EPA - 600 / R- 9 8- 013
February 1998
Products of Incomplete Combustion
from Direct Burning
of Pentachlorophenol-Treated Wood Wastes
by:
S.Y. Lee and J.C. Valenti
Acurex Environmental Corporation
4915 Prospectus Avenue
Durham, NC 27713
EPA Contract No. 68-D4-0005
Work Assignment No. 3-22
EPA Project Officer:
Robert V. Hendriks
Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division
National Risk Management Research Laboratory
86 T.W. Alexander Drive
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Prepared for the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Research and Development
Washington, D.C. 20460
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before complei III llll II ||||l III I ||l|| III 11 III
1. REPORT NO. 2.
EPA-600/R-98-013
3. in mi ii inn iiiiiiiii hi11 in
PB98-127731
4. TITLE ANO SUBTITLE
Products of Incomplete Combustion from Direct
Burning of Pentachlorophenol-Treated Wood Wastes
S. REPORT DATE
February 1998
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
S. Y. Lee and J. C. Valenti
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
A cur ex Environmental Corporation
4915 Prospectus Avenue
Durham, North Carolina 27713
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
68-D4-0005, WA 3-22
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
EPA, Office of Research and Development
.Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
13. TYPE OF REPORT ANO PERIOD COVERED
Task Final; 1/96 - 1/97
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
EPA/600/13
15. supplementary notesAppCD project officer is Robert V. Hendriks, Mail Drop 63,
919/541-3928.
i6. abstract rep0rt gives results of a study to identify potential air pollution pro-
blems from the combustion of waste wood treated with pentachlorophenol preserva-
tive for energy production in a boiler. The study emphasized the characterization of
the products of incomplete combustion (PICs) in the combustion flue gas. The meth-
odology used was to compare the flue gas concentrations of PICs prior to the air pol-
lution control device of a pilot-scale combustor burning untreated wood and burning
wood treated with pentachlorophenol preservative. The tests showed that combustion
is an effective method of destroying the pentachlorophenol in the treated wood, with
destruction efficiencies higher than 99. 99%. Differences in the flue gas concentra-
tions of various PICs from the combustion of untreated and treated wood fuels have
been noted. The data do not enable identification of the exact cause of these differ-
ences in flue gas concentrations. These differences are possibly caused by the sig-
nificantly different chlorine content of the two fuels. The difference in flue gas flow
rate required for the combustion of these two fuels with different combustion charac-
teristics (moisture content and heating value) may also cause the differences in PIC
formation rates. These data are strongly influenced by the design, configuration,
and operation of the combustor system.
17. KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
a. DESCRIPTORS
b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
c. COS ATI Field/Group
Pollution
Wood Wastes
Combustion
Phenols
Wood Preservatives
Fuels
Pollution Control
Stationary Sources
Pentachlorophenol
Products of Incomplete
Combustion (PICs)
13 B
llL
2 IB
07C
11G
2 ID
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release to Public
19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport)
Unclassified
21. NO. OF PAGES
162
20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
-------
NOTICE'
This document has been reviewed in accordance with
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency policy and
approved for publication. Mention of trade names
or commercial products does not constitute endorse-
ment or recommendation for use.
Reproduced from
best available copy.
ii
-------
FOREWORD
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is charged by Congress'with pro-
tecting the Nation's land, air, and water resources. Under a mandate of national
environmental laws, the Agency strives to formulate and implement actions lead-
ing to a compatible balance between human activities and the ability of natural
systems to support and nurture life. To meet this mandate, EPA's research
program is providing data and technical support for solving environmental pro-
blems today and building a science knowledge base necessary to manage our eco-
logical resources wisely, understand how pollutants affect our health, and pre-
vent or reduce environmental risks in the future.
The National Risk Management Research Laboratory is the Agency's center for
investigation of technological and management approaches for reducing risks
from threats to human health and the environment. The focus of the Laboratory's
research program is on methods for the prevention and control of pollution to air,
land, water, and subsurface resources; protection of water quality in public water
systems; remediation of contaminated sites and groundwater; and prevention and
control of indoor air pollution. The goal of this research effort is to catalyze
development and implementation of innovative, cost-effective environmental
technologies; develop scientific and engineering information needed by EPA to
support regulatory and policy decisions; and provide technical support and infor-
mation transfer to ensure effective implementation of environmental regulations
and strategies.
This publication has been produced as part of the Laboratory's strategic long-
term research plan. It is published and made available by EPA's Office of Re-
search and Development to assist the user community and to link researchers
with their clients.
E. Timothy Oppelt, Director
National Risk Management Research Laboratory
iii
-------
ABSTRACT
This study was conducted to identify potential air pollution problems from the
combustion of waste wood treated with pentachlorophenol preservative for energy production in
a boiler. The emphasis of the study was placed on the characterization of the products of
incomplete combustion (PICs) in the combustion flue gas. The methodology used was to
compare the flue gas concentrations of PICs prior to the air pollution control device of a pilot-
scale combustor burning untreated wood and burning wood treated with pentachlorophenol
preservative. The tests showed that combustion is an effective method of destroying the
pentachlorophenol contained in the pentachlorophenol-treated wood, with destruction
efficiencies higher than 99.99 %. Differences in the flue gas concentrations of various PICs from
the combustion of untreated and treated wood fuels have been noted. The data do not enable
identification of the exact cause of these differences in flue gas concentrations. These
differences are possibly caused by the significantly different chlorine content of the two fuels.
The difference in flue gas flow rate required for the combustion of these two fuels with different
combustion characteristics (moisture content and heating value) may also cause the differences in
PIC formation rates. These data are strongly influenced by the design, configuration, and
operation of the combustor system and may not be quantitatively comparable to other
combustors.
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Abstract iv
List of Tables V11
List of Figures ix
Acknowledgment x
Conversion Table x
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 EXPERIMENTAL 2
2.1 Test Facility 2
2.2 Operation of the MFC 8
2.3 Waste Wood Fuel 9
2.4 Combustion Parameters 10
2.5 Manual Sampling and Analytical Procedures 11
3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 17
3.1 Test Conditions 17
3.2 Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Concentrations 24
3.3 Semi-Volatile Organic Compound (SVOC) Concentrations . 25
3.4 Pentachlorophenol (PCP) Destruction Efficiency 26
3.5 Dioxin/Furan (PCDD/PCDF) Concentrations 26
3.6 Polychlorobiphenol (PCB) Concentrations 31
3.7 Aldehyde and Methane Concentrations 32
3.8 Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure (TCLP)
Analysis of Flyash 32
4.0 CONCLUSIONS 33
5.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL 34
5.1 Data Quality Indicators 35
5.2 Summary of Quality Assurance and Quality Control Results . 37
5.3 Internal Audits 43
V
-------
6.0 REFERENCES 48
APPENDIX I: CEMDATA 1-1
APPENDIX D: VOC SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS II-1
APPENDIX HI: SVOC SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS IE-1
APPENDIX IV: PCDD/PCDF ANALYSIS RESULTS IV-1
APPENDIX V: PCB ANALYSIS RESULTS V-l
vi
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table Number Page
2-1 Continuous Emission Monitors 7
2-2 Fuel Analysis 10
2-3 Volatile Organic Compound Target Analytes 12
2-4 Semi volatile Organic Compound Target Analytes 15
3-1 Combustor Operating Conditions 17
3-2 Summary of Flue Gas Temperature and CEM Data 18
3-3 Flue Gas VOC Concentrations 24
3-4 Flue Gas SVOC Concentrations 25
3-5 Destruction Efficiency for Pentachlorophenol 26
3-6 Total PCDD/PCDF Concentrations 27
3-7 Distribution of PCDD/PCDF in Sampling Train 30
3-8 PCB Test Results 31
3-9 Aldehyde Test Results 32
3-10 TCLP Analysis Results 33
5-1 Summary of Data Quality Achieved for Continuous Emission Monitors 39
5-2 Summary of Data Quality Achieved for Flow Measurement Devices 40
5-3 Data Quality Achieved for the PCDD/PCDF Analyses 42
5-4 Data Quality Achieved for SVOC Analyses 44
vii
-------
5-5 Data Quality Achieved for PCB Analyses 45
5-6 Performance Evaluation Audit 47
viii
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Number Page
1-1 Schematic of Multifuel Combustor 3
3-1 Temperature Profile for Untreated Wood Tests 19
3-2 Temperature Profile for Treated Wood Tests 20
3-3 Temperature Vs. Flue Gas Residence Time for Untreated Wood Tests 21
3-4 Temperature Vs. Flue Gas Residence Time for Treated Wood Tests 22
3-5 PCDD Congeners (Untreated Wood Tests) 28
3-6 PCDD Congeners (Treated Wood Tests) 28
3-7 PCDF Congeners (Untreated Wood Tests) 29
3-8 PCDF Congeners (Treated Wood Tests) 29
ix
-------
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The support of C.W. Lee, Jeffrey Ryan, and James Kilgroe of EPA, NRMRL-RTP and
the Acurex sampling and analytical laboratory crews in the planning and support of this project
are gratefully acknowledged.
CONVERSION TABLE
Certain non-metric units are used in this report for the reader's convenience. Readers
more familiar with metric units may use the following factors to convert to that system.
Nonmetric Multiplied by Yields Metric
°F 5/9(°F-32) °C
psi 6.89 kPa
Btu/lb 2.326 J/g
CFM 2.832 x 10"2 m3/min
in. 2.54 x 10"2 m
in. ofH20 248.84 Pa
X
-------
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The use of waste wood for producing energy is a promising supplement to burning fossil
fuels for many regions of the country. Besides recovering energy and conserving landfill space,
burning waste wood fuels also mitigates global warming by replacing fossil fuel combustion. If
left to decay in the landfill, the waste wood will eventually release the global warming gases to
atmosphere. By producing energy from burning the waste wood, fossil fuel will be conserved,
thus reducing the release of the global warming gases. However, the environmental consequence
resulting from emissions generated by combustion of waste wood that contains paints resins, or
preservatives are not well understood. There are some indications that the combustion of waste
wood treated with chemicals may produce potentially hazardous products of incomplete
combustion (PIC) emissions such as dioxins and furans.1'2 The possibility of these types of
emissions has caused regulator and the public concern as to the risk that treated wood
combustion poses to human health and the environment. With an understanding of pollutant
formation processes under controlled pilot-scale conditions, better informed evaluations can be
made for the full-scale combustion of treated waste wood.
A 1992 study3 sponsored by the New York State Energy Research and Development
Authority and others identified potential air and ash emissions of criteria and hazardous air
pollutants (HAPs) based on existing test burn data, wood and ash composition data, and air
impact analysis. While the report provided valuable data, a full characterization of the
environmental and regulatory implications of burning treated wood could not be made because
the test burn data were obtained using different test methods for a wide variety of boiler types,
operating conditions, fuel sources and mixes, and air pollution control equipment. In addition,
the emissions were not related to the composition of the wood fuel actually burned. For
example, the wood used in the laboratory analyses to determine the chemical composition of
waste wood and wood ash were not burned in a large-scale combustion device so that air and ash
emissions could be measured.
The present project was designed to address some of the data limitations encountered in
the NYERDA study. The main objective of the project was to characterize emissions (mainly
1
-------
PICs) resulting from controlled test burns of untreated and pentachlorophenol treated wood.
Utility poles and crossbars are typically treated with a preservative such as pentachlorophenol to
prolong their service life. After being taken out of service, the treated woods are normally
disposed of by land filling. Burning such wood waste in boilers for steam generation becomes an
increasingly attractive management alternative as it contains substantial energy values and
reduces land filling costs.
Pilot scale combustion tests were conducted under well controlled conditions using a
pilot-scale combustion system, small enough to allow control over the key parameters that affect
emissions, yet large enough to effectively simulate full-scale combustion systems. The pilot-
scale approach for studying waste wood combustion offers the most efficient and cost-effective
means of identifying and controlling variables that govern pollutant formation and destruction
during combustion. Pilot facilities can mimic pollutant formation and destruction processes
involved in waste wood combustion at a practical scale without the extensive time and cost
required for operating a full-scale facility. With this approach, the important variables that
control the formation and destruction of pollutants during combustion can be isolated and their
effects determined. Measurements were made in the flue gas upstream of existing air pollution
control equipment to characterize the formation of trace organic pollutants. Prior to burning each
load of treated wood, a sample of that load was obtained and analyzed to determine the chemical
composition of the wood. During combustion testing, sampling and analysis for a wide variety
of PICs, including volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semivolatile organic compounds
(SVOCs), and dioxins and furans, were performed.
2.0 EXPERIMENTAL
2.1 Test Facility
The combustion testing was conducted using the multi-fuel combustor (MFC) located at
EPA's National Risk Management Research Laboratory's research facility in Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina. The MFC, shown in Figure 1, is a pilot-scale stoker combustor with 0.58
MW (2 million Btu/hr) maximum thermal output. The MFC can simulate the full range of
conditions that might be encountered in commercial stoker-fired combustion facilities. The MFC
2
-------
U)
Stack
Radiant Furnace
Cooling Water
Conveetive Section
Fuel
Daghouse
Sampling
Port
Ash
Ail-
Ash -—
Ash Scrubber
FIGURE 1-1 SCHEMATIC OF MULTIFUEL COMBUSTOR
-------
is capable of burning a wide variety of solid fuels, including municipal solid waste (MSW),
refuse derived fuel (RDF), biomass fuel, and coal, singly or in combination. The MFC stoker
grate system was designed for operation under mass burn or spreader stoker (semi-suspension)
firing conditions. Bottom ash is manually removed from the combustor on a periodic basis by
cleaning of the fuel bed. The processes controlling pollutant formation and destruction can be
studied during combustion on the fuel bed, in the radiant furnace or the convective section, as
well as downstream of air pollution control devices, such as a baghouse and scrubber. The
combustor is constructed with modular sections to provide maximum flexibility for modifying
the combustor for research purposes. Access ports are installed throughout the combustor for
sampling and visual observation. All process temperatures, pressures, feed, and flow rates of the
MFC are monitored by sensors installed at various locations in the combustor. The MFC is
equipped with a natural gas burner for preheating and start-up operations. The MFC facility
consists of the following major component sections:
• Combustor
The combustor, sometimes called a spreader stoker, was designed and fabricated by
Reaction Engineering International, Salt Lake City, Utah. It is designed to burn coal, RDF, and
biomass as the main fuel. Gas burners are installed to maintain system temperature when the
solid fuel is not burned. Preheated combustion air is provided under and over the grate.
• Fuel Feeding System
The fuel feeding system consists of a storage hopper, a feed conveyor, an activated feed
bin, and a vibrating feeder. Fuel is moved from the storage hopper to an activated feed bin by
means of a flight conveyor. The activated feed bin in concert with a vibrating feeder supplies
fuel to the stoker combustor. The solid conveyer is a Model CWR2430-12 Camwall conveyor
with a rated speed of 100 fpm. The activated bin and the vibrating feeder are both manufactured
by Kinergy Corporation. The mass flow of the vibratory feeder is calibrated for control of the
fuel feed rate. The feeder assembly is housed inside a gas-sealed cover, connecting the silo to the
spreader stoker. In addition, the cover is used to prevent air leakage into the combustor since the
combustor is operated at negative pressure to prevent flame leakage outside the combustor. The
fuel travels horizontally along the vibrational feeder and drops vertically through a transition
4
-------
section into the lower feed injection port of the spreader stoker.
• Freeboard Section
The refractory-lined freeboard section provides ample residence time to complete
combustion and provides a time temperature profile comparable to full scale units. The furnace
is approximately 38-ft in length and contains two vertical and two horizontal sections to conserve
floor space within the room. Thermocouples have been installed to provide temperature of the
gas stream. View and sample ports have been installed at strategic locations in the freeboard.
• Convective Section
After leaving the freeboard section, the flue gases enter the convective section where they
are cooled. A high pressure water system with six cooling coils is used to remove heat from the
flue gas. The high pressure water system is designed to maximize cooling conditions associated
with cooling the flue gas at water flow rates from temperatures up to 2700 °F down to 300 °F.
The high pressure water system can operate at pressures up to 500 psi to prevent boiling of the
coolant. The cooling coils are connected to the high pressure manifold using flexible stainless
steel hoses rated to 727 psi and control valves. The valves can be used to control the flow of the
cooling water to each coil to customize the time-temperature profile in the convective section.
• Pulse-jet Baghouse
After exiting the convective section, the fuel gases pass through stainless steel ducting
and enter the pulse-jet baghouse where particulate is removed. The baghouse (Model SQ L72
B36) was manufactured by M & W Industries, Inc., Rural Hall, NC. There is 358 ft2 of cloth area
from 36 fiberglass bags with Gore-Tex membranes. The air to cloth ratio is 3.21:1. The pressure
drop across the baghouse triggers the solid state timer to begin the pulsing for cleaning of the
bags. A supply of 90-100 psi dry air is required for proper operation of the pulsing jets.
• Packed Bed Scrubber
After exiting the baghouse, the flue gases enter a packed bed scrubber (Model FRP
Phaser V-l) manufactured by KCH Services, Inc., Forest City, NC. The scrubber is a
countercurrent design for flows up to 1000 CFM with gases entering the bottom of the scrubber
and exiting out the top into the induced draft fan. The scrubber solution is sprayed onto the
packing media (2.3-in LANPAC) at the top of the packed bed. After leaving the bed, the gases
5
-------
pass through a section of mist eliminators to remove the excess moisture from the flow. The
acidic effluent resulting from contact with the gases containing HC1 and sulfur oxides is
neutralized by the addition of sodium hydroxide using a pH controller coupled to a variable
speed gear pump. Recirculation of the scrubbing liquid is achieved through a 1.5-hp centrifugal
pump mounted at the sump of the scrubber. From the recirculation pump, the scrubber solution
enters a heat exchanger to reduce its temperature before being recirculated into the spray header.
Makeup water, to compensate for evaporation, is taken from the city water system and is
controlled by a float switch mounted in the sump. In the event of a power or recirculation pump
failure, city water is diverted directly into the spray nozzles to ensure adequate cooling. A
discharge pump operating from an independent float switch is used to remove any excess water
that may accumulate in the sump during this mode. The discharge pump is also used for periodic
blowdowns of the sump. The system will not operate if city water is not available or if the
pressure falls below safe limits.
• Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEM) System
The MFC is equipped with conventional continuous emission monitors (CEMs) as well
as a state-of-the-art infrared multi-component analyzer to measure continuous air emissions.
The CEMs used for the program are listed in Table 2.1.
6
-------
TABLE 2.1 CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORS
Measurement
EPA Method
Instrument
NOx
Method 7E
Thermo Electron, Model 10, Range 0-10,000ppm
Thermo Electron, Model 900, 9:1 dilution
C02
Method 3A
Horiba, Model VIA-510, Ranges: 0-5, 0-10, 0-
20, and 0-100 percent
CO
Method 10
Horiba, Model VIA-510, Ranges: 0-500, 0-1000,
0-2000, 0-10,000 ppm
02
Method 3A
Rosemont Analytical, Model 755R, Ranges 0-5,
0-10, 0-25, and 0-50 percent
THC
Method 25
J U M Engineering, Model VE 7
HC1
None
Perkin Elmer, MCS 100 Multi Component
Analyzer, Ranges 0-10, 0-100, 0-1000, and 0-
10,000 ppm
• Air Flow Measurement System
The flow rates of air and flue gas in the MFC were measured by orifice plates and venturi
flow tubes (Flow-Lin Corporation/ Arlington, TX). Continuous flow measurements were made
of total air supply, gas burner air, fresh overfire air, fresh underfire air, recirculation air, sweep
air, overfire recirculation air, and underfire recirculation gas.
• Temperature Measurement
Temperature sensing throughout the system was achieved by ungrounded K-type
thermocouples. The thermocouples are either wired directly to pyrometers or go to selector
switches (OMEGA Engineering/ Stamford, CT) connected to pyrometers.
• Flue gas temperatures
Temperatures of the flue gases are measured using thermocouples inserted directly
into the flow. Due to the corrosive environment and elevated temperatures, these
7
-------
thermocouples have Inconel 600 sheaths whereas all other thermocouples in the facility
have 316 stainless steel sheaths. The thermocouples have been located at strategic
locations within the system.
• Combustion air temperatures
Fresh combustion air for the stoker was supplied from the outside or from the
conditioned area inside the room (or any combination). The temperature of this
combustion air is measured and then proportioned into four separate areas of the stoker as
required: overfire, underfire, gas burner, and sweep. The gas burner air is used to
provide combustion air directly to the area around the natural gas burner. The sweep air
is used to spread the solid fuel across the stoker grate and contributes to the air available
for combustion.
• Pressure Measurement
Pressure transmitters were used to monitor pressures in the system and pressure drops
across components. These devices send 4-20 mA signals proportionate to the pressure back to
the indicating device mounted in the control panel.
Pressure indicators are used to measure system static pressures, the proportion of overfire
and underfire recirculation air, and to trigger an alarm to the programmable controller if the
pressure below the grate exceeds a prescribed value. This safety is used to determine if the grate
has become clogged with excessive solid fuel or ash.
2.2 Operation of the MFC
The combustor was operated in a spreader stoker firing mode for the present study.
Wood fuel was stored in a large roll-off container located near the building which houses the
MFC. A tote bin filled with the wood fuel was transported to the MFC facility and the fuel was
dumped into a loading hopper installed outside the facility building with a lift truck. A conveyor
moved the fuel to an active vibrating storage silo installed inside the building. The vibrating silo
is designed to ensure homogeneous mixing and reduce wall sticking. The fuel was distributed
from the silo onto an airtight horizontal vibrating feeder conveyor connecting the silo to the
8
-------
transition section of the spreader stoker. The mass flow of the conveyor was calibrated for
control of the fuel feed rate. The fuel traveled horizontally along the conveyor and dropped
through the transition section into the feed injection port of the spreader stoker. The vibrating
transition section is designed with an inlet air plenum area and adjustable inlet angle plate to
facilitate spreading fuel onto the stoker grate where a burning fuel bed is formed.
2.3 Waste Wood Fuel
Two different waste wood fuels, an untreated wood and a pentachlorophenol treated
wood, were obtained from an industrial plant where wood utility poles are treated with
pentachlorophenol. The untreated wood was green pine poles that are typically treated in the
plant. The treated wood was a mixture of recently treated poles, mostly small pieces cut from the
ends to meet customers' length specifications, and aged treated poles taken out of service. Both
treated and untreated poles were ground into chips with less than 7.6 cm (3 in.) in size with a
shredder. The two fuels were characterized by proximate, ultimate and chlorine analysis with the
result showing in Table 2-2.
9
-------
TABLE 2-2 FUEL ANALYSIS2
Component
(as-received basis)
Untreated
Wood
Treated
Wood
Moisture, %
33.44
21.46
Ash, %
0.25
0.57
Volatiles, %
57.92
66.28
Carbon, %
33.83
43.24
Fixed Carbon, %
8.39
11.69
Hydrogen, %
4.20
4.92
Nitrogen, %
0.28
0.28
Sulfur, %
0.01
0.05
Oxygen, %
27.99
29.48
Heating Value, Btu/lb
5569
7237
pentachlorophenol, mg/kg
6.7
4100
2,4 -dimethylphenol, mg/kg
2.4
3.6
Chlorine, %
0.02
0.20
a - Analysis performed by Commercial Testing & Engineering Co.
It can be seen that the treated wood fuel is drier with higher heating value as compared with those
of the untreated wood. The chlorine content of the treated wood fuel is ten times higher than that
for the untreated wood.
2.4 Combustion Parameters
The only parameter investigated in the present study was to determine the difference in
the flue gas concentrations of pollutants when burning treated vs. untreated wood under similar
"good combustion conditions." No attempt was made to evaluate the effects of combustion
conditions on the formation of PICs. In general, the operating conditions of the test were
10
-------
considered optimal when the fuel was burning at the designed heat release rate with
approximately 160 percent excess air and a low level (<100 ppm) of carbon monoxide emission
in the flue gas.
The amount of fuel burned was not measured continuously during a test. It was estimated
by weighing the fuel before it was dumped into a loading hopper of the MFC and measuring the
duration for its complete consumption to calculate an average feed rate. The average feed rate
was used to estimate the amount of fuel burned during the known emissions sampling period.
One-minute average readings of all the CEM measurements were recorded throughout the test by
a data acquisition system. Flow rates of underfire air, overfire air, and sweep air as well as
temperature measurements at various locations were continuously measured and recorded.
2.5 Manual Sampling and Analytical Procedures
The MFC is equipped with several sampling ports for collecting flue gas samples. The
emission sampling port used for this study is located in the duct that connects the convective
section of the furnace to the baghouse. The selection of a sampling location prior to any gas
cleaning device was made to ensure that any difference in pollutants generated by combustion of
treated and untreated wood fuels be observed. Measurements made after the flue gas cleaning
device would mask this difference and would be reflective of the effectiveness of the baghouse
and scrubber used. At the selected sampling location, the horizontally oriented duct (8-in SS pipe
- nominal inside diameter 8.25-in) is sufficient in length and free of flow disturbances as required
by the sampling method. The particulate matter (PM) could be sampled in only one axial
direction meeting Method 1A PM sampling requirements4. A separate port was not available for
simultaneous velocity measurements; as a result, radial sampling locations were determined by a
separate velocity traverse performed before and after sampling at each axial sampling location.
During sampling, the duct was traversed based on the initial velocity traverse. A Volatile
Organic Sampling Train (VOST), Modified Method 5 sampling train (MM 5), and a Method 23
sampling train were attached to the ports for simultaneous measurements for each run.
11
-------
• Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Sampling and Analysis
VOCs were collected using the Volatile Organic Sampling Train (VOST) as described in
SW-846 Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste Method 0030, "Volatile Organic Sampling
Train."5 Two sets of samples were collected for each test and at least six sets of samples were
collected for each type of waste wood. A total volume of ~ 20 liters were collected for each
sample. Sampling was performed at 0.5 liter/min for 40 min.
VOST samples were analyzed by purge and trap GC/MS as described in RCRA Methods
5040/8240.6'7 Practical quantitation limits (PQLs), based on the lowest calibration concentration,
were used to estimate upper limit concentrations of those compounds not detected. Compounds
detected below the PQL were flagged and reported as estimated concentrations. The target
analytes examined are listed in Table 2-3.
TABLE 2-3 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND TARGET ANALYTES
Compound
Typical Detection Limits in an Air
Matrix (micrograms per VOST)
Acetone
0.013
Benzene
0.002
Bromodichloromethane
0.002
Bromomethane
0.002
Bromoform
0.008
2-Butanone
0.008
Carbon disulfide
0.004
Carbon tetrachloride
0.002
Chlorobenzene
0.001
Chlorodibromomethane
0.004
Chloroethane
0.002
Chloroform
0.002
Chloromethane
0.009
(Continued)
12
-------
Table 2-3 (Cont.)
Compound
Typical Detection Limits in an Air
Matrix (micrograms per VOST)
1,1 -Dichloroethane
0.003
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.004
1,1 -Dichloroethene
0.003
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
0.002
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
0.003
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.002
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
0.002
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
0.004
Ethyl benzene
0.004
2-Hexanone
0.014
Methylene chloride
0.002
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
0.006
Styrene
0.006
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
0.011
Tetrachloroethene
0.004
Toluene
0.002
1,1,1 -T richloroethane
0.001
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
0.003
Trichloroethene
0.001
T richlorofluoromethane
0.001
Vinyl acetate
0.009
Vinyl chloride
0.001
o-Xylene
0.006
m/p-Xylene
0.010
13
-------
• Semivolatile Organics Compound (SVOC) Sampling and Analysis
SVOCs were collected using the Modified MM5 train as described in SW-846 Test
Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste Method 0010, "Modified Method 5 Sampling Train".8 A
total of at least 3 MM5 samples were collected for each wood type.
The MM5 samples were analyzed for SVOCs by GC/MS as described in RCRA Method
8270B9. The SVOC target analyte list is presented in Table 2-4. The target list reflects the
majority of the target analytes presented in Method 8270 along with additional analytes of
interest.
14
-------
TABLE 2-4. SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND TARGET ANALYTES
n-methyl-n-nitroso ethanamine
Dimethylphalate
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
2,6-dinitrotoluene
Aniline
Acenaphthene (CCC)
Phenol (CCC)
4-nitroaniline
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-dinitrophenol (SPCC)
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
Dibenzofuran
1,4-Dichlorobenzene (CCC)
Pentachlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
2,4-dinitrotoluene
Benzyl Alcohol
2,3,4,6-tetrachlorophenol
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
4-nitrophenol (SPCC)
2-Methylphenol
Fluorene
Acetophenone
Diethyl phathalate
Hexachloroethane
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
4-methylphenol
2-methyl-5-nitrobenzenamine
N-nitrododipropylamine (SPCC)
2-methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
Nitrobenzene
Diphenylamine
1 -Nitrosopiperidine
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
Isophorone
Phenacetin
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Hexachlorobenzene
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Pentachlorophenol (CCC)
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Phenanthrene
2,4-Dichlorophenol (CCC)
Anthracene
1,2,4-T richlorobenzene
Dibutyl phthalate
Naphthalene
Fluoranthene (CCC)
2-Nitrophenol (CCC)
Pyrene
2,6-Dichlorophenol
P-dimethylaminoazobenzene
Hexachloropropene
Bensyl butyl phthalate
4-Chloroaniline
3,3 '-Dichlorobenzidine
Hexachlorobutadiene (CCC)
Benzo (a) anthracene
N-butyl-N-nitroso-butanamine
Chrysene
4-chloro-3-methyl-phenol (CCC)
Di-N-octyl phthalate (CCC)
2-methylnaphthalene
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
1,2,4,5-tetrachlorobenzene
7,12-Dimethylbenz (a) anthracene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (SPCC)
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
2,4,6-trichlorophenol (CCC)
Benzo (a) pyrene (CCC)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
3 -methylcholanthrene
2-chloronaphthalene
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene
2-nitroanilinne
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene
3-nitroaniline
Benzo (ghi) perylene
Acenaphthylene
15
-------
• PCDD/PCDF and PCB Sampling and Analysis
PCDD/PCDF samples were collected as described in 40 CFR Part 60 Appendix A
Method 23, "Determination of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Polychlorinated
Dibenzofurans from Stationary Sources".10 This method is virtually identical to MM5 with
minor changes. A total of six PCDD/PCDF samples were collected for the two types of waste
wood tests. The Method 23 samples were analyzed for PCDD/PCDF by high resolution GC/MS
in the selected ion monitoring mode (HRGC/HRMS-SIM).
In addition to the regular PCDD/PCDF analysis, a PCB analysis was conducted on the
same extracts. An aliquot of the front and back half extract archive potions of each of the
Method 23 trains was combined and analyzed by HRGC/HRMS-SIM for PCBs.
