-------
Appendix L
QA/QC Program
Table of Contents
Sect ion Page
1 Demonstration Project Organization Chart L-2
2 internal Audit Reports L-4
3 Monthly Progress Reports L-46
4 Observer Method 9 Certifications L-86
5 American Medical Laboratory Quality Assurance L-92
6 Keystone Environmental Resources! Inc. Quality Assurance L-106
I-1
-------
Section 1
Demonstration Project Organization Chart
1,-2
-------
DEMONSTRATION PROJECT ORGANIZATION CHART
OPERATION/TESTING PHA8E
Attachment 4
EPA
C. Vogel
Pro|. Mtntfir
R. A. Fatilnger
Program Director
BSC
Operetlona Manager
lor KIDC Oemonitratlor
A. Baaoaka
Prolaot Englnaarlng
a. Sllvha
Baltary Operation*
A. Baaoaka
lull Contractor
KRESS. Inc
D. Farden
R. W. Reybuck
Qanaral Manager
Bparrowa Point plant
n.
B. C.Clement*
Senior Manager
X
Plant QA Deportment
Q. D. March
BBC - Corporata
OA Daparlmanl
D. Mongeon
R. Welnholfei
Supt.. Coke Omni
T
QA Manager
E. Fletcher
Protect Manager
C. Kelbal
Teat Coaaullant
C. R. Bymona
Sampling 1 Teetlng
Manager
A. Q. Oaaman
Data Manager
J. W. Paaquall
r
Coal I Coke
Quality
R. Qreenbaum
Hamptoa Roade
Taatlng Lab
II
BSC'a
Homer Raeearch
Laboratory
D. Fllnohbaugh
I
1
(Analy tlca
Sparrow* Point
Plant
Laboratory
F. T. Kowalciyk
BCM
Engineer*. Ins.
H. Alexander
and Teatlng Laboratoilea)
American
Medloai
Lab.
F. Grander
Door Emlaalon*
Monitoring
bem, INC
r-
k-
Quench Water
Monitoring
J. W. Paaquall
Area Monitoring
A. Q. Oeeman
BF Evaluation
J. Povaromo
Pualtlng Enlaa.
Monitoring
BCM. Inc.
Vldae Taping
R. T. Bewald
KRESS Bon
VOC
A. Q. Oairaan
-------
Section 2
Audit Reports
1,-4
-------
BETHLEHEM STEEL
SPARROWS POINT PLANT
Interoffice Correspondence
QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPAR'MENT
June 14, 1991
Ref:
from: G. D. Marsh, Superintendent, Quality Assurance
To: R. J. Weirhoffer, Superintendent, Coke Oven
Subject: 1991 INTERNAL QUALITY SYSTEM AUDIT
In compliance with the Corporate Quality Assurance Program, an Internal
Quality Assurance Audit was conducted in the Coke Over, on May 2, 1991. The
audit team members were:
E. A. Fletcher - Mgr. - QA Systems and SPC, Lead Auditor
R. A. Boehm - SPC Engineer
R. Charles - SPC Engineer
Specific audit results are attached, detailed as follows:
Category I
Audit Corrective Action Report (ACAR) - Audit findings which detail
significant non-conformances and/or deficiencies in the Quality system.
Category II
Audit Comments/Suggestions - Audit findings which would improve the
Quality System.
Category III
• Audit Isolated Significant Observation (Fix-It) - Audit findings which
appear to be isolated and generally reflect a deficiency in continued
adherence to established procedures.
Significant improvements have been made since the last Internal Audit
•n botn the documentation and implementation of the Quality System, a:so,
new control chart applications have been identified and implementec wni'e
the existing charts have undergone a complete review.
Primary areas of concern were identified as follows:
1. Identification of training requirements for individual positions
and the establishment of a documentation method
2. Documentation of product standards
3. Calibration of scales
L-b
-------
June 14, 1991
1991 INTERNAL QUALITY SYSTEM AUDIT
The KVSOP's for "B" coal chemical plant have been revised but are still
under review, and the associated process audit cards have not been revised.
At this point, a decision should be made to either expedite the finalization
cf the KVSOP's and audit cards or discontinue the effort and concentrate on
the development of the process standards for the new coal chemical process.
It was also noted that several of the KVSOP's for the batteries are
primarily related to environmental controls. In most,cases, these process
standards do not meet the strict criteria for the selection of key
variables. Even though the KVSOP system is the most appropriate place to
maintain the environmental standards and provides an audit process, a method
to discretely distinguish the environmental standards from the process
standards should be considered.
Other items of concern varied from area to area and are detailed in the
attacned report. An action plan to address each of the findings will be
developed by the Audit Team in conjunction with Coke Oven Operating and
Quality Assurance Personnel. Progress will be tracked by the lead Auditor
which will include, at a minimum, a formal quarterly review of progress.
G. D. Marsh
Superi ntendent,
Qua!ity Assurance
cc: R. W. Raybuck
B. R. Clements
C. W. Johnson
S. R. Kinghorn (C. Schramm) ACAR C0-G03-91
A. J. Wi11iamson
I. R. Arnett
F. W. Kowalczyk
File
EAr/dee
'Sli'cisaco/EAF3
r - ' ¦ "1
L-0 I
-------
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
AUDIT CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT (ACAR)
FAciLfTV/DEPT.
ACAR NO.
: UATE AUDITED:
Sparrows Point / CoKe Ovens
CO-GO 1-91
: 05/02/91
AUUITOR:
AKfcA:
Fletcher, Bcenm, Charles
. General
ESCORT:
DISCUSSED WITH: ""
A. Williamson
Various
DCCUMENT/PROCEOURE NO.
VERIFIED WITH:
QAM 6.3.1.2.1, 6.3.2.1.1, 6.3.2.1.3
Various
Personnel shall be evaluated and qualified on the basis of education, training
and/or experience, as required. Records of training and qualification shall be
maintained.
Employees performing inspection, testing and laboratory functions shall be trained
to the extent necessary to permit them to acquire the necessary skills for the
position.
Qualification evaluations shall be reviewed against established criteria and the
results documented for an employee to be qualified.
OBSERVATION:
Training is handled differently throughout all areas of the Coke Oven. Even though
some documentation is maintained, results are fragmented and incomplete. Due to
lack of *ormal documentation, filling temporary vacancies would be very suspect and
vulnerable to error. Training scope and requirements have not been clearly
ider.ti fied.
RECOMMENDATION:
Develop and implement a specific training program and documentation met.nod. The
training program should identify position requirements and qualifications.
CORRECTIVE ACTION RESPONSE: (INCLUDE TIMETABLE}
acar-fcrm
F 5359000(5-89)
L-7
I
-------
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
AUDIT CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT (ACAR)
HACILITY/DEPT.
ACAft NO.
: DATE AUDITED:
Sparrows Point / Ccke Ovens
C0-G02-91
: 05/02/91
AUDITOR:
AKtA:
Fletcher, Boehm, Charles
General
iSCORT:
DISCUSSED WITH:
A. Williamson
Various
DOCUMENT/PROCEDURE NO.
VERIFIED WITH:
QAM 5.3.2
,Various
STATEMENT OF REQUIREMENTS:
A procedure for selection/verification of suppliers of critical materials and
services shall be established and documented which Includes one or more of the
following: Supplier evaluation and approval system (Supplier Excellence),
self-assessment, source evaluation, audits, quality performance measurements,
receipt inspection and objective evidence of process control and/or product
control.
OBSERVATION:
A selection/verification procedure has not been established for suppliers of
critical services. For example, Console, Hampton Roads and Sampling Associates ail
supply a critical service to the Coke Oven.
RECOMMENDATION:
Establish and implement a selection/verification procedure *or the sjpplie'-s of
critical services.
c6rrecTIve action REsMnSE: (INCLUDE TIMETABLE)
acar-form
-5355000(5-89)
L-8
-------
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
AUDIT CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT (ACARJ
PACIL1TY/0CPT.
ACAR NO.
: DATE AUDITED:
Coke Ovens
C0-S03-91
: 05/C2/91
AUJITGR:
A^tA:
Fletcher, Boehm, Charles
Various
L5C0RT;
DISCUSSED WITH:
Arnett
Various
DOCUMENT/PROCEDURE NO.
vERifI£D WITH:
QAM 8.3.1
Various
STATEMENT OF REQUIREMENTS:
Calibration shall be performed on measuring and testing equipment used to evaluate
key process variables and specified product attributes in accordance with
MIL-STD-45662A.
OBSERVATION:
A significant amount of progress has. been made in the calibration program for
measuring and testing equipment used to evaluate key process variables and
specified product attributes. However, scales continue to be a weak part of the
program. Scales are maintained by bath the Local Electronics Unit (within the Coke
Oven) and the Plant Electronics Units (Ron Goetzke) dependent upon the age of the
scale. Local Electronics1 procedures are in compliance with plant calibration
requirements and test weight traceability has been established to the plant scale.
However, it was discovered that the procedures for initiating calibration of the
plant scale is very informal and the calibration is not consistently performed.
Awareness of the results of calibrations performed by Plant Electronics and the
frequency of calibrations has not been communicated well to the Coke Oven and has
not been incorporated into the overall Coke Oven calibration program. Test weight
traceability has not been established by Plant Electronics. Also, an outs'de
source is utilized to calibrate the scale at the Coal Moisture Test House.
RECOMMENDATION:
In order for Coke Oven Personnel to effectively manage the scale calibration
program, better communication must be established between Plant Electronics and the
Coke Oven Electronics Group. Also, the Plant Electronics Group must review
calibration procedures and make any necessary changes to be in compliance with
plant requirements.
A procedure must be developed and implemented to routinely initiate calibration of
the plant scale.
CORRECTIVE ACTION RESPONSE: (INCLUDE TIMETABLE)
acar-form
F5359C00(5-89)
-------
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
AUDIT CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT {ACAR)
FACILITY/DEPT.
ACAR NO.
: CATE AUDITED:
Sparrows Point Plant
C0-6C4-S1
: 05/02/91
AUDITOR:
AREA:
Fletcher, 3oehm, Charles
Various
ESCORT:
DISCUSSED WITH:
A. Williamson
A. Williamson
COCuMENT/PftOCEDuAE NO.
VERIFIED WITH:
QAM 7.3.4
A. Williamson
STATEMENT OF ACQUIREMENTS:
Product standards shall be developed and documented to identify the critical
product characteristics and acceptance criteria at each major stage of the process.
CBSEmrnmi
Appropriate standard practice instructions (product standards! have: not been
developed for Coal, Coke, and appropriate by-products.
RECOMMENDATION:
Develop the appropriate product standards to identify the critical product
characteristics and acceptance criteria.
JUKHLHIVE ACTION RfcSPONSt: (iNCLLl)e TIMtlABLk}
acar-forrr
F53 59000(5-89)
: L-K)
-------
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
AUDIT - COMMENTS / SUGGESTIONS
FACILITY:
: DATE AlDJTED:
Sparrows Point Plant
: 05/02/91
DEPARTMENT:
: AUDIIUK:
Coke Ovens - General
: Fletcher, Boehm, Charles
C0-G05-91
The unloading and segregation of coal is a very important aspect of the Coal
Handling Process and several measures are taken to prevent mixing of coal types in
the Coal Field. However, when a mix does occur, it is recommended that the
investigation and corrective action for the mix be documented. Therefore, a
procedure should be developed detailing the appropriate actions to be taken to
investigate mixed coal.
comnents
F5359200(5-89)
-------
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
AUDIT CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT (ACAR)
"Ac'llTY/DEPT.
ACAR NO.
: DATE AUDITED:
Sparrows Point Plant
C0-BA01-91
: 05/02/91
AuOITOft:
AREA:
Fletcher, Boehm, Charles
"A" 3attery
ESCORT:
J1SCUSSED WITH:
T. Baird
Various
uocument/1 Procedure no.
VtKIMfcl) WITH:
QAM 7.3.6, 7.3.9
Various
STATEMENT OF REQUIREMENTS:
Process standards, procedures or practices shall be developed, documented and
Implemented to establish the specific requirements necessary for process ccntrol to
ensure consistency in product and service quality.
Standards, procedures and practices shall be periodically monitored to verify
compliance with requirements.
.OKeRVATION:
Several KVSOP's require review and revision as follows:
1. 03.01.01 Pushing Schedule - 24 Hour Coke is not addressed
2. 03.02.02 Changing - Corrective Action does not address what is to be done if
the ovens are not charged in the proper sequence
3. 03.04.02 - Validity of current standard is questionable
4. Corrective Action - Many of the Corrective Actions appear to be very general in
nature and their effectiveness may be questionable
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Develop a time table for the various pushing schedules to cover all operating
scenarios.
2. Identify appropriate Corrective Action.
3. Statistically review validity of current standard and adjust as required.
4. Review all Corrective Actions to determine if more specific actions car. be
identified.
CORRECTIVE ACTION RESPONSE: (INCLuDt IIMUABUJ
acar-form
F5359000(5-89)
1-12
-------
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
AUDIT - ISOLATED SIGNIFICANT OBSERVATION
(FIX IT REPORT)
DATE: May 2, 1991
PLANT:
Sparrows Point Plant
AUDITOR:
Fletcher, Boehm, Charles
DEPARTMENT:
Coke Ovens 11 & 12 Batteries
ACCOMPANIED BY:
A. Benoska
LOCATION &
REFERENCE
NUMBER:
OBSERVATION:
COMMENTS:
CORRECT ACTION RESPONSE:
(USE REVERSE IF NECESSARY)
C0-BA02-91
C0-BA03-91
02.06.02 Gas Tending - Standard
is addressed in degrees fahrenheit and
and should be expressed in degrees
centigrade
02.05.01 KVSOP contains a large
process table
Revise KVSOP 02.06.02
Eliminate Process Table from
KVSOP and develop a SPI to be
referenced from the KVSOP
isulated/DG
-------
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
AUDIT CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT (ACAR)
"ACILITV/bEPT.
ACAR NO.
: DATE AUDITED:
Sparrows Point / Coal Chemical
C0-CC01-91
: 05/02/91
AUDITOR:
AREA:
Fletcher, Boehm, Charles
Coal Chemical
SSCOrT:
DISCUSSED WITH:
D. Saul
D. Saul
DOCUMENT/PROCEDURE NO.
VERIFIED WITH:
QAM 4.3.3
D. Saul
SlAFiMENT OF REQUIREMENTS:
Documents shall be distributed to and maintained at required work 'ocaticns.
OBSERVATION:
KVSOP's are not available to Operators at their work locations.
Example: Area of Primary Coolers/Tar Processing: Operating Engineer -Z does not
have KVSOP's in their office. Distribution QCP lists only General Foreman,
Supervisor, and Leader as only recipients of KVSOP copies.
RECOMMENDATION:
Broaden distrioution to include other locations for Operators including above
example.
CORRECTIVE ACTION RESPONSE: (INCLUDE TIMETABLE)
acar-form
F5359000(5-89)
1,-U
-------
BETHLEHEM STEEi. CORPORATION
AUDIT CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT (ACAR)
"AciilTY/DEPT.
ACAR NO. : OATE AUDITED:
Sparrows Point / Coal Chemical
C0-CC02-91 : 05/C2/91
SufclTOft:
AREA:
Fletcher, Boehm, Charles
"B" Coal Chemical Plant
tSCORT:
DISCUSSED WITH:
D. Saul
D. Saul
UCCIjment/procedure no.
vtKiKLD WITH:
QAM 4.3.4
D. Saul
STATEMENT OF .REQUIREMENTS:
4.3.4 Documents shall periodically be reviewed for accuracy and correctness and be
revised as appropriate.
OBSERVATION:
Discrepancies exist between KVSOP Process Standards and Audit /Cards for 3 Coal
Chemical Plant. Standards exist in following KVSOP's that are not included on
audit cards: (KVSOP's 07.01.02 07.10.01
07.06.01 07.10.05
07.07.01 07.11.01
07.07.03 07.13.01
07.08.01 07.13.02
RECOMMENDATION:
Complete revisions to B Coal Chemical Plant KVSOP's and ensure a'l Process
Standards are similarly included on Audit Cards. See suggestion C0-CC06-91
LUUHbCim ACTION RESPONSE: (INCLUUfc TIMETABLE)
acar-form
F5359000(5-39)
L-15
-------
BtTHLEHfM STEfL CORPORATION
AUDIT - I SOI ATE I) SIGNIFICANT OBSERVATION
(FIX IT REPORT)
DATE: May 2, 1991
TDtFTT
Sparrows Point Plant
TODTTOR:
K. Charles
DEPARTMENT:
Coke Ovens/ Coal Chemical
ACCOMPANIED BY:
I). Saul
LOCATION &
REFERENCE
NUMBER:
C0-CC03-91
"i
I
C0-CC04-91
C0-CC05-91
OBSERVATION:
COMMENTS:
KVSOP 06.02.01 indicates use of an
Individuals, Moving Range Chart
KVSOP 06.01.02 states, "Tar temp. 1n
full dehydrator must be maintained
between 80 and 90 degrees
Operator was reporting 90 degrees on
his report though temperature gauge,
after being wiped clean of grime,
read 100".
Q.A. Calibration -
Test Basin and Still PH:
Located in B Plant; acct.# N009 in
M1CS. Identity of instrument used to
perforin calibration is not made on
work order completed by technician.
Chart is actually an X-Bar,
R chart.
This incident underscores
implementation of Process
Standards that are valid and
Operators are familiar with.
See suggestions C0-CC06-91
Create a heading for instrument
serial # or 1.0. # oil work order
to be filled in by technician
CORRECT ACTION RESPONSE:
(USE REVERSE IF NECESSARY)
isolated/DG
-------
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
AUDIT - COMMENTS / SUGGESTIONS
FACILITY:
: DATE AUDITED:
Sparrows Point Plant
: 05/02/91
DEPARTMENT:
: AUDI 10k:
Coke Ovens / Coal Chemical
: R. Charles
C0-CC06-91
The key Issue for the Coal Chemical Plant relative to the Quality System at the
present, is the effective development and implementation of Process Standards in
conjunction with the new plant scheduled to start up 1n September.
Recommendation:
While undergoing training on the new Foxboro process control system, Operators are
monitoring hypothetical system pressures, temperatures, flow rates, etc. that are
the same as those that will be identified in Process Standards. Ideally, alongside
this training, Operator input can be used to develop Process Standards for the new
operations. Expected benefits would be:
* Development and review of Process Standards with Operators throughout
learning curve.
* Implementation of valid Process Standards as a result of Operator's
familiarity, "buy-in", of well reviewed Process Standards and KVSOP's.
* Quality System will be in place for start-up of the facility.
comments
F5359200(5-89)
1,-17
i
-------
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
AUDIT - COMMENTS / SUGGESTIONS
FACILITY:
: DATE AUDITED:
Sparrows Point Plant
: 05/02/31
"DEPRRTMEfiT:
: AUDITOR:
Coke Ovens / Coal Chemical
: R. Charles
Recommendation;
C0-CC07-91
Training and documentation of training of employees in spill prevention, time spent
in various positions, and or new Foxboro system is thorough and well maintained.
Documentation of Operator's time spent in various positions will become cuirbersome
after some time and would lead itself well to routine input into a computerized
system (HRIS, LOTUS, etc.)
Recommendation:
C0-CCQ8-91
Control Dept. Has made much progress, in development of a calibration system thru
use of MICS. System, Identification of quality arid environmental related
calibration requirements is a good idea. The only gap in the program is that
Instruments used to make calibration are not identified on MICS work orders that
Technician completes and this limits traceabiHty.
comments
F5 359200(5—89)
-------
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
AUDIT - ISOLATED SIGNIFICANT OBSERVATION
(FIX IT REPORT)
DATE: Hay 2, 1991
Kim : AUOTTOft:
Sparrows Point Plant : Fletcher, Boehm, Charles
DEPARTMENT: : ACCOMPANIED BY:
Coke Oven Lab. : M. Gould, M. Saddler
LOCATION & OBSERVATION: : COMMENTS: : CORRECT ACTION RESPONSE:
REFERENCE : : (USE REVERSE IF NECESSARY)
NUMBER: : :
C0-LAB01-91 : SKg NIST Class P weight was due for : Calibrate as required per
. : calibration on 11/22/90. Calibration : procedure.
: is significantly past due. :
l- CO-LAB02-91 : The Shelf Life of many of the : Develop & implement a system to
^ : chemicals used for analytical work : control the shelf life of ALL
° , : was questionable. : materials used by the lab.
isoluted/DG
-------
SPARROWS POINT PLANT
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPLY
ch^ck appropriate step:
ACAR ( X ) C0-G01-91
FIX IT ( )
SUGGESTION ( )
PRELIMINARY ( )
FINAL (
)
AREA:
General
OBSERvATIOn/RECOMMENDATION:
Training is handled differently throughout all areas of the Coke Oven. Even
though some documentation is maintained, results are fragmented and
Incomplete. Due to lack of formal documentation, filling temporary vacancies
would be very suspect and vulnerable to error. Training scope and
requirements have not been clearly identified.
Develop and implement a specific training program and documentation method.
The training program should identify position requirements and
qualifications.
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN:
/tscoi &
-------
SPARROWS POINT PLANT
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPLY
CHECk APPROPRIATE STEP:
ACAR ( X ) C0-G02-91
FIX IT ( )
SUGGESTION ( )
PRELIMINARY ( )
FINAL ( )
AREA:
General
ObStRVATIOh/RECOMHENDATION:
A selection/verification procedure has not been established for suppliers of
critical services. For example, Console, Hampton Roads and Sampling
Associates all supply a critical service to the Coke Oven.
Establish and Implement a selection/verification precedure for the suppliers
of critical services.
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN:
x s-zcecsr/F*^/t/
L-G /ZcTTL cf- c/2.""
%£ frsrrtsc/sstt) a*jl
JTx-^ PCA l* /u-r /er^j J;*
T~I> -4sS'Jr X^> 0*
«- J*M<" ff-f ¦ ffrr/e/?ss/yr'
iO'rrt 7#KJt /fit, 4.
mmmmMii: s_ ,ce7t,^ , c.
PROPOSED COMPLETION DATE: '
// ,'2u If/
corr/act/reply-EAF3
¦ ~-I.-?l'
-------
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
AUDIT CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT (ACAR)
(¦AcIlITV/dEpt.
ACAR NO.
: DATE AUDITED:
Sparrows Point / Coke Ovens
CO-GO 1-91
: 05/02/91
Auditor:
AREA:
Fletcher, Boehm, Charles
. General
ESCORT:
DISCUSSED WITH:
A. Williamson
Various
DOCUMENT/PROCEDURE NO.
VERIFIED WITH:
QAM 6.3.1.2.1, 6.3.2.1.1',. 6.3.2.1.3
Various
Personnel shall be evaluated and qualified on the basis of education, training
and/or experience, as required. Records of training, and qualification shall be
maintained.
Employees performing inspection, testing and laboratory functions shall be trained
to the extent necessary to permit them to acquire the necessary skills for the
position-
Qualification evaluations shall be reviewed against established criteria and the
results documented for an employee to be qualified.
OBSERVATION:
Training is handled differently throughout all areas of the Coke Oven. Even though
some documentation is maintained, results are fragmented, and incomplete. Due to
lack of formal documentation, filling temporary vacancies would be very suspect and
vulnerable to error. Training scope- and requirements have not been clearly
identified.
RECOMMENDATION:
Develop and implement a specific training program and documentation method. The
training program should identify position requirements and qualifications.
CORRECTIVE ACTION RESPONSE: (INCLUDE TIMETABLE)
acar-form
F 5359000(5-89)
L-7
-------
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
AUDIT CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT (ACAR)
fAciliTy/depT.
ACAR NO.
:. DATE AUDITED:
Sparrows Point / Coke Ovens
C0-G02-91
: 05/02/91
AUUITOR:
AREA:
Fletcher, Boehm, Charles
General
h5C0RT:
DISCUSSED WITH:
A. Williamson
Various
document1/Procedure, no.
VERIFIED WITH:
QAM 5.3.2
,Various
STATEMENT OF REQUIREMENTS:
A procedure for selection/verification of suppliers of critical materials and
services shall be established and documented which includes one or more of the
following: Supplier evaluation and approval system (Supplier Excellence),
self-assessment, source evaluation, audits, quality performance measurements,
receipt inspection and objective evidence of process control and/or product
control.
OBSERVATION: |
A selection/verification procedure has not been established for suppliers of
critical services. For example, Console, Hampton Roads and Sampling Associates all
supply a critical service to the Coke Oven.
RECOMMENDATION:
Establish and implement a selection/verification procedure for the suppliers of
critical services.
CORRECTIVE ACTION RESPONSE: (INCLUDE TIMETABLE)
acar-form
F5359000(5-89)
-------
BETHLEHEM 5TEEL CORPORATION
AUDIT CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT (ACAR)
WCIII1WPT.
ACAR NO.
: DATE AUDITED:
Coke Ovens
C0-G03-91
: 05/02/91
AUDITOR:
AktA;
Fletcher, Boehm, Charles
Various
tSCORT:
DISCUSSED WITH:
Arnett
Various
DOCUMENT/PROCEDURE NO.
vEftlFll-O WITH:
QAM 8.3.1
Various
Statement of requirements:
Calibration shall be performed on measuring and testing equipment used to evaluate
key process variables and specified product attributes in accordance with
MIL-STD-45662A.
OBSERVATION: :
A significant amount of progress has. been made in the calibration program for
measuring and testing equipment used to evaluate key process variables and
specified product attributes. However, scales continue to be a weak part of the
program.. Scales are maintained by both the Local Electronics Unit (within the Coke
Oven) and the Plant Electronics Units (Ron Goetzke) dependent upon the age of the
scale. Local Electronics1 procedures are in compliance with plant calibration
requirements and test weight traceability has been established to the plant scale.
However, it was discovered that the procedures for initiating calibration of the
plant scale is very informal and. the calibration is not consistently performed.
Awareness of the results of calibrations performed by Plant Electronics and the
frequency of calibrations has not been communicated well to the Coke Oven and has
not been incorporated into the overall Coke Oven calibration program. Test weight
traceability has not been established by Plant Electronics. Also, an outside
source is utilized to calibrate the scale at the Coal Moisture Test House.
RECOMMENDATION: ^
In order for Coke Oven Personnel to effectively manage the scale calibration
program, better communication must be established between Plant Electronics and the
Coke Oven Electronics Group. Also, the Plant Electronics Group must review
calibration procedures and make any necessary changes to be in compliance with
plant requirements.
A procedure must be developed and implemented to routinely initiate calibration of
the plant scale.
CORRECTIVE ACTION RESPONSE: (INCLUDE TIMETABLE)
acar-form
F5359000(5-89)
i
L-9
-------
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
AUDIT CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT (AGAR)
FACIL1TV/DEPT.
ACAR NO.
: DATE AUDITED:
Sparrows Point Plant
C0-604-91
: 05/02/91
AllDlTOft:
AREA:
Fletcher, 3oehm, Charles
Various
ESCORT:
DISCUSSED WITH:
A. Williamson
A. Williamson
DOCuMENT/PftOCEDuRg NO.
VERIFIED WITH:
QAM 7.3.4
A. Williamson
STATEMENT OF REQUIREMENTS:
Product standards shall be developed and documented to identify the critical
product characteristics and acceptance criteria at each major stage of the process.
(JURATION:
Appropriate standard practice instructions (product standards) have: not been
developed for Coal, Coke, and appropriate by-products.
RECOMMENDATION:
Develop the appropriate product standards to identify the critical product
characteristics and acceptance criteria.
OJKKktlllVE ACTION RkMSt: (INCLUUfc TIMLI AfclLLj
acar-form
F5359000(5-89)
L-10
-------
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
AUDIT - COMMENTS / SUGGESTIONS
FACILITY:
: DATE AUDITED:
Sparrows Point Plant
: 05/02/91
DEPARTMENT:
: AUliilUK:
Coke Ovens - General
: Fletcher, Boehm, Charles
CQ-GQ5-91
The unloading and. segregation of coal is a, very important aspect of the Coal
Handling Process and several measures are taken to prevent mixing of coal types in
the Coal Field. However, when a mix does occur, it is recommended that the
investigation and corrective action for the mix be documented. Therefore, a
procedure should be developed detailing the appropriate actions to be taken to
investigate mixed coal.
comments
F5359200(5-89)
-------
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
AUDIT CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT (ACAR)
FAClllTY/DEPT.
ACAR NO.
: DATE AUDITED:
Sparrows Point Plant
C0-BA01-91
: 05/02/91
auditor:
AREA:
Fletcher, Boehm, Charles
"A" Battery
ESCORT:
UISCUSSED WITH:
T. Baird
Various
DOCUMENT/PROCEDURE NO.
VtKlULU WITH:
QAM 7.3.6, 7.3.9
Various
STATEMENT 0F RECREMENTS:
Process standards, procedures or practices shall be developed, documented and
implemented to establish the specific requirements necessary for process control to
ensure consistency in product and service quality.
Standards, procedures and practices shall be periodically monitored to verify
compliance with requirements.
OBSERVATION:
Several KVSOP's require review and revision as follows:
1. 03.01.01 Pushing Schedule - 24 Hour Coke is not addressed
2. 03.02.02 Changing - Corrective Action does not address what is to be done-if
the ovens are not charged in the proper sequence
3.. 03.04.02 - Validity of current standard is questionable
4. Corrective Action - Many of the Corrective Actions appear to be very general in
nature- and their effectiveness may be questionable
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Develop a time table for the various pushing schedules to cover all operating
scenarios.
2. Identify appropriate Corrective Action.
3. Statistically review validity of current standard and adjust as required.
4. Review all Corrective Actions to determine if more specific actions can be
identified.
CORRECTIVE ACT ION RESPONSE: (INCLUDE HMtlABLt)
acar-form
F5359C00{5-89)
L-12
-------
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
AUDIT - ISOLATED SIGNIFICANT OBSERVATION
(FIX IT REPORT)
DATE: May 2, 1991
PLANT:
Sparrows Point Plant
AUDITOR:
Fletcher, Boehm, Charles
DEPARTMENT:
Coke Ovens 11 & 12 Batteries
ACCOMPANIED BY:
A. Benoska
LOCATION &
REFERENCE
NUMBER:
OBSERVATION;
COMMENTS:
CORRECT ACTION RESPONSE:
(USE REVERSE IF NECESSARY)
C0-BA02-91
C0-BAO3-91
02.06.02 Gas Tending - Standard
is addressed in degrees fahrenheit and
and should be expressed in degrees
centigrade
02.05.01 KVSOP contains a large
process table
Revise KVSOP 02.06.02
Eliminate Process Table from
KVSOP and develop a SPI to be
referenced from the KVSOP
isolated/UG
-------
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
AUDIT CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT (ACAR)
FAClLlTV/bEF'T.
ACAR NO.
: DATE AUDITED:
Sparrows Point / Coal Chemical
C0-CC01-91
: 05/02/91
AUDITOR:
AREA:
Fletcher, Boehm, Charles
Coal Chemical
SSCOrT:
DISCUSSED WITH:
D. Saul
D. Saul
DOCUMENT/PROCEDURE NO.
VERIFIED WITH:
QAM 4.3.3
D. Saul
STATEMENT OF REqulftEMEWS:
Documents shall be distributed to and maintained at required work locations.
OBSERVATION:
KVSOP's are not available to Operators at their work locations.
Example: Area of Primary Coolers/Tar Processing: Operating Engineer #2 does not
have KVSOP'S- in their office. Distribution QCP lists only General Foreman,
Supervisor, and Leader as only recipients of KVSOP copies.
kECOMHENDATIOto:
Broaden distribution to include other locations for Operators including above
example.
CORRECTIVE ACTION RESPONSE: (INCLUDE TIMETABLE)
acar-form
F53590QQ(5-89)
-------
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
AUDIT CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT (ACAR)
kAciliTV/DEPT.
ACAR W). ;
DATE AUDITED:
Sparrows Point / Coal Chemical
C0-CC02-91 :
05/02/91
Auditor:
AREA:
Fletcher, Boehm, Charles
"B" Coal Chemical Plant
ESCORT:
DI5CU5SED WITH:
D. Saul
D. Saul
OUCUMEhT/Procedure no.
