Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance
INSPECTION MANUAL
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
Number: OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1
8/15/2018
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
&EPA
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 1 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
This page intentionally left blank

-------
Revision History
This table shows changes to this controlled document over time. The most recent version is
presented in the top row of the table. Previous versions of the document are maintained by the
Document Control Coordinator.
History
Effective Date
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual Revisions:
•	Appendix B Inspection Checklists, formatting changes and
inclusion of references to the How to Comply Manual,
pages 80-99.
•	Added compliance date for inclusion of revised worker
and handler safety training content of December 19,
2018, page 20.
8/15/2018
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual, Original Issue
1/2/2017
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 3 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
Inspection Manual Revisions
This Worker Protection Standard (WPS) Inspection Manual is an inspection support tool provided
by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), for use by EPA regions, states and tribes
conducting federal inspections under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act and
is a supplement to the EPA FIFRA Inspection Manual released in 2013. States and tribes may also
conduct inspections under their own authority and credentials. This document supersedes the
EPA WPS Agricultural Inspection Guidance released in February 2012. EPA appreciates the
valuable contributions made by EPA Regions, states and tribes to improve the manual.
DISCLAIMER
This Inspection Manual is not a regulation and, therefore, does not add,
eliminate or change any existing regulatory requirements. The statements in
this document are intended solely as guidance. This document is not
intended, nor can it be relied on, to create any rights enforceable by any
party in litigation with the United States. EPA, state and tribal officials may
decide to follow the guidance provided in this document, or to act at
variance with the guidance, based on analysis of site-specific circumstances.
Deviations from this document on the part of any duly authorized official,
inspector, or agent shall not be a defense in any enforcement action; nor
shall deviation from this manual constitute grounds for rendering the
evidence obtained thereby inadmissible in a court of law. This manual may
be revised without public notice to reflect changes in EPA's policy.
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 4 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
CONTENTS
Chapter 1. Introduction	9
1.1	The Worker Protection Standard	9
1.2	Goals of WPS USE Inspections	10
Chapter 2. Types of WPS Inspections	11
2.1	WPS Inspections	11
2.1.1	Routine (Non-Complaint Based) Inspections	11
2.1.2	For Cause (Complaint Based) Inspections	11
2.2	Inspection Timing - Tier I and Tier II	11
2.2.1	WPS Tier I	12
2.2.2	WPS Tier II	12
Chapter 3. Types of Regulated Establishments	12
3.1	Agricultural Establishment	12
3.2	Owners of Agricultural Establishments and Their Immediate Family	13
3.3	Commercial Pesticide Handling Establishment	14
3.4	Farm Labor Contractors (FLC)	15
Chapter 4. Pre-lnspection Planning	16
4.1	Document Review	16
4.2	Biosecurity, Food safety and Personal Safety	16
Chapter 5. Conducting the Inspection	17
5.1	Opening Conference	17
5.2	Documentation	18
5.3	Review Pesticide Labels on Site	20
5.4	Record Review	20
Page 5 of 113
EPA	Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
Effective Date: 8/15/2018	OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
5.4.1	Application and Hazard Information Records (§170.311)	20
5.4.2	Pesticide Safety Training Records (§170.401(d), §170.501(d))	20
5.43 Respirator Safety Records (§170.509(b)(10))	21
5.5	Employer/Supervisor Interviews	24
5.5.1	Requirements that Apply to Agricultural Employers of Workers,
Agricultural Employers of Handlers, and Commercial Pesticide Handler
Employers	25
5.5.2	Requirements that Only Apply to Agricultural Employers of Workers and
Agricultural Employers of Handlers	30
5.5.3	Restrictions for Agricultural Employers during Applications	35
5.5.4	Treated Areas Information from the Agricultural Employer to the
Commercial Handler Employer	37
5.5.5	Requirements that Only Apply to Agricultural Employers of Workers... 37
5.5.6	Requirements That Only Apply to Agricultural Employers of Handlers and
Commercial Pesticide Handler Employers	42
5.6	Employee Interviews	51
5.6.1	Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Limited English Proficiency.. 52
5.6.2	Addressing Language Barriers	52
5.6.3	Addressing Disabilities	53
5.7	Worker Interviews	53
5.7.1	Pesticide Safety Training	54
5.7.2	Decontamination Supplies	54
5,73 Emergency Assistance	54
5.7.4	Display of Pesticide Safety, Application and Hazard Information	55
5.7.5	Establishment-Specific Information	56
5.7.6	Notification of Treated Areas and Restrictions During and After
Applications	57
Page 6 of 113
EPA	Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
Effective Date: 8/15/2018	OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
5.7.7	Early Entry	57
5.7.8	Retaliation	59
5.7.9	Pesticide Exposure Incidents	59
5.8	Handler Interviews	59
5.8.1	Minimum Age	60
5.8.2	Pesticide Safety Training	61
5.8.3	Decontamination and Eye Flushing Supplies	61
5.8.4	Emergency Assistance	62
5.8.5	Display of Pesticide Safety, Application and Hazard Information	62
5.8.6	Establishment-Specific Information	64
5.8.7	Information on Treated Areas Provided to a Commercial Pesticide Handler
Employer and Handler	64
5.8.8	Safe Operation of Equipment	65
5.8.9	Restrictions for Handlers and Handler Employers during Applications.. 65
5.8.10	Handler Knowledge of Labeling and Application-Specific Information 66
5.8.11	Applications of Highly Toxic Pesticides	67
5.8.12	Fumigant Applications in Enclosed Space Production	67
5.8.13	Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for Handlers	67
5.8.14	PPE Exceptions	70
5.8.15	Retaliation	73
5.8.16	Pesticide Exposure Incidents	73
5.9	Exit Conference	73
Chapter 6. Post Inspection	74
End Notes	75
Appendix A: Glossary of Terms	76
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 7 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
Appendix B: Sample Inspection Checklists	80
Appendix C: OSHA Regulations on Respirators	100
Appendix D: Table—Entry Restrictions During Enclosed Space Production Pesticide
Applications 170.405(b)(4)	107
Appendix E: WPS Application Zone Requirements Question and Answer Fact Sheet. 109
Appendix F: Additional Resources	113
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 8 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
APPENDIX A: GLOSSARY OF TERMS
§ 170.305 Definitions.
Terms used in this part have the same meanings they have in the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act, as amended. In addition, the following terms, when used in this part, shall have the
following meanings:
Agricultural employer — means any person who is an owner of, or is responsible for the management or
condition of, an agricultural establishment, and who employs any worker or handler.
Agricultural establishment — means any farm, forest operation, or nursery engaged in the outdoor or
enclosed space production of agricultural plants. An establishment that is not primarily agricultural is an
agricultural establishment if it produces agricultural plants for transplant or use (in part or their entirety)
in another location instead of purchasing the agricultural plants.
Agricultural plant — means any plant, or part thereof, grown, Maintained, or otherwise produced for
commercial purposes, including growing, maintaining or otherwise producing plants for sale or trade, for
research or experimental purposes, or for use in part or their entirety in another location. Agricultural
plant includes, but is not limited to, grains, fruits and vegetables; wood fiber or timber products; flowering
or foliage plants and trees; seedlings and transplants; and turf grass produced for sod. Agricultural plant
does not include pasture or rangeland used for grazing.
Application exclusion zone - means the area surrounding the application equipment that must be free of
all persons other than appropriately trained and equipped handlers during pesticide applications.
Chemigation — means the application of pesticides through irrigation systems.
Closed system - means an engineering control used to protect handlers from pesticide exposure hazards
when mixing and loading pesticides.
Commercial pesticide handler employer - means any person other than an agricultural employer, who
employs any handler to perform handler activities on an agricultural establishment. A labor contractor
who does not provide pesticide application services or supervise the performance of handler activities, but
merely employs laborers who perform handler activities at the direction of an agricultural or handler
employer, is not a commercial pesticide handler employer.
Commercial pesticide handling establishment — means any enterprise, other than an agricultural
establishment, that provides pesticide handler or crop advising services to agricultural establishments.
Crop advisor — means any person who is assessing pest numbers or damage, pesticide distribution, or the
status or requirements of agricultural plants.
Designated representative - means any persons designated in writing by a worker or handler to exercise a
right of access on behalf of the worker or handler to request and obtain a copy of the pesticide application
and hazard information required by 170.309(h).
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 76 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
Early entry — means entry by a worker into a treated area on the agricultural establishment after a
pesticide application is complete, but before any restricted-entry interval for the pesticide has expired.
Employ - means to obtain, directly or through a labor contractor, the services of a person in exchange for
a salary or wages, including piece-rate wages, without regard to who may pay or who may receive the
salary or wages. It includes obtaining the services of a self-employed person, an independent contractor,
or a person compensated by a third party, except that it does not include an agricultural employer
obtaining the services of a handler through a commercial pesticide handler employer or a commercial
pesticide handling establishment.
Enclosed cab — means a cab with a nonporous barrier that totally surrounds the occupant(s) of the cab
and prevents dermal contact with pesticides that are being applied outside of the cab.
Enclosed space production — means production of an agricultural plant indoors or in a structure or space
that is covered in whole or in part by any nonporous covering and that is large enough to permit a person
to enter.
Fumigant — means any pesticide product that is a vapor or gas, or forms a vapor or gas upon application,
and whose pesticidal action is achieved through the gaseous or vapor state.
Hand labor — means any agricultural activity performed by hand or with hand tools that causes a worker
to have substantial contact with plants, plant parts, or soil and other surfaces that may contain pesticide
residues, except that hand labor does not include operating, moving, or repairing irrigation or watering
equipment or performing crop advisor tasks.
Handler — means any person, including a self-employed person, who is employed by an agricultural
employer or commercial pesticide handler employer and performs any of the following activities:
(1)	Mixing, loading, or applying pesticides.
(2)	Disposing of pesticides.
(3)	Handling opened containers of pesticides, emptying, triple-rinsing, or cleaning pesticide
containers according to pesticide product labeling instructions, or disposing of pesticide
containers that have not been cleaned. The term does not include any person who is only handling
unopened pesticide containers or pesticide containers that have been emptied or cleaned
according to pesticide product labeling instructions.
(4)	Acting as a flagger.
(5)	Cleaning, adjusting, handling, or repairing the parts of mixing, loading, or application
equipment that may contain pesticide residues.
(6)	Assisting with the application of pesticides.
(7)	Entering an enclosed space after the application of a pesticide and before the inhalation
exposure level listed in the labeling has been reached or one of the ventilation criteria established
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 77 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
by §170.405(b)(3) or the labeling has been met to operate ventilation equipment, monitor air
levels, or adjust or remove coverings used in fumigation.
(8)	Entering a treated area outdoors after application of any soil fumigant during the labeling-
specified entry-restricted period to adjust or remove coverings used in fumigation.
(9)	Performing tasks as a crop advisor during any pesticide application or restricted-entry interval,
or before the inhalation exposure level listed in the pesticide product labeling has been reached or
one of the ventilation criteria established by § 170.405(b)(3) or the pesticide product labeling has
been met.
Handler employer — means any person who is self-employed as a handler or who employs any handler.
Immediate family — is limited to the spouse, parents, stepparents, foster parents, father-in-law, mother-
in-law, children, stepchildren, foster children, sons-in-law, daughters-in-law, grandparents, grandchildren,
brothers, sisters, brothers-in-law, sisters-in-law, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews, and first cousins. "First
cousin" means the child of a parent's sibling, i.e., the child of an aunt or uncle.
Labor contractor — means a person, other than a commercial pesticide handler, who employs workers or
handlers to perform tasks on an agricultural establishment for an agricultural employer or a commercial
pesticide handler employer.
Outdoor production — means production of an agricultural plant in an outside area that is not enclosed or
covered in any way that would obstruct the natural air flow.
Owner — means any person who has a present possessory interest (e.g., fee, leasehold, rental, or other) in
an agricultural establishment. A person who has both leased such agricultural establishment to another
person and granted that same person the right and full authority to manage and govern the use of such
agricultural establishment is not an owner for purposes of this part.
Personal protective equipment — means devices and apparel that are worn to protect the body from
contact with pesticides or pesticide residues, including, but not limited to, coveralls, chemical-resistant
suits, chemical-resistant gloves, chemical-resistant footwear, respirators, chemical-resistant aprons,
chemical-resistant headgear, and protective eyewear.
Restricted-entry interval — means the time after the end of a pesticide application during which entry into
the treated area is restricted.
Safety data sheet — has the same meaning as the definition at 29 CFR 1900.1200(c).
Treated area — means any area to which a pesticide is being directed or has been directed.
Use — as in "to use a pesticide" means any of the following:
(1) Pre-application activities, including, but not limited to:
(i) Arranging for the application of the pesticide.
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 78 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
(ii) Mixing and loading the pesticide.
(iii) Making necessary preparations for the application of the pesticide, including
responsibilities related to worker notification, training of workers or handlers, providing
decontamination supplies, providing pesticide safety information and pesticide application
and hazard information, use and care of personal protective equipment, providing
emergency assistance, and heat stress management.
(2)	Application of the pesticide.
(3)	Post-application activities intended to reduce the risks of illness and injury resulting from
handlers' and workers' occupational exposures to pesticide residues during and after the
restricted-entry interval, including responsibilities related to worker notification, training of
workers or early-entry workers, providing decontamination supplies, providing pesticide safety
information and pesticide application and hazard information, use and care of personal protective
equipment, providing emergency assistance, and heat stress management.
(4)	Other pesticide-related activities, including, but not limited to, transporting or storing
pesticides that have been opened, cleaning equipment, and disposing of excess pesticides, spray
mix, equipment wash waters, pesticide containers, and other pesticide-containing materials.
Worker — means any person, including a self-employed person, who is employed and performs activities
directly relating to the production of agricultural plants on an agricultural establishment.
Worker housing area — means any place or area of land on or near an agricultural establishment where
housing or space for housing is provided for workers or handlers by an agricultural employer, owner, labor
contractor, or any other person responsible for the recruitment or employment of agricultural workers.
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 79 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
APPENDIX B: SAMPLE INSPECTION CHECKLISTS
Part 1: Agricultural Establishment Checklist
DATE
INSPECTION NUMBER
OWNER/OPERATOR
APPLICATOR
FIRM OR PREMISE NAME
Inspector Credentials Presented ~ Yes ~ No
Routine inspection ~
Notice of Inspection Provided ~ Yes ~ No
For Cause inspection ~
A. AGRICULTURAL ESTABLISHMENT INFORMATION
Immediate Family Exemption Criteria for Workers and Handlers 170.305,170.601(a)
Are ALL the workers and handlers the owner (or majority owner) or immediate family? Exemption applies to:
spouses, children, step children, foster children, sons-in-law, daughters-in-law, grandchildren, parents, step
parents, foster parents, grandparents, fathers-in-law, mothers-in-law, aunts, uncles, brothers, sisters, brothers-in-
law, sisters-in-law, nieces, nephews, first cousins.
Workers: Yes ~ Handlers: Yes ~
If both answers are "yes", stop using this form and use checklist, "Owners of Agricultural Establishments and
Immediate Family."
If one answer is "no," continue to use this checklist as appropriate.	
B. RECORDS REVIEW:
Pesticide Application Information and SDSs 170.311(b)
WPS Requirement
Reference
Page in How To
Comply
Regulatory
Citation
~Yes DNo
Are pesticide application information and SDSs
retained on the establishment for 2 years? (safety
data sheet, product name, EPA registration number,
active ingredient, crop or site treated, location and
description of treated area, date, start and end time
of application, duration of REI)
24
170.311(b)
Identify WPS pesticides applied or REI in effect in the past 30 days (minimum of 3 products if possible) through a
record review, interview and visual inspection of products in storage, and record as appropriate to facilitate the
inspection: product name/#; date applied; method of application; special requirements; weather conditions
during application; PPE required; REI (record and attach).
Pesticide Safety Training Records 170.401(d), 170.501(d)
Worker Training Records
~Yes DNo
~Yes DNo
Current workers trained in past 12 months?
Records retained for 2 years on establishment?
(worker name, signature, date of training, EPA-
approved materials, trainer's name, trainer's
qualifications, name of ag employer)
27
27-28
170.401(a)
170.401(d)
Handler Training Records
~Yes DNo
Current handlers trained in past 12 months?
27
170.501(a)
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 80 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
~Yes DNo
Records retained for 2 years on establishment?
(handler name, signature, date of training, EPA-
approved materials, trainer's name, trainer's
qualifications, name of ag employer)
27-28
170.501(d)
Respirator Records 170.507(b)(10)
~Yes DNo HUN/A
Are respirator records retained on the establishment
for 2 years?
68
170.507(b)(10)
~Yes DNo DN/A
Have handlers received medical evaluation, fit
testing and training for required respirator?
68
170.507(b)(10)
Access and Availability of Records 170.311(b)(7) through (9)
~Yes DNo DN/A
Has a worker, handler, or designated representative
requested application information orSDS? If so, was
it provided within 15 days of receipt of request?
Have treating medical personnel requested
application information orSDS? If so, was it
provided promptly?
25
170.311(b)(7)-(9)
C. MINIMUM AGE FOR HANDLERS AND EARLY ENTRY WORKERS 170.309(c)

