/hr PMRc: 1.3S8
100. 100.000-ns
Concentration, mg/ducm: 46.047
Concentration, sr/dscf: 0.020
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 2.99S
Emission Rate.Kg/hr PMRc: 1.358
100. IOO.OOO09
Concentration, ag/dscm: 46.047
Concert rat ion, jr/dsctn: 0.020
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PHRc: 2.995
Emission Rote,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.358
F1MAL/AVS 120
85.170
0.412
1.489
86.4
147.0
C-70
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AMD RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sailing Location: Outlet
Net Run Time: 120 oin
Nub SoupI ins Points: 8
Run No.: OUT-NI-11C Date: 6/6/90
Operator: BlH
Run Start I ine: 1545
Run Stop Time: 1745
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
Pg Flue Cas Static Press, in H20:
Ps Absolute Hue Gas Press, m H9:
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
Vw(std) Vol one of Uater Vapor, SCf:
%k2C Koisture Content, X by Vol.:
XC02 Percent C02 by Voluae, Dry:
>02 Percent 02 by Volur*, Dry:
Hfd Dry Mole fraction:
Fo Orsat validation Value:
Md Estimated Dry MoI. Ut, Lb/Lb-Hole: 30.00
Ms Uet Hoi. ut, Ib/lb-Hole: 29.44
29.803
-0.370
29.773
78.8
3.709
4.66
5.0C
U.00
0.953
1.38
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle Nurbor:
7-5
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Dia
Nozzle Diaoeter, in:
0.244
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Vs
Flue Cas Velocity, Ft/sec:
38.4
Osd
Voluaetric Air Flow Kate, Dry SCFM:
17410.3
Qaw
Volunctric Air Flow Rate, Uct ACFM:
21097.9
XI
isokinetic Saapling Rate, X:
102.4
Vm(Ory)
Volune Cas Metered, Dry:
81.037
Vm(Std)
Volunc Cas Metered, Sta:
75.840
Meter Box Nuifcer:
Ory Gas Meter Cal. Y;
Leak Test Rate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
M-16
0.996
0.007
Point
Hun
Sample
T ime
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
Delta P
Meter Box dHa: 1.820
Assuaed Moisture: 6.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: S.OO
Delta H Cas Meter Stack
¦9
¦g/dsca
gr/dscf
lb/hr
Kg/hr
mg
mg/dscm
gr/dscf
(«in)
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AMD RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9 Run No.
: OUT
-NI-11
D Date:
6/6/90
Sampling Location: outlet
Operator: RLM
Met Run Time: 120 rain
Run
Start Time:
1546
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nt«n Sanplirtg Points: 8
Run
Stop Tii
me:
1746
Nozzle Mumber: 1-5
Pressures:
Cp
Pilot Tube Coef.: 0.840
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Kg:
29.800
Dia
Noizle Oiameter, in: 0.239
Pg flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
•0.370
A
Stack/Duct Area, ii\2: 1319.5
Ps Absolute flue Gas Press, in Hg
29.773
vs
osd
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec: 38.4
Voluactric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM: 17353.6
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM: 21119.4
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
80.0
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X: 103.8
VwUtd) Volme of Water Vapor, SCF:
3.766
Xh20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
5.01
Vfn(Dry)
Volune Gas Metered, Dry: 78.768
%C02 Fercent C02 by Volune, Cry:
5.00
Vin(Std)
Volume Gas Metered, Std: 71.394
XC2 Percent 02 by Volume, Dry:
14.00
Mfd Ory Mole Fraction:
0.950
Fo Orsat Validation Value:
i.sa
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Nd Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
30.00
Hs Vet Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Hole:
29.40
eg
100.0 lOO.OOOmg
•g/dsca Concentration, mg/dswu 49.465
FIELD
DATA
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.022
Meter Box Nmber: NU 7
Meter
Box
dHa:
1.820
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 3.215
Dry Gas Meter Cal. T: 0.961
Assumed Moisture:
6.00
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.458
Leak Test Rate, CFH: 0.0CS
leak Test
Vac, in
Kg: 5.00
n9
100.0 100.000®g
Sample
Dry Gas
ag/dscn
Concentration, mg/dsco: 49.465
Point
Time
Meter Reading
Delta P
Delta H
Gas Meter
Stack
gr/dscf
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.022
Man
(min)
(cu ft)
(in H2o>
tin H20>
Te«> (oF)
Tefro (on
lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 3.215
1
0
292.567
0.400
1.310
82.0
140.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.458
2
15
302.182
0.430
1.410
88.0
140.0
3
30
312.194
0.410
1.350
96.0
147.0
"9
100. lOO.OOOmg
4
45
322.035
0.390
1.260
100.0
151.0
og/dscm
Concentration, mg/cscm: 49.465
5
60
331.555
0.420
1.360
104.0
149.0
gr/dscm
Concentration, gr/dscm: 0.022
6
75
341.462
0.410
1.320
106.0
150.0
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 3.21S
7
90
351.275
0.440
1.420
108.0
150.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.458
8
105
36'.464
0.400
1.290
110.0
152.0
9
120/OF?
371.335
10
11
;;
•*
*•
*•
•*
12
--
--
..
• •
••
••
13
-•
--
--
-•
14
-
-•
•-
—
••
15
-•
••
••
--
16
••
--
-•
--
-•
17
~~
--
--
••
--
-•
18
--
--
-•
19
--
• •
• •
-
• •
20
••
-•
21
••
-
-•
••
--
-•
22
• •
--
-•
-•
—
--
23
-•
~-
-•
••
• •
-~
24
—
••
••
••
• •
25
*-
••
••
*•
FlMAL/AVG
120
78.768
0.412
1.340
99.2
147.4
C-72
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULT8 TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling location: INlet
Met Rixi Tine: 120 mio
Nan Soapling Points: 8
Ri*i Ho.: IN—MMTL-12A Date: 6/7/90
Operator: IT
Run Start Time: 1001
Run Stop Time: 1201
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Kg:
Pg Flue Cas Static Press, in K20:
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
Vw(ttd) Vol me of Water Vapor, SCF:
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
XC02 Percent CO? by Volune, Dry:
%c2 Percent 02 by Voluae, Dry;
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction:
Fo Orsat Validation Value;
Md Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms Ue: Mol. Ut, Lb/lb'Mole: 26.55
29.800
0.000
29.800
450.0
21.161
28.71
5.00
14.00
0.713
1.38
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle Nurber:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Dia
Nozzle Dianeter, in:
0.375
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
14400.0
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
26.4
Qsd
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
33619.3
Qaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFM:
158430.4
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
169.9
Vm(Ory)
Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
56.785
Vvi(Std)
Volune Cas Metered, Std:
52.586
Meter Box Niaber:
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y:
Leak Test Rate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
RAC-1
1.000
0.013
Meter Box dNa: 1.851
Assented Moisture: 30.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 6.00
Point
Sample
T iae
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
Oelta K Gas Meter
Stack
¦3
ng/dsDti
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
ng
ag/dscn
gr/dscf
Nun
(mini
(cu ft)
fin H20>
(in K20)
Ten© (oF)
Ten© (oF>
Lb/hr
1
0
554.245
0.070
0.700
97.0
1168.0
JCg/hr
2
15
561.356
0.070
0.700
101.0
1345.0
3
30
568.550
0.060
0.700
104.0
1309.0
mg
4
45
575.610
0.050
0.730
106.0
1322.0
mg/dscm
5
60
582.652
0.050
0.700
112.0
1344.0
gr/dsca
6
75
589.580
0.040
0.700
115.0
1342.0
Lb/hr
7
90
597.000
0.080
0.700
116.0
1311.0
Kg/hr
8
105
604.100
0.070
0.700
118.0
1312.0
9
120/OfF
611.030
EMISSIONS RESULTS
100 100.000ff«
Concentration, mg/d&aa: 67.156
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.029
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 8.455
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 3.835
100 100.00Ckng
Concentration, ng/dscn: 67.156
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.029
£ntssion Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 8.455
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 3.835
100 100.000ag
Concentration, ng/dsac: 67.156
Concentration, gr/dscti: 0.029
Eaission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 8.455
Emission Kate,Kg/hr PMRc: 3.835
f:nal/avc 120
56.785
0.061
0.700
108.6
1306.6
C-73
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Samplirtg Location: Inlet
Run No.: IN-MMTL-12B Date: 6/7/90
Operator: LT
Net Run Time: 120 mfn
Run
Start Time: 1001
ISOKINETIC DATA
N^rn Sanplirtg Points: 8
Run
Stop Time: 1201
Nozzle Nurtoer:
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coof.:
0.840
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.800
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.375
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
O.COO
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
14400.0
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
29.800
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
28.1
csd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
36116.0
Moisture Data:
Qaw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFM:
168769.5
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
45C.0
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
166.7
Vw(std) Voluae of yater Vapor, SCF:
21.181
XK20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
27.66
Vn(Ory)
Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
59.890
XC02 Percent C02 by Volunc, Dry:
5.00
Vm(Std)
Volune Gas Metered, Std:
55.401
X02 Percent 02 by Voli**, Dry:
14.00
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction:
0.723
Po Orsat Validation Value: 1.38
Hd Estimated Dry Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Hole: 30.00
Ms Wet Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Hole: 26.68
Meter Box Murber:
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y:
Leek Test Rate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
RAC 5 Meter 8cx dHa: 1.869
1.000 Assured Moisture: 30.00
0.014 Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 5.00
Point
Sanple
T ime
Ory Gas
Meter Reading
Delta P
Delta H Cos Meter
Stack
ng
ing/dscn
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
tig
ng/dscn
gr/dscf
Hirr
(mini
(cu ft)
(in H20)
(in H20)
Tec©
Lb/hr
1
0
701.637
0.070
0.700
98.0
1165.0
Kg/hr
2
15
709.573
0.070
0.700
102.0
1340.0
3
30
716.700
0.060
0.70C
106.0
1300.0
«g
4
45
724.250
0.070
0.700
108.0
1322.0
ng/dscn
5
60
732.100
0.070
0.700
112.0
1343.0
gr/dscai
6
75
739.150
0.060
0.700
114.0
1352.0
Lb/hr
7
90
746.532
0.070
0.700
116.0
1360.0
Kg/hr
8
105
754.100
0.080
0.700
118.0
1360.0
9
120/OFF
761.527
EMIS8ION8 RESULTS
100 lOC.OOOmg
Concent ration, mg/ctecm: 63.744
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.026
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 8.622
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 3.911
100 lOO.OOOrag
Concentration, ng/dsco: 63.744
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.028
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMlc: 8.622
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 3.911
100 100.000mg
Concentration, ng/dsco: 63.744
Concentration, gr/dsan: 0.028
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 8.622
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 3.911
F1WAI/AVG 120
59.890
0.069
0.70Q
109.2
1317.7
C-74
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9 Run Mo.
IN-NI-12C Cate: 6/7/90
Sanpling Location: Inlet
Operator: LT
Met Run T ime: 120 min
Run
Start Time: 1001
ISOKINETIC DATA
nut Sampling Points: 8
Run
Stop Tine: 1201
Ko2zle Nurber:
Pressures:
CP
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.84C
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.800
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.375
PS Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
0.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
14400.0
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
29.800
Vs
Flue Cos Velocity, Ft/sec:
27.2
Qsd
Volunetric Air flow Rate, Dry SCfM:
33889.3
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Volunctric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFH:
163301.3
vie Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
465.9
XI
Isokinetic Stapling Rate, X:
166.0
Vw(std) Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
21.930
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
29.75
VnKDry)
Volwe Gas Metered, Dry:
56.382
XC02 Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
5.00
Vm(Std)
Voluae Gas Metered, Std:
51.792
X02 Percent 02 by Voluae, Dry:
14.00
Mfd Dry Hole Fraction:
0.703
Fc Orsat Validation Value: 1.36 EMISSIONS RESULTS
Hd Estimated Dry Kol, Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 50.00
MS Uet
Mot. W*
, Lb/Lb-Mole:
26.43
tDQ
100 100.000«g
mg/dscm
Concentration, ng/dsca: 68.186
FIELD DATA
gr/dscf
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.030
Meter Box
Mintaer:
RAC-2
Meter Box dHa:
1.858
lb/hr
Emission Rote,lb/hr PMRc: 8.654
Dry Gas Meter Cal
T: 1.000
Assumed Moisture:
30.00
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr f>MRc: 3.925
Leak Test
Rate, CFM: 0.015
Leak Test Vac, in Hg:
5.00
mg
100 1 00.000mg
Sarrple
Dry Gas
mg/dsewi
Concentration, mg/dscm: 68.186
Point
Time
Meter Reading
Delta P Delta N Gas Meter
Stack
gr/dscf
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.030
Nun
(¦in)
(cu ft)
tin H20) (in H201 T««o (eF>
Ten© (OF)
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 8.654
1
0
497.244
0.070 0.700 96.0
1161.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 3.925
2
15
504.420
0.070 0.700 98.0
1340.0
3
30
511.625
0.060 0.700 109.0
1300.0
¦9
100 100.000ng
4
45
518.910
0.070 0.700 113.0
1335.0
•g/dsca
Concentration, mg/dscn: 68.186
5
60
526.212
0.050 0.700 120.0
1339.0
gr/dscn
Concentration, gr/dscn: 0.030
6
75
532.560
0.070 0.700 122.0
1360.0
lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 8.6S4
7
90
S39.400
0.060 0.700 124.0
1367.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 3.925
8
105
546.700
0.060 0.700 124.0
1360.0
9
120/OFF
553.626
10
••
--
11
..
-~
12
•-
..
-
13
--
..
••
14
--
..
•-
15
--
--
--
•-
16
17
..
..
..
18
-
--
-
--
19
--
--
..
-•
20
••
--
--
--
21
--
••
..
--
2Z
••
-•
..
23
-
~-
..
--
24
--
••
..
••
25
--
..
..
-•
FlMAl/AVC 120 S6.382 C.064 0.7C0 113.2 1320.2
C-75
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Inlet
ket Rin Time: 120 min
hun Sampling Points: 6
Run No.: IN—NI—12D Date: 6/7/90
Operator: IT
Run Start Time: 1001
Run Stop Time: 1201
ISOKINETIC DATA
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
Fg Flue Gas Static Press, in N20:
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in H$:
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
Vw(std) Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
XCOZ Percent C02 by Volume, Dry:
X02 Percent 02 by Voluw, Dry:
Mfd Ory Hole Fraction:
Fo Orsat Validation Value:
*i Estimated Ory Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Hole: 30.00
Ms Wet Hoi. ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 26.19
29.800
0.000
29.800
493.1
23.210
31.72
5.00
14.00
0.683
1.58
Nozzle Number:
CP
Pi tot Tube Coef.:
0.640
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
C.375
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
144CO.O
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec;
: 27.4
Osd
Volunctric Air Flow Rate,
Dry SCFM: 33058.8
Qaw
Vclunetric Air Flow Rate,
Uet ACFM: >64175.3
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,
X: 164.2
Vm(0ry)
Voluae Gas Metered, Dry:
54.275
Vn(Std)
Voluae Gas Metered, Std:
49.965
Meter Box timber:
Ory Gas Meter Cal. Y:
Leak Test Rate, CFM:
rigLp patft
RAC 3
1.000
0.025
Meter Box dHa: 1.849
Assorted Moisture: 30.00
Leak Test Vac, In Hg: 6.00
Sample
Ory Gas
Point
Ti®e
Meter Reading
Delta P
Delta H
Gas Meter
Stack
Nun
(min)
(in H20)
(in H20)
Terno (OF)
Ten© 6
100.0 100.000o«
mg/dscm
Concentration, ag/dsca:
70.679
gr/dscf
Concentration, gr/dscf:
0.031
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc:
8.751
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc:
3.969
•5
100.0 lOO.OOOmg
bg/dscn
Concentration, mg/dscm:
70.679
gr/dscf
Concentration, gr/dscf:
0.031
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PKRc:
8.751
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PHfic:
3.969
"C
100.0 lOO.OOOmg
ag/dsca
Concentration, mg/dscm:
70.679
gr/dscm
Concentration, gr/dscm:
0.031
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc:
8.751
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc:
3.969
C-76
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Midpoint
Run No.: MID-MMTL-12A Date: 6/7/90
Operator: GCfl
Met Run Time: 120 min
Run Start Tine: 1015
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nub Sampling Points: 8
Run Stop Time: 1215
Mozzle Number:
T 27
Pressures:
CP
Pitot Tii>e Coef.:
0.840
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.500
Dia
Nozzle Dianeter, in:
0.245
Pfi Flue Cas Static Press, in H20:
¦30.000
A
Stack/Ouct Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
27.294
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
35.0
Qsd
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Ory SCFN:
15680.5
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM:
19219.2
vie Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
100.0
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
100.7
Vw(std) Volume of Uatcr Vapor, SCF:
4.707
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
6.50
Vn(Dry)
Volume Gas Metered, Dry:
73.287
XC02 Percent CC2 by Voluae, Dry:
5.00
Vn(Std)
Volune Cas Metered, Std:
67.732
XQ2 Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
14.00
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction:
0.935
Fo Orsat Validation value: 1.35
Md Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Hole: 30.00
Ms Met Mol. Ut, Ib/Lb-Mole: 29.22
Meter Box Nififaer:
Dry Gas Meter Cat. Y:
leak Test Rate. CFM:
FIELD DATA
A-1 Meter Box dHa:
0.986 Assuaed Moisture:
0.004 Leak Test Vac, in Hg:
2.270
7.00
10.00
EMISSIONS RESULTS
mg 100 100.000mg
mg/dsca Concentration, ng/dscn: 52.139
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.023
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 3.062
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.339
Point
Nun
Sample
Time
(min)
Dry Cas
Meter Reading
(cu ft)
Delta P
(in H20)
Delta H
(in H20)
Cas Meter
Teao (oF)
Stack
Tenc (oF)
mg
mg/dscm
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
100 100.000n«
Concentration, mg/dsc®: 52.139
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.023
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 3.062
1
0
5C3.265
0.320
1.300
96.0
92.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.389
2
15
512.501
0.320
1.300
96.0
92.0
3
30
520.882
0.350
1.400
96.0
92.0
mo
100 lOO.OOOmg
4
45
530.076
0.350
1.400
96.0
92.0
mg/dscm
Concentration, mg/dsca: 52.139
5
60
539.324
0.350
1.400
97.0
92.0
gr/dscn
Concentration, gr/dsca: 0.023
6
75
548.548
0.350
1.400
98.0
92.0
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 3.062
7
90
557.798
0.350
1.450
100.0
92.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.389
8
105
567.158
0.350
1.450
100.0
92.0
9
120/OFF
576.552
FINAL/AVS 120
73.287
0.342
1.387
97.4
92.0
C-77
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9 Rur
i No.
MID-HMTL-12B Date:
6/7/90
Sampling Location: Midpoint
Operator: GC6
Met Rur. T ime: 120 min
Run
Start Time
: 1017
ISOKINETIC DATA
Jiun Sanpling Points: 8
Run
Stop Time:
1217
Nozzle Winter:
T 28
Pressures:
CP
Pi tot Tube Cocf.:
0.840
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Kg:
29.500
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.245
P9 Flue Gas Static Press, in h20:
-30.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
27.294
Vs
Qsd
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
35.1
15811.5
Moisture Data:
daw
Volunetric Air Flow Sate, Wet ACFM:
19312.8
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, t»l;
100.0
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
105.5
Vw(std) Volime of Water Vapor, SCF:
4.707
Xn20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
6.17
VcKDry)
Voluae Gas Metered, Dry:
74.560
XC02 Percent C02 by Vclune, Ory:
5.00
Vm(Std)
Votuae Gas Metered, Std:
71.536
XC2 Percent C2 by Volune, Dry:
H.OO
Mfd Dry Hole Fraction:
0.938
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.36 EMISSIONS RESULTS
Hd Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/lb-Hole: 30.00
NS
Uet Mol. tft
, Lb/Lb-Mole:
29.26
"9
ng/dscm
100 100.000mg
Concentration, mg/dscm: 49.367
FIELD DATA
gr/d6cf
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.022
Meter
Box Nunber:
A-2
Meter Box dHa:
2.047
Ib/hr
Emission Rate,lb/hr PHRc: 2.923
Dry Gas Meter Cal.
Y: 1.024
Assured Moisture:
7.00
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kfl/hr PMRc: 1.326
leak Test Rate, CFK: 0.001
Leak Test Vac, In Hg:
10.00
"9
100 lOO.COOog
Sample
Cry Gas
ng/cscm
Concentration, mg/dscm: 49.367
Point
T ime
Meter Reading
Delta P Delta H Gas Meter
Stack
gr/dscf
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.022
MOT
(min)
lev ft)
tin H?0) (in N20) TeffiD
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULT8 TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sa-rpting Location: Midpoint
Net Run Time: 120 win
Nun Saopling Points: 8
Run No.: MID-NI-12D Date: 6/7/90
Operator: CCB
Run Start Time: 1021
Run Stop Tine: 1221
Pressures:
Pfcar Barometric Pressure, in Kg:
Pg flue Css Static Press, in H20:
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. liquid Collected, ml:
Vw(std) Volume of Water Vapor, SCF:
29.500
-JO.000
27.294
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
XC02 Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
XC2 Percent 02 by Volune, Ory:
Mfd Ory Mole Fraction:
Fo Orsat Validation Value:
Md Estimated Ory Mol. Vt, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms Uet Mol. Ut, Lb/lb-Mole: 29.25
100.0
4.707
6.25
5.00
14.00
0.938
1.38
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle Nunber:
I 31
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Dia
Nozzle Oiameter, in:
0.245
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
35.1
osd
Voluaetric Air Flow Rate, Ory SCFM:
15001.2
Osw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Uct ACFM:
19315.8
X!
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
104.2
Vm<0ry)
Volume Gas Metered, Dry:
66.671
Vm(Std) Voltne Gas Metered, Std:
7C.61I
FIELD DATA
Meter Sox Niffber: 8-2
Ory Gas Meter Cal. T: 1.131
Leak Test Rate, CfM: 0.001
Meter Box dHa: 2.125
Assured Moisture: 7.00
leek Test Vac, in Hg: 10.00
nig
mg/dscm
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
Point
Nun
Sample
Time
fmin)
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
tcu ft)
Delta P
(in K20)
Delta H
(in H2Q)
Cas Meter
Tefio foF)
Stock
1e«© (oF)
¦8
mg/dscn
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
1
6
911.894
0.320
1.300
96.0
92.0
Kg/hr
2
21
919.812
0.350
1.400
96.0
92.C
3
36
928.121
0.350
1.400
96.0
92.0
H
4
51
936.511
0.350
1.400
96.0
92.0
mg/dscm
5
66
944.872
0.350
1.400
98.0
92.0
gr/dsca
6
81
953.272
0.350
1.4C0
98.0
92.0
Lb/hr
7
96
961.601
0.350
1.450
100.0
92.0
Kg/hr
8
111
97C.132
C.350
1.450
100.0
92.0
9
120/OFF
978.565
EMISSIONS RESULTS
100 100.000ms
Concentration, ng/dsan: 50.013
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.022
Emission Rete,lb/hr PMRc: 2.960
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PHRc*. 1.342
100 100.000mg
Concentration, mg/cscm: 50.013
Concentration, Br/dsef: 0.022
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 2.960
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.342
100 100.000n«
Concentration, mg/csc®: 50.013
Concentration, gr/dscn: 0.022
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 2.960
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.342
Flh'AL/AVC 120
66.671
0-346
_2IJ_
C-79
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9 Run No.
: OUT-MMTL-X2A Oate:
6/7/90
Sampling Location: Outlet
Operator: MLH
Net Run Tine: 12G min
Run
Start Time: 1015
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nob Sampling Points: 8
Rin
Stop Time: 1215
N02zle kuTber:
T-7
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Ng:
29.600
Oia
Nozzle Ciaoeter, in:
0.242
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
-0.380
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps Absolute Flue Cos Press, in Hg:
29.572
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
36.9
Qsd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Ory SCFM:
16609.3
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Voluaetric Air Flow Rate, Uct ACFM:
20294.5
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, oil:
75.7
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
103.4
Vw(std) Voiune of Water Vapor, SCF:
3.563
Xri20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
4.73
Vn(Dry)
Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
76.120
XC02 Percent C02 by Voluae, Dry:
5.00
VnCStd)
Volune Gas Metered, Std:
71.808
X02 Percent 02 by Volune, Ory:
14.00
Mfd Ory Mole Fraction:
0.953
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.36
Kd Estimated Dry Hoi. Vt, Lb/Lb-Hole: 30.00
Ms wet Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.43
Meter Box Hurtcr:
Ory Cas Meter Cal. Y:
Leek Test Rate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
EN-2 Meter Box dMa:
0.965 Assuoed Moisture:
0.012 Leek Test Vac, In Hg:
1.969
6.00
15.00
EMISSIONS RESULTS
rag 100.0 100.000
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Outlet
Run No.: OUT-MMTL-12B Date: 6/7/90
Operator: HIH
Kct Run Time: 120 min
Run
Start Time: 1016
ISOKINETIC DATA
Kuc Sampling Points: 8
Run
Stop T ime: 1216
Nozzle Hunker:
T-fi
Pressures:
Cp
Pi tot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Pbsr Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.600
Dia
Noizle Diameter, in:
0.245
Pg Flue Cas Static Press, in H20;
~0.3B0
A
Stack/Duel Area, in2;
1319.5
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg
29.572
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
36.9
Csd
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFH:
16629.C
Moisture Data:
Qaw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFH:
202118.7
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, oil:
74.0
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
103.3
Vw(std) Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
3.483
XM20 Hoisture Content, X by Vol.:
4.59
Vm(Dry)
Volune Cas Metered, Dry:
81.468
XC02 Percent CC2 by Volume, Dry:
5.00
Vm(Std)
Volune Gas Metered, Std:
72.444
XC2 Percent 02 by Voluie, Dry:
14.00
Hfd Dry Hole Fraction:
0.954
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.38
Md Estimated Dry Hoi. Wt, Lb/Lb-Mote: 30.00
Ms Uet Hoi. Ut, Ib/Lb-Mole: 29.45
Heter Box Munber:
Dry Cas Heter Cal. Y:
Leak Test Rate, CFM:
FIELD
EM-1
0.932
0.140
DATA
Heter Box dHa:
Assumed Hoisture:
Leak Test Vac, in H$:
1.969
6.00
15.00
EMISSIONS RESULTS
mg 100.0 1 00.000(ii8
jng/dscw Concentration, ng/dsac: 46.746
gr/dscf Cooccntration, gr/dscf: 0.021
Lb/hr Emission Rate,Ib/hr PHRc: 3.036
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PHRc: 1.377
Pcint
Nun
Sarap; c
T ime
(irin)
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
feu ft)
Delta P
(in K20")
Delta K
(in H?0)
Cas Meter
Temp (oH
Stack
Term (oF)
®9
mg/dsca
gr/dscf
lb/hr
100.0 ICO.OOOmg
Concentration, mg/dscm: 48.748
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.021
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PHRc: 3.036
1
0
485.004
0.350
1.240
80.0
146.0
Kg/nr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PHRc: 1.377
2
15
494.620
0.370
1.310
83.0
145.0
3
30
504.550
0.36C
1.270
68.0
144.0
mg
100.0 100.000mg
4
45
514.410
0.380
1.340
90.0
144.0
mg/dsan
'Concentration, mg/dscm: 48.748
5
60
524.630
0.400
1.420
91.0
142.0
gr/dscm
Concentration, gr/dsctn: 0.021
6
75
535.210
0.380
1.340
93.0
147.0
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 3.036
7
90
545.510
0.390
1.380
95.0
152.0
Kj/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PHRc: 1.377
8
105
555.910
0.400
1.420
95.0
16C.0
9
120/0FF
566.472
10
-•
••
••
--
-
--
11
--
-•
--
—
--
12
-•
-•
• •
--
• •
13
-•
-•
—
•-
14
--
-•
-
--
15
--
--
--
--
--
16
••
--
-•
-•
--
17
1 ft
••
--
--
--
--
1 9
19
..
..
20
••
-•
••
••
-
••
21
••
-•
22
--
--
-•
••
¦¦
--
23
••
••
¦¦
••
--
-•
24
••
-•
••
-•
-•
25
*•
Flfc'Al/AVG
120
81.468
0.379
1.340
89.4
147.5
C-81
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULT8 TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Outlet
Net Rlti Time: 120 min
Kxi sampling Points: 8
Run No.: OUT-NI-12C Date: 6/7/90
Operator: RIM
Run Start Tine: 1015
Run Stop Tine: 1215
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in K20:
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
Vw
Tetx>
Ten> (oF^
1
0
918:510
0.350
1.170
84.0
146.0
2
15
927.872
0.370
1.240
93.0
145.0
3
30
937.541
0.360
1.200
100.0
144.0
4
45
947.133
0.380
1.270
105.0
144.0
5
60
956.982
0.400
1.340
108.0
142.0
6
75
967.235
0.380
1.270
110.0
147.0
7
90
977.203
0.390
1.300
112.0
152.0
8
105
987.122
0.400
1.340
114.0
160.0
9
120/OFF
997.299
10
--
--
••
--
11
••
••
••
--
--
12
-•
••
--
--
13
--
• •
--
• •
• •
14
--
--
--
--
--
15
-
--
--
•-
--
16
-•
--
--
-
--
17
-*
-
--
-
-
18
-•
—
--
--
—
19
--
--
-
-•
2D
••
••
—
--
••
21
•*
--
--
••
22
-
--
--
--
—
23
-
••
••
--
--
24
--
-¦
-•
-•
--
25
••
**
••
••
F1NAL/AVG
120
78.789
0.379
1.266
103.2
147.5
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle Nurber:
T-5
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
C.B40
Dia
Not2le Diameter, in:
0.244
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Vs
Flue Gas velocity. Ft/sec:
36.9
Osd
Voluaetric Air Flow Rate, Ory SCFM:
16618.8
Qaw
Volimetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM:
20291.7
XI
Isokinetic Saapling Rate, X:
102.2
Viri(Ory) Voluae Gas Metered, Ory:
Vra(Std) Vol me Gas Metered, Std:
78.789
72.221
mg
mg/dson
flr/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
mg
na/dscm
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
mg/dsca
gr/dscm
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
EMISSIONS RESULTS
100 loo.oooae
Concentration, Mg/dsca*. 48.898
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.021
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 3.043
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.380
100 100.000mg
Concentration, mg/dson: 48.898
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.021
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 3.043
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.380
100
Concentration.
ng/dscm:
Concentration, gr/dscm*.
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc:
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc:
100.000ng
48.898
0.021
3.043
1.380
C-82
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULT8 TABULATION
Plant: site 9
Sampling Location: Outlet
Met Run Time: 120 min
Nun Sampling Points: 8
Run Mo.: OUT-NI-12C Date: 6/7/90
Operator: RLM
Run Start Tine: 1C15
R-jn Stop Tine: 1215
ISOKINETIC DATA
fcozzlc Mmbcr:
T'5
Pressures:
CP
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.600
Oia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.244
Fg flue Cas Static Press, in H20:
-0.383
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
131V.i
Ps Absolute Flue Cas Press, in Hg:
29.572
Vs
Flue Cas Velocity, Ft/scc:
36.9
Qsd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Ory SCFM:
166*8.6
Moisture Data;
Qaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Uet ACFM:
2029'.7
Vic Vol. liqjid Collected, ml:
75.0
Xt
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,
X:
102.2
Vw(std) Voluoe of Water Vapor, SCF:
3.530
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
4.66
V*(0ry) Vol tine Gas Metered, Ory:
78.789
XC02 Percent C02 by Volume, Ory:
5.00
Vm(Std) Volune Cas Metered, Std:
72.221
X02 Percent 02 by Volume, Dry:
14.00
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction:
0.953
Fo Orsat Vaiidation Vatue: 1.36
Md Estimated Ory Mol. Ut, Ib/ib-Mole: 30.00
Ms Uet Mol. Ut, Lb/lb*Hole: 29.44
Meter Sox Number:
Ory Cas Meter Cat. Y:
Leak Test Rate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
N-16
0.986
0.011
Meter Box dHa: 1.820
Assured Moisture: 6.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 5.00
EMISSIONS RESULTS
nig 100 100.000ms
ns/dsctn Concentration, ng/dscm: 48.898
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.021
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 3.043
Kg/hr Emission Rote(Kg/hr PMRc: 1.380
Point
Nun
Satnple
Tine
(mini
Ory Gas
Meter Reeding
mg
ng/dscm
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
100 100.000mg
Concentration, mg/ascm: 48.898
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.021
Emission Rate.Lb/hr PMRc: 3.043
1
0
918.510
0.350
1.170
84.0
146.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate.Kg/hr PMRc:
1.380
2
15
927.872
0.370
1.240
93.0
145.0
3
30
937.541
0.360
1.200
100.0
144.0
¦9
100
100.000ms
4
45
947.133
0.380
1.273
105.0
144.0
¦g/dscn
Concentration, ag/dsca:
48.898
5
60
956.982
0.400
1.340
108.0
142.0
gr/dsaa
Concentration, gr/dsca:
0.021
6
75
967.235
0.380
1.270
110.0
147.0
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMftc:
3.043
7
90
977.203
0.390
1.300
112.0
152.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc
: 1.380
8
105
987.122
0.400
1.340
114.0
160.0
9
120/OFF
997.299
FlHA^AVq 1j>?
78.789
0.379
1.266
10
IhLk
C-83
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RE8ULTB TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location; Outlet
Net Run Time: 120 min
Hun Sampling Points: 8
Run No.: OUT-NI-12D Oate: 6/7/90
Operator: rih
Run Start Tie*: 1016
Run Stop Time: 1216
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg; 29.600
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in K20: -0.400
Ps Absolute flue Gas Press, in Hg: 29.571
Koisture Data:
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml: 75.0
Vw(std) Volume of Water Vapor, SCf: 3.530
%H20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.: 4.89
XC02 Percent C02 by Volune, Dry: 5.00
X32 Percent 02 by Voluae, Dry: 14.03
Mfd Dry Hole fraction: 0.951
Fo Orsat Volidation Value: 1.38
Md Estimated Dry Hoi. tft, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms bet Mol. Ut, Ib/lb-Mole: 29.41
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle hurber:
1-6
Cp
Pi tot TiA* Coef .:
0.840
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.239
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
36.9
Osd
Volunetric Air Flow Rote, Dry SCFM:
16584.7
Oaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFM:
20303.7
X!
Isokinetic Sampling Rote, X:
101.5
Vm(Dry) Volime Gas Metered, Dry:
Vm(Std) Volume Gas Metered, Std:
76.202
68.695
Meter Box Nuifcer:
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y:
Leak Test Rote. CFM:
FIELD DATA
NU-7
0.969
0.009
Meter Box dHa: 1.820
Assumed Moisture: 6.00
Leak Test Voc, in Hg: 5.00
EMISSIONS RESULTS
ag 100 100.000mg
ag/dsan Concentration, ng/dscn: 51.408
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.022
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 3.193
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.448
Point
Win
Sample
Time
(min)
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
(cu ft)
Delta P
(in H20)
Delta K
(in H20)
Gas Meter
Tee© (oF)
Stack
Terno (oF)
mg
mQ/dscm
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
1C0 100.000mg
Concentration, mg/dscm: 51.408
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.022
Emission Rate.Lb/hr PMRc: 3.193
1
0
445.160
0.350
1.170
85.0
146.0
ICg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc
1.448
2
15
453.942
0.370
1.240
94.0
144.0
3
30
463.327
0.360
1.200
100.0
145.0
mg
100
lOO.OOOrag
4
45
472.637
0.380
1.270
105.0
143.0
mg/dscjn
Concentration, ag/dsca:
51.408
5
60
482.147
0.400
1.340
107.0
143.0
gr/dscm
Concentration, gr/dscn:
0.022
6
75
492.056
0.380
1.270
109.0
148.0
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc
3.193
7
90
501.682
0.390
1.300
112.0
154.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc
1.448
8
105
511.450
0.400
1.340
114.0
158.0
9
120/OFF
521.362
10
••
••
••
--
-•
11
-•
-•
--
--
12
--
••
••
-
«•
13
--
-~
-•
14
--
--
-•
--
--
15
--
-•
--
-•
-•
-•
16
--
--
••
-•
-•
17
-*
••
••
-•
••
18
••
••
-•
--
19
••
••
• -
• •
• •
20
-¦
•-
--
••
-•
--
21
••
••
••
••
••
••
22
--
--
¦¦
••
--
--
23
--
--
--
--
--
24
•-
--
--
--
--
25
--
--
FINAl/AVG
120
76.202
0.379
1.266
103.2
147.6
C-84
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Flint: Site 9
Sailing Location: Inlet
Run Mo.: IN-MKTL-13A Date: 6/7/9C
Operator: LT
Met Run Time: 100 nin
Run Start Time: 1620
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nun Samplwig Points: 7
Run Stop Time: 1800
Nozzle Number;
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.84C
Roar Barcwetric Pressure, in hg:
29.850
Die
Nozzle Oiameter, in:
0.375
Pg Flue Cas Static Press, in H20:
C.000
A
Stack/Duel Area, in2:
14400.0
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg
29.850
vs
Flue Cas Velocity, Ft/sec:
25.7
Qsd
Volunetric Air Flo* Rate, Dry SCFM:
29958.1
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Vet ACFH:
154369.1
vie Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
537.5
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X*.
193.9
Vw(std) Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
25.300
Xh2o Moisture Content, X by- Vol.:
36.22
Vm(Dry) Volume Gas Metered, Dry:
47.850
XC02 Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
5.00
Vm(Std)
Volime Gas Metered, Std:
44.547
*02 Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
14.00
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction:
0.638
Fo Orsat validation Value: 1.38
Md Estiaated Dry Mol. Ut, lb/lb-Hotc: 30.00
Ms Wet Mot. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 25.65
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Niaber; RAC 1
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y: 1.000
leak Test Rate. CFM: 0.015
Meter Box dHa: 1.851
Assuned Moisture: 30.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 6.00
Sanple
Dry Cas
Point
Tine
Meter Reading
Delta P
Delta H
Cas Meter
Stack
Nin
(min)
(CO ft)
fin K20)
(it H?0)
Temo
Tw (oF)
1
0
611.370
0.060
0.700
101.0
1250.0
2
15
618.830
0.070
0.700
103.0
1250.0
3
30
625.914
0.060
0.700
105.0
1264.0
4
45
633.200
0.040
0.700
105.0
1284.0
5
60
640.250
0.050
0.700
107.0
1280.0
6
75
647.300
0.060
0.700
11C.0
1260.0
7
90
657.200
0.060
0.700
115.0
1270.0
8
100/OFF
659.220
9
-~
--
-•
-•
--
10
••
--
11
••
••
••
12
—
—
••
13
--
••
14
-
-•
••
15
-
--
-•
••
16
--
-•
--
--
17
--
-~
-*
16
--
-•
--
19
--
-•
--
20
--
--
--
--
21
--
-•
-
-•
22
••
-•
--
23
-•
--
--
--
24
-•
••
-•
-•
25
F1KAL/AVG
100
47.850
0.057
0.700
106.6
1271.1
EMISSIONS RESULTS
tag 100 lOO.OOOmg
ng/dscm Concentration, mg/dscm: 79.273
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf; 0.035
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 8.894
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PHRc: 4.034
mg 100 lOC.OQOmg
mg/dsem Concentration, «g/dsc*: 79.275
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.035
Lb/hr Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 8.894
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PHRc: 4.034
ng 100 100.000ng
mg/dscm Concentration, sig/dscra: 79.275
gr/dscm Concentration, gr/dsca: 0.035
Lb/hr Emission ftate,Lb/hr PMRc: 8.894
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PHRc: 4.034
C-85
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant:
: Site 9 Ran Mo.
: IN-MMTL-13B
Date: 6/7/90
Sanpli
log Location: Inlet
Operator:
LT
Net Run Tine: 100 min Run
Start Tine*. 1620
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nui Sampling Points: 7 Run
Stop Tifte: 1800
Mo?zle Nuetr:
Pressures:
CP
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.84C
Pbar
Barometric Pressure, in Ng:
29.650
Dia
Mozsle Oiareter, in:
0.375
PS
Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
0.000
A
Stack/Ouct Area, irt2:
1440C.0
Ps
Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Kg:
29.850
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
25.8
Qsd
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
29219.3
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFM:
154851.5
Vic
Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
608.0
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
208.5
Vw(std) Volitoe of Water Vapor, SCF:
28.619
XX 20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
37.99
Va(Dry)
Vol Lire Gas Metered, Dry:
50.053
XCC2
Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
5.00
V«KStd)
Vol tine Gas Metered, Std:
46.716
X02
Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
K.00
Mfe
Dry Mole Fraction:
0.620
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.38
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Md
Estimated Ory Mol. Wt, Lb/Lb-Mole:
30.00
Ms
Uet MoU Ut, Lb/Lb-Hole:
25.44
mg
1C0.0 100.000a*
Meter Sox Nifnber:
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y:
Leak Test Rate. CFM:
FIELD DATA
RAC 2
1.000
C.007
Meter Box dHa: 1.869
Assuaed Moisture: 30.00
Leak Test Vac, in Kg: 5.00
Sarrple
Ory Gas
Point
Tine
Meter Reading
Delta f
Delta H
Cas Meter
Stack
Hun
(min)
(cu ft)
(in H20)
(in H20}
Te«o (oFI
Ten© foF)
1
0
761.777
0.070
0.700
98.0
1250.0
2
15
768.780
0.070
0.700
99.0
1250.0
3
30
777.120
0.040
0.700
101.0
1284.0
4
45
784.540
0.050
0.700
106.0
1284.0
5
60
792.150
0.050
0.700
107.0
1280.0
6
75
799.534
0.060
0.700
111.0
1280.0
7
90
807.016
0.060
0.700
114.0
1270.0
e
o
1CO/OFF
811.830
V
10
..
..
--
..
..
n
--
--
-•
-
••
-•
12
• -
• •
--
--
--
••
13
*•
••
H
-•
-
••
-
•-
15
--
--
--
16
-•
-•
••
••
••
•-
17
-•
••
••
-•
-
18
--
--
-•
-•
--
•-
19
-
••
-•
••
--
••
20
—
-•
••
••
••
—
21
•-
--
-
••
--
22
••
••
-•
••
--
--
23
-~
••
-•
~~
-•
-
24
—
••
-•
••
-•
--
25
-•
*•
-•
*•
F1NAL/AVG
100
50.053
0.057
C.700
105.1
1271.1
mg/dsesi Concentration, mg/dsan: 75.595
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.033
Lb/hr Mission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 8.272
Kg/hr Emission Rate.Kg/hr PMRc: 3.752
mg 100.0 100.000mg
mg/dscm Concentration, ng/dsan: 75.595
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.033
Lb/hr Emission Rate,Lb/hr PKRc: 8.272
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 3.752
mg 100.0 iOO.OOOng
ng/dsori Concentration, mg/dsan: 75.595
gr/dsca Concentration, gr/dsca: 0.033
Lb/hr Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 8.272
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc; 3.752
C-86
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RE9ULT8 TABULATION
P^ant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Inlet
IN-NI-13C
Operator:
Date: 6/7/90
IT
N«t Klvi
Tiae: 100 nin Run
Start Time: 1620
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nun Sarpling Points: 7 Run
Stop T ime: 1800
Mozzlc liuitoer:
Pressures:
CP
Pi tot Tube Coef
0.840
Pbar
Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.850
Oia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.375
Pfl
Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
0.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1UOO.O
Ps
Absolute flue Gas Press, in Ng:
29.850
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
25.6
Osd
Voluaetric Air flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
33416.2
Moisture Data:
Oau
Volunctric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACfM:
153841.0
Vic
Vol. Liquid Collected, nl:
395.0
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
181.0
Vw(std) Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
18.593
XK20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
28.62
Vm(Ory)
Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
48.4C0
XCC2
Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
5.00
Vm($td)
Volume Gas Metered, Std:
46.381
X02
Percent 02 by Volune, Ory:
14.00
Mfd
Dry Hole Fraction:
0.714
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.38
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Me
Estimated Ory Mol. Vt, Lb/Lb-Mote:
30.00
Ms
Wet Mol. Vt, Lb/Lb-Mole:
26.57
¦9
100 ICO.OOOmg
Meter Box Nuaber:
Cry Gas Meter Cal. f:
leak Test Rate, CFN:
FIELD DATA
RAC-2
1.000
0.011
Meter Box dHa: 1.858
Assuned Moisture: 30.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 6.00
Staple
Dry G«S
Point
Time
Meter Reading
Delta P
Delta K
Gas Meter
Stack
Nun
(mini
(CU ft)
(in H20)
(in H201
Tec©
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant • Site 9
Run h'o.
: IN-NI-13D
Date: 6/7/90
Sanpling Location: inlet
Operator:
LT
Met Run Time: 100 mln
Run
Start Time: 1620
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nun Saaplin$ Points: 7
Run
Stop T ime: 1800
Nozzle Number:
Pressures:
CP
Pi tot Tube Coef.:
0.640
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in
Hg:
29.850
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.375
Pg Flue Gas Static Press.
in K20:
0.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
14400.C
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press
. in Hg:
29.850
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
26.0
Osd
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Ory SCFM:
33663.8
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Volmetric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACfM:
155936.0
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected,
ml:
407.5
*1
Isokinetic Sanpling Rate, X:
181.4
Vw(std) Volume of Water Vapor, SCf:
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
XC02 Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
X02 Percent 02 by Volune, try:
Hfd Ory Mole friction:
Fo Orsat Validation Value:
Md Estimated Dry Moi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms Uet Mol. ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 26.51
19.161
29.05
5.00
U.00
0.709
1.58
50.563
46.639
Meter Box Nurtoer:
Ory Gas Meter Cal. Y:
leak Test Rate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
RAC3
1.000
o.ou
Meter Box dHa: 1.849
As timed Moisture: 30.00
Leak Test Vac, in Kg: 8-00
Sample
Dry Gas
Point
Time
Meter Reading
Delta P
Delta H
Gas Meter
Stack
Nun
(min)
(cu ft)
(in H?0)
(in H?0)
Ten® (oF)
Tefi> (oF)
1
0
248.337
0.060
0.700
101.0
1250.0
2
15
255.000
0.060
0.700
102.0
1250.0
3
30
261.914
0.070
0.700
104.0
1284.0
4
45
268.432
0.060
0.700
106.0
1284.0
5
60
275.418
0.050
0.700
109.0
1280.0
6
75
282.316
0.060
0.700
113.0
1280.0
7
90
289.273
0.060
C.700
115.0
1270.0
8
100/OFF
298.700
9
••
--
-¦
--
10
--
--
--
--
--
11
•-
--
-~
--
12
••
--
• •
-
--
13
••
--
-•
--
--
14
--
••
• •
-•
-•
15
--
-
-•
--
16
-
..
--
-•
17
--
--
-*
••
--
18
••
--
--
--
-•
',9
-~
--
-
-•
2C
--
-•
--
• •
• •
21
••
• •
• •
..
-•
22
--
--
--
-•
23
-•
• •
• -
24
••
-•
--
--
--
25
••
-•
--
--
FJKAL/AVG
100
50.363
0.060
0.700
107.1
1271.1
Vm(Dry) Volume Cos Metered, Dry:
Vm(std) Volune Gas Metered. Std:
EMISSIONS RESULTS
ag 100 100.00Qmg
ng/dsca Concentration, ne/dscn: 75.396
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.033
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 9.505
Kg/hr Emission Rate.Kg/hr PHRc: 4.312
mg 100 100.000ng
mg/dsca Concentration, rog/dsan: 75.396
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.033
Lb/hr Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 9.505
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PHRc: 4.312
ng 100 100.000og
mg/dscm Concentration, mg/dsctn; 75.396
gr/dsc«i Concentration, gr/dson: 0.033
Lb/hr Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 9.505
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 4.312
C-88
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RE8ULTB TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling location; Midpoint
Ket Run Time: 120 rain
Not Stapling Points: 5
Run No.: MID-MMTL-13A Date: 6/7/90
Operator: CC6
Run Start Time: 1602
Rin Stop Tine: 1802
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, In hq:
P9 Hue Gas Static Press, in H20;
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
Vw(std) Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
29.850
-30.000
27.644
XH20
XC02
X02
Mfd
Fc
Md
Ms
Meter Box Niabtr;
Cry Gas Meter Cal. Y:
Leak Test Rate, CFM:
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
Percent 02 by Voluw, Dry:
Dry Hole Fraction:
Orsat Validation Value:
Estimated Dry Hoi. Ut, ib/lb-Mole: 30.00
Wet Kol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.25
96.9
4.655
6.27
5.00
14.00
0.937
1.38
ISOKINETIC DATA
Moztle Nurber:
72 7
Cp
Pi tot Tiiie Coef.:
0.840
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.245
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
35.6
Osd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM;
16041.2
Qa-
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM:
19575.8
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
101.2
75.382
69.587
FIELD
A-1
0.986
0.003
DATA
Meter Box dHa:
Assured Moisture:
leak Test Vac, in Hg:
2.270
7.00
10.00
Point
Hum
Sample
T iae
twin)
Ory Gas
Meter Reading
feu ft)
0
15
30
4S
60
75
90
105
0/OFF
579.605
589.132
598.351
607.595
616.869
626.329
635.912
645.414
654.987
Delta P
*20)
Delta H
K20)
Gas Meter
Tewo (oF)
0.360
0.340
0.350
0.360
0.360
0.360
0.360
0.360
1.500
1.400
1.400
1.500
1.500
1.500
1.500
1.500
102.0
102.0
104.0
106.0
106.0
106.0
106.0
106.0
Stack
T««p
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Midpoint
Run No.: MID-MMTL-13B Date: 6/7/90
Operator: CC6
Net Run Time: 120 mir
Run Start T ioe: 1604
ISOKINETIC
DATA
Nun Sampling Points: 8
Run Stop Time: 1804
Nozzle Nurber:
T 28
Pressures:
CP
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Pber Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.850
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.245
Pg Flue Cas Static Press, in K20;
•30.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, ir\2:
1319.5
Ps Absolute Flue Cas Press, in Hg
27.644
VS
Flue Cas Velocity, ft/sec
;
35.6
Osd
Voluactric Air Flow Rote,
Dry SCFM:
16026.2
Moisture Data:
Caw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Vet ACFM:
19562.9
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
107.2
X)
Isokinetic Sanpling Rate,
X:
105.7
Vw(std) Vol one of Water Vapor, SCf:
5.046
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
6.49
Vm(Dry)
Volune Cas Metered, Dry:
75.791
XCQ2 Percent C02 by Volune, Ory:
5.00
Voi(Std)
Voluae Cas Metered, Std:
72.645
X02
Mfd
to
Md
Ms
Dry:
Percent 02 by Volune
Dry Mole Fraction:
Orset Validation Value:
Estiftated Dry Kol. Wt, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Uct Mol. Ut, Ib/lb-Mole: 29.22
14.00
0.935
1.38
Meter Sox Hunter; A-2
Dry Gas Meter Cel. Y: 1.024
Leak Test Rate, CFK: 0.001
FIELD DATA
Meter Boa dHa;
Assured Moisture:
Leak Test Vac, in Mg:
2.047
7.00
10.00
Sanple
Dry Gas
Point
Time
Meter Reading
Delta P
Delta K
Gas Meter
Stack
Nun
(filing
(cu ft)
(in H20)
(In K20)
Tewo (of>
Te«t> (o
1
2
404.621
0.360
1.500
102.0
88.0
2
17
141.209
0.340
1.400
102.0
98.0
3
32
423.422
0.350
1.400
104.0
98.0
4
47
432.626
0.360
1.50C
106.0
98.0
5
62
442.085
0.360
1.500
106.0
98.0
6
77
451.609
0.360
1.500
106.0
98.0
7
92
461.168
0.360
1.500
106.0
98.0
I
107
470.898
0.360
1.500
106.0
98.0
9
120/OFF
480.412
10
1 •
-•
••
-•
--
-•
--
1 .
12
..
..
..
..
..
13
--
--
-•
--
--
14
••
••
..
—
-
15
--
--
-¦
--
16
-•
• •
--
17
-•
• •
••
18
• •
-•
-•
-•
--
•>«
--
-•
--
20
-•
-•
•-
-•
--
21
--
•-
--
--
22
••
-•
--
••
-
23
--
••
• -
• •
24
--
-~
••
-•
-•
25
•-
*•
-•
FINAI/AV3
120
75.791
0.356
1.475
104.7
9A.7
EMISSI0N8 RESULTS
mg 100 lOO.OOOmg
mg/dscn Concentration, ng/dsca: 48.613
gr/dsef Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.021
Lb/hr Emission Rate,Ib/hr PMRc: 2.918
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.324
wg 100 100.000ms
Bfl/dsc* Concentration, ng/dson: 48.613
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.021
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PHRc: 2.918
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.324
mg 100 lOO.OOOmg
ng/dscn Concentration, mg/dscn: 48.613
gr/dsaa Concentration, gr/dscn; 0.021
Lb/hr Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 2.916
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRe: 1.324
C-90
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESPLT8 TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Midpoint
Run Ho.: MID-NI-13C Oate: 6/7/90
Operator: GCB
Met Run Time: 120 nin
Run Start Time: 1606
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nun Sampling Points: 8
Run Stop Time: 2006
Nozzle Nurber:
1 30
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tube Cocf.:
0.840
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.850
0
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sapling Location: Midpoint
Run No.; MID-NI-13D Date: 6/7/90
Operator: CCS
Net Run
Time: 120 rain
Run
Start T ime: 1608
ISOKINETIC DATA
Ntn SampIing Points; 8
Run
Stop Tine: 1808
N02Zle Nwber;
T 31
Pressures:
CP
Pitot Tube Coef.:
C.840
Pbar
Baronetric Pressure, in Hg:
29.850
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.245
Pg
Flue Cas Static Press, in H20:
-30.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps
Absolute Flue Gas Press, in kg:
27.644
Vs
Flue Cas Velocity, Ft/scc:
35.6
Osd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Ory SCFM:
16055.5
Moisture Data:
Qow
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM;
19555.0
vie
Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
102.3
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
104.1
Vw(std)
Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
4.815
XH20
Moisture Content, X by vol.:
6.30
Va(Dry)
Voluae Gas Metered, Dry:
67.718
XZ02
Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
5.00
VnrfStd)
Volune Cos Metered, Std:
71.650
X02
Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
14.00
Mfd
Dry Mole Fraction:
0.937
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.38
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Md
Estiaated Dry Mol. Ut, lb/lb*Molc:
30.00
Ms
Wet Mol. Wt, Lb/Lb-Mole:
29.24
ng
100. 100.000mg
FIELD DATA
Meter Sox Nurber: 8*2
Dry Gas Meter Cal. T: 1.131
leak Test Kate, CFM: 0.001
Sample Dry Cas
Point Tire Meter Reoding
Hum (mtn> (cu fo
Meter Box dHa: 2.125
Assuaed Moisture: 7.00
Leak Test Vac, In tig: 10.00
6
21
36
51
66
82
96
0/OFF
981.921
990.406
998.472
1006.659
1015.261
1023.368
1032.368
1041.012
1049.639
aig/dsaa
gr/dscf
lb/hr
Kg/hr
¦9
mg/dscm
Delta P
Delta H
Gas Meter
Stack
gr/dscf
(in N20)
fin H20)
Ten© (oF)
Tec© foF)
Lb/hr
0.360
1.509
102.0
88.0
Kg/hr
0.340
1.400 .
102.0
98.0
0.350
1.400
104.0
98.0
ng
0.360
1.500
106.0
98.0
ng/dsca
0.360
1.500
106.0
98.0
gr/dtcm
0.360
1.500
106.0
96.0
Lb/hr
0.360
1.500
106.0
98.0
Kg/hr
0.360
1.500
106.0
98.0
Concentration, ag/dsae: 49.286
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.022
emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 2.964
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.344
100.0 lOC.OOOmg
Concentration, ag/dscni: 49.288
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.022
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 2.964
Emission Sate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.344
100.0 100.000ag
Concentration, ag/dscm: 49.288
Concentration, gr/dscra: 0.022
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 2.964
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.344
FjKAMVtj 1g(?
67.718
0.356
1.475
104.7
C-92
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location; Outlet
Met R«r Time: 120 ain
Hud Sampling Points: 8
Run Ko.: OUT-MMTL-X3A Date: 6/7/90
Operator; NIK
Run Start Time: 1600
Run Stop lime: 1800
Pressures:
Pber Barometric Pressure, in Hg: 29.850
Pfi Flue Gat Static Press, in H20: -0.560
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Kg: 29.824
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, mi: 90.9
Vw(std) Vol it* of Water Vapor, SCf: 4.279
Xh20 Moisture Content, X by Vcl.: 5.42
XC02 Percent C02 by Volune, Dry: 5.00
X02 Percent 02 by Volune, Ory: 14.00
Nfd Ory Hole Fraction: 0.946
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.38
Kd Estimated Dry Mot. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms Uet Mot. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.35
Meter Box Umber:
Ory Cos Meter Cat. Y:
Leak Test Rate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
EN-2
1.000
0.038
Meter 6ox dn«: 1.969
Assumed Moisture: 6.00
Leak Test V»c, in Hg: 5.00
Sample
Ory Cas
Point
Time
Meter Reading
Delta P
Delta H
Cas Meter
Stock
Nun
(rain}
< in H2Q>
(in H2c>
Tewo (oF>
Tefl© (oH
1
0
277.873
*0.380
1.390
84.0
136.0
2
15
287.400
0.400
1.440
90.0
139.0
3
30
297.240
0.410
1.480
95.0
150.0
4
45
307.230
0.390
1.410
100.0
159.0
5
60
317.040
0.400
1.440
104.0
162.0
6
75
327.010
0.370
1.330
105.0
161.0
7
90
336.640
0.390
1.410
106.0
165.0
8
105
346.520
0.420
1.520
105.0
162.0
9
120/Off
3S6.741
10
-•
--
-¦
--
11
--
--
-•
--
12
--
-•
--
--
13
--
••
--
--
14
--
--
--
••
15
--
-•
--
••
16
-¦
--
--
--
17
--
--
--
••
18
--
-•
••
*•
19
--
-~
•-
--
20
--
••
••
-
21
••
••
--
--
22
-~
-•
--
--
--
23
••
-•
--
••
••
24
••
-¦
-¦
-¦
25
--
--
ft HAL/AVG
120
78.B68
0.395
1.427
98.6
154.2
ISOKINETIC DATA
ilozzle number:
T-7
Cp
Pilot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in;
0.242
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2;
1319.5
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec
: 37.8
Osd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Ory SCfM; 16841.3
Om.
Volunetric Air How Rate,
Uet ACFM: 20783.0
XI
Isokinetic Swrpling Rate,
X; 105.9
Vo(Ory)
Volirne Cas Metered, Dry:
78.868
Vm(Std)
Volune Cas Metered, Std:
74.6C2
EMISSIONS RESULTS
ag 100 lOO.OOOmg
mg/dsem Concentration, mg/dscm: 47.338
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.021
lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/ftr PMRc: 2.986
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.354
ng 1C0 100.000.ng
mg/dsc.'n Concentration, mg/ascm; 47.338
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.021
Lb/hr Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 2.966
Kg/hr Eaission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.354
mg 100 1000.000mg
og/dscm Concentration, ag/dsca: 473.378
gr/dscm Concentration/ gr/dscm: 0.207
Lb/hr Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 29.857
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 13.543
C-93
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sanplfng location: OUtlet
Net Run line: 120 min
Nub Sailing Points: 6
Run No.: OUT-MMTL-13B Date: 6/7/90
Operator: HlH
Run Start Tine: 1601
Run Stop Time: 1801
ISOKINETIC DATA
Kozile Nunbur: T*6
Pressuresj
CP
Pitot Tube Coef.; 0.840
Poar
Bflromrtric Pressure, in Kg:
29.700
Dta
No?ile Diowter, in: 0.P43
P9
Flue Gas Static Press, in H20;
•0.360
A
Stack/Duct Area. ir>2: 13*9.S
Ps
Absolute flue Gas Press, in Hg
: 29.674
Vs
Qui
Flue Gas Velocity, F:/scc: 37.9
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM: 16872.4
Moisture Data:
Qaw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, uet ACFM: 208*3.6
Vic
Vol. Liqjid Collected, ml:
81.3
XI
isokinetic Sampling Rate, X: 104.1
Vtf(std) Voluac of Uater Vapor, SCF:
3.827
XK20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
4.91
V»(Dry)
Volune Cas Metered, Dry: 54.319
XC02
Percent C02 by Volume, Dry:
5.00
Va(Std)
Volune Cas Metered, Std: 74.101
X02
Percent 02 by Voluoe, Dry:
U.00
Mfd
Dry Mole Fraction:
0.951
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.38
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Hd
Estimated Dry Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms
Wet Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
29.41
mg
100.0 100.000mg
mg/dscra Concentration, mg/dscn:: 47.658
FIELD
DATA
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.021
Meter
Box Kunber: EN-1
Meter Box
dHa: 1.934
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,lb/hr PHRc: 3.011
Dry Gas Meter Cal. V: 0.932
Assuned Moisture: 6.00
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMBe: 1.366
Leak
Test Rate, CFH: 0.009
Leak Test
Vac, in Hg: 5.00
Point
Num
Sample
Tine
(min>
Dry Cas
Meter Reading
(cu ft>
Delta ?
(in H20)
Delta N
(in H20>
Gas Meter
Teao (oF5
Stack
T«fl© COF)
Ityj
mg/dscn
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
100.0 109.000ag
Concentration, mg/asar: 47.658
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.021
Emission Rate,Lb/hr pp.Rc: 3.011
1
0
566.472
0.380
1.370
86.0
•136.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,iC9/hr PHRc: 1.366
2
15
576.600
0.400
1.440
89.0
139.0
3
30
587,100
0.410
1.480
94.0
150.0 v
mg
100.0 lOO.COOmg
4
45
597.720
0.390
1.410
98.0
159.0
ng/dscm
Concentration, ng/dsca: 47.658
5
6C
608.240
0.400
1.440
102.0
162.0
gr/dscm
Concentration, gr/dscm: 0.021
6
75
618.910
0.370
1.330
105.0
161.0
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMftc: 3.011
7
9C
629.230
0.390
1.410
105.0
165.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.366
8
105
639.890
0.420
1.520
104.0
162.0
9
120/OFF
650.791
10
••
--
-•
--
11
--
-•
12
-•
..
• •
• •
13
-•
--
--
-¦
-
14
••
••
••
••
15
--
-
-
--
16
-~
••
••
••
••
17
--
--
--
18
--
••
—
••
• •
19
••
-¦
-•
20
-•
• •
• •
• •
• •
21
-•
--
--
--
--
22
*•
••
••
••
-•
23
••
•-
--
--
--
-•
24
--
--
-•
--
-•
25
-•
-•
••
FJMAI/AVG
120
84.319
0.395
1.425
97.9
154.2
C-^4
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Saipling location: Outlet
Net Run Time: 120 min
Nob Sarrplirvg Points: 8
Run Mo.: OUT-NI-13C Date: 6/7/90
Operator: RIM
Run Start Time: 1600
Run Stop Tine: 1800
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle Kurber:
T-5
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
C.S^O
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.850
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, -.n:
C.2U
Pg Flue Ges Static Press, in h20:
•0.320
A
Stack/Cjct Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hj:
29.8?6
Vs
Flue lias Velocity, ft/sec:
37.8
QSO
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
16853.9
Moisture Data:
Qau
Voluaetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM:
20780.1
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
81.7
XI
isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
95.3
Vw(std) Voluw of Water Vapor, SCF:
3.846
XJ-20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
5.33
Vm(Ory)
Volume Gas Metered, Dry:
73.985
XC02 Percent CO? by Voluae, Dry:
5.00
Vm(Std)
Volurte Gas Metered, Std:
68.303
*02 Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
14.00
Mfd Ory Mole Fraction:
0.947
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.38
Md Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Hole: 30.00
Mi uet Hoi. ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.36
Meter Box Nuifccr:
Dry Gas Meter Cal. T:
Leak Test Kate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
N-16
0.996
0.009
Meter Box dKe: 1.820
Assured Moisture: 6.00
Leak Test Vac, in Kg: 5.00
EMISSIONS RESULTS
M9 100 lOQ.OOOmg
¦S/dsc* Concentration, mo/dscra: 51.703
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.023
Ib/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRe: 3.263
Kg/hr Enission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.480
Point
hun
Sample
Time
fmin>
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
(cu ft)
Delta P
fin H20)
Delta H
fin H20)
Gas Meter
Teffip foF)
Stack
Tero foF)
mg
rag/dscn
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
100 100.000ms
Concentration, tig/dscm: 51.703
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.023
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 3.263
1
0
997.500
0.380
1.270
88.0
136.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc:
1.480
2
15
10C7.325
0.400
1.340
98.0
139.0
3
30
1017.419
0.410
1.370
106.0
151.0
mg
100
100.000*3
4
45
1027.796
0.390
1.300
112.0
159.0
mg/dscm
Concentration, mg/dscm:
51.7C3
5
60
1037.847
0.400
1.340
116.0
162.0
gr/dscm
Concentration, gr/dscm:
0.023
6
75
1048.115
0.370
1.240
118.0
161.0
Lb/hr
Emission Rale,Lb/hr PMRc:
3.263
7
90
1057.971
0.390
1.300
120.0
16S.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc:
1.480
8
105
1068.064
0.420
1.400
120.0
162.0
9
12C/0FF
1071.485
r:m/AVC 1?C
73.985
0.395
1.320
109.7
154.4
C-95
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling location: Outlet
Rut No. : OUT-NI-13D Date: 6/7/90
Operator: RIM
Net Run Tine: 120 nin
Rin
Start Time: 1601
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nun Sampling Points: 8
Run
Stop Tine: 1801
koztle Nunber:
T-6
Pressures;
Cp
Pttot Tube Coef.:
0.80
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.850
Dia
fcorile Diameter, in:
0.239
P9 Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
0.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in tig
29.850
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
37.8
Osd
Volunctric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
16896.5
Moisture Data:
Qaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM:
20767.7
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
79.7
XI
Isokinetic Saddling Rate, X:
102.7
Vw(ste) volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
3.751
XM20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
3.03
Vm(Dry)
Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
78.530
XC02 Percent CO? by Volime, Dry:
5.00
ViKStd)
Volume Gas Metered, Std:
70.802
XQ2 Percent 02 by Volutae, Ory:
14.00
Mfd Ory Mole Fraction:
0.950
Fo Or&at Validation Value: 1.38
Md Estimated Ory Hoi. yt, Lb/Lb-Hole: 30.00
Ms Wot Mol. Wt, Lb/Lb-Hole: 29.40
Meter Box Nurber:
Dry Gas Heter Cal. r:
Leak Test Rate, CFH:
FIELD DATA
HU*7 Meter Box dHa: 1.820
0.969 Assuaed Moisture: 6.00
0.008 Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 5.00
¦ng
mg/dscm
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
EMISSIONS RE8ULT8
100 100.000mg
Concentration, mg/dscm: 49.578
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.022
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 3.156
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.432
100
IQO.OOOog
Sample
Dry Gas
mg/dscm
Concentration, mg/dscm:
49.878
Point
Tine
Meter Reading
Delta ?
Delta H
Gas Meter
Stack
gr/dscf
Concentration, gr/dscf:
0.022
Nun
(min")
(eu ft>
(in H201
(in H20)
Teflc foF)
Ten© (oF)
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc:
3.156
1
0
521.400
0.380
1.270
86.0
138.0 '
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc:
1.432
2
15
530.969
0.400
1.340
99.0
141.0
3
30
540.805
0.410
1.370
104.0
151.0
mg
100
100.000n«
4
45
550.705
0.390
1.300
110.0
159.0
ing/dscm
Concentration, ag/dsca:
49.678
5
60
560.434
0.400
1.340
114.0
162.0
gr/dscm
Concentration, gr/dso*:
0.022
6
75
570.385
0.370
1.240
116.0
161.0
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc
3.156
7
90
580.014
0.390
1.300
117.0
165.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc
1.432
8
105
589.795
0.420
1.400
118.0
162.0
9
120/OFF
599.930
10
--
-
-•
--
••
-•
11
-•
-¦
--
-•
-•
-•
12
--
--
••
••
••
--
13
-•
••
--
~~
••
14
••
••
••
••
••
••
15
¦¦
--
--
--
--
-•
16
••
--
--
-•
--
--
17
-•
--
--
--
-•
--
18
--
••
••
--
--
19
—
••
••
••
••
20
2*.
;;
;;
••
--
22
--
• •
--
--
••
• •
23
-¦
• •
••
--
24
••
-¦
--
--
25
••
FINAL/AVS
120
76.530
0.395
1-320
108.0
154.9
C-96
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: site9
Sampling Location:
inlet
Run No.: IN-CR-3A Date: 6/2/90
Operator: mac
ket Run
Time: 120 »in
Run
Start Time: 18:30
ISOKINETIC DATA
Hun Sampling Points: 8
Run Stop Time: 20:30
Nozzle Murber:
.375
Pressures;
CP
Pilot Tut* Coef.:
0.840
Pbar
barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.600
Dia
Nozzle Diaaeter, in:
0.375
Pg
Flue Gas Static Press, in K20:
0.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
?s
Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg
29.600
vs
Flue Gas Velocity, F?/s«c:
26.3
Qsd
Volkmetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
6129.6
Moisture Data:
Qaw
Volunetrtc Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM:
14469.5
vie
Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
58.6
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
79.5
VM(std) Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
2.758
XH20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
5.34
VaKDry)
Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
53.443
XC02
Percent CO? by Volune, Dry:
6.50
VnKStd)
Volune Gas Metered, Std:
48.927
X02
Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
12.50
Mfd
Ory Mole Fraction:
0.947
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.29
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Md
Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
30.00
MS
Wet Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
29.36
U9
chrome 100.000ug
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Narber: rac-1
Dry Gas Meter Ctl. T: 1.034
leak Test Rate, CFM: 0.004
Meter Box dHa: 1.850
Assuned Moisture: 200.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 10.00
mg/dsan
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
Point
Nun
Sample
(rain)
Cry Gas
Meter Reading
(cu ft)
Delta P
fin H20)
Delta K
(in H20)
Gas Meter
Ten©
Stack
Te
-------
ISOKINETIC 8AMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULT8 TABULATION
Plant: Site9 Run
NO.
: IN-CR-3B Pate: 6/2/90
Sampling Location: inlet
Operator: mac
Net Run Time; 120 tnin
Run
Start Tine: 18:31
ISOKINETIC DATA
tiur Saopling Points: 8
Run
Stop Time: 20:31
Nozzle NuTber;
0
Pressures:
CP
P f tot Ti±* Coef.:
0.640
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Kg:
29.60C
Dia
Mozzle Diameter, in:
0.375
Pg Floe Gas Static Press, in K20:
0.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, 1n2:
1319.5
Pa Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
29.60C
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/scc:
26.3
Qsd
Volunetric Air Flou Rate, Dry SCFH:
6144.3
Moisture Data:
Gaw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFH:
14461.2
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, »l:
56.5
XI
isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
80.9
Vw(std) Vol one of Water Vapor, SCF:
2.659
XM20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
S.06
Vrr.(Ory)
Volune Cas Metered, Dry:
50.242
XC02 Percent C02 by Volume, Dry:
6.50
Vm(Std)
Volune Gas Metered, Std:
49.940
XC2 Percent C2 by Volune, Ory:
12.50
Mfd Dry Hole Fraction:
0.949
F© Orsat Validation Value: 1.29
Hd Estimated Dry Hoi. Ut. Lb/Lb-Hole: 50.00
Ks Wet Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Hole: 29.39
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Mutber: rac-5
Ory Gas Meter Cal. Y: 1.061
Leak Test Rate, CFM: 0.00S
Meter Box dHa: 1.869
Assmed Moisture: 200.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 10.00
U0
ng/dtctn
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
Point
Nun
Sample
T ime
(mini
Ory Gas
Meter Reading
Delta P
On H20)
Oelta H
< in H20)
Cas Meter
Te
Stack
Temo (oF)
ug
»g/dscm
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
1
0:01
330.014
0.100
0.560
127.0
800.0
Kg/hr
2
0:16
0.000
0.100
0.560
0.0
756.0
3
0:31
343.093
0.100
0.560
132.0
777.0
ug
4
0:46
349.762
0.100
0.560
0.0
757.0
mg/dscm
5
0:61
356.455
0.100
0.500
130.0
813.0
gr/dscm
6
0:76
363.181
0.100
0.500
130.0
611.0
Lb/hr
7
0:91
369.885
0.100
0.850
130.0
384.0
Kg/hr
8
1:06
379.883
0.100
0.600
135.0
760.0
9
120/OFf
380.256
10
••
••
-
••
••
••
11
--
-•
--
12
••
-•
••
13
--
--
-•
--
--
--
14
••
-
--
--
--
--
15
--
--
--
--
--
--
16
•*
••
-•
--
-~
--
17
--
--
--
-
--
--
18
--
--
--
--
--
--
19
~~
••
••
20
-•
--
-•
--
21
• -
-
• -
••
22
--
--
-•
--
23
--
••
-•
-•
••
-•
24
--
--
••
-*
--
-•
25
• •
-•
--
• •
--
• •
EMISSIONS RESULTS
chrome 100.000ug
Concentration, ng/tfsctn: 70.714x 10-3
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.031x 10*3
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 1.627* 10-3
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 0.738* 10*3
nickel 100.000ug
Concentration, mg/dsae: 70.714x 10-3
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.031x 10-3
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 1.627x 10-3
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 0.738x 10-3
netal 100.000ug
Concentration, mg/dsan: 70.714* 10-3
Concentration, gr/dsaa: 0.031* 10-3
Enisslon Rate,Lb/hr PfUtc: 1.627* 10-3
Emission Rete,Kg/hr PMRc: 0.738x 10*3
FIHAL/AVG 120
50.24?
0.100
0.586
98.0
707.2
C-9X
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULT8 TABULATION
Plant: Site9 Run
No.
: IN-CR-3C Date: 6/2/90
Sampling Location: inlet
Operator: hoc
Net Run Time: 120 nin
Run
Start Time: 18:32
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nun Sampling Points: 8
Run
Stop Tine: 20:32
Nozzle Nurtxr:
0
Pressures:
Cp
Pi tot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.600
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.375
Pg Flue Oas Static Press, in N20:
0.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps Absolute Flue Cas Press, in Hg:
29.600
Vs
Flue Cas Velocity, Ft/sec:
26.6
Qsd
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCfM:
5828.1
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFM:
14641.5
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
132.1
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
85.5
Vw(std) Volin* of Water Vapor, SCF:
6.218
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
11.05
Vn(Dry)
Volune Cas Metered, Dry:
54.657
XCD2 Percent C02 by Voline, Dry:
6.50
Va(Std)
Volune Cas Metered, Std:
50.052
X02 Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
12.50
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction:
0.889
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.29
Md Estimated Dry Mol. Vt, Lb/Lb-Hole: 30.00
Ms Wet Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mcle: 26.67
FIELD DATA
Meter 8ox Murker: rac-2
Dry Cas Meter Cal. Y: 1.006
leak lest Sate, CFM: 0.002
Meter lox due: 1.858
Assuaed Moisture: 200.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 10.00
Point
Hub
Sanple
Time
fin)
Dry Cas
Meter Reading
-------
Plant: sit69 Run
Ho.
: MID—CR6-3-A Oate:
6/2/50
Sampling Location: midpoint
Operator; g.c.b.
Net Run Time: 75 Bin
Rin
Start Tine: 5:33
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nin Sampling Points: 5
Run
Stop Time: 9:45
Nozzle Nuifeer:
t26
Pressures:
CP
Pitot Tube Coef.:
C.840
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.600
(>ia
Nozzle Diameter, in;
0.245
Pg Flue Cas Static Press, in H?0:
0.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1257.0
Ps Absolute Flue Cas Press, in Hg:
29.600
VS
Flu* Gas velocity. Ft/sec:
39.9
Qsd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
19518.4
Moisture Data:
Qaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM:
20878.2
Vic Vol. liquid Collected, ml:
33.;
XI
Isokinetic Sailing Rate, X:
82.5
Vu(std) Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
1.572
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
3.35
VnKOry)
Voluoe Gas Metered, Ory:
43.059
XC02 Percent C02 by Voluoe, Dry:
4.30
Vm(Std)
Voluae Gas Metered, Std:
45.296
X02 Percent 02 by Volume, Dry:
14.70
Mfd Ory Mole Fraction:
0.966
fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.44
Kd Estimated Ory Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
H& Wet Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.60
TIM D PftTft
Meter Box Nunber: a-1
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y: 1.131
leak Test Rate, CfH: 0.001
Meter Box dHa: 2.125
Assuned Moisture: 7.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 10.00
Point
Hub
Sample Dry Gas
Tiae Meter Reading
(mirO (cu ft)
Oelta P
(in H20)
Celta H
tfn H20)
Gas Meter
Teio (oF)
Stack
T«np (of)
1
0:00
937.942
o.soo
1.980
104.0
83.0
2
0:15
964.806
0.500
1.990
104.0
80.0
3
0:30
955.791
0.480
1.910
104.0
80.0
4 *
0:45
964.836
0.500
1.990
104.0
80.0
5
0:60
973.802
0.520
2.060
104.0
80.0
6
75/CFF
981.001
7
•
••
-¦
¦¦
-•
8
•
•-
-•
••
••
-•
9
-
--
-•
-~
-•
--
10
-
-
••
••
-•
-•
11
-•
-•
--
--
-•
••
12
-•
--
--
-•
--
13
-•
••
--
--
-
--
14
-•
-•
--
--
-•
--
15
••
••
••
••
••
••
16
--
••
--
--
--
17
••
--
••
--
--
••
18
--
••
••
--
••
••
19
--
••
••
--
••
••
20
--
-•
--
-•
21
--
--
-•
••
--
22
-•
--
--
--
••
23
--
-•
--
-•
--
24
--
-•
-•
--
-
25
••
-*
-•
FINAL/AVG
75
43.059
0.500
104.0
80.0
EMISSIONS RESULTS
us Cr*6 1.772 ug
ng/dsan Concentration, ng/dson: 1.382x 10*3
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.001x 10-3
Ib/hr Emission Rate,Ib/hr PMRc: 0.101x 10*3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 0.046x 10-3
ug Cr 15.082 us
ag/dscn Concentration, mg/dscm: 11.759x 10-3
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: O.OOSx 10-3
Ib/hr Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 0.860x 10*3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 0.393x 10*3
ug 0.000 ug
ng/dswn Concentration, ng/dscm: 0.000* 10-3
gr/dscm Concentration, gr/dscm: O.OOOx 10-3
c-ioo
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant;
site9 Run No.
: MID-CR6-3B Date: 6/2/90
Sampling Location: midpoint
Operator: g.c.b.
Met Run
Ti# (in H20) (in H20) Te«o (of) Ten© (oF5
Lb/hr Enisslon Rate,Lb/hr PMRc;
0.744X 10-3
1
0:02 720.220 0.490
1.500 104.0 80.0
Kg/hr Emission Rate.Sg/hr PMRc:
0.338x 10-3
2
0:17 730.411 0.480
1.750 104.0 60.0
3
0:32 740.696 0.480
1.750 104.0 80.0
ug 0.000 ug
4
0:47 751.062 0.500
1.750 104.0 80.0
mg/dscm Concentration, mg/dsat:
O.OOOx 10-3
5
0:62 761.262 0.S20
1.700 104.0 80.0
gr/dscm Concentration, gr/dscai:
O.OOOx 10-3
6 73/OFF 763.262
7
g
9
»C
1!
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
11
23
24
25
nHAL/AVG 73 48.042 0.494 1.690 104.C 80.0
C-101
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant:
site9 Run No.
: MID-CR6-3C Date: 6/2/90
Sampling Location: midpoint
Operator: g.c.b.
net Run
Time: 71 min Run
Start Time: 8:37
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nun Sampling Points: 5 Run
Stop Time: 9;45
hoztle Nuiber:
t29
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Pfcar
Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.600
Dia
Rozjle Diameter, in:
0.245
Pfl
Flee Gas Static Press, in H20:
0.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1257.0
Ps
Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hs:
29.600
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/scc:
40.1
Qsd
Volimetric Air Flow Rate, Ory SCfM:
18690.2
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rote, Uet ACFH:
20990.3
vie
Vol. Liquid collected, ml:
84.9
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
93.0
Vw(std)
Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
3.996
XH20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
7.95
VnKDry) Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
43.990
XC02
Percent C92 by Volur*, Dry:
4.30
Vm($td)
Volume Gas Metered, Std:
46.273
XD2
Percent 02 by Volune, Ory:
14.70
Mfd
Dry Mole Fraction:
0.921
To
Orsat Validation Value:
1.44
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Md
Estimated Dry Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
30.00
MS
uet Mol. Ut, lb/lb-Mole:
29.05
Ufi
Cm6 3.061
ug
riPED data
Meter Box Minber: b-1
Dry Gas Meter Cal. T: 1.131
Leek Test Rate. CFM: 0.001
Meter Box dNa: 2.125
Assuned Moisture: 7.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 10.00
mg/dscm Concentration, mg/dscn: 2.336k 10-3
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf; 0.001* 10*3
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 0.164x 10-3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 0.074* 10-3
Point
Nun
Sample
T in*
(rein}
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
leu ft)
Delta P
(in H20)
Delta K
Mr H20)
Gas Meter
Tefro (cF)
Stack
Temp (OF)
ug
mg/dscm
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Cr 16.202 us
Concentration, mg/dscr.: 12.365x
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.005x
Emission Rate.Lb/hr PMRc: 0.866x
1
0:04
134.612
0.500
1.980
104.0
80.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rete,Kg/hr PMRc:
C.393x
2
0:19
145.611
0.480
1.910
104.0
80.0
3
0:34
156.538
0.480
1.910
104.0
80.0
ug
0
.090 ug
4
0:49
167.508
0.500
1.980
104.0
80.0
ag/dsca
Concentration, mg/dscm:
O.OOOx
5
0:64
178.602
0.520
2.060
104.0
80.0
gr/dsca
Concentration, gr/dsan:
O.OOOx
6
71/OFF
178.602
FiHAL/AVG 71
43.990
0.496
1.966
104.0
C-102
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
plant: netco site9
Run
no.: 0UT-CR-3A
Date: 6/2/90
Sampling Location: outlet
Operator:
b.d.
ket Run Tine: 135 min
Run
Start Time: 7:33
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nun Sampling Points: 9
Run
Stop Time: 9:48
Nozzle Munbcr:
0
Pressures:
CP
Pitot Tube Coef.:
C.84C
Pear Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.6C0
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.250
Pg Flue Cas Static Press, in H20:
0.000
A
Stack/Duet Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps Absolute Flue Cas Press, in Hg:
29.600
Vs
flue Cas Velocity, Ft/sec:
37.9
Qsd
Volumetric Air flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
18353.5
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Volutnetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM:
: 20822.8
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, fit:
27.7
X!
Isokinetic Stapling Rate, X:
89.fi
Vw(std) Voluae of Water Vapor, SCf:
1.304
XK20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
1.55
Vm(Dry)
Voliaw Cas Metered, Dry:
86.606
XC02 Percent CO? by Volim, Dry:
4.30
Vm(Std)
Voluae Gas Metered, Std:
82.803
X02 Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
14.70
Mfd Dry Mole fraction:
0.984
Fo Oraat Validation Value: 1.44
Hd Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Hole: 30.00
Ms Wet Mol. Vt, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.61
rmp pm
Meter Box Umber: en-2
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y: 1.015
Leak Test Kate. CM: 0.001
Meter Box dKa: 1.985
Assumed Moisture: 7.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 15.00
Point
Nun
Sanple
Tifie
Dry Cos
Neter Reading
OaUa P
Delta K Gas Meter
Stack
Tern? (oF)
1
7:33
618.307
0.420
1.500
61.0
123.0
2
7:48
628.002
0.360
1.200
64.0
128.0
3
8:03
637.000
0.400
1.200
90.0
125.0
4
8:18
646.002
0.430
1.500
97.0
120.0
5
8:33
655.835
0.430
1.400
100.0
123.0
6
8:48
665.668
0.440
1.400
103.0
125.0
7
9:03
675.468
0.430
1.400
104.0
123.0
6
9:18
685.000
0.440
1.300
104.0
124.0
9
9:33
694.697
0.440
1.400
104.0
120.0
10
135/OFF
704.913
11
-
--
--
--
--
12
--
-
-•
••
•-
13
• •
--
--
-•
--
14
-•
--
--
15
-
-~
••
--
--
16
••
--
--
•-
17
••
-•
••
--
--
18
••
--
--
-
-•
19
-•
-
-•
--
--
20
--
-•
--
--
--
21
-•
-~
-•
--
••
22
--
~*
--
--
--
23
-•
-•
••
-
-
24
••
--
--
--
--
25
"
--
••
FINAL/AVC
135
86.606
0.421
1.344
96.3
123.4
EMISSIONS RESULT8
ug chrome 100.000ug
mg/dsan Concentration, ng/dsan: 42.649x 10-3
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.Q19x 10-3
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMftc: 2.932x 10-3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.330* 10-3
ug nickel 100.000ug
¦g/dscm Concentre?ion, mg/dscnr. 42.649* 10-3
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.019x 10-3
Lb/hr Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMftc: 2.932x 10-3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.330x10*3
ug metal 100.000ug
mg/dsca Concentration, ng/dscn: 42.649x 10-3
gr/dsoi Concentration, gr/dsan: 0.019x 10-3
Lb/hr Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMftc: 2.932x 10-3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.330x 10-3
C-103
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
piar.t*. netco site9
Sanpling Location: outlet
Net Run Time: 135 min
bos Sampling Points: 9
Ren No.: OUT-CR-3B
Operator: b.
Run Start Time: 7:34
Run Stop Time: 9:49
Date: 6/2/90
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle Nurber:
0
Pressures:
CP
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.&40
Pbar
Barometric Pressure, in Kg:
29.600
Oia
Nozzle Diaaeter, in
0.250
Pfl
Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
0.000
A
Stack/Ouct Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps
Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Kg:
29.600
vs
Flue Cas Velocity,
Ft/sec:
36.2
Osd
Voluaetric Air Flow
Rate,
Dry SCFM: 18566.4
Moisture Data:
Qaw
Voluaetric Air Flow Rate,
Wet ACFM: 20996.4
V'.C
Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
23.1
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,
X: 86.8
Vw(std)
Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
1.087
XH20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
1.33
Vm(Dry) Volune Cas Metered,
Ory:
92.645
XC02
Percent C02 by Volune, Ory:
4.30
Vm(Std) Volune Cas Metered,
Std:
80.949
X02
Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
14.70
Mfd
Ory Mole Fraction:
0.967
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.44
EMISSIONS
RESULTS
Md
Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Hole:
30.00
MS
Wet Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
29.84
ug
chrome
100.000ug
Meter Box Kunber:
Ory Gas Meter Cal. Y:
Leak Test Rate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
en- 1
C.932
0.001
Meter Box due: 1.934
Assumed Moisture: 7.00
Leak Test vac, in Hg: 15.00
mg/asc®
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
Point
Nun
Sample
Time
<«in)
Ory Gas
Meter Reading
Ccu ft)
Delta P
(in H20)
Delta H
(in H20)
Gas Meter
Terp (oF)
Stack
Tero (oF)
ug
mg/dsca
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
1
7:34
863.655
0.440
1.20C
84.0
123.0
Kg/hr
2
7:49
873.792
0.370
1.200
85.0
126.0
3
8:04
863.585
0.420
1.300
94.0
121.0
ug
»
8:19
893.328
0.450
1.400
99.0
121.0
mg/dscm
5
8:34
903.135
0.430
1.400
103.0
123.0
gr/dsca
6
8:49
914.185
0.430
1.400
10S.O
124.0
Lb/hr
7
9:04
924.668
0.430
1.400
107.0
124.0
Kg/hr
5
9:19
934.052
0.450
1.400
107.0
124.0
9
9:34
945.400
0.440
1.400
108.0
120.0
10
135/OfF
956.300
11
-•
--
--
--
—
12
••
--
--
-•
--
13
-•
-
••
--
14
--
--
• •
--
15
-•
-
•-
•-
16
• •
-
-•
--
17
*•
--
--
18
• •
••
••
••
19
• •
--
••
--
20
--
--
--
-•
21
-•
••
--
--
22
--
••
23
--
-
-•
--
24
--
--
--
--
25
**
FUAL/AVG
135
9?.645
0.429
1.344
99.1
122.9
Concentration, a^/dscm: 43.626* 1C-3
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.019* 1C-3
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 3.033* 10-3
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.376* 10-3
nickel 100.000ufi
Concentration, mj/dscm: 43.626* 10-3
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.019x 10-3
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PHRc: 3.033* 10*3
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.376x 10-3
metal 100.000ug
Concentration, mg/dsca: 43.626* 10-3
Concentration, gr/dsan: 0.019* 10-3
Enission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 3.033* 10-3
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.376* 10-3
C-104
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: site9
Sarrplir>$ Location: outlet
Run No.: OUT-CR-3C Date: 6/2/90
Operator: b.d.
Met Run Tiae: 135 nin
Run Start Ti®e: 7:35
ISOKINETIC DATA
Hum Sampling Points: 9
Run Stop lime: 9:50
Nozzle Nurber:
0
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef
0.640
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.600
Die
Nozzle Diameter, in*.
0.250
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
0.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
*319.5
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg
: 29.600
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
36.1
Qsd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCfM;
16308.2
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Voluaetric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFM:
20966.5
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, nl:
47.8
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
92.5
Vu(std) Voluae of Water Vapor, SCF:
2.250
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
2.58
Vn(Ory) Volune Cas Metered, Dry:
92.006
XCC2 Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
4.30
Vm(Std) Volune Gas Metered, Std:
85.030
X02 Percent 02 by Voluae, Dry:
14.70
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction:
0.974
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.44
Md Estimated Dry Nol. Wt. Lb/lb-Mote: 30.00
Ms Uct Hoi. Vt, Lb/Lb-Hole: 29.69
Meter Box Nurber:
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y:
Leak Test Kate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
n-16
0.996
0.001
Meter Box
Teno (of)
tmd (on
1
7:35
127.630
0.420
1.200
63.0
123.0
2
7:50
137.862
0.370
1.200
84.0
125.0
3
6:05
147.355
0.430
1.300
97.0
121.0
4
6:20
157.185
0.450
1.400
104.0
121.0
5
8:35
167.500
0.430
1.400
110.0
123.0
6
8:50
177.978
0.430
1.400
111.0
124.0
7
9:05
188.350
0.430
1.400
117.0
125.0
8
9:20
198.453
0.430
1.400
117.0
124.0
9
9:35
208.995
0.440
1.400
117.0
119.0
10
135/OFF
219.836
11
-•
••
-
••
••
--
12
--
--
--
--
--
13
--
-
-
-
••
••
14
-•
--
--
--
--
15
••
••
--
-
••
••
16
*•
*~
••
••
*-
17
--
--
--
--
--
--
18
••
••
-
--
--
19
••
••
--
--
••
-
20
••
-
--
-
--
--
21
••
--
-•
-•
--
--
22
-
•-
--
-
••
••
23
-
-•
••
-
••
--
24
••
*~
~~
--
--
--
25
--
--
••
FINAL/AVG
135
92.006
0.425
1.344
104.4
122.8
EMISSIONS RESULTS
ug chrone 100.000ug
¦O/dsem Concentration, mg/dsca: 41.532* 10*3
gr/dtcf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.010* 10*3
Lb/hr Enitslon Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 2.846x 10-3
Kg/hr Enicsion Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.292* 10-3
ug nickel 100.000ug
ng/dson Concentration, mg/dscn: 41.532x 10-3
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.016* 10-3
Lb/hr Eanssion Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 2.648* 10-3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.292* 10-3
ug netal 100.000jg
ng/dsan Concentration, ng/d&ca: 41.532* 10*3
gr/dscm Concentration, gr/dsca: 0.018* 10-3
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 2.848* 10-3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.292* 10-3
C-105
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: site9
Sampling Location: outlet
Run No.: OUT-CR-3C Date: 6/2/90
Operator: b.d.
Net Run lime: 135 rr.in
Run Start Time: 7:35
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nun Sampling Points: 9
Run Stop Time: 9:50
Nozzle Nisrber:
0
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.6C0
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, ir:
0.250
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
o.ooc
A
Stock/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
29.600
vs
Flue Cas Velocity, Ft/sec:
38.1
Qsd
Volinetrlc Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
18308-2
Moisture Data:
Qaw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM:
20966.5
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
47.8
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
92.5
Vw(std) Volurie of Water Vapor, SCF:
2.250
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
2.58
Vm(Ory) Volume Gas Metered, Dry:
92.003
XCC2 Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
4.30
Vm(Std)
Voline Cas Metered, Std:
85.030
X02 Percent 02 by VoIuk. Dry:
14.70
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction:
0.974
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.44
Md Estimated Dry Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms Uet Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.69
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Mutter: n-16
Dry Cas Meter Cal. Y: 0.996
Leak Test Rate, CFM: 0.001
Meter Box dHa: 1.762
Assuned Moisture: 7.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 15.00
Sample
Dry Gas
Point
Time
Meter Reading
Delta P
Delta H
Gas Meter
Stack
Hum
fmin)
feu ft>
(in H201
(in H20)
Te«D (oF)
Tero (oF)
1
7:35
127.830
0.420
1.200
83.0
123.0
2
7:50
137.862
0.370
1.200
84.0
125.0
3
8:05
147.355
0.430
1.300
97.0
121.0
4
8:20
157.185
0.450
1.400
104.0
121.0
5
8:35
167.500
0.430
1.400
110.0
123.0
6
8-.S0
177.978
0.430
1.400
111-0
124.0
7
9:05
188.350
0.430
1.400
117.0
125.0
8
9:20
198.453
0.430
1.400
117.0
124.0
9
9:35
208.995
0.440
1.400
117.0
119.0
10
135/OFf
219.838
11
••
--
*•
--
••
12
-
-•
~-
--
--
13
-
••
--
••
-•
14
--
--
--
••
--
15
-•
~~
--
--
-~
16
••
--
--
••
17
••
-
-
••
18
--
•-
--
-•
19
-•
••
••
--
••
20
--
* ••
--
--
21
••
••
--
-
•-
22
••
~~
-
23
--
-•
-¦
--
--
24
••
••
-
-•
••
25
••
F1NAL/AVG
115
92.008
0.425
1.344
104.4
122.8
EMISSIONS RESULT8
ug chrome 100.000ug
mg/dscm Concentration, «g/dsc»: 41.532* 10-5
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.018x 10-3
Ib/hr Emission Rate,Ib/hr PMRc: 2.848k 10-3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.292* 10*3
ug nickel 100.000ug
mg/dscm Concentration, mg/dscm: 41.532x 10-3
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.018x 10-3
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 2.848x 10-3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.292x 10-3
ug metal 100.000ug
mg/dsco Concentration, mg/dsc»: 41.532x 10*3
gr/dsco Concentration, gr/dscm: 0.018x 10-3
Lb/hr Emission Kat«,Lb/hr PMRc: 2.848x 10-3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.292* 10-3
C-106
-------
ISOKINETIC
SAMPLING TRAIN
FIELD DATA AND
RESULTS TABULATION
Plant:
Slt69 Run No.
: OUT-CR-3D
Oate: 6/2/90
Sampling Location: outlet
Operator: b.d.
Net Run
Tina: 135 min
Rin
Start Time: 7:36
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nura Swpling Points: 8
Rtn
Stop Time: 9:51
Nozzle Nurber:
0
Pressures:
CP
Pi tot Tube Coef.t
0.840
Pbar
Barometric Pressure, in Kg:
29.600
Die
Nozzle Diaaater, in:
0.250
Pfl
Flue Cas Static Press, in H?0:
0.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps
Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg
29.600
Vs
Flue Cas Velocity, Ft/sec:
38.1
Qsd
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Ory SCFM:
18518.1
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Voluoctric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFM:
20936.3
vie
Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
20.6
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
87.7
Vw(std)
Vol Line of Uater Vapor, SCF:
0.970
Xx20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
1.18
Vm(Dry)
Vol use Cas Metered, Ory:
90.388
XC02
Percent C02 by VoIuk, Ory:
4.30
Vm(Std)
Volmc Cas Metered, Std:
81.549
X02
Percent 02 by Voluwe, Dry:
14.70
Mfd
Dry Mole Fraction:
0.988
fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.44
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Md
Estimated Ory Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
30.00
MS
Wet Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
29.86
ug
chrome 100.000ug
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Nurfccr: nu-7
Ory Cas Mater Cal. T: 0.969
Leak. Test Rote, CfM: 0.001
Meter Box dHa: 1.887
Assured Moisture: 7.00
Leak Test Vac, In Hg: 15.00
ng/dscrn
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
Point
Hum
Sarple
Time
(mini
Ory Gas
Meter Reading
feu ft>
Delta P
fin H20)
Delta N
(in K201
Cas Meter
Tero (oF)
Stack
Tero (OF)
"9
¦g/dscm
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
1
7.36
859.420
0.430
1.200
86.0
123.0
Kg/hr
2
7:51
869.304
0.370
1.200
67.0
126.0
3
8:06
878.643
0.400
1.200
97.0
123.0
U9
4
8:21
889.312
0.440
1.400
104.0
121.0
¦g/dsan
5
8.36
899.937
0.4S0
1.400
108.0
123.0
gr/dsoa
6
8:51
908.683
0.440
1.400
112.0
125.0
Lb/hr
7
9:06
918.743
0.430
1.400
114.0
126.0
Kg/hr
8
9:21
928.613
0.450
1.400
115.0
122.0
9
135/OfF
949.808
10
••
--
••
• -
• •
11
--
--
--
~~
12
-•
• •
• •
-
13
--
• •
...
--
--
14
--
--
-•
--
•-
15
••
-
--
-
16
-~
--
••
-¦
17
-
--
-
--
...
16
--
-•
-•
••
19
••
--
•-
••
--
20
--
--
••
--
21
••
--
--
-•
--
22
•-
--
--
--
-
23
••
--
--
--
--
24
--
—
--
••
-
25
--
FINAL/AVC
135
90.388
0.426
1.325
102.9
123.6
Concentration, ng/dsob: 43.305a 10-3
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.019* 10-3
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 3.003* 10-3
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.362* 10*3
nickel 100.000ug
Concentration, mg/dscm: 43.305* 10-3
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.019* 10-3
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 3.003* 10-3
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.362x 10-3
metal 100.000ug
Concentration, ng/dsan: 43.305* 10*3
Concentration, gr/dscm: 0.019* 10-3
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 3.003* 10-3
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.362* 10-3
C-107
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site9
Sapling Location: Outlet
tiet Run Tiae: 135 min
Nun Sampling Points: 9
Run No.: OUT-CR-3A Date: 6/2/90
Operator: SD
Run Start Time: 1933
Run Stop T ifce: 2148
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Kg:
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
Ps Absolute Flue Cas Press, in Kg:
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, el:
Vw(std) Vol one of Uater Vapor, SCF:
29.600
0.000
29.600
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
XC02 Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
502 Percent 02 by Voiuae, Dry:
Mfd Dry Kole Fraction:
Fo Orsat Validation Value:
Md Estimated Dry Mol. Wt, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms Uet Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.81
27.7
1.304
1.55
5.00
14.00
0.984
1.38
ISOKINETIC
DATA
Nozzle Nurber:
Cp
Pitct Tube Coef.:
0.840
Dia
Nozzle Diaacter, in:
0.250
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Vs
Flue Cas Velocity, Ft/sec
37.9
Qsd
Volumetric Air Flow Rate,
pry SCFM:
18353.5
Oaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rote,
Uet ACFM:
20822.8
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,
X:
89.8
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Hunoer: Ew-2
Dry Cas Meter Cel. Y: 1.015
Leak Test Rate, CFM: 0.001
Meter Box dHa: 1.985
Assrncd Moisture: 7.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 15.00
FltiAL/AVG 135
Vrt(Ory) Volune Cas Metered, Dry;
Vn(Std) Volune Cas Metered, Std:
EMISSIONS RESULTS
86.606
82.807
ug
ng/dscfl
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
Point
Uun
Sample
Time
(min)
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
plant: netco sit©9
Sampling location: outlet
Net Run Tine: 135 min
Win Sampling Points: 9
Run No.: OUT~CR—3B
Operator: b.
Run Start Tine: 7:34
Rin Stop Tine: 9:49
Date: 6/2/90
d.
ISOKINETIC DATA
Mczzle Njnber:
0
Pressures:
CP
Pi to: Tube Coef.:
C.840
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.600
Cia
Hcz?le Diameter, in:
0.250
Fvue Gas Static Press, in H20:
0.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2;
1319.5
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, ii Hg:
29.600
Vs
Flue Gas velocity. Ft/sec:
38.2
Qsd
Voluoetric Air Floy Rate,
Dry SCFM: 18566.4
Moisture Data:
Qeu
Voluoetric Air Flow Rate,
Wet ACFM: 20996.4
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
23.1
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,
X: 86.8
Vw(std) Voltne of Water Vapor, SCF:
1.087
XX20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
1.53
Vm(Dry) Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
92.645
XC02 Percent CC2 by Volune, Dry:
4.30
VmJStd)
Volune Gas Metered, Std:
00.949
X02 Percent 02 by Vol one. Dry:
14.70
Mfd Dry Mole fraction:
0.987
Fc Or&at Validation Value: 1.44
He Estimated Dry Mol. UT, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms Vet Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.84
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Nurber: er*1
Dry Gas Heter Cal. Y; 0.952
Leak Test Rate. CFM: 0.001
Meter (ox dHa:
Assuned Moisture:
Leak Test Vac, in Hg:
1.934
7.00
15.00
Point
Nun
Sacnple
Tin*
(min^
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
(cu fO
Delta P
(in N2C>
Delta H
(in M20)
Gas Meter
Temo (oF)
Stack
Tbwd (OF)
1
7:34
863.655
0.440
1.2C0
84.0
123.0
2
7:49
873.792
0.370
1.200
85.0
126.0
3
8:04
883.S85
0.420
1.300
94.0
121.0
4
8:19
893.328
0.450
1.400
99.0
121.0
5
8:34
903.135
0.430
1.400
103.0
123.0
6
8:49
914.185
0.430
1.400
105.0
124.0
7
9:04
924.668
0.430
1.400
107.0
124.0
8
9:19
934.052
0.450
1.400
107.0
124.0
9
9:34
945.400
0.440
1.400
108.0
120.0
10
135/OFF
956.300
11
--
--
-•
-
--
--
12
-•
--
--
--
--
--
13
-•
~
-•
--
14
-•
-•
• •
-•
-•
--
15
••
--
• •
--
--
16
-•
-•
•-
--
••
17
••
-•
-
-
«•
18
-•
--
--
--
-•
--
19
-
--
--
--
--
20
-•
--
--
--
-•
--
21
--
--
--
-•
--
22
••
• •
..
• •
• •
• •
23
--
-
--
--
• -
-
24
-•
--
• -
--
--
25
--
--
-*
*•
FIHAL/AVC
135
92.645
0.429
1.344
99.1
122.9
EMISSIONS RESULT8
ug Cr»6 1.722 ug
•g/dscm Concentration, mg/dscm: 0.751* 10*3
gr/dsef Concentration, gr/dsef: O.OOOx 10*3
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 0.052x 10-3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 0.024x 10-3
US Cr 9.140 ug
mg/dscm Concentration, ng/dscn: 5.987* 10*3
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.002x 10-3
Lb/hr Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 0.277* 10*3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 0.126x 10-3
ug 0.000 ug
ng/dscn Concentration, ag/dscm: O.OOOx 10*3
gr/dscm Concentration, gr/dscm: O.OOOx tO-3
Ib/Kr Emission Sate,Lb/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10-3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10*3
C-109
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: site9
Sanpling Location: outlet
Net Run Time: 135 ain
Nun $*nplir>0 Points: 9
Rin NO.; OUT-CR-3C Oate: 6/2/90
Operator: b.d.
Run Start Time: 7:35
Run Step Time: 9:50
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle Nuriter:
0
Pressures;
CP
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Pbar
Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.600
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.250
^9
Flue Gas Static Press, in K20:
O.COO
A
$tack/Cuct Area, ir»2:
1319.5
Ps
Absolute Flue Cas Press, in Hg:
29.600
Vs
Flue Cas Velocity, Ft/sec:
38.1
Qsd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Dry SCfM: 18308.2
Moisture Data:
Qaw
Volonetric Air Flow Rate,
Uet ACFK: 20966.5
Vic
Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
47.8
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,
X: 92.5
Vw(std> Volume of Water Vapor, SCr:
2.250
XK20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
2.S8
VoKOry)
Volume Cas Metered, Dry:
92.038
XC02
Percent CC2 by Voluae, Dry:
4.30
1
a
Volume Gas Metered, Std:
85.030
X02
Percent 02 by Volunc, Ory:
14.70
Mfd
Dry Mole Fraction:
0.974
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.44
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Md
Estimated Dry Mol. Wt, Lb/Lb-Mole:
30.00
MS
Vet Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
29.69
Cr*6
1.577 us
Meter Box timber:
Dry &as Meter Cal. Y:
Leak Test Rate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
n-16
0.996
0.001
Point
Saaple
Tine
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
Delta P
Meter Box dHa: 1.762
Assuned Moisture: 7.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 15.00
Delta H Cas Meter Stack
mg/dscm
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
ug
•g/dsctn
fir/dscf
Concentration, mg/dscn: 0.655* 10-3
Concentration, gr/dscf; O.OOOx 10-3
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 0.045x 10-3
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 0.020k 10-3
Cr
Concentration, cng/dscm:
Concentration, gr/dsef:
7.622 ug
3.166x 10-3
0.001x 10-3
V'wfT.
(fin)
(cu m
(in H2JN
<
H2C)
Ten© (oF>
TtflO (0F>
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc
0.217*
1
7:35
127.830
0.420
1
200
83.0
123.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc
0.098x
2
7:50
137.862
0.370
1
200
84.0
125.0
3
8:05
147.355
0.430
1
300
97.0
121.0
ug
0
00C ug
4
8:20
157.185
0.450
1
00
104.0
121.0
mg/dscm
Concentration, ng/dsca:
O.OOOx
5
8:35
167.500
0.430
1
00
110.0
123.0
gr/dscm
Concentration, gr/dsan:
O.OOOx
6
8:50
177.978
0.430
1
00
111.0
124.0
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc
O.OOOx
7
9:0>
168.350
0.430
1
00
117.0
125.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc
O.OOOx
8
9:20
198.453
0.430
1
00
117.0
124.0
9
9:35
208.995
0.440
1
00
117.0
119.0
10
135/OFf
219.838
11
••
--
••
•
••
12
• •
*•
--
•
--
13
-•
••
--
~
--
14
-
--
--
-
--
15
--
--
-•
16
• •
••
••
•
••
17
--
-•
--
•
••
18
••
~~
•
••
19
--
--
••
20
•-
~~
--
-
••
21
••
--
--
-
22
--
-
-
-
••
23
—
-•
•-
•
•-
24
--
--
--
-
--
25
--
*
--
FINAl/AVC
135
92.008
0.425
1.344
104.4
122.8
C-110
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site9
Saffpl1r.fi Location: Midpoint
Net Run Tine: 120 min
Nun Swipling Points: 8
Run No.: MID—CR-5A Date: 6-3*90
Operator: GV
Run Start Time: 1447
Run Stop Time: 1647
ISOKINETIC DATA
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
Pg Flue Cas Static Press, in K20:
Ps Absolute Flue Cas Press, in Hg:
Moisture Data:
29.490
•30.000
27.284
Vic
Vol. Liouid Collected, ml:
46.3
Vw(std)
Voluae of Water Vapor, SCF:
2.179
XM20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
4.35
XC02
Percent C02 by Voluae, Ory:
4.70
XC2
Percent 02 by Volume, Dry:
13.71
Mfd
Dry Mole Fraction:
0.956
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.53
Md
Estfnated Ory Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
30.00
Ms
Uet Mol. Wt, Lb/Lb-Mole:
29.48
Nozzle Umber:
t-28
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.245
A
Stack/Duct Area, ln2;
1319.5
Vs
Flue Cas Velocity, Ft/sec:
34.2
Qsd
Volumetric Air Flow Rate,
Dry SCFM:
15991.9
Oaw
volunetric Air Flow Rate.
Uet ACFM:
18786.1
%l
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,
X:
69.9
Vm(Ory) Volume G«s Metered, Dry:
Vm(Std) voluae Cas Metered, Std:
52.180
47.906
Meter Box Nutber:
Ory Cas Meter C«l. Y:
Leak Test Rate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
A1 Meter 8ox dKa: 2.270
0.986 Assured Moisture: 8.00
0.001 Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 10.00
mg/dscm
gr/dscf
lb/hr
Kg/hr
Point
Nun
Saocle
Time
(min)
Dry Cas
Meter Reeding
(cu ft)
Delta P
(in H20)
Delta K
(in H20)
Gas Meter
Tamo foF)
Stack
Ten© (oF)
ug
mg/dscm
gr/dscf
lb/hr
1
0
984.432
0.360
1.200
100.0
75.0
Kg/hr
2
15
992.728
0.360
1.150
100.0
75.0
3
30
1000.374
0.320
0.900
100..0
62.0
ug
4
45
107.009
0.360
0.600
100.0
89.0
ng/dscm
5
60
10312.930
0.320
0.600
100.0
78.0
gr/dscm
6
75
1018.588
0.360
0.600
100.0
81.0
Lb/hr
7
90
1023.743
0.360
0.500
100.0
84.0
Kg/hr
8
105
1028.372
C.260
0.400
100.0
84.0
9
120/OFF
1036.612
10
-•
--
--
-•
11
--
-•
• •
-•
--
--
12
••
--
--
13
••
•-
-•
••
-
--
14
--
--
--
--
15
--
--
-~
-•
16
••
-•
••
"
--
17
--
--
-•
--
--
18
••
• •
--
-•
19
--
-•
--
20
• •
..
••
21
• •
• -
22
••
••
••
••
••
23
--
••
-
--
--
24
--
--
-•
--
--
--
25
--
--
--
..
--
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Cr*6 3.330 ug
Concentration, mg/dscm: 2.455* 10-3
Concentration, gr/dscf: O.OOIx 10-3
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 0.147x 10-3
Emission Ratc,Kg/hr PKRc: 0.067* 10-3
Cr 23.343 ug
Concentration, mg/dscm: 17.208* 10-3
Concentration, or/dsef: 0.008* 10-3
Emission Rate,lb/hr PHRc: 1.031* 10-3
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 0.467x 10-3
0.000 ug
Concentration, mg/dscm: O.OOOx 10-3
Concentration, gr/dscm: O.OOOx 10-3
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10-3
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PHRc: O.OOOx 10*3
F1NAL/AVC 120
52-180
0.337
0.744
100.0
_&Iifi
C-lll
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AMD RESULTS TABULATION
p.ant: Site 9
Sorplirtg Location: Midpoint
Net Run Time: 122 Bin
Nun Sampling Points: 8
Run No.: MID—CR—5B Date: 6-3*90
Operator: CB
Run Start Tine: 1449
Run Stop Time: 1649
ISOKINETIC DATA
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, ir. Hg: 29.490
PS Floe Gas Static Press, in H20: *50.000
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Ng: 27.254
Moisture Data:
vie Vol. Liquid Collected, nl: 70.9
Vw(std) Volune of Water Vapor, SCF: 3.337
XK20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.: 4.66
XC02 Percent C02 by Volune, Ory: 4.70
X02 Percent 02 by Volune, Ory: 15.00
Hid Ory Mole Fraction: 0.953
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.26
Md Estimated Ory Mol. Ut, Lb/lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms uet Mol. Wt, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.44
Nozzle Murfccr:
t-27
Cp
Pi tot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.245
A
Stack/Duct Area, ln2;
1319.5
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
33.8
Qsd
Volumetric Air Flow Rate,
Ory SCFM:
15763.3
Oau
Volumetric Air Floy Rate,
Uet ACFH:
18564.S
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,
X:
99.4
Vm(Dry)
Voluae Gas Metered, Dry:
71.513
Vm(Std)
Volune Gas Metered, Std:
68.270
Meter Box Nifrt*r:
Dry Gas Mettr Cat. T:
leak Test Rate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
A2 Meter Box dHa: 2.047
1.024 Assured Moisture: 8.00
0.002 Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 10.00
Sample
Dry Gas
Point
Time
Meter Reading
Delta P
Nun
(min)
(cu -ft)
(in H20)
1
0
773.526
0.360
2
15
783.382
0.360
3
30
792.912
0.250
4
45
800.791
0.360
5
60
809.892
0.320
6
75
818.881
0.360
7
90
827.861
0.360
8
105
836.722
0.270
9
122/OFF
845.C39
10
--
--
—
11
—
--
—
12
••
—
--
13
—
—
--
14
--
--
-•
15
-
••
16
--
-•
--
17
--
*•
-
18
--
--
19
-•
••
••
20
--
--
-•
21
••
--
22
-•
--
--
23
--
--
24
--
• •
-•
25
-•
..
