Semiannual Report Of UST Performance Measures End Of Fiscal Year 2014 (October 1, 2013


Semiannual Report OfUST Performance Measures
End Of Fiscal Year 2014 (October 1, 2013 - September 30, 2014)
Where does EPA get the performance data?
Twice each year, EPA collects data from states and territories regarding underground storage tank (UST)
performance measures and makes the data publicly available. EPA directly provides data on work in Indian country,
since the Agency implements the program for those sites. This data includes information such as the number of
active and closed tanks, releases confirmed, cleanups initiated and completed, facilities in compliance with UST
requirements, and inspections. EPA compiles the data and presents it in table format for all states, territories, and
Indian country.
What are the UST performance measures?
The most current definitions for the UST performance measures are available on EPA's website
www.epa.gov/oust/cat/camarchv.htm under Definitions.
What is in the end of fiscal year (FY) 2014 report?
UST Corrective Action Measures For End Of FY 2014
Alphabetical By State Within Region
National Totals
UST National Backlog Graph
UST Compliance Measures For End Of FY 2014
States With More Stringent SOC Requirements
Inspection/Delivery Prohibition Actions End Of FY 2014
How does the UST program's performance compare with its goals?
FY 2014 UST Program Performance
FY 2014 UST Program Goal
Exceeded the FY 2014 goal by completing 10,393 cleanups;
missed the Indian country cleanup goal, but completed 26
cleanups in Indian country
Complete 9,000 or more cleanups, including
37 in Indian country
Exceeded the FY 2014 goal by achieving a significant operational
compliance rate of 72.5 percent
Achieve a significant operational compliance
rate of 70 percent or higher
Exceeded the FY 2014 goal by reporting 6,847 newly-confirmed
releases
Decrease newly-confirmed releases to fewer
than 7,330
Exceeded the FY 2014 goal by reducing to 14.2 percent the
percent of confirmed releases at UST facilities remaining to be
cleaned up
Reduce to 15 percent or less the percent of
confirmed releases at UST facilities
remaining to be cleaned up
What other highlights are included in the end of FY 2014 report?
•	There are 570,731 active USTs (at approximately 205,000 sites) which are regulated by EPA's UST
program
•	Since the 1984 inception of the UST program, 1,816,695 USTs have been properly closed
•	Of the 521,271 releases reported since the beginning of the UST program, 447,323 (or 85.8 percent)
have been cleaned up, leaving 73,948 remaining to be cleaned up
Page
1
5
6
7
9
11
v>EPA
Office of Underground Storage Tanks, Washington, D.C. 20460
www.epa.gov/oust
November 2014

-------
-	From FY 2010 through FY 2013, the UST program saw increased performance in cleaning up and
closing releases due in part to a one-time infusion of LUST Recovery Act money
• 92,883 on-site inspections at federally-regulated UST facilities were conducted between October 2013
and September 2014; of those:
-	92,524 were conducted by states, territories, and third-party inspectors
-	359 were conducted by EPA and credentialed tribal inspectors in Indian country
How are EPA and its partners doing at reducing the backlog of UST releases?
Reducing the number of releases remaining to be cleaned up (also known as the backlog) remains a priority
for the national UST program. The graphic on page 6 of this report shows that the national UST backlog of releases
remaining to be cleaned up has been declining for more than a decade. The rate of releases confirmed has held
steady since 2010 at approximately 6,000 to 7,000 releases reported each year; the cumulative number of confirmed
releases is now over 521,000. Viewed together, these data points show the progress EPA, states, territories, tribes,
and other UST partners are making in reducing the percent of confirmed releases at UST facilities pending cleanup
completion.
Over the last few years, the percent of confirmed releases pending cleanup completion has declined from
20.5 percent in 2009 to 14.2 percent at end of FY 2014. Looking back several more years, the percent of confirmed
releases pending cleanup completion was 29 percent in 2004.
Fiscal Year
Confirmed Releases
Cleanups
Remaining
Percent Of Confirmed
Releases Pending
Cleanup Completion*
Each Year
Cumulative
2014
6,847
521,271
73,948
14.2%
2013
6,128
514,123
77,717
15.1%
2012
5,674
507,540
82,903
16.3%
2011
5,998
501,723
87,983
17.5%
2010
6,328
494,997
93,123
18.8%
2009
7,168
488,496
100,165
20.5%
1
1
1
1
1
2004
7,850
447,233
129,827
29%
*Divide cleanups remaining by cumulative confirmed releases
Where can I find performance data from previous years?
EPA's website www.epa.gov/oust/cat/camarchv.htm provides the most current report, as well as historical
reports beginning with FY 1988, the first year reports were developed. Reports are listed beginning with the most
recent first.
For more information, contact Steven McNeely, EPA's Office of Underground Storage Tanks, at
mcneelv.steven@epa.qov or 703-603-7164.
v>EPA
Office of Underground Storage Tanks, Washington, D.C. 20460
www.epa.gov/oust
November 2014

