EPA Region 8
Preparedness Unit

Vol. / No. 1	Planning, Prevention, and Preparedness Newsletter	January 2011

NEWSLETTER RELAUNCH

EPA Region 8 announces
start of new quarterly
newsletter.

Action part of Region' v re
-emphasis on outreach to
our response partners.

EPA Region 8 is proud to unveil
our own Region 8 newsletter -
PARatus (ready). We want to
make this truly your own news-
letter which will deliver relevant
information to you quarterly.
You need information to perform
your job professionally, and
we'll deliver that information to
you. We envision it being for the
thinking response professional.
While we will have different
articles and sections, we will
highlight a different thought pro-
voking aspect of response in
each issue. Our newsletter lias
been redesigned and is re-
launched after a hiatus of over 2
years. The newsletter is in-
tended to compliment other
newsletters from around the re-

gion.

What is PARatus? It is a
quarterly newsletter from
EPA Region 8 for the re-
sponse community. Our
goal is to provide you with
information on any and all
aspects of preparedness, and
to keep you abreast of up-
coming events of benefit to
you.

What PARatus is not!

There will be no fancy high
gloss pictures (OK maybe
some). Because we don't
have a large team of special-
ists working on original
articles, Paratus is projected
to arrive quarterly.

How will we do it? We

plan to rob, steal, plunder
and otherwise abscond with
articles from other newslet-
ters and web sites (full
credit and references pro-
vided). We will reprint any
articles (Maybe summarize
them) that we feel could be
of benefit to you and are in
the public domain. Some-
times we will even write

them ourselves or re-write articles
that may not be written well.

Be part of the solution! While we are
using Email for delivery, help us re-
solve our delivery and audience issue.
Let us know what the best delivery
option for you is. What would you
like to see in your newsletter? Don't
be part of the 10% not in the know.
Subscribe now and be the one with
the answers.

While every recipient of the prior
newsletter will be immediately added
to the list of new recipients, there
have been numerous changes in ad-
dresses, and we are accepting new
subscribers by simply calling or
sending Email to: Ray Figueroa at
figueroa. ray mondifgepa. gov). Please
give your name and Email to the same
number and Email address and re-
quest to be added to the Email list.

All are encouraged to provide sugges-
tions for new articles, provide com-
ments on the content of Paratus. or
even submit an article or tip. We
encourage the submission of lessons
learned from current or past experi-
ences. You may submit a story.

Inside this issue:

Inside Story Pg. 2:

New Governors' Guide to
State Homeland Security

Inside Story Pg.3:

EPA Announces new office of
International & Tribal Affairs

Inside Story Pg.4:

CAMEO and Tier II Enhance-
ments

New Chems to TRI List
SPCC Program

Inside Story Pg. 5:

Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administra-
tion (PHMSA)

information or article
for publication. We
are actively seeking
articles, essays, pho-
tos, artwork, and cal-
endar items for your
newsletter.

TRAINING & EXERCISES

Luke Chavez—Coordinator

303-3/2-65/2 / chavez.fuke@ej5q.gov

OPERATION NEPTUNE - DOUGLAS COUNTY, COLORADO
FULL SCALE AND RECOVERY TABLE TOP EXERCISE :

On October
6, 2010,
Douglas
County
Emergency
Management conducted a full
scale exercise (FSE). Approxi-
mately 150 people from several
local, state and federal partners
participated in the planning,
evaluating, controlling and play-
ing in this exercise. EPA has
been part of the planning team in

designing this FSE for the
past year. EPA previously
participated in a Douglas
County table top exercise
(TTX) in preparation for
this 2010 FSE and as part of
the exercise building proc-
ess under the Homeland
Security Exercise and
Evaluation Program
(HSEEP). The FSE tested
emergency operation plans
in the Roxborough commu-

nity just south of Denver, Colorado in
response to a hazardous materials re-
lease due to a terrorist act.

The exercise scenario involved a ter-
rorist act of hijacking a chlorine tanker
truck in a semi-densely populated area
in Douglas County, CO.

