EPA/600/R-22/241 | October 2022

Sustainable and
Healthy Communities

Strategic Research Action Plan

Fiscal Years 2023-2026

Office of Research and Development
Immediate Office of the Assistant Administrator
Sustainable and Healthy Communities Research Program


-------
EPA/600/R-22/241

Sustainable and Healthy
Communities (SHC)

Strategic Research Action Plan
Fiscal Years 2023-2026

Disclaimer: This document is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review
under applicable information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent

any Agency determination or policy.


-------
Foreword



ft

A little more than 50 years ago, at a time when thick, visible soot obscured
the sunrise and the threat of toxic industrial legacies undermined
community health and development, the American people looked to a
newly formed federal entity—the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA)—to lead a path forward.

In the ensuing decades, a remarkable success story has unfolded in
improving our air, water, and land. These achievements have been built on
a legacy of scientific research to better understand the links between
people, our environment, and public health. EPA's Office of Research and
Development (ORD) continues to be a world leader in this research.

Today, I am pleased to share with you the next chapter in EPA's
commitment to delivering the research needed to meet the existing and emerging environmental
challenges of today: ORD's Strategic Research Action Plans (StRAPs) for fiscal years 2023 to 2026. There
are six StRAPs, one for each of ORD's highly coordinated and transdisciplinary National Research
Programs (NRPs), which align with the Agency's strategic goals: Air, Climate, and Energy (ACE); Chemical
Safety for Sustainability (CSS); Health and Environmental Risk Assessment (HERA); Homeland Security
(HS); Safe and Sustainable Water Resources (SSWR); and Sustainable and Healthy Communities (SHC).

Each StRAP is focused to harness the expertise of ORD's leading-edge researchers in their respective
disciplines. We identified six cross-cutting priorities—environmental justice, climate change, cumulative
impacts, community resilience, children's environmental health, and contaminants of immediate and
emerging concern—for close coordination throughout research planning and implementation. The
StRAPs also anticipate emerging issues and identify research that will build the foundation needed to
address those issues into the future.

The StRAP development process was informed by active engagement to gather input from a diversity of
both internal and external Agency partners and stakeholders. These include Agency program and
regional offices, Tribes, state agencies, public health and environmental organizations,
nongovernmental organizations and associations, and the scientific community. Each of the StRAPs
benefited from independent peer review provided by EPA's external Board of Scientific Counselors.

By working collaboratively and embracing partnerships from across a wide spectrum of environmental
and public health professionals, our strategic research plans identify our most pressing public health and
environmental challenges and outline concrete plans that will deliver accessible and relevant science to
inform effective decisions regarding those challenges.

The StRAPs renew our commitment to upholding the highest levels of scientific integrity as we continue
to provide the critical, high quality, and credible science the Agency and our partners rely on to make
science-based decisions to protect public health and the environment.

Together, we are ushering in a new generation of environmental research that is poised to lay the
groundwork for another 50 years of achievement, and beyond.

H. Christopher Frey, Ph.D.
Assistant Administrator for Research and Development

i | P a g e


-------
Table of Contents

FOREWORD	I

LIST OF ACRONYMS	IV

DEFINITIONS	VI

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY	Vli

INTRODUCTION	1

SOLUTIONS-DRIVEN RESEARCH	1

PROGRAM VISION	2

STRATEGIC DIRECTION	3

Relationship to EPA and ORD Strategic Plans	3

Changes from FY 19-22 STRAP	4

PARTNER ENGAGEMENT	5

RESEARCH TOPICS AND RESEARCH AREAS	5

Topic 1: Advancing Remediation and Restoration of Contaminated Sites	6

Research Area 1: Technical Support	6

Research Area 2: Site Characterization and Remediation	6

Research Area 3: Solvent Vapor Intrusion	7

Research Area 4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks	7

Research Area 5: Contaminants of Emerging and Immediate Concern	8

Topic 2: Materials Management and Beneficial Reuse of Waste	8

Research Area 6: Landfill Management	9

Research Area 7: Material Flow and Life Cycle Analysis	9

Research Area 8: Waste Recovery and Beneficial Use of Materials	10

Topic 3: Integrated Systems Approach to Building Healthy and Resilient Communities	10

Research Area 9: Benefits from Remediation, Restoration, and Revitalization	11

Research Area 10: Cumulative Impacts and Community Resilience	12

Research Area 11: Measuring Outcomes through the Report on the Environment	12

ii | P a g e


-------
IMPLEMENTING THE STRATEGIC RESEARCH ACTION PLAN

13

CROSS-CUTTING RESEARCH PRIORITIES

13

APPENDIX 1: SUMMARY OF PROPOSED OUTPUTS MAPPED TO PROGRAM. REGIONAL. STATE. AND



TRIBAL (PRST) NEEDS

15

APPENDIX 2: DESCRIPTIONS OF PROGRAM. REGIONAL. STATE. AND TRIBAL (PRST) NEEDS

20

APPENDIX 3: OUTPUT DESCRIPTIONS

25

Topic 1: Contaminated Sites

RA SHC.l: Technical Support

RA SHC.2: Site Characterization and Remediation

RA SHC.3: Solvent Vapor Intrusion

RA SHC.4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks

RA SHC.5: Chemicals of Emerging and Immediate Concern

Topic 2: Materials Management and Beneficial Reuse of Waste

RASHC.6: Landfill Management

RA SHC.7: Material Flow and Life Cycle Analysis
RA SHC.8: Waste Recovery and Beneficial Use of Materials

Topic 3: Integrated Systems Approach to Building Healthy and Resilient Communities

RASHC.9: Benefits from Remediation, Restoration, and Revitalization

RA SHC.10: Cumulative Impacts and Community Resilience

RA SHC.ll: Measuring Outcomes through the Report on the Environment

25

25

25

26

27
27

29

29

29

30

31

31

32
34

APPENDIX 4: CROSS-CUTTING RESEARCH PRIORITIES

36

iii | P a g e


-------
List of Acronyms

ACE	Air, Climate and Energy Research Program

AOC	Area of Concern

ASTHO	Association of State and Territorial Health Officials
ASTSWMO Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials

BUILD	Brownfields Utilization, Investment and Local Development Act

C&D	Construction and Demolition

CERCLA	Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

CIC	Contaminants of Immediate Concern

CIEC	Chemicals of Immediate and Emerging Concern

COPCs	Constituents of Potential Concern

CSS	Chemical Safety for Sustainability Research Program

CWA	Clean Water Act

DBPs	Disinfection byproducts

EEIO	Environmentally-Extended Input-Output Model

EJ	Environmental Justice

EO	Executive Order

EtO	Ethylene Oxide

EPA	U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

FY	Fiscal Year

GHG	Greenhouse Gases

GIS	Geographic Information System

GLLA	Great Lakes Legacy Act

GLNPO	Great Lakes National Program Office

GLRI	Great Lakes Restoration Initiative

HERA	Health and Environmental Risk Assessment Research Program

HS	Homeland Security

LCA	Life Cycle Assessment

LEAF	Leaching Environmental Assessment Framework

LUST	Leaking Underground Storage Tanks

MIW	Mining-influenced Water

NEPA	National Environmental Policy Act

iv | Page


-------
NPL

Superfund National Priority List

OCHP

EPA's Office of Children's Health Protection

OCR

EPA's Office of Community Revitalization

OEJ

EPA's Office of Environmental Justice

OLEM

EPA's Office Land and Emergency Management

OP

EPA's Office of Policy

ORCR

EPA's Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery

ORD

EPA's Office of Research and Development

OSC

On-Scene Coordinator

OW

EPA's Office of Water

Pb

Lead (Elemental heavy metal)

PFAS

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances

PRST

Program, Regional, State and Tribal

R2R2R

Remediation to Restoration to Revitalization

RA

Research Area

RACT

Research Area Coordination Teams

RCRA

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

RESES

Regional Sustainability and Environmental Sciences Research Program

ROE

EPA's Report on the Environment

SARA

Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act

SDR

Solutions-Driven Research

SDWA

Safe Drinking Water Act

SHC

Sustainable and Healthy Communities Research Program

SMM

Sustainable Materials Management

SSWR

Safe and Sustainable Water Resources Research Program

STPC

Science and Technology Policy Council

St RAP

Strategic Research Action Plan

USEEIO

U.S. Environmentally-Extended Input-Output Model

USGS

U.S. Geological Survey

UST

Underground Storage Tanks

VI

Vapor intrusion

v | Page


-------
Definitions

Office of Research and Development (ORD): Scientific research arm of EPA that conducts leading-
edge research to inform Agency decisions and support partner needs, including state, Tribal, and
community partners.

National Research Program (NRP): ORD's overall research effort is organized around six integrated
and transdisciplinary national programs and closely aligned with the Agency's strategic goals and
cross-Agency strategies. ORD is a matrixed organization with research direction coming from its six
NRPs, each being guided by a Strategic Research Action Plan that identifies the most pressing
environmental and public health research needs with input from many internal and external partners
and stakeholders.

Strategic Research Action Plan (StRAP): A description of the overarching direction of ORD's research
in a specified timeframe and under a specific research program. Each of ORD's NRPs is guided by a
StRAP to structure and coordinate research activities. A StRAP includes a description of identified
environmental and public health challenges, research priorities, and ORD's approach to meeting the
challenges.

Topic: Overarching research focus under a NRP that encompasses Research Areas, Outputs, and
Products.

Research Area: Science area or body of research and expertise assembled to address partner needs
in the protection of human health and the environment. It encompasses problem statements, which
are delineated through Outputs. Research Areas are nested under Topics and comprise a group of
related Outputs, which comprise a group of related Products.

Output: A statement of the results to be achieved in pursuing a Research Area problem statement. It
is not a tangible deliverable but encompasses Products that are deliverables. They are designed and
developed to address specific partner needs that draw on the scientific knowledge and expertise
represented in research areas. An Output can be expressed in many ways, such as an intended
intermediate outcome, a purpose, aim, goal, or target. Outputs comprise a group of related Products
and are nested within Research Areas, which are nested within Topics.

Product: A tangible scientific or technical deliverable. It addresses the research needs of ORD and
ORD's partners. Products are nested within Outputs, which are nested within Research Areas, which
are nested within Topics.

Partner: An EPA program office, EPA region, representative of a state, or a representative of a
Tribe—often referred to as PRST—with whom we directly engage during the research planning
process. As EPA implements our research, we seek partnerships with these groups, as well as local
governments and communities, NGOs, associations, and other stakeholders, as appropriate, so our
research is applicable to and informed by real use cases.

Program, Regional, State, and Tribal (PRST) needs: A description of research needs related to human
health and the environment as identified by EPA program offices, EPA regional offices, states, and/or
Tribes.

vi | P a g e


-------
Executive Summary

ORD's Sustainable and Healthy Communities (SHC) National Research Program (NRP) conducts research
to support EPA's mission to protect human health and the environment through research activities
under three topics: 1) Advancing Remediation and Restoration of Contaminated Sites, 2) Materials
Management and Beneficial Reuse of Waste, and 3) Integrated Systems Approaches to Building Healthy
and Resilient Communities. This SHC Strategic Research Action Plan (StRAP) was developed through a
series of partner engagements on relevant key topics to address Agency and partner needs, and
feasibility of the proposed work. Across the SHC NRP, the full range of available data from public health,
environmental and social sciences, toxicology, engineering, and ecosystems research is integrated to
support Agency priorities and empower communities to make scientifically informed decisions.

SHC researchers develop, evaluate, and apply methods and approaches to anticipate and address the
scientific needs of our partners and to inform cross-cutting priorities, including cumulative impacts,
environmental justice, and climate change, as well as community resilience, children's environmental
health, and contaminants of immediate and emerging concern. SHC collaborates with communities to
develop and translate our science to inform their environmental decisions. Work with communities
looks ahead to generate the best available science to avoid unintended consequences and improve
access to clean air, water, and land for increased health and well-being where people live, learn, work,
and play.

vii | P a g e


-------
Introduction

EPA's Sustainable and Healthy Communities (SHC) National Research Program (NRP) conducts research
to support EPA's mission to protect human health and the environment. Specifically, SHC research is
designed to support partner priorities related to advancing remediation and restoration of
contaminated sites, materials management and beneficial reuse of waste, and integrated systems
approaches to building healthy and resilient communities. SHC research helps to empower communities
to make scientifically-informed decisions.

To assist the Agency in meeting its goals and objectives, SHC developed this Strategic Research Action
Plan (StRAP) for fiscal years 2023-2026 (FY23-26). The SHC StRAP is one of six of the following research
plans for each of the NRPs1 in EPA's Office of Research and Development (ORD):

•	Air, Climate, and Energy (ACE)

•	Chemical Safety for Sustainability (CSS)

•	Health and Environmental Risk Assessment (HERA)

•	Homeland Security (HS)

•	Safe and Sustainable Water Resources (SSWR)

•	Sustainable and Healthy Communities (SHC)

The StRAPs outline four-year strategies to deliver the research necessary to support EPA's overall
mission to protect human health and the environment. The StRAPs are designed to guide an ambitious
research portfolio that delivers the science and engineering solutions the Agency needs to meet its goals
now and into the future. They also inform our partners and the public of the programs' strategic
direction over the next four years. The SHC StRAP FY23-26 builds upon the previous SHC StRAP FY19-22,
and where appropriate, continues research efforts to address longer-term strategic research objectives
that bridge the four-year research planning cycles.

The strategic directions and Research Areas (RAs) identified in each StRAP serve as planning guides for
ORD's research centers to design specific research products to address the needs of EPA program and
regional offices, states, Tribes, and external partners. Partner engagement is an essential part of the
StRAP development process to identify research needs to be addressed.

