HIGHLIGHT/

HIGHLIGHT/ OF THE JPRING 2005 TECHNICAL JUPPORT PROJECT MEETING

For a second consecutive year, EPA's Technical Support Project (TSP) teamed with the National Association of Remedial
Project Managers (NARPM) for their 2005 annual training conference in Phoenix, AZ, May 23-27. The TSP's three
technical forums—the Engineering, Federal Facilities, and Ground Water Forums—seek to futher their goal of improving
technical outreach within the regions by integrating their training with NARPM. This year, 15 regional TSP members
participated as trainers or presenters in various training workshops, information sessions, panel sessions, and paper
sessions. The forums also met individually in business sessions to discuss current and future forum activities. This
newsletter highlights these activities. During their business sessions. Ground Water Forum members and invited speakers
presented technical discussions of ongoing research and field work. These presentations are also summarized below, and
the slides can be found in electronic format on the TSP's webpage at www.epa.gov/tio/tsp/meetings.htm. For more
information on the topics highlighted, or if you wish to become involved in forum activities, please contact your regional
TSP representative listed on page 4 of this newsletter.

Contents
~~	~~

Ground Water Forum

Page 1

Next Meeting

Page 2

Federal Facilities Forum

Page 2

Engineering Forum

Page 3

Emerging Contaminants

Page 3

Technical Support Project



Regional Contacts

Page 4

NewMembers

The TSP is always seeking new
members to participate in activities
of the Ground Water, Engineering,
and Federal Facilities Forums. If you
are interested, please contact your
regional TSP representative or a
forum co-chair listed at the end of
this newsletter. A complete list of
contact information is available at
www.epa.gov/tio/tsp/member.htm.

Ground Water Forum

In addition to their regular forum
business discussions. Ground Water
Forum hosted several technical
presentations:

•	Lynn Wood and Michael Brooks of
EPA's Ground Water and Ecosys-
tems Research Division (GWERD)
in Ada, OK, presented results of
their research project to assess the
benefits of aggressive in-situ
DNAPL source-zone remediation.
Their work involved comparing
mass flux measurements (using flux
meters and an adaptation of integral
pumping tests) before and after the
remedial actions at four sites.

•	Marc Zimmerman (U.S. Geological
Survey) discussed two field efforts
that involve: 1) determining the
effectiveness of push point samplers
to collect samples of pore water in
shallow sediment for volatile organic

compound (VOC) analysis; and 2)
comparing the effectiveness of
stainless steel push point samplers
and nylon screen diffusion samplers
in detecting metal-enriched ground
water in streambed sediments. The
first study found that push point
samplers can capture shallow pore
water without drawing in surface
water and can provide for fine-scale
mapping of VOCs and other con-
stituents. The second study found
pluses and minuses with both types
of samplers and identified some
systematic differences in concentra-
tion measurements of some metals.

• Ruth Izraeli (Region 2) described a
bench-scale treatability test of in-
situ chemical oxidation that involved
comparing the use of modified
Fenton's reagent and potassium
permanganate as oxidants at a site
contaminated with TCE and DCE.

[continued on page 2]

Recycled/Recyclable

Printed with Soy/Cartola Ink on paper that
contains at least 50% recycled fiber


-------


I

The Fall 2005 TSP meeting is scheduled for the week of October 24th at the
AmeriSuites Riverwalk in San Antonio, Texas. The theme of this meeting
will be optimization. Speakers will be invited to make presentations on
treatment optimization, with a special focus on case studies. Training in
long-term ground-water monitoring optimization modeling will also be
offered at the Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence (AFCEE) at
Brooks Air Force Base.

If you are interested in participating in this meeting, contact your regional
forum representative listed at the end of this newsletter.



[continued from page 1]

The bench-scale test was followed
by a field-scale pilot study of
Fenton's reagent. Ruth summarized
the lessons learned from both tests
and emphasized a need in the
Agency for in-depth, applications-
oriented guidance for emerging
technologies.

• Joel Hennessey (Region 3) ex-
plained to the forum members how
to use census data to determine
ground-water use near sites as well
as national and regional usage
trends. Joel also explained how to
use GIS viewers to depict census
data on aerial photographs and
topographic maps.