The tanker released 20 tons of chlorine
after a law enforcement altercation and
an explosion. The FSE was conducted
in real time and tested (Cont. Pg 2)

Partner Corner

•	More localized info?
Check out these
sites.

•	Montana

•	Wyoming

•	North Dakota

•	South Dakota

•	Utah

•	Colorado


-------
Planning, Prevention, and Preparedness Newsletter

January 2011

OPERA TION NEPTUNE

(From pg. I)

the initial response in the first
four hours. Several objectives
were tested from the local, state
and federal level including On-
site Incident Management, In-
formation Sharing and Dissemi-
nation. Medical Surge, and
Weapons of Mass Destruction
(WMD)/Hazardous Material
Response and Decontamination.

Kathie Atencio and Luke
Chavez with the Preparedness,
Assessment and Response
(PAR) Program were part of the
planning team as well as evalu-
ated for the exercise objective
Weapons of Mass Destruction
(WMD)/Hazardous Materials
(HazMat) Response and Decon-
tamination. Joyce Ackermau
On Scene Coordinator (OSC)
and the Superfund Technical
Assessment and Response
Team (START) contractors
participated as players and were
part of the unified command
with the initial local responders.
The START team also de-

ployed the regional level A
response unit to the incident.

A TTX was also conducted as
a follow up on October 15,
2010, to address the recovery
portion of the incident.

Kathie Atencio, Luke Chavez
and Joyce Ackerman all par-
ticipated as players as well as
evaluators.

On October 22, 2010, an
After Action Conference
(AAC) was held where the
planning team and partici-
pants discussed both the FSE
and the TTX. The AAC dis-
cussed and determined posi-
tive outcomes of the exer-
cises, but more importantly,
how to improve the response
and communications with all
parties involved in such an
incident.

A final Improvement Plan
(IP) and ACC report was
combined for both exercises
and is available. The ACC/IP
documents outcomes and
findings of the FSE and TTX
and any action items to help
improve all participants' re-
sponse capabilities.

Being involved in planning
and as responders in Douglas
County's FSE was very bene-
ficial to EPA Region 8.	

EPA' s role in addressing haz-
ardous materials and assisting
local responders gave us a better
understanding of the County's
capabilities and how EPA would
collaborate with other responders
in an incident of this level. The
FSE planning was a great experi-
ence and opportunity to meet and
work with other local, state and
federal agencies that we would
normally be working with during

a response. EPA was also able to
test our own plans and proce-
dures and how we can improve
our response processes, capabili-
ties and time. Douglas County
Emergency Management
(DCEM) did an excellent job in
organizing, designing and plan-
ning this FSE. EPA is looking
forward to continue work with
DCEM as well as others in-
volved in the exercise event.

The Director of Emergency
Management for Douglas-
County, Fran Santagata, was
extremely pleased with EPA's

involvement in the exercise.
The EPA has been a solid
partner with Douglas County
through the very active Local
Emergency Planning Com-
mittee (LEPC). The Opera-
tion Neptune exercise series
was a culmination of collabo-
ration that has been ongoing
for years. Ms. Santagata
stated that valuable lessons
were learned as to EPA's on
scene capabilities that may be
critical in a real event for a
successful outcome. Local
responders realized where
they currently have some
chemical detection and iden-
tification gaps that can be
filled with EPA resources.
EPA also provided expertise
at the Recovery TTX as to
what the long term ramifica-
tions of a large release of
chlorine would be which as-
sists the County in planning
for this type of event. Ms.
Santagata stated that she is
looking forward to building
on the accomplishments from
Operation Neptune and con-
tinuing to enhance the
County's collaboration with
the EPA.

Did You Know? - Most vic-
tims of chemical accidents
are injured at home.

HOMELAND SECURITY Gina Cristiano - Homeland Security/RRT/RSC

	Coordinator 3Q3-312-6688 / cristianq.gina@epa.gov

Natio

Governors Association Publishes New Guide to State Homeland Security

Guide to Homeland Security,
views related activities through
the lenses of preparedness, pre-
vention, response, and recov-
ery.