Solutions-Driven Research

ORD is committed to producing research results that address real-world problems, inform
implementation of environmental regulations, and help EPA partners make timely decisions based on
sound science. This commitment includes exploring ways to improve research processes through the
application of a solutions-driven research (SDR) framework. It is a specific research approach that
emphasizes partner engagement and integration of tasks to develop research that is directly along the
path to a solution or decision. Solutions-driven research emphasizes the following:

1 The FYs 2023-2026 StRAPs for all six of ORD's NRPs are available on EPA's website:
epa.gov/research/strategic-research-action-plans-fiscal-vears-2023-2026.

1 | P a g e


-------
•	Planned partner engagement throughout the research process, starting with problem
formulation and informing all elements of research planning, implementation, dissemination,
and evaluation.

•	A focus on solutions-oriented research Outputs identified in collaboration with partners.

•	Coordination, communication, and collaboration both among ORD researchers and between
researchers and partners to develop integrated research that multiplies value to partners.

•	Cooperation with partners to apply research results to develop solutions that are feasible,
appropriate, meaningful, and effective.

ORD is applying principles of solutions-driven research broadly across its six NRPs. ORD will also monitor
how we engage with our partners and how we design and conduct our research to ensure our research
informs solutions for our partners' most pressing environmental problems. By doing this, we are
engaging in translational science, which will continually improve and increase the value of our research
for our partners. Our emphasis on translating science is exemplified by the Outputs listed in this StRAP—
they provide solutions to problems identified by our partners.

Solutions-Driven Research (SDR) Project in theSHC Research Program

Blue Carbon and Coastal Resilience: This SDR project is a collaborative effort across EPA's ORD, Office
of Water, Region 3, the Chesapeake Bay Program Office, and coastal communities in the Chesapeake
Bay region. It aims to restore, conserve, and monitor wetlands, tidal marshes, and sea grasses to
help mitigate climate change by promoting long-term carbon sequestration and to empower
communities with knowledge and tools to build resilience to future flooding, storm surge, coastline
erosion, and habitat degradation.

Program Vision

The SHC research program takes a systems approach to integrate the full range of available data from
public health, physical, natural, and social sciences, toxicology, engineering, and ecosystems research to
support communities. SHC researchers are leaders in environmental science disciplines, working with
and for communities to improve their access to clean air, water, and land for increased health and well-
being where people live, learn, work, and play. SHC works with partners to develop and translate our
research to support their environmental decision-making, and to look ahead to use the best available
science to inform their choices to avoid unintended consequences. SHC research supports and
empowers communities to make science-based decisions to improve public and environmental health
through

(1)	applying technologies and methods to expedite remediation and restoration of
contaminated sites;

(2)	enhancing approaches to materials management practices, including the beneficial
reuse or redirection of waste materials to advance waste management toward a
circular economy; and

(3)	increased understanding of linkages between the total environment (built, natural,
and social) and public and ecosystem health to support communities that are

2 | P a g e


-------
revitalizing former contaminated sites, addressing cumulative impacts (from both
chemical and nonchemical stressors), and pursuing climate resilience and
environmental justice (EJ) goals.

SHC's strategic direction for the next four years is grounded in the statutes that provide EPA the
authority and guidance to conduct research to support the cleanup and revitalization of contaminated
sites and the communities impacted by these sites. These include, but are not limited to, the following:

o Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) also
known as the Superfund and the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986
(SARA). CERCLA specifies that a research program be established within the EPA to enhance
Agency health protective activities related to contaminated sites. SARA authorizes research to
fuel the development of innovative treatment technologies.

o Brownfields Revitalization Act and the Brownfields Utilization, Investment and Local

Development (BUILD) Act. The term "Brownfield site" refers to real property, the expansion,
redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of
a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant.

o Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). RCRA is our Nation's primary law governing
the disposal of solid and hazardous waste. Congress passed RCRA on October 21, 1976, to
address the increasing problems the Nation faced from our growing volume of municipal and
industrial waste.

o Underground Storage Tanks (UST). Legislation concerning underground storage tanks (UST) is
part of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, titled the Underground Storage Tank Compliance Act of
2005.

o Great Lakes Legacy Act (GLLA) and Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI). GLLA was

authorized in 2002 and reauthorized in 2008 to clean up sediments and former industrial sites
that are impediments to community revitalization throughout the Great Lakes region. GLRI aims
to restore the beneficial uses of local ecosystems. The GLRI Action Plans have sponsored
research to facilitate the delisting of beneficial-use impairments.

In addition to these statutes, cleaning up sediment, soil, and groundwater at contaminated sites
(Superfund National Priority List, RCRA Corrective Action, Brownfield, and other hazardous waste sites)
will also improve surface water quality under the Clean Water Act (CWA). Remediating contaminated
groundwater in aquifers that are a source of drinking water is responsive to the Safe Drinking Water Act
(SDWA). SHC research on ecosystem services, contaminated sites, and groundwater also informs
decisions relevant to the Clean Air Act, CWA, SDWA, and SHC research on ecosystem services,
cumulative impacts, and EJ is relevant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

Strategic Direction

Relationship to EPA and ORD Strategic Plans

The FY 2023-2026 EPA Strategic Plan is designed to implement the Administrator's priorities for the next
four years. This Strategic Plan identifies four cross-cutting strategies and seven strategic goals with

3 | P a g e


-------
related objectives, describing how the Agency will work toward its mission to protect human health and
the environment.

ORD will develop its own Strategic Plan to respond to and build on the FY 2023-2026 EPA Strategic Plan.
ORD's Strategic Plan will align with the StRAPs for ORD's six research programs, which outline specific
research activities that address objectives of the Agency's Strategic Plan.

SHC integrates efforts with other research programs across ORD, with EPA program and regional office
partners, and with external partners to provide a research portfolio aligned around the Agency's
strategic goals and cross-cutting strategies in the Strategic Plan. Cross-Agency Strategy 1, Ensure
Scientific Integrity and Science-Based Decision Making, guides ORD's research in supporting Agency
partners in meeting their programmatic goals. SHC will assist all of EPA's program and regional offices,
as well as states and Tribes in addressing the current Administrator's priorities related to EJ, cumulative
impacts, and climate change.

The SHC StRAP is oriented primarily towards all three objectives under EPA's Goal 6 to Safeguard and
Revitalize Communities. Research conducted by SHC will provide science-based methods and evidence
to achieve this goal. SHC will assist EPA's Office of Land and Emergency Management (OLEM) in reaching
their strategic goals related to "restoring land to safe and productive use to improve communities and
protect public health." This includes addressing existing contamination as well as reducing waste and
preventing pollution. For example, SHC will develop and translate the research that is needed for OLEM
to implement the 2021 National Recycling Strategy, particularly related to understanding plastic and
food wastes using a circular economy approach. Further, SHC critical minerals research is designed to
inform Agency initiatives in support of Executive Orders (E.O. 13953 and E.O. 14017) on addressing
America's supply chain and the threat to the domestic supply chain from reliance on critical minerals
from foreign adversaries. The Program will also continue to collaborate with the Great Lakes National
Program Office (GLNPO) to advance the remediation to restoration to revitalization (R2R2R) paradigm
and examine links between human health and ecosystem services.

SHC also supports EPA Strategic Plan Objective 1.2: Accelerate Resilience and Adaptation to Climate
Change Impacts and Objective 2.2: Embed Environmental Justice and Civil Rights into EPA's Programs,
Policies, and Activities, which both relate to the recent Executive Orders on EJ and climate change. SHC
will develop research to support EPA's Office of Policy, Office of Community Revitalization in its
community revitalization and resiliency goals and the Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil
Rights in its efforts to advance cumulative impact assessment and support overburdened and
underserved communities. SHC research will also support EPA's Office of Children's Health Protection in
its goals to consider the health and well-being of children at all lifestages, which is captured in Cross-
Agency Strategy 2: Consider the Health of Children at All Lifestages and Other Vulnerable Populations.
SHC will measure its progress over the next four years through ORD's strategic measure that tracks the
annual percentage of research products that meet partner needs. In addition, ORD is collecting data
related to long-term performance goals for EJ and children's health established in the EPA Strategic Plan.

Changes from FY 19-22 StRAP

The FY 23-26 SHC StRAP will continue guiding innovative, cost-effective solutions to meet current,
emerging, and long-term contaminated site clean-up and sustainable materials management challenges.
This includes technical support as well as exploratory research that may lead to future sustainable

4 | P a g e


-------
solutions to address program, regional, state, and Tribal (PRST) needs identified during the planning
process. In addition, this strategic plan will continue to emphasize healthy and resilient communities.

Increased focus will be given to Administration priorities, such as working with communities to identify
solutions to address cumulative impacts and EJ concerns, especially those dealing with impacts from
climate change. Other areas of increased emphasis include research addressing critical minerals and
innovative strategies to reduce generation of wastes, especially pertaining to plastics and food waste,
through recycling and reuse.

There is also a concerted effort across the NRPs to coordinate our portfolios related to the six cross-
cutting research priorities, which are discussed in more detail in Appendix 4.

Partner Engagement

Development of ORD's StRAPs has been informed by ongoing and extensive engagement with EPA
program and regional offices and external (non-EPA) partners. ORD's partner engagement during
strategic research planning ensures a collaborative, transparent, and highly coordinated research
portfolio that delivers the data and information that Agency program and regional offices need, and
provides resources that help states, Tribes, local communities, and other partners. ORD relies on partner
engagement as an essential component throughout the research cycle and especially during problem
formulation to identify partner research needs and develop the research Outputs outlined in the StRAPs.

The SHC Research Program engages partners at different levels and stages throughout the research
cycle to identify and discuss their research needs. Building from engagement during StRAP FY19-22
planning and implementation, engagement methods for the SHC StRAP FY23-26 included the following:

•	Recurring dialogues and meetings with EPA program and regional offices.

•	Listening sessions with external partners, including state, Tribal, and local partners.

•	Workshops with ORD staff and EPA program and regional offices.

•	Participation in EPA state and Tribal organization meetings (e.g., Environmental Council of the
States, Tribal Science Council, Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO), the
Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials (ASTSWMO), the Tribal
Waste Response Assistance Program, and the Tribal Superfund Working Group).

The SHC Research Program will continue to engage with our EPA partners and state, Tribal, and local
organizations as we implement the research program outlined in the StRAP, support our research
products after they are delivered, and evaluate the usefulness and effectiveness of our research to help
solve environmental and public health problems.

Research Topics and Research Areas

Maintaining support for priorities identified in the SHC FY19-22 StRAP, this StRAP includes a three topic
and 11 research area structure focused on cleaning up contaminated sites, waste and materials
management, and healthy and resilient communities. Emphasis across and within these research areas
has shifted to accommodate new Administration and Agency priorities, such as those codified through
President Biden's Executive Orders on EJ, climate change, and critical minerals. SHC focus in these areas

5 | P a g e


-------
will expand capacity to address Administration priorities as well as assist EPA's contributions under the
Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act. SHC will also provide assistance for EPA's
National Recycling Strategy released in 2021, as well as a series of related, targeted strategies and goals
to support circular economies. SHC will continue to facilitate community participation in place-based
science and conduct research on high priority environmental topics such as per- and polyfluoroalkyl
substances (PFAS), lead, plastics and microplastics, food wastes, and cumulative impacts.

SHC's topics and research areas are summarized below, as well as high-level representative priorities
based on expressed PRST needs that inform the research to be completed under this StRAP. An
overview of some of the priority needs are mapped to the Outputs under each research area. More
detail on the Outputs can be found in Appendices 1 and 3.

Topic 1: Advancing Remediation and Restoration of Contaminated Sites

The objective of this topic is four-fold: 1) to provide cost-efficient, rapid, and effective technical support
and innovative methods (e.g., cumulative impact assessment, future use and potential community
benefits analyses, health impact assessments, and ecosystem services assessments) for site
characterization, cleanup, and redevelopment, especially for complex site-specific issues; 2) to
contribute to EPA program guidance and other technical support to manage contaminated groundwater
(present at 85 percent of National Priorities List sites), sediments, soils, leaking underground storage
tanks, and mine waste; 3) to provide science-based approaches so that EPA partners, states, and Tribes
can better engage in effective clean-up and restoration and reduce the burden on nearby communities,
particularly those that are overburdened and under-resourced; and 4) to provide research to advance
clean-up of PFAS, lead, and other contaminants of immediate and emerging concern. Research and
development under this topic will provide data and tools to support EPA partners, states, Tribes, and
local delegated programs under the following Research Areas.

Research Area 1: Technical Support

EPA's OLEM, ORD, and regions established the Superfund Technical Support Project (TSP) in 1987 to
provide technical assistance to decision-makers including regional Remedial Project Managers (RPMs)
and On-Scene Coordinators (OSCs). Through technical support centers and in coordination with EPA
regions, SHC will assist EPA partners, federal land management agencies, states, Tribes, and local
delegated programs with short-term, specific requests for expert consultation regarding identification,
optimization, and evaluation of waste and waste-site characterization, assessment, remediation,
monitoring, or reuse.

SHC will provide scientific and engineering expertise at contaminated sites by applying the latest
methods, approaches, and technologies for assessing, characterizing, remediating, site
redevelopment/reuse, and managing risks. SHC will recommend solutions for complex contamination
scenarios and promote robust, transparent science (Output SHC.1.1).

Research Area 2: Site Characterization and Remediation

This research area provides state-of-the-science methods, models, tools, and technologies that OLEM
uses in programmatic guidance, and that EPA decision makers use in the site cleanup process. Research
in this area will be used to support site characterization, remedial investigations, feasibility studies, and
cleanup effectiveness at contaminated sites, including sampling and monitoring strategies,

6 | P a g e


-------
determination of the nature and extent of contamination, identification of remedial action objectives,
screening of potential technologies for treatment and containment, and evaluating site reuse potential.
SHC will conduct remediation and restoration research to assist EPA partners, states, Tribes, and local
delegated programs, addressing CERCLA sites, Brownfield sites (BUILD Act), RCRA facilities, and Great
Lakes Areas of Concern.

