EPA/600/B-18/240 I September 2018
www.epa.gov/homeland-security-research
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
&EPA
The Use of Combustion Process
Modification to Capture Cesium from
Combustion of Contaminated Biomass
Office of Research and Development
Homeland Security Research Program
-------
This page left intentionally blank
-------
EPA/600/R-18/240
September 2018
The Use of Combustion Process
Modification to Capture Cesium from
Combustion of Contaminated Biomass
by
Paul M. Lemieux
Sang Don Lee
William P. Linak
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Project Officer: Paul M. Lemieux
Office of Research and Development
Homeland Security Research Program
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
-------
Disclaimer
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through its Office of Research
and Development funded and managed the research described herein under
contract EP-C-09-027 with ARCADIS and contract EP-C-15-008 with Jacobs. It has
been subjected to the Agency's review and has been approved for publication.
Note that approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views
of the Agency. Any mention of trade names, products, or services does not imply
an endorsement by the U.S. Government or EPA. The EPA does not endorse any
commercial products, services, or enterprises. The contractor role did not include
establishing Agency policy.
For questions, contact
Paul M Lemieux
US EPA
Office of Research and Development
National Homeland Security Research Center
109 TW Alexander Drive E343-06
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
919-541-0962
lemieux.paul@epa.gov
-------
Table of Contents
Disclaimer ii
List of Tables v
List of Figures vi
Acronyms and Abbreviations vii
Acknowledgments x
Executive Summary xi
1.0 Introduction 1
2.0 Experimental 3
2.1 Powderized Biomass Tests in Down-Fired Vertical Tunnel Combustor 3
2.1.1 Combustor Description 3
2.1.2 Biomass Description 4
2.1.3 Sorbent Description 5
2.1.4 Instrumentation 6
2.1.5 Experimental Approach 7
2.1.6 Doped Biomass and Sorbent Preparation 7
2.1.7 Sampling and Analytical Procedures 8
2.1.8 Test Description 8
2.2 Pelletized Biomass Tests in Rotary Kiln Incinerator Simulator 9
2.2.1 Combustor Description 9
2.2.2 Biomass Description 10
2.2.3 Sorbent Description 11
2.2.4 Gas Analysis Equipment 12
2.2.5 Experimental Approach 12
3.0 Results 15
3.1 Results from Powderized Biomass Tests in Down-Fired Vertical Tunnel Combustor 15
3.2 Results from Pelletized Biomass Tests in Rotary Kiln Incinerator Simulator 17
4.0 Discussion 20
5.0 Quality Control Report 21
5.1 Quality Control 21
5.2 Calibrations 21
5.3 QA Assessments and Corrective Action 22
5.3.1 Elemental Analysis of MOUDI substrates 22
5.3.2 CEM Calibrations 23
5.3.3 Rotary Kiln Incinerator Simulator 23
5.3.3 Biomass Feeder 23
5.3.4 Sorbent Injection 23
iii
-------
6.0 Conclusions 24
7.0 References 24
Appendix A: Analysis of Corncob Flour 26
Appendix B. Analysis of Pine Flour 30
Appendix C. Analysis of Biomass Pellets 33
Appendix D. Particle Size Analysis of Sorbent for Rotary Kiln Tests 36
Appendix E: ICP-MS Results for MOUDI Filters 38
iv
-------
List of Tables
Table 1. Properties of Biomass Flour Used in Tests (as received) 5
Table 2. Properties of Kaolinite Powder Sorbent 6
Table 3. Test Matrix and Samples to be Acquired 7
Table 4. Properties of Biomass Pellets Used in Tests (as received) 11
Table 5. Test Matrix 14
Table 6. CEM Results 18
Table 7. ICP-MS Analysis Results from Pelletized Biomass/Sorbent Tests in RKIS 18
Table 8. Particle Size Fractions Caught on MOUDI Stages 19
Table 9. CEM Calibration Criteria 22
v
-------
List of Figures
Figure 1. Vertical-Fired Refractory-Lined Laboratory-Scale Furnace 4
Figure 2. Biomass Feed System 5
Figure 3. Sorbent Injection System 6
Figure 4. Rotary Kiln Incinerator Simulator 9
Figure 5. Continuous Feed Vibration System a) Diagram; and b) Photograph 11
Figure 6. SCC Temperature Profile Results 14
Figure 7. Particle Size Distributions of Cs-Doped Biomass Flour 15
Figure 8. Particle Size Distributions of Cs-Doped Biomass Flour + Sorbent 16
Figure 9. Particle Size Distributions of Cs-Doped Biomass with and without Sorbent 17
Figure 10. Cesium Particle Partitioning with and without Sorbent Injection 19
vi
-------
Acronyms and Abbreviations
°C Degrees Celsius
°F Degrees Fahrenheit
Hm Micrometer(s)
Al Aluminum
Ba Barium
Br Bromine
Btu British thermal unit(s)
C Carbon
Ca Calcium
CEM Continuous Emission Monitor
CI Chlorine
cm Centimeter(s)
CMAD EPA CBRN Consequence Management Advisory Division
Cs Cesium
CsCI Cesium chloride
D Diameter
DAS Data acquisition system
EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
ESP Electrostatic Precipitator
Fe Iron
FGCS Flue gas cleaning system
g Gram(s)
GE General Electric
GLI Galbraith Laboratories, Inc.
h Hour(s)
vii
-------
H Hydrogen
ICP-MS Inductively Coupled Plasma - Mass Spectrometry
IFRF International Flame Research Foundation
JTI Jacobs Technology, Inc.
K Potassium
kg Kilogram(s)
kW Kilowatt(s)
L Length
L Liter(s)
LPM Liters per minute
lb Pound(s)
m Meter(s)
mg Milligram(s)
Mg Magnesium
min Minute(s)
Mn Manganese
MOUDI Micro-Orifice Uniform Deposit Impactor
Na Sodium
ng Nanogram(s)
nm Nanometer(s)
NHSRC EPA National Homeland Security Research Center
NRMRL EPA National Risk Management Research Laboratory
O Oxygen
OEM EPA Office of Emergency Management
OLEM EPA Office of Land and Emergency Management
ORD EPA Office of Research and Development
P Phosphorus
viii
-------
PM Particulate matter
ppm Part(s) per million
PSD Particle size distribution
QA Quality Assurance
QC Quality Control
RDD Radiological Dispersal Device
RKIS Rotary Kiln Incinerator Simulator
S Sulfur
SCC Secondary Combustion Chamber
scfm Standard cubic feet per minute
Si Silicon
Sr Strontium
XRF X-Ray Fluorescence
Zn Zinc
ix
-------
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to specially acknowledge Larry Virtaranta, Preston Burnette and Daniel Janek of Jacobs
Technology, Inc. (JTI). Larry oversaw the project operations, Preston assisted with troubleshooting the rotary kiln
incinerator simulator (RKIS)/flue gas cleaning system (FGCS) and was the predominant person assisting with
testing (biomass feeder, sorbent injection, micro-orifice uniform deposit impactor (MOUDI) recovery). Daniel
operated the FGCS and prepped/weighed MOUDI substrates. Jacob Cansler of JTI assisted with biomass feeder
and temperature profile. Dean Smith of ARCADIS supervised the X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) laboratory and
advised on data reduction for the powderized biomass experiments. The authors would also like to acknowledge
Eric Morris of ARCADIS who operated the XRF analytical equipment and Garrett Wiley of ARCADIS who operated
the sorbent injection system for the powderized biomass tests.
EPA Product Team
Paul Lemieux (EPA/ORD/NHSRC)
Sang Don Lee (EPA/ORDNHSRC)
Paul Kudarauskas (EPA/OLEM/OEM/CMAD)
The authors would also like to acknowledge the following individuals for performing the technical editing,
technical reviews, and the quality assurance review:
Joan Bursey (EPA/NHSRC Senior Environmental Employee)
Ramona Sherman (EPA/ORD/NHSRC)
Peter Kariher (EPA/ORD/NRMRL)
Shannon Serre (EPA/OLEM/OEM/CMAD)
x
-------
Executive Summary
In the aftermath of a wide-area radiological contamination incident in an urban setting, there is the potential for
the generation of significant quantities of contaminated biomass waste. For example, the 2011 nuclear power
plant accident at the Fukushima Daiichi plant in Japan resulted in an estimated 7.8 million cubic meters of
combustible waste, most of which was biomass (Osako, 2015). These wastes are likely candidates for
incineration as a means of volume reduction, due to the costs associated with disposal of low-level radioactive
waste. Cesium (Cs), an alkali metal element, is a radionuclide that might possibly be used in a radiological
dispersal device or may be the predominant long-term radionuclide contaminant from a nuclear power plant
accident. Cs presents problematic behavior in combustion systems due to its volatility and solubility in water.
Many wastes and fossil fuels contain trace metallic constituents. Although high-temperature combustion or
incineration systems cannot destroy the elemental metal constituents, these environments may induce metal
transformations. These transformations may exacerbate difficulties in controlling the radionuclides of interest
because many of the metal species, including Cs, vaporize readily within the combustion environments. This
saturated vapor will subsequently nucleate and condense downstream of the flame, forming a fume of
submicron (i.e., aerodynamic diameter < 1 micrometer [j-im]) aerosol with a mean volume aerodynamic
diameter between 100 and 200 nanometers (nm). These condensed particles, because of their small size, are
difficult to collect in pollution control systems, particularly those using an electrostatic precipitator. Emissions of
particulate-bound radioactive isotopes such as 137Cs from combustion systems are highly undesirable (Parajuli et
al., 2013). Chlorinated metal species that are collected often exhibit increased volatility (Yang et al., 2002).
Moreover, chlorinated and sulfated metals may exhibit increased water solubility and subsequent leachability
with disposal in landfill environments.
The objective of this research was to:
• Examine the behavior and transformations of biomass-bound Cs in an incinerator environment; and
• Determine whether combustion modifications, including sorbent injection into the post-combustion
zone of practical incinerators and combustors, could be used to convert biomass-bound Cs into easily
collected forms.
xi
-------
1.0 Introduction
In the aftermath of a wide-area radiological contamination incident in an urban setting, there is the potential for
the generation of significant quantities of contaminated biomass waste. For example, the 2011 nuclear power
plant accident at the Fukushima Daiichi plant in Japan resulted in an estimated 7.8 million cubic meters of
combustible waste, most of which was biomass (Osako, 2015). These wastes are likely candidates for
incineration as a means of volume reduction, due to the costs associated with disposal of low-level radioactive
waste. Cesium (Cs), an alkali metal element, is a radionuclide that might possibly be used in a radiological
dispersal device (RDD) or may be the predominant long-term radionuclide contaminant from a nuclear power
plant accident, and Cs presents problematic behavior in combustion systems due to its volatility and solubility in
water. Many wastes and fossil fuels contain trace metallic constituents. Although high-temperature combustion
or incineration systems cannot destroy the elemental metal constituents, these environments may induce metal
transformations. These transformations may exacerbate difficulties in controlling the radionuclides of interest
because many of the metal species, including Cs, vaporize readily within the combustion environments. This
saturated vapor will subsequently nucleate and condense downstream of the flame, forming a fume of
submicron (i.e., aerodynamic diameter < 1 micrometer [j-im]) aerosol with a mean volume aerodynamic
diameter between 100 and 200 nanometers (nm). These condensed particles, because of their small size, are
difficult to collect in pollution control systems, particularly those using an electrostatic precipitator (ESP).
Emissions of particulate-bound radioactive isotopes such as 137Cs from combustion systems are highly
undesirable (Parajuli et al., 2013). Chlorinated metal species that are collected often exhibit increased volatility
(Yang et al., 2002). Moreover, chlorinated and sulfated metals may exhibit increased water solubility and
subsequent leachability after disposal in landfill environments.
Past work examining the behavior of Cs in natural gas-fired combustion systems has shown that Cs could be
reactively scavenged onto dispersed kaolinite powders (Yoo et al., 2005). By adsorbing Cs onto larger (2-10 pim)
kaolinite sorbent particles, the Cs can be captured much more effectively by conventional particulate control
devices such as ESPs or fabric filters, which are very effective at capturing particulate matter (PM) with sizes
greater than 1 pim. Further, Cs chemisorbed onto kaolinite may well resist leaching in landfill environments. This
initial work found that there was an optimal temperature between 1400 and 1500 kelvins (K) where maximum
sorption (approaching 80%) on the kaolinite occurs. The presence of chlorine (CI) was found to inhibit Cs
sorption.
Subsequent work showed that this mechanism was still valid in a combustion environment using biomass as the
fuel (Lemieux et al., 2013). In these tests, corncob flour was used as 50% of the fuel load in the same pilot-scale
combustor used in previous studies (Yoo et al., 2005), operating under the same conditions using a similar
kaolinite sorbent material. Approximately 65% of the Cs was captured onto the sorbent particles in spite of the
elevated chlorine (CI), sodium (Na) and potassium (K) present in a biomass combustion environment (Jenkins et
al., 1998). Na and K, as alkali metals, behave similarly to Cs and could potentially compete with Cs for active sites
on the sorbent particles. In addition, cesium chloride (CsCI) is a common Cs species that could be used in an RDD
(Musolino et al., 2011; Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2010; U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 2007),
and some biomass may contain varying levels of CI (Jenkins et al., 1998), which may inhibit sorption of Cs onto
the sorbent particles.
The objective of this research was to:
• Examine the behavior and transformations of biomass-bound Cs in an incinerator environment; and
• Determine whether combustion modifications, including sorbent injection into the post-combustion
zone of practical incinerators and combustors, could be used to convert biomass-bound Cs into easily
collected forms.
1
-------
Pertinent mechanisms were inferred by:
• Examining metal aerosol properties (particle size distribution [PSD] and chemistry) as a function of
fuel/waste composition and incinerator operating parameters;
• Determining how sorbent injection modifies the submicron size distribution of the metal aerosol in the
exhaust; and
• Interpreting detailed morphological and chemical analyses of size-segregated particulate matter
extracted from the exhaust.
The successful demonstration of the Cs capture in a biomass combustion environment led to the question of
whether this degree of success would be maintained when other biomass types were being burned due to the
variation in the amounts of different alkali metals and chlorine. Due to the prevalence of pine as a common type
of tree found in many urban areas, a similar set of tests was performed in a combustion system that used finely
ground pine wood (pine flour) as the biomass fuel. After those experiments, another set of experiments was
performed using pelletized hardwood biomass in a pilot-scale rotary kiln incinerator simulator (RKIS) system.
This report presents those results.
2
-------
2.0 Experimental
The experiments were performed in two distinct series:
• Experiments on a down-fired vertical tunnel combustor burning a mixture of natural gas and powderized
biomass while injecting kaolinite sorbent near the combustor exit;
o with powderized corncob as the biomass;
o with powderized pine as the biomass; and
• Experiments on a rotary kiln incinerator simulator (RKIS) burning a mixture of natural gas and pelletized
oak biomass while injecting kaolinite sorbent in the secondary combustion chamber.
2.1 Powderized Biomass Tests in Down-Fired Vertical Tunnel Combustor
2.1.1 Combustor Description
The first set of experiments was performed using a vertical-fired refractory-lined laboratory-scale furnace,
located at EPA's research facility in Research Triangle Park, NC. This experimental system was used previously
(Yoo et al., 2005) (see Figure 1). Normally, this furnace operates solely on a natural gas flame. The natural gas
fuel was supplemented with very finely ground biomass to utilize the same combustion system and combustion
conditions similar to the conditions that successfully demonstrated sorbent injection to control Cs from a natural
gas combustion system. The furnace is currently configured with the following components, which are described
below:
• Combustion chamber;
• Flame safety interlock system;
• Natural gas supply system;
• Biomass supply system;
• Sorbent injection system; and
• Data acquisition system.
The furnace is an 82 kilowatt (kW) (280,000 British thermal units/hour [Btu/h]) rated vertically-fired combustor
equipped with an International Flame Research Foundation (IFRF)-type variable-air swirl burner and is discussed
elsewhere (Linak et al., 2004; Linak et al., 1994). The furnace is designed to simulate the time and temperature
characteristics of a variety of incineration devices. The primary use of the furnace is to examine hazardous air
pollutants like those produced in boilers and waste incinerators. The vertical part of the furnace spans 457
centimeters (cm) (15 feet) and consists of a burner section with a 52 cm (20.5-inch) inside diameter that
simulates the near-burner zone aerodynamics of a variety of natural gas and fuel oil flames, and a 26.7 cm (10.5-
inch) inside diameter section that extends 305 cm (10 feet). The furnace then turns into a 26.7 cm (10.5-inch)
inside diameter horizontal duct to allow for additional sampling locations. The furnace is refractory-lined and
has evenly spaced sampling ports that span the full length of the furnace to facilitate gas and aerosol sampling
as well as temperature measurements. The exhaust exits the furnace vertically with additional sampling ports
located along the insulated 21 cm (8.25-inch) diameter stainless steel duct.
3
-------
Natural gas
Combustion
air
Kaolinite
sorbent
injection
MOUDI .
sampling
Biomass with
Aqueous CsCI
T M Exhaust to
air pollution
control system
-1603
-1594
-1559
-1531
-1495
-1449
-1442
-1394
-1380
-1328
-1292
-1246
> Method 5
CEMs
Figure 1. Vertical-Fired Refractory-Lined Laboratory-Scale Furnace
2.1.2 Biomass Description
The furnace was designed to operate on natural gas and liquid fuels but was modified for powdered biomass.
Normally, a biomass-fired combustor would burn biomass that had undergone only moderate size reduction.
However, since the combustor used for these experiments normally operated on natural gas only, the
experiments required the biomass to be very finely ground to minimize the need for major equipment retrofits.
For these experiments, approximately 50% of the fuel load (by heating value) was natural gas and 50% of the
fuel load was powdered biomass material. The biomass used for the initial set of tests was corncob flour (Mt.
Pulaski #100; The Andersons, Inc., Maumee, OH, predominantly < 150 pim in particle diameter), and the biomass
used for the second set of tests was pine flour (#70 Pine Wood Flour; Composition Materials Company, Milford,
CT, predominantly < 212 pim in particle diameter). The pine flour was evaluated for feedability and
combustibility by Galbraith Laboratories (GLI) (Knoxville, TN) and the presence of potentially confounding
elements (e.g., Na, K) (Jenkins et al., 1998) via X-ray fluorescence (XRF) in the EPA's X-Ray Laboratory in Research
Triangle Park, NC, prior to initiation of the tests. Table 1 lists the properties of the corncob and pine flour used in
the experiments. Of particular note is the lower amount of CI and K in the softwood flour. The material was co-
fired into the IFRF burner using a screw-type feeder with a loss-in-mass controller (see Figure 2) (K-Tron Model #
KT926; Pitman, NJ) with a nominal feed rate of 4.5 kilograms/hour (kg/h) (10 pounds/hour [lb/h]). The
powderized biomass was fed through a custom injection nozzle fabricated from two concentric tubes and
installed in the center of the burner. Biomass, transported by air, was blown through the center tube with
natural gas supplied through the annulus between the inner and outer tubes.
4
-------
Table 1. Properties of Biomass Flour Used in Tests (as received)
WD-XRF Analysis
Pine Flour
#100 Corncob Flour
Cellulose
99.815%
98.436%
Hydrogen (H)
6.205%
6.119%
Carbon (C)
44.364%
43.751%
Oxygen (O)
49.246%
48.566%
Sodium (Na)
ND
ND
Magnesium (Mg)
0.017%
0.036%
Aluminum (Al)
ND
0.008%
Silicon (Si)
0.005%
0.101%
Phosphorus(P)
0.001%
0.047%
Sulfur (S)
0.005%
0.030%
Chlorine (CI)
0.036%
0.363%
Potassium (K)
0.032%
0.950%
Calcium (Ca)
0.077%
0.021%
Iron (Fe)
ND
0.005%
Manganese (Mn)
0.007%
ND
Zinc (Zn)
0.001%
0.001%
Bromine (Br)
ND
0.001%
Strontium (Sr)
0.001%
ND
Barium (Ba)
ND
ND
ND - Not Detected
Figure 2. Biomass Feed System
2.1.3 Sorbent Description
Previous testing (Yoo et al., 2005) used kaolinite sorbent, and the kaolinite was effective at capturing Cs in a
solely natural gas-fired system. Kaolinite is also widely available and inexpensive, averaging approximately
$160/ton (Statistica.com, 2017). Kaolinite powder (Burgess No. 40; Burgess Pigment, Sandersville, GA; see Table
2) was injected into a port of the furnace using a K-Tron Model KCLKT20 Twin Screw Compact Loss-ln-Weight
Feeder (Pitman, NJ) with a 12-liter (L) (3.2-gallon) hopper (Figure 3). Sorbent was metered from the hopper by
5
-------
the rotation of the screws for a given set point. The feeder was equipped with a horizontal agitator and a
vertical discharge with a flexible discharge boot. The sorbent metered from the screws entered a conical section
where compressed air transported the powdered sorbent through a water-cooled probe into the furnace
approximately two meters (m) downstream of the flame.
Table 2. Properties of Kaolinite Powder Sorbent
Typical Physical Properties
Typical Chemical Properties
GE Brightness
85.0 %
Loss on Ignition
13.7-14.1 %
325 Mesh Residue
0.15 %
Silica (Si02)
44.8-45.3 %
Average Particle Diameter
(SediGraph)
1.3 nm
Alumina (Al203)
37.5-39.7%
Free Moisture
1.0 %
Iron Oxide (Fe203)
Trace
Specific Gravity
2.63
Titanium Dioxide (Ti02)
1.35-2.27%
Refractive Index
1.56
pH (20% Solids)
5.3
Figure 3. Sorbent Injection System
2.1.4 Instrumentation
The furnace was equipped with instrumentation to monitor combustor operating conditions. Temperature was
measured at several locations inside the furnace using ceramic-shielded Type R thermocouples (for detailed
temperature profile measurements) or unshielded Type K thermocouples (for routine monitoring of operating
conditions). Continuous emission monitors (CEMs) recorded 02, C02 (U.S. EPA, 1989), CO (U.S. EPA, 1996b), and
NOx (U.S. EPA, 1990) levels in the transition duct between the furnace and the facility's Flue Gas Cleaning System
(FGCS). Air and gas mass flow meters measured combustion air and natural gas flow rates.
Temperature, air and gas flow rates, and CEM measurements were recorded by the furnace's data acquisition
system (DAS). The DAS was comprised of Measurement Computing's (Norton, MA) Personal Daq hardware
interfaced with a desktop PC running Measurement Computing's Personal DaqView software. Analog voltage
signals from the air and gas mass flow meters, thermocouples, and CEM monitors were digitized by the DAS,
displayed to the desktop monitor in real time, and recorded in text format, which was later read into an MS
6
-------
Excel spreadsheet for post-processing and data analysis.
2.1.5 Experimental Approach
During the tests, the firing rate was determined by the combination of natural gas and biomass feed and was set
for a nominal firing rate of 51.1 kW (175,000 Btu/h). For all tests, the furnace was operated with a nominal 20%
excess air and a stack 02 target of 3.5%. The test matrix and samples that were acquired are shown in Table 3.
