EPA/905/9-90/003
REPORT CN GREAT LAKES CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITIES
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW BRANCH
PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT DIVISION
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, REGION 5
AUGUST, 1990
-------
REPORT CM GREAT LAKES CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITIES
1. PURPOSE
This report will provide an overview of the confined disposal facilities for
dredged materials on the Great Lakes. The report will discuss the purpose and
authority for these facilities, the regulation of dredge and fill activities,
the process by which these facilities are planned and constructed, and
summarize the design, operation and monitoring of confined disposal
facilities. More detailed information about the individual facilities which
have been constructed is also provided. This report is a carpilation of
existing information on confined disposal facilities and is intended to be
used as a reference document. Information provided in tabular form will be
updated periodically.
2. INTRODUCnCW
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is authorized to maintain sane 131
navigation projects around the Great Lakes. These projects include harbors
and channels for conmercial and recreational navigation users. Maintenance
requires the repair and rehabilitation of navigation structures, such as
breakwaters, piers and locks, and the periodic dredging of sediments from
navigation channels. The Corps dredges approximately 4 million cubic yards of
sediments annually from navigation projects around the Great Lakes. The
amount of sediments dredged, as well as the depths and frequency of dredging
are project specific.
Up until the mid 1960's, dredged material was disposed with economics as the
key concern. This meant unconfined, open-water disposal in most cases. In
the mid 1960's, environmental concerns were raised about the degradation of
water quality in the Great Lakes. These concerns primarily focused on the
eutrophication of the lakes, and controls on the pollutional loadings of
nutrients"such as phosphorus and nitrogen. The practice of open water
disposal of dredging from polluted harbors and waterways was criticized and
called into question.
In 1966, the Corps began investigating the feasibility of using alternate
disposal areas at a number of harbors. In 1967, the Corps, in cooperation
with the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration (the predecessor of
USEFA) initiated a pilot investigation to obtain acceptable solutions to the
dredged disposal problem. A variety of disposal alternatives were
investigated and pilot projects included the first confined disposal
facilities constructed on the Great Lakes.
The Corps completed a two year study Dredging and Water Quality Problems in
the Great- r-akps in 1969 (USAGE, 1969). This 12-volume report examined the
pollutional status of the Great Lakes, provided a detailed look at existing
dredging and disposal practices, described the effects of these operations on
water quality, and examined potential modifications and control measures to
abate environmental impacts. This study could not document substantial
impacts on water quality or benthic conrnunities. Iirpacts were of a transient
-------
nature. The report concluded, though, that open water disposal of polluted
dredged material is "presumptively" undesirable. Recommendations of this
report included additional research on the environmental effects of dredging
and disposal and the development of a program for the confinement of polluted
dredged material around the Great Lakes.
In 1970, Congress authorized two programs which were to have a major impact on
the dredging and disposal practices of the Corps through the passage of Public
Law 91-611. The Diked Disposal Program was initiated to provide funding for
construction of diked disposal facilities to contain polluted dredged
materials on the Great Lakes. The same law authorized the program to examine
the environmental effects of dredging and disposal. The Corps* Waterways
Experiment Station (WES) was tasked to manage this research program.
3. DREDGED MATERIAL RESEARCH
The CHRP was conducted between 1973-1978 at a cost of $33 million. In all,
scxne 270 individual studies were conducted. About two-thirds were completed
by universities, private research laboratories, and other federal agencies.
About one-third of the studies were ccnpleted by the Corps. The major
conclusions of the fflRP as summarized in the Executive Overview and Detailed
Sunmary report (USAGE, 1978) are as follows:
"The first is that there is no single disposal alternative that presunptively
is suitable for a region or group of projects. Correspondingly, there is no
single disposal alternative that presunptively results in iirpacts of such a
nature that it can be categorically dismissed from consideration."
"The second basic conclusion is that environmental considerations are acting
more strongly than possibly any force to necessitate long-range regional
planning as a lasting, effective solution to disposal problems. No longer can
disposal alternatives be planned independently for each dredging operation for
multiple projects in a given area."
"Turning to inland and coastal waters, the EMRP achieved definite results that
soundly substantiate that the most widely held fears over the short-term
release of contaminants to disposal site waters are unfounded. As long as
the geochanical environment is not basically changed, most contaminants are
not released from the sediment particles to the water. However, in contrast,
upland disposal often results in a change in the geochanical environment that
can lead to contaminant release. Sane nutrients, such as ammonium and
manganese and iron are released in open-water disposal, but in most cases
enough mixing is present to rapidly dilute these to harmless concentrations."
"If a confined disposal site is to be effective from an environmental
protection standpoint, it must be efficient in retaining a high percentage of
the finer soil particles, for it is these clays and silts that carry the
contaminants. These are admittedly the materials most difficult to retain in
an area, but if they can be, the effluents should be essentially nontoxic
except for occasional situations where nutrient levels and oxygen depletion
may be excessive."
-2-
-------
Since the completion of the EMRP a number of other research programs dealing
with dredged materials have been conducted by or for the Corps:
Field Verification Program (FVP)
Long-Term Effects of Dredging Operations Program (LEDO)
Dredging Operations Technical Support Program (DOTS)
Environmental Effects of Dredging Program (EED)
Numerous technical reports and newsletters have been distributed from these
programs. In addition, proceedings from seminars and meetings sponsored by a
variety of groups dealing with dredging and disposal have been published, such
as:
ASCE Conference on Dredging and its Environmental Effects, 1976
US-Japan Experts Meeting on Management of Bottom Sediments
Containing Toxic Substances, Annual
ASCE Conference on Dredging and Dredged Material Disposal, 1984
In addition, reports from many authors have been presented in scientific and
engineering journals dealing with dredging, disposal, -and sediment-water-
biological interactions.
4. REGULATION OF DREDGE AND FILL ACTIVITIES
Dredge and fill activities are specifically regulated under sections of the
Clean Water Act of 1972, as amended (CWA). Section 404 designates the Corps
as the leM federal agency in the regulation and enforcement of dredge and
fill activities using guidelines and criteria developed by the USEPA. Permits
for the placement of fill materials into waters of the United States are
issued through corps District offices. In many places, the corps and State
have cooperative permitting programs.
For the disposal of maintenance dredging conducted by the Corps, the corps
does not issue itself a permit. The Corps must comply with the same
procedural requirements as a private citizen and permit authority is
transferred to the State.
Section 401 of the CWA provides the State (usually the environmental
regulatory agency of the State) authority to issue certification of dredge and
fill activities. Ihis certification indicates that the proposed fill or
dredged disposal will not violate State water quality standards or criteria.
The corps obtains 401 certification from State agencies for the disposal of
dredged materials to the open lake and for the discharge (effluent) from a
confined disposal facility.
5. DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL GUIDELINES
Section 404(b) directed the USEPA to develop guidelines for dredged material
disposal decisionmaking in conjunction with the Corps. Hie USEPA Region V
published its "404 (b) (1) Guidelines for Specification of Disposal Sites for
Dredged or Fill Material" on 24 December 1980. These guidelines are published
as 40 CFR, Part 230.
-3-
-------
The purpose of the 404 (b)(1) guidelines is to "restore and maintain the
chemical, physical and biological integrity of material." Hie guidelines
discuss the type of evaluation to conducted, including general guidance as to
the chemical, physical and biological testing that should be performed, as
well as potential impacts on human water use and the aquatic ecosystem.
The USEPA, Region V, published its "Guidelines for the Pollutional
Classification of Great Lakes Harbor Sediments" in 1977. These guidelines are
shown in Table 1, and may be consulted as part of the chemical
characterization portion of the 404 (b)(1) evaluation. Other information,
such as physical properties of the sediments, elutriate tests, bioassays,
color, odor, and an assessment of the types of benthic organisms found in the
sediment can also be used in the 404 (b)(1) evaluation. These additional
tests are summarized in Table 2.
6. DREDGED DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVES
Since the mid 1960's maintenance dredging from federal navigation projects in
the Great Lakes have been disposed of in one of two ways, unconfined disposal
or into a confined disposal facility. Of the approximately 4 million cubic
yards dredged annually from the Great Lakes by the Corps in recent years,
about half was suitable for unconfined disposal and half placed in existing
confined disposal facilities.
Unconfined disposal options include unconfined open water disposal, restricted
open water disposal, and unconfined upland disposal. Unconfined disposal of
suitable dredged materials can be conducted in several ways. In most cases,
dredged material is placed in bottom-dunp scows or hoppers which are
transported to a disposal site 1-5 miles offshore. Near-shore disposal is the
same, except that the dredgings are discharged in shallow water (8-12 feet) in
order to alleviate shoreline erosion problems. Beach nourishment is the
placement of dredgings directly on a beach to replace eroded material or
expand an existing beach. Dredged material may also be placed on land and
used in construction or as part of a general fill.
Confined disposal, as the name implies, involves the placanent of dredged
materials into a site or facility prepared to contain the dredged materials.
A confined disposal facility (CDF) is an upland or in-water structure
constructed solely for the disposal of polluted dredged materials. The Corps
of Engineers has constructed some 30 confined disposal facilities around the
Great Lakes since the late 1960's for the disposal of polluted dredged
materials frctn navigation projects. The locations of these CDFs are shown in
Figure 1. Five CDFs (not shown) have been constructed in Canada. Of the
facilities built by the Corps around the Great Lakes, "eight are upland CDFs
and 22 are in-water facilities.
Upland confined disposal facilities may be formed by the construction of
earthen dikes or use of existing pits or depressions. In-water CDFs are
generally formed by stone-filled dikes similar in appearance to a breakwater.
The size and shape of a CDF are determined by the required storage capacity
and local site conditions.
-------
7. CDF PLANNING AND CCNSTRUCITCW
The majority of existing CDFs on the Great Lakes were constructed under the
Diked Disposal Program (PL 91-611, Section 123). This law had specific
requirements for the funding of a CDF. Under this law, the Corps was
authorized to construct facilities for the disposal of 10-years volume of
maintenance dredgings from federal navigation project(s).
The law also required that there must be a local sponsor for the CDF, except
for disposal of dredged materials from the Great Lakes Connecting Channels in
Michigan. Local sponsors were typically a City, county or State governmental
agency. The local sponsor was required to provide all lands, easements, and
rights of way to the Corps for the CDF site. The local sponsor was also
required to provide 25% of the funds for the construction of the CDF. This
local cost share could, however, be waived if the USEPA certified that the
area was in compliance with an approved water quality program. The local
sponsor would receive title to the CDF after it was filled and be responsible
for its maintenance.
In many cases, local sponsors have planned or implemented productive and
beneficial uses for CDFs. These uses have included the development of
recreation areas, new or expanded marinas, wildlife refuges, etc. The planned
development must be compatible with the environmental integrity of the
facility and these lands cannot be transferred from the local sponsor without
the approval of the Corps.
The process by which most of the existing CDFs on the Great Lakes were planned
and constructed can be divided into several key steps.:
Site Selection
Identification of Local Sponsor
Environmental Impact Statement
Detailed Design
Local Cooperation Agreement
Obtainment of Appropriate Permits
Construction
The above is an open, public process with a number of opportunities for input
and corrment. it is also a very slow process. Site selection alone has taken
ten years or longer in a few cases. It is fair to state that the decisions
made during site selection are the most difficult and controversial. The
responsiblities and priorities of federal and state regulatory agencies must
be balanced with the needs of the prospective local sponsors.
In recent years, the Corps has phased out the construction of CDFs under the
authority of PL 91-611. Future maintenance dredging will still require
confined disposal. Future CDFs will be constructed under the operation and
maintenance (O&M) authorities of individual navigation projects. The extent
of local participation and cost-sharing for these projects will vary on a
project-by-project basis.
-5-
-------
8. CDF DESIGNS AND OPERATION
There is no single, best CDF design. The structural and environmental design
is very site specific. The configuration of a CDF in a particular locale
often reflects the intended use of the facility by the local sponsor after
filling. CDFs are generally formed by the construction of dikes: upland
facilities typically have earthen dikes; in-lake CDFs typically have stone
dikes. The purpose of a CDF design is to retain as high a percentage of the
sediment particles as practical {basic conclusion of the EMRP),
In terms of wastewater treatment technology, CDFs function as settling basins.
Existing CDFs were designed to retain greater that 99.9% of the sediment
particles disposed. This is quite carparable with the efficiencies of
advanced municipal wastewater treatment facilities.
Itie dredged sediments are placed into the facility either mechanically (by
clamshell and crane or trucks) or hydraulically (by pipeline). Most of the
coarse sediments (sands and gravel) settle rapidly near the point of disposal.
Fine grained sediments (silts and clays) may require more time to settle out.
Water (effluent) is drained or discharged from the CDF during dredged
disposal operations. During non-dredging periods, limited amounts of water
may be released from rainfall runoff or seepage.
Most in-lake facilities have stone dikes constructed with layers of stone of
irereasing size. Itie center of the dike (core) typically contains sand or
gravel. Hie outer layers of the dike have stone with sizes increasing from
several pounds to several tons to protect the facility from wave energy. Most
existing, in-lake CDFs have no liners. The stone dikes are permeable upon
construction. The in-lake CDF has ponded water in hydrostatic equilibrium
with the adjacent harbor, river, or lake.
As dredgings are placed into the CDF, water is moved passively through the
dike. The sand or gravel in the core of the dike functions as a filter and
retains much of the suspended sediments. As the in-lake CDF becomes filled,
portions of the dike become clogged as the sediments are mounded against it.
The stone dike becomes progressively less and less permeable. At seme point,
the stone dike becomes clogged to the stage where water cannot exit as fast as
dredgings are disposed. The water level within the CDF begins to rise. In
order to control the water level within the CDF a variety of release
mechanisms have been used. These include fixed or adjustable overflow weirs
and filter cells.
Many variations on the above design have been employed at existing CDFs. Sane
dikes have liners, including clay, plastic fabrics, and grouted mattresses.
Sane dikes" have steel sheet pile in portions of the design. The design intent
is the sane, to retain the sediment particles.
Table 3 sunmarizes facts about the construction date, anticipated fill date,
and capacity of the CDFs on the Great Lakes. Also summarized are types of
pollutants in the dredged material disposed of in these facilities. Figures 2
and 3 sunmarize the status of filling (% filled) and available capacity (cubic
yards) of the Great Lakes CDFs.
-6-
-------
9, CDF M3MITCKENG
Monitoring procedures at CDFs are as individual as the designs. There is no
single, systematic monitoring program applicable to all facilities. The
monitoring program for a CDF is typically the result of comments and
coordination with state and Federal regulatory agencies. The final monitoring
program may be included in the 401 certification issued by the State.
CDF water quality monitoring is generally conducted during the dredging
operation and consists of monitoring the effluent at the weir overflow or
filter cells, the mixing zone, dredge discharge, and open water sites near the
discharge or around the CDF. Twelve facilities have monitoring wells
installed in the dike walls. The type of chemical analysis conducted on water
quality samples collected has varied, depending on the type and level of
pollutants in the dredged sediments and local or regional water quality
priorities.
Special monitoring studies have been conducted at existing CDFs for a variety
of purposes. Dye tracer tests have been conducted at seven facilities to test
the integrity of liners and dike walls. A demonstration of innovative
dredging and disposal equipment was conducted at the Chicago CDF. Diked
facility #2 at Buffalo, New York, has been used extensively for scientific
investigations on the effects of contaminated dredged materials on flora and
fauna at the site.
10. SUMMARY
The information provided above was intended to give a broad overview on
confined disposal facilities on the Great Lakes. More specific information on
the individual CDFs is provided in the renaming section of this report. Data
sheets on each facility are contained in Appendix A. Location maps, plan
views, typical dike cross sections and other design information is contained
in Appendix B.
For additional information about any CDF, contact the USEFA or the Corps
District office for the appropriate area.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region V
Public Affairs Office
230 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, IL 60604
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Buffalo District
Public Affairs Office
1776 Niagara street
Buffalo, NY 14207-3199
-7-
-------
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Chicago District
Public Affairs Office
230 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, IL 60604-1797
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Detroit District
Public Affairs Office
P.O. Box 1027
Detroit, MI 48231-1027
-8-
-------
TABLE 1. EPA GUIDELINE VALUES FOR HARBOR SEDIMENT CLASSIFICATION
C8
COD
<40,000
40,000-80,000
>80,000
TKN
<1,000
1,000-2,000
>2,000
Oil and Grease
<1,000
1,000-2,000
>2,000
Lead
<40
40-60
>60
Zinc
<90
90-200
>200
Ammonia
<75
75-200
>200
Cyanide
<0.10
0.10-0.25
>0.25
Phosphorus
<420
420-650
>650
Iron
<17,000
17,000-25,000
>25,000
Nickel
<20
20-50
>50
Manganese
<300
300-500
>500
Arsenic
<3
3-8
>8
Cadmium
-
-
>6
Chromium
<25
25-75
>75
Barium
<20
20-60
>60
Copper
<25
25-50
>50
Mercury
-
-
>1
Total PCBs
.
.
>10
source: Guideline for the Pollutional Classification of Great Lakes Harbor
Sediments, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region V, 1977
-9-
-------
TEST
TAME 2. ADDITIONAL CRITERIA PGR HARBOR SEDIMENT CLASSIFICATION
MgfflOO OONeilJSIONS
Elutriate
Qc«taminant Source
1:4 mix of sediment and water,
shake 30 min., settle 60 min.,
filter through 0.45m filter,
analyze filtrate
Determine adjacent land usage,
drainage patterns, effluent
discharge points
Color
Visual Examination
Texture
Size Analysis
Odor
Oil and Grease
Smell
Visual Examination
Chemical Analysis
96-Hour Acute Species of animals such as
Bioassav daphnids or f athead minnows
are exposed to sediment and
water for 96 hours.
