EPA 2020 COVID-19 WATER SECTOR SURVEY Appendix F: Data Tables for Alaska Native Village Utilities _ '*% N June 2021 ------- Notes on Appendix F Appendices C-G present tables with detailed findings from the EPA 2020 COVID-19 Water Sector Survey. This appendix, Appendix F, presents findings specifically for Alaska Native Village utilities. Each table includes findings for subgroups based on size (population served). The order of presentation in this appendix follows the order of questions in the survey (see Appendix B). The title of each table generally includes the applicable survey question number and the text of the question itself (or a close paraphrase). EPA used financial data from Part D of the survey to generate some derived measures. The tables presenting these measures are labeled as "calculated" rather than labelled with a question number. Some questions asked survey participants specifically about experiences from January 2020 to the present day, or from present day to December 2020. For these questions, "January to the Present" or "Present to December" is listed above each table to show the time period covered by the table. In most cases, findings are presented as point estimates and 95 percent confidence intervals. For an explanation of confidence intervals, see the discussion of methodology in Appendix A. Several questions asked respondents to provide responses on a scale. For example, questions Bl.1.1 and B2.1.1 asked respondents to rank the severity of their treatment chemical shortages as "no impact," "slight impact," "moderate impact," or "severe impact." EPA calculated a mean score for each such question by assigning numeric values to the responses (for example, 0 for no impact, 1 for slight impact, 2 for moderate impact, and 3 for severe impact) and averaging the results. Each table lists the number of observations, which is the number of responses received from survey participants to a given question or response option. The quantitative findings presented in the tables are weighted to provide national estimates, using weightings calculated and assigned to each utility type and size subgroup. For more information on the weightings, see the discussion of methodology in Appendix A. Blank cells indicate that no applicable responses were received. "N/A" indicates that a confidence interval cannot be calculated because there was no variance in responses. F-2 ------- Table F.l. Question Bl.l: What kinds of shortages or supply chain disruptions did your organization experience from January 2020 through present day? Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Chain Issue Percentage Reporting by Population Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Treatment Chemicals 48.0% 23.5% - 73.5% 7.7% 1.4% - 32.3% 22.3% 8.5% - 47.0% 53.9% 9.5% - 92.9% 27.1% 16.2% - 41.7% PPE 59.7% 31.0% - 83.0% 56.5% 31.5% - 78.5% 72.4% 47.7% - 88.3% 46.1% 7.1% - 90.5% 62.6% 47.6% - 75.5% Durable Goods and Other Equipment and Supplies 58.4% 30.7% - 81.6% 53.8% 28.1% - 77.7% 34.0% 16.4% - 57.6% 0.0% N/A - N/A 45.4% 31.4% - 60.2% None 31.2% 11.5% - 61.3% 25.6% 9.4% - 53.2% 27.6% 11.7% - 52.3% 0.0% N/A - N/A 26.7% 15.7% - 41.7% Observations 10 11 14 2 37 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-3 Table F.1 Page 1 of 1 ------- Table F.2. Question Bl.1.1: How severe were the treatment chemical shortages or supply chain disruptions that you experienced? Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Carbon dioxide Mean score (0 to 3) 0.091 -0.060 - 0.241 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.027 -0.020 - 0.074 No impact (0) 90.9% 61.8% - 98.4% 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 97.3% 85.7% - 99.5% Slight (1) 9.1% 1.6% - 38.2% 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 2.7% 0.5% - 14.3% Moderate (2) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Severe(3) Observations 10 11 14 2 37 Ferric chloride Mean score (0 to 3) 0.091 -0.060 - 0.241 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.027 -0.020 - 0.074 No impact (0) 90.9% 61.8% - 98.4% 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 97.3% 85.7% - 99.5% Slight (1) 9.1% 1.6% - 38.2% 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 2.7% 0.5% - 14.3% Moderate (2) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Severe(3) Observations 10 11 14 2 37 F-4 Table F.2 Page 1 of 6 ------- Table F.2. Question Bl.1.1: How severe were the treatment chemical shortages or supply chain disruptions that you experienced? Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Chain Issue Response Percentage Reporting by Population Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Fluoride Mean score (0 to 3) 0.091 -0.060 - 0.241 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.149 -0.106 - 0.404 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.080 -0.022 - 0.182 No impact (0) 90.9% 61.8% - 98.4% 100.0% N/A - N/A 92.6% 66.1% - 98.8% 100.0% N/A - N/A 94.7% 83.3% - 98.4% Slight (1) 9.1% 1.6% - 38.2% 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 2.7% 0.5% - 14.3% Moderate (2) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 7.4% 1.2% - 33.9% 0.0% N/A - N/A 2.7% 0.5% - 14.3% Severe(3) Observations 10 11 14 2 37 Gaseous chlorine Mean score (0 to 3) 0.195 -0.032 - 0.422 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.074 -0.053 - 0.202 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.084 0.000 - 0.168 No impact (0) 80.5% 49.3% - 94.6% 100.0% N/A - N/A 92.6% 66.1% - 98.8% 100.0% N/A - N/A 91.6% 78.5% - 97.0% Slight (1) 19.5% 5.4% - 50.7% 0.0% N/A - N/A 7.4% 1.2% - 33.9% 0.0% N/A - N/A 8.4% 3.0% - 21.5% Moderate (2) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Severe(3) Observations 10 11 14 2 37 F-5 Table F.2 Page 2 of 6 ------- Table F.2. Question Bl.1.1: How severe were the treatment chemical shortages or supply chain disruptions that you experienced? Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Chain Issue Response Percentage Reporting by Population Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Liquid oxygen Mean score (0 to 3) 0.091 -0.060 - 0.241 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.027 -0.020 - 0.074 No impact (0) 90.9% 61.8% - 98.4% 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 97.3% 85.7% - 99.5% Slight (1) 9.1% 1.6% - 38.2% 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 2.7% 0.5% - 14.3% Moderate (2) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Severe(3) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 10 11 14 2 37 Lime Mean score (0 to 3) 0.091 -0.060 - 0.241 0.153 -0.094 - 0.401 0.149 -0.106 - 0.404 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.126 -0.001 - 0.253 No impact (0) 90.9% 61.8% - 98.4% 92.3% 67.7% - 98.6% 92.6% 66.1% - 98.8% 100.0% N/A - N/A 92.4% 80.8% - 97.2% Slight (1) 9.1% 1.6% - 38.2% 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 2.7% 0.5% - 14.3% Moderate (2) 0.0% N/A - N/A 7.7% 1.4% - 32.3% 7.4% 1.2% - 33.9% 0.0% N/A - N/A 5.0% 1.4% - 15.8% Severe(3) Observations 10 11 14 2 37 F-6 Table F.2 Page 3 of 6 ------- Table F.2. Question Bl.1.1: How severe were the treatment chemical shortages or supply chain disruptions that you experienced? Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Chain Issue Response Percentage Reporting by Population Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Orthophosphate Mean score (0 to 3) 0.091 -0.060 - 0.241 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.027 -0.020 - 0.074 No impact (0) 90.9% 61.8% - 98.4% 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 97.3% 85.7% - 99.5% Slight (1) 9.1% 1.6% - 38.2% 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 2.7% 0.5% - 14.3% Moderate (2) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Severe(3) Observations 10 11 14 2 37 Polymers Mean score (0 to 3) 0.091 -0.060 - 0.241 0.153 -0.094 - 0.401 0.298 0.016 - 0.580 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.179 0.042 - 0.316 No impact (0) 90.9% 61.8% - 98.4% 92.3% 67.7% - 98.6% 77.7% 53.0% - 91.5% 100.0% N/A - N/A 87.0% 74.6% - 93.9% Slight (1) 9.1% 1.6% - 38.2% 0.0% N/A - N/A 14.9% 4.4% - 40.1% 0.0% N/A - N/A 8.0% 3.0% - 19.7% Moderate (2) 0.0% N/A - N/A 7.7% 1.4% - 32.3% 7.4% 1.2% - 33.9% 0.0% N/A - N/A 5.0% 1.4% - 15.8% Severe(3) Observations 10 11 14 2 37 F-7 Table F.2 Page 4 of 6 ------- Table F.2. Question Bl.1.1: How severe were the treatment chemical shortages or supply chain disruptions that you experienced? Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Chain Issue Response Percentage Reporting by Population Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Potassium permanganate Mean score (0 to 3) 0.299 -0.084 - 0.682 0.153 -0.094 - 0.401 0.074 -0.053 - 0.202 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.160 0.013 - 0.308 No impact (0) 80.5% 49.3% - 94.6% 92.3% 67.7% - 98.6% 92.6% 66.1% - 98.8% 100.0% N/A - N/A 89.3% 76.1% - 95.6% Slight (1) 9.1% 1.6% - 38.2% 0.0% N/A - N/A 7.4% 1.2% - 33.9% 0.0% N/A - N/A 5.3% 1.6% - 16.7% Moderate (2) 10.4% 1.6% - 44.9% 7.7% 1.4% - 32.3% 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 5.3% 1.5% - 17.3% Severe(3) Observations 10 11 14 2 37 Sodium hydroxide Mean score (0 to 3) 0.091 -0.060 - 0.241 0.153 -0.094 - 0.401 0.074 -0.053 - 0.202 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.099 0.000 - 0.198 No impact (0) 90.9% 61.8% - 98.4% 92.3% 67.7% - 98.6% 92.6% 66.1% - 98.8% 100.0% N/A - N/A 92.4% 80.8% - 97.2% Slight (1) 9.1% 1.6% - 38.2% 0.0% N/A - N/A 7.4% 1.2% - 33.9% 0.0% N/A - N/A 5.3% 1.6% - 16.7% Moderate (2) 0.0% N/A - N/A 7.7% 1.4% - 32.3% 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 2.3% 0.4% - 11.3% Severe(3) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 10 11 14 2 37 F-8 Table F.2 Page 5 of 6 ------- Table F.2. Question Bl.1.1: How severe were the treatment chemical shortages or supply chain disruptions that you experienced? Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Sodium Mean score (0 to 3) 0.091 0.000 0.074 0.000 0.053 hypochlorite -0.060 - 0.241 0.000 - 0.000 -0.053 - 0.202 0.000 - 0.000 -0.011 - 0.118 No impact (0) 90.9% 100.0% 92.6% 100.0% 94.7% 61.8% - 98.4% N/A - N/A 66.1% - 98.8% N/A - N/A 83.3% - 98.4% Slight (1) 9.1% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% 5.3% 1.6% - 38.2% N/A - N/A 1.2% - 33.9% N/A - N/A 1.6% - 16.7% Moderate (2) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Severe(3) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 10 11 14 2 37 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-9 Table F.2 Page 6 of 6 ------- Table F.3. Question Bl.1.2: What contributed to each shortage or supply chain disruption? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Chain Issue Response Percentage Reporting by Population Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Carbon dioxide Unavailable from supplier(s) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Delayed / backordered from supplier(s) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Transportation / distribution difficulties 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A Price 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 1 1 Ferric chloride Unavailable from supplier(s) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Delayed / backordered from supplier(s) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Transportation / distribution difficulties 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A Price 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 1 1 F-10 Table F.3 Page 1 of 6 ------- Table F.3. Question Bl.1.2: What contributed to each shortage or supply chain disruption? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Chain Issue Response Percentage Reporting by Population Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Fluoride Unavailable from supplier(s) 0.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 50.0% 0.2% - 99.8% Delayed / backordered from supplier(s) 0.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 50.0% 0.2% - 99.8% Transportation / distribution difficulties 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A Price 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 1 1 2 Gaseous chlorine Unavailable from supplier(s) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Delayed / backordered from supplier(s) 53.4% 11.7% - 90.8% 0.0% N/A - N/A 36.4% 36.4% - 36.4% Transportation / distribution difficulties 46.6% 9.2% - 88.3% 100.0% N/A - N/A 63.6% 63.6% - 63.6% Price 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 2 1 3 F-11 Table F.3 Page 2 of 6 ------- Table F.3. Question Bl.1.2: What contributed to each shortage or supply chain disruption? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Liquid Unavailable from 0.0% 0.0% oxygen supplier(s) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Delayed / backordered 0.0% 0.0% from supplier(s) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Transportation / 100.0% 100.0% distribution difficulties N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Price 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 1 1 Lime Unavailable from 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% supplier(s) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Delayed / backordered 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% from supplier(s) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Transportation / 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 70.0% distribution difficulties N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 70.0% - 70.0% Price 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 30.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 30.0% - 30.0% Other 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 35.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.1% - 96.4% Observations 1 1 1 3 F-12 Table F.3 Page 3 of 6 ------- Table F.3. Question Bl.1.2: What contributed to each shortage or supply chain disruption? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Orthophosphate Unavailable from supplier(s) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Delayed / backordered 0.0% 0.0% from supplier(s) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Transportation / 100.0% 100.0% distribution difficulties N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Price 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 1 1 Polymers Unavailable from 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% supplier(s) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Delayed / backordered 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% from supplier(s) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Transportation / 100.0% 0.0% 66.7% 61.8% distribution difficulties N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 9.8% - 97.4% 21.1% - 90.7% Price 0.0% 100.0% 33.3% 38.2% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.6% - 90.2% 9.3% - 78.9% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 1 1 3 5 F-13 Table F.3 Page 4 of 6 ------- Table F.3. Question Bl.1.2: What contributed to each shortage or supply chain disruption? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Potassium Unavailable from 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% permanganate supplier(s) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Delayed / backordered 53.4% 0.0% 0.0% 28.7% from supplier(s) 9.3% - 92.8% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 28.7% - 28.7% Transportation / 46.6% 0.0% 100.0% 50.0% distribution difficulties 7.2% - 90.7% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 50.0% - 50.0% Price 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 21.4% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 21.4% - 21.4% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 2 1 1 4 Sodium Unavailable from 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% hydroxide supplier(s) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Delayed / backordered 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% from supplier(s) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Transportation / 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 70.0% distribution difficulties N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 70.0% - 70.0% Price 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 30.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 30.0% - 30.0% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 1 1 1 3 F-14 Table F.3 Page 5 of 6 ------- Table F.3. Question Bl.1.2: What contributed to each shortage or supply chain disruption? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Sodium Unavailable from 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% hypochlorite supplier(s) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Delayed / backordered 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% from supplier(s) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Transportation / 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% distribution difficulties N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Price 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 1 1 2 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-15 Table F.3 Page 6 of 6 ------- Table F.4. Question Bl.1.3: How did you address each shortage or supply chain disruption? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Chain Issue Response Percentage Reporting by Population Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Carbon dioxide Found alternative supplier 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Drew down existing inventory 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Switched chemicals, procedures, or technologies 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A Sought help from other utilities or mutual aid network (e.g., WARN) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Coordinated with local or state emergency management agency 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 1 1 2 Ferric chloride Found alternative supplier 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Drew down existing inventory 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Switched chemicals, procedures, or technologies 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A Sought help from other utilities or mutual aid network (e.g., WARN) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Coordinated with local or state emergency management agency 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 1 1 2 F-16 Table F.4 Page 1 of 6 ------- Table F.4. Question Bl.1.3: How did you address each shortage or supply chain disruption? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Chain Issue Response Percentage Reporting by Population Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Fluoride Found alternative supplier 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Drew down existing inventory 0.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 50.0% 1.8% - 98.2% Switched chemicals, procedures, or technologies 100.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 50.0% 1.8% - 98.2% Sought help from other utilities or mutual aid network (e.g., WARN) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Coordinated with local or state emergency management agency 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 1 1 2 Gaseous chlorine Found alternative supplier 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Drew down existing inventory 53.4% 14.0% - 89.0% 100.0% N/A - N/A 68.2% 14.6% - 96.4% Switched chemicals, procedures, or technologies 46.6% 11.0% - 86.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A 31.8% 3.6% - 85.4% Sought help from other utilities or mutual aid network (e.g., WARN) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Coordinated with local or state emergency management agency 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 2 2 4 F-17 Table F.4 Page 2 of 6 ------- Table F.4. Question Bl.1.3: How did you address each shortage or supply chain disruption? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Liquid Found alternative supplier 0.0% 0.0% oxygen N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Drew down existing inventory 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Switched chemicals, procedures, or 100.0% 100.0% technologies N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Sought help from other utilities 0.0% 0.0% or mutual aid network (e.g., WARN) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Coordinated with local or state 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% emergency management agency N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 1 1 2 Lime Found alternative supplier 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Drew down existing inventory 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 35.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.4% - 92.1% Switched chemicals, procedures, or 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 35.0% technologies N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.4% - 92.1% Sought help from other utilities 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 30.0% or mutual aid network (e.g., WARN) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 30.0% - 30.0% Coordinated with local or state 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% emergency management agency N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 2 1 1 3 F-18 Table F.4 Page 3 of 6 ------- Table F.4. Question Bl.1.3: How did you address each shortage or supply chain disruption? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Orthophos- Found alternative supplier 0.0% 0.0% phate N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Drew down existing inventory 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Switched chemicals, procedures, or 100.0% 100.0% technologies N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Sought help from other utilities 0.0% 0.0% or mutual aid network (e.g., WARN) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Coordinated with local or state 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% emergency management agency N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 1 1 2 Polymers Found alternative supplier 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Drew down existing inventory 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 41.2% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 12.5% - 96.5% 10.1% - 81.4% Switched chemicals, procedures, or 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 20.6% technologies N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.4% - 73.1% Sought help from other utilities 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 17.6% or mutual aid network (e.g., WARN) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 11.7% - 25.7% Coordinated with local or state 0.0% 0.0% 19.4% 10.4% emergency management agency N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.2% - 72.2% 1.3% - 50.0% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 3 1 5 9 F-19 Table F.4 Page 4 of 6 ------- Table F.4. Question Bl.1.3: How did you address each shortage or supply chain disruption? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Potassium Found alternative supplier 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% perman- N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A ganate Drew down existing inventory 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 25.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.2% - 82.9% Switched chemicals, procedures, or 46.6% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% technologies 10.5% - 86.6% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.2% - 82.9% Sought help from other utilities 53.4% 100.0% 0.0% 50.0% or mutual aid network (e.g., WARN) 13.4% - 89.5% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 50.0% - 50.0% Coordinated with local or state 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% emergency management agency N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 2 1 1 4 Sodium Found alternative supplier 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% hydroxide N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Drew down existing inventory 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 35.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.4% - 92.0% Switched chemicals, procedures, or 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 35.0% technologies N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.4% - 92.0% Sought help from other utilities 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 30.0% or mutual aid network (e.g., WARN) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 30.0% - 30.0% Coordinated with local or state 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% emergency management agency N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 2 1 1 3 F-20 Table F.4 Page 5 of 6 ------- Table F.4. Question Bl.1.3: How did you address each shortage or supply chain disruption? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Sodium Found alternative supplier 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% hypochlorite N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Drew down existing inventory 0.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 50.0% 4.1% - 95.9% Switched chemicals, procedures, or 100.0% 0.0% 50.0% technologies N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 4.1% - 95.9% Sought help from other utilities 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% or mutual aid network (e.g., WARN) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Coordinated with local or state 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% emergency management agency N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 1 2 3 6 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-21 Table F.4 Page 6 of 6 ------- Table F.5. Question Bl.2.1: How severe were the personal protective equipment shortages or supply chain disruptions that you experienced? Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All N95 masks Mean score (0 to 3) 0.896 0.770 1.213 0.461 0.951 and/or 0.338 - 1.454 0.315 - 1.226 0.624 - 1.802 -0.139 - 1.061 0.640 - 1.261 elastomeric No impact (0) 40.3% 52.5% 41.5% 53.9% 45.0% respirators 17.0% - 69.0% 28.8% - 75.2% 21.4% - 64.9% 9.5% - 92.9% 31.4% - 59.4% Slight (1) 40.3% 18.0% 23.4% 46.1% 27.9% 17.0% - 69.0% 5.2% - 46.7% 8.9% - 48.9% 7.1% - 90.5% 16.8% - 42.6% Moderate (2) 9.1% 29.5% 7.4% 0.0% 14.1% 1.6% - 38.2% 11.3% - 58.0% 1.2% - 33.9% N/A - N/A 6.5% - 28.2% Severe(3) 10.4% 0.0% 27.6% 0.0% 13.0% 1.6% - 44.9% N/A - N/A 11.7% - 52.3% N/A - N/A 5.9% - 26.1% Observations 10 11 14 2 37 Alternative Mean score (0 to 3) 0.883 0.591 0.968 0.461 0.805 mask 0.418 - 1.348 0.187 - 0.995 0.416 - 1.519 -0.139 - 1.061 0.526 - 1.085 options No impact (0) 40.3% 61.5% 51.1% 53.9% 51.1% (surgical, 17.0% - 69.0% 37.1% - 81.2% 28.6% - 73.1% 9.5% - 92.9% 37.1% - 65.0% cloth, etc.) Slight (1) 31.2% 18.0% 21.3% 46.1% 24.4% 11.5% - 61.3% 5.2% - 46.7% 7.7% - 46.6% 7.1% - 90.5% 14.2% - 38.8% Moderate (2) 28.5% 20.6% 7.4% 0.0% 17.2% 10.6% - 57.4% 6.4% - 49.4% 1.2% - 33.9% N/A - N/A 8.6% - 31.6% Severe(3) 0.0% 0.0% 20.2% 0.0% 7.2% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 7.5% - 44.1% N/A - N/A 2.7% - 17.7% Observations 10 11 14 2 37 F-22 Table F.5 Page 1 of 3 ------- Table F.5. Question Bl.2.1: How severe were the personal protective equipment shortages or supply chain disruptions that you experienced? Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Face shield Mean score (0 to 3) 1.000 0.565 0.851 0.000 0.767 and/or 0.405 - 1.595 0.128 - 1.001 0.362 - 1.340 0.000 - 0.000 0.482 - 1.052 protective No impact (0) 40.3% 62.8% 48.9% 100.0% 53.0% eye wear 17.0% - 69.0% 35.7% - 83.7% 26.9% - 71.4% N/A - N/A 38.6% - 67.0% Slight (1) 29.9% 18.0% 30.9% 0.0% 25.2% 10.6% - 60.4% 5.2% - 46.7% 13.9% - 55.4% N/A - N/A 14.5% - 40.2% Moderate (2) 19.5% 19.3% 6.4% 0.0% 13.7% 5.4% - 50.7% 5.4% - 49.7% 1.2% - 28.4% N/A - N/A 6.2% - 27.8% Severe(3) 10.4% 0.0% 13.8% 0.0% 8.0% 1.6% - 44.9% N/A - N/A 3.9% - 38.7% N/A - N/A 2.8% - 20.8% Observations 10 11 14 2 37 Nitrile Mean score (0 to 3) 1.000 1.026 1.000 0.922 1.004 and/or latex 0.472 - 1.528 0.529 - 1.524 0.558 - 1.442 -0.277 - 2.122 0.731 - 1.277 gloves No impact (0) 40.3% 43.5% 35.1% 53.9% 40.1% 17.0% - 69.0% 21.5% - 68.5% 16.6% - 59.6% 9.5% - 92.9% 26.9% - 54.9% Slight (1) 19.5% 10.3% 37.3% 0.0% 22.1% 5.4% - 50.7% 1.7% - 42.9% 18.0% - 61.6% N/A - N/A 12.1% - 37.1% Moderate (2) 40.3% 46.2% 20.2% 46.1% 35.1% 17.0% - 69.0% 22.3% - 71.9% 7.5% - 44.1% 7.1% - 90.5% 22.7% - 49.9% Severe(3) 0.0% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% 2.7% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.2% - 33.9% N/A - N/A 0.5% - 14.3% Observations 10 11 14 2 37 F-23 Table F.5 Page 2 of 3 ------- Table F.5. Question Bl.2.1: How severe were the personal protective equipment shortages or supply chain disruptions that you experienced? Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Tyvek suite Mean score (0 to 3) 0.805 0.641 0.713 0.000 0.683 and/or 0.231 - 1.380 0.171 - 1.112 0.259 - 1.167 0.000 - 0.000 0.410 - 0.957 disposable No impact (0) 49.3% 62.8% 56.4% 100.0% 58.4% coveralls 23.3% - 75.7% 35.7% - 83.7% 32.9% - 77.3% N/A - N/A 44.0% - 71.4% Slight (1) 31.2% 10.3% 23.4% 0.0% 20.6% 11.5% - 61.3% 1.7% - 42.9% 8.9% - 48.9% N/A - N/A 11.5% - 34.3% Moderate (2) 9.1% 26.9% 12.7% 0.0% 15.3% 1.6% - 38.2% 9.7% - 55.7% 4.1% - 33.4% N/A - N/A 7.6% - 28.2% Severe(3) 10.4% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% 5.7% 1.6% - 44.9% N/A - N/A 1.2% - 33.9% N/A - N/A 1.6% - 18.7% Observations 10 11 14 2 37 Sanitizing Mean score (0 to 3) 1.403 0.847 1.287 0.922 1.172 wipes, 0.637 - 2.168 0.367 - 1.327 0.691 - 1.883 -0.277 - 2.122 0.821 - 1.523 sprays for No impact (0) 40.3% 52.5% 41.5% 53.9% 45.0% cleaning 17.0% - 69.0% 28.8% - 75.2% 21.4% - 64.9% 9.5% - 92.9% 31.4% - 59.4% work Slight (1) 10.4% 10.3% 16.0% 0.0% 11.9% offices, or 1.6% - 44.9% 1.7% - 42.9% 4.7% - 42.3% N/A - N/A 5.1% - 25.3% gels for Moderate (2) 18.1% 37.2% 14.9% 46.1% 24.0% hand 5.7% - 44.6% 16.3% - 64.3% 4.4% - 40.1% 7.1% - 90.5% 13.6% - 38.8% sanitizing Severe(3) 31.2% 0.0% 27.6% 0.0% 19.1% 11.5% - 61.3% N/A - N/A 11.7% - 52.3% N/A - N/A 10.0% - 33.5% Observations 10 11 14 2 37 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-24 Table F.5 Page 3 of 3 ------- Table F.6. Question Bl.2.2: What contributed to each shortage or supply chain disruption? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All N95 masks Unavailable from 52.2% 100.0% 74.5% 100.0% 75.0% and/or supplier(s) 19.9% - 82.8% N/A - N/A 37.9% - 93.4% N/A - N/A 54.6% - 88.2% elastomeric Delayed / backordered 50.0% 21.7% 49.1% 0.0% 40.3% respirators from supplier(s) 16.6% - 83.4% 3.1% - 70.5% 19.2% - 79.6% N/A - N/A 21.5% - 62.4% Transportation / 32.6% 0.0% 36.3% 0.0% 24.3% distribution difficulties 8.1% - 72.5% N/A - N/A 11.7% - 71.2% N/A - N/A 10.6% - 46.6% Price 15.2% 0.0% 21.8% 0.0% 13.2% 2.3% - 57.7% N/A - N/A 7.8% - 47.8% N/A - N/A 4.8% - 31.3% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 6 5 8 1 20 Alternative Unavailable from 34.8% 73.3% 56.5% 0.0% 50.0% mask supplier(s) 9.2% - 73.7% 21.8% - 96.4% 21.5% - 86.0% N/A - N/A 28.2% - 71.8% options Delayed / backordered 67.4% 26.7% 71.7% 100.0% 60.9% (surgical, from supplier(s) 26.7% - 92.2% 3.6% - 78.2% 31.5% - 93.4% N/A - N/A 36.9% - 80.6% cloth, etc.) Transportation / 32.6% 0.0% 30.5% 0.0% 22.7% distribution difficulties 7.8% - 73.3% N/A - N/A 8.2% - 68.1% N/A - N/A 9.4% - 45.1% Price 15.2% 0.0% 13.0% 0.0% 10.1% 2.2% - 58.5% N/A - N/A 2.0% - 52.1% N/A - N/A 2.6% - 32.7% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 6 4 7 1 18 F-25 Table F.6 Page 1 of 3 ------- Table F.6. Question Bl.2.2: What contributed to each shortage or supply chain disruption? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Face shield Unavailable from 52.2% 72.4% 14.6% 42.3% and/or supplier(s) 19.7% - 83.0% 21.7% - 96.1% 2.0% - 59.2% 21.7% - 66.0% protective Delayed / backordered 50.0% 27.6% 60.5% 48.8% eye wear from supplier(s) 16.2% - 83.8% 3.9% - 78.3% 28.4% - 85.5% 27.7% - 70.4% Transportation / 32.6% 0.0% 41.6% 28.4% distribution difficulties 7.9% - 73.1% N/A - N/A 12.9% - 77.5% 12.2% - 53.2% Price 15.2% 0.0% 12.5% 10.5% 2.3% - 58.0% N/A - N/A 1.7% - 53.3% 2.6% - 34.3% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 6 4 7 17 Nitrile Unavailable from 34.8% 65.9% 32.8% 0.0% 41.4% and/or latex supplier(s) 9.4% - 73.3% 26.2% - 91.3% 10.8% - 66.2% N/A - N/A 23.2% - 62.3% gloves Delayed / backordered 82.6% 34.1% 67.2% 100.0% 63.7% from supplier(s) 36.4% - 97.5% 8.7% - 73.8% 33.8% - 89.2% N/A - N/A 42.2% - 80.8% Transportation / 0.0% 0.0% 42.6% 0.0% 16.5% distribution difficulties N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 16.9% - 73.1% N/A - N/A 6.8% - 34.9% Price 15.2% 0.0% 9.8% 0.0% 8.3% 2.3% - 57.3% N/A - N/A 1.5% - 43.2% N/A - N/A 2.1% - 27.0% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 6 6 9 1 22 F-26 Table F.6 Page 2 of 3 ------- Table F.6. Question Bl.2.2: What contributed to each shortage or supply chain disruption? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Tyvek suite Unavailable from 61.6% 72.4% 17.1% 47.7% and/or supplier(s) 21.4% - 90.4% 21.7% - 96.1% 2.2% - 65.5% 24.0% - 72.5% disposable Delayed / backordered 58.9% 27.6% 51.2% 47.7% coveralls from supplier(s) 19.1% - 89.7% 3.9% - 78.3% 23.8% - 77.9% 26.8% - 69.5% Transportation / 0.0% 0.0% 31.7% 11.9% distribution difficulties N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 6.8% - 74.6% 2.9% - 38.2% Price 17.9% 0.0% 19.6% 13.8% 2.8% - 62.2% N/A - N/A 3.4% - 63.0% 3.3% - 42.8% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 5 4 6 15 Sanitizing Unavailable from 52.2% 56.7% 87.3% 100.0% 68.7% wipes, supplier(s) 19.9% - 82.8% 19.0% - 87.9% 45.5% - 98.3% N/A - N/A 46.4% - 84.8% sprays for Delayed / backordered 47.8% 43.3% 50.9% 0.0% 45.8% cleaning from supplier(s) 17.2% - 80.1% 12.1% - 81.0% 20.4% - 80.8% N/A - N/A 25.9% - 67.2% work Transportation / 0.0% 0.0% 36.3% 0.0% 13.9% offices, or distribution difficulties N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 11.7% - 71.2% N/A - N/A 4.7% - 34.4% gels for Price 32.6% 0.0% 10.9% 0.0% 14.6% hand 8.1% - 72.5% N/A - N/A 1.7% - 46.6% N/A - N/A 4.6% - 37.4% sanitizing Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 6 5 8 1 20 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-27 Table F.6 Page 3 of 3 ------- Table F.7. Question Bl.2.3: How did you address each shortage or supply chain disruption? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All N95 masks Found alternative supplier 17.4% 37.8% 27.3% 0.0% 25.7% and/or 2.5% - 63.6% 9.5% - 78.0% 7.4% - 63.8% N/A - N/A 11.3% - 48.4% elastomeric Drew down existing inventory 32.6% 21.7% 40.0% 100.0% 35.4% respirators 8.1% - 72.5% 3.1% - 70.5% 14.2% - 72.9% N/A - N/A 17.7% - 58.3% Switched chemicals, procedures, or 32.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10.4% technologies 8.1% - 72.5% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.6% - 33.5% Sought help from neighboring utilities 17.4% 0.0% 12.7% 0.0% 10.4% or mutual aid network (e.g., WARN) 2.5% - 63.6% N/A - N/A 1.7% - 54.5% N/A - N/A 2.6% - 33.5% Coordinated with local or state 0.0% 40.5% 23.6% 0.0% 19.4% emergency management agency N/A - N/A 10.5% - 79.8% 5.7% - 61.1% N/A - N/A 7.4% - 42.3% Other 17.4% 18.9% 23.6% 0.0% 19.4% 2.5% - 63.6% 2.9% - 64.1% 5.7% - 61.1% N/A - N/A 7.4% - 42.3% Observations 6 5 8 1 20 Alternative Found alternative supplier 32.6% 46.6% 41.3% 0.0% 37.5% mask 7.8% - 73.3% 11.1% - 85.9% 13.8% - 75.5% N/A - N/A 18.8% - 60.9% options Drew down existing inventory 34.8% 0.0% 30.5% 100.0% 28.1% (surgical, 9.2% - 73.7% N/A - N/A 8.2% - 68.1% N/A - N/A 11.9% - 53.2% cloth, etc.) Switched chemicals, procedures, or 32.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.7% technologies 7.8% - 73.3% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.9% - 37.3% Sought help from neighboring utilities 34.8% 26.7% 0.0% 0.0% 18.8% or mutual aid network (e.g., WARN) 9.2% - 73.7% 3.6% - 78.2% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 7.3% - 40.4% Coordinated with local or state 30.4% 26.7% 28.3% 0.0% 27.3% emergency management agency 10.0% - 63.1% 3.6% - 78.2% 6.6% - 68.5% N/A - N/A 12.1% - 50.6% Other 0.0% 0.0% 28.3% 0.0% 10.1% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 6.6% - 68.5% N/A - N/A 2.6% - 32.7% Observations 6 4 7 1 18 F-28 Table F.7 Page 1 of 3 ------- Table F.7. Question Bl.2.3: How did you address each shortage or supply chain disruption? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Face shield Found alternative supplier 17.4% 48.3% 14.6% 23.6% and/or 2.4% - 64.5% 11.6% - 86.9% 2.0% - 59.2% 8.8% - 49.7% protective Drew down existing inventory 32.6% 0.0% 72.9% 40.6% eye wear 7.9% - 73.1% N/A - N/A 32.4% - 93.8% 20.5% - 64.5% Switched chemicals, procedures, or 32.6% 0.0% 0.0% 12.2% technologies 7.9% - 73.1% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 3.0% - 38.5% Sought help from neighboring utilities 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% or mutual aid network (e.g., WARN) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Coordinated with local or state 0.0% 27.6% 0.0% 6.5% emergency management agency N/A - N/A 3.9% - 78.3% N/A - N/A 1.0% - 33.5% Other 17.4% 24.1% 12.5% 17.1% 2.4% - 64.5% 3.6% - 72.9% 1.7% - 53.3% 5.3% - 43.2% Observations 6 4 7 17 Nitrile Found alternative supplier 32.6% 31.8% 55.8% 0.0% 40.1% and/or latex 8.2% - 72.3% 8.3% - 70.7% 25.7% - 82.1% N/A - N/A 22.4% - 60.9% gloves Drew down existing inventory 32.6% 0.0% 47.6% 100.0% 31.8% 8.2% - 72.3% N/A - N/A 21.5% - 75.1% N/A - N/A 16.2% - 53.1% Switched chemicals, procedures, or 17.4% 0.0% 9.8% 0.0% 8.9% technologies 2.5% - 63.6% N/A - N/A 1.5% - 43.2% N/A - N/A 2.3% - 28.9% Sought help from neighboring utilities 17.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.1% or mutual aid network (e.g., WARN) 2.5% - 63.6% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 0.8% - 27.0% Coordinated with local or state 0.0% 52.3% 0.0% 0.0% 14.7% emergency management agency N/A - N/A 18.5% - 84.2% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 5.0% - 35.9% Other 17.4% 31.8% 0.0% 0.0% 14.0% 2.5% - 63.6% 9.7% - 66.9% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 4.7% - 35.0% Observations 6 6 9 1 22 F-29 Table F.7 Page 2 of 3 ------- Table F.7. Question Bl.2.3: How did you address each shortage or supply chain disruption? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Tyvek suite Found alternative supplier 20.5% 48.3% 34.2% 33.0% and/or 2.7% - 70.5% 11.5% - 87.0% 9.3% - 72.4% 15.6% - 56.9% disposable Drew down existing inventory 0.0% 0.0% 36.7% 13.8% coveralls N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 9.8% - 75.6% 3.3% - 42.8% Switched chemicals, procedures, or 38.4% 0.0% 14.6% 19.3% technologies 9.6% - 78.6% N/A - N/A 2.0% - 59.1% 5.8% - 47.9% Sought help from neighboring utilities 20.5% 0.0% 17.1% 13.8% or mutual aid network (e.g., WARN) 2.7% - 70.5% N/A - N/A 2.2% - 65.5% 3.3% - 42.8% Coordinated with local or state 0.0% 27.6% 17.1% 13.8% emergency management agency N/A - N/A 3.9% - 78.3% 2.2% - 65.5% 3.3% - 42.8% Other 20.5% 24.1% 0.0% 13.8% 2.7% - 70.5% 3.5% - 73.4% N/A - N/A 3.3% - 42.8% Observations 5 4 6 15 Sanitizing Found alternative supplier 50.0% 37.8% 27.3% 0.0% 36.1% wipes, 16.6% - 83.4% 9.5% - 78.0% 7.4% - 63.8% N/A - N/A 18.6% - 58.3% sprays for Drew down existing inventory 50.0% 0.0% 40.0% 0.0% 31.3% cleaning 16.6% - 83.4% N/A - N/A 14.2% - 72.9% N/A - N/A 15.2% - 53.6% work Switched chemicals, procedures, or 17.4% 0.0% 23.6% 100.0% 18.7% offices, or technologies 2.5% - 63.6% N/A - N/A 5.7% - 61.1% N/A - N/A 7.4% - 40.1% gels for Sought help from neighboring utilities 34.8% 21.7% 0.0% 0.0% 16.7% hand or mutual aid network (e.g., WARN) 9.4% - 73.3% 3.1% - 70.5% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 6.4% - 36.9% sanitizing Coordinated with local or state 0.0% 40.5% 12.7% 0.0% 15.3% emergency management agency N/A - N/A 10.5% - 79.8% 1.7% - 54.5% N/A - N/A 5.1% - 37.7% Other 0.0% 18.9% 21.8% 0.0% 13.2% N/A - N/A 2.9% - 64.1% 7.8% - 47.8% N/A - N/A 4.8% - 31.3% Observations 6 5 8 1 20 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-30 Table F.7 Page 3 of 3 ------- Table F.8. Question Bl.3.1: How severe were the shortages or supply chain disruptions involving durable goods and other critical equipment that you experienced? Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Filter media Mean score (0 to 3) 0.413 0.179 0.298 0.000 0.278 0.050 - 0.777 -0.129 - 0.487 -0.095 - 0.691 0.000 - 0.000 0.082 - 0.475 No impact (0) 68.6% 91.0% 85.1% 100.0% 83.1% 39.1% - 88.2% 60.6% - 98.5% 59.6% - 95.7% N/A - N/A 69.4% - 91.5% Slight (1) 21.4% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% 8.6% 5.9% - 54.1% N/A - N/A 1.2% - 34.2% N/A - N/A 3.0% - 22.1% Moderate (2) 10.0% 9.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.5% 1.7% - 40.8% 1.5% - 39.4% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.6% - 17.3% Severe (3) 0.0% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% 2.7% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.2% - 34.2% N/A - N/A 0.5% - 14.8% Observations 9 11 14 2 36 Granular/ Mean score (0 to 3) 0.214 0.000 0.223 0.000 0.141 Powdered -0.032 - 0.460 0.000 - 0.000 -0.051 - 0.498 0.000 - 0.000 0.016 - 0.267 Activated No impact (0) 78.6% 100.0% 85.1% 100.0% 88.6% Carbon (GAC/ 45.9% - 94.1% N/A - N/A 59.6% - 95.7% N/A - N/A 75.0% - 95.3% PAC) Slight (1) 21.4% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% 8.6% 5.9% - 54.1% N/A - N/A 1.2% - 34.2% N/A - N/A 3.0% - 22.1% Moderate (2) 0.0% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% 2.7% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.2% - 34.2% N/A - N/A 0.5% - 14.8% Severe (3) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 9 11 14 2 36 F-31 Table F.8 Page 1 of 5 ------- Table F.8. Question Bl.3.1: How severe were the shortages or supply chain disruptions involving durable goods and other critical equipment that you experienced? Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Membrane Mean score (0 to 3) 0.214 0.000 0.223 0.000 0.141 modules -0.032 - 0.460 0.000 - 0.000 -0.051 - 0.498 0.000 - 0.000 0.016 - 0.267 No impact (0) 78.6% 100.0% 85.1% 100.0% 88.6% 45.9% - 94.1% N/A - N/A 59.6% - 95.7% N/A - N/A 75.0% - 95.3% Slight (1) 21.4% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% 8.6% 5.9% - 54.1% N/A - N/A 1.2% - 34.2% N/A - N/A 3.0% - 22.1% Moderate (2) 0.0% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% 2.7% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.2% - 34.2% N/A - N/A 0.5% - 14.8% Severe (3) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 9 11 14 2 36 Pumps Mean score (0 to 3) 0.443 0.422 0.362 0.000 0.384 0.012 - 0.873 -0.088 - 0.933 0.007 - 0.716 0.000 - 0.000 0.146 - 0.622 No impact (0) 67.2% 83.4% 78.7% 100.0% 78.0% 35.6% - 88.3% 55.7% - 95.2% 53.3% - 92.3% N/A - N/A 63.0% - 88.1% Slight (1) 21.4% 0.0% 6.4% 0.0% 8.2% 5.9% - 54.1% N/A - N/A 1.2% - 28.4% N/A - N/A 2.9% - 21.3% Moderate (2) 11.4% 7.7% 14.9% 0.0% 11.0% 1.8% - 48.0% 1.4% - 32.3% 4.3% - 40.4% N/A - N/A 4.5% - 24.6% Severe (3) 0.0% 9.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7% N/A - N/A 1.5% - 39.4% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 0.5% - 14.8% Observations 9 11 14 2 36 F-32 Table F.8 Page 2 of 5 ------- Table F.8. Question Bl.3.1: How severe were the shortages or supply chain disruptions involving durable goods and other critical equipment that you experienced? Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Motors Mean score (0 to 3) 0.443 0.525 0.298 0.000 0.392 0.012 - 0.873 0.005 - 1.045 -0.045 - 0.641 0.000 - 0.000 0.153 - 0.631 No impact (0) 67.2% 73.1% 85.1% 100.0% 77.2% 35.6% - 88.3% 44.2% - 90.3% 59.6% - 95.7% N/A - N/A 62.0% - 87.6% Slight (1) 21.4% 10.3% 0.0% 0.0% 9.0% 5.9% - 54.1% 1.7% - 42.9% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 3.2% - 22.7% Moderate (2) 11.4% 7.7% 14.9% 0.0% 11.0% 1.8% - 48.0% 1.4% - 32.3% 4.3% - 40.4% N/A - N/A 4.5% - 24.6% Severe (3) 0.0% 9.