WPS Requirement
Reference
Page in How
To Comply
Regulatory
Citation
~Yes DNo
Are all handlers and early entry workers at least 18
years of age?
20
170.309(c),
170.605(a)
D. INFORMATION DISPLAY
Location of the "Central Display" 170.311(a)(5), 170.311(b)(2) and (3)
Inspector observation ~ Based on interview ~

WPS Requirement
Reference
Page in How
To Comply
Regulatory
Citation
~Yes DNo
Has an appropriate central display been established
at a central location in an area where workers and
handlers are likely to congregate or pass by and is it
accessible during work hours?
21
170.311(a)(5),
170.311(b)(2) &
(3)
WPS Safety Information Display 170.311(a)
~Yes DNo
Is the EPA WPS safety poster (or equivalent)
displayed in central location, easily accessible, and
legible?
Is all required WPS safety information being
provided at the central display?
Are the name, address and phone number of an
emergency medical facility displayed?
Are the name, address and phone number of the
state/tribal pesticide agency displayed?
Are any changes to required information made
within 24 hours of receiving notice of changes?
21-23
170.311(a)
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 81 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
~Yes DNo
Is the pesticide safety information displayed where
decontamination supplies are located at permanent
sites and provided at locations where a toilet is
provided for 11 or more workers (as required by
OSHA Field Sanitation Standards, 29 CFR, Part
1928.110)?
21
170.311(a)
Pesticide Application and Hazard Information (SDS) Display 170.311(b)(1)-
5)
~Yes DNo
Is all required pesticide application information
provided at central location? Including:
Crop or site treated and location and description of
treated area, date(s) of application, start and end
times, pesticide product name, active ingredient(s),
EPA reg. no., re-entry interval (if any)
21
170.311(b)(l)-(5)
~Yes DNo
Is the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for each pesticide
made available?
21
170.311(b)(l)-(5)
~Yes DNo
Is the application information and SDS displayed no
later than 24 hours after the end of the applications
(but before workers enter the treated area) and kept
posted for 30 days after the last RE 1 expiration if
workers/handlers are present?
22
170.311(b)(l)-(5)
~Yes DNo
Are the application information and SDSs easily
accessible and legible?
22
170.311(b)(l)-(5)
E. KNOWLEDGE OF LABELING, APPLICATION- AND ESTABLISHMENT-SPECIFIC INFORMATION 170.403(a)-(c)
and 170.503(a) and (b)
Inspector observation ~ Based on interview ~