Determines ability of sediment to
release toxic substances under aerobic,
near neutral pH conditions
If drainage is from a marshy area and
there are limited or no metals, oil are!
grease and volatile organics, higher
levels of TKN, Ammonia N, ODD may be
natural
Darker sediment is potentially more
contaminated than light-colored sediment
Silts are potentially more contaminated
than coarser sands. Silts are usually
transported out of river mouths through
harbors, while sands are usually
transported by lateral onshore drift
Oanmonly subjective
Sanples shewing visible oil and grease
are commonly hicfhly polluted. If
chemical results (lfcble 1) are marginal,
presence of oil and grease classifies
the sediment as polluted
Depending on the percentage of surviving
species, the sediment can be classified
-------
TABLE 3. SUMMARY DATA FOR CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITIES, U.S. GREAT LAKES
Year
Constructed
BUFFALO DISTRICT
1. Cleveland « 12 1974
2. Cleveland « 14 1979
3. Dike #4 (Buffalo) 1974
4. Erie 1979
5. Huron 1975
6. Lorain 1977
7. Small Boat Harbor 1968
<8uf falo)
8. Times Beach 1972
(Buffalo)
9. Toledo (Facility 4) 1976
10. Toledo (Grassy Is.) 1967
CHICAGO DISTRICT
1. Chicago 1984
2. Michigan City 1978
DETROIT DISTRICT
1. Bayport (Green Bay) 1965
2. Bolles 1977
3. Clinton River 1978
4. Crooked River 1982
5. Dickinson Is. 1976
(Lake St. Clair)
6. Erie Pier (Duluth) 1979
7. Frankfort 1982
8. Grassy Is. (Detroit R.) 1960
9. Harbor Is. (Grand Haven) 1974
10. Harsen's Is.
(Lake St. Clair)
11. Kaukawt in River — -
12. Kenosha 1975
13. Kewaunee 1982
14. Kidney Is. (Green Bay) 1979
15. Manitowoc 1975
16. Milwaukee 1975
Anticipated Capacity
Fill Date X Filled (CU 40)
1979 ' 100 2,760,000
1991 40 6,130,000
1995 40 6,900,000
1993 40 1,600,000
1990 70 2,150,000
1990 70 1,850,000
1972 100 1,500,000
45 1,500,000
1992 65 10,000,000
1978 100 5,000,000
1995 10 1,300,000
1989 80 50,000
1979 100 650,000
1990 25 335,000
98 370,000
1992 20 19,500
1990 48 2,031,000
1993 50 1,100,000
1990 100 30,000
1984 100 4,320,000
1985 97 310,000
30,000
1990 66 750,000
1992 57 500,000
1986 97 1,200,000
1992 61 800,000
1990 44 1,600,000
Approximate
Remaining
Capacity
(CU 40)
0
3,678,000
4,140,000
960,000
645,000
555,000
0
Inact ive
3,500,000
0
1,170,000
10,000
0
251,000
0
15,000
1,015,000
550,000
0
0
0
Inact i ve
Inactive
225,000
200,000
0
280,000
800,000
-CONTAMINANTS
Hetals TKH, AMH. N. COD. P PCBs
X
X
x( Kg)
x x
x x
x x
x
x
X XX
X XX
x(Hg)
x XX
x(Hg) x
x x
x x
x(Hg) x
x xx
x
x(Hg> x
x x
Volatile Contamination
Organics OiI & Grease Ranking
x 2
x 3
xx 3
x
x 2/3
x x 2/3
xx 3
xx 3
x 2
x 2
x 3
x 3
x 3
1
1
3
x 1
x 1
x 3
x x
X XX
X X
x(Hg> x x
x
x x
1
1/2
1
3
1
. 3
-------
TABLE 3. SUMMARr DATA FOR CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITIES, U.S. GREAT LAKES (Contd)
DETROIT DISTRICT (contd)
17. Monroe (Sterling)
18. Monroe (Edison)
19. Poi nte HouiI Ie
20. Port SaniIac
21. Rivervieu (Holland)
22. Saginaw
23. Sebeuaing
24. Verplank (Grand Haven)
25. Whirlpool (St. Joseph)
26. Windmill Is. (Holland)
Approximate
Remaining
Tear Anticipated Capacity Capacity
Constructed Fill Date X Fi11ed (CU 40) (CU 40)
1986 1995 •• 4,200,000
1984 -• 0
1979 1993 38 18,640,000 11,184,000
1979 1983 100 143,300 0
-- 120,000
1978 1990 48 10,000,000 5,000,000
1979 1989 65 84,000 29,000
•••¦ .... .. 134,000 Inactive
100 25,000 0
1977 1988 75 370,000 92,000
-12-
-CONTAMINANTS-
Volatile Contamination
HetaIs TKN. AHM. H. COD. P PCBs Crqani cs Oil & Grease Rank i nq
xxx 3
xx x 3
x(Hg) xx 3
xx 1
x x
xx x 2
x 1
X x 1
X X
X
X
-------
FIGURE 1
LOCATIONS OF CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITIES
U.S. GREAT LAKES
Erie Pier,
Crooked R.
Kowkawlin,
Saginaw
Sebewaing
/ Sanilac
/-J Dickenson
\ / Harsen's
F rankfort
Kewaunei
Harbor
Verplank
Times Beach
— Small Boat
Dike 4
Manitowoc-
Riverview
Windmill
Whirlpool
Clinton
•^Grassy I.
»-Bolles
. ^.Cleveland 12
Huron Lorainl Cleveland 14
le
Chicago—
P. Mouillee
Monroe/
Michigan City
Toledo 4
Island 18
(Sterling)
(Edison)
-------
FIGURE 2
GREAT LAKES CONFINED DISPOSAL FACIl ITIFS
PERCENT FILLED
Erie Pier (2)
Bayport (4)
Kidney I, (4)
Kewaunee (2).
Manitowoc (3)
^Milwaukee (2)
Kenosha (3)
Crooked R. (1)
Saginaw (2)
/Frankfort(4)J
Harbor 1.(4)
I
Sebewaing (2)
Sanilac (4)
, Dickenson
" -Windmill
Whirlpool (4)
Chicago (1)yfp. Mouill ee(1*
Michigan City (4j
Huron
Toledo 4 x ,
Island 18 (4)
Times Beach (^4)
Small Boat (4
Cleveland
Cleveland
Lorain
•Clinton (4)
'Grassy I
¦ Balles(1
LEGEND: % FILLED
(1) 0~40%
41-60%
61-81%
>81%
Note: if site is riut labeled, the dutu was not ovoiloblc.
-------
FIGURE 3
GREAT LAKES CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITIES
APPROXIMATE REMAINING CAPACITY
(CUBIC YARDS)
on
i
Erie Pier (2)
Crooked R. (3)
lin
Saginaw (1
Bayport (4)
Kidney I. (4)
Sebewaing (3)
Sanilac (4)
Dickenson
Frankfort(4)
Kewaunee (3)
Manitowoc (3
Harsen s
Harbor 1.(4)
Verplank (4)
Times Beach (4)
Small Boat (4;
Dike 4 (l"
Milwaukee (2
Kenosha (3
Clinton (4)
Grassy 1.(4
BollesL
Windmill
Whirlpool (4
Erie (2)
Cleveland
Loroinl2) Cleveland
Chicago (1)/fp. Mouillee(l
Michigan City (3)
Huron
Toledo 4 (1
Island 18
Monroe
(Edison)
LEGEND: REMAINING CAPACITY
(103 Cu. Yds.)
(1) >1000
(2) 300-1000
(3) <300
(4) = 0
Note: if site is not labeled, ttie data was not available.
-------
Appendix A
Data Sheets
-------
Buffalo District
-------
Name of CDF: Cleveland Dike #12 Waterway: Lake Erie
City: Cleveland County: Cuyahoga State: OH
Status: Inactive Type of CDF: In lake, adjacent to land
TFrWJTCAr, SPFT^TFTrTVTTfTJS
Dike Design: Rubblemound
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System: None
Effluent Treatment: Natural settling
Capacity {cubic yards): 2,760,000
Area (acres): 56.0
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Lake Erie
Site Diagram: Attached, Cleveland Harbor
Description of Setting: Located 2.7 miles northeast of the mouth of the
Cuyahoga River and about 1.0 miles west of the eastern end of the harbor's
east breakwater, adjacent to sites 9 and 13
Mjacent Land Use: Dike disposal area, marina and municipal light company
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: None
Substrate: Lacustrine sands and clays
REGULATORY ENVTRGM^EJTT
Permits: Information to be provided
Local Sponsor: Cleve 1 and-Cuyahoga County Port Authority
Intended Ultimate Use: Waterfront development
Litigation: None
A-l
-------
Continuation of CDF: Cleveland Dike #12
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year Constructed: 1974 Anticipated Fill Date: 1979
Percent Filled: 100 No. of Dredge Operations: 6
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Hydraulic and mechanical
Modifications/Damage/Repairs: Minor repairs to the structure are done on a
yearly basis such as replacing or resetting slope protection stone
DREDGED INTERIM.
Source of Dredged Material: Cleveland and Rocky River Harbor
History of Placement in CDF: Not available
Contaminants of Concern: Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Copper, Lead, Nickel,
Zinc, Oil & Grease
Source of Contaminants: Industrial and Municipal
MONITORING
Monitoring of Sediment: None
Water Quality Monitoring: Qnergency disposal monitoring study CERG
Locations of Monitor Wells: None
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: Uptake of chlorinated benzenes in earthworms (USFW5)
Dye Tests: None
Other Studies: None
Connents: CERG study analyzed water tenperature, Eh, pH, Conductivity,
Turbidity, Dissolved Oxygen, Ortho Phosphate, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen,
Suspended Solids and Volatile Suspended Solids
A-2
-------
Name of CDF: Cleveland Dike #14 Waterway: Lake Erie
City: Cleveland County: Cuyahoga State: OH
Status: Active Type of CDF: In lake, adjacent to land
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Ruhblemound with sheet pile cutoff wall
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System: Two overflow weirs
Effluent Treatment: Natural settling, granular filter in dike and 2 oil
skinners
Capacity (cubic yards): 6,130,000
Area (acres): 88.0
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Lake Erie
Site Diagram: Attached, Cleveland Harbor
Description of Setting: 4.5 miles east of the mouth of the Cuyahoga River
and about .75 miles east of the end of the harbor's east breakwater
Adjacent Land Use: Gordon Park, marina and residential
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: Special marsh grass added to keep
birds away because of botulism problem
Substrate: Lacustrine sands and clay
REGULATORY H*3VIRCM4ENr
Permits: Information to be provided
Local Sponsor: Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority
Intended Ultimate Use: Recreational and parkland
Litigation: None
A-3
-------
Continuation of CDF: Cleveland Dike #14
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year Constructed: 1979 Anticipated Fill tote: 1991
Percent Filled: 40 No. of Dredge Operations: 7
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Mechanical and hydraulic
Nbdi f ications/Damage/Repai rs: Minor maintenance to stone wall in 1980; in
1982 and 1983 repairs made to pumpout facility
DREDGED MATERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Cleveland and Rocky River Harbor
History of Placement in CDF: Not available
Contaminants of Concern: Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Copper, Lead, Nickel,
Zinc, Oil & Grease
Source of Contaminants: Municipal, industrial and steel mills
fCNITORING
Monitoring of Sediment: Predredging grab sanples taken; specific tests
included tenperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, and conductivity
Water Quality Monitoring: Routine monitoring of water just outside CDF and
in dike walls
Locations of Monitor Wells: 4 in dike walls
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: Study on botulism, uptake of chlorinated benzenes in
earthworms (USFWS)
Dye Tests: None
Other Studies: None
Garments: None at this time
A-4
-------
Name of CDF: Dike #4
City: Lackawanna
Status: Active
Waterway: Buffalo Harbor, Lake Erie
County: Erie State: NY
Type of CDF: In lake, adjacent to land
TECHNICAL SFECIFICA1TCNS
Dike Design: Rubblemound, layered stone and slag
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System: Through dike filter and by weir overflow
Effluent Treatment: Filtered in dike and natural settling
Capacity (cubic yards): 6,900,000
Area (acres): 100.0
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Buffalo Harbor, Lake Erie
Site Diagram: Attached, Buffalo Harbor
Description of Setting: Located outside breakwater at south entrance to
Buffalo Harbor (stony Point) adjacent to Bethlehem Steel property, ties
into existing south entrance arm breakwater
Adjacent Land Use: Bethlehem Steel Company (only coking operations active
at this time) and ship channel
Special Biological Conditions/Activity; None
Substrate: Lacustrine clay and sandy silt
REGULATORY ENyrROtWEUT
Permits: Information to be provided
Local Sponsor: Erie County
Intended Ultimate Use: Wildlife area
Litigation: None
A-5
-------
Continuation of CDF: Dike #4
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year Constructed: 1974 Anticipated Fill Date: 1995
Percent Filled: 40 No. of Dredge Operations: 9
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Hydraulic and mechanical
Modi f icat ions/Damage/Repai rs: None
DREDGED MATERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Buffalo Harbor, Dunkirk Harbor
History of Placement in CDF: Not available
Contaminants of Concern: Arsenic, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Chromium, Mercury,
Cadmium, Grease & Oil, FTVH's
Source of Contaminants: Not available
MONITORING
Monitoring of Sediment: USGS and NYDEC sampled CDF
Water Quality Monitoring: Routine sanpling of water inside and outside CDF
Locations of Monitor Wells: None
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: None
Dye Tests: None
Other Studies: None
Cannents: None at this time
A-6
-------
Name of CDF: Erie
City: Erie
Status: Active
Waterway: Erie Harbor, Lake Erie
County: Erie State: PA
Type of CDF: In lake, adjacent to land
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Ruhblemound of clay and rip-rap, vertical steel sheet piling
installed on each face and capped with concrete
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System: Overflow weir and filtered through dike
Effluent Treatment: Natural settling and filter blanket in dike
Capacity (cubic yards): 1,600,000
Area (acres): 22,0
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Erie Harbor, Lake Erie
Site Diagram: Attached, Erie Harbor
Description of Setting: Located on south side of bay formed by Presque
Isle Penninsula
Adjacent Land Use: Abuts south pier on northern border, filled industrial
site to the west and Gulf Oil tank farm and Inter lake Steel Corp. (coke
plant) to the south
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: None
Substrate: Lacustrine sands and clay
REGULATORY EUVIRCWMENr
Permits: Information to be provided
Local Sponsor: Erie-Western/Pennsylvania Port Authority
Intended Ultimate Use: Industrial development
Litigation: None
A-7
-------
Continuation of CDF: Erie
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year constructed: 1979
Percent Filled: 40
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Hydraulic
Modifications/Damage/Repairs: In 1980
Anticipated Fill Date: 1993
No. of Dredge Operations: 1
repairs were made to pumpout facility
DREDGED f'KTERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Erie Harbor
History of Placanent in CDF: Not available
Contaminants of Concern: Lead, Cadmium, Chromium, copper, Nickel, Zinc,
Phenol, Anmonia Nitrogen
Source of Contaminants: Not available
M3SHT0RING
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dredging grab samples
Water Quality Monitoring: None
Locations of Monitor Wells: None
SP0CIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: 96 hour acute bioassay
Dye Tests: None
Other studies: None
Ccnments: Most of the sediments dredged in Erie Harbor are uncontaminated
by EPA standards artf are dunped in open water
A-8
-------
Name of CDF: Huron
City: Huron
Status: Active
Waterway: Lake Erie
County: Erie State: OH
Type of CDF: In lake, island
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Rubblariound & cellular sheet piling with plastic filter cloth
made with galvanized woven wire backing
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System: Through dike, pumping and overflow weirs
Effluent Treatment: Water allowed to settle for 1 hour before pumping it
back into the lake
Capacity (cubic yards): 2,150,000
Area (acres): 63.0
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Lake Erie
Site Diagram: Attached, Huron Harbor
Description of Setting: Located adjacent to west pier at Huron Harbor at
the mouth of Huron River and Lake Erie
Adjacent Land Use: Marina and industrial
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: Near spawning grounds of fish in
western basin
Substrate: Lacustrine clay over glacial till
REGULATORY HWIRCWIENr
Permits: Information to be provided
Local Sponsor: City of Huron
Intended Ultimate Use: Marina and park
Litigation: None
A-9
-------
Continuation of CDF: Huron
HISTORY OF OFERAHCN
Year Constructed: 1975 Anticipated Fill Date: 1990
Percent Filled: 70 No. of Dredge Operations: 5
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Hydraulic
Modifications/Damage/Repairs: Repairs to pumpout facility in 1980, 1981
and 1983. In 1981 repairs made to overflow weir to prevent damage during
winter
DREDGED MATERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Huron and Vermillion Harbors
History of Placement in CDF: Not available
Contaminants of Concern: Oil & Grease, Phosphorous, Arsenic, Anmonia
Nitrogen, CCD, Zinc, Manganese, Nickel, Chromium, Copper, iron
Source of Contaminants: Effluent from Norwalk Sewage Treatment Plant which
has exceeded Oil & Grease limitations
MJJITDRING
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dredging grab sanple taken
Water Quality Monitoring: Routine monitoring at dike, inside dike and
surrounding water as well as upland
Locations of Monitor Wells: 2 in dike walls, 3 upland
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: 96 hour acute bioassay
Dye Tests: None
Other Studies: None
Conments: None at this time
A-10
-------
City; Lorain
Name of CDF: Lorain Harbor
Waterway; Lake Erie
County; Lorain
State: OH
Status: Active
Type of CDF: In lake, adjacent to breakwater
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Combination rubblanound and steel sheet pile
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System: Overflow weir
Effluent Treatment: Filtercore in dike and natural settling
Capacity (cubic yards): 1,850,000
Area (acres): 58.0
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Lake Erie
Site Diagram: Attached, Lorain Harbor
Description of Setting: South shore of Lake Erie; constructed on the open
lake side of the east breakwater shorearm of Lorain Harbor
Adjacent Land Use: Park, residential area, wastewater treatment plant
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: None
Substrate: Lacustrine clay and sand
REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT
Permits: Information to be provided
Local Sponsor: City of Lorain
Intended Ultimate Use: Small boat harbor and recreation
Litigation: None
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year Constructed: 1977 Anticipated Fill Date: 1990
A-ll
-------
Continuation of CDF: Lorain Harbor
Percent Filled: 70 No, of Dredge Operations: 8
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Hydraulic
Modifications/Damage/Repairs: Repairs made to pumpout facility in 1980
DREDGED IVFffERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Lorain Harbor
History of Placement in CDF: Not available
Contaminants of Concern: Arsenic, Zinc, Cyanide, Phosphorus, M's, Oil &
Grease, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Copper, Iron