To obtain more information about
these technical topics, please visit
www, epa. gov/tio/tsp//meetin as .htm to
view the full slide presentations.

During follow-on business sessions,
Bernie Zavala (Region 10) summarized
his participation on the Waste
Research Coordination Team (WRCT)
and encouraged other forum members
to get involved. The WRCT is a multi-
year planning process for working

with all 10 regions to determine
research needs for EPA's Office of
Research and Development.

Helen Dawson (Region 8) provided an
update on the ongoing revisions to
OSWER Draft Guidance for
Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to
Indoor Air Pathway from
Groundwater and Soils. By the end of
summer, she hopes to send a revised
version of the document to forum
members to review. She encouraged
the forum to be active in indoor air
issues noting these issues involve
stratigraphy, determining whether
ground-water samples are
representative, changes in the water
table level, and other hydrogeologic
information.

Ken Lovelace (OSRTI) summarized
the effort by EPA's Office of
Superfund Remediation and
Technology Innnovation to develop
guidance on "remedy closure" for
ground-water remedies and exit
strategies for achieving remedy
closure. Development of an exit
strategy for the goal of plume
restoration would include criteria for
determining: when to shut down the
pump and treat system; when ground-

water levels have reached non-
pumping steady state; that cleanup
goals have been attained and will be
maintained with the system off; and
triggers for terminating or restarting
monitoring or the remedy, if
necessary.

The Ground Water Forum is working
on additional issue papers, including
finalizing a joint paper with the
Ecological Risk Assessment Forum on
ground water to surface water
contamination; planning a multi-level
well sampling comparison study; and
reviewing papers on site
characterization for monitored natural
attenuation, the inherent uncertainty
associated with sample measurements,
and ground-water sampling using
direct push technology.

Federal Facilities Forum

The Federal Facilities Forum
conducted a regional "roundup" of hot
issues affecting federal facilities in each
EPA region. Concerns raised by the
regional representatives included
performance-based contracts,
perchlorate, BRAC'05, alternate
concentration limits, and FUDS. Jim
Woolford, Director, Federal Facilities
Restoration and Reuse Office
(FFRRO), addressed the Agency's
response to many of these concerns

[continued on page 3]

Award Spotlight

OSWER awarded Ground Water
Forum member Bernie Zavala
(Regin 10) a bronze medal for
continuous service in bringing
ground-water expertise to the
program.

~~


-------
[continued from page 2]

during an earlier NARPM training
workshop.

John Quander (Technology Innovation
Program) distributed final copies of the
Federal Facilities Forum's issue paper
Perchlorctte Treatment Technology
Update (EPA 542-R-05-015) now
available on www.cluin.org. Following
an overview of the occurence and
toxicity of perchlorate and its physical
and chemical properties, the paper
describes a number of perchlorate
treatment technologies, the factors
affecting their performance, potential
limitations, and performance and cost
data.

The forum plans to continue their work
on the issue of perchlorate by reviewing
and commenting on a paper on the
monitored natural attenuation of
perchlorate, which GWERD is drafting.
The forum also will review an issue
paper on UXO being prepared by EPA's
National Risk Management Research
Laboratory (NRMRL) in Cincinnati.
Members discussed potential topics for
future issue papers, including how to
address sampling for asbestos and lead
at ammunition plants where buildings
containing these contaminants have
been burned or demolished in the past.

For the fall 2005 TSP meeting, the
forum is considering inviting federal
land management operations staff to
discuss mining operations and other
hazardous waste sites on non-DOD/
DOE federal facilities.

Engineering Forum

The Engineering Forum has finished
compiling and analyzing the data from
an expertise survey that they prepared

and distributed to remedial project
managers (RPMs) early in 2004. The
purpose of the survey was to:

•	gauge EPA's in-house engineering
expertise;

•	identify specific areas of strengths
and weaknesses;

•	identify training needs; and

•	possibly influence future hiring.

