United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4
^EDSX
p B \
Report
Post-Katrina NPL and Non-NPL Superfund Site Evaluations
Southern and Coastal Alabama and Mississippi
October 2005
Science and Ecosystem Support Division
980 College Station Road
Athens, GA 30605
Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality Alabama Department of Environmental Management
2380 Highway 80 West 1400 Coliseum Boulevard
Jackson Mississippi 39204 Montgomeiy, Alabama 36110
-------
TITLE AND APPROVAL SHEET
Title: Report, Post-Katrina NPL and Non-NPL Superfund Site
Evaluations, Southern and Coastal Alabama and Mississippi,
October 2005
The field investigation, sample collection and sample analysis reported herein is based on the Quality Assurance
Project Plan. Post-Katrina NPL Site Evaluations, Southern and Coastal Alabama and Mississippi, October 2005,
prepared according to:
EPA Requirements for Quality Assurance Project Plans (EPA QA/R5 EPA/24Q/B-01/003, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Information, Washington, DC, March 2001
(USEPA, 2001).
Management Approvals:
xSU JLj
/
y—
Don Hunter Date
Project Leader
Environmental Investigations Branch
t-z/zo I°
Scott Sudweeks Date
Chief
Technical Support Section
Superfund Repa€dial and Technical Services Branch
. / /
Randall Chaffins 7" /Dale
Acting Chief
rS^perfund Remedial and Technical Services Branch
\, \
\ j\ V*
Antonio Q^inones. Chief Date
Environmental Investigations Branch
-------
ACRONYMS
ADEM
Alabama Department of Environmental Management
ASB
Analytical Support Branch
ASBLOQAM
Analytical Support Branch Laboratory Operations and Quality
Assurance Manual
CERCLA
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
CLP
Contract Laboratory Program
COC
Contaminant of Concern
DQO
Data Quality Objective
EISOPQAM
Environmental Investigations Standard Operating Procedures and Quality
Assurance Manual
GPS
Global Positioning System
HSO
Health and Safety Officer
HWSA
Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments
IDW
Investigation Derived Waste
MDEQ
Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality
MS/MSD
Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate
NPDES
National Pollution Discharge Elimination System
NPL
National Priorities List
OSWER
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
PCB
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
PRG
Preliminary Remediation Goal (Region 9, EPA)
QAPP
Quality Assurance Project Plan
QA/QC
Quality Assurance/Quality Control
RPM
Remedial Project Manager
SAS
Special Analytical Services
SESD
Science and Ecosystem Support Division
SOW
Statement of Work
TIC
Tentatively Identified Compound
TSS
Technical Services Section, Region 4 Waste Management Division
USEPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
VOC
Volatile Organic Compound
11
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE AND APPROV AL SHEET i
ACRONYMS ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS iii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY v
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background/Site Location 1
1.2 Site Histories\Status Post Katrina 1
2.0 SAMPLING/DATA QUALITY OBJECTIV ES 5
2.1 Data Quality Objectives 5
2.1.1 Problem Statement 5
2.1.2 Identify the Decision(s) 6
2.1.3 Decision Inputs 6
2.1.4 Study Boundaries 6
2.1.5 Decision Rule 7
2.1.6 Error Limits 7
2.1.7 Optimize Sampling Design 7
3.0 INVESTIGATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 13
3.1 Field Project Responsibilities 13
3.2 Site Control and Access 13
3.3 Sample Collection and Handling Procedures 13
3.4 Sample Analysis and Validation 14
3.5 Chain of Custody 14
3.5.1 Sample Labels 15
3.5.2 Sample Custody Seals 15
3.5.3 Chain-of-Custody Record 15
3.6 Station and Sample Identification 15
3.7 Site Mapping 15
3.8 Investigation Derived Waste (IDW) 16
3.9 Sample Containers 16
4.0 SAMPLING DESIGN AND RATIONALE 17
4.1 Sampling Design 17
4.2 Data Validation/Usability 17
5.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE 18
5.1 Organization and Responsibilities 18
5.2 Field QA/QC Samples 18
5.2.1 Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate 18
in
-------
5.2.2 Population Variability - Duplicate Samples 18
5.2.3 Sample Handling - On-Site Splits 18
6.0 INVESTIGATION RESULTS 19
6.1 Olin-Mclntosh Plant (NPL) 19
6.2 Ciba Geigy (NPL) 20
6.3 Stauffer-Cold Creek (Syngenta) (NPL) 20
6.4 Stauffer-LeMoyne (Akzo Nobel) (NPL) 21
6.5 Perdido Groundwater Contamination (NPL) 21
6.6 Redwing Carriers (Saraland Apartments) (NPL) 22
6.7 American Creosote Works (NPL) 22
6.8 Sonford Products (Non-NPL) 22
6.9 Davis Timber (NPL) 24
6.10 Chemfax, Inc. (Non-NPL) 24
6.11 Picayune Wood Treating (NPL) 24
7.0 IMPACT EVALUATION 30
7.1 Olin-Mclntosh Plant, Mcintosh, Alabama (NPL) 30
7.2 Ciba Geigy, Mcintosh, Alabama (NPL) 31
7.3 Stauffer-Cold Creek (Syngenta), LeMoyne, Alabama (NPL) 32
7.4 Stauffer-LeMoyne Plant (Akzo Nobel), LeMoyne, Alabama (NPL) 32
7.5 Perdido Groundwater Contamination, Perdido, Alabama (NPL) 32
7.6 Redwing Carriers (Saraland Apartments), Saraland, Alabama (NPL) 33
7.7 American Creosote Works, Louisville, Mississippi (NPL) 33
7.8 Sonford Products, Flowood, Mississippi (Non-NPL) 34
7.9 Davis Timber, Hattiesburg, Mississippi (NPL) 35
7.10 Chemfax, Inc., Gulfport, Mississippi (Non-NPL) 35
7.11 Picayune Wood Treating, Picayune, Mississippi (NPL) 36
8.0 REFERENCES 37
Appendix A 38
Appendix B 51
Tables
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 6.1
Table 6.2
Table 6.3
Table 6.4
Sample Location, Description, Rationale and Analytes
Sample Containers, Sediment Samples
Sample Containers, Surface Water and Groundwater Samples
Extractable Organic Data Summary, Sediment Samples, American
Creosote Works
Extractable Organic Data Summary, Surface Water Samples,
American Creosote Works
Dioxin Analytical Data Summary, Sediments, Sonford Products
Dioxin Analytical Data Summary, Sediments, Davis Timber
iv
-------
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On August 29, 2005, Hurricane Katrina made landfall along the Gulf coast of the
southeastern United States, causing unprecedented damage from eastern Louisiana to near
Mobile, Alabama. During the period from October 12 through October 14, 2005, personnel from
the USEPA Region 4, Science and Ecosystem Support Division (SESD), Athens, Georgia,
collected sediment, surface water and groundwater samples in the vicinity of nine National
Priorities List (NPL) and two non-NPL Superfund sites in the potentially affected region to
determine if storm-related releases occurred or, in the case of sites with operating remedial
systems, make determinations as to the functionality of these systems. The locations of these
sites are shown and identified in Figures 1 and 2 in Appendix A of this report. Actual sample
locations are shown in Figures 3 through 12, also included in Appendix A. The analytical data
are presented in Section 6 of this report.
EPA's conclusions regarding the potential impact of the hurricane on these sites are
based on a comparison of post-hurricane data to existing soil and sediment clean-up values
defined for the site, or available past sample data collected during remedial investigations or
routine monitoring activities. In addition, the results were compared to EPA Region 9
Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRCs) and the Office of Water's 2004 National Recommended
Water Quality Criteria (NRWQC) to determine if conditions at the sites might represent
previously unrecognized risks to human health and the environment. EPA Region 9 PRCs
(available at: http://vvvvvv.epa.gov/region9/vvaste/sfund/prg/index.html) are risk-based
concentrations based on long-term (i.e., 30-year) exposures to children and adults in a residential
setting. The PRCs are intended to assist risk assessors and others in initial screening-level
evaluations of environmental measurements. EP A Office of Water's 2004 N RWQC- (available
at: http://vvvvvv.epa.gov/vvaterscience/criteria/vvqcriteria.html ) are a compilation of surface water
quality criteria for the protection of aquatic life and human health for approximately 150
pollutants. The impact evaluations are presented in Section 7 of this report.
The scope of the investigations at each site and the conclusions that were reached
regarding releases or impacts from Hurricane Katrina are presented in the following site
summaries. The NPL status is provided in the summary heading.
Olin-Mclntosh Plant (NPL) (Figure 3. Appendix A)
The Olin-Mclntosh plant is an active chemical facility that previously used mercury in its
processes. Surface water and sediment samples were collected at two locations at the Olin-
Mclntosh plant and were analyzed for mercury and volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
Total mercury was detected in one sediment sample at 0.58 mg/kg, which is consistent
with results obtained from the 1991 -1992 sampling for the remedial investigation conducted at
the site. 1,3-Dichlorobenzene was detected in the same sediment sample at 4 ug/kg. This level is
well below the 140 mg/kg cleanup level set for the site and the risk-based Preliminary
Remediation Goal (PRC) of 530 mg/kg. Mercury was detected in one surface water sample at a
concentration of 0.21 ug/1. The detected concentration is below the National Recommended
Water Quality Criteria (NRWQC) value of 0.77 ug/1, but above the State of Alabama standard
v
-------
for protection of aquatic life of 0.012 ug/1. This sample, however, was not taken in a permanent
body of water capable of sustaining aquatic life. Furthermore, the reported concentration is less
than concentrations of mercury previously detected in surface water samples at the site.
Reported concentrations of site-related contaminants of concern are consistent with
historical characterization data and no chemicals were found to exceed risk-based PRGs. Thus,
EPA does not believe the site was impacted by Hurricane Katrina.
Ciba Geigy (NPL) (Figure 4. Appendix A)
Ciba-Geigy is an active chemical facility which, in the past, produced the pesticide,
dichlorodiphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT). Sediment and surface water was sampled in the
vicinity of the Ciba-Geigy facility's permitted National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) outfall. Additionally, a sample of the on-site permitted wastewater effluent was also
collected. All samples were analyzed for diazinon and pesticide/PCB compounds.
The pesticide DDT, and its metabolites (i.e., breakdown products) DDD and DDE were
detected in the sediment sample at 3.3 ug/kg, 4.4 ug/kg, and 7.1 ug/kg, respectively. None of the
detected levels of DDT, DDD and DDE exceeded residential Preliminary Remediation Goals
(PRGs). Likewise, the reported levels for diazinon were below its residential PRG of 55,000
ug/kg.
Based on these sampling results, EPA does not believe the site was impacted by
Hurricane Katrina.
Stauffer-Cold Creek (NPL) (Figure 5. Appendix A)
The Stauffer-Cold Creek plant is an active chemical production facility, now owned and
operated by Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. Syngenta produces agricultural pesticide and
herbicides, including thiocarbamates; thus, samples were analyzed for a suite of thiocarbamate
herbicides, including Butylate (Sutan™), Molinate (Ordram™), Cycloate (Ro-Neet™), EPTC
(Eptam™), Pebulate (Tillam™) and Vernolate (Vernam™). Four sediment samples were
collected near the facility's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) outfalls
and were analyzed for six targeted thiocarbamate herbicides.
Five of the thiocarbamate herbicides were detected in three of the four samples. Detected
concentrations of the thiocarbamate herbicides were below available residential Preliminary
Remediation Goals (PRGs).
Based on these sampling results, EPA does not believe the site was impacted by
Hurricane Katrina.
vi
-------
Stauffer-LeMoyne (NPL) (Figure 5. Appendix A)
The Stauffer-LeMoyne plant is an active chemical production facility. Past production at
the plant included carbon tetrachloride, chlorine and caustic soda (sodium hydroxide). Two
sediment samples were collected near the facility's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) outfalls.
The samples were analyzed for total mercury, cyanide and volatile organic compounds
(VOCs). Total mercury was detected at 0.87 mg/kg, which is below the residential Preliminary
Remediation Goals (PRGs) for both total mercury (33 mg/kg) and methyl mercury (6.1 mg/kg).
Based on these sampling results, EPA does not believe the site was impacted by
Hurricane Katrina.
Perdido Groundwater Contamination (NPL) (Figure 6. Appendix A)
The Perdido Groundwater Contamination Site is a 15-acre site with benzene
contaminated groundwater caused by a 1965 train derailment. The remedy for the site includes a
groundwater extraction and treatment system.
Two water samples, one of untreated groundwater and one of treated
groundwater, were collected from the groundwater treatment system at the site. Both samples
were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs). No VOCs were detected in either sample.
Based on these sampling results, EPA does not believe the site was impacted by
Hurricane Katrina.
Redwing Carriers (Saraland Apartments) (NPL) (Figure 7. Appendix A)
From 1961 to 1971, Redwing Carriers, Inc., a trucking company, owned and operated the
Saraland site as a terminal for cleaning, repairing and parking its fleet of trucks. The chemicals
of concern for the site are polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon compounds (PAHs), pesticides,
herbicides and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Two sediment samples were collected from
ditches adjacent to and down gradient of the site.
Seven different PAHs were detected in the samples. The level of benzo[a]pyrene in one
sample (150 ug/kg) exceeded the residential Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG), but fell
within a risk range of 1 in 1,000,000 to 1 in 10,000 risk of an individual developing cancer over a
lifetime from exposure to those concentrations, which USEPA has found acceptable in other
contexts. The levels of the other PAHs detected, as well as the levels of Dieldrin and DDE,
were below residential PRGs.
Based on these sampling results, EPA does not believe the site was impacted by
Hurricane Katrina.
vii
-------
American Creosote Works (NPL) (Figure 8. Appendix A)
The American Creosote Works site is a former wood treating facility that operated from
1912 until the late 1990s. Surface water and sediment samples were collected from two
locations downstream of the site.
Numerous polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon compounds (PAHs), were detected in the
two sediment samples. The results are consistent with the results of previous samples collected at
the site. Five site-related PAH compounds were also detected in the surface water samples, but
all levels were less than 10 ug/1 and below National Recommended Water Quality Criteria
(NRWQC).
Based on the site history and the Remedial Project Manager's direct observations, the
contamination observed and documented by this evaluation existed prior to Hurricane Katrina.
There is, therefore, no indication that Hurricane Katrina had any adverse impact at the site.
Sonford Products (Non-NPL) (Figure 9, Appendix A)
From 1972 to 1975, Sonford Products and Sonford International operated at the site
producing liquid formulations from solid pentachlorophenol. Contaminants of concern include
pentachlorophenol, dioxin, arsenic, lead, toxaphene and lindane. This site is currently in
progress for NPL listing, and contamination will addressed through the remedial process.
Three sediment samples were collected and analyzed for metals, extractable organic
compounds, pesticide/PCBs and dioxins. Detections of lead in sediment samples were below
residential screening values, however arsenic and benzo(a)pyrene exceeded residential PRCs but
fell within a risk range of 1 in 1,000,000 to 1 in 10,000 risk over background of an individual
developing cancer over a lifetime from exposure to those concentrations, which EPA has found
acceptable in other contexts.
The dioxin/furan analyses for these three sediment samples showed that detected
concentrations were well within the range of reported levels from pre-hurricane sampling. Levels
of pentachlorophenol were below residential PRCs.
Based on these sampling results, EPA does not believe the site was impacted by
Hurricane Katrina.
Davis Timber (NPL) (Figure 10. Appendix A)
The Davis Timber Company site is a former timber processing and wood preserving
facility operated by the Davis Timber Company from 1972 to the late 1980's. Sediment samples
were collected at two locations downstream of the site and analyzed for semi-volatile organic
compounds (SVOCs), dioxins and furans.
Low levels of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon compounds (PAHs), dioxins/furans and
pentachlorophenol (PCP) were detected. The results are consistent with the results of previous
samples collected at the site in 2004.
viii
-------
Since there does not appear to be any significant change in concentrations of site-related
chemicals at the sampled locations, EPA does not believe the site was impacted by Hurricane
Katrina.
Chemfax. Inc. (Non-NPL) (Figure 11. Appendix A)
Chemfax, Inc. operated from 1955 to 1995 and produced synthetic hydrocarbon resins
and waxes from petroleum products.
Four sediment samples were collected across four transects of the Bernard Bayou at
locations likely to have been impacted by a release from site. Acetophenone was the only
extractable organic compound detected and was reported at a concentration of 96 ug/kg in one
sample. This concentration is well below residential PRC soil screening values. Acetone was the
only volatile organic compound identified in the four samples and was present at concentrations
less than 20 ug/kg. Detected concentrations were below residential PRCs.
There is no indication of an adverse impact due to a release from the Chemfax, Inc. site
associated with Hurricane Katrina. Reported concentrations are all below available risk-based
soil screening levels for these analytes.
Picayune Wood Treating (NPL) (Figure 12. Appendix A)
The Picayune Wood Treating site had been used as a wood treating operation from
approximately 1946 to 1999. Three sediment samples and one surface water sample were
collected in the vicinity of the site and analyzed for semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs)
including polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).
PAHs were detected in sediment samples but not in surface water. The levels of PAHs
detected in the sediment exceeded residential Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRCs) but fell
within a risk range of 1 in 1,000,000 to 1 in 10,000 risk of an individual developing cancer over a
lifetime from exposure to those concentrations, which EPA has found acceptable in other
contexts.
Based on these sampling results, EPA does not believe the site was impacted by
Hurricane Katrina.
IX
-------
1.0 INTRODUCTION
On August 29, 2005, Hurricane Katrina made landfall along the Gulf coast of the
southeastern United States, causing unprecedented damage from eastern Louisiana to near
Mobile, Alabama, due to the high winds and storm surge. During the period from October 12
through October 14, 2005, personnel from the USE PA Region 4, Science and Ecosystem Support
Division (SESD) collected sediment, surface water and groundwater samples in the vicinity of
nine National Priorities List (NPL) and two non-NPL Superfund sites in the potentially affected
region to determine if storm-related releases occurred or, in the case of sites with operating
remedial systems, make determinations as to the functionality of these systems. The
investigation was conducted according to the Quality Assurance Project Plan, Post-Katrina Site
Evaluations, Southern and Coastal Alabama and Mississippi, October 2005 and was requested by
the Alabama Department of Environmental Management ( ADEM ), the Mississippi Department
of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) and the USEPA, Region 4, Waste Management Division.
The Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) for the investigation was developed by the
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 4, in accordance with the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980,
as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA), of 1986 (EPA
1986). The EPA Guidance for Quality Assurance Project Plans (EPA QA/G-5, 1998) was
followed during the development of this Q APP.
1.1 Background/Site Location
The locations of the eleven sites that were evaluated for this study are shown in Figures 1
and 2. Figure 1 shows the locations of the south Alabama sites and Figure 2 shows the
locations of the sites in Mississippi.
1.2 Site Histories\Status Post Katrina
These facilities were selected because they are either located in areas where significant
widespread damage occurred or are located in areas further inland where there is a degree of
uncertainty regarding possible redistribution of known existing contamination in streams or
where possible damage to operational aspects of the sites may have occurred. The following
site histories and post-Katrina assessments have been provided by the responsible remedial
project managers (RPMs) from the Region 4 Waste Management Division. The NPL status is
provided in the heading of each site history.
Olin - Mcintosh Plant, Mcintosh, Alabama (NPL) (See Figure 3)
The Olin Corporation (Mcintosh Plant) NPL Site is located approximately one mile east
southeast of the town of Mcintosh. Mcintosh is located approximately 40 miles north of Mobile,
Alabama. The Mcintosh plant is an active chemical production facility. Olin produces chlorine,
caustic soda, sodium hypochlorite and blends and stores hydrazide compounds at the facility.
The plant occupies approximately 60 acres of the 1500 acres site.
1
-------
Ciba Geigy, Mcintosh, Alabama (NPL) (see Figure 4)
The Ciba-Geigy Corporation NPL Site is an active chemical facility that is located two
miles northeast of Mcintosh, Alabama, and encompasses approximately 1,500 acres. The
facility, formerly owned by Geigy Chemical Corporation, began operations in October 1952,
with the manufacture of one product, dichlorodiphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT). Ciba-Geigy
expanded its Mcintosh facilities by adding the production of fluorescent brighteners used in
laundry products; herbicides; insecticides; and agricultural chelating agents for industry.
Stauffer Chemical - Cold Creek Plant (Syngenta), LeMoyne, Alabama (NPL) (see Figure 5)
The Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek Plant) NPL Site is located approximately 25 miles
north of Mobile, Alabama. The site is located adjacent to the Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne
Plant) NPL Site and shares two common operable units with that site. The Cold Creek plant is
an active chemical production facility, now owned and operated by Syngenta Crop Protection,
Inc. Syngenta produces agricultural pesticide and herbicides, including thiocarbamates at the
site.
Stauffer Chemical - LeMoyne Plant (Akzo Nobel), LeMoyne, Alabama (NPL) (see FigureS)
The Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant) NPL Site is located approximately 25 miles
north of Mobile, Alabama. The LeMoyne plant is an active chemical production facility owned
by Akzo Nobel. Akzo Nobel produces multi-product organic and inorganic chemicals including
carbon disulfide, sulfuric acid and Crystex®, a proprietary sulfur compound. Past production at
the plant included carbon tetrachloride, chlorine and caustic soda (sodium hydroxide).
Perdido Groundwater Contamination, Perdido, Alabama (NPL) (see Figure 6)
The Perdido Groundwater Contamination NPL Site is a 15-acre site in the unincorporated
community of Perdido, Baldwin County, Alabama. Perdido is located approximately 45 miles
northeast of Mobile, Alabama. The site consists of a groundwater extraction and treatment
system constructed to remediate a benzene groundwater contamination plume caused by a 1965
train derailment.
Redwing Carriers (Saraland Apartments), Saraland, Alabama (NPL) (see Figure 7)
The Redwing Carriers, Inc. (Saraland) NPL Site is located in Saraland, Mobile County,
Alabama. Saraland is located approximately 12 miles north of Mobile, Alabama. The site is a
5.1 acre grass covered vacant lot. From 1961 to 1971, Redwing Carriers, Inc., a trucking
company, owned and operated the site as a terminal for cleaning, repairing and parking its fleet
of trucks. The firm transported a variety of substances, including asphalt, diesel fuel, chemicals
and pesticides from local plants. During cleaning, untreated hazardous substances were released
to the ground creating a tar-like sludge and contaminating site soils. The tar-like sludge is
2
-------
composed predominately of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon compounds together with lesser
amounts of pesticides, herbicides and volatile organic compounds.
American Creosote Works, Louisville, Mississippi (NPL) (see Figure 8)
The American Creosote Works NPL Site is a former wood treating facility located in
Louisville, Mississippi. The site operated from 1912 until the late 1990s. The site is
approximately 120 acres in size and is located in an industrial/commercial/residential area.
South Railroad Avenue borders the Site to the east. Hughes Creek borders the Site to the west.
Railroad Lake approximately 6.5 to 7.0 acres in area is located on the northern portion of the
Site. A residential neighborhood borders Railroad Lake to the west and north.
Sonford Products, Flowood, Mississippi (Non-NPL) (see Figure 9)
Sonford Products is a 6 acre facility located at 3506 Payne Drive, Flowood, Rankin
County, MS. From 1972 to 1975, Sonford Products and Sonford International operated at the
site producing liquid formulations from solid pentachlorophenol. Various solvents and lindane
were utilized. There is currently a small multi-family housing unit on-site with approximately 5
residents, including 2 children. Lacey's Digging Service also leases the site. Three Lacey
employees work on-site fabricating concrete and fiberglass septic system. Extensive EPA
sampling has shown high levels of contamination in soil, groundwater, surface water and
sediments. Contaminants include: pentachlorophenol, dioxins, arsenic, lead, toxaphene and
lindane.
Davis Timber, Hattiesburg, Mississippi (NPL) (see Figure 10)
The Davis Timber Company NPL Site is located on Jackson Road, approximately 6 miles
northwest of Hattiesburg, Lamar County, Mississippi. The Site is a former timber processing
and wood preserving facility, and was operated by the Davis Timber Company from 1972 to the
late 1980's. Although it is located in a rural area, residential areas are located near the Site.
Chemfax, Inc., Gulfport, Mississippi (Non-NPL) (see Figure 11)
The Chemfax, Inc. Site is located in Gulfport, Harrison County, Mississippi. It occupies
11 acres and is bordered by Three Rivers Road to the east and by Creosote Road to the south.
Located to the north is Bernard Bayou. The site is located within the southeast quadrant of the
interchange where Highway 49 meets Interstate 10. Chemfax, Inc. was established in March,
1955 and produced synthetic hydrocarbon resins and waxes from petroleum products. The
primary operation at the time business ceased in 1995 was a paraffin blending process in which
different grades of paraffin wax were heated together to a liquid state, then blended.
Picayune Wood Treating, Picayune, Mississippi (NPL) (see Figure 12)
The Picayune Wood Treating Site is located at 403 Davis Street on a 3 1,5-acre parcel of
land in Picayune, Pearl River County, Mississippi. Timber and lumber related operations began
3
-------
in the early 1900's, but the wood treating operation most likely began around 1946. The Crosby
Products Company pressure-treated yellow southern pine wood with preservative chemicals
(creosote). In 1973, Wood Treating, Inc. purchased the facility and continued to pressure-treat
wood until 1999. Residential, commercial, and industrial areas surround the Site.
4
-------
2.0 SAMPLING/DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES
2.1 Data Quality Objectives
The Data Quality Objectives (DQO) process for Superfund, in accordance with the
Guidance for the DQO Process (EPA QA/G-4, 2000), was implemented in developing the QAPP
for this investigation. DQOs are useful in identifying the study objectives and decisions to be
made and the criteria by which the data will be assessed. These data are then used for decision
making.
DQOs are established prior to data collection and integrated with the project planning
process so that sufficient data of known quality are collected to support sound decision making.
The seven steps in the DQO process are:
• Problem statement
• Identify the decisions
• Identify the inputs into the decision
• Define the boundaries of the study
• Develop decision rules
• Specify tolerable limits on decision errors
• Optimize the design for obtaining data
2.1.1 Problem Statement
The initial step in the DQO process is to clearly define the problem so that the focus of
the investigation will be clear. During the landfall of Hurricane Katrina, a massive storm surge
flooded extensive portions of Hancock, Harrison and Jackson Counties in the Gulf Coast of
Mississippi. In addition to the storm surge flooding and wind damage in the landfall area of
coastal Mississippi, additional flooding, due primarily to heavy rains, and lesser wind damage
occurred along the coastal areas of Alabama and in further inland areas of both states. Within
this potentially affected area are located the NPL and other Superfund sites in Section 1.2. Site
visits by Region 4 RPMs indicated that many of the sites, particularly those located further
inland, received little or no apparent damage. Although it is not thought that there were releases
from these sites, confirmatory sampling was conducted to determine if there were any significant
post-Katrina impacts, either from releases, re-distribution of contaminants or loss of functionality
of operating remedial systems. The problem is identifying whether or not releases have occurred
from the candidate sites, identifying whether existing, known environmental contamination
associated with the sites has been re-distributed and, where operating remedial systems are
present, determining that these systems are performing as designed and constructed.
5
-------
2.1.2 Identify the Decision(s)
The purpose of this DQO step is to identify the decisions that must be supported with the
collected data. They will help define the objectives of the field investigation. The first decision
is to determine if environmental conditions, with respect to established lists of COCs for each
site or facility, are significantly changed from historically established levels, due to either
releases or re-distribution of contaminants, warranting additional characterization and
assessment. Another decision is to determine if operating remedial systems require repair or
maintenance to restore them to design specifications and performance. To provide the
supporting data for this decision, SESD collected samples and photographed prescribed locations
at each facility/site. The analytical results for the samples collected for this investigation and the
observations made by each sample team are included in this report.
2.1.3 Decision Inputs
This step is used to identify the information needed to support the decisions. The
primary inputs needed to support the decision are sediment, surface water and groundwater
samples. All media were not sampled at each facility. Analytical results used in the decision
making process are definitive laboratory data, obtained from analysis by a contract laboratory
obtained through the EPA's Contract Laboratory Program (CLP lab) or a Special Analytical
Services (SAS) procurement. Samples from each facility or site were analyzed for a tailored list
of analytes based on the list of COCs provided by the RPM. Table 1 contains a list of the
facilities that were sampled, a description of the samples that were collected, the rationale
supporting selection of the sample and the analytes of concern for each sample.
Sediment and surface water samples were collected from ditches, streams or other surface
water conveyances in the vicinity of previously sampled locations for which there is historical
data, if available. Groundwater samples were collected directly from the groundwater treatment
system influent and effluent points at the Perdido Groundwater Contamination site. Figures 3 -
12, Appendix A show the locations that were sampled for this evaluation.
2.1.4 Study Boundaries
The purpose of this step is to identify the boundaries of the study. The primary media of
interest are sediments and surface water on or near the candidate facilities or sites. Groundwater
samples were collected at the Perdido Groundwater site only. The study boundaries are defined
below.
Study Area - The study area is the portions of coastal and southern Alabama and
Mississippi impacted by flooding and wind damage associated with Hurricane Katrina. Within
the larger study area are the selected facilities and sites. For each of the identified sites, the area
that was investigated consisted of sediments and surface water, if present, on or near the sites,
including ditches or storm water conveyances that may be present. For the operating facilities
(Olin, Ciba Geigy, Stauffer-Cold Creek and Stauffer-LeMoyne), NPDES compliance points have
6
-------
been designated by the RPM as sample locations for this evaluation. The exception to this study
area designation was the Perdido Groundwater Contamination site.
Sample Depth - Sediment samples were collected with a stainless steel scoop affixed to
a length of conduit or, if conditions allowed, stainless steel spoons. Samples collected with these
methods were generally comprised of sediment from the interval from the sediment surface to a
depth of about six inches. Surface water samples were collected by either collecting the sample
directly into the container while wading or by using a stainless steel scoop affixed to a length of
conduit, where wading was not possible. The surface water samples were generally comprised
of water within the top one foot of water column in the stream or conveyance.
Temporal Boundaries - The field investigation was conducted during the period of
October 12 through October 14, 2005. Seven day turnaround on the analytical results was
requested to expedite decision making.
2.1.5 Decision Rule
This report incorporates final released data. The Technical Services Section, in
consultation with the appropriate Waste Management Division personnel, has reviewed this data,
included in Section 6 of the report. Using this data and historical data and observations
provided by the RPMS, determinations were made for each site or facility as to whether or not
there appear to be significant changes in observed COC concentrations at the sampled locations.
2.1.6 Error Limits
Because of inherent variability introduced through sample collection, mixing, storage,
transportation, and analysis, it is important to specify the acceptable decision error rates.
Decision errors were reduced by using standard, published protocols for sampling and analytical
procedures. Sampling protocols followed the Region 4 Environmental Investigations Standard
Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance Manual. November 2001 (EISOPQAM) while
analytical procedures followed the current CLP SOW, the regional Special Analytical Services
SOW's for dioxins and, for the herbicide analyses, regionally approved methods.
2.1.7 Optimize Sampling Design
The final step in the DQO process is the development of a sampling design that takes into
account data needs, key decisions, and environmental variables, such as physical and site
constraints, and how the spatial and temporal boundaries of the contamination are identified.
The QAPP by which the investigation was conducted was developed based on input from site
RPMs. Each site was visited as soon as conditions allowed for travel in the affected areas.
Based on observations at each site, the responsible RPM has made recommendations as to the
scope of work needed to meet the investigation objectives.
7
-------
Samples were collected on an authoritative basis from locations in drainage pathways,
such as NPDES outfalls, ditches, creeks and streams. Sample locations are presented in Table 1
and Figures 3 through 12, Appendix A.