Source of Contaminants: Industrial and steel mills
1CNITCWNG
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dredging grab samples taken; specific test
include particle size, specific conductance, pH, dissolved oxygen
Water Quality ftonitoring: Occasional monitoring inside and outside of dike
Locations of Monitor wells: Dike walls (not monitored at present)
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: 96 hour acute bioassay test (daphnids, fathead
minnows), uptake of chlorinated benzenes in earthworms (USFWS)
Dye Tests: None
Other Studies: None
Comments: Monitoring of dike wells shows no migration of contaminants
A-12
-------
Name of CDF: Small Boat Harbor
City; Buffalo
Status: Inactive (1972)
Waterway: Buffalo Harbor, Lake Erie
County: Erie State: NY
Type of CDF: In lake, adjacent to land
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Limestone rip-rap on an earthen and slag core
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System: Semi-permeable dike construction
Effluent Treatment: Natural settling
Capacity {cubic yards): 1,500,000
Area (acres): 33.0
Cap Design: 6 feet of soil and clean construction debris at north end
adjacent to marina
SETTING
Waterway: Lake Erie
Site Diagram: Attached, Buffalo Harbor
Description of Setting: Located at south end of Buffalo Outer Harbor
adjacent to land
Adjacent Land Use: Tift Farm Nature Preserve is located east of the CDF
across New York Route 5; Snail Boat Marina adjacent to north, open harbor
to the south and west
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: South half of CDF is emergent
marsh, trees established in southeast corner
Substrate: Sandy silt and clay
REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT
Permits: Information to be provided
Local Sponsor: Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority (NFm)
Intended Ultimate Use: One-half wildlife area, one-half parking for NFm
Litigation: None
A-13
-------
Continuation of CDF: Small Boat Harbor
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year Constructed: 1968 Anticipated Fill Date: 1972
Percent Filled: 100 No. of Dredge Operations: N/A
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Hydraulic and mechanical
Modifications/Damage/Repairs: In 1976 seme replacement or resetting of
dike armor stone
DREDGED MATERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Buffalo Harbor, Lake Erie
History of Placement in CDF: Not available
Contaminants of Concern: Arsenic, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Chromium, Mercury,
Cadmium, Grease & Oil, PAH's, Aromatic Amines, Chlorobenzenes
Source of Contaminants: Aromatic Amines derived from dye production
MuNITXMNG
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dredging grab sanples taken
Water Quality Monitoring: Occasional monitoring inside CDF
Locations of Monitor Wells: Monitoring wells inside CDF installed by NFTA
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: None
Dye Tests: None
Other studies: None
Conments; Listed as a State of New York "Superfund" site, State listing
#9-15-127, p. 9-281 class 2
A-14
-------
Name of CDF: Times Beach
City; Buffalo
Status: Inact i ve
Waterway: Buffalo Harbor, Lake Erie
County: Erie State: NY
Type of CDF: In water, adjacent to land
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Layered slag and stone rubblemound
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System: Permeable wall dike
Effluent Treatment: Natural settling and filtered through dike
Capacity (cubic yards): 1,500,000
Area (acres): 45.0
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Buffalo Harbor
Site Diagram: Attached, Buffalo Harbor
Description of Setting: Located to the southeast of confluence of Buffalo
River entrance channel and Buffalo CXiter Harbor
Adjacent Land Use: Buffalo Outer Harbor located to west, U.S. Coast Guard
Station to north, Seaway Pier No. 1 Complex to south and Norfolk and
Western Rail to west
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: Locally unique freshwater marsh area
Substrate: Sandy silt
REGULATORY ENVIFOWENr
Permits: Information to be provided
Local Sponsor: City of Buffalo
Intended Ultimate Use: Filling of CDF terminated due to development of a
unique wetland
Litigation: None
A-15
-------
Continuation of CDF: Times Beach
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year Constructed: 1972 Anticipated Fill Date: N/A
Percent Filled: 45 No. of Dredge Operations: 4
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Hydraulic and mechanical
MDd i f icat ions/Damage/Repai rs: None
DREDGED MATERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Buffalo Harbor
History of Placement in CDF: Not available
Contaminants of Concern: Arsenic, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Chromium, Mercury,
Cadmium, Oil & Grease, PAH's, Aromatic Amines, Chlorobenzenes
Source of Contaminants: Aromatic Amines derived from dye production
MMTCKENG
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dredging grab sanples taken
Water Quality Monitoring: Routine monitoring of dike wells and groundwater
at various levels
Locations of Monitor Wells: Three clusters of three in dike
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological studies: Long-term study site for plant and animal
bioaccunulation
Dye Tests: None
Other Studies: None
Garments: Hie State of New York listed this site as a "Superfund" site
(No, 9-15-080, p. 9-215, class 2)
A-16
-------
Name of CDF; Toledo (Facility 4) Waterway: Toledo Harbor, Lake Erie
City: Toledo County: Lucas State: OH
Status: Active Type of CDF: in lake, adjacent to land.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Prepared limestone base with clay dike
Liner Design: Clay core frcm local construction
Dewatering Systan: Weir overflow
Effluent Treatment: Natural settling; oil skiumer available
Capacity (cubic yards): 10,000,000
Area (acres): 242.0
Cap Design: None
SfiTirgc
Waterway: Toledo Harbor, Lake Erie
Site Diagram: Attached, Toledo Harbor
Description of Setting: Located in Maumee Bay, east of the Maumee River
mouth and navigation channel
Adjacent Land Use: Adjacent to existing Toledo-Edison diked diposal area
(fly ash) and the Toledo-Lucas County Port Authority diked disposal area
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: None
Substrate: Sandy clay (80% silt-clay)
REGULATORY EWVHO#1ENr
Permits: Information to be provided
Local Sponsor: Toledo - Lucas County Port Authority
Intended Ultimate Use: Industrial park and port facility
Litigation: None
A-17
-------
Continuation of CDF: Toledo (Facility 4)
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year Constructed: 1976 Anticipated Fill Date: 1992
Percent Filled: 65 No. of Dredge Operations: 9
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Hydraulic
Modi ficat ions/Damage/Repairs: Replacment or resetting of armor stone done
on a yearly basis, pjnpout facilities repaired in 1977, 1982, and 1983.
Inner surface of dikes repaired in 1985
DREDGED MATERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Toledo Harbor
History of Placanent in CDF: Not available
Contaminants of Concern: Cyanide, Arsenic, Copper, Nickel, Iron,
Phosphorus, Zinc, Lead, CCD, Airmenia Nitrogen, Phenols, Phenanthrene,
Anthracene, Acrolein, Acrylonitrile, Fluoranthene, Benzidine, Total PM's
Source of Contaminants: Not available
M3SJITCRIMG
Monitoring of Sediment: None
Water Quality Monitoring: Routine monitoring of weir overflow, standing
water inside CDF, upstream, downstream, adjacent to dike and open water
Locations of Monitor Wfells: None
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: Cadmium uptake in earthworms, FCB uptake in aquatic
bottom species, 96 hour accute bioassay, plant accumulation of heavy metals
and organics
Dye Tests: None
Other Studies: None
Comments: IWo automatic samples on weir are taken daily during operation
A-18
-------
Name of CDF: Toledo (Grassy island) Waterway: Toledo Harbor, Lake Erie
City: Toledo County: Lucas State: OH
Status: Inactive Type of CDF: Island in lake, adjacent to land
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATJCMS
Dike Design: Granular fill (sandy loam)
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System: Overflow weir
Effluent Treatment: Natural settling
Capacity (cubic yards): 5,000,000
Area (acres): 150,0
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Toledo Harbor, Lake Erie
Site Diagram: Attached, Toledo Harbor
Description of Setting: Located in Maumee Bay northwest of the mouth of
the Maumee River
Adjacent Land Use: Bordered on south side by shipping channel, on east,
north and west by shallow waters of inner bay
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: ffone
Substrate: Sandy clay (80% silt-clay)
REGULATORY ENVIRCM®Nr
Permits: Information to be provided
Local Sponsor: Ttoledo-Lucas County Port Authority
Intended Ultimate Use: Wildlife area and to recycle dredge spoil as topsoil
Litigation: None
A-19
-------
Continuation of CDF: Toledo (Grassy Island)
HISTORY OF OFERATTCN
Year Constructed: 1967 Anticipated Fill Date: 0
Percent Filled: 100 No. of Dredge Operations: N/A
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Hydraulic
Modifications/Damage/Repairs: Raising and improvement of the perimeter
dike to increase CDF volume completed three times, dikes armored with
rip-rap to protect them from erosion
DREDGED NKEERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Toledo Harbor
History of Placement in CDF: Not available
Contaminants of Concern: Cyanide, Arsenic, Copper, Nickel, Iron,
Phosphorus, Zinc, Lead, ftnmonia Nitrogen
Source of Contaminants: Not available
ICNITCmiNG
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dredging grab samples taken and recently
sanpled by USACE Buffalo District
Water Quality Monitoring: None
Locations of Monitor Wells: None
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: Cadmium intake by earthworms
Dye Tests: None
Other Studies: None
Garments: Constructed and completely filled prior to facility being
transferred to Buffalo District
A-20
-------
Chicago District
-------
Name of CDF: Chicago Area
Waterway: Lake Michigan, Calumet Harbor
City: Chicago
County: Cook
State: IL
Status: Active
Type of CDF: In lake, adjacent to land
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Stone filled dike with core of prepared limestone
Liner Design: Plastic flexible liner (30 mil) with polyester fabric
reinforcement
Dewatering System: Filter cells
Effluent Treatment: Primary & secondary settling sand/carbon filtration
Capacity (cubic yards): 1,300,000
Area (acres): 42.0
Cap Design: TVo foot clay liner and one foot of topsoil to cover entire
area when site ccnpletely filled
SETTING
Waterway: Lake Michigan, Calumet Harbor
Site Diagram: Attached
Description of Setting: Located along the north side of Iroquois Landing
at the headwaters of the Calumet River
Adjacent Land Use: Port facility and park
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: None
Substrate: Lacustrine sand and clay
REGULATORY EM/TRCNMEM1
Permits: See Attachment 1
Local Sponsor: Chicago Regional Port District and the Chicago Park District
Intended Ultimate Use: Port facility and/or park expansion
Litigation: None
A-21
-------
Continuation of CDF: Chicago Area
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year Constructed: 1984 Anticipated Fill Date: 1995
Percent Filled: 20 No. of Dredge Operations: 3
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Mechanical
Modifications/Damage/Repairs: Liner damaged during construction; fine sand
placed on disposal side of dike; dredged material placed along dike
interior to aid sand blanket
DREDGED f-MERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Calumet River & Harbor, Chicago River & Harbor
History of Placanent in CDF: In 1984 and 1985 100,000 cubic yards added;
70,000 cubic yards added in 1986. During construction southeast side of
CDF used for disposal of unstable sediments
Contaminants of Concern: Mercury, Lead, Arsenic, Copper, Zinc, Manganese,
Chromium, Cyanide, Oil & Grease, PCBs
Source of Contaminants: Steel mills, heavy industry, urban runoff, sewer
overflow, waste treatment plant effluents
M3SHTORING
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dredging bulk analysis (grab & core samples),
standard elutriate, EP toxicity. During dredging weekly grab of material
as disposed for bulk analysis. No post disposal monitoring
Water Quality Monitoring: Continuous water level measurements inside CDF,
surface water quality monitoring of Calumet Harbor & River (5 stations),
filter cell influent & effluent (weekly during disposal operations), and
monitoring wells in and around CDF (monthly, year round)
Locations of Monitor Wells: 6 along dike, 3 in adjacent land
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: Monthly field observations of wildlife at CDF. Fish
and benthos collected and analyzed for FCB body burden
Dye Tests: Conducted during construction to determine liner integrity
Other Studies: Dredge equipment demonstration, including use of submerged
diffuser within CDF; special water quality monitoring inside
Comments: Plastic liner damaged by gravel (taring construction, filter
cloth not used in final design although suggested in EIS
A-22
-------
Name of CDF: Chicago Area
Attachment: 1
Permits: Section 401 Certification by State of Illinois,
IL WPC pt. Nos. 1 982-EA-0325 and 1 987-EA-285 1 , and Illinois
DOT Construction Permit
A-23
-------
Name of CDF: Michigan City
City: Michigan City
County: LaPorte
Waterway: Trail creek
State: IN
Status: inactive
Type of CDF: Upland
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Earthen dikes with stone rip-rap
Liner Design: Natural clay formation under CDF
Dewatering System: Sand filter and drainage pipes
Effluent Treatment: Primary settling and sand filtration
Capacity (cubic yards): 50,000
Area (acres): 3,3
Cap Design: Clay cap with top soil cover
SETTING
Waterway: Trail Creek and MI City Harbor, Lake MI
Site Diagram: Attached
Description of Setting: North side of Trail Creek about 1.5 miles up creek
from the outlet into Lake Michigan
Adjacent Land Use: A park and lagoon which are used for recreational
purposes, Trail Creek, and the Michigan City Sewage Treatment Plant
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: None
Substrate: Silty sand over clay
RBGULAflX3RY E3SIVXFOWENT
Permits: See Attachment 2
Local Sponsor: City of Michigan City
Intended Ultimate Use: Additional park land
Litigation: Citizens are suing over dredging
A-24
-------
continuation of CDF: Michigan City
H2STCRY OF OFERA2TOJ
Year Constructed: 1978 Anticipated Fill Date: 1987
Percent Filled: 100 No. of Dredge Operations: 2
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Hydraulic and mechanical
MDdifications/Damage/Repairs: Filter dike became clogged during first
operation; CDF incompatible with hydraulic dredging; disposal completed
using mechanical dredging and trucking
DREDGED MATERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Trail Creek
History of Placement in CDF: In 1978/9, hydraulic dredging and disposal
followed by mechanical dredging and trucking {35,000 cy). In 1987,
mechanical dredging and trucking (21,000 cy)
Contaminants of Concern: Cyanide, Nickel, Arsenic, Chromium, Phosphorus,
Cadmium, Oil & Grease, Nitrogen (TKN and Arnnonia)
Source of Contaminants: Sewer overflows and wastewater treatment plant
effluent, Waste Inc., NFL site
ICNITORING
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dredging grab and core sanples in
1970/1975/1983/1986/1987, and weekly grab sanples of sediments during
dredging. Borings made in dike after clogging during first operation
Water Quality Monitoring: Surface water sanples from Trail Creek during
dredging and disposal. Groundwater monitoring on a quarterly basis
Locations of Monitor Wells: 3 wells, 1 upgradient, 2 downgradient of CDF
SPECIAL STODIES
Biological Studies: USEWS collected earthworms from CDF for tissue analysis
Dye Tests: None
Other Studies: None
Comments: None at this time
A-25
-------
Name of CDF: Michigan City
At cachmen t 2
Permits; Certification, Section 401 Clean Water Act
State waived
A-26
-------
Detroit District
-------
Name of CDF: Bayport
City: Green Bay
Status: Active
Waterway: Green Bay, Lake Michigan
County: Brown State: WI
Type of CDF: In lake, adjacent to land
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Constructed of on-site material
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System: Weir overflow
Effluent Treatment: Natural settling
Capacity (cubic yards): 5,500,000
Area (acres): 400.0
Cap Design: City of Green Bay plans to cap site
SETTING
Waterway: Green Bay, Lake Michigan
Site Diagram: Attached, Green Bay Harbor
Description of Setting: Located west of the mouth of the Fox River in
Green Bay bounded on the southwest by 1-43
Adjacent Land Use: Wetlands, sanitary landfills and incinerator to the
west on former wetland site, fuel tank farm to southeast
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: Southern Bald Eagle, American
Peregrine Falcon, Double Crested Cormorant nest in the area
Substrate: Clays and silts
REGULATORY EMKIMr
Permits: WPDES
Local Sponsor: City of Green Bay
Intended Ultimate Use: Industrial development, marine terminal facility
Litigation: None
A-27
-------
Continuation of CDF: Bayport
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year Constructed: 1965 Anticipated Fill Date: 1979
Percent Filled: 95 No. of Dredge Operations: 15+
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Mechanical and hydraulic
Modi ficat ions /Damage/Repairs: in 1977 USACE raised the height of the
existing dike from 11 to 14.5 feet
DREDGED MATERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Green Bay Harbor
History of Placement in CDF: North central portion used by Wisconsin
Public Service Corp. for fly ash disposal; 1985-86, 100,000 cu. yd.