--
Delta K
fin H20)
Gas Meter
Tfrrp (of )
Stack
Tewp (oF)
1.500
1.500
1.000
1.400
1.300
1.500
1.300
1.100
us
eig/dsan
gr/dsc1
Ib/hr
Kfl/hr
ug
¦g/dsan
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
100.0
76
0
Kg/hr
100.0
75
0
100.0
83
0
100.0
84
0
mg/dscm
100.0
79
0
gr/dson
100.0
81
0
Lb/hr
100.0
81
0
Kg/hr
100.0
86
0
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Cr*6 1.082 U9
Concentration, mg/dsan: 0.560x 10-3
Concentration, gr/dscf: O.OOOx 10-3
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 0.033* 10-3
Emission Rate.lCg/hr pHRc: 0.015* 10*3
Cr 29.380 ug
Concertration, ng/dsca: 15.198x 10-3
Concert rat ion, gr/dscf: 0.007x 10-3
Emission Rate,Lb/hr pMRc: 0.897* 1C-3
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 0.407x 10-3
0.000 ug
Concentration, mg/dscm: O.OOOx 1C-3
Concertration, gr/dscm: O.OOOx 10-3
Emission Rate,lb/hr PHRc: O.OOOx 10*3
Emission ftate,Kg/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10-3
F1NAL/AVG 122
71.513
0.329
1-325
100.0
C-112
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Midpoint
Net Run T ime: 120 min
bur Sampling Points: 8
Run Mo.: MID-CR-5C Date: 6-3-90
Operator: GB
Run Start Time: 1451
Run Stop Time: 1651
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle Nutrber:
t-30
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Til* Coef.:
0.840
Poar
Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.490
Die
nozzle Diameter, in:
0.2*5
P9
Flue Gas Static Press, in H20;
•30.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps
Absolute Flue Gas Press. In Kg:
27.284
vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec;
33.8
Osd
Volumetric Air Flow Sate,
Dry SCFM: 15606.9
Moisture Data;
Qaw
Volumetric Air flow Rate,
Wet ACFM; 18573.6
Vic
Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
88.6
XI
Isokinetic Saqpling Rate,
X: 105.8
Vh(std) Voluae of Water Vapor, SCF:
4.170
1X20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
5-56
Vm{0ry> Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
73.446
XC02
Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
4.50
vm(Std) Volume Gas Metered, Std:
70.775
802
Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
15.00
Mfd
Dry Mole Fraction;
0.944
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.31
EMISSION8 RESULTS
Hd
Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
30.00
Ms
Wet Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
29.33
Ufl
Cr*6
2.816 ug
Meter Box Nutter:
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y:
Leak Test Rate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
B1 Meter Box dHa: 2.004
1.034 Assuned Moisture: 8.00
0.001 Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 10.00
mg/dsan Concentration, mg/dscm: 1.405x 10-3
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dsef: O.OOIx 10-3
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PHRc: 0.082x 10-3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PHRc: 0.037x 10-3
Point
Win
Sanple
Tine
(min)
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
(cu ft)
Delta P
(in H20)
Delta H
(in H?0)
Gas Meter
Terr (cF)
Stack
Tenc (oF)
US
mg/dscm
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Cr 30.677 ug
Concentration, mg/dscm: 15.306*
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.007x
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 0.895x
1
0
190.972
0.360
1.500
100.0
76.0
Kg/hr
Eaission Rate,Kg/hr PHRc: 0.406*
Z
15
200.957
0.560
1.500
100.0
75.0
3
30
210.424
0.2SO
1.000
100.0
83.0
U9
0.000 ug
4
45
218.502
0.360
1.500
100.0
81.0
irg/dscti
Concentration, mg/dscm: O.OOOx
5
60
228.S02
0.320
1.300
100.0
81.0
gr/dscm
Concentration, gr/dscm: O.OOOx
6
75
232.082
0.350
1.500
100.0
82.0
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: O.OOOx
7
90
246.691
0.360
1.500
100.0
84.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: O.OOOx
8
105
256.352
0.270
1.100
100.C
87.0
9
120/OFF
264.418
10
--
--
--
-•
11
••
••
--
-•
••
12
-•
--
--
--
13
--
--
--
• •
14
••
--
..
15
--
--
--
16
••
•-
-
..
..
17
..
--
--
--
18
..
--
..
--
19
..
• -
--
--
--
20
••
--
-
--
--
21
--
--
--
--
--
22
••
••
--
--
--
23
--
--
--
--
24
••
--
--
--
--
25
--
FINAL/AVG
120
73.446
0.327
1.362
100.0
81.1
C-113
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Outlet
Run No.: OUT-CR-5^ Date: 6-3-90
Operator: RM
Net Run Time: 120 min
Run Start Time: 1455
ISOKINETIC DATA
nut SwTpliog Points: 8
Run Stop Time: 1655
Nozzle Nurber:
pressures:
CP
Pitot Tube Coe'.:
0.840
?bar Barcowtric Pressure, in Kg:
29.490
Oia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.250
?g Flue Gas Static Press, in K20:
0.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg
: 29.490
vs
Flue Cas Velocity, ft/sec:
36.6
Osd
Volunetric Air Flow Sate, Dry SCFM:
16849.7
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFM:
20095.6
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
65.3
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
91.0
Vw(std) Volme of Water Vapor, SCF:
3.074
XH2Q Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
4.30
Vn(Ory) Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
73.230
XC02 Percent CC2 by Volune, Dry:
4.50
Vn(std)
Volune Cas Metered, Std:
68.468
X02 Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
15.00
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction:
0.957
To Orsat Validation Value: 1.31
Md Estimated Ory Mol. Wt, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms Yet Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.46
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Umber: En2
Dry Gas Meter Cat. T: 0.965
Leak Test Rate, CFM: 0.00G
Meter Box dKa: 1.985
Attuned Moisture: 3.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 15.00
ug
mg/dscm
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Cr*6
1.866 us
Concentration, mg/dscn: 0.973k 10-3
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.000* 10-3
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: C.061x 10*3
Emission Rate.Kg/hr PMRc: C.028x 10-3
ug
Cr 65
636 uy
Saople
Dry Gas
mg/dscm
Concentration, mg/dscm:
33.654x
Point
Tib*
Meter Reading
Delta P
Oelta N
Cas Meter
Stack
gr/dscf
Concentration, gr/dscf:
0.015x
Nlti
(mini
Teoc (oF)
Te
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc:
2.136X
1
0
711.785
0.450
1.400
77.0
127.0
Kg/hr
Eaission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc:
0.969*
2
15
721.292
0.400
1.400
82.0
129.0
3
30
729.292
0.330
1.000
88.0
137.0
U0
0.000 ug
4
45
738.384
0.380
1.200
92.0
135.0
ng/dsan
Concentration, eg/dscm:
O.OOOx
5
60
746.235
0.370
1.200
94.0
136.0
gr/dsai
Concentration, gr/dsan:
O.OOOx
6
75
756.212
0.360
1.300
95.0
131.0
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc:
O.OOOx
7
90
765.620
0.400
1.400
96.0
131.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc:
O.OOOx
8
105
775.242
0.350
1.200
95.0
146.0
9
120/OFF
785.015
10
--
••
••
••
11
--
--
--
--
12
--
—
••
••
-•
••
13
••
--
--
••
--
-•
14
--
—
••
••
--
15
--
--
-
--
--
• •
*16
-
--
••
--
•-
--
17
-
--
--
--
--
18
-
-~
--
--
--
1?
--
--
--
-
--
••
20
--
--
--
--
-•
21
••
••
-•
--
--
••
22
--
••
--
--
--
23
--
-•
••
••
••
24
--
--
--
--
-•
25
--
*-
-*
FIWAt/AVG
120
73.230
0.379
1.262
89.9
134.0
C-114
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN
FIELD DATA
AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9 Run Ho.: OUT-CR-5B
Date: 6-3-90
Sampling Location: Outlet Operator*. CM
Net Run
Time: 120 nin Run Start Time: 1450
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nub Sailing Points: 8 Run Stop Tine: 1650
kozzle Ntnber:
Pressures:
Cp Pi tot Tube Coef.:
C-Sco
Ptwr
Barometric Pressure, in Hj: 29.490
Dia nozzle Dianeter, in:
0.250
pg
Flue Cas Static Press, in H20: 0.000
A Stack/Duct Area, in?:
1319.5
Ps
Absolute flue cas Press, in Hg: 29.490
Vs Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
31.7
Qsd Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM: 14465.8
Hoisture Data:
Qaw Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Wet AC
FX: 17448.4
vie
Vol. Liquid Collected, ail: 78.7
%( Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
106.9
Vtf(std)
Volme of Water Vapor, SCF: 3.704
1W20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.: 5-09
VaKDry) Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
77.921
XZ02
Percent C02 by Volune, Dry: 4.SO
VotfStd) Voluae Cas Metered, Std:
69.051
X02
Percent 02 oy Volime, Dry: 15.00
Hfd
Dry Hole Fraction: 0.949
Fo
Orsat validation Value: 1.31
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Kd
Estimated Ory Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
MS
Wet Nol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.39
ug Cr»6 3.179 ug
ng/dscm Concentration, mg/ds«n:
1.626* 10-3
FIELD DATA
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf:
0.001* 10-3
Meter
Box Nurtoer: EN1 Meter Box dHa:
1.934
Ib/hr Emission Rate,Ib/hr PMRc:
0.088x 10-3
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y: 0.932 Assumed Moisture:
3.00
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc:
0.040x 10-3
Leak Test Rate, CFM: 0.000 Leak Test Vac, in
Hg: 15.00
ug Cr 6.946 uq
Sample Dry Cas
¦g/dscm Concentration, mg/dscn:
3.552* 10-3
Point
Tine Meter Reading Delta P Delta H Cas Meter Stack
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf:
0.002* 10-3
Nub
Cmin) feu ft) (in H20> (in H20) Ten©
foF) Tetro
-------
ISOKINETIC 8AMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RE8ULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Ojtlet
Run Mo.: OUT-CR-5C Date: 6-3-90
Operator: BD
Net Run
Time: 120 min
Run
Start Time: 1457
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nun Sampling Points: 8
Run
Stop T ime: 1657
Nozile Norther:
Pressures:
Cp
Pi tot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Pbar
Barometri: Pressure, in Hg:
29.490
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.250
Pg
Flue Cos Static Press, in H20:
0.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Fs
Absolute Flue Gas Press. In hg
29.490
vs
Flue Cas velocity. Ft/sec:
36.3
Qsd
Volunctric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFH:
16852.0
Moisture Data:
Qaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM:
19983.7
Vic
Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
53.8
XI
Isokinetic Sanpling Rate, X:
97.4
Vu(std) Voluse of Water Vapor, SCf:
2.532
XK20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
3.34
Vm(Dry)
Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
77.932
XCC2
Percent C02 by Voluse, Dry:
4.50
Vm(Std)
Volune Cas Metered, Std:
73.258
502
Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
15.00
Hfd
Pry Hole Fraction:
0.967
fo
Orsat Validation Veluc:
1.31
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Nd
Estimated Dry Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
30.00
MS
Wet Hoi. Ut, Lb/lb-Mole:
29.60
ug
Cr»6 3.092
ug
Meter Box Wiober:
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y:
leak Test Rate, CFH:
FIELD DATA
N16 Meter Box dKa: 1.762
C.996 Assuned Moisture: 5.00
C.OOO Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 10.00
og/dsctn
gr/dscf
Ib/hr
Kg/hr
Point
Nun
Sample
Tim
fmin)
Ory Cas
Heter Reading
feu ftl
Delta P
fin H20)
Delta H
fin H?0)
Gas Meter
Tefro <"oF)
Stack
Ten© ^oF)
ug
¦g/dscn
gr/dscf
Ib/hr
1
0
227.516
0.450
1.400
78.0
128.0
Kg/hr
2
15
237.600
0.420
1.400
83.0
133.0
3
30
246.632
0.300
1.000
85.0
140.0
ug
4
45
255.715
0.350
1.200
96.0
135.0
•g/dscn
5
60
265.715
0.360
1.200
99.0
139.0
gr/dscm
6
75
274.092
0.400
1.300
100.0
132.0
Ib/hr
7
90
285.023
0.390
1.400
101.0
138.0
tg/hr
8
105
295.248
0.340
1.200
100.0
147.0
9
120/OFF
305.448
Concentration, ng/dsco: 1.491* 10*3
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.001x 10-3
Emission Rate,Ib/hr PMRc: 0.094x 10-3
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 0.043x 10-3
Cr 8.033 ug
Concentration, mg/dscm: 3.872a 10*3
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.002x 10-3
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 0.244x 10-3
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 0.111x 1C-3
0.000 ug
Concentration, mg/dscs: O.OOOx 10*3
Concentration, gr/dscm: O.OOOx 10-3
Emission R#te,Lb/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10*3
Emission 8ate,Kg/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10-3
ftNAL/AVC 120
77.932
0.37S
1.262
92.7
136.5
C-U6
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Midpoint
Net Run Tine: 120 rain
Nun Sampling Points: 8
Run No.: MID-RCCR-8A Date: 6/5/90
Operator: CCB
Run Start Time: 1221
Run Stop Tine: 1421
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle Nuraber:
T27
Pressures:
CP
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Pbar
Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.500
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.245
*9
Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
•30.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, ir2:
1319.5
PS
Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
27.294
Vs
Flue Gos Velocity, Ft/sec:
32.2
Osd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFH:
14671.9
Moisture Data:
Qaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, wet ACFM:
17707.7
VIC
Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
90.7
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
100.7
vw(std)
Volune of Water Vapor, SCC:
4.269
XH20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
6.31
Vm(Dry>
Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
67.314
XCC2
Percent C02 by Volume, Dry:
5.00
Vm(Std)
Volume Gas Metered, Std:
63.362
SB 2
Percent 02 by Voline, Dry:
14.00
Mfd
Dry Mole fraction*.
0.937
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.38
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Hd
Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/lb-Molc:
30.00
Ms
Vet Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb*Mole:
29.24
ug
Cr-»6 1.847
ug
Meter Box Nuaber:
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y:
Leak Test Rate, CFM:
A-1
C.98&
0.001
Meter Box dHa: 2.270
Assuncd Moisture: 7.00
Leak Test Vac, in Kg: 7.00
Sanple Dry tos
Point Tiae Meter Reading Delta P
Nun (min) lev ft) (In H2Q)
Delta N
(in H20)
Gat Meter
Tcttp (of)
Stack
Tefro (of)
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
120/OFF
163.600
173.192
182.262
191.024
199.864
207.558
215.232
222.875
231.114
0.360
0.340
0.320
0.320
0.250
0.250
0.250
0.280
1.400
1.400
1.300
1.300
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.150
ag/dsan Concentration, ag/dscn: 1.029x 10-3
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.000* 10*3
Lb/hr Enftsion Rate,Ib/hr PMRc: 0.057x10-3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PNRc: 0.026* 10*3
ug Cr 31.310 ug
mg/dscm Concentration, mg/dscm: 17.451* 10-3
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: O.OOSx 10-3
Lb/hr Enission Rate,Lb/hr PHRc: 0.959* 10*3
Kg/hr Enission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 0.435* 10-3
ug 0.000 ug
ng/dscm Concentration, ng/dsc*: O.OOOx 10*3
gr/dscn Concentration, gr/dscv: O.OOOx 10-3
Lb/hr Enission Rate.Lb/hr PMRc: 0.000x10-3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10-3
FINAL/AVC 120
67.314
0.295
1.194
87.0
84.6
C-117
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Sita 9
Run No.
: MID-RCCR-3B
Date: 6/5/90
Safflpling
location: Midpoint
Operator: GCB
het Run
Time; 120 ota
Run
Start Tim*: 1223
ISOKINETIC DATA
Hun Sailing Points; 8
Run
Stop Tiaw: 1423
Nozzle Ninber:
T 28
Pressures:
Cp Pitot Tube Ccef
C .5*»C
?bar
g«rcfl*tric Pressor#, in hq:
29.500
Dia Nozzle diameter, ;.n:
0.2o5
?S
Floe Cas Static Press, in H2C:
•3C.D00
A Stack/Duct Area, in2:
139.5
?S
Absolute Floe Gas Press, in
27.294
Vs FvJe Gas Ve.oc.ty, Ft/sec:
asd volumetric Air flew Rate, Ory SC
51.8
M: :fcC09.1
Moisture Data:
Qab Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM: 1?<.6$.7
V (c
vol. u'qj'd Collected, ml:
147.5
X: Isokinetic Sampling Sate, X:
'11.3
v-(s:d)
Volune of water vapcr, SCf:
6.943
Xh2C
Moisture Content, X by Vol.
9.37
Vn(Dry) Volune Cas Metered, O.'y:
68.763
XCC2
Percent CC2 by Volur*, Ory:
5.00
vm(Std) Voiur* Gas Metered, Std:
67.169
502
Percent C2 by Voljne, Cry.
14.CO
Mfd
dry Mole fraction:
0.9C6
fa
Orsat Validation Velje:
1.38
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Hd
MS
Estinatca Ory Mol . Vt, »b/Lfc-HoCes
Wet He I. ut, Lb/.b-Ho.e:
30.00
28.88
2 . 496
ug vr*6
ug
ng/ascm Corcentrat ion, mg/cscm':
0.9?1* 10-3
FIELD DATA
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf:
O.OOOx 10-3
Meter
Sox Ninoer: A-2
Meter iox dHa:
2.347
Ib/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc:
0.051* 10-3
?ry Gas Meter Cal. f: 1.024
Assuned Moisture:
7.00
kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc:
0.023* 1C-3
leak Test Rate, CfH: 0.0C2
Leak Test vac.
.n Hg:
7.00
ug Cr 34.
770 i.g
S*nple Ory Gas
mg/dacn Concentration, mg/dsca:
18.281a 10-3
Point
Tine Meter Reading
Delta P
Oelta H Gas Meter
Stack
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf:
0.0C8* 10-3
Nun
((Jiin) (cu ft)
(in H20) (in H20) T«td
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULT8 TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Midpoint
Ri*i No.: MID-RCCR-BC Oate: 6/5/90
Operator: GC8
Net Run
Time: 120 min
Run
Start Time: 1225
ISOKINETIC DATA
Mm Sanpling Points: 8
Run
Stop Time: 1425
Nozzle Number:
T 10
Pressures:
-P
Pitot lube Coef.;
0.840
Pbar
Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.500
Oia
tiozzle Diameter, in:
0.245
PS
Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
-30.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
PS
Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg
27.294
Vs
Flue Cas Velocity, Ft/sec:
31.0
Qsd
Volimetric Air Flow Rate, Ory SCFH:
14162.3
Moisture Data:
Qaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFM:
17050.9
Vic
Vol. Liquid Collected, ol:
69.5
XI
Isokinetic Sanpling Rate, X:
105.S
Vw(std)
Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
4.213
1X20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
6.17
VmCDry)
Volune Gas Metered, Ory:
67.193
%C02
Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
5.00
Vm(Std)
Volune Cas Metered, Std:
64.073
*02
Percent 02 by Volute, Ory:
14.00
Mfd
Dry Hole Fraction:
0.938
fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.38
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Hd
Estimated Ory Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Hole:
30.00
Ms
Uet Mol. Ut, lb/Lb-Mole:
29.26
ug
Cr«6 2.498
ug
Meter Box Nurtoer:
Dry Cot Mttr Cal. Y:
leak Test Rate. CFM:
FIELD DATA
B-1 Meter Box dKa: 2.063
1.000 Assuaed Moisture: 7.00
0.001 Leak Test Vac, in Kg: 7.00
Saapie
Dry Gas
Point
Tine
Meter Reading
Delta P
Celta H
Cas Meter
Stack
Nan
(min)
(cu ft)
fin W20)
(in M201
Tero
fcF)
Ternc (oF)
1
4
307.505
0.310
1.250
86
0
88.0
2
19
316.257
0.330
1.300
86
0
88.0
3
34
325.218
0.320
1.300
86
0
65.0
4
49
334.213
0.240
1.000
86
0
63.0
5
64
342.262
0.240
1.000
66
0
63.0
6
79
350.212
0.240
1.000
88
0
82.0
7
94
358.323
0.240
1.000
90
0
82.0
8
109
366.264
0.280
1.150
90
0
82.0
9
120/OFF
374.698
10
--
••
••
--
11
--
--
-•
--
12
-
••
••
--
13
--
--
--
--
14
•*
--
-•
15
••
-
--
•-
16
--
--
-•
--
17
--
••
--
••
18
--
--
--
1?
--
--
-•
••
20
--
--
--
--
21
--
--
-•
••
22
-
—
-~
--
23
--
--
--
-
24
--
••
••
-
--
25
-•
--
--
-
--
n0/dscm
flr/dsef
Lb/Kr
Kfl/hr
ug
mg/dscm
gr/dscf
lb/hr
Kg/hr
ug
¦g/dscai
gr/dsc*
Lb/hr
Kfl/hr
Conceptrat ion, mg/dscm: 1.377x 10*3
Concentration, gr/dsef: 0.001x 10-3
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 0.073* 10*3
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 0.033x 10-3
Cr 7.620 ug
Concentration, Bg/dsca: 4.200* 10*3
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.002x 10-3
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 0.223k 10-3
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 0.101x 10-3
O.OOO ug
Concentration, mg/dscn: O.OOOx 10-3
Concentration, gr/dscm: O.OOOx 10*3
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10-3
Emission Rate.Kg/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10-3
FIMAL/AVG 120
67.193
0.274
1.125
67.2
64.1
C-119
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Outlet
Net Run Titne: 120 min
Hum Sampling Points: 8
Run Mo.: OUT-CR+6-8A Date: 6/5/90
Operator: HLH
Run Start Tine; 1215
Sun Stop Tine: 1415
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg: 29.500
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20: -0.250
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg: 29.482
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. Lipoid Collected, nl: 22.0
Vw(std) Vol one of Water Vapor, SCF: 1.036
IM20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.: 1.44
Percent C02 by Volune, Dry: 5.00
Percent 02 by Voluae, Dry: 14.00
Dry Mole Fraction: 0.986
Orsat Validation Value: 1.38
XCC2
%02
Mfd
F©
M
Ms
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle Nurber:
CP
Pitot Tube Coef
C .840
Die
Nozzle Diameter, in:
C.240
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
37.9
Qsd
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Ory SCfM:
17310.3
Qaw
Volunctric Air Flow Bate, Uet ACFM:
20846.6
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
99.2
Vm(Dry)
Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
74.313
Vm(Std) Volune Gas Metered, Std:
70.677
Estimated Dry Kol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Hole: 30.00
Wet Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
29.43
Meter Box Nurtoer:
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y:
leak Test Sate, CFH:
FIELD DATA
M-2
0.985
0.004
Meter Box dfia: 1.969
Assisaed Moisture: 6.00
leak Test Vac, in Hg: 8.00
ug
ng/dscfl
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
Point
Nun
Sarrple
T ime
(min)
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
Gas Meter
TeflC (OF)
Stack
Tene (OF 1
ug
mg/dscm
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
1
0
839.738
0.460
1.600
71.0
149.0
ICg/hr
2
15
848.740
0.440
1.530
77.0
150.0
3
30
858.710
0.450
1.570
80.0
151.0
ug
4
45
868.970
0.420
1.400
81.0
153.0
mg/dscm
5
60
878.610
0.380
1.270
84.0
160.0
gr/dson
6
75
887.830
0.400
1.340
86.0
164.0
lb/hr
7
90
897.350
0.320
1.070
86.0
166.0
Ks/hr
8
1C5
905.640
0.320
1.070
82.0
167.0
5
120/0FF
914.051
10
—
-•
• •
• •
--
11
-•
--
--
-•
12
-
••
•-
--
--
13
-
--
-•
--
U
-•
--
--
-•
-•
15
-•
..
-
-•
• •
16
-•
--
--
-•
17
-•
--
••
-•
18
--
--
• •
-•
--
19
--
--
--
--
20
--
--
--
--
21
••
••
••
--
--
22
--
--
..
-•
23
-•
--
• •
• •
• •
24
--
••
-•
25
••
••
--
--
--
Flh'AL/AVG
1?C
74.313
0.397
1.356
80.9
157.5
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Cr*6 0.807 ug
Coocentrat ion, mg/dscoi: 0.403x 10-3
Concentration, gr/dscf: O.OOOx 10-3
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 0.026* 10-3
Emission Rate,ICg/hr PMRc: 0.012x 10-3
Cr 3.246 ug
Concentration, mg/dscm: 1.622x 10-3
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.001x 10-3
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 0.105x 10*3
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 0.048x 10-3
0.000 ug
Concentration, mg/dson: O.OOOx 10-3
Concentration, gr/dsc®; O.OOOx 10-3
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10-3
Emission Rat«,K0/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10*3
C-120
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sanpling Location: Outlet
Net Run Time: 120 min
Nub Sampling Points: 8
i No.: OUT-CR+6-8B
Operator:
Run Start T ime; 1216
Run Stop Time: 1416
Date: 6/5/9C
MLH
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle Nurfcer:
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.64C
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.500
Dio
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.24C
Pg Flue Cas Static Press, in H20:
-0.250
A
Stock/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
29.^82
VS
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
37.9
Osd
Voluietric Air Flow Rate,
Ory SCFM:
17267.7
Moisture Data:
Qaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Uet ACFH:
20859.3
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, al:
27.C
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,
X:
100.6
Vw(std) Vol one of Water Vapor, SCF:
1.271
Xk20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
1.75
Vm(Dry)
Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
79.977
XC02 Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
5.00
Vm(Std)
Volune Gas Metered, Std:
71.499.
X02 Percent 02 by Volune, Dry;
14.00
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction:
0.983
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.38
Md Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Kole: 30.00
Hi uet Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Hole: 29.79
Meter Box Mmfcer:
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y:
Leak Test Rate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
EN-1
0.932
0.008
Meter Box dHs: 1.969
Assured Moisture: 6.00
leak Test Vac, in Ms: 9.00
EMISSIONS RESULTS
ug Cr*6 1.2C3 ug
mg/dsctn Concentration, mg/dsctn: 0.594x 10*3
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.000* 10-3
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 0.038x 10-3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 0.017* 10-3
ug
Cr 3.
.672 ug
Sa.-rpie
Dry Cas
ag/dson
Concentration, mg/dscn:
1.8Kx
10-3
Point
Time
Meter Reading
Delta P
Delta H
Gas Meter
Stack
gr/dscf
Concentration, gr/dscf:
0.001*
10-3
Nir>
Cflin)
Teffo (on
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc:
0.117x
10-3
1
0
99.206
0.460
1.600
75.0
149.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc:
0.053*
10-3
2
15
108.990
0.440
1.530
80.0
150.0
3
30
119.680
0.450
1.570
84.0
151.0
ug
0.000 ug
4
45
130.600
0.420
1.400
87.0
153.0
mg/dscm
Concentration, tng/dsctn:
O.OOOx
10-3
5
60
141.050
0.380
1.270
84.0
160.0
gr/dscm
Concentration, gr/dscm:
O.OOOx
10-3
6
75
150.950
0.400
1.340
88.C
164.0
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc:
O.OOOx
10-3
7
90
161.150
0.320
1.070
90.C
166.0
Kg/hr
Enission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc:
O.OOOx
10-3
8
105
170.150
0.320
1.070
89.0
167.0
9
120/OFF
179.183
FINM./AVG 120
79.977
0.397
1-356
84.6
157.5
C-121
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Outlet
Run Ko.: OUT-CR+6-8C Date: 6/5/90
Operator: RIM
Net Run
Time: 120 min
Run
Start Tine
1216
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nub Sampling Points: 8
Run
Stop Time:
1416
Nozzle NuTtxr:
T-7
Pressures:
Cp Pi tot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Pbar
Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.500
Die Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.242
?9
Flue Gas Static Press, in H20;
•0.250
A Stuck/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
?s
Absolute Flue Cos Press, in
Ms:
29.482
Vs Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
37.9
Qsd Vol
unetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM: 17310.3
Moisture Data:
Oaw Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Uet
ACFM: 20846.6
Vic
Vol. Liquid Collected, ml;
22.5
XI Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
99.8
Vw(std) Volune of Uater Vapor, SCF:
1.059
Xh20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.
1.44
Vm(Dry) Vol
uae Gas Metered, Dry:
78.155
XC02
Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
5.00
Vtn(Std) Vol
iiae Cas Metered, Std:
72.280
X02
Percent 02 by Volune, Dry;
14.00
Mfd
Ory Note Fraction:
0.986
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.38
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Md
Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Kole:
30.00
Ms
Uet Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
29.83
US
mg/dsan
Cr^6 3
Concentration, mg/dscm:
.007 ug
1.469x 10-3
FIELD DATA
gr/dscf
Concentration, gr/dscf:
0.001x 10*3
Meter
3ox Nurber: N-16
Meter 8ox
dHa:
1.820
Ib/hr
Emission tate,Ib/hr PMRc:
0.095* 10-3
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y: 0.996
Assuned Moisture:
6.00
Kfl/hr
emission Rate,Kfl/hr PMRc:
0.043x 10-3
Leak Test Rate, CFH: 0.012
Leak Test
Vac, in Kg:
8.00
ug
Cr 4
.446 Ufl
Siiple Ory Gas
¦g/dscm
Concentration, •g/dscti:
2.172* 10-3
Point
Time Meter Reading
Delta P
Delta
K Cas Meter
Stack
gr/dscf
Concentration, gr/dscf:
0.001* 10-3
Nun
(min) (cu ft)
(in H?0) (in H20)_T
Ten© (oF)
Ib/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc:
0.141x 10-3
1
C 476.715
0.460
1.480
80.0
149.0
KB/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc:
0.064k 10-3
2
15 487.152
0.440
1.420
88.0
150.0
3
30 497.575
0.450
1.450
96.0
151.0
ug
0.
000 ug
4
45 507.982
0.420
1.290
104.0
153.0
mg/dsan
Concentration, mg/dsan:
O.'OOOX 10-3
5
60 S17.869
0.380
1.170
110.0
160.0
gr/dsan
Concentration, gr/dsoo:
O.OOOx 10-3
6
75 527.736
0.400
1.230
112.0
164.0
Ib/hr
Emission Rate,Ib/hr PMRc:
O.OOOx 10-3
7
90 557.118
0.320
0.980
114.0
166.0
Kfl/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc:
0.000* 10-3
8
105 546.062
0.320
0.980
112.0
167.0
9
10
120/OFF 554.870
..
..
..
FINAL/AVG 120
78.155
0.397
1.350
102.0
157.5
C-122
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Stapling Location: Midpoint
Net Run Time: 108 ain
Nun Sampling Points: 8
Run Ho.: MID-CR-10A Date: 6-6-90
Operator: GB
Run Start Time: 1135
Run Stop Tiae: 1319
Pressures:
Pbdr Barometric Pressure, in Hg: 29.600
Pg Flue Cas Static Press, in H20: -30.000
Ps Absolute Flue Cas Press, in H§: 27.394
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, al: 78.6
Vw(std) Vol trie of Uater Vapor, SCF; 3.709
Xn20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.: 6.1*
3X02 Percent C02 by Volune, Dry: 5.65
*02 Percent 02 by Volune, Dry: 14.80
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction: 0.939
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.08
Kd Estimated Cry Mol. Wt, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms uet Mol. Wt, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.27
Meter Box Nurfcer:
Dry Gas Meter Cal. T:
Leak Test Rate. CFm:
FIELD DATA
A1 Meter Box dKat 2.270
0.986 Assuned Moisture: 178.80
0.005 Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 10.00
Sample
Dry Gas
Point
Time
Meter Reading
Delta P
Nun
{min")
-------
ISOKINETIC 8AMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Saopling location: Midpoint
Net Run Time: 108 min
Kiji Sampling Points: 8
Run No.: HID-CR-10B Date: 6-6-90
Operator: CB
Run Start Time: 1137
Run Stop Tine: 1319
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg: 29.600
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H2G: -30.000
Ps Absolute Flue Cas Press, in Hg: 27.394
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. lipuid Collected, ml: 87.7
Vw(std) Volune of Water Vapor, SCF: 4.120
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.: 6.39
XC02 Percent C02 by Volume, pry: 5.65
XX Percent 02 by Volune, Ory: 14.80
Hid Ory Hole Fraction: 0.936
fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.06
Hd Estimated Dry Mol. Vt, lb/lb-Hole: 30.00
ms wet Mol. ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.23
Meter Box Nuifccr:
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y:
Leak Test Rate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
A2 Meter Box dHa: 2.047
1.024 Assured Moisture: 6.00
0.005 Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 10.00
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
108/0FF
188.736
197.313
205.987
214.654
223.475
232.743
250.900
250.900
251,100
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.350
0.320
0.310
0.310
00
00
00
00
00
300
300
00
92.0
92.0
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle Nifiber;
Cp Pttot Tube Cocf.:
Oia Nozzle Diameter, in:
A Stack/Duct Area, in2:
vs Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
Osd Volmetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
Caw Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACfN:
XI Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
Vm(Dry) Volume Gas Metered, Ory:
Vm(Std) Volune Cas Metered, Std:
0.840
0.245
1319.5
33.3
14987.1
18281.4
104.6
62.364
60.463
Sample Dry Gas
Point Time Meter Heading Oelta P Delta N Cas Meter Stack
Win (min) (cu ft) tin H20) Mn H2Q) Temp (oF) Temp (oF)
EMISSIONS RESULTS
ug Cr*6 3.017 ug
«g/dsan Concentration, ag/dscm: 1.762* 10-3
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf; 0.001k 10-3
Ib/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 0.099* 10-3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 0.045* 10*3
ug Cr 26.16C ug
mg/dscm Concentration, ng/dsar.: 15.279k 10-3
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.007* 10-3
lb/hr Emission Rate,Ib/hr PMRc: 0.658x 10-3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 0.389* 10*3
ug 0.000 ug
og/dsctn Concentration, ag/dsan: 0.000* 10*3
gr/dscn Concentration, gr/dscm: O.OOOx 10-3
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10*3
Kg/hr Emission Rete,Kg/hr PHRc: O.OOOx 10-3
FIHAL/AVG 108
62.364
0.311
1.262
92.0
C-124
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Midpoint
Net Rirt Tim: 108 min
Kin Sampling Points: 6
Run No.: MID-CR-10C Date: 6-6-90
Operator: G6
Run Start Time: 1139
Run Stop Tiiac: 1319
Pressures:
Pber Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
Ps Absolute Flue Cos Press, in Hg:
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, alt
VwCstd) Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
29.600
-30.000
27.394
XH20 Moisture content, X by Vol.*.
XC02 Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
XC2 Percent 02 by Volune, Ory:
Mfd Ory Mole Fraction:
Fo Orsat Validation Value:
Md Estimated Ory Mol. Wt, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms Wet Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.37
70.5
3.318
5.21
5.65
H.80
0.948
I.08
ISOKINETIC
DATA
Nozzle Nififcer:
CP
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Oia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.245
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5.
Vs
Flue Cas Velocity, Ft/sec
: 33.3
Otd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Ory SCFM: 15199.5
Oaw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate,
Wet ACFM: 18310.3
Xl
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,
X: 102.9
Vm(0ry) Volute Gas Metered, Ory:
61.614
Va(Std)
Volune Gas Metered, Std:
60.327
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Nutoer: 2.043
Ory Gas Meter Cal. Y; 1.034
leak Test Rate, CFM: 0.001
Meter Box dHa: 2.043
Assumed Moisture: 8.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 10.00
us
ng/dscn
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
Point
Nun
Sample
T itne
< nii nl
Dry Gas
Meter Rending
(cu fn
Delta P
(in H20>
Delta H
fin H20)
Cas Meter
TefflD foF>
Stack
Teno foF)
ug
mg/dscm
gr/dscf
lb/hr
1
0
442.486
0.300
1.200
92.0
92.0
Kfl/hr
2
15
451.482
0.300
1.200
92.0
92.0
3
30
460.161
0.300
1.200
92.0
92.0
ug
4
45
469.979
0.300
1.200
93.0
92.0
¦9/dscsi
5
60
477.815
0.350
1.400
94.0
92.0
gr/dsan
6
75
486.964
0.320
1.400
94.0
92.0
Lb/hr
7
90
495.996
0.320
1.400
94.0
92.0
KB/hr
8
105
504.100
0.320
1.300
94.0
92.0
9
108/OFF
504.1C0
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Cr»6 2.469 ug
Concentration, mc/dscm: 1.445x 10-3
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.001s 10-3
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 0.082x 10-3
Emission Rate,£g/hr PMRc: 0.037x 10-3
Cr 24.870 ug
Concentration, mg/dscm: 14.559x 10-3
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.006x 10-3
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 0.629x 10-3
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 0.376* 10-3
0.000 ug
Concentration, ag/dsca: O.OOOx 10-3
Concentration, gr/dsatr. O.OOOx 10*3
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10-3
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10*3
flHAL/AVC 108
61.614
0.314
1.2B7
93.1
92.0
C-125
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
PI flat: Site 9
Our No
: OUT-CR-lOA
Jate: 6-6-90
Samplir>g Location: Outlet
Operator: MH
Net Run
Ti«e: 95 min
Run Start Tine: 1130
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nun Sampling Points: 7
Run
Stop T i«»e: 1320
Nozile Nmfcer:
Pressures:
Cp Pitot Tube Coef.: 0.&40
Pbar
Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.603
Oia fcozile Diameter, in: 0.24C
Pg
flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
0.000
A Stack/Duct Area, in2: 13*9.5
Ps
Absolute Flue Gas Press, in
Hg:
29.600
Vs Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec: 39.2
Osd Voluoetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM: 17470.9
Moisture Data:
Oau Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFM: 21535.6
Vic
Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
40.0
XI Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X: 100.9
Vw(std)
Vol use of Water Vapor, SCF:
1.683
XH20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.
3.18
Vm(Dry) Volune Gas Metered, Dry: 61.198
XCO 2
Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
4.50
V*KStd) volume Gas Metered, Std: 57.397
XO2
Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
15.00
Kfd
Dry Mole fraction:
0.968
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.31
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
30.00
Ms
Uet Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
29.62
ug Cr*6 1.249 ug
mg/dscn Concentration, ng/dscn: 0.768x 10-3
FIELD DATA
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: O.OOOx 10-3
Meter
Box Nunber: EN2
Meter Box dWa:
2.004
Lb/hr Eaiission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 0.050x 10*3
Dry Gas Meter Cel. Y: 0.965
Assuned Moisture:
3.00
Kfl/hr Emission Rate.Kg/hr PMRc: 0.023x 10*3
Leak Test Rate, CFM: 0.008
Leak Test Vac, in Hg:
15.00
ug Cr 3.709 ug
Saople Dry Gas
ng/dscnt Concentration, ng/dscs: 2.282x 10*3
Point
Time Meter Reading
Oelta P
Delta K Gas Meter
Stack
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.001x 10-3
Nun
(min) (eu ft)
(in H?0> fin N20) Tenu
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: site 9
Sampling Location; Outlet
Rui No.: OUT-CR-lOB Date: 6-6-90
Operator: KH
Net Run Time: 94 min
Run Start Tlae: 1131
ISOKINETIC
DATA
Nun Sampling Points: 7
Run Stop Time: 1320
Nozzle Nuntoer:
Pressures:
Cp
Pi tot Tube Coef.:
C.&4C
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in ug;
29.600
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.24C
Pg Flue Cas Static Press, in K?C:
0.000
A
Stock/Duct Area, ir\2:
1315.5
Ps Absolute Flue Cas Press, in Hg
: 29.600
vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec
39.2
Qsd
Volunetric Air flow Rate,
Dry SCFM:
1747C.0
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Uet ACFM:
21535.9
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
40.0
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,
X:
101.7
Vw(std) Volume of Udter Vapor, SCF:
1.883
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
3.18
V«(0ry)
Volune Gas Metered, Dry;
64.464
XC02 Percent C02 by volune, Dry:
4.50
V«Std)
Voluac Gas Metered, Std:
57.271
So? Percent C2 by Voluw, Dry:
15.00
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction:
0.968
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.51
Md Estimated Dry Hot. Vt, Lb/Lb-Hole: 30.00
Ms uet Hoi. ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.62
Meter Box Nurber:
Dry Gas Meter Cal. T:
Leak Test Rate, CPM:
FIELD DATA
EK18
C.932
0.009
Meter Box dHa: 1.934
Assumed Moisture: 6.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 15.00
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
ug
ng/dscni
gr/dscf
lb/hr
ICg/hr
Point
Hut
Saqple
Time
<®ini
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
(cu ft)
Delta P
(in H20>
Delta H
(in H20>
Gas Meter
Ten©
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling location: Outlet
Net Run Time: 95 min
Klti Sampling Points: 7
Run No.: OUT-CR+6-10D
Operator: SI
Run Start Time: 1131
Run Stop Time: 1320
Date: 6/6/90
M
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle NiiBDer:
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.84C
Pbar Baroraetric Pressure, in Hg:
29.800
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.240
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20;
•0.350
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1315.5
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
29.774
V$
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
39.1
osd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Dry SCFM: 17492.4
Moisture Data:
Qaw
Volinetric Air Flow Rate,
Uet ACFM: 21485.*
vie Vol. Liquid Collected, a(:
39.0
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate.
X: 92.8
Vw(std) Volune of Uater Vapor, SCF:
1.836
Xh20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
3.35
Vm(Dry) volune Gas Metered, Dry:
58.476
%C02 Percent C02 by Voluw, Dry:
5.00
Vm(Std)
Voluae Cos Metered, Std:
52.892
%02 Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
14.00
Kfd Dry Mole Fraction:
0.966
fc Orsat Validation Value: 1.38
Md Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms Wet Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole; 29.60
FIELp DATA
Meter Box Nunber: W-2
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y: 0.969
Leak Test Rate, CFM: 0.012
Meter Box dxa:
Assuoed Moisture:
Leak Test Vac, in Hg:
1.820
6.00
15.00
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
ug
ng/dscm
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
Point
Nsjt*
Saraple
T ime
(ninl
Dry Gas
Meter Reoding
Delta K
lin H20)
Gas Meter
Ten© (oF)
Stack
(oF)
U9
eg/dscm
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
1
0
233.653
0.400
1.230
94.0
158.0
Kg/hr
2
15
241.350
0.420
1.290
95.0
158.0
3
30
251.331
0.430
1.320
102.0
163.0
4
45
260.502
0.390
1.160
107.0
166.0
¦g/dsca
5
60
269.732
0.440
1.300
110.0
165.0
tr/dsc*
6
75
279.505
0.420
1.250
114.0
170.0
lb/hr
7
90
288.999
0.430
1.260
114.0
166.0
Kg/hr
8
9S/OFF
292.129
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Cr*6 1.189 ug
Concentration, mg/dsan: 0.794* 10-3
Concentration, gr/dscf: O.QOOx 10-3
Emission Hate,lb/hr PMRc: 0.052* 10*3
(mission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 0.024x 1C>3
Cr 2.905 ug
Concentration, mg/dscm: 1.939x 1C-3
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.001x 10-3
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 0.127x 10-3
Emission Rate.Kg/hr PMRc: 0.058* 10*3
O.OCO ug
Concentration, ag/dsaa: 0.000* 10-3
Concentration, gr/dsan: 0.000* 10-3
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 0.000* 10*3
Emission Rate,JCg/hr PMRc: 0.000* 10-3
FINH/AVC 95
58.476
0.418
1.261
105.'
163.7
C-128
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling location: Inlet
Run Mo.: IN-RCCR+6-5A Dan
Operator: MAC
6/3/90
Net Run Time: 75 min
Run
Start Time: 1500
ISOKINETIC DATA
Kun Sampling Points: 5
Run
Stop Time: 1615
Nozzle Minbcr:
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot lube Coef.:
0.84C
Pbor Baronetric Pressure, in Hg:
29.600
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.375
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
-0.010
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
14400.0
Ps Absolute Flue Cos Press, in Kg:
29.599
Vs
Flue Cos Ve.ocity, ft/sec:
24.3
Qsd
Volijnetrlc Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
52111.3
Moisture Data:
Qow
Volurctnc Air Flou Rate, Wet ACFM:
146014.4
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
83.6
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
87.9
Vw(std) Vol Line of Water Vapor, SCF:
XM20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
XC02 Percent CO? by Vol^ne, Ory:
X02 Percent 02 by Volume, Ory:
Mfd Dry Kcte Fraction:
Fc Orsat Validation Value;
Md Estinated Dry Mol. Wt, Lb/Lb-Hole: 50.00
Ms Wet Mol. Vt, Lb/lb-Hole; 28.44
3.935
12.99
5.00
14.00
0.870
1.3S
Meter Box Winber:
Dry Gas Meter Cal. X:
leak Test Rate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
RAC-1
1.000
0.002
Meter Box dHa? 1.851
Assuned Moisture: 30.00
leak lest Vac, in Hg: 12.00
7
e
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Vm(Dry) volune Gas Metered, Dry:
Vm(Std) Volune Gas Metered, Std:
EMISSIONS RESULTS
28.793
26.348
mg
mg/dscm
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
Point
Kirn
Sample
Time
(•in)
Dry Cas
Meter Reading
(cu ft)
Delta P
(in N20)
Delta H
(in H20)
Gas Meter
Ten© (oF)
Stack
Teg
Concentration, mg/dscm: 134.032
Concentration, gr/dscf; 0.059
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 26.158
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 11.865
100 lOO.OOCag
Concentration, ng/dsc*: 134.032
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.059
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 26.158
Emission Rate.iCg/hr PMRc: 11.865
100 10d.000ng
Concentration, og/dscm: 134.032
Concentration, gr/dscm: 0.059
unai/avc
28.793
0.C76
C.424
111.2
813.4
C-129
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sarpling Location: Inlet
Net Run T Inc. 76 nin
Nun Sampling Points: 6
Run No.: IN-RCCR+6—5B Date: 6/3/90
Operator: MAC
Run Start Time: 1501
Run Stop Time; 1616
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
d9 flue Cos Static Press, in H20:
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
Hoisture Data:
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, oil:
Vw(std) Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
XC02 Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
SC2 Percent 02 by Vol use, Dry:
Kfd Dry Mole Fraction:
Fo Orsat Validation Value:
Nd Estimated Dry Not. Ut, Lb/lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms wet Mol. Ut, Lb/lb-Mole: 26.26
29.600
~0.010
29.599
99.1
4.665
14.49
5.00
14.00
0.855
1.38
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Nurtoer: RAC S
Dry Gas Meter Cat. T: 1.061
Leak Test Bate, CFN: 0.002
Sample Dry Gas
Point lie* Meter Reading
Nun (mfn) (cu ft)
Meter Box dHa: 1.869
Assuaed Moisture: 30.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 12.00
Delta P
(in H2Q)
Delta H
(in V2Q)
Gas Meter
Te
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULT8 TABULATION
Plant: 8it© 9
Sampling Location: tNlet
Met Run Tine: 77 min
Nun Sampling Points: 5
Run Mo.: IN~RCCR+fi—5C Date: 6/3/90
Operator: KAC
Rix» Start Time: 1502
Run Stop Tine: 1617
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
Pg flue Gas Static Press. in K2Q:
Ps Absolute Flue Cos Press, in Hg:
Moisture Data:
29.600
-0.010
29.599
V'.c
Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
146.9
Vw(std) Volume of Water Vapor, SCF:
6.915
XM20
Moisture Content, X by- Vol.:
19.91
XC02
Percent C02 by Volume, Dry:
5.00
XOZ
Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
14.00
Hfd
Dry Hole fraction:
0.831
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.38
Hd
Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
30.00
Ms
Uet Mol. ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
27.61
ISOKINETIC
DATA
koizle Nurber:
CP
Pi tot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Die
Nozzle Diaacter, in:
0.375
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
14400.0
VS
Flue Os Velocity, ft/sec
24.7
Qsd
Volumetric Air flow Rate,
Dry SCFH:
48685.7
Oaw
Voluaetric Air Flow Rate,
Uet ACFM:
148191.9
XI
Isokinetic Sailing Rate,
X:
96.7
Vrn(Dry)
Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
28.777
Vnv(Std)
Volune Cas Metered, Std;
27.818
Meter Box Nuiber:
Dry Gas Heter Cal. Y:
Leak Test Kate. CFM:
FIELD
RAC 2
1.056
0.008
DATA
Heter Box dHa:
Assented Moisture:
leak Test Vac, in Hg:
1,858
30.00
12.00
EMISSIONS RESULTS
me 100 100.000(1?
mg/dscm Concentration, •o/dsca: 126.950
gr/dscf Concentrat ion, gr/dscf: 0.055
Ib/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 23.147
Kg/hr Emission R»te,Kg/hr PMRc: 10.499
100
IOO.OOOois
Sample
Dry Cas
•3/dson
Concentration, ag/dscn:
126.950
Point
Tine
Meter Rtading
Delta P
Oelta H
Cas Meter
Stack
gr/dscf
Concentration, gr/dscf:
0.0S5
NUH
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULT8 TABULATION
Plant: Site9
SowpUng Location: Midpoint
Net Rin Tine: 120 rnin
Nui Soffpling Points: 6
Run No.: MID-CR-5A Date: 6-3-90
Operator: GV
Run Start Tine: 1447
Run Stop Time: 1647
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle Nunber:
t-28
Pressures:
cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Pbar
Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.490
Oia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.245
Pfl
Flue Gas Static Press, in K20:
•30.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps
Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
27.284
Vs
Flue Cas Velocity, Ft/scc:
34.2
Qsd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCfM:
15991.9
Moisture Data:
Qaw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFM:
18786.1
vie
Vol. Liqjid Collected, ml:
46.3
XI
Isokinetic Saaplirtg Rate, X:
69.9
Vw(std)
Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
2.179
XH20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
4.35
Va
Delta K
(in H201
Cas Meter
Tewo (OF)
Stack
Tefl© (oF)
"S
ms/dson
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
1
0
984.432
0.360
1.200
100.0
75.0
Kg/hr
2
15
992.728
0.360
1.150
100.0
75.0
3
30
1000.374
0.320
0.900
100.0
82.0
ug
4
45
107.009
0.360
0.600
100.0
89.0
ing/dsca
5
60
10012.930
0.320
0.600
100.0
78.0
gr/dsca
6
75
1018.588
0.360
0.600
100.0
81.0
Lb/hr
7
90
1023.743
0.360
0.500
100.0
84.0
Kg/hr
8
10S
1028.372
0.260
0.400
100.0
84.0
9
120/OFF
1036.612
Concentration, ng/dscm: 2.455x 10-3
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.001x 10*3
Eaission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 0.147*10-3
Eaission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc; 0.067* 10-3
0.000 ug
Concentration, fig/dsca: O.COOx 10-3
Concentration, gr/dscf: O.OOOx 10-3
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: O.COOx 10-3
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10*3
Concentration, ag/dsca:
Concentration, gr/dsca:
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc:
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc:
0.000 l>g
O.OOOx 10-3
O.OOOx 10-3
O.OOOx 10-3
O.OOOx 10-3
F1NAI/AVC 120
52.180
0.337
0.764
100.0
81.0
C-132
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND REflPLTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location; Midpoint
Net Rin Time: 122 min
Mm Stapling Points: 8
Run No.: MID-CR-5B
Operator:
Run Start Tine: 1449
Rui Stop Tine: 1649
Oate: 6-3-90
GB
Pressures:
Paar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20;
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
Vw(std) Voline of Water vapor, SCF:
29.490
-30.00C
27.284
XH20 Moisture Content, I by Vol.:
XC02 Percent C02 by Volume, Dry:
X02 Percent 02 by Volunc, Dry:
Hfd Dry Mole Fraction:
Fo Orsat Validation Value:
Md Estimated Dry Mol. Vt, Lb/lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms Uet Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Hole: 29.44
70.9
3.337
4.66
4.50
15.00
0.953
1.31
Meter Box Nunber;
Ory Gas Meter Cal. Y:
leak Test Rate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
A2 Meter Box dHa: 2.047
1.024 Assarted Moisture: 8.00
0.002 Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 10.0C
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
I05
2/OfF
773.526
783.382
792.912
800.791
809.892
818.881
627.861
836.722
845.039
0.360
0.360
0.2S0
0.360
0.320
0.360
0.360
0.270
1.500
1.500
1.090
1.430
1.300
1.500
1.330
1.100
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle Kurber:
Cp Pi tot Tube Coef.:
Dio Nozzle Diameter, in:
A stack/Duct Ares, in2:
Vs Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
Qsd Volunotric Air Flow Rate, Ory SCFM;
Oaw Volumetric Air Flow Rate, wet ACFM:
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
Vm(Dry) Voluae Gas Metered, Ory:
Vra(Std) Voluae Gas Metered, $td:
t-27
0.840
0.245
1319.5
33.8
15763.3
18564.8
99.4
71.513
68.270
Sonplc Dry Gas
Point Tine Meter Reading Delta P Delta H Gas Meter Stack
Nip (winl (cu ft) (in H20) (in H?0) Tenp (oH Temn (of)
EMISSIONS RESULTS
ug Cr«6 1.082 ug
mg/dsoti Concentration, mg/dsan: 0.560* 10-3
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.000* 10-3
lb/hr Eeissfon Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 0.033x 10-3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 0.015* 10-3
ug O.COO ug
mg/dsan Concentration, ng/dscn: 0.000a 10-3
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.000* 10-3
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr pmRc: 0.000* 10-3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10-3
ug 0.000 ug
¦g/dsaa Concentration, mg/dscm: O.OOOx 10*3
gr/dscai Concentration, gr/dscoi: O.OOOx 10*3
Lb/hr Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 0.000* 10-3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10-3
p;nal/avg 12?
71.513
0.329
K325
100.0
80.6
C-133
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Saoplirtg location: Midpoint
Met Run Time: 120 Bin
Nun Swplfr>0 Points: 6
Run Mo.: MID-CR-5C Dote: 6-3-90
Operator: GB
Rin Start Time: 1451
Run Stop Time: 1651
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle Nurber;
t-30
Pressures:
CP
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.640
Pbar
Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.490
Oia
Nozzle Diaoeter, in:
0.245
Pfl
Flue Cas Static Press, in H20:
-30.000
A
Stack/Ouct Area, in2;
1319.5
Ps
Absolute Flue Cos Press, in Hg:
27.284
Vs
Flue Cas Velocity, Ft/scc:
33.8
Qsd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Dry SCFM: 15606.9
Moisture Data:
Oou
Voluactric Air Flow Sate,
Uet ACFN: 18573.6
Vic
Vol. Liquid Collected, al:
66.6
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,
X: 105.6
Vw(std)
Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
4.170
X*20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
5.56
Vm(Dry)
Volune t*as Metered, Dry:
73.446
XC02
Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
4.50
Vm(Std) Volune Gas Metered, Std:
70.779
X02
Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
15.00
Mfd
Dry Mote Fraction:
0.944
fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.31
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Md
Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
30.00
MS
Uet Mol. Vt, Lb/Lb-Mole:
29.33
Cr*6
2.816 ug
Meter Box Umber:
Dry Cas Meter Cal. Y:
Leak Test Rate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
61 Meter Box dHe: 2.004
1.054 Assured Moisture: 8.00
0.001 leak Test Vac, in Hg: 10.00
Point
Nun
Sample
Time
(min)
Dry Gas
Meter fteoding
(cu ft)
Oclta P
(in H20>
1
0
190.972
0.360
2
15
200.957
0.360
3
30
210.424
0.250
4
4S
218.502
0.360
5
60
228.502
0.320
6
75
232.082
0.350
7
90
246.691
0.360
8
105
256.352
0.270
9
120/OFF
264.418
10
-•
11
••
12
-•
13
-•
14
-•
15
--
16
--
17
--
18
• •
19
20
21
--
22
--
—
23
--
--
24
-•
-
-•
25
--
--
-*
Oelta H
{in H20)
Gas Meter
Tero (of)
Stack
Two (OF)
mg/dsem
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
"C
»g/dsa»
gr/
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant:
Bite 9
Run No
: MID-CR-5D Date: 6/3/90
Sampling Location: Midpoint
Operator: GCB
Net Run
Time: 120 tnin
Run
Start Time
: 1453
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nub Sampling Points: 8
Run
Stop Time:
1653
Nozzle Number: T-31
Pressures:
Cp Pltot Tube Coef.: 0.840
Pbar
Barometric Pressure, in Hj:
29.490
Dia Nozzle Diameter, in: 0.245
P9
Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
-30.000
A stack/Duct Area, in2: 1319.5
PS
Absolute Flue Gas Press, in
Hg:
27.284
Vs Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec: 33.2
Qsd Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM: 15380.
Moisture Data:
Oaw Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Met ACfM: 18252.
VIC
Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
70.4
XI Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X: 91.9
Vw(std)
Volune of Uater Vapor, SCF:
3.314
XA20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.
5.19
Vm(Ory) Volume Gas Metered, Dry: 64.995
XC02
Percent C02 by Vol line, Dry:
5.00
Vm(Std) Vol
une Gas Metered, Std: 60.572
X02
Percent 02 by Voluae, Dry:
14.00
Mfd
Dry Mole fraction:
0.948
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.38
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Hd
Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
30.00
Ms
Met Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
29.38
Rig
mg/dscm
100 lOO.OOOmg
Concentration, mg/dson: 58.302
FIELD DATA
gr/dscf
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.025
Meter
Box Uurber; 8-2
Meter Box dHa;
2.215
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,lb/hr PNRc: 3.358
Dry Cas Meter Cal. Y: 1.000
Assumed Moisture:
7.00
Kg/hr
Emission Rate.Ko/hr PMRc: 1.523
Leak Test Rate, CFM: 0.003
Leak rest
Vac, in Kg:
10.00
«g
100 IGO.OOOmg
Sarple Dry Gas
mg/dscfi
Concentration, mg/oscm: 56.302
Point
Tine Meter Reading
Delta P
Oelta
H Gas Meter
Stack
gr/dscf
Concentration, gr/dscf; 0.025
Nub
(min> feu ft)
fin H20) fin K?0> Tew foF)
Tero (of)
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 3.358
1
6 569.337
0.360
1.500
100.0
76.0
KB/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.523
2
21 578.201
0.300
1.200
100.0
75.0
i
36 ses.es?
0.250
1.000
100.0
a3.o
19
100 lOO.OOOmg
4
51 593.192
0.360
1.500
100.0
81.0
ng/dscm
Concentration, mg/dscm: 58.302
5
66 601.615
0.320
1.300
100.0
82.0
gr/dscn
Concentration, gr/dscm: 0.025
6
81 609.978
0.320
1.300
100.0
84.0
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 3.358
7
96 618.191
0.360
1.500
100.0
84.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/lir PMAc: 1.523
8
111 626.704
0.270
1.100
100.0
89.0
9
10
120/CFF 634.332
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
F1NAL/AVG 120 64.995 0.316 1.300 100.0 81.7
C-135
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULT8 TABULATION
Plant: Site 9 - Run
No.
: OUT-CR-5A Oate:
6-3-90
Sanpling Location; Outlet
Operator: RM
Net Run Time: 120 min
Run
Start line: 1455
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nun Sanpling Points: 8
Run
Stop Time: 1635
Noz2le Nurber:
Pressures:
Cp
P itot TiAae Cocf .:
0.840
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.490
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.250
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
0.000
A
Stsck/Ouct Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
29.490
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
36.6
Osd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
16849.7
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Voluoetric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFM:
20095.6
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
65.3
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
91.0
Vw(jtd) Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
XC02 Percent C02 by Volane, Dry:
X02 Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
Mfd Dry Hole Fraction:
Fo Orsat Validation Value:
Md Estimated Dry Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Hole: 30.03
Ms Wet Mol. Ut, ib/lb-Mole: 29.48
3.074
4.30
4. 50
15.00
0.957
1.31
Meter Box Nurber:
Dry Gas Heter Cal. Y;
leak Test Rate. CFH:
FIELD DATA
En2
0.985
0.000
Sample Dry Cos
Time Meter Reading
(twin) Ccu ft)
Delta P
Meter Box dHa: 1.985
Assuned Moisture: 3.00
Leak Tesl Vac, in Hg: 15.00
Delta H Gas Meter Stack
120/0FF
73.230
0.379
Vfn(Ory) Volune Gas Metered, Ory:
VmCStd) Volane Gas Metered, Std:
EMISSIONS RESULTS
73.230
68.468
U9
¦g/dsca
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
U0
«0/dsc«
9r/dscf
(in H20)
(
H?0)
Tent) (oF)
Te*e>
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESPLT8 TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Outlet
Net Run Time: 120 min
Nun Sampling Points: 8
Rur Mo.: OUT-CR-5B Date: 6-3-90
Operator: RM
Run Start Time: 1450
Run Stop rime: 1650
ISOKINETIC DATA
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Kg: 29.490
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20: 0.000
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Kg: 29.490
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml: 78.7
Vw(std) Volune of Water Vapor, SCf: 5.704
XK20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.: 5.09
XC02 Percent C02 by Volvine, Cry: 4.50
X02 Percent 02 by Voltm, Dry: 15.00
Mfd Dry Hole Fraction: 0,949
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.31
Md Estimated Dry Mol. Wt, Lb/lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms Uet Hot. Ut, Lb/lb-Mole: 29.39
Nozzle Vmber:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Dia
Norile Diameter, in:
0.250
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
31.7
Qsd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Dry SCFM:
U465.8
Qaw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate,
Uet ACFM:
17448.4
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,
X:
106.9
VaKDry)
Vol use Gas Metered, Dry:
77.921
Va(Std) Voluae Gas Metered. Std:
69.051
Meter Sox Nunber:
Ory Cas Meter Cat. r:
Leak Test Rate, CFM;
FIELD DATA
EN1
0.932
o.oco
Point
kin
Sacple
Ti«e
(win)
Ory Gas
Meter Reading
Delta P
Meter Box dHa: 1.934
Assuned Moisture: 3.00
Leak Test Vac, in Kg: 15.00
Delta H Gas Meter Stack
0
IS
30
45
60
75
90
105
0/OFF
ug
tng/dscm
gr/dscf
lb/hr
Kg/hr
ug
ng/dscm
flr/dscf
feu ft)
fin HTO)
fir M?0)
T«ft© (cF)
Teao fof>
Lb/hr
963.468
0.400
1.400
78.0
128.0
Kg/hr
978.328
0.370
1.400
83.0
133.0
987.442
0.340
1.000
86.0
138.0
U0
996.555
0.380
1.200
90.0
134.0
ag/dsca
1095.834
0.000
1.200
93.0
137.0
gr/dsca
1015.615
0.360
1.300
93.0
132.0
lb/hr
1025.702
0.400
1.400
95.0
137.0
Kg/hr
1036.137
0.350
1.200
95.0
147.0
1046.389
EMISSIONS RESULT8
Cr*6 3.179 ug
Concentration, mg/dsca: 1.626* 10-3
Concentration, gr/dsef: 0.001x 10-3
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 0.088x 10*3
Eaission Rate,Kg/hr PMRet 0.040x 10-3
0.000 ug
Concentration, ag/dscou 0.000* 10*3
Concentration, gr/dscf: O.OOOx 10-3
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMftc: O.OOOx 10-3
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10-3
0.000 ug
Concentration, ng/dscm: O.OOOx 10-3
Concentration, gr/dscn: O.OOOx 10-3
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMftc: O.OOOx 10-3
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10-3
FINAL/AVG 120
77.921
0.284
1.262
89.1
135.7
C-137
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Stapling Location: Outlet
Run No.: OUT-CR-5C Oate: 6-3*90
Operator: BO
Met Run Tine: 120 ain
Run Start Time: 1457
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nua Sampling Points: 8
Run Stop Time: 1657
Nozzle Number:
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Pbor Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.490
Dfa
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.250
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
0.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg
29.490
VS
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
36.3
Osd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Ory SCFM:
16852.0
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM:
19983.7
Vic Vol. liquid Collected, al:
53.8
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
97.4
Vw(std) Vol line of Uater Vapor, SCF:
2.532
JW2C- Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
3.34
Vra(Dry) Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
77.932
XC02 Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
4.50
Vm(Std) Volune Gas Metered, Std:
73.258
%Q2 Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
15.00
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction:
0.967
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.31
Md Estimated Ory Mel. Ut, Ib/lfc-Kole: 30.00
Ms Wet Hoi. Ift, Lb/Lb-Hole: 29.60
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Nurber; N16
Ory Gas Meter Cal. T: 0.996
Leak Test Rate, CFM: 0.000
Meter Box dHa: 1.762
Assumed Moisture: 3.03
Leak Test Vdc, In Kg: 10.00
U9
¦O/dsoa
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
Point
Nut.
Sample
T in*
(¦tin)
Cry Gas
Meter Reading
(cu fo
Delta P
(in H201
Delta H
(in H201
Gas Meter
Ten©
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling location: Outlet
Uct Run Time; 120 min
Nur Sampling Points: 8
Run Ho.: OUT-RCCR+6-5D Date: 6/3/90
Operator; SO
Run Start Time: 1458
Run Stop T line: 1658
ISOKINETIC DATA
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg: 29.490
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20; 0.000
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg: 29.490
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml: 31.6
Vu(std) Volune of Water Vapor, SCF: 1.487
XK20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
2.07
XC02
Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
5.00
X02
Percent 02 by Volune, Ory:
14.00
Mfd
Dry Mole Fraction:
0.979
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.38
HC
Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Hole:
30.00
MS
Uet Mol. ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
29.75
Nozzle NUBber:
Cp
Pitot lube Coef.:
0.&40
Die
Kozzle Dianetrr, in:
0.2S0
A
Stack/Duct Area, »n2:
1319.5
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec
36.0
Qsd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Ory SCFM:
16910.1
Qaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Wet ACfM:
19770.7
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rote,
X:
93.4
V«(0ry)
Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
76.820
VatfStd)
Volune Gas Metered, Std:
70.494
Meter Box Umber:
Dry Gas Meter CM. Y:
Leak Test Rate, CFH:
FIELD DATA
NU 7
0.969
0.000
Meter Box dHa:
Assuned Moisture:
Leak Test Vac, in kg:
1.887
7.00
15.00
FIKAl/AVG 120
mg
mg/dscm
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
Point
Nun
Sample
Tine
(nin)
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plent: 8it6 9
Sampling Location: Midpoint
ket Run Time: 120 min
Nun Snap ling Points: 24
Run «o.: MID—MM5—7A Date: 6/4/90
Operator: GC8
Run Start T ime: 1716
Run Stop Time: 1918
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle Nurber:
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.640
Pbar
Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.200
Die
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.245
PB
flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
-30.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, ir\2:
1319.5
Ps
Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
26.994
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
3S.8
Qsd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Ory SCFM: 16282.1
Moisture Data:
Qaw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate,
Wet ACFM: 19706.4
Vic
Vol. liqjid Collected. ml:
72.0
Xt
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,
X: 101.2
vw(std)
Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
3.389
XH20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
4.56
v^Dry)
Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
74.476
XC02
Percent C02 by Volume, Dry:
5.0C
ViKStd)
Volune Gas Metered, Std:
70.670
102
Percent 02 by Voluae, Dry:
14.00
Hfd
Dry Mole Fraction:
0.954
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.38
Hd Estinated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Hole: 30.00
Ms Uet MoI. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.45
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Nurber;
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y;
Leak Test Rate. CFM:
A»2
1.024
0.015
Meter Box dHa: 2.047
Attuned Moisture: 7.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 10.00
ng
ng/dscin
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
EMISSIONS RESULTS
100 10Q.003e>g
Concentration, *ig/dsan: 49.972
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.022
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 3.047
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.362
1C0
100.000«>g
Sample
Dry Cas
mg/dscfTi
Concentration, mg/dsem:
49.972
Point
line
Meter Reading
Delta P
Delta H
Gas Meter
Stack
gr/dscf
Concentration, gr/dscf:
0.022
Nin
fmfn)
(cu ft)
fin H20)
(in H?0>
Teno foF)
Tee© (oF)
Lb/hr
Enfssion Rate,Lb/hr PMRc:
3.047
1
0
889.542
0.360
1.500
98.0
86.0
Kg/hr
Eaission Bate,Kg/hr PMRc:
1.382
2
5
892.249
0.360
1.500
98.0
86.0
3
10
695.398
0.360
1.503
98.C
86.0
oig
100
lOO.OOOcng
4
15
898.552
0.360
1.400
98.0
90.0
ng/dscm
Concentration, ag/dsc*:
49.972
5
20
901.663
0.360
1.400
98.0
92.0
gr/dsan
Concentration, gr/dsan:
0.022
6
25
9C4.76S
0.360
1.400
98.0
92.0
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc:
3.047
7
30
907.873
0.360
1.400
98.0
92.0
Kg/hr
Emission 6ste,Kg/hr PMRc:
1.382
6
35
910.978
0.360
1.400
98.0
92.0
9
40
914.092
0.360
1.400
98.0
92.0
1C
45
917.212
0.360
1.400
98.0
91.0
11
50
920.321
0.360
1.400
98.0
91.0
12
55
923.431
0.360
1.400
98.0
90.0
13
60
926.564
0.360
1.400
98.0
90.0
14
65
929.692
0.360
1.400
98.0
90.0
15
70
932.811
0.360
1.400
98.0
90.0
16
75
935.931
0.360
1.400
98.0
92.0
17
60
939.028
0.360
1.400
98.0
92.0
18
85
942.128
0.360
1.400
98.0
92.0
19
90
945.246
0.360
1.400
96.0
92.0
20
95
948.362
0.360
1.400
98.0
92.0
21
103
951.502
0.360
1.400
96.0
91.C
22
105
954.642
0.360
1.400
98.0
88.0
23
113
957.790
0.360
1.400
98.0
88.0
24
115
960.918
0.360
1.400
98.0
87.0
2S
120/OFF
964.018
FHAL/AVu
120
74.476
0.360
1.412
98.0
90.2
C-140
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site9
Sampling location: OUTLET
Net Rin Time: 100 min
kun Stapling Points: 21
Run No.: OUT-MM5-7C Date: 6/6/90
Operator: RIM
Rut Start Time: 0830
Rur. Stop T ime: 1015
Pressures;
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg: 29.800
Pg Floe Gas Static Press, in H20: *0.580
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg: 29.772
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. liquid Collected, ml: 63.4
VwCstdj Voluae of Water Vapor, SCF: 2.964
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.: 4.16
XC02 Percent C02 by VoUme, Ory: 5.00
ZD2 Percent C2 by Volune, Dry: 14.00
Mfd Ory Hole Fraction: 0.958
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.38
Md Estimated DryMol. ut, Ib/lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms Uet Mol. Ut, Ib/Lb-Nolc: 29.50
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle Nunbcr:
T-8
Cp
Pi tot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Die
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.243
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
VS
Floe Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
39.7
Osd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM;
18436.2
Qaw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACfM:
21826.1
XI
Isokinetic Saspling Rate, X:
106.2
Meter Box Nuit>er:
Ory Gas Meter Cel. V:
Leak Test Rate, CfM:
FIELD DATA
N-16
0.996
0.002
Meter Box dHa: 1.762
Assuned Moisture: 6.00
leak Test Vac, in Hg: 8.00
VaKDry) Volune Gas Metered, Dry: 71.940
VnKStd) Vol Lite Gas Metered, Std: 68.823
EMISSIONS RESULTS
trig 100 100.000mg
mg/dscm Concentration, mg/dscm: 51.312
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.022
Ib/hr Emission Rate,Ib/hr PMRc: 3.543
Kj/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.607
Point
Nun
Sample
T i«e
(min)
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
(eu ft)
Delta P
(in H2C)
Delta H
(in H20)
Ga& Meter
Te«© (oF)
Stack
Tone (OH
ms
mg/dscfn
gr/dscf
Ib/hr
100 lOO.OOOmg
Concentration, mg/dscm: 51.312
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.022
Emission Rate,Ib/hr PMRc: 3.543
1
0
629.852
0.440
1.350
62.0
137.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.607
2
5
633.115
0.420
1.290
66.0
138.0
3
10
636.198
0.450
1.380
70.0
138.0
"9
100 ICO.OOOmg
4
15
639.511
0.440
1.350
75.0
139.0
mg/dsan
Concentration, aig/dsot: 51.312
5
20
642.815
0.430
1.340
80.0
139.0
gr/dscn
Concentration, gr/dscn: 0.022
6
25
646.141
0.460
1.430
82.0
140.0
Ib/hr
Emission Rate,Ib/hr PMRc: 3.543
7
30
649.535
0.440
1.350
84.0
140.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rote,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.607
8
35
652.946
0.420
1.290
87.0
140.0
9
40
656.173
0.450
1.400
88.0
135.0
10
45
659.509
0.430
1.380
90.0
129.0
11
50
662.844
0.420
1.360
92.0
137.0
12
55
666.215
0.450
1.450
94.0
139.0
13
60
669.675
0.470
1.520
95.0
139.0
14
65
673.312
0.480
1.550
97.0
139.0
15
70
676.819
0.480
1.550
98.0
141.0
16
75
680.414
0.460
1.480
99.0
128.0
17
80
683.920
0.470
1.520
10C.0
123.0
18
85
687.595
0.460
1.540
102.0
118.0
19
90
691.259
0.440
1.420
102.0
135.0
20
95
694.548
0.470
1.520
103.0
141.0
21
100
698.079
0.480
1.550
104.0
144.0
22
100/OFF
701.792
23
••
~~
--
-
••
--
24
-•
-•
-*
-
••
--
25
-•
**
FINAL/AVG
100
71.940
0.450
1.430
89.0
136.1
C-141
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULT8 TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Outlet
Met Run Time: 120 nin
Hun Sampling Points: 8
Run No.: OUT-MM5-7A Date: 6/4/90
Operator: RLM
Run Start Time: 1715
Run Stop T ime: 1915
ISOKINETIC DATA
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
P9 F(oe Gas Static Press, in H20:
Ps A&solute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
Moisture Data:
29.300
~0.250
29.282
VU
Vol. liquid Collected, ml:
81.5
Vw(std)
Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
3.836
XH20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
3.62
XC02
Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
5.00
X02
Percent 02 by Volume, Dry:
14.00
Mfd
Ory Mole Fraction:
0.964
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.38
Md
Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Ib/Lb-Mole:
30.00
Ms
Uet Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
29.57
Nozzle Nurber:
1-5
Cp
Pitot TUw Cocf.:
0.840
Die
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.242
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Vs
flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec
53.5
Qsd
Volumetric Air Flow Rate,
Ory SCFM:
24361.8
Qaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Uet ACFH:
29435.8
XI
isokinetic Sampling Rate,
X:
100.2
Vm(Dry) Volune Cas Metered, Dry:
109.922
VnKStd)
Voluae Cas Metered, Std:
102.105
Meter 8ox Nutber:
Ory Gas Meter Cal. Y:
Leak Test Rate, CFH:
FIELD DATA
N-16
0.996
0.006
Meter Box dHa: 1.762
Assuned Moisture: 6.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 6.00
mg
og/dscrn
gr/dscf
lb/hr
Kfl/hr
Point
Nin
Sanple
Tine
(min)
Dry Cas
Meter Reading
feu ft)
Delta P
fin H20)
Delta K
tin H20)
Gas Meter
Ten© (oF5
Stack
Tero foF)
mg
cng/dsca
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
1
0
354.800
0.750
2.340
80.0
135.0
Kg/hr
2
15
368.021
0.770
2.400
85.0
142.0
3
30
382.111
0.800
2.500
94.0
145.0
ng
4
45
395.129
0.850
2.650
100.0
141.0
mg/dsca
5
60
409.278
0.820
2.560
104.0
141.0
gr/dsea
6
75
423.223
0.780
2.430
105.0
142.0
Lb/hr
7
90
436.929
0.800
2.500
106.0
145.0
Kg/hr
8
105
450.717
0.&30
2.590
106.0
143.0
9
120/OFF
464.722
EMISSIONS RESULTS
100 100.000ng
Concentration, ng/dscm: 34.587
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.015
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 3.156
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.431
100 100.000mg
Concentration, ng/dscs: 34.587
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.015
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 3.156
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.431
100 100.000mg
Concentration, ng/dsc«: 34.587
Concentration, gr/dsca: 0,015
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 3.1S6
Emission Ratc,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.431
FIHAL/AVC 120
109-922
2.496
2LL
141.7
C-142
-------
ISOKINETIC 8AMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Run No.
.: MID-MM5-7A
Date: 6/4/90
Stapling Location: Midpoint
Operator:
CCB
Net Run Tine: 120 min
Run
Start Time: 1718
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nun Sampling Points: 24
Rin
Stop T imc: 1918
Hozzle Murber:
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tube Cocf.:
0.840
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.200
Oia
Nozzle Oianeter, in:
0.245
Pg Flue Cos Static Press, in H20:
-30.000
A
Stack/Duct Ares, iri2:
1319.5
Ps Absolute Hue Cas Press, in
Hg:
26.994
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
3S.8
Osd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Ory SCFM:
16252.1
Moisture Data:
Caw
Voluwtric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFM:
19706.4
Vic vcl. Liquid Collected, ml:
72.0
XI
Isokinetic SarpUng Rate, X:
101.2
Vw(std) Volume of Uater Vapor, SCF:
3.389
XK20 Moisture Content, 1 by Vol.
4.58
Vm(Dry)
Volume Gas Metered, Dry:
74.476
XCQ2 Percent CQ2 by Volioe, Dry:
5.0G
Vn(Std)
Volune Gas Metered, Std:
70.670
X02 Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
14.CO
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction:
0.954
Fo Orsat validation Value: 1.38
Md Estimated Dry Hot. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms wet Hoi. ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.45
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Nucber: A-2
Dry Gas Meter Cat. T: 1.024
Leak Test Bate, CFH: 0.015
Meter Box dHa: 2.047
Assured Moisture: 7.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 10.00
EMISSIONS RESULTS
mg 100 lOG.OOOmg
ftg/dsca Concentration, mg/dscm: 49.972
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.022
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 3.047
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.382
Point
Nin
Sacrple
Time
(nin>
Dry Cas
Meter Reading
(cu ft)
Delta P
fin H2C>
Delta H
fin H?01
Gas Meter
Twm (oF)
Stack
Tent> (of)
«g
ag/dsca
gr/dscf
lb/hr
100 lOO.OOOmg
Concentration, ng/dscn: 49.972
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.022
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 3.047
1
0
889.542
0.360
1.500
98.0
86.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.382
2
5
892.249
0.360
1.500
98.0
86.0
3
10
895.398
0.360
1.500
98.0
86.0
eg
100 100.000.-ng
4
15
898.552
0.360
1.400
98.0
90.0
ng/dsan
Concentration, mg/dscm: 49.972
5
20
901.663
C.360
1.400
98.0
92.0
gr/dscm
Concentration, gr/dscm: 0.022
6
25
904.765
0.560
1.400
98.0
92.0
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 3.047
7
30
907.873
0.360
1.400
98.0
92.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.382
8
35
910.978
0.360
1.400
98.0
92.0
9
40
914.092
0.360
1.4C0
98.0
92.0
10
45
917.212
0.360
1.400
90.0
91.0
11
50
920.321
0.360
1.400
98.0
91.0
12
55
923.431
0.360
1.400
98.0
90.0
13
60
926.564
0.360
1.400
98.0
90.0
14
65
929.692
0.360
1.400
98.0
90.0
15
70
932.811
0.360
1.400
98.0
90.0
16
75
935.931
0.360
1.400
98.0
92.0
17
80
939.028
0.360
1.400
98.0
92.0
18
85
942.128
0.360
1.400
98.0
92.0
19
90
945.248
0.360
1.400
98.0
92.0
20
95
948.362
0.360
1.400
98.0
92.0
21
100
951.502
0.360
1.400
98.0
91.0
22
105
954.642
0.360
1.400
98.0
88.0
23
110
957.790
0.360
1.400
98.0
88.0
24
115
960.916
0.360
1.400
98.0
87.0
25
120/Off
964.018
FINAL/AVG
120
74.476
0.360
1.412
98.0
90.2
C-143
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Midpoint
Net Rut I it*: 120 rnin
Nun Sampling Points: 24
Run Nc.: MID-MM5-7C Date: 6/6/90
Operator: CCS
Run Start Time: 0817
Run Stop Time: 1017
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
Pg Flue Cas Static Press, in K20:
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
Moisture Data:
29.600
-30.000
27.394
Vic
vol. Liquid Collected, nl:
91.0
Vw(std)
Volu» of Uater Vapor, SCF:
4.283
XH20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
5.B0
XC02
Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
5.00
X02
Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
14.00
Mfd
Dry Mole Fraction:
0.942
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.38
Md
Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
30.00
Ms
Wet Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
29.30
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle Nknber:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Die
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.245
A
Staek/Ouct Area. In2:
1319.5
V&
Flue Cas Velocity, Ft/sec:
34.5
Qsd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Ory SCFM:
15739.6
Oaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFM:
18960.0
XI
Isokinetic Sarrplirtg Rate, X:
103.2
FIELD DATA
Hcter Box Murber: A-2
Dry Cm Meter Cal. T: 1.024
Leak Test Sate. CFM: 0.001
Meter Box dHa: 2.047
Astuaed Moisture: 7.00
Leak Test Vac, in Kg: 10.00
VmCDry) Volime Gas Metered, Dry: 71.261
Mn(Std) Volute Cas Metered, Std: 69.618
EMISSIONS RESULTS
¦g 100 lOO.OOOo*
¦0/dscm Concentration, fng/dsem: 50.726
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.022
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 2.990
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.356
Point
Nus
Sample
Tine
(mini
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
(cu ft>
Delta P
(in H20)
Delta H
(in H201
Cas Meter
T«o CoF)
Stack
Tero toF)
mg
mg/dscm
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
100 100.000otg
Concentration, mg/dscm: 50.726
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.022
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 2.990
1
0
115.625
0.280
1.100
88.0
86.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.3S6
2
5
118.282
0.280
1.100
88.0
91.0
3
10
120.938
0.300
1.200
88.0
90.0
mg
100 100.000og
4
15
123.753
0.350
1.350
88.0
89.0
mg/dscm
Concentration, ng/dsan: 50.726
5
20
126.696
0.330
1.300
88.0
86.0
gr/dscvi
Concentration, gr/dsca: 0.022
6
25
129.642
0.330
1.300
88.0
88.0
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 2.990
7
30
132.583
0.330
1.300
88.0
88.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.356
8
35
135.521
0.330
1.300
88.0
88.0
9
40
138.487
0.330
1.300
88.0
88.0
10
45
141.489
0.330
1.300
90.0
88.0
11
50
144.372
0.330
1.300
90.0
89.0
12
55
147.323
0.330
1.300
90.0
89.0
13
60
150.301
0.330
1.300
90.0
88.0
14
65
163.258
0.330
1.300
90.0
89.0
15
70
156.202
0.360
1.400
90.0
89.0
16
75
159.257
0.360
1.400
90.0
89.0
17
80
162.342
0.360
1.400
90.0
89.0
18
85
165.421
0.360
1.400
90.0
88.0
19
90
168.482
0.360
1.400
90.0
90.0
20
95
171.558
0.360
1.400
90.0
89.0
21
100
174.705
0.363
1.400
90.0
89.0
22
105
177.782
0.360
1.400
90.0
8?.Q
23
110
180.792
0.360
1.400
90.0
89.0
24
115
183.832
0.360
1.400
90.0
88.0
25
120/OFf
186.886
flNAl/AVG
120
71.261
0.337
1.323
89.2
88.6
C-144
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: site 9
Sampling Location: Outlet
Net Run Time: 120 win
Nin Sampling Points: 8
Run »io.: OUT—MM5-7A Date: 6/4/90
Operotor: RIM
Run Start Ti®e: 1715
Run Stop Time: 1915
Pressures:
P&ar Barometric Pressure, in Hg: 29.500
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20: >0.250
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg: 29.262
Moisture Data:
vie Vol. Liquid Collected, ml: 61.5
Vw(std) Volar* of Water Vapor, SCF: 3.836
x*2o
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
3.62
XC02
Percent C02 by Volunc, Dry:
5.00
*02
Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
14.00
Hfd
Dry Mole Fraction:
0.964
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.38
Md
Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Hole:
30.00
Ms
uet Mol. ut. Lb/Lb-Mole:
29.57
Meter 8oa Nifrber:
Dry Gas Meter Cat. Y:
Look Test Rote, CFH:
Poin:
Kan
FIELD DATA
M-1&
0.996
0.CO6
Meter Box dHo: 1.762
Assumed Moisture: 6.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 8.00
Sample
Dry Gas
T ime
Meter Reoding
Delta P
(min)
(cu ft>
(in H20)
0
354.800
0.750
15
368.021
0.770
30
382.111
0.80G
45
395.129
0.8SO
60
409.278
0.820
75
423.223
0.780
90
436.929
0.800
105
450.717
C.830
120/0FF
464.722
Delta H
(in H201
Gas Heter
Tenp (oF)
Stock
TeflO (oF)
2.540
2.400
2.500
2.650
2.560
2.430
2.500
2.550
80.0
85.0
94.0
100.0
104.0
105.0
106.0
106.0
135.0
142.0
145.0
141.0
141.0
142.0
145.0
143.0
ISOKINETIC
DATA
Nozzle Nunber:
T-5
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
U.B4C
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
C.242
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
131V.5
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec
53.5
Osd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Dry SCFM:
24361.8
Caw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Wet ACFM:
29435.8
XI
Isokinetic Sending Rate,
X:
10C.2
Vm(Dry)
Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
109.922
Vm(Std)
Volune Gas Metered, Std:
102.105
EMISSIONS RESULTS
ng 100 lOO.OOGmg
mg/dscm Concentration, mg/dsar: 34.587
gr/dsef Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.015
Lb/hr Eaission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 3.11)6
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.431
mg 100 10G.000.-ng
ng/dscni Concentration, mg/dscm: 34.567
gr/dscf Concentrotion, gr/dscf: 0.015
Lb/hr Eaission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 3.156
Kg/hr Eaission Rete.Kg/hr PMRc: 1.431
¦g 100 100.000fog
ng/dscin Concentration, ng/dscn: 34.567
gr/d&cai Concentration, gr/dscm: 0.015
Lb/hr Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 3.156
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.431
f:km./avc 1?0
109.922
0.800
2.496
97.5
141.7
C-145
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULT8 TABULATION
Plant: Sitd9 Run Ho.
: OUT-MM5-7C Date: 6/6/90
Sampling Location: OUTLET
Operator: RLN
Net Run Time: tOO «in Run Start Time: 0630
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nun Sampling Points: 21 Run
Stop Time: 1015
Nozzle Nurtoer:
T-8
Pressures:
CP
Pitct Tube Coef.:
0.640
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.800 Dia
Nozzle Oianeter, in:
0.243
Pg Flue Ges Static Press, in H20:
•0.560 A
Stack/Duct Area, in?:
1319.S
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
29.772 Vs
Flue &as Velocity, Ft/sec:
39.7
Qsd
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
16436.?
Moisture Data:
Cau
Voluaetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM:
21626.1
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
63.4 XI
Isokinetic Sanpling Rate, X:
106.2
Vw(std) Volune of Uater Vapor, SCF: 2.954
XhZO I
moisture Content, X by Vol.
4.16
Vm(Dry) Vol
une Gas Metered, Dry: 71.94C
XC02 I
Percent C02 by Volume, Dry:
5.00
Vm(Std) Volune Gas Metered, Std: 66.623
X02 I
Percent 02 by Volume, Dry:
14.00
Mfd i
Dry Mole Fraction:
0.956
Fo i
Orsat Validation Value:
1.36
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Kd I
Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
30.00
Ms <
bfet Mol. Ut
, Lb/Lb-Mole:
29.50
*0
ng/dsct
100 100.000mg
Concentration, ag/dsca; 51.312
FIELD DATA
gr/dscf
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.022
Meter Box Ni*t*r:
N-16
Meter eox dNa:
1.762
Ib/hr
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 3.543
Dry Gas Meter Cal.
Y: 0.996
Assimed Moisture:
6.00
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.6C7
Leak Test Rate, CFM: 0.002
Leak Test Vac
, in Hg:
8.00
ag
100 100.000co9
Suiple
Dry Gas
ag/dsca
Concentration, mg/dsce: 51.312
Point
Tine
Meter Reading
Delta P
Delta H
Gas Meter
Stack
gr/dscf
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.022
Nun
(cu ft>
fin H?0> fin H20)
Tetio foH
Ten® (of)
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 3.543
1
0 .
629.652
0.440
1.350
62.0
137.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.60?
2
5
633.115
0.420
1.290
66.0
136.0
3
10
636.198
0.450
1.380
70.0
136.0
ng
100 100.000c*
4
15
639.511
0.440
1.350
75.0
139.0
mg/dsan
Concentration, mg/dsan: 51.312
5
20
642.615
0.430
1.340
80.0
139.0
gr/dscm
Concentration, gr/dsaa: 0.022
6
25
646.141
0.460
1.430
82.0
140.0
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMXc: 3.543
7
30
649.535
0.440
1.350
84.0
140.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.607
6
35
652.946
0.420
1.290
87.0
140.0
9
40
656.173
0.4S0
1.400
88.0
135.0
10
45
659.509
0.430
1.360
90.0
129.0
11
50
662.844
0.420
1.360
92.0
137.0
12
55
666.215
0.450
1.450
94.0
139.0
13
60
669.675
0.470
1.520
95.0
139.0
14
65
673.312
0.480
1.550
97.0
139.0
15
70
676.619
0.480
1.550
96.0
141.0
16
75
660.414
0.460
1.460
99.0
128.0
17
60
663.920
0.470
1.520
100.0
123.0
18
65
667.595
0.460
1.540
102.0
118.0
19
90
691.259
0.440
1.429
102.0
135.0
20
95
694.548
0.470
1.520
103.0
141.0
21
100
698.079
0.480
1.550
104.0
144.0
22
23
24
25
100/0FF
701.792
-
--
--
FINAL/AVC 100
71.940
0.450
1.430
69.0
1ttr1
C-146
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Svnpling Location: Inlet
Met Run Time: 120 min
Njm Sampling Points: 8
Run No.: IN-CR-8A Cate: 6/5/90
Operator: LT
Run Start lime: 1215
Run Step T ime: 1415
ISOKINETIC DATA
Pressures:
Pbar
Barometric Pressjre, in Hg:
29.500
pg
Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
0.000
PS
Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
29.500
Moisture Data:
vie
Vol. Liquid Collected, nl:
39C.7
Vw(std)
Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
18.390
XH20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
25.12
XC02
Percent C02 by Voli*ne, Dry:
5.00
202
Percent 02 by Volume, Dry:
14.00
Mfd
Dry Mole Fraction:
0.749
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.38
Md
Estimated Dry Mol. Wt, Lb/Lb-Mole:
30.00
MS
wet Mol. Wt, Lb/Lb-Mole:
26.99
Nozzle hunker:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Dia
Nozzle Dianeter, in:
0.375
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
14400.0
VS
Flue Gas Velocity, ft/sec
24.7
Osd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Dry SCFM: 34257.3
Qqw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Wet ACFM: 148090.3
XI
isokinetic Sanpling Rate,
X: 173.9
VnKDry)
Volume Gas Metered, Dry:
56.750
VnKStd)
Volute Gas Metered, Std:
54.819
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Number: RAC 1
Dry Gas Meter CM. X: 1.034
Leak Test Rate, CFH: 0.013
Meter Box dha: 1.651
Assumed Moisture: 3C.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 3.CM
Point
S«ple
Time
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
Nor
(min)
(cu ft)
1
0
341.500
2
15
348.500
3
30
355.520
4
45
362.800
5
60
369.900
6
75
376.910
7
90
384.320
8
105
391.200
9
120/OFF
398.250
mg
mg/dscm
gr/dscf
lb/hr
K8/hr
TO
mg/dscin
Delta P
Delta H
Gas Meter
Stack
gr/dscf
(in K20)
(in H20>
Ten© (oF}
Tero (oF)
Lb/hr
0.050
0.700
84.0
1262.0
Kg/hr
0.050
0.700
90.0
1212.0
0.040
0.700
94.0
1171.0
*8
0.070
0.700
97.0
1235.0
¦g/dscn
0.070
0.700
100.0
1234.0
gr/dsai
0.060
0.700
102.0
1270.0
Lb/hr
0.050
0.700
108.0
1208.0
Kg/hr
0.060
0.700
109.0
1209.0
EMISSIONS RESULT8
100.0 lOO.OOOmg
Concentration, atg/dscm: 64.421
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.028
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 6.265
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 3.749
100.0 100.0C0ng
Concentration, reg/dsca: 64.421
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.028
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 8.265
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 3.749
100.0 100.000rag
Concentration, mg/dscm: 64.421
Concentration, gr/dscra: 0.028
Emission Rete,Lb/hr PMRc: 8.265
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 3.749
FNAL/AVG 1?0
56.750
0.056
0.700
98.0
1225.1
C-147
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plont: Site 9
Sailing location: Inlet
Vet Run Time: 120 win
him Sampling Points: 6
Run Mo.: IN-CR-8B Date: 6/5/90
Operator: LT
Run Start Tine: 1216
Run Stop Tine: 1416
ISOKINETIC DATA
Noizle Nurber :
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.500
Die
No2zle Diameter, in:
0.375
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H2Q:
0.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, irt2:
1440C.0
Ps. Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
29.500
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
20.1
Qsd
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry
SCFM:
27807.1
Moisture Data:
Qaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Wet
ACFH:
120449.6
vie vol. liquid Collected, ml:
400.6
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
223.9
Vw(std) Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
18.856
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
24.76
Vm(Dry)
Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
57.878
XCC2 Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
S.00
VntfStd)
Volune Gas Metered, Std:
S7.314
X02
Mfd
To
Hd
MS
Dry:
Percent 02 by Volune,
Dry Mole Fraction:
Orsat Validation Value:
Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
wet Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Hole: 27.03
14.00
0.752
1.38
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Nint*r: RN 5
Dry Gas Meter Cel. Y: 1.061
Leak Test Rate. CFM: 0.0U
Meter Box dHo: 1.869
Assuned Moisture: 30.OC
leek Test Vac, In Hg: 3.00
EMISSIONS RESULTS
ag 100.0 100.000mg
mg/dscm Concentration, mg/dscm: 61.617
gr/d6cf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.027
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 6.417
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 2.911
Point
Nun
Sample
T im»
(ir.in)
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
(cu ft)
Delta P
(fn H20)
Delta H
(in H20)
Gas Meter
Teff© (oF)
Stack
Teno (oF)
Big
eng/dscm
gr/dscf
lb/hr
100.0 lOO.OOOmg
Concentration, mg/dscm: 61.617
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.027
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 6.417
1
0
491.976
0.050
0.700
84.0
1233.C
Kg/hr
Emission Rote,Kg/hr PMRc:
2.911
2
15
498.760
0.040
0.700
90.0
1214.0
3
30
506.000
0.030
0.700
94.0
1192.0
mg
100.0
100.000mg
4
45
513.720
0.040
0.700
96.0
1233.0
mg/dscm
Concentration, ag/dsca:
61.617
5
60
520.120
0.050
0.700
100.0
1203.0
or/dsan
Concentration, gr/dsca:
0.027
6
75
526.900
0.050
0.700
106.0
1263.0
lb/hr
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc:
6.417
7
90
534.200
0.070
0.700
108.0
1273.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc:
2.911
8
1C5
541.600
0.001
0.700
109.0
1283.0
9
120/OFF
549.854
FINAL/AVG 120
S7.878
C.037
0.700
98.4
1236.7
C-148
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Inlet
Net Run Time: 120 min
Kin Sampling Points: 8
Run Ho.: IN-CR-8C Oat«: 6/5/90
Operator: LT
Run Start Time: 1217
Run Stop Time: 1417
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg: 29.500
pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20: 0.000
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in H$: 29.500
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml: 402.5
Vw(std) Volune of Water Vapor, SCF: 18.946
Xh20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
25.76
XC02
Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
5.00
XOZ
Percent 02 by Volume. Dry:
14.00
Mfd
Dry Mole Fract ion:
0.742
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.38
Md
Estinoted Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Hole:
30.00
MS
Wet Mol. Wt, Lb/Lb-Mole:
26.91
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Nuifcer: RAC 2
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y: 1.006
Leak Test Rate, CFM: 0.011
Meter Sox dHa: 1.858
Assumed Moisture: 30.00
leak Test Vac, in Hg: 4.00
Sample
Dry Gas
Point
T ime
Meter Reading
Delta P
Nun
Cain}
(cu ft-)
(in N20)
1
0
286.296
0.060
2
15
293.410
0.040
3
30
300.500
0.050
4
45
307.960
0.060
5
60
314.921
C.070
6
75
322.000
0.070
7
90
329.120
C.060
8
105
344.275
C.080
9
120/OFF
344.275
10
--
-•
11
--
—
12
••
•-
13
--
••
14
-•
15
-•
16
--
--
17
-
••
18
-•
••
19
-¦
20
••
21
--
-•
22
••
23
--
24
-
25
--
--
Delta H
(in H20)
Cas Meter
Teftp (oF)
0.700
0.700
0.700
0.700
0.700
0.700
0.7C0
0.7C0
85.0
89.0
92.0
94.0
96.0
104.0
105.0
108.0
1226.0
1214.0
1198.0
1216.0
1241.0
1263.0
1271.0
1281.0
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle Number:
Cp
Pi tot Til* Coef.:
0.840
Die
Nozzle Oiameter, in:
0.375
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
14400.0
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec.
25.9
Qsd
Volunctric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
35320.9
Qaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM:
155248.3
XI
Isokinetic Sanpling Rate, X:
168.0
Va(Dry)
Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
57.979
VoXStd)
Volune Cas Metered, Std:
54.602
Stack
Tetrp (oF)
EMISSIONS RESULTS
mg 100.0 100.000mg
ng/dsan Concentration, mg/dscm: 64.676
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.028
lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 8.555
Kg/hr Eaission Ret«,Kg/hr PMRc: 3.881
ng 100.0 100.000mg
ng/dscin Concentration, ng/dsca: 64.676
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.028
Lb/hr Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 8.555
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 3.881
wq 1C0.0 100.000mg
ng/dsc« Concentration, ng/dscoi: 64.676
gr/dsca Concentration, gr/dscoi: 0.028
Lb/hr Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMfic: 8.555
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 3.881
FINAL/AVG 120
57.979
0.061
0.700
96.6
1238.7
C-149
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Inlet
Net Run Tine: 64 ain
Hud Sailing Points: 5
Run Ho.: IN-CR-8D Date: 6/5/90
Operator: it
Run Start Time: 1212
Run Stop Time: 1322
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle Nuifcer:
Pressures:
CP
Pitot Tube Coef.:
o.&co
Pbar
Barometric Pressure, in Kg:
29.500
Cia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.375
Pg
Flue Gas Static Press, in h20:
0.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, ii\2:
14400.0
Ps
Aosolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
29.500
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec;
23.9
Qsd
Volumetric Air Flow Rate,
Dry SCFM:
35212.7
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate,
Uet ACFH:
143236.9
vie
Vol. Liquid Collected, Ml:
146.0
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,
X:
150.2
Vw(std) Volume of Uater Vapor, SCF:
6.872
X*2C
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
20.93
Vm(Dry)
Volume Gas Metered, Dry;
27.491
XC02
Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
5.00
Vm(Std) Volune Gas Metered, Std:
25.961
X02
Percent 02 by Volume, Dry:
K.00
Hfd
Dry Hole Fraction:
0.791
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.38
Kd Estimated Dry Hoi. Ut, Ib/lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms Wet Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Hole: 27.49
Meter Box Nurrbcr:
Dry Gas Htter Cal. Y:
leak lest Rate. CFM:
FIELD DATA
RAC 3
1.000
0.016
Point
Sample
Time
Cry Gas
Meter Reading
Delta P
Meter Box dHa: 1.849
Assumed Moisture: 30.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 5.00
Delta H Cos Meter Stack
Nun
(min)
(cu ft)
(in H20)
(
H20)
Ten© foF>
Tero (of)
1
0
31.863
0.060
0
00
82.0
1220.0
2
15
38.230
0.050
0
700
88.0
1213.0
3
30
45.125
0.070
0
00
94.0
1196.0
4
45
52.000
0.040
0
700
98.0
1234.0
5
60
55.700
0.050
0
700
98.0
1209.0
6
64/OFF
59.354
7
-•
--
8
••
••
••
•-
9
••
*•
••
••
1C
••
. ..
-
••
--
',1
-
-•
-
••
-«
12
-•
•
••
13
-
--
-
--
--
14
-•
..
-
••
--
15
—
••
•
— ¦
--
16
--
-•
•
--
--
17
--
•-
-
-
--
18
--
--
-
-•
-•
19
-•
--
•
--
-•
20
-•
••
•
-•
-•
21
-•
--
-
-•
--
22
-*
•
-•
••
23
-*
--
-
--
--
24
-
--
-
-•
-•
25
•*
-
--
FINA'./AVG
64
27.491
0.054
0.700
92.0
1214.4
EMISSIONS RESULTS
mg 100.0 100.000ms
mg/dsan Concentration, mg/dsem: 136.027
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.059
Ib/hr Emission Rate,Ib/hr PMRc: 17.939
Kg/hr Scission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 8.137
¦g 10C.D lOO.OOOmg
¦g/dsca Concentration, ng/dscm: 136.027
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.059
Lb/hr Enission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 17.939
Kg/hr Eoission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 8.137
mg 100.0 100.000ms
ng/dscn Concentration, mg/dscin: 136.027
gr/dscm Concentration, gr/dscm: 0.059
C-150
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULT8 TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Midpoint
Net Run Time: 120 ntn
Nun SampI ins Points: 0
Run No.; MID-RCCR-8A
Operator:
Sun Start Tine: 1221
Run Stop Time: 1421
Date:
GCB
6/5/90
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. liquid Collected, alt
Vw(std) Voluoe of Uater Vapor, SCF:
29.5C0
•30.000
27.294
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
XC02 Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
1D2 Percent 02 by Vol one, Dry:
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction:
Fo Orsat Validation Value:
Md Estimated Dry Mol. Vt, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms Uet Mol. Ut, lb/Lb-Mole: 29.24
90.7
4.269
6.31
5.00
14.00
0.937
1.38
Meter Box Nirtber:
Dry Gas Meter Cal. T:
leak Test Rate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
Meter Box dHa: 2.270
0.966 Assimed Moisture: 7.00
0.001 Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 7.00
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
I20/OFF
163.800
173.192
182.262
191.024
199.864
207.558
215.232
222.875
231. 114
0.360
o.wo
0.320
0.320
0.250
0.250
0.250
0.280
1.400
1.400
1.300
1.300
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.150
ISOKINETIC
DATA
Nozzle Number:
127
Cp
Pttot Tube Coel.:
0.840
Die
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.245
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec
32.2
Qsd
Volunetric Air Flow Rote,
Dry SCFM:
14671.9
Qaw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate,
Wet ACFM:
1770?.7
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,
X:
100.7
Vm(Ory) Volume Gas Metered, Dry:
67.314
Vm(Std)
Volume Cas Metered, Std:
63.362
Sample Dry Gas
Point Time Meter Reading Delta P Delta H Gas Meter Stack
Nun (win? (cu ft) (in H2Q) (in H2Q) Teffp (of) Tefflp (OF)
EMISSIONS RESULT8
wq 100.0 100.000mg
•g/dscn Concentration, mg/dsaa: 55.735
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.024
Ib/hr Emission Rate,Ib/hr PMRc: 3.063
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.389
ng 1CC.0 100.000mg
«g/dscm Concentration, mg/dscm: 55.735
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.024
Ib/hr Emission Rate,Ib/hr PMRc: 3.063
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr Ptttc: 1.389
rag 100.0 lOO.OCOire
ng/dscffi Concentration, cng/dscm: 55.735
gr/dscm Concentration, gr/dsan: 0.024
Lb/hr Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 3.063
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.389
flHAL/AVG 120
67.314
JL22L
JB2LJ2.
C-151
-------
ISOKINETIC 8AMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AKD RE8ULT8 TABULATION
Plant: 8it« 9
Sampling location; Midpoint
Net Run Tine: 120 min
Nun Saopling Points: 6
Run ko.: HID-RCCR-8B Date: 6/5/90
Operator: GCB
Rix» Start Time: 1223
Run Stop Ttme: 1423
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Mg:
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. liquid Collected, al:
Vw(std) Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
XM20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
XCQ2 Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
X02 Percent 02 by Volune, Ory:
Mfd Dry Nole Fraction:
Fo Orsat Validation Value:
Hd Estimated Ory Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 50.00
Ms Wet MoI. Vt, Lb/Lb-Mole: 28.88
29.500
•50.000
27.294
147-5
6.943
9.37
5.00
U.00
0.906
1.38
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle Number:
T 28
CP
Pi tot Tube Cocf.:
0.840
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.245
A
Stack/Duet Area, ln2:
1319.5
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
31.8
Csd
Volumetric Air flow Rate, Ory SCFM:
140C9.1
Oaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Uct ACFM:
17465.7
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
111.8
Vm(Ory) Vol owe Gas Metered, Dry:
68.763
Vm(Std)
Volume Gas Metered, Std:
67.169
PIELD DATA
Meter Box Ninber: A*2
Dry Gas Meter Cel. Y: 1.024
Leak Test Rate, CFM; 0.002
Meter Bo* dHa: 2.047
Assured Moisture: 7.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 7.00
EMISSIONS RESULTS
tng 100.0 lOO.OOOreg
fifl/dscm Concentration, mg/dson: 52.576
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.023
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 2.758
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PKRc: 1.251
Point
Nut
Sample
Ttne
fmi nl
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
(cu ft)
Delta P
fin H20)
Delta H
fin H20)
Gas Meter
Ten© (oF)
Stack
Ten©
mg
mg/d&ca
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
100.0 100.000mg
Concentration, mg/dscn: 52.576
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.023
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 2.758
1
2
976.158
0.560
1.450
86.0
88.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.251
2
17
985.682
0.330
1.300
86.0
88.0
3
32
994.843
0.520
1.300
86.0
86.0
¦>9
100.0 100.000mg
4
47
1003.956
0.260
1.100
86.0
84.0
ng/dsuB
Concentration, mg/dsan: 52.576
5
62
1012.512
0.250
1.000
86.0
82.0
gr/dscs
Concentration, gr/dsen: 0.023
6
77
1020.428
0.250
1.000
88.0
82.0
Lb/hr
Eaftslon Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 2.758
7
92
1028.438
0.230
0.950
90.0
82.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.251
8
107
1056.720
0.280
1.150
90.0
82.0
9
120/OFF
1044.901
10
• •
--
--
--
11
--
--
--
••
12
..
--
--
13
--
-•
--
••
14
• •
--
• •
•-
15
--
-•
-
--
16
--
--
--
--
17
--
-
--
18
..
--
—
--
19
-•
--
--
*•
20
..
--
• •
--
21
-¦
--
--
--
22
--
-•
--
••
23
--
-¦
--
-¦
24
--
-
--
--
-•
25
--
--
--
-•
FINAL/AVG
120
68.763
0.283
1.156
67.2
84.2
C-152
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sanpling location: Midpoint
Run no.: MID-RCCR-8C
Operator;
Date: 6/5/90
CCB
fc'et Rin Time: 120 mir>
Run
Start Tine: 1225
ISOKINETIC DATA
fcun Sampling Points: 8
Run
Stop T!me: 1425
Nozzle Miftber:
T 30
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.500
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.245
Pg Flue Cas Static Press, in H20:
-30.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, irt2:
1319.5
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
27.294
vs
Flue Cas Velocity, Ft/sec:
31.0
Qsd
Volunctric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM;
14162.3
Moisture Data:
Qew
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, uet ACFM:
17050.9
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, nl:
89.5
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
105.5
VwCstd) Voluiw of Water Vapor, SCF:
4.213
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
6.17
Vm(Dry>
Volune Cas Metered, Dry:
67.193
XC02 Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
5.00
VfKStd)
Voluae Cas Metered, Std:
64.073
X02 Percent 02 by Voluae, Dry:
14.00
Mfd Dry Hole Fraction:
0.938
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.38
Md Estimated Ory Hoi. Wt, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms Uet MoI. Wt, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.26
Hater Box Nusber:
Dry Gas Meter Cat. Y:
Leak Test Rate. CFM:
FIELD DATA
1-1 Meter Box dHa: 2.043
1.000 Assuaed Moisture: 7.00
0.001 Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 7.00
Senple Dry Cas
Point Time Meter Reading Delta P
Man (win) (eu ft? (in H20)
Stack
TegpJoF)
4
19
34
49
64
79
94
109
120/OFF
307.505
316.257
325.218
334.213
342.262
350.212
358.323
366.264
374.698
C.310
0.330
0.320
0.240
0.240
0.240
0.240
0.280
88.0
88.0
85.0
83.0
83.0
82.0
82.0
82.0
EMISSIONS RESULTS
«q 100.0 ICO.OOOmg
ng/dscm Concentration, ng/dsce: 55.116
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.024
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 2.923
Kfi/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.326
mg 100.0 100.000mg
mg/dsor. Concentrot ion, ng/dscn: 55.116
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.024
lb/hr Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 2.923
Kg/hr Enission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.326
•g 100.0 IQO.COOog
¦g/dscm Concentration, «g/dse«tt 55.116
gr/dson Concentration, gr/risen: 0.024
Lb/hr Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 2.923
Kg/hr (mission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.326
HHAL/AVC 120
67.193
0.274
125
87.2
84.1
C-153
-------
ISOKINETIC 8AMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULT8 TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Midpoint
Run Mo.: MID-RCCR-8D Bate: 6/5/93
Operator: CCS
Net Run Tine: 120 min
Run Start Ti«e: 1227
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nun Sampling Points: 8
Rur. Stop Time: 1427
Nozzle Nuitoer:
T 31
Pressures:
CP
Pitot Tut* Coef.:
0.&40
Pbar barometric Pressure, in Ng*.