-------
UST Corrective Action Measures for End of Year FY 2014 (Data through September 30, 2014)
Region / State
Active
Tanks
Closed Tanks
Confirmed Releases
Cleanups
Initiated
Cleanups Completed
Cleanups
Remaining
Actions This Year
Cumulative
Actions This Year
Cumulative
ONE
CT
6,279
26,334
49
3,030
3,017
43
2,196
834
MA
9,739
25,359
44
6,398
6,329
82
6,170
228
ME
2,738
13,344
38
2,726
2,726
58
2,674
52
NH
2,979
11,944
21
2,604
2,604
46
1,996
608
Rl
1,548
8,520
7
1,374
1,374
11
1,219
155
VT
2,019
6,051
7
2,147
2,147
35
1,468
679
Subtotal
25,302
91,552
166
18,279
18,197
275
15,723
2,556
TWO








NJ
13,795
63,929
1,618
13,236
13,133
1,126
9,775
3,461
NY
23,192
102,728
308
29,409
29,360
456
28,060
1,349
PR
4,489
5,785
4
1,068
836
1
499
569
VI
143
279
2
29
28
1
22
7
Subtotal
41,619
172,721
1,932
43,742
43,357
1,584
38,356
5,386
THREE
DC
634
3,370
12
913
898
15
819
94
DE
1,214
7,367
49
2,746
2,684
73
2,639
107
MD
7,803
35,719
165
12,086
11,912
204
11,825
261
PA
22,805
65,696
246
15,962
15,800
288
13,870
2,092
VA
18,199
62,069
133
12,326
12,233
182
11,974
352
WV
4,565
20,820
73
3,541
3,461
90
2,825
716
Subtotal
55,220
195,041
678
47,574
46,988
852
43,952
3,622
Definition of confirmed releases, cleanups initiated, and cleanups completed are on EPA's website at www.epa.gov/oust/cat/PMDefinitions.pdf
1

-------
UST Corrective Action Measures for End of Year FY 2014 (Data through September 30, 2014)
Region / State
Active
Tanks
Closed Tanks
Confirmed Releases
Cleanups
Initiated
Cleanups Completed
Cleanups
Remaining
Actions This Year
Cumulative
Actions This Year
Cumulative
FOUR
AL
17,980
30,619
77
11,841
11,706
117
10,616
1,225
FL
22,363
111,428
84
26,838
17,943
344
15,140
11,698
GA
29,283
49,723
223
13,421
13,220
356
12,190
1,231
KY
10,088
39,915
222
16,345
16,320
392
15,502
843
MS
8,209
23,661
122
7,593
7,461
90
7,224
369
NC
25,850
69,472
274
25,779
23,360
387
21,285
4,494
SC
11,716
33,404
68
9,793
9,446
147
7,449
2,344
TN
16,465
40,015
207
14,837
14,801
255
14,518
319
Subtotal
141,954
398,237
1,277
126,447
114,257
2,088
103,924
22,523
FIVE
IL
20,022
68,368
348
26,093
24,392
750
22,084
4,009
IN
13,208
39,670
155
9,679
9,606
277
7,796
1,883
Ml
18,353
70,315
154
22,548
22,156
488
14,010
8,538
MN
12,207
33,034
170
11,297
11,184
202
10,917
380
OH
21,923
46,333
526
30,658
30,512
604
28,502
2,156
Wl
14,273
68,282
94
19,333
19,139
145
18,282
1,051
Subtotal
99,986
326,002
1,447
119,608
116,989
2,466
101,591
18,017
Definition of confirmed releases, cleanups initiated, and cleanups completed are on EPA's website at www.epa.gov/oust/cat/PMDefinitions.pdf
2