deposited in 25 acre site; 1987-88, 250,000 cu. yd. to be placed in west
half
Contaminants of Concern: CCD, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Oil & Grease,
Mercury, Lead, Phosphorus, Arsenic, Chromium, Copper, Cadmium, Cobalt,
Nickel, Cyanide and PCBs
Source of Contaminants: Not available
MONITORING
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dredging core samples analyzed for Total
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Metals, Organics, and PCBs
Water Quality Monitoring: None
Locations of Monitor Wfells: None
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: None
Dye Tests: None
Other Studies: None
Cortments: None at this time
A-28
-------
Name of CDF: Bolies Harbor
City; Bolies
Status: Active
Waterway: Lake Erie
county; Mbnroe State: HI
Type of CDF: In lake, adjacent to land
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Prepared limestone with clay core, coverstone, steel sheet
pile revetments, nibblemound jetty and plastic filter cloth
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System: Weir overflow
Effluent Treatment: Natural settling and oil skimmer
Capacity {cubic yards): 335,000
Area (acres): 25.0
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Lake Erie
Site Diagram: Attached, Bolies Harbor
Description of Setting: Located on flat coastal lands of Lake Erie,
situated at the mouth of La Plaisence Creek
Adjacent Land Use: Utility company (Enrico Fermi II nuclear power plant),
marina, residential
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: None
Substrate: Lacustrine sand and clay
REGULATORY ENVHOMENT
Permits: Information to be provided
Local Sponsor: Michigan Department of Natural Resources
intended Ultimate Use: Marina expansion
Litigation: None
A-29
-------
Continuation of CDF: Bolles Harbor
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year Constructed: 1978 Anticipated Fill Date: 1990
Percent Filled: 25 No. of Dredge Operations: 2
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Hydraulic
Modifications/Damage/Repairs: Replaced washed out cover stone, stone
rip-rap placed inside where needed
DREDGED MATERIAL
source of Dredged Material: Bolles Harbor, La Plaisance Creek to deepwater
in Lake Erie
History of Placement in CDF: Not available
Contaminants of Concern: Arsenic, Copper, Iron, Armenia Nitrogen, Total
Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Source of Contaminants: Septic tanks, agricultural runoff
ranTORiNG
Monitoring of Sediment: Fire-dredging core sanples taken, analyzed for
Nutrients, Phosphorus, Metals, Organics
Water Quality Monitoring: None
Locations of Monitor Wells: None
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological studies: None
Dye Tests: None
Other Studies; None
Comments: None at this time
A-30
-------
Name of CDF: Clinton River
Waterway: Clinton River
City: rtount Clemens
County: Macomb
State: MI
Status: Inacti ve
Type of CDF: In water, adjacent to breakwater
TECHNICAL SFECIFICA3TCINFS
Dike Design: Constructed frcm material dredged from navigation channel of
Clinton River, also includes rip-rap
Liner Design: On-site Clay
Dewatering Systan: None
Effluent Treatment: Natural settling, oil skinner
Capacity (cubic yards): 370,000
Area (acres): 30.0
Cap Design: Clay
SETTING
Waterway: Clinton River
Site Diagram: Attached, Clinton River
Description of Setting: At mouth of Clinton River
Adjacent Land Use: Offshore, attached to south breakwater
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: None
Substrate: Lacustrine clay and silt
RB3ULA1DRY E3WIKCNMENT
Permits: Information to be provided
Local Sponsor: State of Michigan
Intended Ultimate Use: Public access site and MWR field station
Litigation: None
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year Constructed: 1978 Anticipated Fill Date: N/A
A-31
-------
Continuation of CDF: Clinton River
Percent Filled: 98 No. of Dredge Operations: 2
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Mechanical
Modi f icat ions/Damage/Repai rs: None
DREDGED f^TERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Lower portion of Clinton River, eroded banks
and agricultural soil erosion
History of Placement in CDF: Not available
Contaminants of Concern: Not available
Source of Contaminants: Red Run, a discharge canal carrying heavy
industrial waste loading enters the Clinton River above Mt. Clemens
MJNJITORING
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dredging core samples analyzed for Total
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Anmonia Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Metals, Organics
Water Quality Monitoring: None
Locations of Monitor Wells: None
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: None
Dye Tests: None
Other Studies: NOne
Continents: None at this time
A-32
-------
Name of CDF: Dickinson Island Waterway: Channels in Lake St. Clair
City: Clay T\ownship County: St. Clair State: MI
Status: Active Type of CDF: On island (two sites)
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Earthen clay dikes
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System: Weir overflow with oil skinnier
Effluent Treatment: Natural settling
Capacity (cubic yards): 2,031,000
Area (acres): 174.0
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Lake St. Clair (LSC)
Site Diagram: Attached, Channels in LSC
Description of Setting: North end of Dickenson Island, adjacent to north
channel
Adjacent Land Use: Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife area
adjacent to the south
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: Acts as a fish spawning area,
which consists of a wet prairie habitat that contains rare plants
Substrate: Silty sand
REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT
Permits: Information to be provided
Local Sponsor: No sponsor required, to be acquired by the State of Michigan
Intended Ultimate Use: Will be incorporated into St. Clair Flats Wildlife
Area
Litigation: None
A-33
-------
Continuation of CDF: Dickinson Island
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year Constructed: 1976 Anticipated Fill Date: 1990
Percent Filled: 48 No. of Dredge Operations: 10
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Hydraulic and mechanical
Modifications/Damage/Repairs: None
DREDGED MATERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Channels in Lake St. Clair
History of Placement in CDF: Not available
Contaminants of Concern: Antnonia Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Lead,
Arsenic, Magnesium, Mercury
Source of Contaminants: Not available
mmoRiNG
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dredging core samples analyzed for Total
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Metals, Organics
Water Quality Monitoring: Wells monitored, dredge discharge, weir
overflow, mixing zone, upstream, downstream
Locations of Monitor Wells: Wells in dike perimeter
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: None
Dye Tests: None
Other Studies: None
Corments: None at this time
A-34
-------
Name of CDF: Erie Pier
City: Duluth
Status: Active
Waterway: Duluth-Superior Harbor, Lake Superior
County: St. Louis State: MJ
Type of CDF: In lake adjacent to land
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Constructed of on site material and dredged material with
stone rip-rap with a 300 foot steel bulkhead on southeast side
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System: None
Effluent Treatment: None, no outlet for effluent
capacity (cubic yards): 1,100,000
Area (acres): 82.0
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Duluth-Superior Harbor, Lake Superior
Site Diagram: Attached, Duluth-Superior
Description of Setting: Located in west Duluth at about 45th Avenue W. at
Erie Pier
Adjacent Land Use: Bounded to northwest by Burlington Northern Railyard,
marsh and shallow open water on northeast, and St. Louis River to southeast
and southwest
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: None
Substrate: Soft organic bottom sediments
REGULATORY ENVIRCtWENr
Permits: Information to be provided
Local Sponsor: City of Duluth and Seaway Port Authority of IXiluth
Intended Ultimate Use: Recreational
Litigation: None
A-35
-------
Continuation of CDF: Erie Pier
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year Constmeted: 1979
Percent Filled: 65
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Mechanical
Modi ficat i ons/Damage/Repairs: None
Anticipated Fill Date: 1993
No. of Dredge Operations: 10+
DREDGED MATERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Duluth-Superior Harbor
History of Placement in CDF: Not available
Contaminants of Concern: Oil & Grease, Phosphorus, Arsenic, Manganese,
Lead, Zinc, Amroiia Nitrogen
Source of Contaminants: Not available
MMTCRING
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dredging core sanples analyzed for Total
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Metals, Organics
Water Quality Monitoring: None
Locations of Monitor Wells: None
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: None
Dye Tests: None
Other Studies: None
Corrments: None at this time
A-36
-------
Name of CDF; Frankfort Harbor
City: Crystal Lake Ttwnship
Status: Active
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: No dikes required
Lirter Design: None
Dewatering System: None
Effluent Treatment: None
Capacity (cubic yards): 70,000
Area (acres): 80,0
Cap Design: Site to be seeded when completed
SETTING
Waterway: Lake Michigan
Site Diagram: Attached
Description of Setting: Fife Lake State Resort located 15 miles southeast
of Frankfort off Hwy M-115
Adjacent Land Use: Cherry orchards
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: None
Substrate: Sand and gravel
REGULATORY EWHOMENT
Permits: Information to be provided
Local Sponsor: State of Michigan
Intended Ultimate Use: Cherry orchard
Litigation: None
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year Constructed: N/A Anticipated Fill Date: N/A
Waterway: Lake Michigan
County: Benzie State: MI
Type of CDF: Upland
A-37
-------
Continuation of CDF; Frankfort Harbor
Percent Filled: 100 No. of Dredge Operations: l
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Mechanical
Modifications/Damage/Repairs: None
DREDGED IMPERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Frankfort Harbor
History of Placement in CDF: Not used to date
Contaminants of Concern: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Ammonia Nitrogen,
Manganese, Barium, Phosphorus, Oil & Grease
Source of Contaminants: Agricultural runoff
MMETORjENG
Monitoring of Sediment: None
Water Quality Monitoring: None
Locations of Monitor Wells: None
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: None
Dye Tests: None
Other Studies: None
Comments: This site was selected by the contractor
A-38
-------
Name of CDF: Grassy Island
City: Wyandotte
Status: Inactive
TECHNICAL SFECIFICM1CNS
Dike Design: Sand and clay dikes
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System: Weir overflow
Effluent Treatment: Natural settling
Capacity (cubic yards): 1,900,000
Area (acres): 80.0
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Detroit River
Site Diagram: Attached, Detroit River
Description of Setting: East of city of Wyandotte in Detroit River
abutting U.S. border with Ontario Canada
Adjacent Land Use: Wyandotte National Wildlife Refuge
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: Used by wintering ducks including
scaup, redheads, canvasbacks, mergansers
Substrate: Glacial sandy till and soil
REGULATORY EMVUOtffM'
Permits: Information to be provided
Local Sponsor: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service owns land; no sponsor
Intended Ultimate Use: Wildlife Area
Litigation: None
Waterway: Detroit River
County: Wayne State: MI
Type of CDF: CDF island adjacent to nav.
A-39
-------
Continuation of CDF: Grassy Island
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year Constructed: I960 Anticipated Fill Date: 1984
Percent Filled: 100 No. of Dredge Operations: 9+
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Hydraulic and mechanical
Modifications/Damage/Repairs: Dike raised in 1960's, capacity expanded in
1971, currently planning stone rip-rap and filter cloth on outer face
DREDGED MATERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Detroit and Rouge Rivers
History of Placement in CDF: Disposal Site for Rouge River sediments
dredged annually from 1965 to 1984
Contaminants of Concern: Oil & Grease, Copper, Cadmium, Chromium, Mercury,
Lead, Armenia Nitrogen, and Zinc
Source of Contaminants: Heavy industry including steel and automobile
manufacture
M2JIT0RING
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dreging core samples analyzed for Total
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Anmonia Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Metals, Organics
Water Quality Monitoring: Dredge discharge, weir overflow, mixing zone,
upstream, downstream
Locations of Monitor Wells: None
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: Chlorinated benzene uptake in earthworms (USFWS)
Dye Tests: None
Other Studies: None
Conments: None at this time
A-40
-------
Name of CDF: Harbor Island
City: Grand Haven
Status: Active
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Earthen clay berm
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System: Weir overflow
Effluent Treatment: Natural settling and oil skiirmer
Capacity (cubic yards): 310,000
Area (acres): 36,0
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Grand Haven Harbor, Lake Michigan
Site Diagram: Attached, Grand Haven Harbor
Description of Setting: An existing land fill area on Harbor Island
Adjacent Land Use: Generating plant, Shell Oil tank farm, marshland
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: None
Substrate: Sandy till
REGULATORY ENVTEOMEHT
Permits: Information to be provided
Local Sponsor: State of Michigan
Intended Ultimate Use: Public use
Litigation: None
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year constructed: 1974 Anticipated Fill Date: 1985
Waterway: Grand Haven Harbor, Lake Michigan
County: Ottawa State: MI
Type of CDF: Upland, on island in Grand River
A-41
-------
Continuation of CDF: Harbor Island
Percent Filled: 97 No. of Dredge Operations: 10
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Hydraulic arid mechanical
Modifications/Damage/Repairs: Raised exterior on dike
DREDGED MATERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Grand Haven Harbor
History of Placement in CDF: Dredged material placed annually from 1978
through 1986
Contaminants of Concern: Arsenic, Chromium, Copper, Lead, Nickel, Zinc,
Aimcnia Nitrogen
Source of Contaminants: Untreated or partially treated domestic and
industrial waste, agricultural and urban runoff
fCMTQRING
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dredging core sanples analyzed for Total
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Ammonia Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Metals, Qrganics
Water Quality Monitoring: Routine monitoring of dredge discharge, weir
overflow, mixing zone, upstream and downstream. Adjacent waterway
monitored by the EPA,
Locations of Monitor Wells: None
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: None
Dye Tests: None
Other studies: None
Garments: None at this time
A-42
-------
Name of CDF: Harsen's Island
City; Algonac
Status: Inactive
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Clay dikes
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System: Weir overflow
Effluent Treatment: Natural settling
Capacity (cubic yards): 100,000
Area (acres): 17,2
Cap Design: Will be restored to former soil level arid revegetated by State
of Michigan
SETTING
Waterway: St. Clair River
Site Diagram: Attached, Channels in LSC
Description of Setting: Located on Harsen's Island at the mouth of the St.
Clair River at the Worth end of Lake St. Clair (LSC). The northwest margin
of the island is near the middle channel of St. Clair Flats Wildlife Area
Adjacent Land Use: Wildlife habitat, Mid Channel Golf Club to the north,
marsh to the south, middle channel to the west
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: Acts as a major migration
stop-over point for swans, ducks, coots, rails, jacksnipe and blue heron
Substrate: Sandy loam
REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT
Permits: Information to be provided
Local Sponsor: State of Michigan
Intended Ultimate Use: Revegetated upland nesting habitat for waterfowl
Litigation: None
Waterway: St. Clair River
County: St. Clair State: MI
Type of CDF: Upland
A-43
-------
Continuation of CDF: Harsen's Island
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year constructed; 1975 Anticipated Fill Date: N/A
Percent Filled: 100 No. of Dredge Operations: 4
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Hydraulic and mechanical
Modifications/Damage/Repairs: None
DREDGED mTERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Navigation channel in the St. Clair River
History of Placement in CDF: Last used in 1980, sand from the site will be
used to repair dikes along Muscamoot Bay shoreline
Contaminants of Concern: Not available
Source of Contaminants: Not available
MUIT0RIM5
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dredging core sanples analyzed for Total
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Ammonia Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Metals
Water Quality Monitoring: None
Locations of Monitor Wells: None
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: None
Dye Tests: None
Other Studies: None
Garments: None at this time
A-44
-------
Name of CDF: Inland Rte-Crooked Riv Waterway: Crooked River
City: Brutus County: Qmret State: MI
Status: Active Type of CDF: Upland
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Earthen dike using on site materials
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System: None
Effluent Treatment: None
Capacity (cubic yards): 19,500
Area (acres): 9.0
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Crooked River
Site Diagram: Attached, Inland Route
Description of Setting: North of Crooked River near outlet into Burt Lake,
open fields in Hardwood State Forest operated by Michigan Dept. of Natural
Resources
Adjacent Land Use: Residential and recreational
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: None
Substrate: Sandy soil
REGULATORY EMOTCNMENT
Permits: Information to be provided
Local Sponsor: State of Michigan
Intended Ultimate Use: N/A
Litigation: None
A-45
-------
Continuation of CDF; Inland Rte-Crooked Riv
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year Constructed: 1982 Anticipated Fill Date: 1992
Percent Filled: 32 No. of Dredge Operations: 1
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Mechanical
MDdifications/Damage/Repairs: None
DREDGED MATERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Crooked River navigational channel
History of Placement in CDF: 9 inches inches of dredged material initially
deposited and seeded; 9,500 cu. yds. to be added in 5 years and 5,000 cu.
