United States
Environmental Protection
1=1 m m Agency
Provisional Peer-Reviewed Toxicity Values for
Stable (Nonradioactive) Samarium Chloride
(CASRN 10361-82-7)
and
Stable (Nonradioactive) Samarium Nitrate
(CASRN 10361-83-8)
Superfund Health Risk Technical Support Center
National Center for Environmental Assessment
Office of Research and Development
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Cincinnati, OH 45268
EPA/690/R-09/051F
Final
9-17-2009

-------
COMMONLY USED ABBREVIATIONS
BMD
Benchmark Dose
IRIS
Integrated Risk Information System
IUR
inhalation unit risk
LOAEL
lowest-observed-adverse-effect level
LOAELadj
LOAEL adjusted to continuous exposure duration
LOAELhec
LOAEL adjusted for dosimetric differences across species to a human
NOAEL
no-ob served-adverse-effect level
NOAELadj
NOAEL adjusted to continuous exposure duration
NOAELrec
NOAEL adjusted for dosimetric differences across species to a human
NOEL
no-ob served-effect level
OSF
oral slope factor
p-IUR
provisional inhalation unit risk
p-OSF
provisional oral slope factor
p-RfC
provisional inhalation reference concentration
p-RfD
provisional oral reference dose
RfC
inhalation reference concentration
RfD
oral reference dose
UF
uncertainty factor
UFa
animal to human uncertainty factor
UFC
composite uncertainty factor
UFd
incomplete to complete database uncertainty factor
UFh
interhuman uncertainty factor
UFl
LOAEL to NOAEL uncertainty factor
UFS
subchronic to chronic uncertainty factor
1

-------
FINAL
9-17-2009
PROVISIONAL PEER-REVIEWED TOXICITY VALUES FOR
STABLE (NONRADIOACTIVE) SAMARIUM CHLORIDE (CASRN 10361-82-7) AND
STABLE (NONRADIOACTIVE) SAMARIUM NITRATE (CASRN 10361-83-8)
Background
On December 5, 2003, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (U.S. EPA) Office of
Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation (OSRTI) revised its hierarchy of human
health toxicity values for Superfund risk assessments, establishing the following three tiers as the
new hierarchy:
1)	U.S. EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS).
2)	Provisional Peer-Reviewed Toxicity Values (PPRTVs) used in U.S. EPA's Superfund
Program.
3)	Other (peer-reviewed) toxicity values, including
~	Minimal Risk Levels produced by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
Registry (ATSDR),
~	California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) values, and
~	EPA Health Effects Assessment Summary Table (HEAST) values.
A PPRTV is defined as a toxicity value derived for use in the Superfund Program when
such a value is not available in U.S. EPA's IRIS. PPRTVs are developed according to a
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) and are derived after a review of the relevant scientific
literature using the same methods, sources of data, and Agency guidance for value derivation
generally used by the U.S. EPA IRIS Program. All provisional toxicity values receive internal
review by two U.S. EPA scientists and external peer review by three independently selected
scientific experts. PPRTVs differ from IRIS values in that PPRTVs do not receive the
multiprogram consensus review provided for IRIS values. This is because IRIS values are
generally intended to be used in all U.S. EPA programs, while PPRTVs are developed
specifically for the Superfund Program.
Because new information becomes available and scientific methods improve over time,
PPRTVs are reviewed on a 5-year basis and updated into the active database. Once an IRIS
value for a specific chemical becomes available for Agency review, the analogous PPRTV for
that same chemical is retired. It should also be noted that some PPRTV documents conclude that
a PPRTV cannot be derived based on inadequate data.
Disclaimers
Users of this document should first check to see if any IRIS values exist for the chemical
of concern before proceeding to use a PPRTV. If no IRIS value is available, staff in the regional
Superfund and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program offices are advised to
carefully review the information provided in this document to ensure that the PPRTVs used are
appropriate for the types of exposures and circumstances at the Superfund site or RCRA facility
in question. PPRTVs are periodically updated; therefore, users should ensure that the values
contained in the PPRTV are current at the time of use.
1

-------
FINAL
9-17-2009
It is important to remember that a provisional value alone tells very little about the
adverse effects of a chemical or the quality of evidence on which the value is based. Therefore,
users are strongly encouraged to read the entire PPRTV document and understand the strengths
and limitations of the derived provisional values. PPRTVs are developed by the U.S. EPA
Office of Research and Development's National Center for Environmental Assessment,
Superfund Health Risk Technical Support Center for OSRTI. Other U.S. EPA programs or
external parties who may choose of their own initiative to use these PPRTVs are advised that
Superfund resources will not generally be used to respond to challenges of PPRTVs used in a
context outside of the Superfund Program.
Questions Regarding PPRTVs
Questions regarding the contents of the PPRTVs and their appropriate use (e.g., on
chemicals not covered, or whether chemicals have pending IRIS toxicity values) may be directed
to the U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development's National Center for Environmental
Assessment, Superfund Health Risk Technical Support Center (513-569-7300), or OSRTI.
INTRODUCTION
Samarium (Sm; CASRN 7440-19-9) is a rare earth element belonging to the lanthanide1
series of the periodic table. Samarium compounds are used in carbon-arc lamps for movie
projection, permanent magnets, organic reagents, lasers, and alloys. Samarium can form
water-soluble compounds (e.g., samarium chloride and samarium nitrate) and insoluble
compounds (e.g., samarium oxide and samarium hydroxide). Water-soluble samarium
compounds (e.g., samarium chloride) can form insoluble hydroxides at neutral or alkaline pH. In
general, the lanthanides can be radioactive or stable. This PPRTV document addresses only the
toxicity of stable forms of samarium and its compounds, and derives toxicity values only for
samarium chloride and samarium nitrate. Samarium chloride and samarium nitrate are typically
found as the hexahydrates (CASRN 13465-55-9 and 13759-83-6, respectively).
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Integrated Risk Information System
(U.S. EPA, 2009) does not list an oral reference dose (RfD), inhalation reference concentration
(RfC), or cancer assessment for stable, nonradioactive samarium or samarium compounds.
Subchronic or chronic RfDs or RfCs for samarium are not listed in the Health Effects
Assessment Summary Tables (HEAST) (U.S. EPA, 1997) or the Drinking Water Standards and
Health Advisories list (U.S. EPA, 2006). No relevant documents are included in the Chemical
Assessment and Related Activities (CARA) list (U.S. EPA, 1991, 1994).
The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR, 2009), the
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC, 2009), the National Toxicology Program
(NTP, 2005, 2009) and the World Health Organization (WHO, 2009) have not reviewed the
toxicity or carcinogenicity of samarium. The American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists (ACGIH, 2008), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
'The term "lanthanides" refers to 15 elements with atomic numbers 57 through 71: lanthanum, cerium,
praseodymium, neodymium, promethium, samarium, europium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium,
erbium, thulium, ytterbium, and lutetium. The term "rare earths" refers to the lanthanide series plus yttrium
(atomic number 39) and scandium (atomic number 21) (Kirk-Othmer, 1995).
2

-------
FINAL
9-17-2009
(NIOSH, 2005), and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA, 2009) have not
established occupational exposure limits for samarium. One toxicological review of the
lanthanides has been located that derived toxicity values for several lanthanides—but not for
samarium or its compounds (TERA, 1999).
Literature searches for studies relevant to the derivation of provisional toxicity values for
samarium (CASRN 7440-19-9) were conducted in June 2007 in MEDLINE, TOXLINE special,
and DART/ETIC (1960s-June 2007); BIOSIS (2000-June 2007); TSCATS/TSCATS2, RTECS,
CCRIS, HSDB, and GENETOX (not date limited); and Current Contents (previous 6 months).
These literature searches were updated in October 2008 and July 2009. The latter search
identified an additional subchronic study (Weilin et al., 2006) as well as studies of rare earth
complexes as potential anticancer treatments (Kostova et al., 2008, 2007, 2005), which have
been incorporated into the document. Reviews of rare earth or lanthanide toxicity (Haley, 1991;
TERA, 1999; Wells and Wells, 2001) also have been consulted for pertinent information.
REVIEW OF PERTINENT LITERATURE
Overview of Rare Earth Chemical Properties
Environmental and occupational exposure to samarium occurs along with exposure to
other lanthanide and rare earth compounds, including some radioactive isotopes. The lanthanide
series of elements, and the rare earths yttrium and scandium, differ little with regard to chemical
properties (Kirk-Othmer, 1995), and they are difficult to physically separate from one another.
Kirk-Othmer (1995) and Wells and Wells (2001) reviewed the physical-chemical properties of
the lanthanides. These reviews indicate that elements in this series are highly reactive, have high
melting points, ignite in air, and are active reducing agents. Many of the properties of these
compounds are associated with a phenomenon known as lanthanide contraction, wherein the
radius of ions in the series decreases with atomic number due to the configuration of the outer
electron shell. This results from an increasing positive charge on the nucleus with increasing
atomic number. Solubility also increases with increasing atomic number. Wells and Wells
(2001), in general, contend that toxicity is inversely related to atomic number and solubility. The
rare earth elements are broadly grouped into "light" (La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, and Gd) and
"heavy" (Y, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, and Lu) classes (Wells and Wells, 2001); samarium
belongs to the light lanthanide group. For any given lanthanide, soluble forms include chlorides,
nitrates and sulfates, while insoluble forms include carbonates, phosphates and hydroxides. The
larger, lighter (smaller atomic number) and less soluble ions have been observed to deposit
primarily in the liver, while the smaller, heavier (larger atomic number) and more soluble ions
are similar in ionic radius to divalent calcium and distribute primarily to bone (Wells and Wells,
2001). Due to an isoelectric point at a pH <7, lanthanides precipitate readily at physiological pH.
Human Studies
Human studies have indicated an association between occupational exposure to rare
earths and the occurrence of pneumoconiosis and progressive pulmonary fibrosis
(Wells and Wells, 2001; Palmer et al., 1987). Because distinguishing individual lanthanides is
analytically challenging, it is has been difficult to discern the effects of the individual
3

