NPL Site Narrative for Garland
Creosoting

GARLAND CREOSOTING

Longview, Texas

Federal Register Notice: October 22, 1999

Conditions at Proposal (July 1999): The Garland Creosoting
site is located in Gregg County, Longview, Texas, and
encompasses the approximately 12-acre property formerly
used by the Garland Creosoting Company for the manufacture
of creosote-treated wood products. Garland Creosoting
Company began wood treating operations at the facility in 1960
and filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in February 1997.
Investigations conducted while the facility was operational and
subsequent to its closure indicate that hazardous substances
used in the wood treating process have contaminated on-site
soil, ground water underlying the site, and nearby surface
waters.

Prior to 1985, wastewater generated by the Garland Creosoting
facility system was treated and discharged to five surface
impoundments to allow evaporation. Bottom sludges created in
the surface impoundments are classified as a hazardous waste
under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
Reportedly, the facility discontinued use of the surface
impoundments in 1985 and diverted treated wastewater to the
City of Longview wastewater collection and treatment system.
A sixth surface impoundment was used at the facility to contain
wastewater in the event of a spill from the process area or
wastewater treatment plant.


-------
In May 1986, Garland Creosoting decided to close the five
surface impoundments used as wastewater evaporation ponds.
A subsurface investigation indicated that the ground water in
the vicinity of the impoundments was contaminated, and 12
ground water monitoring wells were installed. In November
1989, the five surface impoundments were capped, leaving the
creosote contaminated sludge and soil in place. In June 1990,
the facility was issued a post-closure care permit for the
impoundments requiring that Garland Creosoting install,
operate, and monitor a ground water recovery system to
address the contamination. A ground water collection trench
was installed to intercept free creosote product and creosote-
contaminated ground water. The trench drained into a sump
from which the recovered ground water was pumped to the
wastewater treatment system and, following treatment,
discharged into the City of Longview system. During operation
of the system, the facility reported the presence of free
creosote product in some of the monitoring wells and ground
water contamination by creosote-related substances.

In May 1997, following Garland Creosoting's bankruptcy filing,
TNRCC inspected the facility. The inspection revealed that the
ground water treatment system had ceased operation and a
dark oily substance was observed flowing downhill from the
ground water collection trench sump into an intermittent creek
running along the southern border of the site. TNRCC
inspectors observed a 1,400-square-foot area of soil saturated
with creosote between the sump and the intermittent creek.
Stressed vegetation, stained soil, and creosote seeps were
noted along the bank of the intermittent creek. Ten 55-gallon
drums with labels indicating hazardous wastes were found in
an unlocked building. TNRCC initiated an emergency response
action in May 1997 to abate ongoing discharges and stabilize
the site.

The intermittent creek along which the stressed vegetation,
stained soil, and creosote seeps were observed runs
downstream approximately 1/3 mile where it meets the Iron
Bridge Creek southwest of the site. Approximately 1 and 3/4
miles downstream from its confluence with the intermittent


-------
creek, Iron Bridge Creek flows into the Sabine River. During a
November 1997 TNRCC site visit, seven sediment samples
were taken from the intermittent creek and Iron Bridge Creek.
Analyses of these samples indicated the presence of
polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and dibenzofuran,
contaminants commonly associated with creosoting processes.
PAHs and other creosote-related contaminants were detected
in samples collected from the surface impoundments, ground
water collection sump, and intermittent creek.

Both Iron Bridge Creek and Sabine River are actively fished for
flathead catfish, blue catfish, white bass, channel catfish,
crappie, large mouth bass, and spotted bass. According to the
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, these fish are primarily
caught for human consumption. In addition, wetlands exist
along the banks of Iron Bridge Creek and Sabine River
throughout the 15-mile distance considered potentially
susceptible to contamination from the site. The paddlefish, a
listed endangered species in the State of Texas, inhabits the
waters at the confluence of Sabine River and Iron Bridge
Creek, and is also considered potentially susceptible to
contamination from the site.

Status (October 1999): EPA is considering various alternatives
for the site.

[The description of the site (release) is based on information
available at the time the site was evaulated with the HRS. The
description may change as additional information is gathered
on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56 FR 5600,
February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.]

For more information about the hazardous substances
identified in this narrative summary, including general
information regarding the effects of exposure to these
substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR
ToxFAQs can be found on the Internet at
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaq.html or by telephone at 1-888-
42-ATSDR or 1-888-422-8737.


-------