U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, REGION V
POLLUTION/SITUATION REPORT #211
KALAMAZOO RIVER/ENBRIDGE SPILL - REMOVAL
SITE # Z5JS
MARSHALL, MICHIGAN
LATITUDE: 42.2395273; LONGITUDE: -84.9662018
Dredging Operations in the Morrow Lake Neck (07/30/2014)
Page 1 of 7

-------
To:
Susan Hedman, U.S. EPA Regional Administrator
James Sygo, MDEQ
Michelle DeLong, MDEQ
Dr. Linda Dykema, MDCH
Deb Cardiff, Kalamazoo County Public Health
Richard Fuller, Kalamazoo County Sheriffs Office
James Rutherford, Calhoun County Public Health Department
Durk Dunham, Calhoun County Emergency Management
Scott Corbin, Allegan County Emergency Management
Tiffany Eichorst, City of Battle Creek
Cheryl Vosburg, City of Marshall
Christine Kosmowski, Calhoun County Water Resources Commissioner
Ann Nieuwenhuis, Comstock Township
From:
Date:
Operational Periods:
Reporting Period:
Jeffrey Kimble, U.S. EPA, Federal On-Scene Coordinator
08/29/2014
0700 hours 07/21/2014 through 0700 hours 07/28/2014
0700 hours 07/28/2014 through 0700 hours 08/04/2014
0700 hours 07/21/2014 through 0700 hours 08/04/2014
/. Site Data
Site Number:
Response Authority:
Response Lead:
Mobilization Date:
FPN#:
Z5JS
OPA
RP
7/26/2010
E10527
Response Type:
Incident Category:
NPL Status:
Start Date:
Emergency
Removal Action
Non-NPL
7/26/2010
2. Operations Section
•	The organizational response structure consisted of the following Divisions/Groups: 1) Water Operations;
2) Morrow Lake; and 3) Waste Management.
2.1 Water Operations Group
•	Enbridge continued to monitor and maintain the E4 containment system in the Morrow Lake Delta
throughout the reporting period.
•	Enbridge continued to monitor and maintain the Ceresco pilot channel containment. River margin
restoration work continued throughout the reporting period.
•	Monthly Walling tube sampling and reinstallation was conducted on July 28 - 30, 2014 in accordance
with the 2013 Submerged Oil Removal and Assessment Work Plan.
•	On July 31, 2014, a sheen response was conducted in the Morrow Lake North Cove in response to
observations of spontaneously appearing sheen in the area.
Page 2 of 7

-------
2.2	Morrow Lake Division
On-water dredging activities in the Morrow Lake Delta/Neck and at the MP 36.10 sediment trap were
conducted throughout the reporting period with four to five dredges. Morrow Lake Delta dredge pad
operations also continued throughout the reporting period. As of the close of the reporting period,
approximately 67,772 cubic yards of impacted materials were removed from the Morrow Lake Delta,
representing approximately 71% of the required dredging. Approximately 128,000,000 gallons of water
have been treated and discharged in accordance with Enbridge's NPDES permit during the 2014
dredging operations in the Morrow Lake Division.
Enbridge continued daily dredge pad perimeter air monitoring for particulates throughout the reporting
period. U.S. EPA also conducted periodic perimeter air monitoring for particulates. No exceedances of
the MDCH or U.S. EPA 24-hour average concentration for particulates occurred during the reporting
period related to dredge pad operations.
Enbridge continued daily air monitoring using a 5-gas meter throughout the community immediately
adjacent and east of the Morrow Lake Delta dredge pad. U.S. EPA conducted air monitoring within the
community using handheld particulate monitoring units.
2.3	Waste Management Division
Enbridge completed decommissioning and site restoration activities at the Frac Tank City
decontamination pad.
Transportation and disposal of dredged sediment from the Del Tank began on July 22, 2014 and
continued throughout the reporting period.
Cumulative quantities of soil, debris, and liquid shipped off-site during the response are presented in
Tables 1 and 2.
The cumulative quantity of recovered oil has been estimated using actual waste stream volumes,
analytical data, and physical parameters of oil-containing media. A summary of the estimated volume of
recovered oil is presented in Table 3.
3. Planning Section
3.1	Situation Unit
During the reporting period, overflights were conducted on July 23 and 30, 2014 to document all
operational areas and river conditions, including locations of sheening. Photographs were taken and
distributed to project participants in a weekly Situation Update photograph log and during the weekly
Consolidated ICS Meeting.
3.2	Environmental Unit
U.S. EPA, USGS, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers held weekly meetings to discuss
Hydrodynamic Model (HDM) activities. Development of the HDM and sediment transport model
continued throughout the reporting period.
Page 3 of 7