Table 3. Test Matrix and Samples to be Acquired
Test
Condition
Natural
Gas
Biomass Feed
Cs Doping
Sorbent
Feeding
Gas Species
Concentrations
Particle
Analysis
1
On
Off*
Off
Off
CEMs
NA
2
On
On
Off
Off
CEMs
MOUDI
3
On
On
On
Off
CEMs
MOUDI
4
On
On
On
On
CEMs
MOUDI
NA - not applicable
* - natural gas was increased to maintain 51.1 kW firing rate
MOUDI - Micro-Orifice Uniform Deposit Impactor
The effect of sorbent injection on the behavior and transformation of Cs-bound biomass waste was determined
by doping the biomass with aqueous cesium chloride prior to feeding the biomass into the furnace operating at
a constant load of approximately 51.1 kW (175,000 Btu/h), with a feed rate of corncob flour of 4.4 kg/h (10
Ib/h). The natural gas and combustion air feed rates were adjusted to maintain the desired level of excess air
and the desired temperature profile. Figure 1 shows the temperature profile of the furnace for these tests.
2.1.6 Doped Biomass and Sorbent Preparation
The concentration of the Cs that was artificially placed onto the biomass was initially based on evaluation of
instrument detection limits of XRF and Cs deposition on different impactor stages and sampling times used in
the previous work (Yoo et al., 2005). This analysis suggested a minimum Cs target concentration in the
combustion gas effluent of 844 ng/L. The biomass was prepared by spraying a small amount of an aqueous
solution of CsCI onto the material while it was being agitated in a portable cement mixer. Based on the desired
Cs concentration in the flue gases, the target concentration of Cs in the biomass was 55.6 mg Cs per kg of
biomass flour (55.6 ppm). The doped biomass flour was prepared by mixing 641 mg of CsCI with 1 L of deionized
water and pouring 0.5 L of this solution into 0.45 kg (1 lb) of biomass flour, then adding that mixture to the
remaining portion of a 4.5 kg (10 lb) bucket of biomass flour and mixing thoroughly using a cement mixer. The
concentration of stable 133Cs used in this study may be significantly higher (perhaps by orders of magnitude)
than the contamination level expected in an actual RDD incident. However, the chemical properties of 133Cs are
identical to the chemical properties of radioactive 134/137Cs. Hence, the results from using 133Cs are sufficient to
assess the concept of using kaolinite powders as Cs sorbents during biomass incineration. The higher
concentrations are necessary to overcome detection limitations associated with using the less sensitive XRF
method as opposed to using highly sensitive gamma detectors that could be used to detect radioactive Cs
isotopes.
The primary variables of interest were: 1) the molar ratio of kaolinite in the sorbent to the Cs in the biomass; 2)
the molar ratio of Cs in the biomass to the other alkali metals and trace constituents (i.e., Na, K, CI) in the
biomass; and 3) the concentration of Cs in the biomass. The sorbent injection temperature was set at the
optimal temperature for Cs capture as observed in previous testing on the furnace with Cs (Yoo et al., 2005).
For these initial tests, high kaolinite feed rates exceeding the levels of K in the corncob flour were chosen. To
accomplish this high feed rate, 50 g/min of kaolinite was injected into the furnace, which represented a 10:1
7
-------
molar ratio of kaolinite to K. The large excess of K relative to Cs resulted in a molar ratio of kaolinite to cesium of
approximately 6700:1.
2.1.7 Sampling and Analytical Procedures
Metal speciation was determined by XRF analysis of size-segregated PM extracted from the exhaust. Size-
segregated samples were taken using a Micro-Orifice Uniform Deposit Impactor (MOUDI) (MSP Corporation,
Shoreview, MN)(Applied Physics, 2013). The MOUDI is a cascade impactor designed for high concentration
aerosols and provides very sharp cut points, very low bounce response, digital on/off timer controls, and flow
meters. Triplicate MOUDI samples were collected for each experimental condition except when otherwise
noted.
The furnace is equipped with several sampling ports located along the axis of the combustor for emissions
sampling (see Figure 1). All sampling locations are sufficient in length and free of flow disturbances so that PM
can be sampled. There was approximately 2 m of distance between the injection port and the sampling port,
representing approximately 1.3 seconds (s) of residence time. The flue gas velocity was measured with a pitot
tube and a micromanometer (U.S. EPA, 1996a). This flue gas velocity value was used to determine the sample
flows required to maintain isokinetic conditions at the end of the probe.
The MOUDI samples were acquired from the main duct using an air-cooled stainless-steel dilution probe.
Nitrogen dilution of the sample using a dilution probe was performed to quench aerosol growth and prevent
water condensation. The dilution flow was controlled by a mass flow controller, and the total sample flow was
measured with a dry gas meter and an orifice plate. The mass flow controller was calibrated by the EPA
Metrology Laboratory with a Gilibrator bubble flow meter (Sensidyne, St. Petersburg, FL), and the dry gas meter
was calibrated with a wet test meter. All tubing from the probe to the impactor was of minimal length and
constructed of conductive silicon tubing to minimize particle loss due to electrostatic deposition.
The MOUDI Model 110 is a 10-stage, 30 L/min (1.06 standard cubic feet per minute [scfm]) inertial cascade
impactor capable of measuring PSDs between 0.056 and 10 pim. The impactor is housed inside a cabinet that
continuously rotates the impactor nozzle plates relative to the impaction surfaces. The nozzles are staggered in
a pattern that produces a uniform layer of particulate when rotated. The uniform deposition allows more
particulate to be collected without adversely affecting the critical distance between the nozzles and impaction
surface and allows the impactor substrates to be analyzed using XRF.
Substrates used in the MOUDI were 47 mm polycarbonate membrane material. To help deter particle bounce,
the substrates were coated with Apiezon Type-L vacuum grease (M&l Materials, Manchester, UK) diluted 20 to 1
with hexane and applied with an airbrush. The airbrush used nitrogen from a cylinder. After coating, the
substrates were placed in an 85-degree Centigrade (°C) (185 degrees Fahrenheit (°F)) oven for one hour. After
cooling, the substrates were placed in a vacuum desiccator for 24 hours. After collection, the polycarbonate
membranes were placed on Petri slides and stored in a desiccator until they were analyzed by XRF for Al, Na, K,
CI, and Cs in the EPA's X-Ray Laboratory in Research Triangle Park, NC.
2.1.8 Test Description
Once the optimal biomass/natural gas combination was determined, the furnace was operated until
temperatures stabilized and a temperature profile of the furnace was acquired using a ceramic shielded R-type
thermocouple (Omega, Norwalk, CT). A location with temperatures between 1400 and 1500 kelvins (K) (2060 -
2240 °F) was identified to be used later to inject the kaolinite sorbent (see Figure 1).
A background experiment firing only natural gas was performed (Test Condition 1). The particulate sample was
taken from the duct with an air-cooled stainless-steel nozzle/tube and was diluted with nitrogen to dilute the
8
-------
sample and quench aerosol growth. The MOUDI was used to collect size-classified samples and determine
particle distributions. All substrates from the MOUDI were analyzed using XRF. Elements of interest included Na,
K, and Cs to characterize the alkali metals, CI to examine possible interference, and Al to track the kaolinite
sorbent.
The next set of experiments involved undoped powderized biomass combustion without sorbent injection (Test
Condition 2). Using the firing rate that was previously determined, an experiment was performed feeding
powderized biomass and natural gas without sorbent injection. The furnace was operated for at least a day on
natural gas prior to running these tests.
Test Conditions 1 and 2 were largely designed as baseline conditions to verify operation of the combustor and
sampling devices. Comparison of Test Conditions 3 and 4 is the core of the experimental study, where the
impact of the sorbent injection on Cs from doped powderized biomass combustion is examined.
Test Condition 3 involved combustion of Cs-doped powderized biomass without sorbent injection, and Test
Condition 4 involved combustion of Cs-doped powderized biomass with sorbent injection. Comparison of the
PSDs between these two test conditions will illustrate whether the partitioning of Cs between different size
fractions can be altered using sorbent injection.
2.2 Pelletized Biomass Tests in Rotary Kiln Incinerator Simulator
2.2.1 Combustor Description
The RKIS is a 73 kW (250,000 Btu/h) primary chamber, 73 kW (250,000 Btu/h) secondary chamber rotary kiln
thermal destruction unit that was designed to possess the salient features of full-scale units with thermal ratings
20 to 40 times larger. The RKIS matches the volumetric heat release, gas-phase residence time, and temperature
profile of many full-scale units and yet is flexible enough to enable parametric testing. A schematic drawing of
the RKIS is presented in Figure 4.
MOUDI,
NO
I;!;!;!;!;!;!;!;!;!;!;!;!;!;
Figure 4. Rotary Kiln Incinerator Simulator
9
-------
The general dimensions of the RKIS are:
• Inside diameters: 0.762 m in the kiln recess to 0.457 m in the transition and tower sections
• Outside diameters: 1.168-1.219 m
• Internal axial dimensions: 6.096 m from the front burner wall to the solids charging port
The rotating kiln section contains a recess in which solid waste is contained during incineration. The recess area
was designed with a length-to-diameter (L/D) ratio of 0.8, which is 20-25 percent of a full-scale system. An
Eclipse Model No. 82MVTA burner provides the heat to the primary combustion chamber, and an IFRF variable
swirl burner provides heat to the secondary combustion chamber (SCC). The primary fuel for the RKIS is natural
gas, but the unit can also fire on fuel oil or liquid wastes. The kiln body rests on two trunnion assemblies and is
driven by a motor and variable speed gear drive allowing the drum to rotate at selectable speeds. Rotary leaf
spring seals between the kiln and the transition/afterburner section and main burner extension are constructed
of Teflon-gasketed rotary leaf springs.
The draft damper affects the system combustion chamber pressure, which can affect in-leakage in areas that are
not leak-tight such as the seals around the main burner, charging port, and the rotary leaf spring seals. A
pneumatic ram has been installed on the charging port sliding door to minimize in-leakage. Due to drift issues
with the pressure transducers displaying the draft settings, 0 to 0.25 inches water Dwyer Instruments
Magnehelic pressure gauges (Dwyer, Michigan City, IN) were placed in-line for the PCC, SCC, and exhaust to
verify readings and allow for repeatability of firing conditions.
From the kiln, combustion gases enter the transition section. The gases make a 90° bend upwards at that point.
Just above the 90° bend, an injection port is positioned where liquid surrogate wastes can be sprayed into the
transition section.
Upon leaving the transition section, the combustion gases enter the SCC. The SCC consists of the following
regions:
• A 0.610-m diameter mixing chamber,
• A 0.610-m diameter plug flow section, and
• A stack transition section.
2.2.2 Bio mass Description
The biomass material used for these experiments was hardwood biomass pellets (Fiber Energy Products,
Mountain View, Arkansas), like those used in household smokers. The biomass was analyzed by Galbraith
Laboratories (Knoxville, TN) (see Appendix C for laboratory report including the methods used for each analysis)
for elements of interest and heat of combustion using a proximate and ultimate analysis.
10
-------
Table 4. Properties of Biomass Pel
Measurement
Value
Carbon
45.95%
Hydrogen
6.18%
Nitrogen
< 0.5%
Oxygen
42.71%
Chlorine
20 ppm
Sulfur
0.042%
Fixed Carbon
12.62%
Loss on Drying
6.00%
Volatile Matter
84.60%
Ash
1.97%
Heat of
7778 Btu/lb
Combustion
ets Used in Tests (as received)
The Continuous Feed Vibration System (Figure 5) was used to feed hardwood pellets to the kiln. The entire
feeding system, including the volumetric feeder (K-Tron 6300 Series, Coperion, Weingarten, Germany), was
removed from the kiln and calibrated using a known quantity of hardwood pellets.
The pneumatic vibrators attached to the feeder were unable to prevent the system from plugging during
operation, even after maximal tilt of the feeder was achieved. Rubber mallets were used to beat on the base of
the feeder at regular intervals while monitoring CEM instruments to avoid large fluctuations in fuel rate
(observed by increases/decreases in oxygen levels).
Introduction of biomass to the RKIS was documented in the laboratory notebook, as well as adjustments to the
natural gas firing rate at the Main Burner. Biomass pellets were fed by a volumetric feeder through a vertical
chute of flexible hose into a water-cooled tube. The water-cooled tube extended into the rotating drum of the
kiln section. The duct is at a slight incline from horizontal and is vibrated by a motor to keep the biomass pellets
traveling into the drum. The flange provides a seal during testing.
Water
Jacket
Vibrator
LZ
1
Feeding Tube
7
Screw
Feeder
cQ
Nitrogen Purge
m
Figure 5. Continuous Feed Vibration System a) Diagram; and b) Photograph
2.2.3 Sorbent Description
The sorbent for these tests was a kaolinite sorbent (Mattex Pro, BASF, Inc, Ludwigshafen, Germany). The sorbent
particle size analysis can be found in Appendix D. The sorbent had a mean particle diameter of 2.5 |im. This
sorbent had a larger average particle size than the sorbent used in the previous powderized biomass tests,
11
-------
although chemically it is the same material.
A K-Tron Soder twin screw compact weigh feeder (Model KCL24KT20, Coperion, Weingarten, Germany) was
used to feed the sorbent (kaolinite) at a specified location (in the afterburner section) in the SCC based on the
temperature profile measurements. Several calibrations were recorded in the laboratory notebook to verify
feed rate of sorbent. Difficulties in calibrations were occasionally encountered due to the rapid build-up of
moisture from the air in the kaolinite. The feeder had to be cleaned, and the sorbent replaced with a new, dry
batch.
2.2.4 Gas Analysis Equipment
2.2.4.1 Continuous Emission Monitors
Several CEM instruments were used to monitor the combustion gases at the exit of the PCC and exhaust,
adjacent to the MOUDI sampling location. An additional NO/NOx instrument was plumbed into the MOUDI
sample system to calculate the actual dilution ratio for the impactor. CEM instruments used during operation of
the RKIS and MOUDI consisted of the following analyzers:
• California Analytical Instruments (CAI) (Orange, CA) Model ZRE-CBJZ, serial number: A2M7217T
CO2/CO/O2 Analyzer; Analyzer ranges: C02, 0 to 20%; CO, 0-100 ppm; 02, 0 to 25%.
• Horiba (Kyoto, Japan) model VIA-510 CO analyzer, MFG No. 57814 1023; Analyzer Range: 0 to 1,000
ppm.
• Teledyne (Teledyne Scientific Co., Thousand Oaks, CA) Chemiluminescence Model 200EH NOx analyzer,
serial number 242; Analyzer Range: 0 to 1,000 ppm.
• Teledyne Chemiluminescence Model 200EH (Converted to Model 200EM) NOx analyzer, serial number
243; Analyzer Range: 0 to 30 ppm.
Calibrations of CEM instruments were recorded in the laboratory notebook as well as electronic data logged by
the data acquisition system (Daqview software version 9.1.11). Raw data from Daqview were incorporated into
a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet to determine run averages and calculate/display calibrations.
2.2.4.2 MOUDI Impactors
The dilution ratio of nitrogen to flue gas was determined with the intent of remaining close to the isokinetic
sampling rate while also ensuring that a large enough concentration of NO was present at the exhaust of the
MOUDI to be accurately measured by the NO analyzer (Teledyne 200EM). The calculated target dilution ratio
was approximately 14 to 1 to prevent water condensation.
The actual dilution rate for the MOUDI sampling system was monitored and calculated by introducing nitrogen
gas through a calibrated mass flow controller (Sierra Instruments [Sierra Instruments, Inc., Monterey, CA],
C100L), verifying the total flow of the system using a Dry-Cal gas flow calibrator (Bios International (MesaLab
[Mesa Laboratories, Inc., Lakewood, CO]), model: DC-1HC (High Flow Cell)), and by comparing nitric oxide (NO)
emissions inside the exhaust duct and at the outlet of the MOUDI.
2.2.5 Experimental Approach
The effect of sorbent injection on the behavior and transformation of Cs-bound biomass waste was determined
by doping the biomass with aqueous cesium chloride, prior to feeding into the RKIS operating at a constant load
of approximately 175,000 Btu/h. The concentration of Cs artificially placed onto the biomass was based on
evaluation of the XRF (Philips, Almelo, The Netherlands, Model PW2404 Spectrometer) instrument detection
12
-------
limits. The biomass was prepared by spraying a small amount of an aqueous solution of cesium chloride (CsCI)
onto the material while it was being agitated in a cement mixer. The mixture was agitated for approximately 1
minute in the cement mixer. Target concentrations of Cs were approximately 31 milligrams of Cs per pound of
biomass.
Metal speciation was determined by chemical composition analysis of size-segregated particulate matter
extracted from the exhaust. Size-segregated samples were collected using a MOUDI from Applied Physics, Inc.
(www.appliedphysicsusa.com/cascade_impactors.html). The MOUDI is a cascade impactor designed for high
concentration aerosols and provides very sharp cut points between particle sizes, digital on/off timer controls,
and flow meters. Analysis of the MOUDI filters was performed by DHL Analytical (Round Rock, TX) using
Inductively-Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS).
In addition to particulate sampling, operational data recorded on the RKIS included feed rates of the fuel,
combustion air flow, and injection rates of sorbents. Temperatures were measured within the combustion
chamber and at predetermined critical locations in the duct. The continuous emission monitoring of 02, C02, CO,
and N0X was recorded during all tests.
The primary variables of interest were: 1) the molar ratio of kaolinite in the sorbent to the Cs in the biomass; 2)
the molar ratio of Cs in the biomass to the other alkali metals and trace constituents (i.e., sodium, potassium,
chlorine) in the biomass; and 3) the concentration of Cs in the biomass. The sorbent injection temperature was
set at the optimal temperature (2060 - 2240 °F) for Cs capture as observed in Yoo et al. (2005). The
experimental tests were performed in the following order.
2.2.5.1 RKIS background check
Two sets of background runs firing only natural gas were performed, once prior to beginning any of the biomass
combustion tests and once just prior to introducing Cs to the system. The sample was taken from the duct with a
naked quartz nozzle/tube and was diluted with nitrogen as required to maintain isokinetic sampling. A MOUDI
rotating cascade impactor was used to collect filter samples and determine particle distributions. Nitrogen
dilution was used with the MOUDI sample probe to attempt to maintain isokinetic conditions at the sample
point, although there were difficulties maintaining isokinetic conditions (see Section 5). All filters from the
MOUDI were analyzed using ICP-MS. Elements of interest were Na, K, CI, Al, Si, and Cs.
2.2.5.2 Un-dooed Biomass Combustion
The next pair of experiments involved un-doped biomass incineration with and without sorbent injection. An
experiment was run feeding biomass nominally at a rate of 8 Ib/h without sorbent injection. The experiment was
repeated with kaolinite sorbent added at the position in the burner section of the SCC of the RKIS. For both
experiments, the MOUDI was used to collect filter samples for analysis.
2.2.5.3 Doped Biomass Combustion
The final experiments involved doped biomass incineration with and without sorbent injection. Using the same
firing rate as used previously, an experiment was run feeding biomass without sorbent injection. The experiment
was repeated with kaolinite sorbent added at the injection position in the afterburner section of the SCC. For
both experiments, the MOUDI was used to collect filter samples for analysis. Table 5 describes the test matrix
and samples acquired.
13
-------
Table 5. Test Matrix
Test Condition #
Cs Cone., mg/lb Biomass
Biomass Feed Rate, Ib/h
Sorbent Feed Rate, g/h
1 - Natural Gas
NA
NA
NA
Background
2 - Biomass
NA
8
NA
3 - Biomass +
NA
8
33.3
Sorbent
4 - Natural Gas
NA
NA
NA
Background
5 - Biomass + Cs
31.0
8
NA
6 - Biomass + Cs +
31.0
8
33.3
Sorbent
2.2.4.4 Temperature Profile
A temperature profile was measured using a suction pyrometer (a thermocouple with a ceramic shroud on a
water-cooled probe that pulls furnace gas samples across the thermocouple, yielding temperature
measurements that are accurate despite radiative heat transfer from the walls to the thermocouple). This
temperature profile was intended to identify the location in the SCC for the optimal temperature at which to
inject the kaolinite sorbent (approximately 1150 °C). Figure 6 shows the results of the temperature profile in
graphic and photographic form. Based on desired sorbent injection temperatures, the sorbent was injected at
the port in the afterburner chamber (first yellow chamber) of the SCC.
1160
1140
1120
1100
°o; 1080
I 1060
CD
£ 1040
1020
1000
980
960
Figure 6. SCC Temperature Profile Results
Sorbent
Injection
Yellow Green Blue Light Blue Dark Blue
Rotary Kiln SCC Chamber (Chamber Color from Right to Left)
Gas streamflowsfrom rightto left
14
-------
3.0 Results
3.1 Results from Powderized Biomass Tests in Down-Fired Vertical Tunnel
Combustor
Figure 7 depicts the PSDs of Na, Al, CI, K, and Cs for the Cs-doped biomass flour (corn and pine) with no sorbent
injection. Note that the Si data are not presented for clarity of presentation since Si might have been introduced
into the system by abrasion from the RKIS refractory walls. Data are reported in terms of normalized XRF counts
(dX/dlog Dp) versus particle aerodynamic diameter for each element. This normalization (XRF counts on a given
stage divided by the total counts on all stages) is related to species mass and reports the relative distribution of
an element across the particle size distribution. Figure 7 indicates that all the biomass alkali metals form a well-
established accumulation mode aerosol with a mean diameter of approximately 0.3 pim, indicative of elemental
vaporization, nucleation, and growth. CI is associated with these particles. Particles in this size range exhibit
reduced collection efficiencies in common particulate control devices.
4.0
_ 3.0 -
c
0
tS 2.0 -
ro
£ 1.0 -
8 o.o -
£ O.i
><
£ 4.0-
tao 3.5 -
1 3.0 -
^ 2.5 -
73 2.0 -
1.5 -
1.0 -
0.5 -
0.0 -
O.i
Figure 7. Particle Size Distributions of Cs-Doped Biomass Flour
Figure 8 presents the results from Test Condition #4 (natural gas + powderized biomass + Cs dopant + sorbent).
This condition is identical to Test Condition #3 except for added kaolinite sorbent.
Although the sorbent did capture the Cs in the case of both types of biomass, there were some anomalous
results with the pine flour. First, the pine flour was somewhat sticky, which made feeding at a constant rate very
difficult, since the material agglomerated on the screw feeder parts and then broke off at periodic intervals
despite having undergone a drying process. These feeding difficulties may, however, not need to be addressed,
Corncob Flour + Cs
Sorbent PSD
Pine Flour + Cs
Sorbent PSD
0.1 1
Aerodynamicdiameter (Dp), Lim
100
15
-------
since the next logical step in this research is to test the Cs capture ability of kaolinite sorbent in a system burning
chunks of solid biomass fuel, which is a more likely operational scenario than feeding biomass as a finely-ground
flour. Second, there was a relatively large Al and Si presence in the furnace under the test conditions where no
sorbent was being fed. This presence is potentially due to accumulation of kaolinite sorbent particles in the
combustor in places that were difficult to remove as part of the furnace cleanout process. For this reason, there
was an approximately 47% capture of Cs in the furnace when no sorbent was being fed. This capture increased
to approximately 88% with the addition of sorbent, suggesting that there was an incremental increase in capture
by 41% with the addition of the kaolinite sorbent.
Corncob Flour + Cs + Sorbent
c
o
4->
u
ro
O
u
Ll_
cc
><
Q.
0
CUD
_o
T3
X"
T3
Sorbent PSD
0.01
0.1 1 10
Pine Flour + Cs + Sorbent
Aerodynamicdiameter (Dp), pim
100
Sorbent PSD
0.5 -
100
Figure 8. Particle Size Distributions of Cs-Doped Biomass Flour + Sorbent
Figure 9 summarizes the results, showing that the partitioning of the Cs was moved to the supermicron (i.e.,
aerodynamic diameter > 1 pim) fraction by the addition of the sorbent in the case of both types of biomass. As
mentioned previously, it is possible that residual sorbent material had accumulated in the combustor, resulting
in the pine flour tests exhibiting approximately a 47% capture of the Cs without any sorbent present, based on a
ratio of the mass of Cs found above and below the 1 pim cut.
