^6D srx
i o %
33 \ ^	REGION 8 PRE
<$*,	Volume IV No. 2
% PRO^°
Heavy Winter Snow Brings
Spring Flooding Potential
PAREDNESS
Quarterly Newsletter 2014
According to NOAA's Spring Outlook, rivers in half of the continental United States are at minor or
moderate risk of exceeding flood levels this spring. The highest threat is in the southern Great Lakes
region due to above-average snowpack and a deep layer of
frozen ground. In contrast, drought is expected to continue
in California and the Southwest.
The continuation of winter storms into the Spring, above-
average snowpack, frozen ground and thick ice coverage on
streams and rivers will delay Spring flooding into April and
May in the upper Midwest eastward to New England. The
intensity of the flooding will depend on the rate of snow and
ice melt, and future rainfall.
Continued well-below average temperatures this winter
resulted in significant river ice formation and ice jams in
locations further south than customary, flooding homes and
businesses, and impacting river commerce. There is also an
elevated risk of more ice jams this Spring in the northern
tier of the U.S. from Montana eastward to northern New
England.
"This year's spring flood potential is widespread and includes rivers in highly populated areas putting
millions of Americans at risk," said Louis Uccellini, Ph.D., director of NOAA's National Weather Service
(NWS). "Although widespread major river flooding is not expected, an abrupt warming or heavy rainfall
event could lead to isolated major flooding."
NWS hydrologists predict moderate flooding in parts of southern Wisconsin, southern Michigan and portions
of Illinois, Indiana, and Iowa as a result of the current snowpack and the deep layer of frozen ground
coupled with expected seasonal temperatures and rainfall. At risk are the Mississippi River and the Illinois
River as well as many smaller rivers in these regions. Some streams and rivers in Montana and Wyoming
along with the lower Missouri basin in Missouri and eastern Kansas have already experienced flooding this
year and the threat of moderate flooding will persist through the remainder of the Spring.
There is a risk of moderate flooding along the Red
River of the North between eastern North Dakota and
northwest Minnesota, and along the Souris River
below Minot, ND. River ice, snowpack and significant
frozen ground are factors in the flood risk for this
area. Additionally, there is a risk of moderate
flooding for western South Dakota because of current
saturated soils.
Minor flooding is likely in the northern Rockies, parts
of the Midwest, and the Great Lakes region. Minor
flooding is also possible in the Northeast, the lower
Mississippi River basin, and across the entire
Southeast up to Virginia, including east Texas, and
parts of Arkansas, Tennessee, Kentucky, West
Virginia and the Florida panhandle. In these areas,
spring flood risk is highly dependent on rainfall.
Contents
Do Emergency Alert Notifications Fail to Live
Up to Expectations: Page 3
Enhanced TRIP2 Toot: Page 4
HAZWOPER Training: Page 5
New ESC in Pueblo: Page 5
Update on EO 13650: Page 6
Training & Exercises: Page 6
Railroads Agree to Slow Down Crude Oil
Trains in Major Cities: Page 7
Upcoming PREP Exercise: Page 9
Oil Regulations Workshop/Webinar: Page 10
Risk Management Program Webinars Page 11