VtmHED WITH:
QAM 4.3.4
D. Saul
STATEMENT OF REQUIREMENTS:
4.3.4 Documents shall periodically be reviewed for accuracy and correctness and be
revised as appropriate.
OBSERVATION:
Discrepancies exist between KVSOP Process Standards and Audit /Cards for B Coal
Chemical Plant. Standards exist in following KVSOP's that are not included on
audit cards: (KVSOP's 07.01.02 07.10.01
07.06.01 07.10.05
07.07.01 07.11.01
07.07.03 07.13.01
07.08.01 07.13.02
RECOMMENDATION:
Complete revisions to B Coal Chemical Plant KVSOP's and ensure all Process
Standards are similarly included on Audit Cards. See suggestion C0-CC06-S1
lUMKbCUVfc ACTION HfcSPONSE: (INCLUDE TIMETABLE)
acar-form
F5359000(5-89]
-------
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
AUDIT - ISOLATED SIGNIFICANT OBSERVATION
{FIX IT REPORT)
DATE: May 2, 1991
PLANT:
Sparrows Point Plant
AUDITOR:
R. Charles
DEPARTMENT:
Coke Ovens/ Coal Chemical
ACCOMPANIED BY:
D. Saul
LOCATION &
REFERENCE
NUMBER:
OBSERVATION:
COMMENTS:
CORRECT ACTION RESP0N5E:
(USE REVERSE IF NECESSARY)
C0-CC03-91
KVSOP 06.02.01 indicates use of an
Individuals, Moving Range Chart
Chart is actually an X-Bar,
R chart.
^ C0-CC04-91
i
KVSOP 06.01.02 states, "Tar temp, in
full dehydrator must be maintained
between 80 and 90 degrees ...
Operator was reporting 90 degrees on
his report though temperature gauge,
after being wiped clean of grime,
read 100°.
This incident underscores
implementation of Process
Standards that are valid and
Operators are familiar with.
See suggestions C0-CC06-91
C0-CC05-91
Q.A. Calibration -
Test Basin and Still PH:
Located in B Plant; acct.# N009 in
MICS. Identity of instrument used to
perforin calibration is not made on
work order completed by technician.
Create a heading for instrument
serial # or 1.0. # on work order
to be filled in by technician
isolated/DG
-------
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
AUDIT - COMMENTS / SUGGESTIONS
FACILITY:
: uarfcl AUDITED:
Sparrows Point Plant
: 05/02/91
DEPARTMENT:
: AUUilUK:
Coke Ovens / Coal Chemical
: R. Charles
C0-CC06-91
The key issue for ttie Coal Chemical Plant relative to the Quality System at the
present, is the effective development and implementation of Process Standards in
conjunction with the new plant scheduled to start up in September.
Recommendation:
While undergoing training on the new Foxboro process control system, Operators are
monitoring hypothetical system pressures, temperatures, flow rates, etc. that are
the same as those that will be identified in Process Standards. Ideally, alongside
this training, Operator input can be used to develop Process Standards for the new
operations.. Expected benefits would be:
* Development and review of Process Standards with Operators throughout
learning curve..
* Implementation of valid Process Standards as a result of Operator's
familiarity, "buy-in", of well reviewed Process Standards and KVSOP's.
* Quality System will be in place for start-up of the facility.
comments
F5359200( 5-89) —
L-ll
i
-------
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
AUDIT - COMMENTS / SUGGESTIONS
FACILITY:
: DATE AUDITED:
Sparrows Point" Plant
: 05/02/91
DEPARTMENT:
: AUDITOR:
Coke Ovens / Coal Chemical
: R. Charles
Recommendation:
CG-CC07-91
Training and documentation of training of employees, in spill prevention, time- spent
in various positions, and or new Foxboro system is thorough and well maintained.
Documentation of Operator's, time spent in various positions will become cumbersome-
after some time and would lead itself well to routine input into a computerized
system (HRIS, LOTUS, etc.)
Recommendation;
C0-CCQ8-91
Control Dept. has made much progress, irr development of a- calibration system- thru
use- of MIC5 System. Identification of quality and environmental related
calibration requirements is a good idea. The only gap in the program is that
instruments used to make calibration are not identified on MICS work orders that
Technician completes and this limits traceablllty.
comments
F5359200(5-89)
-------
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
AUDIT - ISOLATED SIGNIFICANT OBSERVATION
(FIX IT REPORT)
DATE: May 2, 1991
PLANT: : AUDITOR:
Sparrows Point Plant : Fletcher, Boehm, Charles
DEPARTMENT: : ACCOMPANIED BY:
Coke Oven Lab. : M. Gould, M. Saddler
LOCATION & OBSERVATION: : COMMENTS: : CORRECT ACTION RESPONSE:
REFERENCE : : (USE REVERSE IF NECESSARY)
NUMBER: : : :
C0-LAB01-91 : 5Kg NIST Class P weight was due for : Calibrate as required per
;—, : calibration on 11/22/90, Calibration : procedure.
: Is significantly past due. :
t-1 CO-LAB02-91 : The Shelf Life of many of the : Develop & implement a system to
4" : chemicals used for analytical work : control the shelf life of ALL
1X1 1 : was questionable. : materials used by the lab.
isoluted/DG
-------
SPARROWS POINT PLANT
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPLY
CheCK Appropriate step:
ACAR ( X } C0-G01-91
FIX IT { )
SUGGESTION ( }
PRELIMINARY ( )
FINAL ( )
AREA:
General
06$EhvATI0N/Rtt0hHENflATMh:
Training is handled differently throughout all areas of the Coke Oven. Even
though some documentation is maintained, results are fragmented and
incomplete. Due to lack of formal documentation, filling temporary vacancies
would be very suspect and vulnerable to error. Training scope and
requirements have not been clearly identified.
Develop and implement a specific training program and documentation method.
The training program should identify position requirements and
qualifications.
corrective action plan:
/tec#*, b* ^ q (MC/Ft s
ujftc bg c>€vei
-------
SPARROWS POINT PLANT
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPLY
cHECk appropriate step:
ACAR ( X ) C0-G02-91
FIX IT ( )
SUGGESTION ( )
PRELIMINARY ( )
FINAL ( )
AREA:
General
Ob^LftVATIOh/ftECOWENDATIOH:
A selection/verification procedure has not been established for suppliers of
critical services. For example, Console, Hampton Roads and Sampling
Associates all supply a critical service to the Coke Oven.
Establish and. implement a selection/verification precedure for the suppliers
of critical services.
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN:
A CecT/^/iy rr/i
c.eby)rL y4si'Sr Juff •-<>-* j fir
^AiT-sft-T' S?" u' ¦ fSrr ^ 1 I*-/^ rfss/jr'
iO'rf* 7a>KJI yfa/O, ¦ f//~s/<7 I
PERSON RESPONSIBLE: " ~—~
G, 73/^^2. s c. L-<"K
PROPOSED COMPLETION DATE: 9
// !2u l)/
corr/act/reply-EAF3 ~ — ,
-------
SPARROWS POINT PLANT
CORRECTrVE ACTION REPLY
CHECK APPRUPRlATt STtP:
ACAR ( X ) C0-G03-91 FIX IT ( )
SUGGESTION ( )
PRELIMINARY ( ) FINAL ( )
AKtA:
Various
OBSI-RMTIOS/RECOMMENDATION:
A significant amount of progress has been made in the calibration program for
measuring and testing equipment used to evaluate key process variables and
specified product attributes. However, scales continue to be a weak part of
the program. Scales- are maintained by both the Local Electronics Unit
(within the Coke Oven) and the Plant Electronics Units (Ron Goetzke),
dependent upon the age of the scale. Local Electronics' procedures are in
compliance with plant calibration requirements and test weight traceability
has been established to the plant scale. However, it was discovered that the
procedures for initiating calibration of the plant scale is very informal and
the calibration is,not consistently performed. Awareness of the results of
calibrations performed by Plant Electronics and the frequency of calibrations
has not been communicated well to the Coke Oven and has not been incorporated
into the overall Coke Oven calibration program. Test weight traceability has
not been established by Plant Electronics. Also, an outside source is
utilized to calibrate the scale at the Coal Moisture Test House.
In order for Coke Oven Personnel to effectively manage the scale calibration
program, better conanunication must be established between Plant Electronics
and the Coke Oven Electronics Group. Also, the Plant Electronics Group must
review calibration procedures and make any necessary changes to be in
compliance with plant requirements.
A procedure must be developed and implemented to routinely initiate
calibration of the plant scale.
CUKKECTIVE ACTION PLAN:
PhRSUN RESPONSIBLE:
PROPOSED COMPLETION DATE:
/ /
corr/act/reply-DG3
5.L«cj'jUnu>/c _
! L-22 ;
-------
SPARROWS POINT PLANT
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPLY
CHECK APPROPRIATE STEP:
ACAR ( X ) C0-G04-91
FIX IT ( )
SUGGESTION ( )
PRELIMINARY ( )
FINAL ( )
AKfcA:
Various
OBSERVATION/RECOMMENDATION:
Appropriate standard practice instructions (product standards) have not been
developed for Coal, Coke, and appropriate by-products.
Develop the appropriate product standards to identify the critical product
characteristics and acceptance criteria.
CORRECTIVE Action PLAN:
j>£X?b vcrr 6^.S" Uj'LL
!>$_o7> h oc 'J m eAJ
PERSON RcSPONSISl£ : 7™^ J——
HKUWJSKD COMPLETION DATE: ~
s?/Z 't 9/
corr/act/reply-0G3 / " C0t+/><'F7&
i L-23^ \
-------
SPARROWS POINT PLANT
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPLY
CHECK APPROPRIATE STEP:
ACAR { )
FIX IT ( )
SUGGESTION ( X ) C0-G05-91
PRELIMINARY (
)
FINAL { )
AREA:
Coke Ovens - General
OBSERVATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The unloading and segregation of coal is a very important aspect of the Coal
Handling Process and several measures are taken to prevent mixing of coal
types in the Coal Field. However, when a mix does occure, it is recommended
that the investigation and corrective actions for the mix be documented.
Therefore, a procedure should be developed detailing the appropriate actions
to be taken to investigate mixed coal.
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN:
5 A. t? C O M E < \j CaJ A T'&yJ*
PERSON RESPONSIBLE: ! 7777
A. VjtLL'A" '
PROPOSED COMPLETION DATE:
/ /
corr/act/reply-0G3
i. . L-24, • I
-------
SPARROWS POINT PLANT
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPLY
CHECK APPROPRIATE STEP:
ACAR ( X ) C0-8A01-91 FIX IT ( ) SUGGESTION ( )
PRELIMINARY { ) FINAL ( )
mm
"A" Battery
OBSERVATION/RECOMMENDATION:
Seveal KVSOP's require review and revision as follows:
1. 03.01.01 Pushing Schedule - 24 Hour Coke is not addressed
2. 03.02,02 Chairging - Corrective Action does not address what is to be
done if the ovens are not charged in the proper
sequence
3. 03.04.02 - Validity of current standard is questionable
4. Corrective Action - many of the Corrective Actions appear to.be very
general in nature and their effectiveness may be
questionable
1. Develop a time table for the various pushing schedules to cover all
operating scenarios.
2. Identify appropriate Corrective Action.
3. Statistically review validity of current standard and adjust as
required..
4. Review all Corrective Actions to determine if more specific actions can
be identified.
LUKKtCriVE ACTION PLAN:
T7rZ Ki/FdPS uJ/a, fi
-------
SPARROWS POINT PLANT
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPLY
CHECK APPROPRIATE STEP:
ACAR ( )
FIX IT ( X )C0-BA02-91
SUGGESTION ( )
PRELIMINARY (
) FINAL { )
AREA:
Coke Ovens 11 & 12 Batteries
OUSEfivATION/RttOMMMATION:
02.06.02 Gas Tending - Standard is addressed in degrees fahrenheit and should,
be- expressed in degrees centigrade.
Revise KVSOP 02.06.02
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN: .
u_;,CC Z
-------
SPARROWS POINT PLANT
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPLY
CHECK. APPWJPhlATE STEP:
ACAR ( )
FIX IT ( X ) CQ-8A03-91
SUGGESTION ( )
PRELIMINARY (
) final ( )
AREA:
Coke Ovens II & 12 Batteries
observatiqn/riICOMMENDATIOn :
02.05.01 KVSOP contains a large process table.
Eliminate Process Table from KVSOP and develop a SPI to be referenced from
the- KVSOP.
CORRECTIVE AcTIOn PlAH:
JL£VrS€~C> A-*Jt r> £
b £ '1/&COPTQ ^
PERSON RESPONSIBLE: ^ ^ . ~—7T~7™~=r
A. ££aJ0S£-<^ B. A&A/&7T^
PROPOSE COMPLETION DATE: '
<3/3// 9/
corr/act/reply-0G3
C-OJUfiZT&>
L-27 j
-------
SPARROWS POINT PLANT
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPLY
CHECK APPROPRIATE STEP: """""
ACAR { X ) C0-CC01-91 FIX IT ( )
SUGGESTION ( )
PRELIMINARY ( ) FINAL ( )
AKtA:
Coal Chemical
UKSERVATI0N/REC0MMENQAT10N:
KVSOP's are not available to Operators at their work locations.
Example: Area of Primary Coolers/Tar Processing: Operating Engineer #2 does
not have KVSOP's in their office. Distribution QCP lists only General
Foreman, Supervisor, and Leader as only recipients of KVSOP copies.
Broaden distribution to include other locations for Operators including above
example.
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN:
K\ysotr uj/cu &€ bis?-#. iQoTZb
PLUiiON RESPONSIBLE: —
WUM5ED COMPLETION UAiL:
corr/act/reply-DG3
UJ/LL «us"s
\aJ1u7T&J
L-2.8
-------
SPARROWS POINT PLANT
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPLY
CHECK APPROPRIATE STEP:
ACAR ( X ) C0-CCO2-91 FIX IT ( }
SUGGESTION ( )
PRELIMINARY ( ) FINAL ( )
AKfcA:
"8" Coal Chemical Plant
OSServATIOn/AECCiMMENDATIOn :
Discrepancies exist between KVSOP Process Standards and Audit/Cards for B
Coal Chemical Plant. Standards exist in following KVSOP's that are not
included on audit cards: (KVSOP's 07.01.02 07.10.01
07.06.01 07.10.05
07.07.01 07.11.01
07.07.03 07.13.01
07.08.01 07.13.02
Complete revisions to B Coal Chemical Plant KVSOP's and ensure all Process
Standards are similarly included on Audit Cards. See suggestion C0-CC06-91
OTmvTAmm™
/>CAx/-r 40hr7~
PERSON RESPONSIBLE: ^ S4VL , g. A/t
-------
SPARROWS.POINT FUWT
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPLY
CHECK APPROPRIATESTEP:
ACAR ( )
FIX IT ( X ) C0-CC03-91
SUGGESTION { )
PRELIMINARY (
) FINAL ( )
AREA:
Cake Ovens - Coal Chemical
KVSOP 06.02.01 indicates use of an Individuals, Moving Range Chart.
Chart iy actually an X-Bar, R chart.
COkRECTIVE ACTION PUN; .
Aaj x, M/i cjtstfur wu- usee.
PC/1. KsjS&P Cf. 01,6 /.
™Nkts™: o-sw.r.^rTr
PH0WSE0 COMPLETION DATE: " ' , ^
Mill/
corr/act/reply-EAF3
L-30
-------
SPARROWS POINT PLANT
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPLY
CHECK APPROPRIATE STEP:
ACAR { ) FIX IT ( X ) CQ-CC04-91 SUGGESTION ( )
PRELIMINARY ( ) FINAL ( )
MZF.
Coke Ovens / Coal Chemical
OBSERVATION/RECOMMENDATION: ~~ ——
KVSOP 06.01.02 states, "Tar temp, in full dehydrator must be maintained
between 80 and 90 degrees Operator was reporting 90 degrees on his
report though temperature gauge, after being wiped clean of grime, read. 100°.
This incident underscores implementation of Process Standards that are valid
and Operators are familiar with. See suggestions C0-CC06-91.
mterivE action plan: ;
p/LAC*nc. r> -
PLkiUN ULSPUNSIBLE: ^
PrOMSSD COMPLETION DATE:
en I?/
corr/act/reply-EAF3
CM?c
-------
SPARROWS POINT PLANT
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPLY
CHECK APPROPftlATT STEP:
ACAR ( ) FIX IT ( )
SUGGESTION ( X ) C0-CC06-91
PRELIMINARY ( )
FINAL ( )
aREA:
Coke Ovens / Coal Chemical
. ' i i » '
UIJiSERVATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The key issue for the Coal Chemical Plant relative to the Quality System at
the present, is. the effective development and Implementation of Process
Standards in conjunction with the new- plant scheduled; to start up in
September.
While undergoing training on the new Foxboro process control system,.
Operators are monitoring hypothetical system pressures, temperatures, flow
rates, etc. that are the sane as those that will be identified, in Process
Standards. Ideally, alongside this training, Operator Input can be used to
develop Process Standards for the new operations. Expected benefits would
be:
* Development and review of Process Standards with Operators
throughout learning curve.
* Implementation of valid Process Standards as a result of Operator's
familiarity, "buy-in", of well reviewed Process Standards and
KYSOP's.
* Quality System will be 1n place for start-up of the facility.
CORRECTIVE ACTION PUT:
K\JS0 PS PO/L aJSUj &*€>'<-
HAC F- JF- C/tC*t(CsfC f^CA^T
S\) CG T~/
PLkbON kt^MblBU: p-<5
-------
SPARROWS POINT PLANT
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPLY
CHECK APPROPRIATE STEP:
ACAR ( ) FIX IT ( ) SUGGESTION ( X ) C0-CC07-91
PRELIMINARY ( ) FINAL ( )
MT7H :
Coke Ovens / Coal Chemical
OB$EftvATION/RECOMMENDATION:
Training and documentation of training of employees in spill prevention, time
spent in various positions, and or new Foxboro system is thorough and well
maintained. Documentation of Operator's time spent in various positions will
become cumbersome after some time and would lend itself well to routine input
into a computerized system (HRIS, LOTUS, etc.)
CORRECTIVE ACTION PlAN:
THfS Is ErtT&kek 715 TfC
& 7.Z~/VAft 5
(haTs-, ' PC. t-Tlt)
PERSON RESPONSIBLE:
PROPOSED COMPLETION DATE: :
/ /
corr/act/reply-EAF3
c Of^fL FT £7)
i ; L-r33 ]
-------
a
x COKE OVENS - INTERNAL AUDIT
STATUS AS OF 09/11/91
1989 CORPORATE INTERNAL AUDIT
8 FINDINGS
8 COMPLETE
1991 PLANT INTERNAL AUDIT
18 FINDINGS
10 COMPLETE
OUTSTANDING FINDINGS
DESCRIPTION
CORRECTIVE
ACTION PLAN
PERSON
1. TRAINING PROGRAM
2. SERVICE VENDOR
AUDITS
3. COAL CHEMICAL
KVSOP*S
4. CALIBRATION
5. COAL MIX
PROCEDURE
6. DEVELOP PRODUCT
STANDARDS
A. DEVELOP RECORDS OF
QUALIFICATIONS
B. ESTABLISH TRAINWG
REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST
A. PERFORM AUDIT IF VENDOR
SUPPLYING CRITICAL
SERVICES (4 IDENTIFIED)
A. REVISE/COMBINE A * B
B» DEVELOP NEW
DISTRIBUTION
A. IDENTIFY STANDARD
INSTRUMENT BY SERIAL
NUMBER
A. DOCUMENT PROCEDURE
A. COAL
B. COKE
WILLIAMSON/
GEN FOREMAN
CORP QA/
FLETCHER
D. SAUL/
B. ARNETT
S. DOWNEY
WILLIAMSON
B. ARNETT
PROPOSED
COMPLETION
DATE
10/15/91
11/30/91
09/20/91
12/30/91
10/15/91
09/20/91
COMPLETE
L-34
" i
-------
COKE OVENS - INTERNAL AUDIT
STATUS AS OF 09/11/91
1989 CORPORATE INTERNAL AUDIT
8 FINDINGS
8 COMPLETE
1991 PLANT INTERNAL AUDIT
18 FINDINGS
10 COMPLETE
OUTSTANDING FINDINGS CONT
PROPOSED
CORRECTIVE PERSON COMPLETION
DESCRIPTION ACTION PUN RESPONSIBLE DATE
7. PAST DUE
CALIBRATION OF
5Kg NIST
CLASS P WEIGHT
8. SYSTEM TO
CONTROL SHELF
UFE OF ALL
CHEMICALS
CALIBRATE KOWALCZYK 10/01/91
DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT KOWALCZYK 10/01/91
SYSTEM
L-35
-------
/ I
oj
*,
Uhy
BY: -r.r./H^/K/cK
BADGE: 3/4 -IJ! €
CONTACT ( Ad)
ACCOMPANIED pf 05/M/KA
DISTRIBUTION
YES
NO
COMMENTS:
1. IS THERE A DISTRIBUTION QCP?
J
2. ARE THE QCP•S,KVSOP¦S AND SPI'S DISTRIBUTED PER THE
DISTRIBUTION QCP?
J
UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENTS
YES
NO
N/A
COMMENTS:
1. IS AREA VOID OF UNSIGNED OR UNDATED OP. INST.?
>/
XXX
2. ARE TEMPORARY SIGNED AND ORIGINAL DATE OF OP INST
LESS THAN 3 MONTHS OLD?
J
CHANGE LOG
YES
N/A
COMMENTS:
1. HAVE ANY CHANGES IN OPERATING PRACTICES, GRADES,
SUPPLIERS AND EQUIPMENT OCCURRED IN THE CURRENT QTR?
J
r
2. HAVE THE ABOVE CHANGES BEEN ENTERED INTO THE CHANGE
LOG SYSTEM?
YES
NO
N/A
COMMENTS:
y
DOCUMENT CONTROL
YES
NO
N/A
COMMENTS:
1. DO THE KVSOP'S HAVE THE APPROPRIATE SIGNATURES?
J
2. DO THE REVISION #'S AND EFFECTIVE DATES AGREE WITH THE
REVISION #«S AND EFFECTIVE DATES IN THE M.O. COPY?
•J
3. DO THE KVSOP'S REFERENCE THE SPI AND QCP'S WHEN
APPROPRIATE?
J
4. DO THE AUDIT CARDS AGREE WITH DOCUMENTS IN THE BOOK OR
IS THERE EVIDENCE A REVISION IS BEING PROCESSED?
J
-------
KVSOP'S
1. Ol-.Ol.Dl
2. dZ-.d*-- 03
3. <»*-~
-------
SPC CHARTS
area: ////l
BY: J.fT. FMNni cK
badge: 3/4-/?/*"
DATE: fft-ijll
YES
NO
N/A
IS SPC REQUIRED FOR THE AREA?
IF NO, DO NOT CONTINUE.
J
1. ARE THE SPC CHARTS IN THE AREA VALID APPLICATIONS?
A. CHARTS OF SINGLE MEASUREMENT THAT ARE X, MR OR
SPECS OR TOLERANCE CHARTS.
B. X-BAR, R CHARTS
C. ATTRIBUTE CHARTS (P CHART)
D. OTHER:
J
2. ARE THE LIMITS APPLICABLE TO THE CONTROL CHART?
X-BAR, R CHARTS MUST HAVE CONTROL LIMITS
NOT SPECIFICATIONS.
J
3. ARE THE DATA POINTS PLOTTED CORRECTLY ON THE CHART
(X-BAR, INDIVIDUALS, RANGES)?
J
4. ARE OUT OF CONTROL POINTS DOCUMENTED ON THE CHART?
J
-j
MOTCI *HTlL Tttlt ^OfTH, 0*r OF ClMrKtJ-
WfAt fi 9 Vtl* 01* 1= •/ICAAA/'-f
5. IS THERE A REVISION # AND DATE ON THE CHART?
J
Hep'AX. 0*7 HfoT «v tw£ c>/a>h . J TAnrim 4-
tHij Jwt 014.IHHM
6. IS THE BASE PERIOD FOR CALCULATION OF THE CONTROL
LIMITS IDENTIFIED?
J
\_Tt> flfrcnAfny tN TWt WAfcr.
KVvfof 0 1,0*. Of ftEAT/Ati "" W TEf\fS.~
'-HAtfs IN All i\x" »<\TTCfV< CAHf-l /LoflAy
I
02/04/91
-------
P&ES THE UNIT/PROCESS
EQUIPMENT REQUIRE CALI-
BRATION MAINTENANCE?
VES
J
N/A
A
DOES THE SYSTEM HAVE
POSITIVE IDENTIFICATION t
CONTROL OF ALL MEASURING
DEVICES? Jt/U/U- NiS.
YES
NO
/
N/A
B
13 THERE AN ESTABLISHED
FREQUENCY OP CALIBRATION
FOR ALL EQUIPMENT?
YES
J
NO
N/A
C
ARK HE CORDS OF CALIBRATION
KEPT?
7
NO
N/A
D
DO CALIBRATION RECORDS
INCLUDE AS FOUND/AS LEFT
RESULTS?
YES
v/
NO
N/A
E
DO CALIBRATION RECORDS
IDENTIFY THE PIECE OF
EQUIPMENT USED TO HAKE THE
CALIBRATION?
YES
J
HO
N/A
PL
: K
u>
ARE STANDARDS TRACEABLE TO
N.I.S.T. OR OTHER
ACCEPTABLE SOURCE?
YES
J
NO
N/A
IS THERE A SYSTEM (LABELS
OR EQUIVALENT) TO INDICATE
DATE OF CALIBRATION, BY
WHOM AND NEXT DUE DATE?
YES
J
NO
N/A
H
ARE THERE DOCUMENTED
CALIBRATION PROCEDURES
(DO0.U8 GOVT.MFG.BSCO)?
YES
J
NO
N/A
I
OOES THE PROCEDURE INCLUDE
AN ACCEPTABLE TOLERANCE
(RANGE,PARAMETER) FOR THE
ACCURACY OP THE INSTRUMENT
CHARACTERISTIC BEING
CALIBRATED?
YES
J
NO
N/A
J
DOES THE PROCEDURE
ADDRESS CORRECTIVE ACTION
FOR THE PRODUCT PRODUCED
DURING THE OUT OF
CALIBRATION PERIOD?
YES
NO
N/A
comments
/,A ~ J"i:/UAL NOS. WKO Tt ȣ
f\rJ)tML9 To THJC f)r
-------
((^') °/') /P.Yhdluu
QUALITY SYSTEM AUDIT ' IdATE: 7-8-91
DEPARTMENT: yX}/
AREA: CImL tMkidiiM
BY: #£M/llE£
BADGE: -aS2.
CONTACT: <7
ACCOMPANIED: jr
DISTRIBUTION
YES
NO
COMMENTS:
1- IS THERE A DISTRIBUTION QCP? CO¦ QAG -OOZ
t/
2. ARE THE QCP' S, KVSOP¦ S AND SPI'S DISTRIBUTED PER THE
DISTRIBUTION QCP?
~
UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENTS
YES
NO
N/A
COMMENTS:
1. IS AREA VOID OF UNSIGNED OR UNDATED OP. INST.?
/
XXX
2. ARE TEMPORARY SIGNED AND ORIGINAL DATE OF OP INST
LESS THAN 3 MONTHS OLD?
l/
CHANGE LOG
YES
N/A
COMMENTS:
1. HAVE ANY CHANGES IN OPERATING PRACTICES, GRADES,
SUPPLIERS AND EQUIPMENT OCCURRED IN THE CURREHT QTR?
/
2. HAVE THE ABOVE CHANGES BEEN ENTERED INTO THE CHANGE
LOG SYSTEM?
YES
NO
N/A
COMMENTS:
~
DOCUMENT CONTROL
YES
NO
N/A
COMMENTS:
1. DO THE KVSOP*S HAVE THE APPROPRIATE SIGNATURES?
~
2. DO THE REVISION #'S AND EFFECTIVE DATES AGREE WITH THE
REVISION #'S AND EFFECTIVE DATES IN THE M.O. COPY?
/
3. DO THE KVSOP'S REFERENCE THE SPI AND QCP'S WHEN
APPROPRIATE?
/
4. DO THE AUDIT CARDS AGREE WITH DOCUMENTS IN THE BOOK OR
IS THERE EVIDENCE A REVISION IS BEING PROCESSED?
/
ft/PTE .* /*f£W0l/T Jjurf/lt "a/01 iAZsrf /"PJo/l&f/
/flr S/)/j yiv,
-------
SELECT AT RANDOM
KVSOP'S REV # REV DATE YES NO
Q/. iS.Of 3 'o/"/s9 ill —
2. e>4,o! S to/u Js/ TedJouse
~ N°3 Station
-------
SPC CHARTS
AREA: doAi /Jah&ua/G
BY:
BADGE: -os2
DATE S ^ py
YES
NO
N/A
IS SPC REQUIRED FOR THE AREA?
IF NO, DO NOT CONTINUE.
/
1. ARE THE SPC CHARTS IN THE AREA VALID APPLICATIONS?
A. CHARTS OF SINGLE MEASUREMENT THAT ARE X, MR OR
SPECS OR TOLERANCE CHARTS.
B. X-BAR, R CHARTS
C- ATTRIBUTE CHARTS (P CHART)
D. OTHER:
/
ArrtfOf af,04 o/ stzs covr&>tr-
% Vf "or A"SS
Xvsop o/. os.o/ £>jr/a C0AS7XOL.
X. & Mi it /¦£/ .
2. ARE THE LIMITS APPLICABLE TO THE CONTROL CHART?
X-BAR, R CHARTS MUST HAVE CONTROL LIMITS
NOT SPECIFICATIONS.
/
3. ARE THE DATA POINTS PLOTTED CORRECTLY ON THE CHART
(X-BAR, INDIVIDUALS, RANGES)?
~
4. ARE OUT OF CONTROL POINTS DOCUMENTED ON THE CHART?
OUT-OP-court"'- flOtUrt W/fH/At SPBC 4A)B w
JH/s /Atxrjwca S£*>erir/At- ft Qcaa. a'.o*.af
5. IS THERE A REVISION # AND DATE ON THE CHART?
/
6. IS THE BASE PERIOD FOR CALCULATION OF THE CONTROL
LIMITS IDENTIFIED?
/
02/04/91
-------
calibration system audit
1.
DOES THE UNIT/PROCESS
EQUIPMENT REQUIRE CALI-
BRATION MAINTENANCE?
YES
/
N/A
A
DOES THE SYSTEH HAVE
POSITIVE IDENTIFICATION t
CONTROL OF ALL MEASURING
DEVICES?
YES
/
NO
N/A
B
IS THERE AN ESTABLISHED
FREQUENCY OF CALIBRATION
FOR ALL EQUIPMENT?
VES
~
NO
H/A
C
ARE RECORDS OF CALIBRATION
KEPT?
YES.
V
NO
N/A
D
DO CALIBRATION RECORDS
INCLUDE AS FOUND/AS LEFT
RESULTS?
YES
l/
NO
N/A
E
DO CALIBRATION RECORDS
IDENTIFY THE PIECE OF
EQUIPMENT USED TO HAKE THE
CALIBRATION?
YES
HO
l/
H/A
F
ARE STANDARDS TRACEABLE TO
N.I.S.T. OR OTHER
ACCEPTABLE SOURCE?
YES
NO
H/A
c/
I-1
IS THERE A SYSTEH (LABELS
OR EQUIVALENT) TO INDICATE
YES
NO
N/A
F--
DATE OF CALIBRATION. BY
./
Uj i
HHOH AND NEXT DUE DATE?
H
ARE THERE DOCUMENTED
CALIBRATION PROCEDURES
(DOD.US GOVT,HFC, BSCO) ?
YES
/
NO
N/A
I
DOES THE PROCEDURE INCLUDE
AM ACCEPTABLE TOLERANCE
(RAMCE,PARAMETER) FOR THE
ACCURACY OF THE INSTRUMENT
CHARACTERISTIC BEING
CALIBRATED?