WPS Requirement
Reference
Page in How
To Comply
Regulatory
Citation
~Yes DNo
Before a handler performed any handler activity, did
the agricultural employer ensure the handler read
applicable portions of the label on safe use or was
informed in a manner the handler can understand?
59
170.503(a)(1)
~Yes DNo
Did the handler have access to the labeling at all
times, and was the handler aware of any entry
restrictions, application exclusion zone and REI?
59
170.503(a)(2) &
(3)
~Yes DNo
Before any worker performs any activity in a treated
area where within the last 30 days a pesticide
product has been used or an REI has been in effect
or any handler performs any handler activity, has
the employer informed workers and handlers in a
manner workers and handlers can understand, of
the location of pesticide safety information,
pesticide application and SDSs, and decontamination
supplies?
30
170.403(a)-(c),
170.503(b)
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 82 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
F. WORKER DECONTAMINATION 170.411
Inspector observation ~ Based on interview ~

WPS Requirement
Reference
Page in How
To Comply
Regulatory
Citation
~Yes DNo HUN/A
Are the appropriate decontamination supplies
provided? Including: 1 gallon of water provided for
each worker at the beginning of work period and
replenished to maintain adequate supply, soap,
single-use towels?
48
170.411(b)
~Yes DNo HUN/A
If REI is 4 hours or less, are the decontamination
supplies provided for 7 days? Or 30 days if REI is
more than 4 hours?
48
170.411(c)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
Are decontamination supplies located within 1/4
mile of the work site or nearest site of vehicular
access and outside a pesticide treated area under an
REI and reasonably accessible?
48
170.411(d)
G. HANDLER DECONTAMINATION AND EYEWASH SUPPLIES 170.509
Inspector observation ~ Based on interview ~

WPS Requirement
Reference
Page in How
To Comply
Regulatory
Citation
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
Are decontamination supplies located at mixing
sites?
75
170.509(c)(1)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
For all other handler tasks, are decontamination
supplies located within 1/4 mile from handler or
nearest place of vehicular access? Are supplies
located outside a treated area or area under REI or
in a closed container protected from pesticide
contamination?
75
170.509(c)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
Are the appropriate decontamination supplies
provided? Including 3 gallons of water provided for
each handler (at the beginning of work period and
replenished to maintain adequate supply), soap,
single use towels, and a change of clothes?
74
170.509(b)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
At each mixing/loading site for products requiring
eye protection or using a closed system under
pressure is there an appropriate eyewash system
immediately available to a handler? (Either a system
to deliver gently running water (at a rate of 0.4
gal/min) for 15 minutes or at least 6 gallons in
containers suitable for providing a gentle eye-flush
for about 15 minutes)
74
170.509(d)(1)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
Does each applicator have at least one pint of water
immediately available in a portable container when
pesticide label requires eye protection?
74
170.509(d)(2)
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 83 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
H. APPLICATION RESTRICTIONS AND HANDLER PROTECTIONS 170.405 and 170.505
Inspector observation ~ Based on interview ~

WPS Requirement
Reference
Page in How
To Comply
Regulatory
Citation
~Yes DNo HUN/A
Do all handlers observed by the inspector appear to
be over 18?
20
170.309(c)
~Yes DNo HUN/A
Did the handler suspend application because
someone was in the application exclusion zone? (for
enclosed space, in area in column B in Table in
170.405(b)(4)) and was the application continued
properly?
60-61
170.505(b)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
Was each pesticide applied so that it did not contact,
either directly or through drift, anyone except
appropriately trained and equipped handlers?
60
170.505(a)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
If toxic product with skull & crossbones symbol was
used, was contact with the handler made at least
every 2 hours by voice, sight or another appropriate
method?
61
170.505(c)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
If a fumigant was applied in an enclosed space, was
continuous visual or voice contact with another
handler equipped with PPE maintained? Did the
handler outside the enclosed space have immediate
access to required PPE in case a rescue is required?
61
170.505(d)
Entry Restrictions
~Yes ~ NoDN/A
For enclosed space production applications, were
workers and other persons kept out of restricted
areas for the times specified in the table in
170.405(b)(4) during the application other than
appropriately trained and equipped handlers
involved in the application?
For outdoor production applications, were workers
and other persons (other than appropriately trained
and equipped handlers involved with the
application) kept out of the treated area and
application exclusion zone?
37-40
170.405
1. NOTIFICATION AND ENTRY RESTRICTIONS
Entry Restrictions after Applications 170.407
Inspector observation ~ Based on interview ~

WPS Requirement
Reference
Page in How
To Comply
Regulatory
Citation
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
After application of any pesticide to an outdoor
production area, does the employer not allow any
worker to enter or remain in the treated area before
the REI has expired and all warning signs have been
removed or covered? (except for permitted early
entry activities)
41
170.407(a)
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 84 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
~Yes DNo HUN/A
After application of any pesticide to an area of
enclosed space production, does the employer not
allow any worker to enter or remain in the area
specified in Table 1 in 170.405(b)(4) before the REI
has expired and all warning signs have been
removed or covered? (except for permitted early
entry activities)
41
170.407(b)
Posting & Notification 170.409
Inspector observation ~ Based on interview ~

WPS Requirement
Reference
Page in How
To Comply
Regulatory
Citation
~Yes DNo HUN/A
For any double notification pesticide (highly toxic):
Was notification provided both orally and by
posting? Did the oral notification meet the
requirements for outdoor or enclosed space
production areas?
Did the oral notification include the location, dates
and times of restrictions? Did the oral notification
include instructions about the restriction in a
manner that was understandable to workers?
Was the oral notification provided before the
application or at the time a worker begins their work
period?
Did the posting meet the requirements for outdoor
or enclosed space production areas?
Did signs meet the size and content requirements?
Were signs posted in adequate locations?
Were signs posted no sooner than 24 hours but
before the application? Did signs remain posted until
REI expired? Were signs removed within 3 days of
REI expiration (or was no entry ensured)?
42
170.409(a)(l)(i)
~Yes HHNo DN/A
For any outdoor production area applications with
REI of 48 hours or less, was either oral notification
or posted warning signs used? If oral notification:
Did the notification include the location, dates and
times of restrictions?
Did the notification include instructions about the
restriction that was understandable to workers?
Was the notification provided before the application
or at the time a worker begins their work period?
If posted warning signs:
Did signs meet the size and content requirements?
Were signs posted in adequate locations?
Were signs posted no sooner than 24 hours but
before the application?
Did signs remain posted until REI expired?
Were signs removed within 3 days of REI expiration
(or was no entry ensured)?
42
170.409(a)(l)(iii)
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 85 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
~Yes DNo HUN/A
For any outdoor production area applications with
REI greater than 48 hours were posted warning
signs used?
Did signs meet the size and content requirements?
Were signs posted in adequate locations?
Were signs posted no sooner than 24 hours but
before the application? Did signs remain posted until
REI expired? Were signs removed within 3 days of
REI expiration (or was no entry ensured)?
42
170.409(a)(l)(ii)
~Yes DNo HUN/A
For any enclosed space production area
applications with REI greater than 4 hours were
posted warning signs used?
Did signs meet the size and content requirements?
Were signs posted in adequate locations?
Were signs posted no sooner than 24 hours but
before the application?
Did signs remain posted until REI expired?
Were signs removed within 3 days of REI expiration
(or was no entry ensured)?
42
170.409(a)(l)(iv)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
For any enclosed space production area
applications with REI of 4 hours or less was either
oral notification or posted warning signs used?
If oral notification:
Did notification include the location, dates and times
of the restriction?
Did notification include instructions about the
restriction in a manner that were understandable to
the workers?
Was the notification provided before the application
or at the time a worker begins their work period?
If posted warning signs:
Did signs meet the size and content requirements?
Were signs posted in adequate locations?
Were signs posted no sooner than 24 hours but
before the application?
Did signs remain posted until REI expired?
Were signs removed within 3 days of REI expiration
(or was no entry ensured)?
43
170.409(a)(l)(v)
J. INFORMATION EXCHANGE 170.309(k), 170.313(i)
Inspector observation ~ Based on interview ~

WPS Requirement
Reference
Page in How
To Comply
Regulatory
Citation
If agricultural employer is employing a commercial handler to make applications:
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
Does the agricultural employer give the location and
description of treated areas or REIs and restrictions
near (within 1/4 mile) those areas where
applications are or will be made on their
establishment to a commercial pesticide handler
employer?
83
170.309(k)
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 86 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
~Yes DNo HUN/A
Does the commercial pesticide handler employer
inform the agricultural employer of: location and
description of areas to be treated, date and time of
application, product name, registration number,
active ingredient, REI, requirement for oral and/or
written notification, and any other restrictions?
84
170.313(i)
K. PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (PPE) 170.507
Inspector observation ~ Based on interview ~

