AdvisoryReport

410 Severn Avenue, Suite 109
Annapolis, Maryland 21403

voice 410-267-5700 • fax 410-267-5777' toll free 800-YOUR-BAY

Chesapeake Bay Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee
2001 Annual Report to the Chesapeake Executive Council

Since its creation in December 1984, the
Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee
(STAC) has worked to enhance scientific
communication and outreach throughout the
Chesapeake Bay watershed and beyond.

STAC provides scientific and technical advice
in various ways, including technical reports
and position papers, discussion groups,
assistance in organizing merit reviews of
Chesapeake Bay Program programs and
projects, technical conferences and
workshops and service by STAC members
on Bay Program subcommittees and
workgroups.

STAC serves as a liaison between the
scientific/engineering community and the Bay
Program. Through professional and academic contacts and organizational networks of its members, STAC
ensures close cooperation among and between the various research institutions and management agencies
represented in the Bay watershed. Below is an overview of STAC activities throughout the past year which have
included proactive workshops in which STAC selects the topic, responsive workshops in which the topics are
proposed to STAC, and external peer reviews.

Proactive Workshops

Low Impact Development: A New Comprehensive Technological Solution to Urban Stormwater
Management and Wet Weather Flow Control

Low Impact Development (LID) is a fundamental change in watershed management technology that is less
costly, more effective and more economically and environmentally sustainable than conventional approaches
used in protecting local receiving waters and the Chesapeake Bay.

The purpose of conducting this workshop was to provide participants with a thorough overview of the new low
impact development objectives, economic and environmental benefits, design principles, and management
practices. Attendees were introduced to the innovative LID principles and practices used in protecting and

Visit the Chesapeake Bay Program website:
http://www.chesapeakebay.net

The Chesapeake Bay Program is restoring the Bay through a partnership among the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency representing the federal government, the State of Maryland, the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania, the Commonwealth of Virginia, the District of Columbia, the Chesapeake Bay Commission, and participating citizen advisory groups.

If hi'", jfusilsu ti.iy

A VTVlJlVSlTOrt' ItffiniYZtVp


-------
Chesapeake Bay Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee 2001 Annual Report

Page 2

restoring watershed hydrology, the biological and
physical integrity of receiving waters, and non-point
pollution control.

Through the introduction of LID technology and
methods, participants of this workshop were shown
a new perspective in urban stormwater
management and gained a practical understanding
of how to apply this powerful new technological
solution to watershed and water resource protection
objectives. In addition to this overview of LID
principles, participants were told where they could
obtain more specific information about LID planning
and design criteria.

Exploring Alternative Management
Strategies for Chesapeake Bay Fisheries

In recent years in domestic and international
fisheries, innovative management practices have
been employed that seek to improve the efficiency
of the fishery while protecting the resource stock
and resulting in higher net benefits from fishing to
society.

This workshop brought together experts involved in
the development, design, and application of
alternative management strategies in a variety of
fisheries to meet with their counterparts involved in
Chesapeake Bay fisheries management and
address benefits and concerns surrounding these
alternative management techniques. These
methods, such as rights-based and other privilege-
access approaches, are being implemented across
the globe and may be applicable in the Chesapeake
Bay.

Workshop participants learned about the
advantages, disadvantages, successes, and failures
of alternative management options, as well as
whether these techniques support the principles of
multi-species and ecosystem management that are
planned for Chesapeake Bay fisheries. The
workshop worked through a series of breakout
groups on issues such as providing a link between

watermen and managers, and bringing more local
people into the process at the state level.

A report was issued summarizing the presentations
and providing the recommendations made by the
workgroups. It was also recommended that STAC
would work with the Living Resources
Subcommittee to incorporate a process to explore
alternative management techniques into
Chesapeake Bay Fisheries Management Plans.

Responsive Workshops

The Impact of Susquehanna
Sedimentation in the Chesapeake Bay

Dams, such as the Conowingo Dam on the
Susquehanna River, have historically acted as
sediment traps, thus reducing the amount of
sediments and nutrients that reach the Chesapeake
Bay.

As dams reach their maximum sediment storage
capacity, they no longer influence the ultimate fate
of sediments and nutrients transported by rivers.
The Conowingo Dam, for example, is now
approaching its steady state and this will lead to a
net effect of increased loads of sediments and
nutrients that will be transported into the
Chesapeake Bay.