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7% N/A - N/A 1.5% - 39.4% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 0.5% - 14.8% Observations 9 11 14 2 36 Pipes Mean score (0 to 3) 0.742 0.449 0.287 0.000 0.447 0.161 - 1.323 -0.036 - 0.933 -0.003 - 0.577 0.000 - 0.000 0.195 - 0.699 No impact (0) 57.2% 73.1% 78.7% 100.0% 72.2% 28.7% - 81.6% 44.2% - 90.3% 53.3% - 92.3% N/A - N/A 56.7% - 83.7% Slight (1) 21.4% 18.0% 13.8% 0.0% 16.5% 5.9% - 54.1% 5.2% - 46.7% 3.9% - 38.8% N/A - N/A 8.0% - 30.8% Moderate (2) 11.4% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% 5.9% 1.8% - 48.0% N/A - N/A 1.2% - 34.2% N/A - N/A 1.6% - 19.2% Severe (3) 10.0% 9.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.5% 1.7% - 40.8% 1.5% - 39.4% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.6% - 17.3% Observations 9 11 14 2 36 F-33 Table F.8 Page 3 of 5 ------- Table F.8. Question Bl.3.1: How severe were the shortages or supply chain disruptions involving durable goods and other critical equipment that you experienced? Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Chain Issue Response Percentage Reporting by Population Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Valves Mean score (0 to 3) 0.642 0.159 - 1.125 0.256 -0.034 - 0.546 0.287 -0.003 - 0.577 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.361 0.156 - 0.566 No impact (0) 57.2% 28.7% - 81.6% 82.0% 53.3% - 94.8% 78.7% 53.3% - 92.3% 100.0% N/A - N/A 74.9% 59.5% - 85.8% Slight (1) 21.4% 5.9% - 54.1% 10.3% 1.7% - 42.9% 13.8% 3.9% - 38.8% 0.0% N/A - N/A 14.1% 6.4% - 28.5% Moderate (2) 21.4% 5.9% - 54.1% 7.7% 1.4% - 32.3% 7.4% 1.2% - 34.2% 0.0% N/A - N/A 11.0% 4.5% - 24.6% Severe (3) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 9 11 14 2 36 Fuel Mean score (0 to 3) 0.672 0.157 - 1.186 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.138 -0.026 - 0.302 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.236 0.065 - 0.406 No impact (0) 55.7% 26.6% - 81.4% 100.0% N/A - N/A 86.2% 61.2% - 96.1% 100.0% N/A - N/A 82.7% 68.1% - 91.5% Slight (1) 21.4% 5.9% - 54.1% 0.0% N/A - N/A 13.8% 3.9% - 38.8% 0.0% N/A - N/A 11.0% 4.5% - 24.6% Moderate (2) 22.9% 6.3% - 56.6% 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 6.3% 1.8% - 19.3% Severe (3) Observations 9 11 14 2 36 F-34 Table F.8 Page 4 of 5 ------- Table F.8. Question Bl.3.1: How severe were the shortages or supply chain disruptions involving durable goods and other critical equipment that you experienced? Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Vehicles Mean score (0 to 3) 0.343 0.000 0.213 0.000 0.173 -0.077 - 0.763 0.000 - 0.000 0.015 - 0.410 0.000 - 0.000 0.030 - 0.315 No impact (0) 77.1% 100.0% 78.7% 100.0% 85.9% 43.4% - 93.7% N/A - N/A 53.3% - 92.3% N/A - N/A 71.5% - 93.6% Slight (1) 11.4% 0.0% 21.3% 0.0% 11.0% 1.8% - 48.0% N/A - N/A 7.7% - 46.7% N/A - N/A 4.5% - 24.6% Moderate (2) 11.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.1% 1.8% - 48.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 0.5% - 16.9% Severe (3) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 9 11 14 2 36 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-35 Table F.8 Page 5 of 5 ------- Table F.9. Question Bl.3.2: What contributed to each shortage or supply chain disruption? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Filter media Unavailable from 0.0% 100.0% 50.0% 32.5% supplier(s) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 4.0% - 96.0% 7.2% - 74.9% Delayed / backordered 36.4% 0.0% 50.0% 34.9% from supplier(s) 14.3% - 66.3% N/A - N/A 4.0% - 96.0% 11.3% - 69.4% Transportation / 63.6% 0.0% 50.0% 48.8% distribution difficulties 33.7% - 85.7% N/A - N/A 4.0% - 96.0% 16.1% - 82.6% Price 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 3 1 2 6 Granular/ Unavailable from 0.0% 50.0% 24.1% Powdered supplier(s) N/A - N/A 2.6% - 97.4% 2.0% - 83.4% Activated Delayed / backordered 100.0% 50.0% 75.9% Carbon (GAC/ from supplier(s) N/A - N/A 2.6% - 97.4% 16.6% - 98.0% PAC) Transportation / 0.0% 50.0% 24.1% distribution difficulties N/A - N/A 2.6% - 97.4% 2.0% - 83.4% Price 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 2 2 4 F-36 Table F.9 Page 1 of 5 ------- Table F.9. Question Bl.3.2: What contributed to each shortage or supply chain disruption? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Membrane Unavailable from 0.0% 50.0% 24.1% modules supplier(s) N/A - N/A 2.5% - 97.5% 1.9% - 83.9% Delayed / backordered 53.4% 50.0% 51.8% from supplier(s) 12.1% - 90.6% 2.5% - 97.5% 12.1% - 89.3% Transportation / 46.6% 0.0% 24.1% distribution difficulties 9.4% - 87.9% N/A - N/A 1.9% - 83.9% Price 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 2 2 4 Pumps Unavailable from 34.8% 53.9% 0.0% 26.8% supplier(s) 2.3% - 92.3% 7.2% - 94.6% N/A - N/A 5.3% - 70.5% Delayed / backordered 100.0% 46.1% 70.0% 76.8% from supplier(s) N/A - N/A 5.4% - 92.8% 20.5% - 95.5% 36.0% - 95.1% Transportation / 30.4% 0.0% 30.0% 23.2% distribution difficulties 5.9% - 75.0% N/A - N/A 4.5% - 79.5% 4.9% - 64.0% Price 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 3 2 3 8 F-37 Table F.9 Page 2 of 5 ------- Table F.9. Question Bl.3.2: What contributed to each shortage or supply chain disruption? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Motors Unavailable from 34.8% 33.3% 0.0% 25.9% supplier(s) 3.3% - 89.4% 5.1% - 82.3% N/A - N/A 5.2% - 68.9% Delayed / backordered 69.6% 66.7% 100.0% 75.9% from supplier(s) 20.9% - 95.2% 17.7% - 94.9% N/A - N/A 41.9% - 93.2% Transportation / 30.4% 38.2% 50.0% 37.9% distribution difficulties 4.8% - 79.1% 6.4% - 84.7% 4.1% - 95.9% 10.9% - 75.4% Price 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 3 3 2 8 Pipes Unavailable from 26.7% 61.8% 30.0% 38.0% supplier(s) 3.0% - 81.2% 13.3% - 94.5% 4.4% - 80.0% 15.3% - 67.6% Delayed / backordered 76.7% 38.2% 100.0% 71.9% from supplier(s) 25.9% - 96.9% 5.5% - 86.7% N/A - N/A 38.8% - 91.1% Transportation / 23.3% 0.0% 65.0% 28.1% distribution difficulties 3.1% - 74.1% N/A - N/A 12.6% - 96.0% 8.9% - 61.2% Price 23.3% 0.0% 0.0% 9.9% 3.1% - 74.1% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.3% - 47.9% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 4 3 3 10 F-38 Table F.9 Page 3 of 5 ------- Table F.9. Question Bl.3.2: What contributed to each shortage or supply chain disruption? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Valves Unavailable from 26.7% 0.0% 30.0% 21.9% supplier(s) 3.0% - 81.0% N/A - N/A 4.5% - 79.5% 4.6% - 61.8% Delayed / backordered 53.4% 100.0% 70.0% 68.8% from supplier(s) 20.8% - 83.3% N/A - N/A 20.5% - 95.5% 35.1% - 90.0% Transportation / 46.6% 57.3% 35.0% 45.3% distribution difficulties 16.7% - 79.2% 8.2% - 95.3% 3.7% - 88.2% 18.5% - 75.1% Price 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 4 2 3 9 Fuel Unavailable from 25.8% 0.0% 18.2% supplier(s) 2.0% - 85.4% N/A - N/A 1.8% - 73.0% Delayed / backordered 51.7% 0.0% 36.4% from supplier(s) 9.5% - 91.6% N/A - N/A 10.3% - 74.1% Transportation / 48.3% 46.1% 47.7% distribution difficulties 8.4% - 90.5% 9.7% - 87.1% 11.1% - 87.0% Price 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 4 2 6 F-39 Table F.9 Page 4 of 5 ------- Table F.9. Question Bl.3.2: What contributed to each shortage or supply chain disruption? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Vehicles Unavailable from 50.0% 0.0% 22.3% supplier(s) 1.9% - 98.1% N/A - N/A 2.2% - 78.5% Delayed / backordered 50.0% 0.0% 22.3% from supplier(s) 1.9% - 98.1% N/A - N/A 2.2% - 78.5% Transportation / 0.0% 30.0% 16.6% distribution difficulties N/A - N/A 30.0% - 30.0% 16.6% - 16.6% Price 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other 50.0% 1.9% - 98.1% 0.0% N/A - N/A 22.3% 2.2% - 78.5% Observations 2 3 5 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-40 Table F.9 Page 5 of 5 ------- Table F.10. Question Bl.3.3: How did you address each shortage or supply chain disruption? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Filter media Found alternative supplier 31.8% 0.0% 0.0% 16.3% 4.0% - 84.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.7% - 68.2% Drew down existing inventory 68.2% 0.0% 50.0% 51.2% 16.0% - 96.0% N/A - N/A 4.0% - 96.0% 17.4% - 83.9% Switched chemicals, 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% procedures, or technologies N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Sought help from other utilities 68.2% 0.0% 0.0% 34.9% or mutual aid network (e.g., WARN) 16.0% - 96.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 11.3% - 69.4% Coordinated with local or state 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 16.3% emergency management agency N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 4.0% - 96.0% 1.7% - 68.2% Other 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 16.3% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.7% - 68.2% Observations 3 1 2 6 Granular/ Found alternative supplier 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Powdered N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Activated Drew down existing inventory 100.0% 50.0% 75.9% Carbon (GAC/ N/A - N/A 2.6% - 97.4% 16.6% - 98.0% PAC) Switched chemicals, 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% procedures, or technologies N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Sought help from other utilities 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% or mutual aid network (e.g., WARN) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Coordinated with local or state 0.0% 50.0% 24.1% emergency management agency N/A - N/A 2.6% - 97.4% 2.0% - 83.4% Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 2 2 4 F-41 Table F.10 Page 1 of 5 ------- Table F.10. Question Bl.3.3: How did you address each shortage or supply chain disruption? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Membrane Found alternative supplier 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% modules N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Drew down existing inventory 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A Switched chemicals, 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% procedures, or technologies N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Sought help from other utilities 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% or mutual aid network (e.g., WARN) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Coordinated with local or state 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% emergency management agency N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 2 2 4 Pumps Found alternative supplier 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Drew down existing inventory 100.0% 0.0% 35.0% 53.6% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 3.7% - 88.2% 27.4% - 78.0% Switched chemicals, 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% procedures, or technologies N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Sought help from other utilities 0.0% 0.0% 35.0% 12.5% or mutual aid network (e.g., WARN) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 3.7% - 88.2% 1.5% - 56.4% Coordinated with local or state 0.0% 46.1% 35.0% 23.2% emergency management agency N/A - N/A 5.4% - 92.8% 3.7% - 88.2% 4.9% - 64.0% Other 0.0% 53.9% 30.0% 23.2% N/A - N/A 7.2% - 94.6% 4.5% - 79.5% 4.9% - 64.0% Observations 3 2 3 8 F-42 Table F.10 Page 2 of 5 ------- Table F.10. Question Bl.3.3: How did you address each shortage or supply chain disruption? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Motors Found alternative supplier 34.8% 0.0% 0.0% 13.8% 3.3% - 89.4% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.7% - 60.1% Drew down existing inventory 65.2% 38.2% 0.0% 39.7% 10.6% - 96.7% 6.4% - 84.7% N/A - N/A 13.0% - 74.3% Switched chemicals, 34.8% 0.0% 0.0% 13.8% procedures, or technologies 3.3% - 89.4% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.7% - 60.1% Sought help from other utilities 34.8% 0.0% 50.0% 25.9% or mutual aid network (e.g., WARN) 3.3% - 89.4% N/A - N/A 4.1% - 95.9% 5.2% - 68.9% Coordinated with local or state 0.0% 28.5% 50.0% 22.4% emergency management agency N/A - N/A 9.2% - 61.1% 4.1% - 95.9% 7.0% - 52.5% Other 0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 12.1% N/A - N/A 5.1% - 82.3% N/A - N/A 1.5% - 55.3% Observations 3 3 2 8 Pipes Found alternative supplier 26.7% 0.0% 0.0% 11.3% 3.0% - 81.2% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.4% - 52.8% Drew down existing inventory 50.0% 38.2% 70.0% 52.1% 9.3% - 90.7% 5.5% - 86.7% 20.0% - 95.6% 23.4% - 79.6% Switched chemicals, 26.7% 0.0% 0.0% 11.3% procedures, or technologies 3.0% - 81.2% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.4% - 52.8% Sought help from other utilities 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 21.1% or mutual aid network (e.g., WARN) 9.3% - 90.7% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 4.5% - 60.2% Coordinated with local or state 0.0% 28.5% 0.0% 8.4% emergency management agency N/A - N/A 3.7% - 80.6% N/A - N/A 1.1% - 42.4% Other 0.0% 33.3% 30.0% 18.3% N/A - N/A 4.5% - 84.1% 4.4% - 80.0% 4.1% - 54.1% Observations 4 3 3 10 F-43 Table F.10 Page 3 of 5 ------- Table F.10. Question Bl.3.3: How did you address each shortage or supply chain disruption? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Valves Found alternative supplier 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 23.5% 9.0% - 91.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 4.9% - 64.6% Drew down existing inventory 76.7% 57.3% 35.0% 59.5% 24.9% - 97.0% 8.2% - 95.3% 3.7% - 88.2% 34.8% - 80.1% Switched chemicals, 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% procedures, or technologies N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Sought help from other utilities 26.7% 0.0% 35.0% 23.5% or mutual aid network (e.g., WARN) 3.0% - 81.0% N/A - N/A 3.7% - 88.2% 4.9% - 64.6% Coordinated with local or state 0.0% 42.7% 0.0% 9.3% emergency management agency N/A - N/A 4.7% - 91.8% N/A - N/A 1.2% - 45.7% Other 0.0% 0.0% 30.0% 9.3% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 4.5% - 79.5% 1.2% - 45.7% Observations 4 2 3 9 Fuel Found alternative supplier 25.8% 2.0% - 85.4% 46.1% 9.7% - 87.1% 31.8% 7.7% - 72.1% Drew down existing inventory 100.0% N/A - N/A 53.9% 12.9% - 90.3% 86.4% 86.4% - 86.4% Switched chemicals, 25.8% 0.0% 18.2% procedures, or technologies 2.0% - 85.4% N/A - N/A 1.8% - 73.0% Sought help from other utilities 25.8% 0.0% 18.2% or mutual aid network (e.g., WARN) 2.0% - 85.4% N/A - N/A 1.8% - 73.0% Coordinated with local or state 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% emergency management agency N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 4 2 6 F-44 Table F.10 Page 4 of 5 ------- Table F.10. Question Bl.3.3: How did you address each shortage or supply chain disruption? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Chain Issue Response Percentage Reporting by Population Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Vehicles Found alternative supplier 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Drew down existing inventory 0.0% N/A - N/A 70.0% 70.0% - 70.0% 38.8% 38.8% - 38.8% Switched chemicals, procedures, or technologies 50.0% 1.9% - 98.1% 0.0% N/A - N/A 22.3% 2.2% - 78.5% Sought help from other utilities or mutual aid network (e.g., WARN) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Coordinated with local or state emergency management agency 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other 50.0% 1.9% - 98.1% 30.0% 30.0% - 30.0% 38.9% 9.1% - 80.3% Observations 2 3 5 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-45 Table F.10 Page 5 of 5 ------- Table F.ll. Question B2.1: What kinds of shortages or supply chain disruptions are you most concerned about from present day through December 2020? Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Treatment Chemicals 44.3% 29.5% 38.3% 0.0% 35.3% 18.6% - 73.4% 11.3% - 58.1% 19.4% - 61.6% N/A - N/A 23.0% - 50.0% PPE 57.2% 55.1% 42.6% 46.1% 50.6% 28.7% - 81.6% 28.9% - 78.8% 22.3% - 65.6% 7.1% - 90.6% 36.9% - 64.2% Durable Goods and Other 77.1% 55.1% 43.6% 0.0% 54.1% Equipment and Supplies 43.4% - 93.7% 28.9% - 78.8% 22.6% - 67.2% N/A - N/A 39.6% - 68.0% None 22.9% 25.6% 42.5% 53.9% 32.5% 6.3% - 56.6% 9.4% - 53.3% 21.8% - 66.2% 9.4% - 92.9% 20.4% - 47.5% Observations 9 11 14 2 36 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-46 Table F.11 Page 1 of 1 ------- Table F.12. Question B2.1.1: How severe are your concerns about treatment chemical shortages or supply chain disruptions? Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Carbon Mean score (0 to 3) 0.100 0.000 0.223 0.000 0.110 dioxide -0.064 - 0.264 0.000 - 0.000 -0.163 - 0.609 0.000 - 0.000 -0.041 - 0.260 None (0) 90.0% 100.0% 92.6% 100.0% 94.5% 59.2% - 98.3% N/A - N/A 65.8% - 98.8% N/A - N/A 82.7% - 98.4% Slight (1) 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7% 1.7% - 40.8% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 0.5% - 14.8% Moderate (2) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Severe(3) 0.0% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% 2.7% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.2% - 34.2% N/A - N/A 0.5% - 14.8% Observations 9 11 14 2 36 Ferric Mean score (0 to 3) 0.100 0.000 0.223 0.000 0.110 chloride -0.064 - 0.264 0.000 - 0.000 -0.163 - 0.609 0.000 - 0.000 -0.041 - 0.260 None (0) 90.0% 100.0% 92.6% 100.0% 94.5% 59.2% - 98.3% N/A - N/A 65.8% - 98.8% N/A - N/A 82.7% - 98.4% Slight (1) 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7% 1.7% - 40.8% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 0.5% - 14.8% Moderate (2) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Severe(3) 0.0% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% 2.7% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.2% - 34.2% N/A - N/A 0.5% - 14.8% Observations 9 11 14 2 36 F-47 Table F.12 Page 1 of 6 ------- Table F.12. Question B2.1.1: How severe are your concerns about treatment chemical shortages or supply chain disruptions? Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Fluoride Mean score (0 to 3) 0.100 0.000 0.074 0.000 0.055 -0.064 - 0.264 0.000 - 0.000 -0.054 - 0.203 0.000 - 0.000 -0.011 - 0.121 None (0) 90.0% 100.0% 92.6% 100.0% 94.5% 59.2% - 98.3% N/A - N/A 65.8% - 98.8% N/A - N/A 82.7% - 98.4% Slight (1) 10.0% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% 5.5% 1.7% - 40.8% N/A - N/A 1.2% - 34.2% N/A - N/A 1.6% - 17.3% Moderate (2) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Severe(3) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 9 11 14 2 36 Gaseous Mean score (0 to 3) 0.314 0.000 0.149 0.000 0.141 chlorine -0.054 - 0.682 0.000 - 0.000 -0.023 - 0.321 0.000 - 0.000 0.016 - 0.267 None (0) 78.6% 100.0% 85.1% 100.0% 88.6% 45.9% - 94.1% N/A - N/A 59.6% - 95.7% N/A - N/A 75.0% - 95.3% Slight (1) 11.4% 0.0% 14.9% 0.0% 8.6% 1.8% - 48.0% N/A - N/A 4.3% - 40.4% N/A - N/A 3.0% - 22.1% Moderate (2) 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7% 1.7% - 40.8% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 0.5% - 14.8% Severe(3) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 9 11 14 2 36 F-48 Table F.12 Page 2 of 6 ------- Table F.12. Question B2.1.1: How severe are your concerns about treatment chemical shortages or supply chain disruptions? Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Liquid Mean score (0 to 3) 0.100 0.000 0.074 0.000 0.055 oxygen -0.064 - 0.264 0.000 - 0.000 -0.054 - 0.203 0.000 - 0.000 -0.011 - 0.121 None (0) 90.0% 100.0% 92.6% 100.0% 94.5% 59.2% - 98.3% N/A - N/A 65.8% - 98.8% N/A - N/A 82.7% - 98.4% Slight (1) 10.0% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% 5.5% 1.7% - 40.8% N/A - N/A 1.2% - 34.2% N/A - N/A 1.6% - 17.3% Moderate (2) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Severe(3) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 9 11 14 2 36 Lime Mean score (0 to 3) 0.214 0.000 0.223 0.000 0.141 -0.032 - 0.460 0.000 - 0.000 -0.163 - 0.609 0.000 - 0.000 -0.019 - 0.302 None (0) 78.6% 100.0% 92.6% 100.0% 91.4% 45.9% - 94.1% N/A - N/A 65.8% - 98.8% N/A - N/A 77.9% - 97.0% Slight (1) 21.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.9% 5.9% - 54.1% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.6% - 19.2% Moderate (2) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Severe(3) 0.0% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% 2.7% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.2% - 34.2% N/A - N/A 0.5% - 14.8% Observations 9 11 14 2 36 F-49 Table F.12 Page 3 of 6 ------- Table F.12. Question B2.1.1: How severe are your concerns about treatment chemical shortages or supply chain disruptions? Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Orthophosphate Mean score (0 to 3) 0.100 0.000 0.074 0.000 0.055 -0.064 - 0.264 0.000 - 0.000 -0.054 - 0.203 0.000 - 0.000 -0.011 - 0.121 None (0) 90.0% 100.0% 92.6% 100.0% 94.5% 59.2% - 98.3% N/A - N/A 65.8% - 98.8% N/A - N/A 82.7% - 98.4% Slight (1) 10.0% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% 5.5% 1.7% - 40.8% N/A - N/A 1.2% - 34.2% N/A - N/A 1.6% - 17.3% Moderate (2) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Severe(3) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 9 11 14 2 36 Polymers Mean score (0 to 3) 0.443 0.103 0.607 0.000 0.377 0.012 - 0.873 -0.071 - 0.276 0.181 - 1.033 0.000 - 0.000 0.161 - 0.593 None (0) 67.2% 89.7% 61.7% 100.0% 73.7% 35.6% - 88.3% 57.1% - 98.3% 38.4% - 80.6% N/A - N/A 58.6% - 84.7% Slight (1) 21.4% 10.3% 23.4% 0.0% 17.7% 5.9% - 54.1% 1.7% - 42.9% 8.9% - 49.1% N/A - N/A 8.8% - 32.4% Moderate (2) 11.4% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% 5.9% 1.8% - 48.0% N/A - N/A 1.2% - 34.2% N/A - N/A 1.6% - 19.2% Severe(3) 0.0% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% 2.7% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.2% - 34.2% N/A - N/A 0.5% - 14.8% Observations 9 11 14 2 36 F-50 Table F.12 Page 4 of 6 ------- Table F.12. Question B2.1.1: How severe are your concerns about treatment chemical shortages or supply chain disruptions? Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Potassium Mean score (0 to 3) 0.214 0.000 0.149 0.000 0.114 permanganate -0.032 - 0.460 0.000 - 0.000 -0.108 - 0.406 0.000 - 0.000 -0.006 - 0.233 None (0) 78.6% 100.0% 92.6% 100.0% 91.4% 45.9% - 94.1% N/A - N/A 65.8% - 98.8% N/A - N/A 77.9% - 97.0% Slight (1) 21.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.9% 5.9% - 54.1% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.6% - 19.2% Moderate (2) 0.0% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% 2.7% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.2% - 34.2% N/A - N/A 0.5% - 14.8% Severe(3) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 9 11 14 2 36 Sodium Mean score (0 to 3) 0.214 0.000 0.149 0.000 0.114 hydroxide -0.032 - 0.460 0.000 - 0.000 -0.108 - 0.406 0.000 - 0.000 -0.006 - 0.233 None (0) 78.6% 100.0% 92.6% 100.0% 91.4% 45.9% - 94.1% N/A - N/A 65.8% - 98.8% N/A - N/A 77.9% - 97.0% Slight (1) 21.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.9% 5.9% - 54.1% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.6% - 19.2% Moderate (2) 0.0% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% 2.7% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.2% - 34.2% N/A - N/A 0.5% - 14.8% Severe(3) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 9 11 14 2 36 F-51 Table F.12 Page 5 of 6 ------- Table F.12. Question B2.1.1: How severe are your concerns about treatment chemical shortages or supply chain disruptions? Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Sodium Mean score (0 to 3) 0.100 0.385 0.458 0.000 0.314 hypochlorite -0.064 - 0.264 -0.059 - 0.829 0.016 - 0.900 0.000 - 0.000 0.091 - 0.537 None (0) 90.0% 80.7% 76.6% 100.0% 82.7% 59.2% - 98.3% 50.1% - 94.6% 50.9% - 91.1% N/A - N/A 68.2% - 91.5% Slight (1) 10.0% 0.0% 8.5% 0.0% 5.9% 1.7% - 40.8% N/A - N/A 1.5% - 36.3% N/A - N/A 1.6% - 19.2% Moderate (2) 0.0% 19.3% 7.4% 0.0% 8.6% N/A - N/A 5.4% - 49.9% 1.2% - 34.2% N/A - N/A 3.0% - 22.1% Severe(3) 0.0% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% 2.7% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.2% - 34.2% N/A - N/A 0.5% - 14.8% Observations 9 11 14 2 36 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-52 Table F.12 Page 6 of 6 ------- Table F.13. Question B2.1.2: For each item, what are you most concerned about? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Chain Issue Response Percentage Reporting by Population Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Carbon dioxide Unavailable from supplier(s) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Delayed / backordered from supplier(s) 100.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 50.0% 1.7% - 98.3% Transportation / distribution difficulties 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A Price 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 1 1 2 Ferric chloride Unavailable from supplier(s) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Delayed / backordered from supplier(s) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Transportation / distribution difficulties 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A Price 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 1 1 2 F-53 Table F.13 Page 1 of 6 ------- Table F.13. Question B2.1.2: For each item, what are you most concerned about? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Chain Issue Response Percentage Reporting by Population Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Fluoride Unavailable from supplier(s) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Delayed / backordered from supplier(s) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Transportation / distribution difficulties 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A Price 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 1 1 2 Gaseous chlorine Unavailable from supplier(s) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Delayed / backordered from supplier(s) 53.4% 13.9% - 89.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A 27.7% 27.7% - 27.7% Transportation / distribution difficulties 46.6% 11.0% - 86.1% 100.0% N/A - N/A 72.3% 72.3% - 72.3% Price 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 2 2 4 F-54 Table F.13 Page 2 of 6 ------- Table F.13. Question B2.1.2: For each item, what are you most concerned about? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Chain Issue Response Percentage Reporting by Population Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Liquid oxygen Unavailable from supplier(s) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Delayed / backordered from supplier(s) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Transportation / distribution difficulties 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A Price 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 1 1 2 Lime Unavailable from supplier(s) 53.4% 13.3% - 89.5% 0.0% N/A - N/A 36.4% 36.4% - 36.4% Delayed / backordered from supplier(s) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Transportation / distribution difficulties 46.6% 10.5% - 86.7% 0.0% N/A - N/A 31.8% 2.4% - 89.9% Price 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A Observations 2 1 3 F-55 Table F.13 Page 3 of 6 ------- Table F.13. Question B2.1.2: For each item, what are you most concerned about? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Orthophosphate Unavailable from 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% supplier(s) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Delayed / backordered 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% from supplier(s) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Transportation / 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% distribution difficulties N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Price 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 1 1 2 Polymers Unavailable from 34.8% 0.0% 0.0% 12.0% supplier(s) 3.8% - 87.9% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.5% - 54.5% Delayed / backordered 69.6% 100.0% 61.1% 68.7% from supplier(s) 19.9% - 95.5% N/A - N/A 19.0% - 91.3% 41.1% - 87.3% Transportation / 65.2% 0.0% 58.3% 53.7% distribution difficulties 12.1% - 96.2% N/A - N/A 18.4% - 89.7% 25.4% - 79.8% Price 34.8% 0.0% 0.0% 12.0% 3.8% - 87.9% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.5% - 54.5% Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 3 1 5 9 F-56 Table F.13 Page 4 of 6 ------- Table F.13. Question B2.1.2: For each item, what are you most concerned about? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Chain Issue Response Percentage Reporting by Population Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Potassium permanganate Unavailable from supplier(s) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Delayed / backordered from supplier(s) 53.4% 13.2% - 89.7% 0.0% N/A - N/A 36.4% 36.4% - 36.4% Transportation / distribution difficulties 46.6% 10.3% - 86.8% 100.0% N/A - N/A 63.6% 63.6% - 63.6% Price 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 2 1 3 Sodium hydroxide Unavailable from supplier(s) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Delayed / backordered from supplier(s) 53.4% 13.5% - 89.4% 0.0% N/A - N/A 36.4% 36.4% - 36.4% Transportation / distribution difficulties 46.6% 10.6% - 86.5% 100.0% N/A - N/A 63.6% 63.6% - 63.6% Price 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 2 1 3 F-57 Table F.13 Page 5 of 6 ------- Table F.13. Question B2.1.2: For each item, what are you most concerned about? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Sodium Unavailable from 0.0% 53.4% 0.0% 18.2% hypochlorite supplier(s) N/A - N/A 6.9% - 94.7% N/A - N/A 2.0% - 70.6% Delayed / backordered 0.0% 100.0% 68.2% 68.2% from supplier(s) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 13.7% - 96.7% 29.5% - 91.7% Transportation / 100.0% 53.4% 63.6% 65.9% distribution difficulties N/A - N/A 6.9% - 94.7% 15.6% - 94.3% 19.3% - 94.0% Price 0.0% 53.4% 0.0% 18.2% N/A - N/A 6.9% - 94.7% N/A - N/A 2.0% - 70.6% Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 1 2 3 6 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-58 Table F.13 Page 6 of 6 ------- Table F.14. Question B2.1.3: What steps have you taken or are you taking to prepare for potential shortages and supply chain disruptions? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Carbon dioxide Seek alternative supplier 0.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 50.0% 1.7% - 98.3% Increase purchasing / maintain a larger than typical inventory 100.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 50.0% 1.7% - 98.3% Switch chemicals, procedures, or technologies 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Make arrangements with neighboring utilities or mutual aid network 0.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 50.0% 1.7% - 98.3% Other Observations 1 1 2 Ferric chloride Seek alternative supplier 0.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 50.0% 1.8% - 98.2% Increase purchasing / maintain a larger than typical inventory 100.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 50.0% 1.8% - 98.2% Switch chemicals, procedures, or technologies 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Make arrangements with neighboring utilities or mutual aid network 0.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 50.0% 1.8% - 98.2% Other Observations 1 1 2 F-59 Table F.14 Page 1 of 6 ------- Table F.14. Question B2.1.3: What steps have you taken or are you taking to prepare for potential shortages and supply chain disruptions? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Chain Issue Response Percentage Reporting by Population Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Fluoride Seek alternative supplier 0.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 50.0% 1.8% - 98.2% Increase purchasing / maintain a larger than typical inventory 100.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 50.0% 1.8% - 98.2% Switch chemicals, procedures, or technologies 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Make arrangements with neighboring utilities or mutual aid network 0.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 50.0% 1.8% - 98.2% Other Observations 1 1 2 Gaseous chlorine Seek alternative supplier 0.0% N/A - N/A 50.0% 3.3% - 96.7% 24.1% 2.4% - 80.8% Increase purchasing / maintain a larger than typical inventory 46.6% 11.0% - 86.1% 50.0% 3.3% - 96.7% 48.2% 12.3% - 86.1% Switch chemicals, procedures, or technologies 53.4% 13.9% - 89.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A 27.7% 27.7% - 27.7% Make arrangements with neighboring utilities or mutual aid network 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other Observations 2 2 4 F-60 Table F.14 Page 2 of 6 ------- Table F.14. Question B2.1.3: What steps have you taken or are you taking to prepare for potential shortages and supply chain disruptions? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Liquid oxygen Seek alternative supplier 0.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 50.0% 1.1% - 98.9% Increase purchasing / maintain a larger than typical inventory 100.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 50.0% 1.1% - 98.9% Switch chemicals, procedures, or technologies 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Make arrangements with neighboring utilities or mutual aid network 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other Observations 1 1 2 Lime Seek alternative supplier 53.4% 13.3% - 89.5% 0.0% N/A - N/A 36.4% 36.4% - 36.4% Increase purchasing / maintain a larger than typical inventory 46.6% 10.5% - 86.7% 0.0% N/A - N/A 31.8% 2.4% - 89.9% Switch chemicals, procedures, or technologies 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Make arrangements with neighboring utilities or mutual aid network 0.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 31.8% 2.4% - 89.9% Other Observations 2 1 3 F-61 Table F.14 Page 3 of 6 ------- Table F.14. Question B2.1.3: What steps have you taken or are you taking to prepare for potential shortages and supply chain disruptions? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Orthophos- phate Seek alternative supplier 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Increase purchasing / maintain a larger than typical inventory 100.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 50.0% 1.8% - 98.2% Switch chemicals, procedures, or technologies 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Make arrangements with neighboring utilities or mutual aid network 0.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 50.0% 1.8% - 98.2% Other Observations 1 1 2 Polymers Seek alternative supplier 34.8% 3.8% - 87.9% 0.0% N/A - N/A 22.3% 3.8% - 67.4% 23.9% 6.8% - 57.4% Increase purchasing / maintain a larger than typical inventory 65.2% 12.1% - 96.2% 100.0% N/A - N/A 80.6% 27.8% - 97.8% 77.6% 37.5% - 95.2% Switch chemicals, procedures, or technologies 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Make arrangements with neighboring utilities or mutual aid network 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 19.4% 2.2% - 72.2% 10.4% 1.3% - 50.0% Other Observations 3 1 5 9 F-62 Table F.14 Page 4 of 6 ------- Table F.14. Question B2.1.3: What steps have you taken or are you taking to prepare for potential shortages and supply chain disruptions? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Chain Issue Response Percentage Reporting by Population Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Potassium perman- ganate Seek alternative supplier 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Increase purchasing / maintain a larger than typical inventory 100.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 68.2% 10.0% - 97.7% Switch chemicals, procedures, or technologies 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Make arrangements with neighboring utilities or mutual aid network 0.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 31.8% 2.3% - 90.0% Other Observations 2 1 3 Sodium hydroxide Seek alternative supplier 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Increase purchasing / maintain a larger than typical inventory 100.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 68.2% 10.3% - 97.6% Switch chemicals, procedures, or technologies 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Make arrangements with neighboring utilities or mutual aid network 0.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 31.8% 2.4% - 89.7% Other Observations 2 1 3 F-63 Table F.14 Page 5 of 6 ------- Table F.14. Question B2.1.3: What steps have you taken or are you taking to prepare for potential shortages and supply chain disruptions? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Sodium Seek alternative supplier 0.0% 0.0% 36.4% 18.2% hypochlo- N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 5.7% - 84.4% 2.0% - 70.6% rite Increase purchasing / maintain a 100.0% 100.0% 68.2% 84.1% larger than typical inventory N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 13.7% - 96.7% 34.7% - 98.1% Switch chemicals, procedures, or 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% technologies N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Make arrangements with neighboring 0.0% 0.0% 31.8% 15.9% utilities or mutual aid network N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 3.3% - 86.3% 1.9% - 65.3% Other Observations 1 2 3 6 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-64 Table F.14 Page 6 of 6 ------- Table F.15. Question B2.2.1: How severe are your concerns about personal protective equipment shortages or supply chain disruptions? Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All N95 masks Mean score (0 to 3) 0.686 0.462 0.628 0.461 0.585 and/or 0.185 - 1.187 0.104 - 0.819 0.228 - 1.027 -0.141 - 1.063 0.361 - 0.808 elastomeric None (0) 54.3% 62.8% 57.4% 53.9% 58.0% respirators 26.0% - 80.0% 35.7% - 83.7% 34.4% - 77.7% 9.4% - 92.9% 44.3% - 70.6% Slight (1) 22.9% 28.2% 28.7% 46.1% 27.9% 6.3% - 56.6% 11.0% - 55.6% 12.5% - 53.3% 7.1% - 90.6% 17.3% - 41.6% Moderate (2) 22.9% 9.0% 7.4% 0.0% 11.8% 6.3% - 56.6% 1.5% - 39.4% 1.2% - 34.2% N/A - N/A 4.8% - 25.9% Severe(3) 0.0% 0.0% 6.4% 0.0% 2.3% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.2% - 28.4% N/A - N/A 0.4% - 11.6% Observations 9 11 14 2 36 Alternative Mean score (0 to 3) 0.457 0.282 0.628 0.461 0.467 mask 0.031 - 0.884 0.048 - 0.517 0.228 - 1.027 -0.141 - 1.063 0.270 - 0.663 options None (0) 65.7% 71.8% 57.4% 53.9% 63.9% (surgical, 34.4% - 87.5% 44.4% - 89.0% 34.4% - 77.7% 9.4% - 92.9% 50.2% - 75.7% cloth, etc.) Slight (1) 22.9% 28.2% 28.7% 46.1% 27.9% 6.3% - 56.6% 11.0% - 55.6% 12.5% - 53.3% 7.1% - 90.6% 17.3% - 41.6% Moderate (2) 11.4% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% 5.9% 1.8% - 48.0% N/A - N/A 1.2% - 34.2% N/A - N/A 1.6% - 19.2% Severe(3) 0.0% 0.0% 6.4% 0.0% 2.3% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.2% - 28.4% N/A - N/A 0.4% - 11.6% Observations 9 11 14 2 36 F-65 Table F.15 Page 1 of 3 ------- Table F.15. Question B2.2.1: How severe are your concerns about personal protective equipment shortages or supply chain disruptions? Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Face shield Mean score (0 to 3) 0.686 0.462 0.500 0.461 0.538 and/or 0.185 - 1.187 0.104 - 0.819 0.087 - 0.913 -0.141 - 1.063 0.310 - 0.765 protective None (0) 54.3% 62.8% 70.2% 53.9% 62.7% eye wear 26.0% - 80.0% 35.7% - 83.7% 44.8% - 87.2% 9.4% - 92.9% 48.6% - 74.9% Slight (1) 22.9% 28.2% 16.0% 46.1% 23.2% 6.3% - 56.6% 11.0% - 55.6% 4.7% - 42.4% 7.1% - 90.6% 13.3% - 37.1% Moderate (2) 22.9% 9.0% 7.4% 0.0% 11.8% 6.3% - 56.6% 1.5% - 39.4% 1.2% - 34.2% N/A - N/A 4.8% - 25.9% Severe(3) 0.0% 0.0% 6.4% 0.0% 2.3% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.2% - 28.4% N/A - N/A 0.4% - 11.6% Observations 9 11 14 2 36 Nitrile Mean score (0 to 3) 0.801 0.847 0.564 0.922 0.734 and/or latex 0.240 - 1.361 0.257 - 1.437 0.224 - 0.904 -0.282 - 2.126 0.467 - 1.000 gloves None (0) 54.3% 53.8% 57.4% 53.9% 55.3% 26.0% - 80.0% 28.0% - 77.7% 34.4% - 77.7% 9.4% - 92.9% 41.2% - 68.5% Slight (1) 11.4% 18.0% 28.7% 0.0% 19.2% 1.8% - 48.0% 5.2% - 46.7% 12.5% - 53.3% N/A - N/A 10.2% - 33.2% Moderate (2) 34.3% 17.9% 13.8% 46.1% 22.4% 12.5% - 65.6% 5.2% - 46.6% 3.9% - 38.8% 7.1% - 90.6% 12.1% - 37.5% Severe(3) 0.0% 10.3% 0.0% 0.0% 3.1% N/A - N/A 1.7% - 42.9% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 0.5% - 16.9% Observations 9 11 14 2 36 F-66 Table F.15 Page 2 of 3 ------- Table F.15. Question B2.2.1: How severe are your concerns about personal protective equipment shortages or supply chain disruptions? Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Tyvek suite Mean score (0 to 3) 0.572 0.359 0.447 0.461 0.455 and/or 0.151 - 0.992 0.008 - 0.710 0.040 - 0.855 -0.141 - 1.063 0.235 - 0.675 disposable None (0) 54.3% 73.1% 70.2% 53.9% 65.9% coveralls 26.0% - 80.0% 44.2% - 90.3% 44.8% - 87.2% 9.4% - 92.9% 51.2% - 78.0% Slight (1) 34.3% 18.0% 22.4% 46.1% 25.5% 12.5% - 65.6% 5.2% - 46.7% 8.2% - 48.0% 7.1% - 90.6% 15.3% - 39.5% Moderate (2) 11.4% 9.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.9% 1.8% - 48.0% 1.5% - 39.4% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.6% - 19.2% Severe(3) 0.0% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% 2.7% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.2% - 34.2% N/A - N/A 0.5% - 14.8% Observations 9 11 14 2 36 Sanitizing Mean score (0 to 3) 0.915 0.628 0.766 0.922 0.773 wipes, 0.310 - 1.520 0.098 - 1.158 0.271 - 1.261 -0.282 - 2.126 0.470 - 1.075 sprays for None (0) 54.3% 64.1% 57.4% 53.9% 58.4% cleaning 26.0% - 80.0% 36.1% - 84.9% 34.4% - 77.7% 9.4% - 92.9% 43.9% - 71.6% work Slight (1) 0.0% 18.0% 22.4% 0.0% 13.7% offices, or N/A - N/A 5.2% - 46.7% 8.2% - 48.0% N/A - N/A 6.3% - 27.5% gels for Moderate (2) 45.7% 9.0% 6.4% 46.1% 20.0% hand 20.0% - 74.0% 1.5% - 39.4% 1.2% - 28.4% 7.1% - 90.6% 10.8% - 34.2% sanitizing Severe(3) 0.0% 9.0% 13.8% 0.0% 7.8% N/A - N/A 1.5% - 39.4% 3.9% - 38.8% N/A - N/A 2.8% - 19.8% Observations 9 11 14 2 36 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-67 Table F.15 Page 3 of 3 ------- Table F.16. Question B2.2.2: For each item, what are you most concerned about? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All N95 masks Unavailable from 25.0% 100.0% 15.0% 0.0% 40.2% and/or supplier(s) 3.2% - 77.0% N/A - N/A 2.2% - 57.9% N/A - N/A 18.4% - 66.8% elastomeric Delayed / backordered 100.0% 0.0% 50.0% 100.0% 54.2% respirators from supplier(s) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 19.5% - 80.5% N/A - N/A 29.1% - 77.4% Transportation / 25.0% 0.0% 17.5% 0.0% 14.0% distribution difficulties 3.2% - 77.0% N/A - N/A 2.2% - 66.8% N/A - N/A 3.3% - 43.6% Price 25.0% 0.0% 32.5% 0.0% 19.6% 3.2% - 77.0% N/A - N/A 7.1% - 75.2% N/A - N/A 6.0% - 48.4% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 4 4 6 1 15 Alternative Unavailable from 33.3% 63.6% 15.0% 0.0% 30.4% mask supplier(s) 3.9% - 86.0% 13.1% - 95.3% 2.3% - 57.0% N/A - N/A 11.8% - 58.8% options Delayed / backordered 100.0% 36.4% 35.0% 100.0% 56.6% (surgical, from supplier(s) N/A - N/A 4.7% - 86.9% 20.0% - 53.7% N/A - N/A 33.2% - 77.3% cloth, etc.) Transportation / 0.0% 0.0% 32.5% 0.0% 14.1% distribution difficulties N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 6.2% - 77.8% N/A - N/A 3.4% - 43.6% Price 0.0% 0.0% 17.5% 0.0% 7.6% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.8% - 70.7% N/A - N/A 1.0% - 40.3% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 3 3 6 1 13 F-68 Table F.16 Page 1 of 3 ------- Table F.16. Question B2.2.2: For each item, what are you most concerned about? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Face shield Unavailable from 50.0% 48.3% 0.0% 0.0% 31.6% and/or supplier(s) 11.9% - 88.1% 11.5% - 87.