YES
/
NO
N/A
J
DOES THE PROCEDURE
ADDRESS CORRECTIVE ACTION
FOR THE PRODUCT PRODUCED
DURING THE OUT OF
CALIBRATION PERIOD?
YES
NO
N/A
/
COHHENTS (SVS6P C/.OS.O/ SfA L£S
frecjiifncy (vvfftAA it und^rs-Jocd, 6"*
no /n-*/ tiuf da** appears On -/tirm
4kW ¦>/."'ir/?> cprrsfL/Pf .
B
CALIBRATION SYSTEM AUDIT
I.
ARE HAND TOOLS (TAPES/
MICROMETERS) USED FOR
MEASURING AND TESTING OF
PRODUCT?
YES
N/A
/
A
IS THERE A CALIBRATION
SYSTEM?
YES
NO
N/A
B
DOES THE SYSTEH HAVE
POSITIVE IDENTIFICATION «
CONTROL OF ALL MEASURING
DEVICES?
YES
NO
N/A
C
IS THERe AN ESTABLISHED
FREQUENCY OF CALIBRATION
FOR ALL EQUIPMENT?
YES
NO
N/A
D
ARE RECORDS OF CALIBRATION
KEPT?
YES
NO
N/A
E
DO CALIBRATION RECORDS
INCLUDE AS POUND/AS LEFT
RESULTS?
YES
NO
N/A
F
DO CALIBRATION RECORDS
IDENTIFY THE PIECE OF
EQUIPMENT USED TO HAKE THE
CALIBRATION?
YES
HO
N/A
G
ARE STANDARDS TRACEABLE TO
N.I.S.T. OR OTHER
ACCEPTABLE SOURCE?
YES
NO
H/A
H
IS THERE A SYSTEM (LABELS
OR EQUIVALENT) TO INDICATE
DATE OF CALIBRATION, BY
HHOH AHD NEXT DDE DATE?
YES
NO
N/A
I
ARE THERE DOCUMENTED
CALIBRATION PROCEDURES
(DOD.US GOVT,HFG,BSCO)?
YES
NO
N/A
J
DOES THE PROCEDURE INCLUDE
AM ACCEPTABLE TOLERANCE
(RANGE, PARAMETER) FOR THE
ACCURACY OF THE INSTRUMENT
CHARACTERISTIC BEING
CALIBRATED?
YES
NO
N/A
K
DOES THE PROCEDURE
ADDRESS CORRECTIVE ACTION
FOR THE PRODUCT PRODUCED
DURING THE OUT OF
CALIBRATION PERIOD?
YES
NO
H/A
COMMENTS
C CALIDRATton SYSTEM AUDIT
. ARE INSTRUMENTS (ROCKWELL,
ROFILOMETER,TENSILE TESTER.LAB.
QUIPHENT ETC. ) USED TO DETERMINE
RODUCT ACCEPTANCE?
YES
N/A
IS THERE A CALIBRATION
SYSTEM?
YES
NO
N/A
B DOES THE SYSTEM HAVE
POSITIVE IDENTIFICATION t
CONTROL OF ALL MEASURING
DEVICES?
YES
NO
N/A
IS THERE AN ESTABLISHED
FREQUENCY OF CALIBRATION
FOR ALL EQUIPMENT?
YES
NO
H/A
ARE RECORDS OF CALIBRATION
KEPT?
NO
N/A
DO CALIBRATION RECORDS
INCLUDE AS FOUND/AS LEFT
RESULTS?
YES
NO
N/A
DO CALIBRATION RECORDS
IDENTIFY THE PIECE OF
EQUIPMENT USED TO HAKE THE
CALIBRATION?
YES
N/A
ARE STANDARDS TRACEABLE TO
N.I.S.T. OR OTHER
ACCEPTABLE SOURCE?
YES
NO
H/A
19 THERE A SYSTEM (LABELS
OR EQUIVALENT) TO INDICATE
DATE of CALIBRATION, BY
WHOM AND NEXT DUB DATE?
YES
NO
N/A
ARE THERE DOCUMENTED
CALIBRATION PROCEDURES
(DOD,US GOVT,HFC,BSCOJ?
N/A
DOES THE PROCEDURE INCUJDE
AN ACCEPTABLE TOLERANCE
(RANGE, PARAMETER) FOR THE
ACCURACY OF THE INSTRUMENT
CHARACTERISTIC BEING
CALIBRATED?
YES
N/A
DOES THE PROCEDURE
ADDRESS CORRECTIVE ACTION
FOR THE PHODUCT PRODUCED
DURING THE OUT OF
CALIBRATION PERIOD?
YES NO
N/A
COMMENTS
-------
AUDITS OF COKE OVENS PROCESS STANDARDS
11/12 BATTERIES % NON-COMPLIANCE
% NON-COMPLIANCE
10
9
0
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
mm
05/25 06/22 07/20 08/17 09/14 10/12 11/09 12/07 01/04
~ - 100% COMPLIANCE
COKE OVENS - 11/12 BATTERIES
KVSOP CHECKLIST CARD ANALYSIS - BIHEEK'E ll'25'9i
02.01 01A
TASK
DAMPER OUT. ARE DAMPERS DOWN SEAL INC OFF FOUL CAS FROH THE OVEN
S
-------
AUDITS OF COKE OVENS PROCESS STANDARDS
COAL HANDLING % NON-COMPLIANCE
NON-COMPLIANCE
05/25 06/22 07/20 08/17 09/14 10/12 11/09 12/07 01/04
• - 100% COMPLIANCE
-------
Section 3
Monthly Progress Reports
L-46
-------
KIDC DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
SPARROWS POINT, MARYLAND
MONTHLY REPORT OF
SAMPLING AND TESTING PROGRAM ACTIVITIES
NOVEMBER, 1991
GENERAL OVERVIEW
The performance demonstration of the Kress system continued in November.
Visible emission observations continued to be performed during the month and
coke samples continued to be obtained. In addition, video recordings of both the
conventional pushes and Kress pushes were made. Other activities related to the
baseline sampling and analysis program continued during the month. Testing of
the Kress system ended on November 26 as a result of the idling of the coke
batteries in early December. Attachment 1 indicates the percent completion of
the various, aspects of the sampling and testing program through the end of
November. Compilation and analysis of all data collected during the testing
program will be performed during December and January.
Project Team Meetings
A. meeting was held on December 5 with all personnel involved in the testing
program to discuss the concent and format of the final report. A follow up
meeting will be scheduled for early January to evaluate progress on the data
analysis currently being performed.
Demonstration Program
The Kress system accepted a total of 112 pushes during the performance testing
in November. During Octobeti a total of 1S8 pushes were accepted rather than the
159 pushes reported last month. This gives a total of 321 pushes accepted by the
Kress system since start up in June. Visible emission observations continued in
November and samples of the Kress coke were obtained. Video recordings of both
the Kress and conventional pushes were made during this period as well.
QA/QC Activities
As a result of the audit performed by EPA's contractor in October, visible
emission observations were performed of five Kress pushes by three certified
observers at the same time. The results of this QA/QC activity are presented in
attachment 2.
L-47
-------
-2-
COflL AND COKE QUALITY
Coke Screening
One sample of Kress coke was obtained for every set of chree pushes taken by
Kress in November. These samples were in addition to the conventional quenched
coke samples which continued to be collected. These samples are being screened
to evaluate the size differential between this coke and conventional quenched
coke. This information will be used to evaluate the impact on blast furnace
performance.
Drop Shatter Test
Drop Shatter Testing of Kress coke- continued in November.
Hampton Roaos Testing Lab
Testing or Kress coke for coke reactivity index (CRI) and coke strength after
reaction (CSR) continued to be conducted by Hampton Roads Testing Lab in
November. These data will be compared to the CRI/CSR data for conventional
quenched coke over the same period.
BLAST FURNACE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Bethlehem's research department has begun an evaluation of the Kress coke
quality data so that inputs to the Balwax model can be developed. This model
will be used to determine cost advantages or disadvantages of using Kress coke
vs. conventional quenched coke.
DOOR EMISSIONS MONITORING
Collection of jaily door emission data continued during the month.
PUSHING EMISSION MONITORING
Visible emission observations of Kress pushes continued to be performed by BCM,
Inc. throughout November.
QUENCH WATER MONITORING
Sampling of quench and makeup waters continued in November.
L-48. |
-------
-3-
Nov#mber, 1991
Monthly Report
VIDEO TAPING
Video taping of conventional and Kress pushes continued in November.
AREA MONITORING
Baseline samples not suspended particulate and benzene soluble matter in the
area of the coke door machine continued in November. In addition, samples were
obtained in November from the Kress carrier.
KRESS BOX VOC MEASUREMENTS.
Testing of the Kress boxes by Keystone Environmental Resources was conducted on
October 20 & 31. This testing was performed to determine a number of volatile i
semi-volatiie organics including polynuclear aromatics, phenols, cresols, and
phthalates held within the box during the cooling cycle. A report of the testing
results from Keystone is expected by the middle of December.
KRESS BOX HEAT TRANSFER CALCULATIONS
Bethlehem's Research Group has agreed to assist in performing heat transfer
calculations from the Kress box. These calculations were begun in November.
Prepared by: A. G. Ossman
December 10, 1991
L-49
-------
December 10, 1991
ATTACHMENT 1
KRESS TESTING - PERCENT COMPLETION OF BASELINE TEST PLAN THROUGH NOVEMBER
Coal Analyses
No. of Samples
Completed
262 days
No. of Samples
Needed
mo days
Percent
Complet ion
>100%
Coke Analyses
Hampton Roads
(CRI/CSR)
Drop Shatter Test
VEO Pushing/Travel
VEO Pushing
( from TS.- PS)
Video Pushing/
Travel/Discharge
Door Emissions.
Quench Water-TCLP
Makeup Water-TCLP
Quench Chem. Anal.
MaKeup Chen. Anal.
Area Samples
GC/MS
GC/MS-QA
SP
ESQ
SP/BSO-QA
Amb. Air
277 days.
152 days
35
580 pushes
528 pushes
23 days
180
3
3
19
18
3
0
53
46
4
2
180 days
180 days
40
260
260
13
180
3
3
25
25
6
1
50
50
5
3
>100%
84%
88%
>100%
>100%
>100%
100%.
100%
100%
76%
72%
50%
0
>100%
92%
8G%
S6 %
\ L-50
-------
-2-
December 10, 1991
KRESS TESTING - PEBCENT COMPLETION FOR DEMONSTRATION TEST PLAN
THROUGH NOVEMBER
Coke Analyses
Hampton Roads
(CRI/CSR)
Drop Shatter Test
VEO Pushing/Travel
VEO Pushing
(£rom Ts/PS)
VEO Cooling Cycle
VEO Kress Burner
Video Pushing/
Travel
No. of Samples
Completed
90
90
72
29
29
0
29
39
Video Ccoiing/Discharge 27
Video Burner
Door Emissions
Makeup Chem. Anal.
Area Samples
GC.'MS
GC.MS-QA
SP
BSO
SP/BSO-QA
Kress Box Test
34
SI
3
15
15
L»
1
No. of Samples
Needed
150
150
40
98 (days)
98 (days)
ISO (days)
98 (days)
46 (pushes)
30
30
180
3
S
1
50
50
5
1
Percent
Complet ion
60%
60%
>100%
30%
30%
0
30%
85%
90%
>100%
34%
100%
0
0
30%
30%
0
100%
¦1
Lr51 I
'"¦v !
-------
ATTACHMENT 2
KRESS PUSHING EMISSION OBSERVATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DATA
NOVEMBER 25,
1991
OPACITY
Max. | Max.
| Max.
Stack | Stack
1 Opacity
Opacity|Opacity
I Box/Jamb
Before | After
1 Interface
Ignition|lgnition
1
OVEN NO.
OBSERVER 1
OBSERVER 2
OBSERVER 3
AVERAGE
1148
25/5/25
20/10/25
25/5/20
23.3/6.7/23.3
1151*
40/-/-
40/-/-
40/-/-
40/—/—
1153
20/10/10
15/10/10
10/10/15
15/10/11.7
1149
15/5/5
10/10/10
15/5/10
13.3/6.7/8.3
1172
20/10/10
15/15/10
15/10/10
16.7/11.7/10
AVERAGE
24/7.5/12.5
20/11.2/13.8
21/7.5/13.8
21.7/3.8/13.3
CUMULATIVE TIME OF EMISSIONS
Seconds|Seconds
During |Dur ing
Push (Travel
OVEN NO.
1148
1151
1153
1149
1172
AVERAGE
OBSERVER 1
60/-10
71/203
107/85
108/149
91/165
87.4/128.4
OBSERVER 2
66/43
75/200
110/85
79/152
83/175
82.6/131
OBSERVER 3
67/40
74/200
109/83
90/150
90/170
86/128.6
AVERAGE
54.3/41
73.3/201
108.7/04.3
92.3/150.3
88/170
85.3/129.33
* Note: On pusli 1151, no ignition of che stack'occur red and steam
interference prevented readings at the box/jamb interface.
L-52 j
)
-------
KIDC DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
SPARROWS POINT, MARYLAND
MONTHLY REPORT OF
SAMPLING AND TESTING PROGRAM ACTIVITIES
OCTOBER, 1991
GENERAL OVERVIEW
The performance demonstration of the Kress system was conducted during October.
This demonstration consisted of nine pushes per day between the hours of 11am.
and 7pm. These pushes were accepted by the Kress system in groups o£ three with
a three hour cooling time between each group. During the demonstration, visible
emission observations were made and three coke samples per day were obtained. In
addition, video recordings of both the conventional pushes and kress pushes were
made. Extended testing of the Kress system will cont inue through November. Other
activities related to the baseline sampling and analysis program continued in
October. Attachment 1 indicates the percent completion of the various aspects of
the baseline sampling and testing program through the end of October.
Project Team Meetings
A visit by a number of personnel from EPA was made on October 17 to observe the
Kress operation. On this day, one successful push was observed but because of
power supply problems the remainder of pushes scheduled for Kress were
cancelled. These problems were corrected and the Kress system resumed operation
on October 16. An audit of the sampling and testing program was conducted on
October 29 to 31 by EPA•s contractor from Research Triangle Institute. In
addition, the Kress box testing conducted by Keystone Environmental Resources
during this period was observed.
Demonstration Program
The Kress system accepted a total of 15^ pushes during the performance testing
from October 1 to 31. During this period, visible emission observations were
made and samples of the Kress coke were obtained. Video recordings of both the
Kress and conventional pushes were made during this period as well.. This testing
will continue through November.
QA/QC Activities
An audii of the testing program was conducted by EPA's contractor from Research
Triangle Institute on October 29 to 31. This audit consisted of an extensive
review the data base collected to date and observation of the methods used by
Bethlehem's contractor, BCM Inc., in making visible emission observations.
Although not anticipated at this time, changes in the existing procedures will
made as the findings of the audit require and as they are reported co us.
L—53-
-------
-2-
October, 1991
Monthly Report
COAL AND COKE QUALITY
Coke Screening
One sample of Kress coke was obtained for every set of three pushes taken by
Kress in October. These samples were in add i t ion to the conventional quenched
coke samples which continued to be collected. These samples are being screened
to evaluate the size differential between this coke and conventional quenched
coke. This information will be used to evaluate the impact on blast furnace
performance.
Drop Shatter Test
Drop Shatter Testing of Kress coke was conducted in October and will continue
through November.
Hampton Roads Testing Lab
Testing of Kress coke for coke reactivity index (CRI) and coke strength after
reaction (CSR t were conducted by Hampton Roads Testing Lab in October. This test
will continue through November. These data will be compared to the CRl/CSR data
for conventional quenched coke over the same period.
BLAST FURNACE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
No activities during the month.
DOOR EMISSIONS MONITORING
Collection of daily coke side and pusher side door emissions data are
cent inuing.
PUSHING EMISSION MONITORING
Visible emission observations of Kress pushes were performed five days per week,
by BCM, Inc. throughout October. In addition, observations of ten conventional
pushes per week continued in October. These observations will continue through
November.
QUENCH WATER MONITORING
Sampling of quench and makeup waters continued in October, A modification to the
CDS analytical procedure was initiated in October as recommended by Alliance
Corp. This change involves making the TDS determination at 103-105 C instead of
180 C as directed by the EPA method. This change should provide a better
estimate of particulate emissions when used with the emission formula developed
by Alliance Corp. Plans for obtaining water samples from the Kress cooling
system have been dropped from the program at EPA's request. This, is being done
so that efforts can be concentrated on other testing work which needs to be
completed before the batteries are idled. A sample of the makeup water to the
Kress cooling system was obtained, however, to ensure that this is essentially
the same as the conventional quench water makeup.
..Lr54
-------
-3-
October, 1991
Monthly Report
VIDEO TAPIMG
video taping of conventional and Kress pushes continued in October.
AREA MONITORING
Baseline samples for suspended particulate and benzene soluble matter in the
area of the coke door machine continued in October. In addition, samples were
obtained in October from the Kress carrier. This testing will continue through
November.
KRESS BOX VOC MEASUREMEMTS¦
Testing of che Kress boxes by Keystone Environmental Resources was conducted on
October 30 & 31. This testing was. performed to determine a number of volatile k
serai-volatile organics including polynuclaar aromatics, phenols, cresols, and
phthalates held within the box during the-cooling cycle. A report of the testing
results from Keystone is expected by the end of November or the beginning of
December.
KRESS BOX HEAT TRANSFER CALCULATIONS
Bethlehem's Research Group has agreed to assist in performing heat transfer
calculations from the Kress box. These calculations will be started in November.
Prepared by: A. G. Ossman
November 15, 1991
i
\
L-55 |
-------
November 18, 1991
KRESS TESTING - PERCENT COMPLETION OF BASELINE TEST PLftN THROUGH OCTOBER
No. of Samples No. of Samples
Completed Heeded
Coal Analyses 262 days 180 days
Coke Analyses 277 days 180 days
Hampton Roads 152 days 180 days
(CRI/CSRJ
Drop Shatter Test 28 40
VEO Pushing/'Travel 542 pushes 260
VEO Pushing 528 pushes 260
(from TS/PS)
Video Pushing/ 22 days 13
Travei/Di scharge¦
Door Emissions 180 180
Quench Water-TCLP 3 3
Makeup Water-TCLP 3 3
Quench Chera. Anal. 17 25
Makeup Cham. Anal. 16 25
Area Samples
GC, MS 1 6
GC/MS-QA 0 I
SP 53 50
BSO 4 6 50
SP/BSO-QA 4 5
Arab. Air 2 3
. L-56
Percent
Completion
>100% (continuing)
>100% (continuing)
84%
70%
>100% (continuing)
>100% (continuing)
>100% (continuing)
100% (continuing]
100%
100%
68%
64%
17%
0
>1001(cont inu ing)
92%
80%
6b*
-------
November 18, 1991
KRESS TESTING
PERCENT COMPLETION FOR DEMONSTRATION TEST PLAN
THROUGH OCTOBER
Coke Analyses
Hampton Roads
(CRI/CSR)
Drop Shatter Test
VEO Pushing/Travel
VEO Pushing
(from TS/PS)
VEO Cooling Cycle
VEO Kress Burner
Video Pushing/
Travel
No. of Samples
Completed
54
53
4Q
16
16
0
16
32
Video Cooling/Discharge 27
Video Burner
Door. Emissions
MaKeup Chem. Anal.
Area Samples
GC/MS
GC/MS-QA
SP
BSO
SP/BSO-QA
Kress Box Test
27
31
X
Q
0
5
5
0
1
No. o£ Samples
Needed
150
150
40
98 (days)
98 (daysJ
150 (days)
98 (days)
46 (pushes)
30
30
180
3
6
I
50
50
5
1
Percent
Complet ion
36%
35%
100%(cont inu ing)
16%
16%
0
16% •
70%
90%
90%
17%
a
0
0
10%
10%
0
100%
- L-57 1 !
-------
KIDC DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
SPARROWS POINT, MARYLAND
MONTHLY REPORT OF
SAMPLING AND TESTING PROGRAM ACTIVITIES
SEPTEMBER, 1991
GENERAL OVERVIEW
Activities related to the baseline sampling and analysis program Cor the Kress
demonstration continued in September. We continued preliminary visible emission
observations and video recordings of Kcess pushes to monitor the progress of the
Kress start-up operations. Kress coke samples were obtained to establish a
baseline before the start of the performance demonstration. The performance
demonstration is currently scheduled for the month of October. Attachment 1
indicates the percent completion of the various aspects of the baseline sampling
and testing, program through the end' of September.
Project Team Meeting
A meeting to discuss the sampling and analysis program requirements during the
Kress performance test was- held on September 24. It was agreed that that the
performance test would be seven days a week and would Initially consist of nine
pushes each day between 11am and 7pm. The nine pushes would be taken in groups
of three with a three hour cooling time between each group. It was stated,
however, that Kress should maximize efforts to achieve a 24 hour operation. It
was also agreed that Kress should take pushes with or without the Kress door
machine functioning..
Demonstration Program
The Kress system has accepted a total of 51 pushes through the end of September.
The demonstration test program started on October 1. Preliminary Kress data
continued to be obtained during September to monitor the start-up progress and
to gain experience with visible emission observations and video taping of the
Kress sy-item prior to the October demonstration.
QA/OC Activities
An update of water sample QA/QC results are provided in Attachment 2. These
data indicate good precision and accuracy by the Homer Research Laboratory.
QA/QC samples for area monitoring data are provided in Attachment 3.
! i
-------
-2-
September, 1991
Monthly Report
COAL AND COKE QUALITY
Coke Screening
Ihe automatic coke screening equipment was installed in September. Starting in
October one sample of Kress coke will be obtained Cor every set of three pushes
taken by Kress in addition to the conventional quenched coke sample. The
screening device will allow the laboratory personnel to conduct these additional
sample screenings required.
Drop Shatter Test
Drop Shatter Testing of Kress coke will be initiated in October.
Hampton Roads Testing Lab
The representativeness of Kress coke samples continues to be problem e
because of water spayed on the coke at the receiver station to reduce
temperature. During October, some Of the Kress coke will be cooled overnight to
ensure that it is cool enough not to activate the receiver station water sprays.
BLAST FUBNACE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
No activities during the month.
DOOR EMISSIONS MONITORING
Collection of daily coke side and pusher side door emissions data are
cont inuing.
PUSHING EMISSION MONITORING
Observation of baseline pushing emissions by BCM, Inc. continued in September.
Observation of Kress pushes initiated in August continued in September as well.
QUENCH WATER MONITORING
Sampling of quench and makeup waters continued in September. A second TCLP test
was performed on the quench and make-up waters in September. This test confirms
the earlier test result which indicated that the waters are not
characteristically hazardous. A modification to the TDS analytical procedure
will be initiated in. October as recommended by Alliance Corp. This change
involves making the TDS determination at 103-105 C instead of 105 C as directed
by the EPA method. This change should provide a better estimate of particulate
emissions when used with the emission formula developed by Alliance Corp. Plans
for obtaining water samples from the Kress cooling system have been dropped from
the program at EPA's request. This is being done so that efforts can be
concentrated on other testing work which needs to be completed before the
batteries are idled.
,L-59
-------
-3-
September, 1991
Monthly Report
VIDEO TAPING
Video taping of conventional and Kress pushes continued in September.
AREA MONITORING
Baseline samples for suspended particulate and benzene soluble natter in the
area of the coke door machine continued in September. Samples will be obtained
in October from the Kress carrier. Data from QA samples obtained are presented
in Attachment 3.
KRESS BOX VOC MEASUREMENTS.
A draft test protocol from Keystone Engineers has been reviewed by Bethlehem and
EPA. Keystone is currently revising the protocol to incorporate comments fro®
EPA and Bethlehem. This test work is currently scheduled for the end of October
or the first part of November.
Prepared! by: A. G. Ossman
October 11, 1991
¦- 1-60
-------
d'o-1
October 14, 1991
KRESS TESTING - PERCENT COMPLETION OF BASELINE TEST PLAN THROUGH SEPTEMBER
Coal Analyses
No. of Samples
Completed
261 days
No. of Samples
Needed
180 days
Percent
Complet ion
>100% (continuing)
Coke Analyses
Hampton Roads
(CRI/CSR)
Drop Shatter Test
VEO Pushing/Travel
VEO Pushing
(Erom TS/PS)
Video Pushing/
Travel/Discharge
Door Emissions-
Quench Water-TCLP
Makeup Water-TCLP
Quench Chem. Anal.
Makeup Chem. Anal.
Area Samples
GC/MS
GC/MS-QA
SP
BSO
SP/BSO-QA
Amb. Air
249 days
152 days
10
530 pushes
421 pushes
IS days
180
2
2
13
13
0
0
48
29
4
2
180 days
ISO days
40
260
260
13
180
3
3
25
25
50
50
5
3
>100% (continuing)
84%
25%
>100% (continuing)
>100% (continuing)
>100% (continuing)
100% (continuing)
66%
66%
52%
52%
0
0
96%
58%
30%
66%
L-61. i
-------
-2-
October 14, 1991
KRESS TESTING - PERCENT COMPLETION FOR DEMONSTRATION TEST PLAH
THROUGH SEPTEMBER
Coke Analyses
Hampton Roads
(CRI/CSR)
Drop Shatter Test
VEO Pushing/Travel
VEO Pushing
(from TS/PS)
VEO Cooling Cycle
VEO Kress Burner
Video Pushing/
Travel
Mo. of Samples
Completed
9
8
0
1
1
0
1
20
Video Cooling/Discharge 15
video Burner
Door Emissions
Makeup Chem. Anal.
Area Samples
GC/MS
GC/MS-QA
SP
BSD
SP/BSO-QA
Unflared Box
(End of push)
Unflared Box
(after cooling)
15
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
No. of Samples
Needed
150
150
40
98 (days)
98 (days)
150 (days)
98 (days)
45 (pushes)
30
30
180
3
6
1
50
50
5
2
Percent
Complet ion
6%
5%
0
II
1%
0
11
43%
50%
50%
8%
0
L-62 .
-------
No'
BETHLEHEM STEEL
Bethlehem, PA
INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
Research Department
Planning, Administration and
Technical Services
September 24, 1991
Ref:
1307
From: J. Y. Liu
To:
A. G. Gssman
Subject: KRESS PROJECT WATER SAMPLES FROM SPARROWS POINT
Reference: Project Plan for Kress Indirect Dry Cooling System, Jan. 10,1991
As requested, we have been analyzing the Kress Project water samples taken from the
Sparrows Point Coke Batteries 11 and 12 since March 1991. We follow EPA methods for
these analyses except for the Chloride determinations for which we use the Volhard titrimetric
method. As part of our quality assurance program and the project plan (Ref), we periodically
perform duplicate determinations and spike samples to check the precision and accuracy of
our results. Our most recent data are shown on the following pages. The concentration of
each determination, the agreement between the samples and the duplicates along with the
spike values and the % recoveries are reported. As you can see, the agreement between the
original samples and the duplicates are between 97% and 108% which are within the EPA
expectation of 90% and 110%. The spike recoveries are above 86% which are much better
than the EPA-accepted value, of 75%. Some analytes such as TDS, TSS, and oil/grease are
not appropriate to spike.
We have been discussing with you the possibility of having the EPA audit our laboratory. If
possible, please make the necessary contacts and then advise us who to contact to discuss
details of the audit. If you have any questions, contact me at x31 18.
J. Y. Uu
cc: WJRiley
LMStuart
PGCheplick
DAFLinchbaugh
" 1
L-63 ;
-------
SPARROWS POINT COKE BATTERIES 11 & 12 MAKE-UP WATER AND SPIKES
Make-up
Sampling Make-up Water Spiked
Date Water Spiked Value Recovery
CN, ppm
8-29-91
0.03
0.23
0.20
100
Hg, ppb
7-25-91
<5
9.3
10
93
Na, ppm
8-29-91
77
113
40
90
As, ppm
7-25-91
<0.02
0.096
0.10
96
Pb, ppm
7-25-91
<0.2
1.0
1.0
100
Ca, ppm
7-25-91
25
43
20
90
Hardness, ppm
7-25-91
134
188
50
108
TSS, ppm
7-25-91
7
NA
NA
NA
TDS, ppm
7-25-91
454
NA
NA
NA
S04, ppm
8-29-91
76
167
100
91
CI, ppm
8-29-91
92
135
50
86
Oil/Grease, ppm
7-25-91
14
NA
NA
NA
NH3-N, ppm
7-25-91
<1
10
10.6
92
Phenol, ppm
7-25-91
<0.05
0.39
0.40
97
NA: Sample is not spiked.
I *\
; L-64
-------
SPARROWS POINT COKE BATTERIES 11 & 12 QUENCH WATER
Sampling Date
CN, ppm
8-29-91
Hg,ppb
7-25-91
Na, ppm
7-25-91
As, ppm
7-25-91
Pfc>, ppm
7-25-91
Ca, ppm
7-25-91
Hardness, ppm
7-25-91
TSS, ppm
7-25-91
TDS, ppm
7-25-91
S04, ppm
7-25-91
CI, ppm
7-25-91
Oil/Grease, ppm
9-10-91
NH3-N, ppm
7-25-91
Phenol, ppm
7-25-91
* Agreement = (Duplicate / Original) x 100%
Original Duplicate Agreement*
%
0.12 0.13 108
<5 <5 100
124 123 99
0.07 0.07 100
<0.2 <0.2 100
62 60 97
269 269 100
560 590 105
793 805 101
172 176 102
189 186 98
<5 <5 100
1 <1 98
0.64? 0.68 106
L-65
-------
October 11, 1991
ATTACHMENT NO¦ 3
KRESS PROJECT COKE OVEN AREA SAMPLS QA
DATE TOTAL PARTICULATE MATTER
(MG/M3)
5/13/91 13.90
5/13/91 8.22
BENZENE SOLUBLE ORGAHICS
(MG/M3)
5. 44
5. 00
7/31/91
7/31/91.
22.35
16.66
1.10
0.84
8/01/91
8/01/91
7.64
3.76.
1.28
1.67
9/13/91.
9/13/91
5 .68
3. 2 3
N. A.
N. A.
N.A.- Not available at the present time. Waiting on results from the lab.
L-66
-------
KIDC DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
SPARROWS POINT, MARYLAND
MONTHLY REPORT OF
SAMPLING AND TESTING PROGRAM ACTIVITIES
AUGUST, 1991
GENERAL OVERVIEW
Activities related to the baseline sampling and analysis program for the Kress
demonstration continued in August. We continued preliminary visible emission
observations and video recordings of Kress pushes to monitor the progress of the
Kress start-up operations. Kress coke samples were obtained to establish a
baseline before the start oE the performance demonstration. The performance
demonstration is currently scheduled tor the month of October. Attachment 1
indicates the percent completion of the various aspects of the baseline sampling
and testing, program througn the end of August.
Project Team Meeting
A.pre-audit survey by EPA and their contractor from Research Triangle Institute
was held on August 12 - 14. During this visit, QA/QC procedures and sampling
methods were reviewed. EPA recommended during the visit that their consultant
from Alliance Corp visit Sparrows Point to observe the quench cower design and
operation to develop an estimate of quench tower emissions. Bethlehem agreed and
Alliance Corp's J. Jeffery visited Sparrows Point on August 29. as a'result of
this visit, the quench water sampling location was changed. J. Jeffery will
issue a letter report of his observations with his suggested empirical
correlations- for estimating the quench tower particulate emissions. The
correlation will be based on TDS concentration of the quench water used.
Demonstration Program
The Kress system has accepted a total of 33 pushes through the end of August.
The demonstration tesc program is currently scheduled to start in October.
Preliminary data will be obtained prior to the demonstration to monitor the
start-up progress and to gain experience with visible emission observations and
video tapping of the Kress system prior to the October demonstration.
QA/QC Activities
QA/QC results for water samples obtained during July are provided in Attachment
2. These data indicate good precision and accuracy by the Homer Research
Laboratory. Other QA/QC samples for area monitoring and visible emission
monitoring are planned for September. Bethlehem's corporate QA department has
agreed to take a lead role in the performance of audits for contracted services
related to this project. A meeting was held between the 'sampling and testing
manager and the plant QA department to discuss the development.of audit
checklists. These checklists are currently being developed.