Even with the experimental difficulties that occurred due to the stickiness of the pine flour, it appears that
kaolinite sorbents can capture Cs from combustion systems burning a wide range of biomass types.
16
-------
c
o
+->
u
ro
c
o
u
Ll_
QC
><
Q.
Q
W)
_o
T3
><
T3
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.01
Corncob Flour+ Cs + Sorbent
Sorbent PSD
¦Cs Only
-Cs + Sorbent
0.1 1 10
Pine Flour+ Cs + Sorbent
Sorbent PSD
~i 1 1—i—i—i i i
100
-Cs Only
Cs + Sorbent
0.1 1
Aerodynamicdiameter (Dp), (im
100
Figure 9. Particle Size Distributions of Cs-Doped Biomass with and without Sorbent
3.2 Results from Pelletized Biomass Tests in Rotary Kiln Incinerator
Simulator
The results from the CEMs are presented in Table 6. It should be noted that the variations in the dilution ratio of
the MOUDI are somewhat due to the variability in the flow rate within the RKIS exit duct. The static pressure
within the rotating chamber of the RKIS needed to be maintained at slightly negative conditions to prevent
harmful gases from venting into the laboratory, but the transient changes in air in-leakage due to biomass feed
rate fluctuations and the impact of the kiln rotation on the rotary seals resulted in variations in the flue gas flow
rate.
The results from the pelletized biomass tests in the EPA RKIS facility are listed in Table 7 in terms of ng Cs/filter.
These results were then averaged and normalized to reflect the percentage of Cs on the different MOUDI stages.
Table 8 lists the particle size ranges caught by the various MOUDI stages. Note that MOUDI stage 10 is the
backing filter that catches all the particulate matter that passed through the other impactor stages uncaptured.
These results are graphically presented in Figure 10. None of the Cs was found in the larger particle sizes in the
runs when no sorbent was being injected. Approximately 91% of the Cs was captured in the larger particulate
fractions with the sorbent injection.
17
-------
Ta
ble 6. CEM Results
Conditions
02%
C02%
CO Low
PPm
CO High
PPm
NO Low
PPm
NO High
PPm
Dilution Ratio
NG Bkgl
Runl
3.0
10.2
0.5
0.0
2.8
50.0
17.8 to 1
NG Bkgl
Run2
3.0
10.2
0.2
0.0
3.1
49.9
15.9 to 1
NG Bkgl
Run3
3.0
10.1
0.0
0.0
2.7
50.0
18.5 to 1
NG Bkgl
Avg
3.0
10.2
0.2
0.0
2.9
50.0
17.4 to 1
B
Run2
1.6
11.6
12.4
38.4
3.1
53.5
17.5 to 1
B
Run3
2.5
11.2
6.0
3.3
3.8
59.6
15.9 to 1
B
Run4
2.8
11.0
0.9
0.0
3.9
60.4
15.5 to 1
B
Avg
2.3
11.3
6.4
13.9
3.6
57.8
16.3 to 1
B+S
Runl
4.1
10.2
0.0
0.0
5.8
71.3
12.2 to 1
B+S
Run2
4.4
9.9
0.0
0.0
4.7
70.7
15.2 to 1
B+S
Run3
4.4
9.9
0.0
0.0
4.3
70.4
16.4 to 1
B+S
Avg
4.3
10.0
0.0
0.0
4.9
70.8
14.6 to 1
NG Bkg2
Runl
3.3
9.9
2.6
0.0
3.7
59.0
15.8 to 1
NG Bkg2
Run2
3.3
10.1
1.9
0.0
6.1
59.4
9.7 to 1
NG Bkg2
Run3
3.2
10.2
1.5
0.0
6.0
59.3
9.9 to 1
NG Bkg2
Avg
3.3
10.1
2.0
0.0
5.3
59.3
11.8 to 1
B+Cs
Run2
3.5
10.4
-1.3
-3.0
7.0
72.0
10.3 to 1
B+Cs
Run3
3.1
10.8
-1.7
-3.0
7.0
68.4
9.8 to 1
B+Cs
Run4
3.2
10.7
-2.1
-2.8
7.7
67.9
8.8 to 1
B+Cs
Avg
3.3
10.6
-1.7
-3.0
7.3
69.4
9.6 to 1
B+Cs+S
Runl
3.3
10.5
1.1
-3.2
4.7
65.3
14.0 to 1
B+Cs+S
Run2
3.1
10.8
-0.3
-3.2
6.2
63.2
10.2 to 1
B+Cs+S
Run3
3.2
10.7
-1.2
-3.2
6.8
64.2
9.4 to 1
B+Cs+S
Avg
3.2
10.7
-0.1
-3.2
5.9
64.2
11.2 to 1
The first run of the experiments with cesium-doped biomass and sorbent did not have cesium present in any
stage of the impactor. It is unknown why this occurred. Potential explanations include the possibility that the Cs-
dosed hardwood pellets may not have had enough time to achieve steady-state incineration conditions in the
kiln and flow through the SCC and exhaust duct to the MOUDI sampling point. There were residual coarse
particles in the bottom of the rotating chamber of the RKIS, which possibly might have caused some capture.
Cesium was present in subsequent runs. Cs was present in all three runs when feeding Cs-doped biomass
without sorbent. The residence time of the biomass was longer during these experiments since the first run had
to be discarded due to issues with the feeder. This anomalous run is included in Table 7 although it is not
included in the averaging and subsequent reporting.
Table 7. ICP-MS Analysis Results from Pelletized Biomass/Sorbent Tests in RKIS
MOUDI
Stage
Biomass Only (ng
Cs/filter)
Biomass + Cs (ng
Cs/filter)
Biomass + Sorbent (|jg
Cs/filter)
Biomass + Cs + Sorbent
(Hg Cs/filter)
Run
1
Run
2
Run
3
Avg
Run
1
Run
2
Run
3
Avg
Run
1
Run
2
Run
3
Avg
Run
1*
Run
2
Run
3
Avg
3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.07
4
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.10
0.11
5
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.11
0.12
10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.27
0.29
0.39
0.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.03
* Run 1 with sorbent and Cs did not result in any Cs in the sampling train. It was unknown why this happened, therefore this
run is not included in the averaging although the data are presented.
18
-------
Table 8. Particle Size Fractions Caught on MOUDI Stages
Stage
Dp Min (|im)
Dp Max (iim)
10 (after-filter)
0.01
0.18
8
0.18
0.32
7
0.32
0.56
6
0.56
1
5
1
1.8
4
1.8
3.2
3
3.2
5.6
2
5.6
10
1
10
15.7
0 (Inlet)
15.7
>15.7
.hL
3 4 5 10
Moudi Stage
¦ Biomass+Cs ¦Biomass+ Cs +Sorbent
Figure 10. Cesium Particle Partitioning with and without Sorbent Injection
19
1.00
CD 0.90
Cto
K °-80
Q 0.70
| 0.60
§ 0.50
0.40
4—
O
c 0.30
o
tj 0.20
£ 0.10
0.00
-------
4.0 Discussion
A series of experiments was performed on a laboratory-scale vertically-fired furnace, using various combinations
of corncob flour and pine flour (as idealized biomass materials), a cesium chloride dopant (to simulate Cs
contamination on the biomass), and in-furnace injection of kaolinite sorbent, in a temperature regime that had
previously been shown to successfully capture Cs in a natural gas-only combustion environment. Without
sorbent injection, Cs was almost totally associated with the particle size fraction around 200 nm. With sorbent
addition, the Cs was successfully shifted into supermicron particle sizes associated with the sorbent, resulting in
65% capture of the Cs onto the sorbent while combusting corncob flour and from 47 to 88% capture while
combusting pine flour, suggesting that kaolinite sorbent injection may be a useful combustion modification that
could be used in practical-scale combustion systems while burning Cs-contaminated biomass. By shifting the
particle sizes associated with the Cs emissions to supermicron-sized particles, the ease of capturing Cs in
particulate control devices is greatly enhanced. Previous work (Yoo et al., 2005) showed that, in a natural gas-
only system, up to 85% capture was achieved. It may be possible to optimize this process further to achieve
greater degrees of capture. The apparent stickiness of the pine flour made it difficult to feed at a constant rate,
unlike the corncob flour could be fed reproducibly at a constant rate.
Given the success at capturing Cs from a natural gas-fired system (Yoo et al., 2005) and from a combustion
system burning finely pulverized biomass (Lemieux et al., 2013), follow-on work was performed using a
combustion system more representative of the type of biomass waste that would be generated from a
radiological contamination incident, in a pilot-scale rotary kiln incinerator simulator with an experimental
secondary combustion chamber. The sorbent injection was performed in the secondary combustion chamber at
a similar temperature that showed successful Cs capture in the natural gas-fired system and the powderized
biomass system.
Approximately 91% capture of the Cs was achieved in the pilot-scale RKIS experiments. The capture percentage
that was achieved was equal to or greater than the capture achieved in the previous experiments.
Data gaps still exist regarding the effect of the presence of CI, Na, and K on Cs capture, on the Cs solubility and
leachability once captured on the sorbent, and to optimize the amount of sorbent that is injected into the
furnace, but this appears to be a viable technique for minimizing Cs emissions from combustion of radionuclide-
contaminated biomass.
20
-------
5.0 Quality Control Report
The Quality Control (QC) evaluation report presented here reflects only the most recent tests that were
performed at the RKIS facility since the previously published results all had their own QC writeups associated
with them.
All test activities were documented in laboratory notebooks, data sheets, and digital photographs. The
documentation included, but was not limited to, records for calibration of equipment, operating conditions of
RKIS, and calculation spreadsheets to determine feed/injection rates, Cs concentrations, and dilution ratios of
the MOUDI sampler.
In general, the critical data elements all fell within targeted data quality indicator goals. Any deviations are
mentioned in this section. The QC deviations were mostly related to Si being present in the field blanks (possibly
due to Si contamination present in the RKIS system prior to initiation of any testing) and fluctuations in the flue
gas flow rate due to system transients related to having to operate the rotating part of the RKIS at static
pressure conditions just barely on the negative side (for safety reasons), and the impact that those transients in
the rotating section had on air in-leakage volumes throughout the system.
The following sections discuss the criteria for the quality control (QC), calibrations, and quality assurance (QA)
assessments and corrective action taken.
5.1 Quality Control
Field blanks were conducted during each day of testing. Nitrogen and air were drawn through the MOUDI
sampling system with the probe disconnected for 20 minutes. House air was run across the probe sheathe (did
not come in contact with the flue gas) to maintain the temperature of the flue gas entering the MOUDI. This was
done to detect and quantify any residual contamination that might be present in the testing vessel. All the field
blanks had silicon concentrations around 100 ng/filter in the after filter of the MOUDI (<0.18 pim aerodynamic
diameter). These were consistent with the concentrations of Si found in the after filter during each test
condition. This could be from residual Si in the RKIS (refractory, Kaowool, etc.), or could indicate contamination
of the MOUDI sampling system; possibly the anti-static tubing running from the probe to the MOUDI inlet. The
last field blank taken on the same date as the test runs burning cesium-doped biomass while injecting sorbent
also had Si present at approximately 40 ng/filter in the 0.18 to 0.32 pim (#8).
Spike samples and spike duplicates were prepared at the end of testing in various concentrations to verify that a
known amount of cesium chloride (CsCI) could be extracted from the filters with accuracy. Analysis of the spike
and spike duplicates determined the analytical results were all within 3.5% of the expected value.
5.2 Calibrations
Instruments calibrated included the mass air flow controller used to monitor the nitrogen used as the diluent for
the MOUDI sampling system, thermocouples used on the RKIS (brand new thermocouples were not calibrated),
the balance used to weigh sorbent and biomass, and the Dry-Cal meter used by the Metrology Laboratory to
verify the total flow of the MOUDI sampling system. Calibration criteria are listed in Table 9.
Calibration of the Continuous Feed Vibration System was done by feeding wood pellets through the entire
system into a 5-gallon bucket for 15 minutes. The contents of the bucket were weighed to calculate a feed rate.
This experiment was done in triplicate to verify that the targeted feed rate could be achieved (8 Ib/h). The
sorbent injection feeder (K-Tron) was calibrated in a similar fashion to verify a feed rate of approximately 33.3
grams/min.
21
-------
The required flow rate (30 liters per minute [LPM]) through the MOUDI sampling system was verified by the
EPA/NRMRL/AEMD Metrology Laboratory using a Dry-Cal gas flow calibrator.
Daily calibrations were performed on the CEM instruments monitoring combustion gases in the RKIS exhaust
and MOUDI dilution ratio. A direct calibration to each analyzer was recorded at the beginning of each test day
using a zero and span gas. This calibration was followed by a system bias check, where calibration gas was
introduced into the measurement system at the probe, upstream of the filter and all sample condition
components. A two-point calibration drift check was made daily (through the measurement system) at the end
of each day using the same gases. A system bias could not be performed on the NO analyzer sampling from the
outlet of the MOUDI. All gas cylinders used for calibration were certified by the suppliers (AirGas, Durham, NC)
that they are traceable to National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standards. Calibrations were
recorded in a laboratory notebook as well as on the Daqview software.
Table 9. CEM Calibration Criteria
Parameter
Measurement
QA/QC Check
Frequency
Acceptance Criteria
CEMs
02, C02, CO, NO
2-point direct
calibration
Pre-test
± 5% of calibration
span
CEMs
02, C02, CO, NO
2-point system
calibration
Pre- and post-test
± 10% of calibration
span
CEMs
02, C02, CO, NO
2-point drift check
Pre- and post-test
± 5% of full scale
5.3 QA Assessments and Corrective Action
5.3.1 Elemental Analysis of MOUDI substrates
Elemental analysis of MOUDI substrates was performed by DHL Analytical in Round Rock, Texas. No traces of
potassium or sodium were found on any of the substrates, although the elemental analysis of the hardwood
pellets done by Galbraith Laboratories showed occurrences of both. A majority of the potassium and sodium
may have remained in the ash at the bottom of the kiln. Any traces in the flue gas may have been below the
minimum detection limits for the ICP-MS analysis, especially the sodium which is present in the biomass at very
small concentrations.
Silicon was detected on nearly every stage on the first run of the second set of natural gas background
experiments (NG Bkg2-Rl). Detection of silicon could potentially be from residual kaolinite left in the MOUDI
sampling system, although silicon was also present in stages that did not have any detects when kaolinite was
injected. The silicon did not appear in subsequent runs, aside from the after filter. Si could also be present due
to entrainment of refractory material that got abraded off the walls of the rotating section of the kiln. For this
reason, Si was not included in the presented results.
The first run of the experiments with cesium-doped biomass and sorbent did not have cesium present in any
stage of the impactor. It is unknown why this occurred. Potential explanations include the possibility that the Cs-
dosed hardwood pellets may not have had enough time to achieve steady-state incineration conditions in the
kiln and flow through the SCC and exhaust duct to the MOUDI sampling point. There were residual coarse
particles in the bottom of the rotating chamber of the RKIS, which possibly might have caused some capture.
Cesium was present in subsequent runs. Cs was present in all three runs when feeding Cs-doped biomass
without sorbent. The residence time of the biomass was longer during these experiments since the first run had
to be discarded due to issues with the feeder.
Silicon was present in the after filter of every field blank as well as the 0.18 to 0.32 pim stage for the field blank
associated with the Cs-doped biomass and sorbent run (B+Cs+S). Si was not presented in the results due to
these anomalies.
22
-------
5.3.2 CEM Calibrations
All CEM values were corrected for bias according to equation 12-6 from EPA Method 7E (Instrumental Analyzer
Procedure) (U.S. EPA, 1990).
Discrepancies between the analyzer readout on the Teledyne 200EM NO analyzer and data recorded in DaqView
were observed during testing of biomass (no Cs and no sorbent) and biomass and sorbent (no Cs). The value on
the analyzer was within scope for the direct calibration criteria, however, values recorded by the data
acquisition system were outside the acceptance criteria. Since we were unable to perform an initial and final
system bias, these NO readings were corrected using the direct calibration value instead of initial and final
system bias. The issue was determined to be a faulty connection in the data acquisition module, which was
repaired prior to subsequent runs.
The low CO analyzer (CAI ZRE) failed the final bias and drift check for the second set of natural gas background
tests, biomass and Cs (no sorbent) runs, and Cs-doped biomass with sorbent runs. After correcting these values,
the CO remained between -2.09 and 2.57 parts per million (ppm). These measurements were consistent with
absence of CO in previous runs under similar firing conditions.
5.3.3 Rotary Kiln Incinerator Simulator
Due to drift issues with the pressure transducers displaying the draft settings, 0 to 0.25 inches water Dwyer
Instruments Magnehelic pressure gauges were placed in-line for the Main Burner, After Burner, and exhaust to
verify readings and allow for repeatability of firing conditions.
5.3.3 Biomass Feeder
The Continuous Feed Vibration System was used to feed hardwood pellets to the kiln. The entire feeding system,
including the volumetric feeder (K-Tron 6300 Series), was removed from the kiln and calibrated using a known
quantity of hardwood pellets.
The pneumatic vibrators attached to the feeder were unable to prevent the system from plugging during
operation, even after maximal tilt of the feeder was achieved. Rubber mallets were used to beat on the base of
the feeder at regular intervals while monitoring Continuous Emissions Monitoring (CEM) instruments to avoid
large fluctuations in fuel rate (observed by increases/decreases in oxygen levels).
Introduction of biomass to the RKIS was documented in the laboratory notebook, as well as adjustments to the
natural gas firing rate at the Main Burner.
5.3.4 Sorbent Injection
Several calibrations were recorded in the laboratory notebook to verify feed rate of sorbent. Difficulties in
calibrations were encountered due to the rapid build-up of moisture in the kaolinite. The feeder had to be
cleaned, and the sorbent replaced with a new, dry batch.
23
-------
6.0 Conclusions
A series of experiments was performed to investigate how well the use of in-furnace kaolinite sorbent injection
captured cesium emissions from combustors, a process that worked very effectively in a natural-gas combustion
system and worked in a biomass combustion system. The experiments were performed initially on a vertically-
fired combustor firing two types of powderized biomass, then subsequently on a rotary kiln incinerator
simulator firing pelletized biomass fed into the rotating drum section of the combustor. In both cases, the
biomass material was doped with non-radioactive cesium in the form of aqueous cesium chloride. A MOUDI
impactor was used as the primary sampling device, where success of capture was assessed by whether the
cesium predominated in the lower particle size impactor stages or whether the cesium was caught on the
impactor stages corresponding to the sorbent particle size, an indication that the cesium was associated with
the sorbent particles.
Without sorbent injection, Cs was almost totally associated with the particle size fraction around 200 nm. With
injection of the sorbent, approximately 91% of the Cs was captured in the supermicron particle size fraction in
the pilot-scale RKIS experiments. The capture percentage that was achieved was equal to or greater than the
capture achieved in the previous experiments and was similar in capture efficiency to the initial natural-gas-only
experiments.
Data gaps still exist regarding the effect of the presence of CI, Na, and K on Cs capture, on the Cs solubility and
leachability once captured on the sorbent, and to optimize the amount of sorbent that is injected into the
furnace, but this appears to be a viable technique for minimizing Cs emissions from combustion of radionuclide-
contaminated biomass.
7.0 References
Applied Physics, I., 2013. Micro-Orifice Uniform Deposit Impactor (MOUDI).
Jenkins, B.M., Baxter, L.L., T.R., M.J., Miles, T.R., 1998. Combustion Properties of Biomass. Fuel Processing
Technology 54, 17-46.
Lemieux, P., Lee, S., W., L., Winterrowd, C., 2013. Capture of Cesium During Biomass Combustion Using In-
Furnace Sorbent Injection, 2013 International Conference on Thermal Treatment Technologies and Hazardous
Waste Combustors (IT3/HWC), San Antonio, TX.
Linak, W.P., Miller, C.A., Wood, J.P., Shinagawa, T., Yoo, J.I., Santoianni, D.A., King, C.J., Wendt, J.O.L., Seo, Y.,
2004. High Temperature Interactions Between Residual Oil Ash and Dispersed Kaolinite Powders. Aerosol
Science and Technology 38, 900-913.
Linak, W.P., Srivastava, R.K., Wendt, J.O.L., 1994. Metal Aerosol Formation in a Laboratory Swirl Flame
Incinerator. Combustion Science and Technology 101, 7-27.
Musolino, S., Coulter, D.T., Tedla, H., 2011. Cesium Chloride: Dispersibility or Security?, Editorial. Health Physics
100, 459.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2010. Request for Comments on the Draft Policy Statement on the Protection
of Cesium-137 Chloride Sources and Notice of Public Meeting.
Osako, M., 2015. Appropriate Management Technologies for Radioactively Contaminated Soil and Waste, in:
Presentation at International Symposium on Radiological Issues for Fukushima's Revitalized Future (Ed.),
24
-------
Fukushima City, Japan.
Parajuli, D., Tanaka, H., Hakuta, Y., Minami, K., Fukuda, S., Umeoka, K., Kamimura, R., Hayashi, Y., Ouchi, M.,
Kawamoto, T., 2013. Dealing with the Aftermath of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident: Decontamination of
Radioactive Cesium Enriched Ash. Environmental Science & Technology 47, 3800-3806.
Statistica.com, 2017. Average price of kaolin in the U.S. from 2007 to 2017 (in U.S. dollars per ton).
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 2007. National Preparedness Guidelines.
U.S. EPA, 1989. EPA Test Method 3A, Determination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentration in Emissions
from Stationary Sources (Instrument Analyzer Procedure), Washington, DC.
U.S. EPA, 1990. EPA Test Method 7E, Determination of Nitrogen Oxides Emissions from Stationary Sources
(Instrument Analyzer Procedure), Washington, DC.
U.S. EPA, 1996a. EPA Test Method 1A, Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources with Small Stacks or
Ducts.
U.S. EPA, 1996b. EPA Test Method 10, Determination of Carbon Monoxide Emissions from Stationary Sources,
Washington, DC.
Yang, H., Lee, J., Kim, J., Yoo, J., Kim, J., 2002. Behavior of Radioactive Metal Surrogates Under Various Waste
Combustion Conditions. Journal of the Korean Nuclear Society 34, 80-89.
Yoo, J.I., Shinagawa, T., Wood, J.P., Linak, W.P., Santoianni, D.A., King, C.J., Seo, Y., Wendt, J.O.L., 2005. High-
Temperature Sorption of Cesium and Strontium on Dispersed Kaolinite Powders. Environmental Science &
Technology 39, 5087-5094.
25
-------
Appendix A: Analysis of Corncob Flour
26
-------
jfiCALBRAITH
-r,"imod j
Ai: Atumnum
fill Pjovydure MS TP
Cs Cesium
Gt^Procydur^ME 71
\ r>ot&tt,vtn
GJ.JJftooeduc Mc.-TU
A_sR£«!V«i_ '~v3!iTS
liiMmg
'¦j) i ppm A* Keutrned IIJbdn'Q
Date (Time)
S/iq-ffi-l;
ra JOliMMD
OB'S AsRfceivsd nmnn "WO 2MB
Signatures:
Published By
pat.b.eteloiier
SB10-CE"22T20:2327,947-05:00
Copyright 2010 Galbrsilh Laboratories. Inc.
Reported results are only applicable to' the item tested.
This report sftaii not b# reproduced, except in fiill, without the written approval of the laboratory.
