^6Dsrx
H •
Vy
^4 PRO^*'
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
Ensuring clean and safe water
Partnering with states and other stakeholders
Region 4 Quickly Assessed Water
Systems After Hurricane Irma but Can
Improve Emergency Preparedness
Report No. 20-P-0001
October 7, 2019

-------
Report Contributors:
Julie Hamann
Jayne Lilienfeld-Jones
Tim Roach
Johnny Ross
Khadij a Walker
Abbreviations
EPA
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
ESF
Emergency Support Function
FDEP
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
FEMA
Federal Emergency Management Agency
FlaWARN
Florida Water/Wastewater Agency Response Network
NRF
National Response Framework
OIG
Office of Inspector General
USACE
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WERT
Water Emergency Response Team
Cover Photo: EPA Region 4 mobile command post in St. Petersburg, Florida. (EPA photo)
Are you aware of fraud, waste or abuse in an
EPA program?
EPA Inspector General Hotline
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (2431T)
Washington, DC 20460
(888) 546-8740
(202) 566-2599 (fax)
OIG Hotline@epa.gov
Learn more about our OIG Hotline.
EPA Office of Inspector General
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (2410T)
Washington, DC 20460
(202) 566-2391
www.epa.gov/oiq
Subscribe to our Email Updates
Follow us on Twitter @EPAoig
Send us your Project Suggestions

-------
^EDSX
* jy \
\
vPR0^s°
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Inspector General
At a Glance
20-P-0001
October 7, 2019
Why We Did This Project
The U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency's (EPA's) Office of
Inspector General (OIG) is
conducting an audit to determine
how the EPA's preparedness and
response efforts for the three major
hurricanes of calendar year 2017—
Harvey, Irma and Maria—protected
human health and water resources
from storm-related drinking water
and surface water contamination.
This report addresses EPA
Region 4 water-related
preparedness and response efforts
for Hurricane Irma. Hurricanes
Harvey and Maria are addressed in
separate OIG reports.
Hurricane Irma made landfall in
Florida on September 10, 2017.
The National Hurricane Center
rated the hurricane as a Category 4
storm, with wind speeds of
130 miles per hour when it reached
Florida. Over half of the state's
residents were left without power
and the storm caused $50 billion in
damage to residential and
commercial property. In addition,
the storm impacted approximately
85 percent of the state's drinking
water and wastewater facilities.
This report addresses the
following:
•	Ensuring clean and safe water.
•	Partnering with states and
other stakeholders.
•	Operating efficiently and
effectively.
Address inquiries to our public
affairs office at (202) 566-2391 or
OIG WEBCOMMENTS@epa.oiq.
List of OIG reports.
Region 4 Quickly Assessed Water
Systems After Hurricane irma but Can
Improve Emergency Preparedness
What We Found
The EPA completed its Hurricane Irma mission
assignment, to assess water systems, within a
15-day period. Region 4's water emergency
response team gathered and reported data on
the status of drinking and wastewater facilities
and response efforts in Florida—the only state
where the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) tasked Region 4 with a mission assignment. The state's
drinking water and wastewater facilities returned to service within days or
weeks after the hurricane, limiting the public's exposure to contaminated
water.
Region 4's close working relationship with the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection and the development of a supplemental
database to complement the state's water and wastewater data systems
were key factors in protecting human health and water resources in the
aftermath of Hurricane Irma. Region 4 developed a draft standard
operating procedure for managing an emergency response in 2010,
which was revised in 2012, that addresses these issues, but the
procedure was never finalized. We found that some EPA staff members
were unfamiliar with some of the region's internal emergency response
protocols. We also found that the Water Division had not conducted any
emergency response training or exercises with its state partners in
preparation for Hurricane Irma. By finalizing procedures and conducting
regular training, Region 4 can improve the efficiency and effectiveness of
its response efforts.
Recommendations and Planned Agency Corrective Actions
We recommend that the EPA Region 4 Regional Administrator direct the
Water Division to finalize its standard operating procedure for disaster
response and conduct annual hurricane emergency response exercises with
state partners.
Region 4 agreed with the two recommendations and implemented corrective
actions for Recommendation 2 by beginning to conduct annual hurricane
emergency response exercises with state partners. The corrective actions for
Recommendation 2 are complete upon issuance of this report. A corrective
action for Recommendation 1—finalizing a standard operating procedure for
disaster response—is pending.
EPA staff training with
state partners and
development of standard
operating procedures
could improve
emergency response.

