£
<
^«Dsr'%
J) '¦
.safe
*	® U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
^ OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
Close-Out of Complaint on
Metropolitan Water Reclamation
District of Greater Chicago
Incurring Inappropriate Expenses
on Recovery Act Projects
Report No. 12-X-0090
November 22, 2011

-------
Report Contributors:	Bill Spinazzola
Patrick Mclntyre
Michael Rickey
Hotline
To report fraud, waste, or abuse, contact us through one of the following methods:
e-mail: OIG Hotline@epa.gov.	write: EPA Inspector General Hotline
phone: 1-888-546-8740	1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
fax:	202-566-2599	Mailcode 2431T
online:
http://www.epa.gov/oiq/hotline.htm.
Washington, DC 20460

-------
^tDsrx
• A v
iSi
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Inspector General
At a Glance
12-X-0090
November 22, 2011
Why We Did This Review
We received a complaint that
the Metropolitan Water
Reclamation District of Greater
Chicago may have used
noncompetitive practices when
procuring bond underwriting
contracts and incurred
excessive or inappropriate
expenses on American
Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009 (Recovery Act)-
funded projects.
Background
According to the U.S.
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Region 5, the
State of Illinois used a
combination of Clean Water
State Revolving Fund
(CWSRF) and Recovery Act
funds to provide $20 million
for four district projects. The
Recovery Act provided
$10,000,001 of the total
$20 million. The Recovery Act
funding consisted of
$5,000,002 in principal
forgiveness and $4,999,999 in
loans. The CWSRF portion was
also a loan.
Close-Out of Complaint on Metropolitan Water
Reclamation District of Greater Chicago Incurring
Inappropriate Expenses on Recovery Act Projects
What We Found
Our review did not disclose any indication of misuse of funds provided to the
district by Illinois" CWSRF loans or Recovery Act funds provided through EPA.
The types of costs mentioned in the complaint were not included in the amounts
paid to the district by the CWSRF. According to state personnel, most, if not all,
of the funding administered through the CWSRF was for construction-related
expenses. The CWSRF and Recovery Act funds did not pay for professional
services contracts or other administrative costs such as training, travel,
entertainment, or conference expenses.
Since we did not find any indication that the district misused CWSRF or
Recovery Act funds, we have closed the complaint and plan no further action on
this matter.
For further information, contact
our Office of Congressional and
Public Affairs at (202) 566-2391.
The full report is at:
www.epa.aov/oia/reports/2012/
20111122-12-X-0090.pdf

-------
<
33
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
November 22, 2011
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Close-Out of Complaint on Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of
Greater Chicago Incurring Inappropriate Expenses on Recovery Act Projects
Report No. 12-X-0090
We have closed the complaint that the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater
Chicago may have used noncompetitive practices when procuring bond underwriting contracts
and incurred excessive or inappropriate expenses on American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
of 2009 (Recovery Act)-funded projects. We concluded that U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) funds were not used for any of the expenses in question. We also referred
questions about the Build America Bond program to the Treasury Inspector General for Tax
Administration.
To assess the complaint, we performed the following procedures:
•	Interviewed personnel from Region 5, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, and
the district
•	Obtained a list of the funding that the district had received from the Illinois Clean Water
State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) since July 2005
•	Determined whether the amounts paid for with CWSRF or Recovery Act funds included
any costs for contracts with bond underwriters and/or financial advisors, training
expenses, travel and entertainment expenses, or conferences
Our review did not disclose any indications of misuse of funds provided to the district by the
CWSRF loans or Recovery Act funds provided through EPA. The types of costs mentioned in
the complaint were not included in the amounts paid to the district by the CWSRF. According to
FROM: Arthur A. Elkins, Jr.
Inspector General
TO:
Susan Hedman
Regional Administrator, Region 5
12-X-0090
1

-------
personnel at the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, most, if not all, of the funding
administered by the CWSRF was for construction-related expenses. The CWSRF did not fund
professional services contracts, or other administrative costs such as training, travel,
entertainment, or conference expenses.
According to Region 5, the CWSRF funded 16 district projects since 2005 with either loans or a
combination of loans and principal forgiveness. Four of the 16 projects included funding
authorized by the Recovery Act. Total CWSRF loans for the four projects were $20,000,000.
The Recovery Act provided $10,000,001 of the total $20 million. The $10,000,001 in Recovery
Act funding consisted of $5,000,002 in principal forgiveness and $4,999,999 in loans. We
reviewed reimbursement claims for the four Recovery Act-funded loans. As of the dates of our
review, June 21 and June 22, 2011, total claims for reimbursement were $18,485,500. None of
the four projects we reviewed included expenses for bond underwriters, financial advisors,
travel, entertainment, training, or conferences. The amounts reimbursed included only
construction costs and associated construction contingency.
The district issued capital bonds under the Recovery Act's Build America Bond program. Under
this program, the U.S. Treasury will reimburse government agencies for 35 percent of their
interest expense on the bonds. On April 29, 2010, the District received notice of an informal
inquiry relating to the 2009 Bonds by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC). The SEC requested production of all documents related to the issuance and sale of the
2009 Bonds. Further, on September 24, 2010, the Internal Revenue Service notified the district
of a routine examination of Build America bonds issued by the district during 2009 to determine
compliance with federal tax requirements. Since the Build America Bond program is outside our
authority to review, we referred questions about this program to the Treasury Inspector General
for Tax Administration for consideration.
We provided a draft copy of this memorandum to the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency,
Infrastructure Financial Assistance Section, and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of
Greater Chicago for review. Both organizations agreed with the contents of the memorandum.
Because this report contains no recommendations, you are not required to respond to this report.
The report will be made available at http://epa.gov/oig. If you or your staff have any questions
regarding this report, please contact Melissa Heist, Assistant Inspector General for Audit, at
(202) 566-0899 or heist.melissa@epa.gov; or Robert Adachi, Product Line Director, at
(415) 947-4537 or adachi.robert@epa.gov.
12-X-0090
2

-------
Status of Recommendations and
Potential Monetary Benefits
POTENTIAL MONETARY
RECOMMENDATIONS	BENEFITS (In $000s)





Planned


Rec.
Page



Completion
Claimed
Ag reed-To
No.
No.
Subject
Status1
Action Official
Date
Amount
Amount
No recommendations
1 0 = recommendation is open with agreed-to corrective actions pending
C = recommendation is closed with all agreed-to actions completed
U = recommendation is unresolved with resolution efforts in progress
12-X-0090
3

-------
Appendix A
Distribution
Regional Administrator, Region 5
Agency Follow-Up Official (the CFO)
Agency Follow-Up Coordinator
Audit Follow-Up Coordinator, Region 5
Public Affairs Officer, Region 5
Manager, Infrastructure Financial Assistance Section, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Executive Director, Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago
General Counsel, Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago
12-X-0090
4

-------