United States Solid Waste and EPA530-R-97-037f
Environmental Protection Emergency Response NTIS: PB97-177 471
Agency (5305W) June 1992
&EPA Background Document
for Capacity Analysis
for Newly Listed
Wastes and Hazardous
Debris to Support 40
CFR 268 Land Disposal
Restrictions (Final Rule)
Volume 6:
Appendix E - Category 2
Facilities for the F037 and
F038 Capacity Analysis
Printed on paper that contains at /est 20 percent postconsumer fiber
-------
Background Document for Capacity Analysis for
Newly Listed Wastes and Hazardous Debris to
Support 40 CFR 268 Land Disposal Restrictions
(Final Rule)
Volume 6: Appendix E - Category 2 Facilities
for the F037 and FQ38 Capacity Analysis
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Solid Waste
401 M Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C 20460
June 1992
-------
APPENDIX S
CATEGORY 2 FACILITIES
E.l Key Assumptions and Equations Used to Estimate F037/8 Generation for
Category.2 Facilities
E.l.l Composition of F037/8 Vast.es
E.1.2 Solids Settling Equations
E.l,3 Oil and Solids Removal Efficiencies of Wastewater'Units
E.l.4 Impoundaent and Sewer Clean Out Waste Generation
E.l.5 Other Assumptions
E.2 Notation of Assumptions Used in Estimating F037/8 Waste Generation
E.3 Estimates of F037/8 Waste Generation for Category 2 Facilities
[Note: Some Category 2 facilities have declared their information
confidential, and therefore this information Is in the RCRA CBI docket.]
-------
E.l Key Assumptions arid Equations Used to Estimate F037/8 Cent ration for
Category 2 Facilities
To take into account the flow of material (i.e., oil, water, and solids)
in and out of a wastewater treatment unit, the generalized law of the
conservation of mass is used here in the form of a material-balance
calculation. This calculation Involves an accounting for mass flows and
changes in inventory of mass for a system. The material balance for any
wastewater treatment unit can be viewed simply as:
Accumulation in the unit - Unit influent Unit effluent.
Because a downstream wastewater treatment unit receives wastewater
influent from an upstream unit, the material-balance calculations are applied
first to the upstream unit to determine mass and composition of the effluent
from the upstream unit. Then, the material-balance calculations are applied
to the downstream unit using the effluent from the upstream unit as the
influent to the downstream unit.
For example, with a wastewater treatment configuration consisting of an
API separator followed by a IAF unit, the material-balance calculations would
be applied first to the API separator. The calculations would use the amount
and average composition (oil, water, solids) of API separator bottoms
generated, and the solids and oil removal efficiencies of the API separator,
to estimate the amount and composition of effluent from the API separator. A
material balance for the IAF unit would involve using the effluent from the
API separator as the influent to the IAF unit, and the solids and oil removal
efficiencies of the IAF unit, to estimate the F038 waste that is generated in
the IAF unit.
The following sections (E.l.l through E.l.5) discuss additional detail
on the key assumptions and general equations used for estimating F037/8 waste
generation for Category 2 facilities. These assumptions and equations then
are combined in Section E.4 to produce estimates of F037/8 waste.
E.l.l Composition of F037/8 Wastes
Because F037 and F038 wastes are generated by the petroleum refining
industry in units similar in design and purpose to API separators and DAF
units genera ing K0&8 and K051, EPA assuised that the composition of F037 and
F038 wastes, as generated, would be similar to the composition of K051 and
K048 wastes, as generated, respectively.
-------
Therefore, Co estimate F wastes generated in these types of units, EPA
obtained average compositions of K048, K049 (also used in material-balance
calculation), and K051 wastes, as generated, from the following sources:
• U.S. EPA, Assessment of Hazardous Waste Practices in the
Petroleum Retiring Industry, NTJS Report PB-259097, 1976.
• U. S . EPA, En'.'i ronaental Assessment Data Ease for Petroleum
Refining Wastewater and Residuals, EPA 600/2-83-010, 1983.
• 19S6 National Survey of Treat-rnt, Storage, Disposal, and
Recycling Facilities (TSDR Survey),
Waste Type
Oil Content (%)
Water Content (X)
Solids Content (Z)
|K048 (DAF Float)
13
82
5
1 K049 (Slop Oil
| Solids)
4S
40
12
| K051 (API Sludge)
15
.65
20
Furthermore, filters used to remove solids from the wastewater stream (not the
types of filters used to dewater waste sludges) were assumed to generate an
F038 filter cake that is 60 percent solids and oil. This information was
obtained from:
U.S. EPA, Assessment of Hazardous Waste Practices in the
Petroleum Refining Industry. N'T IS Report PB-259097, 1976.
EPA used another assumption to estimate F037/8 wastes that accumulate in
impoundments (see Section E.1.3), The F037/8 listing RIA (discussed in
Chapter 3) estimated that sludges have water contents ranging from 55 to 82
percent. Given this range, EPA assumed that the accumulated sludges were
similar in composition to K051 wastes.
E.1.2 Solids Settling Equations
To be able to determine the amount of solids that settle out in
impoundments and tanks, EPA used the following solids settling calculations
based on McCabe, W. , and Smith, J.C., Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering,
Third Edition, HcGrav Hill book Co., 1976, and then compared the results to
hydraulic retention tine. The calculations below, based on an average
impoundment depth of 20 feet, indicate that the settling time for particles
averaging 0.005 inches in diameter (representative of silt and clay particles)
is approximately one hour.
In free gravitational settling, the terminal velocity of a particle (ut)
is given by:
- j 2g'-r..'P*~7?
J' \| A,Prccf>
-------
vhe re
g - acceleration due to gravity
pP - particle densi ty
p - fluid density
o — particle mass
A,, - projected area of particle perpendicular to flow
Co - Drag coefficient
Assuming that the particles are spherical, and further, that settling
occurs in the Intermediate regioe, then the expression becomes
U(X
where p - fluid viscosity.
Assigning the following values:
Dp - 0.005 In pp - 80 lb/ftJ p. - 0.000672 lb/(ft-sec)
g - 32.14 ft/sec2 p - 62.4 lb/ft5
results In:
u - 0.153x!32.14)° " (0 .005/12) '¦» (80-62.4)
' (62.4!° "*!0. 000672)""
. 0 .153X11. 7SX1 ¦ IX1Q-X1.66 .0 ,onfc/aec
For a basin depth of 20 feet, settling time - 20/(0.013x60) - 25 minutes
In reality, the particles will not attain terminal velocity immediately;
therefore, the settling time is assuaed to be closer to one hour.
E.1,3 Oil and Solids Removal Efficiencies of Wastewater Units
Oil and solids removal efficiencies of wastewater units are used in the
material-balance calculations because these efficiencies determine the anount
of sludges generated by those units, and the composition of wastewaters
leaving the system. The table below presents these efficiencies.
-------
Wastewater Treatment
Unit
Oil Removal Efficiency
(*)
Solids Removal
Efficiency (%)
API and OSW Separator
75
SO
CPI Separator
85
70
DAF Unit
85
50
IAF Unit
85
50
Average oil and solids reaoval efficiencies for API separators and DAF
unics are based on the following publications:
* U.S. EPA, Assessment of Hazardous Waste Practices in the
Fetroleun; Refining Industry. NTIS Report PB-259097, 1976.
• Hacknan, E.E.. Toxic Orr.anle Chemicals Destruction and Waste
Treatment, ,'irves Data Corporation. 1978.
CPI separator average oil and solids removal efficiencies are based on
an average of the API separator oil and solid removal efficiencies, and
removal efficiencies of high-performance CPI systems provided by Steve Hall of
Quantek, Incorporated (these units are capable of removing 90 percent solids
and 95 percent oil).
1AF separators average oil and solids removal efficiencies are based on
the U.S. EPA report, Assessment of Hazardous Waste Practices in the Petroleum
Refining Industry. NTIS Report PB-259097, 1976.
Oil/water/solids separators, of which the API separator is one, are
assumed to have the sane oil and solids removal efficiencies as API
separators.
E.1.6 Impoundment and Sewer Clean Out Waste Generation
Impoundments
For Category 2-facilities, EPA obtained the surface area of impoundments
affected by the F037/8 listing froa the PRDB (see Section E.3). Using
material-balance calculations, EPA calculated the settling and accumulation of
F037 sludges in impoundments between primary and secondary separation and
after primary treatment (but before secondary treatment). Material-balance
calculations determine the amount of sludge accumulated each year in these
impoundments. For impoundments equal to or greater than three seres (or
131,000 ft2, or 2,620,000 ft3, for 20 feet deep surface impoundments), which
EPA assumed are cleaned out an average of every five years (from the F037/8
Listing RIA), the amount cf sludge accumulated each year was multiplied by
five to obtain the amount cf accumulated F wastes generated from clean outs.
For impoundments less than three acres, which EPA assumed are cleaned out
annually, the amount of sludge accumulated each year was included in the
routine F waste generation for the facility. The material-balance approach,
however, was not able to estimate the quantity of F037 sludges accumulated in
impoundments upstream of primary treatment (because the material-balance
-------
calculations start at the first wastewater treatment unit, which Is typically
an API and CPI separator); therefore, EPA ust-d information in the F037/8 RIA
and data submitted (see attached) by ITEX (a construction/remediation
contractor specializing in large scale closures such as surface impoundments)
to estimate F037 waste generation from clean out of impoundments upstream of
primary treatment.
According to the F037/8 Listing RIA, sludges accumulate to an average
d«.pth of one foot before clean out (impoundments average five years between
clean outs). Data provided by ITEX, however, {shown on the next page)
Indicate that sludges accumulate to an average depth of three feet before
clean-out or closure. EPA, therefore, used an average sludge depth of two
feet for clean out waste generation calculations, because sooe refineries have
likely cleaned out their impoundments recently and therefore would not have
accumulated as much waste as wna found by ITEX. The calculations for waste
generation consist of multiplying sludge depth by the impoundment's surface
area and by the density of the sludge (assumed to be 63 pounds per cubic
feet). For impoundments before primary treatment that are equal to or greater
than three acres, which EPA assumed they are cleaned out an average of every
"five years, EPA used a sludge depth of two feet to calculate the quantity of
accumulated F wastes generated from clean outs.
Sewers
F037 wastes are also generated from sewer clean outs. EPA estimated
sewer clean out for Category 2 facili:ies based on information on sewer waste
generation reported by a Category 1 facility (Texaco, Anacortes). The Agency
assumed that sludges settled in refinery sewers is a function of waste loading
In the wastewaters (i.e., quantity of waste generated divided by wastewater
flow rate), and the size of the refinery (i.e., the larger the refinery the
larger the sewer system). To obtair an estimate of F03? waste generation from
the clean out of Category 2 facilities, EPA compared the waste loading of the
Category 2 facilities to the "known" Category 1 facility, and then applied a
scaling factor based on the Category 2 facilities,
E.1.5. Other Assumptions
For Category 2 facilities that did not submit a TSDR or Generator
Survey, EPA used the wastewater treatment configuration and K048 and K051
generation information presented in the PRDB for the material-balance
calculations. For some facilities, the PRDB indicated that units generating
K048 and K051 exist at the facility, but reported no K048 and K051 generation
amounts (the facility may not have reported these wastes); therefore, to
estimate F037/8 wastes, EPA used average K048 and K051 waste generation rates
based on refinery's crude processing capacity, to estimate K048 and K051 waste
generation used in material-bal.nee calculations. The following average waste
generation rates are presented In EPA's Environmental Assessment Data Base for
Petroleum Refining Wastewater >.nd Residuals. EPA 600/2-83-010, 1983.
-------
Waste Type
Average Waste Generation Rate
{(tons/yrJ/{1,000 barrels/dayj)
| K048
4.0
K049
1.5 j
| K051
2.4
For solids settling calculations, EPA assumed the residence time in flow
equalization tanks, settling tanks, clarificrs, and low rate aeration tanks is
one-half hours based on Information from Keener, F, , Naleo Water Handbook.
Second Edition, McGraw Hill Book Co., 1988.
EPA assuaed the residence in treatment tanks (e.g., flocculation tanks),
and neutralization tanks (or pH adjustment tanks) is 15 minutes based on
Perry, 8., Perry's Cheaical Engineer's Handbook. Sixth Edition, McGraw Hill
Book Co., 1984.
-------
E.2 Notation Of Assumptions Used in Estimating F037/8 Waste Generation
The facility-specific material-balance calculations presented in the
next section uses superscripts (defined on the next page) to denote
information obtained from a specific data source or use of a key assumption.
Superscript number Assumption
.1 Information from Tharsh, L.A., "Annual Refining
Survey," Oil & Gas Journal. March 18, 1991.
2 Information f rca the PRDB.
3 Information from the TSDR Survey.
4 Facility grouping information from the PRD8, (Some
facility groupings have been updated based on
wastewater treatment schematics submitted with the
TSDR Survey.)
5 Assumptions on K waste composition (Section E.l.l).
6 Assumptions on oil and solids removal efficiency of
wastewater units (Section E.1.3).
7 Assumption based on engineering judgment,
8 Assumptions on the average rates of K waste
generation based on crude processing capacity
(Section E.1.5).
9 Assumption on average residence time of in flow
equalization tanks, settling tanks, clarlfiers, and
low rate aeration tanks (Section E.1.5).
10 Assumption on the composition of F037/8 wastes
generated in flow equalization tanks, clarifiers,
and low rate aeration tanks (Section E.l.l).
11 Assumption on average residence time in treatment
and neutralization tanks (Section E.1.5).
12 Assumption on the composition of F037/8 wastes
generated in treatment and neutralization tanks
(Section E.l.l)
13 Assumption on the composition of F037 sludges
generated from clean out of closure of impoundments
(Section E.l.l).
-------
Assumption for calculating accumulated F waste
generation from impoundments upstream of primary
trentnu-nt based on a sludge depth of two feet
(Sec11 on E.1,4).
Assumption based on sewer clean out calculations
(SectIon E.1,4).
Assumption on the composition of filter sludges
(Section E.1.1),
For facilities with surface impoundments that will
close due to tnanagecent of nevly identified wastes,
the TC questionnaire requested that the facilities
estimate the annualized quantity of tank sludges
from tanks that will replace surface lupoundnents.
EPA found that, on average, the annualized quantity
of tnnk sludge is one-third the quantity of wastes
that will be cleaned out from surface impoundments.
-------
E.3 Estimates of F037/8 Waste Generation for Category 2 Facilities
The following estimates of FQ37/8 waste generation have been made using
limited facility-specific information. These estimated volumes nay not be
equal to the volumes actually generated at the facilities.
The material-balance equations presented for each facility are generally
self-explanatory. Several general notes on the methodology have been provided
in Section E.2 (and other discussions are provided in Section E.l and in the
aain text). The relevant notes in Section E.l for a given equation are
indicated by superscripts in the equation.
The refineries in Category 2 are listed below.
• Louisiana Land and Exploration (Saraland, AL)
• Chevron (Kenai, AK)
• Mapco Alaska Petroleum (North Pole, AK)
• Tesoro Petroleum (North Pole, AK)
• Atlantic Richfield (Carson, CA)
• Chemoil Refining (Signal Hill, CA)
• Chevron (Richmond, CA)
• Conoco (Santa Maria, CA)
• Exxon (Benicia, CA)
• Fletcher Oil (Carson, CA)
• Golden West Refining (Santo Fe Springs, CA)
• Huntvay Refining (Benicia, CA)
• Huntvay Refining (Wilmington, CA)
• Kern Oil (Bakersfield, CA)
• Mobil (Torrance, CA)
• Pacific Refining (Hercules, CA)
• Paramount Petroleum (Paramount, CA)
• San Joaquin Refining (Bakersfield, CA)
• Shell Oil (Martinez, CA)
• Shell Oil (Wilmington, CA)
• Ten By (Oxnard, CA)
• Texaco (Bakersfield, CA)
• Texaco (Wilmington, CA)
• Tosco (Martinez, CA)
• Unocal (Los Angeles, CA)
• Unocal (San Francisco, CA)
• Witco Chemical (Oildale, CA)
• Colorado Refining (Commerce City, CO)
• Conoco (Denver, CO)
• Landmark Petroleum (Fruita, CO)
• Amoco (Savannah, CA)
• Young Refining (Douglasville, CA)
• Chevron (Barber's Point, HI)
• Hawaiian Independent (Ewa Beach, HI)
• Clark Oil (Blue Island, IL)
• Clark Oil (Hartford, IL)
• Mobil (Joliet, IL)
• Uno-Ven (Lemont, IL)
• Indiana Farm Bureau (Ht. Vernon, IS)
• Lake tor. Refining (Laketon, IN)
-------
Marathon (Indianapolis, IN)
Coastal Refining (El Dorado, KS)
Coastal Refining (Wichita, KS)
Faraland Industries (Coffeyville, KS)
Farmland Industries (Phillipsburg, KS)
National Cooperative Refinery Assn. (McPhearson, KS)
Texaco (El Dorado, KS)
Ashland (Catiettsburg, KY)
Sooerset Refinery (Somerset, KY)
Atlas Processing (Shreveport, LA)
Calcasieu Refining (Lake Charles, LA)
Calumet Lubricants (Princeton, IA)
Canal Refining (Church Point, LA)
Citgo (Lake Charles, LA)
Conoco (Lake Charles, LA)
Ker-HcCee Refining (Cotton Valley, LA)
Marathon (Caryville, LA)
Mobil (Chalnette, LA)
Placid Refining (Fort Allen, LA)
Shell Oil (Korea, LA)
Star Enterprise (Convent, LA)
Crystal Refining {Carson City, HI)
Marathon (Detroit, MI)
Ashland (St, Paul, M!i)
Koch Refining (Roseaoiu, MN)
Amerada Hess (Purvis, HS)
Ergon Refining (Vlcksburg, MS)
Southland Oil (Luoberton, MS)
Southland Oil (Sandersville, MS)
Cenex (Laurel, MT)
Conoco (Billings, MT)
Exxon (Billings, MT)
Montana Refining (Great Falls, MT)
Petro Source Refining (Tonopah, NV)
Aaerada Hess (Port Reading, NJ)
Chevron (Perth Aaboy, NJ)
Coastal Eagle Point Oil (Westville, NJ)
Exxoo (Linden, NJ)
Mobil (Paulsboro, NJ)
Seavlew Petroluem (Thorofare, NJ)
Bloomfield Refining (Bloomfield, NM)
Giant Industries (Gallup, KM)
Navajo Refining (Artesia, NM)
Thrlftway Marketing (Formlngton, NM)
Cibro Petroleua Products (Albany, NY)
Aaoco (Mandan, ND)
Ashland (Canton, OH)
Sun Refining (Toledo, OH)
Ker-McCee Refining (Vynneuood, OK)
Sinclair Oil (Tulsa, OK)
Sun Refining (Tulsa, OK)
Total (Ardaore, OK)
Chevron (Portland, OR)
Pennzoil Products (Rouseville, PN)
-------
• Sun Refining (Marcus Hook, PA)
• Sun Refining (Philadelphia, PA)
• Witco Chemical (Bradford, PA)
• Mapco Petroleua (Memphis, TO)
• Champlin Refining (Corpus Christ!, TX)
• Chevron (El Paso, TX)
• Coastal Refining (Corpus Christi, TX)
• Crown Central Petroleum (Houston, TX)
• Diamond Shamrock (Sunray, TX)
• Diamond Shamrock (Three Rivers, TX)
• Fina Oil & Chemical (Big Spring, TX)
• Fina Oil & Chemical (Port Arthur, TX)
• Hill Petroleua (Texas City, TX)
• Howell Hydrocarbons (San Antonio, TX)
• Koch Refining (Corpus Christi, TX)
• LaCloria Oil & Gas (Tyler, TX)
• Lyondell Petrochemical (Houston, TX)
• Marathon (Texas City, TX)
• Mobil (Beaumont, TX)
• Phillips 66 (Borger, TX)
• Phillips 66 (Sweeny, TX)
• Pride Refining (Abilene, TX)
• Star Enterprise (Port Arthur, TX)
• Triflnery (Corpus Christi, TX)
• Valero Refining (Corpus Christi, TX)
• Amoco (Sale Lake City, UT)
• Big Uest Oil (Salt Lake City, 'UT)
• Chevron (Salt Lake City, UT)
» Crysen Refining (Woods Cross, UT)
• Pennzoil (Roosevelt, UT)
• Phillips 66 (Woods Gross, UT)
• * Aaoco (Yorktown, VA)
• BP Oil (Ferndale, VA)
• Chevron (Seattle, WA)
• Sound Refining (Tacoma, WA)
• WS Oil & Refining (Tacoaa. WA)
• Murphy Oil (superior, WI)
• Aaoco (Casper, VY)
• Frontier Oil (Cheyenne, VY)
• Little America Refining (Casper, VY)
• Sinclair Oil (Sinclair, WY)
• Wyoming Refining (Newcastle, VY)
In order to not reveal confidential business information (CBI) on
specific refineries, the calculations and supporting information for those
refineries are in the RCRA CBI docket. To highlight that EPA does not intend
the F037/8 waste generation estimates presented here to represent volumes
actually generated by specific facilities, the names of the refineries have
been replaced by facility identification numbers in the material-balance
calculations.
-------
P037 AID F038 WASTK CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA tJSS AST) TRACKIKG SHEET
Facility #: 1
Data sources aval1able:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage. Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous vaste dntn base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments fross proposed rulr
x Organic Toxicity Characteristic Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estiifnt S en:
EPA used data fro- the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 vaste estigates:
F037 (routine) - 198 tons/yr
-------
F03? AK3 F03 8 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA OSE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility >f: 2
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survc-y)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDE)
No-rcigration petitions
Comments from the ;rcpoi>od rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Sas is for F037 and F038 vaste estim.icion:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinerv did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 vaste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 1.383 tons/yr
-------
Facility f 2
Crude capacity: 40,000 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 300,000 gallons/day2
K waste generation:
K049: 125 tons/year5
K051: 925 tons/year3
Assumptions:
Facility Croup 34
K049 composition: 40 percent w.-.ter. 48 percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
weight5
K051 composition: 65 percent water. 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
API separator solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
API separator oil re&oval efficiency: 75 percent6
Oil ir. the API skimming (to slop oil system): 50 percent7
Estication:
Solids in the API sludge (K051): (0.2 x 925 tons/yr) - 185 tons/yr
Solids in the API skimming (removed as K049): (0.12 x 125 tons/yr) - 15
tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 185 tons/yr + 15 tons/yr - 200
tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (200 tons/yr) / (0.S API solids
removal eff.) - 400 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 400 tons/yr - 200 tons/yr ~ 200
tons/yr
Quantity of API skimming: (0.52 KG49 water & solids content) x 125
tons/yr) / (1.0 - 0.5 oil in API skimming) - 130
tons/yr
Oil in API skimming: 130 tons/yr x 0.5 - 65 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0.15 x 925 tons/yr) - 138.75 tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator: 65 tons/yr + 138.75 tons/yr - 203.75
tons/yr
Oil in API Influent wastewater: (203.75 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal eff.)
- 2 71.7 tor.s/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 271.7 tons/yr - 203.75 tons/yr - 67.95 tons/yr
Since most F037 and F038 wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also lanci dispose F037 and F038 wastes. Because EPA has
not received notification from this refinery identifying land based units
(e.g., surface impoundments) accepting newly identified TC wastes, EPA assuaes
that the surface impoundments have been closed and the functions of the
surface iopound-uents have been replaced by tanks. EPA believes that tanks
replacing surface irspounci- ants would be cleaned out routinely to remove
accuraulated sludges (which are considered routinely generated F037 and F038
wastes). Based on information provided in the TC questionnaire, we estimated
the quantity of wastes generated from these routine tank cleanouts to be on an
-------
average one-third as much as the quantity of wastes generated frora the
cleanout of surface impoundments, Calculations for surface impoundment
cleanout (based on settling of solids in an impoundment that is cleaned out
every five years on the average) and for tank cleanouts (based on the
calculations for surface icpounciient cleanout) are presented below.
Quantity of sludge generated froc the surface impoundments that have been
closed:
Equalization basin volume: 2.4^4,000 cu.ft.?
Flow - 300,000 gallons/day - 40.110 cu,ft,./dav
Hydraulic retention time (HRT): 2,444,000 cu.ft. / 40,110 cu.ft./day - 1228
day - 294 72 hours
Settling calculations show that the HRT is sufficient for complete settling of
solids and removal of oil.
Solids and oil settling In basin: 200 tons/yr + 67,95 tons/yr - 267.95
tons/yr
Drag-out sludge frora basins and impoundments contain an average of 65 percent
water15; therefore, the F037 waste volume accumulating in the basin is
estimated at (267.95 tons/yr)/(l-.65)- 765.6 tons/yr.
Quantity of sludge generated from tanks:
3,825 tons of surface irapoundaent sludge x 1/317 - 1,275 ton/yr of tank
sludge.
Amount of F037 sludge frou annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinery: . (125 tons/yr K049 + 925 tons/yr
K051)/ 300,000 gallons/day - 0.0035
Sewer clean out amount: 0.0035 x 225 acres land area of refinery x
143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading of
1.0 calculated frons known refinery) - 113
tons/yr
-------
0U
ESTlONNAiRE A
General Facility Information
Page 30
»1 jo- -2
1 Ap-
y/J
rci^
ivVr (to-
• — - " f /
i"'"w
A~C*- i
<£~-;«t-"Cr ^ r ^ -~ji -
> Jcl-.< "lEL
\y
r-
>' < Ir-a-r
;>.>«- "*>' - I : o rj
K" il|»M & lll£06„ ,
•>, *u>»i K*sfi akl Isf. ^¦u0je.
- kO£i
iS~oao <5:
Ko¥f
/cuv?(
^ 2D
1 //«a."f &zl-a'?tr
*f 0
fiuJ kofo
sf> 000 G-
IC£>4
-------
P037 AND PO30 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USI AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility //: 3
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatrcent, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 vaste est iro/ition:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 vaste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 1;295 tor.s/yr
-------
F03? AND F038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS;
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility if: 4
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary .subccission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatcent, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/stato reporting requirements
California hazardous -'as te data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
N'o-raigration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 vaste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F033 vaste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 1,287 tons/yr
-------
Facility # 4
Crude capacity: 50,000 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 220,000 gallons/day2
K waste generation:
KQ49: 1.873 tons/year5
K051: 1,873 tons/year'
Assu-T.pt ions:
Facility Group 3'
K049 composition: 40 percent water, 48 percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
weight5
K0S1 composition: 65 percent v.-.ter, 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
API separator solids rercoval efficiency: 50 percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent4
Oil in the API skimming (to slop oil system): 50 percent'
Estimation:
Solids in the API sludge (K351): (0.2 x 1,873 tons/yr) - 374.6
tons/yr
Solids in the API skinning (reeoved at K049): (0.12 x 1,873 tons/yr) -
224.76 tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 374.6 tons/yr + 224.76 tons/yr -
5S9.36 tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (599.36 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids
removal eff.) - 1198.72 tons/yr
Solids- in API effluent wastewater: 1198.72 tons/yr - 599.36 tons/yr -
599.36 tons/yr
Quantity of API skimming: (0.52 K049 water & solids content) x 1,873
tons/yr) / (1.0 - 0.5 oil in API skimming) -
1947.92 tons/yr
Oil in API skinning: 1947.92 tons/yr x 0.5 - 973.96 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0.15 x 1,873 tons/yr) - 280.95 tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator: 973.96 tons/yr + 280.95 tons/yr -
1254.91 tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: (1254,91 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal
eff.) - 1673.2 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 1673.2 tons/yr - 1254.91 tons/yr - 418.29
tons/yr
Since most F037 and F038 wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
l'ar.d dispose TC wastes also land dispose F037 and F038 wastes. Because EPA has
not received notification fron this refinery identifying land-based units
(e.g.. surface icpound.ter.ts) accepting newly identified TC wastes, EPA assumes
that the surface impoundments have been closed ar.d the functions of the
surface impoundments have beer, replaced by tanks. EPA believes that tanks
replacing surface impoundments would be cleaned out routinely to remove
accumulated sludges (which are considered routinely generated F037 and F038
-------
wastes). Based on information provided in the TC questionnaire, we estimated
the quantity of wastes generated from these routine tank cleanouts to be on an
average one-third as much as wastes generated from cleanout of surface
impoundments. Calculations for surface impoundment cleanout (based on settling
of solids in an impoundment that was cleaned out every five years on the
average) and for tank cleanouts (based on the calculations for surface
impoundment cleanout) are presented below.
Equalization basin volume: 2,444,000 cu.ft.2
Flow - 220 (000 gallons/day - 29.414 cu.ft /-lay
Hydraulic retention time (HRT): 2.444,000 cu.ft. / 29,414 cu.ft./day - S3 day
- 1992 hours
Settling calculations show that the HRT is sufficient for complete settling of
solids and removal of oil.
Solids and oil settling in bssin: 599.36 tons/yr + 413.29 tons/yr -
1017,65 tons/yr
Drag-out sludge from basins and impoundments contain an average of 65 percent
water13; therefore, the F037 waste volume accumulating in the basin is
estimated at (1017.65 tons/yr)/(1 -.65)- 7907,6 tons/yr.
Quantity of sludge generated from tanks:
2,907 tons-of surface impoundment sludge x 1/317 - 969.2 ton/yr of tank
sludge.
Amount of F037 sludge from annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinery: (1,873 tons/yr K049 + 1,873 tons/yr
K051)/ 220,000 gallons/day -
0.017027
Sewer clean out amount: 0.017027 x 130 acres land area of refinery x
143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading of
1.0 calculated from known refinery) - 313
tons/yr
-------
Ml
Loowre
>
f03$
-------
»c GENERAL FACILITY - WIDE
> o HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SCHEMATIC
ri TO POIW
off-sire MANAGEMENT
hw tauw^wiim i2
NHW
w omnxi sum -snnm
ACCUMULATION
IN TANK
rorni«. ma
m ibm i mm
NHV-OPTION It
HW (CORROSIVE)
HW (CAUSTIC)
ACCUMULATION
STORAGE
DESTRUCTION OF
HA2ARDOUS WASTE
IN A CLOSED
LOOP SYSTEM
TREATMENT UNIT
(ELEMENTARY
NEUTRALIZATION)
-------
GENERAL FACILITY - WIDE
HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SCHEMATIC
G
® TO POTV
OFF-SJTE MANAGEMENT
KV taUKCHFtKM 12
NHV
anion auto-trim
ACCUMULATION
IN TANK
TOMSK ft. «3)
WMBIigllO
NHy-DPTIQN HI
HV (CORROSIVES
HV CCAUSTIC)
CONTAINER
ACCUHULATION
wasre water
bwimm twa
TANK NOJ-J, 5
DESTRUCTION OF
HAZARDOUS VASTE
IN A CLOSED
LOOP SVSTEH
TREATMENT UNIT
CELEHENTARY
NEUTRALIZATION)
Tank 14
-------
e
©
v)(
t-
Tank No. 2* A
(Proposed)
-/.fi Ifcj Z?£»ef*
SchcMttc Pligrta ol
0
fcSfl
KOS0
Ih'SCTOi
.yoluJ Is"5
-jn p fc- 3
1. (til PrOC»t« Wtttr «l Stptrtlor
2. (iti *PI Oil ««te»trf ni
J, M«U Pr»rjr HI
S, Slud«t Holding Itnk (till «*9 lift
ciiriiitr (o«t of Str.icti - currently used as
sludfic? holding tank
to Approtd
Mtpaitl Stl<^
Tank No. 1
l*J7r< I32«a
to'Ci 1
KOf
fcOS I
Wattr/Oll lo Wilt API
er to Oil Mcovtfy T#nk
W«ttr tin bt dr*Jntd fro* OH
R»co»ery funk to West API
*»FI1ttr fctd
Oil to Crude
Unit
AtrtUon
liooont
ank No
from Cftlt API
13?^?%
W*Ur
Viler
ruHU
to Aeration
Ugooni
Proc«ii
Uitcr
Procet* Miter
|fr,£ 2
Q0OI
Cso©&
C.Oo'/
7.r
io»r
frST
•a l f
Hr
_>6)S ;»r
1211
-------
*
T
0
. 0
t*
SchtuUc OU?rM of
Tank No. 3
(Proposed)
I 0
—ac-
re Aepro»«d
Btipsiit Sit**""
Tank No. 1
u.t.r/ou to Mill Mi
«r to Oil StcOMrj lut
Niter cm t>t dr«t<><4 from Oil
S«o»«ry link la Hilt A?I
ftttl
(5
ank No. 2H
Prsctii
H*ttr
To Atratlon
U$oont
fro* Cait API
To Aeration
Ujoons
-V
fast Process M»Uf AP! Stpoe*l*r
fill API Oil MCOtffry Ml
M«it Procet* Water API Separator
Mill W1 OH Recovery Pit
Slud9« Holding tank {tail and Wcit API
itw49* to be filtered) — cut of service
SUd»« Pi«p Suction PU
Oliver V#cuu» filter
Hittr Cakt l!n
Clarlficr (Owt of Str«Ut) - currently used as
sludge holding tank
Oil to Crude
Unit
on
\
Proceit Water
*
-------
F037 AND F03B WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS;
DATA 0SE AMD TRACKING SHEET
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Consents from the proposed rule
x Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F03? (routine) - 176 tons/yr
-------
FQ37 AKD P03 8 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility 6
Data sources available:
Petroleua refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
_x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Corrraents from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 vaste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and FQ38 vaste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 1,926 tons/yr
-------
P037 AND P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USK AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility if: 7
Data sources available:
Fetroleu-i refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Wnstc Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous vaste data base
•: Petroleum refinery data base (TRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 867 tons/yr
-------
Facility # 7
Crude capacity; 45.000 barrels/day'
Wastewater flow: 648,000 gallons/day2
K waste generation:
K049: 84 tons/year5
K051: 569 tons/year3
Assumptions:
Facility Group 2'
bv
by
veignc-
API separator solids removal efficiency: 50 percent4
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
Oil in the API skinning (to slop oil system): 50 percent7
K049 composition: 40 percent water, 48 percent oil, and 12 percent solids
weight5
K051 composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids
Estication:
Solids in the API sludge (K051): (0.2 x 569 tons/yr) - 113.8 tons/yr
Solids in the API skimming (removed as K049): (0.12 X 84 tons/yr) - 10.08
tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 113.8- tons/yr + 10.08 tons/yr -
123.88 tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (123.88 tor.s/yr) / (0.5 API solids
removal eff.} - 247.76 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 247.76 tons/yr - 123.88 tons/yr -
123.88 tons/yr
Quantity of API skimming: (0.52 K049 water & solids content) x 84 tons/yr)
/ (1.0 - 0,5 oil in API skimming) - 87.36
tons/yr
Oil in API skimming: 37.36 cons/yr x 0.5 - 43.68 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0,15 x 569 tons/yr) - 85.35 tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator: 43.68 tons/yr + 85.35 tons/yr -
129.03 tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: (129,03 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal eff.)
- 172 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater; 172 tons/yr - 129.03 tons/yr - 42.97 tons/yr
Since most F037 and F038 wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also land dispose F037 and F038 wastes. Because EPA has
not received notification from this refinery identifying land based units
(e.g., surface impoundments) accepting newly identified TC wastes. EPA assu.-r.es
that the surface impoundments have been closed ar.d the functions of the
surface impoundments have been replaced by tanks. EPA believes that tanks
replacing surface impoundments would be cleaned out routinely to remove
accumulated sludges (which are considered routinely generated F037 and F038
wastes). Based on information provided in the TC questionnaire, we estimated
the quantity of wastes generated from these routine tank cleanouts to be on an
-------
average one-third as much as the quantity of wastes generated from the
cleanout of surface impoundments, Calculations for surface iirpoundrer.t
cleanout (based on settling of solids in nn impoundment that is cleaned out
every five years on the average) and for tank cleanouts (based on the
calculations for surface impoundment cleanout) are presented below.
Quantity of sludge generated from the surfun impoundments that have been
closed:
Equalization basin volume: 6,285,000 cu.ft.2
Flow - 648.000 gallons/day - 86,638 cu.ft./day
Hydraulic retention time (HRT): 6,285,000 cu.ft. / 36,638 cu.fc./dav - 72.S
day - 1740 hours
Settling calculations show th.i* '.he HRT is sufficient for complete settling of
solids and removal of oil.
Solids and oil settling in basin: 123.88 tons/yr + 42.97 tens/yr -
166.85 tons/yr
Drag-out sludge from basins and impoundments contain an average of 65 percent
water"; therefore, the F03? waste volume accumulating in the basin is
estimated at (166.85 tons/yr)/(1 -.65)- 476.7 tons/yr.
Quantity of sludge generated from tanks:
2,385 tons of surface impoundment sludge x 1/3" - 795 ton/yr of tank sludge.
Amount of F037 sludge from annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sever clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinerv: (84 tons/vr K049 + 569 tons/yr
. K051)/ 648,000 gallons/day -
0.001008
Sewer clean out amount: 0.001008 x 500 acres land area of refinery x
143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading of
1.0 calculated frons known refinery) - 72.4
tons/yr
-------
P03? AKD P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AKD TRACKING SHEET
Facility 11: 8
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for FQ37 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from che above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 987 tons/vr
-------
F037 AKB P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA DSE AND TRACKIKG SHEET
Facility i): 9
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Was• o Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
X National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazard-- js waste data base
x Petroleun refinery data base (FRDB)
Ko-itigratior. petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data froo the above sDurces because the refinery did not
provide itore recent data,
F037 and F03S waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 4,308 tons/yr
-------
Facility # 9
Crude capacity: 105,000 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 2,200,000 gallons/day2
Facility Group l4
Estimation:
Amount of F03? sludge from annual refinery sever clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):'5
Solids loading of refinery: (768 tons/yr KQ51}/ 2,200,000
gallons/day - 0.000349
Sewer clean out amount: 0.000349 x 170 acres land area of refinery x
143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading of
1.0 calculated from known refinery) - 8.5
tons/yr
Since most F037 and F03S wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also land dispose F037 and F038 wastes. Because EPA has
not received notification froa this refinery identifying land based units
(e.g., surface impoundments) accepting newly identified TC wastes, EPA assumes
that the surface impoundments have been closed and the functions of the
surface impoundments have been replaced by tanks. EPA believes that tanks
replacing surface impoundments would be cleaned out routinely to remove
accumulated sludges (which are considered routinely generated F037 and F03S
wastes). Based on information provided in the TC questionnaire, we estimated
the quantity of wastes generated from these routine tank cleanouts to be on an
average one-third as much as the quantity of wastes generated from the
cleanout of surface impoundrter.es. Calculations for surface impoundment
cleanout (based on settling of solids in an impoundment that is cleaned out
every five years on the average) and for tank cleanouts (based on the
calculations for surface impoundment cleanout) are presented below.
Quantity of sludge generated froa the surface impoundments that have been
closed:
Amount of F'waste sludge fros upstream surface impoundment:
. 204,732 sq.ft area of the surface impoundment x 2 ft depth of the
sludge" x 63 lb/cu.ft density of the sludge - 25,796,232 lb - 12,898 tons
Quantity of sludge generated fros tanks:
12,898 tons of surface impoundment sludge x 1/3".- 4,299 ton/yr of tank
sludge.
-------
KEY-"
— WATER
— So MPS
£)O0 I -^> P At
*"I~e £X.v<-»
O XUL^JB.,0./
*s^
Water to PoTW
(nHw)
L_,
^FM
SEfitMrt*
Leaded Tk Btm3
(Hvv)
KoS^-
JH
To oPFSire
Pisposai.
Acoimumtkm
Im
CoMT*1N£RS
Stormwatcc
ftuWOPP
Cnhw)
V
^ •> Vi
r
A *"
Tlk
WAT£*__
Cnhw)
Sluooc TO ffXMo |
(Hia/)
Sidsmwatek
Apt Sep.SujDGe
(hw)
(COS I
9X. Ho, I
( Moat)
"/-fr)
Facility and Detail Schematic
-------
F037 AXD F038 WASTE CAPACITY AKALYSIS:
DATA DSB AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility It: 10
Data sources available:
Petroleua refinery visits/voluntary submission
X National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleun refinery data base (PRDB)
No-oigration petitions
X Comsients from the proposed rule
^ Organic Toxicity Survey •
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 1 tons/yr
F037 (surface impoundments)
F037 (surface impoundments)
F03 7 (surface impoundments)
- 30,100 tons
- 0 tons
- 0 tons
(7/92 - 12/92)
(1/93 - 12/93)
(1/94 - 6/94)
-------
F037 AND P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS;
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility if: 11
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
_x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
x Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
FQ37 and F03S waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 3 tons/yr
-------
FQ37 JUO r03« WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS i
DATA OS* AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility *): 12
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous U'aste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
X Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments fron the proposed rule
Organic toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation;
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimatea:
F037 (routine) - 4.2K tons/yr
-------
F037 AKD F038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA OSB AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility i): 13
Data sources available*.
Petroleum refinery vistcs/voluntary submission
_x iJational Survey of Hazardous Uaste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hatardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous vasts data base
x Petroleun refinery data base (PRD3)
Ko-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F033 vaste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide nore recent data,
FQ37 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 5,784 tons/yr
-------
Facility # 13
Crude capacity: 38,000 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 560,000 gallons/day2
K waste generation:
K049: 9 tons/year'
K051: 4,728 tons/vcar2
Assumptions:
Facility Group 34
K049 composition: 40 percent water, 48 percent oil. and 12 percent solids by
weight5
K051 composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
API separator solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent4
Oil in the API skinning (to slop oil system): 50 percent7
Estimation:
Solids in the API sludge (K051): (0.2 x 4,728 tons/yr) - 945.6
tons/yr
Solids in the API skinsming (removed as K049) : (0.12 x 9 tons/yr) - 1.08
tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 945.6 tons/yr + 1.08 tons/yr -
.946.68 tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (946.6S tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids
removal e,ff.) - 1893.36 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 1893.36 tons/yr - 946.68 tons/yr -
946.68 tons/yr
Quantity of API skimming: (0.52 K049 water & solids content) x 9 tons/yr)
/ (1.0 - 0.5 oil in API skimming) - 9.36 tons/yr
Oil in API skimming: 9.36 tons/yr x 0.5 - 4.68 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0.15 x 4,728 tons/yr) - 709.2 tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator: 4,68 tons/yr + 709.2 tons/yr -
713.88 tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: (713.88 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal eff.)
