Semiannual Report OfUST Performance Measures
Mid Fiscal Year 2015 (October 1, 2014 - March 31, 2015)

Where does EPA get the performance data?

Twice each year, EPA collects data from states and territories regarding underground storage tank (UST)
performance measures and makes the data publicly available. EPA directly provides data on work in Indian country,
since the Agency implements the program for those sites. This data includes information such as the number of
active and closed tanks, releases confirmed, cleanups initiated and completed, facilities in compliance with UST
requirements, and inspections. EPA compiles the data and presents it in table format for all states, territories, and
Indian country.

What are the UST performance measures?

The most current definitions for the UST performance measures are available on EPA's website
www.epa.gov/oust/cat/camarchv.htm under Definitions.

What is in the mid fiscal year (FY) 2015 report?

Page

UST Corrective Action Measures For Mid FY 2015

Alphabetical By State Within Region	1

National Totals	5

UST National Backlog Graph	6

UST Compliance Measures For Mid FY 2015	7

States With More Stringent SOC Requirements	9

Inspection/Delivery Prohibition Actions For Mid FY 2015	11

How does the UST program's performance at mid FY 2015 compare with its FY 2015 goals and mid
FY 2014 performance?

Mid FY 2015 UST Program
Performance

Compare With FY 2015 UST
Program Goal

Compare With Mid FY 2014
UST Program Performance

Completed 5,017 cleanups (including 13
in Indian country)

Complete 8,600 or more
cleanups, including 30 in Indian
country

At mid FY 2014, completed
5,084 cleanups (including 13 in
Indian country)

71.8 percent significant operational
compliance rate

Achieve a significant operational
compliance rate of 70.5 percent
or higher

At mid FY 2014, the significant
operational compliance rate was
72.1 percent

Confirmed 3,378 releases, which is below
the midpoint of EPA's goal to decrease
confirmed releases

Decrease newly-confirmed
releases to fewer than 6,965

At mid FY 2014, confirmed 3,007
releases

13.8 percent of confirmed releases at
UST facilities remaining to be cleaned up

Reduce to 14 percent or less the
percent of confirmed releases at
UST facilities remaining to be
cleaned up

At mid FY 2014, reduced to 14.6
percent the percent of confirmed
releases at UST facilities
remaining to be cleaned up

AEPA

Office of Underground Storage Tanks, Washington, D.C. 20460
www.epa.gov/oust

May 2015


-------
What other highlights are included in the mid FY 2015 report?

•	There are 569,340 active USTs (at approximately 205,000 sites) which are regulated by EPA's UST
program

•	Since the 1984 inception of the UST program, 1,827,148 USTs have been properly closed

•	Of the 525,095 releases reported since the beginning of the UST program, 452,847 (or 86.2 percent)
have been cleaned up, leaving 72,248 remaining to be cleaned up

-	From FY 2010 through FY 2013, the UST program saw increased performance in cleaning up and
closing releases due in part to a one-time infusion of LUST Recovery Act money

•	42,073 on-site inspections at federally-regulated UST facilities were conducted between October 2014
and March 2015; of those:

-	42,021 were conducted by states, territories, and third-party inspectors

-	52 were conducted by EPA and credentialed tribal inspectors in Indian country

How are EPA and its partners doing at reducing the backlog of UST releases?

Reducing the number of releases remaining to be cleaned up (also known as the backlog) remains a priority
for the national UST program. The graphic on page 6 of this report shows that the national UST backlog of releases
remaining to be cleaned up has been declining for more than a decade. The rate of releases confirmed has held
steady since 2010 at approximately 6,000 to 7,000 releases reported each year; the cumulative number of confirmed
releases is now over 525,000. Viewed together, these data points show the progress EPA, states, territories, tribes,
and other UST partners are making in reducing the percent of confirmed releases at UST facilities pending cleanup
completion.