-------
FINAL
9-17-2009
lanthanides, both in human cases and animal studies. In addition, the co-occurrence of
radioactive lanthanides2, thorium isotopes3, and silica dust has complicated the interpretation of
toxicity—especially with regard to human exposures (Palmer et al., 1987).
Human toxicity data on samarium were limited to case reports of pneumoconiosis and
progressive pulmonary fibrosis in workers exposed to airborne mixtures of rare earth
compounds, including lanthanum, cerium, neodymium, samarium, praseodymium, terbium,
yttrium, lutetium, and europium, in the air (Sulotto et al., 1986; Kappenberger and
Buhlmann, 1975; Husain et al., 1980; Sabbioni et al., 1982; Vocaturo et al., 1983;
Colombo et al., 1983; Vogt et al., 1986; Waring and Watling, 1990; and Deng et al., 1991). In
these case reports, rare earth pneumoconiosis has been characterized by pulmonary interstitial
infiltrates, peribronchial and perivascular lesions, and, in some cases, impaired pulmonary
function, dyspnea, cyanosis, and pulmonary fibrosis (Palmer et al., 1987; Wells and
Wells, 2001). The workers in these studies were exposed to fumes generated by carbon-arc
lamps used in movie projection, flood-lighting, printing, photo-engraving, lithography, and
electrowelding (Palmer et al., 1987). Such metal fumes generally are very small particles of
metal oxides that would not be representative of rare earth dusts generated by mechanical means.
The case reports generally detailed the pulmonary findings of individuals, so there was no
information on population exposures or health effects. Haley (1991) reviewed the case studies
and concluded that the studies were limited by inadequate documentation of work histories and
worker health. None of the case reports provided any quantitative measures of exposure
(e.g., concentrations of airborne particulates or individual rare earth elements in the areas of
exposure). In addition, the components of rare earth mixtures to which workers were exposed
were not consistent, nor were the medical histories or details of diagnosis and medical follow-up.
Interpretation of the human cases also is confounded by possible exposures to silica dust,
radioactive rare earths4, and a-emitting contaminants, such as thorium5, that were present in the
occupational setting and have been associated with pneumoconiosis (Palmer et al., 1987).
Haley (1991) proposed that the pneumoconiosis or fibrosis could have resulted from either an
inflammatory response to the dust itself, or irradiation of tissues. However, Haley (1991)
indicated that there was little evidence for a significant contribution from radioactive
contaminants. Palmer et al. (1987) concluded that inhalation exposure to high concentrations of
stable rare earths could produce lesions consistent with pneumoconiosis and progressive
pulmonary fibrosis, and that the potential for inducing these lesions was related to chemical type,
physiochemical form, airborne concentration, and exposure duration.
Although there is evidence for an association between human inhalation exposure to rare
earth elements and pneumoconiosis or fibrosis, the relative contribution of samarium (or any
other individual element) to the development of pneumoconiosis has not been established.
2Lanthanide and rare earth isotopes occur as a result of radioactive decay and by nuclear reactions involving neutron
bombardment (Kirk-Othmer, 1995). The primary decay modes for the radioactive isotopes of the rare earths involve
(3 (including electron capture), y, and X-ray emissions. 149Terbium and 151terbium also have a-decay modes with
half-lives ranging from 4 to 18 hours (ICRP, 1983).
3Primary decay mode involves a-emissions.
4Having primarily (3, y, and X-ray decay modes.
5Thorium 229 has an alpha-decay mode with a half-life of 7340 years; Thorium 226 has an alpha-decay mode with a
half-life of 31 minutes (ICRP, 1983).
4

-------
FINAL
9-17-2009
Furthermore, the available human case studies contained no dose-response information that
could be used to develop provisional toxicity values for any of the stable nonradioactive
lanthanides.
Animal Studies
Oral Exposure—Samarium and Compounds
Haley et al. (1961) fed groups of six male and six female rats (strain not reported) 0, 0.01,
0.1, or 1% samarium chloride (99% pure) in food for 12 weeks. Compound intake is estimated
to be 9.1, 91, or 908 mg/kg-day (5.3, 53, or 532 mg Sm/kg-day) in the males, and 10.0, 100, or
1001 mg/kg-day (5.9, 59, or 586 mg Sm/kg-day) in the females. These doses6 have been
calculated using estimated average body weights of 240 g for males and 180 g for females7, and
estimated food consumption rates of 0.0218 kg/day for males and 0.0180 kg/day for females
(U.S. EPA, 1988). Body weight was measured biweekly throughout the samarium chloride
study; hematology, including total erythrocytes, total leucocytes, differential cell count,
hemoglobin, and hematocrit, and histology, including heart, lung, liver, kidney, pancreas, spleen,
adrenal, and small intestine, were assessed at the end of the study. No exposure-related
histopathological or other changes were observed in either gender, yielding a NOAEL of
908 mg/kg-day for samarium chloride (532 mg Sm/kg-day) in males and 1001 mg/kg-day for
samarium chloride (586 mg Sm/kg-day) in females, with no lowest-observed-adverse-effect level
(LOAEL). The tabular data suggests there was a slight decline in leukocyte counts among
treated rats. However, the very wide reported variability and the fact that Haley et al. (1961)
cited Gardner (1947) in concluding the counts were within the reported normal range for rats,
lead to a conclusion that the changes were not significant. Haley et al. (1961) suggested that the
lack of observed effects might have resulted from poor absorption of the chloride following oral
administration.
Weilin et al. (2006) treated groups of eight male and eight female Sprague-Dawley rats
with 0-, 3-, 4.5-, and 6-mg samarium nitrate per liter of drinking water for 5 months. Data for
males and females were not distinguished. Averaging the default water intake factors for male
(0.139 L/kg-day) and female ( 0.152 L/kg-day) from U.S. EPA (1988), compound intakes are
estimated to be 0.438, 0.657, and 0.876 mg (SmNC^Vkg-day. Using atomic weight data for
samarium (150 g/mole), nitrogen (14 g/mole), and oxygen (16 g/mole), these represent ingestion
rates of approximately 0.196, 0.294, and 0.392 mg Sm/kg-day. At sacrifice, Weilin et al. (2006)
measured body weight; liver, kidney, lung and pancreas weights; and superoxide dismutase
(SOD) activities and malondialdehyde (MDA) concentrations in liver and kidney tissues.
Table 1 summarizes the body and organ weight data reported, while Table 2 summarizes the
SOD and MDA data. The high variability of body-weight data makes its interpretation difficult.
However, only the high dose appears to have had any effect on body weight. Relative liver
weights were statistically significantly (p < 0.05) greater among high dose animals, but this
increase of <7% was not biologically meaningful. Kidney weight data exhibited no apparent
dose-response trend and differences between dose groups were statistically insignificant
(p > 0.05). Both lung and pancreas relative weights exhibited dose-related increases among low
6Dose in mg/kg-day = dietary concentration in mg/kg diet x food consumption rate in kg diet/day ^ body weight in
kg, where food consumption rate = 0.026 kg/day for males and 0.020 kg/day for females.
7Body weights for samarium-treated animals were not reported in the study. For the purpose of dose estimation,
body weights were estimated from a companion study of gadolinium chloride reported in the same paper.
Haley et al. (1961) indicated that growth curves for samarium-treated animals were almost identical to those
observed for gadolinium chloride.
5

-------
FINAL
9-17-2009
and mid-dose rats; among high dose rats, these relative organ weights were significantly
(p < 0.05) greater than controls, but less than those reported among mid-dose rats. SOD
activities in liver and kidney tissues exhibited slight dose-related decreases. MDA
concentrations in liver and kidney tissues both exhibited dose-related increases, and increased
liver MDA concentrations were statistically significant (p < 0.05) at all doses. These data
suggest a 5-month LOAEL of 0.438 mg (SmN03)3/kg-day or 0.196 mg Sm/kg-day, with no
NOAEL, for increased relative pancreas and lung weights, and increased MDA concentrations in
liver tissues of male and female SD rats.
Table 1. Body Weight and Organ/Body-Weight Ratios of Sprague-Dawley Rats
Treated with Samarium Nitrate in Drinking Water
Dose3
N
Body (grams)
Liver/Body
Kidney/Body
Lung/Body
Pancreas/Body
0
16
495±158
30 ±2
6.1 ±0.5
3.07 ± 1.41
1.32 ±0.53
0.44
15
494 ±170
32 ±3
5.8 ±0.5
3.91 ±0.55
1.76 ±0.29
0.66
15
485 ±127
31 ± 4
6.1 ±0.5
4.91 ±0.39
1.98 ±0.71
0.88
13
438±144
32 ±2
6.3 ±0.6
4.28 ±0.06
1.65 ±0.04
"Eight males and eight females per dose group; Weilin et al. (2006), Table 1.
Table 2. Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) and Malondialdehyde (MDA) in Liver and Kidney
Tissues of Sprague-Dawley Rats Treated with Samarium Nitrate in Drinking Water"
Doseb
N
Liver SODc
Kidney SOD
Liver MDAd
Kidney MDA
0
16
3390 ±438
1079 ±236
115 ±52
89 ±34
0.44
15
3387 ±611
1043 ± 92
137 ±29
92 ±25
0.66
15
3162 ±367
1042±130
146 ±39
95 ±26
0.88
13
3155 ±568
1022±185
152 ± 24
96 ±23
amg/kg-day, estimated from drinking water concentrations and standard water intake factors (U.S. EPA, 1988).
bEight males and eight females per dose group; Weilin et al. (2006), Tables 2 and 3.
c|imol/ml.
dNmol/g tissue.
Hu et al. (2007) treated ICR stain male mice with samarium nitrate in drinking water at
concentrations of 0, 5, 50, 500, and 2000 mg/L for 3 months. Both the growth and fertilization
rates of the mice presented a dose-related decline. There also was an "obvious" increase in the
frequency of shortened bodies and tails among embryos produced by treated male mice. Further
details, such as number of mice per group and other endpoints were not provided in the abstract
source for these data.
Chen et al. (2005) treated male mice with samarium nitrate in drinking water containing
0, 4, 20, 100, and 500mg/L for 3 months. The weight of body and main organs, and the enzyme
activity of LDH, ACP, ALP, and ATP in testis were determined. Gross testicular effects were
reported in the 20mg/L- and lOOmg/L-dose groups; LDH enzyme activity was inhibited in
6