29.500
Die
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.243
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in K20:
•30.000
A
Stack/Ouct Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps Absolute Flue Cas Press, in Hg
: 27.294
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
51.1
Qsd
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
13596.8
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Volonetric Air Flow Rate, Uct ACFH:
17107.7
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
138.4
XI
isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
99.8
Vw(std) Vol use of Water Vapor, SCF:
6.514
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
10.22
Va(Ory) Volune Cas Metered, Ory:
60.047
XC02 Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
5.00
WXStd)
Vol one Gas Metered, Std:
57.259
X02 Percent 02 by VoIuk, Dry:
14.00
Hfd Dry Mole Fraction:
0.898
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.38
Hd Estioated Dry Mot. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms Uct Hoi. Ut Lb/Lb-Hole: 28.77
FIELD DATA
Meter Box |<
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULT8 TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sanpling Location: Outlet
Run Mo.: OUT-CR+6-8A Date: 6/5/90
Operator: MIH
Net Run Tine: 120 min
Run Start T irae: 1215
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nun Sampling Points: 8
Rin Stop Time: 1415
Mo22le NLrrber:
Pressures:
CP
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.500
Oia
Hozzle Diameter, in:
0.240
Pg Flue Cas Static Press, ir H20:
-0.250
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps Absolute flue Cas Press, in Hg
: 29.482
Vs
Flue 60s Velocity, Ft/sec:
37.9
Osc
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
17310.3
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Voluaetric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFM:
20846.6
vie vol. Liquid Collected, nl:
22.0
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
99.2
Vw(std) Volune of Uatcr Vapor, SCF:
1.036
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
1.44
Vr.CDry)
Volune Cas Meterec, Dry:
74.313
XC02 Percent C02 by Volme, Dry:
S.00
Vm(Std) Volume Gas Metered, Ste:
70.677
Xo2 Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
14.00
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction:
0.986
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.38
Md Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms Uet Mol. ut, Lb/Lb-Hole: 29.83
Meter Box Nurber;
Dry Cas Meter Cal. Y:
Leak Test Rate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
BM-2
0.985
o.ocx
Meter Box dHa: 1.969
Assumed Moisture: 6.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hj: 8.00
Sarple
Dry Gas
Point
Time
Meter Reading
Delta P
Delta H
Gas Meter
Stack
Nui
(min)
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Saopling Location: outlet
Met Run Time: 120 min
Nob Sanpling Points: 8
tin No,: OUT-CR+6-8B Dote: 6/5/90
Operator: HiH
Run Start Time: 1216
Run Stop Time; 1416
ISOKINETIC DATA
Pressures:
Pbar Sarometric Pressure, in Hg:
Pj Flue Gas Static Press, in K20:
Ps Absolute Hue Gas Press, in hq:
Moisture Data:
29.500
~0.250
29.482
Vic
Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
27.0
Vw(std)
Vol one of Water Vapor, SCF:
1.271
Xk20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
1.75
XC02
Percent C02 by Voluae, Dry:
5.00
*02
Percent 02 by Volime, Dry:
14.00
Mfd
Dry Mole Fraction:
0.983
Fo
Orsot Validation Value:
1.38
Md
Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
30.00
MS
Uct Mol. ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
29.79
Nozz le Nurtoer:
Cp
Pitot lube Coef.:
0.640
Die
Norzle Diameter, in:
0.240
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
37.9
Qsd
Voluoetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
17267.7
Qau
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM:
20859.3
XI
Isokinetic Sailing Rate, X:
100.6
Vm(Dry) Voluie Gas Metered, Dry:
Vm(Std) Volume Cat Metered, Std:
EMISSIONS RESULTS
79.977
71.499
Meter Box Number:
Dry Gas Meter Cel. T:
leak Test Rate, CFN:
FIELD DATA
EN-1
0.932
0.008
Meter Box dHa: 1.969
Assumed Moisture: 6.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 9.CO
mg
mg/dsctn
gr/dscf
lb/hr
Kg/hr
100.0 lOO.OOOrag
Concentration, mg/dscm: 49.392
Concentration, flr/dscf: 0.022
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 3.194
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.449
100.0
100.000mg
Sample
Dry Gas
mg/dsesi
Concentration, roj/dscm:
49.392
Point
Time
Meter Reading
Delta P
Delta H
Gas Meter
Stack
gr/dscf
Concentration, gr/dscf:
0.022
Mus
(oF)
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc
3.194
1
0
99.206
0.460
1.600
7S
0
149.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc
1.449
2
15
1C6.990
0.440
1.530
80
0
150.0
3
30
119.680
0.450
1.570
84
C
151.0
tag
100.0
100.000mg
4
45
130.600
0.420
1.400
87
0
153.0
itg/dscffl
Concentration, ng/dscm:
49.392
5
60
141.050
0.380
1.270
84
0
160.0
gr/dscm
Concentration, gr/dscm:
0.022
6
75
150.950
0.400
1.340
88
0
164.0
Lb/hr
Emiation Rate,Lb/hr PMRc
3.194
7
9C
161.150
0.320
1.070
90
c
166.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rete,Kg/hr PMRc
1.449
8
105
170.150
0.320
1.070
89
0
167.0
9
120/0FF
179.183
10
-•
-
--
11
-•
••
--
12
--
--
--
13
--
••
--
14
--
-¦
--
15
--
-*
16
••
••
--
17
••
--
18
-•
••
19
--
--
20
--
--
-•
21
••
•*
--
22
--
-•
23
-¦
-¦
~~
24
-•
••
25
--
--
-•
F1HAL/AVC 120
79.977
0.397
1.356
^7.5
C-156
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RE8PLT8 TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Outlet
Run Ho.: OUT-CR+6-8C Date: 6/5/90
Operator: RIM
Net Run Tine: 120 rain
Run Start Tine: 1216
ISOKINETIC DATA
nut Sampling Points: 8
Run Stop Tine: 1416
Nozzle Miflber:
7-7
Pressures:
Cp
Pi tot lube Coef.:
0.840
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Kg:
29.500
Oia
Nozzle Diometer, in:
0.242
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
-0.250
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps Absolute flue Gas Press, in Hg:
29.482
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
37.9
Osd
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
17310.3
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Volumetric Air Flo* Rate, Wet ACFM:
20846.6
vie Vol. Liquid Collected, nl:
22.5
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
99.8
Vw(std) Voluac of Water Vapor, SCF:
1.059
XK20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
1.44
Vn(Ory)
Volune Cas Metered, Ory:
78.155
XCC2 Percent CC2 by Volune, Dry:
5.00
toKStd)
Voliroc Cas Metered, Std:
72.280
XO2 Percent 02 by Voluae, Dry:
14.00
M'd Dry Hole Fraction:
0.986
fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.38
Nd Estimated Dry Hoi. Wt, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.XI
Wet Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Hole; 29.83
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Nunber: IM6
Dry Cos Meter Cat. Y: 0.996
Leak lest Rate, CFM: 0.012
Meter Box dHa: 1.820
Assined Hcisture: 6.00
Leak Test Vac, in Kg; 6.00
Sample
Dry Gas
Point
Time
Meter Reading
Delta P
Delta H
Gas Meter
St»ck
Nub
(min)
(cu ft)
(in H20)
(in H20)
Tea© (OF)
Teno (OF)
1
0
476.715
0.460
1.480
80.0
149.0
2
15
487.152
0.440
1.420
88.0
150.0
3
30
497.575
0.450
1.450
96.0
151.0
4
45
507.982
0.420
1.290
104.0
153.0
5
60
517.869
0.380
1.170
110.0
160.0
6
75
527.738
0.400
1.230
112.0
164.0
7
90
537.116
0.320
0.980
114.0
166.0
8
105
546.062
0.320
0.980
112.0
167.0
9
120/OFF
554.870
10
--
--
-¦
-~
-¦
11
-•
• •
• •
--
12
--
-•
••
••
-¦
13
-•
-•
--
-
--
14
-•
-•
--
••
--
15
-
••
..
--
16
• •
• •
--
--
--
17
-•
-•
--
-
-•
18
--
• •
••
-
--
19
-
--
--
--
•-
20
••
••
••
••
--
21
-•
¦¦
-¦
• •
22
••
••
•-
••
--
23
• •
• •
--
--
--
24
••
--
••
--
--
25
-•
*•
--
F1NAL/AVG
120
78.155
0.397
1.250
10?.0
157.5
EMISSIONS RESULTS
mg 100.0 100.000«g
mg/dscm Concentration, tng/dsa»: 48.858
gr/d&cf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.021
Lb/hr Emission Rate,(b/hr PMRc: 3.167
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.437
mg 1C0.0 100.0C0n«
ng/d&cm Concentration, ng/dsca: 48.858
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.021
Lb/hr Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 3.167
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.437
cng 100.0 lOO.COOng
mg/dscm Concentration, a^/dsan: 48.858
gr/dscm Concentration, gr/dscm: 0.021
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 3.167
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.437
C-157
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
P.ant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Outlet
Ri*i No.: OUT-CR+6-8D Oate: 6/5/90
Operator; RLH
Net Run Tire: 120 rnin
Run Start Time: 1217
ISOKINETIC
DATA
Ntn Sampling Points: 8
Run Stop Time: 1417
Nozzle Njrtoer:
T
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
O.WO
Pbar 8arometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.500
Die
Nozzle Oiaoetcr, in:
0.242
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
-0.320
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
29.476
vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec
38.0
Osd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Dry SCFH:
17073.C
Moisture Data:
Qau
Volumetric Air Flow Rate.
Wet ACFM:
20918.7
Vic vol. liquid Collected, ni:
46.5
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,
X:
95.6
Vw(std) Volunc of Water Vapor, SCF:
2.189
Xh20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
3.11
MrKBry) Volume Cas Metered, Pry:
75.204
XC02 Percent C02 by Volme, Dry:
5.00
Vm(Std)
Volune Gas Metered, Std:
68.169
X02 Percent 02 by Voluae, Dry:
14.00
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction:
0.969
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.36
Md Estimated Dry Mol. tft, Lb/Lb-Hole: 30.00
Ms Uet Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.63
Meter Box Nmber:
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y:
Leak Test Rate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
WJ ¦ 7
0.969
0.006
Meter Box dHa: 1.820
Assuncd Moisture: 6.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hj: 6.00
¦9
ng/dtca
gr/dscf
Ib/hr
Kg/hr
Point
Nub
Sample
Time
(min)
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
feu ft>
Delta P
(in H20)
Delta M
(in H20)
Gas Meter
Temp (OF)
Stack
Tea©
ng
mg/dscm
gr/dscf
ib/hr
1
0
86.120
0.460
1.480
80.0
149.0
JCa/hr
2
15
96.131
0.440
1 .'420
86.0
150.0
3
30
105.995
0.450
1.450
92.0
151.0
mg
4
45
116.139
0.420
1.290
98.0
153.0
ng/dscn
5
60
125.753
0.380
1.170
104.0
160.0
gr/dscn
6
75
134.954
0.400
1.230
107.0
164.0
Lb/hr
7
90
144.460
0.320
0.980
109.0
166.0
Kg/hr
8
105
152.804
C.320
0.980
110.0
167.0
9
120/CFF
161.324
10
--
-¦
--
--
11
--
-•
-¦
--
12
--
-•
--
13
--
••
--
--
14
••
-•
--
15
••
••
••
-
16
--
--
--
-•
17
--
••
••
-•
18
-•
-•
*•
-•
19
••
••
••
-•
20
••
--
•-
--
21
--
••
--
22
-
--
••
23
••
••
--
-
24
--
--
-
25
••
**
-•
••
**
FIMAUAV3
120
75.204
9,597
1.250
98.2
EMISSIONS RESULTS
100.0 IDC.000ms
Concentration, mg/dscn: 51.805
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.023
Emission Rate,Ib/hr PMRc: 3.312
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.503
100.0 100.000ms
Concentration, mg/dscm: 51.805
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.023
Emission ftate,Lb/hr PMRc: 3.312
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.503
100.0 lOO.OOOmg
Concentration, mg/dscm: 51.805
Concentration, gr/dsce: 0.023
Emission Rate,Ib/hr PHRc: 3.312
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.503
C-15S
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RE8ULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Inlet
Run Mo.: IN-CR-10A Date: 6/690
Operator: LT
Ket Run Tiae: 60 rrin
Run Start Tine: 1230
ISOKINETIC
DATA
Nut. Swrpling Points: 4
Rin Stop Time: 1330
Nozzle Ninber:
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Poar BaraaetMc Pressure, In Mg:
29.700
Dia
Nozzle Dianeter, in:
0.375
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
0.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
14400.0
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, ir. Hg:
29.700
vs
Flue Cas Velocity, Ft/sec
22.5
Csd
Volunetrie Air Flow Rate,
Dry SCFM:
33058.2
Hoisture Data:
Qaw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate,
Wet ACFM;
135196.2
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
150.0
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,
X:
176.2
Vw(std) Volute of water Vapor, SCF:
7.060
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
20.85
VflKDry)
Volume Gas Metered, Ory:
28.443
XC02 Percent C02 by Volume, Dry:
5.00
VtXStd)
Volune Gas Metered, Std:
26.800
X02 Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
H.OO
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction:
0.791
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.58
Md Estimated Dry Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms Wet Hoi. Wt, Lb/Lb-Mole: 27.50
Heter Box Murber:
Dry C«S Meter Cal. Y:
leak Test Rate. CFM:
FIELD DATA
RAC1
1.000
0.007
Heter Box dHa: 1.651
Assumed Moisture: 30.00
leak Test Vac, in Kg: 12.00
EMISSIONS RESULTS
mg 100 100.000mg
ng/dscm Concentration, mg/dscm: 131.774
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.058
Ib/hr Emission Rate,Ib/hr PMRc: 16.314
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 7.400
Point
Nun
Sanple
Tine
(min)
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Bite 9
Sampling Location: Inlet
Run Ho.: IN-CR-10B Date: 6/6/90
Operator: LT
het Run Time: 60 rain
Run Start Time: 1230
ISOKINETIC DATA
fcixn Sampling Points: 4
Run Stop Time: 1330
Nozzle Nusber;
Pressures:
Cp
Pi tot Tube Coef.:
0.84C
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.700
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
C.375
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
0.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
144CO.O
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Kg
: 29.700
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
22.9
osd
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
3461".7
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFK:
137282.9
vie Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
150.0
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
185.6
Vw(std) Volune of Uater Vapor, SCF:
7.060
Xh20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
19.28
Vm(Dry)
Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
31.439
XC02 Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
5.00
Vm(Std)
Volune Gas Metered, Std:
29.556
XO2 Percent 02 by VoIum, Dry:
U.00
Nfd Dry Mole Fraction:
0.807
F© Orsat Validation Value: 1.36
Kd Estimated Dry Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Mi. wet Hoi. Vt, Lb/Lb-Nole: 27.69
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Nunber: RAC 5
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y: 1.000
leak Test Rate, CFM: 0.016
Meter Box dHa: 1.869
Asstned Moisture: 30.00
Leak Test Vac, in Kg: 10.00
EMISSIONS RESULTS
mo 100 lOO.OOOmg
mg/dscn Concentration, ¦g/dsar: 119.484
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.052
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 15.488
Kg/hr Emission Rate.Kg/hr PMRc: 7.025
Point
Nun
Sanple
Time
(min)
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
ecu ft)
Delta P
fin H20)
Delta H
(in H20)
Gas Meter
TefTD (oF>
Stack
Teffo (oF)
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AKD RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling location: INlet
Net Run Time: 60 min
Nun Sampling Points: 4
Run Mo.: IN-CR-10C Dale: 6/6/90
Operator: IT
Run Start Time: 1231
Run Stop Tine: 1331
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle Nmfcer:
Pressures:
Cp
Pi tot Tii>e Coef.:
0.840
Pbe-
SaroAetric Pressure, in Hg:
29.700
Dia
Nozzle Oiacneter, in:
0.375
Ps
Flue Ga& Static Press, in H20;
0.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
14400.0
Ps
Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
29.700
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/se<:
23.7
Qsd
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
34872.0
Moisture Data:
Qaw
Votunetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM:
142281.3
Vic
Vol. Liquid Collected, el:
150.0
XI
Isokinetic Sailing Rate, X:
171.8
Vw(std) Volume of Water Vapor, SCF:
7.060
XH20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
20.39
Vm(Dry)
Volune Gas Metered, Dry:
29.395
XC02
Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
5.00
VoKStd) Volune Gas Metered, Std:
27.573
X02
Percent 02 by Volune, Ory:
14.00
Mfd
Dry Hole Fraction:
0.796
Fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.38
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Md
Estimoted Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole:
30.00
Ms
Wet Mol. Ut, Ib/lb-Mole:
27.55
«*9
100 100.000ng
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Nutber: 8AC 2
Pry Gas Meter Cal. T: 1.003
Leak Test Rate. CFM: 0.018
Meter Box dHa: 1.858
Assuned Moisture: 30.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 10.00
ng/dscm
gr/dsc1
Lb/hr
Kg/hr
Point
Nin
Sample
T ine
fain)
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
feu ft)
Delta P
(in H20)
Delta H
fin H20)
Gas Meter
Teffo (oF)
Stack
Teno (oF>
•0
mg/dsca
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
1
0
4C2.52C
0.050
0.700
91.0
1190.0
Kg/hr
2
15
409.210
0.060
0.700
98.0
1230.0
3
3C
416.330
0.05C
0.700
101.0
1270.0
mg
4
45
424.31C
• 0.050
0.700
108.0
1280.0
ng/dsca
5
60/OFF
431.915
Concentration, ng/dsai: 128.078
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.056
Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRe: 16.727
Emission fiate,Kg/hr PMRe: 7.587
10C 100.000mg
Concentration, ng/dscfli: 128.078
Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.056
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRe: 16.727
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRe: 7.587
100 100.000mg
Concentration, mg/dsar: 128.078
FIWAL/AVG 60
29.395
0.052
0.700
99.5
1242.5
C-161
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
SMpi ir>g location; Inlet
Mer Run Tftw: 60 min
Kun Sampling Points: 4
Run No,: IN-CR-10D Dale; 6/6/90
Operator: IT
Rui Start Tin*: 1231
tun Stop Time: 1331
ISOKINETIC DATA
Wozrle Number:
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tube Co«rf.:
0.540
Pfe»r Baron*?ric pressure, in Hg;
29.700
©is
Mezile 0ia
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling location: Midpoint
Net Run Tine: 108 cnin
hum Sampling Points: 8
Ri*i Ho.: MID-CR-10A Dote: 6-6-90
Operator: G6
Rut Start Tiae: 1135
Run Stop Tin*: 1319
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Kg:
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
Vw(sta) Volune of Water Vapor, SCF:
29.600
-30.000
27.394
XK20 Hoisture Content, X by Vol.:
XC02 Percent CC2 by Volume, Dry:
X02 Percent 02 by Voluae, Dry:
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction:
Fo Orsat Validation Value:
Mc Estimated Pry Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms Uet Mol. Wt, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.27
78.8
3.709
6.11
4.50
15.00
0.939
1.31
Meter Box Nurfctr:
Ory Gas Meter Cal. Y:
Leak Test Rate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
A1 Meter Box dHa: 2.270
0.986 Assuned Moisture: 178.80
0.005 Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 10.00
Point
Nun
Savp.e
T ine
Cmin)
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
(cu ft)
Delta P
fin H20)
Delta H
(in H20)
Gas Meter
Tem> (oF)
Stack
Tem> (oF)
1
0
367.285
0.300
1.100
92.0
92.0
2
15
375.591
0.300
1.200
92.0
92.0
3
30
384.042
0.300
1.200
92.0
92.0
4
45
392.042
0.300
1.200
92.0
92.0
5
60
400.801
0.300
1.200
94.0
92.0
6
75
409.256
0.320
1.300
94.0
92.0
7
90
418.088
0.320
1.300
94.0
92.0
8
105
427.095
0.320
1.300
96.0
92.0
9
108/0FF
428.300
10
-¦
--
-•
--
--
11
••
••
-
-
-•
12
--
--
••
--
13
--
--
--
-•
-
14
-•
• •
--
-•
• •
15
••
••
--
--
--
16
••
••
--
-
—
17
--
••
—
--
-
18
-•
-
-•
-
19
--
--
-
--
20
-~
-•
--
--
••
21
• -
--
--
• •
--
22
--
••
--
--
••
23
--
••
--
--
--
24
--
--
--
--
--
25
"
FIKAL/AVG
1C8
61.015
0.307
1.225
93.2
92.0
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nozzle Nuifeer:
Cp Pitot Tube Coef.:
C»a Nozzle Dianeter, in:
A stack/Duct Area, in2:
V& Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
Osd Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
Qau Voluaetric Air flow Rate, Uet ACFM:
XI Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
Vn(Ory) Volune Gas Metered, Ory:
Vvi(Std) Volune Gas Metered, Std:
0.840
0.245
1319.5
33.0
14935.5
18164.2
98.9
61.015
56.980
EMISSIONS RESULTS
ug Cr+6 1.889 ug
cag/dscai Concentration, ng/dsca: 1.171x 10-3
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.0OU 10-3
Ib/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 0.065x 10*3
ICg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 0.030* 10-3
ug 0.000 uo
mg/dscm Concentration, mg/dsca: 0.000* 10-3
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: C.OOOx 10-3
Lb/hr Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10-3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10-3
ug 0.000 ug
ng/dscm Concentration, ng/dscm: O.OOOx 10-3
gr/dscm Concentration, gr/dsca: O.OOOx 10*3
Lb/hr Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10-3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10-3
C-163
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sanpling Location: Midpoint
N«t Run T ioe; 108 sin
Nub Sampling Points: 6
Run No.: MID-CR-10B Date: 6-6-90
Operator: C8
Ri*i Start Tiae: 1137
Run Stop Tine: 1519
Pressures;
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
Moisture Data:
Vic Vol. liquid Collected, ml:
Vw(std) Volune of Uater Vapor, SCF:
29.600
•30.000
27.394
Xk20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
XC02 Percent C02 by Volar*, Dry:
*02 Percent 02 by Voluw, Dry:
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction:
Fo Orsat Validation Value:
Md CitiMted Ory Hoi. tft, Lb/Lb-Mole; 30.00
Ms Uet Mol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.23
87.7
4.128
6.39
4.50
15.00
0.936
1.31
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Nwber: A2
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y: 1.024
leak Test Rate, CFM: 0.005
Sample Dry Cas
Point Time Meter Reoding
hun (cu ft)
Meter Bex dtie: 2.047
Assured Moisture: 8.00
leak Test Vac, in Hg: 10.00
Delta P
(in H20)
Delta H
(in H20)
Gas Meter
Tetro (oF)
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
108/0FF
188.736
197.313
205.987
214.654
223.475
232.743
250.900
250.900
251.100
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.350
0.320
0.310
0.310
1.200
1.2C0
1.200
1.2C0
1.400
1.300
1.3C0
1.300
ISOKINETIC DATA
NoZ2le Nurber:
Cp Pitot Tube Coef.:
Dia Nozzle Oianeter, in:
A Stack/Duct Area, in2:
Vs Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
Qsd volunetrfc Air Flow Rate. Dry SCfM:
Qaw Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFN:
XI Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
Vm(Dry) Volune Cas Metered, Dry:
Vm(Std) Volune Gas Metered, Std:
0.840
0.245
*319.5
33.3
14987.1
18281.4
104.6
62.364
60.463
Stack
TP^P W
EMISSIONS RESULTS
ug Cr*6 3.017 ug
ag/dsca Concentration, ng/dscm: 1.762* 10-3
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.001x 10*3
lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 0.099* 10-3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 0.045x 10-3
ug 0.000 ug
•g/dsca Concentration, mg/dscm: O.OOOx 10-3
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/oscf: O.OOOx 10-3
lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10-3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10-3
ug 0.000 ug
ag/dsca Concentration, ag/dsca: O.OOOx 10-3
gr/dscm Concentration, gr/dsca: O.OOOx 10-3
Lb/hr Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10-3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10-3
FNAL/AVC 108
62.364
0.311
1.262
93.4
92.0
C-164
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant2 Site 9
Stapling Location: Midpoint
Run No.: MID-CR-10C
Operator:
Date: 6-6-9C
G8
Net Run Tine: 108 min
Run Start Tine: 1139
ISOKINETIC
DATA
Nun Sampling Points: 8
Run Stop Tine: 1319
Nozzle timber:
Pressures:
CP
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.84C
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.600
Dia
Nozile Diameter, in:
0.245
Pg Flue Cas Static Press, in K20:
•30.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2;
1319.5
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
27.394
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec
33.3
Qsd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Dry SCFM;
15199.5
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Volunetric Air Flow Rate,
Uet ACFM:
18310.3
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
70.5
XI
Isokinetic Sarpling Rate,
X:
102.9
Vu(std) Volme of Uater Vapor, SCF:
3.318
XH20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
5.21
Vm(Dry)
Volune Gas Metered, Ory:
61.614
XC02 Percent C02 by Volurte, Dry:
4.50
Vm(Std) Volune Gas Metered, Std:
60.327
X02 Percent C2 by Volune, Dry:
15.00
Hfd Dry Hole Fraction:
0.948
Fo Orsat Validation Value: 1.31
Nd Estimated Dry Hoi. Ut, Lb/lb-Mole: 30.00
Ns Uet Kol. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mole: 29.37
FIELD
Meter Box Nunber; 2.043
Dry Cas Meter Col. Y: 1.034
Leak Test Kate, CFH: 0.001
Sample Dry Gas
Point Tiae Meter Reading
Nun (win) (cu ft)
DATA
Meter Box dHa: 2.043
Assured Moisture: 8.00
Leak Test Vac, in Ng: 10.00
Delta P
(in H20)
Oelta H
<<" H20)
Cas Meter
Teffp (oF)
Stack
Twp (on
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
108/OFF
442.466
451.482
460.161
469.979
477.815
486.964
495.996
504.100
504.100
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.350
0.320
0.320
0.320
1.200
1.200
1.200
1.200
1.400
1.400
1.400
1.300
EMISSIONS RESULTS
ug Cr*6 2.469 ug
mg/dscm Concentration, mg/dscm: 1.445x 10-3
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.001* 10*3
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 0.062* 10-3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 0.037* 10-3
ug 0.000 ug
ng/dscm Concentration, mg/dscm: O.OOOx 10*3
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: O.OOOx 10-3
Lb/hr Eaission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: . O.OOOx 10-3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10-3
ug 0.000 ug
mg/dscm Concentration, ag/dsca: O.OOOx 10-3
gr/dson Concentration, gr/dsca: O.OOOx 10-3
Lb/hr Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10*3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10-3
F1NAL/AVC 108
1.287
C-165
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site 9
Sampling location; Midpoint
Net Run Tine: 102 «in
Nua S&npling Points; 7
Run Mo.: MID— RCCR-10D Date: 6/6/90
Operator: CCS
Run Start Tiae: 1141
Run Stop T ime: 1319
Pressures:
Pbar Barometric Pressure, ir. Hj:
Pg Floe Cas Static Press, in H20:
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
Moisture Data:
29.600
-30.000
27.394
vie
Vol. liquid Collected, ml:
141.8
Vw(std)
Volune of Uater Vapor, SCF:
6.675
XM20
Moisture Content, X by Vol.;
11.72
XC02
Percent C02 by Voluae, Ory:
5.00
X02
Percent 02 by Vglure, Dry:
14.00
Mfd
Ory Mole Fraction:
0.883
f 0
Orsat Validation Value:
1.38
Hd
Estimated Dry Mol. Ut, Lb/lfr-Mole:
30.00
Ms
Wet Mol. Ut. Lb/lb-Mole:
28.59
FIELD DATA
Meter Box Nurfcer: 6-2
Dry Cas Meter Cal. T: 1.000
Leak Test Rate, CFM: 0.001
Meter Box dHa:
Assvwd Moisture:
Leak Test Vac, in Ms:
2.125
7.00
10.00
Saople
Dry Gas
Point
Tine
Meter Reading
Delta P
Nun
(¦in)
(cu ft)
(in H20)
1
6
792.216
0.300
2
21
799.917
0.300
3
36
807.697
0.300
4
51
815.493
0.300
5
66
823.267
0.350
6
81
831.318
0.300
7
96
839.172
0.320
8
102/Of F
845.300
9
...
••
••
. 10
--
••
11
••
—
12
--
••
13
• •
• •
14
•-
--
15
-•
—
16
--
17
••
--
18
••
--
19
-•
--
20
-•
-•
21
--
••
22
-
23
••
-
24
—
--
25
-•
Delta H
{in H2Q)
Cas Meter
Tefflp (OF)
1.200
1.200
1.200
1.200
1.400
1.200
1.300
92.0
92.0
92.0
93.0
94.0
94.0
94.0
92.0
92.0
92.0
92.0
90.0
94.0
92.0
ISOKINETIC DATA
Cp
Ola
A
Vs
Osd
Oaw
XI
Nozzle Nurber:
Pi tot Tube Coef.
Nozzle Diameter,
Stack/Duct Area,
in:
in2:
Flue Cas Velocity, Ft/sec:
Volmetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCPM:
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFM:
Isokinetic Sailing Rate, 1:
T31
0.840
0.245
1319.5
33.6
14261.5
18446.3
96.7
53.084
50.277
Stack
Tewp (oF)
Vm(Dry) Voluae Cas Metered, Ory:
Vm(Std) Volume Cas Metered, $td:
EMISSION8 RESULTS
*8 100 100.000ms
mg/dscn Concentration, ¦g/dscm: 70.241
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.031
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 3.752
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.702
ng 100 lOO.OOOoq
ag/dsca Concert rat ion, mg/dsan: 70.241
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: 0.031
Lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 3.752
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.702
wg 1001 100.000n*
ng/dscfl Concentration, ms/dscfli: 70.241
gr/dscA Concentration, gr/dscn: 0.031
Lb/hr Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: 3.752
Kg/hr Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: 1.702
F1HAL/AVC 102
0.310
1.243
93.0
92.0
C-166
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: 8lt© 9
Sampling Location: Outlet
Rc« No.: OUT-CR-lOA Date: 6-6-90
Operator: KH
Net Run Time: 95 mfn
Run Start Time: 1130
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nun Sampling Points: 7
Run Stop Time: 1320
Nozzle Nurt*r:
Pressures:
CP
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Pbar Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.600
Die
Nozzle Oiaffleter, in:
0.240
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H20:
0.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, irt2:
1319.5
Ps Absolute Flue Cas Press, in Kg:
29.600
Vs
Flue Cas Velocity, Ft/sec:
39.2
Qsd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
17470.9
Moisture Data:
Qaw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFM:
21535.6
Vic Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
40.0
X!
isokinetic Sairpling Rate, X:
100.9
VwCstd) Volute of Yater Vapor, SCF:
uea3
XN20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
3.18
Vm
-------
ISOKINETIC
SAMPLING
TRAIN
FIELD DATA AND
RESULTS TABULATION
Plant:
Site 9 Run Mo.
OUT-
CR-10B
Pate: 6-6-90
Sampling Location: Outlet
Operator: MH
Met Rixi
Tise: 94 min
Run
Start Tin
w: 1131
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nun Sampling Points: 7
Run
Stop Tine
r: 1320
Nozzle Murber;
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.640
Pbar
Barometric Pressure, in Hg:
29.600
Dia
Noz2le OiaMter, in:
0.240
Pg
Flue Cas Static Press, in M20:
0.000
A
Stsck/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps
Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg
29.600
Vs
Flue Cas Velocity, Ft/sec:
39.2
Qsd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
17470.0
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFM:
21535.9
VIC
Vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
40.0
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
101.7
Vw(std)
Volune of Uater Vapor, SCF:
1.883
XH20
Moisture Content, % by vol.:
3.18
Vti(Dry)
Volune Cas Metered, Dry:
64.464
XC02
Percent C02 by Vol me, Dry:
4.SO
Vr.(Std) Volune Cas Metered, Std:
57.271
X02
Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
15.00
Mfd
Dry Mole Fraction:
0.968
fo
Orsat Validation Value:
1.31
EMISSIONS RESULTS
Md
E&tiaated Dry Hoi. Ut, Lb/Lb-Mote:
30.00
MS
vet Hoi. wt, Lb/Lb-Mole:
29.62
ug
Cr+6 1.237
ug
Meter Box Nurber:
Dry Gas Meter Cel. Y:
Leak lest Rate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
EH1S
0.932
0.009
Meter Box dHa: 1.934
Assured Moisture: 8.00
Leak Test Vac, in Hg: 15.00
¦g/dscia
gr/dscf
lb/hr
Kg/hr
Point
Nun
Sanple
T ime
(min)
Dry Gas
Meter Reading
(cu ft)
Delta P
(in H20)
Delta H
(in H201
Gas Meter
Ten© (oF)
Stack
Teeo (oF)
ug
jng/dscn
gr/dscf
Lb/hr
1
0
257.591
0.400
1.400
78.0
158.0
Ko/hr
2
15
267.250
0.420
1.400
83.0
156.0
3
30
277.610
0.430
1.500
88.0
163.0
us
4
45
288.200
0.390
1.300
92.0
166.0
mg/dscn
5
60
298.190
0.440
1.500
94.0
165.0
gr/dscm
6
75
308.750
0.420
1.400
97.0
170.0
Lb/hr
7
90
319.240
0.430
1.5C0
98.0
166.0
Kfi/hr
8
94/OFF
322.055
9
-
••
--
••
-•
10
• •
*•
--
--
--
11
••
•-
--
--
• •
12
-
--
-•
-¦
-•
13
• *
..
--
--
• -
14
--
--
-
--
15
--
--
...
16
--
--
• •
*.7
• -
--
• •
--
--
18
--
-•
• •
--
--
19
•-
••
..
-
--
20
--
••
--
-•
-•
21
••
--
--
--
--
22
--
--
-
-•
23
—
--
••
-•
24
-
••
..
• •
• •
25
--
-•
-•
--
FINAL/AVC
94
64.464
0.418
1.429
90.0
163.4
Concentration, vg/dsevi: 0.763x 10*3
Concent rati or, gr/dscf: 0.000* 10-3
Emission Rate,lb/hr Ptttc: 0.C50x 10-3
Emission Sate.Kg/hr PMRc: O.G23x 10*3
0.000 ug
Concentration, sg/dsca: 0.000* 10*3
Concentration, gr/dscf: O.OOOx 10*3
Emission Rate,lb/hr PHRc: O.OOOx 10*3
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10-3
0.000 ug
Concentration, ng/dscm: O.OOOx 10*3
Concentration, gr/dscn: O.OOOx 10-3
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10*3
Emissior Rate,Kg/hr PMRc: O.OOOx 10-3
C-l 68
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: Site9 Run
No.
: OUT-CR-10C Date:
6-6-90
Sampiing Location: Outlet
Operator: RM
Net Rin line: 95 nin
Run
Start Time: 1130
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nun Sampling Points: 7
Run
Stop Tine: 1320
Nozzle Nurtoer:
Pressures:
CP
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.640
Poar Barometric Pressure, in Nj:
29.600
Dia
Nozzle Diameter, in:
0.240
Pg Flue Gas Static Press, in H?0:
0.000
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg:
29.600
Vs
flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
39.2
Qsd
Velunetric Air flow Rate, Dry SCFM:
17436.6
Moisture Data:
Caw
Volunetric Air Flou Rate, Wet ACfM:
21549.0
Vic Vol. liquid Collected, ml:
40.0
X]
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
95.C
Vw(std) Volume1 cf water vapor, SCF:
1.663
XK20 Moisture Content, X by Vol.:
3.37
Vm(Dry)
Volute Gas Metered, Ory:
58.476
XC02 Percent C02 by Volune, Dry:
4.50
Vm(Std)
Volme Gas Metered, Std:
53.964
X02 Percent 02 by Volune, Dry:
1S.00
Mfd Ory Mole Fraction:
0.966
F© Orsat Validation Value: 1.31
Hd Estimated Ory Hoi. Ut, Ib/Lb-Mole: 30.00
Ms Wet NoI. Wt, ib/lb-Mcle: 29.60
Meter Box Nurtoer:
Dry Gas Meter Cal. Y:
leak Test Rate, CFM:
FIELD DATA
N16
0.996
0.009
Meter Box dHo: 1.820
Attuned Moisture: 3.CO
Leak Test Vac, in Hs: 15.00
EMISSIONS RESULTS
ug Cr*6 1.189 us
mg/dscm Concentration, mg/dsar: 0.778x 10-3
gr/dscf Concentration, gr/dscf: O.OOOx 10-3
lb/hr Emission Rate,lb/hr PMRc: 0.051* 10-3
Kg/hr Emission Rate,ICg/hr PMRc: 0.023* 10-3
ug
0
.000 ug
Sample
Dry Gas
a^/dscm
Concentration, ng/dsca:
0.000*
Point
Tine
Meter Reading
Delta P
Delta H
Gas Meter
Stack
gr/dscf
Concentration, gr/dscf:
O.OOOx
Nub
(min)
(cu ft)
fin H?0)
K20)
Ten©
-------
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING TRAIN FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TADULATION
P.ant: Site 9
Sampling Location: Outlet
Run No.: OUT-CR+6-10D Date: 6/6/90
Operator: RLM
Net Run
Time: 95 min
Rut
Start Time: 1131
ISOKINETIC DATA
Nun Sampling Points: 7
Run
Stop Ti.T*: 132C
Nozzle Nurrber:
Pressures:
Cp
Pitot Tube Coef.:
0.840
Poar
Barometric Pressure, ir. Hg;
29.800
Cia
Nozzle Dianeter, in:
0.240
Pfl
Flue Cas Static Press, in M2C:
•0.350
A
Stack/Duct Area, in2:
1319.5
Pi
Absolute Flue Gas Press, in Hg;
29.774
Vs
Flue Gas Velocity, Ft/sec:
39.1
Osd
Volunetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SC^M:
17492.4
Moisture Data:
Oaw
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Uet ACFM:
21485.1
vie
vol. Liquid Collected, ml:
39.0
XI
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, X:
92.8
Vw
(in H20>
(ir. H20)
Tenc (oF>
Teflc (oF)
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc:
4.374
1
0
233.653
0.400
1.230
94.0
158.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PMRc
1.984
2
15
241.350
0.420
1.290
95.0
158.0
3
30
251.331
0.430
1.320
102.0
163.0
m9
100
100-000«g
4
45
260.502
0.390
1.160
107.0
166.0
mg/dsan
Concentration, ng/dscr.:
66.768
5
60
269.732
0.440
1.300
110.0
165.0
gr/dscm
Concentration, gr/dscit:
0.029
6
75
279.505
0.420
1.250
114.0
170.0
Lb/hr
Emission Rate,Lb/hr PMRc
: 4.374
7
90
288.999
0.430
1.280
114.0
166.0
Kg/hr
Emission Rate,Kg/hr PHRc
1.984
8
95/0FF
292.129
F1HAL/AVG 95
58.476
0.418
JJ&L
J2U.
163.7
C-170
-------
Appendix D
Analytical Data
and Reports
D-l
-------
PARTICULATE SAMPLING LABORATORY RESULTS
Plant Namei SSI SITE #9 EEI Re*# 3008
Sampling Location:
Date Received) 6/12 Date Analyzed! 6/27 Reagent Box(es):
Run Number
Run Date
4A-0UT
4B-0UT
Sample ID/Container #
F / 9-18
F / 9-20
CRBI1XIII
Tare Weight., g.
SAMPLE WT., g.
•6.8959
6o 8963
6.2266
nmcin
0.6693
6.8047
6.8052
6.8065
6.2690
l«B*BC8l
0.5357
Sample ID/Container #
R / 9-19
R / 9-24
Tare Wt., g.
SAMPLE WT., g.
-6.3422
6.3426
6.3435
6.3388
¦¦IMBSI
0,0034
6.1275
6.1276
6.1284
6.1247
taaBasaiBi
0.0028
Sum of Particulate, mg.
Total Filter Tare, mg.
Blank Residue, mg. ( 175 ml)
TOTAL PARTICULATE CATCH, mg.
672.7 538.5
643.0 511.2
0.4 ( 175 mi) 0.4
i>OBMBKo aiauasii
29.3 26.9
Blank Beaker # 2003
Final wt., mg. 99546,3
Tare wt., mg. 99545.9
Residue, mg. 0.4
Volume, ml. 200
Concentration, mg/ml 0,002
—Legend—
¦ Final Weight
L = Loose Particulate
F ¦ Filter D ¦ Dish
R ® Rinse P ¦ Pan
Notes and Comments
D-2
-------
PARTICULATE SAMPLI NG LABORATORY RESULTS
Plant Namei SSI SITE #9
Sampling Location]
Date Received! 6/12 Date Analyzed! 6/27 Reagent Box(es)i
EE1 Rs-f# 3808
Run Number
Run Date
9A-0UT
9B-0UT
Sample ID/Container #
F / 9-44
F / 9-46
Tare Weight., g.
SAMPLE WT., g.
6.9093
6.9094
6.9112
6.3908
¦¦BBIIBBIIOB
0.5185
o.6198
6.6199
6.6210
6.1010
¦tlBBBSBBI
0.5186
Sample ID/Container #
R / 9-45
R / 9-47
¦IBBBIBXI
Tare Wt., g.
SAMPLE WT., g.
6.1045
6.1045
6.1051
6.1007
IBSB8BK1I
0.0038
6.2178
6.2177
6.2186
6.2142
9BBBBBBSCB
0.0035
Sum of Particulate, mg. 522.3
Total Filter Tare, mg. 515.9
Blank Residue, mg. ( 100 ml) 0.2 (
¦¦CBKaaaDB
TOTAL PARTICULATE CATCH, mg. 6.2
100 ml)
522.3
515.6
0.2
issmii
6.5
Blank Beaker tt 2003
Final wt,, mg. 99546.3
Tare wt., mg. 99545.9
Residue, mg. 0,4
Volume, ml. 200
Concentration, mg/ml 0.002
—Legend-
's Final Weight
L B Loose Particulate
F c Filter D ¦ Dish
R ¦ Rinse P ¦ Pan
Notes and Comments
D-3
-------
PARTICULATE SAMPLING LABORATORY RESULTS
Plant Name: SSI SITE #9 EE I Re?*# 3B08
Sampling Location!
Date Received: 6/12 Date Analyzed: 6/27 Reagent Box(es):
Run Number
Run Date
11A-0UT
11B-QUT
Sample ID/Container #
F / 9-5
F / 9-8
Tare Weight., g.
SAMPLE WT., g.
4«9254
6.9256
6.9272
6.92B3
6.4102
¦¦¦SBSBSa
0.5152
6.5867
6.5869
6.0726
taaiaaai
0.5141
Sample IE/Container #
R / 9-7
R / 9-10
laOKBOSCBS
Tare Wt. , g.
SAMPLE WT., g.
6.2457
6.2456
6.2464
6.2430
ssisflciais
0.0026
6.2715
6.2714
6.2730
6.2677
rsocancacc
0.0037
Sum of Particulate, mg.
Total Filter Tare, mg.
Blank Residue, mg. ( 125 ml)
TOTAL PARTICULATE CATCH, mg.
517.8 517.8
513.6 511.3
0.3 ( 75 ml) 0.2
3,9
6.3
Blank Beaker # 2003
Final wt., mg. 99546.3
TarB wt., mg. 99545.9
Residue, mg. 0.4
Volume, ml. 200
Concentration, mg/ml 0.002
-—Legend—
¦ Final Weight
L * Loose Particulate
F « Filter D = Dish
R » Rinse P * Pan
Notes and Comments
D-4
-------
PARTICULATE SAMPLING LABORATORY RESULTS
Plant Namei SSI SITE #9 EEI Ref# 3808
Sampling Location)
Date Received! 6/12 Date Analyzedi 6/27 Reagent Box(es)i
Run Number
Run Date
12A-0UT
12B-0UT
Sample ID/Container #
F / 9-30
aaflckBcaoc
F / 9-35
Tare Weight., g.
SAMPLE WT., g.
6.6573
6.6571
6.1459
IKUIKSl
0,5112
6.7194
6.7199
6.2078
IHBI8C8I
0.5116
Sample ID/Container #
R / 9-32
R / 9-36
Tare Wt., g.
SAMPLE WT., g.
-6.1572
6.1575
6.1587
6.1550
¦BBssatna
0.0022
6.2913
6.2914
6.2920
6.28B6
lauaui
0.0027
Sum of Particulate, mg.
Total Filter Tare, mg.
Blank Residue, mg« ( 100 ml)
TOTAL PARTICULATE CATCH, mg.
513.4 514.3
508.5 507.2
0.2 ( 100 ml) 0.2
iiBoniia laniiaaci
4.7 6.9
Blank Beaker #
Final wt.,
Tare wt.,
Residue,
Volume,
mg.
mg,
mg
ml
2003
99546.3
99545.9
0.4
200
Concentration, mg/ml 0.002
—Legend-
's Final Weight
L = Loose Particulate
F ¦ Filter D ¦ Dish
R « Rinse P ¦ Pan
Notes and Comments
D-5
-------
PARTICULATE SAMPLING LABORATORY RESULTS
Plant Names SSI SITE #9 EEI Ref# 30OB
Sampling Location!
Date Received! 6/12 Date Analyzed! 6/27 Reagent Box(es)!
Run Number
Run Date
13A-0UT
13B-0UT
Sample ID/Container #
F / 9-63
IMBSeiMB
F / 9-66
Tare Weight., g.
SAMPLE WT., g.
6.8972
6,0971
6.3134
iKCKaasi
0.5837
6.8737
6.8741
6.3539
taBBSBSIB
0.5198
Sample ID/Container #
R / 9-65
R / 9-67
BIBSBSaBBB
Tare Wt., g.
SAMPLE WT., g.
6.0879
6.0B80
6.0893
6.0796
laaBiaatca
0.0083
6.2566
6.2566
6.2579
6.2527
sasocaaat
0.0039
Sum of Particulate, mg.
Total Filter Tare, mg.
Blank Residue, mg. ( 175 ml)
TOTAL PARTICULATE CATCH, mg.
592.0 523.7
579.3 516.2
0.4 < 100 ml) 0.2
12,3
7.3
Blank Beaker # 2003
Final wt., mg. 99546.3
Tare wt., mg. 99545.9
Residue, mg. 0.4
Volume, ml. 200
Concentration, mg/ml 0.002
-—Legend
« Final Weight
L *= Loose Particulate
F « Filter D = Dish
R ¦ Rinse P ¦ Pan
Notes and Comments
D-6
-------
PARTICULATE SAMPLING LABORATORY RESULTS
Plant Name: SSI SITE #9 EEI Re*# 3808
Sampling Location*
Date Received: 6/12 Date Analyzed: 6/27 Reagent Box(es):
Run Number
Run Date
2A-0UT-MMTL
2B-0UT-MMTL
Sample ID/Container #
F / 9-2
F / 9-9
Tare Weight., g.
SAMPLE WT.f g.
7.0309
7.0310
7.0319
6.3135
isasociai
0.7174
6.8443
6.8444
6*8462
6.8472
6.8488
6.1909
UBanaoi
0.6534
Sample ID/Container #
R / 9-6
R / 9-11
Tare Wt., g.
SAMPLE WT., g.
6.279B
-6.2795
6.2806
6.2770
lasessBssB
0.0025
6.1677
6.1676
6.1686
6.1652
SBBDIK8C8C
0.0024
Sum of Particulate, mg.
Total Filter Tare, mg.
Blank Residue, mg. < 75 ml)
TOTAL PARTICULATE CATCH, mg.
719.9 655.8
642.8 572.5
0.2 ( 100 ml) 0.2
76.9
83.1
Blank Beaker # 2003
Final wt., mg. 99546.3
Tare wt., mg. 99545.9
Residue, mg. 0.4
Volume, ml. 200
Concentration, mg/ml 0.002
—Legend—
* Final Weight
L = Loose Particulate
F * Filter D = Dish
R « Rinse P « Pan
Notes and Comments
D-7
-------
PARTICULATE SAMPLING LABORATORY RESULTS
Plant Name! SSI SITE #9 EEI Re-f# 3008
Sampling Location!
Date Receivedi 6/12 Date Analyzed: 6/27 Reagent Box(es)]
Run Number
2A-INLET-MMTL
2B-INLET-MMTL
Run Date
Sample ID/Container #
F / 9-13
F / 9-16
7. 1258
7.1278
7.1292
7.1039
7.1307
>.1037
Tare Weight., g.
6.3076
6.2683
MaaBIMKBI
BRBBBIBIBB
SAMPLE WT., g.
0.B1B2
0.8354
Sample ID/Container #
R / 9-14 .
R / 9-17
SBBBBBB030
7.1505
6.9641
7.1508
6.9645
7.1518
6.9697
7.1555
6.9736
Tare Wt., g.
6.1692
6.1856
SSBRBB3C33
SIBBBBCBBB
SAMPLE WT., g.
0.9813
0.7785
Sum of Particulate, mg.
1799.5
1613.9
Total Filter Tare, mg.
515.4
567.4
Blank Residue, mg, (
ml) 0.0 (200
ml) 0.4
8IIII8BBS1
¦¦¦BtrnacBi
TOTAL PARTICULATE CATCH, mg.
12B4.1
1046.1
Blank Beaker # 2003
—Legend—
Notes and Comments
Final wt., mg. 99546.3
= Final Weight
Tare wt,, mg. 99545.9
L * Loose Particulate
Residue, mg. 0,4
F « Filter D ¦
Dish
Volume, ml. 200
R - Rinse P ¦
Pan
Concentration, mg/ml 0.002
D-8
-------
PARTICULATE SAMPLING LABORATORY RESULTS
Plant Names
SSI SITE
#9
EEI Re-f# 3808
Sampling Location:
Date Receivedi
6/12
Date
Analyzedi 6/27
Reagent Box(es)i
Run Number
Run Date
4A-MID
4B-MID
Sample ID/Container
ft
F / 9-27
BBBSIBBBES
F / 9-34
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦Oil
Tare Weight., g.
SAMPLE WT., g.
6.9575
6.9579
6.9589
6.9597
6.9616
6.2755
asasasaeaa
0.6820
O.9B04
6.9805
6.9820
6.2832
aaBBBBBBBB
0.6972
Sample ID/Container
#
R / 28
R / 37
BHBBuatr
6.5157
6.5547 6.5157
6.5550 6.5170
6.5576 6.5207
Tare Wt., g. 6.5275 6.1944
sa«88aas«i
SAMPLE WT., g. 0.2272 0.3213
Sum of Particulate, mg. 909.2 1018.5
Total Filter Tare, mg. 637.5 643.3
Blank Residue, mg. ( 250 ml) 0.5 ( 225 ml) 0.5
aaBQCcanca asanas**!
TOTAL PARTICULATE CATCH, mg. 271.2 374.7
Blank Beaker #
Final wt.,
Tare wt.,
Residue,
Volume,
mg,
mg,
mg,
ml,
2003
99546.3
99545.9
0.4
200
—-Legend—
* Final Weight
L = Loose Particulate
F ¦ Filter D ¦ Dish
R = Rinse P » Pan
Notes and Comments
Concentration, mg/ml 0.002
D 9
-------
PARTICULATE SAMPLING LABORATORY RESULTS
Plant Namei SSI SITE #9 EEI Re*# 3800
Sampling Location:
Date Received! 6/12 Date Analyzed) 6/27 Reagent Box(es):
Run Number
Run Date
4A-INLET
4B-INLET
Sample ID/Container #
F / 38
F / 42
Tare Weight., g
SAMPLE WT., g.
7.0687
7.0668
7.0705
7.0719
7.0723
6.2593
IIMRRII
0.8094
6.6724
6.6723
6.6750
6.6758
6,6787
5.8362
BMBMBKia
0.8362
Sample ID/Container #
R / 40
R / 43
Tare Wt., g.
SAMPLE WT., g.
£.2713
6.2717
6.2723
6.2770
6.1318
¦¦¦man
0.1395
6.4516
6.4520
6.4550
6.1734
¦saaaiii
0.2782
Sum of Particulate, mg.
Total Filter Tare, mg.
Blank Residue, mg. ( 150 ml)
TOTAL PARTICULATE CATCH, mg.
948.9 1114.4
638.4 638.5
0.3 ( 250 ml) 0.5
IRI8KIIBI 8MKBBDSVI
310.2 475.4
Blank Beaker # 2003
Final wt., mg. 99546.3
Tare wt., mg. 99545.9
Residue, mg. 0.4
Volume, ml. 200
Concentration, mg/ml 0.002
—Legend—
» Final Weight
L « Loose Particulate
F ° Filter D ¦ Dish
R « Rinse P » Pan
Notes and Comments
D-10
-------
PARTICULATE SAMPLING LABORATORY RESULTS
Plant Namei SSI SITE #9 EEI Ref# 380B
Sampling Locationi
Date Received! 6/12 Date Analyzed: 6/27 Reagent Box(es)i
Run Number 9A-MID 9B-MID
Run Date
Sample ID/Container # F / 9-48 . F / 9-49
ciieiiibcc BBaaKaBkaa
6.9110 6.B847
6.9107 6.B849
6.9134 6.B860
6.9158 6.8904
6.9195 6.B942
Tare Weight., g. 6.2594 6.1649
aaaaaaaMaa aaMaaaaaa
SAMPLE WT., g. 0.6513 0.7198
Sample ID/Container # R / R /
0.0000 0.0000
Tare WtM g.
ciiiBiiaii ¦¦¦¦•¦¦¦)
SAMPLE WT., g. 0.0000 0.0000
Sum of Particulate, mg. 651.3 719.8
Total Filter Tare, mg, 571.8 634.4
Blank Residue, mg. ( ml) 0.0 ( ml) 0.0
¦¦¦iBiniKB mmmmmummi
TOTAL PARTICULATE CATCH, mg. 79.5 85.4
Blank Beaker * 2003
Final wt., mg. 99546.3
Tare wt., mg. 99545.9
Residue, mg. 0.4
Volume, ml. 200
Concentration, mg/ml 0.002
—Legend—
= Final Weight
L * Loose Particulate
F - Filter D ¦ Di»h
R « Rinse P ¦ Pan
Notes and Comments
D-ll
-------
PARTICULATE SAMPLING LABORATORY RESULTS
Plant Namet SSI SITE #9 EEI Ref# 3808
Sampling Locationi
Date Receivedi 6/12 Date Analyzedi 6/27 Reagent Box(es)i
Run Number
9A-INLET
9B-1NLET
Run Date
Sample ID/Container #
F / 9-50
F / 9-3
N
a
¦
B
¦
¦
I
a
0
7.0577
7.0384
7,0616
7.0641
7.0202
7.0657
7.0203
Tare Weight., g.
6.2603
6.2737
aMBMsaiti
3>azi»ioo
SAMPLE WT., g.
0.7974
0.7465
Sample ID/Container #
R / 9-1
R / 9-4
B
a
B
a
a
B
B
a
a
a
7.9634
7.7652
7.9634
7.7659
7.9660
7.7688
7.9675
7.7712
7.9691
7.7759
Tare Wt., g.
6.3060
6.1703
B
1
¦
¦
M
1
1
¦
1
B
¦ ¦¦BBKNU
SAMPLE WT., g.
1.6574
1.5949
Sun of Particulate, mg.
2454.8
2341.4
Total Filter Tare, mg.
504.7
514.1
Blank Residue, mg. ( 425
ml) 0.9
( 400
ml) 0.8
¦ IBMSIBM
BBIOElBniB
TOTAL PARTICULATE CATCH, mg.
1949.2
1B26.5
Blank Beaker # 2003
Legend—
Notes and Comments
Final wt., mg. 99546.3
«= Final
Weight
Tare wt., mg, 99545.9
L * Loose
Particulate
Residue, mg. 0.4
F ¦ Filter
D -
Dish
Volume, ml. 200
R * Rinse
P *
Pan
Concentration, mg/ml 0.002
D-12
-------
PARTICULATE SAMPLING LABORATORY RESULTS
Plant Namei SSI SITE #9 EEI Ref# 3608
Sampling Location!
Date Received! 6/12 Date Analyzed! 6/27 Reagent Box(es)i
Run Number UA-MID 11B-MID
Run Date
Sample ID/Container #
Tare Weight., g.
SAMPLE WT,, g.
F / 9-12
7,0389
7.0395
7.0419
7.0493
7.0532
6.3190
RMBCBI9BI
0,7199
F / 9-21
¦¦¦siBiai
6.5968
¦6.5966
6.5987
6.5995
6.6076
6.6068
5.9413
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
0.6553
Sample ID/Container # R / 9-15 R / 9-22
6.1481 6.2185
6.1479 6.2185
6.1489 6.2199
Tare Wt., g. 6.1440 6.2120
ummmmmmmmm ammmmmmm i
SAMPLE WT., g. 0.0039 0.0065
Sum of Particulate, mg. 723.8 661.8
Total Filter Tare, mg. 63B.8 569.4
Blank Residue, mg. < 75 ml) 0.2 ( 75 ml) 0.2
eaeasDeexe iiiBcaia
TOTAL PARTICULATE CATCH, mg. 84.8 92.2
Blank Beaker # 2003
Final wt.F mg. 99546.3
Tare wt., mg. 99545.9
Residue, mg. 0.4
Volume, ml. 200
Concentration, mg/ml 0.002
—Legend—
* Final Weight
L « Loose Particulate
F ¦ Filter D ¦ Dish
R «s Rinse P ¦ Pan
Notes and Comments
D-13
-------
PARTICULATE SAMPLING LABORATORY RESULTS
Plant Name] SSI SITE #9 EEI Re*# 3800
Sampling Location!
Date Received: 6/12 Date Analyzed! 6/27 Reagent Box(es):
Ran Number
Run Date
11A-INLET
1IB-INLET
Sample ID/Container #
F / 9-23
F / 9-26
Tare Weight., g
SAMPLE WT., g.
6.9515
6.9513
6.9528
6.9571
6.9542
6.0668
aiaiMtixi
0.8845
6,9338
6.9333
6.9362
6.9386
6.9399
6.1644
HlfiBMIBI
0.7689
Sample ID/Container #
R / 9-25
»a*aa«Bsan
R / 9-29
Tare Wt,, g
SAMPLE WT., g,
-3.9233
8.9235
8.9260
8.9277
8.9288
6.3220
¦iiiebc:
2.6013
8.6845
-8.6841
8.6862
8.6B92
8.6886
6.2932
¦13BCI3I
2.3909
Sum of Particulate, mg.
Total Filter Tare, mg.
Blank Residue, mg. ( 250 ml)
TOTAL PARTICULATE CATCH, mg.
3485.8 3159.8
515.0 569.8
0.5 ( 250 ml) 0.5
2970.3
2589.5
Blank Beaker # 2003
Final wt., mg. 99546.3
Tare wt., mg. 99545.9
Residue, mg. 0.4
Volume, ml. 200
Concentration, mg/ml 0.002
—Legend-
's Final Weight
L = Loose Particulate
F b Filter D = Dish
R ¦ Rinse P » Pan
Notes and Comments
D-14
-------
PARTICULATE SAMPLING LABORATORY RESULTS
Plant Namei SSI SITE #9 EE] Ref# 3B0B
Sampling Location!
Date Received: 6/12 Date Analyzed] 6/27 Reagent Box(es)i
Ran Number
Run Date
12A-MID
12B-MID
Sample ID/Container #
F / 9-39
F / 9-56
Tare Weight., g,
SAMPLE WT., g.
6.9955
6.9952
6.9986
7,0013
7.0077
6.3294
uauBse
0.6658
•6.8458
6.8459
6.1662
¦¦¦aaiai
0.6796
Sample ID/Container #
R / 9-41
R / 9-57
¦KilBIBBBI
6.2701 -6.2B67
6.27B1 6.2B68
6.2791 6.2B74
Tare Wt., g. 6.2707 6.2740
BBBBBB88BR CBOBXSBBBO
SAMPLE WT., g. 0.0074 0.0127
Sun o-f Particulate, rag. 673.2 692.3
Total Filter Tare, mg. 500.1 577.0
Blank Residue, mg. ( 125 ml) 0.3 ( 125 ml) 0.3
aaaaaaaaas aaaaaaaai
TDTAL PARTICULATE CATCH, mg. 92.8 115.0
Blank Beaker * 2003
Final wt., mg. 99546.3
Tare wt., mg. 99545.9
Residue, mg. 0.4
Volume, ml. 200
Concentration, mg/ml 0.002
--Legend™
c Final Weight
L = Loose Particulate
F ¦ Filter D ¦ Dish
R « Rinse P * Pan
Notes and Comments
D-15
-------
PARTICULATE BAMPLING LABORATORY RESULTS
Plant Namei SSI SITE #9 EEI Rei* 3806
Sampling Locations
Date Receivedi 6/12 Date Analyzed: 6/27 Reagent Box(es):
Run Number 12A-INLET 12B-INLET
Run Date
Sample ID/Container # F / 9-58 F / 9-60
7.0928
7,0931
7.0943 7.2265
7.0967 7.2269
Tare Weight., g, 6.2302 6.4196
iaiBXBCB OCIBUSBS1
SAMPLE WT., g. 0.0346 0.8069
Sample ID/Container # R / 9-59 R / 9-61
7.7949 <3.0133
7.7953 8.0141
7.7987 8.0173
7.6023 8.0211
Tare Wt.p g. 6.1732 6.3199
IBBCBOSB63
SAMPLE WT., g. 1,6217 1.6934
Sum of Particulate, mg. - 2456.3 2500.3
Total Filter Tare, mg. 568.2 569.1
Blank Residue, mg, ( 125 ml) 0.3 ( 150 ml) 0.3
:b*::bosb: bbbsscbbi
TOTAL PARTICULATE CATCH, mg. 1B87.8 1930.9
Blank Beaker #
2003
Final wt., mg.
99546.3
B
Tare wt., mg.
99545.9
L =
Residue, mg.
0.4
F n
Volume, ml.
200
R «=
Concentration, mg/ml
0.002
Legend— Notes and Comments
Final Weight
Loose Particulate
Filter D ¦ Dish
Rinse P ° Pan
D-16
-------
PARTICULATE SAMPLING LABORATORY RESULTS
Plant Namei SSI SITE #9 EE1 Re*# 3B08
Sampling Location!
Date Received: 6/12 Date Analyzed: 6/27 Reagent Box(es);
Run Number
Run Date
13A-MID
13B-MID
Sample ID/Container #
F / 9-80
F / 9-76
Tare Weight., g.
SAMPLE WT., g.
6,8293
6.8293
6.8329
6,8367
6.8472
6.1684
laaaBBii
0.6609
6.8442
6.8443
6.8466
6.8495
6.8612
6.1701
(BBIBHVI
0.6741
Sample ID/Container #
Busaui
R / 9-77
siiasaaii
Tare Wt., g
SAMPLE WT., g
6.0358
6.0359
6.0369
6,0303
saassaasxa
0.0055
Sum of Particulate, mg.
Total Filter Tare, mg.
Blank Residue, mg. <
TOTAL PARTICULATE CATCH, mg.
660.9 679.6
568.5 572.3
ml) 0,2 ( 100 ml) 0.0
IINIBQIN SKI3CSIICB
92.2 107.3
Blank Beaker i
Final wt., mg,
Tare wt., mg,
Residue, mg
Volume, ml,
2003
99546.3
99545.9
0.4
200
—Legend
e Final Weight
L * Loose Particulate
F ¦ Filter D ¦ Dish
R ¦ Rinse P - Pan
Notes and Comments
Concentration, mg/ml 0.002
D-17
-------
PARTICULATE SAMPLING LABORATORY RESULTS
Plant Namei SSI SITE #9 EEI Ref# 380B
Sampling Locations
Date Receivedi 6/12 Date Analyzed! 6/12 Reagent Box(es)i
Run Number
Run Date
13A-INLET
13B-INLET
Sample ID/Container #
F / 9-68
¦ ¦¦¦¦¦Ml
F / 9-74
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦m
Tare Weight*, g.
SAMPLE WT., g.
7.1303
7.1303
7.1336
7.1342
7.1396
6.4107
!¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
0.7196
7.1687
7.1692
7.1713
7.1768
7.1B27
6.5044
!¦¦¦¦¦¦!
0.6643
Sample ID/Container #
R / 9-70
R / 9-75
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦i
Tare Wt., g.
SAMPLE WT., g.
7.1308
7.1309
7.1324
7.1333
7.1374
6.2074
!¦¦¦¦¦¦!
0.9234
7.1686
7.1687
7.1695
7.1705
7.1741
6.2518
0.9168
Sum of Particulate, mg.
Total Filter Tare, rag.
Blank Residue, mg. ( 250
-------
Center for Environmental Measurements
August 29, 1990
Ms. Robin Segall
Senior Project Manager
Research & Analysis Division
Entropy Environmentalists Inc.
P. 0. Box 12291
Research Triangle Park
North Carolina 27709-2291
Dear Robin,
Enclosed are the ICAP, GFAA, and mercury results for the sludge, ash,
water, multiple metals trains samples and chromium samples frcm the sewage
sludge incinerator received on 6-20-1990 through 7-10-1990, for EPA Contract
No. 68-02-4462, Work Assignment No. 90-108, RTI Project No. 3893-108.
If you have any questions, please call me at 541-6569 or Peter Grohse at
541-6897.
Sincerely,
Kate K. Luk, Ph.D,
Ref: 3893-108
cc: W. Gutknecht
P. Grohse
J. Merricks
Post Office Box ^2154 Research Triangle Park. Noah Carolina 27709-2194 Telephone 919 541-6000
FAX: 919 541-5929
D-19
-------
RTI Project No.: 3893-108
Company : Entropy
Sample : Sludge and Ash
Analysis Method : ICAP
Sample received : 6-20-90
Report Date : 8-24-90
Table 1. Original Sample, ug/g
Total
Sample
Sample
Vol.mL
Wt.(g)
As
Be
Cd
Cr
Pb
Ni
Run 3 Sludge
100.00
0.500
ND
ND
2.25
20.1
49.6
33.8
Run 4 Sludge
100.00
0.500
47.8
0.226
3.36
23.3
57.7
35.4
Run 4 Slud(Dup)
100.00
0.501
50.7
ND
2.55
24.9
61.4
37.1
Run 5 Sludge
100.00
0.502
ND
ND
•2.12
23.7
58.6
37.9
Run 8 Sludge
100.00
0.501
ND
ND
2.62
27.2
92.3
42.0
Run 9 Sludge
100.00
0.500
ND
ND
2.44
25.6
56.5
37.1
Run 10 Sludge
100.00
0.500
45.0
0.246
3.25
26.7
69.3
47.2
Run 11 Sludge
100.00
0.500
35.2
ND
2.42
24.3
66.3
46.7
Run 12 Sludge
100.00
.0.501
37.2
ND
2.39
25.1
63.2
49.9
Run 13 Sludge
100.00
0.500
ND
0.893
2.37
22.3
62.2
43.1
Sludge Audit
100.00
0.500
64.8
0.824
4.12
22.8
65.1
43.3
Run 3 Ash
100.00
0.500
42.6
2.03
6.85
326
746
594
Run 4 Ash
100.00
0.509
36.0
2.05
12.3
399
1051
723
Run 4 Ash (Dup)
100.00
0.509
33.5
2.06
10.8
390
1106
739
Run 5 Ash
100.00
0.507
47.4
2.01
10.4
344
848
654
Run 8 ash
100.00
0.508
ND
1.95
25.3
374
B13
642
Run 9 Ash
100.00
0.501
73.7
2.20
6.93
372
806
687
Run 10 Ash
100.00
0.509
40.5
2.09
5.71
366
936
826
Run 11 Ash
100.00
0.508
33.8
2.09
6.42
365
936
805
Run 12 Ash
100.00
0.502
52.0
2.17
9.50
371
995
912
Run 13 Ash
100.00
0.510
45.7
2.04
9.28
347
856
785
Ash Audit
100.00
0.522
237
12.7
5.45
165
112
122
Detection Limit 32 0.20 0.90 1.2 17 2.4
Note : Detection Limit (ug/g) = Detection Limit (ug/mL)* Total Vol.(mL) /Sample Wt.(0.5g)
Dup = from separate digest
NO = Non-detectable, less than detection limit
D-20
-------
RTI Project No.: 3893-108
Company : Entropy
Sample : QC for Sludge and Ash Samples
Analysis Method : ICAP
Sample received : 6-20-90
Report Date : 8-24-90
Table
2. Concentration,
ug/ml
Sample
As
Be
Cd
Cr
Pb
Ni
QC
18.8
1.82
1.82
1.95
9,27
9.14
QC
19.0
2.21
2.19
1.98
10.9
11.3
QC
18.3
1.98
2.03
1,97
10.5
10.1
QC
18.5
1.94
1.94
2.05
9.79
9.93
QC
18.6
2.01
2.04
1.97
10.3
10.0
QC (Expected)
20.0
2.00
2.00
2.00
10.2
10.0
Sludge Blk
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Ash Blk
ND
0.00600
0.00600
0.00600
ND
0.0345
Detection Limit
0,16
0.0010
0.0045
0*0060
0.084
0,012
Measurement Spike Concentration, ug/mL
Sample
As
Be
Cd
Cr
Pb
Ni
Run 13 Sludge Spk*
100
10.0
10.0
10.0
50.9
50.0
Run 13 Ash Spk*
10.0
10.0
10.0
50.9
50.0
Run 8 Ash Spk*
10.0
Percent Recovery for Measurement Spike, %
Sample As Be Cd Cr Pb Ni
Run 13 Sludge Spk* 102 98.7 87.6 85.6 89.4 86.6
Run 13 Ash Spk* — 93.3 ' 92.3 90.4 94.6 90.2
Run 8 Ash Spk* 89.0
Note : * Post digestion spike
NO * Non-detectable; less than detection limit
' D-21
-------
RTI Project No,: 3893-108
Company : Entropy
Sample : Water
Analysis Method : ICAP
Sample received : 7-9-90
Report Date : 8-24-
-90
Table 3.
Original
Sample,
ug/mL
Total
Sample
Vol-mL
As
Be
Cd
Cr
Pb
Ni
Run #2 V H20
100.00
ND
0.00100
0.139
0.231
1.82
0.605
Run #3 V H20
100.00
ND
ND
0.110
0.0800
0.651
0.101
Run #3 V H20 (Dup)
ND
ND
0.109
0.0770
0.654
0.103
Run #3 D H20
100.00
ND
ND
0.0400
0.0310
0.188
0.0330
Run #3 Inlet H20
100.00
ND
0.00100
0.00900
0.0260
ND
0.0230
Run #4 V H20
100.00
ND
0.00200
0.265
0.298
2.33
0.855
Run #4 D H20
100.00
ND
ND
0.209
0.226
1.64
0.348
Run #4 Inlet H20
100.00
ND
ND
0.00700
0.0190
ND
0.0660
Run #5 V H20
100.00
0.238
0.00400
0.680
0.698
3.75
1.42
Run #5 D H20
100.00
ND
ND
0.0570
0.0800
0.475
0.195
Run #5 Inlet H20
100.00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Run #8 V H20
100.00
0.413
0.00600
1.53
0.551
5.50
2.36
Run #8 D H20
100.00
ND
ND
0.144
0.176
2.02
0.442
Run #8 Inlet H20
100.00
ND
ND
0.0150
0.0450
ND
0.119
Run #9 V H20
100.00
0.169
0.00200
0.209
0.232
2.29
0.606
Run #9 D H20
100.00
ND
ND
0.0580
0.0800
0.611
0.124
Run #9 Inlet H20
100.00
ND
ND
0.0190
0.0940
0.106
0.0960
Run #10 V H20
100.00
0.260
0.0100
0.442
0.570
6.25
2.18
Run #10 D H20
100.00
ND
0.00100
0.159
0.187
1.86
0.507
Run #10 Inlet H20
100.00
ND
ND
0.0110
0.0440
ND
0.0980
Run #11 V H20
100.00
0.285
0.0110
0.507
0.683
6.15
2.83
Run #11 D H20
100.00
ND
ND
0.183
0.420
2.12
0.581
Run #11 Inlet H20
100.00
ND
ND
0.0120
0.304
ND
0.101
Run #12 V H20
100.00
0.280
0.00500
0.663
2.95
5.81
7.08
Run #12 D H20
100.00
ND
0.00100
0.190
0.362
1.71
0.621
Run #12 Inlet H20
100.00
ND
ND
0.0130
0.153
ND
0.121
Run #13 V H20
100.00
0.209
o
o
o
o
o
0.319
0.671
2.83
1.67
Run #13 D H20
100.00
ND
ND
0.197
0.432
1.67
0.452
Run #13 Inlet H20
100.00
ND
ND
0.0220
0.362
0.0860
0.142
Detection Limit
0.16
0.0010
0.0045
0.0060
0.084
0.012
Note : ND = Non-detectable:
less than detection limit
D-22
-------
RTI Project No.: 3893-108
Company : Entropy
Sample : QC for Water Sample
Analysis Method : ICAP
Sample received : 7-9-90
Report Oate : 8-24-90
Table 4. Concentration, ug/mL
Sample
As
Be
Cd
Cr
Pb
Ni
QC
19.3
2.01
2.17
2.02
11,1
10.3
QC
20.8
2.00
2.14
1.98
11.2
10.2
QC
20.5
1.88
1.70
1.84
8.50
9.19
QC
17.7
2.12
2.29
2.15
11.9
10.9
QC
22.6
1.96
1.93
1.98
9.75
9.91
QC (Expected)
20.0
2.00
2.00
2.00
10.2
10.0
Detection Limit
0.16
0.0010
0.0045
0.0060
0.084
0.012
Measurement
Spike Concentration, ug/mL
Sample
As
Be
Cd
Cr
Pb
Ni
Run #3 D Spike*
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
50.9
50.0
Percent Recovery for
Measurement
Spike, s
's
Sample
As
Be
Cd
Cr
Pb
Ni
Run #3 D Spike*
90.0
93.3
92.3
90.4
94.6
90.2
Note : * Post digestion spike
D-23
-------
RTI Project No.: 3893-108
Company : Entropy
Sample : Sludge, Ash, and Water
Analysis Method : CVAA
Sample received : 6-20-90 (Sludge and Ash); 7-9-90 (Water)
Report Date : 8-24-90
Table 5. Hg Results
Total
Sample
Hg
Hg
Sample
Vol.mL
wt -(g)
ug/mL
ug/g
Run 3 Sludge
100.00
0.500
0.00562
1.12
Run 4 Sludge
100.00
0.500
0.00412
0.824
Run 5 Sludge
100.00
0.502
0.0119
2.37
Run 5 Sludge (Dup)
100.00
0.502
0.0104
2.07
Run 8 Sludge
100.00
0.502
0.00719
- 1.43
Run 9 Sludge
100.00
0.500
0.00621
1.24
Run 10 Sludge
100.00
0.500
0.0112
2.24
Run 11 Sludge
100.00
0.500
0.00811
1.62
Run 12 Sludge
100.00
0.501
0.00928
1.85
Run 12 Sludge(Spk)
Run 13 Sludge
100.00
0.500
0.00941
1.88
Sludge Audit
100.00
0.500
0.00499
0.998
Sludge Blk
100.00
ND
ND
Run 3 Ash
.100.00
0.500
ND
ND
Run 3 Ash (Dup)
100.00
0.500
ND
ND
Run 4 Ash
100.00
0.509
ND
ND
Run 5.Ash
100.00
0.507
ND
ND
Run 8* ash
100.00
0.508
ND
ND
Run 9 Ash
100.00
0.501
ND
ND
Run 10 Ash
100.00
0.509
ND
ND
Run 10 Ash (Spk)
Run 11 Ash
100.00
0.508
ND
ND
Run 12 Ash
. 100.00
0.502
NO
ND
Run 13 Ash
100.00
0.510
ND
ND
Ash Audit
100.00
0.522
ND
ND
Ash Blk
100.00
ND
ND
Run #2 V H20
0.00151
Run #2 V H20 (Dup)
0.00175
Run #3 D H20
0.00210
Run #3 V H20
-
0.00555
Run #4 D H20
0.00131
Run #4 V H20
0.00146
Run #5 SWI H20
ND
Run #9 D H20
0.00164
Run #9 D H20 (Spk)
Run #9 V H20
ND
Dun #0 <;ut u?n
wn
Run #10 D H20"
ND
Run #10 V H20
ND
Run #10 SWI H20
ND
Hg A1
0.111
Detection Limit
0.0002
Note : (Dup) was duplicate analysis from same digest
Spike
Cone,
(ug/ml)
Spike
%
Recovery
0.100
104
0.100
92.9
0.100
102
ND = Non-detectable; less than detection limit
D-24
-------
RTI Project No.: 3893-108
Company : Entropy
Sample : QC for Sludge, Ash, and Water
Analysis Method : CVAA
Sample received : 6-20-90 (Sludge and Ash); 7-9-90 (Water)
Report Date : 8-24-90
Table 6. Calibration Check Sample, ug/mL
Sample
Measured Expected
ug/mL ug/mL
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC
0.0924 0.100
0.212 0.200
0.183 0.200
0.218 0.200
0.222 0.200
0.203 0.200
0.187 0.200
0-285 0.300
D-25
-------
RTI Project No.; 3893-108
Company : Entropy
Sarrple : Front Half Samples of Multiple Metals Trains from Sewage Sludge
Incinerator
Analysis Method : I CAP
Sample received : 7-10-90
Report Date : 8-24-90
Table 7
Sample
Total
Vol.mL
60%
Total
Vol.mL
2-A-OUT-FH
2-B-0UT-FH
2-A-IN-FH
2-B-IN-FH
4-A-OUT-FH
4-B-OUT-FH
4-A-MI0-FH
4-8-MID-FH
4-A-IN-FH
4-B-IN-FH
9A-0UT-FH
9B-0UT-FH
9A-MID-F
9B-MID-F
9A-IN-FH
98-IN-FH
11A-0UT-FH
11B-0UT-FH
11-A-MID-FH
11-B-MID-FH
UA-IN-FH
11B-IN-FH
12A-0UT-FH
12B-0UT-FH
12-A-MID-FH
12-B-MID-FH
12A-IN-FH
12B-IN-FH
13A-0UT-FH
13B-0UT-FH
13B-MID-FH
13A-IN-FH
13B-IN-FH
13A-MI0-F
Reagent Blk 1
Reagent Blk 2
AF1
AF2
100
100
200
200
100
200
200
200
250
200
100
100
100
100
200
200
100
200
100
100
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
100
200
200
200
100
100
100
100
100
60.0
60.0
120.0
120.0
60.0
120.0
120.0
120.0
150.0
120.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
120.0
120.0
60.0
120.0
60.0
60.0
120.0
120.0
120.0
120.0
120.0
120.0
120.0
120.0
120.0
60.0
120.0
120.0
120.0
60.0
D-26
-------
RTI Project No.: 3893-108
Company : Entropy
Sample : Back Half Samples of Multiple Metals Trains from Sewage Sludqe
Incinerator
Analysis Method : ICAP
Sample received : 7-10-90
Report Date : 8-24-90
Table 8
60%
Total
Total
Sample
Vol.mL
Vol.mL
2-A-OUT-BH
100.00
60.0
2-B-0UT-BH
100.00
60.0
2-A-IN-BH
100.00
60.0
2-B-IN-BH
100.00
60.0
4-A-0UT-BH
100.00
60.0
4-B-OUT-BH
100.00
60.0
4-A-MID-BH
100.00
60.0
4-B-MID-BH
100.00
60.0
4-A-IN-BH
100.00
60.0
4-B-IN-BH
100.00
60.0
9A-0UT-BH
100.00
60.0
9B-0UT-BH
100.00
60.0
9A-MID-BH
100.00
60.0
9B-MID-BH
100.00
60.0
9A-IN-BH
100.00
60.0
9B-IN-BH
100.00
60.0
11A-0UT-BH
100.00
60.0
11B-0UT-BH
100.00
60.0
11 -A-MID-BH
100.00
60.0
11-B-MID-BH
100.00
60.0
11A-IN-BH
100.00
60.0
11B-IN-BH
100.00
60.0
12A-0UT-BH
100.00
60.0
12B-0UT-BH
100.00
60.0
12-A-MID-BH
100.00
60.0
12-B-MID-BH
100.00
60.0
12A-IN-BH
100.00
60.0
12B-IN-BH
100.00
60.0
13A-0UT-BH
100.00
60.0
13B-0UT-BH
100.00
60.0
13B-MID-8H
100.00
60.0
13A-IN-BH
100.00
60.0
13B-IN-BH
100.00
60.0
Reagent Blk 1
100
Reaqent Blk 2
100
Arl
100
AF2
100
D-27
-------
RTI Project No.: 3893-108
Company : Entropy
Sample : Combined Front and Back Half Samples of Multiple Metals Trains from Sewaqe
Sludge Incinerator
Analysis Method : ICAP
Sample received : 7-10-90
Report Date : 8-24-50
Tabl
Combined
Total
Combined Sample
Vol.mL
As
2-A-0UT-FH+BH
120.0
0.281
2-B-0UT-FH+8H
120.0
0.283
2-A-IN-FH+SH
180.0
0.421
2-B-IN-FH+3H
180.0
0.286
4-A-OUT-FH+BH
120.0
NO
4-B-0UT-FH+BH
180.0
NO
4-A-MID-FH+BH
180.0
NO
4-8-MID-FH+BH
180.0
NO
4-A-IN-FH+BH
210.0
NO
4-B-IN-FH+BH
180.0
0.173
9A-CUT-FH+BH
120.0
NO
93-0UT-FH+BH
120.0
NO
9A-MI0-F+BH
120.0
0.647
9B-MID-F+BH
120.0
0.667
9A-IN-FH+BH
180.0
0.347
9B-IN-FH+BH
180.0
0.351
UA-0UT-FH+BH
120.0
NO
118-OUT-rH+BH
180.0
NO
11-A-MID-FH+BH
120.0
0.588
11-B-MID-FH+BH
120.0
0.591
11A-IN-FH+BH
180.0
NO
UB-IN-FH+BH
180.0
NO
12A-0UT-FH+BH
180.0
NO
12B-0UT-FH+BH
180.0
NO
12-A-MID-FH+BH
180.0
0.458
12-B-MID-FH+BH
180.0
0.471
12A-IN-FH+BH
180.0
0.450
12B-IN-FH+BH
180.0
0.481
13A-0UT-FH+BH
180.0
NO
13B-CUT-FH+BH
120.0
NO
13B-MID-FH+BH
180.0
0.448
13A-IH-FH+BH
180.0
0.509
13B-IN-FH+8H
180.0
0.561
13A-MID-F
100.0
1.34
13A-MID-F Oup
100.0
1.37
Reagent 81k 1
100.0
NO
Reagent Blk 2
100.3
ND
AF1
100.0
NO
AF2
100.0
NO
Detection Limit
0.164
Combined Sample = 60% of Front Half
9. Combined Digested Sample, ug/mL
Be
Cd
Cr
Pb
Ni
ND
1.11
2.07
7.67
0.160
NO
1.12
0.212
7.76
0.155
0.00800
2.02
• 1.24
14.8
2.52
0.00700
1.43
1.21
10.4
2.22
ND
0.130
0.0430
0.595
0.0370
ND
0.C920
0.0220
0.442
0.0220
ND
0.188
0.270
1.56
0.470
0.00100
0.284
0.475
3.24
1.00
ND
0.447
0.335
2.60
0.564
0.00100
0.627
0.474
3.51
0.893
ND
0.0340
0.0180
0.348
0.0130
ND
0.0230
0.0240
0.230
0.0240
NO
1.47
0.333
12.6
0.195
ND
1.59
0.362
13.4
0.214
0.0130
2.70
2.52
25.0
4.91
0.0120
2.45
2.25
24.7
4.17
ND
0.0390
0.0200
0.312
0.0190
ND
0.0220
0.0130
0.210
NO
ND
1.45
0.349
10.3
0.234
NO
1.52
0.376
10.9
0.246
0.0220
2.11
2.50
20.7
6.62
0.0200
1.98
2.60
18.7
6.06
ND
0.00800
0.0100
0.0890
0.0140
ND
0.00500
0.00900
0.0910
ND
NO
1.23
0.212
7.63
0.207
ND
1.39
0.236
8.44
0.241
0.0130
2.61
2.35
19.3
6.03
0.0120
2.42
2.34
18.1
5.38
ND
0.0190
0.0200
0.177
0.0170
~ ND
0.0130
0.0270
0.200
0.0180
NO
1.37
0.158
10.2
0.201
0.00700
2.10
1.32
18.0
3.15
0.00800
2.52
1.52
19.6
3.44
ND
3.55
0.431
27.3
0.521
ND
3.76
0.437
27.2
0.51
ND
ND
ND
NO
NO
ND
ND
ND
SO
ND
0.0540
0.116
0.L30
0.586
0.290
0.0470
0.0980
0.118
0.483
0.243
0.0010
0.0020
0.0070
0.061
0.013
+ 60% of 8ack Half
D-28
-------
RTI Project No.: 3893-108
Company : Entropy
Sample : Combined Front and
Sludge Incinerator
Analysis Method : ICAP
Sample received : 7-10-90
Report Date : 8-24-90
Combined
Total
Combined Sample Vol.ml
2-A-0UT-FH+BH 120.0
2-B-0UT-FH+BH 120.0
2-A-IN-FH+BH 180.0
2-3-IN-FH+BH 180.0
4-A-0UT-FH+BH 120.0
4-B-0UT-FH+BH 180.0
4-A-MID-FH+BH 180.0
4-B-MID-FH+BH 180.0
4-A-IN-FH+3H 210.0
4-B-IN-FH+3H 180.0
9A-0UT-FH+BH 120.0
9B-0UT-FH+3H 120.0
9A-MID-F+BH 120.0
9B-MI0-F+BH 120.0
9A-IN-FH+BH 180.0
9B-IN-FH+BH 180.0
11A-0UT-FH+8H 120.0
11B-0UT-FH+BH 180.0
11-A-MID-FH+BH 120.0
11-B-MID-FH+3H 120.0
11A-IN-FH+BH 180.0
11B-IN-FH+BH 180.0
12A-0UT-FH+BH 180.0
128-0UT-FH+BH 180.0
12-A-MID-FH+BH 180.0
12-3-MID-FH+3H 180.0
12A-IN-FH+BH 180.0
12B-IN-FH+BH 180.0
13A-0UT-FH+BH 180.0
13B-0UT-FH+BH 120.0
13B-MID-FH+BH 180.0
13A-IN-FH+BH 180.0
13 B-1N-FH+BH 180.0
13A-MID-F 100.0
13A-MID-F Dup 100.0
Reagent Blk 1 100.0
Reagent Blk 2 100.0
AF1 100.0
AF2 100.0
Back Half Samples of Multi
Table 10. Combined
As
Be
Cd
33.7
ND
133
34.0
ND
134
75.8
1.44
364
51.5
1.26
257
ND
ND
15.6
NO
NO
16.6
ND
ND
33.8
NO
0.180
51.1
NO
NO
93.9
31.1
0.180
113
ND
ND
4.08
NO
ND
2.76
77.6
ND
176
80.0
ND
191
62.5
2.34
486
63.2
2.16
441
ND
ND
4.68
NO
ND
3.96
70.6
ND
174
70.9
ND
182
NO
3.96
380
ND
3.60
356
ND
ND
1.44
ND
ND
0.9
82.4
NO
221
84.8
ND
250
81.0
2.34
470
86.6
2.16
436
ND
ND
3.42
ND
~ NO
1.56
80.6
ND
247
91.6
1.26
378
101
1.44
454
134
NO
355
137
ND
376
NO
ND
ND
NO
NO
ND
ND
5.40
11.6
NO
4.70
9.80
pie Metals Trains from Sewage
Digested Sample, ug
Cr
Pb
Ni
248
520
19.2
25.4
931
18.6
223
2664
454
218
1872
400
5.16
71.4
4.<14
3.96
79.6
3.96
48.6
281
84.6
85.5
583
180
70.4
546
118
85.3
632
161
2.16
41.8
1.56
2.88
27.6 •
2.88
40.0
1512
23.4
43.4
1608
25.7
453.6
4500
884
405
4445 "
751
2.40
37.4
2.28
2.34
37.8
NO
41.9
1236
28.1
45.1
1308
29.5
450
3726
1192
468
3366
1091
1.8
16.0
2.52
1.62
16.4
NO
38.2
1373
37.3
42.5
1519
43.4
423
3474
1085
421
3258
968
3.60
31.9
3.06
3.24
24.0
2.16
28.4
1836
36.2
238
3240
567
274
3528
619
43.1
2730
52.1
43.7
2720
51
ND
NO
ND
NO
NO
ND
13.0
58.6
29.0
11.8
48.3
24.3
Combined Sample « 60% of Front Half + 60% of Back Half
D-29
-------
RTI Project No.: 3893-108
Company : Entropy
Sample : Combined Front and Back Half Samples of Multiple Metals Trains from Sewaqe
Sludge Incinerator
Analysis Method : ICAP
Sample received : 7-10-90
Report Date : 8-24-90
Total
Table 11.
Original
Sample,
ug
Combined Sample
Vol.mL
As
Be
Cd
Cr
Pb
Ni
2-A-OUT-FH+BH
200
56.2
ND
222
414
1534
32.0
2-B-0UT-FH+BH
200
56.6
ND
224
42.4
1552
31.0
2-A-IN-FH+BH
300
126
2.40
606
372
4440
756
2-B-IN-FH+BH
300
85.8
2.10
429
363
3120
656
4-A-0UT-FHrBH
200
NO
ND
26.0
8.60
119
7.40
4-B-0UT-FHtBH
300
ND
ND
27.6
6.60
133
6.60
4-A-MID-FHtBH
300
ND
ND
56.4
81.0
468
141
4-B-MID-FH+BH
300
NO
0.300
85.2
143
972
300
4-A-IN-FH+BH
350
ND
ND
156
117
910
197
4-8-IN-FH+BH
300
51.9
0.300
188
142
1053
268
9A-0UT-FH+BH
200
ND
NO
6.80
3.60
69.6
2.60
SB-OUT-FH+BH
200
ND
NO
4.60
4.80
46.0
4.80
SA-MID-F+BH
200
129
ND
294
66.6
2520
39.0
SB-MID-F+BH
200
133
NO
318
72.4
2680
42.8
SA-iN-FH+BH
300
104
3.90
810
756
7500
1473
9B-IN-FH+BH
300
105
3.60
735
675
7410 "
1251
11A-0UT-FH+BH
200
ND
ND
7.80
4.00
62.4
3.80
U8-0UT-FHtBH
300
NO
ND
6.60
3.50
63.0
NO
11-A-MID-FH+BH
200
118
ND
290
69.8
2060
46.8
11-B-MID-FK+3H
200
118
ND
304
75.2
2180
49.2
11A-IN-FH+BH
300
NO
6.60
633
750
6210
1986
118-IN-FH+BH
300
NO
6.00
594
780
5610
1818
12A-0UT-FH*BH
300
NO
ND
2.40
3.00
26.7
4.20
12B-0UT-FH+BH
300
ND
ND
1.50
2.70
27.3
ND
12-A-MIO-FH+BH
300
137
ND
369
63.6
2289
62.1
12-8-MID-FH+BH
300
141
ND
417
70.8
2532
72.3
12A-IN-FH+BH
300
135
3.90
783
705
5790
1809
12B-IN-FH+BH
300
144
3.60
726
702
5430
1614
13A-0UT-FH^BH
300
ND
ND
5.70
6.00
53.1
5.10
13B-0UT-FH+BH
200
ND
ND
2.60
5.40
40.0
3.60
13B-MID-FH+BH
300
134
ND
411
47.4
3060
60.3
13A-IN-FH+BH
300
153
2.10
630
396
5400
945
13B-IN-FH+BH
300
168
2.40
756
456
5880
1032
13A-MID-F
100
134
ND
355
43.1
2730
52
13A-MID-F Dup
100
137
ND
376
43.7
2720
51
Reagent 81k 1
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Reagent Blk 2
100
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
AF1
100
ND
5.40
11.6
13.0
58.6
29.0
AF2
100
ND
4.70
9.80
11.8
48.3
24.3
Note : Non-detectable; less than detection liir.it
D-30
-------
RTI Project No.: 3893-108
Company : Entropy
Sample : QC for Combined Front and Back Half Samples of Multiple Metals Trains from Sewage
Sludge Incinerator
Analysis Method : ICAP
Sample received : 7-10-90
Report Oate : 8-24-90
Table 12. Calibration Check Sample, ug/mL
Sample
As
Be
Cd
Cr
Pb
Ni
QC
20.1
1.81
1.92
1.85
9.95
9.55
QC
19.9
1.92
2.07
2.06
10,5
10.5
QC
18.9
1.97
2.02
1.99
10.4
10.1
QC
20.2
1.94
2.06
2.07
10.6
10.5
QC
19.9
1.95
2.03
1.94
10.3
9.82
QC
20.0
2.15
2.03
2.16
10.3
10.8
QC
19.5
1.99
. 2.00
2.01
10.2
10.1
QC Expected
20.0
2.00
2.00
2.00
10.2
10.0
Detection Limit
0.164
0.0010
0.0020
0.0070
0.061
0.013
Measurement Spike Concentration, ug/mL
Sample As Be Cd Cr Pb Ni
13A-0UT-FH+BH Spk* 10,0
13A-MID-F Spk* — 10.0 10.0 10.0 50.0 50.0
Percent Recovery for Measurement Spike, %
Sample As Be Cd Cr Pb Ni
13A-0UT-FH+BH Spk* 96.0
13A-MID-F Spk* 109 108 107 107 106
* : Post digestion Spike
D-31
-------
RTI Project No.: 3893-108
Company : Entropy
Sample : Combined Front and Back Half Samples of Multiple Metals Trains from
Sludge Incinerator
Analysis Method : GFAA
Sample received : 7-10-90
Report Date : 8-24-90
Table 13. Combined Digested Sample, ug/mL
Combined
Total
Combined Sample
Vol.mL
As
Be
Cd
Cr
Pb
Ni
2-A-OUT-FH+BH
120.0
0.280
0.000420
I CAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
2-B-0UT-FH+BH
120.0
0.314
0.000500
I CAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
2-A-1N-FH+BH
180.0
0.485
0.00826
I CAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
2-B-IN-FH+BH
180.0
0.368
0.00636
I CAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
4-A-0UT-FH+BH
120.0
0.0205
ND
I CAP
ICAP
ICAP
0.0314
4-B-0UT-FH+BH
180.0
0.0122
0.00890
1CAP
0.0285
ICAP
0.0184
4-A-MID-FH+BH
180.0
0.0416
0.000900
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
4-B-MID-FH+BH
180.0
0.0684
0.00161
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
4-A-IN-FH+BH
210.0
0.119
0.00101
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
4-B-IN-FH+BH
180.0
0.154
0.00176
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
9A-0UT-FH+BH
120.0
0.0130
0.000280
ICAP
0.0194
0.303
0.0235
9B-0UT-FH+BH
120.0
0.00850
ND
ICAP
0.0204
0.230
0.0236
9A-MI0-F+BH
120.0
0.478
0.000910
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
9B-MID-F+BH
120.0
0.512
0.000630
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
9A-IN-FH+BH
180.0
0.677
0.0148
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
9B-IN-FH+BH
180.0
0.638
0.0136
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
11A-0UT-FH+BH
120.0
0.0145
ND
ICAP
0.0224
0.307
0.0162
11B-0UT-FH+BH
180.0
0.00890
ND
ICAP
0.0132
0.213
0.00860
11-A-MID-FH+BH
120.0
0.419
0.000770
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
11-B-MID-FH+BH
120.0
0.442
0.000610
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
11A-IN-FH+BH
180.0
0.529
0.0211
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
11B-IN-FH+BH
180.0
0.534
0.0191
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
12A-0UT-FH+BH
180.0
0.00410
ND
0.0130
0.0109
0.0850
0.00880
12B-0UT-FH+BH
180.0 0.00320
ND
0.0136
0.0102
0.0892
0.00610
12-A-MID-FH+BH
180.0
0.320
0.000490
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
12-B-MID-FH+BH
180.0
0.349
0.000690
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
12A-IN-FH+BH
180.0
0.646
0.0143
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
12B-IN-FH+BH "
180.0
0.631
0.0145
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
13A-0UT-FH+BH
180.0 0.00620
ND
ICAP
0.0164
0.140
0.0161
13B-0UT-FH+BH
120.0
0.00680
ND
ICAP
0.0286
0.208
0.0249
13B-MID-FH+BH
180.0
0.424
0.000530
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
13A-IN-FH+BH
180.0
0.542
0.00726
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
13B-IN-FH+BH
180.0
0.613
0.00860
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
13A-MID-F
100.0
1.191
0.000950
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
Reagent Blk 1
100.0
ND
NO
ND
0.00050
ND
ND
Reagent Blk 2
100.0
NO
ND
ND
0.00050
0.00320
ND
AF1
100.0
0.0916
0.0475
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
AF2
100.0
0.0933
0.0443
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
Detection Limit
0.0027
0.00036
0.00015
0.00024
0.0012
0.0033
NO : Non-detectable; less than detection limit
D-32
-------
RTI Project No.: 3893-108
Company : Entropy
Sample : Combined Front and Back Half Samples of Multiple Metals Trains from Sewage
Sludge Incinerator
Analysis Method : GFAA
Sample received : 7-10-90
Report Date : 8-24-90
Table 14. Combined Digested Sample, ug
Combined
Total
Combined Sample
Vol.mL
As
Be
Cd
Cr
Pb
Ni
2-A-OUT-FH+BH
120.0
33.6
0.0504
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
2-B-0UT-FH+BH
120.0
37.7
0.0600
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
2-A-IN-FH+BH
180.0
87.3
1.49
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
2-B-IN-FH+BH
180.0
66.2
1.14
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
4-A-0UT-FH+BH
120.0
2.46
NO
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
3.77
4-B-0UT-FH+BH
180.0
2.20
1.60
ICAP
5.13
ICAP
3.31
4-A-MID-FH+BH
180.0
7.49
0.162
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
4-B-MID-FH+BH
180.0
12.3
0.290
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
4-A-IN-FH+BH
210.0
25.0
0.212
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
4-B-IN-FH+8H
180.0
27.7
0.317
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
9A-0UT-FH+8H
120.0
1.56
0.0336
ICAP
2.33
36.4
2.82
9B-0UT-FH+BH
120.0
1.02
ND
ICAP
2.45
27.6
2.83
9A-MID-F+BH
120.0
57.4
0.109
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
9B-MID-F+BH
120.0
61.4
0.0756
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
9A-IN-FH+BH
180.0
122
2.66
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
9B-IN-FH+BH
180.0
115
2.45
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
11A-0UT-FH+BH
120.0
1.74
ND
ICAP
2.69
36.8
1.94
11B-0UT-FH+BH
180.0
1.60
ND
ICAP
2.38
38.3
1.55
11-A-MID-FH+BH
120.0
50.3
0.0924
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
11-B-MID-FH+BH
120.0
53.0
0.0732
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
11A-IN-FH+BH
180.0
95.2
3.80
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
11B-IN-FH+BH
180.0
96.1
3.44
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
12A-0UT-FH+BH
180.0
0.738
ND
2.34
1.96
15.3
1.58
12B-0UT-FH+BH
180.0
0.576
ND
2.45
1.84
16.1
1.10
12-A-MID-FH+BH
180.0
57.6
0.0882
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
12-B-MID-FH+BH
180.0
62.8
0.124
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
12A-IN-FH+BH
180.0
116
2.57
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
12B-IN-FH+BH
180.0
114
2.61
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
13A-0UT-FH+BH
180.0
1.12
ND
ICAP
2.95
25.2
2.90
13B-0UT-FH+BH
120.0
0.816
ND
ICAP
3.43
25.0
2.99
13B-MID-FH+BH
180.0
76.3
0.0954
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
13A-IN-FH+BH
180.0
97.6
1.31
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
13B-IN-FH+BH
180.0
110
1.55
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
13A-MID-F
100.0
119
0.0950
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
Reagent Blk 1
100.0
ND
ND
ND
0.05
ND
ND
Reagent Blk 2
100.0
ND
ND
ND
0.05
0.320
ND
API
100.0
9.16
4.75
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
AF2
100.0
9.33
4.43
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
NO : Non-detectable; less than detection limit
D-33
-------
RTI Project No.: 3893-108
Company : Entropy
Sample : Combined Front and Back Half Samples of Multiple Metals Trains from Sewage
Sludge Incinerator
Analysis Method : GFAA
Sample received : 7-10-90
Report Date : 8-24-90
Table 15. Original Sample, ug
Total
Combined Sample
Vol.mL
As
Be
Cd
Cr
Pb
Ni
2-A-0UT-FH+BH
200
56-0
0.0840
I CAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
2-B-0UT-FH+BH
200
62.8
0.100
I CAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
2-A-IN-FH+BH
300
146
2.48
I CAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
2-B-IN-FH+BH
300
110
1.91
I CAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
4-A-0UT-FH+BH
200
4.10
ND
I CAP
ICAP
ICAP
6.28
4-B-0UT-FH+BH
300
3.66
2.67
ICAP
8.55
ICAP
5.52
4-A-MID-FH+BH
300
12.5
0.270
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
4-B-MID-FH+BH
300
20.5
0.483
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
4-A-IN-FH+BH
350
41.7
0.354
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
4-B-IN-FH+BH
300
46.2
0.528
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
9A-0UT-FH+BH
200
2.60
0.0560
ICAP
3.88
60.6
4.70
9B-0UT-FH+BH
200
1.70
ND
ICAP
4.08
46.0
4.72
9A-MID-F+BH
200
95.6
0.182
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
9B-MID-F+BH
200
102
0.126
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
9A-IN-FH+BH
300
203
4.44
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
9B-IN-FH+BH
300
191
4.08
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
11A-0UT-FH+BH
200
2.90
ND
ICAP
4.48
61.4
3.24
11B-0UT-FH+BH
300
2.67
ND
ICAP
3.96
63.9
2.58
11-A-MID-FH+BH
200
83.8
0.154
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
11-B-MID-FH+BH
200
88.4
0.122
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
11A-IN-FH+BH
300
159
6.33
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
11B-IN-FH+BH
300
160
5.73
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
12A-0UT-FH+BH
300
1.23
ND
3.90
3.27
25.5
2.64
12B-0UT-FH+BH
300
0.960
ND
4.08
3.06
26.8
1.83
12-A-MID-FH+BH
300
96.0
0.147
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
12-B-MI0-FH+BH
300
105
0.207
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
12A-IN-FH+BH
300
194
4.29
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
12B-IN-FH+BH
300
189
4.35
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
13A-0UT-FH+BH
300
1.86
NO
ICAP
4.92
42.0
4.83
13B-0UT-FH+BH
200
1.36
ND
ICAP
5.72
41.6
4.98
13B-MI0-FH+BH
300
127
0.159
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
13A-IN-FH+BH
300
163
2.178
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
13B-IN-FH+BH
300
184
2.58
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
13A-MID-F
100
119
0.0950
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
Reagent Blk 1
100
ND
ND
ND
0.0500
ICAP
ND
Reagent Blk 2
100
NO
ND
ND
0.0500
0.533
ND
AF1
100
9.16
4.75
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
AF2
100
9.33
4.43
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ICAP
ND : Non-detectable; less than detection limit
D-34
-------
RTI Project No.; 3893-108
Company : Entropy
Sample : Combined Front and Back Half Samples of Multiple Metals Trains from Sewa
Sludge Incinerator
Analysis Method : GFAA
Sample received : 7-10-90
Report Date : 8-24-90
Table 16. Calibration Check Sample, ug/raL
Sample
As
Be
Cd
Cr
Pb
Ni
QC
0.0497
0.0193
0.0202
0.0195
0.0244
0.0854
QC
0.0491
0.0200
0.0205
0.0189
0.0249
0.0799
QC
0.0489
0.0207
QC
0.0506
0.0193
QC
0.0489
0.0206
QC
0.0521
0.0186
QC
0.0524
QC Expected
0.0500
0.0190
0.0200
0.0186
0.0237
0.0840
D-35
-------
RTI Project No.: 3893-108
Company : Entropy
Sample : KMn04 Samples
Analysis Method : CVAA
Sample received : 6-14-90
Report Date : 8-29-90
Table 17
15%
Total
Total
Sample
Vol.mL
Vol.mL
2A-0UT-MMTL-K
176.2
26.4
2B-0UT-MMTL-K
197.1
29.6
2A-IN-MMTL-K
136.1
20.4
2B-IN-MMTL-K
192.2
28.8
4A-0UT-KMTL-K
213.8
32.1
4B-0UT-MMTL-K
111.8
16.8
4A-M1D-MMTL-K
202.5
30.4
4B-MID-MMTL-K
174.7
26.2
4A-IN-MMTL-K
163.4
24.5
4B-IN-MMTL-K
171.9
25.8
9A-0UT-MMTL-K
181.2
27.2
9B-GUT-MMTL-K
123.9
18.6
9A-MID-MMTL-K
176.6
26.5
9B-MI0-MMTL-K
174.2
26.1
9A-IN-MMTL-K
376.4
56.5
9B-IN-MMTL-K
234.9
35.2
11A-0UT-MMTL-K
108.6
16.3
11B-0UT-MMTL-K
142.4
21.4
11A-MID-MMTL-K
211.7
31.8
11B-M1D-MMTL-K
240.7
36.1
11A-IN-MMTL-K
226.6
34.0
UB-IN-MMTL-K
223.1
33.5
12A-0UT-MMTL-K
172.1
25.8
12B-0UT-MMTL-K
182.5
27.4
12A-MID-MMTL-K
203.0
30.5
12B-MID-MMTL-K
248.4
37.3
12A-IN-MMTL-K
192.7
28.9
12B-1N-MMTL-K
165.0
24.7
13A-0UT-MTL-K
176.5
26.5
13B-0UT-MMTL-K
126.6
19.0
13B-M1D-MMTL-K
213.4
32.0
13A-IN-MMTL-K
240.7
36.1
13B-IN-MMTL-K
283.7
42.5
13A-MID-F
100
KMn04 Blk
65.9
-------
RTI Project No.: 3893-108
Company : Entropy
Sample : Combined Front Half and Back Half Samples from Multiple Metals Trains
Analysis Method : CVAA
Sample received : 6-14-90
Report Date : 8-29-90
Table 18
Total
15%
Combined
Total
Combined Sample
Vol.mL
Vol.mL
2A-0UT-MMTL-FH+BH
120.0
18-0
2B-0UT-KMTL-FH+BH
120,0
18,0
2A-IN-MMTL-FH+BH
180.0
27.0
2B-IN-MMTL-FH+BH
180.0
27,0
4A-0UT-MMTI-FH+BH
120.0
18.0
4B-0UT-MMTL-FH+BH
180.0
27.0
4A-MID-MMTL-FH+BH
180.0
27.0
4B-MID-MMTL-FH+BH
180.0
27.0
4A-IN-MMTL-FH+BH
210.0
31.5
4B-IN-MMTL-FH+BH
180.0
27.0
9A-0UT-MMTL-FH+BH
120.0
18.0
9B-0UT-MMTL-FH+BH
120.0
18.0
9A-MID-MMTL-FH+BH
120.0
18,0
9B-M1D-MMTL-FH+BH
120.0
18.0
9A-IN-MMTL-FH+BH
180.0
27.0
9B-IN-MMTL-FH+BH
180.0
27.0
11A-0UT-MMTL-FH+BH
120.0
18.0
11B-0UT-MMTL-FH+BH
180.0
27.0
11A-MID-WTL-FH+BH
120.0
18.0
11B-MID-MMTL-FH+BH
120.0
18.0
11A-IN-MMTL-FH+BH
180.0
27.0
11B-IN-MMTL-FH+BH
180.0
27.0
12A-0UT-MMTL-FH+BH
180.0
27.0
12B-0UT-MMTL-FH+BH
180.0
27,0
12A-MID-MMTI-FH+BH
180.0
27.0
12B-MID-MMTL-FH+BH
180.0
27.0
12A-IN-MMTL-FH+BH
180.0
27.0
12B-IN-MMTL-FH+BH
180.0
27.0
13A-0UT-MMTL-FH+BH
180.0
27.0
13B-0UT-MMTL-FH+BH
120.0
18.0
13B-MID-MMTL-FH+BH
180.0
27.0
13A-IN-MMTL-FH+BH
180.0
27.0
138-IN-MMTL-FH+8H
180.0
27.0
13A-M1D-F
100.0
KMn04 Blk
65.9
Reagent Blk
100.0
Hg Al
24.6
Combined Sample ¦ 60% Front Half + 60% Back Half
D-37
-------
RTI Project No.: 3893-108
Conpany : Entropy
Sample : Combined KMn04 and Front Half and Back Half Samples
Analysis Method : CVAA
Sample received : 6-14-90
Report Date : 8-29-90
Table 19. Hg Results for Combined Sample
Total
Spike
Combined*
Ha
Total
Cone.
Combined* Sample
Vol.nl
ug/mL
Hg, ug
ug/mL
2A-0UT-K-FH+8H
44.4
2.25
100
2B-0UT-K-FH+8H
47.6
2.29
109
2A-IN-K-FH+BH
47.4
0.881
41.8
2B-IN-K-FH+BH
55.8
0.488
27.2
2B-IN-K-FH+BH Spk
0.100
4A-0UT-K-FH+BH
50.1
0.529
26.5
48-0UT-K-FH+BH
43.8
0.538
23.5
4A-MID-K-FH+BH
57.4
0.312
17.9
4B-MID-K-FH+8H
53.2
0.305
16.2
4A-IN-K-FH+BH
56.0
0.259
14.5
4B-IN-K-FH+BH
52.8
0.297
15.7
9A-0UT-K-FH+BH
45.2
1.73
78.2
9B-0UT-K-FH+BH
36.6
2.73
99.9
9A-MID-K-FH+BH
44.5
2.55
113
9B-MID-K-FH+8H
44.1
2.73
120
9A-IN-K-FH+BH
83.5
0.804
67.1
9B-IN-K-FH+BH
62.2
1.36
84.6
11A-0UT-K-FH+BH
34.3
2.75
94.3
11B-OUT-K-FH+BH
48.4
2.29
111
11A-MID-K-FH+BH
49.8
1.44
71.7
11B-MI0-K-FH+BH
54.1
1.29
69.8
11A-IN-K-FH+BH
61.0
0.860
52.4
11B-IN-K-FH+BH
60.5
0.881
53.3
11B-IN-K-FH+BH Dup
52.8
0.880
46.5
12A-0UT-K-FH+BH
52.8
1.41
74.5
12B-0UT-K-FH+BH
54.4
1.49
81.0
12A-M1D-K-FHfBH
57.5
1.46
83.9
12B-MID-K-FH+BH
64.3
1.44
92.5
12A-IN-K-FH+8H
55.9
1.09
60.9
12B-IN-K-FH+BH
51.7
1.20
62.1
13A-0UT-K-FH+BH
53.5
1.60
85.6
13B-0UT-K-FH+BH
37.0
2.45
90.6
13B-MID-K-FH+3H
59.0
1.11
65.5
13A-IN-K-FH+BH
63.1
0.640
40.4
13B-IN-K-FH+BH
69.5
0.710
49.4
13A-MID-F
100.0
0.0126
1.260
KMn04 B1k
65.90
0.00582
0.3835
Reagent Blank
100
0.00583
0.583
Hg A1
24.6
0.115
2.83
Spike
Rec.%
107
Combined* Sample r 15% of KMn04 Sample + 15% of Combined Front and
Back Half
D-38
-------
RTI Project No.: 3893-108
Company : Entropy
Sample : Cr
Analyte : Cr
Analysis Method : GFAA & ICAP
Sample received : 7-10-90
Report Date : 8-24-90
Table 20
Total
Total
Cr
Cr
Sample
Vol.mL
ug/mL
ug
500 K0H
680
0.00760
5.17
501 HN03
169
0.00760
1.28
502 Filter
100
0.0563
*
5.63
503 K0H
652
0-00500
3.26
504 HN03
194
0.00120
0.233
505 Filter
100
0.360
*
36.0
506 K0H
742
0.00770
5.71
507 HN03
205
0.00350
0.718
508 Filter
100
0.729
*
72.9
509 KOH
664
0.0130
8.63
510 HN03
182
0.00220
0.400
511 Filter
100
0.446
*
44.6
512 KOH
798
0.00390
3.11
513 HN03
279
0.00260
0.725
514 Filter
100
0.113
*
11.3
515 KOH
600
0.00400
2.40
516 HN03
280
0.00240
0.672
517 Filter
100
0.122
*
12.2
518 KOH
653
0.00720
4.70
519 HN03
162
0.00310
0.502
520 Filter
100
0.110
*
11.0
521 KOH
636
0.0148
9.41
522 HN03
122
0.00230
0.281
523 Filter
100
0.127
*
12.7
524 KOH
830
0.00270
2.24
525 HN03
119
0.00220
0.262
526 Filter
100
0.0350
*
3.50
527 KOH
650
0.00440
2.86
528 HN03
150
0.00180
0.270
529 Filter
100
0.0601
*
6.01
530 KOH
729
0.00400
2.92
531 HN03
340
0.00080
0.272
532 Filter
100
0.0443
*
4.43
533 KOH
680
0.0106
7.21
534 HN03
320
0.00060
0.192
535 Filter
100
0.0355
~
3.55
536 KOH
720
0.00790
5.69
537 HN03
248
0.00450
1.12
538 Filter
100
1.17
*
117
539 KOH
818
0.00720
5.89
540 HN03
206
0.00080
0.165
541 Filter
100
0.984
~
98.4
Detection Limit
0.00024
(GFAA)
Detection Limit
0.00060
(ICAP)
* : Results were obtained by ICAP
D-39
-------
RTI Project No.: 3893-108
Company : Entropy
Sample : Cr
Analyte : Cr
Analysis Method : GFAA & ICAP
Sample received : 7-10-90
Report Date : 8-24-90
Table 21
Total
Total
Cr
Cr
Sample
Vol.mL
ug/mL
u9
542 KOH
784
0.00710
5.57
543 HN03
295
0.00420
1.24
544 Filter
100
1.23
*
123
548 KOH
672
0.00870
5.85
549 HN03
305
0.00260
0.793
550 Filter
100
0.167
*
16.7
551 KOH
965
0.00560
5.40
552 HN03
300
0.00260
0.780
553 Filter
100
0.232
*
23.2
554 KOH
951
0.00830
7.89
555 HN03
255
0.00230
0.587
556 Filter
100
0.222
*
22.2
557 KOH
760
0.0139
10.6
558 HN03
288
0.00090
0.259
559 Filter
100
0.197
*
19.7
560 KOH
839
0.00300
2.52
561 HN03
276
0.00100
0.276
562 Filter
100
0.631
*
63.1
563 KOH
730
0.00310
2.26
564 HN03
155
0.00120
0.186
565 Filter
100
0.0450
*
4.50
566 KOH
710
0.00470
3.34
567 HN03
228
0.00130
0.296
568 Filter
100
0.04400
*
4.40
569 KOH
750
0.01000
7.50
570 HN03
275
0.00050
0.138
571 Filter
100
0.0326
*
3.26
572 KOH
1057
0.0191
20.2
573 HN03
283
0.0242
6.85
574 Filter
100
0.0457
*
4.57
575 KOH
858
0.0225
19.3
576 HN03
246
0.0250
6.15
577 Filter
100
0.0450
*
4.50
578 KOH
1054
0.0124
13.1
579 HN03
232
0.0814
18.9
580 Filter
100
0.0400
*
4.00
Detection Limit
0.00024
(GFAA)
Detection Limit
0.00060
(ICAP)
* : Results were obtained by ICAP
D-40
-------
RTI Project No.: 3893-108
Company : Entropy
Sample : Cr
Analyte : Cr
Analysis Method
: GFAA & ICAP
Sample received
: 7-10-90
Report Date : 8-
¦24-90
Table 22
Total
Total
Cr
Cr
Sample
Vol.mL
ug/mL
ug
581 KOH
787
0.0189
14.9
582 HN03
248
0.0147
3.65
583 Filter
100
1.98 *
198
584 KOH
802
0.00290
2.33
585 HN03
328
0.00450
1.48
586 Filter
100
0*275 *
27.5
587 KOH
953
0.00250
2.38
588 HN03
338
0.00500
1.69
589 Filter
100
0.307 *
30.7
590 KOH
727
0.00200
1.45
591 HN03
347
0.00430
1.49
592 Filter
100
0.0468 *
4.68
593 KOH
766
0.0177
13.6
594 HN03
270
0.00080
0.216
595 Filter
100
0.225 *
22.5
596 KOH
627
0.00170
1.07
597 HN03
280
0.00140
0.392
598 Filter
100
0.0178 *
1.78
599 KOH
691
0.00200
1.38
600 HN03
304
0.00130
0.395
601 Filter
100
0.0190 *
1.90
602 KOH
643
0.00470
3.02
603 HN03
272
0.00250
0.680
604 Filter
100
0.00746 *
0.746
605 KOH
656
0.0116
7.61
606 HN03
270
0.00110
0.297
607 Filter
100
0.284 *
28.4
608 KOH
711
0.00820
5.83
609 HN03
154
0.0239
3.68
610 Filter
100
1.96 *
196
611 KOH
751
0.00700
5.26
612 HN03
128
0.0378
4.84
613 Filter
100
1.53 *
153
620 KOH
853
0.00260
2.22
621 HN03
344
0.00360
1.24
622 Filter
100
0.200 *
20.0
Detection Limit
0.00024 (GFAA)
Detection Limit
0.00060 (ICAP)
* : Results were obtained by ICAP
D-41
-------
RTI Project No.: 3893-108
Company : Entropy
Sample : Cr
Analyte : Cr
Analysis Method : GFAA & ICAP
Sample received : 7-10-90
Report Date : 8-24-90
Table 23
Total
Total Cr Cr
Sample Vol.mL ug/mL ug
623 KOH 694 0.00410 2.85
624 HN03 353 0.00400 1.41
625 Filter 100 0.219 * 21.9
626 KOH 827 0.00530 4.38
627 HN03 354 0.00420 1.49
628 Filter 100 0.190 * 19.0
629 KOH 631 0.0188 11.9
630 HH03 330 0.00090 0.297
631 Filter 100 0.157 * 15.7
632 KOH 713 0.00220 1.57
633 HN03 232 0.00090 0.209
634 Filter 100 0.0193 * 1.93
635 KOH 570 0.00240 1.37
636 HN03 257 0.00100 0.257
637 Filter 100 0.0178 * 1.78
638 KOH 629 0.00900 5.66
639 HN03 291 0.00050 0.146
640 Filter 100 0.0233 * 2.33
641 KOH 800 0.00160 1.28
642 HN03 282 0.00030 0.0846
643 Filter 100 0.0154 * 1.54
644 Blk 0.00180
645 Blk 0.00080
648 Audit 0.00100
649 Audit 0.00630
Detection Limit 0.00024 (GFAA)
Detection Limit 0.00060 (ICAP)
* : Results were obtained by ICAP
D-42
-------
RTI Project No.: 3893-108
Company : Entropy
Sample : QC for Cr Samples
Analyte : Cr
Analysis Method : GFAA & ICAP
Sample received : 7-10-90
Report Date : 8-24-90
Table 24. Calibration Check Sample, ug/mL
Sample
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC
GFAA
Cr
ug/mL
measured
0.0197
0.0204
0.0203
0.0193
0.0191
0.0187
0.0193
0.0186
0.0202
0.0202
0.0195
0.0184
0.0184
0.0196
0.0191
GFAA
Cr
ug/ml
Expected
0.0186
0.0186
0.0186
0.0186
0.0186
0.0186
0.0186
0.0186
0.0186
0.0186
0.0186
0.0186
0.0186
0.0186
0.0186
ICAP ICAP
Cr Cr
ug/mL ug/mL
measured Expected
1.98
1.99
1.97
2.04
1.98
2.01
2.00
1.98
2.02
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
Detection Limit 0.00024 0.00060
D-43
-------
KEXAVALENT CH20K1JM ANALYTICAL DATA SHEET
job Name: Cr*6 at SSI Site 9 £EI Job ko: 3808
Analyst: P. Royals Date: June 18,1990
Chromim Standard Calibration Curve (with standards in approx. 0.0&M KOH)
Peak Are*
Percent
Co-*k. Deviation
(ppt) Rur. 1 Run 2 Average
0.000
0.400 2620000 2550700 2575350 I. A
1.00C 4203803 4252900 4228350 0.6X
3.00C 10151000 1C285000 10218000 0.7X
5. OX 14663000 <4836000 14749500 0.6X
Regression
Values
1650181
2721265
4327891
9683312
15038732
Recession Output:
Constant 1650181
Std Err of Y Est 447631
R Squared 0.99574
Wo. of Observations 4
Degrees of Freedom 2
X Coefficient(s) 2677710
Std Err of Coef. 123818
Peak Area Chromiur Sonple Total
Scffple Percent Cone. Vol Line Catch
ID Run 1 Run 2 Average Deviation ppb (ml) (ug)
3A
HID
7379100
7814000
7396550
2.95
2.22
798
1.772
35
HID
7932800
7903500
7918150
0.2X
2.34
610
1.896
3C
HID
14088000
14320000
1420400C
0.82
4.69
653
3.061
3D
HID
11788000
11288000
11538000
2.22
3.69
636
2.349
5A
HID
1S1C2000
14733000
14917500
1.2X
4.95
672
3.330
SB
HID
4744900
4S62900
4653900
2. OX
1.12
965
1.082
low Audit 3184600 3085000 3'.36300 1.SX
8 lank 1097100 1097100 1097100 0.0X
0.S5
•0.21
1 0.001
1 -0.000
D-44
-------
hEXAVAlENT CMOKIUM ANAIYT1CAI DATA SHEET
job Name: Cr*6 at SSI Site 9
Analyst; P. fioyalt
££! Job No: 3308
Date: June 21, 1990
Chromium Standard Calibration Curve Jwiih standards in approx. 0.08* rOH)
Peak Are*
Percent
Deviat ion
Run 2 Average
Cone.