Page 1 of 1
27
-------
jfiCALBRAITH
- fJC :~13
P*u1h, ^t4 r41 1G47
^ -<1^-541 -ooa_
F^a I I i
-us.com
Report prepared by;
Pa) B Mazier
Purchase Order;
PL> «¦ 11
For further assistance, contact
Pat B Detozier
Report Production Coordinator
PO Box 51810
Krtaxville, TN 37350-1610
(866) 546-1335
nafthkaiwttmBMailh^oBi
Sample: Corncob Flour #100
Lab ID: 2011 -M-9842
Received: 2011-01-06
Analysis Methoi
Result Basts
Arnmsrst
Date (Time)
114 Heat of Combustion 0TU,
ASTVJ 03805-10a trvodi
T670 3TU"!b A* Received
0 5^37 y
2011 €1 CF
Calculation
d499 3FL'lb Dried
Caicu a;ior>
xn oi j4
11S, Ash
AS'Tv! H1174-W
Cafcu later.
3P7 L o« or OKing (1 DDI
AEFM Oil 73 03
1 44%
1 3C %
Dried
A« Recti/yd
1 tS? 73 -yj
Caicu cnon.
con (imp
2CH 0! a
975 'In
As Recced l-t36 33"Tg XI! 01 1/
& 10 Volatile Mattet
ASTWnil 75-07
C*twvm_
S 11 t-wrd Oirij.-V) iCMnhUDTf.
Calculation
Cdfcu-ii'ior
M1 IK'S:
77. 27 "s.
is rax
17 37%
Dried
A*; R)»rfii>><=»1
As Received
Diitd
11P2 73.'*j
c,al?n-atior
Cafcu'stion
Cdicu,.-:rar.
2011-01-W
7(511 -01 -24
3)11 J1 24
iO11 -01 -24
C Catpon
C! Chhimf
CLI Procedure Wfc-3
C lien! nor
Gil PiKKiura fVfr.-4A
_ Cnlcu'a'jun
MB Cii'iten by difference
llafculgton
_C-3lcMH*mn _
i-i Hvrt'Oijtsfi
GLi Piuwiuifr W-3
_ ( Cafcu(a_ton__
jV Niiiogtn
Gl i Procedure WE-3
Caioiawn
4&bH>
50 W '<
0 17 %
0 1HW*.
¦lefsj-t
•i? ir %
f.C7%
to2%
- C 5 %
-- C t. *
A* Ryoeiv€*d
Diml
As Received
Dried
As Received
DhkI
7'Received
Dried
As Received
Diit-d
1 3-14 my
Oak'u'.mr
5(17 41 ny
'Jakii i'lon
Calculator.
Cairu d»_i_
S %" iruj
'7-iUi
1 R.S.; mg
Cdieu jsiui'
an-oi -i3
7013 -01 - 74
7011 OS 14
2011 -01 -it
X11-01 .,41
7f.11 01 74
701! 01 17S
7011-01-.4
2011 7!! 13
X11 Til-.71
GLI Pioct-duiK 156 ;
<"siloij#ictp
-C*5\
i75'J-
Ay RacvnftM
Dried
43 01 mi
-------
Report Number: 29067
GALBRAFTH
Report Date: 2011-01 -24
Signatures:
Published By: pat.b.delozier 2011 -01-24T17:40:07.677-05:00
Copyright 2011 Galbraith Laboratories, Inc.
Reported results are only applicable to the item tested.
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory.
Page 2 of 2
29
-------
Appendix B. Analysis of Pine Flour
30
-------
Report. Number: 83S8B
/jt GALBRAITH
t* * p.*>_rm.1.-
Report Dale: 2015-09-30
Laboratory Report
Report prepared for:
Chris Wlrtferrewd
Jacobs 1601111010® Inc
M.i! Hfcp H137-04
b i EPA
P^p NC 2^11
PI Km: 919-541-1847
Fm-,f v 'in-. f]iiwd.eiirfeg>eP3.go¥
Report prepared by;
Debbie S Robertson
Purchase Order;
Visa,Medtey,9;1tfi5
For further assistance, contact:
Debbie S Robertson
Report Production Coordinator
PO Box 61610
KntfWile, IN 37960 -1610
|865) 546-1336
*btfirt£iJsfiflaaalMttuBn],
Sample; #70 Pine Wood Flour
Lab ID: 2015-A-0709
Received:
2015-09-11
Anatyife Method
Result
Basis
Sample Amount
Used
Date fTlmel
1f / iiaa> ot Combustion (BTU>
GLs PfsvCed'Ure1 S-.13'
uafeuatan
«M0 RTUfi
9191 Bflrib
As Rectsiwd
Orred
0 451 My
Calcu s*ior
,:oi5 fe-B
2015-;»-a
115: Ash
ASTVSD3174-t?
Calculation
0,300 >,<¦
085%
As Received
Dried
icceiie-»g
Calcu ation
rwis 09-ji
3)15 »-»
30? Loss on Drying (LODI
GL' PiocetfUiti S IICO
6,00 %
As. Receded
) 0C:4 36' X)
;C15-09 29
P. 10 V'pWii? iWsftef
As;\«D'ii;'5-tt
C»fciM:irin
87.7a %
.tnjr-is
As Hewu'ed
Dried
1 COS 59 'ng
Calcu 4tior
iOis-a»-^
201S-09 30
81J Fustf Ca'bort (CalculMBtii
Calculation
Cdk,Wjun
S77%
¦5 'M,
Dried
Aa Recer/ed
Calculator
CalCU'dWI'
XI5 09 X
2015-3B-JQ
C: Carmn
GL! Procedure K'.E-14
Csk*tit3*n
48.28 'it,
S! ¦*>%
As Hscen'ed
nreri
2 DBS mo
Calcu star
XISj-09-.I
M5-JI X
Cf: ctiionm
GL! Procedure WE -1ft
Calculation
11 pp-n
1..' (Jp-ri
As Received
Dried
«I81 ''-0 --ig
Cafcu aiion
315-05 18
nOIS-OB-JO
MS, Owye't bv cifeenif
Cateulatcn
Calcuwion
-3451 'If
41 Cfl%
As Recei>«d
Drwi
Cm lot shop
Calcu-anor-
H: rtYHrogm
CU Fro&wSute Wf u
Calculation
6 33%
&oa's.
As R«cei .'&!
Dried
J AO mg
Calcu aSiir.
2cis-t»-;fl
iV, iVifwyen
GL! Procsatre ML - til
Cdfcui.t'mh
' C 50 %
•-050%
As Received
Dwd
J 388 mg
CaU-u'atior»
LWI5-® ?>
xiis cp-nn
S: Sulfur
(JLi PrucukM
00188%
As Necuh'tfd
167 844 Tig
201b-® -IS
Copyright 201S Gsibraiih Laboratories, inc.
Reported results are only applicable to the item tested.
This report shall not &e reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of ft* laboratory.
Page 1 of 2
31
-------
Report Number 83688
Calculation
AiGAlBRAfTH.
WT < * » O * * T 0 * ; l i, I wC
¦i'^a^Hm"Tinwmf''iniiir"Tir"Tiinrin^rTiniiiiiini»i»irTiifFrii
0.020 % Dried
Report Date: 2015-09-30
Calculation 2015-09-33
Signatures:
Published By: Debbie. S. Robertson 2015-Q9-30T18:48:50.063-04:00
Created By: Debbie.S.Robertson 2015-0-30118:46:23.33-04:0)
¦ Physical signatures are on file,
¦ "Published By' signature indicates authorized release of data.
Copyright 2015 Galbialth Laboratories, Inc.
Repotted results are only applicable to the item tested.
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory.
Page 2 of 2
32
-------
Appendix C. Analysis of Biomass Pellets
33
-------
/jt GALBRAITH
Number 98251 t* a Report Dale: 2017-05-31
Laboratory Report
Report prvparvci for:
Larty Vlrtaranta
Jacobs Teditioioqy Inc
Mail Drop H137-M
109 TW Alexander Dr
Durham, NC 27709
Phone: 919-541-0629
Bna'f; viriaranta. lanyfltepa .aw
Report prepared by:
DHr^iss S Rr>bertv"A*i
Purchase Older:
CP»TS» QOCCOD16 V
Foi further n^sistance, contact:
Dcb"h? i Robertson
Repent Production Coordinator
POBo\5ietO
KiowU TO 37950 -1810
s~S5i 546 Ui5
n^bu n cLud^ng^^mMimm
Sample; Wood Pellets
, Lab ID: 2017-E-230Q
Received:
2017-05-16
Analysis Method
Result
Basis
Sample Amount
Used
Date (Time)
fN H&a^ of Combustion (STUi
ASTM D5805
Calculation
7779 3iUMb
dJ74 3 V\ilb
As R?reivi*d
Dned
004*103$
Calculation
2017 06-15
3>1i-0e-31
n5:Asn
A SIM 03174
137%
Diied and
Ovum
S48 £2 n\g
ill 7 05 '£
Calculation
1,85%
As Renewed
Calculatwn
3017-^-31
202 Lass on Qrywp (LGD»
AfVTM D1173
310 Volute Matter
6 Of!%
Grciunrt
1015 iOmct
jjo 17-tr,: i.i
AS I'M 031 w
84 W} 'if
Dried and
Groui til
iOlAOi-X
Calculation
fift Fjwti Ca^on (Calculated',
Calculation
Calculator*
7$ 5?%
I;* 02%
13 42K
At Reread
As Received
Drretf
Calculation
Calculation
Calcination
_2ni7o=_>i__
2O17-0S-31
2017.0f.-31
C; Carton
Q 1 Pmcadu e ME -14
C. alajldlion
45 9& '*
i3 8fl %
Ground
Dnt'ii
3 179
Carcul^tion
.7017-06-24
3017 >r, .n
CI Oikv;r>&
GlIPlULCCfLVcMt-^
Calculation
iBppm
21 ppm
Ground
DrwrJ
605 54
Cafcohtn>n
a>i i'-tfc j>
joi/-us-, ii
dcife' C^cjen by diftvrc.nv
Calculation
Calculation
a 71 *
¦O 47
Own
As Rerx-jv^J
Calcii^ton
Calculation
J017-Ob 31
K17 OL 3!
Gm: Grind
Gil Ppocac-ire G-8
H: Hydrogen
GilPfuoudu^fvlE-14
aliort
W: Mfragw
LompigteC
6 18%
DfB% _
Ab Received
Oroui-wi
Dnezl
Dn&ct _
3 IT a 119
Calculation
^ 1-06-1,'
2U1 i-OS-JH
."017 .y, 31
Copyright 201? Galbraitft Laboratories, inc.
Reported rssuite are only applicable to the item tested.
This report stall not be reproduced, except in full, wllwi.it the written approval of She laboratory.
Page 1 of 2
34
-------
GALBRAfTH
«< * »; ' k i •.. < w
Report Number: 98251 ^ Report Date: 2017-C6-31
Gil Procedure MP 14
Calculation
<0.5%
< 0.53 %
Ground
Dried
3.179 mg
Calculation
2017-36 ?4
2017-05-31
.' Sulfur
GO Procedure £16-3
Calculation
0.042%
0.044%
Grand
Dried
30,639 mg
Calculation
2317-06-18
2017*05-31
Signatures:
Published By Debbie,S.Robertson 2Q17-06-3tT180\49 4S3-04:00
Created B> Debbie,S.Robertson 2D17-05-31T183D 44 293-04:0)
¦ Phys-cal signatures are on file.
¦ 'Publis'Teo By" signature indicates authorized release of data.
Coprigbt 3)17 Galbraith latmrateries nc
Reported wwilts, are only <)f>plic«tb"e to the ilen, tested.
This report shall not b» worrducpr), » wpt n full without tde written approval of the laboratory.
Page 2 of 2
35
-------
Appendix D. Particle Size Analysis of Sorbent for
Rotary Kiln Tests
SediGraph 111 V1.07
Sample
Operator
Submitter
File
Material/Liquid
Measurement Principle
Calculation Method
BASF Corporation
Unit 1
Serial Number: 1045
Page 1
# 2 SAMPLE
C:\5120\DATA\001-796.SMP
Kaolin / Water
X-Ray monitored gravity sedimentation
Stokes sedimentation and Beer's law of extinction
Test Number
Analyzed
Reported
Liquid Vise
Analysis Temp
Full Scale Mass
1
4/27/2017 12:54:37PM
4/27/2017 1:33:00PM
0.7296 mPa-s
35.0 °C
100.0%
Analysis Type
Run Time
Sample Density
Liquid Density
Base/Full Scale
Reynolds Number
Standard
0:33 hrs:min
2.730 g/cms
0.9943 g/cm5
140/ 99 kCnts/s
0,22
Low
Diameter
(|jm)
10.00
5.000
Cumulative
Mass
Finer
(Percent)
82.2
66,6
Low
Diameter
_
-------
BASF Corporation
SediGraph III V1.07 Unit 1 Serial Number: 1045 Page 2
Sample: # 2 SAMPLE
Operator:
Submitter:
File: C:\5120\DATAW01-796.SMP
Material/Liquid: Kaolin / Water
Measurement Principle: X-Ray monitored gravity sedimentation
Calculation Method: Stokes sedimentation and Beer's law of extinction
Test Number
Analyzed
Reported
Liquid Vise
Analysis Temp
Full Scale Mass
1
4/27/2017 12:64:37PM
4/27/2017 1:33:00PM
0.7296 mPa-s
35,0 °C
100.0 %
Analysis Type
Run Time
Sample Density
Liquid Density
Base/Full Scale
Reynolds Number
Standard
0:33 hrs:min
2.730 g/em3
0.9943 g/cm3
140/ 99 kCnts/s
0.22
Test 1
50
Cumulative Finer Mass Percent vs. Diameter
10
0.5
Particle Diameter (pm)
37
-------
Appendix E: ICP-MS Results for MOUDI Filters
38
-------
Ml
II
DHL
s
ANALYTICAL
March 19, 2018
Paul Lemieux
US EPA
4930 Old Page Rd Rm E311G
Durham, NC 27703
TEL: (919)541-0962
FAX Order No.: 1802197
RE: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Dear Paul Lemieux:
DHL Analytical, Inc. received 60 sample(s) on 2/26/2018 for the analyses presented in the
following report.
There were no problems with the analyses and all data met requirements of NELAC except where
noted in the Case Narrative. All non-NELAC methods will be identified accordingly in the case
narrative and all estimated uncertainties of test results are within method or EPA specifications.
If you have any questions regarding these tests results, please feel free to call. Thank you for using
DHL Analytical.
Sincerely,
John DuPont
General Manager
This report was performed under the accreditation of the State of Texas Laboratory Certification
Number: T104704211-17-19
2300 Doubie Creek Drive • Round Rock, TX 78664 • Phone (512) 388-8222 • FAX (512) 388-8229
www.dhlanalytical.com
1
-------
Table of Contents
Miscellaneous Documents 3
CaseNarrative 1802197 10
WorkOrderSampleSummary 1802197 12
PrepDatesReport 1802197 14
AnalyticalDatesReport 1802197 17
Analytical Report 1802197 20
AnalyticalQCSummaryReport 1802197 80
MQLSummaryReport 1802197 92
2
-------
109 T.W- Alexander Drive
RTP; NC 27709
Pago 1
R#pprf tp:
Bill tp:
Not Applicable
U.o. H
Chain of Custody Record
I^UJOKATQJIY:
H106, B-48S
PRO JECT NUMBER
14-2-M8
PP#
Not Applicable
L4B ADDRESS
1PA/RTPNC
PROJECT TfAMI
Thermal destruction of CBR Contaminants
Analysis Required
CQLJJECTEp BY (SIQMTIJRE)
REPORT FOllMAT (CIRCLE AtL REQUIRED)
LAB ID NO.
(for tab use only)
SAMPLE
Matrix
DATE/
TIME
RUSH
FACTOR
FIELD
SAMPLE ID
REMARKS
01/23/2018
Poiycarbon
ICP-MS
Sample Substrates
ASAP
01/23/2018
Sample Substrates
01/23/2018
Poiycarbon
Field Blanks
01/23/2018
Field Blanks
Poiycarbon
02/13/2018
Spiked Samples
fsaw-ij
TIME
14:22
RELINQUISHED BY
DATE
2/27/18
REMARKS Tcpt^kS
240 total substrates (217 poiycarbon substrates; 23 quartz filters) Tnc' n
n 0 CU3£. S <2*1
TIME
I o: to
DATE
"l/ji/it
rVED BY:
RELWQlMSHEp
BY: I/PJ
PATE
2/3 C/ft
DATE
2/33//#
TIME
l\HQ
RECEIVED BY
upS
Please sign here.
3
-------
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
1S1
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
0UA U
184
B + Ce
R2
0 «»!
185
B + Ce
R2
1 oi
186
B + Ce
R2
2 aiS
187
B + Ce
R2
3
188
B+Ce
R2
4 <3S"
189
B + Ce
R2
5 e> £
190
B + Ce
R2
6
191
B + Ce
R2
7 oS
192
B + Ce
. R2
8 cq
NA
B + Ce
R2
10 (o
193
B + Ce
R3
a a
194
B + Ce
R3
i >A
195
B + Ce
R3
2 13
196
B + Ce
R3
3 i H
197
B + Ce
R3
4 IS
198
B + Ce
R3
5 ifi
199
B + Ce
R3
6 iy
200
B + Ce
R3
7 if
201
B + Ce
R3
8 I *
NA
B + Ce
R3
10 Z»
229
B + Ce
R4
o £1
230
B + Ce
R4
1 3.1
231
B + Ce
R4
2 Sl»
232
B + Ce
R4
3 &IV
234
B + Ce
R4
4
235
B + Ce
R4
5 u
236
B + Ce
R4
6 2?
237
B+Ce
R4
7 i-S
238
B + Ce
R4
8 AH
NA
B + Ce
R4
10 3?
202
B + Ce + S
R1
0 31
203
B + Ce + s
R1
1 32
204
B + Ce + S
R1
2 n
205
B + Ce + S
R1
3 3Y
206
B + Ce + S
R1
4 3T
207
B + Ce + 5
R1
5 li
208
B + Ce + S
R1
6 J?
209
B + Ce + S
R1
7 3#
210
B + Ce + S
R1
8 Jf
NA
B + Ce + S
R1
10 H 0
211
B + Ce + S
R2
0 V
212
B + Ce + S
R2
1 ¥3
213
B + Ce + S
R2
2 Vl
214
B + Ce + S
R2
3 HI
215
B + Ce + S
R2
4 vr
216
B + Ce + S
R2
5 Vf
217
B + Ce + S
R2
6 Vf
218
B + Ce + S
R2
7
219
B + Ce + S
R2
8 Hi
NA
B + Ce + S
R2
10 5>
220
B + Ce + S
R3
o r<
221
B + Ce + S
R3
i ra.
222
B + Ce + S
R3
2 Ji
223
B + Ce + S
R3
3 STH
224
B + Ce + S
R3
4 rr
225
B + Ce + S
R3
5 Si
226
B + Ce + S
R3
6 J"?
227
B + Ce + S
R3
7
228
B + Ce + S
R3
8 j'i
NA
B + Ce + S
R3
4
-------
_SEUX
PAtHLLES.36
9195412i
US EPA 1RD
'4930 PAGING 27703
DURHAM I
5 LBS
1 OF 1
Dtt'T: 18,10,8
SHIP T^:
ANNi
512-3!
LOERS
,88-8222
fq{JND ROCK TX 78664-3801
¦ft
•' * v
&f ~> * TaWn »
¦> * TfliWn ¥mla**£ 1
TX 787 9-76
i roc isji^XT BAY -AIR 1
UPS NI ^ W34 Q1 9467 2344 X.
TRACKING # * —
BILLING: P/P
S 20.0.33- tWTMVSO ®?,GA 02/20^6
. I™""
d
>xJ
£/S
0
1
13
es
w
W
tx
¦>3*
¦or
¦C3
*5
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Client Name US EPA
Work Order Number 1802197
Sample Receipt Checklist
Date Received:
Received by EL
2/28/2018
Checklist completed by:
: U
Signature
2/28/2018
Data
Carrier name UPS Blue
Reviewed by
Initials7
2/28/2018
Date
Shipping container/cooler in good condition?
Yes
0
No ~
Not Present CD
Custody seals intact on shippping container/cooler?
Yes
~
No ~
Not Present 0
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
Yes
~
No CD
Not Present 0
Chain of custody present?
Yes
0
No CD
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received?
Yes
~
No 0
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels?
Yes
0
No ~
Samples in proper container/bottle?
Yes
0
NoED
Sample containers Intact?
Yes
0
No ~
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test?
Yes
E
NoD
Ail samples received within holding time?
Yes
0
NoD
Container/Temp Blank temperature in compliance?
Yes
0
No ~
21.5 °C
Water - VOA vials have zero headspace?
Yes
~
NoD
No VOA vials submitted 0
Water - pH<2 acceptable upon receipt?
Yes
~
No CD
NA0 LOT#
Adjusted?
Checked by
Water - ph>9 (S) or ph>10 (CN) acceptable upon receipt?
Yes
~
No CD
NA0 LOT#
Adjusted?
Checked by
Any No response must be detailed in the comments section below.
Client contacted
Contacted by;
Comments:
Date contacted:
Regarding:
Person contacted
Co C ce/yvi- sf/o sr
ir Ar
Corrective Action
C I
n
-------
Laboratory Name: DHL Analytical, Inc.
Laboratory Review Checklist: Reportable Data
Project Name: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
LRC Date: 3/19/18
Reviewer Name: Carlos Castro
Laboratory Work Order: 1802197
Prep Batch Number(s): See Prep Dates Report
Run Batch: See Analytical Dates Report
#!
A2
Description
Yes
Chain-of-Custody (C-O-C)
R1
OI
1) Did samples meet the laboratory's standard conditions of sample acceptability upon receipt?
X
I Rl-01
2) Were all departures from standard conditions described in an exception report?
X
R2
OI
Sample and Quality Control (QC) Identification
1) Are all field sample ID numbers cross-referenced to the laboratory ID numbers?
X
2) Are all laboratory ID numbers cross-referenced to the corresponding QC data?
X
R3
OI
Test Reports
1) Were all samples prepared and analyzed within holding times?
X
2) Other than those results < MQL, were all other raw values bracketed by calibration standards?
X
3) Were calculations checked by a peer or supervisor?
X
4) Were all analyte identifications checked by a peer or supervisor?
X
5) Were sample detection limits reported for all analytes not detected?
X
6) Were all results for soil and sediment samples reported on a dry weight basis?
X
7) Were % moisture (or solids) reported for all soil and sediment samples?
X
8) Were bulk soils/solids samples for volatile analysis extracted with methanol per EPA Method 5035?
X
9) If required for the project, TICs reported?
X
R4
o
Surrogate Recovery Data
1) Were surrogates added prior to extraction?
X
2) Were surrogate percent recoveries in all samples within the laboratory QC limits?
X
R5
OI
Test Reports/Summary Forms for Blank Samples
1) Were appropriate type(s) of blanks analyzed?
X
2) Were blanks analyzed at the appropriate frequency?
X
3) Where method blanks taken through the entire analytical process, including preparation and, if
applicable, cleanup procedures?
X
4) Were blank concentrations < MDL?
X
5) For analyte(s) detected in a blank sample, was the concentration, unadjusted for sample specific
factors, in all associated field samples, greater than 10 times the concentration in the blank sample?
X
R6
OI
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS):
1) Were all COCs included in the LCS?
X
2) Was each LCS taken through the entire analytical procedure, including prep and cleanup steps?
X
3) Were LCSs analyzed at the required frequency?
X
4) Were LCS (and LCSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits?