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 12.7% - 59.5% protective Delayed / backordered 75.0% 51.7% 50.0% 100.0% 62.1% eye wear from supplier(s) 22.9% - 96.8% 13.0% - 88.5% 16.2% - 83.8% N/A - N/A 36.2% - 82.6% Transportation / 25.0% 0.0% 25.0% 0.0% 15.8% distribution difficulties 3.2% - 77.1% N/A - N/A 2.7% - 80.0% N/A - N/A 3.7% - 47.9% Price 25.0% 0.0% 25.0% 0.0% 15.8% 3.2% - 77.1% N/A - N/A 2.7% - 80.0% N/A - N/A 3.7% - 47.9% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 4 4 4 1 13 Nitrile Unavailable from 50.0% 58.3% 29.9% 0.0% 43.0% and/or latex supplier(s) 11.9% - 88.1% 17.5% - 90.2% 8.7% - 65.8% N/A - N/A 21.6% - 67.3% gloves Delayed / backordered 100.0% 41.7% 65.0% 100.0% 69.3% from supplier(s) N/A - N/A 9.8% - 82.5% 26.8% - 90.4% N/A - N/A 42.8% - 87.2% Transportation / 25.0% 0.0% 32.5% 0.0% 18.4% distribution difficulties 3.2% - 77.0% N/A - N/A 7.4% - 74.2% N/A - N/A 5.7% - 45.9% Price 25.0% 0.0% 32.5% 0.0% 18.4% 3.2% - 77.0% N/A - N/A 7.4% - 74.2% N/A - N/A 5.7% - 45.9% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 4 5 6 1 16 F-69 Table F.16 Page 2 of 3 ------- Table F.16. Question B2.2.2: For each item, what are you most concerned about? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Tyvek suite Unavailable from 50.0% 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 34.5% and/or supplier(s) 11.4% - 88.6% 16.0% - 95.5% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 14.1% - 62.9% disposable Delayed / backordered 50.0% 33.3% 50.0% 100.0% 49.4% coveralls from supplier(s) 11.4% - 88.6% 4.5% - 84.0% 16.1% - 83.9% N/A - N/A 26.2% - 72.9% Transportation / 25.0% 0.0% 25.0% 0.0% 17.2% distribution difficulties 3.0% - 78.1% N/A - N/A 2.7% - 80.1% N/A - N/A 3.9% - 51.5% Price 25.0% 0.0% 25.0% 0.0% 17.2% 3.0% - 78.1% N/A - N/A 2.7% - 80.1% N/A - N/A 3.9% - 51.5% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 4 3 4 1 12 Sanitizing Unavailable from 75.0% 100.0% 15.0% 0.0% 54.7% wipes, supplier(s) 22.1% - 97.0% N/A - N/A 2.2% - 58.2% N/A - N/A 29.6% - 77.7% sprays for Delayed / backordered 75.0% 0.0% 65.0% 100.0% 52.8% cleaning from supplier(s) 22.1% - 97.0% N/A - N/A 26.7% - 90.4% N/A - N/A 27.5% - 76.7% work Transportation / 25.0% 0.0% 32.5% 0.0% 19.8% offices, or distribution difficulties 3.0% - 77.9% N/A - N/A 7.4% - 74.2% N/A - N/A 6.0% - 48.8% gels for Price 25.0% 0.0% 32.5% 0.0% 19.8% hand 3.0% - 77.9% N/A - N/A 7.4% - 74.2% N/A - N/A 6.0% - 48.8% sanitizing Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 4 4 6 1 15 N/A: confidence interval could not be ca culated. F-70 Table F.16 Page 3 of 3 ------- Table F.17. Question B2.2.3: What steps have you taken or are you taking to prepare for potential shortages and supply chain disruptions? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All N95 masks Seek alternative supplier 100.0% 44.7% 32.5% 0.0% 54.2% and/or N/A - N/A 11.9% - 82.8% 7.1% - 75.2% N/A - N/A 29.1% - 77.4% elastomeric Increase purchasing / maintain a 50.0% 75.9% 17.5% 0.0% 42.1% respirators larger than typical inventory 11.9% - 88.1% 26.4% - 96.5% 2.2% - 66.8% N/A - N/A 20.4% - 67.3% Switch chemicals, procedures, or 25.0% 0.0% 15.0% 100.0% 18.7% technologies 3.2% - 77.0% N/A - N/A 2.2% - 57.9% N/A - N/A 6.4% - 43.7% Make arrangements w/ neighboring 25.0% 51.7% 17.5% 0.0% 28.1% utilities or mutual aid network 3.2% - 77.0% 13.1% - 88.4% 2.2% - 66.8% N/A - N/A 11.6% - 53.6% Other 0.0% 0.0% 15.0% 0.0% 5.6% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.2% - 57.9% N/A - N/A 0.9% - 28.1% Observations 4 4 6 1 15 Alternative Seek alternative supplier 100.0% 27.2% 47.4% 0.0% 53.3% mask N/A - N/A 4.2% - 76.0% 12.5% - 85.1% N/A - N/A 25.5% - 79.1% options Increase purchasing / maintain a 100.0% 100.0% 32.5% 0.0% 64.2% (surgical, larger than typical inventory N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 6.2% - 77.8% N/A - N/A 36.5% - 84.8% cloth, etc.) Switch chemicals, procedures, or 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 15.2% technologies 3.9% - 86.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 3.7% - 45.8% Make arrangements w/ neighboring 0.0% 36.4% 17.5% 0.0% 16.3% utilities or mutual aid network N/A - N/A 4.7% - 86.9% 1.8% - 70.7% N/A - N/A 3.7% - 49.4% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 3 3 6 1 13 F-71 Table F.17 Page 1 of 3 ------- Table F.17. Question B2.2.3: What steps have you taken or are you taking to prepare for potential shortages and supply chain disruptions? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Face shield Seek alternative supplier 100.0% 20.6% 25.0% 0.0% 47.4% and/or N/A - N/A 3.0% - 68.4% 2.7% - 80.0% N/A - N/A 22.1% - 74.1% protective Increase purchasing / maintain a 25.0% 75.9% 25.0% 0.0% 39.0% eye wear larger than typical inventory 3.2% - 77.1% 26.2% - 96.5% 2.7% - 80.0% N/A - N/A 16.0% - 68.2% Switch chemicals, procedures, or 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 14.7% technologies 3.2% - 77.1% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 3.5% - 45.0% Make arrangements w/ neighboring 0.0% 27.6% 25.0% 0.0% 15.8% utilities or mutual aid network N/A - N/A 3.9% - 78.4% 2.7% - 80.0% N/A - N/A 3.7% - 47.9% Other 0.0% 24.1% 0.0% 0.0% 7.4% N/A - N/A 3.5% - 73.8% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.0% - 39.1% Observations 4 4 4 1 13 Nitrile Seek alternative supplier 75.0% 36.0% 47.4% 0.0% 49.1% and/or latex 23.0% - 96.8% 8.6% - 77.0% 14.7% - 82.5% N/A - N/A 25.7% - 72.9% gloves Increase purchasing / maintain a 75.0% 61.2% 32.5% 100.0% 57.0% larger than typical inventory 23.0% - 96.8% 26.2% - 87.5% 7.4% - 74.2% N/A - N/A 33.7% - 77.6% Switch chemicals, procedures, or 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.0% technologies 3.2% - 77.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.0% - 35.6% Make arrangements w/ neighboring 0.0% 41.7% 17.5% 0.0% 19.3% utilities or mutual aid network N/A - N/A 9.8% - 82.5% 2.3% - 65.2% N/A - N/A 6.7% - 44.5% Other 0.0% 19.4% 0.0% 0.0% 6.1% N/A - N/A 2.5% - 69.6% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 0.8% - 33.6% Observations 4 5 6 1 16 F-72 Table F.17 Page 2 of 3 ------- Table F.17. Question B2.2.3: What steps have you taken or are you taking to prepare for potential shortages and supply chain disruptions? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Tyvek suite Seek alternative supplier 100.0% 28.5% 25.0% 0.0% 51.8% and/or N/A - N/A 3.8% - 79.9% 2.7% - 80.1% N/A - N/A 24.6% - 77.9% disposable Increase purchasing / maintain a 25.0% 66.7% 25.0% 0.0% 33.3% coveralls larger than typical inventory 3.0% - 78.1% 16.0% - 95.5% 2.7% - 80.1% N/A - N/A 11.6% - 65.6% Switch chemicals, procedures, or 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% technologies N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Make arrangements w/ neighboring 0.0% 38.2% 25.0% 0.0% 17.2% utilities or mutual aid network N/A - N/A 5.8% - 86.2% 2.7% - 80.1% N/A - N/A 3.9% - 51.5% Other 0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 8.0% N/A - N/A 4.5% - 84.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.1% - 41.8% Observations 4 3 4 1 12 Sanitizing Seek alternative supplier 75.0% 71.3% 47.4% 0.0% 59.4% wipes, 22.1% - 97.0% 23.5% - 95.3% 14.7% - 82.5% N/A - N/A 33.3% - 81.1% sprays for Increase purchasing / maintain a 75.0% 75.0% 32.5% 0.0% 54.7% cleaning larger than typical inventory 22.1% - 97.0% 21.7% - 97.0% 7.4% - 74.2% N/A - N/A 29.6% - 77.7% work Switch chemicals, procedures, or 50.0% 0.0% 15.0% 100.0% 26.4% offices, or technologies 11.5% - 88.5% N/A - N/A 2.2% - 58.2% N/A - N/A 10.5% - 52.3% gels for Make arrangements w/ neighboring 0.0% 53.6% 17.5% 0.0% 20.8% hand utilities or mutual aid network N/A - N/A 13.1% - 89.9% 2.3% - 65.2% N/A - N/A 7.1% - 47.4% Other 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.6% 3.0% - 77.9% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.1% - 38.1% Observations 4 4 6 1 15 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-73 Table F.17 Page 3 of 3 ------- Table F.18. Question B2.3.1: How severe are your concerns about shortages or supply chain disruptions involving durable goods and other critical equipment and supplies, etc.? Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Filter media Mean score (0 to 3) 0.343 0.103 0.338 0.000 0.245 0.047 - 0.639 -0.073 - 0.278 0.001 - 0.674 0.000 - 0.000 0.091 - 0.399 None (0) 65.7% 89.7% 75.0% 100.0% 78.4% 34.0% - 87.7% 56.6% - 98.3% 47.0% - 91.0% N/A - N/A 63.1% - 88.5% Slight (1) 34.3% 10.3% 16.2% 0.0% 18.7% 12.3% - 66.0% 1.7% - 43.4% 4.5% - 44.3% N/A - N/A 9.6% - 33.3% Moderate (2) 0.0% 0.0% 8.8% 0.0% 2.9% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.4% - 38.7% N/A - N/A 0.5% - 15.6% Severe(3) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 9 11 12 2 34 Granular/ Mean score (0 to 3) 0.114 0.103 0.250 0.000 0.149 Powdered -0.088 - 0.317 -0.073 - 0.278 0.021 - 0.479 0.000 - 0.000 0.035 - 0.264 Activated None (0) 88.6% 89.7% 75.0% 100.0% 85.1% Carbon (GAC/ 51.3% - 98.3% 56.6% - 98.3% 47.0% - 91.0% N/A - N/A 69.9% - 93.3% PAC) Slight (1) 11.4% 10.3% 25.0% 0.0% 14.9% 1.7% - 48.7% 1.7% - 43.4% 9.0% - 53.0% N/A - N/A 6.7% - 30.1% Moderate (2) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Severe(3) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 9 11 12 2 34 F-74 Table F.18 Page 1 of 5 ------- Table F.18. Question B2.3.1: How severe are your concerns about shortages or supply chain disruptions involving durable goods and other critical equipment and supplies, etc.? Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Membrane Mean score (0 to 3) 0.114 0.103 0.338 0.000 0.178 modules -0.088 - 0.317 -0.073 - 0.278 0.001 - 0.674 0.000 - 0.000 0.035 - 0.322 None (0) 88.6% 89.7% 75.0% 100.0% 85.1% 51.3% - 98.3% 56.6% - 98.3% 47.0% - 91.0% N/A - N/A 69.9% - 93.3% Slight (1) 11.4% 10.3% 16.2% 0.0% 12.0% 1.7% - 48.7% 1.7% - 43.4% 4.5% - 44.3% N/A - N/A 4.9% - 26.7% Moderate (2) 0.0% 0.0% 8.8% 0.0% 2.9% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.4% - 38.7% N/A - N/A 0.5% - 15.6% Severe(3) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 9 11 12 2 34 Pumps Mean score (0 to 3) 0.457 0.525 0.250 0.000 0.386 0.025 - 0.890 0.002 - 1.049 0.021 - 0.479 0.000 - 0.000 0.158 - 0.614 None (0) 65.7% 73.1% 75.0% 100.0% 73.0% 34.0% - 87.7% 43.8% - 90.4% 47.0% - 91.0% N/A - N/A 57.2% - 84.6% Slight (1) 22.9% 10.3% 25.0% 0.0% 18.3% 6.2% - 57.1% 1.7% - 43.4% 9.0% - 53.0% N/A - N/A 9.0% - 33.7% Moderate (2) 11.4% 7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 5.8% 1.7% - 48.7% 1.4% - 33.2% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.6% - 19.0% Severe(3) 0.0% 9.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.9% N/A - N/A 1.5% - 39.4% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 0.5% - 15.6% Observations 9 11 12 2 34 F-75 Table F.18 Page 2 of 5 ------- Table F.18. Question B2.3.1: How severe are your concerns about shortages or supply chain disruptions involving durable goods and other critical equipment and supplies, etc.? Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Motors Mean score (0 to 3) 0.457 0.525 0.338 0.000 0.415 0.025 - 0.890 0.002 - 1.049 0.088 - 0.587 0.000 - 0.000 0.185 - 0.646 None (0) 65.7% 73.1% 66.2% 100.0% 70.1% 34.0% - 87.7% 43.8% - 90.4% 39.1% - 85.7% N/A - N/A 54.0% - 82.4% Slight (1) 22.9% 10.3% 33.8% 0.0% 21.2% 6.2% - 57.1% 1.7% - 43.4% 14.3% - 60.9% N/A - N/A 11.0% - 37.0% Moderate (2) 11.4% 7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 5.8% 1.7% - 48.7% 1.4% - 33.2% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.6% - 19.0% Severe(3) 0.0% 9.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.9% N/A - N/A 1.5% - 39.4% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 0.5% - 15.6% Observations 9 11 12 2 34 Pipes Mean score (0 to 3) 0.757 0.256 0.250 0.000 0.386 0.159 - 1.354 -0.040 - 0.553 0.021 - 0.479 0.000 - 0.000 0.158 - 0.614 None (0) 55.7% 82.0% 75.0% 100.0% 73.0% 26.3% - 81.6% 52.7% - 94.9% 47.0% - 91.0% N/A - N/A 57.2% - 84.6% Slight (1) 22.9% 10.3% 25.0% 0.0% 18.3% 6.2% - 57.1% 1.7% - 43.4% 9.0% - 53.0% N/A - N/A 9.0% - 33.7% Moderate (2) 11.4% 7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 5.8% 1.7% - 48.7% 1.4% - 33.2% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.6% - 19.0% Severe(3) 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.9% 1.8% - 40.7% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 0.5% - 15.6% Observations 9 11 12 2 34 F-76 Table F.18 Page 3 of 5 ------- Table F.18. Question B2.3.1: How severe are your concerns about shortages or supply chain disruptions involving durable goods and other critical equipment and supplies, etc.? Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Valves Mean score (0 to 3) 0.457 0.628 0.250 0.000 0.419 0.025 - 0.890 0.108 - 1.148 0.021 - 0.479 0.000 - 0.000 0.192 - 0.647 None (0) 65.7% 62.8% 75.0% 100.0% 69.7% 34.0% - 87.7% 35.4% - 83.9% 47.0% - 91.0% N/A - N/A 54.2% - 81.7% Slight (1) 22.9% 20.6% 25.0% 0.0% 21.6% 6.2% - 57.1% 6.4% - 49.6% 9.0% - 53.0% N/A - N/A 11.5% - 36.9% Moderate (2) 11.4% 7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 5.8% 1.7% - 48.7% 1.4% - 33.2% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.6% - 19.0% Severe(3) 0.0% 9.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.9% N/A - N/A 1.5% - 39.4% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 0.5% - 15.6% Observations 9 11 12 2 34 Fuel Mean score (0 to 3) 0.457 0.193 0.162 0.000 0.249 0.025 - 0.890 -0.031 - 0.416 -0.029 - 0.354 0.000 - 0.000 0.093 - 0.406 None (0) 65.7% 80.7% 83.8% 100.0% 78.4% 34.0% - 87.7% 49.8% - 94.7% 55.7% - 95.5% N/A - N/A 63.1% - 88.5% Slight (1) 22.9% 19.3% 16.2% 0.0% 18.3% 6.2% - 57.1% 5.3% - 50.2% 4.5% - 44.3% N/A - N/A 9.0% - 33.7% Moderate (2) 11.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.3% 1.7% - 48.7% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 0.5% - 18.0% Severe(3) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 9 11 12 2 34 F-77 Table F.18 Page 4 of 5 ------- Table F.18. Question B2.3.1: How severe are your concerns about shortages or supply chain disruptions involving durable goods and other critical equipment and supplies, etc.? Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Vehicles Mean score (0 to 3) 0.229 0.103 0.162 0.000 0.154 -0.036 - 0.494 -0.073 - 0.278 -0.029 - 0.354 0.000 - 0.000 0.041 - 0.266 None (0) 77.1% 89.7% 83.8% 100.0% 84.6% 42.9% - 93.8% 56.6% - 98.3% 55.7% - 95.5% N/A - N/A 69.8% - 92.9% Slight (1) 22.9% 10.3% 16.2% 0.0% 15.4% 6.2% - 57.1% 1.7% - 43.4% 4.5% - 44.3% N/A - N/A 7.1% - 30.2% Moderate (2) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Severe(3) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 9 11 12 2 34 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-78 Table F.18 Page 5 of 5 ------- Table F.19. Question B2.3.2: For each item, what are you most concerned about? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Filter media Unavailable from 33.3% 100.0% 0.0% 30.8% supplier(s) 3.2% - 88.5% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 8.2% - 69.1% Delayed / backordered 66.7% 0.0% 100.0% 69.2% from supplier(s) 11.5% - 96.8% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 30.9% - 91.8% Transportation / 0.0% 0.0% 35.0% 13.4% distribution difficulties N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.5% - 91.8% 1.6% - 60.3% Price 0.0% 0.0% 35.0% 13.4% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.5% - 91.8% 1.6% - 60.3% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 3 1 3 7 Granular/ Unavailable from 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 22.3% Powdered supplier(s) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.2% - 78.7% Activated Delayed / backordered 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 77.7% Carbon (GAC/ from supplier(s) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 21.3% - 97.8% PAC) Transportation / 0.0% 0.0% 35.0% 19.4% distribution difficulties N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.4% - 92.1% 2.0% - 74.2% Price 0.0% 0.0% 35.0% 19.4% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.4% - 92.1% 2.0% - 74.2% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 1 1 3 5 F-79 Table F.19 Page 1 of 5 ------- Table F.19. Question B2.3.2: For each item, what are you most concerned about? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Membrane Unavailable from 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 22.3% modules supplier(s) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.1% - 79.5% Delayed / backordered 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 77.7% from supplier(s) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 20.5% - 97.9% Transportation / 0.0% 0.0% 35.0% 19.4% distribution difficulties N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.3% - 92.5% 1.9% - 75.1% Price 0.0% 0.0% 35.0% 19.4% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.3% - 92.5% 1.9% - 75.1% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 1 1 3 5 Pumps Unavailable from 33.3% 100.0% 0.0% 44.6% supplier(s) 3.3% - 88.1% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 14.6% - 79.2% Delayed / backordered 100.0% 28.5% 100.0% 76.9% from supplier(s) N/A - N/A 3.7% - 80.5% N/A - N/A 36.3% - 95.1% Transportation / 0.0% 0.0% 35.0% 10.8% distribution difficulties N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 3.3% - 89.5% 1.4% - 51.3% Price 0.0% 0.0% 35.0% 10.8% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 3.3% - 89.5% 1.4% - 51.3% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 3 3 3 9 F-80 Table F.19 Page 2 of 5 ------- Table F.19. Question B2.3.2: For each item, what are you most concerned about? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Motors Unavailable from 33.3% 100.0% 25.9% 50.0% supplier(s) 3.3% - 88.1% N/A - N/A 2.7% - 81.4% 19.0% - 81.0% Delayed / backordered 100.0% 28.5% 74.1% 69.4% from supplier(s) N/A - N/A 3.7% - 80.4% 18.6% - 97.3% 35.3% - 90.4% Transportation / 0.0% 0.0% 51.9% 19.4% distribution difficulties N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 11.6% - 89.8% 5.7% - 48.9% Price 0.0% 0.0% 25.9% 9.7% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.7% - 81.4% 1.3% - 47.6% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 3 3 4 10 Pipes Unavailable from 48.3% 100.0% 0.0% 44.6% supplier(s) 10.4% - 88.3% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 14.6% - 79.2% Delayed / backordered 100.0% 42.7% 65.0% 76.9% from supplier(s) N/A - N/A 4.8% - 91.7% 10.5% - 96.7% 36.2% - 95.1% Transportation / 22.5% 0.0% 35.0% 21.5% distribution difficulties 3.6% - 69.1% N/A - N/A 3.3% - 89.5% 7.4% - 48.5% Price 0.0% 0.0% 35.0% 10.8% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 3.3% - 89.5% 1.4% - 51.4% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 4 2 3 9 F-81 Table F.19 Page 3 of 5 ------- Table F.19. Question B2.3.2: For each item, what are you most concerned about? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Valves Unavailable from 33.3% 72.4% 0.0% 39.7% supplier(s) 3.6% - 86.9% 20.1% - 96.4% N/A - N/A 13.2% - 74.0% Delayed / backordered 100.0% 48.3% 65.0% 69.9% from supplier(s) N/A - N/A 10.7% - 87.9% 10.5% - 96.7% 38.2% - 89.7% Transportation / 0.0% 0.0% 35.0% 9.6% distribution difficulties N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 3.3% - 89.5% 1.2% - 47.4% Price 0.0% 0.0% 35.0% 9.6% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 3.3% - 89.5% 1.2% - 47.4% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 3 4 3 10 Fuel Unavailable from 0.0% 53.4% 0.0% 15.4% supplier(s) N/A - N/A 6.8% - 94.7% N/A - N/A 1.8% - 63.8% Delayed / backordered 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 15.4% from supplier(s) 3.2% - 88.3% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.8% - 63.8% Transportation / 66.7% 0.0% 53.9% 44.3% distribution difficulties 11.7% - 96.8% N/A - N/A 14.1% - 89.3% 12.1% - 82.1% Price 0.0% 0.0% 46.1% 11.5% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 10.7% - 85.9% 11.5% - 11.5% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 3 2 2 7 F-82 Table F.19 Page 4 of 5 ------- Table F.19. Question B2.3.2: For each item, what are you most concerned about? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Vehicles Unavailable from 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 21.7% supplier(s) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.3% - 76.8% Delayed / backordered 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 21.7% from supplier(s) 3.3% - 96.7% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.3% - 76.8% Transportation / 50.0% 0.0% 53.9% 40.5% distribution difficulties 3.3% - 96.7% N/A - N/A 53.9% - 53.9% 10.6% - 79.7% Price 0.0% 0.0% 46.1% 16.2% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 46.1% - 46.1% 16.2% - 16.2% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 2 1 2 5 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-83 Table F.19 Page 5 of 5 ------- Table F.20. Question B2.3.3: What steps have you taken or are you taking to prepare for potential shortages and supply chain disruptions? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Filter media Seek alternative supplier 33.3% 100.0% 0.0% 30.8% 3.2% - 88.5% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 8.2% - 69.1% Increase purchasing / maintain 66.7% 0.0% 65.0% 55.7% a larger than typical inventory 11.5% - 96.8% N/A - N/A 8.2% - 97.5% 17.8% - 88.0% Switch chemicals, procedures, 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% or technologies N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Make arrangements with neighbor- 0.0% 0.0% 35.0% 13.4% ing utilities or mutual aid network N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.5% - 91.8% 1.6% - 60.3% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 3 1 3 7 Granular/ Seek alternative supplier 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 22.3% Powdered N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.2% - 78.7% Activated Increase purchasing / maintain 100.0% 0.0% 65.0% 58.3% Carbon (GAC/ a larger than typical inventory N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 7.9% - 97.6% 11.1% - 94.0% PAC) Switch chemicals, procedures, 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% or technologies N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Make arrangements with neighbor- 0.0% 0.0% 35.0% 19.4% ing utilities or mutual aid network N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.4% - 92.1% 2.0% - 74.2% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 1 1 3 5 F-84 Table F.20 Page 1 of 5 ------- Table F.20. Question B2.3.3: What steps have you taken or are you taking to prepare for potential shortages and supply chain disruptions? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Membrane Seek alternative supplier 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 22.3% modules N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.1% - 79.5% Increase purchasing / maintain 100.0% 0.0% 65.0% 58.3% a larger than typical inventory N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 7.5% - 97.7% 10.6% - 94.3% Switch chemicals, procedures, 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% or technologies N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Make arrangements with neighbor- 0.0% 0.0% 35.0% 19.4% ing utilities or mutual aid network N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.3% - 92.5% 1.9% - 75.1% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 1 1 3 5 Pumps Seek alternative supplier 33.3% 66.7% 0.0% 33.9% 3.3% - 88.1% 15.8% - 95.5% N/A - N/A 10.8% - 68.4% Increase purchasing / maintain 66.7% 0.0% 65.0% 44.6% a larger than typical inventory 11.9% - 96.7% N/A - N/A 10.5% - 96.7% 14.6% - 79.2% Switch chemicals, procedures, 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% or technologies N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Make arrangements with neighbor- 0.0% 0.0% 35.0% 10.8% ing utilities or mutual aid network N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 3.3% - 89.5% 1.4% - 51.3% Other 0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 10.8% N/A - N/A 4.5% - 84.2% N/A - N/A 1.4% - 51.3% Observations 3 3 3 9 F-85 Table F.20 Page 2 of 5 ------- Table F.20. Question B2.3.3: What steps have you taken or are you taking to prepare for potential shortages and supply chain disruptions? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Motors Seek alternative supplier 33.3% 66.7% 0.0% 30.6% 3.3% - 88.1% 15.9% - 95.5% N/A - N/A 10.0% - 63.5% Increase purchasing / maintain 66.7% 0.0% 74.1% 50.0% a larger than typical inventory 11.9% - 96.7% N/A - N/A 18.6% - 97.3% 19.0% - 81.0% Switch chemicals, procedures, 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% or technologies N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Make arrangements with neighbor- 0.0% 0.0% 25.9% 9.7% ing utilities or mutual aid network N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.7% - 81.4% 1.3% - 47.6% Other 0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 9.7% N/A - N/A 4.5% - 84.1% N/A - N/A 1.3% - 47.6% Observations 3 3 4 10 Pipes Seek alternative supplier 25.8% 100.0% 0.0% 33.9% 2.8% - 80.9% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 10.8% - 68.4% Increase purchasing / maintain 51.7% 0.0% 65.0% 44.6% a larger than typical inventory 11.7% - 89.6% N/A - N/A 10.5% - 96.7% 14.6% - 79.2% Switch chemicals, procedures, 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% or technologies N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Make arrangements with neighbor- 22.5% 0.0% 35.0% 21.5% ing utilities or mutual aid network 3.6% - 69.1% N/A - N/A 3.3% - 89.5% 7.4% - 48.5% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 4 2 3 9 F-86 Table F.20 Page 3 of 5 ------- Table F.20. Question B2.3.3: What steps have you taken or are you taking to prepare for potential shortages and supply chain disruptions? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Valves Seek alternative supplier 33.3% 48.3% 0.0% 30.2% 3.6% - 86.9% 10.7% - 87.9% N/A - N/A 9.5% - 64.0% Increase purchasing / maintain 66.7% 27.6% 65.0% 50.7% a larger than typical inventory 13.1% - 96.4% 3.6% - 79.9% 10.5% - 96.7% 20.2% - 80.7% Switch chemicals, procedures, 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% or technologies N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Make arrangements with neighbor- 0.0% 0.0% 35.0% 9.6% ing utilities or mutual aid network N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 3.3% - 89.5% 1.2% - 47.4% Other 0.0% 24.1% 0.0% 9.6% N/A - N/A 3.5% - 73.6% N/A - N/A 1.2% - 47.4% Observations 3 4 3 10 Fuel Seek alternative supplier 33.3% 53.4% 0.0% 30.8% 3.2% - 88.3% 6.8% - 94.7% N/A - N/A 8.2% - 68.9% Increase purchasing / maintain 66.7% 0.0% 46.1% 42.3% a larger than typical inventory 11.7% - 96.8% N/A - N/A 10.7% - 85.9% 15.3% - 74.8% Switch chemicals, procedures, 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% or technologies N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Make arrangements with neighbor- 0.0% 0.0% 53.9% 13.4% ing utilities or mutual aid network N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 14.1% - 89.3% 1.6% - 60.0% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 3 2 2 7 F-87 Table F.20 Page 4 of 5 ------- Table F.20. Question B2.3.3: What steps have you taken or are you taking to prepare for potential shortages and supply chain disruptions? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Supply Percentage Reporting by Population Served Chain Issue Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Vehicles Seek alternative supplier 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 21.7% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.3% - 76.8% Increase purchasing / maintain 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 21.7% a larger than typical inventory 3.3% - 96.7% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.3% - 76.8% Switch chemicals, procedures, 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% or technologies N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Make arrangements with neighbor- 50.0% 0.0% 53.9% 40.5% ing utilities or mutual aid network 3.3% - 96.7% N/A - N/A 53.9% - 53.9% 10.6% - 79.7% Other 0.0% 0.0% 46.1% 16.2% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 46.1% - 46.1% 16.2% - 16.2% Observations 2 1 2 5 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-88 Table F.20 Page 5 of 5 ------- Table F.21. Question B3: Has your organization made any requests for personnel, supplies, or equipment to your tribal, local, or state emergency operations center (EOC), primacy agency, or similar organization? Alaska Native Village Utilities Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Percentage Reporting by Population Served Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Yes, entirely fulfilled 25.4% 18.3% 8.8% 0.0% 15.9% 6.8% - 61.3% 5.1% - 48.2% 1.4% - 39.5% N/A - N/A 7.0% - 31.9% Yes, partly fulfilled 49.2% 39.4% 41.2% 0.0% 40.5% 20.5% - 78.4% 16.3% - 68.5% 19.2% - 67.4% N/A - N/A 25.8% - 57.2% Yes, not fulfilled 0.0% 9.9% 0.0% 0.0% 3.1% N/A - N/A 1.6% - 42.7% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 0.5% - 16.8% No, support was not needed 0.0% 22.6% 35.0% 0.0% 19.4% N/A - N/A 7.0% - 53.2% 15.7% - 61.0% N/A - N/A 9.5% - 35.5% No, but we would have used it if it had 0.0% 9.9% 7.5% 46.1% 8.4% been available or if we had known of it N/A - N/A 1.6% - 42.7% 1.3% - 33.1% 6.8% - 91.0% 3.1% - 20.6% Do not know 25.4% 0.0% 7.5% 53.9% 12.8% 6.8% - 61.3% N/A - N/A 1.3% - 33.1% 9.0% - 93.2% 5.2% - 28.3% Observations 8 10 12 2 32 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-89 Table F.21 Page 1 of 1 ------- Table F.22. Question C.l: To what extent did your organization experience shortages of key personnel, including contractors performing critical functions to maintain operations, from January 2020 through present day? Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Personnel Percentage Reporting by Population Served Type Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Licensed or Mean Score (0- 0.77 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.36 certified 3) 0.20 - 1.34 0.00 - 0.00 0.02 - 0.68 0.00 - 0.00 0.13 - 0.59 operators No Shortage 55.7% 100.0% 73.7% 100.0% 77.1% (0) 26.2% - 81.7% N/A - N/A 46.1% - 90.2% N/A - N/A 60.7% - 88.0% Slight Shortage 11.4% 0.0% 17.5% 0.0% 9.7% (1) 1.7% - 48.8% N/A - N/A 5.0% - 46.3% N/A - N/A 3.4% - 24.8% Moderate 32.8% 0.0% 8.8% 0.0% 13.2% Shortage (2) 11.5% - 64.9% N/A - N/A 1.4% - 39.5% N/A - N/A 5.4% - 29.0% Severe 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Shorage(3) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Laboratory Mean Score (0- 0.21 0.38 0.47 0.00 0.34 technicians/ 3) -0.04 - 0.46 -0.26 - 1.01 -0.03 - 0.98 0.00 - 0.00 0.07 - 0.60 sample analysts No Shortage 78.6% 87.5% 71.6% 100.0% 80.1% (0) 45.4% - 94.2% 50.2% - 98.0% 42.7% - 89.5% N/A - N/A 63.6% - 90.2% Slight Shortage 21.4% 0.0% 18.9% 0.0% 13.1% (1) 5.8% - 54.6% N/A - N/A 5.3% - 49.3% N/A - N/A 5.4% - 28.7% Moderate 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Shortage (2) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Severe 0.0% 12.5% 9.5% 0.0% 6.8% Shorage(3) N/A - N/A 2.0% - 49.8% 1.5% - 41.9% N/A - N/A 1.8% - 22.2% F-90 Table F.22 Page 1 of 4 ------- Table F.22. Question C.l: To what extent did your organization experience shortages of key personnel, including contractors performing critical functions to maintain operations, from January 2020 through present day? Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Personnel Percentage Reporting by Population Served Type Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Field Workers Mean Score (0- 0.67 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.39 (meter reading, 3) 0.15 - 1.19 0.00 - 0.00 0.04 - 0.99 0.00 - 0.00 0.14 - 0.64 sampling, No Shortage 55.7% 100.0% 66.2% 100.0% 74.4% maintenance, (0) 26.2% - 81.7% N/A - N/A 38.8% - 85.9% N/A - N/A 57.7% - 86.2% etc.) Slight Shortage 21.4% 0.0% 25.0% 0.0% 15.4% (1) 5.8% - 54.6% N/A - N/A 8.8% - 53.4% N/A - N/A 6.9% - 31.0% Moderate 22.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.1% Shortage (2) 6.2% - 57.1% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.1% - 21.6% Severe 0.0% 0.0% 8.8% 0.0% 3.1% Shorage(3) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.4% - 39.5% N/A - N/A 0.5% - 16.8% Engineering/ Mean Score (0- 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.92 0.26 design/ 3) 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 -0.01 - 1.21 -0.30 - 2.15 0.02 - 0.51 construction No Shortage 100.0% 100.0% 75.0% 53.9% 88.6% personnel (0) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 46.6% - 91.2% 9.0% - 93.2% 75.2% - 95.2% Slight Shortage 0.0% 0.0% 7.5% 0.0% 2.6% (1) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.3% - 33.1% N/A - N/A 0.5% - 13.4% Moderate 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 46.1% 2.6% Shortage (2) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 6.8% - 91.0% 0.5% - 13.4% Severe 0.0% 0.0% 17.5% 0.0% 6.2% Shorage(3) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 5.0% - 46.3% N/A - N/A 1.8% - 19.4% F-91 Table F.22 Page 2 of 4 ------- Table F.22. Question C.l: To what extent did your organization experience shortages of key personnel, including contractors performing critical functions to maintain operations, from January 2020 through present day? Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Personnel Percentage Reporting by Population Served Type Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Critial Mean Score (0- 0.56 0.61 0.35 0.92 0.52 equipment 3) 0.02 - 1.09 -0.09 - 1.31 -0.12 - 0.82 -0.30 - 2.15 0.20 - 0.84 repair No Shortage 67.2% 79.7% 82.5% 53.9% 75.3% (0) 35.1% - 88.5% 48.2% - 94.3% 53.7% - 95.0% 9.0% - 93.2% 58.8% - 86.7% Slight Shortage 10.0% 0.0% 8.8% 0.0% 6.2% (1) 1.7% - 41.3% N/A - N/A 1.4% - 39.5% N/A - N/A 1.8% - 19.4% Moderate 22.9% 0.0% 0.0% 46.1% 9.7% Shortage (2) 6.2% - 57.1% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 6.8% - 91.0% 3.5% - 24.2% Severe 0.0% 20.3% 8.8% 0.0% 8.8% Shorage(3) N/A - N/A 5.7% - 51.8% 1.4% - 39.5% N/A - N/A 3.1% - 22.3% Administrative Mean Score (0- 0.44 0.09 0.16 0.92 0.27 3) 0.01 - 0.88 -0.06 - 0.25 -0.03 - 0.36 -0.30 - 2.15 0.09 - 0.45 No Shortage 67.2% 90.7% 83.8% 53.9% 78.9% (0) 35.1% - 88.5% 61.2% - 98.4% 55.4% - 95.5% 9.0% - 93.2% 63.2% - 89.0% Slight Shortage 21.4% 9.3% 16.2% 0.0% 15.0% (1) 5.8% - 54.6% 1.6% - 38.8% 4.5% - 44.6% N/A - N/A 6.7% - 30.1% Moderate 11.4% 0.0% 0.0% 46.1% 6.2% Shortage (2) 1.7% - 48.8% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 6.8% - 91.0% 1.7% - 20.1% Severe 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Shorage(3) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A F-92 Table F.22 Page 3 of 4 ------- Table F.22. Question C.l: To what extent did your organization experience shortages of key personnel, including contractors performing critical functions to maintain operations, from January 2020 through present day? Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Personnel Percentage Reporting by Population Served Type Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Customer Mean Score (0- 0.33 0.00 0.41 0.92 0.30 Service 3) -0.09 - 0.75 0.00 - 0.00 -0.10 - 0.93 -0.30 - 2.15 0.06 - 0.54 No Shortage 78.6% 100.0% 83.8% 53.9% 85.0% (0) 45.4% - 94.2% N/A - N/A 55.4% - 95.5% 9.0% - 93.2% 69.9% - 93.3% Slight Shortage 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.1% (1) 1.7% - 41.3% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 0.5% - 16.8% Moderate 11.4% 0.0% 7.5% 46.1% 8.8% Shortage (2) 1.7% - 48.8% N/A - N/A 1.3% - 33.1% 6.8% - 91.0% 3.2% - 21.9% Severe 0.0% 0.0% 8.8% 0.0% 3.1% Shorage(3) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.4% - 39.5% N/A - N/A 0.5% - 16.8% Other Mean Score (0- 3) 2.08 2.08 - 2.08 2.08 2.08 - 2.08 No Shortage 0.0% 0.0% (0) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Slight Shortage 46.1% 46.1% (1) 46.1% - 46.1% 46.1% - 46.1% Moderate 0.0% 0.0% Shortage (2) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Severe 53.9% 53.9% Shorage(3) 53.9% - 53.9% 53.9% - 53.9% Observations 9 9 12 2 32 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-93 Table F.22 Page 4 of 4 ------- Table F.23. Question C.2: To what extent do you expect to experience shortages of key personnel, including contractors performing critical functions to maintain operations, from present day through December 2020? Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Personnel Percentage Reporting by Population Served Type Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Licensed or Mean Score (0- 0.51 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.27 certified 3) 0.03 - 0.98 0.00 - 0.00 0.08 - 0.59 0.00 - 0.00 0.09 - 0.45 operators No Shortage 61.9% 100.0% 66.2% 100.0% 76.8% (0) 29.1% - 86.5% N/A - N/A 38.6% - 86.0% N/A - N/A 59.7% - 88.1% Slight Shortage 25.4% 0.0% 33.8% 0.0% 19.5% (1) 6.8% - 61.4% N/A - N/A 14.0% - 61.4% N/A - N/A 9.4% - 36.4% Moderate 12.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.6% Shortage (2) 1.9% - 52.3% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 0.6% - 19.6% Severe 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Shorage(3) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Laboratory Mean Score (0- 0.13 0.09 0.28 0.00 0.16 technicians/ 3) -0.10 - 0.35 -0.06 - 0.25 -0.22 - 0.78 0.00 - 0.00 -0.03 - 0.36 sample analysts No Shortage 87.3% 90.7% 90.5% 100.0% 90.2% (0) 47.7% - 98.1% 60.1% - 98.4% 57.7% - 98.5% N/A - N/A 74.4% - 96.7% Slight Shortage 12.7% 9.3% 0.0% 0.0% 6.5% (1) 1.9% - 52.3% 1.6% - 39.9% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.8% - 21.4% Moderate 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Shortage (2) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Severe 0.0% 0.0% 9.5% 0.0% 3.3% Shorage(3) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.5% - 42.3% N/A - N/A 0.5% - 17.9% F-94 Table F.23 Page 1 of 4 ------- Table F.23. Question C.2: To what extent do you expect to experience shortages of key personnel, including contractors performing critical functions to maintain operations, from present day through December 2020? Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Personnel Percentage Reporting by Population Served Type Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Field Workers Mean Score (0- 0.67 0.25 0.57 0.00 0.48 (meter reading, 3) 0.25 - 1.09 -0.17 - 0.68 -0.01 - 1.16 0.00 - 0.00 0.21 - 0.76 sampling, No Shortage 44.3% 87.5% 75.0% 100.0% 70.5% maintenance, (0) 18.3% - 73.8% 50.2% - 98.0% 46.6% - 91.2% N/A - N/A 54.3% - 82.7% etc.) Slight Shortage 44.3% 0.0% 8.8% 0.0% 16.8% (1) 18.3% - 73.8% N/A - N/A 1.4% - 39.5% N/A - N/A 7.7% - 32.6% Moderate 11.4% 12.5% 0.0% 0.0% 7.1% Shortage (2) 1.7% - 48.8% 2.0% - 49.8% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.1% - 21.6% Severe 0.0% 0.0% 16.2% 0.0% 5.7% Shorage(3) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 4.5% - 44.6% N/A - N/A 1.6% - 18.5% Engineering/ Mean Score (0- 0.13 0.00 0.57 0.46 0.26 design/ 3) -0.10 - 0.35 0.00 - 0.00 -0.09 - 1.23 -0.16 - 1.08 0.01 - 0.52 construction No Shortage 87.3% 100.0% 81.1% 53.9% 86.9% personnel (0) 47.7% - 98.1% N/A - N/A 50.4% - 94.7% 8.7% - 93.5% 70.7% - 94.8% Slight Shortage 12.7% 0.0% 0.0% 46.1% 6.5% (1) 1.9% - 52.3% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 6.5% - 91.3% 1.8% - 21.4% Moderate 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Shortage (2) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Severe 0.0% 0.0% 18.9% 0.0% 6.5% Shorage(3) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 5.3% - 49.6% N/A - N/A 1.9% - 20.6% F-95 Table F.23 Page 2 of 4 ------- Table F.23. Question C.2: To what extent do you expect to experience shortages of key personnel, including contractors performing critical functions to maintain operations, from present day through December 2020? Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Personnel Percentage Reporting by Population Served Type Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Critial Mean Score (0- 0.13 0.19 0.43 0.00 0.25 equipment 3) -0.10 - 0.35 -0.12 - 0.50 -0.05 - 0.90 0.00 - 0.00 0.03 - 0.46 repair No Shortage 87.3% 90.7% 75.0% 100.0% 84.6% (0) 47.7% - 98.1% 61.2% - 98.4% 46.4% - 91.2% N/A - N/A 68.9% - 93.1% Slight Shortage 12.7% 0.0% 16.2% 0.0% 9.5% (1) 1.9% - 52.3% N/A - N/A 4.4% - 44.8% N/A - N/A 3.3% - 24.8% Moderate 0.0% 9.3% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7% Shortage (2) N/A - N/A 1.6% - 38.8% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 0.5% - 13.8% Severe 0.0% 0.0% 8.8% 0.0% 3.2% Shorage(3) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.4% - 39.9% N/A - N/A 0.5% - 17.4% Administrative Mean Score (0- 0.38 0.00 0.24 0.46 0.22 3) 0.06 - 0.71 0.00 - 0.00 -0.05 - 0.53 -0.15 - 1.08 0.07 - 0.37 No Shortage 61.9% 100.0% 83.8% 53.9% 80.4% (0) 29.1% - 86.5% N/A - N/A 55.2% - 95.6% 8.9% - 93.3% 64.3% - 90.4% Slight Shortage 38.1% 0.0% 8.8% 46.1% 16.8% (1) 13.5% - 70.9% N/A - N/A 1.4% - 39.9% 6.7% - 91.1% 7.7% - 32.9% Moderate 0.0% 0.0% 7.5% 0.0% 2.7% Shortage (2) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.3% - 33.0% N/A - N/A 0.5% - 13.8% Severe 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Shorage(3) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A F-96 Table F.23 Page 3 of 4 ------- Table F.23. Question C.2: To what extent do you expect to experience shortages of key personnel, including contractors performing critical functions to maintain operations, from present day through December 2020? Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Personnel Percentage Reporting by Population Served Type Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Customer Mean Score (0- 0.13 0.00 0.41 0.46 0.21 Service 3) -0.10 - 0.35 0.00 - 0.00 -0.11 - 0.93 -0.15 - 1.08 0.01 - 0.42 No Shortage 87.3% 100.0% 83.8% 53.9% 87.7% (0) 47.7% - 98.1% N/A - N/A 55.2% - 95.6% 8.9% - 93.3% 72.9% - 95.0% Slight Shortage 12.7% 0.0% 0.0% 46.1% 6.4% (1) 1.9% - 52.3% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 6.7% - 91.1% 1.7% - 20.7% Moderate 0.0% 0.0% 7.5% 0.0% 2.7% Shortage (2) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.3% - 33.0% N/A - N/A 0.5% - 13.8% Severe 0.0% 0.0% 8.8% 0.0% 3.2% Shorage(3) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.4% - 39.9% N/A - N/A 0.5% - 17.4% Other Mean Score (0- 3) 2.08 2.08 - 2.08 2.08 2.08 - 2.08 No Shortage 0.0% 0.0% (0) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Slight Shortage 46.1% 46.1% (1) 46.1% - 46.1% 46.1% - 46.1% Moderate 0.0% 0.0% Shortage (2) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Severe 53.9% 53.9% Shorage(3) 53.9% - 53.9% 53.9% - 53.9% Observations 9 9 12 2 32 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-97 Table F.23 Page 4 of 4 ------- Table F.24. Question C.3: What factors contribute to personnel shortages you identified in questions C.l and C.2? (check all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Percentage Reporting by Population Served Factor Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Absenteeism Mean Score 1.41 1.15 1.73 1.00 1.44 (illness, care of (0-2) 0.95 - 1.87 -0.13 - 2.43 1.25 - 2.21 1.00 - 1.00 1.07 - 1.80 family members, Does Not 0.0% 42.7% 0.0% 0.0% 7.0% daycare closure, Contribute (0) N/A - N/A 5.2% - 91.1% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.1% - 34.8% virtual schooling, Contributes 58.9% 0.0% 26.9% 100.0% 42.4% etc.) Somewhat (1) 17.9% - 90.4% N/A - N/A 3.1% - 81.2% N/A - N/A 17.8% - 71.3% Contributes 41.1% 57.3% 73.1% 0.0% 50.6% Significantly (2) 9.6% - 82.1% 8.9% - 94.8% 18.8% - 96.9% N/A - N/A 23.1% - 77.8% Layoffs or Mean Score 0.50 0.00 1.04 0.00 0.61 furloughs (0-2) -0.05 - 1.05 0.00 - 0.00 0.36 - 1.72 0.00 - 0.00 0.26 - 0.97 Does Not 50.0% 100.0% 23.1% 100.0% 48.6% Contribute (0) 10.0% - 90.0% N/A - N/A 3.7% - 70.2% N/A - N/A 22.4% - 75.5% Contributes 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 41.5% Somewhat (1) 10.0% - 90.0% N/A - N/A 7.6% - 92.4% N/A - N/A 14.2% - 75.2% Contributes 0.0% 0.0% 26.9% 0.0% 10.0% Significantly (2) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.3% - 85.1% N/A - N/A 1.3% - 49.0% Reduced work Mean Score 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.83 hours of (0-2) 0.23 - 1.77 0.00 - 0.00 -0.25 - 2.25 0.00 - 0.00 0.22 - 1.44 current staff Does Not 25.0% 100.0% 50.0% 100.0% 47.1% Contribute (0) 2.6% - 80.7% N/A - N/A 7.6% - 92.4% N/A - N/A 19.1% - 77.0% Contributes 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 22.9% Somewhat (1) 10.1% - 89.9% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 6.7% - 55.2% Contributes 25.