II Baiteiie

. . . Putting Technology To Work

Environmental Technology
Verification Program

Advanced Monitoring
Systems Center

Test/QA Plan for
Verification of
Test Kits for Detection of
Atrazine in Water

ElVEFtf


-------
TEST/QA PLAN

for

VERIFICATION OF
TEST KITS FOR DETECTION OF
ATRAZINE IN WATER

September 15,2003

Prepared by

Battelle

505 King Avenue
Columbus, OH 43201-2693


-------
Table of Contents

Page

1.0 Introduction	1

1.2	Test Objective	1

1.3	Organization and Responsibility	2

1.3.1	Battelle	2

1.3.2	Partner Organizations	6

1.3.3	Vendors	6

1.3.4	EPA	7

1.3.5	Subcontract Laboratory	8

2.0 Verification Approach	9

2.1	Scope of Testing	9

2.2	Experimental Design	10

2.3	Test Samples	11

2.3.1	QC Samples	11

2.3.2	PT Samples	12

2.3.3	Environmental Samples	14

2.4	Reference Method	15

3.0 Materials and Equipment	16

3.1	Field Supplies	16

3.2	Laboratory Supplies	16

4.0 Procedures	19

4.1	Environmental Sample Collection and Storage	19

4.2	Equipment Calibration	19

4.3	Test Sample Preparation and Storage	21

4.3.1	Physico-chemical Characterization	21

4.3.2	Sample Preparation	21

4.4	Sample Identification	22

4.5	Sample Analysis	22

4.5.1	Test Kits	22

4.5.2	Reference Method	23

4.6	Schedule	23

5.0 Data Handling and Reporting	25

5.1	Data Acquisition and Review	25

5.2	Data Analysis	27

5.2.1	Accuracy	27

5.2.2	Precision	27

5.2.3	Linearity	28

5.2.4	Method Detection Limit	28


-------
29

29

29

30

31

31

31

31

32

32

33

34

34

36

5.2.5	Matrix Interferences	

5.2.6	False Positives/False Negatives

5.2.7	False Positives/False Negatives
Reporting	

Quality Assurance /Quality Control	

Sample Chain-of-Custody Procedures	

Audits	

6.2.1	Technical Systems Audit	

6.2.2	Data Quality Audit	

6.2.3	Performance Evaluation Audit..

Reference Method QC	

QA/QC Reporting	

Corrective Action	

References


-------
LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. Sample Summary for Verification of Test Kits for Atrazine in Water	13

Table 2. Calibration Procedures for Sample Preparation and Physico-chemical

Characterization	20

Table 3. Approximate Schedule of Verification Test Days	24

Table 4. Summary of Data Recording Process for the Verification Test	26

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Organization Chart for the Verification Test	3


-------
ETV Advanced Monitoring Systems Center

Test/QA Plan for Verification of Test Kits for Atrazine in Water

Version 1.0
September 15, 2003

APPROVAL:

Name	

Company	

Date	


-------
DISTRIBUTION LIST

Elizabeth A. Betz

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
National Exposure Research Laboratory
MD-44

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Robert Fuerst

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
National Exposure Research Laboratory
Mail Drop D-205-05
4930 Old Page Road
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Elin Ulrich

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
National Exposure Research Laboratory
Mail Drop D-205-05
4930 Old Page Road
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

James Brady
Syngenta Crop Protection
410 Swing Road
Greensboro, NC 27419

Brian Skoczenski
Beacon Analytical
383 Presumpscot St.

Portland, ME 04103

Fernando Rubio
Abraxis

54 Steamwhistle Drive
Warminster, PA 18974

Tom Round
Silver Lake Research
911 S. Primrose Ave.

Monrovia, CA 91016

Bob Ferguson
Strategic Diagnostics Inc.

Ill Pencader Drive
Newark DE 19702

Kenneth Wood
Senior Consultant
DuPont Corporate Environmental
Engineering Group
Brandy wine Building 9212
Wilmington, DE 19898

Marty Link
Groundwater Section
Nebraska Dept. of Environmental
Quality

1200 N St., Suite 400
P.O. Box 98922
Lincoln, NE 68509-8922

Elizabeth Flynt

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Chemistry Laboratory
Bldg. 1105, RoomD416
Stennis Space Center, MS 39529

Geoff Scott

In Care of: Paul Pennington
NOAA/National Ocean Service
219 Fort Johnson Road
Charleston, SC 29412-9110

Craig Adams

University of Missouri - Rolla

Department of Civil, Architectural & Environmental

Engineering

Rolla, MO 65409

Joe Peters
Alan Cherepon

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Building MC-147
12100 Park 35 Circle
Austin, TX 78753

Karen Riggs
Amy Dindal
Zachary Willenberg
Battelle
505 King Ave.

Columbus, OH 43201

Patricia White
Bo Liu
Rosanna Buhl
Battelle

397 Washington St.

Duxbury, MA 02332


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 1 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

1.0	Introduction

1.1	Test Description

This test/quality assurance (QA) plan provides procedures for a performance verification
test of test kits for the analysis of atrazine in water. The verification test will be conducted under
the auspices of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through the Environmental
Technology Verification (ETV) Program. The purpose of ETV is to provide objective and
quality-assured performance data on environmental technologies so that users, developers,
regulators, and consultants can make informed decisions about purchasing and applying these
technologies.

The verification test will be performed by Battelle, which is managing the ETV Advanced
Monitoring Systems (AMS) Center through a cooperative agreement with EPA. The scope of the
AMS Center covers verification of monitoring technologies for contaminants and natural species
in air, water, and soil. In performing the verification test, Battelle will follow the procedures
specified in this test/QA plan and will comply with the data quality requirements in the "Quality
Management Plan for the ETV Advanced Monitoring Systems Center" (AMS Center QMP).1

1.2 Test Objective

The verification of test kits for the detection of atrazine in water will be conducted to
determine the analytical and operational performance characteristics of these technologies.

These technologies are typically based on immunoassay methods, where specific antibodies are
used to detect and measure the analytes of interest. Immunoassay-based test kits utilize a
competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), where atrazine in the sample
competes with enzyme-labeled atrazine for a limited number of antibody binding sites specific to
atrazine. After an incubation period, a magnetic field may be used to separate the bound and
unbound atrazine. A simple wash step is typically followed by a color development step. The


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 2 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

sample concentration is inversely proportional to color development, with a darker color
indicating a lower sample concentration and a lighter color indicating a higher concentration.