-------
3.3 Documentation Unit
The Documentation Unit continued organizing and archiving electronic and paper files for post-incident
use.
3.4 Resource Unit
The Resources Unit continued to support production of the Incident Action Plan (IAP), supported the
planning efforts of operations, and provided information to Logistics personnel in order to properly
prepare and procure resources.
4. C oiiimand
4.1	Safety Officers
Enbridge safety personnel continued conducting work-site safety inspections and implementing the plan
for integration of public safety and worker safety on the Kalamazoo River.
The USCG is providing the U.S. EPA with on-site support by monitoring safety throughout all active
work areas.
4.2	Public Information
The number of public inquires reported by Enbridge for this period is presented in Table 5.
x Finance
The current National Pollution Funds Center (NPFC) ceiling is $69.25 million. Approximately 91.3% of
the ceiling has been spent through August 3, 2014. The latest average 14-day burn rate was $22,761 per
day. These cost summaries reflect only U.S. EPA-funded expenditures for the incident. A summary of
these expenses is presented in Table 6.
(>. Scientific Support C oonlination (ironp (SSC (i)
No activities were conducted during this operational period.
Participating Untitles
U.S. EPA and MDEQ continued meeting bi-weekly with a group of stakeholders to discuss how to
continue to effectively communicate, share information about site progress, and receive feedback about
the communication needs of the local communities. The Stakeholder group did not meet during this
reporting period.
For a list of cooperating and assisting agencies, see SITREP #51 (Sections 3.2 and 3.3).
-------
(). Source of. Uhlitional Information
• For additional information, refer to http ://www.epa.gov/enbridgespill. For sampling analysis data, see
http://response.enbridge.com/response/.
10. Clean-up Progress Metrics
Table 1 - Soil and Debris S
lipped Off Site (as of 08/03/2014)
Waste Stream
Cumulative
Disposal Facility
Haz Soil (yd')
19.644
luivirosiiic (Oregon. Oil)
Non-Haz Soil (yd3)
266,365
SET/C&C
Non-Haz Soil (yd3)
4,476
SET/Ottawa County Farms
Non-Haz Soil (yd3)
14,673
SET/WM Westside
Non-Haz Soil Debris (yd')
(Excluding 2010 Ceresco Dredge)
64.815
We si side Recycling (Three
Rivers. Mil
Non-Haz Soil (yd)
(2010 Ceresco Dredge Only)
5.56)2
/¦(J Republic /Marshall. Mil
Haz Debris (yd3)
12.075
TXJ Michigan Disposal (Wayne.
MI) and Republic (Marshall, MI)
Non-Haz Household Debris (ton)
2,538
SET/C&C
Non-Haz Impacted Debris (ton)
15,543
Shaded and italicized ilonis arc discontinued waste streams.
Table 2 - Liquid Shipped Off-Site (as of 08/03/2014)
Stream
Destination Company
Destination Location
Cumulative Volume
(gallons)f
Non-Haz Water
Liquid Industrial Waste
Holland, MI
1,557,407
Non-Haz Water
Plummer
Kentwood, MI
936,009
\on-llaz Water
I >viiecol
Del roil. Ml
981.79 2
\on-llaz Wilier
Hal lie ( 'reel I'OIW
Hal lie ('reel. MI
1.143.280
Hazardous Wilier
I htiecol
Detroit. MI
3.594.579
OH
Other Material
Knbridge T'acilily
(iriffith. IN
766.288
1.405.525
/rciitcil \on-Ihiz Water
Liquid Industrial Waste
Holland. MI
3 -a.:/hi
/rental Sott-Haz Wafer
Plummer
Ketitu ooil. Ml
4.976.140
Hazardous Water
Safely Kleen "

825
/rciiicil \on-Haz Water
I >YIICCol
Detroit. Ml
150.700
/rciiicil \oii-lhiz Water
Hat lie ( 'reel I'OIW
Hat lie ('reck. Ml
1.968.700
Total
17,851,445
Shaded and italicized ilonis arc discontinued waste streams.
¦f Cumulative quantities may not reconcile with previous reports (due to auditing).
a New Age lab water and methanol mix generated by mobile laboratory.
Page 5 of 7
-------
Table 3 - Estimated Recovered Oil (as of 08/04/2014)
Waste Stream Containing
Recovered Oil
Destination
Company
Destination
Location
Estimated Oil Volume in
Waste Stream (gallons)
Soil - Sediment
Impacted Soil & Debris
C&C Landfill
Marshall, MI
27,473*
Envirosafe/ Westside
RDF
Oregon, OH
278,665
(ieotube Sediment - llm/hicicd
Sediment)
Envirosafe
II esisiile l\l '/¦
Oregon. OH
1.298
Debris - (Roll Off Boxes with
Impacted Sorbents, boom, pads,
plastic, PPE, vegetation, and
biomass)
EQ Michigan
Belleville, MI
62,516*
I'rac lank City - liiilnciit in
('arhon lull ration System
('&(' Landfill
Marshall. MI
(S. 109