The research will provide science-based solutions to the most challenging technical issues identified by
our partners at large-scale, complex sites. These include how to 1) more efficiently characterize and
remediate contaminated soils and sediments at Superfund and RCRA corrective action sites (Output
SHC.2.1); 2) develop and evaluate remediation alternatives for contaminated groundwater at Superfund
and mine waste sites (Outputs SHC.2.2, SHC.2.3, SHC.2.4); 3) evaluate source control technologies at
mine waste sites (Output SHC.2.5); and 4) investigate remediation, recovery, and reuse of critical
minerals from contaminated sites (Output SHC.2.6).

Research Area 3: Solvent Vapor Intrusion

Vapor intrusion (VI) is the migration of vapor-forming chemicals from a subsurface source into an
overlying building or structure via any opening or conduit. Industrial chemicals (e.g., volatile organic
chlorinated solvents) released into the subsurface may form hazardous vapors that migrate through the
vadose zone and eventually enter buildings through openings and conduits such as cracks, seams,
foundations, sump pits, utility vaults, floor drains, and sewer lines. These vapors could pose threats to
indoor air quality and cause health risks. Research Area 3 is focused on effective, cost-conscious,
reliable, and documentable means to identify, monitor, and control VI to 1) reduce exposures; 2) reduce
contaminant sources; and 3) define sampling strategies that address when, where, and how to sample.

To assist partners, research should determine ways to increase community participation to improve
equity of exposure reduction and speed the cleanups at VI sites in communities with EJ concerns
(Output SHC.3.2). Getting assistance from social science experts and developing participatory and
community science programs for these sites could improve outcomes. Protocols and guidance for the
investigation of VI at sites contaminated with PFAS need to be developed, and the physical and chemical
properties of PFAS chemicals that impact VI need to be studied (Output SHC.3.1). This information could
allow modeling of the fate and transport of PFAS in groundwater and evaluation for VI.

Research Area 4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks

An underground storage tank (UST) is a tank and any connected underground piping that has at least 10
percent of its combined volume underground. Corrosion in USTs can cause leaks that release hazardous
materials into soil and contaminate groundwater. Faulty installation or inadequate operating and
maintenance procedures also can cause USTs to release their contents into the environment. Research
Area 4 will assist partners in assessing the degradation of USTs, which will help to identify vulnerable
tanks before leaks occur. Tools to track and monitor the status of existing and abandoned USTs will
reduce the impact of leaking underground storage tanks (LUSTs) on communities.

To assist partners, SHC will develop tools and provide technical support for both the prevention and
cleanup of UST leaks (Output SHC.4.1). This research will assist in identifying vulnerabilities from UST
sites, provide information on preventing corrosion, and develop geographic information system (GIS)
tools. Support will be provided to evaluate new technologies and the effectiveness of technologies in
use in specific environments. Assistance is also needed to improve understanding of the fate and toxicity

7 | P a g e


-------
of evolving petroleum fuels and their breakdown products (SHC.4.1). Solutions are needed in preparing
for extreme weather events through assistance with triaging sites, response, and recovery. How to
identify, respond to, and mitigate UST-related impacts on communities with EJ concerns from extreme
weather events will be a focus of the research as well (Output SHC.4.2).

Research Area 5: Contaminants of Emerging and Immediate Concern

Contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) are previously unknown or unregulated chemical
contaminants that gain attention from researchers, policy makers, and the public as new information is
gained. In contrast, contaminants of immediate concern (CICs) are well-recognized chemical
contaminants (e.g., lead) known to cause human health and/or environmental impacts but, because of
their continuing threat, require continued focus and scientific advancements. The bulk of the activities in
this research area is currently focused on research and development to advance PFAS and lead clean-up
for protection of human and ecological health, especially for vulnerable groups such as children and
communities with EJ concerns. In general, the resulting research methodologies and approaches will
also be applicable to other known and unknown contaminants of emerging and immediate concern
(CEICs).

Identifying communities in the United States that have the highest risk of childhood lead exposure is a
priority for EPA and a goal of interagency lead collaborations (Output SHC.5.1). Identifying and mapping
areas with highest exposures and blood lead levels across the Nation will help to target and prioritize
lead exposure risk reduction, prevention, and mitigation efforts. Data are also needed to determine key
drivers of blood lead levels from multimedia exposures to enhance and apply multimedia exposure
modeling for regulatory determinations and for use in calculating cleanup levels at Superfund and other
contaminated sites (Output SHC.5.2). Data from these efforts will help to inform SHC and HERA
collaborations to better assess and model lead levels in communities.

SHC will develop methods to evaluate PFAS presence and characteristics in wastes, soils, and sediments
and investigate PFAS fate and transport in the environment to support the need of EPA partners, states,
Tribes, and local communities (Output SHC.5.3). Additionally, SHC will evaluate multimedia PFAS sources
and pathways for human exposure, including to children, and identify locations where exposure to PFAS
is potentially high (Output SHC.5.5). SHC will also investigate approaches, methodologies, and
technologies to treat, remove, destroy, and dispose of PFAS in environmental matrices (Output SHC.5.4).

Topic 2: Materials Management and Beneficial Reuse of Waste

The objective of this topic is an integrated approach to materials management, with the goal of
increased sustainability through reducing waste and supporting more circular economies. Sustainable
Materials Management (SMM) considers full life cycles of materials, through estimating and analyzing
materials flows; evaluating ways to reduce raw materials usage and waste generated by recycling,
redirecting, or reusing materials, such as food waste and plastics; investigating strategies to fund waste
management activities and programs sustainably, and developing tools and strategies to help states,
Tribes, and communities make decisions that lead toward sustainability. A circular economy, as defined
in the Save Our Seas 2.0 Act, refers to an economy that uses a systems-focused approach and involves
industrial processes and economic activities that are restorative or regenerative by design, enable
resources used in such processes and activities to maintain their highest value for as long as possible,
and aim for the elimination of waste through the superior design of materials, products, and systems

8 | P a g e


-------
(including business models). It is a change to the current practice in which resources are mined, made
into products, and discarded as waste. A circular economy reduces materials use, redesigns materials
and products to be less resource-intensive, and recaptures waste as a resource to manufacture new
materials and products. SHC investigates landfills to evaluate their performance; effects of landfill
moisture, temperature, and contents such as food wastes and plastics; and long-term landfill impacts on
human health and the environment, especially in the context of disproportionately affected
communities and changing climates. SHC also examines waste recovery and safe beneficial use of
materials since many existing materials, whether hazardous or non-hazardous, are intended for some
form of disposal, containment, or treatment, could potentially be reused, recycled, or reprocessed into
other resources.

Research Area 6: Landfill Management

Landfilling remains a prominent method of waste management. SHC will explore the diverse funding
methods for waste management that are developing across the United States. This will help states and
local governments understand how to restructure their funding and financial incentives in ways not tied
to increased generation of landfill waste. There is still a need to evaluate landfill performance and its
long-term impact on human health and the environment. Over the past four years, SHC has worked with
our partners to better understand performance issues in landfills and assess whether post-closure care
should be extended at hazardous and nonhazardous waste sites. Through continued research, SHC will
collaborate to develop and advance tools, processes, and methods to improve management of wastes in
municipal and hazardous waste landfills. It will also evaluate the impact of climate change on landfills.
Droughts, wildfires, and other extreme weather events projected to be exacerbated by climate change
influence landfill releases to air, land, and water, which could disproportionately impact overburdened
and under-resourced communities.

SHC will develop methodologies to improve assessment of risks associated with ending post-closure care
after 30 years (Output SHC.6.1). SHC will develop recommendations to improve bioreactor processes so
liquid additions and landfill temperatures can be optimized (Output SHC.6.2). SHC will also investigate
anticipated climate change effects on landfill waste decomposition and containment, as well as
corresponding potential disproportionate impacts on nearby overburdened and under-resourced
communities (Output SHC.6.3).

Research Area 7: Material Flow and Life Cycle Analysis

Resource conservation under RCRA focuses on reducing material use at the source and recovering and
reusing valuable materials from waste streams. This research area is designed to support the
minimization of waste generation with a focus on applying input-output materials and economic models
and databases to assess the life cycles of materials. EPA describes sustainable materials management in
its report, Sustainable Materials Management: The Road Ahead, as fulfilling human needs and
encouraging societal advancement while using fewer materials, reducing toxicants, reducing greenhouse
gases, and recovering more of the materials used. EPA has also embraced a circular economy approach
to manage waste and natural resource use. SHC will support partners by developing, advancing, and
applying input-output materials, economic models, and databases to establish baselines and measure
progress. SHC will also assess the life cycles of materials to minimize waste generation (including the
priority areas of plastics and food wastes), reduce environmental impacts, and increase circularity.

9 | P a g e


-------
SHC will build models and update and expand the U.S. Environmentally-Extended Input-Output (USEEIO)
model to support life-cycle inventories, goal measurement, and methodologies (Output SHC.7.1). To
provide national estimates of waste generation, management, and leakage for states and communities'
materials management planning, SHC will develop data, methods, and an innovative modeling
framework (Output SHC.7.2). SHC will address food waste research needs by evaluating potential
contaminants in compost and digestate and identifying opportunities for food waste reduction by
applying a life cycle/systems approach to analyze paths of food waste generation, treatment, and
disposal. SHC will use this research to develop decision-support tools for identifying promising solutions
to prevent food waste (Output SHC.7.3). Across RA7, SHC will engage and empower communities
around key issues or challenges related to materials management. To this end, SHC will conduct
research to identify and develop suitable metrics and indicators for community-scale measurement and
modeling and employ social science concepts for actionable and implementable solutions (Output
SHC.7.4).

Research Area 8: Waste Recovery and Beneficial Use of Materials

Similar to RA7, this research area is designed to support resource conservation under RCRA; however,
the focus of RA8 is on engineering approaches to recover specific materials for beneficial reuses, and to
chemically test the safety of the new uses. Many existing materials considered as waste for disposal
could potentially be reused, recycled, or reprocessed to reduce the extraction and consumption of
natural resources, decrease waste generation, and reduce the volume of materials disposed into
hazardous and non-hazardous landfills. SHC will develop innovative waste recovery and reuse tools and
processes to maximize the beneficial uses and reuses of wastes, including plastics, and to evaluate the
safety of the resulting products.

To enhance the recovery of construction and demolition (C&D) materials, SHC will identify methods,
technologies, and cost-effective practices to develop decision-support resources and tools. These will
assist C&D materials sorting, segregation, reuse, and recycling (Output SHC.8.1). SHC will develop, test,
and demonstrate methodologies and optimization tools for specific waste materials (e.g., plastics, forest
fire biochar, critical minerals from batteries) to be beneficially reused in infrastructures, technologies,
and revitalization of environmentally impacted natural resources and communities (Output SHC.8.4). To
elucidate potential leaching from materials beneficially reused, land-disposed, or remediated, SHC will
develop, demonstrate, validate, and publish analytical methods that enable more accurate and precise
source terms of partitioning (Output SHC.8.3).

Topic 3: Integrated Systems Approach to Building Healthy and Resilient
Communities

The objectives of this topic are to identify and address the impacts of contamination, remediation, and
redevelopment on the revitalization and resilience of a community. This topic builds on the research in
Topics 1 and 2 by integrating consideration of cumulative impacts (including non-chemical stressors and
ecosystem services), environmental justice, and climate change into EPA's decisions-making framework
centered on chemicals. Topic 3 will address cumulative impacts of stressors and exposures, especially in
overburdened and under-resourced communities. The goal of the research is to increase community
resilience by reducing potential risks, promoting health, and revitalizing communities and the
environment that supports them, and to increase research translation to benefit communities. The

10 | P a g e


-------
research will identify links between desirable community outcomes and health-promoting features of
the built and natural environments. It will seek to advance the science of cumulative impact analysis for
EPA and community decision making and provide solutions to foster community resilience. SHC will
develop indicators for tracking progress nationally and regionally and interpret trends to understand the
changes that occur. Research and development under this topic will provide data and tools to support
Agency and delegated programs, such as Superfund, Brownfields, Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, civil
rights, enforcement, and permitting.

Research Area 9: Benefits from Remediation, Restoration, and Revitalization

There are numerous ways the environment benefits individuals and society. The purpose of RA9 is to
continue to build the causal connections between the environment and human health and wellbeing.
The Remediation to Restoration to Revitalization (R2R2R) paradigm used by the Great Lakes National
Program Office recognizes that remediation and restoration contribute to community revitalization. SHC
embraces this paradigm. Considering community revitalization goals up front can improve the focus and
outcomes of remediation and restoration activities in Great Lakes Areas of Concern and other cleanup
programs. To maximize the R2R2R benefits for all individuals, communities need solutions that consider
the needs and capacity of diverse groups within communities, including those historically disadvantaged
and disproportionately affected by environmental harms. Emphasis on science communication and
translation is paramount to success in community-oriented research. Thus, RA9 emphasizes working
with communities and recognizing and supporting their capacity to incorporate science into decision
making, especially for communities with EJ concerns.

Approaches for assessing the effectiveness of restoration efforts have only recently been developed.
Temporal and spatial variability in existing restoration metrics is poorly characterized and difficult to
implement for short-term and longer-term assessments of ecological recovery and associated beneficial
uses. The resilience of socio-ecological systems to environmental changes, such as extreme weather
events, is also poorly characterized and needs further research. Such research will develop and refine
methods and data for managers to better project future restoration effectiveness or assess the
effectiveness of previous restoration actions (Output SHC.9.1). These redevelopment and revitalization
processes are opportunities to improve community health and wellbeing and address disproportional
burdens and injustices. Socio-economic valuations of community benefits are needed to better compare
the costs of remediation and restoration to the benefits of redevelopment and revitalization. SHC will
develop spatially explicit metrics and methods to enable decision-makers to demonstrate linkages
between remediation/restoration and socio-economic benefits from redevelopment/revitalization that
can inform efforts such as Justice40 and the Infrastructure Investments and Jobs Act (Output SHC.9.2).