Over the last few years, the percent of confirmed releases pending cleanup completion has declined from
20.5 percent in 2009 to 13.8 percent at mid FY 2015. Looking back several more years, the percent of confirmed
releases pending cleanup completion was 29 percent in 2004.

Fiscal Year

Confirmed Releases

Cleanups
Remaining

Percent Of Confirmed

Releases Pending
Cleanup Completion*

Each Year

Cumulative

Mid 2015

3,378

525,095

72,248

13.8%

2014

6,847

521,270

73,947

14.2%

2013

6,128

514,123

77,717

15.1%

2012

5,674

507,540

82,903

16.3%

2011

5,998

501,723

87,983

17.5%

2010

6,328

494,997

93,123

18.8%

2009

7,168

488,496

100,165

20.5%

1

1

1

1

1

2004

7,850

447,233

129,827

29%

*Divide cleanups remaining by cumulative confirmed releases

Where can I find performance data from previous years?

EPA's website www.epa.gov/oust/cat/camarchv.htm provides the most current report, as well as historical
reports beginning with FY 1988, the first year reports were developed. Reports are listed beginning with the most
recent first.

For more information, contact Steven McNeely, EPA's Office of Underground Storage Tanks, at
mcneelv.steven@epa.qov or 703-603-7164.

AEPA

Office of Underground Storage Tanks, Washington, D.C. 20460
www.epa.gov/oust

May 2015


-------
UST Corrective Action Measures for Mid-Year FY 2015 (Data through March 31, 2015)

Region / State

Active
Tanks

Closed Tanks

Confirmed Releases

Cleanups
Initiated

Cleanups Completed

Cleanups
Remaining

Actions This Year

Cumulative

Actions This Year

Cumulative

ONE

CT

6,301

26,574

55

3,087

3,064

22

2,219

868

MA

9,674

25,468

15

6,413

6,344

32

6,202

211

ME

2,709

13,406

17

2,743

2,737

29

2,703

40

NH

2,962

11,995

18

2,622

2,622

21

2,017

605

Rl

1,546

8,560

4

1,379

1,379

7

1,226

153

VT

2,010

6,068

2

2,149

2,149

7

1,475

674

Subtotal

25,202

92,071

111

18,393

18,295

118

15,842

2,551

TWO

















NJ

13,567

63,962

1,017

14,253

13,506

617

10,392

3,861

NY

23,630

103,416

67

29,476

29,427

148

28,208

1,268

PR

4,491

5,789

2

1,070

837

3

502

568

VI

143

279

0

29

28

0

22

7

Subtotal

41,831

173,446

1,086

44,828

43,798

768

39,124

5,704

THREE

DC

633

3,377

14

927

912

2

821

106

DE

1,194

7,397

19

2,765

2,710

29

2,668

97

MD

7,709

35,895

68

12,151

11,977

72

11,897

254

PA

22,801

65,941

79

16,421

16,355

201

14,453

1,968

VA

18,244

62,209

83

12,430

12,333

103

12,103

327

WV

4,514

20,914

17

3,558

3,478

35

2,860

698

Subtotal

55,095

195,733

280

48,252

47,765

442

44,802

3,450

Definition of confirmed releases, cleanups initiated, and cleanups completed are on EPA's website at www.epa.gov/oust/cat/PMDefinitions.pdf

1


-------
UST Corrective Action Measures for Mid-Year FY 2015 (Data through March 31, 2015)