8
-------
Table 1
Sample Location, Description, Rationale and Analytes
Post-Katrina NPL and Non-NPL Superfund Site Evaluations
Southern and Gulf Coastal Alabama and Mississippi
Site
Sample ID
Location/Description
Type1
Rationale
Analytes2
Olin-Mclntosh
OMOISW
Surface water sample from
discharge point DSN003
G
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
A; D
OMOISD
Sediment sample from
discharge point DSN003
G
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
A; D
OM02SW
Surface water sample from
discharge point DSN004
G
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
A; D
OM02SD
Sediment sample from
discharge point DSN004
G
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
A; D
Stauffer-Lemoyne
(Akzo Nobel)
SL01SD
Sediment sample from
discharge point DSN004
G
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
A; D; E
SL02SD
Sediment sample from
discharge point DSN012
G
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
A; D; E
Stauffer-Cold Creek
(Syngenta)
SC01SD
Sediment sample from
discharge point DSN002
G
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
G
SC02SD
Sediment sample from
discharge point DSN003
G
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
G
SC03SD
Sediment sample from
discharge point DSN004
G
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
G
SC04SD
Sediment sample from
discharge point DSN005
G
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
G
Redwing Carriers
RC01SD
Sediment sample from
ditch upstream (west) of
southern border of site
G
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
B; C; H
RC02SD
Sediment sample from
ditch on south side of drive
from Hwy 43 back to site
(north of Rambo's
Skateland)
G
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
B; C; H
9
-------
Perdliclo GW
PG01GW
Influent to air stripper
G
Sample of groundwater, pre-treatment
A
PG02GW
Effluent from air stripper
G
Sample will be used to determine if air
stripper is functioning as designed
A
Picayune Wood
PW01SD
Sediment sample from Mill
G
Compare to historical data for impact
B
Treating
Creek downstream of site
(01SD)
evaluation
PW02SD
Sediment sample from site
boundary, Mill Creek
(02SD)
G
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
B
PW02SW
Surface water sample from
site boundary, Mill Creek
(02SW)
G
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
B
PW03SD
Sediment sample,
southwest corner of site,
Mill Creek (03SD)
G
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
B
Davis Timber
DT01SD
Sediment sample from
stream, downstream and
east of site (T02)
c
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
B; F
DT02SD
Far downstream sediment
sample from stream, west
of residential area and golf
course (SD11)
c
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
B; F
10
-------
American Creosote
AC01SW
Surface water sample
immediately upstream of
Baremore St.(SD07)
G
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
B
AC01SD
Sediment sample
immediately upstream of
Baremore St.(SD07)
G
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
B
AC02SW
Surface water sample
immediately upstream of
Hwy 15(SD09)
G
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
B
AC02SD
Surface water sample
immediately upstream of
Hwy 15(SD09)
G
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
B
Ciba Geigy
CG01SW
Surface water sample at
NPDES outfall at river
G
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
B
CGOISD
Sediment sample at NPDES
outfall at river
G
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
B
CG02SW
Wastewater sample from
permitted wastewater
discharge before pipe to
river outfall
G
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
B
Chemfax, Inc.
CFOISD
Bernard Bayou, 100 ft
upstream of railroad trestle;
three point composite
across channel (Rl station
number 222)
c
Control sample; Bernard Bayou is an
industrial channel; needed to properly
evaluate CF02SD, CF03SD and CF04SD;
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
A; B
CF02SD
Bernard Bayou,
immediately below railroad
trestle (Rl station number
223)
c
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
A; B
-------
CF03SD
Bernard Bayou,
immediately below Three
Rivers Road bridge (Rl
station number224)
C
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
A; B
CF04SD
Bernard Bayou, 150 feet
below Three Rivers Road
bridge (Rl station number
225)
C
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
A; B
Sonford Products
SP01SW
Surface water sample, ditch
downstream from site
(04SW)
G
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
B; D
SP01SD
Sediment sample, ditch
downstream from site
(04SD)
G
Compare to historical data for impact
evaluation
B; D, F
SP02SD
Sediment sample
downstream from SP01
G
Compare to SP01SD to evaluate impact
B; D, F
SP03SD
Sediment sample
downstream from SP02
G
Compare to SP01SD to evaluate impact
B; D, F
Notes:
1 - C is composite sample; G is grab sample
2 - Analytes: A - Volatile Organic Compounds F - Dioxin
B - Extractable Organic Compounds G - Carbamate herbicides
C - Pesticides/PCBs H - Herbicides
D - Metals
E - Cyanide
12
-------
3.0 INVESTIGATION MANAGEMENT PLAN
3.1 Field Project Responsibilities
The overall project lead was the responsibility of Don Hunter, SESD. Athens, Georgia.
Mr. Hunter was responsible for the following field activities:
• Ensuring that all field activities were conducted in accordance with the project QAPP.
• Monitoring overall field project quality control.
• Coordinating field scheduling of work with other Section and Division activities.
• Overseeing and managing field technical resources including non-sampling field
activities.
• Coordinating sample analyses with the laboratories.
The site Health and Safety Officer (HSO), Art Masters, was responsible for monitoring
the health and safety of the sampling/investigative personnel.
The following is a list of the personnel that were involved in the field operations for the
Katrina Response NPL Site evaluations and their responsibilities:
• Stacey Box, Field Team Leader, Sampler
• Art Masters, HSO, Field Team Leader, Sampler
• Brian Striggow, Field Team Leader, Sampler
• Marty Allen, Sampler
• Mike Crowe, ESAT Contract Support for Sample Processing and Shipment
• Brian Herndon, ESAT Contract Support for Sample Processing and Shipment
All field investigators had the required 40 hours of hazardous waste site safety training,
and specific knowledge and expertise of sample collection and safety techniques in accordance
with the Region 4 EISOPQAM.
3.2 Site Control and Access
Access for 01 in, Stauffer-Lemoyne, Stauffer-Cold Creek, Perdido Groundwater
Contamination, Redwing Carriers and Ciba Geigy were arranged by the RPM for each of the
sites. All other sites were either public access or were EPA Fund-Lead sites and formal access
was not required.
3.3 Sample Collection and Handling Procedures
All samples were collected, containerized, preserved, handled, and documented in
accordance with the Region 4 Environmental Investigations Standard Operating Procedures and
Quality Assurance Manual, November 2001 (EISOPQAM). All deviations from the QAPP,
13
-------
with respect to sample collection and handling, were discussed with the Project Leader and were
documented in the field records for the investigation.
Sediment samples were collected at the selected locations using stainless steel scoops
and/or stainless steel spoons. The sampled depths varied between several inches to up to 6 to 8
inches. Sediment samples were collected as grab samples except for two sites, the Chemfax and
Davis Timber site, where composite samples were collected. Three-point composites, at quarter-
points across the Bernard Bayou, were collected at the Chemfax, Inc. site. At the Davis Timber
site, three-point composites were collected at the accessible locations from the bank.
Sediment samples were collected, as described in Section 2.1.3 and Section 2.1.4,
Where composite samples were collected, the aliquots were thoroughly mixed in glass pans.
Samples for volatile organic compound analyses, where targeted, were collected prior to mixing,
with minimum disturbance, from the central aliquot in Encore® sample containers using EPA
Method 5035. After mixing, the samples were placed in the appropriate containers and placed
on ice, as specified in Appendix A of the Region 4 EISOPQAM.
Surface water samples were collected either directly into the sample containers from the
bank or while wading or were collected in stainless steel scoops and transferred to the sample
containers.
3.4 Sample Analysis and Validation
Samples from each site were analyzed for the analytes or constituents listed in Table 1.
One hundred percent completion was achieved with respect to analysis of samples collected for
this investigation. Using sampling and analytical procedures as outlined in the Region 4
EISOPQAM and the Region 4 ASBLOQAM, errors introduced in the decision making process
were minimized.
3.5 Chain of Custody
All chain-of-custody and record keeping procedures were in accordance with the
EISOPQAM. Chain-of-custody procedures are comprised of the following elements; 1)
maintaining sample custody and 2) documentation of samples for evidence.
As defined in the EISOPQAM, a sample or other physical evidence is in custody if:
• it is in the actual possession of an investigator;
• it is in the view of an investigator, after being in their physical possession;
• it was in the physical possession of an investigator and then it was secured to prevent
tampering; and/or
• it is placed in a designated secure area.
14
-------
3.5.1 Sample Labels
Sample labels were prepared and affixed to each sample container. The labels were
prepared using waterproof, non-erasable ink as specified in Section 3 of the EISOPQAM.
3.5.2 Sample Custody Seals
The samples were sealed as soon as possible following collection as specified in the
EISOPQAM. The custody seals were dated and initialed by the sample custodian.
3.5.3 Chain-of-Custody Record
A field Chain-Of-Custody Record was used to record the collection and custody of all
samples collected for this investigation. These records accompanied the samples during their
shipment to the laboratories, allowing transfer of custody of samples from the sampler/sample
custodian to the designated sample custodian at each laboratory.
3.6 Station and Sample Identification
Sample identification numbers were assigned using the following format:
XX##YYZ, where:
• XX is a unique identifier for the facility or site (see Table 1);
• ## indicates a sequential number assigned to each site;
• YY indicates the media being sampled: "SD" is sediment, "SW" is surface water
and "GW" is groundwater;
• Z identifies splits: "S" is split;
A split sample is a sample comprised of two samples, the primary sample and the
designated split sample, that are collected from the same sample material that has been
homogenized in a glass pan prior to filling of the sample containers. Assuming a well mixed
sample, a split helps evaluate both the field and laboratory procedures.
3.7 Site Mapping
The locations of all samples were logged using a GPS capable of one meter accuracy.
For composite sample locations, only the center aliquot was located. Shape files for these
locations were used to generate the sample location figures included in Appendix A.
15
-------
3.8 Investigation Derived Waste (IDW)
The following identifies types of investigation derived waste (IDW) that was generated
during the investigation and their disposition:
• Gloves, paper towels, aluminum foil and plastic wrapping from the sampling
equipment and other miscellaneous trash generated during the investigation was
bagged and placed in a dumpster for disposal at a Class D landfill
3.9 Sample Containers
Sample containers for samples were obtained from the SESD Field Equipment Center in
Athens, Georgia. These containers comply with the requirements specified in Appendix A of the
EISOPQAM. Tables 2 and 3 lists the container types and numbers used for each analyte group,
by media. Containers listed in split column are in addition to the containers comprising the
regular sample. Containers listed in the MS/MSD column are total containers for the regular
sample designated as the MS/MSD sample.
Table 2, Sample Containers, Sediment
Samples
Analytes
Containers
Splits
MS/MSD
Holding Times
Metals/Cyanide
1 8oz. glass
1 8oz. glass
2 8oz. glass
180 days
VOCs
3 EnCore™
3 EnCore™
9 EnCore™
48 hours
Semi-Volatiles,
Pesticides/PCBs
1 8oz. glass
1 8oz. glass
2 8 oz. glass
14 days
Herbicides
1 8oz. glass
1 8oz. glass
1 8oz. glass
14 days
Dioxins
1 8oz. glass
1 8oz. glass
N/A
30 days
Table 3, Sample Containers, Surface Water and Groundwater Samples
Analytes
Containers
Splits
MS/MSD
Holding Times
Metals
1 1 -liter
plastic
1 1 -liter
plastic
2 1 -liter
plastic
180 days
Cyanide
1 1 -liter
plastic
1 1 -liter
plastic
2 1 -liter
plastic
28 days
VOCs
2 40-mil
VOA vials
2 40-mil
VOA vials
6 40-mil
VOA vials
14 days
Semi-Volatiles,
Pesticides/PCBs
4 1 -liter
amber
4 1 -liter
amber
8 1 -liter
amber
14 days
Herbicides
2 1 -liter
amber
2 1 -liter
amber
6 1 -liter
amber
14 days
16
-------
4.0 SAMPLING DESIGN AND RATIONALE
Sediment, surface water and groundwater samples were collected during this field
investigation. Analysis of these samples will aid in determining if site conditions have changed
from what has been historically determined (see Section 2.1.5), Additionally, sample results
were used to determine if the groundwater treatment system at the Perdido Groundwater
Contamination site is operating as designed.
4.1 Sampling Design
Eleven Superfund sites, nine NPL and two non-NPL, were targeted for this evaluation.
The scope of work varied for each site and is based on an assessment of site conditions
determined by the RPM for each site during immediate post-Katrina site visits. Except for the
Perdido Groundwater Contamination site, where only groundwater samples from the treatment
system were collected, the scope of work at each site generally consisted of the collection of two
to four sediment and surface water samples (where surface water was present) from existing
monitoring locations, including permitted NPDES discharge points. To the extent possible, these
samples were collected from locations previously sampled during remedial investigations or
other characterization activities.
4.2 Data Validation/Usability
The data generated from the split and duplicate samples was validated in accordance with
the Region 4 Analytical Support Branch Laboratory Operations and Quality Assurance Manual,
November 2004 (ASBLOQAM).
Analyses for metals, cyanide, VOCs, semi-volatiles, pesticides and PCBs were performed
by CLP laboratories. This data was validated according to the National Functional Guidelines
for Organic Data Review, OSWER 9240.1-05-A-P (October 1999), the National Functional
Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review, OSWER 9240.1-45 (October 2004) and Region 4's Data
Validation Standard Operating Procedures for Contract Laboratory Program Routine Analytical
Services, Revision 2.0 (January 1999).
The dioxin/furan, herbicide and carbamate analysis were performed by laboratories
contracted by EP A. Validation of the dioxin data was performed by ES AT using the National
Functional Guidelines for Dioxin Data Review, OSWER540-R-02-003 (August 2002) and
Region 4's Data Validation Standard Operating Procedures for Dioxin Data Version 3.0 (May
2002) documents. The dioxin data will consist of a Level 4 - CLP type data package that
contains the C-O-Cs, instrument raw data, initial and/or continuing calibration data/curves, bench
sheets/sample preparation information, QA/QC data/information, and case narrative detailing
any problems associated with this data.
Data for herbicides and thiocarbamate herbicides was reviewed and validated against the
standard operating procedures and quality management plan requirements of the performing
laboratory. Data qualification decisions were made in accordance with the National Functional
Guidelines for Organic Data Review.
17
-------
5.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE
Quality assurance (QA) procedures must begin in the planning stage and continue
through sample collection, analyses, reporting and final review. The methods that were used to
ensure data quality are discussed below.
5.1 Organization and Responsibilities
The project leader has overall responsibility for field QA. Off-site laboratory analyses
for samples collected during the investigation were conducted by the CLP laboratories under the
current CLP Statement of Work. The precision, comparability and accuracy of sample analyses
were determined in accordance with the ASBLOQAM.
5.2 Field QA/QC Samples
5.2.1 Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate
Samples for laboratory quality control analyses (matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate, or
MS/MSD) were designated as specified in the EISOPQAM. Because each site was booked
separately for analyses, one MS/MSD sample was designated for each site
5.2.2 Population Variability - Duplicate Samples
Because of the small number of samples to be collected at each site, the media that are
being collected and the nature of the investigation, variability duplicates were deemed as not
appropriate or warranted for this investigation. No duplicates, therefore, were collected for this
investigation.
5.2.3 Sample Handling - On-Site Splits
Four splits were collected, one each at four of the eleven sites/facilities sampled for this
investigation. These samples, collected at fifteen percent of the sample locations, were used to
assess sample handling variability. This number exceeds the 10 percent specified in the QAPP.
The split sample results for the four split samples are included in the data presentation in Section
6 and are included as part of the data in the complete data appended to this report. The split
sample results were generally consistent at each of the split sample locations and were within
anticipated limits for the media sampled.
18
-------
6.0 INVESTIGATION RESULTS
The following sections summarize the results of analysis of samples collected at the
eleven facilities or sites selected for the Post-Katrina NPL and Non-NPL Superfund site
evaluations. Figures 3 through 12, contained in Appendix A of this document, show the
locations of these samples. Analytical data summaries, based on a summary of detected analytes
or compounds, are provided below and at the end of this section for each facility. The complete
data, included in Appendix B of this report, contain the detected compounds as well as those
analyzed for but not detected, with the minimum quantitation limits, i.e., reporting limits, for the
undetected compounds and analytes.
The following is a list of data qualifiers used in the analytical data summaries
accompanying the presentation of the investigation results.
J Identification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate.
N Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative
identification.
NJ Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative
identification. Reported value is an estimate.
C Confirmed by GC/MS
A Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average " of replicates
U Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit.
UJ Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
R Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe
quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
NR Not reported.
6.1 Olin-Mclntosh Plant (NPL)
Sediment and surface water samples were collected at two locations, OMOl and OM02,
shown on Figure 3, and were analyzed for volatile organic compounds and mercury. The results
are summarized below.
Mercury, Sediments:
Analyte Units OMOISD QM02SD
Mercury mg/kg 0,82 U 0.58
Mercury, Surface Water:
Analyte Units OMOISW QM02SW
Mercury ug/1 0.20 11 0.21
Volatile Organic Compounds, Sediment:
Analyte Units OMOISD QM02SI)
1,3-dichlorobenzene ug/kg 16 U 4 J
Petroleum Product ug/kg N NR
Unknown ug/kg 13 J NR
19
-------
Volatile Organic Compounds, Surface Water: No volatile organic compounds were
detected in either of the surface water samples collected for the Olin-Mclntosh Plant evaluation.
6.2 Ciba Geigy (NPL)
A sediment and surface water sample was collected at location CG01, shown on Figure 4.
In addition, a sample of the facility's permitted wastewater discharge was collected from a point
within the plant boundaries. This point, identified as CG02SW, is also shown on Figure 4.
Samples from both locations were analyzed for pesticides/PCBs and diazinon. Samples
CG01 SDS and CGO1 SWS are the split samples from station CGO1. The results are summarized
below:
Diazinon, Sediment:
Analyte Units CG01SD CG01SDS
Diazinon ug/kg 1300 UR 1300 UR
Diazinon, Surface Water (01SW) and Wastewater (02SW):
Analyte Units CG01SW CG01SWS CG02SW
Diazinon ug/1 0.62 UR (162 UR 4.2 NJ
Pesticide/PCB Compounds, Sediment:
Analyte
Units
CGO I SI)
CGO I SDS
4,4,4'-DDD
ug/kg
4.4 J
5.0
4,4,4'-DDE
ug/kg
7.1
6.8
4,4,4-DDT
ug/kg
3.3 J
20
Pesticide/PCB Compounds, Surface Water (01 SW) and W astewater (02SW):
Analyte Units CG01SW CGO J SWS CG02SW
Delta-BHC ug/1 0.050 U 0.050 U 0.045 J
A1 drin ug/1 0.050 U 0.050 U 1.0
6.3 Stauffer-Cold Creek (Syngenta) (NPL)
Four sediment samples were collected at the locations shown on Figure 5. Because no
water was present at the time of sampling, surface water samples, which were planned at these
locations, were not collected. All samples were analyzed for a suite of thiocarbamate herbicides,
including Butyl ate (Sutan™), Molinate (Ordram™), Cycloate (Ro-Neet™), EPTC (Eptam™),
Pebulate (Tillam™) and Vernolate (Vernam™).
20
-------
The following is an analytical data summary of the thiocarbamate herbicides detected in
the four samples:
Thiocarbamate Herbicides, Sediment:
Analvte
Units
sco i si)
SC02SD
SC03SD
SC04SD
Vernolate
ug/kg
1000 UR
650 CJ
670 CJ
630 UR
EPTC
ug/kg
1000 u
1500 C
1300 C
300 CJA
Cycloate
ug/kg
1000 u
1300 C
630 CJ
1000 u
Butyl ate
ug/kg
1000 u
2600 C
6800 C
1400 CJA
Pebulate
ug/kg
1 ooou
340 CJ
290 CJ
1000 u
Molinate
ug/kg
R
R
R
R
6.4 Stauffer-LeMoyne (Akzo Nobel) (NPL)
Sediment samples were collected from two locations, SLO1 and SL02, shown on Figure
5. Because no water was present at the time of sampling, surface water samples, which were
planned at these locations, were not collected. The samples were analyzed for total mercury,
cyanide and volatile organic compounds. The results are summarized below.
Mercury and Cyanide, Sediment:
Analyte Units SI.01SI) SL02SD
Total Mercury mg/kg 0.87 J 0.60 UJ
Cyanide mg/kg 1.61J 1.5 U
Volatile Organic Compounds, Sediment:
Analvte
Units
S1.01S1)
SL02SD
Acetone
ug/kg
12 U
47 J
Toluene
ug/kg
12 U
20
Dimethyl sulfide
ug/kg
12 U
12 NJ
Petroleum Product
ug/kg
N
N
Unknown
ug/kg
NR
7 J
3 Unknowns
ug/kg
38 J
NR
6.5 Perdido Groundwater Contamination (NPL)
Two water samples, PGO1 and PG02, were collected from the groundwater treatment
system influent and effluent lines, respectively, at the Perdido Groundwater Contamination
groundwater treatment system, the location of which is shown on Figure 6. Both samples were
analyzed for volatile organic compounds. No volatile organic compounds were detected in either
of the samples.
21
-------
6.6 Redwing Carriers (Saraland Apartments)(NPL)
Two sediment samples were collected from ditches adjacent to the Redwing Carriers site.
The locations are shown on Figure 7. Because no water was present at the time of sampling,
surface water samples, which were planned, were not collected at these locations. The samples
were analyzed for extractable organic compounds, pesticides/PCBs and the herbicide Vernolate
(Vernam™). The following are analytical data summaries of the extractable organic compound
and pesticide/PCB compound analyses for these samples. No Vernalate was detected in either
sample with reporting limits of 980UR ug/kg and 700UR ug/kg, for samples RCO1 SD and
RC02SD, respectively.
Extractable Organic Compounds, Sediment:
Analvte
Units
RC01SD
RC02SD
Benzo( a )fl uoranthene
ug/kg
150 J
490 UR
B enzo(b )fl uoranthene
ug/kg
260 J
1 10
Benzo(k)fl uoranthene
ug/kg
290 J
100
Benzo-a-pyrene
ug/kg
150 J
490 U
Chrysene
ug/kg
310 J
100 J
F1 uoranthene
ug/kg
310 J
130 J
Pyrene
ug/kg
410 J
130 J
Pesticide/PCB Compounds, Sediment:
Analvte
Units
RC01SD
RC02SD
4,4,4'-DDE ug/kg 2.3 J 4.9 U
Di el drin ug/kg 4.1 J 2.1 NJ
Gamma-chlordane 12 ug/kg 9.1 2,5 U
6.7 American Creosote Works (NPL)
Surface water and sediment samples were collected from two locations, A CO 1 and AC02,
as shown on Figure 8, and were analyzed for extractable organic compounds. The extractable
organic compound analytical data summary tables are included as Table 6.1 (sediment summary)
and Table 6.2 (surface water summary) at the end of Section 6. Samples ACO1SDS and
ACO1SWS are the split samples of sediment and surface water collected at location ACO 1.
Numerous miscellaneous extractable organic compounds (TICs) were detected in these samples
and the results are included with the complete data appended to this report.
6.8 Sonford Products (Non-NPL)
Sediment samples were collected at three locations, SP01, SP02 and SP03, as shown on
Figure 9. In addition to the sediment sample collected at location SPO1, a surface water sample
was also collected at that location. All samples were analyzed for metals, extractable organic
compounds, pesticide/PCBs and dioxins, except for the surface water sample, which was not
22
-------
analyzed for dioxins. The metals results, for both sediment and surface water samples, are
summarized below. Also summarized are the extractable organic compound and pesticide/PCB
sediment results. Numerous miscellaneous extractable organic compounds (TICs) were reported
and are included with the complete data appended to the report but are not summarized below.
No pesticide/PCB compounds and only trace detections of miscellaneous extractable organic
compounds (TICs) were reported for the surface water sample. These results are also included in
the complete data appended to the report. The dioxin results are summarized in Table 6.3 at the
end of Section 6.
Lead and Arsenic, Sediment:
Analvte Units S/'OISD SP02SD SP03SD
Lead mg/kg
20
150
62
Arsenic mg/kg
1.4 J
4.1
2.9
Lead and Arsenic, Surface Water:
Analvte Units
SP01SW
Lead ug/1
9.3 J
Arsenic ug/1
10 U
Extractable Organic Compounds, Sediment:
Analvte
Units
SP01SD
SP02SD
SP03SD
B enzo(b Jfluoranthene
ug/kg
490 U
380 J
490 U
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
ug/kg
490 U
330 J
490 U
Benzo-a-pyrene
ug/kg
490 U
240 J
490 U
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
ug/kg
490 U
340 J
490 U
Chrysene
ug/kg
490 U
310 J
490 U
Fluoranthene
ug/kg
490 (I
350 J
490 (I
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
ug/kg
490 U
230 J
490 U
Pentachlorophenol
ug/kg
1200 U
260011
1200 U
Pyrene
ug/kg
490 U
390 J
490 U
Pesticide/PCB Compounds, Sediment:
Analvte
Units
SP01SD
SP02SD
SP03SD
Beta-BHC
ug/kg
1.6 NJ
9.8
2 J U
Delta-BHC
ug/kg
1.2 J
1 1
2 J U
Gamma-BHC (Lindane)
ug/kg
2.5 U
3 NJ
2 J V
Dieldrin
ug/kg
1.3 J
18
2.2 J
4,4,4'-DDE
ug/kg
4.9 11
10 J
1.2 NJ
Alpha-Chlordane /2
ug/kg
25 U
2.4 J
2.5 U
23
-------
6.9 Davis Timber (NPL)
Sediment samples were collected at two locations, DT01 and DT02, as shown on Figure
10. Because of dry conditions, surface water samples, which were planned, were not collected at
these locations. Both samples were analyzed for extractable organic compounds and dioxins.
Sample DT01 SDS is the split sample at station DT01 SD. The extractable organic analytical
results are summarized below. The miscellaneous extractable organic compound (TIC) data are
not summarized but can be found in the complete data appended to this report. The dioxin
results are summarized in Table 6.4 at the end of Section 6.
Extractable Organic Compounds, Sediment:
Analvte
Units
1)101 SI)
1)101 SDS
/) TO 2 SI)
Pentachlorophenol
ug/kg
880
450 J
940 U
Chrysene
ug/kg
84 J
75 J
380 U
Fluoranthene
ug/kg
80 J
340 U
380 U
Pyrene
ug/kg
78 J
76 J
380 U
6.10 Chemfax, Inc. (Non-NPL)
Sediment samples were collected at four locations in Bernard Bayou, as shown on Figure
11. All samples were analyzed for volatile and extractable organic compounds. Sample
CF04SDS is the split of the sample collected at location CF04SD.
Extractable Organic Compounds, Sediment:
Acetophenone, detected at an estimated concentration of 96 ug/kg, in sample CF04SD,
was the only extractable organic compound detected in the samples collected at this site. Several
miscellaneous extractable compounds (TICs) and unknown compounds were detected at
generally low concentrations in samples from each of the four stations. These results are
included in the complete data appended to the report. The VOC results are summarized below.
Volatile Organic Compounds, Sediment:
Analvte Units CF01SD CF02SD CF03SD CF04SD CF04SDS
Acetone ug/kg 19 J 12 J 11 (JJ 10 J 11 J
Unknown ug/kg 6 J 6 J 8 J 6 J 8 J
6.11 Picayune Wood Treating (NPL)
Sediment samples were collected at three locations, PWO1, PW02 and PW03, as shown
on Figure 12. In addition, a surface water sample was also collected at location PW02. All
samples were analyzed for extractable organic compounds. The analytical results are
24
-------
summarized below. No extractable organic compounds were detected in the water sample
collected at station PW02.
Extractable Organic Compounds, Sediment:
Analvte
Units
PW01SD
PW02SD
P W0 3 SI)
Anthracene
ug/kg
580 U
280 J
140 J
Benzo(a)anthracene
ug/kg
280 J
420 J
130 J
B enzo(b )fluoranthene
ug/kg
600
1000
310 J
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
ug/kg
410 J
780
160 J
B enzo(ghi)p eryl ene
ug/kg
380 J
470 J
180 J
Benzo-a-pyrene
ug/kg
410 J
660 J
170 J
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
ug/kg
990
1600
460 J
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
ug/kg
580 (J
180 J
520 U
Chrysene
ug/kg
520 J
890
270 J
Fluoranthene
ug/kg
870
1300
380 J
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
ug/kg
430 J
580 J
190 J
Phenanthrene
ug/kg
290 J
390 J
120 J
Pyrene
ug/kg
650
1100
340 J
25
-------
Table 6.1
Extractable Organic Data Summary, Sediment Samples
American Creosote Works
Post-Katrina NPL and Non-NPL Superfund Site
Evaluations
AC01SD
AC01SDS
AC02SD
1,1 -Biphenyl
UG/KG
64000
64000
1400
v
2,4-Dimethylp henol
UG/KG
2500
J
2700
J
1400
u
2-Methylnaphthalene
UG/KG
350000
400000
1400
u
Acenaphthene
UG/KG
330000
380000
560
J
Acenaphthylene
UG/KG
22000
22000
4700
Acetophenone
UG/KG
3400
J
4300
J
1400
v
Anthracene
UG/KG
140000
150000
3800
Benzo( a) Anthracene
UG/KG
83000
86000
14000
B enzo(b )Fluoranthene
UG/KG
36000
35000
15000
Benzo(ghi)Perylene
UG/KG
11000
J
10000
J
4200
J
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
UG/KG
33000
38000
17000
Benzo-a-Pyrene
UG/KG
34000
35000
16000
Carbazole
UG/KG
66000
J
63000
J
1400
v
Chrysene
UG/KG
77000
76000
17000
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
UG/KG
5900
J
5200
J
3600
Dibenzofuran
UG/KG
270000
290000
380
J
Fluoranthene
UG/KG
440000
480000
16000
Fluorene
UG/KG
340000
380000
760
J
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
UG/KG
15000
13000
11000
J
Naphthalene
UG/KG
1300000
1400000
380
J
Phenanthrene
UG/KG
960000
1000000
3600
Pyrene
UG/KG
250000
280000
16000
Data Qualifiers
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit.
J-Identification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate.
26
-------
Table 6.2
Extractable Organic Data Summary, Surface Water Samples
American Creosote Works
Post-Katrina NPL and Non-NPL Superfund
Site Evaluations
AC 01 SW
AC01SWS
AC02SW
2,4-Dimethylp henol
UG/L
3
J
7
J
10
u
Acenaphthene
UG/L
3
J
4
J
10
u
Chrysene
UG/L
10
v
10
V
3
J
Fluoranthene
UG/L
6
J
4
J
3
J
Pyrene
UG/L
3
J
2
J
10
v
Data Qualifiers
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit.
J-Identification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate.
27
-------
Tabic 6.3
Dioxin Analytical Data Summary, Sediments
Sonford Products Superfund Site
Post-katrina NPL and Non-NPL Superfund Site Evaluations
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodib enzodioxin N G/KG
1.2.3.4.6.7.8-Heptachlorodib en/ofuran N G/KG
1.2.3.4.7.8.9-Heptachlorodib en/ofuran N G/KG
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin NG/KG
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran NG/KG
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin NG/KG
1.2.3.6.7.8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran NG/KG
1.2.3.7.8.9-Hexachlorodib en/odioxin N G/KG
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodib en/ofuran N G/KG
1,2,3.7.8-Pentachlorodiben/odioxin NG/KG
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran NG/KG
2,3,4,6,7,8-Hexachlorodib en/ofuran N G/KG
2,3,4,7,8-Pentachlorodib en/ofuran N G/KG
2,3,7,8-T etrachlorodib en/odioxin N G/KG
2,3,7,8-T etrachlorodib en/ofuran N G/KG
Heptachlorodiben/odioxin (Total) NG/KG
Heptachlorodiben/ofuran (Total) NG/KG
Hexachlorodiben/odioxin (Total) NG/KG
Hexachlorodiben/ofuran (Total) NG/KG
Octachlorodiben/odioxin NG/KG
Octachlorodiben/ofuran NG/KG
Pentachlorodiben/odioxin (Total) NG/KG
Pentachlorodiben/ofuran (Total) NG/KG
Tetrachlorodiben/odioxin (Total) NG/KG
Tetrachlorodiben/ofuran (Total) NG/KG
TEQ (Avian Toxic. Equiv. Value, From WHO TEQ-98) NG/KG
TEQ (Fish Toxic. Equiv. Value, From WHO TEQ-98) NG/KG
TEQ (Mammalian Toxic. Equiv. Value, From WHO TEQ-98) NG/KG
Data Qualifiers
J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate.