A variety of quality control (QC), performance test, and environmental water samples
will be analyzed to assess the capabilities of the test kits relative to an accepted reference
laboratory method.

1.3 Organization and Responsibility

The verification test will be performed by Battelle with the assistance of the following
partner organizations: National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean
Service (NOAA/NOS), Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), EPA's
Environmental Chemistry Laboratory at the Stennis Space Center (Stennis, Mississippi), and the
University of Missouri - Rolla. The testing will occur at Battelle's Duxbury, Massachusetts
laboratory. The organizational chart provided in Figure 1 identifies the responsibilities of the
organizations and individuals associated with the verification test. Roles and responsibilities are
defined further below.

1.3.1 Battelle

Ms. Patricia White is the AMS Center Verification Test Coordinator. In this role, Ms.
White will have overall responsibility for ensuring that the technical, schedule, and cost goals
established for the verification test are met. Specifically, Ms. White will:

•	Assemble a team of qualified technical staff to conduct the verification test.

•	Direct the team in performing the verification test in accordance with the test/QA plan.

•	Ensure that all quality procedures specified in the test/QA plan and in the AMS Center
QMP are followed.


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 3 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

Figure 1. Organization Chart for the Verification Test


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 4 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

•	Prepare the draft and final test/QA plan, verification reports, and verification statements.

•	Revise the draft test/QA plan, verification reports, and verification statements in response
to reviewers' comments.

•	Respond to any issues raised in assessment reports and audits, including instituting
corrective action as necessary.

•	Serve as the primary point of contact for vendor representatives.

•	Coordinate distribution of the final test/QA plan, verification reports and statements.

•	Establish a budget for the verification test and monitor staff effort to ensure that budget is
not exceeded.

•	Ensure that confidentiality of vendor information is maintained.

Ms. Amy Dindal is a Verification Testing Leader for the AMS Center. Ms. Dindal will
provide technical guidance and oversee the various stages of verification testing. She will:

•	Support Ms. White in preparing the test/QA plan and organizing the testing.

•	Review the draft and final test/QA plan.

•	Review the draft and final verification reports and verification statements.

Ms. Karen Riggs is Battelle's manager for the AMS Center. Ms. Riggs will:

•	Review the draft and final test/QA plan.

•	Review the draft and final verification reports and verification statements.

•	Ensure that necessary Battelle resources, including staff and facilities, are committed to
the verification test.

•	Ensure that vendor confidentiality is maintained.


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 5 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

•	Support Ms. White in responding to any issues raised in assessment reports and audits.

•	Maintain communication with EPA's technical and quality managers.

Battelle Technical Staff will conduct the testing of the atrazine test kits during the
verification test. The responsibilities of the technical staff include:

•	Assist in the collection, receipt, and storage of environmental samples.

•	Filter environmental water samples, as required.

•	Measure physico-chemical parameters on environmental water samples prior to
preparation of atrazine-fortified samples.

•	Prepare the atrazine spiking solution and fortify the test samples as required.

•	Split and ship water samples to the reference laboratory for measurement of atrazine, and
to the subcontract laboratory for analysis of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) as part of
the physico-chemical characterization.

•	Perform test kit analyses, as required.

Mr. Zachary Willenberg is Battelle's Quality Manager for the AMS Center. Mr.
Willenberg will:

•	Review the draft and final test/QA plan.

•	Conduct a technical systems audit once during the verification test, or designate another
QA Manager to conduct the audit.

•	Audit at least 10% of the verification data.

•	Prepare and distribute an assessment report for each audit.

•	Verify implementation of any necessary corrective action.


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 6 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

•	Issue a stop work order if self audits indicate that data quality is being compromised;
notify Battelle's AMS Center Manager if a stop work order is issued.

•	Provide a summary of the QA/QC activities and results for the verification reports.

•	Review the draft and final verification reports and verification statements.

•	Assume overall responsibility for ensuring that the test/QA plan is followed.

1.3.2	Partner Organizations

The responsibilities of the partner organizations supporting the verification test are as
follows:

•	Review the draft test/QA plan.

•	Technical staff from NOAA/NOS and the University of Missouri - Rolla will assist in the
collection of environmental water samples for analysis in the test and ship them to
Battelle.

•	Technical staff from TCEQ will analyze test samples using the atrazine test kits at
Battelle.

•	The EPA Environmental Chemistry Laboratory at the Stennis Space Center will provide
reference laboratory analyses for atrazine in water.

1.3.3	Vendors

The responsibilities of the vendor representatives are as follows:

•	Review the draft test/QA plan.

•	Approve the test/QA plan prior to test initiation.

•	Provide off-the-shelf test kits for analysis of all verification test samples.

• Provide all other equipment needed to complete the immunoassay analyses, including a
spectrophotometer.


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 7 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

•	If desired, provide training to Battelle and TCEQ personnel on operating the test kits and
associated equipment prior to testing.

•	Review the draft verification report and statement.

1.3.4 EPA

EPA's responsibilities in the AMS Center are based on the requirements stated in the
"Environmental Technology Verification Program Quality Management Plan" (EPA QMP).2
The roles of the specific EPA staff are as follows:

Ms. Elizabeth Betz is EPA's AMS Center Quality Manager. For the verification test, Ms.
Betz will:

•	Review the draft test/QA plan.

•	Perform at her option one external technical system audit during the verification test.

•	Notify the EPA AMS Center Manager of the need for a stop work order if external audit
indicates that data quality is being compromised.

•	Prepare and distribute an assessment report summarizing results of external audit.

•	Review draft verification reports and statements.

Mr. Robert Fuerst is EPA's manager for the EPA AMS Center. Mr. Fuerst will:

•	Review the draft test/QA plan.

•	Approve the final test/QA plan.

•	Review the draft verification reports and statements.

•	Oversee the EPA review process of the verification reports and statements.


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 8 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

• Coordinate the submission of verification reports and statements for final EPA approval.

