CASTNET
2016 Annual Report
Prepared for:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Atmospheric Programs
Prepared by:
environmental engineering
& measurement services, inc.
1128 NW 39th Drive
Gainesville, FL 32605
Contract No.: EP-W-12-019
June 2017
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction 1-1
2.0 Project Objectives 2-1
3.0 CASTNET Sites Visited in 2016 3-1
4.0 Performance and Audit Results 4-1
4.1 Ozone 4-2
4.1.1 Ozone Bias 4-5
4.2 Flow Rate 4-8
4.3 Shelter Temperature 4-8
4.4 Wind Speed 4-10
4.4.1 Wind Speed Starting Threshold 4-10
4.5 Wind Direction 4-10
4.5.1 Wind Direction Starting Threshold 4-11
4.6 Temperature and Two-Meter Temperature 4-11
4.6.1 Temperature Shield Blower Motors 4-12
4.7 Relative Humidity 4-12
4.8 Solar Radiation 4-14
4.9 Precipitation 4-15
4.10 Data Acquisition Systems (DAS) 4-15
4.10.1 Analog Test 4-15
4.10.2 Functionality Tests 4-15
5.0 Systems Audit Results 5-1
5.1 Siting Criteria 5-1
5.2 Sample Inlets 5-1
5.3 Infrastructure 5-2
5.4 Site Operators 5-2
5.5 Documentation 5-2
5.6 Site Sensor and FSAD Identification 5-3
6.0 Summary and Recommendations 6-1
6.1 In Situ Comparisons 6-1
7.0 References 7-1
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
1
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
List of Appendices
Appendix 1. Audit Standards Certifications
List of Tables
Table 2-1. Performance Audit Challenge and Acceptance Criteria 2-1
Table 3-1. Site Audits 3-1
Table 3-2. Site Ozone PE Visits 3-3
Table 4-1. Performance Audit Results by Variable Tested 4-1
Table 4-2. Performance Audit Results for Ozone 4-3
Table 4-3. Performance Audit Results Shelter Temperature, and Flow Rate 4-8
Table 4-4. Performance Audit Results for Wind Sensors 4-11
Table 4-5. Performance Audit Results for Temperature and Relative Humidity 4-13
Table 4-6. Performance Audit Results for Solar Radiation and Precipitation 4-15
Table 4-7. Performance Audit Results for Data Acquisition Systems 4-16
List of Figures
Figure 4-1. 2016 Ozone PE Average % Difference 4-7
Figure 4-2. 2017 Ozone PE Average % Difference 4-7
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
11
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
List of Acronyms and Abbreviations
% diff percent difference
A/D analog to digital converter
AQS Air Quality System
ARS Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
BLM Bureau of Land Management
BLM-WY Wyoming's Bureau of Land Management
CASTNET Clean Air Status and Trends Network
CFR Code of Federal Regulation
CMAQ Community Multi-scale Air Quality
DAS data acquisition system
DC direct current
DEP Department of Environmental Protection
deg degree
DQO data quality objectives
DVM digital voltmeter
EEMS Environmental, Engineering & Measurement Services, Inc.
EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
ESC Environmental Systems Corporation
FSAD Field Site Audit Database
g-cm gram centimeter
GPS goblal positioning system
k kilo (1000)
km kilometer
lpm liters per minute
MLM Multilayer Model
m/s meters per second
mv millivolt
NADP National Atmospheric Deposition Program
NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology
NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
NPAP National Performance Audit Program
NPS National Park Service
OAQPS Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
PE Performance Evaluation
ppb parts per billion
QA quality assurance
QA/QC quality assurance/quality control
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
111
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
QAPP
Quality Assurance Project Plan
RH
relative humidity
RTD
Resistance Temperature Detector
SJRWMD
Saint John's Water Management District
SOP
standard operating procedure
SRP
standard reference photometer
SSRF
Site Status Report Forms
TEI
Thermo Environmental Instruments
TTP
Through The Probe
USEPA
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
USFS
U.S. Forest Service
USNO
United States Naval Observatory
V
volts
VDC
volts direct current
WRR
World Radiation Reference
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
IV
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
1.0 Introduction
The Clean Air Status and Trends Network (CASTNET) is a national air monitoring program
developed under mandate of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. Each site in the network
measures acidic gases and particles using a continuous collection filter aggregated over a one
week period and/or other forms of atmospheric pollution. Hourly averages of surface ozone
concentrations and selected meteorological variables are also measured.
Site measurements are used to estimate deposition rates of the various pollutants with the
objective of determining relationships between emissions, air quality, deposition, and ecological
effects. In conjunction with other national monitoring networks, CASTNET data are used to
determine the effectiveness of national emissions control programs and to assess temporal trends
and spatial deposition patterns in atmospheric pollutants. CASTNET data are also used for long-
range transport model evaluations and effects research.
Historically, CASTNET pollutant flux measurements have been reported as the aggregate product
of weekly measured concentrations and model-estimated deposition velocities. The Multi-layer
Model (MLM) was used to derive deposition velocity estimates from on-site meteorological
parameters, land use types, and site characteristics. In 2011, EPA discontinued meteorological
measurements at most EPA-sponsored CASTNET sites. Currently, average historical deposition
velocities are used to estimate dry deposition fluxes (Bowker et al 2011). Deposition velocity
estimations are currently being derived using the Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ)
Model.
As of 2011, nearly all CASTNET ozone monitors adhere to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 58,
and ozone concentration and quality assurance data are submitted to the Air Quality System
(AQS) database. Currently 80 sites at 78 distinct locations measure ground-level ozone
concentrations.
As of January 2017, the network is comprised of 95 active rural sampling sites across the United
States and Canada, cooperatively operated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the
National Park Service (NPS), Environment Canada, Wyoming's Bureau of Land Management
(BLM-WY), and several independent partners. AMEC Foster Wheeler is responsible for
operating the EPA and Environment Canada sponsored sites, and Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
(ARS) is responsible for operating the NPS and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) sponsored
sites. All sites collect filter samples for flux estimates.
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
1-1
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
2.0 Project Objectives
The objectives of this project are to establish an independent and unbiased program of
performance and systems audits for all CASTNET sampling sites. Ongoing Quality Assurance
(QA) programs are an essential part of any long-term monitoring network.
Performance audits verify that all evaluated parameters are consistent with the accuracy goals as
defined in the CASTNET Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP). The acceptance criteria have
changed over the years and EEMS relies on the CASTNET contractor to provide updates to the
acceptance criteria. The current criteria are included in Table 2-1.
Due to budgetary necessity, the meteorological measurements were shifted to operating on an as-
funded basis. The meteorological sensors were audited on an as directed basis.
Table 2-1. Performance Audit Challenge and Acceptance Criteria
Sensor
Parameter
Audit Challenge
Acceptance Criteria
Precipitation
Response
fO manual tips
1 DAS count per tip
Precipitation
Accuracy
2 introductions of known
amounts of water
< ±10.0% of input amount
Relative
Humidity
Accuracy
Compared to reference
instrument or standard
solution
< ±10.0%
Solar
Radiation
Accuracy
Compared to WRR traceable
standard
< ±10.0% of daytime average
Surface
Wetness
Response
Distilled water spray mist
Positive response
Surface
Wetness
Sensitivity
1% decade resistance
N/A
Shelter
Temperature
2 °C
Temperature
Accuracy
Comparison to 3 NfST
measured baths (~ 0° C,
ambient, ~ full-scale)
< ± 0.5° C
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
2-1
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
Sensor
Parameter
Audit Challenge
Acceptance Criteria
Delta
Temperature
Accuracy
Comparison to temperature
sensor at same test point
< ± 0.50° C
Wind
Direction
Orientation
Accuracy
Parallel to alignment
rod/crossarm, or sighted to
distant point
< ±5° from degrees true
Wind
Direction
Linearity
Eight cardinal points on test
fixture
< ±5° mean absolute error
Wind
Direction
Response
Threshold
Starting torque tested with
torque gauge
<10 g-cm Climatronics;
< 20 g-cm R. M. Young
Wind Speed
Accuracy
Shaft rotational speed
generated and measured with
certified synchronous motor
< ±0.5 mps below 5.0 mps input;
< ±5.0% of input at or above 5.0 mps
Wind Speed
Starting
Threshold
Starting torque tested with
torque gauge
<0.5 g-cm
Mass Flow
Controller
Flow Rate
Comparison with Primary
Standard
< ± 5.0% of designated rate
Ozone
Slope
Linear regression of multi-
point test gas concentration
as measured with a certified
transfer standard
0.9000
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
from the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS). Methods and procedures used
are compliant with the National Performance Audit Program (NPAP).
Performance audits are conducted using standards that are certified as currently traceable to the
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) or another authoritative organization. All
standards are certified annually with the exception of ozone standards which are verified as level
2 standards at EPA regional labs at least twice per year.
Site systems audits are intended to provide a qualitative appraisal of the total measurement
system. Site planning, organization, and operation are evaluated to ensure that good Quality
Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) practices are being applied. At a minimum the following
audit issues are addressed at each site systems audit:
• Site locations and configurations match those provided in the CASTNET QAPP.
• Meteorological instruments are in good physical and operational condition and are sited
to meet EPA ambient monitoring guidelines (EPA-600/4-82-060).
• Sites are accessible, orderly, and if applicable, compliant with OSHA safety standards.
• Sampling lines are free of leaks, kinks, visible contamination, weathering, and moisture.
• Site shelters provide adequate temperature control.
• All ambient air quality instruments are functional, being operated in the appropriate
range, and the zero air supply desiccant is unsaturated.
• All instruments are in current calibration.
• Site documentation (maintenance schedules, on-site SOPs, etc.) is current and log book
records are complete.
• All maintenance and on-site SOPs are performed on schedule.
• Corrective actions are documented and appropriate for required maintenance/repair
activity.
• Site operators demonstrate an adequate knowledge and ability to perform required site
activities, including documentation and maintenance activities.
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
2-3
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
3.0 CASTNET Sites Visited in 2016
This report covers the CASTNET sites audited in 2016. Only those variables that were supported
by the CASTNET program were audited. From February through December 2016, EEMS
conducted field performance and systems audits at 37 monitoring sites. Meteorological sensors
at two of the sites (FOR605 and BEL116) were also audited. The locations, sponsor agency and
dates of the audits along with states and EPA Regions are presented in Table 3-1.
Table 3-1. Site Audits
Site ID
Sponsor
Agency
Site Location
State and EPA
Region
Audit dates
IRL141
EPA/SJRWMD
Indian River Lagoon
FL/R4
2/15/2016
SUM156
EPA/USFS
Sumatra
FL/R4
3/1/2016
GAS153
EPA
Georgia Station
GA/R4
3/8/2016
SND152
EPA
Sand Mountain
AL/R4
3/9/2016
SPD111
EPA
Speedwell
TN/R4
3/12/2016
JOT403
NPS
Joshua Tree NM
CA/R9
3/29/2016
COW137
EPA/USFS
Coweeta
NC/R4
4/13/2016
ESP127
EPA
Edgar Evins St. Park
TN/R4
4/14/2016
CHA467
NPS
Chiricahua NM
AZ/R9
4/19/2016
GRC474
NPS
Grand Canyon NP
AZ/R9
4/20/2016
PET427
NPS
Petrified Forest NP
AZ/R9
4/21/2016
MEV405
NPS
Mesa Verde NP
CO/R8
5/31/2016
CAN407
NPS
Canyonlands NP
UT/R8
6/1/2016
GRB411
NPS
Great Basin NP
NV/R9
6/3/2016
FOR605
BLM/EPA
Fortification Creek
WY/R8
6/22/2016
DEN417
NPS
Denali NP
AK/R10
7/7/2016
SAL133
EPA
Salamonie Reservoir
IN/R5
7/19/2016
ANA115
EPA
Ann Arbor
MI/R5
8/15/2016
MKG113
EPA
M. K. Goddard St. Park
PA/R3
8/15/2016
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
3-1
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
Site ID
Sponsor
Agency
Site Location
State and EPA
Region
Audit dates
UVL124
EPA
Unionville
MI/R5
8/16/2016
KEF112
EPA
Kane Experimental Forest
PA/R3
8/17/2016
HOX148
EPA
Hoxeyville
MI/R5
8/18/2016
PSU106
EPA
Penn State University
PA/R3
8/22/2016
RED004
EPA
Red Lake Nation
MN/R5
8/30/2016
WST109
EPA
Woodstock
NH/R1
9/15/2016
ABT147
EPA
Abington
CT/R1
9/17/2016
HWF187
EPA
Huntington Wildlife Forest
NY/R2
10/1/2016
ACA416
NPS/Maine DEP
Acadia NP
ME/R1
10/5/2016
HOW191
EPA
Howland AmeriFlux
ME/R1
10/10/2016
ASH135
EPA
Asliland
ME/R1
10/11/2016
CAT175
EPA
Claryville
NY/R2
10/14/2016
CTH110
EPA
Connecticut Hill
NY/R2
10/15/2016
ARE128
EPA
Arendtsville
PA/R3
10/16/2016
NPT006
EPA
Nez Perce
ID / RIO
10/20/2016
DIN431
NPS
Dinosaur NM
UT/R8
10/25/2016
BEL 116
EPA
Beltsville
MD/R3
11/14/2016
PNF126
EPA
Cranberry
NC/R4
11/26/2016
In addition to the sites listed in Table 3-1 that were visited for complete systems and performance
audits, the 41 sites listed in Table 3-2 were visited to conduct NPAP Through-The-Probe (TTP)
ozone Performance Evaluations (PE). Two sites (GRB411 and ARE128) were visited for both
full systems and performance audits, and ozone PE audits.
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
3-2
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
Table 3-2. Site Ozone PE Visits
Site ID
Sponsor Agency
Site Location
State and EPA
Region
Audit dates
CAD150
EPA
Caddo Valley
AR/R6
2/19/2016
CVL151
EPA
Coffeeville
MS/R4
2/19/2016
ALC188
EPA
Alabama-Coushatta
TX/R6
3/5/2016
PAL 190
EPA
Palo Duro
TX/R6
3/7/2016
BBE401
NPS
Big Bend NP
TX/R6
3/8/2016
MCK131
EPA
Mackville
KY/R4
3/11/2016
MCK231
EPA
Mackville (precision site)
KY/R4
3/11/2016
MAC426
NPS
Mammoth Cave NP
KY/R4
3/14/2016
CKT136
EPA
Crockett
KY/R4
3/29/2016
CDZ171
EPA
Cadiz
KY/R4
3/30/2016
CHE 185
EPA
Cherokee Nation
OK/R6
4/1/2016
PIN414
NPS
Pinnacles NM
CA/R9
4/4/2016
DCP114
EPA
Deer Creek St. Park
OH/R5
4/16/2016
OXF122
EPA
Oxford
OH/R5
4/16/2016
QAK172
EPA
Quaker City
OH/R5
4/17/2016
PND165
EPA
Pinedale
WY/R8
6/17/2016
BAS601
EPA
Basin
WY/R8
6/21/2016
STK138
EPA
Stockton
IL/R5
7/20/2016
ALH157
EPA
Alhambra
IL/R5
7/21/2016
VTN140
EPA
Vincennes
IN/R5
7/22/2016
CNT169
EPA
Centennial
WY/R8
8/18/2016
LRL117
EPA
Laurel Hill St. Park
PA/R3
8/23/2016
NEC602
EPA
Newcastle
WY/R8
8/24/2016
VOY413
NPS
Voyageurs NP
MN/R5
8/29/2016
PRK134
EPA
Perkinstown
WI/R5
9/1/2016
SAN189
EPA
Santee Sioux
NE/R7
9/9/2016
GRB411
NPS
Great Basin NP
NV/R9
9/18/2016
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
3-3
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
Site ID
Sponsor Agency
Site Location
State and EPA
Region
Audit dates
BVL130
EPA
Bondville
IL/R5
9/24/2016
GLR468
NPS
Glacier NP
MT/R8
9/26/2016
CND125
EPA
Candor
NC/R4
10/17/2016
VPI120
EPA
Horton Station
VA/R3
10/17/2016
CDR119
EPA
Cedar Creek St. Park
WV/R3
10/18/2016
PAR107
EPA/USFS
Parsons
WV/R3
10/18/2016
ARE128
EPA
Arendtsville
PA/R3
10/19/2016
PED108
EPA
Prince Edward
VA/R3
10/21/2016
SHN418
NPS
Shenandoah NP - Big Meadows
VA/R3
10/21/2016
GRS420
NPS
Great Smoky Mountains NP
TN/R4
10/27/2016
WSP144
EPA
Washington Crossing St. Park
NJ/R2
11/7/2016
BWR139
EPA
Blackwater NWR
MD/R3
11/8/2016
YEL408
NPS
Yellowstone NP
WY/R8
11/8/2016
BFT142
EPA
Beaufort
NC/R4
11/10/2016
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
3-4
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
4.0 Performance and Audit Results
Table 4.1 summarizes the number of test failures by variable tested. All test results are those
recorded from the site's primary logger.
Performance audit results are discussed for each variable in the following sections. Tables are
included to summarize the average and maximum error between the audit challenges and site
results as recorded by the on-site Data Acquisition System (DAS). Linear regression and percent
difference (% diff) calculation results are included where appropriate. Results that are outside the
CASTNET QAPP acceptance criteria are shaded in the tables.
The errors presented in the tables in the following sections, are reported as the difference of the
measurement recorded by the DAS and the audit standard. Where appropriate, negative values
indicate readings that were lower than the standard, and positive values are readings that were
above the standard value. With the exception of the ozone data, which will be discussed in more
detail in the following section, the errors appear to be random and without bias. The results are
also arranged by audit date. Viewing the results in this order helps to detect any errors that could
have been caused by the degradation or drift of the audit standards during the year. The audit
standards are transported and handled with care, and properly maintained to help prevent such
occurrences. No known problems with the standards were apparent during the year. All
standards were within specifications when re-certified at the end of the year.
Detailed reports of the field site audits, which contain all of the test points for each variable at
each site, can be found in the Appendices of each 2016 Quarterly report. The variable specific
data forms included in Appendix A of each quarter's report contain the challenge input values, the
output of the DAS, additional relevant information pertaining to the variable and equipment, and
all available means of identification of the sensors and equipment for each site.
Table 4-1. Performance Audit Results by Variable Tested
Variable Tested
Number of Tests
Number of tests
Failed
% Failed
Ozone
75
2
1.3
Flow Rate
37
3
8.1
Shelter Temperature (average)
34
17
50
Wind Direction Orientation
Average Error
2
1
50
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
4-1
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
Variable Tested
Number of Tests
Number of tests
Failed
% Failed
Orientation Maximum Error
2
1
50
Wind Direction Linearity
Average Error
1
0
0.0
Linearity Maximum Error
1
0
0.0
Wind Direction Starting Torque
2
1
50
Wind Speed Low Range
Average Error
2
0
0.0
Low Range Maximum Error
2
0
0.0
Wind Speed High Range
Average Error
2
0
0.0
High Range Maximum Error
2
0
0.0
Wind Speed Starting Torque
2
0
0.0
Temperature
30
1
3.3
2 Meter Temperature
7
1
14
Relative Humidity
3
0
0.0
Solar Radiation
3
0
0.0
Precipitation
2
0
0.0
DAS Analog to Digital
32
0
0.0
4.1 Ozone
Seventy five ozone monitor audits were performed in 2016, with two monitors (GRB411 and
ARE128) audited twice. All ozone challenges were conducted to comply with the OAQPS
NPAP-TTP Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) which can be found at
https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/npapsop.html. The results of the ozone audits were uploaded to
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
4-2
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
the AQS database at the end of each quarter. Each was challenged with ozone-free air and four
up-scale concentrations. The ozone test gas concentrations were generated and measured with a
NIST-traceable photometer that was verified as a level 2 standard by USEPA.
Two monitors tested failed the annual PE (GRB411 and ASH135). The ASH135 monitor had a
known problem and was scheduled to be repaired soon after the audit. The GRB411 monitor was
audited a second time approximately three months later and found to be within acceptance
criteria. Results of all ozone audits performed are included in Table 4-2.
Table 4-2. Performance Audit Results for Ozone
Ozone
Average
(% diff)
Ozone
Maximum
(% diff)
Ozone
Slope
Ozone
Intercept
Ozone
Correlation
IRL141
-2.1
-4.6
1.00836
-1.47647
0.99997
CAD150
-3.2
-4.4
0.99138
-1.23118
0.99999
CVL151
-3.8
-4.9
0.97364
-0.61837
1
SUM156
-4.2
-5.5
0.97127
-0.54639
0.99993
ALC188
-2.7
-3.3
0.97778
-0.37153
0.99997
PAL190
-5.1
-5.9
0.95475
-0.34953
0.99996
BBE401
-4.6
-5.9
0.96345
-0.33495
0.99998
GAS 153
-2.8
-3.5
0.97306
-0.03198
0.99999
SND152
-3.7
-4.3
0.97031
-0.34373
1
MCK131
-3.1
-5.1
0.98866
-0.87496
0.99997
MCK231
-3.9
-5.1
0.97274
-0.57623
1
SPD111
-3.1
-4.2
0.98108
-0.58564
0.99999
MAC 426
-2.5
-2.8
0.97892
-0.1997
1
CKT136
-2.7
-3.2
0.97821
-0.23864
1
JOT403
-4.9
-5.3
0.95798
-0.39801
0.99999
CDZ171
-3.5
-4.8
0.97287
-0.32319
0.99999
CHE185
0.7
6.2
0.97361
1.6448
0.99973
PIN414
2.1
3.3
1.03331
-0.71228
0.9999
COW137
-1.0
-1.4
0.99229
0.03487
0.99998
ESP127
-1.3
-2.1
0.975
0.63082
0.99999
DCP114
-1.7
-2.1
0.97443
0.55974
0.99999
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
4-3
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
Ozone
Average
(% diff)
Ozone
Maximum
(% diff)
Ozone
Slope
Ozone
Intercept
Ozone
Correlation
OXF122
-1.4
-1.6
0.98772
-0.26958
0.99998
QAK172
-1.3
-2.1
0.96998
0.98659
1
CHA467
-4.8
-6.7
0.97534
-0.8701
0.9999
GRC474
-4.4
-5.7
0.96775
-0.55396
0.99999
PET427
-3.5
-3.8
0.97261
-0.41686
0.99999
MEV405
-3.4
-6.3
1.01172
-1.62584
0.99817
CAN407
-1.6
-2.6
0.99509
-0.50561
0.99997
GRB411
-9.7
-14.2
0.95038
-1.97991
0.99957
PND165
-4.3
-8.7
0.97932
-0.7121
0.9998
B AS 601
-4.4
-5.4
0.95939
0.02332
0.99996
DEN417
4.7
6.1
1.06973
-1.0724
0.99999
SAL133
-0.7
-1.5
0.98516
0.28944
0.99998
STK138
-1.4
-2.4
0.97109
0.68618
0.99999
ALH157
-1.6
-2.5
0.97394
0.53928
0.99998
VIN140
-2.5
-4.4
0.98104
-0.18851
0.99996
ANA115
0.6
1.2
0.99502
0.55491
1
MKG113
-1.0
-2.0
1.00272
-0.79901
0.99998
UVL124
-1.1
-2.9
1
-0.57786
0.99996
KEF112
-1.3
-2.2
0.98447
0.27377
0.99995
CNT169
6.4
6.8
1.07153
-0.45958
0.99999
HOX148
-0.8
-0.9
0.98573
0.47845
0.99998
PSU106
-1.0
-1.2
0.98609
0.18438
1
LRL117
-1.2
-2.0
0.9773
0.56697
0.99998
NEC602
-1.7
-2.3
0.97977
0.1879
0.99995
VOY413
-1.1
-2.2
0.97748
0.57243
0.99994
PRK134
-4.2
-4.7
0.95671
-0.02669
0.99997
SAN 189
-2.8
-4.0
0.99074
-0.92556
0.99994
WST109
0.1
0.3
0.99396
0.48937
0.99999
ABT147
-1.9
-2.3
0.97593
0.31758
0.99999
GRB411
-6.5
-8.7
0.94866
-0.61043
0.99996
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
4-4
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
Ozone
Average
(% diff)
Ozone
Maximum
(% diff)
Ozone
Slope
Ozone
Intercept
Ozone
Correlation
BVL130
-1.8
-2.5
0.99046
-0.34535
0.99999
GLR468
7.7
8.1
1.0788
-0.12526
0.99998
HWF187
-1.4
-1.8
0.98859
-0.21053
0.99999
ACA416
3.2
3.6
1.02779
0.30046
0.99999
HOW 191
-3.0
-5.3
0.9895
-0.77461
0.99995
ASH135
-19.3
-23.2
0.84488
-1.88979
0.99996
CTH110
-2.7
-4.1
0.98214
-0.50545
0.99997
ARE128
-1.9
-3.3
0.99462
-0.67845
0.99999
CND125
-2.1
-2.3
0.98222
-0.21269
0.99999
VPI120
-1.7
-2.4
0.98939
-0.26083
0.99999
CDR119
-3.7
-4.7
0.97008
-0.20393
0.99996
PAR107
-1.5
-2.0
0.98764
-0.36289
0.99995
ARE128
-2.6
-3.8
0.9828
-0.27955
0.99998
NPT006
-3.2
-4.3
0.9830
-0.77941
0.99999
PED108
-1.3
-2.2
0.99524
-0.38233
1
SHN418
-0.7
-1.5
0.98889
0.10568
0.99993
DIN431
-1.4
-2.4
0.9929
-0.30017
1
GRS420
1.4
5.7
0.98817
0.69307
0.99999
WSP144
-3.8
-4.3
0.96686
-0.67538
0.99988
BWR139
-0.9
-1.5
0.99546
-0.32609
0.99998
YEL408
-0.2
0.2
0.9910
0.49905
0.99998
BFT142
-2.0
-2.4
0.98367
-0.03766
0.99998
BEL116
-5.1
-8.0
0.97281
-0.80589
0.99999
PNF126
3.3
5.3
1.0435
-0.27084
0.99971
4.1.1 Ozone Bias
Figure 4-1 presents the average percent difference of each site ozone PE for 2016. The results
indicate that there may be a slight negative bias. This could be due to the correction factors used
to correct the level 2 standard photometer when performing audits. EEMS follows the EPA
Technical Assistance Document "Transfer Standards for Calibration of Air Monitoring
Analyzers for Ozone'1 October 2013 which can be found at the AMTIC website:
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
4-5
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/qaqc/OzoneTransferStandardGuidance.pdf.
The document provides the rationale for standard photometer designation and the procedures
required to ensure photometer stability. The process involves comparisons to a higher level
standard (in this case a regional EPA level 1 standard) and also multiple comparisons on separate
days, known as "6x6 verification". As described in the document, once the transfer standard
comparison relationship with the level 1 standard has been established and the stability
requirements are met, the actual ozone concentration is calculated by:
1 -
Std. 03 conc. = — (Indicated 03 conc. — /)
Where:
m = average slope
/ = average intercept
EEMS uses this equation with the running 6x6 average slope and intercept to correct level 2
standard photometer measurements back to the regional EPA level 1 standard reference
photometer (SRP).
Since the technical assistance document also states that if any adjustments are made to the
transfer standard a new 6x6 verification is required, EEMS does not adjust the physical settings
(background and span) of the level 2 standards unless the photometer does not meet the criteria
(+/- 3 %) comparison to the level 1 standard. This procedure could be introducing a bias to the
standard since the level 2 standards are only compared to the level 1 SRP two or three times per
year. The running 6x6 slope and intercept averages may not reflect the current relationship
between the level 2 and the level 1 standards.
To further investigate this hypothesis EEMS began correcting the level 2 standard photometer
using the most recent verification results rather than the running 6x6 results starting in 2017.
Preliminary data are presented in Figure 4-2 which shows the average percent differences of the
ozone PE audits performed to date in 2017. The data appear to indicate little if any bias.
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
4-6
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
Figure 4-1. 2016 Ozone PE Average % Difference
Ozone PE Results -- Average % Difference
~ Average % Difference
3=
Q
£ o.o
c
o
u
~
~
~ ~
~
* y i j
~
~
\
* *+* * \
Jan-16 Mar-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17
Date
Figure 4-2. 2017 Ozone PE Average % Difference
5
~~ ~
0.00 I »
-10.00
14-Feb-17
Ozone PE Results - Average % Difference
~ Average % Difference
~*
~ ~
6-Mar-17 26-Mar-17
15-Apr-17
Date
5-May-17
25-May-17 14-Jun-17
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
4-7
EHS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
4.2 Flow Rate
The dry deposition filter pack sampling system flow rates at 37 sites were audited. A NIST-
traceable dry-piston primary flow rate device was used for the tests. Two sites were outside the
acceptance criterion of ± 5.0%.
4.3 Shelter Temperature
At each site reporting ozone concentrations to AQS, the hourly average shelter temperature must
be between 20 and 30 degrees C, or the hourly ozone data may be invalidated. Shelter
temperature was audited at 34 of the sites visited. The method consisted of placing the audit
standard in close proximity (in situ) to the shelter temperature sensor and recording either
instantaneous observations of both sensors, or averages from both sensors. The audit sensors
used are either a Resistance Temperature Detector (RTD) or a Thermocouple.
Most of the differences observed were due to the slow response of the site's shelter temperature
sensors. Nearly all the site sensors lagged behind the audit sensor during the rapid changes in
temperatures observed as the shelter air conditioning or shelter heating cycled on and off. The
shelter temperature sensors never reached the minimum or maximum temperature measured with
the audit sensor. This is not likely to add a large error to the hourly averaged shelter temperature
measurements. However, since the output of the shelter temperature sensors follow a sine wave
curve but the actual shelter temperature does not change following a sine wave curve, if the
shelter temperature is set near the lower or higher allowable limits (20 to 30 degrees C) the actual
hourly averages may be lower or higher than those measured by the site sensors.