28
SP01SD
SP02SD
SP03SD
15000
110000
I
29000
3400
32000
8100
380
3800
1600
330
3400
1000
290
3100
1200
1000
11000
2600
220
2200
860
650
6300
1200
100
810
470
100
950
380
39
420
170
340
3800
1500
74
770
350
9
120
29
8
74
28
26000
I
170000
I
46000
I
9300
I
99000
I
24000
I
6700
I
67000
I
13000
I
6900
I
73000
I
18000
I
220000
I
220000
I
120000
I
6200
I
37000
I
11000
750
I
9500
I
3000
I
1500
I
18000
I
6600
I
120
I
2500
I
490
I
200
I
3500
I
780
I
460
4400
I
1500
500
4800
I
1700
650
6000
J
1900
-------
Table 6.4
Dioxin Analytical Data Summary, Sediments
Davis Timber Superfund Site
Post-katrina NPL and Non-NPL Superfund Site Evaluations
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodib en/odioxin N G/KG
1.2.3.4.6.7.8-Heptachlorodib en/ofuran N G/KG
1.2.3.4.7.8.9-Heptachlorodib en/ofuran N G/KG
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin NG/KG
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran NG/KG
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin NG/KG
1.2.3.6.7.8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran NG/KG
1.2.3.7.8.9-Hexachlorodib en/odioxin N G/KG
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzofuran NG/KG
1,2,3.7.8-Pentachlorodiben/odioxin NG/KG
1,2,3.7.8-Pentachlorodiben/ofuran NG/KG
2,3,4,6,7,8-Hexachlorodib en/ofuran N G/KG
2.3.4.7.8-Pentachlorodiben/ofuran NG/KG
2,3,7,8-T etrachlorodib en/odioxin N G/KG
2,3,7,8-T etrachlorodib en/ofuran N G/KG
Heptachlorodiben/odioxin (Total) NG/KG
Heptachlorodiben/ofuran (Total) NG/KG
Hexachlorodiben/odioxin (Total) NG/KG
Hexachlorodiben/ofuran (Total) NG/KG
Octachlorodiben/odioxin NG/KG
Octachlorodiben/ofuran NG/KG
Pentachlorodiben/odioxin (Total) NG/KG
Pentachlorodiben/ofuran (Total) NG/KG
Tetrachlorodiben/odioxin (Total) NG/KG
Tetrachlorodiben/ofuran (Total) NG/KG
TEQ (Avian Toxic. Equiv. Value, From WHO TEQ-98) NG/KG
TEQ (Fish Toxic. Equiv. Value, From WHO TEQ-98) NG/KG
TEQ (Mammalian Toxic. Equiv. Value, From WHO TEQ-98) NG/KG
Data Qualifiers
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit.
J-Identification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate.
29
DT01SD
13000
2400
210
140
93
560
83
320
33
45
16
150
35
2.4
3.4
21000
I
7700
I
3300
I
3200
I
93000
I
7700
380
I
590
I
86
I
100
I
220
230
370
DT02SD
1100
190
16
11
7.6
50
5.5
24
2.7
2.9
1.2
I
10
3.2
0.3
I
0.34
V
1800
I
610
I
240
I
220
I
8600
I
630
22
I
45
I
4.6
I
5.7
I
17
18
30
DT01SDS
17000
3200
270
190
120
710
100
440
41
60
19
190
43
3.3
4.5
27000
11000
4200
4000
92000
9200
510
840
130
140
280
300
480
-------
7.0 IMPACT EVALUATION
The data presented in Section 6 was evaluated by the Region 4 Waste Management
Division, Technical Services Section (TSS), in consultation with the RPM for each site, to
determine if there were any observable or attributable Post-Katrina impacts at the NPL and
Non-NPL sites selected for this investigation. Evaluating the sampling data to determine if
there was an off-site impact from Hurricane Katrina posed a challenge at some sites, due to the
scarcity of pre-existing sampling data and supporting information suitable for data
interpretation. The NPL designations are provided in the section heading for each site.
Conclusions regarding the potential impact of the hurricane on these sites are based on
a comparison of post-hurricane data to existing soil and sediment clean up values defined for
the site, or available past sample data collected during remedial investigations or routine
monitoring activities. In addition, the results were compared to EPA Region 9 Preliminary
Remediation Goals (PRCs) and the Office of Water's 2004 National Recommended Water
Quality Criteria (NRWQC) to determine if conditions at the sites might represent previously
unrecognized risks to human health and the environment. EPA Region 9 PRCs (available at:
http://vvvvvv.epa.gov/region9/vvaste/sfund/prg/index.html) are risk-based concentrations based
on long-term (i.e., 30-year) exposures to children and adults in a residential setting. The PRCs
are intended to assist risk assessors and others in initial screening-level evaluations of
environmental measurements. EPA Office of Water's 2004 N RWQC- (available at:
http://vvvvvv.epa.gov/vvaterscience/criteria/vvqcriteria.html ) are a compilation of surface water
quality criteria for the protection of aquatic life and human health for approximately 150
pollutants.
The results of these evaluations are presented in Sections 7.1 through 7.11.
7.1 Olin-Mclntosh Plant, Mcintosh, Alabama (NPL)
Sediment and surface water samples were collected at two locations and analyzed for
volatile organic compounds and mercury.
Total mercury, a site-related contaminant of concern, was detected in sample OM02SD
at 0.58 mg/kg, below the 55 mg/kg clean up level defined in the ROD and the residential PRC
of 23 mg/kg. Historically, mercury concentrations in sediments at this location have ranged
from non-detect to 10.4 mg/kg. The detection of 0.58 mg/kg, therefore, is consistent with
results obtained from the 1991 -1992 sampling for the remedial investigation conducted at the
site.
1,3-Dichlorobenzene, the only VOC identified in site sediment, was detected in sample
OM02SD at 4J ug/kg, below the 140 mg/kg clean up level defined in the ROD and the
residential PRC of 530 mg/kg.
Mercury was detected in surface water sample OMO1SW, located west of the facility
near Highway 43, at a concentration of 0.2 1 ug/1. This location is near the well sand piles,
known to contain mercury at concentrations exceeding 100 mg/kg. The detected concentration
of 0.2 1 ug/1 is below the national recommended water quality criteria (NRWQC) value of 0.77
ug/1, but above the State of Alabama standard for protection of aquatic life of 0.012 ug/1. This
sample, however, was not taken in a permanent body of water capable of sustaining aquatic
30
-------
life. Furthermore, the reported concentration is less than previously detected concentrations of
mercury in surface water at the site.
There is no indication of an adverse impact due to a release from the 01 in Corporation
Mcintosh Plant associated with Hurricane Katrina. Reported concentrations of site-related
contaminants of concern (COC) are consistent with historical characterization data and no
chemicals, COC or otherwise, were found to exceed any risk-based residential human health
benchmarks. The Alabama Department of Environmental Management is aware of the
ongoing runoff of mercury at the well sand residue area and is continuing to monitor potential
impacts from this area.
7.2 Ciba Geigy, Mcintosh, Alabama (NPL)
Sediment and surface water samples were collected and analyzed for pesticides and
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) from the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) permitted outfall at the T ombigbee River. No site-related contaminants of concern
(COC) were detected in the surface water sample.
Low levels of the pesticide 4,4'-DDT (p,p'-DDT) and its metabolites 4,4'-DDD (p,p'-
DDD), and 4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE) were detected in sample CGO1SD. No other pesticides or
PCBs were detected. 4,4'-DDD was detected at 4.4 J ug/kg, 4,4'-DDE was detected at 7.1
ug/kg, and 4,4'-DDT was detected at 3.3 J ug/kg. In sample CGO 1 SDS (a split sample from
CG01 SD) 4,4'-DDD was detected at 33 ug/kg, 4,4'-DDE was detected at 5.0 ug/kg, and 4,4'-
DDT was detected at 20 ug/kg.
All of the concentrations of 4,4'-DDT and its metabolites detected following Hurricane
Katrina were below the sediment cleanup level in the Record of Decision for the total of 4,4'-
DDT, 4,4'-DDD, and 4,4'-DDE of 15 mg/kg. No detected concentrations of DDT, DDD or
DDE exceeded residential PRC soil screening benchmarks. Moreover, it is unlikely for persons
to become exposed to the sediments collected at the NPDES outfall at the Tombigbee River
because the sediments are permanently covered by water. 4,4'-DDT, 4,4'-DDD, and 4,4'-DDE
are pesticides which have been historically detected in the sediments in the vicinity of the Ciba
Geigy facility.
The diazinon data for sediment sample CGO 1 SD and surface water sample CGO 1SW
were rejected by the standard quality assurance procedures used to evaluate laboratory data.
The data could not be used to make a statement about the presence of absence of diazinon in
the sediment. The reporting levels for the rejected data, however, were well below the
corresponding residential PRG of 55,000 ug/kg.
There is no indication of an adverse impact due to a release from the Ciba Geigy Plant
associated with Hurricane Katrina. Reported concentrations of site-related COCs are
consistent with historical characterization data and no chemicals, COC or otherwise, were
found to exceed any risk-based residential human health benchmarks.
31
-------
7.3 Stauffcr-Cold Creek (Syngenta), LeMoyne, Alabama (NPL)
Four sediment samples were collected. Because no water was present at the time of
sampling, surface water samples, which were planned at these locations, were not collected.
Sediment samples were analyzed for a suite of thiocarbamate herbicides, including Butyl ate
(Sutan™), Cycloate (Ro-Neet™), EPTC (Eptam™), Pebulate (Tillam™) and Vernolate
(Vernam™). Data validation for the herbicide Molinate (Ordram™) was rejected for all
samples tested. No surface soil or sediment clean up criteria were defined in the RODs for the
site. There was no historical sediment data for the NPDES outfalls to which the sampling
results could be compared. Sampling data were compared to residential PRCs.
The reported concentrations for detected herbicides were all less than available
residential PRCs. There were no available screening levels for Cycloate on the EPA Region 9
PRC table to screen the three detections, which ranged from 630 CJ ug/kg to 1300 C ug/kg.
Upon search of the EP A Pesticides program website, an oral RfD was located
[http://vvvvvv.epa.gov/REDs/cycloate_red.pdf]. Using the RfD of 0.005 mg/kg-d, a screening
level residential soil PRC can be generated (about 300 mg/kg) that is much higher than the
reported concentrations.
There is no indication of an adverse impact due to a release from the Stauffer-Cold
Creek Plant associated with Hurricane Katrina. Reported concentrations for this evaluation for
detected thiocarbamate herbicides are below available residential PRCs.
7.4 Stauffer Chemical - LeMoyne Plant (Akzo Nobel), LeMoyne, Alabama (NPL)
Sediment samples were collected from two locations, SL01 and SL02. Because no
water was present at the time of sampling, surface water samples, which were planned at these
locations, were not collected. The samples were analyzed for total mercury, cyanide and
volatile organic compounds. There was no historical sediment data for the NPDES outfalls to
which the evaluation sampling results could be compared. No surface soil or sediment clean up
criteria were defined in the RODs for the site. Sampling data were compared to residential risk-
risk based screening levels.
The volatile organic compounds toluene and acetone were detected in samples from
location SL02. Low levels of total mercury were detected at location SL01. The detected level
of total mercury (0.87 mg/kg) is below the screening level for residential soil, even if the
mercury is assumed to be in the more toxic methylated form (6.1 mg/kg). There is no
indication of an adverse impact due to a release from the Stauffer-LeMoyne Plant associated
with Hurricane Katrina. Reported concentrations for this evaluation are all below available
residential risk-based human health screening values.
7.5 Perdido Groundwater Contamination, Perdido, Alabama (NPL)
Two water samples, PG01 and PG02, were collected from the groundwater treatment
system influent and effluent lines, respectively, at the Perdido Groundwater Contamination
groundwater treatment system. Both samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds.
No volatile organic compounds were detected in either of the samples. The results were non-
32
-------
detect for all analyzed constituents. The reported quantitation limits ("U" values) all appear to
achieve the targeted contract-required quantitation limits (CRQLs).
There does not appear to be any significant detrimental change in concentrations of
site-related chemicals at the sampled groundwater locations. No analytes were detected in the
current groundwater samples collected from the site. There is no indication of an adverse
impact on the groundwater treatment system at the Perdido Groundwater Contamination site.
The treatment system is still functioning as designed.
7.6 Redwing Carriers (Saraland Apartments), Saraland, Alabama (NPL)
Two sediment samples were collected from ditches adjacent to the Redwing Carriers
site. Because no water was present at the time of sampling, surface water samples, which were
planned, were not collected at these locations. The samples were analyzed for extractable
organic compounds, pesticides/PCBs and the herbicide Vernolate (Vernam™). The results
were low or non-detect for the analyzed pesticides and herbicides. The reported concentrations
are all less than human health risk-based residential soil screening levels.
The ROD defined polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) as the primary contaminants of
concern. Seven different PAH compounds were detected. Sample concentrations were
compared to the 94.9 mg/kg cleanup level for benzo-a-pyrene, the 540 mg/kg cleanup level for
benzo-b-fluoranthene, and the 362 mg/kg cleanup level for crysene that were set for the site.
None of the samples collected from the site contained concentrations of the contaminants of
concern above the cleanup levels established for the site. Only one detection of
benzo[a]pyrene (150 ug/kg) was above a 1E-6 cancer risk-based residential soil level, but it
was less than the 1E-5 risk level (620 ug/kg). The other PAH detections, as well as the
Dieldrin and DDE detections, were below the 1E-6 cancer risk-based residential soil level.
Many of the data points for these contaminants are "J" flagged, indicating uncertainty in the
reported concentration. This uncertainty, however, is common and accepted in reported site
data.
There is no indication of an adverse impact due to Hurricane Katrina at the sampled
sediment locations. Detections were reported for two pesticides (DDE at 2.3 ug/kg and
Dieldrin at 4.1 ug/kg) and for several PAH compounds. All sediment evaluation data are
below residential soil screening levels (PRCs) for the listed chemicals.
7.7 American Creosote Works, Louisville, Mississippi (NPL)
Surface water and sediment samples were collected at two locations, ACO1 and AC02,
and were analyzed for extractable organic compounds, including the PAH compounds
comprising the site contaminants of concern (COC). Numerous extractable organic
compounds, primarily the polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), were detected in the
two sediment samples.
Samples taken post-Katrina exceed levels of several PAH compounds detected in
sampling conducted in March 2005, however surficial and shallow sediment contamination is
known to be non-uniform and highly variable at the site, and it is highly likely that the recent
sampling encountered a hot spot of contamination present prior to the hurricane. Ongoing
33
-------
releases of contamination to sediment have been documented and appear to fluctuate with
seasonal rainfall events. Based on the site history and the RPM's direct observations, the
contamination observed and documented by this evaluation is known to have been pre-existing
and of similar magnitude and does not appear to be a direct result of a release due to Hurricane
Katrina. However, there is uncertainty regarding whether there is a true impact or not due to
the variability of sediment contamination.
Reported concentrations of COCs exceeded the Region 9 PRCs for the 1E-06 cancer
risk for the residential exposure scenario. Benzo(a)anthracene (83,000 ug/kg) was above a 1E-
4 cancer risk-based residential soil level (62000 ug/kg). Benzo(a)pyrene (34000 ug/kg) was
above a 1E-4 cancer risk-based residential soil level (6200 ug/kg). Benzo(b)fluoranthene
(36,000 ug/kg) exceeded the 1 E-06 level (620 ug/kg) but did not exceed the 1E-04 level
(62,000 ug/kg). Benzo(k)fluoranthene (33,000 ug/kg) was above the 1 E-06 level (6,200 ug/kg)
but below the 1E-05 risk level (62,000 ug/kg). Dibenz(a,h)anthracene (5,900 ug/kg) exceeded
the 1 E-06 risk level (62 ug/kg) but was below the 1 E-04 risk level (6,200 ug/kg). Indeno( 1,2,3-
cd)pyrene (15,000 ug/kg) was above the 1 E-06 risk level (620 ug/kg) but below the 1 E-04 risk
level (62,000 ug/kg).
It is important to note that sediments have been sampled previously during earlier site
characterizations and were known to be adversely impacted by the site prior to Hurricane
Katrina. Sediment contamination is being addressed in ongoing remedial actions at the site.
Additionally, EPA Region 4 normally considers long-term human exposure to sediments that
are under water, as are the sediments sampled for this evaluation, to be minimal due to
infrequent opportunities for contact of significant duration. Five site-related PAH compounds
were also detected in the surface water samples, but all detections were less than 10 ug/1 and
below national recommended water quality criteria.
7.8 Sonford Products, Flowood, Mississippi (Non-NPL)
Sediment samples were collected at three locations, SP01, SP02 and SP03. Sediment
samples were analyzed for metals, extractable organic compounds, pesticide/PCBs and dioxins
Site-specific COCs, from previous site evaluations, are pesticides, including PCP, lindane,
DDT, dioxins/furans, and possibly lead and arsenic.
Sampling data were evaluated against existing environmental sampling results and were
compared to available risk-based human health screening values. Detections of lead in
sediment samples were below residential screening values, however arsenic (1.4 mg/kg, 4.1
mg/kg, 2.9 mg/kg) exceeded the 1 E-06 residential risk level, however 2 of the three samples
were below the 1E-05 risk level (4 mg/kg) with one slightly exceeding this level but still well
below the 1 E-04 risk level (40 mg/kg) and within the risk range. Benzo(a)pyrene (240 ug/kg)
was above the 1 E-06 risk level but below the 1 E-05 risk level (620 ug/kg).
The dioxin/furan analyses for these three sediment samples reported Toxicity
Equivalent (TEQ) levels of 0.65 ug/kg (SP01 SD), 6.0 ug/kg (SP02SD), and 1.9 ug/kg
(SP03SD). These post-hurricane levels are well within the range of reported TEQ levels from
pre-hurricane (April 2005) sediment/soil samples from this site (range of 0.004 - 77.0 ug/kg).
All are well below EPA's residential clean up criteria for dioxin of 1000 ug/kg.
34
-------
The results were low or non-detect for the site COCs (pesticides). The results from
analyses of the samples were all non-detect ("U") for pentachlorophenol (PCP); however, the
U values (1200U, 2600U, 1200U ug/kg) appear to be somewhat elevated. This casts some
doubt as to whether PCP may have been present in the samples at some level. Even if the PCP
were hypothetically present at levels close to the U values (1200-2600 ug/kg), however, the
site levels still would not be judged as significantly elevated relative to those levels reported
from samples collected prior to hurricane Katrina or relative to risk-based levels (the
residential soil screening PRC [1E-6 risk] for PCP is 3000 ug/kg). Many of the data points for
these contaminants are "J" flagged, indicating uncertainty in the reported concentration. This
uncertainty, however, is common and accepted in reported site data.
There does not appear to be any significant detrimental change in concentrations of
site-related chemicals at the sampled locations. Analytical results for pentachlorophenol (PCP)
in the current samples were all non-detect ("U").
7.9 Davis Timber, Hattiesburg, Mississippi (NPL)
Sediment samples were collected at two locations, DT01 and DT02, Because of dry
conditions, surface water samples, which were planned, were not collected at these locations.
Sediment samples were analyzed for dioxins and extractable organic compounds; site
contaminants of concern (COCs) are dioxin and pentachlorophenol. The evaluation data were
compared against previous site data and to risk-based values.
Many of the data points for these contaminants are "J" flagged, indicating uncertainty
in the concentration. This uncertainty, however, is common in reported site data. There are no
apparent site specific data uncertainties that cast significant doubt on the results or on the
conclusions herein.
Reported concentrations of dioxins/furans and pentachlorophenol (PCP) are
comparable to (or less than) reported levels from samples taken in 2004. Levels of 2,3,7,8-
TCDD (8.6 E-05 mg/kg) exceeded the 1E-06 risk level (4E-06 mg/kg) but were below the 1E-4
risk level (4E-04 mg/kg) and EPA's residential clean up criteria of 1000 ug/kg. All other
detected analytes are below residential soil screening levels at the 1 E-06 risk level. There does
not appear to be any significant detrimental change in concentrations of site-related chemicals
at the sampled locations.
7.10 Chemfax, Inc., Gulfport, Mississippi (Non-NPL)
Four sediment samples were collected across four transects of the Bernard Bayou at
locations likely to have been impacted by a release from the Chemfax, Inc. site. Acetophenone
was the only extractable organic compound detected and was reported at a concentration of 96
ug/kg in one sample from location CF04SD. This concentration is well below residential PRC
soil screening values. Acetone was the only volatile organic compound identified in the four
samples and was present at concentrations less than 20 ug/kg. Acetone is a common laboratory
contaminant and it is possible this detection resulted from the analysis. Detected concentrations
were below residential PRCs.
35
-------
There is no indication of an adverse impact due to a release from the Chemfax, Inc. site
associated with Hurricane Katrina. Reported concentrations are all below available risk-based
soil screening levels for these analytes.
7.11 Picayune Wood Treating, Picayune, Mississippi (NPL)
Sediment samples were collected at three locations, PW01, PW02 and PW03. In
addition, a surface water sample was also collected at location PW02. All samples were
analyzed for extractable organic compounds. Samples were collected from locations that were
likely to have been impacted by a potential release, if it were to have occurred. Generally low
levels of PAH compounds, the site-related COCs, were detected in the sediment samples
collected at the site.
Since no ROD-derived clean up values were available, evaluation data was compared
against established residential soil screening values. Benzo(a)pyrene (660 ug/kg) exceeded the
1E-06 risk level (62 ug/kg) but did not exceed the 1E-05 risk level (620 ug/kg). N one of the
other COCs exceeded established risk-based human health screening values (PRCs). No
extractable organic compounds were detected in the surface water sample collected for the
evaluation.
Based on this evaluation, there does not appear to be any indication of any adverse
impact due to a release from the site associated with Hurricane Katrina. Reported
concentrations for sediment and surface water were either below or within established risk-
based soil/sediment screening levels for detected analytes.
36
-------
8.0 REFERENCES
1. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of
1980 (CERCLA) and the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
1986 (SARA).
2. U.S. EPA, EPAQA/G-4, Guidance for the Data Quality Objectives Process,
EPA/600/R-96/055, August 2000.
3. U.S. EPA, EPAQA/G-5, EPA Guidance for Quality Assurance Project Plans,
EPA/600/R-98/018, February 1998.
4. U.S. EPA, Region 4, Analytical Support Branch Operations and Quality Control
Manual Revision 1, (ASBLOQAM). November 2004.
5. U.S. EPA, Region 4, Environmental Investigations Standard Operating
Procedures and Quality Assurance Manual (E1SOPQAM). November 2001.
(http://vvvvvv.epa.gov/region4/sesd/sesdpub_guidance.html).
6. USE PA Contract laboratory Program Statement of Work For Inorganic Analysis,
ILM05.3 March 2004. http://vvvvvv.epa.gov/superfund/programs/clp/inorg.htm
7. USE PA Contract laboratory Program Statement of Work For Inorganic Analysis,
OLM04.2, May, 1999. http://vvvvvv.epa.gov/superfund/programs/clp/organic.htm
37
-------
Appendix A
Figures
38
-------
(Jackson
.Ghatomj
.State Line
Frisco Cil
Olin-Mclntosh
Plant ,
Leakesville |
Perdido GW
Contamination
Stauffer-Cold Creek
(Syngenta Corp.)
Attn on
LeMo1
Redwing Carriers
(Saraland Apts.)
.Creola'
-Bay Minette
iSatsuma
Stauffer-LeMoyne
(Akzo Nobel)
'Wilmer
Saraland
Chickasaw
[Pric'harci
Big Greek-Lake1
Loxlc"
iDaphni
jillmansfCorner
Theodore
A NPL/Superfund Site
iGrand Bay
'oint Clear
.Bscatawpa' '
4Moss'Poiht
Mobile Bay
Bayou La Batre
ascagoula!
Perdido Bay
lggS'-Deborme Mapping
Figure 1
NPL Locations, Alabama
Post-Katrina Site Evaluations
39
-------
Starkville
.Greenville
American Creosote
Louisville
Sonford
Products
[eridiari
ackson.
fFayette
Davis
Timber
Hattiesburg
Picayune
Wood
Chemfax,
Inc.
Mobile
BatonrRougi
Gulfport
ANPL/Superfund Site
1993 PeLorme Mapping'
Figure 2
NPL Locations, Mississippi
Post-Katrina Site Evaluations
40
-------
OM01SD
OM01SW
OM02SW
Olin-Mclntosh Plant
OM02SD
2000
2000
4000 Feet
Figure 3
Olin-Mclntosh Plant
Sampling Locations
-------
2000 4000 Feet Figure 4
Ciba Geigy
Sampling Locations
-------
SC01SD
SC03SD
Stauffer-Cold Creek
(Syngenta)
SC04SD
SL01SD
Stauffer-LeMoyne
(Akzo Nobel)
2000
2000 Feet
Figure 5
Stauffer-Cold Creek and Lemoyne
Sampling Locations
-------
PG01GW
PG02GW
1000
1000
2000 Feet
Figure 6
Perdido Groundwater Contamination
Sampling Locations
-------
200
200 400 Feet
Figure 7
Redwing Carriers
Sampling Locations
-------
AC01SW
AC01SD
American Creosote
AC02SW
AC02SD
SB,
1000
1000
2000 Feet
Figure 8
American Creosote Works, Inc.
Sampling Locations
-------
Sonford Products
4 1SP01SD
SP03SD
SP01SW
400
400
800
1200
1600 Feet
Figure 9
Sonford Products
Sampling Locations
-------
OC
DT02SD
DT01SD
Davis
Timber
M,
1000
1000
2000 Feet
Figure 10
Davis Timber
Sampling Locations
-------
-ti
lO
400
400
800
1200 Feet
Figure 11
Chemfax, Inc.