X
5) Does the detectability data document the laboratory's capability to detect the COCs at the MDL used
to calculate the SDLs?
X
6) Was the LCSD RPD within QC limits (if applicable)?
X
R7
OI
Matrix Spike (MS) and Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) Data
1) Were the project/method specified analytes included in the MS and MSD?
X
2) Were MS/MSD analyzed at the appropriate frequency?
X
3) Were MS (and MSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits?
X
4) Were MS/MSD RPDs within laboratory QC limits?
X
R8
OI
Analytical Duplicate Data
¦¦¦
1) Were appropriate analytical duplicates analyzed for each matrix?
X
2) Were analytical duplicates analyzed at the appropriate frequency?
X
3) Were RPDs or relative standard deviations within the laboratory QC limits?
X
R9
OI
Method Quantitation Limits (MQLs):
1) Are the MQLs for each method analyte included in the laboratory data package?
X
2) Do the MQLs correspond to the concentration of the lowest non-zero calibration standard?
X
3) Are unadjusted MQLs and DCSs included in the laboratory data package?
X
RIO
OI
Other Problems/Anomalies
1) Are all known problems/anomalies/special conditions noted in this LRC and ER?
X
2) Was applicable and available technology used to lower the SDL to minimize the matrix interference
affects on the sample results?
X
3) Is the laboratory NELAC-accredited under the Texas Laboratory Accreditation Program for the
analytes, matrices and methods associated with this laboratory data package?
X
7
-------
Laboratory Name: DHL Analytical, Inc.
Laboratory Review Checklist (continued): Supporting Data
Project Name: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
LRC Date: 3/19/18
Reviewer Name: Carlos Castro
Laboratory Work Order: 1802197
Prep Batch Number(s): See Prep Dates Report
Run Batch: See Analytical Dates Report
A2
Description
Yes
No
NA3
NR4
ER#5
SI
OI
Initial Calibration (ICAL)
1) Were response factors and/or relative response factors for each analyte within QC limits?
X
2) Were percent RSDs or correlation coefficient criteria met?
X
3) Was the number of standards recommended in the method used for all analytes?
X
4) Were all points generated between the lowest and highest standard used to calculate the curve?
X
5) Are ICAL data available for all instruments used?
X
6) Has the initial calibration curve been verified using an appropriate second source standard?
X
S2
OI
Initial and Continuing calibration Verification (ICCV and CCV) and Continuing Calibration
blank (CCB):
1) Was the CCV analyzed at the method-required frequency?
X
2) Were percent differences for each analyte within the method-required QC limits?
X
3) Was the ICAL curve verified for each analyte?
X
4) Was the absolute value of the analyte concentration in the inorganic CCB < MDL?
X
S3
O
Mass Spectral Tuning:
1) Was the appropriate compound for the method used for tuning?
X
2) Were ion abundance data within the method-required QC limits?
X
S4
O
Internal Standards (IS):
1) Were IS area counts and retention times within the method-required QC limits?
S5
OI
Raw Data (NELAC Section 5.5.10)
1) Were the raw data (for example, chromatograms, spectral data) reviewed by an analyst?
2) Were data associated with manual integrations flagged on the raw data?
S6
S7
O
Dual Column Confirmation
1) Did dual column confirmation results meet the method-required QC?
O
Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs):
1) If TICs were requested, were the mass spectra and TIC data subject to appropriate checks?
S8
S9
Interference Check Sample (ICS) Results:
1) Were percent recoveries within method QC limits?
Serial Dilutions, Post Digestion Spikes, and Method of Standard Additions
1) Were percent differences, recoveries, and the linearity within the QC limits specified in the
method?
S10
OI
Method Detection Limit (MDL) Studies
1) Was a MDL study performed for each reported analyte?
2) Is the MDL either adjusted or supported by the analysis of DCSs?
Sll
S12
S13
S14
OI
Proficiency Test Reports:
1) Was the lab's performance acceptable on the applicable proficiency tests or evaluation studies?
OI
Standards Documentation
OI
1) Are all standards used in the analyses NIST-traceable or obtained from other appropriate sources?
Compound/Analyte Identification Procedures
1) Are the procedures for compound/analyte identification documented?
OI
Demonstration of Analyst Competency (DOC)
1) Was DOC conducted consistent with NELAC Chapter 5 - Appendix C?
2) Is documentation of the analyst's competency up-to-date and on file?
S15
OI
Verification/Validation Documentation for Methods (NELAC Chapter 5)
1) Are all the methods used to generate the data documented, verified, and validated, where
applicable?
S16
OI
Laboratory Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs):
1) Are laboratory SOPs current and on file for each method performed?
1 Items identified by the letter "R" should be included in the laboratory data package submitted to the TCEQ in the TRRP-required report(s). Items identified by
the letter "S" should be retained and made available upon request for the appropriate retention period.
2 O = organic analyses; I = inorganic analyses (and general chemistry, when applicable).
3 NA = Not applicable.
4 NR = Not Reviewed.
5 ER# = Exception Report identification number (an Exception Report should be completed for an item if "NR" or "No" is checked).
8
-------
Laboratory Data Package Signature Page - RG-366/TRRP-13
This data package consists of:
This signature page, the laboratory review checklist, and the following reportable data:
R1 Field chain-of-custody documentation;
R2 Sample identification cross-reference;
R3 Test reports (analytical data sheets) for each environmental sample that includes:
a) Items consistent with NELAC Chapter 5,
b) dilution factors,
c) preparation methods,
d) cleanup methods, and
e) if required for the project, tentatively identified compounds (TICs).
R4 Surrogate recovery data including:
a) Calculated recovery (%R), and
b) The laboratory's surrogate QC limits.
R5 Test reports/summary forms for blank samples;
R6 Test reports/summary forms for laboratory control samples (LCSs) including:
a) LCS spiking amounts,
b) Calculated %R for each analyte, and
c) The laboratory's LCS QC limits.
R7 Test reports for project matrix spike/matrix spike duplicates (MS/MSDs) including:
a) Samples associated with the MS/MSD clearly identified,
b) MS/MSD spiking amounts,
c) Concentration of each MS/MSD analyte measured in the parent and spiked samples,
d) Calculated %Rs and relative percent differences (RPDs), and
e) The laboratory's MS/MSD QC limits
R8 Laboratory analytical duplicate (if applicable) recovery and precision:
a) The amount of analyte measured in the duplicate,
b) The calculated RPD, and
c) The laboratory's QC limits for analytical duplicates.
R9 List of method quantitation limits (MQLs) and detectability check sample results for each analyte for each
method and matrix;
R10 Other problems or anomalies.
The Exception Report for each "No" or "Not Reviewed (NR)" item in the Laboratory Review Checklist and for each analyte,
matrix, and method for which the laboratory is not accredited under the Texas Laboratory Accreditation Program.
Release Statement: I am responsible for the release of this laboratory data package. This laboratory is accredited under the Texas
Laboratory Accreditation Program for all the methods, analytes, and matrices reported in this data package except as noted in the
Exception Reports. The data have been reviewed and are technically compliant with the requirements of the methods used, except
where noted by the laboratory in the Exception Reports. By my signature below, I affirm to the best of my knowledge that all
problems/anomalies observed by the laboratory have been identified in the Laboratory Review Checklist, and no information or
data affecting the quality of the data has been knowingly withheld.
This laboratory was last inspected by TCEQ on March 27, 2017. Any findings affecting the data in this laboratory data package
are noted in the Exception Reports herein. The official signing the cover page of the report in which these data are used is
responsible for releasing this data package and is by signature affirming the above release statement is true.
Name: John DuPont
Official Title: General Manager
Name: Dr. Derhsing Luu
Official Title: Technical Director
03/19/18
Signature Date
9
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT: US EPA
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants CASE NARRATIVE
Lab Order: 1802197
Samples were analyzed using the methods outlined in the following references:
Method SW6020A - Metals Analysis (The analytes Cesium and Silicon are not NELAC Certified)
PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS
As per the project Statement of Work, DHL Analytical performed the analyses of the Moudi filter
samples for Aluminum, Potassium, Sodium, Silicon and Cesium according to the published EPA
Method 6020a, prepared according to EPA Method 3050C and reported in accordance with relevant
National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP). All incidental exceptions to
NELAP requirements are noted in the report narrative. DHL Analytical is NELAP accredited by Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and this agency does not offer accreditation for
Cesium or Silicon by Method 6020A. Results for this project are reported in units of |ig/filter.
All 240 samples received were filter samples and they were prepared according to EPA Method 3050C
and in accordance with DHL Analytical's SOP. The filters were transferred from the plastic planchet
holder to the digestion vessel by using tweezers to fold the filter once, then transferring the filter into
the digestion vessel, and then rinsing the interior of the planchet with a small volume of DI water; the
water was then transferred to the digestion vessel. Acid digestion of the samples plus batch QC
(Method Blank, LCS and LCSD) then followed DHL Analytical's SOP and as per the SOP, each batch
contains a maximum of 20 samples. After digestion was completed, each sample was analyzed to
achieve the lowest possible reporting limit within the constraints of DHL Analytical's SOP for Method
6020A. For Cesium the method detection limit (MDL) was determined via EPA protocol to be 0.05
|ig/filter and for all other target analytes the MDL is 12.5 |ig/filter. All analyses were performed in
accordance with established laboratory standard operating procedures (SOPs) that incorporate QA/QC
procedures described in the method.
Exception Report Rl-01
The samples were received and log-in performed on 2/26/2018. A total of 240 samples were received
and 60 samples were logged in under this work order and analyzed. The Chain-of-Custody (COC) was
not signed by the client upon arrival at DHL Analytical. The client sent a signed COC and sample ID
summary to DHL Analytical via email on 2/27/2018. The samples arrived in good condition and were
properly packaged.
Exception Report S9-01
For Metals analysis performed on 3/14/18 (batch 84655) the RPD for the serial dilution was above
control limits for Silicon. This is flagged accordingly in the QC summary report. The PDS was within
Page 1 of 2
10
-------
CLIENT:
US EPA
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
CASE NARRATIVE
Lab Order:
1802197
control limits for this analyte. No further corrective actions were taken.
Page 2 of 2
11
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT: US EPA
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants Work Order SaiTinle SummaFV
Lab Order: 1802197
Lab Smp ID Client Sample ID
Tag Number
Date Collected
Date Reeved
1802197-01
B+Ce- R2 - 0
184
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-02
B+Ce- R2 -1
185
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-03
B+Ce-R2- 2
186
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-04
B+Ce - R2- 3
187
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-05
B+Ce- R2 - 4
188
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-06
B+Ce- R2 - 5
189
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-07
B+Ce - R2- 6
190
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-08
B+Ce - R2- 7
191
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-09
B+Ce- R2 - 8
192
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-10
B+Ce - R2 -10
NA
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-11
B+Ce- R3 - 0
193
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-12
B+Ce- R3 -1
194
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-13
B+Ce- R3 - 2
195
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-14
B+Ce- R3 - 3
196
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-15
B+Ce- R3 - 4
197
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-16
B+Ce- R3 - 5
198
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-17
B+Ce- R3 - 6
199
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-18
B+Ce- R3 - 7
200
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-19
B+Ce- R3 - 8
201
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-20
B+Ce - R3 -10
NA
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-21
B+Ce- R4 - 0
229
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-22
B+Ce- R4 -1
230
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-23
B+Ce- R4 - 2
231
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-24
B+Ce - R4- 3
232
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-25
B+Ce- R4 - 4
234
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-26
B+Ce- R4 - 5
235
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-27
B+Ce- R4 - 6
236
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-28
B+Ce - R4- 7
237
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-29
B+Ce- R4 - 8
238
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-30
B+Ce - R4 -10
NA
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-31
B+Ce+S - R1 - 0
202
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-32
B+Ce+S - R1 -1
203
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-33
B+Ce+S - R1 - 2
204
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-34
B+Ce+S - R1 - 3
205
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-35
B+Ce+S - R1 - 4
206
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-36
B+Ce+S - R1 - 5
207
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-37
B+Ce+S - R1 - 6
208
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-38
B+Ce+S - R1 - 7
209
01/23/18
2/26/2018
Page 1 of 2
12
-------
CLIENT:
Project:
Lab Order:
US EPA
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
1802197
Work Order Sample Summary
Lab Smp ID Client Sample ID
Tag Number
Date Collected
Date Reeved
1802197-39
B+Ce+S - R1 - 8
210
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-40
B+Ce+S - R1 -10
NA
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-41
B+Ce+S - R2 - 0
211
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-42
B+Ce+S - R2 -1
212
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-43
B+Ce+S - R2 - 2
213
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-44
B+Ce+S - R2 - 3
214
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-45
B+Ce+S - R2 - 4
215
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-46
B+Ce+S - R2 - 5
216
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-47
B+Ce+S - R2 - 6
217
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-48
B+Ce+S - R2 - 7
218
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-49
B+Ce+S - R2 - 8
219
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-50
B+Ce+S - R2 -10
NA
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-51
B+Ce+S - R3 - 0
220
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-52
B+Ce+S - R3 -1
221
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-53
B+Ce+S - R3 - 2
222
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-54
B+Ce+S - R3 - 3
223
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-55
B+Ce+S - R3 - 4
224
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-56
B+Ce+S - R3 - 5
225
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-57
B+Ce+S - R3 - 6
226
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-58
B+Ce+S - R3 - 7
227
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-59
B+Ce+S - R3 - 8
228
01/23/18
2/26/2018
1802197-60
B+Ce+S - R3 -10
NA
01/23/18
2/26/2018
Page 2 of 2
13
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
19-Mar-18
Lab Order: 1802197
Client: US EPA PREP DATES REPORT
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Cont
Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Collection Date
Matrix
Test Number
Test Name
Prep Date
Batch I]
1802197-01A
B+Ce- R2 - 0
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/12/18
08:11 AM
84655
1802197-02A
B+Ce- R2 - 1
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/12/18
08:11 AM
84655
1802197-03A
B+Ce- R2 - 2
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/12/18
08:11 AM
84655
1802197-04A
B+Ce- R2 - 3
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/12/18
08:11 AM
84655
1802197-05A
B+Ce- R2 - 4
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/12/18
08:11 AM
84655
1802197-06A
B+Ce- R2 - 5
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/12/18
08:11 AM
84655
1802197-07A
B+Ce- R2 - 6
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/12/18
08:11 AM
84655
1802197-08A
B+Ce- R2 - 7
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/12/18
08:11 AM
84655
1802197-09A
B+Ce- R2 - 8
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/12/18
08:11 AM
84655
1802197-10A
B+Ce - R2 - 10
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/12/18
08:11 AM
84655
1802197-11A
B+Ce- R3 - 0
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/12/18
08:11 AM
84655
1802197-12A
B+Ce- R3 - 1
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/12/18
08:11 AM
84655
1802197-13A
B+Ce- R3 - 2
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/12/18
08:11 AM
84655
1802197-14A
B+Ce- R3 - 3
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/12/18
08:11 AM
84655
1802197-15A
B+Ce- R3 - 4
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/12/18
08:11 AM
84655
1802197-16A
B+Ce- R3 - 5
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/12/18
08:11 AM
84655
1802197-17A
B+Ce- R3 - 6
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/12/18
08:11 AM
84655
1802197-18A
B+Ce- R3 - 7
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/12/18
08:11 AM
84655
1802197-19A
B+Ce- R3 - 8
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/12/18
08:11 AM
84655
1802197-20A
B+Ce - R3 - 10
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/12/18
08:11 AM
84655
1802197-21A
B+Ce- R4 - 0
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18
09:23 AM
84699
1802197-22A
B+Ce- R4 - 1
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18
09:23 AM
84699
1802197-23A
B+Ce- R4 - 2
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18
09:23 AM
84699
1802197-24A
B+Ce- R4 - 3
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18
09:23 AM
84699
1802197-25A
B+Ce- R4 - 4
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18
09:23 AM
84699
1802197-26A
B+Ce- R4 - 5
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18
09:23 AM
84699
1802197-27A
B+Ce- R4 - 6
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18
09:23 AM
84699
1802197-28A
B+Ce- R4 - 7
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18
09:23 AM
84699
Page 1 of 3
14
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
19-Mar-18
Lab Order: 1802197
Client: US EPA PREP DATES REPORT
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Cont
Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Collection Date
Matrix
Test Number
Test Name
Prep Date
Batch I]
1802197-29A
B+Ce- R4 - 8
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:23
AM
84699
1802197-30A
B+Ce - R4 - 10
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:23
AM
84699
1802197-31A
B+Ce+S - R1 - 0
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:23
AM
84699
1802197-32A
B+Ce+S - R1 - 1
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:23
AM
84699
1802197-33A
B+Ce+S - R1 - 2
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:23
AM
84699
1802197-34A
B+Ce+S - R1 - 3
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:23
AM
84699
1802197-35A
B+Ce+S - R1 - 4
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:23
AM
84699
1802197-36A
B+Ce+S - R1 - 5
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:23
AM
84699
1802197-37A
B+Ce+S - R1 - 6
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:23
AM
84699
1802197-38A
B+Ce+S - R1 - 7
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:23
AM
84699
1802197-39A
B+Ce+S - R1 - 8
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:23
AM
84699
1802197-40A
B+Ce+S - R1 - 10
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:23
AM
84699
1802197-41A
B+Ce+S - R2 - 0
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:25
AM
84700
1802197-42A
B+Ce+S - R2 - 1
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:25
AM
84700
1802197-43A
B+Ce+S - R2 - 2
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:25
AM
84700
1802197-44A
B+Ce+S - R2 - 3
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:25
AM
84700
1802197-45A
B+Ce+S - R2 - 4
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:25
AM
84700
1802197-46A
B+Ce+S - R2 - 5
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:25
AM
84700
1802197-47A
B+Ce+S - R2 - 6
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:25
AM
84700
1802197-48A
B+Ce+S - R2 - 7
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:25
AM
84700
1802197-49A
B+Ce+S - R2 - 8
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:25
AM
84700
1802197-50A
B+Ce+S - R2 - 10
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:25
AM
84700
1802197-51A
B+Ce+S - R3 - 0
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:25
AM
84700
1802197-52A
B+Ce+S - R3 - 1
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:25
AM
84700
1802197-53A
B+Ce+S - R3 - 2
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:25
AM
84700
1802197-54A
B+Ce+S - R3 - 3
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:25
AM
84700
1802197-55A
B+Ce+S - R3 - 4
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:25
AM
84700
1802197-56A
B+Ce+S - R3 - 5
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Tota
Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:25
AM
84700
Page 2 of 3
15
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
19-Mar-18
Lab Order: 1802197
Client: US EPA
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Cont
PREP DATES REPORT
Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Collection Date
Matrix
Test Number
Test Name
Prep Date
Batch ID
1802197-57A
B+Ce+S - R3 - 6
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Total Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:25 AM
84700
1802197-58A
B+Ce+S - R3 - 7
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Total Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:25 AM
84700
1802197-59A
B+Ce+S - R3 - 8
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Total Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:25 AM
84700
1802197-60A
B+Ce+S - R3 - 10
01/23/18
Filter
SW3050B
Soil Prep Total Metals: ICP-MS
03/14/18 09:25 AM
84700
Page 3 of 3
16
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
19-Mar-18
Lab Order: 1802197
Client: US EPA ANALYTICAL DATES REPORT
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Cont
Sample ID
Oient Sample ID
Matrix
Test Number
Test Name
Batch ID
Dilution
Analysis Date
Run ID
1802197-01A
B+Ce- R2 - 0
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84655
5
03/14/18 04:37 PM
ICP-MS4
180314B
1802197-02A
B+Ce- R2 - 1
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84655
5
03/14/18 04:39 PM
ICP-MS4
180314B
1802197-03A
B+Ce- R2 - 2
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84655
5
03/14/18 04:41 PM
ICP-MS4
180314B
1802197-04A
B+Ce- R2 - 3
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84655
5
03/14/18 04:43 PM
ICP-MS4
180314B
1802197-05A
B+Ce- R2 - 4
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84655
5
03/14/18 04:45 PM
ICP-MS4
180314B
1802197-06A
B+Ce- R2 - 5
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84655
5
03/14/18 04:47 PM
ICP-MS4
180314B
1802197-07A
B+Ce- R2 - 6
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84655
5
03/14/18 04:49 PM
ICP-MS4
180314B
1802197-08A
B+Ce- R2 - 7
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84655
5
03/14/18 04:51 PM
ICP-MS4
180314B
1802197-09A
B+Ce- R2 - 8
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84655
5
03/14/18 04:53 PM
ICP-MS4
180314B
1802197-10A
B+Ce - R2 - 10
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84655
5
03/14/18 04:33 PM
ICP-MS4
180314B
1802197-11A
B+Ce- R3 - 0
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84655
5
03/14/18 05:07 PM
ICP-MS4
180314B
1802197-12A
B+Ce- R3 - 1
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84655
5
03/14/18 05:09 PM
ICP-MS4
180314B
1802197-13A
B+Ce- R3 - 2
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84655
5
03/14/18 05:11 PM
ICP-MS4
180314B
1802197-14A
B+Ce- R3 - 3
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84655
5
03/14/18 05:13 PM
ICP-MS4
180314B
1802197-15A
B+Ce- R3 - 4
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84655
5
03/14/18 05:15 PM
ICP-MS4
180314B
1802197-16A
B+Ce- R3 - 5
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84655
5
03/14/18 05:17 PM
ICP-MS4
180314B
1802197-17A
B+Ce- R3 - 6
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84655
5
03/14/18 05:19 PM
ICP-MS4
180314B
1802197-18A
B+Ce- R3 - 7
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84655
5
03/14/18 05:21 PM
ICP-MS4
180314B
1802197-19A
B+Ce- R3 - 8
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84655
5
03/14/18 05:23 PM
ICP-MS4
180314B
1802197-20A
B+Ce - R3 - 10
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84655
5
03/14/18 05:25 PM
ICP-MS4
180314B
1802197-21A
B+Ce- R4 - 0
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84699
5
03/15/18 12:46 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-22A
B+Ce-R4- 1
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84699
5
03/15/18 12:48 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-23A
B+Ce- R4 - 2
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84699
5
03/15/18 12:50 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-24A
B+Ce-R4- 3
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84699
5
03/15/18 12:52 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-25A
B+Ce- R4 - 4
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84699
5
03/15/18 12:54 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-26A
B+Ce-R4- 5
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84699
5
03/15/18 12:56 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-27A
B+Ce- R4 - 6
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84699
5
03/15/18 12:42 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-28A
B+Ce-R4- 7
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84699
5
03/15/18 12:58 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
Page 1 of 3
17
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
19-Mar-18
Lab Order: 1802197
Client: US EPA ANALYTICAL DATES REPORT
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Cont
Sample ID
Oient Sample ID
Matrix
Test Number
Test Name
Batch ID
Dilution
Analysis Date
Run ID
1802197-29A
B+Ce- R4 - 8
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi
Filter
84699
5
03/15/18 01:00 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-30A
B+Ce - R4 - 10
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi
Filter
84699
5
03/15/18 01:02 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-31A
B+Ce+S - R1 - 0
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi
Filter
84699
5
03/15/18 01:15 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-32A
B+Ce+S - R1 - 1
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi
Filter
84699
5
03/15/18 01:17 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-33A
B+Ce+S - R1 - 2
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi
Filter
84699
5
03/15/18 01:19 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-34A
B+Ce+S - R1 - 3
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi
Filter
84699
5
03/15/18 01:21 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-35A
B+Ce+S - R1 - 4
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi
Filter
84699
5
03/15/18 01:23 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-36A
B+Ce+S - R1 - 5
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi
Filter
84699
5
03/15/18 01:25 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-37A
B+Ce+S - R1 - 6
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi
Filter
84699
5
03/15/18 01:27 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-38A
B+Ce+S - R1 - 7
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi
Filter
84699
5
03/15/18 01:29 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-39A
B+Ce+S - R1 - 8
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi
Filter
84699
5
03/15/18 01:31 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-40A
B+Ce+S - R1 - 10
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi
Filter
84699
5
03/15/18 01:34 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-41A
B+Ce+S - R2- 0
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi
Filter
84700
5
03/15/18 01:54 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-42A
B+Ce+S - R2- 1
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi
Filter
84700
5
03/15/18 01:58 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-43A
B+Ce+S - R2- 2
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi
Filter
84700
5
03/15/18 02:00 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-44A
B+Ce+S - R2- 3
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi
Filter
84700
5
03/15/18 02:02 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-45A
B+Ce+S - R2- 4
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi
Filter
84700
5
03/15/18 02:04 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-46A
B+Ce+S - R2- 5
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi
Filter
84700
5
03/15/18 02:06 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-47A
B+Ce+S - R2- 6
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi
Filter
84700
5
03/15/18 02:08 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-48A
B+Ce+S - R2- 7
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi
Filter
84700
5
03/15/18 02:10 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-49A
B+Ce+S - R2- 8
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi
Filter
84700
5
03/15/18 02:13 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-50A
B+Ce+S - R2 - 10
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi
Filter
84700
5
03/15/18 02:15 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-51A
B+Ce+S - R3- 0
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi
Filter
84700
5
03/15/18 02:29 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-52A
B+Ce+S - R3- 1
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi
Filter
84700
5
03/15/18 02:31 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-53A
B+Ce+S - R3- 2
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi
Filter
84700
5
03/15/18 02:33 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-54A
B+Ce+S - R3- 3
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi
Filter
84700
5
03/15/18 02:35 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-55A
B+Ce+S - R3- 4
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi
Filter
84700
5
03/15/18 02:37 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-56A
B+Ce+S - R3- 5
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi
Filter
84700
5
03/15/18 02:39 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
Page 2 of 3
18
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
19-Mar-18
Lab Order: 1802197
Client: US EPA
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Cont
ANALYTICAL DATES REPORT
Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Matrix
Test Number Test Name
Batch ID
Dilution
Analysis Date
Run ID
1802197-57A
B+Ce+S - R3- 6
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84700
5
03/15/18 02:41 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-58A
B+Ce+S - R3- 7
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84700
5
03/15/18 02:43 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-59A
B+Ce+S - R3- 8
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84700
5
03/15/18 02:45 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
1802197-60A
B+Ce+S - R3 - 10
Filter
SW6020A
Trace Metals: ICP-MS - Moudi Filter
84700
5
03/15/18 02:47 PM
ICP-MS4
180315A
Page 3 of 3
19
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce- R2 - 0
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-01
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
184
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:37 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:37 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:37 PM
Silicon
<37.5
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:37 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:37 PM
IS: Indium
98.4
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 04:37 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
96.2
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 04:37 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 1 of 60
20
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce-R2-1
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-02
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
185
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:39 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:39 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:39 PM
Silicon
<37.5
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:39 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:39 PM
IS: Indium
98.9
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 04:39 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
94.5