-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
OFFICE OF
INSPECTOR GENERAL
October 7, 2019
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Region 4 Quickly Assessed Water Systems After Hurricane Irma but Can Improve
Emergency Preparedness
Report No. 20-P-0001
This is our report on the subject assignment conducted by the Office of Inspector General (OIG) of the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The project number for this audit was OPE-FY18-0005.
This report contains findings that describe the problems that the OIG has identified and corrective
actions the OIG recommends. This report represents the opinion of the OIG and does not necessarily
represent the final EPA position. Final determinations on matters in this report will be made by EPA
managers in accordance with established audit resolution procedures.
The EPA Region 4 Regional Administrator is responsible for the issues discussed in this report.
In accordance with EPA Manual 2750, your office provided acceptable corrective actions and milestone
dates in response to OIG recommendations. Recommendation 1 is resolved with corrective action
pending, while Recommendation 2 is completed with no further action required. No final response to
this report is required. However, if you submit a response, it will be posted on the OIG's website, along
with our memorandum commenting on your response. Your response should be provided as an Adobe
PDF file that complies with the accessibility requirements of Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended. The final response should not contain data that you do not want to be released to the
public; if your response contains such data, you should identify the data for redaction or removal along
with corresponding justification.
FROM:
Charles J. Sheehan, Deputy Inspector General
TO:
Mary S. Walker, Regional Administrator
Region 4
We will post this report to our website at www.epa.gov/oig.

-------
Region 4 Quickly Assessed Water Systems
After Hurricane Irma but Can Improve
Emergency Preparedness
20-P-0001
Table of C
Purpose		1
Background		1
Responsible Office		3
Scope and Methodology		3
Results		4
Areas for Improvement		5
Recommendations		6
Agency Response and OIG Evaluation		6
Status of Recommendations and Potential Monetary Benefits		7
Appendices
A Agency Response 		8
B Supplemental Agency Response 		11
C Distribution		12

-------
Purpose
The Office of Inspector General (OIG) is conducting an audit to determine how
the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) preparedness and response
efforts for the three major hurricanes of calendar year 2017—Harvey, Irma and
Maria—protected human health and water resources from storm-related drinking
water and surface water contamination.
This report contains our findings and recommendations related to Hurricane
Irma preparation and response efforts for water issues in EPA Region 4—
Florida, in particular. Hurricane Irma also affected parts of Georgia, but
Georgia did not request the EPA's assistance with the state's emergency
response. Therefore, we did not include any information regarding Georgia's
emergency response activities.
On July 16, 2019, the OIG i ssued a report assessing EPA Region 6's
preparedness and response efforts pertaining to water issues associated with
Hurricane Harvey.1 The OIG will issue a subsequent report that will address
EPA Region 2's response relating to water issues during Hurricane Maria.
Background
Hurricane Irma made landfall in Florida on September 10, 2017, striking the
Florida Keys and then moving north through the state and into Georgia. The
National Hurricane Center rated the hurricane as a Category 4 storm, with wind
speeds of 130 miles per hour when it
reached Florida In Irma's wake, over half
the state's residents were without power,
and the storm caused $50 billion in
damages to residential and commercial
property.
In addition, the storm impacted
approximately 85 percent of Florida's
drinking water and wastewater facilities.
The large volume of rainwater from
Hurricane Irma caused approximately
600 sewer overflows, which occur when
wastewater treatment facilities release
untreated stormwater and sewage into
waterways, potentially exposing residents
to harmful bacteria and pathogens. To protect human health, Florida drinking
water systems issued 500 "boil water" notices after the hurricane. Residents who
1 EPA Region 6 Quickly Assessed Water Infrastructure after Hurricane Harvey but Can Improve Emergency Outreach to
Disadvantaged Communities, 19-P-0236. July 16, 2019.
Hurricane Irma left over half of Florida
residents without power, (Florida Department
of Environmental Protection photo)
20-P-0001
1