1.3.5 Subcontract Laboratory

A subcontract laboratory, Severn-Trent Laboratories (STL) in Burlington, Vermont will
be utilized to analyze DOC in environmental samples as part of the physico-chemical
characterization. Mr. Kirk Young is STL's project manager. For the verification test, Mr. Young
will provide QA-reviewed DOC results as requested for water samples.


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 9 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

2.0 Verification Approach

2.1 Scope of Testing

This test/QA plan specifically addresses verification of immunoassay test kits that
provide qualitative, semi-quantitative, or quantitative measurements of atrazine in water. Test
kits that provide qualitative results only indicate the presence or absence of the target analyte
relative to a regulatory or health-based concentration level. Test kit methods that provide semi-
quantitative results determine the presence or absence of the analyte within a specified
concentration interval. Quantitative results can be obtained using test kits that generate a
calibration curve using a range of analyte concentrations. The vendor will specify the type of the
measurement provided by the test kit to be verified.

Qualitative test kits are designed to be operated by non-technical users. Semi-quantitative
and quantitative immunoassay test kits will yield more consistent and reliable results when
operated by an experienced user. In this verification test, an analyst with previous experience in
using immunoassay test kits will analyze all test samples to minimize the error introduced by
operator inexperience.

Test kits that are specific for atrazine are typically cross-reactive for a variety of triazine
analogues, some of which are degradation products of atrazine. Cross-reactivity information is
typically provided in the test kit documentation. It is assumed that most users of these kits will
perform laboratory analysis of samples that provide a positive immunoassay response to confirm
the presence and concentration of atrazine in the sample (i.e., the test kits will be used primarily
as a screen for the possible presence of atrazine). As such, this test will not verify all vendor-
provided information on cross-reactivity; however, the effect of two cross-reactive atrazine
degradation products (hydroxyatrazine and desethyl atrazine) on test kit performance will be
verified. It is assumed that most users of these kits will perform laboratory analysis of samples
that provide a positive immunoassay response to confirm the presence and concentration of
atrazine in the sample (i.e., the test kits will be used primarily as a screen for the possible
presence of atrazine).


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 10 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

Natural and atrazine-fortified water samples will be analyzed using both the
immunoassay test kits and an appropriate reference method. A variety of sample matrices will be
tested: ASTM Type I water, fresh pond water, brackish pond water, shallow (i.e., alluvial)
groundwater, and chlorinated drinking water. These matrices are examples of water types that
are typically monitored using immunoassay test kits to give a sense of the performance using a
variety of matrices. However, this is not intended to be an exhaustive study nor to represent all
possible water types that could be tested.

The performance of each test kit will be evaluated quantitatively by comparing the test kit
and reference method results. Each test kit also will be qualitatively evaluated for ease of use,
cost, and sample throughput. The test kits will be evaluated for the following parameters:

•	accuracy

•	precision

•	linearity

•	method detection limit

•	cross reactivity of hydroxyatrazine and desethyl atrazine

•	matrix interference effects, and

•	occurrence of false positive and false negative results.

Qualitative technologies will not be evaluated for linearity or method detection limit
because they only provide a positive or negative result relative to a specified concentration level.
The experimental design is described further below.

2.2 Experimental Design

The verification will involve challenging each test kit with a variety of water samples that
are intended to represent those typically monitored using the test kits. Sample matrices will
include fresh pond water, brackish pond water, alluvial groundwater, and chlorinated drinking
water. Natural and atrazine-fortified (i.e., unspiked and spiked) samples of each matrix will be


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 11 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

analyzed. ASTM Type I water samples fortified with atrazine or an atrazine degradation product
also will be analyzed. Physico-chemical parameters (pH, temperature, salinity, conductivity,
alkalinity, and DOC) will be measured in environmental samples to provide supporting
characterization data.

All samples will be analyzed by each test kit and by the reference method. Each sample
will be analyzed in triplicate with each test kit. Samples will be given to the analyst blind and in
random order.

Test kit and reference method results will be used to assess test kit accuracy and linearity.
Replicate sample results will be used to assess test kit precision. Results for replicates of a low-
level spiked sample will be used to evaluate the method detection limit. Cross-reactivity of
hydroxyatrazine and desethyl atrazine will be assessed by evaluating the test kit results for
samples that contain only the degradation compound, but not atrazine. Potential matrix effects
will be assessed by comparing accuracy and precision results for environmental samples (i.e.,
chlorinated drinking water, fresh surface water, brackish surface water and groundwater) to those
for ASTM Type I water samples. Performance parameters, such as ease of use and reliability,
will be based on documented observations of the analyst. Sample throughput will be estimated
based on the time required to analyze a sample set.

2.3 Test Samples

Test samples to be used in this verification test will include QC samples, performance test
(PT) samples, and environmental water samples. Table 1 lists the number and type of each
sample to be analyzed in the verification test. Each type of test sample is described further
below.

2.3.1 QC Samples

QC samples will include reagent blank (RB) and calibration check samples. The RB
samples will be prepared from ASTM Type I water and will be exposed to identical sample


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 12 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

preparation and analysis procedures as the test samples, including the addition of all reagents.
These samples will be used to help ensure that no sources of contamination are introduced in the
sample handling and analysis procedures. At least 10% of the test samples will be RB samples.

Calibration check samples may be used to verify that the test kits are properly calibrated
and reading within defined control limits. Calibration check samples will be analyzed in
accordance with the vendor-provided test kit protocol using standards or calibration check
samples supplied by the vendor.

2.3.2 PT Samples

PT sample types are listed in Table 1. The first type of PT sample consists of ASTM
Type I water spiked at five different atrazine concentration levels. The PT sample concentrations
will span the calibration range of the immunoassay test kits. This range includes the EPA
maximum contaminant level (MCL) for atrazine in drinking water, which is 3 parts per billion
[ppb]3. Three replicates of each PT sample will be analyzed using the test kits.

The second type of PT sample is a low-level atrazine fortified sample. Seven replicates
of this sample will be analyzed for the method detection limit determination. This sample will be
spiked at a level of two times the vendor-stated test kit detection limit.

The third type of PT sample is a cross-reactivity check sample. Two samples will consist
of ASTM Type I water spiked with two different cross-reactive atrazine degradation products
(hydroxyatrazine and desethyl atrazine) at a level of 3 ppb. Three replicates of each cross-
reactivity check sample will be analyzed using the test kits. One replicate will be analyzed by the
reference method to confirm the absence of atrazine in the samples.