-------
FINAL
9-17-2009
lOOmg/L- and 500mg/L-dose groups; and LDH enzyme activity exhibited a dose-response
relationship; but the ACP enzyme activity was not influenced. Three kinds of ATP enzyme
activity all were "promoted weakly and inhibited strongly" with increase of samarium
concentration. Further details, such as number of mice per group, were not provided in the
abstract source for these data.
Oral Exposure—Rare Earth Mixtures
Due to their limited gastrointestinal absorption, Hutcheson et al. (1975) hypothesized that
heavy metal oxides could be used as markers to measure nutrient intake and utilization in studies
with animals or humans. To determine whether these chemicals could be used safely for this
purpose, Hutcheson et al. (1975) investigated the toxicity of a mixture of lanthanides, including
oxides of lanthanum, samarium, europium, terbium, dysprosium, thulium, and ytterbium, and
other metals, including scandium oxide, chromium oxide, and barium sulfate, in a 3-generation
dietary study with CF-1 mice. Groups of 16 female and 8 male weanlings of each generation
were continuously fed diets containing these metals at 0, 1, 10, 100, or 1000 times (X) the
amounts proposed for use as markers of dietary intake and utilization. The proposed dietary
marker amount (X) for each chemical was one-fifth of the concentration necessary for estimation
o
by neutron-activation analysis with an error of 5%. Table 3 shows the concentrations measured
in basal (control) diets and test diets. The 1000X diet was not analyzed for metal content;
Hutcheson et al. (1975) reported the metal concentrations in the 1000X diets as 10 times that of
the measured concentrations in the 100X diet.
Table 3. Measured Concentrations of Rare Earth
Elements in Control and Test Diets"
Elementb
Concentration of Element in Diets (mg/kg diet)
Control
1XC
10X
100X
1000Xd
Europium (Eu)
0.04 ± 0.02e
0.08 ±0.02
0.32 ±0.02
2.10 ±0.02
21.0
Samarium (Sm)
0.33 ±0.02
1.64 ±0.13
11.11 ± 1.71
108.00 ± 2.00
1080.0
Lanthanum (La)
0.69 ±0.02
1.16 ±0.22
6.08 ± 1.02
62.50 ± 1.20
625.0
Dysprosium (Dy)
0.25 ±0.02
1.44 ±0.07
11.38 ±0.74
102.50 ±2.50
1025.0
Ytterbium (Yb)
0.05 ±0.02
0.19 ±0.02
1.12 ±0.08
12.00 ±0.30
120.0
Scandium (Sc)
0.12 ±0.01
0.22 ±0.01
1.58 ±0.08
13.30 ±0.50
133.0
Terbium (Tb)
0.02 ±0.01
0.80 ±0.06
11.02 ± 1.95
79.95 ±4.25
799.5
aHutcheson et al. (1975).
bConcentrations of Tm, Cr, and Ba were not measured in control or test diets.
°1X refers to 1 times the amounts proposed for use as nutritional markers (nominal IX concentrations:
Eu = 0.036 ppm; Sm= 0.80 ppm; La = 0.40 ppm; Dy = 1.20 ppm; Yb = 0.12 ppm; Sc = 0.12 ppm;
Tb = 1.20 ppm; Tm = 0.08 ppm; Cr = 0.02 ppm; and Ba = 0.008 ppm).
Concentrations of elements in the 1000X were not measured. Study authors estimated concentrations as 10 times
higher than those in the 100X diet.
"Means ± SE of 5 samples.
8Neutron bombardment creates traceable radioactive forms of the various compounds after the experiment is
terminated.
7

-------
FINAL
9-17-2009
Hutcheson et al. (1975) reported neither dose nor food intake during the study.
Therefore, daily doses of samarium and other rare earths have been calculated for this review
using the average body weight of mice prior to mating, reported by Hutcheson et al. (1975) as
0.029 kg, and food consumption estimates, based on a U.S. EPA (1988) allometric equation
relating food consumption (kg food/day) to body weight (kg) for laboratory mammals. Table 4
presents the estimated doses. Study endpoints included mortality, clinical signs, body weight (all
adults prior to mating and dams at weaning), morphological development, reproductive outcome
(number of females having litters and average litter size), neonatal growth during lactation (pup
weaning weight), and pup growth after lactation (pup body-weight gain from 3 to 6 weeks of
age). At 3 months of age in each generation, Hutcheson et al. (1975) collected blood from
5 mice/group in the control and 100X groups and analyzed it for hematology, including red and
white blood cell counts, red blood cell size, hemoglobin concentration and hematocrit, and serum
proteins and globulins. Gross pathological examinations were performed on five mice per group
of third generation adult mice receiving control and 100X diets, but no histopathological
examinations were performed on any animals in the study (Hutcheson et al., 1975).
Table 4. Estimated Doses for Mice Fed Rare Earth Elements in the Diet3
Element0
Dose (mg/kg-day)b
Control
IX
10X
100X
1000X
Europium (Eu)
0.007
0.014
0.058
0.380
3.8
Samarium (Sm)
0.06
0.29
2.0
19.6
195.5
Lanthanum (La)
0.125
0.210
1.101
11.32
113.1
Dysprosium (Dy)
0.045
0.261
2.060
18.56
185.6
Ytterbium (Yb)
0.009
0.034
0.203
2.17
21.7
Scandium (Sc)
0.022
0.040
0.286
2.41
24.1
Terbium (Tb)
0.004
0.145
1.995
14.47
144.7
Total Lanthanides
0.27
0.99
7.7
69
690
aHutcheson et al. (1975).
bDose (mg/kg-day) = Concentration in food (mg/kg food) x 0.00525 kg food/day ^ 0.029 kg bw.
Concentrations in food are from Table 1.
Hutcheson et al. (1975) reported the overall incidence of morbidity and mortality as
<0.5%; data on mortality or clinical signs of toxicity were not reported for individual test groups
or generations of mice. Differences in body weights of treated mice from matched controls were
not statistically significant for all generations prior to mating and dams prior to weaning.
Compared to matched controls, no treatment-related effects on pup body weight at the end of
weaning were observed in any generations. Table 5 summarizes pup body-weight gains during
Weeks 3 to 6 for each generation. In the first generation, body-weight gains were significantly
decreased in the IX, 10X, and 100X groups compared to controls, but they were similar to
controls in the 1000X group. In the second generation, body-weight gains were significantly
increased in the IX group and significantly decreased in the 100X and 1000X groups compared
to controls, but similar to controls in the 10X group. In the third generation, body-weight gains
were significantly decreased compared to controls in the 100X group and were similar to
8

-------
FINAL
9-17-2009
controls in the IX, 10X, and 1000X groups. Hutcheson et al. (1975) concluded that the observed
body-weight gain patterns were not consistently associated with dietary concentrations of the
mixture, and a correlation analysis performed for this report confirmed this conclusion.
Table 5. Average Daily Weight Gain in CF-1 Mouse Pups Fed a Rare Earth Mixture in
Diet from 3 Weeks to 6 Weeks of Agea
Generation
Weight Gain (g)
Control
IX
10X
100X
1000X
First
0.200 ± 0.009b
0.106 ±0.010c
0.108 ±0.012c
0.134 ±0.013c
0.230 ±0.014
Second
0.296 ±0.013
0.360 ±0.010c
0.328 ±0.017
0.207 ± 0.007°
0.211 ±0.009c
Third
0.258 ±0.012
0.286 ±0.017
0.250 ±0.011
0.133 ±0.006c
0.280 ±0.012
aHutcheson et al. (1975).
bMean±SE.
°Significantly different matched control (p < 0.01).
Dependence of mean weight gain on dosage was tested using Pearson and Spearman (rank) correlation coefficients
as the test statistics. Weight gain was not significantly dependent on dose. Pearson: F, /? = 0.16: F2 p = 0.25;
F3p = 0.68; Spearman: Fip = 0.42; F2p = 0.23; F3p = 0.69.
Hutcheson et al. (1975) observed no effects on hematology or clinical chemistry
parameters in the 100X group, but did not examine other treated groups for these endpoints. No
effects on reproductive parameters or morphological development were observed. Necropsy
performed on third generation control and 100X mice revealed no abnormal findings.
Hutcheson et al. (1975) observed no effects on body-weight gain or survival in the 1000X group;
however, clinical chemistry, hematology, and necropsies were not conducted for this treatment
group. As such, the highest dose group cannot be designated as a NOAEL. The 100X treatment
(69 mg/kg-day of the rare earth mixture) might be considered a freestanding NOAEL based on
the parameters assessed. Reproductive effects observed in studies of some rare earths, including
decreased pregnancy success, decreased litter size, and decreased neonatal weight (Wells and
Wells, 2001) were not observed in this study. However, Hutcheson et al. (1975) did not evaluate
blood coagulation, which is known to be affected by exposure to rare earths (Wells and
Wells, 2001). The usefulness of this study for assessing samarium toxicity is limited by the
coexposure to other rare earths. There is no information to assess how the various elements react
together in a complex mixture or how the presence of other rare earths (as well as barium sulfate
and chromium oxide) affects samarium pharmacokinetics or toxicity.
Inhalation Exposure—Samarium and Compounds
There were no inhalation studies of samarium or its compounds alone (without other rare
earth compounds).
Inhalation Exposure—Rare Earth Mixtures
Studies investigating the effects of respiratory exposure to rare earth mixtures included a
14-day intratracheal study and a 3-year inhalation study in guinea pigs exposed whole body to
mixtures containing several (insoluble) rare earth compounds, including fluorides and oxides of
cerium, praseodymium, neodymium, samarium, europium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium,
holmium, erbium, germanium, thulium, ytterbium, and lutetium (Schepers, 1955a,b;
9

-------
FINAL
9-17-2009
Schepers et al., 1955). In the study involving intratracheal instillation, a blend (termed the
high-oxide blend) of carbon (31%), rare earth fluorides (39.6%), rare earth oxides (26.4%), and
potassium sulfate (3%) was ground, suspended in isotonic saline and anodized. A 50-mg dose of
the high oxide blend was administered twice (7 days between doses) to a group of 9 guinea pigs.
A second blend (termed the high-fluoride blend) containing carbon (17.0 %) graphite (3.0%),
rare earth fluorides (65.0%), rare earth oxides (10.0%), and potassium sulfate (5.0%) was
prepared in a manner similar to the high oxide blend, and administered on the same schedule to a
second group of 9 guinea pigs. The high fluoride blend was also administered as an aerosol via
inhalation to a group of 75 guinea pigs 8 hours/day, 5Vi days/week (44 hours/week), for 3 years.
Schepers (1955a,b) and Schepers et al. (1955) did not report the concentrations of samarium or
other rare earth constituents in the exposure mixtures, nor did they report the concentration of the
mixture in the aerosol exposure chamber. Rather, they reported only that particle concentrations
were "high" in the early weeks but "leveled off' to about 200,000 to 300,000 particles
(1-2 micron diameter) per cubic foot of air.
Following intratracheal instillation, mortality was observed in three guinea pigs receiving
the high-oxide blend (10-11 days postexposure) and in four guinea pigs receiving the
high-fluoride blend (12-29 days postexposure). Schepers et al. (1955) considered the deaths to
be treatment-related. Macroscopic evaluation of the lungs revealed changes consistent with
deposition of inert material (congestion and consolidation with large single or multiple
black-pigmented conglomerate lesions). Histologic evaluation (Schepers, 1955b) of survivors
exposed to the high-oxide dust for up to a year revealed focal aggregation of the dust (cellular
eosinophilia) but no chronic cellular reaction or fibrosis. Schepers (1955b) noted similar dust
deposits in the animals exposed to the high-fluoride blend but these animals developed transient
chemical pneumonitis, subacute bronchitis, and bronchiolitis. As with the other blend, Schepers
(1955a) observed no fibrosis or granulomatosis.
Following long-term inhalation exposure to the high-fluoride blend of rare earths, the
histopathological changes observed in guinea pigs included focal hypertrophic emphysema,
regional bronchiolar structuring, and subacute chemical bronchitis. Schepers (1955a) noted that,
as with the intratracheal instillation studies, pigment was deposited and retained in foci. In
contrast to human occupational exposure cases, no fibrosis or granulomatosis was observed.
The results of this study do not corroborate conclusions drawn by Palmer (1987) that
chronic occupational exposure to stable rare earth dusts results in progressive pulmonary fibrosis
in humans. However, the exposures in the animal and human studies were not strictly
comparable due to differences in exposure components, including the presence of silica dust,
radioactive rare earths, and thorium in the human exposures. Further, as noted by Palmer (1987),
other factors that may explain the differences in human and animal findings include chemical
type, physiochemical forms, doses, and durations of exposure. In any case, the relevance of
studies by Schepers (1955a,b; Schepers et al., 1955) to samarium toxicity is uncertain due to the
lack of information on specific exposure concentrations and the samarium content of the
mixtures.
10

