Counties Projected to Violate 2008 Ozone Standard in 2020 (Model projections for 2020) (Only includes counties with monitors) Not projected to violate 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million Projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million STATE COUNTY Alabama Baldwin Alabama Clay Alabama Elmore Alabama Etowah Alabama Jefferson Alabama Lawrence Alabama Madison Alabama Mobile Alabama Montgomery Alabama Morgan Alabama Shelby Alabama Sumter Alabama Tuscaloosa Arizona Cochise Arizona Coconino Arizona Gila Arizona Maricopa Arizona Navajo Arizona Pima Arizona Pinal Arizona Yavapai Arkansas Crittenden Arkansas Montgomery Arkansas Newton Arkansas Pulaski Cal fornia Alameda Cal fornia Amador Cal fornia Butte Cal fornia Calaveras Cal fornia Colusa Cal fornia Contra Costa Cal fornia El Dorado Cal fornia Fresno Cal fornia Glenn Cal fornia Imperial Cal fornia Inyo Cal fornia Kern NOTES: i 1. Twenty-eight counties are projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 ppm. 2. Future ozone levels were projected only for counties with monitoring data and within the contiguous 48 states. 3. Modeled emissions reflect the expected reductions from federal programs including the Clean Air Interstate Rule, the Clean Air Mercury Rule, the Clean Air Visibility Rule, the Clean Air Nonroad Diesel Rule, the Light-Duty Vehicle Tier 2 Rule, the Heavy Duty Diesel Rule, proposed rules for Locomotive and Marine vessels and for Small Spark-Ignition Engines; as well as illustrative state and local level mobile and stationary source controls identified for the purpose of attaining the 1997 ozone and 2006 PM2.5 standards. States may choose to apply different control strategies for implementation. ------- Counties Projected to Violate 2008 Ozone Standard in 2020 (Model projections for 2020) (Only includes counties with monitors) Not projected to violate 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million Projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million STATE COUNTY Cal fornia Kings Cal fornia Lake Cal fornia Los Angeles Cal fornia Madera Cal fornia Marin Cal fornia Mariposa Cal fornia Mendocino Cal fornia Merced Cal fornia Mono Cal fornia Monterey Cal fornia Napa Cal fornia Nevada Cal fornia Orange Cal fornia Placer Cal fornia Plumas Cal fornia Riverside Cal fornia Sacramento Cal fornia San Benito Cal fornia San Bernardino Cal fornia San Diego Cal fornia San Francisco Cal fornia San Joaquin Cal fornia San Luis Obispo Cal fornia San Mateo Cal fornia Santa Barbara Cal fornia Santa Clara Cal fornia Santa Cruz Cal fornia Shasta Cal fornia Siskiyou Cal fornia Solano Cal fornia Sonoma Cal fornia Stanislaus Cal fornia Sutter Cal fornia Tehama Cal fornia Tulare Cal fornia Tuolumne Cal fornia Ventura Cal fornia Yolo NOTES: 2 1. Twenty-eight counties are projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 ppm. 2. Future ozone levels were projected only for counties with monitoring data and within the contiguous 48 states. 3. Modeled emissions reflect the expected reductions from federal programs including the Clean Air Interstate Rule, the Clean Air Mercury Rule, the Clean Air Visibility Rule, the Clean Air Nonroad Diesel Rule, the Light-Duty Vehicle Tier 2 Rule, the Heavy Duty Diesel Rule, proposed rules for Locomotive and Marine vessels and for Small Spark-Ignition Engines; as well as illustrative state and local level mobile and stationary source controls identified for the purpose of attaining the 1997 ozone and 2006 PM2.5 standards. States may choose to apply different control strategies for implementation. ------- Counties Projected to Violate 2008 Ozone Standard in 2020 (Model projections for 2020) (Only includes counties with monitors) Not projected to violate 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million Projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million STATE COUNTY Colorado Adams Colorado Arapahoe Colorado Boulder Colorado Denver Colorado Douglas Colorado El Paso Colorado Jefferson