Final
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown Upstream Area
Site Characterization Report
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Great Lakes Architect-Engineer Services
Contract: EP-R5-11-10
Preparedfor
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 5
77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Illinois 60604-3507
Prepared by
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology*
5918 Meridian Boulevard, Suite 4
Brighton, Michigan 48116
June 2019
Revision: 00
EA Project No. 62561.36
* EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC is affiliated with EA Engineering, Science, and Technology,
Inc., PBC who does business as EA Science and Technology in the State of Michigan.
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page iii
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
CONTENTS
Page
LIST OF TABLES vi
LIST OF FIGURES vii
LIST 01 ACRONYMS AM) ABBREVIATIONS x
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
ES. 1 SEDIMENT CHEMISTRY RESULTS 1
ES.2 EQUILIBRIUM PARTITIONING SEDIMENT BENCHMARK TOXICITY
UNITS AND PROBABLE EFFECTS CONCENTRATION QUOTIENTS 5
ES. 3 SPATIAL ANALYSIS 6
ES.4 CONCLUSIONS 7
1. INTRODUCTION 1-1
1.1 WORK SCOPE AM) OBJECTIVES 1-1
1.1.1 Proj ect Obj ectives 1-1
1.1.2 Obj ectives of the Site Characterization Report 1-1
1.2 SITE LOCATION AM) HISTORY 1-1
2. HARBORTOWN UPSTREAM AREA SITE INVESTIGATION 2-1
2.1 SAMPLING PROGRAM DESIGN AND RATIONALE 2-1
2.1.1 Sample Locations 2-1
2.1.2 Number of Samples 2-1
2.2 NAVIGATION AND SURVEY 2-2
2.3 SEDIMENT SAMPLING 2-2
2.3.1 Vibracore Sampling 2-2
2.3.2 Ponar Grab Sampling 2-3
2.3.3 Sediment Core Processing 2-3
2.4 ANALYTICAL PROGRAM 2-4
2.5 SAMPLE HANDLING, CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY, AND QUALITY
ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL 2-4
2.5.1 Sample Handling, Chain-of-Custody, and Documentation 2-4
2.5.2 Quality Control 2-5
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page iv
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
2.6 DECONTAMINATION 2-5
2.7 INVESTIGATION-DERIVED WASTE 2-6
2.8 DEVIATIONS FROM THE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN AND
FIELD SAMPLING PLAN 2-6
2.8.1 Sampling Locations 2-6
2.8.2 Sample Recovery 2-7
2.8.3 Sample Processing and Analytical Program 2-7
3. RESULTS 3-1
3.1 DATA EVALUATION 3-1
3.1.1 Comparison to Sediment Quality Guidelines 3-1
3.1.2 Calculation of Total Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Total
Polychlorinated Biphenyls 3-2
3.1.3 Ratio of Simultaneously Extracted Metals to Acid Volatile Sulfide 3-2
3.1.4 Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmark Toxic Units 3-3
3.1.5 Probable Effects Concentration Quotients 3-3
3.2 RESULTS FROM THE HARBORTOWN UPSTREAM AREA SEDIMENT
INVESTIGATION 3-4
3.2.1 Sample Recovery 3-4
3.2.2 Lithology 3-4
Bulk Sediment Results 3-5
3.2.2.1 Grain Size, Particle Size, and Density 3-6
3.2.2.2 Polychlorinated Biphenyl Aroclors 3-6
3.2.2.3 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons 3-7
3.2.2.4 Total Organic Carbon 3-7
3.2.2.5 Metals 3-7
3.2.2.6 Ratio of Simultaneously Extracted Metals to Acid Volatile
Sulfide 3-12
3.2.2.7 Petroleum Hydrocarbons 3-12
3.2.2.8 Cyanide 3-14
4. EQUILIBRIUM PARTITIONING SEDIMENT BENCHMARKS 4-1
4.1 POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS 4-1
4.2 METALS 4-2
5. PROBABLE EFFECTS CONCENTRATION QUOTIENTS 5-1
6. SPATIAL ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE HOT SPOTS WITHIN THE HARBORTOWN
UPSTREAM AREA 6-1
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page v
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
6.1 METHODOLOGY 6-1
6.2 MODEL RESULTS FOR ALL PROBABLE EFFECT CONCENTRATION
CONSTITUENTS IN THE HARBORTOWN UPSTREAM AREA 6-1
6.3 MODEL RESULTS FOR POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBON
EQUILIBRIUM PARTITIONING SEDIMENT BENCHMARK TOXIC UNITS
FOR THE HARBORTOWN UPSTREAM AREA 6-3
6.3.1 Spatial Analysis for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Equilibrium
Partitioning Sediment Benchmark Toxic Units in Harbortown Upstream
Area 6-3
6.4 MODEL RESULTS FOR PROBABLE EFFECTS CONCENTRATION
QUOTIENTS FOR THE HARBORTOWN UPSTREAM AREA 6-4
6.4.1 Spatial Analysis for Probable Effects Concentration Quotients in the
Harbortown Upstream Area 6-4
6.5 CLASSIFICATION OF HOT SPOTS BASED ON ALL KRIGING RESULTS IN
THE HARBORTOWN UPSTREAM AREA 6-4
6.5.1 Level 1 Hot Spots 6-5
6.5.2 Level 2 Hot Spots 6-6
6.5.2.1 Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 1 6-6
6.5.2.2 Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 3 6-7
6.5.2.3 Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 4 6-7
6.5.3 Level 3 Hot Spots Error! Bookmark not defined.
6.5.3.1 Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 2 6-8
6.5.3.2 Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 5 6-9
6.6 COMPARISON OF HARBORTOWN UPSTREAM AREA HOT SPOTS WITH
ASSESSMENTS FOR OTHER SECTIONS OF THE DETROIT RIVER AREA
OF CONCERN 6-9
7. CONCLUSIONS 7-1
8. REFERENCES 8-1
APPENDIX A: FIELD LOGBOOKS AND DATA COLLECTION FORMS
APPENDIX B: LITHOLOGIC CORE LOGS
APPENDIX C: PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
APPENDIX D: PARTICLE SIZE GRAPHS
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
LIST OF TABLES
Number Title
2-1 Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization Core Sample Coordinates and
Field Notes
2-2 Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization Surface Sample Coordinates
and Description
2-3 Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization Core Data
2-4 Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization Actual Analytical Program
3-1 Summary of Exceedances, HT
3-2 Sediment Results for Grain Size, HT
3-3 Sediment Results for PCB Aroclors, HT
3-4 Sediment Results for PAHs, HT
3-5 Sediment Results for Metals and TOC, HT
3-6 Sediment Results for SEM/AVS, HT
3-7 Sediment Results for TPHs, HT
3-8 Sediment Results for Cyanide, HT
4-1 ESBTUs for PAHs, HT
4-2 ESBTUs for SEM/AVS Metals, HT
5-1 PEC-Qs, HT
6-1 Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot PECs
6-2 Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot PAH ESBTUs
6-3 Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot PEC-Qs
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page vii
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
LIST OF FIGURES
Number Title
1-1 Proj ect Site Location
1-2 Harbortown Upstream Area
1-3 Combined Sewer Overflows and Industrial Outfalls in the Harbortown Upstream
Area
2-1 Sample Locations
3-1 Total PCB Aroclor (ND = 0) Concentrations (|_ig/kg) - Harbortown Upstream
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-2 Total 17 PAHs (ND = V2 RL) Concentrations (|j,g/kg)- Harbortown Upstream
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-3 Arsenic Concentrations (mg/kg) - Harbortown Upstream Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
3-4 Cadmium Concentrations (mg/kg) - Harbortown Upstream Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
3-5 Chromium Concentrations (mg/kg) - Harbortown Upstream Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
3-6 Copper Concentrations (mg/kg) - Harbortown Upstream Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
3-7 Iron Concentrations (mg/kg) - Harbortown Upstream Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
3-8 Lead Concentrations (mg/kg) - Harbortown Upstream Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
3-9 Mercury Concentrations (mg/kg) - Harbortown Upstream Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
3-10 Nickel Concentrations (mg/kg) - Harbortown Upstream Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
3-11 Silver Concentrations (mg/kg) - Harbortown Upstream Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page viii
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
3-12 Zinc Concentrations (mg/kg) - Harbortown Upstream Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
3-13 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (£DRO+ORO) (mg/kg) - Harbortown Upstream
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-14 Diesel Range Organics (mg/kg) - Harbortown Upstream Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
3-15 Oil Range Organics (mg/kg) - Harbortown Upstream Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
4-1 ESBTUs for PAHs - Harbortown Upstream Assessment of Contaminated
Sediments
5-1 PEC-Qs - Harbortown Upstream Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
6-1 Spatial Analysis for All Constituents - Harbortown Upstream Assessment of
Contaminated Sediment Overview
6-2 Spatial Analysis for All Constituents- Harbortown Upstream Assessment of
Contaminated Sediment
6-3 Spatial Analysis for PAH ESBTUs - Harbortown Upstream Assessment of
Contaminated Sediment
6-4 Spatial Analysis for Mean PEC-Qs - Harbortown Upstream Assessment of
Contaminated Sediment
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page ix
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
This page intentionally left blank
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
°c
Degree Celsius
l-ig/kg
Microgram(s) per kilogram
|imol
Micromole(s)
|iinol/goc
Micromole(s) per gram organic carbon
AOC
Area of Concern
APTIM
APTIM Federal Services, LLCAVS Acid volatile sulfide
COC
Contaminant of concern
CSO
Combined sewer overflow
cy
Cubic yard(s)
DRO
Diesel range organics
EA
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC and Its Affiliate
EA Science and Technology
EGLE
Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy
EPA
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
ESB
Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmarks
ESBTU
Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmarks Toxicity Unit
FD
Field duplicate
foe
Fraction of organic carbon in sediment
FSP
Field Sampling Plan
ft
Foot (feet)
GLNPO
Great Lakes National Program Office
GPS
Global Positioning System
Koc
Sediment organic carbon/water partition coefficient
Kow
Octanol-water partition coefficient
LRROC
Lower Rouge River Old Channel
MDNR
Michigan Department of Natural Resources
mg/kg
Milligram(s) per kilogram
MS
Matrix spike
MSD
Matrix spike duplicate
ND
Not detected or non-detect
ORO
Oil range organics
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
Page x
June 2019
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
Page xi
June 2019
PAH
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
PCB
Poly chlorinated biphenyl
PEC
Probable effects concentration
PEC-Q
Probable effects concentration quotient
PRG
Preliminary remediation goal
QAPP
Quality Assurance Project Plan
RAP
Remedial Action Plan
RCRA
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
RL
Reporting limit
RTK
Real time kinematic
SCBA
Sediment Contaminant Bioavailability Alliance
SEM
Simultaneously extracted metals
SOP
Standard operating procedure
SQG
Sediment Quality Guideline
SSRSL
Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
TEC
Threshold effects concentration
TOC
Total organic carbon
TPH
Total petroleum hydrocarbons (sum of ORO and DRO)
WAD
Weak acid dissociable
WDNR
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page ES-1
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report presents the characterization of contaminated sediments for the Harbortown
Upstream Area (site), located within the Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC), Detroit,
Michigan. This work was conducted by EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology (EA) for the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency's (EPA's) Great Lakes National Program Office (GLNPO) in accordance with the
Quality Assurance Project Plan and Field Sampling Plan for the Harbortown Upstream Area Site
Characterization, Detroit River AOC, Detroit, Michigan (EA 2018), finalized in October 2018.
To address the delisting criteria and allow for the eventual removal of the Degradation of
Benthos beneficial use impairment, EPA's GLNPO, Michigan Department of Environmental
Quality, Detroit River Public Advisory Committee, and Friends of Detroit River initiated an
effort in 2012 to define the "known contaminated sediment sites" in the Detroit River. The
partnership conducted a content analysis of a number of contaminant studies and established six
sediment target sites. The Harbortown Upstream Area is an extension of the Harbortown
sediment site, which is one of the six target areas.
The purpose of this field investigation was to determine the nature and extent of chemical
contamination in the areas of soft sediment deposition. This Site Characterization Report
summarizes the findings from the field investigation, including data tables and maps, data
interpretations, and conclusions of the investigation. The overall objective of this report is to
identify priority areas within the Harbortown Upstream site at which remediation efforts might
be warranted or where further investigation should be conducted. This Executive Summary
provides a synopsis of the findings of the Site Characterization Report. Details on the site
background and methodology, and further detail on the findings and conclusions are presented in
Chapters 1 through 8 of the report.
ES.l SEDIMENT CHEMISTRY RESULTS
Sampling was conducted to delineate the nature and extent of sediment contamination in the
Harbortown Upstream Area of the Detroit River AOC. Thirty samples from locations HT18-01
through HT18-32 were collected from the surface interval to a depth of ten feet. Sampling
extended from upstream location HT 18-01, located southeast of the Keelson Road Canal, to
location HT18-30, the furthest downstream location, just off the shore of Gabriel Richard Park
east of the MacArthur Bridge. Two locations (HT18-31 and -32) were located in the center of
the channel between Belle Isle and US mainland, and HT 18-03 was located within Connor Creek
by the request of EPA.
Constituent concentrations detected in sediment samples were compared to various sediment
quality metrics including threshold effects concentrations (TECs), probable effects
concentrations (PECs), Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmark Toxicity Units (ESBTUs),
Probable Effects Concentration Quotients (PEC-Qs), and Sample-Specific Risk Screening Levels
(SSRSLs). TECs typically represent concentrations below which adverse biological effects are
unlikely to be observed, while PECs typically represent concentrations above which adverse
effects are likely to be observed (MacDonald et al. 2000). Concentrations that are between the
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page ES-2
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
TEC and PEC represent the concentrations at which adverse biological effects occasionally
occur. Total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) (diesel range organics [DRO] + oil range organics
[ORO]) results were compared to SSRSLs as a PEC has not been developed for DRO and ORO.
ESBTUs were calculated to estimate whether there is potential ecological risk associated with
exposure to pore water that is in equilibrium with a measured concentration of the contaminant
in the sediment. PEC-Qs are used to evaluate the combined effects of chemical mixtures on the
toxicity of sediments to benthic organisms against recommended benchmarks including mean
PEC quotients of 0.1, 0.5, 1, and 5 (Ingersoll et al. 2001).
Bulk Chemistry
Total polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) concentrations (not detected [ND]=0) exceeded the TEC
in five of the 29 surface grab samples in the Harbortown Upstream Area and no concentrations
exceeded the PEC. In the core samples, total PCB concentrations exceeding the PEC were
detected in at least one depth interval at four locations. The maximum total PCB concentration
was detected at HT18-06.
For total 17 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) (ND=l/2 reporting limit [RL]), 22 surface
grab samples had a maximum concentration between the TEC and PEC and no samples exceeded
the PEC. In the core samples, 15 locations had a maximum total 17 PAHs concentration in at
least one depth interval that was between the TEC and PEC; two locations had a maximum total
17 PAHs concentration in at least one depth interval that was between one and two times greater
than the PEC; and four locations had a maximum total 17 PAHs concentration in at least one
depth interval that exceeded three times the PEC. The maximum total 17 PAHs concentration in
a surface sample and a subsurface sample were both detected at HT 18-25.
For arsenic, two surface grab samples had a maximum concentration between the TEC and PEC
and no samples exceeded the PEC. In the core samples, 12 locations had a maximum arsenic
concentration in at least one depth interval that was between the TEC and PEC. One location
had a maximum arsenic concentration in at least one depth interval that was between one and
two times greater than the PEC. The maximum total arsenic concentrations in surface samples
were detected at HT18-01 and HT18-05, and the maximum subsurface sample concentration was
detected at HT 18-08.
For cadmium, six surface grab samples had a maximum concentration that was between the TEC
and PEC and one surface grab sample had a maximum cadmium concentration between one and
two times greater than the PEC. In the core samples, five locations had a maximum cadmium
concentration in at least one depth interval that was between the TEC and PEC. Seven locations
had a maximum cadmium concentration in at least one depth interval that was one to two times
greater than the PEC; and four locations had a maximum cadmium concentration in at least one
depth interval that exceeded three times the PEC. The maximum cadmium concentrations in a
surface grab sample and a subsurface were detected at HT 18-03.
For copper, 17 surface grab samples had a maximum concentration that was between the TEC
and PEC and no surface samples had maximum concentrations exceeding the PEC. In the core
Harbortown Upstream Area Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
Page ES-3
June 2019
samples, 12 locations had a maximum copper concentration in at least one depth interval that
was between the TEC and PEC. Five locations had a maximum copper concentration in at least
one depth interval that was between one and two times greater than the PEC, and one location
had a maximum copper concentration in at least one depth interval that exceeded two times the
PEC. The maximum surface grab sample copper concentration was detected at HT18-03 and
maximum subsurface concentration was detected at HT18-18.
For iron, 11 surface grab samples had a maximum concentration that was between the TEC and
PEC and no surface grab samples had maximum iron concentrations that exceeded the PEC. In
the core samples, 15 locations had a maximum iron concentration in at least one depth interval
that was between the TEC and PEC, and no subsurface samples had maximum iron
concentrations that exceeded the PEC. The maximum surface grab sample iron concentration
was detected at HT18-30 and maximum subsurface concentration was detected at HT18-09.
For lead, 15 surface grab samples had a maximum lead concentration that was between the TEC
and PEC and one surface grab sample had a maximum lead concentration that exceeded two
times the PEC. In the core samples, eight locations had a maximum lead concentration in at least
one depth interval that was between the TEC and PEC. Eight locations had a maximum lead
concentration in at least one depth interval that was one to two times greater than the PEC; and
five locations had a maximum lead concentration in at least one depth interval that exceeded
three times the PEC. The maximum surface grab sample lead concentration was detected at
HT18-16 and the maximum subsurface concentration was detected at HT18-19.
For mercury, four surface grab samples had a maximum mercury concentration that was between
the TEC and PEC. One surface grab sample had a maximum mercury concentration that was
between one and two times greater that the PEC; and one surface grab sample had a maximum
mercury concentration that exceeded two times the PEC. In the core samples, ten locations had a
maximum mercury concentration in at least one depth interval that was between the TEC and
PEC. Four locations had a maximum mercury concentration in at least one depth interval that
was greater than the PEC; and three locations had a maximum mercury concentration in at least
one depth interval that exceeded three times the PEC. The maximum surface grab sample
mercury concentration was detected at HT18-32 and the maximum subsurface concentration was
detected HT18-18.
For nickel, fifteen surface grab samples had a maximum nickel concentration that was between
the TEC and PEC and two surface grab samples had a maximum nickel concentration that was
between one and two times greater that the PEC. In the core samples, 13 locations had a
maximum nickel concentration in at least one depth interval that was between the TEC and PEC.
Seven locations had a maximum nickel concentration in at least one depth interval that was
between one and two times greater than the PEC and one location had a maximum nickel
concentration in at least one depth interval that exceeded two times the PEC. The maximum
surface grab sample nickel concentration and subsurface sample nickel concentration were both
found at location HT18-03.
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page ES-4
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
For silver, none of the surface grab sample silver concentrations exceeded the TEC. In the core
samples, two locations had a maximum silver concentration in at least one depth interval that
was between the TEC and PEC. Four locations had a maximum silver concentration in at least
one depth interval that was between one and two times greater than the PEC; and one location
had a maximum nickel concentration in at least one depth interval that was between two and
three times greater than the PEC. The maximum surface grab sample silver concentration and
subsurface silver concentration were both found at location at HT18-03.
For zinc, 14 surface grab samples had a maximum zinc concentration that was between the TEC
and PEC and one surface grab sample had a maximum nickel concentration that was between
one and two times greater that the PEC. In the core samples, three locations had a maximum
zinc concentration in at least one depth interval that was between the TEC and PEC. Nine
locations had a maximum zinc concentration in at least one depth interval that was between one
and two times greater than the PEC and one location had a maximum zinc concentration in at
least one depth interval that exceeded two times the PEC. The maximum surface grab sample
zinc concentration and subsurface sample zinc concentration were both found at location
HT18-03.
The ratio of simultaneously extracted metals (SEM) to acid volatile sulfide (AVS) was calculated
for all surface grab samples. Three samples had an SEM/AVS ratio greater than or equal to one
(HT18-10, -17, and -19). This indicates that metals may be bioavailable and there is potential for
toxicity to benthic organisms.
The highest concentration of DRO (C10-C20) was detected in the surface grab sample from
location HT18-03 (930 milligrams per kilogram [mg/kg]). The highest concentration of ORO
(C20-C36) was also detected in the surface grab sample from HT18-03 (1,300 mg/kg). DRO (C10-
C20) and ORO (C20-C36) concentrations were summed (by location) to create a TPH
concentration (TPH [DRO+ORO]) for each location. DRO and ORO results were compared to
SSRSLs as TEC and PECs have not been developed for TPH (DRO + ORO). Twelve locations
had DRO concentrations exceeding the SSRSL. Three locations had DRO concentrations that
were between three and four times the respective SSRL; four locations had DRO concentrations
that were between two and three times the respective SSRL; and five locations had DRO
concentrations that were between one and two times the respective SSRL. Nine locations had
ORO concentrations exceeding the SSRSL. Five locations had DRO concentrations that were
between two and three times the respective SSRL and four locations had DRO concentrations
that were between one and two times the respective SSRL.
There were no locations with TPH values greater than 5,000 mg/kg; HT18-03 was the only
location with a TPH (DRO+ORO) value between 1,000 and 5,000 mg/kg; 21 locations had TPH
values between 100 and 1,000 mg/kg; and seven locations had a TPH value less than 100 mg/kg.
For cyanide, five samples had concentrations that exceeded the EPA Region 5 Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) screening value for weak acid dissociable (WAD)
cyanide at 0.1 mg/kg, and three samples had concentrations that exceeded the EPA Region 5
RCRA screening value for total cyanide at 0.1 mg/kg. The maximum WAD cyanide
Harbortown Upstream Area Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page ES-5
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
concentration was detected at location HT18-03 and the maximum total cyanide concentration
was detected at HT18-06.
ES.2 EQUILIBRIUM PARTITIONING SEDIMENT BENCHMARK TOXICITY
UNITS AND PROBABLE EFFECTS CONCENTRATION QUOTIENTS
ESBTUs were calculated to estimate whether there is potential for ecological risk associated with
exposure to pore water that is in equilibrium with a measured concentration of contaminant in
the sediment.
Typically, a PAH ESBTU less than or equal to 1 indicates that benthic organisms are not
expected to be harmed by contamination present in the sediments (EPA 2003a). The samples
with PAH ESBTUs greater than 1 may be toxic to aquatic life. In the Harbortown Upstream
area, three surface grab sample locations had PAH ESBTU between 1 and 7.5, and all the
remaining surface grab sample locations had PAH ESBTU values that were less than 1. In the
core samples, 18 locations had a subsurface sample PAH ESBTU greater than 1 in at least one
core depth interval. At HT18-19, the maximum PAH ESBTU value was greater than 10 in at
least one subsurface depth interval; and at 17 locations, the maximum PAH ESBTU value was
between 1 and 7.5 in at least one depth interval.
ESBTU results for metals did not exceed 130 micromoles per organic compound (|imol/goc) in
any surface grab samples in the Harbortown Upstream Area.
PEC-Qs are used to evaluate the combined effects of chemical mixtures on the toxicity of
sediments to benthic organisms against recommended benchmarks including mean PEC
quotients of 0.1, 0.5, 1, and 5 (Ingersoll et al. 2001). Consensus-based freshwater sediment
quality guidelines (SQGs) are used to calculate concentration quotients (or hazard quotients),
defined as measured sediment concentrations divided by the specific SQG for that particular
chemical or metal. The principle of PEC-Qs is to calculate the geometric mean of all quotients
for a particular sediment sample, including those for metals, PAHs, and PCBs.
Ingersoll et al. demonstrated a relationship between the mean PEC-Q and sediment toxicity.
This work showed that when the geometric mean PEC-Q was regressed with the percent toxicity
found in a sample (typically growth or mortality), and the geometric mean of the PEC-Qs was
approximately 1, between 30 and 50 percent of the organisms showed a toxic effect. This result
implied that between 50 and 70 percent of the organisms should not show an effect when the
PEC-Q is 1. The proportion of organisms that showed a toxic effect was in the range of 6 to
35 percent when the geometric mean of the PEC-Q of 0.5 was used, meaning that between 65
and 94 percent of organisms would not be expected to show a toxic effect when the PEC-Q was
0.5 (Ingersoll et. al. 2001).
A single PEC-Q was determined for each sediment sample (determined by the mean PEC-Q) to
provide an overall measure of chemical contamination and to support an evaluation of the
combined potential effects of multiple constituents in the sediment collected from the site (EPA
2000). The mean PEC-Qs in the Harbortown Upstream area ranged from 0.03 to 3.41. The
Harbortown Upstream Area Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page ES-6
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
mean PEC-Q for each sediment sample was compared to benchmarks of 0.5, 1, and 5. In the
surface grab samples, all the locations had mean PEC-Q values between 0 and 0.5. In the core
samples, eight locations had a PEC-Q in at least one depth interval that was between one and
five; five locations had a maximum PEC-Q value in at least one depth interval that was between
0.5 and 1; and the remaining locations had subsurface samples with PEC-Q values between 0 and
0.5.
ES.3 SPATIAL ANALYSIS
To determine the location of hot spots within the Harbortown Upstream Area, all individual
constituents with concentrations exceeding their respective PEC in sediment samples, calculated
PAH ESBTUs, and the calculated PEC-Qs were spatially interpolated using the kriging method.
Although ESBTUs were also calculated for metals, these data were not included in the model
inputs for the spatial analysis because only three results exceeded the relevant thresholds and
these results occurred within the hot spots that were otherwise identified.
Determination of hot spots allows priority areas to be targeted for further investigation or
remediation. Five hot spots in the study area where identified where one or more analytes were
present at concentrations exceeding the PEC. The five identified hot spot areas were prioritized
for further investigation and potential remediation efforts by taking into consideration the results
of the spatial analysis of PAH ESBTUs and PEC-Qs.
Hot spots were categorized as Levels 1, 2, or 3, consistent with previous characterizations in the
Detroit River AOC. Level 1 hot spots are recognized as those having the highest impact, Level 2
the impact is lower, and Level 3 hot spots are identified as having the lowest impact and lowest
priority for further investigation. To be considered Level 1, hot spots must have a contaminant
result that is equal to or greater than three times the respective PEC, a PEC-Q value equal to or
greater than 5, or an ESBTU equal to or greater than 7.5. To be considered Level 2, hot spots
must have a contaminant result that is equal to or greater than three times the respective PEC, a
PEC-Q value equal to or greater than 1, or an ESBTU equal to or greater than 7.5. To be
considered Level 3, hot spots must have a contaminant result that is equal to or greater than three
times the respective PEC, a PEC-Q value equal to or greater than 0.5, or an ESBTU equal to or
greater than 1.
Harbortown Upstream Hot Spots 1,3, and 4 each have at least one contaminant of concern
(COC) result that is equal to or greater than three times the respective PEC and PEC-Q values
greater than 1, therefore, meeting the Level 2 criteria. Harbortown Upstream Hot Spots 2 and 5
each have at least one contaminant of concern (COC) result that is equal to or greater than three
times the respective PEC, PEC-Q values greater than 0.5, and ESBTU values greater than 1,
therefore, meeting the Level 3 criteria.
Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 1 contains seven sample locations (HT18-03, -04, -05, -06, -07,
-08, and -09). The COCs for this hot spot area include total PCBs, total 17 PAHs, and nine
metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, silver, and zinc). The
predominant constituents contributing to the elevated concentrations are total PCBs (HT18-03
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page ES-7
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
and -06), total 17 PAHs (HT18-08), cadmium (HT18-03 and 07), and lead (HT18-03, -05, and -
06), which all exceed three times the PEC. Five sample locations in Hot Spot 1 had PAH
ESBTUs between 1 and 7.5. All seven sample locations had metal ESBTUs less than 130
|imol/goc. Four sample locations in Hot Spot 1 had PEC-Q values between one and five, and one
sample location had PEC-Q values between 0.5 and 1.
Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 2 contains three sample locations (HT18-12, -13, and -14). The
COCs for this hot spot area include total 17 PAHs and five metals (cadmium, copper, lead,
nickel, and zinc). The predominant constituent contributing to the elevated concentrations is
cadmium (HT18-13), which exceeded three times the PEC. All of the sample locations in Hot
Spot 2 have PAH ESBTUs between 1 and 7.5 and all of the sample locations have metal
ESBTUs less than 130 |imol/goc. Two sample locations have PEC-Q values between 0.5 and 1.
Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 3 contains five locations (HT18-16, -18, -19, -20, and -21). The
COCs for this hot spot area include total 17 PAHs and six metals (cadmium, copper, lead,
mercury, silver, and zinc). The predominant constituents contributing to the elevated
concentrations are total 17 PAHs, lead, and mercury, which all exceed three times the PEC in
HT18-18 and -19. One sample location (HT18-20) in Hot Spot 3 had PAH ESBTUs between
1 and 7.5 and one sample location (HT18-19) had PAH ESBTUs exceeding 10. No sample
locations had metal ESBTUs greater than 130 |imol/goc and two sample locations had PEC-Q
values between one and five.
Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 4 contains two locations (HT18-24 and -25). The COCs for this
hot spot area include total 17 PAHs and six metals (cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, silver, and
zinc). The predominant constituents contributing to the elevated concentrations are total 17
PAHs, lead, and mercury, which all exceed three times the PEC in HT 18-25. HT 18-25 in Hot
Spot 4 had PAH ESBTUs between 1 and 7.5 and both sample locations had metal ESBTUs less
than 130 |imol/goc. HT 18-25 samples had a PEC-Q value between one and five.
Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 5 contains three locations (HT 18-28, -29, and -30). The COCs
for this hot spot area include total 17 PAHs and six metals (cadmium, copper, lead, mercury,
nickel, and zinc). The predominant constituent contributing to the elevated concentrations is
cadmium, which exceeds three times the PEC in HT18-30. All three sample locations in Hot
Spot 5 had PAH ESBTUs between 1 and 7.5 and each location had metal ESBTUs less than 130
|imol/goc. One sample in Hot Spot 5 had PEC-Q values between 0.5 and 1.
ES.4 CONCLUSIONS
Based on the data collected during the Harbortown Upstream Area sediment characterization,
there are no Level 1 high impact hot spots. The Level 2 hot spot areas with elevated
concentrations of constituents are: Harbortown Upstream Hot Spots 1, 3, and 4. These Level 2
hot spots have an estimated total of approximately 466,194 cubic yard (cy) of sediment with
constituent concentrations meeting the Level 2 criteria.
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
Page ES-8
June 2019
The Level 3 hot spot areas with elevated concentrations of constituents are: Harbortown
Upstream Hot Spots 2 and 5. These Level 3 hot spots have an estimated total of approximately
368,345 cubic yard (cy) of sediment with constituent concentrations meeting the Level 3 criteria.
The five hot spots identified in the Harbortown Upstream Area were determined to be Level 2 or
3 hot spots and should be considered for further investigation. Model results indicated that three
of these five areas have (Level 2) a large volume of sediment with elevated concentrations of
constituents exceeding three times respective PECs and elevated PAH ESBTUs and PEC-Qs.
There is a possible correlation of elevated concentrations being associated with soft sediment;
cores that were comprised primarily of fat, gray clay had fewer to no exceedances. Further
delineation of the extent of sediment with elevated concentrations of constituents is
recommended.
The modeling results for all constituents exceeding two or three times the PEC, the PAH
ESBTUs, and the PEC-Qs suggest that the hot spot areas should be considered for further
investigation and potential remediation within the Harbortown Upstream Area. However, it
should be noted that the limited number of samples results in significant uncertainty of the
volume of sediment with elevated concentrations of constituents in the hot spot areas.
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 1-1
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
1. INTRODUCTION
This report presents the characterization of contaminated sediments for the Harbortown
Upstream Area (site), located within the Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC), Detroit,
Michigan. (Figure 1-1). This work was conducted by EA Engineering, Science, and Technology,
(MI) PLC and its affiliate EA Science and Technology (EA) for the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency's (EPA's) Great Lakes National Program Office (GLNPO) in accordance
with the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) and Field Sampling Plan (FSP) for the
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization, Detroit River AOC, Detroit, Michigan, which
was finalized in October 2018 (EA 2018).
1.1 WORK SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES
1.1.1 Project Objectives
The purpose of the field investigation was to obtain the data necessary to define the spatial
(horizontal and vertical) nature and extent of chemical contamination in the areas of soft
sediment deposition—using the kriging method to model—in the Harbortown Upstream Area.
The primary objectives of the field investigation were collection and chemical and physical
analysis of surface and subsurface sediment from locations in the Harbortown Upstream Area to
characterize the contaminated sediments as a basis for identifying possible areas of focus, for
further evaluation and/or remediation, in the Detroit River.
1.1.2 Objectives of the Site Characterization Report
This Site Characterization Report summarizes the findings from the field investigation, including
data tables and maps, data interpretation, and conclusions of the investigation. The results of this
site characterization were evaluated to assess the sediment quality of the Harbortown Upstream
Area. The overall objectives of this report are to define the spatial extent of constituents and soft
sediment, develop a preliminary estimate of volume of sediment with elevated concentrations of
constituents, and identify priority areas within the Harbortown Upstream Area where
remediation efforts might be warranted.
1.2 SITE LOCATION AND HISTORY
The Detroit River is a 32-mile strait from Lake St. Clair to Lake Erie, forming the international
boundary between the Province of Ontario, Canada, and the State of Michigan (Michigan
Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy [EGLE] 2008). The Detroit River flows
in a southerly direction and connects the upper Great Lakes to Lake Erie. Although the Detroit
River has five tributaries, more than 95 percent of its total flow comes from Lake Huron via the
St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair (EPA 2015). The Detroit River AOC is 807 square miles and
includes the areas that drain directly to the river, the drainage area of its tributaries in Michigan
and Ontario (700 square miles of land), and a 107-square mile area of the City of Detroit
sewershed. The Detroit River AOC and the Harbortown Upstream project area are shown on
Figure 1-1. Approximately 75 percent of the total land area of the watershed is in Michigan
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 1-2
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
(607.7 square miles) (MDNR1996). The mean discharge of the Detroit River into Lake Erie is
185,000 cubic feet (ft) per second. Its velocity is 1-3 ft per second, and the average time for
water to pass through the river is approximately 21 hours. The project location includes the
Harbortown Upstream Area, which is one of six target areas in the Detroit River AOC. The
Harbortown Upstream Area is an approximately 3-mile stretch of the upper Detroit River
beginning at AB Ford Park and extending to the MacArthur Bridge to Belle Isle. This area is
upstream and contiguous with the Detroit River AOC Harbortown Upstream target sediment site
(Figure 1-2). Within the Harbortown Upstream Area, there are 10 known combined sewer
overflows (CSOs) (Figure 1-3); further details are provided in Section 3.2.
The Detroit River has a past and present use as an industrial and drinking water source. Very
little historical information exists documenting the nature and extent of contamination. The river
is heavily industrialized and has been for nearly 100 years. Under the Great Lakes Water
Quality Agreement, a Detroit River Stage 1 Remedial Action Plan (RAP) was completed in
1991. The Stage 1 RAP described the river's use and conditions and identified 11 beneficial use
impairments for the Detroit River AOC (Michigan Department of Natural Resources [MDNR]
1991). Known causes of the impairments include urban and industrial development in the
watershed, bacteria, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
(PAHs), metals, and oils and greases. CSOs and municipal and industrial discharges are major
sources of contaminants within the AOC. Stormwater runoff and discharge from tributaries in
Michigan are also major sources of contaminants. The following beneficial use impairments
were identified in the Stage 1 RAP:
• Restrictions on fish and wildlife consumption
• Tainting of fish and wildlife flavor
• Restrictions on drinking water consumption, or taste and odor
• Degradation of fish and wildlife populations
• Beach closings
• Fish tumors or other deformities
• Degradation of aesthetics
• Bird or animal deformities or reproduction problems
• Degradation of benthos
• Restriction on dredging activities
• Loss of fish and wildlife habitat.
At the time the Stage 1 RAP was drafted, six municipal drinking water intakes serving
approximately 4.1 million people in nearly 100 communities, and approximately 25 industries,
withdrew water from the Detroit River. As a receiving water, approximately 30 industries and
power plants discharged cooling water and/or process water, and 10 municipal wastewater
treatment plants discharged industrial and domestic wastewater. The principal industrial
discharges were on the Michigan shoreline along the lower 15 miles of the river from Zug Island
downstream through the Trenton Channel to the mouth of Lake Erie. Major industries included
steel mills, petroleum refineries, electrical power generating plants, chemical manufacturing
plants, and automotive part manufacturers. The largest discharger to the river was the Detroit
Harbortown Upstream Area Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
Page 1-3
June 2019
Water and Sewerage Department, which discharged an average of 715 million gallons per day,
including waste from more than 700 industrial users. An additional 46 facilities discharged to
Detroit River tributaries. The river also received urban and industrial runoff directly and through
its tributaries and storm sewer systems (MDNR 1991).
Use of the river today is similar to 1991 except that there are fewer industries and wastewater
treatment plants. In the Michigan portion of the AOC, there are currently four municipal
drinking water intakes serving approximately 4.2 million people in nearly 127 communities.
Approximately 20 industries and power plants discharge cooling water and/or process water to
the river, and approximately 29 additional facilities discharge to the tributaries. There are five
municipal wastewater treatment plants. The Detroit Water and Sewerage Department is still the
largest discharger, discharging an average of 1.3 billion gallons per day, including waste from
approximately 400 significant industrial users (EPA 2015).
The Stage 1 RAP and subsequent studies found that sediment contaminant concentrations in the
Detroit River are generally much greater along the Michigan shoreline compared to the mid-river
and Ontario shoreline (EPA 2015). The Michigan shoreline from the Rouge River downstream
through the Trenton Channel appears to be the most impacted. Contaminant distributions in
sediment reflect a combination of historical point sources and hydrological effects. Because
there is little lateral mixing in the Detroit River, contaminants in sediment are believed to deposit
according to longshore water flow following a longitudinal vector. This has resulted in high
contaminant levels in near-shore zones, particularly downstream of point sources and tributaries,
while large areas of the Detroit River exhibit moderate to low levels of contamination further
away from the Michigan shore (MDNR 1991).
Within the Harbortown Upstream Area, there are 10 known CSOs (Figure 1-3). Elevated PCBs
in the upper Detroit River are believed to be associated with discharge from some of these CSOs
(Kenaga and Crum 1987). Historically, U.S. Rubber and Parke Davis operated industrial
facilities within the Harbortown Upstream Area, which discharged to the Detroit River from five
or six outfalls (Figure 1-3). These outfalls are believed to be currently inactive (EPA 2015).
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 1-4
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
This page intentionally left blank
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 2-1
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
2. HARBORTOWN UPSTREAM AREA SITE INVESTIGATION
The Harbortown Upstream Area site characterization was conducted in coordination with EPA.
The investigations, including all sampling activities and analytical testing methods, were carried
out in accordance with procedures outlined in the Harbortown Upstream FSP and QAPP (EA
2018).
2.1 SAMPLING PROGRAM DESIGN AND RATIONALE
The site-specific QAPP details the project data quality objectives and outlines how the sample
collection program fulfills the project objectives (EA 2018). Sampling was conducted to
delineate the nature and extent of sediment contamination in the Harbortown Upstream Area of
the Detroit River AOC. Thirty samples from locations HT18-01 through HT18-32 were
collected using a vibracoring system and ponar grab sampler provided and operated by Cetacean
Marine from onboard the R/VMudpuppy II that was operated by Cetacean Marine.
2.1.1 Sample Locations
Sample Locations were selected in consultation with EPA and EGLE based on historical
sampling data, location of historical and current outfalls (Figure 1-3), water depth, and proximity
to the navigation channel. The locations HT18-31 and 32 were identified for sediment sampling
by EPA during the field event and were located upstream of the MacArthur Bridge in the center
of the channel between Belle Isle and the US mainland side of the Detroit River. Ponar grabs
and sediment cores were successfully collected from 29 of the 32 targeted locations. Collection
of one core and one ponar surface sample for physical and chemical analysis was attempted at
each location, with the exception of HT 18-16 where only a ponar sample was taken, and HT18-
27 where only a core sample was taken as described in Section 2.3.
Figure 2-1 presents the actual locations sampled in the Harbortown Upstream Area. Variance
between the actual and target coordinates was calculated and documented and is provided in
Table 2-1. Surface sample coordinates are provided in Table 2-2. Sample locations moved or
abandoned in the field are described in Section 2.8.
2.1.2 Number of Samples
Sediment core samples and ponar grabs were successfully collected from 29 of the 32 sample
locations in the Harbortown Upstream Area. Sediment core intervals were defined by observable
lithological changes and sediment recovery and varied from 1.1 to 9.7 ft (Table 2-3). From the
cores collected in the Harbortown Upstream Area, 142 sediment samples and 15 field duplicates
(FDs) were submitted for analysis (Table 2-4). Tables 2-2 and 2-3 provide details of the
sediment cores collected and analytical samples submitted.
A ponar grab sampler was used to collect sample volume from the top 6 inches (0-0.5 ft) of
sediment at the 30 sample locations to support analysis of the uppermost interval. Sufficient
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
Page 2-2
June 2019
volume for analysis of the surface sample was collected at 29 of the 32 sample locations and a
total of 29 surface grab samples and three FDs were submitted for analysis.
2.2 NAVIGATION AND SURVEY
Cetacean Marine used an onboard real time kinematic (RTK) Global Positioning System (GPS)
receiver—with a geodetic accuracy of 10 centimeters in the horizontal and two centimeters in the
vertical planes at an update frequency of 1 hertz—with a preloaded base map identifying target
sample locations to navigate to sample locations HT18-01 through HT18-30. Locations 18-31
and 18-32 were identified in the field by EPA.
The unit was checked for accuracy prior to use in accordance with EPA's Interim Guidance for
Developing GPS Data Collection Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and QAPPs (EPA
2008) and the procedures outlined in the Harbortown Upstream Area site characterization QAPP
(EA 2018). Once the vessel had navigated to a sample location, the sampling team visually
confirmed that the proximal location or surroundings matched the proposed location as shown on
the proposed sample location map in the QAPP (EA 2018) prior to sampling. Actual sample
location coordinates were recorded on the field data sheets and stored in the RTK GPS unit at the
time of sampling. Target and actual sample location coordinates are presented in Table 2-1.
2.3 SEDIMENT SAMPLING
Mobilization for the Harbortown Upstream Area sediment sampling effort commenced on
22 October 2018. Sample collection was initiated on 22 October 2018, and continued through
30 October 2018. Staging for the Harbortown Upstream Area field investigation took place at
the historical stables in Belle Isle Park in Detroit, Michigan. Level D personal protective
equipment (i.e., safety glasses, work boots, and nitrile gloves) were worn during core collection
as necessary (EA 2018). EA's SOPs 016 and 059 for maintaining field logbooks (Attachment A
of the FSP) were followed throughout sample collection and processing.
2.3.1 Vibracore Sampling
Cetacean Marine used vibracore technology to retrieve a total of 29 sediment cores from
32 locations for sediment sampling. Cores were retrieved as described in SOP MP 103 (EA
2018). The vibracoring system consisted of the vibracore head, and control box located between
the underwater cable and the power source. The vibracore head had a core tube clamp and an
internal vibrator motor. The vibracorer applied thousands of vibrations per minute to help
penetrate the sediment. The vibracorer was lowered to one ft above the water body and then
turned on when the core tube extending below it made contact with the sediment surface. The
vibracore system on board the R/VMudpuppy II was a Rossfelder P3C Vibracore. The core
barrel was fitted with polycarbonate 4-inch diameter core tubes for sample collection.
After retrieval, each core tube was capped at both ends, sealed, and measured. Each core tube
was also labeled with the location number, direction of top and bottom of core, and date and time
of retrieval. All sediment cores were stored upright on the R/VMudpuppy II. At the end of each
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 2-3
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
day, sediment cores were transferred to a refrigeration truck (cooled to 4 degrees Celsius [°C]) at
the onshore staging areas. The cores were stored upright in the secured refrigeration truck until
they could be processed. Appropriate holding times were maintained for all samples. Field
books and sample collection data sheets were prepared in accordance with the procedures
outlined in the FSP (EA 2018). A log of coring activities, sampling locations, water depths, and
core recoveries was recorded in a permanently bound logbook in indelible ink. Personnel names,
local weather conditions, and other information that impacted the field sampling program were
also recorded. Each page of the logbook was numbered and dated by the personnel entering
information. Copies of the field logbooks are provided in Appendix A.
2.3.2 Ponar Grab Sampling
A total of 29 surface sediment samples from locations HT18-01 through HT18-32 were
successfully collected using a ponar sampler onboard the R/VMudpuppy II and are included in
this Site Characterization Report. The procedure included deploying the sampler off the RZV
Mudpuppy II using a winch to deploy and retrieve the sampler to the deck, decanting water at the
top of the sampler and transferring the sediment into a disposable aluminum tray. Multiple
deployments were sometimes necessary to collect sufficient volume.
For each field effort, after ponar samples were retrieved, sediment for analysis of the ratio of
simultaneously extracted metals (SEM) to acid volatile sulfide (AVS) was placed into ajar
directly after sufficient volume for the surface sample was collected, and prior to
homogenization of the material to minimize aeration of the sample. Samples for SEM/AVS
analysis were filled with no headspace. Following collection of sediment for SEM/AVS, the
remaining sediment for all other analyses was thoroughly homogenized and then transferred
directly into laboratory-approved, labeled sample containers onboard the vessel. The surface
samples were stored in a cooler with ice onboard the barge until they were transferred to the
sample processing areas onshore and stored in a refrigeration truck (cooled to 4°C) until transit
to laboratory facilities.
2.3.3 Sediment Core Processing
Sediment core sample processing was performed at a temporary staging location at the historical
stables in Belle Isle Park in Detroit, Michigan. At the processing facility, cores were split
lengthwise, photographed, and lithologically logged and sampled at depth intervals as described
in the FSP and QAPP (EA 2018), unless otherwise noted. Sediments were classified in general
accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System under ASTM International Standard
D2487-11. Sediment logging activities were performed in accordance with SOP 016
(Attachment A of the FSP [EA 2018]).
After photographing and completing the core's lithologic log, interval-dedicated decontaminated
spatulas or spoons were used to remove sediment from the designated sample intervals within a
core and placed in clean, disposable aluminum trays. Prior to sample collection, sample interval
material was homogenized by mixing until consistency was uniform. Cores were generally
sampled at two-ft intervals. This was altered if there was a distinct change in lithology or there
Harbortown Upstream Area Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 2-4
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
was visible contamination. Sediment samples were packaged and shipped in accordance with
EA SOPs (EA 2018). Re-used equipment (e.g., cutting tools, broad knife, spatula, etc.) was
decontaminated in accordance with the decontamination procedures described in Section 2.6.
Lithologic and photographic logs of sediment cores are provided in Appendixes B and C,
respectively.
2.4 ANALYTICAL PROGRAM
The analytical program is summarized in Table 2-4. With a few exceptions due to inadequate
sample volume (as detailed in Section 3.2.1), Harbortown Upstream Area sediment samples
underwent the following analyses:
• PCBs (Aroclors)
• 34 PAHs
• Michigan 10 metals (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury,
selenium, silver, and zinc) plus iron and nickel
• Total organic carbon (TOC)
• Percent solids/moisture.
In addition to the above analytical parameters, surface sediment samples (0- to 0.5-ft interval)
were analyzed for:
• SEM/AVS
• Diesel range organics (DRO)
• Oil range organics (ORO)
• Grain size
• Cyanide.
These additional analyses were performed on the surface sediment samples because the data they
yield are useful for assessing toxicity to organisms that typically contact only the surface
sediments. Matrix spike (MS)/matrix spike duplicate (MSD) samples were not collected for
percent solids or grain size.
2.5 SAMPLE HANDLING, CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY, AND QUALITY
ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
2.5.1 Sample Handling, Chain-of-Custody, and Documentation
Sediment samples analyzed for PCBs (Aroclors), 34 PAHs, total Michigan metals (arsenic,
barium, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, selenium, silver, and zinc) plus iron and
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 2-5
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
nickel, TOC, percent solids, SEM/AVS, DRO, ORO, grain size, and cyanide were picked up
from the site sample processing facility by TestAmerica's courier and shipped to TestAmerica's
laboratory in Burlington, Vermont. Samples were placed in the appropriate sample containers
(obtained from TestAmerica), preserved, and labeled in accordance with the QAPP/FSP (EA
2018). With exception given to sediment collected for SEM/AVS analysis, sediments within an
interval were mixed to uniform consistency to homogenize prior to placing in jars. Sediment
sampled for SEM/AVS analysis was placed directly into jars after sufficient surface sample
volume was collected, prior to homogenization. SEM/AVS samples were filled without
headspace. In preparation for shipment to the laboratories, all samples were packaged in
accordance with the procedures outlined in the FSP (EA 2018).
Sample labeling was performed in accordance with SOP 001 (Attachment A of the FSP [EA
2018]). Individual sample containers were labeled with a unique designation that corresponded
to the specific geographic location, year of collection, and subsample depth interval. The FSP
(EA 2018) outlines the specific sample identification procedures that were implemented. Sample
identifications included the location (HT for Harbortown Upstream), the year of sampling (18 for
2018), the location number, and either "-SURF" for surface samples or the interval from the core
in feet. An example of a sample identifier is "HT18-22-3050," which describes a sample
collected from the Harbortown Upstream Area in 2018 at location 22 at the depth interval of
3-5 ft below sediment surface. Sample intervals within the core were determined based on
lithological features, visual or olfactory signs of contamination, and guidance from EPA. FDs
were designated by adding "FD" to the end of the sample identifier. MS/MSDs were designated
by adding "MS" or "MSD" to the end of the sample identifier. For example: HT 18-23-103 0-FD
or HT18-12-SURF-MS.
Chain-of-custody forms were completed and used to track samples from the time of sampling to
the arrival of samples at the laboratory. Completed chain-of-custody forms are provided in
Appendix A (available electronically) of the Data Usability Assessment Report (EA 2019).
2.5.2 Quality Control
Throughout the project, various measures were implemented to help facilitate the overall quality
and usability of the collected data. The field investigation activities included collection of
additional quality control samples (e.g., duplicates, MS/MSD, etc.) sufficient to meet the
requirements of the data quality objectives as defined in Section A.7 of the QAPP (EA 2018).
Duplicate samples were submitted as described in the FSP, and field and laboratory quality
control requirements were completed in accordance with Section B.5 of the QAPP (EA 2018).
Deviations from the QAPP/FSP can be found in Section 2.8.
2.6 DECONTAMINATION
Decontamination procedures were implemented during the field investigation to prevent cross-
contamination between sampling locations. During sampling activities, disposable or dedicated
sampling tools and materials were utilized whenever possible to minimize the decontamination
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
Page 2-6
June 2019
effort. Decontamination procedures were carried out in accordance with the SOPs presented in
Attachment A of the FSP (EA 2018).
2.7 INVESTIGATION-DERIVED WASTE
Following collection of the sediment samples, investigation-derived waste was managed in
accordance with the procedures described in the SOPs presented in Attachment A of the FSP
(EA 2018). In general, residual sediments and decontamination water were collected, drummed,
and disposed of offsite in accordance with the EA SOPs. Water used for decontamination of the
sampling equipment on the R/VMudpuppy II was allowed to drain back into the river at each
respective sampling location. Disposable materials and personal protective equipment that came
into contact with site sediments were bagged and disposed of as general municipal waste.
2.8 DEVIATIONS FROM THE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN AND
FIELD SAMPLING PLAN
2.8.1 Sampling Locations
Thirty sample locations within the Harbortown Upstream Area were originally chosen based on
historical sampling data, location of historic and current outfalls, water depth, and input from
EGLE. Two additional samples were added at locations determined by EPA during the field
event (Table 2-1).
Of the 32 actual sample locations in the Harbortown Upstream Area, 26 were more than 10 ft
from the target sample location (Table 2-1). Per the QAPP, sample locations could be adjusted
up to 33 ft (10 meters) to allow for accessibility. Of the 26 locations that were more than 10 ft
from the target sample location, 19 locations were moved more than 33 ft from the target sample
location (HT18-01, -02, -03, -04, -05, -09, -10, -11, -13, -15, -17, -18, -19, -20, -21, -24, -25, -27,
and -30); EPA was aware of and approved these location moves.
Nine locations (HT18-01, -09, -10, -18, -19, -21, -24, -25, and -27) were shifted due to
weather/wind and current conditions that affected anchoring placement at the time of core
retrieval. Five locations (HT18-04, -13, -17, -20, and -30) were moved per EPA's request with
concern for location in proximity to the shore or the Mac Arthur Bridge. Two locations (FIT 18-
02 and FIT 18-15) were moved to avoid structures such as rip rap, pipeline, and large rocks. Two
locations (HT18-03 and -05) were moved closer to the mouth of Connor Creek and within
Conner Creek to follow expected contamination and HT18-11 was moved to avoid close
proximity of a burned Bolbo boat. HT18-30 was shifted approximately 100 ft upstream from the
MacArthur Bridge during the field effort; however, the coordinates in this report are estimated
due to an error with GPS coordinates. Table 2-1 presents coordinates for the target and actual
locations, as well as the distance between the actual and target locations.
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
Page 2-7
June 2019
2.8.2 Sample Recovery
Sediment penetration and recovery of the cores, as observed through the clear core liner, were
recorded on a field data collection form for each location. The recovery value was also verified
immediately prior to processing to ensure sediment had settled in core tubes that were partially
full. Sediment penetration and recovery of the cores used for chemical analysis are presented in
Table 2-3. Per the QAPP, if sufficient core recovery (60 percent) is not achieved in during core
collection, up to three attempts can be made at that sample location.
Cores were not recovered from three locations: HT18-16, -22, and -28 (Table 2-3). Stations
HT18-22 and HT18-28 were abandoned as per instruction of EPA in favor of HT18-31 and
HT18-32, while three attempts were made at HT18-16 with little to no recovery before this
location was abandoned per EPA's request. Boring depths ranged from 2 ft (HT18-10 and
HT18-21) to 10 ft (HT18-02, -06, -07, -08, -09, -11, -12, -13, -23, -25. -26, and-30). In four
locations (HT18-14, -21, -24, and -27), two attempts were completed to collect a core that had 60
percent or more recovery; and in location HT 18-23, three attempts were completed to collect a
core with over 60 percent recovery. The number of attempts at each location is included in the
field logbook and field data sheets in Appendix A. Details of the cores that were processed and
submitted for analysis are presented in Table 2-3.
Surface samples were collected at 29 of the 32 sample locations (Tables 2-2 and 2-3). No
surface sediment was retrieved at locations HT 18-22 and 28, as these stations were abandoned
per instruction of EPA in favor of locations HT18-31 and 32. After six ponar attempts, HT18-27
was abandoned per instruction from EPA. In four locations (HT18-10, -14,-19, -26), two ponar
attempts were consolidated to achieve the needed volume for grab sample analysis; in location
HT18-29, three attempts were consolidated; and in location HT18-21, four ponar attempts were
consolidated. The number of attempts at each location is included in the field logbook and field
data sheets in Appendix A, and details of the cores that were processed and submitted for
analysis are presented in Table 2-2.
2.8.3 Sample Processing and Analytical Program
In accordance with the QAPP, sediment core intervals were defined by observable lithological
changes. Per EPA's direction during the field investigation, sediment core intervals were also
observed for visible or olfactory signs of contamination (e.g., non-aqueous phase liquid, sheen,
hydrocarbon odor). Table 2-4 presents the actual analytical program, including the start and end
of each sample interval. Sediment intervals are documented in the field data collection forms
(Appendix A), lithologic logs (Appendix B), and the photographic log (Appendix C).
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 2-8
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
This page intentionally left blank
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-1
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
3. RESULTS
3.1 DATA EVALUATION
The overall data quality objective for the project was to provide data of known and documented
quality to characterize current site conditions in the Harbortown Upstream Area. Data collected
from the Harbortown Upstream Area were validated by evaluating the completeness, correctness,
and conformance of the data set against the method, SOP, or contract requirements documented
in the QAPP/FSP (EA 2018). The data review and validation achieved the project goals. The
overall data review and validation program attained the project objectives with no adverse effects
on data quality or usability (EA 2019).
To address the goals of this assessment, the validated data collected under this investigation were
compared to the consensus-based threshold effects concentrations (TECs) and the probable
effects concentrations (PECs) of the Sediment Quality Guidelines (SQGs) where available
(MacDonald et al. 2000; Persaud et al. 1993; EPA 2003b, 2005; Wisconsin Department of
Natural Resources [WDNR] 2003). A PEC has not been developed for total petroleum
hydrocarbon (TPH) (DRO + ORO); however, the DRO and ORO results were compared to
Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level (SSRSLs). Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment
Benchmarks Toxicity Units (ESBTUs) were calculated to estimate whether there is potential
ecological risk associated with exposure to pore water that is in equilibrium with a measured
concentration of the contaminant in the sediment. Probable effects concentration quotients
(PEC-Qs) are used to evaluate the combined effects of chemical mixtures on the toxicity of
sediments to benthic organisms against mean PEC quotients or benchmarks (mean quotients of
0.1, 0.5, 1, and 5) (Ingersoll et al. 2001). Contaminant concentrations exceeding the applicable
SQGs, SSRSLs, ESBTUs, or PEC-Qs were identified. Figures have been prepared to visually
present contaminant concentrations and identify potential hot spots or focus areas within the
study area.
Detected values equal to or greater than the method detection limit, but less than the laboratory
reporting limit (RL), were J-qualified and are estimated. Analytes that were not detected were
U-qualified. Field duplicate results are presented in the analytical tables but are not included in
the bulk sediment results figures and discussion.
3.1.1 Comparison to Sediment Quality Guidelines
The SQGs were developed as informal (non-regulatory) guidelines for use in interpreting
chemical data from analyses of sediments. Several biological-effects approaches have been used
to assess freshwater sediment quality relative to the potential for adverse effects on benthic
organisms, including the TEC/PEC (MacDonald et al. 2000) approach. The TEC and PEC levels
were derived using concentrations with both effects and no observed effects (MacDonald et al.
2000). TECs typically represent concentrations below which adverse biological effects are
unlikely to be observed, while PECs typically represent concentrations above which adverse
effects are likely to be observed (MacDonald et al. 2000). Concentrations that are between the
TEC and PEC represent the concentrations at which adverse biological effects occasionally
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-2
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
occur. TEC and PEC levels for iron were not available from the MacDonald et al. document,
and only a TEC value was provided for silver. Therefore, iron concentrations in sediment from
the Harbortown Upstream Area were compared to the TEC and PEC values for iron documented
in the Ontario effect-based freshwater SQGs (Persaud et al. 1993), and silver concentrations
were compared to TEC and PEC values for silver documented in draft criteria for managing
contaminated sediment in British Columbia (MacDonald and MacFarlane 1999). These iron and
silver benchmarks were recommended for use by EGLE and EPA, and they also appear in
guidance from the WDNR (WDNR 2003).
3.1.2 Calculation of Total Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Total Polychlorinated
Biphenyls
When calculating total 17 PAHs, results that were J-qualified were calculated using the result
value, and results that were U-qualified were calculated using one-half the RL. Substituting one-
half the RL (not detected [ND] = V2 RL) for each ND provides a conservative estimate of the
concentration. This method, however, tends to produce results that are biased high, especially in
data sets where many samples are NDs. This overestimation is important to consider when
comparing calculated total values to guidelines. Total PCB results often have a significant
number of NDs. Additionally, individual PCB Aroclors represent mixtures of PCB congeners,
creating the potential for double counting. For these reasons, total PCB concentrations were
calculated by summing the concentrations of each PCB Aroclor with NDs set equal to zero (ND
= 0) to reduce the potential for overestimation.
3.1.3 Ratio of Simultaneously Extracted Metals to Acid Volatile Sulfide
The bioavailability of divalent metals to aquatic organisms is influenced by the presence of AVS.
In low oxygenated (anaerobic) environments, divalent metals precipitate as metal sulfides,
making them unavailable for uptake by aquatic organisms. Using this method, six metals
(cadmium, copper, lead, nickel, mercury, and zinc) were extracted, measured, converted to units
of micromoles per gram and added together (including any values that were J-qualified) to
determine the amount of SEM. If a metal was not detected, it was considered a zero in the
calculation. SEM was then compared to the amount of AVS detected (units of micromoles per
gram) in the same sediment sample. If AVS was not detected in the sample, the SEM/AVS ratio
was not calculated.
An SEM/AVS ratio less than 1 indicates a high degree of probability that the metals are bound as
metal sulfides and not bioavailable to aquatic organisms. If the SEM/AVS ratio is greater than 1,
then the metals in sediment exceed the sulfide binding ability and have a higher probability of
being bioavailable to aquatic organisms.
While the SEM/AVS ratio provides information on bioavailability, it does not always inform
toxicity. Metal toxicity is evaluated through an indirect estimate of bioavailability based on the
concentrations of AVS and SEM, as well as TOC in the sediments. Metal ESBTUs were
calculated following the methods outlined in Procedures for the Derivation of Equilibrium
Partitioning Sediment Benchmarks (ESBs) for the Protection of Benthic Organisms: Metal
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-3
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
Mixtures (Cadmium, Copper, Lead, Nickel, Silver, and Zinc) (EPA 2005). The molar
concentration of AVS was subtracted from the molar concentration of the sum of the SEM
measured in each sediment sample, and the result was divided by the fraction of organic carbon,
accounting for preferential sorption of metals to organic carbon. It should be noted that if the
particular sample has excess AVS such that all SEM is accounted for, this value can be negative.
As presented in the EPA 2005 guidance, when metals ESBTUs are calculated using this method,
a value less than 130 micromoles (|imol) of residual SEM per gram organic carbon (goc)
indicates that the sediment poses a low risk of adverse biological effects associated with metals.
Values between 130 and 3,000 |imol/goc may have adverse effects, and values greater than
3,000 |imol/goc are expected to be associated with adverse effects. Details of the metals ESBTU
calculation and results are presented in Chapter 4.
3.1.4 Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmark Toxic Units
ESBTUs were used to estimate if a potential ecological risk exists associated with exposure to
pore water that is in equilibrium with a measured concentration of a contaminant in the sediment.
Typically, a PAH ESBTU less than or equal to 1 indicates that benthic organisms are not
expected to be harmed by contamination present in the sediments (EPA 2003a). The PAH
ESBTU benchmark of 7.5 is based on the preliminary remediation goal (PRG) for PAHs
developed for the Lower Rouge River Old Channel (LRROC) Great Lakes Legacy Act site,
which is also located within the Detroit River AOC (AMEC et al. 2013). The LRROC PRG is
based on the Sediment Contaminant Bioavailability Alliance (SCBA) dataset (Geiger 2010),
which is a widely accepted sediment assessment tool comprised of over 250 samples from 18
sediment sites where PAHs were the source of contamination. The dataset was used to evaluate
risk to sensitive species (Hyalella azteca, freshwater amphipod) in the benthic community based
on pore water exposure. The LRROC PRG was used for comparison based on guidance
provided by EGLE and EPA.
Eighty percent survivability is a typical level of acceptability for benthic organisms exposed to
pore water from contaminated sediments. The LRROC PRG was established at 85 percent
survivability based on SCBA toxicity results from the 28-day Hyalella test. Based on a
correlation using the SCBA dataset, 85 percent survivability correlated with a level of 5 toxic
units; however, most sediment chemistry samples are based on analysis of bulk sediments. For
the LRROC site, in order to arrive at a bulk sediment toxic unit equal to 5 toxic units in pore
water, a relationship was established between pore water and bulk sediment based on site-
specific PAH samples. The result was that a toxic unit of 7.5 in bulk sediments was found to be
equal to 5 toxic units in pore water. Details of the ESBTU calculations and results are presented
in Chapter 4.
3.1.5 Probable Effects Concentration Quotients
PEC-Qs were used to evaluate the combined effects of chemical mixtures on the toxicity of
sediments to benthic organisms against mean PEC quotients or benchmarks (mean quotients of
0.1, 0.5, 1 and 5) (Ingersoll et al. 2001). The PEC-Qs combine data from multiple constituents in
Harbortown Upstream Area Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-4
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
sediments into one unit-less index, and thus are useful in comparing the quality of sediments
from different locations and at different times (EPA 2000). A benchmark PEC-Q of 0.5 was
used because the proportion of organisms that show toxic effect drops to 6-35 percent when a
geometric mean of the PEC-Q of 0.5 is used, meaning that between 94 and 65 percent of
organisms do not show a toxic effect when the PEC-Q is 0.5 (Ingersoll et. al. 2001). Details of
the PEC-Q calculations and results are presented in Chapter 5.
3.2 RESULTS FROM THE HARBORTOWN UPSTREAM AREA SEDIMENT
INVESTIGATION
Due to the close proximity of the sample locations within the Harbortown Upstream Area, there
was no division of this area needed for reporting and visual presentation. HT18-01 was the
sampling location furthest upstream and was located off southeast of the Keelson Road canal.
HT18-30 was the sampling location furthest downstream and was located off the shore of
Gabriel Richard Park just east of the MacArthur Bridge. Two locations (HT18-31, and -32) were
located in the center of the channel between Belle Isle and US mainland, and HT18-03 was
located within Connor Creek by the request of EPA.
3.2.1 Sample Recovery
One core was collected and processed from 29 of 32 locations during the 2018 Harbortown
Upstream field effort. Cores were not collected from three locations (HT18-16, -22, and -28).
Core recovery did not meet or exceed 70 percent after at least three attempts at HT18-16 (no
recovery) while HT18-22 and HT18-28 were abandoned per EPA's request in favor of alternate
locations. Ponar surface samples were collected at 29 of 32 sample locations. No surface
sediment was retrieved at locations HT18-22, -27, and -28. HT18-27 had little to no recovery
after six ponar grab attempts, while HT 18-22 and HT 18-28 were abandoned per EPA's request
in favor of locations HT18-31 and HT18-32.
Core collection attempts were targeted to reach a depth of 10 ft or clay, whichever occurred first.
Sediment recovery ranged from 1.2 ft (HT18-29) to 9.7 ft (HT18-12) (Table 2-3). Detailed
lithographic descriptions of the 29 collected cores are presented in Appendix B.
3.2.2 Lithology
The sediment cores collected within the Harbortown Upstream Area demonstrated core profiles
containing sediment types consistent with a fluvial system with a strong current. A majority of
the cores were comprised of a sandy silt mixture with bands on clay running through them.
Native and non-native material such as shells, roots, organic material, and organic/ hydrocarbon
odors were observed within various sediment types and depths. Complete core logs and
photographs are provided in Appendixes B and C, respectively. A general description of cores
collected during the investigation is included in the text that follows.
A total of 30 cores were collected in the Harbortown Upstream Area. Starting upstream of the
sample area, HT18-01 off the shore southeast of Keelson Road Canal and ending HT18-30 just
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-5
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
east of the MacArthur Bridge off the shore of Gabriel Richard Park. Cores collected in the
sample area had varying lithology; however, a majority of them included layers of silt, sand, and
clay.
Starting in the upstream area, cores HT18-01 and -02 were comprised of a fine-grained silt/sand
mixture imbedded with stiffer clay nodules and layers intermixed lower in the core. HT18-03
was collected within Connor Creek and also contained soft, silt layers imbedded with stiff clay
and sand lower in the core. HT18-04 through -09 contained soft, silty sediment layers near the
top of the core underlain by sandy silt layered with sand and some clay. HT18-10 was collected
upstream of the St. Jean Boat Launch, and it was comprised mainly of clean medium-grained
sand. HT18-11 and HT18-12 both contained wet, soft, silty top layers underlain by silty sand
with HT18-12 having interbedded clay mixed throughout the silty sand within deeper layers.
HT18-13 through -17 had sandy tops underlain by silty clay. HT18-18 and -19 had silty tops
with HT18-18 having clay and sand in the deeper layers while HT18-19 had a coarse sand
underlayment. Both HT 18-20 and -21 had sandy tops while HT 18-20 had a stiff clay
underlayment. HT18-23 through-26 had a fine, sandy/silty top with sand and clay underlayment.
HT18-27 and -29 both had a gravely top with HT18-27 having a stiff clay underlayment.
HT18-30 was composed of uniform clayey silt. HT18-31 and -32 both had a sandy top with a
layered sand and clay underlayment.
Many of the cores in the Harbortown Upstream Area had pebbles and cobbles in the soft
sediment. Hydrocarbon odors were observed in the following cores: HT18-03, -06, -07, -08, 09,
-12, -13, -18, -19, -25, and -30. A sheen from non-aqueous phase liquid was observed at on
HT18-18 and HT18-19. The core colors ranged from gray, dark gray, very dark gray, black,
blueish black, and dark greenish gray. Construction and cultural debris were found in HT 18-02,
-06, -14, -21, and -29. Peat and organic silt were found inHT18-31.
Bulk Sediment Results
From the 32 sample locations, 15 FDs and 142 sediment samples were submitted for PCB
Aroclors , 34 PAHs, total Michigan metals plus iron and nickel,, and TOC analyses;
142 sediment samples and 15 FDs were submitted for percent moisture analysis; 29 sediment
samples and three FDs were submitted for SEM/AVS, DRO, ORO, grain size, and cyanide
analyses (Table 2-4). A summary of the screening criteria, number of exceedances, and
maximum values for each constituent is provided in Table 3-1.
The APTIM Federal Services, LLC (APTIM) Quality Assurance Technical Support Program was
subcontracted by EPA to conduct a 100 percent Tier I and 20 percent Tier II data validation
verification check for this project. The Tier I and Tier II reviews were performed according to
the National Functional Guidelines for Superfund Organics Method Data Review (EPA 2014a)
and National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Superfund Data Review (EPA 2014b).
Electronic data validation was performed within GLNPO's exchange and Evaluation System
prior to review by APTIM's Quality Assurance Technical Support Program (EA 2018). To
assess compliance with the Laboratory Statement of Work, data validation included
completeness and compliance checks, data assessment, and validation at Stage 2 following
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-6
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
Guidance for Labeling Externally Validated Laboratory Analytical Data for Superfund Use (EPA
2009).
3.2.2.1 Grain Size, Particle Size, and Density
Analytical results for grain size, particle size, and density are presented in Table 3-2. These
results provide additional data for characterizing sediments that can be useful in subsequent
investigations or to support potential remediation efforts. A total of 32 surface (0-0.5 ft) samples
(including FDs) were submitted for grain size analysis. Of the total samples, 21 (67 percent)
were composed primarily (greater than 50 percent) of silt and clay. Silt and clay content in
samples ranged from 4.2 percent (HT18-10) to 95.2 percent (HT18-09).
Four of the surface grab samples were comprised of at least 65 percent sand (HT18-10, -15, -17,
and -19,), with the highest percentage (86.7 percent) at HT18-10. HT18-14 had the highest
percentage of gravel in the surface grab sample (55.8 percent). The surface grab sample with the
highest percentage of silt and clay was collected at location HT18-10 (95.2 percent). Particle
size distribution graphs for each sample are presented in Appendix D.
3.2.2.2 Polychlorinated Biphenyl Aroclors
PCB Aroclors data and total PCB (ND = 0) concentrations are presented in Table 3-3.
Figure 3-1 shows the distribution of total PCB SQG exceedances (TEC is 59.8 micrograms per
kilogram [|ig/kg]; PEC is 676 |ig/kg) in the sampling area. Results from the surface grab
samples (0- to 0.5-ft interval) are shown on the aerial photo and results from the core depth
intervals are shown on the associated graphs. The most frequently detected Aroclors were
Aroclor 1254 (64 detections in 157 samples, 41 percent), Aroclor 1242 (43 detections in 157
samples, 27 percent), and Aroclor 1260 (28 detections in 157 samples, 18 percent).
In the Harbortown Upstream Area, a total of five surface grab samples had PCB concentrations
greater than the TEC values and no samples above the PEC (HT18-03, -05, -06, -07, and -12).
The remaining locations had total PCB concentrations in the grab surface samples that were less
than the TEC. The highest total PCB concentration in a surface grab sample was detected in
location HT18-03 (220 |ig/kg).
In the core samples, eight locations had a maximum total PCB concentration in at least one depth
interval that was greater than the TEC and below the PEC (HT18-01, -08, -09, -12, -13, -14, -20,
and -30). Three locations had maximum total PCB concentrations in at least one depth interval
that were greater than two times the PEC (HT18-03, -05, and -07); one location had a maximum
total PCB concentration in at least one depth interval that was greater than three times the PEC
(HT18-06). The remaining locations had total PCB concentrations in the subsurface intervals
that were each below the TEC. The highest total PCB concentration in a subsurface sample was
detected in location HT18-06 within the 7.1- to 8.1-ft interval (6,000 |ig/kg).
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-7
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
3.2.2.3 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
PAH data, total 17 PAHs (ND = V2 RL), and total 34 PAHs (ND= V2 RL) are presented in Table
3-4. Total 17 PAHs were calculated using both 17 individual PAHs and 34 individual PAHs;
however, the total 17 PAHs were used as a comparison threshold to be consistent with the
derivation of the TEC/PEC values. Figure 3-2 shows the distribution of total 17 PAHs SQG
exceedances (TEC is 1,610 |ig/kg; PEC is 22,800 |ig/kg) in the Harbortown Upstream Area.
Results from the surface grab samples (0- to 0.5-ft interval) are shown on the aerial photo, and
results from the core depth intervals are shown on the associated graphs.
In the Harbortown Upstream Area, a total of 22 surface grab samples had total 17 PAHs
concentrations between the TEC and PEC and no samples were above the PEC (HT18-01, -02, -
03, -05, -06 -08, -09, -10, -11, -12, -14, -15, -16 -18, -19, -20, -21, -22, -24, -25, -26 and -29).
The highest total 17 PAHs concentration in a surface grab sample was detected in location
HT18-19 (14,015 |ig/kg).
In the core samples, 15 locations had a maximum total 17 PAHs concentrations in at least one
depth interval that was greater than the TEC and below the PEC (HT18-01, -02, -03, -05, -06, -
07, -09, -11, -12, -13, -20, -24, -26, -29, and -30). Two locations had a maximum total 17 PAHs
concentration in at least one depth interval that was between one and two times greater than the
PEC (HT18-14 and -27); and four locations had a maximum total 17 PAHs concentration in at
least one depth interval that was greater than three times the PEC (HT18-08, -18, -19, and -25).
The highest total 17 PAHs concentration in a subsurface sample was detected in location HT18-
25 within the 0- to 1-ft interval (117,500 |ig/kg).
3.2.2.4 Total Organic Carbon
TOC results are provided in Table 3-5. In addition to providing additional data for
characterizing sediments, TOC results are utilized in the calculation of metals ESBTUs, as
discussed in Section 4.2. In the surface grab samples, TOC ranged from 2,340 mg/kg
(0.23 percent) at HT18-10, to 53,100 mg/kg (5.31 percent) at location HT18-03. For the core
samples, TOC ranged from 2,180 mg/kg (0.22 percent) at HT18-31 in the 2.6- to 5.7-ft interval,
to 113,000 mg/kg (11.3 percent) at HT18-01 in the 5- to 7-ft interval.
3.2.2.5 Metals
Metal results were compared to respective TEC and PEC values and are presented in Table 3-5
(MacDonald et al. 2000; WDNR 2003). Of the 12 analyzed metals, two (barium and selenium)
do not have TEC or PEC values; therefore, these metals are not discussed in this section and
were not included in the spatial analysis for the site (Chapter 6).
The detected concentrations for each metal compared with TEC/PEC values at each location are
displayed in the following figures: Figure 3-3 (arsenic), Figure 3-4 (cadmium), Figure 3-5
(chromium), Figure 3-6 (copper), Figure 3-7 (iron), Figure 3-8 (lead), Figure 3-9 (mercury),
Figure 3-10 (nickel), Figure 3-11 (silver), and Figure 3-12 (zinc). Results from the surface grab
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
Page 3-8
June 2019
samples (0- to 0.5-ft interval) are shown on the aerial photo and results from the sonic core depth
intervals are shown on the associated graphs.
Figure 3-3 shows the distribution of arsenic SQG exceedances (TEC is 9.79 mg/kg; PEC is
33 mg/kg) in the Harbortown Upstream Area. Each surface grab sample at the site had a total
arsenic concentration below the TEC with the exception of HT18-01 and -05, both of which had
a concentration between one and two times greater than the TEC and below the PEC (10.1 and
10.1 mg/kg, respectively). HT18-01 and -05 had the highest surface sample arsenic
concentrations detected in the Harbortown Upstream Area (10.1 and 10.1 mg/kg, respectively).
For the core samples, 12 locations had a maximum arsenic concentration in at least one depth
interval that was greater than the TEC and below the PEC (HT18-03, -05, -06, -09, -12, -13, -15,
-18, -19, -25-, -30, and -31). One location had a maximum arsenic concentration in at least one
depth interval that was between one and two times greater than the PEC (HT18-08). The
maximum subsurface arsenic concentration detected in the Harbortown Upstream Area was at
HT18-08 in the 2.3- to 4.6-ft depth interval (34.1 mg/kg).
Figure 3-4 shows the distribution of cadmium SQG exceedances (TEC is 0.99 mg/kg; PEC is
4.98 mg/kg) in the Harbortown Upstream Area. In this area, six surface grab samples had a
maximum cadmium concentration that was greater that the TEC and below the PEC (HT 18-05, -
08, -12, -16, -18, and -26). One surface grab sample had a maximum cadmium concentration
between one and two times greater than the PEC (HT18-03). The maximum surface grab sample
cadmium concentration detected in the Harbortown Upstream Area was at HT18-03 (6.1 mg/kg).
For the core samples, five locations had a maximum cadmium concentration in at least one depth
interval that was greater than the TEC and below the PEC (HT18-01, -08, -11, -14, and -20).
Seven locations had a maximum cadmium concentration in at least one depth interval that was
one and two times greater than the PEC (HT18-05, -06, -09, -12, -18, -19, and -25); and four
locations had a maximum cadmium concentration in at least one depth interval that was greater
than three times the PEC (HT18-03, -07, -13, and -30). The maximum subsurface cadmium
concentration detected in the Harbortown Upstream Area was at HT 18-03 in the 3- to 4.6-ft
depth interval (25.1 mg/kg).
Figure 3-5 shows the distribution of chromium SQG exceedances (TEC is 43.4 mg/kg;
PEC is 111 mg/kg) in the Harbortown Upstream Area. In this area, each surface grab sample
maximum chromium concentration was below the TEC with the exception HT18-03 and -05,
which both had a concentration between one and two times greater than the TEC and below the
PEC (84.6 and 57.3 mg/kg, respectively).
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
Page 3-9
June 2019
For the core samples, six locations had a maximum chromium concentration in at least one depth
interval that was greater than the TEC and below the PEC (HT18-05, -09, -12, -13, -21, and -25).
Three locations had a maximum chromium concentration in at least one depth interval that was
between one and two times greater than the PEC (HT18-06, -07, and -30); and one location had
a maximum chromium concentration in at least one depth interval that was greater than
two times the PEC (HT18-03). The maximum subsurface concentration detected in the
Harbortown Upstream Area was at HT18-03 in the 3- to 4.6-ft depth interval (232 mg/kg).
Figure 3-6 shows the distribution of copper SQG exceedances (TEC is 31.6 mg/kg; PEC is
149 mg/kg) in the Harbortown Upstream Area. In this area, 17 surface grab samples had a
maximum copper concentration that was greater that the TEC and below the PEC (HT18-03, -05,
-06, -08, -09, -11, -12, -13, -16, -18, -19, -20, -23, -24, -25, -26, and -30). There were no surface
grab samples that exceeded the PEC and the maximum surface grab sample copper concentration
detected was at HT18-03 (113 mg/kg).
For the core samples, 12 locations had a maximum copper concentration in at least one depth
interval that was greater than the TEC and below the PEC (HT18-01, -02, -06, -07, -08, -09, -11,
-13, -14, -20, -29, and -30). Five locations had a maximum copper concentration in at least one
depth interval that was between one and two times greater than the PEC (HT18-03, -05, -12, -
19, and -25); and one location had a maximum copper concentration in at least one depth interval
that was greater two times than the PEC (HT18-18). The maximum subsurface concentration
detected in the Harbortown Upstream Area was at HT18-18 in the 0- to 1.9-ft depth interval (302
mg/kg).
Figure 3-7 shows the distribution of iron SQG exceedances (TEC is 20,000 mg/kg; PEC is
40,000 mg/kg) in the Harbortown Upstream Area. In this area, 11 surface grab samples had a
maximum iron concentration that was greater that the TEC and below the PEC (HT 18-01, -05, -
06, -08, -09, -11, -13, -23, -25, -30, and -31). No surface grab samples had maximum iron
concentrations above the PEC and the maximum iron concentration found in a surface sample
was at location HT18-30 (27,000 mg/kg).
For the core samples, 15 locations had a maximum iron concentration in at least one depth
interval that was greater than the TEC and below the PEC (HT18-03, -05, -06, -08, -09, -11, -12,
-13, -15, -18, -20, -21, -25, -27, and -30). No subsurface samples had maximum iron
concentrations that exceeded the PEC and the maximum subsurface concentration detected in the
Harbortown Upstream Area was at HT 18-09 in the 5- to 7-ft depth interval (28,700 mg/kg).
Figure 3-8 shows the distribution of lead SQG exceedances (TEC is 35.8 mg/kg; PEC is
128 mg/kg) in the Harbortown Upstream Area. In this area, 15 surface grab samples had a
Copper
Iron
Lead
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-10
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
maximum lead concentration that was greater that the TEC and below the PEC (HT18-03, -05, -
06, -07, -08, -11, -12, -18, -19, -20, -23, -24, -26, -29, and -30). One surface grab sample had a
maximum lead concentration that was greater than two times the PEC (HT18-16). The
maximum lead concentration found in a surface sample was found at location HT18-16 (288
mg/kg).
For the core samples, eight locations had a maximum lead concentration in at least one depth
interval that was greater than the TEC and below the PEC (HT18-01, -02, -09, -11,-14, -26, -27,
and -29). Eight locations had a maximum lead concentration in at least one depth interval that
was one to two times greater than the PEC (HT18-06, -07, -08, -12, -13, -20, -21„ and -30); and
five locations had a maximum lead concentration in at least one depth interval that was greater
than three times the PEC (HT18-03, -05, -18, -19, and -25). The maximum subsurface lead
concentration detected in the Harbortown Upstream Area was at HT18-19 in the 0- to 1-ft depth
interval (624 mg/kg).
Mercury
Figure 3-9 shows the distribution of mercury SQG exceedances (TEC is 0.18 mg/kg; PEC is
1.06 mg/kg) in the Harbortown Upstream Area. In this area, four surface grab samples had a
maximum mercury concentration that was greater that the TEC and below the PEC (HT18-03, -
05, -19, and -25). One surface grab sample had a maximum mercury concentration that was
between one and two times greater that the PEC (HT18-24); and one surface grab sample had a
maximum mercury concentration that was greater than two times the PEC (HT 18-32). The
maximum mercury concentration found in a surface sample was found at location HT18-32
(2.8 mg/kg).
For the core samples, 10 locations had a maximum mercury concentration in at least one depth
interval that was greater than the TEC and below the PEC (HT 18-02, -06, -07, -09, -11,-12, -13,
-20, -27, and -32). Four locations had a maximum mercury concentration in at least one depth
interval that was between one and two times greater than the PEC (HT18-03, -05, -08, and -30);
and three locations had a maximum mercury concentration in at least one depth interval that was
greater than three times the PEC (HT18-18, -198, and -25). The maximum subsurface mercury
concentration detected in the Harbortown Upstream Area was at HT18-18 in the 0- to 1.9-ft
depth interval (4.8 mg/kg).
Nickel
Figure 3-10 shows the distribution of nickel SQG exceedances (TEC is 22.7 mg/kg; PEC is
48.6 mg/kg) in the Harbortown Upstream Area. In this area, fifteen surface grab samples had a
maximum nickel concentration that was greater that the TEC and below the PEC (HT 18-01, -02,
-06, -08, -09, -11, -12, -13, -16, -18, -23, -25, -30, -31, and -32). Two surface grab samples had a
maximum nickel concentration that was between one and two times greater that the PEC (HT18-
03 and HT 18-05). The maximum nickel concentration found in a surface sample was found at
location HT18-03 (58.8 mg/kg).
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-11
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
For the core samples, 13 locations had a maximum nickel concentration in at least one depth
interval that was greater than the TEC and below the PEC (HT18-01, -02, -08, -11, -13, -15, -17,
-18, -19, -20, -24, -25, and -31). Seven locations had a maximum nickel concentration in at least
one depth interval that was between one and two times greater than the PEC (HT18-05, -06, -07,
-09, -12, -27, and -30); and one location had a maximum nickel concentration in at least one
depth interval that was greater than two times the PEC (HT18-03). The maximum subsurface
nickel concentration detected in the Harbortown Upstream Area was at HT18-03 in the 3- to 4.6-
ft depth interval (101 mg/kg).
Silver
Figure 3-11 shows the distribution of silver SQG exceedances (TEC is 1.6 mg/kg; PEC is
2.2 mg/kg) in the Harbortown Upstream Area. In this area, none of the surface grab sample
silver concentrations exceeded the TEC. The maximum silver concentration found in a surface
sample was found at location HT18-03 (0.72 mg/kg).
For the core samples, two locations had a maximum silver concentration in at least one depth
interval that was greater than the TEC and below the PEC (HT18-05 and-19). Four locations had
a maximum silver concentration in at least one depth interval that was between one and two
times greater than the PEC (HT18-06, -07, -18, and -25); and one location had a maximum silver
concentration in at least one depth interval that was greater than two times the PEC (HT18-03).
The maximum subsurface silver concentration detected in the Harbortown Upstream Area was at
HT18-03 in the 1- to 3-ft depth interval (4.8 mg/kg).
Zinc
Figure 3-12 shows the distribution of zinc SQG exceedances (TEC is 121 mg/kg; PEC is
459 mg/kg) in the Harbortown Upstream Area. In this area, 14 surface grab samples had a
maximum zinc concentration that was greater that the TEC and below the PEC (HT 18-05, -06, -
08, -09, -11, -12, -13, -16, -18, -23, -24, -25, -26, and -30). One surface grab sample had a
maximum zinc concentration that was between one and two times greater that the PEC (HT18-
03). The maximum zinc concentration found in a surface sample was found at location HT 18-03
(587 mg/kg).
For the core samples, three locations had a maximum zinc concentration in at least one depth
interval that was greater than the TEC and below the PEC (HT18-08, -09, and -11). Nine
locations had a maximum zinc concentration in at least one depth interval that was between one
and two times greater than the PEC (HT18-05, -06, -07, -12, -13, -18, -19, -25, and -30); and one
location had a maximum zinc concentration in at least one depth interval that was greater than
two times the PEC (HT18-03). The maximum subsurface zinc concentration detected in the
Harbortown Upstream Area was at HT18-03 in the 3- to 4.6-ft depth interval (1,010 mg/kg).
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-12
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
3.2.2.6 Ratio of Simultaneously Extracted Metals to Acid Volatile Sulfide
A total of 29 surface grab samples and three FDs were submitted for the ratio of SEM to AVS
analysis. The SEM/AVS ratio was calculated for samples from 31 of the 32 samples that were
submitted for analysis but could not be calculated for HT18-14 because AVS was not detected.
Three samples had an SEM/AVS ratio greater than or equal to 1 (HT18-10, -17, and -19). This
indicates that metals may be bioavailable and there is potential for toxicity to benthic organisms.
All SEM/AVS results are presented in Table 3-6. These data were used for derivation of the
ESBTUs presented in Chapter 4.
3.2.2.7 Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Results for DRO and ORO are presented in Table 3-7. The highest concentration of DRO
(C10-C20) was detected in the surface grab sample from location HT18-03 (930 mg/kg). The
highest concentration of ORO (C20-C36) was also detected in the surface grab sample from
HT18-03 (1,300 mg/kg).
DRO (C10-C20) and ORO (C20-C36) concentrations were summed (by location) to create a TPH
concentration (TPH [DRO+ORO]) for each location. Figure 3-13 presents the distribution of
TPH (DRO+ORO) results in the Harbortown Upstream Area. For the evaluation purposes of this
report, TPH (DRO+ORO) sample results were compared to values of 100, 1,000, 5,000, and
10,000 mg/kg. There were no locations with TPH values greater than 5,000 mg/kg; HT18-03
was the only location with a TPH (DRO+ORO) value between 1,000 and 5,000 mg/kg;
21 locations had TPH values between 100 and 1,000 mg/kg (HT18-05, -06, -07, -08, -09, -11,
-12, -14, -15, -16, -18, -19, -20, -21, -24, -25, -26, -29, -30, -31, and -32); and seven locations
had a TPH value less than 100 mg/kg (HT18-01, -02, -04, -10, -13, -17, and -23).
DRO and ORO Results Compared to Sample-Specific Risk Screening Levels
At present, there are no recognized cleanup goals for petroleum in sediment that are protective of
aquatic receptors. A report prepared for the Massachusetts Department of Environmental
Protection - Office of Research and Standards, titled Sediment Toxicity of Petroleum
Hydrocarbon Fractions (Battelle 2007), proposes an approach for the development of sediment
benchmarks based on the equilibrium partitioning theory. This theory, "states that the toxicity of
hydrocarbons in sediments to benthic organisms is caused by the hydrocarbons that partition
from the organic fraction of sediment particles into pore water and from pore water into the
tissues of sediment-dwelling organisms" (Battelle 2007). Equilibrium partitioning sediment
benchmarks were derived for fractions (classes or groupings of compounds with similar chemical
and toxicological properties) using the final chronic aquatic toxicity value (derived in Battelle
2007 based on a logarithmic relationship between existing toxicological data and known values
of the octanol-water partition coefficient), the sediment organic carbon/water partition
coefficient, and the fraction of organic carbon in sediment.
There are uncertainties in using the equilibrium partitioning theory to develop sediment
benchmarks for petroleum, such as the wide range of aromatic hydrocarbon toxicity data for both
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-13
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
marine and freshwater species, as well as various test durations. Additionally, the aqueous
solubility of hydrocarbons used in the DRO and ORO fractions are below the estimated acute
toxicity values; the benchmarks are conservative. Where the benchmarks are exceeded, it is
"difficult to distinguish between toxicological effects and potential physical impacts," and
further site evaluation is necessary (Battelle 2007).
Sediment benchmarks were derived using the following equation:
Sediment Benchmark (mg/kg) = Koc x FCV x foc (0.001)
where:
Koc = Sediment organic carbon/water partition coefficient.
FCV = Final chronic value.
foc = Fraction of organic carbon in sediment. An foc of 0.1 percent (0.001) was used to
give the most conservative estimated benchmark.
The sediment benchmarks presented in the following table were used to evaluate DRO and ORO
results in the Harbortown Upstream Area:
Hydrocarbon
Geometric
Final Chronic
Sediment Benchmark
Fraction
Mean Log KoW
Koc
Value (jig/L)
(mg/kg f„c)
C13 - Cig (DRO)
8.57
1.10 x 108
0.05(a)
5,543
C19 - C36 (ORO)
11.64
8.32 x 1010
0.000 iw
9,883
(a) The fraction is not likely toxic because the mean LC50 (lethal concentration required to cause mortality
to 50 percent of test organisms) exceeds mean aqueous solubility.
Source: Table 6, Sediment Toxicity of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fractions (Battelle 2007).
NOTES: foc
Fraction of organic carbon in sediment.
Koc =
Sediment organic carbon/water partition coefficient.
K-ow
Octanol-water partition coefficient.
Results from the site were provided as DRO C10-C20 and ORO C20-C36. Consequently, for the
purposes of the comparison of site results with sample-specific risk screening values, DRO
C13-C 18 and ORO C 19-C36 were used, respectively.
The following equation was used to determine the SSRSLs:
SSRSL = Sediment Benchmark (mg/kg) x Fraction of Organic Carbon in Sediment (foc)
This example calculation uses the DRO (C10-C20) results of FD for surface sample HT18-03 (the
maximum detected result for DRO in the Harbortown Upstream Area):
HT18-03-SURF SSRSL = 5543 mg/kg (sediment benchmark) x 0.0531
(foc for HT18-03-SURF) = 294 mg/kg
Harbortown Upstream Area Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-14
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
Table 3-7 and Figure 3-14 (DRO) and 3-15 (ORO) present the comparison of results to the
calculated DRO and ORO SSRSLs.
In the Harbortown Upstream Area, 12 locations (HT18-03, -05, -10, -12, -15, -16, -19, -20, -21, -
24, -26, and -29) had DRO concentrations exceeding the SSRSL. Three locations had DRO
concentrations that were between three and four times the respective SSRL (HT18-03, -19, and -
29); four locations had DRO concentrations that were between two and three times the respective
SSRL (HT18-10, -15, -21, and -26); and five locations had DRO concentrations that were
between one and two times the respective SSRL (HT18-05, -12, -16, -20, and -24) (Figure 3-14).
Nine locations had ORO concentrations exceeding the SSRSL. Five locations had DRO
concentrations that were between two and three times the respective SSRL (HT18-03, -19, -21, -
26, and -29); and four locations had DRO concentrations that were between one and two times
the respective SSRL (HT18-05, -10, -15, and -24) (Figure 3-15).
3.2.2.8 Cyanide
A total of 29 surface grab samples and three FDs were submitted for WAD cyanide and total
cyanide analysis and the results are presented in Table 3-8. WAD cyanide was detected in five
of 32 samples submitted for analysis, including FDs. WAD cyanide concentrations ranged from
0.81 mg/kg (HT18-04) to 1.3 mg/kg (HT18-03). Of the total samples submitted, five samples
had concentrations that exceeded the EPA Region 5 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA) screening value for WAD cyanide at 0.1 mg/kg (HT18-02, -03, -04, -05, and -32).
Total cyanide was detected in four of 32 samples submitted for analysis. Total cyanide
concentrations ranged from 0.83 mg/kg (HT18-19) to 2.7 mg/kg (HT18-06). Of the total
samples submitted, three samples had concentrations that exceeded the EPA Region 5 RCRA
screening value for total cyanide at 0.1 mg/kg (HT18-06, -16, and -19).
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-15
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
This page intentionally left blank
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 4-1
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
4. EQUILIBRIUM PARTITIONING SEDIMENT BENCHMARKS
PAH ESBTUs were calculated as an additional tool for evaluating potential risk associated with
sediment contamination. ESBTUs are used to estimate whether there is potential ecological risk
associated with exposure to pore water that is in equilibrium with a measured concentration of
the contaminant in the sediment. Thus, ESBTUs are calculated using an assumed relationship
for partitioning between sediment and water.
4.1 POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS
ESBTUs for total 34 PAHs were calculated following the methods outlined in Procedures for the
Derivation of ESBs for the Protection of Benthic Organisms: PAH Mixtures (EPA 2003a).
Based on this guidance, individual PAH concentrations in sediment were first divided by the
fraction of organic carbon measured in the sediment sample, resulting in an organic carbon-based
PAH concentration, or normalized concentration:
_ cPAHi
^NormalizedPAHi ~ f
Joe
CNormalizedPAHi = Normalized individual PAH concentration.
CPAHi = Individual PAH concentration in sediment.
foc = Fraction of organic carbon in sediment.
This value was then compared to the maximum solubility of that PAH in sediment on an organic
carbon basis (EPA 2003a). To be conservative, the lesser of the two values was used to calculate
the PAH ESBTU. This value was then divided by the individual PAH's effective concentration
in sediment, defined as the product of its final chronic value and organic carbon-water partition
coefficient (Koc), resulting in an Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmark for each
individual PAH.
rren ^NormalizedPAHi or Kmax
noDpAHi ~ ~
ESBpahi = Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmark for each individual PAH.
CNormalizedPAHi = Normalized individual PAH concentration.
KMax = Maximum solubility concentration.
CEC = PAH's effective concentration in sediment (provided in Table 3-4 from
EPA 2003a).
The PAH ESBTU for a sediment sample is the sum of the 34 individual PAHs' ESBTUs
(Table 4-1).
^ESBTUfcv = ^ 34 ESBPAHi
Typically, a PAH ESBTU less than or equal to 1 indicates that benthic organisms are not
expected to be harmed by contamination present in the sediments (EPA 2003a). To better
evaluate the results, the following PAH ESBTUs ranges were used: ESBTUs less than 1,
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 4-2
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
between 1 and 7.5, between 7.5 and 10, and equal to or greater than 10. The samples with PAH
ESBTUs greater than 1 may be toxic to aquatic life. Calculated PAH ESBTU results for each
analyzed sample are provided in Table 4-1. Results from the PAH ESBTU calculations from the
Harbortown Upstream Area are presented in Figure 4-1.
In the Harbortown Upstream area, three surface grab sample locations had PAH ESBTU between
1 and 7.5 (HT18-10, -19, and -29). All the remaining surface grab sample locations had PAH
ESBTU values that were less than 1.
In the core samples, 18 locations had a subsurface sample PAH ESBTU greater than 1 in at least
one core depth interval. At HT18-19, the maximum PAH ESBTU value was greater than 10 in
at least one subsurface depth interval; and at 17 locations, the maximum PAH ESBTU value was
between 1 and 7.5 in at least one depth interval (HT19-01, -02, -03, -05, -06, -07, -08, -12, -13,
-14, -18, -20, -25, -26, -27, -29, and -30).
4.2 METALS
Metal toxicity is evaluated through an indirect estimate of toxicity based on the concentrations of
AVS and SEM, as well as TOC in the sediments. Metal ESBTUs were calculated following the
methods outlined in Procedures for the Derivation of ESBs for the Protection of Benthic
Organisms: Metal Mixtures (Cadmium, Copper, Lead, Nickel, Silver, and Zinc) (EPA 2005).
The molar concentration of AVS was subtracted from the molar concentration of the sum of the
SEM measured in each sediment sample, and the result was divided by the fraction of organic
carbon, accounting for preferential sorption of metals to organic carbon. It should be noted that
if the particular sample has excess AVS such that all SEM is accounted for, this value can be
negative.
YSEM - AVS
ESBTUMetais — -
Joe
ESBTUMetais = Metal ESBTU.
YjSEM — AVS = Difference between sum of SEM and AVS.
foc = Fraction of organic carbon in sediment.
As presented in the EPA 2005 guidance, when metals ESBTUs are calculated using this method,
a value less than 130 |imol of residual SEM per gram organic carbon (goc) indicates that the
sediment poses a low risk of adverse biological effects associated with metals. Values between
130 and 3,000 |imol/goc may have adverse effects, and values greater than 3,000 |imol/goc are
expected to be associated with adverse effects.
ESBTU results for metals did not exceeded 130 |imol/gocin surface grab samples from any
location throughout the Harbortown Upstream Area (Table 4-2).
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
Page 5-1
June 2019
5. PROBABLE EFFECTS CONCENTRATION QUOTIENTS
As described in the Prediction of Sediment Toxicity Using Census-Based Freshwater Sediment
Quality Guidelines (EPA 2000) guidance, PEC-Qs combine data from multiple constituents in
sediments into one unitless index, and thus can be used in comparing the quality of sediments
from different locations and at different times. As discussed in Ingersoll et al. (2001), PEC-Qs
are used to evaluate the combined effects of chemical mixtures on the toxicity of sediments to
benthic organisms. They use consensus based freshwater SQGs to calculate concentration
quotients (or hazard quotients) defined as measured sediment concentrations divided by the
specific SQG for that particular chemical or metal. The principle of PEC-Qs is to calculate the
geometric mean of all quotients for that particular sediment sample including those for metals,
PAHs, and PCBs.
When the geometric mean PEC-Q is regressed with the percent of toxicity found in that sample
(typically growth or mortality), as shown in Ingersoll et al. (2001), and the geometric mean of
the PEC-Qs is approximately 1, between 30 and 50 percent of the organisms showed a toxic
effect. This could be termed the Effect Concentration for 30 or 50 percent, respectively. This
means that between 50 and 70 percent of the organisms should not show an effect when the
PEC-Q is 1. Examination of the proportion of toxicity when the PEC-Q is 0.5 shows that
between 6 and 35 percent of the organisms showed a toxic effect, again meaning that between
94 and 65 percent of the organisms did not show a toxic effect when the PEC-Q was 0.5. The
important aspects related to the use of PEC-Qs are:
1. The toxic endpoint is not necessarily lethality, but often the endpoint is a chronic
endpoint such as growth.
2. The use of a PEC-Q of 1 does not imply that 100 percent of organisms exposed to those
concentrations will show an effect (chronic or acute), rather that 30-50 percent of those
organisms will show the effects, and the rest will not be impacted.
3. The proportion of organisms that show an effect drops to 6-35 percent when the PEC-Q
of 0.5 is used.
Consensus-based PECs were used to predict the potential for toxicity in sediments collected from
the Harbortown Upstream Area. Mean PEC-Qs were calculated using the procedure that was
established by EPA (2000) to determine the concentration of constituents above which adverse
effects are likely to be observed to sediment-dwelling organisms. A PEC-Q was first determined
for each of seven metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, and zinc) based on
the available PEC.
PEC — Q metals =
metal concentration (in dry weight)
corresponding PEC value
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 5-2
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
Then, an average PEC-Q for metals was calculated by summing the PEC-Qs of each metal and
dividing by the number of metals that were included in the calculation (EPA 2000).
£ individual metal PEC — Qs
mean PEC — Q metals =
n
where
n = Number of metals in the calculation with available sediment chemistry data and PECs.
PEC-Qs were also calculated for total 17 PAHs using a value equal to one-half the RL for NDs
(ND = V2 RL), and total PCBs using a value of zero for the NDs (ND=0). Nine of the 17 PAHs
had PEC values and were used in the PEC-Q calculation: anthracene, benzo(a)anthracene,
benzo(a)pyrene, chrysene, dibenzo(a, h)anthracene, fluoranthene, fluorene, naphthalene,
phenanthrene, and pyrene.
1
total PAH concentraton (ND = RL)(in dry weight)
PEC — Q total PAHs =
PEC — Q total PCBs =
corresponding PEC value
total PCB concentraton (ND = 0)(in dry weight)
corresponding PEC value
A mean PEC-Q was calculated by summing the average PEC-Q for metals, the PEC-Q for
PAHs, and the PEC-Q for PCBs.
mean PEC — Q metals + PEC — Q total PAHs + PEC — Q total PCBs
mean PEC - Q = - - -
n
where
n = Number of sediment classes of chemicals for which sediment chemistry data are
available.
The mean PEC-Q was determined for each sediment sample to provide an overall measure of
chemical contamination and to support an evaluation of the combined potential effects of
multiple constituents in the sediment collected from the site (EPA 2000).