-------
FINAL
9-17-2009
Other Studies
Acute Exposure
Acute Lethality Studies—Acute oral lethality studies have been conducted for samarium
nitrate and samarium chloride (see Table 6). Bruce et al. (1963) reported an oral LD50 of
901 mg Sm/kg following gavage administration of samarium nitrate (50% aqueous solution) in
adult female Sprague-Dawley rats observed for 30 days after exposure. Haley et al. (1961) was
not able to determine an acute LD50 for samarium chloride in CF1 mice (age, weight, and gender
not reported) because no mortalities occurred up to 7 days after oral exposure (method of
administration not reported) at the highest dose tested (1172 mg Sm/kg); higher doses were not
be evaluated due to solubility limits.
Table 6 summarizes data from the intraperitoneal acute lethality studies that have been
conducted for samarium chloride, nitrate, citrate, and edetate compounds. For samarium
chloride, LD50s ranged from 214 mg Sm/kg in CFW albino mice (gender not reported)
(Graca et al., 1962) to 343 mg Sm/kg in male CF1 mice (Haley et al., 1961). Haley et al. (1961)
observed clinical signs of toxicity in mice following intraperitoneal (i.p.) treatment with
samarium chloride, including decreased respiration, lethargy, muscle spasms, abdominal cramps,
and diarrhea; dose-response data were not reported. In mice administered samarium chloride,
i.p., precipitate was observed at the injection site, indicating that absorption was incomplete
(Graca et al., 1962). For samarium nitrate, Bruce et al. (1963) reported similar intraperitoneal
LD50s in female Sprague-Dawley rats (96 mg Sm/kg) and female CF1 mice (106 mg Sm/kg).
Table 6. Acute Lethality of Stable Samarium Compounds
Following Oral and Parenteral Exposure
Compound
Species/Strain
(Gender)
Route of Exposure
LDS0
(mg/kg body weight)3
Reference
Samarium
chloride
Mice/CFl
(NR)
oral
(not specified)
For SmCl3: >2000
For Sm: >1172
Haley et al.
(1961)
Mice/CFW albino
(NR)
i.p.
For SmCl3: 365b
For Sm: 214
Graca et al.
(1962)
Mice/CFl
(male)
i.p.
For SmCl3: 585 (508.7-672.7)
For Sm: 343
Haley et al.
(1961)
Samarium nitrate
Rats/Sprague-Dawley
(female)
oral
(gavage, 50% aqueous
solution)
For Sm(N03)3: 2900 (2660-3161)
For Sm 901 (890-1069)
Bruce et al.
(1963)
Mice/CFl
(female)
i.p.
For Sm(N03)3: 315 (258-384)
For Sm: 106 (87-130)
Bruce et al.
(1963)
Rats/Sprague-Dawley
(female)
i.p.
For Sm(N03)3: 285 (254-319)
For Sm: 96 (86-108)
Bruce et al.
(1963)
Rats/Sprague-Dawley
(female)
i.v.
For Sm(N03)3: 35.8 (27.3-49.9)
For Sm: 13.0 (9.9-18.1)
Bruce et al.
(1963)
Rats/Sprague-Dawley
(male)
i.v.
For Sm(N03)3: 59.1 (40.5-86.3)
For Sm: 20.0(13.7-29.2)
Bruce et al.
(1963)
"(): 95% confidence limits, as reported by study authors
bPrecipitate observed at injection site.
NR = not reported; i.p. = intraperitoneal injection; i.v.: intravenous injection
11

-------
FINAL
9-17-2009
Graca et al. (1962) tested the acute lethality of samarium in citrate and edetate
complexes. The test materials were described as "chloride-citrate" and edetate complexes or
chelates; however, the exact nature and molecular formula or weight were not given. The
chelating agents were added to enhance the solubility of the chloride and prevent injection-site
precipitation. Graca et al. (1962) reported i.p. LD50s in equivalent units of mg SmCh/kg, rather
than in terms of the compound tested or in equivalent dose of the rare earth alone; it is not clear
from the study if this was a reporting error, if the units were converted to S1T1CI3 equivalents, or
if all the test materials were complexes of samarium chloride. As a consequence of this
uncertainty, the LD50s reported by Graca et al. (1962) are not considered to be reliable indicators
of the acute toxicity of the citrate and edetate compounds. As reported by Graca et al. (1962),
i.p. LD50s for samarium citrate complexes were 164.25 mg SmCh/kg in CFW albino mice (age
and gender not reported) and 74.8 mg SmCl3/kg in guinea pigs (age, strain, and gender not
reported); for samarium edetate complexes, LD50s were 311.18 mg SmCl.Vkg in CFW albino
mice and 177.95 mg SmCl3/kg in guinea pigs Graca et al. (1962). These LD50s should be
interpreted cautiously, given the uncertainties outlined above.
Bruce et al. (1963) reported intravenous LD50s of 20 and 13 mg Sm/kg for samarium
nitrate in male and female Sprague-Dawley rats, respectively. Bruce et al. (1963) also tested the
hypothesis that the nitrate ion might be the source of toxicity and found it was not: no effects
were observed among 10 female rats within 30 days of i.p. injection of 181 mg/kg sodium
nitrate. Wells and Wells (2001) questioned the validity of intravenous acute lethality data for
rare earth compounds because mortality after exposure to intravenously-administered rare earths
has exhibited a bell-shaped dose-response curve that may be due to the formation of rare earth
colloids in the blood at high doses of the chloride or nitrate compounds.
The acute lethality data are of limited utility for comparing the relative toxicity of
different samarium compounds. As noted earlier, the available LD50s for edetate and citrate
forms of samarium (Graca et al., 1962) cannot be considered reliable due to uncertainty in the
reported doses. The intravenous lethality data also are questionable due to presumed formation
of colloids in the blood after intravenous administration of high doses of the chlorides and
nitrates. Acute i.p. lethality data for samarium chloride in mice, and samarium nitrate in mice
and rats suggest that the acute i.p. toxicity of these samarium compounds is of comparable order
of magnitude; LD50s ranged between 106 and 343 mg Sm/kg. It should be noted that the one
mouse i.p. LD50 for samarium nitrate is for female mice (Bruce et al., 1963), while the LD50s for
samarium chloride are for male mice (Haley et al., 1961) or for mice of unspecified gender
(Graca et al., 1962). Because gender differences in the acute lethality of some rare earth
compounds has been noted (Bruce et al., 1963; Wells and Wells, 2001), comparisons between
these LD50s is of limited utility for evaluating relative toxicity of the different compounds. In
addition, since precipitate was observed at the injection site in one of the mouse acute lethality
studies of samarium chloride (Graca et al., 1962), the absorption of samarium chloride may have
been affected by the formation of insoluble hydroxides or protein complexes at the injection site.
The oral acute toxicity data for samarium chloride and samarium nitrate are not
comparable, primarily because the studies were conducted in different species, and species
differences in absorption or toxicity could not be ruled out without additional data collection.
Wells and Wells (2001) reported that the nonmetallic components of rare earth compounds may
strongly influence a compound's acute toxicity. Greater oral toxicity of the samarium nitrate
might be inferred from the properties of the nitrate anion, if hydrolysis of the nitrate anion in the
12

-------
FINAL
9-17-2009
stomach leads to the formation of reactive nitrogen compounds such as nitric oxides, nitrous
suboxides, and nitric acid in the gastrointestinal tract. However, the behavior of samarium
nitrate in the gut has not been studied, and available data do not support potential conclusions
that the nitrate anion causes the observed differences in relative oral toxicities of the nitrate and
chloride forms of samarium.
Data on the acute oral or parenteral toxicity of insoluble samarium compounds
(e.g., oxides or hydroxides) have not been located. While an assessment of the behavior of these
compounds in the gastrointestinal milieu (e.g., dissociation in the stomach and/or small intestine)
might provide some insight into the oral absorption of these compounds, few conclusions
regarding their relative acute toxicities can be drawn in the absence of corresponding parenteral
toxicity data. As with the nitrate form, the potential for formation of reactive species in the gut
upon dissociation of the oxide or hydroxide forms provides a mechanistic basis for potentially
greater toxicity, but this has not been studied.
Other Acute Studies—Graca et al. (1964) investigated the effects of acute intravenous
exposure to chloride, citrate, and edetate compounds of rare earth elements on heart rate, blood
pressure, respiration, and clinical hematology in male and female dogs (breed, number, and
gender not specified). Aqueous solutions of 15 rare earth elements, equivalent to 5% of the
chloride, of 15 rare earth elements were injected into a cannula inserted into the left femoral
vein. Ten doses of 10 mg/kg each, as the chloride or its equivalent in the chelates, were injected
into anesthetized dogs at 10-minute intervals. For each rare-earth element, groups of three dogs
were treated with the chloride, citrate, or edetate. Three groups of control dogs were injected
with sodium citrate (n = 6), ammonium edetate calcium (versenate) (n = 6) or Ringer's solution
(n = 12) in the same manner as treated animals. Blood samples were collected from the right
femoral vein before treatment and 0, 10, 30, 60, 100, and 160 minutes after treatment for analysis
of erythrocyte, leukocyte, and differential cell counts; prothrombin and coagulation time;
hemoglobin; sedimentation; and hematocrit. After 160 minutes, the animals were necropsied and
tissues were collected for histopathology (liver, spleen, kidney, lung, sternum, mesentery lymph
nodes, heart, adrenal, and ovaries or testes). Heart rate, respiration, and blood pressure were
measured at the same intervals as blood samples.
Graca et al. (1964) generally discussed results for the 15 rare earth elements and
presented them graphically as change over time after treatment. No statistical analysis for any
endpoint was provided in the report and insufficient details are provided to allow such analyses
for this report. Graca et al. (1964) reported that 14/45 dogs injected with chlorides, 4/45 injected
with citrates, and 1/45 injected with edetates died from treatment—but mortality was not
separately reported for each element. Graca et al. (1964) attributed the deaths to circulatory
failure. In general, based on mortality data, the chloride compounds of rare earth elements were
more toxic than the citrate or edetate compounds. During the first hour of treatment, samarium
chloride produced 5-8% decreases in blood pressure, with -12% decreases at the 100-minute
and 18%) decreases at thel60-minute assessments. Graca et al. (1964) observed similar effects
on blood pressure for samarium citrate during the first hour, but blood pressures at 100 and
160 minutes appeared to be similar to controls, based on a graph of outcomes. Samarium edetate
did not affect blood pressure during the first 60 minutes of treatment, but it produced an
approximate 20%> decrease at 100 and 160 minutes. Injection of samarium chloride produced
decreases in heart rate that progressed over time from approximately 10%> at 30 minutes to
approximately 75%> at 160 minutes. Graca et al. (1964) observed minor variations in heart rate
13

