Lower Duwamish Waterway Superfund Site	November2007

Two Important Reports Completed for the
Lower Duwamish Waterway Superfund Site

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) have approved two
important reports about the risks from sediment contamination in the Lower Duwamish Waterway. One report is the
Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA), which estimates the risk to people living, working and playing along the
waterway, and eating fish and shellfish found there. The other report is the Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA),
which estimates the risks to animals that live in and along the waterway.

The two reports look at how people and animals might be exposed to Duwamish chemical contaminants and what
health risks they might face. This fact sheet provides a summary of information in these reports. EPA and Ecology
will use these reports to help determine which contaminants and which parts of the Duwamish Waterway need to be
cleaned up. You can find these documents at the information repositories listed on the back of this fact sheet.

The reports also provide information that the Washington State Department of Health can use when advising people
how to protect their health while EPA and Ecology continue studies of Lower Duwamish Waterway contamination.
See the Department of Health recommendations for reducing your exposure to contaminated sediments (mud), fish,
and shellfish.

What does the Human Health Risk
Assessment tell us?

There are many chemical contaminants in Duwamish
sediments, fish, and shellfish. Most of the health risk
comes from four contaminants: PCBs, arsenic, dioxins,
and PAHs. (See page 5 for more information.) Of these,
the highest risk is from exposure to PCBs
(polychlorinated biphenyls).

People may be exposed to contaminants in the waterway
in various ways, such as eating fish and shellfish, getting
waterway sediments on their skin, and accidentally
getting sediments in their mouth. The risks from eating
Duwamish fish and shellfish are much higher than risks
from the other exposures. An insert to this factsheet
provides Washington Department of Health
recommendations about how you can reduce your risk
from contaminated sediments, fish, and shellfish.

Eating Duwamish fish and shellfish
is a health risk:

For people who eat Duwamish fish and shellfish three
times a week, the risk of cancer and non-cancer health
effects is about ten times higher than EPA's "acceptable
risk range." Eating less than the estimated three meals
a week reduces risk.

PCBs are responsible for most of the risk from eating
Duwamish fish, compared to other contaminants in fish.
Arsenic and PAHs are responsible for most of the risk

from eating Duwamish clams. Dioxins are found in
sediments and are assumed to pose a risk in fish and
shellfish, based on studies in other areas that show how
dioxins accumulate in seafood.

Duwamish resident fish are more
contaminated than salmon:

Salmon that return to the Duwamish Waterway spend
most of their lives in the ocean, where they accumulate
PCBs and other contaminants in their bodies. Other
Duwamish fish, such as English sole, spend most of their
lives in the waterway. These "resident" fish accumulate
more contaminants from the Duwamish than salmon do.
For this reason, the human health risk assessment
estimated risk from eating resident fish, not salmon.

Risks from Duwamish mud depend
on activities and areas:

The human health risk assessment evaluated sediments
in the waterway that people can readily contact —
sediments that are under water at high tides but
accessible at lower tides.

People may come into contact with these "intertidal"
sediments because they are in areas where they have
easy access from the shoreline, such as next to homes in
the South Park neighborhood and at Duwamish
Waterway Park. Sediments in more accessible areas
near homes and parks are generally less contaminated
than those in industrial areas.


-------
The risk assessment estimated the risks to young
children who frequently play in easily accessible
sediments (for example, every other day during the
summer) and found that the risks are relatively low but
are above "threshold" levels of concern for EPA and

Ecology. EPA and Ecology will consider whether cleanup
or other actions are needed to reduce people's risk.

Risks are lower for older children and adults (for
example, dog walkers), and for children playing in the
mud less frequently.