-------
followed these notices reduced their risk of exposure to pathogens that may have
been present in their drinking water.
With few exceptions, the EPA responds to a federally declared disaster under the
direction of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). To facilitate
an integrated federal approach to emergency response, all federal agencies adhere
to the National Response Framework (NRF). The NRF includes 15 Emergency
Support Functions (ESFs), which FEMA uses to coordinate the resources and
capabilities most needed in a national response (Table 1). Under an ESF, FEMA
issues mission assignments to federal agencies to direct the completion of specific
tasks, such as the inspection of water utilities or cleanup of hazardous waste.
Table 1: National Response Framework ESFs
1
Transportation
9
Search and Rescue
2
Communications
10
Oil and Hazardous Materials
3
Public Works and Engineering*
11
Agriculture and Natural Resources
4
Firefighting
12
Energy
5
Information and Planning
13
Public Safety and Security
6
Mass Care, Emergency Assistance,
Temporary Housing and Human Services
14
Superseded by the National Disaster
Recovery Framework
7
Logistics
15
External Affairs/Standard Operating
8
Public Health and Medical Services

Procedures
* EPA-supported ESF in response to Hurricane Irma
Source: OIG analysis of U.S. Department of Homeland Security data.
When federal agencies respond to a mission assignment, the FEMA-led National
Incident Management System and Incident Command System detail how the
federal government can implement the NRF in a unified manner. The National
Incident Management System integrates existing best practices into a consistent
nationwide approach to respond to domestic emergencies. The Incident
Command System establishes a common organizational structure for managing
resources, making decisions and assigning tasks. It also establishes a chain of
command structure.
In response to the declaration of Hurricane Irma as a federal disaster, FEMA
issued a mission assignment to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). In
turn, on September 13, the USACE tasked the EPA under ESF #3—Public
Works and Engineering (see Table 1). Region 4's Water Protection Division
activated its Water Emergency Response Team (WERT) to develop processes
and procedures to rapidly review this critical infrastructure following a natural
or manmade disaster.2 Under ESF #3, the USACE is the lead agency while the
EPA is the support agency in identifying critical drinking water and wastewater
needs.
2 As of April 2019, the Region 4 Water Protection Division is now the Region 4 Water Division. For purposes of
clarity in this report, from this point on we will refer to this office as the Water Division.
20-P-0001
2

-------
Under the ESF #3 mission assignment, the region activated the Region 4 WERT
to assess and report on the status of drinking and wastewater facilities, provide
on-site technical assistance, and coordinate response efforts. The Region 4 Water
Division deployed staff members in-place to a call center located in the regional
office. The region deployed three staff members to the Tallahassee, Florida,
emergency operations center. The Region 4 WERT, US ACE and Florida
Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) staff worked together to assess
the operational status of drinking water and wastewater facilities, designating
each one as Operational, Partially Operational, Non-Operational or Unknown.
In total, Region 4 and US ACE staff completed 2,227 assessments of drinking
water and wastewater facilities. Region 4 staff deployed in Florida conducted
eleven on-site assessments, and the balance were conducted by telephone.
During the assessments, Region 4 staff also determined equipment needs and
provided limited technical assistance to facilities.
Region 4 compiled daily reports on drinking water and wastewater facilities'
status to FEMA, the US ACE and the FDEP. The daily status updates were also
used to brief Region 4 and EPA Headquarters management on the status of the
agency's response to Hurricane Irma.
Responsible Office
EPA Region 4's Water Division is responsible for working closely with federal
agencies, states, and local governments to respond quickly to water-related
environmental concerns and natural disasters, including hurricanes.
Scope and Methodology
We conducted our work from May 2018 to August 2019. We conducted this
performance audit in accordance with generally accepted government auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings
and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe that the evidence
obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on
our audit objectives.
We reviewed FEMA's ESF #3 mission assignment for Region 4, hurricane
response activity reports for Region 4, and documents about federal emergency
response such as the NRF and ESFs. We interviewed Region 4 and FDEP staff
who participated in the Irma response. We also conducted a site visit to
Everglades City in Florida, one of the areas most impacted by Hurricane Irma.
20-P-0001
3