-------
FINAL
9-17-2009
among animals injected with samarium citrate and samarium edetate, although changes were
generally <10%. Respiration rates were increased at all time points for all samarium compounds,
with the most pronounced change observed in animals injected with samarium citrate
(approximately 20 to 50%). Prothrombin time was markedly increased from approximately 5 to
10 seconds in controls to approximately 65 to >100 seconds for samarium chloride, 50 to
90 seconds for samarium citrate, and 45 to 75 seconds for samarium edetate. Coagulation times
of approximately 10 minutes in controls increased to approximately 24 to 50 minutes for
samarium chloride and approximately 18 to >100 minutes for samarium citrate.
Graca et al. (1964) observed increased clotting times of -30 minutes for samarium edetate only
at the 160-minute observation point. Effects of samarium compounds on clotting parameters
were generally consistent with the effects observed for other rare earths tested in the study—both
in terms of the timing of effects and the relative toxicity of the three compounds tested. Gross
and histopathological examinations revealed slight-to-moderate hyperemia of the lungs (data not
reported) only in animals treated with chlorides of the rare-earth elements.
Lambert et al. (1990) administered samarium oxide 5.0 g/kg in water by gavage to
10 fasted Sprague-Dawley rats. No deaths or other clinical signs were observed in the
14-day observation period following dosing. Lambert et al. (1990) also observed no dermal
irritation among six New Zealand Albino rabbits following application of 0.5-g samarium oxide
to one intact and one abraded skin site that were occluded for 24 hours and observed for
72 hours. Lambert et al. (1990) observed minimal eye irritation among six New Zealand Albino
rabbits treated with 0.1-g samarium oxide in the eye. Draize et al., 1944 scores were as follows:
•	Three eyes rinsed with saline 30 seconds postinstallation: 5.3 at 24 hours; 3.3 at
48 hours; 0.7 at 72 hours.
•	Three unrinsed eyes: 5.3 at 24 hours; 2.0 at 48 hours; 0 at 72 hours.
In Vitro Studies
Kostova and colleagues (2007, 2005) have demonstrated that certain complexes of
samarium and other rare earth metals exhibit antineoplastic, antiproliferative, and other cytotoxic
activity against tumor cells, in vitro. However, in vivo data were not available to develop
dose-response relationships. In addition, these complexes were specially prepared for
experimental medicinal testing and are unlikely to appear as site contaminants.
Toxicokinetics
Based on the available data for samarium and other light lanthanides, samarium is likely
to be absorbed poorly from the gastrointestinal tract, deposited primarily in the liver and
secondarily to bone, and excreted primarily in the feces. The limited oral acute lethality data
suggest that gastrointestinal absorption of samarium and other rare earths is low. Comparison
between available i.p. and oral LD50s shows that the oral LD50s exceed the corresponding i.p.
LD50s, which probably is due to the limited absorption of the ingested compounds. Wells and
Wells (2001) noted that, in general, oral LD50s for rare earth elements are about 10-fold higher
than corresponding i.p. LD50s, and Bruce et al. (1963) found i.v. administration also to be an
order of magnitude more toxic than oral administration.
Toxicokinetics of Samarium and Compounds—Ulusoy and Whitley (2000) and
Fairweather-Tait et al. (1997) investigated the use of rare earth elements as nonabsorbable fecal
markers in humans. Ulusoy and Whitley (2000) orally administered a solution containing a
14

-------
FINAL
9-17-2009
combination of five rare earth element oxides (samarium [1-mg Sm, 0.665 [jmole], lanthanum
[1-mg La; 7.2 [jmole], terbium [7.5-mg Tb; 47.2 [jmole], ytterbium [5-mg Yb; 28.9 [jmole], and
europium [10-mg Eu; 65.8 [jmoles]) to six healthy subjects (five males and one female);
seven healthy subjects (six males and one female) ingested a solution containing samarium oxide
(1-mg Sm) and 57Fe (2-mg Fe; compound not specified), which was included as a radioactive
tracer to improve the accuracy of intake and excretion measurements. Fecal samples were
collected for 1 week following ingestion of the test material. For subjects administered the
solution containing the mixture of rare earth oxides, 94.3 ± 4.0% (mean ± SD) of the ingested
samarium was recovered in feces. For subjects administered samarium oxide and 57Fe,
103 ± 3.1% (mean ± SD) of the ingested samarium was recovered in feces. These results
indicate that samarium oxide was very poorly absorbed (0—5.7%) following oral exposure.
Similar results regarding the low oral absorption of the more soluble samarium chloride were
reported by Fairweather-Tait et al. (1997), who administered diets containing samarium chloride
(1-mg Sm) plus stable isotopes of iron (as FeS04) to healthy human subjects (3 males and
10 females). Total recovery of samarium in feces collected for 9 days postexposure was 103%
(range of 96—106%), indicating that samarium chloride also was very poorly absorbed following
oral administration. Studies evaluating the toxicokinetics of samarium following oral exposure
in animals were not identified.
In an unpublished study aimed at developing a model for assessing lung deposition of
promethium from analysis of excreta, Shipler et al. (1975) evaluated the toxicokinetics of
inhalation exposure in 36 rats and 5 dogs exposed to a mixture of samarium oxide (145Sm203)
and promethium oxide (143Pm203). Samarium was added to determine its usefulness as a carrier.
Exposures were 30 minutes (nose only) for rats (strain and gender not reported) and 5 to
10 minutes (whole body) for dogs (breed and gender not reported). The concentrations of
samarium and promethium in the aerosol were not reported. The ratio of145Sm to 143Pm in the
suspension used to generate the aerosol was about 3:1, and the total concentration of
radioactivity in the aerosol was 0.0216 j_iCi/L for rats and ranged from 0.771 to 7.20 j_iCi/L for
dogs. The mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) of the aerosol was 3.4 |im for the study
in rats and 2.3 |im for the study in dogs.
Shipler et al. (1975) sacrificed 12 of the 36 rats immediately after exposure for estimation
of the lung burden of each element; remaining rats were sacrificed 14 and 30 days after exposure
(12 rats at each sacrifice). Radioactivity in the lungs of dogs was measured 5 times during the
30-day postexposure period; dogs were sacrificed at the end of the 30-day period.
Shipler et al. (1975) collected urine and feces from all animals throughout the 30-day
postexposure period. Upon sacrifice, the following organs were analyzed for 145Sm and 143Pm:
lungs, blood, liver, kidney, gastrointestinal tract, gonads, hepatic lymph nodes, tracheobronchial
lymph nodes, heads, pelts, skeleton, and muscle. Among rats, data for 145Sm in skeleton, kidney,
and muscle were reported only for the 14-day postexposure assessment. Shipler et al. (1975)
estimated the initial lung burden in rats immediately following exposure to be 1.05 |ig Sm203;
initial lung burden in dogs was estimated to range from 0.106 to 1.65 |ig Sm203.
Shipler et al. (1975) reported that samples containing high concentrations of calcium and
sodium salts might have considerable error in radioactivity counts. The distribution of both
145Sm and 143Pm in rats and dogs were very similar; representative results for 145Sm are reported
here. In rats sacrificed after 14 days, the skeleton, muscle, and kidneys were reported to contain
3.1%), 2.2%), and 0.21% (respectively) of the initial 145Sm lung burden. In rat lungs, 145Sm
15

-------
FINAL
9-17-2009
content was 62% and 40% of the initial lung burden at 14 and 30 days postexposure,
respectively. In rat livers, 145Sm content was 2.9% and 4.0% of the initial lung burden on
Postexposure Days 14 and 30, respectively. 145Samarium was eliminated in feces and urine, with
the highest amounts eliminated during the first two days following exposure. Shipler et al.
(1975) reported fecal excretion during the first 2 days of exposure to be more than 3000% of the
initial lung burden. That the fecal excretion of radioactivity far exceeded the calculated lung
burden suggests that most of the aerosol was initially deposited to the nasopharynx and upper
bronchial regions and cleared to the gastrointestinal tract, while much less was deposited in the
pulmonary region. Urinary excretion during the first 2 days after exposure was 26.4% of the
initial lung burden. Plots of both urinary and fecal excretion of radiation reveal a rapid initial
phase over the first few days after exposure, with a slower second phase 10-30 days
postexposure. Shipler et al. (1975) hypothesized that the results indicated two phases of
clearance, the first associated with clearance of material via the gastrointestinal tract to the feces,
and the second associated with clearance from more distal areas of the lung.
Shipler et al. (1975) sacrificed all dogs 30 days after exposure; the initial lung burden
immediately following exposure was not determined. At the end of the 30-day postexposure
period, 145Sm was measured in several organs, including lungs, liver, kidneys, gastrointestinal
tract, spleen, and skeleton; the content varied by individual dog but indicated the greatest
distributions were to the liver and skeleton. Fecal excretion of 145Sm 2 days after exposure
ranged from 64% to 567% of the estimated initial lung burden, indicating substantial deposition
in, or mechanical clearance to, the gastrointestinal tract. Shipler et al. (1975) reported urinary
excretion data for only 1 dog, estimating that 0.3% of the initial lung burden was eliminated in
the urine on Day 2; other time-points were not reported.
The results of these studies in rats and dogs (Shipler et al., 1975) indicate that aerosolized
Sm203 and 143Pm203 were absorbed following inhalation exposure; however, due to substantial
deposition of the material to the gastrointestinal tract, the relative contributions of pulmonary and
gastrointestinal absorption to the overall absorption following inhalation exposure could not be
determined.
Studies on the distribution and elimination of samarium compounds following parenteral
exposure indicated that the liver, bones, and spleen were primary sites of initial distribution, and
that samarium was eliminated in the urine and feces; however, distribution and elimination
varied with the specific samarium compound (ICRP, 1981; Durbin et al., 1956; Rosoff et al.,
1963). Durbin et al. (1956) investigated the distribution and elimination of oxides and chlorides
of 153Sm in groups of five female Sprague-Dawley rats following intramuscular injection of 0.3
9	153	153
or 0.6 |ig of carrier compound labeled with Sm (30 or 75 |iCi Sm /rat); data were collected
for 4 days. Distribution and elimination of radioisotopes of 14 other lanthanide oxides and
chlorides also were investigated in the same study (Durbin et al., 1956). Approximately 30%
and 50%) of the injected 153Sm was distributed to the bone and liver, respectively, and
approximately 10% was excreted in urine and feces after 4 days (data presented graphically); the
distribution of the remaining 15% of the administered dose was not reported. The initial
distribution of samarium was similar to that observed for other light lanthanide elements
(Durbin et al., 1956). Although long-term skeletal retention of 153Sm was not evaluated in the
9The radioactive oxide was dissolved in 6N HC1, 10 mg of NaQ was added, then the solution was dried. Sodium
citrate was then added and the pH was adjusted to neutral (presumably pH = 7 at 25C) with 9N NaOH.
16