Region / State

Active
Tanks

Closed Tanks

Confirmed Releases

Cleanups
Initiated

Cleanups Completed

Cleanups
Remaining

Actions This Year

Cumulative

Actions This Year

Cumulative

FOUR

AL

17,954

30,689

40

11,881

11,724

56

10,672

1,209

FL

22,333

111,618

78

26,916

18,242

291

15,431

11,485

GA

29,277

49,953

114

13,535

13,337

181

12,374

1,161

KY

9,986

40,136

92

16,437

16,416

141

15,569

868

MS

8,213

23,720

58

7,651

7,500

46

7,270

381

NC

25,632

69,791

83

25,862

23,394

172

21,457

4,405

SC

11,677

33,522

47

9,840

9,480

88

7,537

2,303

TN

16,495

40,157

60

14,897

14,861

99

14,617

280

Subtotal

141,567

399,586

572

127,019

114,954

1,074

104,927

22,092

FIVE

IL

19,906

68,617

172

26,265

24,552

375

22,459

3,806

IN

13,448

42,488

69

9,738

9,669

179

7,975

1,763

Ml

18,174

70,649

89

22,637

22,230

198

14,208

8,429

MN

11,789

33,865

60

11,357

11,267

97

11,014

343

OH

21,844

46,811

279

30,937

30,798

279

28,781

2,156

Wl

14,283

68,467

58

19,392

19,111

53

18,335

1,057

Subtotal

99,444

330,897

727

120,326

117,627

1,181

102,772

17,554

Definition of confirmed releases, cleanups initiated, and cleanups completed are on EPA's website at www.epa.gov/oust/cat/PMDefinitions.pdf

2


-------
UST Corrective Action Measures for Mid-Year FY 2015 (Data through March 31, 2015)

Region / State

Active
Tanks

Closed Tanks

Confirmed Releases

Cleanups
Initiated

Cleanups Completed

Cleanups
Remaining

Actions This Year

Cumulative

Actions This Year

Cumulative

SIX

AR

8,841

21,609

26

1,720

1,426

12

1,419

301

LA

10,980

35,461

41

4,967

4,967

79

4,287

680

NM

3,708

12,890

14

2,616

2,319

6

1,772

844

OK

10,040

27,875

24

5,114

5,113

46

4,757

357

TX

50,629

120,792

120

27,233

26,320

130

25,549

1,684

Subtotal

84,198

218,627

225

41,650

40,145

273

37,784

3,866

SEVEN

IA

6,709

23,475

13

6,142

5,968

48

5,337

805

KS

6,549

21,028

20

5,182

5,061

43

3,840

1,342

MO

8,981

31,904

49

6,977

6,958

64

6,086

891

NE

6,532

15,081

34

6,436

5,395

50

5,112

1,324

Subtotal

28,771

91,488

116

24,737

23,382

205

20,375

4,362

EIGHT

CO

7,347

23,075

54

8,122

7,811

79

7,499

623

MT

3,148

11,802

4

3,063

2,930

21

2,183

880

ND

2,240

7,518

0

875

858

0

835

40

SD

3,167

6,878

8

2,726

2,585

19

2,584

142

UT

3,677

13,813

25

4,855

4,820

46

4,512

343

WY

1,700

8,078

3

2,668

2,552

93

1,850

818

Subtotal

21,279

71,164

94

22,309

21,556

258

19,463

2,846

Definition of confirmed releases, cleanups initiated, and cleanups completed are on EPA's website at www.epa.gov/oust/cat/PMDefinitions.pdf

3


-------
UST Corrective Action Measures for Mid-Year FY 2015 (Data through March 31, 2015)

Region / State

Active
Tanks

Closed Tanks

Confirmed Releases

Cleanups
Initiated

Cleanups Completed

Cleanups
Remaining

Actions This Year

Cumulative

Actions This Year

Cumulative

NINE

AS

5

63

0

8

7

0

7

1

AZ

6,585

21,772

52

8,838

8,247

21

8,081

757

CA

37,112

131,334

40

44,438

42,533

545

39,295

5,143

GU

250

475

1

140

140

1

120

20

HI

1,549

5,543

16

2,090

2,042

7

1,947

143

MP

64

72

0

14

14

0

14

0

NV

3,763

7,536

5

2,529

2,529

9

2,383

146

Subtotal

49,328

166,795

114

58,057

55,512

583

51,847

6,210

TEN

AK

1,003

6,727

11

2,411

2,378

23

2,082

329

ID

3,334

10,998

0

1,486

1,460

6

1,385

101

OR

5,573

26,464

21

7,446

7,285

38

6,588

858

WA

10,196

36,982

16

6,805

6,337

35

4,768

2,037

Subtotal

20,106

81,171

48

18,148

17,460

102

14,823

3,325

Definition of confirmed releases, cleanups initiated, and cleanups completed are on EPA's website at www.epa.gov/oust/cat/PMDefinitions.pdf

