PRO Fact Sheet No. 403

Partner Reported Opportunities (PROs)
for Reducing Methane Emissions

NaturalGasA

EPA POLLUTION PREVENTER '

Use Inert Gases and Pigs to Perform
Pipeline Purges

Technology/Practice Overview

Description

When pipeline segments are taken out of
service for operational or maintenance
purposes, it is common practice to
clepressurize the pipeline and vent the
natural gas to the atmosphere. To
prevent these emissions, Partners
reported using pigs and inert gas to
purge pipelines.

In implementing this practice, a pig is
inserted into the isolated section of
pipeline. Inert gas is then pumped in
behind the pig, which pushes natural gas
through to the product line. At the
appropriate shutoff point, the pig is
caught in a pig trap and the pipeline
blocked off. Once the pipeline is "gas-
free" the inert gas is vented to the
atmosphere.

Operating Requirements

Requires existing pig-launch and pig
trap facilities and a mobile nitrogen
supply.

Applicability

This practice applies to all pipeline
segments that are being taken out of
service for operational or maintenance
purposes.

Methane Emissions

The amount of avoided methane
emissions is a function of the pipeline
diameter, length, and pressure. Based
on the Pipeline Rules of Thumb
Handbook, Fourth Edition, (p. 270), the
amount of gas saved by the unit of
application is 90 Mcf per year per two
miles of 10-inch diameter pipeline. One
Partner reported avoiding 538 Mcf of
methane for 6 purges by using pigs and
inert gas.

Compressors/Engines

Dehydrators

Directed Inspection &
Maintenance

Pipelines

Pneumatics/Controls

Tanks

Valves

Wells

Other

Applicable Sector(s)

I I Production
Processing

Transmission
Distribution

Other Related Documents:

Economic Evaluation

Estimated
Gas Price

Annual
Methane
Savings

Value of
Annual
Gas Savings*

Estimated
Implementation
Cost

Incremental
Operating Cost

Payback
(months)

$7.00/Mcf

90 Mcf

$670

$0

$500

9 Months

$5.00/Mcf

90 Mcf

$480

$0

$500

13 Months

$3.00/Mcf

90 Mcf

$290

$0

$500

21 Months

* Whole gas savings are calculated using a conversion factor of 94% methane in pipeline quality natural gas.

Additional Benefits

¦ Safety of pipeline system and operators


-------
PRO Fact Sheet No. 403 Continued

Use Inert Gases and Pigs to Perform Pipeline Purges (cont'd)

Economic Analysis

Basis for Costs and Emissions Savings

Methane emissions reductions of 90 Mcf per year apply to
purging 2 miles of 10-inch diameter pipeline with
nitrogen at 280-psi pressure, once per year.

The economics of this PRO are based on nitrogen at $5
per Mcf up to 50 miles from the source to the pipeline
location and 2 operators working 8 hours each (labor rate
of $25 per hour). There is no capital equipment required.

Methane Content of Natural Gas

The average methane content of natural gas varies by natural gas
industry sector. The Natural Gas STAR Program assumes the
following methane content of natural gas when estimating
methane savings for Partner Reported Opportunities.

Production

79

%

Processing

87

%

Transmission and Distribution

94

%

Discussion

This practice employs inert gases in combination with a
pig to prevent venting of a valuable product when taking
a pipeline segment off-line for operational or
maintenance purposes. Though it can be cost-effective,
safety, not methane savings, is the primary reason for
using pigs and inert gas to purge pipelines.

EPA provides the suggested methane emissions estimating methods contained
in this document as a tool to develop basic methane emissions estimates only.
As regulatory reporting demands a higher-level of accuracy, the methane emis-
sion estimating methods and terminology contained in this document may not
conform to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule, 40 CFR Part 98, Subpart W
methods or those in other EPA regulations.

2011

2


-------