There are gaps in our understanding of the connections between ecosystem condition and human
health and well-being, and what environmental interventions may yield positive impacts. To fill these
data gaps, SHC will continue to work with program and regional offices to collect, analyze, and publicly
release human health and environmental data through online applications which can be used to help
inform public health and environmental decisions. SHC will develop translational research approaches to
integrate community priorities, redevelopment goals, and human health and well-being impacts more
fully into remediation and restoration decisions (Output SHC.9.3). Community-based approaches,
including health impact assessment, will be employed for assessing the cumulative impacts of
ecosystem remediation and restoration on community redevelopment and revitalization (SHC.9.3).

11 | P a g e


-------
Research Area 10: Cumulative Impacts and Community Resilience

This research area seeks to address the cumulative impacts and risks from contamination, climate (e.g.,
natural disasters and extreme events), and other stressors on the environment and health of vulnerable
groups, such as children, the elderly, and pregnant women. To support overburdened and underserved
communities with EJ concerns, SHC will identify critical information to improve local planning;
community, state, and federal permitting; and rulemaking and enforcement. The focus is on improving
environmental equity, benefits, and resilience for both individuals and communities from the adverse
effects of climate change and exposure to both chemical and non-chemical stressors from the built,
natural, and social environments.

Partners have identified the need to characterize determinants of local environmental health risks;
assess disparities, cumulative impacts, and community resilience; and develop and implement
cumulative impact assessments and resilience and recovery plans. In RA10, SHC will identify community
assets and vulnerabilities to support cumulative impact assessments for vulnerable and disadvantaged
communities (Output SHC.10.1). Further, SHC will address partner needs to quantify the cumulative
impacts of chemical exposures, life-stage vulnerability, and stressors from the built and degraded
natural environments on existing background burdens of vulnerable groups (Output SHC.10.2). Climate
change is an added stressor on communities, especially those already burdened. Resilience is the
capacity of a social-ecological system to cope with a natural hazard event or disturbance, responding in
ways that maintain its essential structure and function, while also maintaining the capacity for
adaptation and transformation. SHC research will help stakeholders prepare for natural hazards, identify
beneficial actions, anticipate and respond to events, and evaluate the effectiveness of their actions
(Output SHC.10.3). The goal is for communities to be more resilient when adverse events occur, and to
experience greater health and well-being in the long term.

Effectively targeting interventions and resources to serve the most overburdened communities requires
an understanding of how environmental exposures interact with factors, such as aspects of the built
environment, access to or degradation of valued ecosystem services, and the social determinants that
contribute most to disproportionate impacts. Research is needed on how community capacity plays a
role in local decision making and affects environmental and health outcomes, and how EPA research,
tools, and programs can strengthen community capacity (Output SHC.10.4).

Research Area 11: Measuring Outcomes through the Report on the Environment

The Report on the Environment (ROE) is a compilation of the environmental indicators that help to
answer critical questions about current trends in human exposure and health, and ecological conditions.
Indicators are the simple measures that track the state of the environment and human health over time,
based primarily on measurements of physical or biological conditions within a clearly defined geographic
area. Indicators help to measure outcomes of environmental protection and allow for the evaluation of
trends that provide a nationwide view of progress toward EPA's mission of providing clean and safe air,
water, and land. Under RA11, the ROE will be maintained to ensure it is kept up-to-date and that new
indicators are developed to meet Agency needs (Outputs SHC.11.1 and SHC.11.2).

To ensure that ROE indicators are addressing questions of most relevance to the EPA mission, the EPA
Science and Technology Policy Council (STPC) will be consulted as an advisory committee regarding any
updates to the ROE and on the development of new indicators. New indicators will be identified in
consultation with EPA scientists and specialists, other federal and state agencies, academic experts, and

12 | P a g e


-------
non-government organizations. Understanding the cause of an observed environmental or human
health indicator trend is important to effectively evaluate performance or actions. The ROE, like many of
its underlying data sources and other EPA geospatial tools (e.g., EnviroAtlas, EJScreen), provides
numerous opportunities for further investigating and understanding relevant features and trends in
indicators. In collaboration with program offices and regions, SHC will implement ROE Extensions
including those related to EPA's Regions 2 and 3 Regional Sustainability and Environmental Sciences
Research Program (RESES) ROE development process (Output SHC.11.3).

Implementing the Strategic Research Action Plan

In collaboration with EPA program, regional, state, and Tribal partners, ORD scientists and engineers
design specific research products responsive to the Outputs outlined in the StRAPs. During the
implementation of the previous FY19-22 StRAPs, ORD piloted a successful process in which Research
Area Coordination Teams (RACTs), made up of ORD scientists and engineers, EPA program and regional
staff, and state members collaborated to determine the individual research Products responding to each
Output. ORD is continuing this process for the FY23-26 StRAPs.

Each Output in the StRAPs is reviewed by a RACT, which develops goals and objectives for the Output
and establishes criteria for the work needed to accomplish it. ORD researchers propose research
Products, which the RACT reviews and refines to ensure Products will meet the goals and objectives of
the Output and reflect the timing and specific needs of EPA program and regional, state, and Tribal
partners. RACT members serve as liaisons to their programs or organizations, which ensures that ORD's
partners are able to provide input into the proposed research Products. Products developed to address
the Outputs may take the form of assessments, reports, tools, methods, journal articles, or other
deliverables.

Throughout implementation of the StRAPs, ORD's researchers develop and deliver Products. Research to
deliver StRAP Products is implemented by staff scientists and engineers at research laboratories and
facilities in twelve locations across the country, which collectively compose ORD's four Centers and four
Offices. EPA staff are joined in this endeavor by a network of collaborators and partners within and
external to EPA. In addition to the extensive intramural research program outlined in the StRAPs, ORD's
research portfolio includes extramural research programs that complement or add special focus areas to
the overarching program.

Cross-Cutting Research Priorities

For priorities that cut across their programs, ORD's six NRPs will work together to integrate efforts,
provide a research portfolio aligned around the Agency's goals, and assist all of EPA's program and
regional offices, as well as states and Tribes. Where appropriate, the NRPs will combine efforts to
conduct research that advances the science and informs public and ecosystem health decisions and
community efforts on the following cross-cutting priorities (Appendix 4):

•	Environmental Justice

•	Climate Change

•	Cumulative Impacts

•	Community Resiliency

13 | P a g e


-------
•	Children's Environmental Health

•	Contaminants of Immediate and Emerging Concern

EPA program and regional offices and external (non-EPA) partners and stakeholders will also be engaged
for these integrated efforts. Long-term, innovative, and multi-disciplinary research is needed to make
progress on these complex issues to support a sustainable pathway towards equitable distribution of
social, economic, health, and environmental benefits.

14 | P a g e


-------
Appendix 1: Summary of Proposed Outputs Mapped to
Program, Regional, State, and Tribal (PRST) Needs

The following table lists the proposed SHC Outputs organized by Topic and Research Area and mapped
to PRST needs. It should be noted that the Outputs might change as new scientific findings emerge and
are also contingent on budget appropriations. See Appendix 2 for more detailed descriptions of the PRST
needs and Appendix 3 for detailed descriptions of Outputs.

Research Area

Output

Needs Topics

Topic 1: Contaminated Sites

SHC.l Advancing
Remediation and
Restoration of
Contaminated Sites

SHC.l.1 Superfund Technical Support
to the Program Offices, Regions,
Federal Agencies, States, and Tribes
to Characterize, Remediate, and
Manage Contaminated Sites

•	Technical Support

•	Contaminated Sites

•	Contaminants of Immediate and
Emerging Concern

SHC.2 Site

Characterization and
Remediation

SHC.2.1 Methods, Tools, and
Guidance on Remediation Options

•	Contaminated Sites

•	Contaminants of Immediate and
Emerging Concern



SHC.2.2 Methods and Approaches to
Improve Groundwater
Characterization and Heterogeneous
Contaminant Sites

•	Contaminated Sites

•	Linking Remediation and Restoration
to Community Revitalization



SHC.2.3 Remediation Approaches and
Technologies for Subsurface
Contamination

•	Contaminated sites

•	Linking Remediation and Restoration
to Community Revitalization



SHC.2.4 In Situ Treatment for Mining-
Influenced Waters

•	Mining Research

•	Contaminated Sites



SHC.2.5 Innovative Technologies to
Eliminate or Control Mining Wastes as
Sources of Water Contamination

•	Mining Research

•	Contaminated Sites

•	Environmental Justice



SHC.2.6 Technologies and Approaches
for Recovery, Remediation, and Reuse
of Critical Minerals from
Contaminated Sites

•	Critical Minerals

•	Mining Research

•	Linking Remediation and
Restoration to Community
Revitalization

15 | P a g e


-------
Research Area

Output

Needs Topics

Topic 1: Contaminated Sites

SHC.3 Solvent Vapor
Intrusion

SHC.3.1 Method Development and
Testing for Vapor Phase PFAS

•	Vapor Intrusion

•	Contaminated Sites

•	Contaminants of Immediate (PFAS,
Pb) and Emerging Concern



SHC.3.2 Soil Gas Safe Communities

•	Vapor Intrusion

•	Contaminated Sites

•	Environmental Justice

SHC.4 Leaking
Underground
Storage Tanks

SHC.4.1 Underground Storage Tanks
Site Management: Models, Metrics,
and Spatial Tools

• Leaking Underground Storage Tanks



SHC.4.2 Underground Storage Tanks
Site Management: Extreme Weather
Events and Environmental Justice

•	Leaking Underground Storage Tanks

•	Above Ground Storage Tanks

•	Climate Change

•	Environmental Justice

•	Cumulative Impacts

SHC.5 Chemicals of
Emerging and
Immediate Concern

SHC.5.1 Collaborative Science-Based
Approaches and Results to Identify
High Potential Lead (Pb) Exposure
Locations in the U.S. and Key Drivers
at those Locations

•	Contaminated Sites

•	Contaminants of Immediate (PFAS,
Pb) and Emerging Concern

•	Children's Environmental Health



SHC.5.2 Methods and Data on
Bioaccessibility and Bioavailability of
Lead in Soil and Dust

•	Contaminated Sites

•	Contaminants of Immediate (PFAS,
Pb) and Emerging Concern

•	Children's Environmental Health



SHC.5.3 Identification and
Characterization of PFAS sites and
sources

•	Contaminated Sites

•	Contaminants of Immediate (PFAS,
Pb) and Emerging Concern



SHC.5.4 Remediation and Treatment
to Manage PFAS in the Environment

•	Contaminated Sites

•	Contaminants of Immediate (PFAS,
Pb) and Emerging Concern

•	Waste and Materials Management



SHC.5.5 Methodology for Estimating
PFAS Multimedia Human Exposure to
Identify Locations of High Potential
Exposure

•	Contaminated Sites

•	Contaminants of Immediate (PFAS,
Pb) and Emerging Concern

•	Cumulative Impacts

16 | P a g e


-------
Research Area

Output

Needs Topics

Topic 2: Materials Management and Beneficial Reuse of Waste

SHC.6 Landfill
Management

SHC.6.1 Evaluate RCRA Sites
Approaching the 30-Year Post-Closure
Period

• Landfill Management

SHC.6.2 Heat and Liquids
Management at Landfills

• Landfill Management

SHC.6.3 Environmental Justice and
Climate Change Implications for
Landfills

•	Landfill Management

•	Climate Change

•	Community Capacity

•	Community Resilience

•	Environmental Justice

SHC.7 Material Flow
and Life Cycle
Analysis

SHC.7.1 USEEIO Economy-Wide Life
Cycle Models

•	Life Cycle Assessment

•	Waste and Materials Management

•	Beneficial Reuse

SHC.7.2 Data and Methods to
Advance EPA's Waste Measurements
Program

•	Waste and Materials Management

•	Community Capacity

•	Community Resilience

•	Beneficial Reuse

SHC.7.3 Opportunities for Food Waste
Reduction

•	Life Cycle Assessment

•	Waste and Materials Management

•	Community Capacity

•	Community Resilience

SHC.7.4 Tools and Methods to
Empower Community-Based
Decisions

•	Community Capacity

•	Community Resilience

•	Beneficial Reuse

•	Waste and Materials Management

•	Environmental Justice

SHC.8 Waste
Recovery and
Beneficial Use of
Materials

SHC.8.1 Enhance the Recovery and
Increase Reutilization of Construction
and Demolition Materials

•	Waste and Materials Management

•	Beneficial Reuse

•	Community Capacity

•	Community Resilience

SHC.8.2 Methods and Technologies to
Increase Reutilization of Construction
and Demolition Materials

• Merged with SHC.8.1

SHC.8.3 Potential Leaching from
Beneficial Use, Land Disposal, and
Remediation

•	Waste and Materials Management

•	Beneficial Reuse

SHC.8.4 Optimization Tools and
Methods to Beneficially Reuse Waste
Products and Materials

•	Waste and Materials Management

•	Beneficial Reuse

•	Community Resilience

17 | P a g e


-------
Research Area

Output

Needs Topics

Topic 3: Integrated Systems Approach to Building Healthy and Resilient Communities

SHC.9 Benefits from
Remediation,
Restoration, and
Revitalization

SHC.9.1 Methods and Measures for
Characterization Restoration
Effectiveness

•	Linking Remediation and
Restoration to Community
Revitalization

•	Climate Change

•	Site Redevelopment/Reuse

•	Ecosystems Services

•	Translational Science

SHC.9.2 Contribution of Site
Remediation and Restoration to
Revitalizing Communities and
Improving Weil-Being