-------
-2-
August, 1991
Monthly Report
COAL AND COKE QUALITY
Coke Screening
The automatic coke screening equipment has been delivered, installation by
plant personnel will occur in September. It is hoped that this installation can
be completed before the start of the performance test program in October. The
screening device will allow the laboratory personnel to conduct the extra number
of sample screenings required by the KIDC test plans. It will also provide more
consistent screening procedures than the manual screening method now being used.
Until this equipment is received and installed/ the laboratory will use overtime
to process the additional number of samples.
Drop Shatter Test
Drop Shatter Testing of Kress coke will be initiated in September. This testing
is planned over a 20 week period.
Hampton Roads Testing Lab
Preliminary testing of Kress coke samples for CSR and CHI was initiated in
August to monitor the start-up progress of the Kress process. The
representativeness of these samples is questionable because of water spayed on
the coke at the receiver station to reduce temperature. Methods will be used, on
future samples to obtain truly dry quenched coke samples.
BLAST FURNACE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
No activities during the month.
DOOR EMISSIONS MONITORING
Collection of daily coke side and pusher side door emissions data are
continuing. Multiple readings of doors for QA/QC were obtained in August to
evaluate Che accuracy and- precision of the data being collected.
POSHING EMISSION MONITORING
Observation of baseline pushing emissions by BCM, Inc. continued in August.
Observations are currently scheduled for two days each week for 10 pushes each
day. Observation of Kress pushes was also initiated in August in preparation for
the performance demonstration.
QUENCH WATER MONITORING
Sampling of quench and makeup waters continued in August. The sampling location
for quench water was changed at the end of the month as recommended by EPA's
consultant from Alliance Corp. This new sampling location should provide a
better estimate of TDS in the quench water which will be used in developing an
estimate for particulate emissions. Results of TCLP analysis of quench and
makeup waters obtained in July indicate that the water is not hazardous. A
second TCLP test is planned for September.
L-68
-------
-3-
August, 1991
Monthly Report
VIDEO TAPING
Video taping of conventional pushes on 11 & 12 batteries continued in August.
Videos are currently being taken, once per week from two angles simultaneously.
This program will continue for the next several months. Additional videos of
pushes with the kress system have been initiated as well to monitor the start-up
progress.
Baseline samples for suspended particulate and benzene soluble matter in the
area of the coke door machine continued in August. Additional samples will be
obtained in the near future for volatiles and semi-volatiles as well as a number
of quality assurance samples and background ambient air samples.
A field survey with Keystone Environmental Resources, Inc. was conducted in
August so that a testing protocol can be developed to perform this work. We
have received a recommended test protocol from Keystone and will forward it to
EPA for their comments, and approval.
AKEA MONITORING
KRESS BOX VQC MEASUREMENTS.
Prepared by: A. G. Ossjnan
September 13, 1991
L-69
-------
September 9, 1991
ATTACHMENT 1
KRESS TESTING - PERCENT COMPLETION OF BASELINE TEST PLAN THROUGH AUGUST
Coal Analyses
No. of Samples
Completed
241 days
No. of Samples
Needed-
180 days
Coke Analyses
Hampton Roads.
(CRI/CSR)
Drop shatter Test
VEO Pushing/Travel
VEO Pushing
(from TS/PS)
Video Pushing/
Travel/Discharge
Door Emissions
Quench Water-TCLP
Makeup Water-TCLP
Quench Chem. Anal.
Makeup Chem. Anal.
A tea Samples
GC/MS
GC/MS-QA
SP
BSD
SP/BSO-QA
Amb. Air
2 46 days
154 days
6
390 pushes
380 pushes
16 days
180
1
1
12
12
0
o
36
29
0
2
180 days
180 days
40
260
260
13
180
3
3
25
25
6
1
50
50
5
3
\
L-7,0
Percent
Completion
>100% (continuing)
>100% (continuing)
86%
15%
>100% (continuing)
>100% (continuing)
>100% (continuing)
100% (continuing)
33%
3 3%
48%
4S%
0
0
72%
58%
0
66%
-------
kress/M
09/13/91 12:01
Ali(\thmesrf X
Sparrows Point Coke Bit t er1 as 1 l&l 2 Quench and Make-up Watur
Submitted Date s 7/26/91 Reported Date i 8/16/91
Sample ID
CM Hq Na As Pb Ca Hardness T5S TDS S04
ppm pph ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm
Quench water 0. 12 <5 124 0.07 <.2 62 269 560 793 172
quench water 0.10 <5 123 0.07 <. 2 60 269 S90 S05 176
dup11 cats
make-up water <.02 <5 72 <0.02 <. 2 25 134 7 454 81
* make-up water <.02 9.3 101 0:096 1.0 43 166 NA NA 551
splked
F4 , fipl ke value NA 10 40 0. 10 1.0 20 50 NA NA 500
-J !
HK! ;
recovery % NA 93 73 66 100 90 108 NA NA 102
«*NAj sample 1s not spiked
-------
kr ess/
~9/13
Sample ID
quench water
quench water
duplicate
mak«-up water
make-up water
I ~~"i spiked
!
•' spike va lue
¦i
j«V recovery %
¦sj
fo
~*NA; sample 1s not spiked
CI 0/6 NHJ-N Phanol
ppm ppm ppm ppm
16& 20 1 0.64
166 25 <1 0.68
94 14 <1 < .05
138 NA 10 0.30
50 NA 10.6 0.4
98 NA 82 96
-------
KIDC DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
SPARROWS POINT, MARYLAND
MONTHLY REPORT OF
SAMPLING AND TESTING PROGRAM ACTIVITIES
JULY, 1991
GENERAL OVERVIEW
Activities related to the baseline sampling and analysis program for the Kress
demonstration continued in July. In addition, we initiated preliminary visible
emission observations and video recordings of Kress pushes to monitor the
progress of the Kress start-up operations. Collection of Kress coke is planned
for mid-August to establish a baseline before the start of the performance
demonstration currently scheduled for September. Observation and video recording
of baseline pushing emissions also continued. The quench water sampling program
was restarted- in July.
Project Team Meeting
A pre-audit survey by EPA and their contractor from Research Triangle Institute
has been scheduled for August 12 - 14. The purpose of. this visit is to review
QA/QC procedures and sampling methods prior to the demonstration test program.
Demonstration Program
The Kress system has accepted a. total of 17 pushes through the end. of July. The
demonstration test program is currently scheduled to start in September.
Preliminary data will be obtained prior to the demonstration to monitor the
start-up progress and to gain experience with visible emission observations and
video tapping of the Kress system prior to the September demonstration.
QA/QC Activities
A meeting was held between the QA manager and the Sampling and Testing manager
to identify actions needed to update the OA and QC aspects of the testing
program. As a result of this meeting, a number of Quality Control Procedures and
quality system audit checklists are being developed. In addition, arrangements
are being made to audit outside laboratories involved in the testing program.
Additional quench water samples needed to perform spiked samples and multiple
runs on the same sample were obtained during the month to evaluate the accuracy
and precision of the analytical test methods being used by the Homer Research
Lab Chemical Analysis laboratory. Other QA/QC samples for area monitoring and
visible emission monitoring are planned for August.
i
i f 3-73 !
-------
-2-
July, 1991
Monthly Report
COAL AMD COKE QUALITY
Coke Screening
The automatic coke sample screening equipment should be delivered in August. It
will require installation by plant personnel. It is hoped that this installation
can be completed before the start of the performance test program in September.
The screening device will allow the laboratory personnel to conduct the extra
number of sample screenings required by the KIDC test plans. It will also
provide more consistent screening procedures than the manual screening method
now being used. Until this equipment is received and installed, the laboratory
will use overtime to process the additional number of samples.
Drop Shatter Test
Drop Shatter Testing of baseline coke samples continued during the month. This
testing will continue for a total of approximately 20 weeks. Additional testing
of Kress coke will be initiated as soon as samples of the Kress coke are
obtained. This testing is also planned over a 20 week period.
Hampton Roads Testing Lab
Testing of conventional coke for Coke Strength Reaction and Coke Reactivity
Index by the Hampton Roads Testing Laboratory was temporarily stopped in early
July because of delays in the start of steady operation of the Kress system.
Testing of preliminary Kress coke samples for CSR and CRI will be initiated in
August to monitor the start-up progress, of the Kress process.
BLAST FURNACE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
No activities during the month.
DOOR EMISSIONS MONITORING
Collection of daily coke side and pusher side door emissions data are
continuing. BCM Inc., is collecting these data. We plan to begin entering all
of these data into a- computer data base. Multiple readings of doors for QA/QC
are planned for August to evaluate the accuracy and precision of the data being
collected.
PUSHING EMISSION MONITORING
Observation of baseline pushing emissions by BCM, Inc. continued in July.
Observations are currently scheduled for two days each week for 10 pushes each
day.
QUENCH WATER MONITORING
Sampling of quench and makeup waters was restarted in July. Additional samples
were also obtained so that spiked samples and multiple runs on the same sample
can be made for QA/QC. Samples were also obtained for TCLP analysis in July.
r'
L-74,
-------
-3-
July, 1991
Monthly Report
VIDEO TAPING
Video taping of conventional pushes on 11 S> 12 batteries continued in July.
Videos ace currently being taken once per week from two angles simultaneously.
This program will continue for the next several months. Additional videos o£
pushes with the kress system have been initiated as well to monitor the start-up
progress.
AREA MONITORING
Baseline samples for suspended particulate and benzene soluble matter in the
area of the coke door machine continued in July. Additional samples will be
obtained in the near future for volatilea and semi-volatiles as well as a number
of quality assurance samples and background ambient air samples. Additional
personal sampling pumps and a calibrator to handle the increased number of
samples during the demonstration test program was received1 in July.
KRESS BOX VOC MEASUREMENTS.
No activities during the month.
Prepared by: A. G. Ossman
August 9, 1991
L-7-5
-------
KIDC DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
SPARROWS POINT, MARYLAND
MONTHLY REPORT OF
SAMPLING AND TESTING PROGRAM ACTIVITIES
JUNE, 1991
GENERAL OVERVIEW
Activities related to the baseline sampling and analysis program Cor the Kress
demonstration continued in June. Collection of baseline data from 11 & 12
batteries relating to coal and coke properties continued. Observation and video
recording of baseline pushing emissions also continued. The quench water
sampling program was temporarily stopped in June because of a backlog at the
Homer Research laboratory. It is anticipated that this sampling will start again
in mid-July. The data base of the baseline data being collected continues to be
updated.
Project Team Meeting
Members, of the project team met with EPA on June 13 & 14 to review- data
collection procedures and to review the QA/QC plan for the program.
Demonstration Program
The Kress system accepted 6 pushes through the end of June. Collection of data
for the demonstration test program will begin once the system becomes fully
operational. Spot checks of coke quality and emission readings from the system
may be obtained on a periodic basis to monitor the start-up progress.
QA/QC Activities
It is anticipated that audits of the analytical and testing laboratories by BSC
and EPA will be scheduled at the start of the demonstration test program and
again halfway through the program.
COAL AND COKE QUALITY
Coke Screening
The Sparrows Point Plant Laboratory has initiated the purchase of automatic coke
sample screening equipment which will allow the laboratory personnel to conduct
the extra number of sample screenings required by the KIDC test plans. It will,
also provide more consistent screening procedures than the manual screening
method now being used. Until this equipment is received and installed, the
laboratory will use overtime to process the additional number of samples.
Delivery of this equipment is expected in early August.
-------
-2-
June, 1991
Monthly Report
Drop Shatter Test
Drop Shatter Testing of baseline coke sample* continued during the month. This
testing will continue for approximately 20 weeks. Additional testing o£ Kress
coke will be initiated as soon as steady operation of the Kress system is
attained. This testing is also planned over a 20 week period.
Hampton Roads Testing Lab
Testing of conventional coke for Coke Strength Reaction and Coke Reactivity
Index by the Hampton Roads Testing Laboratory continued in June. This testing
was temporarily stopped at the end of the month, however, because of delays in
the start of steady operation of the Kress system. This testing will continue
once steady operation of the Kress system is attained.
BLAST FURNACE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
No activities during the month.
DOOR EMISSIONS MONITORING
Collection of daily coke side and pusher side door emissions data are
continuing. BCM Inc., is collecting these data. We plan to begin entering all
of these data into a computer data base.
PUSHING EMISSION MONITORING
Observation of baseline pushing emissions by BCM, Inc. continued' in June.
Observations are currently scheduled for two days each week for 10 pushes each
day.
QUENCH MATER MONITORING
Sampling of quench and makeup waters was stopped in June because of a backlog at
the Homer Research laboratory. Sampling is expected to start again in mid-July.
Sampling and analysis for TCLP constituents is also planned for July.
VIDEO TAPING
Video taping of pushes on 11 & 12 batteries continued in June. Videos are
currently being taken once per week from two angles simultaneously. This
program will continue for the next several months.
AREA MONITORING
Baseline samples for suspended particulate and benzene soluble matter in the
area of the coke door machine continued in June. Additional samples will be
obtained in the near future for volatiles and semi-volat iles as well as a number
of quality assurance samples and background ambient air samples. A purchase
order has been issued for additional personal sampling pumps and a calibrator to
handle the increased number of samples during the demonstration test program.
Delivery of this equipment is expected in early July.
KRESS BOX VOC MEASUREMENTS.
No activities during the month.
Prepared by: ft. G. Ossman [ • L-77-
July 5, 1991 ; C. , '
-------
KIDC DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
SPARROWS POINT, MARYLAND
MONTHLY REPORT OF
SAMPLING AND TESTING PROGRAM ACTIVITIES
MAY, 1991
GENERAL OVERVIEW
Activities related to the baseline sampling and analysis program for the Kress
demonstration continued in May. Collection of baseline data fro® 11 & 12
batteries relating to coal and coke properties continued. Observation and video
recording of baseline pushing emissions also continued along with the quench
water sampling program during the month. All the baseline data collected is
being entered into a data base for comparison with data to be collected during
the Kress demonstration.
Proiect Team Meeting
A project team meeting was held on April 29 to review activities, data
collection, and schedules related to the test program. Minutes of this meeting
were issued. The next project team meeting will be scheduled as needed-.
Demonstration Proqram
Delays, in the start-up of the Kress system, relating to the construction of the
Kress carrier have delayed the start of the Demonstration Test Plan. Current
schedules indicate that start-up of the Kress system should occur in mid-June.
Initiation of the Demonstration Test Plan is planned to coincide with, this
start-up.
SPA Review of Test Program Reports
A response to EPA's comments- on the Baseline, Demonstration and Quality
Assurance Test reports has been completed and has been sent to EPA. A visit to
Sparrows Point by EPA is scheduled £or June 13 & 14 so that they can observe and
discuss data collection procedures.
COAL AND COKE QUALITY
Coke Screening
The Sparrows Point Plant Laboratory has initiated the purchase of automatic coke
sample screening equipment which will allow the laboratory personnel to conduct
the extra number of sample screenings required by the KIDC test plans. It will
also provide more consistent screening procedures than the manual screening
method now being used. Until this equipment is received and installed, the
laooratory will use overtime to process the additional number of samples.
Delivery of this equipment is expected in early August.
Lr7.8
-------
-2-
Hay, 1991
Monthly Report
Drop Shatter Test
Drop Shatter Testing of baseline coke samples was initiated during the month.
This testing will continue for approximately 20 weeks. Additional testing of
Kress coke will be initiated as soon as steady operation of Kress system is
attained. This testing is also planned over a 20 week period.
Hampton Roads Testing Lab
Testing of conventional coke for Coke Strength Reaction and Coke Reactivity
Index by the Hampton Roads Testing Laboratory continued in May.
BLAST FURNACE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Ho activities during the month.
POOR EMISSIONS MONITORING
Collection of daily coke side and pusher side door emissions data are
continuing. BCM Inc., is collecting these data. We plan to begin entering all
of these data into a computer data base.
PUSHING EMISSION MONITORING
Observation of baseline pushing emissions by BCM, Inc. continued in May.
Observations are currently scheduled for two days each week for 10 pushes each
day.
QUENCH WATER MONITORING
Sampling of quench and makeup waters continued in May. Samples are currently
being collected once per week. This program will continue for the next several
months. We are currently investigating other labs to perform the required
analyses because of a backlog at the Homer Research laboratory.
VIDEO TAPING
Video taping of pushes on 11 & 12 batteries continued in May. Videos are
currently being taken once- per week from two angles simultaneously. This
program will continue for the next several months.
AREA MONITORING
Baseline samples for suspended particulate and benzene soluble matter in the
area of the coke door machine continued in May. Additional samples will be
obtained in the near future for volatiles and semi-volatiles as well as a number
of quality assurance samples and background ambient air samples. He are
currently investigating the purchase of additional personal sampling pumps and a
calibrator to handle the increased number of samples which will need to be
obtained when the Kress system starts up.
KRESS BOX VOC MEASUREMENTS.
No activities during the month.
Prepared by: A. G. Ossman
June 7, 1991,
y L-79
-------
KIDC DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
SPARROWS POINT, MARYLAND
MONTHLY REPORT OF
SAMPLING AMD TESTING PROGRAM ACTIVITIES
APRIL, 1991
GENERAL OVERVIEW
Activities related to the baseline sampling and analysis program for the Kress
demonstration continued in April. Collection of baseline data from 11 & 12
batteries relating to coal and coke properties continued. Observation and video
recording o£ baseline pushing emissions also continued along with the quench
water sampling program during the month. All the baseline data collected is
being, entered into a data base for comparison with data to be collected during
the Kress demonstration.
Project Team Meeting. A project team meeting was held on April 29 to review
activities/ data collection, and schedules related to the test program. Minutes
of this meeting have been issued. The next project team meeting will be
scheduled, as needed.
Demonstration Program. Delays in the start-up of the Kress system relating to
the construction of the Kress carrier have delayed the start of the
Demonstration Test Plan. Current schedules indicate that start-up of the Kress
system should occur in May. Initiation of the Demonstration Test Plan is. planned
to coincide with this start-up.
EPA Review of Test Program Reports. A response to EPA's comments on the
Baseline, Demonstration and Quality Assurance Test reports has been completed -
arid has been sent to EPA. A visit to Sparrows Point by EPA is scheduled for June
13 & 14 so that they can observe and discuss data collection procedures.
COAL AMD COKE QUALITY
Coke Screening. The Sparrows Point Plant Laboratory has initiated the purchase
of automatic coke sample screening equipment which will allow the laboratory
personnel to conduct the extra number of sample screenings required by the KIDC
test plans. It will also provide move consistent screening procedures than the
manual screening method now being used. Until this equipment is received and
installed, the laboratory will use overtime to process the additional number of
samples.
Drop shatter Test Equipment¦ Drop Shatter Test equipment which was constructed
by BSC'S Research Dept. has been, tested and delivered to Sparrows Point.
Training of Sparrows Point personnel will be performed in early May and
initiation of baseline Drop Shatter Tests should begin soon after.
Hampton Roads Testing Lab. Testing of conventional coke for Coke Strength
Reaction and Coke Reactivity Index by the Hampton Roads Testing Laboratory
continued in April.
L-80 -'J
-------
-2-
Apr11, 1991
Monthly Report
BLAST FURNACE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION.
No activities during the month.
DOOR EMISSIONS MONITORING
Collection of daily coke side and pusher side door emissions data are
continuing. BCM Inc., is collecting these data. We plan to begin entering all
of these data into a computer data base.
PUSHING EMISSION MONITORING
Observation of baseline pushing emissions by BCM, Inc. continued in April.
Observations are currently scheduled for two days each week for 10 pushes each
day.
QUENCH WATER MONITORING
Sampling o£ quench and makeup waters continued in April. Samples are currently
being collected once per week. This program will continue for the next several
months.
VIDEO TAPING
Video taping of pushes or, 11 & 12 batteries continued in April. Videos are
currently being taken once per week from two angles simultaneously. This
program will continue for the next several months.
AREA MONITORING
Baseline samples for suspended particulate and benzene soluble matter in the
area of the coke door machine was initiated in April. Additional samples will be
obtained in the near future for volatiles and s«mi-volat ilea as well as a number
of quality assurance samples and background ambient air samples.
KRESS BOX VOC MEASUREMENTS.
No activities during the month.
Prepared by: A. G. Ossman
May ID, 1991
L-81
-------
KIDC DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
BETHLEHH4 STEEL CORPORATION
SPARROWS POINT, MARYLAND
MONTHLY REPORT OF
SAMPLING AND TESTING PROGRAM ACTIVITIES
MARCH, 1991
GENERAL OVERVIEW
Activities related, to the baseline sampling, and analysis program for the Kress
demonstration continued i_n March. Collection of baseline data from 11 & 12
batteries relating to coal and coke properties continued. Observation and video
recording ofi baseline pushing amissions was initiated. The quench water sampling
program was. also initiated during the month. All the baseline data collected is
being entered into a data base for comparison with data to be collected during
the Kress demonstration.
Project Team Meeting. A project team meeting will be scheduled, for the end of
April to review activities> data collection, and schedules related to the test
program.
Demonstration Program. Delays in the start-up of the Kress system relating to
the construction of the Kress carrier have delayed the start of the
Demonstration Test Plan. Current schedules indicate that start-up of the Kress
system should occur in mid-May. Initiation of the Demonstration Test Plan is
planned to coincide with this, start-up.
EPA Review of Test Program Reports. A response to SPA's comments on the
Baseline, Demonstration and Quality Assurance Test reports has been completed
and will be sent to EPA..
COAL AND COKE QUALITY
Coke Screening. The Sparrows Point Plant Laboratory has initiated the purchase
of automatic coke sample screening equipment which will allow the Laboratory
personnel to conduct the extra number of sample screenings required by the KIDC
test plans. It will also provide more consistent screening, procedures than the
manual screening method now being used.
Drop Shatter Test Equipment. Drop Shatter Test equipment which was constructed
by BSC'S Research Dept. has been tested and delivered to Sparrows Point.
Initiation of baseline Drop Shatter Tests should begin in mid-April.
Hampton Roads Testing Lab. Testing of conventional coke for Coke Strength
Reaction and Coke Reactivity Index by the Hampton Roads Testing Laboratory was
initiated in March.
BLAST FURNACE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION.
No activities during the month.
L-8'2 I
-------
-2-
March, 1991
Monthly Report
DOOR EMISSIONS MONITORING
Collection of daily coke side and pusher side door emissions data are
continuing. BCM Inc., is collecting these data. He plan to begin entering all
of these data into a computer data base.
PUSHING EMISSION MONITORING
Observation of baseline pushing emissions by BQ1, Inc. was initiated in March.
Observations are currently scheduled for two days each week for 10 pushes each
day.
0UENC3 WATER MONITORING
Sampling of quench and makeup-waters was initiated in March. Samples ara
currently being collected once per week. This program will continue for the next
several months.
VIDEO TAPING
video taping of pushes on 11 s> 12 batteries was initiated in March. Videos are
currently being taken once per week from two angles simultaneously. This
program will continue for the next several months.
AREA MONITORING
We- expect to begin collecting baseline samples for suspended particulate and
benzene soluble matter in Che area of the coke door machine in April.
KRESS BOX VOC MEASUREMENTS.
No activities during the month.
Prepared by: A. G. Ossman
April 11, 1991
[ .L-83
-------
KIDC DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
SPARROWS POINT, MARYLAND
MONTHLY REPORT OF
¦ SAMPLING AND TESTING PROGRAM ACTIVITIES
FEBRUARY, 1991
GENERAL OVERVIEW
During the month of February a number of activities were initiated or completed
to begin the collection of the information required by the Baseline and
Demonstration Test Programs. These are discussed in the following paragraphs.
Project Team Meeting. On February 6, 1991 a meeting was held at Sparrows Point
of the Sampling and Tasting project team to review the overall test programs
required, the test program schedules and personnel responsibilities. Several
followup actions were initiated as a result of this meeting.
Demonstration Program Delay. There has been an extended delay in the startup of
the-KIDC demonstration, project due to a number of factors relating to the
construction of the KRESS Carrier. This delay has delayed, the start of the
Demonstration Test Plan. However, we have begun collecting information related
to the Baseline Test Plan and have initiated training and practice programs for
several activities which will be helpful during the conduct of the Test Plans.
Revised test program schedules will be dveloped as soon as a new
contruction/startup schedule-has been established.
EPA Review of Test Program Reports. We have received EPA's comments on our
Baseline, Demonstration and Quality Assurance Test reports and have begun
preparing a response. In general, EPA's comments do not appear to be sufficient
to delay the test program activities. He expect to have a response to EPA's
comments, completed by the end of March.
DATA MANAGER
We have retained the services of J. W. Pasquali for the Data Manager position
and he has begun collecting and computer entry of several of the Baseline Data
for coal and conventional coke quality, coke battery operating, conditions.
COAL AND COKE QUALITY
Coke Screening. The Sparrows Point Plant Laboratory has initiated the purchase
of a automatic coke sample screening equipment which will allow the Laboratory
personnel to conduct the extra number of sample screenings required by the KIDC
test plans. It will also provide more consistent screening procedures than the
manual screening method now being used.
Drop Shatter Test Equipment. BSC'S Research Dept. has completed the
. construction of the Drop Shatter Test Equipment. This equipment will be shipped
to Sparrows Point for installation at the Sparrows point Laboratory in March.
I L-84
-------
-2-
February, 1991
Monthly Report
Hampton Roads Testing Lab. We have retained tha Hampton Roads Testing
Laboratory to conduct the Coke Strength Reaction tests required of both
conventional and KIDC coke.
BLAST FURNACE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION.
Ho activities during the month.
DOOR EMISSIONS MONITORING
Collection of daily coke side and pusher side door emissions data are
continuing. 'BCM Inc., is collecting these data. He plan to begin entering all
of these data into a computer data base.
Ho activities during the month. We expect to begin collecting Baseline Pushing
Emissions observations in March.
QUENCH WATER MONITORING
No activities during the month.
VIDEO TAPING.
Two video cameras and tripods have been purchased and a few practice video
taping trials have.been conducted at Sparrows Point inorder to. locate the best
positions for filming.
No activities during the month. Me expect to begin collecting baseline samples
for suspended particulate and benzene soluble matter in April.
KRESS BOX VOC MEASUREMENTS.
No activities during the month.
Prepared by: L. M. Stuart
March 13, 1991
PUSHING EMISSION MONITORING
AREA MONITORING
I
L-S5
-------
Section 4
Observe! Method 9 Certifications
(.
-------
c
i
Oo
fesra (ttmromtmttj (Enllwje
an
award of completion
to
FRANK R . CflMPEGGI
For Completion of the Continuing Education Course
VISIBLE EMISSIONS KVIVI.nATTON TRAINING AND TESTING
Inclusive Dates of the Course —
Continuing Education Units Awarded
May 20. 21, fi 22, 1991
2.5
Donald J, Slowinski, President
Hay 23, 1991
Date
Andrew J. Snope, Dean of Instruction
-------
F'.
r*
i
oo
-.00
fern* Gkmtmmtity QtaUfg?
presents an
award of completion
to
RONALD J - ABBAMOWSKI
For Completion of the Continuing Education Course
VTSIBI.E EMISSIONS EVALUATION TRAINING AND TESTING
. . . _ , , „ Hay 20, 2|, & 22, 1991
Inclusive Pates of the Course
2.5
Continuing Education Units Awarded
M.'iy 23, 1991
iDonanl J. Slowinski, President
Date Andrew J. Snope, Dean of Instruction [
t
-------
Easra (Eummmttty
presents an
award of completion
to
r1 -
i
oo
:
I
EUGENE P - HARD
For Completion of the Continuing Education Course
VISIBLE EMISSIONS EVALUATION TRAINING AND TESTING
•j V; v"
.L.l. .
''i ••
': . :' '
May 23, 1991
Inclusive Dates of the Course
Continuing Education Units Awarded
May 20, 21, & 22, 1991
2.5
Donald J. Slowinski, President
Date
Andrew J. Snope, Dean of Instruction
-------
(Emmmttutu (Mlwje
presents an
award of completion
to
« r4
i
-------
£fflummmtttfj
presents an
award of completion
to
RICHARp E T ABRAMOWSKX
•tT'
For Completion of the Continuing Education Course
'! -v
"\--J f ;v-?-
"¦ « !'"• " '
,>¦: >¦ V-" ,
VISIBLE EMISSIONS EVALUATION THATNTNG AND TESTING
f V '
Inclusive Dates of the Course
Continuing Education Units Awarded
Nay 20, 21, & 22, 1991
V V; V..Vv I' ' I.' ¦-
•• • v-,,\ { y-- •
f i a w ii r.';• . >
' -\ - ¦
Vt-
Hay 23, 1991
n 11 ry
Donaid J. Slowinski, President
-I .^noFiP Dpan of Instriirtiori
-------
Section 5
American Medical Laboratory Quality Assurance
-------
AML
KJ industrial hygiene laboratory 9
A DIVISION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL LABORATORIES. INC,
11091 Main Street. Fairfax, Virginia 22030 . (703)691-9100
March 25, 1991
Mr. George Qssman
Homer Research Labs, C-Building
Bethlehem Steel Corporation
Bethlehem, PA 18Q16
Dear Mr- Ossman:
In response to your request I have enclosed copies of several
documents which demonstrate our commitment to quality including
several of our certifications and accreditations and a general quality
assurance statement. AML-Industrial Hygiene is accredited by the
American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA), the National Voluntary
Laboratory Accreditation program (NVLAP), and is certified by the
Commonwealth of Virginia and the State of Florida to perform analysis
of drinking water for inorganic parameters. The laboratory
participates in several voluntary proficiency programs including a
program for lead and arsenic in filters and one for the determination
of PCB's in biological materials.
For the analyses which we discussed, BSFTPM and total particulate the
following procedures are currently in place. Most of the samples that
we currently analyze for BSFTPM are OSHA related so the final extract
volume is too small for any type of repeat analysis. Filters are all
prewashed with benzene and upon return to the laboratory, a blank
sample is analyzed with every group of nine samples. This is in
addition to the blanks that may be submitted by the client. ¦ We keep a
record of these values and have established lower and upper control
levels, which, if exceeded, require investigation. If duplicate
samples could be obtained, we would be more than happy to compare
extracted values and' statistically monitor any significant changes.
With regard to total particulate, filters are preweighed and every
tenth filter is reweighed and compared with the original filter
weight. A record of this information is also kept. Before any filter
weights are taken, the electronic balance is calibrated with a class S
standard weight on a daily basis and a record of these weights is
monitored.
If you need any additonal information, please contact me.
Fred I. Grunder
ACCREIMEO BY" AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION
-------
American
INDUSTRIAL
HYGIENE
ASSOCIATION
Jkmerictut'^edicar
Virginia
haa fuHUM AIHA erMria for
Industrial Hyfiana Laboratory Aeeradiiatian
-------
United Slates Department of Commerce
National Institute ol Standards and Technology
Certificate of Accreditation
vO
AMERICAN MEDICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
FAIRFAX, VA
i-> in i'i/ui i iI itiiih i IIii' Niilii'/iiW Vo/iiiihuii I iibiiiiihufi VrOijhini
/¦'J *iih--l(ii h'i ti it'fuf/jiiifi ¦* mill mli ilit i Lhil>li--lii'il in I ilh' I *» Pii/I 7 Ci'i/r of h'lli'hii Riyuhiltiiiii
Atitfilihihi'ii iMiitiKifri/ /<>i M irini hiltil I'll llir Sii'i'i- (if Aicrftlil/iliiM. lor-.
ASBESTOS FIBER ANALYSIS
April 1. 1990
I (|n lit!' null!
S?ATES °f
I xt Ifcr Niilli'UiW liolifuli' i'l Sluinjiirilt iiniJ In Iiui'/imIii
-------
COMMONWEALTH of VIRQINIA
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES
DIVISION OF 1 NORTH 14TH STREET
CONSOLIDATED LABORATORY SERVICES February 21, 1969 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA J3219
Mr. Fred I. Grunder
American Medical Laboratories
11091 Main Street
Fairfax, VA 22030
Enclosed is a copy of the on-site evaluation report for American Medical
Laboratories conducted on February 9, 1989 in accordance with the provisions
of the Regulations for the Certification of Laboratories Analyzing Drinking
Water in the Commonwealth of Virginia.