The CASTNET QAPP does not make a distinction between shelter temperature and any other
temperature sensor regarding accuracy criteria. However the sensors were evaluated using a 2
degree C acceptance criterion. This criterion better follows the EPA OAQPS guidelines.
The results are summarized in Table 4-3. Flow rate and shelter temperature data are reported
only for the sites that were visited for complete systems and performance audits.
Table 4-3. Performance Audit Results Shelter Temperature, and Flow Rate
Shelter
Temp.
Average
Error (C)
Shelter
Temp.
Maximum
Error (C)
STP Flow
Observed
(1pm)
Flow DAS
(1pm)
Flow Error
(% diff)
IRL141
2.2
2.8
1.48
1.51
1.99
SUM156
-0.2
-0.7
1.48
1.50
1.33
GAS 153
1.0
1.8
1.45
1.50
3.11
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
4-8
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
Shelter
Temp.
Average
Error (C)
Shelter
Temp.
Maximum
Error (C)
STP Flow
Observed
(1pm)
Flow DAS
(1pm)
Flow Error
(% diff)
SND152
0.2
1.6
1.48
1.51
1.77
SPD111
-0.6
-1.2
1.48
1.50
1.33
JOT403
-3.9
-5.3
3.00
3.00
-0.11
COW137
-1.3
-2.1
1.48
1.50
1.55
ESP127
3.0
4.5
1.63
1.51
-7.95
CHA467
2.6
5.3
2.98
3.00
0.67
GRC474
2.8
3.2
2.96
2.99
1.00
PET427
1.0
2.6
3.00
3.03
1.10
MEV405
-0.9
-1.7
3.23
3.00
-7.67
CAN407
3.5
4.2
2.95
3.02
2.32
GRB411
2.7
3.3
3.01
3.00
-0.33
FOR605
3.28
3.37
2.87
DEN417
6.4
14.1
2.98
3.00
0.67
SAL133
1.7
3.1
1.53
1.50
-1.78
ANA115
1.8
4.4
1.49
1.50
0.44
MKG113
-0.1
-0.5
1.50
1.50
0.22
UVL124
2.2
2.3
1.50
1.50
0.00
KEF112
0.8
3.2
1.52
1.50
-1.56
HOX148
2.2
3.8
1.50
1.50
0.00
PSU106
1.4
2.1
1.51
1.50
-0.67
RED004
3.01
3.01
0.00
WST109
0.3
4.1
1.47
1.50
1.78
ABT147
0.1
-1.5
1.51
1.50
-0.44
HWF187
1.3
3.4
1.48
1.50
1.11
ACA416
-2.2
-4.2
1.50
1.38
-8.70
HOW 191
2.8
4.5
1.49
1.50
0.67
ASH135
3.6
3.7
1.48
1.50
1.33
CAT175
1.49
1.51
1.11
CTH110
0.1
0.8
1.48
1.50
1.33
ARE128
5.4
6.8
1.52
1.50
-0.89
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
4-9
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
Shelter
Temp.
Average
Error (C)
Shelter
Temp.
Maximum
Error (C)
STP Flow
Observed
(1pm)
Flow DAS
(1pm)
Flow Error
(% diff)
NPT006
1.1
2.7
3.02
3.00
-0.67
DIN431
3.7
8.9
2.98
3.01
0.89
BEL116
3.9
10.9
1.50
1.50
-0.22
PNF126
-3.8
-4.8
1.52
1.50
-1.33
4.4 Wind Speed
The wind speed sensors at two sites equipped for meteorological measurements were audited.
Wind speed data accuracy results at all sites were found to be well within the acceptance limit.
The results of the wind speed performance audits are presented in Table 4-3.
4.4.1 Wind Speed Starting Threshold
The condition of the wind speed bearings were evaluated as part of the performance audits. The
data acceptance criterion for wind speed bearing torque is not defined in the QAPP. However,
Appendix 1: CASTNET Field Standard Operating Procedures, states that the wind speed
bearing torque should be < 0.2 g-cm. To establish the wind speed bearing torque criterion for
audit purposes the rational described in the QAPP for data quality objectives (DQO) was applied.
The QAPP states that field criteria are more stringent than DQO and established to maintain the
system within DQO. Typically field criteria are set at approximately one-half the DQO.
Therefore, 0.5 g-cm was used for the acceptance limit for audit purposes. This value is within the
manufacture's specifications for a properly maintained system. Both systems were found to be
within the acceptance limit.
4.5 Wind Direction
Two separate tests were performed to evaluate the accuracy of each wind direction sensor:
• A linearity test was performed to evaluate the ability of the sensor to function properly
and accurately throughout the range from 1 to 360 degrees. This test evaluates the sensor
independently of orientation and can be performed with the sensor mounted on a test
fixture.
• An orientation test was used to determine if the sensor was aligned properly when
installed to measure wind direction accurately in degrees true. An audit standard
compass was used to perform the orientation tests.
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
4-10
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
Using the average error of the orientation tests for both sensors tested, one site was outside the
acceptance criterion of ± 5 degrees. The results of the wind direction performance audits are
presented in Table 4-3.
4.5.1 Wind Direction Starting Threshold
The condition of the wind direction bearings were evaluated as part of the performance audits.
The data acceptance criterion for wind direction bearing torque is not defined in the QAPP.
However, Appendix 1: CASTNET Field Standard Operating Procedures, states that the wind
direction bearing torque should be < 10 g-cm for R. M. Young sensors. The manufacturer states
that a properly maintained sensor will be accurate up to a starting threshold of 11 g-cm. To
establish the wind direction bearing torque criterion for audit purposes the rational described in
the QAPP for data quality objectives (DQO) was applied. The QAPP states that field criteria are
more stringent than DQO and established to maintain the system within DQO. Typically field
criteria are set to approximately one-half the DQO. For audit purposes 20 g-cm was used for the
acceptance limit for R. M. Young sensors. Climatronics sensors typically have a lower starting
torque. For audit purposes a threshold of 10 g-cm was selected for Climatronics sensors. One of
the sensors tested was outside of acceptance limits for wind direction starting threshold. The test
results are provided in Table 4-4.
Table 4-4. Performance Audit Results for Wind Sensors
Wind Direction
Wind Speed
Orientation Error
Linearity Error
Starting
Torque
(g-cm)
Low Range Error
High Range Error
Starting
Torque
(g-cm)
Site
Ave
(deg)
Max
(deg)
Ave
(deg)
Max
(deg)
Ave
(rn/s)
Max
(rn/s)
Ave
(% diff)
Max
(% diff)
BEL116
2.0
3.0
1.5
4.0
22.5
0.05
0.180
0.001
0.002
0.35
FOR605
12.5
13.0
0.5
0.09
0.310
0.008
0.019
0.45
* Note: The wind systems acceptance criteria were applied to the average of the results. The data validation section of
the CASTNET QAPP states that if any wind direction or wind speed challenge result is outside the acceptance criterion
the variable is flagged.
4.6 Temperature and Two-Meter Temperature
The EPA sponsored site temperature measurement systems consist of a temperature sensor
mounted at approximately 9 meters above ground-level on a tower. One site (BEL 116) also
utilized a second sensor to measure temperature at approximately two meters from the ground (2-
meter temperature). Sites operated by the Park Service have recently moved the temperature
sensors to two meters from the ground (2 meter temperature).
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
4-11
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
Temperature sensors utilized by the BLM are not the same type as those at other CASTNET sites.
The BLM temperature sensors are combined relative humidity and temperature sensors and not
standalone RTD or encased thermistor temperature sensors. Due to the design of the
RH/Temperature sensor, it cannot be submerged in water baths in order to challenge the sensor at
different temperature audit levels. For that reason the combination RH/Temperature sensors were
audited by placing the sensor in a watertight chamber (RH salt chamber) and then placing the
chamber in an ice-water bath, ambient bath, and hot water bath. Therefore the audit results are
not directly comparable to audit results of RTD or encased thermistor sensors.
All sites use shields to house the sensors that are either mechanically aspirated with forced air, or
naturally aspirated. In all cases the sensors were removed from the sensor shields, and placed in a
uniform temperature bath with a precision NIST-traceable RTD, during the audit.
Results of the tests indicate that all but one (ABT147) of the 29 sensors (10-meter) tested were
within the acceptance criterion.
Only seven 2-meter temperature sensors were tested, with one (FOR605) above acceptance
criterion. It should be noted that FOR605 is sponsored by the BLM and operates a combination
RH/Temperature sensor as described above. The average errors for all sensors are presented in
Table 4-5.
4.6.1 Temperature Shield Blower Motors
All of the temperature sensor shield blower motors encountered during the site audits conducted
during 2016 were found to be functioning. All 2-meter temperature sensor shield blowers were
functioning properly.
4.7 Relative Humidity
The three relative humidity systems that were audited were tested with a combination of primary
standard salt solutions, and a certified transfer standard relative humidity probe. The results of
the average and maximum errors throughout the measurement range of approximately 30% to
95% are presented in Table 4-5.
As in previous years, operation of humidity sensors with respect to natural or forced-air aspiration
can vary between sites. At most EPA sponsored sites humidity sensors are operating in naturally
aspirated shields. At most NPS sponsored sites humidity sensors are operating in shields
designed to be mechanically aspirated with forced-air blowers.
During audit tests with the primary standard salt solutions, the sensors were removed from the
shields and placed in a temperature controlled enclosure. During audit tests with the transfer
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
4-12
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
standard probe, the sensor and transfer were placed in the same ambient conditions. Therefore
the audit tests do not account for differences in the operation of the sensors due to the different
shield configurations.
All sensors tested were within the acceptance criterion. The results of the tests are included in
Table 4-5.
Table 4-5. Performance Audit Results for Temperature and Relative Humidity
Site
Temperature
Ave. Error
(degC)
2 Meter
Temperature
Ave. Error
(deg C)
Relative Humidity
Range 0 - 100%
Ave.
Error
Max.
Error
IRL141
0.19
SUM156
0.00
GAS 153
0.12
SND152
0.11
SPD111
0.06
COW137
0.02
ESP127
-0.20
CHA467
0.04
GRC474
0.09
PET427
-0.22
MEV405
0.31
CAN407
-0.03
GRB411
0.07
FOR605
1.28
0.82
1.30
DEN417
-0.09
SAL 133
0.06
ANA115
0.08
MKG113
0.01
UVL124
-0.06
KEF 112
-0.04
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
4-13
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
Site
Temperature
Ave. Error
(degC)
2 Meter
Temperature
Ave. Error
(deg C)
Relative Humidity
Range 0 - 100%
Ave.
Error
Max.
Error
HOX148
0.12
PSU106
0.28
RED004
-0.03
WST109
0.12
ABT147
-0.81
HWF187
-0.08
ACA416
-0.03
-1.83
-6.40
HOW191
-0.02
ASH135
0.02
CAT 175
0.05
CTH110
0.11
ARE128
-0.05
NPT006
-0.34
DIN431
-0.05
BEL116
0.03
0.19
1.00
3.30
PNF126
0.23
4.8 Solar Radiation
The ambient conditions encountered during the audit visits were suitable (high enough light
levels) for accurate comparisons of solar radiation measurements. A World Radiation Reference
(WRR) traceable Eppley PSP radiometer and translator were used as the audit standard system.
Three sites were tested. All sites had daytime average results that were within the acceptance
criterion. The results of the individual tests for each site are included in Table 4-6. The percent
difference of the maximum single-hour average solar radiation value observed during each site
audit is also reported in Table 4-6 although this criterion is not part of the CASTNET data quality
indicators. Those values greater than ±10% are bold.
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
4-14
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
4.9 Precipitation
The two sites audited used a tipping bucket rain gauge for the obtaining precipitation
measurement data. The audit challenges consisted of entering multiple amounts of a known
volume of water into the tipping bucket funnel at a rate equal to approximately 2 inches of rain
per hour. Equivalent amounts of water entered were compared to the amount recorded by the
DAS. The results are summarized in Tables 4-6.
The FOR605 site is solar powered and the tipping bucket is not heated. The tipping bucket heater
was found to be functioning properly at the BEL116 site.
Table 4-6. Performance Audit Results for Solar Radiation and Precipitation
Site
Solar Radiation Error
Precipitation
Ave. Error
(% diff)
Daytime
Ave.
(% diff)
Std. Max.
Value
(w/m2)
Site Max.
Observed
(w/m2)
Max. Value
(% diff)
10/5/2016
ACA416
-8.55
662
602
-9.46
11/14/2016
BEL116
8.53
531
573
9.0
4
6/22/2016
FOR605
0.14
948
951
0.4
1.9
4.10 Data Acquisition Systems (DAS)
All of the NPS sponsored sites visited utilized an ESC logger as the primary and only DAS. All
EPA sites visited operated Campbell loggers as their only DAS. The results presented in table 4-
7 include the tests performed on the primary logger at each site.
4.10.1 Analog Test
The accuracy of each primary logger was tested on two different channels (if two channels were
available to be used) with a NIST-traceable Fluke digital voltmeter. At the EPA sponsored sites
the channels above analog channel 8 could not be tested since there were no empty channels
available to test. All data loggers were within the acceptance criterion of ± 0.003 volts.
4.10.2 Functionality Tests
Other performance tests used to evaluate the DAS included the verification of the date and time,
and operation of the battery backup system used to save the DAS date, time, and configuration
during a power outage. All DAS were set to the correct date and within ±5 minutes per the
acceptance criterion for time.
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
4-15
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
Table 4-7. Performance Audit Results for Data Acquisition Systems
Site
Analog Test Error (volts)
Date
Correct
(Y/N)
Time
Error
(minutes)
Low Channel
High Channel
Average
Maximum
Average
Maximum
2/15/2016
IRL141
0.0001
0.0001
Y
0.00
3/1/2016
SUM156
0.0003
0.0006
Y
0.00
3/8/2016
GAS153
0.0003
0.0007
Y
0.02
3/9/2016
SND152
0.0003
0.0005
Y
0.47
3/12/2016
SPD111
0.0003
0.0005
Y
0.05
3/29/2016
JOT403
0.0002
0.0004
Y
0.00
4/13/2016
COW137
0.0003
0.0004
Y
0.65
4/14/2016
ESP127
0.0003
0.0005
Y
0.68
4/19/2016
CHA467
0.0004
0.0010
Y
2.17
4/20/2016
GRC474
0.0003
0.0005
Y
0.18
4/21/2016
PET427
0.0007
0.0011
Y
2.12
5/31/2016
MEV405
0.0003
0.0007
Y
3.00
6/1/2016
CAN407
0.0002
0.0006
Y
0.33
6/3/2016
GRB411
Y
0.00
6/22/2016
FOR605
0.0000
0.0000
Y
1.68
7/7/2016
DEN417
0.0004
0.0006
Y
0.00
7/19/2016
SAL 133
0.0003
0.0004
Y
0.00
8/15/2016
ANA115
0.0001
0.0002
Y
0.00
8/15/2016
MKG113
0.0003
0.0004
Y
0.00
8/16/2016
UVL124
0.0001
0.0001
Y
0.02
8/17/2016
KEF 112
0.0003
0.0006
Y
0.07
8/18/2016
HOX148
0.0000
0.0000
Y
0.03
8/22/2016
PSU106
0.0003
0.0005
Y
0.08
8/30/2016
RED004
Y
0.00
9/15/2016
WST109
0.0004
0.0007
Y
0.00
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
4-16
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
Site
Analog Test Error (volts)
Date
Correct
(Y/N)
Time
Error
(minutes)
Low Channel
High Channel
Average
Maximum
Average
Maximum
9/17/2016
ABT147
0.0003
0.0005
Y
0.00
10/1/2016
HWF187
0.0000
0.0000
Y
0.33
10/5/2016
ACA416
Y
0.00
10/10/2016
HOW191
Y
0.22
10/11/2016
ASH135
0.0000
0.0001
Y
0.08
10/14/2016
CAT 175
0.0001
0.0002
Y
0.08
10/15/2016
CTH110
0.0000
0.0000
Y
0.20
10/16/2016
ARE128
0.0001
0.0002
Y
0.08
10/25/2016
DIN431
0.0003
0.0007
Y
2.00
11/14/2016
BEL116
0.0001
0.0001
Y
0.00
11/26/2016
PNF126
0.0000
0.0001
Y
0.00
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
4-17
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
5.0 Systems Audit Results
The following sections summarize the site systems audit findings and provide information
observed regarding the measurement processes at the sites. Conditions that directly affect data
accuracy have been reported in the previous sections. Other conditions that affect data quality
and improvements to some measurement systems or procedures are suggested in the following
sections.
5.1 Siting Criteria
All of the sites that were visited have undergone changes during the period of site operation
which include population growth, road construction, and foresting activities. None of those
changes were determined to have a significant impact on the siting criteria that did not exist when
the site was initially established.
Some sites that are located in state and national parks are not in open areas, and have trees within
the 50 meter criterion established in the QAPP. Given the land use and aesthetic concerns, these
sites are acceptable and represent an adequate compromise with regard to siting criteria and the
goal of long-term monitoring.
5.2 Sample Inlets
With consideration given to the siting criteria compromises described in the previous section, all
but one site (LAV410) visited in 2016 have ozone monitor sample trains that are sited properly
and in accordance with the CASTNET QAPP. All ozone sample inlets are currently being
evaluated with respect to obstructions above the inlet. The acceptance criterion requires that
there should be no obstructions (including trees) within a 22.5 degree angle (object distance must
be at least two times the height) above the ozone inlet. There are trees that violate the 22.5
degree sample inlet requirement at the LAV410 site.
Ozone sample inlets are between 3 and 15 meters. With the exception of one site (WNC429)
Teflon tubing of the proper diameter is used for the ozone inlets. The ozone sample train at
WNC429 is primarily glass with an exhaust fan downstream of the ozone sample port. The ozone
analyzer at WNC429 (South Dakota) is operated by the State.
With the exception of WNC429, the ozone zero, span, and precision calibration test gases are
introduced at the ozone sample inlet, through all filters and the entire sample train. All sample
trains are comprised of only Teflon fittings and materials. Sample inlet particulate filters of 5
micron are present at most sites.
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
5-1
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
The dry deposition filter packs are designed to sample from 10 meters. Most of the filter pack
sample lines are also Teflon. Inline filters are present in the sample trains to prevent moisture and
particulates from damaging the flow rate controller.
5.3 Infrastructure
Sites continue to be improved by repairing the site shelters which had deteriorated throughout the
years of operation. The installation and upgrade of the data loggers and replacement of degrading
signal cables, has been very beneficial to the network. A few of the site shelters are still in need
of repair, but overall the condition of the sites has improved again during the past year.
5.4 Site Operators
Generally the site operators are very conscientious and eager to complete the site activities
correctly. They are willing to, and have performed sensor replacements and repairs at the sites
with support provided by the AMEC and ARS field operations centers. In some cases, where
replacements or repairs were made, documentation of the activities was not complete, and did not
include serial numbers of the removed and installed equipment.
Many of the CASTNET site operators also perform site operator duties for the National
Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP). Many of the NPS site operators also perform other
air, or environmental quality functions within their park. All are a valuable resource for the
program. Some of the site operators mentioned that the CASTNET features in the NPS
"Monitor" are informative, helpful, and appreciated.
Still many of the site operators have not been formally trained to perform the CASTNET duties
by either AMEC or ARS. They had been given instructions by the previous site operators and
over the phone instructions from the field operation centers at AMEC and ARS.
5.5 Documentation
There were some documentation problems with the Site Status Report Forms (SSRF) completed
by the site operators each week during the regular site visits. Common errors included improper
reporting of "initial flow", "final flow", and "leak check" values.
The NPS site operator procedures are well developed and readily accessible at all of the NPS sites
visited. There is an electronic interface (DataView 2) available to view, analyze, and print site
data. There are electronic "checklists" for the site operator to complete during the site visits;
however, all of the CASTNET filter pack procedures are not included in the "checklists". Flow
rates and leak check results are not recorded electronically.
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
5-2
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
An electronic logbook is included in the interface software. This system permits easy access to
site documentation data. Complete calibration reports have been added to the system and
accessible through the site computer, however the reports available on-site are not up to date.
5.6 Site Sensor and FSAD Identification
Continued improvement has also been made in the area of documentation of sensors and systems
used at the sites. It is important to maintain proper sensor identification for the purposes of site
inventory and to properly identify operational sensors for data validation procedures. Many
sensors have had new numbers affixed for proper identification.
Where possible the identification numbers assigned (serial numbers and barcodes) are used within
the field site audit database for all the sensors encountered during the site audits. The records are
used for both the performance and systems audits. If a sensor is not assigned a serial number by
the manufacturer, that field is entered as "none". If it is unknown whether an additional client ID
number is assigned to a sensor, and a number is not found, the client ID is also entered as "none".
If it is typical for a manufacturer and/or client ID number to be assigned to a sensor, and that
number is not present, the field is entered as "missing". If either the serial number or the client
ID numbers cannot be read, the field is entered as "illegible". An auto-number field is assigned
to each sensor in the database in order to make the records unique.
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
5-3
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
6.0 Summary and Recommendations
The CASTNET Site Audit Program has been successful in evaluating the field operations of the
sites. The results of performance and systems audits are recorded and archived in a relational
database, the Field Site Audit Database (FSAD). CASTNET site operations are generally
acceptable and continue to improve. Some differences between actual site operations and
operations described in the QAPP have been identified and described. Procedural differences
between EPA and NPS sponsored sites have also been described.
As discussed previously the shelters have received some much needed attention. It was also
observed that improvements were made to the shelter temperature control systems. As a
requirement in 40 CFR Part 58 for ozone monitoring, shelter temperature is an important variable.
Additional improvement could be made to accurately measure and report shelter temperature.
The previous paragraphs and sections included some recommendations for improving the field
operations systems. One recommendation for improving the audit program is presented in the
following section; this recommendation was also included in the previous annual report.
6.1 In Situ Comparisons
An improvement to the audit procedures designed to evaluate the differences in measurement
technique would be to develop an "In Situ" audit measurement system. This would require a
suite of sensors that would be collocated with the site sensors. Ideally the audit sensors would
address the inconsistent sensor installations observed throughout the network. By deploying a
suite of certified NIST traceable sensors installed and operating as recommended by the
manufacturer and to EPA guidelines, subtle differences in the operation of the existing
CASTNET measurement systems could be evaluated. The "In Situ" sensors would be operated at
each site for a 24 hour period and the measurements would be compared to the CASTNET
measurements. A portable system of meteorological sensors would be beneficial for
meteorological measurement evaluations particularly at BLM sponsored sites.
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
6-1
EEMS
-------
2016 Annual Report — CASTNET
Contract No. EP-W-12-019
USEPA
June, 2017
7.0 References
Office of Air Quality and Planning Standards AMTIC website, SOP and guidance
documents: www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/
Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume II - Ambient
Air Specific Methods - EPA.
Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume IV -
Meteorological Measurements - EPA.
Clean Air Status and Trends Network (CASTNET) Quality Assurance Project Plan (2003) -
EPA.
Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume I: - A Field
Guide To Environmental Quality Assurance - EPA.
Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume II: Parti
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Program Quality System Development - EPA.
Sensitivity of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration multilayer model to
instrument error and parameterization uncertainty: Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol.
105. No. D5, March 16, 2000.
Wind System Calibration, Recommended Calibration Interval, Procedure, and Test
Equipment: November 1999, R. M. Young Company
Bowker, G.E., Schwede, D.B.; lear, G.G.; Warren-Hicks, W.J., and Finkelstein, P.I., 2011.
Quality assurance decisions with air models: a case study of imputation of missing input data
using EPA multi-layer model. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 222, 391e402.
CASTNET ANNUAL REPORT 2016. docx
7-1
EEMS
-------
APPENDIX 1
Audit Standards Certifications
-------
Enter date in yellow highlighted
cell next to "Date". Place cursor next to
mi and type ctrl+a.
Enter new slope and intercept in
yellow highlighted cells
Date
ml
m2
m3
m4
m5
m6
Average HI
Avar age I
^ m (%)
s I (ppb)
Test s r
Test s i
1/20/2016
1/19/2016
1/18/2016
9/21/2015
1/7/2015
1/8/2014
1/20/2016
1/19/2016
1/18/2016
9/21/2015
1/7/2015
1/8/2014
1/20/2016
0.996283
0.99735
0.99700
1.01937
1.01820
1.00420
-0.201849
-0.46253
-0.21412
0.02326
-0.41020
0.35220
1/20/2016 1.00540
1/20/2016 | -0.15221
1/20/2016
1.07
1/20/2016
0.3
EEMS# 01110
At EEMS s/n: 49CPS 70008-364
1/20/2016
BKG = 0.0
COEF = 1.018
Enter date in yellow highlighted
cell next to "Date". Place cursor next to
mi and type ctrl+a.
Enter new slope and intercept in
yellow highlighted cells
Date
ml
m2
m3
m4
m5
m6
1/21/2016
1/20/2016
1/19/2016
1/18/2016
9/21/2015
1/7/2015
1/21/2016
1/20/2016
1/19/2016
1/18/2016
9/21/2015
1/7/2015
Average HI
Avar age I
^ m (%)
s I (ppb)
Test s r
Test s
1/21/2016
0.995048
0.99628
0.99735
0.99700
1.01937
1.01820
-0.212226
-0.20185
-0.46253
-0.21412
0.02326
-0.41020
1/21/2016 1.00387
1/21/2016 | -0.24628
1/21/2016
1.15
1/21/2016
0.2
EEMS# 01110
| At EEMS s/n: 49CPS 70008-364
1/21/2016
Ibkg = 0.0
lcOEF= 1.018
Enter date in yellow highlighted
cell next to "Date". Place cursor next to
mi and type ctrl+a.
Enter new slope and intercept in
yellow highlighted cells
Date
ml
m2
m3
m4
m5
m6
1/21/2016
PASS
1/22/2016
1/21/2016
1/20/2016
1/19/2016
1/18/2016
9/21/2015
1/22/2016
1/21/2016
1/20/2016
1/19/2016
1/18/2016
9/21/2015
Average HI
Avar age I
^ m (%)
s I (ppb)
Test s r
Test s
1/22/2016
0.996080
0.99505
0.99628
0.99735
0.99700
1.01937
-0.281123
-0.21223
-0.20185
-0.46253
-0.21412
0.02326
1/22/2016 1.00019
1/22/2016 -0.22477
1/22/2016 0.94
1/22/2016
PASS
EEMS# 01110
| At EEMS s/n: 49CPS 70008-364
1/22/2016
Ibkg = o.o
lcOEF= 1.018
Enter date in yellow highlighted
cell next to "Date". Place cursor next to
mi and type ctrl+a.
Enter new slope and intercept in
yellow highlighted cells
Enter date in yellow highlighted
cell next to "Date". Place cursor next to
mi and type ctrl+a.
Enter new slope and intercept in
yellow highlighted cells
Enter date in yellow highlighted
cell next to "Date". Place cursor next to
mi and type ctrl+a.
Enter new slope and intercept in
yellow highlighted cells
Date
1/23/2016
Date
1/29/2016
Date
9/12/2016
111!
1/23/2016
0.998330
nil
1/29/2016
1.00680
nil
9/12/2016
1.00466
m2
1/22/2016
0.99608
m2
1/23/2016
0.99833
m2
1/29/2016
1.00680
m3
1/21/2016
0.99505
m3
1/22/2016
0.99608
m3
1/23/2016
0.99833
m4
1/20/2016
0.99628
m4
1/21/2016
0.99505
m4
1/22/2016
0.99608
m5
1/19/2016
0.99735
m5
1/20/2016
0.99628
m5
1/21/2016
0.99505
m6
1/18/2016
0.99700
m6
1/19/2016
0.99735
m6
1/20/2016
0.99628
M
1/23/2016
-0.334816
h
1/29/2016
-0.09460
h
9/12/2016
0.01298
I2
1/22/2016
-0.28112
h
1/23/2016
-0.33482
h
1/29/2016
-0.09460
I3
1/21/2016
-0.21223
h
1/22/2016
-0.28112
I3
1/23/2016
-0.33482
u
1/20/2016
-0.20185
U
1/21/2016
-0.21223
u
1/22/2016
-0.28112
h
1/19/2016
-0.46253 1
h
1/20/2016
-0.20185 1
h
1/21/2016
-0.21223
^6
1/18/2016
-0.21412 1
h
1/19/2016
-0.46253 1
h
1/20/2016
-0.20185
Average 111
1/23/2016
0.99668
1 Average HI
1/29/2016
0.99832
1 Average IH
9/12/2016
0.99953
Avar age I
1/23/2016
-0.28444
Avar age I
1/29/2016
-0.26452
Avar age I
9/12/2016
-0.18527
S m (%)
1/23/2016
0.11
1 $ m (%)
1/29/2016
0.43
1 $ m (%)
9/12/2016
0.50
SI (ppb)
1/23/2016
0.1
SI (ppb)
1/29/2016
0.1
SI (ppb)
9/12/2016
0.1
Test s m
1/23/2016
PASS
Test s m
1/29/2016
PASS
Test s m
9/12/2016
PASS
Test s j
1/23/2016
PASS
Test s j
1/29/2016
PASS
Test s j
9/12/2016
PASS
EEMS# 01110
| At EEMS s/n: 49CPS 70008-364
1/23/2016 6-day
Ibkg = 0.0
lcOEF= 1.018
EEMS# 01110
| At EPA R-4 s/n: 49C PS 70008-364
1/29/2016 Verification
Ibkg = 0.0
lcOEF= 1.018
EEMS# 01110
| At EPA R-7 s/n: 49C PS 70008-364
9/12/2016 Verification
Ibkg = 0.0
lcOEF= 1.018
-------
Enter date in yellow highlightet
cell next to "Date". Place cursor next to
m, and type ctrl+a.