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 04:39 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 2 of 60
21
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce- R2 - 2
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-03
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
186
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:41 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:41 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:41 PM
Silicon
<37.5
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:41 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:41 PM
IS: Indium
99.6
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 04:41 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
96.0
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 04:41 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 3 of 60
22
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce- R2 - 3
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-04
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
187
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:43 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:43 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:43 PM
Silicon
<37.5
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:43 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:43 PM
IS: Indium
98.7
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 04:43 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
95.0
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 04:43 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 4 of 60
23
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce- R2 - 4
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-05
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
188
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:45 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:45 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:45 PM
Silicon
<37.5
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:45 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:45 PM
IS: Indium
97.1
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 04:45 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
93.8
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 04:45 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 5 of 60
24
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce- R2 - 5
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-06
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
189
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:47 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:47 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:47 PM
Silicon
<37.5
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:47 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:47 PM
IS: Indium
97.6
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 04:47 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
94.0
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 04:47 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 6 of 60
25
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce- R2 - 6
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-07
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
190
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:49 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:49 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:49 PM
Silicon
<37.5
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:49 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:49 PM
IS: Indium
99.4
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 04:49 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
96.0
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 04:49 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 7 of 60
26
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce- R2 - 7
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-08
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
191
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:51 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:51 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:51 PM
Silicon
<37.5
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:51 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:51 PM
IS: Indium
98.9
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 04:51 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
96.2
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 04:51 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 8 of 60
27
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce- R2 - 8
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-09
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
192
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:53 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:53 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:53 PM
Silicon
<37.5
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:53 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:53 PM
IS: Indium
99.6
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 04:53 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
96.4
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 04:53 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 9 of 60
28
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce-R2-10
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-10
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
NA
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result MDL
RL Qual Units
DF Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:33 PM
Cesium
0.274
0.0500
2.00
JN
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:33 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:33 PM
Silicon
89.4
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:33 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 04:33 PM
IS: Indium
98.2
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 04:33 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
95.7
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 04:33 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 10 of 60
29
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce- R3 - 0
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-11
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
193
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05:07 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05:07 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05:07 PM
Silicon
<37.5
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05:07 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05:07 PM
IS: Indium
98.0
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 05:07 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
94.8
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 05:07 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 11 of 60
30
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce- R3 -1
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-12
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
194
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05:09 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05:09 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05:09 PM
Silicon
<37.5
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05:09 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05:09 PM
IS: Indium
98.9
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 05:09 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
95.3
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 05:09 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 12 of 60
31
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT: US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce- R3 -
2
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-13
Project No: PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
195
Lab Order: 1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses Result
MDL
RL
Qual Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05
11 PM
Cesium <2.00
0.0500
2.00
N |jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05
11 PM
Potassium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05
11 PM
Silicon <37.5
12.5
37.5
N |jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05
11 PM
Sodium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05
11 PM
IS: Indium 98.2
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 05
11 PM
IS: Scandium(1) 95.8
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 05
11 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 13 of 60
32
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT: US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce- R3 -
3
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-14
Project No: PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
196
Lab Order: 1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses Result
MDL
RL
Qual Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05
13 PM
Cesium <2.00
0.0500
2.00
N |jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05
13 PM
Potassium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05
13 PM
Silicon <37.5
12.5
37.5
N |jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05
13 PM
Sodium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05
13 PM
IS: Indium 98.6
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 05
13 PM
IS: Scandium(1) 95.4
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 05
13 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 14 of 60
33
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT: US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce- R3 -
4
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-15
Project No: PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
197
Lab Order: 1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses Result
MDL
RL
Qual Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05
15 PM
Cesium <2.00
0.0500
2.00
N |jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05
15 PM
Potassium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05
15 PM
Silicon <37.5
12.5
37.5
N |jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05
15 PM
Sodium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05
15 PM
IS: Indium 99.1
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 05
15 PM
IS: Scandium(1) 94.3
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 05
15 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 15 of 60
34
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT: US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce- R3 -
5
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-16
Project No: PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
198
Lab Order: 1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses Result
MDL
RL
Qual Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05
17 PM
Cesium <2.00
0.0500
2.00
N |jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05
17 PM
Potassium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05
17 PM
Silicon <37.5
12.5
37.5
N |jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05
17 PM
Sodium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05
17 PM
IS: Indium 97.4
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 05
17 PM
IS: Scandium(1) 98.1
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 05
17 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 16 of 60
35
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT: US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce- R3 -
6
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-17
Project No: PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
199
Lab Order: 1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses Result
MDL
RL
Qual Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05
19 PM
Cesium <2.00
0.0500
2.00
N |jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05
19 PM
Potassium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05
19 PM
Silicon <37.5
12.5
37.5
N |jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05
19 PM
Sodium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05
19 PM
IS: Indium 98.5
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 05
19 PM
IS: Scandium(1) 95.7
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 05
19 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 17 of 60
36
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce- R3 - 7
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-18
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
200
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05:21 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05:21 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05:21 PM
Silicon
<37.5
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05:21 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05:21 PM
IS: Indium
99.2
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 05:21 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
94.5
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 05:21 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 18 of 60
37
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce- R3 - 8
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-19
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
201
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05:23 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05:23 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05:23 PM
Silicon
<37.5
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05:23 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05:23 PM
IS: Indium
99.5
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 05:23 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
96.2
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 05:23 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 19 of 60
38
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce - R3 -10
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-20
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
NA
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result MDL
RL Qual Units
DF Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05:25 PM
Cesium
0.290
0.0500
2.00
JN
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05:25 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05:25 PM
Silicon
87.0
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05:25 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/14/1
8 05:25 PM
IS: Indium
98.7
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 05:25 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
93.3
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/14/1
8 05:25 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 20 of 60
39
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce- R4 - 0
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-21
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
229
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:46 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:46 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:46 PM
Silicon
<37.5
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:46 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:46 PM
IS: Indium
104
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 12:46 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
99.6
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 12:46 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 21 of 60
40
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce-R4-1
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-22
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
230
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:48 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:48 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:48 PM
Silicon
<37.5
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:48 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:48 PM
IS: Indium
103
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 12:48 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
100
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 12:48 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 22 of 60
41
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce- R4 - 2
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-23
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
231
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:50 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:50 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:50 PM
Silicon
<37.5
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:50 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:50 PM
IS: Indium
104
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 12:50 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
100
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 12:50 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 23 of 60
42
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce- R4 - 3
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-24
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
232
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:52 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:52 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:52 PM
Silicon
<37.5
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:52 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:52 PM
IS: Indium
102
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 12:52 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
99.8
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 12:52 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 24 of 60
43
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce- R4 - 4
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-25
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
234
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:54 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:54 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:54 PM
Silicon
<37.5
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:54 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:54 PM
IS: Indium
104
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 12:54 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
100
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 12:54 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 25 of 60
44
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce- R4 - 5
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-26
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
235
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:56 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:56 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:56 PM
Silicon
<37.5
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:56 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:56 PM
IS: Indium
103
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 12:56 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
99.5
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 12:56 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 26 of 60
45
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce- R4 - 6
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-27
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
236
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:42 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:42 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:42 PM
Silicon
<37.5
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:42 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:42 PM
IS: Indium
103
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 12:42 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
100
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 12:42 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 27 of 60
46
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce- R4 - 7
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-28
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
237
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:58 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:58 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:58 PM
Silicon
<37.5
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:58 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 12:58 PM
IS: Indium
102
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 12:58 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
100
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 12:58 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 28 of 60
47
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT: US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce- R4 -
8
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-29
Project No: PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
238
Lab Order: 1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses Result
MDL
RL
Qual Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
00 PM
Cesium <2.00
0.0500
2.00
N |jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
00 PM
Potassium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
00 PM
Silicon <37.5
12.5
37.5
N |jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
00 PM
Sodium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
00 PM
IS: Indium 103
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 01
00 PM
IS: Scandium(1) 100
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 01
00 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 29 of 60
48
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT: US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce- R4 -
10
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-30
Project No: PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
NA
Lab Order: 1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses Result
MDL
RL
Qual Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
02 PM
Cesium 0.394
0.0500
2.00
JN |jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
02 PM
Potassium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
02 PM
Silicon 123
12.5
37.5
N |jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
02 PM
Sodium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
02 PM
IS: Indium 103
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 01
02 PM
IS: Scandium(1) 97.5
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 01
02 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 30 of 60
49
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT: US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S -
R1 -0
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-31
Project No: PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
202
Lab Order: 1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses Result
MDL
RL
Qual Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
15 PM
Cesium <2.00
0.0500
2.00
N |jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
15 PM
Potassium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
15 PM
Silicon <37.5
12.5
37.5
N |jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
15 PM
Sodium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
15 PM
IS: Indium 103
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 01
15 PM
IS: Scandium(1) 97.7
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 01
15 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 31 of 60
50
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT: US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S -
R1 - 1
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-32
Project No: PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
203
Lab Order: 1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses Result
MDL
RL
Qual Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
17 PM
Cesium <2.00
0.0500
2.00
N |jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
17 PM
Potassium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
17 PM
Silicon <37.5
12.5
37.5
N |jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
17 PM
Sodium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
17 PM
IS: Indium 102
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 01
17 PM
IS: Scandium(1) 97.5
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 01
17 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 32 of 60
51
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT: US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S -
R1 -2
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-33
Project No: PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
204
Lab Order: 1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses Result
MDL
RL
Qual Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
19 PM
Cesium <2.00
0.0500
2.00
N |jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
19 PM
Potassium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
19 PM
Silicon <37.5
12.5
37.5
N |jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
19 PM
Sodium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
19 PM
IS: Indium 102
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 01
19 PM
IS: Scandium(1) 98.2
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 01
19 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 33 of 60
52
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT: US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S -
R1 -3
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-34
Project No: PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
205
Lab Order: 1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum 22.5
12.5
37.5
j
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
21 PM
Cesium <2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
21 PM
Potassium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
21 PM
Silicon 24.0
12.5
37.5
JN
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
21 PM
Sodium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
21 PM
IS: Indium 102
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 01
21 PM
IS: Scandium(1) 99.3
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 01
21 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 34 of 60
53
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT: US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S -
R1 -4
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-35
Project No: PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
206
Lab Order: 1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum 28 6
12.5
37.5
j
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
23 PM
Cesium <2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
23 PM
Potassium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
23 PM
Silicon 35.9
12.5
37.5
JN
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
23 PM
Sodium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
23 PM
IS: Indium 103
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 01
23 PM
IS: Scandium(1) 98.7
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 01
23 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 35 of 60
54
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT: US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S -
R1 -5
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-36
Project No: PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
207
Lab Order: 1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum 30 5
12.5
37.5
j
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
25 PM
Cesium <2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
25 PM
Potassium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
25 PM
Silicon 41.3
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
25 PM
Sodium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
25 PM
IS: Indium 102
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 01
25 PM
IS: Scandium(1) 98.4
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 01
25 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 36 of 60
55
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT: US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S -
R1 -6
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-37
Project No: PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
208
Lab Order: 1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses Result
MDL
RL
Qual Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
27 PM
Cesium <2.00
0.0500
2.00
N |jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
27 PM
Potassium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
27 PM
Silicon <37.5
12.5
37.5
N |jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
27 PM
Sodium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
27 PM
IS: Indium 102
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 01
27 PM
IS: Scandium(1) 99.8
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 01
27 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 37 of 60
56
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT: US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S -
R1 -7
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-38
Project No: PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
209
Lab Order: 1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses Result
MDL
RL
Qual Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
29 PM
Cesium <2.00
0.0500
2.00
N |jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
29 PM
Potassium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
29 PM
Silicon <37.5
12.5
37.5
N |jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
29 PM
Sodium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
29 PM
IS: Indium 102
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 01
29 PM
IS: Scandium(1) 98.2
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 01
29 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 38 of 60
57
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT: US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S -
00
1
&
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-39
Project No: PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
210
Lab Order: 1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses Result
MDL
RL
Qual Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
31 PM
Cesium <2.00
0.0500
2.00
N |jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
31 PM
Potassium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
31 PM
Silicon <37.5
12.5
37.5
N |jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
31 PM
Sodium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
31 PM
IS: Indium 102
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 01
31 PM
IS: Scandium(1) 98.7
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 01
31 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 39 of 60
58
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S - R1 -10
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-40
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
NA
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
29 2
12.5
37.5
j
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
34 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
34 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
34 PM
Silicon
116
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
34 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
34 PM
IS: Indium
102
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 01
34 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
97.1
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 01
34 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 40 of 60
59
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT: US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S -
R2-0
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-41
Project No: PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
211
Lab Order: 1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses Result
MDL
RL
Qual Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
54 PM
Cesium <2.00
0.0500
2.00
N |jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
54 PM
Potassium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
54 PM
Silicon <37.5
12.5
37.5
N |jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
54 PM
Sodium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
54 PM
IS: Indium 102
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 01
54 PM
IS: Scandium(1) 97.7
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 01
54 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 41 of 60
60
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT: US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S -
R2- 1
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-42
Project No: PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
212
Lab Order: 1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses Result
MDL
RL
Qual Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
58 PM
Cesium <2.00
0.0500
2.00
N |jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
58 PM
Potassium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
58 PM
Silicon <37.5
12.5
37.5
N |jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
58 PM
Sodium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 01
58 PM
IS: Indium 101
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 01
58 PM
IS: Scandium(1) 96.5
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 01
58 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 42 of 60
61
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S - R2 - 2
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-43
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
213
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:00 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:00 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:00 PM
Silicon
<37.5
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:00 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:00 PM
IS: Indium
102
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:00 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
95.6
