Section 319 NONPOINT SOURCE PROG ? Q USB* Cleaning Up Contaminated Sites Improves Water Quality M SOCCE Waterbody Improved Seeps from contaminated soil and contaminated groundwater contributed petroleum hydrocarbons and other pollutants to Alaska's Chena River. As a result, the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) added a 15-mile-long segment of Chena River to Alaska's 1994 Clean Water Act (CWA) section 303(d) list of impaired waters for petroleum hydrocarbons/oil and grease. Beginning in the mid-1990s, the U.S. Army cleaned up several contaminated areas. River monitoring data collected between 2005 and 2009 show that petroleum hydrocarbon levels now meet water quality standards, prompting ADEC to remove the Chena River from Alaska's 2010 CWA section 303(d) list of impaired waters for petroleum hydrocarbons/oil and grease. Problem e \ The Chena River originates about 90 miles east of the city of Fairbanks in Interior Alaska and flows into the Tanana River about three miles southwest of the city (Figure 1). The Chena Riverflows through Fort Wainwright, a U.S. Army base that is on the National Priorities List as a site with known releases or threat- ened releases of hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants. Areas of contaminated soil and groundwater were indentified around landfills, areas used for drum storage or disposal, and areas around pipelines and fuel-loading facilities. Several contami- nated areas were directly next to the Chena River. In 1992 and 1994 ADEC conducted statewide water quality assessments that indicated a suspected petroleum hydrocarbon problem on the Chena River. Documents on file indicated a visible sheen on the river, as well as reports of petroleum spills in the vicinity of the river. Reports also identified problems with elevated sediment levels in the river. Based on best professional judgment, ADEC added a 15-mile-long segment of the Chena River (Alaska ID Number 40506-007) to the 1994 CWA section 303(d) list as impaired by petroleum hydrocarbons/ oil and grease and sediment. The impaired segment extends from the mouth of the Chena River upriver to Fort Wainwright. Subsequent investigations indicated that con- taminated sites on the Fort Wainwright military base were contributing most of the petroleum products to the Chena River. While conduct- ing a Comprehensive Environmental Response, .Co Noyes Slough Qj O Chena River I Wainwright Tanana River 0 1 2 3 A b 6MLE5 Fairbanks International Airport Figure 1. The Chena River is in eastern Alaska's Tanana River watershed. Compensation and Liability Act program investiga- tion of the Chena River on Fort Wainwright, the U.S. Army found a number of samples that showed levels of petroleum-related compounds exceeding surface water and sediment criteria considered protective of aquatic life. Project Highlights The contaminated sites at Fort Wainwright con- tributed petroleum products and other chemicals to the Chena River through surface runoff and groundwater flow. The U.S. Army completed physi- cal cleanup activities at numerous contaminated Fort Wainwright sites between the late 1980s ------- Figure 2. The Army cleaned up and shading) next to the Chena and 2001 (Figure 2). For example, in 1985 the Army discovered a 45-acre area of contaminated soil and groundwater on an oxbow of the southern bank of the Chena River. The Army removed the contami- nated soil between 1993 and 1996. Shortly thereafter, the Army Installed a vapor extraction/air sparging treatment system to address groundwater contamination. A similar system was installed at a railcar off-loading facility site on the south bank of the Chena River. This area had been the site of numerous petroleum leaks and spills in the mid-1900s. Another area directly next to the Chena River had been used for drum storage from 1954 until 1974. The drums were reported to have contained diesel fuel, gasoline, jet fuel, solvents, asphalt, pesticides and lubricants. Between 1995 and 1997, the Army removed 226 drums and 850 cubic yards of contaminated soil. The Chena River also flows near an unlined landfill (installed in the early 1950s). Monitoring data from 1993 showed that the groundwater below the landfill was contaminated by numerous pollutants, including hydrocarbons that might be seeping into the Chena River. In 1997 the U.S. Army capped the inactive portion of the landfill to prevent rainwater from seeping through In addition to cleanup projects that occurred near the Chena River, the Army completed numerous other remediation projects throughout the Fort Wainwright property. :r several contaminated areas (noted by cross-hatches River on Fort Wainwright. Results periods included low- and high-water events. ADEC water quality standards require that petroleum hydrocarbons not cause a film, sheen or discol- oration on the surface or floor of the waterbody or adjoining shorelines, and that total aromatic hydrocarbons (TAH) not exceed 10 micrograms per liter. During visual assessments of the Chena River, ADEC found no sheens with odors or other charac- teristics typical of hydrocarbon sheens. Additionally, ail samples met the TAH water quality standard; in fact, TAH results have been non-detect since 2005. Because the Chena River has met water quality stan- dards for multiple years, ADEC removed it from the CWA section 303(d) list of impaired waters in 2010 for petroleum hydrocarbons/oil and grease. The river remains on the impaired waters list for sediment. Partners and Funding ADEC collected water samples and visually assessed the Chena River downstream of Fort Wainwright in 2005, 2007 and 2009. The sampling The U.S. Army coordinated with ADEC and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to investigate and remediate all known sources of environmental contamination on Fort Wainwright. The Army funded physical cleanup activities throughout the military base, including activities at numerous sites that were thought to be contributing petroleum hydrocarbons and other pollutants directly to the Chena River. ^tDSrX * m * \ w. PRO't^' ro s ffl U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water Washington, DC EPA EPA 841-F-11-001C February 2011 For additional information contact: Cindy J. Gilder Alaska Department of Conservation 907-269-3066 cindy.gilder@alaska.gov ------- |