- 951.8 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 951.8 tons/yr - 713.88 tons/yr - 237,92
tons/yr
Since most F037 and F038 wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also land dispose F037 and F038 wastes. Because EPA has
not received notification froa this refinery identifying land based units
(e.g., surface impoundments) accepting newly identified TC wastes, EPA assumes
that the surface impoundments have been closed and the functions of the
surface impoundments have been replaced by tanks. EPA believes that tanks
replacing surface impoundments would be cleaned out routinely to remove
accumulated sludges (which are considered routinely generated F037 and F038
wastes). Based on information provided in the TC questionnaire, we estimated
-------
the quantity of wastes generated from these routine tank cleanouts to be on an
average one-third as much as the quantity of wastes generated from the
cleanout of surface impoundments. Calculations for surface impoundment
cleanout (based on settling of solids in an impoundment that is cleaned out
every five years on the average) and for tank cleanouts (based on the
calculations for surface impoundment cleanout) are presented below.
Quantity of sludge generated from the surface impoundments that have been
closed:
Equalization basin voluoe: 4 , 826,000 cu.ft,2
Flow - 560,000 gallons/day - 74.872 cu.ft./dav
Hydraulic retention tine (HRT): 4,8?.(>,000 cu.ft, / 74,872 cu.ft./day - 64 day
- 1536 hours
Settling calculations show that the MKT is sufficient for complete settling of
solids and removal of oil.
Solids and oil settling in basin: 946.68 tons/yr + 237.92 tons/yr -
1184.6 tons/yr
Drag-out sludge from basins and impoundments contain an average of 65 percent
water13; therefore, the F037 waste volume accumulating in the basin is
estimated at (1184.6 tons/yr)/(1 -.65)- 3384.6 tons/yr.
Quantity of sludge generated from tanks:
16,923 tons of surface impoundment sludge x 1/317 - 5,641 ton/yr of tank
sludge.
Anount of F037 sludge from annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinery: (9 tons/yr K049 + 4,728 tons/yr
K051)/ 560,000 gallons/day -
0.008459
Sewer clean out amount: 0.008459 x 117 acres land area of refinery x
143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading of
1.0 calculated from known refinery) - 142
tons/yr
-------
P037 AKD P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA BSE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility #: 14
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntnry submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (t'KI)B)
No-nigration petitions
«
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basts for F037 and F038 vaste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 357 tor,s/yr
-------
P037 AND F038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA OSE AND TRACKING SHEET
Fac i 1 i ty #: 15
Data sources available:
Petroleua refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleua refinery data base (PRDB)
No-raigration petitions
Comments froa the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F03S waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 560 tons/yr
-------
Facility f' 15
Crude capacity: 5,0,000 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 420,000 gallons/dny2
K waste gfj^ration:
K051: 459 tons/vf-.-.r3
Assumpt i ons :
Facility Group 24
K051 composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
we ight5
API separator solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
Estimation:
Solids in the API sludge (K051): (0.2 x 459 tons/yr) - 91.8 tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (91.8 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids
reiroval eff.) - 183.6 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 183.6 tons/yr - 91.8 tons/yr - 91.8
tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0.15 x 459 tons/yr) - 68.85 tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: (68.85 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal eff.)
- 91.8 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 91.8 tons/yr • 68.85 tons/yr - 22.95 tons/yr
Since most F037 and F038 wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also land dispose F037. and F038 wastes. Because EPA has
not received notification from this refinery identifying land based units
(e.g., surface impoundments) accepting newly identified TC wastes, EPA assumes
that the surface impoundaents have been closed and the functions of the
surface impoundments have been replaced by tanks. EPA believes that tanks
replacing surface impoundments would be cleaned out routinely to remove
accumulated sludges (which are considered routinely generated F037 and F038
wastes). Based on information provided in the TC questionnaire, we estimated
the quantity of wastes generated from these routine tank cleanouts to be on an
average one-third as much as the quantity of wastes generated from the
cleanout of surface impoundaents. Calculations for surface impoundment
cleanout (based on settling of solids in an impoundment that is cleaned out
everv five years on the average) and for tank cleanouts (based on the
calculations for surface 'impoundment cleanout) are presented below.
Quantity of sludge generated from the surface impoundments that have been
closed:
Equalization basin volume: 5,412,000 cu.ft.2
Flow - 420,000 gallons/day - 56,154 cu.ft./dav
Hydraulic retention time (KRT): 5,412,000 cu.ft. / 56.154 cu.ft./day - 96 day
- 2 304 hours ,
-------
Settling calculations show that the HRT is sufficient for complete settling of
solids and removal of oil.
Solids and oil settling in basin: 91.8 tons/yr + 22,95 tons/yr -
114,75 tons/yr
Drag-out sludge from basir.s and impoundments contain an average of 65 percent
water'3; therefore, the F". 37 waste volurrn- acnurulating in the basin is
estimated at (lli.75 tons/yr)/C1 -.65)- 327 ' tons/yr.
Quantity of sludge generated from tank*:
1,640 tons of surface ircpoundrtent slud^< x 1/317 - 547 ton/yr of tank sludge.
Amount of F037 sludge from annual refinery sever clean out {extrapolation
based on refineries with known sever c1 ran out quantities):15
Solids loading of refir.erv: (459 tons/yr K051 >/ 420,000
gallons/day - 0.001093
Sewer clean out araount: 0.001093 x 83 acres land area of refinery x
143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading of
1.0 calculated frcr* known refinery) - 13
tons/yr
-------
F037 AND PO30 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility : 16
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/stair reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleua refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposi-d rule
x Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F03fi vaste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estloates:
F037 (routine) - 11 tons/yr
-------
Facility # 16
Crude capacity: 18,107 barrols/tlay1
Uastewater flow: 100,000 gallons/day'
K waste generation:
K051: 100 tons/year2
Assurept ions:
Facility Group 3'
KQ49 composition: 10 percent water
weight5
K051 composition: 65 percent vatfr
weight5
API separator solids removal efficiency: 50 percent'
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent4
Oil in the API skimming (to slop oil system): 50 percent7
Slop oil emulsion solids (K049) was not reported in TSDR survey or PRDB;
therefore, an estimated K049 quantity of 28 tons/vr was based on 1.38 metric
tons/yr (or 1.52 tons/yr) per 1,000 barrels/day*
Estimation:
Amount of F037 sludge from annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinery: (28 tons/yr K049 + 100 tons/yr
K051)/ 100,000 gallons/day -
0.00128
Sever clean out amount: 0,00128 x 60 acres land area of refinery x
143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading of
1.0 calculated from known refinery) - 11
tons/yr
This refinery has surface impoundments that will close with F037/8
wastes in place. Therefore, the surface impoundment waste will not require
alternative treatment.
48 percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
-------
-il- o
->¦
*LO?
Oil
-------
FOB? AHD P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA DSB AKD TRACKING SHEET
Facility 1?
Data sources available:
Petroleua refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous vaste data base
_x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments fron the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 vaste estimation:
EPA used data fron the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
FQ37 and F038 vaste estlcates:
F037 (routine) - 485 tons/yr
-------
Facility # 17
Crude capacity: 69,220 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 1,330,000 gallons/day2
K waste generation:
K051: 276 tons/yc-ar?
Assumptions:
Facility Group 34
K049 composition: 40 percent water, 48 percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
weight5
K0S1 composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
API separator solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
Oil in the API skinning (to slop oil system): 50 percent7
Slop oil emulsion solids (K049) was not reported in TSDR survey or PRDB;
therefore, an estimated K049 quantity of 105 tons/yr was based on 1,38 metric
tons/yr (or 1.52 tons/yr) per 1,000 barrels/day8
Estimation:
Solids tn the API sludge (K051): (0.2 X 276 tons/yr) - 55.2 tons/yr
Solids in the API skimatng (removed as K049): (0.12 x 105 tons/yr) - 12.6
tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 55.2 -tons/yr + 12.6 tons/yr - 67.8
tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (67.8 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids
removal eff.) - 135.6 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 135.6 tons/yr • 67.8 tons/yr - 67.8
tons/yr
Quantity of API skisaing: (0.52 K049 water & solids content) x 105
tons/yr) / (1.0 - 0.5 oil in API skimming) -
109.2 tons/yr
Oil in API skimming: '109.2 tons/yr x 0.5 - 54.6 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0.15 x 276 tons/yr) - 41.4 tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator: 54.6 tons/yr + 41.4 tons/yr - 96
tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: (96 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal eff.) -
128 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 128 tons/yr - 96 tons/yr - 32 tons/yr
Since most F037 and F038 wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also land dispose F037 and F038 wastes. Because EPA has
not received notification from this refinery identifying land based units
(e.g., surface impoundments) accepting newly identified TC wastes, EPA assumes
that the surface impoundments have been closed and the functions of the
surface impoundments have been replaced by tanks. EPA believes that tanks
-------
replacing surface iscpoundirncs would be cleaned out routinely to remove
accumulated sludges (which are considered routinely generated F037 and F038
wastes). Based on information provided in the TC questionnaire, we estimated
the quantity of wastes generated from these routine tank cleanouts to be on an
average one-third as such as the quantity of wastes generated from the
cleanout of surface impoundments. Calculations for surface impoundment
cleanout (based on settling of solids in an impoundment that is cleaned out
every five years on the average) ar.d for tank cleanouts (based on the
calculations for surface impoundment cleanout) are presented below.
Quantity of sludge generated from the surface impoundments that have been
closed:
Equalization basin volume: 7,954,000 cu.ft.2
Flow - 1,330,000 gallons/day - 177,321 cu.ft./dav
Hydraulic retention time (HRT): 7,95-i.OOO cu.ft. / 177,821 cu.ft./dsy - 4i. 7
day - 1072 hours
Settling calculations show that the HRT is .-.ufficient for complete settling of
solids and removal of oil.
Solids and oil settling in basin: 67.8 tons/yr 4- 32 tons/yr - 99.8
t onr/yr
Drag-out sludge from basins and impoundments contain an average of 65 percent
water'3; therefore, the F037 waste volume accumulating in the basin is
estimated at (99,8 tons/vr}/(1•.65)- 285.1 tons/yr.
Quantity of sludge generated from tanks:
1.42S cons of surface Impoundment sludge x 1/317 - 475 ton/yr of tank sludge-
Amount of FQ37 sludge from annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):"
Solids loading of refinery: (105 tons/yr K049 + 276 tons/yr
K051)/ 1,330,000 gallons/day -
0.000286
Sewer clean out amount: 0.C00286 x 231 acres land area of refinery x
143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading of
1.0 calculated from known refinery) - 9.5
tor.s/yr
-------
netng filmed.
il
^nu^5
aiv^ok?i
d?J <
\30>
t
w
'Sttxm
CL
-------
P037 AND P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA tJSE AHD TRACKING SHEET
Facility #: 18
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous vaste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 9 tons/yr
-------
Facility # 18
Crude capacity: 8,200 barrels/day'
Wastewater flow: 5,000 gallons/day2
K waste gfener.ition:
K051: 1 tons/year2
Assumptions:
Facility Group 34
K049 composition: 40 percent va:. r, 48 percent oil. and 12 percent solids by
weight5
K051 composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
API separator solids rercoval efficiency: 50 percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
Oil In the API skimrcing (to slop oil system): 50 percent7
Slop oil emulsion solids (K049) vas not reported in TSDR survey or PRDB;
therefore, an estimated K049 quantity of 9 tons/yr was based on 1.38 metric
tons/yr (or 1.52 tons/yr) per 1,000 barrels/day®
Estimation:
Solids in the API sludge (K051): (0.2 x 1 tons/yr) - 0.2 tons/vr
Solids in the API skimming (removed as K049): (0.12 x 9 tons/yr) - 1.08
tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 0.2 tons/yr + 1.08 tons/yr - 1.28
tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (1.28 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids
removal eff.) - 2.56 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 2.56 tons/yr - l."28 tons/yr - 1.28
tons/yr
Quantity of API skinning: (0.52 K049 water & solids content) x 9 tons/yr)
/ (1.0 • 0.5 oil in API skimming) - 9.36 tons/yr
Oil in API skimming: 9.36 tons/yr x 0.5 - 4.68 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0.15 x 1 tons/yr) - 0.15 tons/yr
Oil retsoved in the API separator: 4.68 tons/yr + 0.15 tons/yr - 4.S3
tons/yr
Oil In API influent wastewater: 4.8J tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal et'f. 5 -
6.4 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 6.4 tons/yr - 4.S3 tons/yr - 1.57 tons/yr
Since most F037 and F038 wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also land dispose F037 and F038 wastes. Because EPA has
not received notification froc this refinery identifying land based units
(e.g., surface impoundments) accepting newly identified TC wastes, EPA assumes
that che surface impoundments have brt-n closed and the functions of the
surface impoundments have beer, replaced by tanks, EPA believes that tanks
replacing surface impoundment!, would be cleaned out routinely to remove
-------
accumulated sludges (which are considered routinely generated F03? and F038
wastes), Based on information rrcviced in the TC questionnaire, we estimated
the quantity of wastes generated fron these routine tank cleanouts to be on an
average one-third as tsuch as the quantity of wastes generated from the
clear.out of surface impoundments. Calculations for surface impoundment
cleanout (based on settling of solids in an impoundment that is cleaned out
every five years on the average) and for tank cleanouts (based on the
calculations for surface iitpo -r.dsent cleanout1 are presented below.
Quantity of sludge generated fror the surface impoundments that have been
closed:
Equalization basin vol time : 1.551.000 cu.ft.2
Flow - 5,000 gallons/day - 669 cu.ft,/day
Hydraulic retention tine (HST): 1.551,000 cu.ft. / 669 cu.ft./day ~ 2320.1 day
- 556B2.4 hours
Settling calculations show that the HST is sufficient for complete settling of
solids and removal of oil.
Solids and oil settling in basini l..*S tons/yr + 1.57 tons/vr - 2,85
tor.s/yr
Drag-out sludge from basins and inpour.daer.ts contain an average of 65 percent
water15; therefore, the F037 waste volune accumulating in the basin is
estimated at (2.85 tons/yr)/(l-.65)- 8.1 tons/yr.
Quantity of sludge generated from tanks:
8 tons of surface impoundment sludge x 1/3" - 3 ton/yr of tank sludge.
Amount of F03? sludge froa annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sever clean out quantities):'5
Solids loading of refinery: (9 tons/vr K049 + 1 tons/yr K051)/
5,000 gallons/day - 0.002
Sewer clean out amount; 0.002 x 20 acres land area of refinery x
1-3.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading of
1.0 calculated from known refinery) - 5.75
tor.s/yr
-------
ibcess
-------
P037 AMD F038 KASTB CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA OSS AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility if: 19
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous vaste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-nigration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basts for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 1,436 tons/vr
-------
P037 AND P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility ii: 20
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 vaste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 vaste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 2,951 tons/yr
-------
Pacilifcy # 20
Crude capacity: 16.000 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 364,000 gallons/day2
K waste generation:
K049: 24 cons/yi-.ii
K051: 112 ton.H/vi-.ii'
Assumptions:
Facility Group 64
oil, ami 12 percent solids by
oil. and 20 percent solids by
50 percent6
75 percent6
M) percent7
Estimation:
K049 composition: 40 percent water. 48 |'i-is cut
weight5
K051 composition: 65 percent water, 13 pen en?
weight5
API separator solids reaoval efficiency'
API separator oil removal efficiency:
Oil in the API skimming (to slop oil svf.triiti'
Solids in the API sludge (K051): (0 2 x 112 tons/yr) - 22.4 tons/vr
Solids in the API skimming (removed as K0V») : (0.12 x 24 tons/vr) - 2.88
lons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: V 2.4 t ons/yr f 2.88 tons/vr - 25.28
t ons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (25.28 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids
removal eff.) - 50.56 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: '>0.56 tons/yr • 25.28 tons/yr -
25.28 tons/yr
Quantity of API skimming: (0.52 K04'> water h solids content) x 24 tons/yr)
/ (1.0 * O.'i oil in API skimming) - 24.96
tons/vr
Oil in API skimming: 24.^6 ton?;/vv x 0.5 - 12.48 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K05t): (0.15 x 112 tons/yr) - 16.8 tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator: 12.48 tons/yr + 16.8 tons/yr - 29.28
ions/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater; 2Q,28 ton-./vr) / (0.75 API oil removal eff.) -
tons/vr
Oil in API effluent wastewater 3C) tons/yr • 2^.26 tons/yr - 9.72 tons/yr
Since most F037 and F038 waste* exhibit tin* TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also land dispose 101? and F038 wastes. Because EPA has
not received notification from this refinery identifying land based units
(e.g., surface impoundment s) accepting m-wly identified TC wastes, EPA assumes
that the surface impoundments have been closed and the functions of the
surface impoundments have been replaced t«v tanks. EPA believe's that tanks
replacing surface impoundments would hi- eleaned out routinely to remove
accumulated sludges (which are tons 1 dered i out inely generated F03? and F03S
wastes). Based on information provided in the TC questionnaire, we estimated
the quantity of'WASte.s generattd irom t!ie?.e routine tank cleanouts to be on sn
-------
average one-third as ouch as the quantity of wastes generated frore the
cleanout of surface impoundments. Calculations for surface impoundment
cleanout (based on settling of solids in an impoundment that is cleaned out
every five years on the average) and for tank clear.outs (based on the
calculations for surface inpound-Dent cleanout) are presented be low.
Quantity of sludge generated from the surface impoundments that have been
closed:
Equalization basin voiuae: 53,022,000 cu.ft.2
Flow - 864,000 gallons/day - 115,517 ru,f t,/day
Hydraulic retention time (HRT): 58,022,000 cu.ft. / 115,517 cu.ft./day - 502.3
day - 12055.2 hours
Settling calculations show that the HRT is sufficient for complete settling of
solids and removal of oil.
Solids and oil settling in basin*. 25.28 tons/yr + 9.72 tons/vr - 35
totis/yr
Drag-out sludge from basins and impoundments contain an average of 65 percent
water1'; therefore, the F037 vaste volume accumulating in the basin is
estiaited at (35 tons/yr)/(1-,65)- 100 tons/yr.
Amoun*. of F vaste sludge fros upstream surface impoundment:
131,987 sq.ft area of the surface Impoundment x 2 ft depth of the
sludge" x 63 Ib/cu.ft density of the sludge - 16,630,362 lb - 8,351 tons
Quantity of sludge generated from tanks:
8,851 tons of surface impoundaent sludge x 1/317 -'2,950 ton/yr of tank
sludge.
Amount of F037 sludge fron annual refinery seuer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with knowr. sewer clean out quantities):'5
Solids loading of refinery; (24 tons/yr K049 + 112 tons/yr
K051)/ 864,000 gallons/day -
0,000157
Sewer clean out aaount: 0.000157 x 53 acres land area of refinery x
143,7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading of
1.0 calculated from known refinery) - 1.20
tons/yr
-------
;?roc«$
3W
ATI
~4 tori
5tTTUM^_
dKr&TOH
TWs
'Ka^R;
£>c
# -7^0
F67*
biicH^eotf
¦* k»3i :
r- >"
FeP
-------
P037 AMD F038 WASTE CAPACITY AKALYSIS;
DATA OSE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility Q: 21
Data sources available:
Petroleun refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
_x_ Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 vaste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 vaste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 3,297 tons/yr
-------
Facility * 21
Crude capacity: 286,000 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow; 7,000,000 gallons/day2
K waste generation:
K051: 496 tons/year2
Assmtpiions:
Facility Group ?4
K049 composition: 40 percent water. 48 percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
weight5
K051 composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
API separator solids removal efficic-ncy: 50 percent'
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
Oil in the API skimming (to slop oil system): 50 percent7
Slop oil emulsion solids (K049) was not reported in TSDR survey or PRDB;
therefore, an estimated K049 quantity of 47? tons/yr was based on 1,38 metric
tons/yr (or 1,52 tons/yr) per 1,000 barrels/day8
Estimation:
Solids in the API sludge (K05I): (0.2 x 496 tons/yr) - 99.2 tons/yr
Solids in the API skimming (reioved as K049): (0.12 x 477 tons/yr) - 57.24
tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 99.2 tons/yr + 57.24 tons/yr -
156,44 tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (156,44 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids
removal eff.) - 312.88 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 312,88 tons/yr - 156.44 tons/yr -
156.44 tons/yr
Quantity of API skimming: (0.52 K049 water & solids content) x 477
tons/yr) / (1.0 - 0.5 oil in API skinning) -
496.08 tons/yr
Oil in API skimming: 496.08 tons/yr x 0.5 - 248.04 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0.15 x 496 tons/yr) - 74.4 tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator: 248.04 tons/yr + 74.4 tons/yr -
322.44 tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: 322.44 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal eff.)
- 429.9 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 429.9 tons/yr - 322.44 tons/yr - 107.46
tons/yr
This refinery has completed segregation of its stormwater sewers frora its
process sewers. It is therefore expected that the solids loading of the
influent wastewater would be 15X of the solids loading for a combined sewer
system.
-------
Equalization basin volurae: 1,743.000 cu.ft.2
flow - 7,000,000 gallons/day - 925.900 cu.fc./day
Hydraulic retention time (Hr.T) : L.748,000 cu.ft, / 935,900 cu. ft./day - 1.9
day - 45,6 hours
Settling calculations show that the HRT is sufficient for corrplete settling of
solids and removal of oil.
Solids and oil settling in basir.: 23.46 tons/yr + 16.11 tons/yr -
39.57 tons/yr
Drag-out sludge from basins and impoundments contain an average of 65 percent
water1*; therefore, the F037 waste volurce accumulating in the basin is
estiaated at (39.57 tons/yr)/(l-.65)- 113 tons/yr.
Aoount of F037 sludge fros ar.-ual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with kncvr. sever clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinery: (477 tons/yr K049 + 496 tons/yr
K051)/ 7,000,000 gallons/dav -
0,000139
Sewer clean out amount: 0.000139 x 1047 acres land area of refinery x
14.3,7 x 0.15 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids
loading of 1.0 calculated from known refinery)
- 3.13 tons/yr
Amount of F waste sludge froa upstream surface impoundment:
1,033,679 sq.ft area of the surface impoundment * 0.3 ft depth of the
sludge14 * 63 lb/cu.ft density of the sludge - 1,953,653 lb - 9,768 tons
Quantity of sludge generated froa tanks:
9,881 tons of surface impoundment sludge x 1/317 - 3,294 ton/yr of tank
sludge.
-------
GENERAL FACILITY -
WIDE
SCHEMATIC
4
CI 418 I LAND TfttAIUtNt UNItt
UKIT K«. t-J
-------
GENERAL FACILITY - WIL
Clean wash watch
Jc0'. '
fSw^-o.3 a^ov»v»JLj •-Occs^^?
Vm^u0r - -f m - n^ie-.
tk fywluucJ"
p^ucl £>COlj^^
u^ ^
a_ C£t\a\C^ o\\
KeC--'
API
SEPARATOR
*CC0vefi£3 Oil
nh* process *
CCUALIZATIGN.
ANO * O T ¦*
API SEPARATOR
3LUCQC XCSt
AHD
•UH3LK CLEANING
SOLIDS R56G
COM^OhEMf3
N'
CLASS I LAND TSEAT»
UNIT NO. •
-------
E SCHEMATIC
UAKCU*
WA?£A
HOT W*?£Q TO
cool w*t£« to Rcrmcst
PROCESS UNITS
COOUWG T0»*£A
SIUDCSE OQO?
OfF-SlT£
0«4I»OS*L
TANK
tfAOCO TANK
BOTTOM K0S1
finishes ikaqco aAiauwe
TO MANKCT
4Q00 JQ. rOOT
WCATHtniMQ TAK<
5?
WCATMtftEO
ttAOCO TANK
•OTTOUS XQ32
}0 -tt,uU. WWftSD
my m U^4v^tWd~
om-siti
eis»»esA*,
*P0l
)CP65 C<
S'"fe
fMENT UNITS
-f c/OWyC-
pu/ & £<,
¦prtU^C) ^Ui'sD . y
-------
DETAILED SCHEMATIC K05
CLEAN WASH WATER
HEAT EXCHANGER BUNDLE
REFINEY
OILY WATER
SYSTEM
API
SEPERATOR
-------
DETAILED SCHEMATIC K05 ¦
REFtNERY
SEPARATOR
WATER
OILY
WATER
RECOVERED OIL TANKAGE
NHW PROCESS WATER TO
EQUALIZATION. BIOX AERATION
ANO P O T W
API SEPERATOR SLUDGE K051
ANO BUNDLE CLEANING SOLIOS K050
VACUUM
TRUCK
O
0
CLASS r
LANO TREATMENT UNIT
-------
DETAILED SCHEMATIC K052
GASOLINE
COMPONENTS
TEL
TANK
LEADED TANK
BOTTOM K052
VACUUM
TRUCK
(J leak (J O
PROOF
CONTAINER
FINISHED LEADED GASOLINE
TO MARKET
4000 SQ, FOOT
WEATHERING TANK
OFF-SITE ¦
DISPOSAL
VACUUM
TRUCK
O OleakO
PROOF
CONTAINER
-------
DETAILED SCHEMATIC D007
WARM/HOT WATER TO '
COOLfNG TOWER
MAKEUP
WATER
COOL WATER TO REFINERY
PROCESS UNITS
COOLING TOWER
SLUDGE COOT
OFF-SITE
DISPOSAL
-------
P037 AND F038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
-*
Facility it: 22
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous '-'ante Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (FRDB)
No-raigration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and FQ38 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 61 tons/yr
-------
P037 AKS P03 8 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA OSZ AND TRACKING SHEKT
Facility //: 23
Data sources available;
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposa
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
r. Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments froo the. proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data,
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 7 tons/yr
-------
F037 AKD P03 3 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA US2 AKD TRACKING SHEET
Data sources available:
Petroleuns refinery visits, voluntary submission
y National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment. Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous -xste data base
x Petroleum refinery data, base (PRDB)
No-roigration petitions
___ Comments from the proposed rule
Orgrnic Toxicity Survey
Basis for FQ37 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the abeva sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates;
F037 (routine) - 1? tor.s/yr
-------
Facility '=
24
Crude capacity: 8,500 barrels/day'
Wastewater flow; 90,000 gallons/day2
K waste generation:
K051: 44 tons/year'
Assumptions:
Facility Group 3'
K049 composition: 40 percent water, 48 percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
weight'
K051 composition: 65 percent water. 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
API separator solids removal efficiency: 50 percent4
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent4
Oil in the API skinning (to slop oil system): 50 percent7
Slop oil emulsion solids (K049) was not reported in TSDR survey or PRDB;
therefore, an estimated K049 quantity of 13 tons/yr was based on 1,38 metric
tons/yr (or 1.52 tons/yr) per 1,000 barrels/day8
This facility has a IAF unit but has been reporting IAF sludge as K048, which
is DAF sludge For the purpose of this capacity analysis, the IAF sludge is
considered an F037 waste.
Estimation:
Solids in the API sludge (K051): (0.2 x 44 tons/yr) - 8.8 tons/yr
Solids in the API skimming (removed as K049): (0.12 x 13 tons/yr) - 1.56
tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 8.8 tons/yr +1.56 tons/yr - 10.36
tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (10.36 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids
removal eff.) - 20.72 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 20.72 tons/yr ¦ 10.36 tons/yr -
10.36 tons/yr
Quantity of API skimming: (0.52 K049 water & solids content) x 13 tons/yr)
/ (1.0 - 0.5 oil in API skimming) - 13.52
tons/yr
Oil in API skimming: 13.52 tons/yr x 0,5 - 6.76 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0.15 x 44 tons/yr) - 6.6 tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator: 6.76 tons/yr + 6.6 tons/yr - 13.36
tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: 13.36 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal eff.) -
17.8 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 17.8 tens/yr • 13.36 tons/yr - 4.44 tons/yr
Since most F037 and F038 wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also land dispose F037 and F038 wastes. Because EPA has
not received notification froa this refinery identifying land based units
-------
(e.g., surface impoundments) accepting newly identified TC wastes, EPA assises
that the surface impoundments have hci-n closed and the functions of the
surface impoundments have been replaced by tanks. EPA believes that tanks
replacing surface impoundments vould be cleaned out routinely to remove
accumulated sludges (which are considered routinely generated F03? and F033
wastes). Based on information provided in the TC questionnaire, we estimated
the quantity of wastes generated from these routine tank cleanouts to be on an
average one-third as much as the quantity of wastes generated from the
clear.out of surface impoundments. Calculations for surface impoundment
cleanout.(based on settling of solids in an impoundment that is cleaned out
every five years on the average) and for t.:;k cleanouts (based on the
calculations for surface impoundment clemmut) are presented below.
Quantity of sludge generated frcz the surface impoundments that have been
closed;
Equalization basin volume; 1.£81.702 cu.ft.2
Flow - 90,000 gallons/day - 12,033 cuft./day
Hydraulic retention time 1,5*1,792 cu.ft. / 12,033 cu. ft. /day - 156.4
day - 3753.6 hours
Settling calculations show that the KRT is sufficient for complete settling of
solids and removal of oil.
Solids and oil settling in basir.: 10.36 tons/yr + 4.44 tons/yr - 14.8
tons/yr
Drag-out sludge from basins and impoundments contain an average of 65 percent
water13; therefore, the F037 waste volume accumulating in the basin is
esticated at (14,8 tons/yr)/(1•.£3)- 42.3 tons/yr.
Quantity of sludge generated froa tanks;
42 tons of surface impoundment sludge x 1/317 - 14 ton/yr of tank sludge.
Amount of F037 sludge froa annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities);15
Solids loading of refinery; (13 tons/yr K049 + 44 tons/yr K051)/
90,000 gallons/day - 0.000633
Sewer clean out amount; 0.000633 x 28 acres land area of refinery x
143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading of
1.0 calculated from known refinery) - 2.53
tcr.s/vr
-------
An
F£P
b>fscltw
F0S1
-------
F037 AKD P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility #: 25
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
x Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data,
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
FQ37 (routine) - 166 tons/yr
-------
Facility # 25
Crude capacity: 240,000 barrels/day'
Wastewater flow: 2,300,000 gallons/day2
K waste generation:
K051: 158 tons/year2
'Assumptions: -
Facility Group 7*
K049 composition: 40 percent water, 48 percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
weight5
K051 composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent oil. and 20 percent solids by
weight5
API separator solids removal efficiency: 50 percent4,
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
Oil in the API skimming Cto slop oil system): 50 percent7
Slop oil emulsion solids (K049) was not reported In TSDR survey or PRDB;
therefore, an estimated K049 quantity of 365 tons/yr was based on 1.38 metric
tons/yr (or 1.52 tons/yr) per 1,000 barrels/day8
Estimation:
Solids in the API sludge (K051): (0.2 x 158 tons/yr) - 31.6 tons/yr
Solids in the API skinning (removed as K049): (0,12 x 365 tons/yr) - 43,8
tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 31,6 tons/yr + 43.8 tons/yr - 75.4
tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (75.4 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids
removal eff.) - 150.8 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 150.8 tons/yr - 75.4 tons/yr - 75.4
tons/yr
Quantity of API skimming: (0.52 K049 water & solids content) x 365
tons/yr) / (1.0 - 0.5 oil in API skimming) -
379.6 tons/yr
Oil in API skimming: 379.6 tons/yr x 0.5 - 189,8 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051!: (0.15 x 158 tons/yr) - 23.7 tons/yr
„il removed in the API separator: 189.8 tons/yr + 23.7 tons/yr - 213.5
tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: 213.5 tons/yr) / (0,75 API oil removal eff.) -
284,7 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater; 284,7 tons/yr - 213.5 tons/yr - 71.2 tons/yr
Since most F037 and F038 wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, Refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also land dispose F037 and F038 wastes. Because EPA has '
not received notification fro- this refinery identifying land based units
(e.g., surface impoundments) accepting newly identified TC wastes, EPA assumes
that the surface impoundments have been closed and the functions of the
-------
surface impoundments have been replaced by tanks. EPA believes that tanks
replacing surface impoundments would be cleaned out routinely to remove
accumulated sludges (which are considered routinely generated F037 and F038
wastes). Based on information provided in the TC questionnaire, ve estimated
the quantity of wastes generated from. these routine tank cleanouts to be on a
average one-third as much as the quantity of wastes generated frora the
cleanout of surface impoundments. Calculations for surface i.-r.pour.dment
cleanout {based on settling of solids In an impoundment that is cleaned out
evry five years on the average) and for tank cleanouts (based on the
calculations for surface impoundment cleano.it) are presented below.
Quantity of sludge generated from' the surface impoundments that h3ve been
closed: -
Equalization basin volume: 2,239,000 cu.ft.2
Flow - 2,300,000 gallons/day - 307,510 cu.ft./day
Hydraulic retention time (HR7*: 2,239,000 cu.ft. / 307,510 cu.ft./day - 7.3
day - 175.2 hours
Settling calculations show that the HRT is sufficient for complete settling o
solids and removal of oil.
Solids and oil settling in basin: 75.4 tons/yr + 71.2 tor.s/yr - 146.6
tons/yr
Drag-out sludge from basins and impoundments contain an average of 65 percent
water"; therefore, the F037 waste volume accumulating in the basin is
estimated at (146.6 tons/yr)/(1-.65)- 418.9 tons/yr.
Quantity of sludge generated from tanks:
419 tons of surface impoundment sludge x 1/317 - 140 ton/yr of tank sludge.
Aasount of F037 sludge from annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries, with known sewer clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinery: (365 tons/yr" K049 + 158 tons/yr
KO51)/ 2,300,000 gallor.s/day -
0.000227
Sewer clean out anount: 0.000227 x 800 acres land area of refinery x
143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading of
1.0 calculated from known refinery) - 26.10
tons/yr
-------
N
IT
CU
cr
A-
O
-------
P037 AMD P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USt AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility ft: 26
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state report ing requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery daca base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basts for F037 and F038 waste estlnmtlon:
EPA used data frcra the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 332 tons/yr
-------
Facility # 26
Crude capacity: 1C.OOO barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 123.000 gallons/day2
K waste generation:
K051: L?6 tons/year2
Assure?cions ;
Facility Group 74
K049 corcpo-sition: 40 percent varer, 48 percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
weight5
K051 composition: 65 percent water, 45 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
API separator solids removal efficiency; 50 percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
Oil in the API skinning (to slop oil system): 50 percent7
Slop oil emulsion solids (KQ4?) was not reported in TSDR survey or PR03:
therefore, an estimated K049 quantity of tons/yr was based on 1.38 metric
tons/vr (or 1.52 tons/yr) per 1.000 barrels/day*
Estisation:
Solids in the API sludge (K0S1): (0,2 >: 126 tons/yr) - 25.2 tons/yr
Solids in the API skimming (removed as K049); (0.12 x 14 tons/yr) - 1.6S
tor.s/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 25.2 tor.s/yr + 1.68 tons/yr - 26,88
tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: <26.83 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids
removal eff.) - 53.76 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 53.76 tons/yr - 26,88 tons/yr -
26.88 tons/yr
Quantity of API skinning: (0.52 K049 water & solids content) x 14 tons/yr)
/ (1.0 - 0.5 oil in API skimming) - 14.56
tons/yr
Oil in API skimming; 14.56 tons/yr x 0.5 - 7.28 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0,15 x 126 tons/yr) - 18.9 tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator: 7.28 tons/yr + 18.9 tons/yr - 26.18
tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: 26.18 tons/vr) / (0.75 API oil removal eff.) -
34.9 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater 3^.9 tons/yr - 26.18 tons/yr - 8.72 tons/yr
Since cost F037 and F038 wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also land dispose F037 and F038 wastes. Because EPA has
not received notification from this refinery identifying land based units
(e.g.. surface impoundments) accepting newly identified TC wastes, EPA assumes
that the surface iirpouncLtitr.ts have been closed and the functions of the
-------
surface impoundments have been replaced by tanks. EPA believes chat tanks
replacing surface impoundments would'be cleaned out routinely to remove
accumulated sludges (which are considered routinely generated F037 and F03S
wastes). Based on information f rovided in the TC questionnaire, ve estimated
the quantity of wastes generated from these routine tank cleanouts to be on an
average one-third as much as the quantity of wastes generated from the
cleanout of surface impound.ter.ts Calculations for surface impoundment
cleanout (based on settling of solids in an impoundment that is cleaned out
every five years cri the averse* and for tank cleanouts (based on the
calculations for surface impoundment cleanout^ are presented below.
Quantity of sludge generated ito:r. the surface impoundments that have been
closed:
Equalization basin volume: £ 10 .000 cu.f t.2
Flow - 123,000 gallons/day - lC,J*b cu.ft./day
Hydraulic retention time (HP.7) 1 S19.000 cu,ft. / 16,•w5 cu.ft./day - 49.S day
- 1195.2 hours
Settling calculations show* tr..\ r t he HRT is sufficient for complete settling of
solids and removal of oil.
Solids and oil settling in basin 26.S3 tons/yr + 8.72 tons/yr - 35.6
cc-r.s'yr
Drag-out sludge from basins and impoundments contain an average of 65 percent
water13: therefore, the F037 waste volume accumulating in the basin is
estimated at (35.6 tons/yr)/'1 * 65)- 101,7 tons/yr.
Amount of F waste sludge from upstream surface impoundment:
13,939 sq.ft area of the surface impoundment x 2 ft depth of the
sludge14 x 63 lb/cu,ft density of the sludge - 1,756,314 lb - 873 tons
Quantity of sludge generated fro* tanks:
980 tons of surface impoundment sludge x 1/317 - 327 ton/yr of tank sludge.
Amount of F037 sludge from annua L refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with knovr. s«»ver clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinery: (14 tons/yr K049 + 126 tons/yr
K051)/ 123,000 gallons/day -
0.00113S
Sewer clean out amount; 0 001138 x 32 acres land area of refinery x
143.7 tons/(vr/acre) (for solids loading of
1.0 calculated from known refinery) - 5.23
t ons/yr
-------
WW ¦
4"26
Low C^t£
—
Totstb&
fotg
FE P
fi/ -
fori
-------
F037 AND P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility #: 27
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Fetroleus refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 vaste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 vaste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 3,401 tons/yr
-------
Facility # 27
Crude capacity; Not reported
Wastewater flow: 810,000 gallons/d/iy*
K waste generation:
K051: 2H0 t «.n;;/-.v:, v*
Assumptions:
Facility Croup 64
K051 composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
API separator solids remove' efficiency: 50 percent6
API separator oil removal < t i ic i<-ucy : 75 percent6
Estimation:
Solid' in the API sludge (K051): (0,2 x 280 tons/yr) - 56 tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (56 tons/yr) / (0,5 API solids
removal eff.) - 112 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 112 tons/yr - 56 tons/yr - 56
tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): £0.15 x 280 tons/yr) - 62 tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: 42 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal eff.) - 56
tonn/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 56 cons/yr - 42 tons/yr - 14 tons/yr
Since most F037 and F038 wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also 1nnd dispose F037 and F038 wastes. Because EPA has
not received notification from this refinery identifying land based units
(e.g., surface impoundments) accept ing newly identified TC wastes, EPA assumes
that the surface impoundments have been closed and the functions of the
surface impoundments have been replaced by tanks. EPA believes that tanks
replacing surface impoundments would be cleaned out routinely to remove
accumulated sludges (which are considered routinely generated F037 and F038
wastes). Based on information provided in the TC questionnaire, we estimated
the quantity of wastes generated from these routine tank cleanouts to be on an
average one-third as i$uch as the quantity of wastes generated from the
cleanout of surface impoundments. Calculations for surface impoundment
cleanout (based on settling of solid.*; in an impoundment that is cleaned out
every five years on the average) and for tank cleanouts (based on the
calculations for surface impoundment cleanout) are presented below.
Quantity of sludge generated from the surface impoundments that have been
closed:
Equalization basin volume : 40f>, 000 cu.ft,2
Flow - 810,000 gallons/day - 108,2V/ ru.ft./day
Hydraulic retention time (HRT) ; MJ'i.OOO cu.ft. /-108.297 cu. ft./day - 3.8 day
- , 2 hours
-------
Settling calculations show that the HRT is sufficient for complete settling of
solids and removal of oil.
Solids and oil settling in basin: ' 56 tons/yr + 14 tons/yr - 70 tons/yr
Drag-out sludge from basins and impoundments contain an average of 65 percent
water": therefore, the F037 waste volume accumulating in the basin is
estimated at (70 tons/yr)/(1-.65)- 200 tons/yr.
Amount of F waste sludge from upstream surface impoundment:
157,687 sq.ft area of the surface impoundrcent x 2 ft depth of the
sludge1' x 63 Ib/cu.ft density of the sludge - 19.868,562 lb - 9,934 tons
Quantity of sludge generated from tanks:
10,134 tons of surface impoundment sludge x 1/317 - 3,378 ton/yr of tank
sludge.
Amount of F037 sludge from annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):'5
Solids loading of refinery: (280 tons/yr K051)/ 810,000
gallons/day - 0.000346
Sewer clean out amount: 0.000346 x 466 acres land area of refinery x
143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading of
1.0 calculated from known refinery) - 23.17
tons/yr
-------
P037 AND P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Fact!icy if: 28
Para sources available:
Petroleum refinery visics/voluntarv submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatrr.ent, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey ci Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refiners- data base (PP.DB)
No-reigration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for FQ37 and F038 vaste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide snore recent data.