Enter new slope and intercept in
yellow highlighted cells
¦
"sor next to
:in
H;
i mnMti
Date
1/21/2016
S/N=
0517112175
mi
1/21/2016
0.991499
mi
m2
1/20/2016
0.99565
m2
m3
1/19/2016
0.99975
m3
m4
1/18/2016
0.99722
m4
m5
1/7/2015
1.01540
m5
m 6
1/3/2015
0.99307
m 6
Ii
1/21/2016
-0.844393
Ii
h
1/20/2016
-0.23545
h
I3
1/19/2016
-0.73832
I3
14
1/18/2016
-0.43380
I4
I5
1/7/2015
-0.09100
I5
I6
1/3/2015
0.13058
I6
Average m
1/21/2016
0.99876
Average m
Avarage I
1/21/2016
-0.36873
Avarage I
sm(%)
1/21/2016
0.87
sm(%)
SI (ppb)
1/21/2016
0.4
SI (ppb)
Test s m
1/21/2016
PASS
Test s m
Test s j
1/21/2016
PASS
Test Sj
Enter date in yellow highlightet
cell next to "Date". Place cursor next to
Imj and type ctrl+a.
Enter new dope and intercept in
yellow highlighted cells
Date
S/N=
6 \ f 6
z o ,y - i- z
6 1 f 6
Z (/J - 4" Z I
EEMS 01111
6-day calibration
At EEMS 1/21/2016
BKG = -0.6
COEF = 1.020
,
1/22/2016
1/21/2016
1/20/2016
1/19/2016
1/18/2016
1/7/2015
1/22/2016
1/21/2016
1/20/2016
1/19/2016
1/18/2016
1/7/2015
1/22/2016
0517112175
0.993072
mi
0.99150
m2
0.99565
m3
0.99975
m4
0.99722
1.01540
m 6
-0.398185
Ii 1
-0.84439
I2
-0.23545
I3
-0.73832
I4
-0.43380
I5
-0.09100
I6
0.99876
Average m
-0.45686
Avarage I
0.87
sm(%)
0.3
SI (ppb)
PASS
Test s m
PASS
Test Sj
EEMS 01111
16-day calibration
At EEMS 1/22/2016
BKG = -0.6
COEF = 1.020
Enter date in yellow highlightet
cell next to "Date". Place cursor next to
nij and type ctrl+a.
Enter new dope and intercept in
yellow highlighted cells
Date | 1/23/201<
S/N= 05171121'
,
1/23/2016
1/22/2016
1/21/2016
1/20/2016
1/19/2016
1/18/2016
1/23/2016
1/22/2016
1/21/2016
1/20/2016
1/19/2016
1/18/2016
0.994291
0.99307
0.99150
0.99565
0.99975
0.99722
-0.686363
-0.39819
-0.84439
-0.23545
-0.73832
-0.43380
1/23/2016 0.99525
1/23/2016 | -0.55609
1/23/2016
0.30
1/23/2016
0.2
PASS
100 1
Enter date in yellow highlightet
cell next to "Date". Place cursor next to
nij and type ctrl+a.
Enter new dope and intercept in
yellow highlighted cells
Date | 1/29/201<
S/N 05171121'
m2
m3
m4
m5
m6
h
h
u
h
h
1/29/2016
1/23/2016
1/22/2016
1/21/2016
1/20/2016
1/19/2016
1/29/2016
1/23/2016
1/22/2016
1/21/2016
1/20/2016
1/19/2016
1.00100
0.99429
0.99307
0.99150
0.99565
0.99975
0.25770
-0.68636
-0.39819
-0.84439
-0.23545
-0.73832
Average m 1/29/2016 | 0.99588
Avarage I 1/29/2016 | .Q.44Q84~
Sm(%) 1/29/2016 0.38
S j (ppty 1/29/2016 0.4
1/29/2016 PASS
Test s r,
Enter date in yellow highlightet
cell next to "Date". Place cursor next to
Imj and type ctrl+a.
Enter new slope and intercept in
yellow highlighted cells
Date
S/N
m2
m3
m4
m5
m6
Avarage I
sm(%)
s I (ppb)
2/8/2017
1/29/2016
1/23/2016
1/22/2016
1/21/2016
1/20/2016
2/8/2017
1/29/2016
1/23/2016
1/22/2016
1/21/2016
1/20/2016
2/8/2017
2/8/2017
2/8/2017
2/8/2017
Test s n
6 \ f 6
z (»< -) - 4- I z
6 1 / 6
z o,y - j- z 1
i= 1 6^1=1
EEMS 01111
16-day calibration
At EEMS 1/23/2016
BKG = -0.6
COEF = 1.020
EEMS 01111
I Verification
At EPA R-4 1/29/2016
BKG = -0.6
COEF = 1.020
EEMS 01111
I Verification
At EEMS 2/8/2017
BKG = -0.6
COEF = 1.020
,
2/8/2017
0517112175
1.008785
mi
1.00100
m2
0.99429
m3
0.99307
m4
0.99150
0.99565
m 6
0.363823
Ii 1
0.25770
I2
-0.68636
I3
-0.39819
I4
-0.84439
I5
-0.23545
I6
0.99738
Average m
-0.25715
Avarage I
0.65
sm(°o)
0.5
s I (ppbl
PASS
Test s m
PASS
Test Sj
Enter date in yellow highlightet
cell next to "Date". Place cursor next to
nij and type ctrl+a.
Enter new dope and intercept in
yellow highlighted cells
Date | 3/21/201'
S/N= 05171121'
3/21/2017
2/8/2017
1/29/2016
1/23/2016
1/22/2016
1/21/2016
3/21/2017
2/8/2017
1/29/2016
1/23/2016
1/22/2016
1/21/2016
1.002500
1.00879
1.00100
0.99429
0.99307
0.99150
0.458700
0.36382
0.25770
-0.68636
-0.39819
-0.84439
3/21/2017 n 0.99852
3/21/2017 fl -0.14145
100
m
m
S.-J-
EEMS 01111
16-day calibration
At EPA R4 3/21/2017
BKG = -0.6
COEF = 1.020
-------
S/N =0419606966
Enter new slope and intercept in
yellow highlighted cells
Date I 3/4
111! | 3/4/2015 | 0.992773
mi
m2 3/3/2015 0.99785
m2
m3 1/7/2015 1.02480
m3
rOt 1/8/2014 1.01870
ro,
m5 1/4/2014 1.00565
m5
m<5 1/3/2014 1.00489
me
Ij | 3/4/2015 | -0.445048
Ii
I2 3/3/2015 -0.29464
I2
I3 1/7/2015 0.57470
I3
I4 1/8/2014 0.40360
i.
I5 1/4/2014 0.39663
i5
\ 1/3/2014 0.12097
^6
Avar age I
3/4/2015 | 1.00744
3/4/2015 0.12603
^ m (%)
Sltppb)
3/4/2015
1.21
Test sn
3/4/2015 PASS
Test s t
S/N =0419606966
IEnter new slope and intercept in
yellow highlighted cells
Date
Avar age I
S m (%)
Sltppb)
Test s „
Test s,
6 1 f 6
z » /
z o,y -1- z i
EEMS# 01112
AtEEMS
offset = -0.2
span = 1.017
EEMS# 01112
¦AtEEMS
offset = -0.2
span = 1.017
3/9/2015
3/8/2015
3/7/2015
3/5/2015
3/4/2015
3/3/2015
3/9/2015
3/8/2015
3/7/2015
3/5/2015
3/4/2015
3/3/2015
3/9/2015
3/9/2015
3/9/2015
3/9/2015
0.99124
0.99532
0.99277
0.99785
.53651
1.33284
1.46416
1.49499
1.44505
1.29464
0.99405
3/9/2015 PASS
S/N = 0419606966
I Enter new slope and intercept in
yellow highlighted cells
Date
m2
m3
rat
m5
me
Avar age I
SI (ppb)
Test sn
Test S T 6/25/2015
S/N = 0419606966
Enter new slope and intercept in
6/25/2015
3/9/2015
3/8/2015
3/7/2015
3/5/2015
3/4/2015
6/25/2015
3/9/2015
3/8/2015
3/7/2015
3/5/2015
3/4/2015
6/25/2015
yellow highlighted cells
6/25/2015
Date
1/28/2016
0.99659
mi
1/28/2016
1.00120
0.99502
m2
6/25/2015
0.99659
0.99208
m3
3/9/2015
0.99502
0.99124
ro,
3/8/2015
0.99208
0.99532
m5
3/7/2015
0.99124
0.99277
me
3/5/2015
0.99532
-0.18324
Ii
1/28/2016
0.02750
-0.53651
I2
6/25/2015
-0.18324
-0.33284
I3
3/9/2015
-0.53651
-0.46416
I4
3/8/2015
-0.33284
-0.49499
I5
3/7/2015
-0.46416
-0.44505
^6
3/5/2015
-0.49499
0.99384
Average m
1/28/2016
0.99524
-0.40946
Avarage I
1/28/2016
-0.33070
0.21
S m (%)
1/28/2016
0.36
0.1
SI(ppb)
1/28/2016
0.2
PASS
Test s m
1/28/2016
PASS
PASS
Test s j
1/28/2016
PASS
100 1
z (»> ,y - f i
i=i 6
EEMS# 01112
| At EPAR-7
Verification
offset = -0.2
span = 1.017
EEMS# 01112
| At EPA R-4
Verification
offset = -0.2
span = 1.017
-------
Enter date in yellow highlighted
cell next to "Date".
S/N = 0517112167
Enter new slope and intercept in
yellow highlighted cells
Date I 1/2
m2
m3
m4
m5
m6
1/21/2016
1/20/2016
1/19/2016
1/18/2016
9/21/2015
4/29/2015
1/21/2016
1/20/2016
1/19/2016
1/18/2016
9/21/2015
4/29/2015
0.996503
0.99993
1.00076
0.99819
1.02307
1.02260
-0.323250
-0.41890
-0.49351
-0.27641
-0.26399
-0.20400
Average ttl
Avarage I
1/21/2016 1.00684
1/21/2016 -0.33001
S m (%)
SI(ppb) 1/21/2016
1/21/2016 1.24
Test s,
1/21/2016
Test Sj 1/21/2016 PASS
Enter date in yellow highlighted
cell next to "Date".
S/N = 0517112167
Enter new slope and intercept in
yellow highlighted cells
Date I 1/2:
m2
m3
m4
m5
m6
Average IT1
Avarage I
Test 5.
1/22/2016
£ (™, y f f
i=1 6 V i=l
m
EEMS# 01113
6-day calibration
At EEMS 1/21/2016
offset = -0.2
span = 1.015
1/22/2016
1/21/2016
1/20/2016
1/19/2016
1/18/2016
9/21/2015
1/22/2016
1/21/2016
1/20/2016
1/19/2016
1/18/2016
9/21/2015
0.998195
0.99650
0.99993
1.00076
0.99819
1.02307
-0.384025
Sm(%) 1/22/2016
SI(ppb) 1/22/2016
Test S J 1/22/2016 PASS
-0.32325
-0.41890
-0.49351
-0.27641
-0.26399
1/22/2016 1.00278
1/22/2016 -0.36001
EEMS# 01113
16-day calibration
At EEMS 1/22/2016
offset = -0.2
span = 1.015
Enter date in yellow highlighted
cell next to "Date".
S/N = 0517112167
Enter new slope and intercept in
yellow highlighted cells
Date
m2
m3
m4
m5
m6
Average ttl
Avarage I
Test 5.
1/23/2016
1/22/2016
1/21/2016
1/20/2016
1/19/2016
1/18/2016
1/23/2016
1/22/2016
1/21/2016
1/20/2016
1/19/2016
1/18/2016
S m(%) 1/23/2016
SI(ppb) 1/23/2016
1/23/2016
Test S J 1/23/2016
I Enter date in yellow highlighted
cell next to "Date".
S/N = 0517112167
Enter new slope and intercept in
Enter date in yellow highlighted
cell next to "Date".
S/N = 0517112167
Enter new slope and intercept in
I Enter date in yellow highlighted
I cell next to "Date".
Enter new slope and intercept in
100 1
£ ('» ')2 -T-{t
m
S_ =J-
6 1 (6
z o, y - j- z /,
7=1 o V i=1
EEMS# 01113
16-day calibration
At EEMS 1/23/2016
offset = -0.2
span = 1.015
EEMS# 01113
I Verification
| At EPA R4 1/28/2016
offset = -0.2
span = 1.015
EEMS# 01113
(Verification
At EPA R7 9/14/2016
offset = -0.2
span = 1.015
¦yellow highlighted cells
yellow highlighted cells
¦yellow highlighted cells
1/23/2016
Date
1/28/2016
Date
9/14/2016
Date
3/21/2017
0.999917
mi
1/28/2016
1.00770
mi
9/14/2016
1.01342
nil
3/21/2017
1.00560
0.99820
m2
1/23/2016
0.99992
m2
1/28/2016
1.00770
m2
9/14/2016
1.01342
0.99650
m3
1/22/2016
0.99820
m3
1/23/2016
0.99992
m3
1/28/2016
1.00770
0.99993
1114
1/21/2016
0.99650
1114
1/22/2016
0.99820
1114
1/23/2016
0.99992
1.00076
m5
1/20/2016
0.99993
Ills
1/21/2016
0.99650
111,
1/22/2016
0.99820
0.99819
"is
1/19/2016
1.00076
m6
1/20/2016
0.99993
ms
1/21/2016
0.99650
-0.335463
Ii
1/28/2016
0.22470
Ii
9/14/2016
0.32479
Ii
3/21/2017
0.06720
-0.38403
I2
1/23/2016
-0.33546
I2
1/28/2016
0.22470
I2
9/14/2016
0.32479
-0.32325
I3
1/22/2016
-0.38403
I3
1/23/2016
-0.33546
I3
1/28/2016
0.22470
-0.41890
L,
1/21/2016
-0.32325
Lt
1/22/2016
-0.38403
Lt
1/23/2016
-0.33546
-0.49351
I5
1/20/2016
-0.41890
Is
1/21/2016
-0.32325
Is
1/22/2016
-0.38403
-0.27641
Is
1/19/2016
-0.49351
Is
1/20/2016
-0.41890
Is
1/21/2016
-0.32325
0.99892
Average IT1
1/28/2016
1.00050
Average IT1
9/14/2016
1.00261
Average IT1
3/21/2017
1.00356
-0.37193
Avarage I
1/28/2016
-0.28841
Avarage I
9/14/2016
-0.15202
Avarage I
3/21/2017
-0.07101
0.16
$ m (%)
1/28/2016
0.38
S m (%)
9/14/2016
0.65
$ m (%)
3/21/2017
0.65
0.1
SUppb)
1/28/2016
0.3
Si
-------
Ozone Transfer Standard Verification Summary Report
(s
f<
x
\o
\
A
3ft.
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 4 Science and Ecosystem Support Division
Enforcement and Investigations Branch
Superfund and Air Section
980 College Station Rd.
Athens, GA 30605
SESD Project #:
Test#;
#1
"as found"
EPA
Standard
EPA Region 4
Keith Harris
NIST
SRP-10
10
Guest Test Status:
Guest Known Offset:
Agency:
Contact:
Make:
Model:
S/N:
GUEST
Instrument
EEMS
Eric Hebert
49CPS
TEI
49CPS-0419606966
PASS
0
Level 2
Slope
Intercept
R'
High 03
Lower 03
Averages:
1.0012
0.0275
0.9999978
482
0
Upper Tolerance:
1.0300
3.0000
LowerTolerance:
0.9700
-3.0000
Upper
Lower
Date
Time
Date
Time
Range
Range
Start
Start
End
End
File
Slope
Intercept
R2
(ppb Os)
(ppb 03)
01/27/16
1:09 PM
01/27/16
2:59 PM
c0127001.xls
1.0007
0.0686
0.9999974
482
-0.14
01/27/16
2:59 PM
01/27/16
5:00 PM
c0127002.xls
1.0013
-0.0355
0.9999983
482
0.00
01/27/16
5.00 PM
01/27/16
6:49 PM
c0127003.xls
1.0015
0.0285
09999986
481
-0.15
01/27/16
6:49 PM
01/27/16
8:34 PM
c0127004.xls
1.0006
0.1371
0.9999988
482
-0.27
01/27/16
8:35 PM
01/27/16
10:27 PM
c0127005.xls
1 0023
-0.1237
0.9999993
482
0 03
01/27/16
10:27 PM
01/28/16
12:13 AM
c0127006.xls
1.0009
0.0036
0.9999941
483
0.50
01/28/16
12:13 AM
01/28/16
1:58 AM
c0127007.xls
1.0012
0.1138
0.9999984
482
-0 03
Comments:
Instrument tested as found.
Ozone calibration factors at time of test:
O LU 2-
03 BKG: -0.2 ppb 03COEF: 1.017
6 ~~
fdsU)
b
0.
Verification Expires on:
January 28, 2017
Keith Harris
Date 0// 2£/ t <-
Page i of 1
SESDFORM-046-R0
-------
Ozone Transfer Standard Verification Summary Report
O
w.
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 4 Science and Ecosystem Support Division
Enforcement and Investigations Branch
Superfund and Air Section
980 College Station Rd.
Athens, GA 30605
SESD Project #:
Test #:
#
"as found"
EPA
Standard
EPA Region 4
Keith Harris
NfST
SRP-10
10
Guest Test Status:
Guest Known Offset:
Agency:
Contact:
Make:
Model:
S/N:
GUEST
Instrument
EEMS
Eric Hebert
TEI
49CPS
517112167
PASS
0
Level 2
Slope
Intercept
High 03
Lower Os
Averages:
1.0077
0.2247
0,999997
482
0
Upper Tolerance:
1.0300
3.0000
LowerTolerance:
0.9700
-3 0000
Upper
Lower
Date
Time
Date
Time
Range
Range
Start
Start
End
End
File
Slope
Intercept
R2
(ppb 03)
(PPb 03)
01/27/16
1:09 PM
01/27/16
2:59 PM
c0127QQ1.xls
1.0074
0.2954
0.9999975
482
-0.14
01/27/16
2:59 PM
01/27/16
5:00 PM
c0127002.xls
1.0079
0.1305
0.9999968
482
0.00
01/27/16
5:00 PM
01/27/16
6:49 PM
c0127003.xls
1 0083
0.1883
0 9999984
481
-0.15
01/27/16
6:49 PM
01/27/16
8:34 PM
c0127004 xls
1.0071
0 3510
0.9999959
482
-0.27
01/27/16
8:35 PM
01/27/16
10:27 PM
c01270Q5.xls
1.0086
0 0725
0.9999992
482
0.03
01/27/16
10:27 PM
01/28/16
12:13 AM
c0127006.xls
1.0072
0.2073
0.9999928
483
0.50
01/28/16
12:13 AM
01/28/16
1:58 AM
c0127007.xls
1.0073
0.3276
0 9999978
482
-0.03
Comments:
Instrument tested as found. — 2"' I , 0 ^
Ozone calibration factors at time of test: 03 BKG: ,SK) ppb 03 COEF: OJ30O
41 0VA13
^ GU) ft
Verification Expires on:
January 28, 2017
3
m
\?
(n
/ Ooo^v
Keith Harris
iA
Date o)/a?/16
Page 1 of 1
SESDFORM-046-RQ
-------
Ozone Transfer Standard Verification Summary Report
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 4 Science and Ecosystem Support Division
Enforcement and Investigations Branch
Superfund and Air Section
980 College Station Rd.
Athens, GA 30605
SESD Project #:
Test #:
#1
"as found"
Date
Start
01/29/16
01/29/16
01/29/16
Time
Start
9:25 AM
11:10 AM
12:55 PM
Date
End
01/29/16
01/29/16
01/29/16
EPA
Standard
Agency: EPA Region 4
Contact: Keith Harris
Make: NIST
Model: SRP-10
S/N: 10
Guest Test Status:
Guest Known Offset:
GUEST
Instrument
EEMS
Eric Hebert
TEI
49CPS
49CPS-70008-364
PASS
0
Level 2 Slope Intercept
Averages: 1.0068 -0.0946
R^ High 03 Lower 03
0.999997 481 0
Upper Tolerance: 1 0300 3 0000
LowerTolerance: 0.9700 -3.0000
Time
End
11:10 AM
12:55 PM
2:50 PM
File
c0129001.xls
c0129002.xls
c0129003.xls
Slope
1.0066
1 0070
1.0069
Intercept
-0.0851
-0.0748
-0.1239
R
0.9999976
0.9999978
0.9999969
Upper
Range
(ppb 03>
480
481
481
Lower
Range
(PPb 03)
0.08
-0.21
-0.14
Comments:
Instrument tested as found
Ozone calibration factors at time of test:
03BKG: 0,0 ppb 03 COEF: 1.018
Verification Expires on:
-it
s
O\\\o
January 29, 2017
Kcu.' b ''
M - O. 1cl%~32-
\>
D.
Keith Harris
Date
/A ^ / f £
Page 1 of 1
SESDFORM-Q46-RO
-------
Ozone Transfer Standard Verification Summary Report
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 4 Science and Ecosystem Support Division
Enforcement and Investigations Branch
Superfund and Air Section
980 College Station Rd.
Athens, GA 30605
SESD Project #:
T est #:
#
"as found"
Date
Start
01/29/16
01/29/16
01/29/16
Time
Start
9:25 A Mi
11:10 AM
12:55 PM
EPA GUEST
Standard Instrument
Agency: EPA Region 4 EEMS
Contact: Keith Hams Eric Hebert
Make: NIST 49CPS
Model: SRP-1Q TEI
S/N: 10 517112175
Guest Test Status: PASS
Guest Known Offset: 0
Level 2 Slope Intercept
Averages: 1.0010 0 2577
R"4 High 03 Lower 03
0.9999987 481 0
Upper Tolerance: 1 0300 3,0000
LowerTolerance: 0 9700 -3.0000
Date
End
01/29/16
01/29/16
01/29/16
Time
End
11:10 AM
12:55 PM
2:50 PM
File
c0129001 xls
c0129002.xls
c0129003.xls
Slope
1.0000
1.0015
1.0014
Intercept
0.2740
0.2235
0.2757
R
0.9999982
0.9999986
0.9999992
Upper
Range
(PPb 03)
480
481
481
Lower
Range
(ppb 03>
0.08
-0.21
-0.14
Comments:
Instrument tested as found.
Ozone calibration factors at time of test:
03BKG: -0.6 ppb 03 COEF: 1.020
*
Verification Expires on:
January 29, 2017
PzlJ
yv\ -
!p'
0 cic(
-o. 4h dW
Keith Harris
Date
?/-? V
Page 1 of 1
SESDFORM-046-R0
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 7
Science and Technology Center
300 Minnesota Avenue
Kansas City, Kansas 66101
September 15, 2016
Mr, Eric Hebert
EEMS
Dear Mr. Hebert:
Enclosed is a summary of the annual ozone photometer verifications conducted on units
49CPS-70008-364 and 0517112167. These verifications were performed on September 12 and
14, 2016. Each verification consisted of three challenges against Standard Reference Photometer
(SRP) #7. The average slope and intercept from these three challenges, is used to determine if
the photometer is operating in an acceptable manner. Please find enclosed 3 data sheets which
identify this process has been completed and the unit has been deemed acceptable.
Photometer verifications/certifications are evaluated according to the criteria stated in the
"Transfer Standards for Calibration of Air Monitoring Analyzers for Ozone," technical
assistance document. These criteria state that Level 2 transfer standards must have a slope in the
range of 0.97 to 1.03, and an intercept in the range of -3.0 to +3.0. Based on these criteria, unit
number 233-S is acceptable as level 2 transfer standards. Please review the technical assistance
document to establish an average and correction factor based on these results. These results are
not to be used for any physical adjustment to the instrument.
If you have any questions concerning the results of these photometer verifications, please
call me at (913) 551-5063.
Sincerely,
James N. Regehr
Environmental Scientist
Monitoring & Environmental Sampling Branch
Enclosures
-------
Calibrating Institute:
Operator:
Instrument:
Comment:
Standard Reference Photometer
Calibration Report
EPA Region 7
J. Regehr / T. Bui
SRP-07 Cell Length=89.73
Date:
Start Time
End Time:
Certification of EEMS TE149cPS 70008364 SRP Gene Filename: c0912001.xls
Calibrated Instrument:
EEMS
Calibration
Standard
Owner:
EEMS
Results
Value
Uncertainty
Contact:
Make:
Model:
Eric Hebert
TEI
49 c-PS
Slope
Intercept
Covariance
1.00463
0.02891
0.00025
0.06659
-1.7900E-08
Serial Number:
70008-364
Res Std Dev
0.09516
Air Flow Rate:
Lamp Intensity Range:
Number Cone. Points:
Conditioning:
Raw SavedrDark Count On (5)
7.0 l/min
0.0 to 85.0 %
7 Points/Concentration:
45.0 % for 5 minutes
10
Calibration
Data Points
Result
SRP-07
Std. Dev
Dark Count 1
Dark Count 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
f&M) ; 6
Oi* *
17
16
471.5
382.9
287.7
199.1
103.8
74.9
0.0
0
|.o(S
0.7
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
Result
EEMS
Std. Dev
473.6
384.9
289.0
200.1
104.3
75.2
0.0
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
(p dc
EEMS
Predicted Residual
473.68
384.73
289.08
200.05
104.27
75,26
-0.01
2>r-
-0.12
0.14
-0.04
0.09
0.04
-0.09
-0.02
ft
b-
|V\
(.oofyb
D-0
Page 1 of 2
-O. I 4:^17
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 7
Science and Technology Center
300 Minnesota Avenue
Kansas City, Kansas 66101
September 15, 2016
Mr. Erie Hebert
EEMS
Dear Mr. Hebert:
Enclosed is a summary of the annual ozone photometer verifications conducted on units
49CPS-70008-364 and 0517112167. These verifications were performed on September 12 and
14, 2016. Each verification consisted of three challenges against Standard Reference Photometer
(SRP) #7, The average slope and intercept from these three challenges, is used to determine if
the photometer is operating in an acceptable manner. Please find enclosed 3 data sheets which
identify this process has been completed and the unit has been deemed acceptable.
Photometer v erifications certifications are ev aluated according to the criteria stated in the
'Transfer Standards for Calibration of Air Monitoring Analyzers for Ozone," technical
assistance document. These criteria state that Level 2 transfer standards must have a slope in the
range of 0.97 to 1.03, and an intercept in the range of -3.0 to +3.0. Based on these criteria, unit
number 233-S is acceptable as level 2 transfer standards. Please review the technical assistance
document to establish an average and correction factor based on these results. These results are
not to be used for any physical adjustment to the instrument
If you have any questions concerning the results of these photometer verifications, please
call me at (913) 551-5063.
James N. Regefir
Environmental Scientist
Monitoring & Environmental Sampling Branch
Enclosures
-------
\
Calibrating Institute;
Operator:
Instrument:
Comment:
Standard Reference Photometer
Calibration Report
EPA Region 7
J, Regehr / T. Bui
SRP-07 Cell Length=89.73
Certification of EEMS TEI49cPS 0517112167 SRP
Date:
Start Time:
End Time:
me:
ene File
14-Sep-16
14:01
15:16
c0914001.xls
Calibrated Instrument:
EEMS
Calibration
Standard
Owner:
EEMS
Results
Value
Uncertainty
Contact:
Eric Hebert
61115
Slope
1.01229
0.00065
Make:
Model:
TEI
49c-PS
Intercept
Covariance
0.75420
0.17940
-9.5237E-08
Serial Number:
517112167
Res Std Dev
0.26086
Calibration Parameters:
Air Flow Rate:
Lamp Intensity Range:
Number Cone. Points:
Conditioning:
Raw Saved;Dark Count On (5)
7.0 l/min
0.0 to 45.0 %
7 Points/Concentration:
45.0 % for 2 minutes
10
Calibration
SRP-07
EEMS
EEMS
Data Points
Result
Std. Dev
Result
Std. Dev
Predicted
Residual
Dark Count 1
16
Dark Count 2
17
1
486.4
0.3
493,0
0.9
493,17
-0.22
2
408.7
0.2
414.4
0.8
414.48
-0.12
3
290.2
0.2
295.1
1.0
294.54
0.53
4
194.0
0.2
197.2
0.7
197,18
0,04
5
97.5
0.2
99.6
1.0
99.48
0.10
6
76.7
0.2
78.2
0.5
78.41
-0.18
7
0.1
0.2
0.7
1.0
0.85
-0.14
v5
>
4pf.
\,C$
b
t
(d <^
/Vj c l,aolCl
^ ^ e-o qsi -o,isTzoz-
Page 1 of 2
-------
SCOTT-MARRIN, INC.
