PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Daraft Risk Evaluation for
1-Bromopropane (1-BP)

Systematic Review Supplemental File:

Data Quality Evaluation of
Environmental Release and Occupational Exposure

Common Sources

CASRN: 106-94-5

xvEPA

United States

Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Chemical Safety and
Pollution Prevention

Br

ch3

August 2019


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

This document is a compilation of tables for the data extraction and evaluation of
common sources for environmental releases and occupational exposure of the first 10
chemicals. This document may contain sources that were not used for the risk evaluation of
1-Bromopropane. Each table shows the data point or set or information element
that was extracted and evaluated from a data source in accordance with Appendix
D of the Application of Systematic Review in TSCA Risk Evaluations. If the
source contains more than one data set or information element, the review provides an
overall confidence score for each data set or information element that is found
in the source. Therefore, it is possible that a source may have more than one overall
quality/confidence score.

Table of Contents

Page

Releases to the Environment	3

Occupational Exposure	11

Facility	51

Explanatory Notes

These explanatory notes provide context to understand the short comments in the data evaluation tables.

Domain

Metric

Description of Comments Field

Reliability

Methodology

Indicates the sampling/analytical methodology, estimation method, or
type of publication

Repre sentativene ss

Geographic Scope

Indicates the country of the study, publication, or underlying data

Applicability

Indicates whether the data are for a condition of use within scope of the
Risk Evaluation

Temporal Representativeness

Provides the year of study, publication, or underlying data

Sample Size

Describes the distribution of the sample or underlying data

Accessibility / Clarity

Metadata Completeness

Describes the completeness of the metadata

Variability and Uncertainty

Metadata Completeness

Indicates if study or publication addresses variability and uncertainty of
the data or information

2


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Releases to the Environment

3


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:	U.S. EPA. 2017. Toxics Release Inventory (TRI), reporting year 2016.

Type of Data Source Releases to the Environment; Environmental Release Data;

Hero ID	5041148

EXTRACTION
Parameter

Data



Life Cycle Stage:

Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):
Environmental Media:

Release or Emission Factor:

All
All

Provides media of release
Provides release data



EVALUATION

Domain Metric

Rating MWF* Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1: Methodology

Low X 1 3

Methodology used by submitters to estimate release data is not
known.

Domain 2: Representative

Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

High

X

1

1

TRI is U.S. based data

Metric 3:

Applicability

High

X

2

2

TRI includes industries included in the scopes of multiple
chemicals

Metric 4:

Temporal Representativeness

High

X

2

2

TRI data are from 2016

Metric 5:

Sample Size

Medium

X

1

2

Due to reporting requirements, statistical representativeness is

unclear.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

Low x 1

3

TRI only includes release media but no other metadata.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Low x 1

3

TRI does not address variability or uncertainty in submitter
provided data.

Overall Quality Determination^

Medium

1.8





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:	U.S. EPA. 2017. Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) basic plus data file, Hexabromocyclododecane (CAS # 25637-99-4), reporting

year 2017.

Type of Data Source Releases to the Environment; Environmental Release Data;

Hero ID	5079078

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life Cycle Stage:	All

Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):	All

Environmental Media:	Provides media of release

Release or Emission Factor:	Provides release data

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Low

X

1

3

Methodology used by submitters to estimate release data is not
known.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High

High
Medium

XX XX

1

2

2
1

1

2

2
2

TRI is U.S. based data

TRI includes industries included in the scopes of multiple
chemicals

TRI data are from 2017

Due to reporting requirements, statistical representativeness is
unclear.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

Low

X

1

3

TRI only includes release media but no other metadata.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Low

X

1

3

TRI does not address variability or uncertainty in submitter
provided data.

Overall Quality Determination^

Medium





1.8





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

5


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:	U.S. EPA. 2016. EPA Discharge Monitoring Report Data.

Type of Data Source Releases to the Environment; Environmental Release Data;
Hero ID	5176443

EXTRACTION
Parameter

Data



Life Cycle Stage:

Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):
Environmental Media:

Release or Emission Factor:

All
All

Provides media of release
Provides release data



EVALUATION

Domain Metric

Rating MWF* Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1: Methodology

Low X 1 3

Methodology used by submitters to estimate release data is not
known.

Domain 2: Representative

Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

High

X

1

1

DMR is U.S. based data

Metric 3:

Applicability

High

X

2

2

DMR includes industries included in the scopes of multiple
chemicals

Metric 4:

Temporal Representativeness

High

X

2

2

DMR data are from 2016

Metric 5:

Sample Size

Medium

X

1

2

Universe is limited to NPDES permit holders; statistical rep-

resentativeness is unclear.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

Low x 1

3

DMR only includes release media but no other metadata.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Low x 1

3

DMR does not address variability or uncertainty in submitter
provided data.

Overall Quality Determination^

Medium

1.8





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

I If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:	U.S. EPA. 2018. 2014 National Emissions Inventory Report.

Type of Data Source Releases to the Environment; Environmental Release Data;
Hero ID	4795870

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life Cycle Stage:

Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):

Release Source:

Environmental Media:

Release or Emission Factor:

Release Days per Year:

P2 Control & percent Efficiency:

All
All

Provides unit/process of release.
Provides media of release
Provides release data
Provides annual operating time.
Provides controls information.

EVALUATION











Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability











Metric 1:

Methodology

Medium

X 1

2

Submitters provide general method used to calculate emissions,











but details not provided.

Domain 2: Representative











Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

High

X 1

1

NEI is U.S. based data

Metric 3:

Applicability

High

x 2

2

NEI includes industries included in the scopes of multiple











chemicals.

Metric 4:

Temporal Representativeness

High

x 2

2

NEI data are from 2014

Metric 5:

Sample Size

Medium

x 1

2

Universe is limited to units subject to NESHAP with threshold











potential to emit, although states may have different require-











ments; statistical representativeness is unclear.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

High x

1

1

NEI includes release media and generally also includes daily
and annual operating time, specific unit/process that is the
source of release, and presence of engineering controls.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Low x

1

3

NEI does not address variability or uncertainty in submitter
provided data.

Overall Quality Determination^

High



1.4





Continued on next

page






-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

— continued from previous page

Source Citation:	U.S. EPA. 2018. 2014 National Emissions Inventory Report.

Type of Data Source Releases to the Environment; Environmental Release Data;

Hero ID	4795870

EVALUATION

Domain	Metric	Rating MWF* Score	Comments

* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:

U.S. EPA. 1995. Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates. EPA-453/R-95-017.