The workshop addressed the issue of sediment
build-up behind the lower Susquehanna River dams
and its implications for Bay restoration efforts.
Participants developed and assessment of the
potential impacts of increased sediment delivery to
the Chesapeake Bay and evaluated the possible
effects of these sediments on the chemistry,
physics, and ecology of the Chesapeake Bay.
Scientists throughout the watershed addressed
topics such as sediment impacts on submerged
aquatic vegetation, benthic organisms, and the
chemistry and physics of the maximum turbidity
zone in the Chesapeake Bay.

Visit the Chesapeake Bay Program website:
http://www.chesapeakebay.net

The Chesapeake Bay Program is restoring the Bay through a partnership among the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency representing the federal government, the State of Maryland, the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania, the Commonwealth of Virginia, the District of Columbia, the Chesapeake Bay Commission, and participating citizen advisory groups.


-------
Chesapeake Bay Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee 2001 Annual Report

Page 3

This workshop was in support of the Susquehanna
River Basin Commission's Symposium, which was
held in December 2000, that determined possible
management actions for the reduction or limitation
of increased sediment loads from the Conowingo
Dam.

The Optimization of

Benefits from Wetlands Restoration

The purpose of this workshop was to provide
scientifically based advice aimed at improving state
and federal efforts to restore 25,000 acres of
wetlands in the Chesapeake Bay watershed by the
year 2010.

The participants worked to achieve two primary
objectives during the workshop were to review and
summarize the current state of the science
supporting wetland restoration in a landscape
context, emphasizing in particular siting, design,
and monitoring criteria appropriate to the
physiographic regions of the Chesapeake Bay
watershed; and, review and summarize the current
state of the science supporting meaningful
monitoring of wetland restorations for purposes of
determining ecological benefits in the landscape
context.

The participants discussed possible solutions to
gaps in technology and resources currently being
used in wetland restoration, reviewed existing
programs, and commented on what other
technologies are both available and applicable to
the Chesapeake Bay watershed.

The product of this workshop was a report that
included a compilation of information from
contributing scientists, a summary of the current
state of the science, and most importantly, a set of
siting, design, and monitoring guidelines
appropriate for use in the Chesapeake Bay
watershed.

Low Impact Development: Planning, Design,
and Implementation Workshop

During the previous fiscal year, several proactive
Low Impact Development (LID) workshops were
conducted throughout the Bay Region to give
participants an overview of the technology and its
potential value for helping preserve and restore
natural resources in the Bay Region. Due to the
success of this series of workshops, there was an
apparent need for additional series of LID
workshops, which would target specific audiences.

This new series of workshops was designed to
provide a technical approach to Low Impact
Development smart design activities, economic and
environmental benefits, design principals, and
management practices. It addressed the design
aspect of LID for storm water management
paradigms for both new development and urban
retrofit to protect and restore watershed hydrology,
receiving waters, living resources, and to meet
NPDES and TMDL goals. The workshop also
incorporated many of the Chesapeake Bay
Program's goals and those Chesapeake 2000
agreement commitments that focus on managing
urban storm water.

For this series of workshops, the instructors
coordinated with the various jurisdictions to tailor the
content of the individual workshops to each
jurisdiction's desired focus. Due to the continuing
success of these workshops, several more
workshop topics have been designated for the
future such as incorporation of the LID approach
into local government storm water programs, and
design and implementation of the LID approach.

Non-nutritive Feed
Issues in Chicken Production

This workshop surveyed the potential impact of
current feeding practices on the ecosystems of the
Chesapeake Basin emphasizing the possible
effects of pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other
additives used in feeds and excreted in animal

Visit the Chesapeake Bay Program website:
http://www.chesapeakebay.net

The Chesapeake Bay Program is restoring the Bay through a partnership among the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency representing the federal government, the State of Maryland, the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania, the Commonwealth of Virginia, the District of Columbia, the Chesapeake Bay Commission, and participating citizen advisory groups.


-------
Chesapeake Bay Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee 2001 Annual Report

Page 4

manures. The workshop is in response to
Chesapeake Bay stakeholder recommendations
from the Toxics Non-point Source Forum where
stakeholders identified animal feed and manure,
and its potential for toxic impacts, as an emerging
issue.

The workshop focused on agricultural issues with
emphasis on water quality and aquatic biota: human
health issues will not be addressed. Specific topics
included chicken feed additives, potential
environmental impacts of pharmaceuticals and
metals, and microbial resistance. These issues
need to be addressed within the Chesapeake Bay
Basin for the likelihood of occurrence and the
potential ramifications.