•	Socio-economic Valuations of
Community Benefits

•	Linking Remediation and
Restoration to Community
Revitalization

•	Assessment of Eco-health
Interventions and Community
Impacts

•	Ecosystems Services

•	Climate Change

•	Community Resilience

•	Environmental Justice

•	Community Capacity

•	Cumulative Impacts

SHC.9.3 Increasing Environmental
Benefits and Community Involvement

•	Socio-economic Valuations of
Community Benefits

•	Linking Remediation and
Restoration to Community
Revitalization

•	Assessment of Eco-health
Interventions and Community
Impacts

•	Community Capacity

SHC.10 Cumulative
Impacts and
Community
Resilience

SHC.10.1 Develop, Map, and Analyze
Assets and Vulnerabilities to Support
Cumulative Impact Assessments for
Vulnerable and Disadvantaged
Communities

•	Asset and Vulnerability Mapping

•	Cumulative Impacts

•	Environmental Justice

18 | P a g e


-------
Research Area

Output

Needs Topics

Topic 3: Integrated Systems Approach to Building Healthy and Resilient Communities

SHC.10 Cumulative
Impacts and
Community
Resilience

SHC.10.2 Characterize
Interrelationships Between Chemical
and Non-chemical Stressors and Their
Impacts on Disproportionately
Impacted and Overburdened
Communities to Support Cumulative
Impact and Risk Assessments

•	Children's Environmental Health

•	Cumulative Impacts

•	Environmental Justice

SHC.10.3 Characterize and Quantify
the Cumulative Impacts of Climate
Change Related Stressors with Social,
Natural, and Built Environment Assets
and Vulnerabilities to Support
Community Decision Making for
Resilience

•	Assessment of eco-health
interventions and community
impacts

•	Community Resilience

•	Climate Change

•	Cumulative Impacts

•	Environmental Justice

SHC.10.4 Advance Methods for
Supporting Community Capacity to
Address Cumulative Impacts in
Communities with Environmental
Justice Concerns

•	Community Capacity

•	Environmental Justice

SHC.ll Measuring
Outcomes Through
the Report on the
Environment

SHC.ll.1 The Report on the
Environment (ROE)

•	Environmental and Human Health
Indicators

•	Environmental Justice

•	Climate Change

SHC.ll.2 New Nationwide Indicators

• New Indicators on Emerging Issues
and Agency Priorities

SHC.ll.3 Identify and Implement ROE
Extensions

• Analysis of Environmental and
Human Health Trends

19 | P a g e


-------
Appendix 2: Descriptions of Program, Regional, State, and Tribal
(PRST) Needs

The following describe, in more detail, the PRST needs summarized in the body of the SHC StRAP for

each Research Area and as listed in Appendix 1.

•	Analysis of Environmental and Human Health Trends: To accomplish its mission, EPA must pay
close attention to trends in the condition of the Nation's air, water, and land, and to the associated
trends in human exposure and health and ecological condition. Reliable indicators and analysis of
trends within the United States provide EPA and the public the ability to assess whether the Agency
is succeeding in its overall mission to protect human health and the environment.

•	Assessment of Eco-Health Interventions and Community Impacts: There are gaps in our
understanding of the connections between ecosystem condition and human health and well-being
and what environmental interventions may yield positive impacts. Research needs in this area relate
to the development of methodologies for incorporating the cumulative impacts of environmental
burdens and lack of services into an explicit health analysis. Solutions-driven research approaches
are needed to integrate community priorities, redevelopment goals, and human health and well-
being impacts more fully into remediation and restoration decisions, such that outcomes of
community revitalization efforts are more beneficial.

•	Asset and Vulnerability Mapping: EPA recognizes the need to protect and revitalize communities,
take action to advance environmental justice (EJ), and address the climate crisis. To support these
priorities, EPA must have a data-driven, scientifically sound foundation on which to analyze changes
in cumulative impacts for communities, including those with EJ concerns. Methods are needed to
assess built, natural, social, and economic assets and vulnerabilities in order to develop strategies
that reduce or prevent exposures, avoid or manage hazards, realize benefits, speed up recovery, and
increase overall resilience to chemical and nonchemical stressors.

•	Beneficial Reuse: Reuse of wastes and other materials is a strategy that facilitates sustainability
through supporting a circular economy. After products reach the end of their usefulness, some, or
all, of the materials that comprise them can be recycled in the manufacture of similar products or
reprocessed for use in other products or applications. Such a strategy both reduces the need to
obtain virgin materials for manufacturing new products and decreases the accumulation of
discarded, previously used materials that can be harmful to the environment and human health.

•	Children's Environmental Health: EPA's Policy on Children's Health commits to explicitly consider
early life exposures and lifelong health in all human health decisions. There is a need for research to
evaluate and consider children's environmental health information and data during development,
including topics such as soil and dust ingestion rates and asthma.

•	Climate Change: Understanding and addressing climate change impacts to human health and the
environment is an Agency priority and spans all of ORD's National Research Programs. There is a
need to continue assessments of the ecological and human health effects of contaminant exposures
from climate change and extreme events and their impact on communities, contaminated sites, and
facilities. These assessments will inform regulatory and permitting decisions, as well as climate
policy efforts, and support further climate change impact assessments.

20 | P a g e


-------
Community Capacity: EPA recognizes the need to increase the accessibility and usability of EPA tools
and resources so that communities and Tribes can apply them to address environmental problems.
There is also a need to better understand how community capacity plays a role in local decision
making to affect environmental and health outcomes. Addressing these two needs will help EPA
better support community-driven solutions to cumulative impacts for disadvantaged communities
and those with EJ concerns.

Community Resilience: There is a need to develop and implement methods to increase the
sustained ability of a community to respond to, withstand, and recover from adverse situations
while also maintaining the ability to adapt and transform in the face of these hazards.

Understanding of a community's assets and vulnerabilities and having tools to assist with resilience
planning and recovery and mitigation planning will help communities enhance their resilience. A
particular need is consideration of EJ and distributional justice to build resilience of an entire
community. SHC aims to increase community resilience by reducing potential risks and promoting
efforts to improve community health and revitalization.

Contaminants of Immediate (PFAS, Lead) and Emerging Concern (CIECs): Contaminants of
immediate (e.g., PFAS, lead) and emerging concern include chemical substances that may cause
ecological or human health impacts and are either long-term or new contaminants of increased
priority. When CIECs are discovered in environmental media, the appropriate methods for
detection, treatment, disposal, and remediation, as well as exposure and toxicological information
required to inform decision making are often lacking. Lead is of particular interest, as is the class of
PFAS chemicals, including individual, categories, and mixtures of PFAS, that are frequently being
detected in a variety of environmental media.

Contaminated Sites: Research in this area is primarily focused on developing, validating, and
demonstrating alternatives and tools to evaluate and manage risks from contaminants and sources
to ultimately protect ecological and human health including accumulation in the food chain. The
contaminant matrixes are surface water, subsurface contamination in groundwater, fractured rock,
sediments, soils, dust, air, and mined sites and materials.

Critical Minerals: Research from contaminated sites focuses on improving the recovery, remediation
and reuse of identified minerals and rare earth elements in support of EO 14017, and EPA's Federal
partners (Department of Defense, Department of Energy, and Department of the Interior-U.S.
Geological Survey). These materials exist in treated, untreated, and stockpiled sources at
contaminated sites and may have a high value for the current economy and present a potential
benefit to communities with EJ concerns.

Cumulative Impacts: Assessing cumulative impacts, the totality of exposures to combinations of
chemical and non-chemical stressors and their effects on health, well-being, and quality of life
outcomes, is an Agency priority for decision making. EPA's report, Cumulative Impacts:
Recommendations for EPA's Office of Research and Development, identifies critical research gaps
and barriers and develops and prioritizes research that will help advance the science of cumulative
impacts that will support the Agency's implementation of cumulative impact assessment. There is a
need to advance cumulative impacts research around four broad categories: 1) establishing the
decision context and partner engagement; 2) addressing scientific considerations for meeting
partner needs; 3) empowering local decisions and actions through science; and 4) supporting

21 | P a g e


-------
science translation and delivery. EPA and partners need fit-for-purpose approaches to quantify
assets, vulnerabilities, and net environmental health burden in communities for use in
environmental decision making. This includes characterizing cumulative exposures to chemical and
non-chemical stressors from the built, natural, and social environments over one's lifetime, and
evaluating environmental health and well-being disparities to identify and recommend
interventions.

Ecosystems Services: The natural environment and healthy ecosystems provide several benefits to
human health and well-being. Ecosystem services assessments will focus on strengthening the link
between ecosystem services and human well-being benefits, and on the quantification of health
impacts and their translation to socio-economic benefits and policy decisions.

Environmental and Human Health Indicators: EPA recognizes the need to further develop and
maintain environmental and human health indicators on status and trends that are scientifically
sound to support Agency decision making and to communicate to the public. Indicators need to
reflect new priorities and emerging issues—such as cumulative impacts and EJ—and observed
indicator trends should inform Agency priorities and actions.

Environmental Justice (EJ): EPA is committed to addressing environmental and health inequalities in
vulnerable populations and communities. There is a need to better understand how health
disparities can arise from unequal environmental conditions, and from inequitable social and
economic conditions, to help support decision making and empower overburdened and under-
served communities to act.

Landfill Management: A significant area of waste management is landfilling of waste, the oldest and
most common form of waste disposal. Attention will be paid to various aspects of landfill
management and the internal (including liquid content and temperature) and external (including
climate change impacts) conditions that can impact performance and effectiveness, potentially
leading to environmental and human health impacts. Landfills can be vulnerable to impacts from
climate change, so further needs include research on how landfill management can adapt to ensure
effective and efficient operation given changing conditions. Specific research examples include
impacts/risks of melting permafrost on unlined landfills in Alaskan Native Tribal lands (and
subsequent hazardous and human waste fate and transport, human health risk, and ecological risk).

Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUSTs): Leaking underground storage tanks are a major
concern for the Nation. Research and support to regulators is needed for both prevention of leaks
and cleanup of contaminated zones. Specific needs are to assist in prevention of tank corrosion and
understand the fate and toxicity of leaked petroleum fuels, especially with new additives and their
breakdown products. Understanding the impact of extreme weather events, assisting in planning for
these events, responding to impacted sites, and recovering leaked materials is critical. This research
will be especially impactful to communities with EJ concerns.

Life Cycle Assessment: An important analytical tool for sustainable materials management is life
cycle assessment, an evaluation of the environmental impacts of products and services over their
entire lifespan, applied to the consumption of goods and services. SHC is expanding life cycle-based
SMM tools for OLEM's Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery (ORCR) and integrating them
with the United States Environmentally-Extended Input-Output (USEEIO) Model. The objective of
this family of modeling tools is to provide a faster, easier, and less costly way to incorporate

22 | P a g e


-------
streamlined life cycle information into decisions for prioritizing materials and engaging in strategic,
system-level dialogue and actions with stakeholders.

Linking Remediation and Restoration to Community Revitalization: EPA, partner agencies, and
communities recognize the benefits between remediation, restoration, and revitalization. There is a
need to continue to evaluate remediation effectiveness and develop methodologies to evaluate
restoration effectiveness. Further, it is critical to assess how these activities contribute to
revitalization of adjacent communities, and how community input into the remediation and
restoration processes can improve project outcomes and overall benefits for the community.
Approaches are needed to assess the distribution of public access to beneficial natural resources.
Research should support the needs of project managers to link the environmental condition of
restored sites to short and long-term measures of human health and well-being and for state and
federal programs to understand how investments to clean up and redevelop contaminated sites will
benefit their communities.

Mining Research: There is a need for research to evaluate and identify innovative characterization,
cleanup, and reuse approaches to reduce costs, waste quantities, and energy usage in mining site
cleanups. A primary need is to evaluate innovative technologies for treating mining-influenced
waters, especially passive and semi-passive treatments. Characterization and treatment of pollution
sources—whether in-ground, stockpiled, or tailings—to reduce their impact and the number of mine
influenced waters that require long-term treatment are substantial community needs. An additional
consideration is the reuse of treated water to address water shortage needs in the western United
States.

New Indicators on Emerging Issues and Agency Priorities: Dynamic tracking capabilities for new
indicators are needed to better answer pressing or emerging issues and identify changing or new
priorities.

Restoration Effectiveness: EPA, partner agencies, states, and the private sector invest heavily in
restoration activities relevant to contaminated sites, such as within the Great Lakes Areas of
Concern. Approaches for assessing the effectiveness of restoration efforts have only recently been
developed. Assistance is needed to conduct site specific climate informed science analysis
assessments and evaluation of how well various options for adaptation measures improve remedy
protectiveness over a range of future scenarios.

Socio-economic Valuations of Community Benefits: Research is needed to better weigh the costs of
remediation, restoration, and health and environmental impacts against the benefits of
environmental improvement, site redevelopment, and community revitalization. The validity and
integrity of EJ analysis and considerations in the NEPA process need to be strengthened by more
comprehensive economic impact analyses, including positive and negative impacts on the benefits
people receive from nature. Further research is necessary to develop spatially explicit metrics,
methods, and tools to enable decision-makers to demonstrate linkages between
remediation/restoration and the value of community benefits from redevelopment/revitalization
that can inform efforts such as Justice40.

Technical Support Centers: Deliver expertise on the latest methods, approaches, and technologies
to characterize, remediate, and manage risk at contaminated sites (CERCLA, RCRA, Toxic Substances

23 | P a g e


-------
Control Act, and Brownfield sites are most common). Provide solutions as an honest broker using
published peer-reviewed science and engineering.

•	Translational Science: Research should focus on providing solutions to problems identified by
partners. The Products of the research (e.g., journal articles, reports, tools, databases, etc.) should
be conveyed in such a way so they can be readily used by partners to solve their problems.