(ppfc) Run 1
0.000
1.000 4815100 4396S0Q 4605950 4.5X
3.000 10723000 10486000 10604500 1.U
5.COO 16419000 16593050 16506000 0.5S
Regression
Values
1647112
4622125
10572150
16522175
Regression Output:
Constant 1647112
Std Err of Y Est 39620.5
R Squared 0.99998
No. of Observations 3
Decrees of Freedom 1
* Coeffic:ent
5C KID
10425000
10487000
10456000
0.3X
2,56
951
2.816
3D MID
0
0
0
760
SA KID
B375400
8622700
8499050
1.5X
2.30
802
1,847
SB KIE5
9341900
9549000
9445450
1.1X
2.62
953
2.498
SC HID
79&440Q
7976100
7950250
o.tx
2.13
727
1,548
80 Mlfc
0
0
0
766
tQA KID
79S2400
84 89400
8235900
3.1%
2.21
853
1.889
ica Kje
H7&7000
14371000
14579900
1.4X
4.35
694
3.017
lew Audit 3164600 3088000 5156300 1.5X
SUnk 1C97100 1097100 1097100 0,0*
0.50
•o.ie
1 0.001
1 *0.000
D-45
-------
kexavaleut chromium analytical data sheet
Job Name: Cr«6 at SSI Site 9 EEI Job Mo: 3606
Analyst: P. Royals Date: Jurve 22,1990
Chromium
Stancard
Calibration Curve
(hith standards
in approx. 0.C8M
KOK)
Peak Area
Percent
Regression
Regression Ojtput
Cone.
Oeviatioo
Values
Constant
1470277
(ppb)
Kirt 1
Run 2
Average
Std Err of 1 Est
138578
o.ooo
147C277
R Squared
C.99973
0.500
2692000
292*100
2806550
4.1%
2975243
Ho. of Observations
5
1.000
4815100
4396600
4605950
4.5X
448C220
Degrees of Freedon
3
o
o
o
(A
10723000
10456000
10604500
1.1X
10500106
5.000
16419000
£
•o
v*
o
o
o
16506000
0.5X
16519991
X Coefficient(s) 3009943
6.000
19815000
19150000
19482500
1.7X
19529934
Std Err of Coef. 28770.6
Peek Area Chromium Sample Total
Sample Percent Cone. Voli/ne Catch
10 Run 1 Run 2 Average Deviation ppfc> (ml) (ug)
100 HID
10425000
10487000
10456000
0.3X
2.99
827
2.469
100 MI0
0
0
0
631
3A OUT
83/5400
8622700
8499050
1.5X
2.34
830
1.938
3B OUT
9341900
9S49C0C
9445450
1.1*
2.65
650
1.722
3C OUT
7984 <.00
7976100
7980250
0.1X
2.16
729
1.577
30 OUT
0
0
0
680
5A OUT
7982400
8489400
8235900
3.IX
2.25
839
1.886
5B OUT
14787000
14371000
14579000
1.4X
4.36
730
3.179
5C OUT
*-
3
N
O
o
o
14371000
14S79000
1.4X
4.36
710
3.092
50 OUT
14787000
14371000
14579000
1.4X
4.36
750
3.266
low Aodit
: 3184600
3C88000
3136300
1.5X
0.55
1
0.001
81 ar.it
1097100
1097100
1097100
O.OX
•0.12
1
*0.000
D-46
-------
K6XAVALEHI CHRQH1UH ANALYTICAL DATA SH£ET
Job Name:
Cr-»6 at SSI Site
9
EE I
Job No: 3808
Analyst:
P. Royals
Cate: Ju>%e 25,
1990
Chromiun
Standard Calibration Curve
(uith standards in approx. C.08H
KOH)
Peak Arte
Percent
Regression
Regression Output
Cone.
Deviation
Values
Constant
(ppb)
Run 1 Run 2
Average
Std Err of Y Est
0.000
1470277
R Squared 1
0.500
2692000 2921100
28C655Q
4.1X
2975248
No. of Observations
1.000
4815100 43968C0
4605950
4.5X
4480220
Degrees of freedom
3.0C0
10723000 104860C0
10604500
1.1X
10500106
5.000
16419000 16593000
16506000
0.5X
16519991
X Coefficient(s) 3009943
6.000
19815000 19150000
19482500
1.7X
19529934
Std Err of Coef. 2877C.6
1470277
'38578
0.99973
5
3
Peak Area Chrooiun Sample Total
San-ple
Percent
Cone.
Volune
Catch
ID
Run 1
Rut 2
Average
Deviat ion
PPt>
(ml)
600
Q.SX
2.17
570
1.237
10C OUT
0
0
0
629
100 OUT
6182000
5702400
5942200
4.OX
1.49
800
\. 189
Low Audi t
3*84600
3088000
31363C0
1.5X
0.55
1
0.001
Blank
1097100
1C971G0
10971C0
o.ox
•0.12
1
-0.000
D-47
-------
CHROMIUM RADIOACTIVE ANALYTICAL DATA SHEET
Job Name: SSI, Site 9 ££I Jcb Mo. 3308
Analyst: P. ROYALS Da?«: 6/28/90
SAMPLE AVC COUNTS HIS AC-8KG/ TOTAL TOTAL PERCENT PERCENT CF
ID COUNTS 1 COUNTS 2 COUNTS -BKG INJECTED MIS 1NJ. VOl(MLS) COUNTS RECOVERY SAMPLE
BKG 53 55 54
RAO STO 4000 3982 3991 3937 1 3937 300 1181100
5AIN(0 16*70 16296 16233 16233 1 16233 1 16233 1.4X
5AWN) 56 65 61 61 1 61 248 15004 1.3X
5AIN-KCH 1656 1570 1613 1613 1 1613 720 1161360 97.4X
1192597 101.OX
SBIM(F) 4 * C3 4232 4168 4168 1 4168 1 4168 0.3X
SBIN(N) 55 59 57 57 1 57 206 11742 0.9X
591N-KOH 1589 1635 1612 1612 1 1612 818 1318616 98.8X
1334526 113.OX
5CIN(f) 25686 25778 25732 25732 1 25732 1 25732 24.8X
5CINCN) 74 67 71 71 1 71 295 20798 20.OX
5CIN-KOH 78 68 73 . 73 1 73 7W 57232 55.2X
103762 8.8X
D-48
-------
)
CHROMIUM RAOIOACTIVC ANALYTICAL DATA SHEET
Job Mane: SSI, Site 9 EEI Job No. 3808
Analyst: P. ROYALS Date: 6/28/90
SAMPLE
AVG
COUNTS
MLS
AC-BKG/
TOTAL
TOTAL
PERCENT PERCENT OF
ID
COUNTS 1
CX'HTS 2
COUNTS
-Stt
INJECTED
HIS IMJ.
VOL(MIS)
COUNTS
RECOVER*
SAMPLE
BKG
53
55
54
»AD STO
4000
3982
3991
3937
1
3937
300
1181100
SAIN(F)
41016
41433
41225
41225
1
41225
1
4122S
3,4X
8AIN(N)
172
138
155
155
1
155
283
43865
3.6X
8AIN-K0H
1092
1C50
1071
1071
1
1071
1057
1132047
93.CX
1217137
103.IX
88IN(f)
97183
96939
97061
97061
1
97061
1
97061
9.4X
5B1H(N)
121
99
110
110
1
110
246
27060
2.6X
88IK-K0H
1066
1051
1059
1059
1
1059
858
9C8193
88.OX
1032314
87.4X
8C1HCF)
401483
401690
401587
401587
1
401587
1
401587
15.2X
8c:n(H)
920
939
930
930
1
930
232
21S644
8.2X
8CIN-KCH
1929
19C6
1918
1918
1
1918
1054
2021045
76.6X
2638276
223.4X
8o:n(F)
139
148
144
144
1
144
1
1U
0.2X
80IN
-------
CHROMIUM RA01CACT1VE ANALYTICAL OATA SHEET
Jot; W«m«: SSI, Site 9
Analyst: ?. ROYALS
EEI Job Mo. 3808
Oate: 6/29/90
SAMPLE AVC COUNTS KLS AC-BKG/ TOTAL TOTAL PERCENT PERCENT OF
10 COUNTS 1 COUNTS 2 COUNTS -BKG INJECTED MLS INJ. VOL(MLS) COUNTS RECOVERY SAAPLE
6KG
RAD STD
S3 SS 54
4000 3982 3991 3937
1 3937
300 '151100
1CMNCF)
10AIN(H)
ICAlN-tOrt
315078
67
1289
315780
60
1253
315429 315429
64 64
1271 1271
10BIN(N)
1O0IH-COH
14915
84
1412
15063
96
1366
14989 14989
90 90
1389 1389
315429
64
1271
1
154
731
315429
9779
954521
1279729
24.6X
0.8%
74.6%
103.a
14989
90
1389
1
128
711
14989
11520
987579
1014088
85.9X
1,5X
1.1X
97.4X
D-50
-------
ZATKA
Chemical Consulting Company
July 25, 1990
Mr. William G. DeWees
Deeco Inc.
P.O.Box 4159
Cary, North Carolina 27519
U.S.A.
Re: Nickel speciation of incinerator dust samples (plant SSI, site 9)
Dear Mr. DeWees:
I have completed the analysis of 10 sludge incinerator dust samples as
you requested. Five of the received samples (MIDPOINT) were loaded on 85 mm
circles of quartz fiber filters and required analysis of the entire specimens.
Five were bulk-type samples (INLET), consisting of excess dust deposited on
quartz fiber filters. Portions of the dust from each filter were carefully
scraped, homogenized by grinding, and used as bulk samples. Except for the
sample 4C-IN, all filter deposits appeared reasonably homogeneous. The dust
deposit on 4C-IN consisted of two distinct layers, top brown and bottom black;
both layers were scraped and ground to obtain a homogeneous mixture. Also
included in the received set of samples was one blank filter circle. The
sample origin was plant SSI, site 9. The identification was as follows:
The samples were analyzed for nickel species by sequential selective
leaching, soluble nickel for 90 min (pH 4), sulfidic nickel for 60 min (pH 4),
and metallic nickel for 5 sec, Oxidic nickel was determined in the remaining
leached sample residue.
NOTE: The unexpectedly high sulfidic nickel found in sample 4C-MID appears
suspect. During analysis, it was noted that the deposited particulates of
this particular sample contained a significant amount of organic material
leacheable by methanol. Since this organic material was insoluble in water,
and therefore not readily wettable, it probably made the leaching of the
soluble nickel phase incomplete and produced so the sulfidic artefact. To
avoid this kind of problem, all remaining samples were washed, not only
wetted, with anhydrous methanol before the speciation analysis. The
methanolic filtrates were combined with the leached soluble nickel fraction.
Sample No.
4C-MID-Ni-F
9C-MID-N1-F
llC-MID-Ni-F
12C-MlD-Ni-F
13C-MID-Ni-F
6/4/90
6/4/90
6/6/90
Sample No.
4C-IN-Ni-F
9C-IN-Ni-F
llC-IN-Ni-F
12C-IN-Ni-F
13C-IN-Ni-F
6/4/90
6/4/90
6/6/90
Date
over ./.
463 Caesar Ave.. Oakvillc, Ontario L6J 3Z1 Tel: (416) 845-8981
D-51
-------
William G. DeWees (cont'd)
ANALYTICAL RESULTS:
Sample
Portion
Found Microgram Ni
(% rel.)
Total
%NTi
soluble
sulf idic
metallic
oxidic
total
4C-MID
full circle
4.5
(51)
1,0 (11)
<0.2
3.3
(38)
8.8
N/A
9C-MID
full circle
40.0
(92)
<0.2
<0.2
3.4
(8)
43.4
N/A
11C-MID
full circle
45.6
(91)
<0.2
<0.2
4.3
(9)
49.9
N/A
12C-MID
full circle
57.9
(96)
<0.2
<0.2
2.7
(4)
60.6
N/A
13C-MID
full circle
53.1
(96)
<0.2
<0.2
2.5
(4)
55.6
H/A
Blank
full circle
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
0.9
0.9
N/A
4C-IN
12.22 mg
1.7
(19)
<0.2
<0.2
7.3
(81)
9.0
0.074
9C-IN
22.83 mg
3.6
(20)
<0.2
<0.2
14.8
(80)
18.4
0.081
11C-IN
17.05 mg
3.4
(21)
<0.2
<0.2
12.8
(79)
16.2
0.095
12C-IN
12.95 mg
4.5
(31)
<0.2
<0.2
9.9
(69)
14.4
0.111
13C-IN
14.87 mg
6.8
(57)
0.2(1.5)
<0.2
5.0
(42)
12.0
0.081
Precision of the suds of nickel species found in the INLET bulk
dusts was checked by direct analyses for total nickel content
40-IN
13.21
mg
directly
for
total
Ni
9.8
0.074
9C-IN
28.65
mg
directly
for
total
Ni
— 23.6
0.082
11C-IN
19.47
mg
directly
for
total
Ni
20.5
0.105
12C-IN1
17.50
rag
directly
for
total
Ni
19.7
0.113
13C-IN
12.63
mg
directly
for
total
Ni
9.8
0.078
and expressed as relative standard deviation
X Total Nickel
VJZ/
Sample by speciation by direct analysis RDS, %
4C-IN 0.073, 0.074, 0.57
9C-IN 0.080, 0.082! 1.56
UC-IN 0.095,1 0.105; 7.27
12C-IN 0.111, 0.112g 0.88
13C-IN 0.080? 0.077. 2.77
D-52
-------
ENTROPY ENVIRO. INC.
P0 BOX 12291
RES TRIANGLE PK NC 2770?
SAMPLE TD: RUN #3
OPERATING CO.
SAMPLED BY:
MINE;
LOCATION;
DATE SAMPLED:
WEATHER:
GROSS WEIGHT:
OTHER ID:
CUSTOMER PROVIDED
DATE RECEIVED: 6/25/90
PO 2712-90-RRS SLUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
ASTM METHOD
AS RECEIVED
DRY BASIS
MOISTURE D2961 D3302 D3173
VOLATILE MATTER D3175
FIXED CARBON
ASH
SULFUR
CARBON
HYDROGEN
NITROGEN
OXYGEN
BTU/L8
MAF BTU/LB
D3172
D3174
D3177 METHOD
D3170
03178
D3179
D3176
02015
LBS QF S02 PER MILLION BTU
80. 297.
11. 787.
2. 457.
5. 487.
. 257.
8. 90%
1. 147.
. 817.
3. 137.
1720
XXX
59. 747.
12. 477.
27. 797.
1. 277.
45. 167.
5. 787.
4. 107.
15. 907.
8723
12081
2. 91
D-53
-------
ENTROPY ENVIRO. INC.
PO SOX 12291
RES TRIANGLE PK NC 2770?
SAMPLE ID: RUN #4
OPERATING CO
SAHPLEO BY:
MINE:
LOCATION:
DATE SAMPLED;
WEATHER:
CROSS WEIGHT:
OTHEK ID:
CUSTOMER PROVIDED
DATE RECEIVED: 6/23/90
PO 2712-90-RRS SLUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
ASTM METHOD
AS RECEIVEO
DRY BASIS
MOISTURE D2961
03302
D3173
77. 577.
XXX
VOLATILE MATTER
D3175
14. 787.
65. 927.
FIXED CARSON
D3172
1. 827.
8. 097.
ASH
D3174
5. 837.
25. 997.
SUL f UW
D3177
METHOD"A
. 207.
887.
CARSON
D317Q
9. 767.
43. 537.
HYUROCEN
D3170
1. 40%
6. 247.
NITROGEN
D3179
1. 047.
4. 637.
OXYGfc-N
D3176
4. 207.
18. 747.
STU/LB
D2013
1877
8369
?'AF STU/L0
11308
LBS OF S02 PER MILLION BTU
2. 10
D-54
-------
ENTROPY ENVIRO. INC.
PO BOX 12291
RES TRIANGLE PK NC 27 709
OPERATING CO. ;
SAMPLED BY: CUSTOMER PROVIDED
MINE:
LOCATION:
DATE SAMPLED:
WEATHER:
GROSS WEIGHT.
OTHER ID:
SAMPLE ID; RUN #5
DATE RECEIVED: 6/25/90
PO 2712-90-RRS SLUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
ASTM METHOD
MOISTURE
VOLATILE MATTER
FIXED CARBON
ASH
SULFUK
CARBON
HVUROCEN
NITROGEN
OXYGEN
D2961
BTU/LB
I1AF BTU/LB
D3302
D3175
D3172
D3174
D3177
D3178
D3178
D3179
D3176
D3173
METHOD A
D2015
LBS GF S02 PER MILLION OTU
AS RECEIVED
79 597.
12. 867.
2. 057.
S. 507.
. 177.
B. 717.
I 337.
. 957.
3. 757.
1705
DRY 3ASIS
XXX
62. 987.
10. 097.
26. 937,
. 857.
42. 677,
6. 497.
4. 66 X
IB. 407.
8351
2. 03
1 142B
D-55
-------
ENTROPY ENVIRO. INC.
PO BOX 12291
RES TRIANGLE PK NC 27709
SAMPLE ID: RUN #8 S*. 9
OPERATING CO.
SAW?LEO DV:
MINE:
LOCATION:
DATE SAMPLER
WEATHER:
GROSS WfclGHT:
OTHER ID:
CUSTOMER PROVIDED
DATE RECEIVED: 6/25/90
PO 2712-90-RRS SLUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
ASTM METHOD
AS RECEIVED
DRY BASIS
MOISTURE
VOLATILE matter
FIXED CARBON
ASH
SULFUR
CARSON
HYDROCEN
NITROGEN
OXYGEN
D2961
BTU/LB
MAF BTU/LB
D3302
D3175
D3172
D3174
D3177
D3178
D3178
D3179
D3176
D201S
LBS OF S02 PER MILLION BTU
D3173
METHOD A
76. 957.
15. 227.
2. 117.
S. 727.
10.
1.
1.
4.
207.
417.
477.
14%
117.
1924
XXX
66. 037,
9. 167.
24. 817.
. 857.
45. 177.
6. 367.
4. 957.
17. B3Y.
8348
11102
2. 03
D-56
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
PCDD/PCDF ANALYSIS (2378A) OA/QC SUMMARY
Page 2 of 2
07/11/90
FILE NAME...
CONCAL
ANALYST
SAMPLE SIZEj
ICAL DATE...
SPIKE FILE..
S902084
S902083
JA
1.00
06/27/90
SPM23710
CLIENT ID : ENTROPY
SAMPLE ID : 7A-OUT MH5
ANALYSIS DATE: 06/30/90
SAMPLE MATRIX: MM5
SAMPLE ORIGIN: n/a
TLI NUMBER : 33-30-1A-F
PROJECT NUMBER:
DATE RECEIVED.:
DATE COLLECTED:
SHIPMENT NO..
15962
06/14/90
/ /
n/a
SURROGATE RECOVERY SUMMARY (TYPE A )
NAME
AMT (ng )
X REC.
RATIO
RT
37C1-TCDD
11.8
118
31:18
13C12-PeCDF 234
11.1
111
1.56
36:12
13C12-HXCDF 478
11.4
114
0.50
40:20
13C12-HXCDD 478
10.7
107
1.19
41:28
13C12-HpCDF 789
13.3
133
0.41
47:09
FLAGS
ALTERNATE STANDARDS RECOVERY SUMMARY (TYPE A )
NAME AMT (ng ) X REC. RATIO RT FLAGS
13C12-HxCDF 789 6.5 65.1 0.48 42:26
13C12-HXCDF 234 7.1 70.6 0.49 41:16
INTERNAL STANOARDS RECOVERY SUMMARY
NAME AMT (ng ) X REC. RATIO RT FLAGS
13C12-2378-TCDF
7.7
76.7
0.75
30:29
13C12-2378-TCDD
8.6
85.6
0.78
31:16
13C12-PeCDF 123
9.1
90.8
1.56
35:15
13C12-PeCDD 123
11.2
112
1.54
36:42
13C12-HxCDF 678
6.4
63.5
0.48
40:29
13C12-HxCDD 678
7.3
73.5
1.22
41:36
13C12-HpCDF 678
6.7
66.6
0.42
44:56
13C12-HpCDD 678
8.4
84.5
0.99
46:28
13C12-OCDD
11.7
58.5
0.79
51:53
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
CONFIRMATION ANALYSIS (DB-225)
Page 1 cr i
07/11/90
FILE NAME?.
CONCAL
ANALYST
SAMPLE SIZE
ICAL DATE..
SPIKE FILE.
NAME
W105703
W901056
DM
1.00
05/15/9C
SPC2NF10
CLIENT ID : ENTROPY
SAMPLE ID : 7A-OUT MM5
ANALYSIS DATE: 07/06/90
SAMPLE MATRIX; MM5
SAMPLE ORIGIN: n/a
TLI NUMBER : 33-30-1A-F
PROJECT NUMBER
DATE RECEIVED.
DATE COLLECTED
SHIPMENT NC...
15962
06/14/90
/ /
n/a
AMT(ng ) NUMBER
DL
0.01
EMPC
RATIC
RT
FuAGS
2378-TCOO
2378-TCDF
TOTAL TCDO
TOTAL TCDF
NO
4.0
3.2
17.2
a
16
17.4
0.73 18:44
0.73
0.71
SURROGATE STO. RECOVERY SUMMARY (TYPE A)
NAME . AMT (ng ) % REC. RATIO RT FLAGS
37C1-TCDD 10.4 104 ;7:25
INTERNAL STANDARDS RECOVERY SUMMARY
NAME AMT (ng ) % REC.
RATIO
RT
FLAGS
13C12-2378-TCDF
13C12-2378-TCDD
7.8
7.5
78.3
74.6
0.75
0.78
-2%r
18:43
17:24
?_J jyj»\
C2NF RPT rev:3.01
D-70
-------
ENTROPY ENVIRQ. INC.
PO BOX 12291
RES TRIANGLE PK NC 27709
SAMPLE ID: RUN #10 t 11
OPERATING CO. :
SAMPLED BY:
MINE;
LOCATION:
DATE SAMPLED:""
WEATHER:
GROSS WEIGHT:
OTHER ID:
CUSTOMER PROVIDED
DATE RECEIVED: 6/25/90
PO 2712-9C-RRS SLUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
ASTM METHOD
AS RECEIVED
DRY BASIS
K01STURE
D2961 D3302
D3173
78. 00%
VOLATILE MATTER
D3173
14.54%
FIXED CARBON
D3172
1. 95%
ASH
D3174
5. 51%
SULFUR
D3177
METHOD A
. 21%
CAR8CN
D3178
9. 68%
HYDROGEN
D3178
1. 37%
NITROCEN
D3179
1. 1 5%
OXYGEN
D3176
4. 08%
3TU/LB
0201 5
1911
tlAF BTU/LB
LBS OF S02 PER
MILLION BTU
XXX
66. 10%
8. 86%
23. 047.
. 957.
44. 027.
6. 23%
5. 23%
18.51%
6688
1 1391
2. 18
D-57
-------
EUTROPY ENVIRO. INC.
PO BOX 12291
f?ES TRIANGLE PK NC 2770?
SAMPLE ID: RUN #12 & 13
OPERATING CO.
SAMPLED BY:
MINE.
LOCATION:
DATE SAMPLED:
WEATHER:
GROSS HEIGHT:
OTHFR ID:
CUSTOMER PROVIDED
DATE RECEIVED: 6/25/90
PO 2712-90-RRS SLUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
ASTM METHOD
hOISTURE D2961 D3302 D3173
VOLATILE MATTER D3175
FIXED CARBON
ASH
-sui-Fua
CARBON
hydrogen
NITROGEN
OXYGEN
3TU/LS
MAF BTU/LB
D3172
D3174
D3177
D3178
D3178
D3179
D3176
D2013
METHOD A
AS RECEIVED
79. 15'/.
13.95%
1. 737.
3. 17%
. 19%
9. 31%
1. 32%
1. 06%
3. B0%
1829
DRY BASIS
XXX
66. 887.
8. 34%
24. 78%
. 89%
44. 62%
6. 31%
5. 08%
18. 32%
8768
11656
LBS OF S02 PER MILLION BTU
2. 03
D-58
-------
DATE :
CLIENT ID :
P.O. NUMBER :
TLI PROJECT No.:
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
801-10 CAPITOLA DRIVE
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27713
Phone: (919) 544-5729
Fax: (919) 544-5491
* 16 JULY 1990
* ENTROPY ENVIRONMENTALISTS, INC.
* 3808 T-7
* 15962
4
CASE NARRATIVE
MODEL 8290X
¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥
¥ ¥
¥ ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES FOR THE PRESENCE OF ¥
¥ ¥
¥ POLYCHLORINATED DIBENZO-p-DIOXINS ¥
¥ ¥
¥ AND ¥
¥ ¥
¥ DIBENZOFURANS ¥
¥ ¥
¥ BY ¥
¥ ¥
¥ HIGH-RESOLUTION GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY / ¥
¥ HIGH-RESOLUTION MASS SPECTROMETRY ¥
¥ ¥
¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥
D-59
-------
Five KM5 samples were received from ENTROPY ENVIRONMENTALISTS,
INC. in good condition June 12, 1990 and stored in a refrigerator
at 4°C. The samples were extracted and analyzed according to
procedures described in the Triangle Labs User Manual provided
with this data package. Any particular difficulties encountered
during the sample handling by Triangle Labs will be discussed in
the QA/QC remark section below.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Samples
A laboratory method blank — identified as the TLI Blank -- is
prepared along with the batch of samples.
QA/QC Remarks
The release of this particular set of ENTROPY ENVIRONMENTALISTS,
INC. analytical data by Triangle Labs was authorized by the
Quality Assurance Officer who has reviewed each sample data
package individually following a series of inspections/reviews
conducted at two other levels of the data production line. When
applicable, general deviations from acceptable QA/QC requirements
are identified below. Comments on the effect of these devia-
tions upon . the validity and reliability of the results can be
obtained from the User Manual (Data Quality Objectives; Section
5). Specific QA/QC Problems Associated with this Particular
Project are:
Sample Preparation Laboratory: None
Mass Spectrometry: None
Data Review:
Analytes, 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 - HpCDD an OCDD, were found in the TLI
blank. The concentrations found are not greater than one-third
the calculated method quantitation limit (TMQL) for the associat-
ed samples. Blank contamination levels of one-third TMQL or less
are acceptable under TLI guidelines, as discussed in section
5.1.3.2 of the Data User's Manual.
A high percent recovery was found for the 1234789-13C12-HpCDF
labeled surrogate standard for sample 7A-OUT MM5 (TLI #
33-30-1A-F).
No surrogate prespike was added for XAD Resin sample Audit # 2176
(TLI # 33-30-5).
Due to sensitivity differences between analyses of sample
7C-OUT-MM5 (TLI # 33-30-3A-D), more TCDD peaks were detected on
the DB-5 column analysis. A reliable estimate for Total TCDD can
be obtained from the DB-5 analysis for this sample.
Samples 7A-OUT MM5 (TLI # 33-30-1A-F) and 7A-MID MM5 (TLI #
33-30-2A-F) show saturated signals in the Total MCDF and DCDD
mass channels. The values given for these congener groups are
D-60
-------
minimum estimates of the total amount in the samples.
Addendum to Section 4.6 of the Data User's Manual
Effective December 15, 1989, Triangle Laboratories has adopted a
new procedure for calculating the analyte specific detection
limits. Under this new policy two representative noise height
determinations are summed and multiplied by an empirically deter-
mined factor before the detection limit equation given in Section
4.6 of the Data User's Manual is applied. The effect of this
procedure is to increase DB-225 analyses detection limits by a
factor of 3.5, and DB-5 analyses detection limits by a factor of
5. This procedure will result in a more accurate estimate of
detection limits.
The revised formula for DB-225 analyses is:
DB-a29 2.5 * (3.5 * HaJ_) * Q*3
DLoi.
A*., * RRF * W
3.5 * Hajl = Anot..
The revised formula for DB-5 analyses is;
2.5 * (5 * Hoi) * Qaj"
AP;J * RRF * W
5 * Hal_ *»
The symbols are defined in Section 4.6 of the Data User's Manual.
As an example, consider a DB-225 confirmation analysis of a 10 g
sample. The internal standard spike is 2000 pg, the 13C12-
2,3,7,8-TCDF internal standard area is 12000 area units, the RRF
*is 1.215 and the noise height is 11 units. The 2,3,7,8-TCDF
detection limit is:
DD-223 2.5 * (3.5 * 11) * 2000
DX>j«c Dr * ————————————————— — ——————— — 1.3 ppt
12000 * 1.215 * 10.0
Should ENTROPY ENVIRONMENTALISTS, INC. have any questions or
comments to formulate regarding this data package please feel
free to contact us.
D-61
-------
D-62
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC. Page 1 of 2
PCDD/PCDF ANALYSIS (2378A) 07/11/90
FILE NAME..?.
S902079
CLIENT
ID
. . . • ENTROPY
TLI NUMBER :
n/a
CONCAL
S902071
SAMPLE
ID
: TLT
BLANK
ANALYST
AO
ANALYSIS
DATE: 06/29/90
PROJECT NUMBER:
15962
SAMPLE SIZE..
1.00
SAMPLE
MATRIX: n/a
DATE RECEIVED.:
/ /
ICAL DATE
06/27/90
SAMPLE
ORIGIN: n/a
DATE COLLECTED:
/ /
SPIKE FILE...
SPM23710
SHIPMENT NO...:
n/a
NAME
AMT(ng )
NUMBER
DL
EMPC
RATIO RT
FLAGS
2378-TC0D
ND
0.01
12378-PeCDD
ND
0.008
123478-HxCDD
NO
0.01
123678-HxCDD
ND
0.01
123789-HxCDD
ND
0.02
1234678-HpCDD
0.07
0.99 46:29
OCDO
1.0
0.87 51:54
2378-TCDF
ND
0.008
12378-PeCDF
ND
0.008
23478-PeCDF
ND
0.01
123478-HxCDF
ND
0.01
123678-HxCDF
ND
0.008
234678-HxCDF
ND
0.01
123789-HxCDF
ND
0.02
1234678-HpCDF
ND
0.01
1234789-HpCOF
ND
0.02
OCDF
ND
0.03
TOTAL MCDD
ND
0.003
TOTAL DCDD
ND
0.005
TOTAL TriCDO
ND
0.008
TOTAL TCDD
ND
0.01
TOTAL PeCDD
ND
0.008
TOTAL HxCOD
ND
0.01
TOTAL HpCDO
0.10
2
1.08
TOTAL MCDF
ND
0,003
TOTAL DCDF
ND
0.01
TOTAL TriCDF
ND
0.005
TOTAL TCDF
ND
0.008
TOTAL PeCOF
ND
0.01
TOTAL HxCDF
ND
0.01
TOTAL HpCDF
ND
0.01
UhJZsix M237_RPT rev: 3.03
D-63
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
PCDD/PCDF ANALYSIS (2376A) QA/QC SUMMARY
Page 2 of 2
07/11/90
FILE NAME.
CONCAL
ANALYST
SAMPLE SIZ?
ICAL DATE..
SPIKE FILE.
S902079
S902071
AO
1.00
06/27/90
SPM23710
CLIENT ID : ENTROPY
TLI NUMBER : n/a
SAMPLE 10 :
ANALYSIS DATE:
SAMPLE MATRIX:
SAMPLE ORIGIN:
TLI BLANK
06/29/90
n/a
n/a
PROJECT NUMBER
DATE RECEIVED.
DATE COLLECTED
SHIPMENT NO...
15962
/ /
/ /
n/a
SURROGATE RECOVERY SUMMARY (TYPE A )
NAME AMT (ng ) % REC.
RATIO
RT
FLAGS
37C1-TCDD 11.6
13C12-PeCDF 234 11.5
13C12-HXCDF 478 10.3
13C12-HXCDD 478 9.0
13C12-HpCDF 789 10.9
116
115
103
89.7
109
1.55
0.51
1.17
0.44
31:17
36:12
40:20
41:28
47:09
ALTERNATE STANDARDS RECOVERY SUMMARY (TYPE A )
NAME AMT (ng ) % REC. RATIO RT FLAGS
13C12-HXCDF 789 7.1 71.4 0.50 42:26
13C12-HXCDF 234 8.2 81.7 0.52 41:16
INTERNAL STANDARDS RECOVERY SUMMARY
NAME
AMT (ng )
% REC.
RATIO
RT
13C12-2378-TCDF
7.4
73.8
0.74
30:29
13C12-2378-TCDD
8.0
80.1
0.79
31:16
13C12-PeCDF 123
8.8
87.5
1.52
35:14
13C12-PeCDD 123
12.8
128
1.53
36:42
13C12-HXCDF 678
6.9
69.0
0.51
40:29
13C12-HXCDD 678
8.6
86.3
1.19
41:36
13C12-HpCDF 678
7.2
71.9
0.45
44:56
13C12-HpCDD 678
8.9
89.3
1.01
46:28
13C12-OCDD
10.7
53.6
0.87
51:53
FLAGS
Ujum
M237 RPT rev:3.03
D-64
-------
RIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
PCDO/PCOF ANALYSIS (2378A)
Page 1 of 2
07/11/90
FILE NAME..
CONCAL
ANALYST
SAMPLE SIZE
ICAL DATE..
SPIKE FILE.
S208504 CLIENT ID : ENTROPY TLI NUMBER : 33-30-5
S902083 SAMPLE ID : AUDIT #2176
JA ANALYSIS DATE: 06/30/90 PROJECT NUMBER: 15962
1.00 SAMPLE MATRIX: XAD RESIN DATE RECEIVED.: 06/14/90
06/27/90 SAMPLE ORIGIN: n/a DATE COLLECTED: / /
SPM23710 SHIPMENT NO...: n/a
NAME
AMT(ng )
NUMBER
DL
EMPC
RATIO
RT
FLAGS
2378-TCDD
1.2
0.81
31:16
12378-PeCDD
2.7
1.77
36:42
123478-HxCDD
6.9
1.25
41:30
123678-HxCDD
6.0
1.17
41:37
123789-HxCDD
14.6
1.20
42:05
IK
1234678-HpCDD
34.4
0.97
46:29
0
OCDD
71. 1
0.84
51:53
6_
2378-TCDF
10.0
0.72
30:32
12378-PeCDF
3.2
1.42
35:16
23478-PeCDF
5.8
1.61
36:13
123478-HxCDF
17.4
1.11
40:20
123678-HxCDF
7.9
1.14
40:30
234678-HxCDF
8.1
1.13
41:17
123789-HxCDF
ND
0.2
1234678-HpCDF
28.1
0.91
44:56
1234789-HpCDF
1.0
1.03
47: 10
OCDF
11.9
0.88
52:08
TOTAL MCDD
ND
0.03
TOTAL DCDD
0.51
1
1.0
1.64
TOTAL TriCDD
8.3
7
8.5
1.04
TOTAL TCDD
17.6
10
18.4
0.78
TOTAL PeCDD
30.7
¦ 1
1.60
TOTAL HxCDD
78.6
7
1.19
TOTAL HpCDD
68.4
2
0.97
TOTAL MCDF
ND
0.03
TOTAL DCDF
3.7
3
6.2
6.21
TOTAL TriCDF
35.9
11
1.08
TOTAL TCDF
53.0
13
56.6
0.73
TOTAL PeCDF
58.9
12
64.3
1.59
TOTAL HxCDF
78.5
8
81.8
1.11
TOTAL HpCDF
45.4
4
0.95
KV
M237 RPT rev:3.03
D-65
4
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
PCDO/PCDF ANALYSIS (2378A) QA/QC SUMMARY
Page 2 of 2
07/11/90
FILE NAME..
CONCAL
ANALYST
SAMPLE SIZE
ICAL DAT P..
SPIKE FILE.
S208504 CLIENT ID : ENTROPY TLI NUMBER : 33-30-5
S902083 SAMPLE ID....: AUDIT #2176
JA ANALYSIS DATE: 06/30/90 PROJECT NUMBER: 15962
1.00 SAMPLE MATRIX: XAD RESIN DATE RECEIVED.: 06/14/90
06/27/90 SAMPLE ORIGIN: n/a DATE COLLECTED: / /
SPM23710 SHIPMENT NO...: n/a
ALTERNATE STANDARDS RECOVERY SUMMARY (TYPE A )
NAME AMT (ng ) X REC. RATIO RT FLAGS
13C12-HxCDF 789 7.6 76.1 0.45 42:26
13C12-HxCDF 234 9.7 97.2 0.47 41:16
INTERNAL STANDARDS RECOVERY SUMMARY
NAME AMT (ng ) % REC. RATIO RT FLAGS
13C12-2378-TCDF
7.0
70.5
0.74
30:29
13C12-2378-TCDD
8.0
79.7
0.81
31:16
13Cl2-PeCDF 123
6.3
63.2
1.57
35:15
13C12-PeCDD 123
7.4
73.9
1.40
36:42
13C12-HXCDF 678
7.7
77.2
0.48
40:29
13C12-HXCDD 678
7.6
76.0
1.20
41:36
13C12-HpCDF 678
8.5
84.7
0.39
44:55
13C12-HpCDD 678
9.2
92. 1
1.04
46:28
13C12-OCDD
9.4
47.2
0.97
51:52
U±J3*\ M237_RPT rev:3.03
D-66
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC. Page 1 of 1
CONFIRMATION ANALYSIS (DB-225) 07/11/90
FILE NAME^...
W105707
CLIENT ID : ENTROPY
TLI NUMBER :
33-30-6
CONCAI ....
W901056
SAMPLE ID : AUDIT #2176
ANALYST
DM
ANALYSIS DATE: 07/06/90
PROJECT NUMBER:
" 5962
SAMPLE SIZE..
1.00
SAMPLE MATRIX: MM5
DATE RECEIVED.:
06/14/90
ICAL DATE
05/15/90
SAMPLE ORIGIN: n/a
DATE COLLECTED:
/ /
SPIKE FILE...
SPC2NF10
SHIPMENT NO...:
n/a
NAME
AMT(ng )
NUMBER DL EMPC
RATIO RT
FLAGS
2378-TCDD
2.3
0.78 17:25
2378-TCDF
1.5
0.75 18:44
TOTAL TCDD
21.2
16
0.78
TOTAL TCOF
33.4
20
0.74
SURROGATE STD
. RECOVERY SUMMARY (TYPE A)
NAME
AMT (ng )
% REC. RATIO
RT
FLAGS
37C1-TCDD
0.02 0.24
17:24
INTERNAL STANDAROS RECOVERY SUMMARY
NAME
AMT (ng )
% REC. RATIO
RT
FLAGS
13C12-2378-TCDF 6.8 68.3 0.76 18:43
13C12-2378-TCD0 6.9 69.3 0.79 17:23
<^2 C2NF_RPT rev:3.01
D-67
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
PCDD/PCDF ANALYSIS (2378A)
Page 1 of 2
07/11/90
FILE NAME..
CONCAL
ANALYST '
SAMPLE SIZE
ICAL DATE..
SPIKE FILE.
S902084
S902083
JA
1.00
06/27/90
SPM23710
CLIENT ID : ENTROPY
SAMPLE ID : 7A-OUT MM5
ANALYSIS DATE: 06/30/90
SAMPLE MATRIX: MM5
SAMPLE ORIGIN: n/a
TLI NUMBER : 33-30-1A-F
PROJECT NUMBER:
DATE RECEIVED.:
DATE COLLECTED:
SHIPMENT NO...:
15962
06/14/90
/ /
n/a
NAME
AMT(ng )
NUMBER
OL
EMPC
RATIO
RT
F.AGS
2378-TC0D
ND
0.01
12378-PeCDD
EMPC
0.02
123478-HxCDD
ND
0.02
123678-HxCDD
ND
0.02
123789-HxCOD
.0.08
1.38
42:06
1234678-HpCDD
0.85
1.11
46:30
X
OCDD
3.9
0.87
51:53
_s_
2378-TCDF
7.0
0.72
30:30
12378-PeCDF
0.72
1.65
35: 16
23478-PeCDF
3.4
1.62
36:13
123478-HxCDF
0.76
1.15
40:20
123678-HxCDF
0.27
1. 10
40:30
234678-HxCDF
0.55
1.11
41:17
123789-HxCDF
ND
0.02
1234678-HpCDF
0.31
0.89
44:56
1234789-HpCDF
0.03
1 .12
47:11
OCDF
0.17
0.86
£2:08
TOTAL MCDD
11.8
2
2.97
TOTAL OCDD
6.3
5
189
1.60
"3~
TOTAL TriCDD
13.4
5
13.5
1.02
TOTAL TCDD
3.3
2
3.4
0.78
TOTAL PeCDD
0.15
3
0.29
1.66
TOTAL HxCDD
0.46
3
0.56
1.31
TOTAL HpCDD
1.6
2
1.04
—
TOTAL MCOF
66.6
2
200
3.46
J?
TOTAL DCDF
84.6
4
132
6.68
TOTAL TMCDF
33.2
9
33.3
1.03
TOTAL TCDF
24.5
12
24.5
0.72
TOTAL PeCDF
14.6
11
15.3
1.58
TOTAL HxCDF
TOTAL HpCDF
3.0
0.57
8
4
3.2
1. 12
0.97
M237__RPT rev: 3. 03
D-68
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
PCDO/PCDF ANALYSIS (2378A)
Page 1 of 2
0T/13/9C
FIIF NAMF
S208501
CLIENT ID
-NTRDPY
Tl T NUMRFR.
33-30-2A
CONCAL.
SS02083
SAMPLE ID.
. • 7A-MID MM5
ANALYST
JA
ANALYSIS DATE:
06/30/90
PROJECT
NUMBER:
15962
SAMPLE
SIZE..
1.00
SAMPLE MATRIX:
MM5
DATE RECEIVED.:
06/14/90
ICAL DATE
06/27/90
SAMPLE ORIGIN:
n/a
DATE COLLECTED:
/ /
SPIKE
FILE...
SPM23710
SHIPMENT
NO...:
n/a
NAME
AMTCng )
NUMBER
DL
EMPC
RATIO
RT
FLAGS
2378-TCDD
ND
0.03
12378-
PeCDD
ND
0.04
123478
-HxCDD
ND
0.08
123678
-HxCCD
ND
0.06
123789
-HxCDD
ND
0.08
1234678-HpCDO
3.5
1.05
46:28
jE
OCDO
18.5
0.86
51:53
2378-TCDF
26.7
0.71
30:29
' 2378-
PeCDF
3.4
1.55
35:15
23478-
PeCDF
14.5
1.61
36: 13
123478
-HxCDF
3.6
1.10
40:19
123678
-HxCDF
0.76
1.21
40:29
234678
-HxCDF
2.3
1 .07
41:16
123789
-HxCDF
ND
0.09
1234678-HpCDF
EMPC
1 .7
1234789-HpCOF
ND
0. 1
OCDF
3.3
1 .01
52:07
TOTAL
MCDD
33.4
2
33.4
3.09
TOTAL
DCDD
17.6
4
698
1.61
X
TOTAL
TriCDD
53.3
8
1.03
—
TOTAL
TCDD
14. 1
3
14.3
0.76
TOTAL
PeCDD
0.43
2
1.70
TOTAL
HXCDD
0.96
2
1.2
1.28
TOTAL
HpCDD
6.5
2
1.03
—
TOTAL
MCDF
599
4
601
3.21
$_
TOTAL
OCDF
373
9
378
6.27
TOTAL
TriCOF
112
8
123
1.08
— .
TOTAL
TCDF
89.8
12
93.7
0.72
TOTAL
PeCDF
72.1
12
73.2
1.60
TOTAL
HxCDF
12.9
6
14. 1
1.16
TOTAL
HpCDF
1.2
2
3.4
1.05
2J'AJ%d
M237 RPT rev:3.03
D-71
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC. Page 2 of 2
PCDD/PCDF ANALYSIS (2378A) QA/GC SUMMARY C7/13/90
FILE NAME...
CONCAl
ANALYST
SAMPLE SIZ£.
ICAL DATE...
SPIKE FILE..
S208501
S902083
JA
1.00
06/27/90
SPM23710
CLIENT ID :
SAMPLE ID :
ANALYSIS DATE:
SAMPLE MATRIX:
SAMPLE ORIGIN:
ENTROPY
7A-MI0 MM5
06/30/9C
MM5
n/a
LI NUMBER : 33-30-2A-F
PROJECT NUMBER:
DATE RECEIVED.:
DATE COLLECTED:
SHIPMENT NO...:
15962
06/14/90
/ /
n/a
SURROGATE RECOVERY SUMMARY (TYPE A )
NAME AMT (ng ) % REC.
RATIO
RT
FLAGS
37C1-TCDD
13C12-PeCDF
13C12-HxCDF
13C12-HXCDD
13C12-HpCDF
234
478
478
789
11.9
10.9
12.6
11.2
12.2
119
109
126
112
122
1.52
0.48
1.20
0.41
31:18
36: 12
40: 19
41:28
47:08
ALTERNATE STANDARDS RECOVERY SUMMARY (TYPE A )
NAME AMT (ng ) % REC. RATIO RT FLAGS
13C12-HxCDF 789 6.5 65.1 0.48 42:25
13C12-HxCDF 234 7.4 74.0 0.50 41:16
INTERNAL STANDARDS RECOVERY SUMMARY
NAME
AMT (ng )
% REC.
RATIO
RT FLAGS
13C12-2378-TCDF
7.2
72.4
0.75
30:28
13C12-2378-TCDD
7.4
74.2
0.79
31:16
13C12-PeCDF 123
5.8
58.5
1.56
35:14
13C12-PeCDD 12-3
6.6
66.5
1.56
36:41
13C12-HXCDF 678
6.4
64.3
0.46
40:29
13C12-HXCDD 678
7.5
74.6
1 .20
41:36
13C12-HpCDF 678
5.7
57.1
0.39
44: 55
13C12-HpCDD 678
6 „ 8
68.3
1.01
46:27
13C12-OCDD
8.6
43.1
0.91
51:52
:
1 /<> f*o \
M237_RPT rev:3.
D-72
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
CONFIRMATION ANALYSIS (DB-225)
Page 1 of 1
07/11/90
FILE NAME..
CONCAL
ANALYST
SAMPLE SIZE
ICAL DATE..
SPIKE FILE.
NAME
W105704
W901056
OM
1.00
05/15/90
SPC2NF10
CLIENT ID : ENTROPY
SAMPLE ID : 7A-MID MM5
ANALYSIS DATE: 07/06/90
SAMPLE MATRIX: MM5
SAMPLE ORIGIN: n/a
TLI NUMBER : 33-30-2A-F
PROJECT NUMBER
DATE RECEIVED.
DATE COLLECTED
SHIPMENT NO...
AMT(ng ) NUMBER
DL EMPC
0.G08
RATIO
RT
15962
06/14/90
/ /
n/a
FLAGS
2378-TCDD
2378-TCDF
TOTAL TCDD
TOTAL TCDF
ND
15.5
13.2 1
73.4 19
0.75 18:45
0.74
0.72
SURROGATE STD. RECOVERY SUMMARY (TYPE A)
NAME AMT (ng ) % REC.
37C1-TCDD 10.4 104
RATIO
RT FLAGS
17:26
INTERNAL STANDARDS RECOVERY SUMMARY
NAME AMT (ng ) % REC.
RATIO
RT
FLAGS
13C12-2378-TCDF
13C12-2378-TCDD
7.0
7.2
69.8
71.6
0.75
0.77
18:43
17:25
4^
C2NF RPT rev:3.01
D-73
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
PCDD/FCDF ANALYSIS (2378A)
Page 1 cr 2
07/11/90
FILE NAME..
CONCAL
ANALYST
SAMPLE SIZE
ICAL OATE..
SPIKE FILE.
S208502
S902083
JA
1.00
06/27/90
SPM23710
CLIENT ID : ENTROPY
SAMPLE ID : 7C-OUT MM5
ANALYSIS DATE: 06/30/90
SAMPLE MATRIX: MM5
SAMPLE ORIGIN: n/a
TLI NUMBER
PROJECT NUMBER
DATE RECEIVED.
DATE COLLECTED
SHIPMENT NO...
33-30-3A-D
15962
06/14/9C
/ /
n/a
NAME AMT(ng ) NUMBER DL EMPC RATIO RT FLAGS
2378-TCDD
ND
0.02
12378-PeCDD
ND
0.02
123478-HxCDD
ND
0,04
123678-HxCDD
ND
0.03
123789-HxCDD
ND
0.04
1234678-HpCDD
EMPC
0.12
e.
OCDD
0.93
0.81
51:53
G>
2378-TCDF
1.1
0.71
30:29
12378-PeCDF
0.06
1.45
35:15
23478-PeCDF
0.23
1.63
36:13
123478-HxCDF
0.05
1.30
40:20
123678-HXCDF
ND
0.02
234678-HxCOF
ND
0.03
123789-HxCDF
ND
0.04
123467S-HpCDF
0.05
1.04
44:56
1234789-HpCDF
ND
0.04
OCDF
ND
0.06
—
TOTAL MCDD
ND
0.008
TOTAL DCDD
51.4
3
51.4
1.54
TOTAL TriCDD
1.7
4
1.7
1.03
—
TOTAL TCDD
0.29
1
0.68
TOTAL PeCDD
ND
0.02
TOTAL HxCDD
ND
0.03
TOTAL HpCDD
0.09
1
0.21
0.90
—
TOTAL MCDF
EMPC
2.9
TOTAL DCDF
6.9
5
11.1
6.25
TOTAL TnCDF
7.3
8
7.4
1 .07
—
TOTAL TCDF
4. 7
11
4.8
0.69
TOTAL PeCDF
1.4
7
1.5
" . 62
TOTAL HxCDF
0.12
2
: .24
TOTAL HpCDF
0.06
1
1 .04
—
M237_RPT rev: 3. 03
D-74
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
PCDO/PCDF ANALYSIS (2378A) GA/QC SUMMARV
Page 2 of 2
07/11/90
FILE NAME..
CONCAL
ANALYST
SAMPLE SIZE
ICAL DATE..
SPIKE FILE.
S208502
S902083
JA
1.00
06/27/90
SPM23710
CLIENT ID :
SAMPLE ID :
ANALYSIS DATE:
SAMPLE MATRIX:
SAMPLE ORIGIN:
ENTROPY
7C-OUT MM5
06/30/90
MM5
n/a
TLI NUMBER : 33-30-3A-D
PROJECT NUMBER
DATE RECEIVED.
DATE COLLECTED
SHIPMENT NO...
15962
C-6/14/90
/ /
n/a
SURROGATE RECOVERY SUMMARY (TYPE A )
NAME AMT (ng ) % REC.
RATIO
RT
FLAGS
37C1-TCDD 11.2
l3C12-PeCDF 234 11.5
13C12-HxCOF 478 11.2
13C12-HXCDD 478 10.2
13C12-HpCDF 789 12.9
112
115
112
102
129
1.51
0.49
1.12
0.41
31:18
36:12
40:20
41:28
47:08
ALTERNATE STANDARDS RECOVERY SUMMARY (TYPE A )
NAME AMT (ng ) % REC. RATIO RT FLAGS
13012-HxCDF 789 7.5 75.0 0.46 42:25
13012-HxCDF 234 8.2 82.0 0.48 41:16
INTERNAL STANDARDS RECOVERY SUMMARY
NAME AMT (ng ) % REC. RATIO RT FLAGS
13C12-2378-TCDF
7.3
72.5
0.76
30:28
13C12-2378-TCDD
8.3
82.8
0.79
31:16
13C12-PGCDF 123
8.0
80.2
1.54
35:14
13C12-PeCDD 123
10.9
109
1.57
36:41
13C12-HxCDF 678
7.5
74.5
0.51
40:29
13C12-HXCDD 678
8.6
86.3
1.20
41:36
13C12-HpCDF 678
8. 1
81 .3
0.42
44:55
13C12-HpCDD 678
10.3
103
1.03
46:28
13C12-OCDD
15.8
79.2
0.88
51:52
2_/lL/te\ M237_RPT rev: 3.03
D-75
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
CONFIRMATION ANALYSIS (DB-225)
Page i of 1
0 7/11/90
FILE NAMf$. .
CONCAL
ANALYST
SAMPLE SIZE
ICAL DATE..
SPIKE FILE.
NAME
W105705
W901056
DM
1.00
05/15/90
SPC2NF10
CLIENT ID : ENTROPY
SAMPLE ID : 7C-OUT MM5
ANALYSIS OATE: 07/06/90
SAMPLE MATRIX: MM5
SAMPLE ORIGIN: n/a
TLI NUMBER : 33-30-3A-D
PROJECT NUMBER
DATE RECEIVED.
DATE COLLECTED
SHIPMENT NO...
15962
06/14/90
/ /
n/a
AMT(ng ) NUMBER
DL
0.0"
EMPC
RATIO
RT
FLAGS
2378-TCOD
2378-TCDF
TOTAL TCDD
TOTAL TCDF
ND
0.55
0.16
2.5
2.8
0.69 18:43
0.78
0.71
SURROGATE STD. RECOVERY SUMMARY (TYPE A)
NAME ' AMT (ng ) % REC.
37C1-TCDD 10.2 102
RATIO
RT FLAGS
17:24
INTERNAL STANDARDS RECOVERY SUMMARY
NAME AMT (ng ) % REC.
RATIO
FLAGS
13C12-2378-TCDF
13C12-2378-TCDD
7.4
7.4
73.7
74.1
0.75
0.78
18:42
17:24
2z/JL/l*
C2NF RPT rev:3.01
D-76
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
PCDD/PCDF ANALYSIS (2378A)
Page 1 of 2
07/11/90
FILE NAME.
CONCAL..
ANALYST...
SAMPLE SIZE
ICAL DATE..
SPIKE FILE
S208503
S902083
JA
1.00
06/27/90
SPM2371C
CLIENT ID : ENTROPY
TLI NUMBER : 33-30-4A-0
SAMPLE 10 :
ANALYSIS DATE:
SAMPLE MATRIX:
SAMPLE ORIGIN:
7C-MID MM5
06/30/90
MM5
n/a
PROJECT NUMBER
DATE RECEIVED.
DATE COLLECTED
SHIPMENT NC...
15962
06/14/90
/ /
n/a
NAME
AMT(ng ) :
NUMBER
DL
EMPC
RATIO
RT
FLAGS
2378-TCDD
EMPC
0.45
12378-PeCDD
ND
0.03
123478-HxCDD
ND
0.05
123678-HxCDO
ND
0.04
123789-HxCDD
ND
0.06
IT
1234678-HpCDD
EMPC
0.26
OCDD
2.9
0.85
51:53
2378-TCDF
3.5
0.72
30:29
12378-PeCDF
0.20
1.34
35:15
23478-PeCDF
0.86
1.57
36:13
123478-HxCDF
EMPC
0.23
123678-HxCDF
0.07
1.16
40:29
234678-HxCDF
0.11
1.10
41: 18
123789-HxCDF
ND
0.06
1234678-HpCDF
0.12
0.90
44: 55
1234789-HpCDF
ND
0.06
OCDF
EMPC
0.21
TOTAL MCDD
0.30
1
0.31
3.26
TOTAL DCDD
64.5
2
64.7
1.47
TOTAL TriCDD
1.9
3
1.06
TOTAL TCDD
0.28
2
0.78
0.80
TOTAL PeCDD
EMPC
0.03
TOTAL HxCDD
0.07
1
0.14
1.22
TOTAL HpCDD
EMPC
0.52
TOTAL MCDF
11.1
2
11.8
3.42
TOTAL DCDF
25.6
4
27.2
6.57
TOTAL Tri CDF
8,6
8
9.8
1.09
TOTAL TCDF
10.3
11
10.7
0.74
TOTAL PeCDF
4.7
8
4.9
1.53
TOTAL HxCDF
0.52
3
0.86
1.11
TOTAL HpCDF
0.16
1
0.90
: a?
nn
M237_RPT
rev:3.03
D-77
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
PCDD/PCDF ANALYSIS (2378A) QA/QC SUMMARY
Page 2 of 2
07/11/90
FILE NAME...
CONCAL
ANALYST..,..
SAMPLE SIZE.
ICAL DATE...
SPIKE FILE..
S20S503
S902083
JA
1.00
06/27/90
SPM23710
CLIENT ID : ENTROPY
SAMPLE ID : 7C-MID MM5
TLI NUMBER
ANALYSIS DATE:
SAMPLE MATRIX:
SAMPLE ORIGIN:
06/30/90
MM5
n/a
PROJECT NUMBER
DATE RECEIVED.
DATE COLLECTED
SHIPMENT NO...
33-30-4A-D
15962
06/14/9C
/ /
n/a
SURROGATE RECOVERY SUMMARY (TYPE A )
NAME AMT (ng ) % REC.
RATIO
RT
FLAGS
37C1-TC0D
13C12-PeCDF
13C12-HXCDF
13C12-HXC0D
13012-HpCDF
234
478
478
789
11.8
11.2
11.2
10.4
11.3
118
112
112
104
113
1.51
0.49
1.18
0.39
31:18
36:12
40:19
41:28
47:08
ALTERNATE STANDARDS RECOVERY SUMMARY (TYPE A )
NAME AMT (ng ) % REC. RATIO RT FLAGS
13C12-HXCDF 789 8.0 79.7 0.46 42:25
13C12-HXCDF 234 9.3 93.3 0.48 41:16
INTERNAL STANDARDS RECOVERY SUMMARY
NAME
AMT (ng )
% REC.
RATIO
RT
FLAGS
13C12-2378-TCDF
8.4
83.8
0.75
30:28
13C12-2378-TCDD
9.0
90.0
0.81
31:16
13C12-PeCDF 123
8.1
80.7
1.55
35:14
13C12-PeCDD 123
10.4
104
1.52
36:41
13C12-HXCDF 678
8.4
83.5
0.49
40:29
13C12-HXCDD 678
9.2
91.6
1.17
41:36
13C12-HpCDF 678
8.7
86.8
0.41
44:55
13C12-HpCDD 678
10.0
100
o
o
46:27
13C12-OCDD
13.9
69.7
0.93
51:52
—
"42-
2j!u%A
M237 RPT rev:3.03
D-78
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC. Page 1 of 1
CONFIRMATION ANALYSIS
(DB-225)
07/11/90
FILE NAME....
wm*7fifi CI TFNT Tn • FNTROPY
TLI NUMBER :
33-30-4A
CONCAl.
wamofifi SAMPl.F 10 : 7C-
Min MM5
ANALYST
SAMPLE SIZE..
ICAL DATE....
OM ANALYSIS DATE: 07/06/90
1.00 SAMPLE MATRIX: MM5
0£/1ft/Q0 SAMPLF ORIGIN: n/a
PROJECT NUMBER:
DATE RECEIVED.:
DATE COLLECTED:
15962
06/14/90
/ /
n/a
SPIKE FILE...
SPC2NF10
SHIPMENT NO...:
NAME
AMT(ng ) NUMBER DL
EMPC
RATIO RT
FLAGS
2378-TCDD
2378-TCDF
0.47
2.2
0.76 17:25
0.75 18:44
TOTAL TCDD
0,79 2
0.85
G.78
TOTAL TCDF
8.5 16
8.6
0.73
SURROGATE STD
. RECOVERY SUMMARY (TYPE A)
NAME
AMT (ng ) % REC.
RATIO
RT
FLAGS
37C1-TCDD
10.0 99.7
17:25
INTERNAL SIANDARUS RECOVERY SUMMARY
NAME
AMT (ng ) % REC.
RATIO
RT
FLAGS
13C12-2378-TCDF 7.9 78.9
13C12-2378-TCDD 8.2 82.2
0.80
0.78
18:43
17:23
:
C2NF_RPT
rev:3.01
D-79
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
Initial Calibration Summary for SM00626
Date: 07/02/90
Analysis Date....: 06/27/00
Name
RF
SD
Total MCDF
2.505
0. 175
Total .MCDD
2 220
0. 173
Total DCDF
0 oo
V •
0.014
Total DCDD ?
1.522
0.238
Total TriCDF
0.766
0.029
Total TriCDD
0.801
0.085
237S-TCDF
0.874
0.066
TOTAL TCDF
0.874
0.066
2378-TCDD
0.054
0.075
TOTAL TCDD
0.054
0. 075
12378-PcCDF
1 .303
0.098
23478-PcCDF
1.210
0. 083
TOTAL PcCDF
1.257
0.089
12378-PrCDD
1.799
0.266
TOTAL PcCDD
1 . 799
0.266
123478-HxCDF
1.066
0.061
123678-HxCDF
1.290
0.094
234678-HxCDF
0.840
0.091
123789-KxCDF
0.609
0.055
TOTAL HxCDF
0.951
0.070
123478-HxCDD
0.870
0.062
123678-HxCDD
1.073
0.133
123789-HxCDD
0.820
0.047
TOTAL HxCDD
0.923
0.078
1234678-HpCDF
1.925
0.135
123478'J-HpCDF
1.072
0.041
TOTAL HpCDF
1 .498
0.085
1234678-HpCDD
1.051
0.088
TOTAL HpCDD
1 .051
0.088
OCDF
1.053
0.243
OCDD
1.028
0.235
Name
or
SD
37C1-TCDD
0.887
0.084
13Cl2-PcCDF 234
1.094
0.084
13C12-HxCDF 473
0.698
0.030
13C12-HxCDF 234
0.731
0.070
13C12-HXCDF 780
0.540
0.044
13C12-HxCDD 478
0.636
0.018
13C12-KpCDF 789
0. 741
0.024
Xante
RF
SD
13C!2-2379-TCDF
1.608
0.204
13C12 - 2378-TCDD
1 . 090
0.041
13C12-?cCDF 123
0 . 875
0. 105
13C12-PcCDD 123
0.454
0. 089
13C12-KxCDF 672
1 C23
0. 168
13C12-HxCDD 678
1 .168
0.118
13C12-KpCDF 673
0 ° n 5
C.OGS
13C12-HpCDD 678
0.708
0.C57
13C12-0CDD
0. 628
0.158
Method....: M237
Machine...: S
%RSD
RT
RT/L0
RT/HI
Ratiol
Ratio2
Peal;
1%
11 : 45
8: 10
19: 10
0 001
0
o<»-
Vw
12:53
O . SO
W • V V
19:58
2.835
0
OP
V 'V
16:55
15:10
20: 10
5 . 827
'/
ie%
17:55
15:58
20:58
1.611
0
4%
22' 21
19:10
24:10
1.025
0
sJ
11%
oo . oo
..i. . 4.1'
20:58
24:58
1.015
0
Of'
28:11
24:10
32:10
0. 732
5
OA-
0. 732
5
o«-
vw
28:59
24:58
32:58
0.790
R
8%
0.790
5
oe
32:54
28:53
36:53
1 .582
5
n?
33 •
1 .601
0
1%
1 . 591
5
15**
34:21
30 20
00 on
1 .544
5
155;
1 .544
5
G%
37:57
34:05
42:05
1 .100
r
38:06
1 .079
5
Hit
38:54
1 .096
5
9*
40:02
1 .098
3
1%
1 .091
5
1%
39:07
35:14
43:14
1 010
~ • to 1
5
1
X *
39:15
1.143
2
0%
39:42
I . 180
5
0%
1.175
5
7%
42:31
38:30
46:30
0.902
5
4%
44:38
0.913
5
6%
0.906
5
Oft.
vw
44 :02
40:01
48:01
1 .037
5
8~
1.037
5
22*c
48:58
44 :46
52:46
0.916
5
OOA-
48:48
44 :46
52:46
0.853
5
%RSD
RT
RT/LO
RT/HI
Ratiol
Ratio2
Peak
10%
28:59
26:58
30:58
2
Oft'
w
33:51
30:53
34 :53
1.519
5
4%
37:56
0.509
5
lit
00 . eo
VV • J
0.496
0
O*'
vv
40:01
0.509
5
O*
wv
39:06
1.190
5
44:37
40:30
46:30
0.432
5
!£RSD
RT
RT/LO
RT/HI
Ratiol
Rat:c2
Peak
12%
28:10
27:10
29: 10
0.761
5
A O'
•l 'g
00 . so
mW . Ou
26:58
30:58
0.807
5
^ Of'
32:53
28 53
36 53
1 .546
5
20%
34:20
30:20
38 20
1 . 529
5
10%
38:05
34:05
a *¦> r> z.
n w « w
0.504
10%
39:14
35 14
43*14
1 218
fl»-
a 0 . r> a
1 W • W
40:30
46:30
0.428
1 A . A 1
1 AAT
. v a
*is/ .
I . v V i
o:o
48 :46
46:46
50:46
r\ or .1
V . v ' T
D-80
-------
CASE NARRATIVE
Triangle Laboratories, Inc
801-10 Capitola Dr.
Research Triangle Park, NC 27713
(919) 54.4-5729
DATE: July 14, 1990
CLIENT NO: 3808 T-7
TLI NO: 15958
OBJECTIVE: Analysis of MM5 train samples for
semivolatile compounds.
METHOD
The samples were spiked with 50 ug of nitrobenzene-d5,
2-fluorobiphenyl and terphenyl-d14 and 100 ug of 2-f1uorophenol,
2,4,6-tribromophenol and phenol-dg prior to extraction. The
samples were Soxhlett extracted for 16 hours with toluene. All
extracts were combined and concentrated to one milliliter prior
to analysis. The semivolatile analysis Method was 8270 from EPA
SW-846.
The internal standards, 1 ,4-dichlorobenzene-d^ , naphtha-
lene-dg, acenaphthene-d 1 0 , phenanth'rene-d 1 0, chrysene-d-| 2 and
perylene-d^ were added in the amount of 40 ug immediately prior
to analysis by GC/MS.
The GC/MS analysis conditions are listed below:
GC CONDITIONS:
Column:
Program:
J&W DB-5, 30m x .32mm x 25micron
film th i ckness
40C hold 3 min to 300C at 8C/min
hoid 4.5 min
MS CONDITIONS:
Instrument: TRIO-1, Lab Base data system
Scan: 35-510 amu at 1s/scan
Ion Source: 180C
Interface: Capillary 275C
REPORT
Included with the case narrative are the chain of custody
sheets, instrument log pages and tracking forms and wet laborato-
ry information.
The data are reported as quantitation reports, chromato-.
grams, interim reports, and spectra of detected compounds. The
quantitation report header describes the sample and calibration
injection ID, 'data file' and *RF file' respectively. The sample
D-81
-------
CASE NARRATIVE
Triangle Laboratories, Inc
801-10 Capitola Dr.
Research Triangle Park, NC 27713
(919) 544-5729
name, dilution factor, TLI project number, date of report, and
analysis date are also listed in the quantitation report header.
The raw areas and scan numbers found on the quantitation report
are from the interim report. The RF is from the continuing
calibration. All initial and continuing calibration data is
located in the back of the data package. The ISID is the inter-
nal standard identifier. Those compounds matched to naphthale-
ne-dg, for example, are flagged with ISID number 14. The
amounts for the target compounds are reported in ug. The sample
calculations are listed below in the Sample Calculations section
of the narrative. If the target compound is detected, a code of
'D' is reported. If the target compound is detected but the
amount is below the quantitation limit, a code of 'E' or estimat-
ed is reported. If the target compound is not detected, a code
of ' ND* is reported. Amounts reported for target compounds that
are not detected are calculated using an area of 20 counts.
Compounds flagged with the code 'IS* are internal standards.
RESULTS
The sample AUDIT #2176 was not analyzed for Method 8270
compounds, as per Rik Tebeau.
The MM5 extracts were run with a five and one-half minute
solvent delay in order to avoid damage to the filament caused by
the large solvent front of the samples. No data was therefore
collected for the early eluting surrogate 2-f1uorophenol. This
surrogate is reported with a recovery of 0.0 percent.
As authorized by Entropy, all samples were run at diluted
levels in order to have all analytes within the calibration range
of the analysis. The samples 1-7A-OUT-MM5 and 2-7A-MID-MM5 were
diluted 1:10 while samples 3-7C-OUT-MM5 and 4-7C-MID-MM5 were
diluted 1:100. For all samples, the dilutions caused the surro-
gates to be lost so no recoveries are reported.
The surrogate recoveries in the laboratory blank SBLK 061490
were very good for MM5 train samples. The surrogate recoveries
for 2-fluorobiphenyl , nitrobenzene-d5, and terpheny1-d14 were
good in all samples. The recovery of phenol-dg was good in
sample 1-7A-OUT-MM5, but the recovery of 2,4,6-tribromophenol was
very low. The recoveries of phenol-dc and 2,4,6-tribromophenol
were normal in sample 2-7A-MID-MM5. The recoveries of these two
acidic surrogates were very high (approximately 180% for phenol-
d5 and 470% for 2,4,6-tribromophenol) in samples.3-7C-OUT-MM5 and
4-7C-MI0-MM5. Because the recoveries for these surrogates look
normal in the laboratory blank and in most of the other samples
D-82
-------
CASE NARRATIVE
Triangle Laboratories, Inc
801-10 Capitola Dr.
Research Triangle Park, NC 27713
(919) 54-4—57 29
this is most likely due to a matrix effect.
There was no chrysene-d12 found in the 1:100 dilution of
sample 3-7C-OUT-MM5. There were no target compounds matched to
this internal standard found in the sample either. The quantita-
tion report amounts for these compounds are flagged with the
error message ERR. There was no perylene-d-^ found in sample 4-
7C-MID-MM5. There were no target compounds matched to this
internal standard either. The quantitation report amounts for
these compounds are also flagged with the error message ERR.
The following compounds were found as contaminants in the
laboratory blank, SBLK 061490: benzyl alcohol, di-n-butylphtha-
late, and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate. These contaminants should
not be considered present in the associated samples unless they
are found in the sample at a level five times higher than the
level in the blank.
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
Response Factor, RF:
RF = (Area X * Amount Int Std)
(Area Int Std * Amount X)
Amount in samples, ug:
Amount, ug = (Area X * Amt Int Std)
(Area Int Std * RF X)
where:
X = Analyte
Int Std = internal standard
Amt Int Std = amount of internal standard = 40 ug
RF X = response factor of X from the continuing calibration
Valerie Evans Penny^Brock Nancy Bragg
Laboratory Manager QA/QC Officer Report Generation Manager
D-83
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
801-10 Cap-itola Orive DATA FILE:FB81006 SAMPLE ID 1-7A-OUT-MM5
Research Triangle Park, NC 27713 RF FILE: FB809 OILN FACTOR 2
Telephone: (919) 544-5729 DATE: 07/09/90
TLI Project Number: 15958
ANALYSIS DATE: 07/03/90
QUANTITATION REPORT
NAME AREA RF SCAN ISID AMOUNT, ug CODE QUAN LIMIT
1 1,4-Dichlorobe'nzene-d4
436
75
1
IS
2 Phenol
0
1.5257
0
1
2.41 NO
20
3 bia(2-Chloroethy1)ether
0
1.2341
0
1
2.98 NO
20
4 2-Chlorophenol
0
1.2461
0
1
2.94 NO
20
5 1,3-Oichlorobenzene
0
1.4692
0
1
2.50 NO
20
6 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
742
1.5313
77
1
89.01 D
20
7 Benzyl alcohol
4490
.4837
118
1
1703.23 D
20
8 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
568
1.4079
98
1
74.16 D
20
9 2-Methylphenol
0
1.1661
0
1
3.15 ND
20
10 bis(2-Chloro1sopropyl)ether
0
2.3815
0
1
1.54 ND
20
11 4-MetMylphenol
0
1.0276
0
1
3.58 ND
20
12 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamina
0
1.0912
0
1
3.37 ND
20
13 Hexachloroethane
0
.3238
0
1
11.35 ND
20
14 Naphthalene-d8
2698
287
14
IS
15 Nitrobenzene
0
.5786
0
14
1.03 NO
20
16 Isophorone
0
.9021
0
14
.66 ND
20
17 2-Nitrophenol
1240
.1513
226
14
242.95 0
20
18 2,4-Dinethylphenol
0
.3610
0
14
1 .64 NO
20
19 Benzoic acid
23611
.1552
377
14
4512.73 D
20
20 bis(2-Ch1oroethoxy)methane
0
.3741
0
14
1.59 ND
20
21 2,4-Oichlorophenol
0
.3538
0
14
1.68 ND
20
22 1,2 ,4-Trichlorobenzene
14130
.5944
282
14
704.98 D
20
23 Naphthalene
67901
1.1453
292
14
1758.23 D
20
24 4-Chloroan<1ine
0
.2409
0
14
2.46 ND
20
25 Hexachlorobutadiene
0
.2446
0
14
2.42 NO
20
2 5 4-Chloro-3-nethy1phenol
0
.3056
0
14
1.94 NO
20
27 2-Methylnaphthalene
3254
.7696
414
14
125.40 D
20
28 Acenaphthene-d10
1020
597
28
IS
29 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
0
.1472
0
28
10.66 NO
20
30 2,4,6-Trichloropheool
0
.4649
0
28
3.23 ND
20
31 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
0
.6083
0
28
2.58 NO
20
32 2-Chloronaphthalene
0
1.1721
0
28
1.34 NO
20
33 2-Nitroaniline
0
.5275
0
28
2.97 ND
20
34 Dioethylphthalate
0
1.3735
0
28
1.14 ND
20
35 Acenaphthylene
0
1.5087
0
2B
1.04 ND
20
36 3-Nitroannine
0
.1648
0
28
9.52 ND
20
37 Acenaphthene
0
1.1378
0
28
1.38 ND
20
38 2,4-Dinitrophenol
0
.0801
0
28
19.58 NO
20
39 4-Nitrophenol
0
.0855
0
28
18.34 NO
20
40 Dibonzofuran
3059
1.8332
636
28
130.87 0
20
41 2,4-Oirntrotoluene
0
.3271
0
28
4.80 NO
20
42 2,6-Dinitrotoluene
0
.2797
0
28
5.61 ND
20
43 Diethylphthalate
0
1.0448
0
28
1.50 NO
20
D-84
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
801-10 Capitola Drive
Research Triangle Park, NC 27713
Telephone: (919) 544-5729
QUANTITATION
R E
DATA FILE:FB81005 SAMPLE ID S8LK 061490
RF FILE: FB809 DILN FACTOR 2
OATE: 07/09/90
TLX Project Number: 15968
ANALYSIS DATE: 07/03/90
PORT
NAME
AREA
RF SCAN
ISID
AMOUNT, ug CODE
QUAN LIMIT
1 1, 4-Dichlorobenzene-d4
420
73
1
IS
2 Phenol
0
1.5257
0
1
2.49 NO
20
3 bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
0
1.2341
0
1
3.08 ND
20
4 2-Chlorophenol
0
1.2481
0
1
3.05 NO
20
5 1,3-0ichlorobenzene
0
1.4692
0
1
2.59 NO
20
6 1 ,4-0ichlorobenzene
0
1.5313
0
1
2.49 ND
20
7 Benzyl alcohol
118
.4837
107
1
46.39 D
20
8 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
0
1 .4079
0
1
2.70 ND
20
9 2-Methylphenol
0
1.1661
0
1
3.26 NO
20
10 bis(2-Chloroisopropy1)ether
0
2.3815
0
1
1.60 ND
20
11 4-Methylphenol
0
1.0276
0
1
3.70 ND
20
12 N-N1troso-di-n-propylamine
0
1.0912
0
1
3.49 ND
20
13 Hexachloroethane
0
.3238
0
1
11.75 ND
20
14 Naphtha1ene-d8
1293
281
14
IS
15 Nitrobenzene
0
.5786
0
14
2. 14 ND
20
16 Isophorone
0
.9021
0
14
1.37 NO
20
17 2-Nitrophenol
0
.1513
0
14
8.17 NO
20
18 2,4-Dimethylphenol
0
.3610
0
14
3.43 ND
20
19 Benzoic acid
0
.1552
0
14
7.97 ND
20
20 bi8(2-Ch1oroethoxy)metharte
0
.3741
0
14
3.31 ND
20
21 2,4-Oichlorophenol
0
.3538
0
14
3.50 ND
20
22 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
0
.5944
0
14
2.08 ND
20
23 Naphthalene
0
1.1453
0
14
1.08 NO
20
24 4-Ch1©roani1ine
0
.2409
0
14
5.13 ND
20
25 Hexacniorobutadiene
0
.2446
0
14
5.06 ND
20
26 4-Ch1oro-3-«ethylphenol
a
.3056
0
14
4.05 ND
20
27 2-Methylnaphthalene
0
.7696
0
14
1.61 ND
20
28 Acenaphthene-d10
856
593
28
IS
29 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
0
.1472
0
28
12.69 ND
20
30 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
0
. 4849
0
28
3.85 ND
20
31 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
0
.6083
0
28
3.07 NO
20
32 2-Chloronaphthalene
0
1.1721
0
28
1.59 ND
20
33 2-Nitroaniline
0
.5275
0
28
3.54 NO
20
34 Oimethylphthalate
0
1.3735
0
28
1.36 NO
20
35 Acenaphthylene
0
1.5087
0
28
1.24 ND
20
36 3-N\troan i1i ne
0
.1648
0
28
11.34 ND
20
37 Acenaphthene
0
1 -1378
0
28
1.64 ND
20
38 2 ,4-Dinitrophenol
0
.0801
0
28
23.32 ND
20
39 4-Nitrophenol
0
.0855
0
28
21.85 ND
20
40 Dibenzofuran
0
1 .8332
0
28
1.02 ND
20
41 2 ,4-Oinitrotoluono
0
.3271
0
28
5.71 ND
20
42 2 ,6-Oinitrotoluene
0
.2797
0
28
6.68 ND
20
43 DiethyIphthalate
154
1.0448
702
28
13.75 E
20
D-85
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
801-10 Capitola Drive DATA FILE:FB81005 SAMPLE 10 SBLK 061490
Research Triangle Park, NC 27713 RF FILE: FB809 DILN FACTOR 2
Teleohone: (919) 544-5729 OATE: 07/09/90
TLI Project Number: 15968
ANALYSIS OATE: 07/03/90
QUANTITATION REPORT
NAME AREA RF SCAN ISIO AMOUNT, ug COOE QUAN LIMIT
44
4-Chloropheny"l-pheny Tether
0
1.0162
0
28
1.84
NO
20
45
Fluorene
0
1.4392
0
26
1.30
ND
20
46
4-Nitroani1ine
0
.1498
0
28
12.47
NO
20
47
Phenanthrene-d10
1769
859
47
IS
48
4,6-D1nitro-2-aethylphenol
0
.0354
0
47
25.53
ND
20
49
N-Nitrosod1phenylamine(1)
0
.3807
0
47
2.38
NO
20
50
4-Brocnophenyl-phenylether
0
.1553
0
47
5.82
NO
20
51
Hexachlorobenzene
0
. 1394
0
47
6.49
NO
20
52
Pentachlorophenol
0
.0303
0
47
29.33
NO
20
53
Phenanthrene
0
1.1598
0
47
. 78
NO
20
54
Anthracene
0
1.1101
0
47
.81
ND
20
55
Ol-n-butylphthalate
392
.6613
1005
47
26.62
D
20
56
Fluoranthene
0
1.7081
0
47
.53
NO
20
57
Chry»ene-d12
2770
1313
57
IS
58
Pyrene
0
1.7571
0
57
.33
ND
20
59
Butylbenzylphthalate
0
.4937
0
57
1.17
ND
20
60
3.3'-Dichlorobenzidine
0
.1068
0
57
5.41
ND
20
61
Benzo(a)anthracene
0
1 .3685
0
57
. 42
NO
20
62
Chrysene
0
1.3009
0
57
.44
ND
20
63
bia(2-Ethylhexy1Jphthalate
297
.7254
1357
57
11.81
E
20
64
Pery1ene-d12
2215
1513
64
IS
65
0\-n-octylphtha1ate
0
3.1428
0
64
.23
NO
20
66
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
0
2.2061
0
64
.33
NO
20
67
Benzo(k)f1uoranthene
0
2.5592
0
64
.28
NO
20
68
Benzo(a)pyrene
0
1.7546
0
64
.41
ND
20
69
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
0
.8215
0
64
.68
NO
20
70
01benz(a,h)anthracer>e
0
1.0083
0
64
. 72
ND
20
71
Benzo(g,h,i)pery1ene
0
1.1378
0
64
.63
NO
20
SURROGATE SUMMARY AREA RF SCAN ISID AMOUNT CODE X RECOVERY
72
N1trobenzer>e-dS
159
.3562
164
14
27.55
0
55.1
73
2-F1uorobi phenyl
310
.7861
485
28
36.86
0
73.7
74
Terpheny1-d14
574
.6017
1160
57
27. 58
0
55.2
75
Pheno1-d5
347
.7144
39
1
92. 43
0
92.4
76
2-F1uorophenol
0
.7165
0
1
.00
ND
.0
77
2,4 ,6-TMbromophenol
44
.0414
739
28
99.89
D
99.9
D-86
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
801-10 Capitol* Drive DATA FILE:FB81006 SAMPLE ID 1-7A-OUT-MM5
Reaearch Triangle Park, HC 27713 RF PILE: FB809 DILH FACTOR 2
Telephone: (919) 544-5729 DATE: 07/09/90
TLI Project Number: 15968
ANALYSIS DATE: 07/03/90
QUANTITATION REPORT
NAME
AREA
RF SCAN
ISID AMOUNT, US CODE QUAN LIMIT
44 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
0
1.0162
0
28
1.54 ND
20
45 Fluorene
0
1.4382
0
28
1.09 NO
20
46 4-NitroanlHne
0
. 1498
0
28
10.47 ND
20
47 Phenanthrer>e-d10
2137
862
47
IS
48 4,8-Dlnitro-2-Bethylpher>ol
0
. 0354
0
47
21.14 NO
20
49 N-Nltrcsodlphenylamine(1)
0
.3807
0
47
1.97 ND
20
50 4-Bronophenyl-phenylether
0
.1553
0
47
4.82 ND
20
51 HexacMorobenzene
0
. 1394
0
47
5.37 ND
20
52 Pentachlorophenol
0
.0303
0
47
24.69 ND
20
53 Phenanthrene
4025
1.1598
666
47
129.94 0
20
54 Anthracene
0
1.1101
0
47
.67 ND
20
55 Dl-n-butylphthalate
0
.8613
0
47
1.13 NO
20
SB Fluoranthene
852
1.7001
1079
47
14.29 E
20
57 Chry»ene-d12
3954
1316
57
IS
5B Pyrene
0
1.7571
0
57
.23 NO
20
59 Butylbenzylphthalate
0
.4937
0
57
.82 NO
20
60 3,3*-0ich1orobenz4dine
0
. 1068
0
57
3.79 NO
20
01 Benzo(a)anthracene
0
1.3685
0
57
.30 NO
20
62 Chrysane
0
1.3009
0
57
.31 NO
20
63 b1s(2«Ethy1hexyl)phtha1ate
3025
.7254
1359
57
84.37 D
20
64 Pery1ene-d12
1249
1515
64
IS
65 01-n-octylpftthalate
241
3.1428
1452
64
4.91 E
20
66 Benzo(b)f luorartthene
0
2.2061
0
64
.58 NO
20
67 Benzo(k)fluoranthene
0
2.5592
0
64
.50 NO
20
68 Benzoe
0
.8215
0
64
1.56 ND
20
70 D4benz(ath)anthracene
0
1.0083
0
64
1.27 ND
20
71 Benzo(9(h,1)perylene
0
1.1378
0
64
1.13 NO
20
SURROGATE SUMMARY
AREA
RF
SCAN
ISID
AMOUNT CODE
* RECOVERY
72 N1trobenzene~d5
770
.3562
168
14
64.07 D
128. 1
73 2-Fluorobiphenyl
529
.7861
489
28
52.76 D
105.5
74 Terpheny1-d14
1093
.6017
1162
57
36.76 D
73.5
75 Pheno1-d5
315
.7144
42
1
80.90 D
80.9
76 2-Fluorophenol
0
.7165
0
1
.00 ND
.0
77 2,4,6-TrSbromophenol
2
.0414
742
28
3.58 0
3.6
D-87
-------
INC.
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES
801-10 Cap*to1a Drive
Research Triangle Park, NC
Telephone: (919} 544-5729
QUANTITATION
DATA FILE:F8818 SAMPLE 10 1-7A-OUT-HM5 (1Mb OILN)
27713 RF FILE: FB81504 DILN FACTOR 20
DATE: 07/09/90
TLI Project Number: 15968
ANALYSIS DATE: 07/06/90
REPORT
NAME
AREA
RF SCAN
ISID
AMOUNT, ug CODE
GUAN LIMIT
1 1,4-D1ch1orobenzene-d4
381
60
1
IS
2 Phenol
0
1.1577
0
1
36.32 NO
200
3 bis(2-Ch1oroethy1 )ether
0
1.1357
0
1
37.02 NO
200
4 2-Chlorophenol
0
1.1506
0
1
36.55 ND
200
5 1,3-Oichlorobenzene
0
1.2920
0
1
32.55 NO
200
8 1 ,4-0ichlorobenzene
96
1.4004
63
1
143.53 E
200
7 Benzyl alcohol
567
.5147
97
1
2315.05 0
200
8 1,2-Dichlorobenxene
69
1.2366
84
1
116.51 E
200
9 2-Methy 1phor>o1
0
.8767
0
1
47.96 NO
200
10 bis(2-CMoro1oopropy1 )ether
0
1.2827
0
1
32.78 NO
200
11 4-Methylphenol
0
.7723
0
1
54.44 NO
200
12 N-N1 troBO-dl -n-propylafflirve
0
.8844
0
1
47.54 NO
200
13 Hexachloroethane
0
.5105
0
1
82.37 NO
200
14 Naphtha1ene-d8
1332
272
14
IS
15 Nitrobenzene
0
.4254
0
14
28.23 NO
200
1B Isophorone
0
.6024
0
14
19.94 NO
200
17 2-N1tropheno1
115
.1219
211
14
568.14 D
200
18 2,4-0iMthy1phenol
0
.2622
0
14
45.82 NO
200
19 Benzoic acid
1783
.1284
307
14
8242.96 0
200
20 bie(2-Ch1oroethoxy)Hiethane
0
.3515
0
14
34.18 NO
200
21 2,4-Oiehlorophenol
0
.210B
0
14
56.97 ND
200
22 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
974
.2895
266
14
2021.01 0
200
23 Naphthalene
4419
.9398
275
14
2824.16 0
200
24 4-Chloroani1ine
0
.3244
0
14
37.03 NO
200
25 Hexachlorobutadiene
0
. 1521
0
14
78.99 NO
200
28 4-Ch1oro-3-methy1pheno1
0
.1796
0
14
66.86 NO
200
27 2-Methylnaphthalene
334
.6264
400
14
319.91 0
200
28 Acenaphthene-d10
735
583
28
IS
29 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
0
.0854
0
28
254.76 NO
200
30 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
0
. 2453
0
28
88.68 NO
200
31 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
0
.3047
0
28
71.41 NO
200
32 2-CMoronaphtha1ene
0
.9935
0
28
21.90 NO
200
33 2-NttroaniHne
0
.3977
0
28
54.70 NO
200
34 Oiaethylphthalate
0
.9350
0
28
23.27 NO
200
35 Acertaphthylene
0
1.4186
0
28
15.34 NO
200
36 3-Nitroaniline
0
.1964
0
28
110.78 NO
200
37 Acenaphthene
(
0
.9146
0
28
23.79 NO
200
38 2,4-Dtnitrophenol
0
.1972
0
28
110.31 NO
200
39 4-Nttrophenol
0
.0821
0
28
264.99 NO
200
40 Dibenzofuran
318
1.3733
621
28
252.07 0
200
41 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
0
.2702
0
28
80.50 NO
200
42 2 ,6-Oinitrotoluene
0
.2125
0
28
102.40 NO
200
43 Oiethylphthalate
0
.8088
0
28
26.90 NO
200
D-88
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
801-10 Capitol* Drive
Research Triangle Park, NC 27713
Telephone: (919) 544-5729
DATA FILE:FB816 SAMPLE ID 1-7A-OUT-HH5 (1:10 OILN)
RP FILE: FB81504 DUN FACTOR 20
OATE: 07/09/90
TLI Project Number: 15968
ANALYSIS
OATE:
07/06/90
QUANTITATION
REPORT
m
ii
ii
ii
¦¦
ii
ii
n
ii
ii
ii
ii
ii
ii
ii
ii
ii
ii
ii
ii
ii
ii
e
0
.2353
0
28
92.46 NO
200
47 Phenanthrene-d10
620
847
47
13
48 4,B-01ne
0
.5917
0
57
53.74 ND
200
62 Cnrytene
0
1.3525
0
57
23.51 ND
200
63 bii(2-Ethy1hexy1)phtha1at«
0
.4956
0
57
64.16 ND
200
64 P«ry1erw-d12
151
1501
64
IS
65 01-n-octylphthalate
0
.9707
0
64
109.45 ND
200
66 Benzo(b)f1uoranther>e
0
.8181
0
64
129.87 ND
200
67 Benzo(k)fluoranthena
0
1.6757
0
84
63.40 NO
200
68 Benzo(a)pyrene
0
1.4188
0
64
74.88 ND
200
69 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
0
.5777
0
64
183.89 NO
200
70 Dibenz(A,h)anthracene
0
.6305
0
64
168.51 NO
200
71 Benzo(g,h,1)pery1eoe
0
1.0703
0
64
99.26 ND
200
SURROGATE SUMMARY
AREA
RF
SCAN
ISID
AMOUNT CODE
X RECOVERY
72 N1trobenzene-d5
0
.2240
0
14
.00 ND
.0
73 2-Fluorob
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
601-10 Capitola Drive
Reaearch Triangle Park, NC 27713
Telephone: (91?) 544-5729
QUANTITATION RE
DATA FILE:FB81007 SAMPLE ID 2-7A-HID-MM5
RF FILE: FB809 OILN FACTOR 2
OATE: 07/09/90
TLI Project Number: 15968
ANALYSIS OATE: 07/03/90
PORT
NAME
AREA
RF SCAN ISIO AMOUNT, us CODE QJAN LIMIT
1 1,4-0Schlorobe"nzono-d4
450
75
1
IS
2 Phenol
0
1.5257
0
1
2.33 NO
3 bis(2-Ch1oroethy1)ether
0
1.2341
0
1
2.88 NO
4 2-Ch1orophenol
0
1.2481
0
1
2.85 ND
5 1,3-Oichlorobenzene
0
1.4692
0
1
2.42 ND
0 1,4-Dichlorobonzene
0
1.0912
0
1
3.26 ND
13 Hexachloroethane
0
.3238
0
1
10.97 ND
14 Naphtha1ene-d8
2133
287
14
IS
15 Nitrobenzene
0
.5786
0
14
1.30 ND
16 Xsophororte
0
.9021
0
14
.83 NO
17 2-Nttrophenol
1191
.1513
226
14
295.12 0
18 2,4-Olaethylphenol
0
.3610
0
14
2.08 ND
19 Benzoic acid
16249
.1552
376
14
3926.96 0
20 bi*(2-Chloroetf>oxy)methane
0
.3741
0
14
2.00 ND
21 2,4-Dichlorophenol
0
.3538
0
14
2.12 ND
22 1,2,4-Tr1chlorobenzene
11673
.5944
281
14
736.42 0
23 Naphthalene
41304
1.1453
292
14
1352.40 D
24 4-Chloroani line
0
.2409
0
14
3.11 ND
25 Hexachlorobutadlene
0
.2446
0
14
3.07 ND
28 4-CMoro-3-«Bthy1phenol
0
.3056
0
14
2.45 NO
27 2-Hethylnaphthalene
1868
. 7696
414
14
91.03 0
28 Acenaphthene-d10
886
597
28
IS
29 Hexachlorocyclopentadierte
0
.1472
0
28
12.24 NO
30 2,4,6-TrlchlorophenOl
0
.4849
0
28
3.71 NO
31 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
0
.6083
0
28
2.96 ND
32 2-Chloronaphthalene
0
1.1721
0
28
1.54 NO
33 2-N1troan1line
0
.5275
0
28
3.41 NO
34 01«ethy1phtha1ate
0
1.3735
0
28
1.31 ND
35 Acenaphthylene
0
1.5087
0
28
1.19 ND
36 3-Nltroan1 Hn#
0
. 1648
0
28
10.93 NO
37 Acenaphthene
0
1.1378
0
28
1.58 ND
38 2,4-Dtnitrophenol
261
.0801
628
28
293.39 D
39 4-Nltrophenol
0
.0855
0
28
21.06 NO
40 Oibenzofuran
1821
1.8332
635
28
89.48 0
41 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
0
.3271
0
28
5.51 NO
42 2,6-0in*trotoluene
0
.2797
0
28
6.44 MO
43 OSethylphthalate
0
1.0448
0
26
1.72 NO
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
D-90
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
801-10 Capitola Drive DATA FILE:FB81007 SAMPLE ID 2-7A-MIO-MM5
Research Triangle Park, NC
27713
RF FILE:
FB809
OILN FACTOR
2
Telephone: (919) 544-5729
DATE
07/09/90
TLI i
Project Number:
15968
ANALYSIS
OATE:
07/03/90
QUANTITATION
R E P 0
R T
NAME
AREA
RF
SCAN
ISID
AMOUNT, ug
i COOE
QUAN LIMIT
44 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
0
1.0162
0
28
1.77
ND
20
45 Fluorene
0
1.4392
0
28
1.25
ND
20
46 4-Nitroani1ine
0
.1496
0
28
12.02
NO
20
47 Phenanthrene-dlO
2312
863
47
IS
48 4,6-0initro-2-methylphenol
0
.0354
0
47
19.53
ND
20
49 N-Nitrosodipheny1aAiir>e(1)
0
.3807
0
47
1.82
ND
20
50 4-Bro«
0
2.5592
0
64
1.12
ND
20
68 Benzo(a)pyrene
0
1.7546
0
64
1.63
ND
20
69 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrer>e
0
.8215
0
64
3. 47
ND
20
70 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
0
1.0083
0
64
2.83
ND
20
71 Benzo(g,h,1)pery1ene
0
1.1378
0
64
2. 51
ND
20
SURROGATE SUMMARY AREA RF SCAN ISID AMOUNT. COOE X RECOVERY
72
Nttrobenzene~d5
551
.3562
168
14
58.01
0
116.0
73
2-Fluorobiphenyl
470
.7861
489
28
53.82
0
107.6
74
Terphenyl-d14
966
.6017
1163
57
47.79
D
95.6
75
Phenol-d5
212
.7144
42
1
52.78
D
52.8
76
2-Fluorophenol
0
.7165
0
1
.00
NO
.0
77
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
24
.0414
742
28
53.17
D
53.2
D-91
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
801-10 Capitola Drive
Research Triangle Park, NC 27713
Telephone; (919} 544-5729
OATA FILE:FB81801 SAMPLE ID 2-7A-MID-MM5 (1:10 DILN)
RF FILE: FB81504 DILN FACTOR 20
DATE: 07/09/90
TLI Project Number: 15968
ANALYSIS DATE: 07/06/90
QUANTITATION
REPORT
NAME
AREA
RF SCAN
ISID
AMOUNT, ug CODE
1 1 ,4-01cMoro6enzene-d4
380
60
1
IS
2 Phenol
0
1.1577
0
1
36.39 NO
3 b1e(2-Ch1oroethyl)ether
0
1.1357
0
1
37.10 NO
4 2-Chlorophenol
0
1.1506
0
1
36.62 NO
5 1,3-Dichlorobenzene
0
1.2920
0
1
32.61 NO
6 1,4-Dichlorobenzerte
66
1.4004
63
1
99.35 E
7 Benzyl alcohol
549
.5147
97
1
2248.08 D
8 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
53
1.2386
84
1
89.68 E
9 2-Methylphenol
0
.8767
0
1
48.05 ND
10 bts(2-Ch1oroisopropy1)ether
0
1.2827
0
1
32.84 ND
11 4-Hethylphenol
0
.7723
0
1
54.55 ND
12 N-N1tro»o-d1-n-propyla«ine
0
.8844
0
1
47.64 NO
13 Hexachloroethane
0
.5105
0
1
82.54 ND
14 Naphtha1ene~d6
1210
271
14
IS
15 Nitrobenzene
O
.4254
0
14
31.07 NO
16 Isophorone
0
.6024
0
14
21.95 NO
17 2-Nitrophenol
105
.1219
211
14
567.88 0
18 2,4-Dinethylphenol
0
.2622
0
14
50.43 NO
19 Benzoic acid
1251
.1284
301
14
6440.53 0
20 b1e(2-Ch1oroethoxy)nethane
0
.3515
0
14
37.61 NO
21 2,4-Oichlorophenol
0
.2108
0
14
62.71 ND
22 112,4-Trichlorobenzene
673
.2895
266
14
1536.08 D
23 Naphthalene
2458
.9396
275
14
1729.05 D
24 4-Chloroani1ine
0
.3244
0
14
40.75 NO
25 Hexachlorobutadiene
0
.1521
0
14
86.94 NO
26 4-Ch1oro-3-aethy1pheno1
0
. 1796
0
14
73.59 ND
27 2-Methyl naphthalene
169
.6264
400
14
199.47 E
28 Acenaphthene-dlO
803
583
28
IS
29 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
0
.0854
0
26
233.23 ND
30 2,4,5-Trlchlorophenol
0
.2453
0
28
81.19 NO
31 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
0
.3047
0
28
65.37 NO
32 2-Chloronaphthalene
0
.9935
0
26
20.05 ND
33 2-Nitroaniline
0
.3977
0
28
50.08 ND
34 Dinethylphthalate
0
.9350
0
28
21.30 ND
35 Acenaphthylene
0
1.4186
0
26
14.04 ND
36 3-Nitroani1ine
0
.1964
0
28
101.42 ND
37 Acenaphthene
0
.9146
0
28
21.78 ND
38 2,4-Dinitrophenol
0
.1972
0
28
100.99 ND
39 4-Nitrophenol
0
.0821
0
28
242.60 ND
40 Dibenzofuran
195
1.3733
621
28
141.70 E
41 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
0
.2702
0
28
73.70 NO
42 2 ,6-Oinitrotoluene
0
.2125
0
28
93.74 NO
43 Diethylphthalato
0
.8088
0
28
24.63 NO
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
D-92
4
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
801-10 Capltola Orlve
Research Triangle Park, HC 27713
Telephone: (919) 544-5729
QUANTITATION
DATA FILE:FB81601 SAMPLE ID 2-7A-MID-MM5 (1:10 DILN)
RF FILE: FB81504 DILN FACTOR 20
DATE: 07/09/90
TLI Project Number: 15968
ANALYSIS DATE: 07/06/90
REPORT
NAME
AREA
RF
SCAN
ISID
AMOUNT, ug CODE
QUAN LIMIT
44
4-Chloropheny1-pheny1ether
0
. 4413
0
28
45.13 NO
200
45
Fluorene
0
1.0694
0
28
18.62 NO
200
48
4-N1troan1line
0
.2353
0
28
84.65 NO
200
47
Phenanthrene-d10
762
847
47
IS
48
4,6-Din1tro-2-methy1phenol
O
.0266
0
47
789.10 NO
200
49
N-Nttrosodlpheny1aiMne(1)
0
.5190
0
47
40.47 ND
200
50
4-Bromophenyl-phenyTether
0
. 1274
0
47
164.85 ND
200
51
Hexachlorobenzene
0
. 1401
0
47
149.99 NO
200
52
Pentach1orophenol
0
.0284
0
47
740.78 ND
200
53
Phenanthrene
108
1.0486
851
47
108.62 E
200
54
Anthracene
0
.7975
0
47
26.34 ND
200
55
Dl-n-butylphthalate
0
.7873
0
47
26.68 NO
200
36
Fluoranthene
0
.8510
0
47
24.69 ND
200
57
Chry&ene-d12
385
1302
57
IS
58
Pyrene
0
2.6306
0
57
15.79 NO
200
59
Butylbenzylphthalate
0
1.0210
0
57
40.68 ND
200
60
3,3'-OSchlorobenztdtne
0
.1905
0
57
218.03 ND
200
61
Benzo(a}anthracene
0
.5917
0
57
70.20 ND
200
62
Chrysene
0
1.3525
0
57
30.71 ND
200
63
bie(2-Ethy1hexy1)phtha1ate
0
.4956
0
57
83.81 NO
200
64
Perylen«-d12
151
1501
64
IS
65
D1-n-octy1phtha1ate
0
.9707
0
64
108.96 ND
200
68
Benzo(b)f1uoranthene
0
.8181
0
64
129.28 ND
200
67
Benzo(k)t1uoranthon©
0
1 .6757
0
64
63.12 NO
200
68
Benzo(a)pyrene
0
1 .4186
0
64
74.55 ND
200
69
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrona
0
.5777
0
64
1B3.06 NO
200
70
~\benz(a,h)anthracene
0
.6305
0
64
167.75 NO
200
71
8enzo(g,h,1)pery1ene
0
1.0703
0
64
98.82 NO
200
SURROGATE
SUMMARY
AREA
RF SCAN
ISID
AMOUNT
CODE X RECOVERY
72
N1trobenz«n»-d5
0
.2240
0
14
.00
ND
.0
73
2-Fluoroblphenyl
0
.5997
0
28
.00
ND
.0
74
Terpheny1-d14
0
.4672
0
57
.00
ND
.0
75
Phenol-d5
0
.8310
0
1
.00
ND
.0
76
2-Fluorophenol
0
.5721
0
1
.00
NO
.0
77
2,4 ,6-Tri brofnophenol
0
.0242
0
28
.00
NO
.0
D-93
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
801-10 Capitol* Drive
Research Triangle Park, NC 27713
Telephone: (919) 544-5729
OATA FILE:FB81008 SAMPLE ID 3-7C-OUT-MM5
RF FILE: FB809 DILN FACTOR 2
DATE: 07/09/90
TLI Project Number: 15966
ANALYSIS OATE: 07/03/90
QUANTITATION
REPORT
NAME AREA RF SCAN 2SID AMOUNT, ug COOE QUAN LIMIT
v
1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4
311
75
1
IS
2 Phenol
1357
1.5257
46
1
228.94 D
20
3 bi®(2-CMoroethy1)ether
0
1.2341
0
1
4.17 NO
20
4 2-Chlorophenol
0
1.2461
0
1
4.12 ND
20
5 1,3-Dichlorobenzerte
0
1.4692
0
1
3.50 NO
20
6 1,4-0ichlorobenzer>e
0
1.5313
0
1
3.36 ND
20
7 Benzyl alcohol
24504
.4837
125
1
13040.59 D
20
8 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
51
1.4079
98
1
9.37 E
20
9 2-Methylphenol
69
1.1661
143
1
15.20 E
20
10 bis(2-Ch!oro-isopropy1 )ether
0
2.3815
0
1
2.16 NO
20
11 4-Methylphenol
165
1.0276
172
1
41.24 0
20
12 N-Nitroeo-di-n-propylaaine
0
1.0912
0
1
4.72 ND
20
13 Hexachloroethane
0
.3238
0
1
15.90 ND
20
14 Naphthalene-48
992
286
14
19
15 Nitrobenzene
0
.5786
0
14
2.79 NO
20
16 Isophorone
0
.9021
0
14
1.79 ND
20
17 2-Nitrophenol
158
.1513
224
14
84.07 D
20
18 2,4-Dimethylphenol
0
.3610
0
14
4.47 ND
20
19 Benzoic acid
16737
.1552
385
14
8698.58 D
20
20 bts(2-CMoroethoxy)methane
0
.3741
0
14
4.31 ND
20
21 2,4-oichlorophenol
0
.3536
0
14
4.56 ND
20
22 1,2,4-Tr1chloro6enzene
0
.5944
0
14
2.71 ND
20
23 Naphthalene
0
1.1453
0
14
1.41 ND
20
24 4-Chloroani1ine
0
.2409
0
14
6.69 NO
20
25 Hexachlorobutadiene
0
.2446
0
14
6.59 ND
20
26 4-Chloro-3-«ethylphenol
0
.3056
0
14
5.28 ND
20
27 2-Methylnaphthalene
0
.7696
0
14
2.10 ND
20
28 Acenaphthene-d10
685
594
28
IS
29 HexacMorocyclopentadiene
0
.1472
0
28
15.86 ND
20
30 2,4, 6-Tr-ichlorophenol
0
.4849
0
28
4.82 NO
20
31 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
0
.6083
0
28
3.84 ND
20
32 2-Chloronaphthalene
0
1.1721
0
28
1.99 NO
20
33 2-Nitroan1line
0
.5275
0
28
4.43 NO
20
34 Dinethylpftthalate
0
1.3735
0
28
1.70 ND
20
35 Acenaphthylene
0
1.5087
0
28
1.55 ND
20
36 3-Nitroaniline
0
.1646
0
28
14.17 ND
20
37 Acenaphthene
0
1 .1378
0
28
2.05 NO
20
38 2,4-0initrophenol
0
.0801
0
28
29.15 ND
20
39 4-Nitrophenol
139
.0855
666
28
189.92 D
20
40 Dibenzofuran
140
1.8332
633
28
8.89 E
20
41 2,4-0initrotoluene
0
.3271
0
28
7.14 ND
20
42 2,6-Dinitrotoluene
0
.2797
0
28
8.35 ND
20
43 Oiethylphthalate
0
1.0448
0
28
2.23 ND
20
D-94
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
801-10 Capitol* Drive
Research Triangle Park, NC 27713
Telephone: (919) 544-5729
QUANTITATION
R E
DATA FILE:PB81008 SAMPLE ID 3-7C-0UT-MH5
RF FILE: FB809 DILN FACTOR 2
DATE: 07/09/90
TLI Project Number: 15988
ANALYSIS DATE: 07/03/90
PORT
NAME
AREA
RF
SCAN
ISID AMOUNT, ug CODE GUAM LIMIT
44
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
0
1.0162
0
28
2.30
ND
45
Fluorene
0
1.4392
0
28
1.62
NO
46
4-Nttroaniline
0
.1488
0
28
15.59
NO
47
Phenanthrene-d10
1978
860
47
3
48
4,6-Dlnitro-2-methy1phenol
0
.0354
0
47
22.83
ND
49
N-Nitrosod1phenylanine(1)
0
.3807
0
47
2. 12
NO
50
4-Bromopheny1-phenyTether
0
.1553
0
47
5.21
ND
51
Hexachlorobenzene
0
.1394
0
47
5.80
ND
52
Pentachlorophenol
0
.0303
0
47
26.67
ND
53
Phenanthrene
768
1.1598
863
47
26.77
0
54
Anthracene
0
1.1101
0
47
.73
ND
55
D\-n-buty1phtha1ate
167
.6613
1005
47
10.20
E
56
Fluoranthene
184
1.7081
1077
47
4.35
E
57
Chryeene-d12
3227
1314
57
]
58
Pyrene
0
1.7571
0
57
.28
ND
59
Bat y1benzy1phtha1ate
0
.4937
0
57
1.00
ND
60
3,3*-Dichlorobenzldlne
0
.1068
0
57
4.64
ND
61
Benzo(a)anthracene
0
1.3685
0
57
.36
NO
62
Chrysene
0
1.3009
0
57
.38
ND
63
b<«(2-Ethy1hexy1)phtha1ate
300
.7254
1357
57
10.26
E
64
Peryler>e-d12
1326
1514
64
:
65
Di-n-octylphthalate
0
3.1428
0
64
.38
ND
66
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
0
2.2061
0
64
.55
ND
67
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
0
2.5592
0
64
.47
ND
66
Benzo(a)pyrene
0
1.7546
0
64
.69
ND
69
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyreno
0
.8215
0
64
1.47
ND
70
04benz(a,h)anthracene
0
1.0083
0
64
1.20
ND
71
Benzo(g,h,1)pery1ene
0
1.1378
0
64
1.06
ND
ss:sassis:s:ss:iss:cs:ss:::3s::s:
S3BSS3SSS2XSSSSSS3S
ssassss:
rsssssss
ssszss:
SS3SSS3S
sss:
IS
IS
IS
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
SURROGATE SUMMARY AREA RF SCAN ISID AMOUNT COOE X RECOVERY
72
NHrobenzene-dS
220
.3562
167
14
49.77
D
99.5
73
2-Fluorob
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
801-10 Capitol* Drive
Research Triangle Park, NC 27713
Telephone: (919) 544-5729
QUANTITATION
OATA FILE:FB81602 SAMPLE ID 3-7C-OUT-MM5 (1:100 DILN)
RF FILE: FB81504 DILN FACTOR 200
DATE: 07/09/90
TLI Project Number: 15968
ANALYSIS DATE: 07/06/90
REPORT
NAME
AREA
RF
SCAN
ISIO AMOUNT, U9 CODE QUAN LIMIT
1 1,4-0ichloroben2ene-d4
403
60
1
IS
2 Phenol
0
1.1577
0
1
342.87 NO
3 bi«(2-Chloroethyl)ether
0
1.1357
0
1
349.51 NO
4 2-Chlorophenol
0
1.1506
0
1
345.01 ND
5 1,3-Dichlorobenzene
0
1.2920
0
1
307.24 ND
6 1,4-0ich1or©beniene
0
1.4004
0
1
283.45 ND
7 Benzyl alcohol
207
.5147
97
1
7987.23 D
8 1,2-D1chlorobenzene
0
1.2386
0
1
320.49 ND
9 2-Methylphenol
0
.8767
0
1
452.76 NO
10 bis(2-Ch1oroi8opropyl)ether
0
1.2827
0
1
309.46 ND
11 4-Methylphenol
0
.7723
0
1
513.98 ND
12 N-Nitroso-dl-n-propylareine
0
.8844
0
1
448.83 NO
13 HexacMoroethane
0
.5105
0
1
777.64 NO
14 Naphtl>a1ene-d8
1288
271
14
IS
15 Nitrobenzene
0
.4254
0
14
292.04 ND
16 Isophorone
0
.6024
0
14
206.25 ND
17 2-Nitropheno1
0
. 1219
0
14
1019.21 ND
18 2,4-0i*ethylphenol
0
.2622
0
14
473.92 ND
19 Benzoic acid
205
.1284
280
14
9928.19 D
20 Ms(2-Ch1oroethoxy)fliethane
0
.3515
0
14
353.51 ND
21 2,4-Dichlorophenol
0
.2108
0
14
589.34 ND
22 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
0
.2895
0
14
429.19 ND
23 Naphthalene
0
.9398
0
14
132.21 ND
24 4-Chloroani1ine
0
.3244
0
14
382.98 NO
25 Hexachlorobutadiene
0
.1521
0
14
817.05 NO
26 4-Chloro-3-«ethylphenol
0
.1796
0
1 4
691.63 ND
27 2-Methylnaphthalene
0
.8264
0
14
198.36 ND
28 Acenaphthene-dIO
718
583
28
IS
29 Hexacnlorocyclopentadiene
0
.0854
0
28
2610.57 NO
30 2|4,6-Trichlorophenol
0
.2453
0
28
908.75 ND
31 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
0
.3047
0
28
731.70 NO
32 2-Chloronaphthalene
0
.9935
0
28
224.38 ND
33 2-Nitroaniline
0
.3977
0
28
560.52 ND
34 Dinethylphthalate
0
.9350
0
28
238.43 ND
35 Acenaphthylene
0
1.4188
0
28
157.14 ND
36 3-Nitroaniline
0
.1964
0
28
1135.19 ND
37 Acenaphthene
0
.9146
0
28
243.75 ND
38 2,4-Dinitrophenol
0
.1972
0
28
1130.37 ND
39 4-Nitrophenol
0
.0821
0
28
2715.38 NO
40 Oibenzofuran
0
1.3733
0
28
162.33 ND
41 2 ,4-Oinitrotoluane
0
.2702
0
28
824.92 ND
42 2 ,6-Dinitrotoluene
0
.2125
0
28
1049.28 NO
43 Diethylphthalate
0
. 8088
0
28
275.63 NO
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
20CO
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
D-96
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
801-10 Capitol* Drive
Research Triangle Park, NC 27713
Telephone: (919) 544-5729
QUANTITATION
NAME
DATA FILE:F881602 SAMPLE ID 3-7C-OUT-MM5 {1:100 OILN)
RF FILE: FB81504 DILN FACTOR 200
DATE: 07/09/90
TLI Project Number: 15968
ANALYSIS OATE: 07/06/90
REPORT
it8ssisx:::sis:::ss8:sxsxsx:::ssasss2::::::::;:::s:siEssss::sss33::::s
AREA RF SCAN ISID AMOUNT, ug CODE OUAN LIMIT
44 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylother
0
.4413
0
28
505.12 NO
2000
45 Fluorene
0
1.0694
0
28
208.46 NO
2000
46 4-Nitroani1ine
0
.2353
0
28
947.49 NO
2000
47 Phervanthrene-diO
1046
847
47
IS
48 4,6-D1nitro-2-nethy1phenol
0
.0266
0
47
5744.78 ND
2000
49 N-N1tro*odiphenylan1ne(1)
0
.5190
0
47
294.65 NO
2000
50 4-Bro«ophenyl-pheny1ether
0
.1274
0
47
1200.11 ND
2000
51 HexacMorobenzene
0
.1401
0
47
1091.98 ND
2000
52 Pentachlorophenol
0
.0284
0
47
5393.02 ND
2000
53 Phenanthrene
0
1.0488
0
47
145.85 NO
2000
54 Anthracene
0
.7975
0
47
191.76 ND
2000
55 D1-n-buty1phtha1ate
0
.7873
0
47
194.27 ND
2000
56 Fluoranthene
0
.8510
0
47
179.72 ND
2000
57 Chrysene-d12
0
0
57
IS
58 Pyrene
0
2.6306
0
57
ERR NO
2000
59 Butylbenzylphthalate
0
1.0210
0
57
ERR NO
2000
60 3,3'-0ichlorobenz1dine
0
. 1905
0
57
ERR NO
2000
61 Benzo(a)anthracene
0
.5917
0
57
ERR ND
2000
62 Chryeene
0
1.3525
0
57
ERR NO
2000
63 b1s(2-Ethy1hexy1)phthalate
0
.4956
0
57
ERR ND
2000
64 Perylene-d12
79
1501
64
IS
65 01-n-octylphthalate
0
.9707
0
64
2088.56 ND
2000
66 Benio(b)f "luoranthene
0
.8181
0
64
2478.23 ND
2000
67 Benzo(k)fluoranthene
0
1 .6757
0
64
1209.85 NO
2000
68 Benzo(a)pyrene
0
1.4188
0
64
1428.97 ND
2000
69 Indeno( 1,2 ,3-cd)pyrer»e
0
.5777
0
64
3509.11 ND
2000
70 D1bonz(a,h)anthrac0no
0
.6305
0
64
3215.61 ND
2000
71 Benzo(g,h,1)pery1ene
0
1.0703
0
64
1894.19 ND
2000
ft R 0 G A T E SUMMARY
AREA
RF
SCAN
ISIO
AMOUNT CODE
X RECOVERY
72 Nitrotoenzerve-d5
0
.2240
0
14
.00 ND
.0
73 2-Fluoroblphenyl
0
.5997
0
28
.00 NO
.0
74 Terpheny1-d14
0
.4672
0
57
ERR NO
ERR
75 Phenol-d5
0
.8310
0
1
.00 NO
.0
76 2-Fluorophenol
0
.5721
0
1
.00 NO
.0
77 2,4 ,6-Tribronophenol
0
.0242
0
28
.00 NO
.0
D-97
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
801-10 Capitola Orive
Reaearch Triangle Park, NC
Telephone: (919) 544-5729
QUANTITATION REPO
NAME
DATA FILE:FB81009 SAMPLE ID 4-7C-MID-MM5
27713 RF FILE: FB6C9 DILN FACTOR 2
DATE: 07/09/90
TLI Project Number: 15966
ANALY9IS DATE: 07/03/90
R T
AREA RF SCAN
ISID AMOUNT, ug CODE OUAN LIMIT
1 1,4-0^ch1orobehzene-d4
416
75
1
IS
2 Phenol
2770
1.5257
50
1
349.00 D
20
3 bis(2-Ch1oroethy1)ether
0
1.2341
0
1
3.11 ND
20
4 2-Chlorophenol
0
1.2481
0
1
3.08 ND
20
5 1,3-0ich1orobenzene
0
1 .4692
0
1
2.62 NO
20
6 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0
1.5313
0
1
2.51 NO
20
7 Benzyl alcohol
53653
.4837
133
1
21321.69 D
20
8 1,2-D1ch1orobenzene
71
1 .4079
98
1
9.76 E
20
9 2-Wethylphenol
0
1.1881
0
1
3.30 ND
20
10 bia(2-Ch1oroiaopropy1)ether
0
2.3815
0
1
1.61 NO
20
11 4-Methylphenol
217
1.0276
176
1
40.55 0
20
12 N-Nitroso-di-n-propy1amine
0
1.0912
0
1
3.52 ND
20
13 Hexachloroethane
0
.3238
0
1
11.87 NO
20
14 Naphtha1ene-d8
972
289
14
IS
15 Nitrobenzene
0
.5786
0
14
2.84 NO
20
16 Iaophorone
0
.9021
0
14
1.82 ND
20
17 2-Nitrophenol
277
.1513
226
14
150.74 0
20
18 2,4-Oinethylphenol
0
.3610
0
14
4.56 ND
20
19 Benzoic acid
33079
.1552
407
14
17539.71 D
20
20 bis(2-Chloro«thoxy)ai8tharte
0
.3741
0
14
4.40 ND
20
21 2,4-Dichlorophenol
0
.3538
0
14
4.65 ND
20
22 1,2,4-TrichloroBenzene
0
.5944
0
14
2.77 ND
20
23 Naphthalene
0
1.1453
0
14
1.44 ND
20
24 4-Ch1oroaniline
0
.2409
0
14
6.83 ND
20
25 Hexachlorobutadieno
0
. 2446
0
14
6.73 ND
20
25 4-CMoro-3-«ethy1pheno1
0
.3056
0
14
5.38 ND
20
27 2-Methylnaphthalene
0
.7696
0
14
2.14 NO
20
28 Acenaphthene-d10
787
595
28
IS
29 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
0
.1472
0
28
13.82 NO
20
30 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
0
.4849
0
28
4.20 ND
20
31 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
0
.6083
0
28
3.34 ND
20
32 2-Chloronaphthalene
0
1.1721
0
28
1.74 ND
20
33 2-NitroaniHne
0
.5275
0
28
3.86 NO
20
34 Dinethylphthalate
0
1.3735
0
28
1.48 ND
20
35 Acenaphthylene
0
1.5087
0
28
1.35 ND
20
36 3-Nitroaniline
0
. 1648
0
28
12.34 ND
20
37 Acenaphthene
0
1.1378
0
28
1.79 ND
20
38 2,4-Dinitrophenol
0
.0801
0
28
25.39 ND
20
39 4-Nitrophenol
353
.0855
671
28
419.69 D
20
40 Dibenzofuran
0
1.8332
0
28
1.11 ND
20
41 2 , 4-Oinitrotoluone
0
.3271
0
28
6.22 ND
20
42 2,6-Dinitrotoluene
0
. 2797
0
28
7.27 NO
20
43 Diethylphthalate
0
1.0448
0
28
1.95 NO
20
D-98
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, IMC.