Type of Data Source

Releases to the Environment; Environmental Release Data;

Hero ID

5097879

EXTRACTION



Parameter

Data

Life Cycle Stage:	Tank Truck and Railcar Loading Model

Release or Emission Factor:	Cited for emission factors used for the inhalation exposure and release

model.

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X

1

1

EPA coordinated the data gathering activities; methodology
expected to be accurate and comprehensive of all leak release
sources.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Low

XX XX

1

2

2
1

1

4

6
3

Data are U.S. based.

EPA-coordinated studies were of synthetic organic chemical
manufacturing industry (SOCMI) type facilities, which may
include industries within the scopes of the chemicals, but may
also include industries outside of the scopes.

Underlying data collected through studies from 1980 to 1990.
Data more than 20 years old.

Emission factors are presented only as averages; underlying
distribution is not characterized.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

Medium

X

1

2

Metadata includes release media and equipment type that is
the source of the release. Does not include the duration over
which the emission factors were derived.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Low

X

1

3

Does not address variability or uncertainty in average emission
factors.

Overall Quality Determination^

Medium





2.2





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:	OPW Engineered Systems. 2014. Loading Systems Catalog. OPW Engineered Systems: A Dover Company. ES-LS-6/15-2M;

Uploaded November 18, 2014.

Type of Data Source Releases to the Environment; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

Hero ID	5097888

EXTRACTION
Parameter



Data







Life Cycle Stage:

Release or Emission Factor:



Tank Truck and Railcar Loading Model

Cited for loading arm volumes used to calculate air emissions in model.

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X 1

1

Data are provided by loading systems vendor; it is expected
vendor would provide accurate data on their own loading sys-
tems.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High

High
High

X 1

x 2

x 2
x 1

1

2

2
1

Vendor is U.S. based.

The loading systems offered in vendor's catalog are applicable
for the container types within scope of the model.

Catalog is indicated as copyrighted as of 2015.

Vendor's catalog offers loading systems of a variety of sizes,

and dimensions are provided for each offered size.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

High

x 1

1

All needed metadata for loading system dimensions are pro-
vided.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Medium

x 1

2

Variability among loading systems across vendors is unknown;
it is uncertain if the distribution of this vendor's products are
capture the distribution across all vendors. However, it is ex-
pected that these systems are a reasonable representation of
the systems offered in the U.S.

Overall Quality Determination^

High



1.1





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

10


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Occupational Exposure

11


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:

U.S. BLS. 2016. May 2016 Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates: National Industry-Specific Estimates.

Type of Data Source

Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

Hero ID

5079087

EXTRACTION



Parameter

Data

Life Cycle Stage:	All

Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):	All

Number of Sites:	Used to develop a method to estimate number of sites and workers.

Number of Workers:	Used to develop a method to estimate number of sites and workers.

EVALUATION







Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF* Score Comments

Domain 1: Reliability







Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X 1 1 BLS is expected to use reliable survey methods.

Domain 2: Representative

Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

High

X

1

1

U.S. based economic data

Metric 3:

Applicability

High

X

2

2

These economic data cover all industry and occupation types
in scope for all chemicals.

Metric 4:

Temporal Representativeness

High

X

2

2

The BLS OES data are from 2016

Metric 5:

Sample Size

High

X

1

1

The BLS OES program provides detailed statistics and esti-

mated relative standard error for each state, industry, and oc-
cupation survey conducted (https://www. bis.gov/oes/current/
oes_research_estimates. htm).

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

Medium x 1

2

BLS documents results and methods, but underlying survey
results not accessible.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Medium x 1

2

Limited discussion of variability and uncertainty in results.

Overall Quality Determination^

High

1.2





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

12


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:	U.S. Census Bureau. 2015. Statistics of U.S. Businesses (SUSB).

Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;
Hero ID	5097881

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life Cycle Stage:	All

Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):	All

Number of Sites:	Used to develop a method to estimate number of sites and workers.

Number of Workers:	Used to develop a method to estimate number of sites and workers.

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating MWF* Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1: Methodology

High

x 1

U.S. Census Bureau is expected to use reliable survey and cen-
sus methods.

Domain 2: Representative

Metric

2:

Geographic Scope

High

X

1

1

U.S. based economic data

Metric

3:

Applicability

High

X

2

2

These economic data cover all industry and occupation types
in scope for all chemicals.

Metric

4:

Temporal Representativeness

High

X

2

2

The Census Bureau SUSB data are from 2015

Metric

5:

Sample Size

High

X

1

1

The SUSB is a compilation of data extracted from the Business

Register, U.S. Census Bureau's "most complete, current, and
consistent data for U.S. business establishments." Incorporates
data from economic censuses and current business surveys,
quarterly and annual Federal tax records, and other depart-
mental and federal statistics. Expected to be sufficiently repre-
sentative. (https: / /www. census, gov/ programs-surveys/susb/
about.html)

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness	Medium X 1	2 U.S. Census Bureau documents results and methods, but un-

derlying survey results not accessible.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Medium x 1

2 Limited discussion of variability and uncertainty in results.

Overall Quality Determination^

High

1.2

Continued on next page

13


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

— continued from previous page

Source Citation:	U.S. Census Bureau. 2015. Statistics of U.S. Businesses (SUSB).

Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

Hero ID	5097881

EVALUATION

Domain	Metric	Rating MWF* Score	Comments

* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:	U.S. BLS. 2014. Employee Tenure News Release.

Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;
Hero ID	5080421

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life Cycle Stage:	All

Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):	All

Exposure Frequency:	Used to develop estimates of exposure frequency (working days per year

and working years)

EVALUATION

Domain	Metric	Rating MWF* Score	Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1: Methodology	High	X 1	1 BLS is expected to use reliable survey methods.

Domain 2: Representative

Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

High

X

1

1

U.S. based economic data

Metric 3:

Applicability

High

X

2

2

These economic data cover all industry types in scope for all
chemicals.

Metric 4:

Temporal Representativeness

High

X

2

2

Median employee tenure with current employer was obtained
from the BLS Current Population Survey for January 2014.

Metric 5:

Sample Size

High

X

1

1

The Current Population Survey (CPS) is a monthly sur-

vey of about 60,000 households. BLS provides de-
tailed statistical treatment of surveys. Expected to
be sufficiently representative. (https://www.bls.gov/cps/
documentation.htm^reliability)

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

Medium x 1

2

BLS documents results and methods, but underlying survey
results not accessible.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Medium x 1

2

Limited discussion of variability and uncertainty in results.