The mean PEC-Q values for each sample collected are summarized in Table 5-1. The mean
PEC-Qs ranged from 0.03 in the 1- to 3-ft interval at location HT18-23 to 3.41 in the 7- to 8-ft
interval at location HT18-06 (Table 5-1, Figure 5-1). The mean PEC-Q for each sediment
sample was compared to benchmarks of 0.5, 1, and 5.
In the surface grab samples from the Harbortown Upstream Area, all the locations had mean
PEC-Q values between 0 and 0.5. In the core samples, eight locations had a PEC-Q in at least
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 5-3
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
one depth interval that was between one and five (HT18-03, -05, -06, -07, -08, -18, -19, and -25);
five locations had a maximum PEC-Q value in at least one depth interval that was between 0.5
and 1 (HT18-09, -12, -14, -27, and -30); and the remaining locations had subsurface samples
with PEC-Q values between 0 and 0.5.
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 5-4
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
This page intentionally left blank
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 6-1
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
6. SPATIAL ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE HOT SPOTS WITHIN THE
HARBORTOWN UPSTREAM AREA
To determine the location of hot spots within the Harbortown Upstream Area of the Detroit
River AOC, three datasets were spatially interpolated to develop an estimate of the level and
distribution of elevated concentrations of constituents across the study area: (1) all individual
constituents (Section 3.2.3) with concentrations exceeding their respective PEC in sediment
samples, (2) the calculated PAH ESBTUs (Section 4.1), and (3) the calculated PEC-Qs
(Chapter 5). Metals ESBTU results (Section 4.2) are referenced but were not included as inputs
for spatial analysis. This methodology is consistent with previous projects and facilitate direct
comparison between studies (Section 6.6). Hot spot determination allows for prioritizing areas
to be targeted for further investigation or remediation.
Interpolation was performed by using a spatially explicit statistical method called kriging, as
described in Section 6.1. Section 6.2 describes the kriging analysis results for concentrations of
all constituents with a PEC, Section 6.3 describes the kriging analysis results for PAH ESBTUs,
and Section 6.4 describes the kriging analysis results for PEC-Qs. Section 6.5 describes the
classification and priority assessment of hot spots based on kriging results.
6.1 METHODOLOGY
A three-dimensional model of each analyte measured in the sediment samples was constructed
using the statistical interpolation method of kriging with C-Tech's Earth Volumetric Studio,
Version 2019.3.0.
Input included each analyte's concentration at every location, and the results were combined to
identify all areas with one or more detections above the respective PEC levels, two times above
the PEC levels, and three times above the PEC levels. To further define the hot spot areas
identified from modeling all constituents, additional inputs included the calculated PAH
ESBTUs and PEC-Qs; these were modeled separately to identify areas with PAH ESBTUs of
between 1 and 7.5, between 7.5 and 10, and equal to or greater than 10, and to identify areas with
PEC-Qs between 0.5 and 1 and equal to or greater than 1. Although ESBTUs were also
calculated for metals, these data were not included in the model inputs for the spatial analysis
because only three results (one of which was an FD) exceeded the thresholds discussed in
Section 4.2, and these results occurred within the hot spots identified in Section 6.2.
6.2 MODEL RESULTS FOR ALL PROBABLE EFFECT CONCENTRATION
CONSTITUENTS IN THE HARBORTOWN UPSTREAM AREA
Concentrations of all individual constituents were input to the model, and the kriging analysis
identified areas with PEC exceedances of total PCBs, total 17 PAHs, and/or each of the 10
metals that have PECs. Five non-continuous hot spots were identified within the study where
one or more analytes were present in concentrations exceeding three times the PEC.
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 6-2
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
Figures 6-1 and 6-2 present the results for all constituents exceeding their respective PECs in the
Harbortown Upstream Area. The estimated volume of sediment with elevated concentrations of
constituents exceeding their respective PECs for each hot spot along with the predominant
constituent contributing to the elevated concentrations is provided in the figure. The volume
estimates do not include contingency or overburden; however, they are subject to the
uncertainties of the study design and modeling limitations.
• Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 1—Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 1 includes locations
HT18-03, -05, -06, -07, -08, and -09. The estimated volume of sediment with constituent
concentrations exceeding the PEC is approximately 413,519 cy (Figure 6-1).
Constituents for which the PEC exceedances are occurring within Hot Spot 1 include
total PCBs, total 17 PAHs, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel,
silver, and zinc (Figure 6-2, Table 6-1). The predominant constituents contributing to the
elevated concentrations are total PCBs (HT18-03 and -06), total 17 PAHs (HT18-08),
cadmium (HT18-03 and 07), and lead (HT18-03, -05, and -06), which all exceed three
times the PEC within Hot Spot 1. Total PCBs (HT18-05 and -07), cadmium (HT18-06),
nickel (HT18-03), silver (HT18-03), and zinc (HT18-03) had concentrations exceeding
two times the PEC while all other remaining constituents found in this area had
concentrations below two times the PEC.
• Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 2—Harbortown Hot Spot 2 includes locations HT 18-12,
-13, and -14. The estimated volume of sediment with constituent concentrations
exceeding the PEC is approximately 166,389 cy (Figure 6-1). Constituents for which the
PEC exceedances are occurring within Hot Spot 2 include total 17 PAHs, cadmium,
copper, lead, nickel, and zinc (Figure 6-2, Table 6-1). The predominant constituent
contributing to the elevated concentrations is cadmium, which all exceeded three times
the PEC in HT18-13 and are between one and two times the PEC in HT18-12. Lead had
concentrations exceeding two times the PEC in HT18-12, and all other remaining
constituents found in this area had concentrations below two times the PEC.
• Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 3—Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 3 includes locations
HT18-16, -18,-19, -20, and -21. The estimated volume of sediment with constituent
concentrations exceeding the PEC is approximately 30,699 cy (Figure 6-1). Constituents
for which the PEC exceedances are occurring within Hot Spot 3 include Total 17 PAHs,
cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, silver, and zinc (Figure 6-2, Table 6-1). The
predominant constituents contributing to the elevated concentrations are total 17 PAHs,
lead, and mercury, which all exceed three times the PEC in HT18-18 and -19. Cadmium,
copper, and lead had concentrations exceeding two times the PEC in other locations
within Hot Spot 3, while all other remaining constituents found in this area had
concentrations below two times the PEC.
• Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 4—Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 4 includes locations
HT 18-24 and -25. The estimated volume of sediment with constituent concentrations
exceeding the PEC is approximately 22,976 cy (Figure 6-1). Constituents for which the
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 6-3
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
PEC exceedances are occurring within Hot Spot 4 include total 17 PAHs, cadmium,
copper, lead, mercury, silver, and zinc. The predominant constituents contributing to the
elevated concentrations are total 17 PAHs, lead, and mercury, which all exceed three
times the PEC in HT18-25 (Figure 6-2, Table 6-1). Cadmium had concentrations
exceeding two times the PEC in HT18-15 while all other remaining constituents found in
this area had concentrations below two times the PEC.
• Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 5—The Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 5 included
locations HT18-27, and -30. The estimated volume of sediment with constituent
concentrations exceeding the PEC is approximately 201,956 cy (Figure 6-1).
Constituents for which the PEC exceedances are occurring within Hot Spot 5 include
Total 17 PAHs, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, nickel, and zinc (Figure 6-2, Table
6-1). The predominant constituent contributing to the elevated concentrations is
Cadmium, which exceeds three times the PEC in HT18-30. All other remaining
constituents found in this area had concentrations below two times the PEC.
6.3 MODEL RESULTS FOR POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBON
EQUILIBRIUM PARTITIONING SEDIMENT BENCHMARK TOXIC UNITS
FOR THE HARBORTOWN UPSTREAM AREA
A kriging analysis was performed to identify areas with PAH ESBTUs equal to or greater than 1
within some of the hot spot areas identified when all constituents with a PEC were kriged
(Section 6.2). Figure 6-3 presents the results for PAH ESBTUs exceeding 1 overlain with the
Harbortown Upstream Hot Spots 1-5.
PAH ESBTU values greater than 1 are primarily in the same areas as the five hot spots that had
constituents exceeding three times the PEC, identified in Section 6.2; however, some PAH
ESBTU values extend upstream from Hot Spot 1 and Hot Spot 5.
6.3.1 Spatial Analysis for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Equilibrium Partitioning
Sediment Benchmark Toxic Units in Harbortown Upstream Area
Figure 6-3 presents areas identified with elevated PAH ESBTUs, maximum PAH ESBTU values
at each sample location, and the overlap of the spatial analysis for PAH ESBTUs with hot spots
identified in the Harbortown Upstream Area using all PEC constituents depicted in Figure 6-1.
The spatial analysis for PAH ESBTUs identified a continuous area including eight locations
(HT18-01 to -08) that have ESBTU values greater than one and is located within Hot Spot 1 but
extending upstream to HT18-01. A continuous area including two locations (HT18-12 and -13)
and a single location (HT18-14) both have ESBTU values greater than one and are identified
within Hot Spot 2. A continuous area including three sample locations (HT18-18, -19, and -20)
is located within Hot Spot 3 and has PAH ESBTUs greater than one at HT18-18, and -20, and a
PAH ESBTU value greater than 7.5 at HT18-19. Two individual areas (HT18-24 and -25) both
have PAH ESBTU values greater than one and are located within Hot Spot 4. Finally, one
continuous area including three sample locations (HT18-27, -28, -19) has PAH ESBTU values
greater than one and is located in Hot Spot 5 but extending upstream toward HT18-18.
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
Page 6-4
June 2019
Two sample locations (HT18-10 and -26) have a PAH ESBTU value greater than one but are not
included in a hot spot. Ten of 30 locations in the Harbortown Upstream Area had PAH ESBTU
ratios less than 1 (HT18-09, -11, -15, -16, -17, -21, -23, -24, -31, and -32).
6.4 MODEL RESULTS FOR PROBABLE EFFECTS CONCENTRATION
QUOTIENTS FOR THE HARBORTOWN UPSTREAM AREA
In addition to constituent concentrations and PAH ESBTUs, PEC-Qs were also modeled. The
kriging analysis identified areas with PEC-Qs equal to or greater than 0.5 within some of the hot
spot areas that were identified when constituents were kriged (Section 6.2). Figure 6-4 presents
the results for PEC-Qs exceeding 0.5 overlain with the Harbortown Upstream Hot Spots 1-5.
6.4.1 Spatial Analysis for Probable Effects Concentration Quotients in the Harbortown
Upstream Area
Figure 6-4 presents areas identified with elevated PEC-Qs, maximum PEC-Q values at each
sample location, and the overlap of the spatial analysis for PEC-Qs with hot spots identified
using all PEC constituents depicted in Figure 6-1. The spatial analysis for PEC-Qs identified
three sample locations where sediment samples had PEC-Q values greater than 0.5 (HT18-09, -
27, and -30, which correspond to Hot Spots 1, 5, and 5 respectively). Three sample locations
also identified with sediment samples had PEC-Q values greater than one (HT18-05, -06, and -
07, which correspond to Hot Spot 1). These areas identified with elevated PEC-Qs are all
located within a hot spot and have an area less than the total hot spot identified using all PEC
constituents in Section 6.2.
6.5 CLASSIFICATION OF HOT SPOTS BASED ON ALL KRIGING RESULTS IN
THE HARBORTOWN UPSTREAM AREA
The hot spot areas identified in Section 6.2 can be prioritized for further investigation and
potential remediation efforts when considered with the results of the spatial analyses of PAH
ESBTUs and PEC-Qs. Hot spots are further categorized as Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3 based on
the following criteria:
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
• Level 3 - lowest impact
— Contaminant results are > 3 x PEC OR
— PEC-Q > 0.5, OR
— ESBTU > 1.
• Level 2
— Contaminant results are > 3 x PEC OR
— PEC-Q > 1, OR
— ESBTU >7.5.
• Level 1 - highest impact
— Contaminant results are > 3 x PEC OR
— PEC-Q > 5, OR
— ESBTU >7.5.
This categorization is based on the presence of elevated levels of contaminants and is not a
comparative evaluation of the impact of different classes of contaminants. When determining the
appropriate level classification for a contaminated area, Level 3 criteria (lowest impact) must be
met before classifying a Level 2 hotspot, and Level 2 criteria must be met before classifying a
Level 1 hotspot (highest impact). Because the PEC metric is the same for each hotspot level
determination, if a hotspot in question has a PEC > 3, the PEC-Q and ESBTU metrics will be
used to determine the appropriate hotspot classification. The ESBTU metric is also the same for
the Level 2 and Level 1 hotspot determination, so if a hotspot in question has an ESBTU > 7.5,
the PEC-Q value will be used to determine the appropriate hotspot classification. Level 1 hot
spot areas have the largest estimated volumes of sediment with COCs exceeding the PEC. Level
3 hot spot areas have less elevated contaminant concentrations and, in some cases, smaller
estimated sediment volumes exceeding the PEC. This section presents additional details on each
of the three hot spot areas, presented within their respective levels. Table 6-1 presents maximum
PEC exceedances in any interval for all constituents for sample locations and hot spots within the
Harbortown Upstream Area. Table 6-2 presents maximum PAH ESBTUs in any interval for
sample locations and hot spots within the Harbortown Upstream Area. Table 6-3 presents
maximum PEC-Qs in any interval for sample locations and hot spots within the Harbortown
Upstream Area.
6.5.1 Level 1 Hot Spots
To be considered Level 1, hot spots must have at least one of the following three conditions: a
contaminant result that is equal to or greater than three times the respective PEC, a PEC-Q value
equal to or greater than 5, or an ESBTU equal to or greater than 7.5. Level 2 criteria must be met
before classifying a Level 1 hotspot (highest impact). There are no Hot Spots within the
Harbortown Upstream area that are classified as Level 1 Hot Spots.
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
Page 6-5
June 2019
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 6-6
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
6.5.2 Level 2 Hot Spots
To be considered Level 2, hot spots must have at least one of the following three conditions: a
contaminant result that is equal to or greater than three times the respective PEC, a PEC-Q value
equal to or greater than 1, or an ESBTU equal to or greater than 7.5. Level 3 criteria (lowest
impact) must be met before classifying a Level 2 hotspot. Harbortown Upstream Hot Spots 1,3,
and 4 all meet the Level 2 criteria.
6.5.2.1 Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 1
The Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 1 includes six sample locations (Figure 6-2, Table 6-1).
The COCs exceeding three times the PEC for this hot spot area are total 17 PAHs, total PCBs,
and two metals (cadmium and lead).
Total 17 PAHs concentrations exceeded three times the PEC at HT18-8 and did not exceed the
PEC in any other location within Hot Spot 1 (Figure 6-2). Of the intervals analyzed, total 17
PAHs concentrations exceeding three times the PEC in Hot Spot 1 were present to a maximum
depth interval of 2-4.5 ft (HT18-08). Total PCB concentrations exceeded three times the PEC at
two sample locations (HT18-03 and -06) (Figure 6-2, Table 6-1). Of the intervals analyzed, total
PCB concentrations exceeding three times the PEC in Hot Spot 1 were present to a
maximum depth interval of 7-8 ft (HT18-06). Cadmium concentrations exceeded three times the
PEC at two sample locations (HT 18-03 and -07). Of the intervals analyzed, cadmium
concentrations exceeding three times the PEC in Hot Spot 1 were present to a maximum depth
interval of 1-4.8 ft (HT18-07). Lead concentrations exceeded three times the PEC at two sample
locations (HT18-03 and -05). Of the intervals analyzed, lead concentrations exceeding three
times the PEC in Hot Spot 1 were present to a maximum depth interval of 2.7-5.1 ft (HT18-05).
Of the six locations in Hot Spot 1, total 17 PAHs exceeded the PEC at one location (HT 18-08);
total PCBs exceeded the PEC at four locations (HT18-03, -05, -06, and -07; arsenic exceeded the
PEC at 1 location (HT18-08); cadmium exceeded the PEC at four locations (HT18-03, -05, -06,
and -07); chromium exceeded the PEC at three locations (HT18-03, -06, and -07); copper
exceeded the PEC at two locations (HT 18-03 and -05); lead exceeded the PEC at five locations
(HT18-03, -05, -06, -07, and -08); mercury exceeded the PEC at three locations (HT18-03, -05,
and -08); nickel exceeded the PEC at four locations (HT18-03, -05, -06, and -07); silver
exceeded the PEC at three locations (HT 18-03, -06, and -07); and zinc exceeded the PEC at four
locations (HT18-03, -05, -06, and -07). No metals exceeded the PEC in HT18-04. The highest
concentrations of all constituents were detected in the subsurface samples. The highest
concentrations of total 17 PAHs, arsenic, and mercury were detected in HT 18-08; the highest
concentration of total PCBs was detected in HT 18-06; and the highest concentrations of
cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, silver, and zinc were detected in HT18-03.
Five sample locations in Hot Spot 1 had PAH ESBTUs between 1 and 7.5 (Figure 6-3, Table
6-2) and all six sample locations had metal ESBTUs less than 130 |imol/goc. Four sample
locations in Hot Spot 1 had PEC-Q values between one and five, and one sample location had
PEC-Q values between 0.5 and 1 (Figure 6-4, Table 6-3).
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 6-7
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
6.5.2.2 Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 3
The Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 3 includes five sample locations (Figure 6-2, Table 6-1).
The COCs that exceed three times the PEC for this hot spot area are total 17 PAHs, and two
metals (lead and mercury).
Total 17 PAHs concentrations exceeded three times the PEC at two locations (HT18-18 and -19)
(Figure 6-2, Table 6-1). Of the intervals analyzed, total 17 PAHs concentrations exceeding
three times the PEC in Hot Spot 3 were present to a maximum depth interval of 1-1.9 ft (HT18-
18). Lead concentrations exceeded three times the PEC at two sample locations (HT18-18 and -
19) (Figure 6-2, Table 6-1). Of the intervals analyzed, lead concentrations exceeding three times
the PEC in Hot Spot 3 were present to a maximum depth interval of 0-1.9 ft (HT18-18).
Mercury concentrations exceeded three times the PEC at two locations (HT18-18 and -19)
(Figure 6-1, Table 6-1). Of the intervals analyzed, mercury concentrations exceeding three times
the PEC in Hot Spot 3 were present to a maximum depth interval of 1-1.9 ft (HT18-18).
Of the five locations in Hot Spot 3, total 17 PAHs exceeded the PEC in two locations (HT18-18
and -19); cadmium exceeded the PEC at two locations (HT18-18 and -19); copper exceeded the
PEC at two locations (HT18-18 and -19); lead exceeded the PEC at five locations (HT18-16, -18,
-19, -20, and -21); mercury exceeded the PEC at two locations (HT18-18 and -19); silver
exceeded the PEC at one location (HT18-18); and zinc exceeded the PEC at two locations
(HT18-18 and -19). The highest concentrations of all constituents were detected in the
subsurface samples. The highest concentrations of total 17 PAHs and lead were detected in
HT18-19; and the highest concentrations of cadmium, copper, mercury, silver, and zinc were
detected in HT18-18
One sample location (HT18-20) in Hot Spot 3 had PAH ESBTUs between 1 and 7.5 and one
sample location (HT18-19) had PAH ESBTUs exceeding 10 (Figure 6-3, Table 6-2). No sample
locations had metal ESBTUs greater than 130 |imol/goc and two sample locations had PEC-Q
values between one and five (Figure 6-4, Table 6-3).
6.5.2.3 Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 4
The Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 4 includes HT18-24 and -25 (Figure 6-2, Table 6-1). The
COCs exceeding three times the PEC for this hot spot area are total 17 PAHs and two metals
(lead and mercury).
Total 17 PAHs concentrations exceeded three times the PEC at HT18-25. Of the intervals
analyzed, total 17 PAHs concentrations exceeding three times the PEC in Hot Spot 4 were
present to a maximum depth interval of 1-3 ft (HT 18-25). Lead concentrations exceeded three
times the PEC at HT 18-25. Of the intervals analyzed, lead concentrations exceeding three times
the PEC in Hot Spot 4 were present to a maximum depth interval of 1-3 ft (HT 18-25). Mercury
concentrations exceeded three times the PEC at HT 18-25. Of the intervals analyzed, mercury
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 6-8
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
concentrations exceeding three times the PEC in Hot Spot 4 were present to a maximum depth
interval of 1-3 ft (HT18-25).
Of the two locations in Hot Spot 4, total 17 PAHs exceeded the PEC at HT 18-25; cadmium
exceeded the PEC at HT 18-25; copper exceeded the PEC at HT 18-25; lead exceeded the PEC at
HT18-25; mercury exceeded the PEC at HT18-24 and -25; silver exceeded the PEC at HT18-25;
and zinc exceeded the PEC at HT 18-25. The highest concentrations of all constituents were
detected in the subsurface samples. The highest concentrations of total 17 PAHs, cadmium,
copper, lead, mercury, silver, and zinc were detected in HT 18-25.
HT18-25 in Hot Spot 4 had PAH ESBTUs between 1 and 7.5 (Figure 6-3, Table 6-2) and both
sample locations had metal ESBTUs less than 130 |imol/goc. HT 18-25 samples had a PEC-Q
value between one and five (Figure 6-4, Table 6-3).
6.5.3 Level 3 Hot Spots
To be considered Level 3, hot spots must have at least one of the following three conditions: a
contaminant result that is equal to or greater than three times the respective PEC, a PEC-Q value
equal to or greater than 0.5, or an ESBTU equal to or greater than 1.0. Harbortown Upstream
Hot Spots 2 and 5 both meet the Level 3 criteria.
6.5.3.1 Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 2
The Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 2 includes three locations (Figure 6-2, Table 6-1). The
COC exceeding three times the PEC for this hot spot area is cadmium. Cadmium concentrations
exceeded three times the PEC at HT18-13 and is between one and two times the PEC in HT18-
12. Of the intervals analyzed, cadmium concentrations exceeding three times the PEC in Hot
Spot 2 were present to a maximum depth interval of 1-3 ft (HT18-13).
Of the three locations in Hot Spot 2, total 17 PAHS exceeded the PEC at one location (HT18-
14); cadmium exceeded the PEC at two locations (HT18-12 and -13); copper exceeded the PEC
at one location (HT18-12); lead exceeded the PEC at two locations (HT18-12 and -13); nickel
exceeded the PEC at one location (HT18-12); and zinc exceeded the PEC at two locations
(HT18-12 and -13). The highest concentrations of all constituents were detected in the
subsurface samples. The highest concentration of cadmium was detected in HT18-13; and the
highest concentrations of copper, lead, nickel, and zinc were detected in HT18-12.
All of the sample locations in Hot Spot 2 have PAH ESBTUs between 1 and 7.5 (Figure 6-3,
Table 6-2) and all of the sample locations have metal ESBTUs less than 130 |imol/goc. Two
sample locations have PEC-Q values between 0.5 and 1 (Figure 6-4, Table 6-3).
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 6-9
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
6.5.3.2 Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 5
The Harbortown Upstream Hot Spot 5 includes three sample locations (Figure 6-2, Table 6-1).
The COC exceeding three times the PEC for this hot spot area is cadmium.
Cadmium concentrations exceeded three times the PEC in HT18-30 (Figure 6-2, Table 6-1). Of
the intervals analyzed, cadmium concentrations exceeding three times the PEC in Hot Spot 5
were present to a maximum depth interval of 7-10 ft (HT18-30).
Of the three locations in Hot Spot 5, total 17 PAHs exceeded the PEC at one location (HT18-27);
cadmium exceeded the PEC at one location (HT18-30); chromium exceeded the PEC at one
location (HT18-30); lead exceeded the PEC at one location (HT18-30); mercury exceeded the
PEC at one location (HT18-30); nickel exceeded the PEC at two locations (HT18-27, and -30)
and zinc exceeded the PEC at one location (HT18-30). No metals exceeded the PEC in
HT18-29. The highest concentrations of all constituents were detected in the subsurface
samples. The highest concentration of total 17 PAHs was detected in HT18-27; and the highest
concentrations of cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, nickel, and zinc were detected in
HT18-30.
All three sample locations in Hot Spot 5 had PAH ESBTUs between 1 and 7.5 (Figure 6-3, Table
6-2) and each location had metal ESBTUs less than 130 |imol/goc. One sample in Hot Spot 5 had
PEC-Q values between 0.5 and 1 (Figure 6-4, Table 6-3).
6.6 COMPARISON OF HARBORTOWN UPSTREAM AREA HOT SPOTS WITH
ASSESSMENTS FOR OTHER SECTIONS OF THE DETROIT RIVER AREA OF
CONCERN
The Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 criteria in Section 6.5 were also utilized to categorize hot spots
in the Riverbend Assessment of Contaminated Sediments (EA 2016a), Harbortown Assessment
of Contaminated Sediments (EA 2016b), and Mid/Lower Trenton Channel Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments (EA 2015). Different hot spot rating systems were utilized in the
Celeron Island Area Assessment of Contaminated Sediments (EA 2014a) and the River
Rouge/Ecorse Shoreline Assessment of Contaminated Sediments (EA 2014b). In the Celeron
Island Area characterization, hot spots were categorized as low or high impact. Low impact hot
spots were defined as areas having concentrations of at least one constituent exceeding its
respective PEC, while the high impact designation was applied to hot spots containing
concentrations of at least one constituent exceeding three times its respective PEC (EA 2014a).
In the River Rouge/Ecorse Shoreline characterization, hot spots were categorized as major if the
model predicted that a majority of the area within the hot spot had at least one constituent with a
concentration exceeding three times its respective PEC. Hot spots that did not satisfy the criteria
to be labeled as major were identified as other hot spots (EA 2014b).
As discussed in the previous sections, five hot spots have been identified in the Harbortown
Upstream Area. No Hotspots were designated as Level 1, three were designated as Level 2, and
two were designated as Level 3. The five Hot Spots (Level 2 and Level 3) would be identified as
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 6-10
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
high impact hot spots under the criteria utilized in the Celeron Island Area characterization and
would be identified as major hot spots according to the criteria applied in the River
Rouge/Ecorse Shoreline characterization because they all had concentrations exceeding three
times the respective PEC. In the Mid/Lower Trenton Channel, nine hot spots were identified, of
which seven were designated as Level 1, one was designated as Level 2, and one was designated
as Level 3 using the same criteria as the Harbortown designations (EA 2015).
Three hotspots were identified in the Harbortown Area, two of which are designated as Level 1,
and one of which is designated as Level 3. The two Level 1 Hot Spots would be identified as
high impact hot spots under the criteria utilized in the Celeron Island Area characterization and
would be identified as major hot spots according to the criteria applied in the River
Rouge/Ecorse Shoreline characterization. The Level 3 Hot Spot in this study would be identified
as a low impact Hot Spot under the criteria utilized in the Celeron Island Area characterization
and an "other" Hot Spot based on criteria in the River Rouge/Ecorse Shoreline study.
Four hots spots were identified in the Riverbend Area, all of which are designated as Level 1.
All four of the Riverbend Area hot spots would be identified as high impact hot spots under the
criteria utilized in the Celeron Island Area characterization. The four Riverbend Area hot spots
would all be identified as major hot spots according to the criteria applied in the River
Rouge/Ecorse Shoreline characterization.
Of the nine hot spots identified in the Mid/Lower Trenton Channel, seven would be identified as
high impact under the criteria utilized in the Celeron Island Area characterization, with the
remaining two being designated as low impact. If the criteria from the River Rouge/Ecorse
Shoreline were applied, four of the Mid/Lower Trenton Channel hot spots would be identified as
major hot spots and the remaining five would be identified as other hot spots.
In the Celeron Island Area characterization, seven hot spots were identified, of which four were
designated as high impact and three were designated as low impact (EA 2014a). If the criteria
described in Section 6.5 were applied to the seven hot spots that were identified in the Celeron
Island Area characterization, four of the hot spots would be identified as Level 1 hot spots and
three would be identified as Level 3 hot spots. If the criteria from the River Rouge/Ecorse
Shoreline characterization were applied, one of the hot spots in the Celeron Island Area would be
identified as a major hot spot and the other six would be considered other hot spots.
Three hot spots were identified in the River Rouge/Ecorse Shoreline characterization, of which
two hot spots were labeled as major and one hot spot was labeled as other (EA 2014b). If the
criteria defined in Section 6.5 were applied to the hot spots identified in the River Rouge/Ecorse
Shoreline characterization, all three of the hot spots would be designated as Level 1. If the
criteria from the Celeron Island Area characterization were applied to the three hot spots
identified in the River Rouge/Ecorse Shoreline characterization, all three would be labeled as
high impact hot spots.
Harbortown Upstream Area Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
Page 7-1
June 2019
7. CONCLUSIONS
Based on the data collected during the Harbortown Upstream Area sediment characterization,
there are no Level 1 high impact hot spots. The Level 2 hot spot areas with elevated
concentrations of constituents are: Harbortown Upstream Hot Spots 1, 3, and 4. These Level 2
hot spots have an estimated total of approximately 466,194 cubic yard (cy) of sediment with
constituent concentrations meeting the Level 2 criteria.
The Level 3 hot spot areas with elevated concentrations of constituents are: Harbortown
Upstream Hot Spots 2 and 5. These Level 3 hot spots have an estimated total of approximately
368,345 cubic yard (cy) of sediment with constituent concentrations meeting the Level 3 criteria.
The five hot spots identified in the Harbortown Upstream Area were determined to be Level 2 or
3 hot spots and should be considered for further investigation. Model results indicated that three
of these five areas have (Level 2) a large volume of sediment with elevated concentrations of
constituents exceeding three times respective PECs and elevated PAH ESBTUs and PEC-Qs.
There is a possible correlation of elevated concentrations being associated with soft sediment;
cores that were comprised primarily of fat, gray clay had fewer to no exceedances. Further
delineation of the extent of sediment with elevated concentrations of constituents is
recommended.
The modeling results for all constituents exceeding two or three times the PEC, the PAH
ESBTUs, and the PEC-Qs suggest that the hot spot areas should be considered for further
investigation and potential remediation within the Harbortown Upstream Area. However, it
should be noted that the limited number of samples results in significant uncertainty of the
volume of sediment with elevated concentrations of constituents in the hot spot areas.
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 7-2
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
This page intentionally left blank
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 8-1
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
8. REFERENCES
AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Anchor QEA, LLC, and ENVIRON International
Corporation. 2013. Lower Rouge River - Old Channel: Final FS Report. Prepared for
Honeywell International Inc. August.
Battelle. 2007. Sediment Toxicity of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fractions. Prepared for
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection - Office of Research and Standards.
September.
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC and Its Affiliate EA Science and
Technology (E A). 2014a. Assessment of Contaminated Sediments, Celeron Island Area Site
Characterization Report, Detroit River Area of Concern, Grosse He, Michigan. July.
. 2014b. Assessment of Contaminated Sediments, River Rouge/Ecorse Shoreline Site
Characterization Report, Detroit River Area of Concern, Wayne County, Michigan. August.
. 2015. Assessment of Contaminated Sediments, Mid/Lower Trenton Channel Area Site
Characterization Report, Detroit River Area of Concern, Grosse He, Michigan. July.
. 2016a. Assessment of Contaminated Sediment, Riverbend Area Site Characterization,
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan. June.
. 2016b. Assessment of Contaminated Sediment, Harbortown Area Site
Characterization, Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan. December.
. 2018. Quality Assurance Project Plan, Assessment of Contaminated Sediment,
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization, Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit,
Michigan. October.
. 2019. Data Usability Assessment Report, Harbortown Upstream Area Site
Characterization, Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan. April.
Geiger, S.C. 2010. The Determination of Sediment Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH)
Bioavailability using Direct Pore Water Analysis by Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME).
ESTCP Project ER-200709. Prepared for Environmental Security Technology Certification
Program, U.S. Department of Defense. August.
Ingersoll, C.G., D.D. MacDonald, N. Wang, J.L. Crane, L.J. Field, P.S. Haverland, N.E. Kemble,
R.A. Lindskoog, C. Severn, and D.E. Smorong. 2001. Predictions of sediment toxicity using
consensus-based freshwater sediment quality guidelines. Archives of Environmental
Contamination and Toxicology 41:8-21.
Kenaga, D. and J. Crum. 1987. Sediment PCB Concentrations along the U.S. shoreline of the
upper Detroit River, and sediment and Water PCB concentrations in two City of Detroit
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
Page 8-2
June 2019
combined sewers with overflows to the Detroit River, July and October 1986 and January
1987. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Surface Water Quality Division
MacDonald D.D., C.G. Ingersoll, and T.A. Berger. 2000. Development and evaluation of
consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Archives of
Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 39:20-31.
MacDonald, D.D. and M. MacFarlane. 1999. (Draft). Criteria for managing contaminated
sediment in British Columbia. British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Lands, and Parks.
Victoria, British Columbia.
Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE). 1996. Detroit River
Remedial Action Plan Report.
. 2008. The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Biennial Remedial Action
Plan Update for the Detroit River Area of Concern. 2 January.
Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR). 1991. Detroit River Remedial Action
Plan Stage 1. Surface Water Quality Division, Lansing, Michigan. June.
Persaud, D.R., R. Jaagumagi, and A. Hayton. 1993. Guidelines for the protection and
management of aquatic sediments in Ontario. Standards Development Branch. Ontario
Ministry of Environment and Energy. Toronto, Canada.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2000. Prediction of sediment Toxicity Using
Consensus-Based Freshwater Sediment Quality Guidelines. EPA 905/R-00/007. Great
Lakes Program Office, Chicago, Illinois.
. 2003 a. Procedures for the Derivation of Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment
Benchmarks (ESBs) for the Protection ofBenthic Organisms: PAH Mixtures. EPA-600-R-
02-013. Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C. 20460.
. 2003b. EPA Region 5 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Ecological Screening
Levels. August.
. 2005. Procedures for the Derivation of Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmarks
(ESBs) for the Protection ofBenthic Organisms: Metal Mixtures (Cadmium, Copper, Lead,
Nickel, Silver, and Zinc). EPA-600-R-02-011. Office of Research and Development,
Washington, D.C. 20460. January.
. 2008. Interim Guidance for Developing Global Positioning System Data Collection
Standard Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance Project Plans. EPA/600/R-08/020.
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
Page 8-3
June 2019
. 2009. Guidance for Labeling Externally Evaluated Laboratory Analytical Data for
Superfund Use. OSWERNo. 9200.1-85. EPA 540-R-08-005. Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Washington, D.C. 13 January.
. 2014a. National Functional Guidelines for Superfund Organic Method Data Review.
EPA-540-R-014-002. Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation.
August.
. 2014b. National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Superfund Data Review.
EPA-540-R-013-001. Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation.
August.
. 2015. Statement of Work Assessment of Contaminated Sediments for the Riverbend
Area Site Characterization in the Detroit River Area of Concern. June.
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR). 2003. Consensus Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for Use and Application. WT 732-2003. December.
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.36
Revision: 00
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 8-4
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2019
This page intentionally left blank
Harbortown Upstream Area
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Final Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
Figures
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
VICINITY MAP
'V f- r y 4 V/'' v. smiv
a^«aSPTm\
.M , * - :
, ? * *
¦ ,
"/ •¦:, V'.V-, ' 'N -•> J
i%,f
tmxlM
J
Ezfifflffls?
i iil—
«/;• .•
MttoGUGfefa
! Ml , ,,. ;—'
i/TT^yv^
¦"iyf1 i
/>y 'r^ s
Wl
/¦usfe
Ml
- MICH|GAW
'" JMHxaukec \ ^0rm| Rapllll
7 0
Lansing D
'Chicago'
Cm
©Borne
Toronto
tsamia .London
-Project Site
NY
ft.
1 fi-m;i
PA .,
IN
INDIANA
fnd oriapoll-.
OH d --•
j 0
>bui>
I
Cincinnati
J
wv -
MD
_l
Legend
Harbortown - Upstream Project Area
Harbortown Project Area (EA 2016)
Riverbend Project Area (EA2016)
Detroit River Area of Concern
- f ft
rifr "V
M&fJK
• .¦ n
gp
\
~ &
/!
Kg
1
M -
- kmfc
*A
-dp
«*
r J
y in
r "E -D Ji
111
* l!
^*p - ».<
KW* r;r" ' -, - » 4
*Jf ipj
J S m
#K *vi;£!!
c >-&¦ " ..-Til'
IvJnC^i
• ill J JR» | JI, ,7 id
m g jif jtJ w ti
*PlLMW My». T -
mr
Vw:
j ¦'lis : ¦_ ^ ¦¦*¦•*¦ IDEkJP *ipm ¦»
fc-ttf-^lJayv»Sygg stmpa ™-j'..
ll- *
Map Date: 5/6/2019
Source: ESRI 2017, Google Earth 2017
Projection: NAD 1983 State Plane Michigan South US Feet
©
HI
HI
HV;
' AV l
> -r *
*¦- n
¦ vi*k
ir.r
II «¦ id
uvfcTT^ _i
0 1 2 3 4
Miles
_'A" * '«
' isaWf'
i ;/ ' ¦ ¦
• ~
-------
-3> k\
r> *r T~
£ Sr-
t* V. ;
?® ' vT *IC tf -
((u'i 4 " • A, ?-
»&*>• n ' i ?v -
jU^S'U'^'.T '-•¦
1» . .j,
I * jiH *• *
l. i jjiw-i.fi
7,*1- jf .* fe* fffcft;'
J V Hft t.' -,.
, 1W
Tkr4
VICINITY MAP
Farminglpn
Hill
Nov i SoUthftdd
Sterling
Heights
©
Lake St
Ctotr j
Livonia Map Extent
West land Detroit
0 ejfborn .nH^or
Canton Heights
S Tecumseh
Taylor i
a Salle
Amheistbug
Esse*
Harrow Kings
Legend
O
Surface Sample Collected Only;
Penetration Less than 1 ft
Core Collected Only;
Adequate Surface Volume
Could Not Be Collected
Ponar Surface Sample and
Core Sample Location
No Sample Collected;
® Location Abandoned
Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs)
A Controlled CSO
A Uncontrolled CSO
A Historical
Industrial Outfalls
~ Status Unknown
Harbortown - Upstream Project Area
I I Detroit River Area of Concern
Map Date: 6/3/2019
Source: Google Earth 2017
Projection: NAD 1983 State Plane Michigan South US Feet
IffOO 2,000
Feet
Figure 1-2
Harbortown - Upstream Area
Harbortown - Upstream Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
WA
i. j. --
Detroit Waterworks Park II WTP
Storm sewer
p Hp*
Conner Creek CSO
I— Fairview pump station (P28-P31) (CSO outfall 004)
Fischer (B04) (outfall 007)|
j Iroquois (BOS) (outfall 006) I
McClellan (B03) (outfall 005)
I 1
1 ,
'vl
V • «¦
|—| DTE W72]
1 1
*•# -pc -i. t *7- -SLj.
11 r". ' j* - -i "« \ i
n r
lf|
l3
IVWVTP outfall
3 <•
fflw
SMV A5 '
!¦ I* ¦ It
i>4i - • ->1» x# te- •
i'4f>
h'.'V '• i '
r&2'-* ; ' '
ill "v,
"•v
Belle Isle
Detroit River
VICINITY MAP
Sterling
Heights
Farming! on
Hill
Novi
wMm
S. lUthlldd ^
Livonia Map Extent—\
\^\
V ,1,1,1 Detroit
Dearborn ,ndsor Tecumseh
Carton Heights .nasor ^
!< W^|T«toi /SaleJ-
Esse* -
i Amtietslbug
Harrow Kiri'.i
Legend
Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs)
A Controlled CSO
A Uncontrolled CSO
A Historical
Industrial Outfalls
~ Status Unknown
I 1 Detroit River Area of Concern
Map Date: 6/3/2019
Source: Google Earth 2017
Projection: NAD 1983 State Plane Michigan South US Feet
©
0 rooo 2,000
Feet
Figure 1-3
Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs)
and Industrial Outfalls in the
Harbortown - Upstream Area
Harbortown - Upstream Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
HT18-20
HT18-21
HT18-14
HT18-26
HT18-13
HT18-27
HT18-03
HT18-15
HT18-25
HT18-16
HT18-24
HT18-12
HT18-28
HT18-17
HT18-23
HT 18-11
HT18-29
HT18-18
HT18-22
HT18-30
HT18-10
HT18-19
HT18-31
HT18-09
HT18-32
HT18-08
HT18-02
HT18-01
HT18-07
HT18-04
HT18-06
HT18-05
Detroit River
r'?|> X' '
* • »¦¦¦ vS,
¦ I
Legend
# Core Sample Location
A Ponar Surface Sample
X Location Abandoned
Detroit River Area of Concern
Map Date: 6/3/2019
Source: Google Earth 2017
Projection: NAD 1983 State Plane Michigan South US Feet
U)00 2,000
Feet
Figure 2-1
Sample Locations in the
Harbortown - Upstream Area
Harbortown - Upstream Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
VICINITY MAP
o
CD
h- CM
CD
LO
CO
T—
t- o
CD
00
LO
CO
CM
T_
o
CD
00
h-
CD
LO CO
CM
T—
CO
CM
CM CO
CM
CM
CM CM
CM
CO CM
¦«—
¦*—
¦*—
¦*—
¦«—
O
o
o
O
o o
o
O
o
CO
CO
CO CO
oo
00
00 00
CO
00 00
00
oo
00
oo
00
00
00
00
oo
OO
oo
00
OO
00 00
00
00
CO
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
I—
I-
I- I—
I—
I—
I— I—
I—
I-1-
I—
I—
I—
I—
H
I—
I—
I—
H
I—
I—
\—
I—
I— I—
\—
I—
H
X
X
X X
X
X
XX
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
C
o
'¦4—'
<0
>
Q)
LU
570
560
550
O
o
§
O
o
o
¥
u
:
Legend
A Ponar Surface Sample
# Core Sample Location
~ Detroit River Area of Concern
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon Total PCB Aroclor (ND = 0) results.
Total PCB Aroclor Cone. (ND = 0)
>3x PEC (2,028 (jg/kg)
>2x PEC (1,352 Mg/kg) and <3x PEC (2,028 Mg/kg)
>PEC (676 Mg/kg) and <2x PEC (1,352 ug/kg)
>TEC (59.8 |jg/kg) and
-------
VICINITY MAP
o
CD
h- CM
CD
LO
CO
T—
t- o
CD
00
LO
CO
CM
T_
o
CD
00
h-
CD
LO CO
CM
T—
CO
CM
CM CO
CM
CM
CM CM
CM
CO CM
¦«—
¦*—
¦*—
¦*—
¦«—
O
o
o
O
o o
o
O
o
CO
CO
CO CO
oo
00
00 00
CO
00 00
00
oo
00
oo
00
00
00
00
oo
OO
oo
00
OO
00 00
00
00
CO
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
I—
I-
I- I—
I—
I—
I— I—
I—
I-1-
I—
I—
I—
I—
H
I—
I—
I—
H
I—
I—
\—
I—
I— I—
\—
I—
H
X
X
X X
X
X
XX
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
C
o
to
>
a>
LU
570
560
550
540
O
TT1
O
t
v
A
¦«-
• o
g c
¥
ii
0
o
ir
Legerid
A Ponar Surface Sample
# Core Sample Location
~ Detroit River Area of Concern
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon Total 17 PAH (ND = 1/2 RL) results.
Total 17 PAHs (ND = % RL)
Concentrations
>3x PEC (68,400 pg/kg) and <10x PEC (228,000 (jg/kg)
>2x PEC (45,600 (jg/kg) and <3x PEC (68,400 Mg/kg)
>PEC (22,800 |jg/kg) and <2x PEC (45,600 jjg/kg)
>TEC (1,610 (jg/kg) and SPEC (22,800 pg.kg)
-------
VICINITY MAP
o
CD
h- CM
CD
LO
CO
T—
t- o
CD
00
LO
CO
CM
T_
o
CD
00
h-
CD
LO CO
CM
T—
CO
CM
CM CO
CM
CM
CM CM
CM
CO CM
¦«—
¦*—
¦*—
¦*—
¦«—
¦«—
O
o
o
O
o o
o
O
o
CO
CO
CO CO
oo
00
00 00
CO
00 00
00
oo
00
oo
00
00
00
00
oo
OO
oo
00
OO
00 00
00
00
CO
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
I—
I-
I- I—
I—
I—
I— I—
I—
I-1-
I—
I—
I—
I—
H
I—
I—
I—
H
I—
I—
\—
I—
I— I—
\—
I—
H
X
X
X X
X
X
XX
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
C
o
'¦4—'
<0
>
Q)
LU
570
560
550
8
8
8
I*
3
O *
tt-
I
-£
a
f
Legend
A Ponar Surface Sample
# Core Sample Location
~ Detroit River Area of Concern
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon arsenic results.
Arsenic Concentrations
>3x PEC (99 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (66 mg/kg) and £3x PEC (99 mg/kg)
>PEC (33 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (66 mg/kg)
>TEC (9.79 mg/kg) and
-------
VICINITY MAP
03
>
0)
LU
o
CD
r- cm
CD
LO
CO
T—
T- o
CD
CO
if)
CO
CNJ
o
CD
CO
CD
LD CO
CNJ
T—
CO
CNJ
CNJ CO
CNJ
CNJ
CM CNJ
CNJ
CO CNJ
¦«—
T—
¦*—
¦*—
¦«—
¦*—
¦*—
O
o
o
O
O O
o
o
CO
CO
CO CO
CO
CO
coco
CO
CO CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO CO
CO
CO
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
—
T— T—
t—
T— T—
T—
T—
t—
T—
T—
T—
T—
—
T—
t—
T—
T—
—
T— T—
—
T—
H
h-
I- h-
H
h-
hi-
1-
hh
h-
h-
h-
h-
H
H
H
h-
h-
I-
h-
h-
I-
1- h-
h-
H
X
X
X X
X
X
ll
X
XX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
570
560
550
540
©
Point* farms
•
0 •
•
o
o
•
A
•
A
c
w
•
•
2 •
¦ •
•
o
o
w
o
o
0
o
•
A
' 2
•
•
!•*
•
8
•
8
•
o o
* m
•
o
0
ft
o
• •
t
*
I
8° • *
•
r\
•
9 •
8
w
8
•
o
¦w
•
Tecurm«li P*=-"
Legend
A Ponar Surface Sample
© Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon cadmium results.
Cadmium Concentrations
>3x PEC (14.94 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (9.96 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (14.94 mg/kg)
>PEC (4.98 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (9.96 mg/kg)
>TEC (0.99 mg/kg) and
-------
VICINITY MAP
570
560
550
o
CD
h- CM
CD
LO
CO
T—
t- o
CD
00
LO
CO
CM
T_
o
CD
00
h-
CD
LO CO
CM
T—
CO
CM
CM CO
CM
CM
CM CM
CM
CO CM
¦«—
¦*—
¦*—
¦*—
¦«—
O
o
o
O
o o
o
O
o
CO
CO
CO CO
oo
00
00 00
CO
00 00
00
oo
00
oo
00
00
00
00
oo
OO
oo
00
OO
00 00
00
00
CO
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
I—
I-
I- I—
I—
I—
I— I—
I—
I-1-
I—
I—
I—
I—
H
I—
I—
I—
H
I—
I—
\—
I—
I— I—
\—
I—
I—
X
X
X X
X
X
XX
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
O
o
o
-©-
w
I
r
0
1
I
n
Legend
Grotise
Pomle Park
A Ponar Surface Sample
HT18-20
HT18-21
HT18-14
HT18-26
HT18-13
HT18-27
HT18-03
HT18-15
HT18-25
HT18-16
HT18-24
HT18-12
HT18-17
HT18-23
HT18-11
HT18-29
HT18-18
HT18-30
HT18-10
HT18-19
HT18-31
HT18-09
HT18-32
HT18-08
HT18-02
HT18-01
HT18-07
HT18-04
HT18-06
HT18-05
Detroit River
# Core Sample Location
~ Detroit River Area of Concern
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon chromium results.
Chromium Concentrations
>3x PEC (333 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (222 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (333 mg/kg)
>PEC (111 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (222 mg/kg)
>TEC (43.4 mg/kg) and
-------
VICINITY MAP
o
CD
h- CM
CD
LO
CO
T—
t- o
CD
00
LO
CO
CM
T_
o
CD
00
h-
CD
LO CO
CM
T—
CO
CM
CM CO
CM
CM
CM CM
CM
CO CM
¦*—
¦*—
¦*—
¦*—
¦*—
O
o
o
O
o o
o
O
o
CO
CO
CO CO
oo
00
00 00
CO
00 00
00
oo
00
oo
00
00
00
00
oo
OO
oo
00
OO
00 00
00
00
CO
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
I—
I-
I- I—
I—
I—
I— I—
I—
I-1-
I—
I—
I—
I—
H
I—
I—
I—
H
I—
I—
\—
I—
I— I—
\—
I—
H
X
X
X X
X
X
XX
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
C
o
to
>
a>
LU
570
560
550
540
• 2 °
: i
O e * 0 o • 2
O GOO
O 9 9 -
: »i
2 a o s* * X
Q • ° f o •
° * I
Q © ©
b
•
o • • o 51 o o *
3x PEC (447 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (298 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (447 mg/kg)
>PEC (149 mg/kg) arid <2x PEC (298 mg/kg)
>TEC (31.6 mg/kg) and
-------
VICINITY MAP
o
CD
h- CM
CD
LO
CO
T—
t- o
CD
00
LO
CO
CM
T_
o
CD
00
h-
CD
LO CO
CM
T—
CO
CM
CM CO
CM
CM
CM CM
CM
CO CM
¦«—
¦*—
¦*—
¦*—
¦«—
O
o
o
O
o o
o
O
o
CO
CO
CO CO
oo
00
00 00
CO
00 00
00
oo
00
oo
00
00
00
00
00
00
oo
00
OO
00 00
00
00
CO
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
I—
I-
I- I—
I—
I—
HI—
I—
I-1-
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
H
I—
\—
I—
I— I—
\—
I—
H
X
X
X X
X
X
XX
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
C
o
'¦4—'
<0
>
Q)
LU
570
560
550
540
8 S
o
8
S
—Q
•
i
*
s
w
•
*
Legend
A Ponar Surface Sample
# Core Sample Location
~ Detroit River Area of Concern
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon iron results.
Iron Concentrations
>3x PEC (120,000 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (80,000 mg/kg)
and <3x PEC (120,000 mg/kg)
>PEC (40,000 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (80,000 mg/kg)
>TEC (20,000 mg/kg) and SPEC (40,000 mg/kg)
-------
VICINITY MAP
570
560
550
o
CD
h- CM
CD
LO
CO
T—
t- o
CD
00
LO
CO
CM
T_
o
CD
00
h-
CD
LO CO
CM
T—
CO
CM
CM CO
CM
CM
CM CM
CM
CO CM
¦«—
¦*—
¦*—
¦*—
¦«—
¦«—
O
o
o
O
o o
o
O
o
CO
CO
CO CO
oo
00
00 00
CO
00 00
00
oo
00
oo
00
00
00
00
oo
OO
oo
00
OO
00 00
00
00
CO
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
I—
I—
I- I—
I—
I—
I— I—
I—
I-1-
I—
I—
I—
I—
H
I—
I—
I—
H
I—
I—
\—
I—
I— I—
\—
I—
I—
X
X
X X
X
X
XX
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
O
o
o
-tr-
w
O
5 I
I
V"
XT
o
o
©—8
9
A
G 0 ¦
_• m o
O
o
o «b
rr
i
o
Legend
Gross*'
Poiivle Park
A Ponar Surface Sample
HT18-20
HT18-21
HT18-14
HT18-26
HT18-13
HT18-27
Hf 18-03
HT18-15
HT18-25
HT18-16
HT18-24
HT18-12
HT18-17
HT18-23
HT18-11
HT18-29
HT18-18
HT18-30
HT18-10
HT18-19
HT18-31
HT18-09
HT18-32
HT18-08
HT18-02
HT18-01
HT18-07
HT18-04
HT18-06
HT18-05
Detroit River
# Core Sample Location
~ Detroit River Area of Concern
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon lead results.
Lead Concentrations
>3x PEC (384 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (256 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (384 mg/kg)
>PEC (128 mg/kg) arid <2x PEC (256 mg/kg)
>TEC (35.8 mg/kg) and
-------
VICINITY MAP
C
o
'-t—'
03
>
0)
LU
o
CD
h- OJ
LD
T—
T- o
CD
CO
LO
CO
CM
o
CD
CO
CD
LD CO
OJ
T—
CO
OJ
C\J CO
CM
Csi
OJ
CO CM
¦*—
¦*—
t—
T—
O
o
o
o
o o
o
o
CO
CO
CO CO
CO
CO
CO
CO CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO CO
CO
CO
T—
T—
T— T—
—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
t—
T—
T—
T—
T—
—
T—
t—
T—
T—
—
T— T—
—
T—
I-
I-
I- I-
I-
I-
l-l-
I-
I-
I-
I-
1-
1-
1-
1-
1-
1-
1-
1-
1-
1- 1-
1-
1-
X
X
X X
X
X
X
XX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
570
560
550
—e
•
•
8' :*
•
Te
§
i
$
o
\
Map Extent-
\ y\
JC \
W
Tecurm«li P*=-"
Legend
A Ponar Surface Sample
© Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon mercury results.
Mercury Concentrations
>3x PEC (3.18 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (2.12 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (3.18 mg/kg)
>PEC (1.06 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (2.12 mg/kg)
>TEC (0.18 mg/kg) and
-------
VICINITY MAP
o
CD
h- CM
CD
LO
CO
T—
t- o
CD
00
LO
CO
CM
T_
o
CD
00
h-
CD
LO CO
CM
T—
CO
CM
CM CO
CM
CM
CM CM
CM
CO CM
¦*—
¦*—
¦*—
¦«—
¦*—
O
o
o
O
o o
o
O
o
CO
CO
CO CO
oo
00
00 00
CO
00 00
00
oo
00
oo
00
00
00
00
00
00
oo
00
OO
00 00
00
00
CO
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
I—
I-
I- I—
I—
I—
HI—
I—
I-1-
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I-
I—
\—
I—
I— I—
\—
I—
H
X
X
X X
X
X
XX
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
C
o
to
>
a>
LU
570
560
550
540
O
O
o<
o
8
o
o
o
o
o
ft
O
s
o
O 0
1
Legend
A Panar Surface Sample
# Core Sample Location
~ Detroit River Area of Concern
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon nickel results.
Nickel Concentrations
>3x PEC (145.8 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (97.2 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (145.8 mg/kg)
>PEC (48.6 mg/kg) arid <2x PEC (97.2 mg/kg)
>TEC (22.7 mg/kg) and
-------
VICINITY MAP
&
c
o
"-i-*
cc
>
_0)
UJ
o
CD
LO
T—
o
CD
CO
CO
CM
CD
CO
CD
UO CO
T—
CO
CM
CM
CM
CM
¦«—
T—
¦«—
T—
t—
O
o
o
O
o o
o
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO CO
CO
T—
t—
t—
t—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
—
t—
T—
T—
—
T— T—
T—
H
H
H
H
H
I-
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
I- H
I—
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
I
570
560
550
540
O
9
*3
I*-
w
Tecum- <-* i Hc.c
Legend
A Ponar Surface Sample
© Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon silver results.
Silver Concentrations
>3x PEC (6.6 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (4.4 mg/kg) arid <3x PEC (6.6 mg/kg)
>PEC (2.2 mg/kg) arid <2x PEC (4.4 mg/kg)
>TEC (1.6 mg/kg) and
-------
VICINITY MAP
570
560
550
o
CD
h- CM
CD
LO
CO
T—
t- o
CD
00
LO
CO
CM
T_
o
CD
00
h-
CD
LO CO
CM
T—
CO
CM
CM CO
CM
CM
CM CM
CM
CO CM
¦«—
¦*—
¦*—
¦*—
¦«—
O
o
o
O
o o
o
O
o
CO
CO
CO CO
oo
00
00 00
CO
00 00
00
oo
00
oo
00
00
00
00
oo
OO
oo
00
OO
00 00
00
00
CO
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
I—
I—
I- I—
I—
I—
I— I—
I—
I-1-
I—
I—
I—
I—
H
I—
I—
I—
H
I—
I—
\—
I—
I— I—
\—
I—
H
X
X
X X
X
X
XX
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
O
O
~©~
w
o o
8
.
I
O
o
o
o
o
-e-
*
©
l
Legend
Grossf'
Poiivle Park
A Ponar Surface Sample
HT18-20
HT18-21
HT18-14
HT18-26
HT18-13
HT18-27
Hf 18-03
HT18-15
HT18-25
HT18-16
HT18-24
HT18-12
HT18-17
HT18-23
HT18-11
HT18-29
HT18-18
HT18-30
HT18-10
HT18-19
HT18-31
HT18-09
HT18-32
HT18-08
HT18-02
HT18-01
HT18-07
HT18-04
HT18-06
HT18-05
Detroit River
# Core Sample Location
~ Detroit River Area of Concern
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon zinc results.
Zinc Concentrations
>3x PEC (1,377 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (918 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (1,377 mg/kg)
>PEC (459 mg/kg) arid <2x PEC (918 mg/kg)
>TEC (121 mg/kg) and
-------
HT18-20
HT18-21
HT18-14
HT18-26
HT18-13
Hf 18-03
HT18-15
HT18-25
HT18-16
HT18-24
HT18-12
HT18-17
HT18-23
HT18-11
HT18-29
HT18-18
HT18-30
HT18-10
HT18-19
HT18-31
HT18-09
HT18-32
HT18-08
HT18-02
HT18-01
HT18-07
HT18-04
HT18-06
HT18-05
Detroit River
Legend
I PI I Concentrations
A >10,000 mg/kg
~ < 10,000 mg/kg
A s 5,000 mg/kg
A < 1,000 mg/kg
A <100 mg/kg
Detroit River Area of Concern
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
Map Date: 5/6/2019
Source: Google Earth 2017
Projection: NAD 1983 State Plane Michigan South US Feet
©
0 1,000 2,000
Figure 3-13
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
(EDR0+0R0) (mg/kg)
Harbortown - Upstream Area
Harboriown - Upstream Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
HT18-20
HT18-21
HT18-14
HT18-26
HT18-13
Hf 18-03
HT18-15
HT18-25
HT18-16
HT18-24
HT18-12
HT18-17
HT18-23
HT18-11
HT18-29
HT18-18
HT18-30
HT18-10
HT18-19
HT18-31
HT18-09
HT18-32
HT18-08
HT18-02
HT18-01
HT18-07
HT18-04
HT18-06
HT18-05
Detroit River
GID5W
Kcirk
Legend
A Ponar Surface Sample
Detroit River Area of Concern
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Sample results and SSRSLs are displayed
on Table 3-8.
- SSRSL = Site-specific Risk Screening Level
TPH-DRO Concentrations
> 3x SSRSL mg/kg
> 2x SSRSL mg/kg
> 1x SSRSL mg/kg
Does Not Exceed SSRSL
Map Date: 5/6/2019
Source: Google Earth 2017
Projection: NAD 1983 State Plane Michigan South US Feet
©
0 1,000 2^000
Feet
Figure 3-14
Diesel Range Organics (mg/kg)
Harbortown - Upstream Area
Harboriown - Upstream Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
HT18-20
HT18-21
HT18-14
HT18-26
HT18-13
Hf 18-03
HT18-15
HT18-25
HT18-16
HT18-24
HT18-12
HT18-17
HT18-23
HT18-11
HT18-29
HT18-18
HT18-30
HT18-10
HT18-19
HT18-31
HT18-09
HT18-32
HT18-08
HT18-02
HT18-01
HT18-07
HT18-04
HT18-06
HT18-05
Detroit River
GID5W
Kcirk
Legend
A Ponar Surface Sample
Detroit River Area of Concern
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Sample results and SSRSLs are displayed
on Table 3-8.
- SSRSL = Site-specific Risk Screening Level
TPH-ORO Concentrations
> 3x SSRSL mg/kg
> 2x SSRSL mg/kg
> 1x SSRSL mg/kg
Does Not Exceed SSRSL
Map Date: 5/6/2019
Source: Google Earth 2017
Projection: NAD 1983 State Plane Michigan South US Feet
©
0 1,000 2^000
Feet
Figure 3-15
Oil Range Organics (mg/kg)
Harbortown - Upstream Area
Harboriown - Upstream Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
VICINITY MAP
C
o
'¦4—'
<0
>
Q)
LU
570
560
550
o
G)
h- CM
CD
lO
CO
T—
t- o
CD
CO
LO
CO
CM
T_
o
CD
CO
r-
CD
LO CO
CM
T—
CO
CM
CM CO
CM
CN!
CM CM
CM
CO CM
¦*—
¦*—
¦*—
¦*—
¦*—
t—
O
o
o
O
o o
o
O
o
oo
00
CO CO
CO
CO
00 00
CO
CO CO
00
oo
CO
OO
CO
00
CO
CO
oo
CO
CO
CO
OO
CO 00
CO
00
CO
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
•5—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
H
H
1— 1—
H
i—
hi-
H
1— 1—
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H H
H
H-
H
X
X
X X
X
X
ll
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
A
O
a
O
G
•
s
o
o
•
A
i
*
«
•
O
•
•
m
•
CO
Ci
0
©
9
•
o
•
•
•
•
V
•
•
o
Q
•
D
i
•
•
o
•
•
Oo
0
_
•
•
•
b
•
O
9
#
O
•
K*
9
8
2
•
•
o
•
—,
•
' /
_Q_
i
o
o
Legend
A Ponar Surface Sample
# Core Sample Location
~ Detroit River Area of Concern
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon ESBTU results.
- ESBTUs were calculated using total 34 PAHs.
ESBTUs for PAHs
>10
> 7.5 and < 10
> 1 and < 7.5
< 1
Map Date: 5/1/2019
Source: Google Earth 2017
Projection: NAD 1983 State Plane Michigan South US Feet
©
0 1,000 2^000
Feet
Figure 4-1
ESBTUs for PAHs
Harbortown - Upstream Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown - Upstream Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
Grossf'
Poiivle 'Park
HT18-20
HT18-21
HT18-14
HT18-26
HT18-13
HT18-27
Hf 18-03
HT18-15
HT18-25
HT18-16
HT18-24
HT18-12
HT18-17
HT18-23
HT18-11
HT18-29
HT18-18
HT18-30
HT18-10
HT18-19
HT18-31
HT18-09
HT18-32
HT18-08
HT18-02
HT18-01
HT18-07
HT18-04
HT18-06
HT18-05
Detroit River
-------
VICINITY MAP
570
o
O)
h- CM
CD
LO
CO
T—
t- o
CD
CO
LO
CO
CM
CM CO
CM
CM
CM CM
CM
CO CM
¦*—
¦*—
¦*—
CO
CO
CO CO
CO
CO
CO CO
CO
CO CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
H
1-
1- H
H
H
HI—
H
1-1-
H
H
H
H
H
X
X
X X
X
X
XX
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
CO
CO
CM
CO
CO
i—
X
o
co
CD
o
CO
H
X
CO h-
o o
co co
H H
X X
CD
o
co
1—
X
LO CO
o o
co co
H H
X X
o
co
CM
O
CO
H
X
o
CO
A
w
O «
I
0
I
•
+
A
g 560
C
o
&
Q
W
«
•
o 8
•
s :
W
•
¦
o*
i
s •
•J
Q
o*
•
i
•
%
Q #
*
•
0
•o
o
•
A
•
• •
s
-t—'
03
>
CD
m 550
Q
$
8*
: * «
W
o
fx
-J
I
: —
G
Legend
Grossf'
Poiivle Park
A Ponar Surface Sample
HT18-20
HT18-21
HT18-14
HT18-26
HT18-13
HT18-27
HT18-03
HT18-15
HT18-25
HT18-16
HT18-24
HT18-12
HT18-17
HT18-23
HT18-11
HT18-29
HT18-18
HT18-30
HT18-10
HT18-19
HT18-31
HT18-09
HT18-32
HT18-08
HT18-02
HT18-01
HT18-07
HT18-04
HT18-06
HT18-05
Detroit River
# Core Sample Location
~ Detroit River Area of Concern
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon PEC-Q results.
Mean PEC-Q Value
(mean PEC-Q metals +
PEC-Q Total PAHs +
PEC-Q Total PCBs)/3
> 5
> 1 and < 5
> 0.5 arid < 1
< 0.5
Map Date: 5/1/2019
Source: Google Earth 2017
Projection: NAD 1983 State Plane Michigan South US Feet
©
0 1,000 2£00
Feet
Figure 51
PEC-Qs
Harbortown - Upstream Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown - Upstream Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
HT18-23
HT18-24
HT18-25
Hotspot 4
22,976 cu yds
Total 17 PAHs
Hotspot 3
30,699 cu yds
Total 17 PAHs
HT18-14
HT18-13
HT18-26
HT18-12
HT18-27
HT18-21
HT18-03
HT18-20
HT18-15
Hotspot 1
412,519 cu yds
Total PCBs
HT18-16
Hotspot 2
166,389 cu yds
Cadmium
HT18-11
HT18-17
HT18-31
HT18-29
HT18-10
HT18-18
HT18-32
HT18-19
HT18-09
Hotspot 5
201,956 cu yds
Cadmium
HT18-02
HT18-01
HT18-08
HT18-07
HT18-06
HT18-30
HT18-04
HT18-05
Detroit River
rV£2*
Legend
0 Core Sample Location
& Ponar Surface Sample
¦ >3XPEC
1 I >2XPEC
i [ 2 PEC
i I Hot Spot Boundary All PEC Constituents
Map Date: 6/4/2019
Source: Google Earth 2017
Projection: NAD 1983 State Plane Michigan South US Feet
©
0 1,000 2^00
Feet
Figure 6-1
Spatial Analysis for All Constituents
Harbortown - Upstream Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown - Upstream Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
HT18-21
Arialvte
Lead:
Result
HT18-23
Hotspot 3
HT18-26
Hotspot 4
HT18-15
Hotspot 2
HT18-17
HT18-31
HT18-29
Hotspot 1
HT18-01
Detroit River
[HU8-24
¦ Analvte
Result 1
| Mercury:
1.4 |
IHT18-25
| Analvte
Result I
iTotal 17 PAHs:
117500 1
(Cadmium:
10.3 1]
ICopper:
217 1
iLead:
524 ¦
[Mercury:
3.4 !
Isilver:
3 j
Zinc:
837 |
HT18-27
Analvte
Result [
Total 17 PAHs:
30426 1
Nickel:
48.8 j
HT18-20
Analvte
Result
Lead:
157
IHT18-16
1 Analvte
Result I
|Lead:
288 |
IHT1S-14
1 Analvte
Result 1
(Total 17 PAHs: 38970
HT18-13
Analvte
Result
Cadmium:
16.8
Lead:
191
Zinc:
465
HT18-12
Analvte
Cadmium:
Copper:
Lead:
Nickel:
Result
1HT18-03
1 Analvte
Result i
ITotal PCBs:
2900 i
Cadmium:
25.1
Copper:
196 E
Lead:
502
Mercury:
1.5
Nickel:
101
Silver:
4.8
Zinc:
1010
HT18-18
Anaiyte
Total 17 PAHs:
Cadmium:
Copper:
Lead:
Mercury:
Silver:
Zinc:
I HT18-11 I
HT18-10 [
Result
HT18-08
Arialvte
Total 17 PAHs:
Arsenic:
Lead:
Mercury:
86820
Hotspot 5
HT18-32
Analvte
Mercu ry
Resu t
HT18-30
Analvte
Result
Cadmium:
Chromium:
Lead:
Mercury:
Nickei:
Zinc:
HT18-19
Analvte
Total 17 PAHs:
Cadmium:
Copper:
Lead:
Mercury:
, Cv V:.
Result
105330
"J
; ... '
Anaiyte
PECx2
PECx3
1/2 RL
Tota 17 PAHs ND
22800
45600
68400
Tota PCBs ND=0
2028
mg/kg
Arsenic
mg/kg
Cadmium
mg/kg
Chromium
mg/kg
Copper
mg/kg
40000
80000
120000
mg/kg
Me rcu ry
mg/kg
mg/kg
Nickel
mg/kg
Silver
I
mg/kg
1377
1 HUB-09
1 Analvte
Result 1
ICadmium:
5 I
| N icke1:
53.5
Result
86080
34.1
175
1.3
HT18-07
Analvte
Result
Total PCBs:
1600
Cadmium:
16.2
Chromium:
134
Lead:
248
Nickel:
55.2
Silver:
3.3
Zinc:
659
HT18-02I
HT18-Q4
1HT18-05
Analvte
Result 1
Total PCBs:
1770
Cadmium:
8.3
Copper:
162
Lead:
461
Mercury:
1.2
Nickel:
61.5
|zinc:
715 1
[HT18-Q6
Analvte
Result
ITotal PCBs:
6000
ICadmium:
12
Ichromium:
117
ILead:
317
1 Nickel:
78.9
Isilver:
2.9
|zinc:
584
Legend
0 Core Sample Location
& Ponar Surface Sample
¦ >3XPEC
1 I >2XPEC
I I 2 PEC
t"l Hot Spot Boundary All PEC Constituents
Map Date: 6/4/2019
Source: Google Earth 2017
Projection: NAD 1983 State Plane Michigan South US Feet
©
0 1,000 2^00
Feet
Figure 6-2
Spatial Analysis for All Constituents
Harbortown - Upstream Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown - Upstream Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
HT18-23
Ratio (0.5-1 ft): 0.15
HT18-24
Ratio (0.5 -1 ft): 0.98
HT18-21
Ratio (0.5 - 1.7 ft): 0.43
HT18-25
Ratio (3 - 4.2 ft): 3.95
HT18-14
Ratio (0.5 - 1.3 ft): 4.16
HT18-20
Ratio (0.5-0.8 ft): 1.75
HT18-26
Ratio (0.5 -1 ft): 2.61
HT18-13
Ratio (3 - 5 ft): 1.28
Hotspot 3
HT18-27
Ratio (0-0.8 ft): 4.05
_ HT18-12
Ratio (3 - 5 ft): 1.96
HT18-03
Ratio (1 -3 ft): 1.17
HT18-29
Ratio (0.5 -1.2 ft): 2.02
Hotspot 2
HT 18-11
Ratio (3 - 5 ft): 0.20
H T18-.15
Ratio (0 - 0.5 ft): 0.95
Hotspot 1
HT18-10
Ratio (0 - 0.5 ft): 1.83
HT18-16
Ratio (0 - 0.5 ft): 0.09
HT18-01
Ratio (3 - 5 ft): 1.23
Hotspot 5
HT18-17
Ratio (0.5-1 ft): 0.14
HT18-09
Ratio (7 - 9.7 ft): 0.98
HT18-30
Ratio (7 - 9.2 ft): 1.89
HT18-18
Ratio (0.5 - 1.9 ft): 4.07
HT18-08
Ratio (2.3 - 4.6 ft): 3.83
HT18-19
Ratio (1 -2.3 ft): 10.08
HT18-07
Ratio (7 - 8.9 ft): 1.32
HT18-06
Ratio (7.1 -8.1 ft): 3.50
'iver
mm
HT18-32
Ratio (0.5-1 ft): 0.11
HT18-31
Ratio (0.5 -1.3 ft): 0.03
Hotspot 4
HT18-05
Ratio (2,7-5.1 ft): 1.55
HT18-04
Ratio (0.5 - 0.6 ft): 0.07
HT18-02
Ratio (3-6.1 ft): 2.75
Legend
Core Sample Location
Ponar Surface Sample
ESBTU> 10
7.5 < ESBTU < 10
1 < ESBTU < 7.5
Hot Spot Boundary All PEC Constituents
Note:
Ratio value shown represents highest
ESBTU PAH result with associated depth (ft).
ESBTUs were calculated using total 34 PAHs.
Metals ESBTUs are not shown and
were not included as inputs for the spatial analysis.
No values were greater than 130 pmol/g0C.
Q
A.
~
~
~
Map Date: 6/4/2019
Source: Google Earth 2017
Projection: NAD 1983 State Plane Michigan South US Feet
©
0 1,000 2^00
Feet
Figure 6-3
Spatial Analysis for Total PAH ESBTUs
Harbortown - Upstream Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown - Upstream Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
HT18-23
Ratio (0-0.5 ft): 0.16
HT18-24
Ratio (0 - 0.5 ft): 0.27
HT18-21
Ratio (0.5- 1.7 ft): 0.15
HT18-25
Ratio (3 - 4.2 ft): 2.01
HT18-14
Ratio (0.5- 1.3 ft): 0.73
HT18-20
Ratio (0.5 - 0.8 ft): 0.32
HT18-26
Ratio (0.5 -1 ft): 0.21
HT18-13
Ratio (1 - 3 ft): 0.48
Hotspot 3
HT18-27
Ratio (0-0.8 ft): 0.56
_ HT18-12
Ratio (1 -3 ft): 0.68
HT18-03
Ratio (1 - 3 ft): 2.24
HT18-29
Ratio (0.5 -1.2 ft): 0.24
HT 18-11
Ratio (1 - 3 ft): 0.17
H T18-.15
Ratio (3 - 5 ft): 0.07
Hotspot 1
HT18-10
Ratio (0 - 0.5 ft): 0,07
_ HT18-16
Ratio (0-0.5 ft): 0.201
HT18-17
Ratio (1 - 3 ft): 0.07
HT18-01
Ratio (1 -3 ft): 0.18
Hotspot 5
HT18-09
Ratio (7 - 9.7 ft): 0.55
HT18-30
Ratio (7 - 9.2 ft): 0.57
HT18-08
Ratio (2.3-4.6 ft): 1.48
HT18-18
Ratio (0.5- 1.9 ft): 1.91
HT18-19
Ratio (0.5 - 1 ft): 2.09
HT18-07
Ratio (1.8 - 4.8 ft): 1.28
HT18-06
Ratio (7.1 -8.1 ft): 3.41
'iver
ff I
HT18-32
Ratio (0-0.5 ft): 0.18
HT18-31
Ratio (0-0.5 ft): 0.12
HT18-05
Ratio (2,7-5.1 ft)
HT18-04
Ratio (0 - 0.5 ft): 0.08
HT18-02
Ratio (6.1 -7.8 ft): 0.28
Hotspot 4
Hotspot 2
Legend
Core Sample Location
Ponar Surface Sample
1 < PECQ < 5
0.5 < PECQ < 1
Hot Spot Boundary All PEC Constituents
Note:
Mean PEC-Q Value = (Mean PEC-Q metals +
PEC-Q Total 17 PAHs + PEC-Q Total PCBs)/3
Ratio value shown represents highest result
associated with depth (ft).
Q
A
~
~
Map Date: 6/4/2019
Source: Google Earth 2017
Projection: NAD 1983 State Plane Michigan South US Feet
©
0 1,000 2^00
Feet
Figure 6-4
Spatial Analysis for Mean PEC-Qs
Harbortown - Upstream Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown - Upstream Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
Tables
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No. :6256136
TABLE 2-1 HARBORTOWN UPSTREAM AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION CORE SAMPLE COORDINATES AND FIELD NOTES
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER 2018)
Location ID
Date Sampled
Time Sampled
(local)
Target Coordinates
Actual Coordinates
Distance from
Target
Coordinates3 (ft)
Field Notes
Y
X
Y
X
NAD83 State Plane Michigan South (US Survey Feet)
HT18-01
10/29/18
15:10
315192.23
13508075.13
315207.40
13508163.48
90
Location is southeast of Keelson Road Canal.
Encountered refusal at 8.75 ft.
HT18-02
10/29/18
15:45
315056.37
13507390.26
314981.93
13507218.00
188
Location is at the southeast corner of Maheras
Gentry Park, West of Keelson Road. Shifted east to
avoid structures in the water. Did not encounter
refusal. Full 10 ft push.
HT18-03
10/29/18
17:20
314907.48
13506492.58
316204.46
13504821.37
2,115
Probing initially indicated rocks were close to
outfall so the location was shifted downstream
within Conner Creek per EPA's request.
Encountered refusal at 6.25 ft. Core material is dark
black, has a sewage odor, and appears to be CSO.
HT18-04
10/29/18
11:55
314846.92
13506012.69
314799.27
13506032.74
52
Location is southeast of Bayview Yacht Club and
was shifted roughly 50 ft south per EPA's request.
Encountered refusal at 6.0 ft.
HT18-05
10/29/18
16:35
314770.01
13505209.76
314875.03
13505246.58
111
Location is at the mouth of Conor Creek.
Encountered refusal at 6.5 ft.
HT18-06
10/29/18
11:20
314630.34
13504922.58
314606.83
13504925.14
24
Location was shifted roughly 25 ft southwest and is
southeast of Conner Creek power plant. No refusal
encountered. Full 10ft push.
HT18-07
10/29/18
10:30
314620.04
13504112.03
314602.34
13504116.64
18
Location is south of Edison Boat Club. No refusal
encountered. Full 10 ft push.
HT18-08
10/22/18
17:30
314688.32
13503770.82
314683.26
13503777.78
9
Location is at the mouth of the channel east of Sand
Bar Lane houses and west of Connor Creek power
plant. No refusal encountered. Full 10 ft push.
HT18-09
10/22/18
16:55
314712.27
13503175.69
314691.28
13503206.11
37
Location is at the mouth of the channel west of Sand
Bar Lane houses and east of St. Jean Boat Ramp.
No refusal encountered. Full 10 ft push.
HT18-10
10/22/18
15:55
314729.72
13502692.33
314685.39
13502703.88
46
Location is roughly 40 ft east of St. Jean Boat
launch. Refusal encountered at 2.0 ft.
HT18-11
10/22/18
15:21
314717.41
13502281.36
314797.63
13502055.71
239
Location was shifted northwest due to a Bolbo boat.
Location was taken tied up to a seawall north of
Bolbo boat stern. No refusal was encountered. Full
10 ft push.
HT18-12
10/22/18
14:20
314928.71
13501334.14
314913.81
13501317.15
23
Location is at the western edge of Riverside
Marina. No refusal encountered. Full 10 ft push.
HT18-13
10/29/18
9:50
314834.39
13499954.07
314783.68
13499999.58
68
Location was shifted roughly 50 ft southeast
offshore. Due south of Rooster tail. No refusal
encountered. Full 10 ft push.
HT18-14
10/29/18
9:00
314403.97
13498807.97
314381.03
13498806.20
23
Location is south and west of the water treatment
plant. First attempt had no recovery. Second attempt
had encountered refusal at 3 ft. A sheen and odor
were observed during core recovery.
HT18-15
10/24/18
16:50
314291.31
13498518.14
314141.47
13498434.92
171
Location was shifted west to avoid a submerged
water pipeline. South of Kam marine Jefferson.
Encountered refusal at 6.5 ft.
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 2
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No. :6256136
TABLE 2-1 HARBORTOWN UPSTREAM AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION CORE SAMPLE COORDINATES AND FIELD NOTES
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER 2018)
Location ID
Date Sampled
Time Sampled
(local)
Target Coordinates
Actual Coordinates
Distance from
Target
Coordinates3 (ft)
Field Notes
Y
X
Y
X
NAD83 State Plane Michigan South (US Survey Feet)
HT18-16
-
-
314055.14
13498098.42
-
-
-
No samples collected here. Penetration less than 1
ft with no recovery after three attempts.
HT18-17
10/24/18
15:00
314020.61
13497949.23
313640.54
13498052.60
394
Location was shifted offshore-south of Manoogian
mansion per EPA's request. Encountered refusal at
4.5 ft.
HT18-18
10/24/18
11:45
313873.80
13497665.63
313829.97
13497704.09
58
Location is south of Perry Subdivision, roughly30 ft
west of brick boathouse. Encountered refusal at 6.0
ft. Sheen and odor were observed during core
recovery.
HT18-19
10/24/18
11:15
313799.15
13497425.99
313724.96
13497447.99
77
Location is due south of white boathouse and dock.
Encountered refusal at 3.25 ft. Sheen was observed
during core recovery.
HT18-20
10/24/18
10:15
313714.43
13497216.52
313503.46
13496776.66
488
Location was shifted to the west of the marina
mouth per EPA's request. Encountered refusal at
3.25 ft.
HT18-21
10/24/18
9:30
313410.84
13496306.40
313369.05
13496309.93
42
Location is south of Burns Dr. No recovery
collected on first attempt. The second attempt was
collected on a slope and encountered refusal at 2 ft.
A hydrocarbon odor from the core was observed
HT18-22
-
-
313282.35
13495915.97
-
-
-
No samples collected here. EPA opted to abandon
this location in favor of HT18-31.
HT18-23
10/23/18
17:15
313204.09
13495499.30
313212.97
13495482.52
19
Location is east of 8330 on the river building . The
first attempt had 2ft of recovery and sheen on the
core but was not used. The second attempt had 4 ft
of recovery with a 5 ft tube but was not used. The
Third attempt had no refusal. Full 10ft push.
HT18-24
10/23/18
16:10
313044.75
13495316.72
313026.65
13495347.65
36
Location is offshore of 8330 building. The first
attempt was using a 5 foot tube, and had no refusal.
The second attempt was using a 10 ft tube and
encountered refusal at 9.0 ft.
HT18-25
10/23/18
15:00
312956.68
13495101.34
312941.41
13495136.25
38
Location was along seawall, north/south facing. No
refusal was encountered. A full 10ft. Push
HT18-26
10/23/18
14:40
312666.39
13494711.65
312652.58
13494738.30
30
Location is south of the UAW building. No refusal
was encountered. A full 10ft push. A hydrocarbon
odor and sheen were observed from the core.
HT18-27
10/23/18
9:45
312089.78
13494061.39
312054.29
13494070.31
37
Location is offshore of the River Terrace
Apartments. The first attempt had no recovery. The
second attempt encountered refusal at 3.0ft.
HT18-28
-
-
311631.07
13493556.26
-
-
-
No samples collected here. Probing indicates hard
pack sand. EPA opted to abandon this location in
favor of HT18-32.
HT18-29
10/22/18
11:35
311374.20
13493269.52
311376.81
13493301.66
32
Location is at the east end of Gabriel Richard Park.
Encountered refusal at 1.5 ft.
HT18-30
10/22/18
9:55
311056.45
13492824.80
311119.35
13492902.54
100
Location in found of Gabriel Richard Park, roughly
50 ft east of the MacArthur Bridge. No refusal
encountered. Full 10 ft. push.
HT18-31
10/23/18
11:25
-
-
312523.64
13497037.48
New Location
Location is in the center of the channel between
Belle Isle and US main land side of the Detroit
River. Encountered refusal at 6.75 ft.
HT18-32
10/23/18
10:50
-
-
311044.78
13494702.36
New Location
Location is in the center of the channel between
Belle Isle and US main land side of the Detroit
River. Encountered refusal at 7 ft.
EPA = U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency
NAD83 = North American Datum of 1983
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 2
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.36
TABLE 2-2 HARBORTOWN UPSTREAM AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION SURFACE SAMPLE COORDINATES AND DESCRIPTION
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER 2018)
Location ID
Date Sampled
Time Sampled
(local)
Actual Coordinates
Surface Sample Description
Y
X
NAD83 State Plane Michigan South
(US Survey Feet)
HT18-01
10/29/18
15:10
315207.40
13508163.48
Gray/brown silt with trace organics.
HT18-02
10/29/18
15:45
314981.93
13507218.00
Dark gray silt with fibrous organics and trace sand, light
brown film on top.
HT18-03
10/29/18
17:20
316204.46
13504821.37
black silt, sewage odor.
HT18-04
10/29/18
11:55
314799.27
13506032.74
Gray/brown silt with some sand and trace organics.
HT18-05
10/29/18
16:35
314875.03
13505246.58
Dark brown silt with trace sand and trace organic fibers,
light brown film on top, sewage smell.
HT18-06
10/29/18
11:20
314606.83
13504925.14
Dark Gray silt with trace sand and trace organics, and a
light brown film on top. PID reading is 0.4 ppm.
HT18-07
10/29/18
10:30
314602.34
13504116.64
Dark gray silt with some fine grained sand and trace
organics. Brown film and sheen on top of ponar.
HT18-08
10/22/18
17:30
314683.26
13503777.78
Gray/brown silt with a couple pieces of organic debris.
HT18-09
10/22/18
16:55
314691.28
13503206.11
Gray/brown silt.
HT18-10
10/22/18
15:55
314685.39
13502703.88
Gray/brown sand with a few pieces of SAV. Two attempts
consolidated into one tray.
HT18-11
10/22/18
15:21
314797.63
13502055.71
Gray/brown silt with just a few pieces of SAV. No sheen,
but silt left slightly greasy markings on gloves.
HT18-12
10/22/18
14:20
314913.81
13501317.15
Dark Gray/brown silt with some SAV. Live juvenile
lamprey in grab.
HT18-13
10/29/18
9:50
314783.68
13499999.58
Gray silt with light brown film on top.
HT18-14
10/29/18
9:00
314381.03
13498806.20
Brown sand/silt with gravel and mussel shells. Trace
organic wood debris. Two ponar attempts consolidated into
one tray.
HT18-15
10/24/18
16:50
314141.47
13498434.92
Gray/brown silt with sand, mussel shells, and a few pieces
of SAV.
HT18-16
10/24/18
15:45
314006.21
13498058.48
Gray silt/sand mixt with brown film, a few mussel shells,
and SAV.
HT18-17
10/24/18
15:00
313640.54
13498052.60
Gray/brown sand/silt mix with mussel shells and
invertebrates.
HT18-18
10/24/18
11:45
313829.97
13497704.09
Gray silt with light brown film and few pieces of SAV.
HT18-19
10/24/18
11:15
313724.96
13497447.99
Gray/brown silt/sand mix with mussel shells and a few
pieces of SAV. Native mussel shells present in addition to
the dreissenids. Two attempts consolidated into one tray.
HT18-20
10/24/18
10:15
313503.46
13496776.66
Gray/brown silt with sand and mussel shells, and some live
invertebrates.
HT18-21
10/24/18
9:30
313369.05
13496309.93
Gray/brown silt, sand, and gravel mix with SAV and one
juvenile Goby. Four attempts consolidated into one tray.
HT18-22
-
-
-
-
No samples collected here, location abandoned
HT18-23
10/23/18
17:15
313212.97
13495482.52
Gray silt with SAV.
HT18-24
10/23/18
16:10
313026.65
13495347.65
Gray/brown silt with sand.
HT18-25
10/23/18
15:00
312941.41
13495136.25
Gray/brown silt with some very fine sand and SAV.
HT18-26
10/23/18
14:40
312652.58
13494738.30
Gray/brown silt with sand, mussel shell fragments, and a
few pieces of SAV. Two ponar attempts consolidated into
on tray.
HT18-27
-
-
-
-
No surface samples collected. First through third attempts
contained 90% mussel shells. Moved 10 ft and underwent
an additional three attempts that contained mussels and
sand.
HT18-28
-
-
-
-
No samples collected here, location abandoned
HT18-29
10/22/18
11:35
311376.81
13493301.66
Sand with lots of mussel shells and some gravel. Three
attempts consolidated to get one volume.
HT18-30
10/22/18
9:55
309921.24
13492860.68
Gray silt with brown surface skin layer.
HT18-31
10/23/18
11:25
312523.64
13497037.48
Dark gray silt, light brown microbial layer on tip, a few
pieces of SAV.
HT18-32
10/23/18
10:50
311044.78
13494702.36
Dark gray silt with some gray and a few pieces of detritus.
NAD83 = North American Datum of 1983
PID = Photoionization Detector
ppm = parts per million
SAY = submerged aquatic vegetation
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 1
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.:6256136
TABLE 2-3 HARBORTOWN AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION CORE DATA
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER 2018)
Location ID
Sample
Processing
Date
Processing
Time
(Local)
Water
Surface
Elevation
NAVD88 (ft)
Depth of Water
NAVD88 (ft)
Sediment
Surface
Elevation
NAVD88 (ft)
Surface
(Ponar)
Sample
(Y/N)
Sediment Core
Penetration
Depth (ft)
Sediment
Recovery (ft)
Percent
Recovery
Collection Method
Collected to
Refusal
(Y/N)
HT18-01
10/30/2018
9:40
575.3
7.1
568.2
Y
8.8
8.2
94
Sonic Coring
Y
HT18-02
10/30/2018
11:00
575.3
10.1
565.2
Y
10.0
9.0
90
Sonic Coring
N
HT18-03
10/30/2018
13:55
575.3
17.5
557.8
Y
6.3
5.9
94
Sonic Coring
Y
HT 18-04
10/29/2018
12:15
575.3
8.4
566.9
Y
6.0
4.2
70
Sonic Coring
Y
HT18-05
10/30/2018
16:30
575.3
15.5
559.8
Y
6.5
5.5
85
Sonic Coring
Y
HT18-06
10/29/2018
14:10
575.4
17.1
558.3
Y
10.0
9.2
92
Sonic Coring
N
HT18-07
10/29/2018
14:30
573.4
10.1
565.3
Y
10.0
8.6
86
Sonic Coring
N
HT18-08
10/23/2018
17:10
575.4
8.8
566.6
Y
10.0
8.0
80
Sonic Coring
N
HT18-09
10/23/2018
13:45
575.4
9.7
565.7
Y
10.0
9.6
96
Sonic Coring
N
HT18-10
10/24/2018
9:40
575.4
5.0
570.4
Y
2.0
1.1
53
Sonic Coring
Y
HT18-11
10/27/2018
8:30
575.4
9.4
566.0
Y
10.0
9.4
94
Sonic Coring
N
HT18-12
10/23/2018
15:40
575.4
6.7
568.7
Y
10.0
9.7
97
Sonic Coring
N
HT18-13
10/29/2018
17:55
575.4
13.6
561.8
Y
10.0
9.6
96
Sonic Coring
N
HT18-14
10/30/2018
8:50
575.4
19.4
556.0
Y
3.0
1.9
63
Sonic Coring
Y
HT18-15
10/25/2018
10:10
575.5
19.4
556.1
Y
6.5
6.6
102
Sonic Coring
Y
HT18-163
10/24/2018
-
-
-
-
Y
-
-
-
-
-
HT18-17
10/25/2018
11:20
575.5
27.1
548.4
Y
4.5
4.6
102
Sonic Coring
Y
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 2
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.:6256136
TABLE 2-3 HARBORTOWN AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION CORE DATA
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER 2018)
Location ID
Sample
Processing
Date
Processing
Time
(Local)
Water
Surface
Elevation
NAVD88 (ft)
Depth of Water
NAVD88 (ft)
Sediment
Surface
Elevation
NAVD88 (ft)
Surface
(Ponar)
Sample
(Y/N)
Sediment Core
Penetration
Depth (ft)
Sediment
Recovery (ft)
Percent
Recovery
Collection Method
Collected to
Refusal
(Y/N)
HT18-18
10/25/2018
12:05
575.5
15.0
560.5
Y
6.0
5.4
90
Sonic Coring
Y
HT18-19
10/25/2018
14:35
575.5
20.9
554.6
Y
3.3
3.0
92
Sonic Coring
Y
HT18-20
10/25/2018
15:05
575.5
25.9
549.6
Y
3.3
3.0
92
Sonic Coring
Y
HT18-21
10/25/2018
15:45
575.5
11.0
564.5
Y
2.0
1.8
88
Sonic Coring
Y
HT18-22b
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
HT18-23
10/24/2018
10:15
575.4
6.5
568.9
Y
10.0
9.2
92
Sonic Coring
N
HT18-24
10/24/2018
11:40
575.4
14.7
560.7
Y
9.0
7.8
87
Sonic Coring
Y
HT18-25
10/24/2018
15:10
575.4
8.5
566.9
Y
10.0
9.5
95
Sonic Coring
N
HT18-26
10/24/2018
16:10
575.4
6.9
568.5
Y
10.0
9.5
95
Sonic Coring
N
HT18-27
10/24/2018
17:10
575.3
15.0
560.3
Nc
3.0
2.0
67
Sonic Coring
Y
HT18-28b
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
HT18-29
10/23/2018
12:00
575.4
23.4
552.0
Y
1.5
1.2
80
Sonic Coring
Y
HT18-30
10/23/2018
10:35
575.4
11.4
564.0
Y
10.0
9.2
92
Sonic Coring
N
HT18-31
10/25/2018
8:30
575.4
6.3
569.ld
Y
6.8
6.6
98
Sonic Coring
Y
HT18-32
10/24/2018
18:00
575.4
9.7
565.7
Y
7.0
7.1
101
Sonic Coring
Y
Note: all samples collected by Cetacean Marine.
a. No Cores collected here, less than 1 ft of recovery, ponar was collected
b. No Samples collected, location abandoned
c. Surface sample was abandonded after 6 ponar attempts without any usable sample material.
d. Estimated Value
ft = Foot (feet).
NAVD88 = North American Vertical Datum of 1988.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 2
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.:6256136
TABLE 2-4 HARBORTOWN UPSTREAM AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION ACTUAL ANALYTICAL PROGRAM
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER 2018)
Analytical (;roup unci N
el hod
Analvlica
lnter\ al-<
Locution II)
Sample Depth Inlenal
(I'D
34 PAHs1
EPA CLP SOM02.4
Total Michigan Metals +
Iron and Nickel
EPA CLP ISM02.4
PCB - Aroclors
EPA CLP SOM02.4
SEM/AVS
EPA-821-R-91-100/
SW846 6010C/7470A
Total Organic Carbon
Lloyd Kahn
Percent Moisture
ASTM D2216
Grain Size
(with hydrometer)
ASTM D422
Total Cyanide
SW846 9012B
WAD Cyanide
SM4500_CN_I
DRO/MRO2
SW846 8015B
Start of Interval (ft)
End of Interval (ft)
HT18-01
Surface4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0-3.05
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
3
3.0-5.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
3
5
5.0-7.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
5
7
7.0-8.5
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
7
8.6
HT18-02
Surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
3
3.0-6.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
3
6.1
6.0-8.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
6.1
7.8
8.0-9.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
7.8
9.2
HT18-03
Surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
3
3.0-4.5
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
3
5
4.5-6.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
4.6
6
HT18-04
Surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
0.0-0.5
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0.6
0.5-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0.6
3.3
3.0-4.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
3.3
4.3
HT18-05
Surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
2.7
3.0-5.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
2.7
5.1
5.0-6.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
5.1
5.9
HT18-06
Surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
3
3.0-6.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
3
6
6.0-7.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
6
7.1
7.0-8.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
7.1
8.1
8.0-10
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
8.1
9.7
HT18-07
Surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
0.0-2.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1.8
2.0-5.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1.8
4.8
5.0-7.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
4.8
7
7.0-9.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
7
8.9
HT18-08
Surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0-2.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
2.3
2.0-4.5
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
2.3
4.6
4.5-6.5
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
4.6
6.5
6.5-8.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
6.5
8
HT18-09
Surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
3
3.0-5.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
3
5
5.0-7.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
5
7
7.0-10
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
7
9.7
HT18-10
Surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1.1
HT18-11
Surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
3
3.0-5.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
3
5
5.0-7.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
5
7
7.0-10
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
7
9.4
HT18-12
Surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
3
3.0-5.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
3
5
5.0-7.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
5
7
7.0-10
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
7
9.7
HT18-13
Surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
3
3.0-5.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
3
5
5.0-6.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
5
6.3
6.0-9.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
6.3
8.8
9.0-10
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
8.8
10
HT18-14
Surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1.3
1.0-2.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1.3
1.9
HT18-15
Surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
0.0-0.5
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0.5
0.5-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0.5
3
3.0-5.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
3
5
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 2
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.:6256136
TABLE 2-4 HARBORTOWN UPSTREAM AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION ACTUAL ANALYTICAL PROGRAM
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER 2018)
Analytical (iroup and N
el hod
Analvtica
lnter\ al"'
Locution II)
Sample Depth Intenal
(I'D
34 PAHs1
EPA CLP SOM02.4
Total Michigan Metals +
Iron and Nickel
EPA CLP ISM02.4
PCB - Aroclors
EPA CLP SOM02.4
SEM/AVS
EPA-821-R-91-100/
SW846 6010C/7470A
Total Organic Carbon
Lloyd Kahn
Percent Moisture
ASTM D2216
Grain Size
(with hydrometer)
ASTM D422
Total Cyanide
SW846 9012B
WAD Cyanide
SM4500_CN_I
DRO/MRO2
SW846 8015B
Start of Interval (ft)
End of Interval (ft)
HT18-16
Surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
HT18-17
Surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
3
3.0-5.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
3
4.7
HT18-18
Surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
0.0-2.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1.9
2.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1.9
2.8
3.0-3.5
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
2.8
3.6
3.5-5.5
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
3.6
5.4
HT18-19
Surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0-2.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
2.3
2.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
2.3
2.8
HT18-20
Surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0.8
1.0-2.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0.8
1.8
2.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1.8
2.8
HT18-21
Surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
0.0-1.5
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1.7
HT18-22
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
HT18-23
Surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
3
3.0-5.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
3
5
5.0-7.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
5
7
7.0-10
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
7
9.2
HT 18-24
Surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0-2.5
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
2.7
2.5-5.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
2.7
5
5.0-6.5
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
5
6.6
6.5-7.5
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
6.6
7.8
HT18-25
Surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
3
3.0-4.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
3
4.2
4.0-7.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
4.2
7
7.0-10
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
7
9.5
HT18-26
Surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
3
3.0-5.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
3
5
5.0-7.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
5
7
7.0-10
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
7
9.5
HT18-27
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0.8
1.0-2.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0.8
2.4
HT18-28
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
HT18-29
Surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1.2
HT18-30
Surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
3
3.0-5.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
3
5
5.0-7.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
5
7
7.0-10
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
7
9.2
HT 18-31
Surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1.3
1.0-2.5
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1.3
2.6
2.5-5.5
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
2.6
5.7
5.5-6.5
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
5.7
6.6
HT 18-32
Surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
3
3.0-5.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
3
5
5.0-7.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
5
7
Total Sediment Samples
142
142
142
29
142
142
29
29
29
29
Held Quality Control Samples
liekl Duplicate (In",, of samples)
15
15
15
3
15
15
3
3
3
3
\laln\ Spike \laln\ Spike Duplicate ( 5".) of samples)
8
8
8
2
8
0
0
2
2
2
Total Samples
l(>5
l(>5
l(>5
33
165
157
32
34
34
34
NOTES:
1. 34 PAHs include: acenaphthene; acenaphthylene; anthracene; fluorine; naphthalene; 2-methylnapthalene; phenanthrene; benzo(a)anthracene; benzo(a)pyrene; benzo(e)pyrene; benzo(b)fluoranthene;
benzo(g,h,i)perylene; benzo(k)fluoranthene; chrysene; dibenz(a,h)anthracene; fluoranthene; indeno(l,2,3-c,d)pyrene; pyrene; CI naphthalenes; C2 naphthalenes; C3 naphthalenes; CI fluorenes; C4
naphthalenes; CI phenanthrenes; C2 fluorenes; C2 phenanthrenes; C3 fluorenes; CI fluoranthenes; C3 phenanthrenes; C4 phenanthrenes; CI chrysenes; perylene; C2 chrysenes; C3 chrysenes; and C4
chrysenes.
2. DRO includes CIO to C20; MRO includes C20 to C36.
3. Analytical intervals were modified in the field based on consultation with EPA. They were defined by visible lithological changes and signs of contamination in the core.
4. Field duplicate taken at sample intervals marked yellow.
5. Volume collected for Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicates from the sample intervals and marked green.
— = no sample collected
CLP = Contract Laboratory Program.
EPA = U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
SEM/AVS = Simultaneously extracted metal/Acid volatile sulfide.
WAD = Weak acid dissociable.
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 2
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
62561.36
TABLE 3-1 SUMMARY OF EXCEEDANCES, HT
Total Number of
Percentage of
Total Number of
Submitted
Total Number of
Number of
Number of
Percentage of
Percentage of
Samples That
Submitted
Samples (W ithont
Detects (Without
SEM/AVS
TEC
PEC
Samples that
Samples That
Exceed SEM/AVS
A n :il vie
Samples
FDs)
FDs)
TEC
PEC
Ratio > 1
Exceed a nces
Exceed nines
Units
Exceeded TEC
Exceeded PEC
Ratio of 1
SEM/AVS
SEM/AVS Ratio
32
29
28
NA
NA
3
NA
NA
none
NA
NA
10.3
PAHs
Total PAH 17 ND=1/2RL
157
142
142
1,610
22,800
NA
81
8
Mg/kg
57.0
5.6
NA
PCB Aroclors
Total PCBs ND=0
157
142
83
59.8
676
NA
38
9
Mg/kg
26.8
6.3
NA
Metals
Arsenic
157
142
142
9.79
33
NA
26
1
mg/kg
18.3
0.7
NA
Barium
157
142
142
NSL
NSL
NA
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
NSL
NSL
NA
Cadmium
157
142
113
0.99
4.98
NA
51
24
mg/kg
35.9
16.9
NA
Chromium
157
142
142
43.4
111
NA
26
6
mg/kg
18.3
4.2
NA
Copper
157
142
142
31.6
149
NA
68
7
mg/kg
47.9
4.9
NA
Iron
157
142
142
20000(a)
40000(a)
NA
41
0
mg/kg
28.9
0.0
NA
Lead
157
142
142
35.8
128
NA
71
29
mg/kg
50.0
20.4
NA
Mercury
157
142
98
0.18
1.06
NA
46
12
mg/kg
32.4
8.5
NA
Nickel
157
142
142
22.7
48.6
NA
74
17
mg/kg
52.1
12.0
NA
Selenium
157
142
64
NSL
NSL
NA
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
NSL
NSL
NA
Silver
157
142
62
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
NA
14
7
mg/kg
9.9
4.9
NA
Zinc
157
142
142
121
459
NA
60
17
mg/kg
42.3
12.0
NA
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003.
NOTES:
Hg/kg = micrograms per kilogram.
AVS = Acid volatile sulfides.
FD = Field Duplicate.
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram.
NA = Not Applicable .
ND = Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
RL= reporting limit.
SEM = Simultaneously extracted metals.