F03? and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 609 tons/yr
Surface impoundment sludge:
July of 1992 to January of 1993: 3,396 ton
January of 1993 to January of 1994: 10,792 ton
January of 19-4 to July of 1994: 5,396 ton
-------
P03? AND PQ38 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility #: 29
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (ISDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
_____ California hazardous vaste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments frosi the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 vaste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
FQ37 and F038 waste estimates:
FOB? (routine) - 24 tons/yr
-------
facility # 29
Crude capacity: 2,900 barrels/dav1
Wastewater flow 2,000 gallons/day2
Assuaptions:
Facility Croup i4
Estioation:
Amount of F037 sludge fros annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities);'5
Sclids loading of re:.nery: (8 tons/yr K04 9 + 12 tons/yr K051)/
2,000 gallons/day - 0.0098
Sewer clean out ansour.t: 0.0098 x 17 acres land area of refinery x
143,7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading of
1,0 calculated froa known refinery) - 23.94
tons/yr
-------
4" > °\
r^a:
API- -7*
51
4/
FcWI
KPbEi>fa
fer«o
-------
F037 AKD F038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility #: 30
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment. Storage, Disposal.
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Vaste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
"o-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 vaste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 2 tor.s/yr
-------
Facility % 30
Crude capacity: Not reported
Wastewater flow: 36,000 gallons/day^
Facility Croup uS
Estimation:
AnounC of F037 sludge froc annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with fenovn sever clean out quantities):'5
Solids loading of refirery: (9 tons/yr K0<»9 + 17 tons/yr K051)/
36,000 gallons/day - 0.000722
Sewer clean out acount: 0.000722 x 20 acres land area of refinery x
143.7 tor,s/(yr/acre) (for solids loading of
1,0 calculated from known refinery) - 2.08
tons/yr
-------
-4-
0'- -\\-
TdV
<-
9rnoy.
-------
P037 AXD P03 6 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AMD TRACKING SHEET
Facility 31
Data sources available;
Petroleum refinery visi ts/val ur: '«ry submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment. Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Vaste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waM<* data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (FRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments free the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Sasis for FQ37 and F038 waste estimation;
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F033 vaste estimates:
F037 (routine)
- 19 tcr.s/yr
-------
Facility # 31
Crude capacity: 10,000 barrels 'day*
Wastewater flow: 17,000 ga 1 lor.s/dny2
Assumptions:
Facility Group 4 4
K049 composition: 40 percent v.uc-r, 48 percent
oil
, and 12 percent solids by
weight5
K051 composition: 65 percent w,»?t-r, 15 percent
oil
, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
API separator solids rercoval efficiency:
50
percent6
API separator oil removal e f f 1 c i ency :
75
percent6
Oil in the API skimming (t? slop oil system):
50
percent7
Slop oil emulsion solids (K04 9) was not reported in TSDR survey or PRDB;
therefore, an estimated K049 quantity of 15 tons/yr was based on 1.3S icetric
tons/yr (or 1.52 tons/yr) per 1,000 barrels/day8
Estimation:
Amount of F037 sludf.e from annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sever clean out quantities):15
Solids luading of refinerv: <15 tons/yr K049 + 34 tons/vr K051)/
17,000 gallons/day - 0,004047
Sewer clean out acount: 0.004047 x 33 acres land area of refinery x
143,7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading of
1.0 calculated from known refinery) - 19.19
tons/yr
-------
# 3)
ftfii
>ms
¦kri
Ok^'mW
PoUl
4fo37
—^
4u>T>
0*$
*- : rtAj luCLUCtC SETTUtJ^
-------
P037 AND F038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility it: 32
Data sources available:
— > Petroleum refiners' visits/volur* ary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleuns refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
FQ37 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) «¦ 3 tons/yr
-------
Facility # 32
Crude capacity: 6.200 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 11,000 gallons/day*
Facility Croup 44
Est lear ion:
Aaount of F037 sludge frora annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities);'5
Solids loading of refinery: (3 tons/yr K049 4 9 tons/vr K031)/
11,000 gallons/day - 0.001091
Sewer clean out amount 0.001091 x 20 acres land area of refinery x
143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading of
1.0 calculated from known refinery) - 3.14
tons/yr
-------
M 32_
4PX
-------
P037 AKD P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AKD TRACKING SHEET
Facility i'r. 33
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Vnstc Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of razardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requi recents
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleums refinery data base CPRDB)
No-migration petitions
Cocrjxents from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste esticatlon:
EFA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 vaste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 508 tons/yr
FQ38 (routine) - 292 tons/yr
-------
Facility # 33
Crude capacity: 75,000 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 800,000 gallons/day2
K waste generation:
KG51: 890 tons/year1
Assuapt ions:
Facility Croup 5.04
K051 composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent oil. and 20 percent solids by
weight5
API separator solids removal efficiency: 30 percent'
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
Floatator unit solids rczsviefficiency: 50 percent6
Floatator unit oil removal efficiency: 85 percent6
Estiaation:
Solids in the API sludge (K051):
Solids in API influent wastewater:
Solids in API effluent wastewater:
(0,2 x 890 tons/yr) - 178 tons/yr
(178 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids
removal eff.) - 356 tons/yr
356 tons/yr - 178 tons/yr - 178
tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K0S1): (0.15 x 890 tons/yr) - 133.5 tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: 133.5 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal eff.) -
178 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 178 tons/yr - 133.5 tons/yr - 44.5 tons/yr
Solids in Floatator (F03S): (178 ton/yr) x (0.5 Floatator solid removal
efficiency) - 89 ton/yr
Oil in Floatator (F038): (44.5 ton/yr) x (0.85 Floatator oil removal
efficiency) - 37.825 ton/yr
F038 sludge from Floatator clean out: (37.8 tons/yr solid settling in
Floatator)/(0.13 fraction of oil in
the floatator sludge)- 292 tons/yr
Solids in Floatator effluent wastewater: 178 tons/yr from API separator - 89
ton/yr - 89 tons/yr
Oil in Floatator effluent wastewater: (44.5 ton/yr) x (1 - 0.85 oil
removal efficiency) - 6.675 tons/yr
The turbulence caused by the aeration coupled with the short residence time in
the Floatator unit prevents significant settling; therefore, we examined
settling characteristics in the equalization basin.
Since most F037 and F038 wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also land dIspo:.c F037 and F038 wastes. Because' EPA has
not received notification fro= this refinery identifying land based units
(e.g., surface -impoundments) accepting newly identified TC wastes, EPA assumes
-------
that the surface impoundments have been closed and the functions of the
surface impoundments have been replaced by tanks. EPA believes that tanks
replacing surface impoundments would be cleaned out routinely to remove
accumulated sludges (which are considered routinely generated F037 and F038
wastes). Based on information provided in the TC questionnaire, we estimated
the quantity of wastes generated from these routine tank cleanouts to be on an
average one-third as tcuch as the quantity of wastes generated from the
cleanout of surface impoundments. Calculations for surface impoundment
cleanout (based on settling of solids in an impoundment that is cleaned out
every five years on the average) and for tank cleanouts (based on the
calculations for surface impoundment clersnout) are presented below.
Quantity of sludge generated from the surface impoundments that have been
closed:
Equalization basin volume: 5,466.000 cu.ft.'
Flow - 800,000 gallons/day - 106.960 cu.ft./day
Hydraulic retention tide ;H?.T): 5,466,000 cu.ft. / 106,960 cu.ft./day - 51.OS
day - 1225.92 hours
Settling calculations show that the HRT is sufficient for complete settling of
solids and removal of oil.
Solids and oil settling in basin: 39 tons/yr + 6.673 tons/yr - 96
tons/yr
Drag-out sludge fron basins and impoundments contain an average of 65 percent
water13; therefore, the F037 waste volume accumulating in the basin is
estimated at (96 tons/yr)/(1-,65)- 273 tons/vr.
Quantity of sludge generated from tanks:
1,371 tons of surface impoundment sludge x 1/317 - 457 ton/yr of tank sludge.
~¦jrount of F037 sludge from annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):'5
Solids loading of refinery: (890 tons/yr K051)/ 800,000
gallons/day - 0.001113
Sewer clean out amount: 0.001113 x 320 acres land area of refinery x
143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading of
1.0 calculated from known refinery) - 51
tons/yr
-------
QUESTIONNAIRE . - QUESTION 63
WASTE HATER TREATMENT
ilolloruatcr Cooling Tower
owdoun
Lime Pondc
Equalization
Pond
Cold Water Lime
Treacer Blou
¦juntt, Gr
I'.'- 5 I
3
°56906
4t3^>
AerationI n lagoon I > To HIM
Pond Pond 111 Bcliai
-------
P03? AND P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS;
DATA OSE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility #: 34
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (ISDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous U'.iste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste- da ra base
x Petroleum refinery data bast: (F'RDB)
No-migration petitions
Continents from the proposed rule
. Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data froo the above sources because the refinery d'id not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 vaste estjgates:
FOB? (routine) - 30? tens/yr
-------
Facility * 34
Crude capacity: 42,500 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 360,000 gallons/day2
K waste generation:
KO-S: 35 7 cor.s/year5
KC51: S5 7 tons/year3
Assumptions:
Facility Group 54
ter, 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
K05J composition: 65 percent
weight5
API separator solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency:
DAF unit solids removal effi-iency:
DAF unit oil removal el'fici'-r -v:
75 percent6
50 percent6
85 percent6
Estimation:
Solids In the API sludge (K.051):
Solids In API influent was rev-, ter:
Solids In API effluent wastewater:
Oil in
Oil in
Oil in
Solids
Oil in
Sol ids
Oil in
API sludge (K051):
API influent wastewa:
(0.2 x 857 tons/yr) - 171.4 tor,s/yr
(171.4 cons/yr) / (0.5 API solids
removal eff.) - 342.8 tons/yr
342.S tons/yr - 171.4 tens/yr ¦»
171.4 tonr/yr
(0.15 x 857 tons/yr) - 128.55 tons/yr
: 128.53 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal eff.)
- 171.4 tons/yr
API effluent wastewater: 171.4 tons/yr -¦ 128,55 tons/yr - 42.85 tons/yr
in DAF float (K048): (171,4 ton/yr) x (0.5 DAF solid removal
efficiency) - 85.7 ton/yr
DAF float (K048): (42.85 ton/yr) x (0.85 DAF oil removal
efficiency) - 36.4225 ton/yr
in DAF effluent wastewater: 171.4 tons/yr from API separator -
85,7 ton/yr - 85.7 tons/yr
DAF effluent wastewater: (42.85 ton/yr) x (1 - 0.85 oil removal
efficiency) - 6.4275 tons/yr
The turbulence caused by the aeration coupled with the short residence time in
the DAF unit prevents significant settling; therefore, we examined settling
characteristics in the equalization basin.
since most F037 and F038 wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also land dispose F037 and F038 wastes. Because EPA has
not received notification from this refinery identifying land based units
(e.g., surface impoundments) accepting newly identified TC wastes, EPA assumes
ti,at the surface icpounda.er.ts have been closed and the functions of the
surface impoundments have been replaced by tanks. EPA believes that tanks
replacing surface impoundments would be cleaned out routinely to remove
accumulated sludges (which are considered routinely generated F037 and F038
wastes). Based on information provided in the TC questionnaire, we estimated
-------
the quantity of wastes generated from these routine tank cleanouts to be on an
average one-third as such as the quantity of wastes generated from the
cleanout of surface impoundments. Calculations for surface impoundment
cleanout (based on settling of solids in an impoundment that is cleaned out
every five years on the average) and for tank cleanouts (based on the
calculations for surface impoundment cleanout) are presented below.
Quantity of sludge generated fron the surface impoundments that have been
closed:
Equalization basin volune: 2,007,000 cu.ft,2
Flow - 360,000 gallons/day - iS,132 cu.ft./day
Hydraulic retention title (HRT): 2,007,000 cu.ft. / 48,132 cu.ft./day - 41.7
day - 1000.80 hours
Settling calculations show that the HRT is sufficient for complete settling of
solids and removal of oil.
Solids and oil settling in basin: 85.7 tons/yr + 6.4275 tons/yr - 92
tons/yr
Drag-out sludge from basins and impoundments contain an average of 65 percent
water"; therefore, the F037 waste volume accumulating in the basin is
estimated at (92 tons/yr)/(l-,65)« 263 tons/yr,
Quai.tity of sludge generated from tanks:
263 tons of surface impoundment sludge x 1/317 - 88 ton/yr of tank sludge.
Anount of F037 sludge fro® annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities);'5
Solids loading of refinery: (8S7 tons/yr K048 + 857 tons/yr
K051)/ 360.000 gallons/day -
0.004761
V
Sewer clean out anount: 0,004761 x 320 acres land area of refinery x
143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading of
1,0 calculated from known refinery) - 219
tons/yr
-------
Detailed Scheaatia of Tank No. 1
API
Separator
IIU
K051
=H
NIIW Water
DAf
Unl t
IIW
Koiia
nt-r^s ^
> To HPDES
Discharge
i-fw i«i
Tank No. i
2k
50WT
¦^TKifrLi
Ho
IIW
Dewaterej
Sludge to
Land Farm
i
KoSi
-------
CD
O
JUL 1987
81-25
-------
P037 AMD P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility ft: 35
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
arid Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x Rational Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Corcirents from the proposed rule
x Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data,
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 1550 tons/yr
-------
F037 AND P03 8 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility if: 36
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment. Storage. Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey;
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardnu- waste data base
x Petroleum re'finery data base (PRDB)
Ko-niigration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
* Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and FQ38 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 98 tor.s/yr
F mix waste (routine) - 1.133 tons/yr
-------
P037 AXD PQ38 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility #; 37
Data sources available:
Petroleua refinery visits/volur,tary submission
x Hational Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities~(TSDR survey)
x Hatior.al Survey of Hazardous Vaste Generators
Bietjnial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleua refinery data base (PROS)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
x Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide core recent data.
F037 and F033 vaste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 120 tons/yr
-------
Facility t 37
Crude capacity: 330,000 barrels/dav'
Wastewater flow: 5,760,000 gallons/d.-iy*
K waste generation:
K0i8: 300 torn./year5
K0-*9; 2,095 tfsns/vear3
K051; - toi.K/vi-.ir5
Assuartions:
Facility Group 1'
K049 composition: 40 percent water. 48 percent
weight5
K051 composition: 65 percent v.»i«r. 15 percent
weight5
API separator solids removal e££icii-iicy'
API separator oil removal efficiency:
DAF unit solids removal efficiency:
DAF unit oil removal efficiency:
Oil in the API skimming (to slop oil tern):
Estimation:
Amount of FG37 sludge from annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities}:15
Solids loading of refinerv: (900 tcr.s/yr K0&8 + 2,095 tons/yr
K069 + 4 tons/yr K0S1)/ 5,760,000
gallons/day - 0,000521
Sewer clean out amount: 0,000521 x 1,600 acres land area of refinery
x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading of
1.0 calculated from known refinery) - 120
tons/yr
This refinery has surface impoundments that will close uith F037/8
wastes in place. Therefore, the surface impoundment wastes will not require
alternative treatment.
oil, and 12 percent solids by
oil, and 20 percent solids by
50 percent4
75 percent®
50 percent6
85 percent6
50 percent'
-------
I
COOltNQ
TOWER
BtOW-
POWN
U~£ W*Ti£
•1
H-; vki ».
/"
i' W
iVASTE
ACIO
REFINERY
/ ,
DEEP WELL
DISPOSAL
CAUSTIC
WATERS
aoun WATER
REFINERY
PROCESS
OIL
SEWER
~T
I
BALLAST
WATER
NEUTRALIZATION
I
API SEPARATOR
UNIT
L
j
311
K ' |
S I
ol1
s! I
!!'
2 I I-
O I
/ * *- —
^ -hkv il> ac,-
-------
OILY WATER
($u*r*4. r-,4,uvc*»iMr)>
m ;*r
COMTAMHATEO WATER
ftr rhiYs*^
AERATION
BABtt
/¦> »• h>'i|'v.CW
EQUAL-
IZATION
OA9M
•V* -
Ail
FLOTATION
CLAY POND
#3
API
SEPARATOR
RETENTION/
NEUTRALIZATION
BASIN
ic/tft/ta
LUBE PLANT
WASTEWATER FLOW
-------
P037 AKD FQ38 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USB AND TRACKING SHEET
Facil icy i?: 38
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary .ubmission
x National Survey of Hazardour. Vnste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous V/istc Generators
Biennial report/state- reporting requireir.ents
California hazardous vaste ri/U;s base
x Petroleum refinery data bast- (J'KDB)
No-nsigration petitions
x Comments from the proposed rule*
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F01? and F038 vaste estiisarion:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and FQ38 vaste estimates;
F037 (routine) - 3,0S7 tons/yr
F037 (surface impoundments) - tons (7/92 - 12/92)
F037 (surface impoundments) « 103600 tons (1/93 - 12/93)
F037 (surface impoundments) - 0 tons (1/94 - 6/94)
-------
P037 AND P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility 0: 39
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Vaste Treatrcent, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Vaste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous vaste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 vaste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 vaste estimates:
F037 (routine)
- 1.02& cons/yr
-------
F03? AND FQ38 HASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility m: 40
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous vaster data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB) "
No-migration petitions
x Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for FQ3? and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 136 tons/yr
F037 (surface impoundments) - 1,800 tons (7-92 - 12/92)
F03? (surface impoundments) - 0 tons (1/93 - 12/93)
F037 (surface impoundments) - 0 tons (1/94 - 6/94)
-------
F037 AND PO30 WASTE CAPACITY AKALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING.SHEET
Facility 41
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment. Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Cortrcents from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F03S waste estimates:
F03? (routine) - 5,151 tor.s/yr
-------
Facility tt 41
Crude capacity: 175,000 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 2,160,000 gallons/day2
K waste generation:
K048: 4,865 tons/year^
K049: 4.86 5 tons/year5
K051: 4,86 5 tons/year3
Assumptions:
Facility Group 44
K049 composition: 40 percent wat«-r.
weight5
K051 composition: 65 percent water,
weight5
API separator solids reitoval effici
API separator oil reitoval effivirnc
DAF unit solids reooval efficiency:
DAF unit oil removal efficiency.
Oil in the API skioaing (to slop oi
IAF float (F03S) had been mislabeled as DAF float (K048). The amount of IAF
is 4,865 tons/yr.
Estimation:
Solids in the API sludge (K051): (0.2 x 4,865 tons/yr) - 973 tons/yr
Solids in the API skimming (reciovvd as K049): (0.12 x 4,865 tons/yr) - S83.8
tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 973 tons/yr + 583.8 tons/yr - 1556,8
tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (1556.8 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids
removal eff.) - 3113.6 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 3113.6 tons/yr - 1556.8 tons/yr -
1556.8 tons/yr
Quantity of API skimming: (0.52 K049 water & solids content) x 4,865
tons/yr) / (1.0 - 0.5 oil in API skimming) -
5059.6 tons/yr
Oil in API skinsning: 5059.6 tons/yr x 0.5 - 2529.8 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0.15 x 4,865 tons/yr) - 729.75 tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator: 2529.8 tons/yr + 729.75 tons/yr -
3259.55 tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: 3259.55 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal eff.)
- 4346.1 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 4346.1 tons/yr • 3259,55 tons/yr - 1086.55
tons/yr
Solids in DAF float (K048): (1556.8 ton/yr) x (0.5 DAF solid removal
efficiency) - 778.4 ton/yr
Oil in DAF float (K04S): (1086.55 ton/yr) x (0.85 DAF oil removal
efficiency; - 923.5675 ton/yr
48 percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
15 percent oil. and 20 percent solids by
ency: 50 percent6
y; 75 percent6
50 percent4
85 percent6
1 system): 50 percent7
-------
Solids in DAF effluent wastewater: 1556.8 tons/yr from API separator -
778.4 ton/yr - 778.4 tons/vr
Oil In DAF effluent wastewater: (1086.55 ton/yr) x <1 • 0.85 oil removal
efficiency) - 162.9825 tons/yr
Amount of F037 sludge froir annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer rlean out quantities);'5
Solids loading of refinery: -'.,865 tons/yr K048 + 4,865 tons/yr
K049 + 4,865 tons/yr K051)/
2,160,000 gallons/day - 0.006757
Sewer clean out amount: 0.006757 ¦/. 294 acres land area of refiner- x
14 3.7 tons/(yr/aere) (for solids loading of
1.0 calculated from known refinery) - 285
tons/yr
-------
« «— 0
» »
Nmw
(*aSTE wauh
MIXTURE)
TO AlUOS VIA
POLLUnON CONTROL
WASH WATER
TKEaUNG
SYSTEU
IKS
H
IIHW
10 PROCESS
(RCCYCll on) rx K'..,
>» .-.i, to orfsaV^Vf"
i DISPOSAL KoSl
i i
*4ji, JtH
HW
(DEWAIEREO SLUDGE)
NHW
10 HPOtS it) -,-iu i
DISCHARGE
TREATED WAS TV WA HH
, effluent)
O
HW
(OILY SLUDGE
COMPOSITE)
IIMW
yis
(SOUR PROCESS
WATER)
Boot-
Dotfi
#2 COKER
PROCESS
SYSTEM
¦ tut, ut w»-
(RECYCIE OIL)
(PRODUCT)
to PROCESS
to IRANSPORTATION
/MARKETING
NHW
(VENT CAS)
#4"
SOUR WATER
caiEcnoM.
TREATMENT
*
INJECTION WILLS
TKS. -4j*-4»-
-jSiioxS b
' il^JtiT
llfc
(SPENT CAUSTIC
WATER)
N MW
(RECYCLE 0.1)
£ fo ?a-> l"3-"
Cb6t&
TO PHQClSi.
*¦
DcAi
NHW
10 SI unci l;HOCLii
(SLUOCE)
i>v.-vt r«-s
HW
(SOUR WATER BOTTOMS)
VS
SPENT CAUSTIC
SYSIEM
IKS.
m-,
HW
(CAUSTIC RECOvlHEO
fOK IKNl'FiClAl
REUSE)
11) 01 I SlIL'
PKOCLSS
TO AlMOS VIA SUPPLEMENTAL
Off SPEC USED OIL FUEL BURNING
TWi
Off SPEC
USED OIL t
(ASO FROM
PROCESS)
AtKYLAHON
NEUTRALIZATION
SYSTEM
' I-
Off SPEC
USED (HI
(ASO OIL)
(NEUTRALIZED
WASTEWATER)
TO PROCESS
TO WASTEWATER
TREATUENI SYSTEM
Mff
WtH.CuTT
A***
K> &T*r -B5—. D«o«n by
1 br
0«U
f-5-TT
I
DWG. NO.
IS9-0827B/-A -1200
REV.
A
-------
POLYMER
OIIY WATER
SEPARATION
wsr-4,*,a?,jo/
MrMrM-
47 wl
«a. i*r
NHW
NHW
10 PHOCESS
IIW
(APf SEPARATOR
SUJUCE. MEAT
EXCHANGER UUNOIE
at AMINO SLUDGE)
(HECYCIE Oil)
HW
(slop oil muisiON soiios)
NHW
HW
(iaF SLUDGE)
(waste ACTIVATED SLUDGE)
ii, i /„ -r itfj) (Tok^b-i A'crJ, xofi
tii. i'(T
TO Off SITE
Disposal
: in. „
(DEwaTEREO SLUDGE)
HW w
0 (
TO PROCESS
(|2 COKER)
WASTEWATER
TREATMENT
WS. M.12.14-23
46 Wl, 52 WT
36 Wl. 66 Wl
COLLECTION
-TH^r—i.'3;5-10-
T*Sr~S+-«;M.2»
32—32,4G-^?—
l-W^r^S^-
66- W,- JA
SLUDGE
PROCESS 1-4
IKS. 13- t6.*>
38 Wl. 40 wr
2ST, 42 Wl
IHSS QftAMHG )& COMPUTE* CJNt**TlO *0* Him
ort «r«uo (XKuwAi c*ii
*n su«vt y
ott-wuo ic»iiM*nc
**Sft *»Md *vsitu
—
DRAMNG ISSUE
•*
6* _ fitCfl lk«#« Is, Ml ._O^U_i-.l0 fl/_
W« ...fiO"C .&r pgu ... v *'
—
DWG. NO. 15
-------
{TREATED VENT CAsf 10 A,U0SP,,EKE
V€NI
PACKAGE
IK. 4?
13 AP
¦fcfe'a&M
(SOUR PROCESS WATER)
SOUR WATER
ACCUUUlATlON
ths. t» a
4484,84
tjiQj J l.-|. y*« *
JL
NHW
(VENT CAS)
MW
2A
~ (SOUR WA~TER)
SOUR WATER
STORAGE
IKS. i,i
2ST
(IHEA1EC
SOUR WATtR)
SOUft WAIER
OlSPOSAL
UNDERGROUND
1NJECHON
VrftLLS
40
HW | (SOUR PROCESS
O | WATER)
IK. 45
21,47.64 WT
(SLUDGE)
MW
(1REA1ED SOUR WATER)
NHW / :
(RECYCLE Oil)
V yc*U-
¦ TO PROCESS
3
TO SLUDGE
PROCESS
IN PLACE
. NOT YCT IN SERVICE
Tilts CftAtfMC IS COuPUttN CCMCftAriO. rOft Him
OH HfVtSCO OKlCiNAl C*u 604/2*8-792*
"•
m
ORAWNQ issue
Ol
MMtHir
r.(vJ
"EH
¦wimi u Mtrxv
*n sosvir
OflMCD SOUwaHC
SQtM WAfTS CUIICliOn k mttCMtt SiUlw
0«ilfjn«t4 br . - CdDfi !>e»« by
Seoi, . ..C*>«cH4 ht
.fiii _ _ Pol. I:1G:&I.
nau -
DWG. NO.
169-082/8? a- 1202
REV.
A'
-------
HW
(spent caustic
WATER)
SPENT CAUSTIC
ACCUMULATION
sa >».«> «:
JA
1
if, >fo To^S
HW
(SPENT CAUSTIC WATER)
SPENT
CAUSTIC
STORAGE
TXS. -ai tftW-
2 ST
HW
(CAUSTIC RECOVERED
FOR BENEFICIAL
REUSE)
TO orfSME I'HOCtiS
(SOUR WATER BOTTOUS)
10 SOUR WA1ER
• COLLECTION
rms OftAWMC IS cowpgra CtXfKAUD fQ* H£W
c* *c*sro owqnmi c*ii 504/7 ~~-m*
b*
I*
QRAMNG ISSUE
m
At Mk«l
Rfl SUMVtt
DC!MIO SC»t(»«IiC
setMt c
-------
HHW
O
(CULT SlUDM
composite fRou
WASlt WATER
mcMuiNt
SYS1CU)
10 REf'NERV
PROCESSING
NHW
TO TRANSPORTATION
/UARKE11NG
(PRODUCT)
» 1
Oft t[viyo OffiONAl CAll 30«/a**~ 7*2*
*n su«vtr
OCfMCO SOiCuAltC
fi crwin phoci i»s
-•*
DRAMNO ISSUE
D»«lgn»4 bf . . ££?Q__ &7 . .. RJU OwU _ 1 1(1 8*
5i«. . !'«<£ t, .•>;.•) n,i. i f
R£V.
A
«"U aj *•*»
DWG' H0- 1i9-OB2;B?-A i.'im
r
o»»a-rt n« a
-------
SOOUIU
hXDlL.
OFF SPEC
USEOOil.
OFf SPEC
USED Oil
TO SUPPlfufNlAi. OFF
SPEC fUEl UUKNiNG
(ASO OIL)
off spec
USED Oil.
7K. 101
(ASO FROM
PROCESS))
(ASO OIL)
TO PROCESS
TO WASTE WA1CR
TREATmEnI
SYSTEM
CAI CltJM
HW
NHW
TK. 102
TK. 103
66 WT
CHLORIDE \
NHW
(CAFL SLUDCE)
THiS ORAMNC 1$ tOUPUTtA CtNfHATlO. FOR NEW
OK H£HSfO QHiGlNAl CALL >04/3««-7»7»
«n SuHvir
OCTMlO SO.IuaHC
MHY NfIJ1RAl i?aHilf| Svsnu
DRAWNO ISSUE
» — GDQ Dro.rt br ft A) Oji« 2 - !Q - 0 ? _
r«0Nf br ooi.
DWG. NO.
150-0B2787-A-l20b
-------
O u*>^
i
' ix?^T (**»")
C.SSkT Uv>
TK 3
H»5^
'||| 4 ft-
"7oc)v I (rt**0
1
-------
F03? AND P03 8 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS;
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility i'r- ^2
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visit.1;/voIuntatv submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment. Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data hast* (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Cosncents from the proposed rule
x Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the abbve sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data,
FQ37 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 3,597 tons/yr
-------
F037 AND F03 8 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility r' i
Data yo'irt'fS nv.i 11 «-ib \ e :
fetrohum refinery vir. 1t .*./voluntary submission
x S4icion.1l Survey of Hazardous War*te Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
k National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report state reporting requirements
California hazardous vastc data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (FRD3)
No-reieration petitions
x Cojixtents from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F017 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 2»1?7 tons/yr
F037 (surface impoundment) - 1750 tons (7/92 - 12/92)
F037 (surface impoundment) - 3500 tons (1/93 - 12/93)
F037 (surface impoundment) - 1750 tons (1/94 - 6/94)
-------
F037 AND P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS;
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility //: 44
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey cf Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazarcc-s waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data basf: (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments froa the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 vaste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide sore recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 331 tons/yr
-------
Facility * 44
Crude capacity: 95,000 barrels/day'
Wastewater flow: 504,000 gallons/day'
Facility Croup 2'
EstimatIon:
Areounc of F037 sludge from annual refinery sever clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with krawn sever clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinery: (2,929 tons/vr K048 + 2,929 tons/y
K051)/ 504,000 gallons/dav -
0.011623
Sewer clean out amount; 0.011623 s 198 acres land area of refinery
143.7 tcins/(yr/acre) (for solids loading of
1.0 calculated from known refinery) - 331
rons/yr
-------
i
REUSE AS FUEL
GO
C7i
tr
O
COKE DRUM
COKER FEED
63 £ J H Cx
PRODUCT
#4-^
SLUDGE
¦^sr
WWT
.t ii S
I, z-j 3
i t>
evt hut
7
-------
\I. ,I "£Wu.W| VV"h'"Uu\h-n"
0Ml- iM ^ | (|o ^vYiyhn./vlo<,J,^)
( <1 ' Q Gyfc">^pr
Q M- / 3
-------
i
REUSE AS FUEL
GO
C7i
tr
O
COKE DRUM
COKER FEED
63 £ J H Cx
PRODUCT
#4-^
SLUDGE
¦^sr
WWT
.t ii S
I, z-j 3
i t>
evt hut
7
-------
\I. ,I "£Wu.W| VV"h'"Uu\h-n"
0Ml- iM ^ | (|o ^vYiyhn./vlo<,J,^)
( <1 ' Q Gyfc">^pr
Q M- / 3
-------
CO
02
WASTE FLOW
t- :
O
ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION
STORM/SURFACE WATER
WASTEWATER
TREATMENT
PLANT
NHW
NHW
BALLAST WATER
PROCESS WASTEWATER
HW SLUDGE
COKER UNIT
OFF-SITE
A
-------
REUSE AS FUEL
eft
o
COKE ORUM
COKER FEED
PRODUCT
WWT
SLUDGE
-------
WA5 * ilWm rcR 1 f RLr*. M
CO
PHOCC SS
wastewater
NHW
COKE
OVEN
BftF
STORM
STORM
PUMP
STATION
ELEMENTARY** 4
NEUTRALIZATION
60WT
CAST PLANT
SEPARATOR
SLUDGE
TANKS
*1, * 2
2 ST
GUINTANA
SEPARATOR
COLLECTION
TANK
-------
F037 AND F038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/volurt submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Was: a Treatment, Storage. Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-ntigration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
x Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data frotc the above sources because the refinery did not
provide store recent data.
FQ37 and F038 waste esticates;
F037 (routine) - 174 tons/yr
F037 (surface impoundments) - 7560 tons (7/92 - 12/92)
F037 (surface icpoundments) - 7360 tons (1/93 - 12/93)
F037 (surface impoundments) - . 0 tons (1/94 - 6/94)
-------
F037 AND F038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility »*: 46
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous waste Treatment, Storage. Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments froc the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and FQ38 waste estimation:
EPA used data froa the above sources because the refinery did not
provide ir.ore recent data,
F03? and FQ38 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 83 tons/yr
-------
P037 AND P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSISt
DATA 0SE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility f?: 4 7
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission »
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSfrR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous vaste d/i tn base
x Petroleum refinery d«*ra base (PRDB)
Ko-raigration petitions
Comments froar the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 vaste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data,
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 7 tons/vr
-------
Facility # 4?
Crude capacity: 115,000 barr*1s/day1
Wastewater flow; 300,000 gallons/day2
K waste generation:
KOiS: 7 tons/year5
K051: 7 tons/year3
Assumptions:
Facility Croup I5
K049 composition: 40 percent water, 48 percent oil, and 12 percent solids by-
weight5
K0S1 composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
API separator solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
DAF unit solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
DAF unit oil removal efficiency: 35 percent6
Estimation:
Solids in the API sludge (K051): (0.2 x 7 tons/yr) - 1.4 tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 1..4 tons/yr + 0 tons/yr - 1.4
tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (1.4 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids removal
eff.) - 2.8 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 2.8 tons/yr - 1,4 tons/yr - 1,4 tor.s/vr
Oil in API sludge (KQ51); <0.15 x 7 tons/yr) - 1.05 tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: 1.05 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal
eff.) - 1.4 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 1.4 tons/yr - 1,05 tons/yr - 0.35 tons/yr
Solids in DAF float (K048): (1,4 ton/yr) x (0,5 DAF solid removal
efficiency) - 0.7 ton/yr
Oil in DAF float'(K048): (0.35 ton/yr) x (0,85 DAF oil removal
efficiency) - 0.2975 ton/yr
Solids in DAF effluent wastewater: 1.4 tons/yr from API separator - 0.7
ton/yr - 0.7 tons/yr
Oil in DAF,effluent wastewater: {0.35 ton/yr) x (1 - 0.85 oil removal
efficiency) - 0.0525 tons/yr
Since most F037 and F038 wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also land dispose F037 and F038 wastes. Because EPA has
n t received notification from this refinery identifying land-based units
(e.g., surface iEpoundaents) accepting newly identified TC wastes, EPA assumes
that the surface impoundments have been closed and the functions of the
surface impoundments have been replaced by tanks. EPA believes that tanks
replacing surface impoundments would be cleaned out routinely to remove
accumulated sludges (which are considered routinely generated F037 and F038
wastes). Based on information provided in the TC questionnaire, we estimated
the quantity of wastes generated from these routine tank cleanouts to be on an
-------
average one-third as much as v«sten generated from cleanout of surface
impoundments. Calculations for surface impoundment cleanout (based on seeding
of solids in an ifnpoundxe r,t that vas cleaned out every five years on the
average) and for tank cleans.::s (ba«;ed on che calculations for surface
impoundment cleanout) are presented be low.
The turbulence caused by -he aeration coupled vith the shore residence tire in
the DAF unit prevents significant settling; therefore, ve examined settling
characteristics in the equalization basin.
Equalization basin volur.e: 619,000 cu.ft.2
Flov - 300,000 gallons/day « -0,110 cu,ft./day
Hydraulic retention tirre s'KRT.1: ^10.000 cu.ft. / "0,110 cu.fr./day - 15 . 1
day - '5 "0.3 2 hours
Settling calculations show that the H?-T is sufficient for complete- settling of
solids and removal of oil.
Solids and oil settling in basin: 0.7 tons/vr + 0.0525 tons/yr = 1 tens/yr
Drag-out sludge from basins and irrpound.-r.cnts contain an average of -S: percent
water13; therefore, the F0;~ vaste vo 1 u.rre accuirulating in the basin is
estimated at (1 tons/yr)/- 1 • •'$)- 2 ror.s/yr.
Quantity of sludge generated fron> tar.ks:
2 tons of surface impoundment sludge x 1/317 - .67 ton/yr of tank slv.cge,
Anount of F037 sludge frosr annual refinery sever clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sever clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refir.erv; (1 tons/vr KO-^8 + 7 tons/vr K031,•/
300,000 gallons/day - 0.00004 7
Sever clean out amount. 0.000047 x 881 acres land area of
refinery x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for
solids loading of 1.0 calculated from
knovn refinery) - 6 tons/yr
-------
c\
4?
1 j
i?*
^ w ^ r"">
¦? iPCW-
U^s ^
-------
F037 AKD 7038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA 0SE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility if: 68
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survry)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous vaste data base
x Petroleun refinery ca;a base (I'RDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
x Organic Toxicity Survey
Sis is for F037 and F038 waste estimation;
EFA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 117 tons/yr
-------
F037 AND F038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility «: 49
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment. Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x PetrcleuiQ refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
FQ37 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 688 tons/yr
-------
F037 AND F038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA OSK AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility igration petitions
x Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 vaste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
FQ37 (routine) - 123 tons/yr
F037 (surface impoundments) - 900 tons (7/92 - 12/92)
F037 (surface impoundments) - 750 tons (1/93 - 12/93)
F037 (surface impoundments) - 0 tons (1/94 - 6/94)
-------
P037 AND P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USS AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility (i: 51
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Was re Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery dar.i base (PRDR)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule;
x Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F03S waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above source-*; because the refinery did not
provide sore recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 145 tons/vr
F037 (surface impoundments) « 280 tons (7/92 • 12/92)
F037 (surface impoundments) - 280 tons (1/93 - 12/93)
F037 (surface impoundments) - 280 tons (1/94 - 6/94)
-------
Facility tf 51
Crude capacity: 51'.000 barrels/day'
Wastewater flow; 230,000 gallons/day2
K waste generation:
K048: 1,236 tons/year3
>1051: 217 tons/year3
Assiltpt ions :
FaciIity Group I4
K049 composition: 40 percent water, 4P, per;<-nt oil, and 12 percent solids bv
weight5
K051 composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent oil. and 20 percent solids bv
weight5
API separator solids removal c-fficiencv: 50 percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
DAF unit solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
DAF unit oil removal efficiercv: 65 percent6
Estimation:
Amount of F03? sludge frois annual refinery sever clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sever cli-an out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinery: (lt236 tons/yr K048 + 217 tons/yr K0SI)/
230,000 gallons/day - 0.00631?
Sewer clean out amount: 0,006317 x 160 acres land area of
refinery x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for
solids loading of 1.0 calculated frorr.
known refinery) - 145 tons/yr
This refinery submitted data in the Organic TC Questionnaire on when
surface impoundment(s) would be cleaned out and closed (or retrofitted) and
the amount of wastes that would be cleaned out. Using this information, the
EPA was able to determine the quantity of F037 and F038 wastes removed form
surface impoundment(s) during the time- periods listed below:
July 1. 1992 - Dec. 31, 1992 - 280 tons
Jan. 1, 1993 - Dec. 31, 1993 - 280 tons
Jan, 1, 1994 - June 30, 1994 - 2S0 tons
-------
P037 AND P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility 52
Data sources available;
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR sur-tv)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery d,*ta base (PP.DB)
No-®igration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and FQ38 waste estimation;
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide aore recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 1,322 tons/yr
-------
Facility # 52
Crude capacity: 133,000 barn-l;i/
-------
The turbulence caused by the aeration coupled with the short residence time in
the DAF unit prevents significant settling; therefore, we examined settling
characteristics in the equaliznt ion basin.
Since most F03? and F038 wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also land dispose F037 and F038 wastes. Because E?A has
not received notification from this refinery identifying land-based units
(e.g., surface impoundments) accepting newly identified TC wastes, EPA assumes
that the surface impoundments have been closed and the functions of the
surface impoundments have been replaced by tanks. EPA believes that tanks
replacing surface impoundments would be cleaned out routinely to remove
accumulated sludges (which are considered routinely generated F037 and F038
vartes). Based on information provided in the TC questionnaire, we estimated
the quantity of wastes generated from the:- routine tank clear.outs to be on an
average one-third as much as wastes generated from cleanout of surface
impoundments. Calculations for surface impoundment cleanout (based on settling
of solids in an impoundment that was cleaned out every five years on the
average) and for tank cleanouts (based on the calculations for surface
impoundment cleanout) are presented below.
Quantity of sludge generated from the surface impoundments that have been
closed:
Equalization basin volume: 4,791,600 cu.ft.2
Flow - 3.ISO,000 galions/dav - 425,166 cu.ft./day
Hydraulic retention time (HRT): 6,791,600 cu.ft. / 425,166 cu.ft./day -
11.27 day - 270.48 hours
Settling calculations show that the HRT is sufficient for complete settling of
solids and removal of oil.
Solids and oil settling in basin: 181.74 tons/yr + 78.753 tons/yr - 260
tons/yr
Drag-out sludge from basins and impoundments contain an average of 65 percent
water13; therefore, the F037 waste volume accumulating in the basin is
estimated at (260 tons/yr)/(l-.65)- 744 tons/yr.
Quantity of sludge generated from tanks:
3.720 tons of surface impoundment sludge x 1/317 - 1,240 ton/yr of tank
sludge.
Amount of F037 sludge from annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinery: (3,029 tons/yr K049 )/ 3,180,000
gallons/day - 0,000953
Sewer clean out amount: 0.000953 x 600 acres lar.d area of
refinery x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for
solids loading of 1.0 calculated from
known refinery) - 82 tons/vr
-------
fettldng Vatar
l»n\ lotto* Dralna^e^
Siom Vatar ""
CIt Mlfc.
'fOMH Condcnc at«~
Q indla Sludge
(Ch. f )
rrt***ry
OAF
Iwp,
Af I
Unit
B * 91 n
HHW
Sio.
Ik,
Separator
Studgt
NHW
Vil.r
HWW
??l
CT
*n
cr
Final
*th
Sanrf
Clvlflv
CT
Fllttr
Final
8lichart«
-4 *
(uPDCS)
Slcp Oil Emulsion
Rtjtc-T^TIR
NllW
' SI 09
Tki.