4


-------
UST Corrective Action Measures for Mid-Year FY 2015 (Data through March 31, 2015)



Active
Tanks



Confirmed Releases

Cleanups
Initiated

Cleanups Completed

Cleanups
Remaining

Region / State

Closed Tanks

Actions This Year

Cumulative

Actions This Year

Cumulative

REGIONAL CORRECTIVE ACTIONS FOR INDIAN COUNTRY

REGION 1

13

5

0

1

1

0

1

0

REGION 2

156

28

0

6

6

0

5

1

REGION 3

N/A1

N/A1

N/A1

N/A1

N/A1

N/A1

N/A1

0

REGION 4

68

77

0

15

15

0

10

5

REGION 5

460

1,042

1

240

223

0

176

64

REGION 6

347

309

0

67

67

1

65

2

REGION 7

80

96

0

21

21

0

13

8

REGION 8

544

2,129

1

538

531

2

404

134

REGION 9

461

1,363

2

299

223

8

236

63

REGION 10

390

1,121

1

189

189

2

178

11

SUBTOTAL

2,519

6,170

5

1,376

1,272

13

1,088

288

Active Tanks

Closed Tanks

Confirmed Releases

Cleanups
Initiated

Cleanups Completed

Cleanups
Remaining

Actions This Year

Cumulative

Actions This Year

Cumulative

| NATIONAL TOTAL 569,340

1,827,148

3,378

525,095

501,766

5,017

452,847

72,248

Definitions of confirmed releases, cleanups initiated, and cleanups completed are on EPA's website at www.epa.gov/oust/cat/PMDefinitions.pdf
1 N/A = Not Applicable. EPA Region 3 does not have any federally recognized tribes.

5


-------
"O

OJ
+Ļģ
Q)

Q.

E
o
u

nj

-S2
u



_o

u
m
CO

"ro
c
o

nj

200,000

180,000

UST National Backlog:
FY 1989 Through Mid-Year
FY 2015

$	O	^

O r-,- Ŗ/ Ŗ S3? n? fs

X ft ft Ŗ g

o & ,	, ^ ^ "* S ģ

- §
p>	I I I I I	1 o

01	fs	IS)

"I fV <0

i v ^ SP
•-*	rj

no oo

Oi" rv

'"v V _
rv O)

Of O}' CO
—	' to

1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Years

6


-------
UST Compliance Measures
for Mid-Year FY 2015 (April 1, 2014 - March 31, 2015)

Region / State

% in
Significant
Operational
Compliance
with Release
Prevention
Regulations

% in
Significant
Operational
Compliance
with Release
Detection
Regulations

% of UST
Facilities in
SOC w/UST

Release
Detection and
Release
Prevention

ONE

I—

o

77%

72%

64%

MA

85%

27%

25%

ME

81%

74%

62%

NH

66%

69%

52%

Rl1

74%

77%

64%

VT1

88%

86%

79%

SUBTOTAL

80%

56%

49%

TWO

NJ

93%

96%

90%

NY

84%

73%

69%

PR

75%

74%

67%

VI

81%

100%

81%

SUBTOTAL

86%

81%

76%

THREE

DC

90%

86%

79%

DE

94%

97%

93%

MD

81%

90%

75%

PA

85%

84%

75%

VA

86%

76%

70%

WV

88%

86%

77%

SUBTOTAL

85%

83%

74%



% in

% in

% of UST

Region / State

Significant
Operational
Compliance
with Release

Significant
Operational
Compliance
with Release

Facilities in
SOC w/UST

Release
Detection and



Prevention

Detection

Release



Regulations

Regulations

Prevention

FOUR

AL

90%

78%

72%

FL

99%

75%

74%

GA

81%

75%

70%

KY

73%

75%

60%

MS

72%

65%

54%

NC

76%

70%

63%

SC

83%

81%

72%

TN

89%

88%

82%

SUBTOTAL

84%

76%

69%

FIVE

IL'