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 1
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-2 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR GRAIN SIZE, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT18-01
HT18-01
HT 18-02
HT18-03
HT 18-04
HT18-05
HT18-06
HT18-07
HT 18-01-SURF
HT18-01-SURF-FD
HT18-02-SURF
HT18-03-SURF
HT18-04-SURF
HT18-05-SURF
HT18-06-SURF
HT18-07-SURF
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Gravel
%
0
0.3
0.8
0.2
0
0
0
0
Coarse Sand
0/
/o
0
0.1
0.8
0.5
0.8
1.5
0.5
0.4
Medium Sand
0/
/o
2.7
1.8
2.6
4.5
1.2
3.4
2
1.8
Fine Sand
0/
/o
7.6
7.9
10.8
38.6
40.3
15.7
10.7
54.6
Sand
0/
/o
10.3
9.8
14.2
43.6
42.3
20.6
13.2
56.8
Silt
0/
/o
62.8
62.6
65.8
37.9
44.8
60.9
62.3
34.5
Clay
0/
/o
26.9
27.3
19.2
18.3
12.9
18.5
24.5
8.7
Silt + Clay
0/
/o
89.7
89.9
85.0
56.2
57.7
79.4
86.8
43.2
Hydrometer and Sieve Analysis
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
% passed
100
99.7
99.2
99.8
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
% passed
100
99.6
98.4
99.3
99.2
98.5
99.5
99.6
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
% passed
97.8
98.1
96.8
96.9
98.3
95.9
98
98.7
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
% passed
97.3
97.8
95.8
94.8
98
95.1
97.5
97.8
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
% passed
96.5
97.1
94.3
91.2
96.4
94.1
96.7
91.6
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
% passed
95.6
96.5
93.1
84.1
90.8
93.1
96.1
74.5
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
% passed
95.1
95.8
91.9
76.1
81.4
92
95.3
63.2
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
% passed
89.7
89.9
85
56.2
57.7
79.4
86.8
43.2
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
% passed
57.0
53.9
41.8
50.2
27.9
36.3
44.3
16.4
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
% passed
47.8
44.6
36.5
34.8
24.4
31.9
40.3
14.3
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
% passed
40.0
40.6
29.9
27.8
19.9
27.4
35.1
12.9
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
% passed
33.4
34
24.6
23
16.4
24.4
29.8
10.8
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
% passed
26.9
27.3
19.2
18.3
12.9
18.5
24.5
8.7
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
% passed
19.0
20.6
15.3
11.2
10.2
14.1
17.9
6.6
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
% passed
12.4
14
10
6.5
7.5
8.2
12.6
4.5
Notes:
% = percent passed
FD = Field Duplicate
HT= Harbortown Upstream Area
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-2 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR GRAIN SIZE, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT18-08
HT18-09
HT18-10
HT18-11
HT18-12
HT18-12
HT18-13
HT18-14
HT18-08-SURF
HT18-09-SURF
HT18-10-SURF
HT18-11-SURF
HT18-12-SURF
HT18-12-SURF-FD
HT18-13-SURF
HT18-14-SURF
10/22/2018
10/22/2018
10/22/2018
10/22/2018
10/22/2018
10/22/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Gravel
%
0
0
9.1
0
0
0
0
55.8
Coarse Sand
0/
/o
0.9
0
0.4
0.6
0.7
1.9
1.1
11.5
Medium Sand
0/
/o
1.8
1.9
8.8
3.0
1.6
1.4
1.0
8.8
Fine Sand
0/
/o
5.3
2.9
77.5
7.6
16.5
14.3
8.5
14
Sand
0/
/o
8.0
4.8
86.7
11.2
18.8
17.6
10.6
34.3
Silt
0/
/o
66.5
64.6
2.1
61.1
64.6
66.9
58.5
6.2
Clay
0/
/o
25.5
30.6
2.1
27.7
16.6
15.5
30.9
3.7
Silt + Clay
0/
/o
92.0
95.2
4.2
OO
00
00
81.2
82.4
89.4
9.9
Hydrometer and Sieve Analysis
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
91.3
100
100
100
100
61.7
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
90.9
100
100
100
100
44.2
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
% passed
99.1
100
90.5
99.4
99.3
98.1
98.9
32.7
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
% passed
97.9
98.4
89.6
97
98.4
97.2
98
28.7
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
% passed
97.3
98.1
81.7
96.4
97.7
96.7
97.9
23.9
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
% passed
96.7
97.9
24.3
95.6
95.2
95.8
97.6
17.5
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
% passed
96.1
97.8
10.8
94.7
93.6
94.5
97.2
13.9
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
% passed
95.6
97.5
7.3
93.6
92
92.7
96.4
12.6
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
% passed
92
95.2
4.2
OO
OO
00
81.2
82.4
89.4
9.9
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
% passed
48.6
65.6
4.4
57.8
45.1
40.3
58.3
10.5
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
% passed
45.6
53.4
3.5
49.9
38.3
31.6
51.5
7.7
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
% passed
39.4
42.9
3
38.8
28
25.4
46
6.6
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
% passed
31.7
37.6
2.6
34.1
22.3
18
37.7
4.3
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
% passed
25.5
30.6
2.1
27.7
16.6
15.5
30.9
3.7
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
% passed
19.3
21.9
1.6
19.8
10.9
10.5
22.6
2.6
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
% passed
13.1
14.9
1.2
13.5
8.6
6.8
15.8
2
Notes:
% = percent passed
FD = Field Duplicate
HT= Harbortown Upstream Area
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-2 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR GRAIN SIZE, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT18-15
HT18-16
HT18-17
HT18-18
HT18-19
HT18-20
HT18-21
HT18-23
HT18-15-SURF
HT18-16-SURF
HT18-17-SURF
HT18-18-SURF
HT18-19-SURF
HT18-20-SURF
HT 18-21-SURF
HT18-23-SURF
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/23/2018
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Gravel
%
16.9
0
16.4
0.8
6.5
19.3
55.7
0
Coarse Sand
0/
/o
7
5.9
6.4
0.9
6.7
1.7
12.5
0.7
Medium Sand
0/
/o
8.6
11.7
9.2
2.9
7.9
2.1
9.9
0.5
Fine Sand
0/
/o
54.3
16.8
51.4
29
65.4
45.6
9.6
5.4
Sand
0/
/o
69.9
34.4
67
32.8
80
49.4
32
6.6
Silt
0/
/o
7.0
58.5
10.4
51.0
9.2
20.6
10.4
67.1
Clay
0/
/o
6.2
7.1
6.2
15.4
4.3
10.7
1.9
26.3
Silt + Clay
0/
/o
13.2
65.6
16.6
66.4
13.5
31.3
12.3
93.4
Hydrometer and Sieve Analysis
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
74.8
100
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
91.3
100
93.8
100
99.1
89.7
58.7
100
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
% passed
83.1
100
83.6
99.2
93.5
80.7
44.3
100
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
% passed
76.1
94.1
77.2
98.3
86.8
79
31.8
99.3
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
% passed
72.7
00
00
00
72.7
96.2
83.4
77.9
27.2
98.9
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
% passed
67.5
82.4
68
95.4
78.9
76.9
21.9
98.8
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
% passed
50.5
73.1
52.6
92.8
66.8
74.6
17.3
98.7
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
% passed
37.1
68.9
34.6
86.1
50.2
68.8
15.5
98.3
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
% passed
29.5
67.5
26.3
79.4
34.2
59.8
14.3
97.9
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
% passed
13.2
65.6
16.6
66.4
13.5
31.3
12.3
93.4
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
% passed
12.1
21.4
12.1
32.3
9.5
25
4.5
52
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
% passed
10.3
13.1
10.6
29.4
8.4
20.3
3.6
44.9
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
% passed
8.6
11.6
8.6
25.4
7.2
17.1
3.2
40.6
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
% passed
7.4
8.6
7.1
20.4
5.5
13.9
2.4
34.9
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
% passed
6.2
7.1
6.2
15.4
4.3
10.7
1.9
26.3
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
% passed
4.4
4.9
4.7
11.4
3.2
9.1
1.5
19.2
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
% passed
3.3
3.4
3.2
7.5
2
6
0.6
12.1
Notes:
% = percent passed
FD = Field Duplicate
HT= Harbortown Upstream Area
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-2 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR GRAIN SIZE, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT 18-24
HT18-25
HT18-26
HT18-29
HT18-30
HT18-31
HT18-32
HT18-32
HT18-24-SURF
HT18-25-SURF
HT18-26-SURF
HT18-29-SURF
HT18-30-SURF
HT 18-31-SURF
HT18-32-SURF
HT18-32-SURF-FD
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/22/2018
10/22/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Gravel
%
8.4
0
0.9
41.6
0
0
1.5
0
Coarse Sand
0/
/o
2.8
0.7
0.7
17.1
1.1
1.2
0.8
0.8
Medium Sand
0/
/o
4.2
2.4
1.4
10.7
0.9
1.2
1.9
1.6
Fine Sand
0/
/o
49.2
14.9
61.8
16.1
6.3
5.5
13
12.6
Sand
0/
/o
56.2
18
63.9
43.9
8.3
7.9
15.7
15
Silt
0/
/o
27.2
57.8
28.6
13.4
49.7
60.2
61.1
61.9
Clay
0/
/o
8.3
24.2
6.6
1.1
42.0
31.9
21.7
23.1
Silt + Clay
0/
/o
35.5
82.0
35.2
14.5
91.7
92.1
82.8
85.0
Hydrometer and Sieve Analysis
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
94.4
100
100
85.9
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
% passed
91.6
100
99.1
58.4
100
100
98.5
100
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
% passed
00
00
be
99.3
98.4
41.3
98.9
98.8
97.7
99.2
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
% passed
87
97.6
97.6
36.8
98.4
98.1
96.5
98.1
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
% passed
84.6
96.9
97
30.6
98
97.6
95.8
97.6
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
% passed
77.2
94.8
94.4
21.1
96.4
96.5
93.2
96.2
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
% passed
60.1
92.3
88.5
17
95.8
95.5
91.6
94.6
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
% passed
48.8
90.4
81.1
15.8
95.4
94.9
90.5
93.3
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
% passed
35.4
82
35.2
14.5
91.7
92.1
82.8
85
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
% passed
14.7
43.6
14.9
1.9
67.9
70.8
58.2
55.2
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
% passed
14
39.5
13.5
1.5
60.1
59.5
48
48.8
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
% passed
12.5
33.9
10.7
1.5
55
45.7
36.9
39.1
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
% passed
9.7
29.8
8.7
1.5
45.9
38.2
26.8
31.6
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
% passed
8.3
24.2
6.6
1.1
42
31.9
21.7
23.1
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
% passed
6.1
18.7
5.2
0.6
31.7
23.2
15.7
16.6
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
% passed
3.9
11.8
3.1
0.2
21.3
15.7
10.6
12.3
Notes:
% = percent passed
FD = Field Duplicate
HT= Harbortown Upstream Area
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-01
HT 18-01
HT18-01
HT 18-01
HT18-01
HT 18-01
HT18-01
Sample Name:
HT 18-01-SURF
HT 18-01-SURF-FD
HT18-01-0010
HT18-01-1030
HT18-01-3050
HT18-01-5070
HT18-01-5070-FD
Sample Date:
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
Depth
nterval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
5-7
5-7
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
89 U
88 U
61 U
53 U
48 U
43 U
45 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
89 U
88 U
61 U
53 U
48 U
43 U
45 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
89 U
88 U
61 U
53 U
48 U
43 U
45 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
15 I
171
281
33 I
48 U
43 U
45 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
89 U
88 U
61 U
53 U
48 U
43 U
45 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
171
171
221
43 I
93
43 U
45 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
89 U
88 U
61 U
53 U
48 U
43 U
45 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
89 U
88 U
61 U
53 U
48 U
43 U
45 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
89 U
88 U
61 U
53 U
48 U
43 U
45 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
32
34
50
76
93
0
0
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater
than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
P = The relative percent difference between the two columns is greater than
40% between the two analytical results.
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-01
HT 18-02
HT 18-02
HT 18-02
HT 18-02
HT 18-02
HT 18-02
Sample Name:
HT18-01-7085
HT18-02-SURF
HT18-02-0010
HT18-02-1030
HT18-02-3060
HT18-02-6080
HT18-02-8090
Sample Date:
10/30/2018
10/29/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
Depth
nterval (ft):
7-8.6
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-6.1
6.1-7.8
7.8-9.2
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
81 U
68 U
44 U
45 U
43 U
41 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
81 U
68 U
44 U
45 U
43 U
41 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
81 U
68 U
44 U
45 U
43 U
41 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
171
25 I
44 U
45 U
43 U
41 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
81 U
68 U
44 U
45 U
43 U
41 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
15 I
23 I
44 U
45 U
43 U
41 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
81 U
68 U
44 U
45 U
43 U
41 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
81 U
68 U
44 U
45 U
43 U
41 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
81 U
68 U
44 U
45 U
43 U
41 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
0
32
48
0
0
0
0
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater
than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
P = The relative percent difference between the two columns is greater than
40% between the two analytical results.
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-03
HT 18-03
HT18-03
HT 18-03
HT18-03
HT 18-03
HT 18-04
Sample Name:
HT18-03-SURF
HT18-03-0010
HT18-03-1030
HT18-03-1030-FD
HT18-03-3045
HT18-03-4560
HT18-04-SURF
Sample Date:
10/29/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/29/2018
Depth
nterval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
3-4.6
4.6-6
0-0.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
86 U
85 U
61 U
61 U
52 U
39 U
69 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
86 U
85 U
61 U
61 U
52 U
39 U
69 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
86 U
85 U
61 U
61 U
52 U
39 U
69 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
1101
240
920
1400
490
39 U
69 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
86 U
85 U
61 U
61 U
52 U
39 U
69 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
110
85 U
970
1500
510
39 U
11 I
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
86 U
210
61 U
61 U
52 U
39 U
69 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
86 U
85 U
61 U
61 U
52 U
39 U
69 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
86 U
85 U
61 U
61 U
52 U
39 U
69 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
220
450
1890
2900
1000
0
11
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater
than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
P = The relative percent difference between the two columns is greater than
40% between the two analytical results.
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT 18-04
HT 18-04
HT 18-04
HT 18-04
HT18-05
HT 18-05
HT18-05
Sample Name:
HT18-04-0005
HT18-04-0530
HT18-04-0530-FD
HT18-04-3040
HT18-05-SURF
HT18-05-0010
HT18-05-1030
Sample Date:
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
Depth
nterval (ft):
0-0.6
0.6-3.3
0.6-3.3
3.3-4.3
0-0.5
0-1
1-2.7
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
42 U
44 U
44 U
38 U
96 U
90 U
88 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
42 U
44 U
44 U
38 U
96 U
90 U
88 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
42 U
44 U
44 U
38 U
96 U
90 U
88 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
42 U
44 U
44 U
38 U
401
321
100
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
42 U
44 U
44 U
38 U
96 U
90 U
88 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
3.91
44 U
44 U
38 U
561
65 I
110
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
42 U
44 U
44 U
38 U
96 U
90 U
88 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
42 U
44 U
44 U
38 U
96 U
90 U
88 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
42 U
44 U
44 U
38 U
96 U
90 U
88 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
3.9
0
0
0
96
97
210
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater
than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
P = The relative percent difference between the two columns is greater than
40% between the two analytical results.
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-05
HT 18-05
HT18-06
HT 18-06
HT18-06
HT 18-06
HT18-06
Sample Name:
HT18-05-3050
HT18-05-5060
HT18-06-SURF
HT 18-06-0010
HT18-06-1030
HT18-06-1030-FD
HT18-06-3060
Sample Date:
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
Depth
nterval (ft):
2.7-5.1
5.1-5.9
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
3-6
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
51 U
45 U
91 U
86 U
72 U
73 U
69 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
51 U
45 U
91 U
86 U
72 U
73 U
69 UI
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
51 U
45 U
91 U
86 U
72 U
73 U
69 UI
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
920
250
271
58 I
86
110
2501
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
51 U
45 U
91 U
86 U
72 U
73 U
69 UI
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
850
170
35 I
86 U
240
73 U
69 UI
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
51 U
45 U
91 U
401
72 U
68 I
4601
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
51 U
45 U
91 U
86 U
72 U
73 U
69 UI
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
51 U
45 U
91 U
86 U
72 U
73 U
69 UJ
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
1770
420
62
98
326
178
710
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater
than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
P = The relative percent difference between the two columns is greater than
40% between the two analytical results.
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 5 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-06
HT 18-06
HT18-06
HT 18-07
HT18-07
HT 18-07
HT18-07
Sample Name:
HT18-06-6070
HT18-06-7080
HT18-06-8010
HT18-07-SURF
HT18-07-0020
HT18-07-2050
HT18-07-5070
Sample Date:
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
Depth
nterval (ft):
6-7.1
7.1-8.1
8.1-9.7
0-0.5
0-1.8
1.8-4.8
4.8-7
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
46 U
47 U
48 U
58 U
41 U
54 U
48 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
46 U
47 U
48 U
58 U
41 U
54 U
48 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
46 U
47 U
48 U
58 U
41 U
54 U
48 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
690
4100
560
361
110
820
150
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
46 U
47 U
48 U
58 U
41 U
54 U
48 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
470
19001
510
43 I
220
780
570
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
46 U
47 U
48 U
58 U
41 U
54 U
48 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
46 U
47 U
48 U
58 U
41 U
54 U
48 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
46 U
47 U
48 U
58 U
41 U
54 U
48 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
1160
6000
1070
79
330
1600
720
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater
than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
P = The relative percent difference between the two columns is greater than
40% between the two analytical results.
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 6 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-07
HT 18-08
HT18-08
HT 18-08
HT18-08
HT 18-08
HT18-08
Sample Name:
HT18-07-7090
HT18-08-SURF
HT18-08-0010
HT18-08-1020
HT18-08-1020-FD
HT 18-08-2045
HT18-08-4565
Sample Date:
10/29/2018
10/22/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
Depth
nterval (ft):
7-8.9
0-0.5
0-1
1-2.3
1-2.3
2.3-4.6
4.6-6.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
49 U
110U
86 U
67 U
70 U
52 UI
44 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
49 U
110U
86 U
67 U
70 U
52 UI
44 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
49 U
110U
86 U
67 U
70 U
52 UI
44 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
49 U
171
86 U
67 U
70 U
52 UI
44 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
49 U
110U
86 U
67 U
70 U
52 UI
44 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
210
110U
281
75
521
13 I
44 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
49 U
161
86 U
67 U
70 U
52 UI
44 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
49 U
110U
86 U
67 U
70 U
52 UJ
44 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
49 U
110U
86 U
67 U
70 U
52 UJ
44 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
210
33
28
75
52
13
0
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater
than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
P = The relative percent difference between the two columns is greater than
40% between the two analytical results.
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 7 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-08
HT 18-09
HT18-09
HT 18-09
HT18-09
HT 18-09
HT18-09
Sample Name:
HT18-08-6580
HT18-09-SURF
HT18-09-0010
HT18-09-1030
HT18-09-3050
HT18-09-3050-FD
HT18-09-5070
Sample Date:
10/23/2018
10/22/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
Depth
nterval (ft):
6.5-8
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
3-5
5-7
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
40 U
100 U
95 U
73 U
66 U
66 U
71 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
40 U
100 U
95 U
73 U
66 U
66 U
71 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
40 U
100 U
95 U
73 U
66 U
66 U
71 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
40 U
28 I
95 U
391
471
61 I
921
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
40 U
100 U
95 U
73 U
66 U
66 U
71 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
40 U
100 U
95 U
73 U
66 U
66 U
71 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
40 U
191
291
261
341
53 I
561
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
40 U
100 U
95 U
73 U
66 U
66 U
71 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
40 U
100 U
95 U
73 U
66 U
66 U
71 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
0
47
29
65
81
114
148
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater
than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
P = The relative percent difference between the two columns is greater than
40% between the two analytical results.
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 8 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-09
HT18-10
HT18-10
HT18-11
HT18-11
HT18-11
HT18-11
Sample Name:
HT18-09-7010
HT18-10-SURF
HT18-10-0010
HT18-11-SURF
HT18-11-0010
HT18-11-1030
HT18-11-3050
Sample Date:
10/23/2018
10/22/2018
10/24/2018
10/22/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
Depth
nterval (ft):
7-9.7
0-0.5
0-1.1
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
55 U
44 U
39 U
110U
93 U
70 U
53 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
55 U
44 U
39 U
110U
93 U
70 U
53 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
55 U
44 U
39 U
110U
93 U
70 U
53 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
55 U
3.8 I
39 U
110U
93 U
70 U
53 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
2301
44 U
39 U
110U
241
70 U
53 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
55 U
4.41
39 U
110U
93 U
70 U
53 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
2301
44 U
39 U
13 I
141
31 I
58
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
55 U
44 U
39 U
110U
93 U
70 U
53 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
55 U
44 U
39 U
110U
93 U
70 U
53 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
460
8.2
0
13
38
31
58
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater
than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
P = The relative percent difference between the two columns is greater than
40% between the two analytical results.
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 9 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-11
HT18-11
HT18-12
HT18-12
HT18-12
HT18-12
HT18-12
Sample Name:
HT18-11-5070
HT18-11-7010
HT18-12-SURF
HT18-12-SURF-FD
HT18-12-0010
HT18-12-1030
HT18-12-3050
Sample Date:
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/22/2018
10/22/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
Depth
nterval (ft):
5-7
7-9.4
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
41 U
90 U
90 U
62 U
53 U
42 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
41 U
90 U
90 U
62 U
53 U
42 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
41 U
90 U
90 U
62 U
53 U
42 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
41 U
51 I
561
791
53 U
42 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
41 U
90 U
90 U
62 U
53 U
42 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
41 U
90 U
90 U
62 U
1801
42 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
41 U
391
371
45 I
53 U
42 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
41 U
90 U
90 U
62 U
38 I
42 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
41 U
90 U
90 U
62 U
53 U
42 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
0
0
90
93
124
218
0
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater
than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
P = The relative percent difference between the two columns is greater than
40% between the two analytical results.
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Page 10 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-12
HT18-12
HT18-13
HT18-13
HT18-13
HT18-13
HT18-13
Sample Name:
HT18-12-5070
HT18-12-7010
HT18-13-SURF
HT18-13-0010
HT18-13-1030
HT18-13-3050
HT18-13-5060
Sample Date:
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
Depth
nterval (ft):
5-7
7-9.7
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
5-6.3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
42 U
95 U
63 U
56 U
53 U
57 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
42 U
95 U
63 U
56 U
53 U
57 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
42 U
95 U
63 U
56 U
53 U
57 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
42 U
121
63 U
56 U
53 U
57 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
42 U
95 U
63 U
56 U
53 U
57 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
42 U
161
150
80
7.8 I
57 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
42 U
95 U
63 U
56 U
53 U
57 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
42 U
95 U
63 U
56 U
53 U
57 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
42 U
95 U
63 U
56 U
5.91
57 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
0
0
28
150
80
13.7
0
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater
than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
P = The relative percent difference between the two columns is greater than
40% between the two analytical results.
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 11 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-13
HT18-13
HT18-13
HT18-14
HT18-14
HT18-14
HT18-15
Sample Name:
HT18-13-6090
HT18-13-6090-FD
HT18-13-9010
HT18-14-SURF
HT18-14-0010
HT18-14-1020
HT18-15-SURF
Sample Date:
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/24/2018
Depth
nterval (ft):
6.3-8.8
6.3-8.8
8.8-10
0-0.5
0-1.3
1.3-1.9
0-0.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
46 U
40 U
49 U
42 U
44 U
60 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
46 U
40 U
49 U
42 U
44 U
60 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
46 U
40 U
49 U
42 U
44 U
60 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
46 U
40 U
9.21
42 U
44 U
60 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
46 U
40 U
49 U
42 U
44 U
60 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
46 U
40 U
11 I
130
9.5 I
491
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
46 U
40 U
49 U
42 U
44 U
60 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
46 U
40 U
49 U
42 U
4.71
60 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
46 U
40 U
49 U
42 U
44 U
60 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
0
0
0
20.2
130
14.2
49
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater
than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
P = The relative percent difference between the two columns is greater than
40% between the two analytical results.
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Page 12 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-15
HT18-15
HT18-15
HT18-15
HT18-16
HT18-17
HT18-17
Sample Name:
HT18-15-0005
HT18-15-0530
HT18-15-3050
HT18-15-3050-FD
HT18-16-SURF
HT18-17-SURF
HT18-17-0010
Sample Date:
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/25/2018
Depth
nterval (ft):
0-0.5
0.5-3
3-5
3-5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
38 U
39 U
39 U
39 U
82 U
48 U
38 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
38 U
39 U
39 U
39 U
82 U
48 U
38 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
38 U
39 U
39 U
39 U
82 U
48 U
38 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
38 U
39 U
39 U
39 U
82 U
48 U
38 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
38 U
39 U
39 U
39 U
82 U
48 U
38 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
3.91
39 U
39 U
39 U
181
11 I
38 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
38 U
39 U
39 U
39 U
82 U
48 U
38 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
38 U
39 U
39 U
39 U
82 U
48 U
38 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
38 U
39 U
39 U
39 U
82 U
48 U
38 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
3.9
0
0
0
18
11
0
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater
than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
P = The relative percent difference between the two columns is greater than
40% between the two analytical results.
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 13 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-17
HT18-17
HT18-18
HT18-18
HT18-18
HT18-18
HT18-18
Sample Name:
HT18-17-1030
HT18-17-3050
HT18-18-SURF
HT18-18-0020
HT18-18-2030
HT18-18-3035
HT18-18-3555
Sample Date:
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/24/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
Depth
nterval (ft):
1-3
3-4.7
0-0.5
0-1.9
1.9-2.8
2.8-3.6
3.6-5.4
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
38 U
39 U
80 U
56 U
40 U
38 U
39 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
38 U
39 U
80 U
56 U
40 U
38 U
39 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
38 U
39 U
80 U
56 U
40 U
38 U
39 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
38 U
39 U
80 U
56 U
40 U
38 U
39 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
38 U
39 U
80 U
56 U
40 U
38 U
39 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
38 U
39 U
241
56 U
40 U
38 U
39 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
38 U
39 U
80 U
6.21
40 U
38 U
39 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
38 U
39 U
80 U
56 U
40 U
38 U
39 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
38 U
39 U
80 U
56 U
40 U
38 U
39 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
0
0
24
6.2
0
0
0
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater
than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
P = The relative percent difference between the two columns is greater than
40% between the two analytical results.
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Page 14 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-19
HT18-19
HT18-19
HT18-19
HT18-20
HT 18-20
HT18-20
Sample Name:
HT18-19-SURF
HT18-19-0010
HT18-19-1020
HT18-19-2030
HT18-20-SURF
HT 18-20-0010
HT18-20-1020
Sample Date:
10/24/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/24/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
Depth
nterval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-2.3
2.3-2.8
0-0.5
0-0.8
0.8-1.8
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
54 U
53 U
41 U
39 U
67 U
41 U
40 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
54 U
53 U
41 U
39 U
67 U
41 U
40 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
54 U
53 U
41 U
39 U
67 U
41 U
40 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
54 U
53 U
41 U
39 U
67 U
41 U
40 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
54 U
53 U
41 U
39 U
67 U
41 U
40 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
221
53 U
41 U
39 U
15 I
210
40 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
54 U
53 U
41 U
39 U
67 U
41 U
40 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
54 U
53 U
41 U
39 U
67 U
41 U
40 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
54 U
53 U
41 U
39 U
67 U
41 U
40 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
22
0
0
0
15
210
0
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater
than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
P = The relative percent difference between the two columns is greater than
40% between the two analytical results.
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 15 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-20
HT 18-20
HT18-21
HT 18-21
HT18-23
HT 18-23
HT18-23
Sample Name:
HT18-20-2030
HT18-20-2030-FD
HT 18-21-SURF
HT18-21-0015
HT18-23-SURF
HT18-23-0010
HT18-23-1030
Sample Date:
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/24/2018
10/25/2018
10/23/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
Depth
nterval (ft):
1.8-2.8
1.8-2.8
0-0.5
0-1.7
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
41 U
39 U
48 U
38 U
110U
44 U
41 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
41 U
39 U
48 U
38 U
110U
44 U
41 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
41 U
39 U
48 U
38 U
110U
44 U
41 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
41 U
39 U
48 U
38 U
110U
44 U
41 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
41 U
39 U
48 U
38 U
110U
44 U
41 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
41 U
39 U
8.3 I
38 U
121
241
41 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
41 U
39 U
48 U
25 I
110U
44 U
41 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
41 U
39 U
48 U
38 U
110U
44 U
41 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
41 U
39 U
48 U
38 U
110U
44 U
41 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
0
0
8.3
25
12
24
0
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater
than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
P = The relative percent difference between the two columns is greater than
40% between the two analytical results.
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 16 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-23
HT 18-23
HT18-23
HT 18-24
HT 18-24
HT 18-24
HT 18-24
Sample Name:
HT18-23-3050
HT18-23-5070
HT18-23-7010
HT18-24-SURF
HT18-24-0010
HT 18-24-1025
HT18-24-2550
Sample Date:
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/23/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
Depth
nterval (ft):
3-5
5-7
7-9.2
0-0.5
0-1
1-2.7
2.7-5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
43 U
46 U
73 U
42 U
42 U
44 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
43 U
46 U
73 U
42 U
42 U
44 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
43 U
46 U
73 U
42 U
42 U
44 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
43 U
46 U
73 U
42 U
42 U
44 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
43 U
46 U
73 U
42 U
42 U
44 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
43 U
46 U
291
42 U
42 U
44 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
43 U
46 U
73 U
42 U
42 U
44 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
43 U
46 U
73 U
42 U
42 U
44 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
43 U
46 U
73 U
42 U
42 U
44 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
0
0
0
29
0
0
0
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater
than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
P = The relative percent difference between the two columns is greater than
40% between the two analytical results.
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Page 17 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT 18-24
HT 18-24
HT 18-24
HT 18-25
HT18-25
HT 18-25
HT18-25
Sample Name:
HT18-24-5065
HT18-24-5065-FD
HT18-24-6575
HT18-25-SURF
HT18-25-0010
HT18-25-1030
HT18-25-3040
Sample Date:
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/23/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
Depth
nterval (ft):
5-6.6
5-6.6
6.6-7.8
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-4.2
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
40 U
39 U
99 U
56 U
65 U
54 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
40 U
39 U
99 UI
56 U
65 U
54 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
40 U
39 U
99 UI
56 U
65 U
54 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
40 U
39 U
99 UI
56 U
65 U
54 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
40 U
39 U
99 UI
56 U
65 U
54 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
40 U
39 U
99 UI
15 J
65 U
54 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
40 U
39 U
99 UJ
56 U
65 U
54 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
40 U
39 U
99 UJ
6.3 J
65 U
54 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 U
40 U
39 U
99 UJ
56 U
65 U
54 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
0
0
0
0
21.3
0
0
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater
than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
P = The relative percent difference between the two columns is greater than
40% between the two analytical results.
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 18 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-25
HT 18-25
HT18-26
HT 18-26
HT18-26
HT 18-26
HT18-26
Sample Name:
HT18-25-4070
HT18-25-7010
HT18-26-SURF
HT 18-26-0010
HT18-26-1030
HT18-26-3050
HT18-26-3050-FD
Sample Date:
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/23/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
Depth
nterval (ft):
4.2-7
7-9.5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
3-5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
43 U
62 U
41 U
40 U
43 U
43 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
43 U
62 U
41 U
40 U
43 U
43 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
43 U
62 U
41 U
40 U
43 U
43 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
43 U
62 U
41 U
40 U
43 U
43 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
43 U
62 U
41 U
40 U
43 U
43 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
43 U
501
41 U
40 U
43 U
43 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
43 U
62 U
41 U
40 U
43 U
43 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
43 U
62 U
41 U
40 U
43 U
43 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
43 U
62 U
41 U
40 U
43 U
43 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
0
0
50
0
0
0
0
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater
than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
P = The relative percent difference between the two columns is greater than
40% between the two analytical results.
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 19 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-26
HT 18-26
HT18-27
HT 18-27
HT18-29
HT 18-29
HT18-30
Sample Name:
HT18-26-5070
HT 18-26-7010
HT18-27-0010
HT 18-27-1020
HT18-29-SURF
HT 18-29-0010
HT18-30-SURF
Sample Date:
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/22/2018
10/23/2018
10/22/2018
Depth
nterval (ft):
5-7
7-9.5
0-0.8
0.8-2.4
0-0.5
0-1.2
0-0.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
43 U
43 U
41 U
41 U
40 U
85 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
43 U
43 U
41 U
41 U
40 U
85 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
43 U
43 U
41 U
41 U
40 U
85 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
43 U
43 U
41 U
41 U
40 U
221
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
43 U
43 U
41 U
41 U
40 U
85 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
43 U
181
41 U
41 U
40 U
85 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
43 U
43 U
41 U
25 I
221
8.61
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
43 U
43 U
41 U
41 U
40 U
85 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
43 U
43 U
41 U
41 U
40 U
85 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
0
0
18
0
25
22
30.6
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater
than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
P = The relative percent difference between the two columns is greater than
40% between the two analytical results.
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 20 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-30
HT18-30
HT18-30
HT18-30
HT18-30
HT 18-31
HT18-31
Sample Name:
HT18-30-0010
HT18-30-1030
HT18-30-3050
HT18-30-5070
HT18-30-7010
HT18-31-SURF
HT18-31-0010
Sample Date:
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/25/2018
Depth
nterval (ft):
0-1
1-3
3-5
5-7
7-10
0-0.5
0-1.3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
75 U
61 U
57 UI
53 U
57 U
91 U
57 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
75 U
61 U
57 UI
53 U
57 U
91 U
57 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
75 U
61 U
57 UI
53 U
57 U
91 U
57 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
75 U
61 U
57 UI
53 U
57 U
15 J
57 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
75 U
61 U
57 UI
35 J
57 U
91 U
57 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
75 U
1201
47 I-
53 U
12 J
8.3 J
41 J
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
11 I
61 U
57 UI
19 J
8.2 J
91 U
57 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
75 U
61 U
18 J-
53 U
57 U
91 U
57 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
75 U
61 U
57 UJ
15 J
9.2 J
91 U
57 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
11
120
65
69
29.4
23.3
41
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater
than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
P = The relative percent difference between the two columns is greater than
40% between the two analytical results.
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 21 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-31
HT 18-31
HT18-31
HT 18-32
HT18-32
HT 18-32
HT18-32
Sample Name:
HT18-31-1025
HT18-31-2555
HT18-31-5565
HT18-32-SURF
HT18-32-SURF-FD
HT 18-32-0010
HT18-32-0010-FD
Sample Date:
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
Depth
nterval (ft):
1.3-2.6
2.6-5.7
5.7-6.6
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
0-1
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
69 U
39 U
38 U
68 U
66 U
48 U
46 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
69 U
39 U
38 U
68 U
66 U
48 U
46 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
69 U
39 U
38 U
68 U
66 U
48 U
46 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
69 U
39 U
38 U
68 U
15 I
48 U
46 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
69 U
39 U
38 U
68 U
66 U
48 U
46 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
69 U
39 U
38 U
6.3 I
66 U
221
201
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
69 U
39 U
38 U
68 U
8.61
48 U
46 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
69 U
39 U
38 U
68 U
66 U
48 U
46 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
69 U
39 U
38 U
68 U
66 U
48 U
46 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
0
0
0
6.3
23.6
22
20
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater
than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
P = The relative percent difference between the two columns is greater than
40% between the two analytical results.
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 22 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-32
HT 18-32
HT18-32
Sample Name:
HT18-32-1030
HT18-32-3050
HT18-32-5070
Sample Date:
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
Depth
nterval (ft):
1-3
3-5
5-7
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
45 U
46 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
45 U
46 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
45 U
46 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
45 U
46 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
45 U
46 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
45 U
46 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
45 U
46 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
45 U
46 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
45 U
46 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
0
0
0
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater
than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
P = The relative percent difference between the two columns is greater than
40% between the two analytical results.
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 23 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
62561.36
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS, HT
Location ID:
HT 18-01
HT18-01
HT18-01
HT18-01
HT 18-01
HT 18-01
HT 18-01
HT18-01
HT 18-02
HT18-02
HT 18-02
Sample Name:
HT 18-01-SURF
HT18-01-SURF-FD
HT18-01-0010
HT18-01-1030
HT18-01-3050
HT18-01-5070
HT18-01-5070-FD
HT18-01-7085
HT18-02-SURF
HT 18-02-0010
HT18-02-1030
Sample Date:
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/29/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
5-7
5-7
7-8.6
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
8 J
4.6 J
6.7 J
7.7 J
8.3 J
3.3 J
21 J
10 J
9 J
5.9 J
16 J
2-Methylnaphthalene(a)
20.2
NSL
ug/kg
7.6 J
4.2 J
80 U
7.9 J
48 J
22 J
90 J
9.6 J
8.4 J
33 J
45 J
Acenaphthene(a)(b)
6.71
NSL
ug/kg
7.3 J
6.2 J
30 J
37 J
35 J
21 J
91
57
22 J
13 J
79
Acenaphthylene(a)(b)
5.87
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
29 U
80 U
66 U
48 U
2.6 J
12 J
44 U
8.7 J
33 U
45 U
Anthracene(a)(b)
57.2
845
ug/kg
13 J
11 J
29 J
90
63
36
170
69
67
26 J
110
Benzo(a)anthracene(3)(b)
108
1,050
ug/kg
120
72
220
250
210
94
400
180
210
120
190
Benzo(a)pyrene(a)(b)
150
1,450
ug/kg
160
92
80 J
160
110
64
280
130
170
99
160
Benzo(b)fluoranthene(a)(b)
10,400
NSL
ug/kg
290
170
300
290
190
73
310
130
280
190
140
Benzo(e)pyrene(b)
150
1,450
ug/kg
200
120
220
200
140
56
240
96
180
140
110
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene(a)(b)
170
NSL
ug/kg
170
96
210
140
130
54
230
44 J
140
150
98
Benzo(k)fluoranthene(a)(b)
240
NSL
ug/kg
220
120
300
240
200
82
350
130
220
170
160
CI Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
68 J
40 J
80 U
97 J
90 J
40 J
180 J
64 J
96 J
59 J
81 J
C1 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
29 U
80 U
66 U
48 U
22 U
90 U
44 U
53 U
33 U
45 U
C l-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
160 J
92 J
260 J
290 J
250 J
120 J
530 J
200 J
230 J
150 J
240 J
C 1-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
29 U
80 U
66 U
48 U
22 U
90 U
44 U
53 U
33 U
45 U
C 1-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
75 J
45 J
110 J
160 J
130 J
70 J
340 J
140 J
140 J
70 J
160 J
C2 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
29 U
80 U
66 U
48 U
22 U
90 U
44 U
53 U
33 U
45 U
C2 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
29 U
80 U
66 U
48 U
22 U
90 U
44 U
53 U
33 U
45 U
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
98 J
56 J
130 J
140 J
120 J
50 J
240 J
82 J
110 J
84 J
100 J
C2-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
29 U
80 U
66 U
48 U
22 U
130 J
44 U
53 U
33 U
62 J
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
59 J
36 J
80 U
120 J
91 J
42 J
250 J
79 J
83 J
51 J
84 J
C3 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
29 U
80 U
66 U
48 U
22 U
90 U
44 U
53 U
33 U
45 U
C3 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
29 U
80 U
66 U
49 J
22 U
99 J
44 U
53 U
38 J
45 U
C 3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene s
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
29 U
80 U
66 U
51 J
22 U
91 J
44 U
53 U
33 U
45 U
C3-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
54 J
33 J
80 U
79 J
49 J
25 J
210 J
46 J
58 J
46 J
48 J
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
29 U
80 U
88 J
70 J
22 U
160 J
44 U
53 U
33 J
45 U
C4 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
29 U
80 U
66 U
48 U
22 U
90 U
44 U
53 U
33 U
45 U
C4-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
71 J
43 J
80 U
85 J
51 J
22 U
190 J
44 U
59 J
48 J
45 U
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
45 U
29 U
80 U
69 J
51 J
22 U
100 J
44 U
53 U
33 U
45 U
u (a)(b)
Chrysene
166
1,290
ug/kg
270
150
340
320
240
100
430
170
280
200
200
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene(a)(b)
33
NSL
ug/kg
47
26 J
73 J
53 J
50
21 J
87 J
32 J
47 J
47
39 J
Fluoranthene(a)(b)
423
2,230
ug/kg
530
310
710
810
540
230 J
1100 J
440
660
360
490
Fluorene(a)(b)
77
536
ug/kg
16 J
10 J
40 J
54 J
37 J
16 J
80 J
45
37 J
19 J
58
Indeno( l,2,3-cd)pyrene(a)(b)
200
NSL
ug/kg
170
96
200
150
120
53
230
84
150
140
97
Naphthalene(a)(b)
176
561
ug/kg
8.3 J
5 J
80 J
8.3 J
48 J
22 J
90 J
14 J
8.5 J
33 J
45 J
Perylene(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
51
31
19 J
65 J
47 J
24
120
53
58
49
49
Phenanthrene(a)(b)
204
1,170
ug/kg
180
120
400
530
350
170 J
750 J
390
360
170
470
Pyrene(a)(b)
195
1,520
ug/kg
330
200
550
560
440
200 J
870 J
360
440
270
420
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
1,610
22,800
ug/kg
2562
1503
3642
3733
2835
1261
5570
2307
3109
2057
2824
Total PAH34 ND=1/2RL
1,610
22,800
ug/kg
3517
2084
4771
5242
3973
1737
8299
3217
4269
2840
3838
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = Microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
RL = Reporting limit
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
B = Compound was found in the blank and sample
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value
is an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
*TEC value based on USEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value
(EPA 2003)
(a) Analytes inlcuded in Total 17 PAH calculations
(b) Analytes inlcuded in Total 34 PAH calculations
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 14
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
62561.36
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS, HT
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
HT 18-02
HT 18-02
HT 18-02
HT18-03
HT 18-03
HT 18-03
HT 18-03
HT18-03
HT18-03
HT18-04
HT 18-04
HT18-02-3060
HT18-02-6080
HT18-02-8090
HT18-03-SURF
HT18-03-0010
HT18-03-1030
HT18-03-1030-FD
HT18-03-3045
HT18-03-4560
HT18-04-SURF
HT 18-04-0005
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/29/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
3-6.1
6.1-7.8
7.8-9.2
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
3-4.6
4.6-6
0-0.5
0-0.6
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
62 J
40 J
16 J
23 J
51 J
360
350
520
3.8 U
1.8 J
1.1 J
2-Methylnaphthalene(a)
20.2
NSL
ug/kg
220 J
210 J
100 J
30 J
340 J
300 J
300 J
260 J
3.8 U
2 J
0.87 J
Acenaphthene(a)(b)
6.71
NSL
ug/kg
440
170 J
83 J
31 J
77 J
230 J
240 J
240 J
3.8 U
2.7 J
1.8 J
Acenaphthylene(a)(b)
5.87
NSL
ug/kg
33 J
35 J
12 J
170 U
340 U
53 J
48 J
47 J
3.8 U
8.7 U
0.56 J
Anthracene(a)(b)
57.2
845
ug/kg
690
240
150
60 J
150 J
220 J
350
270
3.8 U
6.8 J
2.9 J
Benzo(a)anthracene(3)(b)
108
1,050
ug/kg
940
990
350
560
960
950
990
720
0.83 J
32
15
Benzo(a)pyrene(a)(b)
150
1,450
ug/kg
800
380
210
450
1100
840
870
550
3.8 U
31
17
Benzo(b)fluoranthene(a)(b)
10,400
NSL
ug/kg
650
720
260
1000
1400
1000
930
680
3.8 U
47
25
Benzo(e)pyrene(b)
150
1,450
ug/kg
520
530
200
730
1100
750
780
580
1.8 J
33
14
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene(a)(b)
170
NSL
ug/kg
470
470
190
580
1200
690
690
480
3.2 J
26
2.7 J
Benzo(k)fluoranthene(a)(b)
240
NSL
ug/kg
750
870
280
860
1300
910
1000
770
0.48 J
38
22
CI Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
400 J
420 J
160 J
240 J
540 J
920 J
940 J
820 J
5.1 J
15 J
7.8 J
C1 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
220 U
210 U
100 u
170 U
340 U
580 J
550 J
600 J
3.8 U
8.7 U
4.2 U
C l-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
1300 J
1300 J
450 J
670 J
1200 J
1900 J
1900 J
1700 J
7.1 J
29 J
18 J
C 1-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
220 U
210 U
100 u
170 U
340 U
350 J
330 J
440 J
3.8 U
8.7 U
4.2 U
C 1-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
1000 J
680 J
300 J
330 J
570 J
3000 J
2800 J
2900 J
15 J
18 J
9.7 J
C2 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
220 U
210 U
100 u
170 U
340 U
640 J
630 J
590 J
4.8 J
8.7 U
4.3 J
C2 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
220 U
210 U
100 u
170 U
340 U
1600 J
1500 J
1600 J
6.5 J
8.7 U
4.2 U
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
490 J
540 J
190 J
400 J
790 J
1600 J
1600 J
1500 J
11 J
21 J
11 J
C2-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
470 J
210 U
100 u
170 J
360 J
3800 J
3600 J
4700 J
17 J
8.7 U
4.9 J
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
490 J
380 J
160 J
380 J
730 J
4400 J
4200 J
4300 J
20 J
12 J
9.2 J
C3 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
220 U
210 U
100 u
170 U
340 U
480 J
460 J
440 J
4.1 J
8.7 U
4.2 U
C3 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
220 U
210 U
100 u
230 J
540 J
2100 J
2000 J
2100 J
9.8 J
8.7 U
4.5 J
C 3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene s
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
220 U
210 U
100 u
210 J
380 J
1100 J
1100 J
1100 J
7.7 J
8.7 U
5.2 J
C3-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
370 J
210 J
100 u
270 J
510 J
5900 J
5600 J
6900 J
38 J
9 J
8.7 J
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
220 U
210 U
100 u
330 J
740 J
4000 J
3800 J
3800 J
17 J
8.7 U
6.5 J
C4 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
220 U
210 U
100 u
170 U
340 U
300 U
300 U
260 U
3.8 U
8.7 U
4.2 U
C4-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
220 U
210 U
100 u
350 J
670 J
5100 J
5300 J
5700 J
56 J
12 J
13 J
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
220 U
210 U
100 u
260 J
570 J
2900 J
2700 J
2600 J
12 J
8.7 U
4.7 J
u (a)(b)
Chrysene
166
1,290
ug/kg
970
1100
370
1000
1600
1400
1400
1100
4
47
23
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene(a)(b)
33
NSL
ug/kg
180 J
210
73 J
170
380
250 J
260 J
170 J
3.8 U
7.7 J
5.2
Fluoranthene(a)(b)
423
2,230
ug/kg
2300
2400
890
2200
2900
2800
2700
2200
1.3 J
100
47
Fluorene(a)(b)
77
536
ug/kg
370
180 J
86 J
53 J
85 J
230 J
220 J
230 J
1 J
4.2 J
2.5 J
Indeno( l,2,3-cd)pyrene(a)(b)
200
NSL
ug/kg
460
500
190
580
1100
650
650
450
0.6 J
26
15
Naphthalene(a)(b)
176
561
ug/kg
220 J
210 J
100 J
25 J
340 J
300 J
300 J
260 J
3.8 U
2.6 J
0.66 J
Perylene(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
220
150 J
98 J
160 J
310 J
270 J
270 J
190 J
2.6 J
11
7.4
Phenanthrene(a)(b)
204
1,170
ug/kg
2200
1600
730
740
1100
1800
1800
1700
5.4
45
16
Pyrene(a)(b)
195
1,520
ug/kg
2000
1900
760
1400
2000
2000
2100
1700
2.5 J
68
32
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
1,610
22,800
ug/kg
13693
12185
4834
9824
16202
14623
14848
11827
34.5
490
229
Total PAH34 ND=1/2RL
1,610
22,800
ug/kg
19343
16800
6702
14424
24722
53163
52058
51657
255
671
352
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = Microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
RL = Reporting limit
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
B = Compound was found in the blank and sample
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value
is an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
*TEC value based on USEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value
(EPA 2003)
(a) Analytes inlcuded in Total 17 PAH calculations
(b) Analytes inlcuded in Total 34 PAH calculations
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 14
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
62561.36
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS, HT
Location ID:
HT 18-04
HT 18-04
HT 18-04
HT18-05
HT 18-05
HT 18-05
HT 18-05
HT18-05
HT18-06
HT18-06
HT 18-06
Sample Name:
HT18-04-0530
HT18-04-0530-FD
HT18-04-3040
HT18-05-SURF
HT18-05-0010
HT18-05-1030
HT18-05-3050
HT18-05-5060
HT18-06-SURF
HT 18-06-0010
HT18-06-1030
Sample Date:
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0.6-3.3
0.6-3.3
3.3-4.3
0-0.5
0-1
1-2.7
2.7-5.1
5.1-5.9
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
0.5 J
0.45 J
0.31 J
19 J
10 J
25 J
130 J
97 J
4.1 J
6.4 J
17 J
2-Methylnaphthalene(a)
20.2
NSL
ug/kg
4.4 U
4.3 U
3.8 U
23 J
45 J
87 J
500 J
220 J
4.9 J
6.6 J
23 J
Acenaphthene(a)(b)
6.71
NSL
ug/kg
0.34 J
4.3 U
3.8 U
43 J
13 J
27 J
560
220
5.8 J
7.2 J
13 J
Acenaphthylene(a)(b)
5.87
NSL
ug/kg
4.4 U
4.3 U
3.8 U
160 U
45 U
87 U
500 U
28 J
37 U
29 U
6.8 J
Anthracene(a)(b)
57.2
845
ug/kg
4.4 U
4.3 U
3.8 U
95 J
19 J
33 J
600
300
14 J
12 J
23 J
Benzo(a)anthracene(3)(b)
108
1,050
ug/kg
4.4 U
4.3 U
3.8 U
660
170
260
1600
1200
100
91
140
Benzo(a)pyrene(a)(b)
150
1,450
ug/kg
4.4 U
4.3 U
3.8 U
690
160
280
1200
830
120
110
150
Benzo(b)fluoranthene(a)(b)
10,400
NSL
ug/kg
1.5 J
0.86 J
0.66 J
1000
290
420
1200
1100
170
180
250
Benzo(e)pyrene(b)
150
1,450
ug/kg
0.88 J
0.64 J
0.49 J
700
210
310
870
820
120
100
150
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene(a)(b)
170
NSL
ug/kg
4.4 U
4.3 U
3.8 U
560
210
310
680
830
96
24 J
50
Benzo(k)fluoranthene(a)(b)
240
NSL
ug/kg
4.4 U
4.3 U
3.8 U
810
250
380
1300
1100
140
130
190
CI Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
4.4 U
4.3 U
3.8 U
350 J
140 J
170 J
830 J
690 J
64 J
43 J
83 J
C1 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
4.4 U
4.3 U
3.8 U
160 U
45 U
87 U
500 U
220 U
37 U
29 U
48 U
C l-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
4.4 U
4.3 U
3.8 U
680 J
210 J
390 J
2300 J
1400 J
110 J
110 J
200 J
C 1-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
4.4 U
4.3 U
3.8 U
160 U
45 U
87 U
500 U
220 U
37 U
29 U
48 U
C 1-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
4.4 U
4.3 U
3.8 U
310 J
89 J
200 J
1700 J
790 J
52 J
52 J
160 J
C2 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
4.4 U
4.3 U
3.8 U
160 U
45 U
87 U
500 U
340 J
37 U
29 U
48 U
C2 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
4.4 U
4.3 U
3.8 U
160 U
45 U
94 J
680 J
220 U
37 U
29 U
91 J
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
4.4 U
4.3 U
3.8 U
390 J
130 J
230 J
1100 J
830 J
66 J
65 J
120 J
C2-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
4.4 U
4.3 U
3.8 U
160 U
55 J
180 J
1600 J
500 J
37 U
29 J
130 J
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
4.4 U
4.3 U
3.8 U
270 J
85 J
250 J
1900 J
800 J
52 J
54 J
190 J
C3 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
4.4 U
4.3 U
3.8 U
160 U
45 U
87 U
500 U
220 U
37 U
29 U
48 U
C3 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
4.4 U
4.3 U
3.8 U
190 J
76 J
170 J
810 J
400 J
37 J
29 U
99 J
C 3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene s
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
4.4 U
4.3 U
3.8 U
160 J
53 J
110 J
580 J
440 J
37 U
29 U
63 J
C3-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
4.4 U
4.3 U
3.8 U
170 J
82 J
260 J
2600 J
590 J
38 J
50 J
230 J
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
4.4 U
4.3 U
3.8 U
210 J
72 J
230 J
1600 J
770 J
38 J
39 J
160 J
C4 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
4.4 U
4.3 U
3.8 U
160 U
45 U
87 U
500 U
220 U
37 U
29 U
48 U
C4-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
7.8 J
6.8 J
5 J
210 J
99 J
280 J
2500 J
550 J
52 J
80 J
330 J
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
4.4 U
4.3 U
3.8 U
160 J
52 J
210 J
1100 J
710 J
37 U
29 J
120 J
u (a)(b)
Chrysene
166
1,290
ug/kg
2 J
1.5 J
1.1 J
1000
300
480
1800
1400
170
160
240
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene(a)(b)
33
NSL
ug/kg
4.4 U
4.3 U
3.8 U
170
63
94
310 J
350
28 J
29
41 J
Fluoranthene(a)(b)
423
2,230
ug/kg
1.8 J
1.2 J
0.68 J
2300
530
830
4100
2600
360
310
510
Fluorene(a)(b)
77
536
ug/kg
4.4 U
4.3 U
3.8 U
62 J
19 J
40 J
420 J
240
9.2 J
11 J
23 J
Indeno( l,2,3-cd)pyrene(a)(b)
200
NSL
ug/kg
0.51 J
4.3 U
3.8 U
570
190
280
740
820
94
96
130
Naphthalene(a)(b)
176
561
ug/kg
4.4 U
4.3 U
3.8 U
23 J
45 J
87 J
500 J
260
4.7 J
5.7 J
12 J
Perylene(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
3.2 J
3 J
2.2 J
200
58
92
320 J
280
36 J
24 J
40 J
Phenanthrene(a)(b)
204
1,170
ug/kg
1 J
0.91 J
3.8 U
840
210
380
3000
1800
120
110
230
Pyrene(a)(b)
195
1,520
ug/kg
1.7 J
1.3 J
0.73 J
1400
420
670
3500
2100
220
220
350
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
1,610
22,800
ug/kg
30.9
31.6
27.9
10326
2957
4702
22260
15398
1675
1517
2382
Total PAH34 ND=1/2RL
1,610
22,800
ug/kg
73.5
72.1
62.2
14313
4275
7668
41820
24368
2417
2222
4462
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = Microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
RL = Reporting limit
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
B = Compound was found in the blank and sample
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value
is an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
*TEC value based on USEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value
(EPA 2003)
(a) Analytes inlcuded in Total 17 PAH calculations
(b) Analytes inlcuded in Total 34 PAH calculations
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 14
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
62561.36
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS, HT
Location ID:
HT 18-06
HT18-06
HT18-06
HT18-06
HT 18-06
HT 18-07
HT 18-07
HT18-07
HT18-07
HT18-07
HT 18-08
Sample Name:
HT18-06-1030-FD
HT18-06-3060
HT 18-06-6070
HT18-06-7080
HT18-06-8010
HT18-07-SURF
HT18-07-0020
HT18-07-2050
HT18-07-5070
HT 18-07-7090
HT18-08-SURF
Sample Date:
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/22/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
1-3
3-6
6-7.1
7.1-8.1
8.1-9.7
0-0.5
0-1.8
1.8-4.8
4.8-7
7-8.9
0-0.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
15 J
88 J
170
490
450
2.7 J
11 J
110 J
150
360
12 J
2-Methylnaphthalene(a)
20.2
NSL
ug/kg
20 J
130 J
150
550
550
3.3 J
14 J
64 J
150
520
9.7 J
Acenaphthene(a)(b)
6.71
NSL
ug/kg
11 J
49 J
110
130
150 J
5.8 J
26 J
77 J
73 J
100 J
8.5 J
Acenaphthylene(a)(b)
5.87
NSL
ug/kg
5.3 J
32 J
34 J
48 J
49 J
23 U
83 U
47 J
31 J
54 J
6.4 J-
Anthracene(a)(b)
57.2
845
ug/kg
17 J
86 J
160
160
150 J
20 J
52 J
120 J
110 J
120
21 J-
Benzo(a)anthracene(3)(b)
108
1,050
ug/kg
110
440
430
460
470
83
220
490
400
380
140 J-
Benzo(a)pyrene(a)(b)
150
1,450
ug/kg
130
430
400
370
390
77
190
420
350
320
60
Benzo(b)fluoranthene(a)(b)
10,400
NSL
ug/kg
220
650
520
550
540
110
240
540
460
430
270
Benzo(e)pyrene(b)
150
1,450
ug/kg
130
390
340
350
340
75
150
350
280
260
45
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene(a)(b)
170
NSL
ug/kg
39
120 J
110
100
100 J
54
44 J
99 J
87 J
63 J
28 UI
Benzo(k)fluoranthene(a)(b)
240
NSL
ug/kg
150
480
420
400
420
91
200
490
340
330
170
CI Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
61 J
230 J
300 J
510 J
460 J
31 J
87 J
610 J
330 J
560 J
69 J
C1 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
29 J
240 J
520 J
720 J
560 J
23 U
83 U
300 J
230 J
440 J
28 U
C l-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
160 J
660 J
810 J
1100 J
1000 J
85 J
250 J
1200 J
750 J
1000 J
190 J
C 1-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
29 U
140 J
200 J
690 J
630 J
23 U
83 U
130 U
210 J
600 J
28 U
C 1-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
120 J
570 J
1600 J
2400 J
2200 J
45 J
180 J
1800 J
1200 J
2000 J
88 J
C2 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
37 J
140 U
250 J
440 J
380 J
23 U
83 U
470 J
280 J
570 J
49 J
C2 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
73 J
630 J
1300 J
1700 J
1300 J
23 U
83 U
1100 J
710 J
1300 J
28 J
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
97 J
410 J
620 J
960 J
780 J
49 J
140 J
1000 J
560 J
1100 J
130 J
C2-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
110 J
800 J
2500 J
4100 J
4300 J
23 U
120 J
1900 J
1800 J
4500 J
48 J
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
150 J
800 J
2200 J
3400 J
3200 J
40 J
210 J
3600 J
2000 J
3800 J
90 J
C3 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
29 U
140 U
140 J
210 J
240 U
23 U
83 U
300 J
150 J
330 J
34 J
C3 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
84 J
600 J
1500 J
1900 J
1400 J
27 J
99 J
1300 J
810 J
1700 J
28 U
C 3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene s
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
62 J
220 J
500 J
700 J
690 J
25 J
83 U
960 J
470 J
1000 J
55 J
C3-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
190 J
1400 J
4600 J
6500 J
6500 J
34 J
250 J
4000 J
2900 J
6000 J
81 J
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
130 J
540 J
1700 J
2700 J
2700 J
30 J
170 J
3400 J
1800 J
3700 J
67 J
C4 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
29 U
140 U
89 U
96 J
240 U
23 U
83 U
130 U
120 U
120 J
28 U
C4-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
280 J
1900 J
4500 J
6300 J
6400 J
38 J
280 J
4700 J
3200 J
5900 J
130 J
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
100 J
320 J
1200 J
1900 J
1900 J
23 U
120 J
2500 J
1200 J
2800 J
48 J
u (a)(b)
Chrysene
166
1,290
ug/kg
200
680
600
700
700
120
280
740
570
630
210 J-
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene(a)(b)
33
NSL
ug/kg
32
99 J
86 J
95
83 J
20 J
45 J
93 J
75 J
61 J
42
Fluoranthene(a)(b)
423
2,230
ug/kg
400
1500
1400
1500
1700
270
690
1500
1300
1200
440
Fluorene(a)(b)
77
536
ug/kg
20 J
110 J
200
220
220 J
10 J
31 J
120 J
110 J
190
17 J
Indeno( l,2,3-cd)pyrene(a)(b)
200
NSL
ug/kg
110
340
260
240
250
58
120
260
210
180
66 J-
Naphthalene(a)(b)
176
561
ug/kg
11 J
25 J
110
140
43 J
3.1 J
83 U
22 J
26 J
23 J
6 J
Perylene(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
38
92 J
99
94 J
88 J
23
48 J
110 J
82 J
71 J
6.7 J
Phenanthrene(a)(b)
204
1,170
ug/kg
170
790
1200
1300
1400
120
380
930
920
1000
150
Pyrene(a)(b)
195
1,520
ug/kg
270
1000
980
1000
1300
180
540
1100
930
900
180 J-
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
1,610
22,800
ug/kg
1915
6961
7170
7963
8515
1237
3155
7112
6142
6501
1811
Total PAH34 ND=1/2RL
1,610
22,800
ug/kg
3631
16353
30824
42523
41563
1753
5354
34818
23984
41632
2831
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = Microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
RL = Reporting limit
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
B = Compound was found in the blank and sample
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value
is an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
*TEC value based on USEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value
(EPA 2003)
(a) Analytes inlcuded in Total 17 PAH calculations
(b) Analytes inlcuded in Total 34 PAH calculations
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 14
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS, HT
Analyte
1 -Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
(a)
Acenaphthene
(a)(b)
Acenaphthylene
(a)(b)
Anthracene
(a)(b)
Benzo(a)anthracene
(a)(b)
Benzo(a)pyrene
(a)(b)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
(a)(b)
Benzo(e)pyrene
(b)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene'
(a)(b)
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
(a)(b)
CI Chrysenes'
(b)
C1 Fluorenes
(b)
C 1-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
(b)
CI-Naphthalenes'
(b)
C 1-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
(b)
C2 Chrysenes1
(b)
C2 Fluorenes
(b)
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
C2-Naphthalenes'
(b)
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
(b)
C3 Chrysenes1
(b)
C3 Fluorenes
(b)
C 3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene s
C3-Naphthalenes'
(b)
C 3-Phenanthrene s/Anthracenes
(b)
C4 Chrysenes1
(b)
C4-Naphthalenes'
(b)
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
(b)
Chrysene
(a)(b)
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
(a)(b)
Fluoranthene
(a)(b)
Fluorene
(a)(b)
Indeno( l,2,3-cd)pyrene
(a)(b)
Naphthalene1
(a)(b)
Perylene
(b)
Phenanthrene
(a)(b)
Pyrene'
(a)(b)
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
Total PAH34 ND=1/2RL
TEC
NSL
20.2
6.71
5.87
57.2
108
150
10,400
150
170
240
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
166
33
423
77
200
176
NSL
204
195
1.610
1.610
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
PEC
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
845
1.050
1,450
NSL
1,450
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
1,290
NSL
2.230
536
NSL
561
NSL
1,170
1.520
22.800
22.800
Unit
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
-'g/kg
HT 18-08
HT18-08-0010
10/23/2018
0-1
HT18-08
HT18-08-1020
10/23/2018
1-2.3
HT18-08
HT18-08-1020-FD
10/23/2018
1-2.3
HT18-08
HT 18-08-2045
10/23/2018
2.3-4.6
HT 18-08
HT18-08-4565
10/23/2018
4.6-6.5
HT 18-08
HT18-08-6580
10/23/2018
6.5-8
HT 18-09
HT18-09-SURF
10/22/2018
0-0.5
HT18-09
HT18-09-0010
10/23/2018
0-1
7.3 J
7.7 J
7.1 J
43 U
6.9 J
100
62
260
180
180
200
58 J
43 U
150 J
43 U
67 J
43 U
43 U
95 J
43 U
75 J
43 U
63 J
46 J
75 J
66 J
43 U
98 J
43 U
220
41 J
410
13 J
150
4.4 J
42 J
130
270
2084
3122
38 J
45 J
120 J
220 U
180 J
850
550
920
650
570
840
310 J
220 U
870 J
220 U
440 J
220 U
220 U
460 J
220 U
320 J
220 U
220 U
220 U
220 J
230 J
220 U
220 J
220 U
1100
190 J
2300
130 J
530
47 J
210 J
1400
1700
11582
15997
29 J
35 J
86 J
16 J
440 J
500 J
1600
1000 u
3.4 J
5.1 J
6.3 J
3.1 J
140
690
12
460
780
510
500
620
250 J
140 U
680 J
140 U
330 J
140 U
140 U
370 J
140 J
260 J
140 U
140 J
140 J
170 J
180 J
140 U
170 J
140 J
850
170
4000
4200
3100
2200
4300
3200 J
1000 u
9500 J
1000 u
5800 J
2100 J
1500 J
5100 J
2100 J
5800 J
1100 J
1200 J
3100 J
2700 J
6000 J
1000 u
4400 J
4700 J
60
34
51
37
33
39
110 J
14 J
130 J
8.7 U
110 J
110 J
50 J
140 J
35 J
270 J
77 J
110 J
110 J
87 J
340 J
24 J
150 J
300 J
1800
95 J
480
34 J
170
930
1300
8986
12511
83
11
110
6.5 J
28
3.4 J
16
52
88
625
2595
1.1 J
0.85 J
0.61 J
4.1 U
4.1 U
2 J
1.5 J
3.2 J
2.6 J
4.1 U
1.7 J
5 J
4.1 U
8 J
4.1 U
7.7 J
4.2 J
4.2 J
8.3 J
5 J
15 J
4.1 U
5.1 J
6.5 J
10 J
14 J
4.1 U
20 J
12 J
0.46 J
5.1
1.2 J
1.2 J
0.85 J
6.9
3.2 J
4.9
37.92
164.97
5.6 J
5.3 J
51 U
51 R
10 J-
110 J-
140
230
160
110 J-
180
51 U
51 U
150 J
51 U
61 J
51 U
51 U
86 J
51 U
55 J
51 U
51 U
51 U
51 U
51 U
51 U
83 J
51 U
210 J-
36 J
380
12 J
130 J-
51 U
44 J
150
310 J-
2115
2969
9.6 J
11 J
7.9 J
39 U
18 J
140
190
330
230
240
250
68 J
39 U
180 J
39 U
80 J
51 J
39 U
120 J
47 J
79 J
39 U
62 J
51 J
80 J
63 J
39 U
100 J
46 J
280
61
500
17 J
220
7.9 J
61
180
350
2822
4056
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
HT18-09
HT18-09-1030
10/23/2018
1-3
12 J
13 J
14 J
6.8 J
20 J
170
180
320
220
190
250
90 J
37 U
230 J
37 U
120 J
50 J
71 J
130 J
110 J
150 J
37 U
37 U
68 J
180 J
120 J
37 U
200 J
89 J
300
49
570
26 J
170
9.8 J
67
230
430
2949
4725
HT18-09
HT18-09-3050
10/23/2018
3-5
5.7 J
6.6 J
8.1 J
33 U
25 J
100 J
110
150
100
93
120
52 J
33 U
120 J
33 U
72 J
33 U
33 J
68 J
46 J
78 J
33 U
50 J
33 J
78 J
61 J
33 U
86 J
52 J
150
29 J
300 J
14 J
87
3.6 J
35
130 J
200 J
1543
2482
HT 18-09
HT18-09-3050-FD
10/23/2018
3-5
18 J
22 J
37 J
10 J
71
320 J
320
450
290
270
320
130 J
66 U
350 J
66 U
220 J
73 J
110 J
220 J
130 J
220 J
66 U
170 J
96 J
210 J
170 J
66 U
240 J
140 J
440
87
920 J
52 J
250
23 J
100
500 J
640 J
4732
7395
62561.36
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = Microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
RL = Reporting limit
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
B = Compound was found in the blank and sample
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value
is an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
*TEC value based on USEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value
(EPA 2003)
(a) Analytes inlcuded in Total 17 PAH calculations
(b) Analytes inlcuded in Total 34 PAH calculations
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 5 of 14
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
62561.36
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS, HT
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
HT 18-09
HT18-09
HT18-10
HT18-10
HT18-11
HT18-11
HT18-11
HT18-11
HT18-11
HT18-11
HT18-12
HT18-09-5070
HT18-09-7010
HT18-10-SURF
HT18-10-0010
HT 18-11-SURF
HT18-11-0010
HT18-11-1030
HT18-11-3050
HT18-11-5070
HT18-11-7010
HT18-12-SURF
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/22/2018
10/24/2018
10/22/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/22/2018
5-7
7-9.7
0-0.5
0-1.1
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
5-7
7-9.4
0-0.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
27 J
130
6.7 J
1.1 J
10 J
5.1 J
12 J
6.6 J
0.78 J
1.1 J
14 J
2-Methylnaphthalene(a)
20.2
NSL
ug/kg
37 J
160
6.5 J
1.1 J
7.3 J
5.8 J
12 J
6.2 J
0.7 J
0.71 J
13 J
Acenaphthene(a)(b)
6.71
NSL
ug/kg
20 J
64 J
48
4.5
11 J
18 J
17 J
12 J
0.66 J
4.1 U
19 J
Acenaphthylene(a)(b)
5.87
NSL
ug/kg
16 J
40 J
44 R
2 J
5.2 J-
18 U
8.9 J
4.8 J
4.3 U
4.1 U
15 J-
Anthracene(a)(b)
57.2
845
ug/kg
48
160
99 J-
3.3 J
19 J-
8 J
33 J
21
0.58 J
4.1 U
40 J-
Benzo(a)anthracene(3)(b)
108
1,050
ug/kg
210
520
200 J-
14
120 J-
64
190
110
2.4 J
4.1 U
220 J-
Benzo(a)pyrene(a)(b)
150
1,450
ug/kg
240
490
67
12
83
87
200
110
2.2 J
0.56 J
110
Benzo(b)fluoranthene(a)(b)
10,400
NSL
ug/kg
350
700
140
19
230
150
280
130
3.7 J
1.8 J
250
Benzo(e)pyrene(b)
150
1,450
ug/kg
240
470
37 J
14
74
100
190
95
2.5 J
1.6 J
84
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene(a)(b)
170
NSL
ug/kg
230
290
44 UI
11
20 J-
94
180
82
2.4 J
4.1 U
19 J-
Benzo(k)fluoranthene(a)(b)
240
NSL
ug/kg
280
510
110
15
150
120
240
120
4.3 U
0.86 J
190
CI Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
130 J
390 J
84 J
20 J
60 J
30 J
88 J
66 J
4.3 U
4.1 U
110 J
C1 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
79 J
400 J
44 U
3.9 U
28 U
18 U
46 U
21 U
4.3 U
4.1 U
45 U
C l-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
280 J
880 J
250 J
30 J
150 J
85 J
230 J
140 J
5.4 J
4.3 J
260 J
C 1-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
47 U
200 J
44 U
3.9 U
28 U
18 U
46 U
21 U
4.3 U
4.1 U
45 U
C 1-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
220 J
1400 J
190 J
21 J
88 J
41 J
140 J
85 J
4.7 J
5.4 J
160 J
C2 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
64 J
380 J
48 J
19 J
35 J
23 J
52 J
30 J
4.3 U
4.1 U
61 J
C2 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
250 J
1100 J
44 U
7.3 J
28 U
24 J
74 J
35 J
4.3 U
4.1 U
45 U
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
190 J
740 J
110 J
28 J
110 J
55 J
140 J
82 J
4.3 J
4.7 J
170 J
C2-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
270 J
1700 J
64 J
8.4 J
42 J
24 J
92 J
48 J
4.3 U
4.8 J
72 J
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
290 J
2100 J
130 J
38 J
84 J
41 J
150 J
99 J
7.2 J
9.3 J
160 J
C3 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
47 U
200 J
44 U
9.2 J
28 U
18 U
46 U
21 U
4.3 U
4.1 U
45 U
C3 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
300 J
1500 J
44 U
16 J
28 U
18 U
110 J
56 J
4.3 U
4.1 U
45 U
C 3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene s
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
91 J
580 J
48 J
25 J
44 J
26 J
73 J
43 J
4.3 U
4.1 U
77 J
C3-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
450 J
3500 J
79 J
20 J
69 J
39 J
160 J
89 J
6.7 J
11 J
120 J
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
220 J
1800 J
62 J
43 J
60 J
30 J
120 J
86 J
6 J
7.5 J
120 J
C4 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
47 U
110U
44 U
3.9 U
28 U
18 U
46 U
21 U
4.3 U
4.1 U
45 U
C4-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
460 J
3900 J
74 J
26 J
110 J
48 J
150 J
100 J
9.5 J
17 J
160 J
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
200 J
1500 J
44 U
34 J
39 J
21 J
100 J
66 J
4.6 J
6.2 J
78 J
u (a)(b)
Chrysene
166
1,290
ug/kg
340
770
170 J-
22
190 J-
130
280
150
4.3
2.8 J
240 J-
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene(a)(b)
33
NSL
ug/kg
66
120
27 J
3.8 J
39
27
56
28
0.53 J
4.1 U
45
Fluoranthene(a)(b)
423
2,230
ug/kg
690
1500
430
38
370
240
570
290
7
2.7 J
550
Fluorene(a)(b)
77
536
ug/kg
46 J
140
61
2.8 J
18 J
7.9 J
28 J
17 J
0.75 J
0.86 J
34 J
Indeno( l,2,3-cd)pyrene(a)(b)
200
NSL
ug/kg
200
330
42 J-
10
79 J-
92
170
81
1.6 J
0.62 J
87 J-
Naphthalene(a)(b)
176
561
ug/kg
10 J
54 J
4.6 J
1.4 J
4.4 J
5.4 J
11 J
5.7 J
1 J
0.65 J
11 J
Perylene(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
68
150
10 J
14
17 J
28
62
45
12
24
20 J
Phenanthrene(a)(b)
204
1,170
ug/kg
320
950
360
22
160
87
270
150
3.8 J
2.4 J
260
Pyrene(a)(b)
195
1,520
ug/kg
460
1100
240 J-
29
200 J-
170
380
220
5.6
2.4 J
310 J-
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
1,610
22,800
ug/kg
3563
7898
2071
211
1706
1315
2926
1538
41.52
28.66
2413
Total PAH34 ND=1/2RL
1,610
22,800
ug/kg
7118
29363
3247
536
2611
1888
4724
2614
118.77
135.45
3940
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = Microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
RL = Reporting limit
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
B = Compound was found in the blank and sample
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value
is an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
*TEC value based on USEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value
(EPA 2003)
(a) Analytes inlcuded in Total 17 PAH calculations
(b) Analytes inlcuded in Total 34 PAH calculations
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 6 of 14
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
62561.36
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS, HT
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
HT18-12
HT18-12
HT18-12
HT18-12
HT18-12
HT18-12
HT18-13
HT18-13
HT18-13
HT18-13
HT18-13
HT18-12-SURF-FD
HT18-12-0010
HT18-12-1030
HT18-12-3050
HT18-12-5070
HT18-12-7010
HT 18-13-SURF
HT18-13-0010
HT18-13-1030
HT18-13-3050
HT18-13-5060
10/22/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
5-7
7-9.7
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
5-6.3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
14 J
32 J
68 J
220
1.1 J
1.2 J
3 J
16 J
28 J
27 J
12 J
2-Methylnaphthalene(a)
20.2
NSL
ug/kg
14 J
32 J
88 J
79 J
0.73 J
0.82 J
3.1 J
22 J
35 J
33 J
18 J
Acenaphthene(a)(b)
6.71
NSL
ug/kg
20 J
62 J
190 J
330
6
4.2 U
2.9 J
41 J
59 J
53 J
27 J
Acenaphthylene(a)(b)
5.87
NSL
ug/kg
12 J-
22 J
66 J
51 J
1.1 J
4.2 U
1.9 J
23 J
36 J
27 J
11 J
Anthracene(a)(b)
57.2
845
ug/kg
52 J-
180
280
350
4.3
4.2 U
6.7 J
70 J
100 J
110
55
Benzo(a)anthracene(3)(b)
108
1,050
ug/kg
230 J-
620
1200
1200
17
4.2 U
48
380
510
430
210
Benzo(a)pyrene(a)(b)
150
1,450
ug/kg
75
480
790
490
8
4.2 U
53
360
450
350
180
Benzo(b)fluoranthene(a)(b)
10,400
NSL
ug/kg
260
550
1200
1000
16
1.6 J
90
420
590
440
200
Benzo(e)pyrene(b)
150
1,450
ug/kg
47
400
870
730
11
1.2 J
62
280
380
280
150
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene(a)(b)
170
NSL
ug/kg
5.2 J-
310
670
560
10
4.2 U
50
69 J
110
59 J
42
Benzo(k)fluoranthene(a)(b)
240
NSL
ug/kg
200
460
1000
880
13
0.69 J
70
400
390
380
190
CI Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
120 J
270 J
770 J
510 J
9 J
4.2 U
30 J
280 J
510 J
680 J
300 J
C1 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
46 U
120 U
270 U
210 U
4.3 U
4.2 U
12 U
82 J
140 J
120 J
51 J
C l-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
270 J
640 J
1700 J
1500 J
22 J
4.2 U
56 J
650 J
1000 J
1000 J
510 J
C 1-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
46 U
120 U
270 U
210 U
4.3 U
4.2 U
12 U
79 U
110U
77 U
38 U
C 1-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
160 J
520 J
1500 J
1200 J
17 J
5.2 J
31 J
550 J
1000 J
980 J
370 J
C2 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
64 J
180 J
660 J
310 J
5.1 J
4.2 U
17 J
170 J
370 J
650 J
240 J
C2 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
46 U
160 J
600 J
210 U
4.3 U
4.2 U
12 U
280 J
560 J
390 J
150 J
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
170 J
470 J
1300 J
860 J
13 J
4.4 J
35 J
440 J
830 J
1000 J
450 J
C2-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
77 J
200 J
740 J
780 J
11 J
4.9 J
15 J
220 J
380 J
370 J
180 J
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
160 J
510 J
2300 J
920 J
18 J
8.3 J
31 J
1100 J
2300 J
2200 J
690 J
C3 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
46 U
120 U
480 J
210 U
4.3 U
4.2 U
12 U
100 J
220 J
360 J
160 J
C3 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
74 J
290 J
1100 J
340 J
6 J
4.2 U
19 J
430 J
1000 J
630 J
240 J
C 3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene s
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
73 J
220 J
1000 J
360 J
6.1 J
4.2 U
16 J
350 J
790 J
930 J
400 J
C3-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
130 J
360 J
1700 J
650 J
14 J
11 J
27 J
820 J
1200 J
980 J
400 J
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
120 J
450 J
2600 J
640 J
16 J
7 J
23 J
1100 J
2500 J
2600 J
810 J
C4 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
46 U
120 U
270 U
210 U
4.3 U
4.2 U
12 U
79 U
110U
170 J
68 J
C4-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
140 J
460 J
2100 J
450 J
13 J
16 J
36 J
1300 J
2100 J
1500 J
530 J
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
94 J
360 J
2200 J
500 J
13 J
5.3 J
15 J
800 J
1900 J
2200 J
710 J
u (a)(b)
Chrysene
166
1,290
ug/kg
260 J-
670
1500
1300
19
2.5 J
87
520
710
590
260
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene(a)(b)
33
NSL
ug/kg
57
110 J
250 J
210
3.1 J
4.2 U
14
78 J
100 J
82
38
Fluoranthene(a)(b)
423
2,230
ug/kg
530
1500
3000
3200
45
2.2 J
180
1100
1400
1100
480
Fluorene(a)(b)
77
536
ug/kg
35 J
72 J
190 J
460
3.6 J
0.77 J
5.3 J
66 J
89 J
83
44
Indeno( l,2,3-cd)pyrene(a)(b)
200
NSL
ug/kg
77 J-
290
620
540
9.1
4.2 U
51
220
270
210
110
Naphthalene(a)(b)
176
561
ug/kg
14 J
28 J
80 J
120 J
0.84 J
0.78 J
3 J
14 J
26 J
22 J
12 J
Perylene(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
8 J
150
290
210
18
23
18
87
110
83
42
Phenanthrene(a)(b)
204
1,170
ug/kg
260
960
1900
3100
34
2.2 J
54
550
700
570
280
Pyrene(a)(b)
195
1,520
ug/kg
250 J-
1200
2400
2600
32
1.9 J
100
850
1100
790
410
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
1,610
22,800
ug/kg
2351.2
7546
15424
16470
222.77
30.26
819.9
5183
6675
5329
2567
Total PAH34 ND=1/2RL
1,610
22,800
ug/kg
3916.2
12704
35351
25656
405.89
130.24
1226.8
13489
22420
20527.5
8169
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = Microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
RL = Reporting limit
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
B = Compound was found in the blank and sample
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value
is an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
*TEC value based on USEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value
(EPA 2003)
(a) Analytes inlcuded in Total 17 PAH calculations
(b) Analytes inlcuded in Total 34 PAH calculations
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 7 of 14
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
62561.36
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS, HT
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
HT18-13
HT18-13
HT18-13
HT18-14
HT18-14
HT18-14
HT18-15
HT18-15
HT18-15
HT18-15
HT18-15
HT18-13-6090
HT18-13-6090-FD
HT18-13-9010
HT18-14-SURF
HT18-14-0010
HT18-14-1020
HT 18-15-SURF
HT18-15-0005
HT18-15-0530
HT18-15-3050
HT18-15-3050-FD
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/24/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
6.3-8.8
6.3-8.8
8.8-10
0-0.5
0-1.3
1.3-1.9
0-0.5
0-0.5
0.5-3
3-5
3-5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
5 J
5.9 J
3.5 J
3.9 J
560 J
20 J
61 J
1.1 J-
4.1
3.3 J
3.5 J
2-Methylnaphthalene(a)
20.2
NSL
ug/kg
7.6 J
9.5 J
3 J
5.1 J
840 J
88 J
66 J
1.2 J-
5.2
3.8 J
4.1
Acenaphthene(a)(b)
6.71
NSL
ug/kg
18
21 J
14 J
8.4 J
680 J
100
180
2.8 J-
3.8 U
3.9 U
3.9 U
Acenaphthylene(a)(b)
5.87
NSL
ug/kg
3.4 J
4.7 J
3.1 J
5.4 J
840 U
12 J
120 U
0.51 J-
3.8 U
3.9 U
3.9 U
Anthracene(a)(b)
57.2
845
ug/kg
21
29
31
27
1100
120
310
3.3 J-
3.8 U
3.9 U
3.9 U
Benzo(a)anthracene(3)(b)
108
1,050
ug/kg
61
86
77
170
2800
360
480
7.2 J-
0.51 J
0.6 J
0.65 J
Benzo(a)pyrene(a)(b)
150
1,450
ug/kg
36
62
65
100
2200
240
250
4.3 J-
0.62 J
0.55 J
0.63 J
Benzo(b)fluoranthene(a)(b)
10,400
NSL
ug/kg
59
88
68
180
2000
250
320
7.7 J-
1.6 J
1.5 J
1.6 J
Benzo(e)pyrene(b)
150
1,450
ug/kg
44
61
42
120
1600
210
190
6.2 J-
2 J
2 J
2.1 J
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene(a)(b)
170
NSL
ug/kg
26
36
10 J
83
1200
170
48 J
5.9 J-
3.3 J
2.9 J
3.2 J
Benzo(k)fluoranthene(a)(b)
240
NSL
ug/kg
49
67
63
150
2600
300
320
7.1 J-
1.1 J
1.1 J
0.92 J
CI Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
110 J
160 J
35 J
74 J
1600 J
220 J
180 J
9.2 J-
4.5 J
4.3 J
4.9 J
C1 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
22 J
28 J
20 U
25 U
840 U
88 U
120 U
4 J-
3.8 J
3.9 U
4 J
C l-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
140 J
190 J
96 J
160 J
4500 J
650 J
450 J
16 J-
7.2 J
7 J
8 J
C 1-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
15 U
23 U
20 U
25 U
890 J
88 U
120 U
3.8 UI
6.4 J
4.8 J
5.2 J
C 1-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
160 J
210 J
66 J
75 J
2900 J
430 J
490 J
16 J-
15 J
16 J
16 J
C2 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
89 J
150 J
20 U
31 J
840 U
100 J
120 U
7.7 J-
4.7 J
4.8 J
4.9 J
C2 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
60 J
79 J
20 U
25 U
840 U
90 J
120 U
8.6 J-
5.7 J
6 J
6.8 J
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
150 J
200 J
42 J
81 J
2300 J
310 J
210 J
13 J-
9.8 J
9.9 J
11 J
C2-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
79 J
99 J
20 J
25 U
2100 J
130 J
230 J
9.1 J-
21 J
19 J
20 J
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
300 J
410 J
48 J
50 J
2800 J
390 J
220 J
25 J-
21 J
22 J
22 J
C3 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
61 J
91 J
20 U
25 U
840 U
88 U
120 U
4.1 J-
3.8 U
3.9 U
3.9 U
C3 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
120 J
160 J
20 U
25 U
980 J
120 J
120 U
12 J-
8.7 J
9 J
10 J
C 3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene s
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
130 J
150 J
20 U
36 J
1100 J
150 J
120 U
9.4 J-
9.1 J
8.8 J
9.4 J
C3-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
170 J
210 J
30 J
26 J
2400 J
240 J
160 J
25 J-
41 J
41 J
43 J
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
350 J
490 J
27 J
29 J
2200 J
310 J
120 U
25 J-
18 J
19 J
20 J
C4 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
22 J
30 J
20 U
25 U
840 U
88 U
120 U
3.8 UI
3.8 U
3.9 U
3.9 U
C4-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
200 J
260 J
35 J
26 J
2200 J
270 J
120 U
43 J-
62 J
65 J
68 J
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
310 J
430 J
20 U
25 U
1500 J
230 J
120 U
20 J-
13 J
13 J
14 J
u (a)(b)
Chrysene
166
1,290
ug/kg
83
120
79
190
3200
400
460
12 J-
3.4 J
3.6 J
3.9
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene(a)(b)
33
NSL
ug/kg
9.5 J
13 J
14 J
35
540 J
68 J
64 J
1.5 J-
3.8 U
3.9 U
3.9 U
Fluoranthene(a)(b)
423
2,230
ug/kg
200
280
200
400
960
1400
27 J-
1.5 J
1.1 J
1.3 J
Fluorene(a)(b)
77
536
ug/kg
25
30
17 J
16 J
790 J
65 J
240
2.4 J-
1.2 J
1.1 J
1.1 J
Indeno( l,2,3-cd)pyrene(a)(b)
200
NSL
ug/kg
27
38
38
93
1200
170
170
4.2 J-
0.58 J
0.49 J
0.48 J
Naphthalene(a)(b)
176
561
ug/kg
4.8 J
6.1 J
3.9 J
7.9 J
1000
88 J
86 J
0.87 J-
5.3
3.2 J
3.7 J
Perylene(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
11 J
17 J
29
37
570 J
93
62 J
6.2 J-
2.4 J
2.4 J
2.6 J
Phenanthrene(a)(b)
204
1,170
ug/kg
160
190
130
150
760
1600
11 J-
5.4
5
5.3
Pyrene(a)(b)
195
1,520
ug/kg
130
180
150
280
840
910
19 J-
2.5 J
2.4 J
2.7 J
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
1,610
22,800
ug/kg
920.3
1260.3
966
1900.8
38970
4991
6964
117.98
39.81
35.14
37.38
Total PAH34 ND=1/2RL
1,610
22,800
ug/kg
3168.2
4337.3
1471
2623.7
66470
8562
9480
357.68
274.81
272.49
288.68
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = Microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
RL = Reporting limit
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
B = Compound was found in the blank and sample
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value
is an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
*TEC value based on USEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value
(EPA 2003)
(a) Analytes inlcuded in Total 17 PAH calculations
(b) Analytes inlcuded in Total 34 PAH calculations
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 8 of 14
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
62561.36
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS, HT
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
HT18-16
HT18-17
HT18-17
HT18-17
HT18-17
HT18-18
HT18-18
HT18-18
HT18-18
HT18-18
HT18-19
HT18-16-SURF
HT18-17-SURF
HT18-17-0010
HT18-17-1030
HT18-17-3050
HT18-18-SURF
HT18-18-0020
HT18-18-2030
HT18-18-3035
HT18-18-3555
HT18-19-SURF
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/24/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/24/2018
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-4.7
0-0.5
0-1.9
1.9-2.8
2.8-3.6
3.6-5.4
0-0.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
4.7 J
1.5 J
5.9
5
5.3
10 J
490 J
7.2
3.8 J
5.2
14 J
2-Methylnaphthalene(a)
20.2
NSL
ug/kg
5.6 J
1.7 J
6.6
5.5
5.7
9.9 J
340 J
7.7
4.1 J
6
180 U
Acenaphthene(a)(b)
6.71
NSL