170-
*»J * 7
on
kihw
SoM
Wastewater Treatment Flow Schematic
iCilti
C*£T
X hi
HW
i-iotsoo
J3.J.M
HW
m
-------
P037 AND P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility il: 53
Data sourer?: available:
Petroleuc refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous V.u^te Treatment, Storage,Disposa
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
_j£ National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardour vasU- data base
x Petroleura refinery data base (PKD3)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed ru 11- .
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation;
EPA used data froa the above sources because the refinery did no
provide rcore recent data.
F037 and F033 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 40 tons/yr
-------
Facility # 53
Crude capacity: 27,460 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 20.000 gallons/day2
K waste generation:
K04H: 4 tons/year2
K0S1: S tons/year2
As?unpt ions:
Facility Croup 24
K049 composition: 40 percent water, 48 percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
we igh;5
K051 composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
we ight5
API separator solids recoval efficiency; 50 percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
DAF unit solids retcoval ef f i • :ency: 50 percent4
DAF unit oil removal efficiency: 85 percent6
Oil in the API skirrjting (to slop oil system): 50 percent'
Slop oil removal sludge (K04?) was not reported in the PRDS; however, a K049
generation rate of 39 tons/yr is estimated based on 1.3S metric tons/yr per
1,000 b/sd of refinery capacity*
Est imat ton'
Solids in the API sludge (KC 5 H; (0,2 x 8 tons/vr) - 1.6 tons/yr
Solids in the API skimxing (recoved as K049): (0.12 x 42 tons/yr) - 5.04
tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 1.6 tons/yr +¦ 5.04 tons/yr - 6.64
cor.s/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (6.64 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids rexoval
eff,) - 13.23 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 13.28 tons/yr • 6.64 tons/yr - 6.64
tons/yr
Quantity of API skimming: (0.52 K049 water h solids content) x 42 tons/yr)
/ (1.0 - 0.5 oil in API skimming) - 43.68
tons/yr
Oil in API skimming: 43.68 tons/yr x 0.5 - 21.84 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0.15 x 8 tons/yr) - 1.2 tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator: 21.84 tons/yr + 1,2 tons/yr - 23.04
tons/yr
il in API influent wastewater; 23.04 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal
eff.) - 30.7 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 30,7 tons/yr - 23.04 tons/yr - 7.66
tons/yr
Solids in DAF float (K048): (6.64 ton/yr) x (0.5 DAF solid removal
efficiency) - 3.32 ton/yr
Oil in DAF float (K04S): (7.66 ton/yr) x (0.85 DAF oil removal
efficiency) - 6.511 ton/yr
-------
Solids in DAF effluent vastevcter: 6.64 tons/yr from API separator - 3.32
ton/yr - 3.32 tons/yr
Oil in DAF effluent wastewater: (7.66 con/yr) x (I - 0.S5 oil removal
efficiency) - 1.149 tons/yr
The turbulence caused by the aeration coupled with the short resider.es tise in
the DAF unit prevents significant settling; therefore, we examined settling
characteristics in the equalization basin.
Since most F037 and F03S wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also land dispose F037 and F038 wastes. Because EPA has
not received notification fror this refinery identifying land-based units
(e.g., surface impoundments; accepting newly identified TC wastes, EPA assur.es
that the surface impoundments have been closed and the functions of the
surface impoundments have beer, replaced by tanks. EPA believes that tanks
replacing surface Impoundments would he cleaned out routinely to rerr.ove
accumulated sludges (which are considered routinely generated F037 and F038
wastes). Based on information provided In the TC questionnaire, wc estimated
the quantity of wastes generated from these routine tank cleanouts :o be on an
average one-third as much as wastes generated from cleanout of surface
impoundments. Calculations fr surface impoundment cleanout (based on settling
of solids in an impoundment ir.st was cleaned out every five years on the
average) and for tank cleanouts (based on the calculations for surface
impoundment cleanout) are presented below.
Quantity of sludge generated from the surface impoundments that have been
closed:
Equalisation basin volume: 523,000 cu.ft.2
Flow - 20,000 gallons/dav - 2,674 cu.ft./day
Hydraulic retention t iite i Hr.T) : 523,000 cu.ft. / 2,674 cu.ft./day - 195.59
day - 4694.16 hours
Settling calculations show that the HRT is sufficient for complete settling of
solids and removal of oil.
Solids and oil settling in basin: 3.32 tons/vr + 1.149 tons/yr - 4 tons/yr
Drag-out sludge from basir.s ar.d impoundments contain an average of 65 percent
water15; therefore, the F02 7 waste volume accumulating in the basin is
estimated at (4 tons/yr)/(i-.63)- 13 tons/yr.
Quantity of sludge generated from tanks:
13 tons of surface impoundment sludge x 1/31? - 4 ton/yr of tank sludge.
mount of F037 sludge fron enr.--Lal refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinery: (4 tons/yr K048 + 42 tons/yr K049 + 8
tons/yr K051)/ 20,000 gallons/day -
0.0027
-------
Sewer clean out amount
0.002? x 92 acres land area of refinery x
143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading
of 1.0 calculated from knoum refinery) -
36 tons/yr
-------
«¦*
hi.
ATI
f£P
/
/
"""' jr ' "
+fosi
V™.
5u>T0n
it
to49
-i| B 3
b*f
bAF
tp4% .
-------
P037 AKD P03S WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AJJD TRACKING SHEET
Facility 54
Data, sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Uarite Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (T5>DR survey)
x National Survey of Harardaur. Waste Generators
Biennial report/state r*por:in£ requirements
California hazardous vastr base
x Petroleum refinery data (PRD8)
Nc-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and FQ38 vaste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
FQ37 and F038 vaste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 365 tons/yr
-------
F037 AKD FOBS WASTK CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA XJSB AKD TRACKING SHEET
Facility !i" 55
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Stor.ire Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities fTSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements ,
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery -lita base (FRDB)
No-migration petitions
Corauents from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 r.nd F038 vaste estimation:
EPA used data froa the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F03? (routine) - 170 tons/yr
-------
F037 AND P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility «: 56
Data sources available:
Petroleua refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous W/istc Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR iairvc=v)
x National Survey of Hazardous W.tMc- Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
__ California hazardous waste base
x Petroleum refinery ,-.ita base (f'RDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed ru]<-
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for FQ37 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide sore recent data.
F03? and F03S vaste estiaates:
FG37 (routine) « 90 tons/yr
-------
Facility # 56
Crude capacity; 55,000 barrrIn/day1
Wastewater flow: 178,000 gallons/day2
Assumptions:
Facility Croup I4 '
K049 composition: 40 percent water, 48 percent oil, and 12 percent solids by-
weight5
K051 composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
API separator solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
API separator oil remos-al efficiency: "5 percent4
DAF unit solids rc rrov.il efficiency: 50 percent6
DAF unit oil removal efficiency: 85 percent4
Oil in the API skimming (to -.lop oil system): 50 percent7
DAF float sludge (K048) was not reported in the PRDB; however, a K048
generation rate of 226 tons/yr is estimated based on 3.60 metric tons/yr per
1,000 b/sd of refinery capacity®
Slop oil removal sludge (K049) was not reported in the PRDB; however, a K049
generation rate of 8? tons/yr is estimated based on 1.38 metric tons/yr per
1,000 b/sd of refinery capacity8
API separator bottom sludge (K051) was not reported in the PRDB; however, a
K051 generation rate of 138 tons/yr is estimated based on 2.20 metric tons/yr
per 1.000 b/sd of refinery capacity4
Est itr.at ion:
Solids in the API sludge (K051): (0,2 x 138 tons/yr) - 27.644 tons/yr
Solids in the API skimming (removed as K049): (0.12 x 87 tons/yr) - 10.3968
tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 27.644 tons/yr + 10.3968 tons/yr -
38.0408 tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (38,0408 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids
removal eff.) - 76.0816 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 76.0816 tons/yr - 38.0408 tons/yr -
38.0408 tons/yr
Quantity of API skimming: (0.52 K049 water & solids content) x 8? tons/yr)
/ (1.0 - 0.5 oil in API skitraing) - 90,1056
tons/yr
C:1 in API skimming: 90.1056 tons/yr x 0.5 - 45.0528 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0.15 x 138 tons/yr) - 20.733 tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator; 45.0528 tons/yr + 20,733 tons/yr - 65.7858
tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: 65.7858 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil remo%-al
eff.) - 87.7 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 87.7 tons/yr - 65.7858 tons/yr - 21,9142
tctis/yr
-------
Solids in DAF float (KCK.8); (38.0408 ton/yr) x (0,3 DAF solid removal
efficiency) - 19.0204 ton/yr
Oil in DAF float (K048): (21.9142 ton/yr) x (0.85 DAF oil removal
efficiency) - 18.62707 ton/yr
Solids in DAF effluent wastewater: 38.0408 tons/yr from API separator -
19.0204 ton/yr *» 19,0204 tons/yr
Oil in DAF effluent wastewater: (21,9142 ton/yr) x (1 ¦ 0.85 oil removal
efficiency) - 3-28713 tons/yr
The turbulence caused by the aeration coupled with the short residence time in
the DAF unit prevents significant settling; therefore, we examined settling
characteristics in the equalization basin.
Since roost F037 and F038 wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also land dispose F02 7 and F038 wastes. Because EPA has
not received notification froa this refinery identifying land-based units
(e.g., surface impoundments) accepting newly identified TC wastes, EPA assumes
that the surface impoundments have been closed and the functions of the
surface impoundments have been replaced by tanks. EPA believes that tanks
replacing surface impoundments would be cleaned out routinely to remove
accumulated sludges (which ar-.> considered routinely generated F037 and F038
wastes). Based on inforrcaticr. provided in the TC questionnaire, ve estimated
the quantity of wastes generated from these routine tank cleanouts to be on an
average one-third as much as wastes generated from cleanout of surface
impoundments. Calculations for surface impoundment cleanout (based on settling
of solids in an impoundment that was cleaned out every five years on the
average) and for tank clear.outs (based on the calculations for surface
impoundment cleanout) are presented below.
Quantity of sludge generated from the surface impoundments that have- been
closed:
Equalization basin volume: 601,000 cu.ft.2
Flow - 178.000 gallons/dav - 23,799 cu.ft./day
hydraulic retention time (KRT): 601,000 cu.ft. / 23,799 cu.ft./day - 25.25
day - 608.00 hours
Settling calculations show that the HRT is sufficient for complete settling of
solids and removal of oil.
Solids and oil settling in basin: 19.0204 tons/yr + 3.28713 tons/yr - 22
tons/yr
Drag-out sludge from basir.s and impoundments contain an average of 65 percent
water13; therefore, the F017 waste volume accumulating in the basin is
estimated at (22 tons/yr)/'!-.65)- 64 tons/yr.
Quantity of sludge generated from tanks:
64 tons of surface impoundment sludge x 1 /317 - 21 ton/yr of tank sludge.
Amount of F037 sludge f roc: annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean cut quantities):15
-------
Solids loading of refinery
Sever clean out amount:
(226 tons/yr K048 + 87 tons/yr K049 + 128
tons/yr K051)/ 178,000 gallons/dav -
0.002534
0.002534 x 190 acres land area of
refinery x 143.7 tons/Cyr/acre) (for
solids loading of 1.0 calculated from
known refinery) - 69 tons/yr
-------
IP
s/\
A-
-------
P03? AKD F238 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AKD TRACKING SHEET
Facility 57
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste 7 :-f-atrrent, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous vaste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Consments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
FD37 and F038 vaste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 3 tons/vr
-------
Facility # 5?
Crude capacity; 80,000 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 105,000 gallor,r./d«y^
K waste generation:
KCA3: 12 tons/year3
K051: IS tons/year3
Assumptions:
Facility Group {**•
Estimation:
Amount of F037 sludge frcs annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based 6n refineries with known scwr-r clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of ref ir.erv: ( 12 tons/yr K048 + 15 tons/vr K051)/
105,000 gallons/day - 0,000257
Sewer clean out saouur: 0.000257 x 70 acres land area of refinery
x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading
of 1.0 calculated from known refinery) - 3
tons/yr
-------
F037 AND F038 WASTK CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AITO TRACKING SHEET
Facility p: 33
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Vn r, t •: Treatment r Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities CTSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Unste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste da? n base
x Petroleum refinery data bAM- (PRDB)
No-aigration petitions
CotLTents frora the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 vaste estimation:
EPA used data frora the above cources because the refinery did not
provide naore recent data.
F037 and F038 vaite estimates:
F037 (routine) - 85 tor.s/yr
-------
Facility 58
Crude capacity: 220,000 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 14,360,000 gallons/day2
K waste generation:
K051: 347 tons/year3
Assumptions:
Facility Croup 34
K051 composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
API separator solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
Estimation:
Solids in the AFI sludge (K051): (0.2 x 34? tons/yr) - 69.4 tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (69.4 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids removal
eff.) - 138,8 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 138.8 tons/yr - 69,4 tons/yr - 69.4
tons/yr
Oil iti API sludge (K051): (0.15 x 347 tons/yr) - 52.05 tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: (52.05 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal
eff.) - 69.4 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 69.4 tons/yr - 52.05 tons/yr - 17.35
tons/yr
Since most F037 and F038 wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also land dispose F037 and F03S wastes. Because EPA has
not received notification ftoo this refinery identifying land-based units
(e.g., surface impoundments) accepting newly identified TC wastes, EPA assumes
that the surface impoundments have been closed and the functions of the
surface impoundments have been replaced by tanks. EPA believes that tanks
replacing surface impoundments would be cleaned cut routinely to remove
accumulated sludges (which are considered routinely generated F037 and F038
wastes). Based on information provided in the TC questionnaire, we estimated
the quantify of wastes generated from these routine tank cleanouts to be on an
average one-third as such as wastes generated from cleanout of surface
impoundments. Calculations for surface impoundment cleanout (based on settling
of solids in an impoundment that was cleaned out every five years on the
average) and for tank cleanouts (based on the calculations for surface
impoundment cleanout) are presented below.
Equalisation basin volume: 22.842,000 cu.ft.2
Flow - 14,360,000 gallons/day - 1,919,932 cu.ft./day
Hydraulic retention time (KRT): 22,842,000 cu.ft. / 1,919,932 cu.ft./day
- 11.9 day - 286 hours
Settling calculations show that the HRT is sufficient for cocplete settling of
solids and removal of oil.
-------
Solids and oil settling in basin: 69,4 tons/yr + 17.35 tons/yr - 86.73
tons/yr
Drag-out sludge from basins and impoundments contain an average of 63 percent
water1'; therefore, the F037 waste voliune accumulating in the basin is
estimated at (86.75 tor.s/yr)/(1 - .65)- 247,9 eons/yr.
Quantity of sludge generated from tanks;
247.9 tons of surface i=poundcent sludge x 1/317 - 82.4 ton/yr of tank sludge.
Ajr.ount of F037 sludge fron annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean nut quantities);15
Solids loading of refinery: (347 tons/yr K051)/ 14,360,000
gallons/day - 0.000024
Sewer clean out aiount: 0.000024 x 725 acres land area of
refinery x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for
solids loading of 1.0 calculated from
known refinery) - 2.5 tons/yr
-------
F037 AKD PQ38 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AKD TRACKING SHEET
Faci 1 i ty H : 59
Data sources available:
Petroleum ref ir.erv visits/voluntary submission
:< National Survey cf Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage. Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/stare reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery .ta base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F03S waste estimation:
EPA used data froc the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data,
F037 and F038 waste esticatc-s:
F03? (routine) - 6 tons/yr
-------
Facility * 59
Crude capacity: Sot reported %
Wastewater flow: 120,000 gallons/day2
Assuspt ions:
Facility Group 26
Estitrat ion:
Ansount of F037 sludge from annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries vith known sewer clean out quantities):'5
Solids loading of refinery: (63 tons/yr K048 + 24 tons/yr K049 + 6
Cons/yr K051)/ 120,000 gallons/day -
0.000775
Sewer clean out ancur.t; O.OGQ775 x 3} acres land area of refinery
x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading
of 1.0 calculated from known refinery) - 6
tons/yr
-------
4
An -
~Tkp?i
W -
^ KM2
C*L
-------
P03? AKD F038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA OSE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility «: 60
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Was r <¦ Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x fetroleura refinery data base (PRDB)
No-rcigration petitions
Conunents from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F03S vaste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide raore recent data.
P03? and F028 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 569 tons/yr
-------
Facility # 60
Crudt capacity: 62,000 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 1,500,000 gallons/day2
Assuitpt ions:
Facility Group 24
Estimation:
Arcout.t of F037 sludge from annual refinery sever clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities);15
Solids loading of refinery: (4,173 tons/yr K048 + 94 tons/yr K049 +
25,055 tons/yr K051)/ 1,500,000
gallons/day - 0,019548
Sewer clean out aaour.t: 0.019548 x 202 acres land area of
refinery x 1-K7 cons/(yr/acre) (for
solids loading of 1.0 calculated from
known refinery) - 567 tons/yr
-------
F037 AND FG38 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility 61
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous U.iste Treatment, Storage. Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x PetroleuD refiner; d.-ita base (PRDB)
Mo-raigration petitions
Conunents from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Sasis for FQ37 and F03S vaste estimation:
EPA used data froni the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and FQ38 vaste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 6 tons/yr
-------
P037 AND P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility 62
Data sources available:
Petroleua refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Stora; .Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survi-vj
x National Survey of Hazardous Vaste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous vaste data bnr.e
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB5
No-soigratlon petitions
Comments froa the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F03S vaste estiaation:
EPA used data froa the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 vaste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 113 toas/yr
-------
Facility # 62
Crude capacity: 46,500 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 130,000 gallons/day2
K waste generation:
K051: 113 tons/year2
Assunot ions:
Facility Group I6
K049 composition: 40 percent water, 48 pc:rc<-i,t oil, and 12 percent solids bv
weight5
K051 composition: 65 percent water, IS percent oil, and 20 percent solids bv
weight5
API separator solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
Oil in the API skimming (to slop oil system): 50 percent7
Slop oil emulsion solids (KG-?) was not reported in TSDR survey or PRDB:
therefore, an estimated K049 quantity of 68 tons/yr was based on 1.38 metric
tons/yr (or 1.52 tons/yr) per 1,000 barrels/day8
CPI sludge generation is ccinical
Estimation:
Solids in the API sludge (K051): (0.2 x 113 tons/yr) - 22.6 tons/yr
Solids in the API skimming (renoved as K049): (0.12 x 68 tons/yr) - 8.16
tons/yr
Solids rercoved in the API separator: 22.6 tons/yr + 8.16 tons/yr - 30.76
tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (30,76 tons/yr) / (0,5 API solids removal
eff.) - 61.52 tons/yr
Solids in API affluent wastewater: 61.52 tons/yr ¦ 30.76 tons/yr - 30.76
tons/yr
Quantity of API skimming: (0.52 K049 water & solids content) x 68 tons/yr)
/ (1.0 - 0.5 oil in API skimming) - 70.72
tons/yr
Oil in API skimming: 70.72 tons/yr x 0.5 - 35.36 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0,15 x 113 tons/yr) - 16.95 tons/yr
Oil renoved in the API separator: 35.36 tons/yr + 16.95 tons/yr - 52.31
tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: 52.31 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal
eff.) - 69.7 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 69.7 tons/yr - 52.31 tons/yr - 17.39
tons/yr
Since rcost F037 and FC38 wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also land dispose F037 and F038 wastes. Because EPA has
not received notification f ros this refinery identifying land-based units
(e.g., surface impoundments) accepting newly identified TC wastes, EPA assumes
that the surface impoundments have been closed and the functions of the
-------
surface impoundments have been replaced by tanks. EPA believes chat tanks
replacing surface impoundments would be cleaned out routinely to remove
accumulated sludges (which are considered routinely generated F037 and F02S
wastes). Based on information provided in the TC questionnaire, ve estimated
the quantity of wastes generated fros these routine tank cleanouts to be or. an
average cne-third as much as wastes generated from cleanout of surface
impoundments. Calculations for surface impoundment cleanout (based or. settling
of solids in an impoundment that was cleaned out every five years on the
average) and for tank cleanouts 'based on the calculations for surface
impoundment cleanout) are presented below.
Quantity of sludge generated frorc the surface impoundments that have been
closed:
The turbulence caused by the aeration coupled with the short res i dc-n.ee time in
the API unit prevents significant settling: therefore, we examined settling
characteristics in the equalization basin.
Equalization basin volume: -"*7,000 cu ft.*
Flow - 130,000 gallons/day - 1";H1 cu.ft /day
Hydraulic retention time (HRT): 697,000 cu.ft. / 17381 cu.ft./day - uQ day
- 962 hours
Settling calculations show that the HRT is sufficient for complete settling of
solids and removal of oil.
Solids and oil settling in basin: 17.39 tons/yr + 30.76 tor.s/yr - 4S.2
tons/yr
Drag-out sludge from basins contain an average of 63 percent water13:
therefore, the F037 waste volume accumulating in the basin is estimated at
(48,2 tons/yr)/(1-.65)- 137.6 tons/yr.
Amount of F waste sludge from upstream FEP:
1742 sq.ft area of the surface' impoundment x 2 ft depth of the sludge14
x 63 Ib/cu.ft density of the sludge- 3484 lbs - 110 tons
Quantity of sludge generated from tanks:
248 tons of surface impoundment sludge x 1/317 - 83 ton/yr of tank sludge.
Amount of F037 sludge from annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinerv: (68 tons/yr K049 + 113 tons/yr K051)/
130,000 gallons/day - 0.001392
Sewer clean out amount: 0.001392 x 150 acres land area of
refinery x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for
solids loading of 1.0 calculated from
kr.:.vr; refinery) - 30 tons/yr
-------
Tzoc&z
'-If—
1U eeo^U
FGP
i An
'tcfi
6io?
Oil
TkMj
2
3,-Wcv«wj^,
FBP
}
^?63'1
FEP
'F621
;'-
1
CPI
4
tofi»7
_hi6^MQie
-------
F037 AND F03B WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS;
DATA USZ AND TRACKING SHEET
Facilitv t>; 63
Data sources available:
Fetroleuni refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Harard-us Waste Trt.-.tirent. Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (ISO?, survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous vast 6 data base
x Petroleum refinery da:=» base (PRDE)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
3asis for FQ37 and F033 waste estigation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
FQ37 and F038 v&ste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 175 tor.s/vr
F038 (routine) - 5 tons/yr
-------
F037 sludge from splitter clean out;
(16.7 tons/yr solids settling In
splitter) / (0,20 fraction of solids
in splitter sludge12) - S4 tons/yr
F037 sludge from splitter clean out
Oil removal in CP! (F037);
Solids removal in CP1 (F037):
(6 tons/yr oil in influent wastewater) x
(0.85 CPI oil removal efficiency) - 3
tons/yr
(25 tons/yr solids in influent wastewater)
x (0.7 CPI solids removal efficiency ) -
17 tons/yr
F037 sludge from CPI clean cut
(5 tons/yr solids settling in CPI + 17
tons/vr oil settling in CPI) / (0.35
fraction of solids and oil in CPI sludge5)
- 65 tons/yr F03 7 sludge from CPI clean
out
Oil in CPI effluent wastewater:
Solids in CPI effluent wasv -.iter:
Solids removal in FET (F037):
(6 tons/yr oil in influent wastewater - 5
tons/yr oil reiroved by CPI) - 1 tons/yr
oil in effluent wastewater
(25 tons/yr solids in influent wastewater
- 17 tons/yr solids removed by CFI) - 7.5
tons/yr solids in effluent wastewater
(7.5 tons/yr solids in influent
wastewater) x <0.5 FET solids removal
efficiency) - 4 tons/yr solids settling in
FET
F037 sludge from FET clean out:
Solids in FET effluent wastewater:
(4 tons/yr solids settling in FET) / (0.2
fraction of solids in FET sludge10) - 19
tons/yr F037 sludge from FET clean out
(7.5 tons/yr solids in influent wastewater
- 4 tons/yr solids settling in FET) - 3.5
tons/yr. solids in effluent wastewater
Solids rerr.oval in pH ADJ. TANK (F038):
F03S sludge from pH ADJ. TANK clean out:
(3.5 tons/yr solids in influent
wastewater) x (0.25 pH ADJ. TANK
solids removal efficiency) - 1
tons/yr
(1 tons/yr solids settling in pH
ADJ. TANK) / (0.2 fraction of solids
in pH ADJ. TANK sludge12) - 5
tons/yr F038 sludge from pH ADJ.
TANK clean out
Solids in pH ADJ. TANK effluent wastewater: (3.5 tons/yr solids in
influent wastewater - 1
tons/yr solids settling in pH
ADJ. TANK) - 2.5 tons/yr
solids in effluent wastewater
-------
Amount of F03? sludge from annua 1 refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sever clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinerv; (124 tons/yr K051)/ 600,000 gallons/da
0.000207
Sewer clean out auount; 0,010207 y, 225 acres land area of
refinery x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for
solids loading of 1.0 calculated front
known refinery) - 6.69 tons/yr
-------
OMS No., 250-0070
Expines Jun« 1988
F.PA ^National Survey of Hazardous Waste
Treatment, Storage, Disposal, and
^ Recycling Facilities
GENERAL FACILITY^
INFORMATION a®
. jEMTIAL
, >r
_ «,„•.»> i;.j ;;AT:0ilAL
:icUR^lfoRMATi0N
This questionnaire applies only
to the facility listed on this
label. Refer to this label as
instructed In the questionnaire.
-------
-Xl=
SCHEMATIC FLOW DIAGRAM
ADVANCED WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM
2
©
W
S ¦ I CO I
• • 1.1.
; r.o
:z>
proS
S5 WATB\
HYDRAULIC
sputter
BOX
PROCESS AREA STORM t
* OELUQE WATER
COOUNQ TOWER BLOWDOWM
$
Ihi
z
u
Q
E
z
©
u
ARTHUR Kli <
r
STORM AND DELUGE WATER BYPASS
RECUUMED CM.
API
Oft/WATtR
SEPARATOR
n r
WET OAS SCRUBBER BLOWOOWN
EQUALIZATION
backwash
T T
TANK
PLATE
OC/WATER
SEPARATOR
air y
OCT SLUDGE
LANDFARM
CAUSTIC
ACIO
NUTRIENT
SUPERNATANT
PLATE
OIL/WATER
1-
SEPARATOR
LL
CLEAN PLANT
STORM WATER
SLUDGE TO REUSE „ ,T,
OR OFF-SITE DISPOSAL
~ INTERNAL WATER REUSE
MOLDING AND
DECANTING
TAf*
LANDFARM
CLOSED PIPE
T
CLEAN EFRUfNl
AIR
ACTIVATED
SLUDGE
PIO-SIUDGE
CLAWF1ER
u
SURGE
FILTER
SURGE
ACTIVATED
CARBON
4
COMPOSITE SAMPLING
-------
FQ37 AND P03 8 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility 64
Data sources available:
Petroleuxc refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage,Disposal.
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery i.itn hn«;c- (PROS)
No-rrigration petitions
Comments front the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 vaste estimation:
£PA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
FQ3? and F03S vaste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 479 tor.s/yr
F03S (routine) - 31 tons/yr
-------
Facility # 64
Crude capacity: 21,500 barreis/day1
Wastewater flow: 130,000 gallons/day*
K waste generation:
KQiS: 11' tons/year3
K051; 73£ tons/year3
Assuir.pt ions:
Facility Group 64
K051 composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent
oil
, and 20 percent
weight5
API separator solids removal efficiency;
50
percent6
APT separator oil removal efficiency:
75
percent6
Oil in the API skimming (to slop oil system):
50
percent7
Equalization pond solid reeoval efficiency:
50
percent6
Flocculaticn pit solid removal efficiency:
25
percent"'1
DAF oil removal efficiency:
85
percent6
DAF solid rercoval efficiency:
50
percent4
Estimation:
Solids in the API sludge (K051); (0.2 x 738 tor.s/yr) - 147.6 tons yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: {147.6 tons/vr) / (0.5 API solids removal
ۥ f f. ) - 295.2 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 295.2 tons/yr - 147.6 tons/yr - 147.6
tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051); <0.15 x 738 tons/yr) - 110.7 tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater' 110,7 tons/yr) / (0,75 API oil removal
eff.) - 147.6 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 147,6 tons/yr - 110.7 tons/yr - 36.9
tons/yr
Since m< -'t F037 and F038 wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also land dispone F037 and F038 wastes. Because EPA has
not received notification fros this refinery identifying land-based units
{e.g., surface impoundments) accepting newly identified TC wastes, EPA assumes
that the surface impoundments have been closed and the functions of the
surface impoundments have beer, replaced by tanks. EPA believes that tanks
replacing surface intpoundxeents would be cleaned out routinely to remove
accumulated sludges (which are considered routinely generated F037 and F038
wastes). Eased on information provided in the TC questionnaire, we estimated
the quantity of wastes generated frorc these routine tank cleanouts to be on an
average one-third as much as wastes generated frcs cleanout of surface
impoundments. Calculations for surface impoundment cleanout (based on settling
of solids in an impoundment that was cleaned out every five years on the
average) and for tank cleanouts (based on the calculations for surface
impoundment cleanout) are presented below.
Quantity of sludge generated fro.T thr surface impoundments that have been
closed:
-------
Solids removal in equalization pond (F037): (147.6 tons/yr solids in
influent wastewater) x (0.3
equalization pond solids
removal efficiency) - 74
tons/yr solids settling in
equalization pond
F03? sludge from equalisation pond clean out: (74 tons/yr solids settling in
equalization pond) / (0,2
fraction of solids in
equalization pond sludge13) -
370 tons/yr F037 sludge from
equalization pond clean out
Solids in equalization pond effluent wastewater: (147.6 tons/yr solids in
influent wastewater - 74
tons/yr solids settling
in equalization pond) -
74 tons/yr solids in
effluent wastewater
Solids renoval in floculation ( 74 tons/yr solids in influent
wastwaster) x (.25 solids removal
effieciency) - 18.5 tons/yr
F038 sludge from floculation pit cleanout: ( IS,5 tons/yr) / (0.2
fraction of solids in
floculation pit 12) - 93
Solids in floculation pit effluent wastewater: 74tons/yr solids in influent
wastewater - 18.5 tons/yr solids removed)
55.5 tons/yr
Oil in DAF float (K04S): (36.9 tons/yr) x (0.85 DAF oil removal
efficiency) - 31 tons/yr
Solid in DAF float (KC~*8): (55.5 tons/yr) x (0.5 removal efficiency) - 27.5
tons/ yr
Oil in DAF effluent wastewater: (36,9 tons/yr) - (31 oil removed by DAF
float - 6 tons/yr
Solids in DAF effluent wastewater: (55.5 tons/yr influent solids) - 27.5
tons/yr removed by DAF float - 27,5
tons/yr
The turbulence caused by the aeration coupled with the short residence time in
the DAF unit prevents significant settling; therefore, we examined settling
characteristics in the equalization basin.
Equalization basin volume: 4.025,000 cu.ft.2
Flow - 130,000 gallons/day - 17.329 cu.ft./day
Hydraulic retention c iire (KRT): 4025,000 cu.ft. / 17,329 cu.ft./day - 232
day - 5574 hours
-------
Settling calculations show chat tiie MET fr. sufficient for complete settling of
solids and removal of oil.
Solids and oil settling in basin' 6 tons/yr + 27.5 tons/yr - 33-5 tons/vr
Drag-out sludge from basins and impoundments contain an average of 65 percent
water13; therefore, the F037 waste voluiu- .accumulating in the basin is
estimated at (33.5 tor.s/y-r}/i 1 • .65)- 'if, tons/yr.
Quantify of sludge generated from tanks:
948 tons of surface impoundment sludge x 1/317 - 316 ton/vr of tank sludge.
Amount of F037 sludge froc annual rtf int-ry sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer rli-nti out quantities):15
Solids loading of refir.erv: ( 737 tons/yr K048 + 0 tons/vr K049 + 738
tons/yr K051)/ 130,000 gallons/day -
O.OllJM
Sever clean out arcount: 0.011346 x 1C0 acres land area of
refinery x 143.7 tons/(yr/scre) (for
soj I(!•¦ loading of 1.0 calculated froa
known refinery) - 163 tons/yr
-------
F03? AHD F03B WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility if: 65
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage,
Disposal, and Reycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requi recents
' California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleua refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Oiganic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
piwvide sore recent data,
FQ37 and FQ38 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 7 tons/yr
-------
Facility * 65
Crude capacity; 14,000 barrels/dav'
'wastewater flow: 36,000 gallons/day*
K waste generation:
K051: 12 tons/ve3r5
Assertions:
Facility Group 4'
K051 composition: 65 percent vater, 15 pen
weight5
API separator solids removal efficiency:
API separator oil reraoval efficiency:
FET solid removal efficiency:
Estimation:.
Solids in the API sludge (K(0.2 x 12 tons/yr) - 2.4 tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (2.4 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids removal
eif.) - 4.S cons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 4. S tons/yr - 2.4 tons/yr - 2.4 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051) : (0.15 x 12 tons/yr) - 1.8 tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: 1.8 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal eff.)
-2.4 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 2,4 tons/yr - 1,8 tons/yr - 0.6 cons/yr
•list oil, and 20 percent solids bv
50 percent6
75 percent6
50 percent®
(2.4 tons/yr solids in influent
wastewater) x (0.5 FET solids removal
efficiency) - 1.2 tons/yr solids settling
in FET
(1.2 tons/yr solids settling in FET) /
(0,2 fraction of solids in FET sludge10) -
6 tons/yr FOB? sludge from FET clean out
(2.4 tons/yr solids in influent wastewater
• 1.2 tons/yr solids settling in FET) -
1.2 tons/yr solids in effluent wastewater
Amount of F037 sludge froc annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinery: (12 tons/yr K051)/ 36,000 gallons/day -
0.000333
Sewer clean out amount: 0.000333 x 28 acres land area of refinery
x 143,7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading
of 1.0 calculated from known refinery) -
1.34 tons/yr
Solids removal ir, FET (F037):
F0 37 sludge from FET clean out:
Solids in FET effluent wastewater:
-------
wVETb-, " KjTr-
fit,. \
V-U'a, Va^OT. (V\g.T. POCt'iK*
HW
Sit.n" Cavj>-t>c "
KTs*«iuo>' Of=
UP6, Uapmua, vcEsxi&'-'C
SA
*Spg*jt'
<^A\/vr»c-.
Acc"i>\.
HW
I
tsooi ("Spr-kfl' ^aus-T'c.
S.6"T
Off-iiTE "Kj A'P^ovCJ) X* i
NHW
Pr«;C.Ci H/ATT-g*,',
Deserts. BOikjE.
Cbl' W*vV waTEgS- (^>H *mo)
(.C^ OlVH PROCtW AND
lAltC, i"TOIllv\ UJOTi.
S\VJT
NHW
ScftOR'SToE
woes iV-twi-
-*»- WAs-TCWAtr-tL Tcrar mWr (siwfi
KOS1 (API Sep. 5UD4t - scot Off- t.Tt to At^oue-s
-------
P037 AND PQ38 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Data sources available;
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
k National Survey of Hazardous War re Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous vastc data base
x Pecroleua refinery data btitu- (PRDB)
N'o-migration petitions
Corrjr.er.ts from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for P037 and F038 vaste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F03? and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 12 tons/yr
-------
Facility ft 66
Crude capacity: 7,000 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 140,000 gallons/day2
K waste generation:
K048: 1 tons/year2
K051: 0,2 tons/year2
Assumptions:
Facility Group 44
K049 composition: 40 percent water, 48 percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
weight5
K05I composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
API separator solids removal efficiency: 30 percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
Oil in the API skimming (to slop oil system): 50 percent7
FET solid removal efficiency: 50 percent9
DAF oil removal efficiency: 85 percent6
DAF solid removal efficiency: 50 percent6
Slop oil emulsion solids (K049) was not reported in TSDR survev or PRD3:
therefore, an estimated K049 quantity of 10 tons/vr was based on 1,38 metric
to.»s/yr (or 1.52 tons/yr) per 1,000 barrels/day*
Estimation:
Solids in the AF1 sludge
-------
Solids removal in FET (F037);
F037 sludge frora FET clean out:
4.96 tons/yr solids in influent wastewater
- 2.48 solids in FET effluent wastewater -
2.48 tons/yr solids settling in FET
(2.48 tons/yr solids settling in FET) /
(0.2 fraction of solids in FET sludge10) -
12.4 tons/yr F03? sludge from FET clean
out
Cil in DAF float (K048):
Solid in DAF float (KG4S):
(1.77 tons/yr) x (0.35 DAF oil removal
efficiency) - 1.3 tons/yr
(1.24 tons/yr) x (0.5 removal efficiency)
0,62 tons/ yr
Oil in DAF effluent wastewater: (1.77 tons/yr) - (1.5 oil removed by DAF
float - 0.27 tons/yr
Solids in DAF effluent wastewater: (1.24 tons/yr influent solids) - 0.62
Cons/yr renoved by DAF float - 0.62
tons/yr
Amount of F037 sludge fro-e annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewr-r clear, out quantities);15
Solids loading of refinery: (1 cons/vr K048 +¦ 10 tons/yr K04 9)/
140,000 gallons/day - 0.00008
Sewer clean out acount; 0.00008 x 22 acres land area of refinery
x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading
of 1.0 calculated from known refinery.) -
0.25 tons/yr
-------
F£t
^ f&37
vU)r
waste
-------
F037 AND P03S WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility : 67
Para sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous UV, r* t- Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/stato reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
>: Petroleum refinery data bate? (PRDB)
No-raigration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F033 waste est irr./>r I :
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F03? and F03S waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 132 tons/yr
-------
Facility # 67
Crude capacity: 39.000 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 270,000 gallons/dav*
Assumptions:
Facility Group 44
K049 composition: 40 percent water. 48 percent
ve ight5
K051 composition: 65 percent water, 1j percent
weight5
API separator solids removal efficiency:
API separator oil removal efficiency:
Oil in the API skimming (to slop oil r.ystem):
FET solid removal efficiency:
DAF oil recoval efficiency:
DAF solid reioval efficiency:
oil. and 12 percent solids by
oil, and 20 percent solids bv
50 percent6
75 percent6
50 percent'
50 percent*
S5 percent6
30 percent6
DAF float (K048) was not reported in TSDR Survey or PRD3; therefore, an
estimated K04S quantity of 190 tons/yr was based on 3,6 metric tor.s/yr (or
3.9? tons/yr) per 1,000 barrels/day8.
Slop oil eculsion solids (KO-9) van not reported in TSDR survey or FRD3;
therefore, an estimated K049 quantity of 73 tons/yr was based on 1.3S metric
tons/yr (or 1.52 tons/yr) per 1,000 barrels/day*
API sludge (K051) was not reported its TSDR Survev or PRDB;"therefore. an
estimated K051 quantity of 116 tons/yr was based on 2.2 metric tons/yr (or
2.43 tons/yr) per 1,000 barrels/day8.
Estimation:
Solids in the API sludge (K051): (0,2 x 116 tons/yr) - 23.2 tons/yr
Solids in the API skimming (removed as K049): (0,12 x 73 tons/yr) - 8.76
tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 23.2 tons/yr + 8.76 tons/yr - 31.96
tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (31,96 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids removal
eff.) - 63,92 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 63.92 tons/yr - 31,96 tons/yr - 31.96
tons/yr
Quantity of API skimming: (0.52 K049 water •& solids content) x 73 tons/yr)
/ (1.0 • 0.5 oil in API skimming) - 75.92
tons/yr
Oil in API skimming: 75.92 tons/yr x 0.5 - 37.96 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0.IS x 116 tons/yr) - 17.4 tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator: 57,96 tons/yr + 17.4 tons/vr - 55.36
tons/vr
Oil in API influent wastewater: *>5.36 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal
-•ff.) - 73.3 tons/yr
-------
Oil in API effluent wastewater
73.8 tons/yr - 55.36 tons/yr - 18.44
tons/yr
Solids removal in FET (FG37^
F037 sludge from FET clean out;
Sol ids in FET effluent vastev.it r r :
Oil in DAF float (K04S):
Solid in DAF float (K04S) :
{32 tons/yr solids in influent wastewater)
x (0,5 FET solids removal efficiency) - 16
tons/yr solids settling in FET
(16 tons/yr solids settling in FET) / (0.2
fraction of solids in FET sludge13) - 80
tons/yr F037 sludge from FET clean out
(32 tor.s/yr solids in influent wastewater
• 16 tons/yr solids settling in FET) - 16
tons/yr solids in effluent wastewater
(IS tons/yr) x (0,85 DAF oil removal efficiency)
- 15 tons/yr
(16 tons/yr) x (0.5 removal efficiency) - 8
r onn / %'r
Oil in DAF effluent wastewater:
Solids in DAF effluent wastewater:
Solids removal in FET (F037):
F037 sludge from FET clean out.
