<^ED87^

Working Together
FY 2018-2022 U.S. EPA Strategic Plan
February 2018

-------
EPA's Mission
Protect Human Health and the Environment
Goal 1
Core Mission:
Deliver real results to provide
Americans with clean air, land,
and water, and ensure
chemical safety.
Goal 2
Cooperative Federalism:
Rebalance the power
between Washington and
the states to create tangible
environmental results for the
American people.
Goal 3
Rule of Law and Process:
Administer the law as
Congress intended, to refocus
the Agency on its statutory
obligations under the law.

-------
Table of Contents
Administrator's Message	2
Introduction	4
Goal 1: Core Mission	6
Objective 1.1: Improve Air Quality	8
Objective 1.2: Provide for Clean and Safe Water	11
Objective 1.3: Revitalize Land and Prevent Contamination 	15
Objective 1.4: Ensure Safety of Chemicals in the Marketplace 	19
Goal 2: Cooperative Federalism	24
Objective 2.1: Enhance Shared Accountability	26
Objective 2.2: Increase Transparency and Public Participation 	30
Goal 3: Rule of Law and Process 	34
Objective 3.1: Compliance with the Law 	36
Objective 3.2: Create Consistency and Certainty 	39
Objective 3.3: Prioritize Robust Science	42
Objective 3.4: Streamline and Modernize 	46
Objective 3.5: Improve Efficiency and Effectiveness	48
The GPRA (Government Performance and Results Act) Modernization Act of 2010 directs agencies to consult with the Congress and requires that they solicit and
consider the views and suggestions of those entities likely to be interested in or potentially affected by a strategic plan. Consultation with EPA's federal, state, tribal,
and local government partners and its many stakeholders is integral to the Agency's strategic planning process. In developing the FY 2018-2022 EPA Strategic Plan,
EPA issued a Federal Register notice and used www.regulations.gov to encourage and share feedback on the draft Plan. The Agency also sent notifications on the
availability of the draft Plan to leaders of the Agency's Congressional authorizing, appropriations, and oversight committees, and notified all federally-recognized Indian
tribes of the opportunity for consultation and coordination. These outreach efforts resulted in unique submissions from approximately 5,000 organizations and individuals.

-------
I 		
Message from Administrator Pruitt
I am proud to present the U.S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency's FY 2018-
FY 2022 Strategic Plan, which empha-
sizes the EPA's "Back-to-Basics" agenda.
The agenda set out in this plan has three
over-arching goals which reflect my core
philosophies: (1) refocus the agency back
to its core mission; (2) restore power to
the states through cooperative feder-
alism; and (3) lead the agency through
improved processes and adhere to the
rule of law.
The agency's mission of protecting
human health and the environment reso-
nates with all Americans; we all can agree
that we want our future generations to
inherit a cleaner, healthier environment
that supports a thriving economy.
Our nation has made great progress in
making rivers and lakes safer for swim-
ming and boating, reducing the smog that
clouded city skies, cleaning up lands that
were once used as hidden chemical dumps
and providing Americans greater access to
information on chemical safety. However,
we still have important work to do,
We must create a sense of shared
accountability between states, tribes
and the federal government to achieve
positive environmental results. Along
with faithfully following the rule of
law, improves the processes by which
the EPA has operated and is crucial to
advance the agency's mission.
Over the next five years, the EPA will
prioritize key activities to support attain-
ment of the national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS) and implementation
of stationary source regulations.
We will work with our state and tribal
partners to rapidly approve their imple-
mentation plans for attaining air quality
standards to reduce contaminants that
cause or exacerbate health issues.
Water
We will modernize and update aging
drinking water, wastewater and storm-
water infrastructure which the American
public depends on.
The agency will continue to leverage the
State Revolving Funds (SRFs) and Water
Infrastructure Finance and Innovation
Act (WIFIA) to assist states, tribes, mu-
nicipalities and private entities to finance
high-priority infrastructure investments
that protect human health and the
environment,
Land
I am placing particular emphasis on my
top priority list of Superfund sites and

-------
3
will implement Superfund Task Force
recommendations to accelerate the pace
of cleanups and promote site reuse, while
addressing risks to human health and the
environment.
The agency will accelerate cleanup by
re-prioritizing some resources to focus
on remedial actions, construction com-
pletions, ready-for-reuse determinations
and National Priorities List site deletions.
Chemicals
We will prioritize the safety of chemicals
in the marketplace in the implementation
of the new Frank R. Lautenberg Chem-
ical Safety for the 21st Century Act,
which modernizes the Toxic Substances
and Control Act (TSCA).
To achieve this, the EPA will focus on
meeting its statutory requirements
and mandatory deadlines of TSCA and
ensure our reviews are efficient, effective
and transparent to stakeholders.
More than 45 years after the creation
of the EPA most states, and to a lesser
extent territories and tribes, are autho-
rized to implement delegated federal
environmental programs within their
jurisdictions. Recognizing the congres-
sionally intended responsibilities of our
state, local and tribal partners, we must
adapt and modernize our practices to
reduce duplication of effort and tailor
oversight of delegated programs.
For example, the EPA will expand its
compliance assistance work by continu-
ing to partner with third-party organi-
zations and federal agencies to support
existing web-based, sector-specific
compliance assistance centers and seek
to develop new centers. I will lead an
assessment of our shared governance to
clarify the agency's statutory roles and
responsibilities and tailor state oversight
to maximize our return on investment
and reduce burden on states.
Over the next five years, the EPA will
improve its processes and reinvigorate
the rule of law as it administers environ-
mental regulations as Congress intended
and will refocus the agency on its core
statutory obligations.
I am a firm believer that federal
agencies exist to administer laws
passed by Congress, in accordance
with the will of this body. The EPA
will ensure compliance with the law by
providing consistency and certainty for
the regulated community and clarify the
impact of proposed actions on human
health, the environment and the econo-
my to provide a clear path and timeline
for entities to achieve compliance.
Further, we will reform our approach
to regulatory development and prioritize
meeting our statutory deadlines to en-
sure that expectations for the regulated
community and the public are clear and
comprehensive. The EPA will also employ
business process improvement strategies,
such as Lean, to improve efficiencies in all
permitting processes, working along-
side states to streamline the review of
state-issued permits and to improve our
internal business processes.
I believe we can accomplish the
environmental and human health
outcomes outlined in this Strategic Plan
by increasing collaboration with other
external partners and striving to achieve
improved consistency and certainty for the
regulated community.
'
EPA Administrator
Scott Pruitt

-------
4 		
Introduction
Goal 1
Core Mission:
Deliver real results to provide
Americans with clean air, land, and
water, and ensure chemical safety.
Goal 2
Cooperative Federalism:
Rebalance the power between
Washington and the states to
create tangible environmental
results for the American people.
Goal 3
Rule of Law and Process:
Administer the law, as Congress
intended, to refocus the Agency
on its statutory obligations
under the law.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) developed this FY 2018-2022
EPA Strategic Plan (the Plan) to: (1) refocus the Agency back to its core mission;
(2) restore power to the states through cooperative federalism; and (3) lead the
Agency through improved processes and adhere to the rule of law. The FY 2018-
2022 EPA Strategic Plan sharply refocuses EPA on its role of supporting the primary
implementers of environmental programs-states and federally-recognized Indian
tribes1-by streamlining programs and processes, reducing duplication of effort,
providing greater transparency and listening opportunities, and enabling the Agency
to focus on its core mission work. Process, the rule of law, and cooperative federalism
are necessary for an efficient and effective Agency to provide tangible and real
environmental results to the American people.
EPA's senior managers will use this Plan routinely as a management tool to guide
the Agency's path forward, tracking progress and assessing and addressing risks and
challenges that could potentially interfere with EPA's ability to accomplish its goals.
The three strategic goals established in the Plan are supported by strategic objectives
and strategic measures2 focused on advancing human health and environmental
results over the next five years. These longer-term strategic measures are supported
by annual measures included in the annual performance plans and budgets that EPA
submits to Congress. The strategies and strategic measures in this Plan highlight key
areas in which the Agency will make the most dramatic changes over the next five
years and are not intended to address all ongoing programs. The annual performance
plans and budgets, and supporting annual and operational measures, address a
broader range of the Agency's work. In addition, the Agency will hold quarterly and
monthly meetings to assess progress toward annual and long-term strategic measures.
The EPA Administrator established two-year agency priority goals (APGs) for
accelerating progress on EPA priorities. APGs reflect agency leadership's top near-
term priorities for implementing performance improvement. EPA's APGs were
selected from among the suite of strategic measures. EPA will support these priority
goals by developing two-year implementation plans and reporting quarterly progress.
The FY 2018-2022 EPA Strategic Plan is supported by other, more detailed Agency
plans in specific areas. For example, EPA's Human Capital Operating Plan details the
actions the Agency will execute to achieve its overarching human capital goals, and
1	Tribes include all federally-recognized tribes, including Alaska Native Villages (as issued by the Secretary
of the Interior).
2	Strategic measures are the measurable results the Agency is working to achieve over the life of the
Plan and are supported by data quality records (DQRs), which provide details such as the methods of
measurement and other important contextual information such as baselines. DQRs can be found at
https://www.epa.gov/planandbudget/results.

-------
FY 2018-2019 Agency Priority Goals
APG-1: Improve air quality by implementing pollution control measures to reduce the number of nonattainment areas. By September
30, 2019, EPA, in close collaboration with states, will reduce the number of nonattainment areas to 138 from a baseline of 166.
APG-2: Empower communities to leverage EPA water infrastructure investments. By September 30, 2019, EPA will increase
by $16 billion the non-federal dollars leveraged by EPA water infrastructure finance programs (Clean Water and Drinking
Water State Revolving Funds and the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act).
APG-3: Accelerate the pace of cleanups and return sites to beneficial use in their communities. By September 30, 2019, EPA
will make an additional 102 Superfund sites and 1,368 brownfields sites ready for anticipated use (RAU).
APG-4: Meet new statutory requirements to improve the safety of chemicals in commerce. By September 30, 2019, EPA will
complete in accordance with statutory timelines (excluding statutorily-allowable extensions): 100% of required EPA-initiated
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) risk evaluations for existing chemicals; 100% of required TSCA risk management
actions for existing chemicals; and 80% of TSCA pre-manufacture notice final determinations.
APG-5: Increase environmental law compliance rate. Through September 30, 2019, EPA will increase compliance by reducing
the percentage of Clean Water Act (CWA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permittees in
significant noncompliance with their permit limits to 21% from a baseline of 24%.
APG-6: Accelerate permitting-related decisions. By September 30, 2019, EPA will reduce by 50% the number of permitting-
related decisions that exceed six months.
EPA's Information Technology/Information Management Strategic Plan will guide efforts to support and modernize the Agency's
technology and data infrastructure. The EPA's workforce and reform efforts will support streamlining efforts to work more
efficiently and effectively in the future. The many activities described in these plans align with and help position the Agency to
achieve the strategic goals and objectives presented in this Plan.
EPA is also in the process of deploying a Lean management system specifically designed to deliver measurable results that align
with this Plan. Lean is a set of principles and tools designed to identify and eliminate waste from processes while maximizing
customer value and return on taxpayer investment. EPA will standardize and streamline processes to strengthen efficiency and
quality to better meet mission goals and objectives. Under the Administrator's leadership, EPA will become a Lean organization.
Strategies to achieve EPA's goals and objectives are also informed by gathering evidence related to environmental problems and
evaluating the effectiveness of the strategies that the programs use to address them. Examples of recent evidence and evaluation
efforts used to develop this FY 2018-2022 EPA Strategic Plan and a preliminary list of future planned efforts can be found at
https://www.epa.gov/ planandbudget/ strategicplan.