-------
UST Corrective Action Measures for End of Year FY 2014 (Data through September 30, 2014)
Region / State
Active
Tanks
Closed Tanks
Confirmed Releases
Cleanups
Initiated
Cleanups Completed
Cleanups
Remaining
Actions This Year
Cumulative
Actions This Year
Cumulative
SIX
AR
8,892
21,515
33
1,686
1,397
42
1,401
285
LA
11,024
35,312
136
4,893
4,893
156
4,055
838
NM
3,736
12,850
6
2,602
2,318
13
1,766
836
OK
10,053
27,763
71
5,090
5,089
79
4,711
379
TX
50,724
120,236
248
27,113
26,222
282
25,419
1,694
Subtotal
84,429
217,676
494
41,384
39,919
572
37,352
4,032
SEVEN
IA
6,720
23,401
28
6,143
5,930
129
5,289
854
KS
6,561
20,977
44
5,161
5,032
59
3,799
1,362
MO
9,015
31,795
98
6,929
6,912
109
6,019
910
NE
6,562
15,031
54
6,395
5,345
125
5,062
1,333
Subtotal
28,858
91,204
224
24,628
23,219
422
20,169
4,459
EIGHT
CO
7,414
22,584
115
8,068
7,775
162
7,420
648
MT
3,155
11,769
20
3,064
2,927
79
2,163
901
ND
2,221
7,492
3
870
853
2
834
36
SD
2,876
7,261
37
2,718
2,577
20
2,565
153
UT
3,684
13,753
59
4,823
4,765
95
4,466
357
WY
1,731
8,040
13
2,668
2,449
108
1,756
912
Subtotal
21,081
70,899
247
22,211
21,346
466
19,204
3,007
Definition of confirmed releases, cleanups initiated, and cleanups completed are on EPA's website at www.epa.gov/oust/cat/PMDefinitions.pdf
3

-------
UST Corrective Action Measures for End of Year FY 2014 (Data through September 30, 2014)
Region / State
Active
Tanks
Closed Tanks
Confirmed Releases
Cleanups
Initiated
Cleanups Completed
Cleanups
Remaining
Actions This Year
Cumulative
Actions This Year
Cumulative
NINE
AS
5
63
0
8
7
0
7
1
AZ
6,672
21,645
76
8,786
8,229
61
8,060
726
CA
37,207
131,054
114
44,381
42,264
1,281
38,745
5,636
GU
244
472
0
139
139
0
119
20
HI
1,557
5,528
24
2,076
2,036
18
1,938
138
MP
72
62
0
11
11
0
11
0
NV
3,763
7,507
6
2,521
2,521
13
2,374
147
Subtotal
49,520
166,331
220
57,922
55,207
1,373
51,254
6,668
TEN
AK
1,014
6,706
34
2,400
2,371
54
2,059
341
ID
3,344
10,972
4
1,486
1,457
15
1,379
107
OR
5,586
26,408
45
7,426
7,259
87
6,550
876
WA
10,302
36,801
67
6,789
6,337
113
4,733
2,056
Subtotal
20,246
80,887
150
18,101
17,424
269
14,721
3,380
Definition of confirmed releases, cleanups initiated, and cleanups completed are on EPA's website at www.epa.gov/oust/cat/PMDefinitions.pdf
4

-------
UST Corrective Action Measures for End of Year FY 2014 (Data through September 30, 2014)

Active
Tanks

Confirmed Releases
Cleanups
Initiated
Cleanups Completed
Cleanups
Remaining
Region / State
Closed Tanks
Actions This Year
Cumulative
Actions This Year
Cumulative
REGIONAL CORRECTIVE ACTIONS FOR INDIAN COUNTRY
REGION 1
13
5
0
1
1
0
1
0
REGION 2
156
28
0
6
6
0
5
1
REGION 3
N/A1
N/A1
N/A1
N/A1
N/A1
N/A1
N/A1
0
REGION 4
70
75
0
15
15
0
10
5
REGION 5
471
1,043
1
241
223
3
176
65
REGION 6
344
298
2
67
67
1
64
3
REGION 7
80
96
1
21
21
0
13
8
REGION 8
542
2,138
1
542
534
12
407
135
REGION 9
451
1,360
4
297
223
7
228
69
REGION 10
389
1,102
3
185
181
3
173
12
SUBTOTAL
2,516
6,145
12
1,375
1,271
26
1,077
298












Confirmed Releases
Cleanups
Initiated
Cleanups Completed
Cleanups
Remaining

Active Tanks
Closed Tanks
Actions This Year
Cumulative
Actions This Year
Cumulative
NATIONAL TOTAL
570,731
1,816,695
6,847
521,271
498,173
10,393
447,323
73,948
Definitions of confirmed releases, cleanups initiated, and cleanups completed are on EPA's website at www.epa.gov/oust/cat/PMDefinitions.pdf
1 N/A = Not Applicable. EPA Region 3 does not have any federally recognized tribes.
5