-------
FINAL
9-17-2009
study, skeletal retention curves for other light lanthanide elements (147Pm and 144Ce) showed two
components, a labile component and a fixed component (Durbin et al., 1956). The labile
component represented approximately 33% of the initial skeletal burden, with an elimination
half-life of approximately 15 days; the stable component represented approximately 66% of the
initial skeletal burden and appeared to be "fixed," with no apparent decrease in bone burden up
to 256 days after administration. This corresponded to an elimination half-time exceeding
5 years. Data regarding the long-term effects of stored stable samarium were unavailable.
However, it should be noted that such long-term deposition of radioactive samarium so close to
the bone marrow—and its stem cells for RBCs and all white cell lines—could have serious
health consequences.
Rosoff et al. (1963) evaluated the distribution and elimination of samarium chloride
(SmCl3), samarium nitriloacetate (SmNTA), and samarium edetate (SmEDTA) labeled with
153Sm 24 hours after intravenous injection (0.051 mg Sm) into groups of 5 male CF1 mice. The
cumulative 24-hour urinary excretion of 153Sm was 58.7% of administered dose for SmEDTA;
for SmNTA, and SmCl3, was 12.4% and 3.3% of the administered 153Sm dose, respectively. The
24-hour tissue distribution of 153Sm was similar for SmCl3 and SmNTA (data presented
graphically), with the highest percentages of the administered 153Sm distributed to liver
(approximately 32% for SmCl3 and 22% for SmNTA) and spleen (approximately 28% for SmCl3
and 14%) for SmNTA). Accumulation in bone was approximately 6% of administered 153Sm for
SmNTA and approximately 2% for SmCl3. For SmEDTA, approximately 8% of the
administered 153Sm was distributed to bone, 4% to liver, and 1% to spleen.
Toxicokinetics of Rare Earths—Several reports have concluded that the toxicokinetics
of light lanthanides (lanthanum, cerium, praseodymium, neodymium, promethium, and
samarium) are similar (Haley, 1965; ICRP, 1981; Hirano and Suzuki, 1996; Mode, 1990; Wells
and Wells, 2001); therefore, the toxicokinetic characteristics of other light lanthanide elements
may apply to samarium.
The oral absorption of several lanthanide compounds, including samarium, lanthanum,
terbium, ytterbium, and europium in humans was investigated in studies on their use as
nonabsorbable fecal markers. Ulusoy and Whitley (2000) reported oral absorption of lanthanide
oxides to range from 5.5 ± 4.5% (mean ± SD) for terbium to 6.5 ± 3.9% for ytterbium.
Fairweather-Tait (1997) reported detecting no absorption of samarium chloride, with recovery of
samarium in the feces exceeding 100% of the administered dose. These results indicate that
lanthanide oxides and chlorides probably are poorly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract.
Durbin et al. (1956) estimated that absorption of other lanthanide chloride and oxide
compounds (144Ce, 152'154Eu, 160Tb, and 170Tm10), following oral exposure in rats, was <0.1% of
the administered dose. Absorption of lanthanide elements following oral exposure is likely to
vary with chemical form (e.g., soluble versus insoluble) and may be markedly enhanced by the
presence of oxidizing agents, such as ferric iron, or under fasting conditions
(Sullivan et al., 1986; Hirano and Suzuki, 1996). Samarium chloride (SmCl3) is a relatively
10The primary decay modes for all of these isotopes involve (3 (including electron capture), y, and X-ray emissions.
These isotopes are not a-emitters (ICRP, 1983).
17

-------
FINAL
9-17-2009
strong Lewis acid that forms insoluble hydroxides at neutral or alkaline pH; these reactions may
limit the bioavailability of ingested samarium chloride relative to more water soluble samarium
salts such as samarium nitrate.
As reviewed by Wells and Wells (2001), heavy lanthanides distribute primarily to the
skeleton while the lighter lanthanides distributed primarily to the liver (45% and 65% of the
administered doses for samarium and lanthanum, respectively). The skeleton is a secondary site
of deposition for the light lanthanides. Excretion of the lanthanides occurs through the urine and
feces in proportions that are dependent upon position of each element in the series. Light
lanthanides such as samarium are excreted primarily in the feces; heavy lanthanides are excreted
primarily in the urine, and the mid-series elements are excreted approximately equally.
Based on the available toxicokinetic data from animals and humans,
Taylor and Legett (2003) published a biokinetic model to predict the disposition of lanthanide
elements in humans. The model consists of compartments for soft tissue (including
subcompartments for slow, intermediate, and rapid turnover), skeleton (six sub compartments for
cortical and trabecular volume, surface and marrow), kidneys, urinary bladder, urine, blood, liver
(three subcompartments), gastrointestinal tract, gonads, and feces. Based on the available
information, Taylor and Legett (2003) concluded that elements within the lanthanide series could
be divided into five groups, based on neighboring elements having similar properties, and
derived set-specific parameters for each group on the basis of existing data for rats, humans, and
dogs. In their model, neodymium, promethium, and samarium were treated as a similar group
with common parameters.
Taylor and Legett (2003) compared predictions from their generic model with existing
human data and existing International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) models
for radioactive promethium and gadolinium. Good agreement between the generic model and
the ICRP models for radioactive promethium and gadolinium was observed for whole-body
retention, urinary and fecal excretion, and absorbed doses to the bone surfaces, bone marrow,
and liver. However, the doses predicted for the kidneys and testes were three orders of
magnitude higher than those estimated by existing ICRP models. In summary, Taylor and
Legett (2003) concluded that their model appeared to be adequate for use in general radiological
protection, but should be applied with appropriate caution for interpretation of data from
bioassays.
Genotoxicity
There is limited in vitro evidence that stable nonradioactive rare earth metals have
genotoxic activity (Jha and Singh, 1995; Hui et al., 1998). However, no data specific to
samarium were identified.
DERIVATION OF PROVISIONAL SUBCHRONIC AND CHRONIC
ORAL RfDs FOR SAMARIUM COMPOUNDS
Data on the oral toxicity of subchronic or chronic human exposure to stable samarium
compounds have not been identified. Six animal studies were identified that might have assisted
in development of provisional subchronic RfDs for samarium compounds. However, only two
18

-------
FINAL
9-17-2009
of the studies (Haley et al., 1961; Weilin et al., 2006) provide information that can be considered
for quantitative derivation of p-RfDs. Hutcheson et al. (1975) provides quantitative data—but
only for mixtures of lanthanides. Bruce et al. (1963) provides information on the relative
toxicity of samarium compounds, while two Chinese studies of reproductive factors (Chen et al.,
2005; Hu et al., 2007) were available only as abstracts that provided insufficient information.
Information on the toxicity in experimental animals of repeated oral exposures to
samarium compounds alone (i.e., not as part of a mixture with other lanthanide compounds) was
limited to a 12-week dietary study of samarium chloride in rats (Haley et al., 1961) and a
5-month drinking water study in rats (Weilin et al., 2006). Haley (1961) reported no effects on
the parameters evaluated (body weight, hematology, and histopathology of selected tissues)
following dietary treatment with samarium chloride; thus, the highest doses tested
(908-mg SmCl3/kg-day or 532-mg Sm/kg-day in males; 1001-mg SmCl3/kg-day or
586-mg Sm/kg-day in females) were identified as freestanding NOAELs. In the absence of other
data, this NOAEL provides a point of departure (POD) from which to derive a p-RfD for
samarium chloride. This POD is supported by the observation that, even acutely, samarium
chloride does not seem to be toxic by the oral route and various lines of evidence suggest limited
oral absorption.
The potential for reproductive or developmental effects of oral exposure to stable
samarium was investigated in a 3-generation feeding study on a mixture of lanthanide oxides
(oxides of lanthanum, samarium, europium, terbium, dysprosium, thulium, and ytterbium) and
other metals (scandium oxide, chromium oxide, and barium sulfate) in mice (Hutcheson et al.,
1975). Results showed no effects on reproduction, development, growth, adult body weight, or
other parameters, including hematology, serum proteins, and gross pathology, yielding a
freestanding NOAEL of 69 mg /kg-day for the mixture of lanthanide oxides. Data from this
study are not useful for assessing samarium toxicity, given the coexposure to multiple
lanthanides and the failure to identify a toxic endpoint.
Data cited in this document strongly suggest that different chemical forms of samarium
have different toxic potencies. However, because repeated oral dose studies were identified only
for samarium chloride and samarium nitrate, data with which to compare the subchronic or
chronic oral toxicities of other samarium compounds were not available. The only other data
available on the oral toxicity of samarium alone were an acute oral LD50 of 901-mg Sm/kg for
samarium nitrate in female rats (Bruce et al., 1963) and an acute oral lethality study on samarium
chloride in mice that observed no mortalities at 1172-mg Sm/kg, the highest dose tested
(Haley et al., 1961). Due to the limited information available, it is not possible to determine if
the differences in oral acute lethality and subchronic toxicity for the chloride and nitrate
compounds reflected differences in toxicokinetics of the samarium compounds. Differences in
acute lethality might also have been attributable to the animal species tested (mice vs. rats),
gender differences, or other differences in experimental methods (see discussion under Acute
Toxicity).
Weilin et al. (2006) reported increased relative pancreas and lung weights and increased
liver MDA concentrations among male and female SD rats treated with samarium nitrate in
drinking water at the lowest dose (0.438-mg [SmNOsVkg-day or 0.196-mg Sm/kg-day). This
LOAEL provides a POD from which derivation of a p-RfD for samarium nitrate was considered.
Data for relative pancreas and lung weight were modeled using U.S. EPA (2000) benchmark
19