74%

67%

60%

IN

86%

94%

82%

Ml1

86%

65%

60%

MN

82%

83%

77%

OH

89%

71%

67%

Wl1

91%

86%

80%

SUBTOTAL

84%

76%

69%

SIX

AR

74%

74%

61%

LA

83%

82%

73%

NM

76%

80%

65%

OK

80%

89%

75%

TX

95%

90%

88%

SUBTOTAL

89%

87%

81%

These compliance rates indicate the percent of recently-inspected facilities in significant operational compliance (SOC) with federal UST
requirements from 4/1/14 through 3/31/15. According to EPA guidelines, states are allowed to report based on requirements more stringent
than the federal SOC requirements. States identified with footnote1 indicated they had done so, as described on pages 9 and 10.
Furthermore, states have different approaches to targeting inspections. For example, some states focus inspections on suspected non-
compliant facilities, while other states conduct random inspections.

1 States reporting based on requirements more stringent than the federal SOC requirements.

7


-------
UST Compliance Measures
for Mid-Year FY 2015 (April 1, 2014 - March 31, 2015)

Region / State

% in
Significant
Operational
Compliance
with Release
Prevention
Regulations

% in
Significant
Operational
Compliance
with Release
Detection
Regulations

% of UST
Facilities in
SOC w/UST

Release
Detection and
Release
Prevention

SEVEN

IA

88%

84%

78%

KS

54%

90%

51%

MO1

85%

96%

83%

NE1

81%

69%

61%

SUBTOTAL

78%

86%

69%

EIGHT

CO

85%

84%

83%

MT

90%

88%

81%

ND

93%

95%

90%

SD

75%

82%

66%

UT

92%

92%

86%

WY

99%

94%

93%

SUBTOTAL

87%

88%

82%

NINE

AS

100%

50%

50%

AZ

90%

97%

89%

CA

82%

75%

64%

GU

100%

96%

96%

HI

99%

98%

98%

MP

100%

92%

92%

NV

89%

85%

78%

SUBTOTAL

84%

79%

70%



% in

% in

% of UST

Region / State

Significant
Operational
Compliance
with Release

Significant
Operational
Compliance
with Release

Facilities in
SOC w/UST

Release
Detection and



Prevention

Detection

Release



Regulations

Regulations

Prevention

TEN

AK

80%

81%

73%

ID1

84%

77%

63%

OR

91%

91%

85%

WA

89%

84%

77%

SUBTOTAL

88%

85%

77%

INDIAN COUNTRY

REGION 1

DNA^

DNA^

DNA^

REGION 2

DNA^

DNA^

DNA^

REGION 3

N/Aj

N/Aj

N/Aj

REGION 4

88%

38%

38%

REGION 5

70%

73%

52%

REGION 6

100%

97%

97%

REGION 7

DNA^

DNA^

DNA^

REGION 8

62%

59%

55%

REGION 9

93%

91%

84%

REGION 10

89%

94%

83%

SUBTOTAL

81%

80%

71%

NATIONAL TOTAL

TOTAL

84.8%

79.1%

71.8%

These compliance rates indicate the percentage of recently-inspected facilities in significant operational compliance (SOC) with federal UST
requirements from 4/1/14 through 3/31/15. According to EPA guidelines, states are allowed to report based on requirements more stringent
than the federal SOC requirements. States identified with footnote1 indicated they had done so, as described on pages 9 and 10.
Furthermore, states have different approaches to targeting inspections. For example, some states focus inspections on suspected non-
compliant facilities, while other states conduct random inspections.