yds. to be added in 10 years
Contaminants of Concern: CCD, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Lead, Barium
Source of Contaminants: Agricultural runoff
M2MIT0RING
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dredging core samples analyzed for Total
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Anmonia Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Metals, Organics
Water Quality Monitoring: None
Locations of Monitor Wells: None
CDtTTTAT OTfTTYTITC
Oi tlA—i-ALj b iuDlLu
Biological Studies: None
Dye Tests: None
Other Studies: None
Ccstments: None at this time
A-46
-------
Name of CDF: Kawkawlin River
City: Kawkawlin
Status: Inactive
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Clay and sand berm
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System: Weir overflow
Effluent Treatment: Natural settling
Capacity (cubic yards); N/A
Area (acres): N/A
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Kawkawlin River, Lake Michigan
Site Diagram: Attached, Saginaw River
Description of Setting: East bank of Kawkawlin River near mouth at Saginaw
Bay
Adjacent Land Use: N/A
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: None
Substrate: Sandy loam
REGULATORY HWTRCNMENT
Permits: Information to be provided
Local Sponsor: Bay County, MI
Intended Ultimate Use: N/A
Litigation: None
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year Constructed: N/A Anticipated Fill Date: N/A
Waterway: Kawkawlin River, Lake Michigan
County: Bay State: MI
Type of CDF: Upland
A-47
-------
Continuation of CDF: Kawkawlin River
Percent Filled: 100 No. of Dredge Operations: l
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Hydraulic
Modi f icat ions/Damage/Repai rs: None
DREDGED MATERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Mouth of Kawkawlin River
History of Placement in CDF: Not available
Contaminants of concern: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Ammonia Nitrogen,
Arsenic, Zinc
Source of Contaminants: Not available
ronTORiNG
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dredging core sanples taken, specific tests
include PCB Aroclor, TOC, Particle size, Density
Water friality Monitoring: Routine monitoring at dredge discharge, weir
overflow, mixing zone, upstream and downstream
Locations of Monitor Wells: None
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: None
Dye Tests: None
Other Studies: None
Conments: None at this time
A-48
-------
Name of CDF: Kenosha
City: Kenosha
Status: Active
Waterway: Kenosha Harbor, Lake Michigan
County: Kenosha State; WI
Type of CDF: In water, adjacent to land
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Rubblemound construction with sheet pile cutoff wall and
graded filter core
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System: Through dike core and filter cell
Effluent Treatment: Natural settling and filtration through dike and
filter cell
Capacity (cubic yards): 750,000
Area (acres): 32.0
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Kenosha Harbor, Lake Michigan
Site Diagram: Attached, Kenosha Harbor
Description of Setting: In Lake Michigan adjacent to shore, south of mouth
of Pike Creek
Adjacent Land Use: Simmons Island Park, Kenosha Harbor, American Motors
Corporation, Morelli Export Company and Wolfenbuttel Park
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: None
Substrate: Lacustrine clay and sand
REGULATCRY ENVnOMEM1
Permits: WPDES
Local Sponsor: City of Kenosha
Intended Ultimate Use: To be developed as a public recreation area
Litigation: None
A-49
-------
Continuation of CDF: Kenosha
HISTORY OF OFERATICN
Year Constructed: 1975 Anticipated Fill Date: 1990
Percent Filled: 66 No. of Dredge Operations: 6
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Mechanical and hydraulic
MDdifications/Damage/Repairs: Leaks repaired in 1984. In 1986 prepared
limestone placed on leaking sections of dike
raEDGED MATERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Racine and Kenosha Harbors
History of Placement in CDF: Not available
Contaminants of Concern: COD, Oil & Grease, Armtcnia Nitrogen, Tbtal
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Lead, Manganese and Zinc
Source of Contaminants: Not available
JYENITQRING
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dredging core samples analyzed for Total
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Aimonia Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Metals, Organics
Water Quality Monitoring: Dredge discharge, inside dike near filter cells,
mixing zone, open water, 3 lake sites adjacent to wells, 3 dike wells
Locations of Monitor Wells: 3 in dike
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: None
Dye Tests: Integrity test 1984
Other studies: None
Garments: Several areas of high permeability noted in 1984 dye test
A-50
-------
Name of CDF: Kewaunee
City: Kewaunee
Status: Active
Waterway: Kewaunee Harbor, Lake Michigan
County: Kewaunee State: WI
Type of CDF: In lake, adjacent to land
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Prepared limestone core with cover stone and a filter
discharge cell, rip-rap for wave protection
Liner Design: None
Dewatering Systan: Through dike core and four filter cells
Effluent Treatment: Natural settling and filtration through filter cells
Capacity (cubic yards): 500,000
Area (acres): 28.0
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Kewaunee Harbor, Lake Michigan
Site Diagram: Attached, Kewaunee Harbor
Description of Setting: Located on Lake Michigan adjacent to shore and
breakwater, north of Kewaunee River mouth
Adjacent Land Use: Agricultural and open land
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: None
Substrate: Sandy silt
REGULATORY EJWnOWENT
Permits: WPDES
Local Sponsor: City of Kewaunee
Intended Ultimate Use: Recreational facility
Litigation: None
A-51
-------
Continuation of CDF: Kewaunee
HISTORY OF OFERATTCN
Year Constructed: 1982 Anticipated Fill Date: 1992
Percent Filled: 57 No. of Dredge Operations: 4
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Mechanical and hydraulic
Modifications/Damage/Repairs: Sand and clay placed in leak areas in 1984
DREDGED MATERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Kewaunee Harbor
History of Placement in CDF: Not available
Contaminants of Concern: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Anronia Nitrogen
Source of Contaminants: Agricultural runoff
M3NHT0RING
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dredging core sarrples analyzed for Total
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Armenia Nitrogen, Ftosphorus, Metals, Organics
Water Quality Monitoring: Three wells in dike monitored, dredge discharge,
mixing zone, two open water sites, one inside CDF near filter cell
Locations of Monitor Wells: 3 in dike, 1 in filter cell
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: Chlorinated benzene uptake in earthworms (USFWS)
Dye Tests: Integrity test conducted in May 1985
Other studies: None
Comments: May 1985 dye test showed that seepage occurred as designed
except at two spots
A-52
-------
Name of CDF: Kidney Island
City: Green Bay
Status: Active
Waterway: Green Bay Harbor, Lake Michigan
County: Door State: WI
lype of CDF: In water, island
TECHNICAL SPBCIFICAndSfS
Dike Design: Rubblemound with steel sheet pile cutoff wall and filterstone
core
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System: Through core and filter cell discharge
Effluent Treatment: Natural settling and filtration
Capacity (cubic yards): 1,200,000
Area (acres): 60.0
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Green Bay Harbor, Lake Michigan
Site Diagram: Attached, Green Bay Harbor
Description of Setting: Kidney-shaped island in Green Bay about 800 feet
offshore and immediately northwest of Bay Beach Park
Adjacent Land Use: Green Bay Harbor
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: None
Substrate: Lacustrine sandy silt
RB3ULMORY HMVUOMENT
Permits: WPDES
Local Sponsor: City of Green Bay
Intended Ultimate Use: Wildlife habitat
Litigation: Litigation involving proposed expansion
A-53
-------
continuation of CDF; Kidney Island
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year Constructed: 1979 Anticipated Fill Date; 1986
Percent Filled: 97 No, of Dredge Operations: 12
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Hydraulic and mechanical
Modifications/Damage/Repairs: None
DREDGED I^MHRXAL
Source of Dredged Material: Fox River and Grassy Island Channels
History of Placement in CDF: Not available
Contaminants of Concern: Total Volatile Solids, COD, Oil & Grease,
Cyanide, Phosphorus, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Aitwonia Nitrogen, Copper,
Lead, Mercury, Zinc, Arsenic, Chromium, Nickel, Tbtal PCB's
Source of Contaminants: Not available
M3CCT3RING
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dredging core samples analyzed for Total
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Armenia Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Metals, Organics
Water Quality Monitoring: Routine monitoring at dredge discharge, standing
water inside CDF near filter cells, wells in dike, mixing zone, open water
Locations of Monitor Wells: TV® wells in dike, one well in filter cell
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: Bird monitoring (FWS) and plant survey (IM3B)
Dye Tests: None
Other Studies: None
Conments: None at this time
A-54
-------
Name of CDF: Manitowoc Harbor
City; Manitowoc
Status: Active
Waterway; Lake Michigan
County; Manitowoc State: WI
Type of CDF: In water
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Rubblenound with steel sheet pile cutoff wall and filter
stone core covered by filtereloth
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System; Through core and filter cell discharge
Effluent Treatment: Natural settling, filtration
Capacity (cubic yards): 800,000
Area (acres); 24,0
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Lake Michigan
Site Diagram: Attached, Manitowoc Harbor
Description of Setting: Located immediately north of the north breakwater
at Manitowoc Harbor at the mouth of Manitowoc River
Adjacent Land Use: Manitowoc Harbor, Small Boat Harbor
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: None
Substrate: Lacustrine clay and sand
REGULATORY EWVXRO^EOT
Permits: WPDES
Local Sponsor: City of Manitowoc
Intended Ultimate Use: Marina and lakefront park
Litigation: None
A-55
-------
Continuation of CDF: Manitowoc Harbor
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year Constructed: 1975 Anticipated Fill Date: 1992
Percent Filled: 61 No, of Dredge Operations: 8
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Mechanical and hydraulic
MDdifications/Damage/Repairs: Leaks sealed
DREDGED MATERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Manitowoc and "IV/o Rivers Harbors
History of Placanent in CDF: 600,000 cu. yds. from Manitowoc, 200,000 cu.
yds. from IV/o Rivers
Contaminants of Concern: COD, Armenia Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Source of Contaminants: Not available
MONITORING
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dredging core sanples analyzed for Total
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Armenia Nitrogen, Etiosphorus, Metals, Organics
Water Quality Monitoring: Routine monitoring of standing water inside CDF
near filter cells, wells in dike walls, mixing zone, open water
Locations of Monitor Wells: Two wells in dike wall, one in filter cell
SPECIAL STODIES
Biological Studies: None
Dye Tests: Integrity test conducted in 1984
Other Studies: None
Conraents: None at this time
A-56
-------
Name of CDF: Milwaukee
City: Milwaukee
Status: Active
TECHNICAL SPDCIFICWTCNS
Dike Design: Sand filter with limestone core and coverstone on granular
fill; south dike steel sheet pile bulkhead
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System: Through dike core and filter cell discharge
Effluent Treatment: Natural settling
Capacity (cubic yards): 1,600,000
Area (acres): 44,0
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Milwaukee Harbor, Lake Michigan
Site Diagram: Attached, Milwaukee Harbor
Description of Setting: At the south end of Milwaukee Harbor
Adjacent Land Use: Milwaukee Harbor to the north and east, petroleum tank
farms to the west, flushing tunnel intake to the south
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: None
Substrate: Lacustrine sands and clays
REGULATORY ENVTRONMENT
Permits: WFDES
Local Sponsor: City of Milwaukee
Intended Ultimate Use: None
Litigation: None
Waterway: Milwaukee Harbor, Lake Michigan
County: Milwaukee State: WI
Type of CDF: In lake, adjacent to land
A-57
-------
Continuation of CDF: Milwaukee
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year Constructed: 1975 Anticipated Fill Date: 1990
Percent Filled: 44 No, of Dredge Operations: 9+
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Mechanical and hydraulic
ffcdificat ions/Damage/Repairs: Filter cloth damaged by covering it with
concrete
DREDGED MATERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Milwaukee and Port Washington harbors
History of Placement in CDF: Not available
Contaminants of Concern: Arsenic, Lead, Cadmium, Copper, Chromium, Zinc,
Oil & Grease, Armenia Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Cyanide,
Phosphorus, COD
Source of Contaminants: Not available
MMI10RIN3
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dredging core samples analyzed for Total
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Antnonia Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Metals, Organics
Water Quality Monitoring: Wells monitored
Locations of Monitor Wells: In dike, one in filter cell
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: Chlorinated benzene i^Jtake in earthworms (USFWS)
Dye Tests: Integrity test conducted in 1984
Other studies: None
Caiments: Ifte 1984 dye test showed a 90% uniform seepage through dike
walls and filter cells
A-58
-------
Name of CDF; Monroe (Edison)
City: Monroe
Status: Inactive
Waterway: Monroe Harbor, Lake Erie
County: Monroe State: MI
Type of CDF: Upland
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Pre-existing containment facility on Detroit Edison property,
earthen berms with clay on filled side
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System: Weir overflow
Effluent Treatment: Natural settling
Capacity (cubic yards): N/A
Area (acres): 43.0
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Lake Erie
Site Diagram: Attached, Monroe Harbor
Description of Setting: Site located to south of Raisin River on shore of
Lake Erie
Adjacent Land Use: Landfill and fly ash disposal sites, Detroit Edison
coal fired plant, Consolidated Paper Co. mill, Ford Motor Co., IMion Camp
paper mill
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: Habitat for the American Lotus
(Water Lily), an endangered species in Michigan
Substrate: Sandy silt
REGULATORY ENVHOMNT
Permits: Information to be provided
Local Sponsor: Not applicable—private site
Intended Ultimate Use: Detroit Edison
Litigation: None
A-59
-------
Continuation of CDF: Monroe (Edison)
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year Constructed: N/A Anticipated Fill Date: 1984
Percent Filled: 100 No. of Dredge Operations: 8
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Hydraulic and mechanical
Modi f icat ions/Damage/Repairs: None
DREDGED mTERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Monroe Harbor and Channel
History of Placement in CDF: Not available
Contaminants of Concern: COD, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Armenia Nitrogen,
Oil & Grease, Lead, Zinc, Phosphorus, Manganese, Nickel, Arsenic, Copper,
Cadmium, Chromium, Magnesium
Source of Contaminants: Paper mills, shipping, seepage from ash pits
MONITORING
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre--dredging core samples analyzed for Total
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Anmonia Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Metals, Organics
Water Quality Monitoring: Dredge discharge, Edison CDF discharge, four
sites in lagoon, Edison Lagoon Weir
Locations of Monitor Wells: None
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: None
Dye Tests: None
Other studies: None
Comnents: The USAGE dredged this site under contract for Detroit Edison;
this is not a USACE-managed CDF
A-60
-------
Name of CDF: Monroe (Sterling Park) Waterway: Monroe Harbor, Lake Erie
City: Monroe County: Monroe State: Mr
Status: Active Type of CDF: In lake, adjacent to land
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Prepared limestone core with grouted mattress cover on fill
side and stone rip-rap on lake side
Liner Design: Two feet of bentonite and granular fill
Dewatering System: Weir overflow and filter cell discharge
Effluent Treatment: Natural settling and filtration
Capacity (cubic yards): 4,200,000
Area (acres): 89.0
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Monroe Harbor, Lake Michigan
Site Diagram: Attached, Monroe Harbor
Description of Setting: North end of Sterling State Park along shoreline
of intermittent marshes
Adjacent Land Use: Sterling State Park to the south and west, Lake Erie to
the east, a river to the north
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: None
Substrate: Sand and silt
REGULATORY ENVIRCM-lENr
Permits: Information to be provided
Local Sponsor: State of Michigan
Intended Ultimate Use: Nature and wildlife area
Litigation: None
A-61
-------
continuation of CDF: Monroe (Sterling Park)
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year Constructed: 1986
Percent Filled: 0
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Hydraulic
Modifications/Damage/Repairs: Plan to
cell #1
Anticipated Fill Date: 1995
No. of Dredge Operations: 2
repair cover stone displaced from
DREDGED MATERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Monroe Harbor
History of Placement in CDF: Dredged material placed annually
Contaminants of Concern: Copper, Cyanide, Lead, Manganese, Nickel, Zinc,
Anmonia Nitrogen
Source of Contaminants: Not Available
MONITORING
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dreging core samples analyzed for Total
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Annonia Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Metals, Organics
Water Quality Monitoring: None
Locations of Monitor Wells: None
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: None
Dye Tests: Integrity test of cell # 2 in 1985
Other Studies: Leakage from cell # 1 monitored in 1985
Corments: None at this time
A-62
-------
Name of CDF: Pointe Mouillee Waterway: Lake Erie
City: Rockwood County: Monroe State: MI
Status: Active Type of CDF: In lake, Island
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Prepared limestone and/or clay core and cover stone, consists
of five cells
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System: Weir overflow
Effluent Treatment: Natural settling
Capacity (cubic yards): 18,640,000
Area (acres): 700.0
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Lake Erie
Site Diagram: Attached, Detroit River
Description of Setting: Barrier island off flooded wetlands at mouth of
Huron River
Adjacent Land Use: Pointe Mouillee Game Area
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: Contamination of fish and wildlife