• Aldehyde and Methane Sampling and Analysis
The flue gas was sampled for general levels of aldehydes with an adsorbent tube
technique, Modified Method 1P-6A for indoor air." Between 10 and 15 liters of flue gas was
pulled through a Waters DNPH on Silica Gel cartridge at a sampling rate of one liter per minute.
The cartridges were analyzed by the Method 1P6A. A methane grab sample was pulled from the
flue on the first two test days of untreated and treated wood tests using SW 846 Method 0040.12
The one liter grab samples were analyzed for methane concentration with US EPA Method 18.13
• Ash Sampling
After each run, one batch of fly ash accumulated in the baghouse during the testing was
collected. Fly ash batches were reduced to testing sizes according to the American Society of
Testing Materials (ASTM) Standards for reducing field samples.14 All fly ash samples from the
untreated wood test were combined and the mixed samples were analyzed. The same procedure
was repeated for the treated wood test. Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) tests
for metals were made for these ash samples using TCLP Method 1311.15
16
-------
3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1 Test Conditions
A total of six combustion tests, with three tests each for both the untreated and the treated
wood fuels, were made under similar combustor operating conditions. The untreated wood tests
were performed first followed by the treated wood tests in order to avoid any cross contamination
with PCP. Triplicate runs were made to even out any possible variability of fuel characteristics,
fuel feed rate, and nonuniform burning of wood chips on the grate surfaces. Since the fuel
throughput rate cannot be measured in real time bases, combustor operating variables other than
the fuel flow rate were used as the control parameter. The tests were performed under constant
excess air level (nominally 160% excess air) and constant combustion gas temperature (850°C)
measured by a thermocouple located 60 inches (152 cm) above the grate. The heat release rate
for each test, as shown in Table 3-1, were estimated based on the average fuel feed rate
TABLE 3-1 COMBUSTOR OPERATING CONDITIONS
Test
Average Fuel Feed Rate
kg/hr (lb/hr)
Combustor Thermal Output
MW (Million Btu/hr)
Flue Gas Flow
dscm
Untreated 1
134.4(296.4)
0.48(1.65)
19.4
Untreated 2
117.1(258.1)
0.42(1.44)
16.6
Untreated 3
114.1(251.6)
0.41(1.40)
17.9
Treated 1
100.6(221.8)
0.47(1.61)
25.0
Treated 2
102.3(225.6)
0.48(1.63)
21.0
Treated 3
102.5(225.9)
0.48(1.63)
25.8
calculated by the total amount of fuel consumed during the test period and the heating value of
the fuel measured experimentally. As can be seen from Table 3-1, the calculated heat release
rates and the measured flue gas flow rates for Untreated Tests 2 and 3 are lower than those of the
other tests. The lower flue gas flows for Untreated Tests 2 and 3 are consistent with their low
fuel feed rates. The heat release rate was approximately 1.6 million Btu/hr, which is 80% of the
stoker grate's maximum designed output of the MFC. The fuel feed rate was adjusted manually
17
-------
throughout all tests in order to maintain a constant temperature of 850°C above the stoker grate
and keep CO emission below 100 ppm, which were considered to be an acceptable combustion
conditions. The average CEM-measured flue gas concentrations and gas temperatures are
summarized in Table 3-2. CEM data over the test period for CO, C02, NOx, HC1, S02, THC,
TABLE 3-2 SUMMARY OF FLUE GAS TEMPERATURE AND CEM DATA
Location
Temperature, °C
Untreated
Test 1
Untreated
Test 2
Untreated
Test 3
Treated
Test 1
Treated
Test 2
Treated
Test 3
Stoker Exit
849
801
827
869
921
870
Sampling Port
152
153
153
155
160
160
Constituent
Concentration, %
02
12.5
13.2
12.9
13.1
13.3
13.3
co2
7.5
7.2
7.1
6.7
6.5
6.5
h2o
11.0
9.8
9.8
8.7
8.7
9.0
coa
203
249
456
66
21
20
NOa
103
133
83
295
178
210
THCa
77
56
2
4
3
3
HCla
<1
<1
<1
195
194
183
S02
10
11
13
<1
<1
<1
a in ppm @7% oxygen
and H20 for all six test are shown in Appendix I. In addition, temperature profile and gas
residence times are displayed in Figures 3-1 to 3-2 and Figures 3-3 to 3-4, respectively.
Although the temperature-distance profile for treated and untreated tests were quite similar, the
residence times for the treated tests in the higher temperature zone (zone up to the high
temperature heat exchanger) were considerably shorter than that of the untreated wood tests.
This is probably due to the differences in heating value of treated and untreated fuel as well as
the fact that the fuel feed rate was controlled manually by the temperature reading of a
18
-------
UNTKtATTD WA4T5WOOO *1
<0*
3 lot a »0 40 i« 3M m M 9H «
C04I (IU« OOTAMCI (HI
UNTREATSD WASTHWOOO *3
'09
9 I — I I .—II ¦¦ . . I. i >!¦'
0 :OJ SS MO <00 900 ft) 900 30Q nJOS itQO
sa4re*±*m bctimcs »»»
FIGURE 3-1 TcWPSPATURE PRCRLS rCR UNTRS-VTEQ WCOO TESTS.
(Tamparatur® of gas along cantanine as measured from grata)
19
-------
TREATED VVASTEWQQQ 31
TOO
O
u<
5 500
U1
J
Hi
300
100
a
too
so
soa
7TX3
comutl OWTAMCf (kli
TREATED WASTSWOOO *2
tooo
900
700
ui
as
300
200
100
500
600
1000
0
ICO
2CO
300
*ca
soa
900
CSHTZSLftff OISTANCS fin)
CSNTSXUHC DISTANCE (Inl
FIGURE 3*2 TEMPERATURE PROFILE FOR TREATED WCOO TESTS.
(Tamperatura cf gas along cantariine as measured from grate)
20
-------
UNTREATED WASTEWOCO *1
•3QO
90
100
0 12* * 5 0 74 3 10 it 12
TTMg (iW8ftd>|
UNTREATED WASTEWCQO #2
900
aco
700
500
5
7
10
12
3
3
3
1
2
9
tt
HM6 fs*««ndal
UNTREATED WASTEWCQO «
900
300
[900
12
3
2
3
3
7
9
11
0
a
i
4
TMS (s«eo«t0st
FIGURE 3-3 TEMPERATURE VS. FLUE GAS RESIDENCE TIME FOR UNTREATED WCCO TESTS
21
-------
TREATED WASTEWQQQ *1
i 500
*
3 500 •
<
w
2
100
a
2
3
t
S
4
7
a
8
n
u
TMC (ueonasr
TREATED WASTEWCOO #2
300
v
500
¦ ¦¦¦
u ™
s 500
\
< 300
V
<
\
t 400
\
2
*
£ :»
so
^^
fOO-
a
1 z 3 4 5 9 7 i 9 :Q 11 !2
TWfi (••eonds)
TREATED WASTEWOOQ *3
700 i
§ 500
3
5
9
7
9
10
t:
s
ti
3
1
7XK (»««9n4s)
FIGURE 3-1 TEMPERATURE VS. FLUE GAS RE3IOENCE TIME FOR TREATED WCOO TESTS.
22
-------
thermocouple closest to the combustion zone. The differences in residence time may have
significant effect on PIC level and possibly PCDD/PCDF emission level at the sampling point.
A number of factors might have introduced some uncertainty in measurements of the
combustor thermal output and flue gas flow rate based on the total amount of fuel used and flue
gas flow rates measured at beginning and end of the test, respectively. Since only one
thermocouple was used at each downstream location of the combustor, the combustion gas
temperature measured may not truly represent the average temperature of the gas stream at that
location. The gas flow in the combustor appeared to be quite turbulent, and cold air introduced
through the overfire nozzle into the combustor would require time to mix with hot combustion
gas from the stoker grate. In addition, the wood fuel, both untreated and treated, may have been
quite inhomogeneous. However, since the combustor heat release rate of the all the results were
well below the design value of 2 million Btu/hr, quality of combustion and consequently the
emission from the combustor would have been valid and acceptable.
It was difficult to produce exactly identical combustion conditions for all the tests, mainly
due to the inhomogeneity of the two wood fuels used. The treated wood fuel contained aged
wood, which is drier, has 30% higher heating value than those of the untreated wood fuel. In
addition, uneven fuel feed rates resulting from the frequent adjustment of the fuel feeder in order
to maintain a reasonably constant combustion condition as indicated by the temperature and the
CO level caused fluctuations in air to fuel ratio. Fluctuations in the fuel feed may be the cause
of CO and THC excursions observed during the tests. The nonhomogeneous nature of the fuels
coupled with the practical difficulties in burning such fuels under well defined conditions made
the accurate estimation of heat release rates during tests difficult. The high average CO
concentrations for the untreated fuel tests, as shown in Table 3-2, are the result of a large number
of CO excursions. The steady-state CO concentrations during normal operation were well below
100 ppm, but the high CO spikes during excursions resulted in significantly higher average
concentrations. The high incidence of excursions were probably due to the fact that combustion
conditions were difficult to control when burning the untreated wood, which has low heating
value and high moisture content. However, C02 and H20 concentrations, which are the measure
of air to fuel ratio stayed constant for all six tests indicating similar steady-state combustion
23
-------
conditions for all the test runs. The repeatability of the tests are considered to be reasonable for
this size of plant considering the inhomogeneous nature of the fuels coupled with the lack of
means of accurately measuring and controlling the fuel flow rate
3.2 Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Concentrations
A total of 50 volatile organic compounds were analyzed for in the VOC samples obtained
for the tests. The results of the analyses are reported Appendix n. Of the 50 compounds
analyzed, only eight (8) compounds were found to be present above the analytical detection limit
in at least one test and significantly above the level detected in the field and laboratory blanks.
The emission rate of the eight compounds in |4g/dscm at 7% 02 for the six test runs are tabulated
in Table 3-3.
TABLE 3-3 FLUE GAS VOC CONCENTRATIONS
VOCs
Flue Gas Concentrations, yag/dscm @ 7% 02
Untreated
Test 1
Untreated
Test 2
Untreated
Test 3
Treated
Test 1
Treated
Test 2
Treated
Test 3
Chloromethane
53.3
28.5
16.9
55.8
96.7
51.5
1,3-Butadiene
0.6
0.2
1.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
Bromomethane
1.7
1.4
2.1
15.4
33.9
70.5
Iodomethane
0.8
2.4
5.7
1.7
5.1
24.1
Acetone
11.6
7.2
7.5
4.5
11.7
14.3
Chloroform
0.9
0.3
0.3
2.6
1.8
3.9
1,2-Dichloroethane
1.3
5.2
0.1
1.6
0.7
2.9
Benzene
25.4
16.2
27.9
2.1
2.6
3.0
Significant levels of benzene were found only in the untreated wood test samples, while
chloroform was found only in the treated wood test samples. Chloromethane, bromomethane,
iodomethane, acetone, and 1,2-dichloroethane were found in both untreated and treated wood test
24
-------
samples. The trace levels of chlorinated VOC emissions found in the untreated wood tests are
attributed to the presence of small amount of naturally occurring chlorine in untreated woods.
Higher concentrations of chlorinated VOCs were found in the treated wood tests, a result of
higher chlorine content in the treated wood.
3.3 Semi-Volatile Organic Compound (SVOC) Concentrations
The results of SVOC analysesare summarized in Appendix HI. Of the 87 semivolatile
organic compounds analyzed for the SVOC samples, only the following five targeted compounds
were found to be above the analytical detection limits and significantly above the field and
laboratory blank results; phenol, acetophenone, naphthalene, 2-nitrophenol and penanthrene.
Measurable amount of diethyl phthalate, di-n-butyl phthalate, and benzyl butyl phthalate were
found in all test samples, but they were also found in the field blank sample, indicating that they
were contaminants from the sampling or analytical procedure and not from the combustion of
wood waste fuel.
The total SVOC flue gas concentrations for all six tests are calculated by adding all the
quantifiable SVOC emissions in the test and are presented in Table 3-4. The typically low SVOC
TABLE 3-4 FLUE GAS SVOC CONCENTRATIONS
Test
Concentration, /zg/dscm @ 7% 02
Untreated Test 1
10.1
Untreated Test 2
11.4
Untreated Test 3
11.7
Treated Test 1
7.0
Treated Test 2
7.7
Treated Test 3
5.9
for both the untreated and treated wood tests are an indication that good combustion
were achieved during the tests. The slightly lower SVOC emissions for the treated
compared to those for the untreated wood tests also suggests that the combustion of
25
emissions
conditions
wood tests
-------
the drier treated wood fuel produced lower PIC concentrations. More moisture released during
the combustion of the "green" untreated wood fuel may lower the localized combustion zone
temperature and cause more PIC formation.
3.4 Pentachlorophenol (PCP) Destruction Efficiency
SVOC sample analysis of all three treated wood tests indicated that the concentrations of
pentachlorophenol were below the detection limit. The maximum detection limit of
pentachlorophenol for the analytical method used was 30|jg/sampling train. The concentration of
pentachlorophenol in the treated wood fuel was analyzed to be 4,100 mg/kg. The estimated
destruction efficiency (DRE) for pentachlorophenol of each treated wood fuel test has been
conservatively calculated based on the pentachlorophenol analysis practical quantitation limit
(PQL). DRE results are presented in Table 3-5. The PLQ is based on the lowest calibration
TABLE 3-5 DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY FOR PENTACHLOROPHENOL
Test
DRE, %
Treated Test 1
>99.9974
Treated Test 2
>99.9976
Treated Test 3
>99.9975
concentration and does not include factors such as percent recovery or matrix effects. It is
evident from these results that burning of the pentachlorophenol-treated waste wood in a stoker
combustor destroys the pentachlorophenol efficiently with a DRE higher than that required for
the destruction inhazardous waste incinerators (99.99%).
3.5 Dioxin/furan (PCDD/PCDF) Concentrations
PCDD/PCDF samples were analyzed and the results in total PCDD/PCDF and I-
TEQ are provided in Appendix IV. As shown in Table 3-6, total PCDD/PCDF flue gas
26
-------
TABLE 3-6 TOTAL PCDD/PCDF CONCENTRATIONS
Test
Emission Rate @ 7% 02
Total PCDD
ng/dscm
Total PCDD
ng/dscm
Total
PCDD/PCDF
ng/dscm
Total
PCDD/PCDF
ng I-TEQ/dscm
Untreated Test 1
8.43
22.29
30.72
0.509
Untreated Test 2
2.63
17.15
19.78
0.208
Untreated Test 3
0.95
11.12
12.06
0.107
Treated Test 1
15.03
42.19
57.22
1.304
Treated Test 2
20.88
56.47
77.35
1.217
Treated Test 3
18.72
45.04
63.76
1.051
concentrations from the untreated wood tests averaged 0.274 ng I-TEQ/dscm and from treated
wood tests 1.190 ng I-TEQ/dscm. These concentrations are measured prior to any control
devices, which could potentially remove part of this material from the gas stream, depending on
the fly ash collection efficiency, PCDD/PCDF formation, and solid-to-vapor-phase partitioning
of PCDD/PCDF with the device. It has been shown that most of the dioxin and furan formation
will occur at the "temperature window" of 200 and 450 °C.16 Since the temperature at the
sampling point is below 160 °C, it is reasonable to expect that the formation of dioxins has been
essentially completed by the time the gas reaches the sampling location and that the rates of
formation and desorption of fly ash associated PCDD/PCDF in a subsequent particulate
collection device would be low.17 The PCDF concentrations are significantly greater than PCDD
concentrations for both the untreated and treated wood tests, indicating de novo synthesis
formation reactions rather than condensation reactions.18 The PCDD/PCDF congener
distribution for the treated and untreated tests also differ (see Figures 3-6 through 3-9). In the
untreated wood tests, the distributions are peaked at the lower-chlorinated tetra-PCDD and di-
PCDF congeners; in the treated wood tests, the distribution is shifted to the higher-chlorinated
hexa-PCDD and penta-PCDF congeners. The PCDD/PCDF concentrations measured in both
the untreated and treated wood tests can be compared to the stack emissions from commercial
27
-------
Amount in Sample, ng
6
Mono Di Tri Tetra Penta Hexa Hepta
PCDD Congener
Figure 3.5 PCDD Congeners (Untreated Wood Tests)
Amount in Sample, ng
14
Mono
Tri Tetra Penta Hexa Hepta
PCDD Congener
Figure 3.6 PCDD Congeners (Treated Wood Tests)
28
-------
Amount in Sample, ng
Mono
Tri Tetra Penta Hexa Hepta
PCOF Congener
Figure 3.7 PCDF Congeners (Untreated Wood Tests)
Amount in Sample, ng
35
Test 2
Test 3
Mono
Tri Tetra Penta Hexa Hepta
PCDFCongener
Figure 3.8 PCDF Congeners (Treated Wood Tests)
29
-------
municipal waste combustors, which range from 0.01 to 400 ng I-TEQ/dscm.18 The PCDD/PCDF
concentrations measured in the untreated wood tests are similar to those found from burning
natural wood, which range from 0.066 to 0.214 ng I-TEQ/dscm.1 The PCDD/PCDF flue gas
concentrations in the treated wood tests are higher than the emission concentrations measured
after particulate control equipment (0.0359 ng I-TEQ/dscm) from a waste to energy plant burning
a mixture of clean wood and pentachlorophenol treated waste wood.19
The higher PCDD/PCDF concentrations from the treated wood tests compared to those
from the untreated wood tests are consistent with their higher chlorinated VOC emissions.
Approximately 200 ppm of HC1 was measured in flue gas from the treated wood tests, while HC1
was not detected in the untreated wood tests. The PCDD/PCDF samples were collected into
front half and back half of the sampling train and analyzed separately, which gives an indication
of the PCDD/PCDF associated with the particulate material and as gaseous emissions. Table 3-7
TABLE 3-7 DISTRIBUTION OF PCDD/PCDF IN SAMPLING TRAIN
Test
% of PCDD I-TEQ
in Front Half
% of PCDF I-TEQ
in Front Half
%of
PCDD/PCDF
I-TEQ in Front
Half
Untreated Test 1
33.2
25.1
27.3
Untreated Test 2
51.4
38.7
42.7
Untreated Test 3
49.3
33.4
41.3
Treated Test 1
73.6
61.5
65.2
Treated Test 2
67.2
56.7
61.0
Treated Test 3
64.8
57.0
60.5
shows that a higher portion of the total PCDD/PCDF in the treated wood tests is in the front half
catch than in the untreated wood samples. The treated tests had a higher flue gas flow rate (see
Table 3-1), which would enhance particulate load at the sampling point. The higher flue gas
flow rates during the tests with treated wood are a consequence of the manner in which the
30
-------
combustor was operated during the test. The treated wood had a higher heating value and higher
levels of excess air were used during the treated wood tests to maintain temperature at the stoker
outlet similar to temperatures obtained during the untreated wood tests. This information
suggests that particulate carryover may affect the total amount of PCDD/PCDF, especially in the
treated wood samples where a larger percentage is in the front half catch. Combustor operating
conditions in addition to the wood treatment may also contribute to higher measured
PCDD/PCDF flue gas concentrations for the treated wood tests.
3.6 Polychlorobiphenol (PCB) Concentrations
The result of the PCB analysis is attached in Appendix V and is summarized in Table 3-8.
TABLE 3-8 PCB TEST RESULTS
Test
Total PCBs
ng/dscm @ 7% 02
Untreated Test 1
79.7
Untreated Test 2
92.0
Untreated Test 3
109.1
Treated Test 1
81.0
Treated Test 2
150.2
Treated Test 3
232.3
PCB concentrations in treated wood tests are slightly higher than in the untreated wood tests. In
general, they are very low, and in line with other wood combustion data available to date ( 57-
KB ng/dscm @ 12% C02 for fluidized bed combustors and 297-22,780 ng/dscm @ 12% C02
for cell burners).3
31
-------
3.7 Aldehyde and Methane Concentrations
Methane emission from both treated and untreated wood tests were below the detection
limit of 5 ppm. Aldehyde test results are shown in Table 3-9.
TABLE 3-9 ALDEHYDE TEST RESULTS
Test
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
ug/dscm @ 7% 02
ug/dscm @ 7% 02
Untreated 1
20.4
19.2
Untreated 2
41.7
43.8
Untreated 3
53.7
7.3
Treated 1
N/A
N/A
Treated 2
30.9
5.2
Treated 3
22.7
5.8
N/A -- Not available. Sample was contaminated
Within the measurement accuracy, there seem to be no clear differences between the
treated and untreated wood tests.
3.8 Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure (TCLP) Analysis of Flyash
Flyash samples of all three untreated wood test runs were combined and a representative
sample was subjected to TCLP leachate analysis. Similarly, all three treated wood samples were
combined and analyzed . TCLP analysis results are shown in Table 3-10.
32
-------
TABLE 3-10 TCLP ANALYSIS RESULTS
Metals
Untreated Wood Tests
Treated Wood Tests
EPA Max. Level20
ppm
ppm
ppm
Arsenic
0.190
0.232
5.0
Barium
0.322
0.342
100.0
Cadmium
0.705
1.15
1.0
Chromium
1.70
1.50
5.0
Lead
1.102
0.159
5.0
Mercury
below detection
below detection
0.2
Selenium
0.037
0.033
1.0
Silver
below detection
0.024
5.0
In both treated and untreated fuel tests, TCLP result were generally within the acceptable EPA
limits and no significant differences between the two types of wood fuel could be found.
Cadmium was slightly above the EPA limit in the treated wood sample, but this can not be
explained.
4.0 CONCLUSIONS
This study was conducted to identify potential air pollution problems associated with the
combustion of waste utility poles treated with pentachlorophenol preservative for energy
production in a boiler. The emphasis of the study was placed on the characterization of the PICs
in the combustion flue gas. The methodology used was a comparative test of emissions prior to
air pollution control device of a pilot scale combustor burning untreated wood and wood treated
with pentachlorophenol preservative. The tests showed that combustion of pentachlorophenol
treated wood is an effective method of destroying the pentachlorophenol contained in the wood,
with destruction efficiencies higher than 99.99 percent. Differences in VOC, SVOC, and
PCDD/PCDF emissions from the combustion of untreated and treated wood fuels have been
noted. The data do not enable identification of the exact cause of these differences in emissions.
33
-------
These differences are possibly caused by the significantly different moisture content, heating
value, and chlorine content of the two fuels. The difference in flue gas flow rate required for the
combustion of these two fuels with different combustion characteristics (moisture content and
heating value) may also cause the differences in PCDD/PCDF emissions. The flue gas
concentrations are strongly influenced by the design and operation of the combustor system and
may not be quantitatively comparable to other combustors.
5.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
The project was performed following the guides established under the EPA, Office of
Research and Development Level EI Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) procedures. All
procedures and methods noted in the QAPP were implemented with the exception of the method
employed to determine the fuel throughput rates.
The overall results of all quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) measures,
undertaken to assess the quality of the collected data, are summarized in this section. Included in
this section is a brief description of the data quality analysis procedures that were implemented.
The following subsections briefly address the quality of data achieved and provide QA/QC
considerations. A separate subsection summarizes the results of a Performance Evaluation Audit
(PEA).
Nearly all the objectives for the Data Quality Indicators (DQIs) were met for the project.
As noted in the QAPP, the most critical measurements were the following;
02, CO, and C02 CEM measurements,
Underfire, overfire, sweep and total air flow rates,
Air and flue gas temperatures,
PCDD/PCDF analysis from the sampled flue gas,
VOC analysis from the sampled flue gas,
SVOC analysis from the sampled flue gas, and
Waste wood feed rates.
All of the calculated critical measurement objectives were met or exceeded. The results of all the
calculated data quality indicators are summarized in the appropriate subsections.
34
-------
5.1 Data Quality Indicators
The DQIs that were considered in planning and executing the project were accuracy,
precision, and completeness. The calculation for each of these parameters is presented separately
below.
5.1.1 Accuracy
Accuracy is assessed by comparing measured values to certified or "known" standards.
For determining the accuracy of CEM analyzers, values as measured and recorded by the CEM
sampling system are compared to known concentrations of certified gases introduced into the
analyzers. Accuracy for the integrated samples is assessed by spiking samples with a known
quantity of the target analyte(s) onto the clean sampling media prior to analysis. Another method
is to analyze known surrogates following and prior to analyzing the samples. The accuracy can
then be reported as either a percent error (% bias) or as a percent recovered (% accuracy).
Bias can be determined using the following formula:
Accuracy, expressed as percent recovered, can be determined from the following formula:
In many cases, multi-component spikes or surrogates are measured to determine DQIs. In such
cases, the average of the bias or recovery for all spikes is used to determine an overall percent
bias or recovery for the measurement system.
5.1.2 Precision
Precision is defined as the reproducibility of measured results. Method precision can be
assessed through the collection, analysis, and measurement of duplicate samples that are
collected simultaneously or at similar conditions. From this method, precision can be determined
as a relative difference between the duplicate results. As a relative difference, the precision
Percent Bias
measured concentration - known concentration
known concentration
Percent Recovery =
measured concentration 1 „„
x 100
known concentration
35
-------
limits can be calculated from the following:
(C1+C2)/ 2
RPD = x 100
where:
C, = larger of the two measured values
C2— smaller of the two measured values
In some cases, replicate data is pooled to determine precision as a relative standard deviation
(RSD) of the measured data. This method of determining the precision can be calculated as
follows:
_ standard deviation of replicate measurements ^
average of replicate measurements
For continuous monitors, precision was determined as the relative difference between
measurements for pre-test and post-test calibrations. For integrated samples with multi-
component spikes or surrogates, precision is better represented as a relative standard deviation.
5.1.3 Completeness
Completeness is defined as the ratio of the number of valid analytical results obtained to
the number of samples required in the prescribed test matrix. Causes for not producing valid
analytical results include sample loss from breakage, mis-identified samples, errors in the sample
recovery or analysis, or instrument failure during sampling operations. Completeness is derived
from the following:
„ , ^ amount of valid data collected ,
Completeness = x 100
intended collectable data
Nearly all aspects of the project were completed. No deviations from the original test matrix
were made except for the elimination of a duplicate PCDD/PCDF sample that was to be
extracted during the second treated waste wood test. The only other incomplete item from the
original test matrix was a YOST sample tube that was broken during transportation to the
36
-------
analytical lab. All other samples and measurements as defined by the QAPP were fully
completed. Therefore, completeness will not be discussed or presented in the following
subsections.
5.2 Summary of Quality Assurance and Quality Control Results
Specific information relating to the sampling and analysis results is presented in
Appendices n, HI, IV, and V along with the details pertaining to the data quality evaluation
effort. The QA/QC assessment summary is provided in the appropriate following subsections.
The summaries include the DQI objectives, as posted in the QAPP, and results obtained for each
measurement. Measurement parameters that exceed DQI objectives are further explained in the
appropriate subsections.
5.2.1 Continuous Emission Monitors
The CEM sampling system is divided into three subsystems. The first subsystem is
devoted to analyzing 02, C02 and CO which are insoluble or nearly insoluble in water. The
second subsystem is devoted to measuring NOx and THC gases which may be dissolved or
scrubbed by condensation. The third subsystem is the Perkin Elmer Multi-Component Analyzer.
The 02, C02 and CO analyzers were leak checked and calibrated daily, prior to the tests,
according to EPA Method 3A and EPA Method 10. The calibration was a two point calibration
with nitrogen for zero and a span gas of a value greater than 80% of the anticipated range. A two
point drift check with the same gases was performed daily at the end of tests. The NOx and THC
analyzers were leak checked and calibrated according to EPA Method 7E and EPA Method 25
respectively. Prior to testing, the analyzers were calibrated at two points with zero and span
gases. Following the test the instruments were drift checked with the same zero and span gases.
Likewise, the Perkin Elmer system was calibrated with a two point check prior to the test. The
Perkin Elmer however could not be drift checked upon the completion of the test. The system is
designed to automatically purge and recalculate the measured values during the calibration
procedure; any drift information would have been lost during a post-test check. All sample
systems were bias checked according to EPA Method 6C prior to the start of the first test.
The values recorded for the calibrations and the drift check are used to determine the
accuracy and precision of the measurement devices. Because the Perkin Elmer could not be drift
37
-------
checked the accuracy and precision for HC1, a non-critical measurement, could not be
determined. For the other instruments, the percent bias was calculated from the difference
between the measured spans for system drift check and the known concentration of the certified
span gases. The precision was calculated as the relative percent difference between the values
measured during the pre-test calibrations and the drift checks. The summary of data quality
achieved for each test and the system bias check is presented in Table 5-1.
In two tests, the second untreated wood and the first treated wood, the C02 precision
barely missed the DQI goal. In multiple test runs the DQI goals were not met for THC and NOx.
However, THC and NOx are non-critical measurements for this project.
5.2.2 Overfire, Underfire, Sweep and Total Air Flows
The flow measuring devices were not specifically calibrated for this project. The flows
for the system are measured with restrictive type venturi and orifice type devices coupled with
pressure transducers and accompanying panel meters. Because of the limited number of
variables which can affect the performance of the venturi, calibrations are performed biannually
only on the pressure transducers and panel meters. A detailed description of the calibration
procedures was presented in the QAPP. The pressure transducers deliver a 4 mA output signal
when the differential pressure is zero and a 20 mA output signal when the differential pressure is
25 inches of water pressure. The transducers were calibrated at their limits and compared to a
hand-held pressure calibrator. The hand-held calibrator was then used to verify the transducer to
meter outputs when the transducer was exposed to a mid-range differential pressure. The
summary of the data quality achieved for the flow measuring transducers is presented in
Table 5-2.
Although the transducers alone displayed non-linearity in the middle of the range and thus
greater percent bias, when connected to the panel meter, a square root extracting meter, the non-
linear tendencies are removed. The overall result is a system that is much more accurate than the
individual components. The system measurements are very repeatable, yielding precision
calculated as relative standard deviations less than 1 percent. The DQI objectives for bias and
precision , as noted in the QAPP, were set at 10 percent; all measurements met the DQI
objectives.