All PT samples will be prepared in the Battelle laboratory using a certified,
commercially-available standards. PT sample results will be used to assess test kit accuracy,
precision, linearity, method detection limit, cross-reactivity, and occurrence of false positive and
false negative results using the data analysis methods described in Section 5.2.


-------
Table 1. Sample Summary for Verification of Test Kits for Atrazine in Water







Total No.







Replicates
for test kit

laboratory
reference



Type of sample

Description

analysis

analyses

Performance Factor1

Quality Control

Reagent blanks (10%)

minimum 10% frequency

20

1

False positive/negative

Calibration check samples

As required by the test kit protocol

TBD



-

Performance Test

Performance test #1

0.1 ppb atrazine

3

1



Performance test #2

0.5 ppb atrazine

3

1

Accuracy, precision,

Performance test #3

1 ppb atrazine

3

1

linearity, false

Performance test #4

3 ppb atrazine

3

1

positive/negative

Performance test #5

5 ppb atrazine

3

1



Method detection limit

Atrazine concentration 2X vendor-stated detection limit

7



Method detection limit

Cross-reactivity test #1

3 ppb hydroxyatrazine

3

1

Cross-reactivity, false

Cross-reactivity test #2

3 ppb desethyl atrazine

3

1

positive/negative

Environmental

Fresh water

Fresh surface water, unspiked

3

1



Fresh water spike #1

Fresh surface water with 1 ppb atrazine spike

3

1



Fresh water spike #2

Fresh surface water with 3 ppb atrazine spike

3

1













Brackish water

Brackish water, unspiked

3

1



Brackish water spike #1

Brackish water with 1 ppb atrazine spike

3

1



Brackish water spike #2

Brackish water with 3 ppb atrazine spike

3

1

Accuracy, precision, matrix









effects, false

Groundwater

Groundwater, unspiked

3

1

positive/negative

Groundwater spike #1

Groundwater with 1 ppb atrazine spike

3

1



Groundwater spike #2

Groundwater with 3 ppb atrazine spike

3

1













Treated drinking water

Chlorinated drinking water

3

1



Treated drinking water spike #1

Chlorinated drinking water with 1 ppb spike

3

1



Treated drinking water spike #2

Chlorinated drinking water with 3 ppb atrazine spike

3

1



Performance Evaluation Sample



-

1

-

Total



84

21

-

1 Other performance factors to be evaluated qualitatively include ease of use and reliability.


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 14 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

2.3.3 Environmental Samples

Environmental samples will be collected from a variety of sources to evaluate the
performance of the test kits with various sample matrices. Samples will be collected from the
following sources:

•	Fresh surface water from a South Carolina pond

•	Brackish surface water from a South Carolina pond

•	Groundwater from an alluvial aquifer in the Midwest

•	Chlorinated drinking water from the Battelle laboratory.

Some test kit protocols recommend filtration for removal of gross particulate matter prior
to sample analysis. Therefore, the fresh and brackish pond water samples will be filtered with a
0.45 pm filter in the laboratory prior to sample spiking/preparation and analysis. After filtration,
the following physico-chemical parameters will be measured in each environmental water sample
to characterize the sample matrix: pH, temperature, salinity, conductivity, and alkalinity. An
aliquot of each environmental sample will be collected and sent to the subcontract laboratory for
DOC analysis. The physico-chemical parameters will be measured in the laboratory instead of in
the field to provide information about the sample matrix immediately prior to test kit analysis.

As shown in Table 1, each environmental water sample also will be fortified with atrazine
at two spike levels. The fortified samples will be spiked in the Battelle laboratory to increase the
analyte concentration by the amount shown in Table 1. The spike solution will be prepared in the
laboratory from a certified, commercially-available atrazine standard. Three replicates of each
sample will be analyzed. The data for the environmental samples will be used to assess accuracy,
precision, potential matrix effects, and occurrence of false positives and false negatives following
the data analysis procedures provided in Section 5.2.


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 15 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

2.4 Reference Method

The laboratory reference method to be used for this verification test is an EPA standard
method for the analysis of drinking water. Each sample will be analyzed using gas
chromatography / mass spectrometry (GC/MS) according to EPA Method 525.24.


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 16 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

3.0 Materials and Equipment

In general, this verification test will rely on test kit materials and equipment provided by
the vendors. Battelle will provide the following equipment and materials for the collection,
preparation, storage, and shipment of test samples.

3.1 Field Supplies

The following supplies will be needed for the collection of field samples:

•	1-L or 2-L certified clean amber glass bottles fitted with polytetrafluoroethylene
(TFE)-lined screw caps

•	Solvent-rinsed foil to keep bottle caps contaminant-free during sampling

•	Disposable latex gloves

•	Sample labels

•	Clear packing tape (to affix the sample label to bottle and seal the cooler for sample
shipment)

•	Chain-of-custody forms

•	Bubble wrap to prevent sample breakage

•	Coolers and blue ice packs for sample storage and shipping

•	Address labels for the coolers.

3.2 Laboratory Supplies

The following laboratory supplies will be needed for the preparation of the PT and
laboratory-fortified environmental samples and sample shipment. Vendors will provide all
equipment needed to perform the immunoassay test kit analyses.


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 17 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

•	ASTM Type I water

•	Class A volumetric flask

•	10-|aL to 500-|iL adjustable pipette and disposable tips

•	Repeating pipette and disposable tips (volume appropriate for each test kit)

•	Certified, commercially-available atrazine, hydroxyatrazine and desethyl atrazine
standards

•	Performance evaluation (PE) atrazine standard

•	Dichloromethane, acetone, and/or methanol, as applicable (pesticide-grade or equivalent)

•	Glass vials fitted with TFE-lined screw caps for test kit aliquots

•	Pre-cleaned glass container of sufficient size to prepare atrazine-fortified samples

•	1-L certified clean amber glass bottles fitted with TFE-lined screw caps for reference
sample aliquots

•	Pre-cleaned glass container fitted with TFE-lined screw caps for DOC samples (provided
by STL Burlington)

•	Sample filtration equipment

•	Conductivity meter

•	Salinity refractometer

•	Alkalinity meter

•	pH meter capable of reading pH levels of 1 to 14

•	Thermometers to measure air and water temperature

•	Sample labels


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 18 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

Clear packing tape (to affix sample label to bottles and seal cooler for sample shipment)

Chain-of-custody forms

Bubble wrap to prevent sample breakage

Coolers and blue ice packs for sample shipping

Address labels for the coolers.