-------
UST National Backlog:
FY 1989 Through End of Year
FY 2014
"O

_o
u
nj
CO
"ro
c
o
nj
^ 9 # *
£ 4 ,00s 3
Oo
ry
oo





of
£y




1
Of
«-/
CD
-------
UST Compliance Measures
for End of Year FY 2014 (October 1, 2013 - September 30, 2014)

% in
% in
% of UST
Region / State
Significant
Operational
Compliance
with Release
Significant
Operational
Compliance
with Release
Facilities in
SOC w/UST
Release
Detection and

Prevention
Detection
Release

Regulations
Regulations
Prevention
ONE
I—
o
76%
73%
64%
MA
83%
29%
29%
ME
82%
75%
63%
NH
66%
69%
46%
Rl1
77%
75%
67%
VT1
87%
85%
82%
SUBTOTAL
79%
57%
50%
TWO
NJ
95%
96%
92%
NY
84%
73%
69%
PR
64%
63%
54%
VI
100%
75%
75%
SUBTOTAL
85%
80%
75%
THREE
DC
87%
87%
78%
DE
93%
96%
91%
MD
78%
90%
72%
PA
92%
88%
83%
VA
86%
76%
70%
WV
86%
85%
76%
SUBTOTAL
87%
84%
77%

% in
% in
% of UST
Region / State
Significant
Operational
Compliance
with Release
Significant
Operational
Compliance
with Release
Facilities in
SOC w/UST
Release
Detection and

Prevention
Detection
Release

Regulations
Regulations
Prevention
FOUR
AL
90%
80%
73%
FL
98%
78%
77%
GA
78%
73%
67%
KY
75%
76%
62%
MS
74%
69%
58%
NC
76%
72%
65%
SC
85%
83%
74%
TN
90%
89%
83%
SUBTOTAL
84%
77%
70%
FIVE
IL1
76%
70%
63%
IN
86%
92%
82%
Ml1
85%
64%
59%
MN
81%
82%
75%
OH
90%
72%
68%
Wl1
91%
87%
81%
SUBTOTAL
85%
76%
70%
SIX
AR
71%
74%
59%
LA
81%
81%
72%
NM
80%
83%
71%
OK
77%
89%
71%
TX
95%
92%
90%
SUBTOTAL
88%
88%
81%
These compliance rates indicate the percent of recently-inspected facilities in significant operational compliance (SOC) with federal UST
requirements from 10/1/13 through 9/30/14. According to EPA guidelines, states are allowed to report based on requirements more
stringent than the federal SOC requirements. States identified with footnote1 indicated they had done so, as described on pages 9 and 10.
Furthermore, states have different approaches to targeting inspections. For example, some states focus inspections on suspected non-
compliant facilities, while other states conduct random inspections.
1 States reporting based on requirements more stringent than the federal SOC requirements.
7
-------
UST Compliance Measures
for End of Year FY 2014 (October 1, 2013 - September 30, 2014)

% in
% in
% of UST
Region / State
Significant
Operational
Compliance
with Release
Significant
Operational
Compliance
with Release
Facilities in
SOC w/UST
Release
Detection and

Prevention
Detection
Release

Regulations
Regulations
Prevention
SEVEN
IA
82%
76%
73%
KS1
59%
91%
56%
MO1
84%
97%
81%
NE
80%
69%
59%
SUBTOTAL
77%
84%
68%
EIGHT
CO
76%
73%
72%
MT
95%
93%
89%
ND
92%
93%
89%
SD
73%
81%
64%
UT
93%
91%
86%
WY
98%
93%
91%
SUBTOTAL
85%
84%
79%
NINE
AS
100%
100%
100%
AZ
95%
98%
87%
CA
86%
75%
68%
GU
100%
95%
95%
HI
99%
98%
98%
MP
100%
89%
89%
NV
90%
89%
83%
SUBTOTAL
88%
80%
73%

% in
% in
% of UST
Region / State
Significant
Operational
Compliance
with Release
Significant
Operational
Compliance
with Release
Facilities in
SOC w/UST
Release
Detection and