•	Vapor Intrusion: Vapor intrusion research is designed to address a wide variety of needs. These
include the development of protocols and guidance for the investigation and monitoring of sites
contaminated with emerging compounds with a current focus on PFAS, along with the study of the
physical and chemical properties of PFAS chemicals to inform modeling of the fate and transport of
PFAS in groundwater and evaluation for vapor intrusion. Finally, development of tools (e.g., data
analysis and decision-support tools) for identifying (and ideally, predicting a few weeks in advance of
mobilization) a reasonable worst case vapor intrusion condition on a site- and building-specific basis
will be developed to assist with risk management decisions.

•	Waste and Materials Management: Sustainable waste and materials management research will
provide ways to reuse, reprocess or reclaim desired materials, derive energy from wastes, produce
less waste and better manage unavoidable waste to conserve natural resources, reduce human
health and environmental impacts, and reduce disposal costs. The overarching goal is to move
towards a circular economy.

24 | P a g e


-------
Appendix 3: Output Descriptions

The following describe, in more detail, the Sustainable and Healthy Communities (SHC) Research
Program Outputs listed in Appendix 1. Outputs are planned under each Topic and respective Research
Area (RA). It should be noted that the Outputs might change as new scientific findings emerge and are
also contingent on budget appropriations.

Topic 1: Contaminated Sites

RA SHC.l: Technical Support

Output SHC.1.1: Superfund Technical Support to the Program Offices, Regions, Federal
Agencies, States and Tribes to Characterize, Remediate, and Manage Contaminated Sites

ORD will provide and conduct technical assistance at Superfund contaminated sites for decision makers
in EPA's program and regional offices. States and Tribes working through the regions can request
assistance. These decision makers include remedial project managers, corrective action staff, and on-
scene coordinators. ORD will deliver expertise on the latest methods, approaches, and technologies to
characterize, remediate, and manage risk at contaminated sites. In addition, ORD will provide an annual
report and quarterly updates, develop issue papers, and co-sponsor workshops, webinars or state-of-
the-science informational sessions for partners and stakeholders to ensure knowledge dissemination to
the decision makers.

RA SHC.2: Site Characterization and Remediation

Output SHC.2.1: Methods, Tools, and Guidance on Remediation Options

SHC will evaluate, develop, validate, and demonstrate remediation alternatives and tools to reduce risk,
better assess sources and exposure at contaminated sites, and connect them quantitatively to ecological
and human health consequences. Planned products include 1) optimized sampling methods for
contaminants of concern; 2) methods and guidance for assessing contaminant bioavailability using
passive sampling; 3) advancements in assessment tools for forecasting residues in fish, shellfish, and
wildlife; 4) improvements for addressing temporal and spatial variability associated with contaminant
exposure; 5) bench, laboratory, and field demonstration studies to validate existing and newly
developed assessment measures and tools; and 6) filling of key data gaps on contaminants of concern at
contaminated sites, including reduced detection limits for priority contaminants.

Output SHC.2.2: Methods and Approaches to Improve Groundwater Characterization and
Remediation at Heterogeneous Contaminated Sites

Development of geochemical, geophysical, and modeling tools to support site characterization and the
design of timely and cost-efficient groundwater remediation. This can include optimizing existing tools
and designing new tools and approaches to define conceptual models at heterogeneous contaminant
sites. Research may be based on numerical modeling simulations, laboratory experimentation, or field-
based research.

Output SHC.2.3: Remediation Approaches and Technologies for Subsurface Contamination

SHC will conduct research on priority groundwater remediation topics using laboratory experiments,
computer models, or field-based research. Priority research topics include remediation of organic or

25 | P a g e


-------
inorganic contaminants in complex environments, such as fractured rock; improvement in the
effectiveness of amendment delivery and contaminant extraction systems; management of large dilute
plumes based on naturally occurring biotic or abiotic degradation; and long-term performance
evaluations for remedial treatments, especially permeable reactive barriers. Collectively, this research
will improve the selection, implementation, and operation of remediation systems at groundwater
contaminated sites.

Output SHC.2.4: In Situ Treatment for Mining-Influenced Waters (MIW)

This Output will provide information focused on remediation challenges for MIW, as well as technical
support and outreach on current, state-of-the-art passive and active treatment technologies. SHCwill
evaluate innovative technologies for treating MIW (especially in-situ treatment of groundwater) using
field-based studies and share results from these technology pilots with all interested stakeholders.

Output SHC.2.5: Innovative Technologies to Eliminate or Control Mining Wastes as Sources of
Water Contamination

This Output will develop and evaluate innovative technologies for source control. It will provide an
understanding of current technologies for coating or altering the geochemical characteristics of mining
waste materials or mined surfaces (e.g., tailings, waste rock, underground tunnels) to minimize or
eliminate generation of MIW, accompanied by technical support to evaluate use of these technologies
at Superfund sites. Additionally, this Output will explore characterization options that may improve
targeting sources to control. SHC will conduct field pilot testing of innovative source control
technologies with the EPA regional offices and share findings with all partners and stakeholders.

Output SHC.2.6: Technologies and Approaches for Recovery, Remediation, and Reuse of
Critical Minerals from Contaminated Sites

SHC will conduct research and provide technical support regarding the current needs of EPA's OLEM and
regions, federal agencies, states, and Tribes to address the recovery, remediation, and reuse of critical
minerals from contaminated sites. These minerals may exist in treated, untreated, and stockpiled
material or in mine-influenced waters (e.g., drainage from underground workings or open pit waters) at
Superfund sites and may have significant value. The research would be coordinated with other federal
agencies who are working to advance critical minerals recovery from mine waste under E.O. 14017 on
America's Supply Chain and lead to the development of innovative, cost-effective methods to capture
critical minerals while reducing their impacts to human health and the environment.

RA SHC.3: Solvent Vapor Intrusion

Output SHC.3.1: Method Development and Testing for Vapor Phase PFAS

There are multiple research needs to improve guidance and methodologies related to vapor intrusion.
One need is how to sample for vapor phase PFAS in indoor air, soil gas, sub-slab gas, and sewer gas
where the sewer gas may be entering a residence or building via conduit flow. Additionally, PFAS
physical and chemical properties are needed to allow for the improvement of exposure assessments and
to better understand their fate and transport in the environment. Research under this Output will focus
on development and testing of methods for collecting and identifying vapor phase PFAS. The results will
be shared with program and regional partners to inform risk estimates and modeling of PFAS.

26 | P a g e


-------
Output: SHC.3.2: Soil Gas Safe Communities

The academic literature (e.g., Little & Pennell, 2017) makes a strong case that the technical-science-only
approach to vapor intrusion perpetuates injustice, particularly in communities with EJ concerns, and
slows the 'completion' of the cleanup response. Research is needed to field test with communities
methods that are simple and easy to use and follow an indicators, tracers, and surrogates style
approach. This research needs to include social scientists. Communities in pilot vapor intrusion cases can
test whether this approach can reduce injustice and speed the cessation of exposures and related
community concerns and stress. Research will be conducted in conjunction with ORCR, which will have
the authority to designate soil gas safe communities. Ultimately, this Output will assist ORCR and
communities in reduction of exposure due to vapor intrusion.

RA SHC.4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks

Output SHC.4.1: Underground Storage Tanks Site Management: Models, Metrics, and Spatial
Tools

ORD will develop tools and technical support to assist EPA's regional offices and states, Tribes, and
territories to support decision making in both the prevention and cleanup areas of the UST program.

This research will assist in identifying vulnerabilities from UST sites, from preventing corrosion to
developing GIS tools and analyses to support decision making on sites and program management. ORD
and OLEM will work with the regions, states, and Tribes in developing training on these tools and
approaches to assist in prevention and site cleanups.

Output SHC.4.2: Underground Storage Tanks Site Management: Extreme Weather Events and
Environmental Justice

Extreme weather events are placing an increasing burden on the infrastructure of USTs within the U.S.
and are heightening the risk of releases. USTs are a critical part of the supply chain to provide essential
fuel supplies needed to respond and recover from disasters. SHC research will help emergency
managers to understand vulnerable and critical areas of the supply chain to reduce post-storm
bottlenecks. Extreme weather events also increase the risk of fuel leaks from USTs as well as above
ground storage tanks, which can impact the environment and drinking water supplies. This research will
directly inform solutions for addressing extreme weather events, from preparing for events to assisting
in triaging sites, response, and recovery—EJ is an integral part of this research as well.

RA SHC.5: Chemicals of Emerging and Immediate Concern

Output SHC.5.1: Collaborative Science-Based Approaches and Results to Identify High
Potential Lead (Pb) Exposure Locations in the U.S. and Key Drivers at those Locations

This Output will produce collaborative science-based approaches and apply results to identify high
potential Pb exposure locations in the U.S. and key drivers (i.e., indicators and sources) at those
locations. Collaborative engagement with EPA regional and program offices, state and federal partners,
and others to obtain data and evaluate locations identified will be critical to this Output. Results will
include geospatial data for visualizing high potential lead exposure locations and data analyses to inform
EPA and stakeholders. This Output responds to the Agency's priority for identifying U.S. communities
with the highest risk of childhood lead exposure. Identifying locations with highest potential for
children's exposures and blood lead levels will assist with targeting and prioritization for lead exposure

27 | P a g e


-------
risk reduction, prevention, and mitigation efforts. This Output links to research in RA10, which focuses
more explicitly on nonchemical stressors, cumulative impacts, and environmental justice.

Output SHC.5.2: Methods and Data on Bioaccessibility and Bioavailability of Lead in Soil and
Dust

SHC plans to provide methods and data for estimating bioavailability of lead in soil and dust and will
develop methods to estimate bioavailability of lead from soil and dust following remediation of different
soil chemistry, contaminant chemistry and biological conditions. SHC will explore tools for estimating
soil lead bioaccessibility and bioavailability and the best methodologies and approaches to obtain field
samples and data for soil and dust. The research also ties to SHC's RA2-Site Characterization and
Remediation Topic.

Output SHC.5.3: Identification and Characterization of PFAS Sites and Sources

This Output will synthesize the state of the science for PFAS sampling and analysis, and for identifying
and characterizing sources of PFAS related to contaminated soils and sediments, groundwater, landfills,
leachate, industrial facilities, and air (jointly with SSWR, ACE, and CSS). SHC will develop, evaluate, and
review sampling and analysis methods and identify and characterize PFAS in groundwater, surface
waters, soils/sediment, plants, and wildlife from sources that include contaminated sites, industrial
facilities, landfills, industrial wastes, and fire training/emergency response activities. This work will
include technical support directly and through the ORD Technical Support Centers, for requests received
from region, state, municipal, and Tribal partners.

Output SHC.5.4: Remediation and Treatment to Manage PFAS in the Environment

This Output will advance the state of the science regarding the management, control, treatment,
destruction, and removal of PFAS in groundwater, soils, aquifer materials, sediments, wastes,
wastewaters, and landfill leachates. One of the main goals of this Output is to provide data to reduce
key uncertainties related to the destruction and disposal of PFAS and PFAS-containing materials through
thermal treatment and landfilling, respectively—research needs identified in EPA's 2020 Interim
Guidance on the Destruction and Disposal of PFAS and Materials Containing PFAS. Research conducted
under this Output will inform future updates of the interim guidance, which are currently scheduled for
2023 and 2026. Another goal under this Output is to promote innovation in evaluating and managing
PFAS-containing materials (e.g., consumer and industrial waste, contaminated environmental media,
treatment residuals) through the identification of transformation residuals, effective management
practices, and technical methods. Treatment, destruction, control, and removal systems and
technologies will be evaluated for performance and cost. Fate and transport are common themes
between site characterization and remediation and a necessary area of research. Overlap between
Outputs 3 and 4 is to be expected and will be leveraged.

Output SHC.5.5: Methodology for Estimating PFAS Multimedia Human Exposure to Identify
Locations of High Potential Exposure

This Output will generate and synthesize information to understand the relative contributions of sources
and pathways of human exposure; variation of human exposure by location, demographics, and
consumer practices; and vulnerability of populations to high-level exposure. Human exposure data will
be curated from the literature, aggregated from national sources, generated in the laboratory from
available house dust and serum specimens, and collected by supplementing cohort studies. These data
will be used to estimate human exposures, understand how PFAS contribute to the cumulative burden

28 | P a g e


-------
of pollution in communities with EJ concerns, and prioritize additional data collection to support actions
that mitigate and prevent risks. This research links to cumulative impacts and EJ research in RA10.

Topic 2: Materials Management and Beneficial Reuse of Waste

RASHC.6: Landfill Management

Output SHC.6.1: Evaluate RCRA Sites Approaching the 30-Year Post Closure Period

SHC will evaluate RCRA Subtitle D sites approaching the end of the 30-year post-closure period and
provide methodology for the determination of impacts of ending post-closure care to minimize
environmental risks as sites enter periods of minimum oversight and maintenance. These methods will
inform guidance for state, Tribal, and local regulatory officials responsible for oversight of RCRA sites.

Output SHC.6.2: Heat and Liquid Management at Landfills

SHC will gather data to optimize liquids addition parameters and develop, with OLEM, recommendations
for improved bioreactor processes such as leachate collection, gas collection and control wells. SHC will
also collaborate with EPA regional offices, states, and industry to gather and analyze data from landfill
sites with elevated temperatures to evaluate the nature and causes of these changes. This analysis
includes waste incompatibility, density, pressure, overburden height, degradation dynamics, and
management strategies for these facets of operation.

Output SHC.6.3: Environmental Justice and Climate Change Implications for Landfills

This Output will focus on waste decomposition, EJ issues, and other climate related issues. It provides
opportunities to conduct targeted studies on landfill rehabilitation and more. We envision including
climate effects on landfills such as the impact/risk of melting permafrost on unlined landfills in Alaskan
native Tribal lands (and subsequent hazardous and human waste fate and transport, human health risk,
and ecological risk). There may be other types of communities/case studies disproportionately impacted
by climate effects to landfill risk from leachate or other transport pathways that are not necessarily air
emissions.