801-10 Capitola Drtvs
Rasaarch Triangla Park, NC 27713
Talaphonar (919) 544-5729
QUANTITATION
DATA FILE:F881009 SAMPLE 10 4-7C-MI0-MM5
RF FILE: FB809 DILN FACTOR 2
DATE: 07/09/90
TLI Project Number: 15960
ANALYSIS DATE: 07/03/90
REPORT
S8XSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
:s:e:s3S33cist3:
:33s:c3s>asss:ss:ss::::
NAME
AREA
RF
SCAN ISIO
AMOUNT, ug CODE
QUAN LIMIT
44 4-CMorophenyf-phenylather
0
1.0162
0
28
2.00 ND
20
45 Fluorena
0
1.4392
0
28
1.41 NO
20
46 4-N4troani1Sne
0
.1498
0
28
13.58 NO
20
47 Prtananthrena-dlO
2771
860
47
19
48 4,6-Oin1tro-2-Bathy1phanol
0
.0354
0
47
16.31 NO
20
49 N-N1tro»odiphenylaflhne(1)
0
.3807
0
47
1.52 NO
20
50 4-Brooopheny1-pK«nyl«thar
0
.1553
0
47
3.72 NO
20
51 Hexachlorobenzene
0
.1394
0
47
4.14 ND
20
52 Pentachlorophenol
0
.0303
0
47
19.04 NO
20
53 Phenanthrene
0
1.1598
0
47
.50 ND
20
S4 Anthracene
0
1.1101
0
47
.52 NO
20
55 Di-n-butylphthalate
0
.6613
0
47
.87 ND
20
56 Fluoranthene
0
1.7081
0
47
.34 NO
20
57 Chryaene-d12
5744
1321
57
IS
58 Pyrene
0
1.7571
0
57
.16 ND
20
59 Butylbenzylphthalata
0
.4937
0
57
.56 ND
20
60 3,3'-Dich1orobenzidine
0
.1068
0
57
2.61 ND
20
61 Benzo(a)anthracene
0
1.3685
0
57
.20 ND
20
62 Chryaene
0
1.3009
0
57
.21 NO
20
63 bie(2-Ethylhexy1)phtha1ate
7354
.7254
1364
57
141.18 D
20
64 Perylene-d12
0
0
64
IS
65 Oi-n-octylphthalate
0
3.1428
0
64
ERR ND
20
66 Benzo(b)fluoranthena
0
2.2061
0
64
ERR ND
20
67 Benzo{k)fluoranthene
0
2.5592
0
64
ERR ND
20
68 Benzo(a)pyrene
0
1.7546
0
64
ERR ND
20
69 Indeno(1, 2,3-cd)pyrene
0
.8215
0
64
ERR ND
20
70 Oibenz(a,h)anthracene
0
1.0083
0
64
ERR ND
20
71 Benzo(g,h,1Jperylarw
0
1.1378
0
64
ERR ND
20
SURROGATE SUMMARY
AREA
RF
SCAN
ISID
AMOUNT COOE
X RECOVERY
72 Nitrobenzene-d5
290
.3562
169
14
67.00 0
134.0
73 2-Fluorobiphenyl
360
.7861
488
28
49.18 0
98.4
74 Terphenyl-d14
1438
.6017
1162
57
33.29 D
66.6
75 Phenol-d5
682
. 7144
48
1
183.49 0
183.5
76 2-Fluorophenol
0
.7165
0
1
.00 ND
.0
77 2,4,6-Tribrooophenol
194
.0414
740
28
475.81 D
475.8
D-99
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
001-10 Capitol* Drive
Research Triangle Park, NC 27713
Telephone: (919) S44-5729
QUANTITATION
NAME
4-7C-MID-MM5 (1:100 D1LN)
200
DATA FILE:FB81603 SAMPLE ID
RF FILE: FB81504 DILN FACTOR
DATE: 07/09/90
TLI Project Number: 15908
ANALYSIS DATE:
REPORT
AREA RF SCAN ISID AMOUNT, ug CODE QUAN LIMIT
07/06/90
1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4
432
60
1
IS
2 Phenol
0
1.1577
0
1
320.09 ND
3 bia(Z-Chloroethyl)ether
0
1.1357
0
1
326.29 ND
4 2-Chlorophenol
0
1.1506
0
1
322.09 ND
5 1,3-Oichlorobenzene
0
1.2920
0
1
266.83 ND
6 1,4-0ich1orobenzene
0
1.4004
0
1
264.62 ND
7 Benzyl alcohol
215
.5147
96
1
7755.30 D
8 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
0
1.2386
0
1
299.19 ND
9 2-Methylphenol
0
.8767
0
1
422.68 NO
10 bie(2-Chloroi»opropyl)ether
0
1.2627
0
1
288.90 NO
11 4-Methylphenol
0
.7723
0
1
479.82 NO
12 N-Nitroeo-di-n-propylamin«
0
.8844
0
1
419.01 NO
13 Hexachloroethane
0
.5105
0
1
725.97 NO
14 Naphthalene-d8
1325
271
14
IS
15 Nitrobenzene
0
.4254
0
14
283.73 NO
16 Isophorone
0
.6024
0
14
200.39 ND
17 2-Nitrophenol
0
.1219
0
14
990.22 ND
18 2,4-Oieethylpnenol
0
.2622
0
14
460.44 NO
19 Benzoic acid
178
.1284
284
14
8364.71 D
20 bis(2-Ch1oroethoxy)Mthane
0
.3515
0
14
343.45 ND
21 2,4-Dichlorophenol
0
.2108
0
14
572.58 ND
22 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
39
.2895
266
14
807.69 E
23 Naphthalene
0
.9398
0
14
128.45 ND
24 4-Ch1oroaa111 no
0
.3244
0
1 4
372.09 NO
25 Hexachlorobutadiene
0
.1521
0
14
793.81 NO
26 4-Chloro-3-«ethylphenol
0
.1736
0
14
671.96 ND
27 2-Methylnaphthalene
0
.6264
0
14
192.71 NO
28 Acenaphthene-d10
685
583
28
IS
29 Kexachlorocyclopentadiene
0
.0854
0
28
2736.47 ND
30 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
0
.2453
0
28
952.57 ND
31 2,4,5-TriChlorophenol
0
.3047
0
28
766.99 ND
32 2-Chloronaphthalen«
0
.9935
0
28
235.20 ND
33 2-N1troani1 ine
0
.3977
0
26
587.55 ND
34 Dimethylphthalate
0
.9350
0
28
249.93 ND
35 Acenaphthylene
0
1.4188
0
28
164.72 ND
30 3-Nitroaniline
0
.1964
0
28
1189.94 ND
37 Acenaphthene
0
.9146
0
28
255.51 NO
38 2 ,4-Dinitrophenol
0
.1972
0
28
1184.88 NO
39 4-Nitrophenol
0
.0821
0
28
2846.33 ND
40 Dibenzofurart
0
1.3733
0
28
170.16 ND
41 2,4-0initrotolueno
0
. 2702
0
28
864.70 ND
42 2,6-Dinitrotoluene
0
.2125
0
28
1099.88 ND
43 D iethy1phthalate
0
.8088
0
28
268.92 ND
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
20C0
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
D-100-
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
801-10 C*p-itola Driva DATA FILE:PB81B03 SAMPLE ZD 4-7C-HID-MM5 (1:100 OILN)
Research Triangle Park, MC 27713 RF FILE: FB81504 OILN FACTOR 200
Telephone: (919) 544-5729 DATE: 07/09/90
TLX Project Number: 15968
ANALYSIS DATE: 07/06/90
QUANTITATION REPORT
NAME
AREA
RF
SCAN
ISID
AMOUNT, ug CODE
QUAN LIMIT
44 4-Chlorophanyl-phenylether
0
.4413
0
28
529.48 NO
2000
45 Fluorene
0
1.0694
0
26
218.52 NO
2000
46 4-NitroanlHne
0
.2353
0
28
993.18 ND
2000
47 Phenarrthrene-dlO
934
847
47
IS
48 4,6-01nttro-2-aethylpheno1
0
.0266
0
47
6433.12 ND
2000
49 N-N4trosod^phenyl*fflAne(1)
0
.5190
0
47
329.96 ND
2C00
50 4-Bromophenyl-pKerylother
0
.1274
0
47
1343.90 ND
2000
51 Hexachlorobenzene
0
.1401
0
47
1222.62 ND
2C00
52 Pentachlorophenol
0
.0284
0
47
6039.21 ND
2000
53 Phenanthrene
0
1.0486
0
47
163.32 ND
2000
54 Anthracene
0
.7975
0
47
214.74 ND
2000
55 D1-n-buty1phtha1ate
0
.7873
0
47
217.54 NO
2000
56 Fluorantherve
0
.8510
0
47
201.26 NO
2000
57 Chryaer>e-d12
157
1302
57
IS
58 Pyrene
0
2.6306
0
57
388.57 ND
2000
59 Butylbenzylphthalate
0
1.0210
0
57
1001.12 ND
2000
60 3,3'-Oichlorot>enz1d1ne
0
.1905
0
57
5365.40 NO
2000
61 Benzo(a)anthracene
0
.5917
0
57
1727.60 NO
2000
62 Chryaene
0
1.3525
0
57
755.75 NO
2000
63 b1a(2-Ethylhixyl)phthalate
0
.4956
0
57
2062.40 ND
2000
64 Perylene-dl2
118
502
64
IS
65 Dl-n-octylphthalate
0
.9707
0
64
1396.85 ND
2000
66 B#nzo(b)f1uoranth«n«
0
.6181
0
64
1657.46 ND
2000
67 Benzo(k)fluoranthene
0
1.6757
0
64
809.16 ND
2000
68 8enzo(a}pyrer>e
0
1 .4188
0
64
955.72 ND
2000
69 Indeno(1,2,3-ed)pyrene
0
.5777
0
64
2346.94 ND
2000
70 Dibenz(a,h)anthracorve
0
.6305
0
64
2150.64 ND
2000
71 Benzo(g,h,1Jperylene
0
1.0703
0
64
1265.86 ND
2000
[ROQATE SUMMARY
AREA
RF
SCAN
ISID
AMOUNT COOE
X RECOVERY
72
N1trobenzene-d5
0
.2240
0
14
.00
ND
.0
73
2-F1uorobipheny1
0
.5997
0
28
.00
NO
.0
74
Terphenyl-d14
0
.4672
0
57
.00
ND
.0
75
Ph«no1-dS
0
.6310
0
1
.00
ND
.0
76
2-Fluorophenol
0
.5721
0
1
.00
ND
.0
77
2,4,6-T ri broaophenol
0
.0242
0
26
.00
ND
.0
D-101
-------
7B
SEMIVOLATILE CONTINUING CALIBRATION CHECK
Lab Name:Triangle Labs, Inc. Contract:68-01-7407
Lab Code: TRILAB Case No.: ***** SAS No.: ****** SDG No.: *****
-\
Instrument ID: F Calibration Date:07/03/90 Time:1255
Lab File ID: FBB09 Init. Calib. Date(s): 07/02/90 07/02/90
Min RRF50 for SPCCC#) = 0.050
Max 7.D -for CCC<*) = 25.07.
COMPOUND S
Phenol *
bis(2-Chloroethy1)ether I
2-Chlorophenol !
1.3-Dichlorobenzene !
1.4-Dichlorobenzene *
Benzyl alcohol {
1,2-Dichlorobenzene I
2—Methylphenol !
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl>ether!
4-Methylphenol I
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine #
Hexachloroethane !
Nitrobenzene !
Isophorone !
2—Nitrophenol *
2,4-Dimethy1 phenol 1
Benzoic acid S
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane !
2,4-Dichlorophenol *
1.2.4-Trichlorobenzene !
Naphthalene !
4-ChloroaniIine t
Hexachlorobutadiene *
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol *
2-flethy 1 naphtha 1 ene !
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene #
2,4,6-T richloropheno1 *
2.4.5-T richlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
2—Ni troan i1ine
Dimethylphthaiate
Acenaphthy1ene
2,6-Din i trotoluene
3—Nitroaniline
Acenaphthene *
2,4-Dinitrophenol #
4— Ni tropheno 1 tt
RRF !RRF50
7.D
1.432)
1.1391
1. 115!
1.533!
1.577!
0.409!
1.4551
0.852:
2.005:
0.786:
i.167:
0.398:
0.570:
0.802;
0.166:
0.293!
0.144:
0.390:
0.447:
0.601:
i.130:
0.353!
0.303:
0.253:
0.994:
0.128!
0.456!
0.550!
1.242!
0.380:
i.218:
i.709:
0.306!
0.199:
1.L52:
0.079:
0.089:
1.526:
1.234:
1.248!
1.469:
l.531:
0.484:
i.408:
i.i66:
2.382'
1.028!
1.091i
0.324!
0.579!
0.902!
0.151!
0.361:
0.155!
0.37 4!
0.354:
0.594 1
1.145!
0.24i:
0.245:
0.306;
0.770!
0.147!
0.485!
0.608!
l.172:
0.527!
1.373!
l .509:
0.280:
0.165!
i.i3s;
0.080:
0.086:
-6.5*
-8.31
-12.0;
4.2:
2.9*
-i8.i:
3.2!
-36.0 1
-is.b:
-30.8!
6.5#
18.7 !
-1.4:
-12.5:
9.0*
-23.l:
-7.5;
4.0;
20.8*
l. l:
-l .4:
31 .b:
19 . 3*
-20.8*
22.6 :
-14.9#
-6.3*
-10,5;
5.6!
-38.9!
-12.8!
ii.7:
a.7:
17.0!
1 .2*
-1 .3#
3.8#
FORM VI I SV-1
D-102
-------
7C
SEMIVOLATILE CONTINUING CALIBRATION CHECK
Lab NamesTriangle Labs, Inc. Contract:60-01-7407
Lab Code: TRILAB Case No.: ***** SAS No.: ****** SDG No.: *****
Instrument ID: F Calibration Date:07/03/90 Time:1255
Lab File ID: FB809 Init. Calib. Date(s): 07/02/90 07/02/90
Min RRF50 for^SPCC<#) = 0.050 Max 7.D for CCC (*) = 25.07.
1
1
J
1
r
COMPOUND :
RRF J RRF50 !
7.D
)ibenzofuran S
1.734 3
1.833!
-5.7
2,4-Dinitrotoluene !
0.378!
0.327!
13.5
Diethy1phthai ate i
0.879!
1 .045!
-18.8
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether !
0.793!
1.016:
-28.2
rluorene !
1.4031
1.439;
-2.6
4-Nitroani1ine «
0.203:
0.150;
26.4
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol !
0.036:
0.035:
0.5
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine<(1> *
0.430!
0.38i:
11.6*
4—Bromopheny1—phenyl ether
0.141:
0.1551
-9.8:
Hexachlorobenzene
0.114!
0.139!
-22. 1
:
Pentachlorophenol *
0.032!
0.030!
6.0*
'henanthrene
1 . 13B'.
1.160J
-2.0:
Anthracene
i.017:
1.110!
-9.2
i
Di-n-buty1phthaiate
0.767!
0.661!
13.8!
Fluoranthene
1 .423
1.708:
-20.0*
Pyrene
2.4881
1.757!
29.4!
Butylbenzylphthalate
0.581:
0.494!
15.0
:
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
0.166 i
0.1071
35.6
5
Benzo(a)anthracene
1.426!
1.369!
4.0
1
Chrysene
1.491!
i.301:
12.8
b is(2—£thy1hexy1)phthalate
0.873!
0.725:
16.9;
Di-n—octy1phthaiate
3.237!
3.143!
2.9*
Den zo(b)iluoranthene
2.377!
2.206!
7.21
8enzo(k)fluoranthene
3.127!
2.559!
18. 1 !
Benzo(a > pyrene
C 2.059!
1.755!
14.8*
Indeno<1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1 .276!
0.822!
35.6!
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
i .604:
1.008!
37. i:
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
i.73i:
1.138!
34.3
BBSSSSS=SSSSSSSSSS=aSSS3=3B:
SSBKBBSB
BSSSSBB
SSSSCS
1
I
2-Fluorophenol
0.614!
0.717!
-16.7!
Phenol-d5
: 0.862!
0.7141
17.21
Nitrobenzene-d5
! 0.306!
0.356!
-16.5!
2-Fluorobiphenyl
i 0.850!
0.786 1
7.6 !
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
: 0.036!
0.041;
-14.i:
Terpheny1—d14
: 0.710!
0.602!
15.3!
( 1 ) Cannot be separated -from
D ipheny1amine
FORM VII
SV-2
r D-103
-------
6B
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS INITIAL CALIBRATION DATA
Lab Name:Triangle Labs, Inc. Contract:68-01-7407
Lab Code: TRILAB Case No.: ***** SA5 No.: ****** SDG No.: *****
Instrument ID: F
din RRF for SPCt(#)
Calibration Date(s):07/02/90 07/02/90
0.050 Max 7.RSD -for CCC(*) = 30.07.
LAB FILE ID:
RRF80 =FB80502
RRF20 —FB80503
RRF120=FB80501
RRF50 -FB80504
RRF160=FB805
COMPOUND
.'RRF20 ! RRF50 ! RRFB0 J RRF 120 S RRF 160 J RRF
! 1 9^9999 • 999Ef»«l
y.
RSD
Phenol * 1.0131
bis(2—Chloroethy1)ether ! 0.879!
2-Chlorophenol I 0.959!
1.3-Dichlorobenzene ! 1.4975
1.4-Dichlorobenzene * 1.512!
Benzyl alcohol I 0.310!
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ! 1.4295
2-Methy1 phenol ! 0.688!
bis(2-Chloroisopropy1)ether! 2.073!
4-Methylphenol ! 0.586!
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine # 1,047I
Hexachloroethane I 0.372!
Nitrobenzene ! 0.542!
Isophorone ! 0.656!
2-Nitropheno1 * 0.148!
2,4-Dimethylphenol ! 0.202.
Benzoic acid ! !
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane ! 0.293!
2,4-Dichlorophenol * 0.417!
1.2.4—Trichlorobenzene ! 0.632!
Naphthalene ! 1.025!
4-Chloroaniline ! 0.276!
Hexachlorobutadiene * 0.324!
4-Chloro-3-methyIphenol * 0.198!
2—Methylnaphthalene ! 0.917!
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene # 0.065!
2,4,6—Trichlorophenol * 0.390!
2.4.5-Trichlorophenol ! !
2-Chloronaphthalene ! 1.216!
2-Nitroaniline ! !
Dimethylphthalate ! 1.201!
Acenaphthylene ! 1.602!
2,6—Dinitrotoluene ! 0.290!
3-Nitroani1ine ! !
Acenaphthene * 1.104!
2,4-Dinitropheno1 !
4-Ni tropheno 1 # !
1.219!
1.100!
1.072!
1.497!
1.564!
0.3961
1.420!
0.884!
1.999 I
0.788!
1.223!
0.413!
0.599!
0.861!
0.1581
0.294!
0. 144:
0.395!
0.431!
0.6011
1.127!
0.355!
0.323!
0.248!
0.965!
0.123!
0.455!
0.5831
1.237!
0.429!
1.2431
1 .744!
0-299!
0.201:
i.15B:
0.066!
0.084!
1.530!
1.110!
1.111 !
1.534!
1.578!
0.421! 0.
1.478! I.
0.820! 0.
2.129! I.
0.786! 0.
1.233! 1.
0.391! 0.
0.596! 0.
0.830! 0.
0.196!
0.305!
0.167!
0.401 I
0.484!
0.643!
1.134!
0.383!
0.326!
0.265;
1.060!
0.151!
0.505!
0.505!
1.260!
0.374!
1.280!
1.754!
0.309!
0.204! 0
1.164! 1
0.093! 0
0.09B! 0
479 !
103!
071 !
4B3!
518!
405!
397!
811 !
948!
770!
1 19!
380 !
534!
742!
181 !
290!
139!
3691
.454!
,571 !
,067!
.3561
.272!
. 246:
.975!
.143!
.440!
.511 !
. 186!
.333!
.2131
.624!
.294!
. 1961
.095 :
.087 !
.087:
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
0.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
1 .
0.
0.
0.
1 .
0.
1 .
1 .
0.
0
1
0
0
920!
506 !
362'.
653!
714:
516!
550!
057!
878!
000:
216!
435!
581 !
919!
148!
375:
128!
4921
448 :
558!
,295!
.397!
.271 !
.308!
.055!
. 159!
.490!
.523!
.310!
.382!
. 154!
.822!
.339 !
. 193!
.237!
.070!
.087!
1.432!
1.139!
1.115!
1.5331
I.577!
0.410!
I.455;
0.852!
2.005!
0.786!
1.168!
0.3981
0.571!
0.802!
0.166!
0.293!
0. 144!
0.390 1
0.447!
0.601!
I.130!
0.3531
0.303!
0.253!
0.995!
0. 128!
0.456!
0.550!
1.2421
0.380!
1 . 2 L B :
1 .709!
0.306!
0. 199!
1.152;
0.079:
0.089!
23.0*
19.0 :
13.0:
4.0!
5.0*
17.0!
4.0 !
15.0!
4.0!
18.0!
6.0#
6.0!
5.0!
12.0!
12.0*
20.0!
11 .0!
18.01
5.0*
6.0!
9.0 1
13,0!
9.0*
15.0*
6.0J
29.0#
9.0*
7.0!
3.0!
10.0 !
3.01
5.0!
6.0 !
2.0 !
4 . 0*
16.04
6. 0#
FORM VI SV-1
>.
- D-104
-------
6C
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS INITIAL CALIBRATION DATA
Lab Name:Triang1e Labs, Inc. Contract:68—01—7407
L_ab Code: TRILAB Case No.: ***** SAS No.: ****** SDG No.: *****
Instrument ID: F Calibration Date(s>:07/02/90 07/02/90
Min RRF for SPCC(tt) = 0.050 Max 7.RSD -for CCC<*) = 30.07.
LAB FILE ID:
RRFB0 «FBB0502
RRF20 =FB80503
RRF120=FB80501
RRF50 =FB80504
RRF160S=FB805
COMPOUND
Dibenzo-f uran
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Diethy 1phthai ate
4-Chloropheny1-phenylether
Fluorene
4-Nitroani1ine
4,6-Dinitro-2-methy1 phenol
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine((1)
4—Bromopheny1 —phenyl ether
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Di-n—butyIphthaiate
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Buty1 benzylphtha1 ate
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
bis(2-Ethy1hexy1Jphthalate
Di-n-octy1phthalate
Benzo ( b) -f 1 uo ran then e
Benzo(k)fluoran thene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Indeno <1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)pery1ene
RRF20 SRRF50 JRRF80 IRRF120 !RRF160 I RRF !
*/.
RSD
1.675!
0.319!
0.8931
0.8041
1.352!
0.465:
0.145 J
0.i0i:
1.131S
1 .058!
0.640!
1.204!
2.530!
0.400!
0.112:
1.163!
1.528 1
0,607 1
3.1661
1.427!
2.4331
1.218!
1.174!
1.281i
1.&34!
1.722 «
0.363!
0.875!
0.831»
1.389!
0.228!
0.032!
0.482!
0.170!
0.137!
0.025!
1.155!
1 .056',
0.737!
1.577!
2.314!
0.511!
0.129!
1.397!
l.440;
0.760:
3.257!
2.115;
3.069;
1.853:
i.194:
1.614!
1.332 J
1.794J
0.422!
0.882!
0.846!
1.456!
0.185!
0.045!
0.4371
0.145:
0.114:
0.036:
l.216:
1.0821
0.8571
1.627!
2.708 I
0.665!
0.159!
I.555!
1.447;
0.990!
3.209!
2.8321
3.655!
2.318!
1.129!
1.447!
1.673!
1.690: i.
0.399: 0.
0.862! 0.
0.735! 0.
1.370: i.
0.197: 0.
0.037! 0.
0.406: 0.
0.119!
0.100!
0.033!
1.112!
0.98l:
0.808:
1.424!
2.765!
0.723!
0.171!
1.501:
i.507;
l.089;
3.049:
2.474:
3.283!
2.152!
1.1B3J
1.440!
1.752!
787:
389!
884 !
748!
446 !
204 1
030 :
363!
1281
120:
036!
074 I
908;
793!
284!
122!
607!
258!
5121
536 1
.918;
,505:
,035:
, 193;
,755!
.699!
.2*7!
.264!
1.734!
0.378:
0.879;
0.7931
1.403:
0.203:
0.036!
0.430!
0.141!
0.ii4:
0.032:
i.i3B:
l.017:
0.767!
1.423:
2.488!
0.581:
0.166:
1.426;
i . 491:
0.873!
3.237 i
2.377!
3. 127i
2.059!
1.276!
i.604:
l.731:
3.0!
10.0 1
i .0:
6.0!
3.0!
8.0!
19.0!
10.0*
13.0!
13.01
16.0*
4.0;
7.01
10.0:
12.0*
10.0!
22.0!
34.0!
11.0:
3.0:
21 .0!
5.0*
26.0:
14.0:
27.0*
18.0!
23.0J
19.0!
2-Fluorophenol
Phenol-d5
Nitrobenzene-d5
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2,4,6-Tri bromopheno1
Terpheny1 —d14
0.431! 0.556!
619! 0.615! 0.849!
0.628! 0.804! 0.864! 0.873! 1.143 J
0.2561 0.326 1 0.320! 0.2891 0.33B!
0.8521 0.852! 0.884! 0.805! 0.859:
E.029I 0.0311 0.040! 0.0421 0.040!
0.577: 0.6421 0.852: 0.800! 0.681!
0.614 2
0.862!
0.306!
0.B51!
0.036:
0.710:
24.0!
21 .0!
10.0!
3.0!
17.0:
15.0:
(1) Cannot be separated -from Dipheny 1 amine
FORM VI SV-2
D-105
-------
Lab Code: 7RILAB Case to.: ***** SAS to.: ****** SDG to.: *****
Lab File ID: FB81504 Init. Calib. Date(s): 07/06/90 07/06/90
7B
SEMIVO-ATILE CONTINUING CALIBRATION CHECK
COT'FOLJND ! RRF 1RRF50 ! YD
! Phenol * 1.2901 1.158.' 10.8*
!bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether ! 1.161! 1.1361 2.2!
!2-Chlorophenol ! 1.161! 1.151! 0.9!
!1,3-Dichlorobenzene ! 1.343! 1.272! 3.8!
! 1,4-Dichlorobenzene * 1.39Q! 1.400! -0.2*
IBenzyl alcohol i 0.512! 0.515! H3.5I
!1,2-Dichlorobenzene ! 1.261! 1.2CT! l.B!
!2-Methylphenol i 0.928! 0.877! 5.5!
!bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether! 1.454! 1.283! 11.8!
!4H1ethylphenol ! 0.787 ! 0.772! 1.9!
IN-Nitroso-di-n—propylamine # 0.949! 0.884! 6.8#
'Hexachloroethane ! 0.513! 0.510! 0.51
'Nitrobenzene ! 0.460! 0.425! 7.6!
!Isophorone ! 0.637! 0.602! 5.5!
!2-Nitrupheno1 * 0.119! 0.122! -2.7*
12,4-Dimethylphenol ! 0.278! 0.262! 5.9!
IBenzoic acid ! 0.109! 0.128! -17.3!
! bis <2-Chloroethoxy> methane ! 0.373! 0.351! 5.7!
!2,4-DichlorophenoI * 0.226! 0.211! 6.6*
11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ! 0.298! 0.239! 2.7!
iNaphthalene 0.959 : 0.9401 2.0.'
!4-Chioroaniline ! 0.316! 0.324; -2.6!
!Hexachlorobutadiene * 0.159! 0.152! 4.6*
!4-Chloro-3-methylphenol * 0.184! 0.180! 2.6*
!2-ftethylnaphthalene ! 0.668 ! 0.626 ! 6.3!
IHexachlorocyclopentadiene # 0.103! 0.065! 17.1#
!2,4,6-Trichlorophenol * 0.254! 0.245 ! 3.2*
!2,4>5—Trichlorophenol ! 0.324 ! 0.305! 5.9!
!2-Chloronaphthalene ! 0.973! 0.994! -2.1!
!2-Nitroaniline ! 0.409! 0.398 ! 2.4!
IDimethylphthalate 0.957 ! 0.935 ; 2.3!
!Acenaphthylene 5 1.435! 1.419! 1.1!
12,6-Dinitrotoluene ! 0.221! 0.212! 3.B!
!3-Nitroaniline 1 0.1871 0.1961 -5.0!
!Acenaphthene * 0.951! 0.915'. 3.8#
!2,4-Dinitrophenol tt 0.291! 0.197! 29.9#
!4—Nitrophenol # 0.103! 0.082! 20.3#
FORM VII SV-1
D-106
4
-------
7C
SEMIVGLATILE CONTINJING CALIBRATION OECK
Lab Name:Triangle L^abs, Inc. Contract:68-01-7407
Lab Code: TP I LAB Case No.: ***** SAS No.: ****** SDG No.: *****
Instrument ID: F Calibration Date:07/06/90 Time:1257
Lab File ID: FB81504 Init. Calib. Date(s): 07/06/90 07/06/90
Min RRF50 -for SPCC(#) = 0.050 Max '/JD for CCCC*) « 25.07.
1
t i 1
1 I *
I
: COMPOUND
i RRF JRRF50 !
7X> :
IDibenzofuran
! 1.368! 1.373!
-0.4:
!2,4-Dinitrotoluene
i 0.2711 0.2701
0. i:
'Diethy1phtha1ate
! 0.817! 0.8391
1.1!
I4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
! 0,443! 0.441!
0.5:
IFluorene
; 1.079! 1-0691
0.9!
J 4-Nitroaniline
: 0.204! 0.2351
-15.i:
5 4,6-0 i n i tro-2-tne t hy 1 pheno 1
1 0.039! 0.0271
32.3!
!N-Nitrosadiphenyiamine( (1)
* 0.507: 0.519!
-2.3*
J 4—Bromophenyl-phenylether
! 0.1331 0.127!
4.3!
•Hexachlorobenzene
: 0.149! 0.140:
6.3!
! Pentachlorophenol
* 0.032: 0.028!
12.5*
!Phenanthrene
! 1.044! 1.049!
-0.5!
• Anthracene
i 0.750! 0.798!
-6.3!
!Di-n-butylphthalate
! 0.938! 0.787!
16.1!
! F luoran thene
* 0.883! 0.851!
3.6*
IPyrene
! 3.052: 2.631!
13.8:
! Butylbenzyl phthalate
! 1.236! 1.0211
17.4!
53,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
! 0.242! 0.191!
21.31
!Benzo(a) anthracene
J 0.777! 0.592!
23.8!
SChrysene
! 1.344! 1.353!
-0.71
!bis(2-EthylhexylJphthalate
1 0.972! 0.496!
43.2!
5Di-n-octy1phtha1ate
* 0.897! 0.971!
-8.3*
! Ben zo(b)f1noranthene
! 0.796J 0.813!
-2.8!
SBenzo pyrene
! 0.446: 0.578!
-29.41
: Diben z (a, h) an thracene
; 0.564: 0.630:
-u.9:
' Benzo < g, h, i) pery lene
! 0.937! 1.070!
-14.3:
2-Fluorophenol
! 0.648! 0.572!
11.8!
<'Phenol-d5
i 0.806! 0.031:
6.2:
!Nitrobenzene—d5
! 0.239! 0.224!
6.2:
!2-FluorobiphenyI
I 0.567! 0.600!
-2.1!
¦2,4,6-Tribromophenol
! 0.024! 0.024!
0.9!
.* Terpheny 1 -d 14
1
1
0.643J 0.467:
27.3!
(1) Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine
FORM VII SV-2
D-107
-------
6B
SEMI VOLATILE ORGWICS INITIAL CALIBRATION DATA
Lab Name:Triangle Labs, Inc. Contract:68-01-7407
Lab Code: TRILAB Case No.: ***** SA5 No.: ****** SDG No.: *****
Instrument ID: F
Calibration Date(s):07/06/90
07/06/90
Min RflF for SPCC(tt) = 0.050
Max XRSD -for CCC(*) = 30.0*/.
LAB FILE ID:
RRF80 ^81502
RRF20 «FB81503
RRF12B=FB81501
RRF50 =FB81504
RRF160=FB815
COMPOUND
:::::: : y.
SRRF20 IRRF53 IRRFQ0 1RRF120JRRF160! RRF J RSD
Phenol i
bis(2-Chloroethy1 )ether
2-Ch1oropheno1
1.3—Dichlorobenzene
1.4-Dichlorobenzene
3enzyl alcohol
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
2-Methy 1 pheno 1
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) ether
4-Methyl phenol
N-Ni troso-d i-n-propylamine
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Isophorone
2-Ni tnopheno 1
2,4-Dimethy1pheno1
Benzoic acid
bis < 2-Chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dic hi oropheno 1
1.2.4-Trichlorobenzcne
Naphthalene
4-Ch 1 oroan i 1 ine
Hexachlorobatadiene
4-Chl oro-3-me thy I pheno 1
2-Methy1naphtha1ene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,6-Trichioropheno1
2.4.5-Trichl orophenol
2-Ch 1 oronaphtha 1 ene
2-Ni troani 1 ine
Dimethylphthalate
Acenaphthylene
2,6-Dinitro toluene
3-Nitroani1ine
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
1.107!
1.109:
1.040:
1.369!
1.411!
0.494!
1.291!
C.B39!
1.495,'
0.557!
0.985!
0.500!
0.487!
0.622!
0.095!
0.254!
I
0.347!
0.175!
0.314!
0.973!
0.240!
0.1731
0.156!
0.631!
0.074!
0.202!
0.957!
I
0.891!
1.306!
0.1B4!
I
0.94Q1
1.156!
1.136!
1.151!
1.292!
1.400!
0.515!
1.239!
0.B77!
1.283!
0.7721
0.884!
0.511!
0.425!
0.602!
0.1221
0.262!
0.126!
0.352!
0.211!
0.290!
0.940!
0.3241
0.152!
0.1801
0.626!
0.085!
0.245!
0.305!
0.994!
0.3961
0.9351
1.419!
0.2131
0.196!
0.915!
0.197!
0.082!
1.5031
1.224!
1.27B1
1.450!
1.401.'
0.517!
1.326!
1.032!
1.783!
0.889!
1.064!
0.556!
0.536!
0.719!
0.137!
0.3041
0.114!
0.416!
0.257!
0.328!
1.039!
0.3741
0.179!
0.207!
0.745!
0.132!
0.299!
0.3721
1.030!
0.476.'
1.0791
1.601!
0.258!
0.225!
1.053!
0.3341
0.133!
1.498:
1.257!
1.304!
1.4441
1.510J
0.563!
1.355!
1.019!
1.6531
0.923!
1.038!
0.553!
0.478!
0.687!
0.138!
0.309!
0.112!
0.4051
0.267!
0.3191
1.019!
0.367!
0.1741
0.2061
0.737!
0.129!
0.301!
0.360!
1.055!
0.459!
1.083!
1.633!
0.272!
0.2031
1.062!
0.3581
0.119!
1.223:
1.079!
1.034!
1.1611
1.180:
0.471!
1.0951
0.872!
1.056!
0.794!
0.7751
0.445!
0.376!
0.5561
0.102!
0.263!
0.084!
0.344!
0.218!
0.2381
0.B24!
0.276!
0.1201
0.1741
0.601!
0.095:
0.2201
0.259!
0.823!
0.2981
0.791:
1.216!
0.179!
0.123!
0.7781
0.236!
0.0791
1.298J
1.1611
1.161!
1.343!
1.398!
0.512!
1.261!
0.928!
1.4541
0.787!
0.949!
0.5131
0.461!
0.6371
0.119!
0.279!
0.110!
0.373!
0.226!
0.298!
0.959!
0.316!
0.159!
0.1841
0.668!
0.1031
0.2541
0.324!
0.973!
0.408!
0.957!
1.435!
0.221:
0.1871
0.9511
0.282!
0.1031
14.0*
6.0!
10.01
8.0!
9.0*
6.0!
8.01
9.0!
19.0!
18.0!
12.0#
8.0!
13.0!
10.0!
16.0*
9.0!
17.0!
9.0!
16.0*
12.01
8.01
18.01
15.0*
11.0*
10.0!
25.0#
17.0*
16.0!
9.01
19.EI
13.0!
12.01
19.01
23.01
12.0*
27.0#
26.0#
FORM VI SV-1
D-108
-------
6C
SEMIVO-ATILE ORGWICS INITIAL CALIBRATION DATA
Lab Name:Triangle Labs, Inc. Con tract: 68-01-7407
Lab Code: TTRILAB Case No.: ***** SAS No.: ****** SOG No.: *****
Instrum^it ID: F
Calibration Date :07/06/90
07/06/90
Min RRF -for SPCC<#> * 0.050
Max 7.RSD "for CCC<*> = 30.0V.
LAB FILE ID; 5
RF5F80 =^B81502
RRF20 =FB81503
RRF 120=FB81501
RRF50 =FB81504
RRF160=FB815
COMPOUND
Dibenzo-furan
2,4-Dini trotoluene
Diethylphtha1ate
4-Chlonophenyl-phenylether
rluorene
4-Nitroanil ine
4,6-Din i tro-2-me thy 1 pheno 1
V-NitrosodiphenylarnineC (1 >
4-Bromopheny 1 -pheny lether
He x ac h I oroben z ene
Pentachloropheno1
RRF20 SRRF50 1RRF80 !RRF120!RRF160! RRF
7.
RSD
1.3221
0.207:
0.772:
0.479:
1.055J
523:
126!
1291
Phenan threne
l
1
1.133!
An thracene
•
t
0.920!
Di-n—butyl phthalate
•
l
0.724!
Fluoranthene
*
0.713!
Pyrene
3.6121
Butyl benzylphthalate
0.8791
3,3'-Dichlonobenzidine
0.156!
3enzo(a)anthracene
j
0.599!
Chrysene
J
1.545:
bis(2-Ethy1hexy1)phthalate
5
0.709:
Di-n-oc ty1phthalate
*
0.758!
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
¦
1
0.3191
Benzo (k) -f luoran thene
1
1.1371
Benzo < a) pyrene
X
1.372!
tndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
J
0.491!
Dibenz(a,h) an thracene
j
0.394!
Benzo(g,h,i)pery lene
•
0.8481
1•373«
0.270:
0.B09:
0.441:
1.069:
0.235:
0.027!
0.519:
0.127!
0.140!
0.028!
1.049!
0.798!
0.787'.
0.851!
2.631!
1.021:
0.191!
0.572!
1.3531
0.496:
0.971:
0.8I8:
1.676!
1.4191
0.578!
0.630!
1.070!
1.487!
0.335!
0.951!
0.482!
1.2231
0.232:
0.0461
0.525!
0.145!
0.1591
0.034!
1.109!
0.769!
1.111!
1.016!
3.983!
1.756!
0.2911
0.893!
1.430:
1.242!
0.989!
0.9491
2.4021
1.8361
0.332!
0.480!
0.8831
1.510:
0.324!
0.952!
0.466!
1.2071
0.205:
0.0451
0.5521
0.156!
0.1761
0.038!
1.118!
0.725!
1.1491
0.970!
3.086!
1.536!
0.325!
0.959!
1.331:
1.115;
0.889!
0.9961
2.044!
1.3681
0.341!
0.605!
0.9451
1.149:
0.217!
0.603!
0.3491
0.842!
0.146.'
0.0401
0.4181
0.110:
0.142!
0.0291
0.811!
0.540!
0.9201
0.864!
1.946!
0.989!
0.2481
0.841!
1.052:
0.B001
0.877!
0.896:
1.324:
0.8931
0.490:
0.708!
0.937:
1.368:
0.271:
0.817!
0.4441
1.079!
0.205!
0.039!
0.507!
0.133!
0.149!
0.0321
1.044!
0.7501
0.9381
0.883!
3.052!
1.236!
0.2421
0.777J
1.344;
0.872!
0.8971
0.7961
1.716!
1.378!
0.447!
0.564!
0.937!
10.0!
21.0!
17.0!
12.0!
14.01
20.0:
22.01
10.0*
13.0:
12.0!
13.0*
12.0!
18.0!
20.01
13.0*
26.0!
31.01
28.01
22.0!
13.0:
34.0!
10.0*
34.0!
30.0:
24.0*
23.0!
22.0!
9.0!
2-Fluoropheno 1
Phenol-d5
Ni troben zene-dS
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2,4,6-Tribromopheno1
Terphenyl-dl4
0.484! 0.5721 0.768! 0.772! 0.646! 0.649! 19.0!
0.786: 0.B31J
0.231! 0.2241
0.599! 0.600!
0.0171 0.0241
0.5641 0.4671
0.998!
0.2771
0.630!
0.0291
0.865:
0.975:
0.2691
0.619!
0.029!
0.776J
0.3411
0.193!
0.490!
0.0231
0.543!
0.836! 10.0:
0.2391 14.01
0.5881 9.01
0.024! 19.0:
0.643! 26.02
<1) Cannot be separated from DiphGnylamine
FORM VI SV-2
D-109
-------
CASE NARRATIVE
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.
801-10 Capitola Drive
Research Triangle Park, NC 27713
(919)-544-5729
DATE: June 29, 1990
CLIENT P.O. NO: 3808 T-7
TLI NO: 1£916
OBJECTIVE: Analysis of VOST tubes for a specified list of
volati1e compounds.
METHOD:
The VOST tubes were analyzed according to Method 5040 from
the EPA SOW-846. The internal standards bromochloromethane,
1,4-di f1uorobenzene and
chlorobenzene-dc were added in
the
The
amount of 0.25 ug immediately prior to analysis by GC/MS.
surrogate standards, toluene-dg and benzene-dg were added in the
amount of 0.15 ug immediately prior to analysis by GC/MS.
The GC/MS analysis conditions are listed below:
Purge and trap:
Purge:
Desorb Temperature:
Desorb Time:
Tekmar
11 mi n
180 C
4 mi n.
LSC-2000
GC:
Column:
Program:
30 m x ,52mm DB624
0 C hold 4 min to 105 C
at 6 C/min
MS:
Scan:
Source Temperature
Interface:
35-260 amu at 0.55 s/scan
180 C
Jet Separator, 190 C
REPORT:
Enclosed with the case narrative are the chain of custody,
sample log-in sheets and instrument work sheets and log pages.
The data are reported as quantitation reports, chromato-
grams, interim reports, and spectra of detected compounds. The
quantitation report header gives the sample and calibration
injection ID, as 'data file' and 'RF file' respectively. The
sample name, dilution factor, TLI project number, date of report,
D-110
-------
CASE NARRATIVE
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.
801-10 Capitola Drive
Research Triangle Park, NC 27713
(919)-544-5729
and analysis date are also listed in the quantitation report
header. The raw areas and scan numbers found on the quantitation
report are from the interim report. The response factors used
are the average response factors from the initial calibration.
All initfal and continuing calibration data is located in the
back of the data package. The ISID is the internal standard
identifier. Those compounds matched to 1 f4-dif1uorobenzene, for
example, are flagged with the ISID number 14. The amounts for
the target compounds are reported in ug. The sample calculations
are listed below. If the target compound is detected, a code of
*D* is reported. If the target compound is detected but below
the quantitation limit, a code of 'E' or estimated is reported.
If the target compound is not detected, a code of *ND' is or not
detected is reported. Amounts reported for target compounds that
are not detected are calculated using an area of 20 counts.
Compounds flagged with the code 'IS7 are internal standards.
RESULTS:
All VOST tubes were run in pairs as indicated on the Entropy
REQUEST FOR ANALYSIS sheet.
The recoveries for all surrogates were normal in the two
laboratory blanks and in the three FIELD BLANKs associated with
these VOST samples. The surrogate recoveries varied greatly in
the VOST samples, mainly due to the extremely high levels of
target compounds. Several samples had no reported recovery of
1 ,2-dichloroethane-d4. This surrogate was lost due to the large
amount of methylene chloride in the samples. Elevated levels of
the surrogates toluene-dg and benzene-dg are due to large amounts
of the unlabeled compounds present in the samples.
In sample 7A/1 there no bromochloromethane found. This
internal standard was most likely lost in the large methylene
chloride peak that eluted in the same time window as the analyte.
All detected analytes in the sample that are normally quantitated
against bromochloromethane were instead quantitated against 1,4-
difluorobenzene. The response factors for these analytes are
listed on a chart enclosed in the case narrative packet which is
on top of the complete data package.
Samples 7A/1, 7A/2, 7A/3, 78/1, 7B/2, 7B/3, 7C/1, 7C/2, and
7C/3 contained benzene and toluene at levels which gave saturated
spectra (i.e. a 10 V signal) for these compounds. A secondary
ion of each was used for quantitation in order to better estimate
the true amount of these compounds present in the sample. Ben-
zene was quantitated on the m/z = 50 ion. Toluene was quantitat-
2
D-lll
-------
CASE NARRATIVE
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.
801-10 Capitola Drive
Research Triangle Park, NC 27713
(919)-544-5729
ed on the m/z = 65 ion. The calibration data for these secondary
ions is included with the initial calibration data for the analy-
sis. The ion used for quantitation is indicated on the quantita-
tion report.
All samples, except for the FIELD BLANKS, contained one or
more analytes at levels higher than the 0.1 to 1.0 microgram
range of the analysis. All amounts listed on the quantitation
reports that exceed 1.0 microgram should be considered estimated,
not absolute, values.
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
response factor = (area analyte ccal) * (amt IS ccal)
(area IS ccal) ~ (amt analyte ccal)
(area analyte in sample) * (amt IS)
(area IS in sample) * (RF)
ccal = continuing calibration
IS = internal standard
amt IS ccal = amount of internal standard in the ccal = 0.25 ug
amt analyte ccal = amount of analyte in the ccal = 0.25 ug
amt IS = amount of internal standard added to the sample =0.25 ug
RF= the average response factor from the initial calibration
^Valerie Evans Pennyflsrock Nancy Bragg
Laboratory Manager QA/QC Officer Report Generation Manager
Amount in ug:
amount of analyte =
3
D-112.
-------
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.
601*10 Capltola Drive
Research Triangle Park, NC 27713
Telephone: (919) 544-5729
FILE NAMEJHB474 SAMPLE ID 7A/FB
RF FILE: VQST0611
OATE: 06/20/90
ANALYSIS DATE: 06/11/90
TLI Project Number:15916
QUANTITATION REPORT VOST METHOD 5040
NAME
AREA
RF
SCAN
ISID
AMOUNT, ug
CODE
QUAN LIMIT
1
Broaochl orooathane
1165
711
IS
2
Acrylonitri la
0
.3190
0
.013
ND
.05
4
Vinyl Chloride
0
1.1440
0
.004
ND
.05
6
Methylene Chloride
3033
1.5770
370
.413
0
.05
12
Chlorofora
0
3.4590
0
1
.001
ND
.05
13
1,2-Dichloroathant
0
2.1960
0
1
.002
ND
.05
14
1,4-Oifluorobenzane
6342
934
14
13
16
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
269
.4890
755
14
.022
E
.05
17
Carbon Tetrachloride
0
.4650
0
14
.002
ND
.05
22
Trich1oroethene
414
.3930
966
14
.042
E
.05
25
Benzene
3778
1.0780
827
14
.138
D
.05
28
(Ch1orodenzene-d5
5351
1483
28
19
31
Tetrachloroethene
0
.3440
0
28
.003
NO
.05
33
Toluene
3966
.6240
1215
26
.297
0
.05
34
Chlorobenzene
0
.7820
0
2B
.001
ND
.05
35
Ethylbenzene
0
.4090
0
28
.002
NO
.05
SURROGATE SUMMARY
AREA
RF SCAN ISID AMOUNT
CODE X RECOVERY
39 To1uene*d8
41 1,2-Dich1oroethar»e-d4
48 Benzerte-d6
4265 1.0550
1471 2.2600
4921 1.1240
1203
629
621
26
1
14
.169 D
.140 D
.173 0
125.9
93.1
115.1
D-113
-------
Triangle Laboratortee, Inc.
801-10 Capltola Drive
Reaaarch Triangle Park, NC 27713
Talaphone; (919) 544-5729
QUAMTITATION REPORT VOST METXOO 5040
FILE NAME:H8475 SAMPLE 10 7/2/FB
RF FILE: V0ST0611
DATE: 06/20/90
AHALYSI8 DATE: 06/11/90
TLI Project NuMb«r:l59l6
NAME AREA RF SCAN ISID AMOUNT, ug CODE QUAN LIMIT
1
Broaoch^oronathane
108B
711
1
IS
2
Acrylonitme
0
.3190
0
1
.014
NO
.05
4
Vinyl Chlorloe
0
1.1440
0
1
.004
NO
.05
6
Mathylana Chloride
1521
1.5770
370
1
.222
D
.05
12
Chloroform
0
3.4590
0
1
.001
NO
.05
13
1,2-D1ch1oroethane
0
2.1960
0
1
.002
NO
.05
14
1,4-Oifluorobanzana
6482
934
14
IS
16
1 ,1,1 -Tr 1chloroethane
0
.4690
0
14
.002
ND
.05
17
Carbon Tetrachloride
0
. 4650
0
14
.002
NO
.05
22
Trlchloroethene
327
.3930
965
14
.032
E
.05
25
Banzene
0
1.0760
0
14
.001
ND
.05
28
Ch1orobanzana-d5
4799
1482
28
IS
91
Tetrachloroethene
0
.3440
0
28
.003
ND
.05
33
Toluene
2433
.6240
1215
28
.203
D
.05
34
Chlorobenzerte
0
.7620
0
28
.001
ND
.05
35
Ethylbenzene
0
.4090
0
28
.003
NO
.05
c8sssisuiiisni3iss:::c:KB:£::B:3::sssn::::38:e::s::u3nBiisiissBssss:B::s3tBsi::::s:::s:istiii8:::::
SURROGATE SUMMARY AREA RF SCAN ISID AMOUNT CODE X RECOVERY
39
Toluene-aa
4389
1.0550
1203
28
.217
D
144.5
41
1,2-D1ch1oroethane-d4
1424
2.2600
829
1
.145
D
96.5
48
Benzerte-d6
4640
1.1240
821
14
.159
0
106. 1
D-114
-------
Trlangl® Laboratories, Inc.
601-10 Capitol* DrW«
RftsMrch Trlangl* Park, NC
Ta1«phor»: (919) 544-5729
PILE NAME:HB476 SAMPLE ID 7/3/PB
RF FILE: V0ST0611
27713 DATE: 06/20/90
ANALYSIS DATE: 06/11/90
TLI Project Nuat>«r:159l0
QUANTITATION REPORT V03T METHOD 5040
NAME
AREA
RF
SCAN
ISIO
AMOUNT, ug
CODE
QUAN LIMIT
1 Bronochloromethana
662
712
IS
2 Acrylonltri !•
0
.3190
0
.016
NO
.05
4 Vinyl Chloricto
0
1.1440
0
1
.005
ND
.05
6 Methylene Chlorite
318
1.5770
371
1
.058
0
.05
12 Chloroform
0
3.4590
0
.002
NO
.05
13 1,2-Oichloroathane
0
2.1960
0
1
.003
ND
.05
14 1,4-D«n2an«-d5
4022
1484
28
IS
31 Tetrachloroethene
0
.3440
0
26
.004
NO
.05
33 Toluene
309
.6240
1216
28
.031
E
.05
34 Ch1orot>*n2ene
0
.7820
0
28
.002
ND
.05
35 Ethylbanzen*
0
.4090
0
28
.003
NO
.05
SURROGATE SUMMARY
AREA
RF
SCAN
ISID
AMOUNT
COOE
X RECOVERY
39 To1iMrx-d8 3459
41 1,2-DiCh1oro*th*n«-d4 1122
48 B*nzene-dS 3332
1.0550
1205
28
.204
D
135.9
2.2600
629
1
.144
0
96.0
1.1240
821
14
. 150
D
99.9
D-U5
-------
Tri*ngl« Laboratories, Inc. FILE NAME:HB471 SAMPLE ID VOSTBLK 061190
801-10 Capitol* Drive RF FILE: V03T0611
Research Triangle Park, NO 27713 DATE: 06/20/90
Telephone: (918) 544-5729 ANALYSIS DATE: 06/11/90
TLI Project Numoer:15916
QUANTITATION REPORT VOST METHOD 5040
tizstse3i3ei::::ns:::2SBtss::::83sisB:r:3:::s3siis::::se3sii::::;sss:s!::isssssssss::::::ss;s::sss3:::
NAME AREA RF SCAN ISID AMOUNT, us CODE QUAN LIMIT
1 Broaochloronetftane
1380
711
1
IS
2 AcrylonltM !•
0
.3190
0
1
.011
ND
.05
4 Vinyl Chloride
0
1.1440
0
1
.003
ND
.05
6 Methylene Chloride
0
1.5770
0
1
.002
ND
.05
12 Chloroforw
0
3.4590
0
1
.001
NO
.05
13 1 ,2-Dichloroethane
0
2.1960
0
1
.002
ND
.05
14 1,4-Difluorobenzene
7070
934
14
IS
16 1,1,1-Trlchloroethane
0
.4890
0
14
.001
NO
.05
17 Carbon Tetrachloride
0
.4650
0
14
.002
NO
.05
22 Trlchloroetbene
0
.3930
0
14
.002
ND
.05
25 Benzene
0
1.0780
0
14
.001
ND
.05
26 Ch1orot>enzene-d5
6668
1481
26
IS
31 Tetrachloroethene
0
.3440
0
26
.002
ND
.05
33 Toluene
154
.6240
1215
26
.009
E
.05
34 Chlorobenzene
0
.7820
0
26
.001
ND
.05
35 Ethylbenzene
74
.4090
1522
28
.007
E
.05
SURROGATE SUMMARY AREA RF SCAN ISID AMOUNT CODE X RECOVERY
39
Toluene-dS
5355
1.0550
1202
28
. 190
0
126.9
41
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
1538
2.2600
629
1
. 123
D
82.2
48
5enzene-d6
5105
1.1240
820
14
.161
D
107.1
D-116
-------
Triangl* Laboratories, Inc.
801*10 Capltola Drive
Research Triangle Park, NC 27713
Telephone: (919) 544-5729
FILE NAME: H8485 SAMPLE ID VOSTBLK 061290
RF FILE: V03T0611
DATE: 06/20/90
ANALYSIS DATE: 06/11/90
TLI Project Number:15916
QUANTITATION REPORT VOST METHOD 5040
NAME AREA RF SCAN ISID AMOUNT, ug CODE GUAN LIMIT
1
Broeoch 1 oroaethane
1069
707
1
IS
2
Acrylonitrile
0
.3190
0
1
.015
NO
.05
4
Vinyl Chloride
0
1.1440
0
1
T
O
o
NO
.05
6
Methylene Chloride
0
1.5770
0
1
.003
NO
.05
12
Crtlorofonn
0
3.4590
0
1
.001
NO
.05
13
1,2-0ich1oroethane
0
2.1960
0
1
.002
NO
.05
14
1,4-Difluorobanzene
5318
930
14
IS
16
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
0
.4890
0
14
.002
ND
.05
17
Carbon Tetrachloride
0
.4650
0
14
.002
ND
.05
22
Trichloroethene
0
.3930
0
14
.002
ND
.05
25
Benzene
0
1.0780
0
1 4
.001
ND
.05
26
,Chlorot»enzene-d5
5336
1478
28
IS
31
Tetrachloroethene
0
.3440
0
28
.003
ND
.05
33
Toluene
0
.6240
0
28
.002
ND
.05
34
Chlorobenzene
0
.7820
0
28
. 001
NO
.05
35
Ethylbenzene
0
.4090
0
28
.002
ND
.05
esssssss====s:ssssssssB:s:sssssssssss=s::::sssspssas;
SURROGATE SUMMARY AREA RF SCAN ISID AMOUNT CODE X RECOVERY
39 Toluene-d8 46*4 1.0550
41 1,2-0ich1oroethane-d4 1320 2.2B00
48 Benzene-d6 3776 1.1240
199
28
. 206
D
137.5
625
1
. 137
D
91 . 1
816
14
. 158
D
105.3
D-117
-------
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.
601-10 Caoltola Orlve
Research Triangle Park, MC 27713
Telephone: (919) 5*4-5729
FILE NAME:HB477 SAMPLE 10 7A/1
RF FILE: V03T0611
DATE: 08/20/90
ANALYSIS DATE: 08/11/90
TLI Project Number:15916
OUANTITATION REPORT VOST HETHOO 5040
NAME AREA RF SCAN ISID AMOUNT, ug COOE OUAN LIMIT
1
Broeochloroeethane
906
719
1
IS
2
Acrylonltrl1e
47572
.3190
459
1
41.166
D
.05
4
Vinyl Chloride
0
1.1440
0
1
.005
NO
.05
6
Methylene Chloride
11733
1.6770
381
1
2.054
D
.05
12
Chlorofor*
7419
3.4590
759
1
.592
D
.05
13
1,2-D1cMoroethane
0
2.1960
0
1
.003
ND
.05
14
1,4-D1fluoro6enzene
0
0
14
IS
16
1,1,1-Trlchloroethane
0
2.9150
0
M
O
o
ND
.05
17
C«rbori Tetrachloride
0
2.7890
0
1
.002
ND
.05
22
T r 1 chl oroethene
0
2.3470
0
1
.002
ND
.05
25
fien2er» («/z r SO) v« IS *1
1554992
1.0678
652
1
401.912
D
.05
20
Chlorobenzer>e-d5
2137
1486
28
IS
31
TetracM oroethene
95
.3440
1321
28
.032
E
.05
33
Toluene (m/z - 65)
132261
.1430
1235
28
108.201
D
.05
34
Chlorobenzene
156
.7620
1490
28
.023
E
.05
35
Ethylbenzene
244
.4090
1526
26
.070
D
.05
EROQ ATE SUMMARY
AREA
RF
SCAN
ISID
AMOUNT
COOE
% RECOVER
39
j
i
i ?
: ?
! 5
1 o
1 »-
2812
1.0550
1216 28
.467
D
311.0
41
1 ,Z-D1ch"loroethane-d4
0
2.2600
0
1
.000
ND
.0
48
8anzer>e-d6
123223
6.6440
932
1
5.118
D
3411.8
D-118
-------
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.
601-10 Capltola Drive
Research Triangle Park, NC 27713
Telephone: (919) 544-5729
FILE NAME:HB478 SAMPLE 10 7B/1
RF FILE: V03T0611
DATE: 06/20/90
ANALYSIS DATE: 06/11/80
TLI Project Nvjit>er: 15916
QUANTITATION REPORT VOST METHOD 5040
NAME AREA RF SCAN ISID AMOUNT* ug CODE 00AN LIMIT
1
Bro«ochlor
-------
Trlangl# LAborator->«s, Inc.
801-10 C*p1tola Dr1v«
R«Mtrch Tr1an9l« Park, NC 27713
T«1«phona: (919) 544-5729
FILE NAME:HB479 SAMPLE ZD 7C/1
RF FILE: V03T0811
DATE: 06/20/90
ANALYSIS DATE: 06/11/90
TLI Project Nuab«r:15916
QUANTITATION REPORT VOST METHOD 5040
NAME AREA RF SCAN ISIO AMOUNT, ug CODE OUAN LIMIT
1
Bro*ochlorom«than«
757
719
1
IS
2
AcryloMtrll#
26964
.3190
460
1
27.909
0
.05
4
Vinyl Chlorid*
0
1.1440
0
1
.006
NO
.05
6
M«thy1*r* Chlorite
4087
1.5770
379
1
.856
D
.05
12
Chloroform
8571
3.4590
757
1
.818
D
.05
13
1,2-D1chloroathan«
0
2.1960
0
1
.003
ND
.05
14
1,4-D1fluorob*n2«n«
4119
943
14
IS
16
1.1.1-Tr1eh1oro«than«
5960
.4890
764
14
.740
0
.05
17
Carbon Tatr*ch1or1d«
0
.4650
0
14
.003
ND
.05
22
Tr4ch1oro*th«n«
4665
.3930
973
14
.720
D
.05
25
B«nz*rM (a/z = 50)
407490
. 1800
856
14
137.402
D
.05
28
CMorob«nz«n«-d5
4687
1490
28
IS
31
T«tr*ch1oro*th*n«
4094
.3440
1325
28
.835
D
.05
33
Toluar* (n/z = 65)
477789
.1430
1246
28
178.215
D
.05
34
Ch1orob«nztn«
23526
.7820
1494
28
1.605
0
.05
35
Ethy1b*nz«n«
55473
.4090
1532
28
7.234
D
.05
SURROGATE SUMMARY
AREA
RF SCAN ISIO
AMOUNT
CODE * RECOVERY
39 To1uerw~d8
41 1,2-D1chloroethane-d4
46 B*nz«n«-d6
5398
0
28874
1.0550
2.2600
1.1240
1222
0
879
28
1
14
.273 D
.000 ND
1.559 D
161.9
.0
1039.4
D-120
«
-------
TrHan9l* Laboratory**, Inc.
601-10 Capitol* DrW*
Research Tr1ang1a Park, NC 27713
Talaphorw: (919) 544-5729
FILE NAME:H8480 SAMPLE 10 7A/2
RP FILE: V0ST0811
DATE: 06/20/90
ANALYSIS DATE: 06/11/90
TLI Project Nuabar:1S916
QUANTITATION REPORT VOST METHOD 5040
r::::::::::tc3:::::3::::2sss8:3B::tsai
NAME
1 Bronoch toroomthana
2 AcrylonHrl 1#
4 Vinyl Chlorlda
6 Mathylan# Chloric*
12 CMorofor*
13 1,2-Dichloro«thana
14 1,4-D1f luorobanzana
16 1,1,1-Trlchloroathana
17 Carbon Tetrachloride
22 TMchloroathana
25 Banzana (m/z c 50)
AREA RF SCAN ISI0 AMOUNT, ug CODE QUAN LIMIT
1038
721 1
IS
31524
.3190
460 1
23.804
D
.05
20338
1.1440
100 1
4.282
D
.05
1986
1.5770
377 1
.303
D
.05
8536
3.4590
759 1
.594
D
.05
0
2.1960
0 1
.002
ND
.05
5164
943 14
IS
5294
.4890
766 14
.524
0
.05
0
.4650
0 14
.002
ND
.05
4B94
.3930
974 14
.603
D
.05
345979
. 1800
653 14
93.053
0
.05
28
Ch1orot>anz«na-d5
4376
1489
28
IS
31
Tatrachloroatharva
4457
.3440
1322
26
.740
0
.05
33
Toluana (n/z s 65)
192192
.1430
1234
28
76.782
0
.05
34
Chlorobanzana
11302
.7820
1493
26
.826
0
.05
35
Ethylbenzena
6996
.4090
1529
28
,977
D
.05
£:s3:cKss:es::s:3S3c:ssssxsi8isBssi£i::sitBis3i3S8s:eB::e:s:3::::::B:::::::::3c:::siiBS3SBSsissxs:s:ss
SURROGATE SUMMARY AREA RF SCAN ISID AMOUNT CODE X RECOVERY
39
To1uen«-d8
5213
1.0550
1218
26
.262
D
166.2
41
1,2-D1ch1oro«thana~d4
0
2.2600
0
1
.000
ND
.0
48
Banzene-dB
14986
1.1240
679
14
.645
D
430.3
D-121
-------
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.
801-10 Capitola Drive
Research Triangle Park, NC 27713
Telephone: (919) 544-5729
FILE NAME:HB488 SAMPLE ID 7B/2
RF FILE: V03T0611
OATE: 06/20/90
ANALYSIS OATE: 06/11/90
TLI Project Nueber:15916
QUANTITATION REPORT VOST METHOD 5040
ete88t£:s8:::ttiis2:::::EaBii««isaa!:et:::iisssi«s:s::::::s:::eBB8siBia8r:Bes:i«3:sBtE::::::::::::xrs8:
NAME AREA RF SCAN ISID AMOUNT, ug CODE QUAN LIMIT
1
Bromoch lb rose thane
1096
718
1
IS
2
Acrylonltrlle
25679
.3190
454
1
18.357
D
.05
4
Vinyl Chloride
0
1.1440
0
1
.004
NO
.05
6
Methylene Chloride
1031
1.5770
376
1
.149
D
.05
12
Chlorofom
7210
3.4590
756
1
.475
0
.05
13
1,2-Dichloro«thane
0
2.1960
0
1
.002
NO
.05
14
1,4-Oifluorobenzene
4859
939
14
IS
16
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
3974
.4690
763
14
.418
0
.05
17
Carbon Tetrachloride
0
.4850
0
14
.002
ND
.05
22
Tr i chl oroethene
4400
.3930
970
14
.578
0
.05
25
Benzene («/z e 50)
334658
.1800
653
14
95.659
0
.05
28
Chlorobenzene-d5
5024
1483
28
IS
31
Tetrachloroethene
5161
.3440
1318
28
.749
0
.05
33
Toluene («/z s 65)
2791EB
.1430
1234
28
97.151
0
.05
34
Chlorobenzene
43610
.7820
1489
28
2.775
D
.05
35
Ethylbenzene
32308
.4090
1525
28
3.930
D
.05
SURROGATE SUMMARY
AREA
RF SCAN ISIO AMOUNT
CODE X RECOVERY
39 To1uene-d8
41 1,2-Di ch1oro«th*rxi-d4
48 Benzene-*d6
5623
0
23489
1.0550
2.2600
1.1240
1214
0
877
28
1
14
.265 D
.000 NO
1.075 0
176.8
. 0
716.6
D-122
-------
Trlangla Laboratortaa, Inc.
801-10 Capltola Drlva
Raaaarcft Trlangla Park, NC
Talaphona: (919) 544-5729
FILE NAME:HB487 SAMPLE 10 7C/2
RF PILE: V03T0611
27713 DATE: 06/20/90
ANALYSIS DATE: 06/11/90
TLI Projact Nusbar:15916
QUANTITATION REPORT VOST METHOD 5040
NAME
AREA
RF
SCAN ISID AMOUNT, ug COOE QUAN LIMIT
1 BroflocMoroeetharw
2 AcrylonltrUa
4 Vinyl CMorlda
6 Mathylana Chlorida
12 Chloroform
13 1,2-Dichloroathana
1199
717
1
IS
34767
.3190
459
1
22.722
0
.05
22771
1.1440
100
1
4.150
D
.05
3715
1.5770
376
1
.491
0
.05
5360
3.4590
755
1
.323
0
.05
0
2.1960
0
1
.002
NO
.05
14 1,4-Oifluorobaruana 5156
16 1,1,1-Trlchloroatharva 3548
17 Carton Tatrachlorioa 0
22 Trlchloroathana 3420
25 Sanzana (a/z = 50) 401908
940
14
18
4890
763
14
.352
D
.05
4650
0
14
.002
NO
.05
3930
969
14
.422
0
.05
1800
860
14
106.263
D
.05
28
Chlorobanzana-d5
5270
1484
28
IS
31
Tatraehloroathena
3486
.3440
1317
28
.481
D
.05
33
Toluaoa (a/z s 65)
128122
.1430
1227
28
42.503
0
.05
34
CMorobarizana
16633
.7820
1489
28
1.009
D
.05
35
Ethylbanzarta
10665
.4090
1524
28
1.237
D
.05
ZSZ3ZaZZXB8a8S8ZSS88S38SS3SZSSeeSSSa8Z9ZZS3ZS3ZZSSZ8Z38ZZ88BZZZ8S3ZZ8SSZZ33Za83ZZSZZZZ3ZBZZZS888S38ZSCS
SURROGATE SUMMARY AREA RF SCAN ISID AMOUNT COOE X RECOVERY
39 To1uana-d8 4921 1.0550 1208 28 .221 D 147.5
41 1,2-DicMoroathane-<14 2428 2.2600 859 1 .224 D 149.3
46 Banzana-d6 26224 1.1240 878 14 1.131 0 754.2
D-123
-------
TMangla Laboratory*, Inc.
601-10 Capltola 0rlva
Raaaarcfi Trlangla Park, NC 27713
Talaphona: (919) 544-5729
FILE NAME:H8490 SAMPLE 10 7C/3
RF FILE: V03T0811
DATE: 05/20/80
ANALYSIS DATE: 00/11/90
TLI Project NuaOar:15916
QUANTITATION REPORT VOST METH00 5040
NAME
;S:SSSSSS£88(3I8XSKSSrS8
AREA
RF
.SSKZS33S
SCAN IS
issEcrseissssssssss:
D AMOUNT, ug CODE
OOAN LIMIT
1
Broaochloroaathana
1046
716
IS
2
Acrylon1tr1la
20461
.3190
454
15.325
0
.05
4
Vinyl Chloric*
0
1.1440
0
.004
NO
.05
6
Mathy1*r>a Chlorida
2113
1.5770
373
.320
D
.05
12
Chlorofora
7141
3.4590
754
.493
0
.05
13
1,2-D1ch1oroathana
0
2.1960
0
.002
NO
.05
14
1 ,4-01f1uorobanzarta
4050
936
1
IS
10
1,1,1-Tr1chloroathana
3173
.4690
761
1
.401
0
.05
17
Carbon T*trach1or14a
0
.4650
0
1
.003
NO
.05
22
Trlchloroathana
3411
.3930
909
1
.536
D
.05
25
Ban2ana (a/2 & 50)
160368
.1600
643
1
61.855
0
.05
28
Ch1orobanzana-d5
4359
1485
28
IS
31
Tatrachloroathana
4328
.3440
1318
28
.721
D
.05
33
Toluana (m/z = 65)
186366
.1430
1230
28
74.745
0
.05
34
Chlorobanzana
18655
.7820
1490
28
1.368
0
.05
35
Ethylbanzana
12987
.4090
1526
28
1.821
0
.05
:s3siii8EBEss8:xtie8t93iiiucsss8teess::ss:ssseescsis::se:!see:!s::::
SURROGATE SUMMARY AREA RF SCAN ISI0 AMOUNT CODE X RECOVERY
39 Toluarw-dS
41 1,2-Dich1oroathana-d4
48 B«nz0n«-d6
2539 1.0550 1212 28
3040 2.2600 845 1
8808 1.1240 872 14
143
D
95.6
321
0
214.3
484
D
322.5
D-I24
-------
TMangl# Laboratories, Inc.
BOi-10 Capttola Orlva
R«M«rch Triangle Park, NC 27713
Talaphon#: (919) 544-5729
FILE NAME:H8489 SAMPLE ID 7B/S
RF FILE: V03T0611
DATE: 06/21/90
ANALYSIS DATE: 06/11/90
TLI Project Nuat>*r: 15918
QUANTITATION REPORT VOST METHOD 5040
NAME
AREA
RF
SCAN
I3ID
AMOUNT, ug
CODE
QUAN LIMIT
1 8rococh1oroft«than«
1034
714
1
IS
2 AerylonltrO#
14402
.3180
453
1
10.915
D
.05
4 Vinyl ChloHde
15359
1.1440
101
1
3.246
D
.05
8 M»thy1«r>« Chloride
1856
1.5770
373
1
.285
D
.05
12 Chlorofom
7193
3.4590
752
1
.503
D
.05
13 1,2-Dichloroathar*
0
2.1980
0
1
.002
ND
.05
14 1,4-D1f1uorob«nz«na
5089
936
14
IS
16 1,1,1-Trich1oro#th«r>«
0
.4890
0
14
,002
ND
.05
17 Carbon Tetrachloride
0
.4050
0
14
.002
ND
.05
22 Tr4chlor*oethen»
4101
.3930
968
14
.513
D
.05
25 Benzene (n/z = 50)
186276
.1800
841
14
45.380
D
.05
28 Ch1orob*nz#n«-d5
4826
1484
28
IS
31 Tetrachloroethon*
4482
.3440
1317
28
.675
D
.05
33 Toluene (m/z s 85}
152491
.1430
1227
28
55.218
D
.05
34 Chlorobenzerte
11475
.7820
1489
28
.760
D
.05
35 Ethylbenzene
7136
.4090
1525
28
.903
D
.05
SURROGATE SUMMARY
AREA
RF
SCAN
ISID
AMOUNT
CODE
X RECOVERY
39 Tolu«r)*~d8
41 1,2-0ich1oro«thana-d4
48 B»nz«ne-d6
3032 1.0550
2568 2.2600
8092 1.1240
1208
843
871
28
1
14
.149 0
.275 0
.354 D
99.2
183.2
235.8
D-125
-------
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.
601-10 Capltola Drive
fttmrch Triangle Park, NC 27713
Telephone: (919) 544-5729
FILE NAME:H6486 SAMPLE Z0 7A/3
RF FILE: VOST0611
DATE: 06/20/90
ANALYSIS DATE: 06/11/90
TLX Project Number:15916
QUANTITATION REPORT V03T METHOD 5040
5SX8SI3SS
NAME
AREA
RF
SCAN
ISIO
AMOUNT, ug
CODE
QUAN LIMIT
1
Broaochloroeethane
1287
716
1
IS
2
AcrylonltrUe
20695
.3190
455
1
12.599
D
.05
4
Vinyl Chloride
0
1.1440
0
1
.003
ND
.05
6
Methylene Chloride
2025
1.5770
375
1
.249
D
.05
12
Chlorofora
7486
3.4590
754
1
.420
D
.05
13
1 »2-Dichloroethane
0
2.1960
0
1
.002
ND
.05
14
1,4-D1fluorobenzene
5489
939
14
IS
16
1,1,1-Trichloroetharve
0
.4890
0
14
.002
ND
.05
17
Carbon Tetrachloride
0
.4650
0
14
.002
ND
.05
22
Tr1chloroethene
2903
.3930
969
14
.336
D
.05
CM
Benzene («/z = 50)
4159S8
. 1800
858
14
105.261
D
.05
26
Chlorobenzene-d5
5306
1464
26
IS
31
Tetrachloroethene
3391
.3440
1317
28
.464
D
.05
33
Toluene («/z = 65)
61783
.1430
1222
28
20.349
D
.05
34
Chlorobanzene
14852
.7820
1469
28
.894
D
.05
35
Ethylbenzene
5085
.4090
1525
28
.586
0
.05
:s33isisb::3::::s::::::::::b::xs3ss:::c3i:sssssbi
SURROGATE SUMMARY AREA RF SCAN ISXD AMOUNT CODE X RECOVERY
39 Toluene-dB 4668 1.0550 1206 28 .208 0 138.9
41 1,2-D1Ch1oroethane-d4 2446 2.2600 856 1 .210 0 140.2
48 Benzene-d6 23411 1.1240 878 14 .949 D 632.4
D-126
-------
Appendix E
CEM Data
Calibrations/One-min
E-la
-------
CALIBRATION SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineracr
REASON: Second system cal - 5/30/90
DATE : 05-30-1990 TIME: 18:51 - 19:05
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
MONITOR
RESPONSE
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
ppm CO
ppm CO
7. 02
"/. 02
0.0
181.2
0. 0
1263.0
0.00
12.50
7.8
1288.2
0. 1 4
12.48
E-lb
-------
O I BRAT X ON SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor
REASON: Repeat of Direct cal of stack analysers
DATE : 05—30-1990 TIME: 19:05 - 19:21
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
MONITOR
RESPONSE
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
ppmTKC
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
ppm CO
ppm CO
ppm CO
X 02
"/. 02
Z. 02
0.0
181.2
282. 0
0 .0
457, 5
1263.0
0. 00
12. 50
20.60
181 .0
282.4
0 . 7
4 51 . A
1278.7
0. 12
12. 55
20.68
E-2
-------
CAL.IBRATION S LJ M MR V
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incmeraor
REASON: Second system cal - Boiler location
DATE : 05-30-1990 TIME: 19:21 - 20:01
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
GAS
VALUE
MONITOR
RESPONSE
BOILER
BOILER
ppmS02
ppmS02
(.). 0
:18.0
3 . 1
241 . 8
BOILER
BOILER
ppmNOx
ppmNO>:
0.0
!40. 0
2. 1
'41 . 7
BOILER
BOILER
¦/. a:
•/. o:
0 - 00
12. 50
0.09
12.39
10
10
BOILER
BOILER
C02
>: C02
0 - 00
11-01
0.03
11.03
STACK
STACK
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
0 .0
181 .2
4.4
181 .3
STACK
STACK
ppm CO
ppm CO
0 . 0
1263.0
u. o
1268 »O
STACK
STACK
"/• 02
7. 02
0. (.>0
12. 50
0 . 11
12. 52
E-3
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludce Incineraer
05-30-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
TME
od«S92
:iNOx
Z 02
Z CC2
coaTHC
DDi CO
Z 02
20:0s
2.7
1.2
20.65
0.07
101.5
1546.2t
17.87
20:07
2.9
1.7
20.64
0.08
103.1
1597.11
17.76
20:08
3.1
2.0
20.62
0.09
104.1
1703.81
17.54
20:09
3.0
1.0
13.92
0.03
104.0
1768.61
17.43
20:10
-2.7
0.9
12.49
0.01
104.0
1750.51
17.41
20:11
2.6
0.8
12.48
0.01
100.6
1691.01
17.38
20:12
2.6
0.9
12.48
-0.00
98.6
1681.01
17.31
20:13
-20.0
0.8
12.49
0.01
98.0
1702.01
17.25
20:1*
-50.8
0.8
12.48
0.01
100.3
1749.81
17.15
20:15
-14.9
0.8
12.48
0.00
98.5
1745.31
17.02
AVERAGE
VALUES FOR THE LAST
HOUR: 10 FUNUTES OF VALID DATA
20:15
-6.6
1.1
15.07
0.03
101.3
1693.5
17.41
20:16
7.1
0.8
12.49
0.01
97.1
1723.91
16.96
20:17
3.0
0.7
12.49
0.00
90.5
1714.81
16.82
20:16
0.6
0.7
12.49
0.00
87.8
1662.61
16.45
20:19
0.2
0.7
12.49
0.00
90.9
1672.51
16.04
20:20
0.4
0.7
¦2.49
0.01
90.8
1680.81
15.54
20:21
0.1
0.6
12.4?
0.01
95.4
1808,01
14.78
20:22
0.4
0.7
12.49
0.00
102.1
1875.51
14.01
20:23
-0.0
0.7
12.49
-0.00
13e.3
1875.51
12.99
20:2*
0.1
0.7
16.92
0,01
163.5
1375.41
11.96
20:25
0.2
0.6
20.63
0.00
144.3
1B63.61
11.43
20:26
-0.0
0.7
6.34
B.29
193.3
185B.71
10.66
20:27
0.0
0.6
0.08
11.07
372.7
1864.71
10.99
20:20
0.1
0.6
0.06
11.02
734.41
1875.51
10.77
20:29
-0.3
0.5
0.05
11.04
937.01
1875.51
10.79
20:30
-0.2
0.5
0.04
11.04
964.51
1875.51
10.86
AVERAGE VALUES F3R THE LP SI
20:30 0.8 0.7
15 HINl'TES
9.60
3.50
286.8 1806.8
13.40
20:31
-0.1
0.7
0.12
14.81
963.61
1875.51
10.55
20:32
0.0
0.5
0.05
17.95
800.31
1875.51
10.27
20:33
-0.3
0.5
0.06
17.95
3B9.2
1875.51
10.17
20:34
-0.3
0.5
0.10
16.81
103.3
1608.31
10.75
20:35
-0.3
0.5
0.07
11.03
35.3
654.9
11.73
20:36
-Q.Z
0.5
0.11
12.36
28.6
604.9
12.27
20:3/
-0.3
0.5
0.08
17.61
25.5
685.7
12,39
20:38
-0.1
110.2
0.46
9.72
24.2
658.6
12.86
20:39
1.1
330.3
0.13
0.04
24.5
664.8
13,98
20:40
2.1
477.7
O.OB
0.02
23.9
775.3
15.03
20:41
i.e
272.2
0.09
0,03
22.5
737.1
15.21
20:42
1.2
316.1
0.07
0.02
23.1
796.2
15.47
20:4!
1.8
392.3
0.14
0.03
24.0
B70.6
15.73
20:44
155.3
2.2
0.06
0.01
24.9
929.7
15.97
20:45
243.1
1.2
0.06
0.01
27.6
1045.1
16,28
AVERAGE
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 HINUTES
20:45
27.0
127.1
0.11
7.87
170.7
1043.8
13.25
20:46
218.9
1.0
0.06
0.01
31.1
1176.3
16.55
20:47
219.0
1.0
0.06
0.01
33.4
12B6.4
16.79
E-4
-------
Site 9 Se*ase Sludge Incir.erasr 05-30-1970
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN B
CHAK10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
THE
ooaSC2
do&NOx
I 02
I C02
DCiTHC
CDC CO
X 02
20:48
220.1
1.0
0.06
0.01
36.5
1360.01
16.93
20:49
219.0
1.0
0.06
0.01
40.2
1434.31
17.01
20:50
219.0
1.2
0.10
0.02
41.8
1449.51
17.08
20:51
293.5
0.5
0.09
0.02
43.8
1461.31
17.14
20:52
159.9
0.2
0.06
0.03
47.2
1500.41
17.19
20:53
354.1
0.3
0.08
0.01
49.6
1528.41
17.31
20:54
89.5
1.0
14.76
0.05
49.4
1492.21
16.96
20:55
15.4
0.9
19.90
0.07
52.7
1466.lt
16.95
20:56
10.2
1.1
20.13
0.09
58.0
1469.01
17.12
20:57
23.0
0.5
20.62
0.01
60.9
1424.0
17.28
20:56
2.6
0.4
20.69
0.01
70.3
1393.4
17.39
20:59
0.4
0.4
20.70
0.02
75.5
1406.2
17.46
21:00
0.2
0.3
20.70
0.00
77.0
1342.1
17.68
AVERAGE VALUES FCR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
21:00 149.7 0.7 9.20
0.02
51.2 1414.6
17.12
21:01
-0.0
0.3
20.70
0.01
77.6
1284.1 .
17.88
21:02
-0.2
0,3
20.70
0.01
73.7
1289.0
18.06
21:03
-0.2
0.3
20.71
0.00
76.5
1243.6
18.14
21:04
-0.3
0.4
20.71
0.01
75.4
1224.6
18.25
21:05
-0.4
0.3
20.71
0.01
73.8
1189.6
18.32
21:06
-0.0
0.3
20.71
0.00
73.0
1166.3
18.39
21:07
0.0
0.2
14.10
0.01
72.2
1115.4
18.44
21:06
0.8
0.1
4.38
0.01
72.9
1071.4
18.48
21:09
1.3
0.1
4.38
0.03
72.7
1067.6
18.43
21:10
1.9
0.2
4.29
0.04
71.3
1057.8
18.30
21:11
2.5
0.2
4.10
0.03
68.1
1060.1
18.07
21:12
2.7
0.1
4.OS
0.03
67.0
1083.8
17.85
21:13
3.0
0.1
3.93
0.03
64.9
1119.1
17.61
21:14
3.3
0.1
3.80
0.04
62.9
1153.0
17.44
21:15
4.0
0.1
3.80
0.03
62.8
1207.7
17.33
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 ttlNUTES
21:15 1,2 0,2 11.40 0.02
71.3 1155.6
18.07
AVERAGE VALUES FCR THE LAST HOUR: 60 HINUTES OF VALID DATA
21:15 44.7 32.2 7.5B 2.94 145.0 1355.2 15.46
21:16
4.4
0.1
3.72
0.05
61.1
1212.2
17.31
21:17
4.9
0.1
3.72
0.05
61.5
1255.7
17.27
21:18
5.2
0.0
3.78
0.05
62.4
1291.7
17.24
CCMENTS: End of VOST Run 5/30/90
E-5
-------
CftL_ I BRAT X ON SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor
REASON: System cal of stack analyzers after VOST Run
DATE : 05—30—1990 TIME: 21:19 - 21:36
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
MONITOR
RESPONSE
STACK
STACK
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
O. i.)
181.2
8 . 5
180.4
STACK
STACK
ppm CO
ppm CO
0. 0
1263.0
O
«« « w
1261.4
STACK
STACK
7. 02
"/. 02
0 - 00
12. 50
0.14
12.60
E-6
-------
CAL_ I BRAT I ON SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor
REASON: Initial system cal — 5/30/90
DATE 05-30-1990 TIME: 10:31 - 11:09
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
MONITOR
RESPONSE
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ppmS02
ppmS02
ppmS02
0.0
218.0
218.0
6.4
210.4
203.3
BOILER
BOILER
ppmNOx
ppmNGx
O. O
240.0
2 . 9
238.3
BOILER
BOILER
7. 02
*/. 02
0 - 00
12. 50
0 .08
12. 3B
BOILER
BOILER
7. C02
7. CO 2
0. oo
11.01
0 .04
10.89
STACK
STACK
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
0.0
181 .2
2.9
179.6
STACK
STACK
ppm CO
ppm CO
U. 0
. O
2 . /
1277.6
STACK
STACK
*/. 02
*/. 02
0 . 00
12.50
o. i
12.39
E-7
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor C5-30-199C
CHAN &
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
TIME
dosS02
doiNOx
Z 02
I C02
ddbTHC
ODfi CO
I 02
11:16
262.4
121.0
14.37
5.03
50.5
1517.21
16.06
11:17
266.S
120.3
14.30
5.09
48.9
1452.2*
16.10
11:16
264.4
123.0
14.22
5.13
47.9
1417.11
16.03
11:19
264.1
125.5
14.26
5.13
46.7
1345.8
15.99
11:20
25?. 2
129.1
14.12
5.23
46.6
1334.71
16.03
11:21
262.7
129.0
14.08
5.19
47.2
1367.21
15.86
11:22
264.7
127.8
14.01
5.32
48. B
1402.21
15.91
11:23
266.6
115.2
13.95
5.28
50.7
1465.01
15.B8
11:24
253,4
107.4
14.06
5.16
51.2
1451.B$
15.91
11:25
235.1
100.7
13.94
5,34
54.6
1526.71
15.95
11:26
221,6
93.7
13.33
5.36
55.3
1514.71
15.81
11:27
210.8
88.0
13.76
5.41
57.3
1555.31
15.80
11:26
202.0
83.1
13.50
5.64
57.1
1569.41
15.62
11:29
208.7
99.7
13.74
5.47
54.5
1542.51
15.77
11:30
269.4
113.6
13.55
5.61
56.3
1504.61
15.63
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
11:30
247.5
111.8
13.98
5.29
51.6
1472.4
15.8?
COMMENTS: Lost saaole flow at Boiler location
E-8
-------
Sits ? Serfage Sludge Incineraor 05-30-1990
CHAN 6 CHAN 7 CHAN 8 CHAN10 CHAN 1 CHAN 2 CHAN 3
BOILER BOILER BOILER BOILER STACK STACK STACK
TIHE PPPS02 ppeNQx I 02 I C02 peeTHC CO X 02
E-9
-------
Sit? 9 SendQe Sludge Inciseracr
05-30-1990
CHAM 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
BGILER
BulLER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
TINE
O2§S02
dodNOx
X 02
I C02
ociTHC
dds CD
I 02
12:14
120.1
125.0
15.34
3.21
57.3
1511.31
17.44
12:15
us.5
122.E
15.43
3.18
61.1
1467.61
17.50
12:15
117.4
120.1
15.45
3.09
62.1
1425.7
17.55
12:17
i:16.8
117.0
16.51
3.05
62.0
1377.3
17.55
12:18
113.9
113.4
15.51
3.06
62.7
1315.5
17.62
12:19
112.3
105.9
15.59
2.98
63.0
1293,1
17.63
¦2:20
ii».5
101.4
15.49
3.07
62.8
1261.8
17.63
12:21
118.5
110.7
15.11
3.36
59.0
1249.3
17.54
12:22
131.9
126.5
15.41
3.77
45.0
1237.2
16.92
12:23
142.2
125.4
15.45
3.72
46.5
1234.0
16.90
12:2*
138.0
110.5
15.74
3.48
46.8
1205.0
16.99
12:25
115.3
85.7
16.94
2.63
57.0
1170.9
17.63
12:26
92.3
85.4
17.12
2.50
61.3
1157.2
18.06
12:27
80.8
87.2
17.20
2.41
53.9
1259.8
18.11
12:2b
70.5
89.5
17.11
2.42
68.0
1327.6
18.07
12:29
50.3
93.5
16.95
2.58
70.7
1299.5
18.06
12:30
52.9
10o.3
15.28
2.97
62.2
1325.9
17.53
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST
15 MN'JTES
12:30
105.9
105.4
15.46
3.01
59.6
1275.0
17.59
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 17 HIKUTE5 OF VALID DATA
12:30
107.5
107.5
16.45
3.03
59.6
1301.1
17.57
12:31
72.7
115.7
15.72
3.42
Ul
GO
1381.6
17.13
12:32
65.2
122.9
15.31
3.73
50.5
1401.3
16.76
12:33
71.6
129.1
15.01
3.93
25.4
B27.9
16.77
12:34
75.6
133.1
14.76
4.12
21.8
29.4
18.52
12:35
95.0
139.9
14.56
4.24
40.2
975.11
17.49
12:36
120.3
142.9
14.42
4.36
46.0
1519.51
16.19
12:37
127.9
148.4
14.32
4.44
45.7
1564.31
16.11
12:38
136.1
151.3
14.22
4.49
45.5
1604.21
16.05
12:39
151.5
153.4
14.07
4.61
43.8
1601.21
15.99
12:40
115.3
152.5
14.12
4.58
28.5
1409.41
16.03
12:41
97.2
151.2
14.02
4.68
IB.5
197.9
17.44
12:42
96.0
152.4
13.91
4.80
16.6
8.3
19.79
12:43
110.8
153.4
11.26
6.93
15.4
4.9
20.12
12:44
172.2
128.1
7.52
9.70
14.7
4.2
20.14
12:45
249.9
93.4
5.57
11.16
14.9
2.1
20.19
AVERAGE
VALUES FOR
THE LAST
15 MINUTES
12:45
118.5
137.9
13.25
5.28
32.4
835.4
17.65
12:46
481.5
61.6
4.21
12.22
15.0
2.7
20.23
12:47
552.0
57.1
3.65
12.56
14.7
2,7
20.25
12:46
544.6
64.6
4.07
12.52
12.9
3.1
20.27
12:49
534.2
77.4
6.33
10.82
13.0
0.2
20.29
12:50
501.8
91.0
7.51
10.19
37.1
64.21
20.32
12:51
555.0
70.5
5.25
11.26
305.5
1774.71
10.95
12:52
622.1
77.2
5.17
11.90
958.31
1875.51
9.77
12:53
537.2
129.1
3.55
13.21
1000.21
1875.51
8.77
12:54
521.1
195.4
2.57
14.14
1000.21
1975.51
7,72
12:55
665.4
192.4
2.98
14.34
1000.21
1875.51
7.76
E-10
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludae Incineracr
05-3C-199C
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
ChAN 8
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
TIKE
oo«S02
doiNOx
I 02
I C02
odiTHC
Dot CO
I 02
12:56
756.4
176.7
2.92
14.47
1000,2t
1875.51
7.77
12:57
744.9
169.6
4.44
13.22
965.At
1875.51
8.57
12:56
757.2
175.0
5.66
12.38
626.5
1075.5*
9.32
12:59
706.6
205.6
7.58
1C.BC
232.3
1660.41
10.36
13:00
576.7
247. B
9.75
9.1c
74.1
664.0
11.80
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST
15 flINUTES
13:00
603.8
132.7
5.11
12.21
463.7
1154.7
12.94
13:01
443.6
248.8
11.71
7.48
52.6
506.7
13.30
13:02
346.0
214.3
13.35
6.10
46.1
599.1
1+.62
13:03
267.7
183.4
14.50
5.17
43.3
726.6
15.5B
13:04
218.4
175.1
14.46
5.15
40.0
845.5
15.96
13:05
200.7
171.7
14.14
5.36
34.1
780.2
15.65
13:06
187.9
155.3
14.33
5.15
30.7
564. B
15.71
13:07
175.7
148.1
14.36
5.13
28.3
562.7
15.75
13:08
166.3
141.7
14.47
5.03
27.2
575.1
15.91
13:09
160.1
134.9
14.53
4.93
26.3
609.7
15.99
13:10
155.9
131.9
14.49
4.97
25.0
616.9
16.00
13:11
158.5
132.5
13.89
5.34
22.9
563.0
15.73
13:12
163.4
127.6
13.86
5.30
23.0
552.7
15.58
13:13
166.5
131.0
13.64
5.49
22.2
567.0
15.61
13:14
180.7
129.5
13.26
5.62
20.7
531.7
15.13
13:15
185.9
127.0
13.36
5.56
20.8
536.4
15.18
AVERA6E VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 HINUTES
13:15 211.8 156.9 13.89
5.45
30.9
609.2
15.45
13:16
191.2
125.7
13.28
5.61
21,2
560.8
15.17
13:17
197,4
126.2
13.22
5.64
21.2
567.0
15.10
13:18
206.5
127.7
12.B6
5.95
20.9
584.4
14.99
13:19
225.4
135.4
12.10
6.46
19.3
563.6
14.41
13:20
247.2
138.2
11.76
6.71
18.2
563.6
14.08
13:21
255.5
137.9
11.91
6.65
18.1
582.4
14.19
13:22
262.9
138.3
11.87
6.68
17.3
5&B.3
14.09
13:23
269.8
138.0
11.78
6.79
16.6
569.7
14.14
13:24
277.2
145.4
11.67
6.85
16.1
559.9
13.99
13:25
276.0
137.9
12.40
6.39
16.6
599.0
14.17
13:26
258.9
130.2
13.02
5.93
18.8
651.4
14.76
13:27
252.3
127.7
13.08
5.93
IB.8
649.4
14.84
13:28
246.6
125.5
11.16
5.84
19.6
672.0
15.01
13:29
244.1
123.8
13.24
5.81
19.4
656.9
14.95
13:30
243.1
122.1
13.20
5.85
19.5
670.0
15.04
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
13:30 243.6 132.0 12.57 6.21
18.6
601.2
14.60
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 60 H1NUTES OF VALID DATA
13:30 294.4 139.9 11.21 7.29 141.4 800.1 15.16
13:31
240.6
121.9
13.26
5.76
19.6
670.4
15.03
13:32
240.6
120.5
13.26
5.82
19.4
675.3
15.02
13:33
239.2
119.7
13.26
5.78
20.2
684.1
15.09
13:34
23B.0
117.7
13.43
5.70
19.8
677.9
15.05
E-ll
5
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Inciner.ar
05-30-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CKAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
TIrtE
ddi502
D3ih0x
Z 02
I C02
dciTHC
DDI CO
I 02
13:35
234.9
116.2
13.33
5.79
20.6
691.3
15.16
13:36
237.3
116.6
13.41
5.69
19.8
668.0
15.07
13:37
241.1
117.8
13.17
5.93
19.9
674.9
15.09
13:38
246.2
117.7
13.1?
5.86
19.7
666.0
14.94
13:39
250.5
116.6
13.27
5.87
19.7
679.1
14.93
13:40
247.3
116.1
13.51
5.66
21.6
736.1
15,29
13:41
242.4
113.9
13.82
5.44
21.8
751.0
15.33
13:42
237.1
116.0
13.B1
5.49
23.8
802.9
15.52
13:43
230.5
116.0
14.12
5.13
25.2
869.0
15.63
13:44
222.2
116.8
14.19
5.17
26.7
924.4
15.76
13:45
221.2
116.5
14.08
5.19
26.8
836.3
15.74
AVERAGE
VALUES
FCR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
13:45
237.9
117.5
13.54
5.62
21.6
737.1
15.24
13:46
222.4
114,7
14.22
5.07
26.6
8B1.9
15.76
13:47
221.7
116.9
14.12
5.15
26.9
870.6
15.79
13:46
224.7
116.1
14.13
5.14
27.0
878.4
15.76
13:49
233.3
117.3
13.66
5.58
26.5
868.8
15.61
13:50
253.9
117.4
13.16
5.96
26.4
839.5
15.24
13:51
276.9
115.3
12.75
6.30
24.9
826.1
14.96
13:52
293.7
116.1
12.48
6.47
25.3
816.6
14.74
13:53
301.3
115.9
12.51
6.46
25.1
840.6
14.68
13:54
302.9
117.1
12.32
6.61
25.5
855.4
14.71
13:55
311.0
117.6
12.28
6.66
25.4
878.3
14.60
13:56
311.2
118.2
12.25
6.67
24.S
8B2.2
14.63
13:57
307.0
120.3
12.78
6.30
27.9
974.9
14. BO
13:56
297.4
121.0
13.25
6.00
33.4
1073.9
15.25
13:59
284.9
121.8
13.55
5.72
34.3
1062.7
15.51
14:00
273.8
123.5
13.95
5.39
36.8
1108.0
15.68
AVERAGE VALUES FCR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
14:00 274.4 110.0 13.16 5.96
27.S
910.5
15.18
14:01
258.0
126.1
14.16
5.19
39.8
1183.0
15.95
14:02
249.1
128.9
14.40
4.97
41.6
1205.0
16.05
14:03
242.5
131.1
14.49
4.91
46.4
1342.7*
16.22
14:04
236.8
133.0
14.67
4.71
48.5
1345.7
16.30
14:05
220.2
132.5
14.89
4.54
51.2
12B1.5
16.41
14:06
220.3
133.8
15.05
4.40
50.5
1167.2
16.56
14:07
209.0
131.0
15.33
4,21
50.5
1076.3
16.72
14:08
19B.7
123.7
15.75
3.87
54.8
1056.4
16.90
14:09
173.4
122.5
16.38
3.38
54.4
1156.8
17.17
14:10
161.8
122.4
16.53
3.25
61.4
1376.1
17.48
14:11
147.8
114.5
16.73
3.03
68.4
1378.2
17.65
14:12
133.9
113.0
16.91
2.90
68.5
1337.6
17.79
14:13
124.6
125.0
15.95
3.49
62.2
1295.7
17.33
14:14
117.6
127.2
15.78
3.52
57.1
1316.8
16.92
14:15
109.9
131.1
15.59
3.62
57.1
1362.7
16.95
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
14:15 187.5 12b.4 15.51
4.00
54.2 1258.8
16.83
14; io
14:1?
106.0
99.8
130.8
129.5
15.43
15.67
3.69
3.49
54.1
57.2
1351.6
1388.6
16.77
16.86
E-12
-------
5;:e 9 Sewage Sludge Incineracr 05-30-1990
CHAN e
CHAM 7
CHAN 8
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
BOLES
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STAC<
STACK
TIKE
3D!502
CDlhOl
I 32
I C02
soiTHC
C3I CO
X 32
14:19
95.2
132.0
15.62
3.57
60.4
1438.2
16.96
14:19
96.2
135.0
15.2?
3.67
56.5
1416.7
16.66
14:20
93.2
134.9
15.31
3.69
56.3
1443.9
16.67
14:21
93.2
13o.5
15.16
3.82
58.4
1453.11
16.62
14:22
101.4
139.4
15.13
3.84
6C.3
CO
o
16.55
14: i3
101. c
141.4
15.20
3.72
63.7
1555.01
ii.60
14:24
90.9
137.5
15.41
3.54
69.4
1536.H
16.71
14:25
82.2
133.9
15.55
3.44
75.9
1572.31
16.83
14:26
76.1
13ft.9
15.1?
3.67
77.1
1575.71
16.80
14:27
92.4
148.0
14.57
4.09
65.6
1569.2*
16.23
1*:28
93.1
152.9
14.2?
4.29
63.5
15B3.2I
16.04
14:29
101. C
15c. 6
14,14
4.17
61.C
1569.01
15.93
14:35
105.2
160.0
14.C8
4.41
60. ?
1533.61
15.87
AVERAGE VALUES FCR IHE LAST 15 MINUTES
U:30 94,5 HO.4 15.07 3.B2 62.8 1504.5 16.54
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAS' HCUR: 60 MINUTES OF VALID DATA
14:30 198.6 125.5 14.32 4.85 41.6 1102.7 15.95
14:31
105.6
158.7
14.41
4.16
63.2
1635.51
15.97
14:32
99,1
145.6
15.32
3.57
79.6
1665.01
16.68
14:33
199.6
24.1
15.57
3.43
87.6
1581.21
16.93
14:34
229.7
14.1
15.05
3.80
68.8
1539.71
16.96
14:35
105.4
212.5
13.57
4.79
72.0
1516.1*
15.73
14:36
11.3
244.2
13.15
5.08
71.7
1191.91
15.37
14:37
4.6
244.0
13.39
4.88
65.9
844.01
15.59
14:38
3.6
234.4
12.98
5.14
29.9
1616.8!
15.47
14:39
65.1
150.3
12.73
5.18
74.1
1623.01
¦5.13
14:40
102.7
150.3
12.71
5.20
75.9
1659.71
13.07
14:41
108.2
154.3
12.34
5.50
75.0
1599.91
13.20
14:42
120.4
156.9
11.56
6.13
71.9
1313.21
14.40
14:43
167.1
136.3
10.01
7,51
67.9
1683.21
13.56
14:44
241.1
12B.2
9.11
8.24
69.0
1744.41
12.74
14:45
292.0
132.5
9.18
8.24
72.5
1768.71
12.36
AVERA5E
VALUES FDR
THE LAST
15 MINUTES
14:45
123.1
152.5
12.74
5.39
71.0
1532.3
14.63
14:46
305.6
129.4
7,95
9.16
107.8
1354.81
12.03
14:47
343.0
125.4
9.12
8.19
152.0
1875.51
11.91
14:48
340.6
129.9
9.99
7.74
221.6
1875.51
13.04
14:49
367. B
150.2
6.94
8.62
260,5
1875.51
12.56
14:50
422.3
153.2
7.51
9.81
183.5
1375.51
11.33
14:51
471.9
116.6
6.73
10.49
268.9
1375.51
10.98
14:32
549.2
107.4
5.65
11.38
617.5
1875.51
10.16
14:53
576.4
128.5
4.04
12.12
989.81
1375.51
9.36
14:54
517.1
201.6
3.53
12.86
1000.21
1375.51
8.62
14:5!