This report addresses itself to the deviations found in the area of Micro-
biology and Inorganic Chemistry. All deviations are included under the broad
headings: Laboratory Equipment and Supplies; Sample Collecting, Handling, and
Preservation; General Laboratory Practices; and Methodology and Analytical
Quality Control.
I
Comments' on specific deviations are listed under broad headings. If no
specific entries are made under such headings, this indicates that no devia-
tions were observed at the time of the on-site visit.
LABORATORY CERTIFICATION (BY SECTIONS)
MICROBIOLOGY - CERTIFIED
Total Coliform - MF Procedure
INORGANIC - CERTIFIED
Arsenic, Barium, Cadmium, Chromium, Copper, Iron, Lead, Manganese, Selenium,
Silver, Zinc, Fluoride, Nitrate, Chloride, Sulfate, pH
Your Laboratory I.D. Number is 00003.
Effective February 1989 through January 1992.
A letter to confirm and document the corrections of the listed deviations
must be received by this office within sixty (60) days after receipt of this
correspondence.
DOS
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES • DIVISION OF ENGINEERING & BUILDINGS
DIVISION OF PURCHASES & SUPPLY - DIVISION OF CONSOLIDATED LABORATORY SERVICES • DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT
" "I
! ,L-96 '
I -» ' j
-------
i
SPttUe SFl&Uda
«j^ 3€eadt/i tvruj tSte/iafafoCati&e SReMtdceA
Office of Laboratory Services
Post Office Box 210
Jacksonville, Florida 32231
1990 • 1991
£T/ua to c&Uify. that tAe 4tt&ouUotop named delate,
c&tnfvtie*/ <&iCA tecHon 40%l)-44 ofi €Ae ttfilvucta
9&ot£e fiebfa*n4mj, fa tttafat £e&£*ng, m
^0&C4t>4n^ Inorganic-Primary****************
*a : *>;
EFFECTIVE:October 31, 1990 through June 30, 1991
Ne .90 253
HR5#87348
American Medical Laboratories
11091 Main Street
Fairfax, VA 22030
NON-TRANSFERABLE
Eldert C. Hartwig, Jr., ScD.. M.P.H.
Chief. Laboratory Service;
Office of Laboratory Services
HRS Form 1629, Apr 90
L-97
-------
EXPinES
QtKil-31
COMMONWEALTH O*" VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF CL IEHCE
96W Wmi BrMd Siimi. Richmond. VA 2321*
TlUphoil*' 1 IBM) 367-aSOD
VIRGINIA ASBESTOS LICENCE
ASBESTOS ANALYTICAL LABORATORY LICENSE
NUMBER
QQotioa
AMERICAN MEDICAL LA1JOKATOK1 ELI, INC.
11091 MAIN STREET
FAIRFAX, VA 22030
ll AlMUf.M HAMJI
Milton K. Brnwn, I**., Director
{PICKtl c2J)33000003 (OETACM HERE)
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ~ DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE - 3600 Weti Broad Sueti Richmond, Virginia 23230
VIRGINIA ASBESTOS LICENSE
ASBESTOS ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
NUMBLH
EXPIRES
000003
08-31-91
AMERICAN MEDICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
11091 MAIN STREET
FAIRFAX. VA 22030
-------
Industrial Hygiene QC Plan
Introduction:
To maintain high standards of quality established by the
management of American Medical Laboratories, Inc.® (AMI.®),
is essential that each employee of AML have full knowledge
of the Quality Assurance objectives, policies and programs
as published. This policy is required to maintain the
public confidence associated with the reliability of
results reported on constituents analyzed at AML.
Purpose:
To establish Quality Assurance guidelines, procedures and
control practices to assure the appropriate performance of
all departments of the laboratory..
Policy:
The Quality Assurance Program at AML is designed to require
the active involvement of all employees and to:
1 .. Assure satisfactory handling of specimens from
collectipn through analysis which will ensure an
acceptable level of integrity of the specimens.
2. Provide instrument maintenance: schedules to include
both functional checks and preventive maintenance.
3. Establish a protocol for the adequate evaluation of
methodologies prior to selection and implementation.
4.. Provide adequate space, equipment and stable control
materials and reagents to accomplish the- mission of the
laboratory.
5. Ensure the competence of the personnel to perform the
tasks required.
6. Enhance communication by providing a comprehensive
program followed by instruction in quality philosophy.
7. Develop specific Quality Assurance objectives and a
system for monitoring the program to achieve the
performance required.
8. Provide support, supervision and communication between
all levels of management and staff members.
Responsibility:
1. Director of Laboratories
It shall be the role of the Laboratory Director, or his
delegate, the Vice-President of Clinical Operations, to
I ' L-99: -
-------
Industrial Hygiene QC Plan
Page 2
set the objectives of the laboratory Quality Assurance
Program.
2. Quality Assurance Supervisor
a. It shall be the primary responsibility of the
Quality Assurance Department to design, execute,
monitor and evaluate all Quality Assurance programs
to ensure that the objectives set by the
¦» Laboratory Director are fulfilled.
b. It shall be the responsibility of the Quality
Assurance Supervisor or delegate to manage the
required Proficiency Testing programs offered by:
T) College of American Pathology (CAP)
2) Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
3) National Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health (NIOSH)
4) Commonwealth of Virginia
5) Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
6) Environmental Proection Agency Quality Control
Program
7) State of New York.
Other Quality Control Programs which are not
mandatory are also managed by the Quality Assurance
Office. These include:
1) Wellcome Immunoassay Quality Control Programs
(I and II)
2) Wellcome Clinical Chemistry Quality Control
Programs
3} American Association of Clinical Chemistry -
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Program (AACC-TDM)
4) American Association of Clinical Chemistry -
Endocrinology Program (AACC-ENDO).
3. Technical Director or Technical Supervisor
a. It shall be the responsibility of the Technical
Director or Technical Supervisor of each department
to assure that each technical member of the
department staff has read and signed the Quality
Assurance Statement written for the department.
The statement will be initialed and dated again at
the time of annual review.
b. It shall be the responsibility of each Technical
Director or Technical Supervisor to monitor all
. L-100
j
-------
Industrial Hygiene QC Plan
Page 3
Quality Assurance procedures in their respective
departments and to assure that they are performed
properly and in a timely manner.
c. It shall be the responsibility of each Technical
Director or Technical Supervisor to: (1) respond
appropriately when notified of control or
instrument problems. (2) Institute corrective
action as. required. (3) Document action taken.
The Technical Director or Technical Supervisor
should inform the appropriate Vice-President of any
unresolved methodology problems.
d - It shall be the responsibility of each Technical
Director or Technical Supervisor to order and
maintain a sufficient supply of control materials
to assure availability of these controls at all
times. (When possible, at least a 12 month supply
should be ordered.)
e. It shall be the responsibility of each Technical
Director or Technical Supervisor to- assure the
parallel analysis of each new lot number of control
material introduced into the department. This will
assure that acceptable parameters for the' new
control' materials are established prior to its
being placed in use. In areas where control
material is not. available, other parameters will, be
assessed.
4 - Employees
a. It shall be the responsibility of each employee of
AML to perform all Quality Assurance procedures as
published.
b. It shall be the responsibility of each employee of
AML to report all Quality Assurance problems to the
appropriate supervisor immediately..
E. Analytical Procedures:
1. All analytical procedures shall be approved by the
division Director/Supervisor.
2. The procedures in each department shall be read by the
technical, staff. Any unauthorized changes in any
procedure are prohibited. Procedures are to be
followed as written unless otherwise instructed by the
Technical Director. Sample collection, storage,
processing and analysis information is included in each
method.
- - f
L-101 'j
-------
Industrial Hygiene QC Plan
Page 4
3. The following protocol will apply in all technical
areas;
a. Quality control -specimens should be analyzed with
each set of specimens when control material is
available for that analyte.
b. The results of all quality control specimens shall
be evaluated and recorded prior to the release of
results on any sample.
c. When the results of quality control samples are not
acceptable, the problem shall be defined and no
results will be released until it is approved by
the Technical Director of his designate.
d. The Quality Assurance Department shall be notified
by all departments of the following changes:
1) Change in test methodology
2) Change in manufacturer of reagents
3) Change in control, material, lot number or
manufacturer
4) Addition of a new-test procedure
e. Temperature of all. water baths, refrigerators,
freezers, and ovens shall be recorded and evaluated
every day they are in. use.
f.. The speed of all centrifuges and rotators shall be
checked monthly. Repairs are to be accomplished as
required.
g. All new thermometers shall be calibrated against an
NBS certified thermometer before being put into
service and at least annually thereafter.
h. All micropipettes shall be calibrated every month.
i. Bach deionized water outlet shall be examined for
bacterial growth on a scheduled monthly basis.
j. All instruments shall be calibrated and maintained
as described by manufacturer.
Maintenance records for all instruments will be
reviewed on a weekly basis. A written report of
this review will be submitted to the Quality
Assurance Office.
r
,
-------
6se TW-t - &WY.S
STPrKT - \\/36/*>
e-fto - > AV^v
Q\^K
Date
Value
Comment
c*
o
0
5
0
d
\
-3S
-2S
0
Q
O
o
0
0
O
i-
o
o
C>
6
0
6
+¦
¦*-
+
+
MEAN
+1S
+2S
+3S
'M;
o&n
m
n-ty
V<.
I
n /v?
-£L
/? /
iA_-J
Ji3
U-j
Ojon>
_uvL
(J. oi 3
M-5"
Q'^7
/2<
*¦ °'2
11 -(*
5g£
12-1
^z£_
I 2-T
Q- O''7
J 2'i a
-)0
n.oa
c.no^<
a^\
6 'OQ'
J *
0- ooqo
o-oo^lo
OOPfaS
I/'Q
Mo
MS
0 . & 6
L-103
-------
voi-i
~Wr
It:
Lttfi
TJVT
M'C
CO 'Q
CO -v
do-o
3£
<&)' o
cwr
lftt
00'0
QO • 0
£0 J0
*£L
W
LFi
M
ocr a
uVUtJ
QftT
uj
9£
4lW
-^3
00 <2
TtttT
oP'fl-
i^^sL i
-jopzr
T]
AS L
21
M
jU
lztztt
rrrr
ao'u
TTTTT
U i')
TWT
on' :j
hitil
MM
w.
*T7V
-jWiW
o.g "ft
i££l
ivUf/
Y-T 0
a"13
¦jA 7"
TTTT
rv
~x£l
TFiT
c?
-TcOT
"WPr
jgnr
Vib i>'J
1 sn
-z Q - Q
wn
IP'!?
WW
-M43-
*g - n
y(u
7^~
ti S'J
¦LLn'l
ho 0
U ft Q
Uo n ->
f-
T7T~o~
y
L '-?
7^
—t 7 ^ 7
0'-> o
"3^
Ll-l-rO)
OO1 Q
SC+ SZ+ SI+ NY3K ST-
%3l £Ol %S %0
(6ux^)
") — ^»0 ^Sra>cn
cia^o/o
sz- Hoaa.
-jaxny
ani^A
a^EQ
*ooi =
cwa%
/&/"/! :
smiisi =*> ^Dv3rw-9^
06/to/ot :axva
xhvhd ssNiHNar-iAaa
-------
HONTH /WAR TEAK 9/
PROCEDURE: TFq*) INSTRUMENT I &\
CONTROL! 3q ^ irff j,OT t
MEAN 2SD C.V.
2 S.O. RANGE
¦*?
*•*
-
S/CT
- «??y7
y/
?/f
-2«.oi7f
v
£
,Zo . «l st>
•
i'tD
,20.CMfts
//
Y«
¦tsO .Oi 51
" < '
Jfo
jAQiih
¦3(0
Po.0171
/i
-iii
£G. 0 Iff
f
,i4f
o-\ 7
-------
Section 6
Keystone Environmental Resources< Inc. Quality Assurance
L-106
-------
KEYSTONE
ENVIRONMENTAL RKSOIRCKS. INC.
3000 Tech Center Drive
Monroeville, PA 15146
412 825-9600
FAX 412 825-9699
Ref. No. 395110-01
August 3, 1992
Mr. George Ossman
Bethlehem Steel Corporation
Homer Research Laboratories
Building C
Bethlehem, PA 18016
Dear Mr Ossman:
Re: Kress Box Report, Response to EPA Comments
In response to EPA's comments on the report summarizing the determination of concentrations
of volatile and semi-volatile compounds in the headspace of Kress Box #3, the quality
assurance/quality control procedures followed in the program are summarized in the attached
table. Details of each procedure are listed below.
1 T^ps jnJferi&s
Two sorbent traps were connected in series in each sampling train to determine if all
constituents were captured in the primary sorbent trap. Both the primary and back-up
sorbent craps were analyzed separately to determine the capture efficiency.
2 Field Blank
A separate sampling train was transported to the site to serve as a field blank. No process
gases were pumped through the field blanks. These samples were analyzed with the
regular samples.
2 Surrogates Added to Extracts
Excluding the VOC sampling trains, constituents were extracted from the sorbent traps
and concentrated, in a liquid sample. Surrogate compounds were added to the extracts
prior to analysis. The analyses of the surrogate compounds are expressed as percent
recovery.
A CHESTER EnYironrrental Comoany
L-107
-------
To: Mr. George Ossman
Re: Kress Box Report, Response to EPA Comments
August 3, 1992
Page 2
4 Frequency of Concurrent Calibration
An initial five point calibration curve was prepared and analyzed for each compound of
interest. A continuing calibration standard was reanalyzed either every tenth sample or
every twelfth hour. If the results between the initial and concurrent concentration
differed by more than 15 percent, then a new five point calibration curve was prepared.
Tentatively identified compounds (TIC's) were determined by comparison of the retention time
and mass spectral data of the TIC's to those in a NBS library resident in the data system.
If you have any questions regarding my response, please call me at (412) 825-9760.
Very truly yours,.
John P. Shimshock
Air Quality Scientist
Air Quality Engineering
JPS:mjt
Enclosures
\ KEYSTONE
\ ~xMKu>MKVf*iHKsniKn:s,i\t'.
-------
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION'
SPARROWS POINT. MARYLAND
DETERMINATION OF CONCENTRATIONS OF
VOLATILE AND SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
IN THE HEABSPACE OF KRESS BOX #3
SUMMARY OF QAJQC PROCEDURES
Surrogates Frequency of
Constituent
4 Sample
Trains
Sorbcnt Tiaps
in Series?
Field
Blank 7
Analytical
EPA Method
Added to
Extracts?
Concurrent
Calibration
VOC's
2
yes
yes
TG-1
(GC/ITD)
no
None -
Initial 3-point
calibration only
VOC's - scan
1
no
yes
TO-1
(GC/ITD)
no
None-
Imdat 3-pdnt
calibration only
PAH's
2
yes
yes
610 (HPLQ
yes-
banzo(e)pyiene &
2-Buorobipheny)
every
10th sample
PAH's - scan
1
no
yes:
623 (GC/M5)
yes-
rri trohenzene-d5 &
2-fl»o»otjipk«ityl
every
12th hour
Phenols
& Cresols
2
yes
yes
625 (GC/MS)
yes-
luUubeiiZBne-d5
every
12tti hour
Phenols &
CresoLs - scan
1
no
yes
625 (GC/MS)
no
every
12th hour
Phthalatcs
2
yes
yes
623 (GC/MS)
yes-
nifirobenzene-d5 &
2-fluoiobiphcnyl
every
12th hour
Phthalatcs
1
no
yes
625 (GC/MS)
no
every
12th hour
L-10,9, ¦ I
\ KEYSTONE
\ K.SVJhdNVIkSm. KkNOl RLES. INC.
-------
Appendix M
Door Leak Data
M-1'
-------
NO. 11 6, 12 BATTERY
DAILY PERCENT DOOR LEAKS FOR 1991
Pe rcen t
Inspector Door
DATE Initials Leaks
01J AN 91
02JAN91
03JAN91 RA 6.5
04JAN91 RA 5.4
05JAN91-RA 7.1
06JAN91 RA 5.J
07JAN91
G8JAN91
09JAN91
10JAN91 RA o.b
11JAN91 PC 7.2
12JAN91 FC 7.7
13JAN91 FC 7.7
14JAN91
15JAN91
laJAW91
17JAN91 RA 7.5
18JAN91 RA 6.3
19JAH91 RA 7.2
20JAN91
21JAN91
22JAN91 CH 8.1
23JAM91 FC B.fi
24JAN91 RA 5.7
25JAN91 RA 6.3
26JAN91
27JAK91
28JAN9I
2 9JAN91 FC 7.4
30JAN91 FC 6.9
31JAN91 RA 5.1
01FEB91 RA 5.4
02FEB91
0 3FEB91
U4FEB91
05FEB91 FC 10.9
06FEB91 FC 6.1
07FEB91 RA 6.1
0SFEB91 RA 5.3
11FEB91 FC
12FEB91 FC ;.u
13FEB91 FC 7.5
14FEB91 RA b-6
15FEB91 RA 3.9
16FEB91
17FEB91
M-2
-------
-2-
MO. II & 12 BATTER*.'
DAI Lif PERCENT DOOR LEAKS FOR 1991
ir^ I'Ci
Inspector
Dix.r
DATE
Init ials
~=ak.
18FEB9)
PC
7 . 3
19FE091
2 0FEB91
FC
4 . 7
21FEB9I
RA
S. >
22FEB91
RA
4 . G
23FEB91
24FEB91
2SFEB91
26FEB91
RA
6 . -1
27FEB91
FC
7 . 2
2BFEB91
RA
6 . 6
0 LMAR91
RA
1, 3
U2MAR91
D3MAR91
0 4MAR91
Q5MAR91
RA
s. :j
06MAR9 I
RA
5.a
U7MAR91
RA
6 .
08MAR91
RA
7.4
Q9MAR91
10MAR91
11MAR91
12MAR91
FC
13MAR91
FC
3 . 6
14MAR91
RA
i.
15MAR91
RA
8.4
16MAR91
17MAR91
18MAR91
J.9MAH91
FC
* . J.
20MAR91
FC
11.0
21MAR91
RA
6 . if
22MAR91
RA
5. b
2 3MAR91
24MAR91
2 5MAH9I
2GMAR91
RA
I. -j
2 7MAE91
RA
8.2
28MAH91
RA
9 . u
2 9MAH91
RA
6 . 1
3CMAR91
31MAR91
02APR91
FC
U . 3
0 3APR 91
FC
¦0.4
04APR91
RA
6.'3
05APR91
RA
7 .7
G9APR91
FC
7. J
1CAPR91
FC
b.Z
• >1-3 ,
-------
-3-
NO ¦ 11 £ 12 BATTKHV
PAILy PERCENT POOR LEAKS FOP 1.991
Perc:
Inspector
Do... L
DATE
Initials
Leak
11APR91
HA
5 . •-<
12APR91
RA
6 .
i 6A.PR91
FC
!j . i
17APB91
FC
e. h
18APR9I
FC
8 .
19APR91
FC
¦i . 1
23APR91
RA
9 . L
2 4APR91
FC
9 . -1
2&APR91
RA
5. 1
26APR91
RA
6 . 8
30APR91
FC
7 . 7
01MAY91
FC ¦
6 .2
0 2MAY91
RA
a. >,
0 3MAY91
FC
a. 5
Q7MAY91
RA
4 . 1
Q8MAY91
FC
r-
09MAX91
RA
. <>
10MAY'91
RA
3 . 2
t 4MAY91
PC
9.;
1SMAY91
FC
9.4
16MAY91
RA
i . 4
17MAY91
RA
6.9
21MAY91
FC
li'i.B
22MAY91
FC
8 . 5
2 3MAS91
RA
6 . 0
24MAY91
RA
5.2
28MAY91
FC
LO . S
2 9MAY91
FC
11, ¦;
3DMAY91
RA
s , 3
31MAY91
FC
6. a
01JUN91
02JUN91
CJJUN91
04JUN91
RA
6 . o
05JUN91
FC
lit . 2
06JUN91
RA
4 . I
07JUN91
RA
H . s
0SJUN91
C/9JUN91
10JUN91
L1JUN91
FC
a. r.
12JUN91
RA
1 . 4
13JUN91
RA
8.0
14JUN91
RA
7 . 1
1bJUN91
| -H-4 '
i * '*
-------
HO. 11- & 12 BATTERi'
DAILY PERCENT DOOR LEAKS FLR I.MO 1.
PerccJi c
Ieispecc or Dour
DATE I nit ials Leaks
16JUN91
17JUN91
18JUN91
RA
1. 4
19JUN91
FC
; o. a
20JUN91
RA
i.j.
21JUN91
RA
8.1
2 2JUN91
2 3JUN91
24JUN91
25JUN91
FC
10.2
26JUN91
FC
6 . 3
2 7JUN91
RA
5. S
28JUN91
RA
a. a
29JUN91
3QJUN91
AUG90
9.4
SEP90
ii. 1
OCT 90
8.1
02JUL91
BA
5. A
03JUL91
FC
10.2
04JUL91
FC '
7.2
05JUL91
ISA
3 . 6
09JUL91
FC
8.0
10 JUL 9-1
FC
5.8
11JUL91
RA
6.6
12 JUL 91
RA
4.7
1SJUL91
KA
5 . 8
17JUL91
FC
8 . 3
18JUL91
RA
5.C
19JUL91
RA
i , G
23JULS1
FC
7.7
24JUL91
RA
6.3
2 5JUL91
RA
4.1
2 6JCL31
RA
6.3
30JUL91
RA
5.5
31JUL91
FC
3 . i
01AUG91
RA
LI .'J
0 2AUG91
RA
1.1
G6AUG91
FC
7 . i
07AUG91
FC
7
UKAUG91
FC
b. i.-
09AUH91
RA
i.i
13AUG91
RA
8.0'
14AUG91
FC
8.8
1SAUG91
RA
6. 3
>1-5
f .>»!
-------
MO. II it 12 BA'I'l'Ek i
DAI LV_ PERCENT DOOR LEAKS KOH I ;J-j
Perc
Inspector
Dog i'
DATE
Initials
k
16AUG91
FC
4 . ¦i
2 0AUC9I
FC
6 . 9
21AUG91
FC
b.'J
2 2AUG91
RA
8 . :
2 3AUG91
FC
n. ^ ¦
2 7AUG91
RA
6. o
28AUG91
FC
8.2
29AUG91
RA
4.9
30AUG91
HA
5.2
Q3SEP91
FC
7.5
04SEP91
FC
B.S
05SEP91
RA
3. j
06SEP91
RA
1. i
10SEP91
RA
4 . J
11SEP91
RA
7. i
12SEP91
RA
4."<
13SEP91
RA
4 .:
17SEP91
FC
b . ^
18SEP91
FC
6 .0
19SEP91
RA
3.0
20SEP91
FC
8.1
24SEP91
RA
6.6
2SSEP91
RA
3.8
26SEP91
RA
4.;
27SEP91
FC
a. ii
010CT91
FC
fi. 2
020CT91
FC
8. a
G3QCT91
FC
4 . 4
04OCT91
FC
5 . i
08OCT91
FC
7 fc
09OCT91
FC
b . 1
10OCT91
FC
6. 6
liocrai
HA
2 . 7
150CT91
FC
S . (j
~'\
"i
•>
-------
K>
fO
K>
hO
JO
tsJ
ISJ
»—
h-
H-
J—1
~—-<
o
O
er'
o
Q
LJ
UJ
KJ
rsj
M
K)
-0
o\
i_n
£•
IO
O
vo
LTI
J_.
Ia>
KJ
00
O'.
U*>
J—
k—•
o
\D
i_o
LO
z
Z
Z
Z
z
z
z
z
s
z
2
z
z
Z
z
z
z
o
O
o
O
o
o
o
O
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
O
D
O
O
G
o
o
n
n
n
n
o
o
<
<
<]
<
<
c
<
<
<]
<;
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
H
«-3
\£>
"£>
VD
u>
\o
VD
tiJ
-vD
U3
l£l
ID
<*D
o
o
VD
VO
vo
1—
»—<
h-
f-*
f—'
K-"
*—
I—»
1—1
I—"
>—»
/—1
t-1
i-1
3J
93
a
"3
TJ
rq
3)
50
3D
3J
SJ
fjj
"3
53
£~
>
3>
>
n
o
o
n
o
>
>
>
>
It-
n
n
n
n
n
>
n
>
O
o o o
n n o
^ ^ -3
53 JD
> J*
y>gvjccic-cc?!Oi*~
oc i_i' cr- -.: u Oj o •--
!!• 0) (Jl Ul U vj
— 'X' W CC tt -J
c. i- W
O
C
D
tr*
K
Z
h3
O
p]
W
o
i—
PJ
h-
£S
a
t-1
o
NJ
o
sd
CD
>
t-<
>-3
rt
*3
3*
UO
T<
x>
KTi
-A
~t;
o
!£¦
-
V£.
us
-------
Appendix N
Coal Data - Summary Tables and Graphs
Table of Contents
Section
1 Summary Table of Sparrows Point Coal Mix for 1991.
i 2 Summary Table of Sparrows Point Blended Coal Chemistry
for 1991.
3 Graphs of Sparrows Point Coal Properties.
4 Sparrows Point Coal Properties - Database.
| ¦ ' -N-l
-------
Section 1
Summary Table of Sparrows Point Coal Mix for 1991
-------
SPARROWS POINT COAL MIX 1991
Individual Coal Mix "fe 1991
Low Volatile:
Cambria
Jowei
Vu. Crewe
Total Low Volatile
High Volatile:
Moss
Lo Ming
Knox Creak
Total High Volatile
January February March
15.0 150 15.0
66 10.0 10.0
3,4
25.0 25.0 25.0
300 30 0 30.0
45.0 45.0 45.0
75.0 75.0 75.0
TABLE 1
April May June
15.0 15.0 15.0
10.D 10 0 10.0
25.0 25.0 25.0
IO.0 - -
45.0 45.0 45.0
200 300 30.0
75 0 75.0 75.0
July August September October November
15.0 15 0 15 0 15.0 15.0
10.0 100 10 0 10.0 10.0
25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0
45.0 45 0 45 0 45.0 51.0
30.0 30 0 30.0 30.0 24.0
75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0
-------
Section 2
Summary Table of Sparrows Point Blended Coal Chemistry for 1991.
-------
SPAR HOWS POINT BLENDED COAL CHEMISTRY
TABLE 2
Coal Blond Properties 1991
% Moisture
% Volalilas
% Ash
% Sullur
% Minus 1/B1
Bulk Density
January
7.9
29.4-
6.2
.79
78.8
48.0
February
7.0
28.8
6.2
82
78.9
48.0
March
?.fl
20.S
6.2
eo
?b a
47 9
April
?.a
90.2
6.2
79
78.7
48.0
May
7.6
20.6
6.3
.79
76.fi
47.S
June
71
29.2
6.2
.80
76.6
48.9
July Auqum
7.0 7.2
2S.1 so.o
6 2 6 2
-AO -79
79.0 76.9
48.5 48.5
September October
7.1 7-7
29.B 2tt,7
6.3 6.3
.78 .79
78.9 78 8
46.5 48 5
November
7.6
30.3
6.2
77
78.0
48.5
-------
COAL PROPERTIES - 11/12 BATTERIES
OVERALL STATISTICS
VARIABLE AVERAGE STANDARD MAXIMUM MINIMUM NUMBER OF
VALUE DEVIATION VALUE VALUE OBSERVATIONS
% SULFUR
0.79
0.03
1.26
0.73
703
% VOLATILE MATTER
29.61
0.87
33.00
27.10
703
% ASH
6.21
0.28
9.30
5.S0
703
% FIXED CARBON
64.17
0.90
66.90
60.20
703
% MINUS 100 MESH
15.63
1.61
22.00
9.70
698
% MINUS 1/8 INCH
78.84
0.24
79.80
78.09
364
% MOISTURE
7.42
0.67
9.B1
5.55
364
BULK DENSITY, LB/CU FT
43.21
0.27
48.66
47.79
364
N-6..
-------
COAL PROPERTIES - 11/12 BATTERIES
MONTHLY STATISTICS
VARIABLE AVERAGE STANDARD MAXIMUM MINIMUM NUMBER OF
VALUE DEVIATION VALUE VALUE OBSERVATIONS
DEC90
% SULFUR
0.80
0.02
0.85
0.77
59
% VOLATILE MATTER
29.16
0.67
32.30
28.30
59
% ASH
6.20
0.23
6.80
5.70
59
% FIXED CARBON
64.64
0.70
65.60
61.60
59
% MINUS 100 MESH
16.54
0.83
18.10
14.60
59
% MINUS 1/8 INCH
78.83
0.14-
79.15
78.54
31
% MOISTURE
7.30
0.49
8.75
6.60
31
BULK DENSITY, LB/CU FT
48.00
0.05
48.10
47.90
31
JAN91
% SULFUR
0.79
0.02
0.82
0.76
62
% VOLATILE MATTER
29.41
0.75
31.00
27.70
62
% ASH
6.24
0.23
6.80
5.70
62
% FIXED CARBON
64.36
0.80
66.20
62.50
62
% MINUS 100 MESH
16.49
1.31
19.90
12.40
62
% MINUS 1/8 INCH
73.82
0.27
79.80
78.54
31
% MOISTURE
7.92.
0.59
9.29
6.93
31
BULK DENSITY, LB/CU FT,
47.96
0.10
48.38
47.85
31
FEB91
% SULFUR
0.82
0.03
0.88
0.75
55
% VOLATILE MATTER
29.19
0.82
31.80
27.10
55
% ASH
6.20
0.24
6.70
5.80
55
% FIXED CARBON
64.60
0.93
66.90
61.50
55
% MINUS 100 MESH
15.87
1.40
18.20
12.40
55
% MINUS 1/8 INCH
78'. 08
0.21
79.44
78.61
23
% MOISTURE
6.95
0.38
7.85
6.45
28
BULK DENSITY, LB/CU FT
47.97
0.08
48.22
47.86
28
MAR91
% SULFUR
0.80
0.02
0.-85
0.76
62
% VOLATILE MATTER
29.83
0.79
31.50
28.30
62
% ASH
6.17
0.17
6.60
5.90
62
% FIXED CARBON
63.98
0.83
65.60
62.20
62
% MINUS 100 MESH
17.02
1.18
21.70
14.80
62
% MINUS 1/8 INCH
78.81
0.21
79.22
78.56
31
% MOISTURE
7.80
0.92
9.81
6.65
31
BULK DENSITY, LB/CU FT
47.94
0..07
48.10
47.82
31
APR91
1 SULFUR
0.79
0.02
0.84
0.74
58
% VOLATILE MATTER
30.18
0.74
32.00
28.60
58
% ASH
6.20
0.21
7.20
5.90
58
% FIXED CARBON
63.62
0.83
65.40
61.60
58
% MINUS 100 MESH
15.81
1.29
18.80
12.70
57
% MINUS 1/8 INCH
78.70
0.26
79.70
78.57
27
% MOISTURE
7.75
Q.38
8.90
6.95
27
BULK DENSITY, LB/CU FT
47.97
0.07
r"™ k-7.