ug/kg
8.6 J
5.1 J
3.9
3.9 U
3.8 U
32 J
1100 J
13
13
4 U
85 J
Acenaphthylene(a)(b)
5.87
NSL
ug/kg
4.4 J
9.4 U
0.44 J
3.9 U
3.8 U
81 U
140 J
3.9
2.6 J
4 U
130 J
Anthracene(a)(b)
57.2
845
ug/kg
17 J
5.7 J
9.3
3.9 U
3.8 U
73 J
1800
17
19
4 U
190
Benzo(a)anthracene(3)(b)
108
1,050
ug/kg
100
29
19
0.82 J
0.97 J
320
11
46
0.82 J
1200
Benzo(a)pyrene(a)(b)
150
1,450
ug/kg
100
11
16
0.62 J
1.2 J
270
8.4
36
1.1 J
1000
Benzo(b)fluoranthene(a)(b)
10,400
NSL
ug/kg
150
37
16
2.2 J
2.7 J
350
6400
7.1
37
2.4 J
1200
Benzo(e)pyrene(b)
150
1,450
ug/kg
110
25
12
2.5 J
3.4 J
250
4300
7
27
3.1 J
970
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene(a)(b)
170
NSL
ug/kg
48
12
12
4
4.9
150
3100
11
20
4.8
580
Benzo(k)fluoranthene(a)(b)
240
NSL
ug/kg
130
35
14
1.1 J
1.2 J
330
5100
6.4
30
1.4 J
1200
CI Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
54 J
15 J
14 J
5.8 J
6.8 J
150 J
3300 J
13 J
30 J
6.6 J
560 J
C1 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
27 U
9.4 U
8.8 J
5 J
6.4 J
81 U
1100 J
14 J
12 J
5.3 J
180 U
C l-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
110 J
28 J
35 J
9.6 J
13 J
300 J
10000 J
28 J
71 J
11 J
870 J
C 1-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
27 U
9.4 U
8.6 J
7.2 J
7.6 J
81 U
1100U
10 J
9.4 U
7.6 J
180 U
C 1-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
56 J
18 J
37 J
20 J
24 J
170 J
8100 J
65 J
67 J
22 J
380 J
C2 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
36 J
9.4 U
8.5 J
6.1 J
7.5 J
81 U
2300 J
11 J
15 J
7 J
380 J
C2 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
27 U
9.4 U
15 J
7.8 J
9.9 J
81 U
2800 J
19 J
20 J
9.1 J
180 U
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
84 J
19 J
24 J
13 J
17 J
170 J
5400 J
21 J
39 J
14 J
560 J
C2-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
37 J
9.4 U
32 J
26 J
28 J
81 U
4600 J
60 J
34 J
30 J
180 U
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
52 J
14 J
43 J
27 J
32 J
120 J
11000 J
62 J
74 J
30 J
260 J
C3 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
27 U
9.4 U
5.4 J
4.1 J
5.5 J
81 U
1100 J
7.1 J
9.4 U
4.9 J
250 J
C3 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
49 J
11 J
20 J
12 J
15 J
81 U
4100 J
23 J
26 J
13 J
180 U
C 3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene s
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
41 J
9.4 U
17 J
11 J
14 J
81 J
3700 J
18 J
24 J
13 J
360 J
C3-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
70 J
12 J
67 J
54 J
62 J
81 U
11000 J
120 J
83 J
61 J
180 U
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
41 J
9.9 J
35 J
23 J
28 J
81 U
8900 J
45 J
55 J
26 J
180 U
C4 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
27 U
9.4 U
3.9 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
81 U
1100U
3.9 U
9.4 U
4 U
180 U
C4-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
81 J
15 J
100 J
83 J
100 J
84 J
9000 J
170 J
100 J
87 J
180 U
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
28 J
9.4 U
25 J
16 J
20 J
81 U
6000 J
31 J
37 J
18 J
180 U
u (a)(b)
Chrysene
166
1,290
ug/kg
170
40
23
4.7
5.6
400
15
53
5.1
1300
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene(a)(b)
33
NSL
ug/kg
32
8.2 J
3.7 J
0.49 J
0.62 J
79 J
1300
1.8 J
7.8 J
0.6 J
260
Fluoranthene(a)(b)
423
2,230
ug/kg
370
100
57
1.6 J
2 J
950
32
110
2.3 J
2700
Fluorene(a)(b)
77
536
ug/kg
11 J
5.1 J
4.5
1.5 J
2 J
41 J
1100
12
12
1.7 J
100 J
Indeno( l,2,3-cd)pyrene(a)(b)
200
NSL
ug/kg
97
24
8.6
0.63 J
0.81 J
220
3400
4.1
20
0.81 J
990
Naphthalene(a)(b)
176
561
ug/kg
4.3 J
1.4 J
5.2
4.4
5.3
13 J
240 J
7.8
4.6 J
4.9
180 U
Perylene(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
25 J
6.1 J
7.6
2.9 J
3.5 J
85
1400
4.5
14
3.5 J
330
Phenanthrene(a)(b)
204
1,170
ug/kg
160
57
30
6.9
8.9
500
58
81
8.1
1100
Pyrene(a)(b)
195
1,520
ug/kg
230
64
47
3.3 J
4.3
560
31
95
3.8 J
1800
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
1,610
22,800
ug/kg
1637.9
440.9
276.24
43.61
51.9
4338.4
247.2
591.1
49.83
14015
Total PAH34 ND=1/2RL
1,610
22,800
ug/kg
2448.8
630.8
745.49
352.06
420.7
5933
931.05
1266.1
390.93
18825
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = Microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
RL = Reporting limit
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
B = Compound was found in the blank and sample
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value
is an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
*TEC value based on USEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value
(EPA 2003)
(a) Analytes inlcuded in Total 17 PAH calculations
(b) Analytes inlcuded in Total 34 PAH calculations
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 9 of 14
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS, HT
Analyte
1 -Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
(a)
Acenaphthene
(a)(b)
Acenaphthylene
(a)(b)
Anthracene
(a)(b)
Benzo(a)anthracene
(a)(b)
Benzo(a)pyrene
(a)(b)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
(a)(b)
Benzo(e)pyrene
(b)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene'
(a)(b)
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
(a)(b)
CI Chrysenes'
(b)
C1 Fluorenes
(b)
C 1-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
(b)
CI-Naphthalenes'
(b)
C 1-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
(b)
C2 Chrysenes1
(b)
C2 Fluorenes
(b)
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
C2-Naphthalenes'
(b)
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
(b)
C3 Chrysenes1
(b)
C3 Fluorenes
(b)
C 3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene s
C3-Naphthalenes'
(b)
C 3-Phenanthrene s/Anthracenes
(b)
C4 Chrysenes1
(b)
C4-Naphthalenes'
(b)
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
(b)
Chrysene
(a)(b)
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
(a)(b)
Fluoranthene
(a)(b)
Fluorene
(a)(b)
Indeno( l,2,3-cd)pyrene
(a)(b)
Naphthalene1
(a)(b)
Perylene
(b)
Phenanthrene
(a)(b)
Pyrene'
(a)(b)
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
Total PAH34 ND=1/2RL
TEC
NSL
20.2
6.71
5.87
57.2
108
150
10,400
150
170
240
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
166
33
423
77
200
176
NSL
204
195
1.610
1.610
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
PEC
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
845
1.050
1,450
NSL
1,450
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
1,290
NSL
2.230
536
NSL
561
NSL
1,170
1.520
22.800
22.800
Unit
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
HT18-19
HT18-19-0010
10/25/2018
0-1
HT18-19
HT18-19-1020
10/25/2018
1-2.3
HT18-19
HT18-19-2030
10/25/2018
2.3-2.8
HT18-20
HT18-20-SURF
10/24/2018
0-0.5
HT 18-20
HT 18-20-0010
10/25/2018
0-0.£
HT 18-20
HT18-20-1020
10/25/2018
0.8-1.8
HT 18-20
HT18-20-2030
10/25/2018
1.8-2.8
HT18-20
HT18-20-2030-FD
10/25/2018
1.8-2.8
260 J
410 J
2100 J
2100 U
2100
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
820 U
820 U
820 J
820 U
1300
1.6 J
1.9 J
9.7 J
9.7 U
14
ug/kg
43
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
3800
6100
5100 J
2100 U
12000 J
2100 U
11000 J
3200 J
3800 J
6800 J
5700 J
15000 J
2100 U
5300 J
5100 J
16000 J
13000 J
2100 U
15000 J
7700 J
1600
2600
1300 J
820 U
3800 J
820 U
2300 J
820 U
820 U
1400 J
820 U
1700 J
820 U
820 U
820 U
930 J
1100 J
820 U
830 J
820 U
ug/kg
ug/kg
580 J
35
37
28
27
35
22 J
9.7 U
59 J
9.7 U
48 J
14 J
12 J
29 J
19 J
53 J
9.7 U
18 J
18 J
44 J
42 J
9.7 U
44 J
33 J
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
-'g/kg
49
8.8 J
110
6.5 J
24
2.1 J
21
71
89
567.85
1042.35
8.8 J
10 J
44 J
8 J
86
330
270
340
220
71
310
120 J
68 U
280 J
68 U
170 J
68 U
68 U
150 J
68 U
96 J
68 U
68 U
68 U
68 U
68 U
68 U
68 U
68 U
390
74
950
49 J
200
18 J
68
540
630
4320
5672
14 J
18 J
82 J
14 J
100
400
260
400
280
210
350
170 J
82 U
480 J
82 U
250 J
82 U
82 U
230 J
82 U
210 J
82 U
85 J
97 J
110 J
130 J
82 U
100 J
82 U
460
74 J
1100
62 J
210
25 J
94
600
840
5205
7424
1.8 J
2.6 J
13
4 U
5.3
8.6
6.7
6.4
4.4
3.5 J
7.1
4.5 J
4 U
11 J
4 U
9.5 J
4 U
4 U
6.1 J
6.7 J
5.8 J
4 U
4 U
4 U
5.4 J
4 U
4 U
4 U
4 U
8.9
1.4 J
20
5.7
3.6 J
5.3
14
27
15
142.1
220.8
1.5 J
1.9 J
17
1.4 J
18
38
30
28
22
18
30
18 J
8.6 J
56 J
8.1 U
46 J
8.1 U
8.1 U
22 J
13 J
31 J
8.1 U
8.1 U
9.7 J
21 J
16 J
8.1 U
22 J
11 J
40
6.2 J
100
4.3 J
18
2.7 J
35
88
85
526.5
848.5
2.3 J
2.6 J
22
2.4 J
34
67
50
45
35
29
52
31 J
16 U
94 J
16 U
70 J
16 U
16 U
37 J
18 J
45 J
16 U
16 U
16 U
28 J
24 J
16 U
26 J
20 J
68
11 J
170
8.5 J
32
3.7 J
35
130
140
HT18-21
HT18-21-SURF
10/24/2018
0-0.5
867.2
1346.6
10 J
16 J
33 J
48 U
110
200
140
160
160
35 J
120
160 J
48 U
360 J
48 U
190 J
220 J
48 U
440 J
73 J
130 J
200 J
48 U
290 J
78 J
140 J
89 J
51 J
130 J
220
38 J
580
48
97
7.8 J
33 J
510
400
2738.8
4832.8
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
HT18-21
HT18-21-0015
10/25/2018
0-1.7
8.1 J
14 J
15 J
3.9 J
18
73
64
80
150
86
68
180 J
15 U
310 J
15 J
110 J
330 J
39 J
550 J
63 J
220 J
260 J
77 J
480 J
78 J
350 J
130 J
89 J
340 J
130
25
150
17
58
9.8 J
21
120
150
1081.7
3837.2
HT 18-23
HT18-23-SURF
10/23/2018
0-0.5
6.6 J
6.4 J
10 J
54 U
22 J
150
170
240
180
140
220
69 J
54 U
160 J
54 U
78 J
54 U
54 U
91 J
54 U
62 J
54 U
54 U
54 U
54 U
54 U
54 U
62 J
54 U
260
51 J
570
17 J
160
54 U
53 J
210
340
2620.4
3575
62561.36
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = Microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
RL = Reporting limit
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
B = Compound was found in the blank and sample
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value
is an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
*TEC value based on USEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value
(EPA 2003)
(a) Analytes inlcuded in Total 17 PAH calculations
(b) Analytes inlcuded in Total 34 PAH calculations
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 10 of 14
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
62561.36
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS, HT
Location ID:
HT 18-23
HT18-23
HT18-23
HT18-23
HT 18-23
HT 18-24
HT 18-24
HT 18-24
HT 18-24
HT 18-24
HT 18-24
Sample Name:
HT18-23-0010
HT18-23-1030
HT18-23-3050
HT18-23-5070
HT 18-23-7010
HT18-24-SURF
HT18-24-0010
HT18-24-1025
HT18-24-2550
HT18-24-5065
HT18-24-5065-FD
Sample Date:
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/23/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-1
1-3
3-5
5-7
7-9.2
0-0.5
0-1
1-2.7
2.7-5
5-6.6
5-6.6
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
1.8 J
4.1 U
0.4 J
0.65 J
1.9 J
140 U
69 U
0.47 J
0.59 J
0.45 J
0.63 J
2-Methylnaphthalene(a)
20.2
NSL
ug/kg
2 J
4.1 U
4.3 U
0.52 J
1.1 J
140 U
69 U
4.2 U
4.5 U
4.3 U
4.1 U
Acenaphthene(a)(b)
6.71
NSL
ug/kg
3.6 J
4.1 U
4.3 U
0.39 J
0.44 J
56 J
43 J
4.2 U
4.5 U
4.3 U
4.1 U
Acenaphthylene(a)(b)
5.87
NSL
ug/kg
1.5 J
4.1 U
4.3 U
4.4 U
4.5 U
140 U
69 U
4.2 U
4.5 U
4.3 U
4.1 U
Anthracene(a)(b)
57.2
845
ug/kg
7 J
4.1 U
4.3 U
4.4 U
4.5 U
150
77
4.2 U
4.5 U
4.3 U
4.1 U
Benzo(a)anthracene(3)(b)
108
1,050
ug/kg
46
4.1 U
4.3 U
4.4 U
0.81 J
600
340
0.57 J
0.85 J
4.3 U
4.1 U
Benzo(a)pyrene(a)(b)
150
1,450
ug/kg
39
4.1 U
4.3 U
4.4 U
0.93 J
450
160
4.2 U
0.5 J
4.3 U
4.1 U
Benzo(b)fluoranthene(a)(b)
10,400
NSL
ug/kg
67
0.81 J
1 J
1.6 J
3.5 J
570
350
1.3 J
1.6 J
0.74 J
1.2 J
Benzo(e)pyrene(b)
150
1,450
ug/kg
43
0.51 J
0.74 J
1.2 J
3 J
390
230
0.81 J
1.4 J
0.52 J
0.62 J
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene(a)(b)
170
NSL
ug/kg
37
0.61 J
0.82 J
1.3 J
4.5 U
270
180
1.4 J
0.87 J
4.3 U
4.1 U
Benzo(k)fluoranthene(a)(b)
240
NSL
ug/kg
51
4.1 U
4.3 U
4.4 U
1 J
550
280
0.84 J
0.92 J
4.3 U
0.73 J
CI Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
20 J
4.1 U
4.3 U
4.4 U
5.8 J
180 J
110 J
4.2 U
4.5 U
4.3 U
4.1 U
C1 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
11 U
4.1 U
4.3 U
4.4 U
4.5 U
140 U
69 U
4.2 U
4.5 U
4.3 U
4.1 U
C l-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
60 J
4.1 U
4.3 U
4.4 U
9.4 J
470 J
350 J
4.2 U
4.5 U
4.3 U
4.1 U
C 1-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
11 U
4.1 U
4.3 U
4.4 U
4.5 U
140 U
69 U
4.2 U
4.5 U
4.3 U
4.1 U
C 1-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
33 J
4.1 U
4.3 U
4.8 J
12 J
230 J
200 J
4.2 U
4.5 J
4.3 U
4.1 U
C2 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
13 J
4.1 U
4.3 U
4.4 U
4.5 U
140 U
69 U
4.2 U
4.5 U
4.3 U
4.1 U
C2 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
12 J
4.1 U
4.3 U
4.4 U
5.3 J
140 U
69 U
4.2 U
4.5 U
4.3 U
4.1 U
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
36 J
4.1 U
4.3 U
4.4 U
9.7 J
190 J
110 J
4.2 U
4.5 U
4.3 U
4.1 U
C2-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
12 J
4.1 U
4.3 U
4.4 U
8.4 J
140 U
69 U
4.2 U
4.5 U
4.3 U
4.1 U
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
58 J
4.1 U
4.3 U
7.6 J
21 J
140 U
110 J
7.2 J
7 J
5.4 J
7.3 J
C3 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
11 U
4.1 U
4.3 U
4.4 U
4.5 U
140 U
69 U
4.2 U
4.5 U
4.3 U
4.1 U
C3 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
22 J
4.1 U
4.3 U
4.4 U
6.6 J
140 U
69 U
4.2 U
4.5 U
4.3 U
4.1 U
C 3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene s
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
19 J
4.1 U
4.3 U
4.4 U
7.6 J
140 U
69 U
4.2 U
4.5 U
4.3 U
4.1 U
C3-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
27 J
4.1 U
4.3 U
7.6 J
21 J
140 U
69 U
7.7 J
8.8 J
6.3 J
8.6 J
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
40 J
4.1 U
4.3 U
6.4 J
16 J
140 U
69 U
4.9 J
5.1 J
4.3 U
5.5 J
C4 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
11 U
4.1 U
4.3 U
4.4 U
4.5 U
140 U
69 U
4.2 U
4.5 U
4.3 U
4.1 U
C4-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
40 J
4.1 J
7.2 J
13 J
37 J
140 U
69 U
17 J
16 J
13 J
18 J
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
26 J
4.1 U
4.3 U
4.4 U
11 J
140 U
69 U
4.2 U
4.5 U
4.3 U
4.4 J
u (a)(b)
Chrysene
166
1,290
ug/kg
64
0.84 J
1.4 J
2.3 J
5.4
740
420
1.9 J
2.5 J
1.4 J
1.9 J
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene(a)(b)
33
NSL
ug/kg
12
4.1 U
4.3 U
4.4 U
4.5 U
120 J
73
4.2 U
4.5 U
4.3 U
4.1 U
Fluoranthene(a)(b)
423
2,230
ug/kg
130
0.58 J
1 J
1.2 J
3.2 J
2200
1100
4.2 U
4.5 U
4.3 U
4.1 U
Fluorene(a)(b)
77
536
ug/kg
3.8 J
4.1 U
4.3 U
0.68 J
1.8 J
85 J
34 J
0.69 J
0.84 J
0.46 J
0.58 J
Indeno( l,2,3-cd)pyrene(a)(b)
200
NSL
ug/kg
35
4.1 U
4.3 U
4.4 U
1 J
340
200
0.58 J
0.73 J
4.3 U
4.1 U
Naphthalene(a)(b)
176
561
ug/kg
1.9 J
4.1 U
0.58 J
0.78 J
0.74 J
140 U
69 U
4.2 U
4.5 U
4.3 U
4.1 U
Perylene(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
19
2.2 J
3.6 J
4.7
9.9
130 J
64 J
1.7 J
3.2 J
1.3 J
1.3 J
Phenanthrene(a)(b)
204
1,170
ug/kg
57
0.5 J
1.5 J
2.2 J
3.6 J
1200
580
4.2 U
4.5 U
4.3 U
4.1 U
Pyrene(a)(b)
195
1,520
ug/kg
110
0.67 J
1.2 J
1.8 J
4.3 J
1200
660
4.2 U
4.5 U
4.3 U
4.1 U
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
1,610
22,800
ug/kg
667.8
26.56
29
28.17
36.82
8741
4600.5
28.28
29.06
32.7
31.06
Total PAH34 ND=1/2RL
1,610
22,800
ug/kg
1112.8
62.07
70.64
97.15
213.37
10981
6044
90.69
97.56
85.02
97.28
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = Microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
RL = Reporting limit
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
B = Compound was found in the blank and sample
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value
is an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
*TEC value based on USEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value
(EPA 2003)
(a) Analytes inlcuded in Total 17 PAH calculations
(b) Analytes inlcuded in Total 34 PAH calculations
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 11 of 14
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS, HT
Analyte
1 -Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
(a)
Acenaphthene
(a)(b)
Acenaphthylene
(a)(b)
Anthracene'
(a)(b)
Benzo(a)anthracene
(a)(b)
Benzo(a)pyrene'
(a)(b)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
(a)(b)
Benzo(e)pyrene'
(b)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
(a)(b)
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
(a)(b)
CI Chrysenes
(b)
CI Fluorenes'
(b)
C1 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
(b)
CI-Naphthalenes
(b)
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
(b)
C2 Chrysenes
(b)
C2 Fluorenes'
(b)
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
C2-Naphthalenes
(b)
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
(b)
C3 Chrysenes
(b)
C3 Fluorenes'
(b)
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
C3-Naphthalenes
(b)
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
(b)
C4 Chrysenes
(b)
C4-Naphthalenes
(b)
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
(b)
Chrysene
(a)(b)
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
(a)(b)
Fluoranthene
(a)(b)
Fluorene
(a)(b)
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
(a)(b)
Naphthalene
(a)(b)
Perylene
(b)
Phenanthrene
(a)(b)
Pyrene
(a)(b)
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
Total PAH34 ND=1/2RL
TEC
NSL
20.2
6.71
5.87
57.2
108
150
10,400
150
170
240
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
166
33
423
77
200
176
NSL
204
195
1.610
1.610
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
PEC
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
845
1.050
1,450
NSL
1,450
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
1,290
NSL
2.230
536
NSL
561
NSL
1,170
1.520
22.800
22.800
Unit
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
¦ig/kg
HT 18-24
HT18-24-6575
10/24/2018
6.6-7.8
HT 18-25
HT18-25-SURF
10/23/2018
0-0.5
HT 18-25
HT18-25-0010
10/24/2018
0-1
HT 18-25
HT18-25-1030
10/24/2018
1-3
HT18-25
HT18-25-3040
10/24/2018
3-4.2
HT18-25
HT18-25-4070
10/24/2018
4.2-7
HT18-25
HT18-25-7010
10/24/2018
7-9.5
HT 18-26
HT18-26-SURF
10/23/2018
0-0.5
HT 18-26
HT18-26-0010
10/24/2018
0-1
HT 18-26
HT18-26-1030
10/24/2018
1-3
4.3
4.5
0.35 J
3.9 U
0.52 J
0.85 J
1.4 J
2.7 J
3.6 J
4.4
0.77 J
7.5 J
5.6 J
12 J
6 J
22 J
7.6 J
11 J
16 J
26 J
31 J
6.1 J
14 J
11 J
59 J
28 J
3.9 U
95 J
20 J
5.7
0.71 J
2.4 J
1.6 J
0.86 J
2.2 J
3.8 J
7.3
4.3
42.51
398.16
5.2 J
5.9 J
25 J
50 U
57
260
240
320
210
150
250
100 J
50 U
230 J
50 U
110 J
50 U
50 U
110 J
50 U
58 J
50 U
50 U
50 U
50 U
50 U
50 U
50 U
50 U
350
66
770
31 J
190
9 J
66
350
460
3558.9
4627
55 J
75 J
130 J
380 U
270 J
1600
1000
1600
790
91 J
1300
1200 J
380 U
2100 J
380 U
1800 J
600 J
590 J
1500 J
710 J
3100 J
380 U
1200 J
1000 J
1800 J
3300 J
380 U
2200 J
2400 J
2100
330 J
4400
180 J
820
52 J
160 J
1900
2800
18838
230 J
140 J
460 J
94 J
790
2800
2100
2500
1800
0.7 J
0.45 J
17
4.5 U
4.1 J
2 J
1100
2100
2700 J
620 J
4100 J
610 U
4600 J
1700 J
2000 J
3000 J
2700 J
7400 J
1100 J
3400 J
2000 J
8300 J
7000 J
610 U
8600 J
4400 J
4200
6800
3900 J
2600 U
8800 J
2600 U
5600 J
2600 U
2600 U
3500 J
2600 U
4600 J
2600 U
2600 U
2600 U
2600 U
3800 J
2600 U
2600 U
3000 J
1.2 J
2.9 J
2.4 J
15
1.9 J
4.5 U
4.5 U
4.6 J
4.5 U
7.9 J
4.5 U
4.5 U
4.5 U
6.1 J
9.5 J
4.5 U
4.5 U
4.5 U
11 J
6.3 J
4.5 U
19 J
4.7 J
41473
3.9 J
0.74 J
11
3.6 J
1.6 J
4.5 U
4.2 J
43
119.89
213.14
0.99 J
0.62 J
0.39 J
4.3 U
4.3 U
0.85 J
0.91 J
2.2 J
1.8 J
4.3 U
0.9 J
4.3 U
4.3 U
6 J
4.3 U
7.7 J
4.3 U
4.3 U
5.7 J
4.7 J
17 J
4.3 U
4.3 U
4.5 J
12 J
9.9 J
4.3 U
22 J
7.1 J
3.6 J
4.3 U
3.2 J
1.3 J
0.68 J
0.56 J
8.7
3.6 J
3.6 J
31.01
144.49
7 J
8.2 J
23 J
65 U
45 J
300
240
410
250
73
320
140 J
65 U
270 J
65 U
140 J
65 U
65 U
150 J
65 U
140 J
65 U
85 J
66 J
77 J
120 J
65 U
89 J
84 J
430
84
840
28 J
240
12 J
62 J
320
510
3915.7
5592
200 U
200 U
85 J
200 U
320
890
690
810
560
490
680
340 J
200 U
1000 J
200 U
550 J
200 U
200 U
360 J
200 U
420 J
200 U
200 U
200 U
200 U
280 J
200 U
200 U
200 U
970
170 J
2400
47 J
460
200 U
210
1400
2000
11712
16072
0.83 J
0.79 J
1.2 J
4 U
2.8 J
11
9.8
11
8.2
8.5
10
7.3 J
4 U
15 J
4 U
9.3 J
4.9 J
4 U
8.8 J
4 U
12 J
4 U
4.2 J
6 J
9.7 J
16 J
4 U
15 J
9.3 J
14
2.1 J
27
0.98 J
6.7
1.1 J
9.9
13
21
142.97
274.98
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
HT18-26
HT18-26-3050
10/24/2018
3-5
1.2 J
0.92 J
0.56 J
4.3 U
4.3 U
1.1 J
0.81 J
2.5 J
2.2 J
2.1 J
4.3 U
4.3 U
4.3 U
6.3 J
4.3 U
5.4 J
4.3 U
4.3 U
5.8 J
4.7 J
9.1 J
4.3 U
4.3 U
4.6 J
10 J
10 J
4.3 U
17 J
6.6 J
3.8 J
4.3 U
3.3 J
0.53 J
0.71 J
1.3 J
7.9
2.9 J
3.5 J
32.63
128.11
HT18-26
HT18-26-3050-FD
10/24/2018
3-5
1.1 J
0.9 J
0.46 J
4.2 U
4.2 U
0.94 J
0.58 J
2.6 J
1.7 J
2.6 J
4.2 U
4.2 U
4.2 U
5.5 J
4.2 U
5.2 J
4.2 U
4.2 U
5.1 J
4.2 U
8.1 J
4.2 U
4.2 U
4.2 U
9.2 J
8.7 J
4.2 U
18 J
5.9 J
3.4 J
0.89 J
2.9 J
0.51 J
1.3 J
1.2 J
7.1
2.2 J
3 J
29.78
117.18
62561.36
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = Microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
RL = Reporting limit
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
B = Compound was found in the blank and sample
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value
is an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
*TEC value based on USEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value
(EPA 2003)
(a) Analytes inlcuded in Total 17 PAH calculations
(b) Analytes inlcuded in Total 34 PAH calculations
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 12 of 14
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
62561.36
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS, HT
Location ID:
HT18-26
HT 18-26
HT 18-27
HT 18-27
HT18-29
HT18-29
HT18-30
HT18-30
HT18-30
HT18-30
HT18-30
HT18-30
Sample Name:
HT18-26-5070
HT 18-26-7010
HT18-27-0010
HT18-27-1020
HT18-29-SURF
HT 18-29-0010
HT18-30-SURF
HT18-30-0010
HT18-30-1030
HT18-30-3050
HT18-30-5070
HT18-30-7010
Sample Date:
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/22/2018
10/23/2018
10/22/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
5-7
7-9.5
0-0.8
0.8-2.4
0-0.5
0-1.2
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
5-7
7-10
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
1.5 J
1 J
390 J
590
17 J
37 J
8.8 J
12 J
50 J
41 J
57 J
170 J
2-Methylnaphthalene(a)
20.2
NSL
ug/kg
0.97 J
0.61 J
490
540
210 U
36 J
7.2 J
10 J
49 J
43 J
63 J
170 J
Acenaphthene(a)(b)
6.71
NSL
ug/kg
0.52 J
4.3 U
1000
570
37 J
180 J
8.3 J
35 J
78 J
58 J
69 J
110 J
Acenaphthylene(a)(b)
5.87
NSL
ug/kg
4.5 U
4.3 U
76 J
210 U
88 J-
28 J
4.8 J-
49 U
47 J
41 J
35 J
56 J
Anthracene(a)(b)
57.2
845
ug/kg
4.5 U
4.3 U
530
290
180 J-
320
17 J-
78
150
110
110
250
Benzo(a)anthracene(3)(b)
108
1,050
ug/kg
4.5 U
4.3 U
2600
200 J
1200 J-
770
120 J-
240
640
560
550
900
Benzo(a)pyrene(a)(b)
150
1,450
ug/kg
1.2 J
4.3 U
1600
140 J
320
480
63
170
450
420
410
720
Benzo(b)fluoranthene(a)(b)
10,400
NSL
ug/kg
2 J
1.8 J
2000
170 J
680
600
180
290
670
660
560
910
Benzo(e)pyrene(b)
150
1,450
ug/kg
1.7 J
1.6 J
1500
140 J
240
460
56
200
490
430
420
660
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene(a)(b)
170
NSL
ug/kg
2 J
4.3 U
1200
140 J
42 J-
390
12 J-
180
370
330
310
490
Benzo(k)fluoranthene(a)(b)
240
NSL
ug/kg
4.5 U
0.64 J
2000
210 J
750
610
140
260
570
470
450
760
CI Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
4.5 U
4.3 U
990 J
210 U
530 J
290 J
57 J
86 J
490 J
370 J
500 J
1100 J
CI Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
4.5 U
4.3 U
440 J
210 U
210 U
200 U
29 U
49 U
210 J
120 J
120 J
300 J
C1 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
6.3 J
5.5 J
3400 J
250 J
1400 J
850 J
150 J
260 J
1100 J
910 J
1000 J
2800 J
C1 -Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
4.5 U
4.3 U
590 J
760 J
210 U
200 U
29 U
49 U
120 U
110U
110U
250 J
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
7.1 J
7.2 J
1600 J
290 J
860 J
650 J
75 J
160 J
1300 J
860 J
990 J
2600 J
C2 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
4.5 U
4.3 U
440 U
210 U
230 J
200 U
33 J
49 U
410 J
300 J
400 J
910 J
C2 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
4.5 U
4.3 U
440 U
210 U
210 U
200 U
29 U
49 U
780 J
480 J
450 J
1200 J
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
6 J
5.6 J
1000 J
210 U
900 J
480 J
93 J
130 J
910 J
700 J
890 J
2300 J
C2-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
4.9 J
4.9 J
1600 J
1300 J
210 U
200 U
42 J
62 J
750 J
390 J
630 J
2200 J
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
11 J
15 J
1300 J
210 U
520 J
370 J
71 J
93 J
2600 J
1800 J
2100 J
5500 J
C3 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
4.5 U
4.3 U
440 U
210 U
210 U
200 U
29 U
49 U
270 J
210 J
260 J
480 J
C3 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
4.5 U
4.3 U
440 U
210 U
210 U
200 U
29 U
49 U
1200 J
840 J
880 J
1700 J
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
4.5 U
4.3 J
440 U
210 U
310 J
200 U
35 J
49 U
800 J
580 J
720 J
1700 J
C3-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
11 J
14 J
1600 J
380 J
280 J
200 U
73 J
76 J
2600 J
1200 J
1300 J
3900 J
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
10 J
8.7 J
620 J
210 U
210 U
230 J
50 J
50 J
2800 J
2000 J
2300 J
6500 J
C4 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
4.5 U
4.3 U
440 U
210 U
210 U
200 U
29 U
49 U
120 U
110U
110U
190 U
C4-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
20 J
22 J
870 J
210 U
210 U
200 U
110 J
71 J
3300 J
1700 J
1600 J
3800 J
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
7.1 J
6.4 J
440 U
210 U
210 U
200 U
30 J
49 U
2100 J
1500 J
1800 J
4800 J
(a)(b)
Chrysene
166
1,290
ug/kg
3.2 J
3.2 J
2600
220
970 J-
820
160 J-
310
920
780
770
1400
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene(a)(b)
33
NSL
ug/kg
4.5 U
4.3 U
440
40 J
180 J
140 J
30
54
140
120
110
190
Fluoranthene(a)(b)
423
2,230
ug/kg
1.8 J
1.8 J
6400
660
1900
1900
320
710
1700
1500
1300
2200
Fluorene(a)(b)
77
536
ug/kg
0.89 J
1.2 J
840
990
92 J
180 J
17 J
58
120
97 J
93 J
170 J
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene(a)(b)
200
NSL
ug/kg
4.5 U
4.3 U
1100
110 J
270 J-
370
60 J-
160
360
320
290
490
Naphthalene(a)(b)
176
561
ug/kg
1.4 J
0.51 J
450
570
210 U
55 J
4.6 J
7.1 J
31 J
36 J
44 J
84 J
Perylene(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
17
9.6
450
45 J
51 J
160 J
12 J
68
160
140
120
190
Phenanthrene(a)(b)
204
1,170
ug/kg
2.5 J
3.6 J
1900
2200
1000
1700
130
510
980
780
740
1300
Pyrene(a)(b)
195
1,520
ug/kg
2.3 J
2.4 J
530
1200 J-
1600
170 J-
540
1200
1100
1000
1900
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
1,610
22,800
ug/kg
32.28
32.96
30426
7685
9119
10179
1443.9
3636.6
8475
7425
6904
12100
Total PAH34 ND=1/2RL
1,610
22,800
ug/kg
145.41
144.45
46216
11465
14175
14253
2282.7
4948.6
29106
20742
21821
50915
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = Microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
RL = Reporting limit
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
B = Compound was found in the blank and sample
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value
is an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
*TEC value based on USEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value
(EPA 2003)
(a) Analytes inlcuded in Total 17 PAH calculations
(b) Analytes inlcuded in Total 34 PAH calculations
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 13 of 14
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
62561.36
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS, HT
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
HT18-31
HT 18-31
HT 18-31
HT 18-31
HT18-31
HT18-32
HT18-32
HT 18-32
HT 18-32
HT 18-32
HT18-32
HT18-32
HT 18-31-SURF
HT18-31-0010
HT18-31-1025
HT18-31-2555
HT18-31-5565
HT18-32-SURF
HT18-32-SURF-FD
HT 18-32-0010
HT18-32-0010-FD
HT18-32-1030
HT18-32-3050
HT18-32-5070
10/23/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
0-0.5
0-1.3
1.3-2.6
2.6-5.7
5.7-6.6
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
0-1
1-3
3-5
5-7
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
2.8 J
3.1 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
1.5 J
4.4 J
5.8 J
5.3 J
1.9 J
1.6 J
1.8 J
2-Methylnaphthalene(a)
20.2
NSL
ug/kg
1.9 J
3.3 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
1.2 J
2.8 J
6.4 J
5.9 J
1.4 J
1.2 J
1.3 J
Acenaphthene(a)(b)
6.71
NSL
ug/kg
9 U
1.5 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
1.1 J
2.3 J
4 J
3.4 J
0.6 J
0.44 J
4.6 U
Acenaphthylene(a)(b)
5.87
NSL
ug/kg
1 J-
1.3 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
0.92 J-
3 J-
4.1 J
3.5 J
4.4 U
4.5 U
4.6 U
Anthracene(a)(b)
57.2
845
ug/kg
9 UI
2.4 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
6.8 UI
2.4 J-
7.1 J
5.9 J
4.4 U
4.5 U
4.6 U
Benzo(a)anthracene(3)(b)
108
1,050
ug/kg
7.9 J-
14 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
5.7 J-
20 J-
43
38
0.99 J
0.62 J
0.73 J
Benzo(a)pyrene(a)(b)
150
1,450
ug/kg
6.7 J
13 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
2.5 J
10
38
35
0.85 J
4.5 U
4.6 U
Benzo(b)fluoranthene(a)(b)
10,400
NSL
ug/kg
17
28 J-
35 U
3.9 U
1 J
9
32
54
51
3.6 J
2.3 J
2.7 J
Benzo(e)pyrene(b)
150
1,450
ug/kg
5.2 J
21 J-
35 U
3.9 U
0.87 J
2.8 J
8.5
42
39
3.2 J
1.9 J
2.2 J
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene(a)(b)
170
NSL
ug/kg
1.9 J-
19 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
6.8 UJ
1.7 J-
31
29
4.2 J
2.4 J
2.9 J
Benzo(k)fluoranthene(a)(b)
240
NSL
ug/kg
11
22 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
7
21
43
39
4.4 U
4.5 U
4.6 U
CI Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
9 U
14 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
6.8 U
15 J
37 J
39 J
6.7 J
4.5 U
4.7 J
CI Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
9 U
5 .7 UI
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
6.8 U
6.7 U
11 J
9.9 J
4.4 U
4.5 U
4.6 U
C1 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
13 J
25 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
9.5 J
32 J
81 J
78 J
11 J
7.7 J
8.9 J
C1 -Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
9 U
5 .7 UI
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
6.8 U
6.7 U
8.2 J
9.3 U
4.4 U
4.5 U
4.6 U
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
10 J
21 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
6.9 J
24 J
53 J
51 J
9.7 J
7.5 J
12 J
C2 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
9 U
9.2 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
6.8 U
12 J
25 J
27 J
6.5 J
4.5 U
4.6 U
C2 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
9 U
8.5 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
6.8 U
12 J
17 J
19 J
4.4 U
4.5 U
4.6 U
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
10 J
19 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
7.8 J
24 J
59 J
61 J
11 J
7.7 J
8.5 J
C2-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
11 J
18 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
7.7 J
22 J
29 J
28 J
8.1 J
6.6 J
7.5 J
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
13 J
29 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
10 J
34 J
80 J
80 J
17 J
16 J
19 J
C3 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
9 U
6.1 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
6.8 U
8.3 J
14 J
15 J
4.4 U
4.5 U
4.6 U
C3 Fluorenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
9 U
15 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
6.8 U
12 J
32 J
33 J
6.9 J
4.5 J
5.5 J
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
9 U
12 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
6.8 U
14 J
39 J
39 J
8 J
6 J
6.6 J
C3-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
20 J
37 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
14 J
42 J
54 J
52 J
21 J
15 J
18 J
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
11 J
23 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
8.5 J
30 J
79 J
82 J
20 J
12 J
14 J
C4 Chrysenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
9 U
5 .7 UI
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
6.8 U
6.7 U
7.5 U
9.3 U
4.4 U
4.5 U
4.6 U
C4-Naphthalenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
33 J
47 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
18 J
70 J
73 J
71 J
38 J
25 J
28 J
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
9 U
17 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
6.9 J
20 J
60 J
64 J
13 J
8.7 J
9.9 J
(a)(b)
Chrysene
166
1,290
ug/kg
13 J-
29 J-
35 U
3.9 U
1 J
8 J-
27 J-
61
55
5.8
3.9 J
4.9
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene(a)(b)
33
NSL
ug/kg
2.5 J
4.6 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
1.8 J
5.4 J
10
9.7
0.52 J
4.5 U
4.6 U
Fluoranthene(a)(b)
423
2,230
ug/kg
23
52 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
15
54
110
95
3.3 J
2.5 J
4 J
Fluorene(a)(b)
77
536
ug/kg
1.9 J
3.3 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
1.5 J
5.4 J
7.5
7.1 J
1.1 J
0.65 J
1.2 J
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene(a)(b)
200
NSL
ug/kg
5.2 J-
15 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
3 J-
9.7 J-
27
25
1.4 J
0.61 J
0.78 J
Naphthalene(a)(b)
176
561
ug/kg
1.2 J
2.3 J-
35 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
0.76 J
1.7 J
6.8 J
4.9 J
1.7 J
1.4 J
1.4 J
Perylene(b)
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
1.8 J
13 J-
420
12
2.4 J
1.4 J
4.5 J
37
32
10
6.4
5.7
Phenanthrene(a)(b)
204
1,170
ug/kg
11
22 J-
35 U
3.9 U
0.36 J
5.4 J
22
48
41
2.7 J
2.3 J
4.8
Pyrene(a)(b)
195
1,520
ug/kg
13 J-
35 J-
35 U
3.9 U
0.9 J
7.9 J-
27 J-
95
85
4.2 J
3.1 J
4 J
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
1,610
22,800
ug/kg
127.2
267.7
297.5
33.15
27.96
77.58
247.4
595.9
533.4
38.96
32.67
42.51
Total PAH34 ND=1/2RL
1,610
22,800
ug/kg
283.8
576.75
997.5
76.35
59.73
189.28
600.95
1325.45
1256.7
219.66
158.52
190.41
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
ug/kg = Microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
RL = Reporting limit
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
B = Compound was found in the blank and sample
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value
is an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
*TEC value based on USEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value
(EPA 2003)
(a) Analytes inlcuded in Total 17 PAH calculations
(b) Analytes inlcuded in Total 34 PAH calculations
Harbortown Upstream Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 14 of 14
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
HT18-01
HT18-01
HT18-01
HT18-01
HT18-01
HT18-01
HT18-01
HT18-01-SURF
HT18-01-SURF-FD
HT18-01-0010
HT18-01-1030
HT18-01-3050
HT18-01-5070
HT18-01-5070-FD
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
5-7
5-7
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
10.1
8.9
6.4
6.1
6.2
4.7
5.3
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
74.5
66.3
43.6
47.1
46.9
35.6
45.4
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
1.4 U
0.96 U
0.58 J
1
1.4
0.33 J
0.44 J
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
26.3
24.4
17.6
22.2
25.7
11.8
15.4
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
29.7
31
32.4
26.5
28.9
17.3
18.3
Iron
20000
40000
mg/kg
22100
20900
15400
15200
16100
12000
15400
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
25.4
24.1
29.7
55
49
29.7
31
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.057 J
0.049 J
0.056 J
0.11 J
0.11 J
0.12 J
0.066 J
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
29.7
28.3
22.8
27.5
26.8
16
21.1
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
9.5 U
1.1 J
4.8 U
4.3 U
0.39 J
0.43 J
3.8 U
Silver(a)
1.6
2.2
mg/kg
2.7 U
1.9 U
1.4 U
0.09 J
0.11 J
1 U
1.1 U
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
119
108
85.8
112
101
61.6
70
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
29900 J
29300 J
21400
14800 J
4030
113000 J
14800 J
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
H = Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equal
to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J+ = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
HT18-01
HT 18-02
HT 18-02
HT 18-02
HT 18-02
HT 18-02
HT 18-02
HT18-01-7085
HT18-02-SURF
HT18-02-0010
HT18-02-1030
HT18-02-3060
HT18-02-6080
HT18-02-8090
10/30/2018
10/29/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
7-8.6
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-6.1
6.1-7.8
7.8-9.2
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
3
8
7.3
4.9
6.9
8.3
3
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
23.2
66.9
58
33.4
59.6
72.9
20 J
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.17 J
1.1 U
0.73 J
0.31 J
0.33 J
0.44 J
0.21 J
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
7.9
22.6
23.1
11.3
13.8
17.7
7
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
9.2
30
27.8
15
35.6
69.9
5.9
Iron
20000
40000
mg/kg
7400
19400
19700
11200
13700
17000
7150
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
13.7 J
24.3
28.7
33.4
68.2
85.4
11.7
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.12 U
0.064 J
0.062 J
0.069 J
0.23 J
0.2 J
0.02 J
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
10
26.1
28.8
14.1
17.8
21.1
8.8
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
3.2 U
7.5 U
1.1 J
0.61 J
4 U
3.8 U
3.6 U
Silver(a)
1.6
2.2
mg/kg
0.92 U
2.2 U
1.7 U
1 U
1.1 U
1.1 U
1 U
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
29.8
100
104
57.8
81.6
121
26.6
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
12600 J
23400 J
26300
8890
9210
27600
6460 J
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
H = Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equ
to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxima
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J+ = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxiirc
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-03
HT18-03
HT18-03
HT18-03
HT18-03
HT18-03
HT 18-04
Sample Name:
HT18-03-SURF
HT18-03-0010
HT18-03-1030
HT18-03-1030-FD
HT18-03-3045
HT18-03-4560
HT18-04-SURF
Sample Date:
10/29/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/29/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
3-4.6
4.6-6
0-0.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
7.5
7.8
10.9
11.3
11.6
9.9
5.3
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
132
162
360
355
421
64.6
40.3
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
6.1
4.9
18.1
18.1
25.1
0.21 J
0.8 U
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
84.6
87.1
191
189
232
18.2
15.6
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
113
129
185
174
196
16.8
19.2
Iron
20000
40000
mg/kg
20000
22600
22100
23200
20500
18800
13100
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
113
173
437
502
500
10.9
15.4
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.36
0.52 J
1.2 J
0.95 J
1.5 J
0.1 UJ
0.036 J
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
58.8
52.6
87.6
89.8
101
25.9
17.9
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
1.8 J
3.5 J
2.1 J
1.6 J
2.2 J
3.5 U
0.93 J
Silver(a)
1.6
2.2
mg/kg
0.72 J
2.3
4.8
3.7
3.9
0.99 U
1.6 U
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
587
566
868
864
1010
46.3
70.9
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
53100 J
70900 J
64200 J
74500 J
67100 J
6470 J
17700 J
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
H = Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equ
to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxima
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J+ = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxiirc
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
HT 18-04
HT 18-04
HT 18-04
HT 18-04
HT18-05
HT18-05
HT18-05
HT18-04-0005
HT18-04-0530
HT18-04-0530-FD
HT18-04-3040
HT18-05-SURF
HT18-05-0010
HT18-05-1030
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
0-0.6
0.6-3.3
0.6-3.3
3.3-4.3
0-0.5
0-1
1-2.7
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
3
4.1
3.2
4.3
10.1
8.6
10.4
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
18.6 J
28.3
27.7
14.9 J
126
80.7
119
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.6 U
0.67 U
0.52 U
0.47 U
3.9
1.1 J
2.4
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
7.8
10.3
10.7
6.8
53.7
32.9
49.7
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
6.6
7.7
8.4
3.5
89.1
44.9
72.6
Iron
20000
40000
mg/kg
7190
10500
10400
6110
22200
23400
26300
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
6.2
5.8
6
3.1
97.9
54.3
88.2
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.13 U
0.13 U
0.12 U
0.12 U
0.19 J
0.089 J
0.22 J
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
9.8
14.7
15.1
8
54.5
39.8
46.7
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
4.2 U
4.7 U
3.6 U
3.3 U
1.4 J
1.2 J
1.2 J
Silver(a)
1.6
2.2
mg/kg
1.2 U
1.3 U
1 U
0.94 U
0.55 J
0.14 J
0.6 J
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
31.5
30.9
29.9
14.6
358
175
298
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
6310
11400
7760
2860
41800 J
40800 J
58400 J
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
H = Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equ
to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxima
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J+ = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxiirc
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-05
HT18-05
HT18-06
HT18-06
HT18-06
HT18-06
HT18-06
Sample Name:
HT18-05-3050
HT18-05-5060
HT18-06-SURF
HT18-06-0010
HT18-06-1030
HT18-06-1030-FD
HT18-06-3060
Sample Date:
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
2.7-5.1
5.1-5.9
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
3-6
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
9.6
7.9
9.3
9.6
10.3
10.5
11.1
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
311
195
92.6
89.1
109
97
172
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
8.3
1.6
1.3 U
1.2 U
1.6
1.8
10.6
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
100
15.3
32.1
30.9
43.1
42
101
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
162
109
44.9
38.7
49.1
47.6
100
Iron
20000
40000
mg/kg
18000
9670
21800
25600
24700
25000
26000
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
461
327
41.8
35.8
49.1
51
108
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
1.2 J
0.59 J
0.12 J
0.25 U
0.35
0.19 U
0.61
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
61.5
16.4
35
40
42.3
43.7
63.4
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
1.7 J
0.81 J
1.3 J
8.6 U
7.1 U
6.5 U
7.1 U
Silver(a)
1.6
2.2
mg/kg
1.8
0.4 J
0.18 J
2.5 U
0.45 J+
0.49 J+
2.9
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
715
405
169
145
209
201
504
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
36200 J
24100 J
47600 J
22700
46200
32500
67100
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
H = Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equ
to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxima
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J+ = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxiirc
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 5 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
HT18-06
HT18-06
HT18-06
HT18-07
HT18-07
HT18-07
HT18-07
HT18-06-6070
HT18-06-7080
HT18-06-8010
HT18-07-SURF
HT18-07-0020
HT18-07-2050
HT18-07-5070
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
6-7.1
7.1-8.1
8.1-9.7
0-0.5
0-1.8
1.8-4.8
4.8-7
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
5
8.8
7.5
4.5
2.8
9.4
6.4
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
456
216
221
40.4
29.3
289
168
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
5.1
7.4
12
0.72
0.86
16.2
7.2
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
39.4
108
117
18.3
13.1
126
76.3
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
72.9
76.8
82
23.6
13.9
124
62.3
Iron
20000
40000
mg/kg
8450
13100
15500
9050
5920
19400
14800
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
193
317
243
40.8
25.1
248
143
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.96
0.44
0.55
0.071 J
0.054 J-
0.65
0.36
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
33.8
78.9
58.6
15.3
12.4
55.2
38.3
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
4.4 U
4 U
4.4 U
4.5 U
3.6 U
4.7 U
4.9 U
Silver(a)
1.6
2.2
mg/kg
1.1 J+
1.7
1.7
0.094 J
0.11 J+
1.8
2.1
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
383
584
433
76.7
70.8
543
282
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
16100
18100
42200
19200 J
10600
59400
34100
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
H = Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equ
to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxima
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J+ = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxiirc
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 6 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-07
HT18-08
HT18-08
HT18-08
HT18-08
HT18-08
HT18-08
Sample Name:
HT18-07-7090
HT18-08-SURF
HT18-08-0010
HT18-08-1020
HT18-08-1020-FD
HT18-08-2045
HT18-08-4565
Sample Date:
10/29/2018
10/22/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
7-8.9
0-0.5
0-1
1-2.3
1-2.3
2.3-4.6
4.6-6.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
8.4
7.6
10.3
10
9.4
34.1
3.7
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
294
64.7
79.5
79.8
71
205
30.4
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
13.2
1.4
1.3 U
1.9
1.4
1.3
0.58 U
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
134
29.6
31.9
31.8
29.7
19.2
10.8
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
124
41.6
42.5
62.6
70.1
143
27.6
Iron
20000
40000
mg/kg
16400
21500
25600
18000
22100
12300
10100
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
233
37.5 J-
39.4
89.6
47.4
175
20.1
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.46
0.093 J
0.12 J
0.2
0.24
1.3
0.22
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
46.1
37
40.2
31.4
35.1
19.5
12.6
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
4 U
1.2 J
1.6 J
1.1 J
4.3 J
2.4 J
4.1 U
Silver(a)
1.6
2.2
mg/kg
3.3
0.058 J
0.094 J+
0.97 J+
0.15 J+
0.21 J+
1.2 U
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
659
158
169
196
180
287
67.7
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
46600
34500
35900
36000
35100
49400
33300
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
H = Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equ
to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxima
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J+ = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxiirc
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 7 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
HT18-08
HT18-09
HT18-09
HT18-09
HT18-09
HT18-09
HT18-09
HT18-08-6580
HT18-09-SURF
HT18-09-0010
HT18-09-1030
HT18-09-3050
HT18-09-3050-FD
HT18-09-5070
10/23/2018
10/22/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
6.5-8
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
3-5
5-7
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
2.6
8.3
10.7
10.1
9.1
9.7
12
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
16.5 J
67.1
93.5
81.9
77
82.6
107
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.12 J
1.3 U
1.5
1.3
1.4
1.6
3
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
7.5
27.5
35.9
33.3
34.4
36.4
53
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
4.8
34.7
46.2
39.9
42.4
44.4
54.6
Iron
20000
40000
mg/kg
6360
22300
28200
24400
22100
22900
28700
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
4.2 J
28 J-
36.4
37.4
45.3
47.4
62.9
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.11 U
0.063 J
0.079 J
0.14 J
0.18
0.12 J
0.33
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
8.8
32.1
42.9
39
37.4
38.6
53.5
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
3.5 U
1.2 J
2.2 J
1.3 J
1.3 J
2 J
1.8 J
Silver(a)
1.6
2.2
mg/kg
1 U
0.13 J
2.8 U
0.18 J+
0.37 J+
0.36 J+
1.2 J+
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
19.3
135
176
156
168
180
274
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
5120 J
41500
36200
29200
30000
27600
37600
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
H = Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equ
to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxima
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J+ = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxiirc
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 8 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
HT18-09
HT18-10
HT18-10
HT18-11
HT18-11
HT18-11
HT18-11
HT18-09-7010
HT18-10-SURF
HT18-10-0010
HT18-11-SURF
HT18-11-0010
HT18-11-1030
HT18-11-3050
10/23/2018
10/22/2018
10/24/2018
10/22/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
7-9.7
0-0.5
0-1.1
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
8.4
2.5
2.1
8.8
8.8
9.1
5.3
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
99.6
11.7 J
11.8 J
74.7
70.6
71.4
44.3
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
5
0.53 U
0.2 J
0.96
0.94 J
1.3
1.1
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
51.8
11.7
6.1
30.4
31
32.3
18
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
64.5
5
4.6
41.2
39.3
45.6
21
Iron
20000
40000
mg/kg
19500
6750
4260
23100
25700
21800
11300
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
125 J
22.9 J-
11.3
49.4 J-
36.5
45.4
26.1
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.67
0.024 J
0.11 U
0.16 J
0.097 J-
0.21
0.16 U
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
48.7
7.5
5.6
36.3
36.2
34.3
17.6
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
0.8 J
3.7 U
3.3 U
1.3 J
1.1 J
6.7 U
5 U
Silver(a)
1.6
2.2
mg/kg
0.89 J
1.1 U
0.93 U
0.095 J
0.11 J
0.21 J
0.088 J
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
273
26.6
18.8
150
149
167
79
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
42400 J
2340
4000
49500
32300 J
32900
16300
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
H = Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equ
to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxima
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J+ = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxiirc
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 9 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-11
HT18-11
HT18-12
HT18-12
HT18-12
HT18-12
HT18-12
Sample Name:
HT18-11-5070
HT18-11-7010
HT18-12-SURF
HT18-12-SURF-FD
HT18-12-0010
HT18-12-1030
HT18-12-3050
Sample Date:
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/22/2018
10/22/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
5-7
7-9.4
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
2.7
2.4
6.5
7.8
9.6
11.1
6.5
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
20
16.2 J
66.7
72.1
110
169
106
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.16 J
0.15 J
1.5
1.5
4.4
9.1
1.2
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
9.3
8.3
30.2
32.7
50.8
82.9
15.7
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
6.3
4.7
73.4
79.2
101
156
89.5
Iron
20000
40000
mg/kg
7830
6720
18100
20200
21800
20100
13800
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
4.7
4.5 J
73.1 J-
76.7 J-
200
306
176
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.12 U
0.12 U
0.18 J
0.19 J
0.48
0.8
0.52
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
10.5
9.2
29.7
34.1
54
51.4
23
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
3.3 U
3.6 U
0.92 J
1.5 J
1.5 J
2.6 J
0.57 J
Silver(a)
1.6
2.2
mg/kg
0.94 U
1 U
0.23 J
0.19 J
0.66 J+
1.1 J
0.12 J+
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
26.5
22
209
227
428
535
391
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
10200
5590 J
27500
27400
31700
41700
17600
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
H = Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equ
to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxima
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J+ = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxiirc
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 10 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
HT18-12
HT18-12
HT18-13
HT18-13
HT18-13
HT18-13
HT18-13
HT18-12-5070
HT18-12-7010
HT18-13-SURF
HT18-13-0010
HT18-13-1030
HT18-13-3050
HT18-13-5060
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
5-7
7-9.7
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
5-6.3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
3.4
2.6
9.3
10.2
12
9.2
9.3
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
35.3
23.3
82
224
230
127
91.6
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.48 U
0.17 J
1.2 U
7
16.8
10.2
1.4
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
12.1
11
32.5
50.7
108
55.1
23.7
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
10.2
7
39.6
67.6
100
96.8
53.8
Iron
20000
40000
mg/kg
10500
9490
24700
19900
21400
20100
18300
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
8.2
6.5 J
30.8
103
191
139
81.4
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.011 J
0.12 U
0.1 J
0.19 U
0.54
0.44
0.18
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
15.1
13.3
44.1
38.2
42.2
36.5
26.9
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
3.4 U
3 U
8.6 U
5.4 U
6 U
4.4 U
5 U
Silver(a)
1.6
2.2
mg/kg
0.96 U
0.87 U
2.5 U
0.47 J+
1.3 J+
0.49 J+
1.4 U
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
38.4
31.3
132
233
465
353
194
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
17300
7970 J
33200 J
38900
40700 J
20900 J
16300 J
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
H = Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equ
to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxima
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J+ = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxiirc
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 11 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
HT18-13
HT18-13
HT18-13
HT18-14
HT18-14
HT18-14
HT18-15
HT18-13-6090
HT18-13-6090-FD
HT18-13-9010
HT18-14-SURF
HT18-14-0010
HT18-14-1020
HT18-15-SURF
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/24/2018
6.3-8.8
6.3-8.8
8.8-10
0-0.5
0-1.3
1.3-1.9
0-0.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
8.1
8.4
2.5
3.4
6.2
5.4
3.4
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
66.4
65.8
25
24.2
133
52.3
32.6
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.79
0.68
0.47 U
0.57 U
2.6
0.82
0.7 U
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
19.9
20.7
7.3
8.3
28.4
15.7
10.6
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
52.6
50.8
4.8
27.2
40.7
20.4
11.1
Iron
20000
40000
mg/kg
17400
22000
6810
6910
7800
15600
7980
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
52.6
59.4
6.2
17.4
87.1
93.5
13.6 J
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.082 J
0.17
0.12 U
0.017 J
0.13 J
0.11 J
0.055 J
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
25.2
23.6
9
9.7
15.4
17.6
11.2
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
0.72 J
0.6 J
3.3 U
4 U
0.72 J
3.7 U
4.9 U
Silver(a)
1.6
2.2
mg/kg
0.12 J
0.11 J
0.94 U
1.1 U
0.14 J
1.1 U
1.4 U
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
157
153
26.7
73.2
121
78.2
68.6
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
10600 J
8110 J
5460 J
17300 J
21300 J
12800 J
13300
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
H = Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equ
to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxima
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J+ = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxiirc
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 12 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
HT18-15
HT18-15
HT18-15
HT18-15
HT18-16
HT18-17
HT18-17
HT18-15-0005
HT18-15-0530
HT18-15-3050
HT18-15-3050-FD
HT18-16-SURF
HT18-17-SURF
HT18-17-0010
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/25/2018
0-0.5
0.5-3
3-5
3-5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
4.1
9.8
7.6
7.6
5.2
3.5
6.8
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
59.5
100
59.3
53.3
89.5
20.8
83.4
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.14 J
0.16 J
0.22 J
0.2 J
1.2
0.48 U
0.14 J
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
8
18.4
21.2
20.3
39.6
11.8
16.6
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
9.3
18.1
19.5
19.2
44.3
9.8
15.9
Iron
20000
40000
mg/kg
7630
19200
20500
20600
15700
10200
18200
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
10.5
10.2
10.8
9.7
288 J
22.2 J
8.8
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.013 J-
0.0091 J-
0.12 R
0.0092 J-
0.11 J
0.13 U
0.11 R
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
9.2
25.5
26
26
43.8
12.4
22.8
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
3.1 U
0.34 J
0.71 J
0.5 J
0.97 J
3.4 U
0.56 J
Silver(a)
1.6
2.2
mg/kg
0.89 U
0.84 U
1.2 U
1.2 U
0.16 J
0.96 U
0.91 U
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
34.5
47.3
54.9
52
139
37.1
47.6
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
5690
9790
13400
9460
33600
6220
7280 J+
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
H = Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equ
to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxima
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J+ = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxiirc
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 13 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
HT18-17
HT18-17
HT18-18
HT18-18
HT18-18
HT18-18
HT18-18
HT18-17-1030
HT18-17-3050
HT18-18-SURF
HT18-18-0020
HT18-18-2030
HT18-18-3035
HT18-18-3555
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/24/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
1-3
3-4.7
0-0.5
0-1.9
1.9-2.8
2.8-3.6
3.6-5.4
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
7.4
9.3
6
9.8
7.6
2.8
9.3
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
32.5
79.3
85.2
268
47.7
17.5 J
47.8
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.21 J
0.14 J
1.9
14.4
0.23 J
0.13 J
1.5
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
18.6
16.2
30.5
36.7
16.4
8.1
19.8
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
18.1
18.2
56.6
302
19.8
6.1
19.8
Iron
20000
40000
mg/kg
19600
19300
17900
13000
19100
6840
21200
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
10.6
9.6
89.1 J
623 J
9.5 J
8.5 J
9.8
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.12 R
0.11 R
0.22 U
4.8 J-
0.065 J-
0.012 J-
0.1 R
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
25.1
22.2
27.2
42.7
25.4
7.7
26
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
0.5 J
0.48 J
0.92 J
1.7 J
0.44 J
3.8 U
0.49 J
Silver(a)
1.6
2.2
mg/kg
1 U
0.98 U
0.3 J
2.6
1 U
1.1 U
1.2 U
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
51.3
45
180
772
55.6
19.4
314
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
8010 J+
7570 J+
31100
58100
14300
8730
6120
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
H = Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equ
to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxima
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J+ = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxiirc
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 14 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
HT18-19
HT18-19
HT18-19
HT18-19
HT18-20
HT18-20
HT18-20
HT18-19-SURF
HT18-19-0010
HT18-19-1020
HT18-19-2030
HT18-20-SURF
HT18-20-0010
HT18-20-1020
10/24/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/24/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
0-0.5
0-1
1-2.3
2.3-2.8
0-0.5
0-0.8
0.8-1.8
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
2.9
11.4
2.7
3
4.1
5.5
3.8
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
33.6
240
28.4
19.8 J
61
44.8
61.8
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.71
10.8
0.38 J
0.11 J
0.88
3.7
0.21 J
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
18.5
35.1
7.7
6.2
22.3
27.6
21.4
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
39
274
45.9
3.1
36.5
125
11.2
Iron
20000
40000
mg/kg
8550
16100
5950
5870
12900
7690
21100
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
65.4 J
624
74
4.5
50.9 J
157
12.8
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.19
3.5 J-
0.84 J-
0.11 R
0.12 J
0.19 J-
0.0098 J-
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
12.3
36.7
7.6
5.9
18.7
13
27.2
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
3.8 U
1.6 J
3.2 U
0.53 J
5.3 U
0.43 J
0.91 J
Silver(a)
1.6
2.2
mg/kg
0.091 J
1.9
0.13 J
1.1 U
1.5 U
0.13 J
1 U
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
77.3
769
95.3
14.2
108
91.2
60.9
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
8060
59800
7680
4720
16700
5310 J
7000
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
H = Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equ
to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxima
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J+ = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxiirc
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 15 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
HT18-20
HT18-20
HT18-21
HT18-21
HT18-23
HT18-23
HT18-23
HT18-20-2030
HT18-20-2030-FD
HT18-21-SURF
HT18-21-0015
HT18-23-SURF
HT18-23-0010
HT18-23-1030
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/24/2018
10/25/2018
10/23/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
1.8-2.8
1.8-2.8
0-0.5
0-1.7
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
3.6
3.4
2.8
5.1
8
3.1
2.5
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
21.4 J
21.2
30.4
102
82.5
20.4 J
11.3 J
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.14 J
0.16 J
0.56 U
0.47
1.3 U
0.42 J
0.12 J
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
8.6
8.8
9.1
96.8
29.5
10.4
6.1
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
5.8
8.1
25.6
26.5
41.2
11.1
3.4
Iron
20000
40000
mg/kg
7520
8490
7080
21100
23900
7090
5990
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
10.4
8.2
15.7 J
143
41.4 J
18.8
3
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.014 J-
0.022 J-
0.059 J
0.03 J-
0.29 U
0.13 U
0.11 U
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
8.5
9.1
8.5
8.2
34.3
10.4
6.6
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
3.9 U
3.6 U
3.9 U
4.5
9.2 U
4.5 U
3.9 U
Silver(a)
1.6
2.2
mg/kg
1.1 U
1 U
1.1 U
0.92
2.6 U
1.3 U
1.1 U
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
24.1
22.6
37.4
46.7
146
39.8
14.9
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
9870
6290
22600
10800
33000
9430
4160
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
H = Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equ
to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxima
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J+ = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximf
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 16 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
HT18-23
HT18-23
HT18-23
HT 18-24
HT 18-24
HT 18-24
HT 18-24
HT18-23-3050
HT18-23-5070
HT18-23-7010
HT18-24-SURF
HT18-24-0010
HT18-24-1025
HT18-24-2550
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/23/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
3-5
5-7
7-9.2
0-0.5
0-1
1-2.7
2.7-5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
2.6
3.5
3.7
5.1
3
2.9
3.4
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
14.6 J
28.6
32.6
47.5
22.7
20 J
36.2
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.22 J
0.19 J
0.21 J
0.92 U
0.16 J
0.15 J
0.19 J
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
7
10.8
12.2
19.8
7.8
8.4
12.8
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
4.5
8.1
9.4
51
6.7
5.7
10.1
Iron
20000
40000
mg/kg
6730
11700
13300
13300
7090
9370
12300
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
3.7
6.5
7.7 J
45.5 J
11
4.8
7.9
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.11 U
0.12 U
0.12 U
1.4
0.045 J-
0.12 R
0.13 R
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
8.3
14.5
16.8
19.1
9.3
10.4
16.9
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
4 U
4.4 U
4.3 U
0.81 J
3.6 U
3.6 U
3.3 U
Silver(a)
1.6
2.2
mg/kg
1.1 U
1.3 U
1.2 U
1.8 U
1 U
1 U
0.95 U
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
25.9
31.2
34.7
133
34.6
22.3
34.9
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
6350
11000
7600 J
26700
7370 J
6950 J
8400 J
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
H = Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equ
to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxima
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J+ = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxiirc
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 17 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-24
HT18-24
HT 18-24
HT18-25
HT18-25
HT18-25
HT18-25
Sample Name:
HT18-24-5065
HT18-24-5065-FD
HT18-24-6575
HT18-25-SURF
HT18-25-0010
HT18-25-1030
HT18-25-3040
Sample Date:
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/23/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
Dept
i Interval (ft):
5-6.6
5-6.6
6.6-7.8
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-4.2
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
3.1
2.8
5.9
7.9
8.5
12.8
7.8
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
24
21.6
44.4
65.4
157
259
122
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.15 J
0.14 J
0.2 J
1.1 U
10.2
10.3
0.89
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
9.1
8.3
16.7
26.6
76.3
42.6
18.9
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
5.5
4.8
17.3
35.7
73.9
217
94.9
Iron
20000
40000
mg/kg
8280
7600
19000
20300
17000
22000
15800
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
5.1
4.8
9.1 J
35.2 J
191
524
283
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.0072 J-
0.005 J-
0.1 U
0.3
0.79 J-
3.4 J-
2.8 J-
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
10.4
9.6
24.8
29.2
33.4
39.4
21.1
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
3.5 U
3 U
3.1 U
7.7 U
1.3 J
0.94 J
0.72 J
Silver(a)
1.6
2.2
mg/kg
1 U
0.85 U
0.87 U
2.2 U
0.91 J
3
2.2
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
23.4
22.6
48.6
137
326
837
425
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
7550 J
6720 J
6920 J
35600
34700 J
67200 J
49500 J
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
H = Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equ;
to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxima
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J+ = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxim;
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 18 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
HT18-25
HT18-25
HT18-26
HT18-26
HT18-26
HT18-26
HT18-26
HT18-25-4070
HT18-25-7010
HT18-26-SURF
HT18-26-0010
HT18-26-1030
HT18-26-3050
HT18-26-3050-FD
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/23/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
4.2-7
7-9.5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
3-5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
3.3
3.3
4.2
2.8
2.6
3
3.2
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
20.9 J
21.4
39.1
21.9 J
13.8 J
20.5 J
21
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.15 J
0.14 J
1.8
0.18 J
0.14 J
0.15 J
0.18 J
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
9.1
9.2
21.7
6.5
6.6
9.1
9.6
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
6.7
6.6
35.1
8.5
4.5
6.2
6.4
Iron
20000
40000
mg/kg
10100
9660
11200
6230
7080
9310
9050
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
5.8
5.3 J
113 J
67.7
4
5
4.7
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.12 R
0.12 U
0.16 U
0.11 U
0.11 U
0.12 U
0.12 U
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
11.7
11.2
19.8
7.5
7.6
11.8
11.7
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
4 U
3.6 U
0.6 J
3.9 U
3.6 U
4.2 U
3.4 U
Silver(a)
1.6
2.2
mg/kg
1.1 U
1 U
0.18 J
0.047 J
1 U
1.2 U
0.98 U
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
25.2
24.2
137
40.5
16.5
26.2
25.5
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
11400 J
7360 J
13700
7290
12600
9290
7730
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
H = Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equ
to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxima
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J+ = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximf
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 19 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-26
HT18-26
HT18-27
HT18-27
HT18-29
HT18-29
HT18-30
Sample Name:
HT18-26-5070
HT18-26-7010
HT18-27-0010
HT18-27-1020
HT18-29-SURF
HT18-29-0010
HT18-30-SURF
Sample Date:
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/22/2018
10/23/2018
10/22/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
5-7
7-9.5
0-0.8
0.8-2.4
0-0.5
0-1.2
0-0.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
3.4
3.3
3.4
8.1
4.6
7.3
9.6
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
25.5
25.7
70.2
78.1
42.7
72.1
82.6
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.17 J
0.15 J
0.55 J
0.39 J
0.52 U
0.58
1.1 U
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
10.7
10.5
38.5
20.5
21.3
12.5
33.5
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
6.4
7.3
21.4
25.9
12
36.6
39.6
Iron
20000
40000
mg/kg
10400
10600
12800
24400
11500
10400
27000
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
5.3
6.2 J
34.2
52.1
98.7 J-
80.6
38.4 J-
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.13 U
0.12 U
0.3
0.12 U
0.11 U
0.17
0.13 J
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
12.5
13.6
48.8
29.9
9.6
10.8
40.8
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
4 U
3.2 U
3.9 U
3.6 U
3.7 U
0.45 J
1.6 J
Silver(a)
1.6
2.2
mg/kg
1.2 U
0.92 U
1.1 U
1 U
1 U
1 U
2.2 U
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
26.2
28.5
98.5
81.9
51.1
96.3
143
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
8310
7960 J
15200
14700
9360
8650
25700
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
H = Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equ
to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxima
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J+ = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximf
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 20 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
HT18-30
HT18-30
HT18-30
HT18-30
HT18-30
HT18-31
HT18-31
HT18-30-0010
HT18-30-1030
HT18-30-3050
HT18-30-5070
HT18-30-7010
HT18-31-SURF
HT18-31-0010
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/25/2018
0-1
1-3
3-5
5-7
7-10
0-0.5
0-1.3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
9.5
12.2
13.6
11.4
10.9
7
6
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
82.9
228
203
308
186
63.5
43.2
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
1.1 U
10.1
17.4
20
17.4
1.2 U
0.51 J
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
32
96.3
160
89.9
77.9
26.6
19.7
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
40
106
134
106
105
30
24.6
Iron
20000
40000
mg/kg
25800
22400
22200
22100
24400
23700
17600
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
36.5
203
243
252
227 J
21.1 J-
20.7
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.11 J
0.61
0.82
1.2
1.2
0.17 J
0.1 J-
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
40.1
48.5
50.3
53.6
47.6
33.1
24.8
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
1.6 J
2.1 J
2.6 J
2.3 J
1.5 J
1.7 J
0.67 J
Silver(a)
1.6
2.2
mg/kg
0.1 J+
1.3 J
1.6
1.3 J
1.2 J
2.3 U
1.2 U
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
137
414
484
532
464
93.6
74.8
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
30800
36400
41100
47000
36300 J
29000
25500 J+
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
H = Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equ
to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxima
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J+ = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxiirc
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 21 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
HT18-31
HT18-31
HT18-31
HT18-32
HT18-32
HT18-32
HT18-32
HT18-31-1025
HT18-31-2555
HT18-31-5565
HT18-32-SURF
HT18-32-SURF-FD
HT18-32-0010
HT18-32-0010-FD
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
1.3-2.6
2.6-5.7
5.7-6.6
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
0-1
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
10.6
2.9
4.4
7
6.4
5.3
6.2
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
70.2
53.2
29.7
49.7
47.1
31.1
31.1
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.72 U
0.57 U
0.46 U
0.89
0.82
0.7
0.81
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
13.1
12.9
10.7
23.3
21.7
16.8
16.6
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
8.5
7.7
17.5
27.1
25
16.7
25.3
Iron
20000
40000
mg/kg
10200
12000
19200
19700
18400
12700
15800
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
6.7
6.7
10
26.6 J-
25.7 J-
22.6
26.6
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.037 J
0.016 J
0.015 J
2.8
0.28
0.22
0.21
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
11.7
13.8
13.5
30.8
28.7
20.5
21.9
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
1 J
4 U
3.2 U
1 J
0.97 J
4.2 U
4.8 U
Silver(a)
1.6
2.2
mg/kg
1.4 U
1.1 U
0.92 U
1.5 U
1.5 U
1.2 U
1.4 U
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
28.4
31.6
41.3
98.3
103
64.9
72.8
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
46500 J
2180 J
2900 J
21800
23300
16700
14200
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
H = Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equ
to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxima
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J+ = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxiirc
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 22 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-32
HT18-32
HT18-32
Sample Name:
HT18-32-1030
HT18-32-3050
HT18-32-5070
Sample Date:
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
1-3
3-5
5-7
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
3.4
3.7
6.2
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
23.4
33.9
39.6
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.2 J
0.24 J
0.23 J
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
11.7
14.5
14.3
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
7.6
10.5
11.1
Iron
20000
40000
mg/kg
11200
14400
14300
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
6.2
8.1
7.9
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.13 U
0.13 U
0.13 U
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
13.4
17.2
17.5
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
3.7 U
4.8 U
4.2 U
Silver(a)
1.6
2.2
mg/kg
1 U
1.4 U
1.2 U
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
33.2
40.3
42.8
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
8050
9130
14400
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 3XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed 2XPEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed TEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems
(MacDonald et al. 2000)
D = Sample was analyzed at a higher dilution factor
H = Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equ
to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
J- = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approxima
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J+ = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximf
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 23 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR SEM/AVS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-01
HT18-01
HT 18-02
HT18-03
HT 18-04
HT 18-05
HT18-06
HT18-07
Sample Name:
HT 18-01-SURF
HT18-01-SURF-FD
HT18-02-SURF
HT18-03-SURF
HT18-04-SURF
HT18-05-SURF
HT18-06-SURF
HT18-07-SURF
Sample Date:
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Cadmium
umole/g
0.0069
0.0073
0.006
0.032
0.0052
0.024
0.013
0.0098
Copper
umole/g
0.3
0.31
0.28
1.1
0.2
0.94
0.59
0.28
Lead
umole/g
0.092
0.099
0.083
0.37
0.07
0.37
0.2
0.12
Mercury
umole/g
0.00007 U
0.00007 U
0.000065 U
0.000065 U
0.000055 U
0.000075 U
0.00007 U
0.000045 U
Nickel
umole/g
0.3
0.31
0.26
0.55
0.22
0.54
0.42
0.22
Zinc
umole/g
1.1
1.2
0.94
6
0.75
3.8
2.1
1.1
Acid Volatile Sulfides (AVS)
umole/g
3.8
5.9
12.8
37.5
10.4
25.8
10.5
5.3
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
0.466
0.318
0.122
0.216
0.119
0.219
0.319
0.318
NOTES:
AVS = Acid volatile sulfides
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio
FD = Field duplicate
HT = Harbortown
SEM = Simultaneously extracted metals
umole/g = micromole per gram
B = Compound was found in the blank and sample
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
" SEM/AVS not calculated because AVS was not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR SEM/AVS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
HT18-08
HT18-09
HT18-10
HT18-11
HT18-12
HT18-12
HT18-13
HT18-14
HT18-08-SURF
HT18-09-SURF
HT18-10-SURF
HT 18-11-SURF
HT18-12-SURF
HT18-12-SURF-FD
HT18-13-SURF
HT18-14-SURF
10/22/2018
10/22/2018
10/22/2018
10/22/2018
10/22/2018
10/22/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Cadmium
umole/g
0.012
0.0082
0.00098 J
0.0089
0.0089
0.012
0.0098
0.0039
Copper
umole/g
0.51
0.43
0.057
0.5
0.67
0.88
0.39
0.24
Lead
umole/g
0.14
0.12
0.1
0.19
0.22
0.3
0.12
0.16
Mercury
umole/g
0.000085 U
0.00008 U
0.000034 U
0.000085 U
0.00007 U
0.00007 U
0.00007 U
0.000023 J
Nickel
umole/g
0.34
0.31
0.099
0.34
0.27
0.35
0.37
0.14
Zinc
umole/g
1.7
1.4
0.25
1.6
1.8
2.3
1.3
0.59
Acid Volatile Sulfides (AVS)
umole/g
14
9.3
0.47 J
8.0
16.3
23.4
7.6
0.71 U
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
0.195
0.239
1.1
0.328
0.182
0.163
0.295
--
NOTES:
AVS = Acid volatile sulfides
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio
FD = Field duplicate
HT = Harbortown
SEM = Simultaneously extracted metals
umole/g = micromole per gram
B = Compound was found in the blank and sample
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
" SEM/AVS not calculated because AVS was not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR SEM/AVS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-15
HT18-16
HT18-17
HT18-18
HT18-19
HT 18-20
HT18-21
HT18-23
Sample Name:
HT18-15-SURF
HT18-16-SURF
HT18-17-SURF
HT18-18-SURF
HT18-19-SURF
HT18-20-SURF
HT 18-21-SURF
HT18-23-SURF
Sample Date:
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/23/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Cadmium
umole/g
0.0019 J
0.0031
0.0012 J
0.004
0.0044
0.0072
0.0015 J
0.0052
Copper
umole/g
0.14
0.31
0.065
0.3
0.27
0.24
0.15
0.43
Lead
umole/g
0.057
0.11
0.068
0.11
0.26
0.21
0.11
0.16
Mercury
umole/g
0.000045 U
0.00006 U
0.000035 U
0.00006 U
0.000039 U
0.00005 U
0.000036 U
0.00008 U
Nickel
umole/g
0.1
0.18
0.063
0.17
0.11
0.18
0.09 J
0.29
Zinc
umole/g
0.46
1
0.26
0.89
0.78
1.1
0.91
1.4
Acid Volatile Sulfides (AVS)
umole/g
3.3
6.5
0.41 J
5.1
1.1
7.2
2.5
13.5
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
0.231
0.254
1.09
0.292
1.29
0.238
0.506
0.167
NOTES:
AVS = Acid volatile sulfides
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio
FD = Field duplicate
HT = Harbortown
SEM = Simultaneously extracted metals
umole/g = micromole per gram
B = Compound was found in the blank and sample
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
" SEM/AVS not calculated because AVS was not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-7 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-01
HT 18-01
HT18-02
HT 18-03
HT18-04
HT18-05
HT 18-06
HT 18-07
Sample Name:
HT 18-01-SURF
HT18-01-SURF-FD
HT18-02-SURF
HT 18-03-SURF
HT18-04-SURF
HT 18-05-SURF
HT18-06-SURF
HT18-07-SURF
Sample Date:
10/29/18
10/29/18
10/29/18
10/29/18
10/29/18
10/29/18
10/29/18
10/29/18
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
foe
fraction
0.0299
0.0293
0.0234
0.0531
0.0177
0.0418
0.0476
0.0192
Diesel Range Organics (C10-C20)
mg/kg
45 J
42 J
29 J
930
20 J
320
180
100
DRO Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
mg/kg
166
162
130
294
98
232
264
106
Oil Range Organics (C20-C36)
mg/kg
53
54
38 J
1300
26 J
460
220
130
ORO Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
mg/kg
296
290
231
525
175
413
470
190
I TPH
mg/kg
98
96
67
2230
46
780
400
230
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
- Sediment benchmark for DRO used in calculation of
sample-specific risk screening level is 5543 mg/kg
- Sediment benchmark for ORO used in calculation of
sample-specific risk screening level is 9883 mg/kg
FD = Field duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
mg/kg = milligram per kilogram
TPH = Total petroleum hydrocarbon
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-7 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-08
HT 18-09
HT18-10
HT18-11
HT18-12
HT18-12
HT18-13
HT18-14
Sample Name:
HT18-08-SURF
HT18-09-SURF
HT18-10-SURF
HT 18-11-SURF
HT18-12-SURF
HT18-12-SURF-FD
HT18-13-SURF
HT18-14-SURF
Sample Date:
10/22/18
10/22/18
10/22/18
10/22/18
10/22/18
10/22/18
10/29/18
10/29/18
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
foe
fraction
0.0345
0.0415
0.00234
0.0495
0.0275
0.0274
0.0332
0.0173
Diesel Range Organics (C10-C20)
mg/kg
51 J
64
34
49 J
170
110
42 J
49
DRO Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
mg/kg
191
230
13
274
152
152
184
96
Oil Range Organics (C20-C36)
mg/kg
56 J
73
34
51 J
180
120
48
60
ORO Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
mg/kg
341
410
23
489
272
271
328
171
I TPH
mg/kg
107
137
68
100
350
230
90
109
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
- Sediment benchmark for DRO used in calculation of
sample-specific risk screening level is 5543 mg/kg
- Sediment benchmark for ORO used in calculation of
sample-specific risk screening level is 9883 mg/kg
FD = Field duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
mg/kg = milligram per kilogram
TPH = Total petroleum hydrocarbon
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-7 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-15
HT18-16
HT18-17
HT18-18
HT18-19
HT 18-20
HT 18-21
HT 18-23
Sample Name:
HT18-15-SURF
HT18-16-SURF
HT18-17-SURF
HT18-18-SURF
HT18-19-SURF
HT18-20-SURF
HT 18-21-SURF
HT18-23-SURF
Sample Date:
10/24/18
10/24/18
10/24/18
10/24/18
10/24/18
10/24/18
10/24/18
10/23/18
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
foe
fraction
0.0133
0.0336
0.00622
0.0311
0.00806
0.0167
0.0226
0.033
Diesel Range Organics (C10-C20)
mg/kg
200
220
33
170
160
130
360
42 J
DRO Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
mg/kg
74
186
34
172
45
93
125
183
Oil Range Organics (C20-C36)
mg/kg
170
230
38
190
200
140
470
39 J
ORO Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
mg/kg
131
332
61
307
80
165
223
326
I TPH
mg/kg
370
450
71
360
360
270
830
81
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
- Sediment benchmark for DRO used in calculation of
sample-specific risk screening level is 5543 mg/kg
- Sediment benchmark for ORO used in calculation of
sample-specific risk screening level is 9883 mg/kg
FD = Field duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
mg/kg = milligram per kilogram
TPH = Total petroleum hydrocarbon
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-7 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-24
HT 18-25
HT18-26
HT 18-29
HT18-30
HT 18-31
HT 18-32
HT18-32
Sample Name:
HT18-24-SURF
HT18-25-SURF
HT18-26-SURF
HT18-29-SURF
HT18-30-SURF
HT 18-31-SURF
HT18-32-SURF
HT18-32-SURF-FD
Sample Date:
10/23/18
10/23/18
10/23/18
10/22/18
10/22/18
10/23/18
10/23/18
10/23/18
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
foe
fraction
0.0267
0.0356
0.0137
0.00936
0.0257
0.029
0.0218
0.0233
Diesel Range Organics (C10-C20)
mg/kg
280
63
180
200
56
67
65
30 J
DRO Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
mg/kg
148
197
76
52
142
161
121
129
Oil Range Organics (C20-C36)
mg/kg
300
84
180
270
65
61
66
33 J
ORO Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
mg/kg
264
352
135
93
254
287
215
230
I TPH
mg/kg
580
147
360
470
121
128
131
63
NOTES:
Detected values are Bolded
- Sediment benchmark for DRO used in calculation of
sample-specific risk screening level is 5543 mg/kg
- Sediment benchmark for ORO used in calculation of
sample-specific risk screening level is 9883 mg/kg
FD = Field duplicate
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
mg/kg = milligram per kilogram
TPH = Total petroleum hydrocarbon
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR SEM/AVS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT 18-24
HT18-25
HT 18-26
HT18-29
HT18-30
HT 18-31
HT18-32
HT18-32
Sample Name:
HT18-24-SURF
HT18-25-SURF
HT18-26-SURF
HT18-29-SURF
HT18-30-SURF
HT18-31-SURF
HT18-32-SURF
HT18-32-SURF-FD
Sample Date:
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/22/2018
10/22/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Cadmium
umole/g
0.0036
0.0058
0.0087
0.003
0.0098
0.006
0.0077
0.0064
Copper
umole/g
0.26
0.46
0.32
0.11
0.46
0.28
0.26
0.21
Lead
umole/g
0.2
0.23
0.49
0.3
0.15
0.076
0.1
0.08
Mercury
umole/g
0.000055 U
0.000075 U
0.000047 U
0.000031 U
0.000065 U
0.00007 U
0.000055 U
0.00005 U
Nickel
umole/g
0.16
0.28
0.18
0.11 J
0.41
0.29
0.3
0.25
Zinc
umole/g
1
1.5
1.4
0.46
1.4
0.78
0.84
0.72
Acid Volatile Sulfides (AVS)
umole/g
6.8
9.4
3
1
8.4
4.8
16.4
14.5
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
0.241
0.261
0.807
0.959
0.282
0.302
0.0926
0.0874
NOTES:
AVS = Acid volatile sulfides
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio
FD = Field duplicate
HT = Harbortown
SEM = Simultaneously extracted metals
umole/g = micromole per gram
B = Compound was found in the blank and sample
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
" SEM/AVS not calculated because AVS was not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
62561.36
TABLE 3-8 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR CYANIDE, HT
Location ID:
HT18-01
HT18-01
HT 18-02
HT18-03
HT 18-04
HT18-05
HT18-06
Sample Name:
HT18-01-SURF
HT18-01-SURF-FD
HT18-02-SURF
HT18-03-SURF
HT18-04-SURF
HT18-05-SURF
HT18-06-SURF
Sample Date:
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
EPA Region V
RCRA *
Unit
Cyanide, Weak Acid Dissociable
0.1
mg/kg
2.6 U
2.5 U
0.84 .1
1.3 J
0.81 .1
I.I .1
2.6 UJ
Cyanide, Total
0.1
mg/kg
2.7 U
I.SJ
2.4 U
2.5 U
2 U
2.9 U
2.7
NOTES:
Source: * EPA Region V Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (EPA 2003).
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed the RCRA screening value
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
FD = Field Duplicate
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater
than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
62561.36
TABLE 3-8 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR CYANIDE, HT
Location ID:
HT18-07
HT18-08
HT18-09
HT18-10
HT18-11
HT18-12
HT18-12
Sample Name:
HT18-07-SURF
HT18-08-SURF
HT18-09-SURF
HT18-10-SURF
HT18-11-SURF
HT18-12-SURF
HT18-12-SURF-FD
Sample Date:
10/29/2018
10/22/2018
10/22/2018
10/22/2018
10/22/2018
10/22/2018
10/22/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
EPA Region V
RCRA *
Unit
Cyanide, Weak Acid Dissociable
0.1
mg/kg
1.6 UJ
3.2 U
3 U
1.3 U
3.4 U
2.5 U
2.7 U
Cyanide, Total
0.1
mg/kg
1.7 U
3.1 U
3 U
1.3 U
3.2 U
2.7 U
2.5 U
NOTES:
Source: * EPA Region V Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (EPA 2003).
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed the RCRA screening value
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
FD = Field Duplicate
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater
than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
62561.36
TABLE 3-8 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR CYANIDE, HT
Location ID:
HT18-13
HT18-14
HT18-15
HT18-16
HT18-17
HT18-18
HT18-19
HT18-20
HT18-21
Sample Name:
HT18-13-SURF
HT18-14-SURF
HT18-15-SURF
HT18-16-SURF
HT18-17-SURF
HT18-18-SURF
HT18-19-SURF
HT18-20-SURF
HT18-21-SURF
Sample Date:
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
EPA Region V
RCRA *
Unit
Cyanide, Weak Acid Dissociable
0.1
mg/kg
2.6 UJ
1.3 U
1.8 U
2.4 U
1.2 U
2.3 U
1.5 U
1.7 U
1.3 U
Cyanide, Total
0.1
mg/kg
2.7 U
1.5 U
1.6 U
I.I .1
1.2 U
2.4 U
0.83 J
1.9 U
1.3 U
NOTES:
Source: * EPA Region V Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (EPA 2003).
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed the RCRA screening value
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
FD = Field Duplicate
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater
than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
62561.36
TABLE 3-8 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR CYANIDE, HT
Location ID:
HT18-23
HT 18-24
HT18-25
HT18-26
HT18-29
HT18-30
HT18-31
HT18-32
HT18-32
Sample Name:
HT18-23-SURF
HT18-24-SURF
HT18-25-SURF
HT18-26-SURF
HT18-29-SURF
HT18-30-SURF
HT18-31-SURF
HT18-32-SURF
HT18-32-SURF-FD
Sample Date:
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/22/2018
10/22/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
EPA Region V
RCRA *
Unit
Cyanide, Weak Acid Dissociable
0.1
mg/kg
3.1 U
2.1 U
3.1 U
1.6 U
1.2 U
2.5 U
2.6 U
0.89 J
2 U
Cyanide, Total
0.1
mg/kg
2.9 U
2.1 U
2.8 U
1.9 U
1.2 U
2.5 U
2.6 U
2 U
2 U
NOTES:
Source: * EPA Region V Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (EPA 2003).