-------
Results
Region 4 completed its Hurricane Irma mission assignment within a 15-day
period following the mission assignment. The state's drinking water and
wastewater facilities returned to service within days or weeks after the
hurricane, limiting the public's exposure to contaminated water. We identified
two factors that enabled Region 4 to complete its ESF #3 mission assignment in
Florida within 15 days:
1. The region worked closely with the state. Prior to the hurricane's
landfall, Region 4's Water Division contacted the FDEP to inquire about
whether the state needed resources from the EPA. The regional outreach
set a tone of cooperation for the length of the response engagement by
approaching the state staff as partners, rather than as regulators. In
addition, three members of the WERT deployed under a USACE-led
mission assignment to co-locate with the FDEP Drinking Water
Program Administrator in Tallahassee and assisted the FDEP's newly
appointed Drinking Water Program Administrator under ESF #3. The
WERT assisted the FDEP to successfully conduct the state's response
activities. One of the WERT members had years of experience in
hurricane response in Florida and previously worked for the FDEP. This
aided in creating good working relationships with state staff.
2. The region created a supplemental database to track the status of
drinking water and wastewater facilities. EPA Region 4 used Florida's
existing data system, Storm Tracker, to contact and document the
operational status of drinking water and wastewater facilities. However,
this system did not contain information for smaller non-community
facilities, such as drinking water facilities at a school or truck stop. The
region was concerned with facilities not listed in Storm Tracker. To
supplement the information in Storm Tracker, the region created a
dashboard (see image) showing all facilities that needed to be reviewed
and their operational status tracked.
The creation of this supplemental
listing of facilities, in conjuncti on
with Storm Tracker, provided the
region a more complete list of
facilities. This enabled Region 4 staff
to provide the FDEP and Region 4
senior management the real-time
information needed to quickly
determine the operational status of
facilities and direct resources to those
facilities most in need of assistance.
Hurricane Irma Response Dashboard

AFPA
m ¦

• •
Rortda Community W«tt* Florid* Non Community
Sy»Sern»	W#1*r Syrtcn*

Sample screenshot of dashboard the Water Division used during
Hurricane Irma Response. (EPA screenshot)
20-P-0001
4

-------
As the state and regional staff tracked facility status, Florida's independent utility
networks helped small drinking water and wastewater facilities quickly return to
"operational" status. The Florida Water/Wastewater Agency Response Network
(FlaWARN) is a system of "utilities helping
utilities" that offers response assistance during
emergency situations.
While Region 4's mission assignment was
limi ted to the review of water and wastewater
facilities, FlaWARN helped facilities become
operational by transporting generators, and
providing support personnel and other resources.
Additionally, the Florida Rural Water
Association, an independent non-profit
organization, helped smaller rural and remote
facilities become operational. Together, the
region, the state and the independent networks
worked to bring facilities back online and
resume operations quickly.
Areas for Improvement
While the Region 4 Water Division completed its mission assignment within a 15-
day period, with additional training and proper guidance, Region 4 can improve
water-related emergency response planning for possible future emergencies.
Federal standards emphasize conducting planning activities to improve disaster
response. For example, standard operating procedures can provide a central
source of information on how disaster responses should proceed and conclude,
and cross-governmental training exercises help federal agencies, states, and others
to practice coordinating their response activities before disasters occur.
We identified two ways the Water Division can improve its emergency response
preparation for possible future hurricane response activities:
1. Standard operating procedure: In 2010 the Region 4 Water Division
developed a draft standard operating procedure that serves as a mechanism
to train and deploy water sector personnel in response to state agencies'
requests for assistance when disasters occur. It was revised in 2012 to
addresses issues of training and deployments, but it was neither finalized
nor fully utilized.
Some staff reported that they were unfamiliar with the Water Division's
internal procedure for emergency response. In addition, a staff person
reported that he or she was not aware of the requirements for deployment
or the selection criteria for those who are deployed. A staff person
An EPA response team meets for a safety briefing
before assessing sites in Tampa, Florida. (EPA photo)
20-P-0001
5