48.10
47. SI
27
-------
COAL PROPERTIES - 11/12 BATTERIES
MONTHLY STATISTICS
VARIABLE AVERAGE STANDARD MAXIMUM MINIMUM NUMBER OF
VALUE DEVIATION VALUE VALUE OBSERVATIONS
MAY91
% SULFUR
0.79
0.02
0.87
0.75
58
% VOLATILE MATTER
29.57
0.68
31.20
28.20
58
% ASH
6.26
0.21
6.80
5.90
58
% FIXED CARBON
64.17
0.69
65.50
62.30
58
% MINUS 100 MESH
15.24
1.64
18.60
9.70
58
%. MINUS 1/8 INCH
78.82
0.16
79.47
78.65
31
% MOISTURE
7.60
0.42
8.39
6.74
31
BULK DENSITY, LB/CU FT
47.91
0.06
48.04
47.79
31
JUN9I
% SULFUR
0.80
0.02
0.87
0.74
59
% VOLATILE MATTER
29.18
0.69
31.50
27.70
59
% ASH
6.20
0.30
7.40
5.60
59
% FIXED CARBON
64.62
0.71
66.20
62.20
59
% MINUS 100 MESH
15.54
1.87
22.00
10.60
59'
V MINUS 1/8 INCH
78.84
0.26-
79.41
78.52
30
% MOISTURE
7.07
0.45
8.28
5.95
30
BULK DENSITY, LB/CU FT
48.33
0.20
48.58
47.84
30
JUL 91
% SULFUR
0.80
0.06
1.26'
0.75
61
% VOLATILE MATTER
29.13
0.52
30.20
27.70
61
%. ASH
6.20
0.26
¦ 7.20
5.SO
61
% FIXED CARBON
64.66
0.56
66.10
63.50
61
% MINUS 100 MESH
14.62
1..76
17.70
11.00
59
%¦ MINUS 1/8 INCH
78.95
0.32
79.35
78.09
31
% MOISTURE
6.95
0.59
8.25
5.55
31
BULK DENSITY, LB/CU FT
48-48
0.06
48.62
48-38
31
AUG91
% SULFUR
0.79
0.02
0.87
0.74
62
% VOLATILE MATTER
30.00
0.75
31.90
28.30
62
% ASH
6.15
0.31
6.80
5.60
62
% FIXED CARBON
63.83
0.81
65.60
62.00
62
% MINUS 100 MESH
15.27
1.52
18.30
10.60
62
% MINUS 1/8 INCH
78.91
0.28
79.44
78.51
31
% MOISTURE
7.17
0.55
8.14
6.22
31
BULK DENSITY, LB/CU FT
48.51
0.08
48.63
48.31
31
SEP91
% SULFUR
0.78
0.03
0.85
0.73
60
% VOLATILE MATTER
29.83
0.92
31.60
28.00
60
% ASH
6.27
- 0.52
9.30
5.50
60
% FIXED CARBON
63.90
1.00
65.60
60.20
60
% MINUS 100 MESH
14.67
1.23
17.90
11.20
60
% MINUS 1/8 INCH
78.55
0. 20
79.26
73.57
30
% MOISTURE
7.06
0. 46
8.06
6.44
30
BULK DENSITY, LB/CU FT
48.48
0.07
48.66
48.36
30
i.
i
1.
J
-------
COAL. PROPERTIES - 11/12 BATTERIES
MONTHLY STATISTICS
VARIABLE AVERAGE STANDARD MAXIMUM MINIMUM NUMBER OF
VALUE DEVIATION VALUE VALUE OBSERVATIONS
OCT 91
% SULFUR
0.79
0.03
0.84
0.73
61
% VOLATILE MATTER
29.67
0.96
31.60
27.10
61
%¦ ASH
6.25
0.26
6.90
5.60
61
% FIXED CARBON
64.08
0.95
66.90
62.50
61
% MINUS 100 MESH
15.46
1.55
18.80
12.00
59
% MINUS 1/8 INCH
78.84
0.18
79.23
78.50
30
% MOISTURE
7.69
0.49
8.99
6.59
30
BULK DENSITY, LB/CU FT
48.49
0.07
48.64
48.35
30
NOV91
% SULFUR
0.77
0.02
0.81
0.74
46
% VOLATILE MATTER
30.34
0.99
33.00
27.80
46
% ASH
6.20
0.19
6.70
6.00
46
%: FIXED CARBON
63.49
0.99
65.80
61.00
46
% MINUS 100 MESH
14.78
1.36
17.60
12.10
¦ 46
% MINUS 1/0 INCH
78.86
0.23
79.33
78.50
30
% MOISTURE
7.63
0.80
9.21
6.14
30
BULK DENSITY, LB/CU FT
48.46
0.06
48.63
48.34
30
-------
Section 3
Graphs ot Sparrows Point Coal Properties.
r
< -Nrio
-------
I?
80
% 75
c
CD
Q
D
GQ
C
o
jO
k_
CO
o
u
Q>
X
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
COAL PROPERTIES I
Fixed Carbon & Bulk Density
Sparrows Point Coke Batteries
12/01/90 - 12/05/91
Leg
• FIX
° BU
end
ED CAf
LK DEN
tBON
SITY
80
75 "5
c
-------
Coal PROPERTIES II
Moisture & Ash
Sparrows Point Coke Batteries
12/01/90 - 12/05/91
Legend
• Moisture
° Ash
"i i i i i i i i r
DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
1990 1991
Date
JWP
2/24/02
-------
COAL PROPERTIES lit
% -1/8 inch & % -100 Mesh
Sparrows Point 11/12 Battery
12/01/90 * 12/05/91
Legend
~ % -1/8 Inch
0 %
-100 mc
lah
A0*
fMr
DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
1990 1991
Date
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
JWP
2/24/92
-------
COAL PROPERTIES IV
% Sulfur & Volatile Matter
Sparrows Point Coke Batteries
12/01/90 - 12/05/91
40
35-
30
25
20-
O
=5 15
13
CO
10
0
Legend
• Volatile Matter
° Sulfur
40
35
30
25
20
<1)
CD
O
>
O
15 5
10
CO
1 1 1 T 1
DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
1990 1991
Date
0
JWP
2/24/92
-------
Section 4
Sparrows Point Coal Properties - Database.
/-
-------
COAL PROPERTIES FROM DAILY COAL MIX REPORTS
KIOC DEMONSTRATION PROJECT - BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
SPARROWS POINT. MARYLAND
16:22 Tuesday, March 31. 1992 1
VOLATILE
FIXED
PCT PASSING
OB 5
DATt
ROA
TURN
PLANT
MATTER
CARBON
ASH
SULFUR
FSI
100 MESH
1
12/02/90
1225
7-3
B
28.9
65.0
6. 1
0 St
7.5
18. 1
2
12/02/9O
1225
3- 11
B
29.0
64 .9
6. 1
0.79
7.5
17.4
3
1 2/03/90
1225
7-3
B
29. 1
64.4
6.5
0.81
7.5
14.6
4
12/03/90
1225
3- 11
B
28. a
65.3
5.9
o.ao
a.o
15.2
5
12/04/90
1225
7-3
B
2a. 7
65.5
5.8
0.80
7.5
16.7
6
12/04/90
1225
3- 11
B
20 . 4
64.8
6.8
0.80
7.5
17.2
7
12/05/9O
1225
7-3
B
29.2
64.8
6.2
0,77
7.5
16.4
B
1 2/05/90
1225
3- 1 1
e
28 . 7
€5.3
6.0
079
a.o
15.9
9
12/06/90
1225
7-3
B
26.6
65.2
6.2
0.80
8.0
17.3
10
12/06/9O
1225
3- 1 1
B
26.4
65.6
6 0
0.79
7.5
16 . 7
1 1
12/07/9O
1225
7-3
B
2B . 5
65 . 1
6.4
O. 79
7.5
17.4
12
12/07/90
1225
3- 1 1
B
28. 7
65. 1
6.2
0.83
7.5
16.8
13
12/08/90
1225
7-3
B
29.9
63.9
6.2
0.78
7.5
17.7
14
12/0B/90
(225
3- 11
B
29.9
63.6
6.3
0.78
7.5
16 . 9
15
12/09/9O
1227
7-3
B
2B.4
64 9
6.7
0.77
7.5
17.2
16
12/09/90
1227
3-11
B
28.3
64 .9
6.3
0 77
7.5
16.8
17
12/10/90
1227
7-3
B
29 . 3
64 1
6.6
o.ao
7.5
16.0
18
12/10/90
1227
3-11
B
20. 3
65.4
6.3
0 80
7.5
16 . 8
19
12/11/90
1227
7-3
a
29. 1
64 7
6.2
0.80
7.5
f6.5
20
12/11/90
1227
3- 1 1
B
29 . 2
64.8
6.0
0.79
a.o
17 . 2
2 1
12/12/90
1227
7-3
B
28.9
64.8
6.3
0.79
a.o
15.5
22
12/12/90
1227
3- 11
B
29.0
64 .8
6.2
0.82
7.5
16.8
23
12/13/90
1227
7-3
B
28.6
' 65.3
6. 1
0.82
7.5
16 . 2
24
12/13/90
1227
3-11
B
2a .4
6b. 2
6.4
0.79
7.5
17.6
25
12/14/90
1227
7-3
B
28.3
04 .9
ti. 2
0-81
7.5
16 ,0
26
12/14/90
1227
3- 1 1
B
28.6
65. 2
6.2
0.82
7.5
16 .8
27
12/15/90
1227
7-3
B
28. a
65. 1
6. 1
0.81
7.5
15. 3
28
12/15/90
1227
3- 11
B
28 . 9
65.O
6. 1
0-81
/. 5
16 .0
29
12/16/90
1230
7-3
B
29.3
64.7
6.0
o.ai
7.5
16 . a
30
12/16/90
1230
3-11
B
29. 2
€4.6
6.2
0.8 t
7.0
14 .a
3 1
12/17/90
1230
7-3
B
29 . 3
64.O
6 7
0 85
7.5
17 . 3
32
12/17/90
1230
3-11
B
28.6
64.9
6.5
0 84
7.5
17.0
33
12/18/90
12 30
3- 11
u
29. 2
64.2
6.6
0.83
7.5
18 0
34
12/19/90
1230
7-3
B
29 . 2
64 .5
6.3
0.80
7.5
15.5
35
12/19/90
1230
3- 11
B
29.5
64.3
6.2
0.80
7.5
16.6
3b
12/20/90
12 30
7-3
B
29. 1
64.8
6. 1
0.80
7.0
17. 2
37
12/20/90
1230
3- 1 1
B
28.S
65. 4
6.0
0.77
7.5
17 O
38
12/21/90
1230
7-3
B
29-2
64.7
6. 1
0.80
7.5
15.8
33
12/21/90
1230
3- 1 1
B
28.9
65.0
6. 1
0.81
7.5
16. 2
40
12/22/90
1230
7-3
B
28.6
65. 1
G. 3
0.81
7.5
16.0
41
12/22/90
1230
3-t^
B
28 .3
65. i
6. 1
0.84
a.o
16. 2
42
12/23/90
1232
7-3
B
29.5
64 4
6 . 1
0.82
7.0
16. 1
43
12/23/90
1232
3-11
B
30.5
63.5
6.0
0.80
7.5
17 . 2
44
12/24/90
1232
7-3
B
30.5
63.0
6.5
0 81
7.5
17.4
45
12/24/90
1232
3- ft 1
B
30. 3
63.7
6.0
0.73
7.5
16.4
46
12/25/90
1232
7-3
B
29.7
64 .3
6.0
0.78
7.5
16. 8
47
12/25/90
1232
3-11
B
29.5
64.3
6.2
0.82
a.o
17.6
4fi
12/2S/90
1232
7-3
B
32. 3
61.6
6. 1
0.82
7.5
14.9
49
12/26/90
1232
3-11
B
30. 1
63.8
6. 1
0.82
8.0
16. 1
50
12/27/90
1232
73
B
29 .9
63.8
6.3
0 82
a.o
15.5
51
12/27/00
1232
3 11
B
29 .6
63.8
6 6
0.79
a.o
16.3
52
12/28/90
1232
7-3
B
30.0
64 1
5.3
0 78
75
15.8
53
12/28/90
1232
3-M
B
29.0
64.8
6.2
0.78
a.o
15. 1
-------
CDAL PRDPtKTIES FROM DAILY COAL MIX REPORTS
K1UC DEMONSTRATION PROJECT ~ BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
SPARROWS POINT, MARYLAND
16:22 Tuesday, March 31, 1992 2
25
i
VOLATILE
FIXED
PCT PASSING
OBS
DATE
RQA
TURN
PLANT
MATTER
CARBON
ASH
SULFUR
FSI
100 MESH
54
12/29/90
123?
7-3
B
29. 1
G5.2
5.7
0.81
B.O
15.2
55
12/29/9O
1232
3-11
B
28.8
65.3
5.9
0.79
7.5
16. B
56
12/30/9O
1234
7-3
B
2B.B
65. 1
6.1
0.81
7.5
17.4
57
12/30/90
1234
3- 11
R
28. 7
£5.5
5.8
0.80
8.0
16.4
58
12/31/90
1234
7-3
B
29.2
64.4
6.4
0.80
7.5
18. 1
59
12/31/QO
1234
3- 11
B
29. 3
64 .5
6.2
o.ao
7.5
16 .6
60
01/O1/91
1234
7-3
B
29.7
63.9
6.4
0.79
7.5
17 . 1
61
01/CJ1/9 1
1234
3-11
B
30.0
63. B
6.2
0.79
6-0
15.9
62
01/02/91
1234
7-3
B
28 . 5
65.4
6. 1
0-S2
8 .0
16.3
63
01/02/91
1234
3-11
B
28.9
64.7
6-4
0.62
8.0
14.4
64
01/03/91
1234
7-3
B
28.9
65. 1
60
0.82
7.5
17.5
65
01/03/91
1234
3- 11
B
28.6
65.5
5.9
O.B2
7.5
16.2
66
01/04/91
1234
7-3
B
28.S
64 .a
6.3
0.81
8.0
16.3
67
01/04/91
1234
3- i 1
B
2S.2
65.5
6.3
o.ao
6.0
17.0
68
01/05/91
1234
7-3
B
30.0
63.4
6.6
0.76
7.0
15.8
69
01/05/&1
1234
3-11
B
29.6
64 .2
€.2
0.79
7.5
16.2
70
Ol/Ob/91
1236
7-3
B
31.0
62.5
6.5
0.78
8.0
17.5
7 t
O1/06/91
1236
3-11
B
29. 7
64.6
5.7
0.77
7.5
18.3
72
01/07/91
1236
7-3
B
28.5
65.2
6.3
O.S2
7.5
17. 1
73
- 01/07/91
1236
3-11
B
29. 1
64.6
6.3
0.79
B.O
16.4
74
01/OB/91
1236
7-3
B
27,7
66.2
6.1
0.79
8.0
15.8
75
0I/O8/S1
1236
3- 1 1
B
27.9
65.9
6.2
0.79
6.0
16. 1
76
01/O9/91
1 23€
7-3
B
26. 3
65 „ &
5 9
0.81
B.O
17.6
77
O1/09/91
1236
3-11
B
28.7
65.2
€.1
0.81
7.5
17.3
78
O1/10/91
1236
7-3
B
29. 4
63,8
6.8
0.79
7.5
18.8
7S
01/10/91
1236
3-1 i
B
30.0
63.7
6.3
0.8 1
7.5
1B.0
BO
01/11/91
1236
7-3
B
28.5
65.5
€.0
0.82
7.5
17.2
B1
01/11/91
1236
3- 1 1
B
29.5
64,0
6.5
0.80
8.0
16. b
B2
01/12/91
1 236
7-3
B
30.3
63.5
6.2
0.79
8.0
17.4
83
01/12/31
1236
3-11
B
29.6
64.3
6.1
0.82
8.0
16.8
B4
01/13/31
1238
7-3
B
30. 7
63. 1
6.2
0.79
B.O
17 .0
85
01/13/91
1 236
3-11
B
30.4
63:2
6.4
o.ai
7.5
16 . 3
86
01/14/91
1238
7-3
B
29. 5
' 64.4
6. 1
0.78
7 .5
15.8
87
01/14/91
1238
3-1 1
B
29.6
64.4
6.0
O. 79
7.5
16.8
8a
01/15/91
1238
7-3
B
30.8
63.3
5.9
0.79
7.5
16.7
89
01/15/91
1238
3-11
B
30.8
63.4
6.4
0-77
7 0
16. 1
9G
01/16/91
1238
7-3
B
29.6
64.2
6.2
0.82
7 .5
19 H
91
01/16/91
1238
3-11
B
30 . 4
63 8
5.8
0.77
7.5
14.8
92
01/17/91
1238
7-3
B
30.0
63.7
6.3
0.79
8.0
16.4
93
01/ t "7 / fi 1
1 2'J8
3-11
B
30 O
63 . 7
6.3
O- 78
8.0
IB . B
94
01/18/91
1238
7-3
B
30 1
63 9
6.0
O. 80
7 .5
16.4
01/ ia/91
12J6
3-lt
B
29 . 2
64 . 7
6. 1
0.80
7.5
17 .0
9&
01/19/9 I
1
7-3
B
29.8
64 . 2
6.2
0.82
7.0
16.S
97
01/19/91
1238
3- 1 1
B"
30. 1
64 . 1
5-8
0.78
8.0
16.5
98
01/20/91
1 240
7-3
B
29 . 4
64 ,5
6. 1
0.80
7 .b
15 .0
99
01/70/91
1240
3- 1 1
B
29 . 6
6.4.4
6.0
0.79
7.0
15. 9
100
01/21/91
1240
7-3
B
29.3
64.2
6.5
0.81
7.5
14.7
101
01/21/91
1240
3- 1 1
B
29 , 7
64.0
6.3
0.79
7.5
16 . B
102
01/22/91
1240
7-3
B
30 . G
62.9
6.5
0.76
8.0
15.6
(03
01/22/91
1240
3-1 1
B
30.0
63.4
6.6
0.77
8.0
16.0
104
01/23/91
1240
7-3
B
29 . 3
64 .5
6.2
0.78
7.5
15.2
105
01/23/91
1240
3- 1 1
B
28.6
65.4
6.0
0.80
7 .5
17.9
106
01/24/91
1240
7-3
B
28.6
65.2
6.2
0.8 1
8.0
15.9
-------
d'ii-tif
OOOOOOOOQOCCOOOOOOOQOOOOOOOOOOOQOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
MW!CM!OM!0)0!0(O^MIOWfOfOMMU>JMMfOUMMfOWMMIOWWUWfOk)!sj.l«,^»^a4-,a*^»4^^^^J
WSS.N.XSSSSS.S.S.SN.S.NS.NNSSVS.SXNSSSSSSSSS.SS.SS.VNVSSSSSSSSSS
M-i--.a--rf-jBI«.<--.---j,rfooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOuU!JUUMWWKiMMM(JWM
V\\V\SS\\WSSN\s\S\N.NSNVNSSSSSNSNV \ \ wnnnnnnsss w nnns,
(Ptf|£V¥l£(fil^(0lfi(CWtt'ttVlfiUtCttl0VVDttVQQtftflC(OOO
-l I _* I _ _L I | | I ->
I (J I U I I U U I U U I
-J M -J -«J ««J <
_h ^ _ -*j - *g
I — I -*¦ I
U I U I u
^ —
_ I _ I _ I I I ,
I U I U I " u u
-* -i -J —
-* I I —i
I U U 1
DaCDtDDSDDCEECaiSCDISDSCDaSEDaimDaiODCDtSCSQSDISODDCClCSDODBItSDCDBlCnsaieSDOOCBeDCBCD.CaCDa
JO M
JO
ro
'O
M
JO
fO to
ro ro
M U U W fO fO
Ji ^
.6»
fe.
¦fc
*».
^ J*
^ Ji £¦ ia. Js
JO JO
IO
ro
M
ro
ro
JO fO
to 10
M05000
w -J
LJ
-j
U
->j
w
^ o
<•4 U
-^U-JU-olU
-»• u
A
u
L
St>
L
u —•
Sd —
U (J ^ u «
D a
tocns&iesDoocB
CD S3 B.CDHCD
«>'jiui£>Ln^(jiu^[ntjiuiu&&i»(ij.&Ct(Ji4j(nuiuu^uu^u^6^t^Auu^&&^iuuAAuu^AcniAA
(OM^-j,0cni^u>oou^b^o>o^o)UQ.b<£iCi>>otDtta(£(ck3m&m-»iCDioi£»!&^j(&^)a)iolocA(eLiK9ih9auio(lj^a:
oopopppppppppppppcpppoppopoppppppppppppppcppppppoocpp
OBs>©cs©©ro©©ese£''«j^jce'CB03©isc&roomos©«»j-«3'«j'>o®-j-j-j-j'»;^j'»j«j-j©«j^j^®©eo'lCBO(D
I?
MUUUUUMUUUMMUhlUUUUUMMUMUMUUUMUlOIOUMWHfOUMU'JUUMlOIOUIOUNUUM -H >
V0D»»^RO»[DO3'UUftU)iW»ttbsUK«U[]|»U-tU)U^KOll|)UUQ)$ft' t-
73 *
03 m
© O
Z
o
m n
s o
33 -g m
23 50 Ifl
~ o
c c. -n
IA m 70
r> o
¦D H 3
2 | o
5®S
- rn r
¦ 3*
sss
-: X »
r- ti r—
> s
Z 3
DtflH
-t X
uiirGinciuimooiRCutciirOTOOiroocitiomuitJiuiouiinuiuijiu'UiuicrinouiOtfuiuiuiOUGOtfuiOui
— ^-(ccobu® — — b»'-tt*-i'JC,'tf>fljo.j-.*broiob>>obb)oij>W'o>o*>'toi»-
8-
m trt
{/S NH
xl
c
®
UJ
&
-------
COAL PROPERTIES FROM DAILY COAL MIX REPORTS
Kinr: demonstration project - bethlehem steel corporation
SPARROWS POINT, MARYLAND
1G:22 Tuesday. Marcfi 31. 1992 4
VOLATILE
f IXE0
PCT PASSING
QQS
DATE
ROA
TURN
PLANT
MATTER
CARBON
ASH
SULFUR
F5I
100 MESH
160
02/20/91
1252
7-3
B
28.9
64-8
6.3
0.81
7.5
13.3
161
02/21/91
1252
11-7
B
28.9
65.4
6.3
0.83
7 . 5
66.8
162
02/21/91
1252
7-3
B
28,7
64 fi
6.5
0.83
7.5
16.6
163
02/22/91
1*252
11-7
B
29.0
64.9
6.1
0.84
7.5
15.3
164
02/22/91
1252
7-3
B
SB.8
64.9
6.3
0. 83
? . 5
17.7
165
02/23/91
1252
1 1-7
B
29.5
64.3
6.2
0.82
8.0
16.8
166
02/23/91
1252
7-3
B
29. 1
64.7
6.2
0.82
8.0
15.6
167
02/24/91
1254
11-7
B
28.3
65.6
6.1
0.84
a.o
15.3
168
02/24/91
1254
773
B
29.2
64 .9
5.9
0.84
8.0
16.3
169
02/25/91
1254
11-7.
B
28.4
65.4
62
0.82
8.0
16.O
170
02/25/91
1254
7-3
B
29.3
64.7
6.0
0.80
7.5
16.0
17 1
02/26/91
1254
1 1-7
B
27 , 1
66.9
6.0
0.83
7.5
17.7
172
02/26/91
1254
7-3
B
27 .6
£6.4
6.0
0.82
a.o
16 . 9
173
02/27/91
1254
11-7
B
30.6
62.8
6.6
0.83
? . 5
S6.5
174
02/27/91
1254
7-3
B
31.8
61.5
6.7
O.B2
7.5
16 8
175
02/28/91
1254
11 7
B
30.5
63.2
6.3
0.79
8.0
17. 1
176
02/28/91
1254
7-3
B
29.4
64.2
6.4
O. BO
7.5
16.8
177
03/01/91
1254
11-7
B
29.7
64. 1
6.2
0.78
7.0
17.0
— 178
03/01/91
1254
7-3
B
29.3
64.5
6.2
0.80
7.0
16.8
179
03/02/91
1254
11-7
B
29.0
64.9
6.1
0.81
7.5
15.6
180
03/02/91
1254
7-3
B
29.3
64 5
6.2
0.80
7.0
16.6
*.v
181
03/03/91
1756
11-7
B
29.8
64. 2
6.0
0.80
7.5
16.0
J
182
03/03/91
1256
7-3
B
26.7
65.2
6- t
0.76
6.0
16.4
v-SS
183
03/04/91
1256
11-7
B
30. 9
62.9
6.2
0.79
8.0
17 . 1
8'
' l-li
184
03/04/91
1256
7-3
B
30.3
63.3
6.4
0. SO
7.5
16.3
sO
185
03/05/91
1256
11-7
B
30.7
62.7
6.6 '
0.76
7.5
16.8
186
03/05/91
1256
7-3
B
30,0
63.9
6. 1
0.79
8.0
16.2
1fi7
03/06/91
1256
11-7
B
28.9
65.2
&.9
O. 83
7.5
17 .5
i iaa
03/06/91
1256
7-3
B
29 .6
64 4
6.0
0-80
7.5
17 „ 1
~ 189
03/07/91
1256
11-7
B
29.0
64 .9
6. 1
0.78
7.5
17 .O
190
03/07/91
1256
7-3
B
28.9
64.9
6.2
o.ao
8.0
16 . 4
191
03/08/91
1256
1 1-7
B
29 .0
64.7
6.3
0.80
8.0
16 .4
192
03/08/91
1256
7-3
B
29.8
64 1
6. 1
0- 83
7.5
17 . 1
(93
03/09/91
1256
11-7
B
29.5
64. 1
6.4
0.80
8 .O
16.5
194
03/09/91
1256
7^3
B
29.5
64 3
6.2
0.&1
& .O
16.9
195
03/10/91
1258
11-7
B
28 . 9
64 .8
6.3
O. 79
7 .5
17 .3
196
03/10/91
1258
73
B
26 .7
64.9
6.4
0.81
7.5
17 . 1
197
03/11/91
1258
11-7
B
28 .3
65 .6
6 . 1
o.ai
8.0
16 . 8
198
03/1 1/91
1258
7 3
B
28 .7
65 .3
6.0
0. 79
7 . 5
16.fi
199
03/12/91
1258
1 1 -7
B
29.2
64 .5
6.3
0.80
7 . 5
17 .5
?oo
03/ 12/91
t25B
7-3
B
28 . 7
64 .9
6.4
0.3 I
7 . 5
17 . 4
201
03/13/9 1
1258
1 1-7
&
30.4
63.4
6.2
0.80
7.5
17.3
202
03/13/9 1
1258
7 3
B
30.3
63.3
6.4
0.77
7.5
16 .0
203
03/ 14/9 1
1258
117
B
30 . 4
63 3
6.3
O. 78
7 . 5
16 . 8
204
03/14/91
1258
7-3
B
30.0
63 .4
6.6
O. 78
7.0
16.3
205
03/15/91
1258
11-7
B
23.5
64 .4
6. 1
0.80
7.5
16.3
206
03/15/91
1258
7-3
B
28 .6
64 1
6.3
O. BO
7 . 5
16.0
207
03/16/91
1258
11-7
B
2B.3
65.4
6.3
0.83
8.0
15.9
206
03/10/91
1258
7-3
a
29.8
64.2
6.0
O . 8 1
7 . 5
16.6
" - 209
03/17/91
1 2 GO
1 1-7
a
28.9
65.0
6. 1
0.81
8.0
18.8
210
03/17/91
1260
7-3
B
29.0
64.9
6. 1
0.8I
7.0
19.3
2 1 !
03/18/91
120O
1 1-7
B
30.8
63 . 1
6 . 1
0.80
7 , 5
14 . 8
2 12
03/18/91
1260
7-3
B
SO. 6
63.5
5.9
0.79
7.5
16.9
-------
COAL PROPERTIES FROM DAILY COAL MIX REPORTS
KIDC DEMONSTRATION PROJECT - BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
5PAKWOVS PO/NT, MARYLAND
VOLATILE
FIXED
oes
DATE
ROA
TURN
HLANT
MAT 1tR
CARBON
ASH
SULFUR
2 13
03/19/91
1260
1 1-7
R
30.3
63.5
6.2
0.77
214
03/19/91
1260
7-3
B
30.6
63. 3
6 1
0.77
215
03/20/91
1260
11-7
B
30-3
63.7
6.0
0.8O
216
03/20/91
1260
7 3
a
29.7
64.3
6 O
o.so
217
03/21/91
f 260
1 1 -7
B
29.0
G5. 1
5.9
o.ao
2 18
03/21/91
1260
7-3
B
29.5
64.5
6 0
0. 79
219
03/22/91
1260
1 1-7
B
29.9
64. O
6 1
0.81
220
03/22/91
(260
7-3
a
30.5
63.5
SO
0.81
221
03/23/91
1260
1 1-7
B
30.8
63.0
6 2
0.79
222
03/23/91
1260
7-3
B
30.5
63. 3
6 . 2
O.SO
223
03/24/91
1262
1 1-7
a
30. 1
63. a
6. 1
O . 79
224
03/24/91
1262
7-3
B
30.3
63.4
6 3
0.82
225
03/25/91
1262
1 1-7
B
29 . 2
64 .8
SO
G.82
226
03/25/91
1262
7-3
B
29.4
64 . 4
6 2
0.85
227
03/26/91
1262
1 1-7
B
29 0
64 .4
6.6
0.80
228
03/26/91
1262
7-3
B
30.8
63. 1
6. 1
0.81
229
03/27/91
1262
11-7
B
31 . 3
62.6
6. 1
0.92
230
03/27/91
1262
7-3
a
31. 1
62.9
6.0
0.81
23 1
03/28/91
I2G2
1 1-7
B
3Q.6
63. 3
6 . 1
0.8 1
232
03/28/91
126?