WPS Requirement
Reference
Page in How
To Comply
Regulatory
Citation
For pesticide products reviewed:
~Yes DNo HUN/A
Did the handlers use the clothing and PPE specified
on the product labeling?
62
170.507(a)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
Did the agricultural employer provide clean,
operational PPE to the handler to meet label
requirements?
62-64
170.507(b)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
Before each day of use, did the agricultural
employer ensure all PPE was inspected and repaired
or discarded as appropriate?
64
170.507(c)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
Did the agricultural employer assure that handler
wears and uses PPE correctly?
64
170.507(c)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
Is the PPE properly cleaned and thoroughly dried
before storage? Is clean PPE stored separately from
personal clothing and contaminated areas? Is there
a clean place for putting on and removing PPE?
64
170.507(d)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
Where labeling requires PPE for handler activities,
did the agricultural employer take sufficient
measures to prevent heat-related illness and instruct
each handler in the prevention, recognition and first
aid treatment of heat-related illness?
65
170.507(e)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
If respirators are required and handlers are present,
did handlers receive medical clearance, fit testing
and training?
68
170.507(b)(10)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
If using particulate filtering facepiece respirators, are
they replaced appropriately? (i.e., breathing
resistance excessive; filter is damaged; according to
respirator or product label; after 8 hours of use)
73
170.507(d)(6)
~Yes DNo HUN/A
If using vapor-removing canister/cartridge
respirators, are they replaced appropriately? (based
on odor, taste, irritation; breathing resistance
excessive; according to respirator or pesticide
product label; after 8 hours of use)
73
170.507(d)
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 87 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
L PESTICIDE HANDLING EQUIPMENT 170.313(f), (g) and (1) and 170.309(i) and (j)
Inspector observation ~ Based on interview ~

WPS Requirement
Reference
Page in How
To Comply
Regulatory
Citation
~Yes DNo HUN/A
Before use, did the agricultural employer instruct
handlers in the safe operation of application and
mixing/loading equipment and inspect and repair
application and mixing/loading equipment before
each day of use?
79
170.313 (f) & (g)
~Yes DNo HUN/A
Has any person employed by the agricultural
establishment, who cleans, repairs, or adjusts the
pesticide equipment, been trained as a handler?
20
170.309(g)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
If any persons not employed by the agricultural
establishment, clean, repair, or adjust the pesticide
equipment, are they provided the following
information: that the equipment may be
contaminated; potential harmful effects of pesticide
exposure; how to limit exposure; and how to wash
to remove contamination?
20
170.309(g)
M. EARLY ENTRY
Entry Restrictions 170.605
Inspector observation ~ Based on interview ~

WPS Requirement
Reference
Page in How
To Comply
Regulatory
Citation
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
Do all early entry workers appear to be at least 18?
52
170.605(a)
170.309(c)
~Yes DNo HUN/A
Prior to early entry, did the employer provide the
following information in a manner understandable
to the workers: location of early entry area where
work is to be performed; pesticides applied;
dates and time the REI begins and ends; which
exception is the basis for early entry and tasks that
may be performed; whether contact with treated
surfaces is allowed; amount of time allowed in the
treated area; PPE required by the label for early
entry; location of pesticide safety information and
decontamination supplies?
52
170.605(b)
~Yes DNo HUN/A
Prior to early entry, did the employer ensure that
each early entry worker has either read the product
labeling or has been informed in a manner that is
understandable, of all labeling requirements and
statements related to human hazards or
precautions, first aid or user safety?
52
170.605(c)
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 88 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
~Yes DNo HUN/A
Prior to early entry, did the employer ensure each
early entry worker is provided with the required
PPE, that it is used as intended and is properly
maintained?
53
170.605(d)
~Yes DNo HUN/A
Prior to early entry, did the employer take sufficient
measures to prevent heat-related illness and instruct
each worker in the prevention, recognition and first
aid treatment of heat-related illness?
53
170.605(f)
~Yes HHNo DN/A
Are decontamination supplies located outside any
treated area or area under REI or where reasonably
accessible to workers conducting early entry tasks?
54
170.605(h)
~Yes HHNo DN/A
Are decontamination supplies located where a
worker removes personal protective equipment?
54
170.605(j)
~Yes HHNo DN/A
Are the appropriate decontamination supplies
provided: 3 gallons of water for each early entry
worker (at the beginning of work period and
replenished to maintain adequate supply); soap and
single use towels?
54
170.605(j)
~Yes HHNo DN/A
Does each worker have at least one pint of water
immediately available for eye-flushing in a portable
container when pesticide label requires eye
protection?
54
170.605(i)
Exception for Activities with No Contact 170.603(a)
~Yes HHNo DN/A
If using the no contact exception, are all the required
conditions met: no contact with anything treated
with the pesticide even if wearing PPE; no entry
before inhalation or ventilation criteria met?
49
170.603(a)
Exception for Limited Contact and Irrigation Activities 170.603(d)
~Yes HHNo DN/A
If using the exception for limited contact and
irrigation activities, are all the required conditions
met: entry must not occur during first 4 hours or
before inhalation or ventilation criteria met; no hand
labor activity was performed; time did not exceed 8
hours in 24-hour period; a double notification
pesticide was not used; situation could not have
been foreseen (except irrigation tasks); not doing
the activity would result in substantial economic
loss?
51
170.603(d)
Exception for Short Term Activities 170.603(b)
~Yes HHNo DN/A
If using the short-term activity exception, were all
the required conditions met: entry did not occur
during first 4 hours or before inhalation or
ventilation criteria met; no hand labor activity was
performed; time did not exceed 1 hour in 24?
49
170.603(b)
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 89 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
Exception for Agricultural Emergency 170.603(c)
~Yes DNo HUN/A
If agriculture emergency exception, were all
required conditions met: situation meets criteria for
agricultural emergency; entry did not occur during
first 4 hours or before inhalation or ventilation
criteria met; if double notification pesticide was
used, time did not exceed 4 hours in 24-hour
period?
50
170.603(c)
N. EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE 170.309(f)
~Yes DNo HUN/A
Has a worker or handler experienced potential
pesticide exposure during or within 72 hours after
employment? If so, was transportation to an
emergency medical care facility provided and
information (SDS, circumstances of application and
exposure) provided to medical personnel?
26
170.309(f)
O. ANTI-RETALIATION 170.315
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
Based on information available, no person was
threatened, intimidated, coerced, discriminated
against or experienced retaliation for complying
with or attempting to comply with WPS
requirements, or for providing information
regarding violative behavior. Check Yes if this is
correct.
33
170.315
DISPOSITION OF INSPECTION
Describe any observations made during the inspection that may require additional attention. Attach relevant
documentation.
Inspector Signature:
Date:
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 90 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
Part 2: Commercial Pesticide Handling Establishment Checklist
DATE
INSPECTION NUMBER
OWNER/OPERATOR
APPLICATOR
FIRM OR PREMISE NAME
Inspector Credentials Presented DYes ~ No Routine Inspection ~
Notice of Inspection Provided DYes ~ No For Cause Inspection ~
A. RECORDS REVIEW 170.501 and 170.507(b)( 10)

WPS Requirement
Reference
Page in How
To Comply
Regulatory
Citation
Handler Pesticide Safety Training Records 170.501
~Yes DNo
Current handlers trained in past 12 months?
28
170.501(a)
~Yes DNo
Records retained on the establishment for 2 years?
(handler name, signature, date of training, EPA-
approved materials, trainer's name, trainer's
qualifications, name of commercial pesticide handler
employer)
28
170.501(d)
Respirator Records 170.507(b)(10)
~Yes DNo DN/A
Are respirator records retained on establishment for 2
years?
72 & 73
170.507(b)(10)
~Yes DNo DN/A
Have handlers received medical evaluation, fit testing,
and training for required respirator?
72 & 73
170.507(b)(10)
B. MINIMUM AGE FOR HANDLERS 170.313(c)

WPS Requirement
Reference
Page in How
To Comply
Regulatory
Citation
~Yes DNo
Are all handlers at least 18 years of age?
20
170.313(c)
C. WPS PESTICIDE APPLICATIONS
Identify recent WPS pesticide applications through a record review, interview and visual inspection of products in
storage and record as appropriate to facilitate the inspection: product name/reg. no., date applied, method of
application, special requirements, weather conditions during application, PPE required, REI (record and attach).
D. INFORMATION EXCHANGE 170.309(k) & 170.313 (h)-(j)

WPS Requirement
Reference
Page in How
To Comply
Regulatory
Citation
~Yes DNo DN/A
Where applicable, does the agricultural employer give
the location and description of treated areas or REIs
and restrictions near (within 1/4 mile) those areas
where applications are or will be made on their
establishment to the commercial pesticide handler
employer?
31 & 32
170.309(k)
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 91 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
~Yes DNo HUN/A
Does the commercial pesticide handler employer
provide this information about the areas with entry
restrictions to the handler who worked on the
agricultural establishment?
31 & 32
170.313(h)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
Does the commercial pesticide handler employer
inform the agricultural employer of the location and
description of areas to be treated, date and time of
application, product name, registration number, active
ingredient, REI, requirement for oral or written
notification, and any other restrictions?
31 & 32
170.313(i)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
If there are changes to the location or description of
the area to be treated, the REI, the notification
requirements, restrictions or use directions, or if the
start time will be earlier than scheduled, was updated
information provided before the application? If there
were changes to any other information, was updated
information provided to the agricultural employer
within 2 hours after completing the application?
31 & 32
170.313(j)
E. KNOWLEDGE OF LABELING AND APPLICATION SPECIFIC INFORMATION 170.503