1	States reporting based on requirements more stringent than the federal SOC requirements.

2	DNA = Data Not Available.

3	N/A = Not Applicable. EPA Region 3 does not have any federally recognized tribes.

8


-------
States With Requirements More Stringent Than The Federal
Significant Operational Compliance Requirements

CONNECTICUT

Release Prevention: Operation and Maintenance of Cathodic Protection

•	Lining not allowed.

Release Detection: Testing

•	Tanks and piping require weekly and monthly monitoring for releases and records must be available
(for 2 of the most recent consecutive months and for 8 of the last 12 months).

•	Statistical Inventory Reconciliation (SIR) not allowed as a stand-alone method.

IDAHO

Release Prevention: Operation and Maintenance of Cathodic Protection

•	Three 60-day rectifier inspection checks are required.

•	Two three-year system checks are required for impressed current and galvanic.

Release Detection: Testing

•	Records required for the past 12 months.

Other

•	Percent of UST facilities in compliance with both release detection and release prevention also
factors in financial responsibility and EPAct requirements, such as operator training and secondary
containment.

ILLINOIS

Release Detection: Testing

•	Owner/operator must produce records within 30 minutes of arrival of inspector.

MICHIGAN

Release Detection: Required Methods

•	Owners/operators must have inventory control plus another method of release detection.

MISSOURI

Release Prevention: Cathodic Protection

•	All metal components in contact with any electrolyte must be cathodically protected.

NEBRASKA

Release Prevention: Spill Prevention

•	Owners/operators cannot have debris or water in the spill bucket.

Release Prevention: Reporting

•	Owner/operator must submit monthly inventory monitoring reports to the state.

Release Prevention: Temporarily Closed Tanks

•	Owner/operator must permanently close USTs that have been in temporary closed status for more
than one year.

RHODE ISLAND

Release Prevention: Operation and Maintenance

•	All tanks and piping are required to be tightness tested after a repair. No exemptions.

Release Prevention: Operation and Maintenance of Cathodic Protection

•	Impressed current cathodic protection systems are required to be tested every 2 years.

•	Sacrificial anode systems are required to be tested every 3 years.

Release Detection: Testing

•	Records required for the past 36 months.

•	Inventory control is required for all tanks (single-walled and double-walled).

•	The automatic tank gauge (ATG) has to be checked monthly and have an annual test conducted.

•	Tightness testing schedule is different than the federal requirement; it depends on the type of tank.

o Tank tightness must be performed on all single walled tanks.

9


-------
o Tightness tests must be performed every 5 years after the installation of the ATG until

the tank has been installed for 20 years and every 2 years thereafter,
o UST systems upgraded with interior lining and/or cathodic protections are not

required to have an ATG for 10 years after the upgrade. Tank tightness testing must
be conducted annually during these 10 years. After 10 years, an ATG is required and
tank tightness testing must be performed every 5 years until the tank has been installed
for 20 years and then every 2 years thereafter. The results of all tightness tests shall be
maintained for 3 years beyond the life of the facility.

•	Groundwater or vapor monitoring not accepted as a method of leak detection.

•	SIR not accepted.

VERMONT

Release Prevention: Operation and Maintenance of Cathodic Protection

•	Lining not allowed unless with impressed current.

Release Detection: Method Presence and Performance Requirements

•	Weekly monitoring required for tank and piping. Records must be available for the two most recent
consecutive months and for 8 of the last 12 months.

Release Detection: Testing

•	Inventory control /Tank Tightness Testing (TTT) not allowed as a release detection method after
6/30/98.

•	Manual Tank Gauge (MTG) allowed alone up to 550 gallons; 551-1,000 gallons, MTG with annual
TTT.

WISCONSIN

Release Prevention: Operation and Maintenance of Cathodic Protection

•	Require annual cathodic protection test.

Release Prevention: Spill Prevention

•	Require USTs to be equipped with overfill prevention equipment that will operate as follows (NFPA
30-2.6.1.4 - 2000 and 2003 version):

o Automatically shut off the flow of liquid into the tank when the tank is no more than 95%
full;

o Alert the transfer operator when the tank is no more than 90% full by restricting the flow of

liquid into the tank or triggering the high-level alarm; and,
o Other methods approved by the authority having jurisdiction.