Colorado La Plata Colorado Larimer Colorado Montezuma Colorado Weld Connecticut Fairfield Connecticut Hartford Connecticut Litchfield Connecticut Middlesex Connecticut New Haven Connecticut New London Connecticut Tolland Delaware Kent Delaware New Castle Delaware Sussex District of Columbia Washington Florida Alachua Florida Baker Florida Bay Florida Brevard Florida Broward Florida Collier Florida Columbia Florida Duval Florida Escambia Florida Highlands Florida Hillsborough Florida Holmes Florida Lake Florida Lee Florida Leon Florida Manatee NOTES: 3 1. Twenty-eight counties are projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 ppm. 2. Future ozone levels were projected only for counties with monitoring data and within the contiguous 48 states. 3. Modeled emissions reflect the expected reductions from federal programs including the Clean Air Interstate Rule, the Clean Air Mercury Rule, the Clean Air Visibility Rule, the Clean Air Nonroad Diesel Rule, the Light-Duty Vehicle Tier 2 Rule, the Heavy Duty Diesel Rule, proposed rules for Locomotive and Marine vessels and for Small Spark-Ignition Engines; as well as illustrative state and local level mobile and stationary source controls identified for the purpose of attaining the 1997 ozone and 2006 PM2.5 standards. States may choose to apply different control strategies for implementation. ------- Counties Projected to Violate 2008 Ozone Standard in 2020 (Model projections for 2020) (Only includes counties with monitors) Not projected to violate 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million Projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million STATE COUNTY Florida Marion Florida Miami-Dade Florida Orange Florida Osceola Florida Palm Beach Florida Pasco Florida Pinellas Florida Polk Florida Santa Rosa Florida Sarasota Florida Seminole Florida St Lucie Florida Volusia Florida Wakulla Georgia Bibb Georgia Chatham Georgia Cherokee Georgia Clarke Georgia Cobb Georgia Coweta Georgia Dawson Georgia De Kalb Georgia Douglas Georgia Fayette Georgia Fulton Georgia Glynn Georgia Gwinnett Georgia Henry Georgia Murray Georgia Muscogee Georgia Paulding Georgia Richmond Georgia Rockdale Georgia Sumter Idaho Ada Idaho Butte Idaho Canyon Idaho Elmore NOTES: 4 1. Twenty-eight counties are projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 ppm. 2. Future ozone levels were projected only for counties with monitoring data and within the contiguous 48 states. 3. Modeled emissions reflect the expected reductions from federal programs including the Clean Air Interstate Rule, the Clean Air Mercury Rule, the Clean Air Visibility Rule, the Clean Air Nonroad Diesel Rule, the Light-Duty Vehicle Tier 2 Rule, the Heavy Duty Diesel Rule, proposed rules for Locomotive and Marine vessels and for Small Spark-Ignition Engines; as well as illustrative state and local level mobile and stationary source controls identified for the purpose of attaining the 1997 ozone and 2006 PM2.5 standards. States may choose to apply different control strategies for implementation. ------- Counties Projected to Violate 2008 Ozone Standard in 2020 (Model projections for 2020) (Only includes counties with monitors) Not projected to violate 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million Projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million STATE COUNTY Illinois Adams Illinois Champaign Illinois Clark Illinois Cook Illinois Du Page Illinois Effingham Illinois Hamilton Illinois Jersey Illinois Kane Illinois Lake Illinois Macon Illinois Macoupin Illinois Madison Illinois McHenry Illinois McLean Illinois Peoria Illinois Randolph Illinois Rock Island Illinois Sangamon Illinois St Clair Illinois Will Illinois Winnebago Indiana Allen Indiana Boone Indiana Carroll Indiana Clark Indiana Delaware Indiana Elkhart Indiana Floyd Indiana Gibson Indiana Greene Indiana Hamilton Indiana Hancock Indiana Hendricks Indiana Huntington Indiana Jackson Indiana Johnson Indiana La Porte NOTES: 5 1. Twenty-eight counties are projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 ppm. 2. Future ozone levels were projected only for counties with monitoring data and within the contiguous 48 states. 