By Mickey
McCarter
Tuesday,
09 Novem-
ber 2010

NGA
offers
advice for
newly elected governors

In the wake of last week's elec-
tions, the National Governors
Association (NGA) Monday
released a handbook to guide
newly elected state governors
through setting up and managing
state homeland security opera-
tions.

"Governors must be ready from
their first hours in office to re-

spond to the threats of terrorism
and disasters and ensure the
necessary mechanisms are in
place to protect citizens, prop-
erty and businesses," said John
Thomasian, director of the

NGA Center for Best Practices,
in a statement. "This can be a
daunting task, as the threats
individual

states face are diverse and ever
changing. This guide provides a
resource for governors taking
office, as well as veteran gover-
nors, as they determine how to
organize and operate homeland
security and public safety sys-
tems in their states." The result-
ing handbook, A Governor's

Within those disciplines, the
guide explores the coordination
of state homeland security and
emergency management agen-
cies, the establishment of the
authority of a governor's home-
land security advisor, the opera-
tion of emergency response
plans, the organization of state
fusion centers, and the use of
public Safety communications.

"How a governor addresses

these issues has tremendous
implications for a state,"
Thomasian said. "The state

strategies and best practices
contained in the guide en-
able governors to learn from
what has worked in other
states as they make these
important decisions."

The guide warns that gover-
nors must protect the citi-
zens of their states from
terrorism and natural disas-
ters, ranging from large-
scale incidents like the Sept.
11 terrorist attacks and Hur-
ricane Katrina (Cont. Pg. 3)

Page 2


-------
Planning, Prevention, and Preparedness Newsletter

January 2011

National Governors Association New Guide to State Homeland Security (From pg. 2)

to more localized plots like the
Hutaree militia group's plans to
kill police officers.

To assist governors with de-
fending against these threats
"from their first hour in office,"
the NGA guide walks them
through elements of disaster
preparation, prevention, re-
sponse, and recovery to organ-
ize activities under state
homeland security and emer-
gency

management agencies. In terms
of preparation, governors
should take care to select quali-
fied homeland security advisors
and to designate state admini-
stration agencies to manage
federal homeland security
funds, the handbook advises.

"Governors must also ensure
that appropriate stakeholders
are involved in preparedness
activities," the guide states.
"For example public health
professionals are critical play-
ers in most homeland security

incidents and should be in-
cluded in discussions In addi-
tion , the value of citizen pre-
paredness must be recognized
and communicated through
public service announcements
and social media campaigns,
before an incident occurs. Fi-
nally, all states must conduct
preparedness exercises to as-
sess readiness and capabilities
to respond to homeland secu-
rity incidents."

To bolster prevention, gover-
nors should strengthen state
fusion centers, the guide says.
Fusion centers centralize local,
state, and federal information
and intelligence analysis to
identify potential threats, pro-
viding governors with valuable
information on plots before
their perpetuators can complete
them. Fusion centers aggregate
information on a national scale
to "connect the dots" and bring
together disparate pieces of
information to warn of pending

plots that may extend outside of the
state as well, the guide notes.

Hie guide also emphasizes the need
for states to prevent cyber attacks—
a challenge requiring a comprehen-
sive inventory of the critical infra-
structure owned and operated by
the private sector but which the
state depends upon. To respond to
attacks or disasters when they do
occur, governors must have well-
rehearsed plans for tactics, opera-
tions, and communications. Gover-
nors must involve their chief of
staffs, communications directors,
homeland security advisors, emer-
gency management directors, fu-
sion center directors, state police
commanders, local law enforce-
ment agency chiefs, and public
health directors in the training for
these plans, the guide says.

Governors also must know where
to turn to call for help outside of
the state. Deploying National
Guard or calling for a presidential
disaster declaration could leverage
federal resources guide suggests,

while exercising emergency man-
agement assistance compacts could
draw help from other states in the
region

To recover from an incident, gover-
nors must make use of federal re-
sources available through the Fed-
eral Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) and other sources,
the guide says." To help coordinate
recovery efforts, governors can
create a central agency to help local
areas access state and federal re-
sources. These one-stop shops can
be extremely beneficial to individu-
als, businesses, local Governments,
and non-profit organizations," the
guide states. "For example, the
rebuild Iowa office and rebuild
Iowa Advisory Commission were
created following severe flooding
in 2008; the Louisiana recovery
Authority was established follow-
ing severe hurricanes in 2005; and
the Indiana office of Disaster re-
covery became a new lead agency
for the damaging storms in 2008."