WPS Requirement
leference Page
in How To
Comply
Regulatory
Citation
~Yes HHNo
Before a handler performed any handler activity, did
the commercial pesticide handler employer ensure
the handler read applicable portions of the label on
safe use or was informed in a manner the handler
can understand?
59
170.503(a)
~Yes HHNo
Did the handler have access to the label at all times,
and was the handler aware of any entry restrictions,
AEZ and REIs?
59
170.503(a)
F. HANDLER DECONTAMINATION AND EYEWASH SUPPLIES 170.509
Inspector observation ~ Based on interview ~

WPS Requirement
Reference
Page in How
To Comply
Regulatory
Citation
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
Are decontamination supplies located at mixing sites?
74 & 75
170.509(c)(1)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
For all other handler tasks, are decontamination
supplies located within 1/4 mile from handler or
nearest place of vehicular access? Are the supplies
located outside a treated area or area under a REI or
in a closed container protected from pesticide
contamination?
74 & 75
170.509(c)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
Are the appropriate decontamination supplies
provided: including 3 gallons of water provided for
each handler (at the beginning of work period and
replenished to maintain adequate supply), soap,
single use towels, and a change of clothes?
74 & 75
170.509(b)
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 92 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
~Yes DNo HUN/A
At each mixing/loading site for products requiring eye
protection or using a closed system under pressure is
there an appropriate eyewash system immediately
available to a handler? (Either a system to deliver
gently running water (at a rate of 0.4 gal/min) for 15
minutes or at least 6 gallons in containers suitable for
providing a gentle eye-flush for about 15 minutes)
74 & 75
170.509(d)(1)
~Yes DNo HUN/A
Does each applicator have at least one pint of water
immediately available in a portable container when
pesticide label requires eye protection?
74 & 75
170.509(d)(2)
G. PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (PPE) 170.507(a)-(d)
Inspector observation ~ Based on interview ~
For pesticide products on site or recently applied

WPS Requirement
Reference
Page in How
To Comply
Regulatory
Citation
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
Did the handlers use the clothing and PPE specified
on the product labeling?
62
170.507(a)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
Did the commercial pesticide handler employer
provide clean, operational PPE to the handler to meet
label requirements?
62 & 63
170.507(b)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
Before each day of use, did the commercial pesticide
handler employer ensure all PPE was inspected and
repaired or discarded as appropriate?
64
170.507(c)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
Did the commercial pesticide handler employer
assure that handler wears and uses PPE correctly?
64
170.507(c)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
Is the PPE properly cleaned and thoroughly dried
before storage? Is clean PPE stored separately from
personal clothing and contaminated areas? Is there a
clean place for putting on and removing PPE?
64
170.507(d)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
Where labeling requires PPE for handler activities, did
the commercial pesticide handler employer take
sufficient measures to prevent heat-related illness
and instruct each handler in the prevention,
recognition and first aid treatment of heat-related
illness?
65
170.507(e)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
If respirators are required and handlers are present,
did handlers receive medical evaluation, fit testing
and training?
68
170.507(b)(10)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
If using particulate filtering facepiece respirators, are
they replaced appropriately? (i.e., breathing
resistance excessive; filter is damaged; according to
respirator or product label; after 8 hours of use)
73
170.507(d)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
If using vapor-removing canister/cartridge
respirators, are they replaced appropriately? (based
on odor, taste, irritation; breathing resistance
excessive; according to respirator or pesticide
product label; after 8 hours of use)
73
170.507(d)
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 93 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
H. PESTICIDE HANDLING EQUIPMENT 170.313(f), (g) and (1)
Inspector observation ~ Based on interview ~

WPS Requirement
Reference
Page in How
To Comply
Regulatory
Citation
~Yes DNo HUN/A
Before use, did the commercial pesticide handler
employer instruct handlers in the safe operation of
application and mixing/loading equipment and
inspect and repair application and mixing/loading
equipment before each day of use?
79
170.313(f)
&
170.313(g)
~Yes DNo HUN/A
Has any person employed by the commercial
pesticide handling establishment, who cleans, repairs,
or adjusts the pesticide equipment, been trained as a
handler?
79
170.313(1)
~Yes DNo HUN/A
If persons not employed by the commercial pesticide
handling establishment clean, repair, or adjust the
pesticide equipment, are they provided with the
following information: that the equipment may be
contaminated; potential harmful effects of pesticide
exposure; how to limit exposure; and how to wash to
remove contamination?
79
170.313(1)
1. APPLICATION RESTRICTIONS AND HANDLER PROTECTIONS 170.313(c) & 170.505 (a)-(d)
Inspector observation ~ Based on interview ~

WPS Requirement
Reference
Page in How
To Comply
Regulatory
Citation
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
Do all handlers observed by the inspector appear to
be over 18?
20
170.313(c)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
Did the handler suspend application because
someone was in the AEZ? (for enclosed space, see
area in column B in table in 170.405(b)(4)) and was
the application continued properly?
60
170.505(b)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
Was each pesticide applied so that it did not contact,
either directly or through drift, anyone except
appropriately trained and equipped handlers?
60
170.505(a)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
If toxic product with skull-and-crossbones symbol was
used, was contact made at least every 2 hours by
voice, sight or another appropriate method?
61
170.505(c)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
If a fumigant was applied in an enclosed space, was
continuous visual or voice contact with another
handler equipped with PPE maintained? Did the
handler outside the enclosed space have immediate
access to required PPE in case a rescue is required?
61
170.505(d)
J. EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE 170.313(k)

WPS Requirement
Reference Page
in How To
Comply
Regulatory
Citation
~Yes HHNo
Has a handler experienced potential pesticide
exposure during or within 72 hours after employment?
If so, was transportation to an emergency medical care
facility provided and information (SDS, circumstances
of application and exposure) provided to medical
personnel?
80
170.313(k)
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 94 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
K. ANTI-RETALIATION 170.315
WPS Requirement
Reference
Page in How
To Comply
Regulatory
Citation
~Yes DNo
Based on information available, no person was
threatened, intimidated, coerced, discriminated
against or experienced retaliation for complying with
or attempting to comply with WPS requirements, or
for providing information regarding violative behavior.
Check yes if correct.
85
170.315
DISPOSITION OF INSPECTION
Describe any observations made during the inspection that may require additional attention. Attach any relevant
documentation.
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Page 95 of 113
EPA	Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
Effective Date: 8/15/2018	OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
WORKER PROTECTION STANDARD INSPECTION WORKSHEET
Part 3: Owners of Agricultural Establishments and Immediate Family
DATE
INSPECTION NUMBER
OWNER/OPERATOR
APPLICATOR
FIRM OR PREMISE NAME
Inspector Credentials Presented ~ Yes ~ No Routine Inspection ~
Notice of Inspection Provided ~ Yes ~ No For Cause Inspection ~
A. AGRICULTURAL ESTABLISHMENT INFORMATION
Immediate Family Exemption Criteria for Workers and Handlers 170.305,170.601(a)
Are ALL the workers and handlers the owner (or majority owner) or owner's immediate family? Exemption applies to
spouse, children, stepchildren, foster children, sons-in-law, daughters-in-law, grandchildren, parents, stepparents, foster
parents, grandparents, fathers-in-law, mothers-in-law, aunts, uncles, brothers, sisters, brothers-in-law, sisters-in-law,
nieces, nephews, first cousins. If yes, use this checklist. If no, use "Agricultural Establishment" checklist.
B. APPLICATION RESTRICTIONS 170.405, 170.505
Inspector observation ~ Based on interview ~

WPS Requirement
Reference
Page in How
To Comply
Regulatory
Citation
~Yes DNo DN/A
For enclosed space production applications, were workers
and other persons (other than appropriately trained and
equipped handlers involved in the application) kept out of
restricted areas in table in 170.405(b)(4) during the
application?
For outdoor production applications, were workers and
other persons (other than appropriately trained and
equipped handlers involved with the application) kept out
of the treated area and application exclusion zone during
the application?
37-40
170.405
~Yes DNo DN/A
Did the handler suspend application because someone was
in the AEZ? (for enclosed space, see area in column B in
table in 170.405(b)(4)) and was the application continued
properly?
60-61
170.505(b)
~Yes DNo DN/A
Was each pesticide applied so that it did not contact, either
directly or through drift, anyone except appropriately
trained and equipped handlers?
60
170.505(a)
C. ENTRY RESTRICTIONS AFTER APPLICATIONS 170.407
Inspector observation ~ Based on interview ~

WPS Requirement
Reference
Page in How
To Comply
Regulatory
Citation
~Yes DNo DN/A
After application of any pesticide to an outdoor production
area, did the owner keep workers out of the treated area
before the REI has expired and all warning signs have been
removed or covered? (except for permitted early entry
activities)
41
170.407
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 96 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
~Yes DNo HUN/A
After application of any pesticide to an area of enclosed
space production, did the owner keep workers out of the
area specified in the table in 170.405(b)(4) before the RE 1
has expired and all warning signs have been removed or
covered? (except for permitted early entry activities)
41
170.407(b)
D. INFORMATION EXCHANGE 170.309(k), 170.313(1)
If agricultural employer is employing a commercial handler to make applications
Inspector observation ~ Based on interview ~