from Detroit River is documented
Substrate: Sandy silt, organic humus
REGULATORY ENVTRdSMNT
Permits: Information to be provided
Local Sponsor: State of Michigan
Intended Ultimate Use: Hunting, fishing and marsh reclamation
Litigation: None
A-63
-------
Continuation of CDF: Rointe Mouillee
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year Constructed; 1979 Anticipated Fill Date: 1993
Percent Filled: 38 No. of Dredge Operations: 20+
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Hydraulic and mechanical
Modifications/Damage/Repairs: Interior stone repaired, repair of inner
dike adjacent to State Game Area with clay backing
DREDGED WffiERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Detroit and Rouge Rivers
History of Placement in CDF: Detroit River dredge spoils placed in cells
1,2,5; Rouge River dredge spoils placed in cell 5; dredged material placed
annually
Contaminants of Concern: Cyanide, Arsenic, Mercury, PCB, DDT, Chlordane,
Chlorinated Benzenes, Octachlorostyrene, Dioxins, Dibenzofurans, Copper,
Cadmium, Lead, Oil & Grease
Source of Contaminants: Not available
MONITORING
Monitoring of Sediment: Sanples tested for Tbtal Kjeldahl Nitrogen,
Anmonia Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Metals, Organics
Water Quality Monitoring: Routine water quality monitoring of dredge
discharge, weir overflow, mixing zone, upstream downstream and one open
water site
Locations of Monitor Wells: None
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: Chlorinated benzene uptake in earthworms (USFWS) from
cells 1 & 2. In cells 3, 4, & 5 no earthworms were found in Spring 1987
Dye Tests: None
Other Studies: None
Conments: None at this time
A-64
-------
Name of CDF: Port Sanilac Village Waterway: Lake Huron
City; Port Sanilac County: Sanilac State: MI
Status: Inactive Type of CDF: Upland
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Raised berm using on-site materials with clay cover on berms
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System: None
Effluent Treatment: None
Capacity (cubic yards): 143,300
Area (acres): 13.0
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Lake Huron
Site Diagram: Attached, Port Sanilac
Description of Setting: Hillside area
Adjacent Land Use: Countryside
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: None
Substrate: Glacial sandy till
REGULATORY ENVIRCNMEM'
Permits: information to be provided
Local Sponsor: Village of Port Sanilac
Intended Ultimate Use: Municipal landfill
Litigation: None
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year Constructed: 1979 Anticipated Fill Date: 1983
A-65
-------
continuation of CDF: Port Sanilac Village
Percent Filled: 100 Nb. of Dredge Operations: 1
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Mechanical
Modifications/Damage/Repairs: None
DREDGED NPiTERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Port Sanilac Harbor
History of Placement in CDF: Not available
Contaminants of Concern: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, CCD, PCB Aroclors
Source of Contaminants: Agricultural runoff
MCNITORING
Monitoring of Sediment: Fire-dredging core samples analyzed for Total
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Armenia Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Metals, Organics
Water Quality Monitoring: None
Locations of Monitor Wells: None
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: None
Dye Tests: None
Other Studies: None
Ccmnents: None at this time
A-66
-------
Name.of CDF: Riverview
City: Holland
Status: Active
Waterway: Holland Harbor, Lake Michigan
County: Allegan State: Mr
Type of CDF: In water, adjacent to land
TECHNICS SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Earthen clay dike with four foot bentonite slurry wall
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System: Weir overflow, in 1982 interior underdrain system added
Effluent Treatment: Natural settling with oil skyraer
Capacity (cubic yards): 120,000
Area (acres): 11.0
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Holland Harbor, Lake Michigan
Site Diagram: Attached, Holland Harbor
Description of Setting: N/A
Adjacent Land Use: Located near a city utility facility, waste treatment
plant and a cormercial radio station
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: None
Substrate: Lacustrine sands and clays
REGULATORY HWIROMNT
Permits: Information to be provided
Local Sponsor: City of Holland
Intended Ultimate Use: Park and government service center
Litigation; None
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year Constructed: 1978 Anticipated Fill Date: N/A
A-67
-------
Continuation of CDF: Riverview
Percent Filled: 84 No. of Dredge Operations: 4
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Hydraulic
Modifications/Damage/Repairs: In 1982 an interior underdrain system added
for dewatering
DREDGED ^PlTERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: A shipping channel within Lake Macatawa and
the Black River
History of Placement in CDF: Not available
Contaminants of Concern: COD, Anuonia, Nitrogen, Iron and Cadmium
Source of Contaminants: Not available
MXJITORING
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dredging core samples analyzed for Total
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Anmonia Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Metals, Organics
Water Quality Monitoring: Dredge discharge, weir overflow, mixing zone,
upstream, downstream
Locations of Monitor Wells: None
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: None
Dye Tests: None
Other Studies: None
CciTTDents: None at this time
A-68
-------
Name of CDF: Saginaw
Waterway: Saginaw Harbor, Lake Michigan
City: Bay City
County: Bay
State: MI
Status: Active
Type of CDF: In lake, island adjacent to nav. channel
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Prepared limestone dike with coverstone
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System discharge weirs with oil skimners
Effluent Treatment: Natural settling
Capacity (cubic yards): 10,000,000
Area (acres): 283.0
Cap Design: Heavily polluted sediments (PCB contamination) capped with
less polluted sediments
SETTING
Waterway: Saginaw River, Lake Huron
Site Diagram: Attached, Saginaw River
Description of Setting: Located near Shelter and Channel Islands
North-northeast of the mouth of the Saginaw River in Saginaw Bay
Adjacent Land Use: Boating and fishing
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: Aquatic wildlife includes
perch/alewife/spottail shiner/bluntnose shiner, nesting area-caspian/cornnon
terns
Substrate: Lacustrine sands and silts
REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT
Permits: information to be provided
Local Sponsor: State of Michigan
Intended Ultimate Use: Wildlife habitat
Litigation: None
A-69
-------
Continuation of CDF; Saginaw
HISTORY OF OFERATICN
Year constructed: 1978 Anticipated Fill Date: 1990
Percent Filled: 48 No. of Dredge Operations: 10+
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Hydraulic
Modifications/Damage/Repairs: Added grout filled mattress to eroded areas
1979 and 1980. Repairs to dike scheduled for Fall 1987
DREDGED MATERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Navigation channel in Saginaw River
History of Placement in CDF: Dredged material placed annually
Contaminants of Concern: Total Volatiles, Arnnonia Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Arsenic, copper, Chromium, Lead, Manganese, Nickel,
Zinc, PCBs
Source of Contaminants: Domestic and industrial wastes, effluents from
Saginaw and Bay City sewage treatment plant, agricultural arid stormwater
runoff
fCNITORING
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dredging core sanples analyzed for Total
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Anrononia Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Metals, Organics
Water Quality Monitoring: None
Locations of Monitor Wells: None
SPECM, STUDIES
Biological Studies: Chlorinated benzene uptake in earthworms (USFWS),
study to determine biologic uptake of contaminants outside dike walls (1987)
Dye Tests: None
Other Studies: FWS/COE/EPA CDF leakage study
Garments: None at this time
A-70
-------
Name of CDF: Sebewaing
Waterway: Sebewaing River, Lake Huron
City: Sebewaing
County: Huron
State: MI
Status: Active
Type of CDF: Upland
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Dike with clay core, stone rip-rap over filter cloth, steel
sheet piling
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System Weir overflow
Effluent Treatment: Natural settling and oil skinnier
Capacity (cubic yards): 84,000
Area (acres): 9.0
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Sebewaing River, Lake Huron
Site Diagram: Attached, Sebewaing River
Description of Setting: Near Sebewaing Airport on eastern edge of Saginaw
Bay
Adjacent Land Use: Sebewaing County Airport, wetlands
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: Waterfowl nesting habitat
Substrate: Glacial till and wetland organic debris
REGULATORY EUVrRCtWEM'
Permits: Information to be provided
Local Sponsor: State of Michigan
Intended Ultimate Use: Extension of Sebewaing County Airport runway and
wildlife habitat
Litigation: None
A-71
-------
Continuation of CDF: Sebewaing
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year constructed: 1979 Anticipated Fill Date: 1989
Percent Filled: 54 No. of Dredge Operations: 2
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Mechanical and hydraulic
Nbdifications/Damage/Repairs: 1987, repairs to west and north dike walls
DREDGED MATERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Sebewaing Harbor & River
History of Placement in CDF: Not available
Contaminants of Concern: CCD, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Armenia
Nitrogen
Source of Contaminants: Agricultural runoff
NENITORING
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dredging core samples analyzed for Total
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Aimonia Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Metals, Organics
Water Quality Monitoring: None
Locations of Monitor Wells: None
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: None
Dye Tests: None
Other Studies: None
Cannents: None
A-72
-------
Name of CDF: Verplank
Waterway: Grand Haven Harbor
City: Grand Haven
County: Ottawa
State: MI
Status: Inactive
Type of CDF: Upland, adjacent to Grand River
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Earthen clay berm
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System: Weir overflow
Effluent Treatment: Natural settling and oil skimmer
Capacity (cubic yards): 134,000
Area (acres): 19.0
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Grand Haven Harbor, Lake Michigan
Site Diagram: Attached, Grand Haven Harbor
Description of Setting: Located on Grand River opposite Harbor Island
Adjacent Land Use: Verplank Coal & Dock Company, Murphy Oil Corporation
and Atlantic Richfield Conpany
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: None
Substrate: Silt
REGULATORY HWIROWENT
Permits: Information to be provided
Local Sponsor: Verplank Coal & Dock Company
Intended Ultimate Use: Not available
Litigation: None
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year Constructed: 1974 Anticipated Fill Date: N/A
A-73
-------
Continuation of CDF: Verplank
Percent Filled: 100
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Hydraulic
Mod i f icat ioris/Damage/Repa i rs: None
No, of Dredge Operations: 4
DREDGED MATERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: Grand Haven Harbor
History of Placement in CDF: Dredged material last placed in 1977
Contaminants of Concern: Phosphorus, Oil & Grease, Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen, COD
Source of Contaminants: Untreated or partially treated domestic and
industrial wastes, agricultural and urban runoff and shipping traffic
MONITORING
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dredgirig core samples analyzed for Total
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Ammonia Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Metals, Organics
Water Quality Monitoring: None
Locations of Monitor Wells: Nbne
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: None
Dye Tests: None
Other Studies: None
Comments: None at this time
A-74
-------
Name of CDF: Whirlpool
Waterway: St. Joseph Harbor
City: Benton Harbor
County: Berrien
State: MI
Status: Interim Facility
Type of CDF: Upland, adjacent to river
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Clay dikes
Liner Design: Impermeable plastic
Dewatering System: Weir overflow
Effluent Treatment: Natural settling
Capacity (cubic yards): 25,000
Area (acres): 14.0
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Paw Paw River
Site Diagram: Attached, St. Joseph River
Description of Setting: Located on Whirlpool Corporation land on the east
bank of the Paw Paw River at the juncture with the St. Joseph River
Adjacent Land Use: Industrial, Whirlpool Corporation
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: None
Substrate: Glacial sandy till
REGULATORY ENVnOWEM1
Permits: Information to be provided
Local Sponsor: State of Michigan
Intended Ultimate Use: N/A
Litigation: None
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year Constructed: 1978 Anticipated Fill Date: N/A
A-75
-------
Continuation of CDF; Whirlpool
Percent Filled: 100 No. of Dredge Operations: 8
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Mechanical and hydraulic
Medi f icat ions/Damage/Repai rs: Raised dikes
DREDGED MATERIAL
Source of Dredged Material: St. Joseph Harbor
History of Placement in CDF: Material placed annually until filled
Contaminants of Concern: Arsenic, Cadmium, Copper, Lead, Manganese, Zinc,
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Source of Contaminants: Not available
MCNTTORING
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dredging core samples analyzed for Total
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Ammonia Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Metals, Organics
Water Quality Monitoring: Routine monitoring at dredge discharge, weir
overflow, mouth of drainage pipe, mixing zone, upstream and downstream
Locations of Monitor Wells: None
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: None
Dye Tests: None
Other Studies: None
Conments: None at this time
A-76
-------
Name of CDF: Wireinill Island Waterway: Holland Harbor, Lake Michigan
City: Holland County: Ottawa State: MI
Status: Inactive Type of CDF: Upland, adjacent to the Black River
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Dike Design: Earthen clay dike
Liner Design: None
Dewatering System: Weir overflow
Effluent Treatment: None
Capacity (cubic yards): 160,000
Area (acres): 16.0
Cap Design: None
SETTING
Waterway: Black River
Site Diagram: Attached, Holland Harbor
Description of Setting: On Windmill Island in Black River, northeast of
Holland
Adjacent Land Use: Surrounded by the Black River and marsh
Special Biological Conditions/Activity: None
Substrate: Sand and silt
REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT
Permits: Information to be provided
Local Sponsor: State of Michigan
Intended Ultimate Use: Park facility
Litigation: None
HISTORY OF OPERATION
Year Constructed: 1978 Anticipated Fill Date: 1988
A-77
-------
Continuation of CDF; Windmill Island
Percent Filled: 100 No. of Dredge Operations: 2
Type of Dredging/Disposal: Hydraulic
Modif ications/Damage/Repairs: Weir added after construction to allow for
hydraulic disposal
DREDGED NKTEREAL
Source of Dredged Material: Shipping channel within Lake Macatawa and
Black River
History of Placement in CDF: Site filled in 1984
Contaminants of Concern: COD, Ammonia Nitrogen, Iron, Cadmium
Source of Contaminants: Direct industrial discharge, municipal .-water
treatment plant discharge, urban and rural runoff
MDNITORING
Monitoring of Sediment: Pre-dredging core samples analyzed for Tv^tal
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Ammonia Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Metals, Organic
Water Quality Monitoring: Routine monitoring of dredge discharge, woir
overflow, mixing zone, upstream and downstream
Locations of Monitor Wells: None
SPECIAL STUDIES
Biological Studies: None
Dye Tests: None
Other Studies: None
Garments: None at this time
A-78
-------
Appendix B
Design Information
-------
Buffalo District
-------
ft
<
D
i—
a
CL
InJ
G"
co*ri o*
CD
I
LAX
EiTif «/i'«*it»
*M«i Mru
m »t«t
# v •
jj ^^fSS&iaw\ i /"
i,\~
* V' ;r:11
• . :-k rii-
i'-i te.y Hi,-— —-1 / I l|V"\, III* 1 !—ril: —3|t 5 r-mn X
i:l y *_'_*"' - ' - - "A »' ¦ "" '•' -¦" * '
""" mtsr IAHU ! *« \ L- -fc J - -¦» — - H Ij ..... •>< ....
^T" """" """ .i^-'kVK' I... [" CASTbufASIM ..1 77 ">
f? v* '* 1 -7^:-^r
ftlAM
•:t
"" ¦***$!'
fflaranr-
innni
f I! vcKv^r%,,
& »4 Oul(< UdiOM
fV'li
CLEVELAND HARBOh
OHIO
U i AhU' I MUM \ U (jfitHlC I » -
X> V4 "#l •< 1"
-------
y/
WELl
llt
I if
ro
//,
'//COVCHPLOW
II
wit*
//,
III
Hi
contractor's
UNLOADING
FACILITIES /
CORP'S
UNLOADING
FACILITIES
o
ovcrflow \V
wim \
V\X\\ WEI. I.
DOAN BROOK
CULVERT
EXTENSION
EXISTING
00AN BROOK
CULVERT
88 Ih. ST. STORM SEWER TO
BE RE - ROUT EO TO JUNCTION
OF EXISTING DOAN BROOK
CULVERT AND CULVERT
EXTENSION.
SITE PLAN
DIKEO DISPOSAL FACILITY
SITE 14
CLEVELAND HARBOR, OHIO
U S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, BUFFALO
ft
<
rc
h-
0:
a
-------
COT *WQlNtE,BS
WAIERfPONT 0*IC*S»«»
o
nj
iHot * to iflmcis
1W- AVHHb-W
-------
HARBOR
LAKE
(BW)
582.6 T/S
4.5 * Cone. Plug
10.5-9-13 Ton Stone
4.6*- j -3 Ton Stone
568.6 L.W.D. V?
SL
553.6
L538.6B/L
2.5-100-1500 lb. Stone
t=
Granular
Hlter Blanket
Sand a Gravel
^ W^ 7? ^^ 7V ^ 77? ^ 77? ^ 77? ^ ^
««X888lS8ggseaaas>% is
_-^.i
205 *
Subsoil Stabilization
498 6 Rock
SECTION A-A
r-
0
SCALE IN F Ft T
!
T
15
30
45
DIKED DISPOSAL ARtAS FOR MAHHOK DREDGINGS
UUPHAIO NbW VOK'K
TYPICAL SECTION - RUBBLE MOUND ALTERNATE
-------
Dike )>4 (BuffaLo)
»rQ»o«*d
Contaimvwif
Struefur*
00**0**^1© N
SCALE IN FEET
I " '"" f - i I
0 500 tOOO 1500
DIKED DISPOSAL AREAS FOR HARBOR DREDGiNGS
BUFFALO NEW YORK
SITE PLAN-SITE 4
B-5
-------
WAT t W RON T OWNERSHIP
ANCC
P*Orf€CT
»
NOTES
DMO
rftOJlC
ERIE HARBOR
PENNSYLVANIA
US ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT BUFFALO
II SEPTdlEI III!
-------
EAST SECTION
WEST SECTION
2'CIA. TIE RODS
20' MAX. CTPS.
2-/2C30
(CON J)
TYPICAL
PDA 27
EX/STING PIER
EXIST. STONE t
TIMBER CRIB
VARIES -5' TO -7'
SOUTH PIER
RECONSTRUCTION.
ERIE CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITY
B-7
-------
A - ARMOR STONE
B- INTERMEDIATE STONE
C - CORE STONE
D-FILTER BLANKET
& RUBBER POND
LINER WWOVEN WIRE
BACKING
BASfN SIDE
FILL-+8.0' L
FILTER
BLANKET'
12'
VARIES *10.5'
TO * I4.Q'
HIGHWATER 574.3 -*5.7
LWD 568.6 » O'
LAKE SIDE
LETTERS ARE
STONE TYPES
LAY ON SURFACE
LAKE BOTTOM
RUBBLEMOUND DIKE
ERIE CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITY
B-8
-------
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
u S. ARMY
WATERFRONT OWNERSHIP
SHOWN TMU» 3)
1 Show 80AT-*a«l 4 -u£0t,£» 01
2 , 8S "WINC HOuJC • Sr*Pt4R0 :nc :01
3 c.ty y *\j*cn 0)
« VO*tCL* * «€ST€«I «A.L*AY 0)
* *LL$»*r ;o«P 101
lOMNOtCATCS OWNCKSMlP CU"NOtCAfCS lCSSCE
P*OjCCT OEPTm 29 fT J-
A, «rt .
AM
COMSO» CNGINIfftS
OlSfOSAL AAEA
phojkt ocrrw it ft
4
mojicr «rrx t« ft.