38
-------
TABLE 5-1 SUMMARY OF DATA QUALITY ACHIEVED FOR CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORS
o,
CO,
CO
TIIC
NO,
Tcsl
Objective
Res u l(
Objective
Result
Objective
Result
Ohjeclive
Result
Objective
Result
SysteniBias
Bias
5%
<1%
5%
2.6%
5%
1.7%
5%
4.5%
5%
<1%
Untreated 1
Dins
5%
2.3%
5%
3.1%
5%
<1%
5%
5.3%
5%
31%
1'incision (KIM))
5%
2.3%
5%
2.8%
5%
<1%
5%
•1.45%
5%
26.1%
I)ntrealed2
Bins
5%
2.5%
5%
3.8%
5%
<1%
5%
7.9%
5%
H%
Precision (KIM))
5%
3.3%
5%
6%
5%
1.3%
5%
(.%
5%
8.2%
Untreated}
Bias
5%
'1.6%
5%
3.7%
5%
<1%
5%
4.7%
5%
9.5%
Precision (RPD)
5%
4.6%
5%
2.8%
5%
<1%
5%
4.7%
5%
9.9%
Treated 1
Bias
5%
'1.1%
5%
4.4%
5%
<1%
5%
3.6%
5%
10.3%
Precision (IM'D)
5%
4.9%
5%
5.3%
5%
<1%
5%
4.1%
5%
10.3%
Tiealed2
Bias
5%
3.6%
5%
3.7%
5%
<1%
5%
2.3%
5%
13.5%
Precision (RPD)
5%
3.8%
5%
3.0%
5%
<1%
5%
1.4%
5%
15.5%
Trealed3
[lias
5%
3.8%
5%
3.9%
5%
<1%
5%
<1%
5%
17.9%
Precision (RPD)
5%
4.2%
5%
3.7%
5%
<1%
5%
<1%
5%
15.9%
-------
TANLR 5-2 SUMMARY OF DATA QUALI TY ACHIEVED FOR FLOW MEASUREMENT DEVICES
Pressure Transducer
I'ressure Transducer and Meter
Zero Differential I'ressure
Differential I'roiSlire »l Spun
Differential pressure set at
arbitrary middle of ranye
iiienstiriMl
expected
measured
calculated
measured
calculated
Precision
in A
in A
liias
in A
•n A
bias
C fill
Cflll
It i :t s
ItSI)
301
Toiul Air
3. 990
4
0.25 %
19 907
19.92
0.08 %
500
504 2
-3
oe
<1%
302
Durncr Air
3.982
1
0.45 %
19.837
19.91
0.53 %
123
123.3
0 21 %
< 1 " i>
301
Ovurllii: Air
3.983
1
0-11 %
19.8-16
19 17
2 . I I -/«
172
158 (1
K 80%
-1%
301
IJnilerfirc Air
3.986
1
0.35%
19 857
19.79
0.34 %
490
497.1
1.43 %
<1%
305
Rcciictilalioii
3.990
1
0.25%
19.867
19.80
0.33 %
246
263.7
6 70 %
<1%
306
Sweep Air
3.988
1
0.30 %
19.873
19.91
0.19%
79
75.9
4 08 %
<1%
4*.
o
-------
5.2.3 Temperatures
The thermocouples throughout the system were not removed for calibration purposes.
Most of the thermocouples are mounted through the walls of the combustor. Removal of the
thermocouple would result in destroying the thermocouples or damaging the refractive lining of
the combustor. The thermocouple used to measure the combustor temperature nearest the fuel
bed was a Type B, platinum/rhodium, thermocouple. The B type thermocouples are rated by the
manufacturer for a bias of 0.5 C° over 800 °C and a maximum temperature of 1700 °C. The
remaining thermocouples are all K-type, nickel-chromium/nickel-aluminum, thermocouples rated
for a bias of 2.2 C° above 0 °C and a maximum temperature of 1250 °C. All the test conditions
throughout the project were maintained well below the ratings for the thermocouples. In
addition, the measured temperatures are critical for comparative reasons. The temperatures are
used to set the system conditions and relate the conditions from one test to another. Although the
temperatures are considered critical, errors in the temperature measurements will not affect the
overall scope or objectives of the project.
5.2.4 PCDD/PCDF Sampling and Analysis
All PCDD/PCDF samples were collected, prepared, and analyzed according to the
prescribed methods referenced in the QAPP. The samples were analyzed by a commercial
laboratory with a high resolution GC/MS. Appendix IV contains the PCDD/PCDF analysis data.
Also included are the data quality indicators for each sample analysis. Recovery of a known
standard was used to determine the bias and precision for each sample analyzed. Because the lab
reported the percent recovered from the known standards, the bias was determined from the
average and the precision from the relative standard deviation. This is not in keeping with the
strict definition of precision because the deviation is not determined for repeated analysis of the
same surrogate. This does however determine the precision for each specific analysis over the
spectrum of the instrument. The PCDD/PCDF samples were analyzed as front half and back half
portions of the sampling train. The summary of the data quality achieved for the analyses of each
portion for each test is presented in Table 5-3. All recoveries and precision were maintained
within the limits prescribed by the QAPP.
41
-------
TABLE 5-3 DATA QUALITY ACHIEVED FOR THE PCDD/PCDF ANALYSES
Test
Front Hail Portion
Hack Half Portion
Average Bias
Average Precision
Average Bias
Average Precision
Objective
Result
Objective
Result
Objective
Result
Objective
Result
Blank
50%
17.0%
30%
12.7%
50%
9.50%
30%
9.20%
Untreated!
50%
31.2%
30%
27.5%
50%
23:7%
30%
13.1%
Untreatetl2
50%
12.0%
30%
20.1%
50%
16.4%
30%
13.0%
UiurealetO
50%
2'1.6%
30%
18.2%
50%
10.9%
30%
16.7%
Treated 1
50%
1.70%
30%
9.39%
50%
13.2%
30%
12.5%
Treated2
50%
14.7%
30%
14.3%
50%
25.2%
30%
16.8%
Trealed3
50%
2.69%
30%
31.9
50%
26.9%
30%
17.4%
Field Blank
50%
5.60%
30%
12.4%
50%
17.5%
30%
13.3%
-------
5.2.5 SVOC Sampling and Analysis
All SVOC samples were prepared and analyzed according to the prescribed methods
referenced in the QAPP. The samples were analyzed by the on-site laboratory with GC/MS.
Appendix IE contains the SVOC analysis data. Also included are the data quality indicators for
each sample analysis. Recoveries of known surrogates were used to determine the bias and
precision for each sample analyzed. Because the lab reported the percent recovered from the
surrogates, the bias was determined from the average and the precision from the relative standard
deviation. This is not in keeping with the strict definition of precision because the deviation is
not determined for repeated analyses of the same surrogate. This does however determine the
precision for each specific analysis over the spectrum of the instrument. The summary of the
data quality achieved for the analyses is presented in Table 5-4. All recoveries and precision
were maintained within the limits prescribed by the QAPP.
5.2.6 PCB Sampling and Analysis
All PCB samples were prepared and analyzed according to the prescribed methods
referenced in the QAPP. The samples were analyzed by a commercial laboratory with a high
resolution GC/MS. Appendix V contains the PCB analysis data. Also included are the data
quality indicators for each sample analysis. Recovery of known standards was used to determine
the bias and precision for each sample analyzed. Because the lab reported the percent recovered
from the standards, the bias was determined from the average and the precision from the relative
standard deviation. This is not in keeping with the strict definition of precision because the
deviation is not determined for repeated analysis of the same surrogate. This does however
determine the precision for each specific analysis over the spectrum of the instrument. The
summary of the data quality achieved for the analyses is presented in Table 5-5. All recoveries
and precision were maintained within the limits prescribed by the QAPP.
5.3 Internal Audits
An internal technical systems audit (TSA) was performed by the Acurex Environmental
QA Officer on August 14, 1996. The auditor observed sampling activities which included the
43
-------
TABLE 5-4 DATA QUALITY ACHIEVED FOR SVOC ANALYSES
Test
Bias
Precision
Objective
Result
Objective | Result
Field Blank
50%
12.7%
30%
11.4%
Untreated 1
50%
6.40%
30%
12.2%
Untreated2
50%
22.1%
30%
22.1%
Untreated3
50%
9.90%
30%
25.3%
Treatedl
50%
10.3%
30%
17.2%
Treated!
50%
7.87%
30%
13.2%
TreatedS
50%
14.7%
30%
15.4%
44
-------
TABLE 5-5 DATA QUALITY ACHIEVED FOR PCB ANALYSES
Test
Bias
Precision
Objective
Result
Objective
Result
Blank
50%
30.7%
30%
12.1%
Untreated 1
50%
25.0%
30%
13.3%
Untreated!
50%
37.3%
30%
10.0%
Untreatedj
50%
33.7%
30%
10.4%
Treated!
50%
33.1%
30%
12.3%
Treated2
50%
35.3%
30%
9.49%
Treatedj
50%
25.1%
30%
14.8%
Field Blank
50%
30.1%
30%
9.20%
Lab Blank | 50%
38.0%
30%
5.98%
Lab Blank 50%
31.3%
30%
3.62%
45
-------
review of sampling and analytical documentation procedures. The auditor observed setup and
breakdown procedures for VOST, MM5, and Method 23 sampling trains and sampling for
methane and aldehydes using Tedlar bags and DNPH cartridges. Calibration records for
sampling pumps and weigh balances were verified. It was noted by the WA Leader that the fuel
(chipped wood) did not feed as well as expected due to larger pieces. At times, the feed had to
be manually shoved down into the burner. The day of the audit there were some minor problems
controlling the temperature which were related to the inconsistency in the feed. All problems
were recorded in the project notebook. The internal TSA resulted in no major findings.
An internal performance evaluation audit (PEA) was performed to evaluate the Organic
Support Laboratory's (OSL's) ability to identify and quantitate semi volatile organic compounds
(SVOCs). The Acurex Environmental QA Officer prepared a PEA sample using a 2000 ug/mL
mix of SVOCs that included the target compounds for the project. The mix (25 uL) was spiked
onto a cleaned XAD cartridge and submitted to the Organic Support Laboratory for analysis. The
cartridge was spiked to result in a 1 mL final extraction volume with a final concentration of 50
ug for each target analyte. The sample was extracted by the OSL and a report was submitted to
the QA Officer from the OSL. Table 5-6 shows OSL results for target analytes and percent
recovery for each compound. All compounds were correctly identified and recovered within the
data quality indicator goals established for accuracy for this project.
46
-------
TABLE 5-6 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AUDIT
Compound
Reported (ug)
% Recovery*
Naphthalene
36.7
73.4
Acenaphthylene
34.6
69.2
Acenaphthene
39.3
78.6
Fluorene
42.3
84.6
Phenanthrene
45.7
91.4
Anthracene
45.4
90.8
Di-n-butyl phthalate
41.7
83.4
Fluoranthene
40.3
80.6
Pyrene
49.7
99.4
Benzo(a)anthracene
41.9
83.8
Chrysene
42.1
84.2
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
42.3
84.6
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
49.0
98.0
Benzo(a)pyrene
44.9
89.8
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
42.5
85.0
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
37.6
75.2
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
45.3
90.6
* Based on theoretical concentration of 50 ug for each target analyte.
47
-------
6.0 REFERENCES
1. B. Schatowitz, G. Brandt, F. Gafner, E. Schlumpf, R. Buhler, P. Hasler, and T. Nussbaumer,
"Dioxin Emissions from Wood Combustion," Chemosphere. 29 (9-11): 2005 (1994).
2. T. Salthammer, H. Klipp, R. D. Peek, and R. Marutzky, "Formation of Polychlorinated
Dibenzo-p-dioxins (Pcdd) and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans (Pcdf) During the Combustion of
Impregnated Wood," Chemosphere. 30 (11): 2051 (1995).
3. Environmental Risk Limited, "Wood Products in the Waste Stream Characterization and
Combustion Emissions, Vol. 1," NTIS No. PB93-198950, November 1992.
4. Method 1A, "Sampling and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources with Small Stacks or
Ducts," 40CFR, Part 60, Appendix A.
5. EPA SW Method 0030, "Volatile Organic Sampling Train," Test Methods for Evaluating
Solid Wastes, 1, EPA SW-846 (NTIS PB88-239223), Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Solid Waste, Washington, DC, September 1986.
6. EPA SW Method 5040, "Protocol for Analysis of Sorbent Cartridges from Volatile Organic
Sampling Train," Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes, 1, EPA SW-846 (NTIS PB88-
239223), Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste, Washington, DC, September
1986.
7. EPA SW Method 8240, "Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometry for Organic Volatiles," Test
Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes, 1, EPA SW-846 (NTIS PB88-239223), Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste, Washington, DC, September 1986.
48
-------
8. EPA SW Method 0010, "Modified Method 5 Sampling Train," Test Methods for Evaluating
Solid Wastes, 1, EPA SW-846 (NTIS PB88-239223), Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Solid Waste, Washington, DC, September 1986.
9. EPA SW Method 8270B, "Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometry for Semivolatile Organics:
Capillary Column Technique," Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes, 1, EPA SW-846
(NTIS PB88-239223), Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste, Washington,
DC, September 1986.
10. EPA Method 23, "Determination of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Polychlorinated
Dibenzofurans from Stationary Sources," Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 60,
Appendix A, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1991.
11. W.T. Winberry, L. Forehand, N.T. Murphy, A. Ceroli, and B. Phinney, EPA Method 1P-6A,
"Determination of Formaldehyde and Other Aldehydes in Indoor Air," Compendium of Methods
for the Determination of Pollutants in Indoor Air, EPA/600/4-90/010, NTIS PB90-200288, April
1990.
12. EPA Method 0040, "Sampling of Principal Organic Hazardous Constituents from
Combustion Sources Using Tedlar Bags," Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes 2, SW-846,
NTIS PB88-239223, EPA, Office of Solid Wastes, Washington, DC, January 1995.
13. EPA Method 18, "Measurement of Gaseous Organic Compound Emissions by Gas
Chromatography," CFR, Part 60, Appendix A, July 1, 1995.
14. C 702-87, Method B - Quartering, "Standard Practice for Reducing Field Samples of
Aggregate to Testing Size," Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 04.02, 1987.
49
-------
15. EPA Method 1311, "Toxic Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP)," Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid Wastes, EPA Report No. SW-846, Vol. 1, Sect.C, EPA, Office of Solid Waste,
Washington, DC, September 1986.
16. H. Vogg and L. Stieglitz, "Thermal Behavior of PCDD/PCDF in Fly Ash from Incinerators,"
Chemosphere, 15: 9 (1986).
17. U.S. EPA, Municipal Waste Combustors ~ Background Information for Proposed Standards,
Post-combustion Technology Performance, Vol. 3, EPA-450/3-89-27c (NTIS PB90-154865),
Research Triangle Park, NC, August 1989.
18. J. D. Kilgroe, "Control of Dioxin, Furan, and Mercury Emissions from Municipal Waste
Combustors." Journal of Hazardous Materials. 47: 163 (1996).
19. G. E. Lipinski, "Trial Burn Report and Permit Application, Viking Energy of McBain MI,"
Submitted to Michigan Department of Natural Resources, July 14, 1995.
20. "Maximum Concentration of Contaminants for Toxicity Characteristic," Code of Federal
Regulations, Title 40, Part 261.24, Rule 0006-21, July 1,1995.
50
-------
APPENDIX I CEMDATA
1-1
-------
S02 Concentration for Untreated Wood Test 1
Normalized to 7% 02
60
55
S
a
a
z
o
5
z
Ui
g 20 .
8 15 ¦
TIME
SO -
55 -
50 -
45 -
40
35 -
30
25 -
20 -
15 -
10 -
5 -
0
S02 Concentration for Untreated Wood Test 2
Normalized to 7% 02
TIME
S02 Concentration for Untreated Wood Test 3
Normalized to 7% 02
1-2
-------
THC Concentration for Untreated Wood Test 1
Normalized to 7% 02
THC Concentration for Untreated Wood Test 2
Normalized to 7% 02
TIME
300
280
260
240
?
220
a
200
Z
O
180
P
160
S
14f)
h-
z
120
o
z
100
o
o
80
tiO
40
20
0
THC Concentration for Untreated Wood Test 3
Normalized to 7% 02
Jl
_i—i A.
TIME
1-3
-------
HCI Concentration for Untreated Wood Test 1
Normalized to 7% 02
HCI Concentration for Untreated Wood Test 2
Normalized to 7% 02
HCI Concentration for Untreated Wood Test 3
Normalized to 7% 02
0.75 ¦
s
Q.
a.
z
o
f=
S
0.5 -
P
2
Ui
o
8 0.25 ¦ ¦
TIME
1-4
-------
NOx Concentration for Untreated Wood Test 1
Normalized to 7% 02
400
350
I" 300
a
a.
~ 250
2
o
p
§
H
200
ui 150
u
2
8 100
TIME
NOx Concentration for Untreated Wood Test 2
Normalized to 7% 02
400
350 -¦
^ 300 • -
a
a
~ 250-•
2
o
F
2
>—
200 -•
2 150
O
Z
§ 100
50 ••
TIME
NOx Concentration for Untreated Wood Test 3
Normalized to 7% 02
400
f 300
a
a
250
2
0
1
H
200 •
§ 150 - -
O
2
8 100 •
TIME
1-5
-------
CO Concentration for Untreated Wood Test 1
Normalized to 7% 02
3000 j-j
2800 ¦
2500 ¦
2400 -
2200 ¦
a
2000 -¦
z
O
1300 ¦
P
1600 •
2
1400
z
Ui
1200 ¦
0
?
1000 -
0
0
800 --
600 •
400 -
200
0...
A
.jlL
Ll
Uw u
.L
TIME
CO Concentration for Untreated Wood Test 2
Normalized to 7% 02
3000
2800
2600
2400
2200
2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
300
600
400
200
0
1
JL
i .
TIME
CO Concentration for Untreated Wood Test 3
Normalized to 7% 02
3000 -
2800 -
2600 ¦ •
2400 -
2200 -
2000 -
1800 -
1600 -
1400 -(.
1200 -
1000 -
800 -
600 -
400 -
200 -
0 ^
I
TIME
J
k. .. l..j
ajL
1-6
-------
C02 Concentration for Untreated Wood Test 1 (
i
20
18
16
14
12
1Q
8
6
4
2
0
TIME
C02 Concentration for Untreated Wood Test 2
18 -
16 ••
z
in
O
z
o
o
2 -
TIME
C02 Concentration for Untreated Wood Test 3
1-7
-------
02 Concentration for Untreated Wood Test 1
20
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
TIME
02 Concentration for Untreated Wood Test 2
z
o
I-
2
Z
a
z
a
a
TIME
02 Concentration for Untreated Wood Test 3
14
10
Z
O
O
TIME
1-8
-------
02 Concentration for Treated Wood Test 1
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
TIME
02 Concentration for Treated Wood Test 2
18 •-
2
h-
z
Ol
CJ
z
o
u
10 -¦
TIME
02 Concentration for Treated Wood Test 3
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
TIME
1-9
-------
C02 Concentration for Treated Wood Test 1
C02 Concentration for Treated Wood Test 2
C02 Concentration for Treated Wood Test 3
18
z
o
J-
S
Z
Ui
o
z
o
o
1-10
-------
CO Concentration for Treated Wood Test 1
Normalized to 7% 02
1500 j
1400 •
1300 -
1200 •
TIME
CO Concentration for Treated Wood Test 2
Normalized to 7% 02
1500 -
1400 -
1300 --
1200 --
1100
1000 •-
900 --
800 -
700 -
600 --
500
400 ¦
300 --
200 -
1C0 -
0 ¦
TIME
CO Concentration for Treated Wood Test 3
Normalized to 7% 02
1500
1400
1300
1200
1100 -¦
1000
900
800 -•
700 ••
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
, aA..
Jj5 I
i
ll
TIME
1-11
-------
NOx Concentration for Treated Wood Test 1
Normalized to 7% 02
1000
900
800
I 700
a
600
z
o
p
2
w
500
z
UJ
o
z
o
o
400
300
200
100
TIME
NOx Concentration for Treated Wood Test 2
Normalized to 7% 02
1000
900 ¦-
_ 800 • •
| 700 --
| 600
500
400 -
2
UJ
o
z
o
200
100
TIME
NOx Concentration for Treated Wood Test 3
Normalized to 7% 02
1000
900
_ 800
| 700
600
z
o
p
2
H
z
500
400
ui
o
z
O
o
300
200
100 •
1-12
-------
THC Concentration for Treated Wood Test 1
Normalized to 7% 02
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
TIME
THC Concentration for Treated Wood Test 2
Normalized to 7% 02
THC Concentration for Treated Wood Test 3
Normalized to 7% 02
100
90 --
- 30
=
& 70 ••
Z
o
H
60 -•
I so-
Z 40 -
UJ
- 30 --
z
o
o
20
10 --
TIME
1-13
-------
HCI Concentration for Treated Wood Test 1
Normalized to 7% 02
500
450
400
?
a
a
350
§ 300
2
250
S 200
o
§ 150
u
100
50 -•
TIME
HC! Concentration for Treated Wood Test 2
Normalized to 7% 02
500
450
_ 400 --
S
| 350 ¦¦
§ 300-¦
- 250 - •
I
iz 200
Ui
z 150
O
° 100
TIME
500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
HCI Concentration for Treated Wood Test 3
Normalized to 7% 02
ITfl
|V.
TIME
1-14
-------
S02 Concentration for Treated Wood Test 1
Normalized to 7% 02
20 j
18 ¦
16 ¦
I 14 -
a
I '2 '
i 10 ¦
H
TIME
S02 Concentration for Treated Wood Test 2
Normalized to 7% 02
U
S02 Concentration far Treated Wood Test 3
Normalized to 7% 02
TIME
1-15
-------
H20 Concentration for Treated Wood Test 1
TIME
H20 Concentration for Treated Wood Test 3
30
27
24
21
18
15
12
9
6
3
0
TIME
H20 Concentration for Treated Wood Test 2
24 -•
z
o
<
X
H
Z
Ui
U
z
o
o
1-16
-------
H20 Concentration for Treated Wood Test 1
30
£ 21 -
z
p 18 '
z
Ui
(J
z
o
O
H20 Concentration for Treated Wood Test 2
TIME
H20 Concentration for Treated Wood Test 3
1-17
-------
H20 Concentration for Untreated Wood Test 1
30
27
24
21
18
15
12
9
6
3
0
TIME
H20 Concentration for Untreated Wood Test 2
z
o
p
S
»-
z
Ui
O
z
o
o
TIME
H20 Concentration for Untreated Wood Test 3
1-18
-------
APPENDIX n VOC SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
II-1
-------
Client ID:
Filename :
TLI Id :
Matrix :
Units :
Triangle Laboratories of RTP
..-project Summary for Project 38560
VVWC-VOST-1 VV\^OVOST-1 WWCS^(5sT-2
-1TC
FT098 H (
135-64-1
VOST
ug
-2 T/TC
FT099 &/
135-84-2A,B
VOST
ug
-1 T/TC
(JiV.
FT100
135-84-3A3
VOST
ug
WWC-VOST-2 WWC-VOST-3
-2 T/TC -1 T/TC
FT101 d!Z^ FT102 3
135-84^A,B ' ' 135-&t-6A,B
VOST VOST
ug ug
Chloromethane
0-234
QJS22
0382
{£288
0.158
Vinyl Chloride
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
1,3-Butadiene
(0.001) III
MB
(0 001)
0.004
0.027
Bromomethane
0.013
6.028
0.020
0.014
om3
Chloroethane
• (0.002)
(0.002)
(0.002)
(0.002)
(0.002)
Vinyl bromide
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
T richlorofluoromethane
OJ3Q6
6.012
0.010
&00S
0.063:
1,1-Dichloroethene
(0.001)
(0.001) '
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Iodomethane
' 0.012
0.009
0.042
0013
0.005
Carbon disulfide
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Acetone
(0.002) 11
0,133
0.077
0.089
0.031
Allyl chloride
(0.002)
(0.002)
(0.002)
(0.002)
(0.002)
Methylene chloride |§|§
0,035
0.DS3
0-.121'
O.0&9
' 0.557
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
tert-Butyl methyl ether
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Acrylonitrile
(0.004)
0.012
(0.004)
(0.004) H
MUM
n-Hexane
(0.001)
oxm
llillllliil 111
0.005
(0.001)
1,1-DichIoroethane
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
1,2-Epoxybutane
(0.004)
(0.004)
(0.004)
(0.004)
(0.004)
cis-l,2-Dichloroethene
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Chloroform
(0.001)
O.OIO
0.003 „
0,003
0.002
1,2-Dichloroethane
(0.001)
1X015
0.101
iillSHii
(0.001)
Isooctane
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Vinyl acetate
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
2-Butanone
(0.007)
(0.007)
(0.007)
(0.006)
(0.006)
1,1/1-Trichloroethane
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Carbon tetrachloride
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
0X001)
(0.001)
Benzene
0,010
- 0.292.
0.126
0.247
0.591
Trichloroethene
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
1,2-Dichloropropane
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Ethyl acrvlate
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Methyl methacrylate
(0.002)
(0.002)
(0.002)
(0.002)
(0.002)
Bromodichloromethane
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
trans-l^-Dichloropropene
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
( )-Estimated Detection Limit Page 1
Triangle Laboratories of RTP, Inc. Savarv3.5
SOX Capitola Drive * Durham, North Carolina 27713 Printed: 16:15:17 09/13/96
Phone: (919) 544-3729 • Fax; (919) 54^5491 - q '
n-2 3
-------
Client ID:
Filename:
TO Id :
Matrix :
Units :
wwc-vc
Triangle Laboratories of RTP
Proj ect Summary for Proj ect 3.8560
-1TC
FT098 et!
135-84-1
VOST
ug
WWt^v'oST-1
-2T/TC
FT099 £ /
135-84-2A,B
VOST
ug
WWC-VOST-2
jr//s/
WWC-VOST-2 WWC-VOST-3
-1T/TC -2T/TC -1T/TC
(/LOfs&A (yc/-17
-------
Client ID:
Filename:
TUId :
Matrix :
Units :
J7'
VVWC-^
y/j
rc-VOST-3
-2 T/TC
FT103 M-J
135-84-7 A,B
VOST
ug
Triangle Laboratories of RTP
Project Summary for Project 38560
€¦/ 7~o
WWC-
WWC-VOST-4
-1 T/TC
FT104 ^ f
135-84-8A,B
VOST
US
¦VOST-4
-2 T/TC
FT105 * /
135-84-9A,B
VOST
ug
V/c,
WWC-VOST-5
-1 T/TC
'/'£i£A-C£'3
FT106 ^ Z-
135-84-10A,B "
VOST
ug
tf/Z,
WWC-VOST-5
-2 T/TC
FT107 ^ Z-
135-S4-11A,B
VOST
ug
Chloromethane
, 0-244
, 0-325
0.728 -
„ 1-143
0.904
Vinyl Chloride
(0.001)
(0.002)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
1,3-Butadiene
(0.001)
(0.002)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Bromomethane
¦0.038
0.094
0232.
0.577
0144
Chloroethane
" (0.002)
(0.002)
(0.002)
(0.002)
(0.002)
Vinyl bromide
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
T richlo rofl uo romethane
iiiHUi i
G.04S
HIllilH III
O.05Q
8,005
1,1-Dichloroethene
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Iodomethane
Q-1S2
0.007
0.031
0.092
0J31-6
Carbon disulfide
(0.001)
0.807 '
0-004
(0.001)
Acetone
II8I1I1H
(0.002) 111
0-099
0.103
liilliiir
Allyl chloride
(0.002)
(0.002)
(0.002)
(0.002)
(0.002)
Methylene chloride |||||
I1HSP 1
0.062
0-31S
siiiiiii
lIlliH
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
tert-Butyl methyl ether
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
illllllieis
(0.001)
Acrylonitrile
(0.004)
(0.005)
(0.004)
(0.004)
(0.004)
n-Hexane
0.013
0.005
0.013
0-Q17
lilllii!
1,1-Dichloroethane
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
1,2-Epoxybutane
(0.004)
(0.005)
(0.004)
(0.004)
(0.004)
cis-l,2-Dichloroethene
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Chloroform ||§1§
0.0C-4
0-037
0.021
0.019
0.020
1,2-Dichloroethane
(0.001)
0.OI8
0.017
O.Q03
0.011
Isooctane
(0.001)
(0.001) 111
OiJOl
(0.001)
Vinyl acetate
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
2-Butanone
(0.006)
(0.007)
(0.006)
(0.007)
(0.006)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001) 111
iiiiiiloi
(0.001)
Carbon tetrachloride
(0.001) 1
0-012
OfllD
iillili;: ill
iiiiiila:
Benzene
0.0S7
„ 0.015
0.033
-0-030
0.026
Trichloroethene
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
1,2-Dichloropropane
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Ethyl acrylate
o.oos
(0.001)
(0.001) 11
mi
(0.001)
Methvl methacrvlate
(0.001)
(0.002)
(0.002)
(0.002)
(0.001)
Bromodichloromethane
(0.001)
liilliiir ill
lllllliffil
(0.001)
(0.001)
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
trans-1 ,3-Dichlo ropropene
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
( (-Estimated Detection Limit Page 3
Triangle Laboratories of RTP, Inc
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax; (919) 544-5491
n-4
Savar v3.5
Printed: 16:15:17 09/13/ 96
11
-------
Triangle Laboratories of RTP
p, / Project Summary for Project 38560
Client ID:
WWC-VOST-3
WWC-VOST-4
WWC-VOST-4
WWC-VOST-5
WWC-VOST-5 .
-2 T/TC
-1T/TC
-2 T/TC
-1 T/TC
-2 T/TC
knej>
Filename:
FT103 £ 3
FT104 ^7
FT105 M/
FT106 ^ ^
FT107
TO Id :
135-84-7 A,B
135-84-8A,B
135-84-9A,B
135-84-10A,B
* 135-$4-llA,B
Matrix :
VOST
VOST
VOST
VOST
VOST
Units :
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
1,1^-Trichloroethane
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Dibromochloromethane
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Ethylene dibromide
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(.0.001)
Bromoform
(0.001)
(0.002)
(0.002)
(0.002)
(0.001)
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
' (0.001)
(0.002)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Toluene
0.038
0-006
0.039
- 0.037
SIMM;
T etrachloroethene
(0.001) 11
e.ooi
- O.G03
0.006
(0.001) .