-------
Goal
Core Mission

-------
Deliver real results to provide Americans with clean
air, land, and water, and ensure chemical safety.
Pollution comes in many forms with
myriad impacts on human health and
the environment. With the goal of
clean and safe air, water, and land for all
Americans, Congress enacted a range
of environmental statutes that spell out
EPA's core responsibilities. Our nation
has come a long way since EPA was
established in 1970. We have made great
progress in making rivers and lakes safe
for swimming and boating, reducing the
smog that clouded city skies, cleaning
up lands that were once used as
hidden chemical dumps, and providing
Americans greater access to information
on the safety of the chemicals all
around us. Today we can see enormous
progress—yet we still have important
work to do.
EPA has established priorities for
advancing progress over the next five
years in each of its core mission areas-
land, air, water—as well as chemicals.
The Agency will focus on speeding the
cleanup of Superfund and brownfields
sites, and will use a list of top priority
sites to advance progress on Superfund
sites of particular concern. We will
work with states and tribes to more
rapidly approve their implementation
plans for attaining air quality standards,
reducing contaminants that can cause
or exacerbate health issues. We will
work with our state and tribal partners
to provide for clean and safe water by
updating aging infrastructure, both for
drinking water and wastewater systems.
EPA's top priority for ensuring the
safety of chemicals in the marketplace
is the implementation of the new Frank
R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the
21st Century Act, which modernizes
the Toxic Substances and Control Act
(TSCA) by creating new standards
and processes for assessing chemical
safety within specific deadlines. These
efforts will be supported by strong
compliance assurance and enforcement
in collaboration with our state and tribal
partners, up-to-date training for partners,
and use of the best available science and
research to address current and future
environmental hazards, develop new
approaches, and improve the foundation
for decision making.
The Agency will collaborate more
efficiently and effectively with other
federal agencies, states, tribes, local
governments, communities, and other
partners and stakeholders to address
existing pollution and prevent future
problems. EPA will directly implement
federal environmental laws in Indian
country where eligible tribes have not
taken on program responsibility.
With our partners, we will pay particular
attention to vulnerable populations.
Children and the elderly, for example,
may be at significantly greater risk
from elevated exposure or increased
susceptibility to the harmful effects of
environmental contaminants. Some low-
income and minority communities may
face greater risks because of proximity
to contaminated sites or because
fewer resources are available to avoid
exposure to pollutants. Tribal ways of life
such as traditional subsistence hunting,
fishing, and gathering also may increase
exposure to contaminants and increase
risks. Much work remains and, together
with our partners, we will continue
making progress in protecting human
health and the environment.

-------
GOAL 1: CORE MISSION
8 •	
Objective 1.1
Improve Air Quality
Work with states and tribes to accurately measure air
quality and ensure that more Americans are living and
working in areas that meet high air quality standards.
Introduction
As part of its mission to protect human
health and the environment, EPA is
dedicated to improving the quality of
the nation's air. From 1970 to 2016,
aggregate national emissions of the six
criteria air pollutants3 were reduced
over 70 percent, while gross domestic
product grew by over 253 percent.
Despite this progress, in 2016, more
than 120 million people lived in counties
with monitored air quality that did
not meet standards for at least one
criteria pollutant. EPA's work to control
emissions of air pollutants is critical to
continued progress in reducing public
health risks and improving the quality
of the environment. Over the next five
years, EPA will conduct a wide range of
activities that contribute to improving air
quality and protecting human health and
the environment.
Strategic Measure
SM-1 By September 30, 2022, reduce the number of nonattainment areas to 1014.
Strategies for Achieving the Objective
EPA works in cooperation with states, tribes, and local governments to design and implement air quality standards and programs.
EPA relies on other federal agencies, academia, researchers, industry, other organizations, and the public. These partnerships are
critical to achieving improvements in air quality and reducing public health risks.
EPA will prioritize key activities to support attainment of the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) and implementation
of stationary source regulations. The Agency will address its Clean Air Act (CAA) responsibilities by collaborating with and
providing technical assistance to states and tribes to develop plans and implement decisions that administer the NAAQS and
:: The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires EPA to set National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for six common air pollutants including carbon monoxide,
lead, ground-level ozone, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide.
4 The baseline is 166 nonattainment areas as of 10/1 /2017.

-------
GOAL 1: CORE MISSION
	• 9
visibility programs; taking federal oversight actions such as approving state implementation plan/tribal implementation plan (SIP/
TIP) submittals consistent with statutory obligations; developing regulations and guidance to implement standards; and addressing
transported air pollution. EPA will focus on ways to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the SIP/TIP process, including the
Agency's own review process, with a goal of maximizing timely processing of state/tribal-requested implementation plan actions to
help move more quickly to attainment.
EPA will operate effective nationwide and multi-state programs, such as the acid rain program and the cross-state air pollution rule,
which address global, national, and regional air pollutants from the power sector and other large stationary sources. The Agency
also will develop and provide data, analysis, and technical tools and assistance to industries, states, tribes, and communities to meet
CAA obligations and other statutory requirements.
EPA also develops, implements, and ensures compliance with national emission standards to reduce mobile source-related air
pollution from light-duty cars and trucks, heavy-duty trucks and buses, nonroad engines and vehicles, and their fuels—a priority
for the Agency to ensure that industry has the certainty it needs while protecting human health and the environment and to
support improvements in air quality and moving areas into attainment. The Agency evaluates new emission control technologies
and provides information to state, tribal, and local air quality managers on a variety of transportation programs. EPA will review
and approve vehicle and engine emissions certification applications and perform its compliance oversight functions on priority
matters where there is evidence to suggest noncompliance. The Agency will also conduct pre-certification confirmatory testing for
emissions and fuel economy for passenger cars.
EPA develops and implements national emission standards for stationary and mobile sources and works with state, tribal, and local air
agencies to address air toxics problems in communities. For stationary sources, pursuant to the CAA, EPA develops initial air toxics
emissions standards for categories of industrial sources and reviews these standards' risk reduction and technological currency according
to timeframes set by the Act. EPA will conduct these reviews to meet CAA requirements and to ensure that the air toxics rules
appropriately protect public health.
To support our partners in meeting their CAA obligations, EPA will provide grants and technical assistance to state, tribal, and
local air pollution control agencies to manage and implement their individual air quality programs, including funding for air quality
monitoring. State and tribal air quality monitoring, which provides critical information for developing clean air plans, for research,
and for public awareness, will be a focus of the Administration.
EPA will prioritize efforts to reduce the production, import, and use of ozone depleting substances (ODS), including reviewing and listing
alternatives that are safer for the stratospheric ozone layer through implementation of Title VI of the CAA and the Montreal Protocol.

-------
GOAL 1: CORE MISSION
10 •	
EPA also is responsible for measuring and monitoring ambient radiation and radioactive materials and assessing radioactive
contamination in the environment. The Agency supports federal radiological emergency response and recovery operations under
the National Response Framework and the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan and will assist
states, tribes, and other partners, as appropriate. EPA will design essential training and conduct exercises to improve our nation's
radiation response preparedness.
External Factors and Emerging Issues
Emerging measurement and information technologies are shifting the paradigm for air quality data. Traditionally, state, tribal,
and local air programs, along with EPA, have been the primary resource for collecting, storing, sharing, and communicating air
data. Increasingly, air quality information is also available from nontraditional sources, such as satellites or sensors. Additionally,
big data companies are becoming involved in storing, analyzing, and presenting publicly available air quality data alongside other
data sets. These developments are expected to have profound influence on understanding air quality, as well as determining
the most cost-effective ways to improve air quality. EPA partners with states and tribes through efforts such as E-Enterprise,
and with other entities in a variety of ways to ensure that the Agency advances appropriate technologies and stays abreast of
emerging technologies.
EPA engages in both domestic and international forums to address the depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer, a global problem that
cannot be solved by domestic action alone. Success relies on joint action.
Lastly, there are several emerging issues and external factors that will affect how EPA protects the public from unnecessary
exposure to radiation, including evolving policies on radioactive waste management, uranium extraction and processing
technologies, a decrease in available radiation expertise, and new science on radiation health effects. The Agency will focus on
education, including formal and informal training in the areas of health physics, radiation science, radiation risk communications,
and emergency response to fill existing and emerging gaps.

-------
GOAL 1: CORE MISSION
	• 11
Objective 1.2
Provide for Clean and Safe Water
Ensure waters are clean through improved water
infrastructure and, in partnership with states and tribes,
sustainably manage programs to support drinking water,
aquatic ecosystems, and recreational, economic, and
subsistence activities.
	(§)	
Introduction
The nation's water resources are the
lifeblood of our communities, supporting
our economy and way of life. Across
the country we depend upon reliable
sources of clean and safe water. Just a
few decades ago, many of the nation's
rivers, lakes, and estuaries were grossly
polluted, wastewater sources received
little or no treatment, and drinking water
systems provided very limited treatment
to water coming through the tap. Now
over 90 percent of the population
receives safe drinking water from
community water systems regulated by
EPA or delegated states and tribes, and
many formerly impaired waters have
been restored and support recreational
and public health uses that contribute to
healthy economies.
We have made significant progress
since enactment of the Clean Water
Act (CWA); Safe Drinking Water
Act; and Marine Protection, Research,
and Sanctuaries Act. However,
serious water resource and water
infrastructure challenges remain.
Many communities need to improve
and maintain both drinking water
and wastewater infrastructure and
develop the capacity to comply with
new and existing standards. Tens of
thousands of homes, primarily in tribal
and disadvantaged communities and
the territories, lack access to basic
sanitation and drinking water.
Over the next five years, EPA will work
with states, tribes, territories, and local
communities to better safeguard human
health; maintain, restore, and improve
water quality; and make America's
water systems sustainable and secure,
supporting new technology and
innovation wherever possible.

-------
GOAL 1: CORE MISSION
12 •	
Strategic Measures
SM-2 By September 30, 2022, reduce the number of community water systems out of compli-
ance with health-based standards to 2,7005.
SM-3 By September 30, 2022, increase by $40 billion the non-federal dollars leveraged by EPA
water infrastructure finance programs (CWSRF, DWSRF, and WIFIA)6.
SM-4 By September 30, 2022, reduce the number of square miles of watershed with surface
water not meeting standards by 37,000 square miles7.
Strategies for Achieving the Objective
Invest in Infrastructure to Spur Environmental Benefits and Economic Growth
Supporting state, tribal, and local efforts to modernize the outdated drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure on
which the American public depends is a top priority for EPA. The Agency will promote construction of infrastructure in tribal and,
small, rural, and disadvantaged communities. EPA's state revolving fund (SRF) and Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act
(WIFIA) programs will allow the Agency, states, tribes, municipalities, and private entities to finance high-priority infrastructure
investments that protect human health and the environment. The revolving nature of the SRFs and the leveraging capacity of
WIFIA greatly multiply the federal investment. For the clean water SRF, EPA estimates that every federal dollar contributed thus
far has resulted in close to three dollars of investment in water infrastructure. For the drinking water SRF, for every one dollar the
federal government has invested, the states, in total, delivered $1.80 in assistance to drinking water systems. For WIFIA, for every
$1 million in credit subsidy appropriations, EPA could potentially provide approximately $100 million in direct credit assistance,
resulting in an estimated $200 million in total infrastructure investment.
5	Baseline is 3,600 community water systems out of compliance with health-based standards as of FY 2017.
6	The baseline is $32 billion in non-federal dollars leveraged from the CWSRF and DWSRF between FY 2013 and FY 2017 (i.e., loans made from recycled loan
repayments, bond proceeds, state match, and interest earnings). The baseline does not include WIFIA leveraged dollars because the program's first loans are
anticipated to close in FY 2018.
7	Draft baseline is 464,020 square miles of impaired waters as of 9/2017, to be updated in 10/2018.

-------
GOAL 1: CORE MISSION
	• 13
Protect Human Health
Sustaining the quality of our water resources is essential to safeguarding human health. More than 300 million people living in
the United States rely on the safety of tap water provided by public water systems that are subject to national drinking water
standards. EPA will help protect human health and make America's water systems secure by:
•	Providing financial assistance to states, tribes, and territories to assist public water systems in protecting and maintaining
drinking water quality;
•	Strengthening compliance with drinking water standards to ensure protection of public health by enhancing the technical,
managerial, and financial capability of those systems;
•	Continuing to protect and restore water resources, including sources of drinking water, from contamination;
•	Taking actions to address known and emerging contaminants that endanger human health;
•	Supporting states, tribes, territories, and local communities in implementing water programs by providing guidance, training,
and information;
•	Ensuring the security and preparedness of the nation's drinking water supplies by implementing EPA's national security
responsibilities for the water sector; and
•	Protecting underground sources of drinking water by providing for the safe injection of fluids underground for storage,
disposal, enhanced recovery of oil and gas, or minerals recovery.
Recent challenges in Flint, Michigan and elsewhere highlighted the need to strengthen EPA's implementation of the Safe Drinking
Water Act to ensure we protect and build upon the enormous public health benefits achieved through the provision of safe drinking
water throughout the country. The Agency's highest priorities include reducing exposure to lead in the nation's drinking water
systems, ensuring continuous compliance with contaminant limits, responding quickly to emerging concerns, and improving the nation's
aging and insufficient drinking water infrastructure to address significant needs. EPA is also collaborating with states and tribes to
share more complete data from monitoring at public water systems through the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS).
This will allow for better targeting of funding and technical assistance resources, and improve data quality while increasing public access
to drinking water data.
Human health and recreational criteria are the foundation for state, tribal, and territorial tools to safeguard human health. Over
the next five years we will improve our understanding of emerging potential waterborne threats to human health; provide
technical assistance and resources to help the states, tribes, and territories monitor and prevent harmful exposures; and develop
new or revised criteria as needed.
External Factors and Emerging Issues
Water quality programs face challenges such as increases in nutrient loadings, nonpoint source8 and stormwater runoff, and aging
infrastructure. EPA is carefully examining the potential impacts of and solutions to these issues. Many important water quality
problems have complex causes that can only be addressed through strategic use of federal, state, tribal, and local authorities. EPA
will work closely with its partners to ensure that these issues are addressed in a coordinated and effective manner, particularly
where water quality issues cross jurisdictional lines. The Agency will implement the National Aquatic Resource Surveys to support
collection of nationally-consistent data to support these efforts.
t: Read more about nonpoint source pollution: https://www.epa.gov/nps