Migratory Fish Monitoring and Target-Setting
Workshop: Alosid Monitoring Workshop II

In November of 1997, the Chesapeake Bay Stock
Assessment Committee (CBSAC) held a workshop
which focused on the monitoring of alosids. The
participants of this workshop concluded that current
monitoring was providing useful information on
restoration activities being conducted, however,
there are monitoring and information gaps
concerning stock assessments and tributary specific
needs such as population sizes and habitats.

Currently STAC is planning a follow up workshop to
continue cross-jurisdictional discussions relative to
the management of the American Shad. The
Chesapeake 2000 agreement calls for the
assessment of trends in priority migratory species
as well as for the development of tributary specific
population targets by 2002.

This workshop will gather experts involved in alosid
and other migratory species research and
monitoring to evaluate the current monitoring
approach as it relates to the recovery of American
Shad, and these experts will discuss the methods
by which target population sizes for priority species
can be established. Emphasis will be placed on
identifying and evaluating methods that could be

used to develop tributary-specific targets for the
restoration of alosid fishes in the Chesapeake Bay.
This workshop is scheduled to be held on
December 12-13, 2001 in the region surrounding
BWI airport.

Filter Feeders:

A workshop to assess what we know, don't
know, but need to know to meet the Chesapeake
2000 agreement

The Chesapeake 2000 agreement establishes a
clear management objective "By 2004 assess the
effects of different population levels of filter feeders
such as menhaden, oysters and clams on Bay water
quality and habitat."

The overall purpose of the workshop will be to
better determine if the Bay community can fully
address this commitment by the desired date. A
two-day workshop will bring together resource
managers and scientists to fully explore the
feasibility of using existing ecosystem process
(EPM) and/or individually based models (IBM) to
address this and other commitments related to filter
feeders.

The principal topic of this workshop will be to
characterize the primary filter feeders of the Bay
both past and present. The meeting objective will be
to identify the existing models available to assess
the impacts of those primary filter feeds on the
Bay's water quality and habitat. Particular attention
will be focused on oysters, menhaden, and clams
as potential management options for
nutrient/sediment removal; however, other filter
feeders such as zooplankton and epibenthic fauna
will also be explored. In order to address the
commitments, a modeling framework will be
developed that includes both water quality and
ecosystem processes for assessing ecosystems
that contain primary filter feeders.

This workshop is currently in the early planning
stages and is scheduled to be held by the end of
2001, beginning of 2002.

Visit the Chesapeake Bay Program website:
http://www.chesapeakebay.net

The Chesapeake Bay Program is restoring the Bay through a partnership among the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency representing the federal government, the State of Maryland, the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania, the Commonwealth of Virginia, the District of Columbia, the Chesapeake Bay Commission, and participating citizen advisory groups.


-------
Chesapeake Bay Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee 2001 Annual Report

Page 5

External Peer Review

External Peer Review of the Draft Basin-wide Monitoring Strategy

The goal of the Chesapeake Bay Program's Basin Wide Monitoring Strategy is to create a comprehensive
monitoring program that will respond to the informational needs of environmental managers.

Bay Program managers and scientists are now recommending a whole ecosystem management approach,
which considers individual species, their habitats, trophic relationships, and their response to anthropogenic and
natural changes. This places additional demands on monitoring programs throughout the Chesapeake Bay
basin.

The objectives of this discussion were to obtain an external peer review of the draft monitoring strategy and the
priorities identified for future monitoring, and to provide a forum to exchange new ideas and perspectives for
monitoring the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed.

The monitoring strategy has been refocused on the Chesapeake 2000 agreement and now outlines the
monitoring needs required to meet the commitments outlined in this new agreement.

The panel concluded at the end of this discussion that the continuity of the data needs to be guarded while
introducing improvements and efficiencies, and that there is need for the Bay Program to play a larger role in
coordinating many contributing monitoring programs.

The panel presented the results of this review to the Implementation Committee at their January 24, 2001
meeting.

Visit the Chesapeake Bay Program website:
http://www.chesapeakebay.net

12/01

The Chesapeake Bay Program is restoring the Bay through a partnership among the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency representing the federal government, the State of Maryland, the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania, the Commonwealth of Virginia, the District of Columbia, the Chesapeake Bay Commission, and participating citizen advisory groups.


-------