(18 tons/yr) - (15 oil removed by DAF
float - 3 tons/yr
(16 tons/yr influent solids) * 8 tons/yr
removed by DAF float - 8 tons/yr
(8 tons/yr solids in influent waste-water)
x (0.5 FET solids removal efficiency) - 4
tons/yr solids settling in FET
(4 tons/yr solids settling in FET) / (0.2
fraction of solids in FET sludge10) - 20
tons/yr F037 sludge from FET clean out
Solids in FET effluent wastewater: (8 tons/yr solids in influent wastewater
4 tons/yr solids settling in FET) - 4
tons/yr solids in effluent wastewater
Ar&ount of F037 sludge from annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with kr.ovn .sewer clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinery:
(190 tons/yr K048 + 73 tons/yr K049 + 116
tons/yr K051)/ 270,000 gallons/day -
0.001404
Sewer clean out 'amount:
0.001404 x 160 acres land area of
refinery x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for
solids loading of 1.0 calculated from
known refinery) - 32.2 tons/yr
-------
KotS
4fr
F€T
hil
bAF
F€"T
b«H
KP*&
FCS1
-------
P037 AND F038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility »: 68
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Vante Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities iTSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
___ California hazardous vante data base
x Petroleum refinery data b*sc (PROS)
No-migration petitions
Comrents from the prcpor-c-d rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for P037 and F038 vaste esr irr.nt i on:
EPA used data froi the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data
F037 and F03S waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 22 tor.s/vr
F038 (routine) - 40 tor.s/vr
-------
Facility # 68
Crude capacity: 18,300 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 40,000 gal lor.s/day*
K waste generation:
K051: 5 tons/year2
Assumpt ions:
Facility Group 4 4
K049 composition: AO percent water. 48 percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
weight5
K051 composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
we ight5
API separator solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
Oil in the API skimming Co slop oil tern) : 50 percent7
PET solid removal efficiency: 50 percent9
IAF solid removal efficiency; 50 percent6
Slop oil emulsion solids (K049) was not reported in TSDR survey or FROE;
therefore, an estimated K049 quant i t v of 33 tens/yr was based on 1 28 metric
tons/yr (or 1.52 tons/vr) per 1.000 Imrrels/day®
Estimation:
Solids in the API sludge (KC51): (0.2 x 5 tons/yr) - 1 tons/yr
Solids in the API skirrjxing (removed ,~i;, K049); (0.12 x 33 tons/yr) - 3.96
tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 1 tcr.s/yr + 3.96 tons/yr - 4.96
tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (4.96 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids removal
off.) - 9.92 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 9.92 tons/vr - 4.96 tons/yr - 4.96 tons/yr
Quantity of API skimming; (0.52 K04 9 water & solids content) x 33 tons/yr)
/ (1.0 - 0.5 oil in API skimming) - 34.32
tons/yr
Oil in API skimming: 34.32 tons/yr x 0,5 « 17.16 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0.15 x 5 tons/yr) - 0.75 tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator: 17.16 tons/yr + 0.75 tons/yr - 17.91
tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: 17.91 tons/yr) / (0,75 API oil removal
eff.) - 23.9 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: *23.9 tons/yr - 17,91 tons/yr - 5.99
tons/yr
Solids removal in FET (F037); (5 tons/yr solids in influent wastewater)
x (0.5 FET solids removal efficiency) -
2.5 tons/yr solids settling in FET
-------
F037 sludge from FET clean out
Solids in FET effluent wastewater:
Oil in IAF float (F038):
Solid in IAF float (F03S):
F038 sludge from IAF clean ou
(2.5 tons/yr solids settling in FET) /
(0.2 fraction of solids in FET sludge10) -
12.5 tons/yr F037 sludge from FET clean
out
{5 tons/yr solids in influent wastewater -
2.5 tons/yr solids settling in FET) - 2.5
tons/yr solids in effluent wastewater
(6 tons/vr) x (0.S5 IAF oil removal efficiency)
-5,1 tons/yr
(2.5 tons/yr) s: (0.5 removal efficiency) - 1.3
tons/ yr
t: (5.1 tons/yr solids settling'in IAF) /
(0.13 fraction of solids in IAF sludge5) -
40 tons/yr F038 sludge from IAF clean out
Oil in IAF effluent wastewater: (6 tons/yr) - (5.1 oil removed by IAF
float - 0.9 tons/yr
Solids in IAF effluent wastewater: (2.5 tons/yr influent solids) - 1.3
tons/yr removed by IAF float - 1.2 tons/yr
Amount of F037 sludge from annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinery: (33 tons/yr K049 + 5 tons/yr K051)/
40,000 gallons/day - 0.00095
Sewer clean out amount: 0.00095 x 73 acres land area of refinery
x 143.7 tor.s/(vr/acre) (for solids loading
of 1.0 calculated from known refinery) -
9.9 7 tons/yr
-------
Ikoczc,5
Aft
41 fort
2**
FfT
4t
WF
"fecWJN^
FltTER.
FOSfi
fc>OtOM5TR£AH
>
Units
-------
F037 AND PO30 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility >i: 69
Data sources available:
Petroleurs refinery vtsits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste- Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
snd Recycling Faci lit U-.s (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial reporc/sr&te reporting requirements
California hazardous v:\stv data bast
x Petroleum refiner-- base (PRDB)
N'o-rrigraticn petitions
Comments from the propoM-d rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F033 vaste t-M irca11 on:
EF-A used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide f&ore recent data,
F037 and F038 waste estittatos.
F037 (routine) - 1.835 tons/yr
-------
P037 AND P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility if. 70
Para sources available;
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleuit refinery data base (PRDB)
No-ntigration petitions
Consents from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for FQ37 and F038 vaste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and FQ38 waste estimates:
F03? (routine)
• 80 tons/yr
-------
Facility # 70
Crude capacity: 16,000 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 40,000 gallons/day2
K waste generation:
K048: 7 6 tons/year2
K05I: 54 tons/year2
Assumpt ions:
Facility Croup 4 4
percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
K049 composition: 40 percent water,
weight5
K051 composition; 65 percent water, IS percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
API separator solids removal efficiency:
API separator oil removal efficiency:
Oil in the API skimming (to slop oil system):
CPI oil removal efficiency.
CPI solid removal efficiencv:
DAF oil removal efficiency:
DAF solid removal efficiency:
FET solid removal efficiencv:
50 percent6
75 percent6
50 percent7
S3 percent6
70 percent6
S5 percent6
50 percent6
50 percent9
Slop oil emulsion solids {K049) was not reported in TSDR survey or PRDB;
therefore, an estimated K049 quantity of 25 tons/yr was based on 1.38 metric
tons/yr (or 1.52 tons/yr) per 1.00H barrels/day3
Estimation'
Solids in the API sludge (KG51): (0,2 x 54 tons/yr) - 10.8 tons/yr
Solids in the API skimming {removed as KQ49)* <0,12 x 25 tons/yr) - 3
tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 10.8 tons/yr + 3 tons/yr - 13,8
tons/yr
Solir* in API influent wastewater: (13.8 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids removal
eff.) - 27.6 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 27.6 tons/yr - 13.8 tons/yr - 13.8 tons/yr
Quantity of API skimming: (0.52 K049 water & solids content) x 25 tons/yr)
/ (1.0 - 0.5 oil in API skimming) - 26 tons/yr
Oil in API skimming: 26 tons/yr x 0.5 - 13 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0.15 x 54 tons/yr) - 8,1 tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator: 13 tons/yr +8.1 tons/yr - 21.1 tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: 21.1 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal
e£f,) - 28.1 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 28.1 tons/yr ¦ 21.1 tons/yr - 7 tons/yr
Oil removal in CPI (F037)
(7 tons/yr oil in influent wastewater) x
(0.85 CPI oil removal efficiency11) - 6
tons/yr
-------
Solids removal in CPI (FO37):
(14 tons/yr solids in influent wastewater)
x (0,7 CPI solids removal efficiency 1') -
9.8 tons/yr
(6 tons/yr solids settling in CPI + 9.8
tons/yr oil settling in CPI) / (0.35
fraction of solids and oil in CPI sludge5)
- 45 tons/yr F037 sludge from CPI clean
out
(7 tons/yr oil in influent wastewater - 6
tons/yr oil removed by CPI) - 1 tons/yr
oil in effluent wastewater
(14 tons/yr solids in influent wastewater
- 9,S tons/yr solids removed by CPI) - 4.2
tons/yr solids in effluent wastewater
(2.1 tons/yr solids in influent
wastewater) x (0,5 FET solids removal
efficiency) - 1 tons/vr solids settling in
FET
(I tons/yr solids settling in FET) / (0.2
fraction of solids in FET sludge13) - 5
tons/yr F037 sludge from FET clean out
Sol ids in FET effluent wastewater: (2.1 tons/yr solids in influent wastewater
- 1 tons/yr solids settling in FET) - 1.1
tons/yr solids in effluent wastewater
Amount of F037 sludge froc annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation •
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinery: (76 tons/yr K048 + 25 tons/yr K049 + 34
tons/yr KQ51)/ 40,000 gallons/dav -
0.003875
Sewer clean out acount: 0.003875 x 54 acres land area of refinery
x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading
of 1.0 calculated from known refinery) -
30 tons/yr
F037 sludge from CPI clean out:
Oil in CPI effluent wastewater:
Solids in CPI effluent wastewater:
I
Solids removal in FET (F037);
F037 sludge fro© FET clean out:
-------
-------
F037 AND P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA OSS AKD TRACKING SHEET
Facility «: 71
Data sources available.
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Vs5ste Treatment, Storage. Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazsr-i-uas waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PROS)
No-cigration petitions
Cocnents fron? the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide niore recent data.
FQ37 and F038 vaste estimates:
F037 (routine)
- 433 tons/yr
-------
F037 AND F038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility /J; 72
Data sources available;
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous War: to Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting roqui rercents
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PP.D5)
No-migration petitions
Consents froo the proposed rule-
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for FQ37 and F038 va s t e estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources bi-cause the refinery did not
provide nsore recent data.
FQ37 and F038 waste estimates:
F03? (routine)
- 543 tons/yr
-------
Facility # 72
Crude capacity: 30,000 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 450,000 gallons/day2
K waste generation:
K049: 48 tons/year2
K051: ~7 tons/year2
Assumptions:
Facility Group 44
K049 composition: AO percent water. 48 percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
weight5
K051 composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
API separator solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
Oil in the API skimming (to slop oil system): 50 percent7
OWS oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
OVS solid removal efficiency: 50 percent6 .
Es titration:
Solids in the API sludge (K051); £0.2 x 7? tons/yr) - 15,4 tons/yr
Solids in the API skimming (resoved as K049): (0,12 x 48 tons/yr) - 5,76
tons/yr
Solids rerr.cved in the API separator: 15.4 tons/yr + 5.76 tons/yr - 21.16
tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (21.16 tons/yr) / (0,5 API solids removal
eff.) - 42.3*2 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 42.32 tons/yr - 21.16 tons/yr - 21.16
tons/yr
Quan*"ty of API skimming: (0.52 K049 water & solids content) x 48 tons/yr)
/ (1.0 - 0,5 oil in API skimming) - 49.92
tons/yr
Oil in API skimming: 49,92 tons/yr x 0,5 - 24.96 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (KQ51): (0,15 x 11 tons/yr) - 11.55 tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator: 24.96 tons/yr + 11.55 tons/yr - 36.51
tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: 36,51 tons/yr) / (0,75 API oil removal
eff.) - 48.7 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater; 48.7 tons/yr - 36.51 tons/yr - 12.19
tons/yr
Oil in OWS influent wastewater: (49 tons/yr oil in effluent wastewater) /
(1.0 - 0.7? oil removal efficiency ) - 196
tons/yr oil in influent wastewater
Solids in OWS influent wastewater: (42 tons/yr solids in effluent wastewater)
/ (1.0 - 0.5 solid removal efficiency ) -
84 tons/yr solids in influent wastewater
-------
196 tons/vr oil in influent wastewater •
49 oil in OWS effluent wastewater - 147
tons/yr oil settling in OWS
84 tons/yr solids in influent wastewater -
42 solids in OWS effluent wastewater - 42
tons/yr solids settling in OWS
(14 7 tons/yr oil + 42 tons/yr solids
settling in OWS) / (0.35 fraction of oil
and solids in OWS sludge5) - 540 tons/yr
F037 sludge frore OWS clean out
Amount of F037 sludge froc annuo 1 refinery sever clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):'5
Solids loading of refir.t-rv: (48 tons/vr K049 + 77 tons/vr K051)/
4 50,000 gallons/day - 0.000278
Sewer clean out amour:' 0.000278 x 106 acres land area of
refinery x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for
solids loading of 1.0 calculated from
known refinerv) - 4.23 tor.s/yr
Oil removal in OWS (F037):
Solids removal in OWS (f037);
F037 sludge from OWS clean out:
-------
# 9-2
TW^>
—*—*
0/(0/5-
ZtPAC&X.
I Oil I
-------
P037 AND F038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USS AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility i*: ?3
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Hash- Treatment, Storage. Dispos
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazard-...s waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rulf-
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F01S waste estimation:
EPA used data frox the above sources because the refinery did no;
provide rcore recent dara.
F03I and FQ3H waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 2C8 tons/yr
-------
F037 AND P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AKD TRACKING SHBST
Facility ii: 74
Data sources available:
. Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Vastr- Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rulo
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F03S waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 1,300 tons/yr
-------
P037 AKD P038 WASTR CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility ft: 7 5
Data sonrcm available:
Petroleuir refinery visics/vo] untary submission
x National Survey of Kazardou', WVir.re T reatrrenc, Storage, Disposal,
,iiid Recycling Facilities
_x National Survey of Hazardo'.i'. W/i«.tc Generators
Biennial report/state rtporilnf; requirements
California hazardous war, tic d-. r n base
:< Petroleum refinery ;ta ba.M- ff'RDB)
No-niigrat ion petitions
Comments from the proposed julr
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F03? and F03B a y t e estirtw. f 1 j
-------
FQ37 AHD PQ38 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA 0SS Am TRACKING SHEET
Facility 76
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery vis i:s/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Vas^e Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazards k waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PP.DB)
No-nsigration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data frcn the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 vaste estimates:
F03? (routine)
F038 (routine)
-44 5 tons/yr
-150 tons/yr
-------
P037 AHD F038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AMD TRACKING SHEET
Facility #: 77
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
X National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous U'nste Generators
-Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste cl/ita base
x Petroleura refinery data hnr,<- (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Coanents froa the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste est treat Inn:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide mere recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 3,259 tons/yr
-------
Facility # 77
Crude capacity; 71,000 barre is/day1
Wastewater flow: 300,000 gallons/day2
K waste generation;
KO^S; "35 tons/year2
K051; 36? tons/year2
Assumptions:
Facility Group 4 4
K049 composition: 40 percent water. -48 perct: t
weight5
K051 composition: 65 percent '-ater. IS percent
weight5
API separator solids removal e f f i c icncy:
API separator oil removal efficiency:
Oil in the API skimming (to slop oil r.yr;tcm):
OWS oil removal efficiency:
OWS solid reir.o%*al efficiency:
FET solid rercoval efficiency:
DAF oil rercoval efficiency:
DAF solid removal efficiency:
oil. and 12 percent solids bv
oil, and 20 percent solids by
50 percent6
75 percent6
50
75
50
50
85
50
percen
percen
percen
percen
percen
percen
Slop oil emulsion solids (KO-9) was nor reported in TSDR survey or PRDB;
therefore, an estimated K049 quantity of 108 tons/vr- was based on 1.38 metric
tons/vr (or 1.52 tens/yr) per 1,000 bnrrcIs/day*
Solids in the API sludge (K051): (0,2 x 367 tons/yr) - 73.4 tons/yr
Solids in the API skimralng (removed as K049): (0.12 x 108 tons/yr) - 12.96
tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 73.4 tons/yr + 12.96 tons/yr - 86.36
tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (86.36 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids rercoval
eff.) - 172.72 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 172,72 tons/yr - 86.36 tons/yr - 86.36
tons/yr
Quantity of API skimming; (0.52 K049 water 6 solids content) x 108
tons/yr) / (1.0 ¦ 0.5 oil in API skimming) -
112.32 tons/yr
Oil in AFX skinning: 112.32 tons/yr x 0.S - 56.16 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0,15 x 367 tons/yr) - 55.05 tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator: 56.16 tons/yr * 55.05 tons/yr - 111.21
tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: 111.21 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal
off,) - 148.3 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 148.3 tons/yr - 111.21 tons/yr - 37.09
tons/yr
-------
Solids in FET influent wastewater:
(173 tons/vr solids in effluent
wastewater) / (1.0 - 0.5 fraction of
solids settling based on 30 min.10
residence time) - 346 tons/vr solids in
influent wastewater
Solids removal in FET (F037): 346 tons/yr solids in influent wastewater
- 173 solids in FET effluent wastewater -
173 tons/yr solids setcling in FET
F03? sludge from FET clean out <17 3 tons/yr solids settling in FET) /
{0.2 fraction of solids in FET sludr.r*'0) -
$63 tor,' 'vr F037 sludge front FET clean out
Oil in OWS influent wastewater. (148 tons/yr oil in effluent wastewater) /
(1,0 - 0,75 oil removal efficiency ) - 592
tons/yr oil in influent wastewater
Solids in OWS influent wastew/itrr: (346 tons/yr solids in affluent
wastewater) / (1.0 - 0.5 solid ien-.oval
efficiency ) « 692 tons/yr solids in
influent wastewater
Oil removal in OWS (F037);
Solids removal in OWS (F037):
F037 sludge from OWS clean out.
Oil in DAF float (KG48);
Solid in DAF float (K048):
592 tons/yr oil in influent wastewater -
143 oil in OWS effluent wastewater - 444
tons/yr oil settling in OWS
692 tons/yr solids in influent wastewater
- 346 solids in OWS effluent wastewater -
346 tons/yr solids settling in OWS
(444 tons/yr oil +• 346 tons/yr solids
settling in OWS) / (0.35 fraction of oil
and solids in OWS sludge5) - 2257 tons/yr
F037 sludge from OWS clean out
'17 09 tons/yr) x (0.85 DaF oil removal
efficiency) - 31.5 tons/yr
•86.4 tons/yr) x (0.5 removal efficiency) -
4 3,2 tons/ vr
Oil in DAF effluent wastewater-
Solids in DAF effluent wastewater;
(37.09 tons/yr) - (31.5 oil removed by DAF
float - 5.56 tons/yr
(86,4 tons/yr influent solids) - 43.2
tons/yr removed by DAF float - 43.2
tons/yr
Arsount of F037 sludge from ar,:r;a 1 refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known '.ewer clean out quantities);15
Solids loading of refinerv: (735 tons/yr KC48 + 108 tons/yr K049 + 367
tons/yr K051)/ 300,000 gallons/dav -
0.004033
-------
Sever clean out amour.:
0.004033 x 23? acres land area of
refinery x 143./ tons/(yr/acre) (for
solids loading of 1.0 calculated from
known refinery) - 137 tons/yr
-------
TlWts
—>
CMIS.
^eBi»rw
Fran
F6T
'mi
4- T7
r
AFx
¦'iccrt
i/,
~~¥
"bi^awfcfre
ta>4s
"5£op
Oil.
isu
ii
1
kr>+f
-------
P037 AND F036 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facilicv
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery vis 11 s/volunrnry submission
x National Survey of Hnz-ndonn U'a&te Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facil it n-r, (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste- (^aerators
Biennial report/stare rr-;>c»rting requirements
California hazardous v.-ste ri/itn base
x Petroleum refinery (PROS)
No-Migration petit;.;:.'.
Comments from the- profOM-d rule
Organic Toxicity Survt v
Basis for HOT and F028 vas:e h ; i c:.t i on :
EPA used data from the above- '.ourccs because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 ar.d F033 waste estimates ;
F037 (routine) - 103 tcr,< yr
-------
PQ37 AXD P03B WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility : Petroleum refiner* !ata b.ir-i* (PROS)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposc-r! rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F03? and F038 waste estimation:
EPh used data frox the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and FQ33 waste estimates:
F03? (routine) - 7B tor.s/yr
-------
P037 AND P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA OSE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility : SO .
Data sources available:
. Petroleum refir.ery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling facilities (TSDR survpy)
x National Survey of Hazardous. Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous vns:c data base
x Petroleum refin'.-rv data ba?:e (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Corn-Tents from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F03F waste es?ir:..tion:
EPA used data froz the above sources because the refir.ery did not
provide more recent data.
FJ37 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 2.657 tons/vr
-------
Facility * 80
Crude capacity: ^,700 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow; 15,000 gallons/day2
Facility Croup I4
Es t ination:
Since most F037 and F03B vastus exhihi t tht 7 J for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also lar.d di spose f'J:7 and F038 wastes. Because EPA has
not received notification fro:: this refinery identifying land-based ur.ics
(e.g., surface impoundments) accepting newly identified TC wastes, EPA assumes
that the surface impoundments have been closed ar.d the functions of the
surface impoundments have been replaced by tanks, EPA believes that tanks
replacing surface impoundments would be- cleaned out routinely to remove
accumulated sludges (which are considered routinely generated F037 and F038
wastes). Based on informatics, provided In the TC questionnaire, we estimated
the quantity of wastes generated from these routine tank cleanouts to be on an
average one-third as much as wastes j;iT,i r.itcd frcrn cleanout of surface
impoundments. Calculations for surface J n-poundrent cleanout (based on settling
of solids in an impoundment that war; cleaned out every five years on the
average) and for tank cleanouts (bn.'.ed on the calculations for surface
impoundment cleanout) are presented below.
Quantitv of sludge generated from the r.urface impoundments that have beer,
closed:
Amount of F waste sludge from upstre.iin •urface impoundment:
126,5A2 sq.ft area of the surface impoundment x 2 ft depth of the
sludge16 x 63 Ib/cu.ft density of the .'.Judge- 15. .2 92 lbs - 7,972 tons
Quantity of sludge generated frora tanks:
7.972 tons of surface impoundment sludge 1/3*7 - 2.657 ton/yr of tank
sludge.
I
-------
Z.ovztyA,
FCP
4 Sv
J)/*cmz£t£
-------
F037 AND P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility o: 81
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visics/voluntary submission
x National Survey cf Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling ?£cilitic-s (TSDR survey)
>; National Survey cf Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/srace reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PR.DB)
No-migration petitions
Consents frorc the propoi-cd rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F03£ was *•*.' in-.nt ion:
EPA used data fro:z the above sources because the refinery did not
provide rcore recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 122 tons/vr
-------
Facility # 81
Crude capacity; 153,000 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 3,530,000 gallons/day2
K vaste generation:
K051: 31 tons/year2
Assumptions:
OVS oil removal efficiency:
OVS solid removal efficiency:
FET solid removal efficiency:
Facility Group 24
75 percent6
50 percent6
50 percent9
water, 48 percent oil,
water, 15 percent oil,
K049 composition: 40 percen
weight5
K051 composition: 65 percen
weight5
API separator solids recoval efficiency:
API separator oil removal efficiency:
Gil in the? API skimming (to slop oil system):
and 12 percent solids by
and 20 percent solids by
50 percent6
75 percent6
50 percent7
Slop oil emulsion solids (K049) was not reported in TSDR survey or PP.DS;
therefore, an estircated K049 quantity of 233 tor.s/yr was based on 1, 3S metric
tons/yr (or 1.52 tons/yr) per 1,000 barrels/dav9
Est iaint ton:
F037 waste generated by OVS is 31 tons/yr
Solids In the OWS sludge
-------
Solids removal in FET (F037): (34 tons/yr solids in influent wascevacer)
X (0.5 FET solids removal efficiency) - I?
tons/yr solids settling in FET
F037 sludge frox FET clean out: (I7 tons/vr solids settling in FET) / (0.2
fraction of solids in FET sludge10} - 85
tons/yr F037 sludge from FET clean out
Solids in FET effluent wastewater: (V* tons/yr solids in influent in effluent
wastewater
Amount of F037 sludge from annu/il refinery sever clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sever clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinery: (233 tons/yr KQ49 + 31 rons/vr K031)/
3,530.000 gallons/day » 0.000075
Sever clean out amount: 0.000075 x 510 acres land area of
refinery n 1-3,7 tons/(yr/acre) (for
f.olids loading of 1.0 calculated from
known refinery) - 5.50 tons/yr
-------
rft I
fcllV^TEP
¦H $UUb££
"TifWK*
"tUjIts
-------
PQ37 AKD PQ38 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE A!ID TRACKING SHEET
Facility ?7: 82
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
k National Survey of Hazardous Was te Treatment, S toragc-. Disposal,
and Reeve 1 inr, Facilities (TSDR r.uvvi-v}
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleurr. refinf-ry ra ba*.c {i'RDB}
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule-
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and FQ38 waste estimates:
FO-7 (routine)
cons/yr
-------
Paeility N 82
Crude capacity: 10,000 barrels/day*
Wastewater flow: 30.000 gal Icr.s/day2
Assumptions:
Facility Croup 44
F03? generation race of 21 ter.s/yr by CP I is estimated based on 1.3S ire trie
tens/yr per 1,000 b/sd of rc-£;r.f-ry cnpacicv8
Estimation:
Arcour.t of F03? sludge froi ar.r.-.i.il refinery sever clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with fcrevr. svwr clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of re: .r rv: ( 21 tons/vr KQS1)/ 30,000 gallons/day -
0.0007
Sever clean out amount• 0.0007 x 29 acres land area of refinery
I-*3.7 tor.s/(yr/acre) (for solids loading
of 1.0 calculated from known refinery) -
2.92 tons/yr
-------
C?1
¦Jrftft 1
bl6C^K6(C
_
6ioV
OiL
'Kl>^
-------
P037 AKD P038 WASTE CAPACITY AHALYSIS:
DATA USE AKD TRACKING SHEET
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste- Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous vaste data base
x Petroleum refinery ct^ra base (PRDB)
So-ir.igration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for FQ37 and P038 vaste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide raore recent data.
F037 and FC38 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 6 tor.s/vr
-------
P037 AKD P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility »*: 34
Data sources available-:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous *V.:te Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous vaste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PROS)
No-migration per..ions
Comments from the proposed rule
_x Organic Toxicity Survey
Babis for F037 and F03S vaste es t irc:i t ion:
EPA used data froc the -above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 vaste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 1.6^7 tons/yr
F038 (routine) - 5,3^8 tons/yr
F037 (surface impoundments) - 0 tons {7/92 - 12/92)
F037 (surface irpoundrents) - 0 tons (1/93 - 12/93)
F037 (surface impoundments) - 0 tons (1/94 - 6/94)
-------
Facility » 84
Crude capacity: 167.000 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 1,150,000 gal lens/day2
K waste generation:
K0-3
KG 51
14,748 tons/vear*
IS? tons/year5
6S5 tons/year3
Assumptions:
48 percent
15 percent
Facility Group 54
K049 composition: 40 percer.t water
we ight*
K051 composition: 65 percent water
weight5
API separator solids rezov;! efficiency:
API separator oil rerroval efficiency:
CPI separator solids recoval efficiency:
CPI separator oil removal efficiency:
DAF unit solids removal efficiency:
DAF unit oil removal efficiency:
IAF unit solids rerroval efficiency:
IAF unit oil removal efficiency:
Oil in API and CPI skitrjeing (to slop oil systers) :
oil, and 12 percent
oil, and 20 percent
6
solids by
solids bv
50 percent1
75 percent6
70 percent6
$5 percent6
50 percent6
85 percent6
50 percent6
85 percent6
85 percent7
This facility has a CPI separator but has been reporting CPI sludge as K051,
which is API sludge. For the purpose of this capacity analysis, the CPI
sludge is considered an FG37 waste.
This facility has a IAF unit but has been reporting IAF sludge as K048, which
is DAF sludge. For the purpose of this capacity analysis, the IAF sludge is
consideijd an FG37 waste.
Estimation:
The 685 tons of K051 waste reported in the TSDR Survey includes wastes from
both the API separator and CPI separator (these two unit are in parallel).
The following estimation assumes that the wastewater is split evenly between
the CPI separator and API separator. The API separator, therefore, generates
277 tons/yr of K04S sludge and the CPI separator generates 408 tons/yr of F037
sludge (the suns of API and CPI sludge quantities is 685 tons/yr). The
difference in sludge quantities generated is due to differences in API and CPI
separator efficiencies.
The 14,748 tons of K048 waste reported in the TSDR Survey includes floats from
both the DAF and IAF units (these two unit are in parallel). The estimation
above indicates that the DAF unit accounts for 62 percent (or 9,200 tons) of
-------
Che cora1 f lone quantity and the IA F unit accounts for 38 percent (or 5,543
tons) of the float quantity. The DAF unit generates more float than the IAF
unit because solids and oil in the DAF influent (or API effluent) is higher
than solids and oil in the IAF infiur-nt (or C?I effluent).
Amount of F03? sludge frox annual refinery sever clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sever clean out quantities):15
Solids lo«din£ of refinery: tons/vr K048 + 18? tons/vr K0-»9 +
tens/vr K0S1)/ 1,150,000 gallons/day -
o.on^s
Sever clean out ar-our.t; 0.013IK x 633 acres land area of refinery
x 143.7 tons 'iyr/acre) (for solids loading
t4 1,0 calculated frorn known refinery) -
1,2^9 tons/vr
The amount of F037 (routine) vttr.it: reported is the sum of the sludge
from the annual refinery ?c--r clean our. and the sludge generated by the CPI
separator.
This refinery subxirced data in the? Organic TC Questionnaire on vhen
surface impoundment (,s) would be cleaned out ar.d closed (or retrofitted) and
the amount of wastes that would be c 1 i-am d out. Using this information, the
EPA *.\js able to determine the quantity of FC37 ard F038 wastes removed forrr.
surface impoundment (s) during the tin**- periods listed below:
Julv 1. 29?2
Jan. 1. 1993
Jan. 1. 1994
Dec. 31, 1992
Dec. 31. 1993
June 30, 1994
0 tons
0 tons
0 tons
-------
T
iKosn
>nrl «
(ttO+V\
I Oil * w'Ur
r>ri fflit.ti
«#<0 4«f4V4»
v^-4 4«r
wr«-
H/O/Kblu i
4S7 -fw>
~Mi-r Aif&rr f-£o^
I
-------
P037 ASD F038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
2ATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage. Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDP. survey)
x National Survey oi Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state rtporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleums refinery data bar.c (PRDB3
N'o-migracion petitions
Comrrents frors the croposrd rule
x Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste es t :~.>t i on:
EPA used data frort the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recer.t d-iza.
F037 "id F038 vaste estics:#s:
F03? (routine) - 10,231 cons/vr
F03? (surface iepoudsents) - 0 tons (7/92 - 12/92)
F037 (surface impoundment si - 500 tons (1/93 - 12/93}
F037 (surface impoundments) ~ 10,500 tons (1/94 - 6/94)
-------
Facility # 85
Crude capacity: 1 IS,GOO barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 1,301,000 gallons/day2
K waste generation:
K04S: 68.340 tons/year3
K051: 6 . 384 cons/year3
Assurrpt i on?; :
Facilitv Group 4
CPI sludge composition: 65 percent water. 15 percent, oil.
solidr* by weight*
CPI separator solids reiroval efficiency: 70 percent5
CPI separator oil rernoval efficiency: S3 percent6
DAF unit solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
ind 20 perct
DAF unit oil removal efficiency:
85
percent
This facility has a CPI separator but has been reporting CPI sludge as K051,
which is API sludge. For the purpose of this capacity analysis, the CPI
sludge is considered an F037 waste.
Estirrat ion:
CPI sludge (F037) was reported as K0S1 in the TSDR Survey,
reported was 6,384 tons.
The amount
Solids in the CPI sludge iF037):
Solids in CPI influent wastewater:
Solids in CPI effluent wastewater:
Oil in CPI sludge (F037): (0-15
Oil in CPI influent wastewater:
Oil in CPI effluent wastewater:
Amount of F037 sludge frora annual re
based on refineries with known sewer
Solids loading cf refinery:
Sewer clean out amount:
(0.2 >; 6.3S4 tons/yr) - 1,2/6.8 tons/yr
(1,276.8 tens/yr) / £0.7 CPI solids
rerroval eff.) - 1,824 tons/yr
1,824 tons/yr - 1,276.8 tons/yr = 547.2
tons/yr
;; 6,384 tons/yr) - 957.6 tons/yr
(957.6 tor.s/yr) / (0.85 CPI oil removal
eff.) - 1,126.6 tons/yr
1,126.6 tons/yr - 957,6 tons/yr - 169
tons/yr
finery sewer clean out (extrapolation
clean out quantities):15
(68,340 tons/yr K048 + 6,384 tons/yr
KQ51)/ 1,301.000 gallons/day - 0.05744
0.05744 \ 472 acres land area of refinery
x 143.7 cons/(yr/acre) (for solids loadinr
of 1.0 calculated frora known refinery) -
3,896 tons/yr
This refinery submitted data in the Organic TC Questionnaire on when
surface irrpoundmt nt(s) would be cU antd out and closed (or retrofitted) and
-------
the amount of wastes that would he cleaned out. Using this information, the
EPA was able to determine the quantity of F03? and F038 wastes removed form
surface impoundment(s) during the time periods listed below:
July i, 1902 • Dec. 31. 1992 - 0 tons
Jan" 1. 1991 • Dec, 31, 1993 - 500 tons
Jan. 1, 199'« * June- 30, 199i - 10,500 tons
-------
| Questionnaire A J General Facility Information | Page 30 |
* V"
• 4 T
N H W
wa-sth AcnvATero su1^-
o
HW (HEAT
exchanger*
HW
SLUDGE
m2o
OAF
EQUALIZATION
BASIN
I* (I
HW l^T*V *
KeS*
I
-------
P037 A3SD P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility •-/: 86
Data sources available;
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
• Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDS)
No-migration petitions
Consents from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data,
F037 a' •*. F038 waste estimates:
F03? (routine) - 36 cons/yr
-------
P037 AND P03 8 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Faci1 icy a: 8 7
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
National Survev of Hazardous V/ivte- Treatment. Storage . Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
• _x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB;
No-nsigrat ion petitions
Comments froc the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EFA used data froa the above sources because the refinery did not
provide tsore recent data.
F037
-------
Pacility # 87
Crude capacitv: 8 . 500 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 30,000 gallons/day*
K waste generation:
KQ51: 1 tons/year2
Assumpt ions :
Facility Group 34
K051 composition: 65 percent water, 15 jh-jt*
weight5
API separator solids rertoval efficiency:
API separator oil removal efficiency:
CPI separator solids removal efficiency:
CPI separator oil removal efficiency:
»;t oil, and 20 percent solicit b\
50 percent6
75 percent6
"0 percent6
85 percent6
Estimation:
Solids in API sludge (K051); ',0.2
Solids in API influent wastewater:
Solids in API effluent wastewater:
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0.15
Oil in API influent wastewater:
Oil in API effluent wastewater:
Solids in CPI influent wastewater:
Solids r err oval in CPI (F03 7) :
Oil in CPI influent wastewater:
Oil removal in CrI (F03?):
F037 CPI separator sludge:
x 1 tons/vr) - 0.2 tons/yr
(0,2 tons/yr) / (0,5 API solids removal
i f f.) - 0.4 tons/yr
0 Jt tons/yr - 0.2 tons/yr - 0.2 tons/vr
x I tons/yr) - 0.15 tons/yr
(0.15 tons/yr) / (0,75 API oil removal
off,) - 0.2 tens/yr
0.2 tons/yr - 0.15 tons/yr - 0.05 tons/vr
(O.'i tons/yr solids in CPI effluent
wvir.trw.'ittr) / (1.0 - 0,7 fraction of
so]Ids removed by CPI) - 1.3 tons/yr
solids in influent wastewater
1,3 tons/yr solids in influent wastewater
- 0.4 solids in CPI effluent wastewater -
0,9 tons/yr solids removed by CPI
separator
0.2 tons/yr oil in API influent / (1 -
0.85 fraction of oil removed by CPI) - 1.3
tons/yr
1.3 tons/yr x 0.85 CPI oil removal eff. -
1.I tons/yr
(0,9 tons/yr solids + 1.1 tons/vr oil) /
(0,35 fraction of solids and oil in CPI
sludge) - 5.7 tons/yr
The CFI separator that is parallel with the CPI-API loop receives that same
composition wastewater as the CPI separator in the CPI-API loop. Assuming
that wastewater flow is distributed evenly between the CPI separators, the CPI
separator that is parallel with the CPI-API loop also generates 5.7 tons/yr of
F037 sludge.
-------
Since most F03? and F038 wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also land dispose F037 and F038 wastes. Because EPA has
not received notification tror. this refinery identifying land-based units
(e.g.. surface impoundments) ;«ccept ing newly identified TC wastes, EPA assumes
that the surface impoundments hive been closed and the functions of the
surface impoundments have bee:, replaced by tanks. EPA believes that tanks
replacing surface irpound.Ter.ts would be cleaned out routinelv to remove
accumulated sludges (.which arc considered routinely generated F03? and F03S
wastes). Based on information provided in the TC questionnaire, we estimated
the quantity of wastes generated from these routine tank cleanouts to be on an
average one* third as rruch as v.v.tcs generals.1 from cleanout of surface
impoundments. Calculations for surface impoundment cleanout (based on settling
of solids in an impoundment ti»r was cleaned out every five vears on the
average) and for tank cleanout:. (based on the calculations for surface
impoundment cleanout) are presented below.
Quantity of sludge generated from the surface impoundments that have beer,
closed:
The cil and solids composition of wastewaters entering the downstream
impoundment is the average oil .ind solids composition of wastewaters from the
CPI-AFI loop and from the CPI separator:
(0.2 tons/vr solids in API effluent + 0. ** tons/yr solids in CPI effluent) / 2
-0.3 tons/vr solids in impoundment influent wastewater
(0.05 tons/yr oil in API effluent + 0.2 tons/vr oil in CPI effluent) / 2 -
0.13 tons/yr oil in impoandmc nt influent wastewater
(0.3 tons/yr solids + 0.13 tons/vr oil) / (0.35 fraction of solids and oil in
impoundment sludge) - 1.2 tens/yr
Quantity of sludge generated from tanks:
I tons of surface impoundment sludge x 1 /317 - 0 ton/yr of tank sludge.
Amount ot F037 sludge from annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sower clean out quantities):'5
Solids loading of refiner-.*; (1 ton/yr K051)/ 30,000 gallons/day °
0.00003
Sewer clean out amount: 0.00003 x 28 acres land area of refinery x
lu3.7 cons/Cyr/acre) (for solids loading
of 1.0 calculated from known refinery) -
0.1 tons/yr
-------
{
-------
LUBE PLANT D.A.F. WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM
DAF EFFLUENT TO EQUALIZATION OASN
TOP SCUM
FROM API SEPARATOR
IN LUBE PLANT
DE3ION 6000 OPM
NORMAL 2300 OPM
RECYCLE WATER
FA-1004
FLOCCULATtOh
TANK
FROM EQUALIZATION 0A3IN
FA-lOOflA
OAF TANK
BOTTOM
9LUOOE
FA-1OO0A
Afl SAT.TAW3
FA-100CB
6cv^*tw
o-
k-h*
FA-1012
81U0QE
OEACR.
TK.
"IT*
tV-©
i \ .
TOP SCUM
FA-10008
DAF TANK
—~
BOTTOM
8LUD0E
J
J
&
CON ).
-t*^r90'T1
•>r
FA—1013
OAF
FLOAT TK.
(l*- oof)
COND.
STEAM
.h1uu 7*vs
K-MV
M SPjLLi LEAKS Qf\_RUft:QFE. txj-
DAF FLOAT , ,
(VUpO-94 ^
1BO OPM. T
M.
TO TRUCK FOR HAULWO
TO SALE
PUMP
1 BO OPM.
ste/m E$Iven
^ DRAIN
^CSIQK
r AINMENT
AREA SUMP
-------
<.
8 <£>
d:
v- V-
o
T
-5H
-------
P037 AND P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility 38
Data sources available;
Petroleun: refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDK survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous vastc- data base
x Petroleun refinery data base- (PP.DB)
No-migration petitions
Comments f roro the proposed rule-
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 vaste estimation:
EPA used data from the above source; because the refinery did nor.
provide tsore recent data.
F037 and *038 vaste estimates:
FOB? (routine) - 22,460 tons/yr
F038 (routine) - 31,220 tons/yr
-------
P037 AK3 P038 MASTS CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AMD TRACKING SHEET
Facility P: 39
Data sourct-s av.iil.ihle:
Petroleum refinery visits voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage. Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities iTSOR survey)
_x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous vaste data base
x Petroleum refinery b:»se (FRDB)
No-rcigrntlon petitions
Consents tv
-------
Facility # 89
Crude capacity: 6,300 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow; 720,000 cal lons/day2
Assumptions:
Facility Croup 4 4
K049 composition: 40 percent water, 4fc percent oil. and 12 percent solids by
weight5
K051 composition: 65 percent vAtcr, IS pcrcc-nt oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
CPI separator solids removal rfficwncy; 70 percent6
CPI separator oil removal efficiency: 85 percent6
FET solid removal efficiency: 50 percent9
The F03? waste quantity from fPI separators in parallel was not reported in
TSDR Survey or PRDB; therefc ' • an clt. imated F037 quantity of 15 tons/yr was
based on 2.2 rr.etric tons/yr i,or 2.4 tor.s/yr) per 1,000 barrels/day3
Slop oil emu1sion solids (K049) quantity was not reported in TSDR Survey or
PRDB: therefore, an estimated K049 quantity of 10 tons/yr was based on 1.38
metric tons/yr (or 1.52 tons/yr) por 1.000 barrels/day8
Estimation:
Assuming the CPI separators in parallel receive the same quantity of
wastewater influent, the F037 sludge settling in the' FET after the CPI
separators is calculated as follows:
Solids in the CPI sludge ; (0 .2 x 13 cor.s/yr) - 3 tons/yr
Solids in the CPI skicuning (removed as V049): (0.12 x 10 tons/yr) ¦ 1.2
tons/yr
Solids removed in the CPI separator: 3 tons/yr +1.2 tons/yr - 4.2
tons/yr
Sol ids in CPI influent wastewater: (4.2 tons/yr) / (0.7 CPI solids removal
eff.) - 6 tons/vr
Solids in CPI effluent wastewater: 6 tens/yr - 4.2 tons/yr - 1.8 tons/yr
Solids removal in FET (F037): (1.5 tons/yr solids in influent
wastewater) x (0.5 FET solids removal
baefcd on settling time calculations9) -
0.9 tons/yr solids settling in FET
Solids in FET effluent wastewater: (1.3 tons/yr solids in influent wastewater
» 0.9 tons/yr solids settling in FET) -
0.r3 tons/yr solids in effluent wastewater
F037 sludge from FET clean out: (0.9 tons/yr solids settling in FET) /
CO.2 fraction of solids in FET sludge10) -
^. > tons/yr F037 sludge from FET clean out
-------
Anount of F037 sludge froi annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known svver clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refir.erv; (10 tons/vr K049)/ 720.000 gallons/dav -
0,00001389
Sower clean out asount: 0,00001339 x 21 acres land area of
refinery x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for
solids loading of 1.0 calculated from
known refinery) - 0 tons/yr
-------
F^-OjCAS
4/lu>4q
H"}
t .