RA SHC.7: Material Flow and Life Cycle Analysis
Output SHC.7.1: USEEIO Economy-Wide Life Cycle Models

Enhancements to the current USEEIO model are critically needed to address gaps and needs expressed
by EPA program offices, states, and other users. The existing national and state models will be updated
and expanded to improve sector resolution, geographic coverage, and improve the underlying
economic, environmental, and indicator data. Expansions of the traditional EEIO model form will be
developed including waste input-output, process-based-input-output hybrid models and mixed-unit
input-output models to track materials and wastes and assess their related impacts throughout the
economy. The model will be customized and applied to fully or partially support applications including,
but not limited to, an ORCR materials dashboard, the WARM (Waste Reduction Model) tool, SMM
Prioritization tools, the Recycling Economic Information report, the EPA Recycling Strategy and Strategy
Series on Building a Circular Economy for All, consumption-based greenhouse gas inventories for states,
community sustainability web pages integrating USEEIO, and the EPA climate and materials
management report.

29 | P a g e


-------
Output SHC.7.2: Data and Methods to Advance EPA's Waste Measurements Program

EPA provides national estimates of waste generation and management to assist states and communities
with materials management planning. There is a need for a next-generation modeling framework to
produce these estimates using a variety of approaches and data sources, including state-based
measurement and economic input-output modeling. This Output includes activities to support the
development of this modeling framework in a way that maintains transparency, consistency, and
reproducibility. This work will compliment and readily integrate with the USEEIO material tracking model
being developed in Output SHC.7.1.

Output SHC.7.3: Opportunities for Food Waste Reduction

SHC will collaborate with OLEM/ORCR, EPA's regional offices, states and communities, and the food
industry to understand from a life cycle or systems perspective the generation and disposal of food
waste. This work will include better understanding the state of science concerning food waste
generation and treatment, analysis of treatment technologies, analysis of potential contaminants in
compost and digestate, development of decision-support tools for use by food waste generators and
waste handlers, and identification of promising solutions for preventing food waste. Research will be
used to inform public- and private-sector decision making, develop prevention or mitigation strategies
for contaminants, and provide research-supported solutions to federal, state, and local governments,
communities, food businesses, and others regarding how to successfully prevent food waste.

Output SHC.7.4: Tools and Methods to Empower Community-Based Decisions

While EPA develops methods and data to support materials management decisions across the U.S.,
there is a need to engage with communities to better understand how to translate this support into
actionable and implementable strategies for specific needs. Activities in this Output will focus on
projects that engage communities around key issues or challenges related to materials management.
The projects can include consideration of community-scale measurement/modeling needs, identification
of suitable metrics and indicators, and the use of social science concepts to implement policy and affect
behavior change.

RA SHC.8: Waste Recovery and Beneficial Use of Materials

Output SHC.8.1: Enhance the Recovery and Increase Reutilization of Construction and
Demolition Materials

SHC will develop methods and tools and review and apply technologies to facilitate the use, reuse, and
recycling of construction and demolition materials (C&D) materials. Although a significant amount of
C&D is recovered already, the amount that remains is large, therefore any improvements to recovery
and reutilization will reduce health and environmental impacts. It will also enhance secondary materials
markets and reduce barriers for material recovery. Research activities will be designed to quantify the
reuse and recycling of C&D materials, develop and enhance existing tools and resources to inform
segregation and storage decisions to enhance recovery, and develop and apply best and cost-effective
practices to foster recovery and reuse of building materials from deconstruction and demolition
activities.

Output SHC.8.2: Merged with Output SHC.8.1.

30 | P a g e


-------
Output SHC.8.3: Potential Leaching from Beneficial Use, Land Disposal, and Remediation

SHC will continue support to EPA/OLEM's RCRA and CERCLA programs through research to develop,
demonstrate, validate, and publish analytical methods that predict more accurate and precise source
term of partitioning of Constituents of Potential Concern (COPCs) between air, land, and water. The
Leaching Environmental Assessment Framework (LEAF) provides a standardized procedure to evaluate
different waste matrices and environmental conditions so that results across treatment technologies,
end of life processes such as land disposal, and beneficial use of industrial byproducts can be compared
in developing more effective policy decisions for waste management. Use of LEAF ensures that changing
environmental conditions be considered in evaluating leaching of COPCs for a range of waste and
materials, waste treatment options, proposed beneficial use of industrial byproducts, and other waste
streams.

Output SHC.8.4: Optimization Tools and Methods to Beneficially Reuse Waste Products and
Materials

SHC will develop, test, and demonstrate methodology and optimization tools for beneficial reuse of
waste materials in infrastructure, technologies, environmentally damaged natural resources, and
revitalization of communities. As beneficial use applications replace virgin/conventional materials with
materials typically thought of as wastes, the substitution ratios that will result in the minimal amount of
environmental, economic, and social impacts are not yet completely understood and evaluated. This
Output will include re-evaluating beneficial use of materials and waste previously evaluated for
environmental impact (e.g., plastics, forest fire biochar, critical minerals from batteries, and other
industrial materials). This research will produce scientifically tested tools and methods that can be used
to enhance beneficial use policies and practices, and potentially feed into the needs of EO 14017.

Topic 3: Integrated Systems Approach to Building Healthy and Resilient
Communities

RASHC.9: Benefits from Remediation, Restoration, and Revitalization

Output SHC.9.1: Methods and Measures for Characterizing Restoration Effectiveness

SHC will evaluate both short-term and long-term effectiveness of linked remediation and ecological
restoration actions, including potential threats from extreme weather events. SHC will consider acute
and chronic climate change effects in developing metrics and measures of restoration success. Working
with other research programs, SHC will also explore potential work with geographically located partners
(e.g., Great Lakes National Program Office, Chesapeake Bay region) to refine existing or develop new
approaches that can be used to assess restoration effectiveness and to measure changes in ecological
condition and associated beneficial uses, considering the distribution of those benefits among
populations. Working with partners and communities, SHC will evaluate and measure the impacts of EPA
and ORD efforts on building community capacity across various types of communities and decision
contexts.

Output: SHC.9.2: Contribution of Site Remediation and Restoration to Revitalizing
Communities and Improving Well-being

The goal of this Output is to identify new metrics and approaches to better promote community health
and revitalization through site remediation and ecological restoration. With a focus on the benefits side
of cumulative impacts, this research addresses the contribution that improvements in environmental

31 | P a g e


-------
quality and ecological condition make to human health and well-being and community revitalization.
Research will focus on linking ecosystem services to human well-being benefits and on the
quantification of health impacts and their translation to socio-economic benefits. Development of
approaches for evaluating the distributions of ecosystem services will allow for the identification of
inequalities in the provision of nature's benefits to inform future policy decisions. SHC will develop
metrics and indices of community revitalization that integrate ecological, socio-cultural, human health,
and economic factors. SHC will assess longer-term resilience of social and economic benefits to climate-
related stressors. This work will further the translation and applications of ecosystem services tools and
approaches in support of community-based restoration and revitalization-related decision making and
other decision contexts, such as brownfield redevelopment.

Output SHC.9.3: Increasing Health and Environmental Benefits and Community Involvement

There are gaps in our understanding of the connections between ecosystem condition and human
health and well-being and what community and environmental interventions may yield positive impacts.
Solutions-driven research approaches are needed to integrate community priorities, redevelopment
goals, and human health and well-being impacts more fully into remediation and restoration decisions,
such that outcomes of community revitalization efforts are more beneficial, and those benefits are
equitably distributed. To maximize the public benefits from site cleanup, restoration, redevelopment,
and revitalization efforts to all individuals we need solutions that consider the needs and capacities of
diverse groups within communities. These groups should include those historically discriminated against
and disproportionately affected by environmental harms. In parallel to efforts in Output SHC.9.1,
Products this Output will use comparative case study approaches to evaluate solution driven research
efforts in coordination with local communities and use health impact assessments to explore ways to
increase equity in remediation and revitalization activities. These complimentary efforts across the
research area can be further evaluated upon completion of the respective products to yield
generalizable insights into solutions driven research done across diverse communities. SHC will explore
the use of community-based approaches, such as social and health impact assessment, in concert with
population-based epidemiologic approaches, to inform community work that will be used to assess the
cumulative impacts of applied ecosystem-related interventions on community public health benefits.
Community engagement and co-development of solutions-driven research products will help refine our
understanding of community capacity and research translation to appropriately engage with
communities, including building capacity in communities with environmental-related health
interventions.

RA SHC.10: Cumulative Impacts and Community Resilience

Output SHC.10.1: Develop, Map and Analyze Assets and Vulnerabilities to support Cumulative
Impact Assessments for Vulnerable and Disadvantaged Communities

SHC will develop methods and provide data and tools derived from existing and emerging data sources
(e.g., remote sensing, GIS, monitoring, surveys, health outcomes, etc.), to help partners and
stakeholders understand their current and changing socio-ecological and physical conditions (i.e., assets
and vulnerabilities) to inform their decisions about equity, climate change, food systems, cumulative
impacts, resilience, and other issues. SHC will explore and implement ways to apply and expand
EnviroAtlas and other tools for targeted, solutions-driven, local decision making using the finest
resolution possible and practical. For example, partners will help identify high priority assets and

32 | P a g e


-------
vulnerabilities to be quantified and mapped related to their programmatic and regional needs; and new,
higher resolution data layers will be added to the EnviroAtlas to assist with targeted, local decision
making. Mapping assets and vulnerabilities is responsive to EPA Strategic Goals 1, 2, 4, 5, & 6. Resources
and training will be developed and provided to help decision-makers use the tools. Materials will also be
developed to support educational programs and other relevant activities.

Output SHC.10.2: Characterize Interrelationships Between Chemical and Non-Chemical
Stressors and Their Impacts on Disproportionately Impacted and Overburdened Communities
to Support Cumulative Impact and Risk Assessments

SHC will collaborate with EPA partners to enhance our capabilities to identify environmental disparities
to enable EPA, states, Tribes, and communities to incorporate disproportionate impacts into cumulative
impact assessments, exposure and risk assessments, and epidemiological investigations. SHC will
develop and use information, methods, approaches, and tools within a Total Environment framework to
understand how selected chemical and non-chemical stressors affect health, welfare, and well-being
outcomes for vulnerable groups and disproportionately impacted and overburdened communities. This
includes 1) understanding the myriad chemical and non-chemical stressors found in the total
environment (built, natural, social), including changing climatic conditions; 2) identifying linkages
between built and natural environmental conditions, social determinants of health, and adverse impacts
on health and well-being; 3) identifying environmental disparities to enable EPA, states, Tribes, and
communities to incorporate considerations of disproportionately-impacted groups into cumulative
impact, exposure, and risk assessments and epidemiological investigations; and 4) developing and
applying multiple methods and lines of evidence to assess cumulative impacts. Work in this Output will
inform and be informed by other Outputs in RAs 9 and 10.

Output SHC.10.3: Characterize and Quantify the Cumulative Impacts of Climate Change
Related Stressors with Social, Natural, and Built Environment Assets and Vulnerabilities to
Support Community Decision Making for Resilience

To support local, state, Tribal, and regional resilience and other planning, SHC will identify critical
information and develop approaches for communities to 1) assess their current social, natural, and built
environment assets and vulnerabilities to hazards and/or unintended releases of toxic chemicals from
contaminated sites and facilities; 2) examine how anticipated changes in climate-related stressors
interact with other social, natural, and built environment stressors, and can lead to cascading shocks to
communities; and 3) evaluate community preparedness and methods to increase resilience or improve
resilience planning. The focus is on communities that may be disproportionately impacted due to a
changing climate or proximity to contaminated sites and most vulnerable socio-demographically.
Identifying expected impacts will require using forecasts of future changes in weather and climate that
lead to chronic conditions and hazardous events. Products in the Output will consider realized and
potential impacts on communities of a changing climate and other stressors through changes to the
natural, built, and social environments; improve understanding of the links between ecological and
social resilience; improve assessment of the systemic benefits to communities of natural buffers to
climate hazards; develop methods for climate-smart adaptation that will support resilience to natural
hazards and community health and well-being; and produce recommendations for how to use and apply
data and tools to estimate and manage impacts and increase resilience.

33 | P a g e


-------
Output SHC.10.4: Advance Methods for Supporting Community Capacity to Address
Cumulative Impacts in Communities with Environmental Justice Concerns

This Output will create actionable information and resources to help EPA and others strengthen the
capacity of overburdened communities with EJ concerns to address cumulative impacts. This includes
research that: 1) investigates the nature of cumulative impacts in particular places through quantitative,
qualitative, or mixed-method approaches and uses translational approaches designed to strengthen
capacity in the most overburdened and under-resourced communities; 2) develops research
approaches, products, and ancillary activities that strengthen community capacity to address cumulative
impacts (this may include evaluating and revising existing tools and approaches or developing new
ones)—examples include community-based participatory research (CBPR), participatory science,
transdisciplinary research, co-production, communication, and training, including use of decision-
support tools; 3) explores relationships between capacity and desirable outcomes, such as improved
resilience, recovery, and revitalization, especially to develop methods for assessing 'baseline' capacity
and recommending capacity strengthening strategies; and 4) maps out existing EPA program and
regional activities that strengthen capacity and evaluates strengths and gaps in order to enhance
effectiveness and improve connections with other EPA research and activities.