Harbor
Island

Georgetown

South
Park

Turning Basin

kwila

Herring's House
Park

Kellogg Island

Duwamish Waterway
Park

City of Seattle

Duwamish/Diagonal
Way Combined
Sewer Overflow
Storm Drain

Legend

Areas easily accessible
to the public during low
tide

Most contaminated
intertidal areas

Boeing Plant II

Norfolk Combined
Sewer Overflow

2


-------
Other intertidal areas are located near industrial

properties. Some of these areas have high levels of
contamination. As with fish and shellfish, the
contaminants responsible for most of the risks due to
contact with sediments are RGBs, PAHs. arsenic, and
dioxins. Most of the industrial areas are more difficult for
the public to reach by land, but they can be reached by
boat. The risk assessment showed low risk to people
who have little skin contact with sediment, but
higher risks for people who might frequently dig for
clams. Risks are higher for people who dig clams in
industrial areas than in easily accessible areas, EPA and
Ecology recommend that people minimize their use of the
most contaminated areas.

Tribal fishers who use nets may be exposed to
contaminants picked up on fishing nets that touch the
bottom or banks in contaminated areas of the Duwamish,
Tribal fishers may be exposed through skin contact with
the mud on their nets and through unknowingly
swallowing small amounts when their hands touch their
mouths (when eating, for example). Risks for net fishing
are similar to those for children playing at the beach.

Some industrial areas and nearby sediments are going to
be cleaned up over the next few years, EPA and Ecology
will use the results of the risk assessments to help
determine what additional areas need to be cleaned up.
For now, you can reduce your risks from contaminated
sediments by following Washington Department of Health
recommendations (see insert).

What does the Ecological Risk Assessment
tell us?

The Ecological Risk Assessment evaluated risks to
mammals, birds, fish and organisms that live in the
Duwamish sediments (intertidal sediments and sediments
that are always under water). The risk assessment
compared levels of contaminants in the tissues of these
animals, the sediments, or their food to levels of
ecological concern based on scientific studies.

The Ecological Risk Assessment found that the
contaminant that poses the greatest risk to mammals is
PCBs. River otters in the Duwamish may be exposed to
enough PCBs in their food to reduce the growth or
survival of their offspring.

In addition, sediment in about one quarter of the Lower
Duwamish Waterway contains many contaminants at
levels higher than State of Washington standards. The
standards are designed to protect worms, clams and
other organisms that live in the sand or mud. These
creatures are eaten by fish and other animals, so harm to
them affects the whole ecosystem.

Comparing the results of the Human Health Risk
Assessment and the Ecological Risk Assessment, EPA
and Ecology believe that cleaning up the Duwamish to
protect those at greatest risk - people, river otters, and
organisms that live in the sediment - will protect the
waterway's fish and birds, too.

How was the Human Health Risk Assessment

developed?

EPA and Ecology looked at ways people might be
exposed to Duwamish contamination and focused on the
following groups:

•	Tribal members regularly fishing in the Lower
Duwamish Waterway

•	People regularly clamming in the Lower Duwamish
Waterway

•	People eating large amounts of fish and shellfish, with
a particular focus on tribal children, adult tribal

members, Asians, and Pacific Islanders

•	Children playing frequently in the Lower Duwamish
mud

•	People who walk below the high tide line or who walk
their dogs there

For each group or "scenario", scientists estimated how
much of each contaminant a person might be exposed to
(the dose). Scientific information relating chemicals to
health effects (toxicity information) was combined with
the dose to estimate the risk that peoples' health might
be affected. The risks for individual contaminants were
added together to show the total risk from exposure to
contamination in the Lower Duwamish Waterway.

Methods used to calculate risk are designed to over-
estimate an 'average' person's risk. This way, cleanup
and other actions to reduce risk will also protect
'sensitive' groups of people (like children, the elderly, and
pregnant women) and other groups with unique
characteristics (such as tribal members, who are likely to
eat more fish and shellfish).

How do EPA and Ecology use risk estimates

in cleanups?

The human health risk assessment estimates the
probability that a person will get cancer as a result of
exposure to site contaminants. This probability is
described in terms of one in a thousand, one in a million,
and similar estimates.

One in a thousand is a level of risk that is too high —
reducing the risk is almost always appropriate. Risk can
be reduced through reducing contaminant levels or
limiting human exposure to the contaminants. Some
examples of risk reduction are cleanup actions, physical
barriers, legal controls on land use, education, or a
combination of these.

One in one million is a "threshold" level of risk below
which agencies generally do not require such action.