-------
GOAL 1: CORE MISSION
14 •	
EPA is working with external partners and stakeholders to address the barriers to and incentives for ways that technology and
innovation can accelerate improvements in water infrastructure and protection and restoration of waters. Some key market
opportunities for innovative practices and technology to help address current and emerging water resource issues are identified in
EPA's Blueprint for Integrating Technology Innovation into the National Water Program.'3
Protect and Restore Water Quality
Protecting the nation's waters relies on cooperation among EPA, states, tribes, territories, and local communities and involves a
suite of programs to protect and improve water quality in the country's rivers, lakes, wetlands, and streams, as well as in estuarine,
coastal, and ocean waters. EPA will foster strong partnerships with other federal agencies, states, tribes, local governments, and
other organizations that facilitate achieving water quality goals while supporting robust economic growth. In partnership with
states, tribes, territories, and local governments, EPA core water programs will:
•	Develop recommended water quality criteria for protecting designated uses of water;
•	Assist states, authorized tribes, and territories in adopting water quality standards that support designated uses;
•	Establish pollution reduction targets for impaired waters;
•	Improve water quality by financing traditional and nature-based wastewater treatment infrastructure;
•	Develop national effluent guidelines that set a technology-based floor;
•	Work with partners to protect and restore wetlands and coastal and ocean water resources;
•	In cooperation with the Army Corps of Engineers, work with states and tribes interested in assuming the Clean Water
Act Section 404 program;
•	Prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants;
•	Update analytical methods that enable precise analysis; and
•	Conduct monitoring and assessment so we know the status of the nation's waters.
EPA will partner with states and tribes to implement the National Aquatic Resource Surveys (NARS)10 to provide nationally-consistent
and scientifically-defensible assessments of America's waters. These surveys will support EPA and its partners in identifying actions to
protect and restore water quality and in assessing whether these efforts are improving water quality over time.
3 Read more about the technology blueprint: https://www.epa.gov/innovation/water-technology-innovation-blueprints
10 Read more on NARS: https://www.epa.gov/national-aquatic-resource-surveys

-------
GOAL 1: CORE MISSION
	• 15
Objective 1.3
Revitalize Land and Prevent
Contamination
Provide better leadership and management to properly
clean up contaminated sites to revitalize and return the
land back to communities.
( ooo fcfV
Introduction
EPA works to improve the health and	sites. EPA recently convened a
livelihood of all Americans by cleaning	Superfund Task Force that identified
up and returning land to productive	42 recommendations to streamline
use, preventing contamination, and	and improve the Superfund process,
responding to emergencies. Challenging	Over the next five years, these
and complex environmental problems	recommendations and other innovative
persist at many contaminated properties,	ideas will be considered and applied to
including contaminated soil, sediment,	Superfund sites with priority given to
surface water, and groundwater that can	addressing National Priority List
communities to enhance the livability and
economic vitality of neighborhoods. The
Agency works with international, state,
tribal, and local governments, and other
federal agencies to achieve goals and help
communities understand and address
substances into the environment. EPA's
efforts are guided by scientific data,
risks posed by releases of hazardous
cause human health concerns.
(NPL) sites.
tools, and research that inform decisions
One of EPA's top priorities is
accelerating progress on Superfund
on addressing contaminated properties
EPA collaborates with other federal	and preparing for and addressing
agencies, industry, states, tribes, and local emerging contaminants.
11 Please see the Superfund Task Force Recommendations at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017-07/documents/superfund_task_force_report.pdf

-------
GOAL 1: CORE MISSION
16
Strategic Measures
SM-5 By September 30, 2022, make 255 additional Superfund sites ready for anticipated use
(RAU) site-wide12.
SM-6 By September 30, 2022, make 3,420 additional brownfields sites RAU13.
SM-7 By September 30, 2022, make 536 additional Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA) corrective action facilities RAU14.
SM-8 By September 30, 2022, complete 56,000 additional leaking underground storage tank
(LUST) cleanups that meet risk-based standards for human exposure and groundwater migration15.
Strategies for Achieving the Objective
Cleaning Up Contaminated Sites
Over the next five years, EPA will focus special attention on the Administrator's top priority Superfund sites and will implement
Superfund Task Force recommendations to accelerate the pace of cleanups and promote reuse, while addressing risks to
human health and the environment. Cleanup actions can take from a few months for relatively straight-forward soil excavation
or capping remedies to several decades for complex, large, area-wide groundwater, sediment, or mining remedies. NPL sites
in the investigation stages will be expedited by developing strategies that apply new technologies and innovative approaches.
NPL sites at which remedies already have been selected will be prioritized for faster completion and deletion from the NPL,
as will sites that have been on the NPL for five years or longer without significant progress. Finally, the Agency will aim to
accelerate cleanup by re-prioritizing some resources to focus on remedial actions, construction completions, ready-for-reuse
determinations, and NPL site deletions.
In addition, EPA will work with communities to revitalize their brownfield sites and return them to productive use, advancing
environmental and human health protection while stimulating economic development and job creation. EPA will award competitive
12 By the end of FY 2017, 836 Superfund sites had been made RAU site-wide.
1:: By the end of FY 2017, 5,993 brownfield properties/sites had been made RAU.
14	By the end of FY 2017, 1,232 RCRA corrective action facilities had been made RAU site-wide.
15	By the end of FY 2017, 469,898 LUST cleanups had been completed.

-------
GOAL 1: CORE MISSION
	• 17
grants to communities, states, and tribes to assess, clean up, and plan reuse of brownfield properties that are contaminated
or perceived to be contaminated. To reduce risks from exposure to waste, consistent with RCRA, EPA or authorized states
will oversee and manage cleanups by the owners or operators. There are currently 3,779 facilities subject to RCRA corrective
action. EPA will support, along with its state and tribal partners, the cleanup of LUST sites and work to revitalize abandoned
facilities. These cleanups protect people from exposure to contaminants, and can improve property values16 and provide
redevelopment opportunities.
Preparedness and Response
EPA prepares for the possibility of nationally-significant incidents and provides guidance and technical assistance to state, tribal, and
local planning and response organizations to strengthen their preparedness. During an incident, EPA works to prevent, mitigate, or
contain the release of chemical, oil, radiological, biological, or hazardous materials. The Agency will work with industry, states, tribes,
and local communities to ensure national safety and security for responses. EPA homeland security research fills critical scientific and
technological gaps, enhancing the Agency's ability to carry out its mandated national preparedness and emergency response and
recovery obligations, and informing disaster response and guidance. EPA develops the tools, methods, and data needed to implement
our environmental statutes effectively and support EPA and local emergency responders in characterizing chemical, biological,
or radiological (CBR) contamination; assessing exposure and risks to human health; cleaning up impacted areas; and improving
community resilience.
Preventing Contamination
With its state and tribal partners, EPA works to prevent releases of contamination, allowing the productive use of facilities
and land and contributing to communities' economic vitality17. In partnership with tribes, the Agency directly provides training,
compliance assistance, and inspection support to implement the updated underground storage tank (UST) regulations in Indian
country. EPA also helps to prevent chemical releases by reviewing approximately 12,500 risk management plans (RMPs) and
delivering RMP inspector training for federal and state inspectors. EPA seeks to prevent and prepare for accidental releases from
chemical facilities that store hazardous chemicals by requiring chemical facilities that store a certain amount of hazardous chemicals
to analyze the potential for accidental releases and possible consequences, develop an accident prevention program,
and coordinate with communities to ensure that all are prepared to respond to a release.
EPA will update and improve the efficiency of the RCRA hazardous waste regulations to meet the needs of today's business
and industry to ensure protective standards for managing hazardous waste. To prevent future environmental contamination
and to protect the health of the estimated 20 million people living within a mile of a hazardous waste management facility,18
EPA will support states to issue, update, or maintain RCRA permits for the approximately 20,000 hazardous waste units (such
as incinerators and landfills) at these facilities. EPA also will issue polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) cleanup, storage, and disposal
approvals, since this work cannot be delegated to states or tribes.
16	A 2016 study found that high profile UST releases decrease nearby property values by 4% - 6%. Once cleanup is completed, nearby property values rebound
by a similar margin. (Guignet, Dennis, Robin Jenkins, Matthew Ranson, and Patrick Walsh (2016), "Do Housing Values Respond to Underground Storage Tank
Releases? Evidence from High-Profile Cases across the United States," U.S. EPA National Center for Environmental Economics Working Paper, 2016-01, Washing-
ton, DC, March.) Available at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-05/documents/2016-01.pdf
17	This work will be done consistent with the government-wide National Response Framework and the National Disaster Recovery Framework.
1t: U.S. EPA, Office of Land and Emergency Management Estimate. 2014. Data collected includes: (1) site information as of the end of FY 2011 from RCRAInfo,
and (2) census data from the 2007-2011 American Community Survey.

-------
GOAL 1: CORE MISSION
18 •	
EPA will improve and modernize hazardous waste transportation and tracking by implementing the Hazardous Waste Electronic
Manifest Establishment Act, enacted on October 5, 2012. The fee-based e-Manifest system will provide better knowledge of waste
generation and final disposition, enhanced access to manifest information, and greater transparency for the public about hazardous
waste shipments. It will also reduce the burden associated with paper manifests by between 300,000 and 700,000 hours.1'3
As authorized in the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act of 2016, EPA will help states develop plans, work
to approve state permit programs for coal ash disposal, coordinate closely with the states on guidance for evaluating state permit
programs, and implement a coal ash permit program in Indian country.
Over the next five years, EPA will provide technical assistance, assets, and outreach to industry, states, tribes, and local
communities as part of its effort to ensure national safety and security for inland oil incidents. There are approximately 580,000
spill prevention, control, and countermeasure facilities, including a high-risk subset of 4,600 facility response plan facilities required
to ensure that resources will be available to respond in the event of a discharge.
A number of factors may delay cleanup timelines. For example, new scientific information (such as new toxicity information or a
new analytical method) can call previous determinations into question. In general, cleanup standards have become more stringent
over the years, and discovery of new pathways and emerging contaminants (such as vapor intrusion and per- and polyfluoroalkyl
substances [PFAS]) have made remediation of remaining Superfund sites more challenging. Many of the Superfund sites remaining
on the National Priorities List—including sediment, mining, and large groundwater sites—are large, contain multiple areas of
contamination, and require more complex remediation efforts. Discovery of new sites, newly detected contamination, or emerging
contaminants can also impact cleanup schedules.
Several external factors and emerging issues may affect the overall success of EPA's waste management and chemical facility risk
programs. Rapidly changing technology, emerging new waste streams, and aging infrastructure present challenges, as does the
complexity of issues and consideration of specific solutions for varying waste streams and situations.
The Agency recognizes that our state, tribal, local, and regional government partners face challenges in fully characterizing
environmental outcomes associated with land. Over the next five years, EPA will emphasize the importance of engaging
stakeholders at all levels and from all perspectives in making cleanup and land revitalization decisions.
10 From a 2009 programmatic estimate, cited in Hazardous Waste Management System; Modification of the Hazardous Waste Manifest System; Electronic
Manifests; Final Rule. 40 CFR § 260, 262, 263, 264, 265, and 271.
External Factors and Emerging Issues

-------
GOAL 1: CORE MISSION
	• 19
Objective 1.4
Ensure Safety of Chemicals in the
Marketplace
Effectively implement the Toxic Substances Control Act,
and the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act,
to ensure new and existing chemicals and pesticides are
reviewed for their potential risks to human health and the
environment and actions are taken when necessary.
Introduction
Chemicals and pesticides released into
the environment as a result of their
manufacture, processing, use, or disposal
can threaten human health and the
environment. EPA gathers and assesses
information about the risks associated
with chemicals and pesticides and
implements risk management strategies
when needed. EPA's research efforts will
help advance the Agency's ability to assess
chemicals more rapidly and accurately.
In 2016, TSCA was amended by the Frank
R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the
21st Century Act. The amendments give
EPA significant new, as well as continuing,
responsibilities for reviewing chemicals
in or entering commerce to prevent
unreasonable risks to human health and
the environment, including unreasonable
risks to potentially exposed or susceptible
subpopulations. Proper implementation,
as Congress intended, of the TSCA
amendments is one of EPA's top priorities.
The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) is the primary
federal law governing oversight of
pesticide manufacture, distribution,
and use in the United States. FIFRA
requires EPA to register pesticides based
on a finding that they will not cause
unreasonable adverse effects on people
and the environment, taking into account
the economic, social, and environmental
costs and benefits of the use of the
pesticide. Each time the law was amended,
Congress strengthened FIFRA's safety
standards while continuing to require
consideration of pesticide benefits.
In addition to FIFRA, the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)
governs the maximum allowable level
of pesticides in and on food grown and
sold in the United States. The legal
level of a pesticide residue on a food or
food item is referred to as a tolerance.
FFDCA requires that the establishment,
modification, or revocation of tolerances
be based on a finding of a "reasonable
certainty of no harm." When evaluating
the establishment, modification, or
revocation of a tolerance, EPA tries
to harmonize the tolerance with the
maximum residue levels (MRLs) set by
other countries to enhance the trade of
agricultural commodities.