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 30.0% Significantly (2) 2.6% - 80.7% N/A - N/A 7.6% - 92.4% N/A - N/A 8.2% - 67.4% F-98 Table F.24 Page 1 of 3 ------- Table F.24. Question C.3: What factors contribute to personnel shortages you identified in questions C.l and C.2? (check all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Percentage Reporting by Population Served Factor Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Delayed or Mean Score 0.75 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.54 cancelled plans (0-2) -0.16 - 1.66 0.00 - 0.00 -0.54 - 1.62 0.00 - 0.00 -0.03 - 1.11 to hire staff Does Not 50.0% 100.0% 73.1% 100.0% 67.1% Contribute (0) 10.0% - 90.0% N/A - N/A 14.9% - 97.7% N/A - N/A 32.6% - 89.6% Contributes 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.5% Somewhat (1) 2.6% - 80.7% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.5% - 52.5% Contributes 25.0% 0.0% 26.9% 0.0% 21.4% Significantly (2) 2.6% - 80.7% N/A - N/A 2.3% - 85.1% N/A - N/A 4.6% - 60.6% Lack of backup Mean Score 1.00 1.00 1.27 0.00 1.01 certified (0-2) 0.36 - 1.64 1.00 - 1.00 0.43 - 2.11 0.00 - 0.00 0.56 - 1.47 personnel Does Not 20.5% 0.0% 23.1% 100.0% 26.0% Contribute (0) 2.2% - 74.5% N/A - N/A 3.3% - 72.4% N/A - N/A 8.5% - 57.1% Contributes 58.9% 100.0% 26.9% 0.0% 46.8% Somewhat (1) 17.0% - 91.0% N/A - N/A 3.1% - 81.2% N/A - N/A 19.5% - 76.1% Contributes 20.5% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 27.3% Significantly (2) 2.2% - 74.5% N/A - N/A 9.4% - 90.6% N/A - N/A 7.6% - 62.9% Operators unable Mean Score 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.08 to obtain or (0-2) 0.36 - 1.64 2.00 - 2.00 -0.13 - 2.13 1.00 - 1.00 0.56 - 1.60 maintain needed Does Not 20.5% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 27.3% certification due to Contribute (0) 2.2% - 74.5% N/A - N/A 9.4% - 90.6% N/A - N/A 7.6% - 62.9% lack of in-person Contributes 58.9% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 37.7% training Somewhat (1) 17.0% - 91.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 13.4% - 70.3% Contributes 20.5% 100.0% 50.0% 0.0% 35.0% Significantly (2) 2.2% - 74.5% N/A - N/A 9.4% - 90.6% N/A - N/A 12.1% - 67.9% F-99 Table F.24 Page 2 of 3 ------- Table F.24. Question C.3: What factors contribute to personnel shortages you identified in questions C.l and C.2? (check all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Percentage Reporting by Population Served Factor Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Restrictions on Mean Score 1.38 1.72 1.79 2.00 1.63 travel (0-2) 0.64 - 2.13 1.25 - 2.18 1.40 - 2.17 2.00 - 2.00 1.27 - 1.98 Does Not 20.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 8.1% Contribute (0) 2.4% - 72.7% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.1% - 40.6% Contributes 20.5% 28.5% 21.2% 0.0% 21.2% Somewhat (1) 2.4% - 72.7% 4.0% - 79.2% 2.7% - 72.7% N/A - N/A 6.3% - 51.8% Contributes 58.9% 71.5% 78.8% 100.0% 70.7% Significantly (2) 18.0% - 90.4% 20.8% - 96.0% 27.3% - 97.3% N/A - N/A 41.3% - 89.2% Lack of I.T. Mean Score 0.50 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 infrastructure (0-2) -0.05 - 1.05 2.00 - 2.00 -0.05 - 2.05 1.00 - 1.00 0.37 - 1.34 (e.g., equipment, Does Not 50.0% 0.0% 26.9% 0.0% 32.9% network capacity) Contribute (0) 10.0% - 90.0% N/A - N/A 2.3% - 85.1% N/A - N/A 10.4% - 67.4% Contributes 50.0% 0.0% 46.1% 100.0% 48.6% Somewhat (1) 10.0% - 90.0% N/A - N/A 23.0% - 71.0% N/A - N/A 22.4% - 75.5% Contributes 0.0% 100.0% 26.9% 0.0% 18.5% Significantly (2) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.3% - 85.1% N/A - N/A 4.2% - 54.1% Other Mean Score 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (0-2) 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Does Not 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Contribute (0) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Contributes 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Somewhat (1) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Contributes 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Significantly (2) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 5 3 5 1 14 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-100 Table F.24 Page 3 of 3 ------- Table F.25. Question C.4: What strategies or resources has your organization used to address potential shortages of certified operators, laboratory staff, or other trained personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Strategy or Resource Percentage Reporting by Population Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Used technology to allow some operational tasks to be performed remotely 35.4% 13.0% - 66.8% 40.8% 14.5% - 73.6% 35.0% 13.1% - 65.9% 46.1% 6.4% - 91.4% 37.5% 23.0% - 54.7% Used telework for job functions that could be performed remotely 48.3% 20.1% - 77.7% 26.5% 7.1% - 63.1% 0.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 30.4% 16.2% - 49.8% Decreased staffing/changed shift work while maintaining core operations 51.7% 22.3% - 79.9% 0.0% N/A - N/A 45.0% 18.6% - 74.5% 46.1% 6.4% - 91.4% 35.3% 20.1% - 54.3% Delayed non-critical work 51.7% 22.3% - 79.9% 32.7% 10.7% - 66.4% 46.7% 21.5% - 73.7% 46.1% 6.4% - 91.4% 44.6% 29.0% - 61.4% Increased use of contractors 24.2% 6.3% - 60.3% 0.0% N/A - N/A 10.0% 1.7% - 42.1% 0.0% N/A - N/A 11.4% 3.8% - 29.7% Accessed operators from nearby utilities, via WARN or other mutual aid networks 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 11.7% 1.8% - 49.3% 0.0% N/A - N/A 3.8% 0.6% - 20.9% Utilized backup laboratory services 12.9% 1.8% - 54.2% 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 4.4% 0.7% - 23.6% Other 12.9% 1.8% - 54.2% 14.3% 2.2% - 55.2% 21.7% 5.7% - 55.8% 0.0% N/A - N/A 15.2% 5.9% - 33.9% Observations 8 7 9 2 26 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-101 Table F.25 Page 1 of 1 ------- Table F.26. Question C.4.1: Did the strategies you implemented help mitigate staffing shortages? Alaska Native Village Utilities Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Strategy or Percentage Reporting by Population Served Resource Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Used technology (e.g., Strategy Did 0.0% 30.0% 0.0% 100.0% 17.4% live video feeds) to allow Not Help N/A - N/A 4.8% - 78.3% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 6.0% - 41.0% some operational tasks Strategy 68.2% 35.0% 66.7% 0.0% 52.2% to be performed Helped 17.7% - 95.5% 5.1% - 84.3% 16.2% - 95.4% N/A - N/A 25.4% - 77.8% remotely Not Sure 31.8% 35.0% 33.3% 0.0% 30.4% 4.5% - 82.3% 5.1% - 84.3% 4.6% - 83.8% N/A - N/A 10.8% - 61.1% Used telework for job Strategy Did 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% functions that could be Not Help N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A performed remotely Strategy 76.7% 100.0% 100.0% 87.5% Helped 28.2% - 96.5% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 48.7% - 98.1% Not Sure 23.3% 0.0% 0.0% 12.5% 3.5% - 71.8% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.9% - 51.3% Decreased staffing/ Strategy Did 50.0% 22.2% 0.0% 33.9% changed shift work Not Help 12.4% - 87.6% 3.8% - 67.5% N/A - N/A 12.0% - 65.9% while maintaining core Strategy 50.0% 51.9% 100.0% 55.4% operations Helped 12.4% - 87.6% 14.4% - 87.4% N/A - N/A 25.3% - 82.0% Not Sure 0.0% 25.9% 0.0% 10.8% N/A - N/A 3.8% - 75.7% N/A - N/A 1.7% - 45.6% Delayed non-critical Strategy Did 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% work Not Help N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Strategy 75.0% 50.0% 100.0% 100.0% 80.5% Helped 23.9% - 96.6% 5.9% - 94.1% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 48.8% - 94.7% Not Sure 25.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 19.5% 3.4% - 76.1% 5.9% - 94.1% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 5.3% - 51.2% F-102 Table F.26 Page 1 of 2 ------- Table F.26. Question C.4.1: Did the strategies you implemented help mitigate staffing shortages? Alaska Native Village Utilities Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Strategy or Resource Response Percentage Reporting by Population Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Increased use of contractors Strategy Did Not Help 0.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 28.5% 4.4% - 77.7% Strategy Helped 100.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 71.5% 22.3% - 95.6% Not Sure 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Accessed operators from nearby utilities, including via WARN or other mutual aid networks Strategy Did Not Help 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Strategy Helped 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A Not Sure 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Utilized backup laboratory services Strategy Did Not Help 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Strategy Helped 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A Not Sure 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other Strategy Did Not Help 0.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 46.1% 6.4% - 91.4% 46.4% 11.9% - 84.7% Strategy Helped 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 53.9% 8.6% - 93.6% 25.0% 3.7% - 74.2% Not Sure 100.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 28.7% 4.7% - 76.4% Observations 4 3 4 2 11 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-103 Table F.26 Page 2 of 2 ------- Table F.27. Question C.5: What is the greatest concern your organization has associated with maintaining staffing during the pandemic? (select one) Alaska Native Village Utilities Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Concern Percentage Reporting by Population Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Availability of testing for illness 37.1% 12.5% 18.2% 0.0% 21.0% 12.7% - 70.4% 2.0% - 50.4% 5.7% - 44.7% N/A - N/A 10.3% - 38.0% Availability of PPE 0.0% 34.4% 10.6% 0.0% 14.1% N/A - N/A 12.3% - 66.3% 1.6% - 45.7% N/A - N/A 5.7% - 30.8% Ability to house personnel on site 11.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.4% 1.9% - 45.6% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 0.5% - 18.8% Cross-training personnel 0.0% 12.5% 0.0% 0.0% 3.9% N/A - N/A 2.0% - 50.4% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 0.6% - 21.1% Protecting high-risk employees 38.7% 18.7% 19.7% 46.1% 26.8% 13.9% - 71.3% 6.2% - 44.5% 5.3% - 51.8% 6.7% - 91.1% 15.1% - 43.0% Adhering to changing local and state 12.9% 10.9% 42.5% 53.9% 24.4% 1.9% - 53.3% 1.7% - 46.4% 20.0% - 68.5% 8.9% - 93.3% 13.4% - 40.2% Other 0.0% 10.9% 9.1% 0.0% 6.3% N/A - N/A 1.7% - 46.4% 1.6% - 38.6% N/A - N/A 1.7% - 20.5% Observations 8 9 10 2 29 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-104 Table F.27 Page 1 of 1 ------- Table F.28. Question Dl.1.2: Please indicate the state of your organization's operating budget from January 2020 to the present Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Parameter Average Operating Budget by Population Served (Dollars) < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Budgeted Revenue $22,547 $18,476 - $26,617 $195,381 $142,517 - $248,245 $183,638 $181,346 - $185,929 $149,598 $120,515 - $178,682 Actual Revenue $16,716 $8,332 - $25,100 $137,697 $123,170 - $152,224 $122,786 $118,100 - $127,471 $101,937 $76,212 - $127,662 Budgeted Expenses $51,035 $17,084 - $84,985 $196,448 $141,529 - $251,367 $183,638 $181,346 - $185,929 $156,303 $131,772 - $180,834 Actual Expenses $56,389 $10,821 - $101,957 $148,751 $123,353 - $174,149 $122,786 $118,100 - $127,471 $113,359 $94,420 - $132,297 Observations 2 3 2 7 F-105 Table F.28 Page 1 of 1 ------- Table F.29. Average Budgeted and Actual Net Revenue (Calculated) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Average Net Revenue by Population Served (Dollars) Parameter < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Budgeted Net -$28,488 -$1,067 $0 -$6,705 Revenue -$58,369 - $1,393 -$3,482 - $1,348 N/A - N/A -$15,947 - $2,538 Actual Net -$39,673 -$11,054 $0 -$11,422 Revenue -$93,625 - $14,279 -$30,163 - $8,055 N/A - N/A -$27,460 - $4,616 Observations 2 3 2 7 F-106 Table F.29 Page 1 of 1 ------- Table F.30. Percentage of Utilities with a Deficit/Loss, and Total Deficit/Loss at Those Utilities (Calculated) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Parameter Utility Deficits by Population Served (Dollars in Millions) < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Percentage of Utilities with Deficit/Loss 100% N/A - N/A 48% 10% - 89% 0% N/A - N/A 33% 14% - 59% Total Deficit/Loss (Utilities with Deficit/Loss) $1.6 -$1.0 -$4.2 $0.6 $0.4 -$0.7 $2.2 -$0.4 -$4.8 Observations 2 3 2 7 F-107 Table F.30 Page 1 of 1 ------- Table F.31. Average Difference between Actual and Budgeted Net Revenue, Percentage of Utilities with a Shortfall, and Total Shortfall at Those Utilities (Calculated) Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Parameter Difference between Actual and Budgeted Net Revenue by Population Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Average Difference in Net Revenue (Actual Minus Budgeted Net Revenue) -$11,185 -$35,256 - $12,886 -$9,987 -$27,388 - $7,414 $0 N/A - N/A -$4,717 -$11,805 - $2,371 Percentage of Utilities with Shortfall 50% 3% - 97% 48% 10% - 89% 0% N/A - N/A 22% 6% - 53% Total Shortfall in Utilities with Shortfall (Millions of Dollars) $0.5 $0.5 - $0.5 $0.5 $0.4 - $0.6 $0.0 N/A - N/A $1.0 $1.0 - $1.1 Observations 2 3 2 7 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-108 Table F.31 Page 1 of 1 ------- Table F.32. Question D.1.2: Your answers indicate that actual operating revenue was lower than budgeted during the January to present period. What COVID-19-related factors contributed to this? Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Percentage Reporting by Population Served Factor Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Nonpayment Mean Score 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 of bills (Oto 2) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A -0.18 - 0.57 Not a Contributor 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 80.4% (0) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 27.0% - 97.9% Contributor (1) 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 19.6% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.1% - 73.0% Significant 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Contributor (2) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Do Not Know 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Decreased use Mean Score 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 (Oto 2) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A -0.18 - 0.57 Not a Contributor 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 80.4% (0) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 27.0% - 97.9% Contributor (1) 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 19.6% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.1% - 73.0% Significant 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Contributor (2) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Do Not Know 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A F-109 Table F.32 Page 1 of 2 ------- Table F.32. Question D.1.2: Your answers indicate that actual operating revenue was lower than budgeted during the January to present period. What COVID-19-related factors contributed to this? Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Percentage Reporting by Population Served Factor Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Reduction in Mean Score 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 rates/fees (Oto 2) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Not a Contributor 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (0) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Contributor (1) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Significant 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Contributor (2) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Do Not Know 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 1 3 2 6 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-110 Table F.32 Page 2 of 2 ------- Table F.33. Question D.1.3: Your answers indicate that actual operating expenses were higher than budgeted during the January to present period. What COVID-19-related factors contributed? Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Factor Response Percentage Reporting by Popu ation Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Personnel Costs Mean Score (Oto 2) 0.00 N/A - N/A 0.00 N/A - N/A Not a Contributor (0) 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A Contributor (1) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Significant Contributor (2) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Do Not Know 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Consumables Mean Score (Oto 2) 0.00 N/A - N/A 0.00 N/A - N/A Not a Contributor (0) 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A Contributor (1) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Significant Contributor (2) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Do Not Know 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A F-lll Table F.33 Page 1 of 2 ------- Table F.33. Question D.1.3: Your answers indicate that actual operating expenses were higher than budgeted during the January to present period. What COVID-19-related factors contributed? Alaska Native Village Utilities January to the Present Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Factor Response Percentage Reporting by Popu ation Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Utilities Costs Mean Score (Oto 2) 1.00 N/A - N/A 1.00 N/A - N/A Not a Contributor (0) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Contributor (1) 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A Significant Contributor (2) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Do Not Know 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A PPE Mean Score (Oto 2) 1.00 N/A - N/A 1.00 N/A - N/A Not a Contributor (0) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Contributor (1) 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A Significant Contributor (2) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Do Not Know 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 1 1 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-112 Table F.33 Page 2 of 2 ------- Table F.34. Question D.2.1: Do you expect your financial situation for the remainder of the year to improve, to worsen, or to stay about the same, compared with the January to present timeframe? Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Value Percentage Reporting by Population Served Type Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Operating Mean Score (0 to 2) 1.00 1.37 1.12 2.00 1.21 Revenue N/A - N/A 1.03 - 1.70 0.78 - 1.46 N/A - N/A 1.02 - 1.40 Improve (0) 0.0% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 3.2% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.7% - 42.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.6% - 16.8% Stay About the Same 70.9% 63.2% 68.4% 0.0% 62.7% (1) 33.0% - 92.3% 29.6% - 87.5% 37.6% - 88.5% 0.0% - 0.0% 44.4% - 78.0% Worsen (2) 0.0% 36.8% 21.7% 46.1% 21.6% N/A - N/A 12.5% - 70.4% 5.6% - 56.1% 6.4% - 91.5% 10.6% - 39.1% Do Not Know 29.1% 0.0% 0.0% 53.9% 12.5% 7.7% - 67.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 8.5% - 93.6% 4.3% - 30.9% Operating Mean Score (0 to 2) 1.00 1.37 1.22 1.00 1.22 Expenses N/A - N/A 1.03 - 1.70 0.95 - 1.48 N/A - N/A 1.05 - 1.39 Improve (0) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Stay About the Same 58.2% 63.2% 78.3% 46.1% 65.4% (1) 24.7% - 85.5% 29.6% - 87.5% 43.9% - 94.4% 6.4% - 91.5% 46.0% - 80.7% Worsen (2) 0.0% 36.8% 21.7% 0.0% 18.4% N/A - N/A 12.5% - 70.4% 5.6% - 56.1% N/A - N/A 8.1% - 36.6% Do Not Know 41.8% 0.0% 0.0% 53.9% 16.2% 14.5% - 75.3% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 8.5% - 93.6% 6.5% - 35.1% Observations 7 8 9 2 26 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-113 Table F.34 Page 1 of 1 ------- Table F.35. Question D.2.2: To what COVID-19-related factors do you attribute the worsening outlook for operating revenue in the remainder of 2020? Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Percentage Reporting by Population Served Factor Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Nonpayment Mean Score (0 to 2) 1.62 1.00 1.00 1.32 of bills 1.30 - 1.94 N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 0.88 - 1.77 Not a Contributor (0) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Contributor (1) 38.2% 100.0% 100.0% 67.5% 13.7% - 70.7% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 21.7% - 94.0% Significant Contributor 61.8% 0.0% 0.0% 32.5% (2) 29.3% - 86.3% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 6.0% - 78.3% Do Not Know 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Decreased use Mean Score (0 to 2) 1.05 0.54 0.00 0.73 0.37 - 1.73 -0.13 - 1.21 N/A - N/A 0.28 - 1.17 Not a Contributor (0) 33.3% 46.1% 100.0% 47.4% 5.7% - 80.5% 5.4% - 92.7% N/A - N/A 13.3% - 84.1% Contributor (1) 28.5% 53.9% 0.0% 32.5% 4.8% - 76.1% 7.3% - 94.6% N/A - N/A 6.0% - 78.3% Significant Contributor 38.2% 0.0% 0.0% 20.1% (2) 13.7% - 70.7% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 20.1% - 20.1% Do Not Know 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A F-114 Table F.35 Page 1 of 2 ------- Table F.35. Question D.2.2: To what COVID-19-related factors do you attribute the worsening outlook for operating revenue in the remainder of 2020? Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Percentage Reporting by Population Served Factor Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Reduction in Mean Score (0 to 2) 0.76 1.00 0.00 0.73 rates/fees 0.12 - 1.41 N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 0.28 - 1.17 Not a Contributor (0) 61.8% 0.0% 100.0% 47.4% 29.3% - 86.3% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 13.3% - 84.1% Contributor (1) 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 32.5% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 6.0% - 78.3% Significant Contributor 38.2% 0.0% 0.0% 20.1% (2) 13.7% - 70.7% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Do Not Know 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 3 2 1 6 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-115 Table F.35 Page 2 of 2 ------- Table F.36. Question D.2.3: To what COVID-19-related factors do you attribute the worsening outlook for operating expenses in the remainder of 2020? Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Factor Response Percentage Reporting by Population Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Personnel Costs Mean Score (0 to 2) 1.33 0.39 - 2.28 1.46 0.78 - 2.14 1.38 0.98 - 1.79 Not a Contributor (0) 33.3% 5.6% - 80.7% 0.0% N/A - N/A 20.6% 2.1% - 75.4% Contributor (1) 0.0% N/A - N/A 53.9% 7.0% - 94.8% 20.6% 2.1% - 75.4% Significant Contributor (2) 66.7% 19.3% - 94.4% 46.1% 5.2% - 93.0% 58.8% N/A - N/A Do Not Know 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Consumables Mean Score (0 to 2) 1.62 1.29 - 1.94 1.46 0.78 - 2.14 1.56 1.15 - 1.96 Not a Contributor (0) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Contributor (1) 38.2% 13.5% - 71.0% 53.9% 7.0% - 94.8% 44.2% 13.4% - 80.3% Significant Contributor (2) 61.8% 29.0% - 86.5% 46.1% 5.2% - 93.0% 55.8% 19.7% - 86.6% Do Not Know 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A F-116 Table F.36 Page 1 of 2 ------- Table F.36. Question D.2.3: To what COVID-19-related factors do you attribute the worsening outlook for operating expenses in the remainder of 2020? Alaska Native Village Utilities Present to December Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Factor Response Percentage Reporting by Population Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Utilities Costs Mean Score (0 to 2) 2.00 N/A - N/A 1.46 0.78 - 2.14 1.79 1.39 - 2.20 Not a Contributor (0) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Contributor (1) 0.0% N/A - N/A 53.9% 7.0% - 94.8% 20.6% 2.1% - 75.4% Significant Contributor (2) 100.0% N/A - N/A 46.1% 5.2% - 93.0% 79.4% 24.6% - 97.9% Do Not Know 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A PPE Mean Score (0 to 2) 1.43 0.57 - 2.29 1.46 0.78 - 2.14 1.44 0.66 - 2.23 Not a Contributor (0) 28.5% 4.6% - 76.8% 0.0% N/A - N/A 17.6% 2.1% - 68.5% Contributor (1) 0.0% N/A - N/A 53.9% 7.0% - 94.8% 20.6% 2.1% - 75.4% Significant Contributor (2) 71.5% 23.2% - 95.4% 46.1% 5.2% - 93.0% 61.8% 14.9% - 93.7% Do Not Know 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 3 2 5 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-117 Table F.36 Page 2 of 2 ------- Table F.37. Question D.3.1: If your organization has experienced or anticipates a decrease in cash flow due to COVID-19, what mitigating actions are you taking or planning? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Response Percentage Reporting by Population Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Drawing down days cash 0.0% 14.1% 26.4% 0.0% 13.5% on hand N/A - N/A 2.1% - 55.0% 7.2% - 62.6% N/A - N/A 4.5% - 33.9% Drawing on reserve funds 34.1% 26.3% 24.5% 100.0% 30.7% 8.8% - 73.5% 6.8% - 63.5% 6.2% - 61.4% N/A - N/A 15.5% - 51.6% Delaying maintenance 17.0% 63.2% 37.7% 0.0% 39.3% 2.4% - 63.5% 29.1% - 87.8% 12.7% - 71.7% N/A - N/A 21.9% - 59.9% Reducing statt hours 17.0% 21.0% 51.0% 0.0% 28.8% 2.4% - 63.5% 6.9% - 48.7% 21.0% - 80.2% N/A - N/A 14.9% - 48.4% Reducing staff pay and/or 0.0% 10.5% 0.0% 0.0% 3.7% benefits N/A - N/A 1.8% - 43.4% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 0.6% - 18.8% Laying oft statt 0.0% 0.0% 24.5% 0.0% 8.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 6.2% - 61.4% N/A - N/A 2.1% - 25.9% Incurring additional debt 14.8% 24.6% 13.2% 0.0% 17.2% 2.5% - 54.7% 6.5% - 60.4% 1.9% - 54.7% N/A - N/A 6.6% - 37.8% Refinancing debt and/or 0.0% 14.1% 26.4% 0.0% 13.5% deferring debt payments N/A - N/A 2.1% - 55.0% 7.2% - 62.6% N/A - N/A 4.5% - 33.9% Delaying/canceling capital 17.0% 36.8% 22.6% 100.0% 28.8% improvement projects 2.4% - 63.5% 12.2% - 70.9% 7.3% - 51.9% N/A - N/A 15.4% - 47.3% Adjusting rates higher than 34.1% 35.1% 0.0% 0.0% 22.1% originally planned 8.8% - 73.5% 12.8% - 66.4% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 10.4% - 41.0% Not applicable (no 17.0% 12.3% 11.3% 0.0% 12.9% decrease in cash flow) 2.4% - 63.5% 1.8% - 51.3% 1.9% - 46.0% N/A - N/A 4.2% - 33.2% Observations 6 8 8 1 23 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculatec F-118 Table F.37 Page 1 fo 1 ------- Table F.38. Question D.3.2: What type of impact do you think these actions are making or will make in mitigating the decrease in your organization's cash flow? Alaska Native Village Utilities Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Action Response Percentage Reporting by Popu ation Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Drawing down Mean Score (1 to 2.00 2.00 days cash 2) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A on hand Small Impact (1) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Large Impact (2) 0.0% N/A - N/A 50.0% 2.0% - 98.0% 31.8% 2.6% - 89.1% Do Not Know 100.0% N/A - N/A 50.0% 2.0% - 98.0% 68.2% 10.9% - 97.4% Observations 1 2 3 Drawing on Mean Score (1 to 1.50 1.47 1.00 1.41 reserve funds 2) 0.67 - 2.33 0.99 - 1.94 N/A - N/A 0.99 - 1.82 Small Impact (1) 50.0% 53.4% 46.1% 0.0% 44.0% 3.5% - 96.5% 7.0% - 94.6% 5.4% - 92.8% 0.0% - 0.0% 14.3% - 78.7% Large Impact (2) 50.0% 46.6% 0.0% 0.0% 30.0% 3.5% - 96.5% 5.4% - 93.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% - 0.0% 5.7% - 75.1% Do Not Know 0.0% 0.0% 53.9% 100.0% 25.9% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 7.2% - 94.6% 0.0% - 0.0% 5.3% - 68.8% Observations 2 2 2 1 7 Delaying Mean Score (1 to 2.00 1.78 1.35 1.67 maintenance 2) N/A - N/A 1.37 - 2.18 0.75 - 1.95 1.31 - 2.04 Small Impact (1) 0.0% 22.3% 65.0% 32.8% N/A - N/A 2.7% - 75.0% 11.9% - 96.2% 8.5% - 71.9% Large Impact (2) 100.0% 77.7% 35.0% 67.2% N/A - N/A 25.0% - 97.3% 3.8% - 88.1% 28.1% - 91.5% Do Not Know 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 1 5 3 9 F-119 Table F.38 Page 1 of 4 ------- Table F.38. Question D.3.2: What type of impact do you think these actions are making or will make in mitigating the decrease in your organization's cash flow? Alaska Native Village Utilities Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Action Response Percentage Reporting by Popu ation Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Reducing staff hours Mean Score (1 to 2) 2.00 N/A - N/A 1.00 N/A - N/A 1.33 0.68 - 1.99 1.37 1.03 - 1.70 Small Impact (1) 0.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 51.9% 10.6% - 90.8% 55.3% 21.2% - 85.0% Large Impact (2) 100.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 25.9% 2.3% - 83.9% 32.0% 11.0% - 64.2% Do Not Know 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 22.2% 4.2% - 65.1% 12.7% 1.7% - 55.7% Observations 1 2 4 7 Reducing staff pay and/or benefits Mean Score (1 to 2) 1.00 N/A - N/A 1.00 N/A - N/A Small Impact (1) 100.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A Large Impact (2) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Do Not Know 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Observations 1 1 Laying off staff Mean Score (1 to 2) 2.00 N/A - N/A 2.00 N/A - N/A Small Impact (1) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Large Impact (2) 53.9% 53.9% - 53.9% 53.9% 53.9% - 53.9% Do Not Know 46.1% 46.1% - 46.1% 46.1% 46.1% - 46.1% Observations 2 2 F-120 Table F.38 Page 2 of 4 ------- Table F.38. Question D.3.2: What type of impact do you think these actions are making or will make in mitigating the decrease in your organization's cash flow? Alaska Native Village Utilities Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Action Response Percentage Reporting by Popu ation Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Incurring Mean Score (1 to 2.00 2.00 2.00 additional debt 2) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Small Impact (1) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Large Impact (2) 0.0% 42.7% 100.0% 46.4% N/A - N/A 42.7% - 42.7% N/A - N/A 10.6% - 86.3% Do Not Know 100.0% 57.3% 0.0% 53.6% N/A - N/A 57.3% - 57.3% N/A - N/A 13.7% - 89.4% Observations 1 2 1 4 Refinancing debt Mean Score (1 to 2.00 2.00 and/or 2) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A deferring debt Small Impact (1) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% payments N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Large Impact (2) 0.0% N/A - N/A 50.0% 1.8% - 98.2% 31.8% 2.5% - 89.6% Do Not Know 100.0% N/A - N/A 50.0% 1.8% - 98.2% 68.2% 10.4% - 97.5% Observations 1 2 3 Delaying/ Mean Score (1 to 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.62 canceling capital 2) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.39 - 1.85 improvement Small Impact (1) 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 38.2% projects N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 18.8% - 62.3% Large Impact (2) 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 61.8% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 37.7% - 81.2% Do Not Know 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Observations 1 3 2 1 7 F-121 Table F.38 Page 3 of 4 ------- Table F.38. Question D.3.2: What type of impact do you think these actions are making or will make in mitigating the decrease in your organization's cash flow? Alaska Native Village Utilities Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Action Response Percentage Reporting by Popu ation Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Adjusting rates Mean Score (1 to 1.00 1.00 1.00 higher than 2) N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A originally Small Impact (1) 100.0% 59.9% 77.7% planned N/A - N/A 17.7% - 91.2% 22.4% - 97.7% Large Impact (2) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Do Not Know 0.0% N/A - N/A 40.1% 8.8% - 82.3% 22.3% 2.3% - 77.6% Observations 2 3 5 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-122 Table F.38 Page 4 of 4 ------- Table F.39. Question D.4: Which of the following is your organization considering regarding capital infrastructure projects due to COVID-19? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Changes Percentage Reporting by Population Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Not applicable (no projects planned) 14.6% 2.1% - 57.5% 40.4% 14.9% - 72.4% 26.4% 7.3% - 62.2% 0.0% N/A - N/A 25.3% 12.4% - 44.8% No changes to current or planned projects 29.1% 7.6% - 67.1% 0.0% N/A - N/A 37.7% 12.8% - 71.4% 0.0% N/A - N/A 20.2% 8.8% - 40.1% Pausing/slowing a project for which construction has begun 0.0% N/A - N/A 33.3% 12.4% - 63.7% 11.3% 1.9% - 46.1% 46.1% 6.3% - 91.5% 17.4% 9.3% - 30.2% Delaying starting a project 14.6% 2.1% - 57.5% 0.0% N/A - N/A 22.6% 7.3% - 52.1% 46.1% 6.3% - 91.5% 14.6% 6.4% - 29.8% Accelerating starting a project 12.7% 2.1% - 49.4% 0.0% N/A - N/A 13.2% 1.9% - 54.1% 0.0% N/A - N/A 7.9% 2.2% - 24.5% Reducing the scope or funding for a project for which construction has begun 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Increasing the scope or funding for a project (current or planned) 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Delaying applying for a subsidized loan/grant by at least six months 0.0% N/A - N/A 14.1% 2.2% - 54.4% 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 4.5% 0.7% - 23.9% Accelerating interest in applying for a subsidized loan/grant for a shovel-ready project 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Other 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A Do not know 29.1% 7.6% - 67.1% 12.3% 1.9% - 50.9% 0.0% N/A - N/A 53.9% 8.5% - 93.7% 16.9% 6.7% - 36.3% Observations 7 8 8 2 25 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-123 Table F.39 Page 1 of 1 ------- Table F.40. Question D.5: In response to COVID-19, what actions has your organization taken to help alleviate economic impacts on customers? (select all that apply) Alaska Native Village Utilities Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Actions Percentage Reporting by Population Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Suspended service 27.2% 26.3% 55.0% 46.1% 37.3% shutoffs 7.3% - 64.1% 7.0% - 62.9% 25.3% - 81.5% 6.4% - 91.5% 21.9% - 55.8% Waived late payment fees 29.1% 26.3% 31.6% 46.1% 30.3% 7.7% - 67.0% 7.0% - 62.9% 11.5% - 62.4% 6.4% - 91.5% 16.4% - 49.0% Provided extensions on 0.0% 36.8% 43.3% 46.1% 28.6% bill payment N/A - N/A 12.5% - 70.4% 17.8% - 73.0% 6.4% - 91.5% 16.1% - 45.6% Expanded customer 27.2% 12.3% 78.3% 0.0% 37.3% assistance programs 7.3% - 64.1% 1.9% - 50.5% 43.9% - 94.4% N/A - N/A 23.3% - 53.8% Expanded water 27.2% 0.0% 43.3% 0.0% 22.1% conservation programs 7.3% - 64.1% N/A - N/A 17.8% - 73.0% N/A - N/A 10.6% - 40.6% Delayed or eliminated 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 46.1% 3.2% planned rate adjustment N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 6.4% - 91.5% 0.6% - 16.8% Lowered rates 14.6% 14.1% 0.0% 0.0% 8.7% 2.1% - 57.5% 2.2% - 54.4% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.5% - 26.1% Other 14.6% 14.1% 10.0% 0.0% 11.9% 2.1% - 57.5% 2.2% - 54.4% 1.7% - 42.0% N/A - N/A 4.2% - 29.4% None (no actions taken) 14.6% 10.5% 0.0% 0.0% 7.6% 2.1% - 57.5% 1.8% - 43.5% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.0% - 24.6% Do not know 29.1% 12.3% 0.0% 53.9% 16.2% 7.7% - 67.0% 1.9% - 50.5% N/A - N/A 8.5% - 93.6% 6.5% - 35.1% Observations 7 8 9 2 26 N/A: confidence interval cou d not be calculated. F-124 Table F.40 Page 1 of 1 ------- Table F.41. Question El: What COVID-19-related conditions have interfered with your organization's ability to complete the required sampling needed to operate your system and to determine compliance with regulations? Alaska Native Village Utilities Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Percentage Reporting by Population Served Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Lack of available personnel 25.8% 14.1% 0.0% 0.0% 12.5% for sample collection 6.9% - 62.1% 2.2% - 54.4% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 4.8% - 28.7% Lack of available supplies 12.9% 26.3% 11.7% 46.1% 18.8% for sampling and/or shipping 1.9% - 53.3% 7.1% - 62.7% 1.8% - 49.3% 6.4% - 91.4% 8.2% - 37.4% Lack of available personal 12.9% 12.3% 11.7% 0.0% 11.5% protective equipment 1.9% - 53.3% 1.9% - 50.1% 1.8% - 49.3% N/A - N/A 3.9% - 29.1% Lack of access to approved 0.0% 14.1% 0.0% 0.0% 4.2% monitoring locations N/A - N/A 2.2% - 54.4% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 0.7% - 22.4% Other 0.0% 0.0% 23.3% 0.0% 7.3% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 6.5% - 57.3% N/A - N/A 2.0% - 22.9% None 25.8% 61.4% 43.3% 53.9% 43.7% 6.9% - 62.1% 29.1% - 86.1% 17.9% - 72.8% 8.6% - 93.6% 27.3% - 61.6% Do not know 35.4% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 14.6% 13.1% - 66.7% N/A - N/A 1.7% - 42.1% N/A - N/A 5.7% - 32.5% Observations 8 8 9 2 27 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-125 Table F.41 Page 1 of 1 ------- Table F.42. Question E2: What COVID-19-related conditions have interfered with your organization's ability to complete required laboratory analyses needed to operate your system and to determine compliance with regulations? Alaska Native Village Utilities Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Percentage Reporting by Population Served Response < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Lack of available laboratory 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% personnel N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Lack of available supplies for 0.0% 10.5% 11.7% 0.0% 6.8% sampling and/or shipping N/A - N/A 1.8% - 43.5% 1.8% - 49.3% N/A - N/A 1.8% - 22.0% Lack of available personal 0.0% 12.3% 11.7% 0.0% 7.3% protective equipment N/A - N/A 1.9% - 50.1% 1.8% - 49.3% N/A - N/A 2.0% - 22.9% Internal laboratory capacity 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% shortages that delay timely analysis N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Decreased access to external 0.0% 0.0% 11.7% 46.1% 6.8% laboratory services N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.8% - 49.3% 6.4% - 91.4% 1.8% - 22.0% Delays in external laboratory 0.0% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 3.1% services N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.7% - 42.1% N/A - N/A 0.5% - 16.2% Sample transport delays 51.7% 36.8% 21.7% 0.0% 34.4% 22.6% - 79.7% 12.5% - 70.3% 5.7% - 55.8% N/A - N/A 20.2% - 52.1% Travel restrictions 25.8% 26.3% 20.0% 46.1% 25.5% 6.9% - 62.1% 7.1% - 62.7% 6.5% - 47.3% 6.4% - 91.4% 13.5% - 43.0% Revenue interruption 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 46.1% 3.1% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 6.4% - 91.4% 0.5% - 16.2% None 25.8% 50.9% 45.0% 53.9% 41.2% 6.9% - 62.1% 21.3% - 79.9% 18.6% - 74.5% 8.6% - 93.6% 24.8% - 59.7% Do not know 22.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.3% 7.3% - 51.9% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 2.0% - 22.9% Observations 8 8 9 2 27 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-126 Table F.42 Page 1 of 1 ------- Table F.43. Question Fl: Has your organization experienced any issues or concerns related to cybersecurity during the pandemic? (Yes/No) Alaska Native Village Utilities Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Response Percentage Reporting by Population Served < 101 101 - 500 501 - 3,300 3,301 - 10,000 All Percentage of Systems with Cybersecurity Concerns 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% Observations 8 8 9 2 27 F-127 Table F.43 Page 1 of 1 ------- Table F.44. Gl. Looking ahead to the next several months, please indicate your level of concern about topics covered in this survey. Alaska Native Village Utilities Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Topics of Concern Response Percentage Reporting by Population Served < 101 > 10,000 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Supply Chain Mean Score 0.87 0.44 - 1.30 0.86 0.29 - 1.42 1.00 0.48 - 1.52 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 0.95 0.66 - 1.24 No Concern 25.8% 6.7% - 62.6% 40.8% 14.5% - 73.6% 33.3% 11.5% - 65.9% 0.0% N/A - N/A 30.4% 16.2% - 49.8% Mild Concern 61.3% 28.3% - 86.4% 32.7% 10.7% - 66.4% 33.3% 11.5% - 65.9% 0.0% N/A - N/A 40.3% 24.5% - 58.3% Serious Concern 12.9% 1.8% - 54.2% 26.5% 7.1% - 63.1% 33.3% 11.5% - 65.9% 46.1% 6.4% - 91.4% 25.5% 13.2% - 43.6% Do Not Know 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 53.9% 8.6% - 93.6% 3.8% 0.6% - 20.9% Observations 8 7 9 2 26 Workforce Mean Score 0.87 0.32 - 1.42 0.63 0.13 - 1.13 0.78 0.29 - 1.27 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 0.77 0.48 - 1.06 No Concern 38.7% 13.9% - 71.3% 50.9% 21.3% - 79.9% 43.3% 17.9% - 72.8% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 41.2% 25.4% - 59.0% Mild Concern 35.4% 13.1% - 66.7% 35.0% 12.8% - 66.5% 35.0% 13.1% - 65.9% 46.1% 6.4% - 91.4% 35.9% 22.1% - 52.5% Serious Concern 25.8% 6.9% - 62.1% 14.1% 2.2% - 54.4% 21.7% 5.7% - 55.8% 0.0% N/A - N/A 19.3% 8.7% - 37.3% Do Not Know 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 53.9% 8.6% - 93.6% 3.6% 0.6% - 20.1% Observations 8 8 9 2 27 F-128 Table F.44 Page 1 of 3 ------- Table F.44. Gl. Looking ahead to the next several months, please indicate your level of concern about topics covered in this survey. Alaska Native Village Utilities Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Topics of Concern Response Percentage Reporting by Population Served < 101 > 10,000 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Financial Mean Score 0.83 0.27 - 1.39 0.88 0.35 - 1.40 0.98 0.39 - 1.58 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 0.91 0.59 - 1.22 No Concern 25.8% 6.9% - 62.1% 36.8% 12.5% - 70.3% 45.0% 18.6% - 74.5% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 33.3% 18.6% - 52.3% Mild Concern 37.1% 12.7% - 70.5% 38.6% 13.9% - 70.9% 11.7% 1.8% - 49.3% 46.1% 6.4% - 91.4% 30.2% 16.2% - 49.2% Serious Concern 12.9% 1.9% - 53.3% 24.6% 6.6% - 60.1% 43.3% 17.9% - 72.8% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 25.0% 12.8% - 42.9% Do Not Know 24.2% 6.4% - 59.9% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 53.9% 8.6% - 93.6% 11.5% 3.9% - 29.1% Observations 8 8 9 2 27 Analytical Support Mean Score 0.66 0.28 - 1.04 0.51 -0.01 - 1.03 0.80 0.30 - 1.30 0.66 0.38 - 0.94 No Concern 25.8% 6.9% - 62.1% 63.2% 29.7% - 87.5% 43.3% 17.9% - 72.8% 0.0% N/A - N/A 40.6% 24.5% - 59.1% Mild Concern 50.0% 20.4% - 79.6% 22.8% 6.2% - 56.9% 33.3% 11.5% - 65.9% 0.0% N/A - N/A 33.3% 18.6% - 52.3% Serious Concern 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 14.1% 2.2% - 54.4% 23.3% 6.5% - 57.3% 0.0% N/A - N/A 11.5% 3.9% - 29.1% Do Not Know 24.2% 6.4% - 59.9% 0.0% N/A - N/A 0.0% N/A - N/A 100.0% N/A - N/A 14.6% 5.7% - 32.5% Observations 8 8 9 2 27 F-129 Table F.44 Page 2 of 3 ------- Table F.44. Gl. Looking ahead to the next several months, please indicate your level of concern about topics covered in this survey. Alaska Native Village Utilities Estimates and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals Topics of Percentage Reporting by Population Served Concern Response < 101 > 10,000 501 - 3,300 3,301 -10,000 All Cybersecurity Mean Score 0.15 0.14 0.57 0.00 0.28 -0.11 - 0.40 -0.10 - 0.38 0.12 - 1.02 N/A - N/A 0.08 - 0.48 No Concern 75.8% 85.9% 55.0% 46.1% 70.3% 40.1% - 93.6% 45.6% - 97.8% 25.5% - 81.4% 6.4% - 91.4% 51.9% - 83.9% Mild Concern 12.9% 14.1% 33.3% 0.0% 18.8% 1.9% - 53.3% 2.2% - 54.4% 11.5% - 65.9% N/A - N/A 8.2% - 37.4% Serious Concer 0.0% 0.0% 11.7% 0.0% 3.6% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1.8% - 49.3% N/A - N/A 0.6% - 20.1% Do Not Know 11.3% 0.0% 0.0% 53.9% 7.3% 1.9% - 46.0% N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 8.6% - 93.6% 2.0% - 22.9% Observations 8 8 9 2 27 N/A: confidence interval could not be calculated. F-130 Table F.44 Page 3 of 3 ------- |