Land Division
RCRA Facilities Management Office • March 2015
75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA S4105
866-EPA-WEST • www.epa.gov/region9
v»EPA
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Pacific Southwest/Region 9
Serving Arizona, California, HaiMii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands and 148 Tribes
National Historic Preservation
Act Determination at
Evoqua Water Technologies
Introduction
U.S. EPA is in the process of reviewing an application
for a hazardous waste Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCR A) permit relating to the Evoqua
Water Technologies facility in Parker, Arizona. As
part of that review, EPA has conducted a number of
studies considering various possible impacts of the
facility on the surrounding community. One ot these
is a National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA)
review, in which EPA assesses potential impacts of
the permit decision on historic and/or culturally
significant properties. Please see EPA's general fact
sheet for discussion of other studies done as part of
this permit process. The public will have the oppor-
tunity to see and comment on EPA's proposed permit
decision before a final permit decision is made.
This fact sheet summarizes EPA's NHPA review.
Please note that due to several changes of ownership
for this facility, older documents may reflect previous
facility names including Siemens Industries, Inc.,
U.S. Filter, and Westates.
Permit Background
Evoqua Water Technologies operates a spent carbon
storage and treatment facility on the CRIT reserva-
tion, near Parker, Arizona. There, spent carbon is
treated in a regeneration furnace to purify it and turn
it into a reusable filter material. EPA is responsible
under RCRA law to permit facilities that manage
regulated wastes on tribal lands. The Evoqua facili-
ty has been operating under RCRA "interim status"
classification while EPA reviews the facility's RCR A
permit application. It is important to note that both
the interim status and permit regulations require

Evoqua Facility in Parker, AZ
that the facility be operated safely, so as to protect
human health and the environment.
Overview of the NHPA Process
US EPA conducted a review of potential impacts to
historic properties in accordance with Section 106 of
the NHPA. As part of the NHPA review, U.S. EPA
carried out the following steps:
•	Initiated formal consultation with CRIT, the
Arizona State Historic Preservation Office, the
Town of Parker, and the facility;
•	Designated a one-mile radius area of potential
effect (APE);
•	Sought public comment on the APE and with
identifying historic or culturally significant
properties;
•	Searched for historic or culturally significant tribal
properties within the APE; and
•	Evaluated potential effects of the permit decision
on those properties.
U.S. EPA made a final determination that the permit
decision will have no adverse effect on historic prop-
erties. A more detailed report documenting the steps
taken in making this finding was sent to the consult-
ing parties listed above.

-------
Search for Historic Properties
KP \ searched for historic properties within the \PI.
by conducting the following activities:
•	Reviewing historical records with assistance
from the CRlT Museum Director and Attorney
General's office;
•	Reviewing site archaeological walkover records;
•	Reaching out to the public via public notice; and
•	Searching national and state databases for
historical sites.
Two sites were identified as potential historic proper-
ties under NHPA One was Parker Cemetery, which
lies within the APE and is a location where Navajo
Code Talkers are interred. In addition, public com-
ments revealed some concerns about the proximity
of the facility to Black Peak, a sacred mountain
approximately 3 miles away.
weathering emissions above what would be released
were the permit to be denied.
In summary, 1 .P \ does not believe the permit deci-
sion will significantly affect facility operations, and has
made a determination that a permit decision relating
to Evoqua's management of RCRA hazardous waste
will have no adverse effect on historic or culturally
significant properties."
Contacts
You can find more information on Evoqua (formerly
Siemens) at US EPA Region 9's website:
http: / /www.epa.gov/region9 / waste / siemens / index.
html
For further information, please contact:
"Mike" Mahfouz Zabaneh, HE.
Environmental Engineer/Project Manager
Phone: (415) 972-3348
Fax: (415) 947-3533
2abaneh.Mahfouz@epa.gov
Mailing Address:
U.S. EPA Region 9, WST-4
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Area of Potential Effect and nearby identified historic or culturally
significant properties
For media inquiries, please contact:
Margot Perez-Sullivan
Phone: (415) 947-4149
perezsullivan.margot@epa.gov
Conclusion
EPA considered potential effects of facility opera-
tions on historic properties, including visual and
auditory impacts, and impacts stemming from the
presence of chemicals in the facility's emissions.
However, the Evoqua facility could continue operat-
ing whether or not a permit is issued, and EPA has
made a finding that visual or auditory impacts from
the facility will not be affected by the permit decision.
EPA has also assessed potential acid weathering
impacts of facility emissions on the headstones at the
Parker Cemetery and determined that the issuance of
a RCRA permit will not result in an increase in acid

-------