Dynecol
Detroit, MI

Frac Tank City - Water
Liquid Industrial
Waste Services, Inc.
Kentwood, MI
46,183
Plummers Env. Inc.
Holland, MI


BCPOTW
Battle Creek, MI

C ereseo I'retreatment System
( VH' Landfill
Marshall. MI
90
.1-/ I'retreatmeiit System
('&(' Landfill
Marshall. MI
9
Oily Water - RPP
Enbridge Facility
Griffith, IN
766,288
Total
1,190,631
Shaded and italicized items represent discontinued waste streams.
*Total updated for analytical received after report generation
Table 4 - Samples Collected By Enbridge
Sample Type
Total
c
uly/August 2014

2
1
31
30
29
28
27
26
25
24
23
22
21
20
Surface Water
18
0
0
0
0
0
18
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Private Well
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Groundwater
36
0
0
9
7
0
0
0
0
4
2
8
0
0
6
Sediment
20
0
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil
40
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
26
5
8
0
0
Product
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Dewatering
34
0
0
0
0
16
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
Sheen
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Table 5 - Public Inquiries Received by Enbridge

Ju
y/August 2014
Location/Med
1
31
30
29
28
27
26
25
24
23
22
21
20
19
Marshall Community Center
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Oil Spill Public Information Hotline
1
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Website
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Public Inquiries
1
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 6 of 7
-------
Table 6 - Financial Summary (as of 08/03/2014)
Item
Expended (Cumulative)
LRUS ('ontractors


i-.oM m."
s
1.199.522

s
2/3.636
/..i/.i (i:rs?uxu4i mi'j
s
I.I 61.082
i:i\ IK ' (i:/'S.vrjtO) K>4(i
s
683.330
Total KitItS Contractors
s
3.257.5'7I
Other C ontractors


LockheedMartin (i'.TWo'to}!) /.Id. 1 Su/>/>ori
s
198.3 79
Lockheed Martin (KPW09031) -Biodegradcibility Study

61.917
/a- / insso ii:r.i nssoooos)
s
882.087
Total Other ( ontractors
s
IJ 42,383
START Contractor - WESTON (EPS5ut>u4j


T030-Response
Community Relations
T032-Sampling
T037-Doc Support
$
$
$
39,445,583
114,563
161,045
2.074.012
Total START Contractor
$
41,795,203
Response Contractor Sub-Totals
$
46,201,829
U.S. EPA Funded Costs: Total U.S. EPA Costs
$ 7,110,734
Pollution Removal Funding Agreements
Total Other Agencies
$ 3,637,081
Indirect Cost (16.00%)
$
3,520,519
Indirect Cost (8.36%)-payments after 10/1/2011
$
1,310,859
Indirect Cost (10.15%)-payments after 10/1/2012
$ 1,541,517
Cost Documentation/Billing Admin Fee (2.93%)*
$
678,790


Total Est. Oil Spill Cost
$
63,232,755
Oil Spill Ceiling Authorized by USCG
$
69,250,000
Oil Spill Ceiling Available Balance
$
6,017,245
Shaded and italicized items are discontinued
* Effective on EPA Enbridge costs billed to USCG for bills issued after 6/5/12.
Table 7 - Personnel On-Site
Agency/Entity
August 2014
July 2014
3
2
1
31
30
29
28
27
26
25
24
23
22
21
U.S. EPA
0
0
2
3
3
3
3
0
0
1
2
2
2
3
START
1
8
14
14
14
14
14
0
6
14
14
14
14
13
MDEQ
0
1
2
3
4
4
4
0
1
4
10
7
4
4
MDEQ Contractors
0
2
2
3
3
3
3
0
1
1
2
3
3
3
Other Agencies
0
2
2
2
3
3
3
0
3
4
3
3
3
3
Enbridge -Water Ops*
0
0
2
2
2
2
2
0
0
2
2
2
2
2
Enbridge -Delta/Morrow
Lake*
6
100
117
115
118
121
117
5
114
116
122
137
126
123
Enbridge - Waste
Management*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Enbridge - Office Support*
5
15
33
40
39
40
39
1
15
39
42
44
44
44
Total
12
128
174
182
186
190
185
6
140
181
197
212
198
195
*Enbridge Operations and Field include Enbridge and contractors as reported by Enbridge
Page 7 of 7
-------