A

i 4. L Actu

OUTREACH Luke Chavez 303-312-651 2/bernadette Rose 303-312-6072

EPA Announces the New Office of International and Tribal Affairs.

Action part of Administrator's priority to build strong tribal partnerships

In early 2009, Administrator
Jackson met with the National
Congress of American Indians
and announced her intention to
review the American Indian
Environmental Office's (AIEO)
placement in the EPA structure.
After consultation with the
National Tribal Caucus and
EPA leadership in July 2009,
she announced the restructuring
that would move AIEO from
the Office of Water to the Of-
fice of International Affairs,
and rename the office to reflect
the inclusion. "Tribes and
tribal lands face disproportion-
ate environmental and public
health concerns" said Michelle
DePass, assistant administrator
for the new OITA. "It is my
honor to assume leadership of
the American Indian Environ-
mental Office - and I look for-
ward to working with tribal
communities as partners in
overall efforts to address these

pressing issues.

The President's 2011 budget
request for the Agency includes
a $41.4 million increase in
tribal funding across the coun-
try, of which $30 million is
targeted for new multi-media
tribal grants. This new grant
program will be tailored to
address individual tribes' most
serious environmental needs
through the implementation of
environmental programs, and
will help tribes address their
environmental priorities to the
fullest extent possible. In addi-
tion, a 24 percent increase of
$2.9 million is proposed to
support new staff positions to
oversee, provide guidance,
and ensure accountability for
the new grant program an addi-
tional $8.5 million is provided
for General Assistance Program
grants which can be put to-
wards programs and projects
ranging from assistance for

enforcement and compliance
activities to education and job
training.

Recently, the Preparedness Unit
in Region 8 finalized an inter-
agency agreement with the In-
dian Health Service to assist the
Program in meeting with all 27
tribal governments over the next
couple of years.

The goal of the Program is to
create a foundation to better
understand the priorities, risks,
and vulnerabilities of the Region
8 tribes. This will help the Pro-
gram to identify opportunities to
improve planning and prepared-
ness efforts through a region-
wide approach and to strengthen
partnerships. Phase I of our
outreach is to meet with all the
tribes to determine:

•	What the tribe's planning
and response capabilities are;

•	If the tribe is receiving grant
funding;

•	If the tribe has a Tribal Emer-
gency Response Commission
(TERC) and/or working with a
Local Emergency Planning Com-
mittee (LEPC).

•	If facilities are reporting under
EPCRA, RMP, SPCC/FRP, etc.;

•	If the tribe has any emergency
plan in place and is able to imple-
ment it; and

•	What the tribe's priorities are for
potential risks and hazards
(including natural disasters,
chemical and oil releases, and
terrorist acts).

Phase II of the outreach is to pro-
vide specific technical assistance
and training to certain tribal govern-
ments based on their priorities.

REPORT

Need to Report a Possible
Environmental Violation?
Fill out the form at
www. e pa. q 0 v/ti ps/

Page 3


-------
Planning, Prevention, and Preparedness Newsletter

January 2011

Emergency Planning 8c Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA)
Bradley Miller — 303-312-6483 / miller.bradley@epa.gov

New CAMEO and Tier II Enhancements

New versions of CAMEO and
Tier2 Submit are now available.

Download CAMEO 2.2 at

http://www.epa. gov/ oem/content/cameo/cameo .htm

Download Tier2 Submit 2010 at

http://www.epa.gov/osweroel/conteiit/epcra/tier2.htm

If you're upgrading to CAMEO 2.2 from a pre-
vious version of CAMEO, follow the instruc-
tions in the guidance document (provided on the
download page) to ensure that you don't lose
your current data.