2-Hexanone
(0.001)
(0.002)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Chlorobenzene
Q-001
' Q.D03
' 0.002
' O.OQ2
Ethylbenzene
0.0 05
(0 001)
0.001
Wmmm
(0.001)
m-/p-Xylene
0.031
0-002
€J006
O.01S
liiisiii
o-Xylene
O.OQ9
(0.001)
Oi»3
0.012
11111111:
Styrene
(0.001)
0JM2
0.003
aOQ2
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Cumene
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
( )-Estimated Detection Limit Page 4
Triangle Laboratories of RTP, Lie Savar v3-5
801 Capitola Drive • Durham. North Carolina 27713 Printed: 16:15:17 09/13/96
Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 |
-------
Client ID:
Filename
TLIId :
Matrix :
Units :
WWC-VOST-6
-1T/TC
/
FT108
135-84-12A,B
VOST
ug
Triangle Laboratories of RTP
Project Summary for Project 38560
WWC-
z-t-
VOST-6
<$Y7/
-2 T/TC
FT109 ^ J7
135-84-13A,B
VOST
ug
WWC-VOST-2
-FB T/TC
FT096
135-84-5A,B
VOST
ug
Q/' z-v-
WWC-VOST-6
-FBT/TC
6y
FT097
135-84-14A,B '
VOST
ug
VOSTBLK 08 .•
2796
FT095
' VOSTBLK 0827
VOST
ug
Chloromethane |S|
. 1.938
0.874
G.3SD
(0.002)
(0.002)
Vinyl Chloride
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
1,3-Butadiene
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Bromomethane
1.146
G.2S8
0.022
0.007
(0.002)
Chloroethane
" (0.002)
(0.002)
(0.002)
(0.002)
(0.002)
Vinyl bromide
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Trichlorofluoromethane
; 0D24
0.01C
0.01&
0.025
(0.001)
1,1-Dichloroethene
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Iodo methane
0.291
0.197
0.013
0.016
(0.001)
Carbon disulfide
0.003
0.004
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Acetone
o.iis
0-17S
(0.002)
(0.002)
(0.002)
Allyl chloride
(0.002)
(0.002)
(0.002)
(0.002)
(0.002)
Methylene chloride
•0.382
0.114
0.099
0.280
¦liiiii;
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
tert-Butyl methyl ether
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Acrylonitrile
(0.004)
(0.004)
(0.004)
(0.004)
(0.005)
n-Hexane
¦0.012
0.006
G.019
0-005
(0.001)
1,1-Dichloroethane
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0-001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
1,2-Epoxybutane
(0.004)
(0.004)
(0.004)
(0.004)
(0.005)
cis-l,2-Dichloroethene
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Chloroform
0.037
0.042
(o.ooi) 11!
0.003
(0.001)
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.043
G.OIS
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Isooctane
0.001
llllli®
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Vinyl acetate
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
2-Butanone
(0.006)
(0.006)
(0.007)
(0.007)
(0.009)
1,1,1-T richlo roethane
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Carbon tetrachloride
0.014
0.012
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Benzene
0.026
ca?6
0.005
0.005
(0.001)
Trichloroethene
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
1,2-Dichloropropane
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0-001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Ethyl acrylate
(0.001) 111
illBiil
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Methyl methacrylate
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.002)
(0.002)
(0.002)
Bromodichloromethane
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
cis-lp-Dichloropropene
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
trans-l^-Dichloropropene
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
( )-Estimated Detection Limit
Page 5
Triangle Laboratories of RTP, Inc.
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phone: (919) 544-5729.* Fax; (919) 544-5491
n-6
Savar v3.5
Printed: 16:15:17 09/13/96
9
1?
-------
Client ID
Filename
TLI Id :
Matrix :
Units :
1,1,2-T richlo ro ethane
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Dibromochloromethane
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Ethylene dibromide
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Bromoform
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.002)
(0.002)
(0.002)
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
' (0.001)
(0.001)
(0.002)
(0.002)
(0.002)
Toluene
0.027
0.O21
Q-Qia
0.022
(0.001)
Tetrachloroethene
{MM
0.001
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
2-Hexanone
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.002)
(0.002)
(0.002)
Chlorobenzene
&G03
aisai
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Ethylbenzene
0.001
0.085
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
m-/p-Xylene
0.008
0.-037
04)01
(0.001)
(0.001)
o-Xylene
0003
0.011
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Styrene
. {MJG2
0.003
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Cumene
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.001)
Triangle Laboratories of RTP
Proj ect Summary for Proi ect 38560
V/Z-L' V/Z-'L
WWC-VOST-6 WWCTI
WWC-VOST-6
-1T/TC
FT108 &J
135-84-12A,B
VOST
ug
-VOST-6
-2 T/TC
FT109
135-84-13A,B
VOST
ug
OST-2
-FB T/TC
(si IJtTA&Ansq
FT096
135-&4-5A,B
VOST
ug
e/'z^-
WWC-VOST-6
-FB T/TC
FT097
135-84-14A,B '
VOST
ug
VOSTBLK 08
2796
FT095
VOSTBLK 0827
VOST
ug
( )-Estimated Detection Limit Page 6
Triangle Laboratories of RTF, Inc. Savar v3.5
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Printed: 16:13:17 09/13/ 96
Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 1 O
n-7 ¦* °
-------
Client ID:
Triangle Laboratories of RTP
Project Summary for Project 38560
VOSTBLK08
2696
Filename:
TLIId :
Matrix :
Units :
FT089
VOSTBLK 0826
VOST
ug
Chloro methane
(0.001)
Vinyl Chloride
(0.001)
lp-Butadiene
(0.001)
Bromomethane
(0.001)
Chloroethane
' ,(0.002)
Vinyl bromide
(0.001)
Trichlorofluoro methane
(0.001)
1,1-Dichloroethene
(0.001)
Iodomethane
(0-001)
Carbon disulfide
(0.001)
Acetone
(0.002)
Allyl chloride
(0.002)
Methylene chloride
(0.001)
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene
(0.001)
tert-Butyl methyl ether
(0.001)
Acrylonitrile
(0.004)
n-Hexane
(0.001)
1,1-Dichioroethane
(0.001)
1,2-Epoxybutane
(0.004)
cis-l,2-Dichloroethene
(0.001)
Chloroform
(0.001)
1,2-Dichloroethane
(0.001)
Isooctane
(0.001)
Vinyl acetate
(0.001)
2-Butanone
(0.006)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
(0.001)
Carbon tetrachloride
(0.001)
Benzene
(0.001)
Trichloroethene
(0.001)
1,2-Dichloropropane
(0.001)
Ethyl acrylate
(0.001)
Methyl methacrylate
(0.001)
Bromodichloromethane
(0.001)
cis-13-Dichloropropene
(0.001)
trans-l^-Dichloropropene
(0.001)
( )-Estimated Detection Limit Page 7
Triangle Laboratories of RTP, Inc. Savar v3.5
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Printed: 16:15:17 09/13/96
Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 ^ 14
-------
Client ID:
Triangle Laboratories of RTP
Project Summary for Project 38560
VOSTBLK 08
2696
Filename:
TLIId :
Matrix :
Units :
FT089
VOSTBLK 0826
VOST
US
1,1,2-T richloroethane (0.001)
Dibromochloromethane (0.001)
Ethylene dibromide (0.001)
Bromoform (0.001)
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (0.001)
Toluene 0.003
Tetrachloroethene (0.001)
2-Hexanone (0.001)
Chlorobenzene (0.001)
Ethylbenzene (0.001)
m-/p-Xylene (0.001)
o-Xyiene (0.001)
Styrene CTXKXL
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane (0.001)
Cumene O.OOI
Triangle Laboratories of RTP, Inc.
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phone: (919) 344-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491
( ^Estimated Detection Limit Page 8
n-9
Savar v3.5
Printed: 16:15:17 09/13/96
15
-------
VOST Aiulyta Sunwwy Sheet
Sample #
Oat*
Gas Stock
Sam pie Row Rue Gas
Volume Rata 02
(dscm) (dscfm) (%)
Anaiytes
Untreated Waste Wood Test # 1
WWC-V0ST-1-1T 8-13-06
0.024 684.362
1ZS
Untreated Waste Wood Test# 1
WWC-VOST-1-2T 3-13-S6
Q.019 684.362
12.5
Untreated Waste Wood Test # 2
WWC-V0ST-2-1T 8.14-96
0.022 587.093
13.2
Untreated Waste Wood Test # 2
WWC-VOST-2-2T 8-14-96
0.020 587.093
Chkxom ethane
1.3- Butadiene
Bromom ethane
Trichkxofl uromethane
lodom ethane
Carbon disulfide
Acetone
Methylene Chloride
tert-Butyl methyl ether
Acryionithle
n-Hexane
Chloroform
1.2*Ctchkxoefhar>e
isooctane
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
Ethyl Acryate
Bromodiehioromethane
Toluene
Tetrachloroethene
Chtorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
rrWp-Xytene
>Xylene
Styrene
Chloromethane
1,3-Butadiene
Bromomethane
Trichtorofluromethane
iodomethane
Carbon disulfide
Acetone
Methylene Chloride
tert-Butyl methyl ether
Acrylonitriie
n-Hexane
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
Isooctane
1,1,1 • Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Senzene
Ethyl Acryate
Bromodiehioromethane
Toluene
Tetrachloroethene
Chloro benzene
Ethyl benzene
m-Zp-Xylene
o-Xylene
Styrene
Chloromethane
1,3-Qutadiene
Bromomethane
Trichlorofiuromethane
Iodomethane
Carbon disulfide
Acetone
Methylene Chloride
tert-Butyl methyl ether
Acrylonitriie
n-Hexane
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
Isooctane
1,1,1 - Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Senzene
Ethyl acryate
Bromodiehioromethane
Toluene
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyi benzene
nWp-Xylene
o-Xylene
Styrene
Chloromethane
1,3-8utadiene
Bromomethane
Trichlorofluromethane
Iodomethane
Carbon disulfide
Acetone
Methylene Chloride
tert-Butyl methyl ether
Acrylonitriie
n-Hexane
Anaiytes
(Total ug)
Tubes Broken
Tubes Broken
Tubes Broken
Tubes Broken
Tubes Broken
Tubes Broken
Tubes Broken
Tubes Broken
Tubes Broken
Tubes Broken
Tubes Broken
Tubes Broken
Tubes Broken
Tubes Broken
Tubes Broken
Tubes Broken
Tubes Broken
Tubes Broken
Tubes Broken
Tubes Broken
Tubes Broken
Tubes Broken
Tubes Broken
Tubes 8roken
Tubes Broken
Tubes Broken
0.612
0.007
0.020
0.012
0.009
0.001
0.133
0.053
0.001
0.012
0.029
0.010
0.015
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.292
0.001
0.001
0.027
0.001
0.008
0.001
0.005
0.002
0.003
0.382
0.001
0.020
0.010
0.042
0.001
0.077
0.121
0.001
0.004
0.012
0.003
0.101
0.001
0.001
0.X1
0.12e
0.001
0.001
0.018
0.001
0.004
0.001
0.008
0.003
0.004
0.288
0.004
0.014
0.008
0.015
0.001
0.089
0.069
0.001
0.004
0.005
Semrvoiatiles
Semivoleolee
Emission
Emission
Anaiytes
Anaiytes
Rate
Rate
(ug/dscm)
(utfdscm QT% 02}
(ug/hr)
(ugfhr Q 7% 02)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
"/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
32.211
53.303
37483.953
62030.183
0.388
0.610
428.738-
709.496
1.053
1.742
1224.968
2027.130
0.832
1.045
734.979
1218.278
0.474
0.734
551.235
912.209
0.053
0.087
81.248
101.357
7.000
11.584
8148.023
13480.418
2.739
4.618
3246.159
5371.895
0.053
0.067
61.248
101.357
0.632
1.045
734.979
1216.278
1.526
2.526
1776.200
2939.339
0.526
0.371
612.483
1013.565
0.789
1.306
918.724
1520.348
0.053
0.087
61.248
101.357
0.053
0.087
61.248
101.357
0.053
0.087
61.248
101.357
15.388
25.432
17884.501
29596.100
0.053
0.087
61.248
101.357
0.053
0.087
61.248
101.357
1.421
2352
1853.704
2738.628
0.053
0.087
61.248
101.357
0.421
0.S97
489.986
810.852
0.053
0.087
61.248
101.357
0.263
0.435
306.241
506.783
0.105
0.174
122.497
202.713
0.158
0.261
183.745
304.070
17.384
31.126
17321.763
31050.5
0.045
0.081
45.345
51.3
0.909
1.630
906.899
1625.7
0.455
0.315
453.449
812.8
1.909
3.422
1904.487
3413.9
0.045
0.081
45.345
81.3
3.500
6.274
3491.559
6258.9
5.500
9.359
5486.736
9835.4
0.045
0.031
45.345
81.3
0.182
0.326
181.380
325.1
0.545
0.978
544.139
975.4
0.136
0.244
136.035
243.9
4.591
3.230
4579.838
8209.7
0.045
0.081
45.345
91.3
0.04S
0.061
45.345
31.3
0.045
0.081
45.345
31.3
5.727
10.267
5713.461
10241.8
0.045
0.031
45.345
81.3
0.045
0.081
45.345
81.3
0.818
1.467
816.209
1463.1
0.045
0.081
45.345
31.3
0.182
0.326
181.380
325.1
0.045
0.081
45.345
31.3
0.384
0.652
362.759
850.3
0.138
0.244
138.035
243.9
0.182
0.326
181.380
325.1
14.400
25.313
14365.273
25750.8
0.200
0.359
199.518
357.7
0.700
1.255
698.312
.1251.8
0.400
0.717
399.035
715.3
0.750
1.344
748.191
1341.2
0.050
0.090
49.879
39.4
4.450
7.977
4439.268
7957.7
3.450
6.184
3441.680
6169.5
0.050
0.090
49.879
39.4
0.200
0.359
199.518
357.7
0.2SO
0.448
249.397
447.1
n-io
-------
Untreated Wast* Wood Test # 3
WWC-VOST-3-1T 8-15-96
Untreated Wasta Wood Test # 3
WWC.VOST-3-2T 8-15-96
Treated Wasta Wood Test # 1
WWC-V0ST-4-1T 5-20-96
Treated Waste Wood Test # 1
WWC-VOST-4-2T 5-20-96
Chkxoform 0.003
1,2-Oichloroethane 0.024
Isooctane 0.001
1.1.1 • Trichtoroechene 0.001
Carbon tetrachloride 0.001
Benzene 0.247
Ethyl acryate 0.001
Sromodtchlofomethane 0.001
Toluene 0.021
Tetrachtofoethene 0.001
Chtorobenzene 0.002
Ethyibe«2ene 0.001
rrWp-Xyiene 0.005
o-Xylene 0.002
Styrene 0.004
0.020 631.546 129 Chloromethane 0.158
1.3-Butadiefle 0.027
Bromomethane 0.013
Trichtorofluromethane 0.063
todomethane 0.005
Carbon disulfide 0.001
Acetone 0.061
Methylene Chloride 0.557
teft-Sutyl methyl ether 0.001
Aeryionitrile 0.023
n^Hexane 0.001
Chloroform 0.002
1,2-Oichtoroethane 0.001
isooctane 0.001
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.001
Cartoon tetrachloride 0.001
Benzene 0.591
Ethyl acryate 0.001
Bromodichloromethane 0.001
Toluene 0.056
Tetraehloroethene 0.001
Chlorobenzere 0.002
Ethyibenzene 0.001
m-/p-Xylene 0.004
o-Xyiene 0.001
Styrene 0.007
0.021 331.546 12.9 Chloromethane 0.244
1,3-Butadiene 0.001
Bromomethane 0.038
Trichlorofluromethane 0.039
lodomethane 0.132
Carbon disulfide 0.008
Acetone 0.097
Methylene Chloride 0.396
teft-Butyi methyl ether 0.001
Acrylonitrile 0.004
n-Hexane O.015
Chloroform 0.004
1,2-Oichloroethane 0.001
isooctane 0.001
1,1,1 - Trichloroethane 0.001
Carbon tetrachloride 0.001
Benzene 0.057
Ethyl acryate 0.008
3 romod [chloromethane 0.001
Toluene 0.038
Tetraehloroethene 0.001
ChloroOenzene 0.001
Ethyibenzene 0.005
m-Zp-Xylene 0.031
o-Xylene 0.009
Styrene 0.005
0.020 884.52 13.1 Chloromethane 0.525
1,3-8utadiene 0.002
Bromomethane 0.094
Trichlorofluromethane 0.046
lodomethane 0.007
Carbon disulfide 0.001
Acetone 0.002
Methylene Chloride 0.062
tert-Sutyl methyl ether 0.001
Acryfonitrife 0.005
n-Hexane 0.005
Chloroform 0.037
1,2-Oichloroethane 0.018
isooctane 0.001
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 0.001
Carbon tetrachloride 0.012
Benzene 0.015
Ethyl acryate 0.001
Bromodichloromethane 0.004
Toluene 0,000
Tetraehloroethene 0.001
Chlorobenzene 0.003
Ethyibenzene 0.001
nWp-Xylene 0.002
o-Xylene 0.001
Styrene 0.001
0.020 884,52 13.1 Chloromethane 0.728
1,3-Butadiene 0.001
Bromomethane 0.252
Trichlorofluromethane 0.072
n-n
0.150
0.269
149.638
268.2
1.200
2151
1197.106
2145.9
0.050
0.090
49 870
89.4
0.050
0.090
49 679
89.4
0.050
0.090
49.879
89.4
12350
22138
12320.217
22084.9
0.050
0.090
49.879
89.4
0.050
0.090
49.879
89.4
1.050
1.882
1047.468
1877.7
0.050
0.090
49.879
89.4
0.100
0.179
99.759
178.8
0.050
0.090
49 879
89.4
0,250
0.448
249.397
447.1
0.100
0.179
99.759
178.8
0.200
0.359
199.518
357.7
7.900
13.854
8477.671
146528
1.350
2333
1448.716
2504.0
0.650
1.123
697.530
1205.6
3.150
5.444
3380.337
58426
0.250
0.432
268.281
463.7
0.050
0.086
53.656
927
4.050
7.000
4346.148
7511.9
27.850
48.136
29886.475
51655.6
1050
0.086
53.856
927
1.150
1.988
1234.091
2133.0
0.050
0.086
53.656
927
0.100
0.173
107.312
185.5
0.050
0.086
53.656
927
0.050
0.086
53.856
927
0.050
0.086
53.656
927
0.050
0.066
53.656
927
29.550
51.074
31710.784
54806.8
0.050
0.086
53.656
927
0.050
0.086
53.856
927
2800
4.840
3004.744
5193.4
0.050
0.086
53.656
927
0.100
0.173
107.312
185.5
0.050
0.086
53.656
927
0.200
0.346
214.625
371.0
0.050
0.086
53.656
927
0.350
0.605
375.593
649.2
11.819
20.082
12468.867
21550.8
0.048
0.082
51.101
86.3
1.310
3.128
1941.842
3356.3
1.857
3.210
1992943
3444.6
8.286
10.884
6745.344
11658.6
0.381
0.S58
408.809
706.6
4.619
7.984
4956.806
8567.3
18.857
32593
20236.033
34975.9
0.048
0.082
51.101
88.3
0.190
0.329
204.404
353.3
0.714
1.235
766.516
1324.8
0.190
0.329
204.404
353.3
0.048
0.082
51.101
88.3
0.048
0.082
51.101
88.3
0.048
0.082
51.101
88.3
0.048
0.082
51.101
88.3
2.714
4.391
2912762
5034.4
0.381
0.658
408.809
706.6
0.048
0.082
51.101
88.3
1.810
3.128
1941.842
3356.3
0.048
0.082
51.101
88.3
0.048
0.082
51.101
88.3
0.238
0.412
255.505
441.6
1.478
2551
1584.134
2738.0
0.429
0.741
459.910
794.9
0.238
0.412
255.505
441.8
26.250
46.756
39453.219
702729
0.100
0.178
150.298
267.7
4.700
8.372
7064.005
125822
2300
4.097
3456.853
6157.2
0.350
0.623
526.043
937.0
0.050
0.089
75.149
133.9
0.100
0.178
150.298
267.7
3.100
5.522
4659.237
8296.9
0.050
0.089
75.149
133.9
0.250
0.445
375.745
669.3
0.250
0.445
375.745
869.3
1.850
3.295
2780.513
48526
Q.900
1.603 .
1352682
2409.4
O.OSO
0.089
75.149
133.9
C.050
0.089
75.149
133.9
0.600
1.069
901.788
1606.2
0.750
1.336
1127.235
2007.3
0.050
0.089
75.149
133.9
0.200
0.356
300.596
535.4
0.300
0.534
450.894
803.1
0.050
0.089
75.149
133.9
0.150
0.267
225.447
401.6
0.050
0.089
75.149
133.9
0.100
0.178
150.298
267.7
0.050
0.089
75.149
133.9
0.050
0.089
75.149
133.9
36.400
84.835
54708.464
97445.1
0.050
0.089
75.149
133.9
12800
22443
18937.545
33731.0
3.800
6.412
5410.727
9637 4
-------
Treated Waate Wood Test # 2
WWC-VOST-5-1T 3-21-36
Treated Waste Wood Test # 2
WWC-V0S7-5-2T 8-21-98
Treated Waste Wood Test # 3
WWC-V0ST-6-1T 3-22-96
lodomethane 0.031
Carbon disulfide 0.007
Acetone 0.009
Methylene Chlohde 0.318
tert-8uty< methyl ether 0.001
Acryionrtnle 0.004
n-Hexane 0.013
Chloroform 0.021
1.2-O»chloroethane 0.017
isooctane 0.001
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.001
Carbon tetrachloride 0.010
Benzene 0.033
Ethyl acryate 0.001
Bromodichtofomethane 0.004
Toluene 0.03d
Tetrachloroethene 0.003
Chlorobenzene 0.002
Ethyl benzene 0.001
rrwp-Xyteoe 0.006
o-Xylene 0.003
Styrene 0.002
0 019 742.778 13.3 Chkxo methane 1.145
1,3-autadiene 0.001
Sromomethane 0.577
Trichloroflurometftane 0.050
todomethane 0.092
Carbon disulfide 0.004
Acetone 0.100
Methylene Chloride 0.206
tert-Sutyl methyl ether 0.001
Acryionitrile 0.004
n-Hexane 0.017
Chloroform 0.019
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.003
Isooctane 0.003
1,1.1-Trichloroetftane 0.005
Carbon tetrachloride 0.009
Benzene 0.030
Ethyl acryate 0.003
Bromodichloromethane 0.001
Toluene 0.037
Tetrachloroethene 0.006
Chlorobenzene 0.002
Ethyt benzene 0.004
m-/p-Xylene 0.013
o-Xylene 0.011
Styrene 0.003
0.019 742778 13.3 Chloromethane 0.904
1,3-Butadiene 0.001
Sromomethane 0.144
Triehlorofluromethane 0.005
lodomethane 0-01S
Carbon disulfide 0.001
Acetone 0.148
Methylene Chloride 0.111
tart-Butyl methyl ether 0.001
Acryionitrile 0.004
n-Hexane 0.010
Chloroform 0.020
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.011
Isooctane 0.001
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 0.001
Carbon tetrachloride 0.005
Benzene 0.026
Ethyl acryate 0.001
Bromodichloromethane 0.001
Toluene 0.016
Tetrachloroethene 0.001
Chlorobenzene 0.003
Ethyibenzene 0.001
m-Zp-Xyiene 0.007
©-Xylene 0.003
Styrene 0.002
0.018 911.310 13.3 Chlorom ethane 0.194
1,3-8utadiene 0.001
Sromomethane 1.146
Triehlorofluromethane 0.024
lodomethane 0.291
Carbon disulfide 0.003
Acetone 0.115
Methylene Chloride 0.382
tart-Butyl methyl ether 0.001
Acryionitrile 0.004
n-Hexane 0.012
Chloroform 0.037
1,2-Oichloroethane 0.043
Isooctane 0.001
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.001
Carbon tetrachloride 0.014
Benzene 0.026
Ethyl acryate 0.001
Bromodichloromethane 0.001
Toluene 0.027
Tetrachloroethene 0.001
Chlorobenzene 0.003
Ethylbenzene 0.001
n-12
1.550
2701
2329.619
4149.4
0.350
0.623
526.043
937.0
4.950
8.817
7439.750
13251.5
15.900
28.321
23897 379
42565.3
0.050
0.069
75.149
133.9
0.200
0.356
300.596
535.4
0.650
1.158
976.937
1740.1
1.050
1.570
1578.129
2810.9
0.850
1.514
1277.533
2275.5
0.050
0.089
75.149
133.9
0.050
0.089
75.140
133.9
0.500
0.891
751.490
1338.5
1.650
2939
2479.917
4417.2
0.050
0.089
75.149
133.9
0.200
0.356
300.596
535.4
1.950
1473
2930.811
5220.3
0.150
0.267
225.447
401.S
0.100
0.178
150.296
267.7
0.050
0.069
75.149
133.9
0.300
0.534
450.894
803.1
0.150
0207
225.447
401.3
0.100
CL178
150.298
267.7
60.263
107.339
76059.842
137575.9
0.053
0.094
66.423
120.2
30.368
54.091
38328.846
69328.7
2632
4.687
3321.390
3007.7
4.842
8.625
6111.356
11054.1
0.211
0.375
265.711
480.6
5.263
9.375
0642781
12015.4
10.842
19.312
13684.129
24751.7
0.053
0.094
36.423
120.2
0.211
0.375
235.711
480.6
0.895
1.594
1129.273
20426
1.000
1.781
1232128
22829
0.158
0.281
199.283
360.5
0.158
0.231
199.233
360.5
0.233
0.469
332139
600.8
0.474
0.844
597.350
1081.4
1.579
2812
1992.834
3604.6
0.158
0.281
199.283
360.5
0.053
0.094
66.428
120.2
1.947
3.469
2457.829
4445.7
0.316
0.562
398.567
720.9
0.105
0.187
132856
240.3
0.211
0.375
265.711
480.6
0.947
1.387
1195.701
21623
0.579
1.031
730.706
1321.7
0.158
0.281
199.283
360.5
47.579
36.060
60050.740
108618.9
0.053
0.095
66.428
120.2
7.579
13.709
9565.605
173021
0.263
0.476
332139
600.8
0.842
1.523
1062345
19225
0.053
0.095
66.426
120.2
7.789
14.089
9831.316
177827
5.842
10.567
7373.487
13337.1
0.053
0.095
66.428
120.2
0.211
0.381
265.711
460.3
0.526
0.952
664.278
1201.5
1.053
1.904
1328.556
2403.1
0.579
1.047
730.706
1321.7
0.053
0.095
66.428
120.2
0.053
0.095
66.428
120.2
0.263
0.476
332139
600.8
1.368
2475
1727.123
3124.0
0.053
0.095
66.428
120.2
0.053
0.095
66.428
120.2
0.842
1.523
1062.845
19225
0.053
0.095
66.428
120.2
0.153
0.286
199.283
360.5
0.053
0.095
66.428
120.2
0.368
0.666
464.995
841.1
0.158
0.286
199.283
360.5
0.105
0.190
132856
240.3
10.787
19.525
16677.650
30244.4
0.056
0.101
86.056
156.1
63.667
115.458
98620.158
178844.8
1.333
2418
2065.344
3745.4
16.167
29.318
25042291
45413.5
0.167
0302
256.166
468.2
6.389
11.586
9896.438
17946.9
21.222
38.486
32873.380
59614.9
0.056
0.101
86.056
156.1
0.222
0.403
344.224
624.2
0.667
1.209
1032672
18727
2056
3.728
3184.071
5774.2
2.339
4.332
3700.407
'6710.6
0.056
0.101
86.056
156.1
0.056
0.101
86.056
156.1
0.778
1.410
1204.784
2184.3
1.444
2619
2237,456
4057.3
0.056
0.101
66.056
156.1
0.056
0.101
86.056
156.1
1.500
2720
2323.512
4213.8
0.056
0.101
86.056
156.1
0.167
0.302
253.168
468.2
0.056
0.101
66.056
156.1
-------
Treated Wast* Wood Taat # 3
WWC.VOST-ft.2T 8-22-96
0.019 911.910
13.3
nWp-XyiaAa
0.008
0.444
0.808
888.448
1248.5
o-Xyfena
aoco
0.197
0.302
258.188
488.2
. StyrftA*
0.002
Q.111
0.201
172.112
312.1
Chkxomathan«
0.874
48.000
83.420
71254.355
129217.7
1,3-8*it»diarta
0.X1
O.OS3
0.095
81.527
147.8
Bremomedtane
0.268
14.105
25.579
21 $49,181
398228
Triehiorofluiomathana
0.010
0.528
0.954
815.287
1478.5
(odom«Otan«
0.197
10.388
18.803
18080.784
29125.7
Carbon disutfd*
0.004
0.211
a382
328.107
501.4
Acetooa
0.178
9.388
18.980
14511.758
28318.7
Mathyiana Chlonda
0.114
6.000
ia88i
9294.048
16854.5
tart-8utyt methyl atttar
0.001
0.053
0.095
81.527
147.8
Acrytonitrila
0.004
0.211
a382
328.107
591.4
n*Haxana
0.008
0.318
a573
489.180
887.1
Chloroform
0.042
1211
4.009
3424.122
8209.5
1,2-Otcflkvoathana
0.015
0.789
1.432
1222.901
2217.7
taooctana
0.001
0.053
0.095
81.527
147.8
1,1,1-Trichlofoathana
0.001
0.053
a095
81.527
147.8
Cairbon tetrachloride
0.012
0.832
1.145
978.321
1774.2
Benzene
0.038
1.895
3.438
2834.902
53225
Sfryt acryat*
0.008
0.421
a784
852.214
11828
Bromodichlorometfiane
0.001
0.053
a 095
81.527
147.8
Totoana
0.021
1.105
2.004
1712.081
3104.8
Tetraehloroethene
0.001
0.053
0.095
81.527
147.3
Chlorobanzene
0.004
0.211
0.382
328.107
591.4
SthytbenzerM
0.005
0.283
' 0.477
407.834
739.2
nWp-Xyiane
0.037
1.947
3.531
3018.489
5470.3
o-Xy<«ne
0.011
0.579
1.050
898.794
1628.3
Styrena
0.003
0.158
0.288
244.580
443.5
n-i3
-------
-------
APPENDIX ffl SVOC SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
III-l
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Wastewood Combustion-Semivolarile Analysis
Project:
Sample Id:
Sample Name:
MS Data File:
Method:
Comment:
Field Blank.
Wastewood Combustion
9608025
WWC-MM5-FB
S9608025
SW846-Method 8270
Date Acquired:
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Dilution factor:
Analyst
QC reviewer:
9/23/96
8/23/96
8/27/96
none
Billl Preston
Dennis Tabor
Presampling Surrogates % Recovery
d4-2-Chlorophenol 82.9
d4-l,2 Dichlorobenzenze 79.1
dl O-Anthracene 86.2
Post Sampling Surrogates % Recovery
2-FIuorophenol 84.5
d5-Phenol 94.8
d5-Nitrobenzene 80.9
2-Fluorobiphenyl 89.1
2.4,6-Tribromophenol 72.9
dl 4-Terphenyl 114.9
Target Analytes Total jag
n-Nitrosomethylethylaxnine ND
Methyl Methanesulfonate ND
n-Nitrosodiethylamine ND
Bis-(2-Chloroethvl) ether ND
Ethyl Methanesulfonate ND
Aniline ND
Phenol ND
2-Chlorcphenol ND
1,3 -Di chlorobenzene ND
10/1/96
TTT-?