Prevention
Detection
Release

Regulations
Regulations
Prevention
TEN
AK
81%
82%
73%
ID1
81%
72%
56%
OR
91%
92%
86%
WA
84%
81%
71%
SUBTOTAL
85%
82%
73%
INDIAN COUNTRY
REGION 1
DNA'
DNA'
DNA'
REGION 2
83%
63%
63%
REGION 3
N/AJ
N/AJ
N/AJ
REGION 4
70%
66%
50%
REGION 5
83%
67%
55%
REGION 6
95%
98%
93%
REGION 7
0%
0%
0%
REGION 8
58%
62%
53%
REGION 9
86%
81%
72%
REGION 10
88%
94%
81%
SUBTOTAL
80%
77%
68%
NATIONAL TOTAL
TOTAL
84.9%
79.6%
72.5%
These compliance rates indicate the percentage of recently-inspected facilities in significant operational compliance (SOC) with federal UST
requirements from 10/1/13 through 9/30/14. According to EPA guidelines, states are allowed to report based on requirements more
stringent than the federal SOC requirements. States identified with footnotel indicated they had done so, as described on pages 9 and 10.
Furthermore, states have different approaches to targeting inspections. For example, some states focus inspections on suspected non-
compliant facilities, while other states conduct random inspections.
1	States reporting based on requirements more stringent than the federal SOC requirements.
2	DNA = Data Not Available.
3	N/A = Not Applicable. EPA Region 3 does not have any federally recognized tribes.
8
-------
States With Requirements More Stringent Than The Federal
Significant Operational Compliance Requirements
CONNECTICUT
Release Prevention: Operation and Maintenance of Cathodic Protection
•	Lining not allowed.
Release Detection: Testing
•	Tanks and piping require weekly and monthly monitoring for releases and records must be available
(for 2 of the most recent consecutive months and for 8 of the last 12 months).
•	Statistical Inventory Reconciliation (SIR) not allowed as a stand-alone method.
IDAHO
Release Prevention: Operation and Maintenance of Cathodic Protection
•	Three 60-day rectifier inspection checks are required.
•	Two three-year system checks are required for impressed current and galvanic.
Release Detection: Testing
•	Records required for the past 12 months.
Other
•	Percent of UST facilities in compliance with both release detection and release prevention also
factors in financial responsibility and EPAct requirements, such as operator training and secondary
containment.
ILLINOIS
Release Detection: Testing
•	Owner/operator must produce records within 30 minutes of arrival of inspector.
KANSAS
Release Prevention: Spill Prevention
•	Owners/operators cannot have debris or water in the spill bucket.
Release Prevention: Cathodic Protection
•	Owner/operator must ensure that the cathodic protection rectifier log is available at the time of
inspection.
MICHIGAN
Release Detection: Required Methods
•	Owners/operators must have inventory control plus another method of release detection.
MISSOURI
Release Prevention: Cathodic Protection
•	All metal components in contact with any electrolyte must be cathodically protected.
RHODE ISLAND
Release Prevention: Operation and Maintenance
•	All tanks and piping are required to be tightness tested after a repair. No exemptions.
Release Prevention: Operation and Maintenance of Cathodic Protection
•	Impressed current cathodic protection systems are required to be tested every 2 years.
•	Sacrificial anode systems are required to be tested every 3 years.
Release Detection: Testing
•	Records required for the past 36 months.
•	Inventory control is required for all tanks (single-walled and double-walled).
•	The automatic tank gauge (ATG) has to be checked monthly and have an annual test conducted.
•	Tightness testing schedule is different than the federal requirement; it depends on the type of tank.
o Tank tightness must be performed on all single walled tanks.
o Tightness tests must be performed every 5 years after the installation of the ATG until
the tank has been installed for 20 years and every 2 years thereafter.
9
-------
o UST systems upgraded with interior lining and/or cathodic protections are not
required to have an ATG for 10 years after the upgrade. Tank tightness testing must
be conducted annually during these 10 years. After 10 years, an ATG is required and
tank tightness testing must be performed every 5 years until the tank has been installed
for 20 years and then every 2 years thereafter. The results of all tightness tests shall be
maintained for 3 years beyond the life of the facility.
•	Groundwater or vapor monitoring not accepted as a method of leak detection.
•	SIR not accepted.
VERMONT
Release Prevention: Operation and Maintenance of Cathodic Protection
•	Lining not allowed unless with impressed current.
Release Detection: Method Presence and Performance Requirements
•	Weekly monitoring required for tank and piping. Records must be available for the two most recent
consecutive months and for 8 of the last 12 months.
Release Detection: Testing
•	Inventory control /Tank Tightness Testing (TTT) not allowed as a release detection method after
6/30/98.
•	Manual Tank Gauge (MTG) allowed alone up to 550 gallons; 551-1,000 gallons, MTG with annual
TTT.
WISCONSIN
Release Prevention: Operation and Maintenance of Cathodic Protection
•	Require annual cathodic protection test.
Release Prevention: Spill Prevention
•	Require USTs to be equipped with overfill prevention equipment that will operate as follows (NFPA
30-2.6.1.4 - 2000 and 2003 version):
o Automatically shut off the flow of liquid into the tank when the tank is no more than 95%
full;
o Alert the transfer operator when the tank is no more than 90% full by restricting the flow of
liquid into the tank or triggering the high-level alarm; and,
o Other methods approved by the authority having jurisdiction.
Release Detection: Testing
•	Require NFPA 30A09.2.1 (2000 and 2003 versions). Accurate daily inventory records shall be
maintained and reconciled for all liquid fuel storage tanks for indication of possible leakage from
tanks or piping. The records shall be kept on the premises or shall be made available to the authority
having jurisdiction for the inspection within 24 hours of a written or verbal request. The records
shall include, as a minimum and by product, daily reconciliation between sales, use, receipts, and
inventory on hand. If there is more than one storage system serving an individual pump or
dispensing device for any product, the reconciliation shall be maintained separately for each system.
Release Detection: Deferment
•	No exclusion or deferment for "remote" emergency generator tanks.
Other
•	Require annual permit to operate that includes verification of financial responsibility.
10
-------
Inspection/Delivery Prohibition Actions
for End of Year FY 2014 (October 1, 2013 - September 30, 2014)