What's changed in CAMEO 2.2?

•	Added a New Record button to the toolbar in
all modules

•	Added a lat/long check in the Facilities mod-
ule (CAMEO compares the lat/long values
against a bounding box area that approximates
the area of the county listed on the facility
record's street address)

•	Added ability to link to documents within the Resources module (similar to
site plans in the Facilities and Special Locations modules)

•	Enhanced search capabilities in the Resources module

•	Updated to allow import of Tier2 Submit 2010 files

•	Fixed minor bugs

What's changed in Tier2 Submit 2010?

•	Updated state-specific fields

•	Fixed minor bugs

EPA Adds 16 Chemicals to TRI List

EPA is adding 16 chemicals to the list of toxic chemicals subject to reporting
under section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know
Act (EPCRA) of 1986 and section 6607 of the Pollution Prevention Act of 1990
(PPA). These 16 chemicals have been classified by the National Toxicology
Program in their Report on Carcinogens as ' 'reasonably anticipated to be a hu-
man carcinogen." EPA has determined that these 16 chemicals meet the EP-
CRA section 313(d)(2)(B) criteria because they can reasonably be anticipated to
cause cancer in humans. For a list of these chemicals (Click here)

•kifk

REMEMBER

•k"k"k

Hazardous Chemical Inventory Forms (Tier I/Tier II) for 2010 are due to
your SERC, LEPC and fire department by March 1, 2011!

OIL SPILL PREVENTION/SPCC

Melissa Payan Coordinator 303-312-6511/payan.melissa@epa.gov

EPA Oil Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures Rule - What about Farmers?

As we've seen in the news lately, oil spills can cause a lot of damage to the enviromnent. While the BP spill in the
Gulf of Mexico is an extreme example, most people don't realize that it doesn't take a lot of oil to do significant damage. As little as
one gallon of oil can contaminate one million gallons, or more than three-acre feet, of water.

The purpose of EPA's Oil Spill Prevention, Control, and Countenneasure (SPCC) program is to prevent oil spills from damaging our
water, land and natural resources. By developing plans and taking basic precautions, farmers and livestock producers can avoid the
damage, costs, and headaches that can result from even a small release from their tanks.

One of the key provisions of the SPCC program is the development of a plan to prevent the release of oil products into waters of the
United States. Not every farm or livestock operation needs an SPCC plan. The rule requires facilities that store more than 1,320
gallons of oil or fuel in above ground containers (or more than 42,000 gallons in buried containers) to have an SPCC plan ~ if an
accidental release could reasonably be expected to discharge into waters of the U.S. For purposes of the rule, oil includes, but is not
limited to petroleum oils, fuel (gasoline, diesel, etc.), sludge, synthetic oils, oil refuse, and oil mixed with wastes other than dredged
spoil. Oil also includes animal fats, vegetable oils and fish oils.

Although the SPCC requirements have been in place since 1974, there is a renewed interest in the rule. In January 2010, rule
amendments become effective that are intended to make compliance simpler and easier for fanners and livestock producers. Under
these amendments, only containers with a capacity of 55 gallons or more are counted towards the 1,320 gallon threshold. Also,
containers located on separate parcels can be considered separately when calculating whether this threshold is met. Pesticide
containers and application equipment as well as residential heating oil tanks are exempted from the SPCC rule.

Another important change is the ability for farmers to self-certify. The amendments state that an SPCC plan can be self-certified if
the total oil storage capacity at a facility is less than 10,000 gallons. An easy-to-use template is available on EPA's website for those
eligible to self-certify, so long as no single container is larger than 5,000 gallons. If total farm storage capacity exceeds (Cont. Pg. 5)

Page 4


-------
Planning, Prevention, and Preparedness Newsletter	January 2011

EPA Oil Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures Rule (From pg 4)

10,000 gallons, the SPCC plan must be certified by a professional engineer. These new amendments provide for a compliance date of November
10, 2011, for facilities which were not in existence prior to August 16, 2002. Facilities in existence prior to August 16, 2002 that do not have an
SPCC plan in place are currently out of compliance and must prepare and implement a plan as soon as possible.