Overall Quality Determination^

High

1.2





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

15


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:

U.S. BLS. 2015. Hours and Employment by Industry Tables - August 6, 2015.

Type of Data Source

Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

Hero ID

5079873

EXTRACTION



Parameter

Data

Life Cycle Stage:	All

Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):	All

Exposure Frequency:	Used to develop estimates of exposure frequency (working days per year

and working years)

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X

1

1

BLS is expected to use reliable survey methods.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High

High
High

XX XX

1

2

2
1

1

2

2
1

U.S. based economic data

These economic data cover all industry types in scope for all
chemicals.

Hours and employment data are from 2016.

BLS Labor Productivity and Costs data are used to aid eco-
nomic policymaking, among other uses, and are expected to be
sufficiently representative.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

Medium

X

1

2

BLS documents results and methods, but underlying survey
results not accessible.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Medium

X

1

2

Limited discussion of variability and uncertainty in results.

Overall Quality Determination^

High





1.2





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

16


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:

U.S. Census Bureau. 2019. Survey of Income and Program Participation data.

Type of Data Source

Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

Hero ID

5080429

EXTRACTION



Parameter

Data

Life Cycle Stage:	All

Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):	All

Exposure Frequency:	Used to develop estimates of exposure frequency (working days per year

and working years)

EVALUATION







Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF* Score Comments

Domain 1: Reliability







Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X 1 1 U.S. Census Bureau is expected to use reliable survey and cen-







sus methods.

Domain 2: Representative

Metric

2:

Geographic Scope

High

X

1

1

U.S. based economic data

Metric

3:

Applicability

High

X

2

2

These economic data cover all industry types in scope for all
chemicals.

Metric

4:

Temporal Representativeness

High

X

2

2

EPA used the 2008 SIPP Panel Wave 1 (interview months of
September through December 2008).

Metric

5:

Sample Size

High

X

1

1

The SIPP survey is a continuous series of national panels, with

sample size ranging from 14,000 to 52,000 interviewed house-
holds. Panels range from 2.5 to 4 years. Expected to be suf-
ficiently representative, (https://www.census.gov/programs-
surveys/sipp / about / sipp-introduct ion-history, html)

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

Medium x 1

2

BLS documents results and methods, but underlying survey
results not accessible.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Medium x 1

2

Limited discussion of variability and uncertainty in results.

Overall Quality Determination^

High

1.2





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

17


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:	Cherrie, JW; Semple, S; Brouwer, D. 2004. Gloves and Dermal Exposure to Chemicals: Proposals for Evaluating Workplace

Effectiveness. Annals of Occupational Hygiene.

Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

Hero ID	5080435

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life Cycle Stage:

Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):
Route of Exposure:

PPE:

All
All

Used to develop a dermal exposure assessment method for volatile liq-
uids.

Provides concepts of glove effectiveness.

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X

1

1

Article is published in peer-reviewed scientific journal.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:

Metric 3:

Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

N/A
High
Medium
N/A

X
X

2
2

N/A
2
4

N/A

N/A. Geographic scope is not applicable to scientific research
of dermal exposures.

Article studies effectiveness of gloves in the workplace, which
is applicable to the scopes of multiple chemicals.

Article was published in 2004; more than 10 but less than 20
years old.

N/A. Article presents concepts of dermal exposure and glove
effectiveness. Sample size is not applicable.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

High

X

1

1

Article is well documented with methods, assumptions, and
sources.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

High

X

1

1

Detailed discussion on variability/uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination^	High	1.3

* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

18


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:	Dancik, Y; Bigliardi, PL; Bigliardi-Qi, Mei. 2015. What happens in the skin? Integrating skin permeation kinetics into studies

of developmental and reproductive toxicity following topical exposure. Reproductive Toxicology.

Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

Hero ID	3223617

EXTRACTION
Parameter

Data







Life Cycle Stage:

Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):
Route of Exposure:

All
All

Used to develop
uids.

a dermal exposure assessment method for volatile liq-

EVALUATION

Domain Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1: Methodology

High

X 1

1

Article is published in peer-reviewed scientific journal.

Domain 2: Representative

Metric 2: Geographic Scope

Metric 3: Applicability

Metric 4: Temporal Representativeness
Metric 5: Sample Size

N/A
High

High

N/A

x 2
x 2

N/A
2
2

N/A

N/A. Geographic scope is not applicable to scientific research
of dermal exposures.

Article studies skin permeation kinetics, which is applicable to
the scopes of multiple chemicals.

Article was published in 2015; less than 10 years old.

N/A. Article studies science of skin permeation and toxicity.
Sample size is not applicable.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

High

x 1

1

Article is well documented with methods, assumptions, and
sources.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

High

x 1

1

Detailed discussion on variability/uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination^

High



1.0



* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

19


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:	Erasch, HF; Bunge, AL. 2015. The transient dermal exposure II: post-exposure absorption and evaporation of volatile com-

pounds. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

Hero ID	3230538

EXTRACTION
Parameter



Data







Life Cycle Stage:

Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):
Route of Exposure:

All
All

Used to develop
uids.

a dermal exposure assessment method for volatile liq-

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X 1

1

Article is published in peer-reviewed scientific journal.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:

Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

N/A
High

High

N/A

x 2
x 2

N/A
2

2

N/A

N/A. Geographic scope is not applicable to scientific research
of dermal exposures.

Article studies transient dermal exposure of volatile chemicals
that evaporate and absorb into skin simultaneously, which is
applicable to the scopes of multiple chemicals.

Article was published in 2015; less than 10 years old.

N/A. Article studies science of skin permeation and evapora-
tion. Sample size is not applicable.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

High

x 1

1

Article is well documented with methods, assumptions, and
sources.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

High

x 1

1

Detailed discussion on variability/uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination^

High



1.0



* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

20


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:	Frasch FH. 2012. Dermal Absorption of Finite doses of Volatile Compounds. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

Hero ID	5097903

EXTRACTION
Parameter



Data







Life Cycle Stage:

Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):
Route of Exposure:

All
All

Used to develop
uids.

a dermal exposure assessment method for volatile liq-

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X 1

1

Article is published in peer-reviewed scientific journal.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:

Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

N/A
High

High

N/A

x 2
x 2

N/A
2

2

N/A

N/A. Geographic scope is not applicable to scientific research
of dermal exposures.