PGVP Vendor
„ - ID: H12013
653! BOX SPRINGS BLVD. • RIVERSIDE. CA 92507
(951)653-6780 • FAX (95 1) 653-2430 • WWW.5COTTMARRiN.COM
Report Of Analysis
EPA Protocol Gas Mixtures
EEMS01
TO; Env'l. Engineering & Measurement Svcs
Attn: Eric Hebert
8010 Southwest 17th Place
Gainesville. FL 32607
(352)262-0802
REPORT NO: 64679-01
REPORT DATE: April 7, 2014
CUSTOMER PO NO: E HEBERT
CYLINDER NUMBER: JB03523
CYLINDER SIZE: 50A (52 std CU ft)
CYLINDER PRESSURE: 2000 psig
COMPONENT
CONCENTRATION (v/v)
± EPA UNCERTAINTY
REFERENCE STANDARD
ANALYZER
MAKE, MODEL, SIH, DETECTION
REPLICATE
ANALYSIS DATA
Carbon monoxide 1490 ± 16 ppm
Nitric oxide
NOx
Nitrogen dioxide
Sulfur dioxide
15.42 ± 0.11 ppm
15.42 ppm
< 0.08 ppm
15.06 ± 0.16 ppm
02-free Nitrogen Balance
CERTIFICATION DATE: Marcn 21. 2014
GMIS
Cyl#. AAL7017
1125 ± 12 ppm
Exp 11/29/2020
GMIS
Cyl#: CC114770
20.58 ± 0.15 ppm
Exp- 2/25/2017
GMIS
Cyl#' CAC3*67
10.13 ± 0 11 ppm
Exp 6 12/2017
SRM 1681b
Samp#' 1-K-33
Cyl#: CAL016258
983.5 ± 3 ppinv
Exp. 4/1/2015
SRM 1683b
Samp# 45-V-106
Cyl#: CAL017973
4S.79 i 0.34 ppm
Exp 3/25/2019
SRM 1689
Samp#: 98-A-33
Cyl#: FF40537
4.813 ± 0.05 ppm
Exp: 1/8/2017
Carle Insts Model 8000
Serial # 8249
Methanation/FID
Gas Chromatography
LAST CALDATE: 3/3/2014
TECO Model 42C
Serial # 57458-333
Continuous
Chemiluminescence
LAST CAL DATE: 3/14/2014
Bovar/W Res Model 922M
Serial # 9228379-1
Continuous
UV Photometry
LAST CAL DATE: 2/27/2014
3/17/2014
1489 ppm
1491 ppm
1490 ppm
1490 ppm
3/17720 1 4
15.42 ppm
15.41 ppm
15.39 ppm
15.41 ppm
3/14/2014
15.04 ppm
15.08 ppm
15.05 ppm
3/24/2014
1492 ppm
1483 ppm
1492 ppm
1489 ppm
4/1/2014
15.43 ppm
15.46 ppm
15 43 ppm
15.44 ppm
3/21/2014
15.05 ppm
15.06 ppm
15.06 ppm
x: 15.06 ppm 15.06 ppm
EPA EXPIRATION DATE: March 22, 2017
ppm - pmole/mole
% - mole-% x - EPA weighted mean
The above analyses ware ce-?ermed in accordance with Procedure G1 of the EPA Traceability Protocol, Report Number EPA50O/R-12/531, dated May 2012.
The above analyses should not be used if the cylinder pressure is less than 100 psig
ANALYST:
M.J.Monson
APPROVED:
, J, T, Marrin
LUM1NUM CYLINDERS
STANDARD CALIBRATION GASES IN ,
ne on-y liability of this company for gas which fails to comply with this analysis sha; ce replacement or reanalysis thereof by the company without extra cost
-------
SCOTT-MARR1N, INC.
PGVP Vendor
ID: H12013
653 ! BOX SPRINGS BLVD. • RIVERSIDE. CA 92507
<951)653-6780 • FAX (95 J) 653-2430 * WWW.SCOTTMARRIN.COM
Report Of Analysis
EPA Protocol Gas Mixtures
TO:
EEMS01
Env'l, Engineering & Measurement Svcs
Attn: Eric Hebert
8010 Southwest 17th Place
Gainesville, FL 32607
(352) 262-0802
REPORT NO: 64465-01
REPORT DATE: February 18, 2014
CUSTOMER PO NO: E HEBERT
CYLINDER NUMBER: JB03389
CYLINDER SIZE: 50A {52 std CU ft)
CYLINDER PRESSURE: 2000 psig
COMPONENT
CONCENTRATION (v/v)
± EPA UNCERTAINTY
REFERENCE STANDARD
ANALYZER
MAKE, MODEL, 5JN, DETECTION
REPLICATE
ANALYSIS DATA
Carbon monoxide 1402 ±17ppm
Nitric oxide
NOx
Nitrogen dioxide
Sulfur dioxide
02-free Nitrogen
14.10 + 0.10 ppm
14,10 ppm
< 0,07 ppm
14.27 ± 0.16 ppm
Balance
GMIS
Cyl#: AAL17294
2603 ± 26 ppm
Exp 6/27/2020
GMIS
Cyift CC114770
20.49 ± 0.15 ppm
Exp: 9/20/2021
GMIS
Cyl#: CA031S7
10.13 ± 0,11 ppm
Exp. 6/12/2017
SRM 2637a
Samp#: 56-F-35
Cyl#: CAL017149
2438 + 5.1 pprriV
Exp: 11/9/2015
SRM 1683b
Samp# 45-V-106
Cyl#: CAL017973
48,79 ± 0.34 ppm
Exp: 3/25/2019
SRM 16B9
Samp#: 9B-A-33
Cyl#: FF40537
4.813 ± D.05 ppm
Exp: 1/S/2017
Carle Insts Model 8000
Serial # 8249
Methanation/FID
Gas Chromatography
LAST CAL DATE: 1/30/2014
TECO Model 42C
Serial # 57458-333
Continuous
Chemiluminescence
LAST CAL DATE: 2/14/2014
Bovar/W Res Model 922M
Serial# 9228379-1
Continuous
UV Photometry
LAST CAL DATE: 1/27/2014
276/2014
1398 ppm
1398 ppm
1406 ppm
1401 ppm
2/6/2014
14,09 ppm
14.08 ppm
14.Q7 ppm
x : 14,08 ppm
2/5/2014
14,30 ppm
14.29 ppm
14.28 ppm
2/13/2014
1397 ppm
1404 ppm
1407 ppm
1403 ppm
2/14/2014
14.12 ppm
14.09 ppm
14.08 ppm
14.10 ppm
2/12/2014
14.30 ppm
14.18 ppm
14.18 ppm
14,29 ppm 14.22 ppm
CERTIFICATION DATE: February 12, 2014 EPA EXPIRATION DATE: February 13, 2017
ppm - pmole/mole % = mole-% x = EPA weighted mean
The above analyses were performed in accordance with Procedure Gf of the EPA Treceabiitty Protocol, Report Number EPA600/R-12/531. dated May 2012
The above analyses should not be used if the cylinder pressure is less than 100 psig.
ANALYST:
APPROVED:
M.J.Monson
Tne only /ability of this company* for gas which fans to comply with this analysis shall be replacement or reanalysis thereof fay ths company without extra cost
J T. Marrjn
S • ANDARD CALJBRi :ON GASES IN i LJf 'INUV : • _ -JDE-S
-------
Ill I SCOTT-MARRIN, INC.
Ill | 6531 B0X SPRINGS BLVD. • RIVERSIDE, CA 92507
(951)653-6780 • FAX (95 1) 653 - 2430 • WWW.SCOTTMARRIN.COM
Report Of Analysis
NIST-TraceabJe Gas Mixtures
TO:
EEMS01
Env'l, Engineering & Measurement Svcs
Attn; Eric Hebert
8010 Southwest 17th Place
Gainesville. FL 32607
(352)262-0802
REPORT NO: 64465-05
REPORT DATE: February 18, 2014
CUSTOMER PO NO: E HEBERT
CYLINDER NUMBER: JB03440
COMPONENT CONCENTRATION (v/v)
Carbon monoxide
Ultrapure Air
0.590 ± 0.012 ppmv
Balance
NIST TRACEABLE
REFERENCE STANDARD
SRM 2612a
Cylinder Size: 50A (52 std cu ft.)
Cylinder Pressure: 2000 psig
Shelf Life: 24 months
ppm = umole/mole
% = mole-%
standard^Lted hem\n^WhTre^ndicat&ri 2°^' °f Standards Technology by interoomparison with the reference
balance. NIST Certificate Numbers 822/272601*6 and Standards are traceable th™ use of our analytical
ANALYST
MJ.Monson
APPROVED:
J. T Marrin
The only liability of this company for gas which fails com- a if- it-» s—
y eas wrucn Woras® &s s/a w-ejaa^e-: :• -e3-3 .si
- ¦ - wA_ BRA hjf, GASEte . =
: r CD'IDSf y WlthC'Jl ext'a COSt
-------
TO:
SCOTT-MARRIN INC
(Mt! ®3-™'nGS?LVD' ' ™^RS,DE.cI 92507
AX (9511653-2430 • WWW.SCOTTMARRIN.COM
Report Of Analysis
NIST-Traeeable Gas Mixtures
EEMS01
Envl, Engineering & Measurement Svcs
Attn; Eric Hebert
8010 Southwest 17th Place
Gainesville, FL 32607
(352) 262-0802
REPORT NO
REPORT DATE
CUSTOMER PO NO
64465-05
February 18, 2014
E HEBERT
CYLINDER NUMBER: JB03443
COMPONENT CONCENTRATION (v/v)
Carbon monoxide
Ultrapure Air
0.591 ± 0.012 ppmv
Balance
NIST TRACEABLE
REFERENCE STANDARD
SRM 2612a
Cylinder Size 50A (52 std cu ft)
Cylinder Pressure: 2000 psig
Shelf Life: 24 months
ppm = umote/rnole
% = moIe-%
stan d arcHitste'd he re i n. i n d i ca ted, ^ Tef ™'°9y b* ^comparison with the reference
balance. NIST Certificate Numbers 822/27280? 6 and sSSaTSf ^ thfU USe of our
ANALYST;
M .J.Monson
_ APPROVED:
The on|y Nabillty of thj£ compsny for gas ^ (o ^ ^ ^ ^
s.ANDARD calibration '¦
J. T. Marrin
= wripanj MWoul e«T'3 :
-------
SCOTT-MARRIN, INC.
PGVP Vendor
ID: H12013
6531 BOX SPRINGS BLVD. • RIVERSIDE. CA 92507
(951)653-6780 • FAX (95 1) 653-2430 • WWW.SCOTTMARRIN.COM
Report Of Analysis
ERA Protocol Gas Mixtures
EEMS01
TO: Env'l, Engineering & Measurement Svcs
Attn: Eric Hebert
8010 Southwest 17th Place
Gainesville, FL 32607
(352) 262-0802
REPORT NO: 64679-03
REPORT DATE; April 7, 2014
CUSTOMER PO NO: E HEBERT
CYLINDER NUMBER: JB034S5
CYLINDER SIZE: 50A (52 std CU ft)
CYLINDER PRESSURE: 2000 psig
COMPONENT
CONCENTRATION (v/vj
± EPA UNCERTAINTY
REFERENCE STANDARD
ANALYZER
MAKE. MODEL, S/N. DETECTION
REPLICATE
ANALYSIS DATA
Carbon monoxide 4.48 ± 0.07 ppm
GMIS SRM 2613a Carle Insts Model 8000
Samp#: 22-16-E Serial # 8249
Cyl#' CC1Q1213 Cyl#: CLMQ9661 Methanation/FID
11.07 ±0.14 ppm 19 72 ±0.25 ppm Gas Chromatography
Exp: 10/15/2021 Exp: 8/1/2017 LAST CAL DATE: 3/3/2014
3/13/2014
450ppm
4.50 ppm
4.48 ppm
x: 4.49 ppm
3/20/2Q14
4.47 ppm
4.47 ppm
4.50 ppm
4.48 ppm
Uitrapure Air
CERTIFICATION DAT
Balance
Eif Marc
March 20, 2014
EPA EXPIRATION DATE: March 21, 2022
ppm = nmole/mole % = mole-% x - tPA weighted mean
The above analyses were performed in accordance with Procedure G1 of the EPA Traceabiiity Protocol, Report Number EPA600/R-12/531, dated May 2012,
The above analyses should not be used if the cylinder pressure is less than 100 psig.
ANALYST:
APPROVED:
M J Monson
The only liability of this company for gas which fails to comply with tills analysis shall be replacement or reanaiysis thereof by the comeany without extra cost.
. J T Mamn
STANDARD CALi3RAi i'DN GASES <*i < LUM NUM CV . *;DE-S
-------
PGVP Vendor
ID: H12013
SCOTT-MARRIN, INC.
6531 BOX SPRINGS BLVD. • RIVERSIDE. CA 92507
(951)653-6780 • FAX (95 1) 653-2430 • WWW.SCOTTMARRIN.COM
Report Of Analysis
EPA Protocol Gas Mixtures
TO:
EEMS01
Env'l, Engineering & Measurement Svcs
Attn: Eric Hebert
8010 Southwest 17th Place
Gainesville, FL 32607
(352) 262-0802
REPORT NO: 64465-03
REPORT DATE: February 18, 2014
CUSTOMER PO NO: E HEBERT
CYLINDER NUMBER:
COMPONENT
JB03174
CONCENTRATION (v/v)
± EPA UNCERTAINTY
REFERENCE STANDARD
CYLINDER SIZE:
CYLINDER PRESSURE:
ANALYZER
MAKE. MODEL, S/N. DETECTION
Carbon monoxide 4.60 ± 0.07 ppm
5OA (52 std cu ft)
2000 psig
Ultra pure Air
Balance
GMIS SRM 2613a Carle Insts Model 8000
Samp#- 22-16-E Serial # 8249
Cyl#. CC101213 Cy!#: CLM09661 Methanation/FID
11.07 + o. 14 ppm 19.72 ± 0.25 ppm1 Gas Chromatography
Exp- 10/15/2021 Exp: 8/1/2017 LAST CAL DATE: 1/30/2014
CERTIFICATION DATE: January 31, 2014 EPA EXPIRATION DATE: February 1, 2022
REPLICATE
ANALYSIS DATA
1/24/2014 1/31/2014
4.6Q ppm1 4.58 ppm
4.56 ppm 4.61 ppm
4.60 ppm 4.60 ppm
* : 4.59 ppm. 4.60 ppm
ppm - pmole/mole % = mole-% x = EPA weighted mean
he aboue analyses were performed in accordance witft Procedure G1 of ine EPA Trace ability Protocol, Report Number EPA600/R-12/531. dated May 2012.
The above analyses should not be used if the cylinder pressure is less than 100 psig.
ANALYST: APPROVED:
M.J.Monson / J. T Marrin
STANDARD CALIBRATION GASES \ /_j\ -,JM c». \DERS
Tha only rftht,ocnnpany (orgas whlen taft* comply w,* ** analyslESnall replaMnm sr reanalysls 1her6o(by the C0mp3ny ^ ^ ^
-------
SCOTT-MARRIN, INC. ~r
6531 BOX SPRINGS BLVD. • RIVERSIDE, CA 92507
(951)653-6780 • FAX (95 1) 653-2430 • WWW.SCOTTMARRIN.COM
Report Of Analysis
EPA Protocol Gas Mixtures
EEMS01
TO: Env'l, Engineering & Measurement Svcs
Attn: Eric Hebert
8010 Southwest 17th Place
Gainesville, FL 32607
(352)262-0802
REPORT NO: 64679-02
REPORT DATE: April 7, 2014
CUSTOMER PO NO: E HEBERT
CYLINDER NUMBER:
Ipnl^cn
w i—. ug-Tw('J
CYLINDER SIZE: 50A (52 std CU ft)
CYLINDER PRESSURE: 2000 psig
COMPONENT
CONCENTRATION (v/v)
± EPA UNCERTAINTY
REFERENCE STANDARD
ANALYZER
MAKE, MODEL, S/N, DETECTION
REPLICATE
ANALYSIS DATA
Carbon monoxide 42.9 ± 0.3 ppm
Ultrapure Air Balance
CERTIFICATION OATS': March 21, 2014
Mai
GMIS SRM 1678c Carle Insts Model 8000
Samp# 4-6-1 Serial # 8249
Cyl# ALM021434 Cyl#. CLMQ0S356 Methanation/FID
56.2 ± 0.4 ppm 49.8 ± 0.35 ppmv Gas Chromatography
Exp 1/10/2021 Exp: 6/21/2015 LAST CAL DATE: 3/3/2014
EPA EXPIRATION DATE: March 22, 2022
3/14/2014
42.9 ppm
42.6 ppm
43.1 ppm
x : 42.9 ppm
3/21/2014
42.8 ppm
42.8 ppm
42.9 ppm
42.8 ppm
ppm - pmole/mole % - mole-% x - EPA weighted mean
The above analyses were performed in accordance with Procedure G1 of the EPA Traceability Protocol, Report Number EPA600/R-12/531, dated May 2012
The above analyses should not be used if the cylinder pressure is less than 100 psig.
ANALYST:
APPROVED:
M J Monson
Tha only liability of this company tor gas which fails to comply with this analysis shall be replacement or reanaiysls thereof by the company without extra cost
» J T Marrin
a • - . »_iEhAT(C'"» !__• _11 ; ¦ ;•=»=
-------
SCOTT-MARRIN, INC. T™d30r
6531 BOX SPRINGS BLVD. • RIVERSIDE, CA 92507
(95 11 653-6780 • FAX (951) 653-2430 • WWW.SCOTTMARRIN.COM
Report Of Analysis
EPA Protocol Gas Mixtures
TO:
EEMS01
Envl, Engineering & Measurement Svcs
Attn: Eric Hebert
8010 Southwest 17th Place
Gainesville, FL 32607
(352) 262-0802
REPORT NO: 64465-02
REPORT DATE: February 18, 2014
CUSTOMER PO NO: E HEBERT
CYLINDER NUMBER: JB03170
COMPONENT
CONCENTRATION (v/v)
± EPA UNCERTAINTY
REFERENCE STANDARD
CYLINDER SIZE:
CYLINDER PRESSURE:
ANALYZER
MAKE. MODEL, 5/N, DETECTION
Carbon monoxide 46.4 ± 0.3 pprn
Ultrapure Air Balance
CERTIFICATION DATE: January 31. 2014
GMIS
Cyl#: ALM021434
56.2 ± 0.4 ppm
Exp: 1/10/2021
50A (52 std cu ft)
2000 psig
SRM 1678c Carle Insts Model 8000
Samp#: 4-6-I Serial # 8249
Cyl#' CLM009356 Methanation/FID
49.8 + o 35 ppmv Gas Chromatography
Exp: 6/21/2015 LAST CAL DATE: 1/30/2014
EPA EXPIRATION DATE: February 1, 2022
REPLICATE
ANALYSIS DATA
1/24/2014 1/31/2014
46.4 ppm 46.3 ppm
46.3 ppm 46.6 ppm
46.2 ppm 46.5 ppm
* : 46.3 ppm 46.5 ppm
ppm = pmole/rnole % = mo,e.% ; = EpA wejghted megn
Tne above 3nalyses were perf0fmetj |n accordance wjlh Pfocedure Q1 q{ fhe EpA Traceab|(j(y PfotoCQ| Reparf Numbef EpA600/R.12/531 da[ed Mgy J012
e a ove analyses should not be used if the cylinder pressure is less than 100 psig.
ANALYST:
M J.Monson
APPROVED:
J. T Marrin
--''¦."VvV CYLINDERS
STANDARD CALIBRATION GASES Ifj
The onlyliability of this company lorgas isfiteH fails to Comply with thfs analysisedall be replacement or teanslysis thereof by the company without erfp ossi
-------
SCOTT-MARRIN, INC.
653 1 BOX SPRINGS BLVD. • RIVERSIDE, CA 92507
(951) 653-6780 • FAX (951)653-2430 • WWW.SCOTTMARRIN.COM
Report Of Analysis
NIST-Traceable Gas Mixtures
EEMS01
TO: Env'l, Engineering & Measurement Svcs
Attn: Eric Hebert
8010 Southwest 17th Place
Gainesville, FL 32607
(352) 262-0802
REPORT NO: 64715-01
REPORT DATE: April 14, 2014
CUSTOMER PO NO: E HEBERT
CYLINDER NUMBER: hfc503696
N1ST TRACEABLE
COMPONENT CONCENTRATION (v/v) REFERENCE STANDARD
n-Propylnitrate 5.02 ± 0.25 ppmv SRM 2627a
Nitrogen Balance
Cylinder Size; 30A (28 std cu ft)
Cylinder Pressure: 2000 psig
Shelf Life 12 months
ppm = umole/mole % = mole-%
The above analyses are traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology by intercomparison with the reference
standard listed herein. Where indicated, volumetric and gravimetric reference standards are traceable thru use of our analytical
balance. NIST Certificate Numbers 822/272801-6 and 822/274081-06
ANALYST:
t>.C
APPROVED:
D.C.Marrin
Marrtn
The only liability of this company for gas which fa'Is to comply with th s analysis si's ce rep *ce-ert or rear a .=-= "tre? c, care*'. * To-? s-va sost
STANDARD CALIBRATION GASES IN Au. C'- JNDE=tS
-------
FINAL SUMMARY AUDIT REPORT CO BASED
EE MS Van-2
Site Name: EPA R-7
Audit Date:
9/12/2016
Parameter
NPAP Lab Response
(ppm)
Station Response
(ppm)
Percent
Difference
Absolute
Difference
(ppm)
Pass/Fail Warning
Ozone
Pre Zero
Ozone Audit Point #1
Ozone Audit Point #2
Ozone Audit Point #3
Ozone Audit Point #4
Ozone Audit Point #5
Post Zero
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Carbon Monoxide
Pre Zero
CO Audit level 7
CO Audit level 6
CO Audit level 5
CO Audit level
CO Audit level
Post Zero
0.005
21.216
12.149
7.136
0.004
-0.0026
20.865
12.021
7.120
-0.0076
-0.3510
-0.1280
-0.0160
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
N/A
N/A
Pass
-1.7
-1.1
-0.2
0.0065
0.0025
Oxides of Nitrogen
Pre Zero
0.0001
0.0000
-0.0001
Pass
NO Audit Point #1
0.2134
0.2071
-3.0
-0.0063
Pass
NO Audit Point #2
0.1222
0.1192
-2.5
-0.0030
Pass
NO Audit Point #3
0.0718
0.0700
-2.5
-0.0018
Pass
NO Audit Point #4
N/A
NO Audit Point #5
N/A
Post Zero
0
-0.0001
0.0
Pass
Pre Zero
0.0001
0.0000
-0.0001
Pass
NOx Audit Point #1
0.2134
0.2069
-3.0
-0.0065
Pass
NOx Audit Point #2
0.1222
0.1191
-2.5
-0.0031
Pass
NOx Audit Point #3
0.0718
0.0701
-2.4
-0.0017
Pass
NOx Audit Point #4
N/A
NOx Audit Point #5
N/A
Post Zero
0.0000
0.0000
0.0
Pass
Pre Zero
0.0000
0.0000
0
N02 Audit level 7
0.1290
0.1253
-2.9
-0.0037
Pass
N02 Audit level 6
0.0750
0.0726
-3.2
-0.0024
Pass
N02 Audit level 5
0.0390
0.0373
-4.4
-0.0017
Pass
N02 Audit level
N/A
Post Zero
0.0000
0.0001
0.0
Converter Efficiency N02 level 7
99.9%
Pass
Converter Efficiency N02 level 6
99.7%
Pass
Converter Efficiency N02 level 5
99.2%
Pass
Converter Efficiency N02 level
N/A
Sulfur Dioxide
Pre Zero
S02 Audit level 8
S02 Audit level 7
S02 Audit level 6
S02 Audit level
S02 Audit level
Post Zero
0.0001
0.2159
0.1237
0.0726
0.0000
-0.0001
0.2152
0.1239
0.0728
-0.0001
-0.3
0.2
0.3
-0.0002
-0.0007
0.0002
0.0002
-0.0001
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
N/A
N/A
Pass
-------
FINAL SUMMARY AUDIT REPORT CO BASED
EEMS Van-2
Site Name: EPA R-7
Station Response
(ppm)
Percent
Difference
Absolute
Difference
(ppm)
Audit Date:
9/12/2016
Parameter
NPAP Lab Response
(ppm)
Pass/Fail
Warning
Ozone
Pre Zero
Ozone Audit Point #1
Ozone Audit Point #2
Ozone Audit Point #3
Ozone Audit Point #4
Ozone Audit Point #5
Post Zero
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Carbon Monoxide
Pre Zero
0.023
0.0009 |
-0.0221
Pass
CO Audit level 5
3.523
3.542
0.5
0.0191
Pass
CO Audit level 4
1.872
1.906
1.8
0.0340
Pass
CO Audit level 3
0.741
0.783
5.7
0.0420
Pass
CO Audit level 3
0.408
0.460
12.7
0.0517
Pass
Warning
CO Audit level 2
Post Zero
0.126
-0.045
0.171
35.7
0.0450
| 0.0430
Pass
Pass
Warning
-0.002 |
Pre Zero
0.0002
-0.0001
| -0.0003
Pass
NO Audit Point #1
0.0354
0.0352
-0.6
-0.0002
Pass
NO Audit Point #2
0.0188
0.0187
-0.5
-0.0001
Pass
NO Audit Point #3
0.0075
0.0075
0.0
0.0000
Pass
NO Audit Point #4
0.0041
0.0044
7.3
0.0003
Pass
NO Audit Point #5
0.0013
0.0015
15.4
0.0002
Pass
Post Zero
-0.0005
-0.0001
| 0.0004
Pass
Pre Zero
0.0002
-0.0001
| -0.0003
Pass
NOx Audit Point #1
0.0354
0.0350
-1.1
-0.0004
Pass
NOx Audit Point #2
0.0188
0.0186
-1.1
-0.0002
Pass
NOx Audit Point #3
0.0075
0.0075
0.0
0.0000
Pass
NOx Audit Point #4
0.0041
0.0043
4.9
0.0002
Pass
NOx Audit Point #5
0.0013
0.0015
15.4
0.0002
Pass
Post Zero
-0.0005
-0.0001
1 0.0004
Pass
Pre Zero
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
N02 Audit level 4
0.0180
0.0171
-5.0
-0.0009
Pass
N02 Audit level 3
0.0070
0.0064
-8.6
-0.0006
Pass
N02 Audit level 2
0.0030
0.0034
13.3
0.0004
Pass
N02 Audit level 1
0.0020
0.0017
-15.0
-0.0003
Pass
Post Zero
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Converter Efficiency N02 level 4
Converter Efficiency N02 level 3
Converter Efficiency N02 level 2
Converter Efficiency N02 level 1
99.4%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Sulfur Dioxide
Pre Zero
S02 Audit level 5
S02 Audit level 4
S02 Audit level 3
S02 Audit level 2
S02 Audit level 1
Post Zero
0.0002
0.0359
0.0191
0.0075
0.0042
0.0013
-0.0005
0.0000
0.0344
0.0183
0.0070
0.0040
0.0012
-0.0001
-4.2
-4.2
-6.7
-4.8
-7.7
-0.0002
-0.0015
-0.0008
-0.0005
-0.0002
-0.0001
0.0004
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
-------
FINAL SUMMARY AUDIT REPORT FLOW BASED
EEMS Van-2
Site Name: EPA R-7
Audit Date: 9/12/2016
Parameter
Ozone
Pre Zero
Ozone Audit Point #1
Ozone Audit Point #2
Ozone Audit Point #3
Ozone Audit Point #4
Ozone Audit Point #5
Post Zero
NPAP Lab
Response
(ppm)
Station Response
(ppm)
Percent
Difference
Absolute
Differenc Pass/Fail Warning
e (ppm)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Carbon Monoxide
Pre Zero
0.000
-0.0026 |
¦ -0.0026
Pass
CO Audit level 7
21.194
20.865
-1.6
-0.3291
Pass
CO Audit level 6
12.148
12.021
-1.0
-0.1270
Pass
CO Audit level 5
7.103
7.120
0.2
0.0173
Pass
CO Audit level
N/A
CO Audit level
N/A
Post Zero
0.000
0.0065 |
¦ 0.0065
Pass
Oxides of Nitrogen
Pre Zero
0.0000
0.0000 |
¦
Pass
NO Audit Point #1
0.2132
0.2071
-2.9
-0.0061
Pass
NO Audit Point #2
0.1222
0.1192
-2.5
-0.0030
Pass
NO Audit Point #3
0.0714
0.0700
-2.0
-0.0014
Pass
NO Audit Point #4
N/A
NO Audit Point #5
N/A
Post Zero
0.0000
-0.0001 |
¦ 0.0
Pass
Pre Zero
0.0000
0.0000 |
¦
Pass
NOx Audit Point #1
0.2132
0.2069
-3.0
-0.0063
Pass
NOx Audit Point #2
0.1222
0.1191
-2.5
-0.0031
Pass
NOx Audit Point #3
0.0714
0.0701
-1.8
-0.0013
Pass
NOx Audit Point #4
N/A
NOx Audit Point #5
N/A
Post Zero
0.0000
0.0000 |
¦ 0.0
Pass
Pre Zero
0.0000
0.0000 |
¦
N02 Audit level 7
0.1290
0.1253
-2.9
-0.0037
Pass
N02 Audit level 6
0.0750
0.0726
-3.2
-0.0024
Pass
N02 Audit level 5
0.0390
0.0373
-4.4
-0.0017
Pass
N02 Audit level
N/A
Post Zero
0.0000
0.0000 |
¦ 0.0
Converter Efficiency N02 level 7
99.9%
Pass
Converter Efficiency N02 level 6
99.7%
Pass
Converter Efficiency N02 level 5
Converter Efficiency N02 level
99.2%
Pass
N/A
Sulfur Dioxide
Pre Zero
S02 Audit level 8
S02 Audit level 7
S02 Audit level 6
S02 Audit level
S02 Audit level
Post Zero
0.0000
0.2157
0.1236
0.0723
0.0000
-0.0001
0.2152
0.1239
0.0728
-0.0001
-0.2
0.2
0.7
-0.0001
-0.0005
0.0003
0.0005
-0.0001
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
N/A
N/A
Pass
-------
FINAL SUMMARY AUDIT REPORT CO BASED
EEMS Van-2
Site Name: EPA R-7
Station Response
(ppm)
Percent
Difference
Absolute
Difference
(ppm)
Audit Date:
9/12/2016
Parameter
NPAP Lab Response
(ppm)
Pass/Fail
Warning
Ozone
Pre Zero
Ozone Audit Point #1
Ozone Audit Point #2
Ozone Audit Point #3
Ozone Audit Point #4
Ozone Audit Point #5
Post Zero
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Carbon Monoxide
Pre Zero
0.023
0.0009 |
-0.0221
Pass
CO Audit level 5
3.523
3.542
0.5
0.0191
Pass
CO Audit level 4
1.872
1.906
1.8
0.0340
Pass
CO Audit level 3
0.741
0.783
5.7
0.0420
Pass
CO Audit level 3
0.408
0.460
12.7
0.0517
Pass
Warning
CO Audit level 2
Post Zero
0.126
-0.045
0.171
35.7
0.0450
| 0.0430
Pass
Pass
Warning
-0.002 |
Pre Zero
0.0002
-0.0001
| -0.0003
Pass
NO Audit Point #1
0.0354
0.0352
-0.6
-0.0002
Pass
NO Audit Point #2
0.0188
0.0187
-0.5
-0.0001
Pass
NO Audit Point #3
0.0075
0.0075
0.0
0.0000
Pass
NO Audit Point #4
0.0041
0.0044
7.3
0.0003
Pass
NO Audit Point #5
0.0013
0.0015
15.4
0.0002
Pass
Post Zero
-0.0005
-0.0001
| 0.0004
Pass
Pre Zero
0.0002
-0.0001
| -0.0003
Pass
NOx Audit Point #1
0.0354
0.0350
-1.1
-0.0004
Pass
NOx Audit Point #2
0.0188
0.0186
-1.1
-0.0002
Pass
NOx Audit Point #3
0.0075
0.0075
0.0
0.0000
Pass
NOx Audit Point #4
0.0041
0.0043
4.9
0.0002
Pass
NOx Audit Point #5
0.0013
0.0015
15.4
0.0002
Pass
Post Zero
-0.0005
-0.0001
1 0.0004
Pass
Pre Zero
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
N02 Audit level 4
0.0180
0.0171
-5.0
-0.0009
Pass
N02 Audit level 3
0.0070
0.0064
-8.6
-0.0006
Pass
N02 Audit level 2
0.0030
0.0034
13.3
0.0004
Pass
N02 Audit level 1
0.0020
0.0017
-15.0
-0.0003
Pass
Post Zero
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Converter Efficiency N02 level 4
Converter Efficiency N02 level 3
Converter Efficiency N02 level 2
Converter Efficiency N02 level 1
99.4%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Sulfur Dioxide
Pre Zero
S02 Audit level 5
S02 Audit level 4
S02 Audit level 3
S02 Audit level 2
S02 Audit level 1
Post Zero
0.0002
0.0359
0.0191
0.0075
0.0042
0.0013
-0.0005
0.0000
0.0344
0.0183
0.0070
0.0040
0.0012
-0.0001
-4.2
-4.2
-6.7
-4.8
-7.7
-0.0002
-0.0015
-0.0008
-0.0005
-0.0002
-0.0001
0.0004
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
-------
FINAL SUMMARY AUDIT REPORT CO BASED
EEMS Van-1
Site Name: EPA R-7
Parameter
Audit Date:
9/14/2016
NPAP Lab Response
(ppm)
Station Response
(ppm)
Percent
Difference
Absolute
Difference
(ppm)
Pass/Fail Warning
Ozone
Pre Zero
Ozone Audit Point #1
N/A
Ozone Audit Point #2
N/A
Ozone Audit Point #3
N/A
Ozone Audit Point #4
N/A
Ozone Audit Point #5
N/A
Post Zero
Carbon Monoxide
Pre Zero
0.011 |
CO Audit level 5
4.339
N/A
CO Audit level 4
1.725
N/A
CO Audit level 3
0.719
N/A
CO Audit level 3
0.482
N/A
CO Audit level 2
0.192
N/A
Post Zero
-0.072 |
Pre Zero
0.0001
0.0000
| -0.0001
Pass
NO Audit Point #1
0.0449
0.0461
2.7
0.0012
Pass
NO Audit Point #2
0.0178
0.0179
0.6
0.0001
Pass
NO Audit Point #3
0.0074
0.0077
4.1
0.0003
Pass
NO Audit Point #4
0.0050
0.0055
10.0
0.0005
Pass
NO Audit Point #5
0.0020
0.0027
35.0
0.0007
Pass
Post Zero
-0.0007
0.0000
| 0.0007
Pass
Pre Zero
0.0001
0.0000
| -0.0001
Pass
NOx Audit Point #1
0.0449
0.0461
2.7
0.0012
Pass
NOx Audit Point #2
0.0178
0.0179
0.6
0.0001
Pass
NOx Audit Point #3
0.0074
0.0078
5.4
0.0004
Pass
NOx Audit Point #4
0.0050
0.0056
12.0
0.0006
Pass
NOx Audit Point #5
0.0020
0.0027
35.0
0.0007
Pass
Post Zero
-0.0007
0.0001
1 0.0008
Pass
Pre Zero
0.0000
0.0001
0.0001
N02 Audit level 4
0.0110
0.0107
-2.7
-0.0003
Pass
N02 Audit level 3
0.0070
0.0072
2.9
0.0002
Pass
N02 Audit level 2
0.0030
0.0031
3.3
0.0001
Pass
N02 Audit level 1
0.0010
0.0016
60.0
0.0006
Pass
Post Zero
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Converter Efficiency N02 level 4
Converter Efficiency N02 level 3
Converter Efficiency N02 level 2
Converter Efficiency N02 level 1
98.2%
101.3%
100.0%
100.0%
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Sulfur Dioxide
Pre Zero
S02 Audit level 5
S02 Audit level 4
S02 Audit level 3
S02 Audit level 2
S02 Audit level 1
Post Zero
0.0001
0.0439
0.0174
0.0073
0.0049
0.0019
-0.0007
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-------
FINAL SUMMARY AUDIT REPORT CO BASED
EEMS Van-1
Site Name: EPA R-7
Audit Date:
9/15/2016
Parameter
NPAP Lab Response
(ppm)
Station Response
(ppm)
Percent
Difference
Absolute
Difference
(ppm)
Pass/Fail Warning
Ozone
Pre Zero
Ozone Audit Point #1
Ozone Audit Point #2
Ozone Audit Point #3
Ozone Audit Point #4
Ozone Audit Point #5
Post Zero
Converter Efficiency N02 level 3
Converter Efficiency N02 level 2
Converter Efficiency N02 level 1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Carbon Monoxide
Pre Zero
0.005
0.0045 |
CO Audit level 5
4.324
4.343
CO Audit level 4
1.703
1.734
CO Audit level 3
0.648
0.676
CO Audit level 3
0.428
0.445
CO Audit level 2
0.163
0.180
Post Zero
-0.015
0.019 |
Oxides of Nitrogen
Pre Zero
0.0001
NO Audit Point #1
0.0447
NO Audit Point #2
0.0176
NO Audit Point #3
0.0067
NO Audit Point #4
0.0044
NO Audit Point #5
0.0017
Post Zero
-0.0002
Pre Zero
0.0001
NOx Audit Point #1
0.0447
NOx Audit Point #2
0.0176
NOx Audit Point #3
0.0067
NOx Audit Point #4
0.0044
NOx Audit Point #5
0.0017
Post Zero
-0.0002
Pre Zero
0.0000
N02 Audit level 4
N02 Audit level 3
N02 Audit level 2
N02 Audit level 1
Post Zero
0.0000
Converter Efficiency N02 level 4
0.4
1.8
4.3
4.0
10.4
-0.0005
Pass
0.0190
Pass
0.0310
Pass
0.0280
Pass
0.0170
Pass
0.0170
Pass
| 0.0340
Pass
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Sulfur Dioxide
Pre Zero
0.0001
0.0000
-0.0001
Pass
S02 Audit level 5
0.0437
0.0415
-5.0
-0.0022
Pass
S02 Audit level 4
0.0172
0.0162
-5.8
-0.0010
Pass
S02 Audit level 3
0.0066
0.0050
-24.2
-0.0016
Pass
S02 Audit level 2
0.0043
0.0032
-25.6
-0.0011
Pass
S02 Audit level 1
0.0016
0.0011
-31.3
-0.0005
Pass
Post Zero
-0.0001
-0.0001
0.0000
Pass
Warning
-------
~
MesaLabs
I o-C 2-
ow(l&sj
NVLAP Lab Code 200661-0
Calibration Certificate
CertificateNo. 65904
Sold To:
Product
Serial No.