RT
ZkittXnfi
K
^chbxje.
Fo?1
-------
F031 AND F038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility p: 90
Data .sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal.
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste* Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PROS)
No-Eigrst ion pet it;-ns
Comments from the proposed rule-
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for FQ37 and F038 waste cstjfr.ntion:
EPA used data from the above sources btcause the refinery did net
provide core recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 329 tons/yr
-------
P037 AKt) P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility «: 91
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinerv visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey cf Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage. Dispos
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
_x National Survey cf Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refiner-, .lata base (FRD5)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste- estimation:
EPA used data from th<- above sources because the refinery did no
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste est :
F037 (routine) - 32 tons/vr
F038 (routine) - i tons/vr
-------
Facility * 91
Crude capacity: 25.000 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 40,000 5a!tons/day*
K waste generation:
K051: 13 tons/year2
Assu,-tpt ions:
Facility Group I4
K049 composition: 40 percent water, 48 percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
weight5
KC31 composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
API separator solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
API separator solids removal efficiency: 70 percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency: 85 percent6
Oil in the API skimming (to slop oil system): 50 percent7
Slop oil emulsion solids (KU-.1') quantity was not reported in TSDR Survey or
FRB3; therefore, an estimated K0-»9 quantity of 38 tons/yr was based on 1.38
metric tons/yr (or 1.52 tons/yr) per 1,000 barrels/day8
Estimation:
Solids in the API sludge (K051): (0.2 x 13 tons/yr) - 2.6 tons/yr
Solids in the API skicrxir.g (removed as K049): (0.12 x 38 tons/yr) - 4.6
tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 2,6 tons/yr +4,6 tons/yr -7,2
tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (7.2 tons/yr) / <0,5 API solids removal
eff.) - 14.4 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 14.4 tons/yr - 7.2 tons/yr - 7.2 tons/yr
Quantity of API skimming: (0.52 K049 water & solids content x 38 tons/yr)
/ (1.0 - 0.5 oil in API skimming) - 39.5 tons/yr
Oil in API skimming: 39.5 tons/yr x 0,5 - 19.8 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0.15 x 13 tons/yr) - 2 tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator: 19.8 tons/yr + 2 tons/yr - 21,8 tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: (21.8 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal
eff.) - 29.1 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 29.1 tons/yr • 21.8 tons/yr - 7.3 tons/yr
Assuming that API effluent is split equally between a downstream API separator
(«2 API separator) and a CPI separator (these separators are in parallel):
l>2 API solids removal: (7,2 tons/yr / 2 x 0.5 API solids removal eff.) - 1,8
tons/yr
Solids in ,'i2 API effluenc wastewater: (7.2 tons/yr / 2) - 1.8 tons/yr -
1.8 tons/yr ¦
m2 API oil removal: (7.3 tons/yr / 2 x 0.75 API oil removal eff.) - 2.7
tons/yr
-------
Oil in «2 API effluent »'as:cvater: (7.3 tons/yr / 2) - 2.7 tons/yr » 1.0
?or.s/yr
Low*rate aeration pond sludge (FOIZ) :
CPI solids removal: \'.2 tons/vr / 2 x 0,7 API solids removal eff.) - 2.5
tons/yr
Solids in CPI effluent wastewater: (7,2 tons/yr / 2) • 2.5 tons/yr - 1.1
tons/yr
CPI oil removal: i ~ . 3 cor.s/yr / 2 x 0.85 API oil removal eff.) - 3.1
:or.s/vr
Oil in CPI effluent vasrevater: (7.3 tons/yr / 2) - 3.1 tor.s/y r - 0.6
tons/vr
CPI sludge (F037) quantitv; (2 > tons/vr solids + 3.1 tons/yr oil) / (0.35
fraction of solids and oil in CPI sludge) - 16
tons/vr
Sir.ce most F037 and F028 wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also land di&pcse F037 and F038 wastes, because EPA has
not received notification from thi:; refinery identifying land-based units
(e.g., surface impoundments "> acc**ptin£ newly identified TC wastes. EPA assiirr.es
that the surface irr.poundt: r*have been closed and the functions of the
surface impoundments have zti-n rcp'aced by tanks. EPA believes that tanks
replacing surface impoundments would he cleaned out routinely to remove
accumulated sludges (which are cor;:, i dored routinely generated F037 sr.d F038
wastes). Based on information prov; di d in the TC questionnaire, we estimated
the quantity of waste's generated frorfi these routine tank clcanouts to be on an
average one-third g.s much as wastes generated from cleanout of surface
icpcundLients. Calculat i _r.s for surface- impoundment cleanout (based on settling
of solids in an impoundment that was cleaned out every five years on the
average) and for tank cleanouts (based on the calculations for surface
impoundment cleanout) are presented below.
Quantity of sludge generated frocr the surface impoundments that have been
closed:
F033 low-rate aeration pcr.d sludge: (1.8 tons/yr solid in API effluent + 1,1
tons/yr solids in CPI effluent 4-1.0
tor.s/yr oil in API effluent + 0.6 tons/yr
oil in CPI effluent) / (0.33 fraction of
oil and solids in sludge) - 12.9 tons/yr
Quantity of sludge generated from tanks:
13 tons of surface impoundment sludge x 1/317 - 4 ton/yr of tank sludge.
Amount of F037 sludge fron annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with kr.own sewer clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of re fine rv: (38 tons/yr K049 + 13 tor.s/vr K051) /
40,000 gallons/day - 0.001275
Sewer clean out ancur.t: 0.001275 x 83 acres land area of refinery
x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading
of 1.0 calculated from known refinery) -
15 tons/yr
-------
it q
An
4PL
4^
pep
•H3E
CP I
foSI
T^t-op
^>1 fl?'L.
-vkjot^
UJkO^AJfc
Ae^LTiw-
^PWste
3/
FaSS
CPt
IT*
-------
F037 AH3 P038 WASTE CAPACITY AHALYSXS:
DATA USS hm TRACKING SHEET
Facility it: 92
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Vaite Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PROS)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F03S vaste estimation:
EPA used data froc the above sources because the refinery did not
provide ttore recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 13,945 tons/yr
F038 (routine) - 1,494 tons/yr
-------
Facility » 92
Crude capacity: 46,000 barre 1 s/dav1
Wastewater flow: 55,000 gallons/d;iy*
K waste generation:
K051: 2.200 tons/year2
Assumes ions:
Facility Croup 4 4
K051 composition: 65 percent v.iier, ]5 percent oil. and 20 percent solids bv
weight5
API separator solids removal efficiency; 50 percent4
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
CPI separator solids removal efficiency: 70 percent6
CPI separator oil removal efficiency: S5 percent6
Oil in API separator skiaing (to slop oil systen-,1: 50 percent7
FET solid removal efficiency: 50 percent9
Slop oil emulsion solids (K~ • :) quanti ty was not reported in TSDR Survey or
PRDB; therefore, an estizated K049 quant.ity of 6S tons/yr was based on 1.38
metric tons/yr (or 1.52 tons/yr) per 1.000 barrels/day8
Estimation:
Solids in API sludge (K051): (0.2 x 2.200 tons/yr) - 440 tons/yr
Solids in API skimaing (resoved as K049): (0.12 x 63 tons/yr) - 8,2 tons/yr
Solids removed in the AFI separator: •'•40 tens/yr + 8.2 tons/yr - 443.2
t or.s/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (448.2 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids removal
eff.) - 696.4 tor.s/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 896.4 tons/yr - 448.2 tons/yr - 448.2
tons/yr
Quantity of API skimming: (0.52 K049 water & solids content x 68 tons/yr)
/ (1.0 • 0.5 oil in API skirraing) * 70.7 tons/yr
Oil in API skiiazing: 70.7 tons/yr x 0.5 - 35,4 tons/vr
Oil in 'PI sludge (K051): (0.15 x 2,200 tons/yr) - 330 tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator: 330 tons/yr + 35.4 tons/yr - 365.4 tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: (365.4 tons/yr) / (0,75 API oil removal
eff.) - 487.2 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 487.2 cons/yr - 365.4 tons/yr - 121,8
tons/yr
Solids in neutralizing tank influent: (896.4 tons/yr solids in API
influent wastewater) / (1 - 0.75
neutralizing tank solid removal
based on settling time
calculations'1) - 1,195.2 tons/yr
-------
Solids removal, in neutralizing t.mk (F038):
F038 sludge from neutralising t/mk clean out;
1,195.2 tons/yr solids in
neutralizing tank influent -
896.4 tons/yr solids in
neutralizing tank effluent -
298.8 tons/yr solids settling
in neutralizing tank
(298.8 cons/yr solids settling
in tank) / (0.2 fraction of
solids in tank sludge12) -
1,494 tons/yr F03S sludge from
neutralizing tank clean out
Assuming that wastewater flow to the- neutralizing tank is primarily froa the
C?1 separator and that the FET in parall« 1 with the CPI separator is cnlv used
to handles periodic flew disturb.-mcts:
Solids in CPI influent wastewater:
Solids removal in CPI (F037):
Oil in CPI influent wastewater:
Oil removal ir. CPI (FG37):
F037 CPI separator sludge:
(1,195.2 tons/yr solids in CPI effluent
wastewater) / (1.0 - 0.7 fraction of
solids removed by CPI) - 3,984 tons/yr
solids in influent wastewater
1.984 tons/yr solids in influent
wastewater - 1,195,2 solids in C?I
effluent wastewater - 2,788-8 tons/vr
solids removed by CPI separator
487,2 tons/yr oil in API influent / (1 -
0.85 fraction of oil removed by C?I) -
3,248 tons/vr
3,248 tons/yr x 0.85 CPI oil removal eff.
« 2,760,8 tons/yr
(2,788.8 tons/yr solids + 2,760.3 tons/yr
oil) / (0.35 fraction of solids and oil in
CPI sludge) - 15,856 tons/yr
Amount of F037 sludge from annu.nl refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewt-r clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinery: (68 tons/yr K049 + 2,200 tons/yr K051)/
550,000 gallons/day - 0,004124
Sewer clean out aaount: 0.004124 x 150 acres land area of refinery
x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading
of 1.0 calculated from known refinery) -
89 tons/yr
-------
41 It.
FEt
_Z2533_
-------
P037 A2Q FO3 0 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility «: 93
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery vis i t;,/vo luntary submiss ion
x National Survt'v of Hazardous War>te Treatment, Storage. Disposal,
ant* Recycling Facilities (TSDK survey)
x National Survey of Kjzardour, *astc Generators
Biennial report/stste reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery c.\?a buy.c (PRDB)
N'o-rrigration pctitic:
Cornrrents from the propoxi H rule-
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste est itn-n. '.on:
EPA used data from the aV-vt* sourcts because the refinery did not
provide more recent data
F037 ar.d F038 waste estimates
F03? (routine) - 36 ccr.s-yr
-------
P037 AKD F038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility 94
Data sources available:
Fetroleujn refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage. Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities {TSDR survey)
x N'ational Survey of Kar.irdnus Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous -.istc data base
__x' Pettoleuii! refinery daiu b.ir.e (PRDB)
No-migration petiticr.s
Comnttnts from the prcpo-.rd rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste imat ion:
EPA used data fro® the abov* sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and FOBS waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 3,494 cans/yr
F03S (routine) - 174 tons/yr
-------
F037 AND PC38 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA 05E AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility fi: 95
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery vi%ijk.voluntary submission
x National Survey of hjMirfous Waste Treatment, Storarc. Disposal,
and Recycling FacilitU?. (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Har..\rctovis Waste Generators
Biennial report/scat* reporting requirements
California hazardous d.->ta base
>: Petroleum refinery dar.» Kim- {PRDB)
No-migration pecitier.*.
Comments from the prcp^ned rule
Organic Toxicity Sur^'.'
Basis for F037 and F033 vaste «*».? Str.ition;
EPA used data from the «:.^w sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
FQ37 and F038 waste esticates'
FOi/ (routine) - 482 ror.a/vr
F03S (routine) - 9 tor.s/>r
-------
F037 AKD P03 8 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AtfD TRACKING SHEET
Facility 96
Data sources available:
Petroleujc refinery vis i cs/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous WVistr- Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/statf reporting requirements
California hazardo_:5 vasre data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRD3)
No-migration petitions
Comments frora the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Sir.vy
Basis for F037 and FOflS waste estimation:
EPA used data froa the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste esticate?:
F03? (routine) - 45 tens/yr
F03S (routine) - 10 tens 'yr
-------
Pacility # 96
Crude capacity: 11,000 barrelr./d.tv1
Wastewater flow: 126,000 gallonr./Uay*
K waste generation:
K0-*S: H totir./vrar3
KOSlr ]u i cms/year3
Assumptions :
Facility Group 44
K051 composition: 65 percent water. 1 j percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
ve ight5
API separator solids removal » If uicncy: 50 percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
DAF unit solids removal effic icnev: 50 percent6
DAF unit oil removal efficif v; 85 percent6
Estimation:
Solids in the API sludge (K051):
Solids in API influent vastevntf
Solids In API effluent vastewat
Oil in API sludge (K051): (
Oil in API influent wastewater:
Oil in API effluent wastewater:
Solids in neutralizing tank ir.f
(0.2 x
(2 . 8 lons/v
* ff . } - 5.6
cr: 5.0 tons/yr
0,15 y. H tons/y:
f?.l tons/v
cff.) - 2.S
2.H tons/yr
iuent. (5.6
waste
tank
t i me
Solids removal in neutralizing tank (F038):
FOBS sludge from neutralizing tank clean out:
Solids in F£T influent wastewater.
Solids removal in FET (F027):
(7
.5 tons/y
Etevater)
lids sett
r>idence t
fluent wa
tons/yr
5 solids
5 tons/yr
or.s/yr) - 2.8 tons/yr
r) / (0.5 API solids rciroval
tons/yr
• 2.8 tons/yr -2.3 tons/yr
r) - 2.1 tons/yr
r) / (0.75 API oil removal
tons/yr
• 2.1 tons/yr - 0.7 tons/yr
tons/yr solids in API influent
water) / (1 - 0.75 neutralizing
solid removal based on settling
calculations11) - 7.h tons/vr
7.5 tons/yr solids in
neutralizing tank influent -
5.6 tons/yr solids in
neutralizing tank effluent -
1.9 tons/yr solids settling in
neutralizing tank
(1.9 tons/yr solids settling
in tank) / (0.2 fraction of
solids in tank sludge12) - 9.5
tons/yr F038 sludge from
neutralizing tank clean out
r solids in FET effluent
/ (1.0 - 0.5 fraction of
ling based on 30 min.9
irce) - 15 tons/yr solids in
stewater
solids in influent wastewater -
in FET effluent wastewater -
solids settling in FET
-------
F037 sludge from FET clean out: (7.5 tons/yr solids settling in FED /
(0,2 fraction of solids in FET sludge50) -
37,5 tons/yr F037 sludge from FET clean
out
Oil in DAF float (K048): (0.7 tons/yr oil in API effluent) x (0.85 DAF
oil removal efficiency) - 0.6 tons/yr
Solids in DAF effluent wastewater: 2.8 tons/yr from API separator - (2.3
tons/yr x 0,5 DAF solids removal eff.) -
1.4 tons/yr
Oil in DAF effluent wastewater: (0.7 tons/yr) x (1 - 0.S5 oil removal
efficiency) - 0.1 tons/yr
Amount of F037 sludge from annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
baseJ on refineries with known cower clean out quantities):
Solids loading of refinery: (8 tons/yr K048 + 14 tons/yr K051)/
126,000 gallons/day - 0,0001746
Sewer clean out amount: 0.0001746 x 260 acres land area of
refinery x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for
solids 1oad.n£ of 1.0 calculated from
known refinery) - 7 tons/yr
-------
'?b
Wastewater Treatment System
V.V'-Li U t» I
Rkwkk) Ct I
cm**
Qwpetdl
' Em J Urn
! DtMUy]
Advtviul Prooe»«g
¦ IQ WT
larfci 12 ft U
H*SO
IDA* mmI)
i:-.> Pi t;***:
Soporilor -:.
iiSi«*2CT!t
y.l'.f.'T.i;:;
hhhtMadfrmS-.:
Otorrm./n •
; ".h" w«y*y-.
;i.:'&apeftt!kn ]
*f,WT
mubeLieloR ;>.
fl«dck»i •
i ftO Wl
Q
US 5 4
0tfs4«
0»;>o>aJ
Giftlft
aspGIMi
IU ?.'*>
UfU-
o
a
w
li
to
-------
P037 AND PQ3 8 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USB AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility if: 97
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits voluntary submission
x National. Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous U'aste Generators
Biennial report st.-,re reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data b.ir.c- (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments frois the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 vaste estimation:
EPA used data froa the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
FQ37 *nd F038 vaste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 3*1 tons/yr
F038 (routine) - 105 tons/yr
-------
P037 AND P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility H: 98
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission -
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Dispos
iiP.d Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous. Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refir.ery data base (PRDB)
No-rtigration petitions
Consents froa the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 ar.d PO>8 waste estimation :
EPA used data frenj the above sources because the refiner*.* did no
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 vaste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 4,896 tons/yr
-------
Facility * 98
Crude capacity: 220,000 barreIs/day'
Wastewater flov: 1.08 Billion gal ions/day2
K waste generation;
K048 : 40.000 tons/year (reported)
K051: 176 tons/year2
Assumptions:
Facility Croup 4'
FET sludge composition (F03 7 ); 0 percent oil. 20 percent solids by
weight1®
F037 composition: 65 percer.t water, 10 percent oil, and 25 percent solids by
we ight5
F03S composition: 82 percent water, 13 percent oil, and 5 percent solids by
weight5
K048 composition: 32 percer.t water. 13 percent oil, and 5 percent solids by
we ight5
K0i9 composition: 40 percer.t water. 48 percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
weight5
K0S1 comporicion: 65 percent water. 13 percent oil. and 20 percent solids by
weight5
API separator so! ids removal e f f {c i cncy : 50 percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
DAF unit solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
DAF unit oil removal efficiency: S5 percent6
Oil in the API skimming (to slop oil system): 50 percent5
Solids settling in FET and mixing tank: 50 percent9
Slop oil removal sludge (K049) was not reported in the PRDB; however, a K049
generation rate of 334 tons/yr is estimated based on 1.38 metric tons/yr per
1,000 b/sd of refinery capacity®
Estioation:
Solids in the API sludge (KG51): (0.2 x 176 tons/yr) - 35.2 tons/yr
Solids in the API skinning (removed as K049): (0,12 x 334 tons/yr) - 40.1
tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 40.1 tons/yr + 35.2 tons/yr - 75.3
tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (75.3 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids resoval
eff.) - 151 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 151 tons/yr * 75.3 tons/yr - 75.3 tons/yr
Quantity of API skimming: (0.52 K049 water & solids content) x 334
tons/yr) / (1.0 - 0.5 oil in API skimming) - 347
tons/yr
Oil in API skinning: 347 tons/yr x 0.5 - 174 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051); (0.15 x 176 tons/yr) - 26.4 tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator: 26,4 tons/yr + 174 tons/vr - 200 tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: (200 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal
eff.) - 267 tons/yr
-------
Oil
in API effluent wastewater
• 67 tons/yr • 200 tons/yr - 67 tons/vr
FET #2 influent solids.
FET #2 solids removed:
FET <>2 effluent solids:
FET F03? sludge:
75.3 tons/yr
75.3 tons/vr x 0.5 solids removal - 37.7 tons/yr
7 5.3 tons/yr • 3 7.7 tons/yr « 3 7,7 tons/vr
37? tons/yr / 0.2 solids composition - 1S°
tons/vr F037
FET if I effluent solids:
FET //I Influent solids:
FET ill solids renuved:
FET F03? sludge:
1H lons/yr
151 tons/yr / (1 • 0.5 solids removal) - 302
t onr./yr
102 tons/yr x 0.5 solids removal - 151 tons/yr
151 tons/vr , 0,2 solids composition - 735
tons/yr F03 7
Solids removed in DAF: 37.7 tons/yr influent x 0.5 solids removal efficiency
- 13.9 tons/yr
DAF solids effluent; ' 37.7 tons/yr - 18-9 cons/yr - 18.9 tons/yr
)il removed in DAF: 67 tons/yr influent x 0.S5 oil removal efficiency - 57
cons 'vr
DAF oil effluent: 67 'n/vr - 57 tons/yr - 10 tons/yr
Mixing tank solids influent: 18.9 cons/yr
Mixing tank solids removed- 18.9 tons/yr x 0.5 solids removal - 9.-'* tor.s/yr
Mixing tank F037 generated: 9.4 cons/yr solids removed / 0.25 solids
traction - 37.6 tons/yr F037
Amount of F037 sludge frorr annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinery: (40,000 tons/yr DAF float + 334 tons/yr
K049 + 176 tons/yr K0S1) / 1,08 million
gallons/day - 0.0375
Sewer clean out artount: * 0.0375 x 733 acres land area of refinery x
143.7 tons/(vr/acre) (for solids loading
of 1.0 calculated from known refinery) -
3950 tons/yr
-------
>
Api I-
V,
/
<(pi
:(r
/kOFl_jL—
SLOP
; Oil
4^
f er
IAF
T
FoSI
>1/
ft)2>8
7TEzf$T"
Takk.
IT
fos&
To
Unj
-------
M1IW (REFINERY "1 WASTEWATER)
hw (icat exchanger bundle cleanings)
LUUALIZAl ion
hw/ nhw
r
HW (SPENT CAUSTIC)
NHW (REFINERY *2 WASTEWATER)
NHW iFILfliATE,
I ¦
oecanteo mater
AND CLAIRF1ED
WATER)
NHW (EFFLUENT) TO NPOCS
DISCHARGE
NHW/HW • •>
NHW
~ REFINERY
/
WASTEWATER
treatment
PLANT
nhw iocwateheq si.unr.t;>
orrsirE
SEWER
/SYSTEM
HW (Kir.H pH)
HW ILQW pH)
ALKYLAT ION
PLANT
NEUTRALIZATION
HW (HIGH pH)
HW CLOW pH)
POLYMER
NEUTRALIZATION
HW C^WATCREO SLUOCF!
0FF31TE
REUSE AS FUEL
ACCUMULATION
HW
IN
HW
CONTAINERS
OfTGlTf-
•
EXEMPT FROM
tiCRA PERMITTING
-------
K> REFINERY SEWER
NHW
THICKENING
30WT
TANK 10
HW (THICKENED A.P.I. SLUOCE)
iCONE TANK I
iw ict.unnr from
HiHLL PARALLEL
I. tCFARAIORSI
iF^A »- F 110)
NHW
FILTRATE
HW CORE BLOW
COAGULATION
63W1
TANK 0
PRESSURE
filtration
4QWT
TANK 1
100-15 I
I F-l! I
FLYASH
PRECOAT
(OEWATEREO COMBINED
A.P.I. SEPARATOR
SLUDGE HW AND
DAF FLOAT)
OFF SITE
DISPOSAL
fO
O
-*>
jj
t>
I'l
ir>
jj
o
if
01
Z
m
in
O
m
c>
y.
o
<•
in
Ui
o ri j- i
mi u i. ,
- t H y] i
CJ
W i? ,
l/l
m
z ¦
m •
w ™ j> 2 ^
o <~
i/5 1
IS '
m o
X T.
-1 *
r\j
i
r-
j
H-^
CT)
l\)
I
O
t>
1
. o
1 o
c
r fn 3>
~ Z ^
? D m
c> ¦
<- z
? o a
CJ to ¦
-------
F037 AKD P03B WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AKD TRACKING SHEET
Facility 99
Data sources available;
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Vast* Treatment, Storage. Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Vastc Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery i base (PRDB)
No-migration petition'.
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 vastc extirpation:
EPA used data frorc the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste escirrater,;
F037 (routine) - 16 tons/yr
F038 (routine) - 71 tons/yr
-------
Facility # 99
Crude capacity: 34,500 barr*1s/day1
Wastewater flow: 190,000 gatlens/day2
K waste generation:
KC>1 "I" tons/year2
Assumpt i nns:
Facility Croup 1L
FD37 composition: 65 percent wafer. 10 percent oil. and 25 percent solids by
weight5
F03S composition: 65 percert water. 10 percent oil, and 25 percent solids by
weight5
K048 composition: 82 percent water. 13 percent oil, and 5 percent solids by
weight5
K049 composition: 40 perctr' water, 48 percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
we ight5
K051 composition: 65 percent : t r . 15 percent oil. and 20 percent solids by
weight5
API separator solids removal <•{t'icier.cy: 50 percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
IAF unit solids removal ef f ic ier.c v: 50 percent6
IAF unit oil removal efficiency; 85 percent6
Oil in the API skimming (to *lop oil system): 50 percent7
Slop oil re nova 1 sludge (K04^> was r.ot reported in the PROS; however, a K049
generation rate of 52 tons., yr is estimated based on 1.38 metric tons/yr per
1,000 b/sd of refinery capacity8
Estimation:
Solids in the API sludge
-------
IAF solids effluerit: 13.6 tons/yr - 6,8 tons/yr - 6.8 tons/yr
Oil removed in IAF: 10.9 tons yr influent x 0.85 oil removal efficiency -
9 . 3 tons -yr
IAF oil effluent: 10." ror.s-vr - 0.3 tons/yr - 1.6 tons/vr
Total solids + oil removed in IAF: 9.3 tons/yr oil + 6.8 tons/yr solids «=¦
15.1 tons/vr
Total IAF float (F03S): (9.3 tons.'yr solids) / (0.13 solids composition) -
1\ .b tons v r
Since most F03? and F03S vaster, exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also 1 and dispose F037 and F038 wastes. Because EPA has
not received notification frop this refinery identifying land-based units
(e.g., surface impoundments * accepting :u~ly identified TC waster;, EPA assu.T.es
"hat L'he surface impoundments have been closed and the functions of the
surface impoundments have hern replaced by tanks. EPA believes that tanks
replacing surface impoundments would be cleaned out routinely to remove
accumulated sludges {which are cor.sidt-rcd routinely generated F037 and F038
wastes). Based on information provided in the TC questionnaire, we estimated
the quantity of wastes generated frorf; these routine tank cleanouts to be on an
average one-third as much as waster, rtnerated from cleanout of surface
impoundments. Calculations : <- r surf;»c<- impoundment cleanout (based on settling
of solids in an impoundment that war. cleaned out every five years on the
average) and for tank cleanouts (bast-d on the calculations for surface
impoundment cleanout) are presented below.
Quantity of sludge generated from. ih*- surface impoundments that have been
closed:
Solids removal in FEP (F037): (0.3 tons/yr solids in influent
war.tewater) x (1.0 FEP solids removal
b.-if;ed on settling time calculations11) -
C.R tons/vr solids settling in FEP
FC37 sludge frora FEP clean out: (f),3 tons/yr solids settling in FEP + 1.6
tons/yr oil settling in FEP) / (0.35
fraction of solids & oil in FEP sludge12)
- 24 tons/yr F03? sludge front FEP clean
out
Quantity of sludge generated from tanks:
24 tons of surface impoundment sludr.e •/, 1/317 - 8 ton/vr of tank sludge.
Amount of F037 sludge from annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries wich known sewer clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinery: (S2 tons/yr K049 + 37 tons/yr K051) /
lfiO,GOO gallons/day - 4,68 x 10*4
Sewer clean out amour.: • 4.68 x 10'4 x 113 acres land area of
refinery x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for
?;o 1 ids loading of 1,0 calculated from
known refinery) - 7.6 tons/yr
-------
i?lcVr
-------
P037 AND PQ38 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
icility «: ICO
tea sources available:
Petroleum refinery vis i: '-/voluntary submission
x Nat icnal Survev of Hazar-inu?; Wa s t e Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Harardour. Waste Generators
Biennial report/state r< forcing requirements
California hazardous -asu data base
x Petroleum refinery ci'-i h.i'.r (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
isis for FP37 and F038 waste e r>: I tn-it. \ on:
EPA used data frorr the abov<- r.ources because the refinery did not
provide eore recent data.
>37 and F038 waste estimates;
F037 (routine) - 99 tons/yr
-------
\
Questionnaire A
General Facility Information
Page 3q
ftPl S
/
3 0
Ha-f 2 o-ritjy-s \jUa j+c
TfQ*_Vmen j0% 5|"oSa-|
T»wAk Qafbmj
Oily Ciller sUije >
Uj*STC~«K-j
A>* =«f- I
La^S-T
-------
P037 AND P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AKD TRACKING SHEET
icility 101
tta sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
ix National Survey of Hazardous Wasco Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous vaste data base
x Petroleum refinery data bast* (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
*sis for F03? and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data,
)37 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 8,747 tons/yr
-------
Facility # 101
Crude capacity: 135,000 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 12.5 rail 1 icr. gallons/day2
K viste generation:
K048: 29,402 tons/year3
K049: 2,482 tons/year3
K051: 11,720 tons/year3
Assumptions:
Facility Group 4
trr. 48 percent oil,
15 percent oil,
K049 composition: 40 percent
weight5
K051 composition: 65 percent water
weight5
API separator solids removal efficiency:
API separator oil removal efficiency:
CPI separator solids removal efficiency:
CPI separator oil removal efficiency:
DAF unit solids removal efficiency:
DAF unit oil removal efficiency:
FET solid removal efficiency:
Oil in the API skinning (to slop oil system)
and 12 percent solids by
and 20 percent solids by
50 percent6
75 percent6
70 percent6
S3 percent6
50 percent6
85 percent6
50 percent9
50 percent7
This facility has a CPI separator but has been reporting CPI sludge as K051,
which is API sludge. For the purpose of this capacity analysis, the CPI
sludge is considered an F037 waste.
Estimation:
Solids in the API sludge (K051): (0.2 x 11,720 tons/yr) - 2,344 tons/yr
Solids in the API skimming (removed as K049): (0.12 x 2,482 tons/yr) » 298
tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 2,344 tons/yr + 298 tons/yr - 2.642
' tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (2,642 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids retroval
eff.) - 5.2S4 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 5,284 tons/yr - 2,642 tons/yr - 2,642
tons/yr
Quantity of API skimming: <0,52 K049 water 6> solids content) x 2,482
tons/yr) / (1.0 - 0.5 oil in API skimming) -
2,531 tons/yr
Oil in API skimming: 2,581 tons/yr x 0.5 - 1,290 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0,15 x 11,720 tons/yr) - 1,75C tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator: 1,758 tons/yr + J,290 tons/yr - 3,048
tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: 3,048 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal
eff.) - 4,064 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 4,064 tons/yr - 3,048 tons/yr - 1,016
tons/yr
-------
Solids in CFI influent vaste-ntos•;
cons/yr
Solids in CFI effluent wastewater:
Oil in C?I influent wastewater:
Oil rexoved in the CPI separator:
Oil in CFI effluent wastewater:
C?I Solids Oil total quanitv;
2,642 cons/yr
2,642 tons/yr - 1.849 tons/yr - 793
tons/yr
1,016 tons/yr
<1.016 tons/yr) x 0.85 - 864 tons/yr
i.016 tons/yr - 864 tons/yr - 152 rons/yr
CPI Sludge (F037): <2.71
DAF influt-r.t Solids; 793 t
DAF influent Oil: 152 z
Oil in DAF float (K048);
Solids in DAF float (K043):
Oil in DAF effluent wastewate
Solids removal in FET (F037>
Solids in FET effluent wastew
F03? sludge from FET clean ou
3.t
or.s
ons
(1
el
(:
tins
Syr
,-yr
S2
1 ic
"3
t
1,849 tons/yr + 864 tons/yr
tons/yr
/yr) / 0.35 - 7.751 tons/yr
2.713
tons/yr) x (0.85 DAF oil
Icncy) - 129 tons/yr
tons/yr) x (0.5 DAF soil
icncy) - 397 tons/yr
(152 tons/yr) x (1 - 0,
c-fficiency) - 23 tons/y
(197 tons/yr solids in
wastewater) x (0,5 FET
based on settling tice
tons/yr solids settling
(397 tons/yr solids in
« 199 tons/yr solids se
199 tons/yr solids in e
(199 tons/yr sclids set
(0.2 fraction of solids
993 tons/yr F037 sludge
removal
ids removal
85 oil removal
r
influent
solids removal
calculations) « 199
in FET
influent wastewater
ttling in FET) -
ffluent wastewater
tlinr, in FET) /
in FET sludge10) -
from FET clean out
Aicount of r037 sludge froa ar.nu.tl refinery sower clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refir.erv. <29,402 tons/vr K048 + 2.482 tons/vr K049
+ 11.720 tons/yr K051)/ 12.5 million
gallons/day - 0.0035
Sewer clean out amount: 0.0035 x 6 acres land area of refinery x
143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading
of 1.0 calculated from known refinery) - 3
tons/yr
-------
ow
-------
UCSTiOM (Jj'Ji "i> CTn..i.eu Cii>C.\AC*A*>"K. O* "Soi_tC> Vl«.^T5 Fnciuitv (. P H.T9M ioO*)
rcco cvhl«t
r i-itt.
0 a o,«0
ililil
Deot, Ota t
Host > *"!>¦*•
pooi D»»y
Kf S I ,K6 si
I^OOO 6/y
^.">01, poof, KOS'Zl
t*.<*.Jc. 2-/'!'•>-d*-i •
I affC 6/^4 tJtb*)
Vi1CO tMkwVit
r Li HG
Co^O»t»0-4*«-50
TTTT
3 Tfd
Tm&< 4. '1
F'Ut*
irt,--£. *-/•
? /„ ^ o o a o r>,% <
K r s I
G /
r
,4 aooA C/ir ^hK/J
-------
PC37 AKB P03B WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
facility t>: 102
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary subraission
x Sational Survey of Hazardous V.-iste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state rt-porting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PP.D5)
"o-cigration petitions
Comtsnts from Che proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 wast* estimation:
EPA used data froo the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F03S waste estiaatt-s:
F037 (routine) - 312 tens/yr
-------
\
Questionnaire A
General Facility Information
Page 30
\
(
ftPl
TVnk floffeiMj
-> l
3 A
\aJq» s*|"c
Tfe».Vmen^r j 0 >s fas«4
U>4JTC««"f^"
A»X $.(¦ j*~
w
Is K"
^tutuL,
^ Z.cAC'%*"rC
Oily Hxclionjer sl^€"—>
Lo-^5-"Pa-f>"N
L Tin. fe &//•
foofjtts U.Ki t- Ol\y Ski)}
"J
J
C
-------
P037 AS2 f038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS;
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility «: 101
Data sources available:
Petroleum refiner*.* v ; ~. • t <. voluntary submission
x National Survey c: •M.-rttV.ous Treatment, Storage. Lisposa
and Recycling Facil;?t«". \7SDR survey)
x National Survey cf Waste Generators
Biennial report/stat*- reporting requirements
California hazarcou-. w,r-to data base
x Petroleum refine:"' Kir.c (PRD5)
No-migration petit
Comments from the p r 'poMV. rule
Organic Toxicity Survry
Basis for F037 and F03S vastr *-stJjir it ion:
EPA used data from the .»t>ovc sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent da:.i
F037 and F038 waste estirr.-irf--.
F037 (routine) - S.7-" ton-, vr
-------
Facility # 101
Crude capacity: 155,000 barrel's day?
Vastewater flow; 12.5 sillier, rallor.s dav2
K0-*£: 2°.-*02 tor.s/year3
KC-? . 2.-82 cons, year*
K051' 11. "20 tor.s.-vear5
K waste gene ration:
Assuror ions:
Facility Group 4
KCU9 corr.pos i c ion: 40 percent va:cr, 48 percent oil. sr.d 12 t-orcc-r.: so 1 ids by
ve ighc*
K051 composition: 65 percc-r.t w.-, t %. r, 13 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
•-•eight5
API separator solids removal efficiency: 50 percent*
API separator oil recoval efficiency: ~3 percer.:6
CPI separator solids remove 1 * f £ ;c ier.cy : "0 percent5
CPI separator oil recoval efficit-r.cy: Si percent6
DAF unit solids resoval efficiency: 50 percent6
DAF unit oil rerroval efficicr.cy • S3 percent6
FET solid removal efficiency: 50 percent*
Oil ir. the API skixmng (to slop oil system"* : 50 percent'
This facility has a CPI separator but has been reporting C?I sludge as K051,
vhich is API sludge. For the purpose of this capacity analysis, the CPI
sludge is considered an F03? waste.
Estimation:
Solids in the API sludge (K051): (0.2 x 11.720 tons/yr) - 2,344 tor.s/yr
Solids in the API skirrjting (resoved as K049): (0.12 x 2.4S2 tor.s/yr) - 293
tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 2,344 tor.s/yr + 29S tons/yr - 2.642
tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (2 ,642 .tor.s/yr) / (0.5 API solids removal
eff.) - 5,2S4 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater; 5.284 tons/yr - 2,642 tons/yr - 2,6-2
tons/yr
Quantity of API skimming: (0.52 K049 water & solids content) x 2.4S2
tens/yr) / (1.0 - 0.5 oil in API skimming) -
2,581 tons/yr
Oil ir. API skirting: 2.581 tons/yr x 0.5 - 1.290 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0.15 x 11,720 tons/yr) - 1.758 tons/yr
Oil rexoved in the API separator: 1,758 tons/yr + 1,290 tons/yr - 3.04S
tons/yr
Oil ir. API influent wastewater: 3,043 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal
eff.) - 4.064 tor.s/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 4,064 tons/vr • 3,048 tons/yr - 1.016
tons/yr
-------
Sol ids in CPI influent wastewater
tons/yr
Solids in CPI effluent wastevater:
Oil in CPI influent wastewater:
Oil removed in the CPI separator:
Oil in CPI effluent wastewater:
CPI Solids & Oil total quanitv
2,642 tons/yr
2,6*42 tons/yr - 1,849 tons/yr « 793
tons/yr
1,016 tons/yr
(1,016 tons/yr) x 0,83 - 864 tons/vr
1,016 tons/yr - 86'* tons/yr - 152 tons/yr
1,849 tons/yr + 864 tons/yr - 2,713
tons/yr
CPI Sludge (F037); {2,713 :cns-yr) / 0.35 - 7t?51 tons/yr
DAF influent Solids: 793 tons/yr
DAF influent Oil: 152 tons yr
Oil in DAF float (K048): il52 tans/yr. x (0.S5 DAF oil rerroval
efficiency) - 129 tons/yr
Solids in DAF float (K04S); v"03 tons/yr) x (0,5 DAF soilids removal
efficiency) - 397 tons/yr
(152 tons/yr) x <1 - 0.85 oil removal
efficiency) - 23 tons/yr
(397 tons/yr solids in influent
wastewater) x (0.5 FET solids rercoval
based on settling tin;e calculations) - 199
tons/yr solids settling in FET
(397 tons/yr solids in influent wastewater
- 199 -tons/yr solids settling in FST) -
199 tons/yr solids in effluent wastewater
(199 tons/yr solids settling in FET) /
(0 2 fraction of solids in FET sludge10) -
993 tons/yr F037 sludge from FET clean out
Oil in DAF effluent wastewater:
Solids removal in FET (F037):
Solids in FET effluent wastewace
F037 sludge from FET clean out;
Asount of F037 sludge froa annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer tlcart out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinery:
Sewer clean out arcour.t:
(29,402 tons/yr K048 + 2,482 tons/yr K04.9
4- 11.720 tons/yr KQ51)/ 12.5 trillion
gallons/day - 0,0035
0,0035 x 6 acres land area of refinery x
143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading
of 1.0 calculated from known refinery) - 3
tons/yr
-------
>"-» iiuaj •
o
o
CO
<$
o
-iow
PR.QOK.S _
Vjnm (i^Arc^.
NMuJ
v=»e>jct«M_ k-AciuTy vJ>oc icwSM.M'ic
oL t»> t.vrc . Tfc &t»aS ¦
; OFV-sit* "T< \}T«a
DMMtlOO
'Piciea o,t&
<
*4 H-*J
Maw
Sou 10
nwu) / Uw
(
OFFtaG
-------
€)uuS"Tio»4 CS" t;T«.t3 VJ*,V"Cf Pnch.itv C^ 't-f«/wtioO^
Fcco C1.1w.y4T
Ploet
j-iemni? £5/^ *JffaO
in.—4 *4-
? Zoo O O r> 6/yv.
>-0 5 1
31. own £./ hfUjJ
l « o (, /cyxs
KfS I «
-4 f>* &/y
Oiu(lo ASCovB*^
4 U 30& O
ii>W
I.
- *'3f S"S"
P?VtC«t.
«€«
-------
F037 AND F038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility tf: 102
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery vis1cs/voluntary submission
y. National Survey of H&tnrdous Waste Treatment, Storage. Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Ha-a rdous Waste- Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base CPRDB)
No-migration petiticr.s
Comments from the prepo?;
-------
Facility # 102
Crude capacity: 78,94? barrels day*
Wastewater flow: 10,000 gal Ion.-: ¦ dav*
Assurrot ions:
Facility Group 44
F03 / composition: 65 percent t*r. 10 percent
oil
, and
25 percent
solids bv
weight5
F038 composition: 65 percent water. 10 percent
oil
. and
2 5 percent
solids by
weight5
K048 composition: 82 percent vatt*r, 13 percent
oil
, and
5 percent •
solids by
weight5
K049 composition: 40 percent v:»:t-r. 45 percent
oil
, ar.d
12 p t " l c e n r.
solids by-
weight5
K051 composition: 65 percent 15 percent
oil
, and
20 percent
solids by
weight5
CPI separator solids remov.. 1 tfricicncy:
70
percent6
CPI separator oil removal efficiency:
65
percent6
Oil in the CPI skimming (to slop oil system):
50
percent7
Slop oil removal -sludge (K0-:' was r.rt reported in the PRDB: hovrv^r. a K049
generation rate of 53 tons -'vr : :• « ; irrated based on 1.38 metric tons/yr per
1.000 b/sd of refinery capacity5
CPI sludge was not reported in the T?,Z5; however, a sludge generation rare of
84 tons/yr is estimated based cvr. 1 . JS metric tor.s/yr per 1,000 b/sd of
refinery capacity8
Estimation:
.taount of F03? sludge froz annual refinery sever clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with kr-c-n si-vor clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refir.vrv (S3 tons/yr KC4? + 84 tons/vr CPI sludge)
/ 10.000 gallons/day - 0.0137
Sewer clean out amount: 0,0137 x 116 acres land area of refinery :<
143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading
of 1.0 calculated from known refinery) -
228 tons/yr
-------
Ttectss
c?i.