Between these risk levels is the "acceptable risk range,"
Whether agency action is needed for risks in this range
depends on many factors, including how confident
agency scientists and decisionmakers are in the risk
estimates, and how the contaminant levels compare to
background concentrations.

When contaminated areas of a site pose risks that
warrant action, the cleanup levels (contaminant levels to
be reached after cleanup) and other responses should

3


-------
reduce risk to a level selected from within this range. It
must also take into consideration Ecology's risk threshold
of one in one hundred thousand (which falls in the middle
of EPA's range).

EPA and Ecology use a similar approach to estimating
the potential for non-cancer health effects and selecting
cleanup goals. Cleanup goals may also be developed to
reduce ecological risk and comply with environmental
standards.

Was the local community involved in telling
scientists where and how people actually
come in contact with contaminants along the
Lower Duwamish Waterway?

Yes. The Duwamish River Cleanup Coalition (DRCC)
participated in a bank-to-bank survey of the waterway,
pointing out where people play, walk, boat, or otherwise
have access to the river and its sediments. DRCC and
representatives of Native American tribes who use the
waterway worked with scientists to help develop
'scenarios'. These scenarios describe how people could
come in contact with contamination,

DRCC is the community advisory group for the site.
Neither the tribes nor DRCC necessarily endorse the
conclusions of the risk assessments. Please see the
back of this fact sheet for more information about
the DRCC.

Who wrote the reports?

The Lower Duwamish Waterway Group wrote the human
health risk assessment and the ecological risk
assessment reports with oversight from EPA and
Ecology. These risk assessments are part of the larger
Remedial Investigation.

The Lower Duwamish Waterway Group consists of the
City of Seattle. King County, the Port of Seattle, and the
Boeing Company. The group is studying the Lower
Duwamish site under an agreement with EPA and
Ecology.

What happens next?

EPA and Ecology are reviewing the draft Remedial
Investigation report. The community advisory group, the
Muckleshoot and Suquamish Tribes, and other
government agencies also are reviewing the report. The
report describes the results of six years of testing in the
waterway.

With oversight from EPA and Ecology, the Lower
Duwamish Waterway Group will then evaluate sediment
cleanup alternatives in a report called a feasibility study.
Based on the remedial investigation and feasibility study,
EPA and Ecology will develop a proposed cleanup plan
for the Duwamish.

Cleanup of the waterway sediments will be coordinated
with cleanup and pollution control efforts on properties
near the waterway. Sediments in some areas have
already been cleaned up, and more will be cleaned up in
the next several years. EPA and Ecology's proposed
cleanup plan will address remaining sediment
contamination in the waterway.

How will EPA and Ecology involve the public
in cleanup decisions?

EPA and Ecology will request formal public comments on
the proposed cleanup plan. Until then, EPA and Ecology
will continue to meet with the public informally to provide
updates, answer questions, and listen to community
concerns.

Background

The Lower Duwamish Waterway has served as Seattle's major industrial corridor since it was created by
widening and straightening the Lower Duwamish River in the early 1900s, Activities on the waterway have
included boat manufacturing and repair, marina operations, airplane parts manufacturing, cement
manufacturing, metals fabrication and marine transport operations, as well as many others. In addition,
approximately two hundred outfalls discharge into the waterway. These include outfalls for storm water,
combined sewer overflows, and emergency overflows.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) added the Lower Duwamish Waterway site to the Superfund list
on September 13, 2001. This is EPA's list of the nation's most contaminated hazardous waste sites that are targeted
for investigation and cleanup. The Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) added the site to the
Washington State Hazardous Sites List on February 26, 2002.

4


-------
Comparison of Risks for Different Types of Activities
on the Lower Duwamish Waterway

2.5 in 1000

2 in 1,000

1.5 in 1,000

1 in 1,000

5 in 10,000

2 in 1,000

1 000 000 2 in 100>000 3 in 100,000 1 in 10,000

adult dog child beach net fishing clam digging	seafood

walker (200 play (65 (119 (120	consumption,

days/year) days/year) days/year) days/year)	three meals

"		'	per week

direct sediment contact risks

Type of Activity

What Are the Most Harmful Contaminants in the Lower Duwamish Waterway?