-------
FINAL
9-17-2009
dose modeling software. However, none of the models provided adequate fit to the data, even
when the highest dose data were dropped and when nonhomogeneous models were used.
Application of the LOAEL of 0.43 8-mg (SmNC^Vkg-day or 0.196-mg Sm/kg-day as the POD
introduce an unacceptable level of uncertainty, so a p-RfD for samarium nitrate was not derived.
However, the Appendix of this document contains a screening value for samarium nitrate that
may be useful in certain instances. Please see Appendix A for details.
The Haley et al. (1961) 12-week oral toxicity study of samarium chloride in rats serves as
the critical study for derivation of the subchronic p-RfD for the chloride salt. The freestanding
NOAEL of 908-mg SmCh/kg-day or 532-mg Sm/kg-day in male rats was used to derive a
subchronic p-RfD for samarium chloride as follows:
SmCb Subchronic p-RfD	= NOAEL UF
= 908 mg Sm Cl3/kg-day^-1000
= 0.9 or 9 x 10"1 mg SmCb/kg-day
SmCl3Subchronic p-RfD as Sm = 532 mg Sm/kg-day-^ 1000
= 0.5 or 5 x 10"1 mg Sm/kg-day
The composite UF of 1000 is composed of the following:
•	A UFa of 10 is applied for interspecies extrapolation to account for potential
pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences between rats and humans.
•	A UFh of 10 is applied for intraspecies differences to account for potentially
susceptible individuals in the absence of information on the variability of
response in humans.
•	A UFd of 10 is applied for uncertainty in the database. The critical study used
only six animals per dose group and reproductive data were available only as
abstracts of Chinese studies (Hu et al., 2007; Chen et al., 2005). Hutcheson et al.
(1975) demonstrated a freestanding NOAEL of 69 mg/kg-day for reproductive
and developmental endpoints following oral exposure to a mixture of lanthanide
oxides, suggesting that the p-RfD derived for samarium chloride might be
protective for potential reproductive endpoints. However, the relative toxicities of
the oxides and chlorides of samarium could not be determined.
Given the uncertainty in relative potencies of samarium compounds, this subchronic
p-RfD should be applied only to samarium chloride.
Confidence in the principal study (Haley et al., 1961) is low. Although both genders
were tested in this study, only six animals per gender were used for each dose group, resulting in
the possibility that responses of-10% or more likely would be missed. The toxicological
evaluation in this study was limited to body-weight measures, selected hematological
parameters, and histopathology of a subset of organs. Neither serum chemistry nor urinalysis
endpoints were evaluated, nor were organ weight measurements provided. A LOAEL was not
identified. Confidence in the database on samarium is low. Apart from the critical study, the
only other oral toxicity studies conducted on samarium chloride alone were acute lethality
studies in rats and mice. Oral absorption of samarium chloride is estimated to approach zero,
based on various lines of evidence discussed in this document. There were no data to indicate
20

-------
FINAL
9-17-2009
the toxicological endpoint(s) or target organ(s) of oral exposure to stable samarium chloride. A
reproduction and developmental study on a mixture of lanthanide oxides indicated that the
mixture did not adversely affect reproduction or development; however, no studies of the
reproductive or developmental effects of stable samarium chloride alone were available. Low
confidence in the subchronic p-RfD results.
The limited available data did not provide assurance that a p-RfD based on data for either
samarium chloride or samarium nitrate would be adequate for other samarium compounds. The
Weilin et al. (2006) subchronic toxicity data for samarium nitrate suggest a LOAEL POD more
than 2000 times lower than the NOAEL POD for samarium chloride. The apparent proximity of
the acute oral LD50 of 901-mg Sm/kg for samarium nitrate in female rats (Bruce et al., 1963) and
the subchronic NOAEL of 586-mg Sm/kg-day for samarium chloride in female rats
(Haley et al., 1961) also suggests a difference in toxicity between compounds. In the absence of
evidence explaining the large differences in apparent toxicity between the chloride and nitrate
salts, the p-RfD for samarium chloride should be used with caution. The large differences in
acute and subchronic toxicity, discussed above, preclude generalization of the p-RfD for
samarium chloride to other samarium compounds.
A chronic p-RfD is not derived for any samarium compound. There were no chronic
exposure studies in any species. The uncertainties about the subchronic POD from the
Haley et al. (1961) samarium chloride feeding study preclude its extrapolation to chronic
exposures. Toxicokinetic studies of lanthanide elements indicated that light lanthanides are
deposited primarily in the liver and spleen, and secondarily in the skeleton. In their review,
Wells and Wells (2001) noted that rare earth chlorides in the liver and spleen are not readily
excreted. In addition, a portion of the skeletal burden of light lanthanides has exhibited
extremely slow retention kinetics (e.g., half-time exceeding 5 years in rats; Durbin et al., 1956).
Although long-term skeletal retention of samarium has not been evaluated, the potential for
prolonged retention of samarium in the body increases the uncertainty in extrapolating from
subchronic data to estimate effects of chronic exposure. As a consequence of the uncertainty
regarding long-term retention in the body and other uncertainties regarding the data that are
described above, no chronic p-RfD is derived for any samarium compound.
FEASIBILITY OF DERIVING PROVISIONAL SUBCHRONIC AND CHRONIC
INHALATION RfCs FOR SAMARIUM
Studies investigating the effects of inhalation exposure of humans and animals are limited
to evaluations on mixtures of rare earth metals containing samarium. Evidence for point-of-entry
effects (pulmonary lesions) associated with inhalation of mixtures of rare earth metals (Schepers,
1955a,b; Schepers et al., 1955) indicated that route-to-route extrapolation from oral data would
not be appropriate. The lack of suitable data precludes derivation of subchronic and chronic
p-RfCs for samarium.
21

-------
FINAL
9-17-2009
PROVISIONAL CARCINOGENICITY ASSESSMENT FOR SAMARIUM
Weight-of-Evidence Descriptor
Studies evaluating the carcinogenic potential of oral or inhalation exposure to samarium
in humans or animals have not been located in the available literature. Haley et al. (1961)
reported that no histological changes were found in rats orally exposed to samarium chloride for
90 days, but this study does not support a carcinogenicity assessment due to insufficient duration
of exposure and lack of a posttreatment observation period. Studies on the genotoxicity or
mutagenicity of stable samarium compounds have not been located. In accordance with the
2005 Guidelines for Cancer Risk Assessment (U.S. EPA, 2005) for chemicals with inadequate
human and animal data, this review concludes that data for stable (nonradioactive) samarium
compounds provided "Inadequate Information to Assess [the] Carcinogenic Potential" of
samarium or its compounds.
Quantitative Estimates of Carcinogenic Risk
The lack of carcinogenicity data precludes derivation of quantitative estimates of cancer
risk for nonradioactive samarium compounds.
REFERENCES
ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists). 2008. 2008 Threshold
Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices.
Cincinnati, OH.
ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). 2009. Toxicological Profile
Information Sheet. Viewed online, July 2009 at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/index.asp.
Bruce, D.W, B.E. Hietbrink, and K.P. DuBois. 1963. The acute mammalian toxicity of rare
earth nitrates and oxides. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 5:750-759.
Chen, Y., X. Xu, X. Shen et al. 2005. Influence of subchronic samarium contamination on
organ coefficient and enzyme activity of testis in mice. China Environ. Sci. 25:279-282.
Abstract only.
Colombo, F., M. Zanoni, G. Vocaturo et al. 1983. Pneumoconiosi da terre rare.
(Pneumoconiosis due to rare earth metals). Med. Lav. 74:191-197.
Deng, J.F., T. Sinks, L. Elliott et al. 1991. Characterization of respiratory health and exposures
at a sintered permanent magnet manufacturer. J. Ind. Med. 48:609-615.
Draize, H.H., G. Woodward, and H.O. Calveny. 1944. Methods for the Study of Irritation and
Toxicity of Substances Applied Topically to the Skin and Mucous Membranes. J. Pharmacol.
Exp. Ther. 83: 377-390. Cited in Lambert et al. (1990).
Durbin, P.W., M.H. Williams, M. Gee et al. 1956. Metabolism of the lanthanons in the rat.
Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 91:78-85.
22

-------
FINAL
9-17-2009
Fairweather-Tait, S.J., A.-M. Minihane, J. Eagles et al. 1997. Rare earth elements as
nonabsorbable fecal markers in studies of iron absorption. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 65:970-976.
Gardner, M.V. 1947. The blood picture of normal laboratory animals. A review of the literature,
1936-1946. J. Franklin Inst. 243:77-86. Cited in Haley et al. (1961).
Graca, J.G., F.C. Davison, and J.B. Feavel. 1962. Comparative toxicity of stable rare earth
compounds: II. Effect of citrate and edetate complexing on acute toxicity in mice and guinea
pigs. Arch. Environ. Health. 5:437-450.
Graca, J.G., F.C. Davison, and J.B. Feavel. 1964. Comparative toxicity of stable rare earth
compounds: III. Acute toxicity of intravenous injections of chlorides and chelates in dogs.
Arch. Environ. Health. 8:555-564.
Haley, T.J. 1965. Pharmacology and toxicology of the rare earth elements. J. Pharm. Sci.
54(5):663-670.
Haley, P.J. 1991. Pulmonary toxicity of stable and radioactive lanthanides. Health Physics.
61:809-821.
Haley, T.J., K. Raymond, N. Komesu et al. 1961. Toxicological and pharmacological effects of
gadolinium and samarium chlorides. Brit. J. Pharmacol. 17:526-532.
Hirano, S. and K.T. Suzuki. 1996. Exposure, metabolism and toxicity of rare earths and related
compounds. Environ. Health Perspect. 104(Suppl 1):85—95.
Hu, S-S., X-Y Shen, and X-L Xu et al. 2007. The influence of subchronic samarium
contamination on the reproductive ability of male mice, and grow of embryo and embryo rat.
China Environ. Sci. 27:648-650. Abstract only.
Hui, Y., J. Qing, and Z. Xiran. 1998. Studies on effects of yttrium chloride and praseodymium
chloride on frequency of micronucleus in human blood lymphocytes. Zhong. Yuf. Yix. Zaz.
32(3): 156-158. (Article in Chinese with an English abstract).
Husain, M.H., J.A. Dick, and Y.S. Kaplan. 1980. Rare earth pneumoconiosis. J. Soc. Occup.
Med. 30:15-19.
Hutcheson, D.P., D.H. Gray, B. Venugopal et al. 1975. Studies of nutritional safety of some
heavy metals in mice. J. Nutr. 105:670-675.
IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). 2009. IARC Monographs on the
Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Viewed online, July 2009 at
http://monoeraphs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/PDFs/index.php.
ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection). 1981. Metabolic Data for:
Praseodymium and Samarium. Limits for Intakes of Radionuclides by Workers. Pergamon
Press: New York, NY. ICRP Publication 30, Part 3:53-63.
23