WPS Requirement
Reference
Page in How
To Comply
Regulatory
Citation
~Yes DNo HUN/A
Does the owner give to a commercial pesticide handler
employer the location and description of any treated areas
where an REI is in effect that the handler may be in (or
within 1/4 mile of) and any restrictions on entering those
areas?
31 & 83
170.309(k)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
Does the commercial pesticide handling establishment
inform the owner of location and description of areas to be
treated, date and time of application, product name,
registration number, active ingredient, REI, requirement for
oral or written notification, and any other restrictions?
31 & 84
170.313(i)&(j)
E. ENTRY RESTRICTIONS 170.603 and 170.605(d)
Inspector observation ~ Based on interview ~

WPS Requirement
Reference
Page in How
To Comply
Regulatory
Citation
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
Are any workers considered early-entry workers? If yes,
prior to early entry, did the employer ensure each early-
entry worker is provided with the required PPE, that it is
used as intended and is properly maintained?
49 & 53
170.603
&
170.605(d)
Exception for Limited Contact and Irrigation Activities 170.603(d)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
If using the exception for limited contact or irrigation
activities, are all the required conditions met? (entry must
not occur during first 4 hours or before inhalation or
ventilation criteria met; no hand labor activity was
performed; time did not exceed 8 hours in 24-hour period; a
double notification pesticide was not used; situation could
not have been foreseen (except irrigation tasks); not doing
the activity would result in substantial economic loss)
51
170.603(d)
Exception for Short Term Activities 170.603(b)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
If using the short-term activity exception, were all the
required conditions met? (entry did not occur during first 4
hours or before inhalation or ventilation criteria were met;
no hand labor activity was performed; time did not exceed 1
hour in 24 hours)
49
170.603(b)
Exception for Agricultural Emergency 170.603(c)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
If agriculture emergency exception, were all required
conditions met? (situation meets criteria for agricultural
emergency; entry did not occur during first 4 hours or
before inhalation or ventilation criteria were met; if double
notification pesticide was used, time did not exceed 4 hours
in 24 hours)
50
170.603(c)
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 97 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
F. PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT 170.507(a) and (b)
Inspector observation ~ Based on interview ~

WPS Requirement
Reference
Page in How
To Comply
Regulatory
Citation
~Yes DNo HUN/A
Did the handler employer/owner provide clean, operational
PPE to the handler to meet label requirements?
62
170.507(a)
~Yes DNo HUN/A
Did the handler use the clothing and PPE specified on the
pesticide product labeling?
62
170.507(a)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
If respirators are required and handlers are present, did
handlers receive medical evaluation, fit testing and training?
68-73
170.507(b)
~Yes HHNo HUN/A
If respirators are required, are medical evaluation, fit testing
and training records maintained on the establishment for 2
years?
68-73
170.507(b)
DISPOSITION OF INSPECTION
Describe any observations made during the inspection that may require additional attention. Attach any relevant
documentation.
Inspector Signature:
Date:
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 98 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
Part 4: Sample List of WPS Pesticide Products
WPS Pesticide Products
Product Name
Product
#
Date
Applied
Method of
Application
Special Requirements/
Restrictions
Weather
Conditions
PPE
Required
REI
























































































































































EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 99 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
APPENDIX C: OSHA REGULATIONS ON RESPIRATORS
Replacement of canisters or cartridges
The WPS regulations (§170.507(d)) refer to OSHA regulations in describing when gas- or vapor-
removing respirators must have canisters or cartridges replaced. The WPS regulations state that
canisters or cartridges must be replaced when:
•	There is the first indication of odor, taste, or irritation;
•	Maximum use time is reached as determined by a change schedule conforming to OSHA
29 CFR §1910.134(d)(3)(iii)(B)(2) (see below);
•	Breathing resistance is excessive;
•	Required by manufacturer's directions or the label; or
•	At the end of 8 hours of use if not earlier.
29 CFR §1910.134(d)(3)(iii)(B)(2)
If there is no end-of-service-life indicator (ESLI) appropriate for conditions in the employer's
workplace, the employer implements a change schedule for canisters and cartridges that is
based on objective information or data that will ensure that canisters and cartridges are
changed before the end of their service life. The employer shall describe in the respirator
program the information and data relied upon and the basis for the canister and cartridge
change schedule and the basis for reliance on the data.
Respirator medical evaluation, fit testing and training
The WPS regulations require a medical evaluation, fit testing and training before a handler
performs any handler activity where the respirator is required to be worn (§170.507(b)(10)(i)-
(iii)) and refer to OSHA regulations at §1910.134(e). These regulations are included below:
§1910.134(e)
Medical evaluation. Using a respirator may place a physiological burden on employees that
varies with the type of respirator worn, the job and workplace conditions in which the
respirator is used, and the medical status of the employee. Accordingly, this paragraph specifies
the minimum requirements for medical evaluation that employers must implement to
determine the employee's ability to use a respirator.
1910.134(e)(1)
General. The employer shall provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability
to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 100 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
workplace. The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the
employee is no longer required to use a respirator.
1910.134(e)(2)
Medical evaluation procedures.
1910.134(e)(2)(i)
The employer shall identify a physician or other licensed health care professional (PLHCP) to
perform medical evaluations using a medical questionnaire or an initial medical examination
that obtains the same information as the medical questionnaire.
1910.134(e)(2)(ii)
The medical evaluation shall obtain the information requested by the questionnaire in Sections
1 and 2, Part A of Appendix C of this section.
1910.134(e)(3)
Follow-up medical examination.
1910.134(e)(3)(i)
The employer shall ensure that a follow-up medical examination is provided for an employee
who gives a positive response to any question among questions 1 through 8 in Section 2, Part A
of Appendix C or whose initial medical examination demonstrates the need for a follow-up
medical examination.
1910.134(e)(3)(ii)
The follow-up medical examination shall include any medical tests, consultations, or diagnostic
procedures that the PLHCP deems necessary to make a final determination.
1910.134(e)(4)
Administration of the medical questionnaire and examinations.
1910.134(e)(4)(i)
The medical questionnaire and examinations shall be administered confidentially during the
employee's normal working hours or at a time and place convenient to the employee. The
medical questionnaire shall be administered in a manner that ensures that the employee
understands its content.
1910.134(e)(4)(ii)
The employer shall provide the employee with an opportunity to discuss the questionnaire and
examination results with the PLHCP.
1910.134(e)(5)
Supplemental information for the PLHCP.
1910.134(e)(5)(i)
The following information must be provided to the PLHCP before the PLHCP makes a
recommendation concerning an employee's ability to use a respirator:
1910.134(e)(5)(i)(A)
(A) The type and weight of the respirator to be used by the employee;
1910.134(e)(5)(i)(B)
The duration and frequency of respirator use (including use for rescue and escape);
Page 101 of 113
EPA	Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
Effective Date: 8/15/2018	OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
1910.134(e)(5)(i)(C)
The expected physical work effort;
1910.134(e)(5)(i)(D)
Additional protective clothing and equipment to be worn; and
1910.134(e)(5)(i)(E)
Temperature and humidity extremes that may be encountered.
1910.134(e)(5)(ii)
Any supplemental information provided previously to the PLHCP regarding an employee need
not be provided for a subsequent medical evaluation if the information and the PLHCP remain
the same.
1910.134(e)(5)(iii)
The employer shall provide the PLHCP with a copy of the written respiratory protection
program and a copy of this section.
Note to Paragraph (e)(5)(iii): When the employer replaces a PLHCP, the employer must ensure
that the new PLHCP obtains this information, either by providing the documents directly to the
PLHCP or having the documents transferred from the former PLHCP to the new PLHCP.
However, OSHA does not expect employers to have employees medically reevaluated solely
because a new PLHCP has been selected.
1910.134(e)(6)
Medical determination. In determining the employee's ability to use a respirator, the employer
shall:
1910.134(e)(6)(i)
Obtain a written recommendation regarding the employee's ability to use the respirator from
the PLHCP. The recommendation shall provide only the following information:
1910.134(e)(6)(i)(A)
Any limitations on respirator use related to the medical condition of the employee, or relating
to the workplace conditions in which the respirator will be used, including whether or not the
employee is medically able to use the respirator;
1910.134(e)(6)(i)(B)
The need, if any, for follow-up medical evaluations; and
1910.134(e)(6)(i)(C)
A statement that the PLHCP has provided the employee with a copy of the PLHCP's written
recommendation.
1910.134(e)(6)(ii)
If the respirator is a negative pressure respirator and the PLHCP finds a medical condition that
may place the employee's health at increased risk if the respirator is used, the employer shall
provide a PAPR if the PLHCP's medical evaluation finds that the employee can use such a
respirator; if a subsequent medical evaluation finds that the employee is medically able to use a
negative pressure respirator, then the employer is no longer required to provide a PAPR.
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 102 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
1910.134(e)(7)
Additional medical evaluations. At a minimum, the employer shall provide additional medical
evaluations that comply with the requirements of this section if:
1910.134(e)(7)(i)
An employee reports medical signs or symptoms that are related to ability to use a respirator;
1910.134(e)(7)(ii)
A PLHCP, supervisor, or the respirator program administrator informs the employer that an
employee needs to be reevaluated;
1910.134(e)(7)(iii)
Information from the respiratory protection program, including observations made during fit
testing and program evaluation, indicates a need for employee reevaluation; or
1910.134(e)(7)(iv)
A change occurs in workplace conditions (e.g., physical work effort, protective clothing,
temperature) that may result in a substantial increase in the physiological burden placed on an
employee.
1910.134(f)
Fit testing. This paragraph requires that, before an employee may be required to use any
respirator with a negative or positive pressure tight-fitting facepiece, the employee must be fit
tested with the same make, model, style, and size of respirator that will be used. This
paragraph specifies the kinds of fit tests allowed, the procedures for conducting them, and how
the results of the fit tests must be used.
1910.134(f)(1)
The employer shall ensure that employees using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator pass an
appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT) as stated in this paragraph.
1910.134(f)(2)
The employer shall ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator is fit
tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style,
model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter.
1910.134(f)(3)
The employer shall conduct an additional fit test whenever the employee reports, or the
employer, PLHCP, supervisor, or program administrator makes visual observations of, changes
in the employee's physical condition that could affect respirator fit. Such conditions include, but
are not limited to, facial scarring, dental changes, cosmetic surgery, or an obvious change in
body weight.
1910.134(f)(4)
If after passing a QLFT or QNFT, the employee subsequently notifies the employer, program
administrator, supervisor, or PLHCP that the fit of the respirator is unacceptable, the employee
shall be given a reasonable opportunity to select a different respirator facepiece and to be
retested.
1910.134(f)(5)
The fit test shall be administered using an OSHA-accepted QLFT or QNFT protocol. The OSHA-
accepted QLFT and QNFT protocols and procedures are contained in Appendix A of this section.
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 103 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
1910.134(f)(6)
QLFT may only be used to fit test negative pressure air-purifying respirators that must achieve a
fit factor of 100 or less.
1910.134(f)(7)
If the fit factor, as determined through an OSHA-accepted QNFT protocol, is equal to or greater
than 100 for tight-fitting half facepieces, or equal to or greater than 500 for tight-fitting full
facepieces, the QNFT has been passed with that respirator.
1910.134(f)(8)
Fit testing of tight-fitting atmosphere-supplying respirators and tight-fitting powered air-
purifying respirators shall be accomplished by performing quantitative or qualitative fit testing
in the negative pressure mode, regardless of the mode of operation (negative or positive
pressure) that is used for respiratory protection.
1910.134(f)(8)(i)
Qualitative fit testing of these respirators shall be accomplished by temporarily converting the
respirator user's actual facepiece into a negative pressure respirator with appropriate filters, or
by using an identical negative pressure air-purifying respirator facepiece with the same sealing
surfaces as a surrogate for the atmosphere-supplying or powered air-purifying respirator
facepiece.
1910.134(f)(8)(ii)
Quantitative fit testing of these respirators shall be accomplished by modifying the facepiece to
allow sampling inside the facepiece in the breathing zone of the user, midway between the
nose and mouth. This requirement shall be accomplished by installing a permanent sampling
probe onto a surrogate facepiece, or by using a sampling adapter designed to temporarily
provide a means of sampling air from inside the facepiece.
1910.134(f)(8)(iii)
Any modifications to the respirator facepiece for fit testing shall be completely removed, and
the facepiece restored to NIOSH-approved configuration, before that facepiece can be used in
the workplace.
1910.134(g)
Use of respirators. This paragraph requires employers to establish and implement procedures
for the proper use of respirators. These requirements include prohibiting conditions that may
result in facepiece seal leakage, preventing employees from removing respirators in hazardous
environments, taking actions to ensure continued effective respirator operation throughout the
work shift, and establishing procedures for the use of respirators in IDLH atmospheres or in
interior structural firefighting situations.
1910.134(g)(1)
Facepiece seal protection.
1910.134(g)(l)(i)
The employer shall not permit respirators with tight-fitting facepieces to be worn by employees
who have:
1910.134(g)(l)(i)(A)
Facial hair that comes between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that
interferes with valve function; or
Page 104 of 113
EPA	Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
Effective Date: 8/15/2018	OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
1910.134(g)(l)(i)(B)
Any condition that interferes with the face-to-facepiece seal or valve function.
1910.134(g)(l)(ii)
If an employee wears corrective glasses or goggles or other personal protective equipment, the
employer shall ensure that such equipment is worn in a manner that does not interfere with
the seal of the facepiece to the face of the user.
1910.134(g)(l)(iii)
For all tight-fitting respirators, the employer shall ensure that employees perform a user seal
check each time they put on the respirator using the procedures in Appendix B-l or procedures
recommended by the respirator manufacturer that the employer demonstrates are as effective
as those in Appendix B-l of this section.
1910.134(g)(2)
Continuing respirator effectiveness.
1910.134(g)(2)(i)
Appropriate surveillance shall be maintained of work area conditions and degree of employee
exposure or stress. When there is a change in work area conditions or degree of employee
exposure or stress that may affect respirator effectiveness, the employer shall reevaluate the
continued effectiveness of the respirator.
1910.134(g)(2)(ii)
The employer shall ensure that employees leave the respirator use area:
1910.134(g)(2)(ii)(A)
To wash their faces and respirator facepieces as necessary to prevent eye or skin irritation
associated with respirator use; or
1910.134(g)(2)(ii)(B)
If they detect vapor or gas breakthrough, changes in breathing resistance, or leakage of the
facepiece; or
1910.134(g)(2)(ii)(C)
To replace the respirator or the filter, cartridge, or canister elements.
1910.134(g)(2)(iii)
If the employee detects vapor or gas breakthrough, changes in breathing resistance, or leakage
of the facepiece, the employer must replace or repair the respirator before allowing the
employee to return to the work area.
Training Requirements
1910.134(k)
Training and information. This paragraph requires the employer to provide effective training to
employees who are required to use respirators. The training must be comprehensive,
understandable, and recur annually, and more often if necessary. This paragraph also requires
the employer to provide the basic information on respirators in Appendix D of this section to
employees who wear respirators when not required by this section or by the employer to do so.
1910.134(k)(l)
The employer shall ensure that each employee can demonstrate knowledge of at least the
following:
Page 105 of 113
EPA	Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
Effective Date: 8/15/2018	OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
1910.134(k)(l)(i)
Why the respirator is necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance can compromise
the protective effect of the respirator;
1910.134(k)(l)(ii)
What the limitations and capabilities of the respirator are;
1910.134(k)(l)(iii)
How to use the respirator effectively in emergency situations, including situations in which the
respirator malfunctions;
1910.134(k)(l)(iv)
How to inspect, put on and remove, use, and check the seals of the respirator;
1910.134(k)(l)(v)
What the procedures are for maintenance and storage of the respirator;
1910.134(k)(l)(vi)
How to recognize medical signs and symptoms that may limit or prevent the effective use of
respirators; and
1910.134(k)(l)(vii)
The general requirements of this section.
1910.134(k)(2)
The training shall be conducted in a manner that is understandable to the employee.
1910.134(k)(3)
The employer shall provide the training prior to requiring the employee to use a respirator in
the workplace.
1910.134(k)(4)
An employer who is able to demonstrate that a new employee has received training within the
last 12 months that addresses the elements specified in paragraph (k)(l)(i) through (vii) is not
required to repeat such training provided that, as required by paragraph (k)(l), the employee
can demonstrate knowledge of those element(s). Previous training not repeated initially by the
employer must be provided no later than 12 months from the date of the previous training.
1910.134(k)(5)
Retraining shall be administered annually, and when the following situations occur:
1910.134(k)(5)(i)
Changes in the workplace or the type of respirator render previous training obsolete;
1910.134(k)(5)(ii)
Inadequacies in the employee's knowledge or use of the respirator indicate that the employee
has not retained the requisite understanding or skill; or
1910.134(k)(5)(iii)
Any other situation arises in which retraining appears necessary to ensure safe respirator use.
1910.134(k)(6)
The basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of this section, shall
be provided by the employer in any written or oral format, to employees who wear respirators
when such use is not required by this section or by the employer.
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 106 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
APPENDIX D: TABLE —ENTRY RESTRICTIONS DURING
ENCLOSED SPACE PRODUCTION PESTICIDE APPLICATIONS
170.405(B)(4)
A. When a pesticide is
applied:
B. Workers and other
persons, other than
appropriately trained
and equipped
handlers, are
prohibited in:
C. Until:
D. After the
expiration of time
specified in column
C, the area subject
to the restricted-
entry interval is:
(1) As a fumigant
Entire enclosed space
plus any adjacent
structure or area that
cannot be sealed off
from the treated area
The ventilation
criteria of
paragraph (b)(3)0
of this section are
met
No post-application
entry restrictions
required by
§170.407 after
criteria in column C
are met.
(2) As a
(i)	Smoke, or
(ii)	Mist, or
(iii)	Fog, or
(iv)	As a spray using a
spray quality (droplet
spectrum) of smaller
than medium
Entire enclosed space
The ventilation
criteria of
paragraph (b)(3)"
of this section are
met
Entire enclosed
space.
(3) Not as in (1) or (2),
and for which a
respiratory protection
device is required for
application by the
pesticide product
labeling
Entire enclosed space
The ventilation
criteria of
paragraph (b)(3)°
of this section are
met
Treated area.
(4) Not as in (1), (2) or
(3), and:
(i) From a height of
greater than 12 inches
from the planting
medium, or
Treated area plus 25
feet in all directions of
the treated area, but
not outside the
enclosed space
Application is
complete
Treated area.
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 107 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
(ii) As a spray using a
spray quality (droplet
spectrum) of medium
or larger