-------
GOAL 1: CORE MISSION
20 •	
Strategic Measures
SM-9 By September 30, 2022, complete all EPA-initiated TSCA risk evaluations for
existing chemicals in accordance with statutory timelines20.
SM-10 By September 30, 2022, complete all TSCA risk management actions for
existing chemicals in accordance with statutory timelines21.
SM-11 By September 30, 2022, complete all TSCA pre-manufacture notice final
determinations in accordance with statutory timelines22.
SM-12 By September 30, 2022, complete all cases of Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)-mandated decisions for the pesticides
registration review program23.
SM-13 By September 30, 2022, reduce the Pesticide Registration Improvement Act
(PRIA) registration decision timeframe by an average of 60 days24.
Strategies for Achieving the Objective
Chemicals
Over the next five years, EPA will focus on meeting the statutory requirements and mandatory deadlines of the amended TSCA
and ensuring that the reviews are efficient, effective, and transparent to EPA's stakeholders. EPA will ensure that decisions are
based on science, are transparent, use methods and tools that are based on the weight of scientific evidence, are consistent with
the best available scientific information, and are reasonable and consistent with the intended use of the information.
Under the chemical data reporting (CDR) rule, EPA collects basic exposure-related information from manufacturers (including
importers) on the types, quantities, and uses of chemical substances produced domestically or imported into the United States.
Since the enactment of TSCA in 1976, many new chemicals have entered commerce following review by EPA under the TSCA
new chemicals program. Once in commerce, these chemicals are considered existing chemicals in commerce. The amended
TSCA provides a framework for making progress in understanding and managing the risks associated with existing chemicals
20	There is no baseline for this measure, as the program is operating under new statutory authority.
21	There is no baseline for this measure, as the program is operating under new statutory authority.
22	Baseline is 11.7% of determinations made within 90 days in FY 2017.
2:! Baseline is 251 decisions completed by the close of FY 2017 out of the known universe of 725.
24 Baseline is an average timeframe of 655 days (range: 93-2,086 days) for PRIA decisions for 68 new active ingredients completed in FY 2015-2017.

-------
GOAL 1: CORE MISSION
	• 21
EPA works closely with public health officials, researchers, and
agricultural experts to identify emerging pests; and, with industry,
to expeditiously register pesticides that address issues while
ensuring pesticide safety.

-------
GOAL 1: CORE MISSION
22 •	
to prevent unreasonable risk posed by their manufacturing, processing, distribution, use or disposal. The Act requires EPA to
identify high- and low-priority existing chemicals and evaluate high-priority chemicals against a new risk-based safety standard.
By December 2019, EPA must complete risk evaluations for the first ten high-priority chemicals, ramp up the risk evaluation
process so that 20 high-priority chemicals are under evaluation at all times, and identify 20 low-priority chemicals which will
not undergo further evaluation at this time. Chemical risk evaluations of existing chemicals must be completed within three
years. Transparency and stakeholder engagement are vital parts of the process, as they help inform EPA's prioritization and risk
evaluation of existing chemicals.
The Agency has two years to address unreasonable risks identified as warranted for action by the findings of the chemical risk
evaluations25. Risk management actions may include prohibiting, restricting, or modifying the manufacture, processing, distribution
in commerce or commercial use, modifying the labeling, recordkeeping, and other restrictions.
For new chemicals, EPA reviews and takes action on approximately 1,000 new chemical notices -including exemption notices-
submitted by industry annually, including pre-manufacture notices (PMNs), to ensure that the chemicals are not likely to pose
unreasonable risk before being allowed to commercialize. To prevent such risk, EPA may establish risk reduction/management
requirements through the new chemical review process to protect workers, consumers or the environment. The 2016 TSCA
amendments created additional new requirements for positive determinations of chemical safety, which have resulted in changes
to EPA's assessment process for new chemicals. In particular, for each new chemical notice, EPA now has 90 days to make an
affirmative determination of safety based on whether the chemical substance will present, may present, or is not likely to present
an unreasonable risk to human health or the environment, or that the available information is insufficient to enable the Agency to
make any of the above determinations. All four of these outcomes constitute final determinations on pre-manufacture notices and
thus count toward EPA's strategic target of completing 100% of such determinations within statutory timelines. Under the TSCA
amendments, if EPA makes an "insufficient information" determination, the Agency will work with the submitter to conduct testing
needed to make a determination or will impose restrictions on the substance that prevent exposure from occurring.
EPA will protect legitimate claims of confidentiality of the identity of chemicals. With limited exceptions provided by statute, the
Agency will review within 90 days all chemical identity confidential business information (CBI) claims requiring substantiation under
TSCA Section 14(c)(3) and a representative subset, comprising at least 25 percent, of all other CBI claims. Timely review of CBI
claims will help to increase transparency of chemical data. Additionally, EPA is developing guidance required by TSCA, as amended,
to address how states, tribes, and medical professionals in an emergency situation may gain access to CBI information.
The Agency uses a variety of tools and approaches to assess, prevent, and reduce chemical releases and exposures, and empowers
stakeholders by ensuring access to chemical data and other information and expertise. EPA annually publishes the Toxics Release
Inventory (TRI), a public database that contains release and other waste management information (e.g., recycling) and pollution
prevention data on over 650 toxic chemicals from approximately 20,000 industrial and federal facilities.
25 TSCA section 6(c)(1) requires final regulatory action within 2 years of publication of the final risk evaluation but allows for an extension to this deadline "for
not more than 2 years."

-------
GOAL 1: CORE MISSION
	• 23
Pesticides
EPA is responsible for licensing (registering) and periodically reevaluating (registration review) pesticides to protect consumers,
pesticide users, workers who may be exposed to pesticides, children, and other sensitive populations, while considering the
benefits associated with the use of the pesticide. EPA seeks public input on all pesticide reevaluations; all new active ingredients;
first food uses; and the establishment, modification, or revocation of tolerances. For example, the rules governing the
registration review program26 typically provide for three distinct comment periods at various stages of the review process. In
making pesticide decisions, the Agency often seeks input from stakeholders to address specific information, such as real-world
use patterns and benefits to the user community.
EPA works with other federal, state, and tribal agencies, trade organizations, industry, and non-governmental organizations to
ensure the effective and safe use of pesticides. EPA also has long provided financial support and expertise to states and tribes so
that they can provide training, education, and outreach to pesticide applicators about the safe, proper, and legal use of pesticides.
States and tribes work with farmers, businesses, and public agencies to protect human health and the environment and serve as a
critical part of job training and business growth in rural areas.
External Factors and Emerging Issues
The amended TSCA provides EPA the authority to collect user fees designed to defray 25 percent of the Agency's costs to
administer TSCA Sections 4, 5, 6, and 14. While EPA is directed by the statute to design the fees to collect 25 percent of the
costs of administering these sections, it has no control over exactly how much revenue the fees will generate. That will be
determined in large part by how the fee-paying community responds to the new fees in terms of their number of fee-related
submissions or requests.
New pests and disease vectors carried by pests create challenges for managing pesticides. EPA works closely with public health
officials, researchers, and agricultural experts to identify emerging pests; and, with industry, to expeditiously register pesticides
that address issues while ensuring pesticide safety. Assessing and appropriately addressing risks is complex. The Agency must
determine safe, effective methods of pesticide use, weighing differing risks for humans and ecosystems. For example, one
pesticide may have lower risks for humans than do other pesticides, but have increased risks for pollinators or endangered
species. Similarly, a pesticide may have risks for humans, but may be appropriate to fight mosquitos that carry diseases that also
pose risks to humans.
EPA continues to conduct education and outreach with tribes. One challenge is ensuring that the flow of information on the safe
use of pesticides reaches all federally-recognized tribes across the country, and comes in forms that result in protective actions
on the ground.
26 40 CFR 155 - Registration Standards and Registration Review

-------
Goal
Cooperative
Federalism

-------
Rebalance the power between Washington and the
states to create tangible environmental results for
the American people.
The idea that environmental protection
is a shared responsibility between
the states, tribes, and the federal
government is embedded in our
environmental laws, which in many
cases provide states and tribes the
opportunity and responsibility for
implementing environmental protection
programs. More than 45 years after
the creation of EPA and the enactment
of a broad set of federal environmental
protection laws, most states, and
to a lesser extent territories and
tribes, are authorized to implement
environmental programs within their
jurisdictions in lieu of EPA-administered
federal programs. Specifically, states
have assumed more than 96 percent
of the delegable authorities under
federal law. EPA retains responsibility
for directly implementing federal
environmental programs in much of
Indian country where eligible tribes
have not received delegable authorities.
There are also programs that by statute
may not be delegated to the states
or tribes. Recognizing these evolving
responsibilities, EPA headquarters
and regions will facilitate constructive
dialogue with states and tribes to ensure
maximum utilization of resources.
EPA will adapt its practices to reduce
duplication of effort with authorized
states and tribes, and tailor its oversight
of delegated programs.
Cooperative federalism - the relationship
between states, tribes and EPA - is
not just about who makes decisions,
but about how decisions are made
and a sense of shared accountability to
provide positive environmental results.
EPA understands that improvements
to protecting human health and the
environment cannot be achieved by
any actor operating alone, but only
when the states, tribes, and EPA, in
conjunction with affected communities,
work together in a spirit of trust,
collaboration, and partnership. Effective
environmental protection is best
achieved when EPA and its state and
tribal partners work from a foundation
of transparency, early collaboration
- including public participation - and
a spirit of shared accountability for
the outcomes of this joint work. This
foundation involves active platforms for
public participation, including building
the capacity of the most vulnerable
community stakeholders to provide
input. With these public participation
opportunities, the beneficiaries of
environmental protection-the American
people-will be able to more meaningfully
engage through their communities,
their local governments, and their state
and tribal governments. Including the
public's voice, particularly the voices of
the most vulnerable to environmental
and public health challenges among us, in
EPA's policy, regulatory, and assistance
work is essential to meeting their needs
as the Agency implements its statutory
responsibilities.
EPA also recognizes that meeting
the needs of states, tribes, local
governments, and communities, and
achieving environmental improvements
cannot be done in isolation from
economic growth. Opportunities for
prosperous economic growth and clean
air, water, and land are lost without
effective infrastructure investments
that align with community needs. This
is especially true for infrastructure
investments that repair existing
systems, support revitalization of
existing communities and buildings,
take advantage of existing roads, and
lead to the cleanup and redevelopment
of previously-used sites and buildings.
Currently, there is a need for significant
infrastructure investments. EPA will
play a role in meeting this need by
aligning its relevant programs to catalyze
other resources, supporting beneficial
infrastructure investments, and meeting
community needs for thriving economies
and improved environmental and human
health outcomes.