3. Modeled emissions reflect the expected reductions from federal programs including the Clean Air Interstate Rule, the Clean Air Mercury Rule, the Clean Air Visibility Rule, the Clean Air Nonroad Diesel Rule, the Light-Duty Vehicle Tier 2 Rule, the Heavy Duty Diesel Rule, proposed rules for Locomotive and Marine vessels and for Small Spark-Ignition Engines; as well as illustrative state and local level mobile and stationary source controls identified for the purpose of attaining the 1997 ozone and 2006 PM2.5 standards. States may choose to apply different control strategies for implementation. ------- Counties Projected to Violate 2008 Ozone Standard in 2020 (Model projections for 2020) (Only includes counties with monitors) Not projected to violate 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million Projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million STATE COUNTY Indiana Lake Indiana Madison Indiana Marion Indiana Morgan Indiana Porter Indiana Posey Indiana Shelby Indiana St Joseph Indiana Vanderburgh Indiana Vigo Indiana Warrick Iowa Bremer Iowa Clinton Iowa Harrison Iowa Linn Iowa Montgomery Iowa Palo Alto Iowa Polk Iowa Scott Iowa Story Iowa Van Buren Iowa Warren Kansas Linn Kansas Sedgwick Kansas Sumner Kansas Trego Kansas Wyandotte Kentucky Bell Kentucky Boone Kentucky Boyd Kentucky Bullitt Kentucky Campbell Kentucky Carter Kentucky Christian Kentucky Daviess Kentucky Edmonson Kentucky Fayette Kentucky Graves NOTES: g 1. Twenty-eight counties are projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 ppm. 2. Future ozone levels were projected only for counties with monitoring data and within the contiguous 48 states. 3. Modeled emissions reflect the expected reductions from federal programs including the Clean Air Interstate Rule, the Clean Air Mercury Rule, the Clean Air Visibility Rule, the Clean Air Nonroad Diesel Rule, the Light-Duty Vehicle Tier 2 Rule, the Heavy Duty Diesel Rule, proposed rules for Locomotive and Marine vessels and for Small Spark-Ignition Engines; as well as illustrative state and local level mobile and stationary source controls identified for the purpose of attaining the 1997 ozone and 2006 PM2.5 standards. States may choose to apply different control strategies for implementation. ------- Counties Projected to Violate 2008 Ozone Standard in 2020 (Model projections for 2020) (Only includes counties with monitors) Not projected to violate 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million Projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million STATE COUNTY Kentucky Greenup Kentucky Hancock Kentucky Hardin Kentucky Henderson Kentucky Jefferson Kentucky Jessamine Kentucky Kenton Kentucky Livingston Kentucky McCracken Kentucky McLean Kentucky Oldham Kentucky Perry Kentucky Pike Kentucky Pulaski Kentucky Scott Kentucky Simpson Kentucky Trigg Kentucky Warren Louisiana Ascension Louisiana Beauregard Louisiana Bossier Louisiana Caddo Louisiana Calcasieu Louisiana East Baton Rouge Louisiana Grant Louisiana Iberville Louisiana Jefferson Louisiana Lafayette Louisiana Lafourche Louisiana Livingston Louisiana Orleans Louisiana Ouachita Louisiana Pointe Coupee Louisiana St Bernard Louisiana St Charles Louisiana St James Louisiana St John The Baptist Louisiana St Mary NOTES: 7 1. Twenty-eight counties are projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 ppm. 2. Future ozone levels were projected only for counties with monitoring data and within the contiguous 48 states. 