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 19 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

4.0 Procedures

4.1 Environmental Sample Collection and Storage

Before environmental sample collection, the total volume of sample material needed to
complete all required analyses for both the test kit and reference methods at all required spike
levels will be determined. Environmental samples will be collected within 21 days of the
preparation of atrazine-fortified samples for the verification test.

The chlorinated drinking water sample from the Battelle laboratory will be collected
directly from the tap into certified clean amber glass bottles. These samples will be stored in the
dark at 4°C until test sample preparation (see Section 4.3). Fresh and brackish pond water
samples will be collected directly into certified clean amber glass bottles. The samples will be
collected at the surface of the water near the shoreline by submerging the containers no more
than one inch below the surface of the water. The groundwater sample will be collected directly
from a tap at the intake to a power plant in the Midwest, prior to any pretreatment of the water by
the power plant.

Each sample will be assigned a unique sample identification (ID) number (see
Section 4.4). The sample II ) number, date, name of person collecting the sample, sample
location, and time of collection will be recorded on a chain-of-custody form for all field samples.
All environmental samples collected in the field will be stored at 4°C and shipped to the Battelle
laboratory on the day of collection following chain-of-custody procedures (see Section 6.1).

4.2 Equipment Calibration

Table 2 identifies the laboratory equipment that require calibration. All equipment will
be calibrated according to the criteria provided in Table 2. The spectrophotometer for
immunoassay analyses will be provided by the vendor and will be calibrated in accordance with
the manufacturer's recommended procedures.


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 20 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

Table 2. Calibration Procedures for Sample Preparation and Physico-chemical
Characterization

Equipment

Calibration
Frequency

Acceptance Criteria

Reference

Refrigerator

Daily

Refrigerators: 4 ± 2 °C

Battelle SOP 3-095, Use of Laboratory
Refrigerators and Freezers

Thermometer

Glass - annually1
Electronic - quarterly
at two temperatures
that bracket target
temperature(s) against
an NIST traceable
thermometer

Appropriate correction
factors applied

Battelle SOP 3-018, Calibration of
Laboratory Thermometers

Variable volume
pipettes (i.e.,
Eppendorf)

Monthly

3% of known of true value.

ASTM E 542, Standard Practice for
Calibration o f Volumetric Apparatus,
and E 969, Standard Specification for
Volumetric (Transfer) Pipettes.

Nonvolumetric

glassware/

labware

(applicable only
when used for
measuring
volumes)

By lot at the time of
purchase

3% of known or true value.

ASTM E 542, Standard Practice for
Calibration of Volumetric Ware

Salinity

Atago refractometer:
Calibrate prior to use
or every 30 minutes

Reichert-Jung
refractometer: Routine
calibration quarterly

Atago refractometer: adjust
the boundary line to 0.0%
when calibrated with
deionized water.

Reichert-Jung refractometer:
The instrument should be
checked using distilled or
deionized water to assure
that the reading departs from
zero by no more than
0.05%.

Battelle SOP 3-051, Use of Salinity
Refractometers

Conductivity
meter

Daily

One point calibration; within
5 % of the expected value

Battelle SOP 3-161, Use of the Cole
Parmer TDSTestr 20 Conductivity
Meter

pH meter

Prior to the analysis

the pH measurement is
within 0.1 pH units

Battelle SOP 3-170, Use of the pH
Testr2 pH meter

Alkalinity meter

Prior to the analysis

pH standards of 4 and 10
within ± 0.05 pH units

Battelle SOP 5-256, Determination of
Alkalinity Using the Radiometer
Titralab

lrrhe criteria are defined for mercury thermometers. Battelle will apply the criteria to all glass thermometers.


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 21 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

4.3 Test Sample Preparation and Storage

Prior to test kit analysis, environmental samples will be filtered and characterized, and
fortified PT samples will be prepared in the laboratory. These procedures are described below.

4.3.1	Physico-chemical Characterization

Prior to the physico-chemical characterization, the fresh and brackish pond water will be
filtered with a 0.45 |jm filter in the laboratory. All environmental samples will be measured for
temperature using a thermometer following Battelle SOP 3-1695, for salinity using a
refractometer following Battelle SOP 3-0516, for conductivity using a conductivity meter
following Battelle SOP 3-1617, for alkalinity using an alkalinity meter following Battelle SOP
5-2568, and for pH using a pH meter following Battelle SOP 3-1709. All measurements will be
recorded manually by the analyst on data sheets designed specifically for this verification test.
All instruments used to measure physico-chemical parameters will be calibrated prior to use
according to the SOPs (Table 2). Instrument model, serial number, and calibration information
will be recorded on data sheets, and calibration records will be maintained in the study files. An
aliquot of each environmental sample will be collected and shipped to the subcontract laboratory
for DOC analysis according to Method 906010.

4.3.2	Sample Preparation

The PT and fortified environmental samples will be prepared from certified,
commercially-available standard solutions. The purchased standards will be diluted to the
appropriate concentration using pesticide-grade or equivalent solvent in Class A volumetric
glassware. All samples will be stored in the dark at 4°C until use. No other preservatives will be
added to the samples because atrazine has been shown to be stable in water for up to two years
when samples are stored under refrigerated conditions11. The PT and fortified environmental
samples will be analyzed within 14 days of sample preparation.


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 22 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

Each sample will be split into 1-L and 100-mL aliquots. The 100-mL aliquots will be
retained for test kit analysis and stored in the dark at 4°C until use. Two 1-L aliquots will be sent
to the EPA Environmental Chemistry Laboratory at the Stennis Space Center for reference
analysis. The chlorinated water sample will be treated with sodium sulfite according to Method
525.2 at the reference laboratory prior to analysis. The samples for reference analysis will be
stored in the dark in amber glass bottles at 4°C until extraction. The reference method sample
extraction will be performed within 14 days of sample preparation (i.e., spiking), and analysis
will be performed within 30 days of sample extraction.