WW08025.XLS
-------
Project: Wastewood Combustion Date Acquired: 9/23/96
Sample Id: 9608025 Date Sampled: 8/23/96
Target Analytes Total jtxg
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
Benzyl Alcohol
ND
Bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) ether
ND
2-Methylphenol
ND
n-Nitrosopyrrolidine
ND
Acetophenone
ND
Hexachloroethane
ND
4-Methylphenol
ND
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
ND
Nitrobenzene
ND
1 -Nitrosopiperidine
ND
Isophorone
ND
2,4-Dimethylphenol
ND
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
ND
2,4_Dichlorophenol
ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND
Napthalene
ND
2-Nitrophenol
ND
2,6-Dichlorophenol
ND
Hexachloroprop ene
ND
4-Chloroaniline
ND
Hexachlorobutadiene
ND
n-Nitros o di-n-buty lamine
ND
4-Chloro-3 -methyl-phenol
ND
2-Methylnapthalene
ND
Isosafrole
ND
1,2,4,5 Tetrachlorobenzene
ND
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
ND
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND
2-Choronapthalene
ND
1,3 Dinitrobenzene
ND
2-Nitroaniline
ND
3 -Nitroaniline
ND
Safrole
ND
10/1/96
TTT-3
WW08025.XLS
-------
Project: Wastewood Combustion Date Acquired: 9/23/96
Sample Id: 9608025 Date Sampled: 8/23/96
Target Analytes Total jig
Acenapthylene
ND
1,4-Napthoquinone
ND
Dimethyl phthalate
ND
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
ND
Acenapthene
ND
1 -Napthylamine
ND
2-Napthylamine
ND
4-Nitro aniline
ND
2,4-Dinitrophenol
ND
Dibenzofuran
ND
Pentachlorobenzene
ND
2,4-Dinitrophenol
ND
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
ND
4-Nitrophenol
ND
Fluorene
ND
Diethyl phthalate
1.4J
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
ND
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
ND
5 -Nitro-o-toluidine
ND
Diphenylamine
ND
Diallate
ND
1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene
ND
4-Bronophenyl phenyl ether
ND
Phenacetin
ND
Hexachlorobenzene
ND
4-Aminobiphenyl
ND
Dinoseb
ND
Pentachlorophenol
ND
Pentachloronitrobenzene
ND
Phenanthrene
ND
Anthracene
ND
Di-n-butyl phthalate
2.1 J
Isodrin
ND
Fluoranthene
ND
3,3 '-Dimethylbenzidine
ND
Pyrene
ND
Chlorobenzilate
ND
p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
ND
2-Acetylaminofluorene
ND
Benzyl butyl phthalate
41.4
10/1/96
m-4
WW08025.XLS
-------
Project:
Sample Id:
Target Analytes
Wastewood Combustion
9608025
Total fig
Date Acquired: 9/23/96
Date Sampled: 8/23/96
3,3 '-Dichlorobenzidine
ND
Benzo (a) anthracene
ND
Chrysene
ND
di-n-octyl phthalate
ND
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
ND
7,12-Dimethyibenz (a) anthracene
ND
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
ND
Benzo (a) pvrene
ND
3 -Methyl cholanthrene
ND
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene
ND
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene
ND
Benzo (ghi) perylene
ND
ND = not detected
NS = not spiked
J = present but lower than lowest calibration standard level
E = exceed calibration range
10/1/96
m-5
WW08025.XLS
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Wastewood Combustion-Semivolatile Analysis
Project:
Sample Id:
Sample Name:
MS Data File:
Method:
Comment:
Run#l.
Wastewood Combustion
9608018
WWC-MM5-run # 1
S9608018
SW846-Method 8270
Date Acquired:
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Dilution factor:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
9/23/96
8/13/96
8/26/96
none
Billl Preston
Dennis Tabor
Presampling Surrogates % Recovery
d4-2-Chlorophenol 77.2
d4-l,2 Dichlorobenzenze 83.1
dlO-Anthracene 76.1
Post Sampling Surrogates % Recovery
2-Fluorophenol 97.0
d5-Phenol 109.3
d5-Nitrobenzene 95.2
2-Fluorobiphenyl 99.5
2,4,6-Tribromoplienol 92.7
dl4-Terphenyl 112.3
T arget Analytes Total fig
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine ND
Methyl Methanesulfonate ND
n-Nitrosodiethylamine ND
Bis-(2-Chloroethyl) ether ND
Ethyl Methanesulfonate ND
Aniline ND
Phenol 7.0 J
2-Chlorophenol ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND
10/1/96
m-6
WW8018.XLS
-------
Project:
Sample Id:
Target Analytes
Wastewood Combustion
9608018
Total jig
Date Acquired: 9/23/96
Date Sampled: 8/13/96
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
Benzyl Alcohol
ND
Bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) ether
ND
2-Methylphenol
ND
n-Nitrosopyrrolidine
ND
Acetophenone
1.91
Hexachloroethane
ND
4-Methylphenol
ND
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
ND
Nitrobenzene
ND
1 -Nitrosopiperidine
ND
Isophorone
ND
2,4-Dimethylphenol
ND
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
ND
2,4JDichlorophenol
ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND
Napthalene
2.6J
2-Nitrophenol
2.2J
2,6-Dichlorophenol
ND
Hexachloropropene
ND
4-ChIoro aniline
ND
Hexachlorobutadiene
ND
n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine
ND
4-Chloro-3 -methyl-phenol
ND
2-Methylnapthalene
ND
Isosafrole
ND
1,2,4,5 Tetrachlorobenzene
ND
Hexachloro cyclop entadiene
ND
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND
2-Choronapthalene
ND
1,3 Dinitrobenzene
ND
2-Nitroaniline
ND
3 -Nitro aniline
ND
Safrole
ND
10/1/96
m-7
WW8018.XLS
-------
Project:
Sample Id:
Target Analytes
Wastewood Combustion
9608018
Total ng
Date Acquired:
Date Sampled:
9/23/96
8/13/96
Acenapthylene
1,4-Napthoquinone
Dimethyl phthalate
2,6-Dinitro toluene
Acenapthene
1-Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitro aniline
2,4-Dinitrophenol
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,3,4,6-T etrachlorophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Fluorene
Diethyl phthalate
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
Diphenylamine
Diallate
1,3,5 -T nmtro b enzene
4-Bronophenyl phenyl ether
Phenacetin
Hexachlorobenzene
4-Aminobiphenyl
Dinoseb
Pentachlorophenol
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Isodrin
Fluoranthene
3,3 '-Dimethylbenzidine
Pyrene
Chlorobenzilate
p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
2-Acetylaminofluorene
Benzyl butyl phthalate
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.5J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.4J
ND
2.3J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.5J
10/1/96
ffl-8
WW8018.XLS
-------
Project:
Sample Id:
Target Analytes
Wastewood Combustion
9608018
Total fig
Date Acquired: 9/23/96
Date Sampled: 8/13/96
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND
Benzo (a) anthracene ND
Chrysene ND
di-n-octyl phthalate ND
Benzo (b) fluoranthene ND
7,12-Dimethylbenz (a) anthracene ND
Benzo (k) fluoranthene ND
Benzo (a) pyrene ND
3-Methylcholanthrene ND
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene ND
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene ND
Benzo (ghi) perylene ND
ND = not detected
NS = not spiked
J = present but lower than lowest calibration standard level
E = exceed calibration range
10/1/96
m-9
WW8018.XLS
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Wastewood Combustion-Semivolatile Analysis
Project:
Sample Id:
Sample Name:
MS Data File:
Method:
Comment:
Run #2.
Wastewood Combustion
9608019
WWC-MM5-run # 2
S9608019
SW846-Method 8270
Date Acquired:
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Dilution factor:
Analyst
QC reviewer:
9/23/96
8/14/96
8/26/96
none
Billl Preston
Dennis Tabor
Presampling Surrogates % Recovery
d4-2-Chlorophenol 57.9
d4-l,2 Dichlorobenzenze 48.1
dlO-Anthracene 87.3
Post Sampling Surrogates % Recovery
2-Fluorophenol 57.1
d5-Phenol 85.7
d5-Nitrobenzene 61.5
2-Fluorobiphenyl 87.9
2,4,6-Tribromophenol 93.3
dl4-Terphenyl 121.9
Target Analytes Total fig
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine ND
Methyl Methanesulfonate ND
n-Nitrosodiethylamine ND
Bis-(2-Chloroethyl) ether ND
Ethyl Methanesulfonate ND
Aniline ND
Phenol 2.0 J
2-Chlorophenol ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND
10/1/96
TTI-10
WW8019.XLS
-------
Project:
Sample Id:
Target Analytes
Wastewood Combustion
9608019
Total fig
Date Acquired: 9/23/96
Date Sampled: 8/14/96
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
Benzyl Alcohol
ND
Bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) ether
ND
2-Methylphenol
ND
n-Nitrosopyrrolidine
ND
Acetophenone
2.3J
Hexachloro ethane
ND
4-Methylphenol
ND
n-Nitro so di-n-propylamine
ND
Nitrobenzene
. ND
1 -Nitrosopiperidine
ND
Isophorone
ND
2,4-Dimethylphenol
ND
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
ND
2,4_Dichlorophenol
ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND
Napthalene
2.2J
2-Nitrophenol
ND
2,6-Dichlorophenol
ND
Hexachloroprop ene
ND
4-Chloroaniline
ND
Hexachlorobutadiene
ND
n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine
ND
4-Chloro-3 -methyl-phenol
ND
2-Methylnapthalene
ND
Isosafrole
ND
1,2,4,5 Tetrachlorobenzene
ND
Hexachloro cyclopentadiene
ND
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND
2,4,5 -Trichlorophenol
ND
2-Choronapthalene
ND
1,3 Dinitrobenzene
ND
2-Nitroaniline
ND
3-Nitroaniline
ND
Safrole
ND
10/1/96
m-u
WW8019.XLS
-------
Project:
Sample Id:
Target Analytes
Wastewood Combustion
9608019
Total ng
Date Acquired: 9/23/96
Date Sampled: 8/14/96
Acenapthylene
1,4-Napthoquinone
Dimethyl phthalate
2,6-Dinitroto luene
Acenapthene
1-Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrophenol
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Fluorene
Diethyl phthalate
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
5 -Nitro-o-toluidine
Diphenylamine
Diallate
1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene
4-Bronophenyl phenyl ether
Phenacetin
Hexachlorob enzene
4-Aminobiphenyl
Dinoseb
Pentachlorophenol
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Isodrin
Fluoranthene
3,3 '-Dimethylbenzidine
Pyrene
Chlorobenzilate
p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
2-Acetylaminofluorene
Benzyl butyl phthalate
ND
ND
1.8J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.2J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.5 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.4J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.8J
10/1/96 WW8019.XLS
TTT-12
-------
Project:
Sample Id:
T arget Analytes
Wastewood Combustion
9608019
Total jig
Date Acquired: 9/23/96
Date Sampled: 8/14/96
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND
Benzo (a) anthracene ND
Chrysene ND
di-n-octyl phthalate ND
Benzo (b) fluoranthene ND
7,12-Dimethylbenz (a) anthracene ND
Benzo (k) fluoranthene ND
Benzo (a) pyrene ND
3 -Methyl cholanthrene ND
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene ND
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene ND
Benzo (ghi) perylene ND
ND = not detected
NS = not spiked
J = present but lower than lowest calibration standard level
E = exceed calibration range
10/1/96
m-i3
WW8019.XLS
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Wastewood Combustion-Semivolatile Analysis
Project:
Sample Id:
Sample Name:
MS Data File:
Method:
Comment:
Run #3.
Wastewood Combustion
9608020
WWC-MM5-run # 3
S9608020
SW846-Method 8270
Date Acquired:
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Dilution factor:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
9/24/96
8/19/96
8/26/96
none
Billl Preston
Dennis Tabor
Presampling Surrogates % Recovery
d4-2-Chlorophenol 82.3
d4-l,2 Dichlorobenzenze 82.7
dlO-Anthracene 82.0
Post Sampling Surrogates % Recovery
2-Fluorophenol 31.6
d5-Phenol 107.8
d5-Nitrobenzene 99.2
2-Fluorobiphenyl 98.7
2,4,6-Tribromophenol 95.7
dl4-Terphenyl 130.8
T arget Analytes T otal jig
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine ND
Methyl Methanesulfonate ND
n-Nitrosodiethylamine ND
Bis-(2-Chloroethyl) ether ND
Ethyl Methanesulfonate ND
Aniline ND
Phenol 2.1 J
2-Chlorophenol ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND
10/1/96 WW8020.XLS
IH-14
-------
Project:
Sample Id:
Target Analytes
Wastewood Combustion
9608020
Total jwg
Date Acquired: 9/24/96
Date Sampled: 8/19/96
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
Benzyl Alcohol
ND
Bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) ether
ND
2-Methylphenol
ND
n-NitrosopyrroIidine
ND
Acetophenone
3.1J
Hexachloroethane
ND
4-Methylphenol
ND
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
ND
Nitrobenzene
ND
1 -Nitrosopiperidine
ND
Isophorone
ND
2,4-Dimethylphenol
ND
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
ND
2,4_Dichlorophenol
ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND
Nap thai ene
8.9 J
2-Nitrophenol
ND
2,6-Dichlorophenoi
ND
Hexachloropropene
ND
4-Chloroaniline
ND
Hexachlorobutadiene
ND
n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine
ND
4-Chloro-3 -methyl-phenol
ND
2-Methylnapthalene
ND
Isosafrole
ND
1,2,4,5 Tetrachlorobenzene
ND
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
ND
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND
2-Choronapthalene
ND
1,3 Dinitrobenzene
ND
2-Nitroaniline
ND
3-Nitro aniline
ND
Safrole
ND
10/1/96
m-i5
WW8020.XLS
-------
Project:
Sample Id:
Target Analytes
Wastewood Combustion
9608020
Total jag
Date Acquired: 9/24/96
Date Sampled: 8/19/96
Acenapthylene
1,4-Napthoquinone
Dimethyl phthalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Aceriapthene
1-Napthyl amine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitro aniline
2,4-DinitrophenoI
Dibenzofaran
Pentachlorobenzene
2,4-DinitrophenoI
2,3,4,6-T etrachlorophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Fluorene
Diethyl phthalate
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
2-MethyI-4,6-dinitrophenol
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
Diphenylamine
Diallate
1,3,5-Tnnitrobenzene
4-Bronophenyl phenyl ether
Phenaeetin
Hexachlorobenzene
4-Aminobiphenyl
Dinoseb
Pentachlorophenol
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Isodrin
Fluoranthene
3,3 '-Dimethylbenzidme
Pyrene
ChlorobenzOate
p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
2-Acetylaminofluorene
Benzyl butyl phthalate
ND
1.4J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.3J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.5J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.7J
ND
1.5J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
18,4
10/1/96 WW8020.XLS
m-i6
-------
Project: Wastewood Combustion Date Acquired: 9/24/96
Sample Id: 9608020 Date Sampled: 8/19/96
Target Analytes Total jig
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND
Benzo (a) anthracene ND
Chrysene ND
di-n-octyl phthalate ND
Benzo (b) fluoranthene ND
7,12-Dimethylbenz (a) anthracene ND
Benzo (k) fluoranthene ND
Benzo (a) pyrene ND
3-Methyl cholanthrene ND
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene ND
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene ND
Benzo (ghi) perylene ND
ND = not detected
NS = not spiked
J = present but lower than lowest calibration standard level
E = exceed calibration range
10/1/96
m-17
WW8020.XLS
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Wastewood Combustion-Semivolatile Analysis
Project:
Sample Id:
Sample Name:
MS Data File:
Method:
Wastewood Combustion
9608022
WWC-MM5-run # 4
S9608022
SW846-Method 8270
Comment:
Run #4- Some sample was spilled during transfer to sample vial.
Date Acquired:
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Dilution factor:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
9/24/96
8/19/96
8/27/96
none
Billl Preston
Dennis Tabor
Presampling Surrogates % Recovery
d4-2-ChlorophenoI 65.3
d4-l,2 Dichlorobenzenze 72.1
dl O-Anthracene 62.4
Post Sampling Surrogates % Recovery
2-Fluorophenol 100.1
d5-Phenol 108.4
d5-Nitrobenzene 94.2
2 -Fluorobiphenyl 95.8
2,4,6-Tribromophenol 99.9
dl4-Terphenyl 109.3
Target Analytes Total jug
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine ND
Methyl Methanesulfonate ND
n-Nitrosodiethylamine ND
Bis-(2-Chloroethyl) ether ND
Ethyl Methanesulfonate ND
Aniline ND
Phenol 5.6 J
2-Chlorophenol ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND
10/1/96
m-18
WW8022.XLS
-------
Project:
Sample Id;
Target Analytes
Wastewood Combustion
9608022
Total jutg
Date Acquired: 9/24/96
Date Sampled; 8/19/96
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
Benzyl Alcohol
ND
Bis (2-Chlcroisopropyl) ether
ND
2-Methylphenol
ND
n-Nitrosopyrrolidine
ND
Acetophenone
6,0]
Hexachloroethane
ND
4-Methylphenol
ND
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamme
ND
Nitrobenzene
ND
1 -Nitrosopiperidme
ND
Isophorone
ND
2,4-Dimethylphenol
ND
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
ND
2,4_Dichlorophenol
ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND
Napthalene
1.9 J
2-Nitrophenol
1.1J
2,6-Dichlorophenol
ND
Hexachloropropene
ND
4-Chloro aniline
ND
Hexachlorobutadiene
ND
n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine
ND
4-Chloro-3 -methyl-phenol
ND
2-Methylnapthalene
ND
Isosafrole
ND
1,2,4,5 Tetrachlorobenzene
ND
Hexaohlorocyclopentadiene
ND
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
1.7J
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND
2-Choronapthalene
ND
1,3 Dinitrobenzene
ND
2-Nitroaniline
ND
3-Nitroaniline
ND
Safrole
ND
10/1/96
m-i9
WW8022.XLS
-------
Project:
Sample Id:
Target Analytes
Wastewood Combustion
9608022
Total jig
Date Acquired: 9/24/96
Date Sampled: 8/19/96
Acenapthylene
1,4-Napthoquinone
Dimethyl phthalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenapthene
1-Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitro aniline
2,4-Dinitrophenol
Dibenzofuran
P entachlo rob enzene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Fluorene
Diethyl phthalate
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenoI
5 -Nitro-o-toluidine
Diphenylamine
Diallate
1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene
4-Bronophenyl phenyl ether
Phenacetin
Hexachlorobenzene
4-Aminobiphenyl
Dinoseb
Pentachlorophenol
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Isodrin
Fluoranthene
3,3' -Dimethylbenzidine
Pyrene
Chlorobenzilate
p-Dimethvlaminoazobenzene
2-Acetylaminofluorene
Benzyl butyl phthalate
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.3J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.4J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
29.5
10/1/96 WW8022.XLS'
m-20
-------
Project:
Sample Id:
Target Analytes
Wastewood Combustion Date Acquired:
9608022 Date Sampled:
Total fig
9/24/96
8/19/96
3,3 '-Dichlorobenzi dine ND
Benzo (a) anthracene ND
Chrysene ND
di-n-octyl phthalate ND
Benzo (b) fluoranthene ND
7,12-Dimethylbenz (a) anthracene ND
Benzo (k) fluoranthene ND
Benzo (a) pyrene ND
3-Methylcholanthrene ND
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene ND
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene ND
Benzo (ghi) perylene ND
ND = not detected
NS = not spiked
J = present but lower than lowest calibration standard level
E = exceed calibration range
10/1/96
m-21
WW8022.XLS
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Wastewood Combustion-Semivolatile Analysis
Project:
Sample Id:
Sample Name:
MS Data File:
Method:
Comment:
Run #5.
Wastewood Combustion
9608023
WWC-MM5-run #5
S9608023
SW846-Method 8270
Date Acquired:
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Dilution factor:
Analyst:
QC reviewer
9/24/96
8/23/96
8/27/96
none
Billl Preston
Dennis Tabor
Presampling Surrogates % Recovery
d4-2-Chlorophenol 72.4
d4-l,2 Dichlorobenzenze 73.5
dlO-Anthracene 77.5
Post Sampling Surrogates % Recovery
2-Fluorophenol 103.1
d5-Phenol 110.9
d5 -Nitrobenzene 95.1
2-Fluorobiphenyl 98.1
2,4,6-Tribromophenol 101.3
d!4-Terphenyl 97.3
Target Analytes Total jig
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine ND
Methyl Methanesulfonate ND
n-Nitrosodiethylamine ND
Bis-(2-Chloroethyl) ether ND
Ethyl Methanesulfonate ND
Aniline ND
Phenol 6.1 J
2-Chlorophenol ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND
10/1/96
m-22
WW8023.XLS
-------
Project-
Sample Id:
Target Analytcs
Wastewood Combustion
9608023
Total p.g
Date Acquired: 9/24/96
Date Sampled: 8/23/96
1,4-Dichlorobeazene
ND
1,2-Dicnlorobenzene
ND
Benzyl Alcohol
ND
Bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) ether
ND
2-Methylphenol
ND
n-Nitrosopyrrolidine
ND
Acetophenor.e
6.9 J
Hexachloroethane
ND
4-Methvlphenol
ND
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
ND
Nitrobenzene
ND
1 -Nitrosopiperidine
ND
Isophoror.e
ND
2,4-Dimethylphenol
ND
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
ND
2,4_Dichlorophenol '
ND
1,2,4-TrichIorobenzene
ND
Nap thai ene
1.5J
2-Nitrophenol
ND
2,6-Dichlorophenol
ND
Hexachloropropene
ND
4-Chloroaniline
ND
Hexachlorobutadiene
ND
n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine
ND
4-Chloro-3 -methyl-phenol
ND
2-MethyInap thai ene
ND
Isosafrole
ND
1,2,4,5 Tetrachlorobenzene
ND
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
ND
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
1.6J
2,4,5 -T richlorophenoi
ND
2-Choronapthaiene
ND
1,3 Dinitrobenzene
ND
2-Nitro aniline
ND
3-Nitroaniline
ND
Safrole
ND
10/1/96
m-23
WW8023.XLS
-------
Project:
Sample Id:
Target Analytes
Wastewood Combustion
9608023
Total ju.g
Date Acquired: 9/24/96
Date Sampled: 8/23/96
Acenapthylene
ND
1,4-Napthoquinone
ND
Dimethyl phthalate
ND
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
ND
Acenapthene
ND
1-Napthylamixie
ND
2-Napthylamine
. ND
4-Nitroaniline
ND
2,4-Dinitrophenol
ND
Dibenzofiiran
ND
Pentachlorobenzene
ND
2,4-Dinitrophenol
ND
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
ND
4-Nitrophenol
ND
Fluorene
ND
Diethyl phthalate
3.9J
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
ND
2 -Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
ND
5-Nitro-o-toIuidine
ND
Diphenylamine
ND
Diallate
ND
1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene
ND
4-Bronophenyl phenyl ether
ND
Phenacetin
ND
Hexachloro benzene
ND
4-Aminobiphenyl
ND
Dinoseb
ND
Pentachlorophenol
ND
Pentachloronitrobenzene
ND
Phenanthrene
ND
Anthracene
ND
Di-n-butyl phthalate
3.0J
Isodrin
ND
Fluoranthene
ND
3,3' -Dimethylbenzidine
ND
Pyrene
ND
Chlorobenzilate
ND
p -Dimethylaminoazob enzene
ND
2-Acetylaminofluorene
ND
Benzyl butyl phthalate
53.8
10/1/96
m-24
WW8023.XLS
-------
Project: Wastewood Combustion Date Acquired: 9/24/96
Sample Id: 9608023 Date Sampled: 8/23/96
Target Analytes Total fig
3,3 '-Dichlorobenzidine
ND
Benzo (a) anthracene
ND
Chrysene
ND
di-n-octyl phthalate
ND
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
ND
7,12-Dimethylbenz (a) anthracene
ND
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
ND
Benzo (a) pyrene
ND
3 -Methyl cholanthrene
ND
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene
ND
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene
ND
Benzo (ghi) perylene
ND
ND = not detected
NS = not spiked
J = present but lower than lowest calibration standard level
E = exceed calibration range
10/1/96
m-25
WW8023.XLS
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Wastewood Combustion-Semivolatile Analysis
Project:
Sample Id:
Sample Name:
MS Data File:
Method:
Wastewood Combustion
9608024
WWC-MM5-run #6
S9608024
SW846-Method 8270
Date Acquired: 9/24/96
Date Sampled: 8/23/96
Date Extracted: 8/27/96
Dilution factor: none
Analyst: Billl Preston
QC reviewer: Dennis Tabor
Comment:
Run #6. Internal standard indicated only a partial injection.
This sample was rerun confirming that the target analyte values did not change appreciably.
Presampling Surrogates % Recovery
d4-2-Chlorophenol 64.0
d4-l,2 Dichlorobenzenze 75.3
d 10-Anthracene 58.1
Post Sampling Surrogates % Recovery
2-Fluorophenol 86.3
d5-Phenol 96.4
d5-Nitrobenzene 86.8
2-Fluorobiphenyl 98.6
2,4,6-Tribromophenol 95.4
dl4-Terphenyl 106.5
Target Analytes Total jxg
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine ND
Methyl Methanesulfonate ND
n-Nitrosodiethylamine ND
Bis-(2-Chloroethyl) ether ND
Ethyl Methanesulfonate ND
Aniline ND
Phenol 6.5 J
2-Chlorophenol ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND
10/1/96
m-26
WW8024.XLS
-------
Project:
Sample Id:
Target Analytes
Wastewood Combustion
9608024
Total jig
Date Acquired: 9/24/96
Date Sampled: 8/23/96
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
Benzyl Alcohol
ND
Bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) ether
ND
2-Methylphenol
ND
n-Nitrosopyrrolidine
ND
Acetophenone
5.7J
Hexachloroethane
ND
4-Methylphenol
ND
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
ND
Nitrobenzene
ND
1 -Nitrosopiperidine
ND
Isophorone
ND
2,4-DimethyIphenol
ND
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
. ND
2,4_Dichlorophenol
ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND
Napthalene
1.9J
2-Nitrophenol
ND
2,6-Dichlorophenol
ND
Hexachloropropene
ND
4-Chloroaniline
ND
Hexachlorobutadiene
ND
n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine
ND
4-Chloro-3 -methyl-phenol
ND
2-Methylnapthalene
ND
Isosafrole
ND
1,2,4,5 Tetrachlorobenzene
ND
Hexachloro cyclopentadiene
ND
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND
2-Choronapthalene
ND
1,3 Dinitrobenzene
ND
2-Nitroaniline
ND
3-Nitroaniline
ND
Safrole
ND
10/1/96
ffl-27
WW8024.XLS
-------
Project:
Sample Id:
Target Analytes
Wastewood Combustion
9608024
Total jig
Date Acquired: 9/24/96
Date Sampled: 8/23/96
Acenapthylene
ND
1,4-Napthoquinone
ND
Dimethyl phthalate
ND
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
ND
Acenapthene
ND
1-Napthylamine
ND
2-Napthylamine
ND
4-Nitro aniline
ND
2,4-Dinitrophenol
ND
Dibenzofuran
ND
Pentachlorobenzene
ND
2,4-Dinitrophenol
ND
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
ND
4-Nitrophenol
ND
Fluorene
ND
Diethyl phthalate
4.4 J
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
ND
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
ND
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
ND
Diphenylamine
ND
Diallate
ND
1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene
ND
4-Bronophenyl phenyl ether
ND
Phenacetin
ND
Hexachlorobenzene
ND
4-Aminobiphenyl
ND
Dinoseb
ND
Pentachlorophenol
ND
Pentachloronitrobenzene
ND
Phenanthrene
ND
Anthracene
ND
Di-n-butyl phthalate
4.1J
Isodrin
ND
Fluoranthene
ND
3,3 '-Dimethylbenzidine
ND
Pyrene
ND
Chlorobenzilate
ND
p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
ND
2-Acetylaminofluorene
ND
Benzyl butyl phthalate
91.3
10/1/96
m-28
WW8024.XLS
-------
Project:
Sample Id:
Target Analytes
Wastewood Combustion
9608024
Total jig
Date Acquired: 9/24/96
Date Sampled: 8/23/96
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND
Benzo (a) anthracene ND
Chrysene ND
di-n-octyl phthalate ND
Benzo (b) fluoranthene ND
7,12-Dimethylb enz (a) anthracene ND
Benzo (k) fluoranthene ND
Benzo (a) pyrene ND
3-Methylcholanthrene ND
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene ND
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene ND
Benzo (ghi) perylene ND
ND = not detected
NS = not spiked
J = present but lower than lowest calibration standard level
E = exceed calibration range
10/1/96
m-29
WW8024.XLS
-------
Waste Wood Combustion -Semivoiitile Analysis Modified Method 5 August,1996
Revised 10/30/96
Sample U
Untreated Waste Wood Test # 1
9608016
WWC-MM5-1
Date
6/13/96
Gas Stack
Sample Flow
Volume Rate
(dscm) (dscfm)
Flue Gas
02
<%)
Compound
Semivolatiles
(Total micro gram)
Semivolatiles Semivolatiles
(micro grams/dscm) (micro grams/dscm
3.4672 664.657
12.5
Untreated Waste Wood Test U 2
9606019
WWC-MMS-2
8/14/96
2.7916 586.901
13.2
0
1
U>
O
Untreated Waste Wood Test tt 3
9608020
WWC-MM5-3
8/15/96
2.9538 631.904
12.9
Phenol
7 J
2.0
' 3.3
2346.7
Acetophenone
7.9 J
2.3
3.6
2650.7
Hexachlorethane
N/D
Napthalene
2.6 J
0.7
1.2
872.4
2-Nitrophenol
2.2 J
0.6
1.1
738.2
2,4,6 - Trichlorophenol
N/D
1,4-Napthoquinone
N/D
Dimethyl phthalate
N/D
Diethyl phthalate
3.5 J
1.0
1.7
1174.4
Dibenzofuran
N/D
Phenanthrene
1.4 J
0.4
0.7
469.7
Di-n-butyl phthalate
2.3 J
0.7
1.1
771.7
Benzyl butyl phthalate
2.5 J
0.7
1.2
838.8
Phenol
2 J
0.7
1.3
714.5
Acetophenone
2.3 J
0.8
1.5
621.6
Hexachlorethane
N/D
Napthalene
2.2 J
0.8
1.4
785.9
2-Nitrophenol
10 J
3.6
6,4
3572.4
2,4,6 - Trichlorophenol
N/D
1,4-Napthoquinone
N/D
Dimethyl phthalate
1.8 J
0.6
1.2
6430
Diethyl phthalate
4.5 J
1.6
29
1607.6
Dibenzofuran
1.2 J
0.4
0.8
428.7
Phenanthrene
N/D
Di-n-butyt phthalate
2.4 J
0.9
15
857.4
Benzyl butyl phthalate
2.8 J
1.0
1.8
1000.3
Phenol
2.1 J
0.7
1.2
763.4
Acetophenone
3.1 J
1.0
1.8
1126.9
Hexachlorethane
N/D
Napthalene
8.9 J
3.0
5.2
3235.2
2-Nitrophenol
N/D
2,4,6 - Trichlorophenol
N/D
1,4-Napthoquinone
1.4 J
0.5
08
508.9
Dimethyl phthalate
N/D
Diethyl phthalate
1.5 J
0.5
09
545.3
Dibenzofuran
43 J
1.5
25
1563.1
Phenanthrene
1.7 J
0.6
1.0
618.0
Dl-n-butyl phthalate
1.5 J
0.5
09
545.3
Benzyl butyl phthalate
18.4 J
6.2
10.6
6688.6
Semivolatiles Semivolatiles
Emission Emission
Rate Rate
02) (mlcrograms/hr) (micrograms/hr @ 7% 02)
3886.8
4386.6
1443.7
1221.6
1943.4
777.4
1277.1
1388.1
1280.7
1472.9
1408.8
6403.7
1152.7
2881.7
768.4
1536.9
1793.0
1319.4
1947.7
5591.7
879.6
942.4
2701.6
1068.1
942 4
11560.5
-------
Waste Wood Combustion-Semlvolltlle Analysis Modified Method 5 August, 1996
Revised 10/30/96
Sample #
Treated Waste Wood Test # 1
9608022
WWC-MM5-4
Gas
Sample
Volume
(dscm)
Stack
Flow
Rate
(dscfm)
Flue Gas
02
(%)
Compound
Semtolatlles
(Total micro gram)
Semtojlatlles Semtoletiies
Emission Emission
Semt/olatlles SemtolatNes Rat* Rate
(micro grams/dscm) (micro grams/dacm ©7% 02) (mlcrograms/hr) (mfcrograms/hr © 1% 02)
4.1241 834.522
Treated Waste Wood Test # 2
9606023
WWC-MM5-5
3.7424 742.778
Treated Waste Wood Test 13
9608024
WWC-MM5-6
4.3594 911.610
Performance Evaluation Audit
9608033 Spiked 8/28/96 NA NA
WWC-P£A#|
8-23-96
WWC-MM5-FB
13.1 Phenol
5.6 J
1.4
2.4
Acetophenone
6 J
1.5
2.6
Hexachlorethane
N/D
Napthalene
1.9 J
05
0.6
2-NJtrophenol
1.1 J
0.3
05
2,4,6-Trlchlorophenol
17 J
0.4
0.7
1,4-Napthoqulnone
N/D
Dimethyl phthalate
N/0
Diethyl phthalate
1.3 J
0.3
06
Dlbenzofuran
N/D
Phenanthrene
N/D
Dl-n-butyl phthalate
14 J
0.3
0.6
Benzyl butyl phthalate
29 5 J
7.2
12.7
13.1 Phenol
61 J
1.6
2.9
Acetophenone
6.9 J
18
3.3
Hexachlorethane
N/D
Napthalene
1.5 J
04
0.7
2-Nltfophenol
N/D
2,4,6-Trlchlorophenol
16 J
0.4
0.6
1,4-Napthoqulnone
N/D
Dimethyl phthalate
N/D
Diethyl phthalate
39 J
10
1.9
Dlbenzofuran
N/D
Phenanthrene
N/D
Dl-n-butyl phthalate
3 J
06
14
Benzyl butyl phthalate
53.8
14 4
256
13.3 Phenol
65 J
15
2.7
Acetophenone
57 J
13
2.4
Hexachlorethane
N/D
Napthalene
19 J
0 4
0.6
2-Nitrophenol
N/D
2,4,6-Trlchlorophenol
N/D
1,4-Napthoqulnone
N/D
Dimethyl phthalate
N/D
Diethyl phthalate
4.4 J
1.0
16
Dibenzofuran
N/D
Phenanthrene
N/D
Dl-n-butyl phthalate
4 1 J
09
17
Benzyl butyl phthalate
91.3
20 9
360
NA Acetophenone
1 J
Napthalene
367
Acenapthylene
34.6
Acenapthene
39.3
Fluorene
423
Diethyl phthalate
1.1 J
Phenanthrene
45,7
Anthracene
454
Dl-n-butyl phthalate
41.7
Fluoranthene
40.3
Pyrene
49.7
Benzo(a)anthracene
41.9
Chrysene
42.1
Benzo(b)fluoralhene
42.3
Benzo(K)f|uorathene
49
Benzocd)pyrene
42.5
Dlbenz(a,h)anthracene
37.6
6enzo(ghl)perylene
45.3
NA Diethyl phthalate
1.4 J
Dl-n-butyl phthalate
2.1 J
Benzyl butyl phthalate
41.4
2040 9
2186.6
692.4
400.9
619.5
510.2
10750.9
2057.2
2327.0
605.9
639.6
1011.6
18144.1
2309.6
2025.4
675.1
1456.6
32441.3
3635.1
3894.8
1233.3
714.0
1103.5
908.8
19149.2
3664.3
4144.8
901.1
961.1
1802.1
32317.7
4186.4
3672 9
0.0
1224.3
2641.9
56831.3
'** J • Present but lower than the lowest calibrated standard level
'"NO - None Detect
-------
APPENDIX IV PCDD/PCDF ANALYSIS RESULTS
IV-1
-------
TCDD SUMMARY, nanograms/dscm
@ 7% Oxygen
TEST NO.