Article studies transient dermal exposure of volatile chemicals
that evaporate and absorb into skin simultaneously, which is
applicable to the scopes of multiple chemicals.

Article was published in 2012; less than 10 years old.

N/A. Article studies science of skin permeation and evapora-
tion. Sample size is not applicable.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

High

x 1

1

Article is well documented with methods, assumptions, and
sources.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

High

x 1

1

Detailed discussion on variability/uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination^

High



1.0



* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

21


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:	Erasch, HF; Dotson, GS; Barbero, AM. 2011. In vitro human epidermal penetration of 1-bromopropane. Journal of Toxicology

and Environmental Health, Part A: Current Issues.

Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

Hero ID	1247930

EXTRACTION
Parameter

Data







Life Cycle Stage:

Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):
Route of Exposure:

All
All

Used to develop
uids.

a dermal exposure assessment method for volatile liq-

EVALUATION

Domain Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1: Methodology

High

X 1

1

Article is published in peer-reviewed scientific journal.

Domain 2: Representative

Metric 2: Geographic Scope

Metric 3: Applicability

Metric 4: Temporal Representativeness
Metric 5: Sample Size

N/A
High

High

N/A

x 2
x 2

N/A
2
2

N/A

N/A. Geographic scope is not applicable to scientific research
of dermal exposures.

Article studies human epidermal penetration of 1-BP, which is
applicable to the scope of 1-BP.

Article was published in 2011; less than 10 years old.

N/A. Article studies science of skin permeation and evapora-
tion. Sample size is not applicable.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

High

x 1

1

Article is well documented with methods, assumptions, and
sources.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

High

x 1

1

Detailed discussion on variability/uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination^

High



1.0



* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

22


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:

Type of Data Source
Hero ID

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life Cycle Stage:	All

Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):	All

Route of Exposure:	Used to develop a dermal exposure assessment method for volatile liq-

uids.

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X

1

1

Article is published in peer-reviewed scientific journal.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Medium
High

X
X

1

2

2
2

Study measured dermal exposures during activities in the UK.

Study measured dermal exposures during occupational activi-
ties, which is generally relevant to the scopes of multiple chem-

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High

X
X

2
1

4
1

Article was published in 2001; more than 10 years but less than
20 years old.

Statistics of the inside-glove exposures measured are well char-
acterized.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

High

X

1

1

Metadata of the measured exposures are well documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

High

X

1

1

Detailed discussion on variability/uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination^

High





1.3





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

I If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

23

Garrod, AN; Phillips, AM; Pemberton, JA. 2001. Potential exposure of hands inside protective gloves" a summary of data
from non-agricultural pesticide surveys. Annals of Occupational Hygiene.

Occupational Exposure; Monitoring Data;

5080256


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:

Type of Data Source
Hero ID

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life Cycle Stage:	All

Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):	All

Route of Exposure:	Used to develop a dermal exposure assessment method for volatile liq-

uids.

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X

1

1

Article is published in peer-reviewed scientific journal.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:

Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

N/A
High

Medium
N/A

X
X

2
2

N/A
2

4

N/A

N/A. Geographic scope is not applicable to scientific research
of dermal exposures.

Article studies transient dermal exposure of volatile chemicals
that evaporate and absorb into skin simultaneously, which is
applicable to the scopes of multiple chemicals.

Article was published in 2006; more than 10 years but less than
20 years old.

N/A. Article studies science of skin permeation and evapora-
tion. Sample size is not applicable.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

High

X

1

1

Article is well documented with methods, assumptions, and
sources.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

High

X

1

1

Detailed discussion on variability/uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination^

High





1.3





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

24

Kasting, BG; Miller, MA. 2006. Kinetics of finite dose absorption through skin 2: Volatile compounds. Journal of Pharma-
ceutical Sciences.

Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

5018573


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:

Type of Data Source
Hero ID

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life Cycle Stage:	All

Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):	All

Route of Exposure:	Used to develop a dermal exposure assessment method for volatile liq-

uids.

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X

1

1

Article is published in peer-reviewed scientific journal.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:

Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

N/A
High

High
Medium

X XX

2

2
1

N/A
2

2
2

N/A. Geographic scope not applicable to the validation of the
ECETOC TRA model.

ECETOC TRA model and exposure studies used for validation
cover a variety of occupational scenarios, which are applicable
to the scopes of multiple chemicals.

Article was published in 2017; less than 10 years old.

Statistics of dermal exposure observations obtained from the
literature are not fully characterized.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

Medium

X

1

2

Article is well documented with methods, assumptions, and
results; however, sources used from literature search are not
fully described and the metadata associated with the literature
review exposure studies are not provided.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

High

X

1

1

Detailed discussion on variability/uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination^

High





1.3





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

25

Marquart, H; Franken, R; Goede, H; Fransman, W; Schinkel, J. 2017. Validation of the dermal exposure model in ECETOC
TRA. Annals of Work Exposures and Health.

Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

5080455


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:	Baldwin, PE; Maynard, AD. 1998. A Survey of Wind Speed in Indoor Workplaces. Annals of Occupational Hygiene.

Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

Hero ID	3045135

EXTRACTION









Parameter

Data







Life Cycle Stage:

All







Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):

All







Route of Exposure:

Used to develop a

dermal exposure assessment method for volatile liq-



uids.







EVALUATION









Domain Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability









Metric 1: Methodology

High

X 1

1

Article is published in peer-reviewed scientific journal.

Domain 2: Representative









Metric 2: Geographic Scope

Medium

X 1

2

Article studied wind speeds in indoor workplaces in the UK.

Metric 3: Applicability

High

x 2

2

The types of workplaces studied include workplaces applicable









to the scopes of multiple chemicals.

Metric 4: Temporal Representativeness

Medium

x 2

4

Article was published in 1998; more than 10 years but less than









20 years old.

Metric 5: Sample Size

High

x 1

1

Statistics of wind speed surveys are well characterized.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity









Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

High

x 1

1

Article is well documented with methods, assumptions, results,









and sources.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty









Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

High

x 1

1

Detailed discussion on variability/uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination^

High



1.3





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

26


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:

OSHA. 2017. Chemical Exposure Health Data (CEHD) provided by OSHA to EPA.

Type of Data Source

Occupational Exposure; Monitoring Data;

Hero ID

3827305

EXTRACTION



Parameter

Data

Life Cycle Stage:	All

Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):	All

Exposure Concentration (Unit):	Provides personal breathing zone and area monitoring data.