394.4
349.2
3.18
13.11
1000.21
1875.51
3.28
14:56
204.4
501,9
3.12
13.14
1000.21
1375.51
3.18
14:57
101.2
619,4
3.50
12.74
1000.21
1B75.51
a.27
14:58
83.3
586.5
5.07
12.15
1000.21
1875.51
9.26
14:59
209.1
46B.8
5.01
12.43
951.lt
1875.51
9.38
15: CC
503.5
361.8
6.14
11.71
338.5
1875.51
9.64
E-13
-------
Sitf 9 Settle Sludge Incinerwr
05-30-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
90ILER
BOILER
BCILSR
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
TIME
901S02
cdiNQx
I 32
I C02
omTHC
DDI CO
: 32
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
15:00
358.7
275.3
6.01
11.04
606.2
1974.1
10.20
15:C1
a:.o
313.1
7.80
10.57
172.?
1855.7*
i:.03
15:02
52?.5
232.6
£.27
10.25
1*2.3
1760.51
11.38
15:03
605.4
271.0
8.93
9.74
124.2
lt.S6.5t
11.75
15:04
552.1
26C.2
9.59
9.20
99.7
1386.31
12.19
15:05
479.3
248.C
10.31
8.24
81.2
823.8
13.04
15: Oo
403.4
249.2
11.52
7.58
69.4
565.2
13.77
15:07
357.3
255.9
10.98
7.92
59.4
527.6
13.63
15:08
332.5
247.2
11.76
7.18
51.3
513.6
13.75
15:05
237. B
240.3
12.20
6.79
*5.5
535.5
14.35
15:10
262.5
235.3
12.48
6.54
*0.3
511.7
14.42
15:11
241.2
226.3
12.49
6.47
36.1
513.9
14.69
15:12
222.8
213.3
12.8?
6.13
33.4
524.5
.4.73
15:13
207.5
207.7
13.11
5.96
31.3
543.2
15.0?
15:14
194.;
203.7
i3.32
5.75
3C.6
600.3
15.21
15:15
186.4
191.3
13.72
5.43
30.3
643.7
15.3?
AVERAGE
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
15:15
371.7
243.1
11.33
7.58
6?.?
968.4
13.53
15:1c
174.3
175.6
14.47
4.90
32.1
711.3
16.00
15:17
166.1
16?.9
14.60
4.30
32.4
739.2
16.13
13:18
170.?
173.5
13.15
5.39
29.5
593.9
15.52
15:19
137.3
166.2
l3 • 16
5.35
27.6
529.1
15.12
15:20
197.2
163.9
12.87
6.10
26.9
517.3
15.03
15:21
199.1
160.4
12.92
6.05
25,6
530.5
15.01
15:2?
2C1.3
158.0
12.92
5.08
25.8
515.4
14.95
15:23
203.4
157.2
12.76
6.21
26.3
516.7
14.93
15:24
20?. 7
154.9
12.79
6.16
25.7
512.5
14.88
15:25
214.8
153.2
12.5?
6.34
25.9
512.7
14.79
15:26
223.4
152.3
12.26
6.56
25.3
487.4
14.66
15:27
235.3
US.3
12.CO
6.75
25.1
461.1
14.38
15:28
252.8
157.3
11.10
7.53
24.2
492.1
14.02
15:29
272.3
154.8
11.04
7.51
23.5
494.7
13.66
15:30
279.0
155.5
10.76
7.35
24.0
522.2
13.64
AVERA6E
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
15:30 212.8
160.1
12.63
6.31
26.7
542.4
14.05
AVERA6E VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 60 MINUTES OF VALID DATA
15:30
266.6
207.7
10.63
7.58
193.5
1204.3
13.39
t ^ • 11
1J «
294.5
156.3
10.44
8.06
2ft.s
524.1
13.43
15:32
307.3
154.4
10.19
8.36
59.8
542.8
13.24
323.5
153.6
?.63
8.77
.73.2
587.3
13.02
348.4
154.7
9.33
9.00
21.2
636.v
12.65
' 5'3;
365.3
158.3
6.92
9.34
19.2
706.8
12.54
334.4
167.3
8.83
9.41
IS.9
778.4
12.25
396.4
171.?
3.57
9.66
18.6
827.6
12.25
15:33
39t,.l
186.3
8.95
7.31
17.2
665.2
12.21
15:39
3?2.4
192.6
8.73
9.57
15.8
585.4
12.23
E-14
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Innneracr
05-30-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAX 8
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BCIIER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
TIME
OCiS02
oc»NO*
I 02
I C02
ODiTHC
DDI CO
I 02
15:40
408.4
196.6
6.57
9.69
15.0
605.0
12.09
15:41
409,0
204.1
9.23
9.16
14.9
533.6
12.16
15:42
378.5
216.9
9.50
9.03
14.7
478.4
12.55
15:43
379,0
226.4
9.32
9.17
13.8
454.4
12.39
15:4*
373.2
227.7
9.62
8.67
13.7
453.7
12.61
15:45
351.8
227.0
10.11
8.47
13.4
444.4
12.86
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
15:45 367.3 186.3 5.33 9.06
30.0
1.2
12.57
15:4S
332.6
226.6
10.24
8.33
13.0
443.8
13.19
15:47
324.3
221.5
10.51
8.10
12.9
441.3
13.26
15:43
314.0
216.3
10.67
7.98
12.8
444.5
13.39
15:4?
304.7
214.8
10.84
7.79
12.9
458.7
13.58
15:50
295.2
208.9
11.12
7.58
12.6
456.0
lo,67
15:51
285.6
210.1
11.11
7.59
12.5
454 .3
13.81
15:52
284.1
202.1
11.30
7.36
12.8
459.3
13.76
15:53
275.8
204.0
11.43
7.28
12.8
462.2
14.01
15:54
267.6
200.1
11.61
7.C8
12.9
468.5
14.08
15:55
263.4
200.7
11.64
7.08
12.8
466.4
14.16
15:56
263.4
196.6
11.70
6.97
12.7
467.3
14.19
15:57
256.9
194.5
11.91
6.77
12.6
470.9
14.25
15:58
248.6
189.5
12.17
6.56
13.1
484.2
14.48
15:59
237.0
lfli.i
12.38
6.41
13.3
492.5
14.58
16:C0
231.4
180.7
12.52
6.29
13.5
503.7
14.73
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
16:00 279.0 203.5 11.41
7.23
12.9
464.9
13.94
16:01
219.7
171.1
12.83
6.02
14.1
530.9
14.89
16:C2
211.3
167.7
13.06
5.85
15.0
586.7
15.05
16:03
202.2
161.2
13.14
5.77
15.7
646.2
15.13
16:04
200.6
154.3
13.19
5.72
16.3
633.6
15.15
16:05
201.2
150.9
13.09
5.77
16.2
636.1
15.17
16: Co
204.6
146.0
13.06
5.80
17.0
635.6
15.03
16:07
208.4
146.3
12.90
5.95
16.9
633.6
15.02
16:C8
213.6
144.9
12.86
5.95
17.2
621.5
14.99
16:C9
219.3
143.4
13.02
5.89
17.9
640.3
14.96
16:10
224.2
147.3
12.56
6.27
18.0
647.6
14.88
16:11
238.3
146.1
12.26
6.44
17.1
607.4
14.48
16:12
243.5
146.2
12.02
6.65
17.2
609.1
14.33
16:13
254.7
146.6
11.87
6.73
17.0
603.1
14.20
16:14
263.3
148.4
11.68
6.96
16.8
606.7
14.04
16:15
277.6
153.3
11.26
7.26
16.8
602.3
13.86
AVERAGE VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
16:15
225.8
151.6
12.59
6.20
16.6
616.0
14.75
16:16
269.0
153.1
11.36
7.25
16.3
594.3
13.70
16:1/
294.0
154.6
11.04
7.55
16.6
601,9
13.73
16:18
304.4
156.5
10.95
7.57
15.9
583.2
13.4B
16:1?
313.2
160.7
10.68
7.89
15.6
565.2
13.42
16:20
325.1
161.3
10.46
8.04
15.6
585.4
13.27
16:21
340.2
165.3
10.25
B.30
15.2
598.4
13.06
16:22
351.9
168.0
9.94
8.53
15.2
614.9
12.98
E-15
-------
Site 9 Sewage Siudgs Incineraor 05-30-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAM 8
CHAK10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
SDILER
30ILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
TIME
OCiS02
PDttfh
I 02
I C02
oot'HC
DOB CO
X 02
16:23
360.6
174.9
9.76
8.73
14.7
579.3
12.80
16:2*
400.6
187.2
8.04
9.92
14.4
542.2
11.91
16:25
447.7
201.2
8.21
9.75
15.4
560.2
11.38
16:2c
431.5
224.7
8.52
9.60
13.4
416.4
11.88
16:27
444.2
237.8
7.90
10.05
12.5
392.1
11.49
16:25
ME.8
233.0
8.73
9.44
12.2
373.4
11.79
L6:29
431.5
237.3
8.98
9.27
12.2
365.2
11.95
16:30
428.1
229.4
8.68
9.35
11.7
346.0
12.10
AVERA6E VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
16:30 374,1 189.7 9.58 8.75 '14.5 515.9 12.59
ftVERAoE VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 60 MINUTES OF VALID DATA
16:30 311.6 182.6 10.73 7.82 18.5 546.3
13.46
16:31
433.2
224.1
8.90
9.28
11.7
337.9
12.09
16:32
449.6
222.7
9.25
9.02
11.7
328.7
12.14
16:33
435.2
224.0
9.54
8.77
11.3
324.2
12.51
16:34
403.7
208.6
10.91
7.62
12.3
371.7
13.02
16:35
334.3
202.5
11.79
7.01
14.5
459.6
14.22
16:36
311.2
208.6
11.22
7.29
12.9
381.0
13.70
16:3/
302.9
206.2
11.58
7.02
12.9
402.6
13.82
16:38
286.8
202.2
11.71
6.85
12.9
410.3
14.09
16:35
275.2
194.4
12.02
6.61
13.4
434.0
14.13
16:40
26c.0
194. E
11.B9
6.71
13.1
433.0
14.31
16:41
267.2
205.8
11.50
6.98
12.3
399.1
13.97
16:42
279.3
211.3
11.55
7.00
11.7
391.9
13.91
16:43
272.9
205.3
11.79
6.70
11.8
395.7
14.09
16:44
264.9
204.1
11.96
6.61
12.3
420.2
14.19
16:45
254.9
201.2
11.97
6.57
11.9
421.3
14.35
AVERAGE
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MNITES
16:45
322.5
207.7
11.17
7.33
12.4
394.1
13.64
16:46
250.1
197.1
12.14
6.42
12.4
435.1
14.31
16:47
244.8
196.3
12.08
6.48
12.4
449.8
14.47
16:48
242.0
193.3
12.22
6.35
12.6
457.2
14.37
16:49
241.3
195.3
12.16
6.47
12.7
474.0
14.46
16:50
241.4
193.4
12.12
6.43
12.3
466.7
14.43
16:51
243.4
197.6
12.03
6.56
12.8
464.7
14.31
16:52
251.9
201.2
11.68
6.80
12.3
453.5
14.26
16:53
256.3
198.0
11.91
6.62
12.3
463.8
14.11
16:54
256.9
204.6
11.59
6.91
12.1
462.9
14.19
16:55
267.3
205.4
11.48
6.97
12.0
442.2
13.90
16:56
279.2
216.8
10.86
7.58
11.4
416.2
13.68
16:57
301.5
225.7
10.30
7.90
10.9
366.0
13.24
16:58
316.6
228.5
10.35
7.99
11.0
364.7
13.10
16:59
323.9
229.7
10.19
B.09
10.7
356.8
13.16
17:00
326.2
229.5
10.53
/. 74
10.9
366.7
13,07
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 MNU1ES
17:00 269.5 207.5 11.44
17:01 311.7
223.0
1.0.7?
7.02
7.65
11.9
11.5
429.3
398.2
13.94
13.58
E-16
-------
Site ?
Senate Sledge Incineracr
05-30-1990
CHAK 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CHANJO
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
BOILER
B3ILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
HUE
ppiS02
oookOx
X 02
X C02
dciTHC
DDI CC
X 02
17 :C2
310.9
218.7
10.94
7.49
11.5
390.0
13.43
17:03
311.0
221.1
10.76
7.73
11.6
392.9
13.51
17:04
320.4
222.8
10.54
7.82
11.4
375.1
13.36
17:05
32E.9
224.6
10.59
7.85
11.1
368.6
13.18
17:06
33$.7
231.1
10.38
9.02
11.1
362.7
13.34
17:07
334.3
229.0
10.57
7.83
11.3
362.2
13.21
17:08
335.3
231.5
10.44
3.00
11.4
362.0
13.30
17:09
326.6
223.8
11.04
7.41
11.3
373.2
13.40
17:15
297.7
211.0
11.87
6.80
12.5
448.4
14.11
17:11
276.5
207.3
11.84
6.77
12.3
449.3
14.27
17:12
275.6
207.3
11,70
6.99
12.5
456.0
14.12
17:13
281.6
209.3
11.50
7.09
12.1
435.5
14.09
17:14
287.8
206.7
11.66
6.95
12.3
443.8
13.97
17:15
260.3
204.4
11.74
6.93
12.3
453.6
14.13
AVERAGi
E VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 HIMJTES
17:15
307.4
218.1
11,10
7.42
11.7
404. B
13.67
17:16
275.3
202.1
11.76
6.85
12.3
458.6
14.13
17:17
277.9
203.5
11.71
7.00
12.3
470.6
14.11
17:1B
277.8
201.7
11.64
6.94
12.3
461.6
14.13
17:19
275.4
199.5
11.B5
6.81
12.5
473.B
14.09
17:20
272.8
202.0
11.60
7.01
12.3
462.4
14.17
17:21
279.7
200.0
11.59
7.02
12.2
451.6
13.91
17:22
287.3
208.1
11.26
7.36
U.9
447.3
13.91
17:23
299.1
208.9
11.13
7.42
11.7
421.2
13.72
17:24
308.6
212.0
11.05
7.56
U.7
427.2
13.67
17:25
306.7
208.1
11.17
7.41
11.7
418.3
13.76
17:26
298.7
204.1
11.50
7.12
11.9
434.4
13.84
17:27
297.4
204.9
11.47
7.12
12.2
441.6
14.03
17:2E
232.6
200.3
11.68
6.95
12.3
456.1
13.99
17:29
239.3
213.5
10.74
7.83
11.6
419.5
13.76
17:30
313.0
215.9
10.47
7.94
11.0
377.4
13.16
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 IUNUTSS
17:30 238.8 205.7 11.38
7.22
12.0
441.4
13.89
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST HQlffl: 60 MINUTES OF VALID DATA
17:30 297.1 209.8 11.27 7.25 12.0 417.4 13.78
17:31
331.4
223.4
10.32
9.06
11.1
384.4
13.11
17:32
313.5
200.1
11.78
6.86
12.6
513.2
13.75
17:33
257.8
165.1
13.58
5.59
17.3
721.7
15.24
17:34
229.0
153.2
13.81
5.42
18.7
779.0
15.77
17:35
220.7
141.5
14.03
5.16
20.3
803.0
15.70
17:36
217.9
136.1
14.06
5.26
21.0
814.6
15.85
17:37
21E.5
131.9
14.00
5.26
21.6
816.8
15.83
17:38
222.8
129.6
14.06
5.22
22.0
839.6
15.73
17:39
224.5
131.6
13.92
5.40
23.3
895.5
15.82
17:40
230.0
129.3
13.91
5.27
23.1
894.2
15.64
17:41
233.8
127.0
13.68
5.57
23.9
900.8
15.72
17:42
246.9
115.0
12.30
6.42
24.4
760.1
15.11
! 7; 43
275.5
104.5
12.04
6.57
24.8
605.6
14.41
17:44
295.2
104.3
11.38
7.11
25.6
669.2
14.32
E-17
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor
CHAN o CHAN 7 CHAN 3
BOILER BOILER BOILER
TI HE ppaSO? optHQx I 02
05-30-1990
CKAN10 CHAN 1
BOILER STACK
I CG2 PP>THC
CHAN 2 CHAN 3
STACK STACK
oCO I 02
17:45 320.4
105.7
11.05
7.41
29.9
717.9
13.95
AVERA6E VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
17:45 255.9 139.9 12.93
6.04
21.3
746.4
15.06
17:4o
346.6
112.9
11.16
7.49
26.1
681.1
13.91
17:47
344.5
117.2
11.96
6.B8
23.4
618.7
14.26
17:46
334.0
114.7
12.02
6.93
23.0
621.1
14.36
17:49
335.6
116.7
11.74
7.08
23.1
622.1
14.37
17:50
344.6
116.1
11.75
7.15
22.8
60B.3
14.22
17:51
350.6
115.8
11.46
7.36
23.4
612.3
14.17
17:52
357. B
125.4
12.12
6.95
22.7
620.2
14.40
17:53
360.1
119.0
12.09
7.12
23.2
633.8
14.61
17:51
370.0
122.1
12.01
7.13
22.9
630.1
14.59
17:5;
368.0
118.8
12.27
6.94
23.1
621.8
14.61
17:5i
358.7
120.2
12.44
6.79
25.1
654.4
14.84
17:57
347.4
117.3
12.85
6.56
26.0
654.2
14.91
17:53
342.1
117.2
12.72
6.60
26.9
679.5
15.00
17:59
336.0
116.2
12.78
6.40
27.2
691.3
15.07
18:00
329.c
114.3
13.17
6.29
27.9
704.9
15.26
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
18:00 348.5 117.6 12.17
6.91
24.5
643.6
14.57
18:01
323.3
113.8
13.12
6.32
27.8
717.4
15.29
18:02
329.7
112.3
12.85
6.41
28.2
722.7
15.19
18:03
331.3
114.5
13.21
6.23
29.7
7B7.0
15.24
18:04
329.3
114.5
12.93
6.43
31.2
821.0
15.29
18:0.
332.4
113.7
13.05
6.33
30.7
819.5
15.21
18:06
335.4
114.5
12.97
6.34
32.3
858.5
15.25
18:07
337.1
113.2
12.96
6.43
32.9
864.7
15.21
18:06
344.6
114.5
13.01
6.45
32.9
906.4
15.12
18:09
352.0
128.5
12.55
6.58
35.1
1026.5
14.97
IB: 10
342.3
142.7
12.95
6.35
40.8
1383.41
15.05
18:11
335.1
146.0
13.07
6.34
44.4
1451.31
15.13
18:12
329.0
148.3
13.11
6.23
45.3
1499.51
15.IB
18:13
321.5
150.4
13.25
6.11
50.0
1541.21
15.31
1B:14
315.7
150.9
13.38
5.96
55.8
1561.91
15.45
18:15
307.1
150.6
13.81
5.68
60.6
1574.Bt
15.55
AVERA6E VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 HINUTES
18:15 331.0 128.6 13.08 6.28
38.5 1102.7
15.23
18: lo
285.9
147.4
14.29
5.15
67.4
1562.61
15 >93
18:17
262.9
147.6
15.17
4.57
70.2
1577.B)
16.30
18:16
241.0
145.6
15.36
4.25
77.3
1577.91
16,65
18:19
226.5
142.0
15.68
4.03
80.5
1537.51
16.84
18:20
218.7
137.4
15.89
3.83
80.1
1499.91
17.02
18:21
209.3
132.0
16.06
3.74
81.5
1517.31
17.11
18:22
203.4
127.4
16.29
3.53
81.3
1519.41
17.21
18:23
198.8
124.6
16.27
3.55
84.4
1596.01
17.31
18:24
197.2
119.1
16.37
3.47
88.1
1638.31
17.31
18:25
195.2
114.7
16.34
3.48
92.5
1653.8)
17.42
10: 2o
200.4
126.8
15.20
4.15
116.6
1832.91
16.77
18:27
226.3
131.3
15.11
4.13
129.9
1869.01
16.26
E-18
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor 05-30-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN B
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
the
cd«S02
doqNOx
X 02
I C02
ddbTHC
DDI CG
I 02
18:28
219.2
123.4
16.20
3.53
99.4
1755.41
17.06
18:29
203.5
127.1
15.33
4.13
115.8
1B21.41
16.92
13:30
242.6
142.6
14.10
5.03
142.9
1875.51
15.89
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
13:30 22?. 1 132.6 15.58 4.04 93.9 1655.6 16.80
AVERAGE VALl'ES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 60 MINUTES GF VALID DATA
18:30 289.4 129.7 13.44 5.82 44.5 1037.1 15.42
18:31
281.6
150.5
13.51
5.50
186.9
1875.5(
15.39
18:32
309.4
15B.4
12.82
6.02
187.3
1875.51
15.09
18:33
341.7
168.2
11.31
7.09
202.7
1875.51
13.96
18:34
374.1
171.£
12.041
7.72
268.8
1875.51
13.48
18:35
<14.8
174.1
9.92
8.35
320.9
1875.51
12.90
18:36
454.6
177.0
9.09
B,99
426.1
1875.51
12.47
18:37
473.9
191.7
10.54
7.88
385.3
1875.51
12.60
18:38
417.2
183.9
12.56
6.39
147.1
1052.51
14.53
18:39
353.3
165.5
13,41
5.80
129.1
1851.lt
14.93
18:40
316.3
159.5
14.33
5.12
105.7
1802.n
15.71
18:41
286.8
153.3
14.67
4.85
90.2
1709.51
16.03
1B:42
246.9
152.6
14.84
4.77
87.8
1724.81
16.25
18:43
256.9
165.4
14.02
5.29
77.7
1599.61
15.78
18:44
252.3
168.7
13,90
5.28
69.2
1531.51
15.54
18:45
' 243.9
168.8
14.05
5.20
69.8
1579.4$
15.61
AVERASE VALUES FOR THE LAST
15 MIN'JTES
18:45
336.2
167.3
12.73
6.2B
183.6
1785.3
14.6?
18:46
240.0
170.3
13.98
5.22
68.7
1596.Ot
15.70
18:47
243.0
170.0
13.91
5.29
64.9
1514.51
15.56
18:48
240.4
170.3
14.07
5.19
65.6
1546.31
15.63
18:49
236.3
169.4
14.02
5.20
65.9
1543.61
15.74
18:50
239.2
167.9
13.92
5.33
64.2
1499.91
15.59
18:51
250.6
170.4
13.4?
5.71
61.1
1525.21
15.40
COMMENTS: End of Run 2 - 16:45-18:45 5/30/90
E-19
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incinerator Emissions Test
Averages of CEfi Measurement Data
Run # 2 Run Type: Mfitl/Ni
Run Time: 12:30 - 16:45, 17:15 - 18:45
i. Furnace Outlet Location Stack Location
SQ2 NCJx 02 C02 THC CO 02
(ppm,vd) (ppm,vd) (*/.,vd) (7.,vd) (ppm,vd) (ppm,vd) (7.,vd)
Average: 284.9 162.3 12.00 6.77 40.7 647.9 14.51
NGTE — THC and CD averages are biased low because of the omission of
data from periods when the analyzer ranges were exceeded, making
it impossible to accurately measure the concentration levels.
Data not included in averages
Species Period Reason for omission
S02 14:30 - 14:45 Calibration Check
NOx 14:30 - 14:45 Calibration Check
02 14:30 - 14:45 Calibration Check
C02 14:30 - 14:45 Calibration Check
THC 12:30 - 13:00 Lost power to sample pump
14:30 - 14:45 Calibration Check
14:45 - 15:00 Analyzer range exceeded
CO 12:30 - 13:00 Lost power to sample pump
14:15 — 14:30 Analyzer range exceeded
14:30 - 14:45 Calibration Check
14:45 - 15:15 Analyzer range exceeded
02 12:30 - 13:00 Lost power to sample pump
14:30 - 14:45 Calibration Check
E-20
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incinerator Emissions Test
Averages of CEM Measurement Data
Run ft 2 Run Type: MMtl/Ni
Date 5/30/90 Run Times 12:30 - 16:45, 17:15 - 10:45
Furnace Outlet Location Stack Location
^ SQ2 NOx 02 C02 THC CO 02
(ppm,vd) (ppm,vd) (*/. ,vd) (7. ,vd) (ppm,vd) (ppm,vd) (*/. ,vd)
Average: 284.9 162.3 12.00 6.77 40.7 647.9 14.51
NOTE - THC and CO averages are biased low because of the omission of
data from periods when the analyzer ranges were exceeded, making
it impossible to accurately measure the concentration levels.
Data not included in averages
Species Period Reason for omission
S02 14:30 - 14:45 Calibration Check
NOx 14:30 - 14:45 Calibration Check
02 14:30 - 14:45 Calibration Check
C02 14:30 - 14:45 Calibration Check
THC 12:30 - 13:00 Lost power to sample pump
14:30 - 14:45 Calibration Check
14:45 - 15:00 Analyzer range exceeded
CO 12:30 - 13:00 Lost power to sample pump
14:15 — 14:30 Analy2©r range exceeded
14:30 - 14:45 Calibration Check
14:45 - 15:15 Analyzer range exceeded
02 12:30 - 13:00 Lost power to sample pump
14:30 - 14:45 Calibration Check
E-21
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incinerator Emissions Test
Averages of CEM Measurement Data
Run # 7V2 Run Type: VQST
Date 5/30/90 Run Time: 16:45 - 17:45
: Furnace Outlet Location Stack Location
S02 NQx 02 CQ2 THC CO 02
(ppm,vd) (ppm,vd) (7. ,vd) (*/. ,vd) (ppm,vd) (ppm,vd) ("/.,vd)
Average: 280.4 192.8 46.85 6.93 14.2 505.5 14.14
E-22
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incinerator Emissions Test
Averages of CEM Measurement Data
Run n 7V1 Run Type: VOST
Date 5/30/90 Run Time: 20:15 - 21:15
. Stack Location
1 THC CO 02
(ppm,vd) ( ppm , vc ) (7., vd )
Average: 61.3 1155.6 15.46
NOTE - THC and CO averages are biased low because of the omission of
data from periods when the analyzer ranges were exceeded, making
it impossible to accurately measure the concentration levels.
Data not included in averages
Species Period Reason for omission
THC 20:15 — 20:45 Analyzer range exceeded
CO 20:15 - 21:00 Analyzer range exceeded
E-23
-------
Sire 9 Sewage Sludge Incinerator Emissions Test
Averages of CEM Measurement Data
Run # 14 Run Type: EMSL Cr
Date 5/31/90 Run Time: 10:00 - 12:00
i Furnace Outlet Location Stack Location
S02 NQx 02 C02 THC CO 02
(ppm,vd) (ppm,vd) (*/. ,vd) ("/. ,vd) (ppm,vd) (ppm,vd) (7.,vd)
Average: 18B.6 140.9 14.44 4.9B 51.6 1054.3 15.57
NOTE - CO averages are biased low because of the omission of
data from periods when the analyzer ranges were exceeded, making
it impossible to accurately measure the concentration levels.
Data not included in averages
Species Period Reason for omission
S02
11:26
- 11:29
Lost power to dilution system
THC
11:16
- 11:17
Probe pulled out of stack
14:30
- 14:45
Lost power to sample pump
CO
10:16
- 10:30
Analyzer range exceeded
10:46
- 12:00
Analyzer range exceeded
02
11 : 16
- 11:17
Probe pulled out of stack
14:30
- 14:45
Lost power to sample pump
E-24
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incinerator Emissions Test
Averages of CEM Measurement Data
Run # 15 Run Type: EMSL Cr
Date 5/31/90 Run Time: 16:45 - 18:45
Furnace Outlet Location Stack Location
S02 NQx 02 C02 THC CO 02
(ppm,vd) (ppm,vd) (V. ,vd) (7. ,vd) (ppm,vd) (ppm,vd) (7. , vd}
Average: 247.0 152.6 13.65 5.54 53.9 980.5 15.26
NOTE - CO averages are biased low because of the amission of
data from periods when the analyzer ranges were exceeded, making
it impossible to accurately measure the concentration levels.
Data not included in averages
Species Period Reason for omission
S02
16:59 -
17:08
Changed sample pump
17:45 -
17:46
Lost power
NOx
16:59 -
17:08
Changed sample pump
17:45 -
17:46
Lost power
02
16:59 -
17:08
Changed sample pump
17:45 -
17:46
Lost power
C02
16:59 -
17:08
Changed sample pump
17:45 -
17:46
Lost power
THC
17:25 -
17:36
Sample flow problem
CO
16:45 -
17:47
Analyzer range exceeded
17:54 -
17:58
Analyzer range exceeded
02
17:25 -
17:36
Sample flow problem
E-25
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incinerator Emissions Test
Averages of CEM Measurement Data
Run # 3 Run Types Cr+6
Date 6/2/90 Run Time: 15:41 - 21:45
. Furnace Outlet Location Stack Location
* S02 NOx 02 C02 THC CO 02
(ppm.vd) (ppm,vd) ("/. ,vd) (7. ,vd) (ppm,vd) (ppm,vd) (*/. ,vd)
Average: 245.7 121.9 14.10 5.39 38.6 1026.4 15.72
NOTE - CO averages are biased slightly low because of the omission of
data from periods when the analyzer ranges were exceeded, making
it impossible to accurately measure the concentration levels.
Data not included in averages
Species Period Reason for omission
S02
19:11 - 19:30
Sample flow problem
NOx
19:11 - 19:30
Sample flow problem
02
19:11 - 19:30
Sample flow problem
C02
19:11 - 19:30
Sample flow problem
CO
19:05 - 19:09
Analyzer range exceeded
E-26
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incinerator Emissions Test
Averages of CEM Measurement Data
Run # 5 Run Type: Cr+6
Date 6/3/70 Run Time: 14:54 - 17:00
^ Furnace Outlet Location Stack Location
S02 NOx 02 C02 THC CO 02
(ppm,vd) (ppm,vd) (7. ,vd) (*/,, vd ) (ppm,vd) (ppm,vd) (7.,vd)
Average: 315.0 184.5 11.24 7.17 141.0 1338.4 13.71
NOTE - THC and CO averages are biased low because of the omission of
data from periods when the analyzer ranges were exceeded, making
it impossible to accurately measure the concentration levels.
Only 31 minutes of valid CO data were obtained during this run.
Data not included in averages
Species Period Reason for omission
THC 15:25 - 15:27 Analyzer range exceeded
15:32 - 15:37 Analyzer range exceeded
CO 14:55 - 15:00 Analyzer range exceeded
15:02 - 15:03 Analyzer range exceeded
15:12 - 15:39 Analyzer range exceeded
15:41 - 15:50 Analyzer range exceeded
16:00 - 16:09 Analyzer range exceeded
16:11 - 16:49 Analyzer range exceeded
E-27
4
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incinerator Eaissions Test
Averages of CEH Heasureaent Data
Run t 4 Run Type: HHtl/Ni
Date 6/4/90 Run Tim: 12:00 - 12:07, 12:10 - 13:22
— Furnace Outlet Location - Stack Location —
SD2 K0* 02 C02 THC CO 02 C02
lppa,vd) (ppa,vd) (Z,vd) U,vd) (pp«,vd) (ppi.vd) (I,vd| |Z,vd)
Average: 205.8 157.1 14.10 4.94 102.3 1147.3 15.70 3.57
NOTE - THC and CO averages are biased Ion because of the oaission of
data 1roa periods when the analyzer ranges were exceeded, taking
it impossible to accurately aeasure the concentration levels.
Only 77 unutes of valid CO data Mere obtained during this run.
Cnly 38 cinutes of valid CO data were obtained during this run.
No data Mas collected for the unutes ending at 12:08 and 12:09.
Data not included in averages
Species Period Reason for oaission
THC
12:29
- 12:31
Analyzer
range
exceeded
CO
12:00
- 12:34
Analyzer
range
exceeded
12:45
- 12:49
Analyzer
range
exceedeo
12:53
- 12:54
Analyzer
range
exceeded
13:20
- 13:22
Analyzer
range
exceeded
E-28
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incinerator Emissions Test
Averages of CEM Heasuretent Data
Run * 7A Run Types M5
Date 6/4/90 Run Tiie: 17:15 - 19:15
— furnace Outlet location — Stack Location
502 %x 02 C02 THC CO 02 C02
(ppi.vd) (ppt,vd) (X,vd) (l.vdi (ppi,vd) (ppa,vd) (l,vd) U,vd)
Average: 294.9 195.7 13.3B 5.98 91.1 1195.3 15.22 4.49
NOTE - CO averages are biased Iom because of the oiission of
data froi periods nhen the analyzer rar.ge Mas exceeded, taking
it impossible to accurately leasure the concentration levels.
Only 16 linutes of valid CO data were obtained during this run.
Data not included in averages
Species Period Reason for oaission
CO 17:16 - 18:36 Analyzer range exceeded
16:42 - 18:43 Analyzer range exceeded
1B:55 - 19:15 Analyzer range exceeded
E-29
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incinerator Emissions Test
Averages of CEM Measurement Data
Run # e Run Type: Cr+6
Date 6/5/90 Run Time: 12:15 - 14:30
^ Furnace Outlet Location —- Stack Location
" S02 NOx 02 C02 THC CO C02
(ppm,vd) ( ppm, vd ) (*/., vd ) (7.,vd) (ppm,vd) (ppm,vd) (*/. ,vd)
Average: 262.4 211.2 10.17 7.90 7.7 304.1 5.B2
E-30
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incinerator Emissions Test
Averages of CEM Measurement Data
Run # 9 Run Type: MMtl/Ni
Date 6/5/90 Run Time: 13:45 - 21:00
i' Furnace Outlet Location Stack Location
S02 NOx 02 C02 THC CO C02
(ppm,vd) ( ppm , vd ) (*/.,vd) (*/.,vd) (ppm,vd) (ppm,vd) £7.,vdl
Average: 251.3 213.7 10.61 7.69 6.5 307.3 5.82
Data not included in averages
Species Period Reason for omission
Furnace Outlet Location
S02 19:41 - 20:18 Sample flow problem
NOx 19:41 - 20:10 Sample flow problem
02 19:41 - 20:18 Sample flaw problem
C02 19:41 - 20:18 Sample flow problem
E-31
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incinerator Emissions Test
Averages of CEM Measurement Data
Run # 7C Run Type: MM5
Date 6/6/90 Run Time: 8:30 - 10:15
». Furnace Outlet Location Stack Location
S02 NOx 02 C02 THC CO C02
(ppm,vd) (ppm,vd) (*/.,vd) C/.,vd) (ppm,vd) (pprn,vd) (V.,vd)
Average: 250.9 212.5 10.87 7.33 6.6 365.4 5.85
Data not included in averages
Species Period Reason -for omission
Furnace Outlet Location
S02 8:31 - 8:34 Probe not in stack
NOx 8:31 - 8:34 Probe not in stack
02 8:31 — 8:34 Probe not in stack
C02 8:31 - 8:34 Probe not in stack
E-32
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incinerator Emissions Test
Averages of CEfl Measurement Data
Run # 10 Run Type: Cr+6
Date 6/6/90 Run Time: 11:30 - 13:30
?. Furnace Outlet Location Stack Location
" S02 NOx 02 C02 THC CO C02
(ppm,vd) (ppm,vd) (*/. ,vd) (7.,vd) (ppm,vd) (ppm,vd) (V. ,vo)
Average: 258.4 214.1 10.78 7.48 7.0 368.0 5.65
E-33
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incinerator Emissions Test
Averages of CEM Measurement Data
Run # 11 Run Type: MMtl/Ni
Date 6/6/90 Run Time: 15:45 - 17:45
Furnace Outlet Location Stack Location
SD2 NOx 02 C02 THC CO C02
(ppm,vd) (ppm,vd) (7. ,vd) <*/., vd ) (ppm,vd) (ppm,vd) (*/. ,vd)
Average: 287.9 212.8 10.76 7.43 7.5 372.3 5.66
E-34
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incinerator Emissions Test
Averages of CEM Measurement Data
Run # 12 Run Type: MMtl/Ni
Date 6/7/90 Run Time: 10:15 — 12:15
-— Furnace Outlet Location Stack Location
--SO 2 NOx 02 CQ2 THC CO C02
(ppm,vd) (ppm,vd) (7.,vd) (7.,vd) (ppm,vd) (ppm,vd) ('/., vd )
Average: 262.6 241.1 9.97 8.20 5.7 303.3 5.88
Data not included in averages
Species Period Reason for omission
NOx 10:46 - 10:50, Analyzer switched to measure NO only
10:56 - 11:00,
11:06 - 11:10,
11:16 - 11:20,
11:26 - 11:30,
11:36 - 11:40
E-35
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incinerator Emissions Test
Averages of CEM Measurement Data
Run # 13 Run Type: MMtl/Ni
Date 6/7/90 Run Time: 16:00 - 18:00
—- Furnace Outlet Location Stack Location
502 NO* 02 C02 THC CO CD2
( ppm, vd ) (ppm,vd) (7.,vd) (7., vd) (ppm,vd) (ppm,vd) (7. ,vd)
Average: 323.5 178.5 9.64 8.53 4.9 251.3 6.01
E-36
-------
CONTINUOUS EMISSIONS MONITORING? SET — I.J R*
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor
DATE: 03-29-1990 TIME: 12:34
INPUT ZERO
A/D CHAN DESCRIP UNITS SPAN VOLTAGE OFFSFT
6
BCILER
ppmS02
400
10 .00
V
07.
7
BOILER
ppmN0:<
1000
10.00
V
0*/.
3
BCILER
7. 02
2?
1.00
V
07.
9
BOILER
7. C02
20
1 .00
V
ox
1
STACK
ppmTHC
1000
10 . 00
V
07.
O
STACK
ppm CO
1500
1.00
V
07.
3
STACK
7. 02
25
1.00
V
07.
AVERAGING PERIODS: 10 MINUTES, ONE HOUR,
NO EMISSION RATE CALCULATIONS
E-37
-------
C:AL_ I BRAT I Q|\| SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor
REASON: Initial direct cal - 5/29/90
DATE : =,05-29-1990 TIME: 13:05 - 14:07
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
MONTTOR
RESPONSE
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ppmS02
ppmS02
ppmS02
0. c
218.0
361 .4
0.8
217.5
560.8
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ppmNOx
ppmN0>:
ppniNOx
0 .0
240 . C
47 5.0
0 . 4
240.2
478 .2
BOILER-
BOILER
BOILER
a 02
7. 02
*/. 02
0.00
12 .50
20.60
0. 08
12. 50
20 • 65
10
10
10
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
7. C02
y. co2
7. C02
0.00
11 .02
17.46
< J . 01
10.93
17.67
;tack
ppmTHC
0.8
stack:
STACK
STACK
pprc CO
ppm CO
ppii; CO
U . ij
457. 5
1263.O
0 .9
4 56. i
1292./
STACK
STACK
STACK
>: 02
7. D2
7. 02
O . CJU
12. 50
20.60
0.12
12. 50
20. 59
E-38
-------
OAI_ X BRAT X OM SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor
REASON: Con t i nuat. i or of THC initial dirpct co.I
DATE 05-29-1990 TIME: 14:08 - 14:12
MONITOR GAS MONITOR
A/D CHAN DESCRIPTION UNITS VALUE RESPONSE
1 STACK ppmTHC 0.0 3.4
E-39
-------
C^l_ X BRA T X OM SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Si-?wogc> Sludge Incineraor
REASON; Initial direct cal THC monitor
DATE 05-29-1990 TIME: 14:12 - 14:27
MONITOR GAS MQNITOF
A/D CHAN DESCRIPTION UNITS VALUE RESF'ON.
1 STACK ppmTHC 0.0 0.
1 STACK ppmTHC 181.2 131.
1 STACK ppmTHC 282.0 283.
E-40
-------
C^L_ I BF^T" I OM SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor
REASON: Repeat of SOT. direct ca 1 after range change
DATE : 05—2*7—1990 TIME: 14:28 - 15:02
MONITOR GAS MONITOR
A/D CHAN DESCRIPTION UNITS VALUE RESPONSE
6 BOILER ppinS02 0.0 0.8
6 BOILER ppmS02 218.0 218.S
6 BOILER ppmS02 361.4 368.4
E-41
-------
CAL_ I BFt^T I ON SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludae Incineraor
REASON: Initial direct cal - 5/30/90
DATE : 05-30-1990 TIME: 03:22 - 09:19
MONITOR GAS MONITOR
A/D CHAN DESCRIPTION UNITS VALUE RESPQNSE
E-42
-------
O^L_ I EcRr^T" X OM SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site? 9 Sewage Sludge Incinersar
REASON: Initial direct cal - 5/30/90
DATE : 05-30-1990 TIME: 09:30 - 10:02
MONITOR
A/D CHAN DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
HON I TOR-
RESPONSE
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER-
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ppmSO'
ppmSO!
ppmSOi
ppmNO:
ppmNO:
ppmNO:
7. 02
7. 02
7. 02
0.0
218.0
361.4
0.0
240.0
475.0
0.00
12. 50
20.60
0.8
21S.0
363.8
0. 5
239. 9
476.6
0.06
12. 50
20.65
10
10
10
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
X C02
7. C02
7. C02
0.00
11 .01
17.46
0.01
10.93
17.74
E-43
-------
CALIBRATION SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludoe Incineraor
REASON: Continuation of Initial direct cal
DATE : 05—30—1990 TIME: 10:06 - 10:22
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNIT!
GAS
VALUE
MONITOR
RESPONSE
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
ppm CO
ppm CO
ppm CO
7. 02
"/. 02
*/. 02
0.0
181.2
282 .0
O. O
457.5
1263.0
0.00
12. 50
20.60
1.1
180.9
281 .5
2.8
455.0
1288.7
0. 12
12. 50
20. 58
E-44
-------
CALIBRATION SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor
REASON: Initial direct cal - 5/31/90
DATE : 05-31-1990 TIME: 09:47 - 09:5B
MONITOR GAS MONITOR
A/D CHAN DESCRIPTION UNITS VALUE RESPONSE
1 STACK ppmTHC 0.0 0.3
1 STACK ppmTHC 131.2 i81.4
1 STACK ppmTHC 282.0 283.7
2 STACK ppm CO 0.0 1.1
2 STACK ppm CO ' 457.5 455.4
2 STACK ppm CO 1263.0 1285.9
3 STACK 7. 02 0.00 0.11
3 STACK 7. 02 12.50 12.53
3 STACK 7. 02 20.60 20.64
E-45
-------
Site 9 Senage Sludge Incineraor 05-31-1970
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 3
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAfi 2
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
THE
ppaS32
ddsNDx
I 02
Z C02
doiTHC
one CO
I B2
10:0!
297.7
170.3
9.20
9.97
25.6
916.1
11.23
10:0:
<26.3
170.4
6.82
9.66
19.7
844.8
11.57
10:0:
410.e
166.5
5.04
9.68
16.2
768.4
11.75
10:04
394.0
171.3
9.27
9.51
13.4
619.9
11.98
10:05
37i.l
174.8
9.70
9.20
11.7
557.5
12.16
10:0e
350.7
168.0
11.23
8.05
11.7
552.4
13.01
10:0?
293.4
145.4
13.04
6.55
12.4
599.7
14.41
10:00
229.8
119.1
14.25
5.64
14.0
666.8
15.45
10:09
107.9
106.0
15.26
4.77
17.4
776.1
16.15
10:10
156.8
105.9
15.8?
4.28
20.9
963.2
16.72
10:11
137.7
113.2
16.30
3.94
24.8
1191.5
17.03
10:12
124.4
117.1
16.04
4.04
26.0
1216.9
16.99
10:13
117.5
115.1
15.73
4.10
25.6
1053.2
16.62
10:14
114.5
113.1
15.87
4.03
26.8
1070.3
16.69
10:15
114.0
119.6
15.93
3.94
26.7
1117.7
16.78
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 15 MINUTES OF VALID DATA
10:15 248.8 138.7 13.05 6.50 19.7 861.0 14.57
10:16
115.0
122.6
15.99
3.90
30.0
1130.0
16.80
10:1?
114.4
128.0
16.16
3.76
34.9
1245.3
16.89
10:18
112.7
132.2
16.27
3.66
41.5
1373.5
17.01
10:19
109.6
135.2
15.43
3.51
46.6
1428.1
17.12
10:20
106.2
135.1
16.59
3.37
53.1
1511.91
17.27
10:21
1C3.0
134.2
16.72
3.25
57.3
1547.11
17.36
10:22
99.6
131.3
16.77
3.16
62.0
1570.71
17.40
10:23
94.9
125.1
17.00
2.97
68.2
1585.2!
17.53
10:24
87.3
¦16.4
17.25
2.77
73.7
1567.It
17.73
10:25
80.1
107.5
17.44
2.50
79.0
1553.31
17.88
10:26
72.2
99.6
17.62
2.43
79.1
1485.71
18.01
10:27
64.3
95.9
17.74
2.33
31.0
1463.31
15.12
10:28
59.7
98.9
17.43
2.49
84.5
1477.31
17.99
10:29
57.6
102.3
17.18
2.67
75.8
1462.Bt
17.78
10:30
58.5
106.9
16.73
2.94
72.7
1445.2*
17.47
AVERA6E
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
10:30
89.0
118.1
16.89
3.05
62.6
1456.4
17.49
10:31
61.9
113.7
16.55
3.12
67.4
1376.7
17.24
10:32
67.8
118.7
16.32
3.30
64.3
1352.5
17.04
10:33
76.7
125.9
15.91
3.63
59.9
1273.7
16.81
10:3*
90.0
131.3
15.52
3,88
58.5
1272.5
16.56
10:35
100.7
134.6
15.50
3.90
55.7
1223.2
16.36
10:36
108.5
136.4
15,38
3.99
56.3
1250.5
16.34
10:37
112.6
133.0
15.40
3.96
57.6
1264.3
16.29
10:38
116.5
133.5
15.19
4.13
56.9
1263.5
16.32
10:39
123.3
131.9
15.10
4.19
58.8
1243.6
16.24
10:40
130.8
134.4
14.90
4.35
58.7
1204.8
16.12
10:41
138.5
133.7
14.68
4.33
57.5
1208.9
15.96
10:42
143.9
135.0
14.73
4.49
56.4
1174.9
15,81
10:43
152.3
137.9
14.38
4.60
56.4
1182.9
15.66
10:44
162.4
140.9
14.14
4.98
55.1
1211.2
15.40
10:45
175.3
141.8
13.75
5.34
54.2
1210.4
15.22
E-46
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludce Incinerjor 05*
31-1990
CHAM 6
CHAM 7
CHAN 3 CHAN10
C-M 1
CHAN 2
:hpn 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
t;«5
OOIS02
CDiNOx
I 02 I
:o2
COtTHC
031 CO
Z C2
AVERAGE
VALUES
F3R THE LAST
15 IUNUTES
10:45
117.4
132,2
15.18
4.16
58.4
1247.e
16.23
10:4c
169,.?
140.3
13.48
5.53
54.6
1246.2
14.90
10:47
203.9
142.4
13.20
5.82
5*.5
1274.5
.4.74
10:46
217,4
140.0
12.37
6.04
55.3
1356.31
14.43
10:49
23&.7
142.5
12.47
6.38
63.0
1488.ct
14.17
'¦ o • ®'i
252.3
143.4
11.35
6.81
83.5
1688.5t
13.76
• p.. * I
273.6
icl. 7
12.47
5.48
51.0
1343.ct
13.99
10:52
25t..5
162.3
12.18
6.67
49.4
1163.71
14.07
10:53
275.2
162.7
11.94
6.39
51.5
1467.2*
13.76
10:54
293.4
162.6
11.50
7.29
53.2
16I9.5I
13.57
10:55
309.4
161.5
11.50
7.24
71.3
1739.lt
13.34
10:56
298.1
177.4
12.59
6.52
43.5
12/1.31
14.03
i 0:5 7
253.5
176.5
13.17
6.05
41.2
1253.7
14.55
13:59
242.4
172.3
13.46
5.87
41.0
1270.3
14.84
10:55
229.7
171.4
13.69
5.64
41.9
1342.6
15.04
11:00
218.0
159.3
13.96
5.45
41.8
1355.5
15.21
mm I
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 HINUTES
11:00
252.0
159.1
12.e?
6.31
53.7
1405.7
14.29
11:01
207.8
171.3
14.06
5.32
41.7
1409.5
15.31
11:02
202.0
170.7
14.26
5.13
42.5
1404.4
15.33
11:03
198.d
169.7
14.13
5.31
41.9
1425.6
15.44
11:04
199.7
167.4
14.15
5.30
41.2
1387.3
15.33
XI: 05
207 .0
158.2
13.25
5.98
46,8
1534.61
15.05
11:06
239.6
159.8
12.60
6.25
73.7
1803.2*
14.31
11:07
245.4
159.7
14.14
5.37
51.6
1445.31
15.04
U:CS
222.3
156.7
14.64
4.97
53.0
1471.St
15.71
11:05
207.1
154.4
14.84
4.84
53.5
1442.5
15.91
11:10
201.3
152.9
14.92
4.72
52.8
1423.0
16.02
Hill
195.4
151.2
15.16
4.53
52.2
1379.0
16.07
11:12
¦39.9
149.9
15.23
4.48
51.7
1338.2
16.23
11:13
182.4
150.3
15.49
4.25
49.3
1298.4
16.44
11:14
178.7
148.1
15.46
4.29
75.9
1236.2
16.63
11:15
173.4
146.3
15.77
4.02
66.5
1294.9
16.64
4VERASE VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 HINUTES
11; 15
203.4
157.8
14.56
4.99
52.9
1422.3
15.70
AVERA6E VALJES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 60 1INUTES 0F VALID DATA
11:15
165.5
141.8
14.83
4.63
56.9
1383.0
15.93
11:16
165.5
140.2
14.90
4.53
12.7
569.B
18.28
11:17
170.6
140.3
14.74
4.56
28.3
732.01
18.24
11:16
172.1
139.1
14.66
4.65
50.5
1324.61
15.77"
11:15
175.3
139.9
14.59
4.67
55.5
1400.31
15.72
11:20
177.4
139.1
14.86
4.51
55.0
1309.21
15.86
11:21
171.5
136.6
15.47
4.14
56.8
1276.0
16.40
11:22
162.6
133.2
15.73
3.91
57.3
12B7.5
16.55
11:23
156.1
130.7
15.83
3.87
60,6
1303.9
16.68
11:24
152.3
120.9
15.98
3.73
60.9
1311.4
16.73
E-47
-------
Site 9
Sfwiqe Sluege Irciflgfaof 05-
31-1990
tmn 6
CHAN 7
CHA* 8 CHAN10
chm 1
CHAN 2
:hak 3
£o:ur
BOILER
BOM 3
3ILER
STACK
S'iCK
STUCK
~M
sp»S02
DOIHCi
I 02 I
:02
PCiThC
?ci CC
I 32
na%
147, a
126.1
16.05
3,66
62.2
1317.0
16.H5
124,4
16,17
3.50
121.1
16,41
3,40
119.5
16.42
3.18
118.3
16.56
3.34
63.5
1255.1
17.20"
U4.7
16.59
3.26
66.7
1304,0
17.23
VALUES m fH£ LAST
15 MNUTES
li*.3C
142.2
130.2
15.66
3.93
48.3
1075.1
17.01
U ;3;
ia,s
115.4
16.66
3.IB
65.9
1237.2
17.20
11:52
VJ.2
116.0
16.63
3.20
6e.l
1309.8
17.29
U;33
VJ,t>
117.4
16.65
3. IB
a4.fi
1311*3
17,20
11:34
112,5
118.8
16.53
2.35
65.0
l35o.6
17.1?
U;35
127.5
lie.*?
15.07
4.30
&5.6
1293.81
16.04
llih
1*6. C
124.3
14.94
».40
60.2
1353.61
15.83
Uxl:
170.2
12?. 6
14.62
4.66
70.1
1427.71
15,64
il;3S
175,6
131.6
14,63
M5
67.1
1389.11
15.56
11:3?
185.8
134.7
14.23
5.01
69.6
1467,01
15.36
U:40
195.5
136.e
14.15 .
5.04
67.a
IM7.5I
15.20
U;4i
198,9
140.3
14,07
5.17
66.9
1423.31
15.25
ll;42
201.0
143.0
14.10
5.09
61.8
1356.21
15.19
11:43
199,2
147.4
14.20
$M
53.7
1291.3
15.32
11:44
MA
146.7
S4.04
sas
56.8
IHia
15.21
11:4*
.97,:
148.2
14,21
5.04
56.4
1287.2
15.10
AVEW3E
VALUES FDR >.£ LAST
is mms
11:45
le4.$
131.:
14.98
4,43
b4.7
1351.4
15.92
K:4o
194.1
147.5
14.21
5.03
56.6
1315.7
15.38
11:47
189.4
147.9
14.35
4.88
56.0
1311.B
15.43
Ui4§
185.9
148.1
14.28
4.97
56.2
133B.2
15.47
11:49
185. S
148.2
[4.17
5.05
55.1
1329.1
15.33
11:50
18?.8
150.5
14.08
5.16
ssa
1336.2
15,30
11:51
197,4
151.0
13.62
5,54
55.0
1333.0
15,00
Us 52
214,*
154.1
13.25
5.85
55.0
1359.2
14.70
11:53
232.5
155.9
12.43
6.34
56.5
H04.3I
14,32
11:54
257,?
159.9
12.15
6.?4
5".8
1436.61
13.94
U;S5
287.0
m.o
1L35
7.3?
o9.0
1663,01
13.42
il;56
321.5
152.7
13.72
7,94
76.9
1707.Si
12.90
11:57
360,4
162*2
10.SO
8.55
104,3
1354,01
12.46
11:58
396,9
159.4
?.54
8.£7
16?. 0
1374.61
12.07
11:59
408.1
<88.2
u.79
7.96
15.9
1599.5*
12.66
12;00
350.4
195.7
Ila2
6.88
47.9
1472.41
13.37
mmt
VALUES W THE LAST
15 nimm
nm
264,8
159.6
12,4?
6,48
70.3
1469.0
H.13
12:01
303.3
194.1
12.82
6.42
47.6
I486,91
14,29
12:02
282.1
190,0
13.29
6.07
4B.5
1531.11
14.72
12:03
257.1
183.1
11.90
5.51
54.4
1577.41
15.10
12:04
231.9
179.9
14.47
5.09
56.0
1568.81
15.57
12:05
211.4
171.2
14.79
4.77
SB.2
1596,61
15.83
U:06
194,3
176.1
15*16
4.47
59.9
1S93.1S
16.08
12:0?
132.2
174.5
15.28
4.37
59.6
1582.31
16.24
E-48
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineracr 05-31-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
TIKE
ocaS32
ooeNC*
I 02
Z C02
PtJuTHC
80S CO
I 02
12:08
177.5
172.1
15.27
4.38
59.4
1585.61
16.27
12-.C9
178.0
170.7
15.32
4.37
58.6
1551.21
16.29
12:10
177.9
167.5
15.28
4.40
57.8
1529.21
16.30
12:11
177.1
164.2
15.39
4.28
57.3
1502.St
16.35
12:12
17A.5
162.2
15.48
4.24
56.9
1485.81
16.42
CCMENTS: End of E«SL Run
E-49
-------
CALIBRATION SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor
REASCN: Direct cal checl:' after EilSL Run
DATE : "05-31-1990 TIME: 12:12 - 13:06
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
MONITOR
RESPONSE
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ppmSO;
ppmSO!!
ppmSO'
0.0
218.0
361.4
1.6
204 .6
342.3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ppmNOx
ppmNOv?
ppmNOx
0. o
240. 0
475.0
1.1
24 5.3
489.4
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
*/. 02
7. 02
V. 02
0.00
12.50
20 .60
0.0 7
12.53
20.70
10
10
10
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
*/. CO 2
V. C02
7. C02
u. ou
11.01
17.46
0.01
11.00
17.72
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
ppmTh'C
ppmTHC
ppm CO
ppm CO
0.0
181.2
0.0
1263.0
1. 3
178.2
5.0
1288.9
STACK
STACK
7. 02
'/. 02
0.00
12.50
0.11
12. 44
E-50
-------
C Al X HCFCI^*
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge
REASON:
DATE : 51)5-31-1990 TIME:
MONITOR
A/D CHAN DESCRIPTION
TION SUMMARY
Incineraar
13:07
UNITS
14:20
GAS
VALUE
MONITOR
RESPONSE
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER-
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ppmS02
ppmS02
ppmS02
ppmNQx
ppmNOx
ppmNO:<
'/. 02
V. 02
*/. 02
218.0
361.4
0.0
240.0
47 5.0
0.00
12.50
20.60
0. 4
219.0
364. 1
0.4
240.4
479. 1
0.06
12. 52
20.68
10
10
10
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
X C02
"/. CQ2
*/. C02
0.00
11 .01
17.46
0. 00
10.73
17.73
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
ppm CO
ppm CO
ppm CO
0.0
181.2
282.0
0.0
457. 5
1263.0
0.3
181.7
2G4.6
4.2
456.6
1289.4
STACK
STACK
STACK
'/. 02
'/. 02
X 02
0 .00
12. 50
20.60
0 .09
12. 50
20. 59
E-51
-------
CALIBRATION SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineracr
REASON: System cal after third direct cal
DATE : '"05-31-1990 TIME: 14:20 - 14:45
MONITOR 6AS MONITOR
A/D CHAN DESCRIPTION UNITS VALUE RESFt3N_S_^
6 BOILER ppmS02 0.0 l.o
6 BOILER ppmS02 218.0 206.4
7 BOILER ppmNO;; 0.0 0.9
7 BOILER ppmNOx ' 240.0 238.2
8 BOILER "/. 02 0.00 0.09
8 BOILER '/. 02 12.50 12.45
10 BOILER */. C02 0.00 0.01
10 BOILER */. C02 11.01 10.91
1 STACK ppmTHC 0.0 4.6
1 STACK ppmTHC 181.2 182.0
2 STACK ppm CO 0.0 2.4
2 STACK ppm CO 1263.0 1276.3
3 STACK "/. 02 0.00 0.11
3 STACK "/. 02 12.50 12.48
E-52
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor 05-31-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CHAN10
CHAN I
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
TIME
cdiSG2
ooaNOx
I 02
I C02
ddiTHC
ooi CO
X 02
I5:«9
258.9
154.3
11.94
6.81
39.0
980.2
14.01
15:50
263.3
155.1
11.66
7.01
38.7
971.2
13.84
15:51
276.8
154.9
11.55
7.14
33.6
980.4
13.74
15:52
28B;-7
157.5
11.22
7.48
36.7
941.3
13.55
CQfllENIS; Pulled Bailer Probe to change glass wool filter
%
E-53
-------
Sit# 9 Se«ag« SUdqe Incintraar 05-31-1990
chan b :kan ? zm e chamc chan : :han ; chan i
BORES BCLER 3QILER 30ILER STACK S'ACK STAC<
TIHE og«S02 ociNQx I 52 X C02 caiTHC o:i C3 ! C2
16:45 134.2 142.1 12.93 5.98 49.4 1294.2 14.75
AVERAGE VALUES TOR THE LAST HOUR: 1 MINUTES OF VALID DATA
16:45 18*.2 142.1 12.93 5.86 49.4 1294.2 14.75
16; 46
195.4
153.7
12.73
6.00
49.6
1330.1
14.55
16: *7
205.3
148.9
13.33
5.63
53.5
1472.lt
.4.96
16:46
192.6
149.2
13.45
5.55
56.1
1*76.5*
15.12
16:49
179.2
1*9.5
13.33
5.61
5c.5
1515.31
15.10
16:50
186.3
150.1
13.36
5.65
59.8
1576.41
¦ t
...Uv
16:51
195.1
149.5
13.26
5.69
59.5
1573.81
14.93
16:52
193.5
1*7.4
13.50
5.55
58.4
1535.91
15.ca
16:53
191.5
149.9
13.42
5.58
59.7
15Z9.4I
15.00
16:54
193.9
151.9
13.42
5.61
57.6
1532.61
15.04
16:55
193.2
153.7
13.40
5.64
56.8
1549.4!
15.01
16:56
199.3
149.3
13.41
5.63
57.5
1575.31
14.98
16:57
206.6
151.7
13.29
5.72
55.3
1528.61
14.96
16:56
209.6
152.1
13J6
V77
56.6
1564.01
14.94
16:59
131.3
113.B
17.13
3.52
56.3
1589.21
14.89
17:00
24.0
9.4
20.18*
0.93
55.2
1467.21
14.631
AVERAGE
VU'JtS
FCR THE LAST
15 KiNUTES
17:00
179.1
136.7
14.04
5.21
56.5
1524.3
I*.95
17:01
15.8
25.1
20.42
C.43
60.2
1646.81
14,74
17:02
28.8
15.1
20.45
0.43
58.7
1644.81
14.72
;7:C3
17.4
3.9
20.45
0.44
54.0
1533.41
14.77
17:04
7.1
2.1
20.39
C.42
54.6
1558.01
14.76
17;05
3.8
1.6
20.32
0.42
58.2
1626.81
14.64
17:06
3.1
1.4
20.38
0.41
58.4
1610.61
14.57
17:07
2.6
1.2
20.46
0.42
63.5
1625.31
14.53
17:06
16.3
71.3
19.09
2.43
61.9
1559.31
14.34
17:C?
154.1
144.2
15.12
4.44
58.o
1*12.7
16.06
17:10
137.9
142.9
15.40
4.27
58.5
1382.9
16.44
17:11
192.9
141.0
14.27
5.10
60.7
1*58.91
16.29
17:12
226.6
145.1
13.20
5.83
72.2
1772.11
14.99
17:13
242.9
146.4
14.25
5.09
71.3
1670.51
15.01
17:14
218.5
145.3
15.04
4.50
60.9
1*05.2
16.08
17:15
203.9
144.0
15.23
4.36
53.1
1356.4
16.33
AVERAGE VALUES FGR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
17:15 101.4 75.4 17.57 2.60 60.6 1550.9 15.25
17:16
196.0
142.4
15.44
4.23
56.8
1317.0
16.42
17:17
194.9
140.6
15.36
4.28
57.2
1340.5
16.50
17:16
197.4
143.4
15.50
4.1?
57.1
1327.3
16.45
17:19
193.6
140.5
15.55
4.12
56.7
1305.6
16.52
17:20
185.4
129.6
16.09
3.74
57.2
1267.4
16.76
17:21
175.9
133.6
15.47
4.20
58.0
1232.2
16.97
17:22
204.5
140.8
14.31
4.91
71.7
1662.01
15.75
17:23
211.1
142.3
15.55
4.13
64.4
1357.21
16.11
17:24
191.9
137.6
15.91
3.85
60.7
1269.0
16.77
17:25
178.9
135.1
15.98
3.34
62.0
1323.1
16.94
17:2ft
192.4
134.0
13.35
5.69
77.1
1539.91
15.41
E-54
-------
Sue 9 Se*i;e SlcCge In:ircraor 55-3l-i9?0
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
:hpn &
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
80ILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
TINE
doiS02
ooiNO*
I C2
: CG2
DOi'NC
:o» CC
I 32
17:27
234,1
135.3
12.35
6.35
123.7
186?.71
14.15
17:25
2B9.0
145.9
13.08
5.79
106.6
1777.21
14.11
17:29
257.5
144.1
15.11
4.48
63.2
1349.9
15.99
17:30
230.8
129.2
¦4.29
5.04
58.3
1477.41
16.04
AVERAGE
VALi,£S
rCR THE LAST 15 1lNJTcS
17:30
210.2
133.3
14.89
4.59
59.4
1429.1
16 .ye
17:31
244.5
133.5
.4.64
4.76
18.7
'77 T
19.69
17:32
227.0
145.1
15.41
4.26
9.2
5.7
20.68
17:33
209.1
140.3
15.18
4.38
92.0
4.5
20.67
17:3*
210.5
150.9
14.28
5.06
23.8
5.3
20.67
17:35
238.2
149,3
13.31
5.79
8.7
124.9
20.56
17:36
261.9
150.6
13.08
5.94
38.'
.uao.ii
16vS2
17:37
275.4
153.4
12.88
&.07
55.1
1656.91
14.40
17:38
23c. 5
153.6
12.70
6.25
59.6
1709.31
17:39
29e.6
155.0
12.40
6.45
72.4
1734.it
17:40
312.0
157.7
12.23
6.61
69. S
1764.71
13.90
17:41
321.2
158.4
12.06
6.75
74.4
1736.41
13.85
17:42
326.7
159.1
11.79
6.93
104.1
lE2a.2*
13.66
17:43
345.4
159.5
11.53
7.16
102.9
1824.21
13.4?
17:44
342.fi
159.1
12.07
126.4
1858.11
13.36
17:<5
137,6
75.3
17.71
3.57
148.7
1865.41
13.15
AVERAGE
VALUES
m THE LAST
15 I1IMUTES
17:45
269.1
147.1
13.42
5.81
66.2
1171.6
16.22
AV-W8E VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 60 AINUTtS 3F VAl!0 DATA
1?:*5 190.0 124.9 14.98 4,55 S3.2 1419,0 15.62
17:46
550.5
.55,6
10.98
7,71
147.3
1863.21
13.03
17:47
381.2
158.1
10.68
7.98
152.6
1847.0!
12.92
17:48
394.5
170.5
11.30
7.52
48.3
1192.6
13.36
17:49
368.7
169.2
11.77
7.24
38.5
1030.5
13.78
17:50
354.8
166.4
11.74
7.23
36.3
974.0
13.93
17:51
354.4
U7.5
11.47
7.47
34.0
914.3
13.7B
17:52
374.6
170.9
10.92
B.OB
31.2
865.0
13.41
17:53
415.3
168.9
9.94
3.89
30.0
868.1
12.80
17:54
490.0
164.9
8,47
10.01
46.4
1190.31
11.93
17:55
637.2
166.2
7.10
10.9?
108.7
1785.61
10.90
l7:5o
779.1
183.2
7.25
10.78
162.2
1875.51
10.84
17:57
766.9
200.3
7.78
10.3B
130.2
1875.OS
11.24
17:58
o40.2
214.0
9.52
9.05
58.4
1454.9*
12.33
17:59
474.4
213.7
11.34
7.61
27.6
823.7
13.58
18:00
352.2
202.3
12.65
6.58
25.3
754.1
14.64
AVERAGE
VALUES
m "HE LAST 15 1INUTES
18:00
468.9
178.2
10.19
8.50
71.8
1288.9
12.S3
18:01
290.6
188.7
13.33
6.04
24.9
761.0
15.06
IS: 02
257.3
174.8
13.96
5.56
2S.6
757.B
15.50
18:03
230.9
171.4
14.63
5.12
26.2
839.9
16.05
18:04
209,0
166.2
15.22
4.53
28.7
928.3
16.41
18:05
188.3
166.9
15.67
4.22
31.1
1018.9
16.82
E-55
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incir.eraor 05-31-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
3QILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
TINE
dd«S02
odbNOx
I C2
I C02
DMThD
DDI CO
X 02
18:06
171.B
168.7
15.98
4.01
33.4
1091.9
17.05
IB:07
160.4
167.7
15.49
4.29
33.8
1069.5
16.82
1B: 08
169.1
163.8
14.24
5.11
29.3
830.4
15.84
1B:09
18 5.6
161.7
13.91
5.35
27.2
767.0
15.55
1B: 10
190.5
157.5
14.00
5.22
27.0
753.5
15.54
18:11
187.0
156.3
14.31
4.98
27.7
788.?
15.72
16:12
181.1
154.3
14.30
4.98
28.4
812.0
15.81
18:13
179.4
153.6
14.45
4.93
29.9
844.2
15.84
18:14
177.3
152.3
14.56
4.71
31.1
B93.9
15.90
18:15
175.5
149.8
14.62
4.69
32.2
904.5
16.02
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
18:15 196.9 1*3.6 14.53 4.91
29.1
970.8
15.99
18:lo
174,9
146.5
14.74
4.54
33.4
911.6
16.06
18:17
173.0
145.9
14.82
4.49
35.1
945.7
16.13
18:18
176.4
144.0
14.74
4.56
35.3
956.1
16.14
16:19
178.1
143.5
14.80
4.44
36.8
988.0
16.12
18:20
176.7
140.5
14.93
4.34
39.9
1032.1
16.23
18:21
175.7
HO.9
14.99
4.33
41.1
1064.9
16.26
18:22
175.9
140.4
14.99
4.30
41.2
1056.8
16.28
18:23
177.9
139.7
14.96
4.36
41.4
1046.8
16.24
18:24
163.0
139.5
14.79
4.49
41.0
1050.4
16.12
1B:25
168,2
139.5
14.70
4.55
40.5
1048.3
16.09
18:26
189.8
138.2
14.84
4.41
41.5
1068.6
16.12
18:27
186.6
138.9
14.84
4.44
42.2
1101.2
16.15
1B;28
187.8
139.5
14.73
4.47
41.7
1078.1
16.09
18:25
189.0
139.8
14.80
4.48
41.B
1094.7
16.12
18:30
190.C
139.0
14.66
4.61
41.6
1080.0
16.02
AVERA6E VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 HINUTES
18:30 181.5 141.0 14.B3 4.45
39.4 1034.9
16.14
18:31
195.7
141.6
14.52
4.72
40.8
1067.3
15.92
18:32
193.0
141.5
14.54
4.72
41.1
1078.1
15.92
18:33
199.2
141.9
14.47
4.78
41.0
1071,9
15.87
19:34
199.9
143.3
14.42
4.82
41.2
1064.8
15.83
18:35
200.8
143.8
14.49
4.74
41.8
1127.8
15.84
18:36
199.4
145.3
14.48
4.77
40.6
1093.9
15.85
18:37
196.9
145.7
14.41
4.80
41.4
1113.2
15.79
18:3B
199.1
149.2
14.23
5.00
42.1
1154.6
15.70
18:39
209.3
150.1
14.C5
5.IB
41.8
1119.5
15.55
1B-.40
211.8
149.3
13.85
5.33
40.7
1079.6
15.38
18:41
217.6
151.3
13.73
5.41
40.8
1062.3
15.22
13:42
225.1
152.7
13.50
5.64
39.3
1017.9
15.13
13:43
237.0
152.8
13.10
5.97
38.3
976.4
14.83
18:44
250.0
154.0
12.86
6.13
37.9
974.2
14.5?
18:45
265.4
156.3
12.34
6.5?
36.2
938.8
14.2?
AVERA6E VALUES FOR THE LASI 15 HINUTES
18:45 213.5 147.9 13.93 5.24
40.3 1062.7
15.45
E-56
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludae Incineraor 05-31-1990
CHAN 6 CHAN 7 CHAN 8 CHAN10 CHAM 1 CHAN 2 CHAN 3
BOILER BOILER BOILER BOILER STACK STACK STACK
TIRE ocaSQ2 ppaNOx I 02 Z CQ2 ppaTHC ppa CQ X 02
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 60 MINUTES OF VALID DATA
16:45 265.2 157.7 13.38 5.78 45.2 1064.3 15.10
18:46 2B9.S
18:47 320.5
18:AB 362.9
18:49 405.3
18:50 383.1
16:51 343.5
159.1
11.66
163.7
10.91
164.9
9.96
166.9
10.40
166.0
12.12
164.4
12.36
7.18
34.4
7.78
32.2
8.58
31.0
8.24
34.4
6.97
32.5
6.68
32.6
907.0 13.81
875.4 13.25
903.5 12.59
1096.9 12.92
953.0 14.03
1055.1 14.20
COMMENTS: End of Run - 16:45-18:45 5/31/90
E-57
-------
CALIBRATION SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor
REASON: System cal after Run 16:45-18:45
DATE : 05-31-1990 TIME: 18:52 - 19:32
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
SAS
VALUE
MONITOR
RESPONSE
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ppmS02
ppmSQ2
ppmNOx
ppmNOx
7. 02
7. 02
0.0
218.0
0 .0
240.0
0.00
12. 50
4.7
215.1
0.8
240.9
0.08
12.50
10
10
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
7. C02
7. C02
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
ppm CO
ppm CO
7. 02
7. 02
0.00
11.01
0.0
181.2
0.0
1263.0
0. 00
12. 50
0.02
10.92
1.6
IB 0.0
3.0
1275.4
0.08
12. 55
E-58
-------
CALIBRATION SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage? Sludge Incrtneraor
REASON: Iniial direct cal — 6/1/90
DATE : 0^-01-1990 TIME: 07:46 - 08:33
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
MONITOR
RESPONSE
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ppmS02
ppmS02
ppmS02
ppmNO).
ppmNO:-;
ppmNOv:
7. 02
7. 02
7. 02
0.0
218.0
361 .4
0.0
240.0
475.0
0.00
12. 50
20.60
0.8
213.5
363.4
0.5
239.9
473.9
0.05
12 . 50
20.64
10
10
10
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
7. C02
7. CO 2
7. C02
0.00
11.01
17.46
0.01
11.03
17.81
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
ppm CO
ppm CO
ppm CO
ppm CO
7. 02
7. 02
0 . 0
181.2
282.0
0.0
4-57. 5
457.5
1263.0
o. 00
12. 50
0.7
181.7
283. 6
0.8
455.9
454.9
1287.5
0.11
12. 50
E-59
-------
Oi^l_ X T X OlNi SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludc© Incineraor
REASON: Initial direct cal — 6/3/90
DATE : $6—03—1990 TIME; 09:55 - 14:22
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
MONITOR
RESPONSE
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER-
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ppmSO;
ppmSO;
ppmSO'
ppmNO:
ppmNO:
ppmNO:
7. 02
"/- 02
*/. 02
0.0
218.0
361 .4
0 .0
240.0
475.0
0.00
12. 50
20.60
1.2
217.5
362. 5
0. 5
240.3
477.1
0.07
12.50
20 . 64
10
10
10
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
*/. C02
7. CO 2
7. C02
0 - 00
11.01
17.46
—0 . uo
10.94
17.67
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
ppm CO
ppm CO
ppm CO
7. 02
7. 02
7. 02
0.0
181 .2
282.0
0. 0
¦457.5
1263.0
0. 00
12. 50
20.60
-0 .0
181.0
283.7
-0.9
449.6
1271.9
0.11
12. 50
20. 58
E-60
-------
C^L_ X EX ON SIJMNAF^V
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Irtcmersor
REASON: Initial system cai - 6/3/90
DATE : .106-03-1990 TINE: 14:22 - 14:51
MONITOR GAS MONITOR
A/D CHAN DESCRIPTION UNITS VALUE RESPONSE
6 BOILER ppmS02 o.O 1.^
6 BOILER pp.nS02 213.0 206.8
7 BOILER ppmNOx 0.0 1.0
7 BOILER ppmNOx 240.0 236.6
3 BOILER "/. 02 0.00 0.08
8 BOILER V. 02 12.50 12.41
10 BOILER 7. 002 o.OO o.
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incinersor 06-03-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CHAN1C
cm i
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STAC<
TIME
oafiSG?
coaNOx
t a?
I C32
ooeTHC
eci CO
X 02
14:5?
84.5
127.3
15,94
3.32
100.0
1718.31
16.93
l*:5t
86.8
123.8
16.03
3.24
102.6
1686.lt
16.98
14:57
85.8
119.7
16.17
3.17
103.1
1639.91
17.09
14:56
79.7
114.3
16.32
3.02
102.4
1535.91
17.23
14:59
75.0
109.4
16.39
2.97
106.8
1561.51
17.28
15:00
73.3
104.0
16.43
2.94
111.3
1506.71
17.32
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 6 MNUTE5 OF VALID DATA
15:00 81.0 116.4 16.21 3.11 104.4 1616.4
17.14
15:01
70.3
97.3
16.53
2.81
117.4
1460.0
17.37
15:02
65.7
93.3
16.69
2.71
119.3
1447.Bt
17.50
15:03
60.5
39.8
16,83
2.59
123.5
1445.0*
17.60
15:04
57.2
36.9
17.01
2.41
120.4
1379.5
17.73
15:05
56.9
32.2
17.17
2.28
122.0
1381.6
17.87
15:06
56.1
76.5
17.31
2.14
125.8
1360.6
17.93
15:07
52.4
70.0
17.48
1.97
130.0
1273.7
16.10
15:06
43.9
62.4
17.71
1.86
134.5
1150.9
16.29
15:09
34.3
62.6
17.*B
1.96
131.7
1054.9
18.26
15:10
27.3
69.0
17.15
2.13
126.G
1058.3
17.93
15:11
22.9
35.9
16.29
2.70
121.9
1302.5
17.60
15:12
22.4
96.3
15.81
2.97
119.9
1452.31
17.09
15:13
22.3
108.0
15.40
3.25
111.5
1586.61
16.93
15:14
25.3
124-0
14.72
3.72
107.4
1672.81
16.63
15:15
31.7
140.3
13.88
4.20
95.2
1696.41
15.96
AVERA6E VALUES FDR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
15:15 43.3 89.6 16.50 2.65
120.4 1381.5
17.52
15:1a
40.0
152.6
13.44
4.52
93.5
1752.11
15.73
15:17
50.2
172.1
12.47
5.23
81.2
1811.lt
15.03'
IS: 1&
66.1
182.7
11.81
5.7B
74.0
1334.9?
14.64
15:19
94.6
188.3
10.73
6.66
64.7
1804.51
13.98
15:20
139.4
180.0
9.23
7.92
59.4
1756.81
13.14
15:21
229.2
135.6
6.76
9.93
84.6
1812.4*
11.68
15:22
366.1
126.1
5.63
10.48
426.3
1875.51
10.20
15:23-
426.4
163.5
7.63
9.40
521.4
1875.51
10.64
15:24
412.2
15B.5
8.69
8.91
657.9
1875.51
12.17
15:25
406.7
163.4
8.OB
9.33
909.11
1875.51
11.86
15:2t>
400.5
196.9
8.06
9.44
994.31
1875.51
11.51
15:2?
406.2
190.6
3.06
9.66
904.lt
1B75.5*
11.82
15:28
443.5
181.6
6.75
10.65
315.9
1375.51
11.12
15:29
521.4
182.4
5.93
11.25
575.2
1875.51
10.33
15:30
5S5.3
196.9
6.20
10.98
728.4
1875.5*
9.86
AVERAGE
VALUES FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
15:30
303.9
171.4
3.64
B.69
466.0
1B43.5
12.25
15:31
535.0
188.3
6.95
10.60
*95.5
1075.51
10.62
15:32
542.9
191.3
6.64
10,83
778.21
1875.51
10.43
15:33
542.4
207.7
6.33
11.14
9B0.4I
1875.51
10.21
15:34
533.6
223.4
5.90
11.57
1000.21
1875.5*
9,93
15:35
525.6
237.7
5.56
11.83
1000.21
1B75.5*
9.68
15:36
521.2
257.2
5.51
11.92
1000.21
1875.5*
9.48
E-62
-------
Site 9
SeN&ge Sludoe Incineraor
06-03-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
ChAN 6
CHAMO
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
TIKE
oo#S02
ooaNOj
: 02
: co2
ooaTHC
009 CO
X 02
15:37
531.5
269.9
5.62
11.96
822.21
1B75.51
9.58
15:38
551.7
268.4
7.18
10.76
289.3
1B75.0I
10.38
15:39
519.0
250.2
9.00
9.43
90.1
I350.lt
11.69
15:40
*46.4
262.9
11.15
7.65
60.7
11*7.3
13.12
15:41
366.2
230.3
12.42
6.61
61.*
1*12.51
14.43
15:42
320.3
206.3
12.54
6.41
60.8
1367.61
14.61
15:43
293.7
200.0
13.11
5.96
60.8
141B.5S
14.91
15:44
269.9
195.*
13.61
5.57
65.6
1586.21
15.25
15:45
251.3
195.9
13.66
5.51
67.3
16*7.41
15.50
AVERAGE VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 HIMJTES
15:45
*50.1
225.7
9.01
9.19
455.5
1662.2
11.99
15:46
241.0
194.1
13.92
5.30
67.0
165*.01
15.56
15:47
229.3
191.6
14.09
5.15
67.2
1657.31
15.77
15:48
218.2
191.7
14.32
*.95
67.5
1667.31
15.87
15:49
209.5
190.1
14.47
*.81
63.6
1668.01
16.01
15:50
204.0
185.6
13.02
5.88
63.6
1557.01
15.50
15:51
221.4
100.7
11.97
6.*7
55.2
1338.*
14.26
15:52
235.7
181.3
11.96
6.*8
53.9
1339.9
14.06
15:53
2*3.0
186.0"
12.40
6.31
52.4
13*3.6
14.41
15:5*
2*5.9
179.5
11.66
6.77
*9.6
1274.0
14.20
15:55
259.7
182.5
11.16
7.09
*5.0
1158.*
13.69
15:56
264.4
168.1
11.17
7.04
*3.3
1168.0
13.66
15:57
267.7
186.1
11.03
7.20
*3.2
1170.4
13.58
15:58
279.7
185.3
10.76
7.*0
*3.2
11B0.6
13.42
15:59
298.2
183.7
10.32
7.76
*5.4
1310.2
13.19
16:00
320.4
182.1
10.04
8.00
52.3
1502.91
12.87
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
16:00
249.2
185.9
12.15
6.**
54.5
1399.3
14.40
AVERA6E VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 60 MINUTES OF VALID DATA
16:00
261.6
168.2
11.58
6.74
274.1
1571.6
14.04
16:01
16:02
16:03
16:04
16:05
16:0b
16:07
16:08
16:0V
16:10
16:11
16:1?
16:13
16:14
16: L5
343.2
351.0
303.7
273.1
262.1
260.6
259.8
261.6
266.6
286.3
301.6
350.4
38B.0
404.6
419.8
163.5
193.6
194.3
186.7
164.3
1B3.0
182.8
183.7
167.7
189.0
180.3
176.7
179.6
130.7
181.4
9.63
11.49
13.34
13.5?
13.81
13.73
13.73
13.59
12.46
12.12
11.22
10.11
9.71
9.57
9.29
8.25
6.89
5.67
5.43
5.30
5.37
5.39
5.50
6.36
6.59
7.32
B.15
8.46
8.60
8.B4
87.1
33.9
51. B
56.4
59.9
59.B
58.0
56.2
47.7
43.4
50.6
116.5
151. B
143.9
155.5
1767.61
1699.91
1*97.31
1591.41
1592.31
1555.61
1549.61
1515.41
1362.31
1270.8
1347.31
1B64.51
1B75.5J
186B.71
1872.01
AVERA3E VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
16:15 315.5 IB*.5 11.B3
6.81
81.5 1615.3
14.00
E-63
-------
Site 5 Sewage Sludoe incineraor 06-03-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
TIME
co»SG2
DOlNQx
I 02
: co 2
od»THC
Dot CG
X 02
16:16
426.8
181.3
9.02
9.05
146.6
1862.4*
12.07
16:1/
434.5
180.6
8.99
9.10
157.3
1862.8)
11.97
16:18
422.4
183.3
10.12
8.14
134.5
1853.71
12.33
16:19
381.3
188.5
11.22
7.25
94.2
1851.81
13.27
16:20
35V0
185.2
11.27
7.23
89.1
1853.31
13.59
16:21
348.6
183.2
11.17
7.29
91.9
1B61.2!
13.59
16:22
351.2
182.3
11.20
7.31
96.1
1870.01
13.54
16:23
352.4
180.2
11.05
7.44
93.9
1861.41
13.57
16:24
357.1
178.7
10.91
7.59
99.6
1867.51
13.52
16:25
380.9
176.7
9.79
B.40
169.9
1872.9*
12.63
16:2c
398.4
177.7
9.72
8.47
207.6
1874.31
12.53
16:27
410.2
184.3
9.69
8.53
248.1
1875.51
12.43
16:26
416.4
188.5
9-58
8.58
279.9
1875.51
12.41
16:29
416.3
191,4
9.63
8.51
253.2
187-5.51
12.37
16:30
408.5
189.6
9.62
5.53
228.9
1875.51
12.45
AVERAGE VALUES FOR IKE LAST 15 MINUTES
16:30 390.6 183.4 10.20
J. 09
159.4 1866.2
12.82
16:31
404.9
191.5
9.56
8.56
214.8
1875.5*
12.43
16:32
404.9
191.4
9.58
8.55
221.0
1875.51
12.39
16:33
407.4
193.4
9.49
B.65
222.1
1875.5*
12.37
16:34
410.8
197.6
9.43
8.71
236.2
1875.5*
12.32
16:35
415.1
203.2
9.27
8.81
244.5
1875.5*
12.26
16:3a
422.0
206.2
9.13
8.91
237.4
1875.5*
12.12
16:37
437.8
218.6
8.31
9.59
259.9
1875.5*
11.96
16:39
466.3
231.3
7.35
9.88
314.5
1875.5*
11.47
16:39
480.8
244.9
7.56
10.07
290.0
1875.5*
11.20
16:40
495.9
250.2
7.03
10.48
241.3
1875.5*
10.96
16:41
511.3
252.3
7.33
10.36
165.9
1875.5*
10.79
16:42
525.1
234.3
6.73
10.91
150.8
1B75.5*
10.73
16:43
CM
CO
in
222.4
5.66
11.87
159.9
1B75.5*
10.07
16:44
679.8
222.4
4.78
12.56
231.0
1875.5*
9.44
16:45
741.3
242.4
4.74
12.50
313.8
1875.5*
9.28
AVERA6E VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
16:45 492.9 220.1 7.76 10.03
234.9 1875.5
11.32
16:46
727.2
283.7
5.74
11.71
211.3
1B75.5*
9.89
16:47
667.9
312.7
7.35
10.45
122.7
1875.5*
10.71
16:48
551.0
295.B
9.34
9.06
58.9
1864.7*
12.11
16:49
458.6
275.3
10.46
8.27
39.3
1455.6*
12.93
16:50
381.7
275.3
11.48
7.38
24.6
969.4
13.61
16:51
324.9
269.1
12.24
6.72
21.4
961.0
14.12
16:52
289.6
248,8
12.93
6.21
21.9
1010.7
14.55
16:53
266.4
233.2
13.43
5.96
21.7
1017.6
15.12
16:54
259,6
217.9
13.70
5.72
22.0
988.5
15.32
16:55
256.4
210.2
13.79
5.68
22.0
1000.9
15.37
16:5t>
257.5
209.2
13.68
5.79
22.5
993.1
15.44
16:57
261.5
205.5
13.64
5.80
21.6
973.7
15.31
16:58
269.3
204.5
13.48
5.98
21.2
968.1
15.21
16:59
273.5
202.4
13.43
5.96
21.7
981.4
15.20
17:00
274.0
198.2
13.19
6.15
21.5
967.9
15.08
E-64
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sladge Incineraor
06-03-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 9
CHANiO
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
TIHE
PP.SC2
PPlNOn
Z 02
I C02
ppiTHC
C3I CO
I C2
AVEfiftSc
values fcr the last
15 MMJTES
17:C3
367.9
242.3
11.86
7.12
45.3
1193.c
14,00
WSASE
VAIJES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 6C MINUTES Of VALID CA'
'A
17:00
3?;.;
207.7
10.41
6.01
130.2
lc37.i
13.03
1 ?: 01
277.0
197.1
12.35
6.32
21.3
93C.7
14.76
17:02
231.1
192.C
12.58
6.43
21.1
920.6
14.o2
17:03
238.6
188.1
12.22
5.71
21.7
93S.2
14.30
17 :C4
296.2
167.7
12.13
6.75
22.6
966.9
14.27
17:05
¦>97 •
187.0
12.25
6.58
23.7
IOC?.3
14.27
17; C a
233.3
lEB.5
12.24
6.66
25.3
ioao.9
14.38
1* :C7
209.8
139.1
12.40
6.48
28. B
1162.6
14.*5
17:05
289.7
139.9
.2.45
6.52
32.7
1276.5
14.59
17:0?
290.2
137.5
12.44
6.49
37.5
1310.0
14.59
17:10
298.1
136.5
12.36
6.58
36.8
1521.0
14.47
17:11
3C2.3
111.8
12.16
6.75
39.0
1364.9
14.46
17:12
nr. 7
177.0
11.86
6.98
37.1
1351.5
14.18
17:1*
331.9
107.3
11.50
7.28
34.4
1334.1
13.97
17:14
343.6
173.0
11.42
7.36
33.e
¦312.9
13.7?
17:15
339.6
104.9"
11.64
7.15
33.9
1318.0
13.90
AVERAGE VALUES
rOR THE Lfiai
, 15 K1NUTES
17:15
302.2
171.2
12.17
5.75
30.0
1173.2
14.33
CCMSNTS: En: cf Run 15:00-17:00 4/3/90
E-65
-------
OPiLIEcR^nriOtNl SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineracr
REASON: Second system cai
DATE 06-03-1990 TIME: 17:16 - 18:24
a/:
:hAN
MCNITOR
DESCRIPTION
BOILER
BCILER
UN ITS
ppmS02
ppnS02
gag
VALUE
O .
213. 0
MONITOR
RESPONSE
!09 . 3
BOILER
BOILER
ppnNOx
pprnNOV.
0 . 0
:40 . 0
1 . 7
37 .
BOILER
BOILER
*/. 02
7. C2
O . 00
12 . 35
0 . 09
12 . 34
10
10
BOILER
BOILER
•/. co:
x co:
0. 00
11.01
0 .0 4
10 . 84
STACK
STACK
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
0 .0
181.2
2. 1
177.7
STACK
STACK.
ppm CO
ppm CO
u. u
1263.0
-1.4
1254.3
STACK
STACK
7. 02
7. 02
o. oo
12 . 50
0 . i 1
12.32
E-66
-------
C AL_ I BRAT I OlNl SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor
REASON: initial direct ca1 - 6/4/90
DATE : 04-04—1990 TIME: 09:12 - 10:03
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNIT!
GAS
VALUE
MONITOR
RESPONSE
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ppmS02
pr)mS02
ppmS02
O. 0
: 18 .0
:61 .4
219 . 7
363.2
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ppmMOx
ppmNOx
ppmNOx
U. 0
240.0
475.0
O. 3
241 .0
478.4
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
X 02
X 02
'/. 02
0.00
12. 50
20.60
0» 0 5
12. 50
20.63
10
10
10
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
X C02
X C02
X C02
u. ou
11-01
17.46
(j . 00
10 a 96
17.73
STACK
STACK
STACK
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
0.0
181 .2
282.0
1.0
181 . 5
284.0
STACK
STACK
STACK
ppm CO
ppm CO
ppm CO
0 .0
4$7 . 5
1263.0
n , 'j
455.3
1294.2
STACK
STACK
STACK
X 02
X 02
X 02
0.00
12. 50
20.60
0.05
12. 50
20.60
STACK
STACK
STACK
X C02
X C02
X C02
0.00
11.01
17.46
0.02
10.95
17.56
E-67
-------
CALIBRATION SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site ? Sswaqe Sludge Incmeraor
REASON: Initial system cal
DATE ; 06-04-1990 TIME: 10:03 - 10:49
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
M0NITOR
RESPONSE
BOILER
BOILER
ppmSO'
ppmSO!
0 . o
'61 . 4
3.1
336.1
BOILER
BOILER
pprcNOx
ppmNOx
0.0
:40.0
1 . 0
235. 7
BOILER
BOILER
"/. 02
02
0.0 0
12.50
0.06
12.31
10
10
BOILER
BOILER
"/. C02
*/. C02
O „ 00
11.01
0.01
10.89
STACK
stack:
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
U . u
181.2
B. 7
133 . 4
STACK
STACK
ppm CO
ppm CO
O . u
1263.0
1 .2
1283.2
STACK
stack:
•/. 02
•/. 02
0.00
12. 50
0.09
12.3-e
STACK
STACK
*/. C02
7. C02
U . 00
11.01
-0.01
10.77
E-68
-------
Site 9 Senate Sludge Incineraor 06-C4-1990
CHAN 6
CfiAN 7
CHAN 8
ChftNIO
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
CHAN 4
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BCILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
TIH-
oc«S02
ocoNOx
I 02
1 C02
do«THC
OD* CO
I 02
X C02
10:52
521.8
535.4
7.27
10.80
141.7
1612.0*
9.56
9.02
10:53
446.9
459.2
9.08
0.72
66.3
802.0
11.73
7.25
10:54
376.8
396.2
11.32
7.55
56.4
809.4
13.16
6.07
10:55
335.0
346.1
12.09
6.91
51.4
860.6
13.93
5.47
10:56
300.8
306.?
12.84
6.23
47.4
912.2
14,48
4.94
10:57
2^6.8
279.6
13.50
5.75
46.2
979.4
15.00
4.54
10:56
236.3
257.9
14.00
5.33
45.9
1046.8
15.49
4.12
10:5*
210.6
246.3
14.38
5.0:
44.9
1094.6
15.78
3.82
11:00
194.5
239.8
14.42
4.94
44.4
1164.5
15.91
3.68
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 9 MINUTES OF VALID DATA
llsCO 321.1 340.7 12.19 6.80 60.5 1031.3
13.89
,44
11:01
185.5
236.7
14.36
4.92
41.6
1076.2
15.74
3.76
11:02
180.4
235.0
14.46
4.83
40.3
1098.1
15.76
3.67
11:03
177.0
233.0
14.51
4.79
38.2
1093.9
15.82
3.65
11:04
173.3
230.5
14.58
4.69
37.7
1136.3
15.87
3.61
11:05
171.0
229,1
14.56
4.76
37.2
1156.0
15.09
3.60
ll:Oo
173.1
223.1
14.49
4.79
36.1
1145.8
15. B6
3.60
11:0?
174.0
229,2
14.39
4.88
36.1
1188.3
15.01
3.62
11:08
171.4
221,8
14.54
4.71
' 37.2
1212.1
15.05
3.61
11:09
170.4
220.6
14.49
4.80
37.6
1246.9
15.05
3.57
11:10
175.3
227.3
13.76
5.44
28.1
1045.9
15.66
3.73
11:11
192.6
225.3
12.79
6.14
26.2
1008.3
14.98
4.24
11:12
20B.2
226.7
11.85
6.74
25.3
911.6
14.22
4.77
11:13
220.9
221.0
11.51
6.99
24.9
858.6
13.08
5.04
11:14
233.0
218.7
11.74
6.85
24.6
027.0
13.78
5.21
11:15
239.3
221.6
11.80
6.92
24.5
876.1
14.11
5.00
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
11:15 189.7 227.0 13.59
5.48
33.0 1058.9
15.27'
4.05
11:16
249.9
217.3
11.48
7.19
24.4
863.9
13.92
5.15
11:17
264.7
221.3
11.11
7.59
24.1
838.6
13.67
5.34
11:18
282.5
229.7
10.77
7.02
23.2
821.9
13.42
5,50
11:19
295.4
230.9
11.50
7.37
22.1
795.1
13.63
5.52
11:20
292.2
229.1
11.37
7.47
21,9
794.4
13.02
5.37
11:21
293.1
222.3
11.48
7.39
21.8
804.4
13.77
5.38
11:22
294.8
225.3
11.30
7.58
21,7
776.8
13.76
5.43
11:23
300.5
217.0
11.24
7,60
20.6
748.1
13.54
5.57
11:24
303.2
223.1
11.10
7.77
20.0
723.0
13.50
5.63
11:25
304.2
210.8
11.11
7.72
19.5
699.0
13.44
5.65
11:26
306.3
224.7
10.94
7.93
18.7
673.1
13.32
5.77
11:27
309.9
219.1
10.99
7.83
18.0
649.8
13,26
5.81
11:26
304.3
219.2
11.30
7.56
18.3
670.4
13.37
5.76
11:2*
290.2
212.8
11.75
7.14
18.6
663.7
13.73
5.47
11:30
280.3
210.5
11.66
7.22
18.1
661.0
13.84
5.36
AVERA3E VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
11:30 291.4 221.4 11,27 7.54
20.7
745.6
13.60
5.51
11:31
231.8
202.9
11.33
7.44
19.7
697.5
13.63
5.46
11:32
282.3
196.7
11.65
7.15
20.3
B26.3
13.71
5.40
11:33
274.3
196.8
11.91
6.92
22.0
891.4
13.85
5.29
E-69
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludje ln:ir>eraor
06-04-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
CHAN 4
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
TIME
ooiS02
dobNQx
I 02
X C02
ddsTHC
DC* CO
I 32
I :02
11:34
267.0
195.3
12.33
6.63
21.6
900.3
14.16
5.07
11:35
257.7
194.4
12.45
6.53
22.5
926.B
14.36
4.93
11:36
252.8
189.8
12.70
6.35
22.6
926.4
14.47
4.82
11:37
245.6
189.9
12.82
6.25
23.7
976.8
14.61
4.70
11:38
240.1
187.7
13.04
6.07
23.8
977.1
14.72
4.59
11:39
" 232.9
187.1
13.30
5.B9
24.9
1006.0
14.92
4.*7
11:40
226.1
184.7
13.73
5.54
26.6
1091.1
15.31
4.15
11:41
223.6
185.2
13.73
5.58
2B.3
1163.9
15.43
4.06
11:42
221.7
179.8
14.00
5.30
30.1
1171.9
15.53
3.94
11:43
223.2
182.4
14.00
5.35
32.6
1243.5
15.63
3.90
11:44
221.6
179.3
14.14
5.16
34.0
1282.7
15.66
3.B1
11:45
218.6
181.2
14.28
5.11
37.1
1335.3
15.79
3.74
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
11:45
244.6
188.9
13.03
6.09
26.0
' 1027.8
14.79
4.56
11:46
216.8
179.0
14.51
4.84
38.8
1396.81
15.38
3.61
11:47
214.0
160-6
14.86
4.61
43.7
1473.91
16.16
3.42
11:48
211.6
179.5
15.19
4.28
43.8
1540.61
16.39
3.20
11:49
207.3
176.0
15.36
4.19
56.1
1556.21
16.59
3.08
11:50
206.4
170.7
15.50
4.06
59.5
1576.41
16.69
2.96
11:51
201.5
165.2
15.69
3.91
66.6
1605.61
16.79
2.87
11:52
197.3
159.6
15.82
3.B1
71.1
1615.21
16.95
2.75
11:53
194.fi
153.8
15.99
3.65
72.6
1577.BJ
17.03
2.69
11:54
186.6
149.3
16.15
3.53
76.6
1605.81
17.20
2.59
11:55
179.3
145.9
16.38
3.31
76.9
1615.Bl
17.33
2.47
11: 5o
167.6
139.7
16.61
3.12
79.8
1623-21
17.51
2.36
11:57
156.4
132.0
16.79
2.96
82.3
1622.21
17.66
2.22
11:59
146.7
125.3
16.96
2.81
84. B
1607.81
17.80
2.12
11:5?
136.2
125.6
16.69
2,95
93.3
1623.71
17.73
2.12
12:00
125.5
124.2
16.51
2.98
97.9
1675.1)
17.42
2.25
AVERAGE VALUES FOR
THE LAST
15 MINUTES
12:00
133.2
153.7
15.93
3.67
69.9
1581.1
17.01
2.71
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 60 MINUTES OF VALID DATA
12:00
227.2
197.7
13.46
5.69
37.4
1103.3
15.17
4.21
12:01
113.1
120.3
16.65
2.84
96.6
1635.81
17.47
2.20
12:02
105.4
116.1
16.72
2.79
101.3
161B.lt
17.51
2.16
12:03
99.4
119.3
16.70
2.78
110,7
1669.2t
17.57
2.13
12:04
96.6
121,5
16.55
2.93
114.7
1677.5*
17.49
2.15
12:05
100.8
128.6
15.91
3.35
113.9
1706.61
17.10
2.35
12:0a
112.5
144.0
15.31
3.78
109.6
1B03.3I
16.75
2.54
12:07
130.2
154.5
14.9B
4.02
102.5
1872.81
16.35
2.61
E-70
-------
Site 9 Sewge Sludce Incineraor 06-44-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CKAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
CHAN 4
BOILER
9QILE1
BOILER
BGILER
STUCK
STACK
STACK
STACK
TIME
DO1S02
sdiNO*
I 02
I C02
ddiTHC
031 CO
I 02
t C02
12:10
183.2
178.8
13.99
4.80
75.3
1875.51
15.57
3.44
12:1!
192.8
181.5
13.85
4.87
74.7
1375.51
15.57
3.43
12:12
196.6
183.7
13.83
4.86
74.4
1375.51
15.48
3.50
12:13
199.4
183.1
13.72
4.99
73.2
1375.51
15.49
3.50
12:14
Z06.8
182.9
13.63
5.00
74.1
1375.51
15.33
3.62
12:15
214.6
183.0
13.30
5.37
73.0
1375.51
15.26
3.71
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 6 HINUTES OF VALID DATA
12:15 198.9 182.2 13.73 5.00 74.3 1875.5
15.45
3.53
12:16
226.3
162.0
13.20
5.45
70.0
1B75.5I
15.02
3.87
12:17
235.1
181.2
12.84
5.32
68.5
1875.51
14.91
4.04
12:18
248.2
180.3
12.40
6.04
66.0
1875.51
14.63
4.19
12:19
265.5
17B.2
12.13
6.39
66.5
1875.51
14.38
4,48
12:20
265.3
175.5
11.51
6.84
66.3
1875.51
14.03
4.70
12:21
314.3
172.6
10.93
7.44
69.9
1875.51
13.56
5,14
12:22
347.7
168.4
10.01
8.20
77.2
1873.51
13.17
5.47
12:23
390.1
165.7
9.38
8.80
10C.O
1875.01
12.48
5.99
12:24
436.9
164.6
8.34
9.54
139.9
1875.51
12.01
6.37
12:25
483.1
172.8
7.90
9.86
250.3
1B75.51
11.42
6.75
12:26
510.7
164.2
7.17
10.40
326,0
1B75.51
11.15
7.00
12:27
529.5
206.6
7.04
10.65
443.0
1875.51
10.99
7.17
12:28
547.3
226.0
6.16
11.37
622.0
1875.51
10.61
7.43
12:29
555.8
250.9
5.40
12.00
939.81
IB75.51
10.11
7.79
12:30
536.6
279.5
4.65
12.66
1000.21
1075.5*
9.66 .
8.17
AVERAGE VALUES FCR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
12:30 394.2 192.6 9.20
1.76
2B7.0 1875.3
12.55
5.90
12:31
454.6
361.4
4.95
12.33
995.11
1875.51
9.26
8.54
12:32
482.4
361.7
6.06
11.65
465.1
1875.51
10.01
8.11
12:33
560.7
296.2
6.5B
11.61
137.5
1826.81
10.27
3.10
12:3*
599.5
257.6
6.74
11.60
60.5
1113.81
10.46
7.99
12:35
603.5
253.5
6.86
11.50
45.6
804.6
10.07
8.40
12:3b
591.3
260.2
7.59
10.82
35.6
854,8
10.34
8.25
12:37
510.2
302.7
9.92
8.86
29.5
670.3
11.61
7.31
12:36
399.3
290.9
11.71
7.20
28.5
767,4
13.14
6.OB
12:39
303.5
265.0
13.19
6.08
28.9
882.1
14.64
4.85
12:40
239.4
225.7
14.36
5,03
28.9
928.5
15.35
4.IB
12:41
197.9
201.2
15.14
4.39
31.2
1011.1
16.12
3.51
12:42
169.3
187.4
15.59
4.01
32.8
1086,7
16.60
3,06
12:43
153.7
181,2
15.90
3.82
34.8
1196.4
16.89
2.84
12:44
143.7
175.3
16.18
3.55
37.4
1312.6
17.10
2,68
12:45
134.8
173,5
16.51
3.25
43.1
1420.81
17.35
2.46
AVERAGE
VALUES
FCR THE LAST
15 MfiJTES
12:45
372.3
252.9
11.15
7.71
135.6
1175.1
13.20
5.76
12:4e
129.5
170.0
16.77
3.02
49.8
1492,31
17,57
2,31
12;47
124,3
165.4
16.97
2.B6
57.1
1493.Bt
17.75
2.18
12:46
122.6
157.9
17.10
2.68
103.9
1471.11
17.36
2.08
12:49
117.8
149.8
17.28
2.53
72.3
1482.51
18.01
1.97
12:50
111.6
140.1
17.40
2.42
74.1
1420.4
18.10
1.91
12:51
106.4
136.6
16.98
2.69
77.5
1444.7
17.96
1,93
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incinersor 06-04-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 1
CHAN 8
CHANiO
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
CHAN 4
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ma?.
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
TIME
dosS02
oobNOx
I 02
1 C02
octTHC
oca CO
I 02
: C02
12:52
101.7
125.8
17.03
2.54
84.5
1446.B
17.80
1.96
12:53
94.3
112.5
17.31
2.29
86.2
1462.61
17.99
1.36
12:54
81.1
98.6
17.53
2.07
93.3
1444.41
IB.22
1.69
12:55
70.7
87.3
17.75
1.92
96.7
132B.B
18.35
1.59
12:56
60.5
80.2
17.82
1.87
90.3
1197.4
18.48
1.50
12:57
53.1
73.5
17.78
1.85
93.7
1137.3
18.35
1.5:
12:58
47.3
71.7
17.86
1.82
93.3
1099.0
18.39
1.50
12:59
42.3
68.8
17.95
1.75
91.0
1059.3
IB.47
1.44
13:00
37.0
67.8
17.83
1.7B
90.6
1007.3
IB.45
1,41
AVERAGE VALUES FOR
THE LAST
15 MINUTES
13:00
86.7
113.7
17.42
2.27
83.8
1332.7
IB.12
1.79
13:01
32.2
68.6
17.60
1.80
91.9
991.5
18.36
1.44
13:02
30.7
72.4
17.70
1.87
91.0
' 954.8
IB.34
1.46
13:03
33.3
78.2
17.45
2.01
92.6
966.5
18.15
1.57
13:04
40.0
84.7
17.25
2.20
92.8
997.3
IB.00
1.69
13:05
49.5
89.6
17.12
2.32
93.5
1042.0
17.84
1.82
13:06
61.1
97.6
16.79
2.63
93.9
1093.2
17.74
1.89
13:07
74.6
105.1
16.43
2.89
95.2
1227.8
17.38
2.14
13:08
85.3
103.3
16.74
2.64
97.4
1314.3
17.41
2.15
13:09
84.2
101.6
16.91
2.56
99.6
1297.1
17.67
1.99
13:10
83.3
100.8
16.89
2.56
95.2
1313.3
17.66
1.99
13:11
84.5
103.3
16.80
2.65
92.9
1336.0
17.58
2.04
13:12
86.5
99.9
16.84
2.61
90.6
1325.2
17.56
2.06
13:13
87.8
102.5
16.65
2.80
B9.3
1289.9
17.50
2.10
13:14
?5.0
106.9
16.26
3.15
06,1
1291.7
17,24
2.28
13:15
103.6
105.3
16.19
3.17
68.5
1319.5
17.14
2.35
AVERAGE VALUES FOR
: THE LAST
15 MINUTES
13:15
68.8
94.6
16.92
2.52
92.7
1184.C
17.70
1.93
AVERAGE VALUES FOR
THE LAST HOUR: 60 MINUTES OF VAlID DATA
13:15
230.5
163.5
13.69
5.32
149.B
1391.8
15.41
3,85
13:16
104.9
102.3
16.36
3.05
95.8
1329.1
17.23
2.32
13:17
100.6
98.2
16.39
3.00
91.3
1322.2
17.30
2.25
13:18
95.6
102.0
16.02
3.26
93.1
1220.7
17.05
2.36
13:19
95.0
107.5
15.79
3.38
87.4
1308.0
16.67
2.58
13:20
95.7
117.1
15.47
3.58
84.4
1444.21
16.67
2.55
13:21
98.6
118.1
15.53
3.52
88.0
1529.11
16.70
2.56
13:22
94.7
115.2
15.73
3.32
87.8
1574.11
16.82
2.46
COMMENTS: End of Run * 12:15-13:15 6/4/90
E-72
-------
CALIBRATION SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor
REASON: System cal after Run 4
DATE : 06-04-1990 TIME: 13:22 ~ 14:25
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
MONITOR
RESPONSE
o
6
7
7
a
8
10
10
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ppmSO.
ppmSO!
ppmNO:
ppmNO:
"/. 02
¦/. 02
7- C02
7. C02
o. 0
361 . 4
0.0
240 .0
0.00
12. 50
0.00
11.01
329
0. <
12.
0.
10.95
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
ppm CO
ppm CO
7. 02
7. 02
0.0
iai .2
o. o
1263.0
0.00
12.50
8.9
186. 1
4 . 2
1285.6
0.08
12.24
STACK
STACK
7. co:
7. co:
O . UU
11.01
-0.10
10.62
E-73
-------
o#^i_ X E«Rr<^i
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge
REASON: Second direct cal
DATE : 06-04-1990 TIME: 14:26 - 15:1
T X ON SUMMARY
Incineraor
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
MOW I TOR-
RESPONSE
BOILER
BOILER-
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ppmS02
pp(nS02
ppmS02
ppmS02
ppmNO^
ppmNOx
ppmNO«
•/. 02
X 02
*/. 02
0.0
218,0
218.0
361.4
0.0
240.0
475.0
0.00
12. 50
20.60
2. 7
218.4
203 . 0
357.3
0. 5
240.9
479.0
0.05
12. 50
20 . t>5
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
pprn fHC
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
"/. 02
"/. 02
"/. 02
0.0
181 .2
282.0
0.00
12.50
20.60
1.2
ISO. 8
282. 0
0.12
12. 50
20 . 51
STACK
STACK
STACK
¦/. C02
C02
>: co2
0.00
11 .01
17.46
o. 00
11 .00
17.74
E-74
-------
CAI X EcF**=%-T X OM SIJMMARV
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewace Sludge Incineraor
REASON: System cal before MM-5 Run
DATE : *<>6-04-1990 TIME: 15:14 - 15:46
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNIT!
GAS
VALUE
MONITOR
RESPONSE
BOILER
BOILER
ppmS02
ppmS02
0. 0
'¦61.4
3.9
34 3. 7
BCILER
BOILER
ppmNOx
ppmNOx
U. O
!40.0
0. 5
141.7
BOILER
BOILER
7. 02
7. 02
0.00
0.00
0.08
12. 52
STACK
STACK
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
V. O
181.2
3.0
181.2
STACK
STACK
"/. 02
7. 02
0.00
12. 50
0.09
12.47
STACK
STACK
*/. C02
V. C02
0.00
11.01
0.01
10.99
E-75
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor 06-04-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN e
CHAN1C
zm i
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
CHAN 4
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
TIME
dciS02
odiNOx
Z 02
I C02
ddiTHC
DOB CO
I 02
I CO 2
16:1c
273.9
174.0
13.27
5.96
71.4
1779.51
15.07
4.49
16:17
276.1
178.0
13.32
i,n
-o
CO
66.6
1732.41
14.90
4.70
16:18
2B1.4
183.0
12.98
6.24
64.6
1784.71
14.90
4.73
16:19
286.1
186.3
12.99
6.19
5B.0
1726.51
14.61
4.39
16:20
296.1
191.7
12.63
6.52
53.7
1743.21
14.56
5.03
16:21
306.fi
196.1
12.39
6.66
46.3
1691.01
14.22
5.20
16:22
318.8
197.6
12.04
7.03
40.B
1625.91
14.02
5.48
16:23
334.2
196.3
11.57
7.39
36.8
1562.61
13.71
5.64
16:24
354.5
194.3
11.10
7.91
33.9
1460.51
13.33
6.01
16:25
384.8
194.3
10.43
8.46
32.0
1295.41
12.93
6.30
16:26
419.8
196.6
9.97
8.89
30.1
1217.41
12.38
6.74
16:27
425.2
223.5
10.96
8.28
22, B
991.4
13.03
6.49
16:25
422.3
222.9
10.56
8.67.
20.4
809.4
12,B9
6.53
16:2?
453.5
226.0
9.45
9.58
18.5
700.5
12.44
6.B?
16:30
515.0
232.1
8.32
10.47
18.8
735.0
11.49
7.55
16:31
598.1
230.7
7.38
11.0?