Front Half
Total
Front Half
TEQ
Back Half
Total
Back Half
TEQ
Combined
Total
Combined
TEQ
untreated
1
1.19
0.043
7.19
0.091
8.43
0.136
untreated
2
0.80
0.035
1.85
0.032
2.63
0.066
untreated
3
0.21
0.026
0.74
0.027
0.95
0.053
treated
1
11.60
0.301
3.78
0.105
15.03
0.397
treated
2
13.82
0.354
7.67
0.165
20.88
0.503
treated
3
11.91
0.323
7.37
0.167
18.72
0.475
-------
TCDF SUMMARY, nanograms/dscm
@7% Oxygen
3
i
TEST NO.
Front Half
Total
Front Half
TEQ
Back Half
Total
Back Half
TEQ
Combined
Total
Combined
TEQ
untreated
1
3.30
0.090
18.85
0.279
22.29
0.373
untreated
2
2.23
0.057
15.0
0.087
17.15
0.142
untreated
3
0.55
0.018
10.57
0.036
11.12
0.054
treated
1
28.90
0.575
14.14
0.349
42.19
0.907
treated
2
20.90
0.424
36.50
0.309
56.47
0.714
treated
3
18.05
0.344
27.84
0.248
45.04
0.576
-------
TRIANGLE LAflORATORIES, INC. Page 1
Sample Result Summary for Project 38S72A 09/18/96
Method 23X Full Screen Analyses (DB-5)
Data File
W103702
W103703
W103704
W103705
Sample ID
TLI Front Half
WWC-M23-1-1,2,3
WWC-M23-2-1,2,3
WWC-M23-3-1, 2, 3
Blank
Units
ng
ng
ng
ng
Analytes
2378-TCDD
(0.01)
(0.03)
(0.02)
(0.02)
12378-PeCDD
(0 .02)
(0.07)
(0.04)
(0.03)
123478-HxCDD
(0.02)
0 .04
(0.03)
(0.02)
123 678-HxCDD
(0.02)
0 .05
0.03
(0.02)
123789-HxCDD
(0.02)
0.10
0 .05
(0.02)
1234678-HpCDD
(0.02)
0.30
0 .15
0.11
OCDD
(0.03)
1.2
0 .61
1.3
237 8-TCDF
(0.009)
0.35
0 .18
0 .06
12378-PeCDF
(0:01)
{0.-05}
{0.03}
(0.02)
23478-PeCDF
(0.01)
0.18
0 .08
{0 .02}
123478-HxCDF
(0.01)
0 .25
0 .12
0.05
123678-HxCDF
(0.01)
0 .10
0 .05
0.02
234678-HxCDF
(0.01)
0.15
{0.06}
0.03
123789-HxCDF
(0.01)
(0.04)
(0.02)
(0.02)
1234678-HpCDF
(0.01)
0.25
0.13
o.os
1234739-HpCDF
(0.02)
{0 .04}
0 .03
(0.02)
OCDF
(0 .03)
0.15
0 .10
{0.07}
Total MCDD
(0.008)
(0.02)
(0.01)
(0.01)
Total DCDD
(0.01)
(0.03)
(0.02)
(0.01)
Total TriCDD
(0.02)
0 .11
0.05
(0.03)
TOTAL TCDD
(0.01)
0.31
0 .24
{0.03}
TOTAL PeCDD
(0.02)
0 .34
0 .34
0.06
TOTAL HxCDD
(0.02)
0.99
0 .25
{0.10}
TOTAL HpCDD
(0.02)
0 .65
0.31
0.11
Total MCDF
0.07
0.66
1.1
{0.20}
Total DCDF
(0.02)
(0.05)
(0.03)
(0.02)
Total TriCDF
(0.01)
1.3
0 .25
0.15
TOTAL TCDF
(0.009)
1.9
0 .77
0.14
TOTAL PeCDF
(0.01)
1.4
0.54
0.07
TOTAL HxCDF
(0.01)
1.0
0.34
0.14
TOTAL HpCDF
(0.01)
0 .34
0.25
0.13
Other Standards
Percent Recovery Summary (% Rec)
37C1-TCDD
104
.116
120
104
13012-PeCDF 234
104
107
113
104
13C12-HxCDF 478
95.3
108
113
102
13C12-HxCDD 473
83 .6
106
104
94.4
13CI2-HpCDF 789
95.4
107
105
98.9
Other Standards
Percent Recovery Summary (% Rec)
13C12-HxCDF 789
80 .7
59.7
95.5
72.5
13C12-HxCDF 234
90 .8
60.3
106
77.1
Internal Standards Percent Recovery
Summary (% Rec)
13C12-2378-TCDF
70 .7
48.2
65.9
63.5
13C12-2378-TCDD
66.9
43 .2
62 .5
58.2
13C12-PeCDF 123
72.2
49.0
67 .7
60.9
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.® Analytical Services Division
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Printed: 03:44 09/18/96
Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 TV-4
-------
/
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
Sample , Result Summary far Project 3 8 67.2A
Method 23X Full Screen Analyses (DB-5)
Page 2
09/18/36
Data File
Sample ID
Units
W103702
TLI Front Half
Blank
ng
W103703
WWC-M23-1-1,2,3
ng
Wl-03-704
WWC-M23-2-1, 2, 3
ng
W103705
WWC-M23-3-1,2,3
ng
Internal Standards
Percent
Recovery Summary (% Rec)
13C12-PeCDD 123
69.1
41.4
62.5
52.8
13C12-HxCDF 678
75.7
51.1
74.4
62.8
13C12-HxCDD 678
94 .8
55.1
84.8
69.9
13012-HpCDF 678
68.8
47.1
74.2
60.6
13C12-HpCDD 678
86.0
57.9
87.1
72.2
13C12-OCDD
69.2
44.5
67.6
53.6
Triangia Laboratories, Inc.® Analytical Services Division
101 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Printed: 03:44 09/18/96
3hone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 n n
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES,
INC.
Page 3
Sample Result
Summary for Project 38S72A
09/18/96
Method 23X Full Screen Analyses (DB-5)
Data File
W103706
W103707
W103708
W103709
Sample ID
WWC-M23-4-1, 2, 3
WWC-M2 3-5-1,2,
,3 WWC-M23-6-1,2,3
' r'*
WWC-M23-FB-
"3
Units
ng
ng
ng
J
ng
Analyses
23 78-TCDD
0.12
0.15
0.15
(0.01)
12378-PeCDD
0 .59
0 .58
0 .66
(0.02)
123478-HxCDD
0.56
0 .44
0.45
(0.01)
123678-HxCDD
0.72
0.61
0.62
(0.01)
12378 9-HxCDD
1.3
1.1
1.2
(0.01)
1234678-HpCDD
5.2
4.2
4.1
(0.03}
OCDD
10.2
12.9
12.3
0 .08
2378-TCDF
1.7
1.1
1.1
(0.007)
12378-PeCDF
0.77
0.54
0 .56
- (0.01)
23478-PeCDF
1.1
0 .72
0.70
(0.01)
123478-HxCDF
2.5
1.5
1.3
(0.008)
123 678-HxCDF
1.3
0.74
0.67
(0.006)
234678-HxCDF
1.7
0 .84
0.80
{0.02}
123789-HxCDF
0.19
{0 .09)
0.08
(0.01)
1234678-HpCDF
4.7
2.3
2.2
(0.007)
1234789-HpCDF
2.0
0.79
0.68
(0.01)
OCDF
9.6
4.2
3 .7
(0.02)
Total MCDD
(0.04)
(0.06)
(0.06)
(0.007)
Total DCDD
0.11
0 .40
0.39
(0.01)
Total TriCDD
0 .58
0.74
0.79
(0.02)
TOTAL TCDD
3.1
3.8
4.0
0.12
TOTAL PeCDD
5.8
6.3
6.9
{0.14}
TOTAL HxCDD
9.0
8.6
8.3
0.12
TOTAL HpCDD
9.7
7.8
7.6
{0.05}
Total MCDF
4.0
4.2
4.8
0.12
Total DCDF
3.4
2.2
3.1
(0.01)
Total TriCDF
3.7
3.0
3.0
0.03
TOTAL TCDF
9.6
6.8
7.5
(0.007)
TOTAL PeCDF
12.6
8.2
8.2
(0.01)
TOTAL HxCDF
14.7
7.8
. 7.1
{0.02}
TOTAL HpCDF
13 .0
5.5
' 5.1
(0.008)
Other Standards
Percent Recovery
Summary (% Rec)
37C1-TCDD
111
109
149
111
13C12-PeCDF 234
111
104
146
110
13C12-HxCDF 478
102
106
133
105
13C12-HxCDD 478
99.8
94.0
125
101
13C12-HpCDF 789
103
99 .8
137
105
Other Standards
Percent Recovery
Summary (% Rec)
13C12-HxCDF 789
105
87.2
113
99 .8
13C12-HxCDF 234
112
92.1
118
106
Internal Standards Percent Recovery Summary (% Rec).
13C12-2378-TCDF
39 .8
80.5
72 .0
92.9
13C12-2378-TCDD
80 .9
67 .5
63 .0
79.5
13C12-PeCDF 123
91.7
73 .1
69 .6
88.0
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.® Analytical Services Division
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Printed: 03:44 09/18/96
Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 ^ r ^ n
IV-6 5^/4
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
.Sample .Result Summary for Project 38672A
Method 23X Fullt Screen Analyses (DB-5)
Page 4
. 09/18/96
Data File W10370S W103707 W103708 W103709
Sample ID WWC-M23-4-1, 2, 3 WWC-M23-5-1, 2, 3 WWC-M23-6-1, 2, 3 WWC-M23-FB-1, 2,
3
Units ng ng ng ng
Internal Standards
Percent
Recovery Summary (% Rec)
13C12-PeCDD 123
84.2
61.1
59.3
73 .0
13C12-HXCDF 678
90.9
74.9
72.4
82.8
13C12-HXCDD 678
99.3
81.6
79.6
88.8
13C12-HpCDF 678
93.6
75.9
69.5
83 .7
13C12-HpCDD 678
107
90 .8
87.1
108
13C12-OCDD
91.5
68.0
63.5
76.6
{Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration}, (Detection Limit).
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.® Analytical Services Division
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 _ Printed: 03:44 09/18/96
Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 1V_/
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
Sample Result^ Spmmary for Project 38672A
Method 23X (DB-225)
Page 1
09/18/96
Data File P953050 P963051 P963052 P9S3055
Sample ID WWC-M23-1-1, 2, 3 WWC-M23-2-1,2,3 WWC-M23-3-1,2,3 WWC-M23-4-1,2,3
Units ng ng ng ng
Analytes
2378-TCDF 0.08 '' 0.04 {0.02} 0.38
Internal Standards Percent Recovery Summary (% Rec)
13C12-2378-TCDF S3.9 90.3 80.3 101
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.© Analytical Services Division
801 Capitals Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Printed: 03:14 09/18/96
Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 IV-8 o -
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC. Page 2
Sample Result Summary for Project 38672A 09/18/96
Method 23X (DB-225)
Data File P963056 P963057
Sample ID WWC-M23-5-1,2,3 WWC-M23-6-1,2,3
Units ng ng
Analytes
2378-TCDF 0.28 0.29
v1 '
Internal Standards Percent Recovery Summary (% Rec)
13C12-2378-TCDF 93.6 85.9
{Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration} .
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.® Analytical Services Division
801 Capitola Drive « Durham, North Carolina 27713 Printed: 03:14 09/18/96
Phone: (919) 544-5729 ~ Fax: (919) 544-5491 o
-------
/
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
Page 1
/
Sample Result
Summary for Project
386723
09/20/96
/
Method 8290X
Full Screen Analyses
(DB-5)
Daca File
¦ W103712
W103713
W102714
"WIQ3715
Sample' 10 ¦
¦ TLI-Back -Half B
¦ . WWC-M23-1-.6 -. -.WWC-M23c2r6.....
. WWC-M23.-3
lank
Units
ng
ng
ng
ng
Analytes
2378-TCDD ' '
(0.01) •
0.05
0.02
(0.02)
12378-PeCDD
(0.02) -
0.15 .
0.04.
(0.04)
¦123478-HxCDD •
(0..01)
. 0.J.0
. {0.02}
(0.02)
123 678-HxCDD
(0.01)
0.15
{0.03}
(0.01)
123789-HxCDD
(0.01)
0.23
{0.04}
(0-01)
1234678-HpCDD
(0.01)
0.49
{0.10}
0.04
OCDD
(0.02)
1.3
0.24
0.31
2378-TCDF " " "
' TOTO'06)'" "
" 1:5"
¦ 0.40 ¦
.-•¦-..•0.34.
12378-PeCDF
(0.01)
0 .24
0 . 07-
0 .04
23478-PeCDF
(0.01)
0 .53
0 .13
{0.04}
12347 8-HxCDF
(0.007)
0.59
0.13
0 .06
123678-HxCDF
(0.006)
0.25
0.06
C . 02
234678-HxCDF
(0.007)
0.32
0 .07
0 .03
123789-HxCDF
(0.008)
0.02
(0.01)
(0.02)
1234678-HpCDF
(0.006)
0.46
0.09
0.04
1234789-HpCDF
(0.01)
0 .08
{0.01}
(0.02)
OCDF
(0.02)
0.22
0.04
0 .02
Total MCDD
(0.007)
0 .57
0 .44
0.28
Total DCDD
(0.009)
0.82
0.39
0 .22
Total TriCDD
(0.02).
0 .38
0.23 '
{0.11}
TOTAL TCDD
(0.01)
4.5
0.94
0.35
TOTAL PeCDD
(0.02)
3 . 6
0 .43
0 .12
TOTAL HxCDD
(0.01)
2.8
0.38
0 .07
TOTAL HpCDD
(0.01)
1.0
0.10
0.08
Total MCDF
0 .14
{0.29}
12.5
10.4
Tocal DCDF
(0.01)
12.5
4.9
3 .7
Total TriCDF
{0.02}
6.0
1.9
1.1
TOTAL TCDF
(0.006)
9.1
2.5
1.6
TOTAL PeCDF
(0.01)
5.4
¦ 1.1 • . ¦
.. 0.44
TOTAL HxCDF ¦
¦¦ {0.008}
•2.8 .
0.53
. . 0.25
TOTAL HpCDF'
(0.008)'
0.85
' ••O.'IS' ' -
• 0:05
Other Standards
Percent Recovery Summajry (% Rec)
37C1-TCDD
102
99 . 6
105
103
13C12-PeCDF 234
97 .0
95.7
97.0
95.9
13C12-HxCDF 478
92 .1
93 .6
93 .9
94.0
13C12-HxCDD 478
86 .0
84.0
80 .5
-55.7
13C12-HpCDF 789
96 .4
90.3
97.8
94.9
Other Standards
Percent Recovery
Summary (% Rec)
13C12-HxCDF 789
99 .8
73 .3
91.5 ; .
97.4
13C12-HxCDF 234
104
79.0
92.7
91.8
Internal Standards Percent Recovery Summary (% Rec)
13C12-2378-TCDF
95 .8
75.2
82.2
91.1
13C12-2378-TCDD
81.2
64 .8
67 .5
77 .8
13C12-PeCDF 123
86.9
69.3
70 .0
77.2
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.® Analytical Services Division
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Printed: 03:44 09/20/96
Phone: (919) 544-5729 ~ Fax: (919) 544-5491 1 n
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
Sample Result Summary for Project 3 8672B
Method 8290X Full Screen Analyses (DB-5)
Page 2
.09/20/3.6
Data File
¦Sample. -ID
Units
W103712
-TLI. Back.Half B
lank
ng
"W1037"13" '
...WWC-M23-1-6
ng
" W103714"' •'
WWC-M23-2-6.
ng
•' W10371S • •
WWC-M23 -3-6
ng
Internal Standards
Percent
Recovery Summary (% Rec)
13C12-PeCDD 123
70 .1
54.7
55.4
67.6
13C12-HxCDF 673
85.1
65.6
78.5
79.9
13C12-HxCDD .678
88.9
68.8
85.8
133
13C12-HpCDF 678
85.0.
67.8. "
78.8
85.4
13C12-HpCDD 678
100
79 .3
91.9
100 .0'
13C12-OCDD
77.9
58.8
68.7
79.4
Triangie Laboratories, Inc.© Analytical Services Division
801 Capitoia Drive ~ Durham, North Carolina 27713 Printed: 03:44 09/20/96
Phone: (919) 544-5729 ~ Fax: (919) 544-5491 9 9
-------
/
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
Page 3
J
Sample Result
Summary for Project
386723
09/20/96
/
V
Method 8290X
Full Screen Analyses
(DB-5)
Data File
W10371S
W103717
' W103718
>7104401'
Sample' ID ¦"
•• ¦¦WWC-M23-4-6- •
,WWC-M23-5.tS . .WWC-M22-6r6 . ...
WWC-M23-FB-
Units
ng
ng
ng
ng
Analytes
237 8-TCDD
{0.09}
0.12
0.13
(0.04)
12378-PeCDD
0.24
0-30
0.39
(0.08)
123478-HxCDD
0.13
0.13
0.19
(0.08)
123 67 8-HxCDD
0 .16
0 .23
0.21
CO L 06)
123789-HxCDD
0 .22
0 .32
0.37
(0.07)
123 4678-HpCDD
0 .28
0.68
0.80
(0.08)
OCDD
{0.07}
1.4
2.1
(0.2)
2373-TCDF
2.0
1.5- •
1.4 ¦'
(0.03)
123 7 8-PeCDF
0.59
-0 . 54
0 .51
(C.05)
23478-PeCDF
0 .84
0.59
0 .56
(0.05)
123473-HxCDF
1.1
. 0.83
0.79
(0.04)
123.67 8-HxCDF:_¦ -
0.52 .
0.41
0.40
(0.04)
234678-HxCDF
0.51
' '• ' 0138
¦ :"" (C .C5) ---
123789-HxCDF.
Q .06
0.04
0.04
(0.05)
1234678-HoCDF
0 .72
0.79
0 .79
(0.04)
123 473 9-HpCDF
0 .24
0 .22
{0.15}
(0.06)
OCDF
{0.21}
0.76
0.65
(0.1)
Total MCDD
(0.02)
0.90
0 .81
(0.0)
Toral DCDD
(0.02)
1.0
1.5
(0-0) •
Tocal TriCDD
(C . 04).
1.5
1.4
(0.0)
TOTAL TCDD
"» —
5.1
5.3
(0.04)
TOTAL PeCDD
J . -
3 .3
4.4
(0.08)
TOTAL HxCDD
. 1
2.9
3 .2
(0.07)
TOTAL HpCDD
0.53
1.4
1.6
(0.03)
Total MCDF
(0.01)
23 .9
25 .3
(0.0)
Total DCDF
(C . 03)
13 .9
12 .0
(0.0)
Total TriCDF
{0.05}
a . 1
5 . 6
(0.0)
TOTAL TCDF
15 . 6
12.2
' t ^
(C.03)
TOTAL 'PeCDF *'
• ••1-1-V2- 6-.0<
TOTAL HxCDF
7.-0
4.8
4.2
(0.04)
TOTAL HpCDF
1.5
1.9
1.5
(0.05)
Other Standards
Percent Recovery
Summary (% Rec)
37C1-TCDD
103
103
106
104
13C12-PeCDF 234
"L C 2
9 5.9
96.2
95.0
13C12-HxCDF 478
97 .0
97 .0
96.5
9S.1
'13 C12 -HxCDD 478
33 .3
84.1 •
84.5
97.6
13C12-HpCDF 789
94 .7
97.4
95.7
94.8
Ocl-er Standards
Peroer." Recovery
Summary (% rcec:
13C12-HxCDF 789
95.6
77 .6
70.3 . .
2 5.9
13C12-HxCDF 234
9 9 .9
76.7
72.9
c - . g
Internal Standar
¦ds Percent Recovery Summary (% Rec)
13C12-2378-TCDF
87 .7
71.7
72.0
7S.0
13C12-2378-TCDD
71.6
59.3
58.1
72.3
13C12-?eCDF '123
72.1
53 .3
53.6
75.8
Triangie Laboratories, lnc.3 Analytical Services Division
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Printed: 03:44 09/20/96
Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 IV-12 ^0
-------
/ TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC. Page 4
/ Sample Result Summary for Project 38S723 09/20/96
' Method 8290X Full Screen Analyses (DB-5)
Data File ¦•W103716- . W103717 W10371& W104401
Sample ID ' WWC-M23-4-6 • WWC-M23.-5-6 . .. WWCrM23-6-6 .. . WWC-M23-F3-6
Units ng ng ng ng
Internal Standards
Percent
Recovery Summary (% Rec)
13C12-PeCDD 123
58.6
• 45.6
44.2
68.7
13 C12-HxCDF 678
80.9
65.8
61.9
72.5
13C12-HxCDD 678
86.2
68.4
64.6
78.7
13C12-HpCDF 678
85.0
65.4
61.1
69.1
13C12-HpCDD 678
97.9
77.8
75 .7
80 .4
13C12-OCDD
73 .2
51.5
52.3
54.1
Triangie Laboratories, lnc.5 Analytical Services Division
B01 Capitola Drive • Durham. North Carolina 27713 Printed: 03:44 09/20/95
Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 IV 13 3 ^
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC. Page 5
Sample Result Summary for Project 386723 09/20/96
Method 8290X Full Screen Analyses (DB-5)
Data File WIO'4402 W104403' "
Samble ID' " TLl LCS ' " ' ' TLI tiCSD"
Units ng ng
Analytes
2378-TCDD 0.40 0.42
12378-PeCDD 2.1 2.1
123478-HxCDD 1.9 1.8
123 678-HxCDD 2.0 1.9
123789-HxCDD 2.1 1.8
1234678-HpCDD 1.9 1.8
OCDD 4.3• 3.9 <
2378-TCDF 0.38 0.38
12378-PeCDF 2.0 1.8
23478-PeCDF 1.9- 2.2
123478-HxCDF 1.9 1.8
123 67 8-HxCDF •• 2.-0-- ...2.0
234678-HxCDF 2.2 2.1
123789-HxCDF 2.2 2.1
1234678-HpCDF 1.9 1.9
123478 9-HpCDF 2.0 1.7
OCDF 3.9 3.8
Other Standards Percent Recovery Summary (% Rec)
37C1-TCDD 10S 109
13C12-?eCDr 22 4 104 114
13C12-HxCOr 4"2 134 103
. 13C.12-HxCDD 473 55.6 92.0
13C12-HpCDF 739 103 100
0-h.er St2.r.d.=.rz2 ?srcsn- P.eccverv SLun^is.^' (% Rec)
13 C12-KxCDr 75 9 74.3 " 91.9
13C12-HxCDF 234 v. 63 .1 _ _ .92 , 0 ..
Internal Standards Percent Recovery Summary (% Rec)
13C12-2378-TCDF 64.4 78.4
13C12-23 78-TCDD 62.2 71.2
13C12-PeCDF 123 66.7 67.4
13C12-?sCDD 123 57.2 73.6
13C12-KxCDF 67£ 52.5 7 0.3
13C12-HXCDD 678 65.8 90.5
13C12-HdCDF 678 -58.0 73.5
13 C12-HdCDD 67 3 "l.C S3.5
{is^invatsd Maximum possible Concentration}, (Defection Lim.it).
Triangle Laboratories, inc.3 Analytical Services Division
801 Capiiola Drive • Durham. North Carolina 27713
Phone: (919) 544-5729 ~ Fax: (919) 544-5491 IV-14
Printed: 03^139/20/95
-------
/
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC.
Sample Result Summary for Project 38672B
. Method 8290X.(DB-225).