4.4 Sample Identification

All samples will be assigned a unique sample II ) number at the time of preparation. The
sample II ) will include a survey code and sequential number, and will not contain information
about the nature of the sample (i.e., the samples will be blind to the test kit analyst). A master
log of the sample description, sample ID number, and preparation date will be maintained by
Battelle. Each sample container will be labeled with the sample ID, container number (e.g. 1 of
3), preparation date, and initials of the person preparing the sample.

4.5 Sample Analysis

4.5.1 Test Kits

Each vendor will provide test kits and other necessary equipment (e.g. vortexer,
spectrophotometer) for the analysis of all samples. The full set of samples listed in Table 1 will
be analyzed by each test kit. The vendors are encouraged to train the analyst prior to test kit
analysis. A technical staff member from a partner organization with previous experience in
performing immunoassay analyses will analyze the complete set of samples for each technology.
The analyses will be performed according to the vendor's recommended procedures as described


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 23 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

in the test kit instructions or user manual. Calibration and maintenance of the test kits will be
performed as specified by the vendor.

Test kit results will be recorded manually by the analyst on data sheets designed
specifically for this verification test. In addition to the test kit results, the data sheets will include
records of the time required for sample analysis and operator observations concerning the use of
the test kit (e.g. ease of use, maintenance, etc.).

4.5.2 Reference Method

The reference method for analysis of atrazine will be performed on a Hewlett-Packard
5971 GC/MS or equivalent by EPA's Environmental Chemistry Laboratory. The reference
instrument will be operated according to the recommended procedures in the instrument
operating manual, and samples will be analyzed according to EPA Method 525.2,

"Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water by Liquid-Solid Extraction and
Capillary Column Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry"4.

Results from the reference analyses will be recorded electronically and compiled by the
laboratory into a report format, including the sample ID and the analyte concentration for each
sample.

4.6 Schedule

The sample collection, preparation, and analysis are expected to take place over a four-
week period. The time period for each activity should be considered approximate. Table 3 lists
the activities to be conducted and a nominal schedule.

All samples will be analyzed by one test kit before proceeding to the next test kit.

Analysis of all samples using a single test kit is expected to take no longer than one day. Test
conditions will be kept as similar as possible throughout the duration of the test (e.g., air
temperature and lighting conditions) to minimize error introduced by variable test conditions.

Participating vendors must provide the test kits and other sample analysis equipment to


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 24 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

Battelle one week before the start of sample analysis, so that technical staff may become familiar
with the kits and equipment prior to test initiation. This period will also be used to clarify any
questions about the test kit's operation. Vendor staff may be present for this familiarization stage
and may provide training in the operation of the test kits. During the verification test, the test
kits will be operated by partner organization staff. Vendors are encouraged to stay and observe
during the duration of the tests. Unused test kits and associated equipment will be returned to the
vendors at the completion of testing.

Table 3. Approximate Schedule of Verification Test Days

Testing Period

Test Location

Activity

Days 1-21

Field locations

Collection of environmental samples and shipment to
Battelle laboratory

Days 14-21

Battelle Laboratory

Receive test kits and supplies from vendor; test kit
familiarization

Day 18

Battelle Laboratory

Environmental sample filtration

Day 21

Battelle Laboratory

Training, environmental sample physico-chemical
characterization, test sample preparation, shipment of
reference samples and DOC samples to appropriate
laboratories

Days 22-28

Battelle Laboratory

Analysis of all samples using test kits

Days 22-52

EPA Environmental
Chemistry Laboratory

Analysis of reference samples

Days 22-52

STL Burlington

Analysis of environmental water samples for DOC


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 25 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

5.0 Data Handling and Reporting

5.1 Data Acquisition and Review

Various types of data will be acquired and recorded electronically or manually by Battelle
and partner organization technical staff during this verification test. Table 4 summarizes the
types of data to be recorded. All data and observations will be documented on data sheets or in
laboratory record books. Results from the laboratory reference instruments will be compiled in
electronic format.

Records received by or generated by Battelle or partner organization staff in the
verification test will be reviewed by a more Battelle senior staff member within two weeks after
receipt or generation, respectively, before the records are used to calculate, evaluate, or report
verification results. This review will be performed by a Battelle technical staff member involved
in the verification test, but not the staff member that originally received or generated the record.
The review will be documented by the person performing the review by adding his/her initials
and date to a hard copy of the record being reviewed. This hard copy will then be returned to the
Battelle staff member who will be storing the record.

In addition, data calculations performed by Battelle will be spot-checked by Battelle
technical staff to ensure that calculations are performed correctly. Calculations to be checked
include and statistical calculations described in this test/QA plan.

The data obtained from this verification test will be compiled and reported independently
for each test kit. Results for test kits from different vendors will not be compared with each
other.


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 26 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

Table 4. Summary of Data Recording Process for the Verification Test

Data to be
Recorded

Responsible
Party

Where
Recorded

How often
Recorded

Disposition of data11

Dates and times of
test events

Battelle or

partner

organization

ETV data sheets

Start/end of test, and
at each change of a
test parameter

Used to organize/check
test results; manually
incorporated in data
spreadsheets as
necessary

Calibration
information and
results for physico-
chemical
parameters
(temperature,
salinity, pH,
conductivity, etc.)

Battelle

ETV data sheets

Prior to sample
preparation

Manually incorporated
in data spreadsheets as
necessary

Sample collection
and preparation
information,
including chain-of-
custody

Battelle or

partner

organization

ETV data sheets
and chain-of-
custody forms

At time of sample
collection and
preparation

Used to organize/check
test results; manually
incorporated in data
spreadsheets as
necessary

Test kit procedures
and sample results

Battelle or

partner

organization

ETV data sheets

Throughout test
duration

Manually incorporated
in data spreadsheets

Reference method
procedures and
sample results

Battelle or

partner

organization

ETV data sheets,
or data
acquisition
system, as
appropriate

Throughout sample
analysis process

Transferred to
spreadsheets

DOC analysis
procedures and
sample results

Subcontract
laboratory

ETV data sheets,
or data
acquisition
system, as
appropriate

Throughout sample
analysis process

Transferred to
spreadsheets

(a) All activities subsequent to data recording are carried out by Battelle.