Sampling Locations
-------
o
Figure 12
Picayune Wood Treating
Sampling Locations
-------
Appendix B
Complete Data
51
-------
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/25/2005 16:51
Sample 112 FY 2006 Project: 06-0045
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Olin Corp. (Mcintosh Plant) NPL
Program: SF
Id/Station: OM02SD/
Media: SEDIMENT
Mcintosh, AL
Case No: 34748
MD No: 3AY4
D No: 3AY4
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 14:10
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
14
U
UG/KG
Dichlorodifluoromethane
14
U
UG/KG
Dibromochloromethane
14
U
UG/KG
Chloromethane
14
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
14
U
UG/KG
Vinyl Chloride
14
U
UG/KG
Chlorobenzene
14
U
UG/KG
Bromomethane
14
U
UG/KG
Ethyl Benzene
14
U
UG/KG
Chloroethane
14
U
UG/KG
Total Xylenes
14
U
UG/KG
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon11)
14
U
UG/KG
Styrene
14
U
UG/KG
1,1-Dichloroethene (1,1-Dichloroethylene)
14
U
UG/KG
Bromoform
14
U
UG/KG
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
14
U
UG/KG
Isopropylbenzene
14
UJ
UG/KG
Acetone
14
U
UG/KG
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
14
U
UG/KG
Carbon Disulfide
4
J
UG/KG
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
14
U
UG/KG
Methyl Acetate
14
U
UG/KG
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
14
U
UG/KG
Methylene Chloride
14
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
14
U
UG/KG
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
14
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
14
U
UG/KG
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
14
U
UG/KG
1,2,4-T richlorobenzene
14
U
UG/KG
1,1-Dichloroethane
NA
UG/KG
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
14
U
UG/KG
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
27
%
% Moisture
14
UJ
NA
UG/KG
UG/KG
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
14
U
UG/KG
Chloroform
14
U
UG/KG
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
14
U
UG/KG
Cyclohexane
14
U
UG/KG
Carbon Tetrachloride
14
U
UG/KG
Benzene
14
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dichloroethane
14
U
UG/KG
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
14
U
UG/KG
Methylcyclohexane
14
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dichloropropane
14
U
UG/KG
Bromodichloromethane
14
U
UG/KG
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
14
U
UG/KG
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
14
U
UG/KG
Toluene
14
U
UG/KG
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
14
U
UG/KG
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
14
U
UG/KG
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
14
UJ
UG/KG
Methyl Butyl Ketone
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/25/2005 16:51
Sample 113 FY 2006 Project: 06-0045
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Olin Corp. (Mcintosh Plant) NPL Mcintosh, AL
Program: SF Case No: 34748
Id/Station: OM02SW / MD No: 3AY5
Media: SURFACE WATER D No: 3AY5
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
10
u
UG/L
Dichlorodifluoromethane
10
u
UG/L
Dibromochloromethane
10
u
UG/L
Chloromethane
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
10
u
UG/L
Vinyl Chloride
10
u
UG/L
Chlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
Bromomethane
10
u
UG/L
Ethyl Benzene
10
u
UG/L
Chloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Total Xylenes
10
u
UG/L
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon11)
10
u
UG/L
Styrene
10
u
UG/L
1,1-Dichloroethene (1,1-Dichloroethylene)
10
u
UG/L
Bromoform
10
u
UG/L
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
10
u
UG/L
Isopropylbenzene
10
u
UG/L
Acetone
10
u
UG/L
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Carbon Disulfide
10
u
UG/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
Methyl Acetate
10
u
UG/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
Methylene Chloride
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
10
u
UG/L
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
10
u
UG/L
1,2,4-T richlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
1,1-Dichloroethane
NA
UG/L
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
10
u
NA
UG/L
UG/L
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
10
u
UG/L
Chloroform
10
u
UG/L
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Cyclohexane
10
u
UG/L
Carbon Tetrachloride
10
u
UG/L
Benzene
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dichloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
10
u
UG/L
Methylcyclohexane
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dichloropropane
10
u
UG/L
Bromodichloromethane
10
u
UG/L
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10
u
UG/L
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
10
u
UG/L
Toluene
10
u
UG/L
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
10
u
UG/L
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
10
u
UG/L
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 14:00
Ending:
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/25/2005 16:51
Sample 114 FY 2006 Project: 06-0045
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Olin Corp. (Mcintosh Plant) NPL
Program: SF
Id/Station: OM01SD/
Media: SEDIMENT
Mcintosh, AL
Case No: 34748
MD No: 3AY6
D No: 3AY6
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 15:30
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
16
U
UG/KG
Dichlorodifluoromethane
16
U
UG/KG
Dibromochloromethane
16
U
UG/KG
Chloromethane
16
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
16
U
UG/KG
Vinyl Chloride
16
U
UG/KG
Chlorobenzene
16
U
UG/KG
Bromomethane
16
U
UG/KG
Ethyl Benzene
16
U
UG/KG
Chloroethane
16
U
UG/KG
Total Xylenes
16
U
UG/KG
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon11)
16
U
UG/KG
Styrene
16
U
UG/KG
1,1-Dichloroethene (1,1-Dichloroethylene)
16
U
UG/KG
Bromoform
16
U
UG/KG
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
16
U
UG/KG
Isopropylbenzene
16
UJ
UG/KG
Acetone
16
U
UG/KG
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
16
U
UG/KG
Carbon Disulfide
16
U
UG/KG
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
16
U
UG/KG
Methyl Acetate
16
U
UG/KG
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
16
U
UG/KG
Methylene Chloride
16
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
16
U
UG/KG
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
16
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
16
U
UG/KG
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
16
U
UG/KG
1,2,4-T richlorobenzene
16
U
UG/KG
1,1-Dichloroethane
NA
UG/KG
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
16
U
UG/KG
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
31
%
% Moisture
16
UJ
NA
UG/KG
UG/KG
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
16
U
UG/KG
Chloroform
16
U
UG/KG
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
16
U
UG/KG
Cyclohexane
16
U
UG/KG
Carbon Tetrachloride
16
U
UG/KG
Benzene
16
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dichloroethane
16
U
UG/KG
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
16
U
UG/KG
Methylcyclohexane
16
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dichloropropane
16
U
UG/KG
Bromodichloromethane
16
U
UG/KG
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
16
U
UG/KG
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
16
U
UG/KG
Toluene
16
U
UG/KG
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
16
U
UG/KG
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
16
U
UG/KG
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
16
UJ
UG/KG
Methyl Butyl Ketone
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/25/2005 16:51
Sample 114 FY 2006 Project: 06-0045
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Olin Corp. (Mcintosh Plant) NPL
Program: SF
Id/Station: OM01SD/
Media: SEDIMENT
Mcintosh, AL
Case No: 34748
MD No: 3AY6
D No: 3AY6
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 15:30
Ending:
RESULTS UNITS
13 J
N
UG/KG
UG/KG
ANALYTE
UNKNOWN
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/25/2005 16:51
Sample 115 FY 2006 Project: 06-0045
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Olin Corp. (Mcintosh Plant) NPL Mcintosh, AL
Program: SF Case No: 34748
Id/Station: OM01SW / MD No: 3AY7
Media: SURFACE WATER D No: 3AY7
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
10
u
UG/L
Dichlorodifluoromethane
10
u
UG/L
Dibromochloromethane
10
u
UG/L
Chloromethane
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
10
u
UG/L
Vinyl Chloride
10
u
UG/L
Chlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
Bromomethane
10
u
UG/L
Ethyl Benzene
10
u
UG/L
Chloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Total Xylenes
10
u
UG/L
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon11)
10
u
UG/L
Styrene
10
u
UG/L
1,1-Dichloroethene (1,1-Dichloroethylene)
10
u
UG/L
Bromoform
10
u
UG/L
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
10
u
UG/L
Isopropylbenzene
10
u
UG/L
Acetone
10
u
UG/L
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Carbon Disulfide
10
u
UG/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
Methyl Acetate
10
u
UG/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
Methylene Chloride
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
10
u
UG/L
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
10
u
UG/L
1,2,4-T richlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
1,1-Dichloroethane
NA
UG/L
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
10
u
NA
UG/L
UG/L
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
10
u
UG/L
Chloroform
10
u
UG/L
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Cyclohexane
10
u
UG/L
Carbon Tetrachloride
10
u
UG/L
Benzene
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dichloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
10
u
UG/L
Methylcyclohexane
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dichloropropane
10
u
UG/L
Bromodichloromethane
10
u
UG/L
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10
u
UG/L
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
10
u
UG/L
Toluene
10
u
UG/L
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
10
u
UG/L
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
10
u
UG/L
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 15:25
Ending:
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/25/2005 16:51
Sample 117 FY 2006 Project: 06-0045
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Olin Corp. (Mcintosh Plant) NPL Mcintosh, AL
Program: SF Case No: 34748
Id/Station: QA02TB/
Media: TRIP BLANK-SOIL D No: 3AY9
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
14
U
UG/KG
Dichlorodifluoromethane
14
U
UG/KG
Dibromochloromethane
14
U
UG/KG
Chloromethane
14
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
14
U
UG/KG
Vinyl Chloride
14
U
UG/KG
Chlorobenzene
14
U
UG/KG
Bromomethane
14
U
UG/KG
Ethyl Benzene
14
U
UG/KG
Chloroethane
14
U
UG/KG
Total Xylenes
14
U
UG/KG
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon11)
14
U
UG/KG
Styrene
14
U
UG/KG
1,1-Dichloroethene (1,1-Dichloroethylene)
14
U
UG/KG
Bromoform
14
U
UG/KG
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
14
U
UG/KG
Isopropylbenzene
18
J
UG/KG
Acetone
14
U
UG/KG
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
14
U
UG/KG
Carbon Disulfide
14
U
UG/KG
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
14
U
UG/KG
Methyl Acetate
14
U
UG/KG
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
14
U
UG/KG
Methylene Chloride
14
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
14
U
UG/KG
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
14
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
14
U
UG/KG
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
14
U
UG/KG
1,2,4-T richlorobenzene
14
U
UG/KG
1,1-Dichloroethane
NA
UG/KG
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
14
U
UG/KG
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
9
%
% Moisture
14
UJ
NA
UG/KG
UG/KG
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
14
U
UG/KG
Chloroform
14
U
UG/KG
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
14
U
UG/KG
Cyclohexane
14
U
UG/KG
Carbon Tetrachloride
14
U
UG/KG
Benzene
14
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dichloroethane
14
U
UG/KG
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
14
U
UG/KG
Methylcyclohexane
14
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dichloropropane
14
U
UG/KG
Bromodichloromethane
14
U
UG/KG
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
14
U
UG/KG
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
14
U
UG/KG
Toluene
14
U
UG/KG
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
14
U
UG/KG
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
14
U
UG/KG
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
14
UJ
UG/KG
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 16:34
Ending:
Org Contractor: LIBRTY DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/25/2005 16:51
Sample 117 FY 2006 Project: 06-0045
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Olin Corp. (Mcintosh Plant) NPL
Program: SF
Id/Station: QA02TB/
Media: TRIP BLANK-SOIL
Mcintosh, AL
Case No: 34748
D No: 3AY9
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 16:34
Ending:
RESULTS UNITS
9 J
N
UG/KG
UG/KG
ANALYTE
UNKNOWN
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/25/2005 16:51
Sample 118 FY 2006 Project: 06-0045
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Olin Corp. (Mcintosh Plant) NPL Mcintosh, AL
Program: SF Case No: 34748
Id/Station: QA01TB/
Media: TRIP BLANK - WATER D No: 3AZ1
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
10
u
UG/L
Dichlorodifluoromethane
10
u
UG/L
Dibromochloromethane
10
u
UG/L
Chloromethane
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
10
u
UG/L
Vinyl Chloride
10
u
UG/L
Chlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
Bromomethane
10
u
UG/L
Ethyl Benzene
10
u
UG/L
Chloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Total Xylenes
10
u
UG/L
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon11)
10
u
UG/L
Styrene
10
u
UG/L
1,1-Dichloroethene (1,1-Dichloroethylene)
10
u
UG/L
Bromoform
10
u
UG/L
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
10
u
UG/L
Isopropylbenzene
10
u
UG/L
Acetone
10
u
UG/L
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Carbon Disulfide
10
u
UG/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
Methyl Acetate
10
u
UG/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
Methylene Chloride
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
10
u
UG/L
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
10
u
UG/L
1,2,4-T richlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
1,1-Dichloroethane
NA
UG/L
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
10
u
NA
UG/L
UG/L
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
10
u
UG/L
Chloroform
10
u
UG/L
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Cyclohexane
10
u
UG/L
Carbon Tetrachloride
10
u
UG/L
Benzene
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dichloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
10
u
UG/L
Methylcyclohexane
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dichloropropane
10
u
UG/L
Bromodichloromethane
10
u
UG/L
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10
u
UG/L
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
10
u
UG/L
Toluene
10
u
UG/L
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
10
u
UG/L
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
10
u
UG/L
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 16:34
Ending:
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/25/2005 16:45
Sample 111 FY 2006 Project: 06-0045
SPECIFIED TESTS
Facility: Olin Corp. (Mcintosh Plant) NPL
Program: SF
Id/Station: OM00SW/
Media: SURFACE WATER
Mcintosh, AL
Case No: 34748
MD No: 3AY3
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 15:15
Ending:
RESULTS
0.20 U
UNITS
UG/L
ANALYTE
Total Mercury
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/25/2005 16:45
Sample 112 FY 2006 Project: 06-0045
SPECIFIED TESTS
Facility: Olin Corp. (Mcintosh Plant) NPL
Program: SF
Id/Station: OM02SD/
Media: SEDIMENT
Mcintosh, AL
Case No: 34748
MD No: 3AY4
D No: 3AY4
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 14:10
Ending:
RESULTS UNITS
0.58 MG/KG
19 %
ANALYTE
Total Mercury
% Moisture
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/25/2005 16:45
Sample 113 FY 2006 Project: 06-0045
SPECIFIED TESTS
Facility: Olin Corp. (Mcintosh Plant) NPL
Program: SF
Id/Station: OM02SW/
Media: SURFACE WATER
Mcintosh, AL
Case No: 34748
MD No: 3AY5
D No: 3AY5
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 14:00
Ending:
RESULTS
0.21
UNITS
UG/L
ANALYTE
Total Mercury
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/25/2005 16:45
Sample 114 FY 2006 Project: 06-0045
SPECIFIED TESTS
Facility: Olin Corp. (Mcintosh Plant) NPL
Program: SF
Id/Station: OM01SD/
Media: SEDIMENT
Mcintosh, AL
Case No: 34748
MD No: 3AY6
D No: 3AY6
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 15:30
Ending:
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
0.82 U MG/KG Total Mercury
39 % % Moisture
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/25/2005 16:45
Sample 115 FY 2006 Project: 06-0045
SPECIFIED TESTS
Facility: Olin Corp. (Mcintosh Plant) NPL
Program: SF
Id/Station: OM01SW/
Media: SURFACE WATER
Mcintosh, AL
Case No: 34748
MD No: 3AY7
D No: 3AY7
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 15:25
Ending:
RESULTS
0.20 U
UNITS
UG/L
ANALYTE
Total Mercury
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/25/2005 16:45
Sample 116 FY 2006 Project: 06-0045
SPECIFIED TESTS
Facility: Olin Corp. (Mcintosh Plant) NPL
Program: SF
Id/Station: QA03PB /
Media: PRESERVATIVE BLANK
Mcintosh, AL
Case No: 34748
MD No: 3AY8
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 16:34
Ending:
RESULTS
0.02 UJ
UNITS
UG/L
ANALYTE
Total Mercury
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/31/2005 17:48
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: King, Charles
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 11:40
Ending:
Org Contractor: LIBRTY data REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
2.5
U
UG/KG
alpha-BHC
2.5
U
UG/KG
beta-BHC
2.5
U
UG/KG
delta-BHC
2.5
U
UG/KG
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
2.5
U
UG/KG
Heptachlor
2.5
U
UG/KG
Aldrin
2.5
U
UG/KG
Heptachlor Epoxide
2.5
U
UG/KG
Endosulfan I (alpha)
4.9
U
UG/KG
Dieldrin
7.1
UG/KG
4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE)
4.9
U
UG/KG
Endrin
4.9
U
UG/KG
Endosulfan II (beta)
4.4
J
UG/KG
4,4'-DDD (p,p'-DDD)
4.9
U
UG/KG
Endosulfan Sulfate
3.3
J
UG/KG
4,4'-DDT (p, p'-DDT)
25
U
UG/KG
Methoxychlor
4.9
U
UG/KG
Endrin Ketone
4.9
U
UG/KG
Endrin Aldehyde
2.5
U
UG/KG
alpha-Chlordane /2
2.5
U
UG/KG
gamma-Chlordane /2
250
U
UG/KG
Toxaphene
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1016 (Aroclor 1016)
100
U
UG/KG
PCB-1221 (Aroclor 1221)
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1232 (Aroclor 1232)
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1242 (Aroclor 1242)
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1248 (Aroclor 1248)
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1254 (Aroclor 1254)
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1260 (Aroclor 1260)
33
%
% Moisture
Sample 135 FY 2006 Project: 06-0044
Pesticides & Aroclors Scan
Facility: Ciba-Geigy Mcintosh, AL
Program: SF Case No: 34747
Id/Station: CG01SD /
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3AX0
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
C-confirmed by GCMS | /1-when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents | /2-constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane rage 1 OT 1
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/31/2005 17:48
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: King, Charles
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 11:40
Ending:
Org Contractor: LIBRTY data REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
2.5
U
UG/KG
alpha-BHC
2.5
U
UG/KG
beta-BHC
2.5
U
UG/KG
delta-BHC
2.5
U
UG/KG
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
2.5
U
UG/KG
Heptachlor
2.5
U
UG/KG
Aldrin
2.5
U
UG/KG
Heptachlor Epoxide
2.5
U
UG/KG
Endosulfan I (alpha)
4.9
U
UG/KG
Dieldrin
6.8
UG/KG
4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE)
4.9
U
UG/KG
Endrin
4.9
U
UG/KG
Endosulfan II (beta)
5.0
UG/KG
4,4'-DDD (p,p'-DDD)
4.9
U
UG/KG
Endosulfan Sulfate
20
UG/KG
4,4'-DDT (p, p'-DDT)
25
U
UG/KG
Methoxychlor
4.9
U
UG/KG
Endrin Ketone
4.9
U
UG/KG
Endrin Aldehyde
2.5
U
UG/KG
alpha-Chlordane /2
2.5
U
UG/KG
gamma-Chlordane /2
250
U
UG/KG
Toxaphene
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1016 (Aroclor 1016)
100
U
UG/KG
PCB-1221 (Aroclor 1221)
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1232 (Aroclor 1232)
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1242 (Aroclor 1242)
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1248 (Aroclor 1248)
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1254 (Aroclor 1254)
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1260 (Aroclor 1260)
33
%
% Moisture
Sample 136 FY 2006
Pesticides & Aroclors Scan
Facility: Ciba-Geigy
Program: SF
Id/Station: CG01SDS /
Media: SEDIMENT
Project: 06-0044
Mcintosh, AL
Case No: 34747
D No: 3AX1
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
C-confirmed by GCMS | /1-when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents | /2-constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane rage 1 OT 1
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 10/31/2005 17:48
Sample 137 FY 2006
Project: 06-0044
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: King, Charles
Pesticides & Aroclors Scan
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Facility: Ciba-Geigy
Mcintosh, AL
Beginning: 10/13/2005 10:55
Program: SF
Case No: 34747
Ending:
Id/Station: CG01SW/
Media: SURFACE WATER
D No: 3AX2
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
0.050
U
UG/L
alpha-BHC
0.050
U
UG/L
beta-BHC
0.050
U
UG/L
delta-BHC
0.050
UJ
UG/L
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
0.050
UJ
UG/L
Heptachlor
0.050
U
UG/L
Aldrin
0.050
U
UG/L
Heptachlor Epoxide
0.050
u
UG/L
Endosulfan I (alpha)
0.10
UJ
UG/L
Dieldrin
0.10
UJ
UG/L
4,4'-DDE (p.p'-DDE)
0.10
UJ
UG/L
Endrin
0.10
u
UG/L
Endosulfan II (beta)
0.10
u
UG/L
4,4'-DDD (p.p'-DDD)
0.10
u
UG/L
Endosulfan Sulfate
0.10
UJ
UG/L
4,4'-DDT (p.p'-DDT)
0.50
UJ
UG/L
Methoxychlor
0.10
u
UG/L
Endrin Ketone
0.10
u
UG/L
Endrin Aldehyde
0.050
UJ
UG/L
alpha-Chlordane 12
0.050
UJ
UG/L
gamma-Chlordane 12
5.0
u
UG/L
Toxaphene
1.0
u
UG/L
PCB-1016 (Aroclor 1016)
2.0
u
UG/L
PCB-1221 (Aroclor 1221)
1.0
u
UG/L
PCB-1232 (Aroclor 1232)
1.0
u
UG/L
PCB-1242 (Aroclor 1242)
1.0
u
UG/L
PCB-1248 (Aroclor 1248)
1.0
u
UG/L
PCB-1254 (Aroclor 1254)
1.0
u
UG/L
PCB-1260 (Aroclor 1260)
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
C-confirmed by GCMS | /1-when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents | /2-constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane rage 1 OT 1
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 10/31/2005 17:48
Sample 138 FY 2006
Project: 06-0044
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: King, Charles
Pesticides & Aroclors Scan
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Facility: Ciba-Geigy
Mcintosh, AL
Beginning: 10/13/2005 10:55
Program: SF
Case No: 34747
Ending:
Id/Station: CG01SWS/
Media: SURFACE WATER
D No: 3AX3
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
0.050
U
UG/L
alpha-BHC
0.050
U
UG/L
beta-BHC
0.050
U
UG/L
delta-BHC
0.050
UJ
UG/L
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
0.050
UJ
UG/L
Heptachlor
0.050
U
UG/L
Aldrin
0.050
U
UG/L
Heptachlor Epoxide
0.050
u
UG/L
Endosulfan I (alpha)
0.10
UJ
UG/L
Dieldrin
0.10
UJ
UG/L
4,4'-DDE (p.p'-DDE)
0.10
UJ
UG/L
Endrin
0.10
u
UG/L
Endosulfan II (beta)
0.10
u
UG/L
4,4'-DDD (p.p'-DDD)
0.10
u
UG/L
Endosulfan Sulfate
0.10
UJ
UG/L
4,4'-DDT (p.p'-DDT)
0.50
UJ
UG/L
Methoxychlor
0.10
u
UG/L
Endrin Ketone
0.10
u
UG/L
Endrin Aldehyde
0.050
UJ
UG/L
alpha-Chlordane 12
0.050
UJ
UG/L
gamma-Chlordane 12
5.0
u
UG/L
Toxaphene
1.0
u
UG/L
PCB-1016 (Aroclor 1016)
2.0
u
UG/L
PCB-1221 (Aroclor 1221)
1.0
u
UG/L
PCB-1232 (Aroclor 1232)
1.0
u
UG/L
PCB-1242 (Aroclor 1242)
1.0
u
UG/L
PCB-1248 (Aroclor 1248)
1.0
u
UG/L
PCB-1254 (Aroclor 1254)
1.0
u
UG/L
PCB-1260 (Aroclor 1260)
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
C-confirmed by GCMS | /1-when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents | /2-constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane rage 1 OT 1
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 10/31/2005 17:48
Sample 139 FY 2006
Project: 06-0044
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: King, Charles
Pesticides & Aroclors Scan
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Facility: Ciba-Geigy
Mcintosh, AL
Beginning: 10/13/2005 12:20
Program: SF
Case No: 34747
Ending:
Id/Station: CG02SW/
Media: SURFACE WATER
D No: 3AX4
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
0.18
U
UG/L
alpha-BHC
0.050
U
UG/L
beta-BHC
0.045
J
UG/L
delta-BHC
0.050
UJ
UG/L
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
0.050
UJ
UG/L
Heptachlor
1.0
UG/L
Aldrin
0.13
U
UG/L
Heptachlor Epoxide
0.070
U
UG/L
Endosulfan I (alpha)
0.10
UJ
UG/L
Dieldrin
0.10
UJ
UG/L
4,4'-DDE (p.p'-DDE)
0.10
UJ
UG/L
Endrin
0.10
U
UG/L
Endosulfan II (beta)
0.10
u
UG/L
4,4'-DDD (p.p'-DDD)
0.11
u
UG/L
Endosulfan Sulfate
0.10
UJ
UG/L
4,4'-DDT (p.p'-DDT)
0.50
UJ
UG/L
Methoxychlor
0.10
u
UG/L
Endrin Ketone
0.10
u
UG/L
Endrin Aldehyde
0.050
UJ
UG/L
alpha-Chlordane 12
0.074
UJ
UG/L
gamma-Chlordane 12
5.0
u
UG/L
Toxaphene
1.0
u
UG/L
PCB-1016 (Aroclor 1016)
2.0
u
UG/L
PCB-1221 (Aroclor 1221)
1.0
u
UG/L
PCB-1232 (Aroclor 1232)
1.0
u
UG/L
PCB-1242 (Aroclor 1242)
1.0
u
UG/L
PCB-1248 (Aroclor 1248)
1.0
u
UG/L
PCB-1254 (Aroclor 1254)
1.0
u
UG/L
PCB-1260 (Aroclor 1260)
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
C-confirmed by GCMS | /1-when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents | /2-constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane rage 1 OT 1
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/17/2005 15:30
Sample 130 FY 2006 Project: 06-0058
SPECIFIED TESTS
Facility: Ciba-Geigy Mcintosh, AL
Program: SF SAS Number:HERB
Id/Station: CG01SD /
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 01SD Org Contractor: UGA
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
1300 UR UG/KG Diazinon
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: King, Charles
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 11:40
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
C-confirmed by GCMS | /1-when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents | /2-constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane rage 1 OT 1
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/17/2005 15:30
Sample 131 FY 2006 Project: 06-0058
SPECIFIED TESTS
Facility: Ciba-Geigy Mcintosh, AL
Program: SF SAS Number:HERB
Id/Station: CG01SDS /
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 01SDS Org Contractor: UGA
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
1300 UR UG/KG Diazinon
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: King, Charles
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 11:40
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
C-confirmed by GCMS | /1-when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents | /2-constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane rage 1 OT 1
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/17/2005 15:30
Sample 132 FY 2006 Project: 06-0058
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
SPECIFIED TESTS
Requestor: King, Charles
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Facility: Ciba-Geigy Mcintosh, AL
Beginning: 10/13/2005 10:55
Program: SF
SAS Number:HERB
Ending:
Id/Station: CG01SW/
Media: SURFACE WATER D No: 01SW
Org Contractor: UGA
RESULTS
62 UR
UNITS
UG/L
ANALYTE
Diazinon
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
C-confirmed by GCMS | /1-when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents | /2-constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane rage 1 OT 1
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/17/2005 15:30
Sample 133 FY 2006
SPECIFIED TESTS
Facility: Ciba-Geigy
Program: SF
Id/Station: CG01SWS/
Media: SURFACE WATER
Project: 06-0058
Mcintosh, AL
D No: 01SWS
SAS Number:HERB
Org Contractor: UGA
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: King, Charles
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 10:55
Ending:
RESULTS UNITS
62 UR UG/L
ANALYTE
Diazinon
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
C-confirmed by GCMS | /1-when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents | /2-constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane rage 1 OT 1
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/17/2005 15:30
Sample 134 FY 2006 Project: 06-0058
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
SPECIFIED TESTS
Requestor: King, Charles
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Facility: Ciba-Geigy Mcintosh, AL
Beginning: 10/13/2005 12:20
Program: SF
SAS Number:HERB
Ending:
Id/Station: CG02SW/
Media: SURFACE WATER D No: 02SW
Org Contractor: UGA
RESULTS
4.2 NJ
UNITS
UG/L
ANALYTE
Diazinon
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
C-confirmed by GCMS | /1-when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents | /2-constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane rage 1 OT 1
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/17/2005 15:30
SAS Number:HERB
Org Contractor: UGA
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
1000 u
UG/KG
Butylate
R
UG/KG
Molinate
1000 U
UG/KG
Cycloate
1000 u
UG/KG
EPTC (Eptam)
1000 u
UG/KG
Pebulate (Tillam)
1000 UR
UG/KG
Vernam (Vernolate)
Sample 142 FY 2006 Project: 06-0047
SPECIFIED TESTS
Facility: Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek Swamp) NPL, AL
Program: SF
Id/Station: SC01SD /
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 01SD
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 10:10
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
MOLINATE - CONFLICTING INFO FROM GC-NPD AND GC-MS.
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
C-confirmed by GCMS | /1-when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents | /2-constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane rage 1 OT 1
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/17/2005 15:30
SAS Number:HERB
Org Contractor: UGA
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
2600 C
UG/KG
Butylate
R
UG/KG
Molinate
1300 C
UG/KG
Cycloate
1500 C
UG/KG
EPTC (Eptam)
340 CJ
UG/KG
Pebulate (Tillam)
650 CJ
UG/KG
Vernam (Vernolate)
Sample 143 FY 2006 Project: 06-0047
SPECIFIED TESTS
Facility: Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek Swamp) NPL, AL
Program: SF
Id/Station: SC02SD /
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 02SD
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 10:25
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
MOLINATE - CONFLICTING INFO FROM GC-NPD AND GC-MS.
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
C-confirmed by GCMS | /1-when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents | /2-constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane rage 1 OT 1
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/17/2005 15:30
SAS Number:HERB
Org Contractor: UGA
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
6800 C
UG/KG
Butylate
R
UG/KG
Molinate
630 CJ
UG/KG
Cycloate
1300 C
UG/KG
EPTC (Eptam)
290 CJ
UG/KG
Pebulate (Tillam)
670 CJ
UG/KG
Vernam (Vernolate)
Sample 144 FY 2006 Project: 06-0047
SPECIFIED TESTS
Facility: Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek Swamp) NPL, AL
Program: SF
Id/Station: SC03SD /
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 03SD
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 10:55
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
MOLINATE - CONFLICTING INFO FROM GC-NPD AND GC-MS.
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
C-confirmed by GCMS | /1-when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents | /2-constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane rage 1 OT 1
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/17/2005 15:30
Sample 145 FY 2006 Project: 06-0047
SPECIFIED TESTS
Facility: Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek Swamp) NPL, AL
Program: SF
Id/Station: SC04SD /
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 04SD
SAS Number:HERB
Org Contractor: UGA
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 11:15
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS UNITS
1400 CJA UG/KG
R UG/KG
1000 U UG/KG
300 CJA UG/KG
1000 U UG/KG
630 UR UG/KG
ANALYTE
Butylate
Molinate
Cycloate
EPTC (Eptam)
Pebulate (Tillam)
Vernam (Vernolate)
MOLINATE - CONFLICTING INFO FROM GC-NPD AND GC-MS.