RA SHC.ll: Measuring Outcomes through the Report on the Environment

Output SHC.11.1: The Report on the Environment (ROE) Program Data, Infrastructure, and
Communication

ORD, through SHC, will continue to manage the Report on the Environment (ROE), the Agency's
authoritative source on the status and trends of nationwide environmental indicators. Maintenance of
the ROE includes updating each indicator as new data become available, revising the web site to adhere
to EPA web standards, and providing overall quality control of the curated data. The current
management plan will be updated on an as-needed basis to describe how the ROE program will
continue to meet partners' needs. The plan defines the goals, scope, and outlook for the ROE program
and website. The plan also includes a communication blueprint and will explore additional outreach
opportunities informed by other Agency efforts (e.g., EnviroAtlas). As the ROE's Steering Committee, the
Science and Technology Policy Council (STPC) will provide advice on implementation of the management
plan, including coordination with the Agency's implementation of the Evidence Act.

Output SHC.11.2: New Nationwide Indicators

SHC will continue to engage with the STPC and technical workgroup members to prioritize and develop
new nationwide indicators and indicators of national importance. Proposed indicators will be vetted
with the STPC and included in the ROE following standard protocols (e.g., utility to Agency partners and
stakeholders, plan for indicator maintenance and updating, peer review).

Output SHC.11.3: Identify and Implement ROE Extensions

In response to STPC direction, SHC will identify and implement several ROE Extensions. These Extensions
1) build out trends analyses and their interpretations, 2) explore relevance of the ROE concept for
regional application by evaluating the transferability of EPA's Region 2 and 3 RESES ROE development
process, 3) use the cross-media pilot to develop a roadmap for additional cross-media issues, and 4)
explore EJ and Tribal concerns using ROE indicators and other data sources. SHC will continue to

34 | P a g e


-------
collaborate on these Extensions with program offices and regions through technical workgroups. New
priorities arising from the technical workgroups will be vetted through the STPC.

35 | P a g e


-------
Appendix 4: Cross-Cutting Research Priorities

Working together on Agency priorities that cut across the six National Research Programs (NRPs), ORD
will integrate efforts, provide a research portfolio aligned around the Agency's goals, and assist all of
EPA's program and regional offices as well as states and Tribes. Where appropriate, the NRPs will
combine efforts on cross-cutting priorities to conduct research that advances the science and informs
public and ecosystem health decisions and community efforts. Although research efforts have been
highlighted for each of these cross-cutting priorities, this does not mean that the research efforts only
support that priority; the efforts may cut across priorities.

NRPs: Air, Climate, and Energy (ACE); Chemical Safety for Sustainability (CSS); Health and Environmental
Risk Assessment (HERA); Homeland Security (HS); Sustainable and Healthy Communities (SHC); and Safe
and Sustainable Water Resources (SSWR).

Cross-Cutting Priorities:

Environmental
Justice

Community
Resiliency

ym

m p m

|L0SE||"	





1 1

Climate
Change

Cumulative
Impacts

Children's

Environmental

Health

Contaminants of
Immediate and
Emerging Concern

36 | P a g e


-------
Environmental Justice

ORD's NRPs will integrate research efforts to identify, characterize, and
solve environmental problems where they are most acute, in and with
communities that are most at risk and least resilient. Research will
strengthen the scientific foundation for actions at the Agency, state,
Tribal, local, and community levels to address environmental and health
inequalities in vulnerable populations and communities with
environmental justice and equity concerns. Coordinating research
efforts will lead to a better understanding of how health disparities can arise from unequal
environmental conditions, including impacts from climate change and exposures to pollution, and
inequitable social and economic conditions. By working across NRPs, and through partner engagement,
information, tools, and other resources will be developed that help support decision making and
empower overburdened and under-served communities to take action for revitalization.

Integrated Efforts Across National Research Programs

ACE

Understand inequities in air pollution exposures and impacts, and impacts of climate change,
accounting for social, cultural, and economic determinants that can lead to disproportionate
exposures and impacts. Develop science to support effective interventions to reduce air
pollution exposures and impacts, and adaptation and resilience measures to address climate
impacts, including excessive heat (urban heat islands), flooding, and wildfires.

CSS

Investigate factors relevant to exposures for populations experiencing disproportionate
adverse impacts from chemical exposures.

HERA

Expand the identification and consideration of information on susceptibility and differential
risk in assessments, advance the evaluation of chemical mixtures and improve cumulative risk
assessment practices to better characterize and assess health disparities.

HS

Assess and address community needs and vulnerabilities to ensure equitable incident
management during disaster response and recovery by analyzing the community-specific
cumulative impacts and the social implications of environmental cleanup; and by identifying
potential interventions.

5HC

Identify risks and impacts to vulnerable communities and groups and improve the ability of
communities to address cumulative impacts from contamination, climate (e.g., natural
disasters and extreme events), and other stressors on health and the environment.

SSWR

Help provide clean and adequate drinking water and tools for stormwater management and
urban heat island mitigation.

37 | P a g e


-------
Climate Change

Understanding and addressing climate change impacts to human health
and the environment is a critical component of ORD's research. To be
effective, climate change research must be scientifically broad and
systems-based. Where appropriate, the NRPs will integrate efforts to
avoid duplicative efforts, fill critical gaps, and provide results that reflect
the multiplicity of impacts and needs associated with climate change.
Each NRP recognizes the critical need for continued communication
with ORD partners to ensure that we are taking advantage of opportunities for collaboration,
integration, and understanding.

Integrated Efforts Across National Research Programs

ACE

Better understand and characterize air pollution and climate change and their individual and
interrelated impacts on ecosystems and public health and identify and evaluate approaches
to reduce the impacts of climate change through mitigation of climate forcing emissions,
adaptation strategies, and building resilience in communities and ecosystems. Model energy,
emissions, and environmental impacts of transformations in the nation's energy,
transportation, and building sectors, and identify approaches to increase equitable benefits
of those transformations.

CSS

Explore the use of newer analysis methods for identifying chemical contamination in
environmental media after large catastrophic environmental events, such as wildland fires.

HERA

Continue development of assessments of air pollutants to inform climate policy efforts and
leverage expertise, approaches, tools, and technologies in support of further climate change
impact assessments.

HS

Enhance capabilities and develop new information and tools to maximize relevance and
support for response and recovery from natural disasters related to climate change.

SHC

Integrated systems-approach research applicable to challenges that communities, including
those with contaminated sites, face in preparing for and recovering from the impacts of
natural disasters and climate change, ensuring that approaches are beneficial and equitable
for the communities at risk.

SSWR

Improve resiliency of water resources and infrastructure to mitigate impacts related to
climate change, including coastal acidification and hypoxia, harmful algal blooms, wildland
fires, drought and water availability, stormwater flooding and combined sewer overflows,
and urban heat islands.

38 | P a g e


-------
Cumulative impacts

Addressing the cumulative impacts of exposure to multiple chemical
and non-chemical stressors is necessary for EPA to fulfill its mission to
protect human health and the environment with the best available
science. Cumulative impacts is defined as the totality of exposures to
combinations of chemical and non-chemical stressors and their effects
on health, well-being, and quality of life outcomes.

It is the combination of these exposures and effects and any resulting
outcomes that are the focus of ORD's cumulative impacts research. The NRPs will integrate efforts to
improve understanding of cumulative impacts and develop and apply the necessary models, methods,
and tools to conduct real-world assessments of cumulative impacts that result in both adverse and
beneficial health, well-being, and quality of life effects. With this information, internal and external
partners can make informed, scientifically credible decisions to protect and promote individual,
community, and environmental health.

Integrated Efforts Across National Research Programs

ACE

Develop measurement methods and approaches to characterize ambient air quality and
deposition, and human and ecosystem exposures to chemical (including criteria pollutants
and air toxics) and non-chemical (including built environment, social, and climate-related)
stressors, and health impacts from exposure to the combination of chemical and non-
chemical stressors.

CSS

Development and application of new approach methodologies to rapidly generate exposure
and hazard information for chemicals, chemical mixtures, and emerging materials and
technologies (including safer alternatives).

HERA

Research to advance the evaluation of chemical mixtures and improve cumulative risk
assessment practices to better characterize and assess health disparities in communities with
environmental justice and equity concerns.

HS

Through a focus on resilience equity, ensure that information and tools include the multitude
of stressors impacting a community when used to support incident response. Research will
recognize that resilience to an incident is directly impacted by the cumulative impacts of the
incident and other stressors affecting a community.

SHC

Address the risks and impacts to improve the ability of EPA and communities to address
cumulative impacts from contamination, climate, and other chemical and non-chemical
stressors on health, well-being, and quality of life.

SSWR

Support human health ambient water quality criteria for chemical mixtures through research
using bioassays and risk management, and assessment for exposure to groups of regulated
and unregulated disinfection byproducts (DBPs) and opportunistic pathogens.

39 | P a g e


-------
Community Resiliency

It is critical that communities have the knowledge and resources needed
to prepare for and recover from adverse situations, such as natural
disasters, contamination incidents, and failing infrastructure. Through
combined research efforts, the NRPs will provide information and
resources that support and empower communities to make science-
based decisions to withstand, respond to, and recover from adverse
situations.

Integrated Efforts Across National Research Programs

ACE

Improve evaluations of climate change adaptation and mitigation measures and community
resiliency to extreme events in a changing climate, such as wildfire, floods, heat waves, and
drought—especially for vulnerable and disadvantaged communities experiencing
environmental injustice.

CSS

Efforts relevant to chemical safety evaluations will be leveraged with other NRP activities.

HERA

Continue to expand the portfolio of assessment products to improve understanding of
potential human health and environmental impacts of contamination incidents.

HS

Generate resources and tools for environmental cleanup, risk communication, outreach,
building relationships, and community engagement to improve equitable community
resilience for environmental contamination incidents and other disasters.

SHC

Increase resilience by reducing potential risks, promoting health, and revitalizing
communities.

SSWR

Support coastal resilience by advancing monitoring, mapping, and remote sensing and by the
economic valuation of coastal resources. Improve the performance, integrity, and resilience
of water treatment and distribution systems through research on water infrastructure and
water quality models.

40 | P a g e


-------
Children's Environmental Health

From EPA's 2021 Policy on Children's Health, "children's environmental
health refers to the effect of environmental exposure during early life:
from conception, infancy, early childhood and through adolescence
until 21 years of age." Environmental exposures that impact health can
occur before conception, and during pregnancy, infancy, childhood, and
adolescence; and include long-term effects on health, development,
and risk of disease across lifestages. Much of ORD's research is relevant
to communities, including susceptible and vulnerable populations. Where appropriate, the NRPs will
combine efforts to conduct research that will inform public health decisions, advance our scientific
understanding of early-life susceptibility to environmental stressors, and inform community efforts that
create sustainable and healthy environments protective of all lifestages.

integrated Efforts Across National Research Programs

ACE

Explore air pollution and climate health impacts within different lifestages and populations,
including overburdened groups. Assess vulnerabilities to air pollution for those with chronic
illnesses and sequelae from respiratory viruses. Research social determinants of health, and
air pollution impacts resulting from different exposure time-activity patterns.

CSS

Research will build the scientific foundation to predict adverse outcomes resulting from
chemical exposures in various biological contexts, including early lifestage susceptibility.

HERA

Continue to evaluate health effects, over the course of a lifetime, from environmental
exposure to stressors during early life (i.e., from conception to early adulthood) to inform
decision making and advance research on methods to properly characterize risks to children.

HS

Improve and develop decision-support tools and cleanup capabilities to make children less
vulnerable during response to, and recovery from, contamination incidents.

SHC

Address the risks and impacts to vulnerable communities and lifestages, including
underserved/overburdened communities, and improve the ability of communities to address
cumulative impacts from contamination, such as site clean-ups of per- and polyfluoroalkyl
substances (PFAS) and lead; climate, such as natural disasters and extreme events; and other
stressors on health and the environment.

SSWR

Help provide clean and adequate drinking water, evaluate health effects and toxicity related
to algal toxins and expanded research that will explore exposure risks for lead, DBPs, and—
through quantitative microbial risk assessment models—for high priority opportunistic
pathogens in drinking water (e.g., Mycobacterium, Pseudomonas, Naegleria fowleri).

41 | P a g e


-------
Contaminants of Immediate and Emerging Concern

Contaminants of immediate and emerging concern (CIECs) include
chemical substances that may cause ecological or human health impacts
and are either new or existing contaminants of increased priority. The
NRPs will work with EPA partners in the program and regional offices,
along with input from Agency leadership, to identify the highest priority
contaminants (broadly defined to include chemical, biological, and other
categories as appropriate), including those of immediate concern, such
as PFAS and lead, that warrant further research attention.

Integrated Efforts Across National Research Programs

ACE

Develop and evaluate measurement methods and approaches to characterize sources of air
pollutants and climate forcing pollutants, such as measurement of emissions of criteria
pollutant precursors and air toxics, including emerging concerns, such PFAS and EtO (ethylene
oxide).

CSS

Continue to develop new approach methods for CIECs with a focus on applying these, as
appropriate, for prioritization, screening, and risk assessment for decision making.

HERA

Continue and expand the portfolio of assessment products, as well as advance risk
assessment models and tools, to better characterize potential human health and
environmental impacts of new and existing contaminants.

HS

Predict the movement of chemical, biological, and radiological contaminants in the
environment resulting from environmental contamination events and develop tools and
methods for effective characterization, decontamination, and waste management.

SHC

Advance site clean-ups of PFAS and lead to protect vulnerable groups, especially children.

SSWR

Research on PFAS, including innovative drinking water and wastewater treatments, support
for future drinking water regulations, the development of aquatic life criteria, management in
water resources, and evaluation of land-applied biosolids; CIECs, lead, opportunistic
pathogens, and DBPs in drinking water; cyanobacterial metabolites other than microcystin
(e.g., anatoxin, saxitoxin, and nodularin); microplastics in sediments and surface water; and
CIECs (non-PFAS) in wastewater treatment systems and biosolids.

42 | P a g e


-------