Cal. Date
200-220H Definer 220 High Flow
' 17-Dec-2015 N
/mS
OIH7
Environmental Engineering & Measurement
Services
8010 SW 17th Place
Gainesville, FL 32607
US
Ail calibrations are performed at Mesa Laboratories, Inc., 10 Park Place, Butler, NJ, 07405, an ISO 17025:2005 accredited laboratory
through NVLAP of NIST, This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of the laboratory. Results only
relate to the items calibrated. This report must not be used to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or
any agency of the Federal Government.
As Received Calibration Data
Technician
Instrument Reading
25183 seem
5004.9 seem
1500.2 seem
22,1 °C
751 mmHg
Ulfanna Malinowska
Lab Standard Reading
25056 seem
5000 .7 seem
1500,45 seem
22.5 °C
751 mmHg
Deviation
0.51%
0.08%
-0.02%
Mesa Laboratories Standards Used
Lab. Pressure
Lab. Temperature
751 mmHg
22.6 °C
Allowable Deviation
1.00%
1.00%
1.00%
± 0.8°C
± 3.5 mmHg
As Received
In Tolerance
In Tolerance
In tolerance
In Tolerance
In Tolerance
Description
ML-800-44
Percision Thermometer
Precision Barometer
Standard Serial Number
101897
305460
2981392
Calibration Date
29-Nov-2015
21-Sep-2015
28-J un-2015
Calibration Due Date
28-Nov-2016
20-Sep-2016
27-Jun-2016
q(0f
ud"
r1
f. oc? £{& 4^
-0.
i OOG$C
Mesa Laboratories Inc. 10 Park Place Butler NJ 07405 USA
(973) 492-8400 FAX (973) 492-8270 www.mesalabs.com Symbol "MLAB"on the NAS
1 2 CALQ2-S3 Kev '3C5
-------
~
MesaLabs
As Shipped Calibration Data
h
z o
£ 1
DWl^i
NVLAP Lab Code 200661-0
Certificate No
Technician
Instrument Reading
25234 seem
5030.7 seem
1510.4 seem
22.6 °C
747 mmHg
65904
Liltanna Malinowska
Lab Standard Reading
25101.5sccm
5001.2 seem
1501.6 seem
22.6 °C
747 mmHg
Lab. Pressure
Lab. Temperature
747 mmHg
22 6 X
Deviation
0.53%
0.59%
0.59%
Allowable Deviation
1.00%
1.00%
1.00%
± 0.8°C
± 3.5 mm'Hg
As Shipped
In Tolerance
In Tolerance
In Tolerance
In Tolerance
In Tolerance
Mesa Laboratories Standards Used
Description
ML-800-44
Percision Thermometer
Precision Barometer
Standard Serial Number
101897
305460
2981392
Calibration Date
29-NOV-2015
21-Sep-2G15
28-Jun-2015
Calibration Due Date
28-NOV-2016
20-Sep-2016
27-Jun-2016
Calibration Notes
The expanded uncertainty of flow, temperature, and pressure measurements all have a coverage factor of k = 2 for a confidence
interval of approximately 95%.
Flow testing is in accordance with our test number PR18-13 with an expanded uncertainty of 0.18% using high-purity nitrogen or
filtered laboratory air. Flow readings in seem are performed at STP of 21.1 °C and 760 mmHg.
Pressure testing is in accordance with our test number PR18-11 with an expanded uncertainty of 0.16 mmHg.
Temperature testing is in accordance with our test number PR18-12 with an expanded uncertainty of 0 04 °C,
Traceability to the International System of Units (SI) is verified by accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025 by NVLAP under NVLAP Code
200661-0.
Technician Notes:
Louis Guido, Chief Metrologist
2 of 2
Mesa Laboratories Inc. 10 Park Place Butler, NJ 07405 USA
(973) 492-8400 FAX (973) 492-8270 www.mesalabs.com Symbol "MLA8"on the NAS
CA_::-i£ =r. g>:~
-------
~
MesaLabs
mm
NVLAP Lab Code 200661-0
Calibration Certificate
CertificateNo. 76160
Sold To:
Product
Serial No.
Cat. Date
200-220H Definer 220 High Flow
122974
10-Feb-2016
L>.
0
Environmental Engineering & Measurement
Services
8010 SW 17th Place
Gainesville, FL 32607
US
All calibrations are performed at Mesa Laboratories, Inc., 10 Park Place, Butler, NJ, 07405, an ISO 17025:2005 accredited laboratory
through NVLAP of NIST, This report shall not be reproduced except In full without the written approval of the laboratory. Results only
relate to the items calibrated. This report must not be used to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or
any agency of the Federal Government.
As Received Calibration Data
Technician
Instrument Reading
seem
seem
seem
»C
mmHg
Lab Standard Reading
seem
seem
seem
=C
mmHg
Deviation
Lab. Pressure mmHg
Lab.Temperature 21.8 °C
Allowable Deviation
1.00%
1.00%
1.00%
± 0 8°C
± 3.5 mmHg
As Received
In Tolerance
In Tolerance
Mesa Laboratories Standards Used
Description
Percision Thermometer
Precision Barometer
Standard Serial Number
Calibration Date
rC
Calibration Due Date
t m s c\m&
1 of 2
Mesa Laboratories Inc. 10 Park Place Butler, NJ 07405 USA
(973) 492-8400 FAX (973) 492-8270 www.mesalabs.com Symbol "MLAB" on the NAS
CAL02-48 Rev G05
-------
~
MesaLabs
As Shipped Calibration Data
s
o\^iu
I to/^
imm
N\JLAP Lab Code 200661-0
Certificate No
Technician
Instrument Reading
25171 seem
5012.3 seem
1507.6 seem
21.8 "C
748 mmHg
76160
Liiianna Malinowska
Lab Standard Reading
25186.5sccm
5000.3 seem
1501.95 seem
21.8 °C
748 mmHg
Deviation
-0.06%
0.24%
0.38%
Lab. Pressure 748 mmHg
Lab. Temperature 21.8 °C
Allowable Deviation
1.00%
1.00%
1.00%
± 0 83C
± 3.5 mmHg
-f
As Shipped
tn Tolerance
in Tolerance
in Tolerance
In Tolerance
In Tolerance
Mesa Laboratories Standards Used
Description
M1-800-44
Percision Thermometer
Precision Barometer
Calibration Notes
Standard Serial Number
101897
305460
2981392
Calibration Date
29-Nov-2015
21-Sep-2015
28-Jun-2015
Calibration Due Date
28-Nov-2016
20-Sep-2016
27-Jun-2016
The expanded uncertainty of flow, temperature, and pressure measurements all have a coverage factor of k = 2 for a confidence
interval of approximately 95%.
Flow testing is in accordance with our test number PR18-13 with an expanded uncertainty of 0.18% using high-purity nitrogen or
filtered laboratory air Flow readings in seem are performed at STP of 21.1 °C and 760 mmHg.
Pressure testing is in accordance with our test number PR 18-11 with an expanded uncertainty of 0.16 mmHg.
Temperature testing is in accordance with our test number PR18-12 with an expanded uncertainty of 0.04 DC.
Traceability to the International System of Units (SI) is verified by accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025 by NVLAP under NVLAP Code
200661-0
Technician Notes:
Louis Guido, Chief Metrologist
2 of 2
Mesa Laboratories Inc. 10 Park Place Buller. NJ 07405 USA
(973) 492-8400 FAX (973) 492-8270 www. mesa la bs.com Symbol "MLAB" on the NAS
CAL02-48 Rev G05
-------
~
MesaLabs
DWd^J
NVLAP Lab Code 200661-0
Calibration Certificate
CertificateNo. 76161
Product 200-220L Definer 220 Low Flow
Serial No.
Cal. Date
12C910 .
10-Feb-201£
Sold To:
1btr
%
I O'
£
Environmental Engineering & Measurement
Services
SOtOSW 17th Place
Gainesville, Ft 32607
US
All calibrations are performed at Mesa Laboratories. Inc., 10 Park Place. Butler, NJ, 07405, an ISO 17025:2005 accredited laboratory
through NVLAP of NIST. This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of the laboratory. Results only
relate to the items calibrated. This report must not be used to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or
any agency of the Federal Government
As Received Calibration Data
Technician
Instrument Reading
484.74 seem
108.09 seem
33.41 seem
20.2 °C
746 mmHg
Lilianna Malinowska
Lab Standard Reading
480,43 seem
107.98 seem
33 18 seem
20 5 °C
760 mmHg
Deviation
0.9%
0.1%
0.69%
Lab. Pressure
Lab. Temperature
747 mmHg
21.5 °C
Allowable Deviation
1,00%
1,00%
1,00%
£ 0.8aC
± 3.5 mmHg
As Received
In Tolerance
In Tolerance
In tolerance
In Tolerance
In Tolerance
Mesa Laboratories Standards Used
Description
ML-800-10
Percision Thermometer
Precision Barometer
Standard Sena! Number
103743
305460
2981392
Calibration Date
07-Apr-2015
21-Sep*2015
28-Jun-2015
Calibration Due Date
06-Apr-2016
20-Sep-2016
27-Jun-2016
1 of 2
Mesa Laboratories Inc. 10 Park Place Butler, NJ 07405 LISA
(973) 492-8400 FAX (973) 492-8270 www.mesalabs.com Symbol "MLAB" on the MAS
CAL02-48 Rev G05
-------
~
MesaLabs
As Shipped Calibration Data
Certificate No
Technician
Instrument Reading
451 16 seem
100.37 seem
30.741 seem
21.5 °C
748 mmHg
76161
Ulianna Maiinowska
Lab Standard Reading
450.215sccm
100.415 seem
30.6215 seem
21.5 °C
748 mmHg
2.(id zo<(&
2. e4
NVLAP Lab Code 200661-0
Lab. Pressure
Lab. Temperature
748 mmHg
21.5 °C
Deviation
0.21%
-0.04%
0.39%
Allowable Deviation
1.00%
1 00%
1.00%
± 0.8°C
± 3.5 mmHg
As Shipped
in Tolerance
in Tolerance
In Tolerance
in Tolerance
In Tolerance
Mesa Laboratories Standards Used
Description
ML-800-10
Pereision Thermometer
Precision Barometer
Calibration Notes
Standard Serial Number
103743
305460
2981392
Calibration Date
07-Apr-2015
21-Sep-2015
28-Jun-2015
Calibration Due Date
Q6-Apr-2016
20-Sep-2016
27-Jun-2016
The expanded uncertainty of flow, temperature, and pressure measurements all have a coverage factor of k = 2 for a confidence
interval of approximately 95%.
Flow testing is in accordance with our test number PR18-13 with an expanded uncertainty of 0,18% using high-purity nitrogen or
filtered laboratory air Flow readings in seem are performed at STP of 21 1°C and 760 mmHg.
Pressure testing is in accordance with our test number PR 18-11 with an expanded uncertainty of 0.16 mmHg
Temperature testing is in accordance with our test number PR18-12 with an expanded uncertainty of 0.04 °C.
Traceability to the International System of Units (SI) is verified by accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025 by NVLAP under NVLAP Code
200661-0.
Technician Notes:
Louis Guido, Chief Metrologist
2 of 2
Mesa Laboratories Inc. 10 Park Place Butler, NJ 07405 USA
(973) 492-8400 FAX (973) 492-8270 www,mesalabs.com Symbol "MLAB" on the NAS
CAL02-48 Rev G05
-------
Project:
Project #:
Contact Name:
Contact Phone #:
Contact Address:
Bios NEXUS EEMS # 01420/01410 Certification
Flow Rate Standard:
EEMS#
Certification Date:
Certification #:
slope =
inter =
BIOS Definer 220-H
01416
2/10/2016
76160
0.998946
0.011852
2/28/2016 Flow rates are corrected to STP of one atmosphere and 25.0 degrees C. were plumbed together in series.
All tests were conducted with dry air. Nexus #1420, Definer 220-H EEMS# 01416
UNADJUSTED: BIOS Nexus, EEMS #01420/01410
Flow Rate Standard—Definer 220-H
01420 / 01410
Slope = 0.990909
Intercept = 0.031721
Correl = 0.99988
Temp
degC
Press
mmHg
Definer
21.2
765
NEXUS
20.5
764
SL/m: standard liters per minute
Raw Readings (Each set for 10 reading sets)
Target Definer Ne>
1
0.932
0.936
0.931
0.936
0.932
0.935
0.931
0.933
Definer
Nexus
1.2
1.131
1.128
1.130
1.122
1.122
1.138
1.127
1.134
Definer
Nexus
1.5
1.418
1.438
1.419
1.432
1.418
1.430
1.424
1.432
Definer 220-H
9100
NEXUS/DC-LITE
STP SL/M
reading
Diff
% Diff
Corrected
Flow
SL/m
X
SL/m
Y
Y-X
(Y - X)/X
0.921
0.935
0.014
1.6%
1.117
1.131
0.014
1.2%
1.41
1.43
0.024
1.7%
1.92
1.96
0.036
1.9%
2.93
2.93
0.000
0.0%
3.43
3.43
-0.005
-0.1%
Average Error (SL/m) -
0.014
Confirmation
Test at 1.60 set point using
NEXUS/DC-LITE only (Y)
Definer only (X)
R1
R2
R1
R2
1.530
1.528
1.52
1.522
Average
1.529
Average
1.5210
Nexus corrected Value
1.511
corr -
1.511
Difffrom Define rvalue (X)
0.02%
Test at 3.00 set point using
NEXUS/DC-LITE only (Y)
Definer only (X)
R1
R2
R1
R2
2.93
2.925
2.9317
2.9296
Average
2.928
Average
2.9307
Nexus corrected Value
2.922
corr -
2.922
Difffrom Definer value (X)
0.02%
Definer Nexus
1.933 1.963
1.934 1.948
1.932 1.964
1.933 1.961
Definer Nexus
2.9373 2.929
2.9429 2.931
2.9354 2.936
2.9424 2.928
Definer Nexus
3.447 3.425
3.436 3.433
3.441 3.433
3.447 3.427
environmental, engineering
& measurement services
NEXUS / DC_LITE Corrected Values
(using slope and intercept)
SL/m
Diff
% Diff
0.911
-0.009
-1.0%
1.109
-0.008
-0.7%
1.414
0.005
0.4%
1.945
0.022
1.1%
2.926
-0.005
-0.2%
3.429
-0.005
-0.2%
Average
Error (Sl/m) 0.001
-------
~
MesaLabs
*0/4(7
m/h&Q5
NVLAP Lab Code 200661-0
CertificateNo, 89109
Product 200-220H Definer220 High Flow
Serial No. 131818
Cal. Date 20-APr-20ie
Calibration Certificate
Sold To:
Environmental Engineering & Measurement
Services
8010 SW 17th Place
Gainesville, FL 3260?
US
All calibrations are performed at Mesa Laboratories, Inc., 10 Park Place. Butler, NJ, 07405, an ISO 17025:2005 accredited laboratory
through NVLAP of N 1ST. This report shall not be reproduced except In full without the written approval of the laboratory. Results only
relate to the items calibrated. This report must not be used to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or
any agency of the Federal Government.
As Received Calibration Data
Technician
Instrument Reading
27096 2 seem
5424,64 seem
1558.26 seem
21 3 "C
752 mmHg
Lilianna Malinowsfca
Lab Standard Reading
26484.73 seem
5312,97 seem
1622,86 seem
22.5 °C
751 mmHg
Deviation
2.31%
2.1%
2 18%
Lab. Pressure
Lab. Temperature
752 mmHg
22 2 °C
Allowable Deviation
1.00%
1.00%
1.00%
± 0.8°C
±35 mmHg
As Received
Out of Tolerance
Out of Tolerance
Out of Tolerance
Out of Tolerance
In Tolerance
Mesa Laboratories Standards Used
Description
ML-800-44
Percision Thermometer
Precision Barometer
Standard Serial Number
103521
305460
2981392
Calibration Date
24-jun-2015
22-Sep-2015
29-Jun-2015
Calibration Due Date
23-Jun-2016
21-Sep-2016
28-Jun-2016
Mesa Laboratories Inc. 10 Park Place Butler, NJ 07405 USA
(973) 492-8400 FAX (973) 492-3270 www.mesalabs.com Symbol JMLAB' on the NAS
1 of 2 CAL02-48 Rev G05
-------
~
MesaLabs
IWLAP Lab Code 200661-0
As Shipped Calibration Data
Certificate No
Technician
Instrument Reading
26532.5 seem
5325.16 seem
1632.29 seem
21.7 °C
756 mmHg
89109
Lilianna Malinowska
Lab Standard Reading
26441 .Ssccm
5307.04 seem
1623.96 seem
21.7 °C
756 mmHg
Lab. Pressure
Lab. Temperature
756 mmHg
22.2 "C
Deviation
0.34%
0.34%
0.51%
Allowable Deviation
1.00%
1.00%
1.00%
± 0 8°C
± 3.5 mmHg
As Shipped
In Tolerance
In Tolerance
In Tolerance
In Tolerance
In Tolerance
Mesa Laboratories Standards Used
Description
ML-800-44
Percision Thermometer
Precision Barometer
Calibration Notes
Standard Serial Number
101897
305460
2981392
Calibration Date
29-NOV-2015
21-Sep-2015
28-Jun-2015
Calibration Due Date
28-NOV-2016
20-Sep-2016
27-Jun-2016
The expanded uncertainly of flow, temperature, and pressure measurements all have a coverage factor of k = 2 for a confidence
Interval of approximately 95%
Flow testing is in accordance with our test number PR18-13 with an expanded uncertainty of 0.18% using high-purity nitrogen or
filtered laboratory air Fiow readings in seem are performed at STP of 21 1°C and 760 mmHg.
Pressure testing is in accordance with our test number PR18-11 with an expanded uncertainty of 0.16 mmHg.
Temperature testing is in accordance with our test number PR18-12 with an expanded uncertainty of 0,04 °C
Traceability to the International System of Units (SI) is verified by accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025 by NVLAP under NVLAP Code
200661-0.
Technician Notes:
Louis Guido, Chief Metrologist
2 of 2
Mesa Laboratories Inc. 10 Park Place Butler, NJ 07405 USA
(973) 492-S400 FAX (973) 492-8270 www.mesalabs.com Symbol "MLAB" on the NAS
CAL02-4S Rev GOS
-------
~
MesaLabs
ttOlHl!
NVLAP Lab Code 200661-0
CertificateNo. 85366
Calibration Certificate
Sold To:
Product 200-220H Definer220 High Flow
Serial No. 148613
Cal. Date 16-Mar-2016
Sales Date 21-Apr-2016 Calibration interval commences on sale date.
Environmental Engineering & Measurement
Services
8010 SW 17th Place
Gainesvitle, FL 32607
US
All calibrations are performed at Mesa Laboratories, Inc., 10 Park Place, Butler. NJL 07405, an ISO 17025:2005 accredited laboratory-
through NVLAP of NIST. This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of the laboratory. Results only
relate to the items calibrated. Th
-------
~
MesaLabs
EE MS
# owl
\mm
NVLAP Lab Code 200661-0
CertificateNo. 87566
Calibration Certificate
Sold To:
Product 200-220L Definer 220 Low Ftow
Serial No. 143737
Cat. Date 22-Mar-2oie
Sales Date 21-Apr-2016 Calibration interval commences on sale date.
Environmental Engineering & Measurement
Services
6010 SW 17th Place
Gainesville, FL 32607
US
All calibrations are performed at Mesa Laboratories, Inc., 10 Park Place, Butler, NJ. 07405, an ISO 17025:2005 accredited laboratory
through NVLAP of NIST. This report shall not be reproduced except In full without the written approval of the laboratory. Results only
relate to the items calibrated. This report must not be used to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, IMIST, or
any agency of the Federal Government,
Calibration Data
Certificate No
Technician
87566
Lilianna Malinowska
Lab, Pressure
Lab. Temperature
751 mmHg
21.9 °C
Instrument Reading
Lab Standard Reading
Deviation
Allowable Deviation
As Shipped
480.14 ccm
480.12 ccm
0.0%
1.00%
In Tolerance
107.89 ccm
107.98 ccm
-0.08%
1.00%
In Tolerance
33.13 ccm
33.2 ccm
-0.21%
1.00%
In Tolerance
21.5 "C
21 5 *C
-
± 0 8°C
In Tolerance
749 mmHg
749 mmHg
-
± 3.5 mmHg
In Tolerance
Mesa Laboratories Standards Used
Description
ML_80Q_10
Percision Thermometer
Precision Barometer
Standard Serial Number
103743
305460
2981392
Calibration Date
07-Apr-2015
21-Sep-2015
28-Jun-2015
Calibration Due Date
06-Apr-2016
20-Sep-2016
27-Jun-2016
1 of 2
Mesa Laboratories Inc. 10 Park Place Butler, NJ 07405 USA
(973) 492-8400 FAX (973) 492-8270 www.mesalabs.corn Symbol "MLAB" on the NAS
CAL02-40 Rev COS
-------
Q
Mesa <.abs
NVLAP Lab Code 200661-0
Calibration Notes
The expanded uncertainty of flow, temperature, and pressure measurements all have a coverage factor of k = 2 for a confidence
interval of approximately 95%.