-------
reported that a lack of training about the Incident Command System
hampered overall effectiveness of the response. By finalizing the draft
standard operating procedure, the Water Division can improve the
information staff and management have for preparing for and responding
to emergencies.
2. Training and exercises: Water Division staff said that they had not
participated in any pre-storm simulations or exercises to prepare for
potential emergency responses in preparation for Hurricane Irma. During
our audit, in 2018, the Water Division held a training event with Region 4
states that focused on emergency response activities for the drinking water
and wastewater sectors. Participants also included the US ACE and FEMA.
By conducting annual Water Division training on hurricane response, the
region can improve its preparedness for an actual emergency response.
Recommendations
We recommend that the Regional Administrator, Region 4:
1.	Direct the Water Division to finalize its standard operating procedure for
disaster response.
2.	Conduct annual hurricane emergency response exercises with federal and
state partners.
Agency Response and OIG Evaluation
The Regional Administrator provided a response to this draft report addressing
the two recommendations (Appendix A). The agency later supplemented its
response with estimated completion dates for the corrective actions (Appendix B).
Region 4 concurred with the two recommendations and implemented corrective
actions for Recommendation 2 by beginning to conduct annual water sector
hurricane emergency response coordination and training exercises with state and
federal partners in 2018 and 2019. Therefore, the corrective actions for
Recommendation 2 are completed upon issuance of the final report.
The planned corrective action for Recommendation 1 meets the intent of our
recommendation. Region 4 Water Division plans to review, and update as needed,
the division's standard operating procedure for water sector disaster responses.
Recommendation 1 is resolved with the corrective action pending.
20-P-0001
6

-------
Status of Recommendations and
Potential Monetary Benefits
RECOMMENDATIONS
Rec.
No.
Page
No.
Subject
Status1
Action Official
Planned
Completion
Date
Potential
Monetary
Benefits
(in $000s)
1
6
Direct the Water Division to finalize its standard operating
procedure for disaster response.
R
Regional Administrator,
Region 4
3/30/20

2
6
Conduct annual hurricane emergency response exercises with
federal and state partners.
C
Regional Administrator,
Region 4
8/27/19

1 C = Corrective action completed.
R = Recommendation resolved with corrective action pending.
U = Recommendation unresolved with resolution efforts in progress.
20-P-0001
7

-------
Appendix A
Agency Response
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 4
ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER
61 FORSYTH STREET
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960
AUG 21 2019
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: EPA Region 4 Response to OIG Draft Report on the Region's Water Emergency
Response to Hurricane Irma
OIG Project No. OPE-FY18-0005
FROM:	Mary S. Walker, Regional Administrator
Region 4
TO:	Kathlene Butler, Director
Water Directorate
Office of Audit and Evaluation
Thank you for the opportunity to review the Office of Inspector General (OIG) draft report on the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 4's response to Hurricane Irma in 2017. As noted in the
draft report, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Program Administrator stated
"Without EPA's ... assistance, we would not have gotten through it [Hurricane Irma] as easy..." Region
4 is proud of our work during this response and believe we successfully provided timely and substantial
assistance to the requests of FDEP and our federal partners in support of the water sector Mission
Assignment we received. We suggest that the title of the report be modified to reflect this success. We
have included the following additional factual corrections. With these changes, we concur with the
findings. We also include below our response to the draft recommendations.
Comments to the Report
p. 1 - In the "Purpose" section the report indicates that audit was conducted to look at preparedness and
response to Hurricanes Harvey, Irma and Maria. The section further indicates how each hurricane except
for Harvey is being addressed. For purposes of completeness, the report should include a discussion of
how, or if, the OIG will evaluate the Agency's response to Hurricane Harvey.
p. 2, 2nd paragraph below the Table 1 - The dates in the draft report indicate the Region 4 Water
Emergency Response Team (WERT) activated on September 18th and remained active through September
27, 2017. Our records indicate that the WERT initiated activation on September 6, 2017. Attachment A
to this memorandum is the email (September 6, 2017) documenting the call. In addition, we deployed
three WERT members to Tallahassee from September 12 - 28, 2017. One Water Protection Division
manager and two staff were deployed in response to an ESF-3 Mission Assignment from the USACE to
20-P-0001
8