3. Modeled emissions reflect the expected reductions from federal programs including the Clean Air Interstate Rule, the Clean Air Mercury Rule, the Clean Air Visibility Rule, the Clean Air Nonroad Diesel Rule, the Light-Duty Vehicle Tier 2 Rule, the Heavy Duty Diesel Rule, proposed rules for Locomotive and Marine vessels and for Small Spark-Ignition Engines; as well as illustrative state and local level mobile and stationary source controls identified for the purpose of attaining the 1997 ozone and 2006 PM2.5 standards. States may choose to apply different control strategies for implementation. ------- Counties Projected to Violate 2008 Ozone Standard in 2020 (Model projections for 2020) (Only includes counties with monitors) Not projected to violate 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million Projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million STATE COUNTY Louisiana West Baton Rouge Maine Cumberland Maine Hancock Maine Kennebec Maine Knox Maine Oxford Maine Penobscot Maine Sagadahoc Maine York Maryland Anne Arundel Maryland Baltimore Maryland Carroll Maryland Cecil Maryland Charles Maryland Frederick Maryland Harford Maryland Kent Maryland Montgomery Maryland Prince Georges Maryland Washington Massachusetts Barnstable Massachusetts Berkshire Massachusetts Bristol Massachusetts Essex Massachusetts Hampden Massachusetts Hampshire Massachusetts Middlesex Massachusetts Norfolk Massachusetts Suffolk Massachusetts Worcester Michigan Allegan Michigan Benzie Michigan Berrien Michigan Cass Michigan Clinton Michigan Genesee Michigan Huron Michigan Ingham NOTES: £ 1. Twenty-eight counties are projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 ppm. 2. Future ozone levels were projected only for counties with monitoring data and within the contiguous 48 states. 3. Modeled emissions reflect the expected reductions from federal programs including the Clean Air Interstate Rule, the Clean Air Mercury Rule, the Clean Air Visibility Rule, the Clean Air Nonroad Diesel Rule, the Light-Duty Vehicle Tier 2 Rule, the Heavy Duty Diesel Rule, proposed rules for Locomotive and Marine vessels and for Small Spark-Ignition Engines; as well as illustrative state and local level mobile and stationary source controls identified for the purpose of attaining the 1997 ozone and 2006 PM2.5 standards. States may choose to apply different control strategies for implementation. ------- Counties Projected to Violate 2008 Ozone Standard in 2020 (Model projections for 2020) (Only includes counties with monitors) Not projected to violate 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million Projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million ISTATE COUNTY Michigan Kalamazoo Michigan Kent Michigan Lenawee Michigan Macomb Michigan Mason Michigan Missaukee Michigan Muskegon Michigan Oakland Michigan Ottawa Michigan Schoolcraft Michigan St Clair Michigan Washtenaw Michigan Wayne Minnesota Anoka Minnesota Carlton Minnesota Dakota Minnesota Lake Minnesota Mille Lacs Minnesota Scott Minnesota St Louis Minnesota Washington Mississippi Adams Mississippi Bolivar Mississippi De Soto Mississippi Hancock Mississippi Harrison Mississippi Hinds Mississippi Jackson Mississippi Lauderdale Mississippi Lee Mississippi Madison Mississippi Warren Missour Cass Missour Cedar Missour Clay Missour Greene Missour Jefferson Missour Monroe NOTES: 9 1. Twenty-eight counties are projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 ppm. 2. Future ozone levels were projected only for counties with monitoring data and within the contiguous 48 states. 3. Modeled emissions reflect the expected reductions from federal programs including the Clean Air Interstate Rule, the Clean Air Mercury Rule, the Clean Air Visibility Rule, the Clean Air Nonroad Diesel Rule, the Light-Duty Vehicle Tier 2 Rule, the Heavy Duty Diesel Rule, proposed rules for Locomotive and Marine vessels and for Small Spark-Ignition Engines; as well as illustrative state and local level mobile and stationary source controls identified for the purpose of attaining the 1997 ozone and 2006 PM2.5 standards. States may choose to apply different control strategies for implementation. ------- Counties Projected to Violate 2008 Ozone Standard in 2020 (Model projections for 2020) (Only includes counties with monitors) Not projected to violate 