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
C-confirmed by GCMS | /1-when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents | /2-constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane rage 1 OT 1
-------
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/25/2005 14:03
Sample 146 FY 2006 Project: 06-0037
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant) NPL , AL
Program: SF Case No: 34740
Id/Station: QA01TB/
Media: TRIP BLANK-SOIL D No: 3B23
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
12
U
UG/KG
Dichlorodifluoromethane
12
U
UG/KG
Dibromochloromethane
12
U
UG/KG
Chloromethane
12
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
12
U
UG/KG
Vinyl Chloride
12
U
UG/KG
Chlorobenzene
12
U
UG/KG
Bromomethane
12
U
UG/KG
Ethyl Benzene
12
U
UG/KG
Chloroethane
12
U
UG/KG
Total Xylenes
12
U
UG/KG
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon11)
12
U
UG/KG
Styrene
12
U
UG/KG
1,1-Dichloroethene (1,1-Dichloroethylene)
12
U
UG/KG
Bromoform
12
U
UG/KG
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
12
U
UG/KG
Isopropylbenzene
15
J
UG/KG
Acetone
12
U
UG/KG
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
12
U
UG/KG
Carbon Disulfide
12
U
UG/KG
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
12
U
UG/KG
Methyl Acetate
12
U
UG/KG
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
12
U
UG/KG
Methylene Chloride
12
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
12
U
UG/KG
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
12
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
12
U
UG/KG
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
12
U
UG/KG
1,2,4-T richlorobenzene
12
U
UG/KG
1,1-Dichloroethane
NA
UG/KG
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
12
U
UG/KG
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
9
%
% Moisture
12
UJ
NA
UG/KG
UG/KG
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
12
U
UG/KG
Chloroform
12
U
UG/KG
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
12
U
UG/KG
Cyclohexane
12
U
UG/KG
Carbon Tetrachloride
12
U
UG/KG
Benzene
12
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dichloroethane
12
U
UG/KG
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
12
U
UG/KG
Methylcyclohexane
12
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dichloropropane
12
U
UG/KG
Bromodichloromethane
12
U
UG/KG
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
12
U
UG/KG
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
12
U
UG/KG
Toluene
12
U
UG/KG
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
12
U
UG/KG
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
12
U
UG/KG
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
12
UJ
UG/KG
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 16:45
Ending:
Org Contractor: LIBRTY DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/25/2005 14:03
Sample 147 FY 2006 Project: 06-0037
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant) NPL , AL
Program: SF Case No: 34740
Id/Station: SL01SD / MD No: 3B24
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3B24
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 13:45
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
12
U
UG/KG
Dichlorodifluoromethane
12
U
UG/KG
Dibromochloromethane
12
U
UG/KG
Chloromethane
12
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
12
U
UG/KG
Vinyl Chloride
12
U
UG/KG
Chlorobenzene
12
U
UG/KG
Bromomethane
12
U
UG/KG
Ethyl Benzene
12
U
UG/KG
Chloroethane
12
U
UG/KG
Total Xylenes
12
U
UG/KG
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon11)
12
U
UG/KG
Styrene
12
U
UG/KG
1,1-Dichloroethene (1,1-Dichloroethylene)
12
U
UG/KG
Bromoform
12
U
UG/KG
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
12
U
UG/KG
Isopropylbenzene
12
UJ
UG/KG
Acetone
12
U
UG/KG
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
12
U
UG/KG
Carbon Disulfide
12
U
UG/KG
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
12
U
UG/KG
Methyl Acetate
12
U
UG/KG
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
12
U
UG/KG
Methylene Chloride
12
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
12
U
UG/KG
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
12
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
12
U
UG/KG
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
12
U
UG/KG
1,2,4-T richlorobenzene
12
U
UG/KG
1,1-Dichloroethane
NA
UG/KG
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
12
U
UG/KG
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
28
%
% Moisture
12
UJ
NA
UG/KG
UG/KG
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
12
U
UG/KG
Chloroform
12
U
UG/KG
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
12
U
UG/KG
Cyclohexane
12
U
UG/KG
Carbon Tetrachloride
12
U
UG/KG
Benzene
12
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dichloroethane
12
U
UG/KG
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
12
U
UG/KG
Methylcyclohexane
12
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dichloropropane
12
U
UG/KG
Bromodichloromethane
12
U
UG/KG
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
12
U
UG/KG
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
12
U
UG/KG
Toluene
12
U
UG/KG
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
12
U
UG/KG
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
12
U
UG/KG
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
12
UJ
UG/KG
Methyl Butyl Ketone
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/25/2005 14:03
Sample 147 FY 2006 Project: 06-0037
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant) NPL , AL
Program: SF Case No: 34740
Id/Station: SL01SD / MD No: 3B24
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3B24
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 13:45
Ending:
RESULTS UNITS
38 J UG/KG
N UG/KG
ANALYTE
3 UNKNOWNS
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/25/2005 14:03
Sample 148 FY 2006 Project: 06-0037
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant) NPL , AL
Program: SF Case No: 34740
Id/Station: SL02SD / MD No: 3B25
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3B25
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 14:35
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
12
U
UG/KG
Dichlorodifluoromethane
12
U
UG/KG
Dibromochloromethane
12
U
UG/KG
Chloromethane
12
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
12
U
UG/KG
Vinyl Chloride
12
U
UG/KG
Chlorobenzene
12
U
UG/KG
Bromomethane
12
U
UG/KG
Ethyl Benzene
12
U
UG/KG
Chloroethane
12
U
UG/KG
Total Xylenes
12
U
UG/KG
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon11)
12
U
UG/KG
Styrene
12
U
UG/KG
1,1-Dichloroethene (1,1-Dichloroethylene)
12
U
UG/KG
Bromoform
12
U
UG/KG
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
12
U
UG/KG
Isopropylbenzene
47
J
UG/KG
Acetone
12
U
UG/KG
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
12
U
UG/KG
Carbon Disulfide
12
U
UG/KG
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
12
U
UG/KG
Methyl Acetate
12
U
UG/KG
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
12
U
UG/KG
Methylene Chloride
12
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
12
U
UG/KG
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
12
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
12
U
UG/KG
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
12
U
UG/KG
1,2,4-T richlorobenzene
12
U
UG/KG
1,1-Dichloroethane
NA
UG/KG
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
12
U
UG/KG
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
28
%
% Moisture
12
UJ
NA
UG/KG
UG/KG
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
12
U
UG/KG
Chloroform
12
U
UG/KG
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
12
U
UG/KG
Cyclohexane
12
U
UG/KG
Carbon Tetrachloride
12
U
UG/KG
Benzene
12
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dichloroethane
12
U
UG/KG
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
12
U
UG/KG
Methylcyclohexane
12
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dichloropropane
12
U
UG/KG
Bromodichloromethane
12
U
UG/KG
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
12
U
UG/KG
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
20
UG/KG
Toluene
12
U
UG/KG
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
12
U
UG/KG
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
12
U
UG/KG
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
12
UJ
UG/KG
Methyl Butyl Ketone
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/25/2005 14:03
Sample 148 FY 2006 Project: 06-0037
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant) NPL , AL
Program: SF Case No: 34740
Id/Station: SL02SD / MD No: 3B25 Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3B25 Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
7
J
UG/KG
UNKNOWN
12
NJ
UG/KG
DIMETHYL SULFIDE
N
UG/KG
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 14:35
Ending:
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/25/2005 16:51
Sample 147 FY 2006 Project: 06-0037
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
SPECIFIED TESTS
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Facility: Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant) NPL
, AL
Beginning: 10/13/2005 13:45
Program: SF
Case No: 34740
Ending:
Id/Station: SL01SD /
MD No: 3B24
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Media: SEDIMENT
D No: 3B24
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS UNITS
0.87 J MG/KG
ANALYTE
Total Mercury
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/25/2005 16:51
Sample 148 FY 2006 Project: 06-0037
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
SPECIFIED TESTS
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Facility: Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant) NPL
, AL
Beginning: 10/13/2005 14:35
Program: SF
Case No: 34740
Ending:
Id/Station: SL02SD /
MD No: 3B25
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Media: SEDIMENT
D No: 3B25
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS UNITS
0.60 UJ MG/KG
ANALYTE
Total Mercury
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
CLASSICALS/NUTRIENTS SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/25/2005 16:57
Sample 147 FY 2006 Project: 06-0037
SPECIFIED TESTS
Facility: Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant) NPL , AL
Program: SF Case No: 34740
Id/Station: SL01SD / MD No: 3B24 Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3B24 Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
1.6 U MG/KG Cyanide
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 13:45
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
CLASSICALS/NUTRIENTS SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/25/2005 16:57
Sample 148 FY 2006 Project: 06-0037
SPECIFIED TESTS
Facility: Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant) NPL , AL
Program: SF Case No: 34740
Id/Station: SL02SD / MD No: 3B25 Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3B25 Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
1.5 U MG/KG Cyanide
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 14:35
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/03/2005 19:02
Sample 125 FY 2006 Project: 06-0038
Extractables Scan
Facility: Redwing Carrier Inc. NPL Site Saraland, AL
Program: SF Case No: 34741
Id/Station: RC01SD/
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3B44
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
690
U
UG/KG
Benzaldehyde
690 U
UG/KG
Dibenzofuran
690
U
UG/KG
Phenol
690 U
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
690
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether
690 U
UG/KG
Diethyl Phthalate
690
U
UG/KG
2-Chlorophenol
690 U
UG/KG
Fluorene
690
U
UG/KG
2-Methylphenol
690 U
UG/KG
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
690
UJ
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
1700 UJ
UG/KG
4-Nitroaniline
690
U
UG/KG
Acetophenone
1700 U
UG/KG
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol
690
U
UG/KG
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol
690 U
UG/KG
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine
690
U
UG/KG
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine
NA
UG/KG
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
690
U
UG/KG
Hexachloroethane
690 U
UG/KG
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
690
U
UG/KG
Nitrobenzene
690 U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
690
U
UG/KG
Isophorone
690 U
UG/KG
Atrazine
690
U
UG/KG
2-Nitrophenol
1700 U
UG/KG
Pentachlorophenol
690
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dimethylphenol
690 U
UG/KG
Phenanthrene
690
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane
690 U
UG/KG
Anthracene
690
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dichlorophenol
690 U
UG/KG
Carbazole
690
U
UG/KG
Naphthalene
690 U
UG/KG
Di-n-Butylphthalate
690
U
UG/KG
4-Chloroaniline
310 J
UG/KG
Fluoranthene
690
U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobutadiene
410 J
UG/KG
Pyrene
690
U
UG/KG
Caprolactam
690 U
UG/KG
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
690
u
UG/KG
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
690 U
UG/KG
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
690
u
UG/KG
2-Methylnaphthalene
150 J
UG/KG
Benzo(a)Anthracene
690
u
UG/KG
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)
310 J
UG/KG
Chrysene
690
u
UG/KG
2,4,6-T richlorophenol
690 U
UG/KG
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
1700
u
UG/KG
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
690 U
UG/KG
Di-n-Octylphthalate
690
u
UG/KG
1,1 -Biphenyl
260 J
UG/KG
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
690
u
UG/KG
2-Chloronaphthalene
290 J
UG/KG
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
1700
u
UG/KG
2-Nitroaniline
150 J
UG/KG
Benzo-a-Pyrene
690
u
UG/KG
Dimethyl Phthalate
690 U
UG/KG
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
690
u
UG/KG
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
690 UJ
UG/KG
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
690
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthylene
690 U
UG/KG
Benzo(ghi)Perylene
1700
u
UG/KG
3-Nitroaniline
52
%
% Moisture
690
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthene
1700
u
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrophenol
1700
u
UG/KG
4-Nitrophenol
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/12/2005 14:30
Ending:
Org Contractor: LIBRTY DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/03/2005 19:02
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/12/2005 14:30
Ending:
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
17000
J
UG/KG
22 UNKNOWNS
530
NJ
UG/KG
Z-7-HEXADECENOIC ACID
770
NJ
UG/KG
N-HEXADECANOIC ACID
430
NJ
UG/KG
OLEIC ACID
270
J
UG/KG
METHYLCHRYSENE
1200
NJ
UG/KG
1-EICOSANOL
280
NJ
UG/KG
1-PENTADECANETHIOL
1200
NJ
UG/KG
STIGMAST-4-EN-3-ONE
1400
NJ
UG/KG
UNKNOWN CARBOXYLIC ACID
N
UG/KG
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
Sample 125 FY 2006 Project: 06-0038
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Redwing Carrier Inc. NPL Site Saraland, AL
Program: SF Case No: 34741
Id/Station: RC01SD/
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3B44
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/03/2005 19:02
Sample 126 FY 2006 Project: 06-0038
Extractables Scan
Facility: Redwing Carrier Inc. NPL Site Saraland, AL
Program: SF Case No: 34741
Id/Station: RC02SD /
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3B45
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
490
U
UG/KG
Benzaldehyde
490 U
UG/KG
Dibenzofuran
490
U
UG/KG
Phenol
490 U
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
490
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether
490 U
UG/KG
Diethyl Phthalate
490
U
UG/KG
2-Chlorophenol
490 U
UG/KG
Fluorene
490
U
UG/KG
2-Methylphenol
490 U
UG/KG
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
490
UJ
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
1200 UJ
UG/KG
4-Nitroaniline
490
U
UG/KG
Acetophenone
1200 U
UG/KG
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol
490
U
UG/KG
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol
490 U
UG/KG
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine
490
U
UG/KG
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine
NA
UG/KG
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
490
U
UG/KG
Hexachloroethane
490 U
UG/KG
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
490
U
UG/KG
Nitrobenzene
490 U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
490
U
UG/KG
Isophorone
490 U
UG/KG
Atrazine
490
U
UG/KG
2-Nitrophenol
1200 U
UG/KG
Pentachlorophenol
490
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dimethylphenol
490 U
UG/KG
Phenanthrene
490
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane
490 U
UG/KG
Anthracene
490
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dichlorophenol
490 U
UG/KG
Carbazole
490
U
UG/KG
Naphthalene
490 U
UG/KG
Di-n-Butylphthalate
490
U
UG/KG
4-Chloroaniline
130 J
UG/KG
Fluoranthene
490
U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobutadiene
130 J
UG/KG
Pyrene
490
U
UG/KG
Caprolactam
490 U
UG/KG
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
490
u
UG/KG
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
490 U
UG/KG
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
490
u
UG/KG
2-Methylnaphthalene
490 UR
UG/KG
Benzo(a)Anthracene
490
u
UG/KG
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)
100 J
UG/KG
Chrysene
490
u
UG/KG
2,4,6-T richlorophenol
490 U
UG/KG
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
1200
u
UG/KG
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
490 U
UG/KG
Di-n-Octylphthalate
490
u
UG/KG
1,1 -Biphenyl
110 J
UG/KG
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
490
u
UG/KG
2-Chloronaphthalene
100 J
UG/KG
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
1200
u
UG/KG
2-Nitroaniline
490 U
UG/KG
Benzo-a-Pyrene
490
u
UG/KG
Dimethyl Phthalate
490 U
UG/KG
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
490
u
UG/KG
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
490 UJ
UG/KG
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
490
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthylene
490 U
UG/KG
Benzo(ghi)Perylene
1200
u
UG/KG
3-Nitroaniline
32
%
% Moisture
490
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthene
1200
u
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrophenol
1200
u
UG/KG
4-Nitrophenol
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/12/2005 14:40
Ending:
Org Contractor: LIBRTY DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/03/2005 19:02
Sample 126 FY 2006 Project: 06-0038
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Redwing Carrier Inc. NPL Site Saraland, AL
Program: SF Case No: 34741
Id/Station: RC02SD /
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3B45 Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
2900 J
UG/KG
14 UNKNOWNS
220 NJ
UG/KG
9-OCTADECENOIC ACID, (E)-
220 NJ
UG/KG
HEPTADECANOIC ACID
380 NJ
UG/KG
PERYLENE
290 NJ
UG/KG
CHOLESTEROL
150 NJ
UG/KG
CAMPESTEROL
130 NJ
UG/KG
(1S,2E,4S,5R,7E,11E)-CEMBRA-2,7,11-TRIEN-4,5,DIOL
380 NJ
UG/KG
STIGMAST-4-EN-3-ONE
N
UG/KG
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/12/2005 14:40
Ending:
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/03/2005 19:02
Sample 125 FY 2006 Project: 06-0038
Pesticides & Aroclors Scan
Facility: Redwing Carrier Inc. NPL Site
Program: SF
Id/Station: RC01SD/
Media: SEDIMENT
Saraland, AL
Case No: 34741
D No: 3B44
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/12/2005 14:30
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
3.5
U
UG/KG
alpha-BHC
3.5
U
UG/KG
beta-BHC
3.5
U
UG/KG
delta-BHC
3.5
U
UG/KG
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
3.5
U
UG/KG
Heptachlor
3.5
U
UG/KG
Aldrin
3.5
U
UG/KG
Heptachlor Epoxide
3.5
U
UG/KG
Endosulfan I (alpha)
4.1
J
UG/KG
Dieldrin
2.3
J
UG/KG
4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE)
6.9
U
UG/KG
Endrin
6.9
U
UG/KG
Endosulfan II (beta)
6.9
U
UG/KG
4,4'-DDD (p,p'-DDD)
6.9
U
UG/KG
Endosulfan Sulfate
6.9
U
UG/KG
4,4'-DDT (p, p'-DDT)
35
U
UG/KG
Methoxychlor
6.9
U
UG/KG
Endrin Ketone
6.9
U
UG/KG
Endrin Aldehyde
13
U
UG/KG
alpha-Chlordane /2
9.1
UG/KG
gamma-Chlordane /2
350
U
UG/KG
Toxaphene
69
U
UG/KG
PCB-1016 (Aroclor 1016)
140
U
UG/KG
PCB-1221 (Aroclor 1221)
69
U
UG/KG
PCB-1232 (Aroclor 1232)
69
U
UG/KG
PCB-1242 (Aroclor 1242)
69
U
UG/KG
PCB-1248 (Aroclor 1248)
69
U
UG/KG
PCB-1254 (Aroclor 1254)
69
U
UG/KG
PCB-1260 (Aroclor 1260)
52
%
% Moisture
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
C-confirmed by GCMS | /1-when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents | /2-constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane rage 1 OT 1
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/03/2005 19:02
Sample 126 FY 2006 Project: 06-0038
Pesticides & Aroclors Scan
Facility: Redwing Carrier Inc. NPL Site
Program: SF
Id/Station: RC02SD /
Media: SEDIMENT
Saraland, AL
Case No: 34741
D No: 3B45
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/12/2005 14:40
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
2.5
U
UG/KG
alpha-BHC
2.5
U
UG/KG
beta-BHC
2.5
U
UG/KG
delta-BHC
2.5
U
UG/KG
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
2.5
U
UG/KG
Heptachlor
2.5
U
UG/KG
Aldrin
2.5
U
UG/KG
Heptachlor Epoxide
2.5
U
UG/KG
Endosulfan I (alpha)
2.1
NJ
UG/KG
Dieldrin
4.9
U
UG/KG
4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE)
4.9
U
UG/KG
Endrin
4.9
U
UG/KG
Endosulfan II (beta)
4.9
U
UG/KG
4,4'-DDD (p,p'-DDD)
4.9
U
UG/KG
Endosulfan Sulfate
4.9
U
UG/KG
4,4'-DDT (p, p'-DDT)
25
U
UG/KG
Methoxychlor
4.9
U
UG/KG
Endrin Ketone
4.9
U
UG/KG
Endrin Aldehyde
2.5
U
UG/KG
alpha-Chlordane /2
2.5
U
UG/KG
gamma-Chlordane /2
250
U
UG/KG
Toxaphene
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1016 (Aroclor 1016)
99
U
UG/KG
PCB-1221 (Aroclor 1221)
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1232 (Aroclor 1232)
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1242 (Aroclor 1242)
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1248 (Aroclor 1248)
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1254 (Aroclor 1254)
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1260 (Aroclor 1260)
32
%
% Moisture
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
C-confirmed by GCMS | /1-when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents | /2-constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane rage 1 OT 1
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/17/2005 15:30
Sample 128 FY 2006 Project: 06-0048
SPECIFIED TESTS
Facility: Redwing Carrier Inc. NPL Site Saraland, AL
Program: SF
Id/Station: RC01SD/
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 01SD
SAS Number:HERB
Org Contractor: UGA
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/12/2005 14:30
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS UNITS
980 UR UG/KG
ANALYTE
Vernam (Vernolate)
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
C-confirmed by GCMS | /1-when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents | /2-constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane rage 1 OT 1
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/17/2005 15:30
Sample 129 FY 2006 Project: 06-0048
SPECIFIED TESTS
Facility: Redwing Carrier Inc. NPL Site Saraland, AL
Program: SF
Id/Station: RC02SD /
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 02SD
SAS Number:HERB
Org Contractor: UGA
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/12/2005 14:40
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS UNITS
700 UR UG/KG
ANALYTE
Vernam (Vernolate)
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
C-confirmed by GCMS | /1-when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents | /2-constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane rage 1 OT 1
-------
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/25/2005 16:51
Sample 121 FY 2006 Project: 06-0039
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Perdido Groundwater NPL Perdido, AL
Program: SF Case No: 34742
Id/Station: PG02GW/
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 3B55
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
10
u
UG/L
Dichlorodifluoromethane
10
u
UG/L
Dibromochloromethane
10
u
UG/L
Chloromethane
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
10
u
UG/L
Vinyl Chloride
10
u
UG/L
Chlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
Bromomethane
10
u
UG/L
Ethyl Benzene
10
u
UG/L
Chloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Total Xylenes
10
u
UG/L
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon11)
10
u
UG/L
Styrene
10
u
UG/L
1,1-Dichloroethene (1,1-Dichloroethylene)
10
u
UG/L
Bromoform
10
u
UG/L
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
10
u
UG/L
Isopropylbenzene
10
u
UG/L
Acetone
10
u
UG/L
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Carbon Disulfide
10
u
UG/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
Methyl Acetate
10
u
UG/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
Methylene Chloride
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
10
u
UG/L
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
10
u
UG/L
1,2,4-T richlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
1,1-Dichloroethane
NA
UG/L
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
10
u
NA
UG/L
UG/L
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
10
u
UG/L
Chloroform
10
u
UG/L
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Cyclohexane
10
u
UG/L
Carbon Tetrachloride
10
u
UG/L
Benzene
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dichloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
10
u
UG/L
Methylcyclohexane
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dichloropropane
10
u
UG/L
Bromodichloromethane
10
u
UG/L
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10
u
UG/L
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
10
u
UG/L
Toluene
10
u
UG/L
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
10
u
UG/L
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
10
u
UG/L
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 08:35
Ending:
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/25/2005 16:51
Sample 122 FY 2006 Project: 06-0039
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Perdido Groundwater NPL Perdido, AL
Program: SF Case No: 34742
Id/Station: PG01GW/
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 3B56
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
10
u
UG/L
Dichlorodifluoromethane
10
u
UG/L
Dibromochloromethane
10
u
UG/L
Chloromethane
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
10
u
UG/L
Vinyl Chloride
10
u
UG/L
Chlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
Bromomethane
10
u
UG/L
Ethyl Benzene
10
u
UG/L
Chloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Total Xylenes
10
u
UG/L
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon11)
10
u
UG/L
Styrene
10
u
UG/L
1,1-Dichloroethene (1,1-Dichloroethylene)
10
u
UG/L
Bromoform
10
u
UG/L
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
10
u
UG/L
Isopropylbenzene
10
u
UG/L
Acetone
10
u
UG/L
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Carbon Disulfide
10
u
UG/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
Methyl Acetate
10
u
UG/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
Methylene Chloride
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
10
u
UG/L
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
10
u
UG/L
1,2,4-T richlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
1,1-Dichloroethane
NA
UG/L
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
10
u
NA
UG/L
UG/L
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
10
u
UG/L
Chloroform
10
u
UG/L
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Cyclohexane
10
u
UG/L
Carbon Tetrachloride
10
u
UG/L
Benzene
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dichloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
10
u
UG/L
Methylcyclohexane
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dichloropropane
10
u
UG/L
Bromodichloromethane
10
u
UG/L
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10
u
UG/L
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
10
u
UG/L
Toluene
10
u
UG/L
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
10
u
UG/L
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
10
u
UG/L
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 08:30
Ending:
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/25/2005 16:51
Sample 123 FY 2006 Project: 06-0039
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Perdido Groundwater NPL
Program: SF
Id/Station: QA01TB/
Media: TRIP BLANK - WATER
Perdido, AL
Case No: 34742
D No: 3B57
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 16:59
Ending:
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
10
u
UG/L
Dichlorodifluoromethane
10
u
UG/L
Dibromochloromethane
10
u
UG/L
Chloromethane
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
10
u
UG/L
Vinyl Chloride
10
u
UG/L
Chlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
Bromomethane
10
u
UG/L
Ethyl Benzene
10
u
UG/L
Chloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Total Xylenes
10
u
UG/L
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon11)
10
u
UG/L
Styrene
10
u
UG/L
1,1-Dichloroethene (1,1-Dichloroethylene)
10
u
UG/L
Bromoform
10
u
UG/L
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
10
u
UG/L
Isopropylbenzene
10
u
UG/L
Acetone
10
u
UG/L
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Carbon Disulfide
10
u
UG/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
Methyl Acetate
10
u
UG/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
Methylene Chloride
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
10
u
UG/L
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
10
u
UG/L
1,2,4-T richlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
1,1-Dichloroethane
NA
UG/L
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/L
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
10
u
NA
UG/L
UG/L
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
10
u
UG/L
Chloroform
10
u
UG/L
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Cyclohexane
10
u
UG/L
Carbon Tetrachloride
10
u
UG/L
Benzene
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dichloroethane
10
u
UG/L
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
10
u
UG/L
Methylcyclohexane
10
u
UG/L
1,2-Dichloropropane
10
u
UG/L
Bromodichloromethane
10
u
UG/L
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10
u
UG/L
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
10
u
UG/L
Toluene
10
u
UG/L
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
10
u
UG/L
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
10
UJ
UG/L
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
10
u
UG/L
Methyl Butyl Ketone
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 18:02
Sample 161 FY 2006 Project: 06-0040
Extractables Scan
Facility: American Creosote Works Inc
Program: SF
Id/Station: AC01SD /
Media: SEDIMENT
Louisville, MS
Case No: 34743
D No: 3AP4
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 09:40
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
12000
U
UG/KG
Benzaldehyde
270000
UG/KG
Dibenzofuran
12000
U
UG/KG
Phenol
12000
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
12000
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether
12000
U
UG/KG
Diethyl Phthalate
12000
U
UG/KG
2-Chlorophenol
340000
UG/KG
Fluorene
12000
U
UG/KG
2-Methylphenol
12000
U
UG/KG
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
12000
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
30000
U
UG/KG
4-Nitroaniline
3400
J
UG/KG
Acetophenone
30000
U
UG/KG
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol
12000
U
UG/KG
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol
12000
U
UG/KG
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine
12000
U
UG/KG
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine
NA
UG/KG
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
12000
U
UG/KG
Hexachloroethane
12000
U
UG/KG
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
12000
U
UG/KG
Nitrobenzene
12000
U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
12000
U
UG/KG
Isophorone
12000
U
UG/KG
Atrazine
12000
U
UG/KG
2-Nitrophenol
30000
U
UG/KG
Pentachlorophenol
2500
J
UG/KG
2,4-Dimethylphenol
960000
UG/KG
Phenanthrene
12000
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane
140000
UG/KG
Anthracene
12000
u
UG/KG
2,4-Dichlorophenol
66000
J
UG/KG
Carbazole
1300000
UG/KG
Naphthalene
12000
U
UG/KG
Di-n-Butylphthalate
12000
u
UG/KG
4-Chloroaniline
440000
UG/KG
Fluoranthene
12000
u
UG/KG
Hexachlorobutadiene
250000
UG/KG
Pyrene
12000
u
UG/KG
Caprolactam
12000
U
UG/KG
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
12000
u
UG/KG
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
12000
UJ
UG/KG
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
350000
UG/KG
2-Methylnaphthalene
83000
UG/KG
Benzo(a)Anthracene
12000
u
UG/KG
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)
77000
UG/KG
Chrysene
12000
u
UG/KG
2,4,6-T richlorophenol
12000
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
30000
u
UG/KG
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
12000
U
UG/KG
Di-n-Octylphthalate
64000
UG/KG
1,1 -Biphenyl
36000
UG/KG
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
12000
u
UG/KG
2-Chloronaphthalene
33000
UG/KG
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
30000
u
UG/KG
2-Nitroaniline
34000
UG/KG
Benzo-a-Pyrene
12000
u
UG/KG
Dimethyl Phthalate
15000
UG/KG
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
12000
u
UG/KG
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
5900
J
UG/KG
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
22000
UG/KG
Acenaphthylene
11000
J
UG/KG
Benzo(ghi)Perylene
30000
u
UG/KG
3-Nitroaniline
17
%
% Moisture
330000
UG/KG
Acenaphthene
30000
UJ
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrophenol
30000
u
UG/KG
4-Nitrophenol
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 18:02
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 09:40
Ending:
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
54000
NJ
UG/KG
BENZO [B] THIOPHENE
140000
NJ
UG/KG
BENZOCYCLOHEPTATRIENE
37000
NJ
UG/KG
NAPHTHALENE, 1,2-DIMETHYL-
82000
NJ
UG/KG
NAPHTHALENE, 1,5-DIMETHYL-
110000
NJ
UG/KG
NAPHTHALENE-DIMETHYL 2 ISOMERS
51000
NJ
UG/KG
NAPHTHALENE, 2,6-DIMETHYL-
31000
NJ
UG/KG
NAPHTHALENE, 1,4,6-TRIMETHYL
25000
NJ
UG/KG
SUBSTITUTED BENZENE
61000
NJ
UG/KG
FLUORENE, 2.4A-DIHYDRO-
29000
NJ
UG/KG
NAPTHALENE, 1-(2-PROPENYL)-
130000
NJ
UG/KG
FLUOREN-OLS 2 ISOMERS
42000
NJ
UG/KG
1,3,5,7-CYCLOOCTATETRAENE, 1-PHENYL-
86000
NJ
UG/KG
FLUORENES-METHYL-2 ISOMERS
38000
J
UG/KG
METHYLFLUORENE
200000
J
UG/KG
4 UNKNOWNS
100000
NJ
UG/KG
DIBENZOTHIOPHENE
34000
J
UG/KG
ETHENYLANTHRACENE
140000
NJ
UG/KG
ANTHRACENE, 2-METHYL-
32000
NJ
UG/KG
NAPHTHO [2,3-B] NORBORNADIENE
29000
NJ
UG/KG
1H-CYCLOPROPA [L] PHENANTHRNE
42000
NJ
UG/KG
2-PHENYLNAPHTHALENE
76000
NJ
UG/KG
11H-BENZO [A] FLUORENE
58000
J
UG/KG
BENZOFLUORENE
N
UG/KG
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
Sample 161 FY 2006 Project: 06-0040
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: American Creosote Works Inc Louisville, MS
Program: SF Case No: 34743
Id/Station: AC01SD /
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3AP4
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 18:02
Sample 162 FY 2006 Project: 06-0040
Extractables Scan
Facility: American Creosote Works Inc
Program: SF
Id/Station: AC01SDS /
Media: SEDIMENT
Louisville, MS
Case No: 34743
D No: 3AP5
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 09:40
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
12000
U
UG/KG
Benzaldehyde
290000
UG/KG
Dibenzofuran
12000
U
UG/KG
Phenol
12000
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
12000
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether
12000
U
UG/KG
Diethyl Phthalate
12000
U
UG/KG
2-Chlorophenol
380000
UG/KG
Fluorene
12000
U
UG/KG
2-Methylphenol
12000
U
UG/KG
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
12000
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
31000
U
UG/KG
4-Nitroaniline
4300
J
UG/KG
Acetophenone
31000
U
UG/KG
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol
12000
U
UG/KG
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol
12000
U
UG/KG
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine
12000
U
UG/KG
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine
NA
UG/KG
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
12000
U
UG/KG
Hexachloroethane
12000
U
UG/KG
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
12000
U
UG/KG
Nitrobenzene
12000
U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
12000
U
UG/KG
Isophorone
12000
U
UG/KG
Atrazine
12000
U
UG/KG
2-Nitrophenol
31000
U
UG/KG
Pentachlorophenol
2700
J
UG/KG
2,4-Dimethylphenol
1000000
UG/KG
Phenanthrene
12000
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane
150000
UG/KG
Anthracene
12000
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dichlorophenol
63000
J
UG/KG
Carbazole
1400000
UG/KG
Naphthalene
12000
U
UG/KG
Di-n-Butylphthalate
12000
u
UG/KG
4-Chloroaniline
480000
UG/KG
Fluoranthene
12000
u
UG/KG
Hexachlorobutadiene
280000
UG/KG
Pyrene
12000
u
UG/KG
Caprolactam
12000
U
UG/KG
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
12000
u
UG/KG
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
12000
UJ
UG/KG
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
400000
UG/KG
2-Methylnaphthalene
86000
UG/KG
Benzo(a)Anthracene
12000
u
UG/KG
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)
76000
UG/KG
Chrysene
12000
u
UG/KG
2,4,6-T richlorophenol
12000
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
31000
u
UG/KG
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
12000
U
UG/KG
Di-n-Octylphthalate
64000
UG/KG
1,1 -Biphenyl
35000
UG/KG
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
12000
u
UG/KG
2-Chloronaphthalene
38000
UG/KG
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
31000
u
UG/KG
2-Nitroaniline
35000
UG/KG
Benzo-a-Pyrene
12000
u
UG/KG
Dimethyl Phthalate
13000
UG/KG
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
12000
u
UG/KG
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
5200
J
UG/KG
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
22000
UG/KG
Acenaphthylene
10000
J
UG/KG
Benzo(ghi)Perylene
31000
u
UG/KG
3-Nitroaniline
19
%
% Moisture
380000
UG/KG
Acenaphthene
31000
UJ
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrophenol
31000
u
UG/KG
4-Nitrophenol
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 18:02
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 09:40
Ending:
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
29000
NJ
UG/KG
2,4-DIMETHYLSTYRENE
50000
NJ
UG/KG
BENZO [B] THIOPHENE
140000
NJ
UG/KG
NAPHTHALENE, 1-METHYL-
210000
NJ
UG/KG
NAPHTHALENES, -DIMETHYL-3 ISOMERS
34000
NJ
UG/KG
NAPHTHALENE, 1,6-DIMETHYL-
30000
NJ
UG/KG
NAPHTHALENE, 1,4,5-TRIMETHYL-
58000
NJ
UG/KG
1,1-BIPHENYL, 2-METHYL-
26000
NJ
UG/KG
NAPHTHALENE, 1-(2-PROPENYL)-
53000
NJ
UG/KG
9H-FLUOREN-9-OL
75000
NJ