Flow testing is in accordance with our test number PR18-13 with an expanded uncertainty of 0,18% using high-purity nitrogen or
filtered laboratory air Flow readings in seem are performed at STP of 21.TC and 760 mmHg.
Pressure testing is in accordance with our test number PR18-11 with an expanded uncertainty of 0.16 mmHg.
Temperature testing is in accordance with our test number PR18-12 with an expanded uncertainty of 0,04 °C.
Traceability to the International System of Units (SI) is verified by accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025 by NVLAP under NVLAP Code
200661-0.
Technician Notes:
Louis Guido, Chief Metrologist
2 of 2
Mesa Laboratories Inc. 10 Park Place Butler, NJ 07405 USA
(973) 492-8400 FAX (973) 492-3270 www mesaiabs.com Symbol "MLAB" on the NAS
CAL02-40 Rev COS
-------
4/21/2016 01421
DATA FROM MESA LABS
test raw test corr
220
1.62887
5.32513
26.5409
std
1.62494
5.31246
26.46127
4.0839
6.0814
9.1051
12.089
4.07
6.06
9.08
12.05
% diff
01421-01417
-0.83%
-0.59%
-0.60%
-0.66%
slope
inter
1.003088
-0.00231
4/20/2016 01417 DATA FROM MESA LABS test raw test corr
220 std
1.63229 1.62396 4.1229 4.11
5.32516 5.30704 6.1229 6.10
26.5325 26.4415 9.1659 9.13
12.176 12.13
slope 1.003371
inter 0.001647
-------
NVLAP Lab Code 200348-0
FLUKE
1 Calibration
Certificate of Calibration
Fluke Calibration, American Fork
Primary Temperature Laboratory
Description:
Digital Thermometer with Probe
Manufacturer:
Fluke
Model:
1551A
Serial Number:
3275143
Status:
As-Found: New
As-Left: In Tolerance
Calibration:
Full
Procedure:
AFC124 - 001
Customer:
FOTRONIC CORPORATION
MELROSE MA
PO Number-
0203284
Certificate Number:
Date of Calibration
Date Due:
Temperature:
Relative Humidity:
Pressure:
Issue Date:
BSC
09 Dec 2015
21.0 to 25.0 °C
15 to 60 %RH
83.5 to 88.5 kPa
18 Dec 2015
I
This(calibration is traceable to the SI through recognized national measurement institutes ratiometric techniaues
Lr P ySlf3f
-------
Certificate of Calibration
Model: 1551A
Serial No.: 3275143
Certificate No: B5C18007
-As Found Data
2-
No As Found Data Required
o\*
\ O
J q o £0 (9 ^ ^ *2_
_ Q £?&
17-/^ | z°y<>
As Left Data
Data ID: B5343072143703
Calibration Constants
R0
100.003539
A
3.917265E-03
8
-6.408775E-07
C
•1.292775E-11
MINOP
-60
MAXQP
170
Nominal CC) Actual (°C) Measured (X) Error (X) Tolerance (X)
Pass/Fail
-50
-49.9886
-49.9898
-0.0012
±0,0500
±0.0080
P
-25
-25.0848
-25.0911
¦0.0063
±0,0500
±0.0080
P
0
-0.0078
-0.0070
0.0008
±0.0500
±0.0080
P
100
100.0117
100.0118
0.0001
±0.0500
±0.0080
P
157
156.9983
156.9973
-0.0010
±0.0500
±0.0080
P
Name
Reference
Offset
Device Calibration Constants
DEVICE CAL 1
50.0080
0.0882
DEVICE CAL 2
100.0020
0.0760
DEVICE CAL 3
150.0070
0.0652
DEVICE CAL 4
200.0000
0,0598
User Calibration Constants
USER CAL1
-50.0000
0.0000
USER CAL 2
0.0000
0.0000
USER CAL 3
157.0000
0.0000
This report shall not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Fluke Calibration American Fork Pace 3 of 3
-------
Certificate Number
A2062999
Issue Date: 12/23/15
Certificate of
Page 1 of 2
Customer: ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING & MEASUREMENT SERVICES
1128 NW39TH DRIVE P.O. Number:
GAINESVILLE, FL 32605 ID Number:. 01226
FEDEX •
Description: DIGITAL STIK THERMOMETER
Manufacturer: FLUKE
Model Number: 1551A EX
Serial Number: 2085085
Technician: JEFF BAHMANN
On-Site Calibration: ~
Comments:
Calibration Date:
Calibration Due:
Procedure:
Temperature:
Humidity:
(i
\
12/23/2015 „
12/23/2016
FLUKE 1551A EX.52A EX
Rev: 11/1/2010
70 F
40 % RH
As Found Condition: IN TOLERANCE
Calibration Results: IN TOLERANCE
Limiting Attribute:
This instrument has been calibrated using standards traceable to the National institute of Standards and Technology, derived from natural physical constants, ratio
measurements or compared to consensus standards. Unless otherwise noted, the method of calibration is direct comparison to a known standard.
Reported uncertainties and "test uncertainty ratios" (TLIR's) are expressed as expanded uncertainty values at approximately 95% confidence level using a coverage
factor of K=2, A TUR of 4:1 Is routinely observed unless otherwise noted on the certificate. Statements of compliance are based on test results falling within specified
limits with no reduction by the uncertainty of the measurement.
TMI's Quality System is accredited to ISO/EC 17025 and ANSt/NCSL Z540-1 by A2LA. I50/IEC17025 is written in a language relevant to laboratory operations,
meeting the principles of ISO 9001 and aligned with its pertinent requirements The Instrument listed on this certificate has been calibrated to the requirements of
ANSl/NCSL Z540-1 and TMI's Quality Manual, GM-1.
Results contained in this document relate only to the item calibrated. Calibration due dates appearing on the certificate or label are determined by the client for
administrative purposes and do not imply continued conformance to specifications.
This certificate shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written permission of Technical Maintenance, Inc
FRANK BAHMANN, BRANCH MANAGER
J
JACK SHULER, QUALITY MANAGER
Asset Number
30946
Manufacturer
FLUKE
Calibration Standards
Model Number
5616
Date Calibrated
9/8/2014
Cal Due
2/25/2016
A06118
HART SCIENTIFIC
9103
1/13/2015
5/13/2016
A11967
HART SCIENTIFIC
9140
10/29/2014
6/27/2016
A88072
FLUKE/HART
1502A
11/23/2015
3/5/2016
Rev. 8
6/30 15
Technical Maintenance, Inc.
12530 TELECOM DRIVE, TEMPLE TERRACE, FL 33637
Phone: 813-978-3054 Fax 813-976-3758
www.tmicalibration.com
ANSl/NCSL Z540-1-1994
-------
Certificate Number
A2062999
Issue Date: 12/23/15
Certificate of Calibration
Data Sheet
Parameter
Nominal
Minimum
Maximum
As Found
As Left
Unit
Temperature Accuracy
-25,00
-25 05
-24.95
-25,02
-25.02
•c
Temperature Accuracy
0.00
-0,05
0.05
0.05
0.05
°c
Temperature Accuracy
100 00
09 95
100 05
99 96
99.96
°c
Temperature Accuracy
150 00
149.95
150.05
149 95
149.95
°c
Page 2 of 2
Unit ADJ/FAIL
\T-
f -
c£C>^H7.
p,
T
Mi
Technical Maintenance, Inc.
ANSl/NCSL Z540-1-1994
12530 TELECOM DRIVE, TEMPLE TERRACE, FL 33637
Rev 8 Phone: 813-978-3054 Fax 813-978-3758
6/30/15 www.tmicalibration.com
-------
Date
1/19/2016 - - Calibration and verification of three RTD meters with most recent certification of EEMS RTD
TMI Data
- 12/23/2015
RTD
RTD
RTD
At
Date 01230 / 01231
01227
01228
TMI
EEMS
EEMS
1/19/2016
EEMS
EEMS
EEMS
STD
RTD
RTD
AER
SEG
van1
cert date=
12/23/2015
01226
(van 2)
01226
diff
corrected
raw
corrected
raw
corrected
raw
corrected
raw
corrected
-25.00
-25.02
0.020
-25.035
0.02
0.01
0.03
0.00
0.02
0.00
#DIV/0!
0.00
0.05
-0.050
0.044
15.51
15.51
15.53
15.52
15.59
15.53
#DIV/0!
100.00
99.96
0.040
99.991
28.73
28.73
28.75
28.75
28.85
28.75
#DIV/0!
150.00
149.95
0.050
150.000
41.44
41.45
41.44
41.45
41.58
41.44
#DIV/0!
0.000
-0.006
51.08
51.09
51.06
51.08
51.25
51.09
#DIV/0!
0.000
-0.006
RTD 01226
2016 correction:
slope=
0.9996275
intercept=
0.0059542
0.9999999
slope =
0.999048
1.00279
#DIV/0!
1/19/2016
intercept =
0.027816
0.021429
#DIV/0!
correlation =
1.0000
1.0000
#DIV/0!
RTD
01229
EEMS
van1
raw
0.01
15.51
28.73
41.44
51.08
;orrected
0.04
15.54
28.76
41.48
51.12
0.9998
-0.0284
1.0000
-------
Date
1/10/2016 - - Calibration and verification of three thermocouples and fluke meters with most recent certification of EEMS RTD
TMI Data
- 12/23/2015
TMI
EEMS
STD
RTD
cert date=
12/23/2015
01226
diff
corrected
-25.000
-25.02
0.020
-25.035
0.000
0.05
-0.050
0.044
100.000
99.96
0.040
99.991
150.000
149.95
0.050
150.000
0.000
-0.006
0.000
-0.006
RTD 01230/01231
2016 correction:
slope=
0.99962748
intercept=
0.0059542
0.9999999
Cw St" 1/10/2016
At Date fluke =
01311
01312
01310
EEMS 1/10/2016
EEMS
EEMS
EEMS
RTD
SEG
van 2
van 1
01226 thermo=
01236
01237
01238
raw corrected
raw
corrected
raw
corrected
raw
corrected
0.02 0.01
0.1
0.09
0.1
0.12
0.1
0.07
15.62 15.62
15.6
15.58
15.6
15.60
15.7
15.65
31.79 31.80
31.8
31.77
31.7
31.69
31.8
31.72
50.64 50.65
50.6
50.56
50.6
50.58
50.7
50.59
68.69 68.71
68.8
68.75
68.8
68.76
68.9
68.76
89.91 89.90
90.0
89.94
90.0
89.95
90.2
90.03
80.46 80.45
80.5
80.45
80.5
80.45
80.5
80.34
-0.01
-0.01
0.02
-0.03
Thermocouple offset =
-0.2
-0.6
0.4
POST CALIBRATION CHECK
23.63 23.63
23.7
23.68
23.6
23.60
23.6
23.53
slope =
1.000533
1.0007715
1.00161
intercept =
0.009986
-0.015795
0.02947
correlation =
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
-------
Designation: E 104 - 85
Standard Practice for
Maintaining Constant Relative Humidity by Means of Aqueous
Solutions1
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E 104; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision- A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval, A
superscript epsilon (<) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
Scope
1.1 This practice describes two methods for generating
constant relative humidity (rh) environments in relatively
small containers.
1.2 This practice is applicable for obtaining constant
relative humidities ranging from dryness to near saturation
at temperatures spanning from 0 to 50°C.
1.3 This practice is applicable for closed systems such as
environmental conditioning containers and for the calibra-
tion of hygrometers.
1.4 This practice is not recommended for the generation
of continuous (flowing) streams of constant humidity unless
precautionary criteria are followed to ensure source stability.
[See Section 9.)
1.5 Caution—Both saturated salt solutions and sulfuric
acid-water solutions are extremely corrosive, and care should
be taken in their preparation and handling.
1.6 This standard may involve hazardous materials, oper-
ations, and equipment. This standard does not purport to
address alt of the safety problems associated with its use. It is
the responsibility of whoever uses this standard to consult and
establish appropriate safety and health practices and deter-
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
(For more specific safety precautionary information see 1.5
and 10.1.)
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
D 1193 Specification for Reagent Water1
D4023 Definitions of Terms Relating to Humidity
Measurements3
E 126 Test Method for Inspection and Verification of
Hydrometers4
2.2 Other Document:
DIN50008 "Konstantklimate uber waBerigen Losungen"
(Constant Climates Over Aqueous Solutions).
Part 1: Saturated Salt and Glycerol Solutions.
Part 2: Sulfuric Acid Solutions. (1981)3
1 This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D-22 on
^npling and Analysis of Atmospheres and is the direct responsibility of
Subcommittee D22.II on Meteorology.
Current edition approved Feb. 22, 1985. Published June 1985,
2 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 11.01.
3 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 11.03.
4 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 14.03.
5 Published by Deutsche® Institut fur Normung, 4-10 Burggrzfenstrasse
p°stfach 1107, EM000 Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany. Also available from
^Sl Publication Office, New York, NY.
3. Definitions
3.1 non-hygroscopic material—material which neither ab-
sorbs nor retains water vapor,
3.2 ~bor"Sefimuons oflDlHSfiernJS used'in tlriirpractice-
refer to Definitions D 4023.
#
4. Summary of Practice
4,1 Standard value relative humidity environments are
generated using selected aqueous saturated salt solutions or
various strength sulfuric acid-water systems.
5. Significance and Use
5.1 Standard value relative humidity environments are
important for conditioning materials in shelf-life studies or
in the testing of mechanical properties such as dimensional
stability and strength. Relative humidity is also an important
operating variable for the calibration of many species of
measuring instruments.
6. Interferences
6.1 Temperature regulation of any solution-head space
environment to ±0.1 °C is essential for realizing generated
relative humidity values within ±0.5 % (expected).
6.2 Sulfuric Acid—Water systems are strongly hygro-
scopic and can substantially change value by absorption and
desorption if stored in an open container. Only freshly
prepared solutions, or solutions which values have been
independently tested for strength should be used.
6.3 Some aqueous saturated salt solutions change compo-
sition following preparation by hydrolysis or by reaction with
environmental components (for example, carbon dioxide
absorption by alkaline materials). These solutions should be
freshly prepared on each occasion of use.
7. Apparatus
7.1 Container—The container, including a cover or lid
which can be secured airtight, should be made of corrosion
resistant, non-hygroscopic material such as glass. A metal or
plastic container is acceptable if the solution is retained in a
dish or tray made of appropriate material. Refer also to 9.2
for size restrictions,
7.2 Hydrometers—One or more hydrometers may be
used to test sulfuric acid solution densities for the range of
humidities concerned. The hydrometers) should have a
minimum scale division of 0.001 gm/cm3. (Refer to Test
Method E 126.)
-------
# E 104
8. Reagents wd Materials
8.1 Purity of Reagents—Reagent grade chemicals shall be
usod for preparation of all standard solutions. Unless other-
wise indicated, it is intended that all reagents conform to the
specifications of the Committee on Analytical Reagents of
the American Chemical Society where such specifications are
available.6 Other grades may be used, provided it is first
ascertained that the reagent is of sufficiently high purity to
permit its use without lessening the accuracy of the determi-
nation.
8.1,1 Saturated salt solutions may be prepared using
cither amorphous or hydrated reagents (that is, reagents
containing water of crystallization}. Hydrated reagents are
often preferred to amorphous forms for their solvating
characteristics.
82 Purity of Water—-Reagent water produced by distilla-
tion, or by ion exchange, or reverse osmosis followed by
distillation be used. See Specification D 1193.
9, Technical Precautions
9.1 Although a container capable of airtight closure is
described in Section 7, it may be desirable to have a vent
under certain conditions of test or with some kinds of
containers (changes in pressure may produce undesirable
cracks in some types of containers). The vent should be as
^maTl as practical to minimize loss of desired equilibrium
conditions when in use.
92 The container should be small to minimize the
influence of any temperature variations acting upon the
container and contents. A maximum proportion of 25 cm
volume/cm1 of solution surface area is suggested, and overall
container headspace volume should be no larger than
necessary to confine 8 stored item.
93 Measurement accuracy is strongly dependent on the
ability to achieve and maintain temperature stability during
actual use of any solution system. Temperature instability of
±0.I*C can cause corresponding instabilities in generated
values of relative humidity of ±0 J %,
9.4 The compatibility of any constant relative humidity
system used for instrument calibration testing should be
confirmed by reference to the instrument manufacturer's
instructions. f
93 Important considerations leading to stability should
include (but afe not necessarily limited to) the following:
93J Kiitnipation of leakage paths.
952 Elimination of heat sources or heat sinks, or both,
for temperature stability.
93.3 T imifing flow rate to preclude source carry-over.
* -Rascal Cbanlak American Chemical Society Spoitotioas," Afit Ojot-
tri Sot, w.rfiinp/m. DC Fcrsueecstiocis oa (hetatinj of reagents not Jia«l by
the American Society, ~Ro£at Qiccucih tad Su&iirdi," by
J
-------
® E 104
ANNEXES
{Mandatory Information)
Al.I EQUILIBRIUM RELATIVE HUMIDITY VALUES FOR SELECTED SATURATED
AQUEOUS SALT SOLUTIONS
Iwera-
i«rc)
Chloride*
UCf, %
Potassium
Acstnta*
CHjCcolt
Magnesium
CMorida'*
Mgdj-
6H.O, S
Potassium
Carbonate'*
KjCOj.K
Magnesium
Mfrete'1
MgCWOA-
6HjO,S
Sodium
CHortJe"
Ksa*
- Potassium
Chloride'*
KCt, X
Barium
Chloride®
Bactj'
HjO. %
Potassium
Nitrata*
KNOj. X
Potassium
SUfataA
KjSO
-------
Date
1/23/2016 - - Calculation of correction factor for RH standard with most recent certification of EEMS Hygropalm
TMI - Certification date
= 12/24/2015
TMI
STD
EEMS
Hygropalm
cert date=
4/11/2015
01225
diff corrected
33.000
50.000
75.000
33.40
49.30
74.40
-0.400 33.279
0.700 49.532
0.600 75.189
Rotronic 01225
2016 correction:
for RH
slope= 0.9783
intercept= 0.8446
0.9998137
lu&2h~
At
Date
EEMS
1/23/2016
Hygropalm
01225
raw
corrected
33.2
33.07
53.7
54.03
70.9
71.61
90.7
91.85
-0.86
-0.86
-0.86
-0.86
ID :
salt
32.8
52.9
75.3
93.6
EEMS
EEMS
EEMS
to 01225
to salt
to salt
01220
01220
01225
raw
corrected
raw
corrected
raw
corrected
33.9
32.69
33.9
34.51
33.2
35.01
54.5
53.61
54.5
56.58
53.7
57.19
74.1
73.50
74.1
77.58
70.9
75.80
91.1
90.76
91.1
95.79
90.7
97.22
-1.72
-1.81
-0.91
-1.72
-1.81
-0.91
-1.72
-1.81
-0.91
-1.72
-1.81
-0.91
0.985069
0.9333384
0.92426
1.693537
1.6935374
0.84459
0.9987
0.9987
1.0000
POST CALIBRATION CHECK
slope =
intercept =
correlation =
-------
Certificate Number
A2063482
Issue Date: 12/24/15
Certificate of Calibration
Page 1 of 2
Customer: ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING & MEASUREMENT SERVICES
1128 NW 39TH DRIVE
GAINESVILLE, FL 32605
FEDEX
P.O. Number:
ID Nil
01225
Description: THERMO HYGROMETER
Manufacturer: ROTRONIC
Model Number: HYGROPALM
Serial Number; 40861 002/124431
Technician: SEAN LEWIS
On-Site Calibration: ~
Comments:
Limiting Attribute:
12/24/2015
"l272372CTi6
TMI-M-HYGROTHERMOGRAPHS
Rev: 2/22/2011
70 F
43 % RH
RU
Calibration Date:
Calibration Due:
Procedure:
Temperature:
Humidity:
As Found Condition: IN TOLERANCE
Calibration Results: IN TOLERANCE
\v\ ^ O.^ ^
b ~ 0-1
o.nn
This instrument has been calibrated using standards traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology, derived from natural physical constants, ratio
measurements or compared to consensus standards. Unless otherwise noted, the method of calibration is direct comparison to a known standard.
Reported uncertainties and "test uncertainty ratios" (TUR's) are expressed as expanded uncertainty values at approximately 95% conridence level using a coverage
factor of K=2. A TUR of 4i Is routinely observed unless otherwise noted on the certificate. Statements of compliance are based on test results falling within specif ed
limits with no reduction by the uncertainty of the measurement.
TMI's Quality System is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 and ANSI/NCSL Z540-1 by A2LA. ISO/IEC17025 is written in a language relevant to laboratory operations,
meeting the principles of ISO 9001 and aligned with its pertinent requirements. The instrument listed on this certificate has been calibrated to the requirements of
ANSI/NCSL Z540-1 and TMI's Quality Manual, QM-1.
Results contained in this document relate only to the item calibrated. Calibration due dates appearing on She certificate or label are determined by the client for
administrative purposes and do not imply continued conformance to specifications.
This certificate shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written permission of Technical Maintenance, Inc.
-
FRANK BAHMANN, BRANCH MANAGER
Calibration Standards
Asset Number Manufacturer Model Number
9304027 THUNDER SCIENTIFIC 2500
JACK SHULER, QUALITY MANAGER
Date Calibrated
4/11/2015
Cal Due
4/11/2016
1*?
tp
tMi
Technical Maintenance, Inc.
Ai -
o. lysis'
0.1W6
Rev 8
6/30/15
12530 TELECOM DRIVE, TEMPLE TERRACE, FL 33637
Phone: 813-978-3054 Fax 813-978-3758
www.tmicalibration.com
AN.SI/NC'SL Z540-I-1 «4
-------
Certificate Number
A2063482
Issue Date: 12/24/15
Certificate of Calibration
Page 2 of 2
Data Sheet
Parameter
Nominal
Minimum
Maximum
As Found
As Left
Unit
Temperature Accuracy
61.7
61 3
62.1
62.0
62.0
°F
Temperature Accuracy
68,9
68.6
69.3
68.9
68 9
°F
Temperature Accuracy
79.6
79.2
80.0
79.5
79.5
°F
Relative Humidity Accuracy
33.0
32.0
34 0
33.4
33,4
%RH
Relative Humidity Accuracy
50.0
48 8
St.3
49.3
49.3
%RH
Relative Humidity Accuracy
75.0
73.5
76.6
74.4
74.4
%RH
tMt
Technical Maintenance, Inc.
Rev 8
6/30/1S
12530 TELECOM DRIVE, TEMPLE TERRACE, FL 33637
Phone: 813-978-3054 Pax 813-978-3758
www.tmicalibration.com
ANSI/NCSL Z540-I -1994
-------
A2063483 Certificate of Calibration
Issue Date: 12/24/15 ^^~~~~~~"""""—~
Customer: ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING & MEASUREMENT SERVICES
1128 NW39TH DRIVE P.O. Number:
GAINESVILLE, FL 32605 ID Number: 45656048/124432
FEDEX
Description: TEMP/HUM PROBE
Manufacturer: ROTRONIC
Model Number: HYGROCLIP
Serial Number: 45656 048/124432
Technician: SEAN LEWIS
On-Site Calibration: ~
Comments:
Calibration Date:
Calibration Due:
Procedure:
Temperature:
Humidity:
12/24/2015
12/24/2016
TMI-M-HYGROTHERMOGRAPHS
Rev: 2/22/2011
70 F
43 % RH
As Found Condition: IN TOLERANCE
Calibration Results: IN TOLERANCE
Limiting Attribute:
This instrument has beers calibrated using standards traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology, derived from natural physical constants, ratio
measurements or compared to consensus standards. Unless otherwise noted , the method of calibration is direct comparison to a known standard
Reported uncertainties and "test uncertainty ratios" (TUR's) are expressed as expanded uncertainty values at approximately 95% confidence level using a coverage
factor of K=2 A TUR of 4:1 is routinely observed unless otherwise noted on the certificate. Statements of compliance are based on test results falling within specified
limits with no reduction by the uncertainty of the measurement,
TMI's Quality System is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 and ANSI/NCSL Z54Q-1 by A2LA. ISO/IEC17025 Is written In a language relevant to laboratory operations,
meeting the principles of ISO 9001 and aligned with its pertinent requirements. The instrument listed on this certificate has been calibrated to the requirements of
ANSI/NCSL Z540-1 and TMI's Quality Manual, QM-1,
Results contained in this document relate only to the item calibrated. Calibration due dates appearing on the certificate or label are determined by the client for
administrative purposes and do not imply continued conformance to specifications.
This certificate shaii not be reproduced, except in full, without the written permission of Technical Maintenance, inc,
A
- ^ "
FRANK BAHMANN, BRANCH MANAGER JACK SHULER, QUALITY MANAGER
Calibration Standards
Asset Number Manufacturer Model Number Date Calibrated Cal Due
9304027 THUNDER SCIENTIFIC 2500 4/11/2015 4/11/2016
tMt
Technical Maintenance, Inc.
Rev 8
6/30/15
12530 TELECOM DRIVE, TEMPLE TERRACE FL 33637
Phone: 813-978-3054 Fax 813-978-3758
www-tmicalibfation.com
ANSI/NCSL Z540-1-1994
-------
Certificate Number *»f ^ § m § »
A2063483 Certificate of Calibration
tssue Date: 12/24/15 r-- _ . _
Data Sheet
Parameter
Nomina!
Minimum
Maximum
As Found
As Left
Unit
Temperature Accuracy
61.7
61.3
62.1
62.0
62.0
°F
Temperature Accuracy
68,9
63.5
69.3
68.9
68.9
°F
Temperature Accuracy
79.6
79.2
80.0
79.5
79.5
eF
Relative Humidity Accuracy
33 0
32.0
34.0
33.4
33.4
%RH
Relative Humidity Accuracy
50.0
48.E
51 3
49.3
49,3
%RH
Relative Humidity Accuracy
75.0
73.5
7S.6
74.4
74.4
%RH
tMi
Technical Maintenance, Inc.
Rev. 8
6/30/15
12530 TELECOM DRIVE, TEMPLE TERRACE, FL 33637
Phone 813-978-3054 Fax 813-978-3758
www.tmicalibration.com
ANS1/NCSL Z540-1 -1994
-------
Warren-Knight Instrument Company
2045 Bennett Road
Philadelphia, PA 19116
Phone: 215-464-9300; Fax: 215-464-9303
Web: http://www.warrenind.com
CERTIFICATION OF CALIBRATION AND CONFORMANCE
We hereby certify that the equipment below has been manufactured and/or inspected by
standards traceable to NIST. Calibration of the specified instrument has been performed in
compliance with ANSI Z540-I requirements. It is warranted that the equipment has been
calibrated to be in full conformance with the drawings and specifications ot the instrument.
Calibration tests were performed on the material specified below and were in accordance with all
applicable quality assurance requirements with data on file at our facility.
Customer Name:
Envirommsrital Engineering & Measurement Services, Inc.
Purchase Order #:
""" A
Instrument: /
UshikataTracbn S-25 Compass
Serial Number: V
191832 j
Quantity:
> I I '
Calibration Due:
12/2016
p \ '2—
f John Noga, Quality Control
f
January 14, 2016
Measurement Standards
Theodolite Wild T-3 S/N 18801 Calibration 02/06/15 Due 02/06/16 NIST Number 738/229329-83 738/223398
Optical Wedge K.&E 71 -7020 S/N 5167 Calibration 02/12/14 Due 02/12/19 731 /244084-89 73 1/2216117
W:\Wi DOCUMENTS WORKING\emarkowski\CaIibral>on CertsEE & US-EE & MS Cen S2S Compass SN 190037 1-14-16 xc
-------
i
if 3
S||g !/•
W'arren-Knight Instrument Company
2045 Bennett Road
Philadelphia, PA 19116
Phone: 215-464-9300; Fa^24€r^m~Q3Q3
Web: httD://www_warreBifM.cc>ni
Serial Number
Calibration Frequency
Pc^su ^ 1 2-
Calibration Data Record
f emperature:
Humidity:
Customer Name
Item Name
Manufacturer
Model
T^T-75-
Calibration Date
Job Card Number
i
Customer Reference Mum
Date of Ceiification
WeBiurerneflt Standards
Theodolite WiltiT-3 S/N IBB01 Calibration 02/12/15 Due 02/12/16 WIST Number73B/229329-B3 738/223398
Optical Wedge K&£ 71-7020 S/N SIB? Calibration; 02/12/14 Due 2/12/1B, Ni5T Number 731/243CIS4-B9 731/27161?
Ifiif; = l B&rii-irl
Initial! R&pori
Vanes
~ Pass ~ Fail
Direction
(Dfcgr&e)
Tolfccsnie
(Mmuul
Compass Wtedtt £#fs?