-------
FINAL
9-17-2009
ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection). 1983. Radionuclide
Transformations: Energy and Intensity of Emissions. ICRP Publication 38. Report of a Task
Group of Committee 2 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection on data used
in ICRP Publication 30. Published for the International Commission on Radiological Protection
by the Pergamon Press. New York. 1250 pages.
Jha, A.M. and A.C. Singh. 1995. Clastogenicity of lanthanides: Induction of chromosomal
aberration in bone marrow cells of mice in vivo. Mutat. Res. 341:193-197.
Kappenberger, L. and A.A. Buhlmann. 1975. Lungenveranderungen durch "seltene erden."
(Lung lesions caused by "rare earths"). Schweiz. Med. Wochenschr. 105:1799-1801.
Kirk-Othmer. 1995. "Lanthanides" IN Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology,
Fourth Edition. Volume 14: Imaging Technology to Lanthanides. John Wile & Sons. New
York. Pages 1091-1115.
Kostova, I. 2005. Lanthanides as anticancer agents. Curr. Med. Chem. Anticancer Agents.
5:591-602.
Kostova, I., G. Momekov, and P. Stancheva. 2007. New samarium (III), gadolinium (III), and
dysprosium (III) complexes of coumarin-3-carboxylic acid as antiproliferative agents. Met.
Based Drugs. 2007:15925.
Kostova, I., N. Trendafilova, and G. Momekov. 2008. Theoretical, spectral characterization and
antineoplastic activity of new lanthanide complexes. J. Trace Elem. Biol. 22:100-111.
Lambert, C.E., Barnuni, E.C., and R. Shapiro. 1990. Acute Toxicological Evaluation of
Samarium Oxide. Unpublished data; viewed online July 2009 at
http ://ii t. sagepub. com/cgi/reprint/12/6/627.
Mode, V.A. 1990. Review of the literature on the toxicity of rare-earth metals as it pertains to
the engineering demonstration system surrogate test. Revision 1. Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory, University of California, Livermore, CA.
NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health). 2005. NIOSH Pocket Guide to
Chemical Hazards. Viewed online, July 2009, at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/npgsyn-a.html.
NTP (National Toxicology Program). 2005. 11th Report on Carcinogens. Viewed online, July
2009 at http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/roc/tocl 1 .htm.
NTP (National Toxicology Program). 2009. Management Status Report. Viewed online, July
2009 at http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/index.cfm?obiectid=78CC7E4C-F 1F6-975E-
72940974DE301C3F.
OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration). 2009. OSHA Standard 1910.1000
Table Z-l. Part Z, Toxic and Hazardous Substances. Viewed online, July 2009 at
https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show document?p table=STANDARDS&p id=999
2.
24

-------
FINAL
9-17-2009
Palmer, R., J.L. Butenhoff, and J.B. Stevens. 1987. Cytotoxicity of the rare earth metals cerium,
lanthanum, and neodymium: in vitro: comparisons with cadmium in a pulmonary macrophage
primary culture system. Environ. Res. 43:142-156.
Rosoff, B., E. Siegel, G.L. Williams et al. 1963. Distribution and excretion of radioactive
rare-earth compounds in mice. Int. J. App. Rad. Isot. 14:129-135.
Sabbioni, E., R. Pietra, P. Gaglione et al. 1982. Long-term occupational risk of rare-earth
pneumoconiosis: A case report as investigated by neutron activation analysis. Sci. Total
Environ. 26:19-32.
Schepers, G.W.H. 1955a. The biological action of rare earths. I. The experimental pulmonary
histopathology produced by a blend having a relatively high oxide content. A.M. A. Arch. Ind.
Health. 12:301-305.
Schepers, G.W.H. 1955b. The biological action of rare earths. II. The experimental pulmonary
histopathology produced by a blend having a relatively high fluoride content. A.M. A. Arch. Ind.
Health. 12:306-316.
Schepers, G.W.H., A.B. Delahant, and A.J. Redlin. 1955. An experimental study of the effects
of rare earths on animal lungs. A.M. A. Arch. Ind. Health. 12:297-300.
Shipler, D.B., J.E. Ballou, B.I. Griffin et al. 1975. Development of a diagnostic model for
inhaled 147promethium oxide - animal studies. Battelle, Pacific-Northwest Laboratory.
Richland, Washington. Document Number BNWL-SA-5464.
Sullivan, M.F., P.S. Ruemmlier, J.L. Ryan et al. 1986. Influence of oxidizing or reducing agents
on gastrointestinal absorption of U, Pm, Am, Cm, and Pm by rats. Health Phys. 50(2):223-232.
Sulotto, F., C. Romano, A. Berra et al. 1986. Rare-earth pneumoconiosis: A new case. Am. J.
Ind. Med. 9:567-575.
Taylor, D.M. and R.W. Leggett. 2003. A generic biokinetic model for predicting the behaviour
of the lanthanide elements in the human body. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 105(1-4): 193-198.
TERA (Toxicology Excellence for Risk Assessment). 1999. Development of Reference Doses
and Reference Concentrations for Lanthanides. Prepared for: U.S. Bureau of Land Management,
National Applied Resource Sciences Center. Viewed online, July 2009 at
http://www.tera.org/Publications/Lanthanides.pdf.
Ulusoy, U. and J.E. Whitley. 2000. Profiles of faecal output of rare earth elements and stable
isotopic tracers of iron and zinc after oral administration. Br. J. Nutr. 84:605-617.
U.S. EPA. 1988. Recommendations for and Documentation of Biological Values for Use in
Risk Assessment. Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH. NTIS
PB179874. Viewed online, July 2009 at
http://cfpub.epa. gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?deid=34855.
25

-------
FINAL
9-17-2009
U.S. EPA. 1991. Chemical Assessments and Related Activities (CARA). Office of Health and
Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC.
U.S. EPA. 1994. Chemical Assessments and Related Activities (CARA). Office of Health and
Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC.
U.S. EPA. 1997. Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables. FY-1997 Update. Prepared for
the Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment,
Cincinnati, OH for the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, DC. July.
EPA/540/R-97/036. NTIS PB 97-921199.
U.S. EPA. 2000. Benchmark Dose Technical Guidance Document. EPA/630/R-00/001. Risk
Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Viewed online,
July 2009 at http://www.epa.eov/raf/publications/pdfs/BMD-EXTERNAL 10 13 2000.PDF.
U.S. EPA. 2005. Guidelines for Cancer Risk Assessment. Risk Assessment Forum,
Washington, DC. EPA/630/P-03/001F. Viewed online, July 2009 at
http://cfpub.epa. eov/ncea/raf/recordisplav.cfm?deid=l 16283.
U.S. EPA. 2006. 2006 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories. Office
of Water, Washington, DC. EPA/822/R-06/013. Viewed online, July 2009 at
http://water.epa.gov/drink/standards/hascience.cfm.
U.S. EPA. 2009. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). Office of Research and
Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC. Viewed online,
July 2009 at http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/index.cfm?fuseaction=iris.showSubstanceList.
Vocaturo, G., F. Colombo, M. Zanoni et al. 1983. Human exposure to heavy metals: Rare earth
pneumoconiosis in occupational workers. Chest. 83:780-783.
Vogt, P., M.A. Spycher, and J.R. Ruttner. 1986. Pneumokoniose durch "seltene erden"
(cer-pneumokoniose). [Pneumoconiosis caused by "rare earths" (cer-pneumoconiosis)].
Schweiz. Med. Wochenschr. 116:1303-1308.
Waring, P.M. and R.J. Watling. 1990. Rare earth deposits in a deceased movie projectionist: A
new case of rare earth pneumoconiosis. Med. J. Aust. 153:726-730.
Weilin, S., S. Xiuying, and M. Xiying. 2006. Effects of Samarium on Liver and Kidney of Rats.
J. Rare Earths 24:415-418.
Wells W.H. and V.L. Wells. 2001. The Lanthanides, Rare Earth Metals. In: Patty^is Industrial
Hygiene and Toxicology, Fifth Edition, Volume 3, E. Bingham, B. Cohrssen, and C.H. Powell,
ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY. p. 423-458.
WHO (World Health Organization). 2009. Environmental Health Criteria Monographs.
Viewed online, July 2009 at http://www.inchem.org/paees/ehc.html.
26

-------
FINAL
9-17-2009
APPENDIX A. DERIVATION OF PROVISIONAL SUBCHRONIC AND CHRONIC
ORAL RfDs FOR SAMARIUM COMPOUNDS
For reasons noted in the main PPRTV document, it is inappropriate to derive provisional
toxicity values for samarium. However, information is available for this chemical, which,
although insufficient to support derivation of a provisional toxicity value, under current
guidelines, may be of limited use to risk assessors. In such cases, the Superfund Health Risk
Technical Support Center summarizes available information in an Appendix and develops a
"screening value." Appendices receive the same level of internal and external scientific peer
review as the PPRTV documents to ensure their appropriateness within the limitations detailed in
the document. Users of screening toxicity values in an appendix to a PPRTV assessment should
understand that there is considerably more uncertainty associated with the derivation of an
appendix screening toxicity value than for a value presented in the body of the assessment.
Questions or concerns about the appropriate use of screening values should be directed to the
Superfund Health Risk Technical Support Center.
Weilin et al. (2006) reported increased relative pancreas and lung weights and increased
liver MDA concentrations among male and female SD rats treated for 5 months with samarium
nitrate in drinking water at the lowest dose (0.438 mg [SmNC^Vkg-day or
0.196 mg Sm/kg-day). This LOAEL provides a POD from which a screening RfD for samarium
nitrate can be derived. Data for relative pancreas and lung weight were modeled using
U.S. EPA (2000) benchmark dose modeling software. However, none of the models provide
adequate fit to the data—even when the highest dose data were dropped and when
nonhomogeneous models were attempted. Consequently, the LOAEL of
0.438 mg (SmNOsVkg-day or 0.196 mg Sm/kg-day is used as the POD to derive a screening
subchronic p-RfD as follows:
Sm(N03)3 Screening Subchronic p-RfD = LOAEL ^ UF
= 0.438 mg (SmNO3)3/kg-day/10,000
= 0.0000438 mg (SmN03)3/kg-day
4 x 10"5 mg (SmN03)3/kg-day
OR
Sm(N03)3 Screening Subchronic p-RfD as Sm = 0.196 mg Sm/kg-day/10,000
= 0.0000196 mg Sm/kg-day
= 2 x 10"5 mg Sm/kg-day
The composite UF of 10,000 is made up of the following uncertainty factors:
•	A UFa of 10 is applied for interspecies extrapolation to account for potential
pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences between rats and humans.
•	A UFh of 10 is applied for intraspecies differences to account for potentially
susceptible individuals in the absence of information on the variability of
response in humans.
•	A UFl of 10 is applied for use of a LOAEL POD.
27

-------
FINAL
9-17-2009
• A UFd of 10 is applied for uncertainty in the database. The critical study used
only six animals per dose group and reproductive data were available only as
abstracts of Chinese studies (Hu et al., 2007; Chen et al., 2005). Hutcheson et al.
(1975) demonstrated a freestanding NOAEL of 69 mg/kg-day for reproductive
and developmental endpoints following oral exposure to a mixture of lanthanide
oxides, which suggests that the p-RfD derived for samarium chloride might be
protective for potential reproductive endpoints. However, the relative toxicities of
the oxides and chlorides of samarium could not be determined.
28

-------