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million Projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million (STATE COUNTY Missouri Platte Missouri St Charles Missouri St Louis Missouri St Louis City Missouri Ste Genevieve Montana Flathead Nebraska Douglas Nebraska Lancaster Nevada Carson City Nevada Clark Nevada Douglas Nevada Washoe Nevada White Pine New Hampshire Belknap New Hampshire Carroll New Hampshire Cheshire New Hampshire Coos New Hampshire Grafton New Hampshire Hillsborough New Hampshire Merrimack New Hampshire Rockingham New Hampshire Strafford New Hampshire Sullivan New Jersey Atlantic New Jersey Bergen New Jersey Camden New Jersey Cumberland New Jersey Essex New Jersey Gloucester New Jersey Hudson New Jersey Hunterdon New Jersey Mercer New Jersey Middlesex New Jersey Monmouth New Jersey Morris New Jersey Ocean New Jersey Passaic New Mexico Bernalillo NOTES: 10 1. Twenty-eight counties are projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 ppm. 2. Future ozone levels were projected only for counties with monitoring data and within the contiguous 48 states. 3. Modeled emissions reflect the expected reductions from federal programs including the Clean Air Interstate Rule, the Clean Air Mercury Rule, the Clean Air Visibility Rule, the Clean Air Nonroad Diesel Rule, the Light-Duty Vehicle Tier 2 Rule, the Heavy Duty Diesel Rule, proposed rules for Locomotive and Marine vessels and for Small Spark-Ignition Engines; as well as illustrative state and local level mobile and stationary source controls identified for the purpose of attaining the 1997 ozone and 2006 PM2.5 standards. States may choose to apply different control strategies for implementation. ------- Counties Projected to Violate 2008 Ozone Standard in 2020 (Model projections for 2020) (Only includes counties with monitors) Not projected to violate 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million Projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million STATE COUNTY New Mexico Dona Ana New Mexico Eddy New Mexico San Juan New Mexico Sandoval New Mexico Valencia New York Albany New York Bronx New York Chautauqua New York Chemung New York Dutchess New York Erie New York Essex New York Hamilton New York Herkimer New York Jefferson New York Madison New York Monroe New York Niagara New York Oneida New York Onondaga New York Orange New York Oswego New York Putnam New York Queens New York Rensselaer New York Richmond New York Saratoga New York Schenectady New York Suffolk New York Ulster New York Wayne New York Westchester North Carolina Alexander North Carolina Avery North Carolina Buncombe North Carolina Caldwell North Carolina Caswell North Carolina Chatham NOTES: 11 1. Twenty-eight counties are projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 ppm. 2. Future ozone levels were projected only for counties with monitoring data and within the contiguous 48 states. 3. Modeled emissions reflect the expected reductions from federal programs including the Clean Air Interstate Rule, the Clean Air Mercury Rule, the Clean Air Visibility Rule, the Clean Air Nonroad Diesel Rule, the Light-Duty Vehicle Tier 2 Rule, the Heavy Duty Diesel Rule, proposed rules for Locomotive and Marine vessels and for Small Spark-Ignition Engines; as well as illustrative state and local level mobile and stationary source controls identified for the purpose of attaining the 1997 ozone and 2006 PM2.5 standards. States may choose to apply different control strategies for implementation. ------- Counties Projected to Violate 2008 Ozone Standard in 2020 (Model projections for 2020) (Only includes counties with monitors) Not projected to violate 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million Projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million STATE COUNTY North Carolina Cumberland North Carolina Davie North Carolina Duplin North Carolina Durham North Carolina Edgecombe North Carolina Forsyth North Carolina Franklin North Carolina Granville North Carolina Guilford