(Minute)
Pivot In line with Cirde/Sights
V-30
+/• 30
Pivot Sharpness
~ Pass ~ Fail
+/-30
Straighiness (+/-15 Minutes)
~ Pass ~ Fail
+/- 30
Balance
~ Pass ~ Fail
+/- 3D
lifter Function
~ Pass ~ Fs
+/-30
Azimuth Ring
Control Knob Function
+/-30
~ Pass D Fail
4/-30
Pinion Gear
~ Pass ~ FaiS
Graduation Cbriry
~ Pass ~ Fail
Graduation less than 1 minute in any position
~ Pass ~ Fail
Level Bubble
Bubble rr
Level
~ Pass U Fail
Physical Condition
~ Pass ~ Fail
Psss/Resar/Re place
Pass |
N/A |
Replace |
Repair
~
~
~
~
Needle
3 Sharpen E Magneiiie
~
o
~
~
Cap with jewel
~
o
~
~
Pivot E Sharpen
~
~
O
~
Level 0
Remount
~
~
~
~
North Sigh
t
D
~
~
~
North Sigh
t Block
~
~
~
~
South Sight
~
D
~
D
South Sig
hi Block
~
~
~
~
Vane Spring
~
~
~
~
Drive
~
~
~
~
Control Knob Assembly
D
~
O
~
Cover GIe
ss
~
~
~
~
Cover Glass Gasket
~
~
~
~
.Clamp Screw
~
~
D
~
Pinion Gear
~
~
~
P
Compass Ring
*
PFnsI Jiepprt
Vanes
p{re*5iao
(Degree)
Tolerana
jW)l\LftSj
Cannes Mssdie Error
| Minute)
Pivot in line with Circle/Sights
1
l- Pass ~ Fail
D
+/-3D
^3o
Needle /
fiS
-f/• 30
<
Pivot Sharpness
pass ~ Fail
90
+¦/» 3D
Straightness (+¦/-IS Minutes)
E (fsis ~
Fail
135
*J-3 B
<30
Baiance
t£l/f®a5S D Fail
ISO
*/-30
< 0O
lifter Function
/
Pass ~ Fall
225
+/»3D
< 3&
Alfmutn Rifle
270
+/-30
Control Knob Function
Pass ~ Fail
315
+/*30
- I.
/RepairTpc
hnictan
John Noga, Quafity Assurance
-------
I
a Warren-Knight Instrument Company
2045 Bennett Road
K Philadelphia, PA 19116
J Phone: 215-464-9300; Fax: 215-464-9303
Web: http://www.warrenind.com
CERTIFICATION OF CALIBRATION AND CONFORMANCE
llereby certify that the equipment below lias been manufactured and/or inspected by
standards traceable to NISI. Calibration of the specified instrument has been performed in
compliance with ANSI Z540-1 requirements. It is warranted that the equipment has been
calibrated to be in full conformance with the drawings and specifications of the instrument.
Calibration tests were performed on the materia! specified below and were in accordance with all
applicable quality assurance requirements with data on file at our facility.
Customer Name:
Envjxoomental Engineering & Measurement Services Im-
Purchase Order #:
Instrument: /
Ushikata I raiton S-25 Compass ^
Serial Number: /
1900" J /nl-Ldf
Quantity:
1 ^
Calibration Due:
kaarie mi<
I
-Jk/'-L
./ John N0ga; Quality Control
ft#
An y.rvy
January 14. 2016
Measurement Standards
Theodolite Wild T-3 S/N 18801 Calibration 02/06/15 Due 02/06/16 N1ST Number 738/229329-83 738/223398
Optical Wedge K&E 71-7020 S/N 5167 Calibration 02/12/14 Due 02/12 19 731 ,'244084-89 731/22161 i7
W \W! DOCUMENTS WORKING\BmarUowski\C3)ibmtton CeitsWE & MSJEE & MS Cert S25 Compass SN 19Q03? 2-T9-T5 doc
-------
Warren-Knight Instrument Company
2045 Bennett Road
\£ Philadelphia, PA 19116
E ' Phone: 215-464-9300; Fax: 215-464-9303
Web: httoi/Aw'w.warreriirid.coi;
2- 0*^ "Z.
Cslibrstfon Data Record
— ""
Temperature:
Humidity:
Customer Name /
Itent Name
ustf/jL&r#
Manufacturer /
O it Li
Model
Serial Number
t90037
Calibration Date
Calibration Frequency
/fob Card Number
7.3ot> 5s"
Customer Reference NumbeK
Date of Certification
Theodolite Wild T-3 S/N 1S801 Calibration 02/12/15 Due 02712/15 NI5T Number 73S/22S32S-B3 738/223398
Optical Wedge K&E 71-7020S/N 5167 Calibration; 02/12/14 Due 2/12/19, NIST Number 731/244034-8S 731/231617
Vanes
Direction
fOfegree)
Tolerance
(Minute)
Campt&t NwcHe Erto-'
(Manure j
Pivot in fine with Circle/Sights
~ Pass O Fail
0
+/-3Q
*
45
+/-3Q
Pivot Sharpness
~ Pass ~ Fail
90
+/-30
Strsightness (+/-1S Minutes)
~ Pass ~ Fail
135
+/*30
Balance
~ Pass ~ rail
180
+/-30
Lifter Function
LJ Pass ~ Fail
2ZS
+/-30
270
+/-30
Control Knob Function
~ pass O Fail
315
+/-30
Pinion Gear
~ Pass ~ Fail
Graduation Clarity
~ Pass ~ Fail
Graduation less than 1 minute in any position
~ Pass ~ Fail
Level Bubble
Bubble in Level
Physical Condition
~ Pass ~ Fail
D Pass ~ Fail
Psss
N/A |
Reciace
Rspsir
~
~
~
~
NeedlE 0 Sharpen B Magnetise
~
~
~
~
Cap with Jewel
~
~
~
~
Pivot IE Sharpen
D
~
~
D
Level 0 Remount
~
~
~
~
North Sight
~
~
~
~
North Sight Block
~
D
~
~
South Steht
~
~
~
~
South Sight Block
~
~
~
~
Vane Spring
~
~
~
~
Drive
~
~
~
~
Control Knob Assembly
~
~
~
~
Cover Glass
n
~
~
~
Cover Glass Gaske;
~
~
~
~
Ciamp Screw
D
~
~
~
Pinion Gear
~
n
~
~
Compass Ring
'
Fine! Export
Ca*7\pajs Wcedi# cw
%mLrts^
<
jirsctf?-
Vsn&s
i:-rr-t-e
Pivot in I'ne vvrth Circle/Sights
Pivot Sharpness
Straightness (+/-XS Minutes f
Balance
f/ Pass ~ Faii
Lifter Function
Azimuth Ring
JPbss ~ Fai
Control Knob Function
m
Pinion Gear
yyass ~ Fail
tZf Pjgss D Fai"
Graduation Clarity
Graduation less than 1 minute in any position
Level Bubble
6>£
/Fp
Bubble »n Leves
Pass ~ Fail
cal Condition
John Noga, Quality Assurance
epair Technician
-------
Warren-Knight Instrument Company
2045 Bennett Road
Philadelphia, PA 19116
Phone: 215-464-9300; Fax: 215^64-9303
Web: http://www.warrenind.oom
CERTIFICATION OF CALIBRATION AND CONFORMANCE
We hereby certify thai the equipment below has been manufactured and/or inspected by
standards traceable to NIST. Calibration of the specified instrument has been performed in
compliance with ANSI Z540-1 requirements. It is warranted that the equipment has been
calibrated to be in full conformance with the drawings and specifications of the instrument.
Calibration tests were performed on the material specified below and were in accordance with all
applicable quality assurance requirements with data on file at our facility.
Customer Name:
Environmental Engineering & Measurement Services, Inc.
Purchase Order #:
Instrument: /
Ushikata ^tVcon S-25 Compass .
Serial Number:
199578 )
Quantity: \
1 ^ / )
Calibration Due:
I"*- °l Zo 15
A-fo .
JohntNoga, Quality Control
/
January 14, 2016
Measurement Standards
Theodolite Wild T-3 S/N 18801 Calibration 02/06/15 Due 02/06/16 NIST Number 738/229329-83 738/223398
I Optical Wedge K&F. 71-7020 S/N 5167 Calibration 02/12/14 Due 02/12/19 731/244084-89 731/2216117
W:\WI DOCUMENTS WQRKINGtemarkowsWCahbration Certs\EE & MS\EE & MS Cert S25 Compass SN 751832 1-14-1G.doc
-------
[if
r
Uj
Warren-Knight Instrument Company
2045 Bennett Road
Philadelphia, PA 19116
Phone: 215-464-9300, Fax: 215-464-9303
Web: htto ://www.waiTentod. com
Calibration Data Record
Customer Name
Manufacturer
Serial Number
Calibration Frequency
Customer Reference
Measurement Standards
Theod o.lite Wiiri T-3 S/w IBS01
;em Name
lodel
Calibration Date
Dste of Certification
Temperature:
USW/X4-7-A
Hum iditv:
JT^JTT?
^S~2.30ST
i — 02/12/15 Due 02/12/16 MIST Number 73S/229329-fi:: 73F:rmvw
Optical Wedge K&E 71-7020 S/N 5167 Calibration; 02/12/14 Due~2/12/19, N)ST Number 73l7;^nBJ.Bg 73i
Jnftiaf Report " " " — ™ — £ .
VaflP!
Direction
(Deree)
Totems
(Minute J
Cempss NfrtcKe Eftor
IMinure)
Pivot in line with Circle/Sights
~ Pass ~ Fail
Pivot Sharpnes
U Pass ~ fail
-STraighT.ne;t (-¦-/- 15 Minutes!
~ Pass Q F
BalancE
~ Pass ~ Fa
Litter Function
~ Pass ~ Fa
Azimuth Ring
Control Knob Function
~ Pass ~ Fa
Pinion Gear
~ Pass ~ Fe
Graduation Clarity
~ Fa
Graduation Jess than I minute in any position
Leuel Bubbls
Bubble in Level
~ Pass ~ Fa
Physical Condition
I ~ Pass ~ Faii
•pa ir/RepJsce
Ps«/R
Replace
Repair
B Sharpen S fctegn'etizs
Nr?dl-
Cap with Jewel
Pivot £ Sharper
Level E Remount
North Sigh;
North Sight Block
SDuth Sight
Scjth Sisn; Block
Vane Spring
Control Knob Assembiy
Cover Glass
Cover Glass Gaske
Clamp Sere v.
Pinion Gear
Compass Rins
Fins- Report
Va.ies
Di rwxiQf
iDlersna
tMfnva'
Comsaa, MMf^leEnmr
iMiflJtS}
(Degrpg!
Pivot in line with Circle/Sights
~ Far
W?>
Pivot Sharpness
'ass D Fsi:
Straightness (+/-15 Minutes;
ss ~ Fail
Balance
ass ~ Fbi
Lifter Function
Pass ~ Fail
Azimuth Rinr
Control Knob Function
Pinion Gear
Graduation Clarity
Graduation less than 1 minute in any position
/P^Pass ~ Fail
LeveJ Bubble
Bubble in Level
ass ~ Far
~0 Pass ~ Faii
ysical Condition
Repairfechnidan
John Noga, Qua lity Assurance
-------
YOU IMG
CALIBRATION PROCEDURE ^
18802/18811 ANEMOMETER DRIVE
OL~LG>0 I 0 IZ&t I O tZ&l
DWG: CP18802{C)
REV: C101107 PAGE: 4 of 4
BY: TJT DATE: 10/11/07
CHK: JC W.C. GAS-12
CERTIFICATE OF CALIBRATION AND TESTING
R. M. Young Company certifies that the equipment listed below was inspected and calibrated prior to
shipment in accordance with established manufacturing and testing procedures Standards established
by R.M. Young Company for calibrating the measuring and test equipment used in controlling product
quality are traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology,
MODEL: 18802/ 18811 SERIAL NUMBER: C-4oZ117
(18802 Comprised of Models 1882GA Control Unit & 18830A Motor Assembly)
(18811 Comprised of Models 18820A Control Unlt& 18831A Motor Assembly)
Nominal
Motor RPM
27106D Output
Frequency (Hz) - (1)
Calculated
Rpm (1)
Indicated
Rpm (2)
18802
H CW / CCW rotation verified
300
*30
%OD
5,DD
2700
4%o
21OO
2.1 on
5100
PAH
5 \ OCj
S\oo
7500
\z$o
T>qo
!*>oc>
10,200
noo
\QZOO
I OZor>
12,600
2.1 Ofi
12 CoOft
\Z feOO
15,000
25oo
iSooo
t^bOOG
18811
81 CW / CCW rotation verified
30.0
io. O
"^O.D
150.0
25
l€>0. o
ISO.O
300.0
*50
%oo.o
?>oo.o
450.0
450.0
4So.d
600.0
IOD
b oo.o
CtOO.O
750.0
76o. o
990.0
its
Q4o. o
QQo.o
(1) Measured frequency output of RM Young Model 27106D standard anemometer attached
to motor shaft - 27106D produces 10 pulses per revolution of the anemometer shaft.
(2) Indicated on the Control Unit LCD display.
* indicates out of tolerance
~ New Unit(s)
H Service / Repair Unit ~ As Found
H No Calibration Adjustments Required ~ As Left
Traceable frequency meter-i3S5frTrrcsJi|?ration Model: "DCV^o SN:
Date of inspection/^ \\ Q^ ^ ® / O / F> I ~?L 7
Inspection Interval^ One Year
Tested By
Filename: CP18802(C),doc
-------
x>
9
CALIBRATION PROCEDURE
18802/18811 ANEMOMETER DRIVE
YOUNG
DWG: CP18802(C)
REV: C101107 PAGE: 4 of 4
BY: TJT DATE: 10/11/07
CHK: JC W.C. GAS-12
CERTIFICATE OF CALIBRATION AND TESTING
R. M. Young Company certifies that the equipment listed below was inspected and calibrated prior to
shipment in accordance with established manufacturing and testing procedures. Standards established
by R.M. Young Company for calibrating the measuring and test equipment used in controlling product
quality are traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
MODEL: 18802/18811 SERIAL NUMBER: CA04013
(18802 Comprised of Models 1882QA Control Unit & 18830A Motor Assembly)
(18811 Comprised of Models 18820A Control Unit & 18831A Motor Assembly)
0
rL
Nominal
Motor RPM
27106D Output
Frequency (Hz) - (1)
Calculated
Rprn (1)
Indicated
Rpm (2)
18802
E) CW / CCW rotation verified
300
50
300
300
2700
450
2700
2700
5100
850
5100
5100
7500
1250
7500
7500
10,200
1700
10.200
10,200
12,600
2100
12,600
12,600
15,000
2500
15,000
15,000
18811
El CW / CCW notation verified
30.0
5
30.0
30.0
150.0
25
150.0
150.0
300 0
50
300.0
300.0
450 0
75
450.0
450.0
5000
100
600.0
600.0
750.0
125
750,0
750.0
990 0
165
990.0
990.0
d)
(2)
Measured frequency output of RM Young Model 27106D standard anemometer attached
to motor shaft - 27106D produces 10 pulses per revolution of the anemometer shaft
Indicated on the Control Unit LCD display
* Indicates out of tolerance
~ New Unit(s)
Service / Repair Unit D As Found
El No Calibration Adjustments Required ~ As Left
Traceable frequency meter used in-calibration Model: DP5740 SN 4863
f \
Date of inspectiotn 11 Feb 2016
Inspection Interval One Year ,
Tested By %.?•
Fuertame CP1S802(C i doc
-------
E£ms
Oi
i ^ r
YOUNG
R.M, Young Company
2801 Aero Park Drive
Traverse City, Michigan 49686 USA
Certificate of Calibration and Testing
Test Unit:
Mods!:
Description:
18802 Serial Number:
Anemometer Drive - 200 to 15,000 Rpm
- Comprised of Models 18920A Control Unit & 1883QA Motor Assembly
R.M. Young Company certifies that the above equipment has been inspected and
calibrated using standards whose accuracies are traceable to the National Institute of
Standards and Technologies (NIST).
Nominal
Motor
Rpm
27106D Output
Frequency
Hz (1)
Calculated
Rpm (2)
Indicated
Rpm (3)
300
50
3, oo
30O
2700
L/50
-xnoa
¦a'100
5100
%SD
5lco
£lOO
7500
ISaO
75^o
10,200
noo
lO lOO
/CiZCO
12,600
a loo
) •*.(*£> O
/atpOG
15,000
2.&00
ISooo
l^cdo
Clockwise and Counterclockwise rotation verified
(1) Measured frequency output of RM Young Model 27106D standard anemometer
attached to motor shaft
(2) 27106D produces 10 pulses per revolution of the anemometer shaft
(3) Indicated on the Control Unit LCD display
indicates out of tolerance
Traceable frequency meter used in calibration
3. h
19*3
Date of inspection
' Cg
Tested Bv
Tel, 231-946-3980 fax: 231-946-4772 ima
-------
Environics
-------
Environics
(SO 9001
in him i n
0/152-
Series 9100
System SN 6496
FLOW CALIBRATION/CERTIFICATION REPORT
MFC# 2 Size: 100 SCCM
SERIAL# 0106722025
This flow controller was calibrated using a NIST-traceable Flow Standard. This calibration was performed
with AIR at a standard reference temperature of 77°F and a pressure of 29.92 in, Hg. This is not
performance data This data is used by the system operating modes to improve the flow accuracy.
Set Flow True Flow
5
%
5.0
SCCM
5.303
SCCM
10
%
10.0
SCCM
10.409
SCCM
20
%
20.0
SCCM
20.683
SCCM
30
%
30.0
SCCM
30.839
SCCM
40
%
40.0
SCCM
40.997
SCCM
50
%
50.0
SCCM
51.149
SCCM
60
%
60.0
SCCM
61.482
SCCM
70
%
70.0
SCCM
71.545
SCCM
80
%
80.0
SCCM
81.693
SCCM
90
%
90.0
SCCM
92.085
SCCM
100
%
100.0
SCCM
102.610
SCCM
Slope 1.0216
Intercept 0.1661
Verified by ./ —^
aAl ' U'-l/ itck 'L 4" Date: —/<3'~ }
Computerized Gas Mixing, Dilution / Calibration Systems
Environics Inc. * 69 Industrial Park Road East«Tolland. CT 06084 * (860) 872-1111 * Fax (860) 870-9333
World Wide Web: http://www.environics.com E-mail info@environics.com
-------
Environics
ISO 9001
¦ mnrrrri
~ Series 9100
Oi/f z
System SN 6496
FLOW CALIBRATION/CERTIFICATION REPORT
MFC# 3 Size: 10 SCCM
SERIAL #0009449001
This flow controller was calibrated using a NIST-traceable Flow Standard. This calibration was performed
with AIR at a standard reference temperature of 77°F and a pressure of 29.92 in, Hg. This is not
performance data, This data is used by the system operating modes to improve the flow accuracy.
Set Flow True Flow
5
%
0.5
SCCM
0.525
SCCM
10
%
1.0
SCCM
1.053
SCCM
20
%
2.0
SCCM
2.089
SCCM
30
%
3.0
SCCM
3.122
SCCM
40
%
4.0
SCCIVI
4.137
SCCM
50
%
5.0
SCCM
5.160
SCCM
60
%
6.0
SCCIVI
6.163
SCCM
70
%
7.0
SCCM
7.151
SCCM
80
%
8.0
SCCM
8.148
SCCM
90
%
9.0
SCCM
9.194
SCCM
100
%
10.0
SCCM
10.199
SCCM
Slope 1.0156
Intercept 0.0523
Verified by
u? J U AC-l-MCt-l/il Date: ^ ^- /<$Q
Computerized Gas Mixing / Dilution / Calibration Systems
Environics Inc. * 69 Industrial Park Road East - Tolland. CT 06084 • (860) 872-1111 • Fax: (860) 870-9333
World Wide Web: http://www.environics.com E-mail: info@environics.com
-------
Certificate Number
A2062909
Issue Date: 12/23/15
Certificate of
Page 1 of ^
Customer. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING & MEASUREMENT SERVICES
1128 NW 39TH DRIVE
GAINESVILLE. FL 32605
FEDEX
P.O. Numb
ID Num
01310
(^12/23/2015
12723/2016
METCAL FLUKE 187
Rev: 6/15/2015
68 F
42 % RH
As Found ConditiomlN TOLERANCE
Calibration Results: IN TOLERANCE
Description: DIGITAL MULTIMETER
Manufacturer: FLUKE
Model Number: 187
Serial Number: 86590148
Technician: MIKE CASOLI
On-Site Calibration: ~
Comments:
Calibration Date:
Calibration Due:
Procedure:
Temperature:
Humidity:
Limiting Attribute:
This instrument has been calibrated using standards traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology, derived from natural physical constants, ratio
measurements or compared to consensus standards. Unless otherwise noted, the method of calibration Is direct comparison to a known standard.
Reported uncertainties and "test uncertainty ratios" (TUR's) are expressed as expanded uncertainty values at approximately 95% confidence level using a coverage
factor of K=2. A TUR of 4:1 is routinely observed unless otherwise noted on the certificate. Statements of compliance are based on test results falling within specified
limits with no reduction by the uncertainty of the measurement.
TjVtl's Quality System is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 and ANSI/NCSL Z540-1 by A2LA. ISO/1 EC 17025 is written in a language relevant to laboratory operations,
meeting the principles of ISO 9001 and aligned with its pertinent requirements. The Instrument listed on this certificate has been calibrated to the requirements of
ANSI/NCSL Z540-1 and TMI's Quality Manual, QM-1.
Results contained in this document relate only to the item calibrated. Calibration due dates appearing on the certificate or label are determined by the client for
administrative purposes and do not imply continued conformance to specifications.
This certificate shall not be reproduced, except In full, without the written permission of Technical Maintenance, inc.
FRANK BAHMANN, BRANCH MANAGER JACK SHULER, QUALITY MANAGER
Calibration Standards
Asset Number Manufacturer Model Number Date Calibrated Cal Due
1727902 FLUKE 5522A/SC1100 10/14/2015 10/14/2016
Rev. 8
6/30/15
Technical Maintenance, Inc.
12530 TELECOM DRIVE. TEMPLE TERRACE, FL 33637
Phone: 813-978-3054 Fax 813-978-3758
www.tmicalibration.corn
ANSI/NCSL Z540-1-1994
-------
Technical Maintenance, Inc.
12530 Telecom Drive
Tampa, FL 33637
ID Number:
Serial Number:
Instrument Data Sheet
01310 Test Run:
85690148 Date Tested:
Fluke
Model: 187
Multimeter
FOUND-LEFT
23 December 2015
Test Results
Test Description True Value Test Result Lower limit I'ppcr limit Units Result Tl'R
DISPLAY OPERATIONAL VERIFICATION
Display Test Pass
BACKLIGHT OPERATIONAL VERIFICATION
Backlight Test Pass
INPUT ALERT OPERATIONAL VERIFICATION
Alert Function / Non-Current Functions Pass
Alert Function OHMS / rnA Input Pass
No Alert Function mAmps / mA Input Pass
KEYPAD OPERATIONAL VERIFICATION
Keypad Buttons Operational Pass
AC VOLTAGE VERIFICATION TEST
4.5000 V 0 20 Hz
4.475B
4.4020
4.5980
V
Pass
4.5000 V 0 45 Hz
4 .4957
4.4780
4.5220
V
Pass
4.5000 V S 1 kHz
4.5027
4.4780
4.5220
V
Pass
4.5000 V 0 10 kHz
4.4997
4.4780
4.5220
V
Pass
4.5000 V 9 20 kHz
4.4961
4.4285
4.5715
V
Pass
4,5000 V @ 100 kHz
4.4467
4.1360
4.8640
V
Pass
45.000 V @ 45 Hz
44.955
44.780
45.220
V
Pass
45.000 V 0 1 kHz
45.026
44.780
45.220
V
Pass
45.000 V 0 10 kHz
45.094
44.780
45.220
V
Pass
45.000 V 0 20 kHz
45.284
44,285
45.715
V
Pass
450.00 V 0 45 Hz
449.51
447,80
452.20
V
Pass
450.00 V 6 1 kHz
450.27
447.80
452.20
V
Pass
450.00 V 0 10 kHz
451.15
447.80
452.20
v
Pass
900.0 V 0 45 Hz
898.6
892.4
907.6
V
Pass
900.0 V @ 1 kHz
900. 0
892. 4
907.6
V
Pass
900.0 V @ 10 kHz
902.8
892.4
907.6
V
Pass
45.0000 mV @ 20 Hz
44 .8540
44 . 0200
45.9800
mV
Pass
45.000 mV 0 45 Hz
45.049
44.780
45.220 mV
Pass
45.000 mV 0 1 kHz
44.940
44.780
45.220 mV
Pass
45.000 mV @ 10 kHz
43.556
42.710
47.290 iV
Pass
45.000 mV @ 20 kHz
43.399
42.4 85
47,515 mV
Pass
45,000 mV 0 100 kHz
41.001
38.210
51.790 BV
Pass
450.00 mV 0 20 Hz
447.61
440.20
459.80 aV
Pass
450.00 mV 0 45 Hz
450.53
447.80
452.20 mV
Pass
450.00 aV 0 1 kHz
449.27
447.80
452.20 mV
Pass
450.00 mV 0 10 kHz
434.50
427.10
472.90 mV
Pass
450.00 mV 0 20 kHz
433.60
424.85
475.15 mV
Pass
450.00 mV 0 100 kHz
431.08
413.60
486.40 mV
Pass
2900.0 mV @ 20 Hz
2876.7
2B34.0
2966.0 bV
Pass
PROCEDURE NAME: FLUKE: 187VOLTMETER DIGITAL 5520A 1 01 06 "5/2Q15
Page 2 of 5
-------
Technical Maintenance, Inc
12530 Telecom Drive
Tampa, FL 33637
Instrument Data Sheet
ID Number:
Serial Number:
01310
85690148
Test Run:
Date Tested:
FOUND-LEFT
23 December 2015
Fluke
Model: 187
Multimeter
Test Results
Test Description
2900.0 raV @
2900.0 mV @
2900.0 mV G
2 900.0 mV @
2900.0 mV @
True Value
45 Hz
1 kHz
10 kHz
20 kHz
100 kHz
Test Result
2891.9
2901.8
2898.6
2895.6
2962.6
Lower limit Unner limit Units Result
2884,4 2915.6 mV Pass
2884.4 2915.6 aV Pass
2884.4 2915.6 mV Pass
2852.5 2947.5 iV Pass
2664.0 3136.0 mV Pass
TUR
FREQUENCY ACCURACY VERIFICATION TEST
20.000 kHz (? 150 mV
20.000
19.998
20.002 kHz
Pass
DC VOLTAGE VERIFICATION TEST
5.0000 V
4,9995
4.9977
5.0023
V
Pass
4.0000 V
3.9996
3.9980
4.0020
V
Pass
3.0000 V
2.9997
2.9982
3.0018
V
Pass
2.0000 V
1.9998
1.9985
2.0015
V
Pass
1.0000 V
0.9998
0.9987
1.0013
V
Pass
-5.0000 V
-4.9993
-5.0023
-4 . 9977
V
Pass
50.000 V
49.994
49.982
50 .018
V
Pass
-50.000 V
-49.993
-50.018
-49.982
V
Pass
500.00 V
499.95
499.48
500.52
V
Pass
-500.00 V
-499.93
-500.52
-499.48
V
Pass
1000.0 V
999. 8
998.8
1001.2
V
Pass
-1000.0 V
-999,7
-1001.2
-998.8
V
Pass
DCV + ACV MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
4.5000 V S 1 kHz
45.000 V B 1 kHz
450.00 V 0 1 kHz
900.0 V 0 1 kHz
4.5031
45.031
450.34
901.B
4.4735
44.735
447.35
891.5
4.5265
45.265
452.65
908.5
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
50.000 mV
-50.000 mV
500.00 mV
-500.00 mV
2900.0 mV
-2900.0 mV
50.003
-49.991
499.99
-499.96
2900.0
-2699.9
4 9.930
-50.070
499.83
-500.17
2898.8
-2901.2
50.070 mV
-49.930 mV
500.17 mV
-499.83 iV
2901.2 iV
-2898.8 mV
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
DCmV+ACmV MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
45.000 mV 0 1 kHz
450.00 mV @ 1 kHz
2900.0 mV 0 1 kHz
44.925
449,18
2902.9
42.350
447.35
2891.5
47.650 mV
452.65 mV
2908.5 mV
Pass
Pass
Pass
RESISTANCE VERIFICATION TEST
PROCEDURE NAME: FLUKE 187VOLTMETER DIGITAL 552GA1 01 06/15/2015
Page 3 of 5
-------
Technical Maintenance, Inc.
12530 Telecom Drive
Tampa, FL 33637
Instrument Data Sheet
ID Number: 01310
Serial Number 85690148
Test Run: FOUND-LEFT
Date Tested: 23 December 2015
Fluke
Model: 187
Multimeter
Test Description
True Value
Test Result
Lower limil
Upper limit Units Result TUR
190,00 Ohm
190.04
1.9000 kOhm
1.9000
19.000 kOhm
19.000
190.00 kOhm
190.00
1.9000 MOhm
1.8997
19.000 MOhm
19,003
100.0 MOhm
99 .8
CONDUCTANCE VERIFICATION TEST
10.00 nS
10.02
AC CURRENT TEST VERIFICATION
189.80
1.8988
18.988
189.88
1.8967
18.806
96.8
9. 80
190.20 R
1.9012 kR
19.012 kR
190.12 kQ
1.9033 HQ
19 .194 MR
103.2 MR
10.20 nS
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
45.000 mA @ 1 kHz
350.00 mA 8 1 kHz
450.00 viA @ 1 kHz
4500.0 pA g 1 kHz
45.047
350.39
450.32
4502.9
44.642
347.32
446.42
4465.7
45.358 m A
352.68 mA
453.58 «A
4534.3 uA
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
DC CURRENT VERIFICATION TEST
45.000 mA
350.00 mA
450.00 pA
4500.0 pA
45,011
350.15
4 50.01
4500.0
44.922
349.45
448.67
4488.5
45.078 mA
350.55 mA
451.33 uA
4511.5 uA
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
AC CURRENT VERIFICATION TEST (cont.)
4 .5000 A @
10.000 A 0
kHz
kHz
4.5039
10.007
4.4305
9.845
4.5695 A
10.155 A
Pass
Pass
DC CURRENT VERIFICATION TEST (cont.)