Number of On-
Number of
Region / State
Site
Inspections
Delivery
Prohibition

Conducted
Actions
ONE
CT
1,137
17
MA
677
0
ME
1,228
0
NH
381
12
Rl
382
0
VT
349
3
SUBTOTAL
4,154
32
TWO
NJ
1,242
176
NY
2,947
0
PR
490
0
VI
24
0
SUBTOTAL
4,703
176
THREE
DC
89
0
DE
158
1
MD
1,111
15
PA
2,835
38
VA
2,033
3
WV
742
8
SUBTOTAL
6,968
65

Number of On
Number of
Region / State
Site
Inspections
Delivery
Prohibition

Conducted
Actions
FOUR
AL
2,998
230
FL
4,766
0
GA
3,145
480
KY
2,172
146
MS
1,036
70
NC
3,552
157
SC
3,685
472
TN
2,923
182
SUBTOTAL
24,277
1,737
FIVE
IL
3,445
752
IN
1,604
1
Ml
2,563
209
MN
1,469
10
OH
2,786
0
Wl
4,553
244
SUBTOTAL
16,420
1,216
SIX
AR
1,123
55
LA
1,451
10
NM
625
3
OK
3,448
68
TX
3,135
5,544
SUBTOTAL
9,782
5,680
Not all states fully implement delivery prohibition at this time, and some states prohibit deliveries primarily for registration violations.
11
-------
Inspection/Delivery Prohibition Actions
for End of Year FY 2014 (October 1, 2013 - September 30, 2014)

Number of On-
Number of
Region / State
Site
Inspections
Delivery
Prohibition

Conducted
Actions
SEVEN
IA
585
83
KS
1,143
39
MO
1,416
0
NE
913
0
SUBTOTAL
4,057
122
EIGHT
CO
1,541
59
MT
395
4
ND
270
0
SD
422
0
UT
1,011
27
WY
386
2
SUBTOTAL
4,025
92
NINE
AS
4
0
AZ
876
2
CA
13,274
91
GU
72
0
HI
379
0
MP
25
0
NV
994
5
SUBTOTAL
15,624
98
Region / State
Number of On
Site
Inspections
Conducted
Number of
Delivery
Prohibition
Actions
TEN
AK
192
17
ID
423
0
OR
569
69
WA
1,330
7
SUBTOTAL
2,514
93
INDIAN COUNTRY
REGION 1
0
0
REGION 2
8
0
REGION 3
N/A1
N/A1
REGION 4
10
0
REGION 5
78
0
REGION 6
40
0
REGION 7
1
0
REGION 8
79
0
REGION 9
74
0
REGION 10
69
0
SUBTOTAL
359
0
NATIONAL TOTAL
TOTAL
92,883
9,311
Not all states fully implement delivery prohibition at this time, and some states prohibit deliveries primarily for registration violations.
1 N/A = Not Applicable. EPA Region 3 does not have any federally recognized tribes.
12
-------