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:00 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 43 of 60
62
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT: US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S -
R2-3
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-44
Project No: PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
214
Lab Order: 1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum 28.7
12.5
37.5
j
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:02 PM
Cesium 0.0695
0.0500
2.00
JN
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:02 PM
Potassium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:02 PM
Silicon 36.5
12.5
37.5
JN
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:02 PM
Sodium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:02 PM
IS: Indium 102
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:02 PM
IS: Scandium(1) 96.2
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:02 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 44 of 60
63
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S - R2 - 4
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-45
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
215
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
46.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:04 PM
Cesium
0.120
0.0500
2.00
JN
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:04 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:04 PM
Silicon
56.9
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:04 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:04 PM
IS: Indium
101
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:04 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
96.9
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:04 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 45 of 60
64
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S - R2 - 5
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-46
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
216
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
42.3
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:06 PM
Cesium
0.124
0.0500
2.00
JN
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:06 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:06 PM
Silicon
47.1
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:06 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:06 PM
IS: Indium
101
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:06 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
97.0
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:06 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 46 of 60
65
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S - R2 - 6
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-47
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
217
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:08 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:08 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:08 PM
Silicon
<37.5
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:08 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:08 PM
IS: Indium
101
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:08 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
97.0
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:08 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 47 of 60
66
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT: US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S -
R2-7
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-48
Project No: PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
218
Lab Order: 1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses Result
MDL
RL
Qual Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02
10 PM
Cesium <2.00
0.0500
2.00
N |jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02
10 PM
Potassium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02
10 PM
Silicon <37.5
12.5
37.5
N |jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02
10 PM
Sodium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02
10 PM
IS: Indium 101
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02
10 PM
IS: Scandium(1) 98.9
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02
10 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 48 of 60
67
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT: US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S -
R2-8
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-49
Project No: PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
219
Lab Order: 1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses Result
MDL
RL
Qual Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02
13 PM
Cesium <2.00
0.0500
2.00
N |jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02
13 PM
Potassium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02
13 PM
Silicon <37.5
12.5
37.5
N |jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02
13 PM
Sodium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02
13 PM
IS: Indium 102
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02
13 PM
IS: Scandium(1) 97.4
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02
13 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 49 of 60
68
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S - R2 -10
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-50
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
NA
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
20 2
12.5
37.5
j
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02
15 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02
15 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02
15 PM
Silicon
124;
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02
15 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02
15 PM
IS: Indium
101
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02
15 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
95.9
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02
15 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 50 of 60
69
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S - R3 - 0
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-51
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
220
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:29 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:29 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:29 PM
Silicon
<37.5
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:29 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:29 PM
IS: Indium
99.8
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:29 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
94.8
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:29 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 51 of 60
70
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S - R3 -1
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-52
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
221
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:31 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:31 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:31 PM
Silicon
<37.5
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:31 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:31 PM
IS: Indium
101
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:31 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
96.3
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:31 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 52 of 60
71
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S - R3 - 2
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-53
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
222
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:33 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:33 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:33 PM
Silicon
<37.5
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:33 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:33 PM
IS: Indium
100
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:33 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
95.1
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:33 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 53 of 60
72
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT: US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S -
R3 -3
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-54
Project No: PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
223
Lab Order: 1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum 33.1
12.5
37.5
j
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:35 PM
Cesium 0.0710
0.0500
2.00
JN
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:35 PM
Potassium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:35 PM
Silicon 32.9
12.5
37.5
JN
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:35 PM
Sodium <37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:35 PM
IS: Indium 101
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:35 PM
IS: Scandium(1) 94.9
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:35 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 54 of 60
73
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S - R3 - 4
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-55
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
224
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
41.6
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:37 PM
Cesium
0.104
0.0500
2.00
JN
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:37 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:37 PM
Silicon
43.0
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:37 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:37 PM
IS: Indium
101
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:37 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
96.0
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:37 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 55 of 60
74
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S - R3 - 5
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-56
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
225
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
42.8
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:39 PM
Cesium
0.107
0.0500
2.00
JN
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:39 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:39 PM
Silicon
43.8
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:39 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:39 PM
IS: Indium
100
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:39 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
95.8
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:39 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 56 of 60
75
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S - R3 - 6
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-57
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
226
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:41 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:41 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:41 PM
Silicon
14.1:1
12.5
37.5
JN
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:41 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:41 PM
IS: Indium
99.7
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:41 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
94.4
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:41 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 57 of 60
76
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S - R3 - 7
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-58
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
227
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:43 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:43 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:43 PM
Silicon
<37.5
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:43 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:43 PM
IS: Indium
99.3
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:43 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
98.1
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:43 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 58 of 60
77
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S - R3 - 8
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-59
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
228
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS - MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:45 PM
Cesium
<2.00
0.0500
2.00
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:45 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:45 PM
Silicon
<37.5
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:45 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:45 PM
IS: Indium
99.7
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:45 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
96.7
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:45 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 59 of 60
78
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT:
US EPA
Client Sample ID:
B+Ce+S - R3 -10
Project:
Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
Lab ID:
1802197-60
Project No:
PR-ORD-17-02372
Alternate ID:
NA
Lab Order:
1802197
Collection Date:
01/23/18
Matrix:
FILTER
Analyses
Result
MDL
RL
Qual
Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TRACE METALS: ICP-MS
-MOUDI FILTER
SW6020A
Analyst:
SP
Aluminum
20.9
12.5
37.5
j
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:47 PM
Cesium
0.0560
0.0500
2.00
JN
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:47 PM
Potassium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:47 PM
Silicon
150
12.5
37.5
N
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:47 PM
Sodium
<37.5
12.5
37.5
|jg/Filter
5
03/15/1
8 02:47 PM
IS: Indium
101
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:47 PM
IS: Scandium(1)
94.9
0
70-200
%REC
5
03/15/1
8 02:47 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds TCLP Maximum Concentration Level
C Sample Result or QC discussed in the Case Narrative
E TPH pattern not Gas or Diesel Range Pattern
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
S Spike Recovery outside control limits Page 60 of 60
79
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc. Date: l9~xtai'-IH
CLIENT: us epa ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
Work Order: 1802197 ^
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants RunID: ICP-MS4_180314B
The QC data in batch 84655 applies to the following samples: 1802197-01 A, 1802197-02A, 1802197-03A, 1802197-04A, 1802197-05A, 1802197-
06 A, 1802197-07A, 1802197-08A, 1802197-09A, 1802197-1 OA, 1802197-11 A, 1802197-12A, 1802197-13A, 1802197-14A, 1802197-15A, 1802197-
16A, 1802197-17A, 1802197-18A, 1802197-19A, 1802197-20A
Sample ID MB-84655 Batch ID: 84655 TestNo: SW6020A Units: [jg/Filter
SampType: MBLK RunID: ICP-MS4_180314B Analysis Date: 3/14/2018 4:24:00 PM Prep Date: 3/12/2018
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum <37.5 37.5
Cesium <2.00 2.00 N
Potassium <37.5 37.5
Silicon <37.5 37.5 N
Sodium <37.5 37.5
IS: Indium 50.0 200.0 100 70 200
IS: Scandium(1) 50.0 200.0 95.3 70 200
Sample ID LCS-84655 Batch ID: 84655 TestNo: SW6020A Units: |jg/Filter
SampType: LCS Run ID: ICP-MS4_180314B Analysis Date: 3/14/2018 4:27:00 PM Prep Date: 3/12/2018
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum
251
37.5
250.0
0
100
80
120
Cesium
50.5
2.00
50.00
0
101
80
120
N
Potassium
1290
37.5
1250
0
103
80
120
Silicon
251
37.5
250.0
0
100
80
120
N
Sodium
1290
37.5
1250
0
103
80
120
IS: Indium
50.0
200.0
96.9
70
200
IS: Scandium(1)
50.0
200.0
94.4
70
200
Sample ID LCSD-84655 Batch ID: 84655 TestNo: SW6020A Units: |jg/Filter
SampType: LCSD Run ID: ICP-MS4_180314B Analysis Date: 3/14/2018 4:29:00 PM Prep Date: 3/12/2018
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum
253
37.5
250.0
0
101
80
120
0.841
25
Cesium
50.2
2.00
50.00
0
100
80
120
0.591
25
N
Potassium
1310
37.5
1250
0
105
80
120
1.25
25
Silicon
253
37.5
250.0
0
101
80
120
0.943
25
N
Sodium
1290
37.5
1250
0
103
80
120
0.016
25
IS: Indium
50.0
200.0
96.5
70
200
0
0
IS: Scandium(1)
50.0
200.0
93.1
70
200
0
0
Sample ID 1802197-10A SD Batch ID: 84655 TestNo: SW6020A Units: |jg/Filter
SampType: SD Run ID: ICP-MS4_180314B Analysis Date: 3/14/2018 4:35:00 PM Prep Date: 3/12/2018
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum
<15
10
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
J Analyte detected between SDL and RL
DF Dilution Factor
MDL Method Detection Limit
R RPD outside accepted control limits
S Spike Recovery outside control limits
N Parameter not NELAC certified
Page 1 of 12
80
-------
CLIENT: US EPA
Work Order: 1802197
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
RunID: ICP-MS4 180314B
Sample ID 1802197-10ASD Batch ID: 84655 TestNo: SW6020A Units: |jg/Filter
SampType: SD Run ID: ICP-MS4_180314B Analysis Date: 3/14/2018 4:35:00 PM Prep Date: 3/12/2018
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Cesium 0.266 10.0 0 0.2735 2.69 10 N
Potassium <188 188 0 0 0 10
Silicon 72.8 188 0 89.41 20.5 10 RN
Sodium <188 188 0 0 0 10
IS: Indium 250 200.0 98.3 70 200 0 0
IS: Scandium(1) 250 200.0 95.2 70 200 0 0
Sample ID 1802197-10A PDS Batch ID: 84655 TestNo: SW6020A Units: |jg/Filter
SampType: PDS Run ID: ICP-MS4_180314B Analysis Date: 3/14/2018 4:55:00 PM Prep Date: 3/12/2018
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum
1220
37.5
1250
0
97.6
80
120
Cesium
50.1
2.00
50.00
0.2735
99.6
80
120
N
Potassium
1270
37.5
1250
0
102
80
120
Silicon
1360
37.5
1250
89.41
101
80
120
N
Sodium
1280
37.5
1250
0
103
80
120
IS: Indium
50.0
1000
95.5
70
200
IS: Scandium(1)
50.0
1000
92.4
70
200
Qualifiers:
B
Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF
Dilution Factor
J
Analyte detected between MDL and RL
MDL
Method Detection Limit
ND
Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
R
RPD outside accepted control limits
RL
Reporting Limit
S
Spike Recovery outside control limits
J
Analyte detected between SDL and RL
N
Parameter not NELAC certified
Page 2 of 12
81
-------
CLIENT: US EPA
Work Order: 1802197
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
RunID: ICP-MS4 180314B
Sample ID ICV-180314 Batch ID: R96908 TestNo: SW6020A Units: mg/L
SampType: ICV RunID: ICP-MS4_180314B Analysis Date: 3/14/2018 11:57:00 AM Prep Date:
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum
2.36
0.0300
2.50
0
94.4
90
110
Cesium
0.0992
0.00500
0.100
0
99.2
90
110
N
Potassium
2.54
0.300
2.50
0
102
90
110
Silicon
2.45
0.100
2.50
0
98.0
90
110
N
Sodium
2.58
0.300
2.50
0
103
90
110
IS: Indium
0.200
0.200
99.0
70
200
IS: Scandium(1)
0.200
0.200
96.1
70
200
Sample ID LCVL-180314 Batch ID: R96908 TestNo: SW6020A Units: mg/L
SampType: LCVL Run ID: ICP-MS4_180314B Analysis Date: 3/14/2018 12:04:00 PM Prep Date:
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum
0.0937
0.0300
0.100
0
93.7
70
130
Cesium
0.00189
0.00500
0.00200
0
94.4
70
130
N
Potassium
0.100
0.300
0.100
0
100
70
130
Silicon
0.0936
0.100
0.100
0
93.6
70
130
N
Sodium
0.105
0.300
0.100
0
105
70
130
IS: Indium
0.200
0.200
102
70
200
IS: Scandium(1)
0.200
0.200
98.6
70
200
Sample ID CCV7-180314 Batch ID: R96908 TestNo: SW6020A Units: mg/L
SampType: CCV RunID: ICP-MS4_180314B Analysis Date: 3/14/2018 4:15:00 PM Prep Date:
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum
5.05
0.0300
5.00
0
101
90
110
Cesium
0.205
0.00500
0.200
0
102
90
110
N
Potassium
5.25
0.300
5.00
0
105
90
110
Silicon
5.13
0.100
5.00
0
103
90
110
N
Sodium
5.24
0.300
5.00
0
105
90
110
IS: Indium
0.200
0.200
94.2
70
200
IS: Scandium(1)
0.200
0.200
91.2
70
200
Sample ID LCVL7-180314 Batch ID: R96908 TestNo: SW6020A Units: mg/L
SampType: LCVL RunID: ICP-MS4_180314B Analysis Date: 3/14/2018 4:20:00 PM Prep Date:
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum
0.0926
0.0300
0.100
0
92.6
70
130
Cesium
0.00194
0.00500
0.00200
0
97.2
70
130
N
Potassium
0.105
0.300
0.100
0
105
70
130
Silicon
0.0889
0.100
0.100
0
88.9
70
130
N
Sodium
0.104
0.300
0.100
0
104
70
130
Qualifiers:
Page 3 of 12
B
Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF
Dilution Factor
J
Analyte detected between MDL and RL
MDL
Method Detection Limit
ND
Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
R
RPD outside accepted control limits
RL
Reporting Limit
S
Spike Recovery outside control limits
J
Analyte detected between SDL and RL
N
Parameter not NELAC certified
82
-------
CLIENT: US EPA
Work Order: 1802197
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
RunID: ICP-MS4 180314B
Sample ID LCVL7-180314
Batch ID:
R96908
TestNo: SW6020A
Units: mg/L
SampType: LCVL
Run ID:
ICP-MS4.
180314B
Analysis Date: 3/14/2018 4:20:00 PM
Prep Date:
Analyte
Result
RL
SPK value RefVal %REC
LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
IS: Indium
0.200
0.200 98.0
70
200
IS: Scandium(1)
0.200
0.200 94.9
70
200
Sample ID CCV8-180314
Batch ID:
R96908
TestNo: SW6020A
Units: mg/L
SampType: CCV
Run ID:
ICP-MS4.
180314B
Analysis Date: 3/14/2018 4:57:00 PM
Prep Date:
Analyte
Result
RL
SPK value RefVal %REC
LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum
5.09
0.0300
5.00
0
102
90
110
Cesium
0.203
0.00500
0.200
0
102
90
110
N
Potassium
5.27
0.300
5.00
0
105
90
110
Silicon
5.18
0.100
5.00
0
104
90
110
N
Sodium
5.26
0.300
5.00
0
105
90
110
IS: Indium
0.200
0.200
94.4
70
200
IS: Scandium(1)
0.200
0.200
90.2
70
200
Sample ID LCVL8-180314 Batch ID: R96908 TestNo: SW6020A Units: mg/L
SampType: LCVL Run ID: ICP-MS4_180314B Analysis Date: 3/14/2018 5:02:00 PM Prep Date:
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum
0.0953
0.0300
0.100
0
95.3
70
130
Cesium
0.00192
0.00500
0.00200
0
96.2
70
130
N
Potassium
0.102
0.300
0.100
0
102
70
130
Silicon
0.0919
0.100
0.100
0
91.9
70
130
N
Sodium
0.101
0.300
0.100
0
101
70
130
IS: Indium
0.200
0.200
97.7
70
200
IS: Scandium(1)
0.200
0.200
95.2
70
200
Sample ID CCV9-180314 Batch ID: R96908 TestNo: SW6020A Units: mg/L
SampType: CCV RunID: ICP-MS4_180314B Analysis Date: 3/14/2018 5:27:00 PM Prep Date:
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum
5.03
0.0300
5.00
0
101
90
110
Cesium
0.206
0.00500
0.200
0
103
90
110
N
Potassium
5.26
0.300
5.00
0
105
90
110
Silicon
5.14
0.100
5.00
0
103
90
110
N
Sodium
5.24
0.300
5.00
0
105
90
110
IS: Indium
0.200
0.200
92.9
70
200
IS: Scandium(1)
0.200
0.200
89.9
70
200
Qualifiers:
Page 4 of 12
B
Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF
Dilution Factor
J
Analyte detected between MDL and RL
MDL
Method Detection Limit
ND
Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
R
RPD outside accepted control limits
RL
Reporting Limit
S
Spike Recovery outside control limits
J
Analyte detected between SDL and RL
N
Parameter not NELAC certified
83
-------
CLIENT: US EPA
Work Order: 1802197
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
RunID: ICP-MS4 180314B
Sample ID LCVL9-180314 Batch ID: R96908 TestNo: SW6020A Units: mg/L
SampType: LCVL RunID: ICP-MS4_180314B Analysis Date: 3/14/2018 5:31:00 PM Prep Date:
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum
0.0948
0.0300
0.100
0
94.8
70
130
Cesium
0.00196
0.00500
0.00200
0
97.8
70
130
N
Potassium
0.102
0.300
0.100
0
102
70
130
Silicon
0.0888
0.100
0.100
0
88.8
70
130
N
Sodium
0.104
0.300
0.100
0
104
70
130
IS: Indium
0.200
0.200
95.3
70
200
IS: Scandium(1)
0.200
0.200
92.2
70
200
Qualifiers:
B
Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF
Dilution Factor
J
Analyte detected between MDL and RL
MDL
Method Detection Limit
ND
Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
R
RPD outside accepted control limits
RL
Reporting Limit
S
Spike Recovery outside control limits
J
Analyte detected between SDL and RL
N
Parameter not NELAC certified
Page 5 of 12
84
-------
CLIENT: US EPA
Work Order: 1802197
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
RunID: ICP-MS4 180315A
The QC data in batch 84699 applies to the following samples: 1802197-21 A, 1802197-22A, 1802197-23A, 1802197-24A, 1802197-25A, 1802197-
26 A, 1802197-27A, 1802197-28A, 1802197-29A, 1802197-30A, 1802197-31 A, 1802197-32A, 1802197-33A, 1802197-34A, 1802197-35A, 1802197-
36 A, 1802197-37A, 1802197-38A, 1802197-39A, 1802197-40A
Sample ID MB-84699 Batch ID: 84699 TestNo: SW6020A Units: |jg/Filter
SampType: MBLK Run ID: ICP-MS4_180315A Analysis Date: 3/15/2018 12:33:00 PM Prep Date: 3/14/2018
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum <37.5 37.5
Cesium <2.00 2.00 N
Potassium <37.5 37.5
Silicon <37.5 37.5 N
Sodium <37.5 37.5
IS: Indium 50.0 200.0 102 70 200
IS: Scandium(1) 50.0 200.0 98.8 70 200
Sample ID LCS-84699 Batch ID: 84699 TestNo: SW6020A Units: |jg/Filter
SampType: LCS Run ID: ICP-MS4_180315A Analysis Date: 3/15/2018 12:36:00 PM Prep Date: 3/14/2018
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum
252
37.5
250.0
0
101
80
120
Cesium
50.2
2.00
50.00
0
100
80
120
N
Potassium
1290
37.5
1250
0
103
80
120
Silicon
251
37.5
250.0
0
101
80
120
N
Sodium
1300
37.5
1250
0
104
80
120
IS: Indium
50.0
200.0
100
70
200
IS: Scandium(1)
50.0
200.0
97.4
70
200
Sample ID LCSD-84699 Batch ID: 84699 TestNo: SW6020A Units: |jg/Filter
SampType: LCSD Run ID: ICP-MS4_180315A Analysis Date: 3/15/2018 12:38:00 PM Prep Date: 3/14/2018
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum
257
37.5
250.0
0
103
80
120
2.26
25
Cesium
50.2
2.00
50.00
0
100
80
120
0.005
25
N
Potassium
1330
37.5
1250
0
106
80
120
2.56
25
Silicon
258
37.5
250.0
0
103
80
120
2.46
25
N
Sodium
1320
37.5
1250
0
105
80
120
1.44
25
IS: Indium
50.0
200.0
101
70
200
0
0
IS: Scandium(1)
50.0
200.0
97.2
70
200
0
0
Sample ID 1802197-27A SD Batch ID: 84699 TestNo: SW6020A Units: |jg/Filter
SampType: SD Run ID: ICP-MS4_180315A Analysis Date: 3/15/2018 12:44:00 PM Prep Date: 3/14/2018
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum <188 188 0 0 0 10
Cesium <10.0 10.0 0 0 0 10
Potassium <188 188 0 0 0 10
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank DF Dilution Factor
J Analyte detected between MDL and RL MDL Method Detection Limit Page 6 of 12
ND Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit R RPD outside accepted control limits
RL Reporting Limit S Spike Recovery outside control limits
J Analyte detected between SDL and RL N Parameter not NELAC certified
85
-------
CLIENT: US EPA
Work Order: 1802197
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
RunID: ICP-MS4 180315A
Sample ID 1802197-27ASD Batch ID: 84699 TestNo: SW6020A Units: |jg/Filter
SampType: SD Run ID: ICP-MS4_180315A Analysis Date: 3/15/2018 12:44:00 PM Prep Date: 3/14/2018
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Silicon <188 188 0 0 0 10
Sodium <188 188 0 0 0 10
IS: Indium 250 200.0 103 70 200 0 0
IS: Scandium(1) 250 200.0 100 70 200 0 0
Sample ID 1802197-27A PDS Batch ID: 84699 TestNo: SW6020A Units: |jg/Filter
SampType: PDS RunID: ICP-MS4_180315A Analysis Date: 3/15/2018 1:04:00 PM Prep Date: 3/14/2018
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum
1220
37.5
1250
0
97.4
80
120
Cesium
49.1
2.00
50.00
0
98.1
80
120
N
Potassium
1260
37.5
1250
0
101
80
120
Silicon
1250
37.5
1250
0
99.8
80
120
N
Sodium
1280
37.5
1250
0
103
80
120
IS: Indium
50.0
1000
98.9
70
200
IS: Scandium(1)
50.0
1000
96.8
70
200
Qualifiers:
B
Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF
Dilution Factor
J
Analyte detected between MDL and RL
MDL
Method Detection Limit
ND
Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
R
RPD outside accepted control limits
RL
Reporting Limit
S
Spike Recovery outside control limits
J
Analyte detected between SDL and RL
N
Parameter not NELAC certified
Page 7 of 12
86
-------
CLIENT: US EPA
Work Order: 1802197
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
RunID: ICP-MS4 180315A
The QC data in batch 84700 applies to the following samples: 1802197-41 A, 1802197-42A, 1802197-43A, 1802197-44A, 1802197-45A, 1802197-
46 A, 1802197-47A, 1802197-48A, 1802197-49A, 1802197-50A, 1802197-51 A, 1802197-52A, 1802197-53A, 1802197-54A, 1802197-55A, 1802197-
56 A, 1802197-57A, 1802197-58A, 1802197-59A, 1802197-60A
Sample ID MB-84700 Batch ID: 84700 TestNo: SW6020A Units: |jg/Filter
SampType: MBLK RunID: ICP-MS4_180315A Analysis Date: 3/15/2018 1:46:00 PM Prep Date: 3/14/2018
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum <37.5 37.5
Cesium <2.00 2.00 N
Potassium <37.5 37.5
Silicon <37.5 37.5 N
Sodium <37.5 37.5
IS: Indium 50.0 200.0 99.9 70 200
IS: Scandium(1) 50.0 200.0 96.1 70 200
Sample ID LCS-84700 Batch ID: 84700 TestNo: SW6020A Units: |jg/Filter
SampType: LCS RunID: ICP-MS4_180315A Analysis Date: 3/15/2018 1:48:00 PM Prep Date: 3/14/2018
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum
255
37.5
250.0
0
102
80
120
Cesium
48.7
2.00
50.00
0
97.5
80
120
N
Potassium
1290
37.5
1250
0
103
80
120
Silicon
251
37.5
250.0
0
100
80
120
N
Sodium
1290
37.5
1250
0
103
80
120
IS: Indium
50.0
200.0
98.9
70
200
IS: Scandium(1)
50.0
200.0
95.6
70
200
Sample ID LCSD-84700 Batch ID: 84700 TestNo: SW6020A Units: |jg/Filter
SampType: LCSD RunID: ICP-MS4_180315A Analysis Date: 3/15/2018 1:50:00 PM Prep Date: 3/14/2018
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum
262
37.5
250.0
0
105
80
120
2.89
25
Cesium
50.3
2.00
50.00
0
101
80
120
3.18
25
N
Potassium
1320
37.5
1250
0
105
80
120
1.85
25
Silicon
256
37.5
250.0
0
102
80
120
2.04
25
N
Sodium
1320
37.5
1250
0
106
80
120
2.01
25
IS: Indium
50.0
200.0
98.5
70
200
0
0
IS: Scandium(1)
50.0
200.0
95.7
70
200
0
0
Sample ID 1802197-41ASD Batch ID: 84700 TestNo: SW6020A Units: |jg/Filter
SampType: SD RunID: ICP-MS4_180315A Analysis Date: 3/15/2018 1:56:00 PM Prep Date: 3/14/2018
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum <188 188 0 0 0 10
Cesium <10.0 10.0 0 0 0 10
Potassium <188 188 0 0 0 10
Qualifiers:
Page 8 of 12
B
Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF
Dilution Factor
J
Analyte detected between MDL and RL
MDL
Method Detection Limit
ND
Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
R
RPD outside accepted control limits
RL
Reporting Limit
S
Spike Recovery outside control limits
J
Analyte detected between SDL and RL
N
Parameter not NELAC certified
87
-------
CLIENT: US EPA
Work Order: 1802197
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
RunID: ICP-MS4 180315A
Sample ID 1802197-41ASD Batch ID: 84700 TestNo: SW6020A Units: |jg/Filter
SampType: SD RunID: ICP-MS4_180315A Analysis Date: 3/15/2018 1:56:00 PM Prep Date: 3/14/2018
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Silicon <188 188 0 0 0 10
Sodium <188 188 0 0 0 10
IS: Indium 250 200.0 101 70 200 0 0
IS: Scandium(1) 250 200.0 97.1 70 200 0 0
Sample ID 1802197-41A PDS Batch ID: 84700 TestNo: SW6020A Units: |jg/Filter
SampType: PDS Run ID: ICP-MS4_180315A Analysis Date: 3/15/2018 2:17:00 PM Prep Date: 3/14/2018
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum
1220
37.5
1250
0
97.7
80
120
Cesium
48.0
2.00
50.00
0
95.9
80
120
N
Potassium
1240
37.5
1250
0
99.5
80
120
Silicon
1240
37.5
1250
0
99.2
80
120
N
Sodium
1270
37.5
1250
0
102
80
120
IS: Indium
50.0
1000
97.6
70
200
IS: Scandium(1)
50.0
1000
94.2
70
200
Qualifiers:
B
Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF
Dilution Factor
J
Analyte detected between MDL and RL
MDL
Method Detection Limit
ND
Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
R
RPD outside accepted control limits
RL
Reporting Limit
S
Spike Recovery outside control limits
J
Analyte detected between SDL and RL
N
Parameter not NELAC certified
Page 9 of 12
88
-------
CLIENT: US EPA
Work Order: 1802197
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
RunID: ICP-MS4 180315A
Sample ID ICV-180315 Batch ID: R96921 TestNo: SW6020A Units: mg/L
SampType: ICV Run ID: ICP-MS4_180315A Analysis Date: 3/15/2018 12:23:00 PM Prep Date:
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum
2.42
0.0300
2.50
0
96.6
90
110
Cesium
0.0982
0.00500
0.100
0
98.2
90
110
N
Potassium
2.53
0.300
2.50
0
101
90
110
Silicon
2.49
0.100
2.50
0
99.7
90
110
N
Sodium
2.62
0.300
2.50
0
105
90
110
IS: Indium
0.200
0.200
99.1
70
200
IS: Scandium(1)
0.200
0.200
95.4
70
200
Sample ID LCVL-180315 Batch ID: R96921 TestNo: SW6020A Units: mg/L
SampType: LCVL Run ID: ICP-MS4_180315A Analysis Date: 3/15/2018 12:27:00 PM Prep Date:
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum
0.0952
0.0300
0.100
0
95.2
70
130
Cesium
0.00192
0.00500
0.00200
0
96.2
70
130
N
Potassium
0.0991
0.300
0.100
0
99.1
70
130
Silicon
0.0973
0.100
0.100
0
97.3
70
130
N
Sodium
0.108
0.300
0.100
0
108
70
130
IS: Indium
0.200
0.200
99.9
70
200
IS: Scandium(1)
0.200
0.200
96.8
70
200
Sample ID CCV1-180315 Batch ID: R96921 TestNo: SW6020A Units: mg/L
SampType: CCV RunID: ICP-MS4_180315A Analysis Date: 3/15/2018 1:06:00 PM Prep Date:
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum
4.92
0.0300
5.00
0
98.5
90
110
Cesium
0.197
0.00500
0.200
0
98.5
90
110
N
Potassium
5.16
0.300
5.00
0
103
90
110
Silicon
4.99
0.100
5.00
0
99.8
90
110
N
Sodium
5.21
0.300
5.00
0
104
90
110
IS: Indium
0.200
0.200
97.4
70
200
IS: Scandium(1)
0.200
0.200
94.6
70
200
Sample ID LCVL1-180315 Batch ID: R96921 TestNo: SW6020A Units: mg/L
SampType: LCVL RunID: ICP-MS4_180315A Analysis Date: 3/15/2018 1:10:00 PM Prep Date:
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum
0.0999
0.0300
0.100
0
99.9
70
130
Cesium
0.00195
0.00500
0.00200
0
97.3
70
130
N
Potassium
0.104
0.300
0.100
0
104
70
130
Silicon
0.104
0.100
0.100
0
104
70
130
N
Sodium
0.105
0.300
0.100
0
105
70
130
Qualifiers:
Page 10 of 12
B
Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF
Dilution Factor
J
Analyte detected between MDL and RL
MDL
Method Detection Limit
ND
Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
R
RPD outside accepted control limits
RL
Reporting Limit
S
Spike Recovery outside control limits
J
Analyte detected between SDL and RL
N
Parameter not NELAC certified
89
-------
CLIENT: US EPA
Work Order: 1802197
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
RunID: ICP-MS4 180315A
Sample ID LCVL1-180315
Batch ID: R96921
TestNo: SW6020A
Units: mg/L
SampType: LCVL
Run ID: ICP-MS4.