5) Otherwise
Treated area
Application is
complete
Treated area.
a When Column C of the Table under paragraph (b)(4) of this section specifies that ventilation
criteria must be met, ventilation must continue until the air concentration is measured to be equal
to or less than the inhalation exposure level required by the labeling. If no inhalation exposure
level is listed on the labeling, ventilation must continue until after one of the following
conditions is met:
(i)	Ten air exchanges are completed.
(ii)	Two hours of ventilation using fans or other mechanical ventilating systems.
(iii)	Four hours of ventilation using vents, windows, or other passive ventilation.
(iv)	Eleven hours with no ventilation followed by one hour of mechanical ventilation.
(v)	Eleven hours with no ventilation followed by two hours of passive ventilation.
(vi)	Twenty-four hours with no ventilation.
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 108 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
APPENDIX E: WPS APPLICATION ZONE REQUIREMENTS
QUESTION AND ANSWER FACT SHEET
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Question and Answer Fact Sheet
Worker Protection Standard (WPS)
Application Exclusion Zone (AEZ) Requirements
Q: What is the "Application Exclusion Zone" or AEZ?
A: The "Application Exclusion Zone" or AEZ is a new terra used in the WPS rule and refers to the
area surrounding the pesticide application equipment that must be free of all persons other than
appropriately trained and equipped handlers during pesticide applications.
Q: How is the AEZ measured and the size of the AEZ determined?
The AEZ is the purple area around the application equipment.
It moves with the application equipment as it proceeds. The
AEZ is generally within the treated area, except when the
application equipment is near the edges of the treated area.
A: The AEZ is measured from the application equipment The AEZ also moves with the application
equipment like a halo around the application equipment
The size of an AEZ varies depending on the type of application and other factors, including droplet
size, and height of nozzles above the planting medium. The AEZ is 100 feet for aerial, air blast,
fumigant, smoke, mist and fog applications, as well as spray applications using very fine or fine
droplet sizes (a volume median droplet diameter (VMD) size of less than 294 microns). An AEZ of
25 feet is required when the pesticide is sprayed using droplet sizes of medium or larger and from
more than 12 inches above the plant medium. An application that does not fall into one of these
categories does not require an AEZ.
Q: I am confused as to whether the new WPS requirements related to the AEZ apply to the
agricultural employer or the handler making the application. Please clarify.
Treated area (green)
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 109 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
QECA-MANL-2016-001-B.1

-------
A: There are several different requirements regarding the AEZ in the revised WPS. First, the WPS
provision at 170.405(a)(1) establishes the applicable AEZ distances. This is a generic description of
the AEZ and is independent of the location (on or off the establishment).
Second, the WPS provision at 170.405(a)(2) establishes a requirement for the agricultural
employer to not allow any workers or other persons in the AEZ within the boundaries of the
establishment until the application is complete. Compliance is required with this requirement
beginning January 2, 2017.
Third, the provision at 170.505(b) establishes a requirement for the handler to suspend the
application if any workers or other persons are anywhere in the AEZ. This requirement is NOT
limited to the boundaries of the establishment This applies to any area on or off the establishment
within the AEZ while the application is ongoing. Please note that this is one of the WPS provisions
that is delayed in implementation until January 2, 2018, to allow time for the handlers to receive
training on the new requirement
The requirement for the agricultural employer to keep persons out of the AEZ only applies within
the boundaries of the establishment because the agricultural employer cannot be expected to
control persons off the establishment. The "suspend application" provision does apply beyond the
boundaries of the establishment because the handler (applicator) and handler employer DO have
control over the pesticide application and are subject to a WPS requirement to apply the pesticide
in a way that will not contact workers or other persons on or off the establishment
Q: What are the agricultural employer's responsibilities related to the pesticide applications
and the new AEZ requirements, and when does this requirement go into effect?
A: The agricultural employer has two responsibilities related to the pesticide applications and the
new AEZ requirements:
•	During any WPS-covered pesticide application, the agricultural employer must keep
workers and all other persons (other than appropriately trained and equipped handlers
involved in the application) out of the treated area and the AEZ within the boundary of the
agricultural establishment This includes people occupying migrant labor camps or other
housing or buildings that are located on the agricultural establishment
•	The agricultural employer may not allow a pesticide to be applied while any worker or
other person on the establishment is in the treated area or within the AEZ.
(Note that if the agricultural employer is also the handler making the pesticide application, he or
she must suspend a pesticide application if any worker or other person is within the AEZ beyond
the boundary of the agricultural establishment.) The requirements related to the AEZ will go into
effect January 2, 2017.
Q: Does the agricultural employer have WPS responsibilities related to the new AEZ
requirements if workers or other persons are off his/her establishment?
A: The AEZ requirement at §170.405(a) imposes no responsibilities on an agricultural employer in
regard to workers or other persons who are not on the agricultural establishment as long as the
agricultural employer is not the pesticide applicator. If the agricultural employer is also the handler
making the pesticide application, then §170.505 would require him/her to suspend a pesticide
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 110 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
application if any worker or other person is within the AEZ beyond the boundary of the agricultural
establishment.
Q: What are the applicator's/pesticide handler's responsibilities related to the pesticide
applications and the new AEZ requirements, and when does this requirement go into effect?
A: Starting January 2, 2018, the handler performing the application must immediately suspend the
pesticide application if any worker or other person, other than an appropriately trained and
equipped handler involved in the application, is in the AEZ, regardless of whether such persons are
on or off the establishment
Q: Why is the implementation date for the handler's requirement to suspend a pesticide
application if workers or other persons are in the AEZ delayed until January 2, 2018?
A: The implementation date for this requirement is delayed until January 2, 2018, to allow time for
pesticide handlers to receive training on the new requirement.
Q: As noted above, the pesticide handler performing the application must immediately
suspend the pesticide application if any worker or other person, other than an appropriately
trained and equipped handler involved in the application, is in the AEZ, regardless of
whether such persons are on or off the establishment. When and under what circumstances
can a handler resume a pesticide application?
A: If the AEZ stretches beyond the property of the agricultural establishment being treated, and a
worker or other person is in this portion of the AEZ, the applicator must temporarily suspend the
application, and may not proceed until the applicator can ensure that the pesticide will not contact
any persons that are in the AEZ area that extends beyond the boundary of the establishment. This is
explained in more detail in EPA's Interpretive Policy below.
The agricultural employer may not allow a pesticide to be applied, or a suspended application to be
resumed, while any worker or other person on the establishment is in the treated area or within the
AEZ. Note that both the handler employer and the handler are required to ensure that no workers
or other persons, other than appropriately trained and equipped handlers involved in the
application, are ever contacted by a pesticide, either directly or through drift, regardless of whether
such persons are on or off the establishment or beyond the boundary of the AEZ.
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 111 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
Interpretive Policy on when a handler may resume a suspended
application when a person is in the AEZ
Q: The final WPS rule contains a provision at 170.505(b) that says: After January 2, 2018, the
handler performing the application must immediately suspend a pesticide application if any worker
or other person, other than an appropriately trained and equipped handler involved in the
application, is in the application exclusion zone (AEZ) described in § 170.405(a)(1) or the area
specified in column B of the Table in § 170.405(b)(4). We understand this requirement for the
handler to suspend the application if workers or other persons are in the AEZ applies even when
the workers or other persons are not on the agricultural establishment. However, the rule does not
state when the handler may resume a pesticide application if the application was suspended
because workers or other persons were in the AEZ but off the establishment property. In this
situation, the employer does not have WPS responsibility to keep those other persons out of the
AEZ, but also does not have control over those other persons and cannot make them move. Please
clarify when the handler may resume the application.
A: If workers or other persons are within the AEZ, the handler must suspend the application
whether the workers and other persons are located on or off the agricultural establishment Before
resuming the application when workers and other persons are in the AEZ but located off the
establishment, the handler must take measures to ensure that such workers and other persons will
not be contacted by the pesticide application either directly or through drift Examples of such
measures include assessing the wind and other weather conditions to confirm they will prevent
workers or other persons from being contacted by the pesticide either directly or through drift;
adjusting the application method or employing drift reduction measures in such a way to ensure
that resuming the application will not result in workers or other persons off the establishment
being contacted by the pesticide; asking the workers or other persons to move out of the AEZ until
the application is complete; or adjusting the treated area or the path of the application equipment
away from the workers or other persons so they would not be in the AEZ. The handler may resume
the pesticide application when a worker or other person is in the AEZ only if the handler can ensure
that it can be carried out in compliance with all of the pesticide's applicable labeling requirements
and restrictions, and that workers and other persons on and off the establishment will not be
contacted by the pesticide as a result of the application except as may be permitted by the
pesticide's labeling. It is important to note that this answer only applies in regard to workers and
other persons beyond the boundaries of the establishment; if a handler were to resume an
application while workers or other persons on the establishment are still within the AEZ, that
would give rise to a violation of § 170.405.
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 112 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
APPENDIX F: ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
1.	Title VI of Civil Rights Act of 1964 at: https://www.epa.gov/civilrights/t6facts.htm
2.	EPA's Title VI - Policies, Guidance, Settlements, Laws and Regulations:
https://www.epa.gov/ocr/epas-title-vi-policies-guidance-settlements-laws-and-
regulations
3.	Limited English Proficiency federal home page at: https://www.lep.gov/
4.	Pesticides Educational Resources Collaborative: http://www.pesticideresources.org/
EPA
Effective Date: 8/15/2018
Page 113 of 113
Worker Protection Standard Inspection Manual
OECA-MANL-2016-001-R1

-------