Page 1
09/19/9S
Data 'File
Samsle ID
X963481
WWC-M23-1-6
' X963482
WWC-M23-2-6
X963483 -
WWC-M23-3-6
• X963484
WWC-M23 -4-6
Units
ng
ng
ng
Analytes
2378-TCDF
0.23
0.06
0.05
0.34
Internal Standards Percent Recovery Summary (% Rec)
13C12-2378-TCDF 56.6 70.1
80 .0
71.1
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.5 Analytical Services Division
801 Caprtola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phone: (919) 54-i-572S • Fax: (919) 544-5491 IV-15
Printed: 04:34 09/19/95
'.n
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC. Page 2
Sample Result Summary for Project 386723 09/19/96
Method 8290X (D3-225)
A ===================i====i
f' ¦ ' Data File- • ¦ .X963485 " X9634B6
Samnle ID WWC-M23-5-6 ' WWC-M23-6-6"
Units ng ng
Analytes
2378-TCDF 0.26 0.26
Internal Standards Percent Recovery Summary (% Rec)
13C12-2378-TCDF 62.5 60.2
Triangie Laboratories. Inc.? Analytical Services Division
SOT Capitola Drive ~ Durham, North Carolina 27713 Printed: 04:3-
Phone: (91S) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 , O '*
-------
Dioxin Toxicity Equivalency Value Calculations for sample WWC-M23-1
Untreated Waste Wood Test #1
Date 8/13/96
Toxicity
Toxicity
Toxicity
Toxicity
Equivalency
Front Half
Equivalency
Back Half
Equivalency
Combined
Equivalency
Factor
Totals
Value
Totals
Value
Totals
Value
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1
0.03
0.03
0.05
0.05
0.08
0.08
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
0.5
0.07
0.035
0.15
0.075
0.22
0.11
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
0.1
0.04
0.004
0.1
0.01
0.14
0.014
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
0.1
0.06
0.006
0.15
0.015
0.21
0.021
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
0.1
0.1
0.01
0.23
0.023
0.33
0.033
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
0.01
0.3
0.003
0.49
0.0049
0.79
0.0079
OCDD
0.001
1.2
0.0012
1.3
0.0013
2.5
0.0025
Total MCDD
N/A
0.02
N/A
0.57
N/A
0.59
0
Total DCDD
N/A
0.03
N/A
0.82
N/A
0.85
0
Total TriCDD
N/A
0.11
N/A
0.88
N/A
0.99
0
Total TCDD
N/A
0.31
N/A
4.5
N/A
4.81
0
Total PeCDD
N/A
0.34
N/A
3.6
N/A
3.94
0
Total HxCDD
N/A
0.99
N/A
2.8
N/A
3.79
0
Total HpCDD
N/A
0.65
N/A
1
N/A
1.65
0
Front half
Back half
Front half+Bad
Sum (nanograms)
2.45
0.0892
14.17
0.1792
16.62
0.2684
Volume of flue gas collected (dscm)
3.4081
3.4081
3.41
Total Dioxin (nanograms/dscm)
0.72
4.16
4.88
Total Dioxin @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
1.19
7.19
8.43
TEV Dioxin (nanograms/dscm)
0.026
0.053
0.079
TEV Dioxin @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
0.043
0.091
0.136
-------
Dioxin Toxicity Equivalency Value Calculations for sample WWC-M23-2
Untreated Waste Wood Test # 2
Date 8/14/96
Toxicity
Toxicity
Equivalency
Front Half
Equivalency
Factor
Totals
Value
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1
0.02
0.02
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
0.5
0.04
0.02
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
0.1
0.03
0.003
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
0.1
0.03
0.003
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
0.1
0.05
0.005
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
0.01
0.15
0.0015
OCDD
0.001
0.61
0.00061
Total MCDD
N/A
0.01
N/A
Total DCDD
N/A
0.02
N/A
Total TriCDD
N/A
0.05
N/A
Total TCDD
N/A
0.24
N/A
Total PeCDD
N/A
0.34
N/A
Total HxCDD
N/A
0.25
N/A
Total HpCDD
N/A
0.31
N/A
Sum (nanograms)
Volume of flue gas collected (dscm)
Total Dioxin (nanograms/dscm)
Total Dioxin @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
TEV Dioxin (nanograms/dscm)
TEV Dioxin @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
Front half
1.22 0.05311
2.7186
0.45
0.80
0.020
0.035
Toxicity
Back Half
Equivalency
Totals
Value
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.02
0.02
0.002
0.03
0.003
0.04
0.004
0.1
0.001
0.24
0.00024
0.44
N/A
0.39
N/A
0.23
N/A
0.94
N/A
0.43
N/A
0.38
N/A
0.1
N/A
Back half
2.91 0.05024
2.7186
1.07
1.85
0.018
Toxicity
Combined Equivalency
Totals Value
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
0.04
0.04
0.08
0.04
0.05
0.005
0.06
0.006
0.09
0.009
0.25
0.0025
0.85
0.00085
0.45
0
0.41
0
0.28
0
1.18
0
0.77
0
0.63
0
0.41
0
Front half+Back half
4.13 0.10335
2.72
1.52
2.63
0.038
0.032
0.066
-------
Dioxin Toxicity Equivalency Value Calculations for sample WWC-M23-3
Untreated Waste Wood Test # 3
Date 8/15/96
Toxicity
Toxicity
Equivalency
Front Half
Equivalency
Factor
Totals
Value
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1
0.02
0.02
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
0.5
0.03
0.015
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
0.1
0.02
0.002
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
0.1
0.02
0.002
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
0.1
0.02
0.002
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
0.01
0.11
0.0011
OCDD
0.001
1.3
0.0013
Total MCDD
N/A
0.01
N/A
Total DCDD
N/A
0.01
N/A
Total TriCDD
N/A
0.03
N/A
Total TCDD
N/A
0.03
N/A
Total PeCDD
N/A
0.06
N/A
Total HxCDD
N/A
0.1
N/A
Total HpCDD
N/A
0.11
N/A
Front half
Sum (nanograms)
0.35
0.0434
Volume of flue gas collected (dscm)
2.872
Total Dioxin (nanograms/dscm)
0.12
Total Dioxin @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
0.21
TEV Dioxin (nanograms/dscm)
0.015
TEV Dioxin @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
0.026
Toxicity
Back Half Equivalency
Totals Value
(nanograms) (nanograms)
0.02 0.02
0.04 0.02
0.02 0.002
0.01 0.001
0.01 0.001
0.04 0.0004
0.31 0.00031
0.28 N/A
0.22 N/A
0.11 N/A
0.35 N/A
0.12 N/A
0.07 N/A
0.08 N/A
Back half
1.23 0.04471
2.872
0.43
0.74
0.016
Toxicity
Combined
Equivalency
Totals
Value
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
0.04
0.04
0.07
0.035
0.04
0.004
0.03
0.003
0.03
0.003
0.15
0.0015
1.61
0.00161
0.29
0
0.23
0
0.14
0
0.38
0
0.18
0
0.17
0
0.19
0
Front half+Back half
1.58 0,08811
2.87
0.55
0.95
0.031
0.027
0.053
-------
Dioxin Toxicity Equivalency Value Calculations for sample WWC-M23-4
Treated Waste Wood Test # 1
Date 8/20/96
Toxicity
Toxicity
Toxicity
Toxicity
Equivalency
Front Half
Equivalency
Back Half
Equivalency
Combined
Equivalency
Factor
Totals
Value
Totals
Value
Totals
Value
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms) (nanograms)
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1
0.12
0.12
0.09
0.09
0.21
0.21
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
0.5
0.59
0.295
0.24
0.12
0.83
0.415
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
0.1
0.56
0.056
0.13
0.013
0.69
0.069
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
0.1
0.72
0.072
0.16
0.016
0.88
0.088
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
0.1
1.3
0.13
0.22
0.022
1.52
0.152
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
0.01
5.2
0.052
0.28
0.0028
5.48
0.0548
OCDD
0.001
10.2
0.0102
0.07
0.00007
10.27
0.01027
Total MCDD
N/A
0.04
N/A
0.02
N/A
0.06
0
Total DCDD
N/A
0.11
N/A
0.02
N/A
0.13
0
Total TriCDD
N/A
0.58
N/A
0.04
N/A
0.62
0
Total TCDD
N/A
3.1
N/A
3.5
N/A
6.6
0
Total PeCDD
N/A
5.8
N/A
3.3
N/A
9.1
0
Total HxCDD
N/A
9
N/A
2.1
N/A
11.1
0
Total HpCDD
N/A
9.7
N/A
0.53
N/A
10.23
0
Front half
Back half
Front half+BacI
Sum (nanograms)
28.33
0.7352
9.51
0.26387
37.84
0.99907
Volume of flue gas collected (dscm)
4.3505
4.3505
4.35
Total Dioxin (nanograms/dscm)
6.51
2.19
8.70
Total Dioxin @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
11.60
3.78
15.03
TEV Dioxin (nanograms/dscm)
0.169
0.061
0.230
TEV Dioxin @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
0.301
0.105
0.397
-------
Dioxin Toxicity Equivalency Value Calculations for sample WWC-M23-5
Treated Waste Wood Test# 2
Date 8/21/96
Toxicity Toxicity
Equivalency Front Half Equivalency
Factor Totals Value
(nanograms) (nanograms)
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1
0.15
0.15
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
0.5
0.58
0.29
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
0.1
0.44
0.044
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
0.1
0.61
0.061
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
0,1
1.1
0.11
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
0.01
4.2
0.042
OCDD
0.001
12.9
0.0129
Total MCDD
N/A
0,06
N/A
Total DCDD
N/A
0.4
N/A
Total TriCDD
N/A
0.74
N/A
Total TCDD
N/A
3.8
N/A
Total PeCDD
N/A
6.3
N/A
Total HxCDD
N/A
8.6
N/A
Total HpCDD
N/A
7.8
N/A
Front half
Sum (nanograms)
27.7
0.7099
Volume of flue gas collected (dscm)
3.6258
Total Dioxin (nanograms/dscm)
7.64
Total Dioxin @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
13.82
TEV Dioxin (nanograms/dscm)
0.196
TEV Dioxin @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
0.354
Toxicity
Back Half Equivalency
Totals Value
(nanograms) (nanograms)
0.12
0.12
0.3
0.15
0.13
0.013
0.23
0.023
0.32
0.032
0.68
0.0068
1.4
0.0014
0.9
N/A
1
N/A
1.5
N/A
5.1
N/A
3.3
N/A
2.9
N/A
1.4
N/A
Back half
16.1 0.3462
3.6258
4.44
7.67
0.095
Toxicity
Combined
Equivalency
Totals
Value
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
0.27
0.27
0.88
0.44
0.57
0.057
0.84
0.084
1.42
0.142
4.88
0.0488
14.3
0.0143
0.96
0
1.4
0
2.24
0
8.9
0
9.6
0
11.5
0
9.2
0
Front half+Back half
43.8 1.0561
3.63
12.08
20.88
0.291
0.165
0.503
-------
Dioxin Toxicity Equivalency Value Calculations for sample WWC-M23-6
Treated Waste Wood Test # 3
Date 8/22/96
Toxicity
Toxicity
Toxicity
Toxicity
Equivalency
Front Half
Equivalency
Back Half
Equivalency
Combined
Equivalency
Factor
Totals
Value
Totals
Value
Totals
Value
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1
0.15
0.15
0.13
0.13
0.28
0.28
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
0.5
0.66
0.33
0.39
0.195
1.05
0.525
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
0.1
0.45
0.045
0.19
0.019
0.64
0.064
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
0.1
0.62
0.062
0.21
0.021
0.83
0.083
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
0.1
1.2
0.12
0.37
0.037
1.57
0.157
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
0.01
4.1
0.041
0.8
0.008
4.9
0.049
OCDD
0.001
12.3
0.0123
2.1
0.0021
14.4
0.0144
Total MCDD
N/A
0.06
N/A
0.81
N/A
0.87
0
Total DCDD
N/A
0.39
N/A
1.5
N/A
1.89
0
Total TriCDD
N/A
0.79
N/A
1.4
N/A
2.19
0
Total TCDD
N/A
4
N/A
5.3
N/A
9.3
0
Total PeCDD
N/A
6.9
N/A
4.4
N/A
11.3
0
Total HxCDD
N/A
8.3
N/A
3.2
N/A
11.5
0
Total HpCDD
N/A
7.6
N/A
1.6
N/A
9.2
0
Front half
Back half
Front half+Bac
Sum (nanograms)
28.04
0.7603
18.21
0.4121
46.25
1.1724
Volume of flue gas collected (dscm)
4.2691
4.2691
4.27
Total Dioxin (nanograms/dscm)
6.57
4.27
10.83
Total Dioxin @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
11.91
7.37
18.72
TEV Dioxin (nanograms/dscm)
0.178
0.097
0.275
TEV Dioxin @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
0.323
0.167
0.475
-------
Furan Toxicity Equivalency Value Calculations for sample WWC-M23-1
Untreated Waste Wood Test #1
Date 8/13/96
Toxicity
Toxicity
Equivalency
Front Half
Equivalency
Factor
Totals
Value
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
2,3,7.8-TCDF
0.1
0.35
0.035
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
0.05
0.05
0.0025
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
0.5
0.18
0.09
1,2,3,4,7.8-HxCDF
0.1
0.25
0.025
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
0.1
0.1
0.01
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
0.1
0.15
0,015
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
0.1
0.04
0.004
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
0.01
0.25
0.0025
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
0.01
0.04
0.0004
OCDF
0.001
0.15
0.00015
Total MCDF
N/A
0.66
N/A
Total DCDF
N/A
0.05
N/A
Total TriCDF
N/A
1.3
N/A
Total TCDF
N/A
1.9
N/A
Total PeCDF
N/A
1.4
N/A
Total HxCDF
N/A
1
N/A
Total HpCDF
N/A
0.34
N/A
Front half
Sum (nanograms) 6.8 0.18455
Volume of flue gas collected (dscm) 3.4081
Total Furan (nanograms/dscm) 2.00
Total Furan @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm) 3.30
TEV Furan (nanograms/dscm) 0.054
TEV Furan @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
0.090
Toxicity
Back Half Equivalency
Totals Value
(nanograms) (nanograms)
1.5
0.15
0.24
0.012
0.53
0.265
0.59
0.059
0.25
0.025
0.32
0.032
0.02
0.002
0.46
0.0046
0.08
0.0008
0.22
0.00022
0.29
N/A
12.5
N/A
6
N/A
9.1
, N/A
5.4
N/A
2.8
N/A
0.85
N/A
Back half
37.16 0.55062
3.4081
10.90
18.85
0.162
Toxicity
Combined Equivalency
Totals Value
(nanograms) (nanograms)
1.85
0.185
0.29
0.0145
0.71
0.355
0.84
0.084
0.35
0.035
0.47
0.047
0.06
0.006
0.71
0.0071
0.12
0.0012
0.37
0.00037
0.95
0
12.55
0
7.3
0
11
0
6.8
0
3.8
0
1.19
0
Front half+Back half
43.96 0.73517
3.41
12.90
22.29
0.216
0.279
0.373
-------
Furan Toxicity Equivalency Value Calculations for sample WWC-M23-2
Unlreated Waste Wood Test # 2
Date 8/14/96
Toxicity
Toxicity
Equivalency
Front Half
Equivalency
Factor
Totals
Value
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
2,3,7,8-TCDF
0.1
0.18
0.018
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
0.05
0.03
0.0015
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
0.5
0.08
0.04
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
0.1
0.12
0.012
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
0.1
0.05
0.005
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
0.1
0,06
0.006
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
0.1
0.02
0.002
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
0.01
0.13
0.0013
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
0.01
0.03
0.0003
OCDF
0.001
0.1
0.0001
Total MCDF
N/A
1.1
N/A
Total DCDF
N/A
0.03
N/A
Total TriCDF
N/A
0.25
N/A
Total TCDF
N/A
0.77
N/A
Total PeCDF
N/A
0.54
N/A
Total HxCDF
N/A
0.34
N/A
Total HpCDF
N/A
0.25
N/A
Front half
Sum (nanograms) 3.38 0.0862
Volume of flue gas collected (dscm) 2.7186
Total Furan (nanograms/dscm) 1.24
Total Furan @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm) 2.23
TEV Furan (nanograms/dscm) 0.032
TEV Furan @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
0.057
Toxicity
Toxicity
Back Half
Equivalency
Combined
Equivalency
Totals
Value
Totals
Value
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
0.4
0.04
0.58
0.058
0.07
0.0035
0.1
0.005
0.13
0.065
0.21
0.105
0.13
0.013
0.25
0.025
0.06
0.006
0.11
0.011
0.07
0.007
0.13
0.013
0.01
0.001
0.03
0.003
0.09
0.0009
0.22
0.0022
0.01
0.0001
0.04
0.0004
0.04
0.00004
0.14
0.00014
12.5
N/A
13.6
0
4.9
N/A
4.93
0
1.9
N/A
2.15
0
2.5
N/A
3.27
0
1.1
N/A
1.64
0
0.53
N/A
0.87
0
0.13
N/A
0.38
0
Back half
23.6 0.13654
2.7186
8.68
15.00
0.050
Front half+Back half
26.98 0.22274
2.72
9.92
17.15
0.082
0.087
0.142
-------
Furan Toxicity Equivalency Value Calculations for sample WWC-M23-3
Untreated Waste Wood Test # 3
Date 8/15/96
Toxicity
Toxicity
Equivalency
Front Half
Equivalency
Factor
Totals
Value
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
2,3,7,8-TCDF
0.1
0.06
0.006
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
0.05
0.02
0.001
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
0.5
0.02
0.01
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
0.1
0.05
0.005
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
0.1
0.02
0.002
2,3,4.6,7,8-HxCDF
0.1
0.03
0.003
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
0.1
0.02
0.002
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
0.01
0.06
0,0006
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
0.01
0.02
0.0002
OCDF
0.001
0.07
0.00007
Total MCDF
N/A
0.2
N/A
Total DCDF
N/A
0.02
N/A
Total TriCDF
N/A
0.15
N/A
Total TCDF
N/A
0.14
N/A
Total PeCDF
N/A
0.07
N/A
Total HxCDF
N/A
0.14
N/A
Total HpCDF
N/A
0.13
N/A
Front half
Sum (nanograms) 0.92 0.02907
Volume of flue gas collected (dscm) 2.872
Total Furan (nanograms/dscm) 0 32
Total Furan @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm) 0.55
TEV Furan (nanograms/dscm) 0.010
TEV Furan @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm) 0.018
Back Half
Totals
Toxicity
Equivalency
Value
Combined
Totals
Toxicity
Equivalency
Value
ograms) (nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
0.24
0.024
0.3
0.03
0.04
0.002
0.06
0.003
0.04
0.02
0.06
0.03
0.06
0.006
0.11
0.011
0.02
0.002
0.04
0.004
0.03
0.003
0.06
0.006
0.02
0.002
0.04
0.004
0.04
0.0004
0.1
0.001
0.02
0.0002
0.04
0.0004
0.02
0.00002
0.09
0.00009
10.4
N/A
10.6
0
3.7
N/A
3.72
0
1.1
N/A
1.25
0
1.6
N/A
1.74
0
0.44
N/A
0.51
0
0.25
N/A
0.39
0
0.05 •
N/A
0.18
0
Back half
17.56 0.05962
2.872
6.11
10.57
Front half+Back half
18.48 0.08949
2.87
6.43
11.12
0.021
0.031
0.036
0.054
-------
Furan Toxicity Equivalency Value Calculations for sample WWC-M23-4
Treated Waste Wood Test # 1
Date 8/20/96
Toxicity
Toxicity
Toxicity
Toxicity
Equivalency
Front Half
Equivalency
Back Half
Equivalency
Combined
Equivalency
Factor
Totals
Value
Totals
Value
Totals
Value
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
2,3,7,8-TCDF
0.1
1.7
0.17
2
0.2
3.7
0.37
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
0.05
0.77
0.0385
0.59
0.0295
1.36
0.068
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
0.5
1.1
0.55
0.84
0.42
1.94
0.97
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
0.1
2.5
0.25
1.1
0.11
3.6
0.36
1,2.3,6,7,8-HxCDF
0.1
1.3
0.13
0.52
0.052
1.82
0.182
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
0.1
1.7
0.17
0.51
0.051
2.21
0.221
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
0.1
0.19
0.019
0.06
0.006
0.25
0.025
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
0.01
4.7
0.047
0.72
0.0072
5.42
0.0542
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
0.01
2
0.02
0.24
0.0024
2.24
0.0224
OCDF
0.001
9.6
0.0096
0.21
0.00021
9.81
0.00981
Total MCDF
N/A
4
N/A
0.01
N/A
4.01
0
Total DCDF
N/A
3.4
N/A
0.03
N/A
3.43
0
Total TriCDF
N/A
3.7
N/A
0.05
N/A
3.75
0
Total TCDF
N/A
9.6
N/A
15.6
N/A
25.2
0
Total PeCDF
N/A
12.6
N/A
11.2
N/A
23.8
0
Total HxCDF
N/A
14.7
N/A
7
N/A
21.7
0
Total HpCDF
N/A
13
N/A
1.5
N/A
14.5
0
Front half
Back half
Front half+Bact
Sum (nanograms)
70.6
1.4041
35.6
0.87831
106.2
2.28241
Volume of flue gas collected (dscm)
4.3505
4.3505
4.35
Total Furan (nanograms/dscm)
16.23
8.18
24.41
Total Furan @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
28.90
14.14
42.19
TEV Furan (nanograms/dscm)
0.323
0.202
0.525
TEV Furan @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
0.575
0.349
0.907
-------
Furan Toxicity Equivalency Value Calculations for sample WWC-M23-5
Treated Waste Wood Test# 2
Date 8/21/96
Toxicity
Toxicity
Toxicity
Toxicity
Equivalency
Front Half
Equivalency
Back Half
Equivalency
Combined
Equivalency
Factor
Totals
Value
Totals
Value
Totals
Value
(nanograms)
(nanograms) i
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
2,3,7,8-TCDF
0.1
1.1
0.11
1.5
0.15
2.6
0.26
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
0.05
0.54
0.027
0.54
0.027
1.08
0.054
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
0.5
0.72
0.36
0.59
0.295
1.31
0.655
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
0.1
1.5
0.15
0.83
0.083
2.33
0.233
1,2.3,6,7,8-HxCDF
0.1
0.74
0.074
0.41
0.041
1.15
0.115
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
0.1
0.84
0.084
0.38
0.038
1.22
0.122
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
0.1
0.09
0.009
0.04
0.004
0.13
0.013
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
0.01
2.3
0.023
0.79
0.0079
3.09
0.0309
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
0.01
0.79
0.0079
0.22
0.0022
1.01
0.0101
OCDF
0.001
4.2
0.0042
0.76
0.00076
4.96
0.00496
Total MCDF
N/A
4.2
N/A
28.9
N/A
33.1
0
Total DCDF
N/A
2.2
N/A
13.9
N/A
16.1
0
Total TriCDF
N/A
3
N/A
6.1
N/A
9.1
0
Total TCDF
N/A
6.8
N/A
12.2
N/A
19
0
Total PeCDF
N/A
8.2
N/A
8
N/A
16.2
0
Total HxCDF
N/A
7.8
N/A
4.8
N/A
12.6
0
Total HpCDF
N/A
5.5
N/A
• 1.9
N/A
7.4
0
Front half
Back half
Front half+BacI
Sum (nanograms)
41.9
0.8491
76.56
0.64886
118.46
1.49796
Volume of flue gas collected (dscm) "
3.6258 J
3.6258
J
3.63
Total Furan (nanograms/dscm)
11.56
21.12
32.67
Total Furan @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
20.90
36.50
56.47
TEV Furan (nanograms/dscm)
0.234 ]
0.179
1
0.413
TEV Furan @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
0.424
>
0.309
\
0.714
-------
Furan Toxicity Equivalency Value Calculations for sample WWC-M23-6
Treated Waste Wood Test # 3
Date 8/22/96
Toxicity
Toxicity
Toxicity
Toxicity
Equivalency
Front Half
Equivalency
Back Half
Equivalency
Combined
Equivalency
Factor
Totals
Value
Totals
Value
Totals
Value
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
2,3,7,8-TCDF
0.1
1.1
0.11
1.4
0.14
2.5
0.25
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
0.05
0.65
0.0325
0.51
0.0255
1.16
0.058
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
0.5
0.7
0.35
0.56
0.28
1.26
0.63
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
0.1
1.3
0.13
0.79
0.079
2.09
0.209
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
0.1
0.67
0.067
0.4
0.04
1.07
0.107
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
0.1
0.8
0.08
0.33
0.033
1.13
0.113
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
0.1
0.08
0.008
0.04
0.004
0.12
0.012
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
0.01
2.2
0.022
0.79
0.0079
2.99
0.0299
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
0.01
0.68
0.0068
0.15
0.0015
0.83
0.0083
OCDF
0.001
3.7
0.0037
0.66
0.00066
4.36
0.00436
Total MCDF
N/A
4.8
N/A
25.3
N/A
30.1
0
Total DCDF
N/A
3.1
N/A
12
N/A
15.1
0
Total TriCDF
N/A
3
N/A
5.6
N/A
8.6
0
Total TCDF
N/A
7.5
N/A
11.5
N/A
19
0
Total PeCDF
N/A
8.2
N/A
8
N/A
16.2
0
Total HxCDF
N/A
7.1
N/A
4.2
N/A
11.3
0
Total HpCDF
N/A
5.1
N/A
1.5
N/A
6.6
0
Front half
Back half
Front half+Bac
Sum (nanograms)
42.5
0.81
68.76
0.61156
111.26
1.42156
Volume of flue gas collected (dscm)
4.2691
4.2691
4.27
Total Furan (nanograms/dscm)
9.96
16.11
26.06
Total Furan @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
18.05
27.84
45.04
TEV Furan (nanograms/dscm)
0.190
0.143
0.333
TEV Furan @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
0.344
0.248
0.576
-------
Toxicity Equivalency Value Dloxln and Furan Calculations for sample WWC-M23-1
Untreated Waste Wood Test #1
Date 8/13/96
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1.2.3.6.7.8-HxCDD
1.2.3.7.8.9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
OCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2.3.4.6.7.8-HxCDF
1.2.3.7.8.9-HxCDF
1.2.3.4.6.7.8-HpCDF
1.2.3.4.7.8.9-HpCDF
OCDF
Total MCDD
Total DCDD
Total TriCDD
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
Total MCDF
Total DCDF
Total TriCOF
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
Toxicity
Equivalency
Factor
1
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.01
0.001
0.1
0.05
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.01
0.01
0.001
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Sum (nanograms)
Volume of flue gas collected (dscm)
Total Dioxin and Furan (nanograms/dscm)
Total Dioxin and Furan @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
TEV Dioxin and Furan (nanograms/dscm)
Front Half
Toxicity
Toxicity
Toxicity
Equivalency
Back Half
Equivalency
Combined
Equivalency
Totals
Value
Totals
Value
Totals
Value
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms) (nanograms)
(nanograms) (nanograms)
0.03
0.03
0.05
0.05
0.08
0.08
0.07
0.035
0.15
0.075
0.22
0.11
0.04
0.004
0.1
0.01
0.14
0.014
0.06
0.006
0.15
0.015
0.21
0.021
0.1
0.0I
0.23
0.023
0.33
0.033
0.3
0.003
0.49
0.0049
0.79
0.0079
1.2
0.0012
1.3
0.0013
2.5
0.0025
0.35
0.035
1.5
0.15
1.85
0.185
0.05
0.0025
0.24
0.012
0.29
0.0145
0.18
0.09
0.53
0.265
0.71
0.355
0.25
0.025
0.59
0.059
0.84
0.084
0.1
0.01
0.25
0.025
0.35
0.035
0.15
0.015
0.32
0.032
0.47
0.047
0.04
0.004
0.02
0.002
0.06
0.006
0.25
0.0025
0.46
0.0046
0.71
0.0071
0.04
0.0004
0.08
0.0008
0.12
0.0012
0.15
0.00015
0.22
0.00022
0.37
0.00037
0.02
N/A
0.57
N/A
0.59
0
0.03
N/A
0.82
N/A
0.85
0
0.11
N/A
0.88
N/A
0.99
0
0.31
N/A
4.5
N/A
4.81
0
0.34
N/A
3.6
N/A
3.94
0
0.99