-------
GOAL 2: COOPERATIVE FEDERALISM
26
Objective 2.1
Enhance Shared Accountability
Improve environmental protection through shared
governance and enhanced collaboration with state,
tribal, local, and federal partners using the full range of
compliance assurance tools.
Introduction
In the spirit of cooperative federalism,
EPA and its partners have made
enormous progress in protecting
air, water, and land resources. EPA
recognizes that states and tribes vary
in the environmental challenges that
they face due to variations in geography,
population density, and other factors. EPA
will maximize the flexibilities provided by
law to take each state's unique situation
into account when making regulatory
and policy decisions. EPA directly
implements the majority of federal
environmental programs in Indian country.
The Agency actively works with tribes
to develop their capacity to administer
environmental programs and to enable
tribes that choose to implement federal
environmental laws and programs for
their lands. The unique relationship among
EPA recognizes the advances states	tools, such as compliance assistance and
and tribes have made in implementing	monitoring; electronic reporting; traditional
environmental laws and programs. This	enforcement; grants to states and tribes;
Administration will undertake a series of	and tribal capacity building. EPA is building
initiatives to rethink and assess where we	on progress made using E-Enterprise
are and where we want to be with respect	for the Environment, a platform for
to shared governance. These initiatives	transformative change that operationalizes
will clarify the Agency's statutory roles	cooperative federalism principles. EPA's
and responsibilities and tailor state and	E-Enterprise partnership with states and
tribal oversight to maximize our return	tribes modernizes the way we do the
on investment and reduce burden on	business of environmental protection,
states and tribes, while ensuring continued
progress in meeting environmental laws.
EPA and its co-regulators is the foundation	In addition, EPA, with its state, tribal, and
of the nation's environmental protection	local partners, ensures consistent and fair
system; each organization fulfills a critical	enforcement of federal environmental
role based on its expertise, abilities, and	laws and regulations. The Agency works
responsibilities in protecting and improving	jointly with its co-regulators to protect
human health and the environment.	human health and the environment,
using a full set of compliance assurance

-------
GOAL 2: COOPERATIVE FEDERALISM
		 27
Strategic Measures
SM-14 By September 30, 2022, increase the number of grant commitments achieved by states,
tribes, and local communities27.
SM-15 By September 30, 2022, increase the use of alternative shared governance approaches to
address state, tribal, and local community reviews28.
Strategies for Achieving the Objective
Shared Governance
To develop a future model of shared governance that takes into account the progress states and tribes have made in protecting
human health and the environment, the Agency will undertake an analysis of EPA's statutory roles and responsibilities to
determine what we have to do and assess what we want to do in light of priorities. The Agency will work with states and
tribes to find alternative approaches to shared governance, seeking to provide flexibility and streamline oversight of state and
tribal programs. As part of this process, the Agency will seek to understand which approaches currently are working well
for state, tribal and local co-regulators. EPA will pilot new approaches to oversight (e.g., permit reviews) where we have the
legal flexibility to do so and streamline those processes by which EPA reviews and approves state and tribal actions. EPA will
continue to work with states and tribes through E-Enterprise, focused on how we work and plan together, agree on priorities,
and allocate roles and responsibilities to update processes and programs. Through shared governance - engaging early and
meaningfully with states and tribes - the Agency will use E-Enterprise to deliver streamlined processes as well as accessible,
reliable information and data that benefit co-regulators and the regulated community.
The National Environmental Performance Partnership System (NEPPS) has long served as a model for advancing cooperative
federalism by providing the flexibility needed to address the unique needs of individual states and tribes to achieve the
best environmental results. NEPPS is a performance-based approach for organizing working relationships with states and
many tribes, providing specific benefits, such as greater flexibility to assess environmental conditions, shared priorities, and
strategically leveraged resources, thus improving cooperative federalism, shared governance, and shared accountability. EPA
will work with states and tribes to strengthen cooperative federalism principles through NEPPS, and intends to make NEPPS
training available for state and tribal stakeholders.
EPA will work closely with states and tribes on NEPPS, Performance Partnership Grants (PPGs), and related policies. PPGs are
a financial tool that allows states and tribes to combine separate "streams" of categorical grant funding, from across 20 eligible
categorical grants, into one multi-program grant with a single budget. The goal of the review is to understand PPG utilization
and outline a course of action addressing the challenges, leveraging lessons learned and progress achieved over the last 22 years.
27 Baseline will be determined in FY 2018.
2t: Baseline will be determined in FY 2018.

-------
GOAL 2: COOPERATIVE FEDERALISM
28 •	
The intent is to provide states and tribes the flexibility to maximize human health and environmental protection achieved by the
funds; further enhance the federal, state, and/or tribal partnership; and promote the goals of NEPPS.
EPA will respect the important role governors play in cooperative federalism and will seek their views and perspectives on
compliance assistance and other opportunities to improve EPA-state partnerships. In addition, the Agency will work to strengthen
intergovernmental consultation methods to engage stakeholders and hear diverse views on the impacts of prospective regulations.
Local governments also have a unique relationship with EPA as partners and often as innovative problem solvers. EPA works with
local governments to build stronger and more robust partnerships and bring local concerns forward into Agency decision making. As
part of these efforts, EPA seeks advice from the Local Government Advisory Committee (LGAC), a chartered policy committee
comprising elected and appointed local officials, on the impacts of the Agency's regulations and policies on local governments.
Consistent with the 1984 Indian Policy and EPA Policies on consultation and treaty rights2'3, EPA will work on a government-
to-government basis to build tribal capacity to implement federal programs through delegations, authorizations, and primacy
designations to enable tribes to meaningfully participate in the Agency's policy making, standard setting, and direct implementation
activities under federal environmental statutes30. EPA will work with individual tribes to develop and implement an EPA-Tribal
Environmental Plan (ETEP), a joint planning document for achieving stronger environmental and human health protection in Indian
country. ETEPs identify tribal, EPA, and shared priorities, and the roles and responsibilities for addressing those priorities.
EPA will focus its direct implementation efforts on areas of high need for human health or environmental protection, including
programs identified in the ETEP for which tribes are not eligible, as well as those for which tribes do not currently anticipate
seeking delegation, authorization, or primacy. In carrying out its direct implementation activities, EPA will work closely with tribes
to develop tribal capacity for programs for which they do not anticipate seeking delegation, authorization, or primacy. EPA will
also encourage tribes to participate in policy making and to assume appropriate partial roles in the implementation of programs,
including through the use of Direct Implementation Tribal Cooperative Agreements (DITCAs) or other agreements, as available.
Compliance Assurance
Over the next five years, the Agency will look for cost-effective ways to enhance the compliance assurance tool box in
collaboration with its state, tribal, local, federal, and industry partners. For example, the E-Enterprise Web Portal offers a platform
or gateway for making shared services available to states, tribes, and EPA to transact business (e.g., e-permitting and reporting). It
also provides information for the regulated community (e.g., compliance assistance information). Tools and services are designed
to enhance efficiency, reduce burden on the regulated community, and improve environmental outcomes. EPA will expand its
compliance assistance work by continuing to partner with third-party organizations and federal agencies to support the 17 existing
web-based, sector-specific compliance assistance centers31 and developing new centers. In general, an expanded and modernized
compliance assurance tool box will enhance EPA's ability to tailor compliance assurance approaches to the differing needs and
challenges among states and regulated entities. EPA is also working closely with states and tribes to develop new compliance tools
2« "[ipA p0|jCy for -[he Administration of Environmental Programs on Indian Reservations," "EPA Policy on Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribes,"
and "EPA Policy on Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribes: Guidance for Discussing Tribal Treaty Rights."
30	The Tribal Consultation Opportunities Tracking System (TCOTS) publicizes upcoming and current EPA consultation opportunities for tribal governments
and can be located here: https://TCOTS.epa.gov.
31	For more information on compliance assistance centers, see https://www.epa.gov/compliance/compliance-assistance-centers.

-------
GOAL 2: COOPERATIVE FEDERALISM
		 29
and approaches to make programs more effective and efficient in promoting compliance and remedying violations. Some of the
Agency's ongoing collaborative efforts with the Environmental Council of the States (ECOS) include32 producing webinars to help
identify new compliance approaches that EPA could pilot and evaluate, increasing availability of training, and preparing for advances
in pollution monitoring technology33.
A key component of EPA's overall compliance assurance program is compliance monitoring. Compliance monitoring allows the
regulatory agencies to detect noncompliance and promote compliance with the nation's environmental laws. Effective targeting of
compliance monitoring plays a central role in achieving the goals EPA has set for protecting human health and the environment.
EPA, state, and tribal inspectors often provide regulated entities with compliance assistance during the inspection process. On
a national level, EPA works closely with individual states, tribes, and state and tribal associations to develop, modernize, and
implement national compliance monitoring strategies to ensure a level playing field for regulated entities across the country. EPA
principally focuses compliance monitoring activities, such as field inspections, electronic reporting, and data analysis tools, for
those programs that are not delegated to states and tribes. The Agency provides monitoring, program evaluations, and capacity
building to support and complement authorized state, tribal, and local government programs. The Agency will work with its state
and tribal partners to enhance compliance monitoring tools and increase the use of Lean practices. Through E-Enterprise for the
Environment, EPA, states, tribes, and territories will collaborate to develop smart mobile tools to enhance the effectiveness and
efficiency of state, tribal, and EPA inspectors, and support advanced monitoring technology.
International Partnerships
To achieve the Agency's domestic environmental and human health objectives, the EPA will work with international partners to
address international sources of pollution, as well as the impacts of pollution from the United States on other countries and the
global environment. Pollution impacts air, water, food crops, and food chains, and can accumulate in foods such as fish. EPA efforts
will include working with international partners to strengthen environmental laws and governance to more closely align with U.S.
standards and practices and to help level the playing field for U.S. industry.
External Factors and Emerging Issues
Advances in the field of information technology and social science research may offer innovative ways to promote compliance. EPA is
partnering with states to help prepare for and use these technologies and research to carry out our statutory obligations. The Agency
also is working with the academic community on additional research to develop innovation in promoting compliance. EPA also will
work closely with ECOS; the National Tribal Caucus; state and tribal program associations; and individual states, tribes, and territories
to implement the Administrator's vision for cooperative federalism. In partnership with ECOS, EPA plans to develop principles and
best practices for enhancing collaboration among EPA and states on compliance assurance work. In addition, EPA will continue to
work with ECOS, the Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials (ASTSWMO), and individual states to
develop an integrated hardware/software solution that supports documenting and conducting inspections.
:U For more information on OECA's collaboration with ECOS via E-Enterprise, see Article: Advanced Monitoring Technology: Opportunities and Challenges.
A Path Forward for EPA, States, and Tribes.
33 For more information on a broader range of collaborations between OECA and ECOS, see Compendia of Next Generation Compliance Examples in Water,
Air, Waste, and Cleanup Programs.

-------
GOAL 2: COOPERATIVE FEDERALISM
30 •	
Objective 2.2
Increase Transparency and Public
Participation
Listen to and collaborate with impacted stakeholders and
provide effective platforms for public participation and
meaningful engagement.
Introduction
EPA will strengthen its community-	stakeholders, and will facilitate public
driven approach, which emphasizes	participation, emphasizing cooperation
public participation to better partner	and collaboration, especially at the
with states, tribes, and communities	early stages of Agency actions. This
and to maximize the support and	will provide a more comprehensive
resources of the entire Agency to	understanding of community needs,
create tangible environmental results.
The Agency will deploy its collective	The Agency also will coordinate better
resources and expertise to collaborate	across its programs and with federal
with states, tribes, and communities and	partners to ensure mutual efforts are
support locally-led, community-driven	aligned. EPA will include consideration
solutions to improved environmental	of vulnerable groups and communities
protection and economic growth. EPA	in decisions, and will reflect community
will increase transparency with industry,	needs in its actions and investments,
environmental groups, and other	recognizing that the needs of rural
communities may not be the same as
urban areas. Increasing transparency
and public participation in EPA's work
with other agencies will enhance the
Agency's ability to partner with states,
tribes, and local governments and
increase responsiveness to the needs of
their most vulnerable communities. EPA
will serve as a convener and leverage
resources with new and existing partners
to deliver services more efficiently and
effectively. The Agency also will engage
with regulated entities to identify reforms
to more efficiently and effectively meet
the nation's environmental goals.

-------
GOAL 2: COOPERATIVE FEDERALISM
		 31
Strategic Measure
SM-16 By September 30, 2022, eliminate the backlog and meet statutory deadlines for responding
to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests34.
Strategies for Achieving the Objective
Over the next five years, EPA will meet community needs through public participation and will build community capacity through
grants, technical assistance, partnering, and meaningful engagement. The Agency will leverage recommendations provided by
federal advisory committees, such as the National Environmental Justice Advisory Council (NEJAC), LGAC, and Children's Health
Protection Advisory Committee (CHPAC), and focus on partnerships representing vulnerable populations, such as youth, the
elderly, and low-income communities. Specifically, the Agency will engage with the focus communities identified by EPA regions to
understand each community's goals and identify its environmental priorities and needs, recognizing that rural communities and
more urban areas may have different priorities.
EPA will continue to provide loans and grants to states and tribes to improve infrastructure. Given that investment in
infrastructure is necessary for economic growth and environmental protection and that EPA investments are catalytic to both,
the Agency's efforts will be used to support private and public investment in economic revitalization and improved environmental
outcomes across the country. This requires that EPA strengthen its infrastructure and community assistance programs (e.g.,
the clean water SRF, drinking water SRF, Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act, environmental justice, community
revitalization, and brownfields area-wide planning grant programs) to better align EPA investments with each other and with other
federal investments in pursuit of economic revitalization and improved environmental outcomes. At the same time, EPA will ensure
that it is serving disadvantaged communities, leveraging private investment to improve the economy, and protecting human health
and the environment.
EPA will work in a focused manner to make infrastructure and public health protection investments in communities with and
through partners such as states and tribes. To further integrate and implement community environmental considerations within
EPA programs, the Agency will create tools to facilitate incorporation of community understanding, needs, and concerns across
program activities, and advance more systematic incorporation of existing tools and needs, such as use of the Environmental
Justice Screening and Mapping Tool (EJSCREEN) and EnviroAtlas. EPA will develop a cross-Agency communities team to lead
regional involvement in and resourcing of community-based environmental work through a fully-integrated resource platform.
The Agency will coordinate across the federal government-EPA regions partnering with federal agencies in focus communities
-to deliver services more efficiently and effectively. EPA will utilize such partnerships to leverage resources and expertise from
across EPA and a range of outside partners to advance economic revitalization through the environmental and health goals of
communities. EPA will look for opportunities for early engagement with state, local, and tribal co-regulators through existing
advisory committees and other forums. The Agency will also continue leadership of and involvement in the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) Community Solutions Taskforce to better access and leverage resources from across federal agencies, and
will strengthen coordination with the Interagency Working Group on Environmental Justice to better integrate EPA priorities
and support and engage communities. In addition, EPA will support and align its work with the activities and priorities of the
President's Task Force on Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks to Children.
:!4 Baseline will be determined in FY 2018

-------
GOAL 2: COOPERATIVE FEDERALISM
32 •	
The Agency will seek to increase the number and type of public
participation platforms it has to ensure that the public can
meaningfully participate in all of EPA's work—including policy
making, regulatory development, outreach, education, and
community engagement.