North Carolina Haywood North Carolina Jackson North Carolina Johnston North Carolina Lenoir North Carolina Lincoln North Carolina Martin North Carolina Mecklenburg North Carolina New Hanover North Carolina Northampton North Carolina Person North Carolina Pitt North Carolina Randolph North Carolina Rockingham North Carolina Rowan North Carolina Swain North Carolina Union North Carolina Wake North Carolina Yancey North Dakota Billings North Dakota Cass North Dakota Dunn North Dakota McKenzie North Dakota Mercer North Dakota Oliver Ohio Allen Ohio Ashtabula Ohio Butler Ohio Clark Ohio Clermont NOTES: 12 1. Twenty-eight counties are projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 ppm. 2. Future ozone levels were projected only for counties with monitoring data and within the contiguous 48 states. 3. Modeled emissions reflect the expected reductions from federal programs including the Clean Air Interstate Rule, the Clean Air Mercury Rule, the Clean Air Visibility Rule, the Clean Air Nonroad Diesel Rule, the Light-Duty Vehicle Tier 2 Rule, the Heavy Duty Diesel Rule, proposed rules for Locomotive and Marine vessels and for Small Spark-Ignition Engines; as well as illustrative state and local level mobile and stationary source controls identified for the purpose of attaining the 1997 ozone and 2006 PM2.5 standards. States may choose to apply different control strategies for implementation. ------- Counties Projected to Violate 2008 Ozone Standard in 2020 (Model projections for 2020) (Only includes counties with monitors) Not projected to violate 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million Projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million STATE COUNTY Ohio Clinton Ohio Cuyahoga Ohio Delaware Ohio Franklin Ohio Geauga Ohio Greene Ohio Hamilton Ohio Jefferson Ohio Knox Ohio Lake Ohio Lawrence Ohio Licking Ohio Lorain Ohio Lucas Ohio Madison Ohio Mahoning Ohio Medina Ohio Miami Ohio Montgomery Ohio Portage Ohio Preble Ohio Stark Ohio Summit Ohio Trumbull Ohio Warren Ohio Washington Ohio Wood Oklahoma Adair Oklahoma Canadian Oklahoma Cherokee Oklahoma Cleveland Oklahoma Comanche Oklahoma Dewey Oklahoma Kay Oklahoma Mc Clain Oklahoma Oklahoma Oklahoma Ottawa Oklahoma Pittsburg NOTES: 13 1. Twenty-eight counties are projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 ppm. 2. Future ozone levels were projected only for counties with monitoring data and within the contiguous 48 states. 3. Modeled emissions reflect the expected reductions from federal programs including the Clean Air Interstate Rule, the Clean Air Mercury Rule, the Clean Air Visibility Rule, the Clean Air Nonroad Diesel Rule, the Light-Duty Vehicle Tier 2 Rule, the Heavy Duty Diesel Rule, proposed rules for Locomotive and Marine vessels and for Small Spark-Ignition Engines; as well as illustrative state and local level mobile and stationary source controls identified for the purpose of attaining the 1997 ozone and 2006 PM2.5 standards. States may choose to apply different control strategies for implementation. ------- Counties Projected to Violate 2008 Ozone Standard in 2020 (Model projections for 2020) (Only includes counties with monitors) Not projected to violate 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million Projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million STATE COUNTY Oklahoma Tulsa Oregon Clackamas Oregon Columbia Oregon Jackson Oregon Lane Oregon Marion Pennsylvania Adams Pennsylvania Allegheny Pennsylvania Armstrong Pennsylvania Beaver Pennsylvania Berks Pennsylvania Blair Pennsylvania Bucks Pennsylvania Cambria Pennsylvania Centre Pennsylvania Chester Pennsylvania Clearfield Pennsylvania Dauphin Pennsylvania Delaware Pennsylvania Erie Pennsylvania Franklin Pennsylvania Greene Pennsylvania Lackawanna Pennsylvania Lancaster Pennsylvania Lawrence Pennsylvania Lehigh Pennsylvania Luzerne Pennsylvania Lycoming Pennsylvania Mercer Pennsylvania Montgomery Pennsylvania Northampton Pennsylvania Perry Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania Tioga Pennsylvania Washington Pennsylvania Westmoreland Pennsylvania York Rhode Island Kent NOTES: 14 1. Twenty-eight counties are projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 ppm. 2. Future ozone levels were projected only for counties with monitoring data and within the contiguous 48 states. 