TURNIM IASIN
UHTWtAM LIMIT
W
V
MjTXDHiJJO M'lCXO
|RIAI«»r|i OIMNMIO
ct 4m<** *t »», 9mHt
{[SCO IM91 IKMrMiiMI Q'tfll lll*l0«t»« fMS)
© Mini StaM ftMttt
£«J HKiltli U.l ItaM
~ iMictln Im) turn Mmf i«m« lifM
HURON HARBOR
OHIO
sou or FCET
U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT BUFFALO
30 3EPTCMBER 1977
B-9
-------
Huron
<~
"M
«-» UJ o,
vi^O
I '"
* , ®
' <~ CD-74-€
f ' -i ft.ou
^ \
"* & C0U-74-
*r CO-74-5
/ /.<%.
£ f/^y
^S//is <$ V
{5TA if'00
& Samp/inf trail-
\o
a
'*0j
¦^y
¦v<*
.CDU-74-1
~f£C°*."»o/f t0.
Hop, —
-< j/* 14*00*
££5£?"-**h
5'°P*IVorrs-„
! /<;< ///r* x*
*> **7 . ,z j66*
»vvv
C0U-74-»l/^x^
$CD-74-0 Hc»°1t 0»tfoil
pro
P'Pi
-------
It**C
o**n«u j
LORAIN HARBOR
OHIO
-------
UinrS O* .1 NV»JLL?>-
ml K .¦¦'¦¦^x
roojrci wim ?»f t
S»A JW'K 42 IO OCCP *»*«€»
/? /Tt
Kff* ¦•*
^NSCT
- .Jl >4i^t
I.HfJ ixrii
»CM <•..* w
IOC5 ?4"*«JO
tt r i w in s«*Oi ?>«. * t pvru «
i r *$r wintM <* joo » t and ?'•' • rvr» i
Rf WAIKDt " Of IHf 400 fl CHAN#* I
IgONMC MSM
rw II fi Df ¦•»
>0 ' T
D€cp wAicn
-n : ,i^ * jofe, " >§£&&£
TOLEDO
rtvm/INC, flASIN
M»ajtc OE^'
L_
/tc* oe^'m j' w -V' >' u v *'• Vr V *•»¦ w*
;' '"a
s •TtHkT*¦ i ~ /*-.** . ' ** - - \
^ />* » ! •«• . * • >
** mM 1 .1 r /* ¦ • •
•JvJ M/ /y . • • • . > t «
• i- *
LtCCNO
UNN»*r. HA>M
PoojfC' Mr I
ft »T
/ATr.-. t
j&i:'':•>?• ••• V:'' *
...... -j.
, r» . • J jJTT^, •'¦¦ •
thiii • /»,, -' ; t*
A// /i' -i' OHIO
trtWt f »t*t* tfTrf/ X. nKXl^ ' / • A • — -
-¦ J a .-"T" • [ '**%I "i am | iim f
*Zi" (./ .r3 -rr•« { ' .•" * r* rnojfc
--
o
•o
QJ
V)
-------
Fa
4
*f£°' ^ o''
-J*
v
« OL t O O
coiaoKt
D >
* «e *.
Qftciua rinxo)
f -ff>*<'A*4/s /o
OSA/_
A R£
B-13
-------
ISLAND DISPOSAL SITE
TOLEDO HARBOR
3000
CO
EV/ST/a/G
P/PEL/MES
PUMP0UT&AZ6B
P/LE
cLusree
HANNEL CE/VT££U»£
-------
Chicago District
-------
cago
WILL
• X"
WELL
- t
well
WELLS
WELLS
WELLS
«OQ'
*e«wc
CHICAGO CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITY
B-15
-------
PREPARED LIMESTONE
m-
ioox
"A" STONE
1.1T
- J. IT
GRADATION
4"
•OX-loot
2 LMMS
7)1
I.IT
2"
J0X- (OX
J/4"
2iX- JiX
STOP*.
210 US - TOO US
j/r
I1X- 4)X
2 LAYERS
m
IM LIS
#10
OX- 20X
1200
OX- )X
"C" STONE
1 LI
- JO US
quAUT ami
PIITEI cum nwiuMii
IMPERVIOUS
membram ¦
DISPOSAL
SIM
1" CMVTCD C" STONE
EICT. -
TTPICAL BECTHM EAST BIKE
«*«, • n' '
¦ EACH C
CIIICACO CONIMNKI) DISPOSAL KACII.ITY
CALUMET HARMS COP
J AMI AAV !«•!
USE 0 - 2JOO* PROM SHORELINE BASELINE
ITU TRANSITIONS EACH END
PLAIT H). 5
-------
n
ZT
H-
C-
00
c
DUAL WELL INSTALLATION
SI ONE
CONFINED OISPOSAI AREA
LAKE StOf
SAND
PREPARED
LIMESTON
—-W 'WW
Harbor, Illinois
-------
L
lart
HAN
MHI • *IK
HIOITCAN CITY CDF
i—
n
3"
H*
OQ
&
3
o
-------
Detroit District
-------
'-J
o\
CD
GftECtt BAY HASQOff
WISCONS*
¦Ji
t—*
>>
v
d
PQ
•-a
C
j_j
0)
u
a
o
J-l
fL
o
>%
Vta/
(C
cc
-------
U3
fb
T3
O
n
rt
V -y A'',
* ¦/? '/v/
Bqypott Site
Asb Areas
Exterl
ratal* 43
formarly
Confined
Disposal Area
rtrr
GREEN BAY HARBOR. WISCONSIN
BAYPORT CONFINED
DISPOSAL AREA
MARCH 1094
-------
typical 0"«c C«fr$5 src"0«
-------
r»OJtC* fit*** #
U
cu
>
•r-4
cc.
c
o
• u
c
•H
•-H
o
CtlfrrOM *
<'MNTOS RIVKII.
MKIIICAN
-------
Clinton River
CORPS OF ENGINEERS ,j s ARMv
.— —7—v
'42 A
\
?
h
laxc s/oe 1*1 basin s/oe
t a.o" icwm
4 Q" - 40
roL£«Awct-
*CAr
.OWCA TOlC^ANCC
cove* stonci >0001* win i
;2000'». max.)
V <
CORE
¦ 0 0'
Tiu^tiTlLANKVf
m
TiLTEWatlNKET
TYPICAL SECTION THRU RUBBLEMOUND BREAKWATER
NO SCALE
SUILT-1966
^ lESTIM*rEOI
£L. J TO * FT.
!¦ aiL'1
*1**4* *4ClNQ
-1LZ19'
UNO'
TYPICAL SECTION THRU EARTH-FILL
NO SCALE
Bui lt-i968
CLINTON" RIVER.
MICHIGAN
In 2 Sh«tt»
Shllt NO. 2
B-23
U S ARMY ENOINEER OISTRICT. OCT'
)0 ittt C
-------
Crooked River
n
BRAJTUS
MAPLE BAY
as
FOREST
CAMP
GROUND
DISPOSAL
CROO^
IVtR RD
RANSFE
ALANSON
CROOKED RIVER CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITY
B-24
-------
CD
I
ro
c_n
DISPOSAL FACILITY PLAN
SCALE: l"r 75'
LEGEND:
nnr UNPAVEO ROAD
LIMITS OF DISPOSAL SITE
CS2D WOODED AREAS TO BE CLEARED
ELEVATIONS REFERENCED TO U.S.G.S. 11929)"
o
UJ
-------
yps or
l ST CLA4P
] CUtOff
' 114 ue p*ce 94
"i Vyit
1 - .,/'*/r»lv ' 4iS*
.rmauecr corn t7 trr.
too rt wioe
rtojtct m?t* tr.sfi
moo ft mtot
s AHM1 1NC«nL£* D«S !•*.!. M IIUI
-------
CD
I
ro
/ '5«9CJ
I s
t,'
.....
ini«ii«in/S tff \k/ Ty ¦ nr.
"St \
| WATERFOWL
»
'. REFUGE
I
I
LAKE
PROJECT
O
DICKINSON
ISLAND
rune*
«4f
#/#
rtstte*
HARSENS
ISLAND
jy \V fc/'i/'O
_-y v-.
*
ST CLAIR
FLATS
cur Mr
\ urni C WILDLIFE
AREA
*0°
^ oi
tmo *r
ST. Clair
r.
rr
Y ¦
3
V.
-------
PUMP-OUT FAClL
DISCHARGE PIPE
DRAIN FOR
EXCESS EFFLUENT
SAMPLE TAKEN
/ HERE
EAR1H DIKE
EARTH DIKE
OREDCiE SPOIL
ANO WATER
Settlement 6a
CRIB
WE IR OUT FLO*
WEIR STRUCTURE
DICKENSON ISLAND CDF
-------
ERIK PICK CDF
mrf
-------
.Afojicr cxrrn ta ri
|V Hmr+4
-------
Grassy Is
DETROIT RIVER
90UNDINC4 tN
nrr
ITATVTf MILC3
(:1 ¦ ¦ I,
U W '
"*¦"" ¦"r-j=if
FICHflNC
ISLAND
GRAUY (I
/
" rr-- <•
WYANDOTTE
I~ / /
~z==Mi
B-31
-------
FF.KHYSIIIIKC
->> / 1
'*8®
V* 1
VERPLANK
T771'
fcJ-Jri
• . fY " ~,VSN
£
POND
i" \w4
0
«41
GRAND HAVEN
GRAND HAVEN HARBOR AND
GRAND RIVER .
MICHIGAN
riioiTV.i n «i M rn«i i v( nisro'-,*! sins
I I MAI I HVI HOMUI N I Al SIAIUINl
s<|l« fl »H«
U s ABUT (NEINltft OlSTRlC T. OK TflOiT
n
cr
O
-------
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
U.S. ARMY
LAKE
f9
M!CH/GAN
*"0pJT%Srr\ />*Oj£Cr ocpth tr "
" ' I
aft04€Cf
ifc
KENOSHA CDF
tf
C0*?i*E0
0*€0GiNO
itoo -
r**f*SL
Sic AA-A*
OlSPOSdL 2 '
AM C A
SCC.XO 3
24
nyTUOilllHG 90CWMIMTS
joc. j;t, Utn 'Mttc.
Mt.tUAL. *JW"*T, IJ1/,
JtX., 1M, ))t« C. . )4 st
»CM«r, .4**, J, i4; *,
>ac. *1, m* x>*c., a *ta
*6 VIO -U**5*S
joc, j, sit* awc., ;j >fc> j
My -Mimis
If, >it* CMC.. .#« it 15.
7iw, *C(M :x*c.. ;a ust
T+. .«*. itt* -«*r, , ;j iEH
-a*q« i. .mi
L A K S
G H / 3 A N
project ocptms and soundings
»»f "?IFE««E0 TO LOW WATEB QATUM
576 i FEET ABOVE MEAN WATER LEVEL
AT FATHER POINT,QUEBEC.I.G.L.0.II955)
INTERNATIONAL GREAT LAKES OATUM)
DEM1MNG HOP* TQ SE OOHf SHORN THUS f//////,1
VICINITY MA
jcikt am naccs
KENOSHA HARBOR
WISCONSIN
IB » SHEETS
smcct m
*«#•> ... f ,
CMumrr nm
*!*
MH.t 0» HIT
¦ ¦CHIMB
•Iff
8 » 8 u
U. 8. ktotl ENCNtER DI8TPMCT, OETAOfT
B-33
* OS. OOVDMMCNT PfWTTIMQ OfFICC 1VM-C44-214
-------
ra
3
O
cn
KENOSHA CDF
DIKE CROSS SECTION
2" DtA. FMERGLAS8
MONITOMNQ WELL
IT. O*
01
L*m »iot
CKIST WATCH
IL.'S 5*
o -
T0*-0"l
¦#»>
"-4.5
IS
-10-
^ fl*Kt
BOTTOM
-9.0' BOTTOM OF Ptt-ES
VARIES
-to J
-1S.0' BOTTOM OF KMQ RLE
EVERY 8th PIE
20
10
30
SCAI.E IN FEET
LEGEND
TYPE "A" STONE - 10 to 18 TONS 78* to WEIGH MORE THAN 13 TONS
TYPE -B- BEDOMG STONE » SAME AS T STONE
TYPE "C* STONE = CORE STONE 3 LBS to 130 LBS
TYPE "F* STONE = CORE 8T0NE 1 LB to SO LBS
TYPE "H" 80% to 76% TYPE F 8 RLTER SAND
-------
KENOSHA CDF
FILTER CELL CROSS SECTION
2" DIA, FIBERGLASS
MONITORING WELL
IAK1
tIDK
-•.O*
pilcs in» down a a shown
(IN niMI BCTVCIM CONMCCtlMO
TfIS
MLi» 8T«I» DOWN AS
SHOWN
*11.0
L.wo.ao
s
FACI
£OfOWl
FILTER HOLES
I I
C(LL riLLsff^1
APPNOX
LAM BOTT.
IS Of %
g-it.-at.o
iL'ti HP OF STEEL PILES
•OTT PILKS
SCALE IN FCCT
-------
KENOSHA & MANITOWOC CDF
MONITORING WELL CROSS SECTION
10' LENGTH •" DIA.
STEEL CASING
2" DIA. FIBERGLASS
MONITORING WELL
DISPOSAL
LAKE SIDE
CONCRETE SEAL
FILTER IBO* to 75* 50 Iba. to CHIPS A
FILTER SAND)
MM. 2" PEA GRAVEL
AROUND SCREEN
no seal*
-------
KENOSHA CDF
CO
I
u>
•Vj
Inflow
STATION 8
- 100
L2i^» 20O
STATION 1
- 300
S-ti MAY 1M4 PUMPED 3O.0SO C.V
WTO NJL COANEK TO P1U0 LEAKS
10.3%
STATION 7
Coalkwd DtepoMl FaclBty
STATIONS
f-aoo
STATION 8
STATION 2 nLTER
CELLS
STATION 3
STATION 4
40.4%
/
J
IIOO
SOUTH PIKE
600
STATION 9
o
u>
3"
-------
<\ewaunee
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
H/G A N
CON?
WAUNEE CDF
PROJECT OIPTMS ANO SOUNOIN93 ARC REFERRED *0
LOW WATER DATUM ST« t FEET ABOVE MEAN «ATER
LEVEL AT FATHER R0INT, QUEBEC. I.O.L 0. 1 93 S)
international great .akes datum)
I
ACTS
lUCX ), 411
AwTNOItZlsf. DOCHMM
ANiLiAi. 000 500 2000 2300
J. s. ARMY ENGlNrr* 0«3TKICT. OETRCIT
Mr(MM« M. >«M,
B-38
j ». eoviam&NT mwrwo omc* nw Kl in
-------
Kewaunee
ft!J' vtf "00 4* $***
*•* »4Tf ,*tf ji
,»r
5# Ifjvlff
^ -
WELL \u
\'9.3t0 i! «
,021 851
8« r |
r*ELL //4
**0C "ff* :ft4l
WELL ^J
•«i*r ' or **c
cotno f •'«.**• ~* »
COm° l*
WELL tP 1
»« »o«e*
JLSt '<***
• w^i*
t ,
"! Lm*OP
8 * *4-1 *
tMNS
f* IK
eo»n op & , /
.,f«A iKt
;H\V
*.i« **
I ft.%rm wMTf
iMMwni
«• a*- »#•»• «*
>0,000 •< tH-
•¦©••r i#
IAN
itaitt
MllNIM §«
c/rr o/* i xffWAwee
Lt-*Z
KEWAUNEE CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITY
B-39
-------
KEWAUNEE CDF
DKE CROSS SECTION
•tarauL site uutf 5iw
tf Mmm Govar** Hit* I
<«.V (Mckl
1" #1*. ruueuss,
NOHITMIK HELL
uivr* siiwF.
IMIlCIUOl STUNK
NATTKtSS SHKIE
r-
racrA*es
LIMESTONE
EiisriE lme aonm
O 5 IB » M «0
Seal* II" (Ml I
l.EKEHP
COVE* STONE |!j - 3 to,ia
UNDEKI.AYEH STONE J00 - 900 lbs
"IP MP 4 MATTRESS STONE 1 lb - 50 lbs
-------
KEWAUNEE CDF
FILTER CELL CROSS SECTION
SIDE
19'
DISPOSAL SIDE
STONE
WEIR
D STONE
I *6.5' E STONE
' +5.0'
% >12
~9.5*
~O1
+6.S'
FINE FILTER SAND
F STONE
EXISTING GROUND
C STONE
-13.0'
2" DIA. FIBERGLASS *12.5*
MONITORING WELL
(9) I" HOLES
B STONE
Scale in Feet
LEGEND
A STONE 7 TONS
B STONE 1-1/2 - 3 TONS
C STONE 300 - 900 lbs.
D STONE 100 - 300 Lbs.
E STONE 1 - 50 lbs.
P STONE 1-1/2 - 2-1/2 inch
-------
KEWAUNEE CDF
MONITORING WELL CROSS SECTION
REMOVABLE CAP
WITH 1/8* § VENT HOLE
2'i2'x1' CONCRETE
9' 1.0. STEEL PIPE
a'-O' LONG
2* 1.0. FIBER
GLASS PIPE
4 6.5
¦2.8
-4.0
EXISTING LAKE BOTTOM
¦ TOP ELEVATIONS FOR
SAMPLING WELLS
IN CELL a 412.75'
IN DIKE 3^12.50'
IN EXISTING
BREAKWATER * +10.00'
PEA GRAVEL 9" 0.0.