-------
GOAL 2: COOPERATIVE FEDERALISM
		 33
EPA will work on the E-Enterprise Web Portal's Assistance Gateway, which provides tools and resources for communities to
facilitate two-way communication between the public and environmental agencies. The Agency will determine how EPA, states,
and tribes can most effectively harness and benefit from the recent, rapid development of environmental monitoring technologies
that are smaller, more portable, and less expensive than traditional methods. EPA will pursue innovative technologies without
compromising the accuracy of the information collected. In consultation with state, tribal, and local partners, EPA will make
monitoring data publicly available, providing context and relevancy. EPA will support the E-Enterprise Assistance Gateway that
will enhance collaboration and communication with communities. The Agency will seek to increase the number and type of public
participation platforms it has to ensure that the public can meaningfully participate in all of EPA's work—including policy making,
regulatory development, outreach, education, and community engagement.
EPA will also focus on reducing the FOIA backlog the Agency has built up over the years, and enhancing the FOIA process. The
complexity and volume of electronic documents required to be searched, collected, and reviewed has increased overtime. The
Agency will ensure that it can support the timely searching and collection of electronically-stored information for purposes of
responding to FOIA requests and other information needs in a cost-effective, sustainable manner. This should not only help the
Agency provide the public information requested, but also reduce the fees and lawsuits the Agency incurs from missing FOIA
response deadlines.
External Factors and Emerging Issues
Resources are critical to the expansion of technical assistance directed at communities and state, tribal, and local government
partners that support community-focused engagement and collaboration. Staff must be available for a wide variety of
implementation activities such as direct community engagement and support, intra- and inter-agency coordination, and
partnering effectively with states and tribes.
In addition, the challenges of coordinating across offices within EPA and with other federal agencies can inhibit the identification
and delivery of creative solutions and services that can lead to tangible results for communities and a more effective leveraging of
government resources. EPA recognizes the need to communicate successes and achievements related to this work, both to market
its effectiveness and to teach new partners and practitioners how to replicate successful models and approaches.

-------
Goa
Rule of Law &
Process

-------
Administer the law, as Congress intended, to refocus
the Agency on its statutory obligations under the law.
EPA will seek to reinvigorate the rule
of law and process as it administers the
environmental laws as Congress intended,
and to refocus the Agency on its basic
statutory obligations. To accomplish this,
EPA will work cooperatively with states
and tribes to ensure compliance with the
law, as well as to create consistency and
certainty for the regulated community.
Of course, EPA will take civil or criminal
enforcement action against violators of
environmental laws.
A robust enforcement program is
critically important for addressing
violations and promoting deterrence,
and supports the Agency's mission
of protecting human health and the
environment. Ensuring compliance with
the law also ensures consistency and
certainty for the regulated community
so it has a complete understanding
of the impact of proposed actions on
human health, the environment, and the
economy, and a clear path and timeline
to achieve that compliance. EPA's policies
and rules will reflect common sense,
consistent with the Agency's statutory
authorities, and provide greater
regulatory and economic certainty for
the public. EPA will enforce the rule of
law in a timely manner and take action
against those that violate environmental
laws to the detriment of human health or
the environment.
One of EPA's highest priorities must be
to create consistency and certainty for
the regulated community. Consistency
in how the laws and regulations are
applied across the country is part of that
process. EPA will undertake a variety
of efforts to ensure that consistency
in application of laws and regulations
is evaluated and addressed, while
respecting the unique circumstances of
each state and tribe.
EPA recognizes the importance of
applying rules and policies consistently
as well as creating certainty by meeting
the statutory deadlines that are required
for EPA's actions. The rule of law must
also be built on the application of robust
science that is conducted to help the
Agency meet its mission and support
the states and tribes in achieving
their environmental goals. Research,
in conjunction with user-friendly
applications needed to apply the science
to real-world problems, will help move
EPA and the states forward in making
timely decisions based on science.
Carrying out this goal requires that
EPA improve the efficiency of its
internal business and administrative
operations. First, EPA's business
operations, specifically the vast
permitting processes established by
the different environmental statutes,
are key to ensuring economic growth
and human health and environmental
protection. Over the next five years,
EPA will modernize its permitting
practices to increase the timeliness of
reviews and decisions, while working
more collaboratively, transparently, and
cost effectively to achieve the Agency's
mission. The second part of improving
internal operations includes reducing
EPA's overhead and creating more
efficient and effective administrative
processes (e.g., acquisition) that allow
EPA to accomplish its core mission work.

-------
GOAL 3: RULE OF LAW & PROCESS
36 •	
Objective 3.1
Compliance with the Law
Timely enforce environmental laws to increase
compliance rates and promote cleanup of contaminated
sites through the use of all of EPA's compliance assurance
tools, especially enforcement actions to address
environmental violations.
Introduction
For decades, the protections mandated
by federal environmental laws have been
essential to the growth of American
prosperity. Noncompliance with those
laws diminishes shared prosperity
and unfairly tilts the field of economic
competition in favor of those that skirt
the law. To carry out its mission to protect
human health and the environment, EPA,
in collaboration with state and tribal
partners, relies on a strong national
compliance assurance and cleanup
enforcement program. An effective
enforcement program is key to ensuring
that the ambitious goals of the nation's
environmental statutes are realized.
EPA's enforcement priorities remain
focused on cleaning up hazardous
waste sites and addressing the most
significant violations consistent with
EPA's statutory authorities. EPA
takes the overwhelming majority of
its enforcement actions in programs
that are: (1) not delegable to a state
or tribe; (2) in states or tribes that
have not sought authorization to
implement a delegable program; or (3)
in states or tribes that do not have the
resources or expertise, or that seek
assistance from the Agency—and these
actions are taken in coordination with
the states and tribes. For states and
tribes with authorized programs, EPA,
states, and tribes share enforcement
responsibility, with primary enforcement
responsibility residing with the state35
or tribe. Further, EPA is responsible
for addressing violations that occur
in Indian country in the absence of an
approved program.
Even in states or tribes authorized
to implement a program, EPA serves
a critical role in addressing serious
national noncompliance problems, such
as those affecting multiple states or
tribes, and in serving as a backstop for
instances when a state or tribe does
not timely or appropriately address
serious noncompliance. EPA also may
assist a state or tribe in remedying
noncompliance problems when the
state or tribe is unable to address the
problem because it lacks the capability
or resources, such as in actions against
other federal or state agencies. For
some serious violations, the Agency
and states or tribes may decide that
the best approach is a joint enforcement
action. Further, EPA will take immediate
action when there is an environmental
emergency, such as an oil spill or chemical
:!S See e.g., ECOS Resolution 98-9, U.S. EPA Enforcement in Delegated States (revised September 28, 2016), describing the EPA and state roles in enforcement
in authorized states: "WHEREAS, U.S. EPA and the States have bilaterally developed policy agreements which reflect those roles and which recognize the
primary responsibility for enforcement action resides with the States, with U.S. EPA taking enforcement action principally where the State requests assistance
is unwilling or unable to take timely and appropriate enforcement actions, or in actions of national interest, or in actions involving multiple state jurisdictions."

-------
GOAL 3: RULE OF LAW & PROCESS
	• 37
accident. Through the State Review
Framework (SRF), EPA periodically
reviews authorized state compliance
monitoring and enforcement programs,
using criteria agreed upon by states, to
evaluate performance against national
compliance monitoring or enforcement
program standards. When states do
not achieve standards, the Agency
works with them to make progress.
However, EPA may also take a lead
implementation role when authorized
states have a documented history of
failure to make progress toward meeting
national standards. In all of its work,
EPA's enforcement program strives to
address noncompliance in an efficient
and timely manner, applying a broad
range of enforcement and compliance
tools to achieve the goal of reducing
noncompliance.
Strategic Measures
SM-17 By September 30, 2022, reduce the average time from violation identification to
correction36.
SM-18 By September 30, 2022, increase the environmental law compliance rate37.
Strategies for Achieving the Objective
Civil Enforcement
The overall goal of EPA's civil enforcement program is to maximize compliance with the nation's environmental laws and regulations to
protect human health and the environment. The Agency works closely with the U.S. Department of Justice, states, tribes, territories,
and local agencies to ensure consistent and fair enforcement of all major environmental statutes. EPA will seek to strengthen
environmental partnerships with its state and tribal partners, encourage regulated entities to correct violations rapidly, ensure that
violators do not realize an economic benefit from noncompliance, and pursue enforcement to deter future violations.
EPA recognizes that significant environmental progress has been made over the years, much of it due to enforcement efforts
by EPA, states, tribes, and local communities. To maximize compliance over the next five years, the Agency will refocus efforts
toward areas with significant noncompliance issues and where enforcement can address the most substantial impacts to human
health and the environment. EPA also recognizes the role of states and tribes as the primary implementers, where authorized by
EPA to implement the federal statutes, and will focus compliance assurance and enforcement resources on direct implementation
responsibilities, addressing the most significant violations, and assisting authorized states and tribes in meeting national standards. For
example, the Agency will provide expertise and implement compliance monitoring strategies that will ensure a level playing field. EPA
is responsible for direct implementation for programs that are not delegable or where a state or tribe has not sought or obtained
the authority to implement a particular program (or program component). Examples of non-delegable programs include the CAA
::ti Baseline will be determined in FY 2018.
:!7 This concept will be piloted by focusing initially on increasing the percentage of Clean Water Act (CWA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) permittees not in significant noncompliance with their permit limits to 88% from a baseline of 76% from Q4 FY 2016 to Q3 FY 2017. Other
program areas may be included in this strategic measure during the FY 2018-2022 timeframe.