Release Detection: Testing

•	Require NFPA 30A09.2.1 (2000 and 2003 versions). Accurate daily inventory records shall be
maintained and reconciled for all liquid fuel storage tanks for indication of possible leakage from
tanks or piping. The records shall be kept on the premises or shall be made available to the authority
having jurisdiction for the inspection within 24 hours of a written or verbal request. The records
shall include, as a minimum and by product, daily reconciliation between sales, use, receipts, and
inventory on hand. If there is more than one storage system serving an individual pump or
dispensing device for any product, the reconciliation shall be maintained separately for each system.

Release Detection: Deferment

•	No exclusion or deferment for "remote" emergency generator tanks.

Other

•	Require annual permit to operate that includes verification of financial responsibility.

10


-------
Inspection/Delivery Prohibition Actions
for Mid-Year FY 2015 (October 1, 2014 - March 31, 2015)



Number of On-

Number of

Region / State

Site
Inspections

Delivery
Prohibition



Conducted

Actions

ONE

CT

614

11

MA

286

0

ME

217

1

NH

123

0

Rl

118

1

VT

84

0

SUBTOTAL

1,442

13

TWO

NJ

517

56

NY

1,427

0

PR

79

0

VI

12

0

SUBTOTAL

2,035

56

THREE

DC

35

0

DE

47

2

MD

456

5

PA

1,491

44

VA

844

0

WV

291

3

SUBTOTAL

3,164

54



Number of On

Number of

Region / State

Site
Inspections

Delivery
Prohibition



Conducted

Actions

FOUR

AL

1,418

120

FL

2,974

0

GA

1,634

492

KY

918

81

MS

443

55

NC

1,702

111

SC

1,956

203

TN

1,350

172

SUBTOTAL

12,395

1,234

FIVE

IL

1,334

337

IN

514

0

Ml

1,063

153

MN

478

23

OH

1,174

0

Wl

986

80

SUBTOTAL

5,549

593

SIX

AR

552

21

LA

906

3

NM

274

5

OK

1,635

20

TX

2,046

5,285

SUBTOTAL

5,413

5,334

Not all states fully implement delivery prohibition at this time, and some states prohibit deliveries primarily for registration violations.

11


-------
Inspection/Delivery Prohibition Actions
for Mid-Year FY 2015 (October 1, 2014 - March 31, 2015)



Number of On-

Number of

Region / State

Site
Inspections

Delivery
Prohibition



Conducted

Actions

SEVEN

IA

828

30

KS

427

13

MO

1,065

0

NE

319

0

SUBTOTAL

2,639

43

EIGHT

CO

591

9

MT

239

3

ND

16

0

SD

159

0

UT

364

0

WY

141

6

SUBTOTAL

1,510

18

NINE

AS

4

0

AZ

155

9

CA

6,043

61

GU

16

0

HI

206

0

MP

4

0

NV

342

8

SUBTOTAL

6,770

78

Region / State

Number of On
Site
Inspections
Conducted

Number of
Delivery
Prohibition
Actions

TEN

AK

18

11

ID

158

0

OR

273

6

WA

655

2

SUBTOTAL

1,104

19

INDIAN COUNTRY

REGION 1

0

0

REGION 2

0

0

REGION 3

N/A1

N/A1

REGION 4

8

0

REGION 5

9

0

REGION 6

4

0

REGION 7

0

0

REGION 8

3

0

REGION 9

22

0

REGION 10

6

0

SUBTOTAL

52

0

NATIONAL TOTAL

TOTAL

42,073

7,442

Not all states fully implement delivery prohibition at this time, and some states prohibit deliveries primarily for registration violations.
1 N/A = Not Applicable. EPA Region 3 does not have any federally recognized tribes.

12


-------