UG/KG
DIBENZOFURAN, 4-METHYL-
40000
NJ
UG/KG
1,3,5,7-CYCLOOCTATETRAENE, 1-PHENYL
89000
NJ
UG/KG
FLUORENE, -METHYL- 2 ISOMERS
35000
NJ
UG/KG
9H-FLUORENE, 1-METHYL-
170000
J
UG/KG
5 UNKNOWNS
130000
NJ
UG/KG
DIBENZOTHIOPHENE
29000
NJ
UG/KG
DIBENZO [A,E] CYCLOOCTENE
130000
NJ
UG/KG
ANTHRACENE, -METHYL-2 ISOMERS
26000
NJ
UG/KG
PHENANTHRENE, 2-METHYL-
100000
J
UG/KG
CYCLOPENTAPHENANTHRENE
80000
NJ
UG/KG
11H-BENZO [A] FLUORENE
65000
J
UG/KG
BENZOFLUORENE
27000
NJ
UG/KG
PYRENE, 2-METHYL-
N
UG/KG
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
Sample 162 FY 2006 Project: 06-0040
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: American Creosote Works Inc Louisville, MS
Program: SF Case No: 34743
Id/Station: AC01SDS /
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3AP5
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 18:02
Sample 163 FY 2006 Project: 06-0040
Extractables Scan
Facility: American Creosote Works Inc
Program: SF
Id/Station: AC01SW/
Media: SURFACE WATER
Louisville, MS
Case No: 34743
D No: 3AP6
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 09:30
Ending:
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
5ULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
10 UJ
UG/L
Benzaldehyde
10 u
UG/L
Dibenzofuran
10 u
UG/L
Phenol
10 u
UG/L
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
10 u
UG/L
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether
10 u
UG/L
Diethyl Phthalate
10 u
UG/L
2-Chlorophenol
10 u
UG/L
Fluorene
10 u
UG/L
2-Methylphenol
10 u
UG/L
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
10 u
UG/L
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
25 U
UG/L
4-Nitroaniline
10 u
UG/L
Acetophenone
25 U
UG/L
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol
10 u
UG/L
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol
10 U
UG/L
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine
10 u
UG/L
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine
NA
UG/L
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
10 u
UG/L
Hexachloroethane
10 U
UG/L
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
10 u
UG/L
Nitrobenzene
10 U
UG/L
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
10 u
UG/L
Isophorone
10 UJ
UG/L
Atrazine
10 u
UG/L
2-Nitrophenol
25 U
UG/L
Pentachlorophenol
3 J
UG/L
2,4-Dimethylphenol
10 U
UG/L
Phenanthrene
10 u
UG/L
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane
10 U
UG/L
Anthracene
10 u
UG/L
2,4-Dichlorophenol
10 UJ
UG/L
Carbazole
10 u
UG/L
Naphthalene
10 U
UG/L
Di-n-Butylphthalate
10 u
UG/L
4-Chloroaniline
6 J
UG/L
Fluoranthene
10 u
UG/L
Hexachlorobutadiene
3 J
UG/L
Pyrene
10 u
UG/L
Caprolactam
10 U
UG/L
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
10 u
UG/L
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
10 UJ
UG/L
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
10 u
UG/L
2-Methylnaphthalene
10 U
UG/L
Benzo(a)Anthracene
10 UJ
UG/L
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)
10 U
UG/L
Chrysene
10 u
UG/L
2,4,6-T richlorophenol
10 U
UG/L
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
25 U
UG/L
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
10 U
UG/L
Di-n-Octylphthalate
10 u
UG/L
1,1 -Biphenyl
10 U
UG/L
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
10 u
UG/L
2-Chloronaphthalene
10 u
UG/L
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
25 U
UG/L
2-Nitroaniline
10 u
UG/L
Benzo-a-Pyrene
10 u
UG/L
Dimethyl Phthalate
10 u
UG/L
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
10 u
UG/L
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
10 u
UG/L
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
10 u
UG/L
Acenaphthylene
10 u
UG/L
Benzo(ghi)Perylene
25 U
UG/L
3-Nitroaniline
3 J
UG/L
Acenaphthene
25 U
UG/L
2,4-Dinitrophenol
25 U
UG/L
4-Nitrophenol
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 18:02
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 09:30
Ending:
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
ULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
3
J
UG/L
TRICHLORPROPENE
7
NJ
UG/L
2 PHENOL-DIMETHYL-
3
J
UG/L
CYCLOPENTAPYRAN
4
NJ
UG/L
PHENOL, 2,4,6-TRIMETHYL-
3
J
UG/L
TRIMETHYLPHENOL
3
NJ
UG/L
PHENOL, 4-ETHYL-3-METHYL-
7
NJ
UG/L
PHENOL, 3-ETHYL-5-METHYL-
3
NJ
UG/L
PHENOL, 3,4,5-TRIMETHYL-
3
NJ
UG/L
PHENOL, 2,3,5-TRIMETHYL-
5
J
UG/L
2 UNKNOWNS
4
J
UG/L
BENZOTHIOPHENE
6
NJ
UG/L
1(2H)-ISOQUINOLINONE
2
J
UG/L
CYCLOPENTAPHENANTHRENE
N
UG/L
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
Sample 163 FY 2006 Project: 06-0040
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: American Creosote Works Inc Louisville, MS
Program: SF Case No: 34743
Id/Station: AC01SW/
Media: SURFACE WATER D No: 3AP6
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 18:02
Sample 164 FY 2006 Project: 06-0040
Extractables Scan
Facility: American Creosote Works Inc
Program: SF
Id/Station: AC01SWS/
Media: SURFACE WATER
Louisville, MS
Case No: 34743
D No: 3AP7
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 09:30
Ending:
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
5ULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
10 UJ
UG/L
Benzaldehyde
10 u
UG/L
Dibenzofuran
10 u
UG/L
Phenol
10 u
UG/L
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
10 u
UG/L
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether
10 u
UG/L
Diethyl Phthalate
10 u
UG/L
2-Chlorophenol
10 u
UG/L
Fluorene
10 u
UG/L
2-Methylphenol
10 u
UG/L
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
10 u
UG/L
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
25 U
UG/L
4-Nitroaniline
10 u
UG/L
Acetophenone
25 U
UG/L
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol
10 u
UG/L
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol
10 U
UG/L
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine
10 u
UG/L
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine
NA
UG/L
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
10 u
UG/L
Hexachloroethane
10 U
UG/L
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
10 u
UG/L
Nitrobenzene
10 U
UG/L
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
10 u
UG/L
Isophorone
10 UJ
UG/L
Atrazine
10 u
UG/L
2-Nitrophenol
25 U
UG/L
Pentachlorophenol
7 J
UG/L
2,4-Dimethylphenol
10 U
UG/L
Phenanthrene
10 u
UG/L
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane
10 U
UG/L
Anthracene
10 u
UG/L
2,4-Dichlorophenol
10 UJ
UG/L
Carbazole
10 u
UG/L
Naphthalene
10 U
UG/L
Di-n-Butylphthalate
10 u
UG/L
4-Chloroaniline
4 J
UG/L
Fluoranthene
10 u
UG/L
Hexachlorobutadiene
2 J
UG/L
Pyrene
10 u
UG/L
Caprolactam
10 U
UG/L
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
10 u
UG/L
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
10 UJ
UG/L
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
10 u
UG/L
2-Methylnaphthalene
10 U
UG/L
Benzo(a)Anthracene
10 UJ
UG/L
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)
10 U
UG/L
Chrysene
10 u
UG/L
2,4,6-T richlorophenol
10 U
UG/L
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
25 U
UG/L
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
10 U
UG/L
Di-n-Octylphthalate
10 u
UG/L
1,1 -Biphenyl
10 U
UG/L
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
10 u
UG/L
2-Chloronaphthalene
10 u
UG/L
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
25 U
UG/L
2-Nitroaniline
10 u
UG/L
Benzo-a-Pyrene
10 u
UG/L
Dimethyl Phthalate
10 u
UG/L
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
10 u
UG/L
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
10 u
UG/L
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
10 u
UG/L
Acenaphthylene
10 u
UG/L
Benzo(ghi)Perylene
25 U
UG/L
3-Nitroaniline
4 J
UG/L
Acenaphthene
25 U
UG/L
2,4-Dinitrophenol
25 U
UG/L
4-Nitrophenol
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 18:02
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 09:30
Ending:
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
4
NJ
UG/L
PHENOL, 2,3,-DIMETHYL-
3
NJ
UG/L
PHENOL, 3,5-DIMETHYL-
16
J
UG/L
5 UNKNOWNS
13
NJ
UG/L
4 PHENOL, 2,4,6-TRIMETHYL-
2
J
UG/L
METHYLETHYLPHENOL
3
J
UG/L
TRIMETHYLPHENOL
4
NJ
UG/L
PHENOL, 4-ETHYL-3-METHYL-
3
NJ
UG/L
6-METHYL-4-INDANOL
15
NJ
UG/L
DIETHYLTOLUAMIDE
6
NJ
UG/L
1(2H)-ISOQUINOLINONE
7
J
UG/L
METHYLHYDROXYLQUINOLINE
N
UG/L
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
8
NJ
UG/L
1,3-CYCLOHEXADIENE, 1-METHYL
Sample 164 FY 2006 Project: 06-0040
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: American Creosote Works Inc Louisville, MS
Program: SF Case No: 34743
Id/Station: AC01SWS/
Media: SURFACE WATER D No: 3AP7
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 18:02
Sample 165 FY 2006 Project: 06-0040
Extractables Scan
Facility: American Creosote Works Inc
Program: SF
Id/Station: AC02SD /
Media: SEDIMENT
Louisville, MS
Case No: 34743
D No: 3AP8
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 11:05
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
1400
U
UG/KG
Benzaldehyde
380
J
UG/KG
Dibenzofuran
1400
U
UG/KG
Phenol
1400
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
1400
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether
1400
U
UG/KG
Diethyl Phthalate
1400
U
UG/KG
2-Chlorophenol
760
J
UG/KG
Fluorene
1400
U
UG/KG
2-Methylphenol
1400
U
UG/KG
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
1400
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
3400
U
UG/KG
4-Nitroaniline
1400
U
UG/KG
Acetophenone
3400
UJ
UG/KG
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol
1400
U
UG/KG
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol
1400
U
UG/KG
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine
1400
U
UG/KG
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine
NA
UG/KG
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
1400
U
UG/KG
Hexachloroethane
1400
U
UG/KG
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
1400
U
UG/KG
Nitrobenzene
1400
U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
1400
U
UG/KG
Isophorone
1400
U
UG/KG
Atrazine
1400
U
UG/KG
2-Nitrophenol
3400
U
UG/KG
Pentachlorophenol
1400
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dimethylphenol
3600
UG/KG
Phenanthrene
1400
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane
3800
UG/KG
Anthracene
1400
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1400
U
UG/KG
Carbazole
380
J
UG/KG
Naphthalene
1400
U
UG/KG
Di-n-Butylphthalate
1400
U
UG/KG
4-Chloroaniline
16000
UG/KG
Fluoranthene
1400
U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobutadiene
16000
UG/KG
Pyrene
1400
U
UG/KG
Caprolactam
1400
U
UG/KG
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
1400
U
UG/KG
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
1400
UJ
UG/KG
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
1400
U
UG/KG
2-Methylnaphthalene
14000
UG/KG
Benzo(a)Anthracene
1400
UJ
UG/KG
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)
17000
UG/KG
Chrysene
1400
u
UG/KG
2,4,6-T richlorophenol
1400
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
3400
u
UG/KG
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
1400
U
UG/KG
Di-n-Octylphthalate
1400
u
UG/KG
1,1 -Biphenyl
15000
UG/KG
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
1400
u
UG/KG
2-Chloronaphthalene
17000
UG/KG
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
3400
u
UG/KG
2-Nitroaniline
16000
UG/KG
Benzo-a-Pyrene
1400
u
UG/KG
Dimethyl Phthalate
11000
J
UG/KG
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
1400
u
UG/KG
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
3600
UG/KG
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
4700
UG/KG
Acenaphthylene
4200
J
UG/KG
Benzo(ghi)Perylene
3400
u
UG/KG
3-Nitroaniline
27
%
% Moisture
560
J
UG/KG
Acenaphthene
3400
UR
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrophenol
3400
UJ
UG/KG
4-Nitrophenol
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 18:02
Sample 165 FY 2006 Project: 06-0040
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: American Creosote Works Inc Louisville, MS
Program: SF Case No: 34743
Id/Station: AC02SD /
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3AP8 Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
1000
NJ
UG/KG
INDENE
46000
J
UG/KG
12 UNKNOWNS
1300
NJ
UG/KG
1H-CYCLOPROPA [L] PHENANTHRENE, 1 A.9B-DIHYDRO-
2400
NJ
UG/KG
4H-CYCLOPROPA [DEF] PHENANTHRENE
1600
J
UG/KG
CYCLOPENTAPHENANTHRENONE
1200
NJ
UG/KG
ACEPHENANTHRYLENE, 4,5-DIHYDRO-
2300
NJ
UG/KG
BENZO [B] NAPHTHO [2,3-D] FURAN
16200
NJ
UG/KG
BENZO [B] FLUORENES 2 ISOMERS
5400
J
UG/KG
BENZOFLUORENE
2700
NJ
UG/KG
PYRENE, 2-METHYL-
2700
J
UG/KG
METHYLPYRENE
4000
NJ
UG/KG
PYRENE, 1-METHYL-
4800
NJ
UG/KG
BENZO [B] NAPHTHO [2,1-D] THIOPHENE
8600
NJ
UG/KG
TRIPHENYLENE, 2-METHYL-
7000
J
UG/KG
BENZOPYRENE
2300
NJ
UG/KG
DINAPHTHO [1,2-B:1',2'-D] FURAN
12000
J
UG/KG
BENZOFLUORANTHENE
3900
NJ
UG/KG
UNKNOWN PAH
3900
J
UG/KG
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 11:05
Ending:
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 18:02
Sample 166 FY 2006 Project: 06-0040 Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
_ , ... „ Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Extractab es Scan
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Facility: American Creosote Works Inc Louisville, MS Beginning'10/13/2005 10 50
Program: SF Case No: 34743 Ending:
Id/Station: AC02SW/
Media: SURFACE WATER D No: 3AP9 Org Contractor: LIBRTY
5ULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
10 UJ
UG/L
Benzaldehyde
10 u
UG/L
Dibenzofuran
10 u
UG/L
Phenol
10 u
UG/L
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
10 u
UG/L
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether
10 u
UG/L
Diethyl Phthalate
10 u
UG/L
2-Chlorophenol
10 u
UG/L
Fluorene
10 u
UG/L
2-Methylphenol
10 u
UG/L
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
10 u
UG/L
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
25 U
UG/L
4-Nitroaniline
10 u
UG/L
Acetophenone
25 U
UG/L
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol
10 u
UG/L
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol
10 U
UG/L
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine
10 u
UG/L
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine
NA
UG/L
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
10 u
UG/L
Hexachloroethane
10 U
UG/L
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
10 u
UG/L
Nitrobenzene
10 U
UG/L
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
10 u
UG/L
Isophorone
10 UJ
UG/L
Atrazine
10 u
UG/L
2-Nitrophenol
25 U
UG/L
Pentachlorophenol
10 u
UG/L
2,4-Dimethylphenol
10 U
UG/L
Phenanthrene
10 u
UG/L
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane
10 U
UG/L
Anthracene
10 u
UG/L
2,4-Dichlorophenol
10 UJ
UG/L
Carbazole
10 u
UG/L
Naphthalene
10 U
UG/L
Di-n-Butylphthalate
10 u
UG/L
4-Chloroaniline
3 J
UG/L
Fluoranthene
10 u
UG/L
Hexachlorobutadiene
10 U
UG/L
Pyrene
10 u
UG/L
Caprolactam
10 U
UG/L
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
10 u
UG/L
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
10 UJ
UG/L
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
10 u
UG/L
2-Methylnaphthalene
10 U
UG/L
Benzo(a)Anthracene
10 UJ
UG/L
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)
3 J
UG/L
Chrysene
10 u
UG/L
2,4,6-T richlorophenol
10 U
UG/L
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
25 U
UG/L
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
10 U
UG/L
Di-n-Octylphthalate
10 u
UG/L
1,1 -Biphenyl
10 U
UG/L
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
10 u
UG/L
2-Chloronaphthalene
10 U
UG/L
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
25 U
UG/L
2-Nitroaniline
10 u
UG/L
Benzo-a-Pyrene
10 u
UG/L
Dimethyl Phthalate
10 u
UG/L
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
10 u
UG/L
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
10 u
UG/L
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
10 u
UG/L
Acenaphthylene
10 u
UG/L
Benzo(ghi)Perylene
25 U
UG/L
3-Nitroaniline
10 u
UG/L
Acenaphthene
25 U
UG/L
2,4-Dinitrophenol
25 U
UG/L
4-Nitrophenol
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 18:02
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Arnett, Michael
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 10:50
Ending:
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
4
J
UG/L
UNKNOWN
24
J
UG/L
TRICHLOROPROPENE
3
NJ
UG/L
CYCLOPENTA(DEF) PHENANTHRENONE
N
UG/L
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
Sample 166 FY 2006 Project: 06-0040
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: American Creosote Works Inc Louisville, MS
Program: SF Case No: 34743
Id/Station: AC02SW/
Media: SURFACE WATER D No: 3AP9
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/28/2005 09:40
Sample 168 FY 2006
SPECIFIED TESTS
Facility: Sonford Products
Program: SF
Id/Station: SP99SW/
Media: SURFACE WATER
Project: 06-0046
Flowood, MS
Case No: 34739
MD No: 3B02
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor: Webster, Donna
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 14:01
Ending:
RESULTS
10 u
10 u
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Arsenic
Lead
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/28/2005 09:40
Sample 169 FY 2006 Project: 06-0046
SPECIFIED TESTS
Facility: Sonford Products
Program: SF
Id/Station: QCPB01 /
Media: PRESERVATIVE BLANK
Flowood, MS
Case No: 34739
MD No: 3B03
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor: Webster, Donna
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 15:20
Ending:
RESULTS
10 u
10 u
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Arsenic
Lead
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/28/2005 09:40
Sample 170 FY 2006 Project: 06-0046
SPECIFIED TESTS
Facility: Sonford Products Flowood, MS
Program: SF Case No: 34739
Id/Station: SP01SD / MD No: 3B04 Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3B04 Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
1.4 J MG/KG Arsenic
20 MG/KG Lead
35 % % Moisture
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor: Webster, Donna
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 14:40
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/28/2005 09:40
Sample 171 FY 2006
SPECIFIED TESTS
Facility: Sonford Products
Program: SF
Id/Station: SP01SW/
Media: SURFACE WATER
Project: 06-0046
Flowood, MS
Case No: 34739
MD No: 3B05
D No: 3B05
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor: Webster, Donna
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 14:30
Ending:
RESULTS
10 u
9.3 J
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Arsenic
Lead
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/28/2005 09:40
Sample 172 FY 2006 Project: 06-0046
SPECIFIED TESTS
Facility: Sonford Products Flowood, MS
Program: SF Case No: 34739
Id/Station: SP02SD / MD No: 3B06 Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3B06 Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
4.1 MG/KG Arsenic
150 MG/KG Lead
68 % % Moisture
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor: Webster, Donna
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 15:05
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/28/2005 09:40
Sample 173 FY 2006 Project: 06-0046
SPECIFIED TESTS
Facility: Sonford Products Flowood, MS
Program: SF Case No: 34739
Id/Station: SP03SD / MD No: 3B07 Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3B07 Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
2.9
MG/KG
Arsenic
62
MG/KG
Lead
30
%
% Moisture
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor: Webster, Donna
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 15:15
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 18:13
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
2.5
U
UG/KG
alpha-BHC
1.6
NJ
UG/KG
beta-BHC
1.2
NJ
UG/KG
delta-BHC
2.5
U
UG/KG
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
2.5
U
UG/KG
Heptachlor
2.5
U
UG/KG
Aldrin
2.5
U
UG/KG
Heptachlor Epoxide
2.5
U
UG/KG
Endosulfan I (alpha)
1.3
J
UG/KG
Dieldrin
4.9
U
UG/KG
4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE)
4.9
U
UG/KG
Endrin
4.9
U
UG/KG
Endosulfan II (beta)
4.9
U
UG/KG
4,4'-DDD (p,p'-DDD)
4.9
U
UG/KG
Endosulfan Sulfate
4.9
U
UG/KG
4,4'-DDT (p, p'-DDT)
25
U
UG/KG
Methoxychlor
4.9
U
UG/KG
Endrin Ketone
4.9
U
UG/KG
Endrin Aldehyde
2.5
U
UG/KG
alpha-Chlordane /2
2.5
U
UG/KG
gamma-Chlordane /2
250
U
UG/KG
Toxaphene
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1016 (Aroclor 1016)
99
U
UG/KG
PCB-1221 (Aroclor 1221)
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1232 (Aroclor 1232)
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1242 (Aroclor 1242)
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1248 (Aroclor 1248)
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1254 (Aroclor 1254)
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1260 (Aroclor 1260)
32
%
% Moisture
Sample 170 FY 2006 Project: 06-0046
Pesticides & Aroclors Scan
Facility: Sonford Products Flowood, MS
Program: SF Case No: 34739
Id/Station: SP01SD / MD No: 3B04
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3B04
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Webster, Donna
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 14:40
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
C-confirmed by GCMS | /1-when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents | /2-constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane rage 1 OT 1
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 18:13
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Webster, Donna
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 14:30
Ending:
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
0.050
U
UG/L
alpha-BHC
0.050
U
UG/L
beta-BHC
0.050
U
UG/L
delta-BHC
0.050
U
UG/L
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
0.050
U
UG/L
Heptachlor
0.050
U
UG/L
Aldrin
0.050
U
UG/L
Heptachlor Epoxide
0.050
u
UG/L
Endosulfan I (alpha)
0.10
u
UG/L
Dieldrin
0.10
u
UG/L
4,4'-DDE (p.p'-DDE)
0.10
u
UG/L
Endrin
0.10
u
UG/L
Endosulfan II (beta)
0.10
u
UG/L
4,4'-DDD (p.p'-DDD)
0.10
u
UG/L
Endosulfan Sulfate
0.10
u
UG/L
4,4'-DDT (p.p'-DDT)
0.50
u
UG/L
Methoxychlor
0.10
u
UG/L
Endrin Ketone
0.10
u
UG/L
Endrin Aldehyde
0.050
u
UG/L
alpha-Chlordane 12
0.050
u
UG/L
gamma-Chlordane 12
5.0
u
UG/L
Toxaphene
1.0
u
UG/L
PCB-1016 (Aroclor 1016)
2.0
u
UG/L
PCB-1221 (Aroclor 1221)
1.0
u
UG/L
PCB-1232 (Aroclor 1232)
1.0
u
UG/L
PCB-1242 (Aroclor 1242)
1.0
u
UG/L
PCB-1248 (Aroclor 1248)
1.0
u
UG/L
PCB-1254 (Aroclor 1254)
1.0
u
UG/L
PCB-1260 (Aroclor 1260)
Sample 171 FY 2006 Project: 06-0046
Pesticides & Aroclors Scan
Facility: Sonford Products Flowood, MS
Program: SF Case No: 34739
Id/Station: SP01SW / MD No: 3B05
Media: SURFACE WATER D No: 3B05
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
C-confirmed by GCMS | /1-when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents | /2-constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane rage 1 OT 1
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 18:13
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
5.3
U
UG/KG
alpha-BHC
9.8
UG/KG
beta-BHC
11
UG/KG
delta-BHC
3.0
NJ
UG/KG
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
5.3
U
UG/KG
Heptachlor
5.3
U
UG/KG
Aldrin
5.3
U
UG/KG
Heptachlor Epoxide
5.3
U
UG/KG
Endosulfan I (alpha)
18
UG/KG
Dieldrin
10
J
UG/KG
4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE)
10
U
UG/KG
Endrin
10
U
UG/KG
Endosulfan II (beta)
10
U
UG/KG
4,4'-DDD (p,p'-DDD)
10
U
UG/KG
Endosulfan Sulfate
10
U
UG/KG
4,4'-DDT (p, p'-DDT)
53
U
UG/KG
Methoxychlor
10
U
UG/KG
Endrin Ketone
10
U
UG/KG
Endrin Aldehyde
2.4
J
UG/KG
alpha-Chlordane /2
5.3
U
UG/KG
gamma-Chlordane /2
530
U
UG/KG
Toxaphene
100
U
UG/KG
PCB-1016 (Aroclor 1016)
210
U
UG/KG
PCB-1221 (Aroclor 1221)
100
U
UG/KG
PCB-1232 (Aroclor 1232)
100
u
UG/KG
PCB-1242 (Aroclor 1242)
100
u
UG/KG
PCB-1248 (Aroclor 1248)
100
u
UG/KG
PCB-1254 (Aroclor 1254)
100
u
UG/KG
PCB-1260 (Aroclor 1260)
68
%
% Moisture
Sample 172 FY 2006 Project: 06-0046
Pesticides & Aroclors Scan
Facility: Sonford Products Flowood, MS
Program: SF Case No: 34739
Id/Station: SP02SD / MD No: 3B06
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3B06
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Webster, Donna
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 15:05
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
C-confirmed by GCMS | /1-when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents | /2-constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane rage 1 OT 1
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 18:13
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
2.5
U
UG/KG
alpha-BHC
2.5
U
UG/KG
beta-BHC
2.5
U
UG/KG
delta-BHC
2.5
U
UG/KG
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
2.5
U
UG/KG
Heptachlor
2.5
U
UG/KG
Aldrin
2.5
U
UG/KG
Heptachlor Epoxide
2.5
U
UG/KG
Endosulfan I (alpha)
2.2
J
UG/KG
Dieldrin
1.2
NJ
UG/KG
4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE)
4.9
U
UG/KG
Endrin
4.9
U
UG/KG
Endosulfan II (beta)
4.9
U
UG/KG
4,4'-DDD (p,p'-DDD)
4.9
U
UG/KG
Endosulfan Sulfate
4.9
U
UG/KG
4,4'-DDT (p, p'-DDT)
25
U
UG/KG
Methoxychlor
4.9
U
UG/KG
Endrin Ketone
4.9
U
UG/KG
Endrin Aldehyde
2.5
U
UG/KG
alpha-Chlordane /2
2.5
U
UG/KG
gamma-Chlordane /2
250
U
UG/KG
Toxaphene
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1016 (Aroclor 1016)
99
U
UG/KG
PCB-1221 (Aroclor 1221)
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1232 (Aroclor 1232)
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1242 (Aroclor 1242)
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1248 (Aroclor 1248)
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1254 (Aroclor 1254)
49
U
UG/KG
PCB-1260 (Aroclor 1260)
32
%
% Moisture
Sample 173 FY 2006 Project: 06-0046
Pesticides & Aroclors Scan
Facility: Sonford Products Flowood, MS
Program: SF Case No: 34739
Id/Station: SP03SD / MD No: 3B07
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3B07
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Webster, Donna
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 15:15
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
C-confirmed by GCMS | /1-when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents | /2-constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane rage 1 OT 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 18:13
Sample 170 FY 2006
Extractables Scan
Facility: Sonford Products
Program: SF
Id/Station: SP01SD /
Media: SEDIMENT
Project: 06-0046
Flowood, MS
Case No: 34739
MD No: 3B04
D No: 3B04
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Webster, Donna
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 14:40
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
490
U
UG/KG
Benzaldehyde
490
U
UG/KG
Dibenzofuran
490
U
UG/KG
Phenol
490
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
490
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether
490
U
UG/KG
Diethyl Phthalate
490
U
UG/KG
2-Chlorophenol
490
U
UG/KG
Fluorene
490
U
UG/KG
2-Methylphenol
490
U
UG/KG
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
490
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
1200
U
UG/KG
4-Nitroaniline
490
U
UG/KG
Acetophenone
1200
UJ
UG/KG
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol
490
U
UG/KG
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol
490
U
UG/KG
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine
490
U
UG/KG
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine
NA
UG/KG
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
490
U
UG/KG
Hexachloroethane
490
U
UG/KG
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
490
U
UG/KG
Nitrobenzene
490
U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
490
U
UG/KG
Isophorone
490
U
UG/KG
Atrazine
490
U
UG/KG
2-Nitrophenol
1200
U
UG/KG
Pentachlorophenol
490
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dimethylphenol
490
U
UG/KG
Phenanthrene
490
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane
490
U
UG/KG
Anthracene
490
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dichlorophenol
490
U
UG/KG
Carbazole
490
U
UG/KG
Naphthalene
490
U
UG/KG
Di-n-Butylphthalate
490
U
UG/KG
4-Chloroaniline
490
U
UG/KG
Fluoranthene
490
U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobutadiene
490
U
UG/KG
Pyrene
490
U
UG/KG
Caprolactam
490
U
UG/KG
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
490
u
UG/KG
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
490
UJ
UG/KG
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
490
u
UG/KG
2-Methylnaphthalene
490
U
UG/KG
Benzo(a)Anthracene
490
u
UG/KG
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)
490
U
UG/KG
Chrysene
490
u
UG/KG
2,4,6-T richlorophenol
490
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
1200
u
UG/KG
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
490
U
UG/KG
Di-n-Octylphthalate
490
u
UG/KG
1,1 -Biphenyl
490
U
UG/KG
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
490
u
UG/KG
2-Chloronaphthalene
490
U
UG/KG
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
1200
u
UG/KG
2-Nitroaniline
490
U
UG/KG
Benzo-a-Pyrene
490
u
UG/KG
Dimethyl Phthalate
490
u
UG/KG
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
490
u
UG/KG
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
490
u
UG/KG
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
490
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthylene
490
u
UG/KG
Benzo(ghi)Perylene
1200
u
UG/KG
3-Nitroaniline
32
%
% Moisture
490
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthene
1200
UR
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrophenol
1200
u
UG/KG
4-Nitrophenol
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 18:13
Sample 170 FY 2006 Project: 06-0046
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Sonford Products
Program: SF
Id/Station: SP01SD /
Media: SEDIMENT
Flowood, MS
Case No: 34739
MD No: 3B04
D No: 3B04
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Webster, Donna
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 14:40
Ending:
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
350 NJ
UG/KG
HEPTAFLUOROBUTYRIC ACID, N-PENTADECYL ESTER-
34000 J
UG/KG
27 UNKNOWNS
1300 NJ
UG/KG
.GAMMA.-SITOSTEROL
N
UG/KG
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 18:13
Sample 171 FY 2006 Project: 06-0046
Extractables Scan
Facility: Sonford Products Flowood, MS
Program: SF Case No: 34739
Id/Station: SP01SW / MD No: 3B05
Media: SURFACE WATER D No: 3B05
5ULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
10 UJ
UG/L
Benzaldehyde
10
U
UG/L
Dibenzofuran
10 u
UG/L
Phenol
10
u
UG/L
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
10 u
UG/L
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether
10
u
UG/L
Diethyl Phthalate
10 u
UG/L
2-Chlorophenol
10
u
UG/L
Fluorene
10 u
UG/L
2-Methylphenol
10
u
UG/L
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
10 u
UG/L
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
25
u
UG/L
4-Nitroaniline
10 u
UG/L
Acetophenone
25
u
UG/L
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol
10 u
UG/L
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol
10
u
UG/L
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine
10 u
UG/L
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine
NA
UG/L
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
10 u
UG/L
Hexachloroethane
10
U
UG/L
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
10 u
UG/L
Nitrobenzene
10
U
UG/L
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
10 u
UG/L
Isophorone
10
UJ
UG/L
Atrazine
10 u
UG/L
2-Nitrophenol
25
U
UG/L
Pentachlorophenol
10 u
UG/L
2,4-Dimethylphenol
10
U
UG/L
Phenanthrene
10 u
UG/L
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane
10
U
UG/L
Anthracene
10 u
UG/L
2,4-Dichlorophenol
10
UJ
UG/L
Carbazole
10 u
UG/L
Naphthalene
10
u
UG/L
Di-n-Butylphthalate
10 u
UG/L
4-Chloroaniline
10
u
UG/L
Fluoranthene
10 u
UG/L
Hexachlorobutadiene
10
u
UG/L
Pyrene
10 u
UG/L
Caprolactam
10
u
UG/L
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
10 u
UG/L
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
10
UJ
UG/L
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
10 u
UG/L
2-Methylnaphthalene
10
u
UG/L
Benzo(a)Anthracene
10 UJ
UG/L
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)
10
u
UG/L
Chrysene
10 u
UG/L
2,4,6-T richlorophenol
10
u
UG/L
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
25 U
UG/L
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
10
u
UG/L
Di-n-Octylphthalate
10 u
UG/L
1,1 -Biphenyl
10
u
UG/L
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
10 u
UG/L
2-Chloronaphthalene
10
u
UG/L
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
25 U
UG/L
2-Nitroaniline
10
u
UG/L
Benzo-a-Pyrene
10 u
UG/L
Dimethyl Phthalate
10
u
UG/L
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
10 u
UG/L
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
10
u
UG/L
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
10 u
UG/L
Acenaphthylene
10
u
UG/L
Benzo(ghi)Perylene
25 U
UG/L
3-Nitroaniline
10 u
UG/L
Acenaphthene
25 U
UG/L
2,4-Dinitrophenol
25 U
UG/L
4-Nitrophenol
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Webster, Donna
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 14:30
Ending:
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 18:13
Sample 171 FY 2006 Project: 06-0046
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Sonford Products
Program: SF
Id/Station: SP01SW/
Media: SURFACE WATER
Flowood, MS
Case No: 34739
MD No: 3B05
D No: 3B05
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Webster, Donna
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 14:30
Ending:
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
8 J UG/L 2 UNKNOWNS
25 NJ UG/L 1-PROPENE.1,1,2-TRICHLORO-
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 18:13
Sample 172 FY 2006
Extractables Scan
Facility: Sonford Products
Program: SF
Id/Station: SP02SD /
Media: SEDIMENT
Project: 06-0046
Flowood, MS
Case No: 34739
MD No: 3B06
D No: 3B06
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Webster, Donna
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 15:05
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
1000
u
UG/KG
Benzaldehyde
1000
U
UG/KG
Dibenzofuran
1000
u
UG/KG
Phenol
1000
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
1000
u
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether
1000
U
UG/KG
Diethyl Phthalate
1000
u
UG/KG
2-Chlorophenol
1000
U
UG/KG
Fluorene
1000
u
UG/KG
2-Methylphenol
1000
U
UG/KG
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
1000
u
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
2600
U
UG/KG
4-Nitroaniline
1000
u
UG/KG
Acetophenone
2600
UJ
UG/KG
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol
1000
u
UG/KG
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol
1000
U
UG/KG
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine
1000
u
UG/KG
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine
NA
UG/KG
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
1000
u
UG/KG
Hexachloroethane
1000
U
UG/KG
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
1000
u
UG/KG
Nitrobenzene
1000
U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
1000
u
UG/KG
Isophorone
1000
U
UG/KG
Atrazine
1000
u
UG/KG
2-Nitrophenol
2600
U
UG/KG
Pentachlorophenol
1000
u
UG/KG
2,4-Dimethylphenol
1000
U
UG/KG
Phenanthrene
1000
u
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane
1000
U
UG/KG
Anthracene
1000
u
UG/KG
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1000
U
UG/KG
Carbazole
1000
u
UG/KG
Naphthalene
1000
U
UG/KG
Di-n-Butylphthalate
1000
u
UG/KG
4-Chloroaniline
350
J
UG/KG
Fluoranthene
1000
u
UG/KG
Hexachlorobutadiene
390
J
UG/KG
Pyrene
1000
u
UG/KG
Caprolactam
1000
U
UG/KG
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
1000
u
UG/KG
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
1000
UJ
UG/KG
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
1000
u
UG/KG
2-Methylnaphthalene
1000
U
UG/KG
Benzo(a)Anthracene
1000
u
UG/KG
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)
310
J
UG/KG
Chrysene
1000
u
UG/KG
2,4,6-T richlorophenol
1000
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
2600
u
UG/KG
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
1000
U
UG/KG
Di-n-Octylphthalate
1000
u
UG/KG
1,1 -Biphenyl
380
J
UG/KG
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
1000
u
UG/KG
2-Chloronaphthalene
330
J
UG/KG
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
2600
u
UG/KG
2-Nitroaniline
240
J
UG/KG
Benzo-a-Pyrene
1000
u
UG/KG
Dimethyl Phthalate
230
J
UG/KG
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
1000
u
UG/KG
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
1000
U
UG/KG
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
1000
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthylene
1000
U
UG/KG
Benzo(ghi)Perylene
2600
u
UG/KG
3-Nitroaniline
68
%
% Moisture
1000
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthene
2600
UR
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2600
u
UG/KG
4-Nitrophenol
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 18:13
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Webster, Donna
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 15:05
Ending:
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
95000
J
UG/KG
23 UNKNOWNS
4800
NJ
UG/KG
CHOLESTEROL
3000
NJ
UG/KG
STIGMASTEROL
17000
NJ
UG/KG
.GAMMA.-SITOSTEROL
6800
NJ
UG/KG
STIGMAST-4-EN-3-ONE
2700
NJ
UG/KG
HOP-22(29)-EN-3.BETA.-OL
95000
NJ
UG/KG
ANDROSTAN-6-ONE, (5.ALPHA. )-
N
UG/KG
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
Sample 172 FY 2006 Project: 06-0046
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Sonford Products Flowood, MS
Program: SF Case No: 34739
Id/Station: SP02SD / MD No: 3B06
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3B06
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 18:13
Sample 173 FY 2006
Extractables Scan
Facility: Sonford Products
Program: SF
Id/Station: SP03SD /
Media: SEDIMENT
Project: 06-0046
Flowood, MS
Case No: 34739
MD No: 3B07
D No: 3B07
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Webster, Donna
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 15:15
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
490
U
UG/KG
Benzaldehyde
490
U
UG/KG
Dibenzofuran
490
U
UG/KG
Phenol
490
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
490
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether
490
U
UG/KG
Diethyl Phthalate
490
U
UG/KG
2-Chlorophenol
490
U
UG/KG
Fluorene
490
U
UG/KG
2-Methylphenol
490
U
UG/KG
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
490
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
1200
U
UG/KG
4-Nitroaniline
490
U
UG/KG
Acetophenone
1200
UJ
UG/KG
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol
490
U
UG/KG
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol
490
U
UG/KG
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine
490
U
UG/KG
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine
NA
UG/KG
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
490
U
UG/KG
Hexachloroethane
490
U
UG/KG
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
490
U
UG/KG
Nitrobenzene
490
U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
490
U
UG/KG
Isophorone
490
U
UG/KG
Atrazine
490
U
UG/KG
2-Nitrophenol
1200
U
UG/KG
Pentachlorophenol