25.8
1155.11
10.98
8.08
16:32
591.6
238.9
8.46
10.24
22.9
1047.81
11.68
7.58
14:33
52E.9
247.4
9.61
9.33
23.6
882.9
12.25
7.16
16:34
429.9
257.0
11.38
7.£3
16.2
616.0
13.40
6.32
16:35
345.4
234.8
12.86
6.55
14.8
579.8
14.37
5.53
16:3b
277.0
210.7
14.31
5.44
17.4
697.8
15.53
4.55
16:37
23C.3
184.9
15.16
4,72
20.2
851.5
16.23
3.S4
16:38
203.9
17E.4
15.43
4.48
22.4
925.6
16.62
3.44
16:39
206.6
178.2
15.14
4.77
21.1
914.7
16.41
3.62
16:40
207.6
178.5
15.38
4.52
23.5
1012.7
16.46
3.61
16:41
200.6
178.3
15.75
4.26
26.6
1163.5
16.71
3.43
16:42
192.3
177.1
15.86
4.14
32.9
1376.6
16.90
3.22
16:43
190.9
178.2
16.01
4.03
38.5
1514.61
17.00
3.14
16:44
192.1
178.5
15.32
4.40
38.9
1532.21
16.53
3.32
16:45
196.4
179.1
15.26
4.41
38.9
1492.81
16.26
3.57
AVcRh6E VALUES FOR THE LAST H3UR: 30 RINU7ES OF VALiD DATA
16:45 331.4 200.8 12.51 6.82 33.3 1224.6 14.39 5.24
16:46
199.6
178.6
15.18
4.46
45.5
1574.01
16.24
3.57
16:47
201.8
177.5
15.36
4.24
46.3
1650.51
16.32
3.46
16:48
200.5
175.2
15.51
4.16
53. B
1718.51
16.47
3.34
16:4?
198.1
173.5
15.65
3.99
56.2
1760.61
16.59
3.19
16:50
196.2
171.6
15.82
3.92
63.6
1826.71
16.73
3.10
16:51
191.9
167.4
15.95
3.75
68.3
1832.91
16.86
2.96
16:52
1B7.2
162.6
16.20
3.59
76.B
1868.81
17.00
2.87
16:53
1B0.9
158.6
16.30
3.46
85.6
1870.41
17.17
2.69
16:54
175.3
150.7
16.62
3.22
93.0
1871.91
17.32
2.62
16:55
164.0
144.9
16.75
3.09
99.7
1B66.3I
17.52
2.46
16:56
148.0
120.6
17.41
2.52
119.4
1373.71
17.81
2.28
16:57
127.5
116.5
17.05
2.80
134.3
1839.11
17.88
2.15
16:56
121.5
113.2
16.67
3.01
145.4
1338.11
17.57
2.30
16:59
118.6
117.5
16.43
3.13
150.0
1315.21
17.39
2.41
17:00
117.2
117.0
16.33
3.22
146.7
1340.41
17.29
2.45
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
17:00 168.5 149.7 16.22 3.51 92.4 1303.1 17.08 2.79
17:0; 120.2 124.5 16.24 3.33 148.7 1838.61 17.17 2.55
E-76
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraar
06-04-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
CHAN 4
BOILER
BCILEfl
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
Tilt
OC*S02
aciN'Ox
I 02
I C02
aoiTHC
oo* CO
I 02
Z C02
17:02
123.1
127. B
16.07
3.45
147.1
1830.51
17.21
2.53
17:03
124.7
120.8
16.16
3.35
144.7
1805.01
17.13
2.57
17:04
123.8
123.8
16.19
3.40
144.1
1781.41
17.13
2.61
17:05
131.9
144.0
15.36
4.01
143.1
1831.31
16.90
2.70
¦7:0i
:• 159.3
155.2
15.01
4.24
132.3
1875.5a
16.36
3.08
17:07
173.0
157.5
14.96
4.29
124.7
1875.51
16.28
3.20
17;C8
181.0
163.2
14.75
4.42
117.6
1875.51
16.20
3.25
17:09
191.5
166.7
14.67
4.48
109.1
1B73.5I
16.02
3.36
17:10
196.8
171.2
14.48
4.67
106.9
1B75.51
15.96
3.46
17:11
204.8
174.4
14.32
4.75
103.3
1B75.51
15.B4
3.55
17:12
210.0
177.3
14.31
4.80
99.7
1875.51
15.74
3.64
17:13
215.0
179.8
14.03
5.09
97.4
1875.5*
15.71
3.67
17:14
221.9
181.2
14.D7
4.99
93.4
1B75.5I
15.55
3.79
17:15
224.7
178.9
14.06
5.04
96.3
1875.51
15.52
3.90
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
17:15 173.5 156.4 14.98 4,
29
120.6 1856.1
16.31
3.19
17:16
222.1
164.8
14.44
4.75
136.4
1875.51
16.08
3.51
17:17
220.4
162.0
14.56
4.72
137.9
1875.51
16.01
3.50
17:18
220.3
166.3
14.31
4.97
136.8
1875.51
15,98
3.58
17:19
227.9
171.9
13.99
5.15
136.0
1875.51
15.78
3.70
17:20
237.6
174.5
13.93
5.28
132.6
1875.51
15.59
3.90
17:21
245.5
177.5
13.56
5.61
131.6
1875.51
15.47
4.01
17:22
258.9
180.7
13.27
5.79
130.6
1875.51
15.19
4.20
17:23
274.7
183.8
13.06
6.00
125.1
1875.51
15.01
4.45
17:24
283.5
183.6
12.81
6.20
121.1
1875.51
15.03
4.43
17:25
300.3
187.8
12.44
6.46
128.8
1875.51
14.53
4,76
17: 2e
323.3
191.0
11.86
6.96
135.4
1875.51
14.2B
5.05
17:27
349.7
195.8
11.24
7.41
159.1
1875.51
13.85
5.35
17:28
377.0
203.2
10.85
7.80
180.8
1875.51
13.46
5.68
17:29
400.4
200.B
10,16
8.38
209.0
1875.51
13.25
5.87
17:30
410.5
203.5
10.21
8.30
330.4
1875.51
12.98
6.06
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 HINUTES
17:30 290.1 183.1 12.71 6.25
155.4 1875.5
14.83
4.54
17:31
407.8
199.6
11.30
7.59
192.1
1875.51
13.59
5.81
17:32
38B.1
186.3
11.54
7.40
193.0
1875.51
14.13
5.34
17:33
385.7
182.4
11.53
7.45
219.5
1875.51
14.03
5.40
17:34
394,4
179.5
11.45
7.52
239.1
1875.51
14.09
5.39
17:35
392.B
184.9
11.5B
7.33
318.5
1875.51
14.09
5.33
17:36
387.6
188.3
11.61
7.38
289.5
1875.51
14.13
5.36
17:37
3B1.2
188.6
11.53
7.42
259.3
1B75.5I
14.17
5.32
17:38
372.4
188.2
11.95
7.18
222.8
1875.51
14.08
5.37
17:39
377.6
185.2
11,40
7.67
166.9
1875.51
14.05
5.46
17:40
387.8
182.5
11.44
7.62
134.4
1875.51
14.07
5.46
17:41
386.5
181.3
11.56
7.53
111.2
1875.51
14.04
5.53
17:42
381.0
176.8
11.91
7.42
97.3
1875.51
14.19
5.43
17:43
371.3
189.4
11.97
7.21
86.0
1864.B1
14.32
5.29
17:44
354.D
212.3
12.45
6.B5
77.9
1790.21
14.46
5.21
17:45
336.6
215.2
12.57
6.73
75.0
1766.91
14.69
5.03
E-77
-------
Site 9 Serfage Sludge Inanerior 06-04-1990
CKAN 6 CHAN 7 CHAN 3 CHAN1Q CHAfri 1 CHAN 2 CHAN 3 CHAH A
BOILER BOILER BOILER BOILER STACK STACK STACK STACK
TIME dmSD2 epiNOk I C2 I C02 pjiTHC ppt CO I 02 I CD2
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
17:45 3E0.4 189.4 11.71 7.35 176.8 1861.8 14.14 5.39
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 60 HINUTES Of VALID DATA
17:45 253.1 169.7 13.91 5.35 136.8 1349.1
15.5?
3.97
17:46
325.0
219.3
12.81
6.51
70.5
1703.61
14.72
5.03
17:47
308.5
225.9
13.24
6.2b
68.7
1685.lt
15.00
4.72
17:48
309.9
218.8
12.90
6.54
67.7
1668.61
14.90
4.E7
17:4^
311.8
221.8
13.05
6.35
53.1
1667.61
14.87
4.86
17:50
310.6
222.?
13.11
6.34
58.7
1657.9*
14.88
4.88
17:51
308.6
225.5
13.07
6.37
54.0
1701.91
14.97
4.79
17:52
313.1
221.2
12.99
6.41
45.6
1627.01
14.70
4.93
17:53
317.3
221.1
12.80
6.60
43.6
1603.31
14.77
4.98
17:54
321.4
216.1
12.87
6.45
43.5
1610.61
14.74
4.95
17:55
320.8
2C9.2
13.OB
6.36
52.9
1700.31
14.89
4,89
17:56
317.7
203.5
13.26
6.16
63.8
1734.41
15.14
4.64
17:57
313.6
197.2
13.52
5.99
69.1
1666.51
15.29
4.54
17:58
312.1
199.4
13.28
6.18
70.8
1679.11
15.35
4.44
17:59
319.0
198.7
12.87
6.39
65.8
1649.11
14.83
4.01
18:00
327.7
198.3
12.70
6.60
65.4
1631.31
14.80
4,90
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 HINUTES
18:00 315.8 213.3 13.04
6.37
60.2 1665.7
14.93
4.81
18:01
329.0
200.7
12.64
6.58
63.4
1565.01
14.73
4.90
18:92
326.8
200.6
12.84
6.52
61.7
1551.51
14.79
4.97
18:03
320.0
204.0
12.91
6.40
60.8
1525.81
14.92
4.SO
18:04
311.6
203.2
13.15
6.22
61.2
1516.01
14.99
4.77
18:05
301.9
205.7
13.19
6.20
61.4
1535.21
15.19
4.59
18:06
295.1
203.5
13.09
6.IB
61.8
1514.11
14.99
4.63
18:07
289.2
204.9
13.27
6.09
64.0
1561.81
15.14
4.60
18:08
283.6
207.3
13.24
6.07
62.0
1534.21
15.16
4.52
18:09
282.1
208.9
13.38
6.02
62.5
1557.61
15.17
4.59
18:10
278.8
210.6
13.34
6.00
64.1
1584.91
15.28
4.45
18:11
279.6
207.8
13.47
5.90
63.4
1547.81
15.21
4.51
18:12
280.6
210.5
13.37
6.00
65.8
1606.91
15.27
4.47
18:13
276.9
206.0
13.55
5.83
63.4
1554.81
15.20
4.42
18:14
265.9
190.2
14.06
5.43
65.2
1596.21
15.32
4.42
18:15
270.6
209.1
13.45
5.93
63.9
1605.91
15.29
4.41
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 HINUTES
18:15 292.8 205.4 13.26
6.09
63.0 1557.2
15.12
4.61
18:16
276.7
204.5
13.58
5.80
62.0
1580.61
15.28
4.45
10:17
278.1
207.7
13,47
5.92
62.5
1613.91
15.31
4.40
19: 1&
281.3
205.1
13.45
5.91
60.2
1550.01
15.24
4.46
19:19
2&4.1
205.5
13.43
5.98
59.4
1608.31
15.23
4.52
18:20
205.1
206.2
13.43
5.92
58.6
1566.91
15.21
4.47
18:21
284.7
205.8
13.46
5.91
59.1
1584.71
15.24
4.51
10:22
26? .0
207.2
13.23
6.11
59.3
1599.91
15.25
4.47
19:23
289.9
203.1
13.49
5.85
59.2
1564.91
15.20
4.53
13:24
263.4
204.1
13.43
5.94
61.1
1611.71
15.34
4.42
E-78
-------
Site 9 Sewaje Sludce Incineracr 06-04-1990
CHAN 6
CHAM 7
CHAN 8
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
CHAN 4
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
TIKE
cd»302
DCiNOx
I 02
I C02
sorTHC
301 CO
I C2
I CC2
18:25
286.9
202.1
13.40
5.93
60.6
1549.61
15.22
4.45
18:26
289.7
201.0
13.48
5.93
60.0
1560.31
15.25
4.43
18:2?
289.6
201.0
13.47
5.90
60.2
1504.01
15.28
4.44
18:26
289.3
199.3
13.44
5.93
59.6
1502.11
15.19
4.56
18:29
293.6
204.9
13.26
6.10
60.0
1489.11
15.20
4.54
18:30
297.4
202.1
13.27
6.06
59.3
1415.21
15.10
4.63
AVERAGE VAL'JES FOR THE LAS!
19:30 286.5 204.0
15 KINUTES
13.42 5.95
60.1
1553.4
15.23
4.49
18:31
292.6
202.2
13.49
5.93
61.1
1471.81
15.26
4.50
18:32
287.1
203.2
13.51
5.38
60.3
1413.51
15.32
4.41
18:33
283.0
199.2
13.72
5.75
61.7
1414.01
15.42
4.38
18:34
276.5
201.3
13.81
5.66
60.9
1413.31
15.5B
4.23
18:35
271.2
196.3
13.91
5.56
61.3
1366.21
15.57
4.21
18:3c
273.0
198.0
13.78
5.72
62.9
HOB.21
15.59
4.21
18:37
274.4
195.1
13.84
5.64
60.6
1325.7
15.53
4.21
18:38
272.6
194.2
13.83
5.68
60.3
1328.1
15.51
. 4.27
1B:39
277.2
196.8
13.69
5.77
59.1
1333.2
15.53
4.26
18:40
281.5
191.9
13.58
5.36
57.8
1270.2
15.33
4.39
19:41
292.8
192.8
13.35
6.07
57.6
1296.3
15.15
4.53
13:42
299.3
200.0
13.25
6.16
56.9
1359.Bl
15.17
4.56
18:43
302.6
200.4
13.15
6.21
57.0
1351.31
15.04
4.72
18:44
314.2
204.4
12.75
6.60
50.1
1342.2
14.76
4.90
18:45
351.7
200.4
11.2B
7.91
42.7
1198.5
13.97
5.53
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 HiNUTES
1B:45 290.0 198.4 13.40
6.03
58.0 1352.8
15.25
4.4?
AVERA6E VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 60 MINUTES OF VALID DATA
18:45 296.3 205.3 13.28 6.11 60.3 1532.3 15.13 4.6D
18:46
385.4
205.1
11.80
7.27
45.0
1244.0
13.73
5.75
18:47
383.5
196.4
11.07
7.95
48.9
1173.9
13.85
5.63
18:46
403.8
198.5
11.08
7.99
45.3
1082.7
13.70
5.82
18:49
447.2
177.3
9.38
9.40
41.8
1195.3
12.77
6.41
18: SC
484.7
216.7
9.85
8.95
33.4
989.5
12.58
6.73
18:51
426.4
227.3
11.44
7.59
31.6
934.4
13.50
6.09
18:52
347.2
208.2
13.61
5.96
36.0
1069.9
15.14
4.87
18:53
283.9
194.1
14.61
5.20
39.4
1175.0
15.95
4.07
1B:54
253.5
187.1
15.18
4.74
43.3
1248.6
16.35
3.78
18:55
236.3
187.0
15.46
4.53
47.6
1371.2!
16.72
3.43
18:56
225.7
186.1
15.69
4.32
49.9
1415.91
16.82
3.28
18:57
223.5
186.0
15.91
4.15
53.8
1440.41
16.95
3.23
IB: 58
217.3
185.4
16.06
4.06
60.6
1565.11
17.14
3.05
18:59
211.1
181.8
16.21
3,90
63.1
1623.41
17.23
2.92
19:00
209.0
178.8
16.37
3.78
69.2
1663.41
17.34
2.87
AVERA6E VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 HINUTES
19:00
315.9
194.4
13.58
5.99
47.2
1279.5
15.32
4.53
19:01
210.1
183.8
15.67
4.20
76.8
1789.81
16.92
3.04
19:02
21B.0
137.5
15.34
4.34
78. S
1870.81
16.43
3.41
19:03
217.2
187.0
15.41
4.28
79.B
1875.5!
16.44
3.37
E-79
-------
Site 9 Senate Sludqe Incineraor 06-04-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
C.HAN 8
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2 '
CHAN 3
CHAH 4
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
8CILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
TIME
dsiS02
osaNOx
X 02
X CQ2
od«THC
cot CG
X 02
X CD2
19:04
216.2
1B5.3
15.41
4.26
B4.5
1875.51
16.50
3.33
19:05
211.6
184.3
15.57
4.13
90.6
1875.51
16.61
3.2*
19:06
203.5
179.0
15.90
3.69
100.C
1375.5*
16.79
3.07
19:07
192.0
177.1
16.05
3.78
108.2
I875.5X
17.01
2.91
I9:0&
185.9
172.0
16.27
3.57
113.7
1875.51
17.13
2.81
19:09
177.7
168.9
16.38
3.53
124.4
1875.5*
17.29
2.68
19:10
175.2
180.5
15.90
3.77
114.1
1875.5*
17.03
2.78
19:11
174.8
178.3
15.9B
3.70
114.8
1B75.51
16.99
2.83
19:12
168.0
175.2
16.15
3.59
122.4
1B75.5*
17.11
2.75
19:13
159.4
168.9
16.22
3.52
122.9
1875.5*
17.21
2.68
19:14
151.6
164.8
16.33
3.41
127.3
1875,5*
17.24
2.63
19:15
148.8
164.2
16.31
3.46
132.4
1875.5*
17.22
2.67
AVERAGE
VALUES
FDR THE LAST
15 HINJTES
19:15
187.3
177.1
15.92
3.33
106.0
1069.4
16.93
2.95
19:1b
148.9
168.5
16.09
3.64
127.3
1875.5*
17.17
2.69
19:17
150.6
166.7
16.07
3.61
126.1
1875.5*
17.00
2.79
19:18
153.2
159.4
16.36
3.53
120.8
1856.7*
17.35
2.70
19:19
154.7
159.7
16.15
3.69
118.2
1831.8*
17.34
2.65
19:20
157.3
159.2
16.26
3.57
114.1
1803.B*
17.24
2.72
COMEKTS: End of Run 7A - 17:15-19:15
E-80
-------
i x OM summary
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incirteraor
REASON: System c;al after Run 7A
DATE : 06-04-1990 TIME: 19:22 - 19:54
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
MONITDR
RESPONSE
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ppmSG2
ppmS02
ppmS02
0. o
~61 .4
:.ol .4
381.0
361 .9
BOILER
BOILER
ppmNOx
ppmNQ:<
u. u
240.0
2.1
242.3
BOILER
E<01LER
•/. o:
*/. o:
0.00
12. 30
0.06
12.71
10
10
BOILER
BOILER
*/. C02
*/. C02
0.00
11.01
0 .05
10.98
STACK
STACK
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
0.0
181.2
10.7
133.7
STACK
STACK
p p.Tl CO
ppm CO
O. O
1263.0
1.5
1284.3
STACK
STACK
7. 02
7. 02
0 .00
12. 50
0.0 9
J 7 . 60
STACK
STACK
co:
y. co:
o. oo
11.01
0 .0 5
11.0 5
E-81
-------
CALIBRATION SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor
REASON: System cal after Run 18:45—22:00
DATE 06-02-1990 TIME: 22:05 - 22:33
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
MONITOR
RESPONSE
BOILER
BOILER
ppmS02
ppnS02
(!) - 0
218.0
io.:
BOILER
BOILER
ppmNO;-;
ppmNOx
0.0
!40.0
1.2
'40 .9
BOILER
BOILER
7. 02
7. 02
0.00
12. 50
0 .09
10
10
BOILER
BOILER
7. C02
7. C02
0. 00
11.01
0.0 5
10.92
STACK
STACK
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
o.o
181 .2
177.
STACK
STACK
ppm CO
ppm CO
0.0
1263.0
1.3
1268.9
STACK
STACK
7. 02
7. 02
0.00
12. 50
0.08
12. 30
E-82
-------
Siti 9 Senaqe Sludge Incmsrior C6-D2-19SC
CHAM 6
zm 7
CHAN 8
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
8CILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
stack
STACK
STACK
TIKE
OCtS02
ddiNOx
I 02
I CG2
cmTHC
:si CO
; 02
18; 42
359.1
160.1
11.38
7.66
15.7
590. a
H.28
18:43
454.9
155.3
10.27
8.61
20.2
626.0
13.24
1S:4*
496.2
le5.9
10.43
8.57
15.1
545.3
13.30
18:45
498.7
172.4
10.77
8.17
11.2
<75.9
13.31
4VERA3E
VALUES FOR
'HE LAST t
OR:
4 WJTE3 :f
.AL!D DATA
13:45
452.2
le3.4
10.71
3.25
15.5
559.5
13.51
IS: 4c
424.8
le0.9
12.30
6.71
11.3
4bc.7
14.22
ifi:47
331.0
148.0
13.37
5.51
13.5
540.4
15.3:
IS ;4&
263.3
142.1
14.31
4.69
16.3
676.2
16.10
18:49
224.8
141.5
15.45
4.13
21.)
396.7
16.56
18:50
209.7
144.1
15.57
Ml
25.3 .
1032.9
16,78
18:51
202.1
144.9
15.36
3.83
30.6
1148.6
16.92
18:52
200.2
145.1
15.82
3.96
34.3
1229.0
17.04
18:53
203.4
143.8
15.41
4.0?
31.7
1143.8
16.71
18:54
2CI.6
140.4
15.53
4.04
35.7
1198.4
16.78
18:55
200.2
138.7
15.53
3.96
37.6
1253.9
16.81
18:56
198.0
137.6
15.63
3.92
40.0
1265.4
16.90
18:57
197.6
135.6
15.34
4.10
40.0
1276.7
16.74
18:58
197.9
132.7
15.31
4.C3
41.1
1248.3
16.6:
13:59
193.4
13C.6
15.44
3.93
44.0
1333.6
16.72
19;00
187.5
127.9
15.65
3.73
43.0
1369.7
16.34
mmt values f:r the last 15 minutes
19:03 229.0 UC.9 15.17 4.33 31.4 1072.0 16.47
1?:C1 130.6 124.2 15.85 3.66 52.3 1408.4 16.98
19:02 177.7 123.9 15.62 3.64 53.6 1414.5 17.02
19:03 176.2 122.0 i5.S3 3.40 53.5 1390.1 1J.00
1409.2 17.10
19:C* 174.2 119.B 16.04 3.44 56.5
19:C5 168.2 120.1 16.1? 3.34 53.5 1419.71 17.22
17.31
17.25
17.53
17.55
68.8 1411.8 17.47
1163.8 121.5 16.24 3.30 61.8 1465.81
19:07 164.2 116.6 16.31 3.13 62.6 1457.31
19:03 151.9 113.2 15.69 2.92 71.4 1506.01
i-v? 145.9 16.73 2.90 69.2 1426.01
19:10 143.7 113.7 1A.A2 ?.97
•?;il 145.2 114.5 16.58 3.03 67.3 1334.0 17.42
l?sl2 150.3 122.0 16.24 3.34 62.6 1324.1 17.15
162.6 127.9 15.62 3.69 52.8 1244.7 16.63
19:14 176.2 127.7 15.34 3,91 47.4 1215.0 16.45
19:15 92.7 9.4 15.65 4.04 43.2 1165.2 16.24
AVERA6E VAliiES FCR IHE LAST 15 HINUTES
19:15 156.3 112.9 16.11 3.40 58.8 1372.9 17.09
19:16
13.2
2.0
15.76
4.02
42.1
1133.2
16.04
19:17
C 1
1.7
15.73
4.03
39.5
1118.4
15.39
19:13
4.0
1.7
15.75
4.04
37.4
1058.2
15.73
19:1?
3.5
1.6
( ^
or>
fsj
4.02
36.9
1076.6
15.61
19:20
3.6
1.6
CO
>
4.02
35.8
1008.0
15.45
19:21
v.l
1.5
15.80
4.03
35.2
992.9
15.29
19:22
2.?
1.5
15.80
4.03
34.3
927.0
15.12
19:2!
2.7
1.5
15.83
4.01
34.4
914.5
14.97
E-83
-------
Site 9
Setuge 3
ludoe Incineraor
06-02-199
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
:hanio
CHAN 1
CMN 2
CHAN 3
BOILER
3QILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
V.tt
odiSG2
D5»N0x
: 02
1 C32
os«THC
o:a CD
I C2
19:24
2.5
1.5
15.81
4.C2
37.3
1045.3
15.55
19:25
3.9
21.2
17.32
2.87
43.2
1235.9
16.46
19:2o
21.2
4.2
20.68
0.12
47.0
1337.:
16.62
19:27
6.8
2.7
20.71
0.10
47.7
1323.3
16.72
19:26
3.7
2.1
20.67
0.16
39.1
1123.1
16.15
19:29
33.7
77.3
16.74
3.34
37.3
1062.8
15.93
19:30
174.4
119.6
14.46
4.86
36.?
1073.2
15.83
AVERASE VA.L'ES
¦OR ThE LAST
15 MlhUTES
19:30
19.6
16.1
16.85
3.18
39.0
1095.7
15.33
19:31
204.5
126.6
14.25
5.03
36.3
10C1.2
15.72
19:32
214,6
124.4
14.06
5.21
36.1
1014.2
15.55
19:31
222,5
122.7
13.86
5.38
35.7
966.2
15.42
19:34
227.2
121.9
13.95
5.41
35.7 '
958.7
15.35
19:3;
220.3
126.4
13.73
5.44
35.6
934.0
15.29
;9:3c
222.5
122.9
13.64
5.53
36.0
95*.3
15.25
19:37
233.3
122.0
13.51
5.63
15.3
921.0
15.14
19:38
242.2
121.2
13.35
5.78
35.2
904.5
15.06
19:39
253.3
119.1
13.19
5.90
34.6
987.7
14.92
19:40
2£4.6
113.5
13.03
6.03
34.0
853.6
14.37
19:41
274.4
113.4
12.92
6.13
33.7
874.2
14.75
19:42
287.4
117.7
12.49
6.48
32.7
835.1
14.56
19:43
313.4
117.6
12.01
6.84
31.7
B40.9
14.22
19:44
333. C
118.1
11.63
7.16
29.7
792.4
13.98
19:45
364.S
116.1
11.10
7.66
29.2
913.1
13.63
AVERAGE
VALUES
FOR ThE LAST
15 MINUTES
19:45
259.0
120.9
13.11
5.57
34.1
903.8
14.92
AVERAGE VALUES FCR THE LAST HOUR: 60 MINUTES CF VALID DATA
19:45 164,5 97.7 15.31 4.22 40.9 1111.9 16.08
19:46
401.2
113.7
10.65
8.12
23.2
317.9
13.34
19:47
433.2
108.1
10.07
8.57
27.3
365.5
13.01
19:48
466.5
106.5
9.69
6.88
27.8
932.2
12.62
19:49
478.6
111.5
9.63
8.89
29.3
953.2
12.57
19:50
464.7
119.1
9.95
8.64
30.1
1017.8
12.63
19:51
442.9
125.7
10.33
8.29
28.2
958.7
12.93
19:52
413.3
128.0
11.10
7.76
24.1
348.4
13.35
19:53
393.5
127.4
11.23
7.72
22.3
756.4
13.53
19:54
389.2
124.5
11.15
7.76
20.4
752.9
13.47
19:55
404 .7
120.6
10.75
8.17
20.8
766.3
13.25
19:56
433.6
118.1
10.46
8.37
27.9
377.2
12.90
19:57
437.0
127.0
11.18
7.83
22,6
743.5
13.U
19:58
405.6
128.7
11.64
7.44
16.5
598.8
13.63
19:59
376.7
132.0
12.04
7.09
14.9
550.4
13.94
20:00
348.1
130.8
12.55
6.65
14.2
541.1
14.25
AVERAGE
VALJES FOR ThE LAST 15 MIN'JTES
20:00
419.2
121.4
10.33
3.01
23.6
798.8
13.24
20:01
3C9.6
129.9
13.38
5.96
15.2
550.7
14.79
20:02
260.2
124.5
14.37
5.16
16.9
600.7
15.58
E-84
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Irci.ieraor
06-02-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
TIftE
oo«3C2
oosS'Ox
Z 32
I C02
coaTHC
co* CO
I 02
20:03
223.0
122.1
14.65
4.90
18.5
680.2
15.99
20:04
204.4
120.1
14.70
4.BO
19.0
686.2
15.97
20:05
194.1
117.6
14.45
4.92
19.4
683.9
15.94
20:06
169.2
117.8
14.48
4.85
19.3
670.6
15.91
20:07.^
187.3
116.1
14.60
4.74
19.8
690.0
15.98
20:08'
182.4
115.1
14.73
4.59
21.4
739.4
16.H
20:09
176.8
113.6
14.96
4.42
23.2
774.8
16.24
20:10
175.2
113.1
14.96
4.42
24.8
799.1
16.33
20:11
177.6
113.0
15.04
4.33
26.2
813.3
16.33
20:12
179.3
113.1
15.03
4.35
28.4
862.1
16.41
20:13
176.8
112.6
15.27
4.14
30.7
917.1
16.49
20:14
172.7
112.5
15.47
4.01
34.5
983.5
16.66
20:15
165.9
112.1
15.62
3.87
37.5
1025.1
16.74
mmz
VALUES FOR THE LAST
15 KIKU7ES
20:15
19B.3
116.9
14.78
4.63
23.6
766.3
16.10
20:16
164.2
111.6
15.70
3.80
40.1
1079.4
16.82
20:17
163.6
111.7
15.70
3.77
42.1
1121.3
16.87
20:18
162.0
111.2
15.87
3.64
44.9
1187.1
16.93
20:19
157.7
110.5
15.94
3.58
47.7
1260.5
17.01
20:20
153.8
109.6
15.80
3.66
49.6
1312.9
16.98
20:21
153.5
100.9
15.52
3.81
46.5
1236.5
16.71
20:22
155.1
109.2
15.50
3.81
46.5
1212.3
16.66
20:23
156.9
108.6
15.51
3.82
46,4
1200.7
16.66
20:24
155.4
10B.0
15.64
3.69
48.6
1247.6
16.73
20:25
152.2
100.6
15.65
3.70
50.6
1273.3
16.78
20:26
152.0
108.5
15.59
3.75
50.7
1273.4
16.73
20:27
155.4
109.6
15.50
3.03
50.1
1236.6
16.71
20:28
160.3
110.9
15.3*
3.94
50.3
1214.6
16.63
20:29
168.8
111.2
15.05
4.15
47.9
1123.5
16.43
20:30
l£0.6
112.0
14.80
4.34
44.6
1047.3
'16.22
AVERA6E VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 KINJTES
20:30 159.4 UO.0 15.54 3.B2
47.1 1201.1
16.73
20:31
195.0
113.4
14.33
4.74
42.5
1007.0
15.95
20:32
215.7
115.7
13.B7
5.17
39.1
970.1
15.59
20:33
224.2
117.5
13.85
5.15
38.0
976.5
15.41
20:34
232.3
120.7
14.28
4.90
40.7
1045.7
15.90
20:35
229.8
122.2
14.31
4.82
42.7
1107.7
15.90
20:36
228.2
123.0
14.31
4.B7
42.8
1097.4
15.92
20:37
230.1
124.5
14.25
4.88
42.5
1102.3
15.87
20:36
231.*
124.6
14.20
4.99
43.2
1097.7
15.85
20:39
237.3
125.7
14.00
5.14
41.5
1093.2
15.6B
20:40
241.7
127.0
13.90
5.25
41.2
1079.2
15.62
20:41
245.2
127.9
13.80
5.30
39.6
1072.5
15.55
20:42
241.2
125.6
13.84
5.31
40.6
1091.2
15.53
20:43
244.7
125.7
13.65
5.46
40.2
1081.3
15.48
20:44
249.6
124.B
13.62
5.47
38.6
1064.5
15.40
20:45
253.2
125.2
13.44
5.63
38.1
1044.8
15.28
AVERAGE VALUES FOR
THE LAST
15 MINUTES
20:45
234.0
122.9
13.98
5.14
40.7
1062.1
15.66
-------
Site 9 Se*age Sludge Inctneraor 06-02-1990
Zm 6 CHAN 7 CHAN B CHAN10 CHAN 1 CHAN 2 CHAN 3
BOILER BOILER BOILER BOILER STACK STACK STACK
TIHE o;iSQ2 pdbNOx Z 02 I C02 ppiTHC po« CO I 02
AVERA6E VALUES FCR THE LAST HOUR: 60 MNL'TES OF VALID OATA
20:45 252.7 117.8 13,78 5.40 33.8 957.4 15.43
20:46
258.4
126.0
13.35
5.70
37.7
1041.7
15.21
20:47
? 263.7
126.7
13.27
5.78
30.4
1053.9
15.16
20:46
266.4
126.1
13.14
5.86
36.7
1013.1
15.07
20:4S
272.9
124.4
13.06
5.96
35.9
9B7.5
14.98
20:50
279.6
122.8
12.85
6.14
34.5
943.7
14. B8
20:51
2B9.6
120.8
12.70
6.28
34.4
941.8
14.75
20:52
297.3
120.7
12.57
6.34
33.0
907.2
14.65
20:53
298.8
120.4
12.52
6.40
32.2
373.9
14.55
20:54
306.5
118.4
12.34
6.53
31.6
36C.0
14.49
20:55
318.0
117.3
12. 14
6.71
30.1
824.5
14.34
20:56
326.3
116.9
11.94
6.89
29.3
- 811.1
14.24
20:57
334.9
120.7
12.29
6.60
27.5
782.5
14.28
20:53
317.2
124.7
12.71
6.36
27.1
844.8
14.66
20:5?
316.2
124.7
12.53
6.50
26.2
849.7
14.56
21:00
325.1
121.4
12.34
6.63
25.4
B25.0
14.37
AVERAGE VALUES FQfl THE LAST 15 H1NUTES
21:00 293.1 122.1 12.65
6.31
32.0
904.0
14.6B
21:01
331.4
121.0
12.42
6.57
25.2
831.0
14.38
21:02
315.7
122.2
12.90
6.IB
25.5
832-3
14.68
21:03
294.9
122.8
13.12
6.01
26.2
872.4
14.93
21:04
283.7
122.6
13.30
5.87
25.5
845.5
15.01
21:05
203.1
122.9
13.17
' 5.98
24.8
B44.5
14.99
21:06
293.2
121.8
12.91
6.20
23.2
791.9
14.B2
21:07
306.3
121.7
12.75
6.32
21.8
777.9
14.69
21:06
308.1
122.4
12.62
6.24
21.8
777.4
14.65
21:09
298.1
124.0
13.03
6.07
22.1
801.0
14.31
21:10
233.2
124.1
13.38
5.78
23.4
853.3
15.07
21:11
269.5
124.5
13.63
5.56
25.1
898.2
15.26
21:12
259.2
124.4
13.84
5.36
26. B
949.1
15.44
21:13
251.1
123.7
14.07
5.19
28.2
967.4
15.60
21:14
241.4
124.8
14.23
5.04
30.6
1014.8
15.72
21:15
242.5
123.1
14.16
5.10
29.8
901.9
15.71
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 HINUTES
21:15 284.1 123.1 13.32
5.83
25.3
869.2
15.05
21:16
245.7
122.6
14.16
5.12
31.2
1024.0
15.72
21:17
247.6
123.2
14.36
4.91
33.3
1046.3
15.78
21:18
239.6
126.5
15.06
4,39
45.6
1218.7
16.35
21:19
223.8
127.5
14.90
4.41
41.9
1200.7
16.25
21:20
209,9
127.6
15.19
4.18
45.3
1256.5
16.37
21:21
194.5
124.4
15.92
3.69
53.2
1284.2
16.87
21:22
180.6
114.5
16.44
3.32
60.7
1293.8
17.30
21:23
168.9
115.3
15.98
3.63
61.6
1306.0
17.21
21:24
176.5
115.7
15.30
4.02
57.0
1304.2
16.62
21:2!
182.5
116.3
15.24
4.08
54.1
1297.6
16.52
21:26
1B4.6
115.9
15.16
4,14
54.5
1293.7
16.49
21:27
190.8
115.4
¦5.05
*.21
59.4
1315.3
16.40
21:26
19V.7
120.6
14.86
4.34
62.1
1272.3
16.25
E-86
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludae Incineraor 06-02-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
TIME
ooe502
ddiNC-x
I 02
X C02
ddiTHC
DO* CO
I 02
21:29
207.4
121.4
15.09
4.20
66.9
1214.1
16.33
21:30
204.5
119.4
15.45
4.01
63.5
1230.0
16.60
AVERAGE
VALUES FOR THE LAST
15 HINUTES
21:30
.203.8
120.4
15.21
4.18
i)3.0
1237.2
16.47
21:31
199.6
120.1
15.49
3.96
65.6
1218.8
16.66
21:32
If?. 7
116.9
15.38
4.03
55.8
1281.7
16.52
21:33
199.1
115.5
15.53
3.91
59.2
1320,8
16.62
21:34
189.7
113.4
15.69
3.7?
59.4
1306.8
16.77
21:35
182.2
110.3
15.83
3.67
62.7
1286.7
16.91
21:36
176.5
108.6
15.90
3.66
61.8
1269.7
16.95
21:37
173.1
107.3
15.89
3.66
62.3
1273.3
16.96
21:38
171.1
108.6
15.99
3.58
60.0
1258.5
17.00
21:39
166.7
108.9
16.08
3.51
59.5
'1267.8
17.05
21:40
161.3
109.B
16.19
3.41
60.4
1317.6
17.11
21:41
155.1
108.4
16.28
3.35
60.6
1308.3
17.21
21:42
152.3
108.7
16.27
3.37
61.9
1334.1
17.19
21:43
151.7
109.2
16.24
3.39
60.6
1305.8
17.12
21:44
147.7
109.6
16.28
3.33
62.5
1346.4
17.19
21:45
145.5
113.9
16.10
3.51
61.2
1345.6
17.10
AVERfiSE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
21:45 171.4 ill.3 15.94 3.61 60.9 1296.3 16.76
AVERA6E VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 60 HINUTES OF VALID DATA
21:45 239.3 119.2 14.2B 4.98 42.8 1076.7 15.79
21:46
155.0
124. B
15.2?
4.05
54.9
1286.0
16.58
21:47
173.9
130.0
15.04
4.20
49.4
1224.4
16.27
21:48
184.2
132.3
14. B2
4.38
48.5
1225.1
16. IS
21:49
194.0
133.1
14.74
4.43
47.0
120?.2
16.02
21:50
202.1
134.5
14.43
4.72
45.9
1205.1
15.93
21:51
211.3
134.9
14.29
4.7?
45.3
1184.8
15.75
21:52
216.8
135.4
14.25
4.06
45.2
1175.0
15.70
21:53
219.7
133.5
14.21
4.87
45.B
1213.5
15.66
21:54
223.2
133.5
14.18
4.94
44.6
1132.0
15.61
21:55
225.9
133.8
14.07
5.01
44.8
1149.2
15.62
21:56
228.8
135.1
14.09
5.01
44.7
1139.7
15.54
21:57
229. B
135.0
13.89
5.18
45.5
1160.4
15.51
21:58
238.5
134.7
13.78
5.27
45.4
1150.1
15.34
21:59
245.4
136.9
13.62
5.43
45.6
1172.1
15.2?
22:00
257.7
132.5
13.04
5.91
45.2
1172.6
15.01
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST
15 MIKUTES
22:00
213.9
133.3
14.25
4.87
46.5
11B6.6
15.74
22:01
307.9
121.1
11.5?
6.9?
46.1
116?.6
13.87
22:02
371.9
117.7
10.88
7.58
65.4
1628.21
13.25
22:03
424.2
118.3
10.32
8.03
102.6
1829.81
12.Be
22:04
441.9
125.7
10.81
7.66
117.8
1814.11
12.97
22:05
421.4
124.1
10.86
7.6?
101.B
1767.51
13.23
COMMENTS: End of
Run - 19:54-22:00
(CONTINUED ON THE NEIT PA6E)
E-87
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sledge Incineraor 06-02-1990
CHAK 6 CHAN 7 CHAN 8 CHAN1Q CHAN 1 CHAN 2 CHAN 3
BOILER BOILER BOILER BOILER STACK STACK STACK
TIHE pptS32 ppaNPx I 02 I C02 p^t'HC ppi CO X 02
6/2/90
E-88
-------
L_ X BR.-^~r I OtNl SUMMARY
SOURCE: Si. te 9 Sewage Sludnt= Incineracr
REASON: Initial direct cal cf Oxygen an:Uy;:Ers
DATE 9 06-05-1990 TIME: 06:01 - 06:40
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
MONITOR
RESPONSE
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
*/. 02
7. 02
•/. 02
0.00
12. 50
20.60
0.06
!0 . 65
STACK
STACK
STACK
7. 02
"/. 02
7. 02
0.00
12. 50
20.60
0.11
12. 50
20.61
E-89
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor
06-05-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CHAN1C
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
CHAN 4
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
V.tt
oo»S02
ooaHOx
Z 02
Z C02
ooaTHC
DCI CO
I 02
X C02
0&:43
19.4
-1.0
16.86
2.28
-0.5
-2.7
16.31
0.15
06:4*
19.3
-1.0
16.87
2.27
-0.4
-2.7
16.79
0.15
06:4:
19.2
-1.0
16. £8
2.27
-0.3
-2.6
16.77
0.15
AVERAGE*"
VALUES FGR THE LAST
HOUR:
3 MINUTES OF VALID DATA
06:45
19.3
-1.0
16.87
2.28
-0.4
-2.7
16.79
0.15
06:46
19.3
-1.0
16.57
2.26
-0.4
-2.7
16.78
0.15
06:47
19.6
-1.0
16.81
2.31
-0.5
-2.7
16.59
0.15
06:46
19.3
-1.0
16.54
2.52
-0.5
-2.6
16.14
0.15
06:4^
19.4
-1.0
15.64
2.95
-0.5
-2.7
15.14
0.15
06:50
19.2
-1.0
15.67
3.03
-0.5
-2.4
14,97
0.15
06:51
19.6
-1.0
15.64
3.04
-0.5
-2.5
15.00
0.15
06:52
19.E
-1.0
15.65
3.03
-0.5 '
-2.4
14.90
0.15
0o:5o
19.4
-1.0
15.65
3.03
-0.5
-2.5
14.93
0,15
06:54
19.5
-1.0
15.65
3.03
-0.5
-2.5
14.94
0.15
06:55
19.5
-1.0
15.66
3.03
-0.5
-2.4
14.93
0.15
06:5c
19.1
-1.0
15.66
3.03
-0.4
-2.4
14.90
0.15
06:57
19.0
-1.0
15.65
3.03
-0.3
-2.2
14.99
0.15
06:58
19.2
-1.0
15.62
3.04
-0.4
-2.3
14.93
0.15
06:59
19.7
-1.0
15.63
3.03
-0.5
-2.3
14.94
0.15
07:00
19.6
-1.0
15.64
3.03
-0.4
-2.3
14.93
0.15
AVERAGE
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
07:00
19.4
-1.0
15.88
2.89
-0.5
-2.5
15.26
0.15
07:01
19.3
-1.0
15.64
3.02
-0.2
-2.3
14.98
0.15
07:02
19.5
-1.0
15.64
3.03
-0.7
-2.3
14.98
0.15
07:03
19.5
-1.0
15.63
3.03
0.9
-2.2
14.99
0.14
07:04
19.6
-1.0
15.65
3.02
0.4
-2.1
14.97
0.14
07:05
19.7
-1.0
15.63
3.03
-0.5
-2.3
14.98
0.14
07 :Oo
19.5
-1.0
15.64
3.02
-1.1
-2.0
14.94
0.15
07:07
19.1
-1.0
15.64
3.02
0.8
-2.1
15.00
0.14
07:08
19.3
-1.0
15.66
3.01
0.7
-2.0
14.96
0.14
07:09
19.5
-1.0
15.62
3.03
-0.7
-2.1
14.95
0.14
07:10
19.5
-1.0
15.65
3.01
0.7
-2.0
15.01
0.14
07:11
19.6
-1.0
15.62
3.03
0.5
-2.0
14.95
0.14
07:12
19.4
-1.0
15.59
3.04
-0.6
-2.0
14.95
0.15
07:13
19.3
-1.0
15.63
3.01
-0.2
-1.9
15.02
0.14
07:1*
19.9
-1.0
15.64
3.00
0.2
-2.0
15.03
0.14
07:15
19.8
-1.0
15.64
3.01
0.1
-2.0
15.03
0.14
AVERAGE
VALUES
m THE LAST
15 HINUTES
07:15
19.5
-1.0
15.64
3.02
0.0
-2.1
14.9B
0.14
07:16
19.7
-1.0
15.66
2.99
-0.0
-1.9
15.02
0,14
07:17
19.2
-1.0
15.66
2.99
0.3
-1.8
15.04
0.14
07:18
19.2
-1.0
15,69
2.97
0.4
-1.8
15.03
0.15
07:19
19.8
-1.0
15.68
2.97
-0.9
-1.8
15.09
0.14
07:20
19.a
-1.0
15.66
2.98
-0,4
-1.8
15.09
0.14
07:21
20.0
-1.0
15.68
2.97
-0.1
-1.8
15.12
0.15
07:22
19,6
-1.0
15.66
2.90
-0.1
-1.8
15.03
0.14
07:23
19.3
-1.0
15.68
2.90
0.4
-1.8
15.11
0.14
07:24
19.9
-1.0
15.67
2.98
1.2
-1.8
15.12
0.14
E-90
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Ir.cineraor 06-05-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN B
CHAftlO
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
CHAN 4
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
TIKE
go«S02
PCiNOx
I 05
I C02
ddiTHC
oos CO
I 02
i :o2
07:25
20.0
-1.0
15.68
2.97
-0.3
-i.B
15.08
0.14
07:2o
19.4
-1.0
15.69
2.96
1.1
-1.7
15.OB
0.14
07:27
19.7
-1.0
15.68
2.97
0.1
-l.B
15.09
0.14
07:26
19.B
-1.0
15.69
2.96
0.9
-l.B
15.12
0.14
07:2^
19.5
-1.0
15.69
2.96
-0.1
-l.B
15.11
0.14
07:30
19.0
-1.0
15.68
2.96
-0.2
-1.7
15.12
0.14
AVERABE VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
07:30
19.6
-1.0
15.68
2.97
0.2
-1.8
15.08
0.14
07:3!
19.5
-1.0
15.68
2.97
1.0
-1.6
15.05
0.14
07:32
19.4
-1.0
16.12
2.64
-1.3
-1.8
15.75
0.14
07:33
19.6
-1.0
16.84
2.21
-0.3
-1.8
16.74
0.14
07:34
19.5
-1.0
16.77
2.30
-0.8
-l.B
16.59
0.14
07:35
19.B
-i.O
15. BC
2.89
3.2 '
-1.8
15.22
0.14
07:3c
19.8
-l.C
15.75
2.91
0.6
-1.8
15.16
0.14
07:37
19.3
-l.C
15.76
2.90
0.6
-1.7
15.16
0.14
07:36
19.7
-1.0
15.75
2.90
0.1
-1.6
15.19
0.14
07:39
19.6
-1.0
15.77
2.89
0.3
-1.7
15.18
0.14
07:40
19.8
-0.9
15.75
2.90
0.1
-1.6
15.15
0.14
07:41
20.2
-1.0
15.74
2.89
-0.4
-1.5
15.18
0.14
07:42
20.3
-1.0
15.75
2.88
-1.2
-1.4
15.18
0.14
07:43
20.1
-1.0
15.76
2.88
1.2
-1.4
15.20
0.14
07:44
19.6
-0.9
15.77
2.88
-1.4
-1.5
15.25
0.14
07:45
19.9
-1.0
15.76
2.88
-0.2
-1.5
15.24
0.14
AVERAGE VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
07:45
19.7
-1.0
15.92
2.80
.-0.1
-1.6
15.42
0.14
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 60 MINUTES OF VALID DATA
07:45
17.6
-1.0
15.7B
2.92
-0.1
-2.0
15.19
0.14
07:46
19.9
-1.0
15.78
2.97
-0.5
-1.5
15.20
0.14
07:4;
20.2
-1.0
15.76
2.88
0.7
-1.5
15.IB
0.14
07:4£
19.8
-1.0
15.76
2.88
0.4
-1.4
15.18
0.14
07:49
19.4
-1.0
15.72
2.91
-1.4
-1.4
15.22
0.14
07:50
19.6
-1.0
15.70
2.92
-0.4
-1.4
15.21
0.14
07:51
20.4
-0.9
15.72
2.90
0.2
-1.3
15.14
0.14
07:52
20.3
-0.9
15.67
2.92
-0.1
-1.2
15.16
0.14
07:53
20.1
-0.9
15.69
2.92
-0.0
-1.2
15.14
0.14
07:5*
19.6
-0.9
15.65
2.95
0.4
-1.2
15.11
0.14
07:55
19.B
-1.0
15.62
2.96
0.9
-1.4
14.99
0.14
07:54
19.0
-1.0
15.58
2.99
-0.2
-1.2
15.01
0.14
07:57
19.5
-0.9
15.55
3.01
0.5
-1.2
14.98
0.14
07:58
19.B
-1.0
15.51
3.03
O.B
-1.3
15.04
0.14
07:59
19.9
-0.9
15.49
3.04
-1.0
-1.2
15.00
0.14
08:%
19.8
-0.9
15.49
3.04
0.8
-l.l
15.02
0.14
AVERAGE VALUES FGR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
08:00
19.9
-0.9
15.65
2.95
0.1
-1.3
15.11
0.14
08:01
19,8
-0.9
15,47
3.05
0.8
-1.3
14.99
0.14
08:02
19.8
-0.9
15.48
3.05
0.5
-1.4
14.99
0.14
CB:03
20.2
-1.0
15.45
3.07
-0.4
-1.4
14.95
0.13
E-91
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludoe Incineraor 06-05-1990
CHAN 6
CHAfi 7
CHAN 8 CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 3
CHAN 4
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
TIME
oo«502
ascNOx
Z 02 Z
C02
ddi'HC
DOi CO
Z 02
z cr
08:04
19.9
-0.9
15.45
3.07
-0.4
-1.4
14.98
O.H
08:05
19.8
-0.9
15.42
3.08
-0.7
-1.5
14.88
0.13
08:05
14.0
-0.9
15.45
3.07
-0.5
-1.3
14.93
0.14
08:0?
9-1
8.4
15.44
3.07
-0.2
-1.2
14.87
0.14
08:08
8.5
10.2
15.45
3.06
0.2
-1.2
14.98
0.14
08:09
7.7
10.1
15.44
3.06
-0.3
-1.1
14.95
0.14
08:10
7.8
10.1
15.45
3.06
-0.1
-1.2
14.93
0.14
08:11
7.4
10.2
15.44
3.05
-3.0
-1.1
14.92
0.14
08:12
7.4
10.1
15.45
3.05
-7.7
-1.2
14.82
0.14
08:15
7.2
10.3
15.44
3.04
-7.2
-1.2
14.91
0.14
08:14
7.4
10.6
15.42
3.05
-7.4
-1.2
14.61
0.14
08:15
7.2
11.5
15.32
3.13
-7.5
-1.1
14.66
0.14
AVERA6E VALUES
FDR THE LAST
15 HIKUTES
08:15
12.2
5.7
15.44
3.06
-2.3
-1.3
14.91
0.14
08:16
7.4
13.4
15.14
3.27
-7.3
-t.l
14.35
0.14
08:17
8.1
15.5
14.95
3.42
-7.3
-1.1
14.04
0.14
08:16
9.5
18.2
14.66
3.64
-7.4
-1.1
13.79
0.14
08:19
11.7
20.5
14.44
3.82
-7.4
-1.1
13.42
0.14
08:20
13.4
22.2
14.22
3.98
-7.4
-1.0
13.17
0.14
08:21
15.0
23.3
14.06
4.09
-7.3
-1.0
13.09
0.15
08:22
16.9
24.3
13.94
4.19
-7,5
-1.0
12.84
0.15
08:23
17.7
24.3
13.89
4.23
-7.3
-0.9
12.84
0.15
08:24
IB.4
23.6
14.27
4.05
-7.5
-0.9
13.16
0.15
08:25
19.3
24.7
14.14
4.12
-7.4
-0.9
14.09
0.15
08:26
19.4
24.3
14.29
4.06
-7.5
-0.8
14.05
0.15
08:27
20.1
24.9
13.61
4.58
-7.6
-0.4
12.57
0.15
08:28
23.4
26.5
13.27
4.90
-7.c
-0.7
12.30
0.15
08:29
26.0
27.9
12.97
5.17
-7.6
-0.6
11.85
0.15
08:30
27.9
29.2
12.63
5.44
-7.7
-0.3
11.61
0.15
AVERAGE
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 HlfcUTES
08:30
16.9
22.9
14.03
4.20
-7.4
-0.9
13.15
0.15
08:31
30.4
30.0
12.42
5.64
-7.7
-0.7
11.42
0.15
08:32
32.4
31.5
12.12
5.89
-7.8
-0.5
10.91
0.15
08:33
34.5
34.6
11.34
6.56
-7.8
-0.6
10.21
0,15
08:34
40.0
37.7
10.60
7.18
-6.5
-0.6
9.21
0.15
08:35
46.7
40.8
9.60
8.06
-7.7
-0.6
8.13
0.15
08:36
55.7
41.5
8.62
8.95
-7.fi
-0.6
6.87
0.15
08:37
69.0
44.3
7.5C
9.78
-7.E
-0.7
5.29
0.15
00:38
85.0
46.7
6.42
10.69
-7.8
-0.5
3.80
0.15
08:39
105.9
46.6
5.80
11.00
-4.1
-0.5
2.68
0.15
08:40
125.3
47.0
5.58
11.21
1.0
-0.4
2.45
0.15
08:41
129.4
46.3
5.9C
11.01
0.8
-0.6
2.20
0.15
08:42
125.7
45.2
6.11
10.81
0.4
-0.5
2.17
0.15
08:43
118.8
43.2
7.OS
10.12
0.3
-0.4
3.39
0.15
08:44
104.2
44.6
3.87
8.76
0.1
-0.4
5.48
0.15
08:45
84.9
44.3
9.51
8.22
-0.1
-0.6
6.42
0.15
AVERASt
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
08:45
79.2
41.6
8.5C
8.92
-4.2
-0.6
6.04
0.15
E-92
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineracr 06-05-1990
CHAN 6 CHAN 7 CHAN B CHAN10 CHAN 1 CHAN 2 CHAN 3 CHAS <
BOILER BOILER BOILER BOILER STACK STACK STACK STACK
TIME opiS02 pptNQx I 02 Z CP2 opiTHC coe CO ^ 02 I C32
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 60 fllNUTES OF VALID DATA
08:iS 32.1 17.3 13.40 4.76 -3.4 -1.0 12.30 0.14
08:46
72.5
44.6
9.90
7.95
-0.1
-0.6
6.71
0.15
08:4?
" 66.4
44.2
10.10
7.76
-0.2
-0.6
7.23
0.15
0B:48
63.4
43.2
10.13
7.72
-0.3
-0.4
7.19
0.15
08:49
61.5
44.4
10.28
7.62
-0.3
-0.5
7.28
0.15
08:50
60.5
43.6
10.14
7.74
-0.4
-0.5
7.29
0.15
E-93
-------
0<^L. X X ON SUMMARV
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineracr
REASON: Initial direct cal
DATE : "'06-05-1990 TIME: 08:50 - 09:44
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER-
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER-
BOILER
ppinS02
ppmSQ2
ppmS02
ppmNOx'
ppmNOx
ppmNOx
7. 02
•/. 02
*/. 02
0 . o
218.0
361 .4
o. 0
240.0
475.0
0.00
12. 50
20.60
MONITOR
RESPONSE
2.7
217.8
359. 1
0.1
240 . 7
479.2
0.05
12.50
20.67
10
10
10
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
7. C02
7. C02
7. C02
o. ou
11.01
17.46
0.01
10.99
17.67
STACK
STACK
STACK.
STACK
STACK
STACK
pprnTHC
pprnTHC
pprnTHC
ppm CO
pprr CO
ppm CO
0 .0
181.2
282.0
0.0
457 . 5
1263.0
0 . 7
182 . 6
284.2
0.9
457.0
1289.2
STACK
STACK
STACK
7. C02
7. C02
7. C02
0.00
11.01
17.46
0 .04
i 1 .03
17.63
E-94
-------
Sit? 9
Sludge hcineraor
06-05-1990
CHAM o
CHAM 7
CHAN 3
ChflNlO
CHAh :
CHAN 2
:m 4
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STAC<
STACK
STACK
HEARTH
Tlf^
odiso;
CD«N0X
: 02
I C32
;d"Thc
d:i CD
I C32
I 02
09:51
344.7
226.9
9.70
£.56
6.8
235.5
c .05
— *
7.53
09152
329.0
226.7
10.09
8.15
5 > 2
158.4
6.02
7.72
09:53
2il.e
236.0
10.23
s.oe
5.2
186.4
5.90
7.55
09:54
299.!
232.3
IC.28
6.04
5.2
136.3
5.79
7.99
C9:55
296.4
234.4
10.30
8.04
5.1
196.3
5.82
3.12
09:5 e
292. c
238.5
10.24
S..1
5.1
138.6
5.77
? .51
09:57
296.5
231.6
1C.06
8.23
5.0
197.0
5.B7
16.41
09:58
301.5
240.8
9.99
8.38
5.1
138.2
5.91
15.69
39:59
3C9.5
232.8
9.72
6.52
4.9
174.3
6.00
14.95
10:00
316.8
240.4
9.59
8.70
5.0
169.8
6.15
M.58
AVERAGE VALUES r OR
THE i-ASI
HOUR: 1C MINUTES OF
VA.ij DA'
h
10:00
309.7
234.0
10.03
8.26
5.2
138.2
5.93
11.07
i C: 01
32a.3
239.0
9.55
8.64
4.8
160.3
6.20
14.38
10:02
127.0
232.6
9.57
8.63
4.7
163.1
0.19
14.25
1C:C5
324.7
238.2
9.63
8.65
4.8
163.9
6,15
14.14
10:0*
330.6
229.3
9.41
3.76
4.7
161.6
6.22
14.06
iC ;05
329.1
237.7
9.59
8.67
4.7
169.7
6.18
14.00
10: Co
329.8
234.9
9.54
B.62
4.7
160.0
6.20
13.96
10: C 7
325.4
231.0
9.54
8.71
4.8
170.1
e. 15
13.92
IC:C9
134.5
236.9
9.36
8.78
4.7
167.9
6.20
13,39
1C:C*
340.0
229.9
9.29
8.91
4.6
155.3
6.32
13.37
10:10
33a. 2
237.3
9.51
8.72
4.8
161.3
6.26
13.35
10:11
332.6
230.9
9.48
B.69
4.8
177.3
6.21
13.84
10 -.12
326.7
231.2
9.56
8.72
4.8
191.7
6.20
10.39
10; i 3
326.1
241.3
9.53
8.62
4.8
190.7
6.14
9.28
10:14
324.0
226.4
9.47
8.76
4.9
184.0
6.20
9.30
10:15
332.2
233.2
9.46
8.31
5.1
202.0
6.20
9.14
AVERAGE
VALUES FOR
THE LAST
15 HINJTES
10:15
329.7
234.0
9.50
8.71
4.3
171.3
6.20
12.35
10:1 o
343.1
226.1
9.19
8.92
4.8
186.9
6.32
3.90
10:17
344.3
226.7
9.41
8.88
4.7
189.1
6.28
9.09
10:16
347.3
229.8
9.25
8.B5
5.1
197.5
6.24
10.75
10:19
351.2
219.6
9.12
9.07
5.0
192.0
6.32
12.50
10:20
362.2
233.7
9.35
8.81
5.3
194.5
6.22
16.05
lC:2t
162.7
216.5
£.82
9.2C
4.7
168.0
6.35
20.67
10:22
373.?
220.0
£.94
9.07
4.7
196.3
6.41
8.75
1C:22
382.0
213.6
6.63
9.24
4.9
170.7
6.43
0.10
10:24
392.6
210.9
3.85
9.18
5.1
190.7
6.51
' 5.56
10:25
379.5
218.3
9.87
6.18
5.7
239.2
6.39
10.27
10:26
324.6
206.6
1C.51
7.85
7.8
349.5
5.92
11.20
10:27
303.9
209.8
1C.89
7.44
8.2
375.9
5.65
11.52
10:28
292.3
203.0
1C.73
7.56
8.2
366.0
5.66
11.66
10:29
285.4
201.9
11.03
7.41
8.4
3B0.0
5.59
11.84
10:30
279.7
200.6
10.97
7.26
9.0
400.3
5.46
11.81
AVERASE
VALUES FOR
THE LAST
13 KINUTES
10:30
341.7
215. B
9.70
6.46
6.1
253.0
6.12
10.71
10:31
278.5
197.5
10.98
7.46
8.7
403.1
5.55
11.89
10:32
278.8
199.9
11.06
7.27
9.3
416.1
5.45
11.74
E-95
-------
Site ?
SeMaqe Sludge Incineraor
06-05-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 4
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
HEARTH
TIME
P3»SD2
OPehQx
X 02
X C02
DOtTHC
dps CO
I CQ2
Z 02
10:33
276.0
[95.5
10.79
7.53
9.1
402.6
5.56
11.74
¦C:34
277.2
195.3
10.98
7.42
9.0
413.9
5.52
11.65
10:35
279.8
196.7
10.67
7.57
9.5
405.9
5.55
11.41
iC:3c
282.0
194.7
10.70
7.65
9.5
406.2
5.52
11.25
10:37
-'2B5.5
196.4
10.46
7.75
9.5
405.4
5.65
10.84
10:38
291.8
1B3.6
10.26
7.96
10.5
408.4
5.85
10.44
1C:3*
291.9
193.1
10.41
7.85
10.2
424.9
5.74
10.30
10:40
293.2
193.0
10.26
7.96
10.1
398.0
5.31
10.14
10:41
294.5
193.4
10.30
7.99
9.8
401.8
5.83
9.94
10:42
2B2.5
197.9
11.39
6.98
10.4
419.6
5.66
10.64
10:43
242.4
191.5
11.50
7.09
9.6
442.0
5.23
11.75
10:44
263.7
196.1
10.42
7.79
9.4
412.2
5.60
10.34
10:45
256.9
199.B
11.58
6.93
9.4
403.0
5.59
10.89
AVERAGE
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
10:45
278.3
195.0
10.78
7.55
9.6
410.9
5.61
11.00
10:4c
234.9
194.7
11.62
6.93
9,6
442.5
5.21
11.48
10:47
246.0
196.4
10.42
7.87
9.5
397.7
5.49
10.50
10:48
268.1
186.3
10.80
7.61
9.5
375.8
5.87
10.14
10:4?
269.8
192.0
10.26
7.98
iO.O
424.0
5.5B
10.18
10:50
276.9
188.1
10.14
0.13
9.3
373.1
5.91
9.30
10:51
234.5
193.1
10.05
8.14
9.5
398.3
5.90
B.96
10:52
291.8
192.3
9.7E
0.41
9.6
376.8
6.02
8.64
10:53
302.4
185.8
9.57
8.53
9.1
371.7
6.13
8.50
10:54
313.6
188.8
9.37
8.68
9.5
372.0
6.17
7.93
10:55
315.7
185.8
9.40
8.69
9.3
363.5
6.27
7.78
10:5c
321.2
189.9
9.12
8.B6
9.5
377.6
6.30
7.62
10:57
329.8
186.4
0.96
8.99
9.4
341.9
6.42
7.51
10:58
336.0
18B.3
9.08
8.91
9.4
363.4
6.42
7.71
10:59
336.2
192.1
0.99
0.96
9.8
359.1
6.44
7.91
11:00
335.3
187.8
9.15
8.86
9.2
349.8
6.37
8.25
AVERAGE
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
11:00
297.5
189.8
9.78
0.37
9.5
379.1
6.03
8.83
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 60 HINUTES OF VALID OATA
11:00
311.8
208.7
9.94
8.27
7.5
303.6
5.99
10.65
11:01
329.8
194.3
9.26
8.76
9.5
357.0
6.32
8.23
11:02
323.6
193.9
9.34
8.67
9.1
320.7
6.31
8.32
11:03
304.3
197.9
9.86
B.23
9.1
351.4
6.14
8.80
11:04
285.7
199.0
10.00
8.07
9.5
340.7
5;91
9.14
11:05
276.1
193.4
9.99
8.16
9.2
361.0
5.94
9.21
11:06
277,9
200.9
9.99
0.11
9.7
360.3
5.80
8.93
11:07
278.1
192.8
9.75
B. 34
9.5
349.8
6.00
8.83
11:08
266.5
195.9
9.7!
B. 37
9.2
360.1
6.04
8.53
11:09
294,1
195.9
9.54
B. 46
8.9
334.0
6.OB
8.15
11:10
296.6
192.4
9.53
B.51
9.4
352.4
6.13
8.02
11:11
306.6
197.7
9.23
8.72
9.5
339.6
6.18
7.64
11:12
329.9
138.7
8.84
9.08
B.9
329.2
6.41
7.29
11:13
340.9
198.4
9.04
0.89
9.3
341.5
6.48
7.40
11:14
328.9
202.8
9.26
8.70
B.9
320.2
6.33
7.73
11:15
312.7
209.7
9.55
8.49
8.0
301.1
6.22
8.42
E-96
-------
Site ?
Sexage Sludoe Incineraor
06-05-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAM 4
CHAN 3
BCILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
HEARTH
TIME
do»B02
dciNOx
I 02
I C02
dd«THC
DOB CO
: CO 2
I 02
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
11:15
304.8
196.9
9.52
8.50
9.2
342.4
6.16
8.31
ll:io
. 301.5
212.2
9.74
e.27
8.0
305.8
6.08
8.69
11:17 "
292.5
203.0
9.73
8.33
7.9
305.4
6.OB
0.95
11: IS
293.9
211.1
9.82
6.27
8.1
312.6
6.03
9.OS
11:19
290.4
206.1
9.71
8.34
8.1
318.4
6.07
9.27
11:20
286.3
207.0
9.93
8.18
8.4
338.4
5.98
9.36
11:2!
287. B
207.0
9,81
8.20
8.4
330.6
5.98
9.27
11:22
2S8.6
202.9
9.71
6.34
8.1
331.6
6.04
9.36
11:23
2?5.7
207.B
9.68
8.33
7.7
327.3
6.02
9.15
11:2*
300.1
201.2
9.49
8.54
8.1
310.3
6.13
9.17
11:25
304.3
209.4
9.58
6.45
7.B
326.7
6.11
9.02
11:26
304.4
204.6
9,51
8.47
7.9
' 308.6
6.10
0.92
11:27
304.0
202.5
9.66
8.39
7.9
315.7
6.15
8.95
11:25
299.7
207.9
9.75
8.24
8.3
332.3
5.99
9.08
11:29
298.0
198.8
9.68
8.39
8.5
328.6
6.09
9.06
11:30
296.0
205.6
9.92
8.16
8.3
339.3
6.00
9.18
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
11:30
296.2
205.9
9.72
8.33
8.1
322.1
6.06
9.10
11:31
290.6
202.6
9.74
8.28
8.B
332.4
5.96
9.09
11:3?
287.4
202.3
9.85
8.24
8.3
338.6
5.96
9.30
11:33
290.7
202.4
9.70
8.20
8.7
325.3
5.96
9.09
11:34
291.6
197.4
9.79
8.27
B.4
335.5
6.03
9.27
11:35
289.0
204.2
9.97
8.12
B.4
335.5
5.90
9.34
11:3c
287.6
197.2
9.74
8.30
8.3
327.3
5.99
9.29
11:37
292.3
201.3
9.SO
8.28
3.3
342.0
5.94
9.30
11:38
293.5
201.0
9.64
8.36
B.4
328.0
6.00
9.04
11:39
303.4
194.0
9.43
8.56
B.3
321.6
'6.07
0.09
11:40
305.3
200.9
9.58
8.41
8.5
328.0
6.00
6.85
11:41
309.1
192.5
9.46
8.55
8.3
320.2
6.09
E.74
11:42
313.6
200.3
9.53
8.46
B.2
337.5
6.05
8.36
11:43
306.6
197.7
9.53
8.46
B.6
304.5
6.03
0.96
11:44
310.3
194.1
9.52
8.49
7.8
308.9
6.04
8.93
11:45
310.2
214.0
10.03
8.10
8.4
337.1
5.92
9.25
AVERASE
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 KINUTES
11:45
298.9
200.2
9.69
8.34
8.4
328.2
6.00
9.08
11:46
297.2
213.3
10.25
8.02
7.1
292.8
5.03
9.89
11:47
291.7
215.0
10.33
8.01
7.2
313.9
5.73
9.90
11:46
291.8
209.7
10.23
7.99
a.o
313.3
5.79
9.88
11:49
237.7
209.3
10.34
7.96
8.1
349.7
5.77
10.05
11:50
236.7
209.7
10.34
7.87
8.2
345.0
5.76
10.05
11:51
284.5
205.5
10.31
7.96
7.9
341.0
5.80
9.96
11:52
286.3
211.0
10.35
7,90
8.2
349.0
5.73
9.93
11:53
285.1
207.6
10.21
8.06
8.4
330.9
5.80
9.91
11:54
291.7
218.0
10.25
7.99
7.5
332.4
5.35
9.B6
11:55
280.5
21B.9
10.66
7.64
7.7
320.3
5.74
10.20
11:56
267.1
217.5
10.77
7.58
7.5
330.0
5.62
10.50
11:57
263.6
217.9
10.83
7.49
8.0
344.B
5.56
10,50
11:53
261.4
213.3
10.79
7.55
8.2
341.1
5.60
10.39
E-97
-------
Site 9 Sewage Siidce Incireraor 06-05-1990
CHAN 6
CHAM 7
CHAN £
CHAN10
:han i
CHAN 2
CHAN 4
CnAN 3
BOILER
EQILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
HEARTH
TIKE ODiS02
do>NOx
I 02
I CD2
dciTHC
DDI CC
I C02
X 02
11:39 258.3
213.1
10.92
7.41
8.3
361.9
5.58
10.55
12:00 254.6
210.3
10.86
7.43
8.5
358.5
5.52
10.47
AVERAGE VALUES FCR THE LAST
15 1INUTES
12:0C 279.2
212.7
10.50
7.79
7.9
335. C
5.71
10.14
AVERASE VALUES FOR THE LAST HQU9: 60 HIKUTES OF /ALIO DATA
12:00 29*.8 203.9 9.B6 8.24 8.4 331.9 5.98 9.14
12:01
255.5
209.1
10.B7
7.45
8.3
365.1
5.56
10.41
12:02
254.9
219.2
10.82
7.46
8.6
359.7
5.56
10.36
12:03
253.5
221.0
10.75
7.57
7.6
331.2
5.59
10.27
12:04
258.7
225.6
10.62
7.65
7.5
337.6
5.66
9.80
12:05
258.5
224.6
10.63
7.67
7.8
' 326.8
5.67
9.63
12:06
25B.5
227.4
10.60
7,68
7.8
347.5
5.68
9.57
12:07
262.0
228.7
10.13
8.09
7.1
319.C
5.77
9.14
12:08
273.1
224 .6
9.B4
8.28
7.0
314.C
5.98
B.74
12:09
286.5
225.7
9.55
8.56
7.0
316.8
6.16
8.26
12:10
304.7
222.0
9.21
8.85
6.6
2B2.5
6.28
7.BO
12:11
322.3
222.5
8.96
9.03
6.5
289.7
6.40
7.46
12:12
324.1
228.5
9.41
8.65
6.8
273.8
6.42
7.48
12:13
314.2
230.6
9.*7
8.62
6.9
284.1
6.36
7.88
12:14
308.2
237.4
9.78
8.38
6.8
280.3
6.36
8.37
12:15
296.7
232.5
9.B8
8.26
6.8
282.6
6.22
8.48
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
12:15 282.1 225.3 10.03 8.15
7.3
314.0
5.98
1.91
12:16
291.6
236.1
9.90
8.29
6.8
284.8
6.18
8.68
12:17
236.5
234.0
10.01
8.15
6.6
265.9
6.12
8.79
12:16
278.6
233.7
10.13
6.06
6.7
232.7
6.12
9.15
12:19
270.1
233.3
10. *7
7.74
7.0
290.1
5.94
9.58
12:20
261.5
227.8
10.49
7.72
7.4
305.6
5.81
10.03
12:21
252.1
230.6
10.77
7.51
7.3
312.9
5.78
10.13
12:22
243.8
228,3
10.86
7.38
7.4
310.5
5.64
10.06
12:23
240.4
228.4
10.80
7.45
B.O
332.6
5.67
10.27
12:24
236.4
228.9
10.99
7.26
B.O
325.7
5.53
10.32
12:25
236.9
226.3
10.83
7.38
7.9
333.4
5.60
10.43
12:26
234.6
227.6
11.05
7.24
B.l
342.9
5.57
10.46
12:27
229.7
223.5
11.22
7.03
8.5
355.2
5.47
10.63
12:28
221.1
222.2
11.34
6.98
9.2
385.1
5.39
10.90
12:29
220.0
221.2
11.37
6.90
9.1
372.1
5.30
10.96
12:30
219.3
223. B
11.18
7.10
9.2
386.4
5.41
10.78
AVERAGE
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
12:30
24B.2
228.4
10.76
7.48
7.8
325.7
5.70
10.08
12:31
222.5
223.6
11.30
6.99
B.9
376.0
5.41
10.73
12:32
222.0
220.9
11.15
7.10
9.1
374.C
5.43
10.82
12:33
224.1
223.2
11.20
7.11
9.3
385. t
5.48
10.71
12:34
223.2
220.9
11.22
7.03
9.4
378.5
5.41
10.65
12:3:
219.3
216.4
11.36
6.93
9.5
393.3
5 = 40
o
CO
o--
12:36
211.5
208.1
12.04
6.45
10.2
440.2
5.11
11.86
12:37
206.1
213.7
11.60
6.73
9.9
416.3
5.13
11.53
E-98
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludoe Incineraor
06-05-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CKAk 8
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 4
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
HEARTH
TIME
ooiS02
ooiNOx
I 02
I C02
dd«THC
DDI CO
I CC2
I 02
12:38
204.2
211.6
11.69
6.68
10.3
430.1
5.15
11.23
12:3?
205.5
206.1
11.50
6.30
10.1
403.1
5.21
10.30
12:40
210.3
209.7
11.36
6.96
9.?
411.7
5.32
10.49
12:41
215.0
203.1
11.39
6.87
10.2
395.5
5.34
10.42
12:42
U12.9
205.4
11.37
6.88
9.8
39C.0
5.35
10.27
12:43
"214.4
207.0
a.36
6.91
10.0
397.7
5.36
10.22
12:44
219.4
206.1
11.25
7.00
9.5
378.1
5.38
10.03
12:40
219.8
212.1
11.08
7.20
9.4
337.8
5.42
9.90
AVERAGE VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 HINUTES
12:45
215.3
213.1
11.39
6.91
9.7
397.2
5.33
10.70
12:46
228.2
215.8
10.78
7.46
9.4
348.3
5.58
9.39
12:47
235.6
218.2
10.43
7.73
9.1
350.3
5.75
9.06
12:46
243.5
217.8
10.25
7.95
9.3
' 341.0
5.87
B.65
12:4?
246.4
213.2
10.15
7.85
9.4
337.6
5.36
8.66
12:50
248.6
215.0
10.21
7.90
9.3
342.0
5.98
8,59
12:51
242.2
208.2
.10.83
7.42
9.6
360.3
5.67
9.72
12:52
238.7
215.2
10.27
7.84
9.4
358.5
5.32
8.78
12:53
246.7
218.4
10.12
7.97
9.4
338.1
5.91
8.52
12:54
253.9
214.4
9.99
8.06
8.8
320.6
6.03
8.58
12:55
253.8
217.1
10.14
7.98
9.2
335.0
6.00
8.82
12:56
255.7
210.6
10.06
8.02
8.7
321.0
6.00
9.07
12:57
257.4
209.2
10.19
7.93
8.7
340.7
5.98
9.36
12:58
256.4
205.9
10.05
8.00
8.9
344.3
5.90
9.51
12:59
264.3
199.3
10.56
7.73
B.5
357.0
5.94
10.90
13:00
272.9
201.9
9.84
8.19
8.2
348.8
5.9B
10.14
AVERAGE VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 niN'JTES
13:00
249.6
212.0
10.26
7.86
9.1
342.9
5.38
9.19
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST
HOUR: 60 HINUTES OF
VALIO DATA
13:00
248.0
219.7
10.61
7.60
8.5
345.0
5.72
9.72
13:01
266.4
200.2
10.59
7.53
9.1
348.4
5.94
10.63
13:02
252.3
189.5
10.02
7.31
9.2
385.6
5.65
10. B8
13:03
236.9
196.6
10.91
7.27
10.6
407.7
5.35
10.93
13:04
248.9
203.3
10.02
8.07
3.2
350.8
5.69
10.34
13:05
259.5
198.9
10.10
7.86
8.4
345.0
5.B5
10.14
13:06
260.2
197.8
9.81
0.23
8.4
351.0
5.86
10.06
13:07
275.7
204.6
9.73
8.16
B.O
337.6
5.99
9.43
13:08
252.9
201.8
10.21
7.84
0.B
352.0
5.71
9.95
13:0?
272.9
199.0
9.06
8.88
7.8
337.1
6.01
£.75
13:10
310.6
206.0
8.92
8.81
7.8
299.8
6.46
8.14
13:11
305.3
200.6
9.27
8.62
B.2
319.7
6.28
8.41
13:12
301.6
207.1
9.45
8.50
8.0
319.0
6.13
£.49
13:13
305.8
204.0
9.18
8.71
0.0
305.4
6.25
8.66
13:14
2B9.5
213.3
9.73
8.26
7.4
303.1
6.11
9.22
13:15
273.7
213.8
10.04
7.93
7.7
306.3
5.93
9.49
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
13:15
274.1
202.4
9.8c
8.13
3.4
337.9
5.95
9.56
13:16
262.6
212.3
9.93
8.10
7.8
324.0
5.79
9.60
E-99
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor 06-05-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CHAN10
zm i
CHAN 2
CHAN 4
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
HEARTH
TIME
00iSG2
dcsHOj
I 02
2 C02
ddiTHC
OP* CO
: cc2
: 02
13:17
250.8
20B.9
10.8:
7.IB
8.4
332.9
5.75
9.96
13:16
214.2
199.6
11.23
6.90
9.8
399.9
5.11
11.03
13:19
222.9
205.5
10.44
7.66
8.6
390.0
5.27
10.71
13:20
255.2
206.2
9.67
8.28
7.9
322.1
5.80
9.83
13:21 :
, 279.1
204.1
9.48
0.47
7.2
319.2
6.07
9.60
13:22
" 283.5
208.5
9.47
8.39
7.2
306.0
6.09
9.34
13:23
287.8
202. B
9.53
8.38
7.1
298.4
6.OB
9.35
13:24
291.4
204.4
9.63
8.31
7.5
318.3
5.9B
9.46
13:25
293.4
198.7
9.51
8.39
7.5
307.7
6.05
9.55
13:26
293.3
198.3
9.60
6.33
7.4
330.7
6.01
9.58
13:27
294.6
197.3
9.46
B.41
7.7
317.B
6.06
9.55
13:28
297.4
194.3
9.55
8.39
7.3
319.3
6.08
9.56
13:29
296.3
199.4
9.5C
B.40
7.6
324.0
6.01
9.47
13:30
298.9
193,5
9.31
8.63
7.3
312.0
6.13
9.47
AVERAGE
VALUES
rGR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
13:30
275.1
202.2
9.81
8.15
7.8
328.2
5.39
9.74
13:31
305.7
199.5
9.45
8.48
7.6
322.7
6.13
9.60
13:32
300.1
201.5
9.33
8.56
7.3
305.2
6.14
9.42
13:33
301.9
200.5
9.33
8.63
7.4
306.9
6.15
9.51
13:34
298.1
206.8
9.43
8.43
7.5
305.6
6.10
9.43
13:35
292.4
200.4
9.32
8.61
7.2
300.0
6.14
9.43
13:36
299.4
205.6
9.27
B.65
7.0
299.4
6.19
9.32
13:37
299.2
203.B
9.IB
8.69
6.9
276.0
6.23
9.19
13:38
301.5
206.5
9.21
8.71
6.6
2B0.B
6.24
9.21
13:39
301.1
209.8
9.18
6.67
6.2
260.4
6.20
9.03
13:40
302.7
206.1
9.17
8.73
6.4
265.2
6.27
9.16
13:41
301.7
214.2
9.35
8.57
6.2
255.5
6.20
9.22
13:42
298.4
211.3
9.26
3.63
6.1
248.2
6.23
9.40
13:43
295.4
211.8
9.38
B.56
6.2
262.1
6.17
9.72
13:44
295.2
211.6
9.38
3.49
6.2
252.1
6.09
9.60
13:45
293.8
208.3
9.40
8.53
6.2
257.1
6.15
9.59
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 PtlhUTES
13:45 299.1 206.5 9.31
13:46 292.0 215.5 9.50
13:47 290.0 20B.6 9.40
13:48 291.5 213.6 9.42
13:49 2SB.6 212.7 9.46
13:50 283.1 213.0 9.54
13:51 278.4 215.6 9.79
13:52 270.5 215.6 9.99
13:53 271.9 219.7 9.95
13:54 277.3 221.9 9.73
13:55 278.9 223.1 9.84
13:56 279.1 226.0 9,87
13:57 276.5 223.5 9.76
13:58 277.1 226.0 9.95
13:59 272.9 221.3 9.91
14:00 270.2 227.1 9,96
1.59
6.7
279.
6.IB
9.39
3.43
5.9
254.4
6.07
9.62
8.52
5.7
23B.2
6.14
9.52
8.51
6.0
255.6
6.11
9.48
B.42
5.7
247.2
6.11
9.49
B.3B
6.1
252.2
6.08
9.66
3.14
6.5
259.4
5.98
9.63
8.10
6.2
267.6
5.91
9.83
8.17
6.3
270.1
5.33
9.78
8.30
5.8
239.7
5.95
9.53
8.25
5.3
226.4
6.01
9.85
8.13
5.5
232.3
5.97
9.8?
8.29
5.6
235.5
5.99
9.77
8.13
5.4
233.6
5.96
9.66
8.15
5.7
240.7
5.96
9.65
8.15
5.7
257.4
5.91
9.71
E-100
-------
Site 9 Se*age Sludce ln::neraor 06-05-1990
CHAN o CHAN 7 CHfN 8 CHANIO CHAN 1 ChfiN 2 CHAN 4 CHAN 3
53ILER BOILER BOILER BOILER STACK STAC< STACK HEARTh
TIHE pp«S02 odcNDx Z G2 I C02 ppaTHC ppa CO Z CC2 X 02
AVERAEE VALUES FOR ThE .AST 15 MINUTES
14:00 279.9 213.9 9.74 3.27 5.3 247.7 6.00 9.67
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST HGl-R: 60 H1NJTES Of VALID DATA
14:00 262.1 207.5 9.63 8.29 7.2 298.4 6.00 9.59
14:01
276,3
225.6
5.78
8.23
5.8
247.5
5.B9
9.73
14:02
279.9
221.7
5.66
8.40
5.4
241.5
6.06
9.79
14:03
284.9
226.1
5.97
8.05
5.5
234.4
6.02
9.74
14:04
267.4
220.0
10.36
7.78
6.3
2B3.9
5.34
10.19
14:05
256.1
224.1
10.4?
7.63
6.9
293.0
5.71
10.44
14:06
252.5
220.7
10.52
7.61
7.0
286.9
5.64
10.42
14:07
247.1
220.3
10.55
7.63
7.1
301.1
5.65
10.55
14:06
242.6
221.6
10.72
7.38
7.0
292.4
5.56
10.65
14:05
239.9
217.7
10.72
7.42
7.3
304.6
5.53
10.74
14;10
236.6
220.3
10. B9
7.30
7.3
316.1
5.50
10.78
14:11
231.6
215.9
1C.94
7.17
7.4
316.6
5.45
10.89
14:12
215.0
208.3
11.90
6.54
8.4
385.9
5.20
11.64
14:13
209.1
212.8
11.10
7.08
8.5
379.0
5.08
11.26
14:14
210.8
213.1
10.66
7.53
8.0
354.0
5.40
10.63
14:15
239. B
218.6
10.10
7.96
6.8
305.8
5.68
9.91
AVERAGE
VALUES FOR
THE LAST
15 OUTES
14:15
246.5
219.1
10.56
7.58
7.0
302.9
5.61
10.49
14:16
255.6
207.0
9.76
B. 16
7.1
301.1
5.93
9.32
14:17
260.0
209.4
9.84
8.15
7.0
303.2
5.96
9.2?
14:18
262.6
205.6
9.75
8.17
7.0
288.4
5.92
9.46
14:19
265.5
193.8
9.87
8.13
6.8
308.4
5.95
9.76
14:20
269.6
195.6
9.73
8.10
7.0
313.5
5.B3
10.13
14:21
280.8
184.3
9.56
8.41
7.0
304.1
5.97
10.28
14:22
293.4
184.8
9.67
8.24
6.9
328.4
5.87
10.50
14:23
300.3
179.6
9.37
8.49
7.1
324.5
6.05
10.72
14:24
303.9
173.3
9.64
8.16
7.3
359.8
6.00
11.08
14:25
299.2
177.4
9.66
8.18
8.2
373.1
5.89
11.15
COMENIS: DATA FOR RUNS 7B 4-6
E-101
-------
G^L_ I E«R:*Vr X UN SUMMARY
SOURCE: Sits 9 Sewage Sludge Incmeraor
REASON: Direct cal check after Run 8
DATE •' 06-05-1990 TIME: 14:25 - 14:54
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
MONITOR
RESPONSE
8
3
10
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ppmS02
ppmS02
ppmNO:-;
ppmNQx
*/. 02
'/. 02
7. C02
"/. C02
O . U
36 t . 4
0. O
240. O
0.00
12.50
0.00
11.01
531
1
0.06
1 ^ T*
10 . 95:
STACK
STACK
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
0.0
131.2
1.6
179.1
STACK
STACK
ppm CO
ppm CO
0.0
457. 5
7.3
461 . 5
STACK
STACK
*/. C02
7. C02
O . 00
11.01
O . 0 o
10 . G?
HEARTH
HEARTH
7. 02
7. 02
0. GO
12. 50
0. 08
12.72
E-102
-------
O AL_ X BRAT I ON SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sowage Sludge Incineraar
REASON: Repeat of direct cal after analyzer adjustments
DATE
06-05-1990
TIME
14:54 - 16
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
OAS
VALUE
MONITOR
RESPONSE
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ppm502
ppmS02
ppmS02
0.0
218.0
361 .4
. /
219.4
365.4
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ppmNO;-:
ppmNOjc
ppmNOx
0.0
240.0
475.0
1. 4
240.9
477.1
BOILER
BOILER
*/. 02
*/. 02
0.00
12. 50
U . uo
12.50
HEARTH
HEARTH
*/. 02
'/. 02
0.00
12, 50
(J . "Je
12. 50
E-103
-------
Site 9 Sewaoe Sludge Incineraor 06-05-1990
CHAN 6
CHAM 7
CHAN 8
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 4
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
(•EARTH.
TIME
coiSO?
DOfihOx
X 02
X C02
dciTHC
coi CC
I C32
1 02
17:37
283.1
207.6
9.70
6.46
6.8
267.3
6.12
B.08
17:36
273.0
214.4
9.91
8.22
6.9
287.9
5.98
8.47
17:3S
273.1
210.1
9.04
8.27
6.9
277.4
5.94
B.50
17:40 .
269.6
219.0
10.07
8.C8
6.4
277.4
5.97
9.02
17:41 :
263.9
219.8
10.08
8.01
6.5
284.6
5.79
9.38
17:A2
259.5
212.8
10.06
8.16
6.5
268.5
5.89
9.57
17:43
261.3
220.B
10.18
7.99
6,3
292.4
5.76
9.58
17:44
259.2
213.3
9.96
8.19
6.5
280.9
5.83
9.63
17:45
265.0
217.0
10.05
8.12
6.2
284.0
5.90
9.67
AVERAGE VALUES FCR THE LAST HOUR:
9 MINUTES OF VALID DATA
17:45
260.1
215.0
9.98
8.16
6.6
280.0
5.91
9.10
17:46
266.5
214.9
9.85
8.21
6.4
286.6
5.86
9.65
17:47
268.1
215.3
10.03
8.15
6.1
273.2
5.91
9.64
17:46
268.2
220.2
10.09
8.03
6.2
301.3
5.B3
9.72
17:49
264.2
213.3
10.12
8.07
6.2
2B9.5
5.85
9.BO
17:50
258.8
217.6
10.23
7.96
6.5
315.3
5.77
9.31
17:51
260.0
217.6
9.91
8.21
6.4
305.8
5.86
9.54
17:5;
261.4
218.8
10.02
8.15
6.2
297.7
5.90
9.46
17:53
266.2
221.6
9.82
B.25
6.2
312.1
5.93
9.21
17:54
266.3
218.6
9.64
8.32
6.1
293.7
5.99
9.11
17:55
272.5
222.4
9.71
8.40
6.1
303.0
6.01
B.91
17:56
279.7
217.2
9,48
8.62
6.1
2B2.6
6.16
8.62
17:57
285.2
220.0
9.71
8.38
5.9
275.2
6.20
8.68
17:58
277.2
223.0
9.94
8.IB
6.2
303.2
6.03
9.06
17:59
265.8
222.0
10.21
8.00
6.4
292.1
5.9B
9.48
18:00
263.3
226.3
10.31
7.88
6.2
319.fi
5.34
9.72
AVERAGE
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
18:00
268.2
219.3
9.95
8.19
6.2
296.7
5.94
9.36
18:01
25B.1
220.6
10.15
8.07
fa.4
301.4
5.88
9.66
18:02
25B.1
222.6
10.33
7.88
6.3
301.4
5.90
9.70
18:03
254.7
223.0
10.30
7.90
6.4
323.3
5.82
9.57
18:04
253.7
222.3
10,37
7.86
6.3
305.6
5.88
9.71
18:05
251.2
225.2
10.29
7.86
6.6
331.0
5.78
9.65
18:06
253-1
221.2
10.24
7.99
6.6
313.3
5.37
9.64
18:07
254.4
227.2
10.28
7.90
6.3
318.3
5.88
9.69
18:06
250.0
224.7
10.26
7.97
6.5
322.8
5.96
9.56
1B:09
251.5
225.7
10.12
8.05
6.4
304.3
5.93
9.61
IB: 10
254.9
225.5
10.09
B.04
6.3
317.2
5.BB
9.59
18:11
247.9
222-3
10.32
7.89
6.3
295.5
5.94
9.74
18:12
237.9
216.0
10.44
7.75
6.5
318.9
5.79
9.33
18:13
236.0
219.7
10.31
7.96
6.7
309.2
5.B3
9.9C
18:14
252.2
217.7
10.51
7.82
6.4
303.5
5.81
io.oe
18:15
249.7
16C.7
12.69
5.71
6.7
326.3
5.73
10.02
AVERAGE
VALUES
FCR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
18:15
250.9
218.4
10.45
7.78
6.4
312.8
5.83
9.73
18:16
111.9
4.9
20.66
0.11
6.9
307.8
5.80
10.01
18:17
40,3
119.7
15.41
4.49
6.8
338.5
5.73
9.97
13:18
142.3
204.6
10.51
7.82
7.1
327.1
5.78
9.94
E-104
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Ir.cineraor 06-05-1990
CHAN & CHAN 7 CHAN 6 CHAN10 CHAN 1 CHAN 2 MAN 4 CHAN 3
BOILER BOILER BOILER BOILER STACK STACK STACK HEARTH
T!h£ pptSC2 ddiNOx 1 D2 I CQ2 pc«TKC cc» CO X C02 I 02
18:19
194.8
207.2
10.63
7.70
6.7
335.8
5.77
9.32
1S: 20
204.4
212.4
10.37
7.88
6.9
338.4
5.71
9.69
18:21
214.B
212.8
10.44
7.90
6.7
317.2
5.33
9.63
18:22
223.4
216.3
10.36
7.93
7.0
334.0
5.83
9.45
18:22
*30. B
213.5
10.24
8.07
6.8
316.2
5.90
9.28
18:24
235.9
218.4
10.41
7.89
6.7
334.5
5.87
9.11
18:25
232.2
219.7
10.33
7.98
6.9
330.1
5.35
9.14
18:26
233.3
218.2
10.36
7.94
6.7
318.A
5.38
9.16
18:27
233.6
223. B
10.30
7.96
6.8
340.3
5.88
9.10
18:28
231.0
221.4
10.33
7.94
6.9
318.7
5.91
9.27
18:29
234 .1
222.7
10.27
7.98
6.6
329.6
5.89
9.14
18:30
235.4
220.4"
10.33
7.94
6.7
319.5
5.94
9.13
AVERAGE
VALUES
FOR
THE LAST
15 MINUTES
18:30
199.9
195.7
11.40
7.17
6.8
327.1
5.84
9.46
18:31
230.5
222.3
10.44
7.86
6.6
316,9
5.88
9.40
18:32
228.7
222.4
10.35
7.B7
6.7
331.3
5.95
9.31
18:33
231.7
219.6
10.31
7.94
6.6
296.4
5.92
9.30
18:34
233.8
225.7
10.33
7.91
6.7
319.6
5.38
9.20
18:35
237.1
224.0
10.33
7.92
6.6
297.2
5.90
9.29
18:36
237.5
228.8
10.31
7.94
6.3
295.4
5.91
9.37
18:37
244.1
226.4
10.20
B.02
6.3
299.2
5.92
9.17
18:36
244.7
224.3
10.37
7.91
6.1
278.1
5.96
9.22
18:39
245.4
226.7
10.34
7.87
6.1
302.6
5.87
9.25
18:40
247.1
218.6
10.34
7.94
6.5
291.9
5.88
9.39
18:41
245.4
223.7
10.52
7.74
6.5
311.1
5.82
9.59
18:42
245.7
222.1
10.43
7.04
6.8
317.3
5.77
9.87
18:43
244.9
220.8
10.62
7.67
6.6
305.8
5.79
9.97
18:44
244.4
221.1
10.55
7.64
6.7
329.6
5.65
9.99
18:45
244.1
21B.6
10.57
7.73
7.1
320.3
5.79
10.15
AVERAGE
VALUES
FOR
THE LAST
15 MINUTES
18:45
240.3
223.0
10.40
7.05
6.6
307.5
5.85
9.50
AVERA6E VALUES FOR THE LAST
HOUR: 60 MINUTES OF VALID DATA
18:45
239.8
214.1
10.55
7.75
6.5
311.0
5.87
9.51
18:46
244.7
220.0
10.71
7.54
6.9
346.7
5.69
10.11
18:47
242.2
217.1
10.57
7.73
7.2
340.4
5.73
10.18
18:48
242.7
219.3
10.71
7.58
7.1
335.4
5.72
10.26
18:49
241.B
217.0
10.60
7.64
7.6
374.9
5.63
10.35
18:50
239.5
217.3
10.63
7.67
7.0
338.1
5.74
10.25
18:51
242.B
218.0
10.51
7.67
6.9
350.8
5.70
10.08
18:52
244.4
214.6
10.53
7,75
7.0
333.7
5.77
10.06
18:53
246.0
217.2
10.57
7.66
6.7
338.3
5.75
9.99
18:54
245.5
214.E
10.56
7.71
6.9
350.2
5.69
10.03
18:55
249.4
213.3
10.66
7.66
6.6
334.6
5.78
10.13
18:56
246.1
214.7
10.63
7.61
7.0
371.3
5.66
10.07
18:57
249.7
212.3
10.57
7.74
6.7
338.8
5.78
10.07
16:59
251.7
215.1
10.61
7.66
6.9
359.3
5.76
9.83
16:59
252.fi
210.5
10.47
7.80
7.4
349.4
5.76
9.81
19:00
249.0
206.6
10.61
7.69
7,2
342.9
5.79
9.67
E-105
-------
Site 9 Staage Sludge !nc:neraor 06-05-l^SO
CHA« 6 CHAN ? CHAN 8 CHAM1C CHAN 1 CKftM 2 CHAN 4 CHAN J
BOILER 50ILER BOILER BOILER STACK STACK STACK HEARTH
TIHE opiS02 oaiNIh I J? I C32 dpiTHC oc« C3 I "02 I 02
AVERAGE VALUES FCR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
19:00
246.0
215.3
10.60
7.67
7.0
347.0
5.73
10.06
19:01 -
249.3
209.3
10.44
7.77
7.4
364,5
5.73
S.37
19:02
253.1
207.9
10.54
7.75
7.7
34:.4
5.34
9.45
19: C 3
253.7
•>11 ~
10.40
7.83
7.1
353.2
5.32
9.24
:9:C4
254.9
211.0
10.31
7.96
7.0
331.9
5.39
9.OS
19:0?
265.4
2CS.5
13.41
7.37
7.1
339.6
5.91
9.25
19:0c
266.6
209.7
10.30
7.93
7.3
333.7
5.9)
9.26
19:07
263.4
209.4
10.37
7.91
6.8
313.9
5.98
9.26
19:08
264.C
212.5
10.53
7.75
6.9
334.3
5.57
9.34
19:0*
Zcl.c
209.?
10.45
7.86
6.8
313.1
5.39
9.38
19:10
261.8
211.6
1C.43
7.82
6.5 ,
320.4
5.89
9.38
19:11
261.1
211.4
10.30
7.93
6.7
313.1
5.90
'.JO
19:12
267.7
2C9.7
10.44
7.84
t.6
294.?
5.91
9.46
19:13
265.0
221.3
10.63
7.66
6.1
308.5
5.82
9.53
19:1*
260.4
220.9
10.62
7.69
6.0
235.4
5.36
9.34
11:15
253.9
222.9
10.73
7.56
5.8
299.9
5.79
9.86
AVERAGE
values ?or
:he -AST
15 1IWTES
19:15
260.5
212.5
10.46
7.31
6.3
323.3
5.87
9.40
19:1S
252.9
225.0
10.55
7.72
5.9
239.9
5.83
9.57
i ?: i 7
25E.0
223.1
10.62
7.71
5.6
236.5
5.93
9.43
19:16
26c.0
224.5
10.52
7.72
5.8
238.7
5.91
9.26
19:19
266.7
216.6
1C.57
7.68
5.9
272.7
5.99
9.16
19:20
258,5
217.7
10.69
7.58
6.2
293.1
5.91
9.C-5
19:21
254.5
211.6
10.57
7.70
6.4
283.5
5.95
8.99
19:22
249.7
206.3
10.74
7.47
6.3
285.0
5.99
9.00
.9:2?
234.5
163.7
10.61
7.67
7.1
297.4
5.93
8.72
19:24
223.6
168.9
10.69
7.60
7.2
297.2
6.08
8.51
19:2:
217.3
166.9
10.65
7.56
7.4
323.6
6.00
8.41
19:2-3
210.D
157.3
10.78
7.53
7.4
308.4
6.10
8.44
19:27
200.7
171.3
1C.83
7.34
7.0
311.3
5.99
8.37
19;2S
196.0
173.9
10.81
7.52
7.9
316.3
5.90
8.68
19:29
241.0
184.2
10.43
7.86
7.8
317.1
5.99
8.43
19:30
270.7
190.3
10.39
7.93
8.3
321.8
5.99
8.35
AVERASE
VALUES FOR
THE LAST
15 HISUTES
19:30
240.0
194.3
10.63
7.63
6.8
299.8
5.97
0.36
19:31
271.5
185.2
10.44
7.8c
7.7
304.5
6.07
8.31
19:32
274.7
196.2
10.53
7.84
7.2
314.3
5.93
8.5C
19:33
270.2
200.5
10.50
7.70
7.2
236.2
5.97
8.50
19:34
262.3
200.1
10.68
7.47
6.7
292.6
5.94
9.77
19:35
258.0
205.7
10.69
7.59
6.B
292.4
5.89
8.54
19:36
257.4
202.1
10.49
7.84
6.6
273.1
6.01
B. 79
19:37
262.1
212.3
10.56
7.73
6.1
277.1
5.98
9.06
19:36
260.7
212.7
10.39
7.65
5.8
256.1
6.04
9.19
19:39
251.2
212.1
10.90
7.46
6.0
278.9
5.88
9.55
19:40
244.1
212.3
10.79
7.46
6.2
2B5.1
5.81
9.58
19:41
238.8
203.9
10.97
7.40
5.7
270.8
5.90
9.83
19:42
229.5
211.6
11.03
7.21
5.9
291.8
5.80
9.89
19:43
143.9
49.5
11.26
7.35
6.2
278.3
5.05
9.94
E-106
-------
Site 9 Seugc Sludge Inciniraor 06-05-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8 C
HAH10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
zm 4
CHAM 3
BOILER
BOILER
B3ILER BD1LE3
STACK
STACK
STACK
HEARTH
TIKE
DM502
ooihOx
: 32 :
C02
ooiIHC
901 CO
I C02
I 02
19:44
20.3
2.:
11.38
7.39
5.9
292.0
5.81
9.94
19:45
7.2
2.0
11.44
7,40
6.0
2B8.2
5.83
9.90
AVERAGE VALUES F3R THE LAST 15 MINUTES
19:45
216,3
167.6
13,32
7.57
6.4
235.8
5.92
9.2°
ftVcRASc VALJES FOR THE LAST HCUR: 60 MNUTES CF VALID DATA
19:4!
240.3
197.6
10.63
7. c 7
6.7
314.0
5.E7
9.39
19:46
5.2
1,9
11.52
7.3?
6.1
289.6
5.85
10.20
19:47
4.4
1.6
11.57
7.33
6.2
312.1
5.70
1C.24
19:46
3.9
1.7
11.60
7.!8
6.0
291.0
5.83
1C.24
19:49
3.4
l.£
11.67
7.17
o.li
324 .0
5.S6
1C .24
19:5C
3.3
1.7
11.68
7.37
a.4'
317.3
5.75
10.27
19:51
3.0
1.7
11.70
7.33
6.1
307.1
5.31
10.08
19:52
3,0
1.7
U.75
7.35
6.1
321.7
5.77
9.96
19:53
2.9
1.6
11.83
7.34
6.0
296.0
5.36
9.96
19:54
3.0
1.6
11.83
7.35
6.1
316.9
5.75
9.66
19:55
2.7
1.6
11.84
7.33
6.0
294.3
5.36
9.85
19:56
3.0
1.6
11.B4
7.33
6.1
307.9
5.79
9.91
19:57
3.1
1.6
11.85
7.33
6.4
328.3
5.68
10.19
19:58
2.6
1.6
11.86
7.32
6.3
367.3
5.22
10.72
19:5?
2.8
1.1
11.91
7.32
6.3
340.2
5.63
9.99
20: OC
2.5
1.5
11.96
7.32
6.3
302.9
5,89
9.57
AVERfiSE
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MNUTES
20:00
? *
1.7
11.76
7.35
6.2
314.4
5.74
1C.09
20:01
2.5
1.5
12.02
7.30
6.1
320.8
5.81
9.57
20:02
2.4
1.5
12.02
7.30
6.5
317.4
5.78
9.6C
20:03
2.3
1.5
12.03
7.28
6.1
308.1
5.S3
9.45
20:04
2.0
1.5
12.06
7.29
6.4
307.5
5.69
9.27
20:05
2.0
1.5
12.14
7.23
6.1
285.9
6.C3
9.10
20:0o
2.3
1.5
12.28
7.27
6.0
296.1
5.97
9.03
20:07
2.3
1.5
12.37
7.26
6.1
281. £
6.SO
9.12
20:08
2.1
1.5
12.51
7.26
5.5
286.0
5.96
9.12
20:09
1.7
1.5
12.69
7.2*
5.9
285.6
5.54
9.C9
20:10
2.2
1.5
12.90
7.25
6.1
274,2
6.0i
9.10
20:11
1.9
1.5
13.1b
7.24
6.0
290.5
5.92
3.91
20:12
1.8
1.5
13.45
7.24
6.1
275.7
5.93
3.97
20:13
2.0
1.5
13.77
7.22
6.0
286. B
5.93
9.00
20:14
2.3
1.5
14.12
7.22
6.1
276.4
5,94
9.14
20:15
2.0
1.5
14.47
7.22
6.0
267.6
6.03
9.20
AVERAGE VALUES
m THE LAST
15 MNUTES
20:15
2.1
1.5
12. BO
7.26
6.1
290.7
5.93
9.18
20:16
1.9
1.5
14.83
7.21
5.8
275.7
5.90
9.20
20:17
31.5
104.2
12.81
7.59
6.0
271.3
5.92
9.39
20:16
191,4
231.9
10.47
7.85
6.0
290.9
5.82
9.37
20:19
223.4
230.2
7.94
6.2
280.5
5.96
9.46
20:20
226.5
230.2
10.43
7.S3
5.9
279.9
5.35
9.63
20:21
225.9
231.a
10.35
7.87
6.2
281.8
5.92
9.45
20:22
230.7
227.9
10.33
7.94
6.1
269.4
5.97
9.41
E-107
-------
Site 9 !
:emge Sludge Incir.eraor
06-05-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 4
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BGILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
HEARTH
TIME
dmSC2
ootNGx
: 02
I C02
ocrHC
COB CO
I C32
1 02
20:23
230.7
233.2
10.53
7.SO
5.7
279.7
5.81
9.55
20:24
230.6
228.6
10.40
7.82
6.2
279.0
5.76
9.56
20:25
232.2
229.1
10.57
7.75
6.C
2B7.0
5.78
9.76
20:26
232.4
228.5
10.57
7.70
6.2
269.1
5.70
9.82
20:27
-'231.2
227.6
10.71
7.64
5.9
290.5
5.72
9.98
20:28
232.7
228.6
10.63
7.63
6.2
309.4
5.62
9.75
20:29
237.4
224.5
10.51
7.83
6.0
292.4
5.76
9.68
20:30
243.9
227.7
10.57
7.74
6.4
306.3
5.77
9.B4
AVERAGE
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
20:30
200.2
205.7
10.54
7.75
6.1
285.5
5.80
9.59
20:31
245.2
224.7
10.53
7.75
6.2
300.3
5.71
9.71
20:32
250.1
224.4
10.30
3.06
6.0
- 289.2
5.82
9.61
20:33
265.3
227.2
10.09
B.06
5.9
281.0
5.92
9.30
20:34
270.5
222.2
10.21
B.06
6.1
276.4
6.00
9.37
20:35
270.9
224.5
10.19
9.12
5.9
285.5
5.95
9.41
20:36
274.9
221.4
9.99
8.26
5.9
269.6
6.04
9.35
20:37
277.9
224.2
10.11
3.21
6.0
273.6
6.04
9.46
20:38
286.7
224.0
9.76
9.40
5.7
256.6
6.10
9.32
20:39
289.7
122 J
9.99
3.30
5.6
251.4
6.13
9.55
20:40
291.5
230.5
10.09
8.15
5.6
257.9
6.07
9.4E
20:41
283.4
228.5
10.IB
8.11
5.9
260.1
5.99
9.6B
20:42
279.9
231.6
10.31
7.96
5.7
274.9
5.91
9.83
20:43
279.9
226.1
10.00
B.23
6.1
270.2
5.92
9.53
20:44
283.2
226.3
10.22
8.08
6.2
267.5
6.02
9.35
20:45
275.3
222.3
10.45
7.77
6.5
298.9
5.80
9.57
AVERAGE
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
20:45
275.0
225.4
10.16
3.10
5.9
274.1
5.96
9.50
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 60 N1NJTES OF VALID DATA
20:45 120,1 108.6 11.42 7.61 6.1 291.2 5.86 9.5?
20:46
275.4
228. B
10.24
9.09
0
5
287.2
5.84
9.52
20:47
284.1
227.0
10.23
8.02
6
3
283.6
5.79
9.56
20:48
289.7
226.2
10.16
9.10
6
4
264.8
5.95
9.47
20:49
272.9
216.3
11.77
6.68
8
1
352.7
5.64
10.45
20:50
236.8
212.0
12.29
6.33
9
4
391.5
5.13
11.33
20;5l
210.7
206.9
12.64
6.14
9
4
417.3
4.81
12.01
20:52
205.0
209.9
12.34
6.32
9
3
420.2
4.92
11.99
20:53
198.6
203.8
12.92
5.86
8
5
442.0
4.88
12.99
20:54
183.8
202.9
13.14
5.63
8
1
472.0
4.61
13.88
COMENTS: End of Run 9
E-108
-------
CALIBRATION SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage* Sludge Incineraor
REASON: Direct c£»l check after Run 9
DATE : 06-05-1990 TIME: 20:55 - 21:30
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
MONITOR
RESPONSE-
BOILER-
BOILER
ppmS02
ppmS02
0.0
218.0
i .9
226.7
BOILER
BOILER
ppmN0>:
ppmNOa
0.0
240.0
242. 2
BOILER
BOILER
•/. o:
•/. o:
u. 00
12. 50
0.0 5
12.61
10
10
BOILER
BOILER
"/. C02
7. C02
(.). ou
11.01
(.) . <.HJ
.1.03
STACK
STACK
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
0.0
181.2
1 .0
179.0
STACK
STACK
ppm CO
ppm CO
0.0
457 . 5
6.9
458 . 3
STACK-
STACK
7. CO2
*/. C02
o. O'.t
11.01
—o .
-------
CALIBRATION SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Spw^ge Sluctne Incineraor
REASON: Initial direct cal - 6/6/90
DATE 06-06-1990 TIME: 07:40 ~ 08:28
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
BOILER
BOILER-
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER-
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ppmS02
ppmS02
ppmS02
ppmNOx
ppmNOx
7. 02
7. 02
7. 02
0 .0
218.0
361 .4
7 .0
240.0
0 - 00
12.50
20.60
MONITOR
RESPONSE
219. 7
362.6
0.0
239.9
O - 0 5
12. 50
20. 6^'
10
10
10
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
7. C02
7. C02
7. C02
0.00
11.01
17.46
0 . 00
.11 .. 00
17.62
STACK
STACK
STACK
ST ACK
STACK
STACK
HEARTH
HEARTH
HEARTH
pomTHC
ppmTHC
ppm CO
ppm CO
7. C02
Y. C02
7. 02
7. 02
7. 02
0.0
181.2
0.0
4 57. 5
0.00
11 .01
0.00
12. 50
20.60
1.0
1S2. 5
1.3
457 . p.
0.0 5
1 . 04
0 .03
12. 50
20.68
E-iio
-------
site 9 Sewoe Sludge Incineracr 06-06-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 6
CRANIO
CHAN I
CHAN 2
CHAN 4
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BCIL-R
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
ritARTH
'I.IE
ooiS02
umNQx
X 02
: CC2
dc®tHC
:o« CC
; :Q2
X 32
08:31
2.4
0.1
2C.59
0.06
6.9
354.4
5.53
'.56
;8:3:
15.8
37.0
16.75
3.4o
7.8
408.1
5.37
7.82
38:33
M7.5
210.3
a.20
7.11
7.6
418.2
5.40
7.82
08:3*
.99.5
225.4
11.40
6.97
7.6
425.2
5.43
3.C5
06:3:
•09.3
223.0
11.39
7.04
7.3
432.4
5.32
8.39
0£;3s
213.3
229.B
11.28
7.11
7.1
422.7
5.43
3.64
C3:37
212.7
229.8
11.32
7.C7
7.0
409 .fi
5.43
6.9c
;-3:35
21C.7
228.5
11.46
6.97
7.1
416.5
5.38
J.25
38:3*
2C5.9
233.3
11.44
6.98
7.1
414. a
5.3c
9.53
E-lll
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge In:ineraor 06-06-1990
CHAN 6 CHAN 7 CHfil* 8 CHAKIO CHAN 1 CUM 2 CHAN 4 CHAN 3
BOILER BOILER BOILER BOILER STACK STACK STACK HEARTH
TlflE dp»S02 ppiNOx I 02 I C02 psiTHC
08:45
237.8
227.1
10.93
7.47
08:4c
241.3
218.7
11.25
7.05
08:47
239.9
220.2
11.28
7.09
08:48
244.0
219.6
11.02
7.28
08:49
c256.0
223.2
10.07
7.47
08:50
260.3
22C.4
10.83
7.45
08:51
256.3
217.2
11.00
7.29
08:52
252.9
216.2
10.96
7.36
08:53
253.2
212,6
11,03
7.25
08:54
252.5
212.3
11.02
7.29
08:5:
250.1
207.4
11.13
7.14
08:5t
246.9
209.9
11.14
7.18
08:5/
244.3
207.3
11.15
7.14
08:58
247.5
208.7
11.07
7.25
08:59
246.9
208.7
11.01
7.23
09:00
248.6
209.9
11.11
7.25
09:01
251.3
211.3
10,79
7.47
09:02
254.9
210.6
11.00
7.31
09:03
250.4
211.9
10. B8
7.43
09:04
253.2
213.9
10.96
7.31
09:05
255.4
216.0
10.83
7.46
09:0e
253.6
209.9
11.03
7.22
09:07
251.2
210.9
11.01
7.27
09:06
247.4
209.4
11.10
7.13
09:09
242.3
205.5
11.30
7.00
09:10
239.8
203.8
11.28
6.92
09:11
241.6
206.1
11.21
7.09
09:12
242.0
205.9
11.IB
7.06
09:13
241,9
207.9
11.27
7.04
09:14
242.5
208.0
11.07
7.17
09:15
247.9
211.2
11.10
7.18
09: It
250.5
211.7
10.97
7.29
09:17
251.7
212.0
11.00
7.23
09:1b
252.5
213.5
10.89
7.38
09:19
256.6
213.5
10.59
7.56
09:20
264.2
214.6
10.32
7.78
09:21
266.7
215.4
10.31
7.75
09:22
268.5
217.7
10.18
7.91
09:23
275.0
216.0
10.05
7.97
09:24
281.2
220.0
9.99
8.06
09:2?