So what does an SPCC plan involve? To prepare or update a plan, fanners first need to identify the location and contents of containers holding oil
and the controls in place to prevent spills. Plans also should describe measures in place to prevent any potential spills from reaching water, and the
methods and resources available to contain and clean up spills. Plans should also include a list of emergency contacts and first responders.

SPCC plans should also detail spill prevention measures such as the use of suitable containers for the oil stored; information about contractors or
other local personnel that can help clean up an oil spill; overfill prevention mechanisms for tanks or containers; effective, properly sized secondary
containment for bulk storage containers; general secondary containment in places where fuel or oil is transferred; and periodic inspection and test-
ing of pipes and containers.

In case of a spill, the operator should follow the cleanup and response procedures in their plan and notify the National Response Center (1-800-424-
8802) of any discharge to waters of the U.S. Operators should also notify EPA directly if more than 1,000 gallons of oil is discharged to water in a
single event, or if more than 42 gallons of oil is spilled to water on two different occasions within any 12-month period.

EPA knows that fanners and livestock producers have a firsthand appreciation of the value of clean water. SPCC plans are an effective way to
minimize the likelihood of a spill and to ensure that any spills that do occur are contained before they can damage precious water resources.

EPA specialists are available to help fanners and livestock producers comply with the SPCC requirements. A number of workshops are being
planned in regional locations to explain the SPCC rule provisions in detail.

Additional resources are available to provide more information about the SPCC program.

A useful fact sheet for producers is available at www.epa. go v/osweroe 1 /docs/oil/spcc/spccfanns.pdf.

SPCC plan template can be found at www.epa.gov/oem/content/spcc/tierltemp.htm.

Hie SPCC rule can be obtained at www.epa.gov/osweroel/content/spcc/.

Questions can be addressed to the EPA Ag Compliance Assistance Center at www.epa.gov/agriculture/ (888-663-2155) or the Oil Information
Center at www.epa.gov/superfund/contacts/infocenter (800-424-9346).

You may also call EPA Region 8 oil program staff at 800-227-8917. Melissa Payan (303-312-6511), Donna Inman (303-312-6201) or Cynthia
Peterson (303) 312-6879.

Oil Regulations Workshop Announcement for Watertown, SD:

In February EPA's Oil Program staff will conduct a free workshop in South Dakota on the oil pollution regulations and the requirements for a
Spill Prevention Control and Countenneasure (SPCC) Plan. SPCC plans must be prepared and implemented by facilities which store, process,
transfer, distribute, use, consume, drill, produce, gather, or refine oil or oil products as described in the Article. The workshop will be held on
February 17, 2011 from 1:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. This workshop will cover requirements for all SPCC regulated facilities and will include an update
on EPA's revisions to certain regulatory requirements subject to the SPCC rale.

If you have any questions related to this workshop please call 303-312-6801. Amendments to the SPCC rale were finalized on January 14,
2010. The SPCC rule was amended to provide increased clarity, to tailor requirements to particular industry sectors, and to streamline certain
requirements for facility owners or operators subject to the rule. Information regarding these amendments is available at this Web page: Oil Pol-
lution Prevention; Spill Prevention, Control, and Countenneasure Rule Requirements. We encourage workshop participants to review the on-line
documents prior to attending a workshop and to bring them to the workshop.

Location for SPCC Workshop:	REGISTRATION INFORMATION

Codington County Extension Complex This workshop is free of charge, but you must register to attend. To register you may complete
1910 West Kemp Avenue	the online registration form or call Jim Peterson at 303-312-6562 or David Lennon at (303) 312-6801

Watertown, SD 57201-3048	with your name, the name of your organization, your organization's address, and your daytime phone

number

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA)

The Office of Pipeline Safety is the Federal safety authority for the nation's 2.3 million miles of natural gas and hazardous liquid pipelines. Here
www.phmsa.dot.gov/about/agency. you can find information regarding pipeline regulations, proposed and final ralemakings, pipeline statistics,
Common Ground Alliance and One Call programs, request procedures under Freedom of Information Act guidelines, reports on major pipeline
accidents/incidents and conective action orders, pipeline mapping systems information, training and publications, and online library of Pipeline
Safety forms and public information files.