Sharon Hayes (Region 1) and Bill
Rothenmeyer (Region 8) presented the
survey results to NARPM members.
With 39% of the RPMs responding, the
forum found that 63% of RPMs
reported having at least one engineering
degree and an average of 13 years of
experience in the Superfund program.
On average, RPMs are managing 5.1
sites. The survey shows that work on
these sites is shifting toward the tail end
of the Superfund process pipeline (i.e.,
toward remedial action and post-
construction activities). The top five
training needs identified in the survey
were ground-water modeling, indoor air
contamination issues, bioremediation,
technical impracticability waivers, and
sediment issues. A need for a more
advanced level of training on these
topics was suggested. The forum is
looking to receive comments on the
draft survey report from the NARPM
co-chairs before presenting it to regional
and national Superfund management
later this year.

Dave Reisman (NRMRL) reported that
NRMRL will soon complete the second
drafts of Engineering Bulletins on the
topics of bioremediation, remediation of
PCBs, and mining issues. The
Engineering Forum plans to review and
comment on the new drafts. In addition,
the paper, In-Situ Contaminated Soil
Treatment Technologies, is nearing
completion.

The Screening Data Collection Paper
being developed jointly between the
Engineering Forum and the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers is ready for a final
review. The paper, which is also being
developed into an ASTM guide, will help
RPMs to select and obtain the desired
physical and chemical treatment process
design data at contaminated sites early in
the investigation stage. The deadline for
forum submission of comments to Ed
Mead (Corps of Engineers) on the latest
draft is July 2005. At that time, the
paper will be formatted for review by
EPA's Science and Ecosystem Support
Division in Athens, GA.

Possible future activities for the forum
include developing a checklist of close-
out considerations to add to the
Preliminary Close Out Report guidance
and writing an issue paper discussing
geotechnical issues to consider when
redeveloping brownfields sites.

Emerging Contaminants

The technical presentation of the
TSP's Fall 2004 meeting centered
around the theme of emerging
contaminants-chemicals that have
no MCLs yet have emerged as
potential threats to human health and
the environment. Experts from EPA,
state regulatory agencies, academia,
and consultants presented
information on the occurrence,
uptake, and treatment of these
chemicals, in particular perchlorate,
1,4-dioxane, and NDMA. The forums
also traveled to the Aerojet facility
and McClellan AFB outside of
Sacramento, CA, to tour treatment
facilities for these compounds.
Information on these topics and more
can be found on the TSP webpage at
www.epa.gov/tio/tsp/download/
2004 fall meeting/tech minutes.pdf.


-------
Technical Support Project Regional Contacts

GROUND WATER FORUM	FEDERAL FACILITIES FORUM ENGINEERING FORUM

REGION 1

Bill Brandon
Ernie Waterman
Richard Willey

Christine Williams*

Ray Cody
Sharon Hayes*

REGION 2

Robert Alvey
Andy Crossland
Ruth Izraeli
Kevin Willis

Paul Ingrisano

Mark Granger

REGION 3

Kathy Davies
Joel Hennessy

Steve Hirsh
Michelle Price-Fay

Andrew Palestini
Hilary Thornton
Frank Vavra

REGION 4

Dave Jenkins

BillO'Steen

Kay Wischkaemper

Julie Corkran
Carl Froede
Patsy Goldberg
Michelle Thornton

Jon Bomholm
Carmen Santiago-Ocasio
Leo Romanowski

REGION 5

Gwen Massenburg
Luanne Vanderpool

Gene Jablonowski
David Seely

Tony Holoska
Karen Mason-Smith
Bernard Schorle*

REGION 6

Dave Abshire
Greg Lyssy
Vince Malott

Mike Overbay
Chris Villarreal

Gene Keepper*
Gary Miller
Carlos Sanchez

REGION 7

Dave Drake
Lisa Gotto
Dan Gravatt
Jeff Johnson*
Bill Pedicino
Brian Zurbuchen

Scott Marquess

Steve Kinser

REGION 8

Helen Dawson
Kendra Morrison-Huang

Jerry Cross
Jim Kiefer*

Frances Costanzi
Bill Rothenmeyer

REGION 9

Kathy Baylor
Glenn Bruck
Rich Freitas
Herb Levine

Lida Tan

Harold Ball

REGION 10

Curt Black
Rene Fuentes
Marcia Knadle
Howard Orlean*
Jonathan Williams
Bemie Zavala

Harry Craig*

Neil Thompson

* Denotes Forum Co-Chair




-------