EVALUATION













Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X

1

1

OSHA and state inspectors are expected to use OSHA or
NIOSH sampling methods. Samples sent to the OSHA SLTC
are expected to be analyzed using OSHA or NIOSH analytical
methods.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

High
High

XX XX

1

2

2
1

1

4

2
1

U.S. based exposure data

The OSHA data include occupational scenarios within the
scopes of the chemicals as identified by NAICS code and facility
name. However, some occupational scenarios are not clear and
cannot be clearly mapped to conditions of use within scope.
Data provided by OSHA are not more than 10 years old.

Individual measurements are provided so the sample sets can
be fully statistically characterized.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

Medium

X

1

2

OSHA data include sample type and exposure type. Sample
times also provided. Exposure frequency is inconsistently pro-
vided. Worker job descriptions provided, but often lacks suffi-
cient clarity.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Low

X

1

3

OSHA data do not discuss variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination^

High





1.6





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

27


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:	Defense Occupational and Environmental Health Readiness System - Industrial Hygiene (DOEHRS-IH). 2018. Email between

DOD and EPA: RE: [Non-DoD Source] Update: DoD exposure data for EPA risk evaluation - EPA request for additional
information.

Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Monitoring Data;

Hero ID	5178607

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life Cycle Stage:

Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):
Exposure Concentration (Unit):

All
All

Provides personal breathing zone monitoring data.

EVALUATION

Domain	Metric	Rating MWF* Score	Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1: Methodology	High	x 1	1 DOD service branches use OSHA and NIOSH methods and

DOD methods, which are expected to be equivalent to OSHA
or NIOSH methods.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

High x 1
Medium x 2

Metric 4: Temporal Representativeness High x 2
Metric 5: Sample Size	High x 1

1	U.S. based exposure data

4 The DOD data include occupational conditions of use within
the scopes of the chemicals, although additional uses poten-
tially outside of scope may also be included. However, some
occupational scenarios are not clear and cannot be clearly
mapped to conditions of use within scope.

2	Approximately 82 percent of the samples provided by DOD are
not more than 10 years old.

1	Individual measurements are provided so the sample sets can

be fully statistically characterized.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness	Medium X 1	2 DOD data include sample type (PBZ), sample time, process

duration and frequency, and workshift duration. Process and
worker job descriptions are provided, but inconsistent in detail
and often lack sufficient clarity.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness	Low	X 1	3 DOD data do not discuss variability or uncertainty.

Continued on next page

28


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

— continued from previous page

Source Citation:	Defense Occupational and Environmental Health Readiness System - Industrial Hygiene (DOEHRS-IH). 2018. Email between

DOD and EPA: RE: [Non-DoD Source] Update: DoD exposure data for EPA risk evaluation - EPA request for additional
information.

Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Monitoring Data;

Hero ID	5178607

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating MWF* Score

Comments

Overall Quality Determination^



High 1.6





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

29


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:	California Air Resources Board. 2000. Initial statement of reasons for the proposed airborne toxic control measure for emissions

of chlorinated toxic air contaminants from automotive maintenance and repair activities.

Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

Hero ID	5071458

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life Cycle Stage:	Brake Servicing Model

Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):	Brake Servicing Model

Route of Exposure:	Used to develop an inhalation exposure model.

EVALUATION













Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability













Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X

1

1

CARB is expected to use reliable data collection and survey













methods.

Domain 2: Representative













Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

High

X

1

1

Data surveyed and collected from U.S. (California) facilities

Metric 3:

Applicability

High

X

2

2

The CARB data are specific to brake servicing and include













halogenated solvent aerosol brake cleaners, which is applicable













to the scope of the model.

Metric 4:

Temporal Representativeness

Medium

X

2

4

The report was published in 2000, the manufacturer and facil-













ity surveys were conducted in 1997 and 1998, and site visits













were conducted circa 1998. All less than 20 years old (from













2016).

Metric 5:

Sample Size

Medium

X

1

2

Some data elements from site visits include all individual data













points; some surveyed data elements include some statistics













(more than range but not full distribution), and some data













elements have limited distribution information.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity











Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

X

1

1

Report fully documents its data sources, assessment methods,













results, and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty











Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

High

X

1

1

Report discusses and addresses variability and uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination^	High	1.3

Continued on next page

30


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

— continued from previous page

Source Citation:	California Air Resources Board. 2000. Initial statement of reasons for the proposed airborne toxic control measure for emissions

of chlorinated toxic air contaminants from automotive maintenance and repair activities.

Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

Hero ID	5071458

EVALUATION

Domain	Metric	Rating MWF* Score	Comments

* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

31


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:

Type of Data Source
Hero ID

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life Cycle Stage:	Brake Servicing Model

Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):	Brake Servicing Model

Route of Exposure:	Used to develop an inhalation exposure model.

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X

1

1

Article is published in peer-reviewed scientific journal.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:

Metric 3:
Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium

High
Low

Medium

XXX X

1

2
2

1

2

2
6

2

Air ventilation rate data are at least in part based on European
data (but may also include U.S. data).

Ventilation rate data are applicable to the scope of the model.

Paper published in 2009; data are based on 2006 and 1991 data.
Data are in part more than than 20 years old (as measured from
2016).

Ventilation rate provided as range with uncertain distribution.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

Medium

X

1

2

Sources are cited, but does not provide details on how reported
values were derived from cited sources.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Medium

X

1

2

Variability of ventilation rates provided, but uncertainty not
discussed.

Overall Quality Determination^

Medium





1.9





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

32

Demou, E.,Hellweg, S.,Wilson, M. P.,Hammond, S. K.,McKone, T. E.. 2009. Evaluating indoor exposure modeling alternatives
for LCA: A case study in the vehicle repair industry. Environmental Science and Technology.

Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

2591566


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:	Golsteijn, L.,Huizer, D.,Hauck, M.,van Zelm, R.,Huijbregts, M. A.. 2014. Including exposure variability in the life cycle

impact assessment of indoor chemical emissions: the case of metal degreasing. Environment International.

Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

Hero ID	2537636

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life Cycle Stage:

Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):
Route of Exposure:

Brake Servicing Model
Brake Servicing Model

Used to develop an inhalation exposure model.

EVALUATION

Domain	Metric	Rating MWF* Score	Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X

1

1

Article is published in peer-reviewed scientific journal.

Domain 2: Representative













Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

Medium

X

1

2

Air ventilation rate data based on European data.