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed the RCRA screening value
HT = Harbortown Upstream Area
FD = Field Duplicate
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater
than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated)
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT18-01
HT18-01
HT18-01
HT18-01-SURF
HT18-01-SURF-FD
HT18-01-0010
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/30/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
2.99
0.0299
--
--
2.93
0.0293
--
--
2.14
0.0214
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.01
0.27
0.27
0.001
0.005
0.16
0.16
0.00
0.01
0.31
0.31
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.01
0.25
0.25
0.001
0.004
0.14
0.14
0.0003
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.01
0.24
0.24
0.0005
0.01
0.21
0.21
0.00
0.03
1.40
1.40
0.00
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.02
0.00
0.00
0
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.0000
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.01
0.43
0.43
0.001
0.01
0.38
0.38
0.001
0.03
1.36
1.36
0.00
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.12
4.01
4.01
0.005
0.07
2.46
2.46
0.00
0.22
10.28
10.28
0.01
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.16
5.35
5.35
0.01
0.09
3.14
3.14
0.00
0.08
3.74
3.74
0.00
Benzo [b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.29
9.70
9.70
0.01
0.17
5.80
5.80
0.01
0.30
14.02
14.02
0.01
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.20
6.69
6.69
0.01
0.12
4.10
4.10
0.00
0.22
10.28
10.28
0.01
Benzo [g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.17
5.69
5.69
0.01
0.10
3.28
3.28
0.00
0.21
9.81
9.81
0.01
Benzo [kjfluoranthene
981
1,220
0.22
7.36
7.36
0.01
0.12
4.10
4.10
0.00
0.30
14.02
14.02
0.01
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.07
2.27
2.27
0.002
0.04
1.37
1.37
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.16
5.35
5.35
0.01
0.09
3.14
3.14
0.00
0.26
12.15
12.15
0.02
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.08
2.51
2.51
0.004
0.05
1.54
1.54
0.00
0.11
5.14
5.14
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.10
3.28
3.28
"
0.06
1.91
1.91
"
0.13
6.07
6.07
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
0.06
1.97
1.97
0.003
0.04
1.23
1.23
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
~
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
--
0.05
1.81
1.81
0.003
0.03
1.13
1.13
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.07
2.37
2.37
0.004
0.04
1.47
1.47
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.27
9.03
9.03
0.01
0.15
5.12
5.12
0.01
0.34
15.89
15.89
0.02
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.05
1.57
1.57
0.001
0.03
0.89
0.89
0.00
0.07
3.41
3.41
0.00
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.53
17.73
17.73
0.03
0.31
11
11
0.01
0.71
33.18
33.18
0.05
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.02
0.54
0.54
0.001
0.01
0.34
0.34
0.001
0.04
1.87
1.87
0.00
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.01
0.28
0.28
0.001
0.01
0.17
0.17
0.000
0.08
3.74
3.74
0.01
Perylene
967
431
0.05
1.71
1.71
0.002
0.03
1.06
1.06
0.00
0.02
0.89
0.89
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.18
6.02
6.02
0.01
0.12
4.10
4.10
0.01
0.40
18.69
18.69
0.03
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.33
11.04
11.04
0.02
0.20
7
7
0.01
0.55
25.70
25.70
0.04
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.14
--
--
--
0.08
--
--
--
0.25
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT18-01
HT18-01
HT18-01
HT18-01-1030
HT18-01-3050
HT18-01-5070
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
1-3
3-5
5-7
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
1.48
0.0148
--
--
0.403
0.00403
--
--
11.3
0.113
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.01
0.52
0.52
0.001
0.01
2.06
2.06
0.005
0.00
0.03
0.03
0.0001
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.01
0.53
0.53
0.001
0.05
11.91
11.91
0.03
0.02
0.19
0.19
0.0004
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.04
2.50
2.50
0.01
0.04
8.68
8.68
0.02
0.02
0.19
0.19
0.0004
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.02
0.0001
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.09
6.08
6.08
0.01
0.06
15.63
15.63
0.03
0.04
0.32
0.32
0.001
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.25
16.89
16.89
0.02
0.21
52
52
0.06
0.09
1
1
0.001
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.16
10.81
10.81
0.01
0.11
27
27
0.03
0.06
1
1
0.001
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.29
19.59
19.59
0.02
0.19
47
47
0.05
0.07
1
1
0.001
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.20
13.51
13.51
0.01
0.14
35
35
0.04
0.06
0
0
0.001
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.14
9.46
9.46
0.01
0.13
32
32
0.03
0.05
0
0
0.0004
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.24
16.22
16.22
0.02
0.20
50
50
0.05
0.08
1
1
0.001
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.10
6.55
6.55
0.01
0.09
22
22
0.02
0.04
0
0
0.0004
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.29
19.59
19.59
0.03
0.25
62.03
62.03
0.08
0.12
1.06
1.06
0.001
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.16
10.81
10.81
0.02
0.13
32
32
0.05
0.07
1
1
0.001
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.14
9.46
9.46
--
0.12
29.78
29.78
--
0.05
0.44
0.44
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
~
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
0.12
8.11
8.11
0.01
0.09
22.58
22.58
0.03
0.04
0.37
0.37
0.0005
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
12.16
12.16
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
12.66
12.66
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.08
5
5
0.01
0.05
12.16
12.16
0.02
0.03
0.22
0.22
0.0004
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.09
5.95
5.95
0.01
0.07
17.37
17.37
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.09
5.74
5.74
0.01
0.05
12.66
12.66
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.07
4.66
4.66
0.01
0.05
12.66
12.66
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.32
21.62
21.62
0.03
0.24
60
60
0.07
0.10
1
1
0.001
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.05
3.58
3.58
0.003
0.05
12.41
12.41
0.01
0.02
0.19
0.19
0.0002
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.81
55
55
0.08
0.54
134
134
0.19
0.23
2
2
0.003
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.05
3.65
3.65
0.01
0.04
9.18
9.18
0.02
0.02
0.14
0.14
0.0003
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.01
0.56
0.56
0.001
0.05
11.91
11.91
0.03
0.02
0.19
0.19
0.001
Perylene
967
431
0.07
4.39
4.39
0.005
0.05
11.66
11.66
0.01
0.02
0.21
0.21
0.0002
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.53
35.81
35.81
0.06
0.35
87
87
0.15
0.17
2
2
0.003
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.56
38
38
0.05
0.44
109
109
0.16
0.20
2
2
0.003
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.44
--
--
--
1.23
--
--
--
0.02
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT18-01
HT18-01
HT18-02
HT18-01-5070-FD
HT18-01-7085
HT18-02-SURF
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/29/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
5-7
7-8.6
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
1.48
0.0148
--
--
1.26
0.0126
--
--
2.34
0.0234
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.02
1.42
1.42
0.003
0.01
0.79
0.79
0.002
0.01
0.38
0.38
0.001
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.09
6.08
6.08
0.01
0.01
0.76
0.76
0.002
0.01
0.36
0.36
0.001
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.09
6
6
0.01
0.06
5
5
0.01
0.02
0.94
0.94
0.002
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.01
0.81
0.81
0.002
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.37
0.37
0.001
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.17
11
11
0.02
0.07
5
5
0.01
0.07
2.86
2.86
0.005
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.40
27
27
0.03
0.18
14
14
0.02
0.21
8.97
8.97
0.01
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.28
19
19
0.02
0.13
10
10
0.01
0.17
7.26
7.26
0.01
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.31
21
21
0.02
0.13
10
10
0.01
0.28
11.97
11.97
0.01
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.24
16
16
0.02
0.10
8
8
0.01
0.18
7.69
7.69
0.01
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.23
16
16
0.01
0.04
3.49
3.49
0.003
0.14
5.98
5.98
0.01
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.35
24
24
0.02
0.13
10
10
0.01
0.22
9.40
9.40
0.01
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.18
12
12
0.01
0.06
5
5
0.01
0.10
4.10
4.10
0.004
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.53
35.81
35.81
0.05
0.20
16
16
0.02
0.23
9.83
9.83
0.01
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.34
23
23
0.03
0.14
11
11
0.02
0.14
5.98
5.98
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.24
16.22
16.22
--
0.08
6.51
6.51
--
0.11
4.70
4.70
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
~
0.13
9
9
0.02
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
0.25
17
17
0.02
0.08
6
6
0.01
0.08
3.55
3.55
0.005
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.10
6.69
6.69
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.09
6.15
6.15
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.21
14
14
0.02
0.05
4
4
0.01
0.06
2.48
2.48
0.004
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.16
11
11
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.19
12.84
12.84
0.02
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
2.52
2.52
0.004
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.10
6.76
6.76
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.43
29
29
0.03
0.17
13
13
0.02
0.28
11.97
11.97
0.01
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.09
6
6
0.01
0.03
2.54
2.54
0.002
0.05
2.01
2.01
0.002
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
1.10
74
74
0.11
0.44
35
35
0.05
0.66
28.21
28.21
0.04
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.08
5
5
0.01
0.05
4
4
0.01
0.04
1.58
1.58
0.003
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.09
6.08
6.08
0.02
0.01
1.11
1.11
0.003
0.01
0.36
0.36
0.001
Perylene
967
431
0.12
8
8
0.01
0.05
4.21
4.21
0.004
0.06
2.48
2.48
0.003
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.75
51
51
0.09
0
31
31
0.05
0.36
15
15
0.03
Pyrene
697
9,090
1
59
59
0.08
0
29
29
0.04
0.44
18.80
18.80
0.03
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.73
--
--
--
0.32
--
--
--
0.22
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT18-02
HT18-02
HT18-02
HT18-02-0010
HT18-02-1030
HT18-02-3060
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-1
1-3
3-6.1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
2.63
0.0263
--
--
0.889
0.00889
--
--
0.921
0.00921
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.01
0.22
0.22
0.001
0.02
1.80
1.80
0.004
0.06
6.73
6.73
0.02
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.03
1.25
1.25
0.003
0.05
5.06
5.06
0.011
0.22
23.89
23.89
0.05
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.01
0.49
0.49
0.001
0.08
8.89
8.89
0.02
0.44
47.77
47.77
0.10
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
3.58
3.58
0.01
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.03
0.99
0.99
0.002
0.11
12.37
12.37
0.02
0.69
74.92
74.92
0.13
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.12
4.56
4.56
0.01
0.19
21.37
21.37
0.03
0.94
102.06
102.06
0.12
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.10
3.76
3.76
0.004
0.16
18.00
18.00
0.02
0.80
86.86
86.86
0.09
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.19
7.22
7.22
0.01
0.14
15.75
15.75
0.02
0.65
70.58
70.58
0.07
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.14
5.32
5.32
0.01
0.11
12.37
12.37
0.01
0.52
56.46
56.46
0.06
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.15
5.70
5.70
0.01
0.10
11.02
11.02
0.01
0.47
51.03
51.03
0.05
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.17
6.46
6.46
0.01
0.16
18.00
18.00
0.02
0.75
81.43
81.43
0.08
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.06
2.24
2.24
0.002
0.08
9.11
9.11
0.01
0.40
43.43
43.43
0.05
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.15
5.70
5.70
0.01
0.24
27.00
27.00
0.04
1.30
141.15
141.15
0.18
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.07
2.66
2.66
0.004
0.16
18.00
18.00
0.03
1.00
109
109
0.16
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.08
3.19
3.19
"
0.10
11.25
11.25
--
0.49
53.20
53.20
--
C2-Naphthalenes
510
~
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
6.97
6.97
0.01
0.47
51
51
0.10
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
0.05
1.94
1.94
0.003
0.08
9
9
0.01
0.49
53
53
0.07
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.04
1.44
1.44
0.002
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.05
1.75
1.75
0.003
0.05
5.40
5.40
0.01
0.37
40
40
0.07
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.03
1.25
1.25
0.002
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.05
1.83
1.83
0.003
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.20
7.60
7.60
0.01
0.20
22.50
22.50
0.03
0.97
105.32
105.32
0.12
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.05
1.79
1.79
0.002
0.04
4.39
4.39
0.004
0.18
19.54
19.54
0.02
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.36
13.69
13.69
0.02
0.49
55.12
55.12
0.08
2.30
249.73
249.73
0.35
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.02
0.72
0.72
0.001
0.06
6.52
6.52
0.01
0.37
40.17
40.17
0.07
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.03
1.25
1.25
0.003
0.05
5.06
5.06
0.013
0.22
23.89
23.89
0.06
Perylene
967
431
0.05
1.86
1.86
0.002
0.05
5.51
5.51
0.01
0.22
23.89
23.89
0.02
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.17
6.46
6.46
0.01
0.47
52.87
52.87
0.09
2.20
239
239
0.40
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.27
10.27
10.27
0.01
0.42
47.24
47.24
0.07
2.00
217.16
217.16
0.31
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.13
--
--
--
0.55
--
--
--
2.75
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT18-02
HT18-02
HT18-03
HT18-02-6080
HT18-02-8090
HT18-03-SURF
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/29/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
6.1-7.8
7.8-9.2
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
2.76
0.0276
--
--
0.646
0.00646
--
--
5.31
0.0531
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.04
1.45
1.45
0.003
0.02
2.48
2.48
0.01
0.02
0.43
0.43
0.001
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.21
8
8
0.02
0.10
15.48
15.48
0.03
0.03
0.56
0.56
0.001
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.17
6
6
0.01
0.08
12.85
12.85
0.03
0.03
0.58
0.58
0.001
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.04
1.27
1.27
0.003
0.01
1.86
1.86
0.004
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.24
9
9
0.01
0.15
23.22
23.22
0.04
0.06
1.13
1.13
0.002
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.99
36
36
0.04
0.35
54.18
54.18
0.06
0.56
11
11
0.01
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.38
14
14
0.01
0.21
32.51
32.51
0.03
0.45
8
8
0.01
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.72
26
26
0.03
0.26
40.25
40.25
0.04
1.00
19
19
0.02
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.53
19
19
0.02
0.20
30.96
30.96
0.03
0.73
14
14
0.01
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.47
17.03
17.03
0.02
0.19
29.41
29.41
0.03
0.58
11
11
0.01
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.87
32
32
0.03
0.28
43.34
43.34
0.04
0.86
16
16
0.02
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.42
15
15
0.02
0.16
24.77
24.77
0.03
0.24
4.52
4.52
0.005
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
1.30
47.10
47.10
0.06
0.45
69.66
69.66
0.09
0.67
12.62
12.62
0.02
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.68
25
25
0.04
0.30
46.44
46.44
0.07
0.33
6
6
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.54
19.57
19.57
--
0.19
29.41
29.41
--
0.40
7.53
7.53
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
~
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.17
3.20
3.20
0.01
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
0.38
14
14
0.02
0.16
24.77
24.77
0.03
0.38
7
7
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.23
4.33
4.33
0.01
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.21
3.95
3.95
0.004
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.21
8
8
0.01
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.27
5.08
5.08
0.01
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.33
6.21
6.21
0.01
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.35
6.59
6.59
0.01
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.26
4.90
4.90
0.01
Chrysene
844
826
1.10
40
40
0.05
0.37
57.28
57.28
0.07
1.00
19
19
0.02
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.21
7.61
7.61
0.01
0.07
11.30
11.30
0.010
0.17
3.20
3.20
0.003
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
2.40
87
87
0.12
0.89
137.77
137.77
0.19
2.20
41
41
0.06
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.18
7
7
0.01
0.09
13.31
13.31
0.02
0.05
1.00
1.00
0.002
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.21
7.61
7.61
0.02
0.10
15.48
15.48
0.04
0.03
0.47
0.47
0.001
Perylene
967
431
0.15
5.43
5.43
0.01
0.10
15.17
15.17
0.02
0.16
3.01
3.01
0.003
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
1.60
58
58
0.10
0.73
113.00
113.00
0.19
0.74
14
14
0.02
Pyrene
697
9,090
1.90
69
69
0.10
0.76
117.65
117.65
0.17
1.40
26
26
0.04
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.75
--
--
--
1.27
--
--
--
0.33
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 5 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT18-03
HT18-03
HT18-03
HT18-03-0010
HT18-03-1030
HT18-03-1030-FD
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-1
1-3
1-3
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
7.09
0.0709
--
--
6.42
0.0642
--
--
7.45
0.0745
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.05
0.72
0.72
0.002
0.36
5.61
5.61
0.01
0.35
4.70
4.70
0.01
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.34
4.80
4.80
0.01
0.30
4.67
4.67
0.01
0.30
4.03
4.03
0.01
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.08
1.09
1.09
0.002
0.23
3.58
3.58
0.01
0.24
3.22
3.22
0.01
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.17
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.83
0.83
0.00
0.05
0.64
0.64
0.001
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.15
2.12
2.12
0.004
0.22
3
3
0.01
0.35
5
5
0.01
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.96
14
14
0.02
0.95
15
15
0.02
0.99
13
13
0.02
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
1.10
16
16
0.02
0.84
13
13
0.01
0.87
12
12
0.01
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
1.40
20
20
0.02
1.00
16
16
0.02
0.93
12
12
0.01
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
1.10
16
16
0.02
0.75
12
12
0.01
0.78
10
10
0.01
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
1.20
17
17
0.02
0.69
11
11
0.01
0.69
9
9
0.01
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
1.30
18
18
0.02
0.91
14
14
0.01
1.00
13
13
0.01
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.54
8
8
0.01
0.92
14
14
0.02
0.94
12.62
12.62
0.01
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.17
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.58
9
9
0.01
0.55
7
7
0.01
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
1.20
16.93
16.93
0.02
1.90
29.60
29.60
0.04
1.90
25.50
25.50
0.03
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.17
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.35
5.45
5.45
0.01
0.33
4.43
4.43
0.01
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.57
8
8
0.01
3.00
47
47
0.07
2.80
38
38
0.06
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.17
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.64
9.97
9.97
0.01
0.63
8.46
8.46
0.01
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.17
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.60
25
25
0.04
1.50
20
20
0.03
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.79
11.14
11.14
--
1.60
24.92
24.92
--
1.60
21.48
21.48
--
C2-Naphthalenes
510
~
0.36
5
5
0.01
3.80
59.19
59.19
0.12
3.60
48.32
48.32
0.09
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
0.73
10
10
0.01
4.40
69
69
0.09
4.20
56.38
56.38
0.08
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.17
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.48
7.48
7.48
0.01
0.46
6.17
6.17
0.01
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.54
8
8
0.01
2.10
32.71
32.71
0.04
2.00
26.85
26.85
0.03
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.38
5.36
5.36
0.01
1.10
17.13
17.13
0.02
1.10
14.77
14.77
0.02
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.51
7
7
0.01
5.90
91.90
91.90
0.16
5.60
75.17
75.17
0.13
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.74
10
10
0.01
4.00
62.31
62.31
0.08
3.80
51.01
51.01
0.06
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.17
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.67
9
9
0.01
5.10
79.44
79.44
0.12
5.30
71.14
71.14
0.11
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.57
8
8
0.01
2.90
45.17
45.17
0.05
2.70
36.24
36.24
0.04
Chrysene
844
826
1.60
23
23
0.03
1.40
22
22
0.03
1.40
19
19
0.02
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.38
5.36
5.36
0.005
0.25
3.89
3.89
0.00
0.26
3.49
3.49
0.003
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
2.90
41
41
0.06
2.80
44
44
0.06
2.70
36
36
0.05
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.09
1.20
1.20
0.002
0.23
3.58
3.58
0.01
0.22
2.95
2.95
0.01
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.34
4.80
4.80
0.01
0.30
4.67
4.67
0.01
0.30
4.03
4.03
0.01
Perylene
967
431
0.31
4.37
4.37
0.005
0.27
4.21
4.21
0.00
0.27
3.62
3.62
0.004
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
1.10
16
16
0.03
1.80
28
28
0.05
1.80
24
24
0.04
Pyrene
697
9,090
2.00
28
28
0.04
2.00
31
31
0.04
2.10
28
28
0.04
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.42
--
--
--
1.17
--
--
--
0.99
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 6 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT18-03
HT18-03
HT18-04
HT18-03-3045
HT18-03-4560
HT18-04-SURF
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/29/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
3-4.6
4.6-6
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
6.71
0.0671
--
--
0.647
0.00647
--
--
1.77
0.0177
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.52
7.75
7.75
0.017
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.0002
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.26
3.87
3.87
0.009
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.11
0.0003
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.240
3.58
3.58
0.007
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.15
0.0003
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.047
0.70
0.70
0.0015
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.27
4.02
4.02
0.007
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.38
0.38
0.0006
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.72
10.73
10.73
0.013
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.0002
0.03
1.81
1.81
0.0021
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.55
8.20
8.20
0.008
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
1.75
1.75
0.0018
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.68
10.13
10.13
0.010
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
2.66
2.66
0.0027
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.58
8.64
8.64
0.009
0.00
0.28
0.28
0.0003
0.03
1.86
1.86
0.0019
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.48
7.15
7.15
0.007
0.00
0.49
0.49
0.0005
0.03
1.47
1.47
0.0013
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.77
11.48
11.48
0.012
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.0001
0.04
2.15
2.15
0.0022
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.82
12.22
12.22
0.013
0.01
0.79
0.79
0.0008
0.02
0.85
0.85
0.0009
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.60
8.94
8.94
0.015
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
1.70
25.34
25.34
0.033
0.01
1.10
1.10
0.0014
0.03
1.64
1.64
0.0021
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.44
6.56
6.56
0.015
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
2.90
43.22
43.22
0.065
0.02
2.32
2.32
0.0035
0.02
1.02
1.02
0.0015
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.59
8.79
8.79
0.009
0.00
0.74
0.74
0.0007
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
1.60
23.85
23.85
0.03
0.01
1.00
1.00
0.0015
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
1.50
22.35
22.35
--
0.01
1.70
1.70
--
0.02
1.19
1.19
--
C2-Naphthalenes
510
~
4.70
70.04
70.04
0.137
0.02
2.63
2.63
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
4.30
64.08
64.08
0.086
0.02
3.09
3.09
0.0041
0.01
0.68
0.68
0.0009
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.44
6.56
6.56
0.006
0.00
0.63
0.63
0.0006
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
2.10
31.30
31.30
0.041
0.01
1.51
1.51
0.0020
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
1.10
16.39
16.39
0.017
0.01
1.19
1.19
0.0013
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
6.90
102.83
102.83
0.18
0.04
5.87
5.87
0.01
0.01
0.51
0.51
0.0009
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
3.80
56.63
56.63
0.068
0.02
2.63
2.63
0.0032
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
5.70
84.95
84.95
0.13
0.06
8.66
8.66
0.01
0.01
0.68
0.68
0.0010
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
2.60
38.75
38.75
0.042
0.01
1.85
1.85
0.0020
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
1.10
16.39
16.39
0.019
0.00
0.62
0.62
0.0007
0.05
2.66
2.66
0.0031
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.170
2.53
2.53
0.0023
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.44
0.44
0.0004
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
2.20
32.79
32.79
0.046
0.00
0.20
0.20
0.0003
0.10
6
6
0.01
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.23
3.43
3.43
0.006
0.00
0.15
0.15
0.0003
0.00
0.24
0.24
0.0004
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.260
3.87
3.87
0.010
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.15
0.0004
Perylene
967
431
0.19
2.83
2.83
0.003
0.00
0.40
0.40
0.0004
0.01
0.62
0.62
0.0006
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
1.70
25.34
25.34
0.043
0.01
0.83
0.83
0.0014
0.05
2.54
2.54
0.0043
Pyrene
697
9,090
1.70
25.34
25.34
0.036
0.00
0.39
0.39
0.0006
0.07
4
4
0.01
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
1.12
"
--
--
0.05
"
--
--
0.04
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 7 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT18-04
HT18-04
HT18-04
HT18-04-0005
HT18-04-0530
HT18-04-0530-FD
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.6
0.6-3.3
0.6-3.3
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
0.631
0.00631
--
--
1.14
0.0114
--
--
0.776
0.00776
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.00
0.17
0.17
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.00
0.14
0.14
0.00
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.002
0.29
0.29
0.001
0.00
0.03
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.001
0.09
0.09
0.0002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.00
0.46
0.46
0.00
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.02
2.38
2.38
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.02
2.69
2.69
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.03
3.96
3.96
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.11
0.00
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.01
2.22
2.22
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.08
0.00
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.00
0.43
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.02
3.49
3.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.01
1.24
1.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.02
2.85
2.85
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.01
1.54
1.54
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.00
0.68
0.68
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.01
1.74
1.74
"
0.00
0.00
0.00
"
0.00
0.00
0.00
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
~
0.00
0.78
0.78
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
0.01
1.46
1.46
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0000
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.00
0.71
0.71
0.00
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.01
0.82
0.82
0.001
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.01
1.38
1.38
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.01
1.03
1.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0000
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.01
2.06
2.06
0.00
0.01
0.68
0.68
0.00
0.01
0.88
0.88
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.00
0.74
0.74
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.02
3.65
3.65
0.004
0.002
0.18
0.18
0.00
0.002
0.19
0.19
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.005
0.82
0.82
0.0007
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.05
7.45
7.45
0.01
0.002
0.16
0.16
0.00
0.001
0.15
0.15
0.00
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.003
0.40
0.40
0.001
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.001
0.10
0.10
0.0003
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.01
1.17
1.17
0.001
0.00
0.28
0.28
0.0003
0.00
0.39
0.39
0.0004
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.02
2.54
2.54
0.004
0.001
0.09
0.09
0.00
0.001
0.12
0.12
0.00
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.03
5.07
5.07
0.01
0.002
0.15
0.15
0.00
0.001
0.17
0.17
0.00
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.07
--
--
--
0.00
"
--
"
0.00
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 8 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT18-04
HT18-05
HT18-05
HT18-04-3040
HT18-05-SURF
HT18-05-0010
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/30/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
3.3-4.3
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
0.286
0.00286
--
--
4.18
0.0418
--
--
4.08
0.0408
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.00
0.11
0.11
0.00
0.02
0.45
0.45
0.00
0.01
0.25
0.25
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.55
0.55
0.00
0.05
1.10
1.10
0.00
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
1.03
1.03
0.00
0.01
0.32
0.32
0.00
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.10
2.27
2.27
0.00
0.02
0.47
0.47
0.00
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.66
16
16
0.02
0.17
4.17
4.17
0.00
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.69
17
17
0.02
0.16
3.92
3.92
0.00
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.00
0.23
0.23
0.00
1.00
24
24
0.02
0.29
7.11
7.11
0.01
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.00
0.17
0.17
0.00
0.70
17
17
0.02
0.21
5.15
5.15
0.01
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.56
13
13
0.01
0.21
5.15
5.15
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.81
19
19
0.02
0.25
6.13
6.13
0.01
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.35
8.37
8.37
0.01
0.14
3.43
3.43
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0
0
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.68
16.27
16.27
0.02
0.21
5.15
5.15
0.01
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.31
7
7
0.01
0.09
2.18
2.18
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0
0
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
"
0.39
9.33
9.33
"
0.13
3.19
3.19
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
~
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
1.35
1.35
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.27
6.46
6.46
0.01
0.09
2.08
2.08
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
4.55
4.55
0.01
0.08
1.86
1.86
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.16
3.83
3.83
0.00
0.05
1.30
1.30
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.17
4.07
4.07
0.01
0.08
2.01
2.01
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.21
5.02
5.02
0.01
0.07
1.76
1.76
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.01
1.75
1.75
0.00
0.21
5.02
5.02
0.01
0.10
2.43
2.43
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.16
3.83
3.83
0.00
0.05
1.27
1.27
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.001
0.38
0.38
0.00
1.00
24
24
0.03
0.30
7.35
7.35
0.01
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.17
4.07
4.07
0.00
0.06
1.54
1.54
0.001
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.001
0.24
0.24
0.00
2.30
55
55
0.08
0.53
12.99
12.99
0.02
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
1.48
1.48
0.00
0.02
0.47
0.47
0.001
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.55
0.55
0.00
0.05
1.10
1.10
0.003
Perylene
967
431
0.00
0.77
0.77
0.001
0.20
4.78
4.78
0.00
0.06
1.42
1.42
0.001
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.84
20
20
0.03
0.21
5.15
5.15
0.01
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.001
0.26
0.26
0.00
1.40
33
33
0.05
0.42
10.29
10.29
0.01
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.01
--
--
--
0.41
--
--
--
0.13
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 9 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT18-05
HT18-05
HT18-05
HT18-05-1030
HT18-05-3050
HT18-05-5060
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
1-2.7
2.7-5.1
5.1-5.9
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
5.84
0.0584
--
--
3.62
0.0362
--
--
2.41
0.0241
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.03
0.43
0.43
0.00
0.13
3.59
3.59
0.01
0.10
4.02
4.02
0.01
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.09
1.49
1.49
0.003
0.50
13.81
13.81
0.031
0.22
9.13
9.13
0.020
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.03
0.46
0.46
0.001
0.56
15.47
15.47
0.032
0.22
9.13
9.13
0.019
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
1.16
1.16
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.03
0.57
0.57
0.00
0.60
16.57
16.57
0.028
0.30
12.45
12.45
0.021
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.26
4.45
4.45
0.01
1.60
44.20
44.20
0.05
1.20
49.79
49.79
0.06
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.28
4.79
4.79
0.00
1.20
33.15
33.15
0.03
0.83
34.44
34.44
0.04
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.42
7.19
7.19
0.007
1.20
33.15
33.15
0.034
1.10
45.64
45.64
0.047
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.31
5.31
5.31
0.01
0.87
24.03
24.03
0.02
0.82
34.02
34.02
0.04
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.31
5.31
5.31
0.005
0.68
18.78
18.78
0.02
0.83
34.44
34.44
0.03
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.38
6.51
6.51
0.01
1.30
35.91
35.91
0.037
1.10
45.64
45.64
0.047
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.17
2.91
2.91
0.003
0.83
22.93
22.93
0.02
0.69
28.63
28.63
0.03
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.39
6.68
6.68
0.01
2.30
63.54
63.54
0.08
1.40
58.09
58.09
0.08
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.20
3.42
3.42
0.01
1.70
46.96
46.96
0.07
0.79
32.78
32.78
0.05
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.34
14.11
14.11
0.01
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.09
1.61
1.61
0.00
0.68
18.78
18.78
0.03
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.23
3.94
3.94
"
1.10
30.39
30.39
--
0.83
34.44
34.44
--
C2-Naphthalenes
510
~
0.18
3.08
3.08
0.006
1.60
44.20
44.20
0.09
0.50
20.75
20.75
0.04
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
0.25
4.28
4.28
0.006
1.90
52.49
52.49
0.07
0.80
33.20
33.20
0.04
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.17
2.91
2.91
0.00
0.81
22.38
22.38
0.03
0.40
16.60
16.60
0.02
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.11
1.88
1.88
0.00
0.58
16.02
16.02
0.02
0.44
18.26
18.26
0.02
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.26
4.45
4.45
0.008
2.60
71.82
71.82
0.12
0.59
24.48
24.48
0.04
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.23
3.94
3.94
0.005
1.60
44.20
44.20
0.05
0.77
31.95
31.95
0.04
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.28
4.79
4.79
0.01
2.50
69.06
69.06
0.11
0.55
22.82
22.82
0.03
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.21
3.60
3.60
0.00
1.10
30.39
30.39
0.03
0.71
29.46
29.46
0.03
Chrysene
844
826
0.48
8.22
8.22
0.01
1.80
49.72
49.72
0.06
1.40
58.09
58.09
0.07
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.09
1.61
1.61
0.001
0.31
8.56
8.56
0.008
0.35
14.52
14.52
0.013
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.83
14.21
14.21
0.02
4.10
113.26
113.26
0.16
2.60
107.88
107.88
0.15
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.04
0.68
0.68
0.001
0.42
11.60
11.60
0.022
0.24
9.96
9.96
0.019
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.09
1.49
1.49
0.00
0.50
13.81
13.81
0.04
0.26
10.79
10.79
0.03
Perylene
967
431
0.09
1.58
1.58
0.00
0.32
8.84
8.84
0.01
0.28
11.62
11.62
0.01
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.38
6.51
6.51
0.01
3.00
82.87
82.87
0.14
1.80
74.69
74.69
0.13
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.67
11.47
11.47
0.02
3.50
96.69
96.69
0.14
2.10
87.14
87.14
0.13
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.16
--
--
--
1.55
--
--
--
1.29
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 10 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-06
HT18-06
HT18-06
Sample Name:
HT18-06-SURF
HT18-06-0010
HT18-06-1030
Sample Date:
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
ESBTU
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
4.76
0.0476
--
--
2.27
0.0227
--
--
4.62
0.0462
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.00
0.09
0.09
0.00
0.01
0.28
0.28
0.00
0.02
0.37
0.37
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.000
0.01
0.29
0.29
0.001
0.02
0.50
0.50
0.001
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.01
0.12
0.12
0.000
0.01
0.32
0.32
0.001
0.01
0.28
0.28
0.001
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.15
0.15
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.01
0.29
0.29
0.000
0.01
0.53
0.53
0.001
0.02
0.50
0.50
0.001
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.10
2.10
2.10
0.00
0.09
4.01
4.01
0.00
0.14
3.03
3.03
0.00
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.12
2.52
2.52
0.00
0.11
4.85
4.85
0.01
0.15
3.25
3.25
0.00
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.17
3.57
3.57
0.004
0.18
7.93
7.93
0.008
0.25
5.41
5.41
0.006
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.12
2.52
2.52
0.00
0.10
4.41
4.41
0.00
0.15
3.25
3.25
0.00
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.10
2.02
2.02
0.00
0.02
1.06
1.06
0.00
0.05
1.08
1.08
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.14
2.94
2.94
0.003
0.13
5.73
5.73
0.006
0.19
4.11
4.11
0.004
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.06
1.34
1.34
0.00
0.04
1.89
1.89
0.00
0.08
1.80
1.80
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.11
2.31
2.31
0.00
0.11
4.85
4.85
0.01
0.20
4.33
4.33
0.01
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.05
1.09
1.09
0.00
0.05
2.29
2.29
0.00
0.16
3.46
3.46
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
1.97
1.97
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.07
1.39
1.39
"
0.07
2.86
2.86
"
0.12
2.60
2.60
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
1.28
1.28
0.00
0.13
2.81
2.81
0.01
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.05
1.09
1.09
0.00
0.05
2.38
2.38
0.00
0.19
4.11
4.11
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.04
0.78
0.78
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.10
2.14
2.14
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
1.36
1.36
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
0.04
0.80
0.80
0.00
0.05
2.20
2.20
0.00
0.23
4.98
4.98
0.01
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.04
0.80
0.80
0.00
0.04
1.72
1.72
0.00
0.16
3.46
3.46
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.05
1.09
1.09
0.00
0.08
3.52
3.52
0.01
0.33
7.14
7.14
0.01
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
1.28
1.28
0.00
0.12
2.60
2.60
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.17
3.57
3.57
0.00
0.16
7.05
7.05
0.01
0.24
5.19
5.19
0.01
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.03
0.59
0.59
0.001
0.03
1.28
1.28
0.001
0.04
0.89
0.89
0.001
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.36
7.56
7.56
0.01
0.31
13.66
13.66
0.02
0.51
11.04
11.04
0.02
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.01
0.19
0.19
0.000
0.01
0.48
0.48
0.001
0.02
0.50
0.50
0.001
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.00
0.01
0.25
0.25
0.00
0.01
0.26
0.26
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.04
0.76
0.76
0.00
0.02
1.06
1.06
0.00
0.04
0.87
0.87
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.12
2.52
2.52
0.00
0.11
4.85
4.85
0.01
0.23
4.98
4.98
0.01
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.22
4.62
4.62
0.01
0.22
9.69
9.69
0.01
0.35
7.58
7.58
0.01
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.06
--
--
--
0.12
--
--
--
0.13
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 11 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT18-06
HT18-06
HT18-06
HT18-06-1030-FD
HT18-06-3060
HT18-06-6070
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
1-3
3-6
6-7.1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
3.25
0.0325
--
--
6.71
0.0671
--
--
1.61
0.0161
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.02
0.46
0.46
0.00
0.09
1.31
1.31
0.00
0.17
10.56
10.56
0.02
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.02
0.62
0.62
0.001
0.13
1.94
1.94
0.004
0.15
9.32
9.32
0.021
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.01
0.34
0.34
0.001
0.05
0.73
0.73
0.001
0.11
6.83
6.83
0.014
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.01
0.16
0.16
0.00
0.03
0.48
0.48
0.00
0.03
2.11
2.11
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.02
0.52
0.52
0.001
0.09
1.28
1.28
0.002
0.16
9.94
9.94
0.017
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.11
3.38
3.38
0.00
0.44
6.56
6.56
0.01
0.43
26.71
26.71
0.03
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.13
4.00
4.00
0.00
0.43
6.41
6.41
0.01
0.40
24.84
24.84
0.03
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.22
6.77
6.77
0.007
0.65
9.69
9.69
0.010
0.52
32.30
32.30
0.033
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.13
4.00
4.00
0.00
0.39
5.81
5.81
0.01
0.34
21.12
21.12
0.02
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.04
1.20
1.20
0.00
0.12
1.79
1.79
0.00
0.11
6.83
6.83
0.01
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.15
4.62
4.62
0.005
0.48
7.15
7.15
0.007
0.42
26.09
26.09
0.027
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.06
1.88
1.88
0.00
0.23
3.43
3.43
0.00
0.30
18.63
18.63
0.02
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.03
0.89
0.89
0.00
0.24
3.58
3.58
0.01
0.52
32.30
32.30
0.05
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.16
4.92
4.92
0.01
0.66
9.84
9.84
0.01
0.81
50.31
50.31
0.07
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
2.09
2.09
0.00
0.20
12.42
12.42
0.03
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.12
3.69
3.69
0.01
0.57
8.49
8.49
0.01
1.60
99.38
99.38
0.15
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.04
1.14
1.14
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.25
15.53
15.53
0.02
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.07
2.25
2.25
0.00
0.63
9.39
9.39
0.01
1.30
80.75
80.75
0.12
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.10
2.98
2.98
"
0.41
6.11
6.11
"
0.62
38.51
38.51
--
C2-Naphthalenes
510
~
0.11
3.38
3.38
0.01
0.80
11.92
11.92
0.02
2.50
155.28
155.28
0.30
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
0.15
4.62
4.62
0.01
0.80
11.92
11.92
0.02
2.20
136.65
136.65
0.18
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
8.70
8.70
0.01
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.08
2.58
2.58
0.00
0.60
8.94
8.94
0.01
1.50
93.17
93.17
0.12
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.06
1.91
1.91
0.00
0.22
3.28
3.28
0.00
0.50
31.06
31.06
0.03
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.19
5.85
5.85
0.01
1.40
20.86
20.86
0.04
4.60
285.71
285.71
0.49
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.13
4.00
4.00
0.00
0.54
8.05
8.05
0.01
1.70
105.59
105.59
0.13
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.28
8.62
8.62
0.01
1.90
28.32
28.32
0.04
4.50
279.50
279.50
0.43
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.10
3.08
3.08
0.00
0.32
4.77
4.77
0.01
1.20
74.53
74.53
0.08
Chrysene
844
826
0.20
6.15
6.15
0.01
0.68
10.13
10.13
0.01
0.60
37.27
37.27
0.04
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.03
0.98
0.98
0.001
0.10
1.48
1.48
0.001
0.09
5.34
5.34
0.005
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.40
12.31
12.31
0.02
1.50
22.35
22.35
0.03
1.40
86.96
86.96
0.12
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.02
0.62
0.62
0.001
0.11
1.64
1.64
0.003
0.20
12.42
12.42
0.023
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.01
0.34
0.34
0.00
0.03
0.37
0.37
0.00
0.11
6.83
6.83
0.02
Perylene
967
431
0.04
1.17
1.17
0.00
0.09
1.37
1.37
0.00
0.10
6.15
6.15
0.01
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.17
5.23
5.23
0.01
0.79
11.77
11.77
0.02
1.20
74.53
74.53
0.13
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.27
8.31
8.31
0.01
1.00
14.90
14.90
0.02
0.98
60.87
60.87
0.09
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.15
--
--
--
0.34
--
--
--
2.82
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 12 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-06
HT18-06
HT18-07
Sample Name:
HT18-06-7080
HT18-06-8010
HT18-07-SURF
Sample Date:
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
7.1-8.1
8.1-9.7
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
ESBTU
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
1.81
0.0181
--
--
4.22
0.0422
--
--
1.92
0.0192
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.49
27.07
27.07
0.06
0.45
10.66
10.66
0.02
0.00
0.14
0.14
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.55
30.39
30.39
0.068
0.55
13.03
13.03
0.029
0.00
0.17
0.17
0.000
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.13
7.18
7.18
0.015
0.15
3.55
3.55
0.007
0.01
0.30
0.30
0.001
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.05
2.65
2.65
0.01
0.05
1.16
1.16
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.16
8.84
8.84
0.015
0.15
3.55
3.55
0.006
0.02
1.04
1.04
0.002
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.46
25.41
25.41
0.03
0.47
11.14
11.14
0.01
0.08
4.32
4.32
0.01
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.37
20.44
20.44
0.02
0.39
9.24
9.24
0.01
0.08
4.01
4.01
0.00
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.55
30.39
30.39
0.031
0.54
12.80
12.80
0.013
0.11
5.73
5.73
0.006
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.35
19.34
19.34
0.02
0.34
8.06
8.06
0.01
0.08
3.91
3.91
0.00
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.10
5.52
5.52
0.01
0.10
2.37
2.37
0.00
0.05
2.81
2.81
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.40
22.10
22.10
0.023
0.42
9.95
9.95
0.010
0.09
4.74
4.74
0.005
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.51
28.18
28.18
0.03
0.46
10.90
10.90
0.01
0.03
1.61
1.61
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.72
39.78
39.78
0.07
0.56
13.27
13.27
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
1.10
60.77
60.77
0.08
1.00
23.70
23.70
0.03
0.09
4.43
4.43
0.01
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.69
38.12
38.12
0.09
0.63
14.93
14.93
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
2.40
132.60
132.60
0.20
2.20
52.13
52.13
0.08
0.05
2.34
2.34
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.44
24.31
24.31
0.02
0.38
9.00
9.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
1.70
93.92
93.92
0.14
1.30
30.81
30.81
0.04
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.96
53.04
53.04
--
0.78
18.48
18.48
--
0.05
2.55
2.55
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
4.10
226.52
226.52
0.44
4.30
101.90
101.90
0.20
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
3.40
187.85
187.85
0.25
3.20
75.83
75.83
0.10
0.04
2.08
2.08
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.21
11.60
11.60
0.01
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
1.90
104.97
104.97
0.14
1.40
33.18
33.18
0.04
0.03
1.41
1.41
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.70
38.67
38.67
0.04
0.69
16.35
16.35
0.02
0.03
1.30
1.30
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
6.50
359.12
359.12
0.62
6.50
154.03
154.03
0.27
0.03
1.77
1.77
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
2.70
149.17
149.17
0.18
2.70
63.98
63.98
0.08
0.03
1.56
1.56
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.10
5.30
5.30
0.00
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
6.30
348.07
348.07
0.53
6.40
151.66
151.66
0.23
0.04
1.98
1.98
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
--
1.90
104.97
104.97
0.11
1.90
45.02
45.02
0.05
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.70
38.67
38.67
0.05
0.70
16.59
16.59
0.02
0.12
6.25
6.25
0.01
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.10
5.25
5.25
0.005
0.08
1.97
1.97
0.002
0.02
1.04
1.04
0.001
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
1.50
82.87
82.87
0.12
1.70
40.28
40.28
0.06
0.27
14.06
14.06
0.02
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.22
12.15
12.15
0.023
0.22
5.21
5.21
0.010
0.01
0.52
0.52
0.001
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.14
7.73
7.73
0.02
0.04
1.02
1.02
0.00
0.00
0.16
0.16
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.09
5.19
5.19
0.01
0.09
2.09
2.09
0.00
0.02
1.20
1.20
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
1.30
71.82
71.82
0.12
1.40
33.18
33.18
0.06
0.12
6.25
6.25
0.01
Pyrene
697
9,090
1.00
55.25
55.25
0.08
1.30
30.81
30.81
0.04
0.18
9.38
9.38
0.01
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
3.50
--
--
--
1.47
--
--
--
0.11
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 13 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-07
HT18-07
HT18-07
Sample Name:
HT18-07-0020
HT18-07-2050
HT18-07-5070
Sample Date:
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-1.8
1.8-4.8
4.8-7
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
ESBTU
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
1.06
0.0106
--
--
5.94
0.0594
--
--
3.41
0.0341
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.01
1.04
1.04
0.00
0.11
1.85
1.85
0.00
0.15
4.40
4.40
0.01
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.01
1.32
1.32
0.003
0.06
1.08
1.08
0.002
0.15
4.40
4.40
0.010
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.03
2.45
2.45
0.005
0.08
1.30
1.30
0.003
0.07
2.14
2.14
0.004
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.79
0.79
0.00
0.03
0.91
0.91
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.05
4.91
4.91
0.008
0.12
2.02
2.02
0.003
0.11
3.23
3.23
0.005
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.22
20.75
20.75
0.02
0.49
8.25
8.25
0.01
0.40
11.73
11.73
0.01
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.19
17.92
17.92
0.02
0.42
7.07
7.07
0.01
0.35
10.26
10.26
0.01
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.24
22.64
22.64
0.023
0.54
9.09
9.09
0.009
0.46
13.49
13.49
0.014
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.15
14.15
14.15
0.01
0.35
5.89
5.89
0.01
0.28
8.21
8.21
0.01
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.04
4.15
4.15
0.00
0.10
1.67
1.67
0.00
0.09
2.55
2.55
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.20
18.87
18.87
0.019
0.49
8.25
8.25
0.008
0.34
9.97
9.97
0.010
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.09
8.21
8.21
0.01
0.61
10.27
10.27
0.01
0.33
9.68
9.68
0.01
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.30
5.05
5.05
0.01
0.23
6.74
6.74
0.01
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.25
23.58
23.58
0.03
1.20
20.20
20.20
0.03
0.75
21.99
21.99
0.03
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.21
6.16
6.16
0.01
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.18
16.98
16.98
0.03
1.80
30.30
30.30
0.05
1.20
35.19
35.19
0.05
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.47
7.91
7.91
0.01
0.28
8.21
8.21
0.01
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.10
18.52
18.52
0.03
0.71
20.82
20.82
0.03
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.14
13.21
13.21
--
1.00
16.84
16.84
--
0.56
16.42
16.42
--
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.12
11.32
11.32
0.02
1.90
31.99
31.99
0.06
1.80
52.79
52.79
0.10
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.21
19.81
19.81
0.03
3.60
60.61
60.61
0.08
2.00
58.65
58.65
0.08
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.30
5.05
5.05
0.00
0.15
4.40
4.40
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.10
9.34
9.34
0.01
1.30
21.89
21.89
0.03
0.81
23.75
23.75
0.03
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.96
16.16
16.16
0.02
0.47
13.78
13.78
0.01
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.25
23.58
23.58
0.04
4.00
67.34
67.34
0.12
2.90
85.04
85.04
0.15
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.17
16.04
16.04
0.02
3.40
57.24
57.24
0.07
1.80
52.79
52.79
0.06
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.28
26.42
26.42
0.04
4.70
79.12
79.12
0.12
3.20
93.84
93.84
0.14
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.12
11.32
11.32
0.01
2.50
42.09
42.09
0.05
1.20
35.19
35.19
0.04
Chrysene
844
826
0.28
26.42
26.42
0.03
0.74
12.46
12.46
0.01
0.57
16.72
16.72
0.02
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.05
4.25
4.25
0.004
0.09
1.57
1.57
0.001
0.08
2.20
2.20
0.002
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.69
65.09
65.09
0.09
1.50
25.25
25.25
0.04
1.30
38.12
38.12
0.05
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.03
2.92
2.92
0.005
0.12
2.02
2.02
0.004
0.11
3.23
3.23
0.006
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.37
0.37
0.00
0.03
0.76
0.76
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.05
4.53
4.53
0.00
0.11
1.85
1.85
0.00
0.08
2.40
2.40
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.38
35.85
35.85
0.06
0.93
15.66
15.66
0.03
0.92
26.98
26.98
0.05
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.54
50.94
50.94
0.07
1.10
18.52
18.52
0.03
0.93
27.27
27.27
0.04
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.64
--
--
--
0.82
--
--
--
1.01
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 14 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-07
HT18-08
HT18-08
Sample Name:
HT18-07-7090
HT18-08-SURF
HT18-08-0010
Sample Date:
10/29/2018
10/22/2018
10/23/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
7-8.9
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
ESBTU
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
4.66
0.0466
--
--
3.45
0.0345
--
--
3.59
0.0359
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.36
7.73
7.73
0.02
0.01
0.35
0.35
0.00
0.01
0.20
0.20
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.52
11.16
11.16
0.025
0.01
0.28
0.28
0.001
0.01
0.21
0.21
0.000
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.10
2.15
2.15
0.004
0.01
0.25
0.25
0.001
0.01
0.20
0.20
0.000
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.05
1.16
1.16
0.00
0.01
0.19
0.19
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.12
2.58
2.58
0.004
0.02
0.61
0.61
0.001
0.01
0.19
0.19
0.000
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.38
8.15
8.15
0.01
0.14
4.06
4.06
0.00
0.10
2.79
2.79
0.00
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.32
6.87
6.87
0.01
0.06
1.74
1.74
0.00
0.06
1.73
1.73
0.00
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.43
9.23
9.23
0.009
0.27
7.83
7.83
0.008
0.26
7.24
7.24
0.007
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.26
5.58
5.58
0.01
0.05
1.30
1.30
0.00
0.18
5.01
5.01
0.01
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.06
1.35
1.35
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.18
5.01
5.01
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.33
7.08
7.08
0.007
0.17
4.93
4.93
0.005
0.20
5.57
5.57
0.006
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.56
12.02
12.02
0.01
0.07
2.00
2.00
0.00
0.06
1.62
1.62
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.44
9.44
9.44
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
1.00
21.46
21.46
0.03
0.19
5.51
5.51
0.01
0.15
4.18
4.18
0.01
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.60
12.88
12.88
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
2.00
42.92
42.92
0.06
0.09
2.55
2.55
0.00
0.07
1.87
1.87
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.57
12.23
12.23
0.01
0.05
1.42
1.42
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
1.30
27.90
27.90
0.04
0.03
0.81
0.81
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
1.10
23.61
23.61
--
0.13
3.77
3.77
"
0.10
2.65
2.65
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
4.50
96.57
96.57
0.19
0.05
1.39
1.39
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
3.80
81.55
81.55
0.11
0.09
2.61
2.61
0.00
0.08
2.09
2.09
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.33
7.08
7.08
0.01
0.03
0.99
0.99
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
1.70
36.48
36.48
0.05
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
1.75
1.75
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
1.00
21.46
21.46
0.02
0.06
1.59
1.59
0.00
0.05
1.28
1.28
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
6.00
128.76
128.76
0.22
0.08
2.35
2.35
0.00
0.08
2.09
2.09
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
3.70
79.40
79.40
0.10
0.07
1.94
1.94
0.00
0.07
1.84
1.84
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.12
2.58
2.58
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
5.90
126.61
126.61
0.19
0.13
3.77
3.77
0.01
0.10
2.73
2.73
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
--
2.80
60.09
60.09
0.07
0.05
1.39
1.39
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.63
13.52
13.52
0.02
0.21
6.09
6.09
0.01
0.22
6.13
6.13
0.01
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.06
1.31
1.31
0.001
0.04
1.22
1.22
0.001
0.04
1.14
1.14
0.001
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
1.20
25.75
25.75
0.04
0.44
12.75
12.75
0.02
0.41
11.42
11.42
0.02
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.19
4.08
4.08
0.008
0.02
0.49
0.49
0.001
0.01
0.36
0.36
0.001
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.02
0.49
0.49
0.00
0.01
0.17
0.17
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.07
1.52
1.52
0.00
0.01
0.19
0.19
0.00
0.04
1.17
1.17
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
1.00
21.46
21.46
0.04
0.15
4.35
4.35
0.01
0.13
3.62
3.62
0.01
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.90
19.31
19.31
0.03
0.18
5.22
5.22
0.01
0.27
7.52
7.52
0.01
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
1.32
--
--
--
0.10
--
--
--
0.10
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 15 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-08
HT18-08
HT18-08
Sample Name:
HT18-08-1020
HT18-08-1020-FD
HT18-08-2045
Sample Date:
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
1-2.3
1-2.3
2.3-4.6
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
ESBTU
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
3.6
0.036
--
--
3.51
0.0351
--
--
4.94
0.0494
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.04
1.06
1.06
0.00
0.03
0.83
0.83
0.00
0.44
8.91
8.91
0.02
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.05
1.25
1.25
0.003
0.04
1.00
1.00
0.002
0.50
10.12
10.12
0.023
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.12
3.33
3.33
0.007
0.09
2.45
2.45
0.005
1.60
32.39
32.39
0.066
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.46
0.46
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.18
5.00
5.00
0.008
0.14
3.99
3.99
0.007
3.90
78.95
78.95
0.133
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.85
23.61
23.61
0.03
0.69
19.66
19.66
0.02
6.50
131.58
131.58
0.16
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.55
15.28
15.28
0.02
0.46
13.11
13.11
0.01
4.00
80.97
80.97
0.08
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.92
25.56
25.56
0.026
0.78
22.22
22.22
0.023
4.20
85.02
85.02
0.087
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.65
18.06
18.06
0.02
0.51
14.53
14.53
0.02
3.10
62.75
62.75
0.06
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.57
15.83
15.83
0.01
0.50
14.25
14.25
0.01
2.20
44.53
44.53
0.04
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.84
23.33
23.33
0.024
0.62
17.66
17.66
0.018
4.30
87.04
87.04
0.089
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.31
8.61
8.61
0.01
0.25
7.12
7.12
0.01
3.20
64.78
64.78
0.07
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.87
24.17
24.17
0.03
0.68
19.37
19.37
0.03
9.50
192.31
192.31
0.25
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.44
12.22
12.22
0.02
0.33
9.40
9.40
0.01
5.80
117.41
117.41
0.18
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.10
42.51
42.51
0.04
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.50
30.36
30.36
0.04
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.46
12.78
12.78
--
0.37
10.54
10.54
--
5.10
103.24
103.24
--
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
3.99
3.99
0.01
2.10
42.51
42.51
0.08
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.32
8.89
8.89
0.01
0.26
7.41
7.41
0.01
5.80
117.41
117.41
0.16
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.10
22.27
22.27
0.02
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
3.99
3.99
0.01
1.20
24.29
24.29
0.03
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
3.99
3.99
0.00
3.10
62.75
62.75
0.07
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.22
6.11
6.11
0.01
0.17
4.84
4.84
0.01
2.70
54.66
54.66
0.09
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.23
6.39
6.39
0.01
0.18
5.13
5.13
0.01
6.00
121.46
121.46
0.15
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.22
6.11
6.11
0.01
0.17
4.84
4.84
0.01
4.40
89.07
89.07
0.14
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
3.99
3.99
0.00
4.70
95.14
95.14
0.10
Chrysene
844
826
1.10
30.56
30.56
0.04
0.85
24.22
24.22
0.03
6.60
133.60
133.60
0.16
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.19
5.28
5.28
0.005
0.17
4.84
4.84
0.004
0.84
17.00
17.00
0.015
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
2.30
63.89
63.89
0.09
1.80
51.28
51.28
0.07
16.00
323.89
323.89
0.46
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.13
3.61
3.61
0.007
0.10
2.71
2.71
0.005
2.20
44.53
44.53
0.083
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.05
1.31
1.31
0.00
0.03
0.97
0.97
0.00
0.64
12.96
12.96
0.03
Perylene
967
431
0.21
5.83
5.83
0.01
0.17
4.84
4.84
0.01
1.10
22.27
22.27
0.02
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
1.40
38.89
38.89
0.07
0.93
26.50
26.50
0.04
16.00
323.89
323.89
0.54
Pyrene
697
9,090
1.70
47.22
47.22
0.07
1.30
37.04
37.04
0.05
14.00
283.40
283.40
0.41
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.53
--
--
--
0.44
--
--
--
3.83
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 16 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-08
HT18-08
HT18-09
Sample Name:
HT18-08-4565
HT18-08-6580
HT18-09-SURF
Sample Date:
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/22/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
4.6-6.5
6.5-8
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
ESBTU
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
3.33
0.0333
--
--
0.512
0.00512
--
--
4.15
0.0415
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.21
0.00
0.01
0.13
0.13
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.01
0.15
0.15
0.000
0.00
0.17
0.17
0.000
0.01
0.13
0.13
0.000
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.01
0.19
0.19
0.000
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.000
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.000
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.00
0.09
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
1.23
1.23
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.01
0.36
0.36
0.001
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.01
0.24
0.24
0.000
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.06
1.80
1.80
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.39
0.00
0.11
2.65
2.65
0.00
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.03
1.02
1.02
0.00
0.00
0.29
0.29
0.00
0.14
3.37
3.37
0.00
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.05
1.53
1.53
0.002
0.00
0.63
0.63
0.001
0.23
5.54
5.54
0.006
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.04
1.11
1.11
0.00
0.00
0.51
0.51
0.00
0.16
3.86
3.86
0.00
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.03
0.99
0.99
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
2.65
2.65
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.04
1.17
1.17
0.001
0.00
0.33
0.33
0.000
0.18
4.34
4.34
0.004
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.11
3.30
3.30
0.00
0.01
0.98
0.98
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.01
0.42
0.42
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.13
3.90
3.90
0.01
0.01
1.56
1.56
0.00
0.15
3.61
3.61
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.11
3.30
3.30
0.00
0.01
1.50
1.50
0.00
0.06
1.47
1.47
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.11
3.30
3.30
0.00
0.00
0.82
0.82
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.05
1.50
1.50
0.00
0.00
0.82
0.82
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.14
4.20
4.20
"
0.01
1.62
1.62
"
0.09
2.07
2.07
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.04
1.05
1.05
0.00
0.01
0.98
0.98
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.27
8.11
8.11
0.01
0.02
2.93
2.93
0.00
0.06
1.33
1.33
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.08
2.31
2.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.11
3.30
3.30
0.00
0.01
1.00
1.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.11
3.30
3.30
0.00
0.01
1.27
1.27
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.09
2.61
2.61
0.00
0.01
1.95
1.95
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.34
10.21
10.21
0.01
0.01
2.73
2.73
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.02
0.72
0.72
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.15
4.50
4.50
0.01
0.02
3.91
3.91
0.01
0.08
2.00
2.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.30
9.01
9.01
0.01
0.01
2.34
2.34
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.08
2.49
2.49
0.00
0.01
0.98
0.98
0.00
0.21
5.06
5.06
0.01
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.01
0.33
0.33
0.000
0.00
0.09
0.09
0.000
0.04
0.87
0.87
0.001
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.11
3.30
3.30
0.00
0.01
1.00
1.00
0.00
0.38
9.16
9.16
0.01
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.01
0.20
0.20
0.000
0.00
0.23
0.23
0.000
0.01
0.29
0.29
0.001
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.17
0.17
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.02
0.48
0.48
0.00
0.01
1.35
1.35
0.00
0.04
1.06
1.06
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.05
1.56
1.56
0.00
0.00
0.63
0.63
0.00
0.15
3.61
3.61
0.01
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.09
2.64
2.64
0.00
0.00
0.96
0.96
0.00
0.31
7.47
7.47
0.01
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.10
"
--
--
0.04
--
--
--
0.08
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 17 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT18-09
HT18-09
HT18-09
HT18-09-0010
HT18-09-1030
HT18-09-3050
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-1
1-3
3-5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
3.62
0.0362
--
--
2.92
0.0292
--
--
3
0.03
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.01
0.27
0.27
0.00
0.01
0.41
0.41
0.00
0.01
0.19
0.19
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.01
0.30
0.30
0.001
0.01
0.45
0.45
0.001
0.01
0.22
0.22
0.000
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.01
0.22
0.22
0.000
0.01
0.48
0.48
0.001
0.01
0.27
0.27
0.001
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.23
0.23
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.02
0.50
0.50
0.001
0.02
0.68
0.68
0.001
0.03
0.83
0.83
0.001
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.14
3.87
3.87
0.00
0.17
5.82
5.82
0.01
0.10
3.33
3.33
0.00
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.19
5.25
5.25
0.01
0.18
6.16
6.16
0.01
0.11
3.67
3.67
0.00
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.33
9.12
9.12
0.009
0.32
10.96
10.96
0.011
0.15
5.00
5.00
0.005
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.23
6.35
6.35
0.01
0.22
7.53
7.53
0.01
0.10
3.33
3.33
0.00
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.24
6.63
6.63
0.01
0.19
6.51
6.51
0.01
0.09
3.10
3.10
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.25
6.91
6.91
0.007
0.25
8.56
8.56
0.009
0.12
4.00
4.00
0.004
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.07
1.88
1.88
0.00
0.09
3.08
3.08
0.00
0.05
1.73
1.73
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.18
4.97
4.97
0.01
0.23
7.88
7.88
0.01
0.12
4.00
4.00
0.01
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.08
2.21
2.21
0.00
0.12
4.11
4.11
0.01
0.07
2.40
2.40
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.05
1.41
1.41
0.00
0.05
1.71
1.71
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
2.43
2.43
0.00
0.03
1.10
1.10
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.12
3.31
3.31
"
0.13
4.45
4.45
"
0.07
2.27
2.27
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.05
1.30
1.30
0.00
0.11
3.77
3.77
0.01
0.05
1.53
1.53
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
0.08
2.18
2.18
0.00
0.15
5.14
5.14
0.01
0.08
2.60
2.60
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
~
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.06
1.71
1.71
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
1.67
1.67
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.05
1.41
1.41
0.00
0.07
2.33
2.33
0.00
0.03
1.10
1.10
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
0.08
2.21
2.21
0.00
0.18
6.16
6.16
0.01
0.08
2.60
2.60
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.06
1.74
1.74
0.00
0.12
4.11
4.11
0.00
0.06
2.03
2.03
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.10
2.76
2.76
0.00
0.20
6.85
6.85
0.01
0.09
2.87
2.87
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
--
0.05
1.27
1.27
0.00
0.09
3.05
3.05
0.00
0.05
1.73
1.73
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.28
7.73
7.73
0.01
0.30
10.27
10.27
0.01
0.15
5.00
5.00
0.01
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.06
1.69
1.69
0.002
0.05
1.68
1.68
0.001
0.03
0.97
0.97
0.001
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.50
13.81
13.81
0.02
0.57
19.52
19.52
0.03
0.30
10.00
10.00
0.01
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.02
0.47
0.47
0.001
0.03
0.89
0.89
0.002
0.01
0.47
0.47
0.001
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.01
0.22
0.22
0.00
0.01
0.34
0.34
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.06
1.69
1.69
0.00
0.07
2.29
2.29
0.00
0.04
1.17
1.17
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.18
4.97
4.97
0.01
0.23
7.88
7.88
0.01
0.13
4.33
4.33
0.01
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.35
9.67
9.67
0.01
0.43
14.73
14.73
0.02
0.20
6.67
6.67
0.01
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.13
--
--
--
0.20
--
--
--
0.10
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 18 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT18-09
HT18-09
HT18-09
HT18-09-3050-FD
HT18-09-5070
HT18-09-7010
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
3-5
5-7
7-9.7
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
2.76
0.0276
--
--
3.76
0.0376
--
--
4.24
0.0424
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.02
0.65
0.65
0.00
0.03
0.72
0.72
0.00
0.13
3.07
3.07
0.01
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.02
0.80
0.80
0.002
0.04
0.98
0.98
0.002
0.16
3.77
3.77
0.008
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.04
1.34
1.34
0.003
0.02
0.53
0.53
0.001
0.06
1.51
1.51
0.003
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.01
0.36
0.36
0.00
0.02
0.43
0.43
0.00
0.04
0.94
0.94
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.07
2.57
2.57
0.004
0.05
1.28
1.28
0.002
0.16
3.77
3.77
0.006
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.32
11.59
11.59
0.01
0.21
5.59
5.59
0.01
0.52
12.26
12.26
0.01
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.32
11.59
11.59
0.01
0.24
6.38
6.38
0.01
0.49
11.56
11.56
0.01
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.45
16.30
16.30
0.017
0.35
9.31
9.31
0.010
0.70
16.51
16.51
0.017
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.29
10.51
10.51
0.01
0.24
6.38
6.38
0.01
0.47
11.08
11.08
0.01
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.27
9.78
9.78
0.01
0.23
6.12
6.12
0.01
0.29
6.84
6.84
0.01
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.32
11.59
11.59
0.012
0.28
7.45
7.45
0.008
0.51
12.03
12.03
0.012
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.13
4.71
4.71
0.01
0.13
3.46
3.46
0.00
0.39
9.20
9.20
0.01
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
2.10
2.10
0.00
0.40
9.43
9.43
0.02
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.35
12.68
12.68
0.02
0.28
7.45
7.45
0.01
0.88
20.75
20.75
0.03
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
4.72
4.72
0.01
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.22
7.97
7.97
0.01
0.22
5.85
5.85
0.01
1.40
33.02
33.02
0.05
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.07
2.64
2.64
0.00
0.06
1.70
1.70
0.00
0.38
8.96
8.96
0.01
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.11
3.99
3.99
0.01
0.25
6.65
6.65
0.01
1.10
25.94
25.94
0.04
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.22
7.97
7.97
"
0.19
5.05
5.05
"
0.74
17.45
17.45
--
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.13
4.71
4.71
0.01
0.27
7.18
7.18
0.01
1.70
40.09
40.09
0.08
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
0.22
7.97
7.97
0.01
0.29
7.71
7.71
0.01
2.10
49.53
49.53
0.07
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
~
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
4.72
4.72
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.17
6.16
6.16
0.01
0.30
7.98
7.98
0.01
1.50
35.38
35.38
0.05
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.10
3.48
3.48
0.00
0.09
2.42
2.42
0.00
0.58
13.68
13.68
0.01
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
0.21
7.61
7.61
0.01
0.45
11.97
11.97
0.02
3.50
82.55
82.55
0.14
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.17
6.16
6.16
0.01
0.22
5.85
5.85
0.01
1.80
42.45
42.45
0.05
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.24
8.70
8.70
0.01
0.46
12.23
12.23
0.02
3.90
91.98
91.98
0.14
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
--
0.14
5.07
5.07
0.01
0.20
5.32
5.32
0.01
1.50
35.38
35.38
0.04
Chrysene
844
826
0.44
15.94
15.94
0.02
0.34
9.04
9.04
0.01
0.77
18.16
18.16
0.02
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.09
3.15
3.15
0.003
0.07
1.76
1.76
0.002
0.12
2.83
2.83
0.003
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.92
33.33
33.33
0.05
0.69
18.35
18.35
0.03
1.50
35.38
35.38
0.05
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.05
1.88
1.88
0.004
0.05
1.22
1.22
0.002
0.14
3.30
3.30
0.006
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.02
0.83
0.83
0.00
0.01
0.27
0.27
0.00
0.05
1.27
1.27
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.10
3.62
3.62
0.00
0.07
1.81
1.81
0.00
0.15
3.54
3.54
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.50
18.12
18.12
0.03
0.32
8.51
8.51
0.01
0.95
22.41
22.41
0.04
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.64
23.19
23.19
0.03
0.46
12.23
12.23
0.02
1.10
25.94
25.94
0.04
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.34
--
--
--
0.25
--
--
--
0.98
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 19 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-10
HT18-10
HT18-11
Sample Name:
HT18-10-SURF
HT18-10-0010
HT18-11-SURF
Sample Date:
10/22/2018
10/24/2018
10/22/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1.1
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
ESBTU
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
0.234
0.00234
--
--
0.4
0.004
--
--
4.95
0.0495
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.01
2.86
2.86
0.01
0.00
0.28
0.28
0.00
0.01
0.20
0.20
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.01
2.78
2.78
0.006
0.00
0.28
0.28
0.001
0.01
0.15
0.15
0.000
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.05
20.51
20.51
0.042
0.00
1.13
1.13
0.002
0.01
0.22
0.22
0.000
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.04
18.80
18.80
0.04
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.00
0.01
0.11
0.11
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.10
42.31
42.31
0.071
0.00
0.83
0.83
0.001
0.02
0.38
0.38
0.001
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.20
85.47
85.47
0.10
0.01
3.50
3.50
0.00
0.12
2.42
2.42
0.00
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.07
28.63
28.63
0.03
0.01
3.00
3.00
0.00
0.08
1.68
1.68
0.00
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.14
59.83
59.83
0.061
0.02
4.75
4.75
0.005
0.23
4.65
4.65
0.005
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.04
15.81
15.81
0.02
0.01
3.50
3.50
0.00
0.07
1.49
1.49
0.00
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
2.75
2.75
0.00
0.02
0.40
0.40
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.11
47.01
47.01
0.048
0.02
3.75
3.75
0.004
0.15
3.03
3.03
0.003
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.08
35.90
35.90
0.04
0.02
5.00
5.00
0.01
0.06
1.21
1.21
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.25
106.84
106.84
0.14
0.03
7.50
7.50
0.01
0.15
3.03
3.03
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.19
81.20
81.20
0.12
0.02
5.25
5.25
0.01
0.09
1.78
1.78
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.05
20.51
20.51
0.02
0.02
4.75
4.75
0.00
0.04
0.71
0.71
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.83
1.83
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.11
47.01
47.01
--
0.03
7.00
7.00
"
0.11
2.22
2.22
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.06
27.35
27.35
0.05
0.01
2.10
2.10
0.00
0.04
0.85
0.85
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.13
55.56
55.56
0.07
0.04
9.50
9.50
0.01
0.08
1.70
1.70
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
2.30
2.30
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
4.00
4.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.05
20.51
20.51
0.02
0.03
6.25
6.25
0.01
0.04
0.89
0.89
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.08
33.76
33.76
0.06
0.02
5.00
5.00
0.01
0.07
1.39
1.39
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.06
26.50
26.50
0.03
0.04
10.75
10.75
0.01
0.06
1.21
1.21
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.07
31.62
31.62
0.05
0.03
6.50
6.50
0.01
0.11
2.22
2.22
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
8.50
8.50
0.01
0.04
0.79
0.79
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.17
72.65
72.65
0.09
0.02
5.50
5.50
0.01
0.19
3.84
3.84
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.03
11.54
11.54
0.010
0.00
0.95
0.95
0.001
0.04
0.79
0.79
0.001
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.43
183.76
183.76
0.26
0.04
9.50
9.50
0.01
0.37
7.47
7.47
0.01
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.06
26.07
26.07
0.048
0.00
0.70
0.70
0.001
0.02
0.36
0.36
0.001
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.00
1.97
1.97
0.01
0.00
0.35
0.35
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.09
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.01
4.27
4.27
0.00
0.01
3.50
3.50
0.00
0.02
0.34
0.34
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.36
153.85
153.85
0.26
0.02
5.50
5.50
0.01
0.16
3.23
3.23
0.01
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.24
102.56
102.56
0.15
0.03
7.25
7.25
0.01
0.20
4.04
4.04
0.01
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
1.83
--
--
--
0.17
--
--
--
0.07
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 20 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT18-11
HT18-11
HT18-11
HT18-11-0010
HT18-11-1030
HT18-11-3050
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-1
1-3
3-5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
3.23
0.0323
--
--
3.29
0.0329
--
--
1.63
0.0163
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.01
0.16
0.16
0.00
0.01
0.36
0.36
0.00
0.01
0.40
0.40
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.01
0.18
0.18
0.000
0.01
0.36
0.36
0.001
0.01
0.38
0.38
0.001
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.02
0.56
0.56
0.001
0.02
0.52
0.52
0.001
0.01
0.74
0.74
0.001
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.27
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.29
0.29
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.01
0.25
0.25
0.000
0.03
1.00
1.00
0.002
0.02
1.29
1.29
0.002
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.06
1.98
1.98
0.00
0.19
5.78
5.78
0.01
0.11
6.75
6.75
0.01
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.09
2.69
2.69
0.00
0.20
6.08
6.08
0.01
0.11
6.75
6.75
0.01
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.15
4.64
4.64
0.005
0.28
8.51
8.51
0.009
0.13
7.98
7.98
0.008
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.10
3.10
3.10
0.00
0.19
5.78
5.78
0.01
0.10
5.83
5.83
0.01
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.09
2.91
2.91
0.00
0.18
5.47
5.47
0.00
0.08
5.03
5.03
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.12
3.72
3.72
0.004
0.24
7.29
7.29
0.007
0.12
7.36
7.36
0.008
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.03
0.93
0.93
0.00
0.09
2.67
2.67
0.00
0.07
4.05
4.05
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.09
2.63
2.63
0.00
0.23
6.99
6.99
0.01
0.14
8.59
8.59
0.01
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.04
1.27
1.27
0.00
0.14
4.26
4.26
0.01
0.09
5.21
5.21
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.02
0.71
0.71
0.00
0.05
1.58
1.58
0.00
0.03
1.84
1.84
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.02
0.74
0.74
0.00
0.07
2.25
2.25
0.00
0.04
2.15
2.15
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.06
1.70
1.70
"
0.14
4.26
4.26
"
0.08
5.03
5.03
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.02
0.74
0.74
0.00
0.09
2.80
2.80
0.01
0.05
2.94
2.94
0.01
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
0.04
1.27
1.27
0.00
0.15
4.56
4.56
0.01
0.10
6.07
6.07
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
~
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
3.34
3.34
0.00
0.06
3.44
3.44
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.03
0.80
0.80
0.00
0.07
2.22
2.22
0.00
0.04
2.64
2.64
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
0.04
1.21
1.21
0.00
0.16
4.86
4.86
0.01
0.09
5.46
5.46
0.01
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.03
0.93
0.93
0.00
0.12
3.65
3.65
0.00
0.09
5.28
5.28
0.01
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.05
1.49
1.49
0.00
0.15
4.56
4.56
0.01
0.10
6.13
6.13
0.01
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
--
0.02
0.65
0.65
0.00
0.10
3.04
3.04
0.00
0.07
4.05
4.05
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.13
4.02
4.02
0.00
0.28
8.51
8.51
0.01
0.15
9.20
9.20
0.01
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.03
0.84
0.84
0.001
0.06
1.70
1.70
0.002
0.03
1.72
1.72
0.002
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.24
7.43
7.43
0.01
0.57
17.33
17.33
0.02
0.29
17.79
17.79
0.03
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.01
0.24
0.24
0.000
0.03
0.85
0.85
0.002
0.02
1.04
1.04
0.002
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.01
0.17
0.17
0.00
0.01
0.33
0.33
0.00
0.01
0.35
0.35
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.03
0.87
0.87
0.00
0.06
1.88
1.88
0.00
0.05
2.76
2.76
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.09
2.69
2.69
0.00
0.27
8.21
8.21
0.01
0.15
9.20
9.20
0.02
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.17
5.26
5.26
0.01
0.38
11.55
11.55
0.02
0.22
13.50
13.50
0.02
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.07
--
--
--
0.18
--
--
--
0.20
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 21 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-11
HT18-11
HT18-12
Sample Name:
HT18-11-5070
HT18-11-7010
HT18-12-SURF
Sample Date:
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/22/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
5-7
7-9.4
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
ESBTU
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
wt.
jig/goc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
1.02
0.0102
--
--
0.559
0.00559
--
--
2.75
0.0275
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.00
0.08
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.20
0.00
0.01
0.51
0.51
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.000
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.000
0.01
0.47
0.47
0.001
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.02
0.69
0.69
0.001
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.55
0.55
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.04
1.45
1.45
0.002
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.00
0.24
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.22
8.00
8.00
0.01
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.00
0.22
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.00
0.11
4.00
4.00
0.00
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.00
0.36
0.36
0.000
0.00
0.32
0.32
0.000
0.25
9.09
9.09
0.009
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.00
0.25
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.29
0.29
0.00
0.08
3.05
3.05
0.00
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.00
0.24
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.69
0.69
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.15
0.15
0.000
0.19
6.91
6.91
0.007
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
4.00
4.00
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.01
0.53
0.53
0.00
0.00
0.77
0.77
0.00
0.26
9.45
9.45
0.01
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.00
0.46
0.46
0.00
0.01
0.97
0.97
0.00
0.16
5.82
5.82
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
2.22
2.22
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.00
0.42
0.42
"
0.00
0.84
0.84
"
0.17
6.18
6.18
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.86
0.86
0.00
0.07
2.62
2.62
0.01
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.01
0.71
0.71
0.00
0.01
1.66
1.66
0.00
0.16
5.82
5.82
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
2.80
2.80
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.01
0.66
0.66
0.00
0.01
1.97
1.97
0.00
0.12
4.36
4.36
0.01
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.01
0.59
0.59
0.00
0.01
1.34
1.34
0.00
0.12
4.36
4.36
0.01
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.01
0.93
0.93
0.00
0.02
3.04
3.04
0.00
0.16
5.82
5.82
0.01
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.00
0.45
0.45
0.00
0.01
1.11
1.11
0.00
0.08
2.84
2.84
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.00
0.42
0.42
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.00
0.24
8.73
8.73
0.01
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.00
0.05
0.05
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.05
1.64
1.64
0.001
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.01
0.69
0.69
0.00
0.00
0.48
0.48
0.00
0.55
20.00
20.00
0.03
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.000
0.00
0.15
0.15
0.000
0.03
1.24
1.24
0.002
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.00
0.01
0.40
0.40
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.01
1.18
1.18
0.00
0.02
4.29
4.29
0.00
0.02
0.73
0.73
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.00
0.37
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.43
0.43
0.00
0.26
9.45
9.45
0.02
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.01
0.55
0.55
0.00
0.00
0.43
0.43
0.00
0.31
11.27
11.27
0.02
--
ESBTU FCVi
"
--
--
0.01
"
--
--
0.03
--
--
--
0.18
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 22 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT18-12
HT18-12
HT18-12
HT18-12-SURF-FD
HT18-12-0010
HT18-12-1030
10/22/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
2.74
0.0274
--
--
3.17
0.0317
--
--
4.17
0.0417
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.01
0.51
0.51
0.00
0.03
1.01
1.01
0.00
0.07
1.63
1.63
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.01
0.51
0.51
0.001
0.03
1.01
1.01
0.002
0.09
2.11
2.11
0.005
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.02
0.73
0.73
0.001
0.06
1.96
1.96
0.004
0.19
4.56
4.56
0.009
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.01
0.44
0.44
0.00
0.02
0.69
0.69
0.00
0.07
1.58
1.58
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.05
1.90
1.90
0.003
0.18
5.68
5.68
0.010
0.28
6.71
6.71
0.011
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.23
8.39
8.39
0.01
0.62
19.56
19.56
0.02
1.20
28.78
28.78
0.03
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.08
2.74
2.74
0.00
0.48
15.14
15.14
0.02
0.79
18.94
18.94
0.02
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.26
9.49
9.49
0.010
0.55
17.35
17.35
0.018
1.20
28.78
28.78
0.029
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.05
1.72
1.72
0.00
0.40
12.62
12.62
0.01
0.87
20.86
20.86
0.02
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.01
0.19
0.19
0.00
0.31
9.78
9.78
0.01
0.67
16.07
16.07
0.01
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.20
7.30
7.30
0.007
0.46
14.51
14.51
0.015
1.00
23.98
23.98
0.024
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.12
4.38
4.38
0.00
0.27
8.52
8.52
0.01
0.77
18.47
18.47
0.02
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.27
9.85
9.85
0.01
0.64
20.19
20.19
0.03
1.70
40.77
40.77
0.05
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.16
5.84
5.84
0.01
0.52
16.40
16.40
0.02
1.50
35.97
35.97
0.05
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.06
2.34
2.34
0.00
0.18
5.68
5.68
0.01
0.66
15.83
15.83
0.02
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.16
5.05
5.05
0.01
0.60
14.39
14.39
0.02
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.17
6.20
6.20
"
0.47
14.83
14.83
--
1.30
31.18
31.18
--
C2-Naphthalenes
510
~
0.08
2.81
2.81
0.01
0.20
6.31
6.31
0.01
0.74
17.75
17.75
0.03
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
0.16
5.84
5.84
0.01
0.51
16.09
16.09
0.02
2.30
55.16
55.16
0.07
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.48
11.51
11.51
0.01
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.07
2.70
2.70
0.00
0.29
9.15
9.15
0.01
1.10
26.38
26.38
0.03
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.07
2.66
2.66
0.00
0.22
6.94
6.94
0.01
1.00
23.98
23.98
0.03
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.13
4.74
4.74
0.01
0.36
11.36
11.36
0.02
1.70
40.77
40.77
0.07
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.12
4.38
4.38
0.01
0.45
14.20
14.20
0.02
2.60
62.35
62.35
0.08
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.14
5.11
5.11
0.01
0.46
14.51
14.51
0.02
2.10
50.36
50.36
0.08
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.09
3.43
3.43
0.00
0.36
11.36
11.36
0.01
2.20
52.76
52.76
0.06
Chrysene
844
826
0.26
9.49
9.49
0.01
0.67
21.14
21.14
0.03
1.50
35.97
35.97
0.04
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.06
2.08
2.08
0.002
0.11
3.47
3.47
0.003
0.25
6.00
6.00
0.005
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.53
19.34
19.34
0.03
1.50
47.32
47.32
0.07
3.00
71.94
71.94
0.10
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.04
1.28
1.28
0.002
0.07
2.27
2.27
0.004
0.19
4.56
4.56
0.008
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.01
0.51
0.51
0.00
0.03
0.88
0.88
0.00
0.08
1.92
1.92
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.01
0.29
0.29
0.00
0.15
4.73
4.73
0.00
0.29
6.95
6.95
0.01
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.26
9.49
9.49
0.02
0.96
30.28
30.28
0.05
1.90
45.56
45.56
0.08
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.25
9.12
9.12
0.01
1.20
37.85
37.85
0.05
2.40
57.55
57.55
0.08
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.18
--
--
--
0.52
--
--
--
1.11
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 23 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT18-12
HT18-12
HT18-12
HT18-12-3050
HT18-12-5070
HT18-12-7010
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
3-5
5-7
7-9.7
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
1.76
0.0176
--
--
1.73
0.0173
--
--
0.797
0.00797
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.22
12.50
12.50
0.03
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.15
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.08
4.49
4.49
0.010
0.00
0.04
0.04
0.000
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.000
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.33
18.75
18.75
0.038
0.01
0.35
0.35
0.001
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.05
2.90
2.90
0.01
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.35
19.89
19.89
0.033
0.00
0.25
0.25
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
1.20
68.18
68.18
0.08
0.02
0.98
0.98
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.49
27.84
27.84
0.03
0.01
0.46
0.46
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
1.00
56.82
56.82
0.058
0.02
0.92
0.92
0.001
0.00
0.20
0.20
0.000
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.73
41.48
41.48
0.04
0.01
0.64
0.64
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.15
0.00
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.56
31.82
31.82
0.03
0.01
0.58
0.58
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.88
50.00
50.00
0.051
0.01
0.75
0.75
0.001
0.00
0.09
0.09
0.000
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.51
28.98
28.98
0.03
0.01
0.52
0.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
1.50
85.23
85.23
0.11
0.02
1.27
1.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
1.20
68.18
68.18
0.10
0.02
0.98
0.98
0.00
0.01
0.65
0.65
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.31
17.61
17.61
0.02
0.01
0.29
0.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.86
48.86
48.86
--
0.01
0.75
0.75
"
0.00
0.55
0.55
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
~
0.78
44.32
44.32
0.09
0.01
0.64
0.64
0.00
0.00
0.61
0.61
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
0.92
52.27
52.27
0.07
0.02
1.04
1.04
0.00
0.01
1.04
1.04
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.34
19.32
19.32
0.03
0.01
0.35
0.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.36
20.45
20.45
0.02
0.01
0.35
0.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.65
36.93
36.93
0.06
0.01
0.81
0.81
0.00
0.01
1.38
1.38
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.64
36.36
36.36
0.04
0.02
0.92
0.92
0.00
0.01
0.88
0.88
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.45
25.57
25.57
0.04
0.01
0.75
0.75
0.00
0.02
2.01
2.01
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.50
28.41
28.41
0.03
0.01
0.75
0.75
0.00
0.01
0.66
0.66
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
1.30
73.86
73.86
0.09
0.02
1.10
1.10
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.31
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.21
11.93
11.93
0.011
0.00
0.18
0.18
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
3.20
181.82
181.82
0.26
0.05
2.60
2.60
0.00
0.00
0.28
0.28
0.00
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.46
26.14
26.14
0.049
0.00
0.21
0.21
0.000
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.000
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.12
6.82
6.82
0.02
0.00
0.05
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.21
11.93
11.93
0.01
0.02
1.04
1.04
0.00
0.02
2.89
2.89
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
3.10
176.14
176.14
0.30
0.03
1.97
1.97
0.00
0.00
0.28
0.28
0.00
Pyrene
697
9,090
2.60
147.73
147.73
0.21
0.03
1.85
1.85
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.24
0.00
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
1.96
--
--
--
0.03
"
--
--
0.02
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 24 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT18-13
HT18-13
HT18-13
HT18-13-SURF
HT18-13-0010
HT18-13-1030
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
3.32
0.0332
--
--
3.89
0.0389
--
--
4.07
0.0407
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.00
0.09
0.09
0.00
0.02
0.41
0.41
0.00
0.03
0.69
0.69
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.00
0.09
0.09
0.000
0.02
0.57
0.57
0.001
0.04
0.86
0.86
0.002
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.00
0.09
0.09
0.000
0.04
1.05
1.05
0.002
0.06
1.45
1.45
0.003
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.00
0.02
0.59
0.59
0.00
0.04
0.88
0.88
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.01
0.20
0.20
0.000
0.07
1.80
1.80
0.003
0.10
2.46
2.46
0.004
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.05
1.45
1.45
0.00
0.38
9.77
9.77
0.01
0.51
12.53
12.53
0.01
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.05
1.60
1.60
0.00
0.36
9.25
9.25
0.01
0.45
11.06
11.06
0.01
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.09
2.71
2.71
0.003
0.42
10.80
10.80
0.011
0.59
14.50
14.50
0.015
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.06
1.87
1.87
0.00
0.28
7.20
7.20
0.01
0.38
9.34
9.34
0.01
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.05
1.51
1.51
0.00
0.07
1.77
1.77
0.00
0.11
2.70
2.70
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.07
2.11
2.11
0.002
0.40
10.28
10.28
0.010
0.39
9.58
9.58
0.010
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.03
0.90
0.90
0.00
0.28
7.20
7.20
0.01
0.51
12.53
12.53
0.01
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
2.11
2.11
0.00
0.14
3.44
3.44
0.01
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.06
1.69
1.69
0.00
0.65
16.71
16.71
0.02
1.00
24.57
24.57
0.03
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.03
0.93
0.93
0.00
0.55
14.14
14.14
0.02
1.00
24.57
24.57
0.04
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.02
0.51
0.51
0.00
0.17
4.37
4.37
0.00
0.37
9.09
9.09
0.01
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.28
7.20
7.20
0.01
0.56
13.76
13.76
0.02
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.04
1.05
1.05
"
0.44
11.31
11.31
"
0.83
20.39
20.39
--
C2-Naphthalenes
510
~
0.02
0.45
0.45
0.00
0.22
5.66
5.66
0.01
0.38
9.34
9.34
0.02
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
0.03
0.93
0.93
0.00
1.10
28.28
28.28
0.04
2.30
56.51
56.51
0.08
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.10
2.57
2.57
0.00
0.22
5.41
5.41
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.02
0.57
0.57
0.00
0.43
11.05
11.05
0.01
1.00
24.57
24.57
0.03
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.02
0.48
0.48
0.00
0.35
9.00
9.00
0.01
0.79
19.41
19.41
0.02
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.03
0.81
0.81
0.00
0.82
21.08
21.08
0.04
1.20
29.48
29.48
0.05
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.02
0.69
0.69
0.00
1.10
28.28
28.28
0.03
2.50
61.43
61.43
0.07
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.04
1.08
1.08
0.00
1.30
33.42
33.42
0.05
2.10
51.60
51.60
0.08
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.02
0.45
0.45
0.00
0.80
20.57
20.57
0.02
1.90
46.68
46.68
0.05
Chrysene
844
826
0.09
2.62
2.62
0.00
0.52
13.37
13.37
0.02
0.71
17.44
17.44
0.02
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.01
0.42
0.42
0.000
0.08
2.01
2.01
0.002
0.10
2.46
2.46
0.002
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.18
5.42
5.42
0.01
1.10
28.28
28.28
0.04
1.40
34.40
34.40
0.05
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.01
0.16
0.16
0.000
0.07
1.70
1.70
0.003
0.09
2.19
2.19
0.004
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.00
0.09
0.09
0.00
0.01
0.36
0.36
0.00
0.03
0.64
0.64
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.02
0.54
0.54
0.00
0.09
2.24
2.24
0.00
0.11
2.70
2.70
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.05
1.63
1.63
0.00
0.55
14.14
14.14
0.02
0.70
17.20
17.20
0.03
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.10
3.01
3.01
0.00
0.85
21.85
21.85
0.03
1.10
27.03
27.03
0.04
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.05
--
--
--
0.46
--
--
--
0.73
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 25 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-13
HT18-13
HT18-13
Sample Name:
HT18-13-3050
HT18-13-5060
HT18-13-6090
Sample Date:
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
3-5
5-6.3
6.3-8.8
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
ESBTU
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
2.09
0.0209
--
--
1.63
0.0163
--
--
1.06
0.0106
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.03
1.29
1.29
0.00
0.01
0.74
0.74
0.00
0.01
0.47
0.47
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.03
1.58
1.58
0.004
0.02
1.10
1.10
0.002
0.01
0.72
0.72
0.002
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.05
2.54
2.54
0.005
0.03
1.66
1.66
0.003
0.02
1.70
1.70
0.003
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.03
1.29
1.29
0.00
0.01
0.67
0.67
0.00
0.00
0.32
0.32
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.11
5.26
5.26
0.009
0.06
3.37
3.37
0.006
0.02
1.98
1.98
0.003
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.43
20.57
20.57
0.02
0.21
12.88
12.88
0.02
0.06
5.75
5.75
0.01
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.35
16.75
16.75
0.02
0.18
11.04
11.04
0.01
0.04
3.40
3.40
0.00
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.44
21.05
21.05
0.022
0.20
12.27
12.27
0.013
0.06
5.57
5.57
0.006
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.28
13.40
13.40
0.01
0.15
9.20
9.20
0.01
0.04
4.15
4.15
0.00
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.06
2.82
2.82
0.00
0.04
2.58
2.58
0.00
0.03
2.45
2.45
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.38
18.18
18.18
0.019
0.19
11.66
11.66
0.012
0.05
4.62
4.62
0.005
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.68
32.54
32.54
0.04
0.30
18.40
18.40
0.02
0.11
10.38
10.38
0.01
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.12
5.74
5.74
0.01
0.05
3.13
3.13
0.01
0.02
2.08
2.08
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
1.00
47.85
47.85
0.06
0.51
31.29
31.29
0.04
0.14
13.21
13.21
0.02
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.98
46.89
46.89
0.07
0.37
22.70
22.70
0.03
0.16
15.09
15.09
0.02
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.65
31.10
31.10
0.03
0.24
14.72
14.72
0.01
0.09
8.40
8.40
0.01
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.39
18.66
18.66
0.03
0.15
9.20
9.20
0.01
0.06
5.66
5.66
0.01
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
1.00
47.85
47.85
--
0.45
27.61
27.61
--
0.15
14.15
14.15
--
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.37
17.70
17.70
0.03
0.18
11.04
11.04
0.02
0.08
7.45
7.45
0.01
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
2.20
105.26
105.26
0.14
0.69
42.33
42.33
0.06
0.30
28.30
28.30
0.04
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.36
17.22
17.22
0.02
0.16
9.82
9.82
0.01
0.06
5.75
5.75
0.01
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.63
30.14
30.14
0.04
0.24
14.72
14.72
0.02
0.12
11.32
11.32
0.01
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.93
44.50
44.50
0.05
0.40
24.54
24.54
0.03
0.13
12.26
12.26
0.01
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.98
46.89
46.89
0.08
0.40
24.54
24.54
0.04
0.17
16.04
16.04
0.03
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
2.60
124.40
124.40
0.15
0.81
49.69
49.69
0.06
0.35
33.02
33.02
0.04
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.17
8.13
8.13
0.01
0.07
4.17
4.17
0.00
0.02
2.08
2.08
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
1.50
71.77
71.77
0.11
0.53
32.52
32.52
0.05
0.20
18.87
18.87
0.03
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
2.20
105.26
105.26
0.12
0.71
43.56
43.56
0.05
0.31
29.25
29.25
0.03
Chrysene
844
826
0.59
28.23
28.23
0.03
0.26
15.95
15.95
0.02
0.08
7.83
7.83
0.01
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.08
3.92
3.92
0.003
0.04
2.33
2.33
0.002
0.01
0.90
0.90
0.001
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
1.10
52.63
52.63
0.07
0.48
29.45
29.45
0.04
0.20
18.87
18.87
0.03
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.08
3.97
3.97
0.007
0.04
2.70
2.70
0.005
0.03
2.36
2.36
0.004
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.02
1.05
1.05
0.00
0.01
0.74
0.74
0.00
0.00
0.45
0.45
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.08
3.97
3.97
0.00
0.04
2.58
2.58
0.00
0.01
1.04
1.04
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.57
27.27
27.27
0.05
0.28
17.18
17.18
0.03
0.16
15.09
15.09
0.03
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.79
37.80
37.80
0.05
0.41
25.15
25.15
0.04
0.13
12.26
12.26
0.02
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
1.28
--
--
--
0.65
--
--
--
0.40
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 26 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-13
HT18-13
HT18-14
Sample Name:
HT18-13-6090-FD
HT18-13-9010
HT18-14-SURF
Sample Date:
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
6.3-8.8
8.8-10
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
ESBTU
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
0.811
0.00811
--
--
0.546
0.00546
--
--
1.73
0.0173
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.01
0.73
0.73
0.00
0.00
0.64
0.64
0.00
0.00
0.23
0.23
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.01
1.17
1.17
0.003
0.00
0.55
0.55
0.001
0.01
0.29
0.29
0.001
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.02
2.59
2.59
0.005
0.01
2.56
2.56
0.005
0.01
0.49
0.49
0.001
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.00
0.58
0.58
0.00
0.00
0.57
0.57
0.00
0.01
0.31
0.31
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.03
3.58
3.58
0.006
0.03
5.68
5.68
0.010
0.03
1.56
1.56
0.003
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.09
10.60
10.60
0.01
0.08
14.10
14.10
0.02
0.17
9.83
9.83
0.01
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.06
7.64
7.64
0.01
0.07
11.90
11.90
0.01
0.10
5.78
5.78
0.01
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.09
10.85
10.85
0.011
0.07
12.45
12.45
0.013
0.18
10.40
10.40
0.011
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.06
7.52
7.52
0.01
0.04
7.69
7.69
0.01
0.12
6.94
6.94
0.01
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.04
4.44
4.44
0.00
0.01
1.83
1.83
0.00
0.08
4.80
4.80
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.07
8.26
8.26
0.008
0.06
11.54
11.54
0.012
0.15
8.67
8.67
0.009
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.16
19.73
19.73
0.02
0.04
6.41
6.41
0.01
0.07
4.28
4.28
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.03
3.45
3.45
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.19
23.43
23.43
0.03
0.10
17.58
17.58
0.02
0.16
9.25
9.25
0.01
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.21
25.89
25.89
0.04
0.07
12.09
12.09
0.02
0.08
4.34
4.34
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.15
18.50
18.50
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
1.79
1.79
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.08
9.74
9.74
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.20
24.66
24.66
--
0.04
7.69
7.69
--
0.08
4.68
4.68
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.10
12.21
12.21
0.02
0.02
3.66
3.66
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.41
50.55
50.55
0.07
0.05
8.79
8.79
0.01
0.05
2.89
2.89
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.09
11.22
11.22
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.16
19.73
19.73
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.15
18.50
18.50
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
2.08
2.08
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.21
25.89
25.89
0.04
0.03
5.49
5.49
0.01
0.03
1.50
1.50
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.49
60.42
60.42
0.07
0.03
4.95
4.95
0.01
0.03
1.68
1.68
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.03
3.70
3.70
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.26
32.06
32.06
0.05
0.04
6.41
6.41
0.01
0.03
1.50
1.50
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.43
53.02
53.02
0.06
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.12
14.80
14.80
0.02
0.08
14.47
14.47
0.02
0.19
10.98
10.98
0.01
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.01
1.60
1.60
0.001
0.01
2.56
2.56
0.002
0.04
2.02
2.02
0.002
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.28
34.53
34.53
0.05
0.20
36.63
36.63
0.05
0.40
23.12
23.12
0.03
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.03
3.70
3.70
0.007
0.02
3.11
3.11
0.006
0.02
0.92
0.92
0.002
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.01
0.75
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.71
0.71
0.00
0.01
0.46
0.46
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.02
2.10
2.10
0.00
0.03
5.31
5.31
0.01
0.04
2.14
2.14
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.19
23.43
23.43
0.04
0.13
23.81
23.81
0.04
0.15
8.67
8.67
0.01
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.18
22.19
22.19
0.03
0.15
27.47
27.47
0.04
0.28
16.18
16.18
0.02
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.70
--
--
--
0.34
--
--
--
0.18
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 27 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT18-14
HT18-14
HT18-15
HT18-14-0010
HT18-14-1020
HT18-15-SURF
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/24/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-1.3
1.3-1.9
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
2.13
0.0213
--
--
1.28
0.0128
--
--
1.33
0.0133
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.56
26.29
26.29
0.06
0.02
1.56
1.56
0.00
0.06
4.59
4.59
0.01
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.84
39.44
39.44
0.088
0.09
6.88
6.88
0.015
0.07
4.96
4.96
0.011
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.68
31.92
31.92
0.065
0.10
7.81
7.81
0.016
0.18
13.53
13.53
0.028
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.42
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.94
0.94
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
1.10
51.64
51.64
0.087
0.12
9.38
9.38
0.016
0.31
23.31
23.31
0.039
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
2.80
131.46
131.46
0.16
0.36
28.13
28.13
0.03
0.48
36.09
36.09
0.04
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
2.20
103.29
103.29
0.11
0.24
18.75
18.75
0.02
0.25
18.80
18.80
0.02
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
2.00
93.90
93.90
0.096
0.25
19.53
19.53
0.020
0.32
24.06
24.06
0.025
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
1.60
75.12
75.12
0.08
0.21
16.41
16.41
0.02
0.19
14.29
14.29
0.01
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
1.20
56.34
56.34
0.05
0.17
13.28
13.28
0.01
0.05
3.61
3.61
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
2.60
122.07
122.07
0.124
0.30
23.44
23.44
0.024
0.32
24.06
24.06
0.025
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
1.60
75.12
75.12
0.08
0.22
17.19
17.19
0.02
0.18
13.53
13.53
0.01
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.42
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
4.50
211.27
211.27
0.27
0.65
50.78
50.78
0.07
0.45
33.83
33.83
0.04
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.89
41.78
41.78
0.09
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
2.90
136.15
136.15
0.20
0.43
33.59
33.59
0.05
0.49
36.84
36.84
0.05
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.42
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.10
7.81
7.81
0.01
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.42
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
7.03
7.03
0.01
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
2.30
107.98
107.98
--
0.31
24.22
24.22
--
0.21
15.79
15.79
--
C2-Naphthalenes
510
~
2.10
98.59
98.59
0.19
0.13
10.16
10.16
0.02
0.23
17.29
17.29
0.03
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
2.80
131.46
131.46
0.18
0.39
30.47
30.47
0.04
0.22
16.54
16.54
0.02
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.42
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.98
46.01
46.01
0.06
0.12
9.38
9.38
0.01
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
1.10
51.64
51.64
0.05
0.15
11.72
11.72
0.01
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
2.40
112.68
112.68
0.19
0.24
18.75
18.75
0.03
0.16
12.03
12.03
0.02
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
2.20
103.29
103.29
0.12
0.31
24.22
24.22
0.03
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.42
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
2.20
103.29
103.29
0.16
0.27
21.09
21.09
0.03
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
1.50
70.42
70.42
0.08
0.23
17.97
17.97
0.02
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
3.20
150.23
150.23
0.18
0.40
31.25
31.25
0.04
0.46
34.59
34.59
0.04
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.54
25.35
25.35
0.023
0.07
5.31
5.31
0.005
0.06
4.81
4.81
0.004
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
7.00
328.64
328.64
0.46
0.96
75.00
75.00
0.11
1.40
105.26
105.26
0.15
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.79
37.09
37.09
0.069
0.07
5.08
5.08
0.009
0.24
18.05
18.05
0.034
Naphthalene
385
61,700
1.00
46.95
46.95
0.12
0.09
6.88
6.88
0.02
0.09
6.47
6.47
0.02
Perylene
967
431
0.57
26.76
26.76
0.03
0.09
7.27
7.27
0.01
0.06
4.66
4.66
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
5.30
248.83
248.83
0.42
0.76
59.38
59.38
0.10
1.60
120.30
120.30
0.20
Pyrene
697
9,090
6.10
286.38
286.38
0.41
0.84
65.63
65.63
0.09
0.91
68.42
68.42
0.10
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
4.16
--
--
--
0.89
--
--
--
0.95
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 28 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-15
HT18-15
HT18-15
Sample Name:
HT18-15-0005
HT18-15-0530
HT18-15-3050
Sample Date:
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0.5-3
3-5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
ESBTU
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
0.569
0.00569
--
--
0.979
0.00979
--
--
1.34
0.0134
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.00
0.19
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.42
0.42
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.25
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.00
0.21
0.21
0.000
0.01
0.53
0.53
0.001
0.00
0.28
0.28
0.001
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.00
0.49
0.49
0.001
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.00
0.09
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.00
0.58
0.58
0.001
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.01
1.27
1.27
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.04
0.00
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.00
0.76
0.76
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.04
0.00
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.01
1.35
1.35
0.001
0.00
0.16
0.16
0.000
0.00
0.11
0.11
0.000
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.01
1.09
1.09
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.15
0.00
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.01
1.04
1.04
0.00
0.00
0.34
0.34
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.22
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.01
1.25
1.25
0.001
0.00
0.11
0.11
0.000
0.00
0.08
0.08
0.000
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.01
1.62
1.62
0.00
0.00
0.46
0.46
0.00
0.00
0.32
0.32
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.00
0.70
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.02
2.81
2.81
0.00
0.01
0.74
0.74
0.00
0.01
0.52
0.52
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.65
0.65
0.00
0.00
0.36
0.36
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.02
2.81
2.81
0.00
0.02
1.53
1.53
0.00
0.02
1.19
1.19
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.01
1.35
1.35
0.00
0.00
0.48
0.48
0.00
0.00
0.36
0.36
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.01
1.51
1.51
0.00
0.01
0.58
0.58
0.00
0.01
0.45
0.45
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.01
2.28
2.28
"
0.01
1.00
1.00
"
0.01
0.74
0.74
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.01
1.60
1.60
0.00
0.02
2.15
2.15
0.00
0.02
1.42
1.42
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.03
4.39
4.39
0.01
0.02
2.15
2.15
0.00
0.02
1.64
1.64
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.00
0.72
0.72
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.01
2.11
2.11
0.00
0.01
0.89
0.89
0.00
0.01
0.67
0.67
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.01
1.65
1.65
0.00
0.01
0.93
0.93
0.00
0.01
0.66
0.66
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.03
4.39
4.39
0.01
0.04
4.19
4.19
0.01
0.04
3.06
3.06
0.01
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.03
4.39
4.39
0.01
0.02
1.84
1.84
0.00
0.02
1.42
1.42
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.04
7.56
7.56
0.01
0.06
6.33
6.33
0.01
0.07
4.85
4.85
0.01
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.02
3.51
3.51
0.00
0.01
1.33
1.33
0.00
0.01
0.97
0.97
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.01
2.11
2.11
0.00
0.00
0.35
0.35
0.00
0.00
0.27
0.27
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.00
0.26
0.26
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.03
4.75
4.75
0.01
0.00
0.15
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.08
0.00
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.00
0.42
0.42
0.001
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.000
0.00
0.08
0.08
0.000
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.00
0.15
0.15
0.00
0.01
0.54
0.54
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.24
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.01
1.09
1.09
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.18
0.18
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.01
1.93
1.93
0.00
0.01
0.55
0.55
0.00
0.01
0.37
0.37
0.00
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.02
3.34
3.34
0.00
0.00
0.26
0.26
0.00
0.00
0.18
0.18
0.00
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.08
"
--
--
0.04
"
--
--
0.03
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 29 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-15
HT18-16
HT18-17
Sample Name:
HT18-15-3050-FD
HT18-16-SURF
HT-18-17-SURF
Sample Date:
10/25/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
3-5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
ESBTU
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
wt.
jig/goc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
0.946
0.00946
--
--
3.36
0.0336
--
--
0.622
0.00622
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.00
0.37
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.24
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.00
0.43
0.43
0.001
0.01
0.17
0.17
0.000
0.00
0.27
0.27
0.001
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.01
0.26
0.26
0.001
0.01
0.82
0.82
0.002
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.02
0.51
0.51
0.001
0.01
0.92
0.92
0.002
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.00
0.10
2.98
2.98
0.00
0.03
4.66
4.66
0.01
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.00
0.10
2.98
2.98
0.00
0.01
1.77
1.77
0.00
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.00
0.17
0.17
0.000
0.15
4.46
4.46
0.005
0.04
5.95
5.95
0.006
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.00
0.22
0.22
0.00
0.11
3.27
3.27
0.00
0.03
4.02
4.02
0.00
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.00
0.34
0.34
0.00
0.05
1.43
1.43
0.00
0.01
1.93
1.93
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.000
0.13
3.87
3.87
0.004
0.04
5.63
5.63
0.006
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.00
0.52
0.52
0.00
0.05
1.61
1.61
0.00
0.02
2.41
2.41
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.00
0.42
0.42
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.01
0.85
0.85
0.00
0.11
3.27
3.27
0.00
0.03
4.50
4.50
0.01
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.01
0.55
0.55
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.02
1.69
1.69
0.00
0.06
1.67
1.67
0.00
0.02
2.89
2.89
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.00
0.52
0.52
0.00
0.04
1.07
1.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.01
0.72
0.72
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.01
1.16
1.16
"
0.08
2.50
2.50
"
0.02
3.05
3.05
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.02
2.11
2.11
0.00
0.04
1.10
1.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.02
2.33
2.33
0.00
0.05
1.55
1.55
0.00
0.01
2.25
2.25
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.01
1.06
1.06
0.00
0.05
1.46
1.46
0.00
0.01
1.77
1.77
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.01
0.99
0.99
0.00
0.04
1.22
1.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.04
4.55
4.55
0.01
0.07
2.08
2.08
0.00
0.01
1.93
1.93
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.02
2.11
2.11
0.00
0.04
1.22
1.22
0.00
0.01
1.59
1.59
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.07
7.19
7.19
0.01
0.08
2.41
2.41
0.00
0.02
2.41
2.41
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.01
1.48
1.48
0.00
0.03
0.83
0.83
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.00
0.41
0.41
0.00
0.17
5.06
5.06
0.01
0.04
6.43
6.43
0.01
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.03
0.95
0.95
0.001
0.01
1.32
1.32
0.001
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.00
0.14
0.14
0.00
0.37
11.01
11.01
0.02
0.10
16.08
16.08
0.02
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.000
0.01
0.33
0.33
0.001
0.01
0.82
0.82
0.002
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.00
0.39
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.23
0.23
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.00
0.27
0.27
0.00
0.03
0.74
0.74
0.00
0.01
0.98
0.98
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.01
0.56
0.56
0.00
0.16
4.76
4.76
0.01
0.06
9.16
9.16
0.02
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.00
0.29
0.29
0.00
0.23
6.85
6.85
0.01
0.06
10.29
10.29
0.01
--
ESBTU FCVi
"
--
--
0.04
--
--
--
0.09
--
--
--
0.12
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 30 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-17
HT18-17
HT18-17
Sample Name:
HT-18-17-0010
HT-18-17-1030
HT-18-17-3050
Sample Date:
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-1
1-3
3-4.7
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
0.728
0.00728
--
--
0.801
0.00801
--
--
0.757
0.00757
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.01
0.81
0.81
0.00
0.01
0.62
0.62
0.00
0.01
0.70
0.70
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.01
0.91
0.91
0.002
0.01
0.69
0.69
0.002
0.01
0.75
0.75
0.002
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.00
0.54
0.54
0.001
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.01
1.28
1.28
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.02
2.61
2.61
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.00
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.02
2.20
2.20
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.16
0.16
0.00
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.02
2.20
2.20
0.002
0.00
0.27
0.27
0.000
0.00
0.36
0.36
0.000
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.01
1.65
1.65
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.31
0.00
0.00
0.45
0.45
0.00
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.01
1.65
1.65
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.65
0.65
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.01
1.92
1.92
0.002
0.00
0.14
0.14
0.000
0.00
0.16
0.16
0.000
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.01
1.92
1.92
0.00
0.01
0.72
0.72
0.00
0.01
0.90
0.90
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.01
1.21
1.21
0.00
0.01
0.62
0.62
0.00
0.01
0.85
0.85
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.04
4.81
4.81
0.01
0.01
1.20
1.20
0.00
0.01
1.72
1.72
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.01
1.18
1.18
0.00
0.01
0.90
0.90
0.00
0.01
1.00
1.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.04
5.08
5.08
0.01
0.02
2.50
2.50
0.00
0.02
3.17
3.17
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.01
1.17
1.17
0.00
0.01
0.76
0.76
0.00
0.01
0.99
0.99
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.02
2.06
2.06
0.00
0.01
0.97
0.97
0.00
0.01
1.31
1.31
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.02
3.30
3.30
"
0.01
1.62
1.62
"
0.02
2.25
2.25
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.03
4.40
4.40
0.01
0.03
3.25
3.25
0.01
0.03
3.70
3.70
0.01
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.04
5.91
5.91
0.01
0.03
3.37
3.37
0.00
0.03
4.23
4.23
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.01
0.74
0.74
0.00
0.00
0.51
0.51
0.00
0.01
0.73
0.73
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.02
2.75
2.75
0.00
0.01
1.50
1.50
0.00
0.02
1.98
1.98
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.02
2.34
2.34
0.00
0.01
1.37
1.37
0.00
0.01
1.85
1.85
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
0.07
9.20
9.20
0.02
0.05
6.74
6.74
0.01
0.06
8.19
8.19
0.01
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.04
4.81
4.81
0.01
0.02
2.87
2.87
0.00
0.03
3.70
3.70
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.10
13.74
13.74
0.02
0.08
10.36
10.36
0.02
0.10
13.21
13.21
0.02
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
--
0.03
3.43
3.43
0.00
0.02
2.00
2.00
0.00
0.02
2.64
2.64
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.02
3.16
3.16
0.00
0.00
0.59
0.59
0.00
0.01
0.74
0.74
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.00
0.51
0.51
0.000
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.000
0.00
0.08
0.08
0.000
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.06
7.83
7.83
0.01
0.00
0.20
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.26
0.26
0.00
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.00
0.62
0.62
0.001
0.00
0.19
0.19
0.000
0.00
0.26
0.26
0.000
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.01
0.71
0.71
0.00
0.00
0.55
0.55
0.00
0.01
0.70
0.70
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.01
1.04
1.04
0.00
0.00
0.36
0.36
0.00
0.00
0.46
0.46
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.03
4.12
4.12
0.01
0.01
0.86
0.86
0.00
0.01
1.18
1.18
0.00
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.05
6.46
6.46
0.01
0.00
0.41
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.57
0.57
0.00
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.14
"
--
--
0.06
"
--
--
0.08
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 31 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-18
HT18-18
HT18-18
Sample Name:
HT18-18-SURF
HT18-18-0020
HT18-18-2030
Sample Date:
10/24/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1.9
1.9-2.8
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
ESBTU
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
3.11
0.0311
--
--
5.81
0.0581
--
--
1.43
0.0143
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.01
0.32
0.32
0.00
0.49
8.43
8.43
0.02
0.01
0.50
0.50
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.01
0.32
0.32
0.001
0.34
5.85
5.85
0.013
0.01
0.54
0.54
0.001
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.03
1.03
1.03
0.002
1.10
18.93
18.93
0.039
0.01
0.91
0.91
0.002
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
2.41
2.41
0.01
0.00
0.27
0.27
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.07
2.35
2.35
0.004
1.80
30.98
30.98
0.052
0.02
1.19
1.19
0.002
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.32
10.29
10.29
0.01
6.90
118.76
118.76
0.14
0.01
0.77
0.77
0.00
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.27
8.68
8.68
0.01
4.80
82.62
82.62
0.09
0.01
0.59
0.59
0.00
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.35
11.25
11.25
0.011
6.40
110.15
110.15
0.113
0.01
0.50
0.50
0.001
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.25
8.04
8.04
0.01
4.30
74.01
74.01
0.08
0.01
0.49
0.49
0.00
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.15
4.82
4.82
0.00
3.10
53.36
53.36
0.05
0.01
0.77
0.77
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.33
10.61
10.61
0.011
5.10
87.78
87.78
0.089
0.01
0.45
0.45
0.000
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.15
4.82
4.82
0.01
3.30
56.80
56.80
0.06
0.01
0.91
0.91
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.10
18.93
18.93
0.03
0.01
0.98
0.98
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.30
9.65
9.65
0.01
10.00
172.12
172.12
0.22
0.03
1.96
1.96
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.70
0.70
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.17
5.47
5.47
0.01
8.10
139.41
139.41
0.21
0.07
4.55
4.55
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.30
39.59
39.59
0.04
0.01
0.77
0.77
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.80
48.19
48.19
0.07
0.02
1.33
1.33
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.17
5.47
5.47
"
5.40
92.94
92.94
--
0.02
1.47
1.47
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.60
79.17
79.17
0.16
0.06
4.20
4.20
0.01
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.12
3.86
3.86
0.01
11.00
189.33
189.33
0.25
0.06
4.34
4.34
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.10
18.93
18.93
0.02
0.01
0.50
0.50
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.10
70.57
70.57
0.09
0.02
1.61
1.61
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.08
2.60
2.60
0.00
3.70
63.68
63.68
0.07
0.02
1.26
1.26
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
11.00
189.33
189.33
0.33
0.12
8.39
8.39
0.01
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.90
153.18
153.18
0.18
0.05
3.15
3.15
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.08
2.70
2.70
0.00
9.00
154.91
154.91
0.24
0.17
11.89
11.89
0.02
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.00
103.27
103.27
0.11
0.03
2.17
2.17
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.40
12.86
12.86
0.02
8.10
139.41
139.41
0.17
0.02
1.05
1.05
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.08
2.54
2.54
0.002
1.30
22.38
22.38
0.020
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.000
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.95
30.55
30.55
0.04
18.00
309.81
309.81
0.44
0.03
2.24
2.24
0.00
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.04
1.32
1.32
0.002
1.10
18.93
18.93
0.035
0.01
0.84
0.84
0.002
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.01
0.42
0.42
0.00
0.24
4.13
4.13
0.01
0.01
0.55
0.55
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.09
2.73
2.73
0.00
1.40
24.10
24.10
0.02
0.00
0.31
0.31
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.50
16.08
16.08
0.03
11.00
189.33
189.33
0.32
0.06
4.06
4.06
0.01
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.56
18.01
18.01
0.03
14.00
240.96
240.96
0.35
0.03
2.17
2.17
0.00
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.22
--
--
--
4.07
--
--
--
0.10
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 32 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-18
HT18-18
HT18-19
Sample Name:
HT18-18-3035
HT18-18-3555
HT18-19-SURF
Sample Date:
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/24/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
2.8-3.6
3.6-5.4
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
0.873
0.00873
--
--
0.612
0.00612
--
--
0.806
0.00806
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.00
0.44
0.44
0.00
0.01
0.85
0.85
0.00
0.01
1.74
1.74
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.00
0.47
0.47
0.001
0.01
0.98
0.98
0.002
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.000
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.01
1.49
1.49
0.003
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.09
10.55
10.55
0.021
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.00
0.30
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
16.13
16.13
0.04
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.02
2.18
2.18
0.004
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.19
23.57
23.57
0.040
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.05
5.27
5.27
0.01
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.00
1.20
148.88
148.88
0.18
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.04
4.12
4.12
0.00
0.00
0.18
0.18
0.00
1.00
124.07
124.07
0.13
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.04
4.24
4.24
0.004
0.00
0.39
0.39
0.000
1.20
148.88
148.88
0.152
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.03
3.09
3.09
0.00
0.00
0.51
0.51
0.00
0.97
120.35
120.35
0.12
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.02
2.29
2.29
0.00
0.00
0.78
0.78
0.00
0.58
71.96
71.96
0.07
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.03
3.44
3.44
0.004
0.00
0.23
0.23
0.000
1.20
148.88
148.88
0.152
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.03
3.44
3.44
0.00
0.01
1.08
1.08
0.00
0.56
69.48
69.48
0.07
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.01
1.37
1.37
0.00
0.01
0.87
0.87
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.07
8.13
8.13
0.01
0.01
1.80
1.80
0.00
0.87
107.94
107.94
0.14
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.24
1.24
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.07
7.67
7.67
0.01
0.02
3.59
3.59
0.01
0.38
47.15
47.15
0.07
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.02
1.72
1.72
0.00
0.01
1.14
1.14
0.00
0.38
47.15
47.15
0.05
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.02
2.29
2.29
0.00
0.01
1.49
1.49
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.04
4.47
4.47
"
0.01
2.29
2.29
"
0.56
69.48
69.48
--
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.03
3.89
3.89
0.01
0.03
4.90
4.90
0.01
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.07
8.48
8.48
0.01
0.03
4.90
4.90
0.01
0.26
32.26
32.26
0.04
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.80
0.00
0.25
31.02
31.02
0.03
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.03
2.98
2.98
0.00
0.01
2.12
2.12
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.02
2.75
2.75
0.00
0.01
2.12
2.12
0.00
0.36
44.67
44.67
0.05
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
0.08
9.51
9.51
0.02
0.06
9.97
9.97
0.02
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.06
6.30
6.30
0.01
0.03
4.25
4.25
0.01
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.10
11.45
11.45
0.02
0.09
14.22
14.22
0.02
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
--
0.04
4.24
4.24
0.00
0.02
2.94
2.94
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.05
6.07
6.07
0.01
0.01
0.83
0.83
0.00
1.30
161.29
161.29
0.19
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.01
0.89
0.89
0.001
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.000
0.26
32.26
32.26
0.029
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.11
12.60
12.60
0.02
0.00
0.38
0.38
0.00
2.70
334.99
334.99
0.47
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.01
1.37
1.37
0.003
0.00
0.28
0.28
0.001
0.10
12.41
12.41
0.023
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.00
0.53
0.53
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.80
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.01
1.60
1.60
0.00
0.00
0.57
0.57
0.00
0.33
40.94
40.94
0.04
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.08
9.28
9.28
0.02
0.01
1.32
1.32
0.00
1.10
136.48
136.48
0.23
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.10
10.88
10.88
0.02
0.00
0.62
0.62
0.00
1.80
223.33
223.33
0.32
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.20
"
--
--
0.09
--
--
--
2.72
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 33 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-19
HT18-19
HT18-19
Sample Name:
HT18-19-0010
HT18-19-1020
HT18-19-2030
Sample Date:
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-1
1-2.3
2.3-2.8
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
5.98
0.0598
--
--
0.768
0.00768
--
--
0.472
0.00472
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.26
4.35
4.35
0.01
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.34
0.34
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.41
6.86
6.86
0.015
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.40
0.40
0.001
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
2.10
35.12
35.12
0.072
0.82
106.77
106.77
0.217
0.01
2.06
2.06
0.004
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
2.10
35.12
35.12
0.059
1.30
169.27
169.27
0.285
0.01
2.97
2.97
0.005
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
8.10
135.45
135.45
0.16
3.30
429.69
429.69
0.51
0.04
9.11
9.11
0.01
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
5.40
90.30
90.30
0.09
2.40
312.50
312.50
0.32
0.04
7.42
7.42
0.01
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
6.90
115.38
115.38
0.118
2.70
351.56
351.56
0.359
0.04
7.84
7.84
0.008
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
5.00
83.61
83.61
0.09
2.00
260.42
260.42
0.27
0.03
5.93
5.93
0.01
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
3.80
63.55
63.55
0.06
1.60
208.33
208.33
0.19
0.03
5.72
5.72
0.01
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
6.10
102.01
102.01
0.104
2.60
338.54
338.54
0.345
0.04
7.42
7.42
0.008
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
5.10
85.28
85.28
0.09
1.30
169.27
169.27
0.18
0.02
4.66
4.66
0.01
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
12.00
200.67
200.67
0.26
3.80
494.79
494.79
0.64
0.06
12.50
12.50
0.02
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
11.00
183.95
183.95
0.27
2.30
299.48
299.48
0.45
0.05
10.17
10.17
0.02
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
3.20
53.51
53.51
0.05
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
2.97
2.97
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
3.80
63.55
63.55
0.09
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
2.54
2.54
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
6.80
113.71
113.71
--
1.40
182.29
182.29
--
0.03
6.14
6.14
--
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
5.70
95.32
95.32
0.19
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
4.03
4.03
0.01
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
15.00
250.84
250.84
0.34
1.70
221.35
221.35
0.30
0.05
11.23
11.23
0.02
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
5.30
88.63
88.63
0.12
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
3.81
3.81
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
5.10
85.28
85.28
0.09
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
3.81
3.81
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
16.00
267.56
267.56
0.46
0.93
121.09
121.09
0.21
0.04
9.32
9.32
0.02
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
13.00
217.39
217.39
0.26
1.10
143.23
143.23
0.17
0.04
8.90
8.90
0.01
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
15.00
250.84
250.84
0.38
0.83
108.07
108.07
0.16
0.04
9.32
9.32
0.01
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
7.70
128.76
128.76
0.14
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
6.99
6.99
0.01
Chrysene
844
826
9.30
155.52
155.52
0.18
3.50
455.73
455.73
0.54
0.05
10.38
10.38
0.01
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
1.50
25.08
25.08
0.022
0.58
75.52
75.52
0.067
0.01
1.86
1.86
0.002
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
22.00
367.89
367.89
0.52
8.90
1158.85
1158.85
1.64
0.11
23.31
23.31
0.03
Fluorene
538
26,000
1.50
25.08
25.08
0.047
0.47
61.20
61.20
0.114
0.01
1.38
1.38
0.003
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.27
4.52
4.52
0.01
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.44
0.44
0.00
Perylene
967
431
1.60
26.76
26.76
0.03
0.73
95.05
95.05
0.10
0.02
4.45
4.45
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
13.00
217.39
217.39
0.36
6.50
846.35
846.35
1.42
0.07
15.04
15.04
0.03
Pyrene
697
9,090
18.00
301.00
301.00
0.43
7.50
976.56
976.56
1.40
0.09
18.86
18.86
0.03
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
5.07
--
--
--
10.08
--
--
--
0.29
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 34 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-20
HT18-20
HT18-20
Sample Name:
HT18-20-SURF
HT18-20-0010
HT18-20-1020
Sample Date:
10/24/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.8
0.8-1.8
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
ESBTU
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
1.67
0.0167
--
--
0.531
0.00531
--
--
0.7
0.007
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.01
0.53
0.53
0.00
0.01
2.64
2.64
0.01
0.00
0.26
0.26
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.01
0.60
0.60
0.001
0.02
3.39
3.39
0.008
0.00
0.37
0.37
0.001
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.04
2.63
2.63
0.005
0.08
15.44
15.44
0.031
0.01
1.86
1.86
0.004
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.01
0.48
0.48
0.00
0.01
2.64
2.64
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.09
5.15
5.15
0.009
0.10
18.83
18.83
0.032
0.01
0.76
0.76
0.001
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.33
19.76
19.76
0.02
0.40
75.33
75.33
0.09
0.01
1.23
1.23
0.00
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.27
16.17
16.17
0.02
0.26
48.96
48.96
0.05
0.01
0.96
0.96
0.00
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.34
20.36
20.36
0.021
0.40
75.33
75.33
0.077
0.01
0.91
0.91
0.001
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.22
13.17
13.17
0.01
0.28
52.73
52.73
0.05
0.00
0.63
0.63
0.00
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.07
4.25
4.25
0.00
0.21
39.55
39.55
0.04
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.31
18.56
18.56
0.019
0.35
65.91
65.91
0.067
0.01
1.01
1.01
0.001
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.12
7.19
7.19
0.01
0.17
32.02
32.02
0.03
0.00
0.64
0.64
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.28
16.77
16.77
0.02
0.48
90.40
90.40
0.12
0.01
1.57
1.57
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.17
10.18
10.18
0.02
0.25
47.08
47.08
0.07
0.01
1.36
1.36
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.15
8.98
8.98
--
0.23
43.31
43.31
--
0.01
0.87
0.87
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.96
0.96
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.10
5.75
5.75
0.01
0.21
39.55
39.55
0.05
0.01
0.83
0.83
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
16.01
16.01
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.10
18.27
18.27
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
20.72
20.72
0.04
0.01
0.77
0.77
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
24.48
24.48
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.10
18.83
18.83
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
--
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.39
23.35
23.35
0.03
0.46
86.63
86.63
0.10
0.01
1.27
1.27
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.07
4.43
4.43
0.004
0.07
13.94
13.94
0.012
0.00
0.20
0.20
0.000
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.95
56.89
56.89
0.08
1.10
207.16
207.16
0.29
0.02
2.86
2.86
0.00
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.05
2.93
2.93
0.005
0.06
11.68
11.68
0.022
0.01
0.81
0.81
0.002
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.02
1.08
1.08
0.00
0.03
4.71
4.71
0.01
0.01
0.76
0.76
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.07
4.07
4.07
0.00
0.09
17.70
17.70
0.02
0.01
2.00
2.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.54
32.34
32.34
0.05
0.60
112.99
112.99
0.19
0.03
3.86
3.86
0.01
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.63
37.72
37.72
0.05
0.84
158.19
158.19
0.23
0.02
2.14
2.14
0.00
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.41
--
--
--
1.75
"
--
--
0.04
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 35 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT18-20
HT18-20
HT18-21
HT18-20-2030
HT18-20-2030-FD
HT18-21-SURF
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/24/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
1.8-2.8
1.8-2.8
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
0.987
0.00987
--
--
0.629
0.00629
--
--
2.26
0.0226
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.00
0.15
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.37
0.37
0.00
0.01
0.44
0.44
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.00
0.19
0.19
0.000
0.00
0.41
0.41
0.001
0.02
0.71
0.71
0.002
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.02
1.72
1.72
0.004
0.02
3.50
3.50
0.007
0.03
1.46
1.46
0.003
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.00
0.14
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.38
0.38
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.02
1.82
1.82
0.003
0.03
5.41
5.41
0.009
0.11
4.87
4.87
0.008
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.04
3.85
3.85
0.00
0.07
10.65
10.65
0.01
0.20
8.85
8.85
0.01
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.03
3.04
3.04
0.00
0.05
7.95
7.95
0.01
0.14
6.19
6.19
0.01
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.03
2.84
2.84
0.003
0.05
7.15
7.15
0.007
0.16
7.08
7.08
0.007
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.02
2.23
2.23
0.00
0.04
5.56
5.56
0.01
0.16
7.08
7.08
0.01
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.02
1.82
1.82
0.00
0.03
4.61
4.61
0.00
0.04
1.55
1.55
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.03
3.04
3.04
0.003
0.05
8.27
8.27
0.008
0.12
5.31
5.31
0.005
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.02
1.82
1.82
0.00
0.03
4.93
4.93
0.01
0.16
7.08
7.08
0.01
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.01
0.87
0.87
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.06
5.67
5.67
0.01
0.09
14.94
14.94
0.02
0.36
15.93
15.93
0.02
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.05
4.66
4.66
0.01
0.07
11.13
11.13
0.02
0.19
8.41
8.41
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.22
9.73
9.73
0.01
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.02
2.23
2.23
"
0.04
5.88
5.88
--
0.44
19.47
19.47
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
~
0.01
1.32
1.32
0.00
0.02
2.86
2.86
0.01
0.07
3.23
3.23
0.01
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
0.03
3.14
3.14
0.00
0.05
7.15
7.15
0.01
0.13
5.75
5.75
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
8.85
8.85
0.01
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.01
0.98
0.98
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.29
12.83
12.83
0.01
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.02
2.13
2.13
0.00
0.03
4.45
4.45
0.01
0.08
3.45
3.45
0.01
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.02
1.62
1.62
0.00
0.02
3.82
3.82
0.00
0.14
6.19
6.19
0.01
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
3.94
3.94
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.02
2.23
2.23
0.00
0.03
4.13
4.13
0.01
0.05
2.26
2.26
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.01
1.11
1.11
0.00
0.02
3.18
3.18
0.00
0.13
5.75
5.75
0.01
Chrysene
844
826
0.04
4.05
4.05
0.00
0.07
10.81
10.81
0.01
0.22
9.73
9.73
0.01
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.01
0.63
0.63
0.001
0.01
1.75
1.75
0.002
0.04
1.68
1.68
0.001
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.10
10.13
10.13
0.01
0.17
27.03
27.03
0.04
0.58
25.66
25.66
0.04
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.00
0.44
0.44
0.001
0.01
1.35
1.35
0.003
0.05
2.12
2.12
0.004
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.00
0.27
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.59
0.59
0.00
0.01
0.35
0.35
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.04
3.55
3.55
0.00
0.04
5.56
5.56
0.01
0.03
1.46
1.46
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.09
8.92
8.92
0.01
0.13
20.67
20.67
0.03
0.51
22.57
22.57
0.04
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.09
8.61
8.61
0.01
0.14
22.26
22.26
0.03
0.40
17.70
17.70
0.03
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.11
--
--
--
0.28
--
--
--
0.27
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 36 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT18-21
HT18-23
HT18-23
HT18-21-0015
HT18-23-SURF
HT18-23-0010
10/25/2018
10/23/2018
10/24/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-1.7
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
1.08
0.0108
--
--
3.3
0.033
--
--
0.943
0.00943
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.01
0.75
0.75
0.00
0.01
0.20
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.19
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.01
1.30
1.30
0.003
0.01
0.19
0.19
0.000
0.00
0.21
0.21
0.000
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.02
1.39
1.39
0.003
0.01
0.30
0.30
0.001
0.00
0.38
0.38
0.001
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.00
0.36
0.36
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.16
0.16
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.02
1.67
1.67
0.003
0.02
0.67
0.67
0.001
0.01
0.74
0.74
0.001
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.07
6.76
6.76
0.01
0.15
4.55
4.55
0.01
0.05
4.88
4.88
0.01
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.06
5.93
5.93
0.01
0.17
5.15
5.15
0.01
0.04
4.14
4.14
0.00
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.08
7.41
7.41
0.008
0.24
7.27
7.27
0.007
0.07
7.10
7.10
0.007
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.15
13.89
13.89
0.01
0.18
5.45
5.45
0.01
0.04
4.56
4.56
0.00
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.09
7.96
7.96
0.01
0.14
4.24
4.24
0.00
0.04
3.92
3.92
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.07
6.30
6.30
0.006
0.22
6.67
6.67
0.007
0.05
5.41
5.41
0.006
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.18
16.67
16.67
0.02
0.07
2.09
2.09
0.00
0.02
2.12
2.12
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.31
28.70
28.70
0.04
0.16
4.85
4.85
0.01
0.06
6.36
6.36
0.01
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.02
1.39
1.39
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.11
10.19
10.19
0.02
0.08
2.36
2.36
0.00
0.03
3.50
3.50
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.33
30.56
30.56
0.03
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.38
1.38
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.04
3.61
3.61
0.01
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.27
1.27
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.55
50.93
50.93
--
0.09
2.76
2.76
"
0.04
3.82
3.82
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
~
0.06
5.83
5.83
0.01
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.27
1.27
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
0.22
20.37
20.37
0.03
0.06
1.88
1.88
0.00
0.06
6.15
6.15
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.26
24.07
24.07
0.02
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.08
7.13
7.13
0.01
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
2.33
2.33
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.48
44.44
44.44
0.05
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
2.01
2.01
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.08
7.22
7.22
0.01
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
2.86
2.86
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.35
32.41
32.41
0.04
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
4.24
4.24
0.01
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.13
12.04
12.04
0.01
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.09
8.24
8.24
0.01
0.06
1.88
1.88
0.00
0.04
4.24
4.24
0.01
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.34
31.48
31.48
0.03
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
2.76
2.76
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.13
12.04
12.04
0.01
0.26
7.88
7.88
0.01
0.06
6.79
6.79
0.01
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.03
2.31
2.31
0.002
0.05
1.55
1.55
0.001
0.01
1.27
1.27
0.001
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.15
13.89
13.89
0.02
0.57
17.27
17.27
0.02
0.13
13.79
13.79
0.02
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.02
1.57
1.57
0.003
0.02
0.52
0.52
0.001
0.00
0.40
0.40
0.001
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.01
0.91
0.91
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.20
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.02
1.94
1.94
0.00
0.05
1.61
1.61
0.00
0.02
2.01
2.01
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.12
11.11
11.11
0.02
0.21
6.36
6.36
0.01
0.06
6.04
6.04
0.01
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.15
13.89
13.89
0.02
0.34
10.30
10.30
0.01
0.11
11.66
11.66
0.02
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.43
--
--
--
0.12
--
--
--
0.15
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 37 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-23
HT18-23
HT18-23
Sample Name:
HT18-23-1030
HT18-23-3050
HT18-23-5070
Sample Date:
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
1-3
3-5
5-7
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
ESBTU
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
wt.