There are many chemical contaminants in Duwamish sediments, fish, and shellfish. Most of the health risk comes
from the four discussed below.

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are manmade chemicals that were banned in the late 1970s. They stay in the
environment for a long time and can build up in fish and shellfish. Children exposed to PCBs may develop learning
and behavior problems later in life. PCBs are known to impact the immune system and may cause cancer in people
who have been exposed over a long time. PCBs are found in sediments throughout the Lower Duwamish
Waterway and are generally highest near industrial areas.

Arsenic is naturally present at low levels in Puget Sound area rock and soil. Industrial activities have spread
additional arsenic over much of the Puget Sound region. Long-term exposure to toxic forms of arsenic may cause
skin, bladder, and other cancers.

•	Levels of inorganic arsenic (the most toxic form of arsenic) in most Duwamish fish and shellfish are similar to
those in other parts of Puget Sound. However, clams from the Duwamish Waterway had much higher levels of
inorganic arsenic than found elsewhere in Puget Sound.

•	In easily accessible areas of the waterway, levels of arsenic in sediment are generally similar to arsenic levels in
Seattle soils.

•	In the more difficult to access areas of the Lower Duwamish Waterway, some of the sediments contain arsenic
levels higher than Seattle soils.

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are formed during the burning of substances such as
coal, oil, gas, wood, garbage and tobacco and during the charbroiling of meat. Long periods of
breathing, eating, or having skin contact with high levels of some of the PAHs may increase a person's risk of
cancer. PAHs are present in sediments throughout the Lower Duwamish Waterway and are generally highest near
industrial areas.

Dioxins and furans (dioxins) are by-products of burning (either in natural or industrial settings), chemical
manufacturing and metal processing. Dioxins last a long time in the environment and, like PCBs, can build up in
fish and fatty foods. Specific toxic effects related to dioxins include: reproductive problems, problems in fetal
development or in early childhood, immune system damage, and cancer. Dioxins are commonly found in urban and
industrial soils and sediments. In some areas in the Duwamish, dioxin concentrations in the sediment are elevated
above typical urban concentrations.

5


-------
Where Can I Learn More? How Can I Get involved?

The best way for people to get involved with the
cleanup is to join the local citizens' advisory group
called the Duwamish River Cleanup Coalition. A
Superfund community advisory group is made up of
members of the community and is designed to serve

as the focal point for the exchange of information
among the local community and EPA, the state
regulatory and other pertinent federal agencies
involved in cleanup of the Superfund site.

Duwamish River Cleanup Coalition

5410 First Avenue NE
Seattle. WA 98105
(206) 954-0218
info@duwamishcleanup.org
www.duwamishcleanup.org

Information Repositories:

South Park Public Library

8604 Eighth Ave. S.

Seattle. WA98108
206-615-1688

EPA Records Center

1200 6th Avenue

Seattle. Washington 98101

206-553-4494

Environmental Protection Agency:

Renee Dagseth, Community Involvement Coordinator 206-553-1889 or dagseth.renee@epa.gov.

Visit EPA's website at:
http://yosemite.epa.gov/r10/cleanup.nsf/sites/lduwamish

Washington State Department of Ecology :

Justine Asohmbom: 425-649-7135 or juas461 @ecy.wa.gov

Visit Ecology's website at:
http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/tcp/sites/lower_duwamish/lower_duwamish_hp.html

The Lower Duwamish Waterway Group's web site: www.ldwg.org
contains all final reports the group has prepared to date, along with other information.

AFPA

Pre-Sorted Standard

IrtiA

Postage and Fees Paid



U.S. EPA

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

Permit No. G-35

1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, ETPA-081

Seattle, WA

Seattle, Washington 98101-3140



Lower Duwamish Waterway
Seattle, WA
November 2007

I I Alternative formats are available. For reasonable accommodation, please call Renee Dagseth at 206-553-1889.
[ | TTY users, please call the Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339.

6


-------