-------
assist them and FDEP with the assessment of drinking water and wastewater infrastructure impacted by
Hurricane Irma. On page 2, the draft report states "From September 18 to September 27, 2017, Region 4's
Water Protection Division activated... (WERT) to develop processes and procedures to rapidly review
and repair this critical infrastructure..." This statement should be modified to clarify the earlier activation
and deployments, as well as to clarify that the WERT assistance was for assessment not repair of
infrastructure.
p. 3, first full paragraph - The draft report states "completed telephone and on-site water and...." This
sentence should be clarified to indicate "on-site drinking water and ...." This paragraph also indicates
that "Region 4 compiled Emergency Management Reports for internal use." We believe a more accurate
statement would be "In addition, Region 4 compiled a daily system status table for drinking water and
wastewater facilities. This information was provided to USACE for their internal reporting and to FEMA
(as lead for ESF #3), to FDEP, and was posted in the Region's daily Situation Report which was used to
brief Regional and EPA Headquarters management on the status of the Agency's response to Hurricane
Irma."
p. 4, second paragraph in Factor 1 - The first sentence of this paragraph should be clarified to indicate
that three members of the WERT deployed under an USACE ESF #3 mission assignment to co-locate
with the FDEP Drinking Water Program Administrator in Tallahassee.
OIG Recommendations
1.	Direct the Water Protection Division to finalize its standard operating procedure for disaster response.
The Region concurs with this recommendation. The Water Division (Note: The name of the division
changed in the Region's realignment and is now called "Water Division.") is in the process of assessing
the 2012 document called "Water Protection Division Emergency Response and Recovery Team (WPD-
ERRT)" and updating the document to reflect current operational practices.
2.	Conduct annual hurricane emergency response exercises with federal and state partners.
The Region concurs with this recommendation and has already implemented additional communication,
training and response exercises with federal and state partners. In 2018, the Water Division hosted a
disaster preparedness meeting in Florida in advance of Hurricane Season which was attended by most
Region 4 states. EPA Region 4 OSCs as well as FEMA participated in the hurricane emergency response
workshop. The Water Division also held a webinar in August 2019 with our state partners, in lieu of an
in-person workshop, to once again prepare for the 2019 Hurricane Season. In this session, we reviewed
how states can request federal assistance, outlined services the Region can provide and clarified water
system status reporting expectations during declared disasters. Most recently, in July 2019, the region
held Water Sector Emergency Response training to prepare our WERT to assist the states in the event of
an ESF 3 mission assignment. We had 35 attendees. Lastly, the Water Division Director discussed
Emergency Response during the EPA/State Water Directors' Meeting as well as at State visits that are
conducted yearly with each state. The same information as provided in the webinar was reiterated at this
higher level.
The Water Division also participates in regional preparedness events and has been training new staff in
incident command. For instance, WERT members participated in FEMA's "Shaken Fury" earthquake
response training exercise earlier this summer with participating state agencies. The Region is committed
to continuing these coordination and training events for our own Regional staff, and with federal and state
partners for the water sector.
20-P-0001
9

-------
Again, thank you for the opportunity to review and respond to the report. If you need additional
information or have clarifying questions, please contact Jeaneanne M. Gettle, Director, Water Division at
404-562-8979 or gettle.ieaneanne@epa.gov.
20-P-0001
10

-------
Appendix B
Supplemental Agency Response
Agreements
No.
Recommendation
High Level Intended
Corrective Action
Estimated Completion
1.
Conduct annual
hurricane emergency
response exercises with
federal and state
partners.
EPA Region 4 will hold
annual water sector
hurricane emergency
response coordination
and training exercises
with state and federal
partners.
Region 4 recognized this as a
need and began holding water
sector hurricane emergency
response coordination and
training exercises with Region 4
coastal states in the summer of
2018. Another water sector
hurricane response training and
coordination event was held
during the summer of 2019. The
Region intends to continue these
annually.
2.
Direct the Water
Protection Division to
finalize its standard
operating procedure for
disaster response.
EPA Region 4 Water
Division will review, and
update as needed, the
Division's standard
operating procedure for
water sector disaster
responses.
EPA Region 4 will finalize the
Water Division's standard
operating procedure document
on or before March 30, 2020.
20-P-0001
11

-------
Distribution
The Administrator
Assistant Deputy Administrator
Associate Deputy Administrator
Chief of Staff
Deputy Chief of Staff
Assistant Administrator for Water
Regional Administrator, Region 4
Agency Follow-Up Official (the CFO)
Agency Follow-Up Coordinator
General Counsel
Associate Administrator for Congressional and Intergovernmental Relations
Associate Administrator for Public Affairs
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Water
Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator for Water
Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 4
Director, Superfund and Emergency Management Division, Region 4
Director, Water Division, Region 4
Director, Office of Continuous Improvement, Office of the Administrator
Audit Follow-Up Coordinator, Office of the Administrator
Audit Follow-Up Coordinator, Office of Water
Audit Follow-Up Coordinator, Region 4
20-P-0001

-------