Metric 3:

Applicability

High

X

2

2

Ventilation rate data are applicable to the scope of the model.

Metric 4:

Temporal Representativeness

High

X

2

2

Ventilation rate data based on 2012 and 2003 sources. Article













published in 2014.

Metric 5:

Sample Size

Medium

X

1

2

Ventilation rate provided as range with uncertain distribution.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness	Medium X 1	2 Sources are cited, but does not provide details on how reported

values were derived from cited sources.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Medium x 1

2 Variability of ventilation rates provided, but uncertainty not
discussed.

Overall Quality Determination^

High

1.4



* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

33


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:

Type of Data Source
Hero ID

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life Cycle Stage:	Brake Servicing Model

Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):	Brake Servicing Model

Route of Exposure:	Used to develop an inhalation exposure model.

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X

1

1

Article is published in peer-reviewed scientific journal.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:

Metric 3:
Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium

High
Low

Medium

X XX X

1

2
2

1

2

2
6

2

Air ventilation rate data are at least in part based on European
data (but may also include U.S. data).

Ventilation rate data are applicable to the scope of the model.

Paper published in 2009; data appear to be from sources dating
from 1989 to 1993.

Ventilation rate provided as range with uncertain distribution.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

Medium

X

1

2

Sources are cited, but does not provide details on how reported
values were derived from cited sources.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Medium

X

1

2

Variability of ventilation rates provided, but uncertainty not
discussed.

Overall Quality Determination^

Medium





1.9





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

34

Hellweg, S; Demou, E; Bruzzi, R; Meijer, A; Rosenbaum, RK; Huijbregts, MA; Mckone, TE. 2009. Integrating human indoor
air pollutant exposure within Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Environmental Science and Technology.

Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

634560


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:	Scientific Consulting Group, Inc.. 2013. Final peer review comments for the OPPT trichloroethylene (TCE) draft risk

assessment.

Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

Hero ID	3044932

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life Cycle Stage:	Brake Servicing Model

Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):	Brake Servicing Model

Route of Exposure:	Used to develop an inhalation exposure model.

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Low

X

1

3

Peer reviewer does not provide data sources or techniques used
to arrive at ventilation rate estimates.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
Medium

Medium

XXX X

1

2
2

1

1

2
4

2

Peer reviewer's experience appears to be U.S. based.

Ventilation rate data are applicable to the scope of the model.

Time period of the peer reviewer's observations not provided,
but not expected to be outdated.

Ventilation rate provided as range with uncertain distribution.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

Low

X

1

3

Underlying data sources not transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Medium

X

1

2

Variability of ventilation rates provided, but uncertainty not
discussed.

Overall Quality Determination^

Medium





1.9





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

35


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:

Type of Data Source
Hero ID

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life Cycle Stage:	1) Dry Cleaning Release Model2) Dry Cleaning Exposure Model

Route of Exposure:	Provides data used in inhalation exposure and release models (number

of loads per day).

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X

1

1

Article is published in peer-reviewed scientific journal.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High

High

High

XX X X

1

2

2
1

1

2

2
1

Studies New Jersey (U.S.) based dry cleaners.

Observed dry cleaning data are applicable to the scope of the
model.

Paper published in 2010, site visits conducted circa 2009; less
than 10 years old.

Limited number of samples, but individual data points allow
characterization of distribution.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

High

X

1

1

Article fully documents its data sources, assessment methods,
results, and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

High

X

1

1

Discusses uncertainty and variability in observed data.

Overall Quality Determination^

High





1.0





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

36

Blando, J. D.,Schill, D. P.,De La Cruz, M. R,Zhang, L.,Zhang, J.. 2010. Preliminary study of propyl bromide exposure
among New Jersey dry cleaners as a result of a pending ban on perchloroethylene. Journal of the Air and Waste Management
Association.

Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

1619253


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:	California Air Resources Board. 2006. California Dry Cleaning Industry Technical Assessment Report. Stationary Source

Division, Emissions Assessment Branch.

Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

Hero ID	5176440

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life Cycle Stage:	1) Dry Cleaning Release Model2) Dry Cleaning Exposure Model3) Spot

Cleaning Exposure Model

Route of Exposure:	Provides data used in inhalation exposure and release models.

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X

1

1

CARB is expected to use reliable data collection and survey
methods.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High

Medium

High

XX X X

1

2

2
1

1

2

4
1

Data surveyed and collected from U.S. (California) facilities
Observed dry cleaning data are applicable to the scope of the
model.

Report published in 2006, data surveyed and collected circa
2003; more than 10 years old but less than 20 years.

Collected data are generally provided with robust statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

High

X

1

1

Article fully documents its data sources, assessment methods,
results, and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

High

X

1

1

Discusses uncertainty and variability in observed data.

Overall Quality Determination^

High





1.2





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

37


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:

Niosh,. 1997. Hazard control: Control of exposure to perchloroethylene in commercial drycleaning (machine design) (HC 18).

Type of Data Source

Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

Hero ID

3974935

EXTRACTION



Parameter

Data

Life Cycle Stage:	1) Dry Cleaning Release Model2) Dry Cleaning Exposure Model

Route of Exposure:	Provides data used in inhalation exposure and release models.

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X

1

1

NIOSH is expected to use reliable data collection and survey
methods.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
Medium

Low

XXX X

1

2
2

1

1

2
4

3

Data are based on U.S. dry cleaning machines.

Dry cleaning data are applicable to the scope of the model.

Document published in 1997; more than 10 years old but gen-
erally less than 20 years.

Data characterized with no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

Low

X

1

3

Provides results but generally does not provide data sources,
methods, or assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Low

X

1

3

Generally does not discuss variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination^

Medium





1.9





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

38


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:	Niosh,. 1997. Control of health and safety hazards in commercial drycleaners: chemical exposures, fire hazards, and ergonomic

risk factors.

Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

Hero ID	3044963

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life Cycle Stage:	1) Dry Cleaning Release Model2) Dry Cleaning Exposure Model

Route of Exposure:	Provides data used in inhalation exposure and release models.

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X

1

1

NIOSH is expected to use reliable data collection and survey
methods.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
Medium

Low

XXX X

1

2
2

1

1

2
4

3

Data are based on U.S. dry cleaning machines.

Dry cleaning data are applicable to the scope of the model.
Document published in 1997; more than 10 years old but gen-
erally less than 20 years.