-------
Atrazine Test Kits

Test/QA Plan
Page 27 of 36
Version 1.0

Date: September 15, 2003

5.2 Data Analysis

Procedures for analyzing the data produced in the verification test are described in this

section.

5.2.1 Accuracy

For test kits that provide quantitative results, PT sample accuracy will be assessed relative
to the spike level, and environmental sample accuracy will be assessed relative to the reference
method results. The results for each set of analyses will be averaged, and the accuracy will be
expressed in terms of a percent recovery (R) as calculated from Equation 1:

where C is the average concentration measured by the test kit and Cr is the spike level for the
PT samples and the reference measurement for the environmental samples.

For qualitative results, accuracy will be assessed by determining whether the test kit result
agrees with the reference method result. An overall percent agreement will be determined by
dividing the number of correct responses to the overall number of analyses.

5.2.2 Precision

For test kits that provide quantitative results, the standard deviation (S) of the results for
the three replicate samples will be calculated for each sample using Equation 2:

where n is the number of replicate samples, Ck is the concentration measured for the kth sample,
and C is the average concentration of the replicate samples. The precision for each sample will

R = C / CR x 100

(1)

1/2

(2)


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 28 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

be reported in terms of the relative standard deviation (RSD) as calculated using Equation 3:

RSD =

x 100

(3)

For test kits that provide qualitative results, precision will be assessed by calculating the
percentage of consistent responses.

5.2.3	Linearity

For test kits that provide quantitative results, linearity will be assessed by performing a
linear regression with the spiked analyte concentration as the independent variable, and the
individual test kit result as the dependent variable. Individual replicate results for the five PT
samples will be used in the linear regression. Linearity will be expressed in terms of the slope,
intercept, and correlation coefficient (r).

5.2.4	Method Detection Limit

The method detection limit for each test kit will be assessed using results from seven
replicate analyses of a sample spiked at a level of two times the vendor-stated test kit detection
limit. The standard deviation of the seven replicate samples will be calculated using Equation 2.
The MDL will be calculated using Equation 4:

MDL = txS	(4)

Where t is the Student's t value for a 99% confidence level and S is the standard deviation of the
seven replicate samples.


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 29 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

5.2.5	Cross Reactivity

The cross reactivity of the test kits to the atrazine degradation products hydroxyatrazine
and desethyl atrazine will be assessed qualitatively by evaluating the test kit results for samples
that contain only the degradation compound, but not atrazine. The reference analysis results will
be used to confirm the absence of atrazine in the samples.

5.2.6	Matrix Interferences

The potential effect of the sample matrix on the test kit performance will be evaluated
qualitatively by comparing the accuracy and precision results for the natural and atrazine-fortified
environmental samples to those for the PT samples.

5.2.7	False Positives/False Negatives

For quantitative and semi-quantitative technologies, the occurrence of false positive and
false negative results will be assessed relative to the test kit's lowest calibration standard. A
false positive is defined as a positive test kit result when reference method analysis indicates that
the atrazine concentration in the sample is below the test kit's lowest calibration standard. A
false negative will be defined as a negative test kit result when the reference method analysis
indicates that the atrazine concentration in the sample is above the test kit's lowest calibration
standard. For qualitative technologies, a false positive is defined as a positive test kit result when
the reference method analysis indicates that the atrazine concentration in the sample is below the
threshold value (+10%) of the kit. A false negative is defined as a negative test kit result when
the reference method analysis indicates that the atrazine concentration in the sample is above the
threshold value (+10%) of the kit. The rate of false positives/false negatives will be expressed as
a percentage of total number of samples. Reagent blanks, PT samples, and environmental
samples will be included in the analysis.


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 30 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

5.3 Reporting

The data obtained in the verification test will be compiled separately for each test kit, and
the data evaluation methods described in Section 5.2 will be applied to each data set without
comparison to any other technology. At no time will data for test kits from different vendors be
intercompared or ranked. Following completion of the data evaluation, a draft verification report
will be prepared for each test kit. The verification report will describe the verification test
procedures and document the results. Each draft verification report will each be submitted to the
corresponding vendor for review and comment. Each draft report will be revised in response to
the comments provided by the vendor. The revised reports will be submitted for external peer
review. The reports will be revised again to address the peer review comments, and then
submitted to EPA for final approval.

A verification statement will also be prepared for each test kit. The verification statement
is a 2- to 3-page summary of the technology, test procedures, and results. The verification
statement will follow the same review and revision process as the verification reports. Upon
final approval by EPA, each verification statement will be signed by a senior Battelle manager
and an EPA laboratory director. Final verification reports and statements will be posted on the
ETV website (http://www.epa.gov/etv), and original signed verification statements will be
provided to the vendor.


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 31 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

6.0 Quality Assurance /Quality Control

The QA/QC activities associated with this verification test will focus primarily on sample
preparation and handling, data recording and analysis, and reference laboratory analysis. An
independent audit covering each of these areas will be performed by the Battelle Quality
Manager to ensure the quality of the verification test.

6.1 Sample Chain-of-Custody Procedures

Sample custody will be documented throughout collection, shipping, and analysis of the
samples. Sample chain-of-custody procedures will be in accordance with the Battelle SOP
6-010, Sample Receipt, Custody, and Handling11. The chain-of-custody form summarizes the
samples collected and analyses requested. The custody form will track sample release from the
field to the Battelle laboratory, and from the Battelle laboratory to the subcontract laboratory and
EPA's Environmental Chemistry Laboratory. Each sample custody form will be signed by the
person relinquishing samples once that person has verified that the custody form is accurate. The
original sample custody forms accompany the samples; the shipper will keep a copy. Upon
receipt at the sample destination, sample custody forms will be signed by the person receiving the
samples once that person has verified that all samples identified on the custody forms are present
in the shipping container. Any discrepancies will be noted on the form and the sample receiver
will immediately contact the Verification Test Coordinator to report missing, broken, or
compromised samples.