?
-------
P037 AND PC38 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA OSS AND TRACKING SHEST
Facility »: 103
Data sources available:
Petroleuic refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Vaste Treatment. Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities C7SDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Vastr Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleura refinery c.ita base (PRDB)
Ko-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Sasis for F03? and F038 waste est irr.it jon:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F03? (routine) - 175 tor.s/yr
-------
F037 AKD P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AKD TRACKING SHEET
acility f>: 104
sat a sources available:
Petroleum refinery vis its/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requi retrents
California hazardous vasce data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the propose d rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
¦asis for F037 and F038 waste esc i rrn t ion :
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
*037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 3,307 cons/yr
-------
P037 AND F038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA CSE AND TRACKING SHE5T
Facility it '¦ 105
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardour. Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous va;.te data base
x Petroleum refinery d/ua ba.M* (PRDB)
___ No-migration petitions
Consents frora the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F033 was»< estire.-it Ion;
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
FQ37 and F038 waste estimates;
F037 (routine) - 1,302 cons/yr
F038 (routine) - 43 tons/yr
-------
F037 AND P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SKEET
Facilicy fK 106
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits voluntary submission
x National Survey of Waste Treatment, Storage, Dispos
and Recycling Faci 1: r ic-s t 7SDR survey)
x National Survey of Har.trdcus Vaste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requiregents
California hazardous v.iscc data base
x Petroleum refinery diz* base (PRDS)
No-migration petit;
Comments from the proposed rule-
Organic Toxicity Sur.*ev
Basis for F037 and F038 wastr- rsrizr.rion:
EPA used data from the- above sources because the refinery did no
provids more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates;
F037 (routine)
- 71 to:
-------
Facility # 106
Crude capacity: 31,500 barrels/day'
Wastewater flow: 64,000 gallons/day2
K vaste generation:
K04S: 124 tons/year2
K049: 43 cons/year2
K051: 76 cons/year2
Assujpttoris:
Facility Croup 2'
Clarification sludge composition (F037): 20 percent solids by weight5
F037 composition: 65 percent v.->:.or, 10 percent oil, .md 25 percent solids by
we ight5
K048 composition: 82 percent vater, 13 percent oil, and 5 percent solids by
weight5
K049 composition: 40 percent -.-ator, 48 percent oil. and 12 percent solids by
•-•eight5
K051 composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent: oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
AFI separator solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
DAF unit solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
DAF unit oil removal efficiency: 85 percent6
Clarification tank solids removal efficiency: 25 percent9
Clarification tank oil removal efficiency: 0 percent9
Oil in the API skimming (to slop oil system): 50 percent7
Estimation:
Clarification tank influent solids: 10 5 tons/yr
Clarification tank solids removed: 10.5 tons/yr x 0.25 solids removal - 2.65
tons/yr
Sludge from clarification tanks contain an average of 20 percent solids13;
therefore, the F03? waste volume accumulating in the basin is estimated at
(2.65 tons/yr) / (0.20) - 13 tons/yr.
Axcour.t of F037 sludge from annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):15
Solids loading pf refinery: (124 tons/yr K048 + 48 tons/yr K049 + 76
tons/yr K051) / 2 million gallons/day -
0,0039
Sewer clean out artount: 0.0039 x 104 acres land area of refinery x
143.7 tons/(vr/acre) (for solids loading
of 1.0 calculated from known refinery) -
57.9 tons/yr
-------
Taxes*
, •1,1 X
ATM
V-
IMF
v-oft
4tlo(o
CtAKlF.
b!4£4MflS,£
T/rNK.
ft#
-------
P037 AKD P03 8 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility ••••. 107
Data sources available;
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Vaste Trearrrent. Storage. Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities iTSDR survc-y*
x National Survey of Hazardous * as:- Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous vaste data base
>: Petroleum refinery data base (?RjE;
No-migration petit:-:.n
Comments fro,? the proposed rule
Organic Tonicity Survey
Basis for FQ37 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data frorr the above sources because the refinery did not
provide rcore recent data.
F037 and FQ38 vaste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 8 tons/yr
F038 (routine) - 36 tons/yr
-------
Pacility # 107
Crude capacitv: 32,000 barrels/day^
Wastewater flow: 410,000 gallons/day2
K waste generation:
F03S: 64 tons/year (reported)
K051: 2 tons/year2
Assumptions: •
Facility Group 54
F037
compos i tion:
65 percent
we ight5
wa t e r,
10
percent
oil.
and
25 percent solids by
F038
composition:
82 percent
we ight*
wa t e r,
13
percent
oil.
and
5 percent solids by
CO
o
composition:
82 percent
weight*
wa t e r,
13
pe rcenl
oil.
and
5 percent solids by
K049
composition:
40 percent
weight5
water,
48
percent
oil.
and
12 percent solids bv
K051
composition:
65 percent
we ight5
water,
15
pe rcent
oil.
and
20 percent solids by
API separator solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
IAF unit solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
IAF unit oil removal efficiency: S3 percent6
Oil in the API skimming (to slop oil system): 50 percent7
Slop oil removal sludge (K04?) was not reported in the PRD3; however, a K049
generation rate of 49 tons/yr is estimated based on 1.33 metric tons/yr per
1,000 b/sd of refinery capacity8
Estimation:
Solids in the API sludge (K051): (0.2 x 2 tons/yr) - 0.4 tons/yr
Solids in the API skimming (removed as K049): (0.12 x 49 tons/yr) - 5.9
tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 5.9 tons/yr + 0.4 tons/yr - 6.3
tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (6.3 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids removal
eff.) - 12.6 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 12.6 tons/yr - 6.3 tons/yr - 6.3 tons/yr
Quantity of API skimming:, (0.52 K049 water 6» solids content) x 49 tons/yr)
/ (1.0 - 0.5 oil in API skimming) - 51 tons/yr
Oil in API skimming: 51 tons/yr x 0.5 - 25.5 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0.15 x 2 tons/yr) - 0.3 tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator: 0.3 tons/yr + 25.5 tons/yr - 25.8 tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: (25.8 tons/vr) / (0.75 API oil removal
eff.) - 34.4 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 34.4 tons/yr - 25.3 tons/yr - 8.6 tons/yr
-------
Solids removed in IAF: 6.3 cans vr influent >: 0.5 solids rc-iroval efficiency -
3.2 tons-vr
IAF solids effluent: 6.2 tons/vr - 3.2 tons/yr - 3.1 tons/yr
Oil removed in IAF: 8.6 tons, vr influent x 0',S3 oil removal efficiency -
7.3 tor.s.'vr
IAF oil effluent: S .6 tons -vr • 7,3 tons/yr - 1.3 tons/vr
IAF float (F03S): (~.3 tons vr oil ) / 0,3 solids & oil composition in
F033 - :£,3 tons/yr
Since reost F037 and F038 w a s r e s exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also 1 And di rr-ose F037 and F038 wastes. Because E?A has
not received notification fror rhir, refinery identifying land-based units
(e.g., surface impoundments') accepting r.v v I y identified TC wastes , EPA assumes
that the surface impoundments have le« n ¦ lesed and the functions of the
surface impoundments have been r< placet bv tanks. EFA believes that tanks
replacing surface irapoundtent s wId be cleaned out routinely to rerrovc
ac circulated sludges (which arc considered routinely generated F0:7 and F033
wastes). Based on information provided in the TC questionnaire. ve estirrated
the quantity of wastes generated fro? these routine tank cleanouts to be on an
average one-third as rruch as wastes generated frcs cleanout of surface
impoundments. Calculations for surfarc- i.Tpouncrrer.t cleanout (based on settling
of solids in an impoundment that w.-*f, cleaned out every five years on the
average) and for tank cleanouts , har.ed on the calculations for surface
impoundment cleanout) are presented below.
Equalisation basin vclurte: IT-.. > cu.ft.2
Flow - .'.00,000 gallons/day - 53,«:0 r;:. ft. /day
Hydraulic retention time (H?.T > : ] 7-'«. 000 cu.ft. / 53,480 cu.£t,/day - 2.3
days - 55.6 hours
Settling calculations show that the HET is sufficient for complete settling of
solids and rerroval of oil.
Solids and oil settling in basin. 3.1 tons/yr solids + 1.3 tons/yr oil - U.U
tcr.s/vr
Drag-out sludge from basir.s and iirpoundTents contain an average of 65 percent
water13; therefore, the F037 vasto volume accumulating in the basin is
estimated at (A.U tons/yr) / \\ - 0 65) - 12.6 tons/yr.
Quantity of sludge generated fro- tanks:
12.6 tons of surface impoundment sludge x 1/31? - 4.2 ton/yr of tank sludge.
Amount of F037 sludge from annual refinery sewer clean out iextrapolation
based on refineries with known s.ver clean out quantities);15
-------
Solids loading of refinery: t-9 tons/yr K049 + 2 tons/yr K051 +
:or.s/yr F03S)/ 400.000 gallons/dav
0.0002875
Sewer clean out amount: 0.0002875 x 107 acres land area of
refinery x 143.7 cons/(yr/acre) (fo
;.olids loading of 1.0 calculated fr
known refinery) - 4.4 tons/yr
-------
r "
m
m .
/
i
ry
Star
6iu
^K05~t
1
^FoSS
# Ij'7
re?
—t
•SCLlb^
F£P
ft>Kb
IT
-------
P037 AK3 FC30 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility : ICS
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visi;s/voluntary submission
k National Survey of Ha-ardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities tTSDP, survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous -,xszv data base
:< Petroleum refinery data b.i«;e (PROS)
No-migration peci::cn*!
Consents from the propost-d rule
Organic Toxicity Surv. v
Basis for F037 and F038 waste <>st '.rr.-it ion:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did r.ot
provide r?.ore recent data
FQ37 and F038 waste estimates:
F03? (routine) - 995 tor.s/vr
-------
Facility # 1C8
Crude capacity: 4,500 barrels/d.n-1
Wastewater flow: 10.000 gal '.cr-.?: d.n
K waste generation:
Assumptions:
Facility Group 64
F037 composition: 65 percent v
weight5
K048 corrpos i t ion: S2 percent -
weight5
K049 composition: 40 percent v
weight5
K051 composition: 65 percent v
we ir.ht5
OWS solids removal efficient--.--
OWS oil removal efficiency:
Oil in the OWS skimming (tc
Slop oil removal sludge (KC-.:
generation rate of 7 tons/yr
1,000 b/sd of refinery capac:
OWS separator sludge was not
generation rate of 11 tons/yr
1,000 b/sd of refinery capaci
Estig3tion:
Solids removed in OWS;
Solids influc-nt to OWS:
Solids effluent front OWS:
Quantity of OWS skinning:
IS l*S
i c f :
.,,a
. 10 percent oil, and 25 percent solids by
. 13 percent oil, and 5 percent solids by
. -S percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
. 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
50 percent6
75 percent6
:1 system): 50 percent7
not reported in the PRDB; however, a KQ49
:i™ated based on 1,33 rrecric tons/vr per
ivi in the PRDB: however", a OWS si Cure
titrated based on 2.2 metric tons/yr pet
Oil in OWS skinning:
Oil in OWS sludge (F037):
Oil removed in OWS:
Oil influent to OWS:
Oil effluent front OWS:
Total oil & solids removed ir
Total F037 sludge front OWS:
11 tor.s/yr x 0.25 CWS sludge solids fraction -
2 7 tons/yr
i' ' tons/yr / (0.5 OWS solids removal
r-ff:osoncy) - 5.4 tons/yr
:j •"« :ons/yr influent * 2.7 tons/yr removed - 2.7
tflj'.s 'yv effluent
52 K0^9 water & solids content) x 6.8
lon.syr) / (1.0 - 0.5 oil in OWS skimming) - 7.1
: ons .'vr
7 1 :ons/yr x 0,5 - 3.6 tons/yr
<3 1 x 2.7 tons/yr solids) / (0.25 solids
f f i'.tont) - 1.1 tons/yr
tons/vr + 3.6 tons/yr - 4.7 tons/yr
. J ons/yr oil removed / (0.75 OWS oil removal
<¦'. firicncy) - 6.3 tons/yr
f. 3 :ons/yr - 4,7 tons/yr - 1.6 tons/yr
Y-S. 4.7 tons/yr oil + 2.7 tons/yr solids - 7,4
tons/yr
> ~ tons/yr solids) / 0.25 solids and oil
composition - 10.9 tons/yr F037 generated
-------
Since most F037 and F038 wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC vasees also land dispose F037 and F03S wastes. Because EPA has
not received notification froir this refinery identifying land-based units
(e.g., surface impoundments} accepting newly identified TC wastes, EPA assumes
that the surface impoundments have been closed ar.d the functions of the
surface impoundments have been replaced by tanks. EPA believes that tanks
replacing surface impcundnjer.es would be cleaned out routinely to remove
accumulated sludges (which are considered routinely generated F037 and F02S
wastes). Based on information provided in the TC questionnaire, we estimated
the quantity of wastes generated from these routine tank clear.cuts to be on an
average one-third as such as wastes genera: vd frors cleanout of surface
impoundments. Calculations for .surface impoundment cleanout (based on settling
of solids in an impoundment that was cleaned out every five years on the
average) and for tank cleanouts.(based on the calculations for surface
impoundment cleanout) are presented below.
Quantity of sludge generated from the surface impoundments that have been
closed:
Amount of F waste sludge from upstream surface impoundment:
45,738 sq.ft area of the surface irrpoundir-enc x 2 ft depth of the
sludge14 x 63 lb/cu.ft density of the sludge - 5,762,938 lb = 2,881 tons
Downstream surface impoundment :
SI influent solids: 2.7 tor.s/y r
SI influent oil: 1.6 tons/yr
Area of SI: 3.82 acres
Volume of SI: 3,82 acres x 20 feet depth x 3.295 x 105 gal per sere-foot -
24.9 million gallons
(assuir.es a 20 foot average depth of SI)
Hydraulic residence time: 24,9 million gallons / 0.01 million gallons/day
» 2400 days
Settling calculations show that the KRT is sufficient for complete settling of
solids and removal of oil.
Solids and oil settling in basin: 2.7 tons/vr + 1.6 tons/yr - 4.3 tons/vr
Drag-out sludge from basins and impoundments contain an average of 65 percent
water15 therefore, the F037 waste volume accumulating in the basin is
estimated at (4.3 tons/yr) / (1 - 0.65)- 12.3 tons/yr.
Quantity of sludge generated from tanks;
2,946 tons of surface impoundment sludge x 1/317 - 9S2 ton/yr of tank sludge.
Amount of F037 sludge from annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinery: ( 7 tons/yr K049 + 0.9 tons/yr OVS
sludge)/ 10,000 gallons/day - 0.00179
-------
Sewer clean out amour.
0,00179 x 13 acres land area of refinery x
t on.i/fyr/acre) (for solids loading of 1.0
calculated frora known refinery) - 3.3
tons/yr
-------
-# I0 $
Low Eye
——y
-------
P037 AND P03 8 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA OSE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility if: 109
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
k National Survey of Haz^rdou', V.-»stv Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilitir-s- t TSDP. survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Vaste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requi tq~.kt.zs
California hazardov waste d/ita b.ise
x Petroleum refinery data base iFRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F03? and F038 waste cstirt.nticn:
EPA used data frora the ahow sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates.
F03? (routine) - 44,360 tons/yr
-------
P037 AND F038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
'acility ?<: 110
)ata sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste- Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous vaste data base
x Petroleum refinery base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Consents from the proposed rule
x Organic Toxicity Survey
Sasis for F03? and F038 caste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more rfecent data.
*037 and FQ38 vaste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 15.997 tons/yr
FG3? (surface impoundments) - 1,000 tons (7/92 • 12/92)
F037 (surface itcpoundeznts) - 1,000 tons £1/93 - 12/93)
F037 (surface impoundments) - 500 tons (1/94 - 6/94)
-------
Facility » 110
Crude capacity: 115,000 barrel-; \Uy'
Wastewater flow; 930.000 gallon,;. dav*
K waste generation:
K04S : . 10 > tons/year5
K051 tons/year5
Assumptions:
Facility Croup 1^
F03? composition: 65 percent v/i:rr. 10 per rent oil, and 25 percent solids by
weight5
K048 composition: 82 percent v.-itrr. 13 percent oil, and 5 percent solids by
weight5
K049 composition: 40 percent '.miit. -*3 percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
weight5
KC51 composition: 65 percent wa:t-r. 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
API separator solids rer.ov^: - I i icicncy: 50 percent6
API separator oil removal el::c tr:vv : 75 percent6
DAF unit solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
DAF unit oil removal efficiency: 85 percent6
Est imaf. ion:
Drag- out sludge from basins and i rr;-ound.-r.cnts contain an average of 65 percent
water: therefor? the KQ37 waste vrlur.* accumulating in the basin is estimated
at (3971 tons/yr) / (1 - 0.6S> - L1 :-*6 tons/yr,
Acount of F waste sludge froc upstrearr surface impoundment:
1,30? sq.ft area of the surface impoundment * 2 ft depth of the sludge *
63 Ib/cu.ft density of the sludge - 164,682 lb - 82 tons
Aicount of F037 sludge fron annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known ncw^r clean out quantities):10
Solids loading of ref ir.erv; \9,193 tons/yr K048 + 24,818 tons/yr K051)
^30,000 gallons/day - 0.0366
Sewer clean out amount: 0.0366 x 871 acres land area of refinery x
143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading
of 1.0 calculated from known refinery) -
*.577 tons/yr
EPA received recent ir.furr.at ion about this facility in the Organic TC
Questionnaire. Based on this ir.t orrration. EPA assumed that the upstream
basins had closed and were replaced by tanks. However, EPA does not have
information that indicates that the sewers have been segregated. Therefore,
EPA assumed that these tanks would generated the same amount of F037 (routine)
waste as the surface irapoundzen:s that have closed. Using information frois
the TC Questionnaire, the EPA was also able to determine the quantity of F037
-------
and FQ38 wastes removed fro= surface impoundments) during the time periods
listed below:
July 1, 1992 • Dec. 31, 1992: 1,000 tons
Jan, 1. 1993 • Dec. 31, 1993: 1.000 tons
Jan. 1, 1994 - June 30, 1994: 500 tons
-------
V
/V H Co
(£?4lue*jt ia UudcrnZouud. o*j)
HHUJ
iw,•(*
K*s i
ZiJtbJL me
(0 /JCe (1/>vco
-------
Tpwi
NtliO ^
(Ccl (KP1 AJO"-
"¦I-1 5(1
j>«••' £r
/Iri.l •*>'
i'ft.'.ijC
7/i?/k15/'4
Ctttiii c
S'v " J c
7^ 7
A///(a)
^ £V'«,ur.'fc( d)(/)
10
c»i
^,0»>,000tr
^^>togJ i,
5^>-r
f\l?t,Usi/t2/)f(o>o
TV»s.«
'/rfukS
U«Jf
m
A If HO
fojrtllttwjf «")
NHU)
KJ <•/
?
avr.
o/V .
St'tucc )
flPX.
Se^/le/ubss
NHt-o
(cu /)/<¦¦<¦)
, «fWT
{lLM>leu» I
6U/?S /cw/7•« T
HUJ
CTjCuj/lfcrfct
3,iy StuJq
twi
ato^fo
'[Qtllhj*1"' |
/n.y
//aJ lutsir
£/>Ar toil
Sfif/lMfc*
CUidyc)
/-•,//<"£ /lt\
-p^zA
T/1kjK 3l
llbt-fU*
ff),% zsr
77mK
Tfijk I
~W>l sifr
Slucjjj c
Z?l,cf''r->f<
'J/hiK L
,0O3 G»
|©«f
Koii
NHu>
"Tire oo/rf
T'/ttoK
^Oi/y SVu.^c)
*' 4 ^. "To*ii
I /1 £
-------
P037 AND P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility «: 111
Data sources available:
PeCroleunj refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage. Disposa
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base* (PRDB1)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule-
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for FQ37 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and FQ38 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 2 cor.s/yr
F038 (routine) - 19 tor.s/yr
-------
Facility # 111
Crude capacity: 11,500 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 360,000 gallons/day2
K waste gene-ration:
K049: 15 cons/year2
K051: 4 tons/year2
Assu-tot ions:
Facility Group 34
F03? composition: 65 percent water, 10 percent oil. and 25 percent solids by
weight5
F038 (IAF float) composition: 82 percent ,.,*ater, 13 percent oil, and 5 percent
solids by weight5
X048 composition: 32 percent water. 13 percent oil, and 5 percent solids by
weight5
K0A9 composition: 40 percent water, 48 percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
weight5
K051 composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
API separator solids re=ov.-.l efficiency: . 30 percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
Oil in the API skinning (to slop oil system): 30 percent7
IAF unit solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
IAF unit oil removal efficiency: 85 percent4
Estinat ton:
Solids in the API sludge (K051): (0.2 x 4 tons/yr) - 0.8 tons/yr
Solids in the API skicaing (removed as K049): (0,12 x 15 tons/yr) - 1.8
tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 1.8 tons/yr + 0.8 tons/yr - 2.6'
tons/yr
Solids "in API influent wastewater: (2,6 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids removal
eff.) - 5.2 tor,s/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 5.2 tons/yr - 2.6 tons/yr - 2.6 tons/yr
Quantity of API skinning: (0.52 K049 water 6> solids content) x 15 tons/yr)
/ (1.0 - 0.5 oil in API skimming) - 15.6 tons/yr
Oil in API skineiing: 15.6 tons/yr x 0.5 - 7.8 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0.15 x 4 tons/yr) - 0.6 tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator: 7.8 tons/yr + 0.6 tons/yr - 8.4 tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: (8.4 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal
eff.) - 11.2 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 11.2 tons/yr - 8.4 tons/yr - 2.3 tons/yr
Oil in IAF float (F038); (2.8 tons/yr) x (0.85 IAF oil removal
efficiency) - 2.4 tons/yr
Solids removed in IAF: (2.6 tons/yr) x 0.5 IAF solids removal - 1.3
tons/yr
Solids in IAF effluent wastewater: 2.6 tons/yr from API separator - 1.3
tons/yr - 1.3 tons/yr
-------
Oil in IAF effluent wastewater: (2.6 cons/yr) x (I - 0.85 oil removal
efficiency) - 0.6 tons/yr
Total IAF flose sludge (F03S): i 2.4 tons/yr oil) / 0.3 solids 6 oil
composition - 18.5 tons/yr
Since most F037 and F038 wastes i-yJiUut the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC vsstcs also land
-------
4- 11
Foil
F6T
API
¦U F
-------
P037 AJC P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DAtA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility »: 111
Dana scurcos available:
Petroi^u.T. refinery vi r» 11 s/vol-iru.ary submission
x National Survey of Har..irdous Vnste Treatment, Storage. Disposal
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of H^r.«rdous mui,:-- Generators
Biennial report/state riportin^ requireser.es
California hazardous w:\r.tc data base
x Petroleum refinery base (PRDB)
Ko-aigration peti t, : *.-«
x Cojwr.*r.ts from the irc?n;.<-d ri-1 <-
Organic Toxicity Smtvc-v
Basis for FOB? and F038 vast" <-•;¦ iirat to:;:
EPA used data from the above r.o :rci-s because the refinery did not
provide sore recent data.
F03? ar.d FQ3B waste est jtr-3t*s:
F037 (rcucir.e) - 2'+fc tcr.s/yr
F037 (surface impoundment r.) - 900 tons (7/92 • 12/92)
FOB7 (surface impoundment) - 750 tens (1/93 ¦ 12/93)
F037 (surface impounder.:..';) - 0 tons (1/?* - 6/9&)
-------
P037 ASO P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility if. 113
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDP. survey)
x National Survev of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 was .e estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide raore recer.t data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 15 tons/vr
-------
Facility # 113
Crude capacity: 5.000 barrels/day'
Wastewater flow: 7000 gallons/day2
K waste generation:
Assuaptions:
Facility Croup 4-
F037 composition: 65 percent w.ucr, 10 percent oil, and 25 percent solids by
weight5 -
F038 composition: 65 percent water, 10 percent oil, and 25 percent solids by
weight5
K048 composition: 32 percent water, 13 percent oil, and 5 percent solids by
weight5
K049 composition: 40 percent water, 48 percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
weight5
K051 composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
CPI separator solids removal efficiency: 70 percent6
CPI separator oil removal efficiency: S5 percent4
Oil in the CPI sktcaing (to slop oil system): :Q percent4
Slop oil removal sludge (KGi?) was not reported in the FRDB; however, a K0&9
generation rate of 7,6 tons/yr is estimated based on 1.3S nsecric tons/yr per
1,000 b/sd of refinery capacity*
CPI sludge (F037) generation was not reported in the PRDB; however, a CPI
sludge generation rate of 12.12 tons/yr is estimated based on 2.2 metric
tons/yr per 1,000 b/sd of refinery capacity8
Estimation:
Amount of F037 sludge froa annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):'5
Solids loading of refinery: (7.6 tons/vr K049 ) / 7,000 gallons/day -
1.09 x lO"*
Sewer clean out amount; 1,09 x 10"5 x 17 acres land area of
refinery x l->3. 7 tons/(yr/acre) (for
solids loading of 1.0 calculated from
known refinery) - 2.7 tons/yr
-------
I fkoa&ti.
1
CPI
—»-
.SloP
dib
UdV)
=$• 11 "2*
R^os&j
F£"P
^&5.UH€ WeT We/THB<.fu5vO
-------
P037 AHD 7038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AMD TRACKING SHEET
Facility #: 114
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
X National Survey of Hazardous 5to Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDP. survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Vast;- Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petit:"is
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 vaste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 6,025 tons/yr
F037 (surface impoundments) - 3067 tons (7/92 - 12/92)
F037 (surface impoundments) - 6134 tons (1/93 - 12/93)
F037 (surface impoundments) - 3067 tons (1/94 - 6/94)
-------
Pacility » 114
Crude capacity: 139,000 barrels/day1
-astevater flow: 3.4 million gallons/day2
K waste generation:
K048; 144 cons/year5
K051: 1,015 cons/year3
Assurcpt Ions:
Facility Group 24
F037 composition: 65 percent vater, 10 percent oil, and 25 percent solids by
weight5
F033 composition: 82 percent vater, 13 percent oil, and 5 percent solids by
weight5
K043 composition: 82 percent vater, 13 percent oil, and 5 percent solids by
weight5
K049 composition: 40 percent water. 4S percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
weight5
K051 composition: 65 percent vater, IS percent oil, and 20 pc-rccnt solids by
we ight5
API separator solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
CPI separator solids removal cf f ic ier.cy: 70 percent6
CPI separator oil removal efficiency: 35 percent6
DAF unit solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
DAF unit oil removal efficiency: 85 percent6
Estimation:
Solids in the API sludge (K051): (0.2 x 1,015 tons/yr) - 203 tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 203 tons/yr
Solids in API influent vastevater: (203 tons/yr) / (0,5 API solids removal
eff.) - 406 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 406 tons/vr - 203 tons/yr - 203 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): {0,15 x 1,015 tons/yr) - 152 tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator: 152 tons/yr
Oil in API, influent wastewater: (152 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal
eff.) - 203 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 203 tons/yr - 152 tons/yr - 51 tons/yr
Solids in CPI effluent:
Solids in CPI influent:
Solids removed in CPI:
Oil in CPI effluent:
Oil in CPI influent:
Oil removed in CPI:
CPI sludge (F037);
406 tons/yr
(406 tons/yr) / (1 - 0,70 solids removal) -
1,353 tons/yr
1,353 tons/yr - 406 tons/yr - 947 tons/yr
203 tons/yr
(203 tons/yr) / (1 - 0.85 solids removal) -
1,353 tons/yr
1,353 tons/yr - 203 tons/yr - 1,150 tons/yr
(94? tons/yr solids + 1,150 tons/yr oil) / 0.35
solid 6 oil fraction - 5,991 tons/yr
Solids removed in DAF:
203 tons/yr x 0.5 DAF solids removal - 102
tons/yr
-------
Solids in DAF effluent wastewater: 203 cons/vr DAF influent - 102 tons/yr
removed - 101 tons/yr
Oil removed in DAF: 51 tons/yr x 0.85 DAF solids removal - 43.4
tons/yr
Oil in DAF effluent wastewater: (51 tons/yr) x (1 - 0.85 oil removal
efficiency) - 7.6 tons/yr
Amount of F waste sludge from upstream surface impoundment:
194,713 sq.ft area of the surface impoundment x 2 ft depth of the
sludge14 x 63 lb/cu.ft density of the sludge - 24.5 mill ion lbs » 12.267
ions
Amount of F037 sludge from annual refinery 5f-wer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean nut quantities):15
Solids loading of refinery: (144 tons/yr K048 + 1,015 tons/yr K051) /
3.4 million gallons/day - 0.00034
Sewer clean out amount: 0.00034 x 706 acres land area of refinery
x 143,7 tons/
-------
00 472 1
GENERAL FACILITY WIDE SCHEMATIC
MISC. K.W.
CONTAINERS
RECYCLABLE HM1ZZ —
'a ' w-s-bcs, do& f
jV
///-tsra es.
1
SO-DAY STORAGE,
TANK £OS. 1-3
-£Ll±
-^DISPOSAL O.-FSIT
37o T r
-> ^od.*•-r
CATALYTIC CRACKING
UNIT .
• »-»•/< 3.
0 .
« Hu
SKIM AND
RECOVERED OILS—>
DAF FLOAT
Lii^
ie>-7Q /
DAF FLOAT
2L
10 7^0 Q
STORAGE SYSTEM #3,
TANK NOS. 21 - 28
S 1~% t1mS + mt~r
tb~7£> I
COKES
UNIT
2£>-r
&)
I T3 /
DAF FLOAT
STORM WATER
HAZ. CWT
SLOWDOWN
AFU
DISCHARGE TO
~>NPDES OR FOTW
-------
OIL SUMP
WET OIL
STORAGE TANK
AFU FLOAT
API SKIM OIL
RECOVERED OILS
DRY OIL
STORAGE TANKS
TO coke-
storage SYSTEM ft 3
C
>
TO COKER
AFU FLOAT STORaS
WILMINGTON 'SECTION
SK—6081 5 s(l/*
-------
3.UQCES
Oil
rccovwco 01 rctusn 10 rem
tan* eonou
SfOluCNf
auocc
SLUDCt
auocc
nunc* uovts auoce rnou oouihoxz stent* to wuffwetew stcixw
crt
SlUOCCS
COKER
UNIT
(XXt P*OOUCT
20
tank Borrow
StOlMCNT
STORAGE SYSTEM II
PITCH TOD ruou VACUUM OA5WCT
1A.UUU. M**UUWU >rMtu
scmojatic
fifl
SLUDG1
O
MISC.
SLUDGES
-------
OIL SUMP
RECOVERED OIL
STORAGE TANKS
7
TC—1
¦S"
AFU FLOAT
SPI SKIM OIL
RECOVERED OILS
STORAGE TANKS
TO 0. COLUMN
TANK
©
CO
»—1
STORAGE SYSTEM t» 1,_
AFU FLOAT STORAGE
SK—60814 9/9/86
-------
P037 AND P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USK AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility /': 115
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposa
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state report inr. requirements
California hazardous vasrv clat.i base
X Petroleum refinery data base (FRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed ruK*
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and FQ38 waste est inn tier.:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide raore recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates;
F037 (routine) - 16 cons/yr
F038 (routine) - 305 cons/yr
-------
F037 AHD F038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AHD TRACKING SHEET
Facility H: 116
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Haz.irdc.us U'ast- Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous vaste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration peticir.r.r.
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F03? (routine) - 8 tons/yr
-------
Pacility # 116
Crude capacity: 62,000 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 410,000 gallons/day2
K waste generation:
K051: 16 tons/year2
Assumptions:
Facility Group 44
F037 composition: 65 percent water, 10 percent oil, and 25 percent solids by
weight5
F038 composition: 65 percent water, 10 percent oil, and 25 percent solids by
weight5
K048 composition: 82 percent water, 13 percent oil. and 5 percent solids by
we ight5
K049 composition: 40 percent water, 48 percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
we ight5
K051 composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
API separator solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
DAF unit solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
DAF unit oil removal efficiency: 85 percent6
Oil in the API skimming (to slop oil system): 50 percent7
Slop oil removal sludge (K049) was not reported in the PRDB; however, a K049
generation rate of 91 tons/yr is estimated based on 1.38 metric tons/vr per
1,000 b/sd of refinery capacity®
Estimation:
Solids in the API sludge (K051): (0.2 x 16 tons/yr) •• 3.2 tons/vr
Solids in the API skimming (removed as K049): (0.12 x 91 tons/yr) - 10.9
N tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 10.9 tons/yr + 3.2 tons/yr - 14.1
tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (14.1 tons/vr) / (0.5 API solids removal
eff.) - 28.2 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 28.2 tons/yr - 14.1 tons/yr - 14.1 tons/yr
Quantity of API skimming: (0.52 K049 water & solids content) x 91 tons/yr)
/ (1.0 - 0.5 oil in API skimming) - 94.6 tons/yr
Oil in API skinning: 94.6 tons/yr x 0.5 - 47.3 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0.15 x 16 tons/yr) - 2.4 tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator: 2.4 tons/vr + 47.3 tons/yr - 49.7 tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: (49.7 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal
eff.) - 66.3 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 66.3 tons/yr - 49.7 tons/yr - 16.6 tons/yr
Solids removed in DAF: 14.1 tons/yr influent x 0.5 solids removal efficiency
- 7 tons/yr
DAF solids effluent: 14.1 tons/yr • 7 tons/yr - 7 tons/yr
-------
Oil removed In DAF; 16.6 tons/yr influent x 0.83 oil removal efficiency -
14.1 tons/yr
DAF oil effluent: 16.6 tons/vr - 14.1 tons/yr - 2.5 tons/yr
Aaount of F03? sludge from annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):'5
Solids loading of refinery: (91 tons/yr K049 + 16 tons/yr K051) /
410.000 gallons/day - 0.00026
Sewer clean out amount: 0.00026 x 200 acres land area of refinery
x 143.7 tons/{yr/acre) (for solids loadir,
of 1.0 calculated from known refinery) -
7.5 tor.s/yr
-------
?
1
1
-Stop
Oil
bAF
bisowEfite
-------
P037 AND PG38 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AXD TRACKING SHEET
Facility ft: 117
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visics/volv:ntarv submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities <7SDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data b^se (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for 1*037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data,
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F03? (routine) - 5S4 tons/vr
-------
icility * 117
cude capacity: 81,300 barrels/dav^
astewater flow: 84,000 gallons/day2
waste generation:
K049: 124 tor.s/yc.ir2
CPI sludr.o CF037): 197 tons/year (reported)
ssumgtions:
acility Croup 4'
337 composition: 65 percent water. 10 percent: oil, and 25 percent solids by
weight5
338 composition: 65 percent water, 10 percent oil, and 25 percent solids by
weight5
348 composition: 82 percent water, 13 percent oil, and 5 percent solids by
we i gh t5
349 composition: 40 percent w-rcr. »S percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
weight5
351 composition: 65 percent vater. 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
PI" separator solids removal effici*r.cy: 70 percent6
PI separator oil removal efficiency: 85 percent6
il in the CPI skidding (to slop oil system): 50 percent6
ET solid removal efficiency: 50 percent'
stimation:
alids in the CPI sludge (F037): \0.2 x 197 tons/yr} - 39.4 tons/vr
slids in the CPI skimming (recoved «is K04 9): (0.12 x 124 tons/yr) - 14.9
tons/yr
olids removed in the CPI separator: 14.9 tons/yr + 39.4 tons/yr - 54.3
tons/yr
alids in CPI influent wastewater: ^54,3 tons/yr) / (0,7 CPI solids removal
eff.) - 77.63 tons/yr
~lids in CPI effluent wastewater: 77.6 tons/yr - 54,3 tons/yr - 23.3 tons/yr
jantity of CPI skismsing: (0.52 K049 water & solids content) x 124
tons/yr) / (1.0 - 0.5 oil in CPI skimming) - 129
tons/yr
il in CPI skimming: 12° tons/yr x 0.5 - 64.5 tons/yr
il in CPI sludge (F037): (0.15 x 197 tons/yr) - 29.6 tons/yr
il removed in the CPI separator: 64.5 tons/yr +29.6 tons/yr - 94.1 tons/yr
il in CPI influent wastewater: ?4,1 tons/yr / (0,85 CPI oil removal eff.)
- HI tons/yr
il in CPI effluent wastewater: 111 tons/yr - 94,1 tons/yr - 16.9 tons/yr
-------
Solids removal in FET (F037): (23.3 tons/yr solids in influent
wastewater) x (0.5 FET solids removal
based on settling tine calculation) - 11
tons/yr solids settling in FET
F037 sludge from FET clean out; (11.7 tons/yr solids settling in FET) /
(0.2 fraction of solids in FET sludge13)
58 tons/yr F037 sludge from FET clean ou
Aacunt of F037 sludge froa annual refinery sevqr clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sever clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinery: (126 tons, vr K0u9 + 197 tor.s/vr FQ37) /
84,000 £,.1 lons/day - 3.82 x 10"5
Sewer clean out amount: 3.82 x 10"5 x 600 acres land area of
refinery x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for
solids loading of 1.0 calculated from
known refinery) - 329 tons/yr
-------
t
-------
Pi
J j i ; ; i t I i |
//<>.'/s~pj -
j : i | j I ,
. I 1 Ha,za.rit>us Wa 1
(A
r ' ' 1 / I
>t,ifves
: , (
| i i
r. zXCH4 Wa)fe 'waftr [
* -J if' u I
. ' 6y'sfe%i _j
Off fife
Dis'fofa/
I I
tJirr/'JeirS
Civ/;"*'* Wifff S/o^Jotv*'
i I I • ! I i
i i i f
• i
i
..! J
1
» • :
i . = -•¦!!«
CRUDE, Q1L j j ! |
desaltis& Mit. i.
¦ • !'
n
j
Efp/ufst - y Wes/e fer
| [_i \ .Tfe&iwes't,
I. I ¦ Zyftk-n. . L
' I
I !
! i.i :
I I
J i
i I
" 1
• ! ! ;
i
: j
! I
i I
i :
! i t ¦ 1 '
• i i 1 ¦
i M : :!
ill';:
! i
H
/
2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 10 tl 12 13 14 *S 1C 17 18 192021 22 23 24 25 26 2? 2S 29 30 31 323334 35 38 3
I
-------
..ktfi^C,V Tshf if fir
'¦ i W&ytiyd
W"te 'ws fe
0,1/vtles
5 tJ*"'»<"
" I I " I I
.. \6kin?iir j
I i . . . . ;.. -j —;—j. i...:
^ NofHiKXAfJcus l^jecVj^
WAsttV*tf?_ J i.(^//J ! . j
/«>< ;
¥7 WT
WW i
i OfwtfrrrJ y Hazb.^Jgui Watt '¦ J OfASite .!„
I : :£/«£,} KOSt\, L.
, Disposal ~
I i
j Kecove/fJ 0:1
j j | To fates* ,
Rcccvef.i \0;
ill
XOwr.
i i !
Off Bite. \
y HkzifJesposai\_\
(w\(vs j
J 3 4 S 6 7 a 9 10 IH? 13 N 15 16 17 t» ISJ0!I 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 39 30 31 32 33 3« 35
-------
P03? AND P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility j): 113
Data sources available;
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
_x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-raigration petitions
Consents from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for FQ37 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and FQ38 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 2,237 tons/yr
-------
Facility # 118
Crude capacity: 95,000 barrels/dav1
Wastewater flow: 650,000 gal ions/day2
Assumpt ions:
Facility Group 6'
F037 composition
F038 composition
K048 composition
K049 composition
K051 composition
65 percent water, 10 percent oil, and 25 percent solids by
•-.'eight5
65 percent water, 10 pe rc rnt oil, and 25 percent solids by
weight5
82 percent water, 13 percent oil, and 5 percent solids by
weight5
40 percent water, *»8 percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
weight5
65 percent water, 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
Slop oil removal sludge (K049) was not reported in the PRDB; however, a K049
generation rate of 230 tons/yr is fsiimnted based on 1,38 metric tons/yr per
1,000 b/sd of refinery capacity®
Estimation:
Since most F037 and F038 wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also land dispose F037 and F038 wastes. Because EPA has
not received notification from this refinery identifying land-based units
(e.g., surface impoundments) accepting newlv identified TC wastes, EFA assumes
that the surface impoundments have been closed and the functions of the
surface impoundments have been replaced by tanks. EPA believes thar tanks
replacing surface impoundments would be cleaned out routinely to remove
accumulated sludges (which are considered routinely generated F037 and F038
wastes). Based on information provided in the TC questionnaire, we estimated
the quantity of wastes generated from these routine tank cleanouts to be on an
average one-third as much as wastes generated from cleanout of surface
impoundments. Calculations for surface impoundment cleanout (based on settling
of solids in an impoundment that was cleaned out every five years on the
average) and for tank cleanouts (based on the calculations for surface
impoundment cleanout) are presented below.