-------
Page 2
Heavy Winter Snow Brings
Spring Flooding Potential (cont.)
NOAA's Spring Outlook identifies areas at
risk of spring flooding and expectations for
temperature, precipitation and drought
from April through June. March 16-22 was
National Flood Safety Awarenpss Waek.
and NOAA encourages individuals to
become weather-ready by ensuring you
have real-time access to flood warnings via
mobile devices, weather radio and local
media, and avoiding areas that are under
these warnings. Empowering people with
the information they need to take action to
protect life and property is key to NOAA's
effort to build a Weather-Ready Nation.
Temperature and Precipitation Outlook
Below-normal temperatures this spring are
favored for an area from Montana eastward
across the northern Plains to the Great
Lakes region, while warmer-than-normal
temperatures are most likely for western
sections of Washington and Oregon,
California, the desert Southwest, the
southern Plains, the Southeast and ail of
Alaska which will likely exacerbate the
ongoing drought in that region of the U.S.
Mountain Snowpack
as of April 1, 2014
Percent of
1981-2010 Median
•	> 180
•	150 -180
•	130-149
O	110-129
«	90-109
O	70-89
O 50-69
•	25-49
•	<25
Prepared by:
US DA Natural Resources Conservation Service
National Water and Climate Center
Portland, Oregon
http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov
Created 4 Apr 2014 08:15
For precipitation, odds favor drier-than-normal conditions for the Alaska panhandle, western
Washington and Oregon, California and parts of Nevada and Arizona.
Recent flood events in areas with oil and gas operations have highlighted problems associated with
above ground storage tanks (ASTs) when facilities are impacted by high water. ASTs that had releases
of product due to flooding and storm surge eventually floated downstream. This is directly due to the
surface-area-to-weight-ratio of the tanks and their contents to the external water level. Once the
external water level becomes equal to or greater than the weight of the product in the tank, the tank
becomes buoyant. Typically, tanks that survived flood events had significant product in them and/or
were securely anchored to the ground.
A rule of thumb, is that the contents in an AST should be at least three feet above the projected flood
water level expected by a storm surge or flood event. This will help prevent floatation and
subsequent product releases. The density of the product in the tank is also of critical importance in
determining the risk of tank floatation. Response plans for facilities located in flood prone areas must
address these issues. The height of secondary containment, as well as piping and valves, must also
be addressed in the plan. If flood forecasts allow sufficient time, the best practice is for tanks and
piping to be securely anchored to the ground and be either emptied or filled with water to minimize
risk of product releases.

-------
Page 3
Do Emergency Alert Notifications Fail
To Live Up To Expectations?
SYSTEM
REVERSE 9-1-1
¦SM
By: Rick Wimberly http://www.emeraenevmamt.com/disaster/
Wildfires that threatened lives arid property of Colorado residents in
El Paso and Teller counties in 2012 were the most destructive
- fl wildfires in state history — 29 square miles around Colorado
Springs burned, destroying more than 340 homes, and causing two
[1 deaths and personal property damage in excess of 352 million
dollars.
mo facilitate evacuations, authorities used a jointly operated
telephone alerting system and made fire-related calls to the public
in the Waldo Canyon area on 48 different occasions
Using this system, more than 32,000 people were evacuated from
their homes, but the limits of automated telephone alerting systems were clearly exposed. Efforts to call
at least 20,000 homes failed, and some residents said they never received a call to
evacuate.
The problems with the Waldo Canyon telephone alerts have attracted attention because of the situation's
seriousness, but the same types of challenges have been reported nationwide. The telephone alerting
systems' main problems can be broken down into two general, yet contradictory, categories:
-	In some situations, officials did not have residents' telephone numbers, making calls impossible.
-	In other cases, something went wrong with the local automated notification system and calls weren't
delivered, perhaps because too many calls were being made.
Lack of telephone numbers is often a byproduct of the fact that many homes no longer have land lines.
Where land lines are used, obtaining telephone numbers isn't difficult. Databases can be purchased that
include most land line telephone numbers, including unlisted numbers through the same databases used
by 9-1-1 centers to help identify a caller's location. Even as people replace their traditional land lines
served through a telephone company with voice over Internet protocol (VoIP), land line numbers are
generally available. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) ensured this by requiring that VoIP
phone numbers be published.
Even with increases in VoIP lines, the number of land lines has dropped while the number of cellphones
has increased significantly. Because there's no central repository of cellphone numbers, local public
safety officials don't have these numbers to call. Cell phone companies are not required to disclose their
customers' phone numbers.
One of the organizations that faces the realities of telephone alerting and has been successful in working
around some of the obstacles is the New York State Office of Emergency Management (OEM).
The OEM created its own alerting system and is offering it to other states for use. The system, called NY-
Alert, has more than 5.8 million people in its alerting database. More than 1.7 million have signed up to
receive alerts through the system. "Through multimember households and in the workplace, the message
will reach the general population that has not yet subscribed," said OEM spokesman Dennis Michalski,
adding that although there has been a push to inform the public about NY-Alert, most of the citizens
who signed up for the notifications heard about it by word of mouth.
As part of efforts to reach people who have not signed up for NY-Alert, the New York OEM plans to
become part of FEMA's Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS). Through IPAWS ditto://
www.fema.gov/intearated-public-alert-warnina-svstem). the office will send short alert messages to
mobile devices, even devices owned by those who have not signed up to receive alerts.