-------
GOAL 3: RULE OF LAW & PROCESS
38 •	
mobile source program, pesticide labeling and registration under FIFRA, virtually all compliance assurance and enforcement in Indian
country, enforcement of the federal Superfund cleanup program, and enforcement of non-delegated portions of various other laws,
including RCRA, the CWA, and stratospheric ozone under the CAA. EPA also will pursue enforcement actions at federal facilities
where significant violations are discovered, will ensure that federal facilities are held to the same standards as the private sector, and
will provide technical and scientific support to states and tribes with authorized programs.
Criminal Enforcement
EPA's Criminal Enforcement program enforces the nation's environmental laws through targeted investigation of criminal conduct
committed by individual and corporate defendants that threaten public health and the environment. Over the next five years, EPA
will collaborate and coordinate with the U.S. Department of Justice and state, tribal, and local law enforcement counterparts to
ensure that the Agency responds to violations as quickly and effectively as possible. EPA enforces the nation's environmental laws
through targeted investigation of criminal conduct committed by individual and corporate defendants that threatens human health
and the environment. The Agency plays a critical role across the country since states and tribes have limited capacity to prosecute
environmental crimes. The Agency will focus resources on the most egregious environmental cases (i.e., those presenting
significant human health and environmental impacts).
Cleanup Enforcement
Through the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA, or Superfund), EPA will
facilitate prompt site cleanup and use an "enforcement first" approach that maximizes the participation of liable and viable parties
in performing and paying for cleanups. The Agency will protect communities by ensuring that potentially responsible parties (PRPs)
conduct cleanups at Superfund sites, preserving federal taxpayer dollars for sites where there are no viable contributing parties,
and by recovering costs if the EPA expends Superfund-appropriated dollars to clean up sites. EPA also will address liability concerns
that can be a barrier to potential reuse. Addressing the risks posed by Superfund sites and returning them to productive use
strengthens the economy and spurs economic growth.
Over the next five years, EPA will focus its resources on the highest priority sites, particularly those that may present an
immediate risk to human health or the environment. In accordance with the Superfund Task Force Report, the Agency will
improve and revitalize the Superfund program to ensure that contaminated sites across the country are remediated to protect
human health and the environment, and returned to beneficial reuse as expeditiously as possible. At federally-owned sites, EPA will
also focus on resolving formal disputes under the federal facility agreements.
External Factors and Emerging Issues
Advanced monitoring technology and information technology are rapidly evolving, and advances in these fields offer great
opportunities for improving the ability of EPA, states, and tribes to ensure compliance. EPA, states, and tribes do, however, face
challenges in keeping up with the rapid pace of change in these technologies. In addition, social science research and knowledge
may offer innovative ways to promote compliance. EPA is partnering with states and tribes to help prepare for and use these
advanced monitoring technologies, consistent with statutory and regulatory obligations. The Agency will collaborate with ECOS
and state associations to maximize the use of these technologies and modernize programs. EPA, in collaboration with states,
is working with the academic community to identify new ways to improve compliance. For example, EPA will work with states
and academics to pilot and evaluate innovative compliance methods.38 EPA will work with states to integrate advanced pollution
monitoring and information technology into Agency work.
:!t: ECOS Resolution 17-2: On the Value of Diverse and Innovative Approaches to Advance Compliance (2017)

-------
GOAL 3: RULE OF LAW & PROCESS
	• 39
Objective 3.2
Create Consistency and Certainty
Outline exactly what is expected of the regulated
community to ensure good stewardship and positive
environmental outcomes.
Introduction
The regulatory framework is inherently
dynamic. As part of its statutory
obligations, EPA is required to publish
many regulations within a set timeframe
each year that implement environmental
programs and assist the Agency
in meeting its core mission. These
regulations address newly mandated
responsibilities as well as updates and
revisions to existing regulations. As
EPA meets its obligations to protect
human health and the environment
through regulatory action, it must
also meet another key responsibility
- minimizing "regulatory uncertainty"
that unnecessarily causes businesses
and communities to face delays,
planning inefficiencies, and compliance
complexities that impede environmental
protection, economic growth, and
development. EPA will employ a set
of strategies to reduce regulatory
uncertainty while continuing to improve
human health and environmental
outcomes consistent with the Agency's
authorities as established by Congress
and while considering unique state, tribal,
and local circumstances. These strategies,
which reflect EPA's commitment to
cooperative federalism and commitment
to the rule of law, will also help advance
Agency goals for streamlining and
modernizing permitting and enhancing
shared accountability.
SM-19 By September 30, 2022, meet 100% of legal deadlines imposed on EPA.
SM-20 By September 30, 2022, eliminate unnecessary or duplicative reporting burdens to the
regulated community by 10,000,000 hours39.
Strategies for Achieving the Objective
As EPA issues new or revised regulations, businesses and individuals can find it challenging to know which rules apply to them and
to adjust their compliance strategies. Over the next five years, EPA will reinvigorate its approach to regulatory development and
prioritize meeting its statutory deadlines to ensure that expectations for the regulated community and the public are clear and
comprehensive and that Agency actions are defensible and consistent with its authorities. The Agency will use new approaches
and flexible tools to minimize regulatory uncertainty and will communicate more comprehensively to realize more consistent
:!Q Baseline is estimated at 173,849,665 information collection and reporting hours.

-------
GOAL 3: RULE OF LAW & PROCESS
40 		
and better environmental outcomes, while centering work on statutory and regulatory obligations. EPA will strengthen working
relationships with industry sectors to better understand their needs and challenges in implementing Agency requirements and with
communities to understand their concerns. This knowledge will enable the Agency to develop better policies and regulations to
protect human health and the environment in line with the authorities given to EPA by Congress.
On average, the EPA faces approximately 20 legal challenges under the various environmental statutes each year that assert that
the Agency missed a statutory or regulatory deadline for taking an action or unreasonably delayed taking an action. In addition,
the Agency faces nearly the same number of iegal challenges under FOIA for failure to comply with the deadlines in that law.
Responding to these challenges often diverts significant EPA resources away from priority activities, and could impact the Agency's
ability to fulfill its commitments. In order to facilitate achievement of this goal, EPA will undertake a systematic mapping of the
processes associated with these obligations and implement improvements where needed.
In addition, EPA will develop and engage stakeholders in reviewing a draft base catalog of responsibilities that statutes require
EPA to perform in programs delegated to states and tribes. The base catalog, to be complete by 2019 and subsequently updated
as necessary, will provide EPA a foundation to make decisions that reduce contradictory policy determinations at headquarters
and across regions. It will also support EPA cooperative federalism commitments aimed at minimizing duplication and overlap
among regions, headquarters, states, and tribes. This effort also leverages the commitment that EPA is making under cooperative
federalism to identify, for all environmental media, an inventory and timeline for state-led permits that EPA reviews.
The Agency will ensure consistent implementation of policies across all regions. EPA will also work towards more cooperative
decision making between EPA's regions and headquarters, when necessary. EPA will review regulatory guidance documents to
identify key opportunities and will clarify and realign Agency approaches to improve consistency and clarity. EPA will strengthen
working relationships with states, tribes, and local communities to transfer knowledge, leveraging its commitments under

-------
GOAL 3: RULE OF LAW & PROCESS
	¦ 41
cooperative federalism, such as collaboration under E-Enterprise for the Environment. EPA will make available to states and tribes
tools or services designed by other federal agencies, states, tribes, or local communities that enhance efficiency and reduce burden
on the regulated community while ensuring protection of human health and the environment.
EPA will work with states and tribes to achieve this objective without overburdening those entities with costly unnecessary
reporting systems and technology. Building on efforts to date, such as under E-Enterprise, EPA will collaborate with its partners on
systems and services, including but not limited to:
•	E-reporting: A systematic digital approach that enables states, tribes, and the regulated community to move from paper-based
to electronic reporting.
•	The Environmental Information Exchange Network: Managed under the collaborative leadership of EPA, states, territories,
and tribes, a communication, data, and services platform for submitting and sharing environmental information among
partners to foster informed decision making.
•	SPeCS for SIPs (State Plan Electronic Collection System for State Implementation Plans): A web-based system for authorized
state, tribal, and local governments to submit and manage SIPs under the Clean Air Act.
External Factors and Emerging Issues
A number of factors and emerging issues may impede the Agency's ability to meet this strategic objective. Sustainable resource levels
and a strong workforce are critical to success. Proposing and finalizing regulations is often a multi-year process, which can be challenged
by lawsuits causing further delays. For example, technical complexity also creates challenges in meeting aggressive deadlines.

-------
GOAL 3: RULE OF LAW & PROCESS
42 •	
Objective 3.3
Prioritize Robust Science
Refocus the EPA's robust research and scientific anal/sis
to inform policy making.
/ • \
/	O	\
/	1*1	\
	f1 Jol !	
l	/o \	i
I	/ O ~\	I
introduction
EPA will identify, assess, conduct, and
apply the best available science to address
current and future environmental hazards,
develop new approaches, and improve
the scientific foundation for environmental
protection decisions. EPA conducts
problem-driven, interdisciplinary research
to address specific environmental risks,
and is committed to using science and
innovation to reduce risks to human
health and the environment, based on
needs identified by EPA's program and
regional offices and as well as state and
tribal partners. Specifically, over the next
five years, the Agency will strengthen
alignment of its research to support EPA
programs, regions, states, and tribes in
accomplishing their top human health
and environmental protection priorities
for improved air quality, clean and safe
water, revitalized land, and chemical
safety40. Working closely with ECOS
and its subsidiary, the Environmental
Research Institute of the States (ERIS),
the Agency will strive to connect state
research needs with Agency priorities,
and work to improve communication
of research results. Through the public-
private coalition Interstate Technology
and Regulatory Council41, EPA will
encourage the adoption of innovative
technologies and solutions. The Agency
will also emphasize the translation of its
work products for end user application
and feedback.
EPA research will be reviewed by
various scientific advisory boards (e.g.,
Board of Scientific Counselors) that
are made up of recognized experts
in various scientific, engineering, and
social science fields and may be from
industry; business; public and private
research institutes or organizations;
academia; federal, state, tribal, and
local governments; nongovernmental
organizations; and other relevant
interest areas.
40	EPA research under Homeland Security supports efforts outlined in Core Mission (Goal 1) objectives.
41	For more information on the Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council, go to http://www.itrcweb.org/.

-------
GOAL 3: RULE OF LAW & PROCESS
	• 43
Strategic Measure
SM-21 By September 30, 2022, increase the number of research products meeting customer needs42.
Strategies for Achieving the Objective
Air Quality
EPA's research will advance the science and provide the information critical to improve air quality and to inform stationary
source regulations; vehicle and fuel standards and certification; emission inventories; air quality assessments; and domestic ozone
actions. The results of Agency research to support air quality program priorities will inform EPA programs; state, tribal, and local
air programs; communities; and individuals about measures and strategies to reduce air pollution. Researchers will publish peer-
reviewed scientific journal articles to disseminate research findings as appropriate and consistent with resource and program needs.
Over the next five years, the Agency will:
•	Deliver state-of-the-art tools for states and tribes to use in identifying effective emission reduction strategies to meet
national ambient air quality standards and enhance air quality measurement methods used to ascertain compliance
with NAAQS.
•	Assess human and ecosystem exposures and effects associated with air pollutants on individual, community, regional, and
global scales.
•	Develop and evaluate approaches to prevent and reduce pollution, particularly sustainable, cost-effective, and innovative
multi-pollutant and sector-based approaches.
•	Provide human exposure and environmental modeling, monitoring, metrics, and information needed to inform air quality
decision making at the state, tribal, and local level.
Safe and Sustainable Water Resources
EPA will develop innovative, cost-effective solutions to current, emerging, and long-term water resource challenges for complex
chemical and biological contaminants. Using a systems approach to develop scientific and technological solutions for protecting
human health and aquatic ecosystems, EPA researchers partner with program experts; federal and state agencies; tribes; local
communities; academia; nongovernmental organizations; and private stakeholders.
42 Baseline will be determined in FY 2018

-------
GOAL 3: RULE OF LAW & PROCESS
44 •	
Over the next five years, the Agency will:
•	Support safe drinking water by focusing research on assessing the distribution, composition, remediation, and health impacts
of known and emerging chemical and biological contaminants.
•	Improve methods for fast and efficient waterborne pathogen monitoring in recreational waters.
•	Investigate health impacts from exposure to harmful algal/cyanobacteria toxins, and develop innovative methods to monitor,
characterize, and predict blooms for early action.
•	Support states and tribes in meeting their priorities and setting water quality and aquatic life thresholds.
•	Assist states, tribes, communities, and utilities in addressing stormwater and wastewater infrastructure needs through applied
modeling, technical assistance, and capture-and-reuse risk assessments.
•	Provide water reuse research support on potable and non-potable use guidance for states and tribes.
Sustainable and Healthy Communities
EPA will conduct research to support regulatory activities and protocol development for the National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency Plan and provide on-demand technical support at cleanup sites managed by federal, state
or tribal governments, as well as assistance during emergencies. The Agency conducts health, environmental engineering, and
ecological research and prepares planning and analysis tools for localities nationwide to use in facilitating regulatory compliance
and improving environmental and health outcomes.
Over the next five years, EPA will:
•	Provide technical support to the states and tribes through technical support centers for remediating CERCLA-designated
contaminated sites and returning them to productive use.
•	Assist regional, state, tribal, and local leaders in reducing costs and setting science-based cleanup levels in areas designated
under CERCLA.
•	Characterize sites and contaminants released from leaking underground storage tanks identified under the LUST Trust Fund.
•	Work with the ECOS/ERIS to evaluate the causal relationships between ecosystem goods and services and human health,
and to document these relationships using EnviroAtlas.
•	Assess the impact of pollution (e.g., health impact assessments) on such vulnerable groups as children, tribes, environmental
justice communities, and other susceptible populations.
Chemical Safety
EPA will evaluate and predict impacts from chemical use and disposal, and provide states and tribes with information, tools, and
methods to make better informed, more timely decisions about the thousands of chemicals in the United States. The Agency will
produce innovative tools that accelerate the pace of data-driven evaluations, enable knowledge-based decisions that protect human
health, and advance the science required to anticipate and solve problems.

