' O '

PRO^

NONPOINT SOURCE SUCCESS STORY



VrrV't

Heminway Pond Dam Removal and Steele Brook Restoration

Waterbody Improved Through t'ie wor^ Of the Connecticut Department of Energy and

Environmental Protection (CT DEEP), the Town of Watertown and
other partners, the Heminway Pond Dam on Steele Brook in Watertown was removed. The long-
anticipated removal occurred in 2018 after almost 15 years of discussion and planning. Since 2002,
this segment of Steele Brook (Segment ID CT6912-00_02) had not supported aquatic life due to
iron precipitate, which accumulated behind the dam during warm weather and low-flow periods.
Removing the dam was anticipated to reduce or eliminate this water quality impairment, improve
aquatic habitat connectivity, and restore natural river flows in this section of Steele Brook.

Problem

Heminway Pond was created in the early to mid-1800s
when a dam was built across a section of Steele Brook
just upstream of Echo Lake Road near the center of
Watertown. The original purpose of Heminway Pond
Dam was to provide water to a local thread and string
mill. The mill no longer exists, and the dam fell into
disrepair (Figure 1).

Around 2002, CT DEEP identified this segment of
Steele Brook as not supporting habitat for fish, other
aquatic life, and wildlife. The cause of the impairment
was attributed to iron precipitate that accumulated
during hot weather and periods of low flow, presenting
itself as an orange-colored flocculation in the stream
immediately downstream of the dam (Figure 2). As a
source of the impairment, anecdotal evidence sug-
gests that adjacent land west of Steele Brook may have
been filled with bulk waste long ago. The groundwater
appears iron-rich and supports anoxic conditions
contributing to the iron precipitate conditions. The
dam impeded the passage of fish and other aquatic
life, obstructed the natural river flows, and induced
low-flow conditions downstream of the dam. These
conditions exacerbated the water quality issue and
negatively affected fish and other aquatic life.

Story Highlights

CT DEEP concluded that the best way to curtaii the
impairment was to restore naturai river flow by
removing Heminway Pond Dam. Starting in the early
2000s, the Town of Watertown began discussing the
removal of the dam with CT DEEP (then CT DEP) and
other partners, including the Siemon Company, which

Figure 1. The Heminway Pond Dam blocked the
upstream passage of aquatic life.

at that rime owned the dam and pond. In 2007, the
Town acquired the dam and the pond with the intent
to remove the dam, restore the river, and convert the
dewatered impoundment into a passive recreation
area. Removing an unused and aging dam would also
eliminate a hazard and liability. Likewise, CT DEEP was
interested in seeing the dam removed to improve
water quality and benefit fisheries by restoring stream
connectivity and improving aquatic habitat.

CT DEEP provided federal Clean Water Act Section
319 Nonpoint Source (319 NPS) grant funding to the
U.S. Department of Agriculture's Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) to develop a watershed-
based plan for Steele Brook that examined NPS
Impairments and included a dam removal feasibility
analysis. CT DEEP subsequently provided addlfionai
319 NPS grant funding to the Town of Watertown to
hire a consultant to develop a dam removal design
package and assist with permitting and preparation.


-------
Figure 2. Looking upstream at dam site,, before removal.

Fortunately, it was determined that the sediments in
the impoundment behind the dam had relatively low
contaminant levels and could be reused on site with
some protective layering or capping. Construction
activities commenced in July 2018, and most of the
major work was completed by early November 2018
(Figure 3). The Heminway Pond Dam removal and
Steele Brook channel restoration process was docu-
mented through a video: Removal of Heminway Pond
Dam & Restoration of Steele Brook.

Results

This 15-year-long project ended in 2018 with the
successful removal of Heminway Dam and the
restoration of Steele Brook channel and its natural
habitats (Figure 4). The water quality assessments in
Connecticut's 2022 Integrated Water Quality Report to
Congress indicate that aquatic life use support is still
impaired in this section of Steele Brook due to iron.
The reasons for this are not entirely clear, and further
study is required. However, flows through this stretch
of Steele Brook remain lower than anticipated after the
dam removal, which may be a contributing factor in
the current assessment.

The project helped restore the waterway's ecology.
With the dam removal and brook reconnection,
approximately 0.2 miles of Steele Brook is now once
again naturally free-flowing. Aquatic habitat was
restored, and passage was reestablished for riverine
fish and other aquatic species to travel up and down
this section of the river. The stream bottom habitat
was restored by adding boulders and cobbles, and
the streambanks were stabilized. New floodplain and

Figure 3. Looking upstream at the dam site, after removal.

Figure 4. Aerial imagery shows the Heminway Pond
Dam location, before (left) and after (right) removal.

upland wetlands were created, adjacent to the new
river channel, which further increased the area of
restored natural habitats. CT DEEP is pleased with
the work accomplished to date in Steele Brook and is
hopeful that additional coordination and support will
continue to improve water quality in the watershed.

Partners and Funding

Several partners contributed to the success of the
Heminway Pond Dam removal and the Steele Brook
restoration project from Its inception to its comple-
tion. Key partners include the Town of Watertown,
CT DEEP, NRCS, the Northwest Conservation District,
the Siemon Company, and the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. Overall, CT DEEP combined
$860,191 in 319 NPS funds, with $1.1 million from CT
DEEP's Supplemental Environmental Projects—a totai
commitment of $1.96 million—toward the dam-
removal project.

^tDSr<%

* Q '

35

%
\

% /
PRC**

2

o

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Water
Washington, DC

EPA 841-F-22-001JJ
December 2022

For additional information contact:

CT DEEP Watershed Section

CT Department of Energy and Environmental Protection
DEEP.Watershed@ct.gov


-------