PHMSA recognizes the first element of facing a challenge is to prepare for it. Preparing involves many different
activities; planning, training, exercising, and enhancing capabilities.

Reaching out to emergency responders, hazardous materials, and pipeline industry stakeholders is one of PHMSA s
core goals to ensure these communities are fully primed to deal with any type of hazardous material or pipeline
incident. PHMSA provides technical expertise to industry and works closely with the response community to en-
sure the transportation system remains safe. Moving into the future, it is essential for PHMSA to continue to build
partnerships with you, the stakeholder, for the improvement of emergency response capabilities and continue to
enhance the safety of the hazardous materials transportation and energy pipeline supply system.

Hazardous Materials Trans-
portation and Pipeline Acci-
dents are to be reported di-
rectly to the 24-hour Na-
tional Response Center
(NRC): at 1-800-424-8802.
To reach the DOT's 24-hour
Crisis Management Center,
call 202-366-1863

Page 5


-------
Planning, Prevention, and Preparedness Newsletter

January 2011

Preparedness Unit Mission Statement:

We will increase EPA Region 8 preparedness through:

•	Planning, Training, Exercising, and developing outreach relations with federal agencies,
states, tribes, local organizations and the regulated community

•	Assisting in the development of EPA Region 8 preparedness planning and response capa-
bilities through the RSC, IMT, RRT, OP A, RMP, etc.

•	Working with facilities to reduce accidents and spills through education, inspections and
enforcement. To contact a member of our team:

See Organization chart attached to the sending email.

Acronym List
IMT Incident Management Team
OPA Oil Pollution Act
RRT Regional Response Team
RSC Response Support Corps
SPCC Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure

Emergencies

R&port oil or
chemical spills al

800-424-8802

More

1 (800) 424-8802

National
Response
Center

www.nrc.uscg.mil

Risk Management Program (RMP)

Bradley Miller—Coordinator303-312-6483/ miller.bradley@epa.goy

Need More info on the Risk Management Program (RMP)?

http://www.epa.gov/emergencies/nnp will be updated as new information becomes available. EPA
maintains numerous listservs to keep the public, state and local officials, and industry up to date,
including several that pertain to emergency management. You can sign up for our listserve to re-
ceive periodic updates: https://lists.epa.gov/read/all forums/subscribe?name=callcenter oswer

RMP Reporting Center

The Reporting Center can answer questions about software or installation problems. The RMP Reporting Center is available from
8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, for questions on the Risk Management Plan program: (703) 227-7650 (phone)
RMPRC@epacdx.net (e-mail)

Chemical Emergency Preparedness & Prevention Office (CEPPO) http://www.epa. gov/emergencies/index.htm
Compliance and Enforcement: http://www.epa. gov/compliance/index.html
Compliance Assistance: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/assistance/index.html

Call our hotline, the Superfund, TRI, EPCRA, RMP, and Oil Information Center (800) 424-9346 or (703) 412-9810 TDD (800)
553-7672 or (703) 412-3323 Mon-Thurs 10:00 am to 3:00 pmET (except Federal Holidays) or see

www.epa.gov/superfund/contacts/iiifocenter/index.h1m.

You can also call or write to:

U.S. EPA Region 8
1595 Wynkoop Street (8EPR-ER)

Denver, CO 80202-1129
800-227-8917
CO, MT, ND, SD, UT, and WY
To report an oil or chemical spill, call the National Response Center at (800) 424-8802.

This newsletter provides information on the EPA Risk Management Program, EPCRA, SPCC/FRP (Facility Response Plan) and
other issues relating to Accidental Release Prevention Requirements. The information should be used as a reference tool, not as
a definitive source of compliance information. Compliance regulations are published in 40 CFR Part 68 for CAA section 112(r)
Risk Management Program, 40 CFR Part 355/370for EPCRA, and 40 CFR Part 112.2 for SPCC/FRP.

Page 6


-------