jig/goc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
0.416
0.00416
--
--
0.635
0.00635
--
--
1.1
0.011
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.05
0.05
0.000
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.04
0.04
0.000
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.00
0.19
0.19
0.000
0.00
0.16
0.16
0.000
0.00
0.15
0.15
0.000
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.11
0.00
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.00
0.15
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.44
0.44
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
"
0.00
0.00
0.00
"
0.00
0.00
0.00
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.69
0.69
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.69
0.69
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.58
0.58
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.00
0.99
0.99
0.00
0.01
1.13
1.13
0.00
0.01
1.18
1.18
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.00
0.20
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.21
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.00
0.14
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.16
0.16
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.11
0.00
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.000
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.00
0.53
0.53
0.00
0.00
0.57
0.57
0.00
0.00
0.43
0.43
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.20
0.00
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.00
0.16
0.16
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.16
0.16
0.00
--
ESBTU FCVi
"
"
--
0.00
"
--
--
0.00
"
--
--
0.01
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 38 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-23
HT18-24
HT18-24
Sample Name:
HT18-23-7010
HT18-24-SURF
HT18-24-0010
Sample Date:
10/24/2018
10/23/2018
10/24/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
7-9.2
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
ESBTU
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
wt.
jig/goc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
0.76
0.0076
--
--
2.67
0.0267
--
--
0.737
0.00737
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.00
0.25
0.25
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.00
0.14
0.14
0.000
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.000
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.000
0.06
2.10
2.10
0.004
0.04
5.83
5.83
0.012
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.15
5.62
5.62
0.009
0.08
10.45
10.45
0.018
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.00
0.11
0.11
0.00
0.60
22.47
22.47
0.03
0.34
46.13
46.13
0.05
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.00
0.45
16.85
16.85
0.02
0.16
21.71
21.71
0.02
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.00
0.46
0.46
0.000
0.57
21.35
21.35
0.022
0.35
47.49
47.49
0.049
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.00
0.39
0.39
0.00
0.39
14.61
14.61
0.02
0.23
31.21
31.21
0.03
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.27
10.11
10.11
0.01
0.18
24.42
24.42
0.02
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.000
0.55
20.60
20.60
0.021
0.28
37.99
37.99
0.039
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.01
0.76
0.76
0.00
0.18
6.74
6.74
0.01
0.11
14.93
14.93
0.02
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.01
1.24
1.24
0.00
0.47
17.60
17.60
0.02
0.35
47.49
47.49
0.06
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.01
1.58
1.58
0.00
0.23
8.61
8.61
0.01
0.20
27.14
27.14
0.04
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.01
0.70
0.70
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.01
1.28
1.28
"
0.19
7.12
7.12
--
0.11
14.93
14.93
--
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.01
1.11
1.11
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.02
2.76
2.76
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
14.93
14.93
0.02
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.01
0.87
0.87
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.01
1.00
1.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
0.02
2.76
2.76
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.02
2.11
2.11
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.04
4.87
4.87
0.01
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
--
0.01
1.45
1.45
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.01
0.71
0.71
0.00
0.74
27.72
27.72
0.03
0.42
56.99
56.99
0.07
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.12
4.49
4.49
0.004
0.07
9.91
9.91
0.009
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.00
0.42
0.42
0.00
2.20
82.40
82.40
0.12
1.10
149.25
149.25
0.21
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.00
0.24
0.24
0.000
0.09
3.18
3.18
0.006
0.03
4.61
4.61
0.009
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.01
1.30
1.30
0.00
0.13
4.87
4.87
0.01
0.06
8.68
8.68
0.01
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.00
0.47
0.47
0.00
1.20
44.94
44.94
0.08
0.58
78.70
78.70
0.13
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.00
0.57
0.57
0.00
1.20
44.94
44.94
0.06
0.66
89.55
89.55
0.13
--
ESBTU FCVi
"
--
--
0.04
--
--
--
0.48
--
--
--
0.98
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 39 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-24
HT18-24
HT18-24
Sample Name:
HT18-24-1025
HT18-24-2550
HT18-24-5065
Sample Date:
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
1-2.7
2.7-5
5-6.6
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
ESBTU
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
wt.
jig/goc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
0.695
0.00695
--
--
0.84
0.0084
--
--
0.755
0.00755
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.00
0.08
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.00
0.19
0.19
0.000
0.00
0.19
0.19
0.000
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.000
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.17
0.17
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.00
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.00
0.20
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.000
0.00
0.11
0.11
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.54
0.54
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
"
0.00
0.00
0.00
"
0.00
0.00
0.00
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.01
1.04
1.04
0.00
0.01
0.83
0.83
0.00
0.01
0.72
0.72
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.01
1.11
1.11
0.00
0.01
1.05
1.05
0.00
0.01
0.83
0.83
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.00
0.71
0.71
0.00
0.01
0.61
0.61
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.02
2.45
2.45
0.00
0.02
1.90
1.90
0.00
0.01
1.72
1.72
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.00
0.27
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.30
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.19
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.000
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.000
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.000
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.00
0.24
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.38
0.38
0.00
0.00
0.17
0.17
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
--
ESBTU FCVi
"
--
--
0.01
"
"
--
0.01
"
"
--
0.01
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 40 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT18-24
HT18-24
HT18-25
HT18-24-5065-FD
HT18-24-6575
HT18-25-SURF
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/23/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
5-6.6
6.6-7.8
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
jig/goc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
0.672
0.00672
--
--
0.692
0.00692
--
--
3.56
0.0356
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.00
0.09
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.62
0.62
0.00
0.01
0.15
0.15
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.65
0.65
0.001
0.01
0.17
0.17
0.000
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.05
0.05
0.000
0.03
0.70
0.70
0.001
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.08
0.08
0.000
0.06
1.60
1.60
0.003
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.00
0.26
7.30
7.30
0.01
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.20
0.00
0.24
6.74
6.74
0.01
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.00
0.18
0.18
0.000
0.00
0.39
0.39
0.000
0.32
8.99
8.99
0.009
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.00
0.09
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.52
0.52
0.00
0.21
5.90
5.90
0.01
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.64
0.64
0.00
0.15
4.21
4.21
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.00
0.11
0.11
0.000
0.00
0.11
0.11
0.000
0.25
7.02
7.02
0.007
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.08
1.08
0.00
0.10
2.81
2.81
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.81
0.81
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.73
1.73
0.00
0.23
6.46
6.46
0.01
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.87
0.87
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
3.18
3.18
0.00
0.11
3.09
3.09
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.10
1.10
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.59
1.59
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
"
0.02
2.31
2.31
"
0.11
3.09
3.09
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
3.76
3.76
0.01
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
0.01
1.09
1.09
0.00
0.03
4.48
4.48
0.01
0.06
1.63
1.63
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
~
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.88
0.88
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
2.02
2.02
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.59
1.59
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
0.01
1.28
1.28
0.00
0.06
8.53
8.53
0.01
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.01
0.82
0.82
0.00
0.03
4.05
4.05
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.02
2.68
2.68
0.00
0.10
13.73
13.73
0.02
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
--
0.00
0.65
0.65
0.00
0.02
2.89
2.89
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.00
0.28
0.28
0.00
0.01
0.82
0.82
0.00
0.35
9.83
9.83
0.01
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.000
0.07
1.85
1.85
0.002
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.35
0.35
0.00
0.77
21.63
21.63
0.03
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.00
0.09
0.09
0.000
0.00
0.23
0.23
0.000
0.03
0.87
0.87
0.002
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.32
0.32
0.00
0.01
0.25
0.25
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.00
0.19
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.55
0.55
0.00
0.07
1.85
1.85
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.05
1.05
0.00
0.35
9.83
9.83
0.02
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.62
0.62
0.00
0.46
12.92
12.92
0.02
--
ESBTU FCVi
"
--
--
0.01
"
--
--
0.08
--
--
--
0.15
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 41 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-25
HT18-25
HT18-25
Sample Name:
HT18-25-0010
HT18-25-1030
HT18-25-3040
Sample Date:
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-1
1-3
3-4.2
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
3.47
0.0347
--
--
6.72
0.0672
--
--
4.95
0.0495
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.06
1.59
1.59
0.00
0.23
3.42
3.42
0.01
1.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.08
2.16
2.16
0.005
0.14
2.08
2.08
0.005
1.30
0.00
0.00
0.000
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.13
3.75
3.75
0.008
0.46
6.85
6.85
0.014
1.20
24.24
24.24
0.049
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
1.40
1.40
0.00
1.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.27
7.78
7.78
0.013
0.79
11.76
11.76
0.020
3.00
60.61
60.61
0.102
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
1.60
46.11
46.11
0.05
2.80
41.67
41.67
0.05
8.80
177.78
177.78
0.21
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
1.00
28.82
28.82
0.03
2.10
31.25
31.25
0.03
6.90
139.39
139.39
0.14
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
1.60
46.11
46.11
0.047
2.50
37.20
37.20
0.038
7.20
145.45
145.45
0.149
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.79
22.77
22.77
0.02
1.80
26.79
26.79
0.03
5.30
107.07
107.07
0.11
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.09
2.62
2.62
0.00
1.10
16.37
16.37
0.01
4.20
84.85
84.85
0.08
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
1.30
37.46
37.46
0.038
2.10
31.25
31.25
0.032
6.80
137.37
137.37
0.140
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
1.20
34.58
34.58
0.04
2.70
40.18
40.18
0.04
3.90
78.79
78.79
0.08
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.62
9.23
9.23
0.02
1.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
2.10
60.52
60.52
0.08
4.10
61.01
61.01
0.08
8.80
177.78
177.78
0.23
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
1.80
51.87
51.87
0.08
4.60
68.45
68.45
0.10
5.60
113.13
113.13
0.17
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.60
17.29
17.29
0.02
1.70
25.30
25.30
0.03
1.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.59
17.00
17.00
0.02
2.00
29.76
29.76
0.04
1.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
1.50
43.23
43.23
--
3.00
44.64
44.64
--
3.50
70.71
70.71
--
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.71
20.46
20.46
0.04
2.70
40.18
40.18
0.08
1.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
3.10
89.34
89.34
0.12
7.40
110.12
110.12
0.15
4.60
92.93
92.93
0.12
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.10
16.37
16.37
0.01
1.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
1.20
34.58
34.58
0.04
3.40
50.60
50.60
0.07
1.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
1.00
28.82
28.82
0.03
2.00
29.76
29.76
0.03
1.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
1.80
51.87
51.87
0.09
8.30
123.51
123.51
0.21
1.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
3.30
95.10
95.10
0.11
7.00
104.17
104.17
0.13
3.80
76.77
76.77
0.09
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
2.20
63.40
63.40
0.10
8.60
127.98
127.98
0.19
1.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
2.40
69.16
69.16
0.08
4.40
65.48
65.48
0.07
3.00
60.61
60.61
0.07
Chrysene
844
826
2.10
60.52
60.52
0.07
3.40
50.60
50.60
0.06
10.00
202.02
202.02
0.24
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.33
9.51
9.51
0.008
0.54
8.04
8.04
0.007
1.50
30.30
30.30
0.027
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
4.40
126.80
126.80
0.18
7.90
117.56
117.56
0.17
26.00
525.25
525.25
0.74
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.18
5.19
5.19
0.010
0.59
8.78
8.78
0.016
1.70
34.34
34.34
0.064
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.05
1.50
1.50
0.00
0.08
1.19
1.19
0.00
1.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.16
4.61
4.61
0.00
0.53
7.89
7.89
0.01
2.00
40.40
40.40
0.04
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
1.90
54.76
54.76
0.09
4.50
66.96
66.96
0.11
16.00
323.23
323.23
0.54
Pyrene
697
9,090
2.80
80.69
80.69
0.12
5.00
74.40
74.40
0.11
16.00
323.23
323.23
0.46
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
1.54
--
--
--
1.95
--
--
--
3.95
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 42 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT18-25
HT18-25
HT18-26
HT18-25-4070
HT18-25-7010
HT18-26-SURF
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/23/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
4.2-7
7-9.5
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
jig/goc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
1.14
0.0114
--
--
0.736
0.00736
--
--
1.37
0.0137
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.00
0.01
0.51
0.51
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.00
0.04
0.04
0.000
0.00
0.08
0.08
0.000
0.01
0.60
0.60
0.001
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.02
1.49
1.49
0.003
0.00
0.05
0.05
0.000
0.02
1.68
1.68
0.003
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.00
0.36
0.36
0.001
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.05
3.28
3.28
0.006
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.00
0.18
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.00
0.30
21.90
21.90
0.03
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.00
0.11
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.00
0.24
17.52
17.52
0.02
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.00
0.25
0.25
0.000
0.00
0.30
0.30
0.000
0.41
29.93
29.93
0.031
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.00
0.21
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.24
0.00
0.25
18.25
18.25
0.02
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.02
1.32
1.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
5.33
5.33
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.00
0.17
0.17
0.000
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.000
0.32
23.36
23.36
0.024
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
10.22
10.22
0.01
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.00
0.40
0.40
0.00
0.01
0.82
0.82
0.00
0.27
19.71
19.71
0.03
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.01
0.69
0.69
0.00
0.01
1.05
1.05
0.00
0.14
10.22
10.22
0.02
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
"
0.01
0.77
0.77
"
0.15
10.95
10.95
--
C2-Naphthalenes
510
~
0.01
0.54
0.54
0.00
0.00
0.64
0.64
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
0.01
0.83
0.83
0.00
0.02
2.31
2.31
0.00
0.14
10.22
10.22
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
6.20
6.20
0.01
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.61
0.61
0.00
0.07
4.82
4.82
0.01
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.01
0.96
0.96
0.00
0.01
1.63
1.63
0.00
0.08
5.62
5.62
0.01
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.01
0.55
0.55
0.00
0.01
1.35
1.35
0.00
0.12
8.76
8.76
0.01
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.02
1.67
1.67
0.00
0.02
2.99
2.99
0.00
0.09
6.50
6.50
0.01
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.00
0.41
0.41
0.00
0.01
0.96
0.96
0.00
0.08
6.13
6.13
0.01
Chrysene
844
826
0.00
0.34
0.34
0.00
0.00
0.49
0.49
0.00
0.43
31.39
31.39
0.04
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.08
6.13
6.13
0.005
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.01
0.96
0.96
0.00
0.00
0.43
0.43
0.00
0.84
61.31
61.31
0.09
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.00
0.32
0.32
0.001
0.00
0.18
0.18
0.000
0.03
2.04
2.04
0.004
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.08
0.00
0.01
0.88
0.88
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.00
0.37
0.37
0.00
0.01
1.18
1.18
0.00
0.06
4.53
4.53
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.04
3.77
3.77
0.01
0.00
0.49
0.49
0.00
0.32
23.36
23.36
0.04
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.01
0.61
0.61
0.00
0.00
0.49
0.49
0.00
0.51
37.23
37.23
0.05
--
ESBTU FCVi
"
--
--
0.02
"
--
--
0.02
--
--
--
0.49
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 43 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-26
HT18-26
HT18-26
Sample Name:
HT18-26-0010
HT18-26-1030
HT18-26-3050
Sample Date:
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-1
1-3
3-5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
ESBTU
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
0.729
0.00729
--
--
1.26
0.0126
--
--
0.929
0.00929
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.000
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.000
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.09
11.66
11.66
0.024
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.000
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.000
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.32
43.90
43.90
0.074
0.00
0.22
0.22
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.89
122.09
122.09
0.15
0.01
0.87
0.87
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.00
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.69
94.65
94.65
0.10
0.01
0.78
0.78
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.09
0.00
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.81
111.11
111.11
0.113
0.01
0.87
0.87
0.001
0.00
0.27
0.27
0.000
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.56
76.82
76.82
0.08
0.01
0.65
0.65
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.24
0.00
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.49
67.22
67.22
0.06
0.01
0.67
0.67
0.00
0.00
0.23
0.23
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.68
93.28
93.28
0.095
0.01
0.79
0.79
0.001
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.34
46.64
46.64
0.05
0.01
0.58
0.58
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
1.00
137.17
137.17
0.18
0.02
1.19
1.19
0.00
0.01
0.68
0.68
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.55
75.45
75.45
0.11
0.01
0.74
0.74
0.00
0.01
0.58
0.58
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.36
49.38
49.38
--
0.01
0.70
0.70
"
0.01
0.62
0.62
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.51
0.51
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.42
57.61
57.61
0.08
0.01
0.95
0.95
0.00
0.01
0.98
0.98
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.33
0.33
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.48
0.48
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.77
0.77
0.00
0.01
1.08
1.08
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.28
38.41
38.41
0.05
0.02
1.27
1.27
0.00
0.01
1.08
1.08
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
1.19
1.19
0.00
0.02
1.83
1.83
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.74
0.74
0.00
0.01
0.71
0.71
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.97
133.06
133.06
0.16
0.01
1.11
1.11
0.00
0.00
0.41
0.41
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.17
23.32
23.32
0.021
0.00
0.17
0.17
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
2.40
329.22
329.22
0.47
0.03
2.14
2.14
0.00
0.00
0.36
0.36
0.00
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.05
6.45
6.45
0.012
0.00
0.08
0.08
0.000
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.000
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.14
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.21
28.81
28.81
0.03
0.01
0.79
0.79
0.00
0.01
0.85
0.85
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
1.40
192.04
192.04
0.32
0.01
1.03
1.03
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.31
0.00
Pyrene
697
9,090
2.00
274.35
274.35
0.39
0.02
1.67
1.67
0.00
0.00
0.38
0.38
0.00
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
2.61
"
--
--
0.03
"
--
--
0.02
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 44 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT18-26
HT18-26
HT18-26
HT18-26-3050-FD
HT18-26-5070
HT18-26-7010
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
3-5
5-7
7-9.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
jig/goc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
0.773
0.00773
--
--
0.831
0.00831
--
--
0.796
0.00796
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.00
0.14
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.18
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.000
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.000
0.00
0.08
0.08
0.000
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.000
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.00
0.08
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.00
0.34
0.34
0.000
0.00
0.24
0.24
0.000
0.00
0.23
0.23
0.000
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.00
0.22
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.20
0.00
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.00
0.34
0.34
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.08
0.08
0.000
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.01
0.71
0.71
0.00
0.01
0.76
0.76
0.00
0.01
0.69
0.69
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.01
0.67
0.67
0.00
0.01
0.85
0.85
0.00
0.01
0.90
0.90
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.01
0.66
0.66
"
0.01
0.72
0.72
"
0.01
0.70
0.70
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
~
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.59
0.59
0.00
0.00
0.62
0.62
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
0.01
1.05
1.05
0.00
0.01
1.32
1.32
0.00
0.02
1.88
1.88
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.54
0.54
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.01
1.19
1.19
0.00
0.01
1.32
1.32
0.00
0.01
1.76
1.76
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.01
1.13
1.13
0.00
0.01
1.20
1.20
0.00
0.01
1.09
1.09
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.02
2.33
2.33
0.00
0.02
2.41
2.41
0.00
0.02
2.76
2.76
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.01
0.76
0.76
0.00
0.01
0.85
0.85
0.00
0.01
0.80
0.80
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.00
0.44
0.44
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.40
0.40
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.00
0.38
0.38
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.23
0.23
0.00
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.000
0.00
0.11
0.11
0.000
0.00
0.15
0.15
0.000
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.00
0.16
0.16
0.00
0.00
0.17
0.17
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.01
0.92
0.92
0.00
0.02
2.05
2.05
0.00
0.01
1.21
1.21
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.00
0.28
0.28
0.00
0.00
0.30
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.45
0.45
0.00
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.00
0.39
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.28
0.28
0.00
0.00
0.30
0.30
0.00
--
ESBTU FCVi
"
--
--
0.02
"
--
--
0.02
"
--
--
0.02
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 45 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-27
HT18-27
HT18-29
Sample Name:
HT18-27-0010
HT18-27-1020
HT18-29-SURF
Sample Date:
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/22/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.8
0.8-2.4
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
1.52
0.0152
--
--
1.47
0.0147
--
--
0.936
0.00936
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.39
25.66
25.66
0.06
0.59
40.14
40.14
0.09
0.02
1.82
1.82
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.49
32.24
32.24
0.072
0.54
36.73
36.73
0.082
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.000
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
1.00
65.79
65.79
0.134
0.57
38.78
38.78
0.079
0.04
3.95
3.95
0.008
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.08
5.00
5.00
0.01
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
9.40
9.40
0.02
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.53
34.87
34.87
0.059
0.29
19.73
19.73
0.033
0.18
19.23
19.23
0.032
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
2.60
171.05
171.05
0.20
0.20
13.61
13.61
0.02
1.20
128.21
128.21
0.15
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
1.60
105.26
105.26
0.11
0.14
9.52
9.52
0.01
0.32
34.19
34.19
0.04
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
2.00
131.58
131.58
0.134
0.17
11.56
11.56
0.012
0.68
72.65
72.65
0.074
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
1.50
98.68
98.68
0.10
0.14
9.52
9.52
0.01
0.24
25.64
25.64
0.03
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
1.20
78.95
78.95
0.07
0.14
9.52
9.52
0.01
0.04
4.49
4.49
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
2.00
131.58
131.58
0.134
0.21
14.29
14.29
0.015
0.75
80.13
80.13
0.082
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.99
65.13
65.13
0.07
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.53
56.62
56.62
0.06
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.44
28.95
28.95
0.05
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
3.40
223.68
223.68
0.29
0.25
17.01
17.01
0.02
1.40
149.57
149.57
0.19
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.59
38.82
38.82
0.09
0.76
51.70
51.70
0.12
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
1.60
105.26
105.26
0.16
0.29
19.73
19.73
0.03
0.86
91.88
91.88
0.14
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.23
24.57
24.57
0.02
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
1.00
65.79
65.79
--
0.11
0.00
0.00
--
0.90
96.15
96.15
--
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
1.60
105.26
105.26
0.21
1.30
88.44
88.44
0.17
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
1.30
85.53
85.53
0.11
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.52
55.56
55.56
0.07
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.31
33.12
33.12
0.03
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
1.60
105.26
105.26
0.18
0.38
25.85
25.85
0.04
0.28
29.91
29.91
0.05
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.62
40.79
40.79
0.05
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.87
57.24
57.24
0.09
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
2.60
171.05
171.05
0.20
0.22
14.97
14.97
0.02
0.97
103.63
103.63
0.12
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.44
28.95
28.95
0.026
0.04
2.72
2.72
0.002
0.18
19.23
19.23
0.017
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
6.40
421.05
421.05
0.60
0.66
44.90
44.90
0.06
1.90
202.99
202.99
0.29
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.84
55.26
55.26
0.103
0.99
67.35
67.35
0.125
0.09
9.83
9.83
0.018
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.45
29.61
29.61
0.08
0.57
38.78
38.78
0.10
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.45
29.61
29.61
0.03
0.05
3.06
3.06
0.00
0.05
5.45
5.45
0.01
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
1.90
125.00
125.00
0.21
2.20
149.66
149.66
0.25
1.00
106.84
106.84
0.18
Pyrene
697
9,090
5.20
342.11
342.11
0.49
0.53
36.05
36.05
0.05
1.20
128.21
128.21
0.18
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
4.05
--
--
--
1.19
--
--
--
1.82
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 46 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT18-29
HT18-30
HT18-30
HT18-29-0010
HT18-30-SURF
HT18-30-0010
10/23/2018
10/22/2018
10/23/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-1.2
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
0.865
0.00865
--
--
2.57
0.0257
--
--
3.08
0.0308
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.04
4.28
4.28
0.01
0.01
0.34
0.34
0.00
0.01
0.39
0.39
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.04
4.16
4.16
0.009
0.01
0.28
0.28
0.001
0.01
0.32
0.32
0.001
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.18
20.81
20.81
0.042
0.01
0.32
0.32
0.001
0.04
1.14
1.14
0.002
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.03
3.24
3.24
0.01
0.00
0.19
0.19
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.32
36.99
36.99
0.062
0.02
0.66
0.66
0.001
0.08
2.53
2.53
0.004
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.77
89.02
89.02
0.11
0.12
4.67
4.67
0.01
0.24
7.79
7.79
0.01
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.48
55.49
55.49
0.06
0.06
2.45
2.45
0.00
0.17
5.52
5.52
0.01
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.60
69.36
69.36
0.071
0.18
7.00
7.00
0.007
0.29
9.42
9.42
0.010
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.46
53.18
53.18
0.05
0.06
2.18
2.18
0.00
0.20
6.49
6.49
0.01
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.39
45.09
45.09
0.04
0.01
0.47
0.47
0.00
0.18
5.84
5.84
0.01
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.61
70.52
70.52
0.072
0.14
5.45
5.45
0.006
0.26
8.44
8.44
0.009
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.29
33.53
33.53
0.04
0.06
2.22
2.22
0.00
0.09
2.79
2.79
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.85
98.27
98.27
0.13
0.15
5.84
5.84
0.01
0.26
8.44
8.44
0.01
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.65
75.14
75.14
0.11
0.08
2.92
2.92
0.00
0.16
5.19
5.19
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
1.28
1.28
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.48
55.49
55.49
--
0.09
3.62
3.62
"
0.13
4.22
4.22
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
~
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
1.63
1.63
0.00
0.06
2.01
2.01
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
0.37
42.77
42.77
0.06
0.07
2.76
2.76
0.00
0.09
3.02
3.02
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
1.36
1.36
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
2.84
2.84
0.00
0.08
2.47
2.47
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.23
26.59
26.59
0.03
0.05
1.95
1.95
0.00
0.05
1.62
1.62
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
4.28
4.28
0.01
0.07
2.31
2.31
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
1.17
1.17
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.82
94.80
94.80
0.11
0.16
6.23
6.23
0.01
0.31
10.06
10.06
0.01
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.14
16.18
16.18
0.014
0.03
1.17
1.17
0.001
0.05
1.75
1.75
0.002
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
1.90
219.65
219.65
0.31
0.32
12.45
12.45
0.02
0.71
23.05
23.05
0.03
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.18
20.81
20.81
0.039
0.02
0.66
0.66
0.001
0.06
1.88
1.88
0.004
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.06
6.36
6.36
0.02
0.00
0.18
0.18
0.00
0.01
0.23
0.23
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.16
18.50
18.50
0.02
0.01
0.47
0.47
0.00
0.07
2.21
2.21
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
1.70
196.53
196.53
0.33
0.13
5.06
5.06
0.01
0.51
16.56
16.56
0.03
Pyrene
697
9,090
1.60
184.97
184.97
0.27
0.17
6.61
6.61
0.01
0.54
17.53
17.53
0.03
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
2.02
--
--
--
0.11
--
--
--
0.20
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 47 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT18-30
HT18-30
HT18-30
HT18-30-1030
HT18-30-3050
HT18-30-5070
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
1-3
3-5
5-7
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/gdry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
3.64
0.0364
--
--
4.11
0.0411
--
--
4.7
0.047
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.05
1.37
1.37
0.00
0.04
1.00
1.00
0.00
0.06
1.21
1.21
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.05
1.35
1.35
0.003
0.04
1.05
1.05
0.002
0.06
1.34
1.34
0.003
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.08
2.14
2.14
0.004
0.06
1.41
1.41
0.003
0.07
1.47
1.47
0.003
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.05
1.29
1.29
0.00
0.04
1.00
1.00
0.00
0.04
0.74
0.74
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.15
4.12
4.12
0.007
0.11
2.68
2.68
0.005
0.11
2.34
2.34
0.004
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.64
17.58
17.58
0.02
0.56
13.63
13.63
0.02
0.55
11.70
11.70
0.01
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.45
12.36
12.36
0.01
0.42
10.22
10.22
0.01
0.41
8.72
8.72
0.01
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.67
18.41
18.41
0.019
0.66
16.06
16.06
0.016
0.56
11.91
11.91
0.012
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.49
13.46
13.46
0.01
0.43
10.46
10.46
0.01
0.42
8.94
8.94
0.01
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.37
10.16
10.16
0.01
0.33
8.03
8.03
0.01
0.31
6.60
6.60
0.01
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.57
15.66
15.66
0.016
0.47
11.44
11.44
0.012
0.45
9.57
9.57
0.010
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.49
13.46
13.46
0.01
0.37
9.00
9.00
0.01
0.50
10.64
10.64
0.01
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.21
5.77
5.77
0.01
0.12
2.92
2.92
0.00
0.12
2.55
2.55
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
1.10
30.22
30.22
0.04
0.91
22.14
22.14
0.03
1.00
21.28
21.28
0.03
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
1.30
35.71
35.71
0.05
0.86
20.92
20.92
0.03
0.99
21.06
21.06
0.03
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.41
11.26
11.26
0.01
0.30
7.30
7.30
0.01
0.40
8.51
8.51
0.01
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.78
21.43
21.43
0.03
0.48
11.68
11.68
0.02
0.45
9.57
9.57
0.01
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.91
25.00
25.00
--
0.70
17.03
17.03
--
0.89
18.94
18.94
--
C2-Naphthalenes
510
~
0.75
20.60
20.60
0.04
0.39
9.49
9.49
0.02
0.63
13.40
13.40
0.03
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
2.60
71.43
71.43
0.10
1.80
43.80
43.80
0.06
2.10
44.68
44.68
0.06
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.27
7.42
7.42
0.01
0.21
5.11
5.11
0.00
0.26
5.53
5.53
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
1.20
32.97
32.97
0.04
0.84
20.44
20.44
0.03
0.88
18.72
18.72
0.02
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.80
21.98
21.98
0.02
0.58
14.11
14.11
0.01
0.72
15.32
15.32
0.02
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
2.60
71.43
71.43
0.12
1.20
29.20
29.20
0.05
1.30
27.66
27.66
0.05
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
2.80
76.92
76.92
0.09
2.00
48.66
48.66
0.06
2.30
48.94
48.94
0.06
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
3.30
90.66
90.66
0.14
1.70
41.36
41.36
0.06
1.60
34.04
34.04
0.05
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
2.10
57.69
57.69
0.06
1.50
36.50
36.50
0.04
1.80
38.30
38.30
0.04
Chrysene
844
826
0.92
25.27
25.27
0.03
0.78
18.98
18.98
0.02
0.77
16.38
16.38
0.02
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.14
3.85
3.85
0.003
0.12
2.92
2.92
0.003
0.11
2.34
2.34
0.002
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
1.70
46.70
46.70
0.07
1.50
36.50
36.50
0.05
1.30
27.66
27.66
0.04
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.12
3.30
3.30
0.006
0.10
2.36
2.36
0.004
0.09
1.98
1.98
0.004
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.03
0.85
0.85
0.00
0.04
0.88
0.88
0.00
0.04
0.94
0.94
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.16
4.40
4.40
0.00
0.14
3.41
3.41
0.00
0.12
2.55
2.55
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.98
26.92
26.92
0.05
0.78
18.98
18.98
0.03
0.74
15.74
15.74
0.03
Pyrene
697
9,090
1.20
32.97
32.97
0.05
1.10
26.76
26.76
0.04
1.00
21.28
21.28
0.03
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
1.08
--
--
--
0.67
--
--
--
0.61
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 48 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-30
HT18-31
HT18-31
Sample Name:
HT18-30-7010
HT18-31-SURF
HT18-31-0010
Sample Date:
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/25/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
7-10
0-0.5
0-1.3
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
ESBTU
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
3.63
0.0363
--
--
2.9
0.029
--
--
2.55
0.0255
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.17
4.68
4.68
0.01
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.17
4.68
4.68
0.010
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.000
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.000
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.11
3.03
3.03
0.006
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.000
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.06
1.54
1.54
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.05
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.25
6.89
6.89
0.012
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.09
0.09
0.000
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.90
24.79
24.79
0.03
0.01
0.27
0.27
0.00
0.01
0.55
0.55
0.00
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.72
19.83
19.83
0.02
0.01
0.23
0.23
0.00
0.01
0.51
0.51
0.00
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.91
25.07
25.07
0.026
0.02
0.59
0.59
0.001
0.03
1.10
1.10
0.001
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.66
18.18
18.18
0.02
0.01
0.18
0.18
0.00
0.02
0.82
0.82
0.00
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.49
13.50
13.50
0.01
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.00
0.02
0.75
0.75
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.76
20.94
20.94
0.021
0.01
0.38
0.38
0.000
0.02
0.86
0.86
0.001
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
1.10
30.30
30.30
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.55
0.55
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.30
8.26
8.26
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
2.80
77.13
77.13
0.10
0.01
0.45
0.45
0.00
0.03
0.98
0.98
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.25
6.89
6.89
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
2.60
71.63
71.63
0.11
0.01
0.34
0.34
0.00
0.02
0.82
0.82
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.91
25.07
25.07
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.36
0.36
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
1.20
33.06
33.06
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.33
0.33
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
2.30
63.36
63.36
--
0.01
0.34
0.34
"
0.02
0.75
0.75
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
2.20
60.61
60.61
0.12
0.01
0.38
0.38
0.00
0.02
0.71
0.71
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
5.50
151.52
151.52
0.20
0.01
0.45
0.45
0.00
0.03
1.14
1.14
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.48
13.22
13.22
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.24
0.24
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
1.70
46.83
46.83
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.59
0.59
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
1.70
46.83
46.83
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.47
0.47
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
3.90
107.44
107.44
0.18
0.02
0.69
0.69
0.00
0.04
1.45
1.45
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
6.50
179.06
179.06
0.22
0.01
0.38
0.38
0.00
0.02
0.90
0.90
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
3.80
104.68
104.68
0.16
0.03
1.14
1.14
0.00
0.05
1.84
1.84
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
4.80
132.23
132.23
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.67
0.67
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
1.40
38.57
38.57
0.05
0.01
0.45
0.45
0.00
0.03
1.14
1.14
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.19
5.23
5.23
0.005
0.00
0.09
0.09
0.000
0.00
0.18
0.18
0.000
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
2.20
60.61
60.61
0.09
0.02
0.79
0.79
0.00
0.05
2.04
2.04
0.00
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.17
4.68
4.68
0.009
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.000
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.000
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.08
2.31
2.31
0.01
0.00
0.04
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.09
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.19
5.23
5.23
0.01
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.00
0.01
0.51
0.51
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
1.30
35.81
35.81
0.06
0.01
0.38
0.38
0.00
0.02
0.86
0.86
0.00
Pyrene
697
9,090
1.90
52.34
52.34
0.08
0.01
0.45
0.45
0.00
0.04
1.37
1.37
0.00
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
1.89
"
--
--
0.01
--
--
--
0.03
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 49 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-31
HT18-31
HT18-31
Sample Name:
HT18-31-1025
HT18-31-2555
HT18-31-5565
Sample Date:
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
1.3-2.6
2.6-5.7
5.7-6.6
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
ESBTU
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
--
--
4.65
0.0465
--
"
0.218
0.00218
"
"
0.29
0.0029
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.34
0.34
0.000
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.30
0.30
0.00
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
"
0.00
0.00
0.00
"
0.00
0.00
0.00
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.34
0.34
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.42
9.03
9.03
0.01
0.01
5.50
5.50
0.01
0.00
0.83
0.83
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.00
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.31
0.00
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
"
"
0.01
"
"
"
0.01
"
"
"
0.00
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 50 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-32
HT18-32
HT18-32
Sample Name:
HT18-32-SURF
HT18-32-SURF-FD
HT18-32-0010
Sample Date:
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/24/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
ESBTU
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
wt.
jig/goc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
2.18
0.0218
--
--
2.33
0.0233
--
--
1.67
0.0167
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.19
0.00
0.01
0.35
0.35
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.000
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.000
0.01
0.38
0.38
0.001
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.00
0.05
0.05
0.000
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.000
0.00
0.24
0.24
0.000
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.00
0.04
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.25
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.000
0.01
0.43
0.43
0.001
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.01
0.26
0.26
0.00
0.02
0.86
0.86
0.00
0.04
2.57
2.57
0.00
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.00
0.11
0.11
0.00
0.01
0.43
0.43
0.00
0.04
2.28
2.28
0.00
B enzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.01
0.41
0.41
0.000
0.03
1.37
1.37
0.001
0.05
3.23
3.23
0.003
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.00
0.01
0.36
0.36
0.00
0.04
2.51
2.51
0.00
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.00
0.03
1.86
1.86
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.01
0.32
0.32
0.000
0.02
0.90
0.90
0.001
0.04
2.57
2.57
0.003
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.64
0.64
0.00
0.04
2.22
2.22
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.66
0.66
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.01
0.44
0.44
0.00
0.03
1.37
1.37
0.00
0.08
4.85
4.85
0.01
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.49
0.49
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.01
0.32
0.32
0.00
0.02
1.03
1.03
0.00
0.05
3.17
3.17
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.52
0.52
0.00
0.03
1.50
1.50
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.52
0.52
0.00
0.02
1.02
1.02
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.01
0.36
0.36
"
0.02
1.03
1.03
"
0.06
3.53
3.53
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.01
0.35
0.35
0.00
0.02
0.94
0.94
0.00
0.03
1.74
1.74
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.01
0.46
0.46
0.00
0.03
1.46
1.46
0.00
0.08
4.79
4.79
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.36
0.36
0.00
0.01
0.84
0.84
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.52
0.52
0.00
0.03
1.92
1.92
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.60
0.60
0.00
0.04
2.34
2.34
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
0.01
0.64
0.64
0.00
0.04
1.80
1.80
0.00
0.05
3.23
3.23
0.01
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.01
0.39
0.39
0.00
0.03
1.29
1.29
0.00
0.08
4.73
4.73
0.01
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.02
0.83
0.83
0.00
0.07
3.00
3.00
0.00
0.07
4.37
4.37
0.01
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
--
0.01
0.32
0.32
0.00
0.02
0.86
0.86
0.00
0.06
3.59
3.59
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.01
0.37
0.37
0.00
0.03
1.16
1.16
0.00
0.06
3.65
3.65
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.00
0.08
0.08
0.000
0.01
0.23
0.23
0.000
0.01
0.60
0.60
0.001
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.02
0.69
0.69
0.00
0.05
2.32
2.32
0.00
0.11
6.59
6.59
0.01
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.000
0.01
0.23
0.23
0.000
0.01
0.45
0.45
0.001
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.00
0.03
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.00
0.01
0.41
0.41
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.19
0.00
0.04
2.22
2.22
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.01
0.25
0.25
0.00
0.02
0.94
0.94
0.00
0.05
2.87
2.87
0.00
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.01
0.36
0.36
0.00
0.03
1.16
1.16
0.00
0.10
5.69
5.69
0.01
--
ESBTU FCVi
"
--
--
0.01
--
--
--
0.03
--
--
--
0.10
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 51 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-32
HT18-32
HT18-32
HT18-32
Sample Name:
HT18-32-0010-FD
HT18-32-1030
HT18-32-3050
HT18-32-5070
Sample Date:
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
Depth Interval (ft):
0-1
1-3
3-5
5-7
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Jlg/gOC
Jlg/g oc
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
ng/goc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
1.42
0.0142
--
--
0.805
0.00805
--
--
0.913
0.00913
--
--
1.44
0.0144
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.01
0.37
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.18
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.00
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.01
0.42
0.42
0.001
0.00
0.17
0.17
0.000
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.000
0.00
0.09
0.09
0.000
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.00
0.24
0.24
0.000
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.000
0.00
0.05
0.05
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.00
0.25
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.01
0.42
0.42
0.001
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
0.04
2.68
2.68
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.05
0.00
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.04
2.46
2.46
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Benzo [b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.05
3.59
3.59
0.004
0.00
0.45
0.45
0.000
0.00
0.25
0.25
0.000
0.00
0.19
0.19
0.000
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.04
2.75
2.75
0.00
0.00
0.40
0.40
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.15
0.00
Benzo [g,h,i]peiylene
1,095
648
0.03
2.04
2.04
0.00
0.00
0.52
0.52
0.00
0.00
0.26
0.26
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.20
0.00
Benzo [kjfluoranthene
981
1,220
0.04
2.75
2.75
0.003
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.04
2.75
2.75
0.00
0.01
0.83
0.83
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.33
0.33
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.01
0.70
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.08
5.49
5.49
0.01
0.01
1.37
1.37
0.00
0.01
0.84
0.84
0.00
0.01
0.62
0.62
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.05
3.59
3.59
0.01
0.01
1.20
1.20
0.00
0.01
0.82
0.82
0.00
0.01
0.83
0.83
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.03
1.90
1.90
0.00
0.01
0.81
0.81
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.02
1.34
1.34
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.06
4.30
4.30
"
0.01
1.37
1.37
"
0.01
0.84
0.84
"
0.01
0.59
0.59
"
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.03
1.97
1.97
0.00
0.01
1.01
1.01
0.00
0.01
0.72
0.72
0.00
0.01
0.52
0.52
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.08
5.63
5.63
0.01
0.02
2.11
2.11
0.00
0.02
1.75
1.75
0.00
0.02
1.32
1.32
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
~
0.02
1.06
1.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.03
2.32
2.32
0.00
0.01
0.86
0.86
0.00
0.00
0.49
0.49
0.00
0.01
0.38
0.38
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.04
2.75
2.75
0.00
0.01
0.99
0.99
0.00
0.01
0.66
0.66
0.00
0.01
0.46
0.46
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
0.05
3.66
3.66
0.01
0.02
2.61
2.61
0.00
0.02
1.64
1.64
0.00
0.02
1.25
1.25
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.08
5.77
5.77
0.01
0.02
2.48
2.48
0.00
0.01
1.31
1.31
0.00
0.01
0.97
0.97
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.07
5.00
5.00
0.01
0.04
4.72
4.72
0.01
0.03
2.74
2.74
0.00
0.03
1.94
1.94
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
--
0.06
4.51
4.51
0.00
0.01
1.61
1.61
0.00
0.01
0.95
0.95
0.00
0.01
0.69
0.69
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.06
3.87
3.87
0.00
0.01
0.72
0.72
0.00
0.00
0.43
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.34
0.34
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.01
0.68
0.68
0.001
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.10
6.69
6.69
0.01
0.00
0.41
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.27
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.28
0.28
0.00
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.01
0.50
0.50
0.001
0.00
0.14
0.14
0.000
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.000
0.00
0.08
0.08
0.000
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.00
0.35
0.35
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.03
2.25
2.25
0.00
0.01
1.24
1.24
0.00
0.01
0.70
0.70
0.00
0.01
0.40
0.40
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.04
2.89
2.89
0.00
0.00
0.34
0.34
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.33
0.33
0.00
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.09
5.99
5.99
0.01
0.00
0.52
0.52
0.00
0.00
0.34
0.34
0.00
0.00
0.28
0.28
0.00
--
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.11
"
--
--
0.03
"
--
--
0.02
"
--
--
0.02
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
I:\WO\START3\451\41807TBL3-4.XLS
1 of 1
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 52 of 52
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-2 ESBTUs FOR SEM/AVS METALS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT 18-01
HT18-01
HT 18-02
HT18-03
HT 18-04
HT18-05
HT 18-06
Sample Name:
HT18-01-SURF
HT18-01-SURF-FD
HT18-02-SURF
HT18-03-SURF
HT18-04-SURF
HT18-05-SURF
HT18-06-SURF
Sample Date:
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
0.47
0.32
0.12
0.22
0.12
0.22
0.32
I SEM
(imole/g dry
1.7990
1.9264
1.5691
8.0521
1.2453
5.6741
3.3231
AVS
(imole/g dry
3.8
5.9
12.8
37.5
10.4
25.8
10.5
foe
fraction
0.0299
0.0293
0.0234
0.0531
0.0177
0.0418
0.0476
(I SEM - AVS) / foe
(imole/g dry
-67
-136
-480
-555
-517
-481
-151
NOTES:
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio,
lioldcd and shaded \ allies exceed 130 finiole/",„
(imole/g dry = micromole per gram dry weight basis.
AVS = Acid Volatile Sulfides.
foe = fraction organic carbon.
FD = Field Duplicate.
SEM = Simultaneously Extracted Metals.
Qualifier:
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 5
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-2 ESBTUs FOR SEM/AVS METALS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT 18-07
HT18-08
HT 18-09
HT18-10
HT18-11
HT18-12
Sample Name:
HT18-07-SURF
HT18-08-SURF
HT18-09-SURF
HT18-10-SURF
HT18-11-SURF
HT18-12-SURF
Sample Date:
10/29/2018
10/22/2018
10/22/2018
10/22/2018
10/22/2018
10/22/2018
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
0.32
0.20
0.24
1.10
0.33
0.18
I SEM
(imole/g dry
1.7298
2.7021
2.2683
0.5070
2.6390
2.9690
AVS
(imole/g dry
5.3
14
9.3
0.47 J
8
16.3
foe
fraction
0.0192
0.0345
0.0415
0.0023
0.0495
0.0275
(I SEM - AVS) / foe
(imole/g dry
-186
-327
-169
16
-108
-485
NOTES:
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio,
liolded and shaded \ allies exceed 130 jiiiiole/",,,.
(imole/g dry = micromole per gram dry weight basis.
AVS = Acid Volatile Sulfides.
foe = fraction organic carbon.
FD = Field Duplicate.
SEM = Simultaneously Extracted Metals.
Qualifier:
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 5
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-2 ESBTUs FOR SEM/AVS METALS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-12
HT18-13
HT18-14
HT18-15
HT18-16
HT18-17
HT18-18
Sample Name:
HT18-12-SURF-FD
HT18-13-SURF
HT18-14-SURF
HT18-15-SURF
HT18-16-SURF
HT18-17-SURF
HT18-18-SURF
Sample Date:
10/22/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
0.16
0.30
--
0.23
0.25
1.09
0.29
I SEM
(imole/g dry
3.8421
2.1899
1.1339
0.7589
1.6032
0.4572
1.4741
AVS
(imole/g dry
23.4
7.6
0.71 U
3.3
6.5
0.41 J
5.1
foe
fraction
0.0274
0.0332
0.0173
0.0133
0.0336
0.0062
0.0311
(I SEM - AVS) / foe
(imole/g dry
-714
-163
25
-191
-146
8
-117
NOTES:
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio,
lioldcd and shaded \ allies exceed 130 finiole/",„
(imole/g dry = micromole per gram dry weight basis.
AVS = Acid Volatile Sulfides.
foe = fraction organic carbon.
FD = Field Duplicate.
SEM = Simultaneously Extracted Metals.
Qualifier:
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 5
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-2 ESBTUs FOR SEM/AVS METALS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-19
HT18-20
HT 18-21
HT18-23
HT 18-24
HT18-25
HT 18-26
Sample Name:
HT18-19-SURF
HT18-20-SURF
HT18-21-SURF
HT18-23-SURF
HT18-24-SURF
HT18-25-SURF
HT18-26-SURF
Sample Date:
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/24/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
1.29
0.24
0.51
0.17
0.24
0.26
0.81
I SEM
(imole/g dry
1.4244
1.7373
1.2615
2.2853
1.6237
2.4759
2.3987
AVS
(imole/g dry
1.1
7.2
2.5
13.5
6.8
9.4
3
foe
fraction
0.0081
0.0167
0.0226
0.0330
0.0267
0.0356
0.0137
(I SEM - AVS) / foe
(imole/g dry
40
-327
-55
-340
-194
-194
-44
NOTES:
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio,
lioldcd and shaded \ allies exceed 130 finiole/",„
(imole/g dry = micromole per gram dry weight basis.
AVS = Acid Volatile Sulfides.
foe = fraction organic carbon.
FD = Field Duplicate.
SEM = Simultaneously Extracted Metals.
Qualifier:
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 5
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-2 ESBTUs FOR SEM/AVS METALS, HT
62561.36
Location ID:
HT18-29
HT18-30
HT18-31
HT18-32
HT 18-32
Sample Name:
HT18-29-SURF
HT18-30-SURF
HT 18-31-SURF
HT18-32-SURF
HT18-32-SURF-FD
Sample Date:
10/22/2018
10/22/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
0.96
0.28
0.30
0.09
0.09
I SEM
(imole/g dry
0.9830
2.4299
1.4321
1.5078
1.2665
AVS
(imole/g dry
1
8.4
4.8
16.4
14.5
foe
fraction
0.0094
0.0257
0.0290
0.0218
0.0233
(I SEM - AVS) / foe
(imole/g dry
-2
-232
-116
-683
-568
NOTES:
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio,
liolded and shaded \ allies exceed 130 fimole/ji,,,
(imole/g dry = micromole per gram dry weight basis.
AVS = Acid Volatile Sulfides.
foe = fraction organic carbon.
FD = Field Duplicate.
SEM = Simultaneously Extracted Metals.
Qualifier:
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 5 of 5
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 5-1 PEC-Qs, HT
EA Project No.: 62561.36
PI C -Q l ohil
PI C -Q
I7PAIIs M)=
Toi;il PC lis
IIK'illl PI C -
Locution II)
Heltl Siimplo II)
iiu'iiii PI C -Q mcliils
1/2
M)=0
Q
HT 18-01
HT18-01-0010
0.23
0.16
0.07
0.16
HT 18-01
HT18-01-1030
0.25
0.16
0.11
0.18
HT 18-01
HT18-01-3050
0.26
0.12
0.14
0.17
HT 18-01
HT18-01-5070
0.18
0.06
0.00
0.08
HT 18-01
HT18-01-5070-FD
0.20
0.24
0.00
0.15
HT 18-01
HT18-01-7085
0.11
0.10
0.00
0.07
HT 18-01
HT18-01-SURF
0.32
0.11
0.05
0.16
HT 18-01
HT18-01-SURF-FD
0.28
0.07
0.05
0.13
HT 18-02
HT18-02-0010
0.27
0.09
0.07
0.15
HT 18-02
HT18-02-1030
0.17
0.12
0.00
0.10
HT 18-02
HT18-02-3060
0.25
0.60
0.00
0.28
HT 18-02
HT18-02-6080
0.32
0.53
0.00
0.28
HT 18-02
HT18-02-8090
0.10
0.21
0.00
0.10
HT 18-02
HT18-02-SURF
0.27
0.14
0.05
0.15
HT 18-03
HT18-03-0010
0.86
0.71
0.67
0.75
HT 18-03
HT18-03-1030
1.79
0.64
2.80
1.74
HT 18-03
HT18-03-1030-FD
1.77
0.65
4.29
2.24
HT 18-03
HT18-03-3045
2.07
0.52
1.48
1.36
HT 18-03
HT18-03-4560
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.07
HT 18-03
HT18-03-SURF
0.75
0.43
0.33
0.50
HT 18-04
HT18-04-0005
0.11
0.01
0.01
0.04
HT 18-04
HT18-04-0530
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.05
HT 18-04
HT18-04-0530-FD
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.04
HT 18-04
HT18-04-3040
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.03
HT 18-04
HT18-04-SURF
0.19
0.02
0.02
0.08
HT 18-05
HT18-05-0010
0.34
0.13
0.14
0.21
HT 18-05
HT18-05-1030
0.52
0.21
0.31
0.34
HT 18-05
HT18-05-3050
1.28
0.98
2.62
1.62
HT 18-05
HT18-05-5060
0.62
0.68
0.62
0.64
HT 18-05
HT18-05-SURF
0.58
0.45
0.14
0.39
HT 18-06
HT18-06-0010
0.37
0.07
0.14
0.19
HT 18-06
HT18-06-1030
0.42
0.10
0.48
0.34
HT 18-06
HT18-06-1030-FD
0.41
0.08
0.26
0.25
HT 18-06
HT18-06-3060
0.98
0.31
1.05
0.78
HT 18-06
HT18-06-6070
0.67
0.31
1.72
0.90
HT 18-06
HT18-06-7080
1.01
0.35
8.88
3.41
HT 18-06
HT18-06-8010
1.00
0.37
1.58
0.98
HT 18-06
HT18-06-SURF
0.32
0.07
0.09
0.16
HT 18-07
HT18-07-0020
0.13
0.14
0.49
0.25
HT 18-07
HT18-07-2050
1.17
0.31
2.37
1.28
HT 18-07
HT18-07-5070
0.69
0.27
1.07
0.68
HT 18-07
HT18-07-7090
1.15
0.29
0.31
0.58
HT 18-07
HT18-07-SURF
0.17
0.05
0.12
0.12
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 5-1 PEC-Qs, HT
EA Project No.: 62561.36
PI C -Q l ohil
PI C -Q
I7PAIIs M)=
Toi;il PC lis
IIK'illl PI C -
Locution II)
I'ioltl Siiinplo II)
iiu'iiii PI C -Q mcliils
1/2
M)=0
Q
HT 18-08
HT18-08-0010
0.33
0.09
0.04
0.15
HT 18-08
HT18-08-1020
0.42
0.51
0.11
0.35
HT 18-08
HT18-08-1020-FD
0.36
0.39
0.08
0.28
HT 18-08
HT18-08-2045
0.65
3.78
0.02
1.48
HT 18-08
HT18-08-4565
0.17
0.03
0.00
0.07
HT 18-08
HT18-08-6580
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.03
HT 18-08
HT18-08-SURF
0.31
0.08
0.05
0.15
HT 18-09
HT18-09-0010
0.42
0.12
0.04
0.20
HT 18-09
HT18-09-1030
0.34
0.13
0.10
0.19
HT 18-09
HT18-09-3050
0.35
0.07
0.12
0.18
HT 18-09
HT18-09-3050-FD
0.36
0.21
0.17
0.25
HT 18-09
HT18-09-5070
0.56
0.16
0.22
0.31
HT 18-09
HT18-09-7010
0.63
0.35
0.68
0.55
HT 18-09
HT18-09-SURF
0.27
0.09
0.07
0.14
HT18-10
HT18-10-0010
0.08
0.01
0.00
0.03
HT18-10
HT18-10-SURF
0.11
0.09
0.01
0.07
HT18-11
HT18-11-0010
0.31
0.06
0.06
0.14
HT18-11
HT18-11-1030
0.34
0.13
0.05
0.17
HT18-11
HT18-11-3050
0.18
0.07
0.09
0.11
HT18-11
HT18-11-5070
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.03
HT18-11
HT18-11-7010
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.03
HT18-11
HT18-11-SURF
0.32
0.07
0.02
0.14
HT18-12
HT18-12-0010
0.72
0.33
0.18
0.41
HT18-12
HT18-12-1030
1.03
0.68
0.32
0.68
HT18-12
HT18-12-3050
0.48
0.72
0.00
0.40
HT18-12
HT18-12-5070
0.13
0.01
0.00
0.05
HT18-12
HT18-12-7010
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.04
HT18-12
HT18-12-SURF
0.36
0.11
0.13
0.20
HT18-12
HT18-12-SURF-FD
0.39
0.10
0.14
0.21
HT18-13
HT18-13-0010
0.55
0.23
0.22
0.33
HT18-13
HT18-13-1030
1.04
0.29
0.12
0.48
HT18-13
HT18-13-3050
0.72
0.23
0.02
0.33
HT18-13
HT18-13-5060
0.37
0.11
0.00
0.16
HT18-13
HT18-13-6090
0.28
0.04
0.00
0.11
HT18-13
HT18-13-6090-FD
0.30
0.06
0.00
0.12
HT18-13
HT18-13-9010
0.10
0.04
0.00
0.05
HT18-13
HT18-13-SURF
0.37
0.04
0.04
0.15
HT18-14
HT18-14-0010
0.29
1.71
0.19
0.73
HT18-14
HT18-14-1020
0.26
0.22
0.02
0.17
HT18-14
HT18-14-SURF
0.14
0.08
0.03
0.08
HT18-15
HT18-15-0005
0.10
0.01
0.01
0.04
HT18-15
HT18-15-0530
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.07
HT18-15
HT18-15-3050
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.07
HT18-15
HT18-15-3050-FD
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.07
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 5-1 PEC-Qs, HT
EA Project No.: 62561.36
PI C -Q l ohil
PI C -Q
I7PAIIs M)=
Toi;il PC lis
iiK'iin PI C -
Locution II)
Heltl Siimplo II)
moiin PI C -Q mcliils
1/2
M)=0
Q
HT18-15
HT18-15-SURF
0.14
0.31
0.07
0.17
HT18-16
HT18-16-SURF
0.51
0.07
0.03
0.20
HT18-17
HT18-17-0010
0.19
0.01
0.00
0.07
HT18-17
HT18-17-1030
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.07
HT18-17
HT18-17-3050
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.07
HT18-17
HT18-17-SURF
0.14
0.02
0.02
0.06
HT18-18
HT18-18-0020
1.90
3.81
0.01
1.91
HT18-18
HT18-18-2030
0.20
0.01
0.00
0.07
HT18-18
HT18-18-3035
0.09
0.03
0.00
0.04
HT18-18
HT18-18-3555
0.31
0.00
0.00
0.10
HT18-18
HT18-18-SURF
0.36
0.19
0.04
0.19
HT18-19
HT18-19-0010
1.65
4.62
0.00
2.09
HT18-19
HT18-19-1020
0.25
1.97
0.00
0.74
HT18-19
HT18-19-2030
0.09
0.02
0.00
0.04
HT18-19
HT18-19-SURF
0.20
0.61
0.03
0.28
HT 18-20
HT18-20-0010
0.41
0.23
0.31
0.32
HT 18-20
HT18-20-1020
0.20
0.01
0.00
0.07
HT 18-20
HT18-20-2030
0.10
0.02
0.00
0.04
HT 18-20
HT18-20-2030-FD
0.10
0.04
0.00
0.05
HT 18-20
HT18-20-SURF
0.25
0.19
0.02
0.16
HT 18-21
HT18-21-0015
0.37
0.05
0.04
0.15
HT 18-21
HT18-21-SURF
0.13
0.12
0.01
0.09
HT 18-23
HT18-23-0010
0.13
0.03
0.04
0.07
HT 18-23
HT18-23-1030
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.03
HT 18-23
HT18-23-3050
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.03
HT 18-23
HT18-23-5070
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.05
HT 18-23
HT18-23-7010
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.05
HT 18-23
HT18-23-SURF
0.36
0.11
0.02
0.16
HT 18-24
HT18-24-0010
0.10
0.20
0.00
0.10
HT 18-24
HT18-24-1025
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.04
HT 18-24
HT18-24-2550
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.05
HT 18-24
HT18-24-5065
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.03
HT 18-24
HT18-24-5065-FD
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.03
HT 18-24
HT18-24-6575
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.06
HT 18-24
HT18-24-SURF
0.39
0.38
0.04
0.27
HT 18-25
HT18-25-0010
0.80
0.83
0.03
0.55
HT 18-25
HT18-25-1030
1.61
1.56
0.00
1.06
HT 18-25
HT18-25-3040
0.88
5.15
0.00
2.01
HT 18-25
HT18-25-4070
0.12
0.01
0.00
0.04
HT 18-25
HT18-25-7010
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.04
HT 18-25
HT18-25-SURF
0.33
0.16
0.00
0.16
HT 18-26
HT18-26-0010
0.12
0.51
0.00
0.21
HT 18-26
HT18-26-1030
0.09
0.01
0.00
0.03
HT 18-26
HT18-26-3050
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.04
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 5-1 PEC-Qs, HT
EA Project No.: 62561.36
PI C -Q l ohil
PI C -Q
I7PAIIs M)=
Toi;il PC lis
IIK'illl PI C -
Locution II)
Heltl Siimplo II)
iiu'iiii PI C -Q mcliils
1/2
M)=0
Q
HT 18-26
HT18-26-3050-FD
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.04
HT 18-26
HT18-26-5070
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.04
HT 18-26
HT18-26-7010
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.04
HT 18-26
HT18-26-SURF
0.29
0.17
0.07
0.18
HT 18-27
HT18-27-0010
0.30
1.33
0.03
0.56
HT 18-27
HT18-27-1020
0.28
0.34
0.00
0.20
HT 18-29
HT18-29-0010
0.24
0.45
0.03
0.24
HT 18-29
HT18-29-SURF
0.21
0.40
0.04
0.22
HT18-30
HT18-30-0010
0.32
0.16
0.02
0.16
HT18-30
HT18-30-1030
0.92
0.37
0.18
0.49
HT18-30
HT18-30-3050
1.23
0.33
0.10
0.55
HT18-30
HT18-30-5070
1.24
0.30
0.10
0.55
HT18-30
HT18-30-7010
1.13
0.53
0.04
0.57
HT18-30
HT18-30-SURF
0.37
0.06
0.05
0.16
HT 18-31
HT18-31-0010
0.23
0.01
0.06
0.10
HT 18-31
HT18-31-1025
0.15
0.01
0.00
0.06
HT 18-31
HT18-31-2555
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.04
HT 18-31
HT18-31-5565
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.05
HT 18-31
HT18-31-SURF
0.31
0.01
0.03
0.12
HT 18-32
HT18-32-0010
0.21
0.03
0.03
0.09
HT 18-32
HT18-32-0010-FD
0.24
0.02
0.03
0.10
HT 18-32
HT18-32-1030
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.04
HT 18-32
HT18-32-3050
0.16
0.00
0.00
0.05
HT 18-32
HT18-32-5070
0.16
0.00
0.00
0.06
HT 18-32
HT18-32-SURF
0.53
0.00
0.01
0.18
HT 18-32
HT18-32-SURF-FD
0.28
0.01
0.03
0.11
NOTES:
FD = Field Duplicate.
ND = Non Detect.
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
PEC-Q = Probable effects concentration quotient.
Mean PEC-Q = mean PEC-Q metals + PEC-Q Total 17PAHs + PEC-Q Total PCBs/3.
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
TABLE 6-1 Harbortown Hot Spot PECs
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC 62561.36
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Location ID:
HT18-01
HT18-02
HT 18-03
HT 18-04
HT 18-05
HT18-06
HT 18-07
HT18-08
HT 18-09
Analyte
PEC
PAHs (jig/kg)
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
22800
5570
13693
16202
490.35
22260
8515
7112
86080
7898
PCB Aroclors (jig/kg)
Total PCBs ND=0
676
93
48
2900
11
1770
6000
1600
75
460
Metals (mg/kg)
Arsenic
33
10.1
8.3
11.6
5.3
10.4
11.1
9.4
34.1
12
Cadmium
4.98
1.4
1.1 U
25.1
0.8 U
8.3
12
16.2
1.9
5
Chromium
111
26.3
23.1
232
15.6
100
117
134
31.9
53
Copper
149
32.4
69.9
196
19.2
162
100
124
143
64.5
Iron
40000
22100
19700
23200
13100
26300
26000
19400
25600
28700
Lead
128
55
85.4
502
15.4
461
317
248
175
125 J
Mercury
1.06
0.12 U
0.23 J
1.5 J
0.13 U
1.2 J
0.96
0.65
1.3
0.67
Nickel
48.6
29.7
28.8
101
17.9
61.5
78.9
55.2
40.2
53.5
Silver
2.2
2.7 U
2.2 U
4.8
1.6 U
1.8
2.9
3.3
1.2 U
2.8 U
Zinc
459
119
121
1010
70.9
715
584
659
287
274
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines,
Recommendations for Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732
2003, WDNR December 2003.
Bolded and shaded detected values > PEC screening value.
Bolded and shaded detected values > 2X PEC screening value.
Bolded and shaded detected values > 3X PEC screening value.
NOTES:
(ig/kg = micrograms per kilogram,
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram.
PAH = Poly cyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
PCB = Poly chlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater
Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 3
Site Characterization Report
-------
TABLE 6-1 Harbortown Hot Spot PECs
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC 62561.36
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Location ID:
HT18-10
HT18-11
HT18-12
HT18-14
HT18-15
HT18-16
HT18-17
HT18-18
HT18-19
HT18-20
HT18-21
HT 18-23
HT 18-24
Analyte
PEC
PAHs (jig/kg)
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
22800
2071.1
2925.9
16470
38970
6964
1637.9
440.9
86820
105330
5205
2738.8
2620.4
8741
PCB Aroclors (jig/kg)
Total PCBs ND=0
676
8.2
58
218
130
49
18
11
24
22
210
25
24
29
Metals (mg/kg)
Arsenic
33
2.5
9.1
11.1
6.2
9.8
5.2
9.3
9.8
11.4
5.5
5.1
8
5.9
Cadmium
4.98
0.53 U
1.3
9.1
2.6
0.7 U
1.2
0.48 U
14.4
10.8
3.7
0.56 U
1.3 U
0.92 U
Chromium
111
11.7
32.3
82.9
28.4
21.2
39.6
18.6
36.7
35.1
27.6
96.8
29.5
19.8
Copper
149
5
45.6
156
40.7
19.5
44.3
18.2
302
274
125
26.5
41.2
51
Iron
40000
6750
25700
21800
15600
20600
15700
19600
21200
16100
21100
21100
23900
19000
Lead
128
22.9 J-
49.4 J-
306
93.5
13.6 J
288 J
22.2 J
623 J
624
157
143
41.4 J
45.5 J
Mercury
1.06
0.11 U
0.21
0.8
0.13 J
0.12 R
0.11 J
0.13 U
4.8 J-
3.5 J-
0.19 J-
0.059 J
0.29 U
1.4
Nickel
48.6
7.5
36.3
54
17.6
26
43.8
25.1
42.7
36.7
27.2
8.5
34.3
24.8
Silver
2.2
1.1 U
1 U
1.1 J
1.1 U
1.4 U
0.16 J
1 U
2.6
1.9
1.5 U
1.1 U
2.6 U
1.8 U
Zinc
459
26.6
167
535
121
68.6
139
51.3
772
769
108
46.7
146
133
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines,
Recommendations for Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732
2003, WDNR December 2003.
Bolded and shaded detected values > PEC screening value.
Bolded and shaded detected values > 2X PEC screening value.
Bolded and shaded detected values > 3X PEC screening value.
NOTES:
(ig/kg = micrograms per kilogram,
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram.
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater
Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 3
Site Characterization Report
-------
TABLE 6-1 Harbortown Hot Spot PECs
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC 62561.36
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Location ID:
HT18-25
HT18-26
HT 18-27
HT18-29
HT18-30
HT18-31
HT 18-32
Analyte
PEC
PAHs (jig/kg)
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
22800
117500
11712
30426
10179
12100
297.5
595.9
PCB Aroclors (jig/kg)
Total PCBs ND=0
676
21.3
50
18
25
120
41
23.6
Metals (mg/kg)
Arsenic
33
12.8
4.2
8.1
7.3
13.6
10.6
7
Cadmium
4.98
10.3
1.8
0.55 J
0.58
20
1.2 U
0.89
Chromium
111
76.3
21.7
38.5
21.3
160
26.6
23.3
Copper
149
217
35.1
25.9
36.6
134
30
27.1
Iron
40000
22000
11200
24400
11500
27000
23700
19700
Lead
128
524
113 J
52.1
98.7 J-
252
21.1 J-
26.6
Mercury
1.06
3.4 J-
0.16 U
0.3
0.17
1.2
0.17 J
2.8
Nickel
48.6
39.4
19.8
48.8
10.8
53.6
33.1
30.8
Silver
2.2
3
1.2 U
1.1 U
1 U
2.2 U
2.3 U
1.5 U
Zinc
459
837
137
98.5
96.3
532
93.6
103
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines,
Recommendations for Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732
2003, WDNR December 2003.
Bolded and shaded detected values > PEC screening value.
Bolded and shaded detected values > 2X PEC screening value.
Bolded and shaded detected values > 3X PEC screening value.
NOTES:
(ig/kg = micrograms per kilogram,
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram.
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater
Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 3
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 6-2 Hot Spot PAH ESBTUs
62561.36
HT18-01
HT18-02
HT18-03
HT 18-04
HT18-05
HT 18-06
HT18-07
HT 18-08
HT18-09
HT18-10
Analyte
PAH ESBTUs
1.23
2.75
1.17
0.07
1.55
3.50
1.32
3.83
0.98
1.83
HT18-11
HT18-12
HT18-13
HT18-14
HT18-15
HT18-16
HT18-17
HT18-18
HT18-19
HT 18-20
Analyte
PAH ESBTUs
0.20
1.96
1.28
4.16
0.95
0.09
0.14
4.07
10.08
1.75
HT18-21
HT 18-23
HT 18-24
HT 18-25
HT18-26
HT 18-27
HT18-29
HT18-30
HT18-31
HT 18-32
Analyte
PAH ESBTUs
0.43
0.15
0.98
3.95
2.61
4.05
2.02
1.89
0.03
0.11
Bolded and shaded values 1< ESBTU < 7.5.
Bolded and shaded values 7.5 < ESBTU < 10.
Bolded and shaded values > 10 ESBTU.
NOTES:
ESBTU = Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmark Toxic Unit
PAH = Poly cyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 1
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 6-3 Harbortown Hot Spot PEC-Qs
62561.36
HT18-01
HT 18-02
HT18-03
HT 18-04
HT18-05
HT 18-06
HT18-07
HT 18-08
HT18-09
HT18-10
Analyte
PEC-Qs
0.08
0.10
0.07
0.08
1.62
3.41
1.28
0.07
0.55
0.07
HT18-11
HT18-12
HT18-13
HT18-14
HT18-15
HT18-16
HT18-17
HT18-18
HT18-19
HT 18-20
Analyte
PEC-Qs
0.03
0.05
0.05
0.08
0.07
0.20
0.07
0.07
0.04
0.07
HT18-21 HT 18-23
HT 18-24
HT 18-25
HT18-26
HT 18-27
HT18-29
HT18-30
HT18-31
HT 18-32
Analyte
PEC-Qs
0.09 0.05
0.06
0.04
0.04
0.56
0.24
0.57
0.10
0.10
Bolded and shaded values 0.5 < PECQ < 1.
Bolded and shaded values 1 < PECQ < 5.
Bolded and shaded values > 5 PECQ.
NOTES:
HT = Harbortown
PAH = Poly cyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
PEC-Q = Probable effects concentration quotient.
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 1
Site Characterization Report
-------
Appendix A
Field Logbooks and Data Collection Forms
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
Al. Field Team Lead Logbook
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
TRIGONOMETRIC FORMULAS
.j .—. ~
f, t,., ». I>, 'I, '!/ t -
Kith* fnirvH. " """ 1 Wuw Tr.uiiiMCi " * ~~
Solution of Right "Vsaj'i'W.s
! , £•
r \rrnk ^ \i_, - ( v,i. - ,u -- »"• - - ~ t,
oive u
j:
at £>, c
tsn A «-x* * coc c»Vatl + ^*av 1 +
.lo | 4 ;.\ u Tt»<> - ^ - 71 .o--,- < i • '/>
I Is € v
i ,j H i i ,h i i» t . i n. 1 . - ~~
¦ ' i t sai «.,
a h f fit a c I J§ ® 90® - A, a « & too. A, c * •" '""V"
" ' '¦ " i; ilUA /'1> ,
^ i - , a • >xr i B % s'm ,* £< .>>i 'i
Solution of Oblique Triangles
Gives Required . ^
t »j it * in L- <,»,., f>\,, -"^
A"°" o.t.v B itm.it smA
A, a, I' J, c, C sin 1 = IkSBJk, C *» 180® - (A +1), c =
A . iu> ¦ \ an - ^ 1 4 i11 = '
:Auai.
sir t
4 rt>( i M-, J-a , . 1
t \rt\f i «;c,t -'•' -l-
A.B. C, a to was-^-SSi3
-------
ip/ibs/m
omo c
*
r
-V
>u %(&
mh/iB
he
I
-------
€>. . SKLs m..:~s.itic ; l.
Iftffl
jJfc AKOf;
(\Jb cjbooo
-------
kzs-feBv
-------
\; /
\
/
/
—
A
-
-------
A2. Core Processing Logbook
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
¦
-------
-------
Ill
¦
-------
LOCStiOf
Oroieci ,
Rs
il?00. \ 2 3;.
"T0j":
• ^€S
jH^O.
¦¦¦GoHrg£j%^*-r&-iy ' :
^1* :
;*
»l4,i
Project / Client -£Mc. Hz.
ISSS ope&4i$~ * |iC IS...*-?. .
r
O'Ht"
WO
• yr
r ho-[
s*
,r\.
UP- j 1
v 5 <5^
ig^2r-r
> p-i
' » w
>C
jdsft
£ ;.^^c • • CciM.
A©re .. \
11-H& ..^g?Ke^- •• S«N
' Coffecn
(•too
t*-"® crnk"^'
t-j
' o -\ -
\-x-
-------
U :-c.fkite- iL. Dae
^.^_Z££_AjL—
=. jk|/<2: :'„v.c fe&tT 11
t / Client. £t£t. L*£.l _ IlJlIZ
-------
1
all
§¦1
I
¦
I
¦
-------
Locatior
or0.e=t ,
Ijto Cdlle&yP:
'W
¦cJtii"
Date
sjsctCiier.t £j&: A.fi
-------
'ijrf r5"'i£>'
J
&C1am. 1
I) J5| "jgAjf* -"jj iT"ljt^<\ rfS" "
... J'jll. j f.,^
• :»S' 'f
oq.L\& £Ic2/k^f;.: c^-4
. JTr
(J
I c?
rW
. .j.|v5A
....L „ ...^. . j
;
!
Cc>ite£i a"^
6-1
t
1-^
¦>
IlT ^
llplllll
Ion \L^€ ^ tm'li"' Date,.
::t / CHent
-------
A3. Core Collection Logbook
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
-------
-------
ent
V?*f... mAw c*.
. i^SS- Cattle,4" L(3i€, Ijft .
JiJ-5 f'f ,} nt-^r
Jl ^ J' Gtk^
w"^. «-^.#€m/
,,,- ::,/r i,-
^pdM/S a^P, .JciC^ir.fA.. .> \'-«-*l0
$¦ S* C<&& *5 - Ah wt "fj\ terfA {i%»
UcoCii #iac,..
»¦
T" 12," emed-
.. -A^;r
fS "h
UA>5 at#**. ,&v
,r\/ ."
, . fen.*!/ ,
[ *• ikct **$/mc>_-* nj*,f
ii$S~ G>iUxl", oot-z.. R"' ( lt>w-r--A,
m . /.€"
*^f / i? ¦f~4~
f/5
r€
h ng?
Ht /$-.o'"" *HWftj- i* Wa«T
-------
H T_ 1.L
9,
%&*+y . .. .
ife-k..
i? * ^ ^
• ' f i" • <" y ¦ ,•
i . ¦ • ' - 1
...f£i;€. ..If/ Aii~"i
0<\M
i&&L§i) i^p, Mt m, :ri^t
it'.. £si*~iird^d-.
dt^^rptcf- ./4£,dd:iir> . ..
'- A*p.hkl..5 elmvn.» O-t^Xoti
•' ''l •' 1 ''"-tj
-"M/'"f[. I'd- t«V(4"k..#- .
"** i1; *t.
1^4-15 $¦
- aJc>
S^-^Ms mr £?A. .
'"¦ .- '¦v" / • ^ -. .
.... - *v>_ /. ~ . s^: ^*K;^ (p.#-.
.
.¦¦¦'¦ ¦..¦¦¦•.¦
rfrf>r, _ _ .i - 1 1 i ¦
Jl^tf fej4l tirtcrr^/E?/\ 6±NP
__ I# f" C'\<*'r &
Hc.r£Mryj4i«rj47a^&«p*;;3r*,
BR>725Sf/i!fX?rasrH^K?!!"nawif«;s=s3
-------
I Lf-frit.on till. Date
I PfOWCf - Client '.tJUf
c lAcrr 14 t
I J..* .! „fel;
' ' '' " 1 ^ ' ' '**€&> pff/A'V Wisf
M^Ar\-Us grlA*}/.
Ii; • • 1 >" ; , ^ ^
{Hpo_ — k ^'^1^,5
^ " -i •. >%, i5/v *A~~ .
- 'C*
y- -¦ TU ...ipi^lU'ks
Iflip #*£, •fogr't.
.. |#.:..« c-ej ..-*¦¦
>1 ~ *'
. Cutkct ms/ms# ~
.!>
. - . * . , , i i i.
. 'VI-: V>v.
/J /—¦ /? ,r
,rf"
?£Y.
t***bpb
¦¦¦¦¦I
1.1
JV1S- -
Client „,,^J,illr:lctf
' '• ,<• • i " • ¦ '' ' "
¦ i J-.-l . »i ; -''¦'•"-'V ¦'¦¦¦' • : ^7: |
f&!i£^rdr.rie£Mw?kf^MW>szz*rir.nrrinWiWH c ;i
-------
-------
J2»ifsiL^ysp- , oa!e
M~#£..
; Cter!
Anc
. f ' - /J
l u?o
Location Oe^ Mimm.1J5
• ' "• f »• . / . ¦¦ .
¦¦ " , iV tjfr^ |£-J »"-A,
-------
isssezaaB^^
¥ r is
Lo;:afeIon .
%&¦>.£...i „ Data Ali fe-l'J-#.'!?
: ' «. ' > ¦ ¦ ' ;, . „• -P?
fxf- w>f*J- 5
!635"-
. »V'» III
' f9 / J?
jb.5.& £#l
' ##*..S^.TT^
r.&, Arf Srf^fi'
r£-c&"fl—
1 n ^ h''. *>. ft,p ;
i+rts-i.S"-' : . ^(7
j "¦¦-¦' ' *
||i|- J»WI p^<7'
-------
. 18
nation ...5.11 Dais M..fc2&li3
PmiKl'C5« Up _y IfSPj?
^ ...itofc^i imJ- M j4ji,r
01&: BA(tafP) m€;u
h fh ( £c&. SikisTh
. "-' ' '¦ !
WBGL
£.¦&i¦<*/§: *.?<£..-it). tfve/S,
.. ..%
! 5» • / ^ tX*aL^. .. I*»i... *M^ . ,. Wo
"" *• v ¦. " ,: " •' ,
Location
...^ii/#if:.H..I.. Data
Project/Cfie.'B ftp.
s
19
-------
ggaagggggg ^-
Location
&k;±. fiix
.^.%. ,....u3L
Project' Client
Date ilifflt/
'&XkJzuM
mpu 6W.5.
^""gf 5/If- ~fi- l.y^/wr. £;V
Qti .j-e.jpt,. ;
^° - Cs>ikd: .£sm.^ . <&,/¦( I# ff- filAs^
m .J€^d-s^.
^#s *p*- ^^4.Hf/gli:
I£> /.Sr... I- Am . 4&ti»#^ *,:
_£ji|l?^+" t.. £u.U
.>v j"
C*
„ vt- f.
S£m\& S'Uba .Gfl^y c°
.l?^.. Dtp.ocrr. to.. .
?!"J :Mt£itipA ffHS-U.
•' - f v . -, , ^ , '< t. :l6:% ,• LorciMOn
^26ft <&jfaojes\ " ScjJHO
eaSt .«£... C&ft..O*r.
r,
1 ¦¦ .¦:#¦*-
.. .
^1^-1 car*r,. |^^|- ^urfi,
/! '' ' 'If*/] . • r
Zf
Location ... Date 3-ff ftgST
Project> Cfeit*
^f S -u""i li*t'^ ^~'u
wt,>z .frmsm-sntm* smw^wwmw ¦eiv»*i»fc-:r» **u
mw¥%.m&:*vr.n7LWT»iwz*
-------
«
"¦¦' ¦• : v - 't, , • , ,V ;• ,.. /',. .
vi^4iM%i iii^A
si.lj-" iA
$, £&{k*± ^
f ¦''1 . ' ! "11 * •4 ' •' ' ^
... AA£'kifi, C,-vp.,
' Ail AlS Alt/rv#.
C .^i3
• - ¦ rtti' "' » ....t^-iJe ri£s-vimA^ %§Qi~
"' *' / f-m/:, JUr.^^ • , . 1 1 *•'
^Ativ.Ci «cyl, /' , ' • r'1 : ¦
Avlj.^5' &y. a^T
Urif-OS, o.^ 6mv/" £*%4»
'•l-fd/iil . , ft^L t~'
¦
i ,¦ -' > , '
..j^kidit, .. ¦'," I ..A l V
>em . |-k/
...^•r^ .ciAw^r.^.fP .uAel WwJC
P$6
X7«i
f/v./fe"' #-:if
Mp'i?#!, M U iMiie r i
fr f^'IW TtiWJfc i
:: ::¦: v::::^..^?
-^Offrs^ Cjr^k ^ ; ; ' ¦
.":)? ;#A, /^iW'x.+'
" 1 ¦ > •
* :Sr*U w&j .XMr&t~ ' ' . - - , A-fc
"* * ' •'•
..:.x..:;:L ife
Jj^MS • ¦: Z&f ktit' /HA**"*'- S-kiC-k
.. -iecdd!&s.'ktII 'iN^ "iw
'JtdA'v, 1%
/' r ¦•
V
r:
¦: I j
' "! ' 1 . - ft
-------
A4. Field Data Collection Forms
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
LITHOiOGtC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, £ Tt/cnnotogy, inc., PBC
Client Name arid Project Name
GLAE5
Harbortown - Upstream
Location/Boring Name
HT18- i
Sheet
1 or 1
1 Geologist Name/Signature
(__ jir'X
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
"> ¦> *'
8 Date/Time Collected
7"i ' r i'/t' Inli
Date/Time Processed
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Eciuipment Operator
EPA R/V Mudpjppy
S Latitude/Northing/Grid
u n v
9 Sed Surface Eieratiors
^ ^ iT
ft
-I , *4 (-f i
iSt \\!
10 Coordinate System
H NAD83 V NAVD88
3 Operator Name (License # if Required)
Joe Bonem
7 Longitude/Essling/Grid
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
ft ,
'H- / >»- MA ^ I-
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
'52 "f Sun^ClaudyiRam^f^, ^
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: _____ -ft barrel -in diameter
Cora- 10 -fl barrel * -in diameter Manual Pushfi/ibracor
Grab Sample: -ft x _____ -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (fl)
mc
-ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
14 Recovery (ft)
V
V i
15 % Recave
f ~r r
7 ,
0'
16 Location Notes
_____
Sample Interval
Interval
{Depth}
Recovery
ffi & %l
Description of Materials
Munsell Color, Wa'sfura; Density; Consiwmty (Other Remarks)
fppfflj
Code
\u ,vv e .vsN*»¦ 1 t \\ \.-'Aw -Wujtii
4 V<, tVvv^ /jKX-LL, 5
f k.
061€?
f?,H
hL
cm fih
G f
1
¦C t (\JL L
1 '
"3
• } 1 C ?
10 ",iC
C \S w
*%r.)
O-S ^ v-i.Vv „
(2. "¦' ' ' T\» • K, 1 -j
->
(V/
H L
V |
7' i,-cc
C's.y- ^ t'4
^ » „
Si it .-iu "><
* ^ *;¦ / > c. c-*~ - j
G,fc>
?»c
6t
Bl
mr*** *
>r -f'
T ircV^
>: "th
C\' "> A \c€, i
r •'-t HOlC J
'4 i
a"' \\
iN~4_» "> , f-1 k i Vj i *f -} iTKi L<
[ffTtL, 'i/i t G^j
j, ,i f \ "f ^
S-?'
r.5
F\L/
S j''l
-'n ft .
t c, t
\^c%
~\-\ V* v, |*V V v
i v 5? ' 4'^
,\A c '¦ a (.s mC
Inr
^ Kc
/ ' U. \e >h
C. f
TV,
-------
m
LITHDLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Lag
EA Engineering, Science. & Technology, inc., PfiC
Ciient Name and Project Name
GLAE5
Hartjortown - Upstream
Location/Boring Name
HT18- f\l
Sheet
1 of 1
Geologist Mama/Signature
S Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
' - * i " ' - 1 /
t h^ / r.f
f-
2 Drilling Subcontractor fEquipneAt Operator
EPA Rftf Mudpuppy
8 * LaiihjdsJ/Northinp/Grid
¦* rt «¦"» (j / } J I
8 Date/Time Collected
. 1* y> < lc CrrT-v v^, •- " 1
as
K\U.
1' - 1 '
2- Kf-H W C V* .
10
/A
f 111" l^l
I - f>
SC
-6.\'
;',t' l»v'i
¦A •' -S." IC
*> . t.z
^ " \ ^ ,*'s Vv- v. ^ ^ ' |
SC
n f,1
* * V
\jf \c*%
Vri*-t. (' ^ ^'-V- ,ri GO V'v
¦SjJ^ , iTC;.C^
(^r\^
i- u
2 i. ¦
•i/:'
1, Li i £¦ '«-*
S i (K, u; t U -i"*«.?-c u. , Y^lO
J 4
/ 0 T <£- 1 ^ ' *'•-{ T\; •< k, r- ^"
c-.s
-
-------
UTHQLOGiC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Scianm, & technology, Inc., PBC
1 Geologist Name/Signature
thrUj t h.ic i
Ciieni Name and Project Name
GLASS
Harbortowr - Upstream
S Project Number
Location'Soring Name
HT18- C 5
Sheet
of 1
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected
^ic't >,:inr
Date/Time Processed
.7ft .-f /w/! 55S
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
EPA RIM Hudpuppy
6 LnUtutle/Nurthi.ie'Grici
'-/ "i:" " j T '
9 Sod Surface Elevation
7.9
i - f ! 10 Coordinate System H NAD83 V
; O C ! V
3 Operator Name (License # if Required)
Joe Bonern
tyngitud c/i*astmg/G rid
' J - L~*A I""' '< V
4 Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: -ft barrel _____ -in diameter
(Core: ^^ -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push^ibracorelBonic
Grab Sample: -ft x -ft x
Other;
(Sample Collection Method;
NAVD88
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
¦>, Cxsistey (Other Remarks] Sample Interval (ppm)
uses
Code
C ^
i * ' '''!
S t. !~ . t
VN-\ 'OiNL- Vl 1 V V-aC 'x_. ^ !
•• i ... ^ *>
iV\; A , _i Mf'A ^ \ • s * I«' *—¦
r ,. Ts,» \)t, >\ , * "Hl- "\'i i-s Usl (,v , "
0
— :i '
- -K -J ~ , ! i > i { t < y"'1 * "'' ' ' - v''"n"
cL ^ \f-/"> ™"7 f \ ^ ^ t "
i ^ f J' ' V ( re, tf-i'k (\ir~i ' FT>
OL
Ll c1
1 i ' > 1
)4 iw
^ n^ / IV \> >^v% ^ Vv ty ,
^ f^,v"rt . t C
k '/ jJ t i' t ' - t:
:,.,l
H , t1-
t-1
).,S"
r 1 ^ 1- U'l! v'J'VvN - 1L1- c- /¦ / ,
i 1 ¦ - j J C,-' i
,, VV ^ l" '¦ ¦ ^ C 7 7 • • • '.a ^ _ C-'T
Lt /! H » iv Lrv, , '•!. f.-^
L H
(¦.Zn
0;35Ii'C^?
Vw- 4r> c«v'i \(,c_ "'7 s | !
l_—...1.111 i„L2 I. ^ um i n •>, .• i i-t i .r.< I
-------
UTHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, 8 technology, toe,, PBC
Client Name and Project Name
GIAES
Harbortown - Upstream
location/Boring Name
HT18> ' i
±
1 of 1
1 Geoiogist Name/Signature
E-'-i1'. f'U
U~~fcc::b-
5 Project Number
6256136
CORE COLLECTION INFO
LaMkiX/NorElirno/Grid
8 Date/Time Collected
C l I I flLj -i
DateHlme Processed
I:S 0;t > c/
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
EPA R/V Mutipuppy
:,ll:
Sod Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate Svstem
H NAD83 V NAVD88
3 Operator Name (License # if Required}
Joo Bonem
7 Longitujie/Eastirig/Grid
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
L
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direcEionj
4C^ ~f Sunny/CtoudyfRafn -a, ,'J <*
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rolosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: 10 -ft barrel
Grab Sample: -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
•in diameter Manual Push^ibracore^Soriic
¦ft x -ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
13 Boring Depth (ft)
/ A
o*
14 Recovery (ft)
15 % Recovery
16 Location Note?
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
(ft & %)
Description of Materials
M'.nseP Colnr, Moisture Density; Consistency jOitte1" Remarks}
Sample iD
Sample interval
PID
fppm.i
uses
Code
f l
1 V. m.tl\
I. . b - -
\1 -
l n
f-
Ir-f" ^ \ *
V" \.\t\
y -» r/.-v,
\ v-V %
^ % r v.
•• \ \ ^
'I*., A
j. c «
v** t_-K, it\ U, - f-~
——_
e >" t
. (•>
aZ
c
- f *
U»6?a
Sl» n^v(,
i * i*.
He.
dV w\~U
CinA t'ftu. C.U*
, \ *--v -t i «.•' C C
f fJ
» VvL, (
"i
$
• ,*>
^ £,/ S 'U>r k iW
L. ^
0'(r ¦
r i
r i
Wr
fi
L.t~
f a.'
"5- >
r-- /,
t .[ ^ *. J ,, . | " rt
b'*- c> hC t o'^1 ^ C v- C \ it -1
Ho
kj i
v; •'
/
!L
-------
tITHDLQGfC LOG
Sediment Collection Lag
EA Engineering, Science. ¦>>
15 % Recovery
< I /I
C, I j
Interval
(Depth)
i ' I
Recovery
(ft & %}
r. t
z
Description of Materials
Munsel, Color; Moisture; Density: Consistency iQtner Remarks!
Sample ID P1D
Sample Interval (pprnj
Vc? if in *vc
Sai-\^ >-1 S i \ i v-- , \ w Vs r- C,
^/s
-XW-\v
0
t'O 'O
6-1 1
L.
__
Ccxte
-7 T
r
L Vj\ ^
, "C, i_)
i - I - ¦">
*00*$ •
k
X)
»i-x (»•; -\l. i\i i ! 0
, 'i , J
- '~X. 4 r" "jL bC: j *•'
HI I I
Jriti/H
d t .a -V
lo3£
¦L7
f\I
Lj L—
kX\i"
1 ^
^sf
7P6 too
1 !H V-C UV'-J t\ iJyW y^\ i ,
-Vv liv-Ov- , ? i -- I -v v , ,
3 >'\d t L-
'7 'Ji,
5 i1
'• '"l*-" ur1 1>1
" N* ^ t.\k x S
t tr
I™*!"
' «¦ |[' ..«¦ "n
z\
/I. v7 ™
Of
5,0 5
1 I
y)( 1
I S
V /¦ ^ '
» 114-
-'I
i \d
>«r
A
M
• i O
"f CXCJC,
t l I
n-. I
X L1! \ '•> - r, (-
V it. >/1 i-V^,
jK v
c •
-------
gll LiTHOLOG!
Sediment Collection Lag
Em Engmenpg Science, & Technology. Inc., PBC
Client Name and Projori Name
GLAES
Harborfown - Upstream
Lorafion/Bnring Name
HT18- . "
Sheet
1 of 1
1 Gpologist Name/Signature
[ UUlli i f
f ,
5 Project Number
6236136
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected
m , m' 1 n v
Date/Time Processed
,V '
2 Drilling Subconiracfof/EqyipmenS Operator
EPA R/V Mudpuppy
6 _La!ilude?Northtng/Grid
9 Sad Surface Elevation \ ^ ft
10 Coordinate Sysfem H NAE83 V NAVD8S
11 Depth of Water, ft (siart/ond j j
i |
3 Operator Name {"License # If Required)
7 Longitudo/Easfing/Grid
ga°S7.Z8^58
hh "f
Sunny/Cloudy7Rain
a "ifityt f h
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Roiosonic: _____ -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: 10 -ft barrel 4
Grab Sample; -fl x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
in diameter Manual Push^braroTe^BoHic
¦ft x -ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
13 Boring Depth (ft) j 14 Recovery (tt)
JO ' q n
15 % Recover/
£i7°L
I C~ ftj
16 Location Notes
interval
(Depth)
Rccovary
(n & %)
Description of Materials Sample ID PID
Munseli Color Moisture; Density Consistent.!, |0lhcr Remarks) Sample Interval (ppm)
uses
Code
'** " (
1
S l,»;:V/<
I £>
'-vLv\ Ss i1 I „ . V h ^ V v. 1 o ^ CC 10
^ 1 ' ni-~ H | \ V'"1' ^
V 1
\i/ . iU 'j\j i
, (' 1(1 : W t - 1 ' -> 1
r' i r. j i '• l \ " ' f i
' . i i-a1 „ 1 '
{'[_
•V4"
31 toe) 7
¦¦ i.>
¦ v k> 5_'( \\ >•-, 'r(- , ^ C'A '' C-C •
\tJ ,v.i
fcs - >'i 1 < ; $/ ! . (
si
b - 7 !
i,r !or^
r \ vi L.i >• .fetU,'n-s nl-Hj-lIiid Vv. L'l '~+C '
1 ' \1 • ^ 5 n 4 S'tvcXC f.. .i fav,-Ur ii -
4 4 ; r >~1 t i »t *•»
x4\ L-~ Ad "i" , - 1 1 I .) p!
!•. ,li ¦h)/ t M t Al-< i v-x: •, 't1't,lu*1 l'* .1 -S , *f"
^'
j
J*" I
-------
LfTHOLOGIC LOO
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engine Bring, Science. & Technology, Inc.. PBC
Client Name and Project Name
GLAES
Harbortown - Upstream
Location/Boring Name
HT18- f"-.rz
Sheet
1 of 1
1 Geologist Name/Signaluie
^ \ -''VV
S Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
<¦» r\ ,,
¦jt ^
W"
8 Date/Time Collected
*-'! . t ! £ Juj>b
Date/Tims Processed
2(*cJ - : / ( < ~O
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
EPA Rf¥ Mudpuppy
6 J-atitud^f Northing/Grid
ll2c\ J-3
M
> t
Operator Name (License # If Required)
Joe Sonem
7 Congitude/Easting/Grid
' •"! V- >
10 Coordinate System
H NAD S3 V NAVD88
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
I ^ f
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Li S111
SunrtylCiouf^/Rain
Core: ^ -ft barrel ^ -in diameter Manual Push^/toracore^Sonic
Grab Sample: -ft x -ft x -ft Box/PonarA/an Veen/Other
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft)
((•-
Recove
fff & %)
14 Recovery (ft)
£
15 % Recovery
o
i
16 Location Notes
Interval
(Oeptn)
"£ "*&i \\^«
A
:
C (''20
M /\ TV< i<- 'onf-fiM
* u
sM
\,Z -
J-Vl
3,
V, i -\ "i ^ Sv>*~t V\ Vi'i \^v ^1-"'^. C.Ltwr
- ' >'\is'""'A
Hs fc-»" » c
i, h l- 'i; i ~c i .• k.
. c "x
\,S'
i ¦
in
k,, 0 ¦
2-2' \w%
VC-i if\Ai ^ I Wt \ a f -
^ i \ O & CVUl y i" c"cl
r
-V i T * '
jiVtl
"'1 C If I \*!
Wt ; It i-fif
CfO
Lj , CS 1 -
h
n
{s
i*rf' iot'7,-
v>" 1 \: "\ t, j\ J^s SJ" •" -
J vj
V"l v|d-i S -"Vu CCA1 C-, i h-,Kr\c
-------
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc., PBC
, Client Name and Project Name
C-U\ES
J1j^Qv-C±£x~ trj+iliL
Location/Boring Name
h 1 >
Li—La.
Sheet
i of
1 Geologist Name/Signature
:ivu
tu
irtc"
5 Project Number
tZSM3<
CORE COLLECTION INFO
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
t££iA
) ,'Hatitud^Jorthing/Grid
8 Date/Time Collected
Ui'^Joro/'Jx
Data/Time Processed
5 Ochjo / sc
9 Sed Surface Elevation
SbC.l--,
10 Coordinate System H NftTV-?v N'Weill
3 Operator Name {"License # If Required)
Joe Booem
' Longrtu&yEastmg.'Grid
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
Q,; ft
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction}
¦ C ;SHjnJpCIoucty/Hairi ^
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: -ft barrel __ -in diameter
Cora: ( Q -ft barrel H -in diameter Manual Pus h/V ibracqfo/Sonic
Grab Sample: -ft x -ft x -ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft)
\0 O
14 Recovery (ft)
B, o
15 % Recovery
e o%
16 Location Notes
Sample ID
Sample Interval
_
(ppm)
uses
Code
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
(ft & %)
-^rj
'd%
Description of Materials
Munsail Color, Moisture; Density, Consistency (Other Remarks)
ver-j ^ v V 1ajM^ i',W
CM
I 0H& H I | >t,rK circ
CO \ 0
o;i
%c:*s£ Cii- tW.w C^r U.VO'v111-
1 o zo
1 - l.V
C
s o
JL
Ku
% . totr/v
Vx^ iri, OUC, r-X '> vz-^Va VTCvCX. "¦> 'W,
ffvv |WViBV'S>. ^\drc C'¦ -"U: So'icV^C > \V S < |4(j
m \ ¦» "8^-c lo fas, -v-^.
r*. H/j
•b
it/
H5 fe>'
H.b S
*1.^
St
kS-fcc
5 iac'1
> \\t| Sc* <^CS.
it'YjZ- M/l "Pc; , cc Crrc
b'i 60'
B ol
v1- S
-------
UTHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
t:A Engineering, Science, & Technology, fric, PBC
Client Name ant) Project Name
Location/Boring Name
HTifc-C")
Sheel
i of I
1 Geologist Name/Signature
fr;m»\ j CA > A*-!
5 Project Number
I ?fc>
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected
ttUct30i'o/l[>iC'
Dafeffime Processed
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
C^foCecm
6 Latitude/Northing/Grid
nr zuB'uerNi
9 Sed Surface Elevation
5fc:i rt
10 Coordinate System H K,if\"D& 5 v MVDfrq
3 Operator Name {"License # If Required)
Joe Bonem
T Longitude/Eastiog/Grid
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/and)
*"?
• t
15 % Recovery
n
BoxlRgflaifflan Veen/Other
18 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
f ft&%)
Description _ _ (
Munsell Color, Moisture; Density, Consistent (Other Remarks) Sample Interval
F
(Pi
uses
Code
0 ' \
O
c
Via ^>AV vo.\V* VAHV iCX:40
<. i 0 Y R H11 ~i>{s r >*__ >5 v> c^v- ^ \'
1.
fit
s - >
.2' !o®%
, 1
V".\V\ Sxo^Cjc v oc V
? e :5 o
1 - 3l
Ml
x-5
I' lot J
• !> 0 *5 ^
1 4'* ^
Kt d;-C CivrY^f^ Cider"
!,Z
k\l
2' U'o&
CIgvmjJvi o> . VV Omd. *rre'
a-
H <_
a y\ rciv'^
OL"
:V1U-
-------
LITHOLGG1C LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Sciance. & Technology, Inc., P8C
Client Name and Project Name
CrLt\& . f. ^
Location/Boring Name
HT'i:-IC
Sheet
1 0f I
1 Geologist Name/Signature
CW
Project Number
(? 2S & 15b
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected
Date/Time Processed
210^2®% h'mzwm#! c/'io
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
(H/u
vVi
6 taffiuJfe/Northng/Grid
^'2i..Z£Ull'ki
3 Seel Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
H WtoK?v
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # IF Required)
Joe Booam
7 tongitotJe/EastinglGrid
f7'5? 7-t^iCc
'3- r.