-------
Page 4
Do Emergency Alert Notifications.... (cont.)
The IPAWS program, the Commercial Mobile Alerting System (CMAS), will send Wireless Emergency
Alerts (WEAs) through the cell system and establish relationships with many of the cell carriers in the
United States. The CMAS-WEA (http://www.fcc.aov/auides/wireless-emeraencv-alerts-wea) initiative
iaunched earlier this year, with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) National
Weather Service (NWS) being the first major organization to start issuing alerts through the system.
A process was unveiled this year for local and state!
authorities to obtain authority to start using CMAS.
Agencies first apply to the IPAWS office and then to
their state. Many of the vendors that provide
telephone alerting solutions to public safet
organizations are either adapting or planning to
adapt their solutions so their customers can send
alerts through IPAWS in addition to using telephone
calls, emails, text messages and other alerting tools.
And the number of mobile devices in the public's
hands that are equipped to receive WEAs is growing.
IPAS Director Antwane Johnson admitted that CMAS|
doesn't solve all of the alerting challenges as i
currently only provides short text messages to onl
mobile devices — and only under certain conditions.
Johnson said CMAS is part of a comprehensive
alerting system that the IPAWS program is creating that will include other alerting tools. Among them are
the Emergency Alert System, approaches for alerting people with disabilities, and Web-based alerts.
"Even as IPAWS grows," Johnson said, "it will not replace existing state and local alerting initiatives but
rather enhance them."
http://www.emeraencvmamt.com/disaster/Do-Alert-Notifications-Fail-Expectations.html
Enhanced Toxic Release Inventory (TRI)
Pollution Prevention (P2) Search Tool
The following TRI website (http://www.epa.aov/enviro/facts/tri/
p2.html) provides a quick and easy way to find information on
toxic releases from a facility. The updated and enhanced website
now allows a user to graphically compare facilities within th
same industry using a variety of environmental metrics for
and the Greenhouse Gas Reporting System.
successes.
Everyone has the right to know the chemicals to which they may
be exposed to in their daily lives. Right-to-know laws provide
information about possible chemical exposures. Under the Pollution
Prevention Act of 1990 (PPA), the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI)
collects information to track industry progress in reducing waste
generation and moving towards safer waste management
alternatives. When providing this information, many facilities
choose to describe the measures they have taken to prevent
pollution and reduce the amount of toxic chemicals entering the
environment. As a result, TRI serves as a tool for identifying
effective environmental
practices and highlighting
pollution prevention

-------
Page 5
40-Hour Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency
Response (HAZWOPER) Training
'JOUlWC
I0&2Q
OUHX
P3I.
The Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response
(HAZWOPER) Standard applies to five distinct groups of
employers and their employees. This includes any employees
who are exposed or potentially exposed to hazardous
substances - including hazardous waste - and who are
engaged in one of the following operations as specified by
1910.120faKlHi-v) and 1926.65faKlKi-v^:
•	Clean-up operations that are conducted at uncontrolled
hazardous waste sites;
•	Corrective actions involving clean-up operations at sites
covered by the Resource Conservation and Recover Act (RCRA);
•	Voluntary clean-up operations at uncontrolled hazardous waste sites;
•	Operations involving hazardous wastes that are conducted at Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Facilities (TSDFs) regulated by 40 CFR 264 & 265; or
•	Emergency response operations for releases of hazardous substances regardless of the location of the
hazard.
40-hour HAZWOPER training classes are being held in Silverton, Colorado, on May 7 to 11, 2014 and in
Commerce City, Colorado, on June 23 to 27, 2014. The Silverton class will be held at the Kendal
Mountain Community Center. The exact location of the Commerce City class has not yet been finalized.
Prospective students should send their contact information to Mark Wullstein at Wullstein.mark@epa.aov
to register for either course. Students will need to have a physician sign a medical release that they are
capable of performing duties while wearing a respirator. The courses are free to Federal, Tribal, state
and local employees. The classes are filling up quickly, so those interested should respond as soon as
possible.
New Pueblo Emergency Services Center
Pueblo County Sheriff, Kirk Taylor addressed a gathering of officials and the public at the dedication of
the new Emergency Services Center (ESC) in Pueblo, Colorado, on April 9.
"Some projects start and just as quickly, you can't see the end. They get overrun or side tracked, they
lose funding, importance or momentum but that wasn't the case here. From start to finish, we have had
such amazing partnerships at the local, state,
and federal level that - once the building and the
location were approved, this project took on a
life of its own."
"This building was thoughtfully designed for
function by the staff themselves. Every piece of
furniture, technology, and even the proximity of
the rooms to one another was painstakingly
decided upon to make sure the men and women
who staff it, both on a daily basis and in an
emergency, can do their jobs quickly and
effectively."
"Because what they do in this building makes a difference. Lives will be saved by the people who sit
inside these walls. Millions and millions will be spent to protect our community from destruction. Property
owners will hear great news and tragic news on the calls made from the phone inside this ESC."