490
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dimethylphenol
490
U
UG/KG
Phenanthrene
490
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane
490
U
UG/KG
Anthracene
490
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dichlorophenol
490
U
UG/KG
Carbazole
490
U
UG/KG
Naphthalene
490
U
UG/KG
Di-n-Butylphthalate
490
U
UG/KG
4-Chloroaniline
490
U
UG/KG
Fluoranthene
490
U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobutadiene
490
U
UG/KG
Pyrene
490
U
UG/KG
Caprolactam
490
U
UG/KG
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
490
u
UG/KG
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
490
UJ
UG/KG
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
490
u
UG/KG
2-Methylnaphthalene
490
U
UG/KG
Benzo(a)Anthracene
490
u
UG/KG
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)
490
U
UG/KG
Chrysene
490
u
UG/KG
2,4,6-T richlorophenol
490
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
1200
u
UG/KG
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
490
U
UG/KG
Di-n-Octylphthalate
490
u
UG/KG
1,1 -Biphenyl
490
U
UG/KG
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
490
u
UG/KG
2-Chloronaphthalene
490
U
UG/KG
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
1200
u
UG/KG
2-Nitroaniline
490
U
UG/KG
Benzo-a-Pyrene
490
u
UG/KG
Dimethyl Phthalate
490
u
UG/KG
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
490
u
UG/KG
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
490
u
UG/KG
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
490
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthylene
490
u
UG/KG
Benzo(ghi)Perylene
1200
u
UG/KG
3-Nitroaniline
32
%
% Moisture
490
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthene
1200
UR
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrophenol
1200
u
UG/KG
4-Nitrophenol
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 18:13
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Webster, Donna
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 15:15
Ending:
Inorg Contractor: BONNER
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
150 NJ
UG/KG
BENZALDEHYDE 3-HYDROXY-4-METHOXY-
5600 J
UG/KG
15 UNKNOWNS
450 NJ
UG/KG
1-EICOSANOL
360 NJ
UG/KG
1,2-TETRADECANEDIOL
2300 NJ
UG/KG
.GAMMA.-SITOSTEROL
2200 NJ
UG/KG
STIGMAST-4-EN-3-ONE
N
UG/KG
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
Sample 173 FY 2006 Project: 06-0046
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Sonford Products Flowood, MS
Program: SF Case No: 34739
Id/Station: SP03SD / MD No: 3B07
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3B07
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
DIOXINS SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/31/2005 12:30
Sample 196 FY 2006 Project: 06-0050
Dioxin Scan
Facility: Sonford Products Flowood, MS
Program: SF
Id/Station: SP01SD /
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 01SD
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
9.0
NG/KG
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin
120
J
NG/KG
Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
100
NG/KG
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzodioxin
750
J
NG/KG
Pentachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
330
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
1000
NG/KG
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
650
NG/KG
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
6700
J
NG/KG
Hexachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
15000
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzodioxin
26000
J
NG/KG
Heptachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
220000
J
NG/KG
Octachlorodibenzodioxin
8.0
NG/KG
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzofuran
200
J
NG/KG
Tetrachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
39
NG/KG
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
74
NG/KG
2,3,4,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
1500
J
NG/KG
Pentachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
290
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
220
NG/KG
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
100
NG/KG
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
340
NG/KG
2,3,4,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
6900
J
NG/KG
Hexachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
3400
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzofuran
380
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-Heptachlorodibenzofuran
9300
J
NG/KG
Heptachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
6200
J
NG/KG
Octachlorodibenzofuran
650
NG/KG
TEQ (Mammalian Toxic. Equiv. Value, From WHO TEQ-98)
460
NG/KG
TEQ (Avian Toxic. Equiv. Value, From WHO TEQ-98)
500
NG/KG
TEQ (Fish Toxic. Equiv. Value, From WHO TEQ-98)
34
%
% Moisture
SAS Number:DIOX
Org Contractor: PARADI
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Webster, Donna
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 14:40
Ending:
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
DIOXINS SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/31/2005 12:30
Sample 197 FY 2006 Project: 06-0050
Dioxin Scan
Facility: Sonford Products Flowood, MS
Program: SF
Id/Station: SP02SD /
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 02SD
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
120
NG/KG
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin
2500
J
NG/KG
Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
950
NG/KG
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzodioxin
9500
J
NG/KG
Pentachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
3400
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
11000
NG/KG
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
6300
NG/KG
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
67000
J
NG/KG
Hexachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
110000
J
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzodioxin
170000
J
NG/KG
Heptachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
220000
J
NG/KG
Octachlorodibenzodioxin
74
NG/KG
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzofuran
3500
J
NG/KG
Tetrachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
420
NG/KG
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
770
NG/KG
2,3,4,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
18000
J
NG/KG
Pentachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
3100
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
2200
NG/KG
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
810
NG/KG
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
3800
NG/KG
2,3,4,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
73000
J
NG/KG
Hexachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
32000
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzofuran
3800
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-Heptachlorodibenzofuran
99000
J
NG/KG
Heptachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
37000
J
NG/KG
Octachlorodibenzofuran
6000
J
NG/KG
TEQ (Mammalian Toxic. Equiv. Value, From WHO TEQ-98)
4400
J
NG/KG
TEQ (Avian Toxic. Equiv. Value, From WHO TEQ-98)
4800
J
NG/KG
TEQ (Fish Toxic. Equiv. Value, From WHO TEQ-98)
66
%
% Moisture
SAS Number:DIOX
Org Contractor: PARADI
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Webster, Donna
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 15:05
Ending:
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
DIOXINS SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/31/2005 12:30
Sample 198 FY 2006 Project: 06-0050
Dioxin Scan
Facility: Sonford Products Flowood, MS
Program: SF
Id/Station: SP03SD /
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 03SD
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
29
NG/KG
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin
490
J
NG/KG
Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
380
NG/KG
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzodioxin
3000
J
NG/KG
Pentachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
1000
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
2600
NG/KG
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
1200
NG/KG
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
13000
J
NG/KG
Hexachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
29000
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzodioxin
46000
J
NG/KG
Heptachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
120000
J
NG/KG
Octachlorodibenzodioxin
28
NG/KG
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzofuran
780
J
NG/KG
Tetrachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
170
NG/KG
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
350
NG/KG
2,3,4,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
6600
J
NG/KG
Pentachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
1200
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
860
NG/KG
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
470
NG/KG
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
1500
NG/KG
2,3,4,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
18000
J
NG/KG
Hexachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
8100
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzofuran
1600
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-Heptachlorodibenzofuran
24000
J
NG/KG
Heptachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
11000
NG/KG
Octachlorodibenzofuran
1900
NG/KG
TEQ (Mammalian Toxic. Equiv. Value, From WHO TEQ-98)
1500
NG/KG
TEQ (Avian Toxic. Equiv. Value, From WHO TEQ-98)
1700
NG/KG
TEQ (Fish Toxic. Equiv. Value, From WHO TEQ-98)
32
%
% Moisture
SAS Number:DIOX
Org Contractor: PARADI
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Webster, Donna
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 15:15
Ending:
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/31/2005 12:29
Sample 152 FY 2006 Project: 06-0042
Extractables Scan
Facility: Davis Timber Hattiesburg, MS
Program: SF Case No: 34745
Id/Station: DT01SD/
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3AS2
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
340
U
UG/KG
Benzaldehyde
340
U
UG/KG
Dibenzofuran
340
U
UG/KG
Phenol
340
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
340
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether
340
U
UG/KG
Diethyl Phthalate
340
U
UG/KG
2-Chlorophenol
340
U
UG/KG
Fluorene
340
U
UG/KG
2-Methylphenol
340
U
UG/KG
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
340
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
850
U
UG/KG
4-Nitroaniline
340
U
UG/KG
Acetophenone
850
UJ
UG/KG
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol
340
U
UG/KG
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol
340
U
UG/KG
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine
340
U
UG/KG
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine
NA
UG/KG
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
340
U
UG/KG
Hexachloroethane
340
U
UG/KG
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
340
U
UG/KG
Nitrobenzene
340
U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
340
U
UG/KG
Isophorone
340
U
UG/KG
Atrazine
340
U
UG/KG
2-Nitrophenol
880
UG/KG
Pentachlorophenol
340
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dimethylphenol
340
U
UG/KG
Phenanthrene
340
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane
340
U
UG/KG
Anthracene
340
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dichlorophenol
340
U
UG/KG
Carbazole
340
U
UG/KG
Naphthalene
340
U
UG/KG
Di-n-Butylphthalate
340
U
UG/KG
4-Chloroaniline
80
J
UG/KG
Fluoranthene
340
U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobutadiene
78
J
UG/KG
Pyrene
340
U
UG/KG
Caprolactam
340
U
UG/KG
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
340
U
UG/KG
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
340
UJ
UG/KG
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
340
U
UG/KG
2-Methylnaphthalene
340
U
UG/KG
Benzo(a)Anthracene
340
U
UG/KG
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)
84
J
UG/KG
Chrysene
340
U
UG/KG
2,4,6-T richlorophenol
340
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
850
u
UG/KG
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
340
U
UG/KG
Di-n-Octylphthalate
340
u
UG/KG
1,1 -Biphenyl
340
U
UG/KG
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
340
u
UG/KG
2-Chloronaphthalene
340
U
UG/KG
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
850
u
UG/KG
2-Nitroaniline
340
U
UG/KG
Benzo-a-Pyrene
340
u
UG/KG
Dimethyl Phthalate
340
U
UG/KG
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
340
u
UG/KG
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
340
U
UG/KG
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
340
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthylene
340
U
UG/KG
Benzo(ghi)Perylene
850
u
UG/KG
3-Nitroaniline
2
%
% Moisture
340
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthene
850
UR
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrophenol
850
u
UG/KG
4-Nitrophenol
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: McLaughlin, Amy
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 18:45
Ending:
Org Contractor: LIBRTY DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 10/31/2005 12:29
Sample 152 FY 2006 Project: 06-0042
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Davis Timber Hattiesburg, MS
Program: SF Case No: 34745
Id/Station: DT01SD/
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3AS2 Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
10000 J
UG/KG
26 UNKNOWNS
310 NJ
UG/KG
13-TERTADECEN-1-OL ACETATE
170 NJ
UG/KG
VITAMIN E
2100 NJ
UG/KG
.GAMMA.-SITOSTEROL
1300 NJ
UG/KG
STIGMAST-4-EN-3-ONE
N
UG/KG
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: McLaughlin, Amy
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 18:45
Ending:
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/31/2005 12:29
Sample 153 FY 2006
Extractables Scan
Facility: Davis Timber
Program: SF
Id/Station: DT01SDS/
Media: SEDIMENT
Project: 06-0042
Hattiesburg, MS
Case No: 34745
D No: 3AS3
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: McLaughlin, Amy
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 18:45
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
340
U
UG/KG
Benzaldehyde
340
U
UG/KG
Dibenzofuran
340
U
UG/KG
Phenol
340
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
340
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether
340
U
UG/KG
Diethyl Phthalate
340
U
UG/KG
2-Chlorophenol
340
U
UG/KG
Fluorene
340
U
UG/KG
2-Methylphenol
340
U
UG/KG
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
340
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
860
U
UG/KG
4-Nitroaniline
340
U
UG/KG
Acetophenone
860
UJ
UG/KG
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol
340
U
UG/KG
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol
340
U
UG/KG
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine
340
U
UG/KG
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine
NA
UG/KG
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
340
U
UG/KG
Hexachloroethane
340
U
UG/KG
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
340
U
UG/KG
Nitrobenzene
340
U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
340
U
UG/KG
Isophorone
340
U
UG/KG
Atrazine
340
U
UG/KG
2-Nitrophenol
450
J
UG/KG
Pentachlorophenol
340
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dimethylphenol
340
U
UG/KG
Phenanthrene
340
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane
340
U
UG/KG
Anthracene
340
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dichlorophenol
340
U
UG/KG
Carbazole
340
U
UG/KG
Naphthalene
340
U
UG/KG
Di-n-Butylphthalate
340
U
UG/KG
4-Chloroaniline
340
U
UG/KG
Fluoranthene
340
U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobutadiene
76
J
UG/KG
Pyrene
340
U
UG/KG
Caprolactam
340
U
UG/KG
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
340
U
UG/KG
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
340
UJ
UG/KG
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
340
U
UG/KG
2-Methylnaphthalene
340
U
UG/KG
Benzo(a)Anthracene
340
U
UG/KG
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)
75
J
UG/KG
Chrysene
340
U
UG/KG
2,4,6-T richlorophenol
340
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
860
u
UG/KG
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
340
U
UG/KG
Di-n-Octylphthalate
340
u
UG/KG
1,1 -Biphenyl
340
U
UG/KG
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
340
u
UG/KG
2-Chloronaphthalene
340
U
UG/KG
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
860
u
UG/KG
2-Nitroaniline
340
U
UG/KG
Benzo-a-Pyrene
340
u
UG/KG
Dimethyl Phthalate
340
U
UG/KG
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
340
u
UG/KG
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
340
U
UG/KG
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
340
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthylene
340
U
UG/KG
Benzo(ghi)Perylene
860
u
UG/KG
3-Nitroaniline
3
%
% Moisture
340
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthene
860
UR
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrophenol
860
u
UG/KG
4-Nitrophenol
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/31/2005 12:29
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: McLaughlin, Amy
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 18:45
Ending:
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
7900 J
UG/KG
27 UNKNOWNS
490 NJ
UG/KG
13-TERTADECEN-1-OL ACETATE
1400 NJ
UG/KG
STIGMASTEROL, 22,23-DIHYDRO-
870 NJ
UG/KG
STIGMAST-4-EN-3-ONE
N
UG/KG
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
Sample 153 FY 2006 Project: 06-0042
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Davis Timber Hattiesburg, MS
Program: SF Case No: 34745
Id/Station: DT01SDS/
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3AS3
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/31/2005 12:29
Sample 154 FY 2006 Project: 06-0042
Extractables Scan
Facility: Davis Timber Hattiesburg, MS
Program: SF Case No: 34745
Id/Station: DT02SD /
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3AS4
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
380
U
UG/KG
Benzaldehyde
380
U
UG/KG
Dibenzofuran
380
U
UG/KG
Phenol
380
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
380
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether
380
U
UG/KG
Diethyl Phthalate
380
U
UG/KG
2-Chlorophenol
380
U
UG/KG
Fluorene
380
U
UG/KG
2-Methylphenol
380
U
UG/KG
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
380
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
940
U
UG/KG
4-Nitroaniline
380
U
UG/KG
Acetophenone
940
UJ
UG/KG
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol
380
U
UG/KG
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol
380
U
UG/KG
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine
380
U
UG/KG
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine
NA
UG/KG
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
380
U
UG/KG
Hexachloroethane
380
U
UG/KG
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
380
U
UG/KG
Nitrobenzene
380
U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
380
U
UG/KG
Isophorone
380
U
UG/KG
Atrazine
380
U
UG/KG
2-Nitrophenol
940
U
UG/KG
Pentachlorophenol
380
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dimethylphenol
380
U
UG/KG
Phenanthrene
380
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane
380
U
UG/KG
Anthracene
380
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dichlorophenol
380
U
UG/KG
Carbazole
380
U
UG/KG
Naphthalene
380
U
UG/KG
Di-n-Butylphthalate
380
U
UG/KG
4-Chloroaniline
380
U
UG/KG
Fluoranthene
380
U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobutadiene
380
U
UG/KG
Pyrene
380
U
UG/KG
Caprolactam
380
U
UG/KG
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
380
U
UG/KG
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
380
UJ
UG/KG
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
380
U
UG/KG
2-Methylnaphthalene
380
U
UG/KG
Benzo(a)Anthracene
380
U
UG/KG
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)
380
U
UG/KG
Chrysene
380
U
UG/KG
2,4,6-T richlorophenol
380
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
940
u
UG/KG
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
380
U
UG/KG
Di-n-Octylphthalate
380
u
UG/KG
1,1 -Biphenyl
380
U
UG/KG
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
380
u
UG/KG
2-Chloronaphthalene
380
U
UG/KG
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
940
u
UG/KG
2-Nitroaniline
380
U
UG/KG
Benzo-a-Pyrene
380
u
UG/KG
Dimethyl Phthalate
380
u
UG/KG
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
380
u
UG/KG
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
380
u
UG/KG
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
380
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthylene
380
u
UG/KG
Benzo(ghi)Perylene
940
u
UG/KG
3-Nitroaniline
12
%
% Moisture
380
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthene
940
UR
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrophenol
940
u
UG/KG
4-Nitrophenol
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: McLaughlin, Amy
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 19:05
Ending:
Org Contractor: LIBRTY DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/31/2005 12:29
Sample 154 FY 2006 Project: 06-0042
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Davis Timber Hattiesburg, MS
Program: SF Case No: 34745
Id/Station: DT02SD /
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3AS4
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: McLaughlin, Amy
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 19:05
Ending:
RESULTS UNITS
3900 J UG/KG
N UG/KG
ANALYTE
16 UNKNOWNS
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
DIOXINS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 10/31/2005 17:48
Sample 201 FY 2006
Project: 06-0049
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Dioxin Scan
Requestor: McLaughlin, Amy
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Facility: Davis Timber
Hattiesburg, MS
Beginning: 10/13/2005 18:45
Program: SF
SAS Number:DIOX
Ending:
Id/Station: DT01SD/
Media: SEDIMENT
D No: 01SD
Org Contractor: PARADI
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
2.4
NG/KG
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin
86 J
NG/KG
Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
45
NG/KG
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzodioxin
380 J
NG/KG
Pentachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
140
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
560
NG/KG
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
320
NG/KG
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
3300 J
NG/KG
Hexachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
13000
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzodioxin
21000 J
NG/KG
Heptachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
93000 J
NG/KG
Octachlorodibenzodioxin
3.4
NG/KG
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzofuran
100 J
NG/KG
Tetrachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
16
NG/KG
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
35
NG/KG
2,3,4,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
690 J
NG/KG
Pentachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
93
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
83
NG/KG
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
33
NG/KG
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
150
NG/KG
2,3,4,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
3200 J
NG/KG
Hexachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
2400
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzofuran
210
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-Heptachlorodibenzofuran
7700 J
NG/KG
Heptachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
7700
NG/KG
Octachlorodibenzofuran
370
NG/KG
TEQ (Mammalian Toxic. Equiv. Value, From WHO TEQ-98)
220
NG/KG
TEQ (Avian Toxic. Equiv. Value, From WHO TEQ-98)
230
NG/KG
TEQ (Fish Toxic. Equiv. Value, From WHO TEQ-98)
2.8
%
% Moisture
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
DIOXINS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 10/31/2005 17:48
Sample 202 FY 2006
Project: 06-0049
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Dioxin Scan
Requestor: McLaughlin, Amy
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Facility: Davis Timber
Hattiesburg, MS
Beginning: 10/13/2005 18:45
Program: SF
SAS Number:DIOX
Ending:
Id/Station: DT01SDS/
Media: SEDIMENT
D No: 01SDS
Org Contractor: PARADI
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
3.3
NG/KG
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin
130 J
NG/KG
Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
60
NG/KG
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzodioxin
510 J
NG/KG
Pentachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
190
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
710
NG/KG
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
440
NG/KG
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
4200 J
NG/KG
Hexachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
17000
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzodioxin
27000 J
NG/KG
Heptachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
92000 J
NG/KG
Octachlorodibenzodioxin
4.5
NG/KG
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzofuran
140 J
NG/KG
Tetrachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
19
NG/KG
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
43
NG/KG
2,3,4,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
840 J
NG/KG
Pentachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
120
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
100
NG/KG
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
41
NG/KG
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
190
NG/KG
2,3,4,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
4000 J
NG/KG
Hexachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
3200
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzofuran
270
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-Heptachlorodibenzofuran
11000 J
NG/KG
Heptachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
9200
NG/KG
Octachlorodibenzofuran
480
NG/KG
TEQ (Mammalian Toxic. Equiv. Value, From WHO TEQ-98)
280
NG/KG
TEQ (Avian Toxic. Equiv. Value, From WHO TEQ-98)
300
NG/KG
TEQ (Fish Toxic. Equiv. Value, From WHO TEQ-98)
3.2
%
% Moisture
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
DIOXINS SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 10/31/2005 17:48
Sample 203 FY 2006
Dioxin Scan
Facility: Davis Timber
Program: SF
Project: 06-0049
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: McLaughlin, Amy
Hattiesburg, MS
SAS Number:DIOX
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/13/2005 19:05
Ending:
Id/Station: DT02SD /
Media: SEDIMENT
D No: 02SD Org Contractor: PARADI
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
0.30
J
NG/KG
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin
4.6
J
NG/KG
Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
2.9
NG/KG
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzodioxin
22
J
NG/KG
Pentachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
11
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
50
NG/KG
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
24
NG/KG
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
240
J
NG/KG
Hexachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
1100
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzodioxin
1800
J
NG/KG
Heptachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
8600
J
NG/KG
Octachlorodibenzodioxin
0.34
U
NG/KG
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzofuran
5.7
J
NG/KG
Tetrachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
1.2
J
NG/KG
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
3.2
NG/KG
2,3,4,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
45
J
NG/KG
Pentachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
7.6
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
5.5
NG/KG
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
2.7
NG/KG
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
10
NG/KG
2,3,4,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
220
J
NG/KG
Hexachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
190
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzofuran
16
NG/KG
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-Heptachlorodibenzofuran
610
J
NG/KG
Heptachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
630
NG/KG
Octachlorodibenzofuran
30
NG/KG
TEQ (Mammalian Toxic. Equiv. Value, From WHO TEQ-98)
17
NG/KG
TEQ (Avian Toxic. Equiv. Value, From WHO TEQ-98)
18
NG/KG
TEQ (Fish Toxic. Equiv. Value, From WHO TEQ-98)
13
%
% Moisture
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/03/2005 18:54
Sample 105 FY 2006 Project: 06-0041
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Chemfax
Program: SF
Id/Station: CF04SDS /
Media: SEDIMENT
Gulfport, MS
Case No: 34744
D No: 3AQ8
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Farrier, Brian
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/14/2005 09:15
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
10
u
UG/KG
Dichlorodifluoromethane
10
u
UG/KG
Dibromochloromethane
10
u
UG/KG
Chloromethane
10
u
UG/KG
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
10
u
UG/KG
Vinyl Chloride
10
u
UG/KG
Chlorobenzene
10
u
UG/KG
Bromomethane
10
u
UG/KG
Ethyl Benzene
10
u
UG/KG
Chloroethane
10
u
UG/KG
Total Xylenes
10
u
UG/KG
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon11)
10
u
UG/KG
Styrene
10
u
UG/KG
1,1-Dichloroethene (1,1-Dichloroethylene)
10
u
UG/KG
Bromoform
10
u
UG/KG
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
10
u
UG/KG
Isopropylbenzene
11
J
UG/KG
Acetone
10
u
UG/KG
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
10
u
UG/KG
Carbon Disulfide
10
u
UG/KG
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/KG
Methyl Acetate
10
u
UG/KG
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/KG
Methylene Chloride
10
u
UG/KG
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/KG
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
10
u
UG/KG
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
10
u
UG/KG
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
10
u
UG/KG
1,2,4-T richlorobenzene
10
u
UG/KG
1,1-Dichloroethane
NA
UG/KG
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/KG
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
17
%
% Moisture
10
UJ
NA
UG/KG
UG/KG
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
10
u
UG/KG
Chloroform
10
u
UG/KG
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
10
u
UG/KG
Cyclohexane
10
u
UG/KG
Carbon Tetrachloride
10
u
UG/KG
Benzene
10
u
UG/KG
1,2-Dichloroethane
10
u
UG/KG
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
10
u
UG/KG
Methylcyclohexane
10
u
UG/KG
1,2-Dichloropropane
10
u
UG/KG
Bromodichloromethane
10
u
UG/KG
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10
u
UG/KG
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
10
u
UG/KG
Toluene
10
u
UG/KG
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
10
u
UG/KG
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
10
u
UG/KG
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
10
UJ
UG/KG
Methyl Butyl Ketone
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/03/2005 18:54
Sample 105 FY 2006 Project: 06-0041
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Chemfax Gulfport, MS
Program: SF
Id/Station: CF04SDS /
Media: SEDIMENT
Case No: 34744
D No: 3AQ8
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Farrier, Brian
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/14/2005 09:15
Ending:
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
8 J UG/KG UNKNOWN
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/03/2005 18:54
Sample 106 FY 2006 Project: 06-0041
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Chemfax
Program: SF
Id/Station: CF04SD /
Media: SEDIMENT
Gulfport, MS
Case No: 34744
D No: 3AQ9
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Farrier, Brian
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/14/2005 09:15
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
10
u
UG/KG
Dichlorodifluoromethane
10
u
UG/KG
Dibromochloromethane
10
u
UG/KG
Chloromethane
10
u
UG/KG
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
10
u
UG/KG
Vinyl Chloride
10
u
UG/KG
Chlorobenzene
10
u
UG/KG
Bromomethane
10
u
UG/KG
Ethyl Benzene
10
u
UG/KG
Chloroethane
10
u
UG/KG
Total Xylenes
10
u
UG/KG
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon11)
10
u
UG/KG
Styrene
10
u
UG/KG
1,1-Dichloroethene (1,1-Dichloroethylene)
10
u
UG/KG
Bromoform
10
u
UG/KG
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
10
u
UG/KG
Isopropylbenzene
10
J
UG/KG
Acetone
10
u
UG/KG
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
10
u
UG/KG
Carbon Disulfide
10
u
UG/KG
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/KG
Methyl Acetate
10
u
UG/KG
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/KG
Methylene Chloride
10
u
UG/KG
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/KG
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
10
u
UG/KG
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
10
u
UG/KG
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
10
u
UG/KG
1,2,4-T richlorobenzene
10
u
UG/KG
1,1-Dichloroethane
NA
UG/KG
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
10
u
UG/KG
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
17
%
% Moisture
10
UJ
NA
UG/KG
UG/KG
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
10
u
UG/KG
Chloroform
10
u
UG/KG
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
10
u
UG/KG
Cyclohexane
10
u
UG/KG
Carbon Tetrachloride
10
u
UG/KG
Benzene
10
u
UG/KG
1,2-Dichloroethane
10
u
UG/KG
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
10
u
UG/KG
Methylcyclohexane
10
u
UG/KG
1,2-Dichloropropane
10
u
UG/KG
Bromodichloromethane
10
u
UG/KG
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10
u
UG/KG
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
10
u
UG/KG
Toluene
10
u
UG/KG
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
10
u
UG/KG
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
10
u
UG/KG
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
10
UJ
UG/KG
Methyl Butyl Ketone
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/03/2005 18:54
Sample 106 FY 2006 Project: 06-0041
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Chemfax Gulfport, MS
Program: SF
Id/Station: CF04SD /
Media: SEDIMENT
Case No: 34744
D No: 3AQ9
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Farrier, Brian
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/14/2005 09:15
Ending:
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
6 J UG/KG UNKNOWN
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/03/2005 18:54
Sample 107 FY 2006 Project: 06-0041
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Chemfax
Program: SF
Id/Station: CF03SD /
Media: SEDIMENT
Gulfport, MS
Case No: 34744
D No: 3AR0
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Farrier, Brian
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/14/2005 09:30
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
11
U
UG/KG
Dichlorodifluoromethane
11
U
UG/KG
Dibromochloromethane
11
u
UG/KG
Chloromethane
11
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
11
u
UG/KG
Vinyl Chloride
11
U
UG/KG
Chlorobenzene
11
u
UG/KG
Bromomethane
11
U
UG/KG
Ethyl Benzene
11
u
UG/KG
Chloroethane
11
U
UG/KG
Total Xylenes
11
u
UG/KG
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon11)
11
U
UG/KG
Styrene
11
u
UG/KG
1,1-Dichloroethene (1,1-Dichloroethylene)
11
U
UG/KG
Bromoform
11
u
UG/KG
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
11
U
UG/KG
Isopropylbenzene
11
UJ
UG/KG
Acetone
11
U
UG/KG
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
11
u
UG/KG
Carbon Disulfide
11
U
UG/KG
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
11
u
UG/KG
Methyl Acetate
11
U
UG/KG
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
11
u
UG/KG
Methylene Chloride
11
u
UG/KG
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
11
u
UG/KG
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
11
u
UG/KG
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
11
u
UG/KG
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
11
u
UG/KG
1,2,4-T richlorobenzene
11
u
UG/KG
1,1-Dichloroethane
NA
UG/KG
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
11
u
UG/KG
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
17
%
% Moisture
11
UJ
NA
UG/KG
UG/KG
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
11
U
UG/KG
Chloroform
11
U
UG/KG
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
11
U
UG/KG
Cyclohexane
11
u
UG/KG
Carbon Tetrachloride
11
u
UG/KG
Benzene
11
u
UG/KG
1,2-Dichloroethane
11
u
UG/KG
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
11
u
UG/KG
Methylcyclohexane
11
u
UG/KG
1,2-Dichloropropane
11
u
UG/KG
Bromodichloromethane
11
u
UG/KG
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
11
u
UG/KG
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
11
u
UG/KG
Toluene
11
u
UG/KG
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
11
u
UG/KG
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
11
u
UG/KG
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
11
UJ
UG/KG
Methyl Butyl Ketone
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/03/2005 18:54
Sample 107 FY 2006 Project: 06-0041
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Chemfax Gulfport, MS
Program: SF
Id/Station: CF03SD /
Media: SEDIMENT
Case No: 34744
D No: 3AR0
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Farrier, Brian
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/14/2005 09:30
Ending:
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
8 J UG/KG UNKNOWN
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/03/2005 18:54
Sample 108 FY 2006 Project: 06-0041
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Chemfax
Program: SF
Id/Station: CF02SD /
Media: SEDIMENT
Gulfport, MS
Case No: 34744
D No: 3AR1
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Farrier, Brian
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/14/2005 09:45
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
11
U
UG/KG
Dichlorodifluoromethane
11
U
UG/KG
Dibromochloromethane
11
U
UG/KG
Chloromethane
11
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
11
U
UG/KG
Vinyl Chloride
11
U
UG/KG
Chlorobenzene
11
U
UG/KG
Bromomethane
11
U
UG/KG
Ethyl Benzene
11
U
UG/KG
Chloroethane
11
U
UG/KG
Total Xylenes
11
U
UG/KG
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon11)
11
U
UG/KG
Styrene
11
U
UG/KG
1,1-Dichloroethene (1,1-Dichloroethylene)
11
U
UG/KG
Bromoform
11
U
UG/KG
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
11
U
UG/KG
Isopropylbenzene
12
J
UG/KG
Acetone
11
U
UG/KG
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
11
U
UG/KG
Carbon Disulfide
11
U
UG/KG
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
11
U
UG/KG
Methyl Acetate
11
u
UG/KG