7-3
B
30.5
62.2
6,3
0.82
233
03/29/91
1262
1 1-7
B
30 . 3
63 7
6 0
0.79
234
03/29/91
1262
7-3
B
30.5
63 4
6 1
O .80
235
03/30/91
1262
1 1-7
. B
31.5
62 4
6. 1
0. 76
236
03/30/91
1262
7-3
B
30.8
63 1
6 1
0. 77
237
03/31/91
1264
11-7
B
30. 3
63. 3
b 4
0.77
238
03/31/91
1264
7-3
a
30.5
63. 1
6.4
0.80
239
04/01/91
1264
1 1-7
B
so. a
63.2
6 0
O 78
240
04/01/91
1264
7-3
B
30.8
63.0
6 2
0 81
24 \
04/02/91
12G4
11-7
a
30.4
63.3
6.3
0.81
242
04/02/91
1264
7 3
~
29.6
64.3
6. 1
0.84
24a
04/03/91
1264
1 1-7
B
31.5
62 1
6 . 4
O.EI
244
04/03/91
1264
7-3
B
31.6
61 .8
6 . 6
0.7B
245
04/04/91
12G4
1 1-7
a
31 .O
62 .8
6.2
0.83
246
04/04/91
1264
7-3
B
30.4
63.5
6 . 1
0.78
217
04/05/9 1
1264
1 1-7
B
30. 1
63.6
6 3
0.77
248
04/05/91
1264
7-3
B
316
62. 3
6. 1
0.81
249
04/06/91
1264
1 1-7
B
30.7
63. 3
SO
0 81
250
04/06/91
1264
7-3
B
30.8
63. 1
6 . 1
0.79
251
04/07/91
1266
11-7
B
30. 4
63.3
6 . 3
0 .80
252
04/07/91
1266
7-3
a
31 2
62 .4
6.4
0 80
253
04/00/91
1266
11-7
u
29.4
64 .6
6 O
0 77
254
04/08/91
1266
7-3
B
29.5
64.6
5 3
0.79
255
04/09/91
1266
11-7
B
30.2
63. 7
6 . 1
0.76
256
04/09/01
1266
7-3
B
30.6
63 2
6 . 2
0.76
257
04/10/9 1
1266
1 1-7
B
30. 4
63.5
6 1
0.80
25b
04/ 10/91
1266
7-3
B
30-2
63.8
6 0
0.79
259
04/11/91
1266
1 1-7
B
30. 5
63. 3
6.2
0.77
260
04/1 1/91
1266
7-3
B
31 .0
62.5
6.5
0.77
26 1
04/12/91
1266
1 1-7
B
29 . 2
64.6
6 2
0,77
262
04/12/91
1266
7-3
B
2B. 7
65. 2
6 1
0.77
263
04/13/91
1266
11-7
B
31 . 1
62.8
6. 1
0.78
2fc>4
04/11/91
t 9 fifi
7-3
B
30. 7
63 3
6.0
0.75
265
04/14/91
1268
1 1-7
B
29 . 8
64 .0
6 2
0.77
16:22 Tuesday. March 31, 1992 5
PCT PASSING
FSI
100 MESH
7.5
15.5
7.5
16 .0
SO
16 . 7
7.0
15. 3
7.5
16.0
7.5
16.6
7.5
16.5
7.5
17 0
7.5
16.5
7.5
17. 1
7 a
ts.s
7.5
16.2
7.5
17.5
8 .O
16.8
7.5
21 . 7
8 .O
13 . 7
7.5
16.3
8.0
18. 1
7.5
20.5
7.5
16. b
8.0
13.0
7.5
17.4
7.5
18.5
7 . 5
17.3
7 . 5
17.2
8.0
15.6
7.5
15.2
7 O
14.8
7.5
16.3
7.5
15. 1
8.0
17. 1
8,0
15.2
7.0
16 . 1
7.b
16.7
7. 0
15.0
7 , 5
17.0
7.5
16.5
7 , 5
17. 1
8.0
17.4
7.0
16.6
7.5
18.2
a.o
17.6
7-5
16.5
7.5
17. 1
7.5
17.0
7.5
16.9
7.5
17.7
7.5
17. 1
a.o
16 . 4
a.o
18.6
7.5
15. 1
8 .O
14.7
7.5
14.2
-------
COAL PROPERTIES FROM DAILY COAL MIX REPORTS
KIDC DEMONSTRATION PROJECT - BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
SPARROWS POINT, MARYLAND
VOLATILE
FIXED
OB 5
DATE
ROA
TURN
PLANT
MATTER
CARBON
ASH
SULFUR
266
04/11/91
1268
7-37
B
30.2
63 .4
6 .4
O. 79
267
04/15/91
1268
11-7
B
29.6
64 .4
6.0
0.81
268
04/15/91
1268
7-3
B
29.5
64 .4
6 . 1
O. B4
269
04/16/91
1268
11-7
B
30.3
63.4
6.3
0.78
270
04/16/91
1268
7-3
B
30.5
63.0
6.5
0.79
271
04/17/91
1268
1 1-7
B
29 .2
64 .6
6.2
0 . 78
272
04/17/91
1268
7-3
B
29.7
64.0
6.3
0.79
273
04/ 18/91
1268
11-7
B
26 .6
65 .4
6.©
0.82
274
04/ 18/91
1268
7-3
B
29 . 5
64 3
6.2
0.82
275
04/19/91
1268
11-7
B
30.9
62 .9
6.2
0.80
276
04/19/91
1268
7-3
B
31.1
62 .5
6.4
0.83
277
04/20/91
1268
11-7
B
32.0
61.6
6.4
0.78
278
04/20/91
1268
7-3
B
30 -3
63.5
6.2
0.81
279
04/21/91
1270
1 1-7
a
30.4
63.3
6.3
0.77
280
04/22/91
1270
11-7
B
29.6
64.4
6.0
0.77
281
04/22/91
1270
7-3
B
30.0
63.6
6.4
0.82
262
04/23/91
1270
1 1-7
B
30. 4
63.5
.6.1
0.76
283
04/23/91
1270
7-3
B
30.4
63.2
6.4
0.77
284
04/24/91
1270
11-7
B
29.7
64 5
6.©
0.76
285
04/24/91
1270
7-3
B
30.4
63.5
6.3
0.76
286
OA/26/9 1
1270
11-7
B
29.5
64.6
5.9
0.75
287
04/25/9 1
1270
7-3
B
29 . a
64 .2
6.0
0 . 74
288
04/26/91
1270
11-7
B
29.6
64.2
6.©
0.77
289
04/26/91
1270
7-3
B
30. 1
62 .7
7.2
o.ao
2 SO
04/27/91
1270
11-7
B
30. 1
63 .7
6.2
0.76
291
04/27/91
1270
7-3
B
30.2
63.7
6.1
0.76
292
04/28/91
1272
11-7
B
saa
04/38/91
1272
7-3
B
29 . 2
64 .7
6. 1
0.77
294
©4/29/91
1272
11 7
B
29.5
64.4
6. 1
0.77
29b
©4/29/91
1272
7-3
B
29.4
64.7
5.9
0.78
29G
04/30/91
1272
1 1-7
B
29 . 4
64 2
6.4
0.78
297
04/30/91
1272
7-3
B
29.2
64.5
6.3
0.75
296
©5/01/91
1272
1 1 7
B
28 . 2
65.5
6.3
0.79
299
05/01/91
1272
7-3
B
28.9
64. B
6.3
0.77
300
05/02/91
1272
11 -7
B
28.3
65. 1
6.6
0. 78
301
05/02/91
1272
7-3
B
28.5
64.7
6.8
0.79
302
05/03/91
1272
11-7
B
30. 1
63.6
6.3
0.77
303
05/03/91
1272
7-3
B
30.0
63.5
6.5
0. 76
304
O5/04/91
1272
1 1 -7
B
29 .9
64 .0
6. 1
0.76
305
05/04/91
1272
7-3
B
29 .9
63.7
6.4
0.76
306
05/05/91
1282
1 1-7
B
23 .3
64. O
6.7
0.7B
307
05/05/91
1282
7-3
B
28 . 9
64.9
6.2
0,79
308
05/06/91
1282
11-7
B
29 . i
64 f
6.8
o.ao
309
05/06/91
1282
7-3
B
28.7
65 0
6.3
0.81
310
05/07/91
1282
1 1-7
B
29.4
64.5
6. 1
0. 79
31 1
05/07/91
1282
7-3
B
28.9
64.9
6.2
o.ao
3 1 2
05/08/91
1282
1 1-7
B
29 .4
64 .5
6 . 1
0.77
313
05/08/91
1282
7-3
B
29 .6
64 .5
5.9
0.77
314
05/09/91
1282
1 1-7
B
29.6
64. i
6.3
0. 76
315
05/09/91
1282
7-3
B
28 .7
65 .2
6. 1
0. 62
316
05/10/9 1
1282
11-7
B
20 .7
65 2
6.1
0.83
317
OS/10/91
1282
7-3
B
29.5
64.2
6.3
0.79
318
05/11/91
1282
t 1-7
B
29.4
64 .5
6. 1
0.78
16:22 Tuesday, March 31, 1992 €
PCT PASSING
FSI 100 MESH
7
5
12
7
7
0
15
3
7
5
16
3
7
5
15
5
7
5
15
2
7
5
13
6
7
5
14
4
8
0
14
3
7
5
15
4
7
5
14
2
a
0
15
4
B
0
8
0
16
8
8
0
14
2
7
5
14
4
7
5
15
1
7
5
18
8
7
O
14
0
7
0
14
7
7
5
15
8
7
0
15
5
7
O
14
7
7
5
16
0
7
5
15
2
S
0
1G
4
7
5
14
6
7
b
16
3
7
5
17
0
7
5
15
5
7
O
14
4
7
5
16
0
7
5
(4
S
8
0
15
5
7
5
17
1
8
0
16
2
7
5
15
0
7
5
16
1
7
0
14
a
7
5
15
6
7
5
16
9
7
5
16
5
8
0
16
3
8
0
15
9
7
5
15
6
8
0
16
1
8
0
14
2
8
0
16
1
8
0
16
4
8
0
16
4
7
5
13
2
7
5
15
4
8
O
17
1
-------
COAL PROPERTIES FROM DAILY COAL MIX
KI DC DEMONSTRATION PROJECT - BETHLEHEM STI
SPARROWS POINT. MARYLAND
VOLATILE FIXED
OBS
DATE
KQA
TUHN
PLANT
MATTER
CARBON
3 19
05/11/91
1282
7-3
B
28 .9
64 . a
320
05/12/91
1284
1 1-7
B
32 1
05/12/91
1264
7-3
B
28 . 7
65 .0
322
05/13/91
1284
11-7
B
323
05/13/91
1284
7-3
B
29.9
G4! 0
324
05/14/91
1284
11 -7
B
29.5
63 . 9
325
05/14/91
1284
7-3
B
29 .6
64 .0
326
05/15/91
1284
11-7
B
30.0
63.6
327
05/15/91
1284
7-3
B
31.1
62 .8
328
05/16/91
1284
11-7
B
29.6
63.6
329
05/16/91
1284
7-3
B
30.3
63.5
330
05/17/91
1284
1 1-7
B
30.7
63. i
331
05/17/91
1284 .
7-3
B
31 .2
62.3
332
05/18/91
1284
7-3
B
30.8
63 . 1
333
05/18/91
1284
3-11
B
30. i
63.7
334
05/19/91
1286
11-7
B
30.7
63.2
33b
05/19/91
1286
7-3
B
30.8
63 .0
336
05/20/91
1286
11-7
B
29.6
64 . 4
337
05/20/91
1286
7-3
B
29.4
64.5
338
05/21/91
128S
1 1-7
B
29.4
64.5
339
05/21/91
1286
7-3
B
29.0
64.9
340
05/22/91
1286
1 1-7
B
29.5
64 .3
34 1
05/22/91
1286
7-3
B
29 . 3
64 . 7
342
05/23/91
1286
1 1-7
B
29.5
64.3
343
05/23/91
1286
7-3
B
29.2
64.8
344
05/24/91
1286
11-7
B
29.4
64.4
345
05/24/91
1286
7-3
B
2 9.6
64. f
346
05/25/91
1286
1 1-7
B
29.6
64.2
347
05/26/91
1290
1 1-7
B
28.5
65.5
348
05/26/91
1290
7-3
B
29.7
64.2
349
05/27/91
129Q
7-3
B
29.6
64 .2
350
05/28/91
1 2 BO
11-7
B
30. 2
63 . 1
351
05/28/91
1290
7-3
B
29.9
63.8
352
05/29/91
1290
1 1-7
B
29 .2
64 .5
353
05/29/91
12 BO
7-3
B
3D 4
£3.2
354
05/30/91
1290
1 1-7
B
30.3
63.6
355
O5/30/91
12 SO
7-3
B
29.4
64.2
356
05/31/91
1290
1 1-7
B
29.6
64,3
357
05/31/91
1290
7-3
B
29. e
63 6
358
06/QI/91
1290
11-7
B
29.6
64 . 4
3b9
06/01/91
1 2 90
7-3
B
29.9
64.0
3GO
06/02/91
U92
11-7
B
29.6
64 . 4
36 1
06/02/9i
1292
7-3
8
30.0
64 .0
362
06/03/91
1292
11-7
B
29.6
63.6
363
06/03/91
1292
7-3
e
29.8
64 . 2
364
06/04/91
1292
11-7
B
29.5
64.7
365
06/04/91
1292
7-3
B
3O.0
64 . 3
366
06/05/91
1292
11-7
B
30. 1
63.9
3b7
06/05/91
1292
7-3
B
29 8
63. B
368
06/06/91
1292
11/
B
29.8
63 . 6
369
06/06/91
1292
7-3
B
29 .3
64 . 9
370
06/07/91
1292
11-7
6
29.7
63.7
37 1
0G/07/91
1232
7-3
B
29.9
64 .0
REPORTS
[EL CORPORATION
16:22 Tuesday, March 31, 1992
7
ASH
SULFUR
FSI
6 2
O 80
7.5
6.3
0.79
8.0
6.1
0.78
8 .0
6 . 6
0 . 79
8.Q
6.4
0.81
7.6
6.4
0.79
7.5
6.1-
0.78
8.0
6.6
0.83
7.5
6.2
0.80
8.0
6.2
0.75
8.0
6,5
0.80
7.5
6. i
0 . 76
S.O
6 2
0.78
8.0
6. 1
0.79
a.o
6.2
0.77
7.5
6.0
0.79
7.5
6. t
0. 79
7.5
6. 1
0. 79
7.5
6. 1
0.79
8.0
6.2
0.87
8.5
6.0
o.ao
8.0
6.2
0.79
8.0
6.0
O.S1
8.0
6.2
0.79
7.5
6.3
0.79
8.0
6 . 2
0.78
B.O
6.0
0.80
7.5
6 . 1
0.81
7.5
6 . 2
0.77
7.5
6.7
O. 79
7.5
6.3
0.80
B.O
6.3
0.82
7.5
6,4
0.79
8.0
6. 1
0.84
7.5
6 4
0.77
7.5
6. 1
0.77
7.5
6.4
0. 79
7.5
6.0
0.80
7.5
6. 1
0.80
7.0
GO
Q.82
a.o
6.0
0.80
7.5
6.8
0.77
7.5
6.0
o.ai
7.5
5.8
0.83
7.5
5 . 7
0.80
7.5
6.0
0. 79
7.5
6 4
0.79
7.0
6.6
O. 78
7 . 5
5.8
O.S1
7 .5
6.6
0.74
7.5
6. 1
0. 78
8.0
PCT PASSING
tOO MESH
15.2
16.6
15.4
16.8
14.7
16.2
15 .O
16.4
16.4
16.2
15.5
17.5
18.6
I7.fi
17.6
15.2
13.5
10.9
13.9
I I .9
13.5
1S.fi
9.7
15. 2
14.6
12.5
12.6
14.0
14 .9
16.8
15.0
14 .9
15.3
14.4
15.0
14.0
14 .O
14.8
15.5
14.6
16.2
10-6
19 . 1
15.2
13.7
15.0
12.9
13.2
15 a
13.2
14.0
-------
COAL PROPERTIES FROM DAILY COAL MIX REPORTS
KIDC DEMONSTRATION PROJECT - BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
SPARROWS POINT. MARYLAND
VOLATILE
FIXED
DBS
DATE
ROA
TURN
PLANT
MATTER
CARBON
ASH
SULFUR
372
06/06/91
1292
11-7
R
29.6
64 3
6. 1
0.83
373
06/06/91
1292
7-3
B
29.4
64.7
5.9
0.79
374
06/09/91
1296
11-7
B
29.5
63, 1
7.4
©. 79
375
06/O9/9!
1296
7-3
B
28.7
65.0
6.3
O. 78
376
06/10/91
1296
11-7
B
28.5
65 1
6.4
0.83
377
06/10/91
1296
7-3
B
28.7
65.0
€.3
0.81
378
06/11/91
1296
11-7
B
28.7
65.4
5.9
O. 82
379
06/11/91
1296
7-3
B
29. 1
65.0
5.9
O- 78
380
06/12/91
1296
11 7
B
28.7
64 .7
6.6
0.79
381
06/12/91
1296
7-3
B
28. 9
64 .7
6.4
0- 79
382
06/13/91
1296
11-7
B
29.0
64 .7
6.3
0.80
383
06/13/91
1296
7-3
B
28.7
64 .7
6.6
0.81
384
06/14/91
1296
11-7
B
28.9
64 ,9
6.2
0.78
385
06/14/91
1236
7-3
B
28.6
65 .0
6.4
0.83
388
06/15/91
1296
11-7
6
29 . 4
64 .3
6.3
0.79
387
06/15/91
1296
7-3
B
29.7
64 1
6.2
0.80
3BB
06/16/9 1
1298
i 1-7
B
30 .9
62.6
6 .0
0. 76
389
06/ 16/9 1
1298
7-3
B
31 .5
62 2
6.3
0. 74
390
06/17/9 1
1298
11-7
B
29.5
64.9
5.6
0. 76
39 I
06/17/91
1296
7 3
6
29.7
64.7
5.6
0.77
392
06/18/91
1298
11-7
B
30. 1
64 1
6.0
0.77
393
06/18/91
1290
7~3
B
29.7
64 .9
5.6
0. 75
394
06/19/91
1298
11-7
a
28.3
65 .3
6.4
O.BO
395
06/19/91
1298
7-3
B
28.7
64,9
6.4
0.85
396
06/20/91
1298
11-7
B
29.3
64.4
6.3
0. 79
397
06/2O/9I
1298
7-3
B
28.6
65.2
6.2
O.SO
39B
06/21/91
1298
11-7
B
28.8
65. 1
6. 1
0.80
399
06/21/91
1298
7-3
B
29.5
64. 3
6.2
O.BO
400
06/22/91
1298
11-7
B
28. 7
65.2
6. 1
O.SO
401
06/23/91
1302
11-7
6
29.3
64.5
6.2
0.79
402
06/23/91
1302
7-3
e
28.7
65. i
6.2
0.81
403
06/24/91
1302
11-7
B
28.6
65.0
6.4
0.80
404
06/24/91
1 3Q2
7-3
B
29.0
64.7
6.3
0.78
405
06/25/91
(302
" 11-7
B
28.3
65.4
6.3
0.62
406
06/25/91
1302
7-3
B
28.2
65.6
6.2
0.85
407
06/26/91
1302
11-7
B
29.0
64.8
6.2
0.78
408
06/26/91
1302
7-3
&
29.3
64.4
6.3
0.79
409
06/27/91
1302
11-7
B
28.7
65.0
K.3
0.79
4 10
06/27/91
1302
7-3
B
28 . 4
65.2
6.4
0. 79
4 11
06/28/91
1302
t 1 -7
B
28.5
65 .3
6.2
0-79
412
06/28/91
1302
7-3
B
28.4
65.3
6.3
0.79
4 13
06/29/91
1302
t 1-7
8
28. 5
65. 4
6. 1
0.81
4 14
06/29/91
1302
7-3
6
28.5
65 5
6.0
0.87
415
06/30/91
1304
11-7
B
28.6
65.2
6.2
0.77
4 Ifi
06/30/91
S304
7-3
B
27 . 7
66 2
6 1
O.SO
417
07/01/91
1304
11-7
e
28.4
65.5
6. 1
0.79
418
07/01/91
1304
7-3
B
27 . 7
66.0
6.3
0.81
4 19
07/02/91
1304
11-7
B
28. 7
65 3
6.0
0.81
420
07/03/91
1304
11-7
B
27.9
66. i
6.0
0.77
421
07/03/91
1304
7-3
B
28.8
64.8
6.4
0.80
422
07/04/91
1304
14-7
B
28.3
65. 3
6.4
0.79
423
07/04/91
1304
7-3
B
28.7
64.8
6.5
0.77
424
07/05/91
1304
11-7
B
28.2
65.7
6. 1
0.80
16:22 Tuesday, March 31. 1992 8
PCT PASSING
FSI lOO MESH
7.5 13.3
7.5 12.9
7.5 . 13.7
a.O 14.6
a.o is n
7.5 15.0
7.5 14.8
7.5 16.6
7.5 15.1
B.O 16.1
7.5 16.0
8.0 17.0
S.O 16.3
7.5 16.1
7.5 13.6
7.5 14.0
7.5 12.4
7.5 14.4
8.0 14.8
7.5 16.4
7.5 14.8
8.0 16.4
7.5 14 4
8.0 17.S
7.5 IG.t
7.5 IT.2
B.O 16.2
7.5 16.8
7.5 14 4
8.0 18.4
S.O 18.4
a.O 15.2
7.5 17.1
B.O 18.0
7.0 15.6
7.5 16.4
B.O ISO
7.5 17 0
8.0 15 6
7.5 17.6
7.5 15.6
8.0 22.0
B.O 17.6
B.O 16.4
7.5 16.4
7.5 16.1
7.5 16.8
7.5 14.5
7.5 17.0
7.5 15 5
7.5 17.0
7.5 16,5
7.b 14.2
-------
COAL PROPERTIES FROM DAILY COAL MIX
K1UC DEMONSTRATION PROJECT - BETHLEHEM STI
SPARKUVS KU1NI, MARYLAND
QBS
DATE
425
07/05/91
426
07/06/91
427
07/06/91
428
07/07/91
429
07/07/91
430
07/08/91
431
07/08/91
432
07/09/91
433
07/09/91
434
07/10/91
435
07/10/91
436
07/11/91
437
07/<
-------
SZ-N
UIOIOlOhJIOfOUUUM-i-'-'^->^^-k^^OOOOOOOOOO^lD:--QO(DUB]C>]>JO0:^uifr^uuN>igj^oo^iPO:(o^»JC>i^uiirJ>x>uuiou«rt
ss\N'v.\,VS\S\NSNNS.\,VSSsvVVWVV\N\VS\SV\SN\\NW\\\SNSSN\1\S
Xici£ioiD(fi(ttf(O^SOU(tKtfVDIS(CICtfK(£(PISItUiPWlS(C(CVI£ICOIfU)!PVy>UiUJO(SUl£(CI£lfiV
UUUg^mUUUUUUULUUUUUUUUUUUUIkUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
iCN:ro>orv:N:k:roro,vj»oforo^rorj'o\iroNj%3rjrvfvWs-s:sirjKJN^N;fc-t-i-'-'—-' — — — -
^ffurOl^UUUUUU^UUUUUUUOOOCOOOOOOOOOCSSSN-g-JxJ-lsl^-J^^^UUUUUU
— — -i — —
U)iCJiU!lCJtWlWIW
—¦ -J »J ¦-• ¦
U I U I CO I I
O 1 U I U i
hi I CJ I W I C£ I
COlECOIDCJnCDaiCJSnJnJODaiOOOOOCIJCDDOaJnJnJCGnCOIDEODDCOCOniEEDCOECOJDIDDCIDOOEIBJtDCDEDCOBOBOBJCD©
s
>
UUNNfjrOMICIOIOIOUUUD^IOUUUUUUNJMrOMIOUIOMUIOUUUUUUUUUUfOIOUUUVUMUlO H
O(O(C(C(DO9(OIC(£l^U>OOUlOOtfO^-k-'DO(DK!BD(C(e(S(DOIDOlOO^^-(D-f-'(0(dOOO3VI0(OU H
us)(Ou'*i0cnuaio(j)O-'^idu^U7»rottODUiE0C(BUAU(OUio-'io^-'Oiou0>oui«uisio«j'
&)G>Ci&>ClC*&*&>0)ViB\ttiB)(Fia>ai6')C>(riQ)Q)(T>0&i7>G>G>9>&ifr3)(F>&&
^ m i.^ vi ir ij d tj A ^ ki rn ib u m hi A a fn ki it n m ki k ^ m rn (> kwn a i w.^ ^ i r.t r.i in k m
-*^tDaBes^u^Oin&0''Su>i^>J^'>JO^K)(niPH9>N)9)^(ouK)0>t9io&«iumbN)
Z r
cn
-l "C
r
» 30
>
> c
2
h *e
—• m
t/iQn
•O 2 H
> »-
;o ^ m
<
» 3D trt
s ©
O O
>
i—
C t. -n
H
>
in m x
H
•H
r> e
n
H
'QiS
»r~
o
m
HH | O
2 »
HOSt-
- 171 I-
-1 <
O -n
<3 X
> >-<
.» r~ n
50 X
30 m O
CD m
< I >
o c
r m r
z
> 3
Z 3
~ |/> w
H X
m to
r~ m
>
¦D
1/1
O O
I
O 70
73 H
*0
O
3D
tfl
>
c
H
r
-n
o
LncuiaiOiJi^fiOO^OCOCO;*UiL,yo^yi?iOClOOy'J1cs,^<^|Jiy|yy,''"uiO<-"'-"OOuioiCOcunfly>0
QDd;-'go^0iooo^oO(PO9iS)AB>j^(Tiufou->Ma-'U)i0e^^e»^->wo^roQU0ioui^*'(ruus]ioin
o
O "0
>
3 t/>
m i/>
a
p>
<
o
-------
COAL PROPERTIES FROM DAILY COAL MIX REPORTS
KIDC DEMONSTRATION PROJECT - BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
SPARROWS POINT. MARYLAND
VOLATILE
FIXED
DBS
DATE
ROA
TURN
PLANT
MATTER
CARBON
ASH
SULFUR
531
08/27/91
1326
7-3
e
29.7
64. 1
6.2
0.78
532
Q8/2B/91
1326
11-7
6
29.8
64.5
5 , 7
0.79
633
08/28/91
1326
7-3
B
30.7
63.2
6 . i
0.76
534
08/29/91
1326
11-7
e
30.3
63.6
6. %
0.78
535
08/29/91
1326
7-3
8
30.5
63 2
6.3
0.77
536
08/30/91
1326
11-7
B
29.9
64. 2
5.9
0.78
b3?
08/30/91
1326
7-3
B
30-5
63. 4
6. 1
0-77
538
08/31/91
1326
11-7
B
30. 3
63. 2
6.5
O. 79
539
08/31/91
1326
7-3
B
29.7
63.5
6.8
0.79
540
09/01/91
1329
11-7
B
3Q.O
63.9
6.1
0.77
54 1
09/01/91
1329
7-3
B
30.2
63.7
6. 1
0.70
fa42
09/02/91
1329
1 1-7
B
29.9
63.6
6.5
0.76
543
09/02/91
1329
7-3
B
29.S
64.1
6. i
0.77
544
09/03/91
1329
S 1-7
B
31 .2
62 . S
G.O
0-76
545
09/03/91
1329
7-3
B
30.7
63.0
6.3
0.73
546
09/04/91
1329
11-7
B
31 .0
63. 1
5.9
0.77
547
09/04/91
1329
7-3
B
3C.2
03.6
6 . 2
0.80
548
• 09/05/91
1329
11-7
B
29.3
63. 9
6 . B
0.83
549
09/05/91
1329
7 3
B
30.3
63.6
6. 1
0.80
550
09/06/91
1329
11-7
B
29.2
64.5
6 , 3
0.76
551
09/06/91
1329
7-3
B
30.5
60.2
9.3
O. 78
552
03/07/91
1320
11-7
B
30.B
63. 1
6 . 1
0.75
553
09/07/91
1329
7-3
D
30.2
63.8
6.0
0.73
554
09/08/91
1331
11-7
B
29. 1
65.0
5.9
0.81
555
09/08/91
(33 t
7-3
B
30. 1
63.4
6.5
0. 78
556
09/09/91
1331
11-7
B
29.9
64.4
5.7
0.79
557
09/09/91
1331
7-3
B
30.4
64 .0
5.6
0,78
559
09/10/91
1331
11 -7
B
29.7
64-8
5.5
0 . 79
5b9
09/10/91
1331
7-3
B
30.8
62.9
6.3
0.79
560
09/11/91
1331
i 1-7
B
30. 1
64 .0
5.9
O. 76
561
09/11/91
1331
7- ?j
B
30.0
64.3
5.7
O. 77
562
09/12/91
1331
14-7
B
29.8
64.0
6.2
0.78
563
09/12/91
1331
7-3
B
29.9
64 .0
6 . 1
0.74
564
09/13/91
1331
11-7
B
26. 1
65.4
6.5
0.78
565
09/13/91
1331
7-3
B
26.5
65.0
6.5
O. 77
566
09/14/91
1331
11-7
B
30.7
62 .4
6.9
0.78
567
09/14/91
1331
7-3
B
31.4
62.5
6. 1
0.77
56B
09/15/9 1
1333
1 1-7
B
29.9
63.9
6.2
O. 80
569
09/15/91
1333
7-3
6
30.0
63.9
5- 1
0.80
570
09/16/91
1333
11-7
B
29.6
64 .5
5.9
0-79
hf 1
09/16/9 1
(333
7-3
6
29.6
64.3
ti. 1
O.V9
572
09/17/m
1 i -7
n
3D. 5
63.6
5.9
0.75
573
09/17/91
1333
7-3
B
30.2
63.9
5.9
0.76
574
09/18/91
1333
11-7
B
28.6
65.4
6.0
0.80
575
09/18/91
1333
7-3
B
29.3
64 .4
6.3
0.81
576
09/19/91
1333
11-7
B
29. 1
64,7
6 ; 2
0.79
577
09/19/91
1333
7-3
B
29.6
64.5
5.9
0.80
576
09/20/91
1333
1 1-7
B
28.2
65.6
6.2
0.78
579
09/20/91
1333
7-3
B
28.4
65.3
6.3
0.76
580
09/21/91
1333
11-7
B
28.5
65.5
6.0
0.79
581
09/21/91
1333
7-3
B
28. 9
64 .4
G. 7
0.75
562
09/22/91
1335
11-7
B
28.9
65.2
5.9
0.77
583
09/22/91
1335
7-3
B
29.8
63 .9
6.3
0.80
16:22 Tuesday, March 31, 1992 I!