Quantity of sludge generated from the surface impoundments that have been
closed;
Amount of F waste sludge from upstream surface impoundment:
90,605 sq.ft area of the surface impoundment x 2 ft depth of the
sludge'4 x 63 Ib/cu.ft density of the sludge - 11.4 million lb - 5,708
tons
Quantity of sludge generated from tanks:
-------
6,678 cons of surface impoundment sludge x l/3,? - 2,226 con/yr of tank
sludge.
Aicour. ~ of F037 sludge fron annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sever clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinery: (194 tons/vr F037)/ 650.000 gallons/dav -
0,000298 .
Sewer clean out amount: 0.000298 x 267 acres land area of refiner-.'
x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading
of 1.0 calculated from known refinery) -
11. 4 cons/yr
Downstream surface impound*.- r.t vo 1 ume: 906,040 cu.ft.8
Flow - 650,000 gallons/day - $6,905 cu.ft./day
Hydraulic retention tine I KF.T >: 906,040 cu.ft. / 86,905 cu.ft./day - 10.4
day - 250 hours
Settling calculations show thi: the HRT is sufficient for complete settling of
sol ids and removal of oil.
Solids settling in basin: 194 tons/vr solids effluent from FET
Drag-cut sludge from basins and impoundments contain an average of 20 percent
solids'0; therefore, the F037 waste voluirc accumulating in the basin is
estimated at (194 tons/yr) / (0.20) - 970 tons/yr.
-------
n- H87
Fer
far
-------
F037 ACT F03 8 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AKD TRACKING SHEET
Facility #: 119
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling facilities (TSDR survev)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data,
FQ37 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 25 tons/vr
-------
Pacility # 119
Crude capacity: 115,000 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 3.01 million gallons/day2
K waste generation:
K051: -6 tons/year5
Assuirpt ions :
Facility Group 44
F037 composition: 65 percent
water,
10
percent
oil,
and
25
percent solids
by
we ight5
F033
composition: 65 percent
weight5
wate r,
10
percint
oil,
and
25
percent solids
by
KG48
composition: 82 percent
vate r,
13
percent
oil,
and
5 1
percent solids by
weight5
K049
composition: 40 percent
weight5
water.
48
percent
oil,
and
12
percent solids
by
K051
composition: 65 percent
weight5
water.
15
percent
oi 1,
and
20
percent solids
by
API separator solids removal efficiency: SO percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
FET solids removal efficiency (vhen HRT is 30 minutes): 50 percent9
Estimation:
Solids in the API sludge (K051): (0.2 x '*6 tons/yr) - 9.2 tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 9.2 tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (9,2 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids removal
eff.) - 18,4 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 18,4 tons/yr - 9.2 tons/yr - 9.2 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (KG51): (0.15 x 46 tohs/yr) -6.9 tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: (6.9 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal
eff.) - 9,2 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 9.2 tons/yr - 6.9 tons/yr - 2.3 tons/yr
Assuming a hydraulic retention time of 30 minutes, 50% of solids are removed
in the flow equalization tank.
Solids removed in FET: 9.2 tons/yr x 0.5 solids removal - 4.6 tons/yr
Drag-out sludge from basins and impoundments contain an average of 20 percent
solids10; therefore, the F037 waste volume accumulating in the basin is
estimated at (4.6 tons/yr) / 0.2 solids fraction10 - 23 tons/yr.
Amount of F037 sludge from annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinery: (46 tons/yr K051) / 3.01 million
gallons/day - 0.000015
-------
Sewer clean out anount
0.000015 x 1,000 acres land area of
refinery x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for
solids loading of 1.0 calculated from
known refinery) -2.2 tons/vr
-------
General Facility Information
Questionnaire A
V''S<>TE \JkTBe.
TP£GTAi£v/
sy srEn
~TK t>Q'J
VttkJ EfrliMfJ't
**''0^r\rlE—
< 90&-C
TO A^TPjDiSS
^ Cfr-'SiTS
7V OfeCiTZ.
~2tSfCS*L
DBiTiii-s.'o sc/iemBTic^
,fi. AVljJ
rtiTZiT**}
/JMJ
f ULo^in»t:5a/
k^T
/, 3t * o G
->¦ fJ7?bBS a
"P/scW-Poiz. ®
V
°ffSniL ^fOS^L
zinr Dao t
•77 T" XASB
nn t~ y.e ti
/JU
P0Olt 2,i^
5Tvm-a.
> TV *> Ft SITE 25/S/95/3C.
-------
GeNERAi Facility In=0!Maiion
)UES7iONSAIBEA|
"J?
VC -
Jflh)
, , j wfi^rr w*te<
-V*W TfcC fiT/",£^/r
i s v lte k\
I 7* ?
tftfkf £,~ijr^r
TO/^Dii S^ikfsc
V 1
Z>/iSC$* 4
*~p£77)/L-£: o S£rt£r-.p-rc~
KOS-f
¦ ,/ v I7*-/ I/" "
•iJfSi»»v./Viiaur
hJ5"'-"=W i -^
Rrt-TfT-
ihJ , •* 95i3fi
r? o*¥Strs
DUPSSIL
fHL«n.w«vr!>j
4, wr
a-t. "i'l
t, 3*
-»• /WOES
VlSHUVCrtt
©•;
• offSitE. a;sfrs»L
i<-.
o~o z
XS-S&
>V/£
•^,. 5, f
sstxra.
•<-c.CO>&
/sr
ssr
-> 7V CF£s/T£
-------
F037 AND P03 8 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility : 120
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage. Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
_x Petroleum refinery data base (PRD5)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine)
- 1,117 tons/yr
-------
F037 AKD P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA 0SE AHD TRACKING SHEET
Facility 121
Data sources available:
Petroleurs refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous w.iste data base
x Petroleum refinery data bise (FRD3)
No-migration petici-ns
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide sore recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
FOB? (routine) -• 125 tons/yr
F03? (surface impoundments) - 1571 tons (7/92 - 12-92)
FQ37 (surface impoundments) - 3143 tons (1/93 - 12/93)
F037 (surface impoundments) - 1571 tons (1/94 - 6/94)
-------
facility # 121
-rude capacity: 273 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 10,120,000 gallons/day2
< waste generation:
K051; 1,760 tons/year3
Assumptions:
Facility Group 64
<051 romposltion: 65 percent water, 15 percent oil. and 20 percent solids by
weight5
\PI separator solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
iPI separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
311 in the API skinning (to slop oil system): 50 percent7
Estieation:
Solids in the API sludge (K051^: (0.2 x 1,760 tons/yr) - 352 tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 352 tor.s/yr + 0 tons/yr - 352
tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (352 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids removal
eff.) - 704 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 704 tons/yr - 352 tons/yr - 352 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0,15 x 1,760 tons/yr) - 264 tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: 264 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal eff.)
- 352 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 352 tons/yr - 264 cons/yr - 88 tons/yr
Equalization basin volume: 51,218,000 cu.ft.*
Flow - 10,120,000 gallons/day - 1,353,044 cu.ft..day
Hydraulic retention time (HRT): 51,218,000 cu.ft. / 1,353,044 cu.ft./day -
37,9 day - 909.6 hours
Settling calculations show chat the HRT is sufficient for complete settling of
solids and removal of oil.
Solids and oil settling in basin: 352 tons/yr + S8 tons/yr - 440 tons/yr
Drag-out sludge front basins and impoundments contain an average of 65 percent
water*3 therefore, the F037 waste volume accumulating in the basin is
estimated at (440 tons/yr)/(l-.65)- 1257.1 tons/yr.
Amount of F037 sludge from annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):
Solids loading of refinery: ( 1,760 tons/yr K051)/ 10,120 000
gallons/day - 0,000174
-------
Sever clean out amount: 0,000174 x 5000 acres land area of
refinery x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for
solids loading of 1,0 calculated from
known refinery) - 125.02 tons/vr
The amount of F037 waste removed from surface impoundment(s) was
calculated as a lump sum. Therefore, the amount of surface impoundment waste
was divided equally among the 24 months.
-------
P037 AHT F038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USB AMD TRACKING SHEET
Facility 9: 122
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Vaste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirecents
California hazardous vaste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petition?
Comcer.ts from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F03S vaste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 11? tons/yr
-------
P037 AND PO30 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility #: 123
Daca sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery dr. ra base ( PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
x Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and FQ38 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
PQ37 and PQ38 waste esticates:
F037 (routine) - 6 tons/yr
F037 (surface ircpoundxents) - 100 tons (7/92 - 12/92)
F037 (surface impoundments) - 100 tons (1/93 - 12/93)
F037 (surface impoundments) - 100 tons (1/94 - 6/94)
-------
acillty # 123
rude capacity: 53,000 barrels/day'
astewater flow: 840,000 gallons/day2
waste generation:
K049; 44 tons/year3
K051: 44 tons/year5
ssugptions:
acility Croup 6'
049 composition: 40 percent water, 43 percer: oil, and 12 percent solids by
weight*
051 composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
PI separator solids removal efficiency: 50 percent'
PI separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
il in the API skimning (to slop oil system): 50 percent7
situation:
aount of F037 sludge fross annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
ased on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinery: (44 tons/yr K049 + 44 tons/yr K051)/
840,000 gallons/day - 0.000105
Sewer clean out amount: 0.000105 x 372 acres land area of
refinery x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for
solids loading of 1.0 calculated from
known refinery) •» 5.61 tons/yr
This refinery submitted data in the Organic TC Questionnaire on when
.irface impoundment(s) would be cleaned out and closed (or retrofitted) and
r>e amount of wastes that would be cleaned out. Using this infornation, the
PA was able to determine the quantity of F037 and F038 wastes removed form
jrface Impoundaent(s) during the time periods listed below:
July 1, 1992
Jan. 1, 1993
Jan. 1, 1994
- Dec. 31. 1992
- Dec. 31, 1993
- June 30, 1994
100 tons
100 tons
100 tons
-------
nolo G k>iut*n.
API SEPARATOR SLUDGE
LEAOEO TANK. BOTTOMS
SLOP OIL EMULSION S0L10S
HERT EXCHANGER BUNDLE
CLEANING SLUDGE
NATURAL GRS CONDENSATE
TANK SLUDGE
4 I "2 J
STORAGE AND TREAT MENT
TANK NUMBER 1
HW
2ST
(DEWATERED SLUDGE)
31WT
OFFSITE
flTTnCHMEHT 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SCHEMATIC
-------
P037 AHD P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility #: 124
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary* submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment. Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Cer.srators
_ Riennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
_____ No-roigration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 vastc estimation:
EPA used data frora the above sources because the refinery did not
provide jsore recent data.
F037 and F03B waste estiaates:
F037 (routine) - 291 tons/vr
-------
Facility # 124
Crude capacity: 130,700 barrels/day1
Wastewater flow: 1,400,000 gallons/day*
K waste generation:
K051: 799 tons/year2
Assumptions:
Facility Croup 7'
K04V composition: 40 percent water, 48 percent oil. and 12 percent solids by
we ight5
K051 composition: 65 percent water. 13 percent oil. and 20 percent solids by
weight5
API separator solids removal efficiency: 50 percent'
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
Oil in the API skirating (to slop oil system): 50 percent7
Slop oil emulsion solids (Kr-."') was not reported in T5DR survey or FRDB:
therefore, an estimated K04i quantity of 198 tons/yr was based on 1.3S metric
tons/yr (or 1.52 tons/yr) per 1.000 barrels/day®
Estimation:
Solids in the API sludge (K051): (0.2 x 799 tons/yr) - 159.8 tons/yr
Solids in the API skimming (reraoved as K049): (0.12 x 198 tons/yr) - 23.76
tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 159.8 tons/yr + 23.76 tons/yr -
183.56 tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (183.56 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids removal
eff.) - 367,12 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 367.12 tons/yr - 183,56 tons/yr - 183.56
tons/yr
Quantity of API skimming: (0.52 K049 water & solids content) x 198
tons/yr) / (1.0 - 0.5 oil in API skimming) -
205.92 tons/yr
Oil in API skimming: 205,92 tons/yr x 0.5 - 102.96 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0.15 x 799 tons/yr) - 119.85 tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator: 102.96 tons/yr + 119.85 tons/yr - 222.81
tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: 222.81 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil renoval
eff.) - 297.1 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 297.1 tons/yr - 222.81 tons/yr - 74.29
tons/yr
Since most F037 and F038 wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also land dispose F037 and F038 wastes. Because EPA has
not received notification froc this refinery identifying land-based units
(e.g., surface impoundments) accepting newly identified TC wastes, EPA assumes
that the surface impoundments have been closed and the functions of the
surface impoundments have been replaced by tanks. EPA believes that tanks
-------
replacing surface impoundments would be cleaned out routinely co remove
accumulated sludges (which are considered routinely generated F037 and F03S
wastes). Based on information provided in the TC questionnaire, we estimated
the quantity of wastes generated from these routine tank cleanouts to be on an
average one-third as much as wastes generated from cleanout of surface
impoundments. Calculations for surface impoundment cleanout (based on settling
of solids in an impoundment that was cleaned out every five years on the
average) and for tank cleanouts (based on the calculations for surface
impoundment cleanout) are presented below.
Quantity of sludge generated from the surface impoundments that have been
closed:
Equalization basin volume; 2,239,000 cu.ft.2
Flo- - 1,400,000 gallons/day - 187,180 cu.ft./dav
Hydraulic retention time (HRT); 2.239,000 cu.ft. / 187.180 cu.ft./day - 12
day - 283 hours
Settling calculations show that the HRT is sufficient for complete settling of
solids and removal of oil.
Solids and oil settling in basin; 183.56 tons/yr + 74.29 tons/yr - 257.85
tonr./yr
Drag-out sludge from basins and impoundments contain an average of 65 percent
water1* therefore, the F037 waste volume accxur.ulating in the basin is
estimated at (257.85 tons/yr)/(1».65)- 736.7 tons/yr.
Quanrity of sludge generated from tanks:
737 tons of surface impoundment sludge x 1 /317 - 246 ton/yr of tank sludge.
Amount of F037 sludge from annual refinery sever clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities,) :15
Solids loading of refinery: (198 tons/yr K049 + 799 tons/yr K051)/
1,400,000 gallons/day - 0.000712
Sewer clean out amount: 0.000712 x 436 acres land area of
refinery x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for
solids loading of 1.0 calculated from
known refinery) - 44.61 tons/yr
-------
FQ37 AND F033 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility tf: 125
Data sources available:
___ Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Contrators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F03? and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data,
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 {routine)
- 73 tons/yr
-------
Facility # 125
Crude capacity: 20,000 barrelr/day1
Wastewater flow: 30,000 gallons/day2
Assumptions:
Facility Croup 34
K049 composition: 40 percent vaier, 43 percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
weight5
KQS1 composition: 65 percent water. 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
API separator solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
Oil in the API skimming (to slop oil system): 50 percent7
API sludge (K051) was not reported in TSDR Survey or PRDB; therefore, an
estimated K051 quantity of 65 tor.s/vr was based on 2,2 metric tons/yr {or 2.43
tons/yr) per 1,000 barrels/day®.
Slop oil emulsion solids (KOwas not reported in TSDR survey or PRDB;
therefore, an estiaated K049 quantity of 41 tons/yr vas based on 1.38 metric
tons/yr (or 1.52 tons/yr) per 1,000 barrels/day8
Estimation:
Solids in the API sludge (K051): (0.2 x 65 tons/yr) - 13 tons/yr
Solids in the API skimming (removed as K049): (0.12 x 41 tons/yr) - 4.92
tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 13 tons/yr + 4.92 tons/yr - 17.92
tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (17,92 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids removal
eff.) - 35.84 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 35.84 tons/yr - 17.92 tons/yr - 17.92
tons/yr
Quantity of API skimming: (0.52 K049 water & solids content) x 41 tons/yr)
/ (1,0 - 0.5 oil in API skimming) - 42.64
tons/vr
Oil in API skimming: 42.64 tons/yr x O.S - 21,32 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0.15 x 65 tons/yr) - 9.75 tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator: 21.32 tons/yr + 9.75 tons/yr - 31,07
tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: 31.07 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal
eff.) - 41.4 tons/yr
Oil ir. API effluent wastewater: 41,4 tons/yr - 31.07 tons/yr - 10.33
tons/yr
Since most F037 and F038 wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also land dispose F037 and F038 wastes. Because EPA has
not received notification from this refinery identifying land-based units
(e.g., surface impoundments) accepting newly identified TC wastes, EPA assumes
that the surface impoundments have been closed and the functions of the
surface impoundments have been replaced by tanks, EPA believes that tanks
-------
replacing surface impoundments would be cleaned out routinely to remove
accumulated sludges (which are considered routinely generated F037 and F038
wastes). Based on information provided in the TC questionnaire, we estimated
the quantity of wastes generated fros these routine tank cleanouts to be on an
average one-third as much as wastes generated from cleanout of surface
impoundments, Calculations for surface impoundnent cleanout (based on settling
of solids in an impoundment that v.is cleaned out every five years on the
average) and for tank cleanouts (based on the calculations for surface
impoundment cleanout) are presented below.
Quantity of sludge generated from the surface impoundments that have been
closed:
Equalization basin volume: 436,000 cu.fi.2
Flow - 30,000 gallons/day - 4,011 cu.ft./dav
Hydraulic retention tine (HRT): 436,000 cu.ft. / 4,011 cu.ft./day - 108.7
day - 2608.8 hours
Settling calculations show that tin- HRT is sufficient for complete settling of
solids and reitoval of oil.
Solids and oil settling in t,»:.in: 17.92 tons/yr + 10.33 tons/yr - 28.25
tons/yr
Drag-out sludge from basins and irrpoundreents contain an average of 65 percent
water15; therefore, the F037 waste volume accumulating in the basin is
estimated at (28.25 tons/yr)/(1•.65)- 80.7 tons/yr.
Quantity of sludge generated from tanks:
81 tons of surface inpound-tent sludge x 1/317 - 27 ton/yr of tank sludge.
Anount of F037 sludge from annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):15
' Solids loading of refinery: ( 41 tons/vr KQ49 + 65 tons/yr K051)/
30,000 gallons/day - 0.003533
Sewer clean out amount: 0.003533 x 90 acres land area of refinery
x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading
of 1.0 calculated from known refinery) -
45.69 tons/yr
-------
I'-J.iV AKD FC38 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USB AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility #: 126
Data sources available:
Petroleuas refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment;, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery dita base (PROS)
No-raigration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estieAtjcm:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and FC38 waste estisates:
F037 (routine) - 1,305 tons/yr
-------
Facility # 126
Crude capacity: 115,000 barrels/day'
Uastevater flow: 20,000 gallons/day2
K waste generation:
K0&9: 139 tons/year'
.KG51: 55 tons/year2
Assuaptions:
Facility Group 1*
K049 composition: 40 percent water, 48 percent oil. and 12 percent solids by
weight5
K051 composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
API separator solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent'
Oil in the API skimming (to slop oil system): 50 percent'
Slop oil emulsion solids (K049) was not reported in TSDR survey or PRDB;
therefore, an estimated K049 quantity of 139 tons/yr was based on 1.38 metric
tons/yr (or 1.52 tons/yr) per 1,000 barrcls/dav8
Estimation:
Solids in the API sludge (R051): (0.2 x 55 tons/yr) - 11 tons/yr
Solids in the API skiejoing (reaoved as K0&9): (0.12 x 139 tons/yr) - 16.68
tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 11 tons/yr + 16.68 tons/yr - 27.68
tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (27.68 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids removal
eff.) - 55,36 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater: 55.36 tons/yr - 27.68 tons/yr - 27.68
tons/yr
Quantity of API skimming: (0.52 K049 water & solids content) x 139
tons/yr) / (1.0 - 0.5 oil in API skimming) -
144.56 tons/yr
Oil In API skimaing: 144.56 tons/yr x 0.5 - 72.28 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0.15 x 55 tons/yr) - 8.25 tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator: 72.28 tons/yr + 8.25 tons/yr - 80.53
tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: 80.53 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal
eff.) - 107.4 tons/yr
Oil in API effluent wastewater: 107.4 tons/yr - 80.53 tons/yr - 26,87
tons/yr
Aaount of F037 sludge from annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):15
-------
Solids loading of refinery
'.139 cons/vr K049 4- 55 tons/yr KQ51)/
:0.000 gallons/day - 0.0097
Sewer clean out amount: 0,0097 x 306 acres land area cf refinery
x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading
of 1.0 calculated from known refinery) -
—26.53 tons/yr
Since most F037 and F03S wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also land dispose F037 and F038 wastes. Because EPA has
not received notification from this refinery identifying land-bas'ed units
(e.g., surface impoundments) accepting newly identified TC wastes, £PA assumes
that the surface impoundments have been clored and the functions of che
surface impoundments have been replaced by tanks. EPA believes that tanks
rep1acing surface impoundments would be cleaned out routinely to remove
accumulated sludges (which are considered routinely generated F037 and F038
wastes). Based on information provided in the TC questionnaire, we estimated
the quantity of wastes generated from these routine tank cleanouts to be on an
average one-third as much as wastes generated froz cleanout of surface
impoundments. Calculations fcr surface impoundment cleanout (based on settling
of solids in an impoundment that was cleaned out every five years on the
average) and for tank cleanouts (based on the calculations for surface
impoundment cleanout) are presented below.
Quantity of sludge generated from the surface impoundments that have been
closed:
Amount of F waste sludge from upstresr surface impound/cent:
41,818 sq, ft area of the surface impoundment x 2 ft depth of the
sludge14 x 63 lb/cu.ft density of the sludge - 5,269,0681b - 2,634 tons
Quantity of sludge generated from tanks:
2,634 tons of surface impoundment sludge x 1/3*7 - S78 ton/yr of tank sludge.
-------
<±3d
-------
P037 AND F03S WASTB CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USI AKD TRACKING SHEET
Facility &: 12?
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migration petitions
Corsaents from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basts for F037 and F038 vaste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and FQ38 vaste estieates:
F037 (routine) - 235 tons/yr
-------
P037 AHD r038 WASTS CAPACITY AKALYSIS:
DATA OSS AKD TRACKING SHEET
Facility II: 128
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Wnste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous vasce d«ta base
_x Petroleum refinery data bar.c (TRDB)
No-migration petitions
Consents from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F03S waste estircntion:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 2,790 cons
-------
i
7037 AST! F03 8 KASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA OSS AXD TRACKING SHEET
Facility #; 129
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Wasce Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSD8 survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Vaste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous vaste data base
x Petroleun refinery data b3se (PRDB)
No-aigration petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
x Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis fer F037 and F038 uaste estimation:
EPA used data fron the above sources because the refinery did not
provide nore recent data.
F037 and F038 vaste estisates:
F037 (routine) - 474 tons/vr
-------
P037 AMD P038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS I
DATA OSS AMD TRACKING SHEET
Facility #: 130
Data sources available:
Petroleua refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Haste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (T5DR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
i
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
' Ko-migratlon petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
ErA used data fron the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 642 tons/yr
-------
Facility * 130
Crude capacity: 68,000 barrels/day'
Wastewater flow;- 180,000 gallons/day*
K waste generation:
K043: 38 tons/year2
K051; 75 tons/year2
Assumptions:
Facility Group l4
and 12 percent solids by
and 20 percent solids by
K049 composition: 40 percent water, 48 percent oil,
weight5
KPS1 composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent oil,
weight5
API separator solids renoval efficiency: 50 percent6
API separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
DAF unit solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
DAF unit oil removal efficiency: 85 percent6
Oil in the API skimming (to slop oil system): 50 percent7
Slop oil emulsion solids (KC49) was not reported in TSDR survey or FRDB;
therefore, an estimated KC49 quantity of 103 tons/yr was based on 1.38 metric
tons/yr (or 1,52 tons/yr) per 1,000 barrels/day®
Estimation:
Oil in API sludge (K051):
Solids In the API sludge (K051)
Oil in API influent wastewater:
Solids in API influent wastewater:
Oil in API effluent wastewater:
Solids in API effluent wastewater:
Oil in 0WS influent wastewater:
Solids in OtfS influent wastewater:
Oil removal in OUS (F037):
(0.15 x 75 tons/yr) - 11.25 tons/yr
(0,2 x 75 tons/yr) - 15 tons/yr
(11.25 tons/yr) / (0.75 AFI oil removal
eff.) - 20 tons/yr
(15 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids removal
eff.) - 30 tons/yr
20 tons/yr
30 tons/yr
11.25 tons/yr - 8.75 tons/yr
15 tons/yr - 15 tons/yr
(11.25 tons/yr oil in effluent wastewater)
/ (1.0 - 0.75 fraction of oil settling
based on 30 min.'1 residence time) - 45
tons/yr oil in Influent wastewater
(15 tons/yr solids in effluent wastewater)
/ (1.0 ¦ 0.5 fraction of solids settling
based on 30 min,11 residence time) - 30
tons/yr solids in influent wastewater
45 tons/yr oil in influent wastewater -
11.25 oil in OUS effluent wastewater -
33.75 tons/yr oil settling in QS.'S
-------
30 tons/yr solids in influent wastewater -
15 solids in OWS effluent wastewater - 15
tons/yr solids settling in OWS
(33.75 tons/yr oil + 15 tons/yr solids
settling in OWS) / (0.35 fraction of oil
and solids in OWS sludge12) - 139 tons/yr
F037 sludge from OWS clean out
Oil in DAF float (K048); (8.75 tons/yr) x (0.85 DAF oil removal
efficiency) - ,43 tons/yr
So'Id in DAF float (K048): (15 tons/yr) >. {0.5 removal efficiency) - 7.5
tons/ yr
Oil In DAF effluent wastewater: (8.75 tons/yr) - (7.43 oil reooved by DAF
float - 1.32 tons/yr
Solids in DAF effluent wastewater: (15 tons/vr influent solids) - 7.5 tons/yr
removed by DAF float - 7.5 tons/yr
Since most F037 and F038 wastes exhibit the IC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also land dispose F037 and F038 wastes. Because EPA has
not received notification from this refinery identifying land-based units
(e.g., surface impoundments) accepting newly identified TC wastes, EPA assumes
that the surface Impoundments have been closed and the functions of the
surface impoundments have been replaced by tanks. EPA believes that tanks
replacing surface impoundments would be cleaned out routinely to remove
accumulated sludges (which are considered routinely generated F037 and F038
wastes). Based on information provided In the TC questionnaire, we estimated
the quantity of wastes generated from these routine tank cleanouts to be on an
average one-third as much as wastes generated from cleanout of surface
impoundments. Calculations for surface impoundment cleanout (based on settling
of solids In an impoundaent that was cleaned out every five years on the
average) and for tank cleanouts (based on the calculations for surface
ittpoundaent cleanout) are presented below.
Quantity of sludge generated froni the surface impoundments that have been
closed:
Amount of F waste sludge from upstream surface iepoundoent:
21,780 sq.ft area of the surface impoundment x 2 ft depth of the
sludge14 x 63 Ib/cu.ft density of the sludge- 2,744,280 lbs - 1372 tons
Quantity of sludge generated froo tanks:
1372 tons cf surface impoundment sludge x 1/3" - 457 ton/yr of tank sludge.
Amount of F037 sludge from annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinery: (88 tons/yr K048 + 103 tons/yr K049 + 75
tons/yr K051)/ 180,000 gallons/day -
0.00147S
Solids reraoval in OWS (F037):
F037 sludge from OWS clean out:
-------
Sewer clean out amount:
0.001478 x 217 acres land area of refinery
x 143.7 cons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading
of 1.0 calculated from known refinery) -
46.08 tons/yr
-------
F037 AND F03B WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSTS:
DATA tJSE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility 131
Data sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base
-------
acility #131
Irude capacity: 35,000 barrels/day'
'aseevater flow; 90,000 gallons/day2
I waste generation:
K051: 51 tons/year2
issumptions:
"acility Group
C049 composition: 40 percent water, 48 percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
weight5
C051 composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
VPI separator solids remo%'al efficiency: 50 percent6
\PI separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
3A.F unit solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
DAT unit oil removal efficiency: 85 percent6
Dil in the AFX skinning (to slop oil system): 50 percent7
Slop oil emulsion solids (K049) was not reported in TSDR survey or PRDB;
therefore, an estimated K049 quantity of 46 tons/yr was based on 1,38 metric
tons/yr (or 1.52 tons/yr) per 1,000 barrels/day8
Estimation:
Aaount of F037 sludge fron annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refinery: ( 46 tons/yr K049 + 51 tons/yr K051)/
90,000 gallons/day - 0.001078
Sewer clean out amount: 0.001078 x 100 acres land area of refinery
x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading
of 1.0 calculated from known refinery) -
16 tons/yr
-------
F037 ANi) F038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA DSS AND TRACKING SHUT
Facility §: 132
Data sources available:
Fetroleun refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDS)
No-nigraetori petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
x Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data,
F037 and F038 waste estissates;
F037 (routine) - 103 tons/yr
-------
acllity t 132
:rude capacity: 60,000 barrels/day'
'astewater flow: 40,000 gallons/day2
; waste generation:
K051: 21 tons/year2
tssuaption's:
'acllity Group 44
;049 composition: 40 percent water, 48 percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
weight5
:051 composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
iFI separator solids removal efficiency: 50 percent4
iPI separator oil removal efficiency: 75 percent6
)AF unit solids removal efficiency: 50 percent4
>AF unit oil removal efficiency: 85 percent4
HI in the API skinning (to slop oil system): 50 percent7
*ET solid removal efficiency: 50 percent®
»lop oil emulsion solids (K049) was not reported in TSDR survey or PRDB;
:herefore, an estimated K049 quantity of 273 tons/yr was based on 1.38 .retrie
:ons/yr (or 1.52 tons/yr) per 1,000 barrels/day*
estimation:
Solids in the API sludge (K051): (0.2 x 21 tons/yr) - 4.2 tons/yr
Solids in the API skimming (reooved as K049): (0.12 x 273 tons/yr) -
tons/yr
Solids reooved in the API separator: 4.2 tons/yr + 32.76 tons/yr
tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater:
32.76
37
(37 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids removal
eff.) - 74 tons/yr
74 tons/yr - 37 tons/yr - 37 tons/yr
(0.52 K049 water & solids content) x 273
cons/yr) / (1.0 - 0.5 oil in API skimming) - 283
tons/yr
283 tons/yr x 0.5 - 142 tons/yr
(0.15 x 21 tons/yr) - 3.15 tons/yr
142 tons/yr +3.15 tons/yr - 145 tons/yr
(145 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil .removal
eff.) - 193 tons/yr
3il in API effluent wastewater: 193 tons/yr - 145 tons/yr - 48 tons/yr
Solids in API effluent wastewater:
Quantity of API skioaing:
311 in API skinning:
Jil in API sludge (K051):
311 removed in the API separator:
Dil ir API influent wastewater:
Oil removed in 02 API separator: 48 tons/yr x (.75 oil removal efficiency)
- 36 tons/yr
Solid reooved' in #2 API separator: 37 tons/yr x (0.5 solids removal
efficiency) - 18
-------
Filter solids removal:
Filter oil resoval:
9 tons/yr
12 cons/yr
Total oil and solids removed 9 tons/yr + 12 tons/yr - 21 tons/yr
Total F037 generate from the filter: 21 tons/yr / (0.6 solids & oil
fraction14) - 36 tons/yr
Amount of F037 sludge froa annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sever clean out quantities):
Solids loading of refinery: ( 273 tons/yr K049 + 21 tons/yr K051)/
400,000 gallons/day - .000735
Sewer clean out amount: 0.000735 x 200 acres land area of refinery
x 143.7 tor.s/(yr/acre) (for solids loading
of 1.0 calculated froa known refinery) -
21 tons/yr
-------
HuJ.
WHUJ_
K)Hu).
I
I -
|
i
i -
I
I
!
I
I
I No. W<001
I
L4igp .
TR-ZATKAJZuT _
umi ~r
C o\jT/ii/06e-
5T0^A6£
AR£A
JJHcu To
ou-Sif£
Disposal.
Hu) 4U5
^ AJHu) To
oFP-itre
UfiP05A<-
E£CyCU*J6
-------
Oil In if2 API effluent wastewater: 48 cons/yr • 36 tons/yr - 12
Solids in #2 API effluent wastewater: 37 tons/yr - 18 tons/yr - 18 tons/yr
Solids removal in FET (F037): (18 tons/yr solids in influent wastewater)
X (0,5 FET solids removal efficiency) ¦* 9
tons/yr solids settling in FET
F037 sludge from FET clean out: (9 tons/yr solids settling in FET) / (0,2
fraction of solids in FET sludge10) - 45
tons/yr F037 sludge from FET clean out
Solids in FET effluent wastewater: (18 tons/yr solids In influent wastewater
- 9 tons/yr solids settling in FET) - 9
tons/yr solids in effluent wastewater
Filter solids removal: 9 tons/yr
Filter oil resoval: 12 tons/yr
Total oil and solids removed 9 tons/yr + 12 tons/yr - 21 tons/yr
Total F037 generate froa the filter: 21 tons/yr / (0.6 solids & oil
fraction16) - 36 tons/yr
Aoount of F037 sludge froa annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
based on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):'5
Solids loading of refinery: ( 273 tons/yr K049 + 21 tons/yr K051)/
400,000 gallons/day - ,000735
Sewer clean out amount: 0.000735 x 200 acres land area of refinery
x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading
of 1.0 calculated from known refinery) -
21 tons/yr
-------
047399
*3 GeueizAi. facility-ujt De Xjh£mat>c
rt
ro
-•9-
Hu)_
'UJ
LAtiD .
TR.€ATM€*J.r . _
out r
U
COAOT^./OGe-
5T0R-A&E
AK£A
UHu) TO
OW-SiTfi
.... Dispose «_
flu)
HHUJ TO
Di"SP05/»C J*
g£tytU*J6
-------
®47SQ z
L NHU
ro o«=-'Sir»£
T>i-i a r,
Ke
-------
047399
—
3. D
j. ... .
3aAP; 23 AP . ___
r
\
HuJ Co icy -5CUC6£S;
T/4.MK BoiratAS ,
"SPicl. c ceAfJuP.y
5FSUT 7"/^£ATiM
-------
FQ37 AND F03 8 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA USE AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility if: 133
Data sources Available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Unste Treatment, Storage. Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
• California hazardous vaste data base
x frtroleura refinery data base (J'RDB)
No*raigration petiticr.s
Comioents from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 vaste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sourcts because the refinery did not
provide mote recent data,
F037 and F038 waste estinates:
F037 (routine) - 1,852 tons/yr
F03S (routine) - 171 tons/yr
-------
P037 AND FQ38 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA 0SS AND TRACKING SHEET
icility #: 134
3ta sources available:
Petroleum refinery visits/voluntary submission
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Vaste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous waste data base
x Petroleum refinery data base (PRDB)
No-migrat5on petitions
Comments from the proposed rule
Organic Toxicity Survey
asis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data from the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data.
337 and F038 vaste estimates:
F037 (routine) - 143 tons/yr
-------
Facility # 134
Crude capacity: 34,000 barrels/day'
Wastewater flow: 150,000 gallons/day2
K waste generation:
K051: 51 tons/year2
Assumptions:
Facility Group 7'
K049 composition: 40 percent water, 48 percent oil, and 12 percent solids by
weight5
K051 composition: 65 percent water, 15 percent oil, and 20 percent solids by
weight5
API separator solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
API separator oil reooval efficiency: 75 percent6
DAF unit solids removal efficiency: 50 percent6
DAF unit oil removal efficiency: 85 percent4
Oil in the API skimming (to slop oil system): 50 percent7
Slop oil emulsion solids (K049) was not reported in TSDR survey or FRDB;
therefore, an estimated K049 quantity of 52 tons/yr was based on 1.33 metric ¦
tons/yr {or 1.52 tons/yr) per 1,000 barrels/day3
Estimation:
Solids in the API sludge (K051): (0.2 x 51 tons/yr) - 10.2 tons/yr
Solids in the API skimming (removed as K049): (0.12 x 52 tons/yr) - 6.24
tons/yr
Solids removed in the API separator: 10.2 tons/yr + 6.24 tons/yr - 16.44
tons/yr
Solids in API influent wastewater: (32.38 tons/yr) / (0.5 API solids removal
eff.) - 16,44 tons/yr
Solids In API effluent wastewater: 32.88 tons/yr - 16.44 tons/yr - 16.44
tons/yr
Quantity of API skimming: (0.52 K049 water & solids content) x 52 tons/yr)
/ (1.0 - 0.5 oil in API skinmiing) - 54 tons/yr
Oil in API skimming: 54 tons/yr x 0.5 - 27 tons/yr
Oil in API sludge (K051): (0.15 x 51tons/yr) - 7.65 tons/yr
Oil removed in the API separator: 27 tons/yr + 7.65 tons/yr - 34 tons/yr
Oil in API influent wastewater: ( 34 tons/yr) / (0.75 API oil removal
eff.) - 45 tons/yr
Oil in ATI effluent wastewater: 45 tons/yr - 34 tons/yr - 11 tons/yr
The turbulence caused by the aeration coupled with the short residence time in
the API unit prevents significant settling: therefore, we examined settling
characteristics in the equalization basin.
Since nost F037 and F038 wastes exhibit the TC for benzene, refineries that
land dispose TC wastes also land dispose F037 and F038 wastes. Because EPA has
not received notification from this refinery identifying land-based units
(e.g., surface impoundments) accepting newly identified TC wastes, EPA assumes
-------
•.at the surface impoundments have been closed and the functions of the
irface impoundments have been replaced by tanks. EPA believes that tanks
•placing surface impoundments would be cleaned out routinely to remove
:cunulated sludges (which are considered routinely generated F037 and F038
astes). Based on information provided In the TC questionnaire, we estimated
ne quantity of wastes generated froa these routine tank cleanouts to be on an
¦¦erage one-third as ouch as wastes generated froa cleanout of surface
spoundaents. Calculations for surface impoundment cleanout (based on settling
f solids In an impoundment that vas cleaned out every five years on the
verage) and for tank cleanouts (based on the calculations for surface
spoundaent cleanout) are presented below.
uantity of sludge generated froa the surface impoundments that have been
losed:
qualization basin volume: 3,531.000 cu.ft J
low - 150,000 gallons/day - 20,204 cu.ft./day
ydraulic retention time (HRT): 3,581,000 cu.ft. / 20,204 cu.ft./day - 179
day - 4292 hours
ettling calculations show that the HRT is sufficient for complete settling of
olids and removal of oil.
olids and oil settling in basin: 11 tons/yr <- 16.44 tons/yr - 27.44 tons/yr
rag-out sludge from basins and impoundments contain an average of 65 percent
ater15; therefore," the F037 waste voluuo accumulating in the basin is
stiirated at ( 27.44 tons/yr)/(I- .65)- 78 tons/yr.
uantity of sludge generated froa tanks:
95 tons of surface impoundment sludge x l/3,? - 132 ton/yr of tank sludge.
count of F037 sludge froa annual refinery sever,clean out (extrapolation
¦ased on refineries with known sewer clean out quantities):15
Solids loading of refiner)-: I 52 tons/vr K049 + 51 tons/yr K051)/
150,000 gallons/day - 150,000
Sewer clean out aoount: 0.000687 x 113 acres land area of refinery
x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading
of 1,0 calculated fron known refinery) -
11 tons/yr
-------
F037 AND F038 WASTE CAPACITY ANALYSIS:
DATA TJSK AND TRACKING SHEET
Facility 9: 13S
Data sources av'ailable:
Petroleun refinery visits/voluntnry submission
x Kational Survey of Hazardous tfaste Treatment, Storage, Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (TSDR survey)
x National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
Biennial report/state reporting requirements
California hazardous vaste data base
x Fetroleun refiner}' data base (fRDB)
No-migration petitions
Comments from the proposed rulo
Organic Toxicity Survey
Basis for F037 and F038 waste estimation:
EPA used data froo the above sources because the refinery did not
provide more recent data,
F037 and F038 waste estimates:
F037 (routine) » 3 tons/yr
-------
illty # 135
de capacity: 80,000 barrels/day1
tcvater flow: 105,000 gallons/day2
aste generation:
K048: 12 cons/year3
K051: 15 tons/year3
tactions:
illty Group 4 4
iuation:
ur.C of F037 sludge from annual refinery sewer clean out (extrapolation
ed on refineries Kith known sever clean out quantities):'5
Solids loading of refinery: ( 12 tons/yr K048 + 15 tons/yr K051)/
105,000 gallons/day - 0.000257
Sewer clean out amount: 0.000257 x 70 acres land area of refinery
x 143.7 tons/(yr/acre) (for solids loading
of 1.0 calculated from knovn refinery) - 3
tons/yr
-------
WHu-
/ BUwJUuH
PeTAiLtrD SclttMA-Tn. oF toh%Te*Jtrt*>z- sy&Trm of
&
-------
EPA53Q-R-97-G37f
i in mi ii nun mi linn
j PB97^ 17747;
JNT FOR CAPACITY ANALYSIS FOR NEWLY LISTED WASTES AND
»SUPPORT 40 CFR 268 LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS; FINAL;
- CATEGORY 2 FACILITIES FOR THE F037 AND FQ38 CAPACITY ANALYSIS
15. Report Date
June 1992
16.
18. Performing Organization Rept
I
Name and Address
TE
60
| 10, Proj cclTask/Work Unit No.
|11. Contract © or Grant (G) No.
M
1(0)
n Name and Address
| 13. Type of Report & Period Cow
I TECHNICAL REPORT
114.
«to)
)N ON PETROLEUM REFINERIES USED FOR ESTIMATING REQUIRED F037 AND F038 CAPACITY. INCLUDES KEY fl
3TIMATE FQ37 AND F038 GENERATION FOR CATEGORY 2 FACILITIES AND ESTIMATES OF F037 AND F038 WASTE
S.
Descriptors
sd Terms
119. Security Class (This Report) 121. No. of Pages
| UNCLASSIFIED |
------- |