-------
Page 6
Update on Executive Order 13650
Improving Chemical Facility Safety and Security

On August 1, 2013, President Obama issued Executive Order (EO) 13650 - Improving Chemical Facility
Safety and Security. The Executive Order created a Working Group which had, among its responsibilities,
the requirement to keep interested parties updated on the outcomes of the orders mandates. A progress
report was due 135 days after the EO was issued. The 135-day Progress Fact Sheet is available at
https://www.osha.aov/chemicalexecutiveorder/EO ProaressUpdate022014.pdf. This report provides an
update to the December 20, 2013, Progress Fact Sheet and addresses improvements in chemical facility
safety and security, specifically stakeholder input, operational coordination with State, local, and Tribal
partners, and efforts to modernize policies, programs, and requirements.
Among recommendations of the Working Group in this update are: (1) the need to verify that emergency
plans for security incidents are developed and coordinated with local law enforcement and first
responders; (2) assessing the feasibility of reviving the Federal Integrated Contingency Plan (ICP, also
known as the "One Plan") reporting form to decrease duplicative reporting and streamline information
collection; and (3) to the extent possible, including Local Emergency Planning Committees (LEPCs) in
Federal safety inspections at regulated facilities.
Through this Progress Fact Sheet the Working Group is specifically inviting public input on actions
described in the document.
If you have any questions or comments regarding EO 13650, please visit https://www.osha.aov/
chemicalexecutiveorder/index.html for more information, or email EO.chemical@ha.dhs.aov.
Training & Exercises
Region 8 has created the annual 2014 Training and
Exercise Plan (TEP) to address our current priorities and
methodologies in training and exercise (T&E) activities.
A schedule listing of our regional trainings and exercises
is developed for each year showing the type of T&E,
location, time, sponsor, participants and regional
priorities being addressed. The 2014 schedule is
available at:
http://www2.epa.aov/sites/production/files/2014-02/
documents/copy of r8 exercise list 2014.pdf
Region 8 is working with Spectra Energy to conduct a
tabletop and full-scale National Preparedness for
Response Exercise Program (PREP) at Spectra's facility
in Casper, Wyoming, on May 14 and 15, 2014. See
Page 9 of this newsletter for details on the exercise.
Please contact Luke Chavez, Exercise Coordinator, at 303-312-6512 or chavez.luke@epa.aov if you have
any questions regarding EPA Region 8 T&E or have an exercise with which you would like our assistance
or participation.