POT PASSING
FS*
100 MESH
7.5
14.8
7.5
15.0
7.5
14.6
7.5
17.1
7.5
15. 1
7.0
15.6
7.5
, 15. 1
8.0
11 .8
7.5
16.6
7.5
13.6
7.5
15.5
7.5
14. 1
7.5
16. 1
8.0
12. B
7.5
13.9
7.5
14.4
7.5
15.8
7.5
15.2
7.5
14.6
7.5
15.4
7.5
15.6
7.5
12 .0
7.5
13. 1
8.0
14.6
7 . 5
15.0
7.5
16.0
7.5
15.2
7.5
11.2
7.5
16.0
7.5
14.0
7.5
14 . 9
7.5
13.3
7.0
14.2
7.5
14.6
7.5
15. 1
S.O
13.9
7.5
11.6
7.5
16.4
7.5
15.6
7.5
13. 1
7.5
15. 1
7.5
14 . 3
7.5
15.1
a.o
15.6
7.5
16.4
8.0
17.4
7.5 •
13.9
7.5
17.9
8.0
14.8
7.5
15.2
7.5
14.8
7.5
15.6
8.0
14.6
-------
COAL PROPERTIES FROM DAILY COAL MIX REPORTS
KIDC DEMONSTRATION PROJECT - BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
SPARROWS POINT. MARYLAND
16:22 Tuesday, March 31. 1992 12
VOLATILE
FIXED
PCT PASSING
OBS
DATE
RQA
TURN
PLANT -
MATTER
CARBON
ASH
SULFUR
FSI
100 MESH
584
09/23/91
1335
11-7
B
30.3
63.3
6 .4
O.B1
7,5
14 6
btib
09/23/91
1335
7-3
6
31.3
62.4
6.3
0.79
7.5
14.8
586
09/24/91
1335
1 1-7
B
29 .6
63.8
6 .6
0.75
7 ,5
14.6
587
09/24/91
1335
7-3
B
30.6
63.4
SO
0 , 74
8.0
13.9
58B
09/25/91
1335
1 1-7
B
31 .6
62.5
5.9
0,74
8.0
14.6
589
09/25/91
1335
7-3
B
30. a
63.3
5.9
0,74
8.0
15.3
590
09/26/91
1335
11-7
B
25 .3
64.0
6,7
0.79
7.0
15.6
59 1
09/26/91
1335
7-3
B
31 .0
62 .4
6.6
0 . 76
7 , 5
15.2
592
09/27/91
1335
11-7
B
30.3
62.8
6.9
0.74
7.5
15.2
593
09/27/91
1335
7-3
B
31.1
62.8
6. 1
0.76
7.5
15.0
594
<>9/28/91
1335
11-7
e
30.8
62.9
6.3
0.76
7 . 5
14 .O
595
09/28/91
1335
7-3
B
29.3
64 1
6.6
0.79
8.0
15.0
596
09/29/91
1337
11-7
B
28.0
65. 1
6.9
0.83
8.0
13.4
597
09/29/91
1337
7-3
B
28.3
65.2
6.5
0.85
6.0
14.6
596
00/30/91
1337
1 1-7
B
28.6
64 .9
6.9
0.77
7.5
12.6
599
09/30/91
1337
7-3
B
28.2
€5.2
6.6
0.82
8.0
14.7
600
10/01/91
1337
1 1 -7
B
30.0
63.e
6 . 2
0. 78
7 . 5
16.8
601
10/01/91
1337
7-3
B
29.9
63.8
6.3
0.79
8.0
15.2
602
10/02/91
1337
1 1 -7
B
30.0
63.9
6. 1
0.83
8 >0
14.3
603
10/02/91
1337
7-3
B
30.9
62.9
6.2
0.82
7.5
12. 1
-v S04
10/03/91
1337
11-7
B
28.3
65.6
6. 1
0.82
8.0
17.6
605
10/03/91
1 337
7-3
B
29 .O
64 .9
6. 1
0.82
7.5
16.4
606
10/04/91
1 337
11 -7
B
29. 1
64.5
6.4
0.79
7.5
16.5
Jf
607
10/04/91
1337
7-3
B
29.7
64.0
6.3
0.82
B.O
17.2
608
10/05/91
1337
11-7
6
29.4
64. 2
6.4
0.81
8.0
16.4
!"0
609
10/05/91
1337
7-3
B
30.2
63.3
6.5
0.81
8.0
17. 1
>
610
10/06/91
1339
1 1 -7
B
29.5
64. 1
6.4
0.80
7.5
15.1
61 1
10/06/91
1339
7-3
B
28 . 2
65.5
6.2
0.76
7.5
18 .8
612
10/07/91
1339
11-7
B
30. 1
63.5
6.4
o.ai
7.5
17.2
613
10/07/91
1339
7-3
B
29.4
64.4
6.2
0.83
7.0
16.8
614
10/08/91
1339
11-7
B
29.8
63.5
6.7
0.79
8.0
17.6
G15
10/08/91
1339
7-3
B
30.8
62.9
6.3
0.76
7.5
18. 1
616
10/09/91
1339
1 1 7
B
29.2
64 .4
6.4
0.79
7.5
13.8
£ 17
10/09/91
1339
7-3
B
29 . 5
64 1
6.4
0.79
7.5
13.2
£18
10/10/91
1339
11-7
B
30.4
63.6
6 .O
0.74
8.0
13.5
619
10/10/91
1339
7 3
B
30.3
63. 8
5.9
O. 76
8.0
17.6
620
10/11/91
1339
11-7
B
30.9
63.4
5.7
0.74
7 . S
14 .6
621
10/11/91
1339
7-3
B
31 .6
62.5
5.9
0. 73
7.5
14.8
622
10/12/91
1339
1 1 -7
B
30.2
63.5
6 .3
0.79
7 5
15.3
623
10/12/9 I
1339
7-3
B
29 .1
63.7
6 .6
o.ao
8.0
14.8
62-4
10/13/91
13-44
1 1 7
b
30.4
64 .O
5.6
0. 78
7 . 5
17.3
62b
10/13/91
1344
7-3
B
30 B
63 6
5.6
0. 76
7 5
15 ,S
626
10/14/91
1344
11-7
B
29 .8
63 .6
6.6
0.78
7,5
15.8
627
10/14/91
1344
7-3
B
29.6
63.7
6.7
0. BO
7.5
14.4
€26
10/16/91
1344
7-3
B
28 .2
64 .9
6.9
G . BO
fl 0
13.2
629
10/10/91
134 4
11-7
B
2S .9
65 .2
5.9
0-B1
8,0
15.6
630
10/16/91
1344
7-3
U
2S .9
64 .9
6.2
0,81
8.0
15.9
631
10/17/91
134 4
1 1-7
B
30.6
63 4
6.0
0.77
7 . 5
14.8
632
10/17/91
1344
7-3
B
31 .3
62.7
6.0
0.78
8.0
14 .b
633
tO/18/91
1344
1 1-7
B
ao 7
63 . 1
6.2
0. 76
8.0
15.4
634
10/18/9 J
1344
7-3
B
29 .7
64 0
6.3
0.75
8.0
14 .8
635
10/19/91
134 4
11-7
B
29. 1
64.6
6.3
0.83
B.O
15. 1
636
10/19/9 1
1344
7-3
B
3 1.2
62.5
6.3
0.77
7 .5
15.4
-------
COAL PROPERTIES FROM DAILV CQAL MIX REPORTS
KIDC DEMONSTRATION PROJECT - BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORA!1 OH
SPARROWS POINT, MARYLAND
VOLATILE
FIXED
OBS
DATE
ROA
TURN
PLANT
MATTER
CARBON
ASH
SULFUR
637
10/20/91
1346
1 1-7
B
29.9
64 . 1
6.0
0.79
638
10/20/91
1346
7-3
B
29.3
64.6
6. 1
0.79
639
10/21/91
1346
1 1 -7
0
30.2
63.3
6.5
0.80
640
10/21/91
1346
7-3
B
30.3
€3. 1
6.6
0.83
641
10/22/91
1346
11-7
B
28.4
64.9
6.7
0.84
642
10/22/91
1346
7-3
6
28. 8
64 8
6.4
O. 79
643
10/23/91
1346
11-7
8
27. 1
66.9
6.0
0.80
644
10/23/91
1346
7-3
B
27.4
66.3
6.3
0.79
645
10/24/91
1346
1 1-7
8
28.9
64.7
6.4
0-76
646
10/24/91
1346
7 3
B
30.4
63.2
6.3
0.74
647
10/25/91
1346
11-7
B
28.6
65.0
6.4
0.83
646
10/25/91
1346
7-3
B
29.9
63.8
6.3
0.75
649
10/26/91
1346
11-7
B
28. 1
65.9
6.0
0.78
650
10/26/91
1346
7-3
B
27.6
66.3
6.1
0.80
651
10/27/91
1348
1 1-7
B
30.6
62 .8
6.6
0.81
652
10/27/91
1348
7-3
B
30.5
63.5
6.0
0.79
6^3
10/28/91
1348
1 1 -7
B
28.6
65.3
6. 1
0.8 1
654
10/28/91
1348
7-3
B
30. 1
63.5
6.4
O. 78
655
10/29/91
1348
11-7
B
30.4
63.3
6.3
0. 78
€56
IO/29/9 i
1348
7-3
B
30.0
63.9
6. 1
0.80
657
10/30/91
1346
11-7
B
29.9
63.9
6.2
0.79
658
10/30/91
1348
7-3
B
29.4
64.5
6.1
0.78
659
10/31/91
1348
11-7
B
30.2
63.7
6.1
O. 76
660
10/31/91
1348
7-3
B
30.0
63.5
6.5
0.79
66
11/01/91
1348
11-7
B
27.8
65.8
6.4
O. BO
662
11/01/91
1348
7-3
B
29.8
64.8
6.4
O. 8 1
663
11/02/91
1348
11-7
B
26.7
64.9
6.4
0.79
664
11/02/91
1348
7-3
B
29. 9
63.7
6.4
O. 76
665
11/03/91
1350
11-7
B
29.6
63.7
6.7
0.77
6C£
11/03/91
1350
7-3
B
29.7
63.7
6.6
O. BO
667
11/04/91
1350
1 1-7
a
29.9
63.9
€.2
0.79
668
11/04/91
1 3 50
7-3
B
30.5
63.2
6.3
O. 78
669
11/05/91
1350
1 1 -7
B
29.8
64 .2
6.0
0.78
070
11/05/91
1350
7 3
B
30. 9
63 .2
6.0
0.79
671
11/06/91
1350
1 1 -7
B
30. 1
63.8
6. 1
0.75
672
11/06/91
1350
7-3
B
29.6
64.3
6. 1
0.78
673
1l/OV/91
13 bO
1 1 -7
fcJ
31.0
62 .9
6. 1
O. 76
674 '
11/07/91
1350
7-3
B
30.2
63 . 7
6 . 1
O. 76
675
11/08/91
1350
1 1-7
B
30. 1
63.5
6.4
0.78
€76
11/08/91
1350
7-3
B
30. t
63 . 7
6.2
0-78
677
t1/09/91
1350
11-7
B
31 .2
62 .7
6. 1
O. 75
676
11/09/91
1 350
7-3
B
30.5
63.4
€ . 1
O. 77
679
11/10/91
1352
11-7
B
33.0
61 .0
€.0
O. 76
6 DO
11/10/91
1352
7-3
B
31.5
62. 1
6.4
Q-.76
681
11/11/91
1352
1 1 -7
B
32.3
61 .6
6. 1
0.74
682
11/11/91
1352
7-3
8
32 . 4
61.2
€.4
O. 76
683
11/12/91
1352
117
B
29.9
63.4
6.7
0.77
604
11/12/91
1352
7-3
B
29 . 5
64 . 4
6. 1
O. 78
685
11/13/91
1352
11-7
B
31 .6
62.4
6.0
0.77
636
11/13/91
1352
7-3
B
30. 7
63. 1
6.2
0.77
68/
11/14/91
1352
1 1-7
B
29. 4
64 ,6
6.0
0.77
688
11/14/91
1352
7-3
B
29.0
65.0
6.0
0.75
689
11/15/91
1352
11-7
B
31 .6
62. 3
6 - 1
0.75
16:22 Tuesday. March 31. 1992 13
PCT PASSING
FSI
100 MESH
7.5
14.7
7.5
16.3
7 .5
17 . 3
7 .5
16.5
7.5
7 .0
7 .b
18.0
7.5
17 . 2
8.0
15.5
7 .
13.2
7.Si
16.7
7 .5
17.4
7.5
14. t
8.0
13. 1
8.0
14,5
7.5
14.7
7.5
12.0
7.5
13.3
7.0
15. 1
7.5
14.4
7.5
15.3
8.0
14.6
7.5
14.5
7.5
15.2
8.0
14. 1
8.0
15.2
7.5
15.0
8.0
16.9
7.5
16.0
7.5
16.6
8.0
16.9
7.5
15.2
8.0
15. 1
7.5
15 , 8
8.0
16 .0
8.0
15 , 7
8.0
14.9
8.0
14.4
7.5
14.4
8.0
13. B
7.5
15.6
7 .5
15 . 1
7 , 5
13.6
7.5
12 . I
8.0
12.4
8.0
12.3
8.0
13. 1
8.0
12.6
8.0
12.5
7.5
13.4
8.0
14 . 1
8,0
17.6
8.0
12 .8
-------
COAL PROPERTIES FROM DAILY COAL MIX REPORTS
KIDC DEMONSTRATION PROJECT - BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
SPARROWS POINT. MARYLAND
16:22 Tuesday, March 31, 1992 14
VOLATILE FIXED PCT PASSING
OBS
DATE
BOA
TURN
PLANT
matter
CARBON
ASH
SULFUR
FSI
100 MESH
690
1 1/15/91
1352
7-3
B
29.4
64 4
6.2
o.eo
B.O
13.9
691
11/16/91
1352
11-7
B
30.7
63.0
6.3
0.74
7.5
14 . 1
692
11/16/91
1352
7-3
B
29.9
63.9
6.2
0.7S
7.5
15.2
693
t 1/17/91
1354
11-7
B
31 1
62.9
6.0
O. 74
tt.O
16 . 1
694
1 1/17/91
1354
7-3
B
30.6
63.4
6.0
0.75
B.O
13.8
695
1 1/18/91
1354
\ 1-7
B
31.7
62 2
G. 1
0.75
7.5
13.9
696
11/18/9 1
1354
7-3
B
30. 8
63 2
6.0
0.75
7.0
16.9
697
11/19/91
1354
11-7
B
29 5
64 3
6.2
O. 76
8.0
14 .9
698
11/19/91
1354
7-3
B
30.2
63.8
6.0
0.75
7.5
14.6
699
11/20/91
1354
1 1-7
B
29 .O
65.0
0 0
O , 75
0.0
15.6
700
11/20/91
1354
7-3
B
30.0
64.0
6.0
0.75
6 .O
15.0
701
11/21/91
1354
11-7
B
30.6
63.0
6.4
0.76
8.0
15.6
702
1 1/21/91
1354
7-3
B
30. 2
63.a
6.3
O 74
so
16.0
703
11/22/91
1354
11-7
B
30.0
64.0
6.0
0.77
a.o
16.2
704
11/22/91
1354
7-3
B
30 6
63. 1
6.3
0.77
7 .5
15.9
705
1 1/23/91
1354
1 1-7
B
30. 2
63.7
6. 1
0. 77
7.5
14. 3
706
1 1/23/91
1 354
7-3
B
31.0
62.7
6.3
0.75
7.5
14.7
• ro
-so I
-------
COAL PROPERTIES FROM QUALITY COAL HANDLING REPORTS
KIDC DEMONSTRATION PROJECT - BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
SPARROWS POINT, MARYLAND
16:22 Tuesday, March 31, 1992
15
BULK
PULV.
%
OBS
DATE
DENSITY
% -1/6"
H20
1
12/01/90
47.96
78.93
6.82
2
12/02/90
47.95
76.91
6 .60
3
12/03/90
47.94
76 68
6.87
4
12/04/90
4®.07
79.00
7.14
5
12/05/90
47 .97
78.67
7. 12
6
12/06/90
47.97
78.88
7.08
7
12/07/90
47.99
76.85
7 .07
a
I2/O8/90
4&.03
78.67
6.85
9
12/09/90
48. 10
78.92
7 . 13
1Q
12/10/90
4fl.07
78.71
6.79
11
12/11/90
47 .96
76 .96
7.35
12
12/12/90
47 . SB
78.83
7.07
13
12/13/90
47.99
78.99
7. 17
14
12/14/90
48.06
79.00
6.65
15
12/15/90
48.00
78.9!
€ .85
16
12/16/30
46.03
76.77
7 .20
17
12/17/90
46. 10
79.15
6.78
18
12/16/90
48.06
78.64
7.34
19
12/19/90
4a.Ob
78.84
7 .55
20
12/20/90
47.9a
78.67
7. 15
2 1
12/21/90
4a.01
78.88
7 .46
22
12/22/90
48 .01
78 . BO
7 .60
23
12/23/90
47.99
78.95
7.42
24
12/24/90
47 .91
78 . 74
7 .44
25
12/25/90
48. OS
78 .85
7.35
26
12/26/90
4B.09
7B.74
7.65
27
12/27/90
47.08
78.72
7.65
28
12/28/90
47.95
76.88
6. 14
29
12/29/90
47.94
78.90
8.75
30
12/30/90
47.90
78 .54
8.35
31
12/31/90
47.97
78.73
7 .93
32
01/01/91
47 .91
78.82
7.98
33
01/02/91
47 .91
78.75
7 .98
34
01/03/91
47.88
78.85
7 .84
35
01/04/91
47.92
78.72
7.52
36
01/05/91
47.91
79. 13
7 .35
37
01/06/91
47.67
79. 17
7.34
36
01/07/91
47.96
76.85
9.29
39
01/08/91
47.91
78 .6b
8 .50
40
01/09/91
47 .89
78.58
7.84
4 1
01/10/9 1
47 .93
78 .65
7 .64
42
01/11/91
47.98
78 .66
8 . 12
43
0 J / 12/91
4 7.95
78.81
9. 16
44
01/13/91
47 .99
78.58
a.35
45
01/14/91
48.05
78 .59
7.70
46
01/15/91
48.38
78.72
8.55
47
01/16/91
47.97
70.59
8.73
48
01/17/91
48.00
78.54
8.38
49
01/18/91
47,90
78.62
8.63
50
01/19/91
47.91
78.60
7.67
51
01/20/91
47.91
79. 15
7 .83
52
01/21/91
47.92
78.73
7.42
53
01/22/91
48.04
78.94
a. 70
-------
LUAL PRUPERTICS FROM QUALITY CUAL HANDLING REPORTS
KlDC DEMONSTRATION PROJECT BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
SPARROWS POINT, MARYLAND
16:22 Tuesday, March 31, 1992 16
BULK
PliLV.
%
OBS
DATE
DENSITY
% -1/8"
H20
54
01/23/9*
47.94
79.80
7 .77
55
O1/24/91
48 .00
79.09
7 ,88
56
01/25/91
47 .98
78 .95
6.94
57
01/26/9!
48 06
79. 12
7 .43
58
01/27/91
47.86
78.67
7.4 1
59
01/28/91
47 .98
78.64
7 .30
tiO
01/29/91
48.01
7H.7 1
7 .75
61
01/30/91
47 .85
79. 14
7.74
62
01/31/91
48.08
78.67
6.93
63
02/01/91
47 .98
78.85
7 .60
64
02/02/91
48.00
78.83
7 - 13
65
02/03/9 t
47 .93
78.85
7 .25
GG
02/04/91
47.89
78.6b
7 .SB
67
02/05/91
47.89
78.33
7.25
66
02/06/91
47.88
79. 13
7.25
69
02/07/91
48 .00
78 . 79
7 .53
70
02/08/91
47.95
78.66
7 .85
7 1
02/09/91
47.96
78.62
6.90
72
02/<0/91
48.02
78 .65
7.25
73
02/1t/St
48.04
78 61
6.93
74
02/12/91
47.96
78.70
6.80
75
02/13/91
47.90
78.63
6.58
76
02/14/91
47.94
78.62
7.04
77
02/15/91
48.00
79.44
7 .00
7B
02/16/91
47.89
79.20
6.45
79
02/17/9!
48. 10
78.89
6.80
80
02/18/91
47.90
78 . 83
6 . 75
ai
02/19/91
47.96
78 .92
6.63
82
02/20/91
47.90
78.92
6.57
as
02/21/91
47 .86
79 10
6.55
84
02/22/91
47.91
79 14
6.55
B5
02/23/91
47 .92
78.74
6.55
86
02/24/91
48 .00
78.85
6.58
87
02/25/91
47 .94
79. 10
6.55
66
02/26/91
48.22
79.06
6.76
89
02/27/91
48 . 16
79.01
6 .86
90
02/28/91
47.99
78.77
7 .01
91
03/01/91
47-92
78.79
6.97
92
03/02/91
47.ao
78.61
6.65
93
03/03/91
47.87
79.22
6.97
34
03/04/Q1
47.95
78 .81
7 .53
95
03/05/91
48.03
78.74
6.90
96
03/06/91
48.01
78.58
6.95
97
03/07/91
47 .96
76.86
6 .94
96
03/08/91
48.02
78.58
6.67
99
03/09/91
48.06
78.99
7 .48
100
03/10/91
47.84
78.70
6.83
101
03/11/91
47.96
78.90
6.92
102
03/12/91
47 .93
79.04
6.97
103
03/13/91
47.96
79. 11
6.99
104
03/14/91
48 05
79. 18
6.08
105
03/15/91
47.85
79. 11
7 .64
106
03/16/91
47.83
79.04
7 .34
-------
COAL PROPERTIES FROM QUALITY COAL HANDLING REPORTS
KIDC DEMONSTRATION PROJECT - BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
SPARROWS POINT, MARYLAND
16:22 Tuesday, March 31, 1992 17
BULK
PULV.
%
OBS
DATE
DENSITY
% -1/8H
H20
107
03/17/91
47.95
78.81
7 .40
108
03/18/91
47.97
78.70
7 .95
109
03/19/91
4 7 .93
78.72
a . 82
110
03/20/91
47 .99
76.89
7 .84
111
03/21/91
47 .86
79. 18
7 .77
112
03/22/91
47 ,90
78.66
7 .60
113
03/23/91
47 .91
78 .59
8.30
1 14
03/24/91
47.92
78.62
8. 70
115
03/25/91
48 . 10
78.71
9.46
116
03/26/91
47 .82
78.56
9.23
117
03/27/91
47 .84
76.85
9.81
118
03/28/91
47 .99
78.83
9.28
I IS
03/29/91
47 .94
78.58
8.68
120
03/30/91
47.89
78 .58
B .81
121
03/31/91
47.91
_ 78.57
9.01
122
04/01/91
47 .85
79.28
8.90
823
04/O2/91
4B.01
79.70
8 .05
124
04/03/91
47.93
78.85
7 .45
125
04/04/91
47.84
79 .03
8.67
126
04/07/91
47.89
78. 6B
7,55
127
04/08/91
47.88
78 . 76
7 .24
126
04/09/91
47 .83
78 . 79
7 .69
129
04/10/91
47.81
78.68
7 .47
13G
04/11/91
4? .90
78.72
6.95
131
04/12/91
47.97
78. 69
7 . 30
132
04/13/91
133
04/14/91
48.00
78 .57
7 . 74
134
04/15/91
48. OO
78 . 57
7 .74
135
04/16/91
48.00
78 , 57
7.74
136
04/17/91
48. OO
78.57
7.74
13?
04/18/91
48.OO
78 , 57
7.74
136
04/19/91
48. OO
78.57
7.74
139
04/20/91
48.00
78 . 57
7.74
140
04/21/91
48.OO
78.57
7.74
14 1
04/22/91
48.00
78.57
7.74
142
04/23/91
48.OO
78 .57
7.74
143
04/24/91
48.OO
78.57
7 .74
144
04/25/91
48.00
78.57
7 .74
145
04/26/91
48 .OO
78 .57
7.74
146
04/27/91
48.00
78 ,57
7.74
147
Q*J/2tt/91
48.00
78 . 57
7 . 74
148
04/29/91
4B 00
78 57
7 74
149
04/30/91
48. 10
78 .65
8.09
1bO
05/01/91
47.87
78.85
8 . 08
15 1
05/02/91
47 . 94
78 6G
7 .53
152
OD/03/91
47.92
78.73
7.50
153
05/04/91
4 7. 90
78.75
7.71
154
OS/OS/91
47.82
78.70
7 .92
155
05/06/91
47.79
78.88
8.39
156
05/07/91
47 . 85
7S .84
8.37
157
Ob/Ofl/91
47 . 88
78 , 79
8 .05
158
05/09/91
47.91
78.73
B.Ot
159
05/10/91
47 .84
78.71
7 . 99
-------
£E-U
WWMMUWWWMUWMM-- - — — — — — —
---OOOOOOOOOOoaOUlCOlDlDlDlOe'SCDBaOCOBttaiCCN-vl-sKv'^^si^-HffllJl^^Ci^nfflJlffi
/O — OD3>lCrvai^WKi«»OiC'O-^^Ul^WM«»Cli:tE-^C^CriJiC^Ki-»CL005-JCTCn-fc«CJW-»C'
oooooooooooooooooooooocoooooooooocooooooooooooooooooo
S,nSSSNSSSNNvvSN"nS.\SXX^XSSS-sSXV.SS.>sV\S.SS\SSN.NNXXS1S\XSS>s.N
OOUWWVIOIO WIO WfOlO^ — — — _» —. — QOOOOOOOOWCiK5WION>lOrOls3MNJK>-'-»-^^-»-^-^^--^
to — Otow-JCiLT^toho—¦oo»-jJiaif»Q>o-«-Ot£CD-ji3^(jiji.a:fo-^-'C(D®l0lC(D(O(D(C>CDt0l0tD&(Dl0<£l&(d(0(£
ttC»ODC&®CD©COCOOOBiCC>ttiCD(»0>to©C»OOC&®D:QSt»®tttt-J05'sJ-Jffi-J-J-J«-J-J-JOi-'J-«J-JC&*«J-«J-*J-g'-[OtolCOte(DODO0O)CUi(fiOU(O^
55-j - MCoow-t'OffiOwy"w--'yi-fifotfO^aiA^u-0:O(cO5)M*oui-OuiOt&--'
row^OTON>-*-oio^ui o.o L"0«r»'£i-Jff3CDO^ — a,OLnwuicnro-«;Lr--;^ffi©^}-jffj-»:coffio--j^ff)CD--j'sjcc-'asa
roD^-'^^(»gi<^-t^U£'^^f)^ui4iM.^trojui^o-ju:cr)<£)ai£'->iLrica>uioff:ci5cr»-jjv
Z o
w c
rt
c
D >
m r-
S
O X
Z 33
1/1 o
£ X SC
o o o
CC.S
ifi m
O O
"0 H C
O >
« i r
-.z «i
H EC H
s:n
> r O
v n- >
S I
z >
Ol^Z
-' o
•OCHOWlDdCOt&'-JOOCJl-ltt-Jtt — "»JW-»C0.-.0,l&»O©—-c»U>-'J«;jlMC>^©C^©IOUlCDi»<£CD
• ®O(0CBtfitD(occ«owwcji®w^©<£>tPtto©tt)ff>tnik©© H
-------
COAL PROPERTIES FROM QUALITY COAL HANDLTNG REPORTS
KIDC DEMQNSTRATION PROJECT - BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
SPARROWS POINT, MARYLAND
16:22 Tuesday, March 31, 1992 19
BULK
PULV.
%
DBS
DATE
DENSITY
% - l/B"
H20
213
07/03/S1
48.53
79.06
6.54
214
07/O4/91
48 . 49
79.06
7.20
215
07/05/91
46.43
78.88
7 .07
216
07/06/91
40 .49
79.33
6. 39
217
07/07/91
48.53
79.25
6.70
210
07/08/9!
48.46
78.58
6.48
2 19
07/09/9 I
46.45
76.61
6.46
220
07/10/91
48.52
78.77
7.04
221
07/ 11/91
48. 5G
78.74
7.23
222
07/12/91
48.53
78.32
6.48
223
07/13/91
4B.50
76.09
6.B5
224
07/14/91
48.48
76.8!
6 . 84
225
07/15/91
48.52
78 64
6.99
226
07/16/91
48.47
79 .01
6.70
227
07/17/91
48 . 43
78 .68
6.69
228
07/18/91
48.58
79.3b
7 .02
229
07/19/91
4B . 46
79. 16
6.70
230
07/20/91
48 . 43
7B . 72
6.42
231
07/21/91
48.46
79. 15
6.30
232
07/22/91
48.50
79.22
6. 45
233
07/23/91
48.46
78 .99
6.65
234
07/24/91
46.49
78.65
G. 79
235
07/25/91
48.39
79. 14
7 - 63
236
07/26/91
48.38
79.34
7,72
237
07/27/91
48.57
79.27
8.25
238
07/28/91
48.46
78.60
8. 15
239
07/29/91
48.39
79. 14
7.45
240
07/30/91
48.52
79. 14
7.92
241
07/31/91
46.62
79. 11
7.60
242
08/01/91
48.55
78.71
8. 14
243
00/02/91
48. 50
78.69
a. 11
244
OB/03/91
48.56
78. 6B
6 . 98
245
08/04/91
48.51
78.59
6.58
246
08/05/91
48.51
78.58
6.53
247
06/06/91
48.53
78 . 84
6.82
248
08/07/91
48.52
78.52
6.70
249
OB/Ofl/91
48.45
78. 5 1
6.22
250
08/09/91
48 .41
78 . 58
7.85
25 1
08/10/91
48.49
79, 20
7.99
252
08/ 1 1/91
48 . 56
78 . 83
7.45
253
OB/12/91
48.42
78 . 59
6.84
254
OB/13/91
48 . 47
79 . 16
7.93
255
08/14/91
4B .63
79 . 40
6.97
256
OB/15/91
48.35
79. 15
7.71
257
08/S6/91
48.55
79. 10
7 .09
258
08/17/91
48.43
79.35
6.74
259
oe/18/91
48.56
79. 12
6.94
260
08/19/91
48.43
79.44
7.25
261
08/20/91
48.51
78.92
8. 13
262
08/21/91
48.51
79. 14
7.72
263
08/22/91
48 53
78 90
7.22
264
Ofi/23/9f
48.50
79.38
6.53
265
08/24/91
48.45
76.76
7.G1
-------
COAL PROPERTIES FROM QUALITY COAL HANDLING REPORTS
KIDC DEMONS I RATION PROJECT - BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
SPARROWS POINT, MARYLAND
16:22 Tuesday, March 31, 1992 20
BULK
PULV.
%
OBS
DATE
DENSITY
% - 1 / B "
H20
266
OB/25/91
48 . 63
78 , 70
7 . 15
267
08/26/91
48.59
79. 15
6.79
266
03/27/91
48.60
78. 8B
7.00
269
00/26/9t
48. 51
78. 76
6.63
270
08/29/9f
48 . 31
78.72
7.02
27 1
08/30/91
48.60
78.81
6.71
212
OB/31/91
48 . 56
79.03
6 32
273
09/01/9 t
48.55
78.56
6.80
274
09/02/9t
48. 56
78.92
6,73
275
O9/03/91
48. 45
78.81
6 .85
276
09/04/9i
48.49
78.59
€.75
277
09/05/91
48. 44
79 . 2 6
7. 13
278
09/06/9t
48. 41
78.74
7 50
279
09/07/9 J
48.42
79. 10
6.44
280
09/O8/91
48. 41
78.62
6.45
281
09/09/9 t
48. 51
79.05
7 . 25
282
09/10/91
48.45
78.75
7.01
233
09/11/91
48. 51
79. 14
6.70
284
09/)2/91
48. 54
78.7B
6 90
1
285
09/13/91
48.44
79.09
6.67
286
09/14/91
48.66
78.83
6.59
i
287
09/15/91
48. 53
78 .75
6.99
- !
288
09/16/91
48. 38
78.81
6.90
289
09/l7/9t
48 50
79 .00
6.63
to 1
290
09/18/91
48. 59
79.05
7.06
- ui |
29 I
09/19/91
48. 47
79.01
7.06
i
292
09/20/91
48 43
78 65
7 .67
i
293
09/21/91
48. 43
78.80
7.40
294
09/22/91
48. 39
78.75
7.79
295
09/23/9t
48 55
78.57
€.45
296
09/24/91
48.38
78.58
7.25
297
09/25/91
48 60
78 .69
6 .97
298
09/26/9t
48.36
78 70
7 .89
299
09/27/91
48. 43
78.72
7 .04
300
09/28/91
48. 43
78.98
6.89
301
09/29/91
48.41
79 . 13
7 97
302
09/30/91
48. 54
79.04
a.oe
303
10/01/91
48. 48
79, 10
7.44
304
10/02/91
48 54
78 .69
7 .50
305
10/03/91
48. 35
79.OO
7.85
306
10/04/91
48 . 4 1
78 .72
7 . 76
307
10/05/91
48.41
78.72
7.86
308
10/06/31
48. 47
78.60
7 98
309
10/07/91
48 . 50
78.75
7.70
310
10/08/91
48.42
79.00
7,65
311
10/09/91
48. 44
78.50
8 99
312
10/10/91
48 42
78.68
7 ,69
313
10/11/91
48.47
78.76
7 .64
314
10/12/91
48. 47
7B 87
a 03
315
10/13/91
48 41
78 99
a. 40
316
10/14/91
4B , 50
78.81
6. 59
317
10/15/yi
48. 51
78 . 7 2
8 42
318
10/16/91
48 51
79.23
7 ,58
-------
COAL PROPERTIES FROM QUALI I V COAL HANDLING REPORTS
KIOC DCMDMSTRATION PROJECT - BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
SPARROWS POINT. MARYLAND
16: 22 Tuesday, March 31. 1992 21
SULK
PULV .
%
06 S
DATE
DENSITY
% -1/8"
H2Q
319
10/17/91
48.44
78 66
7.71
320
10/18/91
40 . 39
78.98
86O
321
10/19/91
48. 55
78. 61
7.62
322
10/20/91
40.60
78.65
7.45
323
1Q/21/91
48.52
78 . B3
7.29
324
10/22/91
48.47
78. 69
7.77
325
10/23/91
48.50
79.01
7.94
326
10/24/91
48. 46
78 . 70
7.45
327
10/25/91
48.62
78.72
6.93
326
10/26/91
48.57
76 94
7.70
329
tO/27/91
48. 57
79 OS
7. 44
330
10/28/91
48.50
78 B6
7.15
331
10/29/91
48.52
79.06
7.09
332
10/30/91
48.64
79 11
7. 36
333
11/01/91
48.42
78 . 94
7.40
334
1 1/02/91
48.52
78. BO
6.65
335
11/03/91
48 . 47
78 76
7.21
336
11/04/91
48 . 39
79.32
6. 14
337
11/05/91
48.56
79.22
7 . 20
338
11/06/91
48 52
79.01
6.99
339
11/07/91
48.47
79. 17
7.04
340
>1/08/91
48. 47
78. 94
7 . 10
341
11/09/91
48.50
78 . 71
6.37
342
11/10/91
48.46
78 . 66
6.67
343
11/11/91
48.57
79 . 00
7. 10
344
11/(2/91
48.46
78 . 72
7.60
345
1 1/13/91
48.47
78 79
7.40
346
1 1/14/91
48.49
79 . 12
7.55
347
11/15/91
48.46
76.75
7.32
348
1 1/16/91
43.42
70 . 60
8.35
349
1 1/17/91
48.47
78.55
7 .76
350
1 1/18/91
48.48
78. 70
7.43
351
1 1/19/91
48.51
70 . 92
7 . 38
352
11/20/91
48.54
78.69
7.55
353
1 1/21/91
48.56
79. 13
7.47
354
1 1/22/91
48.49
79.07
7.62
355
1 1/23/91
48.44
70.91
8.40
356
1 1/24/91
48.52
79. 33
6.60
357
11/25/91
48 . 52
7B 69
6 .49
358
11/26/91
48.40
78.88
8.80
3b9
11/27/91
48.34
76 .60
9.20
360
11/28/91
48 37
78.76
9.21
361
11/29/91
4a. 41
78 . 70
8.61
362
11/30/91
43.63
78.50
8. 35
363
12/01/91
46.62
78 .50
9. 10
364
12/02/91
48.47
70.72
8.B5
365
12/03/91
43.55
78.60
8 . 98
366
12/04/91
f
i
t
-------