Data characterized with no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

Low

X

1

3

Provides results but generally does not provide data sources,
methods, or assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Low

X

1

3

Generally does not discuss variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination^

Medium





1.9





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

39


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:	Eisenberg, J.,Ramsey, J.. 2010. Health hazard evaluation report no. HETA 2008-0175-3111, Evaluation of 1-Bromopropane

use in four New Jersey commercial dry cleaning facilities.

Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

Hero ID	3970603

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life Cycle Stage:	1) Dry Cleaning Release Model2) Dry Cleaning Exposure Model

Route of Exposure:	Provides data used in inhalation exposure and release models.

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X

1

1

NIOSH is expected to use reliable data collection methods.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High

High

XXX X

1

2
2

1

1

2
2

1

Data are based on U.S. dry cleaning machines.

Dry cleaning data are applicable to the scope of the model.
Site visits conducted in 2008; less than 10 years old (from
2016).

Limited number of samples, but individual data points allow
characterization of distribution.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

High

X

1

1

Article fully documents its data sources, assessment methods,
results, and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Medium

X

1

2

Discusses variability among the different sites.

Overall Quality Determination^

High





1.1





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

40


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:

Type of Data Source
Hero ID

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life Cycle Stage:	1) Dry Cleaning Release Model2) Dry Cleaning Exposure Model3) Spot

Cleaning Exposure Model

Route of Exposure:	Provides data used in inhalation exposure and release models.

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X

1

1

King County has used reliable data collection and survey meth-
ods.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High

High

XXX X

1

2
2

1

1

2
2

1

Data are based on U.S. dry cleaning machines (Washington).

Dry cleaning data are applicable to the scope of the model.

Site visits conducted in 2009-2010, with surveys conducted af-
terwards; less than 10 years old (from 2016).

Collected data are generally provided with robust statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

High

X

1

1

Article fully documents its data sources, assessment methods,
results, and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

High

X

1

1

Discusses uncertainty and variability in observed data.

Overall Quality Determination^

High





1.0





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

41

Whittaker, SG; Johanson, CA. 2011. A profile of the dry cleaning industry in King County, Washington: Final report. Local
Hazardous Waste Management Program in King County.

Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

3827371


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:	Institute for Research and Technical Assistance. 2007. Spotting chemicals: Alternatives to perchloroethylene and

trichloroethylene in the textile cleaning industry.

Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

Hero ID	3045700

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life Cycle Stage:	1) Spot Cleaning Exposure Model2) Dry Cleaning Exposure Model

Route of Exposure:	Provides data used in inhalation exposure models.

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X

1

1

CalEPA and EPA funded project expected to use reliable data
collection methods.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Low

X
X
X
X

1

2
2
1

1

2

2

3

Data are based on U.S. dry cleaning machines (California)
Dry cleaning data are applicable to the scope of the model.
Report published in 2007; less than 10 years old (from 2016).
Data characterized with no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

Low

X

1

3

Provides results but generally does not provide data sources,
methods, or assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Low

X

1

3

Generally does not discuss variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination^

Medium





1.7





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

42


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:	von Grote, J.,Hurlimann, C.,Scheringer, M.,Hungerbiihler, K.. 2006. Assessing occupational exposure to perchloroethylene in

dry cleaning. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene.

Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

Hero ID	632592

EXTRACTION
Parameter

Data

Life Cycle Stage:
Route of Exposure:

1) Spot Cleaning Exposure Model2) Dry Cleaning Exposure Model
Provides data used in inhalation exposure models.

EVALUATION











Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability











Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X 1

1

Article is published in peer-reviewed scientific journal.

Domain 2: Representative











Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

Medium

X 1

2

Data based on German dry cleaners (OECD country).

Metric 3:

Applicability

High

x 2

2

Dry cleaning data are applicable to the scope of the model.

Metric 4:

Temporal Representativeness

Medium

x 2

4

Work based on dissertation published in 2003. More than 10











but less than 20 years old.

Metric 5:

Sample Size

Medium

x 1

2

The various data elements used from the study are presented











mostly as ranges or averages.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

Medium x 1

2

Sources are cited, but does not provide details on how reported
values were derived from cited sources.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Medium x 1

2

Variability in parameter values discussed, but no discussion of
uncertainties.

Overall Quality Determination^

Medium

1.7





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

43


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:	Morris, M; Wolf, K. 2005. Evaluation of New and Emerging Technologies for Textile Cleaning. Institute for Research and

Technical Assistance.

Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

Hero ID	5176441

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life Cycle Stage:	1) Spot Cleaning Exposure Model2) Dry Cleaning Exposure Model

Route of Exposure:	Provides data used in inhalation exposure models.

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X

1

1

CARB, CalEPA, and EPA funded project expected to use re-
liable data collection methods.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness

High
High
Medium

XXX

1

2
2

1

2
4

Data are based on U.S. dry cleaners (California).

Spot cleaning data are applicable to the scope of the model.

Report published in 2005; more than 10 but less than 20 years

Metric 5:

Sample Size

Low

X

1

3

Data characterized with no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

Low

X

1

3

Provides results but generally does not provide data sources,
methods, or assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Low

X

1

3

Generally does not discuss variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination^

Medium





1.9





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

44


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:

Type of Data Source
Hero ID

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life Cycle Stage:	Dry Cleaning Exposure Model

Route of Exposure:	Provides data to estimate 1-BP based spot cleaner use rate in inhalation

exposure model.

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X

1

1

State and academic research expected to use reliable data col-
lection methods.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High

Low

XXX X

1

2
2

1

1

2

2

3

Data are based on U.S. dry cleaners (New Jersey).

Spot cleaning data are applicable to the scope of the model.

Data collected from 2008 to 2009; less than 10 years old (from
2016).

Data characterized with no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

Medium

X

1

2

Sources are cited, but does not provide details on how reported
values were derived from cited sources.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Medium

X

1

2

Limited discussion of variability and uncertainty in results.

Overall Quality Determination^

High





1.4





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

45

Blando, J; Schill, D; De La Cruz, P; Zhang, L; Zhang, J. 2009. PERC ban among dry cleaners leads to 1-bromopropane
exposures with alternative "green" solvent.

Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

3045119


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:

Enviro Tech International. 2013. Drysolv spray testing & spotter. Material safety data sheet.

Type of Data Source

Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

Hero ID

3045693

EXTRACTION



Parameter

Data

Life Cycle Stage:	1) Spot Cleaning Exposure Model2) Dry Cleaning Exposure Model

Route of Exposure:	Provides 1-BP concentration in 1-BP based spot cleaner.