4.5000 A
10.000 A
4.5003
10.000
4.4765
9. 948
4.5235 A
10.052 A
Pass
Pass
CAPACITANCE VERIFICATION TESTS
0.900 nF
9.10 aF
90.1 nF
1,000 pF
0 .897
9.19
90.1
1.000
0 . 077
8.96
88.7
0,985
0.923 nF
9,24 nF
91.5 nF
1.015uF
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
1.59
PROCEDURE NAME: FLUKE: 187:VOLTMETER DIGITAL 552QA 1.01 06/15/2015
Page 4 of 5
-------
Technical Maintenance, Inc.
12530 Telecom Drive
Tampa, FL 33637
Instrument Data Sheet
Fluke
Model: 187
Multimeter
ID Number:
Serial Number:
01310
85690148
Test Run;
Date Tested:
FOUND-LEFT
23 December 2015
Test Description I rue Value Test Result
TEMPERATURE ACCURACY VERIFICATION
Lmver limit
I'ntier limit Units Result TUR
-10.0 °c
0.0 °C
100.0 °C
350.0 °C
-9.9
-11.1
-8.9
°C
Pass
0 . 0
-1 .0
1.0
°c
Pass
100.1
98.0
102.0
•c
Pass
350.2
345.5
354.5
•c
Pass
***** End of Certificate *****
PROCEDURE NAME: FLUKE 187 VOLTMETER DIGITAL 5520A 1.01.06 15/2015
Page 5 of 5
-------
Certificate Number
A2062914
Issue Date; 12/23/15
Certificate of Calibration
Page 1 of 3
H
Customer ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING & MEASUREMENT SERVICES
1128 NW 39TH DRIVE
GAINESVILLE, FL 32605
FEDEX
Description: DIGITAL MULTIMETER
Manufacturer; FLUKE
Model Number: 287
Serial Number: 95740135
Technician: MIKE CASOLI
On-Site Calibration: | |
Comments:
P.O. Number:
ID Nu
Calibration Date:
Calibration Due:
Procedure:
Temperature:
Humidity:
42/23/2015 /
12/23/2016
METCALFLUKE 287
Rev: 6/15/2015
68 F
42 % RH
As Found ConditionrIN TOLERANCE
Calibration Results: IN TOLERANCE
Limiting Attribute:
This instrument has been calibrated using standards traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology, derived from natural physical constants, ratio
measurements or compared to consensus standards. Unless otherwise noted, the method of calibration is direct comparison to a known standard.
Reported uncertainties and "test uncertainty ratios" (TUR's) are expressed as expanded uncertainty values at approximately 95% confidence level using a coverage
factor of K=2. A TUR of 4:1 is routinely observed unless otherwise noted on the certificate. Statements of compliance are based on test results falling within specified
limits with no reduction by the uncertainty of the 'measurement,
TMI's Quality System is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 and ANSI/NCSL Z54Q-1 by A2LA, ISO/IEC 17025 is written In a language relevant to laboratory operations
meeting the principles of ISO 9001 arid aligned with its pertinent requirements. The instrument listed on this certificate has been calibrated to the requirements of
ANSI/NCSL Z54Q-1 and TMI's Quality Manual, QM-1
Results contained in this document relate only to the item calibrated. Calibration due dates appearing on the certificate or label are determined by the client for
administrative purposes and do not Imply continued conformance to specifications.
This certificate shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written permission of Technical Maintenance, Inc.
< Jc-tt/'-
FRANK BAHMANN, BRANCH MANAGER JACK SHULER, QUALITY MANAGER
Calibration Standards
Asset Number Manufacturer Model Number Date Calibrated Cal Due
1727902 FLUKE 5522A/SC1100 10/14/2015 10/14/2016
Rev. 8
6/30/15
Technical Maintenance, Inc.
12530 TELECOM DRIVE, TEMPLE TERRACE, FL 33637
Phone: 813-978-3054 Fax 813-978-3758
www.tmicalibration.com
ANSI/NCSL Z540-1-1994
-------
Technical Maintenance, Inc.
12530 Telecom Drive
Tampa, FL 33637
Instrument Data Sheet
ID Number:
Serial Number:
01311
95740135
Test Run:
Date Tested:
FOUND-LEFT
23 December 2015
Fluke
Model: 287
Multimeter
~
[Test Results
"l est Description
True Value
Test Result
IDENTIFICATION £ FIRMWARE REVISION
Lower limit
tinner limit Units Result 'tilt
Manufacturer: FLUKE
Model: 2B7
Serial Number: 95740135
Firmware Level: VI.00
TONE WARNING VERIFICATION
Tone Warning Functional
Pass
DCmV MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
0.000 mV
0.025 mV
-0.025 mV
50.000 mV
500.00 mV
-250.00 mV
50.00 mV
0 . 001
0.025
-0 .025
50.001
500.00
-249.99
50.00
-0.020
0.005
-0.045
49.955
499.86
-250.08
49.97
0.020 mV
0.045 mV
-0.005 nV
50.045 mV
500.14 mV
-249,92 mV
50.03 mV
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
DCmV + ACiaV MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
250,00 mV B 35 kHz
248,48
237.10
262,90 mV
Pass
RESISTANCE MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
0.00 Ohm
1.000 Ohm
190.00 ohm
1.90000 kOhm
19.000 kOhra
190.000 kOhm
1.9000 MDhm
10.000 MDhm
100.00 MOhm
190.0100
100.300
0.01
0. 990
190.02
1.90019
19.005
190.000
1.9009
10.007
100.00
-0.10
0.899
189.81
1.89885
18.908
189.895
1.8967
9.846
92.08
0.10
1.101
190.19
1 . 90115
19.012
190.125
1.9032
10.154
108.52
Qs
Qs
Qs
kfls
kRs
kQs
MQs
MRS
MQs
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
ACmV MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
5.000 mV E 20 Hz
50.000 mV @ 65 kHz
50.00 mV d 100 kHz
250.00 mV fi 65 kHz
500.00 mV @ 45 Hz
5.001 4.865 5,135 mV Pass
48.623 48.210 51.790 mV Pass
49.06 47.85 52.15mV Pass
246.61 240.05 259.15mV Pass
499.63 498.25 501.75mV Pass
PROCEDURE NAME FLUKE:267:VOLTMETER DIGITAL 5520A 1.01 06 15/2015
Page 2 of 4
-------
Technical Maintenance, Inc.
12530 Telecom Drive
Tampa, FL 33637
Instrument Data Sheet
ID Number: 01311 Test Run: FOUND-LEFT
Serial Number: 95740135 Date Tested. 23 December 2015
Test Results
Test I)escrintion True Value Test Result Lower limit Upper limit Units Result TUR
FREQUENCY MEASUREMENT; ACCURACY VERIFICATION
45.000 Hz 0 500 ffiV
950.00 kHz 0 600 mV
Fluke
Model: 287
Multimeter
45.000 44.986 45.014 Hz Pass
950.00 949.90 950.10kHz Pass
ACV MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
0.1000
0.5000
3.0000
15.000
500.00
1000.0
60 Hz
10 kHz
100 kHz
100 kHz
10 kHz
10 kHz
0.1010
0.4974
3.0469
15.000
499.41
999.4
0.0952
0.4945
2.8160
14.435
497.75
993.5
0 .1048
0.5055
3.1840
15.565
502.25
1006.5
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
DCV MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
4.0000 V
-40.000 V
400.00 V
600.0 V
4.0000 3.99B8 4.0012 V Pass
-40.000 -40.012 -39.988 V Pass
399.99 399.86 400.14 V Pass
600.0 S99.6 600.4 v Pass
DCV + ACV MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
0.2000 V
2.0000 V 0 5 kHz
0.2001
2.0047
0.1970
1.9660
0.2023 V
2.0340 V
Pass
Pass
DIODE MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
1.0000 V
Beeper is Operational
1.0020
0. 9880
1.0120 V
Pass
Pass
ACIUA MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
500.00 yiA 0 60 Hz 500.18 496.80 503.20uA Pass
500.00 pA @ 10 kHz 500.25 496.80 503.20 uA Pass 1.14
5000.0 iiA 0 10 kHz 5003.1 4969.0 5031.OuA Pass 2.38
DCluA MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
500 00 pA 499.96 499.43 500.57 uA Pass
5000.0 vA 4 999.8 4996.1 5003.9 uA Pass
ACImA MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
PROCEDURE NAME: FLUKE:287:VOLTMETER DIGITAL 5520A 1 01 06 15'2015
Page 3 of 4
-------
Technical Maintenance, Inc.
12530 Telecom Drive
Tampa, FL 33637
Instrument Data Sheet
ID Number:
Serial Number:
01311
95740135
Test Run:
Date Tested:
FOUND-LEFT
23 December 2015
Fluke
Model: 287
Multimeter
I Test Results
Test Description
True Value
Test Result
4.000 mA @ 20 Hz
30.000 mA @ 10 kHz
300.00 mA @ 10 kHz
400.00 mA @ 60 Hz
3. 989
30 ,029
300.37
400.06
Lower limit
3.940
29.600
284.60
397.55
Ilnner limit Units Result TUR
4.060 mA
30.200 mA
315.40 mA
402.45 mA
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
3 .17
DCImA MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
0.100 mA
50.000 mA
400.00 mA
0.102
49,991
399.92
0.090
49.965
399.38
0.110 mA
50 .035 mA
4 00.62 mA
Pass
Pass
Pass
AC I MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
5,0000 A 0
5.000 A 0
kHz
kHz
5.0034
5.001
4.9580
4.955
5.0420
5.045
Pass
Pass
DC I MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
5.0000 A
10.000 A
5.0002
10.001
4.9840
9. 968
5.0160 A
10.032 A
Pass
Pass
TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
0.0 'c
100.0 "c
1000.0 °c
-0.1
99.9
1000.0
-1.0
98.0
989.0
1.0 "C
102.0 °C
1011.0 °C
Pass
Pass
Pass
CAPACITANCE MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
0.900 nF
9.10 nF
90.1 nF
1.000 pF
1,00 pF
0.899
9. 09
09.9
1. 000
1.00
0.986
8. 96
88.7
0.985
0.94
0 . 914 nF
9.24 nF
91.5 nF
1,015 uF
1.06 uF
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
0.97
***** End of Certificate *****
PROCEDURE NAME: FLUKE:287 VOLTMETER DIGITAL:552QA 1 0r0Sn5/2Q15 Page 4 of 4
-------
Certificate Number
A2062915
Issue Date; 12/23/15
Certificate of Calibration
Page 1 oftl
Customer: ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING & MEASUREMENT SERVICES
1128 NW 39TH DRIVE P.O. Nu
GAINESVILLE, FL 32605 |D Num"
FEDEX
01312
Description: DIGITAL MULTIMETER
Manufacturer: FLUKE
Model Number: 287
Serial Number 95740243
Technician: MIKE CASOLI
On-Site Calibration: ~
Comments:
Calibration Date
Calibration Due
Procedure:
Temperature:
Humidity:
:C
12/23/2015
12/23/2016
METCAL FLUKE 287
Rev: 6/15/2015
68 F
42 % RH
As Found Condition^ TOLERANCE
Calibration Results: IN TOLERANCE
Limiting Attribute:
This instrument has been calibrated using standards traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology, derived from natural physical constants ratio
measurements or compared to consensus standards. Unless otherwise noted, the method of calibration is direct comparison to a known standard.
SrrfdkJi''at?in3, f^d1'teSt Utnce!1a'"ty rati°s" (TUR'S> are expressed as expanded uncertainty values at approximately 95% confidence level using a coverage
n0,ed 0M thB CertitotS Sta,emSntS °f
2ST iS ,0 'S°/IEC 17023 and aNSI/NCSL Z540-1 by A2LA, ISO/IEC 17025 Is written In a language relevant to laboratory operations
ANSWCSL Pert'nenl reqUirementS' The inStrUmer" lisled 0n this Certlta,e has to the requirements ol
Results contained In this document relate only to the item calibrated. Calibration due dates appearing on the certificate or label are determined by the client for
administrative purposes and do not imply continued conformance to specifications.
This certificate shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written permission of Technical Maintenance, inc.
FRANK BAHMANN. BRANCH MANAGER
Calibration Standards
Asset Number Manufacturer Model Number
1727902 FLUKE 5522A/SC1100
JACK SHULER, QUALITY MANAGER
Date Calibrated
10/14/2015
Cal Due
10/14/2016
T
Mi
Technical Maintenance, Inc.
Rev 8
630/IS
12530 TELECOM DRIVE, TEMPLE TERRACE. FL 33637
Phone: 813-97S-3G54 Fa* 813-978-3758
www.tmicalibration.com
ANSI/NCSL Z540-1-1994
-------
Technical Maintenance, Inc.
12530 Telecom Orive
Tampa. FL 33637
Instrument Data Sheet
ID Number:
Serial Number:
01312
95740243
Test Run:
Date Tested:
FOUND-LEFT
23 December 2015
Fluke
Model: 287
Multimeter
Test Description
True Value
Test Result
IDENTIFICATION £ FIRMWARE REVISION
Lower limit
[iroer limit Units Result TUR
Manufacturer: FLUKE
Model: 287
Serial Number: 95740243
Firmware Level: VI.00
TONE WARNING VERIFICATION
Tone Warning Functional
Pass
DCmV MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
0.000 mV
0.025 mV
-0.025 HiV
50.000 mV
500.00 mV
-250.00 mV
50,00 mV
0 . 000
0.024
-0.025
50.000
500.01
-249.98
50.02
-0.020
0.005
-0.045
4 9.955
499.86
-250.00
49.97
0.020 mV
0.045 mV
-0.005 mV
50.045 IV
500.14 mV
-249.92 mV
50.03 mV
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
DCfflV + ACmV MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
250,00 mV 0 35 kHz
248.23
237.10
262.90 mV
Pass
RESISTANCE MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
0,00 Ohm
1.000 Ohm
190.00 Ohm
1.90000 kOhm
19.000 kOhm
190.000 kOhm
1.9000 MOhm
10.000 MOhm
100.00 MOhm
189.9700
99.700
0.01
0.990
190.02
1.89989
19,002
190.000
1.8994
9.999
100.00
-0.10
0.899
189.81
1.89885
18.988
189.855
1.B967
9,84 6
91.52
0.10 «s
1.101 Qs
190.19 £3s
1. 90115 kQs
19.012 kfls
190.085 kfis
1.9032 MQs
10.154 MRs
107. 88 MOs
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
ACraV MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
5.000 mV @ 20 Hz
50.000 mV @
50.00 mV @
250.00 mV S
500.00 mV @
65 kHz
100 kHz
65 kHz
45 Hz
4.990
4B.B59
49.05
246.75
499.54
4 . 865
48.210
47.85
240.85
498,25
5.135 mV
51.790 mV
52,15 mV
259.15 mV
501.75 mV
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
PROCEDURE NAME: FLUKE 287 VOLTMETER DIGITAL 5520A 1 01:06/15/2015
Page 2 of 4
-------
Technical Maintenance, Inc.
12530 Telecom Drive
Tampa, FL 33637
ID Number:
Serial Number:
Instrument Data Sheet
01312 Test Run:
95740243 Date Tested:
Fluke
Model: 287
Multimeter
FOUND-LEFT
23 December 2015
Test Results
Test Description True Value Test Result Lower limit Upper limit Units Resull TUR
FREQUENCY MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
45.000 Hz 0 500 mV 45.000 44.986 45.014 Hz Pass
950.00 kHz @ 600 mV 950.00 94 9.90 950.10 kHz Pass
ACV MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
0.1000
V
0
60 Ha
0.0976
0.0952
0.1048
V
Pass
0.5000
V
0
10 kHz
0.4956
0.4945
0.5055
v
Pass
3.0000
V
0
100 kHz
3.1735
2.B160
3.1840
V
Pass
15.000
V
0
100 kHz
14.974
14.435
15.565
V
Pass
500.00
V
0
10 kHz
499.32
497.75
502.25
V
Pass
1000.0
V
0
10 kHz
999.1
993.5
1006.5
V
Pass
DCV MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
4.0000 V 4.0001 3.9988 4.0012 V Pass
-40.000 V -40.001 -40.012 -39.988 V Pass
400.00 V 400.00 399.86 400.14 V Pass
600.0 v 600.0 599.6 600.4 V Pass
DCV + ACV MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
0.2000 V
2.0000 V g 5 kHz
0.1999
2.0038
0.1976
1.9660
0.2023 V
2.0340 V
Pass
Pass
DIODE MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
1.0000 V
Beeper is Operational
1.0081
0.9080
1.0120 V
Pass
pass
ACIuA MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
500.00 nA @ 60 Hz
500.00 jok S 10 kHz
5000.0 yA @ 10 kHz
499.95
500.12
5001.6
496.80
496.80
4969.0
503.20 uA
503.20 uA
5031.0 uA
Pass
Pass 1.14
Pass 2.38
DCIuA MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
500.00 VIA
5000,0 1lA
500.00
5000.0
499.43
4996.1
500.57 pA
5003 . 9 liA
Pass
Pass
ACImA MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
PROCEDURE NAME: FLUKE'287 VOLTMETER DIGITAL 5520A1 01 06 *5.2015
Page 3 of 4
-------
Technical Maintenance, Inc.
12530 Telecom Drive
Tampa, FL 33637
Instrument Data Sheet
ID Number:
Serial Number:
01312
95740243
[Test Results
Test Run:
Date Tested.
FOUND-LEFT
23 December 2015
Fluke
Model; 287
Multimeter
Test Description
True Value
Test Res li H
Lower limit
Upper limit Units Result TUR
4.000 itiA @ 20 Hz
30.000 mA g 10 kHz
300.00 nA |9 10 kHz
400.00 mA S 60 Hz
3.973
30 .019
300.29
399.99
DCImA MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
3.940
29.800
2B4.60
397.55
4.060 mA
30.200 mA
315.40 mA
4 02.45 mA
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
3.17
0.100 mA
50.000 mA
400.00 mA
0.110
49.993
399.99
ACI MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
0.090
49.965
399.3B
0.110 mA
50.035 mA
400.62 mA
Pass
Pass
Pass
5.0000 A 0 1 kHz
5.000 A @ 1 kHz
5.0000 A
10.000 A
5.0030
4 ,998
DC I MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
5.0014
10.003
TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
4.9590
4.955
4.9840
9. 968
5.0420
5 . 045
5.0160
10.032
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
0.0 "c
100.0 °C
1000.0 "C
0.0
100.0
1000.1
CAPACITANCE MEASUREMENT ACCURACY VERIFICATION
-1.0
98.0
989. 0
1.0
102.0
1011.0
'C
*C
°C
Pass
Pass
Pass
0.900 nF
9.10 nF
90.1 nF
1.000 pF
1.00 liF
0.886
9. 08
90.1
1.001
1.00
0 . 886
8.96
88.7
0.965
0.94
0.914 nF
9.24 nF
91.5 nF
1.015 uF
1.06 UF
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
0.97
***** End of Certificate *****
PROCEDURE NAME FLUKE 287 VOLTMETER D1G1TAL5520A 1.01 0615/2015
Page 4 of 4
-------
THE EPPLEY LABORATORY, INC.
12 Sheffield Avenue, PO Box 419, Newport, Rhode Island USA 02840
Phone: 401.847.1020 Fax: 401.847.1031 Email: info@eppleylab.com
Calibration Certificate
fay2 \
Instrument: Precision Spectral Pyranometer, Model PSP, Serial Number 3434] F3
Procedure: I his pyranometer was compared in Eppley's Integrating Hemisphere according to
procedures described in ISO 9847Section 5.3.1 and Technical Procedure, TP01 of
The Eppley Laboratory, lnc.'s Quality Assurance Manual on Calibrations.
Transfer Standard: Eppley Precision Spectral Pyranometer, Model PSP, Serial Number 21231F3
Results:
Traceabiiity:
Due Date:
Sensitivity:
Uncertainty:
Resistance:
Date of Test:
S = 9.41 jiV/ Wm"2
Uss =±0.91% (95% confidence level, k=2)
699 Q at 23 °C 4+
f (MS
December 29, 2015
n\lL
O
*4
This calibration is traeeaW^woJbe^ferhf'ftadiatioii Reference (WRR) through
comparisons with Eppley's AHF standard self-calibrating cavity pyrheliometers
which participated in the Eleventh International Pyrheliometric Comparisons (IPC
XI) at Davos, Switzerland in September-October 2010. Unless otherwise stated in the
remarks section below or on the Sales Order, the results of this calibration are "AS
FOUND / AS LEFT".
Eppley recommends a minimum calibration cycle of five (5) years but encourages
annual calibrations for highest measurement accuracy.
Customer:
EEMS
Gainesville, FL
M.
-------
The Eppley Laboratory, Inc.
12 Sheffield Ave.,P.O. Box 419
Phone# 401-847-1020 Fed. ID No. 05-0136490
Name / Address
EEMS
Att: Erik Hebert
1128 NW 39th Drive
Gainesville, FL 32605
PACKING LIST
S.O, No.
64603
12/30/2015
On ¥S"
Ship To
EEMS
Att: Eric Hebert
1128 NW 39th Drive
Gainesville, FL 32605
it I x°r/ 20 ec
P.O...
Verbal
Ship Date 1/12/2016
Ship Via
UPS COLLECT
Reset Amplifier
Recalibration of Model PSP^ft 311)^ \ (jj C&M, 5\]\jJ(L
CtkbU.
SeV- c^ain so A.V
HDD S
S
HCD UW
^ f-uU
-2.
x/r-a
\ am
V -
r\
\ o I
G
t\C\ -
W
Made in USA
Vf,A\
I
I5.1l
Terms Credit Card
FOB Newport, R1 USA
Ordered
Amount
-------
Site EEMS MOBILE LAB 2
Sensor# PY48645/Transiator# EEMS 01240 SR-RMY Field Uncorrected Corrected
Date&Time
SR-RMY Field Std
Eppley Std
corrected = (x-b)/m
error
error
W/M2
W/M2
W/M2
W/M2
% diff
W/M2
% diff
11/01/2016 11:00
658.71
649.5
656.9
9.21
1.4%
7.4
1.1%
11/01/2016 12:00
691.75
693.4
689.6
-1.65
-0.2%
-3.8
-0.5%
11/01/2016 15:00
112.92
119.5
115.1
-6.58
-5.5%
-4.4
-3.7%
11/01/2016 16:00
51.14
49.2
53.8
1.94
3.9%
4.6
9.3%
12/01/2016 03:00
1.4
-2.4
4.4
3.8
6.8
12/01/2016 08:00
40.84
39.8
43.6
1.04
2.6%
3.8
9.5%
12/01/2016 09:00
59.8
67.2
62.4
-7.4
-11.0%
-4.8
-7.2%
12/01/2016 10:00
297.2
302.5
298.0
-5.3
-1.8%
-4.5
-1.5%
12/01/2016 11:00
624.7
623.2
623.1
1.5
0.2%
-0.1
0.0%
12/01/2016 12:00
669.29
666.7
667.4
2.59
0.4%
0.7
0.1%
12/01/2016 15:00
116.84
124.7
119.0
-7.86
-6.3%
-5.7
-4.6%
Average = -0.79 -16% 0.00 0.00
slope = 1.00748
intercept = -3.05909
200 0C
Adjusted
SR-STD 4 MRU
-------
EEMS# = 01245 01244
Site:AuditVanl Eppley Licor
Date Time SR Std: Value % diff
15/09/2016 10:19 497.7 499.5 0.4%
15/09/2016 10:20 512.3 514.9 0.5%
15/09/2016 10:21 511.0 525.3 2.8%
15/09/2016 10:22 413.9 441.2 6.6%
15/09/2016 10:23 279.5 287.7 2.9%
15/09/2016 10:24 264.8 260.9 -1.5%
15/09/2016 10:25 310.1 300.1 -3.2%
15/09/2016 10:26 295.2 301.1 2.0%
15/09/2016 10:27 258.9 261.7 1.1%
15/09/2016 10:28 252.7 250.2 -1.0%
15/09/2016 10:29 272.1 263.4 -3.2%
15/09/2016 10:30 272.5 273.1 0.2%
15/09/2016 10:31 279.4 274.4 -1.8%
15/09/2016 10:32 284.9 285.9 0.4%
15/09/2016 10:33 291.8 284.0 -2.7%
15/09/2016 10:34 369.8 348.3 -5.8%
15/09/2016 10:35 451.3 468.0 3.7%
15/09/2016 10:36 306.4 317.5 3.6%
15/09/2016 10:37 306.0 297.5 -2.8%
15/09/2016 10:38 325.4 325.8 0.1%
15/09/2016 10:39 317.2 316.6 -0.2%
15/09/2016 10:40 318.6 314.1 -1.4%
15/09/2016 10:41 351.4 355.3 1.1%
15/09/2016 10:42 274.9 284.5 3.5%
15/09/2016 10:43 255.5 255.0 -0.2%
15/09/2016 10:44 255.5 252.0 -1.4%
15/09/2016 10:45 262.9 258.0 -1.8%
15/09/2016 10:46 274.6 268.7 -2.2%
15/09/2016 10:47 284.6 279.0 -1.9%
15/09/2016 10:48 294.2 289.4 -1.7%
15/09/2016 10:49 292.4 289.9 -0.8%
15/09/2016 10:50 282.9 281.0 -0.7%
15/09/2016 10:51 272.5 269.8 -1.0%
15/09/2016 10:52 266.0 261.7 -1.6%
15/09/2016 10:53 271.0 266.0 -1.9%
15/09/2016 10:54 258.0 253.1 -1.9%
15/09/2016 10:55 255.0 249.6 -2.1%
15/09/2016 10:56 253.5 247.4 -2.4%
15/09/2016 10:57 256.7 249.6 -2.8%
15/09/2016 10:58 264.6 255.6 -3.4%
15/09/2016 11:09 345.7 332.6 -3.8%
15/09/2016 11:10 391.1 375.3 -4.0%
-------
15/09/2016
11:11
394.2
395.3
0.3%
15/09/2016
11:12
360.3
354.7
-1.6%
15/09/2016
11:13
371.7
361.9
-2.6%
15/09/2016
11:14
369.6
362.6
-1.9%
15/09/2016
11:15
363.7
359.6
-1.1%
15/09/2016
11:16
355.8
350.1
-1.6%
15/09/2016
11:17
337.1
331.2
-1.7%
15/09/2016
11:18
339.2
328.4
-3.2%
15/09/2016
11:19
343.8
336.2
-2.2%
15/09/2016
11:20
341.6
333.6
-2.3%
15/09/2016
11:21
343.5
334.3
-2.7%
15/09/2016
11:22
341.6
333.6
-2.3%
15/09/2016
11:23
331.0
320.3
-3.2%
15/09/2016
11:24
327.1
317.0
-3.1%
15/09/2016
11:25
325.4
313.1
-3.8%
15/09/2016
11:26
356.2
324.6
-8.9%
15/09/2016
11:27
470.4
462.2
-1.7%
15/09/2016
11:28
483.0
445.8
-7.7%
15/09/2016
11:29
440.4
476.5
8.2%
15/09/2016
11:30
334.0
321.0
-3.9%
15/09/2016
11:31
457.3
413.7
-9.5%
15/09/2016
11:32
487.2
457.7
-6.1%
15/09/2016
11:33
522.9
512.9
-1.9%
15/09/2016
11:34
457.1
447.2
-2.2%
15/09/2016
11:35
562.2
549.5
-2.3%
15/09/2016
11:36
586.4
558.9
-4.7%
15/09/2016
11:37
627.7
624.0
-0.6%
15/09/2016
11:38
629.2
622.9
-1.0%
15/09/2016
11:39
599.4
589.9
-1.6%
15/09/2016
11:40
615.9
607.9
-1.3%
15/09/2016
11:41
616.6
607.6
-1.5%
15/09/2016
11:42
617.8
608.9
-1.4%
15/09/2016
11:43
618.2
610.2
-1.3%
15/09/2016
11:44
619.7
611.4
-1.3%
15/09/2016
11:45
620.9
612.3
-1.4%
15/09/2016
11:46
624.2
616.0
-1.3%
15/09/2016
11:47
626.6
619.0
-1.2%
15/09/2016
11:48
630.9
623.1
-1.2%
15/09/2016
11:49
637.8
629.8
-1.3%
15/09/2016
11:50
648.3
639.5
-1.4%
15/09/2016
11:51
656.8
648.6
-1.3%
15/09/2016
11:52
666.1
658.2
-1.2%
15/09/2016
11:53
670.6
663.6
-1.0%
15/09/2016
11:54
676.6
670.0
-1.0%
15/09/2016
11:55
645.6
644.0
-0.3%
15/09/2016
11:56
674.6
662.9
-1.7%
15/09/2016
11:57
683.3
677.0
-0.9%
-------
15/09/2016
11:58
680.8
15/09/2016
12:01
675.0
15/09/2016
12:02
693.8
15/09/2016
12:03
660.6
15/09/2016
12:04
484.8
15/09/2016
12:05
501.0
15/09/2016
12:06
641.8
15/09/2016
12:07
660.9
15/09/2016
12:08
660.8
15/09/2016
12:09
662.7
15/09/2016
12:10
662.3
15/09/2016
12:11
662.8
15/09/2016
12:12
661.6
slope (m) =
0.99140
intercept(b) =
-2.3
681.0
0.0%
660.8
-2.1%
687.4
-0.9%
683.8
3.5%
470.5
-2.9%
476.4
-4.9%
627.0
-2.3%
650.4
-1.6%
654.1
-1.0%
655.7
-1.1%
655.8
-1.0%
657.2
-0.8%
654.9
-1.0%
average =
-1.4%
------- |