-------
Page 7
Railroads Agree to Slow Down
Crude Oil Trains in Major Cities
Federal regulators and American railroads have agreed to voluntary changes that could make shipping crude oil by rail safer, including slowing down
trains in major cities by at least 10 miles per hour.
Under the agreement between the U.S. Department of Transportation and the Association of American Railroads, operators will also inspect tracks
more frequently and pay to boost emergency planning along their routes. Federal regulators say these voluntary changes are paving the way for more
regulation since a dramatic increase in rail traffic hauling domestic crude oil has resulted in recent accidents on tracks across the country - including
North Dakota and Pennsylvania.
"Safety is our top priority, and we have a shared responsibility to make sure crude oil is transported safely from origin to destination," U.S.
Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx said in a statement to the Associated Press, http://www.huffinGtonpost.com/2014/Q2/21/railroad-crude-oii-
safetv-measures n 4831766.html. The agreement came just a week after an oil train derailed in western Pennsylvania, spilling thousands of gallons
of heavy crude, https://stateirnpact.nor.ora/aennsvlvania/2014/02/13/train-carrving-crude-oil-derails-in-western-pa/
This past December, a train carrying grain derailed and collided with another train that was carrying crude oil in Casselton, North Dakota, resulting in
a fire and explosion. In July 2013 the brakes failed on a crude oil train parked overnight in Lac Megantic, Quebec, resulting in a deadly explosion and
fire. In January, a train carrying crude oil derailed on a bridge that spans a major interstate highway and the Schuylkill River in eastern Pennsylvania.
http://stateimpact.npr.ora/pennsvlvania/2014/01/22/close-call-on-phillv-oil-train-derailment-fuels-calls-for-safetv/
"It does seem pretty obvious that one should look at the problem (of transporting crude oil) in all its aspects," says Phil Rinaldi, CEO of Philadelphia
Energy Solutions (PES), a refining and distribution company in the eastern United States.
The PES refinery in South Philadelphia receives two to four loads of crude oil every day on trains stretching more than 100 cars long. Last month, a
train bound for the refinery derailed, leaving seven cars intact, but leaning across a bridge spanning the Sch uy 11 kill River and a major highway.
Crude-by-rail is helping to keep Philadelphia in the oil refining business - an industry that was on its way out in 2011 - but Rinaldi admits there is
room for improvement. "We think that we're taking prudent risk and maybe this is a little bit of a learning as we go along, but railroads have been
pulling cargo for just too many years to believe that they can't do that safely," he
says.
Environmental advocates, however, are not satisfied. Iris Marie Bloom with Protecting
Our Waters, a Philadelphia-based group, says the industry agreement to reduce the
speed of trains as they travel through cities does not address one major risk: oid
tanker cars that are prone to puncture during derailments.
"The DOT-111 cars should be taken off the tracks now," Bloom says. "We know too
much about how vulnerable they are."
Federal regulators and the railroads say they are working on that issue separately.
"I'm glad that they're slowing speeds and increasing track inspections," Bloom says.
"But these are policies that should have already been in place."
The industry's voluntary changes are expected to take effect by July of this year.

-------
Page 8
^fryr
Sy

Preparedness Unit Mission Statement:
We will increase EPA Region 8 preparedness through:
•	Planning, Training, Exercising, and developing outreach relations with federal agencies,
states, tribes, local organizations and the regulated community.
•	Assisting in the development of EPA Region 8 preparedness planning and response
capabilities through the RSC. IMT. RRT, OP A, RMP. etc.
•	Working with facilities to reduce accidents and spills through education, inspections and
enforcement. To view our programs, or contact a member of our team:
(Click here for Org Chart)
Acronym List
IMT Incident Management Team
OPA Oil Pollution Act
RRT Regional Response Team
RSC Response Support Corps
SPCC Spill Prevention. Control, and Countermeasures
Em«rgencles
Report oil or
chemical spills at
800-424-8802
More
1 (800) 424-8802
www.nrc.uscg.mii
Need More info on the Risk Management Program (RMP)?
Brent Truskowski, Acting RMP Coordinator: (303) 312-6235
RMP Hotline: (303) 312-6345
RMP Reporting Center: The Reporting Center can answer questions about software or installation
problems. The RMP Reporting Center is available from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Fri-
day, for questions on the Risk Management Plan program: (703) 227-7650 or RMPRC@epacdx.net
Chemical Emergency Preparedness & Prevention Office (CEPPO) http://www.epa.gov/oem
Compliance and Enforcement: http://www2.epa. gov/enforcement
Compliance Assistance: http://www.epa.go\7oecaerth/assistance/index.html
Call our hotline, the Superfund, TRI. EPCRA. RMP. and Oil Information Center (800) 424-9346 or (703) 412-9810 TDD (800)
553-7672 or (703) 412-3323 Mon-Thurs 10:00 am to 3:00 pm ET (except Federal Holidays) or see
www, epa. gov/ siroerfimd/contacts/mfocenter/
You can also call or write to:
U.S. EPA Region 8
1595 Wynkoop Street (8EPR-ER)
Denver, CO 80202-1129
800-227-8917
CO, MT. MX SD. UT, and WY
To report an oil or chemical spill, call the National Response Center at (800) 424-8802.
This newsletter provides information on the EPA Risk Management Program, EPCRA, SPCC/FRP (Facility Response Plan) ana
other issues relating to Accidental Release Prevention Requirements. The information should be used as a reference tool, not as a
definitive source of compliance information. Compliance regulations are published in 40 CFR Part 68 for CAA section 112(r)
Risk Management Program, 40 CFR Part 355/370for EPCRA, and 40 CFR Part 112.2 for SPCC/FRP.