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunfijifploudy/Rain y '¦ t vij.
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check Ons)
Rotosonic; -ft barrel -in diameter
Mcore: 5 -ft barrel ^ -in diameter Manual Pushfi&£ac^/Sonic
Grab Sample: -ft x -ft x -ft
Other;
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft)
14 Recovery (ft)
ICS
15 % Recovery
S v
Box/PonarA'an Veen/Other
16 Location Notes
"uses"
Cod©
Interval
Recovery
(ft A, %)
Description of Materials
Munsell Color; Moisture; Density Consistency (Oilier Remarks)
Sample ID
Sample Interval
PID
(ppmI
Q-\
l,0^" \cc%
(-1M- StkvV
K,>av\ -trtvc^ ck | c
eAv
\a4
oo s c
0.2.
-------
LITHOLGGIC LOG
Sodiment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
C-i^
Location/Boring Name Sheet
Hn 0> ~ii | of |
1 Geologist MameSignature
//
T/vi iAy ^ - -4-JfUTt cr o- ~
5 Project Number
CJ^C, Sni
CORE COLLECTION INFO1
8 Datofflme Collected Data/Time Processed
2JiCk\-$i)tbfi^Z\ Z* C-erMJi (j'SO
— - —^
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
.Mf; V
6 .Lat^pe/Northing/Grid
^i'S ;i'lC
9 Sed Surface Elevation ft
10 Coordinate System H M fit$3 V Ni
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
9.1
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
Joe flonem
? LftHgiJjje/Easfing/GricI
t r ?'?
12 Weather (femp, circle conditions, wind direction;
o £•' Sfuftiy/Cloudy/Rain
4
K
*
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: J ft -ft barrel ^ -in diameter Manual Push(Vibracor^/Son!c
Grab Sample: -tr5* -ft x -ft x -ft Box/PonarA/an Veen/Other
Other: A-/2>y'(£
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft)
| ( ,
14 Recovery (ft)
15 % Recovery
CN%
16 Location Notes
interval
(Depth)
Recovery
(ft & %)
Description
Minsell Color; Moisture; Density; Consistency {Other Retnate) Sample Interval (ppm)
uses
Code
0-v
V 1
VOc \ > \i v\VVv "Vvo-Lt- :?i Vcv n v six Vtc^ \ d
' C.Z
Mil lv)rnt t CM1 |
H\L
1 ' V
\ec7.
V^vH'v V/Nci ^ £ C o ^ ^
Ml
5-V
2'' \OU'%
\\ - V vSch V^L, <^a. —^ ;
Cv«A(^ XrikCZ^ anvd;r\Cj VO <-< (), I
^Vv .Wv*- >ai\ ^ "*>l\ tkif
Hl/
sn
S'l?1
2. It-XJ fy
SkWv-j Vw>\>i_ ^
\oXt~ M | \ W. c K, (LrrV »-\
¦SCso
s ¦?1 5- 2,
<
SH
*
z4' K&
lO H N^> ^ / \ "fcstfu'Siu Cixa^
0
7 ~1H1
Sr
-------
LITH01061C LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc. PBC
Client Name and Project Name,
GrL-ftt5
yi
Location/Boring Name
HT16-13.
Sheet
of J
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
, C-Uui:
8 Date/Time Collected
%pa-hDoi&/n2c
Date/Time Processed
Z56Lh^Dls//iTfD
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
L c te ( r'Wxf 1 nAi ¦
6 <"1^itad3?Noithirlj/Grid
*nr £ 1, 331 o l'5>' M
9 Sed Surface Elevation
5C-S/L
10 Coordinate System
,3 Operator Name (License # if Required)
Joe Bortcm
7 "Tongito^/EasiingfGrid
&Z°S&. CfH lO?V
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
M&foS vKiAy'£>ft£
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
c?^T" ^unnjttoudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
-in diameter Manual Push/tfibrac^i'Sonic
-ft x -ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
Other:
13 Boring Deplh (ft)
Core: \C) -ft barrel
Grab Sample: -ft x
14 Recovery (ft) 15 % Recovery
°\ -7
a,-
I tZ
16 Location Notes
Sample Collection Method:
Internal
(Depth)
Recovery
(ft & %)
~5«Bcripti^ of ^ToFiaT^
Mureell Goto; Moisture; Density; Consistency (Other Remans)
Sample ID
Sample Interval
P1D
fppm)
uses
Code
0-
T 100%
W-iV % v r'Y v'c.m
m Q0V\ * C
CC.r^ -y tls.^ \c
H |i Ca£*.
t>D ^c
(NvNlV
^\Cmx WCxGL \ OinuoljjC ^ 1
»¦ 9^W- ' ^ '
>4
V v 5 ixw tAjJo
•~l> N/, V t? \,^ Pi c\
IWUUrtvj
a I
sc
1\0
:VbC &'¦
V vA W1 -f-jr?
vjj
To p
22.9
CL
-------
UTHQLG6IC LOGj Client Name and Project Name
Sediment Collection Log GLAES
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc., P8C Harbortawrt - Upstream
1 Geologist Name'Signalure
( t>\Ji
Location,-'Boring Name
HUB- \;;
Sheet
1 of 1
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
£* - 1
"Mm
c
i ,
* ' *
yU.. <•
i/ i~
Ctrt-
8 Date/Time Collected
y\c:i C/IVr't,
Date/Time Processed
:x-t! i-yn
6 ^
5" Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
EPA R/V Muripyppy
'LatitudeiNorthing/Gnd
/¦/'•
9 Sed Surface Elevabon '•} t* ' ,
iV /Cji.-y f V -
10 Coordinate System H NAD83 V KAVD88
3 Operator Name (License # ff Required)
Joe Bonem
7 Longlkide/^as ting/Grid
it
11 Depth at Water, ft (stariiend)
Llk
C /-
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
IjH* r Sunny/Oo^iRam ^
A Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Roiosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
\iCoro:
13 Boring Depth (ft) 14 Recovery (ft)
-ft barrel 4
Grab Sample"
Other:
-fix
in diameter Manual Pusr^ibracore^Bortic
ft x -ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Olher
i.f
Q r '
i «¦ »c
15 % Recovery
%X
16 Location Notes
Sample Collection Method:
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
(ft & %}
Description of Materials Sample 10 P1D
Munsell Color; Moisture; Density; Consistency (Other Remarks) , Sample Interval fppm)
r~USCS_j
Code
i
1/ '
\l
Vv -j twv re tWi 4 i vv *>\ S c< CC\(_"
'3rvA\.' ¦ ¦xKri/',,
L Y\L Ll/i "0cn-6,nl/ l"'* 1
Hu
i - ?y
]' I oc;3
^ ( ¦ "i"^ ' ~ r 1 ¦' ¦- - -
%'^\\ \)si V"> i'- - i C r'.rvi- ^6 »ic| i \ " ~ i
r 1 j
V\vc^rjtpvr hen ccW- . . , ,r S°
Il If' "?/1 U-Oj*::- I" ^
"vA I
"t y L*>
f
+\ O
Z'
ji\V i<> i/VVv k ttj. ^ (Hi &>id
, , . „ ,
\\l H'/j t\>« \C.t7it>r ') - o
L
v;f (!i ^ trk *^ cc. i\i<}>¦ Kc\ • °
a"6 £|J"" Mm r''L":':
C,1
Cl
i 3.
:
v .c
IS ice),
•>, ?• \x ,s&",4 *''r*A
.Cin& \*\t* )vY^ <•''] C-^V'-W _ _ c 0 ,
3v.vv iii vAA ciicj S.K:'Js, i<- ') ^ .'/i r'f"H .°
•J!
r tu
St' -
t C
i
| |! O j {'l
Si IK h^cv.. -- w ^ •
-vwvva.v':, r'rj ^ '
, 1 C ^ ! \f >'.. >, > I Cpri
; i
-------
L1THOLOGIC LOG
Sedimeni Collection Log
EA Engineering, Serines. & Technology, Inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
GLAHS
Harborfown - Upstream
Location/Boring Name
1 of f
1 Geologist Name/Signature
L.i~yf > "U i ;
^ —
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
/
v-:
8 Dale/Time Collected
C: ,* ^ ("''i 'j
Date/Time Processed
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
EPA RIV Mud puppy
6 Latilude/Northing/Grid
S Sed Surface Elevation
fi'T.S. v (-
UP "9
' ' -
/ S ( : I u'
10 Coordinate System
NADS3 V MAVP8B
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
Joe Booam
7 longitucjefEasting/Grid
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
i 7. H
c
, 6 £
l\)
12 Wcathsr (T&mp, circle conditions, wind direction}
HH V" Sunnp'CioudyJRain^'
4 Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Chock One)
Rotosonic: -ft barrel _____ -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel 4
Grab Sample: -ft x
Other:
j Sample Collection Method:
¦in diameter Manual Push^ibracoro^Scnic
¦ft x -ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
13 Boring Depth (ft)
14 Recovery (ft! j 15 % Rucova-y
' * "** V?
I! t
! /
iF Location Notes
Interval
(Depth}
Recovery
(ft & %)
Description of Materials Sample ID ; PSD
Munsell Goto?:. Moisture; Derail]1; Consistency (Oter Remarks) Sample interval ' (ppm!
uses
Code
' "|.-H
|3'' I cc-fa
•' 5 t i'cV, 0 C tL
, ") 4
-W twawv*«-UC, C< v 16 rc-!''*pv„,c n'& -m ^ ^ # " •
iA»'\>lT\'in^rirv^ V\ v •* ** i
3r\
i * ^
c../ fo%
"^;y-K| CVc^ \ u,r
-------
UTHOLOG1C LOG
Sediment Collection Log
FA Engineering, Science. A Technology, Inc.. PCSC
Client Name and Project Name
GLAES
Harbortown - Upstream
Location/Boring Name
HT18- ;S
Sheet
1 of 1
1 Geologist Name/Signature
tP'hh^ L )(-u
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
EPA R/V Mudpuppy
6 l!atitut!eSlorthi!ig/Grid
HZe2l.Z\\'1X< X!
8 Dale/Time Collected
Dale/Time Processed
9 Serf Surface Elevation
¦SjQ.I
10 Coordinate System
H MAD83 V NAVD&8
3 Operator Name (License # IF Rsquiwd)
Joe Bonem
7 Loni
angituda^asting/Grid
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
IfWrf
0 7
i I
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
4 Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
i^-fcore: 10 -ft barrel 4
Grab Sample: -ft x
Other;
Sample Collection Method;
Wi; S £ Sunny/Cloucjjf/Rain
I
13 Boring Depth ('
IC I '"?L-
16 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
(HA%)
Description of Materials
Munsali Color, Moisture; Density; Consistency (Other Remarks)
Sample ID P1D
Sample Interval fppmj
uses
Code
,S 1007
~V-o CCi.riit -V.svtJ \,v i:VW (-(I'CS
t: 2,^ i'C i
C! Vc
.• k... Cft)
0'„
. /
01
q.r
iJw
IS too%
QU V- «Vk Vrfi-Cv
C'.rti wU'!) 0. r.- i!i rs,. c.
L -'^>:
|0o. S
C.H
*r tr
£
1 oo7v
Cl>") o. >\ v'v
-b
•\>
"SOSe
io -
¦ L'.-l
> \J
^bid
X-' ICQ?
J) C". O-^-' Ci is O, V? C
, „ ^ tli
C-H
-------
LiTBOLDGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
Efi Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
GLAES
Harbortown - Upstream
location/Boring Name Sheet
HTis-ja^1 HT'c'-i 11 ^ f
1 Geologist Narne/Signatuie
Cn n K | C n. u, '
5 Project Number
6.258138
r" -——— CORE COLLECfiON INFO
8 Dale/Time Collected Date/Time Processed
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
EPA R/V Mudpuppy
6 latitud^'Northing/Grid
V-1" SI (?• A,'
9 Sad Surface Elevation ^ ' J ( *~j fi
10 Coordinate System H NAD83 V NAVD88
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
.?T-J
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
Joe Bonom
7 "Lorigitye/Easting/Gfid
12 Weather (Temp, circle jcondUiogs, wind direction)
4
d
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosomc: -ft barrel -in dia
Core: 10 -ft barrel 4 -in dia
meter y
meter Manual Pusfc/ffibrac^^gHic^
-ft Box/PonarA/an Veen/Other
13 Boring Depth (ft)
14 Recovery (ft)
4.. L
15 % Recovery
?,) 7~7
^ ^ « k J,
Grab
Other:
Samp!
sample: -ft x -ft x
s Collection Method:
16 Location Notes
interval
(Depth)
Recovery
Description of Materials Sample ID , PID
Munsail Color; Moislure; Density; Consistency (Other Remarks) Sample Interval ' (ppm)
uses
e
o-\
r
CXtW-v Cvrc; »s€\ W, \U -k- Oc ¦.vrv? Sendfljr ;* 0 {
'*> l" / * "J 'V ! s " '-f\ u(t
wS><\Lt4, 2jn X £L 5/1 Crrf-K s
Get/
CH
I _ ^
•' foc.7.
c_- «b\d~ _
_ 2,. sHp- 5/1 C^x i -3- °'s
UT ioct
t r " ' '
1 1 I J... ^ .
W SO^11-'
i/. r V
0..5
CH
1
-------
UTHQLOQIC LOG
Sediment Collmtion Log
EA Engines ring, Science, <5 Technology, Inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
GLAES
Harbortown - Upstream
Location/Boring Name
HT18- j £
Sheet
1 of 1
1 Geologist Name/Signature
tfnsi^ (lu.xc
trt
5 Project Number
6256136
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected
J?fC
Date/Time Processed
2 Driving Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
EPA R/V Mudpuppy
6 'Lat^tud^Worthing/Grid
.~Ui iv[
9 Sod Surface Elevation
rx-c. 5'
10 Coordinate System
H MAD83 V NAVD88
3 Operator Name (License if II Required)
Joe Bonem
7 Longitude/Easting/Grid
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/and)
15
y> ¦-? L-
C>
Vr 5<- ?i5l
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunr^jtetoudy/Ram » '
u ^ ** t—*
¦>'PK
\
Sampling equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: 10 -ft barrel *
in diameter Manual Ppsh/Vibracore)
Grab Sample;
Other:
-ft x
-ft X
reljigfijc^
13 Boring Depth (ft)
A ^
14 Recovery (ft)
15 % Recovery
-ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
18 location Notes
Sample Collection Method:
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Mmsell Color; Moisture; Density, Consistency (Otter Rematte)
Recovery
(ft & %)
Sample ID PID
Sample Interval (ppm)
uses
Code
e ¦¦
i C.! ,- rf
\ ! Iue/C
fljuu \*,Ki "V
X *¦&€-
•% c. "V~c p uuA
3 t Av.<_
c c' • v\ o '¦ v, t ,i»
Q "
-¦i- L.
> i • j, "i"
9 Z
W. fUArr> C h' i" ( i a Hy.s i CO' f»iMic
, _ Wtrrr
V.J CH f." Clvt ^vV. n a ,i 4 „\V"\v\ >
J 01
hl/
OLL
^ I
.s
o.f i(y.'X
r^K, n/1 Crr^-j (/: ¦
ct-
? ft.
^ 1 L
A f.i
, VV\ C »Ww v'vWl
- t ¦ i,»%' y
v .V t L'WC
•\ '.W. *\ c > lC i| <*i < > in ^
C c-'tvv fvc^ cL, „„ ,i ^ j- 'd H 5 0 ;\:i
f>.-r-VLt TruCc '-"i i
Zq ^ Tip
lc^'i/'n,.Ldv:'S(;
iC
'3. C, -
! -P' i^c'Z
\Cvd ryi; } P, ^ .
i, r i" iv^ v-\ £• •' n 1;cv.f. IC ^ '
-/x' I
. 0.-6
CH
-------
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Soctiment Collection Log,
EA Engine&ring, Science, & Technology, Inc., PBC
C'ient Name and Project Name
GLAES
Harbortown - Upstream
Location/Boring Name
HT18- J c)
1 of
1 Geologist Name/Signature
tjyi»I %J C. I i V
t
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected
Dale/Time Processed/
9 Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
H MAO 83 V NAVD8B
1 i Depth of Water, ft (startfend)
/)u 1
2 Drilling SubcontractorfEcjuipmenf Operator
EPA Kftf Mudpuppy
3 Operator Name ("License # If Required)
Joe Bonem
6 Latitude/Northing/Grid
-,5- :7 'J
7 Longitude/Easting/Grid
6ZC 5 «, c/S2,X2b V
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
ij -i c 'Suro^Cioudy/Rain —
/,_/ ' ",vt .1 \r/' -C
X
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check. One)
Rotosonie: _____ -ft barrel -in diameter
10
Core:
Grab Sample.
Other:
-ft barrel
-ft x
-in diameter Manual PushiVibfacore|
-ft x -ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
13 Boring Depth (ft)
^ ¦ ' C-ff
14 Recovery (ft)
~r r.
! 5 % Recovery
16 Location Notes
Sample Collection Method
Recovery
interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Munsell Cofor Moisture; Density; Consistency (Other Remarks)
Sample ID
Sample Interval
PID
(ppm}
uses
Code
I lO<
fW' * '/v> w, *V\ V- .
£c c. *v *'\f ^ 1^- V/ t/> U; i a < k*\a L
fl*V. -^0 s m .'iCi va,Hi i ft . V
C-'\,r\(5 -V-vc. C< 5 \ \ V 4 bU''i.
i H I i Pv »j^- vr^-t >
i oft)
Ci
K U
0,5 l oo7a
2QSO
IS-If:"
ta
c. s-
-------
UTHOLGGtC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
£A Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc., P8C
Client Namo and Project Name
GLAES
Hartxwtown - Upstream
Location/Boring Name
HT1B- 10
Shoot
1 of 1
1 Geologist Name/Signature
C" f / '¦ r'i
i
/(
ZL
A" O- ?
5 Project Number
6256136
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected
h i'2l- It'in i s
Date/Time Processed
*7 x.
1, O C'C
L
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
EPA R/V Mudpuppy
Ja^deifjorttiirtg/Gnd
9 Sed Surface elevation ^ *-j (j £
A 7'
/
;v? v
f c
N
10 Coordinate System
H NAD83 V NAVD88
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
Joe Bonem
7 ( Lorig&i<^Easting/Grid
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
Z-5,ci
V
•Weather .(Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
4;
no
^uroiyfcloudy/ Rai n
JVj vy A.
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: w -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push,ty<6
Grab Sample: -ft x -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft)
1?5^'V
' ¦' j—~k 1
14 Recovers' (ft) j 15 % Recovery
S C> H
32
-ft Box/PonarA/an Veen/Other
18 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
(®&%)
Description of Materials
Munsoll Color; Moisture; Density, Consistency (Other Remarite)
Sample ID P1D
Sample Interval (ppm)
uses
Code
0 f: j
\\m
r
\ V fMk A I ^xv\c\
V'-c tvcL v> n
I'. Yl< 2/\ EVffc:.-
c--cac
C'i — 0,'
Sm
at-
V lotf
f/s
Jn ^ C L* v'\j K i *a t'- [>' fi ¦i h
(L'Cr b/» 0
C-r'Tt-v- x
l-L,' A,t-*
o.£ - !-£¦
O.H
C
M
^ t V\ a -f" i rvi
|'V<_
.oht-V v.->
X y'w V«'^'
"J. 0
Jt'
t.%
ft-, CU".U" , V'^'cCi ,+ C>-
*('jcvM£ lJt ^ t
er:r. w C'
{}, ^
' \J b -
-------
jggll LITHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering. Science, & Technology, Inc., P8C
Client Name and Project Name
6LAES
Harbortown - Upstream
Location/Boring Name Sheet
HT18- J2 I 1 of f
1 Geologist Name/Signature x'
hptu I ^ C,( i ^ c fj "
5 Project Number
6256136
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected Date/Time Processed
2S6 f (F/IS4T
2 Drilling SubcorrtraclorfEquipmont Operator
EPA HN Mud puppy
6 LatrtijW^irltiing/Grid
-0'i>o3ioYJ
9 Sed Surface Elevation ^ | ^ ft
10 Coordinate System H NAD83 V NAVD8B
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
I \ O-^K
3 Operator Name (license # If Required)
Joe Bonem
? ("iJorigKupSSEaslirig/Grid
i'd'i 2*
12 Weather (Temp, circ!e_conditions, wind direction)
•~/u " - Sun^loudySaln ^ $v,^
4
Samplin
Rotosc
Core:
Grab S
Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
nic: -ft barrel -in dia
meter
meter Manual PushA|t6rae5f&^^^^
__ -ft Box/Ponar,'Van Veen/Other
13 Boring Depth (ft) j 14 Recovery (ft)
'2^
15 % Recovery
—»*"v
#7*
<
10 -ft barrel 4 -in dia
ample:
-ft X -ft X
i Location Notes
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
(fl & %)
Description of Materials Sample ID ' PiD
Munseli Colon Moisture: Density; Consistency (Other Remarks) Sample Interval | (ppm)
uses
Code
0-
1-T
!•?' \v>%
i Hvj \-tkj3 -Vs S u.vs J u>'id
c v- notes'.
t-Ku\fW;vk vm -< Luc, Bui
CO I ^
o-i,v ai
^ n
_j ^ 7
1
-------
LITHOiOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc.. PRC
Client Name and Project Name
CrLft fT-S
Location/Boring Name
HTIS-2-5
Sheet
I of (
1 Geologist Name/Signature
i Ci>
y
-£tr<
Project Number
bJ5€>l<3t>
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected
^lOeffey
Date/Time Processed
ZW}£. /
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 Lqjitud^orthing/Gnd
if tl. ou cn V
9 Set! Surface Elevation *3 4^ lf
10 Coordinate System
H i\i^P b 5 v s^'AvJti!
3 Operator Name (license # If Required)
Joe Bonem
7 longitu^jfcaslirigi'GficI
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
i r*
12 Weather (Temp, circle cortdiliorts, wind direction)
5 ; <-? stfm^53y/Ram
is! 3
Sampfing Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: IC -ft barrel H -in diameter Manual Push/^iQracore/aoriic
Grab Sample: -ft x -ft x -ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft) 14 Recovery (fi) 15 % Rerovcty
I'L.
ir*
0 7
18 Location Notes
interval
(Depth)
Recovery
Description of Materials
Munsell Color: Moisture; Density; Consistenr-y [Other Remwiis!
Sample ID PID
Sample Interval . (ppm)
uses
Code
0-l
IXI
i fvfe S»" Avvlcj ^ i W Va- i-Hv \J££yt.hxk *"Tfcr\ iw
^ha a,wl Cty^i
¦L-CilO
Li -I
o.,c
CH
i
S , \\x,j u,f\^ 5c ocik lO 3o
o-{\X ^ { 0 Y i-_ 4^! ^
-—
tLQfrt'
ft <7
V .< i_
C-M
"1 — i
6 " b
z' ilci;
CX-6*"^4Svj S- rx& tv VV- -V-rtvCi^.
"=?» IV ov^A S j \ CXc^ \ v\\t;rYXids
-L_£Lli~—t£Z-!— i
3C
5 ~S'
2^
s c/
C L.
S-7
2s \uo%
St' f-O
5 '* -?
lA'j M
¦St/
C.L
"Mtf
i t r->i
a/
CLam \ i\'k1i,
.J \
^¦o so
r^r-tc*- !-*LL 0 ^
fW. Ki'i/'f*. i
sc /
C L
-------
LITHOLOGIG LOG
Sadiment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Hru\£s
Kg- to?• *r vt^~ >' -t
Location/Boring Name
f-n p ^
Sheet
J of I
1 Geologist Name/Signature
Pyn i U; iVvx_
A##e
5 Project Number
&2 5b I 5X
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected
ZSoi-M w/ i u o : ^ Ot r j &/11 h n
Date/Time Processed
2 DiHling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
0 c \oC£
x\ 0
(Vj
\ori 'v,'c.
8 ,Lsf!i!IiaB^Morthing/Gricl
4 j/'jLl • O l- -j 3*1-
9 Sed Surface
Elevation "7
10 Coordinate System
3 Operator Name (License 1} If Required)
Joe Bonem
7 ^Longitojle/Easting/Grid
azc si ^zom
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
12 We^fh^r (I emp, circle conditions, wind direction}
^ Sunny/Cioupy/Rain
t>
fx
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check. One)
Roiosonic: -ft barrel _ -in diameter
Core: I p -ft barrel *-( -in diameter Manual Push/Vibracorc/'Sc^ic
Grab Sample: -ft x _____ -ft x
Other:
13 Bonng Depth (ft) J 14 Recovery (ft)
Ct * I V? s~i i
7, f-,
15 % Recovery
01' ~f /o
-ft Box/PonarA/an Veen/Other
18 Location Moles
Sample Collection Method:
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
ffiS %)
Description of Materials j Sample ID , PID
Munsell Color, Moisture; Density; Cons'sloney (Other Remarks) 1 Sample Interval fppm)
uses
Code
(Fl'
I1 |co[?
^ilW H Pal, Sc.n d y'^ii H' >(\L Oe^
A » f; i.
! 0 "*!<— 1/ » vC- v-T^'W fj - i
SH
i -Z.T
\,f
'¦r-1 W Sc a & V..-,\Vi % C "-C \V* - n.L'
_ 1 . f <-¦ r*. ;>
vj>VV ^ \'V 0'.^
f c- r fei *; i Vail cwm »^
% m/
riu
I 1-
S!
2/S! i<*7*
^ -x 1
J V-f It"' ^ " C <>
t a f ,.Wvi •* '¦ ^
Cu
- c
1^' \ooi
A "i „ ^ \ i r f ji *3 C* 5 i
0*" V\ 0 -\»[ T"' r-C. "W St > ^ 2
'iv.»C S' " Sc'-t ' ' 0
?c
t- > I?
%%
\,Z
CWh V-r^c^ Suh4 ^^
J rv^ (U m \x Viic^k ijjU'-S-ViC» h-is'T t ^ \
>!juL "l i L>i,' L Cm- vi , IVcuv,^
CI
-------
LiTHOLOGlC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Gruftes
Location/Boring Name
T (r T ^
Sheet
1 of j
1 Geologist Name/Signature
Cj,
Wilis—
Project Number
t?tI 3 I
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected
X'xV"--
Date/Time Processed
>hfc-t?uL * tt>k'
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
C v' a ljoj <*~\ !H {/. f < M-/
6 Catifciffe/Northing/Grid
^2*2 i. c2 •)(.> 7 3 ',v!
9 Sect Surface Elevation *5 Q, „
3 Operator Warns (License # If Required}
Joe Bonefn
7 f.ongi|uile/basting/Grid
fr'Z^ s--/, £*¦ i'41 'vv!
10 Coordinate System H ^ ty),%v^
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
& i. S r 4-
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
SunnyfGifflJd^'Rairi hj
J™ "> O £ZT
L'»YK
>C
Sampling Equipment and Methodology {Check One)
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: ! C* -ft barrel l't -in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore/Sonic
Grab Sample: -ft x -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft)
lo '
14 Recovery (ft)
ch S'
15 % Recovery
-ft Box/PonarA/an Veen/Other
16 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
(»S,%)
Description of Materials
Munacll Coler: Moisture: Density; Consistency (Other Remarks)
Samole ID 1 PID
Sample Interval fpprrtj
uses
Code
0"\
cr/'o
"s,AV r\ ^ c\ yr J®-" 4'lH
.1 A AS I . l ^ i . I" . ** i ' . "1
lit. u < s* ^ Cl "Ll. " C
i - i i,
IQtf- 1 /> IW.
i.
DCHL-
£>•¦ 1'
Mi—~
2 t O b
r^V CX
£> Y) 4 +~ 3 \vj r ivi ".1
if.VR 2/1
i 0 3C*
rtu
VHX
M' -
Wtt*
<\\J. Ct i
, bo --C-
*3 C' ^ ^
2/3
H U
vz-
:,v'
\c-i <"* O ^ 1I'V
C lA-a iv\ h . C lV> an 4 - c r'c\c\ w">
1-^ f ^ ^ ^ ta
h - L - T'
l-i i
St-\
CL1
"7~~
iiJ
X/utl
8*7*
/ Cutrfo
S-u
-S cOc1^"^--
•?C'W
7-ci ^
34
Sf-\
-------
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
BA Engineering. Science, & Technology, Inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
GLAES
Harbertown - Upstream
Location/Baring Name
HT18- JiC
Sheet
1 of f
1 Geologist Name/Signature
S Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
ivj C
— i2_i£
8 Date/Time Collected
Date/Time Processed
i^o.'+n- / | ^ o
9 Sed Surface Elevation
'? I; #
10 Coordinate System
H NAD 83 V NAVD88
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
i
2 Drilling Subcontfactor/Equipmpnt Operator
EPA RtV Mudpuppy
6 t,a WiKtei^tof thin g-'Cir id
2 - ^ V It l'VH
; * • !
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
Joe Booem
Longitude/Easting/Grid
- 3: ^ 77 ^^lf *»'
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
- (S"uri3y/Cloudy/Rain
t- •"
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: _ -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: 10 -ft barrel 4
Grab Sample: ___ -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
-in diameter Manual Push/yibraoor;
-ft x -ft Box/Portar/Van Veen/Other
13 Boring Depth (ft) j 14 Recovery (ft)
--"C- Vl» i» ^ J. Wf'Vl £ CI ci -4-^t "j
i .Nil \c |VV(\ -S\-'iVvi T7 iXjCk. -V! vlA^
J2A_iKaMLtl^ K.: t O. M/i XW (C
1
Sm/
Si
3-5
Z1 •tc.t
< i H,j f\_2^_ Vc iV«4_s^ \\yyV.A"l ;-SL\n -'?'
St \j
C, i—
1-id
f
'1 tr ' 0 I .
L 5 c'-,1' <¦
[V> c-vy^
T't'A,
hi c ^t C1
'7^
hsH ^
.j
tf
-------
jglll UfHOLOG!
Sediment Collection Log
(-.A bngineeting. Science, & Technology, Inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
GLAES
Harbortown - Upstream
loeaton/Barrng Name
HT18- Z7
Sheet
1 of 1
1 Geologist Name/Signature
— - . /I K-
fc/Yi ^ L-ifsA.
5 Project Number
8258136
: COLLECTION INFO
8 Dale/Time Collected Date/Time Processed
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
EPA R/V Mudpuppy
6 CatituS^/Northiiig/Grid
- / - f
9 Sed Surface Elevation f-T £ ^ ^ ^ ft
10 Coordinate System H NAD83 V NAVDE8
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
IS
3 Operator Name (License if if Required)
Joe Bonem
7 L:^ngiti^/Easting;Grid
S: 7.7C> ' i-
12 Weather (Temp, circle condfoons, wind direction)
' y-~ ^SuriTy/Cloudy/Rain
4
C
Samphn
Rotosc
Core:
Grab £
g Equipment ant) Methodology (Check One)
>nic* -ft barrel -in dia
10 -ft barrel 4 -in dia
meter
meter Manual Push/yibracof'^o^t6^)^
-ft Box/Ponarft/an Veen/Other
13 Boring Depth (ft) j 14 Recovery (fl)
\
S I1 _ . *w '
15 % Recovery
^ r--|
b r/i
ample:
-ft X -ft X
18 Location Notes
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
{ft & %)
Description of Materials Sample ID PID
Munsell Colon Moisture; Density, Consistency (Other Remarks] Sample Interval fppm}
uses
Code
c-e
0^*' tOC%
. l| VU V V-<- i \ n iw cV' ~ •**" Si" i\ 3 . I U
j 0 ^ (
i-\ M 4 ^c-"\h \ iicior, -«h-v >¦- S sv c Li [^ 0 - g
Grftf
ShA
•6-Z.H
\ ?! \ ts'r
_.j xV". ^cV1 ~ SoZ-O
y^M-sLOJ o aCj-vUv j DU) if^^J » J^t;C t- ^ j I » t-
jkini- ond CkCc J K )f*~ 1
CAf
Cj "iA ^ iwS p H,"c,v ,%
|
\
-------
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Or\-.f\E^
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
| 0f ]
1 Geologist Name/Signature
Ewi i\j Ci>
Project Number
C,25 CIS
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected
.22 Oc*«/H8S
Date/Time Processed
23 Oct It jczo O
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
vcvelicm r\ ai A_e
6 L^fituap/Northing/Grid
Li/''.2£J 11-C^ZH' f\j
9 Sod Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
H M
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
Joe Bonem
7 CS^jWQpe/Eapting/Grid
BS'sy btoicc'tj
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
9 •? U
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
*5 0
-------
LITHOLOG1C LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Trt f\ I ^ , ,
Location/Boring Name
HT i ?.¦ -3^'
Sheet
I of I
1 Geologist Name/Signature
p"i J^( Ci'
5 Project Number
(jZ"561 5^7
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 DatefTIme Collected
%% (J C "h?0i ^'yl'955'
Date/Tim« Processed
23Cartels
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
a Clan Ha f\ <\Ji
6 (iSS^/Northing/Grid
9 Sect Surface Elevation °ib -fj- ff
10 Coordinate System H ^ft\>65 V ^
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
Joe Bonem
? C^igjtjA/Easting/Grid
cU05'.r L^H0id' W
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
*. 'Sum^f/Ctoudy/Rain
r~
>6
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: IQ -ft barrel t—j -in diameter Manual PushMbrac^e/Sonic
Grab Sample: -ft x -ft x -ft Box/Portar/Vart Veen/Other
Other;
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft)
14 Recovery (ft)
15 % Recovery
92%
16 Location Notes
interval
(Depth)
Recovery
(ft & %)
Description of Materials
Munsell Co'or; Moisture; Density; Consistency jplher Remarks)
Sample ID
Sample Interval
PID
(ppm)
¦user
Code
£> fer
n 9 l.
1%
(3jM*^\S\\\- V-JuvVVv U^V-" r\^ ynj 1
y J 0 \ - 1
_ l
1 -10
b ¦ "4
H .7
-------
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Sedirmnt Cot/action Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc., PBC
Client Name aid Project Name
6LAES
Hirbortown - Upstream
Location/Boring Name
HT18- 3j
Sheet
1 of f
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
&Y!itvi C
I (fXJL.
S Date/Time Collected
3&W- i#7|IZ5
Date/Time Processed
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
EPA R/V Mudpupfiy
6 ^Tablj^/Narthfng/Grid
9 Bed Surface Eieratiori
W.'r
10 Coordinate System
H NAD83 V NAVD88
3 Operator Name (License # if Required)
Joe Bonem
7 ion9itud|)Easting/Grid
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
j) "7
l'-V 7
o. 1 C
5', f477/&
'V
12 Weather (Temp, circle cortiiitoTis, wind dtraction)
c-.-" %jnrt|ffa0tkiy/Rain i 11 (
K. t~
!V> i"*1 I >-
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Chock One)
Rotosonic; -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push/1
-ft x -ft x -ft Box/Ponar/¥an Veen/Other
13 Boring Depth (R)
14 Recovery (ft)
f p
b
'•'t-
is % Recovery
n —i "
t .
Grab Sample:
Other:
16 Location Notes
Sample Collection Method:
Recovery
(ft & %)
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Mureptl Cotoi, Moisture; Density. Consistency {Other Remarks!
Sample ID
Sample Interval
PID
(ppmj
uses
Coda
C •s
?
-\xj- 1 lOj \ i; (IV\3 ^ ,c
C \ S , ft ^ A irV-y-W-" ^ VW'vt k>
0-1
IM;
Lc \ ~ \ '
5 t ?/1 -
5 \od?Q
vvt^cV c^~\c\ s s W
tf- CJL^ w
\\
;*v
k ' I ^
w *\ #r **»
u> t
, ur> /-b
O L-
7. is -
%;}
7) u \[
iVu do.^ (litA4 i-n,rn 2 <2
V-r> <* f"6 C-^VL.^
0'-/
I'-'' Blt S/,v 0^..,%, C*rv,.
z .lo ~ *3,
r^- *.v.
""1
l-.l' I d v
tvt- r> f—¦'!.
f . V
-c to CM ; li'l) k 5/1
L——
¦"3, 7- - t b'
ea
CrC
-------
HH UTHQLOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA engineering. Science, & Technology, Inc.. PBG
Client Name and Project Name
GLAES
Harbortown - Upstream
Localion/Boring Name
HT18- i C~
Sbeei
1 of 1
1 Geologist Name/Signature
Cw tfUXre;--
5 Project Number
8258138
CORE COLLECTION INFO
6 Dateffime Collected D«te/Timo Processed
ZSodtOo&jiCK 2Hattt/\PxC>
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
EPA R/V Mudpuppy
6 LSSu^/Northing/Srid
4i' ;o '.v.
3 Sod Surface Elevation *, * v ^>5" ft
10 Coordinate System H NAD83 V NAV088
11 Depth of Water, ft {start/end)
q
3 Operator Name (license # If Required)
joe Bonem
7 tSng^le/Easting/Giid
7 i" (' s rSf f 1 *> ' ^
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
7$unSpC ioudyWa m
4
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosomc: -ft barrel -in dia
Gore: -ft barrel ^ -in dia
meter
meter Manual Push/Slpracqri^^^^
-ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
13 Boring Deptn (ft)
*?. C"
14 Recovery (ft)
/ L"
15 % Recovery
loc:fZ
Grab £
Other:
SampI
sample: -ft x -ft x
a Collection Method:
16 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
(ft & %)
Description of Materials i Sample ID PID
Munseli Color; Moisture; Density; Consistency (Other Remarks) , Sample Interval (ppmj
uses
8
CH
i !iX:/r
"Wo-cX. f'.'u^iAC\f ^ ^ ( '<>1
2.. Vfe- H/s 'Dn^ lWm . D"'!
i - 5
2' }vij_ ;\,n-c >„
ft A <1 •Vtt. C.. ."~C C ^ i
2,5 1^ 511 ^>j '
HI
3 - 3
% '-o*
Si \V>-^ C A-r£v C-_ C\n(i ,7c
^ 1 c f ! 'H
t ' 3'"°
CL
2' k<%
5" c 7t.'
S>t., 'ivL u.5 C'. v'£: vti , ' f if
s i ¦ H
CL
-------
LITHOLOGiC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering Science & Technology, Inc, PBC
Chen Name and Project Name
-iarbortown - Up
v-GcatiGrh'Bcpng Name
UT^fi /"? \
Sheet
1 of
1 Geologist Name'Signature
Ma fit
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
Start Date/Time
V* 1 -1 1 . ^ '7
Stop Date/Time
kstfts~rij is
Oni, ng Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
a / Utitude'Northmg^Gnd
Seti Surface Elevation
>b
10 Coordrnate Systerr,
H
3 Operator Name [License # If Required)
7 'Longrtude/'Easting.'Gnd
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
7 I
12 Weather (Temp, crdjreartditions, iwnd direct-on i
Sunny/Cloudy/Rain ^ ,
Sarnp'ing Equipmert and M&thcdology iCneek One!
Rotosonici -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: _ -ft barrel
Grab Sample; ¦» -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Bomg Depth ffi)
tn diameter Manual Push/Vibraccre
ft x t' ' -ft Box'Ponar/Van Veen/Other
14 'Recovery (ft I
15 '<¦ Recovery
6 Location Noses
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Va.3r geaiiTsni ypp cat :r presence c' SA'/Juxit/aeod odor'sisen other "Elusions
Sample ID
1 ?'
I I f"
«... 01 M V
uses
Code
Other:
-------
LITHOLOG1C LOG
Sediment Cdlsaion Log
£A Engineering Science, £ Technology. Inc.. PBC
C eit Name and Pro;ect Name
H "j-ii- ,, - r ?ri
Locat on/Boring Name
Sheet
I of
1
Geologist NamefSrgrtat-jre
5 Project Number
GORE COLLECTION INFO
!,* . -P
| ^vV | fv'i. \ / i \
8286136
8 Start DateJTim©
i-v:. 1>..C S
Stop DatefiTime
¦l unf',
ad
2
Drilling 5ubcontractor'Equicment Operator
6 \ Lalitude/Northng.'G^d
9 Sed Surface Elevation
T fi~
n
. ' ; ^ !-t
10 Coordinate System
H
J
V
• ,.,M i
" 1,1 f " ' " ' 1
11 Depth of Water ft istart/endj
3
Operator Name (License # ff Required)
7 'Longitude,'Eastirg'Gnd
ii' (
O^e- Qenwrs
^ 2 q , / / ^ j 3 3
12 Weathe-jTenp, arc jscondrt tons, wind d.rectiont
„ __i* 1 SunnyCloudy/Rain j,1
4
Sam oil ng Equipment ard Methodology (Check Onej
13 Bonnq Depth ifll ] 14 Recovery it,
15 Recovery
Rotosonic' -ft barrel -in diameter
' "{
Core -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
I ' '"i
'I
\
Grab Sample -j
-ft x -ft x
» - -ft Box'Ponar/7an Veen/Other
15 Locat,on Nates
Other
Sample Collection Method,
< •? j- '
Zr S^~ 0 t R*
W&''jL cf
~ I
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Man'jwjrW.wpe co'ar, presencecr 5AV'rcr*'«v: odor^.hetri rthc *:i
5 01S
Sample 10
uses
CoCe
1 '•
.. ;¦ f r !
, ,« aa A-- i *
>—J ^5
¦!/
\ 14— )<*}
-
Other;
M r€-fiACn„,\
¦ I
-------
B*
L1TH0L0G1C LOG
Sediment Gotteeimrt Log
BA Bngmeenng Science, & Technology, inc, PBC
Clieni Name aid Project Na-ne
GLUES
Harbortown - Upstream
Location/Boring Narre
MT1R- nl
Sheet
of '
1 Geologist Name/Signature
6 Rro.ert Numcer
CORE COLLECTION INFO
Start Date/Time
r" if'1'-1
Stop Date/Time
y
2 Dnlkng Subcortractor/Equipment Operator
Latitude/No'thng/Grid
9 Sed Surface Elevation
I
M
I \ •' >
b N
3 Operator Name {License it if Requiredi
I fti-p. f) n
I LongitudefEasting/Gnd
10 Coordinate System
H i-"u:r-
v ; ~
11 Depth of Wate- ft fs'.art'ertdj
f
12 Weatrier (Temp, circ'e.c.onditions wnd directioni
:
Sunny/Clcudy/Ram
t >'•' ' .1'
13 Bonng Desth iftl
14 Recovery ittj
15 % Recovery
•; ¦ ~
t
, ?
t
Sampiing Equ>pmert and MstncxJology (Cneck Onei
Rotosontc -ft barret -in diameter
Core; ___ barrel _
Grab Sample, ' -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method.
-in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
-ft x ':.l -ft Box'Ponar//an Veen/Other
16 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth!
Description of Materials
MacrSedirrstOpe color, presence o* SAVfrc;*,woes octar'sheen other ore
Sample ID
uses
Code
Other:
ji£. Jtr* 5A -T<*'• • n i) ^ -< 9r t> f<^ ,
tv/Mrrf" c&tC. it
-------
m
EA Engineering, Saence
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Sertmsnf Collection Log
& Technology, Inc . PBC
Client Name and Project Name
h ,'rI.-, • ' t, - IF. ¦=! ;,-,r
Location/Boring Name
K-, f
Sheet
' Of it
1
Geo.ogist Kane/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
/
in/ifl 0, rr» 1-
ft (i t I i
^ " . L
B Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
1,
ffl
,'V »
¦ 4 I.. ¦ [
<5 /
1:: if,'
2
Drilling Subcontractor/Eauiprnent Operator
6 i LalitudefNorthtng/Giid
9 Sed Surface Elevation ,
0
/ ... i h /
i* ' 1 ! •
' I ^ 1— , . 1
!0 Coordinate System
V
„
* •' * /W /* jp A g\ |
11 Deplhof Water, ft istart'enai
3
Operator Name i. License * tf Requirad)
7 i "Long^tude/Eastirg.'Grid
¦ -C,'
' 7 t
j
/ /J .
52 Weather iTemp, circle conditions, wind direction!
; l ' Sur,ny/Clcu 11
jj 5 5 " I'lirg. ^tK<'yk r?i-u-C,K\ i
r0 H/> n-
' ha 0. 3 fi (
fewfr
-------
L1TH0L0G1C LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc, PBC
Client Name and Project Name
GLAES
Harbortown - Upstream
LocatiomBonng Name
Sheet
of
1 Geologist Namei'Signature
1
5 Project Number
8250136
CORE COLLECTION INFO
3 Start Date/Time
n
Stop Date/Tim®
inaifMW,
i c
¦-'n
2 Dnlfmg Subcofltracto^'Eauipnent Operator
i M A t } f. ^
6 f uatitude'MorttiingiGrid
!' ' C
9 Sed Surface Elevation
3 Operator Kame (License # If Required!
porgilude'Eaitmg'Gna
1C Coordinate System H
! Or VI
11 Dsptn of Water, ft ist3rt>'end:
*
'2 Weather (Temp circle conations, wind direction
- '"SjunnyCloudy'Ratn ' ' t. " I,
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Chenk One)
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel
Grab Sample; 3 -ft x
Other:
Sample Coflection Method;
13 Boring Depth ifJ
-in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
-ft x I*." -ft BoK'Ponar/ /an Veen/Other
14 Recover'ft f
15 "n Recovery
16 Location Notes
Mo^K at
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Ma.srSedner' t.pe t,J> r, o* '•kV'rc^^tcci,cdoristieen. ether-xls arts
Sample ID
uses
Code
•i i >r * _ i f « v
,¦¦¦¦¦' * f >'¦
) £"A-
1 I h s 'f
" Jki. i. ir ,'
-ft 3 "» iKf
O.h.r:
sC* iMhjo>h,(rr.,
-------
G
m
EA Engineering Science,
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
&. Technology, inc , PBC
Client Name and Project Name
l-L,> ^
" .ii i;>. r kL'1' n - h\"ia> "i f
Location'Boring Name
i j, r < ,
Sheet
I of f
1
Geologist NarrefSignature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
. \ » V . '¦
—'f -¦"" if 1 Ik
8 Start OatelTime
T > . . 1 ' '"it '
fit)
Stop Date/Tim©
t t ,1" if/
f
, ? r>
2
Drilling Subcontractor'Equipment Operator
6 Latitbde'Ncrlhing/Grid
9 Sad Surface Elevation
60.3
n
1 ( e.A.' •
' '1 ' , ' f'l f 1
12 Coordinate System
H 11 Cr,
V
1 , ^r,;. ,
% ' ' \ - I
'u 1 1 - 1
11 Depth of Water ft istartf'endl
3
Operator Name (License # It Required!
7 / Longitudtei'Eas'iing/Grrd
1
, •¦¦¦ ; » » a v Hi
? - t , r
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions wind direct'or.) L \1
-//. ~ Sunnyfploudy/Rain _ . i
4
Sampling Equipment and Methodology tCnec< One!
Rotosonic -ft barrel -in diameter
13 Boring Depth tflt
# r a
14 Recovery (ftj
15
ri> Recovery
Core -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push/Vtbracore
ii l ;¦
1
*
'•
Grab Sarnp'e ' i
-ft X -ft X
r.C -ft Box'Ponar//ai Veen/Other
1P Location Notes
-7 <
_
Other:
Sample Collection Metbc
d:
lout h
iS t ¦ S
.! f 4 -*- -
{"/fij.
D'yl "1
\WX
.II
l.v
[C
^ r 1 ~ '
1 5 "
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
MsorSeaiTTiStvpe, :o3r p-eteice n> iA we d od'.r'shoiti cfrur i r.lis~Dn>
Sample ID
uses
Code
l' 1 f 1
( k'". i "
1 >
, ¦ . V
a 0t9**-L
">ft . ,r f) i-/ *^v •>-¦<,*
"
f- , f ¦
r
/ *
1
- ii3
Other:
-------
LfTHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
Client Name and Project N^me
Hi
Location Boring Name
jt n-
Sheet
of 1
1 Geologist Narne/S gnatire
5 °foject Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
3 Start Date/Time
rpp-F-
Stop Date/Time <
-1 >mOi^S
*h' « i
Drying Sufccont'actor/Equipirent Operator
6 Latitude/Northing/Gnd
9 Sed Surface Elevation
N
IC Coordinate System
H i11' \ r ¦
3 Operator Name {License # If Required!
7 L'ongitudS/East.rgiGnd
11 Depth of Water, ft (startfenoi
IO" (
12 Weatner rlemp. circle conations wind direction*
'-i - ' Su-nry C OjdV'Rair . •
SanplT.g Equipment arid Methodology (Cheat One)
Rotosonic -ft barrel -in diameter
C°re -ft barret
Grab Sample. >"¦ -fl x
Other:
Sample Collection Method.
13 Boring Depth (ft)
in diameter Manual PushA/ibracore
fix : ¦- -ft Box'Ponar/ Van Veen/Other
14 Recovery iff;
15 % Recovery
16 Location Notes
Interval
{Depth i
Description of Materials
y-|i r bed rrtrt t\3 rr jr"^"^ -I"-*. •ock/A'OOd C35rfsksen oihe- rr\'S!0"5
Sample ID
uses
Cods
.-j *pvtyft c. , ,
i ,1 \!, i
A
* Ml'4 V
i
Other:
-------
E
LITHClOCVC log
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Bonng Nane
She©;
Sediment CoHeaicn Log
GLAES
i ot /
EA Engineering. Science 5 Technology wc, PBC
"¦ "i Mi, , » J'\ , I
1
Geologist Name'Signature
-> Project Numbe*-
CORE COLLECTION INFO
-unn [ 1
8 Start Date/Tims
Stop Date/Time
f* i - * '
~ 1 iV"
'l ^ u 1 l-
**7 *i ''/7
\ T
1,1 «
- f.
/ M —
2
Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 Lat it u deMo rt hi ng; G n d
9 Sed Surface Elevation ,
i;r f
ft
/' ,n 1 !
» : ' - r; ; i '¦1
10 Coord nate System
H «1 trV
V
11 Depth of Water f: (mart/end)
3
Operator Name {License # ft Required)
7 LongitJctoEastipg'GiicI
*• r ""
/ /
- - *.. r;-n p . /. | /
12 Weather rTemp, circle conditions, wind direction
¦'* i ' ' >'v"
Su-iny'froudy/Rsin
4
Sarnpnrig Equipment and Methodology i,Check Ore)
13 Sorrg Depth (fti
14 Recovery (ft i
15
M. Recovery
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
«
Core -ft barrel -in diameter Manual PushA/ibracore
I t '
Grab Sample, > -ft x -ft x
i ~ -ft Box'Ponar/ /an Veen/Other
16 Location Noles
Other:
/ vi'-r,s .
i
} iA
,• -A ,
Sample Collection Method'
, . r
IqI
Interval
(Death)
Description of Materials
Sample ID
uses
Corfe
1 M - ,?
Other:
A-
u
-------
EA Engineering,
L'THO'.OG'C LOG
Sediment Collection Loo
Science 3 Tacftnotogy_jnc__PSC_
Client Name and 3i"0|ect Name
LocaiioriBonng Nana
Sheet
o*
1 Geotog.st Name'Signature
5 Proiect Number
8256136
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
r*F
3 Operator Na»ne fLicense * If Required
Dnl'.ng SubconiractoriEquiprrent Operator
6 UsUudeMorthingfGnd
9 Sed Surface Elevation >
1D Coordinate System
H
V I '
Long tjde>Easting,,Gnd
11 Oeoth ot Water, ft I stai/end i
' I . /
i /
12 Weather (Temp, circJe.Qonditions wind direct oni
- , - ! SunnyJCIoudy'Rain
4 Sampling Fquiament and Methodoloqv (Check One)
Rotosonic, -ft barrel -m diameter
Core -ft barrel -in diameter Manual PushA/ibracore
Grab Sample. ' ¦ -ft x -ft x ___ -f! Box'Ponar/ /an Veen/Other
Other:
13 Boring Depth'ft)
14 Recovery (til
15 r.f> Recovery
16 Location Notes
Sample Collection Method;
Interval
[Depth)
Description of Materials
a' SAV/reAvmed, odO'-.'shew orer inclusiors
Sample ID
uses
Code
| -r? f? '.
Other:
fed] 'f'frpM
A
. . -v !,« c^jr
-------
m
EA Engineering Science
UTBOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Cotlechon Log
& Technology, he. PBC
"lien'. Name and Pro;ect Name
iLlri. 1 f
LocalioriiBor ng tvarre
\o
Sfieei
of
1
Geologist Name'S-gnatJfe
5 ^rO]ect Number
COKE COLLECTION INFO
P%if)4A [J^ f A
J l ,
8 Start Date/Time
;,s
Stop Date/Time
U 1 ' / J In "J 0
2
Or,t|irg Subconlr?ctor^Equ pmenS Operator
6 'Latitudp/Ncrthingi'Grid
9 Seel Surface Elevation >
f 1
I ¦'
ft
H'l/ 1,1 it N
10 Coorcfrnate System
H 1
V
i1 Ll, * i.
1 iT*" (rJ >, tj~ if'
1i Depth of Water, ft istart/enc)
3
Operator Name < License # If Required)
7 llongitujje'EasSing/Grid
C (}
•*1? \ ** "7 I i*f) '* '''w
12 Weather (Temp crrcle conditions, wind direction i
' * $unny/Cloudy'Rain 3 p
4
Sampling Equpnen: and Metnodotogy (Check Oriel
*3 Boring Depth fft^
14 Recovery i?l)
15
Reccvcv
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
Y
i
L-S
(j /
Core: -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
1
. '
}¦-
X
Grab Sample; 0
-ft X -ft X
i -ft Bo\'Ponar? /an Veen/Other
16 Lccaticn Nictes
Other:
4
Sample Collection Method:
Interval
{D&pth)
Description of Materials
MallTS«iiTen*!>pe,^r,ptpwrrecfsav,-oc('V.;-i - rre-iv rfc -:i
^:r:
Sample ID
uses
Code
i 0 ¦ •
;J • "I */ ' ,,'t l" ¦*' ' 1 ¦ /
f f>hV
i~f l
kJ>
4~U^ CtrAlt* it frVAK-*
.. 1! , ..
¦ 0
Other:
1
-------
¦
m
EA Engmsenng, Science
LITHQLGGiC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
Sf 7actviokxjy Inc, PBC
Chert Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
1 1
Sheet
1 Of f
1
Geologist N'ama/S gnaure
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
t'r.' \ \ ,
J:'""
'¦ , •
B Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
2
Dr iing Subcontraclor'Equipment Operator
8 Latitude/Norttimg/Gnd
9 Sed Surface Elevation
i
ft
fM, ,•>» 4 j ,,a M
J , 1 1 *•<",' ' ¦ */!, u . "
10 Coord-nate Syjlem
H rriv,
V
r>v>
' cP (h ( f ->(/ 1 &
11 Depth of Water, ft istartfend!
3
Operator Narre ftscense # If Required}
7 Lcng!:ud©(|1East!ng''G'id
"hef
jj?_
, t ,l ' i ^ >
i..* f £? Y ^ /{10J Vl/
12 Weather iTernc e-rcie CQncf-tions, wind direction!
. " Sunnyfcioudy.'Ran , <. /
i
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
13 Boring Depth it j
14 Recovery tftj I 15
' u Recovery
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
,,; ,,
• J
Core; -ft barrel -in diameter Manual PushA/ibracore
—
Grab Sample. 0
Other:
-ft X -ft X
? -ft Box'Ponar/ /an Veen/Other
*«6 Locat on Kctes
• , „ ft ' s , • *
n
,f 'J
' ^ , 1»
,rJ f
Sample Collection Method:
i'.
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Msjc Sso TErrt type, rotor, presence o' SAVlw wc>;1 abt'st-eei, oner irc'usions
Sample ID
uses
Code
jl Jtlu^r- j-
i1
>
..
Other:
C$r'C^. t'C-x*''' > „ frd- sfm-u
fie l£ir fn^.s "f,
*yr*h$ /y_.
1.44 A 3-^
-------
KWi UTHQ_OGiC LOG
Sediment Collection Lag
EA Engineering, Science, £ Technology Inc, PBC
Chen! Name and Project Name
H rho'- "¦ •(* 'li M" .i:n
Location. Bonna K'ane
- r 1 " ,\
Sheet
i of
1
Geologist Name/Signature
5 Pro.eet Numbei
CORE COLLECTION INFO
P% \f\&jf\ r*A
8 Start Date/Time
' s . f
r1-' , 1 1 / '
? %
Stop Dateffime .
i 1 fr>" , A'? •
it"** *-> \ {
i
A.
Drilling Subcontractor!1 Equipment Operator
S I Latiiude'North'ngiGricl
9 Sed Surface Elevation £(> ff
ft
/ :!! .
Ui# 11 ^ i oAJ
10 Coordinate System
h 'i -i: •
V
'¦
J cK, r-1, J s i v i j iv
1! Depth of Water ft (sta1/end)
3
Oserato' \arne 'License # if Required)
7 [LangifudeiEastmgfGrid
<* fi /
: 's ' 1 •
12 Wea'her (Temp, circle-Conditions, wind direction?
i, v, 1 Sunny/Cloudy'Ram
A
Samoling Equ:?2 uslc ct SA<>'rx* Vvccs cdrr'5heer ctfe' "1
Sample ID
uses
Code
I 43 5
, > '1 ,S ; i - ' , 1
- in .
(
X - • -1 1 w
1 ' i '
[ 1 A
Other:
/
-------
E
ft
EA Engineering. Science
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
& Technology, Inc. PBC
Gi-ent Name and Project Name
Location'Boring Name
nri-; i'7
Sheel
of
t
Geotog st Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
¦i/';
r\ X ':\ "
.
8 Start DatefTfrne
i! ' V '
' / *7
Stop Date/Time
ri)c '
2
Drillsnc Subcontractcr/Equ pment Operator
6 ,Latitude/Northing/Gr ci
9 Sed Surface Elevation 1
it
/ i
i!'\ I- i
I v | /;!. /
¦. ,V^' A.'
10 Coordinate System
H
V
'1,-S
1
11 DeptK-pf Water, ft (start/end)
3
Oaerator Mane (license 9 if Required)
1.
7 Long-t j de/Ea sti ng 'G n d
" r";
* / # ft ^ r
12 Weather t Temp, cirde conditions, vy.nd direction)
ii 1 Sunny/Cloudy/Rain ; i *
4
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One;
13 Borng Dectb (ftj
14 Recovery (fi)
15 % Recovery
Rotosonic, -ft barrel -in diameter
1
Core; -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
<• t--
;s
Grab Sample, n
-ft X -ft X
1 * -ft Box'Ponar//an Veen/Other
16 Locator Notes
Other:
1 ! u t- j
i"fl i"
Sample Collection Method:
rsCiOSr
"t.f
c
i
F " 1
Interval
{Depth}
Description of Materials I
f/aor 8e :m rns,tvp"21,'Obr, pr85£jni.oodor'sh^en 1
Sample ID
uses
Cooe
v 1 * w
- 1 I |
wU 5*11 uOi-f'H I*CiRfix
^ Oft tr&f' *
¦>, i
i / 1
Other:
pq§~0 ^CffrCt
, <• ti.Houn:*r" Q If
t.,<
-------
¦TrfV UTHOIOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science. J Technology Inc PBC
Dsent Name and Project NaTie
J.!, >AEl-
l-U^c >o>.< i - I'mm-: , p
Location/Soring Name
-r r 4-~ -
Stv
' Of i
1
Geologist Name'Signatire
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
u
6^'M v
a Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
/* ¦ / . r "
r'•
,tf{>
:4 ''1 u
H^S/
•n- r>
a
Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 ^Latitude/Northing'Grid
9 Sea Surface Elevation (*
^ v| ^
n
/ y? *T~(K( f I
*" t ' , - , !
t » j ' 1 "
10 Coordinate System
H
V
11 t *
1* Depth of Water ft (start/end)
3
Operator Name rLicense # !* Reauired}
7 "Longitude/Easting/Grid
; ? 4
'\ y j§ & /}~"> jf/fy
v
¦ it"
12 Weather (Temp, circle condi.tiors w»r>d direction?
Surmy/Clcudy/Rairi , — " .
4
Samp'ing Equipment and Methodology (Checks One?
13 Boring Depth (ft)
14 Recovery (ft)
15 % Recovery
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
i
Core: -ft barrel -m diameter Manual Pusb/Vibracore
-
;;
Grab Sample1 <'•
-ft X -ft X
'>.3 -ft Box'Ponar/ /an Veen/Other
Other:
Sample Collection Method'
Interval
(Depihl
Description of Materials 1
MajCrSedimsr' type oicr, prince of SAV'rK'.,.vc:c cdcr'sheen cthe'i-ctus'ois !
Sample ID
uses
Code
v. ¦
/ f j\ w W -liV
> ^ J.xt -J
AA
-------
m
LITHGLOGJC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc , PBC
Client Name and Preyed Name
Location'Boring Name
HT1S- ) S
Sheet
1 Geoiogist Mame/Srgnature
b
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
3 Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
Drilling SunconSracior/Equipment Operator
6 •->_at!tudt/Wortli>rgfGnd
8 Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
H H
11 Deptfi of Water, ft (starUendl
3 Operator Name (License # If Required!
tcngiiucle/Eastmg/Gnd
a l.
12 Weather iTemp circle ccrditions, wind direction;
' - Sunrtyi'ClouoyRain 11 • <
Sampling Equipment and Methodology iChect One)
Rcrtosonic, -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel
Grab Sample' r -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method
13 String Deptli (ts
in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
ft x L' -ft Box'Ponar' /an Veen/Other
14 Recovery (ft)
15 -.n Recovery
i f? <"
; 6 Local on Notes
> VI
J
1 ' ; ' I • L
Interval
{Depth}
Description of Materials
Ma,srSeaiirsn".type coior p-esenceo'^AVirurtwxc odcr'yiecn other.rrk,sons
Sample ID
uses
Code
Other:
ColleHr cart-, -
«| {r£-C0 V~t »*| 6 ' ""'
-------
LITHOLOGfC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engipeenng, Science, & Technology tnc, FBC
Client Name and Project Name
locatiorvBnnng Name
v -16
Sheet
of
t Geologist Name/Signsture
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
Jr.
8 Start Dale/Time
H /I5>5
Stop Datfi/Timft
/ > £ h*
2 Drilling Subcontractor^Equ pmem Operator
L
6 Lattude/Normmcj/GnG
\
3 Sec Surface Elevation
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
IT.. i? H :/'t „ f «i"\
7 .'longitude/Easting/Grid
-V~jkc *C"
CJ " j> •
10 Coo'cnate System H
LJ-
V
tli n^,
1; Depth of Wate'ft (Staft'endi -
.-r" <*,
''
t , •
/ *
'
\
f 1. '
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind directions
' SunnyiCloudy/Ram ; ' .
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Ctieck One)
Rotosonic -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel
Grab Sample' -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method'
13 Bering Depth (ft i
-in diameter Manual PushA/ibraoore
-ftx 5,3 -ft Box'Ponar/ /an Veen/Other
14 Recovery (ft)
15 if, Recovery
Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
MaorSedimen: type rrfcr, presence of SAV"oolc'wofld, ¦ado-^hee", o'.w inclusion
Sample ID
uses
Code
Other:
A 5 "7 ^ "f+
*1^'" 5^;/'/- S)(r (If jaJj
fl# cori- _/*•-
' Lol\*c\-#k A- JrA Cfii
' ^|, OHm ' N
/fle t o f~
r c,y> '*y
-------
m
EA Engineering Science
UTHOLOG1C LOG
Sediment Collection Log
& Technology, fnc PSC
Client Na-ne snd Project Name
r -> ~
! « i V i i i\r, -a r
Locaiion/Bonng Name
¦-1 }
Sheet
Oe I
1
Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project' Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
if" , ' r - ¦
\gr\
n^nrison
8 Start Date/Time
: >" i -(
Stop Oate/Time
!,„¦ i.:r'v-/s
t i r
2
DrilSmg Subcontractor/Equfpmenl Operator
6 lattude/NorthirgJGna
9 Setl Surface Elevation
f? , L
I
n
¦ / 1 • f
/.!'
; 1 ,, . < M •. 1 * ; ' / 1
10 Coordinate System
H t C "
V
ii" fn,;
n/ '
11 Depth of Watet ft (siafjendi
3
Operate" Nana (License # If Require!)
7 Longitbd§?Easting>'Gntf
'f i/V I
if
1 J fl'v f)
''¦'i
^ i 1 . r ^ ' - i
12 Weather (Temp, ore's conditions wind drrectom
, 1 f*7 'Sunny/Cloudy;'Ram r i
t'
4
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check Ones
13 Bonng Depth (ft!
14. Recovery (ft)
^5
!v. Recovery
Rotoson:c -ft barrel -in diameter
Core, -ft barrel -in diameter Manual PushA/ibracore
i -l
Grab Sample- !J
-ft X -ft x
0.-- "ft Box;Ponar/7an Veen/Other
15 Location Notes
nr ,
, F/
' i •
Other;
z(I
'
Sample Collection Method:
. ¦ - ,i
interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials 1
Vacr ^evJirwn' tvpu color, pr^serc* of 3AV rc;K, :>¦ Vf: ¦ ) [ •>.
: i , ] , ;
> i w
f
" ¦ p n
f 7
I 4 0(1 cutset i,v>,
-------
Bg#i LITH0L0G1C LOG
Sediment Collecfon Log
EA Engineering. Science & Technology, Inc, PBC
Ciient Name and Frojeci Name
GLA1^
K^'Lut < pm - ...ii,1
Location,'Boring Ns-ne
Sheet
1 of t
\
Geo ogist Name/S.gnalure
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
f' ,
: r ¦'
• \25S' >J
a Start Date/Time
v' r ¦ • 'L1
Stop DatefTime
2
Drilling SuDcontraclODEquipmenl Operator
8 ;lTatrtude/tsiarlh ~
1 " ¦ > ' [ft;
12 Weather iTsmp, circle conditions wind direction;
Surtny/Cloudyj'Ram f ^ t
4
Samp trig Equipment ana Methodology (Check Onei
13 Boring Depth fftl
1" Recovery If!!
'5
Ts Recovery
Rotosonic; -ft barrel -in diameter
Q
0
Core: -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
¦
->
Grab Sample: f-
-ft X -ft X
(.>.= -ft Box^Ponar/ /art Veen/Other
16 Location Notes
.... j J, «.r S a ,<¦
Other:
? *
Sample Collection Method:
? (1!
11
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Ma,c-r Sedimsn! type, color, presence c' SAY'rocxwccs ride,'sheer r;tf er \nc\
Sample ID
uses
Cods
J1-0 0 (pr-
i ,r
IT Z4!?
" — /<"? '^Yf y-'i -H-'
5'^ A
-------
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, hie , PBC
Client Name and Project Name
GLAES
Harbortown - Upstream
Location,'Boring Name
Sheet
i of ?
I Geologist Marre/Signature
k>
5 Project Number
6256136
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Start Date/Time
'-11 -1' '
Stop Date/Time
ii ,m>
'/ !
2 Dnlling Sut>conirac!or>'Equi1oment Operator
S Laiiiutfei'Northng/Grd
9 Sed Surface Elevation
i'. o
10 Coordinate System
H Mr
v \i if -v
11 Deptti of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (license # If Required}
7 LongituiJe/Easting'Grid
Ft
12 leather iTerrip cr'c]e,conditions, wind direction)
_ 1 Sunny,'Cloudy/Rain >
Sampling Equipmen! and Methodology (Check One;
Rotosomc. -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel _
Grab Sample: C -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
3 Borng Depth ift> 14 Recovery (ft) 15 v Recovery
-in diameter Manuaf Pusb/Vibracore
-ftx i ;i -ft Box'Ponart'/an Veen/Other
16 Location Notes
rW-R
Interval
fDepths
Description of Materials
I 'a; r ''hJ i ie t ~ «- -Itr gpsera a' 'i-Vroik tood, etbfcfeei 3*ner re u:cns
Sample ID
A rf^'sl:
uses
Code
Other:
J ¦* Ojq. r\ •£ {-' f.£ c # Vvy-A„ -
-------
m
LITHOlOGfC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science & Technology, frx , PBC
Cirent Narre and Project Name
arbortown - Upstream
LoeatiorvBonng Narre
HT18- V.O
Sheet
of
1 Geologist Name/SignaSjre
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Start Date/Tfme
),xym/v
Stop DatelTlme
2 Drilling Subcontractor'Equitxneni Operator
6 'iaWudeifJorthingiGnd
Sed Sur*ace Elevation
10 Coordinate System
H
3 Operator Name (Ltceira; # If Required)
7 Longr.udefEastmg/Gr d
11 Depth of Water ft istart/end)
12 Weather (Temp, circle^conditions wind direction!
j>unny/Cloudy/Ra:r / '
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check Ore)
Rotosonic -ft barrel -in diameter
Core -ft barret
Grab Sample; C -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft! 14 Recovery Ifti 15 A Recovery
-in diameter Manual PushA/ibracore
-ft x -ft Box'Ponar/Van Veen/Other
16 Location Kotes
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Manir atcireittyne,too- pteseicce'SATr Aac" odor'snaen other md..sina-
Sample ID
uses
Code
Other:
J*—**
i
i
117 ) 5 ai WJc cort,
I ' -II ¦¦¦ . , -
; o ' f 1 ; fy
I JuV rltwbff '5, 0 ft-
J &*.}£- rfii-fei m ctr#
-------
LiTHOLGGIC LOG
Sediment Call&ctian Log
C:«nt Name ard Project Name
J.
Locatian.'Bonng Name
Sneet
of i
Geo'&g'st Name/Signature
5 Prqect Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Start Date/Time
U/l/riflfk'/rV4i%i
¦J_n
Stop Date/Time
2 DnNing Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 Cat tude/North ng^Gnd
9 Sed Surface Elevation ^ k.
/ 0
10 Coordinate System H I h
V > MP
Operaior Name (License # If Required]
7 'LongiiutteEastmg'G^Si
-H )
11 Depth of Water, ft fpiartferd)
1 "l " ''
12 Weather ^Temp, circle conditions w nd direct'om
1 ' " ,Sunn^'Cloudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology |Chec* One?
Rotosome: -f! barrel -in diameter
Core -ft barrel
Grab Sample- 'J -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boppg Depth (ft)
¦in diameter Manual PushA/ibracore
¦ft x •' : -ft Box'Ponar/i/an Veen/Other
14 Recovery (ft)
15 M,_ Recove
-------
LSTHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, inc PBC
Client Name and Project Na«ne
GLAES
Harbortown - Uustreim
Location/Boring Name
HT18- J ~S
Sheet
of i
Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
2 Drilfmg Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
Lstitude'N'orthna/Gnd
9 Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
H m, r.,
V i'F^J r/P.'.
11 Depth of Water (sfarlfend)
3 Operator Name (Ucense # if Required)
7 Long i tucfe/Ea sti p g' Gn d
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy/Ram
Sampling Equrpmern and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic. -fl barrel -in diameter
Gore; -ft barrel _
Grata Sample: C -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth {*{;¦
-in diameter Manual PushA/ibracore
-ft x -ft Box'Ponar/ /an Veen/Other
14 Recovery (ft!
15 % Recovery
16 Location Notes
Interval
{Depth!
Description of Materials
JterSeJiTPff.type,color, presenceofSAy.'rotx.'wcac, odor'shesr otherii
Sample !D
uses
Code
Other:
-------
E
ft
EA Engineering, Science
LITHCLOG'C LOG
Sediment Collection Log
& Technology Inc, PBC
Cfrent Kane and Project Name
^i ^
o .nvn -_ it
LocatiOTBoring Name
1 r ^
She®!
E Of
i
Geologist Mame/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
>f\
r^iw\ fwrs-
HTM
S
Start Datefrime
H V
Stop Date/Time
A K/mV ; J ,
2
Drill-ng Suteamracar/Equipment Operator
6 j Latttuctei'NorthingfGrid
9
Sed Surface Elevation >.
o
ft.
A? ^ f/=
•j •( f
10
Coordrnate System
h m i:1
V
M..
>¦' ¦
11
Depth cf Water fi tetarcendj
3
Operate Name fL/cense # ReQkfrecft
7 ( Longitude/Eastma/Grid
/ < ^
- "¦ / i
\J -Ft, (J<$ f\4j'iV
*T - "' ''' " ii
12
Weatner iTemp, orclej;a,Tiditions, wind diw.,onl
Siinny/Cioudy.'Pain >' ( k '
4
Sam nil rig Equipment and Methodology (Check One;
13
Boring Depth ift)
14 Recovery 'ft!
15
>!, Recovery
Rotosonic. -ft barrel -in diameter
\ '
m
Core: -ft barrel -in diameter Manual PushA/ibracore
f "
,i 1 -
,»,
Grab Sample' s'
-ft X -ft X
'),£ -ft Box'Ponar/ /an Veen/Other
18
Location Notes
Other:
of %
7
Sample Collection Methc
d
Interval
fOepffil
Macr Sedimer
Description of Materials J
•"/pe cJi'r, prf-tneeo* jAvtc.VwkJ, reiv^hef", otter mcl 4Sc.rL
Sample ID
uses
Cock-
C T i ^
w^n'V S4V
:t
H
t ! ¦
Other:
r-ecQvt
,sf
* ^ 1 f) ' i-/V -} v'~~
'oM^f J" "k §/" <^ 1 > ft¦ Aujk n-o 4—** (h®
!K$£-
1*7 / 5" 3
e*j\ IV f* p*->K ™ ^^5^ 4fo car^C
<0- r C5 < ^lA"] /|f p/o&fcr.. .•:/>¦
-------
W
LITHOLOGIC LOG:
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering Science, & Technology inc, P8C
CFient Name ar-d Project Narrs
m hi . -I ' „ r?\r
Location.'Bor.ng Narre
Sheet
i Ot )
1 Geoiogrst Name/Signature
f
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Tims
\©
2 Onilirg Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 Xatitucie/Kortmnq/Gnd
9 Sec! Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
H V V h
3 Operator Name (License # 'f Required}
11 Depth o* Water, ft (starl/end*
7 Longitucie'Edstmg'G'HcI
12 Weather (Temp, circ'e conditions wr»d direction!
n Sunny,'Cloudy/Rain // <
Sampling Equinrrent ana Vethodo'ogy (Check Onel
Rotosonic -ft barrel -in diameter
Core, -ft barrel _____ -in diameter Manual PushA/ibracore
Grab Sample " -ft x ____ -ft x '.S -ft Boji'Ponar/'/an Veen/Other
Other:
Sample Collection Method
13 ; Boring Depth ifti
r
&
14 Recovery (It?
T5 "¦ Recovery
16 Location Notes
..p
Interval
fDeprt i
Description of Materials
VapfMO rent typ», tti.o* stwrs ot SfWrm.r/vKOC odrr-!s"eei, rjtf»' inclusion^
Sample ID
uses
Code
Other;
I LOP t ^ T 4fc 'ytX 5*
T\V pid" cko A.trh~ pipc-rc,
' , i_ I I ' r *" '' ' ! /
I <*?'¦ •' ; f+- — „ r v
-------
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment CoHscton Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, ire PBC
Client Name and Project Mame
Harbortown - Upstream
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
of "
1 Geclcgrst Name/Signature
6 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Start Daterrirne
Stop Date/Time
j 1 ¦' t 1 i '/ 111 *'•l;
",t.' ,*'u l
11 Depth of Water, ft i start/end i
' ,M -
2 Dr ilmg Suoconvactor,'Equipment Operator
uat>tude/NortnT.g''Gfia
3 Ooerato' Name \ License # If Required)
,*T! . ^1. ...»
7 Longitude/EastingiGnd
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction!
5unny|Cloudy/Ra
r !
Samp trig Equipment and Metnodology (Check Onsj
Rotosonic -ft barrel _____ -in diameter
Cere -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Pushft/ibracore
Grab Sample; o -ft x -ft x 0.? -ft BoxJPonar/ /an Veen/Other
Other;
13 Bonng Depth iftt
14 Recovery fit;
ta Recovery
16 Location Notes. is /*»/.,
f u A -¦f 11 ^ 1
Sample Collection Method:
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Major Seiitrcn: lypu. co';r, presence o'tAV'rc.'ji.'acr,,-; ode chen. rtrer inrl'i'n-i ¦¦
Sample ID
uses
Code
r-
h
-------
E
^ L1THOLOG1C LOG
Client Name ard Project Name
LocafiomBonng Name
Sheet
Seamen? Co'7ec?ion Log
'iUfi
HT1R, 1 (m
' of
EA Engineering Science, £ Technology, inc , PBC
f 1 '' i . -i
8 Start Date/Time
/.
\ n
Stop Dtte'Time
2
Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
X
6 LaHucie/North ng^Gna
9 Sed Surface Elevation
"
ft
' ^ ^ f'
10 Coordinate System
h i'1' '"'m.
V vf.V,.,
s V . L „
11 Depth cf Water, 1istart'ench
3
Operator NaTie (License # if Required)
JF"
7 Lorgituaei'Easting/Gnd
t
s:r ?v
12 Weather (Temp, circle,conditions wmd direction?
v 1 f f*yv&w"^
r i ^ 'M ii >
I ( "« ' , 1 i , 1
* \t
Sunny/Clcudy/^ain
4
Samping Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
13 Borng Dccth ffti
14 Recovery
15
"*ii Recovety
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Pusb/Vibracore
Grab Sample 'j -ft x -ft x
-ft Box'Ponar/ /an Veen/Other
16 Location Notes
SemdA a~f M- >W
Other:
Sample Collection Method
Interval
(Depth!
Description of Materials
>Vb|Cf Sed ncinyisa :c j p-eccve cf VYocr-a^.-M: Oder sheer oir ur irir. i._;:m:
, rAiw ftrai
«i4"I
Sample ID
uses
Code
Other:
t^/yffSS 1 t Cd + 4"
-------
B&
LSTHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, inc , PBC
Client Narre and Project f.arre
- Upstream
LocationfBonng Name
; , f
S fleet
of
1 Geologist Siams/S-gnature
k - - I
5 Project NuTibe*
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Start Date/Time
i t?t)
Stop Date/Time
1-i p/^/ i ri
r Hwr 'f 10
2 Dnling Subconlractor/Equipmen! Operator
La'jluaeJNorthmg/Gnff
9 Sed Surface Etevston
n.
>4-4,
10 Coordinate System H
\ I • i fin .
11 Death of Water, ft (sta-t/enal
3 Operator Name (License # IfReauired)
,-"T
" v, ' W ^ t-> 1 *"
tongitiide/Eastmg'Gnd
t2 Weather iTemp arcle_corTdi',iors, wind airectoii
, \ ' SjrnJ'Clourtyi'Pain
4 Sampi,r,g Equipment and Methodology {Check One)
Rotosonic -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel
Grab Sampfe' c -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Bornq Depth ,s V
'(/ 'f
Other;
—f~
¦tfl-1'
f
coft,
for sJfi^
1 ft*
A ^,5 b-^4-
f , ^ {}, J-'f-r
tm Z-Yf •%'
a > 1 lh
p^r ,
^ V*
-------
LITHOLQGIC LOG
S&dfment Collection Leg
EA Engineering, $ ounce & Technology !nc P3C
C«ient Kane arid Project Name
0 ' =
H h ¦> i: -1 -. . , r ¦ ,
Locatron/Botirg Name
• - i . '
Sheet
of 1
t
Geo'ogist Name/S'gnature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
' ,-^v,
.
8 Start Date/Time
.'l^rcy V-;-:
Stop Date/Time
,i /7 i .¦ r<'
2
Drii.-ng Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
\
s Latitude/Nort h i ng/Grid
9. Sea Surface Eievatron
ft
' / ¦ " \ f\ ^ s - ,1
10 Coo'drnate System
H ': .i i
11 Depth of Water, ft fstart/endi
3
Operator Name (License # If Required)
f !
7 Longitude/Easting/Grrd
k ,
u K ^
12 Weather ^Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
' ,r '; ^ - Sunn^/Cloud//Ram
&
Sampling Equipment and Melhodology {Check One)
13 Borng Depth (ftj
14. Recovery fftl
15
% Recovery
Rotosomc; -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
Grab Sample: 0 -ft x -ft x
Other:
'Is" -ft Box'Ponar/ /an Veen/Other
16 L^ualion Nuteb
.. 1
Sample Collection Method:
t.
Interval
(Deplhj
Description of Materials
Ma,nr Gec-rent tvcc <-a or r'ere-rectSH.'roO Annd.ciirVsen, i'tht" r
Sample ID
uses
Code
Other:
. , , _ -L (#<' tf A, }f^m\ lt'Y\
„ f .1 I
-------
m
A
LrriQLQGIC LOG
Ghent Name and Project Name
Lcca'.icn/Sonng Name
Sheet
Sediment Collection Log
't M
of t
EA Engtn&enng, Science,
& Technology, Inc PSC
I-! 'r 11 i| si i t-iti
1
Geologist Na*ne/S>gnaiure
5 Proiect Numoer
CORE COLLECTION INFO
^ I 1V
B Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
' , ' f !
, y c> | r ?
r-/l "t;
J )C
;? /
i : -
2
Drilling Subcontfactor/EquipTient Operator
6 LatitudeiKortning/Gnd
9 3ed Surface Eevation
jT \ ift
ft
/ M J_5 / wf
f y ' • * ' ' 1
10 Coordinate System
H ^ <
V
U'V'D^I
11 DepSh of Water ft istafWend}
3
Operator Name (License # tf Required)
7 Longitude/Easting''Gnd
\Jq€s
f ' i ' ' .3 1 '
12 Weather 'Jenp, circle conditions, wind direction)
s _ S'unnyCloudy/Rain
4
Sampling Equipment ana Methodology (Check One)
13 Bo^rg Depth ;ft:
14 Recovery (ft!
T5
7i Recovery
Rotosomc: -ft barrel -in diameter
1 "
2$
Core -ft barrel -in diameter Manual PushA/ibracore
-
Grab Sample, "J
-ft X -ft X
> -ft Box'Ponar/ Jan Veen/Other
16 ^ZZ3> ?r ',z\CS
6
Other:
Sample Collection Method.
Interval
Description of Materials
I
Sample !D
'""uses"
(Depth)
Motor osStn.en! type calor pr««r« of S-V.'-ncksraDtf, cdcr sheet c-.e"p;
Code
- >-<>- v ?• -
• —
I J,i lnt% of 5"
'[V
^ S I t* fC- 1 1 C
r
Other:
K-4,
I r f ,, |f o
I
-------
L1THOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, frtc. PBC
Client Name and Project Nane
Harbortown - Upstream
LocaticnfBomfj Name
¦ i:
Sheet
of f
Geologist Name/Signature
f , «7,
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Start Dat»/Time
ft f.:--:
Stop DatWTim®
I "¦ U: i ^ /1
2 Drilling Subcontractor-'Equipment Operator
fnL.r* IA .
( ^ 0 fAA |/1,c • f x / ••
6- JuMituf'e.'Nor* ning'Gnd
9 5ed Surface Elevation
10 coordinate System
H
V WD-M
11 Depth of Water, ft (staKencij
3 Operator Name (license # IfReqwmll
Longitude/Easting. Grid
a q <3 ij,
i ii.
fV
*s»
12 Weatner iTemp. circle corditions, wind ejection}
C.-f . '' ^'SurnyJCloudy'Rain >j , •
Samplmg Equipment and Methodology iCheck One)
Roiosonic -ft barrel1 -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel
0 -ft X
13 Boring Depth ifti
Grab Sample'
Other:
Sample Collection Method.
•in diameter Manual Pusb/Vtbracore
ft x it,7 -ft Box'Ponar/Van Veen/Other
14 Recover/(ft)
15 % Recovery
15 Location Note
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
WaicrSsdnerttyw rain, pfp^^'WifSWraM^ccc ciWsVtn ether p-iiscns
Sample ID
uses
Code
Other:
-------
-------
EftHk LiTHOlOG'C log
Sed/menf Collection Log
£71 Engineering Science, & Technology, Inc , PSC
Cl ent Name and Project Name
oUl t£3
f; ^ uc h \ m - L p*rre.M *
Locat'oi/Boring Name
1-18 \ j-
Sheet
i of i
t
Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
r
3 Iru l Ir.
8 Start Date/Time
-.'v
Stop Date/Time
W.-l".*" ' -
- ¦ / i -
2
Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 f Latitudfe/Nor.Ji rg/Gnd
9 Sea Surface Efevat?on
;• C, r
n
~l - i " ' ¦ I ^
1 * ^ ' ,'1
; - fi 1 » * i
10 Coordmate Systerr
H , 1 '
V
t ,L . '
- - • • •
11 Depth of Water ft 'start'ench
3
Operator Name (License * It Required)
7 i-ongitudfe/Eastirg/Grid
\ ( 1
- -1 i ', t' "i ' i
P
12 WeatheriTemo ardpconditions wird direction
-* 1 1 f&unny'Cfoucty'Ran , h' f %
I ! f- i —, - 1 - i
4
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
13 Boring Depth ffri
14 Recovery (fti
15
cu Recovery
Rotcsomc. -ft barrel -in diameter
-
1
if)
:
Core: -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
4 t 1J
I
>
Grab Sample:
-ft X -ft X
'>? -ft Box^Ponar/Van Veen/Other
16 Lccation Notes
f kit".ft'
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
fA> ^
-'f4L , *"y
/«
J
-------
Appendix B
Lithologic Core Logs
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
E
38
jSSSSf* SEDIMENT BORING HT18-01
' Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
LOCATION Detroit, MI
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/29/2018 3:10:00 PM
LATITUDE 42° 21.360451
DATE/TIME LOGGED
10/30/2018 9:40:00 AM
LONGITUDE 82= 56.568433
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
ELEVATION 568.2 ft (NAVD 88)
DRILLING METHOD
Vibracore
(Sediment Surface)
LOGGED BY
E Cline
RECOVERY 93.7 %
g
LU 3
Q2
_i
<
>
cr
LU
i—
-Z.
LU „
—I (/)
CL d)
3 "
LU
CL
>-
I—
LU
_l
CL
<
CO
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
3
D
_i
J
r
ZL
<
Y.
3
CO
CO
<
_l
o
CO
o
CO
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
_c
"o.
(D
Q
12
Composite
HT18-01-0010
ML
SILT WITH SAND: Dark gray (10YR 4/1), silt,
some f-m sand, trace roots and shell. PID = 0.4
ppm
2 -
24
Composite
HT18-01-1030
vw
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
vw
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
VW
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
^ CL-ML
LEAN CLAY AND SILT: Dark gray (10YR 4/1),
clay, some f. sand; silt, some clay, trace granules
and shell. PID = 0.5 ppm
4 -
24
Composite
HT18-01-3050
ML
SILT: Dark gray (10YR 4/1), silt, some clay, trace
roots and shell. PID = 0.6 ppm
SILT AND SAND: Dark gray (10YR 4/1),
alternating layers of: silt, some clay; and vf. sand,
some silt, trace pebbles. PID = 0.6 ppm
6 -
24
Composite
HT18-01-5070
ML-SP
8 -
19.2
Composite
HT18-01-7085
/ /
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
/ /
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ /
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
'//
; ML-CL
SILT AND LEAN CLAY: Dark gray (10YR 3/1), silt,
some clay; and clay, some silt, trace shell and
organics; thin bed off. sand, some silt at 7.8-7.9
ft. PID = 0.7 ppm
End of Boring at 8.8 ft.
NOTES:
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate °/
3 recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
SEDIMENT BORING HT18-02
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/29/2018 3:45:00 PM
DATE/TIME LOGGED 10/30/2018 11:00:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
DRILLING METHOD Vibracore
LOGGED BY E Cline
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
LATITUDE 42 21 325964
LONGITUDE 82° 56.779133
ELEVATION 565.2 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 90 %
3g
id
<
>
01
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
CD
O
_i
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
Composite
HT18-02-0010
ML
SANDY SILT: Dark gray (10YR 4/1), f. sandy silt,
some clay, trace shell and construction debris.
PID = 0.5 ppm
24
Composite
HT18-02-1030
SP-SC
POORLY GRADED SAND WITH CLAY: Dark
gray (10YR 4/1), f. sand, some clay. PID = 0.3
ppm
37.2
Composite
20.4
Composite
HT18-02-3060
HT18-02-6080
SP-SC
POORLY GRADED SAND WITH CLAY: Dark
gray (10YR 4/1), f. sand, some clay, trace m.
sand. PID = 0.2 ppm
SW-SM
WELL GRADED SAND WITH SILT: Black (10YR
2/1), f-vc sand, some silt and stiff clay nodules.
PID = 0.6 ppm
16.8
Composite
HT18-02-8090
SM
SILTY SAND: Very dark gray (10YR 3/1), silty f.
sand, trace clay. PID = 0.5 ppm
NOTES:
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
SEDIMENT BORING HT18-03
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/29/2018 5:20:00 PM
DATE/TIME LOGGED 10/30/2018 1:55:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
DRILLING METHOD Vibracore
LOGGED BY E Cline
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
LATITUDE 42 21 533856
LONGITUDE 82 57 306525
ELEVATION 557.8 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 94.4 %
3g
id
<
>
01
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
CD
O
_i
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
Composite
HT18-03-0010
ML-OL
SILT WITH SAND: Very dark gray (10YR 3/1),
silt, some vf. sand, trace m-c sand and organics.
Hydrocarbon odor. PID = 0.2 ppm
24
Composite
HT18-03-1030
OL
ORGANIC SILT WITH SAND: Very dark gray
(10YR 3/1), organic silt, some vf. sand, trace m-c
sand. Hydrocarbon odor. PID = 8.0 ppm
19.2
Composite
HT18-03-3045
OL
ORGANIC SILT: Black (10YR 2/1), organic silt,
trace f-c sand and roots. PID = 8.5 ppm
16.8
Composite
HT18-03-4560
CH
FAT CLAY: Dark gray (10Y 4/1), stiff clay, few f.
sand, trace granules and pebbles. PID = 0.9 ppm
OL
ORGANIC SILT WITH SAND: Black (10YR 2/1),
organic silt, some f-m sand, trace granules,
pebbles, and c. sand. PID = 3.0 ppm
End of Boring at 6.3 ft.
NOTES:
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
SEDIMENT BORING HT18-04
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/29/2018 11 55:00 AM
DATE/TIME LOGGED 10/29/2018 3:20:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
DRILLING METHOD Vibracore
LOGGED BY E Cline
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
LATITUDE 42 21 291181
LONGITUDE 82 57 042887
ELEVATION 566.9 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 70 %
3g
id
<
>
cr
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
1
CL
<
cr
o
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
7.2
Composite
HT18-04-0005
32.4
Composite
HT18-04-0530
SP-SC
CL
POORLY GRADED SAND WITH CLAY: Gray
(10YR 5/1), f. sand, some clay, few c. sand, trace
granules. Bed of organic silt at top 0.2 ft. PID =
0.2 ppm
LEAN CLAY WITH SAND: Dark gray (10YR 4/1),
clay, some vf. sand, trace c. sand. Thin bed off.
sand, some clay at 1,1-1.2-ft. PID = 0.3 ppm
12
Composite
HT18-04-3040
SW-SC
WELL GRADED SAND WITH CLAY: Black
(10YR 2/1), f-vc sand, trace clay and wood, fining
upward to f. sand, some clay. PID = 0.2 ppm
End of Boring at 6 ft.
NOTES:
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
SEDIMENT BORING HT18-05
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/29/2018 4:35:00 PM
DATE/TIME LOGGED 10/30/2018 4:30:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
DRILLING METHOD Vibracore
LOGGED BY E Cline
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
LATITUDE 42 21 313827
LONGITUDE 82° 57.217096
ELEVATION 559.8 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 84.6 %
3g
id
<
>
01
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
CD
O
_i
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
Composite
HT18-05-0010
ML
SILT WITH SAND: Gray (2.5YR 5/1), silt, some
vf. sand, trace organics. PID = 0.2 ppm
20.4
Composite
HT18-05-1030
ML-OL
SILT: Dark gray (2.5YR 4/1), silt, some clay, trace
vf. sand, wood, and roots; bed of organics at 1-1.3
ft. PID = 0.2ppm
28.2
Composite
HT18-05-3050
OL
ORGANIC SILT WITH SAND: Black (2.5YR
2.5/1), organic silt, some f-m sand, trace roots and
c. sand. PID = 3.1 ppm
10.2
Composite
HT18-05-5060
SM
SILTY SAND: Very dark gray (2.5YR 3/1), silty
f-m sand, trace shell; thin layer of stiff clay at 5.1
ft. PID = 0.8 ppm
End of Boring at 6.5 ft.
NOTES:
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
SEDIMENT BORING HT18-06
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/29/2018 11 20:00 AM
DATE/TIME LOGGED 10/29/2018 2:10:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
DRILLING METHOD Vibracore
LOGGED BY E Cline
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
LATITUDE 42 21 270563
LONGITUDE 82° 57.289438
ELEVATION 558.3 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 92 %
3g
id
<
>
01
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
CD
O
_i
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
Composite
HT18-06-0010
ML
SILT: Dark gray (10YR 4/1), silt, some clay, trace
organics. PID = 0.1 ppm
24
Composite
HT18-06-1030
ML-CL
SILT: Dark gray (10YR 4/1), clayey silt, trace
organics. PID = 0.1ppm
36
Composite
HT18-06-3060
13.2
Composite
HT18-06-6070
MH-OH
ELASTIC SILT: Very dark gray (10YR 3/1), clayey
silt, trace m-c sand interbedded with organic
layers. Hydrocarbon odor. PID = 1.3ppm
SP-SM
POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT: Dark gray
(10YR 4/1), f-m sand, some silt, trace organics,
shell, and angular pebbles. PID = 4.2 ppm
12
19.2
Composite
Composite
HT18-06-7080
HT18-06-8010
OH
OH
ORGANIC SILT WITH SAND: Black (1YR 2/1),
organic silt, some f-m sand, trace wood and
cultural debris (i.e. comb). PID = 4.2 ppm
ORGANIC SILT: Very dark gray (10YR 3/1),
organic silt and clay, some sand, trace pebbles.
Hydrocarbon odor. PID = 10.3 ppm
10
NOTES:
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
SEDIMENT BORING HT18-07
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/29/2018 10:30:00 AM
DATE/TIME LOGGED 10/29/2018 2:30:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
DRILLING METHOD Vibracore
LOGGED BY E Cline
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
LOCATION Detroit, MI
LATITUDE 42 21 272053
LONGITUDE 82° 57.468904
ELEVATION 565.3 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 86 %
3g
id
<
>
01
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
CD
O
_i
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
21.6
Composite
HT18-07-0020
SP-SM
POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT: Dark gray
(10YR 4/1), f-m sand, some silt. PID = 0.4 ppm
36
Composite
HT18-07-2050
MH
ELASTIC SILT WITH SAND: Black (10YR 2/1),
clayey silt, some vf. sand and organics.
Hydrocarbon odor. PID = 15.2 ppm
26.4
Composite
HT18-07-5070
ML
SILT WITH SAND: Very dark gray (10YR 3/1),
silt, some vf. sand; thin layers off. sand and clay,
some silt, trace shell. PID = 4.1 ppm
22.8
Composite
HT18-07-7090
ML
SANDY SILT: Black (10YR 2/1), f. sandy silt,
some clay. Hydrocarbon odor with clay at base.
PID = 9.4 ppm
NOTES:
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
SEDIMENT BORING HT18-08
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/22/2018 5:30:00 PM
DATE/TIME LOGGED 10/23/2018 5:10:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
DRILLING METHOD Vibracore
LOGGED BY E Cline
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
LATITUDE 42 21 286307
LONGITUDE 82° 57.54814
ELEVATION 566.6 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 80 %
3g
id
<
>
01
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
CD
O
_i
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
Composite
HT18-08-0010
ML
SILT: Dark gray (10YR 4/1), silt, some vf. sand,
trace clay and roots. PID = 0.3ppm
15.6
Composite
HT18-08-1020
ML
SILT: Dark gray (10YR 4/1), silt, some vf. sand,
trace clay and roots; some granules at base. PID
= 0.2 ppm
27.6
Composite
HT18-08-2045
SW
WELL GRADED SAND: Bluish black (10B 2.5/1),
f-vc sand, few pebbles, trace silt and granules.
Whole clamshell. Hydrocarbon odor. PID = 0.5
ppm
22.8
Composite
HT18-08-4565
SP-SM
POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT: Bluish
black (10B 2.5/1) to dark gray (10YR 4/1), f. sand,
some silt; bed of silt, some c. sand at top 0.3 ft.
PID = 4.4 ppm
18
Composite
HT18-08-6580
SP-SM
POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT: Dark gray
(10YR 4/1), f. sand, some silt. PID = 0.5 ppm
NOTES:
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
SEDIMENT BORING HT18-09
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/22/2018 4:30:00 PM
DATE/TIME LOGGED 10/23/2018 1:45:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
DRILLING METHOD Vibracore
LOGGED BY E Cline
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
LATITUDE 42 21 289201
LONGITUDE 82 57 670667
ELEVATION 565.7 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 96 %
3g
id
<
>
01
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
CD
O
_i
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
Composite
HT18-09-0010
ML
SILT: Dark greenish gray (10YR 4/1), wet, silt,
little f. sand, trace clay. PID = 1.7 ppm
24
Composite
HT18-09-1030
ML
SILT: Dark greenish gray (10YR 4/1), wet, silt,
little f. sand, trace clay and roots. PID = 1.4 ppm
24
Composite
HT18-09-3050
ML
SILT: Dark greenish gray (10YR 4/1), wet, silt,
little f. sand, trace clay and roots. Hydrocarbon
odor. PID = 1.2 ppm
24
Composite
HT18-09-5070
ML
SILT: Dark greenish gray (10YR 3/1), silt, some
clay, trace organics and roots. Dark black layer
with hydrocarbon odor at 5.3 ft. PID = 0.8 ppm
32.4
Composite
HT18-09-7010
ML
SILT: Dark greenish gray (10YR 3/1), silt, some
clay, trace f. sand, organics, and roots. PID = 0.6
ppm
10
NOTES: End of Boring at 10 ft.
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
SEDIMENT BORING HT18-10
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/22/2018 3:55:00 PM
DATE/TIME LOGGED 10/24/2018 9:40:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
DRILLING METHOD Vibracore
LOGGED BY E Cline
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
LATITUDE 42 21 289611
LONGITUDE 82° 57.782160
ELEVATION 570.4 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 52.5 %
3g
id
<
>
01
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
CO
CO
o
o
<
_i
1
o
CL
CO
<
o
cr
CO
o
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12.6
Composite
HT18-10-0010
SW
WELL GRADED SAND: Dark gray (10YR 4/1),
vf-m clean sand, few angular pebbles, trace shell.
PID = 0.2 ppm
End of Boring at 2 ft.
NOTES:
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
SEDIMENT BORING HT18-11
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/22/2018 3:21:00 PM
DATE/TIME LOGGED 10/24/2018 8:30:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
DRILLING METHOD Vibracore
LOGGED BY E Cline
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
LATITUDE 42 21 309866
LONGITUDE 82 57 925609
ELEVATION 566 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 94 %
3g
id
<
>
01
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
CD
O
_i
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
Composite
HT18-11-0010
ML
SILT: Dark gray (10YR 4/1), soft, wet, silt, trace
plant debris. PID = 0.2ppm
24
Composite
HT18-11-1030
ML
SILT: Dark gray (10YR 4/1), soft, wet, silt, trace f.
sand and plant debris. PID = 0.2 ppm
24
Composite
HT18-11-3050
SM
SANDY SILT: Very dark gray (10YR 3/1), f. sandy
silt, some clay, trace organics, fining upward from
f. sand with silt. PID = 0.2 ppm
24
Composite
HT18-11-5070
SP-SM
POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT: Dark gray
(10YR 4/1), f. sand, some silt, trace organics. PID
= 0.2 ppm
10
28.8
Composite
HT18-11-7010
SP-SM
POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT: Dark gray
(10YR 4/1), f. sand, some silt. PID = 0.2 ppm
NOTES: End of Boring at 10 ft.
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
SEDIMENT BORING HT18-12
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/22/2018 2:20:00 PM
DATE/TIME LOGGED 10/23/2018 3:40:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
DRILLING METHOD Vibracore
LOGGED BY E Cline
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
LATITUDE 42 21 331013
LONGITUDE 82° 58.089107
ELEVATION 568.7 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 97 %
3g
id
<
>
01
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
CD
O
_i
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
Composite
HT18-12-0010
ML
SANDY SILT: Dark gray (7.5YR 4/1), soft, wet, vf.
sandy silt, trace organics. PID = 31.8 ppm
24
Composite
HT18-12-1030
ML
SANDY SILT: Black (5YR 2.5/1), soft, wet, vf.
sandy silt, trace clay and organics; interbedded
with f. sand some silt. Hydrocarbon odor. PID =
17.2 ppm
24
Composite
HT18-12-3050
SP-SM
POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT: Black
(5YR 2.5/1), vf-f sand, some silt, few granules and
interbedded clay. PID = 2.2 ppm
24
Composite
HT18-12-5070
CL
LEAN CLAY WITH SAND: Dark gray (7.5YR 4/1),
clay, some f. sand, trace granules, pebbles, and
wood; fining upward from clayey sand. PID = 1.1
ppm
32.4
Composite
HT18-12-7010
CL
LEAN CLAY WITH SAND: Dark gray (7.5YR 4/1),
low to medium plastic clay, some f. sand. PID =
22.8 ppm
10
NOTES: End of Boring at 10 ft.
