Peer Review Ensures Sound
Science

Impact Cutting Edge
Research: Become a Peer

Reviewer

x-/EPA

United States
Environmental Protection
Agency

EPA conducts External Peer Reviews on applications
submitted in response to extramural research competitions.

External Peer Reviews provide independent expert technical
evaluation of the scientific merit of the proposed research
and ensure that it is based on sound science.

Applications must pass an External Peer Review to be
considered further for funding.

What Type of applications are Peer Reviewed?

Science to Achieve Results (STAR) Research Grants

Three to five year grants covering a range of health and
environmental topics.

STAR & Greater Research Opportunities (GRO)
Fellowships

GRO Undergraduate and STAR Graduate Fellowships for
science, engineering, and environmental study

Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Contracts

Innovative Research Contracts for small businesses to
develop new sustainable processes, methods, and products.

Find out more about the NCER's STAR
grant, STAR and GRO Fellowship, and SBIR
research competitions and our research re-
sults by visiting our website

h tti> :/A i'i n i'. ena. no v/n cer/

Here are just a few projects advanced by previous peer
reviewers:

STAR Childrens Environmental Research Grant

STAR researchers at the Columbia Center for Children's
Environmental Health have published results which
associate prenatal exposure to air pollutants called
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
(PAHs) with behavioral problems
in children.

STAR P3 Grant

UC Davis was awarded a P3 grant
to research the possibility of creating plastics from sewage
wastewater The team successfully started a company
called Micromidas which has since ¦¦
leveraged millions in venture capital to ny	\

build a pilot plant. The company now , I
employs more than 20 people.

STAR Fellow

1. Dr. Johnson Pyrtle, awarded an EPA STAR fellowship
in 1997, has since received 2 presidential awards: The
Presidential Award for Excellence in Science,
Mathematics and Engineering Mentoring and

2. The Presidential Award for Excellence in !
Mathematics and Science Teaching. Dr. Pyrtle '
is currently an Assistant Professor of Chemical
Oceanography at the the College of Marine Science in St.
Petersburg Florida.

SBIR Contract

Ecovative Design, is an enviromnental start-up company
that developed a product to replace synthetic i
foams used in packaging and construction by
bonding agricultural byproducts like rice and
cottonseed hulls, together using mushroom |
roots.

Information
Ne w Re

Peer Review Division

National Center for Environmental Research (NCER)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency


-------
Benefits of Serving as a Peer How to Become an NCER jhe pEER Review Process
Reviewer	Peer Reviewer

•	Expand your knowledge of cutting-edge,
multi-disciplinary EPA research

•	Expand your networks

•	Collaborate with other peer reviewers

•	Recommend colleagues who can also benefit

•	Move into new research areas

•	Join new research communities

•	Gain a better
understanding
of how EPA's
grant and
peer review
processes work

•	Leam how to
improve the
quality of your
own

applications

•	Give feedback to improve future RFAs

•	Improve research and results in the scientific
community

•	We pay a professional services fee and travel ex-
penses for your services as a Peer Reviewer.

•	We welcome qualified reviewers from academic,
government, NGO, non-profit, and business sectors

•	We encourage you to share this information with
other colleagues who might be interested in serving as
a peer reviewer.

PRD finds qualified reviewers through a variety of sources,
including the NCER database, known as Peer Reviewer
Infonnation System (PRIS) (this is an internal database not
open to the public).

Technical experts may nominate themselves for
inclusion in PRIS by sending an e-mail request
including a brief CV to Benjamin Packard:

packard.benjamin(a)epa.gov

If you are selected to be a reviewer, you will be required
to immediately obtain a Data Universal Number System
(DUNS) Number and register in System for Award
Management (SAM).

Find out more about Peer Review by visiting our
website:

h ttn://> n n r. en a , n o v/n cer/veerre i 7ei i'

Have a question about peer review? Leave us a message
at:

httn://wwn\erta.uov/ncer/contact us.html

1.	We read the applications and detennine the expertise
need for peer review.

2.	We then seek out reviewers with appropriate expertise
using in-house & commercial databases, internet
searches and other sources.

3.	After compiling a final list of reviewers, we arrange
for procurement of the reviewers' service. Reviewers
are processed to receive a professional services fee and
reimbursement of travel expenses.

4.	Approximately 1 month before the peer review
meeting, we send reviewers all the applications
received and a list of applications that they are
specifically to review.

5.	Using review criteria, each reviewer prepares an
individual evaluation of the applications assigned and
provides a score for those applications.

6.	Reviewers attend peer review meetings, typically in the
Washington, D.C. area, and discuss the applications.

7.	We develop summaries from the reviewers' individual
comments and include a final score for each
application.

8.	We send the applicants their review summary along
with their final score.

9.	We forward highly scored applications for internal
review and funding consideration.

10.	We arrange for successful and timely reimbursement of
reviewer expenses after service is rendered.


-------