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X

1

1

Product manufacturer is expected to know the composition of
their products.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Low

X
X
X
X

1

2
2
1

1

2

2

3

Product available for sale in U.S.

Spot cleaning data are applicable to the scope of the model.
SDS issue date is 2013; less than 10 years old.

Data characterized with no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

High

X

1

1

All needed metadata are provided.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Medium

X

1

2

Range in concentration provided; unclear if this represents
variability or uncertainty in the concentration.

Overall Quality Determination^

High





1.3





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

46


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:	Eastern Research Group Inc.. 2005. [Letter from Eric Goehl and Jennifer O'Neil, Eastern Research group, Inc, to Dry Cleaning

Docket, Subject: Background information document].

Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

Hero ID	3045690

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life Cycle Stage:	Dry Cleaning Exposure Model

Route of Exposure:	Provides data used in inhalation exposure models.

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X

1

1

Data collected in support of EPA rulemaking.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
Medium
High

X
X
X
X

1

2
2
1

1

2
4
1

Data are based on U.S. dry cleaners.

Dry cleaning data are applicable to the scope of the model.
Data are more than 10 years old but less than 20 years old.
Individual data points provided.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

High

X

1

1

Report fully documents its data sources, assessment methods,
results, and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Medium

X

1

2

Limited discussion of variability and uncertainty in results.

Overall Quality Determination^

High





1.3





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

47


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:	Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. 2013. Alternative dry cleaning technologies comparative analysis

worksheet.

Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

Hero ID	3045045

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life Cycle Stage:	1) Spot Cleaning Exposure Model2) Dry Cleaning Exposure Model

Route of Exposure:	Provides data on 1-BP based spot cleaner for use in inhalation exposure

models.

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X

1

1

State and TURI expected to use reliable data collection meth-
ods.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Low

X
X
X
X

1

2
2
1

1

2

2

3

Data are based on U.S. dry cleaners.

Dry cleaning data are applicable to the scope of the model.
Worksheet published in 2013; less than 10 years old.

Data characterized with no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

Low

X

1

3

Provides results but generally does not provide data sources,
methods, or assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Low

X

1

3

Generally does not discuss variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination^

Medium





1.7





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

48


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:

Type of Data Source
Hero ID

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life Cycle Stage:	Dry Cleaning Exposure Model

Route of Exposure:	Cited for:l) Residual solvent on garments2) Duration of finishing/

pressing3) Size of machine cylinders

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X

1

1

Academic PhD dissertation expected to use reliable data col-
lection and analysis methods.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium

High

Medium

Medium

XXX X

1

2
2

1

2
2
4

2

Data based on German dry cleaners (OECD country).

Dry cleaning data are applicable to the scope of the model.

Dissertation published in 2003. More than 10 but less than 20
years old.

The various data elements used from the study are presented
mostly as ranges or averages.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

Medium

X

1

2

Sources are cited, but does not provide details on how reported
values were derived from cited sources.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Medium

X

1

2

Variability in parameter values discussed, but no discussion of
uncertainties.

Overall Quality Determination^

Medium





1.7





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

49

Von Grote, J. 2003. Occupational Exposure Assessment in Metal Degreasing and Dry Cleaning -Influences of Technology
Innovation and Legislation. A dissertation submitted to the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Z"rich for the degree of
Doctor of Natural Sciences. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Z"rich.

Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

5176439


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:	Von Grote, J.,J. C. Hurlimann,Scheringer, M.,Hungerbuhler, K.. 2003. Reduction of Occupational Exposure to Perchloroethy-

lene and Trichloroethylene in Metal Degreasing over the Last 30 years: Influence of Technology Innovation and Legislation.
Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

Hero ID	3045042

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life Cycle Stage:	Vapor and Cold Degreasing Exposure Models

Route of Exposure:	Cited for far-field volumes for inhalation exposure models.

EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating

MWF*

Score

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

X

1

1

Article is published in peer-reviewed scientific journal.

Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High

Medium

Medium

XX X X

1

2

2
1

2
2

4

2

Data based on German facilities (OECD country).

Degreasing facility data are applicable to the scope of the
model.

Work based on dissertation published in 2003. More than 10
but less than 20 years old.

The various data elements used from the study are presented
mostly as ranges or averages.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

Medium

X

1

2

Sources are cited, but does not provide details on how reported
values were derived from cited sources.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Medium

X

1

2

Variability in parameter values discussed, but no discussion of
uncertainties.

Overall Quality Determination^

Medium





1.7





* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

50


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Facility

51


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Source Citation:	U.S. EPA. 2017. Public database 2016 chemical data reporting (May 2017 release).

Type of Data Source Facility; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;
Hero ID	3827204

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life Cycle Stage:

Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):
Total Annual U.S. Volume (and percent of PV):

Number of Sites:

Possible Physical Form:

Chemical Concentration:

Manufacture and Import
Manufacture and Import

Provides U.S. domestic manufactured and imported PV and percent PV
to downstream uses.

Provides number of manufacturing and import sites.

Provides physical form.

Provides concentration.

EVALUATION

Domain	Metric	Rating MWF* Score	Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1: Methodology	High	x 1	1 EPA is a trusted source.

Domain 2: Representative

Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

High

X

1

1

CDR is U.S. based data.

Metric 3:

Applicability

High

X

2

2

CDR covers chemical manufacturers and importers, which are
in scope for all chemicals.

Metric 4:

Temporal Representativeness

High

X

2

2

EPA used data from the 2016 CDR, which includes data re-
ported for 2015.

Metric 5:

Sample Size

Medium

X

1

2

Due to reporting threshold, statistical representativeness is un-
clear.

Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness	Medium X 1	2 Submissions do not include method of how production volumes

were determined. CDR industry sector codes, industrial pro-
cessing and use codes, industrial function codes, and commer-
cial product codes provide good metadata; but lack of clari-
fying information and narratives and occasional misreportings
limit clarity of data.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness	Low	X 1	3 CDR data do not address variability or uncertainty in submit-

ter provided data.

Continued on next page

52


-------
PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

— continued from previous page

Source Citation:	U.S. EPA. 2017. Public database 2016 chemical data reporting (May 2017 release).

Type of Data Source Facility; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;

Hero ID	3827204

EVALUATION

Domain	Metric	Rating MWF* Score	Comments

Overall Quality Determination^	High	1.4

* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor

t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.

53


-------