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
11
U
UG/KG
Methylene Chloride
11
u
UG/KG
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
11
u
UG/KG
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
11
u
UG/KG
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
11
u
UG/KG
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
11
u
UG/KG
1,2,4-T richlorobenzene
11
u
UG/KG
1,1-Dichloroethane
NA
UG/KG
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
11
u
UG/KG
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
20
%
% Moisture
11
UJ
NA
UG/KG
UG/KG
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
11
U
UG/KG
Chloroform
11
U
UG/KG
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
11
U
UG/KG
Cyclohexane
11
U
UG/KG
Carbon Tetrachloride
11
U
UG/KG
Benzene
11
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dichloroethane
11
U
UG/KG
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
11
U
UG/KG
Methylcyclohexane
11
u
UG/KG
1,2-Dichloropropane
11
u
UG/KG
Bromodichloromethane
11
u
UG/KG
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
11
u
UG/KG
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
11
u
UG/KG
Toluene
11
u
UG/KG
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
11
u
UG/KG
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
11
u
UG/KG
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
11
UJ
UG/KG
Methyl Butyl Ketone
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/03/2005 18:54
Sample 108 FY 2006 Project: 06-0041
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Chemfax Gulfport, MS
Program: SF
Id/Station: CF02SD /
Media: SEDIMENT
Case No: 34744
D No: 3AR1
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Farrier, Brian
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/14/2005 09:45
Ending:
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
6 J UG/KG UNKNOWN
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/03/2005 18:54
Sample 109 FY 2006 Project: 06-0041
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Chemfax
Program: SF
Id/Station: CF01SD /
Media: SEDIMENT
Gulfport, MS
Case No: 34744
D No: 3AR2
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Farrier, Brian
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/14/2005 10:20
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
12
U
UG/KG
Dichlorodifluoromethane
12
U
UG/KG
Dibromochloromethane
12
U
UG/KG
Chloromethane
12
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
12
U
UG/KG
Vinyl Chloride
12
U
UG/KG
Chlorobenzene
12
U
UG/KG
Bromomethane
12
U
UG/KG
Ethyl Benzene
12
U
UG/KG
Chloroethane
12
U
UG/KG
Total Xylenes
12
U
UG/KG
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon11)
12
U
UG/KG
Styrene
12
U
UG/KG
1,1-Dichloroethene (1,1-Dichloroethylene)
12
U
UG/KG
Bromoform
12
U
UG/KG
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
12
U
UG/KG
Isopropylbenzene
19
J
UG/KG
Acetone
12
U
UG/KG
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
12
U
UG/KG
Carbon Disulfide
12
U
UG/KG
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
12
U
UG/KG
Methyl Acetate
12
U
UG/KG
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
12
U
UG/KG
Methylene Chloride
12
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
12
U
UG/KG
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
12
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
12
U
UG/KG
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
12
U
UG/KG
1,2,4-T richlorobenzene
12
U
UG/KG
1,1-Dichloroethane
NA
UG/KG
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
12
U
UG/KG
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
18
%
% Moisture
12
UJ
NA
UG/KG
UG/KG
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
12
U
UG/KG
Chloroform
12
U
UG/KG
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
12
U
UG/KG
Cyclohexane
12
U
UG/KG
Carbon Tetrachloride
12
U
UG/KG
Benzene
12
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dichloroethane
12
U
UG/KG
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
12
U
UG/KG
Methylcyclohexane
12
U
UG/KG
1,2-Dichloropropane
12
U
UG/KG
Bromodichloromethane
12
U
UG/KG
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
12
U
UG/KG
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
12
U
UG/KG
Toluene
12
U
UG/KG
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
12
U
UG/KG
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
12
U
UG/KG
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
12
UJ
UG/KG
Methyl Butyl Ketone
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/03/2005 18:54
Sample 109 FY 2006 Project: 06-0041
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Chemfax Gulfport, MS
Program: SF
Id/Station: CF01SD /
Media: SEDIMENT
Case No: 34744
D No: 3AR2
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Farrier, Brian
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/14/2005 10:20
Ending:
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
6 J UG/KG UNKNOWN
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/03/2005 18:54
Sample 105 FY 2006
Extractables Scan
Facility: Chemfax
Program: SF
Id/Station: CF04SDS /
Media: SEDIMENT
Project: 06-0041
Gulfport, MS
Case No: 34744
D No: 3AQ8
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Farrier, Brian
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/14/2005 09:15
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
400
U
UG/KG
Benzaldehyde
400
U
UG/KG
Dibenzofuran
400
U
UG/KG
Phenol
400
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
400
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether
400
U
UG/KG
Diethyl Phthalate
400
U
UG/KG
2-Chlorophenol
400
U
UG/KG
Fluorene
400
U
UG/KG
2-Methylphenol
400
U
UG/KG
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
400
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
1000
U
UG/KG
4-Nitroaniline
400
U
UG/KG
Acetophenone
1000
UJ
UG/KG
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol
400
u
UG/KG
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol
400
U
UG/KG
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine
400
u
UG/KG
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine
NA
UG/KG
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
400
u
UG/KG
Hexachloroethane
400
U
UG/KG
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
400
u
UG/KG
Nitrobenzene
400
U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
400
u
UG/KG
Isophorone
400
U
UG/KG
Atrazine
400
u
UG/KG
2-Nitrophenol
1000
U
UG/KG
Pentachlorophenol
400
u
UG/KG
2,4-Dimethylphenol
400
U
UG/KG
Phenanthrene
400
u
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane
400
UJ
UG/KG
Anthracene
400
u
UG/KG
2,4-Dichlorophenol
400
U
UG/KG
Carbazole
400
u
UG/KG
Naphthalene
400
U
UG/KG
Di-n-Butylphthalate
400
u
UG/KG
4-Chloroaniline
400
UJ
UG/KG
Fluoranthene
400
u
UG/KG
Hexachlorobutadiene
400
U
UG/KG
Pyrene
400
u
UG/KG
Caprolactam
400
U
UG/KG
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
400
u
UG/KG
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
400
UJ
UG/KG
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
400
u
UG/KG
2-Methylnaphthalene
400
U
UG/KG
Benzo(a)Anthracene
400
UJ
UG/KG
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)
400
U
UG/KG
Chrysene
400
u
UG/KG
2,4,6-T richlorophenol
400
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
1000
u
UG/KG
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
400
U
UG/KG
Di-n-Octylphthalate
400
u
UG/KG
1,1 -Biphenyl
400
u
UG/KG
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
400
u
UG/KG
2-Chloronaphthalene
400
u
UG/KG
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
1000
u
UG/KG
2-Nitroaniline
400
u
UG/KG
Benzo-a-Pyrene
400
u
UG/KG
Dimethyl Phthalate
400
UJ
UG/KG
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
400
u
UG/KG
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
400
UJ
UG/KG
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
400
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthylene
400
UJ
UG/KG
Benzo(ghi)Perylene
1000
u
UG/KG
3-Nitroaniline
17
%
% Moisture
400
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthene
1000
UR
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrophenol
1000
UJ
UG/KG
4-Nitrophenol
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/03/2005 18:54
Sample 105 FY 2006 Project: 06-0041
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Chemfax Gulfport, MS
Program: SF
Id/Station: CF04SDS /
Media: SEDIMENT
Case No: 34744
D No: 3AQ8
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Farrier, Brian
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/14/2005 09:15
Ending:
RESULTS UNITS
2400 J UG/KG
N UG/KG
ANALYTE
10 UNKNOWNS
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/03/2005 18:54
Sample 106 FY 2006
Extractables Scan
Facility: Chemfax
Program: SF
Id/Station: CF04SD /
Media: SEDIMENT
Project: 06-0041
Gulfport, MS
Case No: 34744
D No: 3AQ9
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Farrier, Brian
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/14/2005 09:15
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
400
U
UG/KG
Benzaldehyde
400
U
UG/KG
Dibenzofuran
400
U
UG/KG
Phenol
400
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
400
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether
400
U
UG/KG
Diethyl Phthalate
400
U
UG/KG
2-Chlorophenol
400
U
UG/KG
Fluorene
400
U
UG/KG
2-Methylphenol
400
U
UG/KG
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
400
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
1000
U
UG/KG
4-Nitroaniline
96
J
UG/KG
Acetophenone
1000
U
UG/KG
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol
400
U
UG/KG
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol
400
U
UG/KG
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine
400
u
UG/KG
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine
NA
UG/KG
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
400
u
UG/KG
Hexachloroethane
400
U
UG/KG
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
400
u
UG/KG
Nitrobenzene
400
U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
400
u
UG/KG
Isophorone
400
U
UG/KG
Atrazine
400
u
UG/KG
2-Nitrophenol
1000
U
UG/KG
Pentachlorophenol
400
u
UG/KG
2,4-Dimethylphenol
400
U
UG/KG
Phenanthrene
400
u
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane
400
UJ
UG/KG
Anthracene
400
u
UG/KG
2,4-Dichlorophenol
400
UJ
UG/KG
Carbazole
400
u
UG/KG
Naphthalene
400
U
UG/KG
Di-n-Butylphthalate
400
u
UG/KG
4-Chloroaniline
400
UJ
UG/KG
Fluoranthene
400
u
UG/KG
Hexachlorobutadiene
400
U
UG/KG
Pyrene
400
u
UG/KG
Caprolactam
400
U
UG/KG
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
400
u
UG/KG
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
400
UJ
UG/KG
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
400
u
UG/KG
2-Methylnaphthalene
400
U
UG/KG
Benzo(a)Anthracene
400
u
UG/KG
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)
400
U
UG/KG
Chrysene
400
u
UG/KG
2,4,6-T richlorophenol
400
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
1000
u
UG/KG
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
400
U
UG/KG
Di-n-Octylphthalate
400
u
UG/KG
1,1 -Biphenyl
400
u
UG/KG
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
400
u
UG/KG
2-Chloronaphthalene
400
u
UG/KG
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
1000
u
UG/KG
2-Nitroaniline
400
u
UG/KG
Benzo-a-Pyrene
400
u
UG/KG
Dimethyl Phthalate
400
UJ
UG/KG
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
400
u
UG/KG
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
400
UJ
UG/KG
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
400
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthylene
400
u
UG/KG
Benzo(ghi)Perylene
1000
u
UG/KG
3-Nitroaniline
17
%
% Moisture
400
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthene
1000
UJ
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrophenol
1000
u
UG/KG
4-Nitrophenol
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/03/2005 18:54
Sample 106 FY 2006 Project: 06-0041
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Chemfax Gulfport, MS
Program: SF Case No: 34744
Id/Station: CF04SD /
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3AQ9 Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
4100
J
UG/KG
14 UNKNOWNS
620
NJ
UG/KG
STIGMASTEROL
N
UG/KG
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Farrier, Brian
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/14/2005 09:15
Ending:
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/03/2005 18:54
Sample 107 FY 2006
Extractables Scan
Facility: Chemfax
Program: SF
Id/Station: CF03SD /
Media: SEDIMENT
Project: 06-0041
Gulfport, MS
Case No: 34744
D No: 3AR0
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Farrier, Brian
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/14/2005 09:30
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
400
U
UG/KG
Benzaldehyde
400
U
UG/KG
Dibenzofuran
400
U
UG/KG
Phenol
400
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
400
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether
400
U
UG/KG
Diethyl Phthalate
400
U
UG/KG
2-Chlorophenol
400
U
UG/KG
Fluorene
400
U
UG/KG
2-Methylphenol
400
U
UG/KG
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
400
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
1000
U
UG/KG
4-Nitroaniline
400
U
UG/KG
Acetophenone
1000
UJ
UG/KG
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol
400
u
UG/KG
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol
400
U
UG/KG
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine
400
u
UG/KG
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine
NA
UG/KG
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
400
u
UG/KG
Hexachloroethane
400
U
UG/KG
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
400
u
UG/KG
Nitrobenzene
400
U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
400
u
UG/KG
Isophorone
400
U
UG/KG
Atrazine
400
u
UG/KG
2-Nitrophenol
1000
U
UG/KG
Pentachlorophenol
400
u
UG/KG
2,4-Dimethylphenol
400
U
UG/KG
Phenanthrene
400
u
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane
400
UJ
UG/KG
Anthracene
400
u
UG/KG
2,4-Dichlorophenol
400
U
UG/KG
Carbazole
400
u
UG/KG
Naphthalene
400
U
UG/KG
Di-n-Butylphthalate
400
u
UG/KG
4-Chloroaniline
400
UJ
UG/KG
Fluoranthene
400
u
UG/KG
Hexachlorobutadiene
400
U
UG/KG
Pyrene
400
u
UG/KG
Caprolactam
400
U
UG/KG
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
400
u
UG/KG
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
400
UJ
UG/KG
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
400
u
UG/KG
2-Methylnaphthalene
400
U
UG/KG
Benzo(a)Anthracene
400
UJ
UG/KG
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)
400
U
UG/KG
Chrysene
400
u
UG/KG
2,4,6-T richlorophenol
400
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
1000
u
UG/KG
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
400
U
UG/KG
Di-n-Octylphthalate
400
u
UG/KG
1,1 -Biphenyl
400
u
UG/KG
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
400
u
UG/KG
2-Chloronaphthalene
400
u
UG/KG
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
1000
u
UG/KG
2-Nitroaniline
400
u
UG/KG
Benzo-a-Pyrene
400
u
UG/KG
Dimethyl Phthalate
400
UJ
UG/KG
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
400
u
UG/KG
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
400
UJ
UG/KG
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
400
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthylene
400
UJ
UG/KG
Benzo(ghi)Perylene
1000
u
UG/KG
3-Nitroaniline
17
%
% Moisture
400
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthene
1000
UR
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrophenol
1000
UJ
UG/KG
4-Nitrophenol
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/03/2005 18:54
Sample 107 FY 2006 Project: 06-0041
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Chemfax Gulfport, MS
Program: SF
Id/Station: CF03SD /
Media: SEDIMENT
Case No: 34744
D No: 3AR0
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Farrier, Brian
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/14/2005 09:30
Ending:
RESULTS
320 J
UNITS
UG/KG
ANALYTE
3 UNKNOWNS
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/03/2005 18:54
Sample 108 FY 2006
Extractables Scan
Facility: Chemfax
Program: SF
Id/Station: CF02SD /
Media: SEDIMENT
Project: 06-0041
Gulfport, MS
Case No: 34744
D No: 3AR1
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Farrier, Brian
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/14/2005 09:45
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
410
U
UG/KG
Benzaldehyde
410
U
UG/KG
Dibenzofuran
410
U
UG/KG
Phenol
410
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
410
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether
410
U
UG/KG
Diethyl Phthalate
410
U
UG/KG
2-Chlorophenol
410
U
UG/KG
Fluorene
410
U
UG/KG
2-Methylphenol
410
U
UG/KG
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
410
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
1000
U
UG/KG
4-Nitroaniline
410
U
UG/KG
Acetophenone
1000
UJ
UG/KG
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol
410
U
UG/KG
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol
410
U
UG/KG
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine
410
U
UG/KG
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine
NA
UG/KG
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
410
U
UG/KG
Hexachloroethane
410
U
UG/KG
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
410
U
UG/KG
Nitrobenzene
410
U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
410
u
UG/KG
Isophorone
410
U
UG/KG
Atrazine
410
u
UG/KG
2-Nitrophenol
1000
U
UG/KG
Pentachlorophenol
410
u
UG/KG
2,4-Dimethylphenol
410
U
UG/KG
Phenanthrene
410
u
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane
410
UJ
UG/KG
Anthracene
410
u
UG/KG
2,4-Dichlorophenol
410
U
UG/KG
Carbazole
410
u
UG/KG
Naphthalene
410
U
UG/KG
Di-n-Butylphthalate
410
u
UG/KG
4-Chloroaniline
410
UJ
UG/KG
Fluoranthene
410
u
UG/KG
Hexachlorobutadiene
410
U
UG/KG
Pyrene
410
u
UG/KG
Caprolactam
410
U
UG/KG
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
410
u
UG/KG
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
410
UJ
UG/KG
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
410
u
UG/KG
2-Methylnaphthalene
410
U
UG/KG
Benzo(a)Anthracene
410
UJ
UG/KG
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)
410
U
UG/KG
Chrysene
410
u
UG/KG
2,4,6-T richlorophenol
410
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
1000
u
UG/KG
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
410
U
UG/KG
Di-n-Octylphthalate
410
u
UG/KG
1,1 -Biphenyl
410
U
UG/KG
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
410
u
UG/KG
2-Chloronaphthalene
410
u
UG/KG
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
1000
u
UG/KG
2-Nitroaniline
410
u
UG/KG
Benzo-a-Pyrene
410
u
UG/KG
Dimethyl Phthalate
410
UJ
UG/KG
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
410
u
UG/KG
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
410
UJ
UG/KG
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
410
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthylene
410
UJ
UG/KG
Benzo(ghi)Perylene
1000
u
UG/KG
3-Nitroaniline
20
%
% Moisture
410
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthene
1000
UR
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrophenol
1000
UJ
UG/KG
4-Nitrophenol
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/03/2005 18:54
Sample 108 FY 2006 Project: 06-0041
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Chemfax Gulfport, MS
Program: SF
Id/Station: CF02SD /
Media: SEDIMENT
Case No: 34744
D No: 3AR1
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Farrier, Brian
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/14/2005 09:45
Ending:
RESULTS UNITS
1800 J UG/KG
ANALYTE
8 UNKNOWNS
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/03/2005 18:54
Sample 109 FY 2006
Extractables Scan
Facility: Chemfax
Program: SF
Id/Station: CF01SD /
Media: SEDIMENT
Project: 06-0041
Gulfport, MS
Case No: 34744
D No: 3AR2
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Farrier, Brian
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/14/2005 10:20
Ending:
DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
400
U
UG/KG
Benzaldehyde
400
U
UG/KG
Dibenzofuran
400
U
UG/KG
Phenol
400
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
400
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether
400
U
UG/KG
Diethyl Phthalate
400
U
UG/KG
2-Chlorophenol
400
U
UG/KG
Fluorene
400
U
UG/KG
2-Methylphenol
400
U
UG/KG
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
400
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
1000
U
UG/KG
4-Nitroaniline
400
U
UG/KG
Acetophenone
1000
UJ
UG/KG
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol
400
u
UG/KG
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol
400
U
UG/KG
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine
400
u
UG/KG
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine
NA
UG/KG
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
400
u
UG/KG
Hexachloroethane
400
U
UG/KG
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
400
u
UG/KG
Nitrobenzene
400
U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
400
u
UG/KG
Isophorone
400
U
UG/KG
Atrazine
400
u
UG/KG
2-Nitrophenol
1000
U
UG/KG
Pentachlorophenol
400
u
UG/KG
2,4-Dimethylphenol
400
U
UG/KG
Phenanthrene
400
u
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane
400
UJ
UG/KG
Anthracene
400
u
UG/KG
2,4-Dichlorophenol
400
U
UG/KG
Carbazole
400
u
UG/KG
Naphthalene
400
U
UG/KG
Di-n-Butylphthalate
400
u
UG/KG
4-Chloroaniline
400
UJ
UG/KG
Fluoranthene
400
u
UG/KG
Hexachlorobutadiene
400
U
UG/KG
Pyrene
400
u
UG/KG
Caprolactam
400
U
UG/KG
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
400
u
UG/KG
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
400
UJ
UG/KG
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
400
u
UG/KG
2-Methylnaphthalene
400
U
UG/KG
Benzo(a)Anthracene
400
UJ
UG/KG
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)
400
U
UG/KG
Chrysene
400
u
UG/KG
2,4,6-T richlorophenol
400
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
1000
u
UG/KG
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
400
U
UG/KG
Di-n-Octylphthalate
400
u
UG/KG
1,1 -Biphenyl
400
u
UG/KG
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
400
u
UG/KG
2-Chloronaphthalene
400
u
UG/KG
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
1000
u
UG/KG
2-Nitroaniline
400
u
UG/KG
Benzo-a-Pyrene
400
u
UG/KG
Dimethyl Phthalate
400
UJ
UG/KG
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
400
u
UG/KG
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
400
UJ
UG/KG
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
400
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthylene
400
UJ
UG/KG
Benzo(ghi)Perylene
1000
u
UG/KG
3-Nitroaniline
18
%
% Moisture
400
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthene
1000
UR
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrophenol
1000
UJ
UG/KG
4-Nitrophenol
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/03/2005 18:54
Sample 109 FY 2006 Project: 06-0041
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Chemfax Gulfport, MS
Program: SF
Id/Station: CF01SD /
Media: SEDIMENT
Case No: 34744
D No: 3AR2
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Farrier, Brian
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/14/2005 10:20
Ending:
RESULTS UNITS
2300 J UG/KG
ANALYTE
13 UNKNOWNS
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 17:49
Sample 156 FY 2006 Project: 06-0043
Extractables Scan
Facility: Picayune Wood Treating Picayune, MS
Program: SF Case No: 34746
Id/Station: PW01SD/
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3AT6
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
580
U
UG/KG
Benzaldehyde
580 U
UG/KG
Dibenzofuran
580
U
UG/KG
Phenol
580 U
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
580
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether
580 U
UG/KG
Diethyl Phthalate
580
U
UG/KG
2-Chlorophenol
580 U
UG/KG
Fluorene
580
U
UG/KG
2-Methylphenol
580 U
UG/KG
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
580
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
1500 U
UG/KG
4-Nitroaniline
580
U
UG/KG
Acetophenone
1500 UJ
UG/KG
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol
580
U
UG/KG
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol
580 U
UG/KG
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine
580
U
UG/KG
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine
NA
UG/KG
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
580
U
UG/KG
Hexachloroethane
580 U
UG/KG
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
580
U
UG/KG
Nitrobenzene
580 U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
580
U
UG/KG
Isophorone
580 U
UG/KG
Atrazine
580
U
UG/KG
2-Nitrophenol
1500 U
UG/KG
Pentachlorophenol
580
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dimethylphenol
290 J
UG/KG
Phenanthrene
580
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane
580 U
UG/KG
Anthracene
580
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dichlorophenol
580 U
UG/KG
Carbazole
580
U
UG/KG
Naphthalene
580 U
UG/KG
Di-n-Butylphthalate
580
U
UG/KG
4-Chloroaniline
870
UG/KG
Fluoranthene
580
U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobutadiene
650
UG/KG
Pyrene
580
U
UG/KG
Caprolactam
580 U
UG/KG
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
580
u
UG/KG
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
580 UJ
UG/KG
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
580
u
UG/KG
2-Methylnaphthalene
280 J
UG/KG
Benzo(a)Anthracene
580
UJ
UG/KG
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)
520 J
UG/KG
Chrysene
580
u
UG/KG
2,4,6-T richlorophenol
990
UG/KG
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
1500
u
UG/KG
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
580 U
UG/KG
Di-n-Octylphthalate
580
u
UG/KG
1,1 -Biphenyl
600
UG/KG
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
580
u
UG/KG
2-Chloronaphthalene
410 J
UG/KG
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
1500
u
UG/KG
2-Nitroaniline
410 J
UG/KG
Benzo-a-Pyrene
580
u
UG/KG
Dimethyl Phthalate
430 J
UG/KG
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
580
u
UG/KG
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
580 U
UG/KG
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
580
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthylene
380 J
UG/KG
Benzo(ghi)Perylene
1500
u
UG/KG
3-Nitroaniline
43
%
% Moisture
580
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthene
1500
UR
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrophenol
1500
UJ
UG/KG
4-Nitrophenol
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Umberto, Guzman
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/14/2005 12:05
Ending:
Org Contractor: LIBRTY DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 17:49
Sample 156 FY 2006 Project: 06-0043
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Picayune Wood Treating Picayune, MS
Program: SF Case No: 34746
Id/Station: PW01SD/
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3AT6 Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS
UNITS
47000
J
UG/KG
2800
J
UG/KG
1800
NJ
UG/KG
1900
NJ
UG/KG
9100
NJ
UG/KG
7000
NJ
UG/KG
4300
NJ
UG/KG
N
UG/KG
ANALYTE
23 UNKNOWNS
UNKNOWN PAH (2 ISOMERS)
DODECANOIC ACID, HEXADECYL ESTER
VITAMIN E
.GAMMA.-SITOSTEROL
2 (1H) NAPHTHALENONE, 3,5,6,7,8,8A,HEXAHYDRO-4,8A-DIME
STIGMAST-4-E-3-ON E
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Umberto, Guzman
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/14/2005 12:05
Ending:
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 17:49
Sample 157 FY 2006 Project: 06-0043
Extractables Scan
Facility: Picayune Wood Treating Picayune, MS
Program: SF Case No: 34746
Id/Station: PW02SD /
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3AT7
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
690
U
UG/KG
Benzaldehyde
690 U
UG/KG
Dibenzofuran
690
U
UG/KG
Phenol
690 U
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
690
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether
690 U
UG/KG
Diethyl Phthalate
690
U
UG/KG
2-Chlorophenol
690 U
UG/KG
Fluorene
690
U
UG/KG
2-Methylphenol
690 U
UG/KG
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
690
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
1700 U
UG/KG
4-Nitroaniline
690
U
UG/KG
Acetophenone
1700 UJ
UG/KG
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol
690
U
UG/KG
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol
690 U
UG/KG
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine
690
U
UG/KG
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine
NA
UG/KG
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
690
U
UG/KG
Hexachloroethane
690 U
UG/KG
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
690
U
UG/KG
Nitrobenzene
690 U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
690
U
UG/KG
Isophorone
690 U
UG/KG
Atrazine
690
U
UG/KG
2-Nitrophenol
1700 U
UG/KG
Pentachlorophenol
690
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dimethylphenol
390 J
UG/KG
Phenanthrene
690
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane
280 J
UG/KG
Anthracene
690
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dichlorophenol
690 U
UG/KG
Carbazole
690
U
UG/KG
Naphthalene
690 U
UG/KG
Di-n-Butylphthalate
690
U
UG/KG
4-Chloroaniline
1300
UG/KG
Fluoranthene
690
U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobutadiene
1100
UG/KG
Pyrene
690
U
UG/KG
Caprolactam
690 U
UG/KG
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
690
u
UG/KG
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
690 UJ
UG/KG
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
690
u
UG/KG
2-Methylnaphthalene
420 J
UG/KG
Benzo(a)Anthracene
690
u
UG/KG
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)
890
UG/KG
Chrysene
690
u
UG/KG
2,4,6-T richlorophenol
1600
UG/KG
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
1700
u
UG/KG
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
690 U
UG/KG
Di-n-Octylphthalate
690
u
UG/KG
1,1 -Biphenyl
1000
UG/KG
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
690
u
UG/KG
2-Chloronaphthalene
780
UG/KG
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
1700
u
UG/KG
2-Nitroaniline
660 J
UG/KG
Benzo-a-Pyrene
690
u
UG/KG
Dimethyl Phthalate
580 J
UG/KG
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
690
u
UG/KG
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
180 J
UG/KG
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
690
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthylene
470 J
UG/KG
Benzo(ghi)Perylene
1700
u
UG/KG
3-Nitroaniline
52
%
% Moisture
690
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthene
1700
UR
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrophenol
1700
u
UG/KG
4-Nitrophenol
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Umberto, Guzman
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/14/2005 11:50
Ending:
Org Contractor: LIBRTY DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 17:49
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Umberto, Guzman
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/14/2005 11:50
Ending:
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
57000
J
UG/KG
21 UNKNOWNS
900
NJ
UG/KG
1,1'-BIPHENYL, BIS( 1 -METHYLETHYL)-
830
NJ
UG/KG
PYRENE, 1-METHYL-
2300
NJ
UG/KG
ANDROSTAN-6-ONE, (5.ALPHA. )-
5500
NJ
UG/KG
4 UNKNOWN PAHS
3900
NJ
UG/KG
STIGMAST-4-EN-3-ONE
N
UG/KG
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
Sample 157 FY 2006 Project: 06-0043
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Picayune Wood Treating Picayune, MS
Program: SF Case No: 34746
Id/Station: PW02SD /
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3AT7
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 17:49
Sample 158 FY 2006 Project: 06-0043
Extractables Scan
Facility: Picayune Wood Treating
Program: SF
Id/Station: PW02SW/
Media: SURFACE WATER
Picayune, MS
Case No: 34746
D No: 3AT8
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Umberto, Guzman
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/14/2005 11:45
Ending:
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
5ULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
10 UJ
UG/L
Benzaldehyde
10
U
UG/L
Dibenzofuran
10 u
UG/L
Phenol
10
u
UG/L
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
10 u
UG/L
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether
10
u
UG/L
Diethyl Phthalate
10 u
UG/L
2-Chlorophenol
10
u
UG/L
Fluorene
10 u
UG/L
2-Methylphenol
10
u
UG/L
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
10 u
UG/L
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
25
u
UG/L
4-Nitroaniline
10 u
UG/L
Acetophenone
25
u
UG/L
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol
10 u
UG/L
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol
10
u
UG/L
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine
10 u
UG/L
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine
NA
UG/L
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
10 u
UG/L
Hexachloroethane
10
U
UG/L
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
10 u
UG/L
Nitrobenzene
10
U
UG/L
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
10 u
UG/L
Isophorone
10
UJ
UG/L
Atrazine
10 u
UG/L
2-Nitrophenol
25
U
UG/L
Pentachlorophenol
10 u
UG/L
2,4-Dimethylphenol
10
U
UG/L
Phenanthrene
10 u
UG/L
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane
10
U
UG/L
Anthracene
10 u
UG/L
2,4-Dichlorophenol
10
UJ
UG/L
Carbazole
10 u
UG/L
Naphthalene
10
u
UG/L
Di-n-Butylphthalate
10 u
UG/L
4-Chloroaniline
10
u
UG/L
Fluoranthene
10 u
UG/L
Hexachlorobutadiene
10
u
UG/L
Pyrene
10 u
UG/L
Caprolactam
10
u
UG/L
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
10 u
UG/L
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
10
UJ
UG/L
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
10 u
UG/L
2-Methylnaphthalene
10
u
UG/L
Benzo(a)Anthracene
10 UJ
UG/L
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)
10
u
UG/L
Chrysene
10 u
UG/L
2,4,6-T richlorophenol
10
u
UG/L
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
25 U
UG/L
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
10
u
UG/L
Di-n-Octylphthalate
10 u
UG/L
1,1 -Biphenyl
10
u
UG/L
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
10 u
UG/L
2-Chloronaphthalene
10
u
UG/L
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
25 U
UG/L
2-Nitroaniline
10
u
UG/L
Benzo-a-Pyrene
10 u
UG/L
Dimethyl Phthalate
10
u
UG/L
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
10 u
UG/L
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
10
u
UG/L
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
10 u
UG/L
Acenaphthylene
10
u
UG/L
Benzo(ghi)Perylene
25 U
UG/L
3-Nitroaniline
10 u
UG/L
Acenaphthene
25 U
UG/L
2,4-Dinitrophenol
25 U
UG/L
4-Nitrophenol
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 17:49
Sample 159 FY 2006 Project: 06-0043
Extractables Scan
Facility: Picayune Wood Treating Picayune, MS
Program: SF Case No: 34746
Id/Station: PW03SD /
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3AT9
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
520
U
UG/KG
Benzaldehyde
520 U
UG/KG
Dibenzofuran
520
U
UG/KG
Phenol
520 U
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
520
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether
520 U
UG/KG
Diethyl Phthalate
520
U
UG/KG
2-Chlorophenol
520 U
UG/KG
Fluorene
520
U
UG/KG
2-Methylphenol
520 U
UG/KG
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
520
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
1300 U
UG/KG
4-Nitroaniline
520
U
UG/KG
Acetophenone
1300 UJ
UG/KG
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol
520
U
UG/KG
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol
520 U
UG/KG
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine
520
U
UG/KG
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine
NA
UG/KG
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
520
U
UG/KG
Hexachloroethane
520 U
UG/KG
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
520
U
UG/KG
Nitrobenzene
520 U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
520
U
UG/KG
Isophorone
520 U
UG/KG
Atrazine
520
U
UG/KG
2-Nitrophenol
1300 U
UG/KG
Pentachlorophenol
520
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dimethylphenol
120 J
UG/KG
Phenanthrene
520
U
UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane
140 J
UG/KG
Anthracene
520
U
UG/KG
2,4-Dichlorophenol
520 U
UG/KG
Carbazole
520
U
UG/KG
Naphthalene
520 U
UG/KG
Di-n-Butylphthalate
520
U
UG/KG
4-Chloroaniline
380 J
UG/KG
Fluoranthene
520
U
UG/KG
Hexachlorobutadiene
340 J
UG/KG
Pyrene
520
U
UG/KG
Caprolactam
520 U
UG/KG
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
520
u
UG/KG
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
520 UJ
UG/KG
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
520
u
UG/KG
2-Methylnaphthalene
130 J
UG/KG
Benzo(a)Anthracene
520
UJ
UG/KG
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)
270 J
UG/KG
Chrysene
520
u
UG/KG
2,4,6-T richlorophenol
520 U
UG/KG
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
1300
u
UG/KG
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
520 U
UG/KG
Di-n-Octylphthalate
520
u
UG/KG
1,1 -Biphenyl
310 J
UG/KG
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
520
u
UG/KG
2-Chloronaphthalene
160 J
UG/KG
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
1300
u
UG/KG
2-Nitroaniline
170 J
UG/KG
Benzo-a-Pyrene
520
u
UG/KG
Dimethyl Phthalate
190 J
UG/KG
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
520
u
UG/KG
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
520 U
UG/KG
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
520
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthylene
180 J
UG/KG
Benzo(ghi)Perylene
1300
u
UG/KG
3-Nitroaniline
37
%
% Moisture
520
u
UG/KG
Acenaphthene
1300
UR
UG/KG
2,4-Dinitrophenol
1300
UJ
UG/KG
4-Nitrophenol
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Umberto, Guzman
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/14/2005 12:40
Ending:
Org Contractor: LIBRTY DATA REPORTED ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-------
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
EPA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Production Date: 11/01/2005 17:49
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor: Umberto, Guzman
Project Leader: DHUNTER
Beginning: 10/14/2005 12:40
Ending:
Org Contractor: LIBRTY
RESULTS
UNITS
ANALYTE
110 NJ
UG/KG
4H-CYCLOPENTA [DEF] PHENANTHRENE
13000 J
UG/KG
20 UNKNOWNS
320 NJ
UG/KG
ANDROSTAN-6-ONE, (5. ALPHA.)-
2800 NJ
UG/KG
. GAMMA. -SITOSTEROL
N
UG/KG
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
Sample 159 FY 2006 Project: 06-0043
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Picayune Wood Treating Picayune, MS
Program: SF Case No: 34746
Id/Station: PW03SD /
Media: SEDIMENT D No: 3AT9
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. | J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. | UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. | NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. | NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. | A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
------- |