(16) 2.9mm WIOE SLOTS,
«' LONG (2) ROWS
WATERTIGHT CAP
not to
B-42
-------
INTERIOR OF CDF
COVERSTONE 35-100 lbs
2 LAYERS RANDOMLY
PLACED ~ 1.6' THICK
y t-WjD.
BOTTOM ©7 II BELOW
L.W O REMOVE SOIL
AS NECESSARY —
' l'
O'O .
LAKESIDE
CREST® 15'
COVERSTONE 975-ilSO it>S.
2 LAYERS RANDOMLY
PLACED -4.C/ THICK
PREPARED
LIMESTONE CORE
It Mil SOLID
PLASTIC LINER
UNDERLAYER <*0-270 lbs
2 LAYERS RANDOMLY
placed ~ 2 V thick
NORTH AND EAST DIKE SECTION
GREEN DAY HAR60R
CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITY
OFFSHORE ISLAND CDF
KIDNEY ISLAND CDF
-------
7Z
H-
a
3
n>
lakeside
COVERSTOHt 225-HOOlbS
2 LAYERS RANDOMLY
PLACED - 2 3' THICK
GO
NTERiOR OF
CREST (® 1^
PRtPARED
limestone: core
UNDERLAYER 20 *6>0 lbs
2 LAYERS RANDOMLY
PLACED" 14 THICK
1Z. MIL SOLID
PLASTIC LINER
BOTTOM© 1 BELOW
LVD. REMOVE SOIL
AS NEC£SS*RY
O
r\
(I
0>
D
W
Ui
COVERSTONE 35-100 lbs.
Z LAYERS RANDOMLY
PLACED I6 TMICK
, L W.D.
WEST ANO SOUTH DIKE SECTION
GREEN BAY HARBOR
CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITY
NEAR SHORE ISLAND CDF
KIDNEY ISLAND CDF
-------
D-
I WOODEN
I WEIR
ADJUSTABLE STOP LOGS
ON THREE SIDES
TOE OF DIKE
TOE OF
DIKE
ec
88
8 x 8 |
WOOOEN 8
WEIR li
STRUCTURES
DIKE
CROWN •
-C*
cn
OF DIKE
PLAN
« 14 PROPOSED DIKE CREST
~ 12
PROPOSED
COF
BAY SIDE
3 ADJUSTABLE
STOP LOGS
I 75
75
1' LWO
BENTONITE
CEMENT SLURRY
LWD
42 ORCP
DISCHARGE
WALL
PIPE @ O I5V. SLOPE
/-TOP OF CLAY
scale: l"=IO'
t , I
LAKE BOTTOM
(-7 (VARIES
SECTION A-A
GREEN BAY HARBOR,
WISCONSIN
CONFINED DISPOSAL F JTY
KIDNEY ISLAND CD
WEIR AND OUTLET STRUCTURE
D El> II I Lw
-------
Kidru
ei. zz
^TEEI.
FlLTgJ? w 6>pe)
PC z
FC-
ACJU6TA6LE
WEiC fTVP)
Pi'^'^vAL -bice
PL AM
FILTER S&WP
4_0'
2 O
•to
At>iUMBQ ' £LAV
FlLT£ff £ELL *>bCT|C>K! A-A
ORE£kj
G£>K/FINED ©1^^>SAU PACIUTV
KIDNEY ISLAND CJDK
eppLus.tvjT tiuTtf* cutust -STieucrucc
B-46
-------
U s
HHPS O' f NGIMU^S
cja
VICMTT
.v".;
A• tf'frvTfcft* S ¦ j../
v. «
M llCH I piA. N.
¦ .?--&* /; . 1 •
• • \T ¦ ' 1 •>¦'"••• T 1
ITOWOC
^^lUDJZnLJL/ fes
rJLon
9*00*
~.OESO£_
-Uf *M-
L_
PjurH
£ i:
k ?>•- V i,: t^ojcet M'twv a—-<0o»t, •imkc. i.n.fc
¦ M-"'.* wo«|t Jpcaltttr^ro ¦* mm snova
iii; i;• '
vis*. . * '
~OJU
MANITOWOC HARBOR
WISCONSIN
ULJUL
us oueuw.ni pmrrmoomct
C
CT3
-------
MANITOWOC CDF
w
St - -00
SIDEWALK,' \
L3 1/ «-4
>_ / 26.42% \ 9-81*
JT/ I \
\
\S
*
/ s \N
8*V' STATION 3 STATION 4 5'52% \\
' —*\ \ \
# L1 STAnoa 2 \ Vi
STATION 9
| 16.12%
Filter C+*»
Conflrwd
/ / STATION 6
"!
DWOOMl
Facility
STATION 8
0.63%
STATION 7
2.57%
14.97%
12.90%
3.89%
\
l STATION 1
2.28%
2.68%
WATER QUALITY
MONITORING
STATIONS
L * LEAKAGE
AREAS
B-48
-------
MANITOWOC CDF
WEST DIKE CROSS SECTION
liri
2" DIA. FIBERGLASS
MONITORING WELL
iPOIL HOC
• mo
m.l$, fxtcri for
KINS PILES AS
SHOW II II LOW A
LAKf ftOTTOM
I t IMC
stone
MM.
it-ll.a. BOTT. Of CwtWV "t'STOmJ
•lh Pitt I'KINC pne »
«' O* 12'
SCALf or PICT
D-STONE 200 TO 40O LBS AVO 300 LBS
C - II 90 LBS TO CHIPS
F II BO * TO 76* TYPE E •'filter SAHIJ
-------
MANITOWOC CDF
EAST DIKE CROSS SECTION
DISPOSAL SIDE
LAKE SIDE
P.M.A. 22 PILE
A-'STONE
~ 2.8
-STON
TONE
IO.O
C - STONE
41.0
BOTTOM RILING
41.0'
EVERY etl) PILING
DRIVEN TO FULL DEPTH
12'
- 2Q-Q' If
SECTION - K-K
12'
A-
STONE
1.7 TO 4.5 TONS
B
1 1
230 TO 900 LBS
C
1 1
1700 TO 4500 LBS
E
1 1
0 TO 50 LBS.
F
1 1
0 TO 50 LBS a SAND
SCALE OF FECT
-------
MANITOWOC CDF
FILTER CELL CROSS SECTION
OISPOSAL SlOt
LAME SlOt
EL.IIO'±
~13.5'
2" D1A. FlbKKCI.ASS
MONITORING Ulil.l.
EL *2.9
-rrTrrrrrrrrrrnrf} ^ | J ^ j |
FILTER SANOj^
TONE l'/2-~ #4
V/\ STOME 2'/2--l'/2-
;TT:^T^.'wlTn fTl
H-T *lli
11111.11
TVPf 'o' STONE
V7 tl.fl O t W D.
FILTER HO
ij -7.5'
HOLES
TTTl'-l ^ LAKE SOT TOM
| 1 1 | 1 111 EL.~ 20.0'
12'
O'
12
•CALK OF FECI
-------
co«rs or (ncmTCRS
u S A»u*
MfC HI C, A N
JUN(*V
uui
~UDULOUL"
!s-p?«uuouiJ
! LJ 3n U [=-4,]5l,4PMrtr51
(UULi3LJ„
JUGL)^
iSJUuffllUl - u-w-iHHr
^\^JLjQ\ll flLl^fUPL3L
)L^
301:
>x (_) ( tjl [J L-i) I- ,;I"L 1
~ijuquuyg
i i>..iiv-> rr,f lUMPi
jljuul©
srij : Ju"Jr
ii/iu !. Ji j(_ i:r
ILJLJLJdUJf
• )l -JI ! ,
jui.i; ilJLjli
" il-IUv
u. iLjur..
w-x\ i. i!" f_iir
JULODLjtfJS.
~~~0
Jugai jLvoLiiai jl
MILWAUKte MARROW
WISCONSIN
JL lULJUUrjU
iLJUlJ L?UJU
JU'^aULJOLlULJL
LJyi^LMQI=JL^^ ?jj u
u » C9»r*iHf«l MMinc rwr<* ui (¦«
-------
MILWAUKEE CDF
DIKE CROSS SECTION
D
c
7'
n>
fD
~10
FILTER CLOTH
FROM ELEV.
+10.0 to +1.0
DISPOSAL SIDE
MOUND OIKC
•V DIA. STAINLESS STEEL
MUNITORINC WELL
TOP OK WELL +10.0
TOP OK WKLI. SCREEN +5.25
~ . LAKE SIOC
O.
-10 .
-so.
CD
I
cn
OJ
\
-40-
FILTER SAND
ASTH 33
SIEVE (Specifications E 11) PERCENT PASSING
LEGEND
9.5mm (3/8 inch)
A.75mm (No. 4)
2.36mm (No. 8)
1.18mm (No. 16)
600um (No. 30)
300um (No. 50)
150um (No. 100)
100
95 to 100
80 to 100
50 to 85
25 to 60
10 to 30
2 to 10
A STONE 2000-5200 lbs
B STONE 200-520 lbs
C STONE CHIPS-50 lbs
0 STONE AND SAND FILTER,
50X STONE 51-125 lbs and
50X FILTER SAND (ASTH 33 GRADATION)
FILTER CLOTH SIEVE SIZE #100 (0.15mn)
10
10
20 SO
SCALE Of FEET
-------
MILWAUKEE CDF
FILTER CELL CROSS SECTION
IV DIA. STAINLESS STEEL
HONITOR1NG Wl-I.l.
•IOC
TOP OF WELL SCREEN 0.00.
BOTTOM OF WELL -9.0
4 to o
EL.~13
PINC FILTER SAND
(¦COkfwl"riLTf"l?v-
MAT L 2-i^r-l-l
rry?/r//>////
CELL FILL
3C.0
DISPOSAL SIDE
-APMtOX LAKE BOTTOM
10 O O 20 SO
Bsa^sesa, ¦ • »»
SCALE OF FEET
-------
MILWAUKEE CDF
MONITORING WELL CROSS SECTION
PROTECTIVE STEEL PIPE
A LOCKING CAP
EXBTMG STONE
EXISTMG SAND A
STONE COMBINATION
EXISTING STONE
CONCRETE PUIG
CONCRETE ANCHOR
1-1/4" M STAINLESS
STEEL P*E
4" 9 DRLL HOLE
1-1/4" 9 STAINLESS STEEL
WELL SCREEN
not to
B-55
-------
U s ARMY
y;~i r : ^
; *? * > ;l '*•• •«- «««»• • •
mt I*, hii I { "«u wm ewiri* wt. it, >r«4l^j -Y ..
..u;U- KSt "Tivmbtf
r.onrs ur lnginilrq
77X+B1
MONh
NONROC COUNTY
pihI'w'i Limit of r9i«o*4trs rm*r»
111
T rv*«orF cihfni co
3 CfXrt0l'f»4t|0 M(tMw. tO«» <01
Mra«rr **ymr coMniiioN
^ «*«• C«*» c««r
I f ¦ ft
" " trvivM
• MOHAOf rc«r rownwN
MONROE HARBOR,
MICHIGAN
WOE* TO BRIDGES
IM>I^ 0
or 1 toi rthtn^Mi »
-------
Monroe (Sterling)
OUTLET
•bTRUCTuRE. U2 Z '
ZO VAL.VEO
, outlet (Typ)
el^ \ sT \ wk
park road
PWA'bS. XL
(~22h *
K
T- (-151),
OUTLET
V>" STRUCTURE. U* 1
'/ /
PHASE I
. ^-ZO" FORCE. MAIN
' ' UUDE.RGROUUO
C-MS)
MOTE*.
UORTH
Fll4rtH GRAUE
ELEVATIONS SWOWk.
TWUS: (+ >8) ARE
RELATIVE TO LOW
water datum
MONROE HARBOR
STERLING STATE PARK CDF
OIKED DISPOSAL FACILITY
-------
Monroe (Sterling)
AGGREGATE. SURFACE
S AMD f tiRAVE'.^
FILTER MAT£.RlA,u
ADjUSTAfecf W£lR
EARTH F\\A_
D\KE sTR^ciuBe.
\Z" UWDERORWW
<& \«5>' C5.UTER«o
^H£tT P\U»^G
i 8' ouT v_E.T P^t
FlUtSH GRAD5.
MONROE HARBOR
STERLING STATE PARK CDF
DIKED DISPOSAL FACILITY
EFFLUENT FILTER AND OUT-
LET STRUCTURE
B-58
-------
PoinL Mouillee
LEGCNO
m««o lunMcro i
4ffAvCl *OA3
GOOD OtMT »0*0
x»t «o«o
Mr WttMC
«*T UAffSM
B Mtmim a«(a
4 90AT LAMCMdi VTf
:;eir
1
£k\ O
STOWE OIHIM'UO
-r^ vntfi?.«n.at.
AVG CIEV
•12'lwO
(00 Ac
WEIR
WEIR
ACCESS CHANNCL
+f L »t>
cur oiri •u'i.»o
WEIR
LAX
ERIE
WEIR
WIER
POINTE MOUIU.EE STATE GAME AREA
MONKOE AIM WATNE COUNTIES .MICMCAN
WEIR
B-59
-------
-N
HURON
ST,
L-
v%
ERIE ST.'
o
u
ONTARIO
ST.
MAIN
-------
CJIII J LHu"n Hij
C
n:
o
ic
AC*va» i
»•»*
Om> 1+m u»e Mw*. c
5T« • n itoH Umt M»*r (jm( (MW L I V> '•*«» *M
ft! »**•»«« U S
OJ
•H
>
S-t
a;
>
DZ
W
fOjfcrl
it
\ /
WlNDMI 1.1. 1. fc FIVERVIKW CDF«;
?L
SEE ENi.ARCEnF.NT
//jt
?&fz
LJDL
no _ ~nr
o. t-lf l1[a h[d
rf • L t
M)«9U
- •«« C(«NT MW. (0)
NMCf4l COM. BOCV
MwinciTTeoiiMci a>
CMM* CVT DOC* 4 UKWCMM (0>
HOLLAND llAUnOK.
M1CI1M5AN
1« •« r«i
TFmjwiihI T?—
U S *n«lt CMCINCCH OISTNICT. OftROIT
yo. nm
~ us. oovcwwcht www two omct hw4«m
-------
HOLLAND IIARBOR, MICHIGAN
PROPOSED DREDGC DISPOSAL PROJECT APCV
VICINITY MAP
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
*
2
J
\
CD
CT>
ro
\
s*('CH/<3A> a/
V.
SI
*
*
*
£
N»
HOLLAND
WINDMILL IS
¦ VS. 4/wDV.
y RW£(t
AV.;
KTVERV1LW
<
n
i-t
<
r-
Q
K
0:
D
d.
-------
mo/rrr o€p*m
rt ft -
CSSQVKU
SMTH $T
rummc au«
mojrcr oerr* forr
TX/HH»K 04ft
*«Mcr cxrr* 13 rr
nt«*v«cc
(SKwiui
VUMtlMC IttIN
SAGINAW RIVF.R,
Mt
-------
Saginaw
DISPOSAL SITE
WEIR
PUMPOUT LOCATION
WEIR LOCATION
AREA - 287 AC
TOP ELEV - +14.0 (IGLO)
CAPACITY - 10.0 M.CY
PERIMETER - 13,900 L.F
7
Lull I»In'i<1
oCinc filled
LAKE SURVEY CENTER
\
. STACKS
'U'lMrtiifhiMl
SAGINAW RIVER
MICHIGAN
1973
Scale 1:20,000
Soundings in Feet
|| (~o-;c. ^
FTTT
FEBHUARY 1975
B-64
-------
Sebewain£
» ^-PlLfr CL
P06.M
etcTioM
V
%oo -o
4 To4 0^ 0IK£
KlPfcAP
(TVP)
— SGALfc* I * 100
«£CTI0W
NORTH
SEBEWAING DISPOSAL AREA
SEBEWAIN6. MICHIGAN
ENLARGED SITE PLAN
B-65
-------
Sebcwaing
lawle side
i 0\
Fin. (MADE £l. 3*7fr,3
vaii^
5FTlS*ENT
£XST. &CADE
EAST Pl^E
TOP.EL, 566.fr
lO'-O"
y- MOMK
SEBEWAING DISPOSAL AREA
SEBEWAING, MICHIGAN
B-66
-------
sz
a
v
V.
c
ihjck 10 9>moocs
TMUf#
*¦'•<••»¦ NwbM **•» front. " P«*f tn4 T*««l
«l IM uj tola «n (.•>« MkNIit*', 4«M
lnHi—«l>.^ «r*«t UMl Ofhm (1*991 I— (.ik, kn••• N« I
Stpf «r r«.i
U & AHWY CMOINCCK WSTHICT. OETAOIT
o
o
CL
-------
OUTSIDE
4
DISPOSAL SIDE
4'-0
5EED TOP 4 SLOPE
Z
FEMCt—^
£ X1 ST. GKADt
2
8ILTY CL^Y
5TON6 OR.
6RAM ULA2.
Fl L.L
+ 1
vS
I
f-
&777t=
SETTLEMENT (5"-l2")
BtNTONirf. SEAL
//////I
DIKE SECTION
DISPOSAL AREA
NO SCALE
DIKE SECTION
ST JOSEPH HARBOR DISPOSAL AREA
ST JOSEPH, MICHIGAN
GIFFELS ASSOCIATES,INC
SOU THFIELD, MICHIGAN
------- |