180315A
Analysis Date: 3/15/2018 1:10:00 PM
Prep Date:
Analyte
Result
RL
SPK value RefVal %REC
LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
IS: Indium
0.200
0.200 102
70
200
IS: Scandium(1)
0.200
0.200 96.5
70
200
Sample ID CCV2-180315
Batch ID: R96921
TestNo: SW6020A
Units: mg/L
SampType: CCV
Run ID: ICP-MS4_
180315A
Analysis Date: 3/15/2018 1:36:00 PM
Prep Date:
Analyte
Result
RL
SPK value RefVal %REC
LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum
4.95
0.0300
5.00
0
99.1
90
110
Cesium
0.195
0.00500
0.200
0
97.7
90
110
N
Potassium
5.06
0.300
5.00
0
101
90
110
Silicon
5.02
0.100
5.00
0
100
90
110
N
Sodium
5.18
0.300
5.00
0
104
90
110
IS: Indium
0.200
0.200
97.3
70
200
IS: Scandium(1)
0.200
0.200
94.7
70
200
Sample ID LCVL2-180315 Batch ID: R96921 TestNo: SW6020A Units: mg/L
SampType: LCVL RunID: ICP-MS4_180315A Analysis Date: 3/15/2018 1:41:00 PM Prep Date:
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum
0.0966
0.0300
0.100
0
96.6
70
130
Cesium
0.00190
0.00500
0.00200
0
94.8
70
130
N
Potassium
0.103
0.300
0.100
0
103
70
130
Silicon
0.0963
0.100
0.100
0
96.3
70
130
N
Sodium
0.104
0.300
0.100
0
104
70
130
IS: Indium
0.200
0.200
102
70
200
IS: Scandium(1)
0.200
0.200
96.5
70
200
Sample ID CCV3-180315 Batch ID: R96921 TestNo: SW6020A Units: mg/L
SampType: CCV Run ID: ICP-MS4_180315A Analysis Date: 3/15/2018 2:19:00 PM Prep Date:
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum
4.98
0.0300
5.00
0
99.6
90
110
Cesium
0.195
0.00500
0.200
0
97.3
90
110
N
Potassium
5.18
0.300
5.00
0
104
90
110
Silicon
5.01
0.100
5.00
0
100
90
110
N
Sodium
5.25
0.300
5.00
0
105
90
110
IS: Indium
0.200
0.200
96.6
70
200
IS: Scandium(1)
0.200
0.200
92.1
70
200
Qualifiers:
Page 11 of 12
B
Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF
Dilution Factor
J
Analyte detected between MDL and RL
MDL
Method Detection Limit
ND
Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
R
RPD outside accepted control limits
RL
Reporting Limit
S
Spike Recovery outside control limits
J
Analyte detected between SDL and RL
N
Parameter not NELAC certified
90
-------
CLIENT: US EPA
Work Order: 1802197
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
RunID: ICP-MS4 180315A
Sample ID LCVL3-180315 Batch ID: R96921 TestNo: SW6020A Units: mg/L
SampType: LCVL Run ID: ICP-MS4_180315A Analysis Date: 3/15/2018 2:24:00 PM Prep Date:
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum
0.121
0.0300
0.100
0
121
70
130
Cesium
0.00194
0.00500
0.00200
0
97.2
70
130
N
Potassium
0.103
0.300
0.100
0
103
70
130
Silicon
0.0989
0.100
0.100
0
98.9
70
130
N
Sodium
0.103
0.300
0.100
0
103
70
130
IS: Indium
0.200
0.200
98.3
70
200
IS: Scandium(1)
0.200
0.200
94.7
70
200
Sample ID CCV4-180315 Batch ID: R96921 TestNo: SW6020A Units: mg/L
SampType: CCV Run ID: ICP-MS4_180315A Analysis Date: 3/15/2018 2:49:00 PM Prep Date:
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum
5.02
0.0300
5.00
0
100
90
110
Cesium
0.198
0.00500
0.200
0
98.8
90
110
N
Potassium
5.10
0.300
5.00
0
102
90
110
Silicon
5.02
0.100
5.00
0
100
90
110
N
Sodium
5.18
0.300
5.00
0
104
90
110
IS: Indium
0.200
0.200
95.2
70
200
IS: Scandium(1)
0.200
0.200
92.7
70
200
Sample ID LCVL4-180315 Batch ID: R96921 TestNo: SW6020A Units: mg/L
SampType: LCVL RunID: ICP-MS4_180315A Analysis Date: 3/15/2018 2:54:00 PM Prep Date:
Analyte Result RL SPK value RefVal %REC LowLimit HighLimit %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Aluminum
0.123
0.0300
0.100
0
123
70
130
Cesium
0.00189
0.00500
0.00200
0
94.7
70
130
N
Potassium
0.104
0.300
0.100
0
104
70
130
Silicon
0.0998
0.100
0.100
0
99.8
70
130
N
Sodium
0.104
0.300
0.100
0
104
70
130
IS: Indium
0.200
0.200
98.6
70
200
IS: Scandium(1)
0.200
0.200
94.6
70
200
Qualifiers:
B
Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
DF
Dilution Factor
J
Analyte detected between MDL and RL
MDL
Method Detection Limit
ND
Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
R
RPD outside accepted control limits
RL
Reporting Limit
S
Spike Recovery outside control limits
J
Analyte detected between SDL and RL
N
Parameter not NELAC certified
Page 12 of 12
91
-------
DHL Analytical, Inc.
Date: 19-Mar-18
CLIENT: US EPA
Work Order: 1802197
Project: Thermal Destruction of CBR Contaminants
MQL SUMMARY REPORT
TestNo: SW6020A
Analyte
MDL
|jg/Filter
MQL
|jg/Filter
Aluminum
12.5
37.5
Cesium
0.0500
2.00
Potassium
12.5
37.5
Silicon
12.5
37.5
Sodium
12.5
37.5
Qualifiers: MQL -Method Quantitation Limit as defined by TRRP
MDL -Method Detection Limit as defined by TRRP
92
Page 1 of 1
-------
Appendix F: MOUDI Data Sheets
-------
Dilution impactor operation data sheet - MOUDI
g-afe-iv
Time N2 Flow MOUDI Duct T Probe T Pump Magnahelic Flow Meter Nox MOUDi Nox Stack
(L/min) (°F) fC) (T) f" m (°F) ? (in. WC) * (ppm) (ppm)
0
Tb
m
ssi
n
"¦5
> a y//o
5
XI
it
w
i $t-
- - //¦
?25/>0
i.b?
s?
10
n
rfi
i / y
Stop time i^vf
-------
Dilution impactor operation data sheet - MOUDI
Operator L .
Condition C*_
Run Number ^ ^
Start time ^ -
St°Ptime !<*)-*>
Time
N2 Flow MOUDI T Duct T Probe T MOUDI T Pump T Magnahelic Flow Meter Nox MOUDI Nox Stack
0
O
11
\
>7s! r
_
S"^
5
17-
s*)o
01
\
ml
f——
>*r/$T
•5-JU
10
\ 3-
«7
*>1
\
'ft
?Qr/2sr/fi-
m r
"? .SO
S" 3
20
11
11
^
\
1 ?i
>as/r
i. v r
5=i
-------
Dilution impactor operation data sheet - MOUDI
Operator / i/,, k.
Condition C*, J
Run Number £ ^
Dale 9 ^-^10 >-»¦
Start time mno "
Stop time tgro o
Time N2 Flow MOUDI T Duct T Probe T MOUDI T Pump T Magnahelic Flow Meter Nox MOUDI Nox Slack
(L/min) (°F) fC) (»F) C°F) (°F) {in. WC) * (ppm) (ppm)
0
X*
\
'17
^ Is-
/¦M U
5
ST5"?
-77
\
/sr?
¦? ?.i-/ s~
i.tr
sr
10
XI
®)3L
\
> 5.37 s"
i ,s ^
*L?&
j ?
15
$S~)
n
\
«"?3L
?a,r/r
/¦ yr
?,©r
S"H
20
551
°i 7-
\
i?4
>Jt/c
Mr
JuCt*
a
/ #
-------
Dilution impactor operation data sheet - MOUDI
Operator
Condition
Run Number
Date
Start time
Stop time
I. 'I* r*^fx.
F6 - i
/fV/
Time
N2 Flow MOUDI T Duct T Probe T MOUDI T Pump T Magnahelic Flow Meter Nox MOUDI Nox Stack
0
n
V
**
\
l%\
t-HL
V
\
5
n
m
\
\
/5 V.
>Jxy r
i-*i4
\
10
XV
°\ i
\
?>
\
(tX
I-Ht
\
\
15
xx
n
\
\
ifcV
yisj s
1-14
\
\
20
n i
\
ST-
V
!>V
I HW
\
\
-------
Dilution impactor operation data sheet - MOUDI
Operator
Condition
Run Number
Date
Start time
Stop time
/
JLl
1- XI- loi7~
: t &p
Time
N2 Flow Flow Meter Duct T Probe T MOUDI T Pump T Top Mag Bottom Mag NO MOUDt NO Stack
0
-v' -3
s~r>?
K
it
^•2.3""
<—
5
>0 ?
I-
s"-r*
,£C
1ST
n\"
ft
ft
10
xr i
i.Hb
Cff
CI
<*
>
s" h'S'
15
1ST S
hHT
K & ")
Ills
«??
c9S**
>ar
iT*
C Ss-
>.5"
r
5 - 4 5
Sv
-------
Dilution impactor operation data sheet - MOUDI
Operator L-
Condition v
Run Number jk*C g i
Date 9 • xi- >x
Start time #:ho
Stop time 2-5"
r
5
y.yr
s<")
9"*
no
s-
"*.vo
10
/•vr
U
9 1
b~
r
5
4o
15
J
},HT
i> 6 !
•>x
r
57
20
4/
t-LfC
1 & &
13
9?
X
f. 15-
5?
-------
Dilution impactor operation data sheet - MOUDI
Operator j. \/t,U
Condition s
Run Number
Date
Start time -yjc/
Stop time 73 y
Time N2 Flow Flow Meter Duct T Probe T MOUDI T Pump T Top Mag Bottom Mag NO MOUDI NO Stack
(L/min) * (°C) (°F) fF) ("F) (in. WC) (in. WC) (ppm) (ppm)
0
2£.-*>
f.V2v~
10
I.H H
i b i—
I o
>X>"
5*
h.F^.
6s"
15
i. vy
/ o\^
9V
e-
r' p
6V
20
4
r,
..Ml
J"41
£ol
f¥
ST"
> -«i
-------
Dilution impactor operation data sheet - MOUDI
Operator
Condition
Run Number
Date
Start time
Stop time
W -
i!T
5f~
¦!
E
l-H?r
r
—*
10
(-13
ft'
103
*5 "3
5\ctf
6'
15
1, <-f "5
S" 6 I
9tl
>;u~
IT-
S"r?
6 s"
20
s
r
56 c>
>0"?
? IT
tf 4
>2C
S'
sn
/* *•«**«
%S>
————
-------
Dilution impaetor operation data sheet - MOUDI
Operator j . k
Condition
J? )h*\ X
Run Number
F S
-1
Date
-
lotT-
Start time
loir
Stop time
i >•> ?r*
Time N2 Flow Flow Meter Duct T Probe T MOUDI T Pump T Top Mag Bottom Mag NO MOUDI NO Stack
(L/min) * CC) ('F) (T) (°F) (in. WC) (in. WC) (ppm) (ppm)
0
14 .1
),HH
a/a
^ir
c
/V4
P4
5
163
<»r
It
•? M
> Ar
s_
10
i.if
IE
>ir
r*
15
i tr
1
r
20
US
tin
\
1"
7#
?r
^3-S"
5'
*
\
***
-------
Dilution impactor operation data sheet - MOUDi
Operator
Condition
Run Number
Date
Start time
Stop time
i , f f-v
f tort** ^
AX
to -1- / >
IH
Time
M2 Flow Flow Meter Duct T Probe T MOUDI T Pump T Top Mag Bottom Mag NO MOUDi NO Stack
0
yuiiin\j
26.5
I.MH
\
IX
=» i
1 i
>s.r
r
5
«.HS
>ar
5'
10
U*
i 0 c»
13
9i
>2^
5-
<-?3
15
I.
5TA1
l& 1
<9*
sr
?2^
s-
5 6^
1
-------
Dilution impactor operation data sheet - MOUDI
Operator L. \/,rW
Condition g,—
Run Number
Date -to -i «
Start time mi i
Stop time 1 i*"1
Time ' N2 Flow "FlowMeter Duct T Probe T MOUDI T PumpT Top Mag Bottom Mag NO MOUDI NO Stack
(L/min) * (°C) (°F) ( F) (°F) (in. WC) (in. WC) (ppm) (ppm)
0
IMy
S"t»4
57
fl
>2S
r
i*-
t?
5
t.m
Sfer
4 03
*¦
1 ?
>a r
5"
?.T(.
10
«*» i /
st»«>
i o*7
IX
>5tr
r
6>.
15
,
/.Ml
S"fc ^
r
L.te
20
vt
' , Hi
CC7
lO s
Oil
sr
G,oo
—— —
-------
Dilution impactor operation data sheet - MOUDI
Operator L ^rU
Condition &»»«< * h
Run Number <3
Date
Start time
Stop time /a y
Time N2 Flow Flow Meter Duct T Probe T MOUDI T Pump T Top Mag Bottom Mag NO MOUDI NO Stack
(L/min) * (X) (°F) (°F) (°F) {in. WC) (in. WC) (ppm) (ppm)
0
i-*7.
5i%
n~i
fa
>ir
ST
«•«»
9-*>
5
I
«-4t
JO 1
5T
?. * r
7T-
10
/. 11
101
r
S, <>3
?v
15
I
1. V/
S"4'i
to >
6) <
K
>2C
5"
r. w "s
71
20
\T
1
Ski
IOJ
<96
°)X,
>ar
r
S.tl
IO
-------
Dilution impactor operation data sheet - MOUDI
Operator
Condition
Run Number
Date
Start time
Stop time
L. v,-,u
/"«&/ In r-
pi5 '3
0 *S' IT-
/£WO
/too
Time
N2FI0W Flow Meter Duct T Probe? MOUDI T Pump T Top Mag Bottom Mag NO MOUDI NO Stack
0
3.&.S
i .*
A/A.
~bt
"3! /
* fa
>zs~
5~
\MH" v
5
I.HH
7S>
?S"
-?15T
S~
10
l-SH
7b
r
15
/ V*-/
i ^
7b
»w~
s~
20
\r
i, Hi
*%
»
"?"4
>?.y
s~
f
/
-------
Dilution impactor operation data sheet - MOUDI
Operator
Condition
Run Number
Date
Start time
Stop time
L -
*AO
Time
N2 Flow Flow Meter Duct T Probe T MOUDI T PumpT Top Mag Bottom Mag NO MOUDI NO Stack
0
1
^7
*,v-/
;>A3-
5*
W'U
ippm;
41
5
It 2,
sr 1
n
°l ©
?3Lr
r
u./o
10
-.
i .41
sri
96
*) i
>*r
r
w.S7
A.l
15
26,2
f M%
cs^
ft
*}>
>3. J"
M-^f
Q ,-
4/
20
f.MH
i>...ST £
) o<>
11
*7 (
W-T
5"
v*. i X
6 t
-------
Dilution impactor operation data sheet - MOUDI
°Perat0r
Condltion AJJh^J Ci> 2
Run Number ^ ^
Date )\-i - />
Start time lt
Stop time io . i,
Time
N2 Flow Flow Meter Duct T Probe T MOUDI T Pump T Top Mag Bottom Mag NO MOUDI NO Stack
0
i. <4} X
5"
\kk"v
4*
5
U-*,
I -1?
SST9
101
~)o
>Xe
y
"7. feX
bo
10
LHS
i 0*f1
X
>i*r
5T
THf
bX
15
I, HH
sit
1 0"3»
9 1
>lr
S"
fc, X
20
26 -"?
l-H ^
i-? 1
lOf
*}H
If
>iy
5T
a-*3
4 \
-------
Dilution impactor operation data sheet - MOUDI
4,
Operator . W
Condition A/^r^i 1
Run Number _
Date; rl, >« i >
Start time j0h <
Stop time i> 9\
Time N2 Flow Flow Meter Duct T Probe T MOUDI T Pump T Top Mag Bottom Mag NO MOUDI NO Stack
(L/min) * (°C) CF) (°F) fF) (in WC) (in. WC) (ppm) (ppm)
0
I.HI
>-rs>
I 4. t
>>.r
-
4 *
5
X4.-1
I.Ht>
SX1
>X5"
r
7.?*
4X
10
3><»
/•3r
i >S~
11
20
I
)
l&l
9)-.
>ac
r*
41
-------
Dilution impactor operation data sheet - MOUDI
Operator
Condition
Run Number
Date
Start time
Stop time
^
>/,»*»#re ±
JLl
an.
oclle+S
reikw
"f u«-t yitceA
Time
N2 Flow
(L/min)
Flow Meter
10
us
14.?
Duct T
. CO
i Mr
i
I Ml
SS?
Ti>o>
SiaO
Probe T
(°F)
13T
>3.5"
>3r
>34T
Bottom Mag NO MOUDI NO Stack
(in. WC) (ppm) (ppm)
$¦-»»
b
¦?/
>o
-------
Dilution impactor operation data sheet - MGUDI
Operator
Condition
Run Number
Date
Start time
Stop time
/ ^ V") /ft
h •*$( -r C*
R. X
JhJLizi.
I3N
_m±
Time
N2 Flow Flow Meter Duct T Probe T MOUDIT Pump T Top Mag Bottom Mag NO MOUDI NO Stack
0
a>3
f.HH
S" (»o
70
9 4
>ls-
V"- »»«/
S"
W¥*»l
¦a1)
5
24-3
l.HC
rte
1
11
> as*
Xs-
- ¦ ~ *-
-3 vf
10
Ifc 3
t-HL.
SLo
1 o°i
>as-
sr
If. 4 1
?sr
15
X& • 3
t-nr
5t(
1 0 4>
95"
ajr
sr
?. /o
r
92
20
It.*?
i.Hi
5-40
/ 0 3
9 4
f ¥
»s~
— ~ **
? 1
"*®**
I
1
-------
Dilution impactor operation data sheet - MOUDI
Operator
Condition
Run Number
Date
Start time
Stop time
L - ^ *Tb
10
Time
0
N2 Flow
(L/min)
Flow Meter
10
15
14.?
f.Hf
i.wr
>.wr
..wc
Duct T
fC)
5"bo
St 4
ri. t
S~*>o
S" t>o
Probe T
fF)
JU.
IOJ.
loO
MOUDI T PumpT Top Mag Bottom Mag NO MOUDI NO Stack
TEl CH {in, WC} (in. WC) (ppm) (ppm)
If
I ">
I/O
or
<»fc
<^<4
>sr
i»>.r
- ir
> ^
_£1
f.'t
fo
-------
Dilution impactor operation data sheet - MOUDI
Operator
Condition
Run Number
Date
Start time
Stop time
^lr^r«nl<
c<;
_Cc-Lii
AV
q-> -i»i*
HIT-
Time
N2 Flow Flow Meter
Duct T
Probe T MOUDI T Pump T Top Mag Bottom Mag NO MOUDI NO Stack
0
^•"5>
iwr
S"t >
i o> 1 m
\ 1 i
->zr
^11. vvu>
r
[pptiit
ippm)
6^
5
i .wsr
1 o ^
IX
f? _
>3s*
<7 /&
90
10
) ¦ M.Cs
ar
c~
ff.b*
7*0
15
},Hb
S"6/
9
i1 i
s*v
sr"
9.iu
-------
Dilution impactor operation data sheet - MOUDI
Operator
Condition
Run Number
Date
Start time
Stop time
L ¦ ^ I *
fl L~k 1
<=*>
(V
?-g
' S~o o
Time
N2 Flow Flow Meter Duct T Probe T MOUDI T PumpT Top Mag Bottom Mag NO MOUDI NO Stack
0| 16,^
i-NM
A/4-
7r
7- xr
S"
VFP""/
A*
A' 4-
5
i.4i
>?
~?r
"?r
>25*
r
1
10
i.SH
^ r
?r
•>ir
r
—r-
15
1, HI
>1
"?5T
>3c
r
1
20
4
i.HH
\J
>5-r
sr
s
r
i-
r
¦
-------
Dilution impactor operation data sheet - MOUDI
Operator L. V.rL^u
Condition + Cs # S,
Run Number £-1
Date g-y-i^
Start time ioxX.
Stop time
Time
N2 Flow Flow Meter
Duct T
Probe T MOUDI T Pump T Top Mag Bottom Mag NO MOUDI NO Stack
0
H- 3
°)o
90 lo
k" ¦> »•«-»
M
-70
s*
S"" H
10
Mm!
(.HS~
T6|
•fo
> ar
r
S". T"
*r
SIX
tO 6
°lo
<5 ©
»r
r-
C. f P
6^
20
U3
1 » i
9 0
>ar
— *¦* T
s* 73
6J*
-
"
-------
Dilution impactor operation data sheet - MOUDI
Operator
Condition
Run Number
Date
Start time
Stop time
¦* C% -»*
A/x
#* 0% £ «v
J. /»»« «. "J
3-1
i\-t-\%
"m
Time
N2 Flow Flow Meter Duct T Probe T MOUDI T Pump T Top Mag Bottom Mag NO MOUDI NO Stack
0
u.*
I.MS"
St 3
f ?
S*s-
5"
lPP"i|
•?/
5
2 fc.1
i. <4 r"
5feM
1 0 *
«Jr
s-
fc-F4
65"
10
Ifc.5
I.SS
,Tfe4
i OH
93,
>ar
r
$ x°
4 H
15
X6.1
,.*r
s *X
• 11
r
£
20
3LW
56 >
i
g6
QX
>ar
$*"
II. />
L3*
>
e> •".
/ <
. >yj
-------
Dilution impactor operation data sheet - MOUDI
Operator
Condition
Run Number
Date
Start time
Stop time
Time
I. ^irWr*>.wt*\
&">r—^ -»• <- N
"V?
N2 Flow Flow Meter Duct T Probe! MOUDI T Pump T Top Mag Bottom Mag NO MOUDI NO Stack
0
| Xfc-i
t.yf
17-
<9o
VM . -W,
> ar
V"'- "W
5*"
ipprn)
Gi
5
K-?
1 H
is
»r
s-*
j 4P*~r
10
at-5
1,44
as-
r
?.A?
20
14.?
i.Hi
J©?
f 3
r
A?
-------
Dilution impactor operation data sheet - MOUDI
Operator
Condition
Run Number
J Date
Start time
Stop time
i. • I V
r-uU . r
/rc-r
ix-y-1>
t
I h'V.S,
Time
M2 Flow Flow Meter Duct T Probe T MOUDI T Pump T Top Mag Bottom Mag NO MOUDI NO Stack
0
U\
i-Hi
A/4
•»
7t>
>'>.r
r
VKH"V
4/4
As jA
5
i. «-H
I
? o
>ir
10
J.H H
&¦ O
7f
5jr
15
1 • H*f
»1
?V
>*r
20
V
f
l.
i
k i
>1
> A->"
<>-
„
-------
vvEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
PRESORTED STANDARD
POSTAGE & FEES PAID
EPA
PERMIT NO. G-35
Office of Research and Development (8101R)
Washington, DC 20460
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use
$300
------- |