6.2 Audits

6.2.1 Technical Systems Audit

The Battelle Quality Manager or his designee will conduct a technical systems audit at
least once during the course of the verification test. The purpose of this audit is to ensure that the


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 32 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

verification test is being performed in accordance with this test/QA plan and the AMS Center
QMP1, and that all procedures described in this test/QA plan are being followed. This audit will
review the standards and methods used, compare actual test procedures to those specified in this
test/QA plan, and review data acquisition and handling procedures. An independent technical
systems audit may also be performed by EPA Quality Management staff during the verification
test at EPA's discretion.

6.2.2	Data Quality Audit

At least 10% percent of the data acquired during the verification test will be audited
during the verification test. Battelle's Quality Manager or his designee will trace the data from
its initial acquisition, through reduction and statistical analysis, to final reporting, to ensure the
integrity of the reported results. All calculations performed on the data undergoing the audit will
be checked.

6.2.3	Performance Evaluation Audit

A performance evaluation (PE) audit will be conducted to assess the quality of the
reference measurements made in this verification test. A PE audit involves challenging the
reference instrument with a standard that is independent of the one used to calibrate the
instrument for the test. For the PE audit, a certified standard will be obtained from a commercial
supplier other than the one that supplied the standard for the preparation of PT and fortified
environmental samples, or the one used to calibrate the reference instrument. The PE sample
result must be within the certified range to be considered acceptable. Failure to achieve this
agreement will trigger recalibration of the reference instrument with the original QC standard,
and a repeat of the PE comparison. Failure in the second comparison requires obtaining another
set of standards, and repeating the performance audit.


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 33 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

6.3 Reference Method QC

The performance of the reference method will be demonstrated through the analysis of
QC samples. Laboratory RB samples will be analyzed to ensure that no sources of contamination
are present. If the analysis of a laboratory RB sample indicates a concentration above the method
detection limit (MDL) for the reference instrument, then contamination will be suspected. Any
contamination source(s) will be corrected, and proper blank readings will be achieved, before
proceeding with the reference analyses.

The accuracy of the reference method will be verified before the beginning and at the
conclusion of each testing day. The instrument to be used for reference analyses will be initially
calibrated according to the procedures specified in the reference method. The instrument
calibration will be verified using an appropriate calibration check sample. If the result for the
calibration check sample differs by more than ±20% from the value of the standard, then the
instrument will be recalibrated before continuation of the test.

Laboratory matrix spike samples will be analyzed at a frequency of at least 5% to assess
whether matrix effects potentially influence the results of the reference analyses. The percent
recovery (R) of the laboratory matrix spikes will be calculated from the following Equation 5:

C-C	,c.

R=—	x 100	(5)

s

where Cs is the analyzed concentration of the spiked sample, C is the analyzed concentration of
the unspiked sample, and s is the concentration equivalent of the analyte spike. If the percent
recovery of a matrix spike sample falls outside the range from 70-130%, then a matrix effect will
be suspected.

Analytical duplicates will be analyzed at a frequency of at least 5% to assess analytical
precision. The relative percent difference (RPD) between the two duplicates should be within
30%.


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 34 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

A Laboratory Fortified Blank (LFB) sample will be analyzed with each set of samples to
determine whether the methodology is in control. If the recovery of the LFB falls out of the range
of 70-130% of the actual concentration, then work should be stopped until the source of the
problem is identified.

Upon completion of the data package and draft final report, the EPA Environmental
Chemistry Laboratory QA Officer will review all data and results for accuracy, precision,
completeness, and representativeness. The QA Officer also will conduct a review of the project
with the Lead Chemist and present the findings to the Environmental Chemistry Laboratory
Branch Chief for review and comment before approving the final report. The QA Officer may at
any time selectively review any data during tabulation, and will be available for consultation with
the Lead Chemist regarding any QAPP deviations and corrective action.

6.4	QA/QC Reporting

Each assessment and audit will be documented in accordance with Section 3.3.4 of the
AMS Center QMP1. The results of the technical systems audit will be submitted to EPA.
Assessment reports will include the following:

•	Identification of any adverse findings or potential problems.

•	Response to adverse findings or potential problems.

•	Recommendations for resolving problems.

•	Confirmation that solutions have been implemented and are effective.

•	Citation of any noteworthy practices that may be of use to others.

6.5	Corrective Action

During the course of any assessment or audit, the Battelle Quality Manager will inform
the technical staff of any immediate corrective action that should be taken. If serious quality


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 35 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

problems exist, the Battelle Quality Manager is authorized to stop work. Once the assessment
report has been prepared, the Verification Test Coordinator will ensure that a response is
provided for each adverse finding or potential problem, and will implement any necessary
follow-up corrective action. The Battelle Quality Manager will ensure that follow-up corrective
action has been taken.


-------
Atrazine Test Kits
Test/QA Plan
Page 36 of 36
Version 1.0
Date: September 15, 2003

7.0 References

1.	Quality Management Plan (QMP) for the ETV Advanced Monitoring Systems Center,
Version 4.0. EPA Environmental Technology Verification Program, prepared by Battelle,
Columbus, Ohio, December, 2002.

2.	Environmental Technology Verification Program Quality Management Plan, December
2002 (EPA/600/R-03/021).

3.	National Primary Drinking Water Standards, 40 CFR Part 141.

4.	U.S. EPA Method 525.2, Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water by
Liquid-solid Extraction and Capillary Column Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry,
Revision 2.0, 1995.

5.	Battelle SOP 3-169. Operation of Digital Thermometers. May 21, 2002.

6.	Battelle SOP 3-051. Use of Salinity Refractometers. October 3, 1990.

7.	Battelle SOP 3-161. Use of the Cole-Parmer TDSTestr 20 Conductivity Meter. June 17,
1996.

8.	Battelle SOP 5-256. Determination of Alkalinity Using the Radiometer Titralab. May 10,
1995.

9.	Battelle SOP 3-170. Use of the pH Testr2 pH meter. June 21, 2000.

10.	U.S. EPA Method 9060 Total Organic Carbon, Revision 0, September 1986.

11.	Ciba Crop Protection Report ABR-94094, Storage Stability of Atrazine, G-30033, G28279,
and G28273 in Water Under Refrigerator Storage Conditions, Greensboro, NC as cited in
"Interlaboratory Validation of an Atrazine Immunoassay." Journal of the Americal Water
Works Association, September 2001.

12.	Battelle SOP 6-010. Sample Receipt, Custody, and Handling. August 7, 2000.


-------