3. Modeled emissions reflect the expected reductions from federal programs including the Clean Air Interstate Rule, the Clean Air Mercury Rule, the Clean Air Visibility Rule, the Clean Air Nonroad Diesel Rule, the Light-Duty Vehicle Tier 2 Rule, the Heavy Duty Diesel Rule, proposed rules for Locomotive and Marine vessels and for Small Spark-Ignition Engines; as well as illustrative state and local level mobile and stationary source controls identified for the purpose of attaining the 1997 ozone and 2006 PM2.5 standards. States may choose to apply different control strategies for implementation. ------- Counties Projected to Violate 2008 Ozone Standard in 2020 (Model projections for 2020) (Only includes counties with monitors) Not projected to violate 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million Projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million STATE COUNTY Rhode Island Providence Rhode Island Washington South Carolina Abbeville South Carolina Aiken South Carolina Anderson South Carolina Barnwell South Carolina Berkeley South Carolina Charleston South Carolina Cherokee South Carolina Chester South Carolina Chesterfield South Carolina Colleton South Carolina Darlington South Carolina Edgefield South Carolina Oconee South Carolina Pickens South Carolina Richland South Carolina Spartanburg South Carolina Union South Carolina Williamsburg South Carolina York South Dakota Pennington Tennessee Anderson Tennessee Blount Tennessee Davidson Tennessee Hamilton Tennessee Haywood Tennessee Jefferson Tennessee Knox Tennessee Lawrence Tennessee Meigs Tennessee Putnam Tennessee Rutherford Tennessee Sevier Tennessee Shelby Tennessee Sullivan Tennessee Sumner Tennessee Wlliamson NOTES: 15 1. Twenty-eight counties are projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 ppm. 2. Future ozone levels were projected only for counties with monitoring data and within the contiguous 48 states. 3. Modeled emissions reflect the expected reductions from federal programs including the Clean Air Interstate Rule, the Clean Air Mercury Rule, the Clean Air Visibility Rule, the Clean Air Nonroad Diesel Rule, the Light-Duty Vehicle Tier 2 Rule, the Heavy Duty Diesel Rule, proposed rules for Locomotive and Marine vessels and for Small Spark-Ignition Engines; as well as illustrative state and local level mobile and stationary source controls identified for the purpose of attaining the 1997 ozone and 2006 PM2.5 standards. States may choose to apply different control strategies for implementation. ------- Counties Projected to Violate 2008 Ozone Standard in 2020 (Model projections for 2020) (Only includes counties with monitors) Not projected to violate 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million Projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million STATE COUNTY Tennessee Wilson Texas Bexar Texas Brazoria Texas Brewster Texas Cameron Texas Collin Texas Dallas Texas Denton Texas El Paso Texas Ellis Texas Galveston Texas Gregg Texas Harris Texas Harrison Texas Hidalgo Texas Hood Texas Jefferson Texas Johnson Texas Kaufman Texas Montgomery Texas Nueces Texas Orange Texas Parker Texas Rockwall Texas Smith Texas Tarrant Texas T ravis Texas Victoria Texas Webb Utah Box Elder Utah Cache Utah Davis Utah Salt Lake Utah San Juan Utah Utah Utah Weber Vermont Bennington Vermont Chittenden NOTES: 16 1. Twenty-eight counties are projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 ppm. 2. Future ozone levels were projected only for counties with monitoring data and within the contiguous 48 states. 