/EDSr%,
Mz) NINPOIHT SOURCE SUCCISS STORY
'^>Qutk ptmhrtfc
Seasonal Riparian Area Management Improves Water Quality in
Skunk Creek
Waterbody ImprON-eel Sedimentation from agricultural nonpoint source pollution
degraded warmwater marginal fish habitat in 59.7 miles of Skunk
Creek. As a result, the South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR)
placed the waterbody on South Dakota's 2012 Clean Water Act (CWA) section 303(d) list due to a
total suspended solids (TSS) impairment. Natural resource agency partners collaborated on projects
to implement riparian and other best management practices (BMPs) to reduce sediment loadings.
With these improvements, DENR reclassified the Skunk Creek segment in 2016 as meeting its
beneficial uses for warmwater marginal fish life and removed it from South Dakota's CWA section
303(d) list.
Problem
Skunk Creek drains 582 square miles of land before
merging with the Big Sioux River inside the city limits
of Sioux Falls (Figure 1). Skunk Creek is an important
tributary of the Big Sioux River, providing much of
the water entering the city when the diversion dam is
closed. To meet water quality standards for TSS, the
30-day average TSS concentration must be less than or
equal to 158 milligrams per liter (mg/L) and the daily
maximum must not exceed 263 mg/L on more than
10% of the sampling dates.
Skunk Creek impairments were identified by ambi-
ent water quality monitoring (1990-2018) along with
various water quality monitoring projects including
the Central Big Sioux River Watershed Assessment
Project (2000-2001), Central Big Sioux Implementation
Monitoring Project (2005-2008), Sioux Falls Total
Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Assessment Project
(2009), and the East Dakota Water Quality Monitoring
Project (2011-2018). As a result, DENR added the
segment to the state's list of impaired waters in 2012
for failure to attain its beneficial uses for warmwater
marginal fish life due to elevated TSS. A National Water
Quality Initiative (NWQI) project was initiated with
the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA's) Natural
Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) in the Skunk
Creek watershed from 2014 to 2017 to document
water quality results and implement BMPs to reduce
bacteria, sediment, and nutrients.
Figure 1. Landowners implemented many BMPs in the Skunk
Creek watershed.
o	Ag Waste System
o	Bank Stabilization
•	Cropland BMPs
•	Grazing Management
e	Riparian Restoration/Protection
~	Skunk Creek Stations
— Big Sioux River
	Skunk Creek and Tributaries
I I County Boundaries
. Skunk Creek Watershed
I	! Sioux Falls
Skunk Creek BMP Locations
Miner

-------
Results
Figure 2. A section of Skunk Creek before (2013, left) and after
SRAM (2018, right) was implemented.
Story Highlights
Watershed partners implemented a wide variety of
BMPs including agricultural waste systems, cropland
BMPs, alternative water sources, fencing, riparian area
management, stream exclusion and bank protection.
During the restoration of Skunk Creek and other Big
Sioux reaches and tributaries, a new BMP was devel-
oped. Landowners found that the Seasonal Riparian
Area Management (SRAM) practice is an attractive
option for using land on the river corridor while also
protecting it from livestock use during the recreation
season (Figure 2). Livestock producers enrolling pas-
ture into the program were paid $60 an acre to defer
grazing from April through September but can graze in
the off-season as long as a minimum vegetation stand
of 4 inches is maintained. Haying is also allowed from
June through September; alternative water is required
if the area is grazed in the winter season. Land within
the 100-year floodplain of Skunk Creek is eligible for
the program. Over 1,200 acres of riparian area along
Skunk Creek have been entered into SRAM to date.
The SRAM practice was later used as the model for
the governor's buffer strip bill, which now applies
statewide. This innovative practice is feasible because
it meets both producers' needs and conservation
objectives. Skunk Creek became an NWQI watershed
in 2014-2017 when additional practices were Imple-
mented and water quality and other biology and
habitat data were collected. Baseline conditions for
bacteria, sediment and nutrients were established in
the Jensen Creek-Skunk Creek watershed; monitoring
continues today to test the difference between control
(no SRAM) and treatment (SRAM present) sites.
As of 2016, Skunk Creek TSS levels no longer violate
water quality standards. According to STEPL model-
ling, sediment loads have been reduced by 365 tons
per year during the Big Sioux Implementation Project
Segment 3; 2,654 tons per year during the Central Big
Sioux Implementation Project Segment 2; and 184
tons during the Central Big Sioux Implementation
Project Segment 1. Total reductions of 45,371 pounds
nitrogen; 14,331 pounds phosphorus; 3,203 tons
of sediment; and 1.9 E10 most probable number of
Escherichia coli were calculated for Skunk Creek alone
during all three implementation project segments.
Median TSS values have steadily declined across all
sites in the Skunk Creek watershed from 60 mg/L in
2011 to 28 mg/L In 2018. Acute TSS violations have
declined from 11% in 2011 to 3% in 2017. Slight
improvements in macroinvertebrate and fish commu-
nity measures between control (no-SRAM) and treat-
ment (SRAM) locations in the NWQI watershed have
been noted. As a result, Skunk Creek was removed
from the state's 303(d) list for its TSS impairment in
2016.
Partners and Funding
CWA section 319 funds specifically were used for agri-
cultural waste systems, cropland BMPs, and a variety
of riparian restoration practices. Through three project
segments spanning 13 years, CWA section 319 funds
contributed $184,059 toward BMPs. Other federal
sources, including the USDA Regional Conservation
Partnership Program and the USDA Environmental
Quality incentives Program, provided $1,024,118 to
support BMPs. State contributions include the Clean
Water State Revolving Fund (Nonpoint Source), which
granted $3,356,908—the bulk of the SRAM funding.
Local sources, including landowners and East Dakota
Water Development District, contributed $1,817,674.
The local project sponsor is the Moody County
Conservation District. Local partners include partici-
pating landowners, the city of Sioux Falls, the Lake and
Minnehaha county conservation districts, East Dakota
Water Development District, and the Big Sioux River
Watershed Steering Committee. State partners include
DENR. Federal partners include the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency and the USDA NRCS.
* m1
33
%
\
%
PRC**
ro
S
©
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Water
Washington, DC
EPA 841-F-19-Q01Q
June 2019
For additional information contact:
Kris Dozark
South Dakota DENR
605-773-5682 • Kris.Dozark@state.sd,us

-------