-------
GOAL 3: RULE OF LAW & PROCESS
	• 45
Over the next five years, EPA will:
•	Provide tools to more efficiently and cost-effectively evaluate the biological activity and health risks of chemicals and reduce the
use of toxicity tests to animals.
•	Use ToxCast/Tox21 data to develop high-throughput risk assessments, particularly for chemicals for which adequate risk
assessment information has been historically unavailable.
•	Develop online software tools to provide information on thousands of chemicals and integrate health, environmental, and
exposure data to support regulatory and prioritization decisions.
•	Explore how high-throughput exposure and hazard information can be combined to predict the potential for exposure and risk
to susceptible subpopulations.
•	Conduct nanoparticle research by using life-cycle analyses, evaluating impacts on ecosystem health, and supporting the
development of safer nanomaterials in private industry.
Human Health Risk Assessment
EPA also will focus on the science of assessments that inform Agency, state, and tribal decisions and policies. These risk assessments
provide the research and technical support needed to ensure safety of chemicals in the marketplace, revitalize and return land to
communities, provide clean and safe water, and work with states and tribes to improve air quality.
Over the next five years, EPA will:
•	Develop a portfolio of chemical evaluation products that use the best available science for use by EPA, states, tribes, and other
federal agencies.
•	Provide research and scientific support for proper TSCA implementation, as Congress intended.
•	Develop assessment products, peer-reviewed toxicity values, and advanced exposure assessment tools to help inform
Superfund and hazardous waste cleanups as required by RCRA and CERCLA.
•	Provide scientific support to the risk and technology reviews conducted under the CAA.
•	Provide integrated science assessments (ISAs) to support decisions to retain or revise the national ambient air quality
standards. ISAs also inform benefit-cost and other analyses conducted by state, tribal, and local officials to support
implementation of air quality management programs.
•	Provide research and technical support to deliver safe drinking water by evaluating exposures to and health impacts of known
and emerging chemical and biological contaminants.
•	Work with states and tribes on research and development of new assessment technologies.
External Factors and Emerging Issues
EPA faces a number of challenges in its commitment to conducting robust science. For example, aging information technology
infrastructure presents a risk to information security and limits the capacity for information management. Recruiting and
maintaining a strong workforce with appropriate scientific and technical skillsets are also critical to EPA's research efforts.

-------
GOAL 3: RULE OF LAW & PROCESS
46 •	
Objective 3.4
Streamline and Modernize
Issue permits more quickly and modernize our permitting
and reporting systems.
Introduction
EPA implements a host of environmental
statutes that affect the regulated
community. Permitting requirements
under these statutes can impose a
variety of costs, including direct costs
and opportunity costs related to
uncertainty, delay, and cancellation.
Delays in the approval of permits and
modifications by federal, state, or tribal
permitting authorities can postpone or
prevent manufacturers from building,
expanding, or beginning operations, even
if the affected operations ultimately may
be deemed suitable as proposed. Delays
can also impact construction of major
infrastructure projects. EPA is committed
to speeding up the processing of permits
and modifications to create certainty for
the business community, leading to more
jobs, increased economic prosperity,
and streamlined permit renewals, which
incorporate up-to-date information and
requirements more quickly, thereby
improving environmental protection.
Further, EPA will continue to convert
permit applications and reports that
rely on paper submissions to electronic
processing in order to reduce
burden, shorten the wait for approval
decisions, and increase the opportunity
for public transparency.
Strategic Measure
SM-22 By September 30, 2022, reach all permitting-related decisions within six months.
Strategies for Achieving the Objective
Over the next five years, EPA will systematically collect and report permitting data for each of its permitting programs. The
Agency will employ business process improvement strategies, such as Lean, to increase efficiencies in all permitting processes and
meet our commitments. The Agency will also work with states and use Lean techniques to streamline the review of state-issued
permits. Solutions may include conducting earlier triage and communications, conducting Agency reviews in parallel with public
reviews, andyor focusing reviews where they add the most value.
EPA will consider where policy changes can improve permitting efficiency without sacrificing environmental results. Examples
include expanding the scope of minor permit modifications to reduce the number of permit reviews required, reinvigorating
the use of plant-wide applicability limits (PALs) to reduce unnecessary permitting transactions, and increasing states' ability to
incorporate federal regulations by reference, enabling them to adjust quickly and efficiently to new regulatory provisions.

-------
GOAL 3: RULE OF LAW & PROCESS
	• 47
EPA will modernize permitting and reporting processes through efforts such as E-Enterprise for the Environment, a shared
governance model with EPA, states, and tribes. EPA will work with states and tribes to achieve this objective without
overburdening those entities with costly unnecessary reporting systems and technology. Building on efforts to date, EPA will
collaborate with its partners on the following systematic process improvements:
•	E-Enterprise Web Portal: A web portal that allows the states, tribes, regulated community, and EPA to transact business, such
as permitting and reporting, and provides easy access to needed information.
•	E-permitting: An online system to ensure the ability to apply for, track the status of, and receive a permit electronically.
External Factors and Emerging Issues
Sustainable resource levels for states, tribes, and EPA are critical to efforts to streamline and modernize permitting processes.
Support from states and tribes, including state and tribal capacity for maintaining and increasing delegation, is also critical to
streamlining and modernizing permitting processes. The global shift to digital services for communication and transaction raises
expectations of EPA stakeholders and provides more robust approaches and technologies for developing electronic services.
EPA will modernize permitting and reporting processes through
efforts such as E-Enterprise for the Environment, a shared
governance model with EPA, states, and tribes.

-------
GOAL 3: RULE OF LAW & PROCESS
48 •	
Objective 3.5
Improve Efficiency and Effectiveness
Provide proper leadership and internal operations
management to ensure that the Agency is fulfilling
its mission.
Introduction
To support its mission to protect
human health and the environment,
EPA will improve the efficiency and
effectiveness of its business processes.
Focus areas will include financial, facility,
human resource, contract, grant, and
information technology/information
management. EPA will improve its future
workforce, modernize and streamline its
business practices, and take advantage
of new collaborative and cost-effective
tools and technologies. The Agency
will build a modern and secure work
environment that will protect critical
information and support its efforts to
address the environmental problems
of the 21st century. EPA will work to
alleviate challenges associated with
outdated or non-existent policies, tension
between centralized and decentralized
approaches, myriad federal acquisition
and grants requirements, complex
processes, and fluctuating levels of
expertise across Agency programs.
Strategic Measures
SM-23 By September 30, 2022, reduce unused office and warehouse space by 850,641 square feet43.
SM-24 By September 30, 2022, reduce procurement processing times by achieving 100% of
procurement action lead times (PALT)44.
SM-25 By September 30, 2022, improve 250 operational processes.
SM-26 By September 30, 2022, increase enterprise adoption of shared services by four45.
43
44
45
Baseline is 5,264,846 square feet as of FY 2017.
Baseline for FY 2017 is under development.
Baseline is 5 administrative systems/operations shared services in FY 2017.

-------
GOAL 3: RULE OF LAW & PROCESS
	• 49
Strategies for Achieving the Objective
EPA will modernize and improve business processes and operations to promote transparency, efficiency, and effectiveness;
enhance collaborative, results-driven partnerships with internal and external business partners; recruit, develop, and maintain a
highly-skilled, diverse, and engaged workforce; and improve the capabilities and cost-effectiveness of its information technology (IT)
and information management (IM) systems.
EPA will apply Lean principles and will leverage input from customer-focused councils, advisory groups, surveys, workgroups,
acquisition partnership initiatives, technical user groups, portfolio reviews, and federal advisory committees to identify business
process streamlining opportunities. To improve the efficiency and cost effectiveness of its operations, EPA will standardize and
streamline internal business processes in its acquisition and grants processes and systems, and use additional federal and/or
internal shared services when supported by business case analysis.
EPA will ensure its workforce is positioned to accomplish the Agency's mission effectively by providing access to quality training
and development opportunities that will improve staff's and managers' skills, knowledge, and performance, and prepare them to
capitalize on opportunities that advance progress. EPA will improve its workforce planning and management, strengthen its Senior
Executive Service, and focus on developing and maintaining a highly-skilled technical workforce.
EPA also will transform and modernize its information systems, tools, and processes to improve how the Agency collaborates
both internally and with external stakeholders. EPA will enhance the power of information by delivering on-demand data to the
right people at the right time. To enable the Agency, its partners, and the public effectively to acquire, generate, manage, use,
and share information-a critical resource in protecting human health and the environment-EPA will improve its IT/IM capabilities
and customer experiences. EPA will employ enterprise risk management and financial data analytics to support data management
decision making, using the enterprise risk management framework mandated by OMB Circular A-123.
To ensure that critical environmental and human health information is adequately protected, EPA will strengthen its cybersecurity
posture. The Agency will focus on implementing two key cybersecurity priorities—the mandated federal-government-wide
Continuous Diagnostics and Mitigation (CDM) effort, and the complementary EPA-specific Cyber Risk Mitigation Projects
(CRMPs). These two priorities introduce or improve upon dozens of cybersecurity capabilities, enhance the Agency's ability to
respond to threats, and improve EPA's privacy posture via the Privacy Act of 1974. EPA will work closely with the Department of
Homeland Security and other partners in implementing CDM capabilities.

-------
GOAL 3: RULE OF LAW & PROCESS
50 •	
To better understand complex interactions between pollutants and the environment and address the environmental problems of
the 21st century effectively and efficiently, EPA and its partners analyze large volumes of data. EPA will develop a comprehensive
data management strategy that addresses the collection, management, and use of data generated both internally and from
external partners including states, tribes, grantees, the regulated community, and citizen science. The Agency will deploy new data
analysis, data visualization, and geospatial tools in a Cloud-based framework to enable analysis and provide the basis for informed
decision making.
Environmental decision making across media programs requires access to high-quality data and analytics. EPA will build shared
IT services, maximizing the benefits of our investments and ensuring consistency and scalability in tools and services. Over the
next five years, EPA programs that receive submissions from outside the Agency, whether from the reporting community, states,
tribes, or local governments, will rely increasingly on centrally-developed and maintained information services, decreasing the
volume of computer code each program must develop and maintain. Shared services will reduce reporting burden for submitting
entities and improve data quality for EPA. EPA programs, states, and tribes must establish a common catalog of shared services
and agree to a minimum set of common standards and practices.
The Agency will enhance its extensive information resources by designing an enterprise-wide information architecture that will
facilitate the electronic management of data and information, as well as multimodal access, effective searching, and ease of use.
The Agency's future information management architecture will support official recordkeeping requirements, as well as daily
document management, business processes, information access, and legal needs of EPA employees and organizations, while
also being flexible, scalable, and cost effective.
External Factors and Emerging Issues
EPA faces a number of factors that may impede its ability to promote effective and efficient internal operations. The Agency's
ability to attract and retain staff skilled in human resources, IT/I M, cybersecurity, and acquisition management and staff with
scientific and technical expertise is a continuing challenge in improving Agency operations. A lack of category-focused skills and
business acumen can negatively affect strategic sourcing decisions. Myriad federal acquisition and grant requirements, complex
processes, and varying levels of expertise across Agency programs often prevent the timely awarding of contract and grant
vehicles to meet Agency demands. EPA must increase its competencies in these areas through a robust training program for
staff and managers.
Without standard business processes, EPA cannot achieve its objectives. For example, tension between local needs and Agency-
wide strategies may result in missed opportunities to make effective strategic sourcing decisions. This not only impedes Agency
efforts to modernize business processes and streamline IT infrastructure, but also affects the ability of government shared
service providers to serve additional customers and use standard software to achieve efficiencies and cost savings. Furthermore,
continually changing IT/IM and security requirements and variation among states and tribes require development of a holistic
"Enterprise-Level Vision and Data Strategy" that optimizes both business processes and solutions; aligns all data programs,
resources, and budgets; and strengthens the Agency's enterprise risk strategies. Demands for IT/IM services will continue to
grow, due to the increasing volume of environmental data and increased expectations of other agencies, regulated entities, the
public, and EPA staff. As cybersecurity risks evolve, protecting EPA's information assets will continue to be a priority.

-------
GOAL 3: RULE OF LAW & PROCESS
	* 51
= he Agency will build a modern and secure
work environment that will protect critical
information and support its efforts
to address the environmental
problems of the 21st century.
B5rL
o
6 I
5 I
f


-------

-------
photos: cover/back	Nate McMichael - Chugach State Park, Alaska
inside cover	EPA Staff Submission - Washington, DC Metro Area
page 2	Eric Vance - Administrator Pruitt
page 6	David lacono - Lewes, Delaware
page 21	Eric Vance - Pesticide Application
page 24	Eric Vance - Meeting
page 32	Eric Vance - Gully Branch Tree Farm - Cochran, Georgia
page 34	Eric Vance - Washington Monument
page 40-41	Paymon Danesh - Glacier National Park, Montana
page 51	Eric Vance - Ariel Rios Building, EPA HQ

-------
Office of the Chief Financial Officer
Office of Planning, Analysis, and Accountability (2721A)
United States Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20460
www.epa.govyplanandbudgetystrategicplan
EPA-190-R-18-003
2018

-------