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
SEDIMENT BORING HT18-13
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/29/2018 9:50:00 AM
DATE/TIME LOGGED 10/29/2018 5:55:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
DRILLING METHOD Vibracore
LOGGED BY E Cline
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
LATITUDE 42 21 313187
LONGITUDE 82 58 382027
ELEVATION 561.8 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 96 %
3g
id
<
>
01
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
CD
O
_i
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
Composite
HT18-13-0010
ML
SILT WITH SAND: Dark gray (10YR 4/1), silt,
some vf-m sand, trace shells and pebbles. PID =
0.5 ppm
24
Composite
HT18-13-1030
ML
SILT: Dark gray (10YR 4/1), silt, trace clay and f.
sand. Hydrocarbon odor. PID = 1.5 ppm
24
Composite
HT18-13-3050
ML
SILT: Dark gray (10YR 4/1), silt, some clay, trace
f. sand and shell. PID = 0.5 ppm
15.6
Composite
HT18-13-5060
CL
LEAN CLAY: Dark gray (10YR 4/1), clay, some
silt, trace f. sand and shell. PID = 0.9 ppm
30
Composite
15.6
Composite
HT18-13-6090
HT18-13-9010
ML
SILT: Very dark gray, (10YR 3/1), silt, some clay,
trace f. sand and shell; thin layers of clay with
trace f. sand and shell. PID = 0.5 ppm
SP-SM
POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT: Very dark
gray (10YR 3/1), f. sand, some silt, trace c. sand,
shell, and pebbles. PID = 0.5 ppm
NOTES:
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
SEDIMENT BORING HT18-14
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/29/2018 9:00:00 AM
DATE/TIME LOGGED 10/30/2018 8:50:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
DRILLING METHOD Vibracore
LOGGED BY E Cline
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
LATITUDE 42 21 250149
LONGITUDE 82 58 648377
ELEVATION 555.96 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 63.3 %
3g
id
<
>
cr
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
1
CL
<
cr
o
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
15.6
Composite
HT18-14-0010
SW-SM
WELL GRADED SAND WITH SILT: Black (10YR
2/1), f-vc sand, some silt, trace granules,
construction debris, and shell. PID = 2.4 ppm
7.2
Composite
HT18-14-1020
CL
SANDY LEAN CLAY: Very dark gray (10YR 3/1),
f-vc sandy clay, some silt, trace shell. PID = 0.5
mn
End of Boring at 3 ft.
NOTES:
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
SEDIMENT BORING HT18-15
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/24/2018 4:50:00 PM
DATE/TIME LOGGED 10/25/2018 10:10:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
DRILLING METHOD Vibracore
LOGGED BY E Cline
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
LATITUDE 42 21 211720
LONGITUDE 82° 58.731659
ELEVATION 556.1 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 101.5 %
3g
id
<
>
cr
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
1
CL
<
cr
o
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Composite
HT18-15-0005
SW-SC
30
Composite
HT18-15-0530
CH
WELL GRADED SAND WITH CLAY: Very dark
gray (2.5YR 3/1), f-c sand, some clay and oyster
shell. PID = 0.9ppm
FAT CLAY: Dark gray (2.5YR 4/1), fat clay, trace
granules and c. sand. PID = 0.5ppm
24
Composite
HT18-15-3050
CH
FAT CLAY: Dark gray (2.5YR 4/1), fat clay, trace
granules and c. sand. PID = 0.4ppm
CH
FAT CLAY: Dark gray (2.5YR 4/1), fat clay, trace
granules and c. sand. PID = 0.4ppm
End of Boring at 6.5 ft.
NOTES:
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
SEDIMENT BORING HT18-17
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/24/2018 3:00:00 PM
DATE/TIME LOGGED 10/25/2018 11:20:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
DRILLING METHOD Vibracore
LOGGED BY E Cline
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
LATITUDE 42 21 130291
LONGITUDE 82° 58.818345
ELEVATION 548.4 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 102.2 %
3g
id
<
>
cr
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
1
CL
<
cr
o
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
Composite
HT18-17-0010
CH
FAT CLAY WITH GRAVEL: Gray (2.5YR 5/1), fat
clay, trace c. sand and granules. Bed of clayey
gravel, some f-c sand at top 0.2 ft. PID = 0.7 ppm
24
Composite
HT18-17-1030
CH
FAT CLAY: Gray (2.5YR 5/1), fat clay, trace c.
sand and granules. PID = 0.5 ppm
20.4
Composite
HT18-17-3050
CH
FAT CLAY: Gray (2.5YR 5/1), fat clay, trace c.
sand and granules. PID = 0.5 ppm
End of Boring at 4.5 ft.
NOTES:
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
SEDIMENT BORING HT18-18
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/24/2018 11 45:00 AM
DATE/TIME LOGGED 10/25/2018 12:05:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
DRILLING METHOD Vibracore
LOGGED BY E Cline
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
LATITUDE 42 21 162420
LONGITUDE 82 58 895003
ELEVATION 560.5 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 90 %
3g
id
<
>
01
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
CD
O
_i
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
22.8
Composite
HT18-18-0020
ML-OL
SILT WITH SAND AND ORGANICS: Black (2.5Y
2.5/1), silt, some f-m sand, trace shell at top; bed
of organics in bottom 0.5 ft. Sheen and
hydrocarbon odor. PID = 8.2 ppm
10.8
Composite
HT18-18-2030
CL
LEAN CLAY: Gray (5YR 5/1), soft clay, trace c.
sand and granules. PID = 0.6 ppm
9.6
Composite
HT18-18-3035
SC
CLAYEY SAND: Dark gray (10YR 4/1), clayey
f-vc sand, trace shell, fining upward from granules
and pebbles. PID = 0.6 ppm
21.6
Composite
HT18-18-3550
CH
FAT CLAY: Gray (10YR 5/1), fat clay, trace m.
sand, granules, and angular pebbles. PID = 0.6
ppm
End of Boring at 6 ft.
NOTES:
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
SEDIMENT BORING HT18-19
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/24/2018 11:15:00 AM
DATE/TIME LOGGED 10/25/2018 2:35:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
DRILLING METHOD Vibracore
LOGGED BY E Cline
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
LATITUDE 42 21 145827
LONGITUDE 82 58 952226
ELEVATION 554.6 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 92.3 %
3g
id
<
>
cr
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
1
CL
<
cr
o
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
10.*
Composite
HT18-19-0010
OL
ORGANIC SILT WITH SAND: Black (10YR 2/1),
organic silt, some m. sand, trace angular pebbles.
Sheen and strong hydrocarbon odor. PID = 9.4
ppm
15.6
Composite
HT18-19-1020
ML
SILT: Very dark gray (10YR 3/1), silt, some f.
sand, numerous large shells. Sheen and strong
hydrocarbon odor. PID = 0.8 ppm
Composite
HT18-19-2030
SW
WELL GRADED SAND: Dark gray (10YR 4/1), f-c
sand, some shell, trace silt and pebbles. PID =
0.7 ppm
End of Boring at 3.3 ft.
NOTES:
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
E
38
jSSSSf* SEDIMENT BORING HT18-20
' Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
LOCATION Detroit, MI
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/24/2018 10:15:00 AM
LATITUDE 42° 21.111178
DATE/TIME LOGGED
10/25/2018 3:05:00 PM
LONGITUDE 82= 59.102033
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
ELEVATION 549.6 ft (NAVD 88)
DRILLING METHOD
Vibracore
(Sediment Surface)
LOGGED BY
E Cline
RECOVERY 92.3 %
g
LU 3
Q2
_i
<
>
cr
LU
i—
-Z.
LU „
—I (/)
CL d)
3 "
LU
CL
>-
I—
LU
_l
CL
<
CO
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
O
o
_l
0
1
CL
<
cr
o
CO
CO
<
_l
o
CO
o
CO
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
_c
"o.
(D
Q
POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT: Black
9.6
Composite
HT18-20-0010
SP-SM
(10YR 2/1), f-m sand, some silt, trace pebbles.
PID = 0.5 ppm
-
12
Composite
HT18-20-1020
CH
FAT CLAY: Greenish gray (10G 5/1), stiff, highly
plastic clay. PID = 0.4 ppm
1 a
2
POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT: Dark gray
(2.5Y 4/1), f. sand, some silt, trace clay, shell,
wood; cobbles at base. PID = 0.5 ppm
12
Composite
HT18-20-2030
SP-SM
? ft
3 -
End of Boring at 3.3 ft.
NOTES:
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate
/o recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
SEDIMENT BORING HT18-21
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/24/2018 9:30:00 AM
DATE/TIME LOGGED 10/25/2018 3:45:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
DRILLING METHOD Vibracore
LOGGED BY E Cline
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
LATITUDE 42 21 090310
LONGITUDE 82° 59.206108
ELEVATION 564.5 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 87.5 %
3g
id
<
>
cr
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
1
CL
<
cr
o
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
20.4
Composite
HT18-21-0015
SW-SM
WELL GRADED SAND WITH SILT AND
GRAVEL: Very dark grayish brown (2.5Y 3/2),
f-vc sand and gravel, some silt, trace shell,
pebbles, and construction debris (i.e. brick). PID
= 0.4 ppm
End of Boring at 2 ft.
NOTES:
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
SEDIMENT BORING HT18-23
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/23/2018 5:15:00 PM
DATE/TIME LOGGED 10/24/2018 10:15:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
DRILLING METHOD Vibracore
LOGGED BY E Cline
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
LATITUDE 42 21 066846
LONGITUDE 82 59 390311
ELEVATION 568.9 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 92 %
3g
id
<
>
01
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
CD
O
_i
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
Composite
HT18-23-0010
ML
SILT WITH SAND: Dark gray (10YR 4/1), silt,
some f. sand; bed of plant debris at top 0.3 ft. PID
= 0.6 ppm
24
Composite
HT18-23-1030
SP-SM
POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT: Dark gray
(10YR 4/1), f. sand, some silt, trace granules,
pebbles, and shell. PID = 0.2 ppm
24
Composite
HT18-23-3050
SP-SC
POORLY GRADED SAND WITH CLAY: Dark
gray (10YR 4/1), f. sand, some clay, trace silt;
interbeded with lean clay, some silt. PID = 2.9
ppm
24
Composite
HT18-23-5070
SP-SC
POORLY GRADED SAND WITH CLAY: Dark
gray (10YR 4/1), f. sand, some clay, trace silt;
interbeded with lean clay, some silt. PID = 0.3
ppm
26.4
Composite
HT18-23-7010
SP-SC
POORLY GRADED SAND WITH CLAY: Dark
gray (10YR 4/1), f. sand, some clay, trace silt;
increasingly interbeded with lean clay, some silt
with depth. PID = 0.3 ppm
NOTES:
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
SEDIMENT BORING HT18-24
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/23/2018 4:10:00 PM
DATE/TIME LOGGED 10/24/2018 11:40:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
DRILLING METHOD Vibracore
LOGGED BY E Cline
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
LATITUDE 42 21 036536
LONGITUDE 82 59 420921
ELEVATION 560.7 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 86.7 %
3g
id
<
>
01
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
CD
O
_i
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
Composite
HT18-24-0010
SP-SM
POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT: Dark gray
(10YR 4/1), vf-f sand, some silt, large cobble. PID
= 0.3 ppm
20.4
Composite
HT18-24-1025
SM
SILTY SAND: Dark gray (10YR 4/1), silty, f-m
sand; interbedded with silt, some clay. PID = 0.3
ppm
27.6
Composite
HT18-24-2550
CL
LEAN CLAY: Dark gray (10YR 4/1), low plasticity
clay, some silt, trace f. sand. PID = 0.3 ppm
19.2
Composite
HT18-24-5065
SP-SC
POORLY GRADED SAND WITH CLAY: Dark
gray (10YR 4/1), f. sand, some clay; trace shell,
granules, and pebbles. PID = 0.3 ppm
14.4
Composite
HT18-24-6575
CH
FAT CLAY: Dark gray (10YR 4/1), medium to
highly plastic clay, trace m. sand. PID = 0.3 ppm
End of Boring at 9 ft.
NOTES:
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
SEDIMENT BORING HT18-25
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/23/2018 3:00:00 PM
DATE/TIME LOGGED 10/24/2018 3:10:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
DRILLING METHOD Vibracore
LOGGED BY E Cline
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
LATITUDE 42 21 023073
LONGITUDE 82° 59.468149
ELEVATION 566.9 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 95 %
3g
id
<
>
01
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
CD
O
_i
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
Composite
HT18-25-0010
ML
SILT WITH SAND: Dark gray (10YR 4/1), silt,
some m. sand; thin bed of c. sand and pebbles,
some silt at 0.7-0.8 ft. PID = 3.6 ppm
24
Composite
HT18-25-1030
ML
SILT WITH SAND: Black (10YR 2/1), silt, some f.
sand, trace shell. Sheen and strong hydrocarbon
odor. PID = 7.2 ppm
14.4
Composite
HT18-25-3040
ML
SILT WITH SAND: Black (10YR 2/1), silt, some f.
sand, trace shell. Sheen and strong hydrocarbon
odor. PID = 2.3 ppm
33.6
Composite
HT18-25-4070
SP-SC
POORLY GRADED SAND WITH CLAY: Dark
gray (10YR 4/1), f-m sand, trace organics;
interbededded with lean clay, some silt. PID = 4.6
ppm
30
Composite
HT18-25-7010
SP-SC
POORLY GRADED SAND WITH CLAY: Dark
gray (10YR 4/1), f-m sand, trace organics;
interbededded with lean clay, some silt. PID = 3.7
ppm
NOTES:
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
E
38
jSSSSf* SEDIMENT BORING HT18-26
' Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
LOCATION Detroit, MI
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/23/2018 2:40:00 PM
LATITUDE 42° 20.976594
DATE/TIME LOGGED
10/24/2018 4:10:00 PM
LONGITUDE 82= 59.557515
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
ELEVATION 568.5 ft (NAVD 88)
DRILLING METHOD
Vibracore
(Sediment Surface)
LOGGED BY
E Cline
RECOVERY 95 %
g
LU 3
Q2
_i
<
>
cr
LU
i—
-Z.
LU „
—I (/)
CL d)
3 "
LU
CL
>-
I—
LU
_l
CL
<
CO
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
O
O
_i
0
1
CL
<
cr
o
CO
CO
<
_l
o
CO
o
CO
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
_c
"o.
(D
Q
12
Composite
HT18-26-0010
SP-SM
POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT: Dark gray
(10YR 4/1), f-m sand, some silt. PID = 2.4 ppm
24
Composite
HT18-26-1030
SP-SM
POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT: Dark gray
(10YR 4/1), f-m sand, some silt, trace shell and
pebbles, coarsening upward from f-m sand, some
clay. PID = 1.4 ppm
v//
24
Composite
HT18-26-3050
SP-SC
POORLY GRADED SAND WITH CLAY: Dark
gray (10YR 4/1), f-m sand, some silt; interbedded
with lean clay, some sand, trace shell. PID = 0.9
ppm
:¦$
24
Composite
HT18-26-5070
SP-SC
POORLY GRADED SAND WITH CLAY: Dark
gray (10YR 4/1), f-m sand, some silt; interbedded
with lean clay, some sand, trace shell and
organics. PID = 4.0 ppm
POORLY GRADED SAND WITH CLAY: Dark
30
Composite
HT18-26-7010
SP-SC
gray (10YR 4/1), f-m sand, some silt; interbedded
with lean clay, some sand, trace shell and
organics; increasing clay content with depth. PID
= 2.2 ppm
9 -
10 —
NOTES:
End of Boring at 10 ft.
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate %
recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
SEDIMENT BORING HT18-27
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/23/2018 9:45:00 AM
DATE/TIME LOGGED 10/24/2018 5:10:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
DRILLING METHOD Vibracore
LOGGED BY E Cline
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
LATITUDE 42° 20.879894
LONGITUDE 82 59 707928
ELEVATION 560.34 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 66.7 %
3g
id
<
>
cr
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
1
CL
<
cr
o
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
9.6
Composite
HT18-27-0010
13.2
Composite
HT18-27-1020
SP-SM
POORLY GRADED SAND WITH GRAVEL AND
SILT: Black (10YR 2/1), m. sand and gravel,
some silt, trace shell. Hydrocarbon odor. PID =
3.8 ppm
CH
FAT CLAY: Grayish brown (2.5YR 5/2), stiff, fat
clay, few angular pebbles (possibly slag). PID =
1.2 ppm
End of Boring at 3 ft.
NOTES:
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
SEDIMENT BORING HT18-29
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/22/2018 11 35:00 AM
DATE/TIME LOGGED 10/23/2018 12:00:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
DRILLING METHOD Vibracore
LOGGED BY E Cline
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
LATITUDE 42° 20.770424
LONGITUDE 82° 59.880960
ELEVATION 552 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 80 %
3g
id
<
>
01
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
CO
CO
o
o
<
_i
1
o
CL
CO
<
o
cr
CO
o
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
14.4
Composite
HT18-29-0010
SM
SILTY SAND: Dark gray (7.5YR 4/1), silty f-vc
sand, little angular granules gravel, and
construction debris (brick and concrete), trace
clay and shell. PID = 0.8ppm
End of Boring at 1.5 ft.
NOTES:
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
E
38
jSSSSf* SEDIMENT BORING HT18-30
' Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
LOCATION Detroit, MI
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/22/2018 9:55:00 AM
LATITUDE 42° 20.531980
DATE/TIME LOGGED
10/23/2018 10:35:00 AM
LONGITUDE 82= 59.984068
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
ELEVATION 563.98 ft (NAVD 88)
DRILLING METHOD
Vibracore
(Sediment Surface)
LOGGED BY
E Cline
RECOVERY 92 %
g
Sg
miu
LU 3
Q2
_i
<
>
cr
LU
i—
-Z.
LU „
—I (/)
CL d)
3 "
LU
CL
>-
I—
LU
_l
CL
<
CO
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
1
CL
<
cr
o
CO
CO
<
_l
o
CO
o
CO
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
_C
"o.
(D
Q
12
Composite
HT18-30-0010
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
2 -
24
Composite
HT18-30-1030
/
/
/
/
/
/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
4 -
24
Composite
HT18-30-3050
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
CL-ML
LEAN CLAY AND SILT: Dark greenish gray (5GY
3/1), silt, some soft clay, little fine sand; clay,
some silt, trace pebbles. Hydrocarbon odor. PID
= 6.3 ppm
/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
6 -
24
Composite
HT18-30-5070
/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
8 -
9 -
26.4
Composite
Archive
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
x/x
9 ?
10 —
NOTES:
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
SEDIMENT BORING HT18-31
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/23/2018 11 25:00 AM
DATE/TIME LOGGED 10/25/2018 8:30:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
DRILLING METHOD Vibracore
LOGGED BY E Cline
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
LATITUDE 42° 20.949171
LONGITUDE 82° 59.047716
ELEVATION ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 97.8 %
3g
id
<
>
01
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
CD
O
_i
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
15.6
Composite
HT18-31-0010
ML
SILT WITH SAND: Very dark gray (5Y 3/1), silt,
some f-c sand, trace roots, granules, and angular
pebbles; cobble at 1 -1.3 ft. PID = 0.9 ppm
15.6
Composite
HT18-31-1025
OL
ORGANIC SILT: Black (5Y 2.5/2), Organic silt
and peat, trace m. sand. PID = 0.9 ppm
37.2
Composite
HT18-31-2555
10.8
Composite
HT18-31-5565
SC-CL
SAND WITH CLAY: Greenish gray (10BG 5/1),
m. sand, some clay, fining upward to clay, some
m. sand at 3.2 ft. PID = 0.8 ppm
GW-GC
WELL GRADED GRAVEL WITH CLAY AND
SAND: Greenish gray (10BG 5/1), f-vc sandy
gravel, some clay, few angular pebbles. PID = 0.8
End of Boring at 6.8 ft.
NOTES:
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
SEDIMENT BORING HT18-32
PROJECT NAME Harbortown Upstream
DATE/TIME COLLECTED 10/23/2018 10:50:00 AM
DATE/TIME LOGGED 10/24/2018 6:00:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cetacean Marine
DRILLING METHOD Vibracore
LOGGED BY E Cline
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.36
LOCATION Detroit, MI
LATITUDE 42 20 712008
LONGITUDE 82° 59.1313
ELEVATION 565.65 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 100%
3g
id
<
>
cr
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR
GRAIN SIZE & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
1
CL
<
cr
o
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
3
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
Composite
HT18-32-0010
SW-SM
WELL GRADED SAND WITH SILT: Dark gray
(2.5YR 4/1), f-c sand, some silt, trace clay and
angular pebbles. PID = 1.9 ppm
24
Composite
HT18-32-1030
ML
SANDY SILT: Gray (2.5YR 5/1), f. sandy silt,
some clay, trace roots. PID = 1.6 ppm
36
Composite
HT18-32-3050
CL
LEAN CLAY: Gray (2.5YR 5/1), lean clay, some
silt, trace f. sand and roots. PID = 1.4 ppm
24
Composite
HT18-32-5070
CL
LEAN CLAY: Gray (2.5YR 5/1), lean clay, some
silt, trace f. sand and roots. PID = 1.4 ppm
End of Boring at 7 ft.
NOTES:
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX C:
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
HT16
T»*ne." CflM i
IpWvaU 0- 3
HT18-0I 3o(U|B
Time-", mo
;MW.34> ft
HT18-0I 3oOd|g
rime'. MHO
HT18-01-3060 HT18-01-6086
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-02
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
HT18-02-SURF HT18-02-0030
HT18-02-3060
HT 18-02-6093
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-03
HT18-03-3060
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-04
HT18-04-3044
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-05
HT18-05-3060
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-06
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
HT18-06-SURF HT18-06-0030
HT18-06-3060
HT 18-06-6097
HT|8-0
-------
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-07
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
HT18-06-SURF HT18-06-0030
HT18-06-3060
HT 18-06-6090
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-08
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-09
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
HT18-09-SURF HT18-09-0030
HT18-09-3060 HT18-09-6090
HT18-09-9010
T\mc
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-1G
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
HT18-10-SURF
HT18-10-0011
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-11
HT18-11-9010
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-12
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
HT18-12-SURF HT18-12-0030
HT18-12-9010
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-13
a
HT18-13-SURF HT18-13-0030
HT18-13-3060 HT18-13-6090
HT18-13-9010
1T-55
;-i ft
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-14
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
HT18-14-SURF
HT18-14-0019
Timr '. 065O
Ii\W. ¦jM".
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-15
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-16
No Core Taken from This
Location
HT18-16-SURF
HT18-16-0010
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-17
HT18-17-3050
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-18
HT18-18-3057
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-19
HT18-19-SURF HT18-19-003 3
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-20
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
HT18-20-SURF
HT18-20-0030
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-21
HT 18-21-SURF HT18-21-0017
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT23-18
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
HT 18-23-SURF HT18-23-0030
HT18-23-3060 HT18-23-6090
HT18-23-9010
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-24
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-25
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
HT18-25-SURF HT18-25-0030
HT18-25-3060 HT18-25-6090
HT18-25-9010
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-26
HT18-26-SURF HT18-26-0030
HT18-26-3060 HT18-26-6069
HT 18-26-9010
ht iR-jyo
Time! |tfi|D
rnV.w-r.O-?.
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-27
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-29
HT18-29-SURF HT18-29-0012
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-30
HT18-3 0-9010
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-31
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
HT 18-31-SURF HT18-31-0030
HT18-31-3060
HT 18-31-6067
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 6256136
June 2019
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT18-32
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
HT18-32-SURF HT18-32-0030
HT18-32-3050
HT18-32-6073
Harbortown Upstream Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Repot
-------
Appendix D
Particle Size Graphs
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received
Sample ID: HT18-09-SURF Percent Solids: 31.4% Start Date
Lab ID: 200-45876-E-1 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date
10/25/2018
10/29/2018
11/5/2018
Shape (> #10): na
Non-soil material: plant
Hardness (> #10): na
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
V
f
ai
0l
10000
1000 100
Particle Size, microns (um)
10
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
100.0
0.0
#20
850
98.4
1.6
#40
425
98.1
0.3
#60
250
97.9
0.2
#80
180
97.8
0.1
#100
150
97.5
0.3
#200
75
95.2
2.3
Hyd1
31.4
65.6
29.6
Hyd2
20.7
53.4
12.2
Hyd3
12.4
42.9
10.5
Hyd4
8.9
37.6
5.3
Hyd5
6.3
30.6
7.0
Hyd6
3.3
21.9
8.7
Hyd7
1.4
14.9
7.0
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
4.8
Coarse Sand
0.0
Medium Sand
1.9
Fine Sand
2.9
Silt
64.6
Clay
30.6
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
T eBfigftcS &cQ&j8K$Jfon
200-45876-E-1 11/5/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/25/2018
Sample ID: HT18-12-SURF-FD Percent Solids: 39.8% Start Date: 10/29/2018
Lab ID: 200-45876-E-2 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/5/2018
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
98.1
1.9
#20
850
97.2
0.9
#40
425
96.7
0.5
#60
250
95.8
0.9
#80
180
94.5
1.3
#100
150
92.7
1.8
#200
75
82.4
10.3
Hyd1
32.4
40.3
42.1
Hyd2
21.3
31.6
8.7
Hyd3
12.6
25.4
6.2
Hyd4
9.1
18.0
7.4
Hyd5
6.7
15.5
2.5
Hyd6
3.4
10.5
5.0
Hyd7
1.4
6.8
3.7
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
17.6
Coarse Sand
1.9
Medium Sand
1.4
Fine Sand
14.3
Silt
66.9
Clay
15.5
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
T QcOlf iBil^lbn
200-45876-E-2 11/5/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/25/2018
Sample ID: HT18-08-SURF Percent Solids: 30.3% Start Date: 10/30/2018
Lab ID: 200-45876-E-3 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/2/2018
Shape (> #10): na Non-soil material: plantg, shell
Hardness (> #10): na
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
99.1
0.9
#20
850
97.9
1.2
#40
425
97.3
0.6
#60
250
96.7
0.6
#80
180
96.1
0.6
#100
150
95.6
0.5
#200
75
92.0
3.6
Hyd1
32.6
48.6
43.4
Hyd2
20.8
45.6
3.0
Hyd3
12.3
39.4
6.2
Hyd4
8.9
31.7
7.7
Hyd5
6.5
25.5
6.2
Hyd6
3.2
19.3
6.2
Hyd7
1.4
13.1
6.2
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
8.0
Coarse Sand
0.9
Medium Sand
1.8
Fine Sand
5.3
Silt
66.5
Clay
25.5
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
T llicQf iSkiSton
200-45876-E-3 11/2/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/25/2018
Sample ID: HT18-10-SURF Percent Solids: 73.8% Start Date: 10/30/2018
Lab ID: 200-45876-E-4 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/2/2018
Shape (> #10): angular Non-soil material: plant, shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
91.3
8.7
#4
4750
90.9
0.4
#10
2000
90.5
0.4
#20
850
89.6
0.9
#40
425
81.7
7.9
#60
250
24.3
57.4
#80
180
10.8
13.5
#100
150
7.3
3.6
#200
75
4.2
3.0
Hyd1
36.5
4.4
-0.2
Hyd2
23.3
3.5
0.9
Hyd3
13.5
3.0
0.5
Hyd4
9.6
2.6
0.5
Hyd5
6.9
2.1
0.5
Hyd6
3.3
1.6
0.5
Hyd7
1.4
1.2
0.5
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
9.1
Sand
86.7
Coarse Sand
0.4
Medium Sand
CO
CO
Fine Sand
77.5
Silt
2.1
Clay
2.1
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
T eBSQftc? 2cfifi£i3£bn
200-45876-E-4 11/2/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/25/2018
Sample ID: HT18-11-SURF Percent Solids: 29.8% Start Date: 10/30/2018
Lab ID: 200-45876-E-5 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/2/2018
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
99.4
0.6
#20
850
97.0
2.4
#40
425
96.4
0.6
#60
250
95.6
0.8
#80
180
94.7
0.9
#100
150
93.6
1.1
#200
75
88.8
4.8
Hyd1
31.6
57.8
31.0
Hyd2
20.6
49.9
7.9
Hyd3
12.4
38.8
11.1
Hyd4
9
34.1
4.7
Hyd5
6.5
27.7
6.4
Hyd6
3.2
19.8
7.9
Hyd7
1.4
13.5
6.3
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
11.2
Coarse Sand
0.6
Medium Sand
3.0
Fine Sand
7.6
Silt
61.1
Clay
27.7
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
200-45876-E-5 11/2/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/25/2018
Sample ID: HT18-12-SURF Percent Solids: 37.1% Start Date: 10/30/2018
Lab ID: 200-45876-E-6 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/2/2018
Shape (> #10): angular Non-soil material: plant
Hardness (> #10): hard
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
99.3
0.7
#20
850
98.4
0.9
#40
425
97.7
0.7
#60
250
95.2
2.5
#80
180
93.6
1.6
#100
150
92.0
1.6
#200
75
81.2
10.8
Hyd1
31
45.1
36.1
Hyd2
20.4
38.3
6.8
Hyd3
12.4
28.0
10.3
Hyd4
9.1
22.3
5.7
Hyd5
6.4
16.6
5.7
Hyd6
3.3
10.9
5.7
Hyd7
1.4
8.6
2.3
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
18.8
Coarse Sand
0.7
Medium Sand
1.6
Fine Sand
16.5
Silt
64.6
Clay
16.6
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
T eBSQftc? 4v:0£j8K$Jfc>n
200-45876-E-6 11/2/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/25/2018
Sample ID: HT18-31-SURF Percent Solids: 37.1% Start Date: 10/30/2018
Lab ID: 200-45876-E-7 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/2/2018
Shape (> #10): na Non-soil material: plant, shell
Hardness (> #10): na
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
98.8
1.2
#20
850
98.1
0.7
#40
425
97.6
0.5
#60
250
96.5
1.1
#80
180
95.5
1.0
#100
150
94.9
0.6
#200
75
92.1
2.8
Hyd1
27.5
70.8
21.3
Hyd2
18.6
59.5
11.3
Hyd3
11.5
45.7
13.8
Hyd4
8.3
38.2
7.5
Hyd5
6.2
31.9
6.3
Hyd6
3.2
23.2
8.7
Hyd7
1.3
15.7
7.5
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
7.9
Coarse Sand
1.2
Medium Sand
1.2
Fine Sand
5.5
Silt
60.2
Clay
31.9
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
T 6c0lf
200-45876-E-7 11/2/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/25/2018
Sample ID: HT18-32-SURF Percent Solids: 49.0% Start Date: 10/30/2018
Lab ID: 200-45876-E-8 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/2/2018
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
98.5
1.5
#10
2000
97.7
0.8
#20
850
96.5
1.2
#40
425
95.8
0.7
#60
250
93.2
2.6
#80
180
91.6
1.6
#100
150
90.5
1.1
#200
75
82.8
7.7
Hyd1
27.2
58.2
24.6
Hyd2
18.6
48.0
10.2
Hyd3
11.5
36.9
11.1
Hyd4
8.5
26.8
10.1
Hyd5
6.3
21.7
5.1
Hyd6
3.3
15.7
6.0
Hyd7
1.4
10.6
5.1
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
1.5
Sand
15.7
Coarse Sand
0.8
Medium Sand
1.9
Fine Sand
13.0
Silt
61.1
Clay
21.7
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
T eBfigftc? &cQ&j8K$Jfon
200-45876-E-8 11/2/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/25/2018
Sample ID: HT18-29-SURF Percent Solids: 81.2% Start Date: 10/30/2018
Lab ID: 200-45876-E-9 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/2/2018
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
85.9
14.1
#4
4750
58.4
27.5
#10
2000
41.3
17.1
#20
850
36.8
4.5
#40
425
30.6
6.2
#60
250
21.1
9.5
#80
180
17.0
4.1
#100
150
15.8
1.2
#200
75
14.5
1.3
Hyd1
37.3
1.9
12.6
Hyd2
23.7
1.5
0.4
Hyd3
13.7
1.5
0.0
Hyd4
9.5
1.5
0.0
Hyd5
6.9
1.1
0.4
Hyd6
3.3
0.6
0.4
Hyd7
1.4
0.2
0.4
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
41.6
Sand
43.9
Coarse Sand
17.1
Medium Sand
10.7
Fine Sand
16.1
Silt
13.4
Clay
1.1
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
T eBfigftc? 7>cQ£j8K$Jfc>n
200-45876-E-9 11/2/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/25/2018
Sample ID: HT18-30-SURF Percent Solids: 38.2% Start Date: 10/30/2018
Lab ID: 20Q-45876-E-10 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/2/2018
Shape (> #10): angular Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
98.9
1.1
#20
850
98.4
0.5
#40
425
98.0
0.4
#60
250
96.4
1.6
#80
180
95.8
0.6
#100
150
95.4
0.4
#200
75
91.7
3.7
Hyd1
28.3
67.9
23.8
Hyd2
18.7
60.1
7.8
Hyd3
11.1
55.0
5.1
Hyd4
8
45.9
9.1
Hyd5
5.9
42.0
3.9
Hyd6
3
31.7
10.3
Hyd7
1.3
21.3
10.4
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
8.3
Coarse Sand
1.1
Medium Sand
0.9
Fine Sand
6.3
Silt
49.7
Clay
42.0
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
T ScOlf iBil^lbn
20O-45876-E-10 11/2/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/25/2018
Sample ID: HT18-32-SURF-FD Percent Solids: 47.9% Start Date: 10/30/2018
Lab ID: 200-45876-E-11 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/5/2018
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
99.2
0.8
#20
850
98.1
1.1
#40
425
97.6
0.5
#60
250
96.2
1.4
#80
180
94.6
1.6
#100
150
93.3
1.3
#200
75
85.0
8.3
Hyd1
28.6
55.2
29.8
Hyd2
18.9
48.8
6.4
Hyd3
11.5
39.1
9.7
Hyd4
8.5
31.6
7.5
Hyd5
6.3
23.1
8.5
Hyd6
3.1
16.6
6.5
Hyd7
1.3
12.3
4.3
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
15.0
Coarse Sand
0.8
Medium Sand
1.6
Fine Sand
12.6
Silt
61.9
Clay
23.1
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
TdaasiiiciadOifuSia^n
200-45876-E-11 11/5/2018
1 of 1
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/25/2018
Client Sample ID
HT18-09-SURF
Start Date
10/29/2018 19:40
Lab Sample ID
200-45876-E-1
End Date
11/05/2018 14:28
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant
Tin Weight
1.07 g
Shape (>#10):
na
Wet Sample + Tin
18.13 g
Hardness (> #10):
na
Dry Sample + Tin
6.42 g
% Moisture
68.64 %
Date/Time in oven
10/29/2018 19:44
Date/Time out of oven
10/30/2018 16:57
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.09 190.52
146.43
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
45.9
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
0.02
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
45.9
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
31.3
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
462.69
462.71
0.02 g
100.0 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
378.86
379.61
0.75 g
98.4 Sand
Medium
#40
425
353.20
353.36
0.16 g
98.1 Sand
Medium
#60
250
348.61
348.69
0.08 g
97.9 Sand
Fine
#80
180
338.06
338.12
0.06 g
97.8 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.67
328.80
0.13 g
97.5 Sand
Fine
#200
75
325.49
326.53
1.04 g
95.2 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
95.2
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
45.9
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0215
20.0
31.4
65.6 Silt
5
5
1.0180
20.0
20.7
53.4 Silt
15
15
1.0150
20.0
12.4
42.9 Silt
30
30
1.0135
20.0
8.9
37.6 Silt
60
63
1.0115
20.0
6.3
30.6 Silt
250
241
1.0090
20.0
3.3
21.9 Clay
1440
1388
1.0070
20.0
1.4
14.9 Clay
Page 80 of 836
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/25/2018
Client Sample ID
HT18-12-SURF-FD
Start Date
10/29/2018 19:46
Lab Sample ID
200-45876-E-2
End Date
11/05/2018 14:31
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant
Tin Weight
1.09 g
Shape (>#10):
angular
Wet Sample + Tin
20.70 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
8.89 g
% Moisture
60.22 %
Date/Time in oven
10/29/2018 19:48
Date/Time out of oven
10/30/2018 16:58
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.08 206.76
162.68
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
64.7
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
1.21
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
63.5
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
39
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
462.69
463.90
1.21 g
98.1 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
374.56
375.15
0.59 g
97.2 Sand
Medium
#40
425
363.31
363.61
0.30 g
96.7 Sand
Medium
#60
250
353.69
354.25
0.56 g
95.8 Sand
Fine
#80
180
319.37
320.21
0.84 g
94.5 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.79
329.93
1.14 g
92.7 Sand
Fine
#200
75
314.60
321.25
6.65 g
82.4 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
82.4
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
64.7
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0190
20.0
32.4
40.3 Silt
5
5
1.0155
20.0
21.3
31.6 Silt
15
15
1.0130
20.0
12.6
25.4 Silt
30
31
1.0100
20.0
9.1
18 Silt
60
57
1.0090
20.0
6.7
15.5 Silt
250
235
1.0070
20.0
3.4
10.5 Clay
1440
1382
1.0055
20.0
1.4
6.83 Clay
Page 81 of 836
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/25/2018
Client Sample ID
HT18-08-SURF
Start Date
10/30/2018 18:18
Lab Sample ID
200-45876-E-3
End Date
11/02/2018 11:13
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plantg, shell
Tin Weight
1.04 g
Shape (>#10):
na
Wet Sample + Tin
17.23 g
Hardness (> #10):
na
Dry Sample + Tin
5.94 g
% Moisture
69.73 %
Date/Time in oven
10/30/2018 18:20
Date/Time out of oven
10/31/2018 19:27
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.77 216.53
171.76
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
52
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
0.49
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
51.5
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
30
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
462.68
463.17
0.49 g
99.1 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
378.85
379.47
0.62 g
97.9 Sand
Medium
#40
425
353.22
353.54
0.32 g
97.3 Sand
Medium
#60
250
348.46
348.75
0.29 g
96.7 Sand
Fine
#80
180
337.94
338.26
0.32 g
96.1 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.66
328.94
0.28 g
95.6 Sand
Fine
#200
75
325.49
327.36
1.87 g
92.0 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
92.0
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
52
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0185
20.0
32.6
48.6 Silt
5
5
1.0175
20.0
20.8
45.6 Silt
15
15
1.0155
20.0
12.3
39.4 Silt
30
30
1.0130
20.0
8.9
31.7 Silt
60
59
1.0110
20.0
6.5
25.5 Silt
250
256
1.0090
20.0
3.2
19.3 Clay
1440
1440
1.0070
20.0
1.4
13.1 Clay
Page 82 of 836
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/25/2018
Client Sample ID
HT18-10-SURF
Start Date
10/30/2018 18:22
Lab Sample ID
200-45876-E-4
End Date
11/02/2018 11:18
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant, shell
Tin Weight
1.05 g
Shape (>#10):
angular
Wet Sample + Tin
40.33 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
30.02 g
% Moisture
26.25 %
Date/Time in oven
10/30/2018 18:24
Date/Time out of oven
10/31/2018 19:27
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.09 278.98
234.89
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
173
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
16.5
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
157
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
66.8
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
447.24
462.35
15.11 g
91.3 Gravel
#4
4750
488.03
488.73
0.70 g
90.9 Gravel
#10
2000
462.68
463.40
0.72 g
90.5 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
374.58
376.10
1.52 g
89.6 Sand
Medium
#40
425
363.37
377.07
13.70 g
81.7 Sand
Medium
#60
250
353.50
452.79
99.29 g
24.3 Sand
Fine
#80
180
319.40
342.83
23.43 g
10.8 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.63
334.78
6.15 g
7.3 Sand
Fine
#200
75
314.60
319.81
5.21 g
4.2 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
4.2
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
173
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0075
20.0
36.5
4.41 Silt
5
5
1.0065
20.0
23.3
3.48 Silt
15
15
1.0060
20.0
13.5
3.02 Silt
30
30
1.0055
20.0
9.6
2.55 Silt
60
58
1.0050
20.0
6.9
2.09 Silt
250
256
1.0045
20.0
3.3
1.62 Clay
1440
1440
1.0040
20.0
1.4
1.16 Clay
Page 83 of 836
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/25/2018
Client Sample ID
HT18-11-SURF
Start Date
10/30/2018 18:27
Lab Sample ID
200-45876-E-5
End Date
11/02/2018 11:26
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant, shell
Tin Weight
1.04 g
Shape (>#10):
na
Wet Sample + Tin
19.89 g
Hardness (> #10):
na
Dry Sample + Tin
6.66 g
% Moisture
70.19 %
Date/Time in oven
10/30/2018 18:28
Date/Time out of oven
10/31/2018 19:28
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.09 214.03
169.94
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
50.7
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
0.29
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
50.4
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
29.7
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
462.68
462.97
0.29 g
99.4 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
378.85
380.07
1.22 g
97.0 Sand
Medium
#40
425
353.22
353.52
0.30 g
96.4 Sand
Medium
#60
250
348.46
348.86
0.40 g
95.6 Sand
Fine
#80
180
337.94
338.39
0.45 g
94.7 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.66
329.20
0.54 g
93.6 Sand
Fine
#200
75
325.49
327.93
2.44 g
88.8 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
88.8
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
50.7
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0210
20.0
31.6
57.8 Silt
5
5
1.0185
20.0
20.6
49.9 Silt
15
15
1.0150
20.0
12.4
38.8 Silt
30
29
1.0135
20.0
9
34.1 Silt
60
58
1.0115
20.0
6.5
27.7 Silt
250
250
1.0090
20.0
3.2
19.8 Clay
1440
1434
1.0070
20.0
1.4
13.5 Clay
Page 84 of 836
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/25/2018
Client Sample ID
HT18-12-SURF
Start Date
10/30/2018 18:31
Lab Sample ID
200-45876-E-6
End Date
11/02/2018 12:11
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant
Tin Weight
1.05 g
Shape (>#10):
angular
Wet Sample + Tin
16.33 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
6.72 g
% Moisture
62.89 %
Date/Time in oven
10/30/2018 18:33
Date/Time out of oven
10/31/2018 19:28
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.18 233.57
189.39
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
70.3
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
0.51
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
69.8
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
36.9
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
462.68
463.19
0.51 g
99.3 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
374.58
375.20
0.62 g
98.4 Sand
Medium
#40
425
363.37
363.88
0.51 g
97.7 Sand
Medium
#60
250
353.50
355.28
1.78 g
95.2 Sand
Fine
#80
180
319.40
320.55
1.15 g
93.6 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.63
329.75
1.12 g
92.0 Sand
Fine
#200
75
314.60
322.20
7.60 g
81.2 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
81.2
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
70.3
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0225
20.0
31
45.1 Silt
5
5
1.0195
20.0
20.4
38.3 Silt
15
15
1.0150
20.0
12.4
28 Silt
30
29
1.0125
20.0
9.1
22.3 Silt
60
63
1.0100
20.0
6.4
16.6 Silt
250
250
1.0075
20.0
3.3
10.9 Clay
1440
1434
1.0065
20.0
1.4
8.57 Clay
Page 85 of 836
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/25/2018
Client Sample ID
HT18-31-SURF
Start Date
10/30/2018 18:36
Lab Sample ID
200-45876-E-7
End Date
11/02/2018 12:17
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant, shell
Tin Weight
1.05 g
Shape (>#10):
na
Wet Sample + Tin
22.36 g
Hardness (> #10):
na
Dry Sample + Tin
8.96 g
% Moisture
62.88 %
Date/Time in oven
10/30/2018 18:38
Date/Time out of oven
10/31/2018 19:28
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.12 216.85
172.73
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
64.1
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
0.74
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
63.4
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
36.7
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
462.68
463.42
0.74 g
98.8 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
378.85
379.31
0.46 g
98.1 Sand
Medium
#40
425
353.22
353.56
0.34 g
97.6 Sand
Medium
#60
250
348.46
349.17
0.71 g
96.5 Sand
Fine
#80
180
337.94
338.60
0.66 g
95.5 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.66
329.07
0.41 g
94.9 Sand
Fine
#200
75
325.49
327.30
1.81 g
92.1 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
92.1
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
64.1
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0310
20.0
27.5
70.8 Silt
5
5
1.0265
20.0
18.6
59.5 Silt
15
15
1.0210
20.0
11.5
45.7 Silt
30
31
1.0180
20.0
8.3
38.2 Silt
60
60
1.0155
20.0
6.2
31.9 Silt
250
240
1.0120
20.0
3.2
23.2 Clay
1440
1424
1.0090
20.0
1.3
15.7 Clay
Page 86 of 836
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/25/2018
Client Sample ID
HT18-32-SURF
Start Date
10/30/2018 18:42
Lab Sample ID
200-45876-E-8
End Date
11/02/2018 12:22
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
shell
Tin Weight
1.05 g
Shape (>#10):
subangular
Wet Sample + Tin
18.67 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
9.68 g
% Moisture
51.02 %
Date/Time in oven
10/30/2018 18:43
Date/Time out of oven
10/31/2018 19:29
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.75 206.81
162.06
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
79.4
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
1.79
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
77.6
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
47.9
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
488.03
489.19
1.16 g
98.5 Gravel
#10
2000
462.68
463.31
0.63 g
97.7 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
374.58
375.55
0.97 g
96.5 Sand
Medium
#40
425
363.37
363.95
0.58 g
95.8 Sand
Medium
#60
250
353.50
355.58
2.08 g
93.2 Sand
Fine
#80
180
319.40
320.66
1.26 g
91.6 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.63
329.50
0.87 g
90.5 Sand
Fine
#200
75
314.60
320.72
6.12 g
82.8 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
82.8
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
79.4
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0315
20.0
27.2
58.2 Silt
5
5
1.0265
20.0
18.6
48 Silt
15
15
1.0210
20.0
11.5
36.9 Silt
30
31
1.0160
20.0
8.5
26.8 Silt
60
59
1.0135
20.0
6.3
21.7 Silt
250
234
1.0105
20.0
3.3
15.7 Clay
1440
1418
1.0080
20.0
1.4
10.6 Clay
Page 87 of 836
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/25/2018
Client Sample ID
HT18-29-SURF
Start Date
10/30/2018 18:46
Lab Sample ID
200-45876-E-9
End Date
11/02/2018 12:29
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
shell
Tin Weight
1.05 g
Shape (>#10):
angular
Wet Sample + Tin
31.61 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
25.86 g
% Moisture
18.82 %
Date/Time in oven
10/30/2018 18:47
Date/Time out of oven
10/31/2018 19:29
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.77 277.82
233.05
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
189
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
111
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
78
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
33.5
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
447.24
473.91
26.67 g
85.9 Gravel
#4
4750
488.03
540.02
51.99 g
58.4 Gravel
#10
2000
462.68
494.91
32.23 g
41.3 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
378.85
387.39
8.54 g
36.8 Sand
Medium
#40
425
353.22
364.93
11.71 g
30.6 Sand
Medium
#60
250
348.46
366.34
17.88 g
21.1 Sand
Fine
#80
180
337.94
345.66
7.72 g
17.0 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.66
331.00
2.34 g
15.8 Sand
Fine
#200
75
325.49
327.93
2.44 g
14.5 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
14.5
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
189
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) °/
'o Finer Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0050
20.0
37.3
1.91 Silt
5
5
1.0045
20.0
23.7
1.49 Silt
15
15
1.0045
20.0
13.7
1.49 Silt
30
31
1.0045
20.0
9.5
1.49 Silt
60
59
1.0040
20.0
6.9
1.06 Silt
250
265
1.0035
20.0
3.3
0.637 Clay
1440
1412
1.0030
20.0
1.4
0.212 Clay
Page 88 of 836
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/25/2018
Client Sample ID
HT18-30-SURF
Start Date
10/30/2018 18:50
Lab Sample ID
200-45876-E-10
End Date
11/02/2018 12:33
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
shell
Tin Weight
1.03 g
Shape (>#10):
angular
Wet Sample + Tin
21.82 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
8.97 g
% Moisture
61.81 %
Date/Time in oven
10/30/2018 18:52
Date/Time out of oven
10/31/2018 19:29
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.76 207.49
162.73
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
62.1
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
0.67
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
61.4
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
37.7
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
462.68
463.35
0.67 g
98.9 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
374.58
374.87
0.29 g
98.4 Sand
Medium
#40
425
363.37
363.62
0.25 g
98.0 Sand
Medium
#60
250
353.50
354.47
0.97 g
96.4 Sand
Fine
#80
180
319.40
319.75
0.35 g
95.8 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.63
328.89
0.26 g
95.4 Sand
Fine
#200
75
314.60
316.87
2.27 g
91.7 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
91.7
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
62.1
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0290
20.0
28.3
67.9 Silt
5
5
1.0260
20.0
18.7
60.1 Silt
15
15
1.0240
20.0
11.1
55 Silt
30
32
1.0205
20.0
8
45.9 Silt
60
60
1.0190
20.0
5.9
42 Silt
250
259
1.0150
20.0
3
31.7 Clay
1440
1406
1.0110
20.0
1.3
21.3 Clay
Page 89 of 836
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/25/2018
Client Sample ID
HT18-32-S U R F-FD
Start Date
10/30/2018 19:45
Lab Sample ID
200-45876-E-11
End Date
11/05/2018 11:52
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant, shell
Tin Weight
1.03 g
Shape (>#10):
na
Wet Sample + Tin
19.40 g
Hardness (> #10):
na
Dry Sample + Tin
9.82 g
% Moisture
52.15 %
Date/Time in oven
10/30/2018 19:47
Date/Time out of oven
10/31/2018 19:39
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.06 200.67
156.61
Serial Number
542318
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
74.9
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
0.62
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
74.3
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
47.4
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
462.69
463.31
0.62 g
99.2 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
378.86
379.67
0.81 g
98.1 Sand
Medium
#40
425
353.20
353.61
0.41 g
97.6 Sand
Medium
#60
250
348.61
349.66
1.05 g
96.2 Sand
Fine
#80
180
338.06
339.28
1.22 g
94.6 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.67
329.63
0.96 g
93.3 Sand
Fine
#200
75
325.49
331.72
6.23 g
85.0 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
85.0
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
74.9
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0285
20.0
28.6
55.2 Silt
5
5
1.0255
20.0
18.9
48.8 Silt
15
15
1.0210
20.0
11.5
39.1 Silt
30
30
1.0175
20.0
8.5
31.6 Silt
60
59
1.0135
20.0
6.3
23.1 Silt
250
256
1.0105
20.0
3.1
16.6 Clay
1440
1440
1.0085
20.0
1.3
12.3 Clay
Page 90 of 836
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/26/2018
Sample ID: HT18-25-SURF Percent Solids: 34.4% Start Date: 11/2/2018
Lab ID: 200-45893-E-1 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/8/2018
Shape (> #10): na Non-soil material: plant
Hardness (> #10): na
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
99.3
0.7
#20
850
97.6
1.7
#40
425
96.9
0.7
#60
250
94.8
2.1
#80
180
92.3
2.5
#100
150
90.4
1.9
#200
75
82.0
8.4
Hyd1
32.6
43.6
38.4
Hyd2
21
39.5
4.1
Hyd3
12.4
33.9
5.6
Hyd4
8.9
29.8
4.1
Hyd5
6.3
24.2
5.6
Hyd6
3.3
18.7
5.5
Hyd7
1.4
11.8
6.9
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
18.0
Coarse Sand
0.7
Medium Sand
2.4
Fine Sand
14.9
Silt
57.8
Clay
24.2
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
TR8@6riZ2n0feilr4r§tln
200-45893-E-1 11/8/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/26/2018
Sample ID: HT18-23-SURF Percent Solids: 34.2% Start Date: 11/2/2018
Lab ID: 200-45893-E-2 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/8/2018
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
99.3
0.7
#20
850
98.9
0.4
#40
425
98.8
0.1
#60
250
98.7
0.1
#80
180
98.3
0.4
#100
150
97.9
0.4
#200
75
93.4
4.5
Hyd1
31.6
52.0
41.4
Hyd2
20.6
44.9
7.1
Hyd3
12.1
40.6
4.3
Hyd4
8.6
34.9
5.7
Hyd5
6.5
26.3
8.6
Hyd6
3.3
19.2
7.1
Hyd7
1.4
12.1
7.1
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
6.6
Coarse Sand
0.7
Medium Sand
0.5
Fine Sand
5.4
Silt
67.1
Clay
26.3
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
TR8@6ri£3n0feilr4r§tln
200-45893-E-2 11/8/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/26/2018
Sample ID: HT18-24-SURF Percent Solids: 49.5% Start Date: 11/4/2018
Lab ID: 200-45893-E-3 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/9/2018
Shape (> #10): subangular Non-soil material: plant, shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
94.4
5.6
#4
4750
91.6
2.8
#10
2000
88.8
2.8
#20
850
87.0
1.8
#40
425
84.6
2.4
#60
250
77.2
7.4
#80
180
60.1
17.1
#100
150
48.8
11.3
#200
75
35.4
13.4
Hyd1
34.6
14.7
20.7
Hyd2
22
14.0
0.7
Hyd3
12.8
12.5
1.5
Hyd4
9.3
9.7
2.8
Hyd5
6.7
8.3
1.4
Hyd6
3.2
6.1
2.2
Hyd7
1.4
3.9
2.2
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
8.4
Sand
56.2
Coarse Sand
2.8
Medium Sand
4.2
Fine Sand
49.2
Silt
27.2
Clay
8.3
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
TR8@6riZ4n0feilr4r§tln
200-45893-E-3 11/9/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/26/2018
Sample ID: HT18-26-SURF Percent Solids: 54.6% Start Date: 11/4/2018
Lab ID: 200-45893-E-4 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/9/2018
Shape (> #10): na Non-soil material: plant, shell
Hardness (> #10): na
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
99.1
0.9
#10
2000
98.4
0.7
#20
850
97.6
0.8
#40
425
97.0
0.6
#60
250
94.4
2.6
#80
180
88.5
5.9
#100
150
81.1
7.4
#200
75
35.2
45.9
Hyd1
34.4
14.9
20.3
Hyd2
22
13.5
1.4
Hyd3
13
10.7
2.8
Hyd4
9.3
8.7
2.1
Hyd5
6.8
6.6
2.1
Hyd6
3.3
5.2
1.4
Hyd7
1.4
3.1
2.1
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.9
Sand
63.9
Coarse Sand
0.7
Medium Sand
1.4
Fine Sand
61.8
Silt
28.6
Clay
6.6
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
TR8@6riS5n0feilr4r§tln
200-45893-E-4 11/9/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/26/2018
Sample ID: HT18-18-SURF Percent Solids: 40.8% Start Date: 11/4/2018
Lab ID: 200-45893-E-5 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/9/2018
Shape (> #10): subangular Non-soil material: plant, shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
99.2
0.8
#10
2000
98.3
0.9
#20
850
96.2
2.1
#40
425
95.4
0.8
#60
250
92.8
2.6
#80
180
86.1
6.7
#100
150
79.4
6.7
#200
75
66.4
13.0
Hyd1
32.4
32.3
34.1
Hyd2
20.8
29.4
2.9
Hyd3
12.3
25.4
4.0
Hyd4
9.1
20.4
5.0
Hyd5
6.6
15.4
5.0
Hyd6
3.2
11.4
4.0
Hyd7
1.4
7.5
3.9
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.8
Sand
32.8
Coarse Sand
0.9
Medium Sand
2.9
Fine Sand
29.0
Silt
51.0
Clay
15.4
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
TR8@6riZfin0feLlr4r§tln
200-45893-E-5 11/9/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/26/2018
Sample ID: HT18-19-SURF Percent Solids: 69.3% Start Date: 11/4/2018
Lab ID: 200-45893-E-6 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/9/2018
Shape (> #10): subangular Non-soil material: plant, shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
99.1
0.9
#4
4750
93.5
5.6
#10
2000
86.8
6.7
#20
850
83.4
3.4
#40
425
78.9
4.5
#60
250
66.8
12.1
#80
180
50.2
16.6
#100
150
34.2
16.0
#200
75
13.5
20.7
Hyd1
35.3
9.5
4.0
Hyd2
22.6
8.4
1.2
Hyd3
13.1
7.2
1.2
Hyd4
9.6
5.5
1.7
Hyd5
6.6
4.3
1.2
Hyd6
3.3
3.2
1.1
Hyd7
1.4
2.0
1.2
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
6.5
Sand
80.0
Coarse Sand
6.7
Medium Sand
7.9
Fine Sand
65.4
Silt
9.2
Clay
4.3
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
TR8@6ri£7n0feilr4r§tln
200-45893-E-6 11/9/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/26/2018
Sample ID: HT18-20-SURF Percent Solids: 49.2% Start Date: 11/4/2018
Lab ID: 200-45893-E-7 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/9/2018
Shape (> #10): na Non-soil material: shell, plant
Hardness (> #10): na
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
89.7
10.3
#4
4750
80.7
9.0
#10
2000
79.0
1.7
#20
850
77.9
1.1
#40
425
76.9
1.0
#60
250
74.6
2.3
#80
180
68.8
5.8
#100
150
59.8
9.0
#200
75
31.3
28.5
Hyd1
32.6
25.0
6.3
Hyd2
21.3
20.3
4.7
Hyd3
12.6
17.1
3.2
Hyd4
8.9
13.9
3.2
Hyd5
6.5
10.7
3.2
Hyd6
3.3
9.1
1.6
Hyd7
1.4
6.0
3.2
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
19.3
Sand
49.4
Coarse Sand
1.7
Medium Sand
2.1
Fine Sand
45.6
Silt
20.6
Clay
10.7
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
TR8@6riS3n0feilr4r§tln
200-45893-E-7 11/9/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/26/2018
Sample ID: HT18-21-SURF Percent Solids: 76.4% Start Date: 11/4/2018
Lab ID: 200-45893-E-8 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/9/2018
Shape (> #10): subangular Non-soil material: shell, plant, glass
Hardness (> #10): hard
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
74.8
25.2
3/8 inch
9500
58.7
16.1
#4
4750
44.3
14.4
#10
2000
31.8
12.5
#20
850
27.2
4.6
#40
425
21.9
5.3
#60
250
17.3
4.6
#80
180
15.5
1.8
#100
150
14.3
1.2
#200
75
12.3
2.0
Hyd1
36.3
4.5
7.8
Hyd2
23.2
3.6
0.9
Hyd3
13.5
3.2
0.4
Hyd4
9.4
2.4
0.9
Hyd5
6.9
1.9
0.4
Hyd6
3.5
1.5
0.4
Hyd7
1.4
0.6
0.9
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
55.7
Sand
32.0
Coarse Sand
12.5
Medium Sand
9.9
Fine Sand
9.6
Silt
10.4
Clay
1.9
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
TR8@6riS)n0feilr4r§tln
200-45893-E-8
11/9/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/26/2018
Sample ID: HT18-15-SURF Percent Solids: 53.4% Start Date: 11/4/2018
Lab ID: 200-45893-E-9 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/9/2018
Shape (> #10): na Non-soil material: shell, plant
Hardness (> #10): na
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
91.3
8.7
#4
4750
83.1
8.2
#10
2000
76.1
7.0
#20
850
72.7
3.4
#40
425
67.5
5.2
#60
250
50.5
17.0
#80
180
37.1
13.4
#100
150
29.5
7.6
#200
75
13.2
16.3
Hyd1
34.6
12.1
1.1
Hyd2
22.2
10.3
1.8
Hyd3
13
8.6
1.7
Hyd4
9.1
7.4
1.2
Hyd5
6.7
6.2
1.2
Hyd6
3.2
4.4
1.8
Hyd7
1.4
3.3
1.2
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
16.9
Sand
69.9
Coarse Sand
7.0
Medium Sand
8.6
Fine Sand
54.3
Silt
7.0
Clay
6.2
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
Tf!8@6riiiyDn0feLlr4r§tln
200-45893-E-9 11/9/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/26/2018
Sample ID: HT18-16-SURF Percent Solids: 42.0% Start Date: 11/4/2018
Lab ID: 20Q-45893-E-10 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/9/2018
Shape (> #10): subangular Non-soil material: plant, shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
94.1
5.9
#20
850
88.8
5.3
#40
425
82.4
6.4
#60
250
73.1
9.3
#80
180
68.9
4.2
#100
150
67.5
1.4
#200
75
65.6
1.9
Hyd1
33.2
21.4
44.2
Hyd2
22.2
13.1
8.3
Hyd3
13
11.6
1.5
Hyd4
9
8.6
3.0
Hyd5
6.7
7.1
1.5
Hyd6
3.3
4.9
2.3
Hyd7
1.4
3.4
1.5
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
34.4
Coarse Sand
5.9
Medium Sand
11.7
Fine Sand
16.8
Silt
58.5
Clay
7.1
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
lR8@6ri&i'ln0feLlr4r§tln
200-45893-E-10 11/9/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/26/2018
Sample ID: HT18-17-SURF Percent Solids: 68.3% Start Date: 11/4/2018
Lab ID: 200-45893-E-11 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/9/2018
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
93.8
6.2
#4
4750
83.6
10.2
#10
2000
77.2
6.4
#20
850
72.7
4.5
#40
425
68.0
4.7
#60
250
52.6
15.4
#80
180
34.6
18.0
#100
150
26.3
8.3
#200
75
16.6
9.7
Hyd1
33.9
12.1
4.5
Hyd2
21.8
10.6
1.5
Hyd3
12.8
8.6
2.0
Hyd4
9.2
7.1
1.5
Hyd5
6.4
6.2
1.0
Hyd6
3.2
4.7
1.5
Hyd7
1.4
3.2
1.5
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
16.4
Sand
67.0
Coarse Sand
6.4
Medium Sand
9.2
Fine Sand
51.4
Silt
10.4
Clay
6.2
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
TEl8@6riii^!n0feilr4r§tln
200-45893-E-11 11/9/2018
1 of 1
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/26/2018
Client Sample ID
HT18-25-SURF
Start Date
11/02/2018 22:20
Lab Sample ID
200-45893-E-1
End Date
11/08/2018 16:22
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant
Tin Weight
1.05 g
Shape (>#10):
na
Wet Sample + Tin
19.94 g
Hardness (> #10):
na
Dry Sample + Tin
7.54 g
% Moisture
65.64 %
Date/Time in oven
11/02/2018 22:22
Date/Time out of oven
11/05/2018 14:29
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.11 212.94
168.83
Serial Number
542318
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
58
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
0.42
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
57.6
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
34.1
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
462.67
463.09
0.42 g
99.3 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
378.83
379.80
0.97 g
97.6 Sand
Medium
#40
425
353.16
353.55
0.39 g
96.9 Sand
Medium
#60
250
348.44
349.65
1.21 g
94.8 Sand
Fine
#80
180
338.00
339.43
1.43 g
92.3 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.69
329.77
1.08 g
90.4 Sand
Fine
#200
75
325.49
330.37
4.88 g
82.0 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
82.0
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
58
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0185
20.0
32.6
43.6 Silt
5
5
1.0170
20.0
21
39.5 Silt
15
15
1.0150
20.0
12.4
33.9 Silt
30
30
1.0135
20.0
8.9
29.8 Silt
60
63
1.0115
20.0
6.3
24.2 Silt
250
241
1.0095
20.0
3.3
18.7 Clay
1440
1388
1.0070
20.0
1.4
11.8 Clay
Page 83 of 1451
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/26/2018
Client Sample ID
HT18-23-SURF
Start Date
11/02/2018 22:25
Lab Sample ID
200-45893-E-2
End Date
11/08/2018 16:29
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant
Tin Weight
1.06 g
Shape (>#10):
na
Wet Sample + Tin
18.48 g
Hardness (> #10):
na
Dry Sample + Tin
7.02 g
% Moisture
65.79 %
Date/Time in oven
11/02/2018 22:26
Date/Time out of oven
11/05/2018 14:29
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.13 209.07
164.94
Serial Number
542318
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
56.4
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
0.41
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
56
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
34
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
462.67
463.08
0.41 g
99.3 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
374.53
374.78
0.25 g
98.9 Sand
Medium
#40
425
363.27
363.31
0.04 g
98.8 Sand
Medium
#60
250
353.59
353.67
0.08 g
98.7 Sand
Fine
#80
180
319.35
319.55
0.20 g
98.3 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.68
328.90
0.22 g
97.9 Sand
Fine
#200
75
314.63
317.14
2.51 g
93.4 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
93.4
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
56.4
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0210
20.0
31.6
52 Silt
5
5
1.0185
20.0
20.6
44.9 Silt
15
15
1.0170
20.0
12.1
40.6 Silt
30
31
1.0150
20.0
8.6
34.9 Silt
60
57
1.0120
20.0
6.5
26.3 Silt
250
235
1.0095
20.0
3.3
19.2 Clay
1440
1382
1.0070
20.0
1.4
12.1 Clay
Page 84 of 1451
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/26/2018
Client Sample ID
HT18-24-SURF
Start Date
11/04/2018 14:26
Lab Sample ID
200-45893-E-3
End Date
11/09/2018 10:17
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant, shell
Tin Weight
1.02 g
Shape (>#10):
subangular
Wet Sample + Tin
23.17 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
11.98 g
% Moisture
50.52 %
Date/Time in oven
11/04/2018 14:28
Date/Time out of oven
11/05/2018 14:38
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.08 270.58
226.5
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
112
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
12.6
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
99.4
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
43.9
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
447.25
453.51
6.26 g
94.4 Gravel
#4
4750
488.00
491.17
3.17 g
91.6 Gravel
#10
2000
462.60
465.79
3.19 g
88.8 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
378.83
380.83
2.00 g
87.0 Sand
Medium
#40
425
353.16
355.86
2.70 g
84.6 Sand
Medium
#60
250
348.44
356.70
8.26 g
77.2 Sand
Fine
#80
180
338.00
357.16
19.16 g
60.1 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.69
341.30
12.61 g
48.8 Sand
Fine
#200
75
325.49
340.54
15.05 g
35.4 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
35.4
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
112
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0130
20.0
34.6
14.7 Silt
5
5
1.0125
20.0
22
14 Silt
15
15
1.0115
20.0
12.8
12.5 Silt
30
30
1.0095
20.0
9.3
9.68 Silt
60
59
1.0085
20.0
6.7
8.25 Silt
250
256
1.0070
20.0
3.2
6.09 Clay
1440
1440
1.0055
20.0
1.4
3.94 Clay
Page 85 of 1451
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/26/2018
Client Sample ID
HT18-26-SURF
Start Date
11/04/2018 14:30
Lab Sample ID
200-45893-E-4
End Date
11/09/2018 10:21
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant, shell
Tin Weight
1.03 g
Shape (>#10):
na
Wet Sample + Tin
31.03 g
Hardness (> #10):
na
Dry Sample + Tin
17.40 g
% Moisture
45.43 %
Date/Time in oven
11/04/2018 14:32
Date/Time out of oven
11/05/2018 14:38
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.06 257.34
213.28
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
116
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
1.77
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
114
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
53.5
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
488.00
488.99
0.99 g
99.1 Gravel
#10
2000
462.60
463.38
0.78 g
98.4 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
374.53
375.43
0.90 g
97.6 Sand
Medium
#40
425
363.27
363.96
0.69 g
97.0 Sand
Medium
#60
250
353.59
356.61
3.02 g
94.4 Sand
Fine
#80
180
319.35
326.14
6.79 g
88.5 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.68
337.25
8.57 g
81.1 Sand
Fine
#200
75
314.63
367.88
53.25 g
35.2 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
35.2
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
116
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0135
20.0
34.4
14.9 Silt
5
5
1.0125
20.0
22
13.5 Silt
15
15
1.0105
20.0
13
10.7 Silt
30
30
1.0090
20.0
9.3
8.65 Silt
60
58
1.0075
20.0
6.8
6.58 Silt
250
256
1.0065
20.0
3.3
5.19 Clay
1440
1440
1.0050
20.0
1.4
3.12 Clay
Page 86 of 1451
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/26/2018
Client Sample ID
HT18-18-SURF
Start Date
11/04/2018 14:34
Lab Sample ID
200-45893-E-5
End Date
11/09/2018 10:40
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant, shell
Tin Weight
1.04 g
Shape (>#10):
subangular
Wet Sample + Tin
27.14 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
11.69 g
% Moisture
59.20 %
Date/Time in oven
11/04/2018 14:35
Date/Time out of oven
11/05/2018 14:38
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.78 242.52
197.74
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
80.7
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
1.4
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
79.3
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
40.1
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
488.00
488.66
0.66 g
99.2 Gravel
#10
2000
462.60
463.34
0.74 g
98.3 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
378.83
380.52
1.69 g
96.2 Sand
Medium
#40
425
353.16
353.81
0.65 g
95.4 Sand
Medium
#60
250
348.44
350.54
2.10 g
92.8 Sand
Fine
#80
180
338.00
343.44
5.44 g
86.1 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.69
334.11
5.42 g
79.4 Sand
Fine
#200
75
325.49
336.01
10.52 g
66.4 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
66.4
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
80.7
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0190
20.0
32.4
32.3 Silt
5
5
1.0175
20.0
20.8
29.4 Silt
15
15
1.0155
20.0
12.3
25.4 Silt
30
29
1.0130
20.0
9.1
20.4 Silt
60
58
1.0105
20.0
6.6
15.4 Silt
250
250
1.0085
20.0
3.2
11.4 Clay
1440
1434
1.0065
20.0
1.4
7.46 Clay
Page 87 of 1451
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/26/2018
Client Sample ID
HT18-19-SURF
Start Date
11/04/2018 14:37
Lab Sample ID
200-45893-E-6
End Date
11/09/2018 10:44
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant, shell
Tin Weight
1.05 g
Shape (>#10):
subangular
Wet Sample + Tin
51.06 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
35.71 g
% Moisture
30.69 %
Date/Time in oven
11/04/2018 14:38
Date/Time out of oven
11/05/2018 14:39
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.07 244.92
200.85
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
139
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
18.2
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
121
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
60.2
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
447.25
448.44
1.19 g
99.1 Gravel
#4
4750
488.00
495.78
7.78 g
93.5 Gravel
#10
2000
462.60
471.85
9.25 g
86.8 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
374.53
379.29
4.76 g
83.4 Sand
Medium
#40
425
363.27
369.53
6.26 g
78.9 Sand
Medium
#60
250
353.59
370.35
16.76 g
66.8 Sand
Fine
#80
180
319.35
342.40
23.05 g
50.2 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.68
350.94
22.26 g
34.2 Sand
Fine
#200
75
314.63
343.37
28.74 g
13.5 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
13.5
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
139
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0110
20.0
35.3
9.53 Silt
5
5
1.0100
20.0
22.6
8.38 Silt
15
15
1.0090
20.0
13.1
7.22 Silt
30
29
1.0075
20.0
9.6
5.49 Silt
60
63
1.0065
20.0
6.6
4.33 Silt
250
250
1.0055
20.0
3.3
3.18 Clay
1440
1434
1.0045
20.0
1.4
2.02 Clay
Page 88 of 1451
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/26/2018
Client Sample ID
HT18-20-SURF
Start Date
11/04/2018 14:40
Lab Sample ID
200-45893-E-7
End Date
11/09/2018 10:52
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
shell, plant
Tin Weight
1.03 g
Shape (>#10):
na
Wet Sample + Tin
39.60 g
Hardness (> #10):
na
Dry Sample + Tin
20.00 g
% Moisture
50.82 %
Date/Time in oven
11/04/2018 14:41
Date/Time out of oven
11/05/2018 14:46
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
45.19 250.60
205.41
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
101
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
21.3
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
79.7
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
38.8
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
447.25
457.66
10.41 g
89.7 Gravel
#4
4750
488.00
497.11
9.11 g
80.7 Gravel
#10
2000
462.60
464.36
1.76 g
79.0 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
378.83
379.96
1.13 g
77.9 Sand
Medium
#40
425
353.16
354.16
1.00 g
76.9 Sand
Medium
#60
250
348.44
350.76
2.32 g
74.6 Sand
Fine
#80
180
338.00
343.82
5.82 g
68.8 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.69
337.75
9.06 g
59.8 Sand
Fine
#200
75
325.49
354.26
28.77 g
31.3 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
31.3
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
101
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0185
20.0
32.6
25 Silt
5
5
1.0155
20.0
21.3
20.3 Silt
15
15
1.0135
20.0
12.6
17.1 Silt
30
31
1.0115
20.0
8.9
13.9 Silt
60
60
1.0095
20.0
6.5
10.7 Silt
250
240
1.0085
20.0
3.3
9.14 Clay
1440
1424
1.0065
20.0
1.4
5.96 Clay
Page 89 of 1451
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/26/2018
Client Sample ID
HT18-21-SURF
Start Date
11/04/2018 14:42
Lab Sample ID
200-45893-E-8
End Date
11/09/2018 10:55
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
shell, plant, glass
Tin Weight
1.05 g
Shape (>#10):
subangular
Wet Sample + Tin
46.59 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
35.83 g
% Moisture
23.63 %
Date/Time in oven
11/04/2018 14:44
Date/Time out of oven
11/05/2018 14:46
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.06 290.65
246.59
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
188
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
128
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
60
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
24.3
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
457.69
505.14
47.45 g
74.8 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
447.25
477.49
30.24 g
58.7 Gravel
#4
4750
488.00
515.11
27.11 g
44.3 Gravel
#10
2000
462.60
486.04
23.44 g
31.8 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
374.53
383.09
8.56 g
27.2 Sand
Medium
#40
425
363.27
373.15
9.88 g
21.9 Sand
Medium
#60
250
353.59
362.25
8.66 g
17.3 Sand
Fine
#80
180
319.35
322.71
3.36 g
15.5 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.68
330.91
2.23 g
14.3 Sand
Fine
#200
75
314.63
318.47
3.84 g
12.3 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
12.3
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
188
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) °/
'o Finer Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0080
20.0
36.3
4.49 Silt
5
5
1.0070
20.0
23.2
3.63 Silt
15
15
1.0065
20.0
13.5
3.2 Silt
30
31
1.0055
20.0
9.4
2.35 Silt
60
59
1.0050
20.0
6.9
1.92 Silt
250
234
1.0045
20.0
3.5
1.5 Clay
1440
1418
1.0035
20.0
1.4
0.641 Clay
Page 90 of 1451
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/26/2018
Client Sample ID
HT18-15-SURF
Start Date
11/04/2018 14:48
Lab Sample ID
200-45893-E-9
End Date
11/09/2018 11:04
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
shell, plant
Tin Weight
1.05 g
Shape (>#10):
na
Wet Sample + Tin
28.20 g
Hardness (> #10):
na
Dry Sample + Tin
15.55 g
% Moisture
46.59 %
Date/Time in oven
11/04/2018 14:50
Date/Time out of oven
11/05/2018 14:46
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.05 299.19
255.14
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
136
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
32.4
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
104
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
40.8
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
447.25
459.02
11.77 g
91.3 Gravel
#4
4750
488.00
499.12
11.12 g
83.1 Gravel
#10
2000
462.60
472.15
9.55 g
76.1 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
378.83
383.49
4.66 g
72.7 Sand
Medium
#40
425
353.16
360.29
7.13 g
67.5 Sand
Medium
#60
250
348.44
371.51
23.07 g
50.5 Sand
Fine
#80
180
338.00
356.26
18.26 g
37.1 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.69
339.09
10.40 g
29.5 Sand
Fine
#200
75
325.49
347.67
22.18 g
13.2 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
13.2
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
136
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0130
20.0
34.6
12.1 Silt
5
5
1.0115
20.0
22.2
10.3 Silt
15
15
1.0100
20.0
13
8.56 Silt
30
31
1.0090
20.0
9.1
7.38 Silt
60
59
1.0080
20.0
6.7
6.2 Silt
250
265
1.0065
20.0
3.2
4.43 Clay
1440
1412
1.0055
20.0
1.4
3.25 Clay
Page 91 of 1451
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/26/2018
Client Sample ID
HT18-16-SURF
Start Date
11/04/2018 14:51
Lab Sample ID
200-45893-E-10
End Date
11/09/2018 11:08
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant, shell
Tin Weight
1.04 g
Shape (>#10):
subangular
Wet Sample + Tin
37.15 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
16.21 g
% Moisture
57.99 %
Date/Time in oven
11/04/2018 14:53
Date/Time out of oven
11/05/2018 14:47
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.09 298.00
253.91
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
107
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
6.27
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
101
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
39.8
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
462.60
468.87
6.27 g
94.1 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
374.53
380.18
5.65 g
88.8 Sand
Medium
#40
425
363.27
370.14
6.87 g
82.4 Sand
Medium
#60
250
353.59
363.55
9.96 g
73.1 Sand
Fine
#80
180
319.35
323.82
4.47 g
68.9 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.68
330.18
1.50 g
67.5 Sand
Fine
#200
75
314.63
316.71
2.08 g
65.6 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
65.6
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
107
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0170
20.0
33.2
21.4 Silt
5
5
1.0115
20.0
22.2
13.1 Silt
15
15
1.0105
20.0
13
11.6 Silt
30
32
1.0085
20.0
9
8.63 Silt
60
60
1.0075
20.0
6.7
7.13 Silt
250
259
1.0060
20.0
3.3
4.88 Clay
1440
1406
1.0050
20.0
1.4
3.38 Clay
Page 92 of 1451
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/26/2018
Client Sample ID
HT18-17-SURF
Start Date
11/04/2018 14:53
Lab Sample ID
200-45893-E-11
End Date
11/09/2018 11:16
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
shell
Tin Weight
1.03 g
Shape (>#10):
angular
Wet Sample + Tin
49.60 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
34.21 g
% Moisture
31.69 %
Date/Time in oven
11/04/2018 14:55
Date/Time out of oven
11/05/2018 14:47
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.06 282.46
238.4
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
163
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
37.1
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
126
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
52.9
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
447.25
457.30
10.05 g
93.8 Gravel
#4
4750
488.00
504.55
16.55 g
83.6 Gravel
#10
2000
462.60
473.10
10.50 g
77.2 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
378.83
386.23
7.40 g
72.7 Sand
Medium
#40
425
353.16
360.77
7.61 g
68.0 Sand
Medium
#60
250
348.44
373.48
25.04 g
52.6 Sand
Fine
#80
180
338.00
367.32
29.32 g
34.6 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.69
342.27
13.58 g
26.3 Sand
Fine
#200
75
325.49
341.30
15.81 g
16.6 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
16.6
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
163
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0150
20.0
33.9
12.1 Silt
5
5
1.0135
20.0
21.8
10.6 Silt
15
15
1.0115
20.0
12.8
8.62 Silt
30
30
1.0100
20.0
9.2
7.14 Silt
60
63
1.0090
20.0
6.4
6.16 Silt
250
253
1.0075
20.0
3.2
4.68 Clay
1440
1400
1.0060
20.0
1.4
3.2 Clay
Page 93 of 1451
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/31/2018
Sample ID: HT-18-01-SURF-FD Percent Solids: 37.1% Start Date: 11/9/2018
Lab ID: 200-4598Q-E-3 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/15/2018
Shape (> #10): na Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): na
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
99.7
0.3
#10
2000
99.6
0.1
#20
850
98.1
1.5
#40
425
97.8
0.3
#60
250
97.1
0.7
#80
180
96.5
0.6
#100
150
95.8
0.7
#200
75
89.9
5.9
Hyd1
30.8
53.9
36.0
Hyd2
20.4
44.6
9.3
Hyd3
12
40.6
4.0
Hyd4
8.4
34.0
6.6
Hyd5
6.3
27.3
6.7
Hyd6
3.1
20.6
6.7
Hyd7
1.4
14.0
6.6
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.3
Sand
9.8
Coarse Sand
0.1
Medium Sand
1.8
Fine Sand
7.9
Silt
62.6
Clay
27.3
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
200-45980-E-3 11/15/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/31/2018
Sample ID: HT-18-01-SURF Percent Solids: 37.3% Start Date: 11/9/2018
Lab ID: 200-4598Q-E-4 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/15/2018
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
100.0
0.0
#20
850
97.8
2.2
#40
425
97.3
0.5
#60
250
96.5
0.8
#80
180
95.6
0.9
#100
150
95.1
0.5
#200
75
89.7
5.4
Hyd1
30.2
57.0
32.7
Hyd2
20
47.8
9.2
Hyd3
12
40.0
7.8
Hyd4
8.7
33.4
6.6
Hyd5
6.2
26.9
6.5
Hyd6
3.2
19.0
7.9
Hyd7
1.4
12.4
6.6
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
10.3
Coarse Sand
0.0
Medium Sand
2.7
Fine Sand
7.6
Silt
62.8
Clay
26.9
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
200-45980-E-4 11/15/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/31/2018
Sample ID: HT-18-02-SURF Percent Solids: 39.4% Start Date: 11/9/2018
Lab ID: 200-4598Q-E-5 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/15/2018
Shape (> #10): na Non-soil material: plant, shell
Hardness (> #10): na
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
99.2
0.8
#10
2000
98.4
0.8
#20
850
96.8
1.6
#40
425
95.8
1.0
#60
250
94.3
1.5
#80
180
93.1
1.2
#100
150
91.9
1.2
#200
75
85.0
6.9
Hyd1
32.6
41.8
43.2
Hyd2
21.1
36.5
5.3
Hyd3
12.5
29.9
6.6
Hyd4
9
24.6
5.3
Hyd5
6.7
19.2
5.4
Hyd6
3.3
15.3
3.9
Hyd7
1.4
10.0
5.3
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.8
Sand
14.2
Coarse Sand
0.8
Medium Sand
2.6
Fine Sand
10.8
Silt
65.8
Clay
19.2
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
200-45980-E-5 11/15/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/31/2018
Sample ID: HT-18-03-SURF Percent Solids: 34.4% Start Date: 11/9/2018
Lab ID: 200-4598Q-E-6 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/15/2018
Shape (> #10): na Non-soil material: plant, shell
Hardness (> #10): na
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
99.8
0.2
#10
2000
99.3
0.5
#20
850
96.9
2.4
#40
425
94.8
2.1
#60
250
91.2
3.6
#80
180
84.1
7.1
#100
150
76.1
8.0
#200
75
56.2
19.9
Hyd1
30.4
50.2
6.0
Hyd2
20.8
34.8
15.4
Hyd3
12.4
27.8
7.0
Hyd4
9
23.0
4.8
Hyd5
6.3
18.3
4.7
Hyd6
3.3
11.2
7.1
Hyd7
1.4
6.5
4.7
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.2
Sand
43.6
Coarse Sand
0.5
Medium Sand
4.5
Fine Sand
38.6
Silt
37.9
Clay
18.3
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
200-45980-E-6 11/15/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/31/2018
Sample ID: HT-18-04-SURF Percent Solids: 51.8% Start Date: 11/9/2018
Lab ID: 200-4598Q-E-7 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/15/2018
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
99.2
0.8
#20
850
98.3
0.9
#40
425
98.0
0.3
#60
250
96.4
1.6
#80
180
90.8
5.6
#100
150
81.4
9.4
#200
75
57.7
23.7
Hyd1
32.6
27.9
29.8
Hyd2
21.1
24.4
3.5
Hyd3
12.5
19.9
4.5
Hyd4
8.9
16.4
3.5
Hyd5
6.7
12.9
3.5
Hyd6
3.3
10.2
2.7
Hyd7
1.4
7.5
2.7
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
42.3
Coarse Sand
0.8
Medium Sand
1.2
Fine Sand
40.3
Silt
44.8
Clay
12.9
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
200-45980-E-7 11/15/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/31/2018
Sample ID: HT-18-05-SURF Percent Solids: 32.8% Start Date: 11/9/2018
Lab ID: 200-45980-E-8 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/15/2018
Shape (> #10): na Non-soil material: plant
Hardness (> #10): na
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
98.5
1.5
#20
850
95.9
2.6
#40
425
95.1
0.8
#60
250
94.1
1.0
#80
180
93.1
1.0
#100
150
92.0
1.1
#200
75
79.4
12.6
Hyd1
33.9
36.3
43.1
Hyd2
21.8
31.9
4.4
Hyd3
12.8
27.4
4.5
Hyd4
9.1
24.4
3.0
Hyd5
6.6
18.5
5.9
Hyd6
3.2
14.1
4.4
Hyd7
1.4
8.2
5.9
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
20.6
Coarse Sand
1.5
Medium Sand
3.4
Fine Sand
15.7
Silt
60.9
Clay
18.5
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
T QcO&SfySiin
200-45980-E-8 11/15/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/31/2018
Sample ID: HT-18-06-SURF Percent Solids: 35.4% Start Date: 11/9/2018
Lab ID: 200-4598Q-E-9 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/15/2018
Shape (> #10): na Non-soil material: plant, shell
Hardness (> #10): na
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
99.5
0.5
#20
850
98.0
1.5
#40
425
97.5
0.5
#60
250
96.7
0.8
#80
180
96.1
0.6
#100
150
95.3
0.8
#200
75
86.8
8.5
Hyd1
32.2
44.3
42.5
Hyd2
20.7
40.3
4.0
Hyd3
12.2
35.1
5.2
Hyd4
CO
CO
29.8
5.3
Hyd5
6.5
24.5
5.3
Hyd6
3.2
17.9
6.6
Hyd7
1.4
12.6
5.3
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
13.2
Coarse Sand
0.5
Medium Sand
2.0
Fine Sand
10.7
Silt
62.3
Clay
24.5
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
T llicOlf
200-45980-E-9 11/15/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/31/2018
Sample ID: HT-18-07-SURF Percent Solids: 55.8% Start Date: 11/9/2018
Lab ID: 20Q-45980-E-10 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/15/2018
Shape (> #10): na Non-soil material: plant
Hardness (> #10): na
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
99.6
0.4
#20
850
98.7
0.9
#40
425
97.8
0.9
#60
250
91.6
6.2
#80
180
74.5
17.1
#100
150
63.2
11.3
#200
75
43.2
20.0
Hyd1
34.1
16.4
26.8
Hyd2
21.9
14.3
2.1
Hyd3
12.8
12.9
1.4
Hyd4
9.3
10.8
2.1
Hyd5
6.7
8.7
2.1
Hyd6
3.3
6.6
2.1
Hyd7
1.4
4.5
2.1
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
56.8
Coarse Sand
0.4
Medium Sand
1.8
Fine Sand
54.6
Silt
34.5
Clay
8.7
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
T eBfigftc? 2cfifi£fijSbn
200-45980-E-10 11/15/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/31/2018
Sample ID: HT-18-13-SURF Percent Solids: 34.6% Start Date: 11/9/2018
Lab ID: 20Q-45980-E-11 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/15/2018
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
98.9
1.1
#20
850
98.0
0.9
#40
425
97.9
0.1
#60
250
97.6
0.3
#80
180
97.2
0.4
#100
150
96.4
0.8
#200
75
89.4
7.0
Hyd1
30.4
58.3
31.1
Hyd2
19.9
51.5
6.8
Hyd3
11.8
46.0
5.5
Hyd4
CO
CO
37.7
8.3
Hyd5
6.1
30.9
6.8
Hyd6
3.2
22.6
8.3
Hyd7
1.4
15.8
6.8
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
10.6
Coarse Sand
1.1
Medium Sand
1.0
Fine Sand
8.5
Silt
58.5
Clay
30.9
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
TdaaSfiiciadafuSgfcn
200-45980-E-11 11/15/2018
1 of 1
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 11/1/2018
Sample ID: HT18-14-SURF Percent Solids: 59.9% Start Date: 11/9/2018
Lab ID: 200-45998-E-2 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/15/2018
Shape (> #10): subangular Non-soil material: shell, glass
Hardness (> #10): hard
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
61.7
38.3
#4
4750
44.2
17.5
#10
2000
32.7
11.5
#20
850
28.7
4.0
#40
425
23.9
4.8
#60
250
17.5
6.4
#80
180
13.9
3.6
#100
150
12.6
1.3
#200
75
9.9
2.7
Hyd1
35
10.5
-0.6
Hyd2
22.7
7.7
2.8
Hyd3
13.2
6.6
1.1
Hyd4
9.4
4.3
2.3
Hyd5
6.8
3.7
0.6
Hyd6
3.4
2.6
1.1
Hyd7
1.4
2.0
0.6
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
55.8
Sand
34.3
Coarse Sand
11.5
Medium Sand
CO
CO
Fine Sand
14.0
Silt
6.2
Clay
3.7
FGT001C:0
03-06-2018
T eBSQftc? 4v:0£j8^yfc>n
200-45998-E-2 11/15/2018
1 of 1
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/31/2018
Client Sample ID
HT-18-01-SURF-FD
Start Date
11/09/2018 15:46
Lab Sample ID
200-45980-E-3
End Date
11/15/2018 14:23
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
shell
Tin Weight
1.05 g
Shape (>#10):
na
Wet Sample + Tin
27.21 g
Hardness (> #10):
na
Dry Sample + Tin
10.75 g
% Moisture
62.92 %
Date/Time in oven
11/09/2018 15:48
Date/Time out of oven
11/12/2018 14:18
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.12 206.66
162.54
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
60.3
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
0.21
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
60.1
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
37
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
488.00
488.17
0.17 g
99.7 Gravel
#10
2000
462.69
462.73
0.04 g
99.6 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
374.61
375.50
0.89 g
98.1 Sand
Medium
#40
425
362.90
363.06
0.16 g
97.8 Sand
Medium
#60
250
353.27
353.67
0.40 g
97.1 Sand
Fine
#80
180
319.30
319.66
0.36 g
96.5 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.44
328.85
0.41 g
95.8 Sand
Fine
#200
75
314.62
318.17
3.55 g
89.9 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
89.9
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
60.3
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0230
20.0
30.8
53.9 Silt
5
5
1.0195
20.0
20.4
44.6 Silt
15
15
1.0180
20.0
12
40.6 Silt
30
32
1.0155
20.0
8.4
34 Silt
60
60
1.0130
20.0
6.3
27.3 Silt
250
259
1.0105
20.0
3.1
20.6 Clay
1440
1406
1.0080
20.0
1.4
14 Clay
Page 75 of 866
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/31/2018
Client Sample ID
HT-18-01-SURF
Start Date
11/09/2018 15:50
Lab Sample ID
200-45980-E-4
End Date
11/15/2018 14:28
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material: na
Tin Weight
1.08 g
Shape (>#10): na
Wet Sample + Tin
25.07 g
Hardness (> #10): na
Dry Sample + Tin
10.03 g
% Moisture
62.69 %
Date/Time in oven
11/09/2018 15:51
Date/Time out of oven
11/12/2018 14:19
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.15 208.48
164.33
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
61.3
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
0
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
61.3
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
37.3
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (urn)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
0.00 g
100.0 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
378.71
380.03
1.32 g
97.8 Sand
Medium
#40
425
352.82
353.13
0.31 g
97.3 Sand
Medium
#60
250
348.29
348.81
0.52 g
96.5 Sand
Fine
#80
180
337.93
338.48
0.55 g
95.6 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.55
328.85
0.30 g
95.1 Sand
Fine
#200
75
325.44
328.78
3.34 g
89.7 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
89.7
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
61.3
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0245
20.0
30.2
57 Silt
5
5
1.0210
20.0
20
47.8 Silt
15
15
1.0180
20.0
12
40 Silt
30
30
1.0155
20.0
8.7
33.4 Silt
60
63
1.0130
20.0
6.2
26.9 Silt
250
253
1.0100
20.0
3.2
19 Clay
1440
1400
1.0075
20.0
1.4
12.4 Clay
Page 76 of 866
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/31/2018
Client Sample ID
HT-18-02-SURF
Start Date
11/09/2018 15:53
Lab Sample ID
200-45980-E-5
End Date
11/15/2018 14:35
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant, shell
Tin Weight
1.07 g
Shape (>#10):
na
Wet Sample + Tin
33.94 g
Hardness (> #10):
na
Dry Sample + Tin
14.02 g
% Moisture
60.60 %
Date/Time in oven
11/09/2018 15:55
Date/Time out of oven
11/12/2018 14:19
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.10 197.59
153.49
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
60.5
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
0.96
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
59.5
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
38.8
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
488.00
488.46
0.46 g
99.2 Gravel
#10
2000
462.69
463.19
0.50 g
98.4 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
374.61
375.55
0.94 g
96.8 Sand
Medium
#40
425
362.90
363.49
0.59 g
95.8 Sand
Medium
#60
250
353.27
354.20
0.93 g
94.3 Sand
Fine
#80
180
319.30
320.02
0.72 g
93.1 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.44
329.15
0.71 g
91.9 Sand
Fine
#200
75
314.62
318.81
4.19 g
85.0 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
85.0
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
60.5
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0185
20.0
32.6
41.8 Silt
5
5
1.0165
20.0
21.1
36.5 Silt
15
15
1.0140
20.0
12.5
29.9 Silt
30
30
1.0120
20.0
9
24.6 Silt
60
57
1.0100
20.0
6.7
19.2 Silt
250
247
1.0085
20.0
3.3
15.3 Clay
1440
1394
1.0065
20.0
1.4
9.95 Clay
Page 77 of 866
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/31/2018
Client Sample ID
HT-18-03-SURF
Start Date
11/09/2018 15:58
Lab Sample ID
200-45980-E-6
End Date
11/15/2018 14:41
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant, shell
Tin Weight
1.05 g
Shape (>#10):
na
Wet Sample + Tin
21.80 g
Hardness (> #10):
na
Dry Sample + Tin
8.19 g
% Moisture
65.59 %
Date/Time in oven
11/09/2018 15:59
Date/Time out of oven
11/12/2018 14:19
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.10 241.58
197.48
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
68
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
0.45
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
67.6
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
34.2
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
488.00
488.13
0.13 g
99.8 Gravel
#10
2000
462.69
463.01
0.32 g
99.3 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
378.71
380.37
1.66 g
96.9 Sand
Medium
#40
425
352.82
354.28
1.46 g
94.8 Sand
Medium
#60
250
348.29
350.74
2.45 g
91.2 Sand
Fine
#80
180
337.93
342.76
4.83 g
84.1 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.55
334.01
5.46 g
76.1 Sand
Fine
#200
75
325.44
338.97
13.53 g
56.2 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
56.2
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
68
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0240
20.0
30.4
50.2 Silt
5
5
1.0175
20.0
20.8
34.8 Silt
15
15
1.0145
20.0
12.4
27.8 Silt
30
30
1.0125
20.0
9
23 Silt
60
63
1.0105
20.0
6.3
18.3 Silt
250
241
1.0075
20.0
3.3
11.2 Clay
1440
1388
1.0055
20.0
1.4
6.5 Clay
Page 78 of 866
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/31/2018
Client Sample ID
HT-18-04-SURF
Start Date
11/09/2018 16:02
Lab Sample ID
200-45980-E-7
End Date
11/15/2018 14:46
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant, shell
Tin Weight
1.10 g
Shape (>#10):
na
Wet Sample + Tin
26.85 g
Hardness (> #10):
na
Dry Sample + Tin
14.43 g
% Moisture
48.23 %
Date/Time in oven
11/09/2018 16:04
Date/Time out of oven
11/12/2018 14:20
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.09 219.15
175.06
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
90.6
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
0.72
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
89.9
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
51.4
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
462.69
463.41
0.72 g
99.2 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
374.61
375.46
0.85 g
98.3 Sand
Medium
#40
425
362.90
363.18
0.28 g
98.0 Sand
Medium
#60
250
353.27
354.74
1.47 g
96.4 Sand
Fine
#80
180
319.30
324.38
5.08 g
90.8 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.44
336.94
8.50 g
81.4 Sand
Fine
#200
75
314.62
336.13
21.51 g
57.7 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
57.7
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
90.6
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0185
20.0
32.6
27.9 Silt
5
5
1.0165
20.0
21.1
24.4 Silt
15
15
1.0140
20.0
12.5
19.9 Silt
30
31
1.0120
20.0
8.9
16.4 Silt
60
57
1.0100
20.0
6.7
12.9 Silt
250
235
1.0085
20.0
3.3
10.2 Clay
1440
1382
1.0070
20.0
1.4
7.53 Clay
Page 79 of 866
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/31/2018
Client Sample ID
HT-18-05-SURF
Start Date
11/09/2018 17:32
Lab Sample ID
200-45980-E-8
End Date
11/15/2018 11:29
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant
Tin Weight
1.08 g
Shape (>#10):
na
Wet Sample + Tin
19.25 g
Hardness (> #10):
na
Dry Sample + Tin
7.03 g
% Moisture
67.25 %
Date/Time in oven
11/09/2018 17:34
Date/Time out of oven
11/12/2018 14:24
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.11 209.70
165.59
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
54.2
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
0.8
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
53.4
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
32.2
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
462.69
463.49
0.80 g
98.5 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
378.71
380.14
1.43 g
95.9 Sand
Medium
#40
425
352.82
353.25
0.43 g
95.1 Sand
Medium
#60
250
348.29
348.84
0.55 g
94.1 Sand
Fine
#80
180
337.93
338.46
0.53 g
93.1 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.55
329.17
0.62 g
92.0 Sand
Fine
#200
75
325.44
332.26
6.82 g
79.4 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
79.4
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
54.2
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0150
20.0
33.9
36.3 Silt
5
5
1.0135
20.0
21.8
31.9 Silt
15
15
1.0120
20.0
12.8
27.4 Silt
30
30
1.0110
20.0
9.1
24.4 Silt
60
59
1.0090
20.0
6.6
18.5 Silt
250
256
1.0075
20.0
3.2
14.1 Clay
1440
1440
1.0055
20.0
1.4
8.15 Clay
Page 80 of 866
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/31/2018
Client Sample ID
HT-18-06-SURF
Start Date
11/09/2018 17:37
Lab Sample ID
200-45980-E-9
End Date
11/15/2018 11:35
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant, shell
Tin Weight
1.04 g
Shape (>#10):
na
Wet Sample + Tin
17.42 g
Hardness (> #10):
na
Dry Sample + Tin
6.84 g
% Moisture
64.59 %
Date/Time in oven
11/09/2018 17:38
Date/Time out of oven
11/12/2018 14:25
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
45.03 216.57
171.54
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
60.7
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
0.28
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
60.4
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
35.2
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
462.69
462.97
0.28 g
99.5 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
374.61
375.50
0.89 g
98.0 Sand
Medium
#40
425
362.90
363.23
0.33 g
97.5 Sand
Medium
#60
250
353.27
353.74
0.47 g
96.7 Sand
Fine
#80
180
319.30
319.64
0.34 g
96.1 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.44
328.92
0.48 g
95.3 Sand
Fine
#200
75
314.62
319.76
5.14 g
86.8 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
86.8
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
60.7
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0195
20.0
32.2
44.3 Silt
5
5
1.0180
20.0
20.7
40.3 Silt
15
15
1.0160
20.0
12.2
35.1 Silt
30
30
1.0140
20.0
8.8
29.8 Silt
60
58
1.0120
20.0
6.5
24.5 Silt
250
256
1.0095
20.0
3.2
17.9 Clay
1440
1440
1.0075
20.0
1.4
12.6 Clay
Page 81 of 866
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/31/2018
Client Sample ID
HT-18-07-SURF
Start Date
11/09/2018 17:41
Lab Sample ID
200-45980-E-10
End Date
11/15/2018 11:42
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant
Tin Weight
1.03 g
Shape (>#10):
na
Wet Sample + Tin
23.40 g
Hardness (> #10):
na
Dry Sample + Tin
13.51 g
% Moisture
44.21 %
Date/Time in oven
11/09/2018 17:42
Date/Time out of oven
11/12/2018 14:25
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.11 250.44
206.33
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
115
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
0.51
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
114
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
55.3
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
462.69
463.20
0.51 g
99.6 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
378.71
379.73
1.02 g
98.7 Sand
Medium
#40
425
352.82
353.82
1.00 g
97.8 Sand
Medium
#60
250
348.29
355.38
7.09 g
91.6 Sand
Fine
#80
180
337.93
357.54
19.61 g
74.5 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.55
341.50
12.95 g
63.2 Sand
Fine
#200
75
325.44
348.39
22.95 g
43.2 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
43.2
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
115
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0145
20.0
34.1
16.4 Silt
5
5
1.0130
20.0
21.9
14.3 Silt
15
15
1.0120
20.0
12.8
12.9 Silt
30
29
1.0105
20.0
9.3
10.8 Silt
60
58
1.0090
20.0
6.7
8.73 Silt
250
250
1.0075
20.0
3.3
6.63 Clay
1440
1434
1.0060
20.0
1.4
4.54 Clay
Page 82 of 866
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
10/31/2018
Client Sample ID
HT-18-13-SURF
Start Date
11/09/2018 17:45
Lab Sample ID
200-45980-E-11
End Date
11/15/2018 11:48
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant, shell
Tin Weight
0.99 g
Shape (>#10):
na
Wet Sample + Tin
23.23 g
Hardness (> #10):
na
Dry Sample + Tin
8.69 g
% Moisture
65.38 %
Date/Time in oven
11/09/2018 17:46
Date/Time out of oven
11/12/2018 14:25
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.10 213.11
169.01
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
58.5
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
0.64
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
57.9
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
34.3
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
462.69
463.33
0.64 g
98.9 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
374.61
375.16
0.55 g
98.0 Sand
Medium
#40
425
362.90
362.95
0.05 g
97.9 Sand
Medium
#60
250
353.27
353.45
0.18 g
97.6 Sand
Fine
#80
180
319.30
319.56
0.26 g
97.2 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.44
328.88
0.44 g
96.4 Sand
Fine
#200
75
314.62
318.69
4.07 g
89.4 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
89.4
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
58.5
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0240
20.0
30.4
58.3 Silt
5
5
1.0215
20.0
19.9
51.5 Silt
15
15
1.0195
20.0
11.8
46 Silt
30
29
1.0165
20.0
8.8
37.7 Silt
60
63
1.0140
20.0
6.1
30.9 Silt
250
250
1.0110
20.0
3.2
22.6 Clay
1440
1434
1.0085
20.0
1.4
15.8 Clay
Page 83 of 866
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
11/1/2018
Client Sample ID
HT18-14-SURF
Start Date
11/09/2018 17:50
Lab Sample ID
200-45998-E-2
End Date
11/15/2018 11:53
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
shell, glass
Tin Weight
1.00 g
Shape (>#10):
subangular
Wet Sample + Tin
27.28 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
16.74 g
% Moisture
40.11 %
Date/Time in oven
11/09/2018 17:52
Date/Time out of oven
11/12/2018 14:26
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
44.77 280.94
236.17
Serial Number
542321
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
141
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/03/2018
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0035
Sample >=#10
95.1
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
45.9
Reading at High Temp
1.0020
% Passing #10
19.4
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00775
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
447.26
501.33
54.07 g
61.7 Gravel
#4
4750
488.00
512.74
24.74 g
44.2 Gravel
#10
2000
462.69
478.94
16.25 g
32.7 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
378.71
384.32
5.61 g
28.7 Sand
Medium
#40
425
352.82
359.59
6.77 g
23.9 Sand
Medium
#60
250
348.29
357.38
9.09 g
17.5 Sand
Fine
#80
180
337.93
342.94
5.01 g
13.9 Sand
Fine
#100
150
328.55
330.44
1.89 g
12.6 Sand
Fine
#200
75
325.44
329.20
3.76 g
9.9 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
9.9
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
141
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0120
20.0
35
10.5 Silt
5
5
1.0095
20.0
22.7
7.69 Silt
15
15
1.0085
20.0
13.2
6.55 Silt
30
31
1.0065
20.0
9.4
4.27 Silt
60
60
1.0060
20.0
6.8
3.7 Silt
250
240
1.0050
20.0
3.4
2.56 Clay
1440
1424
1.0045
20.0
1.4
1.99 Clay
Page 84 of 866
------- |