285.8
222.2
9.70
8.29
09:26
2B8.1
220.1
10.12
7.93
09:27
272.8
217.0
10.41
7.73
09:26
269.3
214.7
10.57
7.5<
09:29
264. e
213.6
10.53
7.63
09:30
261.5
210.6
10.95
7.18
7.2
7.0
7.2
7.1
7.0
6.6
6.8
6.7
6.9
7.1
7.3
7.0
7.2
7.0
6.?
6.?
7.0
6.3
6.9
6.9
6.8
6.8
6.8
7.0
6.9
7.1
7.0
6.8
6.9
6.9
6.8
6.7
6.6
6.4
6.2
6.3
6.1
6.0
5.9
5.9
5.6
5.3
6.3
6.4
6.2
6.2
DP« CO
I C02
I 02
393.2
5.59
9.35
404.7
5.45
9.23
413.2
5.41
9.32
399.4
5.45
9.31
382.2
5.53
8.90
361.5
5.72
8.5!
367.0
5.55
8.65
375.4
5.62
8.75
372.6
5.50
8.80
379.3
5.59
8.82
381.7
5.48
8.82
389,5
5,49
8.93
397.2
5.43
9.03
,3B8.1
5.50
8.94
379.6
5.52
8.94
386.2
5.50
8.95
377.0
5.56
8.94
362.1
5.61
8.90
374.6
5.62
9.02
365.8
5.55
8.83
365.0
5.64
8.86
354.1
5.57
8.80
365.4
5.55
8.92
366.6
5.49
9.10
379.3
5.41
9.29
387,5
5.37
9.33
368,8
5.33
9.35
375.6
5.42
9.39
381.2
5.36
9.37
3B1.7
5.42
9.49
372.6
5.41
9.36
369.8
5.50
9.44
358.9
5.46
9.40
35B.2
5,55
9.37
342.1
5.56
9.22
334.5
5.75
8.79
324.5
5.BO
8.55
324.3
5.80
8.40
309,2
5.92
8.26
303.5
5.93
8.29
297.3
6.04
8.16
2B4.3
6.07
8.15
317.8
5.93
8.74
320.4
5.73
8.92
327.9
5.72
9.13
333.4
5.68
9.44
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 60 MINUTES OF VALID DATA
09:30 236.8
210.5
11.22
7.12
6.8
374.0
5.54
8.94
09:31 251.9
210.2
11.25
7,04
6.5
358.6
5.43
10.25
09:32 244.2
204.4
11.36
6.88
6.5
371.2
5.32
10.56
09:33 242.4
205.5
11.50
6.82
6.6
3B1.4
5,19
¦0.65
09:34 242.7
203.6
11.35
6.90
6.6
385.2
5.27
10.67
E-112
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Inuneraar
06-06-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CHAN10
CHfiN 1
CHAN 2
CHAM 4
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
HEASTf*
TIME
DCfiS02
OCftkGx
2 02
X C02
od«THC
QCI CO
z :o2
I 02
09:35
240.4
200.6
11.57
6.74
6.9
398.6
5.15
10.76
09:36
235.6
200.9
11.49
6.79
6.9
400.8
5.21
a.02
09:37
236.2
199.1
11.61
6.67
7.1
416.9
5.10
10.98
09:36
J36.0
202.0
11.45
6.85
7.3
413.2
5.20
10.89
09:39
237.9
199.4
11.52
6.72
7.4
420.4
5.14
10.76
09:40
239.3
204.4
11.05
7.13
6.7
396.3
5.27
10.34
09:41
245.3
203.2
10.93
7.12
6.7
378.7
5.43
9.81
09:42
246.4
203.9
10.97
7.1?
6.7
373.1
5.47
9.73
09:43
251.6
205.6
10.71
7.33
6.8
364.1
5.53
9.42
09:44
254.5
206.4
1C.74
7.39
6.6
365.4
5.58
9.13
09:45
261.2
206.1
10.55
7.46
6.4
334.9
5.71
8.91
AVERAGE
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
09:45
244.4
203.7
11.20
7.00
6.8
'3B3.9
5.33
10.26
09:46
259.1
207.2
10.67
7.43
6.7
348.2
5.64
8.71
09:4/
261.0
206.4
10.44
7.59
6.5
332.3
5.75
8.61
09:48
260.9
20e.3
10.54
7.53
6.5
341.8
5.69
8.38
09:49
261.3
207.8
10.50
7.54
6.6
328.4
5.82
8.28
09:50
256.1
207.5
10.74
7.36
6.7
345.2
5.66
8.25
09:51
250.8
206.6
10.65
7.46
6.7
352.0
5.69
6.26
09:52
253.9
207.6
10.73
7.36
6.5
346.0
5.64
7.99
09:53
255.0
211.1
10.60
7.49
6.7
346.4
5.71
8.03
09:54
252.6
206.8
10.77
7.28
6.4
330.4
5.65
8.05
09:55
252.7
207.7
10.70
7.40
6.5
354.4
5.62
8.02
09:56
252.3
205.1
10.73
.7.30
6.9
349.8
5.60
8.16
09:57
250.7
206.3
10.79
7.33
6.B
358.2
5.59
8.40
09:58
252.2
205.6
10.67
7.35
6.5
356.5
5.59
£.53
09:59
257.8
210.E
10.55
7.51
6.5
353.2
5.54
8.57
10:00
264.3
209.6
10.37
7.63
6.4
334.4
5.76
8.49
AVERA6E
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
10:00
256.1
207.6
10.63
7.44
6.6
345.2
5.66
8.32
10:01
266.3
211.6
10.46
7.60
6.2
332.6
5.69
e.58
10:02
268.8
213.1
10.23
7.80
6.0
331.0
5.81
8.66
10:03
271.0
211.4
10.43
7.61
6.0
323.2
5.74
8.65
10:04
270.9
212.3
10.34
7.74
5.8
320.5
5.79
8.93
10:05
267.3
208.5
10.56
7.46
6.0
327.5
5.67
9.12
10:06
264.6
212.5
10.43
7.67
6.0
329.3
5.66
9.25
10:07
268.3
212.2
10.43
7.51
5.8
327.8
5.64
9.36
10:06
266.1
213.8
10.43
7.65
5.7
321.7
5.64
9.43
10:09
265.1
211.4
10.49
7.52
5.6
332.6
5.67
9.39
10:10
262.9
211.5
10.56
7,52
6.1
328.5
5.57
9.47
10:11
262.6
212.2
10.44
7.54
6.0
342.6
5.63
9.o0
10:12
261.1
210.9
10.62
7.45
5.9
339.1
5.52
9.62
10:13
263.4
214.4
10.36
7.64
5.8
343.4
5.67
9.62
10:14
265.2
211.5
10.62
7.41
6.0
343.9
5.54
9.57
10:15
263.2
214.0
10.32
7.71
5.9
342.9
5.b6
9.e2
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST
10:15 265,8 212.1
10:1c 265.4 212.3
10:17 263.6 215.1
15 MINUTES
10.45 7.59 5.9
10.58 7.45 5.7
10.37 7.70 5.7
332.4 5.66 9.26
338.5 5.60 9.56
332.3 5.64
E-113
-------
Sit® ? Swage Sludce Incineraor
HUE
13:18
10:1?
1C-: 2C»
lC:2l
10:2!'
10:23
10:24
10:25
!0:2a
10:27
10:25
[0:2=
13:30
CHAN 6
BOILES
3PiS02
266.1
260.6
263.9
262.6
266.5
265./
264.3
261.9
256.4
255.7
264.8
269.4
2e0. ?
CHAN 7
BOILER
c:i*iOx
112.3
212.6
212.4
212.7
211.6
210.8
213.7
212.5
214.4
213.2
216.2
213.4
211.6
cm a
BOILER
Z C2
1C.55
:c.5i
10.43
10.54
10.36
10.58
10.41
10.72
10.52
IC.oS
1C.32
10.42
10.66
C6-06-1990
:hanio CHAN 1
BORES STACK
I C32 cimur.
7.44
7.5ft
7.52
7.53
AVE?Ml VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 IM.NtTES
10:30 263.2 213.0 10.51 7.51
5.5
5.7
5,3
6,C
7.58 5.9
7.4? 5.9
7.57 6.3
7.32 o.2
7.47 o.2
7.32 a.4
7.75 o.3
7.44 o.o
7.43 c.4
CHAN 2
STACK
P" CO
6.C
336.0
32?. 0
330.7
326.0
339.6
342.9
357.7
363.3
363.3
369.2
353.4
337.6
355.3
345.4
CHAN 4 CHAN 3
3*ACK j-EAfiTH
I CO? ; 32
5.59
5.6;
5.61
5.59
5.64
5.56
5.64
5.51
5.55
5.44
5.63
5.67
5.el
9.65
9.61
9.61
9.6c
9.67
9.67
9.65
'.83
?.88
9.76
9.33
8.87
9.0C
9.57
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST NCUR: 60 MINUTES OF VALID DATA
10:30 257.3 209.1 10.70 7.33 6.3 351.7 5.56 9.35
10:3; 259.2 206.7 10.57 7.33 6.5 358,6 5.6q 5 24
10:3i 263.4 207. 5 10. 55 7. 54 i.4 356.8 5.6t> 9 00
10:33 271.J 202.4 10.22 7.70 6.7 353.5 5 79 3-3
10:34 2SI.3 201.3 10.20 7.71 6.4 374.4 5.77 7 el
10:35 234.3 195.6 10.05 7.39 6.3 355.3 5,03 7,u
10:3o 293.6 195.3 10.14 7.82 7.0 393.1 5^35 6*43
10:3/ 295.0 193.1 10.30 7.65 3.0 389.3 5.91 5.52
10:38 273.2 193.5 10.39 7.55 3.3 433.7 5.64 6.55
10:39 232.4 195.5 10.13 7.07 3.9 410.4 5.77 5.3?
10:40 285.8 194.2 10.20 7.66 9.2 411.1 5.93 6.23
10:41 277*8 198-! 10.32 7.68 9.2 413.3 5.77 6 30
10:42 276.1 197.9 10.29 7.64 9.2 389.
10:43 268.5 197.4 10.56 7.41 8.8 409.2 5.66
10:44 265.7 190.1 10.41 7.57 3.2 385.3
10:45 268.3 201.2 10.41 7.55 3.0 404.3 5.i
AVERAGE VALUES FJR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
10:45 276.1 198.6 10.32 7.64
5.77 6.22
6.29
5.67 6.29
6.20
390.1 5.75 6.98
10:46
270.8
200.4
10.36
7.57
7.8
371.6
5.77
6.17
10:47
265.0
199.6
10.63
7.33
8.3
406.1
5.67
6.48
10:48
253.9
195,1
10.70
7.26
3.4
*01.1
5.56
6.74
10:49
253.7
199.4
10.72
7.26
0.7
418.7
5.50
6.85
10:50
252.7
190.4
10.70
7.27
0.2
398.6
5.53
10:51
251.5
198.5
10.75
7.20
8.7
414.8
5.48
0.50
10:52
249.2
200.9
10.74
7.28
8.4
422.6
5.47
12.24
1C: 53
251.2
199.3
10.66
7.29
8.4
*01.7
5.51
12.42
10:54
252.6
199.1
10.75
7.26
3.3
415.3
5.50
7.69
10:55
253.8
199.0
10.62
7.33
3.1
392.6
5.55
7.34
10:56
255.9
198.9
10.61
7.37
7.7
410.9
5.52
7.33
1C:57
260. 8
199.5
11.41
1.95
7.6
386.2
5.61
7.11
10:58
264.4
200.5
12.04
0.00
7.6
405.5
5.57
7.13
10:59
265.5
19B.3
3.39
8.67
7.3
377.0
5.66
7.06
11:00
265.7
198.6
0.07
U.04
7.3
405.7
5.61
7.02
E-114
-------
Site 9 Seuoe Sludg? Incineracr
06-06-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 9
CHANlO
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 4
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
stack
HEALTH
Tlflf
DCIS02
oaiNQx
X 02
; CQ2
odiTHC
2D« CO
; co 2
Z 02
11:02
262.7
195.6
3.74
6.76
7.5
422.5
5.SI
7.04
11:03
264.3
198.1
12.24
0.01
7.2
402,4
5.60
7.05
11:04
265.2
196.3
12.50
0.00
7.7
413.4
5.62
5.35
11:05
263.fi
196.1
11.44
5.5B
7.6
419.4
5.59
7.05
11:06
261.5
195.2
1C.92
7.40
3.0
417.4
5.55
7.16
11:07
262.7
194.8
10.99
7.36
8.0
425.7
5.55
6.96
11:08
265.0
193.3
10.84
7.49
8.0
401.3
5.59
6.81
11:3«
264.o
194.3
10.93
7.39
8.4
423.0
5.54
6.o7
11:10
264.1
193.5
10.9]
7.45
6.0
393.5
5.64
6.67
11:1;
263.5
194.8
10.91
7.43
8.5
419.9
5.57
6.54
2e5.3
194.3
10.SO
7.53
8.1
394.3
5.61
6.64
8.3
410.7
5.62
6.46
11:14
164.6
62.2
10.59
6.80
8.3
404.0
5.53
a. 59
11:15
115.9
150.3
10.84
7.33
3.3
403 .7
5.60
£.45
AVERAGE
jaljes for the LAST
15 MINUTES
11:15
248.6
183.4
9.93
6.47
8.0
403.0
5.59
6.79
illio
258.7
199.9
10.06
7.69
7.9
391.3
5.67
6.24
11:17
269.7
190.9
10.79
7.52
7.6
371.6
5.76
6.OS
11:19
263.9
199.6
10.53
7.44
7.9
395.8
5.66
6.35
11:19
262.8
197.0
10.86
7.50
7.9
3BO.O
5.63
6.32
11:20
2o5.C
198.9
10.89
7.45
396.6
5.64
6.31
11:21
264.7
197.8
10.81
7.53
7.3
375.8
5.66
6.34
11:22
262 .6
1«8.7
10.93
7.40
7.6
392.3
5.64
6.52
11:23
263.9
198.1
10.76
7.60
7.5
369.7
5.64
6.58
11:24
267.9
200.6
10.BO
7.52
7.4
376.6
5.66
i.y
11:25
268.9
197.1
10.74
7.59
7.1
358.5
5.71
11:26
270.3
198.6
10.67
7.65
7.6
379.0
5.66
16.71
11:27
275.9
199.7
10.62
7.74
360.3
5.74
17.90
11:26
276.2
199.1
1C .67
7.61
7.1
363.4
5.72
17.65
11:2?
269.6
¦98.5
10.85
7.55
7.1
374.7
5.70
17.71
11:30
270.1
196.9
10.75
7.56
7.6
371.7
5.62
17.90
AVERA6E 'ALLIES FOR THE CAST 15 HINlTES
11:30 267.4 198.5 10.78
7.56
7.5
377.1
5.67
10,17
AVERSE VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 60 MINUTES OF VALID DATA
11:30 262.5 194.9 10.16 7.12 7.9 394.4 5.65 7.65
11:31
268.7
198.2
10.87
7.46
7.4
335.1
5.59
18.11
11:32
265.7
196.7
10.37
7.47
7.5
163.5
5.61
10.19
11:33
263.3
199.0
1C.89
7.41
7.4
390.8
5.54
18.43
11:34
260.4
197.7
10.91
7.40
7.3
370.9
5.55
19.70
11:35
259.7
199.3
10.95
7.35
7.4
394.9
5.53
20.52
11:36
256.6
195.1
11.00
7.32
7.4
371.2
5.56
20.62
11:37
253.0
196.5
11.14
7.20
7.7
394.8
5.45
20.63
11:38
253.6
194.5
11.00
7.33
7.1
381.6
5.49
20.63
11:39
258.1
195.6
10.98
7.34
7.6
387.3
5.50
20.64
11:40
260.3
197.B
10.93
7.42
7.2
380.2
5.56
20.64
11:41
259.2
196.5
10.97
7.36
7.1
366.6
5.59
20.65
11:42
256.6
197.2
10.99
7.35
7.3
376.9
5.58
20.65
11:43
256.0
194.5
11.07
7.25
7.2
364.3
5.53
20.65
11:44
255.1
197.9
11.07
7.25
7.5
378.3
5.49
20.65
E-115
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Intineraor
06-06-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 6
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
OiAM 4
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
HEARTH
TIME
op*SG2
do«NOx
I 02
I CG2
cd«THC
DC* CO
X C02
I 32
11:45
253.0
194.5
11.15
7.19
7.0
364.6
5.51
20.65
AVERAGE
VALUES FOR THE LAST
15 HINUTES
11:45
258.8
196.7
10.99
7.34
7.3
37B.4
5.54
20.10
11:46
¦250.2
197.1
11.10
7.20
7.4
385.5
5.48
20.65
11:47
250.7
197.5
11.10
7.24
7.2
372.5
5.46
18.33
11:45
252.3
200.5
11.06
7.27
7.3
370.1
5.51
9.74
11:49
251.9
198.0
11.08
7.23
7.2
369.3
5.49
7.78
11:50
250.4
202.4
11.13
7.22
7.1
373.5
5.45
7.61
11:51
252.2
200.3
11.06
7.25
6.9
365.7
5.52
7.56
11:52
254.1
203.4
11.00
7.36
7.1
361.6
5.50
7.59
11:53
260.4
2C6.0
10.32
7.49
6.7
348.9
5.63
7.67
11:54
259.3
203.9
10.97
7.32
7.0
351.6
5.57
7.70
11:55
259.8
205.5
10.34
7.51
6.3
357.B
5.60
7.74
11:56
257.7
201.8
10.80
7.47
6.9
338.2
5.63
7.44
11:57
261.3
201.5
10.75
7.57
6.9
352.2
5.67
7.31
11:55
259.8
200.5
10.81
7.49
6.6
335.1
5.72
7.28
11:59
256.8
200.5
10.81
7.49
6.7
357.7
5.64
7.25
12:00
257.9
197.5
10.83
7.45
6.7
348.4
5.68
7.12
AVERA6E VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
12:00 255.6 201.1 10.94 7.37
7.0
359.2
5.57
9.25
12:01
255.9
200.0
10.32
7.50
6.3
369.9
5.57
7.14
12:02
258.5
198.6
10.67
7.58
6.7
347.5
5.70
6.84
12:03
260.7
198.7
10.75
7.53
7.0
360.0
5.67
6.64
12:04
263.8
200.3
10.61
7.69
6.8
345.0
5.73
6.53
12:05
265.9
199.2
10.67
7.59
7.0
354.4
5.72
6.37
12:06
265.3
199.6
10.71
7.63
6.8
356.2
5.73
6.55
12:07
263.7
195.8
10.74
7.53
7.0
354.5
5.68
6.58
12:08
261.6
196.1
10.B3
7.51
6.6
374.9
5.62
6.62
12:09
260.4
194.0
10.76
7.50
7.1
364.4
5.65
6.57
12:10
259.0
196.1
10.70
7.62
6.9
385.8
5.56
6.65
12:11
272.8
193.4
10.50
7.73
6.7
344.7
5.80
6.31
12:12
275.7
193.8
10.64
7.64
6.9
379.9
5.73
6.51
12:13
276.3
195.5
10.51
7.80
6.6
356.9
5.BO
6.11
12:14
280.1
198.3
10.66
7.63
6.8
362.6
5.B2
5.86
12:15
271.1
196.3
10.67
7.62
6.7
355.4
5.76
6.03
AVERA6E
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
12:15
266.1
197.0
10.68
7.61
6.8
360.8
5.70
6.49
12:16
271.4
200.2
10.56
7.71
7.0
356.8
5.73
6.10
12:17
270.5
199.7
10.75
7.57
6,9
354.1
5.77
6.37
12:16
260.8
196.9
10,83
7.44
7,1
348.8
5.61
6.48
12:19
259.9
198.8
10.76
7.55
6.8
362.7
5.66
6.45
12:20
264.1
198.8
10.58
7.66
6.B
336.3
5.71
6.15
12:21
268.0
199.3
10.59
7.69
6.7
350.3
5.69
5.96
12:22
267.1
199.7
10.59
7.69
6.6
325.1
5.75
5.39
12:23
268.0
200.7
10.57
7.68
6.6
343.6
5.70
6.13
12:24
269.7
199.5
10.50
7.78
6,3
328.3
5.77
5.87
12:25
270.0
200.2
10.76
7.48
6.8
347.4
5.73
6,24
12:26
254.0
193.7
10.96
7.34
7.2
367.2
5.60
6.75
12:27
252.5
197.2
10.88
7.36
7.3
404.1
5.50
6.96
E-116
-------
Site 9 '
Seiiage Sludoe Incineraor
06-06-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CKAN10
CHAN 1
OAN 2
CHAN 4
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
HEARTH
TIME
DDaS02
ooiNOx
Z 02
X CQ2
ddcTHC
DDI CO
I C02
: 02
12:28
250.8
199.6
10.59
7.7C
6.9
366.0
5.63
6.35
12:2?
275.4
197.8
10.48
7.75
6.8
339.4
5.73
6.57
12:30
283.5
196.5
10.42
7.90
6.3
342.3
5.82
6.34
AVERAGE
VALUES FDR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
12:30
;,266.2
198.5
10.65
7.62
6.9
351.5
5.69
6.34
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 60 MINUTES OF VALID DATA
12:30
261.7
198.3
10.82
7.49
7.0
362.5
5.63
10.54
12:31
282.8
200.2
10.60
7.61
6.9
338.0
5.97
6.28
12:32
266.5
196.2
10.91
7.36
7.3
377.4
5.61
6.74
12:35
255.4
197.3
10.97
7.25
7.1
360.0
5.60
6.93
12:34
243.3
190.5
11.56
6.79
7.7
423.5
5.41
7.65
12:35
236.4
191.3
11.59
6.78
8.4
434.5
5.27
7.9C
12:36
224.0
190.2
12.16
6.32
8.2
464.3
5.08
9.87
12:37
226.6
181.6
12.05
6.35
8.8
503.1
4.98
9.75
12:38
198.8
167.0
12.88
5.71
11.5
599.4
4.68
9.44
12:3?
180.5
165.0
12.83
5.78
11.6
635.6
4.29
9.93
12:40
192.2
173.4
12.27
6.19
10.4
583.7
4.44
9.42
12:41
207.6
181.3
11.96
6.46
9.3
510.0
4.74
8.96
12:42
216.4
180.4
11.70
6.61
B.7
484.3
4.93
9.44
12:43
225.6
182.*
11.58
6.70
8.4
469.5
5.09
B.04
12:44
230.3
179.6
11.49
6.75
8.5
456.7
5.15
7.96
12:45
226.2
176.8
11.66
6.59
8.7
495.5
5.13
8.06
AVERAGE
VALUES FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
12:45
227.5
183.6
11.75
6.62
8.8
475.8
5.09
8,36
12:46
223.9
174.1
11.6B
6.62
9.1
505.2
5.08
8.31
12:47
225.0
177.1
11.55
6.73
9.1
527.1
5.08
8.51
12:48
229.9
178.3
11.44
6.91
8.8
500.5
5.17
B. 50
12:4?
235.9
184.0
11.20
6.99
8.5
488.1
5.25
0.44
12:50
245.8
185.8
10.91
7.28
8.5
464.6
5.42
B.24
12:51
259.7
193.9
10.73
7.50
7.9
434.8
5.58
7.97
12:52
271.8
201.2
10.OB
8.06
7.6
407.3
5.81
7.64
12:53
208.8
206.9
9.60
8.43
6.9
345,4
6.12
7.11
12:54
299.7
208.3
9.32
B.68
6.6
314.0
6.30
6.47
12:55
302.4
213.1
9.39
B.59
6.5
279.6
6.42
6.46
12:56
303.3
217.5
9.37
8.63
6.1
275.2
6.43
6.49
12:57
296.0
218.8
9.87
8.21
5.7
260.0
6.34
6.57
12:56
203.9
219.8
10.15
B.08
5.8
283.5
6.11
7.00
12:59
279.3
218.1
10.16
8.06
5.7
279.5
6.04
7.12
13:00
2B0.8
218.0
10.17
8.04
5.9
291.3
6.02
7.12
AVERAGE
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
13:00
26B.4
201.0
10.3B
7.70
7.2
377.2
5.82
7.46
13:01
275,2
215.6
10.27
7.94
5.7
287.4
6.07
7.13
13:02
275.6
219.3
10.20
8.04
5.7
297.5
5.97
7.C9
13:03
274.5
217.6
10.25
7.95
5.7
292.9
6,05
7.07
13:0*
263.3
215.4
10.56
7.67
5.8
307.2
5.88
7.12
13:05
262.6
216.6
10.54
7.75
5.8
307.4
5.87
7.36
13:06
259.5
213.8
10.6B
7.55
5.9
301.0
5.74
7.11
E-117
-------
Sits 9 Sewage Siudoe Incineraar
06-06-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CHAN1Q
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 4
cm 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
HEALTH
TI?*E
dd»SC2
o:»NOx
I 02
I C02
ocuTHC
oo« CO
1 C02
I 02
13:07
258.4
211.3
10.74
7.51
6.0
314.7
5.79
6.95
13:06
253.0
207.2
11.00
7.28
6.2
327.1
5.66
7.11
13:09
241.1
204.6
11.17
7.11
6.9
373.B
5.54
7.49
13:10
235.6
201.0
11.25
7.01
6.9
379.5
5.42
7.56
13:11
=233.2
200.3
11.2B
6.98
7.1
411.7
5.36
7.72
13:12
"230.3
199.1
11.32
6.95
7.0
406.9
5.33
7.79
13:13
234.7
203.9
11.04
7.20
7.3
427.3
5.36
7.83
13:14
240.3
203.6
10.61
7.45
6.6
374.6
5.59
7.53
13:15
245.7
208.8
10.65
7.46
6.4
356.6
5.66
7.45
AVERAGE
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
13:15
252.6
209.3
10.77
7.46
6.3
344.5
5.69
7.35
13:1b
249.4
209.2
10.42
7.66
6.2
345.3
5.73
7.52
13:17
252.9
210.9
10.41
7.69
6.4
33B.9
5.80
7.25
13:16
255.1
211.2
10.35
7.76
6.4
343.4
5.91
7.04
13:1?
260.8
213.6
10.23
7.81
6.2
323.8
5.86
6.98
13:20
266.3
215.1
10.02
B.04
6.0
316.1
5.98
6.78
13:21
272.2
214.4
9.99
B.03
5.9
295.3
6.08
6.51
13:22
273.2
218.8
9.96
B.12
5.9
301.8
6.09
6.48
13:23
277.4
219.0
9.80
B.24
5.6
284.5
6.10
6.36
13:24
283.2
218.6
9.69
8.31
5.4
277.7
6.19
6.11
13:25
286.4
217.0
9.72
8.29
5.4
263.2
6.26
5.89
13:26
284.3
218.9
9.86
8.22
5.6
268.5
6.23
5.86
13:27
261.9
214.9
9.86
8.15
5.4
263.5
6.20
6.09
13:28
277.6
215.7
10.09
7.99
5.5
268.7
6.10
6.26
13:29
276.9
213.3
10.00
8.06
5.5
269.8
6.05
6.13
13:30
275.6
212.9
10.52
7.66
6.0
285.3
5.95
6.33
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST
15 HINUTES
13:30
271.5
214.9
10.06
8.00
5.8
296.4
6.03
6.51
AVERA6E VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 60 MINUTES OF
VALID DATA
13:30
255.0
202.2
10.74
7.46
7.0
373.5
5.66
7.42
13:31
26B.5
214.4
10.60
7.65
5.8
306.0
5.01
6.65
13:32
262.9
211.2
10.67
7.51
6.2
316.6
5.72
6.74
13:33
259.4
210.2
10.84
7.41
6.0
337.1
5.66
6.96
13:34
258.8
207.5
10.63
7.57.
6.2
328.8
5.63
6.73
13:35
261.3
207.7
10.79
7.41
6.2
348.2
5.66
6.72
13:36
257.9
207.1
10.84
7.40
6.4
332.6
5.64
6.B7
13:37
256.7
209.6
10.79
7.43
6.3
358.7
5.59
6.92
13:38
256.8
206.7
10.76
7.43
6.3
333.7
5.65
6.72
13:39
255,8
206.4
10.88
7.33
6.3
354.8
5.61
6,74
13:40
253.3
203.3
10.94
7.26
6.5
350.9
5.57
6.03
13:41
252.1
206.3
10.96
7.24
6.8
365.2
5.52
6.92
13:42
249.6
204.9
10.97
7.24
6.4
352.9
5.51
7.18
13:43
24B.4
203.2
11.03
7.18
6.7
360.7
5.52
7.1V
13:44
246.8
205.2
11.07
7.17
6.5
365.2
5.45
7.26
13:45
246.9
202.4
10.97
7.23
6.7
355.3
5.49
7.11
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 hIMJTES
13:45
255.7
207.1
10.85
7.36
6.4
344.4
5.60
6.90
E-118
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludoe Incineraor 06-06-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 6
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 4
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
sta:k
HEARTH
TINE
odiSQ2
ooiNOx
I 02
I C02
ociTHC
DDI CG
I C02
Z C2
13:46
246.8
207.2
10.94
7.28
6.5
365.4
5.52
7.11
13:47
249.6
203.1
10.93
7.23
6.9
349.6
5.53
7.14
13:46
249.4
205.7
10.93
7.26
6.7
369.5
5.55
7.10
13:49
250.9
206.7
10.88
7.35
6.6
352.9
5.54
7.12
13:50
;,256.4
209.7
10.73
7.39
6.9
352.7
5.65
7.12
13:51
"253.8
207.9
10.93
7.26
6.7
34B.B
5.58
7.26
13:52
251.5
209.2
10.89
7.32
6.9
355.0
5.60
7.40
13:53
253.5
209.3
10.76
7.40
6.8
352.7
5.61
7.4B
13:54
257.5
212.4
10.79
7.42
6.9
343.2
5.66
7.52
13:55
258.3
211.5
10.70
7.4B
6.6
34B.2
5.68
7.56
13:5o
259.1
213.7
10.75
7.49
6.6
345.2
5.64
7.56
13:57
260.5
213.0
10.73
7.48
'6.8
341.1
5.73
7.64
13:58
260.2
213.6
10.74
7.46
6.7
336.8
5.64
7.73
13:59
262.9
21B.2
10.43
7.73
6.4
338.4
5.73
7.79
14:00
271.9
216.5
10.40
7.75
6.1
312.0
5.85
7.67
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
14:00
256.1
210.5
10.78
7.42
6.7
347.4
5,64
7.41
COMrtENTS: End of Run ? 4 Run 10
Run __
Run 10 s - :
E-119
-------
O^L_ I T I OM SUNMAF«: V
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineracr
REASON: Direct cal check after Run ? & Run 10
DATE : 06-06-1990 TIME: 14:01 - 14:33
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
MONITOR
RESPONSE
BOILER
BOILER
ppmSO;
ppmSO!
o. o
213.0
1 .6
'(*)! j . 2
BOILER
BOILER
ppmNG;:
ppmNOx
0.0
240.0
1.6
BOILER
BOILER
7. 02
7. 02
0.00
12.50
(j. 06
12.36
10
10
BOILER
BOILER
7. C02
V. C02
(.). cj(.)
11.01
-0.01
11.03
STACK
STACK
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
0.0
181.2
1.0
178.4
STACK
STACK
ppm CO
ppm CO
0.0
457. 5
/ . o
463.5
STACK
STACK
7. C02
*/. C02
0.00
11.01
-0.05
10.89
HEARTH
HEARTH
y. o:
7. o:
0 .00
12 . 50
0 . 06
12.35
E-120
-------
CAL I EeFt^-r I Ors4 SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor
REASON: Direct cal of analyzers after adjustments
DATE : 06-06-1990 TIME: 14:33 - 14:43
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
MONITOR
RESPONSE
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ppmSOl
ppmSQl!
ppmNO:
ppmNO:
0.0
: 18 . O
0. o
!40 .0
2.4
217.4
1 . 4
240.8
E-121
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Inuneracr
06-06-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 4
CHAN 3
PDILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
HEARTH
TIME
do«SQ2
ddiNQx
I 02
I CO?
OOiTHC
co* CO
I C02
X 02
15:15
291.7
210.0
10.59
7.62
8.0
416.6
5.76
6.72
15:h
296.6
205.8
10.67
7.56
8.1
5B3.0
5.79
6.71
15:17
297.6
207.1
10.59
7.61
G.l
410.6
5.74
6.68
15:13
2S9.0
203.0
10.69
7.51
7.7
394.7
5.74
e.cS
15:1?
i'294.9
204.5
10.7B
7.45
8.5
435.5
5.65
6.77
15:20
291.0
200.9
10.83
7.35
8.5
423.6
5.62
6.95
15:21
263.6
2C0.1
10.96
7.27
8.B
458.3
5.54
7.33
15:22
263.0
198.9
11.00
7.22
9.2
459.8
5.49
7.54
15:23
278.0
198.2
11.02
7.20
9.2
466.4
5.46
7.37
15:24
280.7
199.2
10.9?
7.26
9.1
465.4
5.48
7.54
15:25
279.5
197.8
10.99
7.23
9.0
451.0
5.51
7.60
15:2s
282.2
199.3
11.01
7.22
9.0
471.2
5.51
7.29
15:27
277.5
196.1
11.10
7.13
9.1
450.9
5.52
7.31
15:28
271.6
197.0
11.17
7.05
9.2
435.1
5.41
7.32
15:2?
275.9
196.3
11.06
7.17
9.0
447.1
5.42
7.25
15:30
275.7
196.5
11.03
7.17
9.2
430.1
5.42
6.96
AVERAGE VALUES
FOR THE LAST 15 IUNUTES
15:30
284.5
200.0
10.93
7.29
8.8
445.5
5.55
7,15
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 16 MNUTES OF VALID DATA
15:30
284.9
200.7
10.91
7.31
8.7
443.7
5.57
7.13
15:31
279.7
195.1
11.06
7.16
8.6
449.6
5.52
6.78
15:32
278.2
199.8
11.02
7.22
'9.1
480.4
5.48
6.67
15:33
282.2
198.0
10.86
7.33
8.7
449.0
5.49
6.80
15:3*
289.9
202.9
10.78
7.44
8.3
436.3
5.65
6.65
15:35
285.8
200.3
10.95
7.26
8.0
419.8
5.65
6.62
15:36
284.2
206.5
10.81
7.40
8.4
430.2
5.62
6.61
15:37
285.4
205.0
10.93
7.26
8.3
410.6
5.65
6.56
15:36
277.7
211.4
10.88
7.31
8.2
421.2
5.64
6.73
15; 39
279.6
207.5
11.03
7.17
8.3
401.8
5.56
6.66
15:40
274.0
207.2
11.11
7.05
8.6
428.0
5.56
6.99
15:41
268.2
204.9
11.24
6.99
8.6
423.3
5.41
7.26
15:42
268.5
206.7
11.19
7.01
9.1
441.3
5.46
7.32
15:43
268.2
205.2
11.30
6.93
8.9
425.8
5.35
7.42
15:44
263.6
207.6
11.23
6.97
8.9
455.5
5.37
7.66
15:4:
267.2
207.6
11.17
7.05
8.5
428.4
5.35
7.47
AVERAGE
VALUES FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
15:45
276.8
204.4
11.04
7.17
8.6
433.4
5.52
6.96
15:4*
271.3
212.0
11.01
7.IB
8.7
437.8
5.49
7.56
15:47
27B.4
210.4
10.99
7.20
8.2
394.1
5.52
7.24
15:46
278.3
210.6
10.96
7.22
8.4
414.4
5.57
7.31
15:49
274.5
208.1
11.09
7.10
8.5
406.7
5.49
7.27
15:50
272.9
209. E
11.03
7.16
8.4
413.1
5.55
7.26
15:51
271.3
209.3
11.14
7.05
8.1
402.2
5.48
7.36
15:52
270.8
208.6
11.04
7.14
8.0
399.5
5.51
7,51
15:53
271.8
209.1
11.11
7.13
8.2
404.0
5.46
7.46
15:54
270.2
207.7
11.10
7.06
8.2
407,6
5.45
7.49
15:55
273.7
208.7
11.11
7.11
8.4
412.6
5.48
7.30
15:5c
276.0
206.2
11.02
7.12
8.0
397.7
5.44
7.36
E-122
-------
Sits 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor 06-06-1990
CHAN 6 CHAN 7 CHAN 8 CHAN1C CHAN 1 CHAN 2 CHAN 4 CHAN 3
BOILER BOILER BOILER BOILER STACK STACK STACK HEARTH
TIME 0P«SQ2 pptNOx I 02 I C02 opiTHC dpi CO I C02 Z 3?
15:57
273.7
205.2
11.23
6.98
8.1
405.6
5.45
7.40
15:58
266.3
202.4
11,30
6.88
8.5
412.7
5.33
7.45
15:59
263.2
205.3
11.35
6.86
8.7
444.7
5.33
7.63
16:00
261.7
200.1
11.36
6.86
8.2
431.3
5.26
7.66
AVERAGE
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
16:00
271.6
207.6
11.12
7.07
B.3
412.3
5.45
7.42
16:01
262.2
203.0
11.29
6.89
8,7
449.2
5.32
7.65
16:02
263.6
199.2
11.36
6.85
8.5
425.4
5.30
7.66
16:03
264.0
205.3
11.23
6.96
8.9
451.3
5.31
7.60
16:04
266.0
202.7
11.30
6.91
B.3
420.4
5.37
7.63
16:05
265.1
207.6
11.25
6.92
B.5
447.6
5.3B
7.70
16:06
264.0
205.8
11.30
6.91
8.3
412.8
5.32
7.60
16:07
263.4
209.4
11.30
6.89
9.4
427.1
5.40
7.78
16:06
263.2
206.8
11.34
6.86
8.1
413.1
5.29
7.79
16:09
267.3
209.0
11.14
7.05
B.O
410.5
5.40
7.78
16:ld
270.8
207.1
11.21
7.00
7.9
385.7
5.45
7.61
16:11
273.9
211.7
10.97
7.22
8.1
405.1
5.47
7.50
16:12
279.1
211.3
11.00
7.19
7.7
378.3
5.54
7.40
16:13
279.1
213.7
10.93
7.26
7.7
377.5
5.62
7.38
16:14
278.7
212.5
10.94
7.27
7.5
367.3
5.55
7.40
16:15
281.2
212.3
10.92
7.24
7.8
379.3
5.56
7.52
AVERAGE
VALUES
FOR
THE LAST
15 MINUTES
16:15
269.4
207.8
11.17
7.03
8.2
410.0
5.42
7.50
16:16
278.0
217.3
10.96
7.29
7.7
379.9
5.51
7.54
16:17
278.9
214.2
10.93
7.23
7.3
373.2
5.60
7.51
16:18
27B.3
218.5
10.97
7.29
7.7
377.3
5.59
7.50
16:19
276.6
215.7
11.00
7.16
7.3
367.5
5.58
7.57
16:20
273.8
217.0
11.04
7.19
7.8
379.1
5.54
7.72
16:21
274.9
214.6
11.04
7.15
7.4
367. i
5.50
7.71
16:22
276.4
217.2
10.97
7.24
7.7
378.2
5.56
7.65
16:23
274.3
213.3
11.12
7.07
7.6
372.6
5.52
7.59
16:24
272.7
216.4
11.03
7.16
7.9
391.B
5.51
7.62
16:25
270.2
213.7
11.06
7.14
7.5
367.3
5.51
7.58
16:26
277.1
215.6
11.02
7.16
7.8
389,3
5.50
7.64
16:27
279.8
212.8
11.03
7.19
7.7
373.7
5.46
7.50
16:28
285.7
215.0
10.87
7.28
7,9
395.2
5.50
7.56
16:29
280.7
210.2
11.10
7,10
7.9
383.8
5.44
7.65
16:30
274.4
209.6
11.06
7.13
7.7
400.6
5.51
7.60
AVERAGE
VALUES FOR
THE LAST
15 MINUTES
16:30
277.3
214.7
11.01
7.IB
7.7
379.B
5.52
7.60
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 60 MINUTES OF VALID DATA
16:30
273.0
208.6
11.08
7.11
8.2
408.9
5.48
7.40
16:31
274.5
205.7
11.12
7.07
0.0
394.2
5.40
7.54
16:32
271.4
206.9
11.10
7.11
8.2
423.2
5.44
7.48
16:33
272.7
203.8
11.09
7,10
7.9
404.2
5.44
7.29
16:34
275.2
204.9
11.09
7.12
8.1
427.2
5.44
7.21
16:35
276.5
200.9
11.09
7.13
7.9
411.3
5.45
6.99
E-123
-------
Site 9 Se*age Sludoe Incineraor 06-06-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CfcAN 8
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 4
CHAN J
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
HEARTH
TINE
dd>SQ2
ddbSOi
I 02
Z C02
ooilHC
ooc CO
I C02
I 02
16:36
278.1
203.2
11.07
7.12
8.2
432.9
5.46
6.87
16:37
279.4
202.5
11.03
7.17
8.2
413.8
5.43
6.64
16:36
230.7
206.9
10.96
7.20
6.4
433.6
5.48
6.71
16:3 9
278.9
202.5
11.09
7.12
8.2
400.5
5.47
6.75
16: 4C
275.1
206.0
11.06
7.09
8.5
442.3
5.44
6.71
16:41
=272.5
203.6
11.24
7.00
8.2
415.4
5.40
7.02
16:42
"270.6
206.5
11.14
7.04
8.7
431.7
5.38
7.08
16:43
272.0
204.0
11.20
7.00
8.0
406.4
5.35
7.05
16:44
269.0
208.0
11.20
7.02
8.5
427.5
5.41
7.10
16:45
269.7
205.2
11.18
6.99
8.1
407.7
5.32
7.17
AVERAGE
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
16:45
274.4
204.7
11.11
7.09
8.2
418.1
5.42
7.04
16:46
271.6
211.1
11.03
7.19
8.5
409.7
5.45
6.82
16:47
273.3
207.:
11.14
7.04
7.9
393.6
5.42
6.90
16:48
269.0
210.2
11.18
7.04
6.B
407.4
5.40
7.15
16:49
268.6
210.1
11.13
7.06
8.4
407.9
5.36
7.23
16:50
272.1
211.0
11.04
7.18
8.1
387.9
5.46
7.10
16:51
273.3
213.6
10.98
7.23
7.5
386.0
5.46
7.10
16:52
274.4
211.6
11.00
7.18
7.6
369.4
5.49
7.25
16:53
273.1
214.1
10.94
7.24
7.6
381.4
5.47
7.11
16:54
282.7
215.8
10.76
7.44
7.3
358.6
5.61
6.67
16:55
286.8
214.3
10.63
7.52
7.1
347.1
5.65
6.88
16:56
291.4
219.1
10.44
7.74
6.9
329.4
5.80
6.32
16:57
297.2
216.7
10.46
7.71
6.6
321.8
5.83
6.23
16:59
299.2
219.0
10.35
7.78
6.9
338.2
5.83
6.20
16:59
307.2
216.5
10.26
7.92
6.6
313.7
5.91
6.04
17:00
312.0
219.0
10.10
6.01
6.6
332.1
5.97
5.75
AVERAGE VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 HINUTES
17:00
283,5
213.9
10.76
7.42
7.5
365.6
5,61
6.72
17:01
317.7
218.3
10.02
8.11
6.5
304.8
6.07
5.45
17:02
320.7
218.7
10.02
8.10
6.6
314.4
6.12
5.47
17:03
321.8
222.9
10.01
8.17
6.7
308.2
6.16
5.55
17:04
322.8
219.4
9.97
8.16
6.5
297.0
6.17
5.45
17:05
321.2
226.3
9.91
8.19
6.4
300.2
6.22
5.44
17:06
325.4
224.9
9.78
8.37
6.4
282.7
6.20
5.20
17:07
338. B
224.8
9.56
0.53
6.1
279.7
6.35
5.04
17:08
344.0
224.6
9.61
8.45
6.2
261.6
6.38
4.91
17:09
337.0
224.2
9.76
8.34
6.1
263.6
6.32
5.14
17:10
335.2
227.9
9.79
8.34
6.0
265.2
6.28
5.21
17:11
329.1
223.6
9.90
8.24
6.0
259.2
6.22
5.67
17:12
323.5
225.3
10.04
8.08
6.4
290.0
6.14
5.98
17:13
321.6
225.3
9.85
8.26
6.2
274.8
6.14
5.93
17:14
326.2
221.5
10.03
B.12
5.7
272.9
6.20
6.06
17:15
321.0
223.5
10.16
7.94
6.2
281.5
6.09
6.55
AVERA6E VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 HINUTES
17:15
327.1
223.4
9.89
8.23
6.3
284.1
6.20
5.53
17:16
310.5
220.4
10.36
7.BO
6.2
293.6
5.99
6.89
17:17
302.9
220.2
10.53
7.65
6.6
319.4
5.84
7.33
17:16
295.7
216.7
10.59
7.63
6.6
322.1
5.31
7.37
E-124
-------
Site ? Sewage Sludge Incineraar 06-06-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 4
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILEF-
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
HEARTH
TIKE
doiSC2
DOiNGx
1 02
K C02
dmTHC
DC! CO
X C02
I 02
17:19
292.4
215.4
10.72
7.46
6.7
360.9
5.69
7.41
17:20
238.6
213.7
10.65
7.49
6.6
341.3
5.68
7.50
17:21
290.9
213.0
10.79
7.43
6.8
359.9
5.65
7.67
17:22
286.3
214.3
10.B&
7.33
7.1
367.5
5.57
7.30
17:23
284.6
211.1
10.77
7.44
7.0
3M.fi
5.59
7.66
17:24
-"283.6
211.6
10.84
7.37
7.2
302.0
5.58
7.40
17:25
286.5
210.0
10.68
7.53
6.B
354.1
5.68
7.24
17:2c
287.8
210.4
10.82
7.37
7.1
390.1
5.66
7.12
17:27
288.5
210.4
10.66
7.49
7.3
382.1
5.67
7.06
17:26
293.5
212.0
10.60
7.60
6.9
377.2
5.74
6.85
17:29
295.1
214.0
10.53
7.65
7.0
377.6
5.90
6.83
17:30
300.0
213.5
10.45
7.77
6.9
356.9
5.B1
6.68
AVERASE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 HIKUTtS
17:30 292.4 213.B 10.66 7.53 6.8 356.0 5.72 7.25
AVERA6E VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 60 MINUTES OF VALID DATA
17:30 294.3 214.0 10.61 7.57 7.2 355.9 5.74 4.64
17:31
298.8
214.7
10.58
7.58
7.2
374.4
5.84
6.66
17:32
292.6
212.0
10.62
7.59
7.2
366.4
5.77
6.66
17:33
295.8
214.5
10.4$
7.71
7.1
386.9
5.79
6.63
17:34
302.2
213,6
10.4C
7.76
7.1
361.5
5.B8
6.49
17:35
306.6
213.5
10.33
7.85
6.5
356.6
5.88
6.35
17:36
308.6
217.4
10.33
7.86
6.7
349.9
5.99
6.17
17:37
307.7
216.4
10.38
7.83
6.7
337.2
5.94
6.17
17:36
309.4
219.6
10.29
7.88
6.9
357.8
5.97
6.34
17:39
309.3
214.9
10.26
7.91
6.3
335.9
5.98
6.25
17:40
310.1
218.0
10.34
7.86
6.B
352.6
5.98
6.25
17:41
310.0
219.3
10.22
7.94
6.8
339.3
5.97
6.03
17:42
312.5
216.7
10.29
7.91
6.6
341.8
5,-97
6.14
17:43
313.6
219.5
10.21
7.96
7.1
358.9
5.95
6.09
17:44
313.4
218.7
10.11
8.10
6.4
31B.9
6.04
6.12
17:45
317.4
218.6
10.25
7.91
6.5
347.1
6.03
6.14
AVERASE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
17:45 307.5 216.5 10.34 7.B4 6.8 352.3 5.93 6.30
17:46
313.4
216.0
10.22
7.95
6.7
330.0
6.01
6.18
17:47
314.6
216.0
10.22
7.98
6.B
353.5
5.96
6.50
17:48
316.0
218.7
10.26
7.91
6.9
349.4
5.99
6.62
17:49
313.6
214.1
10.28
7.93
6.6
346.0
5.93
6.85
17:50
313.4
215.9
10.24
7.93
7.0
367.6
5.86
6.80
E-125
-------
CAl-IBRATION SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor
REASON: Direct cal check at end of testing for the day
DATE : 06-06-1990 TINE: 17:50 - 18:17
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
MONITOR
RESPONSE
BOILER
EOILER
BOILER
BOILER
pp/nS02
ppmS02
ppmN0\'
ppmNOx
0.0
218.0
0.0
240.0
2.0
1.7
239.1
BOILER
BOILER
7. 02
7. 02
0.00
12. 50
u . 06
12.36
10
10
BOILER
BOILER
C02
'/. C02
0.00
11 .01
—0.01
10.99
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
ppm CO
ppm CO
7. C02
7. C02
0.0
181-2
0.0
457-5
0 .00
11.01
0. 5
177.4
9.1
464 . O
-0 . 07
io. as
HEARTH
HEARTH
7. 02
7. 02
o. 00
12. 50
0. 05
12.36
E-126
-------
OP*L_i r IGN SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor
REASON: Initial direct cal - 6/7/90
DATE : 06-07--.1990 TIME: 06:36 - 07:22
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
HUN1TOR
RESPONSE
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ppmSO?
ppmS02
ppmS02
0.0
:is.o
'•61.4
1 .3
219.2
361 .3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ppfi-.NO:;
ppmNO::
ppmNOx
0. 0
240.0
475.0
0 .4
241.4
479.2
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
*/. 02
7. 02
7. 02
0.00
12.50
20.60
0.05
12.50
20. 67
10
10
10
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
*/. CC2
•/. C02
'/. COT?
0.00
11.01
17.46
<.». oo
11 . 00
17.73
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
ppm CO
ppm CO
ppm CO
U. O
181.2
282.0
0.0
457. 5
1263.0
0.4
iai .9
284.0
457.5
1289.3
STACK
STACK
STACK
7. C02
7. C02
7. C02
o. oO
11.01
17.46
0.03
10.97
17.57
HEARTH
HEARTH
HEARTH
7. 02
7. 02
7. 02
0.00
12. 50
20.60
0.09
12.50
20.61
E-127
\
-------
Site 9 Se
-------
Site 9 Sewage Slcdoe Ircineraor
06-07-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CHAN10
CHhN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 4
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
HEARTH
TIME
O3sS02
DQlNOx
I 02
Z C02
ooiTHC
DOM CO
1 C02
X 02
AVERAGE
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
08:30
262.2
179.1
11.39
7.C5
9.3
503.7
5.13
10.5?
08:3! :¦
271.0
13C.4
11.58
6.81
15.9
831.2
4.89
11.75
08:32
276.5
129.6
11.34
6.95
15.9
918.4
4.92
11.B3
08:33
289.6
135.3
10.79
7.50
14.6
872.4
5.25
12.00
08:34
296.7
133.8
10.88
7.34
13.9
848.7
5.33
12.03
08:35
301.3
134.9
10.46
7.82
13.5
824.7
5.48
11.83
08:3o
313.9
138.4
10.13
8.06
12.5
754.9
5.58
11.57
08:3/
341.0
149.8
9.10
9.10
10.7
638.1
6.04
11.21
08:36
391.3
160.4
8.33
9.63
9.2
553.5
6.45
1C.61
08:39
441.7
164.1
7.19
10.69
8.1
470.1
6.96
9.83
08:40
529.0
167.6
5.81
11.78
7.5
508.3
7.51
9.30
08:41
637.3
160.3
4.59
12.89
10.5
391.6
6.37
8.69
08:42
690.3
1G2.8
5.31
12.09
13.7
1028.9
8.72
7.69
08:43
567.2
220.5
7.31
10.54
10.5
426.6
8.11
6.12
08:44
425.8
240.B
9.11
9.12
7.B
286.6
6.97
5.32
08:45
356.8
231.9
9.79
6.63
6.6
319.2
6.43
6.10
AVERAGE
VALUES
F3R THE LAST
15 WHITES
08:45
408,7
165.3
8.79
9.26
11.4
681.5
6.47
9.72
08:46
329.9
227.3
10.06
8.41
6.4
329.3
6.03
7.37
08:47
327.4
227.9
9.69
8.74
6.1
314.3
6.11
8.17
08:48
332.8
226.8
9.53
8.75
5.6
286.8
6.31
8.00
08:49
327.4
226.9
9.76
B.59
5.5
285.9
6.25
7.41
03; 50
315.7
225.3
9.96
8.42
5.4
287.9
6.1o
7.52
08:51
>07.4
223.3
10.24
8.20
5.4
295.2
6.03
7.73
03:52
291.5
219.1
10.57
7.91
5.6
304.1
5.67
6.16
C8:53
276.9
213.9
10.84
7.66
5.9
329.3
6.47
8.37
08:54
266.6
209.7
11.03
7.49
5.9
334.7
5.61
3.60
08:55
254.4
203.9
11.16
7.31
6.2
355.4
5.40
B.62
08:5c
251.5
206.0
10.98
7.46
6.4
346.0
5.52
B.46
08:57
244.5
2C2.8
11.12
7.23
6.4
352.9
5.45
3.45
08:58
234.9
199.2
11.41
7.01
6.8
375.6
5.34
8.83
08:59
226.1
197.3
11.48
6.90
6.9
384.7
5.17
9.14
09:00
223.1
193.9
11.63
6.77
7.3
359.1
5.12
9.36
AVERAGE VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
09:00
280.7
213.6
10.63
7.79
6.1
332.1
5.74
8.28
AVERA6E VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 60 MINUTES Of VALID DATA
09:00
310.6
193.6
10.33
7.99
8.3
463.9
5.74
9.51
09:01
220.0
191.3
11.68
6.72
7.3
419.6
4.99
9.60
09:02
221.0
190.0
11.74
6.68
7.7
429.1
4.99
9.85
C9:03
221.6
186.8
11.74
6.67
7.7
440.0
4.93
10.12
C9: 0*
225.6
167.6
11.66
6.73
8.1
454.0
4.94
10.23
C?:05
230.1
186.7
11.56
6.79
8.3
478.4
4.96
10,28
C-?:0&
236.4
191.0
11.42
6.92
8.0
456.6
5.04
10.24
09:07
241.9
190.2
11.30
7.CO
7.6
452.0
5.12
10.25
09:06
249.5
197.1
11.12
7.21
7.4
420,3
5.23
9.97
09:C9
255.9
199.6
10.95
7.32
7.2
405.6
5.27
9.77
E-129
-------
Site 9 Se«3ce Sludoe Incmeraor
06-07-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 4
CHhN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
HEARTH
TIME
0paS32
odbNDx
I 02
I C02
ddiTHC
DDI CO
I C02
2 C2
09:10
257.8
200.4
11.03
7.28
7.:
375.8
5.36
9.61
09:1!
255.5
199.1
11.31
7.09
6.7
383.7
5.24
?.E6
09:12
253.2
200.5
11.43
7.03
6.9
379.2
5.15
10.08
09:13
251.2
196.3
11.42
7.01
6.7
389.7
5.12
10.19
09:14
=249.3
196.6
11.55
6.90
6.7
379.6
5.08
10.33
09:15
"244.9
192.0
11.59
6.86
6.5
397.5
5.06
10.36
AVERAGE VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
09:15
240.9
193.8
11.43
6.95
7.3
417.5
5.10
10.05
09:16
236.3
185.7
11.89
6.61
6.8
40!.e
4.95
10.48
09:17
229.0
174.9
12.14
6.42
7.2
449.1
4.80
10.84
09:18
218.0
163.8
12.44
6.18
7.9
477.9
4.62
11.20
09:19
213.8
162.4
12.15
6.42
8.5
519.0
4.51
11.56
09:20
223.4
160.7
11.98
6.51
8.1
518.4
4.62
11.62
09:2!
231.4
165.3
11.58
6.88
8.3
513.5
4.83
11.54
09:22
243.8
161,7
11.49
6.90
7.9
514.1
4.92
11.43
09:23
251.0
162.6
11.24
7.20
8.4
511.1
5.12
11.12
09:24
255.4
157.1
11.06
7.22
8.7
536.7
5.08
10.70
09:25
267.2
164.6
10.55
7.77
6.5
517.7
5.40
10.29
09:26
205.4
169.3
9.95
8.14
8.3
509.3
5.60
9.81
09:27
300.0
176.3
9.84
B.38
7,9
475.0
5.07
9.27
09:26
312.2
103.9
9.21
6.84
7.6
465.2
6.05
8.95
09:29
330.3
190.9
9.14
8.95
7.4
442.4
6.22
8.43
09:30
342.5
200.0
8.47
9.47
7.1
416.7
6.44
7.95
AVERAGE
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
09:30
262.6
172.0
10.87
7.46
7.9
464.5
5.27
10.35
09:31
360.6
213.1
8.40
9.54
6.6
379.2
6.b2
7.31
09:32
366.9
217.1
7.91
9.93
6.1
357.1
6.03
7.23
09:33
369.0
222.7
8.22
9.61
6.1
334.5
6.B1
6.7?
09:34
366.1
225.3
0.02
9.86
5.8
327.5
6.84
6.66
09:35
373.1
234.4
7.90
9.91
5.7
302.9
6.82
6.42
09:36
382.4
237.0
7.65
10.15
5.4
284.5
7.06
6.16
09:37
379.1
236.7
8.19
9.68
5.2
272.2
6.97
5.87
09:36
363.4
234.8
8.44
9.59
5.6
263.3
6.87
6.23
09:39
360.1
237.7
8.65
9.44
5.2
266.3
6.76
6.40
09:40
347.2
239.6
8.84
9.34
5.2
263.4
6.69
6.63
09:41
338.3
237.4
8.96
9.15
4.9
253.7
6.50
6.70
09:42
316. B
241.6
9.31
8.88
5.3
255.7
6.41
6.91
09:43
296.4
241.1
9.55
8.68
5.1
269.9
6.22
7.44
09:44
289.1
243.3
9.75
0.53
5.4
271.4
6.18
7.69
09:45
279.9
240.9
9.77
8.50
5.2
275.1
6.06
8.23
AVERA6E VALUES FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
09:45
345.9
233.5
8.64
9.39
5.5
293.1
6.64
6.87
09:46
277.0
240.6
9.88
8.41
5.4
273.0
6.08
8.22
09:47
267.5
239.1
10.06
8.22
5.3
2B8.5
5.94
6.51
09:48
258.3
236.8
10.36
7.97
5.4
292.0
5.82
8.79
09:45
250.9
235.4
10.36
7.96
5.5
305.6
5.72
9.10
09:50
247.7
234.7
10.49
7.84
5.7
305,2
5.71
9.19
09:51
247.2
235.8
10.34
7.96
5.6
315.0
5.69
9.28
09:52
247.9
232.5
10.51
7.78
5.5
305.1
5.67
9.40
E-130
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor 06-07-1990
CHAN 6
CHAM 7
CHAN e
CHAN10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 4
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
HEARTH
TIME
£>oiS02
PotNOx
Z 02
I C02
cdiTHC
DD« CO
X C02
I 02
09:53
241.5
230.8
10.67
7.64
5.8
328.1
5.58
9.67
09:54
236.7
227.4
10.75
7.55
5.8
326.7
5.48
9.85
09:55
236.7
227.2
10.43
7.66
5.9
332.1
5.47
9.85
09:56
236.1
221.5
10.81
7.44
5.8
336.0
5.41
9.96
09:57
£3.9
221.4
10.82
7.45
6.0
353.1
5.36
10.18
09:J8
232.3
215.6
10.82
7.37
5.9
355.2
5.32
10.36
09:59
234.4
217.5
10.82
7.48
6.3
360.4
5.38
10.32
10:00
236.9
212.6
10.73
7.47
6.2
363.2
5.30
10.26
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
10:00 245.7 228.6 10.54 7.75 5.7 322.6 5.59 9.53
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 60 MINUTES OF VALID DATA
10:00
273.8
207.0
10.37
7.89
6.6
379.4
3.65
9.20
10:01
242.2
217.2
10.60
7.66
6.3
365.9
5.48
10.10
10:02
241.1
207.0
10.71
7.47
6.3
379.3
5.38
10.15
10:05
233.3
202.8
11.05
7.27
6.9
404.6
5.34
10.26
10:04
232.4
202.9
10.72
7.53
6.8
427.8
5.27
10.32
10:05
244.1
206.4
10.59
7.67
6.8
407.0
5.51
10.20
10:06
253.7
210.1
10.12
8.08
6.5
398.7
5.65
9.98
10:07
262.6
211.6
10.10
8.08
6.4
386.5
5.78
9.61
10:05
270.0
214.5
9.74
8.43
6.6
389.1
5.95
9.24
10:09
275.S
213.9
9.83
B.28
6.6
383.5
5.96
9.01
10:10
281.0
218.3
9.44
8.71
6.9
393.9
6.13
9.01
10:11
292.5
217.7
9.34
8.72
6.8
369.6
6.15
8.84
10:12
302.4
220.7
9.02
9.06
6.8
362.7
6.39
8.60
10:13
309.9
221.8
7.04
8.95
6.3
338.1
6.31
8.50
10:14
310.1
227.1
8.85
9.23
6.3
329.4
6.49
8.48
10:15
31?.8
232.3
3.57
9.35
5.9
300.2
6.49
8.35
AVERAGE
VALUES FOR
THE LAST
15 MINUTES
10:15
271.4
215.0
9.85
8.30
6.5
375.7
5.88
9.38
10:16
332.7
238.8
8.16
9.80
5.6
277.8
6.78
7.96
10:17
352.0
243.7
7.87
9.91
5.3
249.9
6.B5
7.50
10:18
367.5
244.3
7.84
10.01
5.1
239.9
7.02
7.04
10:19
366.7
245.5
8.09
9.77
5.1
228.4
6.91
6.64
10:20
349.0
246.1
8.66
9.33
5.0
230.6
6.72
6.84
10:21
320.1
245.1
9.29
8.82
5.0
239.7
6.37
7.51
10:22
293.9
244.9
9.65
8.53
5.2
254.2
6.11
6.29
10:23
2B0.3
241.6
9.75
8.46
5.1
259.3
6.02
8.78
10:24
276.0
243.3
9.85
8.35
5.3
259.2
6.01
8.93
10:25
272.2
243.9
9.79
8.44
5.1
258.6
6.01
8.90
10:26
272.0
241.7
9.87
8.31
5.2
255.2
5.99
8.86
10:27
266.2
238.9
10.04
8,19
5.3
265.5
5.95
8.79
10:25
253 .9
233.3
10.43
7.83
5.4
280.8
5.77
8.79
10:29
238.2
228.9
10,81
7.47
5.8
318.6
5.52
8.98
10:30
227.3
229.4
10.85
7.47
5.8
323.1
5.38
9.42
AVERAGE
VALUES FOR
THE LAST
15 MINUTES
10:30
297.9
240.7
9.40
8.71
5.3
262.7
6.23
8.23
10:31
227.5
231.2
10.70
7.58
5.9
331.3
5.44
9.63
-------
Siti 9 S«Baje SLdce Incin«raor
06-07-1990
cm 6
CHAM 7
CHAN 0
CHAN10
CHAfc :
CHAN 2
CHAN 4
ChftN 3
HUE
boiler
BOILER
BOILER
30ILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
HEARTH
:mS02
octNO*
I 02
I C02
03lTHC
dos £3
I C32
I 02
10:32
231.0
234.6
10,58
7.69
5.7
315.5
5.50
9.66
15:33
234.7
232.5
10.51
7.74
5.9
320.3
5.57
9.58
10:34
236.7
231.3
10.52
7.68
5.7
314.3
5.54
9.53
10:35
236.1
233.7
10.52
7.73
5.8
322.6
5.54
9.77
10:3a
¦236.5
232.6
10.46
7.73
5.7
319.5
5.51
9,83
13:37
"24C.5
234.6
iC.47
7.76
5.9
324.6
5.56
9.6?
10:35
240.9
231.1
10.47
7.72
5.6
329.9
5.49
9.59
10:35
241.3
233.7
1C.52
7.74
6.0
331.9
5.56
9.95
10:40
243.2
229.6
iC.43
7.76
5.7
335.1
5.52
9.97
10:4!
2*5.7
233.3
10.43
7.32
0.1
336.4
5.59
9.94
10:42
249.3
232.6
10.23
7.96
5.8
334.7
5.64
9.SI
10:43
253.3
236.5
10.21
7.99
5.8
322.5
5.74
9.60
10:44
258.0
235.5
9.97
8.19
5.5
316.6
5.81
9.29
10:45
263.0
238.0
10.01
8.15
5.6
300.6
5.89
3.98
AVERAGE
VALUES
THE '.AS7
15 1INUTE5
10:45
242.0
233.4
10.40
7.B2
5.8
323.3
5.59
9.69
10:46
262.7
202.8
9.87
8.32
5.7
316.3
5.94
0.99
10:47
267.6
197.3
9.82
8.33
5.8
293.5
5.93
8.99
10:43
270.2
198.6
9.72
. 8.42
5.7
300.4
6.00
8.94
10:49
271.4
200.8
9.75
8.41
5.5
286.0
5.97
8.76
10:50
278.3
205.6
9.55
8.57
5.4
287.4
6.10
8.64
10:51
275.9
238.6
9.78
8.36
5.5
282.4
6.02
0.39
10:52
268.2
243.0
9.83
8.35
5.6
290.5
5.97
8.44
10:53
264.2
240.4
9.88
8.27
5.5
293.0
5.90
8.66
10:54
267.7
246.0
9.59
8.57
5.6
290.6
5.99
8.63
10:55
274.4
242.0
9.56
8.55
5.4
270.5
6.05
8.48
10:56
275 .1
209.2
9.65
8.52
5.5
279.9
6.07
8.34
10:57
272.6
203.4
9.71
8.44
5.2
279.7
5.93
8.56
10:55
26G.5
205.7
9.95
8.25
5.6
281.7
5.98
8.55
10:59
259 .3
199.0
10.17
0.05
5.5
298.8
5.83
8.04
11:00
252.4
198.8
10.28
7.98
5.5
300.:
5.77
9.19
AVERA6E
VALUES rQR THE LAST"
15 MINUTES
11:00
268.6
215.5
9.81
8.36
5.5
290.6
5.97
8.69
AVERA6E VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 60 flI MUTES Cf VALID DATA
11:00 270.1 226.1 9.86 8.30 5.0 313.2 5.92
.1:01
251.5
240.2
10.11
8.12
5.4
304.1
5.76
11:02
253.5
243.6
10.13
8.09
5.5
288.8
5.83
11:03
252.5
241.4
10.16
8.07
5.7
307.7
5.30
11:04
248.0
242.5
'10.22
8.01
5.8
306.5
5.75
11:05
251.1
240.0
10.17
8.05
5.7
318.7
5.78
11:06
248.5
199.2
10.38
7.86
5.7
311.6
5.71
11:07
246.6
196.8
10.18
8.06
5.7
324.2
5.71
11:08
249.8
194.3
10.29
7.93
5.8
308.0
5.75
11:09
248.9
194.1
10.21
8.01
5.8
332.0
5.72
11:10
251.7
196.5
10.13
8.04
5.5
314.3
5.72
11:11
257.7
240.1
9.94
8.27
5.7
314.8
5.87
11:12
261.4
242.6
' 9.97
8.16
5.7
301.0
5.07
11:13
259.4
244.8
10.02
8.19
5.6
307.0
5.90
11:14
25o.6
242.2
9.95
8.20
5.5
307.3
5.83
E-132
-------
Sitt 9 Sewage Slad$i Incmeracr
06-07-im
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 3
ChANlD
zm 1
CKAh 2
CHAN 4
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STAC<
STACK
hearth
TIKE
odiS02
cdiNOx
: 02
: :o2
OOlTHC
HI CO
: CG2
X 02
11:15
258.5
242.8
9.98
3.24
5.6
303.1
5.92
9.31
AVERAGE
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
11:15
253.1
225.8
10.12
3.09
5.7
310.3
5.79
9.34
11:1b
26C.3
201.5
9.87
8.28
5.3
306.3
5.3b
9.25
11:17
252.2
202.8
9,91
8.30
5.5
295.1
5.96
9.26
11:15
25c. 3
202.5
9.74
8.40
5.3
303.4
5.55
9.13
11 :i5
255.9
235.2
5.96
8.31
5.6
291.5
5.99
9.05
11:20
269.5
207.5
9. 5t
8.5S
( c
295.2
e.31
3.93
11:21
27c.3
244.4
9.e0
8.52
5.5
276.4
C.li
8.76
11:22
278.2
247.4
9.53
8.59
5.3
298.6
6.::1
8.51
11:23
275.2
245.B
9.77
8.37
5.4
230.1
c.05
0.5?
11:24
269.3
243.3
9.73
8.39
5.o
303.5
5.99
8.7;
11:25
265.3
744. J
9.99
8.2C
5.7
290.9
5.91
8.36
11:26
260.9
222.(
9.83
8.35
5.7
303.8
5.90
9.10
11:2?
264.9
207.*
9.72
8.42
5.6
232.3
5.96
9.05
¦1:26
272.2
210.3
9.58
8.56
5.6
279.7
6.08
3.92
B.68
11:29
274.2
209.9
9.69
fl.42
5.3
258.9
6.03
11:30
273.7
209.8
9.72
8.44
5.6
278.0
6.04
8.68
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
11:30 258.9 220.3 9.74
5.5
299.3
o.OO
,91
11:31
269.4
245.9
9.77
B.32
5.4
271.5
'<3
CO
3.64
11:32
254.5
245.8
10.12
8.08
5.5
2S5.1
5.95
8.62
11:33
257.0
245.2
10.16
8.02
5.3
253.8
5.77
8.S3
11:34
253.4
244.1
10.29
7.93
5.7
293.0
5.80
9.05
11:35
245.0
239.1
10.47
7.74
5.6
312.7
5.68
9.09
11:36
240.2
10.56
7.68
6.9
319.6
5.60
9.31
11:37
238. C
192.4
JO.55
7.69
7.5
330.4
5.57
9.43
11:36
236.9
192.5
10.66
7.58
7 1
329.5
5.57
9.4?
11:39
235.3
190.7
10.61
7.62
7.5
338.6
5.54
9.63
11:40
235.2
193.7
10.54
7.6?
7.0
330.0
5.54
9.79
11:41
237.4
235.3
10.44
7.77
t>.6
337.9
5.60
9.76
11:42
238.7
238.4
10.57
7.64
6.4
331.0
5.53
9.73
11:43
238.4
237.2
'10.49
7.74
6.4
345,7
5.56
9.80
11:44
241.8
240.1
10.37
7.32
6.3
343.3
5.60
9.34
11:45
247.3
241.5
10.H
8.03
6.0
331.5
5.74
9.72
AVERAGE
VALUES for
THE LAST
15 MINUTES
11:45
245.4
225.7
10.38
7.82
6.4
319.6
5.67
9.38
11:4c
247.C
238.4
10.38
7.79
o.i
332.0
5.69
9.52
11:47
247.5
238.9
10.17
8.02
c.O
336.4
5.71
9.76
E-133
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor 06-07-1590
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CHA.N10
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 4
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
EOILEft
STACK
STACK
STACK
HEARTH
TIME
ddiSC2
oc«NOx
I 02
I C02
Dca'HC
ODi CO
I C02
I 02
11:49
255.0
237.0
9.87
8.34
6.4
354.7
5.B8
9.72
11:50
259.7
240.2
9.93
8.16
5.6
321.1
5.31
9.65
11:51
264,4
244.7
9.BE
8.30
5.8
313.?
5.92
°.48
11:52
267.7
243.0
9.7S
8.31
5.0
317.5
5.68
9.38
11:53
¦259.7
247.2
9.84
0.36
5.8
310.3
5.98
9.26
11:54
'270.4
245.fi
9.69
8.44
5.4
305.5
5.96
9.10
11:55
270.0
244.9
9.96
8.23
5.5
299.3
6.00
9.01
11:56
263.0
242.0
10.00
0.19
5.5
318.5
5.85
9.13
11:57
261.1
244.2
10.OB
8.10
5.6
311,7
5.86
9.35
11:58
260.3
241.6
10.05
8.14
5.5
329.8
5.83
9.48
11:5?
258.1
243.5
10.17
8.03
6.0
325.5
5.78
9.62
12:C0
253.1
23?.?
10.03
0.16
5.5
337.8
5.81
?.61
AVERAGE
VAUJES FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
12:00
260.4
242.1
10.00
8.1?
5.9
322.9
5.35
9.46
AVERAGE VALUES FDR THE LAST HOUR: 60 HIH1JTES OF VALID DATA
12:00
257.0
220.7
10.06
8.12
5.8
310.6
5.63
9.27
12:01
257.4
242.8
10.19
8.03
5.7
330.1
5.83
9.56
12:02
257.6
243.0
9.96
8.23
5.7
332.8
5.84
9.44
12:03
261.0
243.7
10.01
8.16
5.7
315.1
5.87
9.36
12:04
262.8
244.0
9.82
8.36
5.5
321.1
5.95
9.37
E-134
-------
Site 9 Se*ace Sludce Incineraor 06-07-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CRANIO
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 4
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
HEARTH
¦IKE
ooaS02
oobNOx
I 02
I C02
OOiTHC
pot CO
I C02
X G2
12:09
267.4
247.7
9.77
B.33
5.3
289.3
5.95
9.14
:2:i:
266.3
247.4
9.85
8.32
5.6
292.4
6.00
9.07
12:11
266.4
246.6
9.77
8.34
5.4
289.7
5.93
9.11
12:12
265.9
246.1
9.94
8.25
5.5
293.2
5.96
17.63
12:13
261.3
246.5
9.93
B.24
5.4
299.5
5.87
20.42
12:14
: 259.8
247.5
10.09
8.12
5.6
295.2
5.89
20.43
12:15
25-4.7
244.0
10.13
8.05
5.4
311.3
5.76
20.46
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
12:15 263.4 245.7 9.93 B.24
5.5
307.1
5.90
12.10
12:16
252.5
244.5
10.30
7.92
5.8
309.1
5.74
17.01
12:17
250.9
241.2
10.22
7.97
5.7
313.8
5.71
9.90
12:16
246.8
241.8
10.36
7.83
5.7
315.9
5.70
9.96
12:19
242.3
239.4
10.35
7.88
5.B
348.5
5.62
9.99
12:20
244.0
240.7
10.38
7.82
5.8
326.8
5.67
10.10
12:21
244.5
238.6
10.32
7.88
5.8
343.7
5.65
10.13
12:22
245.0
241.7
10.29
7.90
5.8
329.6
5.66
10.22
12:23
248.4
241.7
10.17
8.01
5.6
334.2
5.74
10.21
12:24
246.0
239.1
10.44
7.71
5.6
322.7
5.64
¦0.27
12:25
241.8
238.2
10.43
7.78
6.0
351.1
5.58
10.26
12:26
242.3
241.2
10.37
7.78
5.B
337.6
5.57
10.19
12:27
245.8
245.0
10.14
8.04
5.6
325.6
5.71
9.97
12:26
250.6
244.5
10.12
7.96
5.5
312.2
5.72
9.91
12:29
249.5
243.9
10.26
7.91
5.7
312.7
5.75
9.81
12:30
244.9
240.9
10.30
7.83
5.7
327.8
5.62
9.90
AVERAGE VALUES FCR THE LAST 15 fflNUTES
12:30 246*3 241.5 10.30 7.68
5.7
327.4
5.67
10.52
12:31
243.8
241.0
10.37
7.84
5.9
326.2
5.68
9.96
12:32
243.4
241.C
10.27
7.86
5.4
327.9
5.60
9.93
12:33
244.3
242.4
10.40
7.81
5.3
325.7
5.66
10.OG
COMMENTS: End of Satphr.a after Ren 12?
E-135
o
-------
C AL_ I BRAT X ON SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor
REASON: Second direct cal check — NO ADJUSTMENTS MADE
DATE s 06-07-1990 TIME: 12:34 - 13:10
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
MONITOR
RESPONSE
6
6
7
7
8
S
10
10
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
opmSG2
pp(nS02
ppmNO:-;
ppmNOx
•/. 02
'/. 02
7. C02
V, CD2
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
ppm CO
ppm CO
7. C02
7. C02
0.0
218.0
0.0
240.0
0.00
12. 50
0.00
11.01
0.0
181.2
0.0
457.5
0.00
11.01
3.1
190.5
1 . 5
235.9
0.06
12. 15
0.02
11 .08
0.9
178 .6
10.0
463.6
0.01
10 . 39
HEARTH
HEARTH
7. 02
¦/. 02
•(_). uu
12.50
0 .05
12.22
E-136
-------
C^L_ I EtF*^T IE ON SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraar
REASON: Third direct cal of selected analyzers
DATE : Cfe-07-1990 TIME: 13:24 - 13:32
MONITOR GAS MONITOR
A/D CHAN DESCRI PT ION UNITS VALUE f^.£PJ±5E
6 BOILER ppmS02 0-0 2.4
6 BOILER ppmS02 218.0 22U. 2
8 BOILER "/. 02 0.00 0.07
8 BOILER 7. 02 12. 50 12 - 50
3 HEARTH 7. 02 0.00 0.06
3 HEARTH 7. 02 12.50 12.50
E-137
-------
Site 9 S«Njgi Sludce Inciner
-------
Sits 9 Seuge Sludge Inciniraor 06-07-1990
CHAN 6 CHAN 7 CHAN 8 CHAW CHAM 1 CHAN 2 CHAN 4 CHAN 3
BORE* 8QILER 8C1LER BOILER STACK STACK STACK H:ARTH
IM PPiSQ? DQiHOx I 02 z C32 n^TrtC sc. C3 I C32 I o;
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST HCJRj 60 MINUTES C? VALID DATA
l5;M J-5-c 132.3 10.33 7.90 5.9 315.5
15; C1
28b.9
98.4
10,67
7.88
'.6
445.0
5.59
10.25
15:02
292.4
69.2
10.54
7.89
7.3
429.3
5.53
10.1C
15:03
302.4
¦71.5
10.36
8.15
7.4
402.;
5.81
10.05
15:04
306.1
76.6
10.32
9.07
7.0
383.9
5.77
9.78
15:05
303.fi
73.6
10.51
7.99
7.1
384.7
5.SO
9.61
15:06
299.6
156.4
10.35
8.05
6.8
386.2
5.69
9.65
15:07
30c. 1
163.8
10.29
8.21
c.9
374.1
5.84
9.73
15:05
312.6
166.4
9.40
8.77
6.5
361.4
5.97
9.43
15:09
323.9
163.7
9.02
9.04
6.5
323.7
6.40
8.41
15:10
329.9
166.6
8.88
9.09
e.3
313.8
6.42
7.71
15:11
328.3
165.3
9.18
8.02
6.3
300.1
c.39
7.63
15:12
321.7
164.5
9.08
8.96
6.3
310.0
6.36
7.64
15:13
31G.5
166.1
8.37
9.02
6.:
296.8
6.26
7.78
15:14
322.1
164.6
8.56
9.27
o.O
278.5
6.54
7.7C
15.-1:
325.5
164.3
8.50
9.30
5.7
273.9
6.50
7.52
av-:ra6e
VCLUcS
POR THE LAST
15 OUTES.
• K. ' C
312.0
135.4
9.63
8.57
o.6
351.1
6.06
8.87
15:1c
322.2
95.9
8.76
9.OS
5.8
265.6
6.46
>.55
15:17
317.2
93.6
8.77
9.10
5.8
275.7
6,39
7.75
15:18
316.4
94.7
8.83
9.02
5.8
260.3
6.39
7.8i
15:15
313.7
96.5
8.83
9.05
5.8
254.8
6.37
7.95
15:20
312.5
97-1
8.90
9.00
5.6
258.7
6.31
7.92
15:21
336.7
161.5
9.20
8.75
5.4
256.9
6.25
8.06
15:22
296.7
165.2
9.22
8.72
5.5
270.9
6.16
8.21
15:23
294.2
167.0
9.26
8.69
5.7
261.6
6.11
8.39
15:24
295.6
169.3
9.54
8.56
5.7
262.0
6.08
£.38
15:25
297.6
173.2
9.55
8.54
5.4
257.6
6.05
£.23
15:26
295.4
101.7
9.76
8.40
5.5
259.7
6.00
6.31
15:27
266.4
96.3
9.85
8.30
5.5
269.4
5.88
8.56
15:23
294.9
96.2
9.85
9.30
5.9
275.7
5.90
8.69
15:2?
280.3
95.1
9.99
8.15
5.5
285.3
5.82
8.79
15:30
277.3
92.a
10.07
8.11
5.7
289.4
5.77
9.02
average
VALUES
rCR THE LAST
15 NfMUTES
15:30
299.8
119.8
9.36
8.65
5.6
266.9
6.13
3.24
15:31
275.0
171.2
10.15
7.99
5.8
304.8
5.69
9.31
15:32
27C.5
169.7
10.22
7.97
6.0
305.8
5.69
9.52
15:33
266.9
170.4
10.21
7.92
5.8
323.5
5.62
9.68
15:34
270.1
168.0
10.21
8.01
6.1
316.5
5.67
9.87
15:35
277.3
169.1
9.96
8.13
6.0
331.1
5.65
9.91
15:36
282.7
167.3
10.04
8.14
6.1
314.0
5.78
9.84
15:37
285.6
168.7
9.84
8.26
5.9
330.9
5.73
9.87
15:35
291.2
16B.9
9.7®
9.37
6.0
313.5
5.89
9,80
15:39
296.5
170.2
9.50
8.55
6.0
320.1
5.87
9.75
15:40
305.4
169.6
9.48
8.65
6.1
304.0
6.06
9.54
15:41
315.1
171.1
9.20
8.80
5.4
301.2
6.06
9.41
15:42
316.2
170.2
9.39
8.70
5.9
293.4
6.12
9.34
15:43
314.3
172.6
9.33
8.70
5.6
303.7
6.05
9.26
E-139
-------
Site 9
Sewage Slucge incineraor 06-07-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 8
CHANlO
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 4
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
HEARTH
TINE
od«S02
PCfcNOx
X 02
: C02
coaTHC
oca CO
Z CQ2
I 02
15:44
311.9
171.2
9.54
8.56
5.5
293.4
6.09
9.28
15:45
309.9
173.2
9.35
B. 70
5.7
301.2
6.02
9.26
AVERAGE
VALUES FDR
THE LAST
15 MINUTES
15:45
¦¦292.7
170.1
9.75
B.36
5.9
310.5
5.86
9.58
15:46
313.7
174.3
9.36
8.72
5./
284.4
6.11
9.12
15:47
323.0
177.8
8.99
9.01
5.3
275.3
6.22
8.84
15:48
326.8
177.3
9.16
B.76
5.5
261.7
6.26
8.74
15:49
323.3
176.5
9.31
8.79
5.4
271.4
6.IB
8.73
15:50
321.5
176.4
?.<1
8.6c
5.5
267.2
6.15
8.73
15:51
316.7
176.2
9.33
8.77
5.4
272.5
6.13
8.76
15:52
31B.1
176.9
9.33
8.74
5.4
258.4
6.17
8.76
15:53
321.8
176.7
9.17
B.89
5.3
260.9
6.20
8.67
15:5$
323.6
176.5
9.27
8.80
5.3
250.4
6.22
8.50
15:55
325.6
175.1
9.22
B.85
5.1
259.4
6.20
8.53
15:56
323.8
174.8
9.38
8.71
5.4
254.3
6.18
8.51
15:57
318.1
173.5
9.46
B.64
5.2
272.6
6.09
8.56
15:58
310.9
173.6
9.73
8.42
5.4
268.3
6.00
8.71
15:59
305.5
173.7
9.59
B.56
5.5
277.7
5.99
8.90
16:00
307.5
174.1
9.67
8.47
5.1
264.5
5.98
8.94
AVERAGE VALUES FOR
THE LAST
15 MINUTES
16:00
318.7
175.6
9.37
8.72
5.4
266.6
6.14
B.74
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST
HOUR: 60 HINUTES OF VALID DATA
16:00
305.fi
150.2
9.53
8.58
5.9
298.8
6.05
8.65
16:01
306.4
174.0
9.62
8.53
5.3
274.6
5.97
9.10
16:02
306.5
176.9
9.62
8.53
5.3
258.7
5.99
9.17
16:03
310.8
176.0
9.49
8.63
c -
266.3
6.03
9.14
16:04
311.7
176.7
9.61
8.53
5.2
259.4
6.00
9.08
16:05
311.0
176.3
9.63
8.53
5.2
267,5
6.02
9.04
16:06
304.6
175.5
9.£6
8.30
5.3
265.5
5.91
9.07
16:07
300.3
174.7
9.78
8.40
5.2
281.4
5.90
9.30
16:06
300.5
175.8
9.£4
8.32
5.0
270.1
5.88
9.35
16:09
304.4
175.8
9.61
8.54
5.4
276.0
5.96
9.43
16:10
307.7
176.6
9.71
8.43
5.2
267.2
5.94
9.27
16:11
309.1
176.5
9.63
B.53
5.1
263.7
5.99
9.IB
16:12
312.7
177.5
9.58
8.53
5.1
264.7
5.99
9.13
16:15
314.1
176.9
9.49
8.66
5.1
263.5
6.04
9.13
16:14
315.7
177.1
9.61
8.48
4.9
263,6
6.02
9.0?
16:15
310.6
174.0
9.67
8.49
5.1
277.9
5.95
9.20
AVERA6E
VALUES FOR
THE LAST
15 HINUTES
16:15
308.4
176.0
9.65
8.50
5.2
263.7
5.97
9.18
16:16
311.4
174.4
9.63
3.50
5.1
273.1
5.92
9.2?
16:17
318.0
174.3
9.52
8.60
5.1
263.5
6.01
9.28
16:18
313.2
174.8
9.71
8.41
5.2
272.9
5.97
9.25
16:19
309.1
173.5
9.75
8.40
5.2
281.2
5.94
9.38
16:20
310.1
173.0
9.68
8.41
5.2
281,0
5,87
9.53
16:21
312.B
171.3
9.66
8.51
5.3
276,4
5.95
9.46
16:22
314.7
172.7
9.59
8.50
5.1
274.4
5.93
9.50
E-140
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludpe ln:ineracr 06-07-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
:han 8
CHAMO
CHAN 1
CHAN 2
CHAN 4
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
HEARTH
TIHE
coiSQ2
aoiNGx
Z 02
I C02
odiTHC
DDK CO
I C02
X 02
16:23
321.2
171.1
9.49
8.65
5.3
275.0
6.03
9.52
16:24
330.2
171.9
9.34
8.73
275.3
6.06
9.55
16:25
335.0
170.2
9.33
8.73
5.3
272.8
6.11
9.51
16:26
331.0
170.3
9.48
8.62
5.0
274.5
6.03
9.65
16:27.
328.9
163.3
9.5?
8.56
5.2
277.6
6.01
9.77
16:28"'
324.1
169.0
9.65
8.47
5.2
290.5
5.94
9.BO
16:29
322.1
167.3
9.74
8.44
5.2
290.5
5.93
9.94
16:30
318.6
171.3
9.65
8.49
5.2
293.9
5.Be
10.01
AVERAGE
VALUES
FOR THE LAST 15 MINUTES
16:30
320.0
171.6
9.59
B.54
5.2
278.5
5.97
9.56
16:31
319.7
174.3
9.53
B.64
5.4
279.5
5.95
9.B5
16:32
325.2
179.3
9.37
B.73
5.0
266.1
6.05
9.41
16:33
332.6
181.9
9.30
8.81
4.8
247.9
6.15
9.14
16:34
338.0
182.7 .
9.10
B.95
5.1
239.2
6.22
6.92
16:35
340.9
181.7
9.33
8.76
4.9
235.0
6.27
8.66
16:36
333.1
181.6
9.31
8.80
4.6
238.8
6.19
8.51
16:37
332.1
183.5
9.2B
8.83
4.9
231.1
6.25
8.24
16:38
333.5
183.7
9.25
8.84
4.9
233,3
6.25
7.80
16:39
329.9
164.1
9.40
8.72
4.7
226.9
6.22
7.58
16:40
331.0
183.8
9.25
8.85
5.0
229.8
6.25
7.49
16:41
331.7
164.5
9.45
8.68
4.9
230.2
6.21
7.39
16:42
324.1
162.2
9.55
8.61
4.9
240.2
6.15
7.33
16:43
314.5
183.6
9.72
8.45
4.9
242.6
6.04
7.46
16:44
310.7
182.7
9.70
8.49
4.9
245.0
6.04
7.60
16:45
305.4
163.4
9.87
8.32
5.1
247.5
5.97
7.78
AVERAGE
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MNUIES
16:45
326. B
1B2.2
9.43
8.70
4.9
242.2
6.15
3.21
16:4c
302.1
184.1
9.81
8.40
4.8
251.5
5.93
7.97
16:47
303.4
184.1
9.85
8.34
5.0
248.0
5.95
7.99
16:46
301.7
182.6
9.65
8.35
4.9
254.5
5.93
8.11
16:49
303.0
185.1
9.81
8.3B
4.9
241.0
5.93
8.14
16:50
304.9
165.3
9.67
B.51
4.8
245.0
5.96
8.16
16:51
312.7
186.4
9.64
8.52
4.9
235.3
6.04
8.06
16:52
318.5
185.6
9.63
8.53
4.8
241.4
6.02
8.01
16:53
311.6
184.7
9.90
8.29
4.8
241.6
5.95
8.12
16:54
306.7
185.3
9.77
8.41
5.0
252.C
5.91
8.36
16:55
310.4
185.5
9.74
8.42
4.9
237.1
5.97
6.31
16:5c
312.B
184.0
9.66
8.49
4.6
240.8
5.99
8.16
16:57
313.3
182.6
9.84
8.33
4.9
243.5
5.94
8.05
16:58
310.4
181.3
9.72
8.43
4.0
257.2
5.92
8.30
16:59
313.4
182.6
9.79
B.40
4.8
246.8
5.93
8.40
17:00
316.3
183.1
9.62
9.51
4.8
257.9
5.98
8.32
AVERAGE
VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
17:00
309.4
1B4.2
9.75
8.42
4.9
246.2
5.96
8.17
AVE3ASE VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: SO MINUTES OF
VALID DATA
17:00
316.2
176.5
9.61
8.54
5,0
256.9
6.01
8.78
17:01
318.7
1B2.3
9.69
8.47
4.9
245.7
5.96
8.29
E-141
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Indreraor 06-07-1990
CHAN 6
CHAN 7
CHAN 6
CHAN10
CHAN i
CHAN 2
CHAN 4
CHAN 3
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
STACK
STACK
STACK
HEARTH
t:ke
DCS$02
OCiNOx
I 02
I C02
dciTHC
ODf! CO
I C02
I 02
17:02
318.7
132.4
9.66
8.48
5.0
257.4
5.98
6.39
17:03
316.0
182.7
9.81
8.35
4.8
247. £
5.92
6.52
17:04
315.6
181.6
9.66
8.47
4.?
260.E
5.91
6.63
17:05
319.1
133.2
9.63
8.51
5.0
245. E
5.97
6.60
17:0e
s. 327.5
183.7
9.43
8.69
4.8
244.2
6.OS
8.47
17:07
' 329.B
182.6
9.60
8.53
4.3
236.3
6.03
6.50
17:06
327.2
180.4
9.54
8.60
4.7
242.1
6.01
8.66
17:05
329.8
181.3
9.52
8.5?
4.6
230.9
6.01
6.60
17:10
332.6
1B0.2
9.46
8.65
4.7
235.6
6.09
6.60
17:11
335.6
179.7
9.46
8.63
4.6
226.9
6.08
8.50
17:12
334.5
176.9
9.57
8.58
4.8
23B.E
6.04
6.50
17:13
330.6
17B.2
9.66
8.47
4.7
233.6
5.96
6.70
17:14
326.6
177.7
9.72
8.46
4.8
239.6
5.98
8.98
17:15
322.8
176.0
9.75
8.40
4.5
23S.4
5.92
9.01
ftVERASE VAlUES
PER THE LAST
15 MINUTES
17:15
325.7
180.6
9.61
8.53
4.8
241.6
6.00
6.60
17:16
321.5
176.9
9.74
8.44
4.9
243.6
5.93
9.10
17:17
320.0
178.7
9.71
8.44
4.7
238.2
5.91
9.16
17:18
323.9
177.6
9.75
8.45
4.6
241.1
5.91
9.29
17:19
322.3
177.0
9.B1
8.35
4.7
248.5
5.88
9.27
17:20
319.6
176.9
9.87
8.33
4.B
255.1
5.B7
9.37
17:21
315.6
176.0
9.96
8.25
4.B
263.7
5.7?
9.53
17:22
316.2
176.8
9.86
8.32
4.9
264.9
5.82
9.5B
17:23
319.1
178.0
9.90
8.28
4.7
265.0
5.82
9.53
17:24
315.B
178.9
9.B6
8.34
5.0
266.1
5.82
9.64
17:25
319.1
180.5
9.77
8.41
4.9
259.9
5.88
9.57
17:2o
322.3
182.2
9.65
6.53
4.9
249.8
5.95
9.56
17:27
32B.0
132.6
9.57
8.53
4.8
247.6
6.00
9.30
17:26
333.1
134.1
9.41
6.74
4.9
241.0
6.08
9.07
17:29
342.3
184.2
9.33
8.78
4.7
230.1
6.17
E.6?
17:30
343.5
134.1
9.36
8.77
4.6
225.9
6.1B
B.57
AVERA6E VALUES
FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
17:30
324.2
179.6
9.70
6.47
4.8
249.3
5.93
9.28
17:31
341.1
132.B
9.42
8.72
4.7
228.1
6.17
8.51
17:32
338.6
182.5
9.55
8.62
4.7
229.8
6.09
8.63
17:33
339.7
183.9
9.*6
8.69
4.6
229.2
6.11
8.72
17:34
343.9
184.7
9.35
8.78
4.6
222.3
6.15
8.53
17:35
343.3
183.9
9.54
8.64
4.7
225.6
6.13
8.25
I7:3e
336.9
183.6
9.63
8.56
4.7
226.4
6.08
8.26
17:37
335.8
183,1
9.61
8.59
4.7
232.9
6.11
8.31
17:38
334.7
181.9
9.74
8.46
4.7
227.9
6.06
8.40
17:39
330.1
180.7
9.75
8.48
4.B
238.0
6.02
6.44
17:40
328.4
1B0.7
9.79
8.41
4.8
236.9
5.98
8.57
17:41
32B.7
181.2
9.B3
8.39
4.7
243.1
5.9B
8.77
17:42
325.9
179.4
9.92
8.31
4.9
246.C
5.90
8.68
17:43
320.9
178.9
9.97
6.20
5.0
259.;
5.69
9.04
17:44
321.4
178.6
9.95
8.23
5.0
254,1
5.85
9.17
17:45
324.0
179.8
9.64
8.33
4.9
259.0
5.91
9.33
E-142
-------
Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor 06-07-1990
CHAN 6 CHAK 7 CHAN B CHflNIO CHAN 1 CHAN 2 CHAN 4 CHAN 3
20ILER BOILER BOILER BOILER STACK STACK STACK' HEftRTH
11 HE DQiSO? ooiHQx I 02 I CC2 ooaTHC dpi CO X C02 Z 02
fiVERR6E
VALUES FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
17:45
332.9
181.7
9.69
8.51
4.8
237.3
6.03
8.65
L7:4o
327.6
179.5
9.86
8.35
5.0
252.0
5.91
9.41
17:47 °
329.2
179.5
9.75
8.45
5.1
261.3
5.96
9.39
17:48
335.1
178. B
9.70
8.49
4.9
247.7
5.99
9.46
17:49
338.1
179.0
9.64
8.53
4.9
255.2
6.01
9.35
17:50
33B.2
180.2
9.65
8.52
5.0
243.1
6.02
9.24
17:51
337.1
180.7
9.75
8.46
5.0
256.2
6.00
9.29
17:5?
336.8
180.7
9.65
8.52
4.8
249.2
5.99
9.35
17:53
342.2
182.3
9.55
8.65
4.9
250.5
6.05
9.36
17:54
347.0
182.8
9.49
B.66
4.9
235.1
6.10
9.16
17:55
347.7
133.2
9,48
6.70
4.9
245.3
6.15
9.04
17:5b
347.2
1B2.7
9.52
8.62
4.9
238.3
6.12
9.01
17:57
346.6
183.5
9.55
8.65
5.1
245.4
t.ll
9.06
17:58
344.2
183.0
9.61
8.56
4.9
240.5
6.07
9.10
17:59
340.9
183.2
9.58
8.62
5.3
245.0
6.03
9.20
18:00
345.6 •
182.9
9.46
8.68
5.2
235.1
6.13
9.16
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST
15 MINUTES
18:00
340.2
181.5
9.62
8.56
5.0
246.7
6.G4
9.24
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE LAST HOUR: 60 AINUTES OF VALID DATA
18:00
330.7
160.9
9.66
8.52
4.3
243.7
6.00
B.94
19:01
351.5
183.7
9.39
8.76
5.0
233.2
6.16
9.19
18:02
359.7
184.9
9.20
8.93
5.0
219.1
6.24
9.09
13:03
361.9
165.1
9.25
8.91
5.0
219.3
6.29
B.87
13:04
362.8
163.3
9.22
B.91
4.9
215.2
6.26
8.64
18:05
361.0
104.7
9.37
8.80
5.0
219.5
6.24
8.62
C3RNENTS: End of Saiplinc
E-143
-------
CAL_ I BRAT I ON SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor
REASON: Final direct cal check (fourth)
DATE : OS—07—1990 TIME: 18:06 - 18:38
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
MONITOR
RESPONSE
BOILER
BOILER
ppmS02
ppmS02
0.0
218.0
I .
BOILER
BOILER
ppmNUx
ppmNOi;
(.) .
240.0
34.7
BOILER
BOILER
X 02
'/. 02
0.00
12. 50
0 .06
.2.5!?
10
10
BOILER
BOILER
*/. C02
V, C02
0.00
11 .01
0 . 04
1L.09
STACK
STACK-
STACK
STACK
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
ppm CO
ppm CO
0.0
181.2
(I). 0
457 . 5
1 . 2
178.0
11.2
465.7
STACK
STACK
*/. co:
•/. co:
0.00
11.01
-i.>. U3
10.84
HEARTH
HEARTH
>: o:
% o:
0.00
12. 50
0.08
12. 50
E-144
-------
C3*=*L_ X 12i SUMNAR>
SOURCE: Si.te 9 Sewage Sludge Incinoraor'
REASON: Recheck1 of Direct cal - S02 & NO;-:
DATE : 06-01-1990 TIME: 09:54 - 10:14
MONITOR GAS MONITOR
A/D CHAN DESCRIPTION UNITS VALUE RESPONSE
o BOILER ppmS02 0.0 3.5
6 BOILER ppmS02 218.0 218.2
6 BOILER ppmSQ2 361.4 365.3
7 BDILER ppmNOv: 0.0 1.6
7 BOILER ppmNOx 240.C 239.9
7 BOILER ppmNO;; 475.0 476.3
E-145
-------
CALIBRATION SUMMARY
SOURCE!: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor
REASON; Second direct cal (abbreviated two-point)
DATE : 96-01-1990 TIME: 16:07 - 16:26
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
MONITOR
RESPONSE
BOILER
BOILER
ppmS02
ppmS02
0. (!)
218.0
0.0
218,7
BOILER
BOILER
ppmNQrt
ppmNOx
0.0
240.0
0. 5
239.8
BOILER
BOILER
7. 02
"/. 02
0.00
12. 50
0. 06
12. 50
10
10
BOILER
BOILER
C02
y. C02
0.00
11 .01
0 .01
11.02
STACK
STACK
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
0, cj
181.2
1 .1
ISO . 9
STACK
STACK
ppm CO
ppm CO
0. c
1263.0
1.1
1.286.3
STACK
STACK
V. 02
>; l-2
0.00
12. 50
0 . 12
.1.2. 50
E-146
-------
CAL_. I BRAT I ON SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage? Sludge Incineraor
REASON: Initial system cal - 6/1/90
DATE : 06-01-1990 TIME: 16:29 - 16:40
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
MONITOR
RESPONSE
BOILER
BOILER-
BOILER
BOILER
ppmSO'
pprnNO:
"/- 02
7. 02
0. c.;
0. 0
0.00
12 . 50
0 . 4
0.8
0. 10
12.38
10
10
BOILER
BOILER
*/. C02
7. C02
o. oo
11.01
0.01
10.98
E-147
-------
CALIBRA
T I ON S
UMNARV
SOURCE:
Site 9 Sewaqe Sludge
Incineraor
REASON:
Initial direct cai —
6/2/90
DATE : t;
::6^02-1990 TIME:
10:11 - 11:2
MONITOR
GAS
MONITOR
fl/D CHAN
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
VALUE
RESPONSi
6
BOILER
ppmS02
0.0
0. 0
a
BOILER
ppmS02
218.0
217.2
6
BOILER
ppmSG2
361 .4
362. 4
7
BOILER
ppmNOx
0.0
-0.0
7
BOILER
ppmNOx
240.0
240. 5
7
BOILER
ppmNOx
475.0
479.0
8
BOILER
7. 02
0.00
0.14
8
BOILER
7. 02
12. 50
12.50
8
BOILER
7- 02
20.60
20 . 58
10
BOILER
7. C02
0.00
0.01
10
BOILER
7. C02
11 .01
11 .01
10
BOILER
7. C02
17.46
17.79
1
STACK
ppmTHC
0.0
1.0
1
STACK
ppmTHC
181 .2
182 .2
1
STACK
ppmTHC
282.0
284 .1
STACK
ppm CO
0.0
1 .2
STACK
ppm CO
457. 5
453.6
n
STACK
ppm CO
1263.0
12HB.4
3
STACK
7. 02
0.00
0.06
•_»
STACK-
7. 02
12. 50
12. 50
3
STACK
7. 02
20.60
20.64
E-148
-------
X BRAT X OfM SUMMARY
SCURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor
REASON: Second direct cal check (abbreviated two-point)
DATE : 0*6-02-1990 TIME: 17:37 - 18:15
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
MONITOR
RESPONSE
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ppmSO!
ppmSOl
ppmSO!
0.0
21B . 0
361.4
0.9
218.8
361. 0
BOILER-
BOILER
ppmNO:
ppmNO:
O. U
240.0
1. 0
:40.3
BOILER
BOILER
*/. 02
*/. 02
0.00
12. 50
0. OB
12. 50
10
10
BOILER
BOILER
•/. C02
"/. C02
0.00
11.01
0.01
10.92
STACK
STACK
STACK
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
0.0
181.2
282. 0
0.2
182.2
283. G
STACK
STACK
ppm CO
ppm CO
o. 0
1263.C
-O.
1282.7
STACK
STACK
% 02
*/. 02
< J . 0 0
12.50
12.50
E-149
c
-------
CALIBRATION SUMMARY
SOURCE: Site 9 Sewage Sludge Incineraor
REASON: Initial
DATE : 06-02-1990 TIME: 18:16 - 18:39
A/D CHAN
MONITOR
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
GAS
VALUE
MONITOR
RESPONSE
BOILER
BOILER
ppmS02
ppmS02
0 .0
218.0
1 .4
:06. o
BOILER
BOILER
ppmNOx
ppmNQx
0.0
240.0
1.1
237. 7
BOILER
BOILER
7. 02
*/. 02
0.00
12. 50
0 .08
12.42
10
10
BOILER
BOILER
7. C02
7. C02
U. 00
11.01
0.02
10.90
STACK
STACK
ppmTHC
ppmTHC
u . 0
181.2
0 .7
177. 7
STACK-
STACK
ppm CO
ppm CO
u. <->
1263.0
-0.7
1266.6
STACK
STACK
7. o:
7. o:
0 .00
12.50
0.1'
12.4'
E-150
-------
Appendix F
External Audit Report
F-l
-------
DRAFT
Review Summary
(Laboratory Analyses)
Technical Systems Review (TSR)
of
Entropy Environmentalists, Inc.
(and Various Subcontract Laboratories)
Conducted at
Entropy Environmentalists, Inc.
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.
Research Triangle Institute
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
Project Title
Emission Testing of Sewage Sludge Incinerators
OA ID No.: PQ-369
Laboratory Work Plan No.: 1754
EPA Technical PO: Dr. Harry Bostian
July 1990
F-2
-------
I. INTRODUCTION
On June 20-22, 1990, Technical Systems Reviews (TSRs) were performed at
three laboratories that are providing analytical support for the project entitled "Emission
Testing of Sewage Sludge Incinerators," a Category II RREL project. Entropy Environ-
mentalists, Inc./DEECO, inc., was the prime contractor for this project Table 1 lists
the laboratories reviewed and the analyses for which they were responsible. The sam-
ples, which were in various phases of analysis during these reviews, were from Site 9,
a multiple-hearth incinerator in Woonsocket, Rhode Island. Held testing at this site
was conducted May 28 through June 7, 1990.
TABLE 1. LABORATORIES REVIEWED AND ANALYSES FOR
WHICH THEY WERE RESPONSIBLE
Laboratory
Analyses performed
Research Triangle Institute (RTI)
Metals
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.
VOCs, SVOCs, Dioxins
Entropy Environmentalists, Inc.
Hexchrome, Gravimetric
Mr. Thomas Clark of PEI Associates, Cincinnati, Ohio conducted the TSRs for
RREL Ms. Cheryl Davis of DEECO, Inc., was present during most of the reviews.
The approved OA Project Plan (dated April 1990) was used as the foundation for the
TSRs.
II. RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE (RTI)
The RTI Laboratory is responsible for analyzing samples for total metals by use
of inductively coupled argon plasma emission spectroscopy (ICAP) and the proce-
dures specified in the draft EPA method "Methodology for the Determination of Trace
Metals Emissions in Exhaust Gases From Stationary Combustion Processes."
F-3
-------
Dr. Kate Luk, RTI Laboratory Manager, participated in the TSR and provided
information regarding laboratory operations. This laboratory is a small research-
oriented operation. Samples for this project are received by Dr. Luk and stored in a
locked room until analyzed. No formalized sample custody program or records docu-
menting sample custody exists at this facility. In view of the lab manager's personal
control of samples, the small number of samples processed, and the small staff, the
absence of a formal lab custody program did not present a concern relative to the
samples being analyzed for this study.
The samples generated during this study were not being analyzed during the
TSR. The lab manager had a copy of the approved QAPjP for this study, and the
EPA-approved and standard analytical methods for metals were on file in a looseleaf
notebook in the manager's office.
Minor Concern
Reviews of the laboratory data for sample analysis being conducted during the
TSR revealed that QA documentation was not in conformance with the level of QC
documentation required by the SW-846 methods that will be used to analyze samples
generated during this study. The QC procedures were posted at the AA instrument;
however, no procedures or SOP documenting QC procedures for the GFAA and ICAP
were posted for the analysts.
It is recommended that the laboratory manager provide the analysts with a copy
of the SW-846 methods or an SOP detailing the required QC checks for the samples
to be analyzed for this study before their analysis is begun.
III. TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
Triangle Labs is responsible for analyzing samples for volatile organics, semi-
volatile organics, and PCDD/PCDF by EPA SW-846 Methods 5040, 8240, 8270 and
8290.
Donald Harvan, Vice President Operations, and Dr. Hani Karam of Triangle
Laboratories were present during the TSR. Sample receiving and laboratory
F-4
-------
chain-of-custody procedures are acceptable. Sample preparation and analysis proce-
dures were in accordance with those specified in the methods. Calibration data and
QC checks were well documented for the samples being analyzed during this study.
Minor Concern
VOST tubes were being stored in the freezer sections of refrigerators prior to
analysis. This could result in the fracturing of VOST tubes containing samples col-
lected from a wet source because of the water in the tube freezing.
It is recommended that VOST tubes be stored at 4°C as specified in Method
0030, SW-846, 3d edition.
IV. ENTROPY ENVIRONMENTALISTS, INC.
The Entropy Laboratory is responsible for performing the gravimetric and hex-
chrome analyses. Gravimetric analyses of the sample train media are performed in the
Entropy Laboratory, whereas the hexchrome analysis is performed by Entropy person-
nel in an EPA laboratory. Mary Ellen Jackson, the Entropy Laboratory Manager, and
Cheryl Davis of DEECO, Inc., were present during this TSR.
Gravimetric and hexchrome analyses were being conducted in accordance with
procedures specified in the respective methods. Calibration and QA data were ap-
propriately documented for each of these methods.
V. CONCLUSIONS
No concerns were noted that could compromise the quality of the data gen-
erated from samples analyzed for this study at the three laboratories visited during this
TSR. Insufficient documentation of QC checks was noted at the RTI laboratory; how-
ever, this concern was considered minor because analysis of samples for this project
had not yet begun. Implementation of the QC check procedures and documentation
protocol specified in the methods selected for this study will ensure adequate docu-
mentation of data quality for samples analyzed at this facility. In general, data gen-
erated from laboratory analyses performed by the laboratories reviewed during these
F-5
-------
TSRs should be of adequate quality to meet the study objectives. A rating of satis-
factory was assigned to each laboratory visited.
A summary meeting was held at the conclusion of each TSR, during which
findings and corrective actions were discussed. Corrective Action Recommendation
(CAR) forms were completed and distributed to the responsible parties at these meet-
ings. Copies of the CAR forms are included as Appendix I of this report
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before complc
1. REPORT NO. 2.
EPA/600/R-92/003i
3 PB92-151638
4. TITw6 AND SUBTITLE
EMISSIONS OF METALS, CHROMIUM AND NICKEL SPECIES, AND
ORGANICS FROM MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER SLUDGE INCINERATORS
VOLUME IX: SITE 9 EMISSION TEST REPORT - APPENDICES
5. REPORT DATE
March 1992
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
William G. DeWees, Robin R. Segall
F. Michael Lewis
S. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Entropy Environmentalists, Inc.
Research Triangle Park
North Carolina, 27709
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO
B101
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO
Contract No. 68-CO-0027
Work Assignment No. 0-5
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory
Office of Research and Development
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Cincinnati, OH 45268
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final Report 1989 - 91
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
EPA/600/14
IS. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
EPA Technical Contact: Dr. Harry E. Bostian, (513) 569-7619, FTS: 684-7619
16. ABSTRACT
Site 9 is a secondary plant designed for 15 million gallons per day (MGD) of
wastewater flow. The sludge incinerator at Site 9 is a seven (7) hearth, multiple
hearth furnace (MHF) built by Nichols Engineering in 1974 controlled by an adjustable
throat venturi scrubber with a nominal pressure drop of 20 in. w.c.. After leaving
the venturi, the gases pass upward through a three (3) plate tray scrubber with a
Chevron mist eliminator. A 10 ft. x 10 ft., upflow, wet electrostatic precipitator,.
manufacturer by Beltr&n Associates, Inc., was. installed during the first week of
testing.The ratio of nickel subsulfide to total nickel in the emission at Site 9 is
extremely low, with the sulfidic nickel species being measured at less than detectior
limit (about 1 to 2 percent of the total nickel). The ratio of hexavalent chromium tc
total chromium in the emissions at Site 9 was significantly higher that had been
anticipated. Site 9 had only two semivolatile organic compounds detected under
normal and improved combustion conditions benzyl alcohol and benzoic acid* Several
additional compounds were found in the emissions for the normal or improved
combustion conditions at Site 9; these compounds were 1,4-dichlorobenzene,
1,2-dichlorobenzene, 2-nitrophenol, 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene, naphthalene,
2-methylnaphthalene, dibenzofuran, phenanthrene, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, phenol,
4-methylphenol, and 4-nitrophenol. The volatile organic compounds detected in the
Site 9 multiple hearth incinerator emissions were similar to the compounds reported
for Sites 1, 2, and 4 (other multiple hearth incinerator tested). Carbon
tetrachloride and carbon tetrachloride, reported in the emissions at the other three
sites, were not found in the emissions from Site 9.
17. KEY WORDS AND OOCUMENT ANALYSIS
a. DESCRIPTORS
b.lDENTlFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
c. COSATi Field/Cioup
Wastewater, sludge disposal,
incinerators, combustion products
combustion products
Emissions
chromium compounds
nickel compounds
total hydrocarbons
dioxin/furans
organic compounds
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
RELEASE TO PUBLIC
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
UNCLASSIFIED
21. NO. OF PAGES
(o!3
20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
UNCLASSIFIED
22. PRICE
CPA Form 222C-1 {fUv. 4-77) previous coition upMOLETF >
I
------- |