N/A
2.8
N/A
3.79
0
0.65
N/A
1
N/A
1.65
0
0.66
N/A
0.29
N/A
0.95
0
0.05
N/A
12.5
N/A
12.55
0
1.3
N/A
6
N/A
7.3
0
1.9
N/A
9.1
N/A
11
0
1.4
N/A
5.4
N/A
6.8
0
1
N/A
2.8
N/A
3.8
0
0.34
N/A
0.85
N/A
1.19
0
9.25
Front half
Back half
Front half+Back
0.27375
51.33
0.72982
60.58
1.00357
3.4081
3.4081
3.41
2.71
4.49
0.080
15.06
26.03
0.214
17.78
30.72
0.294
TEV Dioxin and Furan @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
0.133
0 370
0.509
-------
Toxicity Equivalency Value Dioxin and Furan Calculations for sample WWC-M23-2
Untreated Waste Wood Test # 2
Date 8/14/96
Toxicity
Equivalency
Factor
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
0.5
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
0.1
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
0.1
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
0.1
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
0.01
OCDD
0.001
2,3,7.8-TCDF
0.1
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
0.05
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
0.5
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
0.1
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
0.1
2,3,4,6,7,6-HxCDF
0.1
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
0.1
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
0.01
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
0.01
OCDF
0.001
Total MCDD
N/A
Total DCDD
N/A
Total TriCDD
N/A
Total TCDD
N/A
Total PeCDD
N/A
Total HxCDD
N/A
Total HpCDD
N/A
Total MCDF
N/A
Total DCDF
N/A
Total TriCDF
N/A
Total TCDF
N/A
Total PeCDF
N/A
Total HxCDF
N/A
Total HpCDF
N/A
Totals
Toxicity
Value
Totals
Toxicity
Value
Totals
Toxicity
Value
(nanograms) (nanograms) (nanograms) (nanograms) (nanograms) (nanograms)
Sum (nanograms)
Volume of flue gas collected (dscm)
Total Dioxin and Furan (nanograms/dscm)
Total Dioxin and Furan @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
TEV Dioxin and Furan (nanograms/dscm)
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.04
0.02
0.04
0.02
0.08
0.03
0.003
0.02
0.002
0.05
0.03
0.003
0.03
0.003
0.06
0.05
0.005
0.04
0.004
0.09
0.15
0.0015
0.1
0.001
0.25
0.61
0.00061
0.24
0.00024
0.85
0.18
0.018
0.4
0.04
0.58
0.03
0.0015
0.07
0.0035
0.1
0.08
0.04
0.13
0.065
0.21
0.12
0.012
0.13
0.013
0.25
0.05
0.005
0.06
0.006
0.11
0.06
0.006
0.07
0.007
0.13
0.02
0.002
0.01
0.001
0.03
0.13
0.0013
0.09
0.0009
0.22
0.03
0.0003
0.01
0.0001
0.04
0.1
0.0001
0.04
0.00004
0.14
0.01
N/A
0.44
N/A
0.45
0.02
N/A
0.39
N/A
0.41
0.05
N/A
0.23
N/A
0.28
0.24
N/A
0.94
N/A
1.18
0.34
N/A
0.43
N/A
0.77
0.25
N/A
0.38
N/A
0.63
0.31
N/A
0.1
N/A
0.41
1.1
N/A
12.5
N/A
13.6
0.03
N/A
4.9
N/A
4.93
0.25
N/A
1.9
N/A
2.15
0.77
N/A
2.5
N/A
3.27
0.54
N/A
1.1
N/A
1.64
0.34
N/A
0.53
N/A
0.87
0.25
N/A
0.13
N/A
0.38
Front half
Back half
4.6
0.13931
26.51
0.18678
31.11
2.7186
2.7186
1.69
9.75
3.03
16.85
0.051
0.069
0.04
0.04
0.005
0.006
0.009
0.0025
0.00085
0058
0005
0.105
0.025
0.011
0.013
0.003
0.0022
0.0004
0.00014
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Front half+Back half
0.32609
2.72
11.44
19.78
0.120
TEV Dioxin and Furan @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
0.092
0.119
0.207
-------
Toxicity Equivalency Value Dloxln and Furan Calculations (or sample WWC-M23-3
Untreated Waste Wood Test # 3
Date 8/15/96
Toxicity
Toxicity
Toxicity
Toxicity
Equivalency Front Half Equivalency Back Half Equivalency Combined Equivalency
Factor
Totals
Value
Totals
Value
Totals
Value
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1.2.3.6.7.8-HxCDD
1.2.3.7.8.9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
OCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2.3.4.6.7.8-HxCDF
1.2.3.7.8.9-HxCDF
1.2.3.4.6.7.8-HpCDF
1.2.3.4.7.8.9-HpCDF
OCDF
Total MCDD
Total DCDD
Total TriCDD
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
Total MCDF
Total DCDF
Total TriCDF
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
Sum (nanograms)
Volume of flue gas collected (dscm)
Total Dioxin and Furan (nanograms/dscm)
Total Dioxin and Furan @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
TEV Dioxin and Furan (nanograms/dscm)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms) (nanograms)
(nanograms) (nanograms)
1
0.02
002
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.04
0.5
0.03
0.015
0.04
0.02
0.07
0.035
0.1
0.02
0.002
0.02
0.002
0.04
0.004
0.1
0.02
0.002
0.01
0.001
0.03
0.003
0.1
0.02
0.002
0.01
0.001
0.03
0.003
0.01
0.11
0.0011
0.04
0.0004
0.15
0.0015
0.001
1.3
0.0013
0.31
0.00031
1.61
0.00161
0.1
0.06
0.006
0.24
0.024
0.3
0.03
0.05
0.02
0001
0.04
0.002
0.06
0.003
0.5
0.02
0.01
0.04
0.02
0.06
0.03
0.1
0.05
0.005
0.06
0.006
0.11
0.011
0.1
0.02
0.002
0.02
0.002
0.04
0.004
0.1
0.03
0.003
0.03
0.003
0.06
0.006
0.1
0.02
0.002
0.02
0.002
0.04
0.004
0.01
0.06
0.0006
0.04
0.0004
0.1
0.001
0.01
0.02
0.0002
0.02
0.0002
0.04
0.0004
0.001
0.07
0.00007
0.02
0.00002
009
0.00009
N/A
0.01
N/A
0.28
N/A
0.29
0
N/A
0.01
N/A
0.22
N/A
0.23
0
N/A
0.03
N/A
0.11
N/A
0.14
0
N/A
0.03
N/A
0.35
N/A
0.38
0
N/A
0.06
N/A
0.12
N/A
0.18
0
N/A
0.1
N/A
0.07
N/A
0.17
0
N/A
0.11
N/A
0.08
N/A
0.19
0
N/A
0.2
N/A
10.4
N/A
10.6
0
N/A
0.02
N/A
3.7
N/A
3.72
0
N/A
0.15
N/A
1.1
N/A
1.25
0
N/A
0.14
N/A
1.6
N/A
1.74
0
N/A
0.07
N/A
0.44
N/A
0.51
0
N/A
0.14
N/A
0.25
N/A
0.39
0
N/A
0.13
N/A
0.05
N/A
0.18
0
Front half
Back half
Front half+BacI
1.27
0.07327
18.79
0.10433
20.06
0.1776
2.872
2.872
2.87
0.44
0.76
0.026
6.54
11.31
0.036
6.98
12.07
0.062
TEV Dioxin and Furan @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
0.044
0.063
0.107
-------
Toxicity Equivalency Value Dloxln and Furan Calculations for sample WWC-M23-4
Trealed Waste Wood Test # 1
Date 8/20/96
Toxicity
Toxicity
Toxicity
Toxicity
Equivalency Front Half
Equivalency
Back Half
Equivalency
Combined
Equivalency
Factor Totals
Value
T otals
Value
Totals
Value
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms) (nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1
0.12
0.12
0.09
0.09
0.21
0.21
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
05
0.59
0.295
0.24
0.12
0.83
0.415
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
01
0.56
0.056
0.13
0 013
0.69
0.069
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
0.1
0.72
0.072
0.16
0.016
0.88
0.088
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
0.1
1.3
0.13
0.22
0.022
1.52
0.152
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
0.01
5.2
0.052
0.28
0,0028
5.48
0.0548
OCDD
0.001
10.2
0.0102
0.07
0.00007
10.27
0.01027
2,3,7,8-TCDF
0.1
1.7
0.17
2
0.2
3.7
0.37
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
0.05
0.77
0.0385
0.59
0,0295
1.36
0.068
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
0.5
1.1
0.55
0.84
0.42
1.94
0.97
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
0.1
2.5
0.25
1.1
0.11
3.6
0.36
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
0.1
1.3
0.13
0.52
0.052
1.82
0.182
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
0.1
1.7
0.17
0.51
0.051
2.21
0.221
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
0.1
0.19
0.019
0.06
0.006
0.25
0.025
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
0.01
4.7
0.047
0.72
0.0072
5.42
0.0542
1,2,3,4.7,8,9-HpCDF
0.01
2
0.02
0.24
0.0024
2.24
0.0224
OCDF
0.001
9.6
0.0096
0.21
0.00021
9.81
0.00981
Total MCDD
N/A
0.04
N/A
0.02
N/A
0.06
0
Total DCDD
N/A
0.11
N/A
0.02
N/A
0.13
0
Total TriCDD
N/A
0.58
N/A
0.04
N/A
0.62
0
Total TCDD
N/A
3.1
N/A
3.5
N/A
66
0
Total PeCDD
N/A
5.8
N/A
3.3
N/A
9.1
0
Total HxCDD
N/A
9
N/A
2.1
N/A
11.1
0
Total HpCDD
N/A
9.7
N/A
0.53
N/A
10.23
0
Total MCDF
N/A
4
N/A
0.01
N/A
4.01
0
Total DCDF
N/A
3.4
N/A
0.03
N/A
3.43
0
Total TriCDF
N/A
3.7
N/A
0.05
N/A
3.75
0
Total TCDF
N/A
9.6
N/A
15.6
N/A
25.2
0
Total PeCDF
N/A
12.6
N/A
11.2
N/A
23.8
0
Total HxCDF
N/A
14.7
N/A
7
N/A
21.7
0
Total HpCDF
N/A
13
N/A
1.5
N/A
14.5
0
Front half
Back half
Front half+Back
Sum (nanograms)
98.93
2.1393
45.11
1.14218
144.04
3.28148
Volume of flue gas collected (dscm)
4.3505
4.3505
4.35
Total Dioxin and Furan (nanograms/dscm)
22.74
10.37
33.11
Total Dioxin and Furan (i
5 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
40.50
17.92
57.23
TEV Dioxin and Furan (nanograms/dscm)
0.492
0.263
0.754
TEV Dioxin and Furan ^
§ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
0.876
0.454
1.304
-------
Toxicity Equivalency Value Dloxin and Furan Calculations for sample WWC-M23-5
Treated Waste Wood Test # 2
Date 8/21/96
Toxicity Toxicity Toxicity
Equivalency Front Half Equivalency Back Half Equivalency
Factor Totals Value Totals Value
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1,2.3,7,8-PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDO
1.2.3.6.7.8-HxCDD
1.2.3.7.8.9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
OCDD
2,3,7,8-TCOF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2.3.4.6.7.8-HxCDF
1.2.3.7.8.9-HxCDF
1.2.3.4.6.7.8-HpCDF
1.2.3.4.7.8.9-HpCDF
OCDF
Total MCDD
Total DCDD
Total TriCDD
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
Total MCDF
Total DCDF
Total TriCDF
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
Sum (nanograms)
Volume of flue gas collected (dscm)
Total Dioxin and Furan (nanograms/dscm)
Total Dioxin and Furan @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
TEV Dioxin and Furan (nanograms/dscm)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
1
0.15
0.15
0.12
0.12
0.5
0.58
0.29
0.3
0.15
0.1
0.44
0.044
0.13
0.013
0.1
0.61
0.061
0.23
0.023
0.1
1.1
0.11
0.32
0.032
0.01
4.2
0.042
0,68
0.0068
0.001
12.9
0.0129
1.4
0.0014
0.1
1.1
0.11
1.5
0.15
0.05
0.54
0.027
0.54
0.027
0.5
0.72
0.36
0.59
0.295
0.1
1.5
0.15
0.83
0.083
0.1
0.74
0.074
0.41
0.041
0.1
0.84
0.084
0.38
0.038
0.1
0.09
0.009
0.04
0.004
0.01
2.3
0.023
0.79
0.0079
0.01
0.79
0.0079
0.22
0.0022
0.001
4.2
0.0042
0.76
0.00076
N/A
0.06
N/A
0.9
N/A
N/A
0.4
N/A
1
N/A
N/A
0.74
N/A
1.5
N/A
N/A
3.8
N/A
5.1
N/A
N/A
6.3
N/A
3.3
N/A
N/A
8.6
N/A
2.9
N/A
N/A
7.8
N/A
1.4
N/A
N/A
4.2
N/A
28.9
N/A
N/A
2.2
N/A
13.9
N/A
N/A
3
N/A
6.1
N/A
N/A
6.B
N/A
12.2
N/A
N/A
8.2
N/A
8
N/A
N/A
7.8
N/A
4.8
N/A
N/A
5.5
N/A
1.9
N/A
Front half
Back half
69.6
1.559
92.66
0.99506
3.6258
3.6258
19.20
34.72
0.430
25.56
44.17
0.274
TEV Dioxin and Furan @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
0.778
0.474
Toxicity
Combined Equivalency
Totals Value
(nanograms) (nanograms)
0.27
0.27
088
0.44
0.57
0.057
0.84
0.084
1.42
0.142
4.88
0.0488
14.3
0,0143
2.6
0.26
1.08
0.054
1.31
0.655
2.33
0.233
1.15
0.115
1.22
0.122
0.13
0.013
3.09
0.0309
1.01
0.0101
4.96
0.00496
0.96
0
1.4
0
2.24
0
8.9
0
9.6
0
11.5
0
9.2
0
33.1
0
16.1
0
9.1
0
19
0
16.2
0
12.6
0
7.4
0
Front half+Back half
162.26 2.55406
3.63
44.75
77.35
0.704
1.218
-------
Toxicity Equivalency Value Dioxin and Furan Calculations (or sample WWC-M23-6
Treated Waste Wood Test # 3
Date 8/22/96
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1.2.3.6.7.8-HxCDD
1.2.3.7.8.9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
OCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2.3.4.6.7.8-HxCDF
1.2.3.7.8.9-HxCDF
1.2.3.4.6.7.8-HpCDF
1.2.3.4.7.8.9-HpCDF
OCDF
Total MCDD
Total DCDD
Total TriCDD
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
Total MCDF
Total DCDF
Tolal TriCDF
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
Sum (nanograms)
Volume of flue gas collected (dscm)
Tolal Dioxin and Furan (nanograms/dscm)
Total Dioxin and Furan @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
TEV Dioxin and Furan (nanograms/dscm)
TEV Dioxin and Furan @ 7% 02 (nanograms/dscm)
Toxicity
Toxicity
Toxicity
Toxicity
Equivalency
Front Half
Equivalency
Back Half
Equivalency
Combined
Equivalency
Factor
Totals
Value
Totals
Value
Totals
Value
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms) (nanograms)
(nanograms)
(nanograms)
1
0.15
0.15
0.13
0.13
0.28
0.28
0.5
0.66
0.33
0.39
0.195
1.05
0.525
0.1
0.45
0.045
0.19
0.019
0.64
0.064
0.1
0.62
0.062
0.21
0.021
0.83
0.083
0.1
1.2
0.12
0.37
0.037
1.57
0.157
0.01
4.1
0.041
0.8
0.008
4.9
0.049
0.001
12.3
0.0123
2.1
0.0021
14.4
0.0144
0.1
1.1
0.11
1.4
0.14
25
0.25
0.05
0.65
0.0325
0.51
0.0255
1.16
0.058
0.5
0.7
0.35
0.56
0.28
1.26
0.63
0.1
1.3
0.13
0.79
0.079
2.09
0.209
0.1
0.67
0.067
0.4
0.04
1.07
0.107
0.1
0.8
0.08
0.33
0.033
1.13
0.113
0.1
0.0B
0008
0.04
0.004
0 12
0.012
0.01
2.2
0.022
0.79
0.0079
2.99
0.0299
0.01
0.68
0.0068
0.15
0.0015
0.83
0.0083
0.001
3.7
0.0037
0.66
0.00066
4.36
0.00436
N/A
0.06
N/A
0.81
N/A
0.87
0
N/A
0.39
N/A
1.5
N/A
1.89
0
N/A
0.79
N/A
1.4
N/A
2.19
0
N/A
4
N/A
5.3
N/A
9.3
0
N/A
6.9
N/A
4.4
N/A
11.3
0
N/A
8.3
N/A
3.2
N/A
11.5
0
N/A
7.6
N/A
1.6
N/A
9.2
0
N/A
4.8
N/A
25.3
N/A
30.1
0
N/A
3.1
N/A
12
N/A
15.1
0
N/A
3
N/A
5.S
N/A
8.6
0
N/A
7.5
N/A
11.5
N/A
19
0
N/A
8.2
N/A
8
N/A
16.2
0
N/A
7.1
N/A
4.2
N/A
11.3
0
N/A
5.1
N/A
1.5
N/A
6.6
0
Front half
70.54
Back half
1.5703
86.97
1.02366
4.2691
4.2691
16.52
20.37
29.96
35.21
0.368
0.240
0.667
0.414
Front half+Bac
157.51 2.59396
4.27
36.90
b3.77
0.608
1.050
-------
APPENDIX V PCB ANALYSIS RESULTS
V-l
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES OF RTP, INC.
Sample Result Summary Ear Project 33672C
Method PCBO Analysis (DB-5)
Page 1
09/26/96
Data File
W1082Q3
W108204
W108205
W108206
Sample ID
TLX M23 Blank
WWC-M23-1
-1,6,2
WWC-M23-2-
1,6,2
WWC-M23-3-
1,6,:
.3
,3
,3
Unics
ng
ng
ng
ng
Analytas
2-Mo
0 .13
3.2
1.3
B
1.5
B
44-Di
a .32
3.9
B
3.5
B
3 .2
B
244-Tr
0.59 PR
3.2
PRB
3.4
PRB
4.1
PRB
2255-T
1.2
3.9
B
4.3
B
6.0
B
3344-T
{0.07}
0.33
B
0 .40
B
0.35
B
23445-Pe
{0.09} PR
0 .24
PRB
{0.24}
PRB
{0.33}
PRB
23344-Pe
0 .17
0.77
B
0.71
S
1.1
B
33445-Pe
(0-2)
0.27
{0.2L}
PR
(0.2)
233445-Hx
0 .08
0.41
B
0.37
B
0.37
B
334455-Hx
(0.3),
{0.13}
(0.3)
(0.3)
2234455-Hp
0.90
3.0
B
2.8
B
5.1
B
22334455-Octa
0.17
0.48
3
0 .38
B
0.72
B
223344556-Nona
(0-5)
(0.5)
(0.4)
(0.5)
~eca
(0.5)
(0.7)
(0.4)
(0.6)
TOTAL MONO
0 .24
12.6
5.0
4.8
TOTAL DI
1.2
47.9
28 .9
28.6
TOTAL TRI
3.5
27.3
22.9
25.6
TOTAL TETRA
6. 6
21.6
26.5
32.0
TOTAL PENTA
5.0
15.6
17.4
27.9
TOTAL HEXA
6.1
22.3
24.1
35.9
TOTAL HEPTA
2.8
13 .0
12.4
22.3
TOTAL OCTA
0 .54
2.5
1.5
2.4
TOTAL NONA
(0.5)
(0.6)
(0.4)
(0.5)
Internal Standards Percent Recovery Summary
(% Rec)
13C6-4-Mo
53 .2
o 3.2
43. 1
54.8
13C12-44-Di
81.9
93 .8
70 .4
79.2
13C12-244-Tr
78.6
85.3
72.5
. 77.5
13C12-3344-T
35.0
89 .1
71.5
75.3
13CI2-33445-Pe
79 .7
85.8
67.3
63 .9
13C12-3 34455-Hx
59 .0
62.9
49 .1
60 .7
13C12-(245)3-Hp
55.4
60.1
54.3
53 .7
13C12-(2345)-0
73 .5
77.5
74.7
73 .7
13C12-D
57.7
57.3
56.2
52.0
Other Standards
Percent Recovery Summary (%
Rec)
13C12-224455-HX
75.2
75.3
72.6
72.7
Other Standards
Percent Recovery Summary (%
Rec)
13C12-33S5-T
95.8
96.5
83 .7
75.4
13C12-22455-Pe
33 .0
82.7
76.7
63 .5
13C12-223445-HX
71.4
70.3
68 .8
58.7
13C12- (235S-)—0
52.3
49.7
49 .4
42.3
Triangla Laboratories, Inc.® Analytical Servicas Division
301 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Printed: 16:51 09/26/S£ _
Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 y 2
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES OF RTP, - INC. Page 2
Sample Result Summary for Project 38672C 09/25/96
Method PCBO Analysis (DB-5)
Data File
W108207
W108208
W108209
W108210
Sample ID
WWC-M23-4-
, 3
1,6,2
WWC-M23-5-
.3
1.6,2
WWC-M23-6-
,3
1, 6,2
WWC-M23-FB-
2,3
-1,6,
Units
ng
ng
ng
zg
Analytes
2-Mo
3.2
4.7
4.5
0.25
B
44-Di
4.8
B
7.4
10 .6
0.69
B
244-Tr
3.9
PRB
8.9
PRB
10.6
PRB
1.3
PRB
2255-T
5. S
B
9.9
5
19.4
B
1.5
B
3344-T
0.67
B
0 .78
B
0.87
B
0.09
B
23445-Pe
0.31
PRB
0.33
PRB
1.1
PRB
£0.14}
PRB
23344-Pe
1.2
B
1.2
B
3 .3
B
0.36
B
33445-Pe
0.25
PR
{0.37}
{0.45}
(0-1)
233445-Hx
0.49 _
B
0.65
B
1.2
B
0.29
B
334455-Ex
(0.1)'
(0.13}
(0.2)
(0-2)
2234455-Hp
4.0
B
6.0
B
12.5
B
5.5
B
22334455-Octa
0.69
3
1.4
B
1.4
B
1.5
B
223344556-Nona
C0.7S}
0.87
0.81
0.30
Deca
{0.31}
1.2
0.93
(0-4)
TOTAL MONO
13 .5
15.3
13 .5
0.59
TOTAL DI
38.8
59.5
70 .5
4.4
TOTAL TRI
24.9
50.7
73 .1.
5.4
TOTAL TETRA
34.8
49.3
101
3.9
TOTAL PENTA
29.9
32.0
106
7.8
TOTAL HEXA
31.2
38.9
111
13 .0
TOTAL HEPTA
19.3
26.0
56.4
15.1
TOTAL CCTA
3.5
6.1
9.9
5.2
TOTAL NONA.
1.0
2.3
2.2
0.30
Internal Standards Percent Recovery Summary (% Rec)
1306-4-Mo
43 .9
51.9
53.9
49.7
13C12-44-Di
75.3
75.7
93.8
77.1
13C12-244-Tr
79.2
69.8
83.4
¦ 74.3
13C12-3344-T
32.4
77.1
92.1
80.1
13C12-33445-Pe
77.1
70.9
79.7
73 .9
13C12-334455-HX
60.0
58.3
65.0
63.1
13C12-(245)3-Hp
54.0
52.2
51.9
53 .8
13C12-(2345)-O
73 .7
70.7
73.2
73.9
13C12-D
56.1
56.1
55.7
63.5
Other Standards
Percent Recovery Summary (%
Rec)
13C12-224455-HX
71.6
77.6
80 .4
75.4
Other Standards
Percent¦Recovery Summary (%
Rec)
13C12-3355-T
94.3
87.4
99.3
82.3
13C12-22455-Pe
75.7
73 .6
87.4
70.0
13012-223445-Hx
56.1
63.3
78.0
74.1
13C12-(2356) -O
50.1
51.5
56.3
57.2
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.® Analytical Services Division
801 Capitola Drive * Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phnne: f9191 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 V-3
Printed: 16:51 09/26/96
•' 2S
-------
TRIANGLE LABORATORIES OF RTP, INC. Page 3
Sample Result Summary for Project 38S72C 09/26/96
Method PCBO Analysis (DB-5)
¦Data File
Sample ID
Units
W10 821-1
TLI LCS
ng
. W108212 . .....
TLI LCSD
ng
Analyses
¦¦ - ¦ - ¦ • - <•••-¦
2-Mo
10 .5
10.0
44-Di
9.5
9.7
244-Tr
3.S
B
8.9
2255-T
20.1
B
20.1
B
3344-T
13 .7
19.6
23445-Pe
21.9
21.9
23344-Pe
20.3
21.2
33445-Pe
13.5
18.5
23 3445-Hx
22. S
21.3
334455-Hx
19.0
19.3
22344S5-Hp
23.5
30.5
22334455-Octa
23.5
29.4
223344556-Nona
46.2
46.3
Deca
46.1
47.3
Internal Standards
Percent Recovery
Summary
(% Rec)
13CS-4-MO
54.4
51.1
13C12-44-Di
67.2
76.9
13C12-244-Tr
64.8
71.1
13C12-3344-T
63 .4
72.7
13C12-33445-Pe
54.2
63 .0
13C12-334455-Hx
53.3
53.9
13C12-(245)3-Hp
60 .2
53 .9
13C12-(2345)-0
74 .2
83 .3
13C12-D
6i'.4
67 . 8 '
Other Standards
Percent Recovery Summary (%
Rec)
13C12-224455-HX
76.3
84.9
Other Standards
Percent Recovery Summary (%
Rec)
13C12-3355-T
73 .8
79 .3
13C12-22455-Pe
67.7
70 .7
13C12-223445-HX
75.8
78 .8
13C12-(2356)-0
62.4
61.5
(Estimated Maximum
Possible
Concentration},
(Detection Limit).
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.® Analytical Services Division
801 Capitola Drive ~ Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 v
Printed: 16:51 09/26/96
-------
Wasta Wood Combustion PCS Calculations
Gas St»c* Stack
Sampta Row Row Flua Gas Emission
Votuma Rata Rata 02 Aiiaiytas Analytas Analytas Analytas Rata
Sampt.# Oats (dscm) (ttartn) (cUcmm) (*) (Total ng) (ng/dsan) (noMieffl O 7% 02) (uortir © 7* 02)
WWC-M23-1 8/11(96
Untreated Wast* Wood # 1
3.4080 685.066 19.40107 125
2-Wo
3.20
44-Oi
3.90
244-Tr
120
2255-T
3.90
3344-T
o.aa
23445-Pa
0.24
23344-P®
0.77
33445-Pa
0.27
233445-Hx
0.41
334455-Hx
0.13
2234455-Hp
3.00
22334455-Octa
0.48
223344556-Nona
0.60
Deca
0.70
Total MONO
12.60
Total Oi
47.90
Total TRI
27.30
Total TETRA
21.60
Total PENTA
15.60
TotaJ HEXA
22.30
Total HEPTA
13.00
Total OCTA
Z50
Total NONA
0.60
0.339 1.554 1.309
1.144 1.094 2204
0.939 1.554 1.309
1.144 1.894 Z204
0.258 0.427 0.497
0.070 0.117 0.136
0.226 0.374 0.435
0.079 0.131 0.153
1120 0.199 0.232
0.038 0.063 0.073
0.880 1.457 1.696
0.141 0.233 0.271
0.176 0*31 0.339
0.205 0.340 0.396
3.697 TfTiB" 7.122
14.055 23.259 27.075
8.011 13.256 15.431
6L338 10.488 12.209
4.577 7.575 8.818
6.543 10.828 12.605
1815 6.313 7.348
0.734 1.214 1.413
0.176 0.291 0.339
WWC-M23-2 8/14/96
Untreated Waste Wood #2
27186 587.284 16.63188 13.2
2-Mo 1.30
44-Oi 3.50
244-Tr 3.40
2255-T 4.30
3344-T 0.40
23445-Pe 0.24
23344-Pe 0.71
33445-Pe 0-21
233445-Hx 0.37
334455-Hx 0.30
2234455-Hp 280
22334455-Octa ' 0.38
223344556-Nona 0.40
Doca 0.40
Total MONO 5.00
Total Di 28.90
Total TRI 2290
Total TETRA 26.50
Total PENTA 17.40
Total HEXA 24.10
Total HEPTA 12.40
Total OCTA 1.50
Total NONA 0.40
0.478 0.857 0.855
1.287 2308 2303
1.251 2242 2237
1.582 2835 2829
0.147 0.264 0.263
0.083 0.158 0.158
0.261 0.468 0.467
0.077 0.138 0.138
0.136 0.244 0.243
0.110 0.198 0.197
1.030 1.846 1.842
0.140 0.251 0.250
0.147 0.264 0.263
0.147 0.264 0.263
1.839 —J.'JUr ¦ 3.290
10.630 19.056 19.016
8.423 15.100 15.068
9.748 17.473 17.437
S.400 11.473 11.449
3.865 15.891 15.858
4.561 8.176 8.159
0.552 0.989 0.987
0.147 0.264 0.263
WWC-M23-3 8/15/96
Untreated Waste Wood # 3
28758 631.188 17.87524 129
2-Mo 1.50
44-Oi 3.20
244-Tr 4.10
2255-T 6.00
3344-T 0.35
23445-Pa 0.33
23344-Pa 1.10
33445-Pa 0.20
233445-Hx 0.37
334455-Hx 0.30
2234455-Hp 5.10
22334455-Octa 0.72
223344556-Nona 0.50
Deca 0.60
Total MONO 4.60
Total Oi 28.60
Total TRI 25.60
Total TETRA 3200
Total PENTA 27.90
Total HEXA 36.90
Total HEPTA 2230
Total OCTA 240
Total NONA 0.50
0.522 0.902 0.967
1.113 1.923 2063
1.426 2464 2643
2086 3.606 3.868
0.122 0.210 0226
0.115 0.198 0.213
0.383 0.661 0.709
0 070 0.120 0.129
0.129 0.222 0.239
0.104 0.180 0.193
1.773 3.065 3.287
0.250 0.433 0.464'
0.174 0.301 0.322
0 209 ' 0.361 0.387
1.669 2885 3.094
9.945 17.189 18.435
8 902 15.386 16.502
11.127 19.232 20.627
9.702 16.768 17.984
12831 22177 23.786
7.754 13.403 14.374
0 835 1.442 1-547
0.174 0.301 0.322
WWC-M23-4 8/20/96
Treated Waste Wood # 1
4.3505 884.522 25.04966 13.1
2-Mo 3.20
44-Oi 4.80
244-Tr 3.90
2255-T 5.60
3344-T 0.67
23445-Pa 0.31
23344-Pe 1.20
33445-Pe 0.26
233445-HX 0.49
334455-HX 0.10
2234455-Hp 4.00
22334455-Octa 0.69
0.736 1.310 1.969
1 103 1.965 2954
0.896 1 597 2400
1.287 2293 3.446
0.154 0.274 0.412
0.071 0.127 0.191
0.276 0.491 0.738
0 060 0.106 0.160
0.113 0.201 0.302
0 023 0.041 0.062
0 919 1.638 2 461
0159 0.282 0.425
\r <
-------
WWC-M23-5
Treated Waste Wood #2
3/21/96
3.6273 742.778 21.03547
13.3
WWC-M23-S
Treated Waste Wood #3
8/22/96
4.2826 911.610 25.81680
13.3
223344556-Nona
Deca
Totai MONO
Total Oi
Total TRI
Totai TETRA
Total PENTA
Total HEXA
Total HEPTA
Total OCTA
Totai NONA
2-Mo
44-Oi
244-Tr
2255-T
3344-T
23445-P®
23344-Pe
33445-P*
233445-HX
334455-Hx
2234455-Hp
22334455-Octa
223344556-Norwi
Deca
Total MONO
Total Di
Total TRI
Total TETRA
Total PENTA
Total HEXA
Total HEPTA
Total OCTA
Total NONA
2-Mo
44-Oi
244-Tr
2255-T
3344-T
23445-Pa
23344-Pe
33445-P®
233445-Hx
334455-Hx
2234455-Hp
22334455-Octa
223344556-Nona
TotaUAONO
Total Di
Total TRI
Total TETRA
Total PENTA
Total HEXA
Total HEPTA
Total OCTA
Total NONA
0.75
0.175
0.311
0.468
0.81
0.186
0.332
0.498
13.60
3.126
5.568
8.369
38.80
8.919
15.885
23.875
24.90
5.723
10.194
15.322
34.30
7.999
14.248
21.414
29.90
6.373
12242
18.399
31.20
7.172
12774
19.199
19.30
4.436
7.902
11.876
3.50
0.605
1.433
2154
1.00
0.230
0.409
0.615
4.70
1.296
2344
2958
7.40
2.040
3.690
4.657
8.90
2454
4.438
5.601
9.90
2729
4.937
6.231
0.78
0.215
0.389
0.491
0.33
0.091
0.165
0.208
1.20
0.331
0.598
0.755
0.37
0.102
0.185
0.233
G.65
Q.179
0.324
0.409
0.18
0.050
0.090
0.113
6.00
1.654
2992
3.776
1.40
0.386
0.698
0.681
0.87
0.240
0.434
0.548
1.20
0.331
0.598
0.755
15.30
4.218
7.629
9.629
69.50
19.160
34.657
43.741
60.70
16.734
30.269
38.203
49.30
13.591
24.584 .
31.028
32.00
8.822
15.957
20.140
38.90
10.724
19.396
24.483
26.00
7.168
12965
16.364
6.10
1.682
3.042
3.839
2.30
0.634
1.147
1.448
4.50
1.056
1.919
2973
10.60
2487
4.521
7.004
10.60
2487
4.521
7.004
19.40
4.551
8.275
12818
0.87
0.204
0.371
0.575
1.10
0.258
0.469
0.727
3.30
0.774
1.408
2180
0.45
0.106
0.192
0.297
1.20
0.282
0.512
0.793
0.20
0.047
0.085
0.132
12.50
2932
5.332
8.259
1.40
0.328
0.597
0.925
0.81
0.190
0.345
0.535
0.93
0.218
0.397
0.614
13.60
3.191
5.801
8.986
70.50
16.539
30.071
46.581
73.10
17.149
31.180
48.299
101.00
23.694
43.081
66.733
106.00
24.867
45.214
70.036
111.00
26.040
47.346
73.340
56.40
13.231
24.057
37.265
9.90
2323
4.223
6.541
2.20
0.516
0.938
1.454
WWC-M23-FB 8/22/96
Field Blank
NA NA NA NA
2-MO 0-25
44-Oi 0.69
244-Tr 1-30
2255-T 1.50
3344-T 0.09
23445-Pe 0.14
23344-Pe 0.36
33445-Pe 0-10
233445-HX 0.29
334455-Hx 0.20
2234455-Hp 5.50
22334455-Octa 1.60
223344556-Nona 0.30
Daca 0.40
Total MONO 0.59
Total Di 4.40
Total TRI 6.40
Total TETRA 8.90
Total PENTA 7.80
Total HEXA 13.00
Total HEPTA 16.10
Total OCTA 5.20
Total NONA 0.30
V-6
------- |