3. Modeled emissions reflect the expected reductions from federal programs including the Clean Air Interstate Rule, the Clean Air Mercury Rule, the Clean Air Visibility Rule, the Clean Air Nonroad Diesel Rule, the Light-Duty Vehicle Tier 2 Rule, the Heavy Duty Diesel Rule, proposed rules for Locomotive and Marine vessels and for Small Spark-Ignition Engines; as well as illustrative state and local level mobile and stationary source controls identified for the purpose of attaining the 1997 ozone and 2006 PM2.5 standards. States may choose to apply different control strategies for implementation. ------- Counties Projected to Violate 2008 Ozone Standard in 2020 (Model projections for 2020) (Only includes counties with monitors) Not projected to violate 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million Projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million STATE COUNTY Virginia Alexandria City Virginia Arlington Virginia Caroline Virginia Charles City Virginia Chesterfield Virginia Fairfax Virginia Fauquier Virginia Frederick Virginia Hampton City Virginia Hanover Virginia Henrico Virginia Loudoun Virginia Madison Virginia Page Virginia Prince Wlliam Virginia Roanoke Virginia Rockbridge Virginia Stafford Virginia Suffolk City Virginia Wythe Washington Clallam Washington Clark Washington King Washington Klickitat Washington Mason Washington Pierce Washington Skagit Washington Spokane Washington Thurston Washington Whatcom West Virginia Berkeley West Virginia Cabell West Virginia Greenbrier West Virginia Hancock West Virginia Kanawha West Virginia Monongalia West Virginia Ohio West Virginia Wood NOTES: 17 1. Twenty-eight counties are projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 ppm. 2. Future ozone levels were projected only for counties with monitoring data and within the contiguous 48 states. 3. Modeled emissions reflect the expected reductions from federal programs including the Clean Air Interstate Rule, the Clean Air Mercury Rule, the Clean Air Visibility Rule, the Clean Air Nonroad Diesel Rule, the Light-Duty Vehicle Tier 2 Rule, the Heavy Duty Diesel Rule, proposed rules for Locomotive and Marine vessels and for Small Spark-Ignition Engines; as well as illustrative state and local level mobile and stationary source controls identified for the purpose of attaining the 1997 ozone and 2006 PM2.5 standards. States may choose to apply different control strategies for implementation. ------- Counties Projected to Violate 2008 Ozone Standard in 2020 (Model projections for 2020) (Only includes counties with monitors) Not projected to violate 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million Projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 parts per million STATE COUNTY Wisconsin Brown Wisconsin Columbia Wsconsin Dane Wsconsin Dodge Wsconsin Door Wsconsin Florence Wsconsin Fond Du Lac Wsconsin Green Wsconsin Jefferson Wsconsin Kenosha Wsconsin Kewaunee Wsconsin Manitowoc Wsconsin Marathon Wsconsin Milwaukee Wsconsin Oneida Wsconsin Outagamie Wsconsin Ozaukee Wsconsin Racine Wisconsin Rock Wsconsin Sauk Wsconsin Sheboygan Wsconsin St Croix Wsconsin Vernon Wisconsin Vilas Wsconsin Walworth Wisconsin Washington Wisconsin Waukesha Wisconsin Wnnebago Wyoming Campbell Wyoming Teton NOTES: 18 1. Twenty-eight counties are projected to violate the 2008 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 ppm. 2. Future ozone levels were projected only for counties with monitoring data and within the contiguous 48 states. 3. Modeled emissions reflect the expected reductions from federal programs including the Clean Air Interstate Rule, the Clean Air Mercury Rule, the Clean Air Visibility Rule, the Clean Air Nonroad Diesel Rule, the Light-Duty Vehicle Tier 2 Rule, the Heavy Duty Diesel Rule, proposed rules for Locomotive and Marine vessels and for Small Spark-Ignition Engines; as well as illustrative state and local level mobile and stationary source controls identified for the purpose of attaining the 1997 ozone and 2006 PM2.5 standards. States may choose to apply different control strategies for implementation. ------- |