-------
Upcoming National Preparedness for Response
Exercise Program (PREP)
Page 9
C asper, WV • May 14 and 15. 2014
National Preparedness
for Response Exercise
Program (PREP) 2014
The U.S. EPA Region 8 and Spectra Energy- are conducting a full-scale exercise (FSE) and tabletop exercise
( I IX) under the National Preparedness for Response Exercise Program (PREP). The exercises will take place
m Casper, Wyoming on May 14 and 15,2014. The FSE is designed to test the entire community response in
accordance with Spectra Energy's Facility Response Plan (FRP) and the U.S. EPA Region 8 Regional
Contingency Plan (RCP).
Exercise Format
Pari Mar 14. 2014
On Day of PREP 2014, FSE activities will focus on the initial response to a worst-case discharge of crude oil
from the Spectra Energy facility The FSE is designed to evaluate response capabilities and enhance
coordination among response partners during a regional response involving a large-scale oil release. The FSE is
also intended to meet 15 core components of PREP:
1.
Notifications
9.
Disposal
2L
Staff Mobilization
10.
Communications
3.
Response Management System
11.
Transportation
4
Discharge Control
12.
Personnel Support
5.
Assessment of Discharge
13.
Resource Support and Logistics
6.
Containment of Discharge
14.
Procurement
7.
Recovery of Spilled Material
15.
Documentation.
S
Protection of Sensitive Areas


During the FSE, an incident command post (ICP) and unified command (UQ will be established at the Best
Western Ramkota Hotel and Conference Center in Casper, Wyoming A jomt information center (JIC) will also
be established to address public information needs related to the mcident. Field response activities involving oil
containment and recovery operations are currently planned at 3 locations on the North Platte River.
Day 2 - May IS, 2014
On Day 2 of PREP 2014, a TTX will be conducted at the Best Western Ramkota Hotel and Conference Center
m Casper. TTX players will participate in a facilitated discussion concerning response and recovery issues
anticipated during later operational penods of the event (Le., Event + 2 weeks). The TTX will allow
participants to discuss possible solutions to a variety of issues that were not fully exercised during Day 1. A
TTX facilitator will provide background information and pose questions to participants concerning
problems/issues likely to be encountered later in the incident
,.Ji|it,
ifnESSSi-"

-------
Page 10
Oil Regulations Workshop/ Webinar
EPA's Oil Program staff will conduct a free workshop on the oil pollution regulations and the
requirements for preparing and implementing Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC)
Plans and Facility Response Plans (FRP). Plans must be prepared and implemented by facilities which
store, process, transfer, distribute, use, consume, drill, produce, gather, or refine oil or oil products.
The term "oil" is defined as petroleum oils, including gasoline, asphalt, kerosene, motor oil, etc.; animal
and fish oils; vegetable oils; synthetic oils; and any other kind of oil.
The workshop will be held on Tuesday June 3, 2014. The first session will cover SPCC and is scheduled
from 8:30 AM until 12:00 PM. The second session is scheduled from 1:00 PM until 4:30 PM and will
cover FRP. This workshop is free of charge, but you must register to attend. The workshop will
be held at the U.S. EPA Region 8 Office located at 1595 Wynkoop St. Denver, CO 80202. We will also
have the option for participants to attend remotely.
If you would like to register please call 303-312-6801 with your name, the name of your organization,
your organization's address, and your daytime phone number and whether you plan on attending in
person or remotely.
Please contact David Lennon at (303) 312-6801 or lennon.david@epa.aov for information or to register
for the workshop.

-------
Page 11

You're Invited!
What: EPA's Clean Air Act Risk Management Program Training
Webinarfor Program 2 Facilities
When: Wednesday May 28, 2014 9:00 AM (CDT) - 4:00 PM (CDT)
Presented by Eastern Research Group, Inc.
Register using the link below to reserve your spot at the webinar
https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/143703906
Register using the link belo
httDs://www2. eotomeetin
NO COST
v>EPA
You're Invited!
What: EPA's Clean Air Act Risk Management Program Training
Webinarfor Program 3 Facilities
When: Thursday May 15, 2014 8:30 AM (CDT) - 4:30 PM (CDT
Presented by Eastern Research Group, Inc.
NO COST
SEFtt

-------